User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Existing PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 1: Sonoma Boulevard & Florida Street Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 50 50 30 10 60 30 30 340 20 40 280 40 Future Volume (veh/h) 50 50 30 10 60 30 30 340 20 40 280 40 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 53 5 11 64 5 32 362 15 43 298 31 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333333333
Cap, veh/h 264 267 25 273 272 21 793 1341 1133 701 1341 1133 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.72 0.72 0.72 Sat Flow, veh/h 1321 1670 158 1334 1699 133 1041 1856 1568 997 1856 1568 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 0 58 11 0 69 32 362 15 43 298 31 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1321 0 1827 1334 0 1832 1041 1856 1568 997 1856 1568 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 2.1 0.5 0.0 2.5 1.3 8.7 0.4 1.3 4.0 0.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.2 0.0 2.1 2.6 0.0 2.5 5.3 8.7 0.4 10.0 4.0 0.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 264 0 292 273 0 293 793 1341 1133 701 1341 1133 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.04 0.00 0.24 0.04 0.27 0.01 0.06 0.22 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 440 0 536 451 0 537 793 1341 1133 701 1341 1133 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.8 0.0 27.3 28.5 0.0 27.5 7.8 7.6 5.5 6.1 3.4 2.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.3 3.5 0.1 0.2 1.1 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.9 0.0 27.4 28.5 0.0 27.6 7.9 8.1 5.5 6.1 3.5 2.9 LnGrp LOS C A C C A C AAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 111 80 409 372
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.6 27.8 8.0 3.7
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.8 16.2 58.8 16.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.2 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 44.2 * 22 44.2 * 22
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.7 7.2 12.0 4.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.3
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 2: Mare Island Way & Georgia Street Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 10 10 20 20 40 20 590 10 40 430 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 10 10 20 20 40 20 590 10 40 430 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 11 1 22 22 3 22 641 10 43 467 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 39 131 12 39 125 17 39 961 15 69 1017 20
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.27 0.27 0.04 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1660 151 1767 1577 215 1767 3551 55 1767 3535 68 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 0 12 22 0 25 22 318 333 43 233 243 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 0 1811 1767 0 1792 1767 1763 1844 1767 1763 1840 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 5.5 5.5 0.8 3.7 3.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 5.5 5.5 0.8 3.7 3.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 39 0 143 39 0 142 39 477 499 69 507 530 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.00 0.08 0.56 0.00 0.18 0.56 0.67 0.67 0.62 0.46 0.46 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 781 0 800 781 0 792 468 1765 1846 468 1765 1843 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.4 0.0 14.5 16.4 0.0 14.6 16.4 11.0 11.0 16.1 9.9 9.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.7 0.0 0.1 4.7 0.0 0.2 4.7 0.6 0.6 3.3 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.0 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.1 0.0 14.6 21.1 0.0 14.8 21.1 11.6 11.6 19.4 10.2 10.2 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C BBBBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 34 47 673 519
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.8 17.8 11.9 10.9
Approach LOS BBBB
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.3 14.2 5.7 7.7 5.7 14.8 5.7 7.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 7.5 2.4 2.2 2.4 5.7 2.4 2.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.9
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 40 20 30 60 20 10 40 20 30 30 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 40 20 30 60 20 10 40 20 30 30 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 47 13 35 71 15 12 47 0 35 35 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 253 553 132 340 516 88 258 192 0 373 106 3
Arrive On Green 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.13 Sat Flow, veh/h 106 1319 314 260 1231 211 317 1442 0 795 795 23 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 72 0 0 121 0 0 59 0 0 71 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1739 0 0 1702 0 0 1759 0 0 1612 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.17 0.18 0.29 0.12 0.20 0.00 0.49 0.01
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 938 0 0 944 0 0 450 0 0 482 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3139 0 0 3083 0 0 2623 0 0 2444 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.5 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A AAAAAAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 72 121 59 71
Approach Delay, s/veh 3.6 3.7 7.9 8.0
Approach LOS AAAA
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.9 7.2 12.9 7.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 28.0 35.0 28.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.4
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 70 10 10 90 20 0 30 10 30 50 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 70 10 10 90 20 0 30 10 30 50 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 11 78 2 11 100 4 0 33 2 33 56 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 298 447 11 286 450 17 0 349 21 424 222 7
Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 125 1623 39 100 1635 63 0 1731 105 511 1103 36 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 91 0 0 115 0000 3 5 9 100
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1788 0 0 1798 0000 1835 1651 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.12 0.02 0.10 0.03 0.00 0.06 0.36 0.02
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 756 0 0 753 0000 3 7 0 6 5 400
V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.14 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3705 0 0 3735 0000 3001 2978 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.2 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.3 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 5.2 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A AAAAAAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 91 115 35 91
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.3 4.4 5.1 5.2
Approach LOS AAAA
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 7.1 8.2 7.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 25.0 30.0 25.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 2.2 2.6 2.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 4.7
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 5: Sonoma Boulevard & Georgia Street Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 70 20 40 100 70 20 290 20 40 240 40 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 70 20 40 100 70 20 290 20 40 240 40 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 11 75 6 43 108 10 22 312 13 43 258 27 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 63 166 12 109 170 185 87 1172 992 139 1227 1039 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.05 0.63 0.63 0.08 0.66 0.66 Sat Flow, veh/h 74 1350 99 383 1381 1505 1767 1856 1571 1767 1856 1571 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 92 0 0 151 0 10 22 312 13 43 258 27 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1523 0 0 1764 0 1505 1767 1856 1571 1767 1856 1571 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.9 5.6 0.2 1.7 4.1 0.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.4 0.9 5.6 0.2 1.7 4.1 0.4 Prop In Lane 0.12 0.07 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 241 0 0 279 0 185 87 1172 992 139 1227 1039 V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.05 0.25 0.27 0.01 0.31 0.21 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 629 0 0 648 0 522 259 1172 992 259 1227 1039 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.4 0.0 0.0 31.4 0.0 29.0 34.3 6.1 5.1 32.6 5.0 4.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.2 0.4 2.0 0.1 0.7 1.4 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.8 0.0 0.0 32.0 0.0 29.1 34.9 6.7 5.2 33.1 5.4 4.4 LnGrp LOS C A A C A C C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 92 161 347 328
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.8 31.9 8.4 8.9
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.6 52.0 13.4 7.4 54.2 13.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 4.6 * 4.2 3.7 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 25.5 * 26 11.0 25.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 7.6 8.0 2.9 6.1 7.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.9
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 6: Mare Island Way & Maine Street Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 40 0 30 10 610 40 70 380 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 40 0 30 10 610 40 70 380 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1856 1870 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 47 0 35 11 718 42 82 447 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.92 0.85 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22323233330
Cap, veh/h 218 214 0 420 0 181 26 1598 93 141 1898 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.01 0.47 0.47 0.08 0.54 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1373 1870 0 1767 0 1583 1781 3380 198 1767 3618 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 47 0 35 11 374 386 82 447 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1373 1870 0 1767 0 1583 1781 1763 1815 1767 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.7 0.2 4.7 4.7 1.5 2.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.7 0.2 4.7 4.7 1.5 2.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 218 214 0 420 0 181 26 834 858 141 1898 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.19 0.42 0.45 0.45 0.58 0.24 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 892 1131 0 1287 0 958 647 1600 1647 962 3199 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.3 0.0 13.3 16.2 5.8 5.8 14.7 4.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 10.7 0.8 0.8 3.7 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.1 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 13.8 26.8 6.6 6.6 18.4 4.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS A AABABCAABAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 82 771 529
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 13.6 6.9 6.4
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.1 19.6 7.3 4.0 21.8 7.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 30.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 6.7 0.0 2.2 4.2 2.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 8.9 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.1
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th TWSC Elite Charter School TIA
7: Maine Street & Sacramento Street Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.7
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 40 40 20 40 10
Future Vol, veh/h 20 40 40 20 40 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00002
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 33333
Mvmt Flow 22 44 44 22 44 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 66 0 - 0 143 57
Stage 1 - - - - 55 -
Stage 2 - - - - 88 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1529 - - - 847 1006
Stage 1 - - - - 965 -
Stage 2 - - - - 933 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1529 - - - 834 1004
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 834 -
Stage 1 - - - - 951 -
Stage 2 - - - - 933 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.5 0 9.5
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1529 - - - 863
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 - - - 0.064
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 9.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 340 110 0 440 160 220 150 10 150 80 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 340 110 0 440 160 220 150 10 150 80 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 370 120 0 478 48 137 306 0 163 87 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 033033333333
Cap, veh/h 0 1249 522 0 1187 521 654 1342 562 551 51
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3711 1552 0 3618 1547 1285 3711 0 893 1523 140 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 370 120 0 478 48 137 306 0 163 0 95 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 1552 0 1763 1547 1285 1856 0 893 0 1663 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 2.2 1.7 0.0 3.1 0.6 2.4 1.7 0.0 3.8 0.0 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 2.2 1.7 0.0 3.1 0.6 3.6 1.7 0.0 5.5 0.0 1.2 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1249 522 0 1187 521 654 1342 562 0 601 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.30 0.23 0.00 0.40 0.09 0.21 0.23 0.29 0.00 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 3692 1543 0 3507 1539 1254 3076 1093 0 1433 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 7.4 7.2 0.0 7.7 6.8 7.7 6.7 0.0 8.6 0.0 6.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 7.4 7.3 0.0 7.8 6.9 7.8 6.7 0.0 8.7 0.0 6.6 LnGrp LOS AAAAAAAA AAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 490 526 443 258
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.4 7.7 7.1 7.9
Approach LOS AAAA
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 * 4.2 4.9 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 * 26 30.0 * 25
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 7.5 5.1 5.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.5
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 1: Sonoma Boulevard & Florida Street Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 100 50 30 20 60 60 20 670 10 60 510 70 Future Volume (veh/h) 100 50 30 20 60 60 20 670 10 60 510 70 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 105 53 5 21 63 15 21 705 8 63 537 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 222 242 23 239 210 50 613 1394 1176 523 1394 1176 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Sat Flow, veh/h 1296 1667 157 1319 1444 344 812 1856 1565 731 1856 1565 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 105 0 58 21 0 78 21 705 8 63 537 62 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1296 0 1825 1319 0 1788 812 1856 1565 731 1856 1565 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.7 0.0 2.4 1.2 0.0 3.3 0.8 12.9 0.1 3.2 8.6 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.0 0.0 2.4 3.6 0.0 3.3 9.4 12.9 0.1 16.2 8.6 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 222 0 265 239 0 259 613 1394 1176 523 1394 1176 V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.00 0.22 0.09 0.00 0.30 0.03 0.51 0.01 0.12 0.39 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 370 0 472 389 0 463 613 1394 1176 523 1394 1176 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.0 0.0 32.1 33.7 0.0 32.5 5.3 4.2 2.6 7.5 3.7 2.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 1.1 0.4 0.0 1.4 0.1 4.1 0.0 0.5 2.5 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.5 0.0 32.2 33.7 0.0 32.7 5.4 5.4 2.6 7.5 3.8 2.7 LnGrp LOS D A C C A C A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 163 99 734 662
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.6 32.9 5.4 4.0
Approach LOS D C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 68.5 16.5 68.5 16.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.2 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 54.2 * 22 54.2 * 22
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.9 12.0 18.2 5.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.4
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 2: Mare Island Way & Georgia Street Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 40 20 20 20 20 120 40 580 20 60 430 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 40 20 20 20 20 120 40 580 20 60 430 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.82 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 21 3 21 21 13 43 617 18 64 457 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 68 210 30 37 116 72 68 931 27 91 990 19
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1546 221 1767 982 608 1767 3492 102 1767 3535 70 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 43 0 24 21 0 34 43 311 324 64 228 238 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 0 1767 1767 0 1589 1767 1763 1831 1767 1763 1842 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.9 6.0 6.0 1.4 4.1 4.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.9 6.0 6.0 1.4 4.1 4.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 68 0 240 37 0 188 68 470 488 91 494 516 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.00 0.10 0.57 0.00 0.18 0.63 0.66 0.66 0.70 0.46 0.46 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 696 0 695 696 0 626 417 1573 1634 417 1573 1643 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.1 0.0 14.4 18.5 0.0 15.1 18.1 12.4 12.4 17.8 11.3 11.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.6 0.0 0.1 5.0 0.0 0.2 3.6 0.6 0.6 3.6 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 1.8 1.9 0.6 1.2 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.7 0.0 14.5 23.5 0.0 15.3 21.7 13.0 13.0 21.4 11.6 11.6 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 67 55 678 530
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.1 18.4 13.6 12.8
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.0 15.2 5.8 10.2 6.5 15.7 6.5 9.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 8.0 2.4 2.5 2.9 6.1 2.9 2.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.7
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 80 10 10 70 40 30 50 30 30 40 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 80 10 10 70 40 30 50 30 30 40 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25 99 7 12 86 23 37 62 12 37 49 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 250 594 37 203 530 130 294 226 37 316 216 29 Arrive On Green 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 148 1519 94 65 1357 334 385 1095 179 443 1048 139 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 131 0 0 121 0 0 111 0 0 94 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1762 0 0 1756 0 0 1659 0 0 1630 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.19 0.05 0.10 0.19 0.33 0.11 0.39 0.09
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 881 0 0 863 0 0 557 0 0 561 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2856 0 0 2871 0 0 2231 0 0 2192 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 131 121 111 94
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.5 4.5 7.7 7.6
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.2 9.1 13.2 9.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 28.0 35.0 28.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 3.2 3.0 3.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.9
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 110 10 20 80 30 20 50 20 30 60 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 110 10 20 80 30 20 50 20 30 60 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.95 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 125 6 23 91 11 23 57 4 34 68 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 241 486 21 255 442 47 293 431 25 319 405 24
Arrive On Green 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 135 1570 69 161 1426 153 236 1408 82 296 1326 80 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 154 0 0 125 0 0 84 0 0 107 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1774 0 0 1740 0 0 1727 0 0 1701 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.15 0.04 0.18 0.09 0.27 0.05 0.32 0.05
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 748 0 0 744 0 0 748 0 0 748 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2691 0 0 2630 0 0 2209 0 0 2187 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.4 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.5 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 154 125 84 107
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.5 5.4 5.3 5.4
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 25.0 30.0 25.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 2.7 3.3 2.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.4 0.9 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.4
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 5: Sonoma Boulevard & Georgia Street Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 40 130 20 20 90 80 30 570 50 90 370 40 Future Volume (veh/h) 40 130 20 20 90 80 30 570 50 90 370 40 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 41 133 14 20 92 12 31 582 31 92 378 27 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 86 183 18 76 245 230 108 1109 937 184 1189 984 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.60 0.60 0.10 0.64 0.64 Sat Flow, veh/h 231 1212 116 175 1624 1526 1767 1856 1567 1767 1856 1535 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 188 0 0 112 0 12 31 582 31 92 378 27 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1559 0 0 1799 0 1526 1767 1856 1567 1767 1856 1535 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.4 15.6 0.7 4.2 7.8 0.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.1 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.6 1.4 15.6 0.7 4.2 7.8 0.5 Prop In Lane 0.22 0.07 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 287 0 0 322 0 230 108 1109 937 184 1189 984 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.05 0.29 0.52 0.03 0.50 0.32 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 543 0 0 585 0 467 249 1109 937 249 1189 984 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.99 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.93 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.9 0.0 0.0 32.6 0.0 30.9 38.1 10.0 7.0 36.0 6.9 5.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.8 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.2 0.6 6.1 0.2 1.8 2.9 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.8 0.0 0.0 32.8 0.0 30.9 38.7 11.8 7.1 36.7 7.5 5.6 LnGrp LOS D A A C A C D B A D A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 188 124 644 497
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.8 32.7 12.9 12.8
Approach LOS D C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.6 55.4 17.0 8.9 59.1 17.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 4.6 * 4.2 3.7 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 34.5 * 26 12.0 34.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.2 17.6 12.1 3.4 9.8 6.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.5
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 6: Mare Island Way & Maine Street Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 50 0 50 10 520 30 60 460 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 50 0 50 10 520 30 60 460 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 54 0 54 11 559 29 65 495 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 244 267 0 496 0 225 26 1411 73 124 1596 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.41 0.41 0.07 0.45 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1339 1856 0 1760 0 1569 1767 3405 176 1767 3618 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 54 0 54 11 289 299 65 495 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1339 1856 0 1760 0 1569 1767 1763 1819 1767 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.2 3.4 3.4 1.0 2.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.2 3.4 3.4 1.0 2.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 244 267 0 496 0 225 26 730 754 124 1596 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.24 0.43 0.40 0.40 0.53 0.31 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 957 1255 0 1434 0 1061 717 1789 1846 1076 3577 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 11.2 14.4 6.1 6.1 13.3 5.2 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 10.7 0.7 0.7 3.4 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 0.0 11.8 25.2 6.8 6.8 16.7 5.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A B A B C A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 108 599 560
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 11.5 7.1 6.7
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.6 16.2 7.7 4.4 17.4 7.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 30.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.0 5.4 0.0 2.2 4.6 2.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 6.8 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.3
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th TWSC Elite Charter School TIA
7: Maine Street & Sacramento Street Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 70 50 30 40 20
Future Vol, veh/h 10 70 50 30 40 20
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 4 2 7
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 11 80 57 34 46 23
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 95 0 - 0 182 85
Stage 1 - - - - 78 -
Stage 2 - - - - 104 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1493 - - - 805 971
Stage 1 - - - - 943 -
Stage 2 - - - - 918 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1487 - - - 792 961
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 792 -
Stage 1 - - - - 932 -
Stage 2 - - - - 914 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.9 0 9.7
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1487 - - - 841
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - - 0.082
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 9.7
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.3
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 410 130 0 340 200 260 380 30 220 150 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 410 130 0 340 200 260 380 30 220 150 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 427 135 0 354 65 230 453 0 229 156 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 1194 506 0 1134 505 612 1440 512 588 57
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.39 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3711 1572 0 3618 1570 1204 3711 0 726 1514 146 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 427 135 0 354 65 230 453 0 229 0 171 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 1572 0 1763 1570 1204 1856 0 726 0 1660 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 2.8 2.0 0.0 2.4 0.9 5.1 2.7 0.0 7.1 0.0 2.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 2.8 2.0 0.0 2.4 0.9 7.3 2.7 0.0 9.8 0.0 2.2 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.09
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1194 506 0 1134 505 612 1440 512 0 644 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.36 0.27 0.00 0.31 0.13 0.38 0.31 0.45 0.00 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 3552 1505 0 3375 1502 1105 2960 922 0 1377 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 8.1 7.9 0.0 8.0 7.5 9.0 6.7 0.0 10.1 0.0 6.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.9 0.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 8.2 8.0 0.0 8.1 7.6 9.2 6.7 0.0 10.3 0.0 6.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 562 419 683 A 400
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.2 8.0 7.5 8.7
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.0 16.4 15.0 16.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 * 4.2 4.9 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 * 26 30.0 * 25
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.8 11.8 4.4 9.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.0
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 1: Sonoma Boulevard & Florida Street Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 50 50 30 16 62 30 30 369 25 40 331 40 Future Volume (veh/h) 50 50 30 16 62 30 30 369 25 40 331 40 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 53 5 17 66 5 32 393 20 43 352 31 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 333333333333
Cap, veh/h 262 267 25 273 273 21 748 1341 1133 670 1341 1133 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.72 0.72 0.72 Sat Flow, veh/h 1319 1670 158 1334 1703 129 991 1856 1568 965 1856 1568 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 0 58 17 0 71 32 393 20 43 352 31 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1319 0 1827 1334 0 1832 991 1856 1568 965 1856 1568 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 2.1 0.8 0.0 2.5 1.4 9.5 0.5 1.4 4.9 0.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.3 0.0 2.1 2.9 0.0 2.5 6.3 9.5 0.5 11.0 4.9 0.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 262 0 292 273 0 293 748 1341 1133 670 1341 1133 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.06 0.00 0.24 0.04 0.29 0.02 0.06 0.26 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 438 0 536 451 0 537 748 1341 1133 670 1341 1133 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.8 0.0 27.3 28.6 0.0 27.5 8.4 7.8 5.5 6.4 3.6 2.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.3 0.0 1.1 0.3 3.9 0.1 0.3 1.4 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.0 0.0 27.4 28.6 0.0 27.7 8.5 8.4 5.5 6.4 3.6 2.9 LnGrp LOS C A C C A C AAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 111 88 445 426
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.7 27.9 8.2 3.8
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.8 16.2 58.8 16.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.2 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 44.2 * 22 44.2 * 22
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.5 7.3 13.0 4.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.2
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 2: Mare Island Way & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 10 10 20 20 44 20 594 24 54 431 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 10 10 20 20 44 20 594 24 54 431 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 11 1 22 22 5 22 646 23 59 468 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 39 131 12 39 113 26 39 953 34 88 1070 21
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1660 151 1767 1433 326 1767 3468 123 1767 3535 68 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 0 12 22 0 27 22 328 341 59 233 244 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 0 1810 1767 0 1758 1767 1763 1829 1767 1763 1841 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.4 5.8 5.8 1.1 3.7 3.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.4 5.8 5.8 1.1 3.7 3.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 39 0 143 39 0 139 39 484 503 88 534 557 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.00 0.08 0.57 0.00 0.19 0.57 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.44 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 761 0 780 761 0 757 457 1721 1785 457 1721 1797 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.9 0.0 14.9 16.9 0.0 15.0 16.9 11.3 11.3 16.3 9.8 9.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.7 0.0 0.1 4.7 0.0 0.3 4.7 0.6 0.6 3.2 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 1.7 1.7 0.4 1.0 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.6 0.0 15.0 21.6 0.0 15.3 21.6 11.9 11.9 19.5 10.0 10.0 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C BBBAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 34 49 691 536
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.2 18.1 12.2 11.0
Approach LOS BBBB
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.7 14.6 5.8 7.7 5.8 15.5 5.8 7.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 7.8 2.4 2.2 2.4 5.7 2.4 2.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.1
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 66 22 30 60 20 14 46 40 38 31 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 66 22 30 60 20 14 46 40 38 31 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 78 14 35 71 13 16 54 5 45 36 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 227 600 98 337 513 76 258 196 17 396 109 3
Arrive On Green 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 76 1455 238 265 1245 185 305 1318 116 836 737 19 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 104 0 0 119 0 0 75 0 0 82 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1769 0 0 1695 0 0 1738 0 0 1592 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.12 0.13 0.29 0.11 0.21 0.07 0.55 0.01
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 925 0 0 926 0 0 472 0 0 509 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3152 0 0 3006 0 0 2544 0 0 2363 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.8 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A AAAAAAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 104 119 75 82
Approach Delay, s/veh 3.8 3.9 7.9 7.9
Approach LOS AAAA
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.9 7.5 12.9 7.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 28.0 35.0 28.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.5
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 98 32 68 90 21 0 30 10 30 72 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 98 32 68 90 21 0 30 10 30 72 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 109 17 76 100 14 0 33 2 33 80 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 264 463 67 434 334 38 0 376 23 346 280 13
Arrive On Green 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 101 1449 211 445 1045 119 0 1730 105 361 1286 58 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 142 0 0 190 0000 3 5 1 1 700
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1761 0 0 1609 0000 1835 1705 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.11 0.12 0.40 0.07 0.00 0.06 0.28 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 795 0 0 806 0000 3 9 9 6 3 800
V/C Ratio(X) 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.18 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3227 0 0 2970 0000 2655 2683 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.3 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 5.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.4 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 5.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A AAAAAAAAAAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 142 190 35 117
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.4 4.6 5.5 5.8
Approach LOS AAAA
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 7.8 9.5 7.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 25.0 30.0 25.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 2.3 3.0 2.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.1 0.8 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 4.9
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 5: Sonoma Boulevard & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 21 79 28 49 135 70 29 313 33 40 260 67 Future Volume (veh/h) 21 79 28 49 135 70 29 313 33 40 260 67 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 23 85 13 53 145 12 31 337 21 43 280 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 33333333333
Cap, veh/h 68 137 18 111 196 227 112 1121 949 139 1150 974 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.60 0.60 0.08 0.62 0.62 Sat Flow, veh/h 69 913 118 334 1303 1512 1767 1856 1571 1767 1856 1571 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 121 0 0 198 0 12 31 337 21 43 280 45 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1100 0 0 1637 0 1512 1767 1856 1571 1767 1856 1571 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.3 6.6 0.4 1.7 5.1 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.1 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 0.5 1.3 6.6 0.4 1.7 5.1 0.8 Prop In Lane 0.19 0.11 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 222 0 0 307 0 227 112 1121 949 139 1150 974 V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.05 0.28 0.30 0.02 0.31 0.24 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 547 0 0 632 0 524 259 1121 949 259 1150 974 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.98 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.1 0.0 0.0 30.7 0.0 27.3 33.5 7.2 6.0 32.6 6.4 5.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.2 0.5 2.4 0.1 0.7 1.8 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.9 0.0 0.0 31.5 0.0 27.3 34.0 7.9 6.0 33.1 6.9 5.7 LnGrp LOS C A A C A C C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 121 210 389 368
Approach Delay, s/veh 29.9 31.3 9.8 9.8
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9.6 49.9 15.5 8.5 51.1 15.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 4.6 * 4.2 3.7 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 25.5 * 26 11.0 25.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 8.6 11.1 3.3 7.1 10.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.2
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 6: Mare Island Way & Maine Street Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 40 0 34 10 624 41 71 380 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 40 0 34 10 624 41 71 380 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1856 1870 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 47 0 40 11 734 43 84 447 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.92 0.85 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22323233330
Cap, veh/h 213 221 0 422 0 187 26 1606 94 143 1909 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.54 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1367 1870 0 1767 0 1583 1781 3379 198 1767 3618 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 47 0 40 11 383 394 84 447 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1367 1870 0 1767 0 1583 1781 1763 1815 1767 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.2 4.9 4.9 1.5 2.2 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.2 4.9 4.9 1.5 2.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 213 221 0 422 0 187 26 838 862 143 1909 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.21 0.43 0.46 0.46 0.59 0.23 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 863 1109 0 1261 0 938 634 1568 1614 943 3135 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.5 0.0 13.5 16.5 5.9 5.9 15.0 4.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 10.7 0.8 0.8 3.8 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.1 1.1 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.6 0.0 14.0 27.2 6.8 6.7 18.8 4.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS A AABABCAABAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 87 788 531
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 13.8 7.0 6.5
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.2 20.0 7.5 4.0 22.3 7.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 30.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 6.9 0.0 2.2 4.2 2.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 9.1 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.3
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th TWSC Elite Charter School TIA
7: Maine Street & Sacramento Street Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 22 40 59 21 40 25
Future Vol, veh/h 22 40 59 21 40 25
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00002
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 33333
Mvmt Flow 24 44 66 23 44 28
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 89 0 - 0 170 80
Stage 1 - - - - 78 -
Stage 2 - - - - 92 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1500 - - - 818 977
Stage 1 - - - - 943 -
Stage 2 - - - - 929 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1500 - - - 805 975
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 805 -
Stage 1 - - - - 928 -
Stage 2 - - - - 929 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.6 0 9.6
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1500 - - - 863
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - - 0.084
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 9.6
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 340 110 0 451 166 227 159 10 161 91 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 340 110 0 451 166 227 159 10 161 91 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 370 120 0 490 53 143 319 0 175 99 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 033033333333
Cap, veh/h 0 1238 518 0 1176 516 648 1363 560 566 46
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3711 1552 0 3618 1547 1271 3711 0 879 1541 125 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 370 120 0 490 53 143 319 0 175 0 107 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 1552 0 1763 1547 1271 1856 0 879 0 1665 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 2.2 1.7 0.0 3.3 0.7 2.6 1.8 0.0 4.2 0.0 1.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 2.2 1.7 0.0 3.3 0.7 3.9 1.8 0.0 6.0 0.0 1.3 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1238 518 0 1176 516 648 1363 560 0 612 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.30 0.23 0.00 0.42 0.10 0.22 0.23 0.31 0.00 0.17 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 3659 1530 0 3476 1525 1226 3049 1071 0 1423 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 7.5 7.3 0.0 7.8 7.0 7.8 6.7 0.0 8.7 0.0 6.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 7.6 7.4 0.0 7.9 7.0 7.9 6.7 0.0 8.9 0.0 6.6 LnGrp LOS AAAAAAAA AAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 490 543 462 282
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.5 7.8 7.1 8.0
Approach LOS AAAA
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.1 15.4 15.1 15.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 * 4.2 4.9 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 * 26 30.0 * 25
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 8.0 5.3 5.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.6
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 1: Sonoma Boulevard & Florida Street Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 100 50 30 22 61 60 20 704 15 60 530 70 Future Volume (veh/h) 100 50 30 22 61 60 20 704 15 60 530 70 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 105 53 5 23 64 15 21 741 12 63 558 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 222 243 23 240 211 49 598 1393 1175 497 1393 1175 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Sat Flow, veh/h 1295 1667 157 1319 1449 340 797 1856 1565 704 1856 1565 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 105 0 58 23 0 79 21 741 12 63 558 62 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1295 0 1825 1319 0 1789 797 1856 1565 704 1856 1565 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.7 0.0 2.4 1.3 0.0 3.4 0.8 14.1 0.2 3.5 9.1 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.1 0.0 2.4 3.7 0.0 3.4 9.9 14.1 0.2 17.5 9.1 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 222 0 266 240 0 260 598 1393 1175 497 1393 1175 V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.00 0.22 0.10 0.00 0.30 0.04 0.53 0.01 0.13 0.40 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 369 0 472 389 0 463 598 1393 1175 497 1393 1175 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 37.0 0.0 32.0 33.7 0.0 32.5 5.5 4.4 2.7 8.0 3.8 2.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 1.1 0.4 0.0 1.5 0.1 4.5 0.0 0.5 2.6 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.5 0.0 32.2 33.7 0.0 32.7 5.6 5.6 2.7 8.1 3.8 2.8 LnGrp LOS D A C C A C A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 163 102 774 683
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.6 32.9 5.6 4.1
Approach LOS D C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 68.4 16.6 68.4 16.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.2 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 54.2 * 22 54.2 * 22
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 16.1 12.1 19.5 5.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.5
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 2: Mare Island Way & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 40 20 20 20 20 125 40 583 26 65 430 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 40 20 20 20 20 125 40 583 26 65 430 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.82 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 21 3 21 21 14 43 620 25 69 457 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 68 210 30 37 112 75 68 928 37 96 1009 20
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.27 0.27 0.05 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1546 221 1767 947 631 1767 3446 139 1767 3535 70 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 43 0 24 21 0 35 43 317 328 69 228 238 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 0 1767 1767 0 1578 1767 1763 1822 1767 1763 1842 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.8 0.9 6.2 6.2 1.5 4.1 4.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.8 0.9 6.2 6.2 1.5 4.1 4.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 68 0 240 37 0 187 68 475 491 96 503 525 V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.00 0.10 0.57 0.00 0.19 0.64 0.67 0.67 0.72 0.45 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 689 0 689 689 0 615 413 1558 1611 413 1558 1628 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.2 0.0 14.6 18.7 0.0 15.3 18.2 12.5 12.5 17.9 11.3 11.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.6 0.0 0.1 5.0 0.0 0.2 3.6 0.6 0.6 3.8 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.4 1.9 2.0 0.6 1.2 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 21.9 0.0 14.6 23.7 0.0 15.5 21.9 13.1 13.1 21.7 11.5 11.5 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 67 56 688 535
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.3 18.6 13.7 12.8
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.1 15.4 5.8 10.2 6.5 16.0 6.5 9.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 8.2 2.5 2.5 2.9 6.1 2.9 2.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.8
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 91 10 10 72 40 33 54 43 35 40 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 91 10 10 72 40 33 54 43 35 40 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25 112 7 12 89 24 41 67 20 43 49 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 238 593 33 197 519 129 288 231 57 333 231 22 Arrive On Green 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 137 1546 86 63 1355 337 359 1038 259 477 1041 99 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 144 0 0 125 0 0 128 0 0 98 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1768 0 0 1755 0 0 1656 0 0 1617 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.17 0.05 0.10 0.19 0.32 0.16 0.44 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 863 0 0 846 0 0 576 0 0 586 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2811 0 0 2809 0 0 2180 0 0 2125 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.7 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.8 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 144 125 128 98
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.8 4.7 7.6 7.4
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.2 9.6 13.2 9.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 28.0 35.0 28.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 3.4 3.2 3.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.0
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 22 128 19 47 80 30 22 55 29 30 68 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 22 128 19 47 80 30 22 55 29 30 68 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.95 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.93 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25 145 12 53 91 15 25 62 8 34 77 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 229 487 37 326 371 49 280 419 45 296 413 36
Arrive On Green 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 122 1529 117 325 1164 155 225 1346 144 262 1328 115 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 182 0 0 159 0 0 95 0 0 119 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1768 0 0 1644 0 0 1715 0 0 1705 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.14 0.07 0.33 0.09 0.26 0.08 0.29 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 753 0 0 746 0 0 744 0 0 745 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2587 0 0 2395 0 0 2114 0 0 2111 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.6 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.7 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 182 159 95 119
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.6
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.9 10.7 10.9 10.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 25.0 30.0 25.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.4 2.8 3.6 3.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 0.4 1.1 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.6
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 5: Sonoma Boulevard & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 55 145 24 26 101 80 35 591 58 90 377 51 Future Volume (veh/h) 55 145 24 26 101 80 35 591 58 90 377 51 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 148 18 27 103 14 36 603 33 92 385 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 101 195 21 88 272 274 119 1057 893 184 1126 931 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.57 0.57 0.10 0.61 0.61 Sat Flow, veh/h 268 1090 120 206 1522 1533 1767 1856 1567 1767 1856 1535 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 222 0 0 130 0 14 36 603 33 92 385 32 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1478 0 0 1728 0 1533 1767 1856 1567 1767 1856 1535 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.6 17.6 0.8 4.2 8.8 0.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.6 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.6 1.6 17.6 0.8 4.2 8.8 0.7 Prop In Lane 0.25 0.08 0.21 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 318 0 0 360 0 274 119 1057 893 184 1126 931 V/C Ratio(X) 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.05 0.30 0.57 0.04 0.50 0.34 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 524 0 0 572 0 469 249 1057 893 249 1126 931 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.97 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.0 0.0 0.0 30.8 0.0 28.9 37.7 11.7 8.0 36.0 8.3 6.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 2.2 0.1 0.7 0.8 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.5 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.2 0.7 7.2 0.3 1.8 3.4 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.0 0.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 28.9 38.3 13.9 8.1 36.7 9.1 6.8 LnGrp LOS C A A C A C D B A D A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 222 144 672 509
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.0 30.8 14.9 13.9
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.6 53.0 19.4 9.4 56.2 19.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 4.6 * 4.2 3.7 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 34.5 * 26 12.0 34.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.2 19.6 14.6 3.6 10.8 7.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.9
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 6: Mare Island Way & Maine Street Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 51 0 53 10 526 30 60 460 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 51 0 53 10 526 30 60 460 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 55 0 57 11 566 28 65 495 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 241 272 0 499 0 230 26 1418 70 123 1599 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.01 0.42 0.42 0.07 0.45 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1336 1856 0 1760 0 1568 1767 3415 169 1767 3618 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 55 0 57 11 292 302 65 495 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1336 1856 0 1760 0 1568 1767 1763 1821 1767 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.0 0.2 3.5 3.5 1.1 2.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.0 0.2 3.5 3.5 1.1 2.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 241 272 0 499 0 230 26 732 756 123 1599 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.25 0.43 0.40 0.40 0.53 0.31 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 941 1244 0 1421 0 1052 711 1773 1831 1066 3546 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 11.3 14.6 6.1 6.1 13.4 5.2 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 10.8 0.8 0.7 3.5 0.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 0.0 11.8 25.3 6.9 6.9 16.9 5.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A B A B C A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 112 605 560
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 11.6 7.2 6.7
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.6 16.4 7.9 4.4 17.5 7.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 30.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 5.5 0.0 2.2 4.7 3.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 6.9 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.4
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th TWSC Elite Charter School TIA
7: Maine Street & Sacramento Street Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 70 63 30 40 29
Future Vol, veh/h 10 70 63 30 40 29
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 4 2 7
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 11 80 72 34 46 33
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 110 0 - 0 197 100
Stage 1 - - - - 93 -
Stage 2 - - - - 104 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1474 - - - 789 953
Stage 1 - - - - 928 -
Stage 2 - - - - 918 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1468 - - - 776 943
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 776 -
Stage 1 - - - - 917 -
Stage 2 - - - - 914 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.9 0 9.7
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1468 - - - 838
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - - 0.095
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 9.7
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.3
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 412 131 0 343 203 263 382 30 227 158 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 412 131 0 343 203 263 382 30 227 158 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 429 136 0 357 66 232 457 0 236 165 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 1177 499 0 1118 498 613 1472 516 604 55
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.40 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3711 1572 0 3618 1570 1194 3711 0 729 1523 138 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 429 136 0 357 66 232 457 0 236 0 180 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 1572 0 1763 1570 1194 1856 0 729 0 1661 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 2.8 2.1 0.0 2.4 1.0 5.2 2.7 0.0 7.5 0.0 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 2.8 2.1 0.0 2.4 1.0 7.5 2.7 0.0 10.2 0.0 2.3 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1177 499 0 1118 498 613 1472 516 0 659 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.36 0.27 0.00 0.32 0.13 0.38 0.31 0.46 0.00 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 3502 1484 0 3327 1481 1078 2918 906 0 1359 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 8.4 8.1 0.0 8.2 7.7 9.0 6.6 0.0 10.1 0.0 6.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.9 0.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 8.5 8.2 0.0 8.3 7.8 9.2 6.6 0.0 10.3 0.0 6.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 565 423 689 A 416
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.4 8.2 7.5 8.7
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.0 16.8 15.0 16.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 * 4.2 4.9 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 * 26 30.0 * 25
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.8 12.2 4.4 9.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.1
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 1: Sonoma Boulevard & Florida Street Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 50 60 30 10 70 30 40 380 20 40 310 50 Future Volume (veh/h) 50 60 30 10 70 30 40 380 20 40 310 50 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 64 5 11 74 8 43 404 16 43 330 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 253 272 21 264 263 28 762 1341 1133 663 1341 1133 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.72 0.72 0.72 Sat Flow, veh/h 1306 1699 133 1321 1646 178 1005 1856 1568 959 1856 1568 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 0 69 11 0 82 43 404 16 43 330 38 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1306 0 1832 1321 0 1824 1005 1856 1568 959 1856 1568 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 0.0 2.5 0.5 0.0 3.0 1.8 9.9 0.4 1.4 4.5 0.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.8 0.0 2.5 3.0 0.0 3.0 6.3 9.9 0.4 11.3 4.5 0.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 253 0 293 264 0 292 762 1341 1133 663 1341 1133 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.00 0.24 0.04 0.00 0.28 0.06 0.30 0.01 0.06 0.25 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 427 0 537 440 0 535 762 1341 1133 663 1341 1133 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.2 0.0 27.5 28.8 0.0 27.7 8.3 7.9 5.5 6.6 3.5 3.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 1.1 0.2 0.0 1.3 0.4 4.1 0.1 0.3 1.3 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.4 0.0 27.6 28.8 0.0 27.9 8.4 8.5 5.5 6.6 3.5 3.0 LnGrp LOS C A C C A C A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 122 93 463 411
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.8 28.0 8.4 3.8
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.8 16.2 58.8 16.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.2 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 44.2 * 22 44.2 * 22
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.9 7.8 13.3 5.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.6
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 2: Mare Island Way & Georgia Street Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 10 10 20 20 40 20 740 20 50 540 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 10 10 20 20 40 20 740 20 50 540 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 11 1 22 22 3 22 804 20 54 587 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 39 130 12 39 123 17 39 1105 27 81 1201 20
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.31 0.31 0.05 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1658 151 1767 1575 215 1767 3512 87 1767 3545 60 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 0 12 22 0 25 22 403 421 54 292 305 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 0 1809 1767 0 1790 1767 1763 1837 1767 1763 1842 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 7.5 7.5 1.1 4.9 4.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 7.5 7.5 1.1 4.9 4.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 39 0 142 39 0 140 39 555 578 81 597 624 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.00 0.08 0.57 0.00 0.18 0.57 0.73 0.73 0.66 0.49 0.49 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 714 0 731 714 0 723 429 1615 1683 429 1615 1688 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.0 0.0 15.9 18.0 0.0 16.0 18.0 11.3 11.3 17.4 9.7 9.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.8 0.0 0.1 4.8 0.0 0.2 4.8 0.7 0.7 3.4 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 2.2 2.3 0.5 1.3 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 22.8 0.0 16.0 22.8 0.0 16.2 22.8 12.0 12.0 20.8 9.9 9.9 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C B B C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 34 47 846 651
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.4 19.3 12.3 10.8
Approach LOS C B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.7 16.7 5.8 7.9 5.8 17.6 5.8 7.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 9.5 2.5 2.2 2.5 6.9 2.5 2.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.1
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 50 20 30 60 20 10 40 20 30 40 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 50 20 30 60 20 10 40 20 30 40 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 59 13 35 71 13 12 47 3 35 47 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 239 572 112 337 513 76 249 210 13 344 149 3
Arrive On Green 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 93 1390 272 267 1248 186 266 1398 85 628 993 20 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 84 0 0 119 0 0 62 0 0 83 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1755 0 0 1701 0 0 1749 0 0 1641 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.14 0.15 0.29 0.11 0.19 0.05 0.42 0.01
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 922 0 0 927 0 0 472 0 0 495 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3112 0 0 3017 0 0 2554 0 0 2432 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.7 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.8 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 84 119 62 83
Approach Delay, s/veh 3.8 3.9 7.8 7.9
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.9 7.6 12.9 7.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 28.0 35.0 28.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.5
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 80 10 10 100 30 0 30 10 30 60 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 80 10 10 100 30 0 30 10 30 60 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 11 89 3 11 111 12 0 33 2 33 67 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 279 474 15 267 447 46 0 364 22 388 252 10
Arrive On Green 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 103 1637 52 80 1545 160 0 1730 105 432 1198 49 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 103 0 0 134 0 0 0 0 35 103 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1793 0 0 1784 0 0 0 0 1835 1679 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.11 0.03 0.08 0.09 0.00 0.06 0.32 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 768 0 0 760 0 0 0 0 386 650 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.16 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3547 0 0 3545 0 0 0 0 2869 2873 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.3 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 5.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.4 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 5.4 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 103 134 35 103
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.4 4.5 5.2 5.4
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.6 7.4 8.6 7.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 25.0 30.0 25.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 2.2 2.7 2.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 0.1 0.5 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 4.8
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 5: Sonoma Boulevard & Georgia Street Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 80 20 40 110 80 20 310 20 50 260 40 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 80 20 40 110 80 20 310 20 50 260 40 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 86 9 43 118 13 22 333 13 54 280 27 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 69 130 12 104 174 193 87 1141 966 159 1217 1031 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.61 0.61 0.09 0.66 0.66 Sat Flow, veh/h 93 1010 92 337 1359 1507 1767 1856 1571 1767 1856 1571 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 117 0 0 161 0 13 22 333 13 54 280 27 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1195 0 0 1696 0 1507 1767 1856 1571 1767 1856 1571 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.9 6.3 0.2 2.2 4.6 0.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.9 0.0 0.0 6.8 0.0 0.6 0.9 6.3 0.2 2.2 4.6 0.5 Prop In Lane 0.19 0.08 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 210 0 0 278 0 193 87 1141 966 159 1217 1031 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.07 0.25 0.29 0.01 0.34 0.23 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 576 0 0 640 0 522 259 1141 966 259 1217 1031 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.0 0.0 0.0 31.4 0.0 28.7 34.3 6.8 5.6 32.0 5.2 4.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.2 0.4 2.3 0.1 0.9 1.6 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.9 0.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 28.8 34.9 7.4 5.6 32.5 5.7 4.6 LnGrp LOS C A A C A C C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 117 174 368 361
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.9 31.8 9.0 9.6
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.5 50.7 13.8 7.4 53.8 13.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 4.6 * 4.2 3.7 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 25.5 * 26 11.0 25.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 8.3 9.9 2.9 6.6 8.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.7
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 6: Mare Island Way & Maine Street Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 40 0 30 10 760 50 90 470 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 40 0 30 10 760 50 90 470 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1856 1870 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 47 0 35 11 894 54 106 553 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.92 0.85 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 189 204 0 382 0 172 26 1731 105 157 2071 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.01 0.51 0.51 0.09 0.59 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1373 1870 0 1767 0 1582 1781 3372 204 1767 3618 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 47 0 35 11 467 481 106 553 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1373 1870 0 1767 0 1582 1781 1763 1813 1767 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.8 0.2 6.7 6.7 2.2 2.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.8 0.2 6.7 6.7 2.2 2.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 189 204 0 382 0 172 26 905 931 157 2071 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.20 0.43 0.52 0.52 0.68 0.27 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 762 984 0 1119 0 832 562 1390 1430 836 2781 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.5 0.0 15.4 18.6 6.1 6.1 16.8 3.8 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 10.9 1.0 1.0 5.0 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 1.5 1.6 1.0 0.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.0 16.0 29.5 7.1 7.1 21.8 4.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A B A B C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 82 959 659
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 15.8 7.4 6.9
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.9 23.5 7.6 4.0 26.3 7.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 30.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 8.7 0.0 2.2 4.9 2.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 10.8 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.6
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th TWSC Elite Charter School TIA
7: Maine Street & Sacramento Street Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.5
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 40 50 20 40 10
Future Vol, veh/h 20 40 50 20 40 10
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 22 44 56 22 44 11
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 78 0 - 0 155 69
Stage 1 - - - - 67 -
Stage 2 - - - - 88 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1514 - - - 834 991
Stage 1 - - - - 953 -
Stage 2 - - - - 933 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1514 - - - 821 989
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 821 -
Stage 1 - - - - 939 -
Stage 2 - - - - 933 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.5 0 9.5
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1514 - - - 850
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 - - - 0.065
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 9.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.2
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 380 120 0 480 170 240 160 10 170 90 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 380 120 0 480 170 240 160 10 170 90 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 413 130 0 522 63 308 109 0 185 98 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 1232 515 0 1171 514 1288 687 656 529 81
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3711 1552 0 3618 1547 2523 1856 0 1135 1429 219 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 413 130 0 522 63 308 109 0 185 0 113 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 1552 0 1763 1547 1261 1856 0 1135 0 1648 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 2.6 1.9 0.0 3.6 0.9 2.9 1.2 0.0 3.5 0.0 1.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 2.6 1.9 0.0 3.6 0.9 4.3 1.2 0.0 4.7 0.0 1.4 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.13
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1232 515 0 1171 514 1288 687 656 0 610 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.34 0.25 0.00 0.45 0.12 0.24 0.16 0.28 0.00 0.19 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 3641 1522 0 3459 1518 2416 1517 1265 0 1401 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 7.7 7.4 0.0 8.0 7.1 8.0 6.4 0.0 8.0 0.0 6.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 7.7 7.5 0.0 8.1 7.2 8.0 6.5 0.0 8.1 0.0 6.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 543 585 417 A 298
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.7 8.0 7.6 7.5
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.1 15.5 15.1 15.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 * 4.2 4.9 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 * 26 30.0 * 25
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.6 6.7 5.6 6.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.7
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 1: Sonoma Boulevard & Florida Street Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 110 60 30 20 70 60 20 740 10 60 560 80 Future Volume (veh/h) 110 60 30 20 70 60 20 740 10 60 560 80 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 116 63 8 21 74 22 21 779 8 63 589 71 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 232 262 33 253 223 66 553 1361 1148 454 1361 1148 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Sat Flow, veh/h 1277 1611 205 1306 1369 407 768 1856 1565 683 1856 1565 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 116 0 71 21 0 96 21 779 8 63 589 71 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1277 0 1816 1306 0 1776 768 1856 1565 683 1856 1565 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.5 0.0 2.9 1.2 0.0 4.1 0.9 16.4 0.1 4.0 10.5 1.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.6 0.0 2.9 4.1 0.0 4.1 11.5 16.4 0.1 20.3 10.5 1.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 232 0 296 253 0 289 553 1361 1148 454 1361 1148 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.00 0.24 0.08 0.00 0.33 0.04 0.57 0.01 0.14 0.43 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 354 0 470 378 0 460 553 1361 1148 454 1361 1148 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.6 0.0 31.0 32.8 0.0 31.5 6.7 5.2 3.0 9.9 4.4 3.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 0.0 1.3 0.4 0.0 1.8 0.2 5.4 0.0 0.6 3.2 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.2 0.0 31.2 32.8 0.0 31.7 6.8 6.7 3.0 9.9 4.5 3.2 LnGrp LOS D A C C A C A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 187 117 808 723
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.9 31.9 6.6 4.8
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 67.0 18.0 67.0 18.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.2 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 54.2 * 22 54.2 * 22
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.4 13.6 22.3 6.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.1 0.9 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.4
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 2: Mare Island Way & Georgia Street Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 40 30 20 30 20 130 40 730 20 70 540 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 40 30 20 30 20 130 40 730 20 70 540 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 32 2 32 21 14 43 777 19 74 574 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 66 236 15 52 124 83 66 1068 26 97 1139 20
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.30 0.30 0.05 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1706 107 1767 956 637 1767 3512 86 1767 3544 62 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 43 0 34 32 0 35 43 390 406 74 285 299 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 0 1813 1767 0 1593 1767 1763 1835 1767 1763 1843 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.0 8.4 8.4 1.7 5.5 5.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.0 8.4 8.4 1.7 5.5 5.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 66 0 250 52 0 207 66 536 558 97 567 593 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.14 0.61 0.00 0.17 0.65 0.73 0.73 0.76 0.50 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 627 0 644 627 0 565 376 1418 1477 376 1418 1483 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.1 0.0 16.0 20.3 0.0 16.3 20.1 13.1 13.1 19.7 11.6 11.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 0.0 0.1 4.2 0.0 0.1 3.9 0.7 0.7 4.6 0.3 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 2.6 2.7 0.7 1.7 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.0 0.0 16.1 24.5 0.0 16.5 24.0 13.9 13.8 24.3 11.9 11.9 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 77 67 839 658
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.5 20.3 14.4 13.3
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.3 17.8 6.3 10.8 6.6 18.6 6.6 10.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 10.4 2.8 2.7 3.0 7.5 3.0 2.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.4
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 90 20 20 70 50 30 60 30 40 50 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 90 20 20 70 50 30 60 30 40 50 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25 111 15 25 86 34 37 74 15 49 62 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 234 556 67 236 452 154 277 253 44 324 225 29 Arrive On Green 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 129 1447 174 131 1176 400 327 1148 199 460 1023 134 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 151 0 0 145 0 0 126 0 0 121 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1750 0 0 1707 0 0 1674 0 0 1616 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.17 0.10 0.17 0.23 0.29 0.12 0.40 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 857 0 0 841 0 0 574 0 0 578 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2792 0 0 2726 0 0 2202 0 0 2136 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.7 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.8 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 151 145 126 121
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.8 4.8 7.6 7.6
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.2 9.5 13.2 9.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 28.0 35.0 28.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.1
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 120 10 20 90 30 20 60 20 30 70 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 30 120 10 20 90 30 20 60 20 30 70 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.95 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.93 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 34 136 6 23 102 12 23 68 6 34 80 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 258 472 19 241 454 48 270 448 34 293 417 39
Arrive On Green 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 184 1506 60 145 1448 153 201 1426 107 253 1327 125 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 176 0 0 137 0 0 97 0 0 123 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1750 0 0 1746 0 0 1734 0 0 1705 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.19 0.03 0.17 0.09 0.24 0.06 0.28 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 749 0 0 743 0 0 752 0 0 750 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2568 0 0 2556 0 0 2148 0 0 2122 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.6 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.8 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 176 137 97 123
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.5
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.7 10.8 10.7 10.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 25.0 30.0 25.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 2.8 3.6 3.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 0.4 1.1 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.6
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 5: Sonoma Boulevard & Georgia Street Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 40 140 20 20 100 90 30 630 50 100 410 50 Future Volume (veh/h) 40 140 20 20 100 90 30 630 50 100 410 50 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 41 143 14 20 102 15 31 643 30 102 418 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 85 194 17 74 259 241 108 1091 922 189 1176 973 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.59 0.59 0.11 0.63 0.63 Sat Flow, veh/h 215 1226 110 158 1640 1528 1767 1856 1567 1767 1856 1535 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 198 0 0 122 0 15 31 643 30 102 418 33 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1551 0 0 1798 0 1528 1767 1856 1567 1767 1856 1535 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.4 18.6 0.7 4.6 9.0 0.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.7 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.7 1.4 18.6 0.7 4.6 9.0 0.7 Prop In Lane 0.21 0.07 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 296 0 0 333 0 241 108 1091 922 189 1176 973 V/C Ratio(X) 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.06 0.29 0.59 0.03 0.54 0.36 0.03 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 541 0 0 586 0 467 249 1091 922 249 1176 973 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.97 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 34.6 0.0 0.0 32.3 0.0 30.4 38.1 11.0 7.4 36.0 7.3 5.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 2.3 0.1 0.8 0.8 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 7.4 0.2 2.0 3.4 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 35.6 0.0 0.0 32.5 0.0 30.5 38.7 13.4 7.4 36.8 8.1 5.9 LnGrp LOS D A A C A C D B A D A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 198 137 704 553
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.6 32.3 14.2 13.3
Approach LOS D C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.8 54.6 17.6 8.9 58.5 17.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 4.6 * 4.2 3.7 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 34.5 * 26 12.0 34.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.6 20.6 12.7 3.4 11.0 7.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.1
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 6: Mare Island Way & Maine Street Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 50 0 60 10 650 40 80 580 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 50 0 60 10 650 40 80 580 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 54 0 65 11 699 39 86 624 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 211 265 0 463 0 224 26 1536 86 144 1782 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.51 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1326 1856 0 1760 0 1568 1767 3390 189 1767 3618 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 54 0 65 11 363 375 86 624 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1326 1856 0 1760 0 1568 1767 1763 1817 1767 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.3 0.2 4.8 4.9 1.6 3.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.3 0.2 4.8 4.9 1.6 3.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 265 0 463 0 224 26 799 823 144 1782 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.29 0.43 0.45 0.46 0.60 0.35 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 798 1087 0 1242 0 919 621 1549 1596 932 3098 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 13.1 16.7 6.4 6.4 15.1 5.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.7 10.9 0.9 0.8 3.9 0.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.1 1.1 1.2 0.7 0.7 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 13.8 27.6 7.3 7.3 19.0 5.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A B A B C A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 119 749 710
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 13.4 7.6 7.0
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.3 19.5 8.4 4.5 21.3 8.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 30.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 6.9 0.0 2.2 5.6 3.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 8.6 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.8
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th TWSC Elite Charter School TIA
7: Maine Street & Sacramento Street Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 80 60 30 50 20
Future Vol, veh/h 10 80 60 30 50 20
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 4 2 7
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 11 92 69 34 57 23
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 107 0 - 0 206 97
Stage 1 - - - - 90 -
Stage 2 - - - - 116 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1478 - - - 780 956
Stage 1 - - - - 931 -
Stage 2 - - - - 906 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1472 - - - 768 946
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 768 -
Stage 1 - - - - 920 -
Stage 2 - - - - 902 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.8 0 9.9
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1472 - - - 812
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - - 0.099
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 9.9
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.3
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 450 150 0 370 220 280 420 40 240 170 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 450 150 0 370 220 280 420 40 240 170 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 469 156 0 385 69 255 490 0 250 177 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 1127 478 0 1071 477 626 1567 517 644 58
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.42 0.42 0.42 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3711 1572 0 3618 1569 1180 3711 0 712 1524 138 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 469 156 0 385 69 255 490 0 250 0 193 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 1572 0 1763 1569 1180 1856 0 712 0 1662 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 3.3 2.5 0.0 2.8 1.1 6.0 2.9 0.0 8.5 0.0 2.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 3.3 2.5 0.0 2.8 1.1 8.5 2.9 0.0 11.4 0.0 2.5 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1127 478 0 1071 477 626 1567 517 0 702 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.42 0.33 0.00 0.36 0.14 0.41 0.31 0.48 0.00 0.28 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 3352 1421 0 3185 1418 1016 2794 842 0 1301 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 9.2 8.9 0.0 9.0 8.4 9.0 6.4 0.0 10.2 0.0 6.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.9 0.6 0.0 0.7 0.2 1.1 0.7 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 9.3 9.1 0.0 9.1 8.5 9.2 6.4 0.0 10.4 0.0 6.3 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 625 454 745 A 443
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.3 9.0 7.4 8.7
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.0 18.2 15.0 18.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 * 4.2 4.9 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 * 26 30.0 * 25
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.3 13.4 4.8 10.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.5
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 1: Sonoma Boulevard & Florida Street Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 50 60 30 16 72 30 40 409 25 40 361 50 Future Volume (veh/h) 50 60 30 16 72 30 40 409 25 40 361 50 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 64 5 17 77 8 43 435 21 43 384 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 251 272 21 264 264 27 717 1341 1133 633 1341 1133 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.72 0.72 0.72 Sat Flow, veh/h 1302 1699 133 1321 1653 172 955 1856 1568 927 1856 1568 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 0 69 17 0 85 43 435 21 43 384 40 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1302 0 1832 1321 0 1825 955 1856 1568 927 1856 1568 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 0.0 2.5 0.9 0.0 3.1 2.0 10.8 0.5 1.5 5.4 0.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.9 0.0 2.5 3.3 0.0 3.1 7.4 10.8 0.5 12.3 5.4 0.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 251 0 293 264 0 292 717 1341 1133 633 1341 1133 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.00 0.24 0.06 0.00 0.29 0.06 0.32 0.02 0.07 0.29 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 425 0 537 440 0 535 717 1341 1133 633 1341 1133 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.3 0.0 27.5 28.9 0.0 27.8 8.9 8.1 5.5 7.0 3.6 3.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 1.1 0.3 0.0 1.3 0.4 4.7 0.1 0.3 1.5 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.5 0.0 27.6 29.0 0.0 28.0 9.0 8.8 5.5 7.0 3.7 3.0 LnGrp LOS C A C C A C A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 122 102 499 467
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.9 28.1 8.6 3.9
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.8 16.2 58.8 16.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.2 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 44.2 * 22 44.2 * 22
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.8 7.9 14.3 5.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.5
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 2: Mare Island Way & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 10 10 20 20 44 20 744 34 64 541 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 10 10 20 20 44 20 744 34 64 541 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 22 11 1 22 22 3 22 809 33 70 588 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 39 130 12 39 123 17 39 1099 45 97 1248 21
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.32 0.32 0.05 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1658 151 1767 1574 215 1767 3447 141 1767 3545 60 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 22 0 12 22 0 25 22 414 428 70 292 306 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 0 1809 1767 0 1789 1767 1763 1825 1767 1763 1842 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 7.9 7.9 1.5 4.9 4.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 7.9 7.9 1.5 4.9 4.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 39 0 141 39 0 140 39 562 582 97 620 648 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.00 0.08 0.57 0.00 0.18 0.57 0.74 0.74 0.72 0.47 0.47 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 697 0 714 697 0 706 418 1577 1633 418 1577 1648 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.4 0.0 16.3 18.4 0.0 16.4 18.4 11.5 11.5 17.7 9.6 9.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.9 0.0 0.1 4.9 0.0 0.2 4.9 0.7 0.7 3.7 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 2.3 2.4 0.6 1.3 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.3 0.0 16.4 23.3 0.0 16.6 23.3 12.2 12.2 21.4 9.8 9.8 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C B B C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 34 47 864 668
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.8 19.7 12.5 11.0
Approach LOS C B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.1 17.1 5.8 8.0 5.8 18.4 5.8 8.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 9.9 2.5 2.2 2.5 6.9 2.5 2.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.3
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 76 22 30 60 20 14 46 40 38 41 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 76 22 30 60 20 14 46 40 38 41 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.97 0.99 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 12 89 14 35 71 13 16 54 5 45 48 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 219 604 88 330 503 75 255 220 19 366 151 3
Arrive On Green 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow, veh/h 70 1491 216 264 1242 185 276 1344 116 680 920 17 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 115 0 0 119 0 0 75 0 0 94 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1777 0 0 1692 0 0 1736 0 0 1617 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.10 0.12 0.29 0.11 0.21 0.07 0.48 0.01
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 910 0 0 908 0 0 494 0 0 520 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3110 0 0 2941 0 0 2492 0 0 2355 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.9 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 115 119 75 94
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.0 4.0 7.7 7.9
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.9 7.9 12.9 7.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 28.0 35.0 28.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.9 2.7 2.8 3.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.6
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 108 32 68 100 31 0 30 10 30 82 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 108 32 68 100 31 0 30 10 30 82 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.96 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 120 18 76 111 22 0 33 2 33 91 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 254 476 67 407 338 55 0 389 24 327 300 15
Arrive On Green 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 91 1467 206 401 1042 170 0 1730 105 319 1335 67 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 154 0 0 209 0 0 0 0 35 129 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1764 0 0 1613 0 0 0 0 1835 1720 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.10 0.12 0.36 0.11 0.00 0.06 0.26 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 796 0 0 800 0 0 0 0 412 641 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.20 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 3150 0 0 2899 0 0 0 0 2588 2630 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.4 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 5.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 5.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 154 209 35 129
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.5 4.7 5.5 5.9
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.7 8.0 9.7 8.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 25.0 30.0 25.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 2.3 3.1 3.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.3 0.1 0.9 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.0
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 5: Sonoma Boulevard & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 31 89 28 49 145 80 29 333 33 50 280 67 Future Volume (veh/h) 31 89 28 49 145 80 29 333 33 50 280 67 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 96 16 53 156 15 31 358 20 54 301 44 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 76 144 20 111 221 256 112 1065 902 159 1115 944 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.06 0.57 0.57 0.09 0.60 0.60 Sat Flow, veh/h 100 854 118 300 1310 1515 1767 1856 1571 1767 1856 1571 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 145 0 0 209 0 15 31 358 20 54 301 44 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1072 0 0 1610 0 1515 1767 1856 1571 1767 1856 1571 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.3 7.6 0.4 2.2 5.8 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.8 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.6 1.3 7.6 0.4 2.2 5.8 0.9 Prop In Lane 0.23 0.11 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 240 0 0 332 0 256 112 1065 902 159 1115 944 V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.06 0.28 0.34 0.02 0.34 0.27 0.05 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 528 0 0 627 0 525 259 1065 902 259 1115 944 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.98 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.1 0.0 0.0 29.5 0.0 26.2 33.5 8.4 6.9 32.0 7.1 6.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.9 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.6 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.2 0.5 2.9 0.1 0.9 2.1 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.0 0.0 0.0 30.3 0.0 26.2 34.0 9.3 6.9 32.5 7.7 6.2 LnGrp LOS C A A C A C C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 145 224 409 399
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.0 30.0 11.0 10.9
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.5 47.7 16.9 8.5 49.7 16.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 4.6 * 4.2 3.7 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 25.5 * 26 11.0 25.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 9.6 12.8 3.3 7.8 11.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.9
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 6: Mare Island Way & Maine Street Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 40 0 34 10 774 51 91 470 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 40 0 34 10 774 51 91 470 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1856 1870 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 47 0 40 11 911 55 107 553 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.85 0.92 0.85 0.92 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 186 210 0 384 0 177 26 1737 105 156 2077 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.01 0.52 0.52 0.09 0.59 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1367 1870 0 1767 0 1582 1781 3373 204 1767 3618 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 47 0 40 11 476 490 107 553 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1367 1870 0 1767 0 1582 1781 1763 1813 1767 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.2 6.9 6.9 2.3 3.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.2 6.9 6.9 2.3 3.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 186 210 0 384 0 177 26 908 934 156 2077 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.23 0.43 0.52 0.52 0.69 0.27 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 740 967 0 1100 0 818 553 1367 1407 823 2735 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.0 15.6 18.9 6.2 6.2 17.1 3.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 10.9 1.0 1.0 5.2 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 1.6 1.7 1.0 0.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 0.0 16.3 29.8 7.2 7.2 22.3 4.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A B A B C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 87 977 660
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 16.0 7.5 7.0
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.9 23.9 7.8 4.1 26.8 7.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 30.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.3 8.9 0.0 2.2 5.0 2.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 11.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.7
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th TWSC Elite Charter School TIA
7: Maine Street & Sacramento Street Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.6
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 22 40 69 21 40 25
Future Vol, veh/h 22 40 69 21 40 25
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 2
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 24 44 77 23 44 28
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 100 0 - 0 181 91
Stage 1 - - - - 89 -
Stage 2 - - - - 92 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1486 - - - 806 964
Stage 1 - - - - 932 -
Stage 2 - - - - 929 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1486 - - - 792 962
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 792 -
Stage 1 - - - - 916 -
Stage 2 - - - - 929 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.6 0 9.6
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1486 - - - 850
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - - 0.085
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 9.6
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 380 120 0 491 176 247 169 10 181 101 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 380 120 0 491 176 247 169 10 181 101 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 413 130 0 534 62 302 137 0 197 110 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 1225 512 0 1164 511 1276 694 635 549 70
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3711 1552 0 3618 1547 2498 1856 1572 1072 1467 187 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 413 130 0 534 62 302 137 0 197 0 124 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 1552 0 1763 1547 1249 1856 1572 1072 0 1654 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 2.6 1.9 0.0 3.7 0.9 2.9 1.5 0.0 3.9 0.0 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 2.6 1.9 0.0 3.7 0.9 4.4 1.5 0.0 5.5 0.0 1.6 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1225 512 0 1164 511 1276 694 635 0 619 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.34 0.25 0.00 0.46 0.12 0.24 0.20 0.31 0.00 0.20 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 3619 1513 0 3438 1509 2372 1508 1218 0 1398 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 7.8 7.5 0.0 8.1 7.2 8.0 6.5 0.0 8.4 0.0 6.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 7.8 7.6 0.0 8.2 7.2 8.0 6.6 0.0 8.5 0.0 6.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 543 596 439 A 321
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.8 8.1 7.6 7.7
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.1 15.7 15.1 15.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 * 4.2 4.9 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 * 26 30.0 * 25
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.6 7.5 5.7 6.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.8
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 1: Sonoma Boulevard & Florida Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 110 60 30 22 71 60 20 774 15 60 580 80 Future Volume (veh/h) 110 60 30 22 71 60 20 774 15 60 580 80 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 116 63 8 23 75 23 21 815 12 63 611 71 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 231 264 34 254 223 68 537 1359 1146 429 1359 1146 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Sat Flow, veh/h 1275 1611 205 1306 1358 416 752 1856 1565 657 1856 1565 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 116 0 71 23 0 98 21 815 12 63 611 71 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1275 0 1816 1306 0 1775 752 1856 1565 657 1856 1565 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.5 0.0 2.9 1.3 0.0 4.2 1.0 17.8 0.2 4.3 11.2 1.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.7 0.0 2.9 4.2 0.0 4.2 12.1 17.8 0.2 22.1 11.2 1.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 231 0 298 254 0 291 537 1359 1146 429 1359 1146 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.00 0.24 0.09 0.00 0.34 0.04 0.60 0.01 0.15 0.45 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 352 0 470 378 0 459 537 1359 1146 429 1359 1146 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.6 0.0 30.9 32.8 0.0 31.4 7.0 5.4 3.1 10.7 4.5 3.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 0.0 1.3 0.4 0.0 1.8 0.2 5.9 0.0 0.6 3.4 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.2 0.0 31.1 32.8 0.0 31.7 7.1 7.0 3.1 10.7 4.6 3.2 LnGrp LOS D A C C A C A A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 187 121 848 745
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.9 31.9 6.9 5.0
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 66.9 18.1 66.9 18.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.2 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 54.2 * 22 54.2 * 22
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.8 13.7 24.1 6.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.1 0.9 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.5
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 2: Mare Island Way & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 40 30 20 30 20 135 40 733 26 75 540 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 40 30 20 30 20 135 40 733 26 75 540 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 32 2 32 21 14 43 780 26 80 574 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 66 235 15 52 124 83 66 1065 36 101 1157 20
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1706 107 1767 956 637 1767 3475 116 1767 3544 62 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 43 0 34 32 0 35 43 396 410 80 285 299 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 0 1813 1767 0 1593 1767 1763 1828 1767 1763 1843 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.0 8.6 8.6 1.9 5.6 5.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.0 8.6 8.6 1.9 5.6 5.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 66 0 250 52 0 207 66 540 560 101 576 602 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.14 0.61 0.00 0.17 0.65 0.73 0.73 0.79 0.50 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 621 0 637 621 0 560 373 1404 1457 373 1404 1469 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.3 0.0 16.2 20.5 0.0 16.5 20.3 13.2 13.2 19.9 11.5 11.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.0 0.0 0.1 4.3 0.0 0.1 4.0 0.7 0.7 5.0 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 2.7 2.8 0.8 1.7 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.2 0.0 16.3 24.7 0.0 16.7 24.2 14.0 13.9 24.9 11.8 11.8 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 77 67 849 664
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.7 20.5 14.5 13.4
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.5 18.1 6.3 10.9 6.6 18.9 6.6 10.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 10.6 2.8 2.7 3.0 7.6 3.0 2.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.6
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 101 20 20 72 50 33 64 43 45 50 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 101 20 20 72 50 33 64 43 45 50 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25 125 16 25 89 34 41 79 25 56 62 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 223 553 64 230 447 148 271 253 68 336 232 32 Arrive On Green 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 119 1468 169 129 1186 392 307 1072 287 482 984 137 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 166 0 0 148 0 0 145 0 0 129 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1756 0 0 1707 0 0 1666 0 0 1602 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.15 0.10 0.17 0.23 0.28 0.17 0.43 0.09
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 840 0 0 824 0 0 592 0 0 600 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2747 0 0 2668 0 0 2146 0 0 2068 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.1 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 166 148 145 129
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.1 5.0 7.6 7.5
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.3 10.0 13.3 10.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 28.0 35.0 28.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 3.6 3.5 3.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.2
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 32 138 19 47 90 30 22 65 29 30 78 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 32 138 19 47 90 30 22 65 29 30 78 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.95 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.93 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 36 157 14 53 102 19 25 74 8 34 89 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 244 469 38 308 376 58 264 444 41 279 432 37
Arrive On Green 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 165 1461 118 297 1172 180 198 1400 129 235 1362 117 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 207 0 0 174 0 0 107 0 0 132 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1744 0 0 1649 0 0 1728 0 0 1714 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.17 0.07 0.30 0.11 0.23 0.07 0.26 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 751 0 0 742 0 0 749 0 0 748 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2493 0 0 2348 0 0 2082 0 0 2073 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.7 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.9 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 207 174 107 132
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.9 5.8 5.6 5.7
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.1 11.0 11.1 11.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 25.0 30.0 25.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 2.9 3.9 3.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.5 1.3 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.8
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 5: Sonoma Boulevard & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 55 155 24 26 111 90 35 651 58 100 417 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 55 155 24 26 111 90 35 651 58 100 417 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 158 18 27 113 16 36 664 33 102 426 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 100 205 21 86 286 285 119 1039 877 189 1113 920 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.56 0.56 0.11 0.60 0.60 Sat Flow, veh/h 253 1104 114 189 1538 1534 1767 1856 1567 1767 1856 1535 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 232 0 0 140 0 16 36 664 33 102 426 36 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1471 0 0 1727 0 1534 1767 1856 1567 1767 1856 1535 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.6 20.8 0.8 4.6 10.1 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.3 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.7 1.6 20.8 0.8 4.6 10.1 0.8 Prop In Lane 0.24 0.08 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 326 0 0 372 0 285 119 1039 877 189 1113 920 V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.06 0.30 0.64 0.04 0.54 0.38 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 521 0 0 573 0 469 249 1039 877 249 1113 920 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.96 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.7 0.0 0.0 30.5 0.0 28.5 37.7 12.8 8.4 36.0 8.8 7.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 3.0 0.1 0.8 0.9 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.7 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.3 0.7 8.7 0.3 2.0 3.9 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.8 0.0 0.0 30.7 0.0 28.5 38.3 15.8 8.5 36.8 9.7 7.0 LnGrp LOS C A A C A C D B A D A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 232 156 733 564
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.8 30.5 16.6 14.5
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.8 52.2 20.0 9.4 55.6 20.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 4.6 * 4.2 3.7 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 34.5 * 26 12.0 34.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.6 22.8 15.3 3.6 12.1 7.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.7
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 6: Mare Island Way & Maine Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 51 0 63 10 656 40 80 580 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 51 0 63 10 656 40 80 580 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 55 0 68 11 705 39 86 624 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 209 269 0 464 0 227 26 1539 85 144 1785 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.51 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1322 1856 0 1760 0 1568 1767 3392 188 1767 3618 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 55 0 68 11 366 378 86 624 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1322 1856 0 1760 0 1568 1767 1763 1817 1767 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.3 0.2 4.9 4.9 1.6 3.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.3 0.2 4.9 4.9 1.6 3.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 209 269 0 464 0 227 26 800 824 144 1785 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.30 0.43 0.46 0.46 0.60 0.35 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 787 1079 0 1233 0 912 617 1537 1585 925 3075 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 13.1 16.8 6.5 6.5 15.3 5.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.7 10.9 0.9 0.9 3.9 0.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.1 1.2 1.2 0.7 0.7 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.1 0.0 13.9 27.8 7.4 7.3 19.2 5.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A B A B C A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 123 755 710
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 13.5 7.6 7.0
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.3 19.6 8.5 4.5 21.4 8.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 30.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 6.9 0.0 2.2 5.7 3.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 8.6 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.8
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
HCM 6th TWSC Elite Charter School TIA
7: Maine Street & Sacramento Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 80 73 30 50 29
Future Vol, veh/h 10 80 73 30 50 29
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 4 2 7
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 11 92 84 34 57 33
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 122 0 - 0 221 112
Stage 1 - - - - 105 -
Stage 2 - - - - 116 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1459 - - - 765 938
Stage 1 - - - - 917 -
Stage 2 - - - - 906 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1453 - - - 753 928
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 753 -
Stage 1 - - - - 906 -
Stage 2 - - - - 902 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.8 0 10
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1453 - - - 809
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - - 0.112
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 10
HCM Lane LOS A A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.4
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 452 151 0 373 223 283 422 40 247 178 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 452 151 0 373 223 283 422 40 247 178 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 471 157 0 389 71 197 577 0 257 185 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 1051 445 0 998 444 656 1712 503 706 61
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.28 0.46 0.46 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.46 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3711 1572 0 3618 1569 1171 3711 1572 651 1530 132 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 471 157 0 389 71 197 577 0 257 0 201 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 1572 0 1763 1569 1171 1856 1572 651 0 1663 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 3.7 2.8 0.0 3.2 1.2 4.4 3.5 0.0 10.2 0.0 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 3.7 2.8 0.0 3.2 1.2 7.1 3.5 0.0 13.7 0.0 2.6 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1051 445 0 998 444 656 1712 503 0 767 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.45 0.35 0.00 0.39 0.16 0.30 0.34 0.51 0.00 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 3124 1324 0 2968 1321 937 2604 725 0 1213 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 10.5 10.2 0.0 10.3 9.6 8.0 6.1 0.0 10.5 0.0 5.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 1.1 0.7 0.0 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 10.6 10.3 0.0 10.4 9.6 8.1 6.2 0.0 10.8 0.0 5.9 LnGrp LOS A B B A B A A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 628 460 774 A 458
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.5 10.3 6.7 8.7
Approach LOS B B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.0 20.6 15.0 20.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 * 4.2 4.9 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 * 26 30.0 * 25
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.7 15.7 5.2 9.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.8
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.
Appendix C:
Signal Warrants
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Exisiting
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 32 11 North/South
Through 33 38 x East/West
Right 6 13
Total 0 38 44 51
1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.
Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.
Traffic Volume (VPH) * 9 5 38
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.
Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Exisiting
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 0 32 11 0 North/South
Through 0 0 33 38 x East/West
Right 0 6 0 13
Total 0 38 44 51
Intersection Geometry
1 3
9.2 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
38 Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Exisiting
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met
0.1 38 133
4 100 650
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Exisiting
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 40 9 North/South
Through 69 49 x East/West
Right 13 21
Total 0 53 78 70
1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.
Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.
Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 48 53
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.
Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Exisiting
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 9 0 North/South
Through 0 0 69 49 x East/West
Right 0 13 0 21
Total 0 53 78 70
Intersection Geometry
1 3
9.6 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
53 Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Exisiting
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met
0.1 53 201
4 100 650
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 40 20 North/South
Through 40 40 x East/West
Right 10 20
Total 0 50 60 60
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.
Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.
Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 20 50
0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.
Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 20 0 North/South
Through 0 0 40 40 x East/West
Right 0 10 0 20
Total 0 50 60 60
Intersection Geometry
1 3
9.5 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
50 Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met
0.1 50 170
4 100 650
Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
T
otal Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Opening Year
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 40 10 North/South
Through 70 50 x East/West
Right 20 30
Total 0 60 80 80
1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.
Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.
Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 60 60
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.
Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 10 0 North/South
Through 0 0 70 50 x East/West
Right 0 20 0 30
Total 0 60 80 80
Intersection Geometry
1 3
9.7 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
60 Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Opening Year
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met
0.2 60 220
4 100 650
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 40 22 North/South
Through 40 59 x East/West
Right 25 21
Total 0 65 62 80
1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.
Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.
Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 42 65
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.
Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 22 0 North/South
Through 0 0 40 59 x East/West
Right 0 25 0 21
Total 0 65 62 80
Intersection Geometry
1 3
9.6 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
65 Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Opening Year Plus Project
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met
0.2 65 207
4 100 650
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 40 10 North/South
Through 70 63 x East/West
Right 29 30
Total 0 69 80 93
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.
Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.
Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 73 69
0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.
Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 10 0 North/South
Through 0 0 70 63 x East/West
Right 0 29 0 30
Total 0 69 80 93
Intersection Geometry
1 3
9.7 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
69 Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met
0.2 69 242
4 100 650
Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
T
otal Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Opening Year Plus Project
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 40 20 North/South
Through 40 50 x East/West
Right 10 20
Total 0 50 60 70
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.
Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.
Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 30 50
0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.
Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 20 0 North/South
Through 0 0 40 50 x East/West
Right 0 10 0 20
Total 0 50 60 70
Intersection Geometry
1 3
9.5 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
50 Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met
0.1 50 180
4 100 650
Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
T
otal Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Cumulative
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 50 10 North/South
Through 80 60 x East/West
Right 20 30
Total 0 70 90 90
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.
Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.
Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 80 70
0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.
Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 0 50 10 0 North/South
Through 0 0 80 60 x East/West
Right 0 20 0 30
Total 0 70 90 90
Intersection Geometry
1 3
9.9 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
70 Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met
0.2 70 250
4 100 650
Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
T
otal Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Cumulative
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 40 22 North/South
Through 40 69 x East/West
Right 25 21
Total 0 65 62 90
1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.
Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.
Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 52 65
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.
Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 22 0 North/South
Through 0 0 40 69 x East/West
Right 0 25 0 21
Total 0 65 62 90
Intersection Geometry
1 3
9.6 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
65 Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Cumulative Plus Project
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met
0.2 65 217
4 100 650
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 50 10 North/South
Through 80 30 x East/West
Right 29 73
Total 0 79 90 103
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.
Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.
Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 93 79
0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.
Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction
NB SB EB WB
Left 0 50 10 0 North/South
Through 0 0 80 30 x East/West
Right 0 29 0 73
Total 0 79 90 103
Intersection Geometry
1 3
10 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
79 Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met
0.2 79 272
4 100 650
Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
T
otal Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Cumulative Plus Project
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Appendix D:
Vehicle Queues
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Existing AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 63 108 62 64
v/c Ratio 0.04 0.07 0.10 0.10
Control Delay 2.7 2.7 4.2 4.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 2.7 2.7 4.2 4.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 3 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 19 12 13
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1745 1675 1780 1826
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.04
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Existing AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 78 123 31 90
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.15 0.03 0.11
Control Delay 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 20 8 16
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1688 1729 1816 1810
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.07 0.02 0.05
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Existing PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 123 128 117 102
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.19 0.15
Control Delay 4.5 3.8 5.2 5.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.5 3.8 5.2 5.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 21 18 20 18
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1739 1675 1562 1673
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.06
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Existing PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 147 132 83 108
v/c Ratio 0.19 0.17 0.09 0.12
Control Delay 4.8 4.3 4.4 4.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.8 4.3 4.4 4.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 26 21 16 20
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1679 1646 1763 1773
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.06
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 83 130 83 82
v/c Ratio 0.06 0.09 0.10 0.10
Control Delay 2.5 2.6 3.4 3.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 2.5 2.6 3.4 3.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 1 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 22 15 16
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1689 1653 1761 1801
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.08 0.05 0.05
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 100 133 44 100
v/c Ratio 0.13 0.17 0.05 0.13
Control Delay 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 22 10 18
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1746 1719 1771 1808
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.06
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 136 147 136 111
v/c Ratio 0.13 0.14 0.25 0.21
Control Delay 5.9 4.8 6.4 6.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 5.9 4.8 6.4 6.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 8 9 7
Queue Length 95th (ft) 25 21 23 20
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1696 1690 1526 1479
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.08
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 159 148 103 125
v/c Ratio 0.18 0.17 0.11 0.16
Control Delay 4.6 4.1 4.4 4.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.6 4.1 4.4 4.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 24 19 23
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1670 1608 1739 1748
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.07
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 116 130 117 93
v/c Ratio 0.09 0.11 0.18 0.13
Control Delay 4.1 4.3 4.5 5.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.1 4.3 4.5 5.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 22 19 18
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1723 1634 1616 1807
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.05
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 199 44 124
v/c Ratio 0.23 0.33 0.07 0.21
Control Delay 5.3 6.7 5.7 6.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 5.3 6.7 5.7 6.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 13 2 9
Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 38 12 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1691 1472 1724 1581
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.14 0.03 0.08
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 149 150 161 117
v/c Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.28 0.22
Control Delay 6.1 5.0 6.4 6.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.1 5.0 6.4 6.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 8 10 8
Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 23 27 22
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1707 1691 1518 1433
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.08
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 178 121 134
v/c Ratio 0.27 0.28 0.17 0.22
Control Delay 6.1 6.0 5.3 6.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.1 6.0 5.3 6.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 11 6 8
Queue Length 95th (ft) 34 31 23 27
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1661 1473 1522 1521
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.09
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 95 130 83 94
v/c Ratio 0.08 0.11 0.14 0.16
Control Delay 4.0 4.3 5.0 5.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.0 4.3 5.0 5.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 1 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 16 22 15 18
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1705 1646 1638 1654
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.08 0.05 0.06
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 111 155 44 111
v/c Ratio 0.12 0.20 0.05 0.14
Control Delay 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 25 10 21
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1708 1713 1764 1805
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.09 0.02 0.06
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 173 148 136
v/c Ratio 0.16 0.17 0.26 0.25
Control Delay 5.8 5.0 6.7 7.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 5.8 5.0 6.7 7.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 10 10 10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 29 26 27 26
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1687 1633 1530 1454
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.09
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 181 159 114 137
v/c Ratio 0.27 0.24 0.15 0.22
Control Delay 6.3 5.5 5.5 6.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.3 5.5 5.5 6.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 9 7 8
Queue Length 95th (ft) 34 27 23 27
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1627 1614 1549 1529
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.09
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 130 117 105
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.11 0.18 0.15
Control Delay 4.2 4.4 4.4 5.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.2 4.4 4.4 5.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 22 23 19 20
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1730 1629 1610 1784
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.06
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 172 221 44 135
v/c Ratio 0.24 0.35 0.07 0.22
Control Delay 5.4 6.7 5.8 7.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 5.4 6.7 5.8 7.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 15 2 10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 43 13 33
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1699 1493 1702 1577
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.15 0.03 0.09
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 175 176 173 143
v/c Ratio 0.17 0.18 0.29 0.25
Control Delay 6.1 5.1 6.7 7.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.1 5.1 6.7 7.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 10 12 11
Queue Length 95th (ft) 33 28 31 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1697 1632 1509 1455
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.10
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 215 189 132 146
v/c Ratio 0.30 0.28 0.21 0.23
Control Delay 6.4 6.1 6.0 6.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.4 6.1 6.0 6.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 12 8 10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 35 27 31
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1653 1515 1519 1516
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.12 0.09 0.10
Intersection Summary
100 Pringle Avenue | Suite 600
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
www.fehrandpeers.com
Memo
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.444.7301
Date: February 21, 2024
To: Christina Ratcliffe, Planning Director, City of Vallejo CC: Erwin Ordonez, Principal Planner, Interwest
From: Dimitri Antoniou, Pat Angell, Ascent
Subject: Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project in Vallejo, Class 32 Categorical Exemption
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
A Class 32 exemption is a Categorical Exemption under the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., title 14, Section 15000 et seq.) that is available for qualifying infill development located in an urban area. To qualify for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption, one criterion a project must meet is that approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project is located in the City of Vallejo on a 0.704-acre site, surrounded by commercial uses, and is characterized as an infill development project. The purpose of this Air Quality Study is to evaluate whether the proposed project could potentially result in any significant effects related to air quality for purposes of determining consistency with the requirements of a Class 32 Categorical Exemption under CEQA.
This study includes a brief explanation of the project, applicable standards of significance, analysis of air quality impacts, emission modeling results, and conclusions.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project site is located at 241-255 Georgia Street on Assessorβs Parcel Number (APN) 0055-170-390 in the City of Vallejo, California in southwest Solano County. The 0.704-acre project site is bounded by an existing commercial development to the west, Georgia Street to the north, Sacramento Street to the east, and an existing parking lot and Vallejo Transit Center to the south. The project site includes approximately 30,666 square feet (sf) of parcel area and is presently developed with a partial two-story building with a combined total square footage of 34,819 square feet.
The building is currently partially occupied by a medical clinic.
The proposed project would provide a new public charter high school that would accommodate a maximum of 400 students and 35 staff. The proposed project would be completed in two separate phases as the school continues to grow enrollment and additional funds for construction become available. The existing structure would not be demolished but internal improvements would be made to reconfigure the building layout.
The initial development phase proposes developing approximately 18,000 square feet of interior space suitable for 13 classrooms, four offices, bathroom facilities, a serving kitchen, a multi-purpose room, a library alcove, and a future gymnasium on the ground floor. The second development phase proposes to develop five additional classrooms, Final Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project
February 21, 2024
storage areas, restrooms, a conference room, and four private offices on the second floor. The proposed project improvements would be Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible and would comply with State design and construction standards. Other project improvements include adding school signage, developing perimeter fencing for security purposes, constructing curbs, ramps, and gutters; trenching along Georgia Street for underground utilities; removing/reconfiguring existing curbs to accommodate new parking; minor removal of shrubs and trees; adding a new ADA accessible ramp that would connect Sacramento Street to the rear entrance of the building; reconfiguring 16 parking spaces into eight parallel parking spaces along Sacramento Street, as well as adding 36 bicycle parking spaces. New perimeter fencing for security purposes, school signage, and 36 bicycle parking spaces would be included.
The school would operate Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. with occasional after-school activities and weekend events (e.g., parent engagement meetings). During the initial development phase, the school would house a maximum of 249 students, ten teaching staff, and 25 administrative staff. At full enrollment, there would be a maximum of 400 students and approximately 35 staff members.
The project site is located in the City of Vallejo in Solano County which is within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB). Air quality within the City of Vallejo is regulated by the US Environmental Protect Agency (EPA), California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). The SFBAAB is currently designated as a nonattainment area for State and national ozone standards and State particulate matter ambient air quality standards. The project site is surrounded by commercial land uses and the nearest sensitive receptors to the project site include the Vallejo John F. Kennedy Library, located approximately 0.08 miles northwest of the project site, north of Georgia Street and the multi-family residential dwellings along Maine Street, approximately 0.10 miles south of the project site.
APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
BAAQMD develops regulations and emissions reduction programs to control emissions of criteria air pollutants, ozone precursors (oxides of nitrogen [NOx] and reactive organic gases [ROG]), carbon monoxide (CO), toxic air contaminants (TACs), and odors within its jurisdiction. BAAQMDβs 2022 CEQA Guidelines (BAAQMD 2022), provides guidance for the preparation of CEQA documents as it pertains to air quality and climate change, including recommended thresholds of significance for evaluation of air quality impacts of projects in the SFBAAB. BAAQMDβs air quality thresholds of significance are tied to achieving or maintaining attainment designations, with the national and state air quality standards. The BAAQMDβs project level thresholds, which are scientifically substantiated, are numerical concentrations of criteria air pollutants considered to be protective of human health. Projects that do not exceed BAAQMD thresholds would not contribute to the nonattainment of state and subsequently national standards or result in increases in health-related impacts to sensitive receptors associated with increases in criteria air pollutants or ozone precursors. Applicable thresholds for project construction and operation are shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1 BAAQMD Thresholds of Significance for Construction and Operational-Related Criteria Air Pollutants and Precursors
Pollutant/Precursor
Operation
Construction
Average Daily Emission (lbs/day) Average Daily Emission (lbs/day) Maximum Annual Emissions (tons/year)
ROG 54 10 54
NOx 54 10 54
PM10 (exhaust) 82 15 82
PM2.5 (exhaust) 54 10 54
Final Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project
February 21, 2024
PM10/PM2.5 (fugitive dust) None BMPs
Notes:
lbs/day = pounds per day
NOx = oxides of nitrogen
PM2.5 = fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 2.5 micrometers PM10 = fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 10 micrometers ROG = reactive organic gases
BMP = Best Management Practices
Source: BAAQMD 2022
City if Vallejo General Plan
The policies and actions of the City of Vallejo 2040 General Plan Update which relate to air quality and are relevant to the project include (City of Vallejo 2017):
ο Policy CP-1.12 Clean Air. Protect the community from harmful levels of air pollution. ο‘ Action CP-1.12B. Update City regulations to set BAAQMD-recommended limits for particulate emissions from construction, demolition, debris hauling, and utility maintenance. ο‘ Action CP-1.12C. Provide information regarding advances in air-quality protection measures to schools, homeowners, and operators of βsensitive receptorsβ such as senior and childcare facilities. ο‘ Action CP-1.12E. Periodically review the Building Code for consistency with the latest California Green Building Standards Code and assess the need for updates to require new construction and remodels to employ best practices and materials to reduce emissions, both during and after construction.
Basic Dust Control Measures
The project must comply with applicable city, regional, State, and federal regulations. General Plan Policy CP-1.12 notes that the city follows BAAQMDβs recommendations for particulate emissions from construction, demolition, debris hauling, and utility maintenance (City of Vallejo 2017). To comply with the best management practices (BMPs) required for all projects located within the BAAQMD, the following dust suppression BMPs would be implemented during project construction.
ο All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day.
ο All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. ο All visible mud or dirt trackout onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. ο All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. ο All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. ο All excavation, grading, and/or demolition activities shall be suspended when average wind speeds exceed 20 mph.
ο All trucks and equipment, including their tires, shall be washed off prior to leaving the site. ο Unpaved roads providing access to sites located 100 feet or further from a paved road shall be treated with a 6- to 12-inch layer of compacted layer of wood chips, mulch, or gravel. ο Publicly visible signs shall be posted with the telephone number and name of the person to contact at the lead agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air Final Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project
February 21, 2024
Districtβs General Air Pollution Complaints number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.
ANALYSIS
Construction and Operational Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Project construction and operation would result in emissions of ROG, NOX, respirable particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometers (PM10), and fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5). Construction generated emissions would be temporary (i.e., Phase 1 construction is expected to start in March 2024 and end in November 2024) and would result from demolition activities, off-road equipment, material delivery, worker commute trips, and other activities (e.g., building construction, asphalt paving, application of architectural coatings). The air quality modeling assumed that phase two would be similar in duration and construction intensity as phase one and conservatively assumed that phase two would begin construction immediately after phase one is complete. This approach is conservative because construction equipment fleets become cleaner over time as older equipment is replaced with newer equipment.
Operational criteria air pollutant emissions would result from mobile and area-wide sources of emissions from vehicle trips, electricity consumption for lighting and building use, the use of landscaping equipment or other small equipment, and the periodic application of architectural coating. The projectβs mobile emissions were modeled using project specific trip rates identified in the traffic analysis conducted for this project (Fehr and Peers 2023). It should be noted that the air quality modeling assumed that the proposed development would result in new vehicular trips to the project site. However, currently, approximately 34,819 square feet of the existing two-story building is partially occupied by a medical clinic and once the project is complete, the total anticipated occupied space would be approximately 34,819 sf. Because the air emissions modeling did not adjust trips down for this anticipated decrease in medical clinic-associated trips from existing conditions, emissions estimates are conservative.
Construction and operation-generated emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2022.1.1.21 (CAPCOA 2022). Modeling was based on project-specific information (i.e., construction schedule and trip generation rates) and reasonable assumptions based on typical construction activities.
Where project-specific details were unavailable, default values in CalEEMod were used based on the projectβs location and land use type. For detailed assumptions and modeling inputs, refer to Attachment A: Air Quality.
Table 2 below summarizes the daily average construction and operational-related emissions of criteria air pollutants in pounds per day, compared to BAAQMD-recommended thresholds of significance for the respective air pollutant emissions. As shown in Table 2, project construction and operation emissions would result in levels of ROG, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5. emissions that are below the respective BAAQMD-recommended thresholds of significance, indicating that project construction and operation would not result cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria air pollutant emissions.
Table 2 Estimated Criteria Air Pollutants and Precursors Emissions Associated with Project Construction and Operation
Emissions Source
Project Generated Emissions
ROG NOX PM10 a PM2.5 a
Phase 1 Project Construction (2024) Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.75 2.95 0.14 0.10 Phase 2 Project Construction (2025) Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.71 2.84 0.14 0.10 BAAQMD Construction Threshold of Significance 54 54 82 54 Exceed Significance Threshold? No No No No
Project Operation b Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day) / Annual (tons/year) 3.52 / 0.64 2.89 / 0.53 3.99 / 0.73 1.06 / 0.19 Final Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project
February 21, 2024
BAAQMD Operation Threshold of Significance Average Daily Emissions/Annual 54 / 10 54 / 10 82 / 15 54 / 10 Exceed Significance Threshold? No No No No
Notes:
lbs/day = pounds per day
NOx = oxides of nitrogen
PM2.5 = fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 2.5 micrometers PM10 = fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 10 micrometers ROG = reactive organic gases
a Construction PM emissions and thresholds are only reflective of PM exhaust emissions. b Operation emissions include mobile, energy, and area source criteria air pollutant emissions.
Source: modeled by Ascent 2023
As shown above in Table 2, project-generated construction and operational emissions would not exceed BAAQMDβs adopted daily or annual thresholds. Therefore, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria air pollutant for which the region is in nonattainment.
Potential to Result in Substantial Carbon Monoxide Concentrations CO emissions from traffic generated by the project would be the pollutant of greatest concern at the local level.
Congested intersections with a large volume of traffic have the greatest potential to cause high localized concentrations of carbon monoxide. BAAQMD recommends comparing a projectβs attributes with the following screening criteria as a first step to evaluating whether the project would result in the generation of carbon monoxide concentrations that would substantially contribute to an exceedance of the Thresholds of Significance.
The project would result in a less than significant impact to localized carbon monoxide concentrations if:
1. The project is consistent with an applicable congestion management program for designated roads or highways, regional transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans.
2. The project would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 44,000 vehicles per hour
3. The project traffic would not increase traffic volumes at the affected intersections to more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited (e.g., tunnel, parking garage).
Based on the projectβs trip generation traffic data, there would be 276 peak trips per hour (Fehr and Peers 2023).
The projectβs 276 peak trips would be well below the 44,000 vehicle per hour BAAQMD screening levels. Therefore, the project would not result in localized concentrations that could exceed the applicable thresholds or expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of CO.
Potential to Result in Substantial Toxic Air Contaminant Concentrations Project construction would result in diesel TAC emissions from off-road construction equipment; however, these emissions would be temporary and cease once construction is complete. As shown in Table 2, PM exhaust emissions are minimal and would not result in substantial concentrations of TAC. The use of diesel-powered equipment would also be limited as primary construction activities involve minor improvements to the inside of the building and some minor upgrades to the exterior (e.g., landscape improvement, parking improvements, paving improvements). Further, the duration of construction activities would be short-term (i.e., less than one year for each phase), thus, exposure duration from construction related TACs would not be substantial. The project would not include construction of any stationary permitted TAC sources. Increases in vehicular trips generated by the project would be minimal and would not result in substantial increases of traffic volumes on nearby roads, thus, would not result in substantial increases in TAC concentrations.
Final Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project
February 21, 2024
Potential to Result in Substantial Odor Emissions
Construction of the project would result in minor odors from the use of off-road equipment and the application of architectural coatings. These odors would be intermittent and temporary, as they would only occur during the construction phase. The BAAQMD identifies land uses typically associated with potential odor impacts, including coffee roasters, industrial uses, waste and compost facilities, wastewater treatment plants, among others. The project would include a new public charter school with associated on-site amenities, none of which would include long-term odor sources. Therefore, the project would not introduce new odor sources to the project area, and the use of off- road equipment and the application of architectural coatings during construction would be intermittent and short- term and would not result in substantial odors; thus, the project would not result in substantial odor impacts to both existing and future sensitive receptors.
CONCLUSION
Project generated construction and operational criteria air pollutant and precursor emissions would not exceed BAAQMD recommended thresholds of significance for project related construction or operational emissions and thus would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. The project would generate minimal additional vehicle trips, would not result in substantial mobile or stationary sources of TACs, and would not result in sources of odors. Thus, approval of the project would not result in a significant effect related to air quality.
Final Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project
February 21, 2024
REFERENCES
Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2022. CEQA Guidelines. Available: https://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and- climate/california-environmental-quality-act-ceqa/updated-ceqa-guidelines. Accessed December 18, 2023.
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. 2022. California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2022.1.1.21.
Available: https://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed December 19, 2023.
City of Vallejo. 2017. Propel Vallejo General Plan 2040. Available:
https://www.cityofvallejo.net/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=17961496. Accessed December 18, 2023.
Fehr and Peers. 2023. Trip Generation and Turning Movements.
Appendix A
Air Quality
sheet 2 sheet 3
PCC Pavement Area (sq ft) 2500 2300 66 101 241 257
AC Pavement Area (sq ft) 4000 2700 1109 928 399 363
Total pavement
area to be
demolished Sq ft 6500 5000 1175 1029 640 620 14964 sq ft Assumptions
Height of wall 12 ft
Weight of wall 2.2 lbs per sq ft
Weight of 1 ton 0.0005 lbs per ton
Phase 1
Wall Length of wall (ft) sqft of wall lbs tons
1 45 540 1188 0.594
2 45 540 1188 0.594
3 10 120 264 0.132
4 10 120 264 0.132
5 10 120 264 0.132
6 20 240 528 0.264
7 20 240 528 0.264
8 13 156 343.2 0.1716
9 7 84 184.8 0.0924
10 10 120 264 0.132
11 10 120 264 0.132
12 10 120 264 0.132
13 10 120 264 0.132
14 25 300 660 0.33
15 33 396 871.2 0.4356
16 14 168 369.6 0.1848
17 14 168 369.6 0.1848
18 14 168 369.6 0.1848
19 22 264 580.8 0.2904
20 25 300 660 0.33
21 22 264 580.8 0.2904
22 22 264 580.8 0.2904
23 12 144 316.8 0.1584
24 9 108 237.6 0.1188
25 9 108 237.6 0.1188
26 6 72 158.4 0.0792
27 14 168 369.6 0.1848
28 10 120 264 0.132
29 8 96 211.2 0.1056
30 8 96 211.2 0.1056
31 16 192 422.4 0.2112
32 8 96 211.2 0.1056
33 12 144 316.8 0.1584
34 12 144 316.8 0.1584
35 8 96 211.2 0.1056
36 8 96 211.2 0.1056
37 21 252 554.4 0.2772
38 9 108 237.6 0.1188
39 13 156 343.2 0.1716
40 8 96 211.2 0.1056
41 8 96 211.2 0.1056
42 13 156 343.2 0.1716
43 8 96 211.2 0.1056
44 11 132 290.4 0.1452
45 11 132 290.4 0.1452
46 11 132 290.4 0.1452
47 8 96 211.2 0.1056
48 16 192 422.4 0.2112
49 13 156 343.2 0.1716
50 9 108 237.6 0.1188
51 7 84 184.8 0.0924
52 9 108 237.6 0.1188
53 6 72 158.4 0.0792
54 8 96 211.2 0.1056
55 25 300 660 0.33
56 28 336 739.2 0.3696
57 28 336 739.2 0.3696
58 22 264 580.8 0.2904
59 28 336 739.2 0.3696
sheet 5
Demolition Quantities Estimate
Using the site plans, all components to be removed (e.g., pavement, walls) were estimated and converted to tons of debris for purpose of estimating necessary haul trucks to evaluate emissions 60 28 336 739.2 0.3696
61 28 336 739.2 0.3696
62 11 132 290.4 0.1452
63 11 132 290.4 0.1452
64 11 132 290.4 0.1452
65 15 180 396 0.198
66 15 180 396 0.198
67 13 156 343.2 0.1716
68 13 156 343.2 0.1716
69 13 156 343.2 0.1716
70 5 60 132 0.066
71 5 60 132 0.066
72 5 60 132 0.066
73 5 60 132 0.066
74 5 60 132 0.066
75 15 180 396 0.198
76 12 144 316.8 0.1584
77 14 168 369.6 0.1848
78 14 168 369.6 0.1848
79 8 96 211.2 0.1056
80 15 180 396 0.198
81 6 72 158.4 0.0792
82 10 120 264 0.132
83 15 180 396 0.198
84 10 120 264 0.132
85 15 180 396 0.198
86 42 504 1108.8 0.5544
87 108 1296 2851.2 1.4256
88 15 180 396 0.198
89 24 288 633.6 0.3168
90 15 180 396 0.198
91 24 288 633.6 0.3168
92 15 180 396 0.198
93 5 60 132 0.066
94 15 180 396 0.198
95 15 180 396 0.198
96 15 180 396 0.198
97 16 192 422.4 0.2112
98 14 168 369.6 0.1848
99 14 168 369.6 0.1848
100 14 168 369.6 0.1848
101 14 168 369.6 0.1848
102 12 144 316.8 0.1584
103 12 144 316.8 0.1584
104 12 144 316.8 0.1584
105 12 144 316.8 0.1584
106 14 168 369.6 0.1848
107 8 96 211.2 0.1056
108 10 120 264 0.132
109 10 120 264 0.132
110 10 120 264 0.132
111 10 120 264 0.132
112 6 72 158.4 0.0792
113 6 72 158.4 0.0792
114 6 72 158.4 0.0792
115 28 336 739.2 0.3696
116 28 336 739.2 0.3696
117 20 240 528 0.264
118 32 384 844.8 0.4224
119 38 456 1003.2 0.5016
120 22 264 580.8 0.2904
121 8 96 211.2 0.1056
122 29 348 765.6 0.3828
123 47 564 1240.8 0.6204
124 32 384 844.8 0.4224
125 14 168 369.6 0.1848
126 12 144 316.8 0.1584
127 24 288 633.6 0.3168
128 10 120 264 0.132
129 10 120 264 0.132
130 10 120 264 0.132
131 10 120 264 0.132
132 13 156 343.2 0.1716
133 10 120 264 0.132
134 13 156 343.2 0.1716
135 22 264 580.8 0.2904
136 16 192 422.4 0.2112
137 6 72 158.4 0.0792
138 6 72 158.4 0.0792
139 14 168 369.6 0.1848
140 18 216 475.2 0.2376
141 4 48 105.6 0.0528
142 4 48 105.6 0.0528
143 4 48 105.6 0.0528
144 4 48 105.6 0.0528
145 4 48 105.6 0.0528
146 4 48 105.6 0.0528
147 8 96 211.2 0.1056
148 4 48 105.6 0.0528
149 4 48 105.6 0.0528
150 5 60 132 0.066
151 12 144 316.8 0.1584
152 14 168 369.6 0.1848
153 5 60 132 0.066
154 5 60 132 0.066
2254 ft 27048 sq ft 59505.6 lbs 29.7528 tons
Phase 2
Wall Length of wall (ft) sqft of wall lbs tons
1 31 372 818.4 0.4092
2 18 216 475.2 0.2376
3 18 216 475.2 0.2376
4 27 324 712.8 0.3564
5 9 108 237.6 0.1188
6 14 168 369.6 0.1848
7 20 240 528 0.264
8 20 240 528 0.264
9 17 204 448.8 0.2244
10 24 288 633.6 0.3168
11 17 204 448.8 0.2244
12 34 408 897.6 0.4488
13 17 204 448.8 0.2244
14 25 300 660 0.33
15 22 264 580.8 0.2904
16 15 180 396 0.198
17 20 240 528 0.264
18 24 288 633.6 0.3168
19 10 120 264 0.132
20 10 120 264 0.132
21 25 300 660 0.33
22 36 432 950.4 0.4752
23 16 192 422.4 0.2112
24 16 192 422.4 0.2112
25 26 312 686.4 0.3432
26 8 96 211.2 0.1056
27 20 240 528 0.264
28 10 120 264 0.132
29 11 132 290.4 0.1452
30 19 228 501.6 0.2508
31 19 228 501.6 0.2508
32 15 180 396 0.198
33 18 216 475.2 0.2376
34 14 168 369.6 0.1848
35 12 144 316.8 0.1584
36 11 132 290.4 0.1452
37 8 96 211.2 0.1056
676 ft 8112 sq ft 17846.4 lbs 8.9232 tons
MUP 4.1
Wall Length of wall (ft) sqft of wall lbs tons
1 22 264 580.8 0.2904
2 22 264 580.8 0.2904
3 22 264 580.8 0.2904
4 11 132 290.4 0.1452
77 ft 924 sq ft 2032.8 lbs 1.0164 tons
Demo Items: Quantity weight (tons) Quantity weight (tons) Demo Items: Quantity weight (tons) Quantity weight (tons) Quantity weight (tons) Quantity weight (tons) Walls 154 29.7528 4 1.0164 Walls 37 8.9232
HVAC HVAC 20 3.7
Fans Fans 3 0.18
Curbs 8 0.5625 Curbs 4 0.1875
Pavement Pavement 129.9 243.75 187.5
Doors 73 3.65 5 0.25 Doors 34 1.7
Hand Sink 10 0.15 Hand Sink 10 0.15
Kitchen Sink 6 0.09 Kitchen Sink 3 0.045
Wall Hung Urinal 2 0.06 Wall Hung Urinal 1 0.03
Water Closet 14 0.84 Water Closet 12 0.72
Total 34.5428 1.8289 Total 15.4482 130.0875 187.5
Misc:
sidewalk 2
tree 2 2
shrub 1 4
retaining wall 2
Total Phase 1
Demo 36.3717 tons fence 1
pipe 1
Total Phase 2
Demo 333.0357 tons handrail 1
Assumptions:
Weight of Door 100 lbs
Weight of Hand sink 30 lbs
Weight of Kitchen Sink 30 lbs
Weight of Urinal 60 lbs
Weight of Water Closet 120 lbs
Weight of 1 ton 0.0005 lbs
Curbs/pavement made of concrete
Weight of 1 CF of Concrete 150 lbs
Height/width of curb 0.5 ft
Height of pavement 0.5 ft
Weight of HVAC 370 lbs
Weight of Fan 120 lbs
misc. demolition - 2 additional truck trips
Curbs quantity length (ft) width (ft) height (ft) cubic feet (CF) lbs tons 4 20 0.5 0.5 5 750 0.375
4 10 0.5 0.5 2.5 375 0.1875
total tons of curb removed 0.5625
Pavement
sheet 2 sheet 3
PCC Pavement Area (sq ft) 2500 2300 66 101 241 257
AC Pavement Area (sq ft) 4000 2700 1109 928 399 363
Total pavement area to be
demolished 6500 5000 1175 1029 640 620 14964 sq ft
cubic feet of pavement 3250 2500 7482 cubic ft
total tons of pavement 243.75 187.5 561.15 tons
Phase 1
Phase 2 (MUP 8) Sheet 5 Sheet 2
Phase 2
sheet 5
1732
129.9
Sheet 3Phase 1Phase 1 (MUP 5) Prelim Demo (MUP 4.1)
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 1 / 28
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
Operations (Phase 1 + 2, full project)
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 2 / 28
4.3.1. Unmitigated
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.1. Unmitigated
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.1. Unmitigated
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 3 / 28
5. Activity Data
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 4 / 28
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
5.16.2. Process Boilers
5.17. User Defined
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 5 / 28
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
8. User Changes to Default Data
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 6 / 28
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Operational Y ear 2025
Lead Agency β
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.60
Precipitation (days) 34.8
Location 255 Georgia St #241, Vallejo, CA 94590, USA
County Solano-San Francisco
City Vallejo
Air District Bay Area AQMD
Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area
TAZ 823
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.21
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq
ft)
Population Description
High School 34.8 1000sqft 0.70 34,819 1,452 1,452 β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 7 / 28
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Unmit. 4.91 3.58 0.08 5.62 5.70 0.08 1.42 1.50 26.6 7,341 7,368 3.02 0.30 27.0 7,561 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Unmit. 4.44 4.12 0.08 5.62 5.70 0.08 1.42 1.50 26.6 6,939 6,966 3.06 0.33 0.83 7,143 Average
Daily (Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Unmit. 3.52 2.89 0.07 3.92 3.99 0.07 0.99 1.06 26.6 5,165 5,192 2.95 0.23 8.42 5,343 Annual
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Unmit. 0.64 0.53 0.01 0.72 0.73 0.01 0.18 0.19 4.41 855 860 0.49 0.04 1.39 885
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Mobile 3.80 3.17 0.05 5.62 5.67 0.05 1.42 1.47 β 6,759 6,759 0.29 0.30 26.9 6,881 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 8 / 28
Area 1.09 0.01 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 6.23 6.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 6.25 Energy 0.02 0.40 0.03 β 0.03 0.03 β 0.03 β 571 571 0.06 < 0.005 β 574 Water β β β β β β β β 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 β 13.8
Waste β β β β β β β β 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 β 85.3
Refrig. β β β β β β β β β β β β β 0.13 0.13
Total 4.91 3.58 0.08 5.62 5.70 0.08 1.42 1.50 26.6 7,341 7,368 3.02 0.30 27.0 7,561 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Mobile 3.58 3.72 0.05 5.62 5.67 0.05 1.42 1.47 β 6,363 6,363 0.34 0.33 0.70 6,470 Area 0.84 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Energy 0.02 0.40 0.03 β 0.03 0.03 β 0.03 β 571 571 0.06 < 0.005 β 574 Water β β β β β β β β 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 β 13.8
Waste β β β β β β β β 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 β 85.3
Refrig. β β β β β β β β β β β β β 0.13 0.13
Total 4.44 4.12 0.08 5.62 5.70 0.08 1.42 1.50 26.6 6,939 6,966 3.06 0.33 0.83 7,143 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Mobile 2.53 2.48 0.04 3.92 3.96 0.03 0.99 1.03 β 4,587 4,587 0.23 0.22 8.29 4,667 Area 0.97 0.01 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 3.07 3.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 3.08 Energy 0.02 0.40 0.03 β 0.03 0.03 β 0.03 β 571 571 0.06 < 0.005 β 574 Water β β β β β β β β 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 β 13.8
Waste β β β β β β β β 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 β 85.3
Refrig. β β β β β β β β β β β β β 0.13 0.13
Total 3.52 2.89 0.07 3.92 3.99 0.07 0.99 1.06 26.6 5,165 5,192 2.95 0.23 8.42 5,343 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Mobile 0.46 0.45 0.01 0.72 0.72 0.01 0.18 0.19 β 759 759 0.04 0.04 1.37 773 Area 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 0.51 0.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.51 Energy < 0.005 0.07 0.01 β 0.01 0.01 β 0.01 β 94.6 94.6 0.01 < 0.005 β 95.0 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 9 / 28
Water β β β β β β β β 0.37 0.71 1.08 0.04 < 0.005 β 2.29 Waste β β β β β β β β 4.04 0.00 4.04 0.40 0.00 β 14.1
Refrig. β β β β β β β β β β β β β 0.02 0.02
Total 0.64 0.53 0.01 0.72 0.73 0.01 0.18 0.19 4.41 855 860 0.49 0.04 1.39 885
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
3.80 3.17 0.05 5.62 5.67 0.05 1.42 1.47 β 6,759 6,759 0.29 0.30 26.9 6,881 Total 3.80 3.17 0.05 5.62 5.67 0.05 1.42 1.47 β 6,759 6,759 0.29 0.30 26.9 6,881 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
3.58 3.72 0.05 5.62 5.67 0.05 1.42 1.47 β 6,363 6,363 0.34 0.33 0.70 6,470 Total 3.58 3.72 0.05 5.62 5.67 0.05 1.42 1.47 β 6,363 6,363 0.34 0.33 0.70 6,470 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
0.46 0.45 0.01 0.72 0.72 0.01 0.18 0.19 β 759 759 0.04 0.04 1.37 773 Total 0.46 0.45 0.01 0.72 0.72 0.01 0.18 0.19 β 759 759 0.04 0.04 1.37 773
4.2. Energy
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 10 / 28
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
β β β β β β β β β 89.2 89.2 0.01 < 0.005 β 90.1
Total β β β β β β β β β 89.2 89.2 0.01 < 0.005 β 90.1
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
β β β β β β β β β 89.2 89.2 0.01 < 0.005 β 90.1
Total β β β β β β β β β 89.2 89.2 0.01 < 0.005 β 90.1
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
β β β β β β β β β 14.8 14.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 14.9
Total β β β β β β β β β 14.8 14.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 14.9
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
0.02 0.40 0.03 β 0.03 0.03 β 0.03 β 482 482 0.04 < 0.005 β 483 Total 0.02 0.40 0.03 β 0.03 0.03 β 0.03 β 482 482 0.04 < 0.005 β 483 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 11 / 28
βββββββββββββββDaily,
Winter
(Max)
High
School
0.02 0.40 0.03 β 0.03 0.03 β 0.03 β 482 482 0.04 < 0.005 β 483 Total 0.02 0.40 0.03 β 0.03 0.03 β 0.03 β 482 482 0.04 < 0.005 β 483 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
< 0.005 0.07 0.01 β 0.01 0.01 β 0.01 β 79.8 79.8 0.01 < 0.005 β 80.0 Total < 0.005 0.07 0.01 β 0.01 0.01 β 0.01 β 79.8 79.8 0.01 < 0.005 β 80.0
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Consumer
Products
0.75 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Architectur
al
Coatings
0.10 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Landscape
Equipment
0.25 0.01 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 6.23 6.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 6.25 Total 1.09 0.01 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 6.23 6.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 6.25 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Consumer
Products
0.75 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 12 / 28
Architectur
Coatings
0.10 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total 0.84 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Consumer
Products
0.14 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Architectur
al
Coatings
0.02 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Landscape
Equipment
0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 0.51 0.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.51 Total 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 0.51 0.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.51
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
β β β β β β β β 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 β 13.8
Total β β β β β β β β 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 β 13.8
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
β β β β β β β β 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 β 13.8
Total β β β β β β β β 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 β 13.8
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 13 / 28
2.29β< 0.0050.041.080.710.37ββββββββHigh
School
Total β β β β β β β β 0.37 0.71 1.08 0.04 < 0.005 β 2.29
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
β β β β β β β β 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 β 85.3
Total β β β β β β β β 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 β 85.3
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
β β β β β β β β 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 β 85.3
Total β β β β β β β β 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 β 85.3
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
β β β β β β β β 4.04 0.00 4.04 0.40 0.00 β 14.1
Total β β β β β β β β 4.04 0.00 4.04 0.40 0.00 β 14.1
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 14 / 28
Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
β β β β β β β β β β β β β 0.13 0.13
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β 0.13 0.13
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
β β β β β β β β β β β β β 0.13 0.13
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β 0.13 0.13
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
High
School
β β β β β β β β β β β β β 0.02 0.02
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β 0.02 0.02
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment
Type
ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 15 / 28
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment
Type
ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment
Type
ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 16 / 28
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 17 / 28
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Avoided β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Sequester
ed
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Removed β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Avoided β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Sequester
ed
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Removed β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 18 / 28
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Avoided β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Sequester
ed
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Removed β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
5. Activity Data
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Y ear VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Y ear High School 838 0.00 0.00 218,412 7,983 0.00 0.00 2,081,259
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 19 / 28
0 0.00 52,229 17,410 β
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) High School 159,582 204 0.0330 0.0040 1,504,466
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) High School 1,156,152 39,456
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
High School 45.3 β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 20 / 28
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced High School Household refrigerators
and/or freez
ers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
High School Other commercial A/C
and heat
pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
High School Stand-alone retail
refriger
ators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 < 0.005 1.00 0.00 1.00
High School Walk-in refrigerators
and freez
ers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Y ear Horsepower Load Factor
5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)
5.17. User Defined
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 21 / 28
Equipment Type Fuel Type
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040β2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will
continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.
Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 13.9 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 5.10 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise β meters of inundation depth
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 22 / 28
Wildfire 10.1 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical
data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040β2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ΒΎ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day
or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation
location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events.
Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040β2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation,
population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 2 0 0 N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 23 / 28
Extreme Precipitation 2 1 1 3
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators β
AQ-Ozone 13.6
AQ-PM 39.2
AQ-DPM 75.4
Drinking Water 24.0
Lead Risk Housing 78.3
Pesticides 32.3
Toxic Releases 63.4
Traffic 10.0
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 24 / 28
Effect Indicators β
CleanUp Sites 64.4
Groundwater 93.0
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 81.0
Impaired Water Bodies 51.2
Solid Waste 43.9
Sensitive Population β
Asthma 99.8
Cardio-vascular 91.6
Low Birth Weights 99.2
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators β
Education 72.5
Housing 95.2
Linguistic 49.1
Poverty 97.4
Unemployment 99.1
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic β
Above Poverty 1.090722443
Employed 2.284101116
Median HI 0.128320287
Education β
Bachelor's or higher 26.30565892
High school enrollment 100
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 25 / 28
Preschool enrollment 16.65597331
Transportation β
Auto Access 0.397792891
Active commuting 89.25959194
Social β
2-parent households 0.641601437
Voting 31.59245477
Neighborhood β
Alcohol availability 23.58526883
Park access 81.35506224
Retail density 74.04080585
Supermarket access 16.64314128
Tree canopy 51.99538047
Housing β
Homeownership 3.849608623
Housing habitability 6.377518286
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 3.336327473 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 17.56704735
Uncrowded housing 51.79006801
Health Outcomes β
Insured adults 49.23649429
Arthritis 1.4
Asthma ER Admissions 0.2
High Blood Pressure 1.5
Cancer (excluding skin) 22.7
Asthma 3.8
Coronary Heart Disease 1.7
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 26 / 28
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 1.1
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 30.6
Cognitively Disabled 3.1
Physically Disabled 47.8
Heart Attack ER Admissions 2.0
Mental Health Not Good 14.3
Chronic Kidney Disease 2.1
Obesity 8.0
Pedestrian Injuries 88.6
Physical Health Not Good 5.8
Stroke 0.9
Health Risk Behaviors β
Binge Drinking 98.2
Current Smoker 11.7
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 6.8
Climate Change Exposures β
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 44.7
Children 4.0
Elderly 20.2
English Speaking 38.4
Foreign-born 38.0
Outdoor Workers 8.0
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity β
Impervious Surface Cover 9.4
Traffic Density 6.4
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 27 / 28
Traffic Access 87.4
Other Indices β
Hardship 95.4
Other Decision Support β
2016 Voting 11.1
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 94.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 0.00 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Y es Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Y es Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use lot size and acreage provided by project description.
Construction: Construction Phases The existing structure would not be demolished.
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 28 / 28
Operations: Vehicle Data Total daily trip = 868. No weekend trip rates since it is a school.
Characteristics: Project Details Project location is downtown Vallejo.
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 1 / 28
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
3.5. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
3.7. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
3.9. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
Phase 1 Construction Only Output
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 2 / 28
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
5.5. Architectural Coatings
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
5.7. Construction Paving
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 3 / 28
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 4 / 28
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
8. User Changes to Default Data
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 5 / 28
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Construction Start Date 3/14/2024
Lead Agency β
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.60
Precipitation (days) 34.8
Location 255 Georgia St #241, Vallejo, CA 94590, USA
County Solano-San Francisco
City Vallejo
Air District Bay Area AQMD
Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area
TAZ 823
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.21
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq
ft)
Population Description
High School 18.0 1000sqft 0.70 18,000 1,452 1,452 β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 6 / 28
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Unmit. 0.87 6.95 0.33 0.11 0.40 0.30 0.02 0.31 β 1,529 1,529 0.06 0.03 0.51 1,539 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Unmit. 31.0 6.72 0.29 0.11 0.40 0.27 0.02 0.29 β 1,524 1,524 0.06 0.03 0.01 1,533 Average
Daily (Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Unmit. 0.75 2.95 0.10 0.04 0.14 0.10 0.01 0.10 β 585 585 0.02 0.01 0.09 588 Annual
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Unmit. 0.14 0.54 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 β 96.9 96.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 97.4
2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
2024 0.87 6.95 0.33 0.11 0.40 0.30 0.02 0.31 β 1,529 1,529 0.06 0.03 0.51 1,539 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 7 / 28
Daily -
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
2024 31.0 6.72 0.29 0.11 0.40 0.27 0.02 0.29 β 1,524 1,524 0.06 0.03 0.01 1,533 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
2024 0.75 2.95 0.10 0.04 0.14 0.10 0.01 0.10 β 585 585 0.02 0.01 0.09 588 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
2024 0.14 0.54 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 β 96.9 96.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 97.4
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.73 5.83 0.29 β 0.29 0.27 β 0.27 β 864 864 0.04 0.01 β 867 Demolition β β β 0.02 0.02 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β β β β β β β Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.73 5.83 0.29 β 0.29 0.27 β 0.27 β 864 864 0.04 0.01 β 867 Demolition β β β 0.02 0.02 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β β β β β β β Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 8 / 28
0.000.000.000.000.000.00β0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.06 0.48 0.02 β 0.02 0.02 β 0.02 β 71.0 71.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 71.3 Demolition β β β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β β β β β β β Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.01 0.09 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 11.8 11.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 11.8 Demolition β β β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β β β β β β β Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 β 91.3 91.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 92.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 23.9 23.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 25.1 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 β 84.4 84.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 85.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 23.9 23.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 25.1 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 7.02 7.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.12 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 9 / 28
Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 1.96 1.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.06 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 1.16 1.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.18 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.33 0.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.34
3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.85 6.94 0.33 β 0.33 0.30 β 0.30 β 903 903 0.04 0.01 β 906 Dust From
Material
Mo
vement
β β β 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.07 0.57 0.03 β 0.03 0.02 β 0.02 β 74.2 74.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 74.5 Dust From
Material
Mo
vement
β β β 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 10 / 28
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.01 0.10 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 12.3 12.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 12.3 Dust From
Material
Mo
vement
β β β 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 β 45.6 45.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 46.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 3.51 3.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.56 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.58 0.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.59 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.5. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 11 / 28
Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.65 6.58 0.19 β 0.19 0.17 β 0.17 β 1,380 1,380 0.06 0.01 β 1,385 Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.65 6.58 0.19 β 0.19 0.17 β 0.17 β 1,380 1,380 0.06 0.01 β 1,385 Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.18 1.80 0.05 β 0.05 0.05 β 0.05 β 378 378 0.02 < 0.005 β 379 Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.03 0.33 0.01 β 0.01 0.01 β 0.01 β 62.6 62.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 62.8 Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 β 69.0 69.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 70.1 Vendor < 0.005 0.11 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 β 80.1 80.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.21 83.9 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 12 / 28
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 β 63.8 63.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 64.6 Vendor < 0.005 0.11 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 β 80.1 80.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 83.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 17.7 17.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 17.9 Vendor < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 21.9 21.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 23.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 2.93 2.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.97 Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 3.63 3.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.80 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.7. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.35 2.88 0.16 β 0.16 0.14 β 0.14 β 447 447 0.02 < 0.005 β 448 Paving 0.00 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 13 / 28
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 6.12 6.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 6.14 Paving 0.00 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 1.01 1.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 1.02 Paving 0.00 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 β 105 105 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 107 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 1.46 1.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.48 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.24 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.25 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 14 / 28
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.9. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.14 0.91 0.03 β 0.03 0.03 β 0.03 β 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 β 134 Architectur
al
Coatings
30.9 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 1.83 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 1.84 Architectur
al
Coatings
0.42 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.30 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 15 / 28
Architectur
Coatings
0.08 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 12.8 12.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 12.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 16 / 28
Vegetation ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 17 / 28
βββββββββββββββDaily,
Summer
(Max)
Avoided β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Sequester
ed
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Removed β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Avoided β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Sequester
ed
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Removed β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Avoided β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Sequester
ed
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Removed β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 18 / 28
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 3/14/2024 4/24/2024 5.00 30.0 Material removal Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/25/2024 6/5/2024 5.00 30.0 Landscaping Building Construction Building Construction 6/6/2024 10/23/2024 5.00 100 Minor improvements Paving Paving 10/24/2024 10/30/2024 5.00 5.00 Paving for ramp Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/31/2024 11/6/2024 5.00 5.00 Parking stripes
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Off-Highway Trucks Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 84.0 0.37 Demolition Dumpers/Tenders Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 367 0.40 Demolition Dumpers/Tenders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Site Preparation Dumpers/Tenders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Trenchers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Building Construction Off-Highway Trucks Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Pressure Washers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel A verage 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Off-Highway Trucks Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 19 / 28
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition β β β β
Demolition Worker 10.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor β 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 0.33 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck β β HHDT
Site Preparation β β β β
Site Preparation Worker 5.00 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor β 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck β β HHDT
Building Construction β β β β
Building Construction Worker 7.56 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 2.95 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck β β HHDT
Paving β β β β
Paving Worker 12.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor β 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck β β HHDT
Architectural Coating β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 20 / 28
Architectural Coating Worker 1.51 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor β 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck β β HHDT
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.
5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq
ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 27,000 0.00 6,300
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Ton of Debris)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.4 β
Site Preparation β β 0.00 0.00 β
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 2 61% 61%
Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 21 / 28
5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
High School 0.00 0%
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year) β 1.00 β β
β -4.00 β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 22 / 28
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040β2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will
continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.
Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 13.9 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 5.10 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise β meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 10.1 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical
data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040β2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ΒΎ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day
or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation
location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events.
Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040β2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation,
population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 2 0 0 N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 23 / 28
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 2 1 1 3
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 24 / 28
AQ-Ozone 13.6
AQ-PM 39.2
AQ-DPM 75.4
Drinking Water 24.0
Lead Risk Housing 78.3
Pesticides 32.3
Toxic Releases 63.4
Traffic 10.0
Effect Indicators β
CleanUp Sites 64.4
Groundwater 93.0
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 81.0
Impaired Water Bodies 51.2
Solid Waste 43.9
Sensitive Population β
Asthma 99.8
Cardio-vascular 91.6
Low Birth Weights 99.2
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators β
Education 72.5
Housing 95.2
Linguistic 49.1
Poverty 97.4
Unemployment 99.1
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 25 / 28
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic β
Above Poverty 1.090722443
Employed 2.284101116
Median HI 0.128320287
Education β
Bachelor's or higher 26.30565892
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 16.65597331
Transportation β
Auto Access 0.397792891
Active commuting 89.25959194
Social β
2-parent households 0.641601437
Voting 31.59245477
Neighborhood β
Alcohol availability 23.58526883
Park access 81.35506224
Retail density 74.04080585
Supermarket access 16.64314128
Tree canopy 51.99538047
Housing β
Homeownership 3.849608623
Housing habitability 6.377518286
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 3.336327473 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 17.56704735
Uncrowded housing 51.79006801
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 26 / 28
Health Outcomes β
Insured adults 49.23649429
Arthritis 1.4
Asthma ER Admissions 0.2
High Blood Pressure 1.5
Cancer (excluding skin) 22.7
Asthma 3.8
Coronary Heart Disease 1.7
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 1.1
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 30.6
Cognitively Disabled 3.1
Physically Disabled 47.8
Heart Attack ER Admissions 2.0
Mental Health Not Good 14.3
Chronic Kidney Disease 2.1
Obesity 8.0
Pedestrian Injuries 88.6
Physical Health Not Good 5.8
Stroke 0.9
Health Risk Behaviors β
Binge Drinking 98.2
Current Smoker 11.7
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 6.8
Climate Change Exposures β
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 44.7
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 27 / 28
Children 4.0
Elderly 20.2
English Speaking 38.4
Foreign-born 38.0
Outdoor Workers 8.0
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity β
Impervious Surface Cover 9.4
Traffic Density 6.4
Traffic Access 87.4
Other Indices β
Hardship 95.4
Other Decision Support β
2016 Voting 11.1
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 94.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 0.00 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Y es Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Y es Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 28 / 28
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use project specific acreage provided.
Construction: Construction Phases no grading.
Construction: Off-Road Equipment The project is modifying existing structure and not constructing new facilities therefore defaults were revised
based on scope of project construction.
Construction: Architectural Coatings No exterior painting. The school would be required to provide 35 parking spaces (based on zoning code/table16.508-A
for DMX district). Standard parking space = 180 sq.ft. (35 x 180 = 6,300 sq.ft.) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 1 / 28
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated
3.3. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
3.7. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
3.9. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
Phase 2 Construction Only
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 2 / 28
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
5.5. Architectural Coatings
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
5.7. Construction Paving
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 3 / 28
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 4 / 28
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
8. User Changes to Default Data
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 5 / 28
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Construction Start Date 3/14/2025
Lead Agency β
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.60
Precipitation (days) 34.8
Location 241 Georgia St, Vallejo, CA 94590, USA
County Solano-San Francisco
City Vallejo
Air District Bay Area AQMD
Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area
TAZ 823
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.21
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq
ft)
Population Description
High School 16.8 1000sqft 0.70 16,819 1,452 1,452 β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 6 / 28
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Unmit. 0.84 6.79 0.31 0.29 0.55 0.28 0.06 0.29 β 1,518 1,518 0.06 0.04 0.81 1,528 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Unmit. 29.4 6.41 0.25 0.29 0.55 0.23 0.06 0.29 β 1,514 1,514 0.06 0.04 0.02 1,522 Average
Daily (Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Unmit. 0.71 2.84 0.09 0.05 0.14 0.09 0.01 0.10 β 596 596 0.02 0.01 0.09 600 Annual
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Unmit. 0.13 0.52 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 β 98.7 98.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 99.3
2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
2025 0.84 6.79 0.31 0.29 0.55 0.28 0.06 0.29 β 1,518 1,518 0.06 0.04 0.81 1,528 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 7 / 28
Daily -
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
2025 29.4 6.41 0.25 0.29 0.55 0.23 0.06 0.29 β 1,514 1,514 0.06 0.04 0.02 1,522 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
2025 0.71 2.84 0.09 0.05 0.14 0.09 0.01 0.10 β 596 596 0.02 0.01 0.09 600 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
2025 0.13 0.52 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 β 98.7 98.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 99.3
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.68 5.48 0.25 β 0.25 0.23 β 0.23 β 865 865 0.04 0.01 β 868 Demolition β β β 0.16 0.16 β 0.02 0.02 β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.68 5.48 0.25 β 0.25 0.23 β 0.23 β 865 865 0.04 0.01 β 868 Demolition β β β 0.16 0.16 β 0.02 0.02 β β β β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 8 / 28
0.000.000.000.000.000.00β0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.06 0.45 0.02 β 0.02 0.02 β 0.02 β 71.1 71.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 71.3 Demolition β β β 0.01 0.01 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β β β β β β β Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.01 0.08 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 11.8 11.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 11.8 Demolition β β β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β β β β β β β Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 β 89.5 89.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.37 91.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.24 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 β 197 197 0.01 0.03 0.44 207 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 β 82.8 82.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 83.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.26 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 β 197 197 0.01 0.03 0.01 207 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 6.88 6.88 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.99 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 9 / 28
Hauling < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 16.2 16.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 17.0 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 1.14 1.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.16 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 2.68 2.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.82
3.3. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.82 6.77 0.31 β 0.31 0.28 β 0.28 β 904 904 0.04 0.01 β 907 Dust From
Material
Mo
vement
β β β 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.07 0.56 0.03 β 0.03 0.02 β 0.02 β 74.3 74.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 74.5 Dust From
Material
Mo
vement
β β β 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 10 / 28
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.01 0.10 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 12.3 12.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 12.3 Dust From
Material
Mo
vement
β β β 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 β 44.8 44.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 45.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 3.44 3.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.49 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.58 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 11 / 28
Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.61 6.29 0.16 β 0.16 0.15 β 0.15 β 1,381 1,381 0.06 0.01 β 1,386 Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.61 6.29 0.16 β 0.16 0.15 β 0.15 β 1,381 1,381 0.06 0.01 β 1,386 Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.17 1.72 0.04 β 0.04 0.04 β 0.04 β 378 378 0.02 < 0.005 β 380 Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.03 0.31 0.01 β 0.01 0.01 β 0.01 β 62.7 62.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 62.9 Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 β 63.2 63.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.26 64.3 Vendor < 0.005 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 β 73.7 73.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.20 77.1 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 12 / 28
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 β 58.5 58.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 59.2 Vendor < 0.005 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 β 73.7 73.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 77.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 16.2 16.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.5 Vendor < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 21.1 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 2.68 2.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.72 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 3.34 3.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.49 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.7. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.31 2.54 0.12 β 0.12 0.11 β 0.11 β 423 423 0.02 < 0.005 β 425 Paving 0.00 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 13 / 28
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 5.80 5.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 5.82 Paving 0.00 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 0.96 0.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.96 Paving 0.00 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 β 103 103 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 105 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 1.43 1.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.46 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.24 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.24 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 14 / 28
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.9. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
0.13 0.88 0.03 β 0.03 0.03 β 0.03 β 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 β 134 Architectur
al
Coatings
29.2 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 1.83 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 1.84 Architectur
al
Coatings
0.40 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 < 0.005 β < 0.005 β 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.30 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 15 / 28
Architectur
Coatings
0.07 β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Onsite
truc
k
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 11.7 11.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 11.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.16 0.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 β 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 β 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 16 / 28
Vegetation ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Total β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 17 / 28
βββββββββββββββDaily,
Summer
(Max)
Avoided β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Sequester
ed
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Removed β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Avoided β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Sequester
ed
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Removed β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Annual β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Avoided β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Sequester
ed
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Removed β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Subtotal β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 18 / 28
β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 3/14/2025 4/24/2025 5.00 30.0 β
Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/25/2025 6/5/2025 5.00 30.0 β Building Construction Building Construction 6/6/2025 10/23/2025 5.00 100 β Paving Paving 10/24/2025 10/30/2025 5.00 5.00 β
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/31/2025 11/6/2025 5.00 5.00 β
5.2. Off-Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Off-Highway Trucks Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 84.0 0.37 Demolition Dumpers/Tenders Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 367 0.40 Demolition Dumpers/Tenders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Site Preparation Dumpers/Tenders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Trenchers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Building Construction Off-Highway Trucks Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Pressure Washers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Paving Off-Highway Trucks Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel A verage 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 19 / 28
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition β β β β
Demolition Worker 10.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor β 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 2.80 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck β β HHDT
Site Preparation β β β β
Site Preparation Worker 5.00 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor β 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck β β HHDT
Building Construction β β β β
Building Construction Worker 7.06 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 2.76 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck β β HHDT
Paving β β β β
Paving Worker 12.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor β 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck β β HHDT
Architectural Coating β β β β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 20 / 28
Architectural Coating Worker 1.41 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor β 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck β β HHDT
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.
5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq
ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 25,229 0.00 6,300
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Ton of Debris)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 333 β
Site Preparation β β 0.00 0.00 β
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 2 61% 61%
Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 21 / 28
5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
High School 0.00 0%
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 22 / 28
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040β2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will
continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.
Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 13.9 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 5.10 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise β meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 10.1 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical
data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040β2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ΒΎ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day
or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation
location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events.
Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040β2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation,
population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 0 0 0 N/A
Sea Level Rise 0 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 0 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 23 / 28
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 1 1 1 2
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators β
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 24 / 28
AQ-Ozone 13.6
AQ-PM 39.2
AQ-DPM 75.4
Drinking Water 24.0
Lead Risk Housing 78.3
Pesticides 32.3
Toxic Releases 63.4
Traffic 10.0
Effect Indicators β
CleanUp Sites 64.4
Groundwater 93.0
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 81.0
Impaired Water Bodies 51.2
Solid Waste 43.9
Sensitive Population β
Asthma 99.8
Cardio-vascular 91.6
Low Birth Weights 99.2
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators β
Education 72.5
Housing 95.2
Linguistic 49.1
Poverty 97.4
Unemployment 99.1
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 25 / 28
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic β
Above Poverty 1.090722443
Employed 2.284101116
Median HI 0.128320287
Education β
Bachelor's or higher 26.30565892
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 16.65597331
Transportation β
Auto Access 0.397792891
Active commuting 89.25959194
Social β
2-parent households 0.641601437
Voting 31.59245477
Neighborhood β
Alcohol availability 23.58526883
Park access 81.35506224
Retail density 74.04080585
Supermarket access 16.64314128
Tree canopy 51.99538047
Housing β
Homeownership 3.849608623
Housing habitability 6.377518286
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 3.336327473 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 17.56704735
Uncrowded housing 51.79006801
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 26 / 28
Health Outcomes β
Insured adults 49.23649429
Arthritis 1.4
Asthma ER Admissions 0.2
High Blood Pressure 1.5
Cancer (excluding skin) 22.7
Asthma 3.8
Coronary Heart Disease 1.7
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 1.1
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 30.6
Cognitively Disabled 3.1
Physically Disabled 47.8
Heart Attack ER Admissions 2.0
Mental Health Not Good 14.3
Chronic Kidney Disease 2.1
Obesity 8.0
Pedestrian Injuries 88.6
Physical Health Not Good 5.8
Stroke 0.9
Health Risk Behaviors β
Binge Drinking 98.2
Current Smoker 11.7
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 6.8
Climate Change Exposures β
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 44.7
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 27 / 28
Children 4.0
Elderly 20.2
English Speaking 38.4
Foreign-born 38.0
Outdoor Workers 8.0
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity β
Impervious Surface Cover 9.4
Traffic Density 6.4
Traffic Access 87.4
Other Indices β
Hardship 95.4
Other Decision Support β
2016 Voting 11.1
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 94.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 0.00 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Y es Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Y es Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 28 / 28
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Characteristics: Project Details Phase 2 construction to start in 2025 Land Use project specific acreage provided.
Construction: Construction Phases no grading.
Construction: Off-Road Equipment The project is modifying existing structure and not constructing new facilities therefore defaults were revised
based on scope of project construction.
Construction: Architectural Coatings No exterior painting. The school would be required to provide 35 parking spaces (based on zoning code/table16.508-A
for DMX district). Standard parking space = 180 sq.ft. (35 x 180 = 6,300 sq.ft.) Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP1
220118 Author Checker
PROJECT DESCRIPTION :
THE PROPOSED PUBLIC CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL WILL PROVIDE
A VALUABLE HIGH SCHOOL IN THE DOWNTOWN VALLEJO AREA.
THE EXISTING BUILDING LOCATED AT 241-255 GEORGIA STREET WILL ACCOMMODATE A MAXIMUM OF 400 STUDENTS AND 35
STAFF. THE BUILDING IS A PARTIAL TWO-STORY BUILDING WITH A COMBINED TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 34,819 SQUARE
FEET.
THE TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WILL BE PHASED AS
FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE TO UPGRADE THE BUILDING. THE
FIRST PHASE PERMIT WILL INCLUDE THE FULL GROUND FLOOR
WITH TWO SUITES IDENTIFIED AS DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATES IF THE BIDS COME IN TOO HIGH. THE SECOND PHASE WILL INCLUDE
THE SECOND FLOOR AND ANY WORK THAT WAS NOT
COMPLETED ON THE FIRST FLOOR IN PHASE I.
THE PROGRAM FOR THE GROUND FLOOR INCLUDES 13
CLASSROOMS, A LIBRARY ALCOVE, MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM,
SERVING KITCHEN, 4 OFFICES, RESTROOMS, AND STORAGE
AREAS. THE SECOND FLOOR WILL ACCOMMODATE 5
ADDITIONAL CLASSROOMS, STORAGE, RESTROOMS, A
CONFERENCE ROOM AND 4 PRIVATE OFFICES.
THE MAIN VISITOR ENTRANCE WILL BE LOCATED ON GEORGIA
STREET AND THE STUDENT ENTRANCE WILL BE AT THE BACK OF
THE BUILDING AT LOT G. STUDENTS WILL ACCESS THE BUILDING
FROM AN ADA COMPLIANT RAMP OFF SACRAMENTO STREET
THAT WILL LEAD TO A GATED, FENCED WALKWAY. THE
SECOND FLOOR WILL HAVE ACCESS OFF THE WEST END OF
THE BUILDING WITH A NEW ELEVATOR AND COMPLIANT ENTRY
STAIRS.
PROJECT NUMBER:
APN: 0055-170-390
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: III-B
SEPARATION WALLS: AS APPLICABLE
OCCUPANCY GROUP: E OCCUPANCY
TABULATIONS:
TOTAL LOT AREA = 0.704 ACRE (PARCEL 1 @ 0.620 + PARCEL
2 @ 0.034 + PARCEL 3 @ 0.025 + PARCEL 4 @ 0.025)
GROSS BUILDING AREA: 34,819 S.F.
22,990 S.F. GROUND FLOOR
11,860 S.F. SECOND FLOOR.
PROJECT DATA:
ZONING: DMX (DOWNTOWN MIXED-USE)
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
REQUIRED EXISTING
FRONT SETBACK: 00 00
SIDE SETBACK: 00 00
REAR SETBACK: 00 00
BUILDING HEIGHT: 102 FT. 34 FT.
BICYCLE PARKING (VMC 16.508.12 & TABLE 16.508-D):
SCHOOLS - 2 SHORT-TERM SPACES PER CLASSROOM OR 6% OF
STUDENT CAPACITY PLUS STAFF.
18 CLASSROOMS * 2 = 36 BICYCLE SPACES
PROJECT TEAM
VICINITY MAP
SITE LOCATION
APPLICANT:
ELITE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
100 WHITNEY AVENUE
VALLEJO, CA 94589
(707) 652-3142
CONTACT: DR. RAMONA BISHOP
OWNER:
BRYAN BAYLES
51 RED CYPRESS CT
DANVILLE, CA 94506
ARCHITECT:
KINYON + KIM ARCHITECTS, INC.
1801 OAKLAND BLVD., SUITE 320
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596
(925) 934-1160
CONTACT: DAVID KIM, AIA
CIVIL:
ATLAS CIVIL DESIGN
872 HIGUERA STREET
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
(760) 718-8010
CONTACT: A.J. WHITAKER, PE
PROJECT MANAGEMENT:
JO ANN KOPLIN
[email protected]
(310) 717-4323
PROPOSED ELITE PUBLIC SCHOOLS - VALLEJO
241-255 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA
MAJOR USE PERMIT (PLANNING SUBMITTAL)
MUP SUBMITTAL SHEET INDEX
MUP1 MUP SUBMITTAL COVER SHEET
MUP2 FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
MUP3 SITE CONTEXT PHOTOS
MUP4 PRELIM SITE LAYOUT
MUP4.1 PRELIM DEMO SITE LAYOUT
MUP5 PHASE 1 PRELIM DEMO GROUND
FLOOR
MUP6 PHASE 1 PRELIM GROUND FLOOR
MUP7 PHASE 2 PRELIM GROUND FLOOR
MUP8 PHASE 2 PRELIM DEMO SECOND
FLOOR
MUP9 PHASE 2 PRELIM SECOND FLOOR
MUP10 PHASE 2 PRELIM ROOF PLAN
MUP11 PRELIM MASTER GROUND FLOOR
MUP12 PRELIM MASTER SECOND FLOOR
MUP13 PRELIM EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
1 of 6 TITLE SHEET
2 of 6 DEMOLITION AND SITE IMPROVEMENT
PLAN - A
3 of 6 DEMOLITION AND SITE IMPROVEMENT
PLAN - B
4 of 6 UTILITY PLAN
5 of 6 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN
6 of 6 DETAILS
L1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
TOTAL PARCEL AREA (PARCELS 1, 2 & 3): 30,666 S.F.
EXISTING & PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA: 1,425 S.F. (0.046 %)
EXHIBIT A
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP2
220118 Author Checker
EXHIBIT AFIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP3
220118 Author Checker
VIEW FROM GEORGIA STREET
NORTHEAST CORNER
VIEW FROM GEORGIA STREET
NORTHWEST CORNER
VIEW FROM SACRAMENTO STREET
SOUTHEAST CORNER
VIEW FROM SOUTH
NORTH VIEW OF GEORGIA STREET
WEST VIEW
EAST VIEW OF SACRAMENTO ST
WEST VIEW
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED ELITE
HIGH SCHOOL
EXISTING GROSS
BUILDING AREA: 34,819 S.F.
22,959 S.F. GROUND FLOOR
11,860 S.F. SECOND FLOOR.
400 MAX. STUDENT CAPACITY
DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT G
SCHOOL
ENTRY/EXIT
SCHOOL
ENTRY
SCHOOL
ENTRY/EXIT
SCHOOL
ENTRY/EXIT
EXIT
ONLY
EXIT
ONLY
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
EXISTING SIDEWALK
TO REMAIN EXISTING SIDEWALK
TO REMAIN
EXISTING SIDEWALK
TO REMAIN
PARCEL 4 EASEMENT
VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-530
VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-220
VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-170
EXISTING SIDEWALK
TO REMAIN
EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN
(N) PATHWAY
TO MEET ACCESSIBILITY
WROUGHT IRON
FENCING WITH GATES
OUTDOOR AREA OUTDOOR AREA
L
L
L
22' - 0"5' - 0"20' - 5"6' - 0 1/16"
4 BICYCLE SPACES
PER RACK. TOTAL OF
9 RACKS = 36 SPACES
BICYCLE RACKS, TYP. BICYCLE RACKS, TYP.
11' - 0"
8' - 0"
5' - 0"
6' - 0"18' - 0"5' - 0"18' - 6"
TRASH ROOM
ROLL UP DOOR
SACRAMENTO STREET
WROUGHT IRON
FENCING WITH GATES
GEORGIA STREET
WROUGHT IRON FENCING WITH GATES
LOADING AND UNLOADING STUDENTS
MONDAY - FRIDAY: 8:00 AM TO 9:00 AM (MORNING)
MONDAY - FRIDAY: 3:00 PM TO 4:00 PM (AFTERNOON)
WEDNESDAY: 1:00 PM TO 2:00 PM (EARLY DISMISSAL)
FOOD DELIVERY
MONDAY - FRIDAY: 8:00 AM TO 9:00 AM (MORNING)
MONDAY - FRIDAY: 11:00 AM TO 1:00 PM (AFTERNOON)
AT OTHER TIMES
QUEUE LANE - PARALLEL PARKING
ACCESSIBLE DROP OFF AREA
40' - 0"
9' - 0"
QUEUE LANE - PARALLEL PARKING AT OTHER TIMES
NO PARKING FOR LOADING & UNLOADING
9' - 0"
PROVIDE SIGNAGE
NO PARKING DURING
NON SCHOOL HOURS
PROVIDE SIGNAGE:
NO PARKING DURING
NON SCHOOL HOURS
VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-270
SOLTRANS
APN: 0055-170-540
GEORGIA ST GEORGIA ST
YORK ST
SACRAMENTO ST SACRAMENTO ST
MARIN ST
ELITE
PUBLIC HS
VIRGINA ST
ROUTE
ROUTE
LOT G2 - APN:
0055-170-530
SOLTRANS - APN:
0055-170-540
LOT K
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP4
220118 dek dek
1/16" = 1'-0"
PRELIM SITE LAYOUT 0' 16'8' 32 FEET4'
ELITE Public
Schools
EXHIBIT A
PARKING MAP
PROPOSED ELITE
HIGH SCHOOL
EXISTING GROSS
BUILDING AREA: 34,819 S.F.
22,959 S.F. GROUND FLOOR
11,860 S.F. SECOND FLOOR.
400 MAX. STUDENT CAPACITY
DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT G
SCHOOL
ENTRY/EXIT
SCHOOL
ENTRY
SCHOOL
ENTRY/EXIT
SCHOOL
ENTRY/EXIT
EXIT
ONLY
EXIT
ONLY
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
EXISTING SIDEWALK
TO REMAIN EXISTING SIDEWALK
TO REMAIN
EXISTING SIDEWALK
TO REMAIN
PARCEL 4 EASEMENT
VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-530
VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-220
VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-170
EXISTING SIDEWALK
TO REMAIN
EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN
(N) PATHWAY
TO MEET ACCESSIBILITY
WROUGHT IRON
FENCING WITH GATES
OUTDOOR AREA OUTDOOR AREA
L
L
L
4 BICYCLE SPACES
PER RACK. TOTAL OF
9 RACKS = 36 SPACES
BICYCLE RACKS, TYP. BICYCLE RACKS, TYP.
TRASH ROOM
ROLL UP DOOR
SACRAMENTO STREET
WROUGHT IRON
FENCING WITH GATES
GEORGIA STREET
WROUGHT IRON FENCING WITH GATES
SOLTRANS
APN: 0055-170-540
DEMO LEGEND
DEMOLISHED WALL
EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN
(E) STOREFRONT / DOOR TO BE
REMOVED
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP4.1
220118 Author Checker
1/16" = 1'-0"
PRELIM DEMO SITE LAYOUT
EXHIBIT A
0' 16'8' 32 FEET4'
UP UP
UP
WALL LEGEND
DEMOLISHED WALL
EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN
(E) STOREFRONT / DOOR TO BE
REMOVED
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
RAMP
UP
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP5
220118 Author Checker
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
1/8" = 1'-0"
PHASE 1 EXISTING DEMO
PRELIM GROUND FLOOR
EXISTING FIXTURES TO BE REMOVED - PHASE 1
Type Count
HAND SINK 10
KITCHEN SINK 6
WALL HUNG URINAL 2
WATER CLOSET 14
EXHIBIT A
UP
DN
DN
DN
DN
UP
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
GEORGIA STREET
SACRAMENTO STREET
(E) 7' - 2 1/2"
20 ATHLETIC
108 REGULAR
SUITE #101
56' - 0"
SUITE #104
35' - 8"
SUITE #103
31' - 7 1/2"
SUITE #105
39' - 2 1/2"
STUDENT
ENTRY
STUDENT
ENTRY
OUTDOOR EATING OUTDOOR EATING
RAMP
STUDENT
ENTRY
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
103 SF
MDF104
93 SF
ELECT.105
136 SF
WOMENS110
127 SF
MENS111
835 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #3103
1292 SF
HALLWAY100
651 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #2102
370 SF
LIBRARY106
718 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #4108
586 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #1101
1292 SF
HALLWAY100
312 SF
ADMIN109
101 SF
STORAGE113
69 SF
SHOWER #1204
70 SF
SHOWER #2206
123 SF
BOYS
RESTROOM205
124 SF
WOMENS207
321 SF
BOYS LOCKERS203
279 SF
GIRLS LOCKERS208
174 SF
MAIN ENTRY201
990 SF
PE SPACE #1202
191 SF
PE STORAGE211
172 SF
OFFICE #2302 104 SF
OFFICE #1301
149 SF
RECEPTION303
108 SF
OFFICE #3304
66 SF
RESTROOM305
738 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #6306
781 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #5307
247 SF
TRASH AREA308
419 SF
SERVERY402
203 SF
STORAGE403
66 SF
RESTROOM404
591 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #7501
584 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #8502
970 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #9503
596 SF
ART LAB506
180 SF
MENS505
SUITE #102
31' - 5 1/4"
38 SF
FIRE RISER407
1003 SF
HALLWAY500
3292 SF
CAFETERIA/
MPR401
115 SF
ELECT.405
320 SF
HALLWAY300
(PHASE 1)(PHASE 1)
75' - 11 1/4"
117' - 4 3/4"
695 SF
PE SPACE #2210
421 SF
HALLWAY209
20 ATHLETIC
72 REGULAR
ROLL UP DOOR
ACCESSIBLE LIFT
FOR SECOND
FLOOR
201 SF
WOMENS504
135 SF
STORAGE507
FUTURE
ELEVATOR
FUTURE
MACHINE
ROOM
597 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #3107 117 SF
STORAGE115
106 SF
STORAGE114
650 SF
HALLWAY309
(PHASE 1) (PHASE 1)
UP
117 SF
JANITOR112
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP6
220118 Author Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"
PHASE 1 PRELIM FLOOR PLAN
EXHIBIT A
PHASE LEGEND
DN
DN
DN
DN
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
20 ATHLETIC
72 REGULAR
SUITE #101
56' - 0"
SUITE #102
31' - 5"
SUITE #104
35' - 8"
SUITE #103
31' - 7 1/2"
SUITE #105
39' - 2 1/2"
STUDENT
ENTRY
STUDENT
ENTRY
RAMP
RAMPRAMP
RAMP
RAMP
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
586 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #1101
651 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #2102
597 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #4107
370 SF
LIBRARY106
312 SF
ADMIN109
101 SF
STORAGE113
49 SF
MDI104
93 SF
ELECT.105
191 SF
PE STORAGE211
695 SF
PE SPACE #2210
321 SF
BOYS LOCKERS203
279 SF
GIRLS LOCKERS208
123 SF
MENS205
124 SF
WOMENS207
70 SF
SHOWER #2206
69 SF
SHOWER #1204
250 SF
TRASH AREA308
781 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #7307
738 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #6306
172 SF
OFFICE302 97 SF
OFFICE301
108 SF
OFFICE304
66 SF
RESTROOM305
149 SF
RECEPTION303
174 SF
MAIN ENTRY201
320 SF
HALLWAY300
3292 SF
CAFETERIA/
MPR401
419 SF
SERVERY402 203 SF
STOR.403
115 SF
GAS405
66 SF
RESTROOM404
596 SF
ART LAB506
201 SF
WOMENS504
970 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #10503
584 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #9502
591 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #8501
136 SF
WOMENS110
127 SF
MENS111
1003 SF
HALLWAY500
823 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #3103
(PHASE 2)
421 SF
HALLWAY209
990 SF
PE SPACE #1202
20 ATHLETIC
108 REGULAR
ACCESSIBLE LIFT
FOR SECOND
FLOOR
718 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #5108
117 SF
STORAGE115
106 SF
STORAGE114
180 SF
MENS505
75 SF
MECH. ROOM508
123 SF
ELEVATOR509
135 SF
STORAGE507
117 SF
JANITOR112
UP
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP7
220118 IDA DEK
1/8" = 1'-0"
PHASE 2 PRELIM GROUND
FLOOR 0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
EXHIBIT A
PHASE LEGEND
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
DN.
DN.
UP
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
OPEN TO BELOW
DN.
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
WALL LEGEND
DEMOLISHED WALL
EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN
(E) STOREFRONT / DOOR TO BE
REMOVED
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP8
220118 Author Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"
PHASE 2 EXISTING DEMO
PRELIM SECOND FLOOR 0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
EXISTING FIXTURES TO BE REMOVED - PHASE 2
Type Count
HAND SINK 10
KITCHEN SINK 3
WALL HUNG URINAL 1
WATER CLOSET 12
EXHIBIT A
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
DN.
DN.
UP
ADA
LIFT
DN.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(PHASE 2)
(PHASE 2)
1093 SF
STORAGE602
702 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #12601
627 SF
STEM LAB #1612
597 SF
STEM LAB #2610
742 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #14604
77 SF
JANITOR620
79 SF
STORAGE613
104 SF
STORAGE611
586 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #16609
669 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #15608
1213 SF
OPEN ADMIN
SPACE619
855 SF
OPEN ADMIN
SPACE612
238 SF
TEACHERS
LOUNGE613
87 SF
RESTROOM614
92 SF
RESTROOM615 186 SF
OFFICE616
1176 SF
OPEN ADMIN
SPACE617
125 SF
OFFICE618
439 SF
HALLWAY614
608 SF
HALLWAY 2600
64 SF
ELEVATOR607
OPEN TO BELOW
110 SF
IT621
206 SF
WOMENS605
205 SF
MENS606(E) COL.
(E) COL.
DN.
DN.
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP9
220118 Author Checker
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
EXHIBIT A
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIM PHASE 2 SECOND
FLOOR
PHASE LEGEND
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
1/2" / 1'-0" 1/2" / 1'-0"
1/4" / 1'-0"
(E) COL.
(E) ROOF HATCH TO REMAIN
(E) ROOF HATCH TO REMAIN
AC-3
AC-10
AC-2
AC-11
EF-5
EF-1
AC-5
AC-12
AC-13
AC-8
AC-1
AC-4
AC-14
AC-15
AC-6AC-7 EF-3
EF-2
EF-4
AC-9
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
ROOF LEGEND
EXISTING TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING TO REMAIN
NEW UNITS TO BE
INSTALLED
EXISTING UNITS TO BE
REMOVED
NEW TO BE INSTALLED
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP10
220118 IDA DEK
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIM ROOF PLAN
EXHIBIT A
DN
DN
DN
DN
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
STUDENT
ENTRY
STUDENT
ENTRY
STUDENT
ENTRY
SUITE #101
56' - 0"
SUITE #102
31' - 5"
SUITE #104
35' - 8"
SUITE #103
31' - 7 1/2"
SUITE #105
39' - 2 1/2"
20 ATHLETIC
108 REGULAR
20 ATHLETIC
72 REGULAR
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
36' - 4 1/4"51' - 0 1/4"21' - 0"
31' - 5 1/4"
6' - 11 3/4"
22' - 6"
93 SF
ELECT.105
586 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #1101
651 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #2102
370 SF
LIBRARY106
597 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #4107
312 SF
ADMIN109
136 SF
WOMENS110
127 SF
MENS111
117 SF
JANITOR112
990 SF
PE SPACE #1202
321 SF
BOYS LOCKERS203
279 SF
GIRLS LOCKERS208
123 SF
MENS205
124 SF
WOMENS207
69 SF
SHOWER #1204
70 SF
SHOWER #2206
191 SF
PE STORAGE211
738 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #6306
781 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #7307
250 SF
TRASH AREA308
108 SF
OFFICE304 66 SF
RESTROOM305
149 SF
RECEPTION303
172 SF
OFFICE302
97 SF
OFFICE301
419 SF
SERVERY402
203 SF
STOR.403
115 SF
GAS405
61 SF
RESTROOM404
3279 SF
CAFETERIA/
MPR401
996 SF
HALLWAY500
591 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #8501
584 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #9502
970 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #10503
38 SF
FIRE RISER407
75' - 11 1/4"
(PHASE 1)(PHASE 1)
36' - 1 1/4"
695 SF
PE SPACE #2210
421 SF
HALLWAY209
32' - 10"32' - 9 1/4"
24' - 10"29' - 10"12' - 10 13/16"
24' - 0 5/8"
26' - 4 5/16"
23' - 11 1/16"
19' - 11 1/16"
19' - 11 1/16"
21' - 9 7/8"
ROLL UP DOOR
49 SF
MDF104
TEACHING WALL
TEACHING WALL
TEACHING WALL
TEACHING WALL
TEACHING WALL
TEACHING WALL
TEACHING WALL
TEACHING WALL
TEACHING WALL
201 SF
WOMENS504
180 SF
MENS505
120 SF
ELEVATOR509
50 SF
MECH. ROOM508
718 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #5108
117 SF
STORAGE113
106 SF
STORAGE114
823 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #3103
ACCESSIBLE LIFT
FOR SECOND
FLOOR
(PHASE 1) (PHASE 1)
(PHASE 2)
37' - 11 1/8"
23' - 1 3/8"
31' - 11 3/4"33' - 7 1/8"
596 SF
Room506 134 SF
STORAGE507
UP
UP
101 SF
STORAGE113
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP11
220118 Author Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIM MASTER GROUND
FLOOR 0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
1 PLUMBING FIXTURES - GROUND FLOOR
TYPE
COUNT
EXISTING NEW
3 COMP SINK -
BI-LEVEL WATER FOUNTAIN & FILLING
SATION 1-
6FLOOR DRAIN -
14 HAND SINK10
1 HAND SINK HS-31-
SHOWER 2 -
32URINALS
WATER CLOSET 1314
-6KITCHEN SINK
1 DIFFERENCE
1 6
4 1
2 1
-1
-6
EXHIBIT A
PE PROGRAM SPACE
CAFETERIA 3,270 SF
PE SPACE #1 989 SF
PE SPACE #2 694 SF
BOYS LOCKERS 321 SF
SHOWERS #1 69 SF
MENS 123 SF
SHOWERS #2 70 SF
WOMENS 124 SF
GIRLS LOCKERS 278 SF
HALLWAY 420 SF
PE STORAGE 200 SF
LEARNING SPACE #1 712 SF
LEARNING SPACE #2 768 SF
LEARNING SPACE #3 908 SF
LEARNING SPACE #4 597 SF
LEARNING SPACE #5 717 SF
TOTAL 10,260 SF
PHASE LEGEND
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
DN.
DN.
DN.
UP
ADA
LIFT
DN.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
702 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #12601
1093 SF
STORAGE602
742 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #14604627 SF
STEM LAB #1612
595 SF
STEM LAB #2610
586 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #16609
669 SF
LEARNING
SPACE #15608
205 SF
MENS606
206 SF
WOMENS605
1213 SF
OPEN ADMIN
SPACE619
855 SF
OPEN ADMIN
SPACE612
238 SF
TEACHERS
LOUNGE613
87 SF
RESTROOM614
92 SF
RESTROOM615 186 SF
OFFICE616
125 SF
OFFICE618
1176 SF
OPEN ADMIN
SPACE617
(PHASE 2)
(PHASE 2)
64 SF
ELEVATOR607
608 SF
HALLWAY 2600
439 SF
HALLWAY614
77 SF
JANITOR620
OPEN TO BELOW
104 SF
STORAGE611
79 SF
STORAGE613
110 SF
IT621
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP12
220118 Author Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIM MASTER SECOND
FLOOR 0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
PLUMBING FIXTURES - SECOND FLOOR
TYPE
COUNT
EXISTING NEW
2FLOOR DRAIN -
6 HAND SINK10
11URINALS
WATER CLOSET 712
33KITCHEN SINK
DIFFERENCE
2 -4
-
-5
-
EXHIBIT A
PHASE LEGEND
SUITE 105 LEVEL
0'-0"
+100.00'
(E) 2ND FLR.
12' - 6"
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Β± 33' - 9"
Β± 28' - 6"
NEW EXTERIOR LIGHT
FIXTURES, TYP.
NEW EXTERIOR LIGHT
FIXTURES, TYP.
KNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING KNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING KNOX BOX AT FENCEKNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING
A B C D E F G H
NEW EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES, TYP. KNOX BOX AT FENCEKNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING, TYP.
B.8A.8 B.7 E.8 F.4
SUITE 105 LEVEL
0'-0"
+100.00'
(E) 2ND FLR.
12' - 6"
ABCDEFGH
Β± 28' - 6"
NEW EXTERIOR LIGHT
FIXTURES, TYP.
KNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING
SUITE 105 LEVEL
0'-6"
+100.50'
B.6 A.8E.8F.4
(E) 2ND FLR.
12' - 6"
1234567891011
MUP13
5 NEW EXTERIOR LIGHT
FIXTURES, TYP.
4' - 5"
KNOX BOX AT FENCEKNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING, TYP. KNOX BOX AT FENCE KNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING KNOX BOX AT FENCE KNOX BOX AT (E)
BUILDING
KNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING
SUITE 105 LEVEL
0'-6"
+100.50'
6 FOOT HIGH WROUGHT IRON PAINTED BLACK WITH 6
INCH TALL FINAL, WELDED TO PICKETS
VERTICAL PICKETS: 3/4" SQUARE, 16 GA. TUBING @
3.75 INCHES O.C.
3 HORIZONTAL RAILS: 1.5" x 1/8" THICK PUNCHED
CHANNEL. PICKETS, RAILS AND POSTS TO BE WELDED.
POSTS: 2" X 2" 14 GA. POSTS
6' - 0"
KEYED LOCKABLE LATCH SET
3 FEET WIDE GATE WHERE OCCURS AT NORTH SIDE
ONLY, SEE SITE PLAN. CLOSING HINGES WITH
LOCKABLE LATCH SET
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.
Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:
Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP13
220118 Author Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIM GEORGIA STREET
ELEVATION NORTH
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIM EAST ELEVATION
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIM WEST ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIM SOUTH ELEVATION
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
3/8" = 1'-0"MUP13
5 FENCE ELEVATION
EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES
EXHIBIT A
GENERAL ACCESSIBILITY NOTESPROJECT INFORMATION
SHEET INDEX
CODE
ENGINEER'S NOTE
GEORGIA ST. VALLEJO
ADA IMPROVEMENT PLAN
241-255 GEORGIA STREET
CITY OF VALLEJO, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
NOTE TO CONTRACTOR
LEGEND
OWNER/DEVELOPER
BRYAN BAYLES
ENGINEER
ATLAS CIVIL DESIGN, INC.
SITE ADDRESS
ARCHITECT
KINYON + KIM ARCHITECTS, INC.
335
PL
335
335
335
CL
BASIS OF BEARINGS
ABBREVIATIONS
TITLE SHEET
SCOPE OF WORK
www.AtlasCivilDesign.com
Civil Engineering Site Optimization
DesignCivilCivil Design Tel: 1-213-810-8470
San Diego Orange County Los Angeles San Luis Obispo Monterey
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBYREVISIONSDATE
SHEET
OF
GEORGIA STREET - SCHOOL ADA
241-255 GEORGIA STREET
CITY OF VALLEJO, COUNTY OF SOLANO
6 Underground Service Alert
of Southern California
CITY OF
VALLEJO
SOLANO AVE
GEORGIA ST
SACRAMENTO ST
FLORIDA ST
SONOMA BLVD
29 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
VICINITY MAP
5TH ST
BENICIA RD
STEFFAN ST
LEMON ST
MAIN ST
YORK ST
CAPITOL ST
CURTOLA PKWY
MARIN ST ALAMEDA ST
MONTEREY ST
PROJECT SITE
780
80 NAPA RIVER
BENCHMARK INFORMATION
1 29 30
30 31
31 31
32 33
33 33
34 34
35 35
37 37
38 Rβ
β
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
A
P
R P
P
P
R
R
29 30
30 31
31 31
32 33
33 33
34 34
35 35
37 37
38 2
3 3
5 4
7 DEMOLITION NOTES
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
www.AtlasCivilDesign.com
Civil Engineering Site Optimization
DesignCivilCivil Design Tel: 1-213-810-8470
San Diego Orange County Los Angeles San Luis Obispo Monterey
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBYREVISIONSDATE
SHEET
OF
GEORGIA STREET - SCHOOL ADA
241-255 GEORGIA STREET
CITY OF VALLEJO, COUNTY OF SOLANO
6 Underground Service Alert
of Southern California
THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN HEREON HAVE
BEEN LOCATED FROM OBSERVED FIELD SURVEY
EVIDENCE AND EXISTING DRAWINGS, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: PLANS PROVIDED BY THE
CLIENT, UTILITY COMPANIES, AND MUNICIPAL AGENCIES.
THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEES THAT THE
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH
UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR
ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT
WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN
ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE
DOES NOT CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS
ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION
AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY
LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
UTILITY NOTE
DEMOLITION PLAN
AREA 1
DEMOLITION LEGEND
2 DEMOLITION & IMPROVEMENT PLAN - A
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
AREA 1
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1"= 10'
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1"= 10'
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 5 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 5
26 27
27 28
28 29
30 33
3129
GEORGIA STREET
(PUBLIC R.O.W.)
OH ELEC
26 27
27 28
28 29
30 33
3129
GEORGIA STREET
(PUBLIC R.O.W.)
OH ELEC
4 56
7 2
8 7
DEMOLITION NOTES
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
www.AtlasCivilDesign.com
Civil Engineering Site Optimization
DesignCivilCivil Design Tel: 1-213-810-8470
San Diego Orange County Los Angeles San Luis Obispo Monterey
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBYREVISIONSDATE
SHEET
OF
GEORGIA STREET - SCHOOL ADA
241-255 GEORGIA STREET
CITY OF VALLEJO, COUNTY OF SOLANO
6 Underground Service Alert
of Southern California
THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN HEREON HAVE
BEEN LOCATED FROM OBSERVED FIELD SURVEY
EVIDENCE AND EXISTING DRAWINGS, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: PLANS PROVIDED BY THE
CLIENT, UTILITY COMPANIES, AND MUNICIPAL AGENCIES.
THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEES THAT THE
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH
UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR
ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT
WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN
ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE
DOES NOT CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS
ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION
AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY
LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
UTILITY NOTE DEMOLITION PLAN
AREA 2
3 DEMOLITION & IMPROVEMENT PLAN - B
IMPROVEMENT PLAN
AREA 2
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1"= 10'
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1"= 10'
DEMOLITION LEGEND
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 5
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 5
5.18 OH ELEC
GEORGIA STREET
(PUBLIC R.O.W.)
SACRAMENTO STREET
(PUBLIC R.O.W.)
WATER CONSTRUCTION NOTES SEWER CONSTRUCTION NOTES FIRE CONSTRUCTION NOTES www.AtlasCivilDesign.com
Civil Engineering Site Optimization
DesignCivilCivil Design Tel: 1-213-810-8470
San Diego Orange County Los Angeles San Luis Obispo Monterey
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBYREVISIONSDATE
SHEET
OF
GEORGIA STREET - SCHOOL ADA
241-255 GEORGIA STREET
CITY OF VALLEJO, COUNTY OF SOLANO
6 Underground Service Alert
of Southern California
4 UTILITY PLAN
DEMOLITION NOTES
OFF-SITE CONSTRUCTION NOTES
33 34
34 35
36 36
36 37
3738
STOP
OH ELEC
P
P P P
P
R R
R R
R
R
R
P
A
PS S
S
S
SS
R
R
33 34
34 35
36 36
36 37
3738
STOP
OH ELEC
1 SACRAMENTO STREET
(PUBLIC R.O.W.)
1 2
3 3
4 4
4 5
6 6 6
6 6 6 6 6 6
2 7
www.AtlasCivilDesign.com
Civil Engineering Site Optimization
DesignCivilCivil Design Tel: 1-213-810-8470
San Diego Orange County Los Angeles San Luis Obispo Monterey
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBYREVISIONSDATE
SHEET
OF
GEORGIA STREET - SCHOOL ADA
241-255 GEORGIA STREET
CITY OF VALLEJO, COUNTY OF SOLANO
6 Underground Service Alert
of Southern California
UTILITY NOTE
DEMOLITION PLAN DEMOLITION LEGEND
5 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANIMPROVEMENT PLAN
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1"= 10'
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1"= 10'
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 3
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 3
DETAILS
www.AtlasCivilDesign.com
Civil Engineering Site Optimization
DesignCivilCivil Design Tel: 1-213-810-8470
San Diego Orange County Los Angeles San Luis Obispo Monterey
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBYREVISIONSDATE
SHEET
OF
GEORGIA STREET - SCHOOL ADA
241-255 GEORGIA STREET
CITY OF VALLEJO, COUNTY OF SOLANO
66 Memo
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.444.7301
Date: February 21, 2024
To: Christina Ratcliffe, Planning and Development Services Director, City of Vallejo CC: Erwin Ordonez, Interwest
From: Dimitri Antoniou, Pat Angell, Ascent
Subject: Noise and Vibration Study- Elite Charter School Project in Vallejo, CA Class 32 Exemption
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Class 32 is a Categorical Exemption under the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Cal.
Code Regs., Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.) that is available for qualifying infill development located in an urban area.
To qualify for a Class 32 Exemption, one criterion a project must meet is that approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to noise. The proposed project is characterized as an infill development project and is located in the City of Vallejo on a 0.74-acre site, surrounded by commercial uses.
The purpose of this Noise Study is to evaluate whether the project would have a significant effect related to noise.
This study includes a brief explanation of the project, applicable standards of significance, analysis of noise and vibration impacts, and conclusions. No airports or airstrips are located within a close proximity (i.e., within 2 miles) to the project site; thus, noise from airports is not discussed further.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project site is located at 241-255 Georgia Street on Assessorβs Parcel Number (APN) 0055-170-390 in Vallejo, CA.
The project site is bounded by an existing commercial development to the west, Georgia Street to the north, Sacramento Street to the east, and an existing parking lot and Vallejo Transit Center to the south. The project site includes approximately 30,666 square feet of parcel area and is currently occupied by a partial two-story building with a combined total square footage of 34,819 square feet. The building is currently partially occupied by a medical clinic.
The proposed project would provide a new public charter high school that would accommodate a maximum of 400 students and 35 staff. The proposed project would be completed in two separate phases as the school continues to grow enrollment and additional funds for construction become available. The existing structure would not be demolished but internal improvements would be made to reconfigure the building layout.
The initial development phase proposes developing approximately 18,000 square feet of interior space suitable for 13 classrooms, four offices, bathroom facilities, a serving kitchen, a multi-purpose room, a library alcove, and a future gymnasium on the ground floor. The second development phase proposes to develop five additional classrooms, storage areas, restrooms, a conference room, and four private offices on the second floor. The proposed project improvements would be Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible and would comply with State design and Final Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project February 21, 2024