Agenda packet — Vallejo City Council, April 30, 2024 (part 2 of 3)

Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 100 0 - 0 181 91
Stage 1 - - - - 89 -
Stage 2 - - - - 92 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1486 - - - 806 964
Stage 1 - - - - 932 -
Stage 2 - - - - 929 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1486 - - - 792 962
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 792 -
Stage 1 - - - - 916 -
Stage 2 - - - - 929 -

Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 2.6 0 9.6

HCM LOS A

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1486 - - - 850
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - - 0.085
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 9.6
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 380 120 0 491 176 247 169 10 181 101 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 380 120 0 491 176 247 169 10 181 101 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 413 130 0 534 62 302 137 0 197 110 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 1225 512 0 1164 511 1276 694 635 549 70
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3711 1552 0 3618 1547 2498 1856 1572 1072 1467 187 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 413 130 0 534 62 302 137 0 197 0 124 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 1552 0 1763 1547 1249 1856 1572 1072 0 1654 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 2.6 1.9 0.0 3.7 0.9 2.9 1.5 0.0 3.9 0.0 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 2.6 1.9 0.0 3.7 0.9 4.4 1.5 0.0 5.5 0.0 1.6 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.11
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1225 512 0 1164 511 1276 694 635 0 619 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.34 0.25 0.00 0.46 0.12 0.24 0.20 0.31 0.00 0.20 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 3619 1513 0 3438 1509 2372 1508 1218 0 1398 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 7.8 7.5 0.0 8.1 7.2 8.0 6.5 0.0 8.4 0.0 6.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 7.8 7.6 0.0 8.2 7.2 8.0 6.6 0.0 8.5 0.0 6.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 543 596 439 A 321
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.8 8.1 7.6 7.7
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.1 15.7 15.1 15.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 * 4.2 4.9 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 * 26 30.0 * 25
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.6 7.5 5.7 6.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.8
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 1: Sonoma Boulevard & Florida Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 110 60 30 22 71 60 20 774 15 60 580 80 Future Volume (veh/h) 110 60 30 22 71 60 20 774 15 60 580 80 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 116 63 8 23 75 23 21 815 12 63 611 71 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 231 264 34 254 223 68 537 1359 1146 429 1359 1146 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Sat Flow, veh/h 1275 1611 205 1306 1358 416 752 1856 1565 657 1856 1565 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 116 0 71 23 0 98 21 815 12 63 611 71 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1275 0 1816 1306 0 1775 752 1856 1565 657 1856 1565 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.5 0.0 2.9 1.3 0.0 4.2 1.0 17.8 0.2 4.3 11.2 1.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.7 0.0 2.9 4.2 0.0 4.2 12.1 17.8 0.2 22.1 11.2 1.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 231 0 298 254 0 291 537 1359 1146 429 1359 1146 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.00 0.24 0.09 0.00 0.34 0.04 0.60 0.01 0.15 0.45 0.06 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 352 0 470 378 0 459 537 1359 1146 429 1359 1146 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 36.6 0.0 30.9 32.8 0.0 31.4 7.0 5.4 3.1 10.7 4.5 3.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 0.0 1.3 0.4 0.0 1.8 0.2 5.9 0.0 0.6 3.4 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.2 0.0 31.1 32.8 0.0 31.7 7.1 7.0 3.1 10.7 4.6 3.2 LnGrp LOS D A C C A C A A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 187 121 848 745
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.9 31.9 6.9 5.0
Approach LOS C C A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 66.9 18.1 66.9 18.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 * 4.2 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 54.2 * 22 54.2 * 22
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 19.8 13.7 24.1 6.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.1 0.9 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.5
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 2: Mare Island Way & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 40 30 20 30 20 135 40 733 26 75 540 10 Future Volume (veh/h) 40 30 20 30 20 135 40 733 26 75 540 10 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 32 2 32 21 14 43 780 26 80 574 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 66 235 15 52 124 83 66 1065 36 101 1157 20
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1706 107 1767 956 637 1767 3475 116 1767 3544 62 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 43 0 34 32 0 35 43 396 410 80 285 299 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 0 1813 1767 0 1593 1767 1763 1828 1767 1763 1843 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.0 8.6 8.6 1.9 5.6 5.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 1.0 8.6 8.6 1.9 5.6 5.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 66 0 250 52 0 207 66 540 560 101 576 602 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.14 0.61 0.00 0.17 0.65 0.73 0.73 0.79 0.50 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 621 0 637 621 0 560 373 1404 1457 373 1404 1469 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.3 0.0 16.2 20.5 0.0 16.5 20.3 13.2 13.2 19.9 11.5 11.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.0 0.0 0.1 4.3 0.0 0.1 4.0 0.7 0.7 5.0 0.2 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 2.7 2.8 0.8 1.7 1.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.2 0.0 16.3 24.7 0.0 16.7 24.2 14.0 13.9 24.9 11.8 11.8 LnGrp LOS C A B C A B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 77 67 849 664
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.7 20.5 14.5 13.4
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.5 18.1 6.3 10.9 6.6 18.9 6.6 10.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 9.0 34.0 15.0 15.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.9 10.6 2.8 2.7 3.0 7.6 3.0 2.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.6
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 101 20 20 72 50 33 64 43 45 50 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 101 20 20 72 50 33 64 43 45 50 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 25 125 16 25 89 34 41 79 25 56 62 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 223 553 64 230 447 148 271 253 68 336 232 32 Arrive On Green 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 119 1468 169 129 1186 392 307 1072 287 482 984 137 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 166 0 0 148 0 0 145 0 0 129 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1756 0 0 1707 0 0 1666 0 0 1602 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.15 0.10 0.17 0.23 0.28 0.17 0.43 0.09
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 840 0 0 824 0 0 592 0 0 600 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2747 0 0 2668 0 0 2146 0 0 2068 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.1 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 166 148 145 129
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.1 5.0 7.6 7.5
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.3 10.0 13.3 10.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 28.0 35.0 28.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 3.6 3.5 3.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.2
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 32 138 19 47 90 30 22 65 29 30 78 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 32 138 19 47 90 30 22 65 29 30 78 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.95 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.93 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 36 157 14 53 102 19 25 74 8 34 89 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 244 469 38 308 376 58 264 444 41 279 432 37
Arrive On Green 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 165 1461 118 297 1172 180 198 1400 129 235 1362 117 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 207 0 0 174 0 0 107 0 0 132 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1744 0 0 1649 0 0 1728 0 0 1714 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.17 0.07 0.30 0.11 0.23 0.07 0.26 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 751 0 0 742 0 0 749 0 0 748 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2493 0 0 2348 0 0 2082 0 0 2073 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.7 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.9 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 207 174 107 132
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.9 5.8 5.6 5.7
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.1 11.0 11.1 11.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 25.0 30.0 25.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 2.9 3.9 3.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.5 1.3 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.8
HCM 6th LOS A
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 5: Sonoma Boulevard & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 55 155 24 26 111 90 35 651 58 100 417 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 55 155 24 26 111 90 35 651 58 100 417 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 158 18 27 113 16 36 664 33 102 426 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 100 205 21 86 286 285 119 1039 877 189 1113 920 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.56 0.56 0.11 0.60 0.60 Sat Flow, veh/h 253 1104 114 189 1538 1534 1767 1856 1567 1767 1856 1535 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 232 0 0 140 0 16 36 664 33 102 426 36 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1471 0 0 1727 0 1534 1767 1856 1567 1767 1856 1535 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.6 20.8 0.8 4.6 10.1 0.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.3 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.7 1.6 20.8 0.8 4.6 10.1 0.8 Prop In Lane 0.24 0.08 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 326 0 0 372 0 285 119 1039 877 189 1113 920 V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.06 0.30 0.64 0.04 0.54 0.38 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 521 0 0 573 0 469 249 1039 877 249 1113 920 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.96 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.7 0.0 0.0 30.5 0.0 28.5 37.7 12.8 8.4 36.0 8.8 7.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 3.0 0.1 0.8 0.9 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.7 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.3 0.7 8.7 0.3 2.0 3.9 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.8 0.0 0.0 30.7 0.0 28.5 38.3 15.8 8.5 36.8 9.7 7.0 LnGrp LOS C A A C A C D B A D A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 232 156 733 564
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.8 30.5 16.6 14.5
Approach LOS C C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.8 52.2 20.0 9.4 55.6 20.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.7 4.6 * 4.2 3.7 4.6 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.0 34.5 * 26 12.0 34.5 * 26 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.6 22.8 15.3 3.6 12.1 7.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.7
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 6: Mare Island Way & Maine Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 51 0 63 10 656 40 80 580 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 51 0 63 10 656 40 80 580 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 0 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 0 0 55 0 68 11 705 39 86 624 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0
Cap, veh/h 209 269 0 464 0 227 26 1539 85 144 1785 0
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.51 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1322 1856 0 1760 0 1568 1767 3392 188 1767 3618 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 0 55 0 68 11 366 378 86 624 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1322 1856 0 1760 0 1568 1767 1763 1817 1767 1763 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.3 0.2 4.9 4.9 1.6 3.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.3 0.2 4.9 4.9 1.6 3.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 209 269 0 464 0 227 26 800 824 144 1785 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.30 0.43 0.46 0.46 0.60 0.35 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 787 1079 0 1233 0 912 617 1537 1585 925 3075 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 13.1 16.8 6.5 6.5 15.3 5.1 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.7 10.9 0.9 0.9 3.9 0.3 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.1 1.2 1.2 0.7 0.7 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.1 0.0 13.9 27.8 7.4 7.3 19.2 5.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A B A B C A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 0 123 755 710
Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 13.5 7.6 7.0
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.3 19.6 8.5 4.5 21.4 8.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 30.0 20.0 12.0 30.0 20.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 6.9 0.0 2.2 5.7 3.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 8.6 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.8
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

HCM 6th TWSC Elite Charter School TIA
7: Maine Street & Sacramento Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 80 73 30 50 29
Future Vol, veh/h 10 80 73 30 50 29
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 0 4 2 7
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87
Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 11 92 84 34 57 33

Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 122 0 - 0 221 112
Stage 1 - - - - 105 -
Stage 2 - - - - 116 -
Critical Hdwy 4.13 - - - 6.43 6.23
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.43 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.227 - - - 3.527 3.327
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1459 - - - 765 938
Stage 1 - - - - 917 -
Stage 2 - - - - 906 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1453 - - - 753 928
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 753 -
Stage 1 - - - - 906 -
Stage 2 - - - - 902 -

Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0.8 0 10

HCM LOS B

Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 1453 - - - 809
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - - 0.112
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 10
HCM Lane LOS A A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.4
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 452 151 0 373 223 283 422 40 247 178 20 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 452 151 0 373 223 283 422 40 247 178 20 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1856 1856 0 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 471 157 0 389 71 197 577 0 257 185 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 0 1051 445 0 998 444 656 1712 503 706 61
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.28 0.46 0.46 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.46 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 3711 1572 0 3618 1569 1171 3711 1572 651 1530 132 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 471 157 0 389 71 197 577 0 257 0 201 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1856 1572 0 1763 1569 1171 1856 1572 651 0 1663 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 3.7 2.8 0.0 3.2 1.2 4.4 3.5 0.0 10.2 0.0 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 3.7 2.8 0.0 3.2 1.2 7.1 3.5 0.0 13.7 0.0 2.6 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 1051 445 0 998 444 656 1712 503 0 767 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.45 0.35 0.00 0.39 0.16 0.30 0.34 0.51 0.00 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 3124 1324 0 2968 1321 937 2604 725 0 1213 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 10.5 10.2 0.0 10.3 9.6 8.0 6.1 0.0 10.5 0.0 5.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 1.1 0.7 0.0 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 10.6 10.3 0.0 10.4 9.6 8.1 6.2 0.0 10.8 0.0 5.9 LnGrp LOS A B B A B A A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 628 460 774 A 458
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.5 10.3 6.7 8.7
Approach LOS B B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.0 20.6 15.0 20.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 * 4.2 4.9 * 4.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 * 26 30.0 * 25
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.7 15.7 5.2 9.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.8
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green.

User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Elite Charter School TIA 8: Sonoma Boulevard & Curtola Parkway Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Unsignalized Delay for [NBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

Appendix C:

Signal Warrants
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Exisiting
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 32 11 North/South
Through 33 38 x East/West
Right 6 13
Total 0 38 44 51
1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 9 5 38
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Exisiting
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 0 32 11 0 North/South
Through 0 0 33 38 x East/West
Right 0 6 0 13
Total 0 38 44 51
Intersection Geometry
1 3

9.2 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
38 Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Exisiting
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met

0.1 38 133
4 100 650
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Exisiting
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 40 9 North/South
Through 69 49 x East/West
Right 13 21
Total 0 53 78 70
1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 48 53
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 9 0 North/South
Through 0 0 69 49 x East/West
Right 0 13 0 21
Total 0 53 78 70
Intersection Geometry
1 3

9.6 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
53 Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Exisiting
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met

0.1 53 201
4 100 650
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 40 20 North/South
Through 40 40 x East/West
Right 10 20
Total 0 50 60 60
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 20 50
0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 20 0 North/South
Through 0 0 40 40 x East/West
Right 0 10 0 20
Total 0 50 60 60
Intersection Geometry
1 3

9.5 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
50 Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met

0.1 50 170
4 100 650
Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
T
otal Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Opening Year
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 40 10 North/South
Through 70 50 x East/West
Right 20 30
Total 0 60 80 80
1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 60 60
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 10 0 North/South
Through 0 0 70 50 x East/West
Right 0 20 0 30
Total 0 60 80 80
Intersection Geometry
1 3

9.7 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
60 Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Opening Year
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met

0.2 60 220
4 100 650
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 40 22 North/South
Through 40 59 x East/West
Right 25 21
Total 0 65 62 80
1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 42 65
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 22 0 North/South
Through 0 0 40 59 x East/West
Right 0 25 0 21
Total 0 65 62 80
Intersection Geometry
1 3

9.6 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
65 Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Opening Year Plus Project
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met

0.2 65 207
4 100 650
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 40 10 North/South
Through 70 63 x East/West
Right 29 30
Total 0 69 80 93
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 73 69
0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Opening Year Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 10 0 North/South
Through 0 0 70 63 x East/West
Right 0 29 0 30
Total 0 69 80 93
Intersection Geometry
1 3

9.7 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
69 Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met

0.2 69 242
4 100 650
Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
T
otal Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Opening Year Plus Project
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 40 20 North/South
Through 40 50 x East/West
Right 10 20
Total 0 50 60 70
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 30 50
0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 20 0 North/South
Through 0 0 40 50 x East/West
Right 0 10 0 20
Total 0 50 60 70
Intersection Geometry
1 3

0.1 50 180
4 100 650
Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
T
otal Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Cumulative
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 50 10 North/South
Through 80 60 x East/West
Right 20 30
Total 0 70 90 90
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 80 70
0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative
Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 0 50 10 0 North/South
Through 0 0 80 60 x East/West
Right 0 20 0 30
Total 0 70 90 90
Intersection Geometry
1 3

9.9 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
70 Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met

0.2 70 250
4 100 650
Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
T
otal Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Cumulative
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 40 22 North/South
Through 40 69 x East/West
Right 25 21
Total 0 65 62 90
1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 52 65
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour AM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 0 40 22 0 North/South
Through 0 0 40 69 x East/West
Right 0 25 0 21
Total 0 65 62 90
Intersection Geometry
1 3

9.6 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
65 Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
Total Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Cumulative Plus Project
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?
Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met

0.2 65 217
4 100 650
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 50 10 North/South
Through 80 30 x East/West
Right 29 73
Total 0 79 90 103
Major Street Minor Street Warrant MetMaine Street Sacramento Street 1 1
NO
Number of Approach Lanes
* Note: Traffic Volume for Major Street is Total Volume of Both Approches.

Traffic Volume for Minor Street is the Volume of High Volume Approach.

Traffic Volume (VPH) * 1 93 79
0 1
00 200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 Minor Street Higher Volume Approach - VPH
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - Vehicle Per Hour (VPH) Warrant 3B, Peak Hour
* Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street a
pproach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Source: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Caltrans, 2014 150*
1 00*
2 or More Lanes & 2 or More Lanes
1 Lane & 1 Lane
2 or More Lanes & 1 Lane
Project Elite Charter School TIA
Major Street Maine Street Scenario Cumulative Plus Project Minor Street Sacramento Street Peak Hour PM
Turn Movement Volumes Major Street Direction

NB SB EB WB
Left 0 50 10 0 North/South
Through 0 0 80 30 x East/West
Right 0 29 0 73
Total 0 79 90 103
Intersection Geometry
1 3
10 Approach with Worst Case Delay SB
79 Warrant Met
Warrant 3A, Peak Hour
NO
Total Approaches
Peak Hour Delay on
Minor Approach
(vehicle-hours)
Peak Hour Volume
on Minor Approach
(vph)
Peak Hour Entering
Volume Serviced
(vph)
Not Met Not Met

0.2 79 272
4 100 650
Stopped Delay (seconds per vehicle)
T
otal Vehicles on Approach
Number of Approach Lanes for Minor Street
Worst Case Delay for Minor Street
Not Met
Cumulative Plus Project
Limiting Value
Condition Satisfied?

Appendix D:

Vehicle Queues

Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Existing AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 63 108 62 64
v/c Ratio 0.04 0.07 0.10 0.10
Control Delay 2.7 2.7 4.2 4.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 2.7 2.7 4.2 4.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 3 3
Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 19 12 13
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1745 1675 1780 1826
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.04 0.06 0.03 0.04
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Existing AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 78 123 31 90
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.15 0.03 0.11
Control Delay 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 20 8 16
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1688 1729 1816 1810
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.07 0.02 0.05
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Existing PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 123 128 117 102
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.19 0.15
Control Delay 4.5 3.8 5.2 5.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.5 3.8 5.2 5.1
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 21 18 20 18
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1739 1675 1562 1673
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.06
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Existing PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 147 132 83 108
v/c Ratio 0.19 0.17 0.09 0.12
Control Delay 4.8 4.3 4.4 4.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.8 4.3 4.4 4.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 26 21 16 20
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1679 1646 1763 1773
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.06
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 83 130 83 82
v/c Ratio 0.06 0.09 0.10 0.10
Control Delay 2.5 2.6 3.4 3.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 2.5 2.6 3.4 3.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 1 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 22 15 16
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1689 1653 1761 1801
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.08 0.05 0.05
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Opening Year AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 100 133 44 100
v/c Ratio 0.13 0.17 0.05 0.13
Control Delay 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 22 10 18
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1746 1719 1771 1808
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.06
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 136 147 136 111
v/c Ratio 0.13 0.14 0.25 0.21
Control Delay 5.9 4.8 6.4 6.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 5.9 4.8 6.4 6.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 8 9 7
Queue Length 95th (ft) 25 21 23 20
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1696 1690 1526 1479
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.08
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Opening Year PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 159 148 103 125
v/c Ratio 0.18 0.17 0.11 0.16
Control Delay 4.6 4.1 4.4 4.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.6 4.1 4.4 4.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 24 19 23
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1670 1608 1739 1748
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.07
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 116 130 117 93
v/c Ratio 0.09 0.11 0.18 0.13
Control Delay 4.1 4.3 4.5 5.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.1 4.3 4.5 5.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 22 19 18
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1723 1634 1616 1807
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.05
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 199 44 124
v/c Ratio 0.23 0.33 0.07 0.21
Control Delay 5.3 6.7 5.7 6.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 5.3 6.7 5.7 6.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 13 2 9
Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 38 12 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1691 1472 1724 1581
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.14 0.03 0.08
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 149 150 161 117
v/c Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.28 0.22
Control Delay 6.1 5.0 6.4 6.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.1 5.0 6.4 6.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 8 10 8
Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 23 27 22
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1707 1691 1518 1433
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.08
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Opening Year Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 178 121 134
v/c Ratio 0.27 0.28 0.17 0.22
Control Delay 6.1 6.0 5.3 6.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.1 6.0 5.3 6.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 11 6 8
Queue Length 95th (ft) 34 31 23 27
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1661 1473 1522 1521
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.09
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 95 130 83 94
v/c Ratio 0.08 0.11 0.14 0.16
Control Delay 4.0 4.3 5.0 5.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.0 4.3 5.0 5.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 1 1
Queue Length 95th (ft) 16 22 15 18
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1705 1646 1638 1654
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.08 0.05 0.06
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative AM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 111 155 44 111
v/c Ratio 0.12 0.20 0.05 0.14
Control Delay 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.8
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 25 10 21
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1708 1713 1764 1805
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.09 0.02 0.06
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 173 148 136
v/c Ratio 0.16 0.17 0.26 0.25
Control Delay 5.8 5.0 6.7 7.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 5.8 5.0 6.7 7.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 10 10 10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 29 26 27 26
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1687 1633 1530 1454
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.09
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative PM
Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 181 159 114 137
v/c Ratio 0.27 0.24 0.15 0.22
Control Delay 6.3 5.5 5.5 6.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.3 5.5 5.5 6.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 9 7 8
Queue Length 95th (ft) 34 27 23 27
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1627 1614 1549 1529
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.09
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 130 117 105
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.11 0.18 0.15
Control Delay 4.2 4.4 4.4 5.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.2 4.4 4.4 5.3
Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 0 0 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 22 23 19 20
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1730 1629 1610 1784
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.06
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project AM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 172 221 44 135
v/c Ratio 0.24 0.35 0.07 0.22
Control Delay 5.4 6.7 5.8 7.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 5.4 6.7 5.8 7.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 15 2 10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 43 13 33
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1699 1493 1702 1577
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.15 0.03 0.09
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
3: Santa Clara Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 175 176 173 143
v/c Ratio 0.17 0.18 0.29 0.25
Control Delay 6.1 5.1 6.7 7.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.1 5.1 6.7 7.0
Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 10 12 11
Queue Length 95th (ft) 33 28 31 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 751 384 249 672
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1697 1632 1509 1455
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.10
Intersection Summary
Queues Elite Charter School TIA
4: Sacramento Street & Georgia Street Cumulative Plus Project PM Fehr & Peers Synchro 11 Report
Lane Group EBT WBT NBT SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 215 189 132 146
v/c Ratio 0.30 0.28 0.21 0.23
Control Delay 6.4 6.1 6.0 6.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.4 6.1 6.0 6.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 12 8 10
Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 35 27 31
Internal Link Dist (ft) 384 890 580 645
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph) 1653 1515 1519 1516
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.12 0.09 0.10
Intersection Summary
100 Pringle Avenue | Suite 600
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
www.fehrandpeers.com
Memo
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.444.7301

Date: February 21, 2024
To: Christina Ratcliffe, Planning Director, City of Vallejo CC: Erwin Ordonez, Principal Planner, Interwest
From: Dimitri Antoniou, Pat Angell, Ascent
Subject: Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project in Vallejo, Class 32 Categorical Exemption

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
A Class 32 exemption is a Categorical Exemption under the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., title 14, Section 15000 et seq.) that is available for qualifying infill development located in an urban area. To qualify for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption, one criterion a project must meet is that approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project is located in the City of Vallejo on a 0.704-acre site, surrounded by commercial uses, and is characterized as an infill development project. The purpose of this Air Quality Study is to evaluate whether the proposed project could potentially result in any significant effects related to air quality for purposes of determining consistency with the requirements of a Class 32 Categorical Exemption under CEQA.

This study includes a brief explanation of the project, applicable standards of significance, analysis of air quality impacts, emission modeling results, and conclusions.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project site is located at 241-255 Georgia Street on Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 0055-170-390 in the City of Vallejo, California in southwest Solano County. The 0.704-acre project site is bounded by an existing commercial development to the west, Georgia Street to the north, Sacramento Street to the east, and an existing parking lot and Vallejo Transit Center to the south. The project site includes approximately 30,666 square feet (sf) of parcel area and is presently developed with a partial two-story building with a combined total square footage of 34,819 square feet.

The building is currently partially occupied by a medical clinic.

The proposed project would provide a new public charter high school that would accommodate a maximum of 400 students and 35 staff. The proposed project would be completed in two separate phases as the school continues to grow enrollment and additional funds for construction become available. The existing structure would not be demolished but internal improvements would be made to reconfigure the building layout.

Page 2 ends

storage areas, restrooms, a conference room, and four private offices on the second floor. The proposed project improvements would be Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible and would comply with State design and construction standards. Other project improvements include adding school signage, developing perimeter fencing for security purposes, constructing curbs, ramps, and gutters; trenching along Georgia Street for underground utilities; removing/reconfiguring existing curbs to accommodate new parking; minor removal of shrubs and trees; adding a new ADA accessible ramp that would connect Sacramento Street to the rear entrance of the building; reconfiguring 16 parking spaces into eight parallel parking spaces along Sacramento Street, as well as adding 36 bicycle parking spaces. New perimeter fencing for security purposes, school signage, and 36 bicycle parking spaces would be included.

The school would operate Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. with occasional after-school activities and weekend events (e.g., parent engagement meetings). During the initial development phase, the school would house a maximum of 249 students, ten teaching staff, and 25 administrative staff. At full enrollment, there would be a maximum of 400 students and approximately 35 staff members.

The project site is located in the City of Vallejo in Solano County which is within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB). Air quality within the City of Vallejo is regulated by the US Environmental Protect Agency (EPA), California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). The SFBAAB is currently designated as a nonattainment area for State and national ozone standards and State particulate matter ambient air quality standards. The project site is surrounded by commercial land uses and the nearest sensitive receptors to the project site include the Vallejo John F. Kennedy Library, located approximately 0.08 miles northwest of the project site, north of Georgia Street and the multi-family residential dwellings along Maine Street, approximately 0.10 miles south of the project site.

APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
BAAQMD develops regulations and emissions reduction programs to control emissions of criteria air pollutants, ozone precursors (oxides of nitrogen [NOx] and reactive organic gases [ROG]), carbon monoxide (CO), toxic air contaminants (TACs), and odors within its jurisdiction. BAAQMD’s 2022 CEQA Guidelines (BAAQMD 2022), provides guidance for the preparation of CEQA documents as it pertains to air quality and climate change, including recommended thresholds of significance for evaluation of air quality impacts of projects in the SFBAAB. BAAQMD’s air quality thresholds of significance are tied to achieving or maintaining attainment designations, with the national and state air quality standards. The BAAQMD’s project level thresholds, which are scientifically substantiated, are numerical concentrations of criteria air pollutants considered to be protective of human health. Projects that do not exceed BAAQMD thresholds would not contribute to the nonattainment of state and subsequently national standards or result in increases in health-related impacts to sensitive receptors associated with increases in criteria air pollutants or ozone precursors. Applicable thresholds for project construction and operation are shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1 BAAQMD Thresholds of Significance for Construction and Operational-Related Criteria Air Pollutants and Precursors
Pollutant/Precursor
Operation
Construction
Average Daily Emission (lbs/day) Average Daily Emission (lbs/day) Maximum Annual Emissions (tons/year)
ROG 54 10 54
NOx 54 10 54
PM10 (exhaust) 82 15 82
PM2.5 (exhaust) 54 10 54
Final Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project
February 21, 2024

Page 3 ends

PM10/PM2.5 (fugitive dust) None BMPs
Notes:
lbs/day = pounds per day
NOx = oxides of nitrogen
PM2.5 = fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 2.5 micrometers PM10 = fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 10 micrometers ROG = reactive organic gases
BMP = Best Management Practices
Source: BAAQMD 2022
City if Vallejo General Plan
The policies and actions of the City of Vallejo 2040 General Plan Update which relate to air quality and are relevant to the project include (City of Vallejo 2017):
 Policy CP-1.12 Clean Air. Protect the community from harmful levels of air pollution.  Action CP-1.12B. Update City regulations to set BAAQMD-recommended limits for particulate emissions from construction, demolition, debris hauling, and utility maintenance.  Action CP-1.12C. Provide information regarding advances in air-quality protection measures to schools, homeowners, and operators of “sensitive receptors” such as senior and childcare facilities.  Action CP-1.12E. Periodically review the Building Code for consistency with the latest California Green Building Standards Code and assess the need for updates to require new construction and remodels to employ best practices and materials to reduce emissions, both during and after construction.

Basic Dust Control Measures
The project must comply with applicable city, regional, State, and federal regulations. General Plan Policy CP-1.12 notes that the city follows BAAQMD’s recommendations for particulate emissions from construction, demolition, debris hauling, and utility maintenance (City of Vallejo 2017). To comply with the best management practices (BMPs) required for all projects located within the BAAQMD, the following dust suppression BMPs would be implemented during project construction.
 All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day.
 All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered.  All visible mud or dirt trackout onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.  All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph.  All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.  All excavation, grading, and/or demolition activities shall be suspended when average wind speeds exceed 20 mph.
 All trucks and equipment, including their tires, shall be washed off prior to leaving the site.  Unpaved roads providing access to sites located 100 feet or further from a paved road shall be treated with a 6- to 12-inch layer of compacted layer of wood chips, mulch, or gravel.  Publicly visible signs shall be posted with the telephone number and name of the person to contact at the lead agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air Final Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project
February 21, 2024

Page 4 ends

District’s General Air Pollution Complaints number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

ANALYSIS
Construction and Operational Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Project construction and operation would result in emissions of ROG, NOX, respirable particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometers (PM10), and fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5). Construction generated emissions would be temporary (i.e., Phase 1 construction is expected to start in March 2024 and end in November 2024) and would result from demolition activities, off-road equipment, material delivery, worker commute trips, and other activities (e.g., building construction, asphalt paving, application of architectural coatings). The air quality modeling assumed that phase two would be similar in duration and construction intensity as phase one and conservatively assumed that phase two would begin construction immediately after phase one is complete. This approach is conservative because construction equipment fleets become cleaner over time as older equipment is replaced with newer equipment.

Operational criteria air pollutant emissions would result from mobile and area-wide sources of emissions from vehicle trips, electricity consumption for lighting and building use, the use of landscaping equipment or other small equipment, and the periodic application of architectural coating. The project’s mobile emissions were modeled using project specific trip rates identified in the traffic analysis conducted for this project (Fehr and Peers 2023). It should be noted that the air quality modeling assumed that the proposed development would result in new vehicular trips to the project site. However, currently, approximately 34,819 square feet of the existing two-story building is partially occupied by a medical clinic and once the project is complete, the total anticipated occupied space would be approximately 34,819 sf. Because the air emissions modeling did not adjust trips down for this anticipated decrease in medical clinic-associated trips from existing conditions, emissions estimates are conservative.

Construction and operation-generated emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2022.1.1.21 (CAPCOA 2022). Modeling was based on project-specific information (i.e., construction schedule and trip generation rates) and reasonable assumptions based on typical construction activities.

Where project-specific details were unavailable, default values in CalEEMod were used based on the project’s location and land use type. For detailed assumptions and modeling inputs, refer to Attachment A: Air Quality.

Table 2 below summarizes the daily average construction and operational-related emissions of criteria air pollutants in pounds per day, compared to BAAQMD-recommended thresholds of significance for the respective air pollutant emissions. As shown in Table 2, project construction and operation emissions would result in levels of ROG, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5. emissions that are below the respective BAAQMD-recommended thresholds of significance, indicating that project construction and operation would not result cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria air pollutant emissions.

Table 2 Estimated Criteria Air Pollutants and Precursors Emissions Associated with Project Construction and Operation
Emissions Source
Project Generated Emissions
ROG NOX PM10 a PM2.5 a
Phase 1 Project Construction (2024) Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.75 2.95 0.14 0.10 Phase 2 Project Construction (2025) Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.71 2.84 0.14 0.10 BAAQMD Construction Threshold of Significance 54 54 82 54 Exceed Significance Threshold? No No No No
Project Operation b Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day) / Annual (tons/year) 3.52 / 0.64 2.89 / 0.53 3.99 / 0.73 1.06 / 0.19 Final Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project
February 21, 2024

Page 5 ends

BAAQMD Operation Threshold of Significance Average Daily Emissions/Annual 54 / 10 54 / 10 82 / 15 54 / 10 Exceed Significance Threshold? No No No No
Notes:
lbs/day = pounds per day
NOx = oxides of nitrogen
PM2.5 = fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 2.5 micrometers PM10 = fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 10 micrometers ROG = reactive organic gases
a Construction PM emissions and thresholds are only reflective of PM exhaust emissions. b Operation emissions include mobile, energy, and area source criteria air pollutant emissions.

Source: modeled by Ascent 2023
As shown above in Table 2, project-generated construction and operational emissions would not exceed BAAQMD’s adopted daily or annual thresholds. Therefore, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria air pollutant for which the region is in nonattainment.

Potential to Result in Substantial Carbon Monoxide Concentrations CO emissions from traffic generated by the project would be the pollutant of greatest concern at the local level.

Congested intersections with a large volume of traffic have the greatest potential to cause high localized concentrations of carbon monoxide. BAAQMD recommends comparing a project’s attributes with the following screening criteria as a first step to evaluating whether the project would result in the generation of carbon monoxide concentrations that would substantially contribute to an exceedance of the Thresholds of Significance.

The project would result in a less than significant impact to localized carbon monoxide concentrations if:

1. The project is consistent with an applicable congestion management program for designated roads or highways, regional transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans.

2. The project would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 44,000 vehicles per hour

3. The project traffic would not increase traffic volumes at the affected intersections to more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited (e.g., tunnel, parking garage).

Based on the project’s trip generation traffic data, there would be 276 peak trips per hour (Fehr and Peers 2023).

The project’s 276 peak trips would be well below the 44,000 vehicle per hour BAAQMD screening levels. Therefore, the project would not result in localized concentrations that could exceed the applicable thresholds or expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of CO.

Potential to Result in Substantial Toxic Air Contaminant Concentrations Project construction would result in diesel TAC emissions from off-road construction equipment; however, these emissions would be temporary and cease once construction is complete. As shown in Table 2, PM exhaust emissions are minimal and would not result in substantial concentrations of TAC. The use of diesel-powered equipment would also be limited as primary construction activities involve minor improvements to the inside of the building and some minor upgrades to the exterior (e.g., landscape improvement, parking improvements, paving improvements). Further, the duration of construction activities would be short-term (i.e., less than one year for each phase), thus, exposure duration from construction related TACs would not be substantial. The project would not include construction of any stationary permitted TAC sources. Increases in vehicular trips generated by the project would be minimal and would not result in substantial increases of traffic volumes on nearby roads, thus, would not result in substantial increases in TAC concentrations.

Final Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project
February 21, 2024

Page 6 ends

Potential to Result in Substantial Odor Emissions
Construction of the project would result in minor odors from the use of off-road equipment and the application of architectural coatings. These odors would be intermittent and temporary, as they would only occur during the construction phase. The BAAQMD identifies land uses typically associated with potential odor impacts, including coffee roasters, industrial uses, waste and compost facilities, wastewater treatment plants, among others. The project would include a new public charter school with associated on-site amenities, none of which would include long-term odor sources. Therefore, the project would not introduce new odor sources to the project area, and the use of off- road equipment and the application of architectural coatings during construction would be intermittent and short- term and would not result in substantial odors; thus, the project would not result in substantial odor impacts to both existing and future sensitive receptors.

CONCLUSION
Project generated construction and operational criteria air pollutant and precursor emissions would not exceed BAAQMD recommended thresholds of significance for project related construction or operational emissions and thus would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. The project would generate minimal additional vehicle trips, would not result in substantial mobile or stationary sources of TACs, and would not result in sources of odors. Thus, approval of the project would not result in a significant effect related to air quality.

Final Air Quality Study - Elite Charter School Project
February 21, 2024

Page 7 ends

REFERENCES
Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2022. CEQA Guidelines. Available: https://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and- climate/california-environmental-quality-act-ceqa/updated-ceqa-guidelines. Accessed December 18, 2023.

California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. 2022. California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2022.1.1.21.

Available: https://www.caleemod.com/. Accessed December 19, 2023.

City of Vallejo. 2017. Propel Vallejo General Plan 2040. Available:
https://www.cityofvallejo.net/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=17961496. Accessed December 18, 2023.

Fehr and Peers. 2023. Trip Generation and Turning Movements.

Appendix A
Air Quality

sheet 2 sheet 3
PCC Pavement Area (sq ft) 2500 2300 66 101 241 257
AC Pavement Area (sq ft) 4000 2700 1109 928 399 363
Total pavement
area to be
demolished Sq ft 6500 5000 1175 1029 640 620 14964 sq ft Assumptions
Height of wall 12 ft
Weight of wall 2.2 lbs per sq ft
Weight of 1 ton 0.0005 lbs per ton
Phase 1
Wall Length of wall (ft) sqft of wall lbs tons
1 45 540 1188 0.594
2 45 540 1188 0.594
3 10 120 264 0.132
4 10 120 264 0.132
5 10 120 264 0.132
6 20 240 528 0.264
7 20 240 528 0.264
8 13 156 343.2 0.1716
9 7 84 184.8 0.0924
10 10 120 264 0.132
11 10 120 264 0.132
12 10 120 264 0.132
13 10 120 264 0.132
14 25 300 660 0.33
15 33 396 871.2 0.4356
16 14 168 369.6 0.1848
17 14 168 369.6 0.1848
18 14 168 369.6 0.1848
19 22 264 580.8 0.2904
20 25 300 660 0.33
21 22 264 580.8 0.2904
22 22 264 580.8 0.2904
23 12 144 316.8 0.1584
24 9 108 237.6 0.1188
25 9 108 237.6 0.1188
26 6 72 158.4 0.0792
27 14 168 369.6 0.1848
28 10 120 264 0.132
29 8 96 211.2 0.1056
30 8 96 211.2 0.1056
31 16 192 422.4 0.2112
32 8 96 211.2 0.1056
33 12 144 316.8 0.1584
34 12 144 316.8 0.1584
35 8 96 211.2 0.1056
36 8 96 211.2 0.1056
37 21 252 554.4 0.2772
38 9 108 237.6 0.1188
39 13 156 343.2 0.1716
40 8 96 211.2 0.1056
41 8 96 211.2 0.1056
42 13 156 343.2 0.1716
43 8 96 211.2 0.1056
44 11 132 290.4 0.1452
45 11 132 290.4 0.1452
46 11 132 290.4 0.1452
47 8 96 211.2 0.1056
48 16 192 422.4 0.2112
49 13 156 343.2 0.1716
50 9 108 237.6 0.1188
51 7 84 184.8 0.0924
52 9 108 237.6 0.1188
53 6 72 158.4 0.0792
54 8 96 211.2 0.1056
55 25 300 660 0.33
56 28 336 739.2 0.3696
57 28 336 739.2 0.3696
58 22 264 580.8 0.2904
59 28 336 739.2 0.3696
sheet 5
Demolition Quantities Estimate
Using the site plans, all components to be removed (e.g., pavement, walls) were estimated and converted to tons of debris for purpose of estimating necessary haul trucks to evaluate emissions 60 28 336 739.2 0.3696
61 28 336 739.2 0.3696
62 11 132 290.4 0.1452
63 11 132 290.4 0.1452
64 11 132 290.4 0.1452
65 15 180 396 0.198
66 15 180 396 0.198
67 13 156 343.2 0.1716
68 13 156 343.2 0.1716
69 13 156 343.2 0.1716
70 5 60 132 0.066
71 5 60 132 0.066
72 5 60 132 0.066
73 5 60 132 0.066
74 5 60 132 0.066
75 15 180 396 0.198
76 12 144 316.8 0.1584
77 14 168 369.6 0.1848
78 14 168 369.6 0.1848
79 8 96 211.2 0.1056
80 15 180 396 0.198
81 6 72 158.4 0.0792
82 10 120 264 0.132
83 15 180 396 0.198
84 10 120 264 0.132
85 15 180 396 0.198
86 42 504 1108.8 0.5544
87 108 1296 2851.2 1.4256
88 15 180 396 0.198
89 24 288 633.6 0.3168
90 15 180 396 0.198
91 24 288 633.6 0.3168
92 15 180 396 0.198
93 5 60 132 0.066
94 15 180 396 0.198
95 15 180 396 0.198
96 15 180 396 0.198
97 16 192 422.4 0.2112
98 14 168 369.6 0.1848
99 14 168 369.6 0.1848
100 14 168 369.6 0.1848
101 14 168 369.6 0.1848
102 12 144 316.8 0.1584
103 12 144 316.8 0.1584
104 12 144 316.8 0.1584
105 12 144 316.8 0.1584
106 14 168 369.6 0.1848
107 8 96 211.2 0.1056
108 10 120 264 0.132
109 10 120 264 0.132
110 10 120 264 0.132
111 10 120 264 0.132
112 6 72 158.4 0.0792
113 6 72 158.4 0.0792
114 6 72 158.4 0.0792
115 28 336 739.2 0.3696
116 28 336 739.2 0.3696
117 20 240 528 0.264
118 32 384 844.8 0.4224
119 38 456 1003.2 0.5016
120 22 264 580.8 0.2904
121 8 96 211.2 0.1056
122 29 348 765.6 0.3828
123 47 564 1240.8 0.6204
124 32 384 844.8 0.4224
125 14 168 369.6 0.1848
126 12 144 316.8 0.1584
127 24 288 633.6 0.3168
128 10 120 264 0.132
129 10 120 264 0.132
130 10 120 264 0.132
131 10 120 264 0.132
132 13 156 343.2 0.1716
133 10 120 264 0.132
134 13 156 343.2 0.1716
135 22 264 580.8 0.2904
136 16 192 422.4 0.2112
137 6 72 158.4 0.0792
138 6 72 158.4 0.0792
139 14 168 369.6 0.1848
140 18 216 475.2 0.2376
141 4 48 105.6 0.0528
142 4 48 105.6 0.0528
143 4 48 105.6 0.0528
144 4 48 105.6 0.0528
145 4 48 105.6 0.0528
146 4 48 105.6 0.0528
147 8 96 211.2 0.1056
148 4 48 105.6 0.0528
149 4 48 105.6 0.0528
150 5 60 132 0.066
151 12 144 316.8 0.1584
152 14 168 369.6 0.1848
153 5 60 132 0.066
154 5 60 132 0.066
2254 ft 27048 sq ft 59505.6 lbs 29.7528 tons
Phase 2
Wall Length of wall (ft) sqft of wall lbs tons
1 31 372 818.4 0.4092
2 18 216 475.2 0.2376
3 18 216 475.2 0.2376
4 27 324 712.8 0.3564
5 9 108 237.6 0.1188
6 14 168 369.6 0.1848
7 20 240 528 0.264
8 20 240 528 0.264
9 17 204 448.8 0.2244
10 24 288 633.6 0.3168
11 17 204 448.8 0.2244
12 34 408 897.6 0.4488
13 17 204 448.8 0.2244
14 25 300 660 0.33
15 22 264 580.8 0.2904
16 15 180 396 0.198
17 20 240 528 0.264
18 24 288 633.6 0.3168
19 10 120 264 0.132
20 10 120 264 0.132
21 25 300 660 0.33
22 36 432 950.4 0.4752
23 16 192 422.4 0.2112
24 16 192 422.4 0.2112
25 26 312 686.4 0.3432
26 8 96 211.2 0.1056
27 20 240 528 0.264
28 10 120 264 0.132
29 11 132 290.4 0.1452
30 19 228 501.6 0.2508
31 19 228 501.6 0.2508
32 15 180 396 0.198
33 18 216 475.2 0.2376
34 14 168 369.6 0.1848
35 12 144 316.8 0.1584
36 11 132 290.4 0.1452
37 8 96 211.2 0.1056
676 ft 8112 sq ft 17846.4 lbs 8.9232 tons
MUP 4.1
Wall Length of wall (ft) sqft of wall lbs tons
1 22 264 580.8 0.2904
2 22 264 580.8 0.2904
3 22 264 580.8 0.2904
4 11 132 290.4 0.1452
77 ft 924 sq ft 2032.8 lbs 1.0164 tons
Demo Items: Quantity weight (tons) Quantity weight (tons) Demo Items: Quantity weight (tons) Quantity weight (tons) Quantity weight (tons) Quantity weight (tons) Walls 154 29.7528 4 1.0164 Walls 37 8.9232
HVAC HVAC 20 3.7
Fans Fans 3 0.18
Curbs 8 0.5625 Curbs 4 0.1875
Pavement Pavement 129.9 243.75 187.5
Doors 73 3.65 5 0.25 Doors 34 1.7
Hand Sink 10 0.15 Hand Sink 10 0.15
Kitchen Sink 6 0.09 Kitchen Sink 3 0.045
Wall Hung Urinal 2 0.06 Wall Hung Urinal 1 0.03
Water Closet 14 0.84 Water Closet 12 0.72
Total 34.5428 1.8289 Total 15.4482 130.0875 187.5
Misc:
sidewalk 2
tree 2 2
shrub 1 4
retaining wall 2
Total Phase 1
Demo 36.3717 tons fence 1
pipe 1
Total Phase 2
Demo 333.0357 tons handrail 1
Assumptions:

Weight of Door 100 lbs
Weight of Hand sink 30 lbs
Weight of Kitchen Sink 30 lbs
Weight of Urinal 60 lbs
Weight of Water Closet 120 lbs
Weight of 1 ton 0.0005 lbs
Curbs/pavement made of concrete
Weight of 1 CF of Concrete 150 lbs
Height/width of curb 0.5 ft
Height of pavement 0.5 ft
Weight of HVAC 370 lbs
Weight of Fan 120 lbs
misc. demolition - 2 additional truck trips
Curbs quantity length (ft) width (ft) height (ft) cubic feet (CF) lbs tons 4 20 0.5 0.5 5 750 0.375
4 10 0.5 0.5 2.5 375 0.1875
total tons of curb removed 0.5625
Pavement
sheet 2 sheet 3
PCC Pavement Area (sq ft) 2500 2300 66 101 241 257
AC Pavement Area (sq ft) 4000 2700 1109 928 399 363
Total pavement area to be
demolished 6500 5000 1175 1029 640 620 14964 sq ft
cubic feet of pavement 3250 2500 7482 cubic ft
total tons of pavement 243.75 187.5 561.15 tons
Phase 1
Phase 2 (MUP 8) Sheet 5 Sheet 2
Phase 2
sheet 5
1732
129.9
Sheet 3Phase 1Phase 1 (MUP 5) Prelim Demo (MUP 4.1)
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 1 / 28
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
Operations (Phase 1 + 2, full project)
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 2 / 28

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 3 / 28

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 4 / 28

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 5 / 28

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 6 / 28

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Operational Y ear 2025
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.60
Precipitation (days) 34.8
Location 255 Georgia St #241, Vallejo, CA 94590, USA
County Solano-San Francisco
City Vallejo
Air District Bay Area AQMD
Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area
TAZ 823
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.21

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq
ft)
Population Description
High School 34.8 1000sqft 0.70 34,819 1,452 1,452 — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 7 / 28

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.91 3.58 0.08 5.62 5.70 0.08 1.42 1.50 26.6 7,341 7,368 3.02 0.30 27.0 7,561 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.44 4.12 0.08 5.62 5.70 0.08 1.42 1.50 26.6 6,939 6,966 3.06 0.33 0.83 7,143 Average
Daily (Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.52 2.89 0.07 3.92 3.99 0.07 0.99 1.06 26.6 5,165 5,192 2.95 0.23 8.42 5,343 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.64 0.53 0.01 0.72 0.73 0.01 0.18 0.19 4.41 855 860 0.49 0.04 1.39 885

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 3.80 3.17 0.05 5.62 5.67 0.05 1.42 1.47 — 6,759 6,759 0.29 0.30 26.9 6,881 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 8 / 28
Area 1.09 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 6.23 6.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.25 Energy 0.02 0.40 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 571 571 0.06 < 0.005 — 574 Water — — — — — — — — 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 — 13.8
Waste — — — — — — — — 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 — 85.3
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.13
Total 4.91 3.58 0.08 5.62 5.70 0.08 1.42 1.50 26.6 7,341 7,368 3.02 0.30 27.0 7,561 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 3.58 3.72 0.05 5.62 5.67 0.05 1.42 1.47 — 6,363 6,363 0.34 0.33 0.70 6,470 Area 0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.02 0.40 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 571 571 0.06 < 0.005 — 574 Water — — — — — — — — 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 — 13.8
Waste — — — — — — — — 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 — 85.3
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.13
Total 4.44 4.12 0.08 5.62 5.70 0.08 1.42 1.50 26.6 6,939 6,966 3.06 0.33 0.83 7,143 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 2.53 2.48 0.04 3.92 3.96 0.03 0.99 1.03 — 4,587 4,587 0.23 0.22 8.29 4,667 Area 0.97 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.07 3.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.08 Energy 0.02 0.40 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 571 571 0.06 < 0.005 — 574 Water — — — — — — — — 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 — 13.8
Waste — — — — — — — — 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 — 85.3
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.13
Total 3.52 2.89 0.07 3.92 3.99 0.07 0.99 1.06 26.6 5,165 5,192 2.95 0.23 8.42 5,343 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.46 0.45 0.01 0.72 0.72 0.01 0.18 0.19 — 759 759 0.04 0.04 1.37 773 Area 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.51 0.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.51 Energy < 0.005 0.07 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 94.6 94.6 0.01 < 0.005 — 95.0 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 9 / 28
Water — — — — — — — — 0.37 0.71 1.08 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.29 Waste — — — — — — — — 4.04 0.00 4.04 0.40 0.00 — 14.1
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.64 0.53 0.01 0.72 0.73 0.01 0.18 0.19 4.41 855 860 0.49 0.04 1.39 885

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School

3.80 3.17 0.05 5.62 5.67 0.05 1.42 1.47 — 6,759 6,759 0.29 0.30 26.9 6,881 Total 3.80 3.17 0.05 5.62 5.67 0.05 1.42 1.47 — 6,759 6,759 0.29 0.30 26.9 6,881 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School

3.58 3.72 0.05 5.62 5.67 0.05 1.42 1.47 — 6,363 6,363 0.34 0.33 0.70 6,470 Total 3.58 3.72 0.05 5.62 5.67 0.05 1.42 1.47 — 6,363 6,363 0.34 0.33 0.70 6,470 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School

0.46 0.45 0.01 0.72 0.72 0.01 0.18 0.19 — 759 759 0.04 0.04 1.37 773 Total 0.46 0.45 0.01 0.72 0.72 0.01 0.18 0.19 — 759 759 0.04 0.04 1.37 773

4.2. Energy
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 10 / 28

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School
— — — — — — — — — 89.2 89.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 90.1
Total — — — — — — — — — 89.2 89.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 90.1
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School
— — — — — — — — — 89.2 89.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 90.1
Total — — — — — — — — — 89.2 89.2 0.01 < 0.005 — 90.1
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School
— — — — — — — — — 14.8 14.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.9
Total — — — — — — — — — 14.8 14.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.9

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School

0.02 0.40 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 482 482 0.04 < 0.005 — 483 Total 0.02 0.40 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 482 482 0.04 < 0.005 — 483 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 11 / 28
———————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
High
School

0.02 0.40 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 482 482 0.04 < 0.005 — 483 Total 0.02 0.40 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 482 482 0.04 < 0.005 — 483 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School
< 0.005 0.07 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 79.8 79.8 0.01 < 0.005 — 80.0 Total < 0.005 0.07 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 79.8 79.8 0.01 < 0.005 — 80.0

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consumer
Products

0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectur
al
Coatings

0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscape
Equipment

0.25 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 6.23 6.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.25 Total 1.09 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 6.23 6.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.25 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consumer
Products

0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 12 / 28
Architectur
Coatings

0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consumer
Products

0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectur
al
Coatings

0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscape
Equipment

0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.51 0.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.51 Total 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.51 0.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.51

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School
— — — — — — — — 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 — 13.8
Total — — — — — — — — 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 — 13.8
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School
— — — — — — — — 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 — 13.8
Total — — — — — — — — 2.22 4.29 6.51 0.23 0.01 — 13.8
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 13 / 28

2.29—< 0.0050.041.080.710.37————————High
School
Total — — — — — — — — 0.37 0.71 1.08 0.04 < 0.005 — 2.29

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School
— — — — — — — — 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 — 85.3
Total — — — — — — — — 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 — 85.3
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School
— — — — — — — — 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 — 85.3
Total — — — — — — — — 24.4 0.00 24.4 2.44 0.00 — 85.3
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School
— — — — — — — — 4.04 0.00 4.04 0.40 0.00 — 14.1
Total — — — — — — — — 4.04 0.00 4.04 0.40 0.00 — 14.1

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 14 / 28
Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School
— — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.13
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.13
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School
— — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.13
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.13
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
School
— — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment
Type
ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 15 / 28
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment
Type
ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment
Type
ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 16 / 28
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 17 / 28
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequester
ed
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequester
ed
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 18 / 28
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequester
ed
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Y ear VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Y ear High School 838 0.00 0.00 218,412 7,983 0.00 0.00 2,081,259

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 19 / 28
0 0.00 52,229 17,410 —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) High School 159,582 204 0.0330 0.0040 1,504,466

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) High School 1,156,152 39,456

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
High School 45.3 —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 20 / 28

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced High School Household refrigerators
and/or freez
ers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
High School Other commercial A/C
and heat
pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
High School Stand-alone retail
refriger
ators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 < 0.005 1.00 0.00 1.00
High School Walk-in refrigerators
and freez
ers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Y ear Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 21 / 28
Equipment Type Fuel Type

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will
continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 13.9 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 5.10 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 22 / 28
Wildfire 10.1 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical
data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day
or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation
location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events.

Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation,
population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 2 0 0 N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 23 / 28
Extreme Precipitation 2 1 1 3
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 13.6
AQ-PM 39.2
AQ-DPM 75.4
Drinking Water 24.0
Lead Risk Housing 78.3
Pesticides 32.3
Toxic Releases 63.4
Traffic 10.0
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 24 / 28
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 64.4
Groundwater 93.0
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 81.0
Impaired Water Bodies 51.2
Solid Waste 43.9
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 99.8
Cardio-vascular 91.6
Low Birth Weights 99.2
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 72.5
Housing 95.2
Linguistic 49.1
Poverty 97.4
Unemployment 99.1

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 1.090722443
Employed 2.284101116
Median HI 0.128320287
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 26.30565892
High school enrollment 100
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 25 / 28
Preschool enrollment 16.65597331
Transportation —
Auto Access 0.397792891
Active commuting 89.25959194
Social —
2-parent households 0.641601437
Voting 31.59245477
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 23.58526883
Park access 81.35506224
Retail density 74.04080585
Supermarket access 16.64314128
Tree canopy 51.99538047
Housing —
Homeownership 3.849608623
Housing habitability 6.377518286
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 3.336327473 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 17.56704735
Uncrowded housing 51.79006801
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 49.23649429
Arthritis 1.4
Asthma ER Admissions 0.2
High Blood Pressure 1.5
Cancer (excluding skin) 22.7
Asthma 3.8
Coronary Heart Disease 1.7
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 26 / 28
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 1.1
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 30.6
Cognitively Disabled 3.1
Physically Disabled 47.8
Heart Attack ER Admissions 2.0
Mental Health Not Good 14.3
Chronic Kidney Disease 2.1
Obesity 8.0
Pedestrian Injuries 88.6
Physical Health Not Good 5.8
Stroke 0.9
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 98.2
Current Smoker 11.7
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 6.8
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 44.7
Children 4.0
Elderly 20.2
English Speaking 38.4
Foreign-born 38.0
Outdoor Workers 8.0
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 9.4
Traffic Density 6.4
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 27 / 28
Traffic Access 87.4
Other Indices —
Hardship 95.4
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 11.1

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 94.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 0.00 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Y es Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Y es Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use lot size and acreage provided by project description.

Construction: Construction Phases The existing structure would not be demolished.

Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project Class 32 Exemption Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 28 / 28
Operations: Vehicle Data Total daily trip = 868. No weekend trip rates since it is a school.

Characteristics: Project Details Project location is downtown Vallejo.

Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 1 / 28
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated

3.9. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details
Phase 1 Construction Only Output
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 2 / 28

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 3 / 28

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 4 / 28

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 5 / 28

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Construction Start Date 3/14/2024
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.60
Precipitation (days) 34.8
Location 255 Georgia St #241, Vallejo, CA 94590, USA
County Solano-San Francisco
City Vallejo
Air District Bay Area AQMD
Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area
TAZ 823
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.21

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq
ft)
Population Description
High School 18.0 1000sqft 0.70 18,000 1,452 1,452 — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 6 / 28

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.87 6.95 0.33 0.11 0.40 0.30 0.02 0.31 — 1,529 1,529 0.06 0.03 0.51 1,539 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 31.0 6.72 0.29 0.11 0.40 0.27 0.02 0.29 — 1,524 1,524 0.06 0.03 0.01 1,533 Average
Daily (Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.75 2.95 0.10 0.04 0.14 0.10 0.01 0.10 — 585 585 0.02 0.01 0.09 588 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.14 0.54 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 — 96.9 96.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 97.4

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.87 6.95 0.33 0.11 0.40 0.30 0.02 0.31 — 1,529 1,529 0.06 0.03 0.51 1,539 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 7 / 28
Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 31.0 6.72 0.29 0.11 0.40 0.27 0.02 0.29 — 1,524 1,524 0.06 0.03 0.01 1,533 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.75 2.95 0.10 0.04 0.14 0.10 0.01 0.10 — 585 585 0.02 0.01 0.09 588 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.14 0.54 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 — 96.9 96.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 97.4

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.73 5.83 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 864 864 0.04 0.01 — 867 Demolition — — — 0.02 0.02 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.73 5.83 0.29 — 0.29 0.27 — 0.27 — 864 864 0.04 0.01 — 867 Demolition — — — 0.02 0.02 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 8 / 28

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.48 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 71.0 71.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 71.3 Demolition — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.09 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.8 11.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.8 Demolition — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 91.3 91.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 92.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 23.9 23.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 25.1 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 84.4 84.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 85.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 23.9 23.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 25.1 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.02 7.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.12 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 9 / 28
Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.96 1.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.06 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.16 1.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.18 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.33 0.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.34

3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.85 6.94 0.33 — 0.33 0.30 — 0.30 — 903 903 0.04 0.01 — 906 Dust From
Material
Mo
vement
— — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.57 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 74.2 74.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 74.5 Dust From
Material
Mo
vement
— — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 10 / 28
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.10 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 12.3 12.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.3 Dust From
Material
Mo
vement
— — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 45.6 45.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 46.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.51 3.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.56 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.58 0.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.59 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 11 / 28
Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.65 6.58 0.19 — 0.19 0.17 — 0.17 — 1,380 1,380 0.06 0.01 — 1,385 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.65 6.58 0.19 — 0.19 0.17 — 0.17 — 1,380 1,380 0.06 0.01 — 1,385 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 1.80 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 378 378 0.02 < 0.005 — 379 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.33 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 62.6 62.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 62.8 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 69.0 69.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 70.1 Vendor < 0.005 0.11 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 80.1 80.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.21 83.9 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 12 / 28
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 63.8 63.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 64.6 Vendor < 0.005 0.11 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 80.1 80.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 83.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.7 17.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 17.9 Vendor < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 21.9 21.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 23.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.93 2.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.97 Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.63 3.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.80 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.35 2.88 0.16 — 0.16 0.14 — 0.14 — 447 447 0.02 < 0.005 — 448 Paving 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 13 / 28
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 6.12 6.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.14 Paving 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.01 1.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.02 Paving 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 105 105 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 107 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.46 1.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.48 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.24 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.25 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 14 / 28
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.91 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectur
al
Coatings

30.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.83 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.84 Architectur
al
Coatings

0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.30 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 15 / 28
Architectur
Coatings

0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.8 12.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 12.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 16 / 28
Vegetation ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 17 / 28
———————————————Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequester
ed
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequester
ed
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequester
ed
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 18 / 28
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 3/14/2024 4/24/2024 5.00 30.0 Material removal Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/25/2024 6/5/2024 5.00 30.0 Landscaping Building Construction Building Construction 6/6/2024 10/23/2024 5.00 100 Minor improvements Paving Paving 10/24/2024 10/30/2024 5.00 5.00 Paving for ramp Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/31/2024 11/6/2024 5.00 5.00 Parking stripes

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Off-Highway Trucks Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 84.0 0.37 Demolition Dumpers/Tenders Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 367 0.40 Demolition Dumpers/Tenders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Site Preparation Dumpers/Tenders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Trenchers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Building Construction Off-Highway Trucks Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Pressure Washers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel A verage 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Off-Highway Trucks Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 81.0 0.42 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 19 / 28
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 10.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 0.33 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 5.00 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 7.56 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 2.95 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 12.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 20 / 28
Architectural Coating Worker 1.51 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq
ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 27,000 0.00 6,300

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Ton of Debris)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.4 —
Site Preparation — — 0.00 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 2 61% 61%
Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 21 / 28

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
High School 0.00 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
2024 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year) — 1.00 — —
— -4.00 — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 22 / 28

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 13.9 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 5.10 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 10.1 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical
data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 2 0 0 N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 23 / 28
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 2 1 1 3
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 24 / 28
AQ-Ozone 13.6
AQ-PM 39.2
AQ-DPM 75.4
Drinking Water 24.0
Lead Risk Housing 78.3
Pesticides 32.3
Toxic Releases 63.4
Traffic 10.0
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 64.4
Groundwater 93.0
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 81.0
Impaired Water Bodies 51.2
Solid Waste 43.9
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 99.8
Cardio-vascular 91.6
Low Birth Weights 99.2
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 72.5
Housing 95.2
Linguistic 49.1
Poverty 97.4
Unemployment 99.1

Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 25 / 28
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 1.090722443
Employed 2.284101116
Median HI 0.128320287
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 26.30565892
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 16.65597331
Transportation —
Auto Access 0.397792891
Active commuting 89.25959194
Social —
2-parent households 0.641601437
Voting 31.59245477
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 23.58526883
Park access 81.35506224
Retail density 74.04080585
Supermarket access 16.64314128
Tree canopy 51.99538047
Housing —
Homeownership 3.849608623
Housing habitability 6.377518286
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 3.336327473 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 17.56704735
Uncrowded housing 51.79006801
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 26 / 28
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 49.23649429
Arthritis 1.4
Asthma ER Admissions 0.2
High Blood Pressure 1.5
Cancer (excluding skin) 22.7
Asthma 3.8
Coronary Heart Disease 1.7
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 1.1
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 30.6
Cognitively Disabled 3.1
Physically Disabled 47.8
Heart Attack ER Admissions 2.0
Mental Health Not Good 14.3
Chronic Kidney Disease 2.1
Obesity 8.0
Pedestrian Injuries 88.6
Physical Health Not Good 5.8
Stroke 0.9
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 98.2
Current Smoker 11.7
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 6.8
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 44.7
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 27 / 28
Children 4.0
Elderly 20.2
English Speaking 38.4
Foreign-born 38.0
Outdoor Workers 8.0
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 9.4
Traffic Density 6.4
Traffic Access 87.4
Other Indices —
Hardship 95.4
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 11.1

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Construction Detailed Report, 1/4/2024 28 / 28
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use project specific acreage provided.

Construction: Construction Phases no grading.

Construction: Off-Road Equipment The project is modifying existing structure and not constructing new facilities therefore defaults were revised
based on scope of project construction.

Construction: Architectural Coatings No exterior painting. The school would be required to provide 35 parking spaces (based on zoning code/table16.508-A
for DMX district). Standard parking space = 180 sq.ft. (35 x 180 = 6,300 sq.ft.) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 1 / 28
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated

3.3. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.7. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated

3.9. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details
Phase 2 Construction Only
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 2 / 28

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 3 / 28

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 4 / 28

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 5 / 28

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Construction Start Date 3/14/2025
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 3.60
Precipitation (days) 34.8
Location 241 Georgia St, Vallejo, CA 94590, USA
County Solano-San Francisco
City Vallejo
Air District Bay Area AQMD
Air Basin San Francisco Bay Area
TAZ 823
EDFZ 4
Electric Utility Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Gas Utility Pacific Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.21

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq
ft)
Population Description
High School 16.8 1000sqft 0.70 16,819 1,452 1,452 — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 6 / 28

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.84 6.79 0.31 0.29 0.55 0.28 0.06 0.29 — 1,518 1,518 0.06 0.04 0.81 1,528 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 29.4 6.41 0.25 0.29 0.55 0.23 0.06 0.29 — 1,514 1,514 0.06 0.04 0.02 1,522 Average
Daily (Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.71 2.84 0.09 0.05 0.14 0.09 0.01 0.10 — 596 596 0.02 0.01 0.09 600 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.13 0.52 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 — 98.7 98.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 99.3

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.84 6.79 0.31 0.29 0.55 0.28 0.06 0.29 — 1,518 1,518 0.06 0.04 0.81 1,528 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 7 / 28
Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 29.4 6.41 0.25 0.29 0.55 0.23 0.06 0.29 — 1,514 1,514 0.06 0.04 0.02 1,522 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.71 2.84 0.09 0.05 0.14 0.09 0.01 0.10 — 596 596 0.02 0.01 0.09 600 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.13 0.52 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 — 98.7 98.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 99.3

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.68 5.48 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 865 865 0.04 0.01 — 868 Demolition — — — 0.16 0.16 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.68 5.48 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 865 865 0.04 0.01 — 868 Demolition — — — 0.16 0.16 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 8 / 28

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.45 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 71.1 71.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 71.3 Demolition — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.08 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 11.8 11.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.8 Demolition — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 89.5 89.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.37 91.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.24 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 197 197 0.01 0.03 0.44 207 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 82.8 82.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 83.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.26 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 197 197 0.01 0.03 0.01 207 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.88 6.88 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.99 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 9 / 28
Hauling < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.2 16.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 17.0 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.14 1.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.16 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.68 2.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.82

3.3. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.82 6.77 0.31 — 0.31 0.28 — 0.28 — 904 904 0.04 0.01 — 907 Dust From
Material
Mo
vement
— — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.07 0.56 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 74.3 74.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 74.5 Dust From
Material
Mo
vement
— — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 10 / 28
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.10 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 12.3 12.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.3 Dust From
Material
Mo
vement
— — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 44.8 44.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 45.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.44 3.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.49 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.58 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 11 / 28
Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.61 6.29 0.16 — 0.16 0.15 — 0.15 — 1,381 1,381 0.06 0.01 — 1,386 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.61 6.29 0.16 — 0.16 0.15 — 0.15 — 1,381 1,381 0.06 0.01 — 1,386 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 1.72 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 378 378 0.02 < 0.005 — 380 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.31 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 62.7 62.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 62.9 Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 63.2 63.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.26 64.3 Vendor < 0.005 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 73.7 73.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.20 77.1 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 12 / 28
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 58.5 58.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 59.2 Vendor < 0.005 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 73.7 73.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 77.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.2 16.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 16.5 Vendor < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 21.1 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.68 2.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.72 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.34 3.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.49 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.31 2.54 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 423 423 0.02 < 0.005 — 425 Paving 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 13 / 28
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.80 5.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.82 Paving 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.96 0.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.96 Paving 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 103 103 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 105 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.43 1.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.46 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.24 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.24 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 14 / 28
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.88 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architectur
al
Coatings

29.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.30 Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 15 / 28
Architectur
Coatings

0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truc
k

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.7 11.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 11.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.16 0.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 16 / 28
Vegetation ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 17 / 28
———————————————Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequester
ed
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequester
ed
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequester
ed
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 18 / 28
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 3/14/2025 4/24/2025 5.00 30.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/25/2025 6/5/2025 5.00 30.0 — Building Construction Building Construction 6/6/2025 10/23/2025 5.00 100 — Paving Paving 10/24/2025 10/30/2025 5.00 5.00 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/31/2025 11/6/2025 5.00 5.00 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Off-Highway Trucks Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 84.0 0.37 Demolition Dumpers/Tenders Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 367 0.40 Demolition Dumpers/Tenders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Site Preparation Dumpers/Tenders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Trenchers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Building Construction Off-Highway Trucks Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Pressure Washers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Paving Off-Highway Trucks Diesel Average 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel A verage 4.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 19 / 28
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 10.0 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 2.80 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 5.00 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 7.06 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 2.76 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 12.5 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 20 / 28
Architectural Coating Worker 1.41 11.7 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 8.40 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Ton of Debris)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 333 —
Site Preparation — — 0.00 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
High School 0.00 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
2025 0.00 204 0.03 < 0.005

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year) Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 22 / 28

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 13.9 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 5.10 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 10.1 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical
data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 0 0 0 N/A
Sea Level Rise 0 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 0 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 23 / 28
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation 1 1 1 2
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure
.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 24 / 28
AQ-Ozone 13.6
AQ-PM 39.2
AQ-DPM 75.4
Drinking Water 24.0
Lead Risk Housing 78.3
Pesticides 32.3
Toxic Releases 63.4
Traffic 10.0
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 64.4
Groundwater 93.0
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 81.0
Impaired Water Bodies 51.2
Solid Waste 43.9
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 99.8
Cardio-vascular 91.6
Low Birth Weights 99.2
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 72.5
Housing 95.2
Linguistic 49.1
Poverty 97.4
Unemployment 99.1

Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 25 / 28
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 1.090722443
Employed 2.284101116
Median HI 0.128320287
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 26.30565892
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 16.65597331
Transportation —
Auto Access 0.397792891
Active commuting 89.25959194
Social —
2-parent households 0.641601437
Voting 31.59245477
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 23.58526883
Park access 81.35506224
Retail density 74.04080585
Supermarket access 16.64314128
Tree canopy 51.99538047
Housing —
Homeownership 3.849608623
Housing habitability 6.377518286
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 3.336327473 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 17.56704735
Uncrowded housing 51.79006801
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 26 / 28
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 49.23649429
Arthritis 1.4
Asthma ER Admissions 0.2
High Blood Pressure 1.5
Cancer (excluding skin) 22.7
Asthma 3.8
Coronary Heart Disease 1.7
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 1.1
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.9
Life Expectancy at Birth 30.6
Cognitively Disabled 3.1
Physically Disabled 47.8
Heart Attack ER Admissions 2.0
Mental Health Not Good 14.3
Chronic Kidney Disease 2.1
Obesity 8.0
Pedestrian Injuries 88.6
Physical Health Not Good 5.8
Stroke 0.9
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 98.2
Current Smoker 11.7
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 6.8
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 44.7
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 27 / 28
Children 4.0
Elderly 20.2
English Speaking 38.4
Foreign-born 38.0
Outdoor Workers 8.0
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 9.4
Traffic Density 6.4
Traffic Access 87.4
Other Indices —
Hardship 95.4
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 11.1

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Vallejo - Elite Charter School Project - Phase 2 Construction Detailed Report, 1/5/2024 28 / 28
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Characteristics: Project Details Phase 2 construction to start in 2025 Land Use project specific acreage provided.

Construction: Construction Phases no grading.

Construction: Off-Road Equipment The project is modifying existing structure and not constructing new facilities therefore defaults were revised
based on scope of project construction.

Construction: Architectural Coatings No exterior painting. The school would be required to provide 35 parking spaces (based on zoning code/table16.508-A
for DMX district). Standard parking space = 180 sq.ft. (35 x 180 = 6,300 sq.ft.) Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP1
220118 Author Checker
PROJECT DESCRIPTION :

THE PROPOSED PUBLIC CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL WILL PROVIDE
A VALUABLE HIGH SCHOOL IN THE DOWNTOWN VALLEJO AREA.

THE EXISTING BUILDING LOCATED AT 241-255 GEORGIA STREET WILL ACCOMMODATE A MAXIMUM OF 400 STUDENTS AND 35
STAFF. THE BUILDING IS A PARTIAL TWO-STORY BUILDING WITH A COMBINED TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 34,819 SQUARE
FEET.

THE TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WILL BE PHASED AS
FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE TO UPGRADE THE BUILDING. THE

FIRST PHASE PERMIT WILL INCLUDE THE FULL GROUND FLOOR

WITH TWO SUITES IDENTIFIED AS DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATES IF THE BIDS COME IN TOO HIGH. THE SECOND PHASE WILL INCLUDE

THE SECOND FLOOR AND ANY WORK THAT WAS NOT
COMPLETED ON THE FIRST FLOOR IN PHASE I.

THE PROGRAM FOR THE GROUND FLOOR INCLUDES 13

CLASSROOMS, A LIBRARY ALCOVE, MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM,
SERVING KITCHEN, 4 OFFICES, RESTROOMS, AND STORAGE
AREAS. THE SECOND FLOOR WILL ACCOMMODATE 5

ADDITIONAL CLASSROOMS, STORAGE, RESTROOMS, A
CONFERENCE ROOM AND 4 PRIVATE OFFICES.

THE MAIN VISITOR ENTRANCE WILL BE LOCATED ON GEORGIA

STREET AND THE STUDENT ENTRANCE WILL BE AT THE BACK OF
THE BUILDING AT LOT G. STUDENTS WILL ACCESS THE BUILDING

FROM AN ADA COMPLIANT RAMP OFF SACRAMENTO STREET
THAT WILL LEAD TO A GATED, FENCED WALKWAY. THE

SECOND FLOOR WILL HAVE ACCESS OFF THE WEST END OF

THE BUILDING WITH A NEW ELEVATOR AND COMPLIANT ENTRY
STAIRS.

PROJECT NUMBER:

APN: 0055-170-390
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: III-B
SEPARATION WALLS: AS APPLICABLE
OCCUPANCY GROUP: E OCCUPANCY
TABULATIONS:

TOTAL LOT AREA = 0.704 ACRE (PARCEL 1 @ 0.620 + PARCEL
2 @ 0.034 + PARCEL 3 @ 0.025 + PARCEL 4 @ 0.025)
GROSS BUILDING AREA: 34,819 S.F.
22,990 S.F. GROUND FLOOR
11,860 S.F. SECOND FLOOR.

PROJECT DATA:

ZONING: DMX (DOWNTOWN MIXED-USE)
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

REQUIRED EXISTING
FRONT SETBACK: 00 00
SIDE SETBACK: 00 00
REAR SETBACK: 00 00
BUILDING HEIGHT: 102 FT. 34 FT.

BICYCLE PARKING (VMC 16.508.12 & TABLE 16.508-D):

SCHOOLS - 2 SHORT-TERM SPACES PER CLASSROOM OR 6% OF
STUDENT CAPACITY PLUS STAFF.
18 CLASSROOMS * 2 = 36 BICYCLE SPACES

PROJECT TEAM

VICINITY MAP

SITE LOCATION
APPLICANT:

ELITE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
100 WHITNEY AVENUE
VALLEJO, CA 94589
(707) 652-3142
CONTACT: DR. RAMONA BISHOP
OWNER:

BRYAN BAYLES
51 RED CYPRESS CT
DANVILLE, CA 94506
ARCHITECT:

KINYON + KIM ARCHITECTS, INC.
1801 OAKLAND BLVD., SUITE 320
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596
(925) 934-1160
CONTACT: DAVID KIM, AIA
CIVIL:

ATLAS CIVIL DESIGN
872 HIGUERA STREET
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
(760) 718-8010
CONTACT: A.J. WHITAKER, PE
PROJECT MANAGEMENT:

JO ANN KOPLIN
[email protected]
(310) 717-4323

PROPOSED ELITE PUBLIC SCHOOLS - VALLEJO
241-255 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA

MAJOR USE PERMIT (PLANNING SUBMITTAL)

MUP SUBMITTAL SHEET INDEX
MUP1 MUP SUBMITTAL COVER SHEET
MUP2 FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
MUP3 SITE CONTEXT PHOTOS
MUP4 PRELIM SITE LAYOUT
MUP4.1 PRELIM DEMO SITE LAYOUT
MUP5 PHASE 1 PRELIM DEMO GROUND
FLOOR
MUP6 PHASE 1 PRELIM GROUND FLOOR
MUP7 PHASE 2 PRELIM GROUND FLOOR
MUP8 PHASE 2 PRELIM DEMO SECOND
FLOOR
MUP9 PHASE 2 PRELIM SECOND FLOOR
MUP10 PHASE 2 PRELIM ROOF PLAN
MUP11 PRELIM MASTER GROUND FLOOR
MUP12 PRELIM MASTER SECOND FLOOR
MUP13 PRELIM EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
1 of 6 TITLE SHEET
2 of 6 DEMOLITION AND SITE IMPROVEMENT

PLAN - A
3 of 6 DEMOLITION AND SITE IMPROVEMENT

PLAN - B
4 of 6 UTILITY PLAN
5 of 6 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN
6 of 6 DETAILS
L1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
TOTAL PARCEL AREA (PARCELS 1, 2 & 3): 30,666 S.F.

EXISTING & PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA: 1,425 S.F. (0.046 %)

EXHIBIT A
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP2
220118 Author Checker

EXHIBIT AFIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP3
220118 Author Checker

VIEW FROM GEORGIA STREET

NORTHEAST CORNER

VIEW FROM GEORGIA STREET

NORTHWEST CORNER

VIEW FROM SACRAMENTO STREET

SOUTHEAST CORNER

VIEW FROM SOUTH

NORTH VIEW OF GEORGIA STREET

WEST VIEW

EAST VIEW OF SACRAMENTO ST

WEST VIEW

EXHIBIT A

PROPOSED ELITE

HIGH SCHOOL

EXISTING GROSS
BUILDING AREA: 34,819 S.F.
22,959 S.F. GROUND FLOOR
11,860 S.F. SECOND FLOOR.
400 MAX. STUDENT CAPACITY

DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT G
SCHOOL

ENTRY/EXIT
SCHOOL
ENTRY
SCHOOL

ENTRY/EXIT
SCHOOL

ENTRY/EXIT
EXIT
ONLY
EXIT
ONLY
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3

EXISTING SIDEWALK

TO REMAIN EXISTING SIDEWALK

TO REMAIN

EXISTING SIDEWALK

TO REMAIN
PARCEL 4 EASEMENT

VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-530

VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-220

VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-170

EXISTING SIDEWALK

TO REMAIN

EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN
(N) PATHWAY

TO MEET ACCESSIBILITY

WROUGHT IRON

FENCING WITH GATES

OUTDOOR AREA OUTDOOR AREA
L
L
L
22' - 0"5' - 0"20' - 5"6' - 0 1/16"
4 BICYCLE SPACES
PER RACK. TOTAL OF
9 RACKS = 36 SPACES
BICYCLE RACKS, TYP. BICYCLE RACKS, TYP.
11' - 0"
8' - 0"
5' - 0"
6' - 0"18' - 0"5' - 0"18' - 6"

TRASH ROOM

ROLL UP DOOR

SACRAMENTO STREET

WROUGHT IRON

FENCING WITH GATES

GEORGIA STREET

WROUGHT IRON FENCING WITH GATES

LOADING AND UNLOADING STUDENTS
MONDAY - FRIDAY: 8:00 AM TO 9:00 AM (MORNING)
MONDAY - FRIDAY: 3:00 PM TO 4:00 PM (AFTERNOON)
WEDNESDAY: 1:00 PM TO 2:00 PM (EARLY DISMISSAL)

FOOD DELIVERY
MONDAY - FRIDAY: 8:00 AM TO 9:00 AM (MORNING)
MONDAY - FRIDAY: 11:00 AM TO 1:00 PM (AFTERNOON)

AT OTHER TIMES

QUEUE LANE - PARALLEL PARKING

ACCESSIBLE DROP OFF AREA
40' - 0"
9' - 0"

QUEUE LANE - PARALLEL PARKING AT OTHER TIMES

NO PARKING FOR LOADING & UNLOADING
9' - 0"

PROVIDE SIGNAGE

NO PARKING DURING

NON SCHOOL HOURS
PROVIDE SIGNAGE:

NO PARKING DURING

NON SCHOOL HOURS

VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-270

SOLTRANS
APN: 0055-170-540

GEORGIA ST GEORGIA ST

YORK ST

SACRAMENTO ST SACRAMENTO ST

MARIN ST
ELITE

PUBLIC HS

VIRGINA ST
ROUTE
ROUTE
LOT G2 - APN:
0055-170-530
SOLTRANS - APN:
0055-170-540
LOT K
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP4
220118 dek dek
1/16" = 1'-0"
PRELIM SITE LAYOUT 0' 16'8' 32 FEET4'
ELITE Public
Schools

EXHIBIT A

PARKING MAP

PROPOSED ELITE

HIGH SCHOOL

EXISTING GROSS
BUILDING AREA: 34,819 S.F.
22,959 S.F. GROUND FLOOR
11,860 S.F. SECOND FLOOR.
400 MAX. STUDENT CAPACITY

DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT G
SCHOOL

ENTRY/EXIT
SCHOOL
ENTRY
SCHOOL

ENTRY/EXIT
SCHOOL

ENTRY/EXIT
EXIT
ONLY
EXIT
ONLY
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3

EXISTING SIDEWALK

TO REMAIN EXISTING SIDEWALK

TO REMAIN

EXISTING SIDEWALK

TO REMAIN
PARCEL 4 EASEMENT

VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-530

VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-220

VALLEJO CITY
APN: 0055-170-170

EXISTING SIDEWALK

TO REMAIN

EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN
(N) PATHWAY

TO MEET ACCESSIBILITY

WROUGHT IRON

FENCING WITH GATES

OUTDOOR AREA OUTDOOR AREA
L
L
L
4 BICYCLE SPACES
PER RACK. TOTAL OF
9 RACKS = 36 SPACES
BICYCLE RACKS, TYP. BICYCLE RACKS, TYP.

TRASH ROOM

ROLL UP DOOR

SACRAMENTO STREET

WROUGHT IRON

FENCING WITH GATES

GEORGIA STREET

WROUGHT IRON FENCING WITH GATES

SOLTRANS
APN: 0055-170-540

DEMO LEGEND

DEMOLISHED WALL

EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN
(E) STOREFRONT / DOOR TO BE

REMOVED
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP4.1
220118 Author Checker
1/16" = 1'-0"

PRELIM DEMO SITE LAYOUT

EXHIBIT A
0' 16'8' 32 FEET4'
UP UP
UP

WALL LEGEND

DEMOLISHED WALL

EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN
(E) STOREFRONT / DOOR TO BE

REMOVED
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
RAMP
UP
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.

B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.

Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP5
220118 Author Checker
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
1/8" = 1'-0"
PHASE 1 EXISTING DEMO

PRELIM GROUND FLOOR
EXISTING FIXTURES TO BE REMOVED - PHASE 1
Type Count
HAND SINK 10
KITCHEN SINK 6
WALL HUNG URINAL 2
WATER CLOSET 14

EXHIBIT A
UP
DN
DN
DN
DN
UP
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H

GEORGIA STREET

SACRAMENTO STREET
(E) 7' - 2 1/2"
20 ATHLETIC
108 REGULAR
SUITE #101
56' - 0"
SUITE #104
35' - 8"
SUITE #103
31' - 7 1/2"
SUITE #105
39' - 2 1/2"

STUDENT
ENTRY

OUTDOOR EATING OUTDOOR EATING
RAMP

STUDENT
ENTRY
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
103 SF
MDF104
93 SF
ELECT.105
136 SF
WOMENS110
127 SF
MENS111
835 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #3103
1292 SF
HALLWAY100
651 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #2102
370 SF
LIBRARY106
718 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #4108
586 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #1101
1292 SF
HALLWAY100
312 SF
ADMIN109
101 SF
STORAGE113
69 SF
SHOWER #1204
70 SF
SHOWER #2206
123 SF
BOYS
RESTROOM205
124 SF
WOMENS207
321 SF
BOYS LOCKERS203
279 SF
GIRLS LOCKERS208
174 SF
MAIN ENTRY201
990 SF
PE SPACE #1202
191 SF
PE STORAGE211
172 SF
OFFICE #2302 104 SF
OFFICE #1301
149 SF
RECEPTION303
108 SF
OFFICE #3304
66 SF
RESTROOM305
738 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #6306
781 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #5307
247 SF
TRASH AREA308
419 SF
SERVERY402
203 SF
STORAGE403
66 SF
RESTROOM404
591 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #7501
584 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #8502
970 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #9503
596 SF
ART LAB506
180 SF
MENS505
SUITE #102
31' - 5 1/4"
38 SF
FIRE RISER407
1003 SF
HALLWAY500
3292 SF

CAFETERIA/
MPR401
115 SF
ELECT.405
320 SF
HALLWAY300
(PHASE 1)(PHASE 1)
75' - 11 1/4"
117' - 4 3/4"
695 SF
PE SPACE #2210
421 SF
HALLWAY209
20 ATHLETIC
72 REGULAR

ROLL UP DOOR

ACCESSIBLE LIFT

FOR SECOND
FLOOR
201 SF
WOMENS504
135 SF
STORAGE507
FUTURE

ELEVATOR
FUTURE

MACHINE
ROOM
597 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #3107 117 SF
STORAGE115
106 SF
STORAGE114
650 SF
HALLWAY309
(PHASE 1) (PHASE 1)
UP
117 SF
JANITOR112
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.

PHASE 1
PHASE 2
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP6
220118 Author Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"
PHASE 1 PRELIM FLOOR PLAN

EXHIBIT A

PHASE LEGEND
DN
DN
DN
DN
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
20 ATHLETIC
72 REGULAR
SUITE #101
56' - 0"
SUITE #102
31' - 5"
SUITE #104
35' - 8"
SUITE #103
31' - 7 1/2"
SUITE #105
39' - 2 1/2"

STUDENT
ENTRY

STUDENT
ENTRY
RAMP

RAMPRAMP
RAMP
RAMP
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
586 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #1101
651 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #2102
597 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #4107
370 SF
LIBRARY106
312 SF
ADMIN109
101 SF
STORAGE113
49 SF
MDI104
93 SF
ELECT.105
191 SF
PE STORAGE211
695 SF
PE SPACE #2210
321 SF
BOYS LOCKERS203
279 SF
GIRLS LOCKERS208
123 SF
MENS205
124 SF
WOMENS207
70 SF
SHOWER #2206
69 SF
SHOWER #1204
250 SF
TRASH AREA308
781 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #7307
738 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #6306
172 SF
OFFICE302 97 SF
OFFICE301
108 SF
OFFICE304
66 SF
RESTROOM305
149 SF
RECEPTION303
174 SF
MAIN ENTRY201
320 SF
HALLWAY300
3292 SF

CAFETERIA/
MPR401
419 SF
SERVERY402 203 SF
STOR.403
115 SF
GAS405
66 SF
RESTROOM404
596 SF
ART LAB506
201 SF
WOMENS504
970 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #10503
584 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #9502
591 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #8501
136 SF
WOMENS110
127 SF
MENS111
1003 SF
HALLWAY500
823 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #3103
(PHASE 2)
421 SF
HALLWAY209
990 SF
PE SPACE #1202
20 ATHLETIC
108 REGULAR

ACCESSIBLE LIFT

FOR SECOND
FLOOR
718 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #5108
117 SF
STORAGE115
106 SF
STORAGE114
180 SF
MENS505
75 SF
MECH. ROOM508
123 SF
ELEVATOR509
135 SF
STORAGE507
117 SF
JANITOR112
UP
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.

PHASE 1
PHASE 2
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP7
220118 IDA DEK
1/8" = 1'-0"
PHASE 2 PRELIM GROUND
FLOOR 0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'

EXHIBIT A

PHASE LEGEND
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
DN.

DN.

UP
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.

OPEN TO BELOW
DN.

B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.

WALL LEGEND

DEMOLISHED WALL

EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN
(E) STOREFRONT / DOOR TO BE

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP8
220118 Author Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"
PHASE 2 EXISTING DEMO
PRELIM SECOND FLOOR 0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
EXISTING FIXTURES TO BE REMOVED - PHASE 2
Type Count
HAND SINK 10
KITCHEN SINK 3
WALL HUNG URINAL 1
WATER CLOSET 12

EXHIBIT A
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
DN.

DN.

UP
ADA
LIFT
DN.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(PHASE 2)
(PHASE 2)
1093 SF
STORAGE602
702 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #12601
627 SF
STEM LAB #1612
597 SF
STEM LAB #2610
742 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #14604
77 SF
JANITOR620
79 SF
STORAGE613
104 SF
STORAGE611
586 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #16609
669 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #15608
1213 SF

OPEN ADMIN
SPACE619
855 SF

OPEN ADMIN
SPACE612
238 SF

TEACHERS
LOUNGE613
87 SF
RESTROOM614
92 SF
RESTROOM615 186 SF
OFFICE616
1176 SF

OPEN ADMIN
SPACE617
125 SF
OFFICE618
439 SF
HALLWAY614
608 SF
HALLWAY 2600
64 SF
ELEVATOR607

OPEN TO BELOW
110 SF
IT621
206 SF
WOMENS605
205 SF
MENS606(E) COL.
(E) COL.

DN.

B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP9
220118 Author Checker
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'

EXHIBIT A
1/8" = 1'-0"
PRELIM PHASE 2 SECOND
FLOOR

PHASE LEGEND
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
1/2" / 1'-0" 1/2" / 1'-0"
1/4" / 1'-0"
(E) COL.
(E) ROOF HATCH TO REMAIN
(E) ROOF HATCH TO REMAIN
AC-3
AC-10
AC-2
AC-11
EF-5
EF-1
AC-5
AC-12
AC-13
AC-8
AC-1
AC-4
AC-14
AC-15
AC-6AC-7 EF-3
EF-2
EF-4
AC-9
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4

ROOF LEGEND

EXISTING TO BE

REMOVED

EXISTING TO REMAIN

NEW UNITS TO BE

INSTALLED

EXISTING UNITS TO BE

REMOVED

NEW TO BE INSTALLED
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP10
220118 IDA DEK
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
1/8" = 1'-0"

PRELIM ROOF PLAN

EXHIBIT A
DN
DN
DN
DN
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H

STUDENT
ENTRY

STUDENT
ENTRY
SUITE #101
56' - 0"
SUITE #102
31' - 5"
SUITE #104
35' - 8"
SUITE #103
31' - 7 1/2"
SUITE #105
39' - 2 1/2"
20 ATHLETIC
108 REGULAR
20 ATHLETIC
72 REGULAR
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP
RAMP(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
36' - 4 1/4"51' - 0 1/4"21' - 0"
31' - 5 1/4"
6' - 11 3/4"
22' - 6"
93 SF
ELECT.105
586 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #1101
651 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #2102
370 SF
LIBRARY106
597 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #4107
312 SF
ADMIN109
136 SF
WOMENS110
127 SF
MENS111
117 SF
JANITOR112
990 SF
PE SPACE #1202
321 SF
BOYS LOCKERS203
279 SF
GIRLS LOCKERS208
123 SF
MENS205
124 SF
WOMENS207
69 SF
SHOWER #1204
70 SF
SHOWER #2206
191 SF
PE STORAGE211
738 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #6306
781 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #7307
250 SF
TRASH AREA308
108 SF
OFFICE304 66 SF
RESTROOM305
149 SF
RECEPTION303
172 SF
OFFICE302
97 SF
OFFICE301
419 SF
SERVERY402
203 SF
STOR.403
115 SF
GAS405
61 SF
RESTROOM404
3279 SF

CAFETERIA/
MPR401
996 SF
HALLWAY500
591 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #8501
584 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #9502
970 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #10503
38 SF
FIRE RISER407
75' - 11 1/4"
(PHASE 1)(PHASE 1)
36' - 1 1/4"
695 SF
PE SPACE #2210
421 SF
HALLWAY209
32' - 10"32' - 9 1/4"
24' - 10"29' - 10"12' - 10 13/16"
24' - 0 5/8"
26' - 4 5/16"
23' - 11 1/16"
19' - 11 1/16"
19' - 11 1/16"
21' - 9 7/8"

ROLL UP DOOR
49 SF
MDF104

TEACHING WALL

TEACHING WALL
201 SF
WOMENS504
180 SF
MENS505
120 SF
ELEVATOR509
50 SF
MECH. ROOM508
718 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #5108
117 SF
STORAGE113
106 SF
STORAGE114
823 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #3103

ACCESSIBLE LIFT

FOR SECOND
FLOOR
(PHASE 1) (PHASE 1)
(PHASE 2)
37' - 11 1/8"
23' - 1 3/8"
31' - 11 3/4"33' - 7 1/8"
596 SF
Room506 134 SF
STORAGE507
UP
UP
101 SF
STORAGE113
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP11
220118 Author Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"

PRELIM MASTER GROUND
FLOOR 0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
1 PLUMBING FIXTURES - GROUND FLOOR
TYPE
COUNT

EXISTING NEW
3 COMP SINK -

BI-LEVEL WATER FOUNTAIN & FILLING
SATION 1-
6FLOOR DRAIN -
14 HAND SINK10
1 HAND SINK HS-31-
SHOWER 2 -
32URINALS
WATER CLOSET 1314
-6KITCHEN SINK
1 DIFFERENCE
1 6
4 1
2 1
-1
-6

EXHIBIT A

PE PROGRAM SPACE
CAFETERIA 3,270 SF
PE SPACE #1 989 SF
PE SPACE #2 694 SF
BOYS LOCKERS 321 SF
SHOWERS #1 69 SF
MENS 123 SF
SHOWERS #2 70 SF
WOMENS 124 SF
GIRLS LOCKERS 278 SF
HALLWAY 420 SF
PE STORAGE 200 SF
LEARNING SPACE #1 712 SF
LEARNING SPACE #2 768 SF
LEARNING SPACE #3 908 SF
LEARNING SPACE #4 597 SF
LEARNING SPACE #5 717 SF
TOTAL 10,260 SF

PHASE LEGEND
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
A A
B B
C C
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
DN.

DN.

UP
ADA
LIFT
DN.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL. (E) COL. (E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
702 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #12601
1093 SF
STORAGE602
742 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #14604627 SF
STEM LAB #1612
595 SF
STEM LAB #2610
586 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #16609
669 SF

LEARNING
SPACE #15608
205 SF
MENS606
206 SF
WOMENS605
1213 SF

OPEN ADMIN
SPACE619
855 SF

OPEN ADMIN
SPACE612
238 SF

TEACHERS
LOUNGE613
87 SF
RESTROOM614
92 SF
RESTROOM615 186 SF
OFFICE616
125 SF
OFFICE618
1176 SF

OPEN ADMIN
SPACE617
(PHASE 2)
(PHASE 2)
64 SF
ELEVATOR607
608 SF
HALLWAY 2600
439 SF
HALLWAY614
77 SF
JANITOR620

OPEN TO BELOW
104 SF
STORAGE611
79 SF
STORAGE613
110 SF
IT621
B.8B.6
A.8 A.8
B.7
E.8 E.8
F.4 F.4
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.
(E) COL.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP12
220118 Author Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"

PRELIM MASTER SECOND
FLOOR 0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'

PLUMBING FIXTURES - SECOND FLOOR
TYPE
COUNT

EXISTING NEW
2FLOOR DRAIN -
6 HAND SINK10
11URINALS
WATER CLOSET 712
33KITCHEN SINK

DIFFERENCE
2 -4
-
-5
-

EXHIBIT A

PHASE LEGEND
SUITE 105 LEVEL
0'-0"
+100.00'
(E) 2ND FLR.
12' - 6"
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
± 33' - 9"
± 28' - 6"

NEW EXTERIOR LIGHT
FIXTURES, TYP.

KNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING KNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING KNOX BOX AT FENCEKNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING

A B C D E F G H
NEW EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES, TYP. KNOX BOX AT FENCEKNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING, TYP.

B.8A.8 B.7 E.8 F.4
SUITE 105 LEVEL
0'-0"
+100.00'
(E) 2ND FLR.
12' - 6"

ABCDEFGH
± 28' - 6"

NEW EXTERIOR LIGHT
FIXTURES, TYP.

KNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING
SUITE 105 LEVEL
0'-6"
+100.50'
B.6 A.8E.8F.4
(E) 2ND FLR.
12' - 6"
1234567891011
MUP13
5 NEW EXTERIOR LIGHT
FIXTURES, TYP.
4' - 5"
KNOX BOX AT FENCEKNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING, TYP. KNOX BOX AT FENCE KNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING KNOX BOX AT FENCE KNOX BOX AT (E)

BUILDING

KNOX BOX AT (E) BUILDING
SUITE 105 LEVEL
0'-6"
+100.50'
6 FOOT HIGH WROUGHT IRON PAINTED BLACK WITH 6

INCH TALL FINAL, WELDED TO PICKETS
VERTICAL PICKETS: 3/4" SQUARE, 16 GA. TUBING @

3.75 INCHES O.C.
3 HORIZONTAL RAILS: 1.5" x 1/8" THICK PUNCHED
CHANNEL. PICKETS, RAILS AND POSTS TO BE WELDED.

POSTS: 2" X 2" 14 GA. POSTS
6' - 0"

KEYED LOCKABLE LATCH SET
3 FEET WIDE GATE WHERE OCCURS AT NORTH SIDE
ONLY, SEE SITE PLAN. CLOSING HINGES WITH

LOCKABLE LATCH SET
Kinyon + Kim
Architects, Inc.
1801 Oakland Blvd., Suite 320
Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
925.934.1160
F: 925.934.8132
The information, plans, designs, notes and arrangements shown on this drawing are confidential and may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the expressed written permission of Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc. Drawings noted as Preliminary, Schematic and/or Conceptual contain information that is conceptual and subject to change. The architect makes no claim as to the accuracy of conceptual information or of information supplied by others.

Kinyon + Kim Architects, Inc., 2022c
Project #: Drawn by: Checked by:

Vallejo High School
Tenant Improvements
251 Georgia Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390
09/26/2023
MUP13
220118 Author Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"

PRELIM GEORGIA STREET

ELEVATION NORTH
1/8" = 1'-0"

PRELIM EAST ELEVATION
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
1/8" = 1'-0"

PRELIM WEST ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"

PRELIM SOUTH ELEVATION
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
0' 8'4' 16 FEET2'
3/8" = 1'-0"MUP13
5 FENCE ELEVATION

EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES

EXHIBIT A

GENERAL ACCESSIBILITY NOTESPROJECT INFORMATION

SHEET INDEX
CODE

ENGINEER'S NOTE
GEORGIA ST. VALLEJO

ADA IMPROVEMENT PLAN
241-255 GEORGIA STREET
CITY OF VALLEJO, CA 94590
APN: 0055-170-390

NOTE TO CONTRACTOR
LEGEND

OWNER/DEVELOPER

BRYAN BAYLES

ENGINEER
ATLAS CIVIL DESIGN, INC.

SITE ADDRESS

ARCHITECT
KINYON + KIM ARCHITECTS, INC.
335
PL
335
335
335
CL

BASIS OF BEARINGS

ABBREVIATIONS

TITLE SHEET

SCOPE OF WORK
www.AtlasCivilDesign.com
Civil Engineering Site Optimization
DesignCivilCivil Design Tel: 1-213-810-8470
San Diego Orange County Los Angeles San Luis Obispo Monterey

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBYREVISIONSDATE
SHEET
OF

GEORGIA STREET - SCHOOL ADA
241-255 GEORGIA STREET

CITY OF VALLEJO, COUNTY OF SOLANO
6 Underground Service Alert
of Southern California

CITY OF

VALLEJO

SOLANO AVE

GEORGIA ST

SACRAMENTO ST

FLORIDA ST

SONOMA BLVD
29 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE

VICINITY MAP
5TH ST

BENICIA RD

STEFFAN ST

LEMON ST

MAIN ST

YORK ST

CAPITOL ST

CURTOLA PKWY

MARIN ST ALAMEDA ST

MONTEREY ST

PROJECT SITE
780
80 NAPA RIVER

BENCHMARK INFORMATION
1 29 30
30 31
31 31
32 33
33 33
34 34
35 35
37 37
38 R⅊
⅊
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
A
P
R P
P
P
R
R
29 30
30 31
31 31
32 33
33 33
34 34
35 35
37 37
38 2
3 3
5 4
7 DEMOLITION NOTES

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
www.AtlasCivilDesign.com
Civil Engineering Site Optimization
DesignCivilCivil Design Tel: 1-213-810-8470
San Diego Orange County Los Angeles San Luis Obispo Monterey

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBYREVISIONSDATE
SHEET
OF

GEORGIA STREET - SCHOOL ADA
241-255 GEORGIA STREET

CITY OF VALLEJO, COUNTY OF SOLANO
6 Underground Service Alert
of Southern California

THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN HEREON HAVE

BEEN LOCATED FROM OBSERVED FIELD SURVEY

EVIDENCE AND EXISTING DRAWINGS, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: PLANS PROVIDED BY THE
CLIENT, UTILITY COMPANIES, AND MUNICIPAL AGENCIES.

THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEES THAT THE

UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH

UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR
ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT

WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN

ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE

DOES NOT CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS

ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION
AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY
LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.

UTILITY NOTE

DEMOLITION PLAN
AREA 1

DEMOLITION LEGEND
2 DEMOLITION & IMPROVEMENT PLAN - A

IMPROVEMENT PLAN
AREA 1
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1"= 10'
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1"= 10'
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 5 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 5

26 27
27 28
28 29
30 33
3129

GEORGIA STREET
(PUBLIC R.O.W.)

OH ELEC
26 27
27 28
28 29
30 33
3129

GEORGIA STREET
(PUBLIC R.O.W.)

OH ELEC
4 56
7 2
8 7

DEMOLITION NOTES

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
www.AtlasCivilDesign.com
Civil Engineering Site Optimization
DesignCivilCivil Design Tel: 1-213-810-8470
San Diego Orange County Los Angeles San Luis Obispo Monterey

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBYREVISIONSDATE
SHEET
OF

GEORGIA STREET - SCHOOL ADA
241-255 GEORGIA STREET

CITY OF VALLEJO, COUNTY OF SOLANO
6 Underground Service Alert
of Southern California

THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN HEREON HAVE

BEEN LOCATED FROM OBSERVED FIELD SURVEY

EVIDENCE AND EXISTING DRAWINGS, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: PLANS PROVIDED BY THE
CLIENT, UTILITY COMPANIES, AND MUNICIPAL AGENCIES.

THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEES THAT THE

UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH

UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR
ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT

WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN

ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE

DOES NOT CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS

ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION
AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY
LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.

UTILITY NOTE DEMOLITION PLAN
AREA 2
3 DEMOLITION & IMPROVEMENT PLAN - B

IMPROVEMENT PLAN
AREA 2
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1"= 10'
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1"= 10'

DEMOLITION LEGEND
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 5
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 5

5.18 OH ELEC

GEORGIA STREET
(PUBLIC R.O.W.)

SACRAMENTO STREET
(PUBLIC R.O.W.)

WATER CONSTRUCTION NOTES SEWER CONSTRUCTION NOTES FIRE CONSTRUCTION NOTES www.AtlasCivilDesign.com
Civil Engineering Site Optimization
DesignCivilCivil Design Tel: 1-213-810-8470
San Diego Orange County Los Angeles San Luis Obispo Monterey

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBYREVISIONSDATE
SHEET
OF

GEORGIA STREET - SCHOOL ADA
241-255 GEORGIA STREET

CITY OF VALLEJO, COUNTY OF SOLANO
6 Underground Service Alert
of Southern California
4 UTILITY PLAN

DEMOLITION NOTES

OFF-SITE CONSTRUCTION NOTES
33 34
34 35
36 36
36 37
3738
STOP

OH ELEC
P
P P P
P
R R
R R
R
R
R
P
A
PS S
S
S
SS
R
R
33 34
34 35
36 36
36 37
3738
STOP

OH ELEC
1 SACRAMENTO STREET
(PUBLIC R.O.W.)
1 2
3 3
4 4
4 5
6 6 6
6 6 6 6 6 6
2 7
www.AtlasCivilDesign.com
Civil Engineering Site Optimization
DesignCivilCivil Design Tel: 1-213-810-8470
San Diego Orange County Los Angeles San Luis Obispo Monterey

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBYREVISIONSDATE
SHEET
OF

GEORGIA STREET - SCHOOL ADA
241-255 GEORGIA STREET

CITY OF VALLEJO, COUNTY OF SOLANO
6 Underground Service Alert
of Southern California

UTILITY NOTE

DEMOLITION PLAN DEMOLITION LEGEND
5 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANIMPROVEMENT PLAN
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1"= 10'
0 10' 20' 30'
SCALE: 1"= 10'
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 3
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 2 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 3

DETAILS
www.AtlasCivilDesign.com
Civil Engineering Site Optimization
DesignCivilCivil Design Tel: 1-213-810-8470
San Diego Orange County Los Angeles San Luis Obispo Monterey

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBYREVISIONSDATE
SHEET
OF

GEORGIA STREET - SCHOOL ADA
241-255 GEORGIA STREET

CITY OF VALLEJO, COUNTY OF SOLANO
66 Memo
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.444.7301

Date: February 21, 2024
To: Christina Ratcliffe, Planning and Development Services Director, City of Vallejo CC: Erwin Ordonez, Interwest
From: Dimitri Antoniou, Pat Angell, Ascent
Subject: Noise and Vibration Study- Elite Charter School Project in Vallejo, CA Class 32 Exemption

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Class 32 is a Categorical Exemption under the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Cal.

Code Regs., Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.) that is available for qualifying infill development located in an urban area.

To qualify for a Class 32 Exemption, one criterion a project must meet is that approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to noise. The proposed project is characterized as an infill development project and is located in the City of Vallejo on a 0.74-acre site, surrounded by commercial uses.

The purpose of this Noise Study is to evaluate whether the project would have a significant effect related to noise.

This study includes a brief explanation of the project, applicable standards of significance, analysis of noise and vibration impacts, and conclusions. No airports or airstrips are located within a close proximity (i.e., within 2 miles) to the project site; thus, noise from airports is not discussed further.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project site is located at 241-255 Georgia Street on Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 0055-170-390 in Vallejo, CA.

The project site is bounded by an existing commercial development to the west, Georgia Street to the north, Sacramento Street to the east, and an existing parking lot and Vallejo Transit Center to the south. The project site includes approximately 30,666 square feet of parcel area and is currently occupied by a partial two-story building with a combined total square footage of 34,819 square feet. The building is currently partially occupied by a medical clinic.

The initial development phase proposes developing approximately 18,000 square feet of interior space suitable for 13 classrooms, four offices, bathroom facilities, a serving kitchen, a multi-purpose room, a library alcove, and a future gymnasium on the ground floor. The second development phase proposes to develop five additional classrooms, storage areas, restrooms, a conference room, and four private offices on the second floor. The proposed project improvements would be Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible and would comply with State design and Final Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project February 21, 2024

Page 2 ends

construction standards. Other project improvements include adding school signage, developing perimeter fencing for security purposes, constructing curbs, ramps, and gutters; trenching along Georgia Street for underground utilities; removing/reconfiguring existing curbs to accommodate new parking; minor removal of shrubs and trees; adding a new ADA accessible ramp that would connect Sacramento Street to the rear entrance of the building; reconfiguring 16 parking spaces into eight parallel parking spaces along Sacramento Street, as well as adding 36 bicycle parking spaces. New perimeter fencing for security purposes, school signage, and 36 bicycle parking spaces would be included.

NOISE FUNDAMENTALS
Sound can be described as the mechanical energy of a vibrating object transmitted by pressure waves through a liquid or gaseous medium (e.g., air) to a human ear. Noise is defined as loud, unexpected, or annoying sound. In the science of acoustics, the fundamental model consists of a sound (or noise) source, a receiver, and the propagation path between the two. The loudness of the noise source and obstructions or atmospheric factors affecting the propagation path to the receiver determine the sound level and characteristics of the noise perceived by the receiver.

The field of acoustics deals primarily with the propagation and control of sound.

The amplitude of pressure waves generated by a sound source determines the loudness of that source. Sound pressure amplitude is measured in micro-Pascals (mPa). One mPa is approximately one hundred billionth (0.00000000001) of normal atmospheric pressure. Sound pressure amplitudes for different kinds of noise environments can range from less than 100 to 100,000,000 mPa. Because of this large range of values, sound is rarely expressed in terms of mPa. Instead, a logarithmic scale is used to describe sound pressure level (SPL) in terms of decibels (dB).

Because decibels are logarithmic units, SPLs cannot be added or subtracted through ordinary arithmetic. Under the decibel scale, a doubling of sound energy corresponds to a 3-dB increase. In other words, when two identical sources are each producing sound of the same loudness, the resulting sound level at a given distance would be 3 dB higher than if only one of the sound sources were producing sound under the same conditions. For example, if one idling truck generates an SPL of 70 dB, two trucks idling simultaneously would not produce 140 dB; rather, they would combine to produce 73 dB. Under the decibel scale, three sources of equal loudness together produce a sound level 5 dB louder than one source.

The decibel scale alone does not adequately characterize how humans perceive noise. The dominant frequencies of a sound have a substantial effect on the human response to that sound. Although the intensity (energy per unit area) of the sound is a purely physical quantity, the loudness or human response is determined by the characteristics of the human ear. Human hearing is limited in the range of audible frequencies as well as in the way it perceives the SPL in that range. In general, people are most sensitive to the frequency range of 1,000-8,000 Hz and perceive sounds within this range better than sounds of the same amplitude with frequencies outside of this range. To approximate the response of the human ear, sound levels of the individual frequency bands are weighted, depending on the human sensitivity to those frequencies. Then, an “A-weighted” sound level (expressed in units of A-weighted decibels) can be computed based on this information. The A-weighting dB (dBA) scale approximates the frequency response of the average young ear when listening to most ordinary sounds. When people make judgments of the relative loudness or annoyance of a sound, their judgment correlates well with the A-scale sound levels of those sounds.

Thus, noise levels are typically reported in terms of A weighted decibels. All sound levels discussed in this study are expressed in A-weighted decibels.

Final Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project February 21, 2024

Page 3 ends

Common Noise Descriptors
Various time-averaging noise metrics are used in the field of acoustics, which can be chosen to better characterize the noise source in question and how people perceive it. The following definitions are applicable to the understanding of this analysis and the City of Vallejo’s noise standards.  Equivalent Continuous Sound Level (Leq): Leq represents an average of the sound energy occurring over a specified period. In effect, Leq is the steady-state sound level containing the same acoustical energy as the time- varying sound that actually occurs during the same period.  Maximum Noise Level (Lmax): the highest time-weighted sound level measured during a measurement period.  Minimum Noise Level (Lmin): The lowest time-weighted sound level measured during a measurement period.  Day-Night Noise Level (Ldn): the average A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour period with a 10-dB penalty applied during the sensitive nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.  Percentile-Exceeded Sound Level (Lx): Lx represents the sound level exceeded for a given percentage of a specified period (e.g., L10 is the sound level exceeded 10 percent of the time, and L90 is the sound level exceeded 90 percent of the time). Th City of Vallejo Municipal Code uses an L50 metric, explained in “Applicable Noise Standards.” Existing Noise Sensitive Land Uses
Noise-sensitive land uses are generally considered to include uses where noise exposure could result in health- related risks to individuals, as well as places where quiet is an essential element of their intended purpose, such as schools, libraries, and residences. Residential uses are of primary concern because of the potential for increased and prolonged exposure of individuals to both interior and exterior noise levels, and because these land uses are places of rest and sleep for City residents. The project site is located along Georgia Street, just west of the intersection with Sacramento Street. The nearest sensitive receiver to the project site is the Vallejo John F. Kennedy Library, located approximately 0.08 miles northwest of the project site, north of Georgia Street. There are multi-family residential dwellings along Maine Street, approximately 0.10 miles south of the project site.

Existing Noise Sources and Ambient Levels
The sound levels in most communities fluctuate, depending on the activity of nearby and distant noise sources, time of the day, or season of the year, with major roads and highways typically the primary sources of ambient noise in a community. Local roads closest to the project site include Georgia Street and Sacramento Street. The nearest major roadway to the project site is State Route (SR) 29, located approximately 0.18 miles east of the project site. The area surrounding the project site can be characterized as urbanized and developed, and includes commercial uses such as restaurants, banks, and the Vallejo Transit Center. Primary noise sources include roadway traffic noise (e.g., engine noise, car radios) and noise associated with the Greyhound Bus Station / Vallejo Transit Center (e.g., busses idling, people talking) on the south side of the project site.

To establish existing noise levels, an ambient noise survey was conducted on January 4 th and January 5th, 2024. One
long-term (LT) (24-hour) and three short-term (ST) (15-minute) measurements were conducted using a Piccolo II integrating sound level meter. The meter was calibrated before use with a Hangzhou Aihua Class 2 acoustical calibrator to ensure measurement accuracy. The measurement equipment meets all pertinent specifications of the American National Standards Institute. Meteorological conditions during the measurement period were adequate for reliable noise measurements, with clear skies, temperatures ranging from 43 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) to 57°F, and maximum windspeed of 7 miles per hour (mph), and no precipitation.

In accordance with Section 16.502.09.E of the City Code, the noise meter was located 5 feet above the ground and in no case was it within 10 feet of nearby walls or other structures that could affect noise measurements. On-site measurements were conducted for the purpose of established existing ambient noise levels for use in the noise compatibility assessment below. Noise levels are summarized below in Table 1 with corresponding labels indicating Final Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project February 21, 2024

Page 4 ends

the locations of the measurements on Figure 1. A detailed summary of raw measurement data and photographs of meter location are included in Attachment A.

Table 1 Summary of Existing Ambient Noise Level Survey
Short-Term Measurements (15-minute)
Noise Measurement
Locations1 Date Start/Stop Time Leq dBA Lmax dBA Lmin dBA ST 1 1/4/2024 9:02 am/9:17 am 56.3 66.3 42.3
ST 2 1/4/2024 8:45 am/9:00 am 55.5 70.1 45.1
ST 3 1/4/2024 9:18 am/9:33 am 59.7 78.8 48.1
Long-Term Measurement (24-hour)
Date Start/Stop Time. CNEL dBA
LT 1 1/4/2024-1/5-
2024
10:00 a.m. / 10:00 a.m. 66.0
Notes: ST = short-term; LT = long-term; Leq = average hour noise level; Lmax = maximum instantaneous noise level; Lmin = minimum instantaneous noise level; dBA = A-weighted decibel; CNEL = community equivalent noise level.

Noise measurement locations correspond to labels on Figure 1.

Source: Field data collected by Ascent Environmental, Inc., 2024.

APPLICABLE NOISE STANDARDS
Federal
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) developed the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, which provides guidance to engineers, planners, and consultants in assessing vibration from construction, operation, and maintenance of projects. To address the human response to ground vibration, the FTA has set forth guidelines for maximum-acceptable vibration criteria for different types of land uses. These guidelines are presented below in Table 2. In addition, FTA has also established construction vibration damage criteria, shown below in Table 3. Where local agencies have not adopted vibration criteria, as is the case in Vallejo, these criteria apply.

Table 2 Ground-Borne Vibration Impact Criteria for General Assessment for Human Response Land Use Category Ground-Borne Vibration Impact
Levels for Human Response
Ground-Borne Vibration Impact
Levels for Human Response
Ground-Borne Vibration Impact
Levels for Human Response
Frequent Events1 Occasional Events2 Infrequent Events3
Category 1: Buildings where vibration
would interfere with interior
operations.
654 654 654
Category 2: Residences and buildings
where people normally sleep.
72 75 80
Category 3: Institutional land uses
with primarily daytime uses.
75 78 83
Notes: VdB re 1 microinch/second = vibration decibels referenced to 1 microinch/second and based on the root mean square (RMS) velocity amplitude. 1 “Frequent Events” is defined as more than 70 vibration events of the same source per day. 2 “Occasional Events” is defined as between 30 and 70 vibration events of the same source per day. 3 “Infrequent Events” is defined as fewer than 30 vibration events of the same source per day.

Final Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project February 21, 2024

Page 5 ends

4 This criterion is based on levels that are acceptable for most moderately sensitive equipment such as optical microscopes. Vibration-sensitive manufacturing or research would require detailed evaluation to define acceptable vibration levels.

Source: FTA 2018: 123–126.

Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project January 22, 2024

Page 6 ends

Sources: adapted by Ascent in 2023.

Figure 1 Noise Measurement Locations

Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project January 22, 2024

Page 7 ends

Table 3 FTA Construction Damage Vibration Criteria
Land Use Category PPV, in/sec
Reinforced-concrete, steel or timber (no plaster) 0.5
Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.3
Non-engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.2
Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12 Source: FTA 2018.

Local
City of Vallejo General Plan
Table NBE-1 of the Vallejo General Plan (presented as Table 4 in this analysis) establishes guidelines for noise exposure to new development, based on the specific land use. New schools are subject to existing noise exposure levels of up to 70 dBA Ldn (City of Vallejo 2017: 4-37).

Table 4 California Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments Land Use Type Normally Acceptable1 Conditionally Acceptable2 Normally Unacceptable3 Unacceptable4 Residential – Low density
Single-Family, Duplex,
Mobile Homes
Less than 60 Ldn 55-70 Ldn 70-75 Ldn 75+ Ldn
Residential – Multiple
Family
Less than 65 Ldn 60-70 Ldn 70-75 Ldn 75+ Ldn
Transient Lodging,
Motels, Hotels
Less than 65 Ldn 60-70 Ldn 70-80 Ldn 80+ Ldn
Schools, Libraries,
Churches, Hospitals,
Nursing Homes
Less than 70 Ldn 60-70 Ldn 70-80 Ldn 80+ Ldn
Office Buildings,
Businesses, Commercial,
and Professional
Less than 75 Ldn 70-75 Ldn 75+ Ldn N/A
Notes: Ldn = day-night level; dBA = A-weighted decibels Source: Governor’s Office of Planning and Research 2003 as cited in City of Vallejo 2017: Table NBE-1. 1 Specified land use is satisfactory based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction, without any special noise insulation requirements.
2 New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and the needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice.
3 New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. 4 New construction or development generally should not be undertaken.

City of Vallejo Municipal Code
Section 16.502.03 Construction Management
The project site is in the City of Vallejo; therefore, the City’s local policies pertaining to noise are applicable to the project. City Code Section 16.502.03.C requires that all construction and transport equipment be muffled in accordance with State and federal laws. Section 16.502.03(E) mandates that grading and pile driving operations within Administrative Draft Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project January 22, 2024

Page 8 ends

¼ mile of residential units be limited to the hours between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays to ensure compliance with the requirements for construction activity.

Section 16.502.09 Noise
Section 16.502.09 of the City Code provides maximum allowable noise standards for various land uses, which are the basis for this noise assessment. Per Section 16.502.09.C.2, the requirements impose limits on regularly occurring noise for the specified time periods, averaged over an hour. Table 16.502-C of the City Code (presented as Table 5 in this study) establishes daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) noise standards applicable to various land uses, applicable on the subject property line, as well as noise limits at receiving residential zone boundaries. Maximum exterior noise levels are summarized below in Table 5.

Table 5 City of Vallejo Maximum Noise Levels by Noise Zone Noise Zoning Districts
Maximum Noise Level in
dBA (level not to be
exceeded more than 30
minutes in any hour)
Maximum Noise Level in dBA
(level not to be exceeded more
than 30 minutes in any hour)
Maximum Noise Level in dBA
(level not to be exceeded more
than 50 minutes in any hour)
Measured at property line or
district boundary
Measured at any boundary of a
residential zone
Between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00
a.m., measured at any boundary
of a residential zone
Single-unit Residential 60 60 -
Multiple-unit Residential 65 65 -
Commercial and Mixed-Use, Medical,
Office
70 60 50 or ambient noise level
Light Industrial 75 65 50 or ambient noise level
General Industrial 75 65 50 or ambient noise level
Public Facilities and Community Use 65 60 50 or ambient noise level Open Space and Recreational Districts 65 60 50 or ambient noise level Source: City of Vallejo 2023.

Section 16.502.09.C.3 establishes that the standard limits in Table 16.502-C (presented as Table 5 in this study) shall be adjusted by 5 decibels for any noise that contains a steady, pure tone such as a whine, screech or hum, or an impulsive sound such as hammering or riveting, or contains music or speech, as described in Table 16.502-D (presented as Table 6 in this study).

Table 6 Time and Adjustments to City Noise Standards
Time and Type of Noise Adjustment (Decibels)
Any type other than construction and related activities between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.
+5
Noise of unusual impulsive character (e.g., hammering or drilling) -5 Noise of unusual periodic character (e.g., hammering or screeching) -5 Source: City of Vallejo 2023.

Section 16.502.09.D.1 establishes specific hours and noise standards for construction in residential zoning districts and any mixed-use district. Specifically, construction, demolition, and related loading/unloading activities that may generate noise exceeding levels in Table 16.502.E (presented as Table 7 in this study) shall be limited to hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. in residential zoning districts and in any mixed-use district.

Administrative Draft Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project January 22, 2024

Page 9 ends

Table 7 Maximum Noise Level for Temporary Construction Activity RR, RLD RMD, RHD, NMX, NC Commercial (including medical and office) and Industrial
Mobile construction equipment – non-scheduled, intermittent, and short-term for less than 15 days Weekdays 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 75 dBA 80 dBA 85 dBA
Saturdays 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA
Sundays and legal holidays None None None
Stationary construction equipment
Weekdays 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA
Saturdays 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA
Sundays and legal holidays None None None
Notes: RR = Rural Residential; RLD = Residential Low Density; RMD = Residential Medium Density; RHD = Residential High Density; NMX = Neighborhood Mixed Use; NC = Neighborhood Commercial
Source: City of Vallejo 2023.

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNFIICANCE
Based on the CEQA Appendix G Checklist and adopted City of Vallejo noise standards, the project would result in a significant impact to noise if it would result in:
 Short-term construction noise levels that exceed 65 dBA Leq at Residential Medium Density, Residential High Density, Neighborhood Mixed Use, Neighborhood Commercial land uses during the daytime hours (i.e., 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturdays);  Short-term vibration levels that result in disturbance to sensitive uses or the potential to cause structural damage to structures;
 Operational stationary noise levels that exceed 65 dBA Leq at residential uses; or  Operational mobile noise sources that result in a substantial (i.e., 5 dBA) increase in noise.

ANALYSIS
Potential to Result in Substantial Temporary (Construction) Noise Short-term construction noise levels would fluctuate depending on the type, number, and duration of usage of varying equipment. Additionally, the effects of construction noise largely depend on the type of construction activities being performed; noise levels generated by those activities; distances to noise-sensitive receptors; the relative locations of noise attenuating features such as topography and existing structures; and existing ambient noise levels.

The proposed project would not require the demolition of the existing building. The project would include internal improvements to reconfigure the space for classrooms, administrative offices, and other education-related amenities.

Both phases of development would include various onsite improvements and upgrades to the existing buildings, including the installation of wrought iron fencing; removal of shrubs and trees; construction of curbs, ramps, and gutters; trenching for underground utilities; removal/reconfiguration of existing paved areas (e.g., curb and sidewalk portions) to accommodate reconfigured street parking; and construction of a new accessible ramp that would connect Sacramento Street to the rear entrance of the building. Construction equipment associated with these activities could include dump trucks, concrete mixers, pickup trucks, chainsaws, and concrete saws. Based on reference noise levels for typical construction equipment, the demolition/removal of existing concrete using concrete Administrative Draft Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project January 22, 2024

Page 10 ends

saws would represent the loudest phases of construction. Thus, the noise assessment is based on this phase as all subsequent phases and associated noise levels would be lower than this activity.

As shown above in Table 7, the City of Vallejo identifies one set of standards for mobile construction equipment and one set of standards for stationary equipment. Both mobile (e.g., dump trucks and pickup trucks) and stationary equipment (e.g., concrete saws) could be used in project construction. The project site is located within a mixed-use zoning area, and thus, although downtown mixed-use is not specifically included in Table 7, the standards that apply for other mixed-use areas included in the table (i.e., neighborhood mixed use) are used in this analysis (i.e., 65 dBA) and are applied as hourly averages (i.e., L
eq).

Modeling identified that the operation of a concrete saw would result in noise levels of 83.0 dBA Leq at 50 feet. See Attachment A for modeling inputs and results. Such activity would reduce to the City’s construction noise standard of 65 dBA Leq for mixed-use areas at 398 feet. There are no sensitive receptors located within this distance. The sensitive receptor nearest to Georgia Street, where this modeling scenario would occur, is the Vallejo John F. Kennedy Library located approximately 400 feet northwest of the project site. At this distance, noise levels would attenuate to 64.9 dBA Leq, and therefore would not exceed applicable City standards. The nearest residential receptors are located approximately 494 feet south of the project site. At this distance, noise levels from the use of a concrete saw would attenuate to 63.1 dBA Leq, and therefore would not exceed applicable City standards.

Based on the modeling conducted for the worst-case construction phase, project construction noise would not conflict with City standards. Further, construction activity and resulting noise would be temporary in nature, with an anticipated 8-month duration for each phase of the project and would end once construction is complete. During this time, construction activities would occur between 7:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., as no nighttime construction work is proposed. For these reasons, the noisiest construction equipment would not generate significant levels of noise that exceed adopted noise standards and would not substantially affect nearby receptors.

Potential Construction Vibration
Project construction would not involve the use of ground vibration-intensive activities, such as pile driving or blasting.

The pieces of construction equipment that would be used during project construction, such as concrete saws and light trucks, generate little to no ground vibration and are not considered impact devices (FHWA 2006). Construction activity would be intermittent and temporary and is estimated to take approximately eight months for each phase.

Specifically, construction activities associated with the project would occur during daytime hours (i.e., between 7:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.). Therefore, any vibration activity that would result from project construction would not occur during evening or nighttime hours, thereby reducing potential vibration impacts (i.e., annoyance) to nearby receptors during more sensitive hours of the day. Additionally, the project would not involve the development of any major sources of ground vibration such as commercial railways or passenger rail transit lines. Therefore, the project would not result in long-term operational activities associated with permanent or substantial levels of ground vibration. For these reasons, construction and operational generated vibration would not result in the potential for structural damage or human annoyance.

Operational Stationary Noise
Mechanical Equipment Noise
The project would include mechanical building equipment as part of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems at the project site. HVAC equipment is a common noise source associated with land use development and is currently used on the project site. Specifically, there are currently 20 air conditioning units and three mechanical fans on the building rooftop. Therefore, noise associated with the mechanical equipment would not represent a new noise source in the area. Implementation of the project would result in the removal of 20 air conditioning units and three mechanical fans, as well as the installation of 14 new air conditioning units and five new mechanical fans. Therefore, the project would include fewer pieces of mechanical equipment than previously located Administrative Draft Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project January 22, 2024

Page 11 ends

on the site. Further, as the school would generally operate during the daytime hours (i.e., between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.), noise associated with building equipment would not result in substantial increases during sensitive times of the day. For these reasons, building equipment noise would not result in adverse effects to nearby sensitive receptors.

Outdoor Common Areas
The project would include the addition of outdoor common areas along Georgia Street that would be in use during daytime school hours. The addition of the outdoor patio could result in an increase in localized noise on the project site associated with people talking, congregating, and eating outdoors. Noise associated with people talking and eating would not be unique, dissimilar, or louder than existing ambient noise levels associated with urban environments (e.g., roadway traffic, people talking, landscape equipment). Additionally, the outdoor areas would be in use for short periods of time during daytime hours (i.e., weekdays between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.) and would not be operational during nighttime hours and would not emit nighttime noise. For these reasons, noise from outdoor common areas would not result in adverse effects to nearby sensitive receptors.

Loading and Unloading
The operation of the new school would require daily delivery of food for students. Food delivery would take place Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. As shown in the site plans, the deliveries would take place in the designated loading/unloading area along Sacramento Street, on the eastern frontage of the project site. Noise sources from truck activity associated with delivery areas are usually short-term and can include activities such as vehicle idling, engine revving, and the release of air brakes on heavy trucks. Based on a noise measurement conducted by Ascent on April 20, 2023, at the loading and unloading dock at an Anheuser Bush facility, noise from truck activity can be as loud as 59 dBA L eq at 100 feet (Ascent 2023). The off-site residential
receptor closest to the on-site delivery area are the multi-family residences located along Maine Street, approximately 494 feet south of the project site. Delivery truck-generated noise would be 45.1 dBA Leq at 494 feet.

Therefore, delivery truck noise would not exceed the City’s daytime noise standards of 65 dBA Leq.

Summary
Project operation would result in new stationary noise sources such as noise associated with HVAC equipment, outdoor common areas, and food delivery activity. Noise levels from new and existing noise sources would not exceed applicable daytime exterior noise standards established by the City. Further, as described in detail above, none of these sources would operate during the nighttime because the school would be closed by 3:00 p.m. daily, with limited after-school, evening, or weekend activities. Thus, project-generated noise would not result in any exceedance of nighttime noise standards.

Operational Mobile Source Noise
Vehicle trips associated with the project would include trips generated by employees and students. These trips would result in an increase in average daily traffic volumes and associated increase in traffic noise levels along roadway segments that would be used to travel to and from the project site. To analyze the impact of project-generated operational transportation noise sources, traffic noise levels under existing and existing-plus-project conditions were modeled for affected roadway segments. Refer to Attachment A for detailed noise modeling input parameters.

Due to the logarithmic properties of noise, a 3 dB increase in noise is characterized as barely perceptible, a 5 dB increase as distinctly perceptible, and a 10 dB increase as a doubling of the noise level. Further, it requires a doubling of the noise source to result in an audible (i.e., 3 dB) increase. Thus, a perceptible increase in noise (i.e., 5 dB), would be considered a substantial increase in noise. It should be noted that potential trip reductions from the student survey were not accounted for in this analysis, resulting in a conservative roadway analysis. Table 8 shows the existing and existing plus project noise levels of the roadway segments nearest to the project site.

Administrative Draft Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project January 22, 2024

Page 12 ends

Table 8 Existing and Existing Plus Project Traffic Noise Levels Street Name From To
Existing Conditions Existing + Project Noise Increase
dBA (Ldn)
Sonoma Boulevard Florida Street Georgia Street 55.8 56.3 0.6 Sonoma Boulevard Georgia Street Curtola Parkway 59.1 59.2 0.1 Georgia Street Mare Island Way Santa Clara Street 51.4 52.5 1.1 Georgia Street Santa Clara Street Sacramento Street 49.6 50.9 1.2 Georgia Street Sacramento Street Sonoma Boulevard 52.2 52.9 0.7 Curtola
Parkway/Mare Island
Way
Maine Street Sonoma Boulevard 60.7 61.1 0.5
Sacramento Street Georgia Street Maine Street 50.2 53.7 3.4 Notes: dBA = A-weighted decibel; Ldn = day-night equivalent noise level.

Source: Modeled by Ascent 2023.

As shown in Table 8, implementation of the project would result in noise increases ranging from 0.1 dBA to 3.4 dBA Ldn on roadway segments within the project vicinity. The project would not result in a substantial noise increase (i.e., 5 dB or more) compared to existing conditions. All roadways currently experience noise levels below the “Normally Acceptable” levels applicable to the project area (i.e, 60 dBA Ldn for single-family residential, 65 dBA Ldn for residential multi-family and 75 dBA Ldn for nonresidential uses) and the project would not result increases in noise that exceed these levels along modeled roadway segments. Long-term operational noise from the project would not result in substantial increases in noise or levels that exceed applicable City standards.

Exposure to Existing Community Noise
As discussed above, the Vallejo General Plan establishes guidelines for noise exposure to new development based on the specific land use. Based on the land use categories established in Table NBE-1 (presented as Table 4 in this study) of the General Plan, new schools are subject to existing noise exposure levels of up to 70 dBA Ldn. As shown above in Table 1, an existing 24-hour noise measurement was conducted on January 4, 2024 and using the individual Leq data for each hour of the 24-hour period, a 24-hour Ldn was calculated of 65.5 dBA, which is below the level identified by the City of Vallejo as normally acceptable for school uses (i.e., 70 dBA Ldn). The proposed school would not be exposed to noise levels exceeding City of Vallejo’s adopted noise exposure levels.

CONCLUSION
Project-generated construction noise would be short-term and temporary and would comply with the City of Vallejo’s construction noise standards and would not expose sensitive land uses to excessive noise. The project would not result in operational sources of substantial vibration. Project construction would not require the use of vibration- inducing equipment such as pile drivers and all construction would occur during the less sensitive daytime hours when people are awake thereby reducing the exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial vibration levels.

Operational stationary noise sources would not result in new substantial sources of noise to the project area or exceed applicably City standards. Operational increases in noise levels from vehicle trips would not result in a substantial increase in noise over existing conditions. Therefore, project related construction and operational noise and vibration would not be expected to exceed federal, state, or local standards or expose sensitive land uses to substantial increases in noise or vibration levels. Thus, approval of the project would not result in a significant effect related to noise.

Administrative Draft Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project January 22, 2024

Page 13 ends

REFERENCES
City of Vallejo. 2023. City of Vallejo Municipal Code Chapter 16.502.09 Noise. Available https://library.municode.com/ca/vallejo/codes/municipal_code?nodeId=TIT16ZO_PTVSIDEST_CH16.502PEST_

16.502.09NO. Accessed December 2023.

City of Vallejo. 2017. Propel Vallejo General Plan 2040. Available:
https://www.cityofvallejo.net/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=17961496. Accessed December 18, 2023.

Federal Transportation Authority. 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual.

Washington, DC. Available: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research- innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf.

Accessed December 2023.

Federal Highway Administration. 2006 (January). Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide. Washington, D.C.

Prepared by the Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Cambridge, MA. Available:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction_noise/rcnm/rcnm.pdf. Accessed December 2023.

Ascent 2023 (November). Noise Technical Study for the 5037 Patata Street Industrial Development Project. Prepared for the City of South Gate, South Gate, CA.

Attachment A
Noise Modeling and Measurements
Attenuation Calculations for Stationary Noise Sources
KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
noise level distance Ground Type noise level distance
(dBA) @ (ft) (soft/hard) (dBA) @ (ft)
truck activity 59.0 @ 100 hard 2 5 0.00 45.1 @ 494
Notes:

Sources:

Computation of the ground factor is based on the equation presentd in Table 4-26 on pg. 86 of FTA 2018, where the distance of the reference noise leve can be adjusted and the usage factor is not applied (i.e., the usage factor is equal to 1).

Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Washington, D.C. Available:
<http://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report- STEP 1: Identify the noise source and enter
the reference noise level (dBA and distance).

STEP 2: Select the ground type (hard or soft),
and enter the source and receiver heights.

STEP 3: Select the distance to the
receiver.

Estimates of attenuated noise levels do not account for reductions from intervening barriers, including walls, trees, vegetation, or structures of any type.

Computation of the attenuated noise level is based on the equation presented on pg. 176 and 177 of FTA 2018.

Source
Height (ft)
Receiver
Height (ft)
Ground
Factor
Attenuation CharacteristicsReference Noise Level

Sidewalk Improvements
Location
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet Equipment
Usage
Factor1
Threshold 398 Concrete Saw 0.2
SR 1 - Library 400
SR 2- Residences 494
Ground Type hard
Source Height 8
Receiver Height 5
Ground Factor2 0.00
Predicted Noise Level 3
Concrete Saw 83.0
Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1. 2 Based on Figure 6-5 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 6-23). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 12-3).

Leq(equip) = E.L.+10*log (U.F.) - 20*log (D/50) - 10*G*log (D/50) Where: E.L. = Emission Level;
U.F.= Usage Factor;
G = Constant that accounts for topography and ground effects (FTA 2006: pg 6-23); and D = Distance from source to receiver.

63.1 83.0
Reference Emission
Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50
feet1

64.9 Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)

65.0 Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet) Leq dBA at 50 feet3
90 Trenching (Leq)
Location
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet Equipment
Usage
Factor1
Threshold 264 Concrete Mixer Truck 0.2
SR 1 - Library 400 Pumps 0.5
SR 2- Residences 494
Ground Type hard
Source Height 8
Receiver Height 5
Ground Factor2 0.00
Predicted Noise Level 3
Concrete Mixer Truck 78.0
Pumps 74.0

79.5 Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1. 2 Based on Figure 6-5 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 6-23). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 12-3).

Leq dBA at 50 feet3
Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet)

59.6 Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)
Reference Emission
Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50
feet1

65.0 85

61.4 77

Equipment Description
Acoustical
Usage
Factor (%)
Spec
721.560
Lmax @
50ft (dBA
slow)
Actual
Measured
Lmax @
50ft
(dBA slow)
No. of
Actual Data
Samples
(count)
Spec
721.560
LmaxCalc
Spec
721.560
Leq
Distance
Actual
Measured
LmaxCalc
Actual
Measured
Leq
Auger Drill Rig 20 85 84 36 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0
Backhoe 40 80 78 372 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0
Bar Bender 20 80 na 0 74.0 67.0 100
Blasting na 94 na 0 88.0 100
Boring Jack Power Unit 50 80 83 1 74.0 71.0 100 77.0 74.0 Chain Saw 20 85 84 46 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0
Clam Shovel (dropping) 20 93 87 4 87.0 80.0 100 81.0 74.0 Compactor (ground) 20 80 83 57 74.0 67.0 100 77.0 70.0
Compressor (air) 40 80 78 18 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0
Concrete Batch Plant 15 83 na 0 77.0 68.7 100
Concrete Mixer Truck 40 85 79 40 79.0 75.0 100 73.0 69.0 Concrete Pump Truck 20 82 81 30 76.0 69.0 100 75.0 68.0 Concrete Saw 20 90 90 55 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0
Crane 16 85 81 405 79.0 71.0 100 75.0 67.0
Dozer 40 85 82 55 79.0 75.0 100 76.0 72.0
Drill Rig Truck 20 84 79 22 78.0 71.0 100 73.0 66.0
Drum Mixer 50 80 80 1 74.0 71.0 100 74.0 71.0
Dump Truck 40 84 76 31 78.0 74.0 100 70.0 66.0
Excavator 40 85 81 170 79.0 75.0 100 75.0 71.0
Flat Bed Truck 40 84 74 4 78.0 74.0 100 68.0 64.0
Front End Loader 40 80 79 96 74.0 70.0 100 73.0 69.0
Generator 50 82 81 19 76.0 73.0 100 75.0 72.0
Generator (<25KVA, VMS signs) 50 70 73 74 64.0 61.0 100 67.0 64.0 Gradall 40 85 83 70 79.0 75.0 100 77.0 73.0
Grader 40 85 na 0 79.0 75.0 100
Grapple (on Backhoe) 40 85 87 1 79.0 75.0 100 81.0 77.0 Horizontal Boring Hydr. Jack 25 80 82 6 74.0 68.0 100 76.0 70.0 Hydra Break Ram 10 90 na 0 84.0 74.0 100
Impact Pile Driver 20 95 101 11 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0 Jackhammer 20 85 89 133 79.0 72.0 100 83.0 76.0
Man Lift 20 85 75 23 79.0 72.0 100 69.0 62.0
Mounted Impact Hammer (hoe ram) 20 90 90 212 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0 Pavement Scarafier 20 85 90 2 79.0 72.0 100 84.0 77.0
Paver 50 85 77 9 79.0 76.0 100 71.0 68.0
Pickup Truck 40 55 75 1 49.0 45.0 100 69.0 65.0
Pneumatic Tools 50 85 85 90 79.0 76.0 100 79.0 76.0
Pumps 50 77 81 17 71.0 68.0 100 75.0 72.0
Refrigerator Unit 100 82 73 3 76.0 76.0 100 67.0 67.0
Rivit Buster/chipping gun 20 85 79 19 79.0 72.0 100 73.0 66.0 Rock Drill 20 85 81 3 79.0 72.0 100 75.0 68.0
Roller 20 85 80 16 79.0 72.0 100 74.0 67.0
Sand Blasting (Single Nozzle) 20 85 96 9 79.0 72.0 100 90.0 83.0 Scraper 40 85 84 12 79.0 75.0 100 78.0 74.0
Shears (on backhoe) 40 85 96 5 79.0 75.0 100 90.0 86.0
Slurry Plant 100 78 78 1 72.0 72.0 100 72.0 72.0
Slurry Trenching Machine 50 82 80 75 76.0 73.0 100 74.0 71.0 Soil Mix Drill Rig 50 80 na 0 74.0 71.0 100
Tractor 40 84 na 0 78.0 74.0 100
Vacuum Excavator (Vac-truck) 40 85 85 149 79.0 75.0 100 79.0 75.0 Vacuum Street Sweeper 10 80 82 19 74.0 64.0 100 76.0 66.0 Ventilation Fan 100 85 79 13 79.0 79.0 100 73.0 73.0
Vibrating Hopper 50 85 87 1 79.0 76.0 100 81.0 78.0
Vibratory Concrete Mixer 20 80 80 1 74.0 67.0 100 74.0 67.0 Vibratory Pile Driver 20 95 101 44 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0 Warning Horn 5 85 83 12 79.0 66.0 100 77.0 64.0
Welder / Torch 40 73 74 5 67.0 63.0 100 68.0 64.0
chipper 75
Source:

FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 9.1 U.S. Department of Transportation
CA/T Construction Spec. 721.560
Long-Term Noise Measurement Summary
KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Measurement Site: 241 Georgia Street, Vallejo CA
Measurement Date: 1/4/2024
Project Name: Elite Charter School
Day Evening Night Day Evening Night
0:00 51.5 141,254 0 0 1 0 0 141,254
1:00 58.3 676,083 0 0 1 0 0 676,083
2:00 53.7 234,423 0 0 1 0 0 234,423
3:00 48.7 74,131 0 0 1 0 0 74,131
4:00 52.6 181,970 0 0 1 0 0 181,970
5:00 56.5 446,684 0 0 1 0 0 446,684
6:00 65.1 3,235,937 0 0 1 0 0 3,235,937
7:00 62.7 1,862,087 1 0 0 1,862,087 0 0
8:00 65.2 3,311,311 1 0 0 3,311,311 0 0
9:00 62.7 1,862,087 1 0 0 1,862,087 0 0
10:00 60.3 1,071,519 1 0 0 1,071,519 0 0
11:00 63.3 2,137,962 1 0 0 2,137,962 0 0
12:00 61.9 1,548,817 1 0 0 1,548,817 0 0
13:00 64.1 2,570,396 1 0 0 2,570,396 0 0
14:00 63.0 1,995,262 1 0 0 1,995,262 0 0
15:00 62.5 1,778,279 1 0 0 1,778,279 0 0
16:00 62.8 1,905,461 1 0 0 1,905,461 0 0
17:00 62.0 1,584,893 1 0 0 1,584,893 0 0
18:00 60.2 1,047,129 1 0 0 1,047,129 0 0
19:00 62.3 1,698,244 0 1 0 0 1,698,244 0
20:00 58.1 645,654 0 1 0 0 645,654 0
21:00 63.2 2,089,296 0 1 0 0 2,089,296 0
22:00 59.4 870,964 0 0 1 0 0 870,964
23:00 52.7 186,209 0 0 1 0 0 186,209
Sum of Sound Power during Period wo/penalty 22,675,203 4,433,194 6,047,653 Log Factor for CNEL Penalty (i.e., 10*log(x)) 13 1 0
Sound Power during Period with penalty 22,675,203 13,299,582 60,476,532 Total Daily Sound Power, with penalties 96,451,317
Hours per Day 24
Average Hourly Sound Power, with penalties 4,018,805
CNE
L 66.0
Day Night Day Night
0 1 0 141,254
0 1 0 676,083
0 1 0 234,423
0 1 0 74,131
0 1 0 181,970
0 1 0 446,684
0 1 0 3,235,937
1 0 1,862,087 0
1 0 3,311,311 0
1 0 1,862,087 0
1 0 1,071,519 0
1 0 2,137,962 0
1 0 1,548,817 0
1 0 2,570,396 0
1 0 1,995,262 0
1 0 1,778,279 0
1 0 1,905,461 0
1 0 1,584,893 0
1 0 1,047,129 0
1 0 1,698,244 0
1 0 645,654 0
1 0 2,089,296 0
0 1 0 870,964
0 1 0 186,209
Sum of Sound Power during Period wo/penalty 27,108,397 6,047,653 Log Factor for Penalty (i.e., 10*log(x)) 11 0
Sound Power during Period with penalty 27,108,397 60,476,532 Total Daily Sound Power, with penalties 87,584,929
Hours per Day 24
Average Hourly Sound Power, with penalties 3,649,372
Ldn 65.6
Notes:

Log factors for the Ldn and CNEL penalties are provided in Table 2-12 on pg. 2-52 of Caltrans 2009.

Source:

Computation of Ldn
Ldn compu-
tation on next
page.

Computation of the CNEL based on 1-hour Leq measurements for each hour of a day are based on equation 2-27 on pg. 2-57 of Caltrans 2009.

Computation of the Ldn based on 1-hour Leq measurements for each hour of a day are based on equation 2-26 on pg. 2- 56 of Caltrans 2009.

California Deaprtment of Transportation (Caltrans), Divisiong of Environmental Analysis. 2009 (November). 2009 Technical Noise Supplement . Sacramento, CA. Available: <http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/noise/>. Accessed September 24, 2010.

Period of 24-Hour
Day (1=included,
0=not)
Sound Power
Breakdown by
Period of Day
Computation of CNEL
Period of 24-Hour Day
(1=included, 0=not)
Sound
Power
=10*Log(dBA
/10)
Sound
Level Leq
(dBA)
Hour of
Day
(military
time)
Sound Power Breakdown by
Period of Day

Short-Term Noise Measurements
Number Start Date Start Time End Time Duration Meas Mode In put Range Input Type SPL Time Weight LN% Freq Weight ST 2 1/4/24 8:45:46 AM 9:00:46 AM 0:15:00 Single Low Mic Fast dBA ST 1 1/4/24 9:02:35 AM 9:17:35 AM 0:15:00 Single Low Mic Fast dBA ST 3 1/4/24 9:18:51 AM 9:33:51 AM 0:15:00 Single Low Mic Fast dBA Overload UnderRange Sensitivity LAeq LAFmax LAFmin LAF10% LAF50% LAF90% No No 23.49mV/Pa 55.5 70.1 45.1 58.9 51.8 48.4
No No 23.49mV/Pa 56.3 66.3 42.3 60.2 52.9 45.7
No No 23.49mV/Pa 59.4 78.8 48.1 63.1 53.6 50.9
Long-Term Noise Measurements
Number Start Date Start Time End Time Duration Meas Mode Input Range Input Type SPL Time Weight LN% Freq Weight Overload UnderRange Sensiti vity LAeq LAFmax LAFmin 1 5 1/4/24 10:00:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 60.3 85.7 43.1 6 1/4/24 11:00:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 63.3 92.4 45.6 7 1/4/24 12:00:00 PM 1:00:00 PM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 61.9 85.6 44.8 8 1/4/24 1:00:00 PM 2:00:00 PM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 64.1 85.7 44.4 9 1/4/24 2:00:00 PM 3:00:00 PM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 63 87.2 44 10 1/4/24 3:00:00 PM 4:00:00 PM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA Yes No 18.02mV/Pa 62.5 90.4 45.5 11 1/4/24 4:00:00 PM 5:00:00 PM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA Yes No 18.02mV/Pa 62.8 91 45 12 1/4/24 5:00:00 PM 6:00:00 PM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 62 85.1 44.1 13 1/4/24 6:00:00 PM 7:00:00 PM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 60.2 84.7 44.7 14 1/4/24 7:00:00 PM 8:00:00 PM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 62.3 86.7 43.7 15 1/4/24 8:00:00 PM 9:00:00 PM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 58.1 80.6 40.7 16 1/4/24 9:00:00 PM 10:00:00 PM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 63.2 88.4 39.5 17 1/4/24 10:00:00 PM 11:00:00 PM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 59.4 87.5 38.5 18 1/4/24 11:00:00 PM 12:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 52.7 76.1 37.7 19 1/5/24 12:00:00 AM 1:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 51.5 72.4 35.4 20 1/5/24 1:00:00 AM 2:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA Yes No 18.02mV/Pa 58.3 97 34.3 21 1/5/24 2:00:00 AM 3:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 53.7 82.4 35.5 22 1/5/24 3:00:00 AM 4:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 48.7 70.6 35.6 23 1/5/24 4:00:00 AM 5:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 52.6 71.8 36.9 24 1/5/24 5:00:00 AM 6:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 56.5 74.6 40.5 25 1/5/24 6:00:00 AM 7:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 65.1 95.2 45.7 26 1/5/24 7:00:00 AM 8:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA Yes No 18.02mV/Pa 62.7 90.6 46.5 27 1/5/24 8:00:00 AM 9:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA Yes No 18.02mV/Pa 65.2 96.5 46.7 28 1/5/24 9:00:00 AM 10:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 62.7 91.4 46.6 29 1/5/24 10:00:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 1:00:00 Auto Low Mic Fast dBA No No 18.02mV/Pa 62.7 89.4 46.2 Traffic Noise Spreadsheet Calculator
Project:

Number Name From To
Summary of Net Changes
1 Sonoma Boulevard Florida Street Georgia Street 55.8 56.3 0.6 2 Sonoma Boulevard Georgia Street Curtola Parkway 59.1 59.2 0.1 3 Georgia Street Mare Island Way Santa Clara Street 51.4 52.5 1.1 4 Georgia Street Santa Clara Street Sacramento Street 49.6 50.9 1.2 5 Georgia Street Sacramento Street Sonoma Boulevard 52.2 52.9 0.7 6 Curtola Parkway/Mare Island Way Maine Street Sonoma Boulevard 60.7 61.1 0.5 7 Sacramento Street Georgia Street Maine Street 50.2 53.7 3.4 *All modeling assumes average pavement, level roadways (less than 1.5% grade), constant traffic flow and does not account for s hielding of any type or finite roadway adjustments. All levels are reported as A-weighted noise levels.

Segment Description and Location
Existing Conditions
Existing +
Project
Conditions
ȴ
ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐʹ
Existing +
Project
Existing Traffic Noise Spreadsheet Calculator
Project:

Noise Level Descriptor: Ldn
Site Conditions: Hard
Traffic Input: ADT
Traffic K-Factor:

Ldn,
Number Name From To (mph) Near Far % Auto % Medium % Heavy % Day % Eve % Night (dBA)5,6,7 75 dBA 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA Existing Conditions
1 Sonoma Boulevard Florida Street Georgia Street 6,690 25 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 55.8 2 Sonoma Boulevard Georgia Street Curtola Parkway 9,820 30 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 59.1 3 Georgia Street Mare Island Way Santa Clara Street 1,150 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 51.4 4 Georgia Street Santa Clara Street Sacramento Street 1,620 25 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 49.6 5 Georgia Street Sacramento Street Sonoma Boulevard 2,910 25 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 52.2 6 Curtola Parkway/Mare Island Way Maine Street Sonoma Boulevard 9,640 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 60.7 7 Sacramento Street Georgia Street Maine Street 870 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 50.2 *All modeling assumes average pavement, level roadways (less than 1.5% grade), constant traffic flow and does not account for shielding of any type or finite roadway adjustments. All levels are reported as A-weighted noise levels. 16 4 12 37 116
1 Input
Speed Traffic Distribution Characteristics
Output
Distance to
Directional
Centerline, (feet)4
1 3
4 8
1 12
Distance to Contour, (feet)
3 25
1 1
38 81
14 11
39 Segment Description and Location
ADT
26 4
3 Existing + Project Traffic Noise Spreadsheet Calculator Project:

Noise Level Descriptor: Ldn
Site Conditions: Hard
Traffic Input: ADT
Traffic K-Factor:

Ldn,
Number Name From To (mph) Near Far % Auto % Medium % Heavy % Day % Eve % Night (dBA)5,6,7 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Existing + Project Conditions
1 Sonoma Boulevard Florida Street Georgia Street 7,600 25 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 56.3 2 Sonoma Boulevard Georgia Street Curtola Parkway 10,040 30 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 59.2 3 Georgia Street Mare Island Way Santa Clara Street 1,470 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 52.5 4 Georgia Street Santa Clara Street Sacramento Street 2,160 25 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 50.9 5 Georgia Street Sacramento Street Sonoma Boulevard 3,450 25 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 52.9 6 Curtola Parkway/Mare Island Way Maine Street Sonoma Boulevard 10,780 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 61.1 7 Sacramento Street Georgia Street Maine Street 1,920 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 53.7 *All modeling assumes average pavement, level roadways (less than 1.5% grade), constant traffic flow and does not account for shielding of any type or finite roadway adjustments. All levels are reported as A-weighted noise levels. 2 7 23 73
13 41 130 412
2 6 18 56
1 4 12 39
8 26 83 261
2 6 19 62
Segment Description and Location Distance to Contour, (feet)3 4 14 43 136
Input Output
ADT
Speed
Distance to
Directional
Centerline, (feet)4 Traffic Distribution Characteristics Roadway From To AM PM AM-Derived PM-Derived AM PM AM-Derived PM-Derived Sonoma Boulevard Florida Street Georgia Street 669 1216 6,690 12,160 760 1274 7,600 12,740 Sonoma Boulevard Georgia Street Curtola Parkway 576 982 5,760 9,820 628 1004 6,280 10,040 Georgia Street Mare Island Way Santa Clara Street 115 183 1,150 1,830 147 199 1,470 1,990 Georgia Street Santa Clara Street Sacramento Street 162 233 1,620 2,330 216 264 2,160 2,640 Georgia Street Sacramento Street Sonoma Boulevard 226 291 2,260 2,910 265 345 2,650 3,450 Curtola Parkway Maine Street Sonoma Boulevard 964 1174 9,640 11,740 1078 1119 10,780 11,190 Sacramento Street Georgia Street Maine Street 87 109 870 1,090 192 153 1,920 1,530 K-Factor
K-Factor 10

1. K-Factor represents proportion of peak-hour volumes to ADT volumes EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING + PROJECT
Peak Hour Segment Total ADT1 Peak Hour Segment Total ADT1 Study Int # N/S St E/W ST NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 1 Sonoma Boulevard Florida Street 29 339 12 36 275 39 43 49 25 8 57 25 14 666 9 51 505 69 97 49 25 14 57 52 2 Mare Island Way Georgia Street 16 587 9 39 429 3 12 4 5 14 11 36 32 579 14 51 425 5 31 20 15 20 16 111 3 S a n t a C l a r a S t r e e t G e o r g i a S t r e e t 8 3 31 22 13 0 3 4 3 71 22 55 21 52 74 62 23 03 71 51 37 71 01 05 63 8 4 S a c r a m e n t o S t r e e t G e o r g i a S t r e e t 2 5 3 2 54 8 8 9 5 4 7 8 8 41 91 24 71 42 25 91 41 9 1 0 55 1 57 82 3 5 Sonoma Boulevard Georgia Street 13 282 11 39 234 32 10 65 12 35 99 69 25 565 41 89 367 38 33 122 17 18 87 74 6 Mare Island Way Maine Street 2 606 36 68 371 34 24 2 515 28 60 457 42 47 7 Maine Street Sacramento Street 32 6 11 33 38 13 40 13 9 69 49 21 8 Sonoma Boulevard Curtola Parkway 211 144 7 147 73 10 338 101 434 151 253 380 29 215 148 16 406 128 337 200 Study Int # N/S St E/W ST NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 1 Sonoma Boulevard Florida Street 29 5 51 6 2 34 5 20 2 1 2 Mare Island Way Georgia Street 4 14 14 1 4 3 6 5 5
3 Santa Clara Street Georgia Street 4 6 20 8 1 26 2 3 4 13 5 11 2 4 Sacramento Street Georgia Street 22 4 28 22 58 1 2 5 9 8 2 18 9 27 5 S o n o m a B o u l e v a r d G e o r g i a S t r e e t 9 2 3 1 3 2 0 2 7 1 1989 3 5 5 2 1 8 7 1 1 1 5 1 5 46 1 1 6 Mare Island Way Maine Street 14 1 1 4 6 1 3
7 Maine Street Sacramento Street 15 2 19 1 9 13
8 S o n o m a B o u l e v a r d C u r t o l a P a r k w a y 79 1 1 1 1 1 16 32 78 21 33 Study Int # N/S St E/W ST NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 1 Sonoma Boulevard Florida Street 29 368 17 36 326 39 43 49 25 14 59 25 14 700 14 51 525 69 97 49 25 16 58 52 2 Mare Island Way Georgia Street 16 591 23 53 430 3 12 4 5 14 11 40 32 582 20 56 425 5 31 20 15 20 16 116 3 Santa Clara Street Georgia Street 12 39 32 29 31 3 4 63 14 25 52 15 30 50 35 35 37 15 13 88 10 10 58 38 4 S a c r a m e n t o S t r e e t G e o r g i a S t r e e t 0 2 5 3 2 57 0 8 1 38 22 96 68 42 01 45 22 32 26 71 42 1 1 2 3 1 44 27 82 3 5 Sonoma Boulevard Georgia Street 22 305 24 39 254 59 21 74 20 44 134 69 30 586 49 89 374 49 48 137 21 24 98 74 6 M a r e I s l a n d W a y M a i n e S t r e e t 2 6 2 0 3 7 6 9 3 7 1 0000 3 4 0 2 8 2 5 2 1 2 8 6 0 4 5 7 0000 4 3 0 5 0 7 Maine Street Sacramento Street 0 0 0 32 0 21 13 33 0 0 57 14 0 0 0 40 0 22 9 69 0 0 62 21 8 Sonoma Boulevard Curtola Parkway 218 153 7 158 84 10 0 338 101 0 445 157 256 382 29 222 156 16 0 408 129 0 340 203 Study Int # N/S St E/W ST NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 1 Sonoma Boulevard Florida Street 30 340 20 40 280 40 50 50 30 10 60 30 20 670 10 60 510 70 100 50 30 20 60 60 2 Mare Island Way Georgia Street 20 590 10 40 430 10 20 10 10 20 20 40 40 580 20 60 430 10 40 20 20 20 20 120 3 Santa Clara Street Georgia Street 10 40 20 30 30 10 10 40 20 30 60 20 30 50 30 30 40 20 20 80 10 10 70 40 4 Sacramento Street Georgia Street 30 10 30 50 10 10 70 10 10 90 20 20 50 20 30 60 20 20 110 10 20 80 30 5 Sonoma Boulevard Georgia Street 20 290 20 40 240 40 10 70 20 40 100 70 30 570 50 90 370 40 40 130 20 20 90 80 6 Mare Island Way Maine Street 10 610 40 70 380 40 30 10 520 30 60 460 50 50 7 Maine Street Sacramento Street 40 10 20 40 40 20 40 20 10 70 50 30 8 Sonoma Boulevard Curtola Parkway 220 150 10 150 80 10 340 110 440 160 260 380 30 220 150 20 410 130 340 200 Study Int # N/S St E/W ST NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 1 Sonoma Boulevard Florida Street 30 369 25 40 331 40 50 50 30 16 62 30 20 704 15 60 530 70 100 50 30 22 61 60 2 Mare Island Way Georgia Street 20 594 24 54 431 10 20 10 10 20 20 44 40 583 26 65 430 10 40 20 20 20 20 125 3 Santa Clara Street Georgia Street 14 46 40 38 31 10 10 66 22 30 60 20 33 54 43 35 40 20 20 91 10 10 72 40 4 S a c r a m e n t o S t r e e t G e o r g i a S t r e e t 0 3 01 03 07 21 01 49 83 26 89 02 12 25 52 93 06 82 02 2 1 2 8 1 94 78 03 0 5 Sonoma Boulevard Georgia Street 29 313 33 40 260 67 21 79 28 49 135 70 35 591 58 90 377 51 55 145 24 26 101 80 6 M a r e I s l a n d W a y M a i n e S t r e e t 1 0 6 2 4 4 1 7 1 3 8 0 0000 4 0 0 3 4 1 0 5 2 6 3 0 6 0 4 6 0 0000 5 1 0 5 3 7 M a i n e S t r e e t S a c r a m e n t o S t r e e t 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 52 24 0 0 0 5 92 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 91 07 0 0 0 6 33 0 8 Sonoma Boulevard Curtola Parkway 227 159 10 161 91 10 0 340 110 0 451 166 263 382 30 227 158 20 0 412 131 0 343 203 Study Int # N/S St E/W ST NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 1 Sonoma Boulevard Florida Street 40 380 20 40 310 50 50 60 30 10 70 30 20 740 10 60 560 80 110 60 30 20 70 60 2 Mare Island Way Georgia Street 20 740 20 50 540 10 20 10 10 20 20 40 40 730 20 70 540 10 40 30 20 30 20 130 3 Santa Clara Street Georgia Street 10 40 20 30 40 10 10 50 20 30 60 20 30 60 30 40 50 20 20 90 20 20 70 50 4 Sacramento Street Georgia Street 30 10 30 60 10 10 80 10 10 100 30 20 60 20 30 70 20 30 120 10 20 90 30 5 Sonoma Boulevard Georgia Street 20 310 20 50 260 40 20 80 20 40 110 80 30 630 50 100 410 50 40 140 20 20 100 90 6 M a r e I s l a n d W a y M a i n e S t r e e t 1 0 7 6 0 5 0 9 0 4 7 0 0000 4 0 0 3 0 1 0 6 5 0 4 0 8 0 5 8 0 0000 5 0 0 6 0 7 M a i n e S t r e e t S a c r a m e n t o S t r e e t 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 02 04 0 0 0 5 02 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 01 08 0 0 0 6 03 0 8 Sonoma Boulevard Curtola Parkway 240 160 10 170 90 20 0 380 120 0 480 170 280 420 40 240 170 20 450 150 370 220 Study Int # N/S St E/W ST NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 1 Sonoma Boulevard Florida Street 40 409 25 40 361 50 50 60 30 16 72 30 20 774 15 60 580 80 110 60 30 22 71 60 2 Mare Island Way Georgia Street 20 744 34 64 541 10 20 10 10 20 20 44 40 733 26 75 540 10 40 30 20 30 20 135 3 Santa Clara Street Georgia Street 14 46 40 38 41 10 10 76 22 30 60 20 33 64 43 45 50 20 20 101 20 20 72 50 4 Sacramento Street Georgia Street 0 30 10 30 82 10 14 108 32 68 100 31 22 65 29 30 78 20 32 138 19 47 90 30 5 Sonoma Boulevard Georgia Street 29 333 33 50 280 67 31 89 28 49 145 80 35 651 58 100 417 61 55 155 24 26 111 90 6 M a r e I s l a n d W a y M a i n e S t r e e t 1 0 7 7 4 5 1 9 1 4 7 0 0000 4 0 0 3 4 1 0 6 5 6 4 0 8 0 5 8 0 0000 5 1 0 6 3 7 M a i n e S t r e e t S a c r a m e n t o S t r e e t 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 52 24 0 0 0 6 92 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 91 08 0 0 0 7 33 0 8 Sonoma Boulevard Curtola Parkway 247 169 10 181 101 20 0 380 120 0 491 176 283 422 40 247 178 20 0 452 151 0 373 223 Existing Balanced AM Peak PM Peak
Project Trips Balanced AM Peak PM Peak
Existing Plus Project AM Peak PM Peak
Opening Year AM Peak PM Peak
Cumulative + Project AM Peak PM Peak
Opening Year + Project AM Peak PM Peak
Cumulative AM Peak PM Peak
Citation # Citations
1 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Table (5-11), Pg 5-60. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Table (4-2), Pg 4-17. 2 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-26), Pg 5-60. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Equation (4-5), Pg 4-17. 3 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (2-16), Pg 2-32. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 4 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-11), Pg 5-47, 48. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 5 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (2-26), Pg 2-55, 56. Caltrans Technical Noise S upplement. 2013 (September). Equation (2-23), Pg 2-51, 52. 6 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (2-27), Pg 2-57. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Equation (2-24), Pg 2-53. 7 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Pg 2-53. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Pg 2-57. 8 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-7), Pg 5-45. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 9 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-8), Pg 5-45. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 10 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-9), Pg 5-45. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 11 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-13), Pg 5-49. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 12 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-14), Pg 5-49. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 13 Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model Technical Manual. Report No. FHWA-PD-96-010. 1998 (January). Equation (16) , Pg 67 14 Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model Technical Manual. Report No. FHWA-PD-96-010. 1998 (January). Equation (20) , Pg 69 15 Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model Technical Manual. Report No. FHWA-PD-96-010. 1998 (January). Equation (18) , Pg 69 References
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2009 (November). Technical Noise S upplement. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/noise/pub/tens_complete.pdf. Accessed August 17, 2017.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2013 (September). Te chnical Noise Supplement. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/noise/pub/TeNS_Sept_2013A.pdf. Accessed August 17, 2017.

Federal Highway Administration. 2004. Traffic Noise Model Version 2.5. Available: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/tr affic_noise_model/tnm_v25/. Accessed August 17, 2017.

Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project

Source: Ascent 2024.

Long-Term Noise Measurement.

Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project

Source: Ascent 2024.

Short-Term Noise Measurement #1.

Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project

Source: Ascent 2024.

Short-Term Noise Measurement #2.

Noise and Vibration Study - Elite Charter School Project

Source: Ascent 2024.

Short-Term Noise Measurement #3.

Memo
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.444.7301

Date: February 21, 2024
To: Christina Ratcliffe, Planning and Development Services Director, City of Vallejo CC: Erwin Ordonez, Interwest
From: Alta Cunningham, M.A. Historic Preservation, Dimitri Antoniou, Ascent Environmental Subject: Historical Resources Study - 241-255 Georgia Street in Vallejo, CA Class 32 Exemption

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Ascent Environmental has been retained to prepare technical memos in support of a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Class 32 Categorical Exemption for the Elite Charter School Project, (project), located in the City of Vallejo, California. Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines allows for the use of a categorical exemption for infill development, provided the contemplated development meets certain criteria, and that none of the exceptions to the exemptions apply (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2). This includes not causing a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource; this includes both built environment features and archaeological sites. This memo addresses the project’s potential to affect historical resources.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The project site is located at 241-255 Georgia Street on Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 0055-170-390 in Vallejo, California. The project site is bounded by an existing commercial development to the west, Georgia Street to the north, Sacramento Street to the east, and an existing parking lot and Vallejo Transit Center to the south. The project site is currently occupied by a two-story building.

The proposed project would provide a new public charter high school that would accommodate a maximum of 400 students and 35 staff. The proposed project would be completed in phases as the school continues to grow enrollment and additional funds for construction become available. The existing structure would not be demolished but internal improvements would be made to reconfigure the building layout. The initial development phase proposes to develop approximately 18,000 square feet of interior space suitable for 13 classrooms, four offices, bathroom facilities, a serving kitchen, a multi-purpose room, a library alcove, and a future gymnasium on the ground floor. The second development phase proposes to develop five additional classrooms, storage areas, restrooms, a conference room, and four private offices on the second floor. The proposed project would also include development of perimeter fencing for security purposes, school signage, the reconfiguration of 16 parking spaces into eight parking spaces along Sacramento Street, as well as the addition of 36 bicycle parking spaces. The proposed project improvements would be ADA accessible and comply with State design and construction standards.

Final Historical Resources Study - 241-255 Georgia Street February 21. 2024

Page 2 ends

Vallejo City CouncilApril 30, 2024

Vallejo City Council
April 30, 2024