City Council Chambers
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA
www.victorvilleca.gov
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
VICTORVILLE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS RAIL AUTHORITY
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THE CITY AS HOUSING ASSETS SUCCESSOR
JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT
Regular Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, February 21, 2023
5:00 p.m. Closed Session
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
The
City
Council
holds
its
business
meetings
in
public
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
the
Ralph
M.
Brown
Act,
its
established
policies
and
procedures,
and
its
adopted
parliamentary
authority.
The
Council
strives
to
carry
out
its
meetings
in
an
atmosphere
of
professionalism
with
full
participation
by
members
of
the
body
and
the
public.
As
such,
the
Presiding
Officer
is
empowered
to
govern
City
Council
Meetings
to
foster
the
efficient
and
fair
administration
of
City
business
and
reserves
the
right
to
enforce
(or
cause
to
be
enforced)
the
Meeting
Rules
of
Conduct
and
Decorum
as
set
forth
in
Chapter
5 of
the
City
Council Policy and Procedures Manual.
The
City
Council
welcomes
and
encourages
public
participation
and
invites
the
community
to
attend
in
person.
Now
that
COVID-19
cases
in
our
area
have
reduced
to
a
point
that
social
distancing
requirements
have
been
lifted,
City
Council
Meetings
will
be
held
in-person
at
City
Hall
in
Council
Chambers.
Remote
viewing
of
our
Council
Meetings
is
available
through
YouTube,
but
public comments must be given in-person at the meeting or in advance as noted below.
Public
Comments:
Members
of
the
public
may
submit
comments
electronically
to
by
4 p.m.
the
day
of
the
meeting
to
be
distributed
to
City
Council.
Participants
are
invited
to
address
the
Council
on
agendized
and
non-agendized
topics
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
Public
comments
will
be
no
longer
than
three
(3)
minutes
per
community
member.
Should
a
speaker
conclude
their
comments
prior
to
the
expiration
of
three
(3)
minutes,
the
speaker
waives
the
right
to
speak
for
any
remaining
amount
of
time.
For
further
information
about
how
to
address
the
Council,
please refer to the City’s website at
victorvilleca.gov/government/agendas
.
In
compliance
with
the
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act,
if
you
need
special
assistance
to
participate
in
this
meeting,
please
contact
the
City
Clerk’s
office
at
(760)
955-5188
no
later
than
72 hours
prior
to
the
meeting.
5:00 p.m. Closed Session
Call to Order
Roll Call
Introduction to Public Comments
Public Comments for Closed Session Items
Declaration of Closed Session Item(s) by City Attorney
CITY COUNCIL
A.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(1)
Case
name
unspecified:
(Disclosure
would
jeopardize
existing
settlement
negotiations)
B.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(1)
Case
name
unspecified:
(Disclosure
would
jeopardize
existing
settlement
negotiations)
C.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(1)
Case
name
unspecified:
(Disclosure
would
jeopardize
existing
settlement
negotiations)
D.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(1)
Case
name
unspecified:
(Disclosure
would
jeopardize
existing
settlement
negotiations)
E.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(1)
Case
name
unspecified:
(Disclosure
would
jeopardize
existing
settlement
negotiations)
Recess to Closed Session
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
Call to Order
Roll Call
Closed Session Announcements by the City Attorney
Invocation: Presbyter Elfrem Wilson of Destiny Christian Church
Pledge of Allegiance: Police Captain John Wickum
City Clerk Presents Agenda/Revisions to Agenda
Conflict of Interest Declarations
Any
items
on
this
agenda
that
might
be
a
conflict
of
interest
to
any
Council
Members/Board Members should be identified at this time.
Introduction to Public Comments
Public Comments
PUBLIC HEARING(S)
1. United
States
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development
Required
Public
Hearing for Community Planning and Development Grants - Fiscal Year 2023-2024
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
conduct
a
public
hearing
to
receive
citizen,
agency,
and
prospective
applicant
comments
regarding
the
City’s
needs
and
strategies
for
the
2023-2024 Annual Action Plan.
2. Sewer Main Lining 2023 Project – Award of Construction Contract
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Open and conduct a Public Hearing;
(2) Close the Public Hearing;
(3)
Find
the
project
exempt
from
environmental
review
under
the
California
Environmental
Quality
Act
(CEQA)
pursuant
to
Section
15301(b)
of
the
CEQA
guidelines and Approve the Notice of Exemption; and
(4)
Award
a
construction
contract
to
Southwest
Pipeline
and
Trenchless
Corp.,
in
the amount of $1,813,690.00 for the Sewer Main Lining 2023 Project.
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. Environmental
Programs
Quarterly
Report
for
the
Second
Quarter
of
Fiscal
Year
2023
Recommendation:
That the Honorable Victorville City Council review and file.
4. Public Works O&M Statistics for the Second Quarter of Fiscal Year 2023
Recommendation:
That the Honorable Victorville City Council review and file.
5. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
ratify
Commercial
Demand
Schedule
No.
15 in
the
amount
of
$14,473,918.61,
covering
Electronic
Fund
Transfers
No.
333279
through
333528
and
Warrant
No.
788868
through
789104
for
01/20/2023
through
02/02/2023
and
Wire
Transfer
dated
01/23/2023,
per
the
adopted
budget
for
Fiscal
Year
2022-2023
for
the
period
covering
July
1,
2022
through
June
30,
2023.
6. Quarterly Investment Report as of December 31, 2022
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council/Board
of
Directors
receive
and
file
the
attached
Quarterly
Investment Report as of December 31, 2022.
7. Landscape
Maintenance
Assessment
District
Full
Securities
Release
for
Tract
Map
No. 16720
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
full
release
of
the
Landscape
Maintenance
Assessment
District
Faithful
Performance
and
Labor
&
Materials
Securities for Tract Map No. 16720.
8. Acceptance
of
Improvements
and
Subdivision
Improvement
Release
for
Tract
Map
No. 17089
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
accept
the
public
improvements
for
Tract
Map
No.
17089 and release the Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
9. Release
of
Subdivision
Improvement
Agreement
and
Full
Security
Deposit
Release
for Tract Map No. 17945
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
release
of
the
Subdivision
Improvement
Agreement
and
the
full
release
of
the
Security
Deposit
for
Tract
Map
No. 17945.
10. Payroll Warrant List
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
ratify
Payroll
Demand
Schedule
No.
7A
for
Payroll
Period
December
23,
2022,
through
January
06,
2023,
in
the
amount
of
$2,130,546.09
covering
Check
Nos.
33217
through
33227,
including
Vendor
checks.
Please
note
employee
Check
No.
33219
has
a
live
Check
and
an
EFT
Advice.
Also
included
is
Advice
No.
295655
and
Nos.
296133
through
296615,
per
adopted
budget
for
Fiscal
Year
2022-2023
(period
covering
July
1,
2022,
through
June 30, 2023).
11. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2434
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
adopt,
by
second
reading,
Ordinance
No.
2434
revising
and
establishing
speed
zones
upon
certain
streets
in
the
City
by
amending
Title
12,
Chapter
12.20,
Section
12.20.020
of
the
Victorville
Municipal
Code,
entitled
“Decrease of State Law Maximum Speed.”
12. Code
Compliance
Department
Activity
Reports
-
FY2023
2nd
Quarter,
Code
Compliance Animal Care & Control Divisions
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council review and file.
13. Notice of Completion - Automated Gate Services, Inc
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council
(1)
Accept
as
complete
and
approve
the
Notice
of
Completion
for
the
installation
of
automatic gates at Fire Station 312, 313, 314 and 315, Project CC22-088 and (2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Notice of Completion.
14. Seventh
Avenue
and
Arrowhead
Drive
Capital
Improvement
Project
Grant
Funding
Reimbursement
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
Adopt
Resolution
No.
23-010
to
authorize
the
submittal
of
claims
and
requests
for
reimbursements
from
Transportation
Development
Act
(TDA)
Article
3 funds
from
the
San
Bernardino
County
Transportation
Authority
(SBCTA)
and
authorize
the
City
Engineer
to
certify
the
completion of the project.
15. Substitution
of
Trustee
and
Deed
of
Reconveyance
and
Release
of
Declaration
of
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Map Case No 08-08-08 - Streeter
Recommendation:
That Your Honorable City Council:
(1)
Approve
the
Substitution
of
Trustee
and
Deed
of
Reconveyance
for
MAP
Case
No.08-08-08;
(2)
Approve
the
Termination
and
Release
of
Declaration
of
Covenants,
Conditions,
and Restrictions and Notice of Affordability Restrictions on Transfer of Property; (3) Authorize the execution thereof by the City Manager; (4) Accept the payoff of the loan receivable; and
(5)
Adopt
Resolution
No.
CHAS
23-001,
amending
the
annual
budget
for
Fiscal
Year 2022-2023.
16. Adoption
of
proposed
City
Council
Resolution
No
23-011
confirming
increases
to
the Rate of Compensation for the Members of the Victorville Planning Commission
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1)
Review
and
Consider
the
Proposed
Resolution
Increasing
the
Victorville
Planning
Commission
Rate
of
Compensation
and
Rescinding
Resolution
No.
06-
156; and
(2) Adopt Resolution No. 23-011
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
17. Septic to Sewer Conversion Project – Purchase of Sewer Lift Station
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
a
General
Services
Provider
Standard
Agreement
with
ROMTEC
Utilities
for
the
design,
fabrication,
and
delivery
of
a
sewer
lift
station
for
the
Willow
Street
Septic
to
Sewer
Conversion
Project,
in
an
amount not to exceed $227,252.85.
18. Award
of
Contract
to
LM
Rasmussen
Construction
for
the
Exeloo
Automatic
Restrooms Installation at Brentwood and Center Street Parks, Project CC23-079
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
award
a
Construction
Agreement
to
LM
Rasmussen
Construction
in
the
amount
of
$184,843.00
for
the
Exeloo
Automatic
Restroom Installation at Brentwood and Center Street Parks, Project CC23-079.
19. California
Department
of
Water
Resources
–
2022
Urban
Community
Drought
Relief Grant Program
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
Victorville
Water
District
Board
of
Directors
adopt
Resolution
No.
VWD
23-002,
authorizing
the
2022
Urban
Community
Drought
Relief
Grant
Program
application,
acceptance,
and
execution
for
the
District’s
Advance
Metering
Infrastructure
(AMI),
Turf
Replacement
Rebate,
and
Ultra-High
Efficiency
Toilet
Direct Installation Replacement Projects.
20. Grant of Easement on the Southern California Logistics Airport
Recommendation:
That
the
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport
Authority
(“SCLAA”)
Board
of
Directors:
(1)
Grant
a
utility
easement
on
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport
Authority
property
to
Southern
California
Edison
across
the
parcel
designated
as
APN
0459-
192-58; and
(2) Authorize the Airport Director to execute said instrument.
21. Purchase
and
Sale
Agreement
by
and
between
the
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport Authority and the Victorville Water District
Recommendation:
That
Your
Honorable
Southern
California
Logistics
Airport
Authority
and
Victorville
Water District Board of Directors approve:
(1)
Resolution
No.
SCLAA
23-001
approving
the
sale
of
a
portion
of
Parcel
J
and
authorizing
the
Executive
Director
to
execute
transactional
documents
to
effectuate
the sale and transfer of the property;
(2)
Resolution
No.
VWD
23-003
approving
the
purchase
of
a
portion
of
Parcel
J
and
authorizing
the
General
Manager
to
execute
transactional
documents
to
effectuate the purchase and transfer of the property; and (3)
Resolution
No.
SCLAA
23-002
amending
the
SCLAA
annual
budget
for
fiscal
year 2022/2023 to recognize the sale proceeds.
22. Attendance
at
National
Association
of
Latino
Elected
and
Appointed
Officials
40th
Annual Conference
Recommendation:
That
Your
Honorable
City
Council
authorize
attendance
at
the
NALEO
40th
Annual
Conference for the Mayor, and Mayor Pro-Tem.
23. City Manager Reports
24. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Upcoming Agenda Items
25. Reports from Council Members
Adjournment
Item Number: 1
City Council / Board of Directors
Public Hearing(s)
Meeting of: February 21, 2023
Submitted By:
Scott Webb, City Planner
Subject:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Required Public Hearing for Community Planning and Development Grants - Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Recommendation:
That the City Council conduct a public hearing to receive citizen, agency, and prospective applicant comments regarding the City’s needs and strategies for the 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan.
Fiscal Impact:
None at this time; however, associated Agenda Items in the future will guide the disbursement of approximately $1.9 million dollars in federal Community Planning and Development (CPD) Grants.
Strategic Plan Goal:
The proposed public hearing will allow the City Council to obtain public input regarding the future allocation of available HUD funding via the 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan, which will enable the City to further fulfill the following Goals outlined in the 2020-2023 Strategic Plan:
•Goal A (Financial Sustainability) – Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) funds represent funding opportunities that require limited financial commitments while ensuring greater availability of general fund resources.
•Goal D (Reduce Homelessness) – Eligible activities such as public service and housing projects are aimed to directly benefit the homeless population as well as those at risk of homelessness, providing the City an opportunity to expand the outreach network and partnerships.
•Goal E (Invest In Infrastructure) – Projects that benefit or improve City facilities (e.g. parks and recreational facilities, the City Library, etc.) are eligible projects 2 9
8 6
when located within CDBG Target Areas or when serving target populations and would enable the City to take actions to implement various City plans such as the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and the Library Master Plan.
Background:
In 1997, the City of Victorville became an Entitlement City with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This status allows the City to receive Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds directly from HUD. Prior to Victorville’s status as an Entitlement City, CDBG funding was awarded to the City of Victorville through the County of San Bernardino and was subject to projects/programs that fulfilled a countywide need rather than those specific to the City.
The City of Victorville successfully formed a consortium in 2003 with the Town of Apple Valley in order to meet the threshold of obtaining HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) entitlement status with HUD. The successful formation of the consortium results in an annual allocation of HOME funds to both communities, which can be used in concert with CDBG funding to address specific needs within the City of Victorville.
As an Entitlement City for both programs, staff is responsible for all required tasks including program development, application guidance and processing, determination of project eligibility, project oversight, contract compliance, all reporting requirements, and direct draw of funds from HUD.
One of the key requirements of an Entitlement City status is the development of a five- year planning document, known as the Consolidated Plan (ConPlan). Pursuant to Section 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91, HUD has established regulations that set forth the ConPlan process. The ConPlan is designed to help states and local jurisdictions to assess their affordable housing and community development needs, market conditions, and to make data-driven, place-based investment decisions. The ConPlan, which may have a duration of between 3 and 5 years, describes the jurisdiction’s community development priorities and multiyear goals based on an assessment of housing and community development needs, an analysis of current housing and economic market conditions and available resources. Subpart E of Section 24 CFR Part 91, requires local governments that participate in a consortium to include said consortium in the ConPlan. Pursuant to this regulation, on April 19, 2022, the City of Victorville adopted the 2022-2026 ConPlan, including the required consortium component.
The ConPlan is carried out through Annual Action Plans, which provide a concise summary of the actions, activities and the specific federal and non-federal resources that will be used each year to address the priority needs and specific goals identified by the ConPlan. Each year, grantees must submit an updated Action Plan describing the specific planned uses for HUD program funds, including CDBG and HOME. The fiscal year 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan represents the second program year of the 2022- 2026 ConPlan. A copy of the ConPlan in its entirety is available for the public on the City’s website (Attachment A); however, the priority needs outlined in the City’s 2022-2026 ConPlan are provided for your reference as follows:
2 9
8 6
•Supportive services for the homeless and at risk
•Human services
•Housing programs
•Accessibility and Mobility
•Economic Development
As part of the Action Plan preparation and adoption process, citizens of the City of Victorville are afforded an opportunity to provide input on housing and community development needs and issues affecting very-low and low income persons. Public notices to facilitate community participation were published in a local newspaper 10 days prior to the hearing date in accordance with the Citizen Participation Plan (Attachment B), which included notices in both English and Spanish and the notice was also placed at the Victorville City Library, Hook Community Center and posted on the City’s website. Lastly, statements regarding the availability of special accommodations for non-English speaking persons and those with disabilities are printed on all written materials pertaining to the Annual Action Plan development.
Discussion:
The purpose of this HUD required public hearing is to gather community input, incorporate citizen participation and complete the tasks necessary in the creation of the 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan by:
1. Receiving citizen and agency comments regarding the City’s needs and strategies for the upcoming 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan, including comments regarding proposed projects for FY 2023-2024, as required by HUD guidelines in the City of Victorville’s Citizen Participation Plan; and
2. Allowing prospective applicants for FY 2023-2024 CDBG/HOME grant funds an opportunity to share their needs.
ESTIMATED FUNDING:
The City is estimated to receive a 2023-2024 CDBG allocation amount of $1,358,971 and a HOME allocation of $574,463, based on 2022-2023 grant allocations. As of this writing, the 2023-2024 Federal budget has not been approved and HUD states that the grant amounts may change depending upon their final, actual appropriation. An example of the current fiscal year 2022-2023 funding is provided in Attachment C. Additionally, the noted amounts are anticipated to remain consistent annually over the course of the 5-year ConPlan with slight increases or decreases possible based upon historic fluctuations in funding allocations due to various factors including population and need.
1. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The City is required to utilize CDBG grant funding to “provide decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunities.” It is required by the Federal government that “the aggregate use of CDBG funds....shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures 2 9
8 6
that at least 70 percent of the amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons ....”. This grant has funding restrictions for certain functions (Public Services - 15%, and Administration - 20% maximum allocations), but generally can be distributed as follows:
•Public Service Projects - $203,846 (15% of Total CDBG Allocation) •Construction/Other Projects - $883,331 (65% of Total CDBG Allocation) •Administration - $271,794 (20% of Total CDBG Allocation) TOTAL - $1,358,971 (2023-2024 estimated CDBG Allocation)
2. HOME
The City is required to utilize HOME grant funding to “provide decent affordable housing to lower-income households; expand the capacity of nonprofit housing providers; strengthen the ability of state and local governments to provide housing; and leverage private-sector participation.” HOME funds also have a minimum 15% funding restriction that is dedicated to Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs), and an Administration cap of 10%. The City of Victorville and the Town of Apple Valley have established a consortium in order to meet the population threshold for HOME entitlement status. Pursuant to HUD’s 2022 HOME Consortia Participating Members Percentage Report, Victorville’s funds will be distributed as follows:
•Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) - $86,170 (Required 15% minimum of HOME Allocaiton)
•Construction/Other Projects - $430,847 (75% of HOME Allocation) •Administration - $57,446 (Maximum 10% of HOME Allocaiton – Victorville splits the administration funds with Apple Valley serving as the Lead Agency for HOME, with Victorville retaining $28,723 (50%) of the administrative funds)
TOTAL - $574,463 (2023-2024 estimated HOME Allocation)
In addition, the HOME Program requires that federal HOME funds be matched 25% with non-federal forms of subsidy. Unless HUD waives the local match requirement, the applicant will be responsible for providing match contributions.
As of the current fiscal year, the Apple Valley/Victorville Consortium has been deemed fiscally distressed by HUD and this matching fund requirement has been waived as it has been in previous funding cycles.
APPLICATIONS, PROJECT TYPES AND FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. Applications
The deadline to submit applications for FY 2022-2023 funding was January 20, 2023 from non-profit agencies and City departments. Staff has begun evaluating the applications to determine eligibility using the federal CDBG and HOME criteria. 2 9
8 6
2. Project Types
Public Service Projects are defined by the population they serve and may only be funded by CDBG. Most public service projects are determined to be eligible based on the federal guidelines that presume certain groups are eligible, such as the homeless, victims of domestic violence, senior adults, certain at-risk groups such as the unemployed and youth, and low/moderate income families. CDBG regulations place a 15% cap on funds that can be allocated to Public Service Projects. Staff anticipates a total of $203,846 will be available to fund projects defined as Public Service Projects in the upcoming 2023-2024 program year.
Construction and Other Community Development Projects are generally limited by their location and are funded with CDBG. A target area map determined by the 2020 census defines those areas where there exists a concentrated portion of the low and moderate-income population, or an area severely affected by blight. A map of the City's current CDBG targeted areas has been included with this agenda item as Attachment D. A project is eligible under this funding type when it demonstrates that the immediate or target area benefits from the project or activity.
During the subject program year approximately $883,331 is available to fund projects defined as Construction and Other Community Development Projects.
Housing Projects may also be funded from this category.
Housing Projects may be funded with either CDBG or HOME funds. CDBG regulations limit housing activities to “providing or improving permanent residential structures which, upon completion will be occupied by low and moderate-income persons”. HOME regulations are designed to provide affordable housing to low and very-low-income households. HUD requires a minimum of 15% of the total HOME allocation to be reserved for CHDO activities. Approximately $430,847 in HOME funds is currently available to fund non-CHDO housing projects. Housing Projects may also be funded utilizing the $883,331 in CDBG funds from the Construction and Other Community Development Projects category listed above.
3. Funding Considerations
Funding caps are established by statute for administration (CDBG - 20% and HOME – 10% maximum of the total grant award), public service projects (CDBG - 15% maximum of the total grant award) and CHDO projects (HOME – 15% minimum). Although these fundings limits were previously waived in conjunction with assciated but separate CDBG-CV funds (CDBG CARES Act funding in repsonse to the coronavirus pandemic), such waivers are not applicable to the subject CDBG & HOME funds being discussed.
A. Council Policy
On November 15, 1994 (amended April 4, 1995, May 1998 and January 15, 2019), the City Council adopted a policy that established guidelines for determining CDBG/HOME program and project priority. The policy states that Council is tasked with the responsibility of determining program and 2 9
8 6
project priority as well as allocating funds during the fiscal year in which grant funds are available. In order to facilitate the annual allocation of funds, the City Council designates two members of the Council to serve on the CPD Grants Subcommittee. Currently, Mayor Jones and Mayor Pro Tem Becerra are appointed to serve on the CPD Grants Subcommittee, which will make recommendations to the City Council for formal review and approval in conjunction with the Annual Action Plan.
B. Religious Organizations
The White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships was established by former President George W. Bush through executive order on January 29, 2001. The initiative sought to strengthen faith-based and community organizations and expand their capacity to provide federally funded social services. HUD revised its regulations to remove barriers to the participation of faith-based organizations in HUD programs. In general, no group of applicants competing for HUD funds should be subject to greater or fewer requirements than other organizations solely because of their religious character or affiliation. However, HUD does require that organizations clearly delineate eligible and ineligible uses of funds. HUD’s final rule stipulates that a recipient organization may not use direct HUD funds to support inherently religious activities, such as prayer, worship, religious instruction, or proselytization.
C. Fair Housing
Affirmatively furthering fair housing is a legal requirement that federal grantees advance the purposes of the Fair Housing Act of 1968. There are no requirements for minimum funding levels, or funding caps for this activity.
The City’s responsibilities include identifying barriers to fair housing and taking appropriate actions to overcome the effects of those barriers. This activity is generally contracted to organizations that principally offer fair housing services as well as landlord/tenant mediation, such as Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board. Additionally, included in the 2022-2026 ConPlan is an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, which along with the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Plan adopted in conjunction with the City’s 6th Cycle Housing Element will be incorporated into the Annual Action Plan by ensuring compliance with applicable goals.
CPD Grants Subcommittee and Allocation of Funds:
The CPD Grants Subcommittee will work with staff to review applications and provide their funding recommendations prior to the adoption of the 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan.
It is anticipated that the City Council will award grant amounts as part of the adoption of the Annual Action Plan during a public meeting anticipated to occur in April 2023. 2 9
8 6
Staff is available to answer questions as needed.
Attachments:
Attachment A – 2022-2026 ConPlan
Attachment B – Citizen Participation Plan
Attachment C – 2022-2023 CDBG/HOME Allocations
Attachment D – CDBG Target Area Map
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT A
2022-2026 Consolidated Plan
Draft Consolidated Plan
2022-2026
Draft Annual Action Plan
FY 2022– 2026
This page is intentionally left blank.
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Debra Jones
Mayor
Leslie Irving
Mayor Pro Tem
Elizabeth Becerra
Council Member
Blanca Gomez
Council Member
This page is intentionally left blank.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .........................................................2 ES-05 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 2 The Process ........................................................................ 9 PR-05 Lead & responsible agencies ......................................................................................................9 Needs Assessment ........................................................ 43 NA-05 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 43 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment ..................................................................................................... 45 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs ....................................................... 54 Housing Market Analysis ............................................ 62 MA-05 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 62 MA-10 Number of Housing Units ......................................................................................................... 67 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing ..................................................................... 72 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets ....................................................... 76 MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households ........................................................................................................................................................ 85 MA-65 Hazard Mitigation, Victorville ................................................................................................. 87 Strategic Plan .................................................................. 89 SP-05 Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 89 SP-10 Geographic Priorities ...................................................................................................................... 91 SP-25 Priority Needs ..................................................................................................................................... 92 SP-35 Anticipated Resources ................................................................................................................. 98 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure ............................................................................................. 101 DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE ii
SP-45 Goals Summary .............................................................................................................................. 105 SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards ....................................................................................................... 107 SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy ................................................................................................................. 109 SP-80 Monitoring ........................................................................................................................................... 111 2022-2023 Action Plan .................................................113 AP-15 Expected Resources ...................................................................................................................... 113 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................. 115 AP-35 Projects ................................................................................................................................................. 117 AP-38 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................... 119 AP-50 Geographic Distribution ........................................................................................................... 129 AP-85 Other Actions................................................................................................................................... 130 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements .........................................................................................133
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 2
Executive Summary
ES-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
The City of Victorville is a growing and vibrant community conveniently located between Los Angeles and Las Vegas. Incorporated in 1962, the City has grown from 8,110 residents in an area of 9.7 acres to over 128,000 residents in 74.16 acres. The City has long been part of essential transportation corridors, including Route 66 and Interstate 15. Pride of place is evident in the clean air, mountain vistas and big skies, and pride of people is evident in the strong entrepreneurial spirit, and commitment to neighbors through volunteerism. Victorville has evolved and experienced significant growth in population and economic activity in the last 60 years.
The City of Victorville prepared the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, with select analyses required to receive federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The Consolidated Plan provides the U nited States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) with a comprehensive assessment of the City’s housing and community development needs and outlines the City’s priorities, objectives, and strategies for the investment of CDBG and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) Consortium funds to address these needs over the next five years, beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2027.
The City of Victorville and the Town of Apple have formed the Apple Valley-Victorville Consortium. Thi s strategy enables the City and Town to access HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) funds and make more affordable housing resources available to residents. Apple Valley serves as the lead agency for coordinating the Co nsortium’s Consolidated Planning process and submission. Each jurisdiction is responsible for administering its own CDBG program, while the Town of Apple Valley administers the HOME program for both jurisdictions. HOME objectives and goals are determined by both jurisdictions through an extensive analysis of housing needs for low er income residents, as specified by the program regulations. Each jurisdiction is also responsible for preparing its own Annual Action Plan and Consolidated Annual Perf ormance Evaluation Report (CAPER).
The City and Consortium receive CDBG and HOME funds from HUD on a formula basis each year, and in turn, awards grants and loans to nonprofit, for -profit, public organizations, and residents for programs and projects in fu rtherance of this Plan.
These programs provide for a wide range of eligible activities to address the needs of Victorville residents.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 3
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 created the CDBG Program with three primary objectives against which HUD evaluates the Consolidated Plan and the City’s performance. Those primary objectives are decent housing, suitable living environments, and expanded economic opportunities for low - and moderate- income persons. The CDBG regulations require each activity meet one of the following national objectives:
• Benefit low- and moderate-income persons; or
• Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or • Meet other community development needs having a particular urge ncy (usually the result of a natural disaster).
HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME)
The Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act of 1990 created the HOME program to expand the supply of affordable housing for low - and moderate-income households. Often used in partnership with local nonprofit housing development organizations, the HOME program can support a wide range of affordable housing activities, including building, buying, and/or rehabilitating rental and housing ownership to low- and moderate-income people. Additionally, HOME funds are used to fund the City’s Senior Home Repair Program.
For the 2022 -2023 Program Year, it is es timated the City will receive $ 1,447,740 of CDBG funds and it is estimated the Consortium will receive $783,168 in HOME funds.
When combined with available prior year resources, the 202 2-2023 Action Plan allocates $1,683,386 of CDBG funds, and $538,967 of HOME funds to program activities listed below that will be implemented from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023.
2022-2023 CDBG Public Service Activities
Assistance League of Victor Valley: Operation School Bell $23,639 Child Advocates of San Bernardino County $10,000
Family Assistance Program $11,820
Greater Hope Foundation for Children $19,699
High Desert Homeless Services $31,515
Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board $28,000
Millionaire Mind Kids $10,000
Moses House Ministries $20,369
Partners Against Violence $15,760
Rock'n Our Disabilities Foundation $22,720
Victor Valley Domestic Violence $23,639
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 4
2022-2023 CDBG & HOME Capital Activities
High Desert Homeless Services $300,000
Route 66 Victor Valley Revitalization $150,000
Victor Valley Community Services Council $34,000
City of Victorville – Blight Abatement $104,000
City of Victorville – Code Enforcement $250,000
City of Victorville – Demolition $175,145.72
City of Victorville – Planning: Residential Rehabilitation Program $200,000 City of Victorville – Public Works – Graffiti Abatement *$0.00 City of Victorville – Planning – Senior Home Repair Program (HOME) $131,561 Hughes Training and Development (HOME) $272,665
* Program will be funded up to requested $12,500 in surplus allocation of funds 2022-2023 Program Administration Activities
CDBG Program Administration $289,548
HOME Program Administration $26,948
Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan needs assessment Overview
The priority needs and goals identified in the Plan are based on analysis of information including the results of the City’s Resident and Stakeholder Surveys and the housing and community development data elements required by HUD in the online Consolidated Plan system (eCon Planning Suite). Data supplied by HUD includes the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the same period .
Other sources of information used to identify needs and establish priorities were obtained through consultation with local nonprofit agencies and cited publicly available data.
In consideration of community input and available data, the five priority needs listed below are established as part of this Plan:
• Supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness • Human services
• Housing programs
• Accessibility and mobility
• Economic Development
Consistent with HUD’s national goals for the CDBG and HOME programs to provide decent housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low - and moderate-income residents, the priority needs listed above will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 5
activities aligned with the following measurable goals included in the Strategic Plan section of this Plan:
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 6
Goal Name Category Need(s) Addressed Goal Outcome
Indicator
1. Provide suitable
living
environments for
residents
- Affordable
Housing
Homeless
- Non-Homeless
Special Needs
- Non-Housing
Community
Development
- Supportive services
for the homeless and
those at risk of
homelessness
- Human services
Public service
activities for low/
moderate income
housing benefit:
17,490 people, 2,500
households, 135
structures
2. Decent and
affordable
housing for
consortia
residents
Affordable
Housing
Housing programs Homeowner
housing
rehabilitation: 300
household housing
units
3. Expand access to
essential services
and amenities
Non-housing
community
development
Accessibility and
mobility
Economic
Development
Public Facility of
Infrastructure other
than Low /
Moderate-Income
Housing Benefit:
500 people
Businesses – 10
business
Table 1 - Strategic Plan Summary
Evaluation of past performance
The investment of HUD resources during the 201 7-2021 Program Years resulted in measurable accomplishments that contributed to positive outcomes for Victorville residents. Together with other federal, state and local investments, HUD resources allowed the City of Victorville and its partners to:
• Preserve and improve the existing housing stock.
• Provide fair housing services.
• Provide quality supportive services to elderly residents and those with disabilities.
• Provide support services such as battered and abused spousal programs and referral and case management services to people with special needs. • Contribute to the well -being of individuals, families, and neighborhoods by providing a wide array of public services to Victorville residents; and • Support a continuum of services in support of City and County efforts to end homelessness.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 7
There were some delays to construction projects toward the end of the five-year cycle due to the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). To limit spread of COVID-19 and protect City staff and residents from the virus in person interactions were suspended limiting the City’s ability to conduct job walks or enter construction contracts. Construction projects resumed in 2021-2022.
Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The Consolidated Plan regulations at 24 CFR Part 91 provide the citizen participation and consultation requirements for the development of the Consolidated Plan. Chief among those requirements is the need to consult with the Continuum of Care (CoC) to address homelessness , Public Housing Authorities (PHA), business leaders, civic leaders and public or private agencies that address housing, health, social service, victim services, employment, or education needs of low -income individuals and families, homeless individuals an d families, youth and/or other persons with special needs. Information supplied by these community stakeholders, together with the data supplied by HUD resulted in a well -informed planning document that reflects the housing, community and economic development needs and priorities for the City of Victorville over the next five years.
From October 2021 through April 2022, the City’s Planning Department held a community meeting, two public hearings, a public meeting, focus groups and surveys to afford citizens and local and regional organizations representing low - and moderate-income residents the maximum feasible opportunity to provide input on the housing and community development needs of the City. The resident and stakeholder surveys solicited input from re sidents and employees working in Victorville. The questionnaire polled respondents about the level of need in thei r experience for various types of improvements that could potentially be addressed with CDBG and HOME resources. The focus groups were organized by interest group:
food banks and homeless services; youth and education services; public servicers; veterans, elderly and disables services; and faith-based organizations. The community meetings and were publicly noticed.
Summary of public comments
A community meeting and two public hearing were held to receive comments on the housing and community development needs. The community meeting was held on November 17, 2021, at 10 am and 6 pm. The public hearings were held on February 15, 2022, and April 19, 2022 at 6 pm Participants were encouraged to join remotely via the video conferencing application Zoom.
A public meeting to discuss applications received in response to the City’s Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 2022-2023 CDBG funds was held before the Victorville Community Development and Planning Grants Subcommittee on March 3, 2022.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 8
The City of Victorville received two written comments and 12 participants spoke at the February 15 public hearing. All comments were accepted and entered into the record.
A summary of these comments may be found in Appendix B.
Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them
All comments and views received by the City in the development of the Consolidated Plan were accepted and taken into consideration in the development of the Consolidated Plan.
Summary
Examination of 201 3-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, in addition to local data, as well as consultation with citizens and stakeholders revealed five high priority needs to be addressed through the investment of an anticipated $ 7.1 million of CDBG and $3.9 million HOME Consortium funds over the five -year period of the Consolidated Plan. The investment of CDBG and HOME funds in eligible activities shall be guided principally by the three goals of the Strategic Plan. Activities submitted for consideration in response to any solicitation or Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) process must conform with one of the four Strategic Plan strategies and the associated action-oriented, measurable goals to receive consideration for CDBG or HOME Consortium funding.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 9
The Process
PR-05 LEAD & RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES
1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source
The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.
Agency Role Name Department/Agency
CDBG Administrator VICTORVILLE Planning Development
HOME Administration –
Lead Agency
Apple Valley Housing & Community
Development
HOME Administration –
Participating Jurisdiction
Victorville Planning Department
Table 2– Responsible Agencies
Narrative
The 2022-2026 Consolidate Plan for the Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium and the City of Victorville was prepared by MDG Associates, Inc. under contract to the respective jurisdictions. The Town of Apple Valley serves as the lead agency for coordinating the Consolidated Planning and submission process and administers the HOME program for both jurisdictions. The City of Victorville is a participating jurisdiction in the Consortium. The City’s Planning Department is the lead agency responsible for administering its CDBG program and shall be responsible for all grants planning, management, and monitoring duties necessary to comply with HUD regulations and City policy throughout the implementation of the Consolidated Plan and each of the five Annual Action Plans and Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPER).
In the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City implemented a comprehensive citizen participation and consultation process and conducted a needs assessment and market analysis to ide ntify levels of relative need regarding affordable housing, homelessness, special needs, and community development. This information was gathered through consultation with public officials and local agencies, public outreach and community meetings, review of demographic and economic data, and housing market analysis.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 10
Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
Alejandro Jauregui, Senior Planner
City of Victorville
Planning Department
14343 Civic Drive, Victorville, CA 92392
(760) 955-5132
Orlando Acevedo, Director
Town of Apple Valley
Business Development and Communications
14955 Dale Evans Parkway, Apple Valley, CA 92307
(760) 240-7915
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 11
PR-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(l) and 91.315(l)
1. Introduction
In the preparation of the Consolidated Plan, the City consulted with public and private departments and agencies and social service and non- profit organizati ons to understand the community’s needs and available resources. The City met with several department representatives to provide information about the Consolidated Plan and its processes. Department staff provided input on how CDBG resources could be used and leveraged to provide services. Focus group participants highlighted the priority needs in general terms and specific to the population.
Other jurisdictions within the region were contacted and consulted, including the Town of Apple Valley. As the HOME Consortium lead agency, the Town of Apple Valley held joint community meetings as well as strategy sessions to determine priority use of HOME funding over the next 5 years. During the joint consultation process, the Consortium provided detailed informat ion about the Con solidate Plan and HOME program, the Consortiums distribution of funds and current projects using HOME funds.
The City of Victorville recognizes Victorville residents are the center of and partners in the development of the Consolidated Plan. The Citizen Participation Plan establishes a means by which citizens, public agencies and other interested parties can actively participate in the development of the Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plan and the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report.
Opportunities to participate in the planning process were provided throughout.
Special effort was made to engage low-income persons. City efforts to make opportunities for engagement known include:
• Public notices printed in the local newspaper in English and Spanish. • Public notices posted on the City’s website in English and Spanish. • Public notices posted at community facilities including library in English and Spanish.
• Web-based surveys links were shared widely through the City’s social media accounts and blast and direct email and hard copies were available at the City Planning Department.
• Stakeholder meetings were targeted to specific groups; especially those of people with disabilities, disadvantaged youths, homeless people.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 12
Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(I)).
The City recognizes the importance of careful coor dination and alignment among various service providers to maximize the effectiveness of the CDBG program. As a result, during the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City consulted with organizations that provide assisted housing, health services and other community - focused programs. Outreach efforts included surveys, invitations to community meetings, and follow-up in-person interviews where appropriate.
The City further recognizes the importance of continued coordination and alignment during the upcoming five -year planning period with these organizations and agencies. The City will reinforce these partnerships through the implementation of the NOFA process for CDBG funds each year and through technical assistance provided to subrecipients.
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness To help prevent homelessness and protect at- risk populations the City supports and participates in the San Bernardino County Continuum of Care System and the San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership. The City plans to fund CoC member, High Desert Homeless Ser vices, over the 5 -year planning period to assist in efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness.
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS
The City is not a direct recipient of ESG funding. However, it is a participating jurisdiction in the CoC and works closely with the homeless provider system to create funding policies and procedures for ESG.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 13
2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities 1 Agency/Group/Organization Rock’n Our Disabilities
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services - Disabilities
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included consultation
with Consortium residents, service providers and
selected department s from each member
jurisdiction. Engagement was conducted through
surveys, community meetings and focus group
interviews.
2 Agency/Group/Organization Orenda Foundation's Veterans Project Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services - Homeless Veterans
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Economic Development
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included consultation
with Consortium residents, service providers and
selected departments from each member
jurisdiction. Fo cus groups were conducted with
nearly 30 organizations representing special needs
populations, affordable housing and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews were
also conducted A complete list of organizations is
provided as an attachment.
3 Agency/Group/Organization Victor Valley Family Resource Center Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 14
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Consolidated Plan process included consultation
with Consortium residents, service providers and
selected departments from each member
jurisdiction. Engagement was con ducted through
surveys, community meetings and focus group
interviews.
4 Agency/Group/Organization City of Victorville
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted an
d what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included consultation
with Consortium residents , service providers and
selected departments from each member
jurisdiction. Focus groups were conducted with
nearly 30 organizations representing special needs
populations, affordable housing,
and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews were
also conducted A complete list of organizations is
provided as an attachment.
5 Agency/Group/Organization High Desert Second Chance Food Bank Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 15
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the needs
and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included consultation
with Consortium residents, service providers and
selected departments from each member
jurisdiction. Engagement was con ducted through
surveys, community meetings and focus group
interviews.
6 Agency/Group/Organization A Better Way
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Victims of Domestic Violence
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
In order to obtain a comprehensive assessment
of the needs and priorities within the
community, the Consolidated Plan process
included consultation with Consortium
residents, service providers and selected
departments from each member jurisdiction.
Focus groups were conducted with nearly 30
organizations representing special needs
populations, affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
7 Agency/Group/Organization City of Victorville
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Planning Organization
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 16
How was th e
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process include d
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
8 Agency/Group/Organization Inland SoCal 211+ (United Way) Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
10 Agency/Group/Organization Apple Valley PAL
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Children
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 17
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
11 Agency/Group/Organization Catholic Charities - San Bernardino Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Housing
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
12 Agency/Group/Organization Legal Aid of San Bernardino Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Fair Housing
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 18
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
13 Agency/Group/Organization Western University
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Mental Health Agency/Facility
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
14 Agency/Group/Organization No Drugs America
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Children
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 19
15 Agency/Group/Organization Assistance League of Victor Valley Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Children
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
17 Agency/Group/Organization Inland SoCal United Way
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Elderly
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive asses sment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, commu nity
meetings and focus group interviews.
18 Agency/Group/Organization A Greater Hope
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Foster Care Agency/Facility
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
To obtain a comprehen sive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 20
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with near ly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
19 Agency/Group/Organization Combat Veteran Motorcycle Association Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services - Homeless Veterans
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
20 Agency/Group/Organization Inland SoCal United Way
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Children
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan proce ss included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 21
development. Key one -one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
21 Agency/Group/Organization APPLE VALLEY
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Other government - Local
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
22 Agency/Group/Organization A Core Solution
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Housing
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special n eeds populations,
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 22
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
24 Agency/Group/Organization High Desert Community Foundation Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Business Leader, Financial backer
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one -one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
25 Agency/Group/Organization Set Free Church
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Faith-based Organization
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 23
26 Agency/Group/Organization Lutheran Social Services of So Cal Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
27 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Housing & Mediation Board Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Fair Housing
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
28 Agency/Group/Organization Family Assistance Program
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Disabilities; Services-Homeless
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 24
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
29 Agency/Group/Organization Moses House Ministries
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Employment; Services-children under
5 What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
30 Agency/Group/Organization Victor Valley Community Services Council Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Elderly; Services-Disabilities
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Non-Homeless Special Needs
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 25
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one -one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
31 Agency/Group/Organization TOAV Park and Recreation
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Children
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagemen t was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
32 Agency/Group/Organization St. John of God Health Care Services Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 26
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
33 Agency/Group/Organization Feed My Sheep
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Homeless; Other
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
34 Agency/Group/Organization High Desert Homeless Services Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Hmls/Formerly Hmls Resident (ESG Grantees);
Services - Homeless Veterans
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
In order to obtain a comprehensive assessment
of the needs and priorities within the
community, the Consolidated Plan process
included consultation with Consortium
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 27
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
residents, service providers and selected
departments from each member jur isdiction.
Focus groups were conducted with nearly 30
organizations representing special needs
populations, affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
36 Agency/Group/Organization Greater Hope Foundation for Children Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Child Welfare Agency
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
37 Agency/Group/Organization Spectrum/ Charter Communications Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Broadband ISP
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 28
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
38 Agency/Group/Organization San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Continuum of Care; Regional Organization
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one inte rviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
39 Agency/Group/Organization City of Victorville
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Emergency Management Agency; Local
Government
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensi ve assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through survey s, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 29
40 Agency/Group/Organization Department of Housing and Urban Development
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Federal Government
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Economic Development
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing specia l needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
41 Agency/Group/Organization City of Victorville
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Floodplain Management Agency; Water
District/Agency
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted through surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
42 Agency/Group/Organization Housing Authority County of San Bernardino Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Public Housing Authority
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 30
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one -one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
43 Agency/Group/Organization Victor Valley Global Medical Center Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-Health; Health Agency
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted thr ough surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
44 Agency/Group/Organization Foothill AIDS Project
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Services-HIV/AIDS
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan proce ss included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 31
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
45 Agency/Group/Organization High Desert Detention Center Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Public Funded Institution
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted thr ough surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
46 Agency/Group/Organization BLM, Barstow Field Office
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Public Land Agency
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 32
47 Agency/Group/Organization Coachella Valley Housing Coalition Agency/Group/Organization
Type
Housing
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a co mprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Engagement was
conducted throu gh surveys, community
meetings and focus group interviews.
48 Agency/Group/Organization CA HCD
Agency/Group/Organization
Type
State Government
What section of the Plan
was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for
improved coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive assessment of the
needs and priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with Consortium residents, service
providers and selected departments from each
member jurisdiction. Focus groups were
conducted with nearly 30 organizations
representing special needs populations,
affordable housing, and economic
development. Key one- one-one interviews
were also conducted A complete list of
organizations is provided as an attachment.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 33
Table 3– Agencies, groups, organizations who participated Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting
No agency type was excluded from the final stakeholder list.
Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan
Name of
Plan
Lead
Organization
How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with
the goals of each plan?
Continuum
of Care
County of San
Bernardino
The County of San Bernardino is a Continuum of Care
applicant and conducts homeless counts, surveys of the
homeless population, and strategic planning to end
homelessness. Consistent with the goals of the CoC, the City of Victorville’s Strategic Plan will provide support to nonprofits that meet the social services needs of the City residents with an emphasis on the homeless.
Housing
Elements
City of Victorville
/ Town of Apple
Valley
Based on the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
set forth by the State of California, The Housing Element is the City's chief policy document for the development of affordable and market rate housing. Consistent with this policy document, the City will maintain and enhance the quality of existing residential ne ighborhoods and
promote and encourage fair housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community, regardless of age,
sex, ethnic background, physical condition, or family size.
Table 4– Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(l)) As a Consortium, the Town of Apple Valley and the City of Victorville coordinate housing and community development strategies among the jurisdictions. The Consortium and City collaborate with State and local agencies such as jurisdictions in the San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership (S BCHP); t he California Department of Housing and Community Development regarding the periodic update of the Housing Elements ; and neighboring jurisdictions and the County for any partnering opportunities to address housing and community development needs in the region.
The City’s collaborative and cooperative planning partnerships with governmental, nonprofit, and private entities strategically ensure the needs of low - and moderate-
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 34
income needs are meet, issues are comprehensively evaluated and thoroughly addressed. Aside from these partnerships, other departments within the City are involved in collaborating and cooperating with state and federal entities in planning efforts.
PR-15 Citizen Participation - 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c)
1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation
Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal setting In preparation for the Consolidated Plan the City followed the established processes of the Citi zen Participation Plan to ensure broad community engagement . At each step the City worked to ensur e low- and moderate-income residents, members of minority groups, agencies involved in the provision of services to these populations, and others who are dire ctly impacted by the programs and activities supported by the Consolidated Plan programs had the opportunity to be actively involved. The Citizen Participation Plan, Consolidated Plan, Action Plan, C onsolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (C APER) and the Assessment of Fair Housing Choice are posted on the City website at:
https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/city-
departments/development/planning/grant-programs/2022-2027-consolidated-plan and a hard copy will be available for review in the City Planning Department for 30 days from March 21 to April 19, 2022.
To assist in identification of priority needs citizens were engaged through community meetings, surveys, public hearings, and individual meetings. Citizens wh o participated in the process received extensive information about the Consolidated Plan, citizen participation process, HUD requirements for an entitlement City, the amount of funding the City anticipates receiving and how those funds can be used by the City. Residents were given the opportunity to provide City staff with their input on the prioritization of community needs. Each of these efforts, including review of HUD Data and relevant policy documents, assisted the City in its goal setting efforts.
Two publicly noticed meetings were held at different stages in the development of the Consolidated Plan. The community meeting on November 17, 2021, and the public hearing February 15, 2022. Twelve residents spoke at the February meeting and two written comments were received. All comments were accepted and entered into the record. A summary of these comments may be found in Appendix B.
In November 2021, the City opened surveys to afford citizens and local and regional organizations representing low -and-moderate income persons the maximum feasible opportunity to provide input on housing and community development needs
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 35
of the City. The surveys solicited input from residents and employees working in Victorville. The questionnaire polled respondents about the level of need in their neighborhoods for various types of improvements which could potentially be addressed using federal funds, such as CDBG and HOME allocations. The electronic survey was made available on the City’s website and across its social media platforms.
It was also made available in hard copy at the City’s Planning Department. The survey was available in English and in Spanish, as recommended in the Citizen Participation Plan. The resident survey received 25 responses and the stakeholder survey received four responses.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 36
Citizen Participation Outreach
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If applicable)
1 Newspape
r Ad
Non-targeted/
broad
community
English
Speaking
Non-English
Speaking -
Specify other
language:
Spanish
Newspaper ad
published
November 5,
2021, in the
Daily Press
announcing
two
Community
Meetings to
receive input
on the
preparation of
the City's 2022-
2026
Consolidated
Plan and the
2022-2023
Action Plan.
No
comments
were
received.
No
comments
were
received.
Not applicable.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 37
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If applicable)
2 Public
Meeting
Non-targeted/
broad
community
Publicly
noticed
Community
Meeting on
November 15,
2021 at 10:00
a.m. and 6:00
p.m. at the
Victorville
Activity Center,
15075 Hesperia
Road,
Victorville, CA
92395
Residents in
attendance
received a
presentatio
n on the
Consolidate
d Plan and
discussed
housing and
community
developmen
t needs with
City Staff.
All
comments
were
accepted.
Not applicable.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 38
4 Internet
Outreach
Non-
targeted/broa
d community
The Resident
Survey was
available online
and in paper
format at the
Planning
Department
from
November 17 to
January 14,
2022. The City
advised
residents and
stakeholders of
the availability
of the survey via
email to
stakeholders,
posting on the
City websi te,
Facebook,
Twitter,
announcement
s at City Council
meetings, and
during the
Community
Meetings.
The purpose
of the survey
was to allow
all residents
the
opportunity
to provide
their
assessment
of the level
of need in
Victorville
for a variety
of housing ,
community,
and
economic
developmen
t activities.
In total, 25
residents
completed
the survey. A
summary of
all survey
responses is
provided in
Appendix B.
All survey
responses
were
accepted.
https://forms.office.com/r/x6XvJ4c1dr
5 Newspape
r Ad
Non-targeted/
broad
community
Newspaper ad
published
February 4,
2022 in the
Daily Press
No public
comments
were
received.
No
comments
were
received.
https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/agend
as/-fsiteid-1
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 39
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If applicable)
English
Speaking
Non-English
Speaking -
Specify other
language:
Spanish
announcing
Public Hearing
to receive input
on the
preparation of
the City's 2022-
2026
Consolidated
Plan and the
2022-2023
Action Plan.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 40
6 Public
Hearing
Non-
targeted/broa
d community
A public
hearing was
held before the
Victorville City
Council on
February 15,
2022, in the
Victorville City
Council
Chamber and
live via Zoom to
receive input
on the highest
priority
housing,
community
and economic
development
needs in
Victorville. This
meeting took
place prior to
the publication
of the draft
2022-2026
Consolidated
Plan
for public
review and
comment.
12 verbal
and two
written
comments
were
delivered. 11
comments
were in
support of
CDBG
public
services
application
submitted
and one was
identifying
the need for
affordable
housing.
Not
applicable.
All
comments
were
accepted.
Not applicable.
7 Newspape
r Ad
Non-targeted/
broad
community
Newspaper ad
published on
March 21 2022
in the Daily
Press
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 41
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If applicable)
English
Speaking
Non-English
Speaking -
Specify other
language:
Spanish
announcing
the availability
of the draft
2022-2026
Consolidated
Plan, draft
2022-2023
Annual Action
Plan, and draft
Victorville
Analysis of
Impediments,
of Fair Housing
Choice for a 30-
day public
review and
comment
period to
include a
public hearing
before the
Victorville City
Council on
April 19, 2020.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 42
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL (If applicable)
8 Public
Hearing
Non-
targeted/broa
d community
Public hearing
before the
Victorville City
Council on April
19, 2022, to
receive
comments on
the draft 2022-
2026
Consolidated
Plan, draft
2022-2023
Annual Action
Plan, and draft
Victorville
Analysis of
Impediments
to Fair Housing
Choiceprior to
adoption an d
submission to
HUD.
To be
determined
.
To be
determine
d
https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/agend
as/-fsiteid-1
Table 5– Citizen Participation Outreach
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 43
Needs Assessment
NA-05 OVERVIEW
Needs Assessment Overview
The Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment examines housing, homelessness, non - homeless special needs, and non- housing community development needs. The housing needs assessment section evaluates household income, tenure (renter or owner), housing cost as a function of household income, disproportionate need amongst racial and ethnic groups and public housing needs. The homeless needs assessment examines the sheltered and unsheltered homeless population in San Bernardino County to inform Apple Valley -Victorville’s strategy to address homelessness during the next five years. The non-homeless special needs assessment section evaluates the needs of people who are not homeless, but due to various reasons need services. This population includes elderly, frail elderly, severe mentally ill, developmentally disabled, and physically disabled persons, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS, victims of human trafficking, persons with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and victims of domestic violence. The non- housing community development needs assessment section discusses the need for public facilities, public infrastructure improvements and public services to benefit low- and moderate-income residents.
Methodology
To assess community needs, the Town of Apple Valley and City of Victorville examined data, held community meetings and focus groups, conducted a survey of residents and stakeholders, and consulted with experts and local stakeholders. The Needs Assessment primarily relies on the following sources of data:
• American Community Survey (ACS), 2013-2017, 5-year estimates • Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), 2013 -2017, 5 -year estimates
• 2020 Point-In-Time Homeless Count
The 2013-2017 ACS 5-year estimates and the 2013-2017, 5-year estimates were the most recent available complete datasets supplied through the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Con Planning Suite planning framework.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 44
Consolidated Plan Focus Groups and Surveys for Residents and Stakeholders
The Apple Valley- Victorville Consortium held five virtual focus groups over the period of three days in mid -December 2021. The focus groups were promoted by the cities and facilitated by MDG. The five groups were as follows:
1. Food Banks and Homeless Services,
2. Education and Youth Services,
3. Public Services,
4. Veterans, Elderly and Disabled Services, and
5. Faith Based Organizations.
Some organizations participated in multiple focus groups because they serve multiple constituencies. In total, 29 unique people participated in the focus groups, excluding the facilitator and organizers.
Apple Valley and Victorville residents and stakehol ders had the opportunity to respond to the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan survey to rate the need and/or to identify highest priority need for public facilities, infrastructure, and services, housing facilities and services, business services. The tabulation of survey results from the 111 Apple Valley and 25 Victorville residents and four community stakeholders who responded to the surveys are integrated throughout the Needs Assessment (NA) and Market Assessment (MA) of Consolidated Plan and can be found in the following sections:
• Housing facility and service results – NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment, • Public facility, infrastructure, and service results – NA-50 Non -Housing and Community Development Needs,
• Discrimination in housing results – MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing, • Business service results – MA-45,
• Internet access, cost, type, and speed – MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing Occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households, and
• Disaster preparedness results – MA-65 Hazard Mitigation.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 45
NA-10 HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Summary of Housing Needs
For the City of Victorville, the income levels are divided by different AMI levels corresponding with HUD income definitions as follows:
• 0-30 percent AMI: extremely low-income – just over 16 percent of all households; • 30-50 percent AMI: low-income – almost 15 percent of all households; • 50-80 percent AMI: moderate-income – just over 18 percent of all households; • 80-100 percent AMI: medium -income – approximately 10 percent of all households; and
• Greater than 10 0 percent AMI: upper- income – about 40 percent of all households.
The most common household type in Victorville is small family. About 49 percent of specific household types earn less than 80 percent AMI, with the highest rates of occurrence among households with one or more children 6 years of age or younger or 62 years of age or older.
Figure 1
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
According to ACS data in Table 6 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics - Victorville, Victorville’s population grew by 19 percent during the period between 2009 and 2017, increasing in number from 102,666 to 121,720 people. During this time, the number of households increased by 13 percent from 28,842 to 32,630 and the median
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 46
household income decreased from $51,372 to $47,895. According to the 2017 data, approximately 60 percent of all households in Victorville earn less than 100 percent of Area Median In come (AMI) and 49.3 percent of all households earn less than 80 percent of AMI.
Victorville
Demographics Base Year: 2009 Most Recent Year: 2017 % Change Population 102,666 121,720 19%
Households 28,842 32,639 13%
Median Income $51,372.00 $47,895.00 -7%
Table 6 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics - Victorville Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Base Year), 2013-2017 ACS (Most Recent Year) Table 7 - Total Households Table - Victorville – presents the number of different household types in Victorville for different levels of income. Small family households consist of two-to-four family members, while large family households have five or more persons.
Number of Households Table
Victorville
0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-100%
AMI
>100%
AMI
Total Households 5,365 4,840 5,890 3,350 13,185
Small Family Households
(2 – 4 people) 2,510 2,340 2,780 1,435 7,045
Large Family Households
(5 or more people) 745 850 1,220 900 2,870
Household contains at least
one person 62-74 years of age 765 1,185 1,240 595 2,825 Household contains at least
one-person age 75 or older 515 565 640 215 790
Households with one or more
children 6 years old or
younger
1,740 1,430 1,720 779 3,335
Table 7 - Total Households Table - Victorville
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 47
Figure 2: Households with extremely low-income and severe housing cost burden
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 48
Figure 3: Households with low-income and severe housing cost burden
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 49
Figure 4: Households with moderate income and severe housing cost burden
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 50
Figure 5: Population Asian alone (not Hispanic)
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 51
Figure 6: Population Black/ African American alone (not Hispanic)
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 52
Figure 7: Population Hispanic origin (any race)
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 53
Figure 8: Population White alone (not Hispanic)
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 54
NA-50 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NEEDS
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Facilities.
The City of Victorville was incorporated in 1962. It has grown from 8,110 residents in an area of 9.7 acres to over 128,000 residents in 74.16 acres. It has evolved and experienced significant growth in population and economic activity since incorporation. While new facilities and amenities continue to be added, older facilities require rehabilitation to address the changing needs of the community.
The City of Victorville has invested significan tly in community facilities. According to the City’s website, it provides a library, golf course, two activity, two community, and a sport center and 18 parks. Maintaining and expanding these amenities requires significant financial investment.
Responses to the Resident and Stakeholder Surveys and focus groups give insight into the needs and priorities of those who live and work in Victorville. Residents responded there is a high level of need and the highest priority for homeless facilities and youth centers. In focus groups private facilities offering youth and family programming, such as a YMCA, and a performing arts center were identified as needs.
CDBG public facility projects that meet CDBG eligibility requirements, align with a Strategic Plan goal and address a CDBG National Objective will be considered for funding in the five Annual Action Plans. The Strategic Plan includes a goal to improve public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low - and moderate-income people or those presumed under HUD reg ulations to be low - and moderate-income, such as elderly people and adults with disabilities . Some of the types of facilities and infrastructure that may require rehabilitation during the next five years include, but are not limited to community centers, senior centers, parks and recreational facilities.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 55
How were these needs determined?
The needs identified for public facilities were determined through Community Meetings, responses from the Consolidated Plan Survey and consultation with City officials. Over the next five years Victorville’s Strategic Plan will continue to prioritize additional or improved public facilities to enhance or maintain the high level of services and amenities available to residents.
Figure 9: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 56
Figure 10: Resident Survey
Figure 11: Stakeholder Survey
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Improvements.
Infrastructure such as streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, storm drains, sewers, driveway approaches, pedestrian crossing, and streetlights in CDBD target areas or to support a project that benefits an identifiable segment of the population comprised of low - and moderate-income residents or residents presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income must be developed and maintained. Infrastructure improvements are included as part of the Strategic Plan goal concerning City of Victorville Public Facilities Improvements should the need arise to modify existing infrastructure or install new infrastructure.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 57
Responses to the Resident Survey show public infrastructure improvements to streets/ alleys, drainage, and high-speed internet infrastructure represent the greatest combined high and moderate levels of need. The highest priority infrastructure improvements are high- speed internet, street lighting, street/ alley improvements and tree planting.
How were these needs determined?
The needs identified fo r public infrastructure improvements were determined in consultation with the City and Town residents, City of Victorville Public Works Departments, Community Services Departments, and affordable housing developers.
Figure 12: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 58
Figure 13: Resident Survey
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services.
1. Those in need of public services are diverse and numerous. The homeless and non-homeless special needs populations are described in the Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment sections 40 and 45. Focus group s with nonprofit service providers shed light on the current and daily challenges faced by homeless and non- homeless special needs populations in Apple Valley and Victorville. Most focus group participants believed the priority needs facing their community are as follows:Supportive services for the homeless and those as risk of homelessness,
2. Human services, and
3. Accessibility and mobility.
Participants shared the types of prog ramming they believed would most effectively address those needs as well as the gaps in homeless and youth services delivery systems. A handful of programming areas were identified across the focus groups.
Those areas are as follows:
1. Mental and behavioral health services, especially for children
2. Community support for youth and families in the form of youth programming, in the arts, the consequences of underage substance use, and positive attitudes and behaviors to prevent violence
3. Transportation, including paved roads and sidewalks and electric bike share
4. Education on public services and changing eligibility, service providers and resources available to service providers. Throughout the focus groups there was a recurring theme around the need for centralizat ion and formalization of networks.
The input from the focus groups is supported by the resident and stakeholder survey results. The top three highly and moderately needed public services and highest priority public services as indicated in the Resident Su rvey are the same: homeless,
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 59
mental health, and youth services. Mental health services and homeless emergency shelter were identified as the top two highest needed public services by the stakeholder survey.
How were these needs determined?
Public service needs are driven by the City’s desire to ensure high quality services are provided to maintain residents’ quality of life and to promote the well- being of all residents — particularly low- and moderate -income residents including youth, seniors, and people with special needs. These needs were determined based on contributions from focus groups, and resident and stakeholder surveys.
The Apple Valley- Victorville Consortium held five virtual focus groups over the period of three days in mid -December 2021. The focus groups were promoted by the cities and facilitated by MDG. The five groups were as follows:
1. Food Banks and Homeless Services,
2. Education and Youth Services,
3. Public Services,
4. Veterans, Elderly and Disabled Services, and
5. Faith Based Organizations.
These groups spoke directly to the need for specific services and the needs of homeless and non- homeless special needs populations. Some organizations participated in multiple focus groups because they serve multiple constituencies. In total, 29 unique people participated in the focus groups, excluding the facilitator and organizers.
Responses to the Resident Survey are presented in Figures 7, 8 and 9. As a result of the citizen participation and consultation process and in consideration of the local nonprofits the City of Victorville considers public services benefitting low - and moderate-income residents a high priority in their respective Strategic Plans.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 60
Figure 14: Resident Survey
Figure 15: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 61
Figure 16: Stakeholder Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 62
Housing Market Analysis
MA-05 OVERVIEW
Housing Market Analysis Overview
This section of the Consolidated Plan evaluates housing market conditions in the Town of Apple Valley and City of Victorville independently as well as the Apple Valley- Victorville Consortium as a whole. The analysis includes housing supply, demand, condition, and cost. Apple Valley’s housing stock primarily consists of single -family detached residential dwellings (76 percent) and three -bedroom units (71 percent).
Victorville’s housing stock primarily consists of single -family detached residential dwellings (79 percent) and three-bedroom units (79 percent).
From December 2017 to December 2021, median home value in Apple Valley increased 53 percent from $ 252,000 to $ 386,000, and the median home value in Victorville increase 59 percent from $246,000 to $391,000, according to Zillow Home Value Index. As of 2017, the most common rental unit size in Apple Valley was two- bedrooms and in Victorville was three -bedrooms. During the December 2017 to December 2021 period, median monthly rent for a two-bedroom unit in Apple Valley increased 55 percent from $ 896 to $1,385, and the median monthl y rent for three - bedroom unit in Victorville increased 42 percent from $1,299 to $1,850, as reported by Zumper, a rental listing aggregator . As a result, Apple Valley and Victorville households have become increasingly cost-burdened. Data from 2013-2017 shows an insufficient number of housing units affordable to people with incomes less than 80 percent of AMI.
Tables 10 and 11 of the Needs Assessment section of the Consolidate d Plan show 74 percent of households (19,649 households) in the Apple Valley-Victorville Consortium earning 0-80 percent of AMI, are cost burdened— meaning households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing — and 9,515 (41 percent) households are considered severely cost burdened, meaning they pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing. Of the severely cost burdened households earning 0-80 percent of AMI , more than two thirds are renters. Of those severely cost burdened renter households, 94 percent (6,255 households) earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 63
Figure 17
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Five year estimates from the ACS and CHAS were evaluated to determine if a geographic concentration of housing problems, racial and ethnic minorities, and low- income households exist in the Victorville. The spatial units under consideration are census tracts. A concentration is defined as ten percent over the rate at which any of the circumstances identified above occur throughout the City as a whole. The thresholds are as follows:
• Low-income households 59.7 percent,
• One or more housing problem 39.2 percent, and
• Racial and ethnic minorities 82.6 percent
As seen in the concentration maps in the section there are multiple census tracts which exceed the thresholds identified above. Notably there are two census tract which exceed all three thresholds.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 64
Figure 18: Concentration of households with low-income
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 65
Figure 19: Concentration of households with multiple housing problems
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 66
Figure 20: Concentration of racial and ethnic minorities
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 67
MA-10 NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS
Introduction
According to 201 3-2017 ACS data, Victorville 79 percent of the housing stock is comprised of single -family detached housing (one -four units). Multifamily housing (five or more units) accounts for only two percent and one percent of total housing units in Victorville. This is the smallest portion of housing stock for Victorville.
Most owner -occupied housing units in Victorville are comprised of larger units containing three or more bedrooms (85 percent and 91 percent, respectively). There is more diversity of unit size in rental housing stock between two- and three-bedroom units in Victorville. The tables below indicate the number of residential properties in the City by property type, unit size and tenure.
City of Victorville
Property Type Number %
1-unit detached structure 27,950 79%
1-unit, attached structure 400 1%
2-4 units 1,935 5%
5-19 units 2,260 6%
20 or more units 1,545 4%
Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc. 1,485 4%
Total 35,757 100%
Table 8 – Residential Properties by Unit Number
Figure 21
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 68
City of Victorville
Owners Renters
Number % Number %
No bedroom 150 1% 250 2%
1 bedroom 90 1% 1,130 7%
2 bedrooms 1,365 8% 3,749 25%
3 or more bedrooms 15,865 91% 10,035 66%
Total 17,470 100% 15,155 100%
Table 9 – Unit Size by Tenure
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Figure 22
Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs.
As of fall 2021, the City of Victorville monitors a total of 12 affordable housing projects, which were constructed or rehabilitated with federal subsidy contracts, received tax credits, and /or were financed by Redevelopment Agency (RDA) funds. The 12 projects consist of a total of 1,346 units, all but five of which are restricted to extremely/very low, low- and moderate-income households (under State HCD guidelines).
Like all places in the State of California, Victorville is challenged by a lack of resources to address its affordable housing needs due to the dissolution of all the State’s redevelopment agencies.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 69
Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts.
HUD requires the City to analyze federal, state and locally assisted housing units that may be lost from the City’s affordable housing stock. The expiration of affordability restrictions on government assisted rental units is the typical reason that affordable units convert to market rate and are “lost.” Much of the housing at -risk of conversion from affordable housing to market rate housing is predominantly reserved for lower income households.
Use restrictions, as defined by state law, means any federal, state, or local statute, regulation, ordinance or contract which as a condition of receipt of any housing assistance, including a rental subsidy, mortgage subsidy, or mortgage insurance , to an assisted housing development, establishes maximum limitations on tenant income as a condition of eligibility for occupancy.
Conversion Risk
Table 10: Subsidized Housing provides an inventory of affordable housing developments in Victorville, including funding sources, number of units, target populations, and earliest date of conversion to market- rate housing. Analysis shows, for the period ending May 2021 no units in either jurisdiction were at high risk of converting to market rate housing.
City of Victorville
Project/Address
Total
Subsidized
Units
Type of Subsidy Date of
Conversion
Rodeo Drive Apts. 99 Section 8, FHA 2065
Sherwood Villa Apts. 101 Section 8, FHA 2069
Northgate Village Apts. 68 Section 8, State, RDA 2060
Village Oak Apts. 116 Section 42 Tax Credit Units 2054
Northside Commons 82 Section 42 Tax Credit Units 2057
Kimberly Park Apts. 132 Section 42 Tax Credit Units 2034 Impressions at Valley Center 99 RDA, HOME, CTAC Perpetuity Village at Victorville 79 CTAC 2061
Casa Bella Family Apts. 286 CTAC 2063
Rodeo Meadows 48 CTAC/ RDA 2057
Rancho Seneca Apts. 200 CSCDA Bonds 2067
Desert Haven 31 NSP 2075
Table 10 – Subsidized Housing
Data Source: 2021-2029 Housing Element
Preservation and Replacement Options
At this point in time no units in Victorville are at risk of becoming unaffordable. In the future, when the Town and City encounter the challenge of maintaining the existing
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 70
affordable housing stock, they may consider preserving the existing assisted units or facilitating the development of new units. Each negotiation to pre serve affordable units is unique in the sense that each project’s ownership interests, and economic needs will vary, and the jurisdiction’s resources may be insufficient to preserve all expiring units. Depending on the circumstances of each project that includes at- risk units, different options may be used to preserve or replace the units.
Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population? The current availability of housing units in the Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium does not meet the needs of the population. The re is a significant need for additional rental housing units — particularly zero, one-bedroom units, and those affordable to households earning less than 50 percent of AMI. According to the data discussed in the Needs Assessment, the most common housing problems in the Consortium are cost burden and overcrowding. There are 6,255 renter households who earn less than 50 percent of AMI that are severely cost burdened paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs (Table 11). Overcrowding, having more than 1.01 people per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, foyers, hal ls, or half -rooms, impacts 2,148 low- and moderate -income households in the Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium, almost 76 percent of whom are renters (Table 12).
Describe the need for specific types of housing.
Of the 2,150 renter households in the Apple Valley-Victorville Consortium who earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are severely cost burdened paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs:
• 3,305 are small, related households with four or fewer members • 1,135 are large, related households with five or more members • 880 are elderly households with one or more members over age 62 • 935 are other/single person households
This breakdown by tenure, income, cost burden and household type indicate a need for additional affordable zero - and one -bedroom rental units in the Apple Valley - Victorville Consortium.
Discussion
For decades, California’s housing market has been among the most expensive in the country, and those conditions persist in 2021 . Renting can take up a considerable amount of income, while purchasing a home may be out of reach for individuals. To afford median rent for a three -bedroom unit as of December 2021, a Victorville household needs to earn $38.54 per hour or work 119 hours pe r week at minimum wage of $13 per hour, which equates to about three full time jobs. These calculations were made using the same method as the National Low-Income Housing Coalition in
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 71
the Out if Reach series and using median rents from Zumper a rental list ing aggregator. Median rents are far greater than fair market rents and more accurately reflect the experience low- and moderate-income households are facing.
Figure 23
Data Source: 2021 Zumper Research (accessed 2/4/2022) and State of CA Minimum Wage Data
As noted in the City of Victorville’s 2021-2029 Housing Element, it is the City’s goal to encourage development of different housing types to meet the City’s different needs.
Over the next eight years the City will strive to meet the following housing goals:
• Maximize land utilization for residential development, • Preserve existing housing stock,
• Encourage more affordable housing units,
• Maximize solution for those experiencing or at risk of homelessness, • Encourage homeownership,
• Improve quality of life and promote placemaking, and
• Affirmatively further fair housing.
Through these efforts, the City will strive to maintain a healthy community that encourages family stability and economic growth.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 72
MA-15 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS: COST OF HOUSING
Introduction
One of the most important factors in evaluating a community’s housing market is the cost of housing and whether the housing is affordable to households who live there or would like to live there. If housing costs are relatively high in comparison to household income, a correspondingly high prevalence of housing cost burden and overcrowding will typically occur.
Table 11 – Rental Housing Cost Estimates – and Table 12 – Cost of Housing – indicate the median home value and contract rent (not including utility or other assoc iated costs). These values are self-reported by residents through the U.S. Census American Community Survey. However, in looking at more current housing sales and rental market data – the cost of housing has risen tremendously over the past five years.
According to Zumper, a rental listing aggregator, median rents for two- and three- bedroom units have increased from December 2017 to 2021. The 2017 average rents reported by Zumper significantly exceeded the median contract rent as reported by the ACS 2013-2017 estimates in the Cost of Housing table below.
Figure 24
Data Source: 2017-2021 Zumper Research (accessed 2/4/2022) Median home values have increased significantly since the last Consolidated Planning process. In 2017, according to ACS data, median home values in Victorville were d 31 percent below what they had been in 2009, prior to the mortgage -backed securities housing foreclosure crisis. By 2019, according to the same source, housing prices had still not rebounded to 2009 levels. According to the Zillow Home Value Index housing values increased 59 percent in Victorville from December 2017 to 2021, from $483,000 to $676,000, according to the Zillow Home Value Index. Based on this more current data, home values have exceeded 2009 amounts.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 73
Figure 25
Data Source: 2017-2021 Zillow Data
City of Victorville
Average Rent/ Unit Type Oct. 2017 Oct. 2021 Percent Change 2-bedroom $838 $1,455 74%
3-bedroom $1,299 $1,850 42%
Table 11 – Rental Housing Cost Estimates
Data Source: Zumper Research (accessed 2/4/2022)
City of Victorville
Cost of Housing Base Year: 2009 Most Recent Year: 2017 % Change Median Home Value $259,000 $177,600 -31%
Median Contract Rent $869 $995 14%
Table 12 – Cost of Housing
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Base Year), 2013-2017 ACS (Most Recent Year) Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels? Housing cost burden and severe housing cost burden data from section NA -10 indicate there is an insufficient supply of affordable housing units in the Apple Valley- Victorville Consortium. Quantifying the number of additional affordable housing units needed to eliminate or significantly reduce cost burden and severe cost burden is complicated because there is no guarantee a household of a particular income level will occupy a unit affordable at their income level – even if the unit is available in the open marketplace.
There is an apparent need for 7,065 additional housing units affordable to households’ earning 0 -30 percent of AMI. At the 0 -50 percent of AMI level, there are 5,775 affordable units and 16,115 households in this income category – a shortfall o f 10,340 units. At the 0-80 percent of AMI level, there are 26,175 affordable units and 26,685 households in this income category – a surplus of 6,515 units. This is according to 2013- 2017 CHAS data concerning the supply of housing units in the City that are affordable
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 74
to households earning at or below 30, 50, 80 and 100 percent of AMI and 2013-2017 ACS data on household income.
How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents?
Rental housing costs have increased steadily over the past five years – creating more pressure on extremely low -income households. According from Zumper (Table 11 – Rental Housing Cost Estimates ), a rental listing aggregator, average rents for a two- bedroom unit in Victorville increased from $838 to $1,455 on average, an increase of 74 percent and three-bedroom rents increased from $1,299 to $1,850 an increase of 42 percent over the last five years. These rents represent a significant burden for low- and moderate-income households struggling to remain housed. Home values increased significantly as well. In Victorville, from December 2017 to 2021 according to sales data supplied by Zillow (Figure 15), home values increase from $246,000 to $391,000, a rate of 59 percent. Based on this information and barring significant regional and national changes in economic conditions, the price of housing in Victorville is forecast to continue increasing during the period of the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan.
How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing?
HOME rents, Fair Market rents, and Market rents were compared to median contract rents from 2019 to determine the financial impact on operating income. To produce or preserve affordable rental housing units that carry a minimum HOME affordability period of 20 years, significant levels of subsidy are required.
For Victorville the low HOME and market rate rent closest to the median contract rent was for four - and two-bedroom units. The foregone rent over a 20 -year period for a four-bedroom unit at low HOME rates was $5,040. The foregone rent over a 20 -year period for a two -bedroom unit at market rate was $14,160. Notably, a quarter of occupied rental units in the Town are two -bedroom and nine percent are one - bedroom and efficiency units. The high concentration of larger rental units may drive up the median rental contract and drive down the rental rate per square foot.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 75
Figure 26
Data Source: 2019 ACS, HUD Fair Market Rent 2019, 2019 Zumper Research,
Discussion
Economic expansion over the last decade and a lag in production of new housing units in Southern California have created a housing economy that is over -burdened.
As a result, Apple Valley and Victorville households have become increasingly cost - burdened. Data from 201 3-2017 shows an insufficient number of housing units affordable to people with incomes less than 50 percent of AMI. Considering the scarcity of land and monetary resources available to create new affordable housing units, housing affordability is expected to remain a significant challenge in the next five years.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 76
MA-45 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ASSETS
Introduction
Non-housing community development needs includ e economic development and improvements to public facilities . Special economic development activities must meet a National Object ive by addressing low - or moderate-income residents, slum/ blight, or urgent need and be an eligible activity per 24 CFR 570.203. Public facilities assisted with CDBG must serve low - and moderate -income residents or those residents presumed by HUD to be low- and moderate-income. Such facilities include senior centers, community centers, facilities for victims of domestic violence, facilities for treatment of persons with HIV/AID S, and ADA improvements to public facilities throughout the City. During the implementation of the 2022 -2026 Strategic Plan, Victorville will use CDBG funds to develop the local economy and address these needs and provide a suitable living environment for low- and moderate-income people.
To expand economic opportunities for low - and moderate -income people and provide a pathway out of poverty, the Strategic Plan and the 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan includes public services. These projects include getting clothing to school aged children, homeless shelter operations, providing behavioral health care to foster youth and their foster families, and exercise, cooking, and art classes for people with special needs.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 77
Economic Development Market Analysis
Victorville
Business by Sector Number
of
Workers
Number
of Jobs
Share of
Workers
Share
of
Jobs
Jobs
less
workers
Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas
Extraction 450 22 1% 0% -1%
Arts, Entertainment,
Accommodations 4,615 4,335 14% 18% 4%
Construction 2,280 402 7% 2% -5%
Education and Health Care Services 7,122 6,981 22% 29% 7% Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 1,288 902 4% 4% 0%
Information 552 564 2% 2% 0%
Manufacturing 3,091 1,579 10% 7% -3%
Other Services 1,106 618 3% 3% 0%
Professional, Scientific,
Management Services 1,886 876 6% 4% -2%
Public Administration 0 0 0% 0% 0%
Retail Trade 5,145 5,828 16% 24% 8%
Transportation and Warehousing 3,144 1,077 10% 4% -6%
Wholesale Trade 1,616 760 5% 3% -2%
Total -- -- --
Table 13 - Business Activity
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS (Workers), 2017 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (Jobs)
Victorville
Labor Force
Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 47,705
Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 40,920
Unemployment Rate 14.2%
Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 29.48%
Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 7.35%
Table 14 - Labor Force
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 78
Victorville
Occupations by Sector Number of People
Management, business and financial 6,425
Farming, fisheries and forestry occupations 2,025
Service 5,690
Sales and office 10,800
Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair 4,320
Production, transportation and material moving 3,095
Table 15 – Occupations by Sector
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Victorville
Travel Time Number Percentage
< 30 Minutes 20,720 55%
30-59 Minutes 8,955 24%
60 or More Minutes 7,910 21%
Total 37,585 100%
Table 16 - Travel Time
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Victorville
Educational Attainment In Labor Force
Civilian
Employed
Unemployed Not in Labor
Force
Less than high school graduate 4,585 1,125 5,620
High school graduate (includes
equivalency) 9,645 1,405 6,785
Some college or Associates degree 14,290 1,420 7,165
Bachelor's degree or higher 5,830 460 1,320
Table 17 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older) Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 79
Victorville
Age
18–24
yrs
25–34
yrs
35–44
yrs
45–65
yrs
65+ yrs
Less than 9th grade 230 530 1,180 2,240 2,030
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 1,750 2,240 2,670 2,465 1,225 High school graduate, GED, or
alternative 3,930 6,120 4,765 6,945 2,865
Some college, no degree 4,755 6,110 4,320 6,845 2,835
Associates degree 580 2,540 895 2,270 955
Bachelors degree 260 1,280 1,465 2,065 690
Graduate or professional degree 10 655 720 1,480 375
Table 18 - Educational Attainment by Age
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Victorville
Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Less than high school graduate $22,535
High school graduate (includes equivalency) $27,870
Some college or Associates degree $30,925
Bachelor's degree $47,680
Graduate or professional degree $61,560
Table 19 – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months by Educational Attainment Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction?
According to 2017 Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) data, the top five major private employment sectors in Victorville are education and health care services (6,981 jobs), retail trade (5,828 jobs), arts, entertainment, accommodations (4,335 jobs), transportation and warehousing (1,077), and construction (402 jobs).
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ current employment data for San Bernardino County, selected for top industries, by number of jobs in Victorville offers a picture of employment trends over time. As seen in Figure 17 employment growth in transportation, warehousing and utilities appears to have been uninterrupted by COVID-19. All other top employing industries in V ictorville show a decrease in employment when COVID -19 hit. For the education and health services industry, which was experiencing a period of rapid growth, the decline in jobs was real, but set the industry back about a year. Arts and entertainment, tourism, and retail have been severely impacted by the pandemic throughout the country. These employment sectors had been steady since 2015 and in 2019 employment decreased significantly.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 80
Figure 27
Data Source: 2015-2020 County Employment by Industry CA EDD
Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community
The business community in Victorville relies largely on a skilled workforce. Residents of Victorville identified employment training as the greatest need and highest priority in the city. Employers across all sectors, and especially those for which Victorville is a destination location or part of a larger logistics chain such as arts, entertainment and accommodations and manufacturing, require a well -functioning transportation system.
Figure 28: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 81
Figure 29: Resident Survey
Figure 30: Stakeholder Survey
Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create.
The coronavirus pandemic has had a major and sustained impact on all sectors of the economy. It has both highlighted and increased the need for fast, reliable, and secure internet has increased across all sectors of the economy.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 82
In response to the COVID -19 pandemic, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The Act authorized $.2.2 trillion to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID -19 pandemic. The City of Vi ctorville received $1,527,782 in CARES Act CDBG funds. These funds assisted households to make emergency rent, mortgage, and utility payments and to help small businesses prepare and respond to the virus.
Additionally, the City of Victorville received $33 ,500,000 in Federal American Rescue Plan Act funds. The first tranche of 16.75 million was received in June 2021 and the second tranche will be released in June 2022. City staff identified the following eligible activities and funding for each one:
Housing and Homelessness - $6 Million
o Outreach Programs
o Wellness Center Facility
Community Improvements - $9 Million
o Utility Assistance Program
o Self-Cleaning Restrooms
o Improve Public Facilities
Broadband - $8 Million
o WiFi at Victorville Parks and Community Centers
o New Infrastructure
Community & Small Business Recovery - $4 Million
o Hiring Bonuses
o Hazard Pay for Essential Workers
Water/Sewer/Storm Drain - $6 Million
o Water Well Maintenance/Repairs
o Reservoir Refurbishment
The first implemented program using ARPA funds was the City’s Past Due Utility Program, which assisted residents with their past due water bills. For 2022-2023 ARPA funds will be used to funds utility assistance programs, rental and mortgage assistance programs and food banks administered by non-profit organizations.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 83
How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction?
Most employees in Victorville’s civilian labor force have some post-secondary education, almost 42 percent of the employed labor force has some college or Associates degree . Generally . T he skills and education of the current workforce correspond to the employment opportunities in Victor ville; however, the jobs and opportunities do not correspond to the number of available workers . In 2017, there were only two employment sectors where there were more jobs than workers. More than half the working population in Victorville travel more than half an hour to work.
Figure 31
Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan.
The San Bernardino County Workforce Development Board provides strategic direction and relationships for the WDC. San Bernardino County Workforce Development Centers (WDC) are the primary source of workforce training available to residents of Victorville. The WDC is operated by America’s Job Centers of California.
The City of Victorville work with the San Bernardino County WCD and employers to secure on-the-job training when appropriate.
Victor Valley College (VVC) is a p ublic community college located in Victorville and serving Victorville, Hesperia, Apple Valley, Phelan and Adelanto. It is part of the
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 84
California Community College System. VVC offers over Certificates in over 100 vocational subjects. The College is an important partner in educating and training the local workforce.
Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy?
Yes, the City of Victorville participated in development of the San Bernardino County 2019 CEDS.
If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth.
The City of Victorville’s CDBG program will support local economic growth by meeting extremely low-, low- and moderate-income and homeless residents where they are to improve quality of life and better position for access and engagement in economic opportunities. This will be achieved by supporting local nonprofit ser vice providers, including housing services, and support of the development and preservation of affordable housing.
Discussion
The highly contagious nature of COVID-19 and the scale of illness and death has had significant ripple effects on the economy. In the spring of 2020, unemployment rates in the United States reached the highest levels since the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) began recording this data. According to the BLS, unemployment rates peaked at 14.2 percent in San Bernardino County and 17 percent in Victorville in April 2020. Those rates have fallen to 5.2 and 8.2 percent, respectively, as of December 2021, unemployment is still above pre -pandemic levels. Health and safety guidelines and requirements continue to change as the co ronavirus evolves and the scientific community learns more about the virus. Employers and workers are required to constantly learn and reevaluate changing situations.
Another indication of the negative economic impact of the pandemic is the year over year decrease in California of personal consumption expenditures of over four percent from 2019 to 2020, as calculated by the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). The BEA calculated San Bernardino County’s gross domestic product which inc rease from $96.7 million in 2019 to $97 million in 2020.
State level calculations, which are more current, show the negative economic impact cause by the pandemic. According to the BEA, in 2020, California GPD fell for the first time in ten years.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 85
MA-60 BROADBAND NEEDS OF HOUSING OCCUPIED
BY LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households, including low- and moderate-income households and neighborhoods.
Broadbandnow.com is a widely used source of information about internet availability throughout the county and reports Victorville residents have several options for broadband internet service. According to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) three percent of consumers only have access to one or fewer wired internet providers at their address and the average download speed is almost 194 megabits per second (mbps). The responses to the Resident Survey show a relatively low rate of connectivity given the FCC data. This could be due to the small sample size of the survey.
Figure 32:Resident Survey
Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction.
According to the FCC, 97 percent of Victorville has access to at least two wired internet providers at their address. Throughout the City , residents are serviced by multiple internet service providers who offer high speed internet. Providers include, Spectrum, Viasat, HughesNet, Frontier Communications, T -Mobile, and Ultra. According to the Resident Survey, most pay $50 to $100 per month for internet service provided by Spectrum or Frontier.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 86
Figure 33:Resident Survey
Figure 34: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 87
MA-65 HAZARD MITIGATION, VICTORVILLE
Describe the jurisdiction’s increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change.
The City of Victorville’s Hazard Mitigation Plan has been approved by Cal OES, FEMA, and City Council. The Plan is based on extensive research and community engagement and intended to mitigate the effects of natural disasters and return to “the norm” soone r, while also building back better so the community is more advantageously positioned for future disasters. Such planning is required by FEMA to receive federal disaster mitigation funds.
Through multivariate analysis Victorville’s risks were quantified and ranked. Across 13 hazards, four were ranked as high. From greatest to least those risks are Earthquake/ Seismic, Flash Flood, Climate Change, Dam Inundation, Drought, Power Failure/ PSPS, Terrorism, Pandemic, Pipeline Rupture HAZMAT Release, Extreme Heat, High Winds/ Severe Storm, Aviation Accident, Fire/ Wildfire.
Victorville’s mitigation goals are as follows:
• Goal 1: Protect life, property, and reduce potential injuries from natural, technological, and human- caused hazards, including catastrophic threats posed by the DWR owned Cedar Springs Dam and the USACE owned Mohave Forks Dam which are high hazard dams and a major earthquake hazard. • Goal 2: Improve public understanding of and support for the need for hazard mitigation measures.
• Goal 3: Promote disaster resistance for Victorville’s natural, existing, and future built environment.
• Goal 4: Strengthen partnerships and collaboration to implement hazard mitigation activities.
• Goal 5: Enhance the City’s ability to effectively and immediately respond to disasters.
Describe the vulnerability of housing occupied by low- and moderate- income households to these risks.
Most of the respondents to the Resident Survey feel somewhat prepared for a disaster (Figure 25: Resident Survey.). Low- and moderate-income residents and special needs populations are especially vulnerable to the risks of c limate-related hazards. The residences of low - and moderate -income households are more often in worse condition and thus are more susceptible to external weather conditions such as extreme heat. Likewise, elderly residents are at a greater risk during extreme weather events such as extreme heat events.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 88
Figure 35: Resident Survey
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 89
Strategic Plan
SP-05 OVERVIEW
The Strategic Plan is a guide for the City of Victorville to establish its housing, community and economic development priorities, strategies, and goals for the investment of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from HUD over the next five years, beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2026. The priority needs and goals established in this Strategic Plan are based on analysis of information including the results of the City’s 2022 Resident and Stakeholder Surveys, focus groups, and housing and community development data elements required by HUD in the online Consolidated Plan system (the eCon Planning Suite) from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the same period. Additional sources of information used to identify needs and establish priorities were obtained through consultation with local nonprofit agencies involved in the development of affordable housing and the delivery of public services to low - and moderate -income people, persons with special needs and those at risk of homelessness.
In consideration of community input and available data, the five priority needs listed below are established as part of this Strategic Plan.
• Supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness • Human services
• Housing programs
• Accessibility and mobility
• Economic Development
Consistent with HUD’s national goals for the CDBG and HOME programs to provide decent housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income residents, the priority needs listed above will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of CDBG- and HOME -funded activities aligned with the following nine measurable Strategic Plan goals as elaborated in Section SP-45:
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 90
Goal Name Category Need(s) Addressed Goal Outcome
Indicator
1. Provide suitable
living
environments for
residents
- Affordable
Housing
Homeless
- Non-Homeless
Special Needs
- Non-Housing
Community
Development
- Supportive services
for the homeless and
those at risk of
homelessness
- Human services
Public service
activities for low/
moderate income
housing benefit:
17,490 people, 500
households, 135
structures
2. Decent and
affordable
housing for
consortia
residents
Affordable
Housing
Housing programs Homeowner
housing
rehabilitation: 300
household housing
units
3. Expand access to
essential services
and amenities
Non-housing
community
development
Accessibility and
mobility
Economic
Development
Public Facility of
Infrastructure other
than Low /
Moderate-Income
Housing Benefit:
500 people
Businesses – 10
business
Table 20 - Strategic Plan Summary
Historically, the City of Victorville has used CDBG funding to support activities that meet one of the aforementioned goals or similar goals established in the prior Consolidated Plan. Over the next five years, the City will continue to support public services through CDBG public service grants and other local funds that meet the goals of this Strategic Plan.
The City has established the following priority ranking system for housing and community development activities to be funded over the next five years:
• High Priority: Activities meeting a high priority Strategic Plan Goal are expected to be funded during the 2022-2026 period.
• Low Priority: Activities meeting a low priority Strategic Plan Goal may be considered for funding if sufficient funds are available after high priority activities are funded, up to but not exceeding the five -year goal outcome indicator set forth in this Strategic Plan.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 91
SP-10 GEOGRAPHIC PRIORITIES
Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA)
According to data from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates in HUD’s eCon Planning Suite for the Consolidated Plan, the City's household median income is $ 47,895. Evaluation of maps generated through HUD's Community Planning and Development mapp ing system (CPD Maps) reveals one Census Tract, the majority of which falls outside of the City limits, where the median income is less than 50 percent of AMI, it is above 50 percent of AMI in the remaining census tracts.
HUD allows CDBG grantees to implement certain activities such as initial construction or expansion of community facilities and infrastructure that benefit certain neighborhoods or villages (but not the entire City) provided the entire service area for the facility or infrastructure is pri marily residential and where at least 51 percent of residents are low- and moderate-income. In the majority of Census Tracts in Victorville over 51 percent of residents earn less than 80 percent of AMI. According to CPD maps, there are five Census tracts (98.00, 99.04, 99.05, 99.12, and 99.13) within Victorville City limits where over 49 percent of household incomes exceed 80 percent of AMI.
The Consortia will use a place-based strategy to distribute funding. It is the Consortia’s intent to fund construction activities in the areas most directly affected by the needs of low-income residents and those with other special needs. Where appropriate the Annual Action Plan will direct investment geographically to an area benefit neighborhood. The area benefit cate gory is the most used national objective for activities benefitting a residential neighborhood. An area benefit activity is one that benefits all residents, where at least 51 percent are low- and moderate-income. Public infrastructure improvements are an area benefit activity when they are in a predominantly low- and moderate-income neighborhood.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 92
SP-25 PRIORITY NEEDS
Priority Need Supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low-;
Large Families; Families with Children; Elderly
Chronically homeless; Individuals; Families with Children; Mentally Ill; Chronic Substance Abuse; Veterans; Persons with HIV/AIDS, Victims of Domestic Violence; Unaccompanied Youth;
Geographic
Areas
Citywide
Associated
Goals
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Description The City of Victorville holds this as a high priority and will support CDBG public service activities which help prevent homelessness and support efforts for a structured path to stable housing for individuals and families who become homeless. This priority will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with
contributions from the private sector.
Basis for
Relative
Priority
According to the 2020 Point-In Time Count, there were 2,842 people living in homelessness, the majority (2,365) of whom were unsheltered. Across all focus group s the need for wrap around homeless services and facilities were identified as a high priority need. The homeless service providers and food bank focus group spoke directly to the expansive and complicated needs of those who are homeless and at risk of homelessness. Homeless services were identified by residents in the 2022 Consolidated Plan survey and in consultation with community stakeholders as both in high need and a high priority.
Priority Need Human services
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low; Low; Moderate,
Large Families; Families with Children; Elderly; Public Housing Residents
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 93
Elderly; Frail Elderly; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Persons with Physical Disabilities; Persons with Developmental Disabilities; Persons with Alcohol of Other Addictions; Persons with HIV/ AIDS and their Families; Victims of DV; Non -Housing Community Development
Geographic
Areas Citywide
Associated
Goals
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Description The City of Victorville holds this as a high priority and will support CDBG public service activities which help support individuals and families with individual and group development. This priority will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with
contributions from the private sector.
Basis for
Relative
Priority
The City of Victorville’s Strategic Plan for calls for a range of services for low - and moderate -income residents and those with special needs as a high priority. The top four highly needed and highest priority public services, excluding homeless services, according to the 2022 Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, are as follows: mental health, youth services, and services for abused and neglected children. The need for public services will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with contributions from the private sector. These results were echoed by participants in five focus groups: homeless services and food banks, education and youth services, public services, veterans, elderly and disabled services, and faith-based organizations.
Throughout San Bernardino County, including Victorville, maintaining mental health, and appropriate services for youth including abandoned and neglected children is a high priority. - Nearly 17 percent of San Bernardino Count y residents had mental illness in 2017, and only about eight percent received mental health services, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).
- population, including ch ildren will have PTSD at some point in their lives. Applying those rates to the 121, 000 residents of the Victorville, approximately 7,303 suffer from PTSD.
- In Victorville children under the age of six are present in 4,890 households with incomes below 80 percent of AMI.
The National Center reports an estimated six percent of the
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 94
Priority Need Housing programs
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low; Low; Moderate
Large Families; Families with Children; Elderly; Public Housing Residents
Elderly; Persons with Physical Disabilities; Victims of Domestic Violence
Geographic
Areas Citywide
Associated
Goals Decent and affordable housing for consortia residents.
Description Preservation and creation of new affordable housing is necessary to meet the housing needs in Victorville and the Apple Valley - Victorville Consortium. Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units occupied by low - and moderate- income households is a cost -effective way to invest limited resources to retain existing housing units already affordable to low- and moderate-income households in the community. Create new housing affordable to extremely low -, low- and mo derate-income households through development of subsidized rental housing.
Basis for
Relative
Priority
There are tens of thousands of households in the Apple Valley - Victorville consortium that experience housing cost burden and need more affordable housi ng. Almost 39 percent of the Apple Valley-Victorville consortium households that earn less than 50 percent of AMI are renters who experience a severe cost burden, making these households the most at risk of homelessness.
Furthermore, for 16,115 households earning below 50 percent of AMI there are only 5,775 affordable units in the consortium. According to ACS and CHAS data, 19,649 households earning less than 80 percent of AMI are cost burdened— meaning those households pay more than 30 percent of income for housing costs and 10,980 households are severely cost burdened — meaning they pay more than 50 percent of income for housing costs.
As the City's housing stock ages, a growing percentage of housing units may need rehabilitation to allow them to remain safe and habitable. Low- and moderate -income homeowners , as well a s owners of multi-family properties, may not be financially positioned to properly maintain their investments. Homeowners and renters who have fixed incomes may struggle to keep up their homes and be unable afford an increase to their rent.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 95
The age and condition of Victorville’s housing stock is an important indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Almost 79 percent of housing in the Apple Valley -Victorville consortium has been constructed since 1980. Commonly, housing over 30 years of age needs some form of major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation work and plumbing systems. Housing over 20 years of age will generally exhibit deficiencies in terms of paint, weatherization, heating / air -conditioning systems, hot water heaters and finish plumbing fixtures.
According to CHAS data showing the year housing units were built categorized by owner and renter tenure:
• Built 2000 or later 12,190 or about 37 percent of the 32,975 owner-occupied housing units;
• Built 1980 -1999 15,245 or 46 percent of the 32,975 -owner occupied housing units;
• Built 2000 or later 6,735 or approximately 29 percent of the 23,575 renter-occupied housing units; and
• Built 1980 -1999 10,475 or 50 percent of the 23,575 renter occupied housing units.
In the Apple Valley -Victorville consortium, of units constructed before 1980 occupied by households earning below 80 percent of AMI, about 46 percent (5,425 households) are renters and 20 percent (2,389 households) are owners.
Throughout the Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium and in Victorville specifically residents and stakeholders expressed need for housing services and expanded/ improved types of housing through focus groups and surveys. Focus group participants voices the overall need for affordable housing and the specific needs for senior housing, rental rehab, and utility assistance. The surveys show a high need for the following housing services: rehab program
encompassing energy efficient improvements and general rehab as well as code enforcement. The surveys show affordable rental housing and senior housing are in the top three highest priority and most highly needed types of housing facilities
Priority Need Accessibility and mobility
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low; Low; Moderate
Large Families; Families with Children; Elderly
Elderly; Frail Elderly; Persons with Physical Disabilities
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 96
Table 21 – Priority Needs Summary
Narrative (Optional)
The City will incorporate the above goals along with specific needs identified through community engagement in considering funding applications f or each of its five Action Plans covered by the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan.
Pursuant to CDBG regulations, all projects must meet one of three national objectives set forth by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD): (1) Benefit low- and moderate-income households, (2) Aid in the elimination/ prevention of slum and blight, or (3) Meet and urgent need (catastrophic events). Pursuant to HOME regulations, HOME funds are specifically focused on affordable housing activities and may be used to develop and support affordable rental housing and homeownership opportunities. Recommended project for funding should be Geographic
Areas
Citywide;
Associated
Goals
Expand access to essential services and amenities; Economic Development
Description Develop and support efforts to improve mobility in the community; identify and remove barriers that impede accessibility; support transit systems, mass and specialized, that enable residents to access destination for employment, edu cation, and other essential purposes; support collaborative efforts to improve community and regional transit.
Economic Development activities will include commercial rehabilitation, which includes exterior improvements and code compliance; micro-enterprise development to include training and technical assistance and other support services to increase the capacity of grantees to carry out microenterprise activities; water and sewer projects.
Basis for
Relative
Priority
Focus group participants voiced the need for improved mobility within the city and access to points beyond the city.
Based on the results of the Consolidated Plan Resident Survey and input from community workshops and consultations, the City of Victorville places a low priority on employment training and loans/ grants to small businesses owned and operated by low - and moderate-income residents as a pathway out of poverty. This priority will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with contributions from the private sector.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 97
consistent with addressing the needs identified, and priority strategies developed, in each five-year Consolidated Plan.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 98
SP-35 ANTICIPATED RESOURCES
Introduction
During the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2026, the City of Victorville anticipates investing an estimated $7,133,580 of CDBG funds to support the goals of this Strategic Plan. The annual allocation of CDBG is subject to federal appropriations and changes in demographic data used in HUD’s formulas . It is anticipated for the 2022-2023 Program Year the City will receive $1,447,740 in CDBG funds.
Program Uses of Funds
Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected
Amount
Available
Remainder
of Con
Plan
Narrative
Description Annual
Allocation
Program
Income
Prior Year
Resources Total
CDBG
Acquisition
Admin and
Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public
Services
$1,447,740 TBD $272,115 $1,719,855 $5,790,960
Based on
2021-2022
FY
allocation
from HUD.
Table 22- Anticipated Resources
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied.
The City of Victorville is a HOME Consortium member with the Town of Apple Valley.
The Consortium is expected to receive HOME funding which can be lev eraged with CDBG funding if used for affordable housing. The City of Victorville will leverage HOME funding if future projects are presented during the next five years. The HOME program requires a 25 percent match based on fund expenditure. The HOME statute provides a reduction of the matching contribution requirement under three conditions: 1) Fiscal distress; 2) Severe fiscal distress, and 3) Presidentially declared major disasters covered under the Stafford Act. The Consortium has been identified by HUD as a severely fiscally distressed jurisdiction and has been granted a 100 percent match reduction for the fiscal year 2021 -2022. The Consortium expects this designation to occur in 2022-2023 as well.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 99
Depending on the financing structure of a given activity, it may be advantageous for the City to use CDBG funds to leverage appropriate state, local and private resources, including but not limited to those listed below.
Federal Resources
• American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
• Continuum of Care (CoC) Program
• HUD Veterans Affairs supportive Housing (HUD-VASH)
• Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202)
• Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) • Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)
• Youthbuild
• Federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
State Resources
• State Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
• Homekey
• Building Equity and Growth in Neighborhoods Program (BEGIN) • CalHome Program
• Multifamily Housing Program (MHP)
• Housing Related Parks Grant
• CalHFA Single and Multi-Family Program
• Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Funding
Local Resources
• San Bernardino County CoC
• Housing Authority of San Bernardino County (HASBC)
• Southern California Home Financing Authority (SCHFA)
• City of Victorville General Fund
Private Resources
• Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program Community Reinvestment Act Programs United Way Funding Private Contributions
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 100
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
Over the past year, City staff has been pursuing the development of a navigation center campus, called the “Wellness Center,” to be located at 16902 First Street, a City owned property, in accordance with City Council direction at the August 18, 2020, meeting to continue with the land use entitlement process and securing of funding for the project.
Discussion
Assuming continued level funding of the CDBG program, the City expects to spend approximately $ 7,238,700 of CDBG funds on housing, community development, public facilities, infrastructure and neighborhood services activities that promote a suitable living environment between July 20 22 and June 2026. It is anticipated that approximately $4.7 million of this will be spent on construction and housing projects and that $1 million will be spent on public services. Anticipated projects include:
• Housing rehab,
• Public Facilities Improvements (including fire suppression.), and • Public Services.
Assuming the continued funding level of the CDBG program, the City may allocate CDBG funds for economic opportunity activities to support the development and expansion of local small businesses during this next Consolidated Planning cycle through its Office of Economic Development with its microenterprise assistance program.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 101
SP-40 INSTITUTIONAL DELIVERY STRUCTURE
Table 24- Institutional Delivery Structure – provides an overview of the institutional structure through which the City of Victorville will carry out its Consolidated Plan including private industry, nonprofit organizations, and public institutions.
Responsible Entity Responsible Entity
Type
Role Geographic Area
Served
Victorville Government Economic
Development
Homelessness
Non-homeless
special needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
neighborhood
improvements
public facilities
public services
Jurisdiction
Apple Valley Government Economic
Development
Homelessness
Non-homeless
special needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
neighborhood
improvements
public facilities
public services
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
County Continuum
of Care
Continuum of care Homelessness
Planning
Other
Housing Authority of
the County of San
Bernardino County
PHA Homelessness
Public Housing
Rental
Region
Inland Fair Housing
and Mediation Board
Ownership
Rental
Region
Table 23- Institutional Delivery Structure
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 102
Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System The institutional delivery system in Victorville is high-functioning and collaborative— particularly the relationship between local government and the nonprofit sector comprised of a network of capable non- profit organizations that are delivering a full range of services to residents. The primary gap in the delivery system is inadequate resources to address all documented needs. As a result, even projects with a high priority may have to wait to be funded as listed institutions continue to seek additional funding sources.
Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services
Homelessness Prevention
Services
Available in the
Community
Targeted to
Homeless
Targeted to
People with HIV
Homelessness Prevention Services
Counseling/Advocacy X X X
Legal Assistance X X X
Mortgage Assistance X X X
Rental Assistance X X X
Utilities Assistance X X X
Street Outreach Services
Law Enforcement X X X
Mobile Clinics X X X
Other Street Outreach
Services X X X
Supportive Services
Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X X
Child Care X X X
Education X X X
Employment and
Employment Training X X X
Healthcare X X X
HIV/AIDS X X X
Life Skills X X X
Mental Health
Counseling X X X
Transportation X X X
Table 24 - Homeless Prevention Services Summary
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 103
Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth)
The City of Victorville works jointly with the Town of Apple Valley as a consortium to provide housing to their jurisdictions. Together, they participate in the San Bernardino County’s Continuum of Care (COC), which provides funding and a network of resources for homeless abatement. The COC provides emergency shelter, supportive services, transitional and permanent housing. Victorville commits s taff to the COC planning and implementation process and provides the COC Steering Committee critical information regarding the types of resources and programs Victorville currently funds to assist the homeless.
Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above.
The Apple Valley -Victorville Consortium has a long track record of successful partnerships among public and pri vate sector entities. The delivery system for the HUD grant program is no exception. Communication and cooperation is strong between the Consortium the San Bernardino County Homeless Coalition, including partner agencies, and the Housing Authority of the C ounty of San Bernardino . City staff continues to work closely with the other organizations to improve regulatory compliance, monitoring, cooperation and partnerships among agencies and technical capacity of organizations involved in project delivery.
The s ingle most significant gap in the service delivery system remains the lack of available funding to support local programs in Victorville and the Consortium for special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness. In Victorville, this funding is limited to 15 percent of the annual allocation of CDBG funds. The City is not a direct recipient of Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds; therefore, most of the HUD funding to address homelessness is available through the San Bernardino County Continuum of Care. State funding has been reduced with several years of fiscal challenges for the State of California and City funds for this purpose are limited. It has been difficult to accommodate increasing levels of need in the community and increases in the cost of providing services to homeless and special needs populations.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 104
Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs.
To address the lack of resources necessary to fully address the needs of special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness, the City continues to work with its nonprofit service providers to explore alternate funding sources and encourages the identification of alternate revenue streams.
The City of Victorville is undertaking several initiatives to address homelessness and housing instability. In December 2021, the City announced it was awarded a $28 million Homekey award from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the construction and operational support of its Wellness Center Campus. The campus is a critical component of the City’s strategy to reduce homelessness. Combining a low-barrier emergency shelter, recuperative care facility, medical clinic, interim housing, and wraparound support services. Construction is expected to begin in 2022.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 105
SP-45 GOALS SUMMARY
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
Goal 1
Provide suitable
living
environments
for residents
2022 –
202620
27 Affordable
Housing
Homeless
Non-
Homeless
Special
Needs
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Citywide Supportive
services for
the homeless
and those at
risk of
homelessnes
s
Human
services
CDBG:
$4,731,534
Public
service
activities for
low/
moderate
income
housing
benefit:
17,490
people, 2,500
households,
135
structures
Description: Support the development of “one stop” resource centers to assist homeless persons to acquire the necessary documentation and consultation (mental and physical health, nutrition, job skills training, identification, social security and disability benefits, etc.) to achieve reentry into employment and housing; food and nutrition services; utility assistance; support for the Homeless Outreach Proactive Enforcement (HOPE) program; support public safety efforts; provide resource directories for all available services; and encourage collaboration between agencies, faith-based organizations and other stakeholder to unify services.
Goal 2
Decent and
affordable
housing for
consortia
residents
2022 –
2026
Affordable
Housing
Citywide Housing
programs
CDBG:
$987,656
Homeowner
housing
rehabilitation
: 100
household
housing
units
Description: Transitional shelters; affordable housing for multi-family, single family, veterans; rehabilitation owner-occupied and rental; down payment assistance; code enforcement activity to improve neighborhood aesthetics and values; reduce overcrowding in occupied properties; consider establishing rent control for affordability; encourage collaboration between public agencies, developers, investors and other stakeholder to develop a wide range of housing development.
Goal 3
Expand access
to essential
services and
amenities
2022 –
2026
Non-housing
community
development
Citywide Accessibility
and mobility
Economic
Development
CDBG:
$500,000
Public
Facility of
Infrastructur
e other than
Low /
Moderate-
Income
Housing
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 106
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
Description: Develop and support efforts to improve mobility within the community and to points outside of the community, from expansion of paved sidewalks and streets to partnerships with public and privately-owned shared transportation services from buses to cars, to bikes and scooters.
Economic Development activities will include commercial rehabilitation, which includes exterior improvements and code compliance; micro -enterprise development to include training and technical assistance and other support services to increase the capacity of grantees to carry out microenterprise activities; water and sewer projects.
Benefit: 500
people
10 businesses
assisted
Goal 4
Administration
2022 -
2026
All Citywide All CDBG:
$1,447,74
0 N/A
Description: Provide for the timely and compliant administration of the CDBG, ESG, and HOME programs in accordance with HUD policy and federal regulations. HUD requires the City to represent Administration funds as a “goal” within the Strategic Plan so that the sources of funds (refer to Section SP-35) are fully allocated to goals.
Table 25 – Goals Summary
Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2)
State law required jurisdictions to provide for their share of regional housing needs.
As part of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) determines the housing growth needs by income category for the cities within its jurisdiction, which include the City of Victorville. RHNA determination for the City of Victorville for the 2021-2029 period is to provide adequate sites for the construction of 8,165 new dwelling units. Of these new units, 1,735 should be affordable to very low-income, 1,136 should be affordable to low income, and 1,504 should be affordable to moderate-income households.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 107
SP-65 LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARDS
Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards.
The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing -based approaches. This strategy requires the City to implement programs that protect children living in older housing from lead hazards.
Overall, the City has a relatively new housing stock . Therefore, lead -based paint hazards are not an extensive issue in Victorville. According to ACS data, about 79 percent Victorville’s housing stock was built after 1979, when the use of lead -based paint was outlawed, meaning that the residents of these homes should not be at risk of lead-based paint hazards. Only those units constructed prior to January 1, 1978, are presumed to have the potential to contain lead- based paint. In these units, the best way to have reasonable assurance that lead-based paint hazards are not present is to have the painted surfaces tested.
According to the City of Victorville Residential Rehabilitation Program, a typical lead- based paint screening survey costs approximately $5 00 to $1,000 . To reduce lead - based paint hazards, the City of Victorville takes the following actions:
• Include lead testing and abatement procedures, as required, in all residential rehabilitation activities falling under Strategic Plan Goal No. 2 for units built prior to January 1, 1978.
• Educate residents on the health hazards of lead-based paint through brochures and encourage screening children for elevated blood-lead levels. • Disseminate brochures about lead hazards through organizations such as the Inland Fair Housing Council and the City’s residential rehabilitation activities.
How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards?
Over time through testing and abatement, monitoring of public health data, and through public education, the public will have greater awareness of the hazards of lead-based paint to children. This will prompt homeowners, landlords, and parents of young children to proactively address unsafe housing conditions in pre -1978 units where children may potentially be exposed to lead-based paint hazards.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 108
How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures?
In accordance with federal regulation the Town of Apple Valley and the City of Victorville have established policies regarding the identification of lead -based paint (LBP) hazards. Housing build prior to 1978 must undergo lead- based paint testing prior receiving funding for rehabilitation. If deteriorated lead-based paint surfaces are found, they must be stabilized during the rehabilitation of the property. Abatement must be performed by a certified lead- based paint assessor prior to the issuance of the Notice of Completion. The Cons ortia will continue to maintain policies and procedures to increase assess to housing without LBP hazards. CDBG and HOME funding is not provided until it is determined properties are free of LBP hazards.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 109
SP-70 ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY
Jurisdiction Goals, Prog rams and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty-Level Families.
Poverty continues to be a significant challenge in Victorville and the Consortium .
According to the 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, there are 26,480 Victorville residents living below the poverty level. Of these residents, 9.479, over a quarter, are children under the age of 18.
To meaningfully address this challenge, each of the goals included in the 2022 -2026 Strategic Plan is aligned to support activities promoting the availability of affordable housing and provide essential services that directly benefit low - and moderate - income residents. In the implementation of the Strategic Plan, the City will prioritize funding for activities that most effectively address these goals over the next five years.
This strategy will emphasize using CDBG funds to help individuals and families rise out of poverty to long-term self-sufficiency.
The implementation of CDBG activities meeting the goals established in this Strategic Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty-level families by:
• Supporting a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent and eliminate homelessness.
• Supporting expansion of housing affordable to low - and moderate -income households through development of new and preservation of existing housing. • Supporting public services for low - and moderate-income residents including the elderly, veterans, those with special needs and those at -risk of homelessness offered by nonprofit organizations receiving CDBG funds; and • Support access to services, employment center, and amenities and mobility within the city and to surrounding areas.
• Promoting economic opportunity for low - and moderate -income residents through workforce training and small business assistance.
In addition to these local efforts, mainstream state and federal resources also contribute to reducing the number of individuals and families in poverty. Federal programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and Head Start provide a pathway out of pove rty for families who are ready to pursue employment and educational opportunities. In California, the primary programs that assist families in poverty are CalWORKS, CalFresh (formerly food stamps) and Medi-Cal. Together, these programs provide individuals and families with employment assistance, subsidy for food, medical care, childcare, and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing,
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 110
nutrition and transportation. Other services are available to assist persons suffering from substance abuse, domestic violence, and mental illness.
How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan?
Victorville’s Strategic Plan goals are aligned to benefit low - and moderate -income residents and to reduce the number of poverty-level families. For example, the goal of decent and affordable housing for families earning less than 30, 50 and 80 percent of AMI will preserve and provide additional affordable housing options for families transitioning from activities funded under the Homelessness Services goal. It will also include activities targeted to families who own their residence but lack the resources to address emergency repairs or maintain the property in compliance with City codes and standards. Addressing substandard or emergency housing conditions allows low- and moderate-income families to maintain housing stability while also guaranteeing that all economic segments of the community live in decent housing . The goal to provide suitable living environments will include funding for activities targeted to families in poverty and other low - and moderate -income households with specific service needs. Providing this range of targeted services allows children, families, seniors, and re sidents with special needs in Victorville appropriate support and resources to thrive.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 111
SP-80 MONITORING
Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements
To ensure CDBG funds are used efficiently and in compliance with applicable regulations, the City provides technical assistance to all subrecipients at the beginning of each program year and monitors subrecipients throughout the program year.
Technical Assistance
To enhance compliance with federal program regulations, the City provides an annual Notice of F unding Availability workshop to review the Annual Action Plan goals, program requirements and available resources with potential applicants. After the Action Plan is approved, a mandatory subrecipient workshop is held to review program regulations in detail, to provide useful forms and resources for documenting compliance and to review the City’s compliance procedures and requirements.
Additionally, individualized technical assistance is provided on an as -needed basis throughout a program year.
Activity Monitoring
All activities are monitored, beginning with a detailed review upon receipt of an application to determine eligibility, conformance with a National Objective and conformance with a Plan goal. This review also examines the proposed use of funds, eligibility of the service area, eligibility of the intended beneficiaries and likelihood of compliance with other federal requirements such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the System for Award Management (SAM) debarment list, prevailing wage, Minority and Women Business Enterprise, Section 3 and federal acquisition and relocation regulations, as applicable.
Subrecipients are required to submit an audit and other documentation to establish their capacity, and any findings noted in the audit are revie wed with the applicant.
Eligible applications are then considered for funding. Once funded, desk monitoring includes ongoing review of required quarterly performance reports. For CDBG public service activities, an on-site monitoring is conducted at least once every two years or yearly, or more frequently as needed to ensure compliance. These reviews include both a fiscal and programmatic review of the subrecipient’s activities. The reviews
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 112
determine if the subrecipient is complying with the program regulati ons and City contract. Areas routinely reviewed include overall administration, financial systems, appropriateness of program expenditures, program delivery, client eligibility determination and documentation, reporting systems, and achievement toward achieving contractual goals. Following the monitoring visit, a written report is provided delineating the results of the review and any findings of non- compliance and the required corrective action. Subrecipients normally have 30 days to provide the City with corrective actions taken to address any noted findings. Individualized technical assistance is provided, as noted above as soon as compliance concerns are identified.
For CDBG capital projects, monitoring also includes compliance with regulatory agreement requirements and may include annual monitoring to ensure renter occupied units’ household income, rent and utility allowance comply with applicable limits pursuant to the affordability covenant.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 113
2022-2023 Action Plan
AP-15 EXPECTED RESOURCES
During the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2026, the City of Victorville anticipates investing an estimated $7.2 million of CDBG funds to support the goals of this Strategic Plan. The annual allocation of CDBG, is subject to federal appropriations and changes in demographic data used in HUD’s formulas for each respective program.
For the 2022-2023 Program Year, the City expects to receive approximately $1,447,740 of CDBG funds. When combined with available prior year resources, the 2022-2023 Action Plan allocates about $1,683,386 of CDBG funds to program activities that will be implemented from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023.
Program Uses of Funds
Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected
Amount
Available
Remainder
of Con
Plan
Narrative
Description Annual
Allocation
Program
Income
Prior Year
Resources Total
CDBG
Acquisition
Admin and
Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public
Services
$1,447,740 TBD $272,115 $1,719,855 $5,790,960
Based on
2021-2022
FY
allocation
from HUD.
HOME Housing;
rehabilitation,
construction
$538,967 TBD $0.00 $538,967 $2,160,000
Based on
2021-2022
FY
allocation
from HUD
Table 26 - Anticipated Resources
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied.
The City does not require programs/ projects to provide matching funds. However, it is common for CDBG funded cons truction projects to include the use of non -federal funds.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 114
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
The City of Victorville is undertaking several initiatives to address homelessness and housing instability. In December 2021, the City announced it was awarded a $28 million Homekey award from the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the construction and operational suppo rt of its Wellness Center Campus. The campus is a critical component of the City’s strategy to reduce homelessness. Combining a low-barrier emergency shelter, recuperative care facility, medical clinic, interim housing, and wraparound support services. Con struction is expected to begin in 2022.
Discussion
The City of Victorville shares overall responsibility for meeting the priority needs identified in the Strategic Plan with many other organizations. The City is responsible for using CPD entitlement funds to address the needs of low- and moderate-income residents. Other City departments and organizations provide services to low - and moderate-income residents by utilizing funding from federal, state, local and private resources.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 115
AP-20 ANNUAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goals Summary Information
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geograp
hic Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
Goal 1
Provide suitable
living
environments
for residents
2022 –
2023
Affordable
Housing
Homeless
Non-
Homeless
Special
Needs
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Citywide Supportive
services for
the homeless
and those at
risk of
homelessness
Human
services
CDBG:
$517,161
Public service
activities for
low/ moderate
income
housing
benefit: 500
people, 10
households,
1 structure
Description: Support the development of “one stop” resource centers to assist homeless persons to acquire the necessary documentation and consultation (mental and physical health, nutrition, job skills training, identification, social security and disability benefits, etc.) to achieve reentry into employment and housing; food and nutrition services; utility assistance; support for the Homeless Outreach Proactive Enforcement (HOPE) program; support public safety efforts; provide resource directories for all available services; and encourage collaboration between agencies, faith-based organizations and other stakeholder to unify services.
Goal 2
Decent and
affordable
housing for
consortia
residents
2022 –
2023
Affordable
Housing
Citywide Housing
programs
CDBG:
$491,031
Homeowner
housing
rehabilitation:
60 household
housing units
Description: Transitional shelters; affordable housing for multi-family, single family, veterans; rehabilitation owner-occupied and rental; down payment assistance; code enforcement activity to improve neighborhood aesthetics and values; reduce overcrowding in occupied properties; consider establishing rent control for affordability; encourage collaboration between public agencies, developers, investors and other stakeholder to develop a wide range of housing development.
Goal 3
Expand access
to essential
services and
amenities
2022 –
2023
Non-housing
community
development
Citywide Accessibility
and mobility
Economic
Development
CDBG:
$150,000
Public Facility
of
Infrastructure
other than Low
/ Moderate-
Income
Housing
Benefit: 10
people
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 116
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geograp
hic Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
Description: Develop and support efforts to improve mobility within the community and to points outside of the community, from expansion of paved sidewalks and streets to partnerships with public and privately -owned shared transportation services from buses to cars, to bikes and scooters.
Economic Development activities will include commercial rehabilitation, which includes exterior improvements and code compliance; micro-enterprise development to include training and technical assistance and other support services to increase the capacity of grantees to carry out microenterprise activities; water and sewer projects.
Businesses: 10
business
Goal 4
Administration
2022
-
2023
All Citywide All CDBG:
$289,548
Description: Provide for the timely and compliant administration of the CDBG, ESG, and HOME programs in accordance with HUD policy and federal regulations. HUD requires the City to represent Administration funds as a “goal” within the Strategic Plan so that the sources of funds (refer to Section SP-35) are fully allocated to goals.
Table 27 – Goals Summary
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 117
AP-35 PROJECTS
Introduction
To address the high priority needs identified in the Strategic Plan, the City of Victorville will invest CDBG, funds in projects that preserve existing affordable housing, provide fair housing services, provide services to low - and moderate -income resident s including youth and seniors, provide services to residents with special needs, prevent homelessness and improve City public facilities. Together, these projects will address the needs of low- and moderate-income Victorville residents. 2022-2023 Projects
1. Operation School Bell
2. Improving the Education Outcomes of Victorville Foster Youth
3. Youth Drop in Center - Fam Spot
4. Behavioral Health Care
5. Homeless Shelter and Homeless Related Services
6. Fair Housing Services
7. MMK 21st Century Learning Education Enrichment Academies
8. Resources and Referrals for Families
9. Victims of Violence Program
10. Food and Disaster Relief Program for Disabled and Special Needs
11. Recreational/Educational/Arts Program for Special Needs
12. A Better Way
13. Fire Sprinkler System for Homeless Shelter
14. Route 66 Old Downtown Economic and Community Revitalization
15. Senior and Disabled Adult Home Repairs
16. Blight Abatement
17. Code Enforcement
18. Demolition
19. Residential Rehabilitation Program
22. Program Administration
Table 28 – Project Information
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 118
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs
Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non-administrative CDBG investments for program year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people throughout the City. The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate-income people include lack of funding from federal, state, and other local sources.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 119
AP-38 PROJECT SUMMARY
1 Project Name Operation School Bell
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $23,639
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
300 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Clothing for school aged children
2 Project Name Improving the Education Outcomes of Victorville Foster Youth Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $10,000
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
28 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Advocate representation for foster youth and wards of the state 3 Project Name Youth Drop in Center - Fam Spot
Target Area Citywide
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 120
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $11,820
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
50 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
After school youth program for 12- to 21-year-olds
4 Project Name Behavioral Health Care
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $19,699
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
110 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Provide behavioral health for foster youth and their foster families 5 Project Name Homeless Shelter and Homeless Related Services Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness
Funding CDBG: $31,515
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 121
Description High Desert Homeless Services, Inc. assist homeless residents of the Victor Valley area and high desert by providing shelter and shelter related services, while they work towards regaining independence and a stable household. Services include but are not limited to shelter, meals, clothing hygiene items, telephone access, showers, and laundry facilities. Residents can attend life skill classes that include budgeting, parenting, computer classes, job search and resume writing. Childcare is provided to the residents while they attend the classes and search for job or permanent housing.
Additionally, the shelter provides showers including hygiene items to the homeless living on the streets. Showers are available on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.
Clothing is provided to those in need on Wednesdays and Thursdays from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
150 people will be assisted
Location
Description
14049 Amargosa Road, Victorville, CA 92392
Planned
Activities
Homeless shelter operations
6 Project Name Fair Housing Services
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $28,000
Description Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) will intake and process fair housing and landlord tenant complaints for Victorville residents. Victorville residents will receive fair housing and landlord - tenant information, education, and mediation to assist in resolving complaints. Complaints of housing discrimination will be analyzed and investigated to determine if fair housing violations have occurred. In addition, IFHMB will provide technical assistance including training in fair housing to City officials and staff to bring awareness of HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing requirements.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
180 people will be assisted
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 122
Location
Description
1500 S. Haven Ave., Ste. 100, Ontario, CA 91761
Planned
Activities
Fair Housing services and landlord/tenant mediation
7 Project Name MMK 21st Century Learning Education Enrichment Academies Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $10,000
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
100 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Free academies programs in science, technology engineering, arts and math
8 Project Name Resources and Referrals for Families
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $20,369
Description Moses House Ministries provides emergency and/or program intake resources and referrals to Victorville residents that are pregnant or low-income families with children under the age of five in need of resources.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
600 people will be assisted
Location
Description
15180 Anacapa Road, Victorville, CA 92392
Planned
Activities
Emergency resources and ongoing services to families with small children
9 Project Name Victims of Violence Program
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 123
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $15,760
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
1,400 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Provide crisis intervention, education and safety information for victims of sexual assault
10 Project Name Food and Disaster Relief Program for Disabled and Special Needs Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $10,895
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
180 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Provide food three times a week to families who provide proof of disability
11 Project Name Recreational/Educational/Arts Program for Special Needs Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $11,825
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 124
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
200 people will be assisted
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Exercise, cooking and art classes for people with special needs 12 Project Name A Better Way
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Human services
Funding CDBG: $23,639
Description Victor Valley Domestic Violence will provide services to victims of domestic violence and their children. Services include emergency shelter, transitional housing, life skill classes, transportation, childcare and counseling.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
200 people will be assisted
Location
Description
14114 Hesperia, CA 92395
Planned
Activities
Support services for victims of domestic violence
13 Project Name Fire Sprinkler System for Homeless Shelter Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Expand access to essential services and amenities
Needs
Addressed
Accessibility and mobility
Funding CDBG: $300,000
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 125
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
100 people
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Installation of fire sprinklers in shelter's administration and dorm buildings
14 Project Name Route 66 Old Downtown Economic and Community Revitalization Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Expand access to essential services and amenities
Needs
Addressed
Funding CDBG: $150,000
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
10 businesses
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
Funds will be used to increase business and job opportunity 15 Project Name Senior and Disabled Adult Home Repairs
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Decent and affordable housing for consortia residents
Needs
Addressed
Housing programs
Funding CDBG: $34,000
Description The program performs repairs of health and welfare issues for senior citizens and disabled residents.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
50 households
Location
Description
Multiple throughout the city
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 126
Planned
Activities
Minor home repair program to address health and safety issues 16 Project Name Blight Abatement
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Housing programs
Funding CDBG: $104,000
Description The Residential Compliance program is designed to assist income eligible property owners that have been cited to address existing Building or Sanitary code violations.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
20 structures
Location
Description
Multiple throughout the city
Planned
Activities
Abatement of illegal dumping, secure vacant structures
17 Project Name Code Enforcement
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Housing programs
Funding CDBG: $250,000
Description The program is designed to proactively implement municipal and State codes in order to maintain suitable living environments for the residents.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
100 households
Location
Description
Multiple throughout the city
Planned
Activities
Implementation of municipal and state housing codes
18 Project Name Demolition
Target Area Citywide
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 127
Goals
Supported
Provide suitable living environments for residents
Needs
Addressed
Housing programs
Funding CDBG: $175,145.72
Description The Demolition and Abatement program removes dangerous structures and hazardous conditions along with abating illegally dumped trash and securing vacant/nuisance structures.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
7 structures
Location
Description
Multiple throughout the city
Planned
Activities
Demolition of unsafe structures
19 Project Name Residential Rehabilitation Program
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Decent and affordable housing for consortia residents
Needs
Addressed
Housing programs
Funding CDBG: $163,531; Any program income received during the 2022-2023 will be reallocated to the Residential Rehabilitation Program.
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
10 households
Location
Description
Multiple throughout the city
Planned
Activities
Rehabilitation of residential units to address health and safety issues and curb appeal
20 Project Name Administration
Target Area Citywide
Goals
Supported
Needs
Addressed
Funding CDBG: $289,548
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 128
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and
type of families
that will benefit
Location
Description
Planned
Activities
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 129
AP-50 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed
The City of Victorville’s 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan did not identify specific areas of low-income and minority concentration. All CDBG funds will be directed toward activities benefitting low- and moderate-income residents citywide.
Target Area Percentage of Funds
Citywide 100%
Table 29 - Geographic Distribution
Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically Not applicable.
Discussion
Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non-administrative CDBG investments for program year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate-income people citywide.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 130
AP-85 OTHER ACTIONS
Introduction
The City’s planned investment of CDBG, funds through the 2022-2023 Action Plan will address obstacles to fostering development of and maintaining existing affordable housing; evaluating and reducing lead-based paint hazards; reducing the number of families living in at or below the poverty line; developing institutional structure; and enhanced coordination among collaborative agencies and organizations.
Additionally, this section will identify obstacles to meeting underserved populations needs and propose action to overcome those obstacles.
Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low - and moderate - income people include lack of funding from federal, state and other local sources, and the high cost of housing that is not affordable to low -income people. To address this obstacle, at least in part, the City is investing CDBG funds in local nonprofit organizations to address the public service needs of those who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, or have incomes that are extremely low-, low-, or moderate.
The City will continue offering low -interest loans or emergency grants to low - and moderate-income Victorville homeowners using CDBG funds. The Residential Rehabilitation Program provides financing for home improvements necessary to ensure that residents can continue to live in quality housing that is already affordable to the occupants.
To address underserved needs, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non - administrative CDBG funds in Program Year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people or people presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate-income.
The City will invest over $200,000 in Program Year 2022-2023 in support of ten unique local nonprofit organizations providing services to low - and mode rate-income households.
Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing During the 202 2-2023 Program Year, the City will use CDBG funds to continue preserving and maintaining existing affordable housing through the Residential Rehabilitation and the Senior and Disabled Adult Home Repairs Programs . The City will continue to participate in the Apple Valley -Victorville HOM E Consortium, an effective way of providing more housing resources to residents. Specifically, the Consortium will support the City’s Senior Housing Repair Program with HOME funds in FY 2022-2023.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 131
Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards
The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing -based approaches. To reduce lead -based paint hazards, the City of Victorville Residential Rehabilitation Program will conduct lead-based paint testing and risk assessments for each property assisted that was built prior to January 1, 1978, and will incorporate safe work practices or abatement into the scope of work as required to reduce lead -based paint hazards in accordance with 24 CFR Part 35.
Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families The implementation of CDBG activities meeting the goals established in the Consolidated Plan-Strategic Plan and this Action Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty-level families by:
• Supporting activities that increase the supply of housing that is affordable to low- and moderate-income households;
• Supporting a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent and eliminate homelessness;
• Supporting housing prese rvation programs that ensure low -income households have a safe, decent and appropriate place to live; and • Supporting public services through various nonprofits funded by CDBG that serve the community’s youth, seniors, families, veterans and residents with special needs.
The City will invest CDBG and HOME funds during the 2022 -2023 Program Year to address high priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan including supportive services of the homeless and those at risk of homelessness, human services, and housing programs. The City will also invest CDBG funds to address individuals and families with special needs.
To address incidences of homelessness City will use CDBG to finance life and safety upgrades and shelter operations for High Desert Homeless Services , additionally Consortium HOME funds will finance the development of additional transitional housing beds through Hughes Training and Development . To address the needs of those with special needs the City will direct CDBG funds to Rockn’ Our Disabilities nutritional support and arts and wellness programming targeted toward those with disabilities. To address the housing needs of the elderly and those with disabilities the City and the HOME Consortium will fund housing rehab pro gram targeted to these populations.
Actions planned to develop institutional structure
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 132
The institutional delivery system in Victorville is best represented through the collaboration between local government and an outstanding set of nonprofit organizations that carry out a diverse array of human service programs to enrich the lives of residents. These relationships are collaborative—each organization partnering with the next to ensure that all Victorville residents have the support necessary to lead fulfilling lives. Affordable housing development and preservation activities will be carried out by the City in partnership with housing developers and contractors.
Guided by the Strategic Plan, public service activities will be carried out by nonprofit organizations and City d epartments to serve low - and moderate-income residents.
The City will collaborate across departments on city -owned public facilities improvements and will partner closely with nonprofit organizations receiving capital improvement funds to ensure their projects are delivered on time, within budget, and in compliance with all federal, state, and local regulations.
Through technical assistance and the annual Notice of Funding Availability process commencing each November, the City continues to develop and expand local institutional structure by strengthening existing partnerships and leveraging the experience of organizations that previously have not participated in locally administered federal programs to expand the number of program offerings available to residents. The City consistently funds a variety of high-quality services that address underserved needs in Victorville.
Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies
To enhance coordina tion between public and private housing and social service agencies, the City will welcome and encourage the participation of a wide variety of agencies and organizations that deliver housing and supportive services that add value to the lives of low- and moderate-income residents in Victorville.
Discussion
In the implementation of the 20 22-2023 Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG and HOME resources to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs, foster and maintain affordable housing, reduce lead-based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty-level families, develop institutional structure, and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies.
DRAFT Consolidated Plan VICTORVILLE 133
AP-90 PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Introduction
In the implementation of programs and activities under the 202 2-2023 Action Plan, the City of Victorville will follow all HUD regulations concerning the use of program income, forms of investment, overall low- and moderate-income benefit for the CDBG program
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out.
1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0
2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0
3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0
4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0
5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0
Total Program Income: 0
Other CDBG Requirements
1. The amount of urgent need activities 0
2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low- and moderate-income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low- and moderate-income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100.00%
Discussion
In the implementation of programs and activities under the 20 22-2023 Action Plan, the City of Victorville will monitor all subrecipients for compliance with HUD regulations and provide technical assistance as nec essary to ensure successful implementation. During FY 2021-2022 eight activities did not spend their entire allocation making about $272,115 available to reallocate to eligible projects during FY 2022-2023.
Draft 2022 Analysis of
Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice
This page is intentionally left blank.
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
Debra Jones
Mayor
Leslie Irving
Mayor Pro Tem
Elizabeth Becerra
Council Member
Blanca Gomez
Council Member
This page is intentionally left blank.
i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Fair Housing Issues ......................................................................................................................... 2 Apple Valley ............................................................................................................................... 2 Victorville ................................................................................................................................... 5 Demographic Summary .................................................................................................................. 8 Segregation/Integration ................................................................................................................. 16 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 16 Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty ............................................................... 26 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 26 Disparities in Access to Opportunity ............................................................................................ 28 Educational Opportunities ........................................................................................................ 28 Employment Opportunities ....................................................................................................... 32 Transportation Opportunities .................................................................................................... 42 Low Poverty Exposure Opportunities ....................................................................................... 49 Environmentally Healthy Neighborhood Opportunities ........................................................... 53 Patterns in Disparities in Access to Opportunity ...................................................................... 57 Disproportionate Housing Needs .................................................................................................. 58 Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 58
1 Executive Summary
The Town of Apple Valley was incorporated in 1988 and consists of 78 square miles. According to the 2020 Census, the population of the Town is approximately 76,000 people. The City of Victorville was incorporated in 1962 and encompasses 74 square miles. According to the 2020 Census, approximately 135,000 people live in the City. Since 1997, both cities have received an annual allocations of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U. S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
In 2003, the Town of Apple Valley and City of Victorville formed the HOME Investment Partnership Program Consortium (the “HOME Consortium”) in order to meet the threshold of obtaining HOME entitlement status with HUD. Both the City and the Town receive CDBG and HOME funding annually. For the purpose of this Assessment to Fair Housing (AFH), the Town of Apple Valley and the City of Victorville may be collectively referenced as “Communities” and “Jurisdictions”.
As Entitlement Jurisdictions, both the City and Town are required to prepare and adopt a Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) and an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (AI) to assist the Communities in identifying fair housing issues, contributing factors, and goals in order to affirmatively further fair housing. Below is a summary of the fair housing issues, significant contributing factors, and fair housing goals. Also included is an overview of the process and analysis used to identify the fair housing issues and to reach the goals.
To conduct the Analysis of Impediments for Apple Valley and Victorville, the Jurisdictions gathered and analyzed data for each jurisdiction and the region. The region is defined as the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metropolitan Statistical Area, which comprises Riverside County and San Bernardino County. The data utilized are from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS), HUD’s AFFH Data and Mapping Tool, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, and stakeholder surveys conducted as part of the Con Plan process. The data are generally from the most recent available years, with the exception of the ACS data, which are from the 2013-2017 estimates in order to align with the data utilized in the Con Plan.
Analyzed data topics include:
• Demographic
• Housing
• Segregation/ Integration
• Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty • Disparities in Access to Opportunity
2 Fair Housing Issues
Apple Valley
Overview
According to the data analysis summarized in this document, Apple Valley residents in general have relatively low access to high performing schools and employment opportunities, and relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, Black and Hispanic residents (especially those living below the poverty line), residents of Mexican origin, and families with children, are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high performing schools, high labor force participation, and high levels of human capital. These groups are also more likely to live in neighborhoods where they are exposed to poverty.
These challenges are all present in Census tract 0097.16, which is in the center of the jurisdiction and is defined by HUD as a racially or ethnically concentrated area of poverty (R/ECAP). Per HUD, R/ECAPs are Census tracts that meet both of the following criteria: a non-White population of 50 percent or more, and a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or a poverty rate that is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower. Census tract 0097.16 has relatively low performing schools, low levels of labor force participation and human capital, and high levels of poverty. The analysis shows that Black residents, families with children, and residents born in Mexico disproportionately reside in this area.
Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board is the primary organization providing fair housing assistance and support within the region. As summarized in Table 1 – Housing Discrimination Cases by Protected Class, 2011-2021 below, the most common fair housing case documented by both Apple Valley and Victorville is related to disability. The second most common issue is race and the third is sex.
Table 1 – Housing Discrimination Cases by Protected
Class, 2011-2021
Protected Class Cases in Apple
Valley
Cases in
Victorville
Age 6 8
Ancestry
Arbitrary 3 11
Color 3
Disability 168 314
Familial Status 4 14
Marital Status 1
National Origin 3 10
Race 21 80
Religion 2 1
3 Sex 22 25
Sexual
Orientation 1 2
Source of Income 4 16
Grand Total 235 484
Source: Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board
Segregation
• Compared to the region and Victorville, Apple Valley has relatively few Hispanic, Limited English Proficiency, and Foreign-Born residents, and compared to Victorville, Apple Valley also has relatively few Black residents (see Table 2 – Demographics and Table 3 – Demographic Trends).
• Mexican-born residents are the only foreign-born population group present in the Census tracts in the center of the jurisdiction, including in the R/ECAP (Census tract 0097.16).
Access to Opportunities and Exposure to Adverse Community Factors:
• R/ECAPs:
o Census tract 0097.16, in the center of the jurisdiction, is classified as a R/ECAP (see Map 1). Black residents of Apple Valley disproportionately reside in the R/ECAP: while Black residents only make up 7.7% of the jurisdiction’s total population, 15.33% of the R/ECAP population is Black. Additionally, families with children and residents born in Mexico also disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. (See Table 2 – Demographics and Table 7 – R/ECAP Demographics) • Access to high-performing schools:
o Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line are least likely of any racial/ethnic group to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
o Among foreign-born residents, those born in Mexico appear to be least likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools (see Map 7). This is related to the fact that residents born in Mexico disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs (See Table 2 – Demographics and Table 7 – R/ECAP Demographics). o Families with children appear less likely to live in neighborhoods with high- performing schools than families without children (see Map 7). This is related to the fact that families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs (See Table 2 – Demographics and Table 7 – R/ECAP Demographics). • Employment opportunities:
o Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
o In the areas with the best access to employment centers and the highest levels of labor force participation and human capital, there are relatively few residents of
4 Mexican origin compared to other National Origin groups, or families with children compared to other types of families, indicating that these groups have less access to neighborhoods with employment opportunities (see Map 8 and Map 9).
• Access to transportation:
o Native Americans living below the poverty line experience the least access to public transit and the highest transportation costs of any group (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
• Exposure to poverty:
o While all residents have relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods, the following groups are most likely to live in neighborhoods with relatively high exposure to poverty (this is related to the fact that these groups disproportionately reside in the R/ECAP area):
Hispanic and Black residents (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
Mexican-born residents and families with children (see Map 12).
Housing Issues
• According to Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, the majority of fair housing complaints received in the jurisdiction are related to residents with a disability seeking reasonable accommodations (see Table 1 – Housing Discrimination Cases by Protected Class, 2011-2021).
• Over half of renters are cost-burdened, meaning they use more than 30% of their income to pay for housing-related costs. The percentage of all renters who are cost burdened is decreasing, however the number of cost-burdened renters is increasing (see Table 4 – Housing Trends).
• Native American, Hispanic, and Black households are significantly less likely than White, Non-Hispanic or Asian/Pacific Islander households to own their own homes (see Table 11 – Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity).
Possible Future Fair Housing Concerns:
• A small but increasing proportion of the population has limited English proficiency. The main language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” is Spanish (see Table 2 – Demographics, Table 3 – Demographic Trends, and Table 6 - Language Spoken at Home).
• The population is aging. The proportion of the population that is over age 65 is increasing (see Table 3 – Demographic Trends).
• According to the Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Index, while racial/ethnic segregation in Apple Valley remains low, it has been increasing since 1990, especially between White and Black residents (see Table 5 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends).
5 Victorville
Overview
According to the data analysis, all Victorville residents, regardless of protected class status, have relatively low access to high-performing schools, relatively low access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital, and relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, there is evidence that different protected class groups face specific challenges regarding access to opportunities and exposure to adverse community factors. For example:
• Native Americans, particularly those living below the poverty line, appear to be least successful in accessing employment in Victorville. According to ACS data, Native Americans have the lowest labor force participation rate and the highest unemployment rate of any group.
• Asian/Pacific Islander residents have slightly less access to public transit and face slightly higher transportation costs, which may be related to the fact that more residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin live outside the areas with the best access to public transit and the lowest costs, than live inside those areas. • Hispanic residents, residents born in Mexico, and families with children disproportionately reside in racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs), which HUD defines as Census tracts that meet both of the following criteria:
a non-White population of 50 percent or more, and a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or a poverty rate that is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower.
Segregation
• Mexican-born residents appear to be the predominant foreign-born group in the city’s central neighborhoods, while there appear to be higher concentrations of Asian-born residents in the southeastern Census tracts.
Access to Opportunities and Exposure to Adverse Community Factors • R/ECAPs:
o Census tracts 0098 and 0099.05, along the eastern edge of the jurisdiction, are classified as R/ECAPs, as are Census tracts 0091.17 and 0091.16, which are partially within northern Victorville (see Map 1). Hispanic residents, residents born in Mexico, and families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs (see Table 2 - Demographics and Table 7 – R/ECAP Demographics). • Employment opportunities:
o Native Americans, and particularly those living below the poverty line, may be least successful in accessing employment in Victorville: Native Americans have the lowest Labor Market Index value of any group, and Native Americans below
6 the poverty line have the lowest Jobs Proximity Index value of any group (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
• Access to transportation:
o Asian and Pacific Islander residents have slightly less access to public transit and face slightly higher transportation costs than other groups (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity). This disparity may be related to the fact that, as shown on Map 10 and Map 11, a larger number of residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin live outside the areas with the best access to public transit and the lowest costs, than live inside those areas (see Map 10 and Map 11).
• Exposure to poverty:
o While all residents have relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods, Asian and Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the highest exposure to poverty (see Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity).
Housing Issues
• According to Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, the majority of fair housing complaints received in the jurisdiction are related to residents with a disability seeking reasonable accommodations (see Table 1 – Housing Discrimination Cases by Protected Class, 2011-2021).
• Over half of renters are cost-burdened, meaning they use more than 30% of their income to pay for housing-related costs. The percentage of all renters who are cost burdened is decreasing, however the number of cost-burdened renters is increasing (see Table 4 – Housing Trends).
• Black households are significantly less likely than other households to own their own homes. Hispanic and Native American households are also less likely than White, Non- Hispanic or Asian/Pacific Islander households to be homeowners (see Table 11 – Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity).
Possible Future Fair Housing Concerns:
• An increasing proportion of the population has limited English proficiency. The main language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” is Spanish (see Table 2 – Demographic, Table 3 – Demographic Trends, and Table 6 - Language Spoken at Home).
Fair Housing Goals
Many of the fair housing issues summarized above are largely driven by private market forces over which the Community Development programs have limited control. However, both Apple
7 Valley and Victorville are firmly committed to promoting access to fair housing and affirmatively furthering fair housing through all of their programs and activities.
To promote fair housing, the following goals have been established for Apple Valley and Victorville.
Goal Program Marketing
Description Both jurisdictions shall ensure that all HUD-funded programs are marketed in high poverty areas within their jurisdiction in manners that will be accessible to residents to ensure that low-income residents and high poverty neighborhoods have best access to all program activities.
Evaluation To evaluate this goal, each jurisdiction shall maintain documentation showing that it marketed programs in areas of high poverty and conducted such marketing in a way that clearly communicated the program to the residents in those areas.
Goal Target Non-Housing Activities in Areas of High Poverty Description Both jurisdictions shall use CDBG funds to carry out non-housing activities (such as public works, public services, and economic development) in areas of high poverty. This may include carrying out activities citywide, but promoting services in those areas or electing to target activities in these areas.
Evaluation To evaluate this goal, each jurisdiction shall report in the CAPER how its activities promoted anti-poverty goals and objectives.
Goal Monitor and Apply for Federal and State Funding to Increase Community Development and Housing Activities
Description Both jurisdictions shall actively monitor new funding opportunities for additional community development and affordable housing activities. Unless there is specific justification not to apply, the jurisdictions shall apply for these funding streams.
Evaluation To evaluate this goal, each jurisdiction shall maintain a log of new Federal and State funding streams that are available to promote affordable housing and community development.
Goal Promote Fair Housing Education for Tenants and Homebuyers Description Both jurisdictions shall fund and promote fair housing training for tenants, homebuyers and potential homebuyers to ensure that residents are fully informed of their rights as it relates to housing.
Evaluation Maintain records of number of trainings conducted and training participants.
Goal Promote Fair Housing Education for Landlords and Realtors
8 Description Both jurisdictions shall fund and promote fair housing training for landlords and realtors to ensure that they understand the fair housing requirements and rights of tenants and homebuyers. .
Evaluation Maintain records of number of trainings conducted and training participants.
Goal Maintain Fair Housing Resources on Website
Description In collaboration with the fair housing provider for the jurisdiction, maintain a page on the jurisdiction website that provides access to fair housing resources and documents. Further, collaborate with the fair housing provider to promote trainings and other fair housing related events.
Evaluation Review and update webpage resources annually with support from fair housing provider and maintain documentation of promoting all trainings and events carried out by the fair housing provider in the jurisdiction.
Goal Maintain Housing and Community Development Resources List
Description Establish and maintain a list of all housing and community development resources that is updated annually. This list may include services such as grant or loan programs for reasonable modifications and access to programs such as Meals on Wheels.
Evaluation Review and update list on an annual basis.
Demographic Summary
Describe demographic patterns in the jurisdiction and region and describe trends over time (since 1990).
Table 2 – Demographics, shows demographic information for the populations of Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. The region is defined as the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metropolitan Statistical Area, which comprises Riverside County and San Bernardino County.
Table 3 – Demographic Trends, shows similar data over time, going back to 1990.
Race/Ethnicity:
Apple Valley: As shown in Table 2, Apple Valley is a majority White, non-Hispanic jurisdiction. Just over half of Apple Valley’s population is White, non-Hispanic, approximately 35% are Hispanic, 7.7% are Black, and 3% are Asian or Pacific Islander. Over the past 30 years, Apple Valley has become less White. This trend has been driven by the growth of the Hispanic population, shown in Table 3.
9 Victorville: Victorville is a majority-minority city. Fifty-five percent of the population is Hispanic, 15% is Black, almost 4% is Asian or Pacific Islander, and 22% is White, Non- Hispanic. Over the past 30 years, Victorville’s population has increased due primarily to the growth of the Hispanic and Black populations. In 1990, the city was two-thirds White, Non- Hispanic. Since then, the White population has declined while the Black population more than quadrupled and the Hispanic population grew six-fold.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region: Apple Valley is a majority White, Non- Hispanic jurisdiction in a majority-minority region. Apple Valley has a much smaller percentage of Hispanic residents than either Victorville or the region. Victorville’s population, which is 55% Hispanic, looks more like the region, however, Victorville has a higher percentage of Black residents than either the region or Apple Valley. Both Apple Valley and Victorville have a smaller proportion of Asian or Pacific Islander residents than the region. Over the past 30 years, all three geographies have experienced population growth driven in part by increasing numbers of Hispanic residents. In Victorville and the region, the White, Non-Hispanic population also declined over this period, while in Apple Valley, the number of White, Non-Hispanic residents increased. As a result of these trends, Victorville and the region became majority Hispanic.
Apple Valley, in comparison, continues to be majority White, Non-Hispanic.
National Origin
Apple Valley: As shown in Table 2, the main country of origin for the foreign-born population in Apple Valley is Mexico. Residents born in Mexico comprise 3.34% of the population.
Residents from El Salvador and the Philippines each represent approximately 0.87% of the population of Apple Valley. Over the past 30 years, the foreign-born population in Apple Valley has grown from 5.55% of the population to over 9%.
Victorville: As shown in Table 2, the main country of origin for the foreign-born population in Victorville is Mexico, followed by El Salvador and the Philippines. Just over 10% of the population was born in Mexico. Over the past 30 years, the foreign-born population in Victorville has grown from about 10% of the population to nearly 18%.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region: The main country of origin for the foreign-born population in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region is Mexico. El Salvador and the Philippines are the second and third most common nations of origin for the foreign-born population in all three areas. In all three geographies, the proportion of the population that is foreign-born has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table 3. Table 2 and Table 3 also show that Apple Valley has had, and continues to have, a relatively small proportion of foreign-born residents when compared to both Victorville and the region. In the most current year shown in Table 3 (2017), 9.29% of Apple Valley residents were born outside the U.S., compared to 17.74% of Victorville residents and 21.37% of the regional population.
Limited English Proficiency
Apple Valley:
10 As shown in Table 2, the most common language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” in Apple Valley is Spanish.1 Over 3% of Apple Valley’s population has limited English proficiency (LEP) and uses Spanish as their primary language at home. The proportion of the population that speak English “less than very well” has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table 3.
Victorville:
The most common language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” in Victorville is Spanish. Over 10% of Victorville’s population has limited English proficiency (LEP) and uses Spanish as their primary language at home. The proportion of the population that speak English “less than very well” has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table
3. Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
As shown in Table 2, the most common language spoken among those who speak English “less than very well” in Apple Valley, Victorville. and the region is Spanish. Apple Valley has a smaller proportion of residents that have limited English proficiency (LEP) and use Spanish as their primary language at home, compared to Victorville and the region. In all three geographies, the proportion of the population that speak English “less than very well” has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in Table 3. Table 3 also shows that Apple Valley has a smaller proportion of LEP residents than either Victorville or the region, and Victorville has a slightly smaller proportion of LEP residents than the region. For the most current year shown in Table 3 (2017), 4.91% of Apple Valley residents, 12.22% of Victorville residents, and 15% of the region’s residents had limited English proficiency.
Disability
Apple Valley:
As shown in Table 2, the most common types of disabilities in Apple Valley are ambulatory difficulties (8.72% of the population has an ambulatory difficulty), followed by independent living difficulties (6.17% of the population) and cognitive difficulties (5.34% of the population).
Victorville:
The most common types of disabilities in Victorville are ambulatory difficulties (5.56% of the population has an ambulatory difficulty), followed by independent living difficulties (4.37% of the population) and cognitive difficulties (4.36% of the population).
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
The most significant disability types in all three geographies are the same: ambulatory, independent living, and cognitive difficulties. However, Apple Valley has higher rates of individuals living with disabilities than either Victorville or the region. Table 1 – Housing
1 The ACS does not provide 5-year estimates for all languages spoken by the population that speaks English “less than very well” after the 2011-2015 dataset. Instead, for later years, data is provided for those who speak Spanish, Other Indo-European languages, Asian and Pacific Islander languages, and Other languages. There are 1-year estimates through 2019 that provide more specificity regarding languages spoken, but these estimates are not available for Apple Valley. For this reason, Table 2 uses the AFFH data provided by HUD, which is from the 2011- 2015 ACS, with the exception of data for Spanish speakers, which is taken from the 2013-2017 ACS table S1601.
11 Discrimination Cases by Protected Class, 2011-2021, below, shows housing discrimination cases by protected class for the ten-year period between 2011-2021. These data, provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, show the large majority of fair housing complaints received in each jurisdiction are related to residents living with a disability.
Table 1 – Housing Discrimination Cases by Protected
Class, 2011-2021
Protected Class Cases in Apple
Valley
Cases in
Victorville
Age 6 8
Ancestry
Arbitrary 3 11
Color 3
Disability 168 314
Familial Status 4 14
Marital Status 1
National Origin 3 10
Race 21 80
Religion 2 1
Sex 22 25
Sexual
Orientation 1 2
Source of Income 4 16
Grand Total 235 484
Source: Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board
Age
Apple Valley:
As shown in Table 2, 26.35% of Apple Valley’s population is younger than 18, 56.48% are between 18-64 years old, and 17.16% are 65 years or older.
Victorville:
As shown in Table 2, 32.39% of Victorville’s population is younger than 18, 58.59% are between 18-64 years old, and 9.02% are 65 years or older.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
As shown in Table 2, compared to Apple Valley and the region, Victorville has a relatively young population: Victorville has a smaller proportion of residents over the age of 65 years and a larger proportion of residents under the age of 18. Compared to the region, Apple Valley has a relatively old population. This is reflected in the data on the median age of residents: according to ACS data, the median age in Apple Valley is 37.2 years, the median age in the region is 34 years, and the median age in Victorville is 29.6. Over the past 30 years, the populations in both Apple Valley and the region have been getting older, while the population in Victorville has been getting younger. Table 3 shows that the percentage of the population that is under 18 has been
12 declining in Apple Valley and the region, and increasing in Victorville, while the opposite is true for the population aged 65 years and older in all three places.
Family Type
Apple Valley:
As shown in Table 2, in Apple Valley, the percentage of all family households that have children under the age of 18 living with them is 41.07%.
Victorville:
As shown in Table 2, in Victorville, the percentage of all family households that have children under the age of 18 living with them is 52.05%.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
As shown in Table 2, Victorville has a higher proportion of families with children than the region, and the region has a higher proportion of families with children than Apple Valley. In all three geographies, the proportion of families that have children is lower than it was in 1990, as shown in Table 3.
13 Describe housing patterns in the jurisdiction and region, including tenure, cost burden, and the location of renters and owners.
Tenure
Table 4 – Housing Trends, below, shows data on housing tenure and cost burden for Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. These data are from the 2008-2012 and 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, the number of housing units increased by about 1,000 units, from 22,975 to 23,911, due entirely to an increase in rental housing units. The number and share of owner- occupied housing units declined over this period, however, the majority of housing remains owner-occupied (64.81% of units were owner-occupied in 2017).
Victorville:
In Victorville, the number of housing units increased by about 1,500 units, from 31,186 to 32,629, due entirely to an increase in rental housing units. The number and share of owner- occupied housing units declined over this period. While the majority of housing remains owner- occupied (53.54% of units were owner-occupied in 2017), if these trends continue, rental housing will soon comprise the majority of housing in the city.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
In all three geographies, the total number of housing units is increasing, and most of the housing remains owner-occupied. Over the five-year period between 2012 and 2017, however, the number and share of owner-occupied housing decreased in all three places. Victorville has a higher share of rental housing units compared to Apple Valley and the region. Of all three places, Apple Valley has the highest homeownership rate.
Cost Burden
Apple Valley:
As of 2017, over half of renters (53.03%) in Apple Valley were cost-burdened, meaning they used more than 30% of their monthly income to pay for housing-related costs. Among
14 homeowners, slightly less than 1/3 were cost-burdened. Over the five-year period between 2012 and 2017, the number and percentage of homeowners who were cost-burdened declined. Over the same period, the number of cost-burdened renters increased slightly, however the percentage of all renters who are cost-burdened declined, due to the larger increase in the total number of renters.
Victorville:
As of 2017, over half of renters (57.16%) in Victorville were cost-burdened. Among homeowners, about 1/3 were cost-burdened. Over the five-year period between 2012 and 2017, the number and percentage of homeowners who were cost-burdened declined. Over the same period, the number of cost-burdened renters increased, however the percentage of all renters who are cost-burdened declined, due to the larger increase in the total number of renters.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
In all three geographies, over half of all renters in were cost-burdened in 2017. Victorville had the highest rate of cost-burden among renters, followed by the region. Apple Valley renters were the least likely to be cost-burdened. In all three geographies, about 1/3 of homeowners were cost- burdened in 2017. Over the five-year period between 2012-2017, trends were similar across all three geographies: the number and percentage of cost-burdened homeowners decreased, perhaps reflecting the recovery from the Great Recession; and the percentage of renters who were cost- burdened decreased, however, the number of cost-burdened renter households increased.
Map 16 – Housing Tenure includes two maps showing the distribution of renter households in Apple Valley/Victorville and the region. The darker shaded areas have a higher proportion of renter households. The map of Apple Valley/Victorville shows a high concentration of renter households in two Census tracts in Apple Valley: 0097.16 in the center of the jurisdiction and 0097.10 in the southeast part of the jurisdiction. In Victorville, the Census tracts in the southeast part of the city have high concentrations of renters, as does the portion of Census tract 0091.16 that is inside Victorville’s northwest boundary. In the region, there are concentrations of renters in the southwest, as well as in Census tracts in the central and northern part of the region.
15 16
Segregation/Integration
Analysis
Describe and compare segregation levels in the jurisdiction and region.
Identify the racial/ethnic groups that experience the highest levels of segregation. Explain how these segregation levels have changed over time (since 1990).
Table 5 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends shows how segregated or integrated various racial/ethnic groups are in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region using a Dissimilarity Index, which is calculated using data from the 2010 Decennial Census. The Dissimilarity Index measures the degree to which two groups are evenly distributed across a geographic area and is commonly used for assessing residential segregation between two groups. Dissimilarity index values between 0 and 39 generally indicate high integration (low segregation), values between 40 and 54 generally indicate moderate segregation, and values between 55 and 100 generally indicate a high level of segregation.
Apple Valley:
As Table 5 shows, Apple Valley has relatively high levels of integration among White and Black, White and Hispanic, and White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents. Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents are the most integrated according to this metric, while Black and White residents are the least integrated. While integration is relatively high, over the past 30 years, Apple Valley has become more segregated, with segregation levels between Black and White residents increasing the most of any group.
Victorville:
Table 5 shows Victorville has relatively high levels of integration among the various race/ethnic groups. In Victorville, Hispanic and White residents are the most integrated and Black and White residents are the least integrated, according to this metric. Similar to Apple Valley, over the past 30 years, segregation levels have increased slightly overall. Segregation between Hispanic and White residents and between Asian or Pacific Islander and White residents increased, while segregation between Black and White residents decreased.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Apple Valley and Victorville, compared to the region, are more integrated than the surrounding jurisdictions and county. The Dissimilarity Index values show moderate levels of segregation between race/ethnic groups in the region, with Black and White residents experiencing the highest degree of segregation. Over the last few decades, as all three geographies have become less White and more Hispanic (as shown in Table 5), they have also become more segregated overall.
17 Identify areas with relatively high segregation and integration by race/ethnicity, national origin, or LEP group, and indicate the predominant groups living in each area. Discuss how patterns of segregation have changed over time (since 1990).
Map 1 – Race/Ethnicity shows the distribution of various racial/ethnic groups in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region—each dot represents 75 people, and the various racial/ethnic groups are represented by different colored dots. Map 2 – Race/Ethnicity Trends shows the same distribution at three different points in the past: 1990, 2000, and 2010. In these maps there are no apparent concentrations or separation of colored dots within Apple Valley or Victorville, indicating that residents of different racial/ethnic groups within each jurisdiction experience high levels of residential integration and have for the past few decades. However, the maps do clearly show the higher numbers of Hispanic and Black residents (represented by blue and green dots, respectively) in Victorville compared to Apple Valley, as well as the increase in Hispanic residents in Victorville over the past 30 years.
In the region, by comparison, Map 1 shows some areas of racial/ethnic concentration that align with the dissimilarity indices showing higher levels of segregation in the region than in Apple Valley or Victorville. While the maps are somewhat hard to read at this scale, there are areas on Map 1 where orange dots (representing White, Non-Hispanic residents) are clustered with few people of other racial/ethnic groups present. Map 2 shows the changing demographics over time, with an increasing number of Hispanic residents, represented by blue dots on the map, concentrated in certain parts of the region.
18 19
20 21
Map 3 – National Origin shows the distribution of foreign-born residents in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. On the maps, each dot represents 75 people, and the different colored
22 dots represent different countries of birth, for the 5 most populous groups of foreign-born residents. In Apple Valley, Mexican-born residents are present throughout the jurisdiction, however, in the Census tracts in the center of the jurisdiction they are the only foreign-born population group present. In Victorville, Mexican-born residents and residents born in the various Asian countries listed on the map are present throughout the city. However, Mexican- born residents appear to be the predominant foreign-born group in the city’s central neighborhoods, while there appear to be higher concentrations of Asian-born residents in the southeastern Census tracts. In the region, there are concentrations of residents born in Mexico in certain areas, as indicated by the dense concentrations of orange dots.
23 According to the 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (ACS), shown in Table 6 - Language Spoken at Home, below, 19.4% of Apple Valley residents over the age of 5 speak a language other than English at home, including 5.9% that speak English less than “very well”. Of those who speak English less than “very well”, the largest group is of those that speak Spanish: 4.5% of Apple Valley’s population has limited English proficiency and speaks Spanish at home.
In Victorville, 38.4% of residents over the age of 5 speak a language other than English at home, including 13.9% that speak English less than “very well”. Of those who speak English less than “very well”, the largest group is of those that speak Spanish: 11.6% of Victorville’s population has limited English proficiency and speaks Spanish at home.
24 Map 4 - LEP shows the distribution of residents in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region with Limited English Proficiency. On the maps, each dot represents 75 people, and the different colored dots represent languages spoken by individuals who speak English “less than very well,” for the 5 most common languages spoken by residents with limited English proficiency (LEP). In Apple Valley and Victorville, Spanish speakers appear to be distributed throughout the jurisdictions, while Tagalog speakers appear to live in Census tracts on the western edge of each jurisdiction. In the region, Spanish speakers seem to be concentrated in certain areas as shown by the groupings of orange dots.
25 Consider and describe the location of owner and renter occupied housing in determining whether such housing is located in segregated or integrated areas.
The analysis above shows that Apple Valley and Victorville residents of various race/ethnicity, national origin, and LEP groups generally experience relatively high levels of residential integration across the jurisdiction. The only noticeable exception in Apple Valley is Census tract 0097.16, in the center of the jurisdiction, where the only foreign-born residents are those who were born in Mexico.
Discuss whether there are any demographic trends, policies, or practices that could lead to higher segregation in the jurisdiction in the future.
According to the above analysis, Apple Valley and Victorville have become more diverse over the past few decades and there is reason to believe this trend will continue. Over the same period, segregation in Apple Valley has increased and may continue to do so as the jurisdiction diversifies further. In Victorville, segregation between Hispanic and White, and between Asian or Pacific Islander and White residents, has also increased over this period. These trends may continue if the city’s demographics continue to change. Both Apple Valley and Victorville actively evaluate policies to limit policies that may directly or inadvertently result in segregation within the jurisdictions.
26 Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of
Poverty
Analysis
Identify any R/ECAPs or groupings of R/ECAP tracts within the jurisdiction.
HUD defines racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs) as Census tracts that meet both of the following criteria:
• a non-White population of 50 percent or more, and
• a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or a poverty rate that is three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower.
As shown in Map 1, below, in Apple Valley, Census tract 0097.16, in the center of the jurisdiction, is classified as a R/ECAP—this is shown by the pink outline. In Victorville, Census tracts 0098 and 0099.05, along the eastern edge of the jurisdiction, are classified as R/ECAPs.
Additionally, Census tracts 0091.17 and 0091.16, which are partially within northern Victorville, are also classified as R/ECAPs.
Which protected classes disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs compared to the jurisdiction and region?
27 Table 7 – R/ECAP Demographics, includes details on the race/ethn icity, family type, and national origin of residents living in R/ECAPs in Apple Valley , Victorville, and the region.
By comparing the demographic data in Table 2 - Demographics (on page 12) to Table 7, below, we can identify which protected class groups disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs— generally speaking, if the percentage of a particular class living in R/ECAPs is higher than the percentage of the total population they represent, we can say they disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. For example, in Apple Valley, Black residents only make up 7.7% of the jurisdiction’s total population, yet 15.33% of the R/ECAP population is Black. This indicates that Black residents of Apple Valley disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. Additionally, in Apple Valley, families with children and residents born in Mexico also disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. In Victorville, Hispanic residents, residents born in Mexico, and families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. In the region, Black and H ispanic residents, Mexican -born residents, and families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs.
Describe how R/ECAPs have changed over time (since 1990).
According to Map 2 (on pages 19 -21), which shows demographics in Apple Valley , Victorville, and the region at three different points in time (1990, 2000, and 2010), there were no R/ECAPs in Apple Valley or Victorville in 1990, but in 2000, tract 0098 in Victorville was classified as a R/ECAP . According to Map 1 (on page 26) , in 2010, tract 0098 in
28 Victorville was still a R/ECAP and three more tracts in the city were classified as R/ECAPs.
In Apple Valley, Census tract 0097.16 was classified as a R/ECAP in 2010.2 Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Educational Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to proficient schools based on race/ethnicity, national origin, and family status.
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a School Proficiency Index, which measures the proximity various racial/ethnic groups have, based on where they live, to neighborhoods with high-performing schools. School proficiency is measured using school-level data on the performance of 4th grade students on state exams. The index is based on a range of 0 to 100 with higher values indicating better proximity to high-performing schools.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, there is some disparity in access to high-performing schools by race/ethnicity.
Asian/Pacific Islander residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools (with an index value of 43.44), followed by White residents (41.45), Native American residents (38.99), and Hispanic residents (37.35). Black residents are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools, with an index value of 36.35. In general, index values for all residents are relatively low, indicating access to high-performing schools is a problem for the entire jurisdiction. For the population living below the poverty line, access to high-performing schools is even more limited. Except for Native American residents living below the poverty line, who have the highest index value of any group, all other race/ethnic groups living below the poverty line have less access to high-performing schools. Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the least access, with index values of 29.28 and 29.56, respectively.
Victorville:
In Victorville, there are small disparities in access to high-performing schools by race/ethnicity.
White, Non-Hispanic residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools (with an index value of 20.95), followed by Asian/Pacific Islander residents (20.07), Hispanic residents (19.4), Black residents (19.33), and Native American residents (16.47), who have the least access. The population below the poverty line has similar levels of access to high- performing schools, though Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the best access of any group (23.63).
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
2 The 2010 version of Map 2 does not show any R/ECAPs in Apple Valley. The discrepancy between R/ECAPs shown on Map 2 and Map 1 is due to the fact that HUD uses different sources of data for these maps. More information about the data used for these maps can be found online at https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/FHEO/documents/AFFH-T-Data-Documentation-AFFHT0006-July-2020.pdf
29 In the region, there are much wider disparities in the school proficiency index across racial/ethnic groups and for the population below the poverty line. Black and Hispanic residents below the poverty line have the lowest index values (25.68 and 26.74, respectively), meaning they are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools. White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents above the poverty line have the highest index values (46.63 and
51.51, respectively) meaning they are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools.
Compared to the region, Apple Valley’s White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents have slightly worse access to high-performing schools, while Apple Valley’s Black, Hispanic, and Native American residents have slightly better access. This also means that there is slightly less disparity in access based on race/ethnicity in Apple Valley, as compared to the region
In Victorville, in comparison both Apple Valley and the region, residents have less access to high-performing schools: However, in Victorville, there are fewer disparities by race/ethnicity as compared to the region and Apple Valley.
30 Describe the relationship between the residency patterns of racial/ethnic, national origin, and family status groups and their proximity to proficient schools.
Map 7 – Demographics and School Proficiency is a series of three maps showing the School Proficiency Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type.
The maps are shaded according to school proximity index values. The darker shaded areas are those with higher index values, indicating the presence of higher performing schools in those areas.
Apple Valley:
There are differences in school performance based on geography, with neighborhoods in the southwest of the jurisdiction having the highest performing schools, and the more central neighborhoods having the least access to high-performing schools.
The first map shows that residents of different racial/ethnic groups, represented by different colored dots, seem to be evenly distributed across Apple Valley, with no visible concentrations in areas with better or worse access to high-performing schools. The second map shows that the areas with least access to high-performing schools, which are in the center of the jurisdiction, are home to residents originally from Mexico. The other national origin groups reside in areas with better access to high-performing schools. This indicates that residents born in Mexico may have less access to high-performing schools than other groups.
The third map shows where families with children live in relation to areas with high-performing schools. The size of the circles on the map indicates the percentage of families in the area that have children living with them. The map shows that the areas with the least access to high- performing schools (in the R/ECAP in the center of the jurisdiction) also have the highest proportion of families with children (shown by the relatively large circles).
Victorville:
In Victorville, there are also differences in school performance based on geography. Census tracts in the southeast have darker shading than the rest of the city, indicating higher performing schools.
The first two maps show that residents of different racial/ethnic groups and different national origins, represented by different colored dots, do not seem to be concentrated in areas with better or worse access to high-performing schools. Similarly, the third map shows that larger circles, indicating higher proportions of families with children, do not seem to be clustered in areas with either higher or lower performing schools. All this indicates that Victorville residents of different races/ethnicities, national origins, and family types have similar levels of access to high- performing schools.
31 32
Describe how school-related policies, such as school enrollment policies, affect a student’s ability to attend a proficient school. Which protected class groups are least successful in accessing proficient schools? Both Apple Valley and Victorville school districts strive to create and promote proficient schools across their districts. The school districts
From the above analysis, it appears that, in Apple Valley, Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line, as well as residents born in Mexico and families with children are more likely than other residents to live in areas with lower-performing schools, indicating that these protected class groups are least successful in accessing proficient schools. In Victorville, compared to Apple Valley and the region, all residents, regardless of race/ethnicity, national origin, or family type, have relatively low access to high-performing schools.
Employment Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to jobs and labor markets by protected class groups.
Jobs Proximity
33 Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Jobs Proximity Index, which measures the physical distance between where Apple Valley and Victorville residents of different races/ethnicities live and the location of jobs. A higher index value indicates better access to employment opportunities.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, access to employment opportunities is relatively low for all groups, and those living below the poverty line have less access to employment centers. There is some disparity in access to employment centers by race/ethnicity, with Asian/Pacific most likely to live near employment centers (index value of 26.91) and Hispanic residents least likely to live near employment centers (index value of 19.57).
Victorville:
In Victorville, access to employment opportunities varies slightly by race/ethnicity. Native American residents have the best access to employment centers (with an index value of 50.68) and Asian/Pacific Islanders have the least access (index value of 34.16). For all race/ethnic groups except Native Americans, populations living below the poverty line has better access to employment centers.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
In both Victorville and the region, residents of all races/ethnicities, including those living below the poverty line (except for Native Americans living below the poverty line in Victorville), have better access to employment centers than residents of Apple Valley. In the region, there are also disparities in access to employment centers based on race/ethnicity. Black residents living below the poverty line have the least access to employment centers (with an index value of 41.83) and Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the greatest access (with an index value of 57.38).
Labor Market
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity also includes a Labor Market Index, which measures the unemployment rate, labor-force participation rate, and percent of the population ages 25 and above with at least a bachelor’s degree, by neighborhood. A higher index value indicates that residents live in a neighborhood with higher labor force participation and human capital.
Apple Valley:
Table 8 shows that Apple Valley residents generally live in neighborhoods with low labor force participation and human capital, as indicated by the relatively low index values for all race/ethnic groups. Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital: they have index values of just 8.26 and 8.66, respectively. Asian/Pacific Islander residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital: they have an index value of 19.83, which is still relatively low.
Victorville:
34 Table 8 shows that Victorville residents generally live in neighborhoods with low labor force participation and human capital, as indicated by the relatively low index values for all race/ethnic groups. Asian/Pacific Islander residents are most likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital (with an index value of 14.63) and Native American residents are least likely to (index value of 8.94). Except for Native Americans, populations living below the poverty line are even less likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
The population of Victorville, in comparison to Apple Valley and the region, has relatively low access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital. Apple Valley residents lag the region’s residents on this index: overall the region’s residents have better access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital than both Victorville and Apple Valley. In the region, there are significant disparities in access based on race/ethnicity.
Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the least access of any group to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital (with index values of
16.85) and Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the most access (with an index value of 57.38).
How does a person’s place of residence affect their ability to obtain a job?
Map 8 – Demographics and Job Proximity is a series of three maps showing the Jobs Proximity Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are closer to areas of employment.
Apple Valley:
The maps show the northern part of Apple Valley has better proximity to jobs centers, meaning residents that live in those areas are closer to employment opportunities. Because Apple Valley is well integrated by race/ethnicity, there does not appear to be any major difference in proximity to job opportunities by race/ethnicity on the first map. However, on the second and third maps show, in the areas with the best access to employment centers there are relatively few residents of Mexican origin and families with children.
Victorville:
The maps show Census tracts in the southeast and northwest of Victorville have some of the highest jobs proximity index values, meaning residents that live in those areas are closer to employment opportunities. Because Victorville is relatively well integrated by race/ethnicity, there does not appear to be any major difference in proximity to job opportunities by race/ethnicity on the first map. Similarly, the second and third maps show that residents of different national origins and families with children are also fairly well distributed across the areas with better access to jobs.
35 36
Map 9 – Demographics and Labor Market is a series of three maps showing the Labor Market Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they have higher labor force participation and human capital.
Apple Valley:
The maps show that the northern part of Apple Valley and a Census tract on the western edge have the highest levels of labor force participation and human capital, relative to other parts of the jurisdiction. Similar to Map 8, there does not appear to be any concentration of specific race/ethnic groups in areas with higher or lower index values, however there are relatively few residents of Mexican origin and families with children in the areas with the highest levels of labor force participation and human capital.
Victorville:
The maps show that all parts of Victorville have relatively low labor market index values—there is no dark shading on the map. Certain areas of the city do have slightly higher index values, including the sparsely populated northernmost Census tract, and two Census tracts in the southwest. Similar to Map 8, there do not appear to be any concentrations of protected class groups in specific areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation and human capital.
37 38
Which racial/ethnic, national origin, or family status groups are least successful in accessing employment?
Table 9 – Labor Force Participation and Unemployment, below, shows 2013-2017 American Community Survey data on labor force participation rates and unemployment rates for the overall population and by race/ethnicity, disability status, and sex, in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. The graph below, titled COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Unemployment Rate, shows the monthly unemployment rate for Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region in 2020 and 2021, demonstrating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on employment.
Apple Valley:
According to Table 9, in Apple Valley, Hispanic residents have the highest labor force participation rate (60.8%) and Black residents have the lowest (39.3%). There are also wide disparities in the unemployment rate. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest unemployment rate (8.17%), while Hispanic and Native American residents have significantly higher unemployment rates (15.2% and 19.9%, respectively). Persons living with a disability are less likely to participate in the labor force and are more likely to be unemployed than the population as a whole. Finally, women in Apple Valley are more likely to be unemployed than men.
According to Table 8, Black and Hispanic residents in Apple Valley who are living below the poverty line are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high labor force participation and
39 human capital. Additionally, Map 8 and Map 9 show that Apple Valley residents born in Mexico and families with children are less likely to live in areas with good access to job centers, high labor force participation, and high levels of human capital.
Victorville:
According to Table 9, in Victorville, Native Americans have the lowest labor force participation rate (31.7%) and the highest unemployment rate of any group (25.8%). Among other race/ethnic groups, labor force participation is nearly the same, however there are large disparities in the unemployment rates. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest unemployment rate (7.41%), followed by White residents (11.4%), Hispanic residents (15.3%), and Black residents (15.9%). Persons living with a disability are less likely to participate in the labor force and are more likely to be unemployed than the population as a whole.
According to Table 8, Native Americans have the lowest Labor Market Index value of any group, and Native Americans below the poverty line have the lowest Jobs Proximity Index value of any group. This indicates that Native Americans, and particularly those living below the poverty line, may be least successful in accessing employment in Victorville.
As shown in the graph below, during the economic shutdown initiated in response to COVID-19, unemployment in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region increased dramatically. Victorville, in comparison to Apple Valley and the region, started off with a higher unemployment rate, reached a higher peak level of unemployment (17% in April 2020), and has maintained a higher unemployment level since then. While the unemployment rate in the region reached a higher level in April 2020 than the unemployment rate in Apple Valley (peaking at 15.2% in the region compared to 13.4% in Apple Valley), employment in the region has recovered at a faster rate than in Apple Valley. Since October 2020 the region has maintained a lower unemployment rate than Apple Valley.
40 It is very likely the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated racial/ethnic and gender-based unemployment disparities in Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. While data at a local level is not yet available, national trends show wide disparities in job losses by race/ethnicity and sex.
According to the Congressional Research Service,3 across the U.S., women at every age group experienced higher increases in unemployment during the pandemic than men. The same was true for Black and Hispanic workers in comparison to White and Asian workers. The charts below show the disparities in peak unemployment rates during the pandemic by age/sex, race, and ethnicity.
3 Falk, G., Romero, P., Nicchitta, I., & Nyhof, E. (2021, August 20). Unemployment Rates During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved December 4, 2021 , from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R46554
41 42
Transportation Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to transportation based on place of residence, cost, or other transportation related factors.
Access to Public Transit
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Transit Index, which measures the likelihood that residents utilize public transportation. Higher index values indicate better access to public transit in a neighborhood. Map 10 – Demographics and Transit Trips is a series of three maps showing the Transit Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with better access to public transit.
Apple Valley:
As Table 8 shows, Apple Valley residents of different races/ethnicities have comparable access to public transit. Index values range from a low of 30.24 for Asian/Pacific Islanders to a high of
36.48 for Black residents. For the population below the poverty line, access to public transit is generally better, with higher index values for all groups except for Native Americans living below the poverty line, who have the lowest index value in the jurisdiction: 18.01.
As Map 10 shows, residents in the R/ECAP Census tract in the center of the jurisdiction have the best access to public transit in Apple Valley. As described previously, Apple Valley residents experience a relatively high level of residential integration across races/ethnicities, therefore Map 10 shows that there is no significant concentration of specific racial/ethnic groups in neighborhoods with greater or lesser access to public transit. However, of all national origin groups, only residents of Mexican origin live in the R/ECAP area, indicating they have better access to public transit than other national origin groups. Similarly, the R/ECAP area has a high concentration of families with children (shown by the relatively large dots on the third map), indicating those families with children have relatively good access to transit.
43 Victorville:
As Table 8 shows, Victorville residents of different races/ethnicities have comparable access to public transit. Index values range from a low of 27.12 for Asian/Pacific Islanders to a high of
29.92 for Black residents. For the population below the poverty line, access to public transit is generally better, with higher index values for all groups except for Black residents living below the poverty line.
As Map 10 shows, Census tracts in the center of the city and in the north have the best access to public transit in Victorville (shown by the darker shading). As the first map shows, residents of different races/ethnicities are evenly distributed across the city, therefore there are no visible disparities in access to public transit by race/ethnicity. On the second map, however, which shows the distribution of residents of various national origins, there appear to be relatively few residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, or Korean origin, compared to those of Mexican origin, in the Census tracts with the most access to public transit. This indicates that Victorville residents born in these Asian countries may be less able to access public transit than other groups. Finally, the third map, which shows the distribution of families with children, does not appear to show any concentration of families with children in areas with high or low access to public transit.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Residents in Apple Valley generally have better access to public transit compared to their counterparts in Victorville. In the region, all racial/ethnic groups have better access to public transit compared to both Apple Valley and Victorville. In the region, Native Americans have the least access, with an index value of 47.70, and Asian/Pacific Islanders have the greatest access, with in index value of 55.92. Access to public transit is generally even higher for the population living below the poverty line, with Asian/Pacific Islanders living below the poverty having the highest index value (58.72).
44 45
Transportation Costs
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity also includes a Low Transportation Cost Index, which measures the cost of transportation in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate lower transportation costs. Transportation costs may be low in a neighborhood due to better access to public transportation, or to the density of housing, services, and employment, or to other reasons. Map 11 – Demographics and Low Transportation Cost is a series of three maps showing the Low Transportation Cost Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with lower transportation costs.
Apple Valley:
As Table 8 shows, transportation costs are comparable for all racial/ethnic groups in Apple Valley. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the highest costs, with an index value of 38, and Black residents have the lowest costs, with an index value of 40. For residents living below the poverty line, transportation costs are generally lower, with higher index values for all groups except Native Americans, who have the lowest index value in the jurisdiction: 34.19.
Map 11 shows that residents in the R/ECAP Census tract in the center of the jurisdiction have lower transportation costs than residents in other areas. The even distribution of colored dots on the first map indicates that there is no concentration of specific racial/ethnic groups in neighborhoods with higher or lower transportation costs. The second map shows that, of the various national origin groups in Apple Valley, only residents born in Mexico live in the
46 R/ECAP area. The third map shows that there is a high concentration of families with children in the R/ECAP (shown by the relatively large dot sizes in that area). These maps indicate that residents born in Mexico and families with children benefit from living in an area with lower transportation costs.
Victorville:
As Table 8 shows, transportation costs are comparable for all racial/ethnic groups in Victorville.
Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the highest costs, with an index value of 35.92, and Native American residents have the lowest costs, with an index value of 39.06. For residents living below the poverty line, transportation costs are generally lower, with higher index values for all groups except Native Americans, who have the lowest index value in the jurisdiction: 29.21.
Map 11 shows that residents living in the Census tracts in the center of the city—the area with the darkest shading—have the lowest transportation costs. Similar to Map 10, there does not appear to be a concentration of particular race/ethnic groups, or families with children, in areas with higher or lower transportation costs. However, the Census tracts shaded the darkest do appear to be areas with relatively few residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin, indicating those groups may face higher transportation costs relative to others.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Residents in Apple Valley and Victorville have very similar levels of access to neighborhoods with low transportation costs. In the region, index values are slightly higher for all groups compared to Apple Valley and Victorville, indicating lower transportation costs overall for residents in the region. There are no large disparities by race/ethnicity. The lowest index value is
42.13 (for White, Non-Hispanic residents) and the highest index value is 46.31 (for Hispanic residents). For the population below the poverty line, index values are higher for all racial/ethnic groups. Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the highest index value (49.70) and White, Non-Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the lowest index value (45.70).
47 48
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most affected by the lack of a reliable, affordable transportation connection between their place of residence and opportunities?
In general, different race/ethnic groups in Apple Valley have similar levels of access to public transportation and experience similar transportation costs. The exception is Native Americans living below the poverty line, who experience the least access to public transit and the highest transportation costs of any group. Residents of Mexican origin and families with children who live in the R/ECAP area in the center of the jurisdiction appear to have relatively good access to public transit and relatively low transportation costs.
Similarly, in Victorville, different race/ethnic groups have broadly similar levels of access to public transportation and experience similar transportation costs. However, Asian/Pacific Islander residents have slightly less access to public transit and face slightly higher transportation costs. This disparity may be related to the fact that, as shown on Map 10 and Map 11, a larger number of residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin live outside the areas with the best access to public transit and the lowest costs, than live inside those areas.
Describe how the jurisdictions’ and region’s policies, such as public transportation routes or transportation systems designed for use personal vehicles, affect the ability of protected class groups to access transportation.
49 The Victor Valley Transit Authority (VVTA) establishes and maintains bus routes throughout the high desert communities. VVTA maintains routes that serve all communities within the region and evaluates its routes to ensure they are the most effective routes to serve the high desert communities. VVTA complements its regular bus route with programs such as its van pool program to offer subsidies to van pools for commuters traveling together.
Low Poverty Exposure Opportunities
Describe any disparities in exposure to poverty by protected class groups.
Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Low Poverty Index, which measures the level of poverty in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate less exposure to poverty in a neighborhood.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, all residents have relatively high exposure to poverty. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest exposure to poverty (with an index value of 42.92), followed by White residents (39.3). Hispanic and Black residents have the highest exposure to poverty, with index values of 31.95 and 32.29, respectively. Residents living below the poverty line generally have higher exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. The exception is Native American residents living below the poverty line, who are slightly less likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods than the overall Native American population in Apple Valley.
Victorville:
In Victorville, all residents have relatively high exposure to poverty. Asian/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest exposure to poverty (with an index value of 24.31), followed by White residents (23.43). Hispanic, Black, and Native American residents have the highest exposure to poverty, with index values of 21.57, 21.16, and 20.78, respectively. Residents living below the poverty line generally have higher exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. In fact, Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the highest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 15.92. The exception is Native American residents living below the poverty line, who are the least likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods of any group.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Victorville residents are more likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods than Apple Valley residents. Disparities in which race/ethnic groups are more likely to be exposed to poverty are similar in both places. Regionwide, residents are generally less likely to live in neighborhoods where they are exposed to poverty than either Apple Valley or Victorville, however the disparities in index values by race/ethnicity are larger. In the region, Hispanic residents have the highest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 36.39. Asia/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 58.83. The population living below the poverty line in the region is even more likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods, with index values significantly lower than the overall population.
50 Index values for the population below the poverty line range from 24.29 for Hispanic residents to
41.94 for Asian/Pacific Islander residents.
What role does a person’s place of residence play in their exposure to poverty?
Map 12 – Demographics and Poverty is a series of three maps showing the Low Poverty Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with less exposure to poverty.
Apple Valley:
Map 12 shows that residents in neighborhoods in the northern and southeastern parts of Apple Valley have less exposure to poverty, and residents in the R/ECAP area in the center of the jurisdiction have the highest exposure to poverty. While racial/ethnic groups seem to be relatively evenly distributed across areas with both higher and lower exposure to poverty, the second and third maps show that there are relatively few residents of Mexican origin or families with children in the darkest shaded areas in the north compared to the R/ECAP area. This indicates that Mexican-born residents and families with children are more likely than other groups to be exposed to poverty in the neighborhoods where they live.
Victorville:
In Victorville, Map 12 shows that residents in the Census tracts in the central and eastern part of the city (including the two R/ECAPs) and in the R/ECAP in the northwest, are the most likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods. Given the even distribution of race/ethnic groups and families with children across the jurisdiction, there is no apparent concentration of specific race/ethnic groups or of families with children in those areas with more or less exposure to poverty. The second map in the series, which shows where residents of different national origins live, does show that there are relatively few residents of Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, or Korean origin in those Census tracts with the highest exposure to poverty, compared to other parts of the city. This indicates that those populations are less likely to be exposed to poverty than other national origin groups.
51 52
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most affected by these poverty indicators?
Table 10 – Poverty by Race/Ethnicity and National Origin, below, shows data from the 2013- 2017 American Community Survey on poverty rates by race/ethnicity and national origin.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, according to the above analysis, Black and Hispanic residents are more likely to live in neighborhoods with relatively high exposure to poverty, as are residents of Mexican origin and families with children. According to Table 10, Native American residents have the highest poverty rate (31.49%), followed by Hispanic residents (24.2%), Black residents (24.07%), White residents (13.86%), and Asian/Pacific Islander residents, who have the lowest poverty rate (6.31%). Foreign-born residents of Apple Valley are less likely than native-born resident to live below the poverty line, with a poverty rate of 14.53% compared to 18.49% for native-born residents.
Victorville:
In Victorville, the above analysis indicates that all residents have a relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, the analysis also indicates that Asian/Pacific Islander residents have a slightly lower risk of exposure to poverty. According to Table 10, Black residents have the highest poverty rate (32.56%), followed by Native American residents (29.58%), Hispanic residents (25.42%), Asian/Pacific Islander residents (14.43%), and White
53 residents, who have the lowest poverty rate (14.3%). Foreign-born residents of Victorville are slightly more likely than native-born resident to live below the poverty line.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Apple Valley has a slightly higher poverty rate overall (18.12%) than the region (16.82%), and Victorville has a highest rate (23.26%) of all three. In the region, there are similar disparities in poverty to Apple Valley and Victorville, with Native American, Black, and Hispanic residents more likely to live below the poverty line than Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents. In the region, like in Victorville, foreign-born residents are more likely to live below the poverty line than native-born residents.
Describe how the jurisdictions’ and region’s policies affect the ability of protected class groups to access low poverty areas.
Apple Valley:
The Town of Apple Valley relies upon the availability of Housing Choice Vouchers provided through the Housing Authority. Unfortunately, the waitlist for Apple Valley is rarely open. Further, federal funding for other housing programs is limited compared to private, market pressures on housing in the Town.
Victorville:
Access to lower poverty areas is limited to residents in Victorville because of the limited opportunities in labor, transportation and education. Further, housing has become less affordable over the past ten years – putting greater poverty pressure on hous eholds throughout the City.
Victorville is limited in providing access to low poverty areas via limited Housing Choice Vouchers and limited other funding for affordable housing and tenant based rental assistance programs.
Environmentally Healthy Neighborhood Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods by protected class groups.
54 Table 8 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes an Environmental Health Index, which captures the potential exposure to harmful toxins in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate less exposure to harmful toxins, and therefore better environmental quality, in a neighborhood. Map 13 – Demographics and Environmental Health is a series of three maps showing the Environmental Health Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with less exposure to harmful toxins and therefore higher environmental quality.
Apple Valley:
As Table 8 shows, Apple Valley residents of all racial/ethnic groups, including those living below the poverty line, have relatively high access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods.
Index values for all groups in Apple Valley are in the mid-70s.
As Map 13 shows, areas in southeast Apple Valley have the highest index values, while areas in the north and northwest of the jurisdiction have the lowest index values (meaning residents in the north/northwest have less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods than those in the southeast). The maps also show that residents of different race/ethnic groups and national origins, and families with children, are evenly dispersed throughout the areas with better and worse access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, meaning there are no apparent disparities based on those protected classes.
Victorville:
As Table 8 shows, Victorville residents of all racial/ethnic groups have relatively high access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. Index values for all groups in Victorville are in the high 60s. The population below the poverty line generally has slightly less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods than the population as a whole: index values are in the mid 60s.
Map 13 shows that there is relatively uniform access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods across Victorville—most of the city has the same shading. The exceptions are one Census tract in the northwest, which has the high index value (i.e., is more environmentally healthy relative to other tracts), and two Census tracts in the center of the city—including one of the R/ECAPs— that have lower index values than other areas, meaning residents in those areas have less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. The maps do not show any concentration of race/ethnic groups, national origin groups, or families with children in the areas with better or worse access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Residents of all races/ethnicities in both Apple Valley and Victorville experience relatively high access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, though Apple Valley residents have slightly better access than their counterparts in Victorville. In comparison, the population in the region has much less access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, and access varies significantly by race/ethnicity. Asian/Pacific Islander residents of the region have the least access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, with an index value of 35.12. Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line are slightly worse off, with an index value of 34.87, the lowest of any population group in the region. Native American and White residents in the region
55 have the most access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods of any group, with index values of 49.9 and 48.02, respectively, though they still have less access than residents of Apple Valley and Victorville.
56 57
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups have the least access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods?
The Environmental Health Index in Table 8 and Map 13 – Demographics and Environmental Health show that there is no significant disparity in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods by race/ethnicity, national origin, or family status.
Patterns in Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Identify and discuss any overarching patterns of access to opportunity and exposure to adverse community factors based on race/ethnicity, national origin, or familial status. Identify areas that experience an aggregate of poor access to opportunity and high exposure to adverse factors. Include how these patterns compare to patterns of segregation and R/ECAPs.
Apple Valley:
According to the above analysis, Apple Valley residents in general have relatively low access to high performing schools and employment opportunities, and relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, the analysis indicates that Black and Hispanic residents (especially those living below the poverty line), residents of Mexican origin, and families with children, are least likely to live in neighborhoods with high performing schools, high labor force participation, and high levels of human capital. These groups are also more likely to live in neighborhoods where they are exposed to poverty.
These same challenges are all present in Census tract 0097.16, which is the R/ECAP tract located in the center of the jurisdiction. This part of the jurisdiction has relatively low performing schools, low levels of labor force participation and human capital, and high levels of poverty.
The analysis shows that Black residents, families with children, and residents born in Mexico disproportionately reside in this R/ECAP.
Victorville:
According to the above analysis, all Victorville residents, regardless of protected class status, have relatively low access to high-performing schools, relatively low access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital, and relatively high exposure to poverty in their neighborhoods. However, there is evidence that different protected class groups face specific challenges regarding access to opportunities and exposure to adverse community factors.
For example:
• Native Americans, particularly those living below the poverty line, appear to be least successful in accessing employment in Victorville. According to ACS data, Native Americans have the lowest labor force participation rate and the highest unemployment rate of any group.
• Asian/Pacific Islander residents have slightly less access to public transit and face slightly higher transportation costs, which may be related to the fact that more residents of
58 Filipino, Indian, Vietnamese, and Korean origin live outside the areas with the best access to public transit and the lowest costs, than live inside those areas. • Hispanic residents, residents born in Mexico, and families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs.
Disproportionate Housing Needs
Analysis
Which groups experience higher rates of housing cost burden, overcrowding, or substandard housing when compared to other groups? Which groups also experience higher rates of severe housing burdens when compared to other groups?
For the 2022 Consolidated Plan (ConPlan), the Apple Valley-Victorville HOME Consortium analyzed 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data to determine if racial/ethnic groups at various income levels disproportionately experience any of the following four housing problems:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator.
• Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower.
• Overcrowding: A household is considered overcrowded if there are more than 1.01 people per room.
• Cost burden: A household is considered cost burdened if the household pays more than 30 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
According to the analysis in the ConPlan, at least one racial/ethnic group is disproportionately impacted by one or more of four housing problems in all income levels. Disproportionate impact means that a particular group is more likely to experience housing problems when compared to the population as a whole. As the chart below shows, among households in Apple Valley and Victorville that earn up to the area median income (0-100% of AMI), Black, Pacific Islander, and Hispanic households are more likely than other households to experience at least one of the four housing problems listed above. Eighty-three percent (83%) of Black households, 100% of Pacific Islander households, and 77% of Hispanic households experience at least one housing problem.
In comparison, 63% of White households and 69% of Asian households experience at least one housing problem.
59 Sources: 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, American Community Survey 2013- 2017 5- Year Estimates
The 2022 ConPlan also analyzes the disproportionate impact of severe housing problems by race/ethnicity. Similar to housing problems, severe housing problems are defined as:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household does not have a stove/oven and refrigerator. • Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household does not have running water or modern toilets.
• Severe overcrowding: A household is considered severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room.
• Severe cost burden: A household is considered severely cost burdened if the household pays more than 50 percent of its total income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
The chart below shows that, among Apple Valley and Victorville households that earn up to the area median income (0-100% of AMI), Hispanic households are more likely than others to experience at least one of the four severe housing problems listed above. Forty-six percent (46%) of Hispanic households experience at least one severe housing problem. In comparison, 31% of White households, 25% of Black households, 34% of Asian households, and 0% of Pacific Islander households experience at least one severe housing problem.
60 Sources: 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, American Community Survey 2013- 2017 5- Year Estimates
Which areas in the jurisdiction and region experience the greatest housing burdens? Which of these areas align with segregated areas, integrated areas, or R/ECAPs and what are the predominant race/ethnicity or national origin groups in such areas?
Map 6 – Housing Problems is a series of maps showing concentrations of households experiencing one or more housing burdens and population distribution by race/ethnicity and national origin, for Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region. On these maps, areas with darker shading have a higher percentage of households experiencing at least one housing burden.
Housing burdens in this context are the following: cost burden, defined as paying more than 30% of income for monthly housing costs including utilities; overcrowding; lacking a complete kitchen; and lacking plumbing.
Apple Valley:
The maps show that the northern and southeastern parts of Apple Valley have higher concentrations of families experiencing one or more of these housing burdens, compared to other neighborhoods. Census tract 0097.10, in the southeast, has the highest concentration of households with housing burdens. In that area, 56.48% of households have at least one of the four housing burdens.
These maps also show there is no apparent concentration of specific racial/ethnic or national origin groups in the areas with high or low concentrations of housing burdens.
Victorville:
Map 6 shows that the southeastern part of Victorville has a higher concentration of families experiencing housing burdens than most other areas of the city. In these areas, which include two R/ECAPs, over 50% of families experience at least one housing burden. Census tract 0091.16, portions of which are in northwest Victorville, over 60% of families experience at least one housing burden. This Census tract is classified as a R/ECAP. The maps do not show any
61 concentrations of specific race/ethnic or national origin groups in the areas with more housing burdens.
Region:
In the region, there are high concentrations of families experiencing one or more of these housing burdens to the near west of Apple Valley/Victorville, as well as farther to the northwest and south. Based on the scale of these maps, it is difficult to determine whether there are specific racial/ethnic or national origin groups concentrated in the areas with more housing burdens.
62 63
64 Describe the differences in rates of renter and owner-occupied housing by race/ethnicity in the jurisdiction and region.
Table 11 – Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity, below, shows the percentages of households that are renters and homeowners by race/ethnicity, for Apple Valley, Victorville, and the region.
Apple Valley:
In Apple Valley, 65% of all households own their home, however there are significant disparities by race/ethnicity. The homeownership rate for Asian/Pacific Islander residents in Apple Valley is highest, at 80%. White households have a comparable homeownership rate of 71%. However, only 54% of Native Americans and Hispanic households own their home. For Black households, the homeownership rate is even lower, at 49%.
Victorville:
In Victorville, 54% of all households own their home and there are significant disparities by race/ethnicity. The homeownership rate for Asian/Pacific Islander residents in Apple Valley is highest, at 73%. White, Non-Hispanic households have the second highest homeownership rate, at 62%. Hispanic and Native American households have significantly lower homeownership rates, of 55% and 58%, respectively. Black households have the lowest rate of homeownership in the city: only 29% of Black households own their home.
Comparison Across Jurisdictions and to the Region:
Victorville residents in general are less likely to own their own home than residents of Apple Valley. Similar disparities by race/ethnicity are present in both jurisdictions. Black households are least likely to own their home, and Asian/Pacific Islander households, followed by White, Non-Hispanic households, are most likely to be homeowners.
In the region, the overall homeownership rate (62%) is slightly lower than Apple Valley’s but higher than Victorville’s. Disparities by race/ethnicity are also present in the region and align with the disparities present in Apple Valley and Victorville. Homeownership rates for White and Asian/Pacific Islander households are highest in the region (71% and 70%, respectively.
Homeownership rates for Black households in the region are the lowest, at 42%, which is still significantly higher than the Black homeownership rate in Victorville. The homeownership rate for Native Americans households is 52% and for Hispanic households it is 56%.
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT B
Citizen Participation Plan
CITY OF VICTORVILLE - CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
Amended: May 5, 2020 (Amendments Underlined)
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Since 1997, the City of Victorville (the “City”) has received an annual allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In 2003, the City formed a HOME Investment Partnership Program Consortium with the Town of Apple Valley (the “HOME Consortium”) in order to meet the threshold of obtaining HOME entitlement status with HUD. The City receives both CDBG and HOME funding annually.
As an Entitlement City, the City is required to prepare and adopt a Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) and an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). The Con Plan is a plan of three to five years in length, which reviews and considers the housing and community development needs of the City, establishes priorities for CDBG and HOME funds, creates and institutes an Annual Action Plan (AP) for meeting current and future needs, and identifies the City’s performance in meeting its annual goals through the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER).
The AFH replaces the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (AI) to assist the City in identifying fair housing issues and related contributing factors to achieve comprehensive community development goals and affirmatively further fair housing. The Con Plan, A P Plan and AFH are also required to have a strategy for resident and citizen participation in the planning process. According to 24 CFR § 91.105 and as a condition of federal funding , the City must adopt and follow a Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) describing how the City will encourage participation from residents and citizens of all ages, genders, economic levels, races, ethnicities and special needs to provide them with equal access in the development of the Con Plan, A P and AFH, and to ensure their issues and concerns are adequately addressed. Participation shall include community-based and regionally-based organizations that represent and assist protected class members and organizations that enforce fair housing laws.
II. PURPOSE OF THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
The purpose of the CPP is to provide the method and process by which the City’s Con Plan, AP and AFH processes will comply with the citizen participation requirements set forth by HUD pursuant to 24 CFR §
91.105 and the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Final Rule (24 CFR §§ 5.150 through 5.180). This CPP states the process of soliciting the views and recommendations from the public, as well as the process for incorporating public comments and views into the objectives and outcomes developed in the Con Plan, AP, and AFH. This CPP and the participation process shall be implemented and monitored by the City’s Development Department.
III. DEVELOPMENT OF AFH, CON PLAN, AP, AND CAPER; SUBSEQUENT
REVISIONS AND SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENTS
Introductory Note. The citizen participation processes and procedures associated with each of the planning documents/reports discussed in this Section are detailed in Section V of this CPP and further described in tabular format on page 5 (the “Summary Table”).
2 Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). The AFH is required every five years prior to the preparation of the Con Plan. When preparing an AFH , the City will make HUD -provided data and other supplemental information available to interested citizens, residents, agencies and organizations in an effort to provide meaningful analyses of local fair housing conditions and issues. The City shall publish a notice announcing the availability of this data /information and requesting the views of the residents at a public hearing at least ten (10) days prior to the date of such hearing. In addition, prior to the City adopting and submitting the final AFH to HUD, at least one thirty (30) day public comment period will be provided (after publication of notice and the draft AFH) and a second public hearing will be noticed and held to obtain further citizen input. The City may choose to conduct this hearing in conjunction with one of the two required public hearings on the Con Plan.
AFH Revisions. Pursuant to 24 CFR §5.164, t he City shall consider an AFH previously accepted by HUD to require modification (“Revisions”) and re-submission to HUD in the following instances:
When the City’s circumstances change in a way that affects the information on which the AFH is based, to the extent that the analysis, the fair housing contributing factors, or the priorities and goals of the AFH are no longer applicable or reflect actual circumstances. Examples of changed circumstances include:
o Presidentially declared disasters affecting the City that significantly impact the steps the City may need to take to affirmatively further fair housing; o Significant changes in the City’s demographic;
o The occurrence of new significant contributing factors in the City’s jurisdiction o civil rights findings, determinations, settlements (including Voluntary Compliance Agreements) or court orders
Upon HUD’s written notification specifying a material change that requires the Revisions Revisions may not necessarily require the submission of an entirely new AFH. Revisions need only focus on the material change and appropriate adjustments to the analy ses, assessments, priorities, or goals.
AFH Revisions will be published and noticed for public comment and hearing (see Summary Table).
Consolidated Plan (C on Plan); Annual Action Plan (AP) . The Con Plan examines housing and community development needs, sets priorities for grant monies and establishes a strategic plan with specific measurable goals to address priority needs. Prior to adopting the Con Plan or AP, the City will make available to citizens, public agencies, and other interested parties:
The amount of assistance the City expects to receive; The range of activities that may be undertaken with such funds; The amount of funds proposed to be used for activities and the estimated benefit to low and moderate income persons; and
The City’s plans to minimize displacement of persons and what type of assistance will be made available to those persons displaced.
At least one (1) public hearing will be noticed and held during the development of the Con Plan and AP to receive public comment and incorporate citizen participation . In addition, a second public hearing regarding the contents of the Con Plan / AP will be noticed and conducted prior to the City’s adoption of these documents and submission to HUD. Notices of such public hearings will be published at least ten (10) days in advance or as specified in the Summary Table. At least thirty (30) days prior to adoption, copies of the proposed Con Plan, AP, and any Substantial Amendments (defined below) will be published by the City (made available for publ ic review) and a thirty (30) day public comment period will be noticed and provided. The City Manager or their designee may allow adjustments to public noticing, public hearing, and publishing requirements in conjunction with applicable waivers provided by HUD.
3 CAPER. At least fifteen (15) days prior to submission to HUD, copies of the CAPER will published and a like period of public comment will be noticed and provided.
Substantial Amendments . The occurrence of any of the following circumstances shal l require a modification of the Con Plan or AP (“Substantial Amendment”), which shall be noticed, heard, published for comment and adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section V of this CPP, as applicable:
A significant shift is proposed in allocation priorities, or a substantial change in the method of distributing funds;
An activity not included in the AP is proposed for funding; To use funds, including program income, not previously described in the Annual Action Plan; An activity included in the AP is proposed for elimination; The amount allocated to any activity is proposed to be increased or decreased from the amount described in the AP by more than 25%; or
Change in the location of the activity, target area, beneficiaries, eligibility c riteria, or general scope from that described in the AP.
IV. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS – OPPORTUNITIES AND PARTICIPATION Citizen Participation. Citizens and residents should be afforded the maximum feasible opportunity to :
provide input on housing and community development needs; address issues/problems affecting low- and moderate- income persons; learn about various programs available and the expected amount of assistance provided/allowed by each opportunity; develop local project proposals; give input to project selections and funding distributions; and participate in the implementation of funded activities. The procedures in this Section are designed to encourage persons of low and moderate income, particularly those per sons residing in slum and blighted and other City- targeted revitalization areas ; minorities; non-English speaking persons ; persons with disabilities ; persons with HIV/AIDS and their families ; and homeless persons to participate in the planning, implementat ion and assessment of the documents and reports described in this CPP . The City Manager or their designee may allow adjustments to the Public Participation process in conjunction with applicable waivers provided by HUD.
Organizational Participation. In developing and implementing the Con Plan and AFH, the City shall encourage participation of local and regional institutions and government agencies; public housing authorities, adjoining cities; Continuums of Care; and other organizations (including businesses, developers, nonprofit organizations, philanthropic organizations, and community- based and faith- based organizations). In conjunction with consultation with public housing authorities, the City shall further encourage the residents of public and assisted housing developments, including their resident advisory boards, councils or management corporations, to participate in the development and implementation of the Con Plan and AFH. In addition to conducting required public hearings and providing public comment periods, the City will encourage citizen and organizational participation by conducting surveys, community outreach meetings, forming focus groups and engaging in other outreach processes. The City Manager or their designee may allow adjustments to the Organizational Participation process in conjunction with applicable waivers provided by HUD.
V. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS – PROCEDURES AND PROCESSES
Public Hearings and Comment Periods . Public hearings provide citizens, residents and organiz ations with opportunities to make oral and/or written comments on community needs and on the various planning documents described herein. Public hearings and other meetings shall be held at times and in locations convenient to potential and actual program beneficiaries. Providing time periods during which citizens, residents and other members of the public are given the opportunity to submit written and oral comments on draft documents published by the City (“Comment Period(s)”) , further facilitates
4 community input and feedback. The requirements for publishing notices of public hearings and Comment Periods, as well as publication of draft documents , are detailed below and further explained in the Summary Table.
Noticing Public Hearings . To ensure citizens, residents, and organizations are advised in advance of opportunities to attend and participate in public hearings, all public hearing notices shall adhere to the following unless otherwise waived by HUD and approved by the City Manager or their designee. Be published at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing date (unless the public hearing notice is combined with a thirty (30) day public comment notice, in which case notice will be published at least thirty (30) days prior to the close of the public comment period and the date of the public hearing as further described in Noticing Public Comment Periods, below. Be published in one or more newspapers of general circulation (as legal notices and/or display ads)
Be prepared in a language other than English when a significant number of non- English residents can reasonably expected to participate
Include the time, date and place of the hearing, a descript ion of the subject/purpose of the hearing, and where associated documents (if applicable) are posted or may otherwise be obtained Include information on how to request special accommodations Be posted on the City’s website ( https://www.victorvilleca.gov/government/legally-required- postings) on or before the date of publication
Be subject to the provision of additional forms of notice, including: posting and/or distributing notices at community locations such as the public library, hospitals, other public agency locations, specified locations at Victorville City Hall and in targe t neighborhoods; sending electronic mail to the EDDHD’s list of interested persons; and creation and distribution of supplemental flyers and/or mailers
Noticing Public Comment Periods . Comment Periods may be included in public hearing notices (provided the applicable advance comment period is accounted for). Comment Period notices shall adhere to the following unless otherwise waived by HUD and approved by the City Manager or their designee.
Be published prior to the commencement date of the applicable Comment Period Be published, prepared and posted in the manner provided for Noticing Public Hearings, above In cases where a public hearing is noticed in conjunction with a required Comment Period, provide for a Comment Period that ends prior to the date of the public hearing Include the time, date and place of any associated public hearing and how to request reasonable accommodations
Include the beginning and ending dates of the Comment Period; how and where comments may be submitted; a brief description of the subject matter/purpose of the document or item on which comment is being sought; a summary of the item or content of the documents; how/where full copies of any document(s) may be obtained; and the date the City Council will consider the approval of the item or document(s)
Be posted on the City’s website, various locations in and around City Hall, and in such other places as specified in Noticing Public Hearings, above
Publication of Draft Planning Documents . Notices of public hearings and Comment Periods shall contain summaries of the contents of any draft documents being provided for public review and comment (e.g., the AFH, Con Plan, AP and Revisions or Substantial Amendments). All such draft documents will be made available to members of the public “published” by the City by providing copies on its website, at City Hall, and in such other places as shall be specified in each applicable public hearing or Comment Period notice. Such notices will also contain instructions on how the public may request such documents in alternative formats for persons with disabilities.
5 Technical Assistance. Development Department staff will meet with groups or individuals representative of persons of low - and moderate -income upon request to provide them with technical assistance in commenting on the AFH, identifying specific needs, and/or developing/preparing project proposal applications for programs covered by the Con Plan.
6 Summary Table
Publication of Notices of Public Hearings and Comment Periods Document Publication of Public Hearing (PH) and
Comment Period (CP) Notices†
Minimum Number of
Public Hearings; Timing†
Comment
Period (CP)†
Con Plan /AP
PH Notice - At least 10 days†† prior to PH date
CP Notice - At least 30 days prior to date set
for close of CP and after draft(s) published. If
combined with PH Notice, CP Notice
publication must occur at least 30 days prior to
both the close of the CP and the PH date.
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
(if noticed separately after earlier publication of
CP Notice)
First Hearing:
Prior to drafting Con
Plan/AP
Second Hearing:
After publication of Con
Plan/AP draft and close of
CP
N/A
30 days
Substantial
Amendments
to Con Plan /
AP
CP Notice - At least 30 days prior to date set
for close of CP and after draft(s) published. If
combined with PH Notice, CP Notice
publication must occur at least 30 days prior to
both the close of the CP and the PH date.
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
(if noticed separately after earlier publication of
CP Notice)
One Hearing:
After publication of
Substantial Amendments
and close of CP
30 days
AFH
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
CP Notice - At least 30 days prior to date set
for close of CP and after draft(s) published. If
combined with PH Notice, CP Notice
publication must occur at least 30 days prior to
both the close of the CP and the PH date.
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
(if noticed separately after earlier publication of
CP Notice)
First Hearing:
After publication of HUD-
provided and other data
Second Hearing:
After publication of AFH
draft and close of CP (may
be combined with second
Con Plan hearing after
initial adoption of AFH)
N/A
30 days
AFH
Revisions
CP Notice - At least 30 days prior to date set
for close of CP and after draft(s) published. If
combined with PH Notice, CP Notice
publication must occur at least 30 days prior to
both the close of the CP and the PH date.
PH Notice - At least 10 days prior to PH date
(if noticed separately after earlier publication of
CP Notice)
One Hearing:
After publication of draft
Revisions and close of CP
30 days
CAPER
CP Notice - At least 15 days prior to CP close
Not required
15 days
† All required noticing requirements, mandatory public hearings, and comment periods can be adjusted in accordance with any waivers provided by HUD, as approved by the City Manager or their designee. †† All references days in this Summary table refer to calendar days
7 Consideration of Public Comments/Views. Prior to adopting the AFH, Con Plan, AP, CAPER and/or Revisions or Substantial Amendments, the City will consider any comments/view received from citizens and residents ( individuals or groups representing their interests) in writing during Comment Periods, or orally during public hearing(s). Such comments/views shall be summarized and attached to the final versions of the AFH, Con Plan, AP, any Revisions or Substantial Amendments, and the CAPE R as applicable.
Questions and Complaints. Development Department staff will answer all questions received from residents or their representative groups in the manner in which the questions were posed ( e.g., verbal responses to verbal requests, written responses to written requests). Written complaints and grievances received from residents or their representative groups relating to the Con Plan, AP, CAPER, AFH, and/or any Substantial Amendments or Revisions , shall be substantively responded to by Development Department staff within fifteen (15) working days of receipt, where practicable.
Access to / Availability of Records . The City will provide residents of the community, public agencies and other interested parties with reasonable and timely access to the AFH, Con Plan, AP, CAPER, CPP, all Substantial Amendments or Revisions, and information/records related to these documents (including the use of assistance under the CDBG and HOME programs for the preceding five (5) years) by:
Maintaining copies at City Hall for public inspection and m aking a reasonable number of copies (paper or electronic) of the AFH , Con Plan and CPP available to residents and other groups that request them free of charge
Making copies of other documents and records available in accordance with the California Public Records Act (direct costs of duplication may apply) Posting these documents and related information on the City’s website Maintaining copies of the final versions of the AFH, Con Plan, AP, CAPER and CPP on the City’s website, at City Hall and at the City’s Public Library Providing such documents and records in an accessible format for persons with disabilities, upon forty-eight (48) hours’ advance request
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); Accessibility. In compliance with the ADA, if special assistance to participate in public hearings and/or community or consultation meetings is needed, individuals should contact Development Department staff forty-eight ( 48) hours prior to the meeting or public hearing to ensure that the City will be able to make reasonable arrangements. Examples of assistance provided may include the following:
Auxiliary aids and services to communicate with people who have communication disabilities, such as providing a qualified reader; providing information on large print; or providing an audio recording of printed information for individuals who are blind, have vision loss, or are deaf-blind.
A “qualified” reader means someone who is able to read effectively, accurately, and impartially, using any necessary specialized vocabulary;
For people who are de af, have hearing loss, or are deaf -blind, the City may provide a qualified notetaker; a qualified sign language interpreter; written materials; or a printed script of a stock speech (such as given on a museum or historic house tour). A “qualified” interpre ter means someone who is able to interpret effectively, accurately, and impartially, both receptively ( i.e., understanding what the person with the disability is saying) and expressively (i.e., having the skill needed to convey information back to that person) using any necessary specialized vocabulary.
In addition, persons with disabilities may bring a “companion” to assist them. The term “companion” includes any family member, friend, or associate of a person who is an appropriate person with whom the City should communicate. Public hearings and other m eetings shall be held in areas that are handicap accessible and other accommodations shall be made upon request as noted above.
8 HUD Waivers. Should HUD temporarily suspend/adjust/waive any of the required noticing, comment or participation processes discussed herein regarding the development , review, or amendment of applicable assessments/plans, the City Manager or their designee may approve the application of any such waiver based upon a unique circumstance such as natural disaster, national emergency, state emergency, local emergency, major disaster declaration, etc. that necessitates the use of the waiver provided.
Review, Amendment and Availability of Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) . Prior to its adoption by the City Council, this CCP was made available for public review and comment and at least one public hearing was held. Future Substantial Amendments to the CPP will utilize the public hearing and Comment Period associated with the adoption of Substantial Amendments to the Con Plan.
Amended: May 5, 2020 (Amendments Underlined)
9 Community & Regionally Based Organizations
CHC California Housing Consortium
National Crime Prevention Council
National Coalition for the Homeless
Shelter Network
Latin-American Association
NAACP National Association for the Advancement of Colored People- California Branch NARF Native American Rights Fund
NOMAR National Organization for Mexican-American Rights Big Brothers Big Sisters
California Coalition for Youth
California Youth Advocacy Network
Americans United for Life
California Public Health Association – North
Department of Employment & Human Services
Department of Behavioral Health – San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership High Desert Homeless Services, Inc.
Victor Valley Domestic Violence, Inc.
Moses House Ministries
Legal Aid Society of San Bernardino
San Bernardino Sexual Assault Servicies
Victor Valley Community Services Council
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT C
2022-2023
CDBG/HOME Allocations
City of Victorville 2022-2023 HUD Allocations
CDBG Allocation (City of Victorville)
NAME CDBG21
Victorville $1,358,971
Funding Categories
Public Service (15%) - $203,846
Construction (65%) - $883,331
Administration (20%) - $271,794
HOME Allocation (Consortium)
NAME ST. Share ($) Share (%)
VV & AV Consortium CA $867,741 100.0%
Victorville CA $574,463 66%
Apple Valley CA $293,278 34%
Consortium Total Allocation - $867,741
Funding Categories
Housing Activities (75%) - $650,806
CHDO (15%) - $130,162
Administration (10%) - $86,773
Victorville Total Allocation - 66% = $574,463
Funding Categories
Housing Activities - $430,847
CHDO - $86,170
Administration - $28,723 ($57,446/2 = $28,723)
Apple Valley Total Allocation - 34% = $293,278
Funding Categories
Housing Activities - $219,959
CHDO - $43,992
Administration - $29,327
Administration - Victorville share - $28,723
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT D
CDBG Target Area Map
City Council Districts for 2020 Census & 2010 Approved CDBG Areas The City of Victorville
Printed: March 7th, 2022
Author: Brandon Krejckant - GIS Coordinator
Department: Information Technology - GIS Division
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS FOR 2020 CENSUS & 2010 APPROVED CDBG AREAS Disclaimer: Victorville GIS Data is made available for general reference purposes only and should not be used or relied upon without independent verification.
The most current CDGB data is 2010. The City of Victorville does not warrant data accuracy or completeness, nor will the City of Victorville accept liability of any kind in conjunction with its use.
District 2 District 4
District 1
District 3
District 5µ
0 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.20.4
Miles
City of Victorville, Bureau of Land Management, Esri, HERE, Garmin, GeoTechnologies, Inc., USGS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA Districts
1 2
3 4
5 CDBG Areas
Victorville City Boundary
Item Number: 2
City Council / Board of Directors
Public Hearing(s)
Meeting of: February 21, 2023
Submitted By:
Brian Gengler, City Engineer
Subject:
Sewer Main Lining 2023 Project – Award of Construction Contract Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
1) Open and conduct a Public Hearing;
2) Close the Public Hearing;
3) Find the project exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301(b) of the CEQA guidelines and Approve the Notice of Exemption; and
4) Award a construction contract to Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp., in the amount of $1,813,690.00 for the Sewer Main Lining 2023 Project.
Fiscal Impact:
This action will result in fiscal impact of $1,813,690.00. This project is funded by the Sewer Fund, No. 425. An additional appropriation is not required. There are sufficient funds available in the project budget to cover the planned expenses. Please refer to the budget account number, description, and the available budget shown below:
Account Number Account Description Amount Available
4254500-55315-77444 Sewer Main Lining –
Phase II
$1,948,555.40
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Goal E., Strategy 1 In the Strategic Plan, “Invest in Infrastructure” and “Implement the City’s Capital Improvement Program to meet community needs.” This project will result in investing in the City’s infrastructure by prolonging the useful life of sewer mains. This project was included in the City’s capital improvement program to meet the community’s need for a reliable sewer collection system. 3 0
0 4
Background:
In 2018, the City performed a video inspection and condition assessment of nearly the entire sewer collection system. The City contracted with Pro-pipe Inc., a professional pipeline inspection services contractor to perform closed circuit television video (CCTV) sewer inspections in accordance with the National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO) standards.
In addition, Pro-pipe subcontracted with Project Engineering Consultants to analyze the CCTV data provided by Pro-pipe, complete a risk assessment of each sewer pipe segment, and develop prioritized rehabilitation recommendations in accordance with the Pipeline Assessment Certification Program (PACP). A condition assessment report was prepared with recommendations for rehabilitating certain segments of sewer mains in poor condition.
Sewer pipes need rehabilitation if they are in a deteriorated (structurally deficient) condition, with cracked or broken pipes. In the past, the most common construction approach to rehabilitating a sewer was replacement via open cut excavation. However, over the past 30 years, sewer rehabilitation via trenchless technology, such as cured-in- place pipe (CIPP) lining, has become more practical and less expensive than the traditional open cut excavation method. CIPP lining is a technology that utilizes the existing pipe by inserting a resin-impregnated tube into the pipe. This results in a seamless, jointless surface which provides complete structural support and strength to the pipe and significantly extends its useful life.
Discussion:
This project involves rehabilitating 23,822 lineal feet of 8, 10, and 12-inch structurally deficient sanitary sewers and 511 sewer laterals in the Old Town area. Please refer to Attachment A, a location map. This project is the second of several planned sewer lining projects throughout the City in the upcoming years as identified in the condition assessment report referenced above. This project is consistent with a category of projects which will correct structural deficiencies in sewer mains that were included in the Sewer Rate Plan, which was approved by City Council in 2018.
It is a routine requirement to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) before construction starts on a capital improvement project. A Notice of Exemption describes the project activities and states that the project is categorically exempt under CEQA Section 15301(b) which pertains to existing facilities, including publicly owned sewer facilities. Please refer to Attachment B, the Notice of Exemption.
This project was advertised in accordance with Victorville Municipal Code §2.28.210 and the California Public Contract Code. Formal bidding procedures are used for Public Works contracts with an estimated cost exceeding five hundred thousand dollars. On December 21, 2022, a Notice Inviting Bids was e-mailed to potential bidders, posted on the City of Victorville website, and Ebidboard, and published in newspapers of general circulation within the City. On January 26, 2023, four formal bids were received, publicly opened and read aloud.
3 0
0 4
The Engineer’s estimate for this project was $1,800,000 to $2,000,000. The following is a list of all bidders:
Contractor Bid Amount
Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp. $1,813,690.00
Sancon Technologies, Inc $1,860,687.00
Instituform Technologies,Inc $2,133,482.00
Nu Line Technologies, LLC $2,159,312.00
After a review of the bid proposals, it was determined that the lowest responsive and responsible bidder is Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp., with a bid amount of $1,813,690.00. Therefore, staff recommends awarding a construction contract to Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp. Please refer to Attachment C, the construction contract, which includes the contract bid items and total contract amount.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Notice of Exemption and award a construction contract to Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp., in the amount of $1,813,690.00 for the Sewer Main Lining 2023 Project.
Staff is available for any questions Council may have.
Attachments: A. Location Map
B. Notice of Exemption
C. Construction Contract
ATTACHMENT A
ATTACHMENT B
Statutory Exemptions. State code number:
_______________________________________________
Print Form
Notice of Exemption Appendix E
From: (Public Agency): ____________________________
To: Office of Planning and Research
P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 _______________________________________________Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 County Clerk
(Address)
___________________________
___________________________
County of: __________________
Project Title: ____________________________________________________________________________ Project Applicant: ________________________________________________________________________ Project Location - Specific:
Project Location - City: ______________________ Project Location - County:
Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:
_____________________
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: _____________________________________________________ Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: ________________________________________________ Exempt Status: (check one):
Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
Reasons why project is exempt:
Lead Agency
Contact Person: ____________________________
Area Code/Telephone/Extension: _______________
If filed by applicant:
1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No
Signature: ____________________________ Date:
Signed by Lead Agency
Signed by Applicant
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code. Date Received for filing at OPR:
Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. _______________
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: ____________________________________ ______________________________________________
______________ Title: _______________________
Revised 2011
City of Victorville
385 North Arrowhead Ave, Second Floor
Sewer Main Lining 2023
City of Victorville
Victorville
San Bernardino
City of Victorville
City of Victorville
X
Brian Gengler, City Engineer
(760) 955-5157
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
San Bernardino
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0130
Install resin-impregnated cured-in-place pipe liner in existing sewer pipes.
South of I-15 Fwy, East of Yucca Ave, West of Mojave River, & North of Mojave Drive Class 1 (15301b)
This project will repair existing damaged or broken sewer pipes via trenchless technology without open excavation.
■
■
ATTACHMENT C
1 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT B Y AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE AND
SOUTHWEST PIPELINE AND TRENCHLESS CORP.
FOR
SEWER MAIN LINING PROJECT 2023
CITY PROJECT NO. CC23-067
THIS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (the “Contract”) dated
______________________ for reference purposes only is made and entered into by and between the City of Victorville, a municipal corporation and charter city located in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, and Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “Contractor”. The City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter referred to as a “Party” and collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the City requires construction of Sewer Main Lining Project 2023 as more fully described in the solicitation documents issued by the City for Project No.
CC23-067 (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, on December 21, 2022, the City issued a Notice Inviting Bids and solicitation documents to prospective bidders for the Project. In response, Contractor submitted a Bid which the City determined to be the lowest responsive and responsible bid; and
WHEREAS, Contractor is a duly organized Corporation in good standing in the State of California, and represents that it has the background, knowledge, experience, expertise and resources to perform the Work and other obligations encompassed by this Contract; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting held on ________________________, the Victorville City Council duly accepted Contractor’s Bid for the Project and directed that a written agreement for the Project be entered into with Contractor; and WHEREAS, in light of the facts set forth above and the certifications made by Contractor as part of its Bid, the City desires to retain Contractor to perform the construction Work for the Project as set forth in this Contract and in the Contract Documents, as hereinafter described.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE COVENANTS,
CONDITIONS, AND PROMISES CONTAINED HEREIN AND FOR SUCH OTHER
GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
2 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
Section 1. RECITALS
The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this Contract by this reference, as though set forth herein.
Section 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
a. Contract Documents. The Contract Documents consist of the following documents, all of which are either attached hereto as exhibits or are incorporated herein by this reference. Said Contact Documents are complementary; what is called for in one is binding as if called for in all, and together constitute Contractor’s performance obligations:
(1) This Contract and its attached Exhibits, subject to the limitations in Sections 9 and 20 with respect to Exhibit “A” (Contractor’s submitted Bid Proposal as accepted by the City);
(2) Change Orders issued and approved by the City;
(3) Regulatory Permits from other agencies specified in Appendices A and B of the bid package or as may otherwise be required by law;
(4) Bid Addenda issued by the City;
(5) Notice Inviting Bids and Instructions to Bidders;
(6) Special Provisions
(7) Greenbook 2021 Edition
(8) Appendices
(9) Plans
(10) Bid Forms and attachment thereto;
(11) Faithful Performance Bond;
(12) Payment Bond.
a. Interpretation. In the event of any con flict between any of the Contract Documents, the document highest in the order of precedence (from highest to lowest), as set forth in Subsection a. above shall control.
b. Definitions. Unless specifically defined or assigned a meaning in this Contract, or the context clearly indicates otherwise, capitalized terms herein shall have the meaning assigned to them in the “Definitions” section of the Instructions to Bidders document.
Section 3. CONTRACTOR’S OBLIGATIONS
Contractor will perform all of the Work required for the Project, as specified in the Contract Documents. Contractor must provide, furnish, and supply all things necessary and incidental for the timely performance and completion of the Work, including all necessary labor, materials, supplies, tools, equipment, transportation, onsite facilities, and utilities, unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. Contractor must use its best efforts to diligently prosecute and complete the Work in a professional and expeditious manner and to meet or exceed the performance standards required by the Contract Documents, and to the satisfaction of Brian Gengler, City Engineer, or his designee (hereinafter the “Project Manager”).
3 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
Section 4. CONTRACT PRICE; PAYMENT AND RETENTION
a. As full and complete compensation for Contractor’s timely performance and completion of the Work in strict accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract Documents, City will pay Contractor ONE MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED THIRTEEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED NINETY AND 00/100 DOLLARS , ($ 1,813,690.00) (the “Contract Price”) for all of Contractor’s direct and indirect costs to perform the Work, including all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, taxes, insurance, bonds and all overhead costs, in accordance with Contractor’s Bid Proposal (attached hereto as Exhibit “A”) subject to the provisions of this Contract and the Contract Documents. b. Procedures relating to payment and retention are set forth in the Special Provisions.
Section 5. CONTRACT TIME; NOTICE TO PROCEED
a. Contract Time. The Work under this Agreement shall be diligently prosecuted to completion before expiration of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY (150) WORKING DAYS, commencing within Fifteen (15) calendar days after the issuance of the Notice to Proceed. The City will not issue a Notice to Proceed to the Contractor until this Contract, including bonds and insurance documents, have been executed and/or approved by the City.
b. N
otice to Proceed. No work, service, material, or equipment shall be performed or furnished under this Contract unless and until a Notice to Proceed has been given to the Contractor by the City. Contractor shall commence Work pursuant to the Contract Documents and as directed by the City in the Notice to Proceed, and diligently execute the same to completion within the Contract Time.
Section 6. DI
SPUTE RESOLUTION AND CLAIMS PROCEDURES
a. Public Contract Code Section 9204. For purposes of any Public Works Claims filed by a Contractor or Subcontractor (as those terms are defined in Public Contract Code Section 9204) under this Contract, the claims procedures in Public Contract Code Section 9204 (“ Section 9204”) and the provisions of this Section shall apply. Public Contract Code Section 9204 is set forth in full in Section 2-10 of the Special Provisions.
i) In the event of a Section 9204 Public Works Claim, Contractor may not stop working pending resolution of the dispute, but must continue to comply with its duty to diligently prosecute the performance and timely completion of the Work during the Section 9204 process.
ii) Any Public Works Claims not resolved by the Section 9204 procedures (and/or any tort claims) shall be subject to Section 2.24.020 of the Victorville Municipal Code (“VMC”) and the provisions of the Government Claims Act (Government Code section 810 et seq.).
b. For disputes or claims that do not constitute Public Works Claims, City and Contractor agree to comply with the following process:
4 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
• Each Party shall designate a senior management or executive level representative to negotiate any dispute.
• The representatives shall attempt, through good faith negotiations, to resolve the dispute by any means within their authority.
• If the issue remains unresolved after ten (10) days of good faith negotiations, the Parties shall attempt to resolve the disagreement by negotiation betw een the legal counsel for each Party. If the above process fails, the Parties may mutually agree to engage in non- binding mediation or arbitration in which the Parties equally share the costs of any mediator or arbitrator, or may proceed with suit or other remedies, subject to the provisions of subparagraph (5) of this Subsection and other applicable provisions and laws.
• The alternative dispute resolution process set forth herein is a material condition to Contract and must be exhausted as an administrative remedy prior to either Party initiating legal action.
• Compliance with VMC Section 2.24.020 and the provisions of the Government Claims Act (Government Code section 810 et seq.) is also required prior to initiating suit again the City.
Section 7. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CONVENIENCE
a. The City may, by providing thirty (30) days' advance written notice to Contractor, terminate this Agreement in whole or in part, whenever the City shall determine that such termination is in the best interests of the City, or when it becomes impracticable or impossible to proceed, or because of conditions or events beyond the control of the City. Any such termination shall be affected by delivery to Contractor of a Notice of Termination for Convenience, specifying the extent to which performance of Work under this Agreement is terminated, and the date upon which such termination becomes effective. Upon such termination, the obligations of the Contractor for portions of the Work already performed shall continue.
b. Upon receipt of a Notice of Termination for Convenience, the Contractor shall, unless the notice directs otherwise, do the following:
(1) Immediately discontinue the Work to the extent specified in the notice.
(2) Place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, equipment, services, or facilities, except as may be necessary to complete such portion(s) of the Work that are not to be discontinued.
(3) Promptly cancel, on the most favorable terms reasonably possible, all subcontracts to the extent that they relate to the performance of the discontinued portion of the Work.
(4) Thereafter do only such Work as may be necessary to preserve and protect the Work already in progress and to protect materials, plants, and equipment on the Project site or in transit thereto.
5 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
c. Upon such termination, the Contractor will be paid without duplication for:
(1) Work completed in accordance with the Contract Documents prior to the effective date of the Notice of Termination for Convenience;
(2) Reasonable costs incurred in settlement of terminated contracts with Subcontractors, suppliers, and others; and
(3) Reasonable expenses directly attributable to termination.
The Contractor shall submit a final termination settlement proposal to the City no later than ninety (90) days from the effective date of termination, unless extended in writing by the City, upon written request by the Contractor. If the Contractor fails to submit a proposal, the City may determine the amount, if any, due the Contractor as a result of the termination. The City will pay the Contractor the amount it determines is reasonable. If the Contractor disagrees with the amount determined by the City as being reasonable, the Contractor shall provide notice to the City within thirty (30) Days of receipt of payment. Any amount due shall be subject to the dispute resolution provisions set forth in the Contract Documents.
d. Contractor shall include provisions in all of its subcontracts, purchase orders, and other contracts permitting termination for convenience by Contractor on terms that are consistent with this Contract and that afford no greater rights of recovery against Contractor than are afforded to Contractor under this Section 7.
Section 8. TERMINATION FOR CONTRACTOR’S DEFAULT
a. Default. The City may terminate this Contract for Contractor’s default as set forth in this Section. The City will consider the Contractor in default of this Contract if, prior to the City’s acceptance of the Work, the Contractor:
(1) becomes insolvent, assigns its assets for the benefit of its creditors, is unable to pay its debts as they become due, or is otherwise financially unable to complete the Work;
(2) abandons the Work by failing to report to the Work site and diligently prosecute the Work to completion;
(3) disregards written instructions from the City or materially violates provisions of the Contract Documents;
(4) fails to prosecute the Work according to the schedule approved by the Engineer,
(5) disregards laws or regulations of any public body having jurisdiction, or (6) commits continuous or repeated violations of regulatory or statutory safety requirements.
Notices, and other written communications regarding default between the Contractor, the City, and the Surety shall be transmitted in accordance with Section 21 of this Contract. 6 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
b. Notice and Opportunity to Cure. The City will issue a written notice to cure the default to the Contractor and its Surety. The Contractor shall commence satisfactory corrective actions within five (5) Working Days after receipt. If the Contractor fails to commence satisfactory corrective action within five (5) Working Days after receipt of the notice to cure, or to diligently continue satisfactory and timely correction of the default thereafter, the City will consider the Contractor in default of the Contract and:
(1) will terminate the Contractor’s right to perform under the Contract by issuing a written notice of termination for default to the Contractor and its Surety; (2) may use any materials, equipment, tools or other facilities furnished by the Contractor to secure and maintain the Work site, and
(3) may furnish labor, equipment, a nd materials the City deems necessary to secure and maintain the Job Site;
c. Remedies Cumulative. The provisions of this Section shall be in addition to all other legal rights and remedies available to the City. Termination of this Contract will not relieve the Surety of its obligation for any just claims arising out of the Work performed.
Section 9. PR EVAILING WAGE
a. Compliance with State Prevailing Wage Requirements. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773, the City has obtained the prevailing rate of per diem wages and the prevailing wage rate for holiday and overtime work applicable in San Bernardino County, California from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to perform the Work required under this Contract.
A copy of these prevailing wage rates are on file at the City’s Finance Department/Purchasing Division and shall be made available for review to any interested party on request. In addition, a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages may be obtained via the internet at:
http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/PWD. Contractor and all
Subcontractors shall pay not less than said specified State of California rates to all workers employed by them in the execution of the Work contemplated by this Contract, including workers performing Work covered by under Labor Code S ections 1720 and 1720.9. Contractor shall be responsible for using the correct and current prevailing wage rates. Contractor shall be solely responsible for using the correct wage decision or determination and performing accordingly. An error on the part of any awarding body does not relieve the Contractor from the responsibility for payment of the correct prevailing wage.
b. Conflict. It is further expressly agreed by and between the Parties hereto that should there be any conflict between the terms of this Section 9 and the provisions of Exhibit “A” , the terms of this Section 9 shall control, and nothing herein shall be considered as an acceptance of the terms of Contractor’s Submitted Bid Proposal conflicting with the requirements of this Section 9.
c. Payroll Records. Contractor must comply with the provisions of Labor Code sections 1776 and 1812 and all implementing regulations, including without limitation, those set forth in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 16000 et seq . 7 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
(hereinafter the “Regulations”), which are fully incorporated by this reference, including requirements for electronic submission of payroll records to the DIR. (1) Contractor and Subcontractor Obligations. Contractor and each Subcontractor must keep accurate payroll records, showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed in connection with the Work. Each payroll record must contain or be verified by a written declaration that it is made under penalty of perjury, stating both of the following:
(a) The information contained in the payroll record is true and correct; and
(b) Contractor or the Subcontractor has complied with the requirements of Labor Code §§ 1771, 1811, and 1815 for any Work performed by its employees on the Project.
(2) Certified Record. A certified copy of an employee’s payroll record must be made available for inspection or furnished to the employee or his or her authorized representative on request, to City, to the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, to the Division of Apprenticeship Standards of the DIR, and as further required by the Labor Code.
(3) E
nforcement . Upon notice of noncompliance with Labor Code § 1776, Contractor or Subcontractor has ten days in which to comply with the requirements of this section. If Contractor or Subcontractor fails to do so within the ten- day period, Contractor or Subcontractor will forfeit a penalty of $100.00 per day, or portion a day, for each worker for whom compliance is required, until strict compliance is achieved. Upon request by the Division of Apprenticeship Standards, or the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, these penalties will be withheld from payments then due to Contractor.
d. Apprentices. Contractor is responsible for compliance with the requirements governing employment and payment of apprentices, as set forth in Labor Code section 1777.5, which is fully incorporated by reference. e. Notices. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1771.4, Contractor is required to post all Job Site notices, including prevailing wage rates and other notices as required by regulation.
f. Other Labor Requirements. Contractor has the responsibility for and shall comply with all other requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., the Regulations, and all other applicable State labor laws. Contractor further acknowledges and agrees that it will be independently responsible for reviewing the applicable laws and regulations and effectuating compliance with those laws. Contractor will require the same of all its Subcontractors.
g. Statutory Penalties . The statutory penalties for failure to pay prevailing wage or to comply with State wage and hour laws will be enforced as follows:
8 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
(1) Pursuant to Labor Code section 1775, the Contractor and any Subcontractor under it shall forfeit as a penalty to the City not more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00), for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing wage rate as determined by the Director of the DIR for such work or craft in which such worker is employed for any public work done under this Contract by it or by any Subcontractor under it. The difference between such prevailing wage rate and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day or portion thereof, for which each worker was paid less than the prevailing wage rate, shall be paid to each worker by the Contractor. (2) The Contractor or Subcontractor shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of this Contract by the respective contractor or Subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of this subsection. In awarding any contract for public work, Contractor must forfeit to City Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) per day for each worker who works in excess of the minimum working hours when Contractor does not pay overtime. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1810 et seq., eight (8) hours is the legal working day.
h. DIR Monitoring. Pursuant to Labor Code § 1771.4, the Contract for this Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. i. DIR Registration. Pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Contractor and its Subcontractors must be registered with the DIR prior to the execution of a contract to perform public works. By entering into this Contract, Contractor represents that it is aware of the registration requirement and is currently registered with the DIR. Contractor shall maintain a current registration for the duration of the Project.
Contractor shall further include the requirements of Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 in any subcontract and ensure that all Subcontractors are registered at the time this Contract is entered into and maintain registration for the duration of the Project.
Section 10
. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
If Contractor fails to complete the Work within the Contract Time, City will assess liquidated damages in the amount of Two Thousand Dollars ($ 2,000.00) per day for each day of unexcused delay in completion, and such liquidated damages may be deducted from City’s payments due or to become due to Contractor under this Contract.
Section 11 . COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
Contractor shall comply with all Laws applicable to the performance of the Work required by the Contract Documents, including any rule, regulation, or bylaw governing the conduct or performance of Contractor, its employees, officers, board members, agents, independent contractors, and Subcontractors. Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, all required permits and licenses, including a City business license, shall be held or obtained by the Contractor at its sole expense and prior to commencing any Work hereunder.
9 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
Section 12. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Labor Code § 1861, by signing this Contract, Contractor certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Labor Code § 3700 which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self -insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work on this Contract.” Section 13. INSURANCE
a. Contractor shall procure and maintain at its own expense at all times during the period covered by this Contract (and through the one -year guarantee period following the date of City’s acceptance of the Project) the following policies of insurance:
(1) Commercial General Liability (“CGL”) Insurance : Insurance Services Office (ISO) Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $5,000,000 per occurrence resulting from the acts or omissions of the Contractor or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents, and independent contractors. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2) Commercial Vehicle Liability Insurance: Covering person injury and property damage, of not less than Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) combined single limit, covering any vehicle utilized by Contractor or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, or agents and independent contractors in performing the Work required by this Contract..
(3) Workers’ Compensation Insurance: Providing coverage as required by the California State Workers’ Compensation Law and Employers’ Liability insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. If any class of employees employed by Contractor is not protected by the California State Workers’ Compensation Law, Contractor shall provide adequate insurance for the protection of such employees to the satisfaction of the City.
(4) Course of Construction, Builders’ Risk, or Inland Marine Insurance for Work on Site : Issued on an occurrence basis, for all -risk or “all perils” coverage on a 100% completed value basis on the insurable portion of the Project for the benefit of City, that offers “Installation” coverage for all materials, supplies, equipment, and property obtained by, or for Contractor, which is to become part of th e Work while such equipment and property is stored at the jobsite, at temporary locations, or while in transit to the Project from such temporary locations. Contractor shall also be responsible for insuring its owned, leased/rented, or borrowed equipment.
(a) City of Victorville shall be named as a Loss Payee. (b) If the Project does not involve new or major reconstruction, at the 10 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
option of the City, an Installation Floater may be acceptable. For such projects, a Property Installation Floater shall be obtained that provides for the improvement, remodel, modification, alteration, conversion or adjustment to existing buildings, structures, processes, machinery, and equipment. The Property Installation Floater shall provide property damage coverage for any building, structure, machinery, or equipment damaged, impaired, broken, or destroyed during the performance of the Work, including during transit, installation, and testing at the Project/Work site.
b. Additional Insurance Requirements . With respect to the policies of insurance set forth above, compliance with the following is also required:
(1) Additional Insureds. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any required insurance policies or any subsequent endorsements attached thereto, the protection offered by all policies, except for Workers' Compensation coverage, shall bear an endorsement whereby it is provided that, the City and its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors, including, without limitation, the City Attorney, are named as Additional Insureds. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Victorville, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers.
(2) W
aiver of Subrogati on Rights. Contractor shall require the carriers of all required insurance policies to waive all rights of subrogation against the City and its elected or appointed officers, officials, volunteers, employees, contractors, and subcontractors. Each policy of insurance shall be endorsed to reflect such waiver. (3) S
ufficiency of Insurers . Contractor must secure all policies of insurance required by this Contract from a good and responsible company or companies authorized to do insurance business in the State of California, with an AM Best’s rating of not less than A;VII.
(4) P
roof of Insurance Coverage Required Prior to Commencement of Work .
Within ten (10) days of the date Contractor receives this Contract from the City for execution (following award of same by the City Council), certificates of insurance evidencing the policies of insurance, coverages, and endorsements required by this Contract and satisfactory to and approved by the City shall be furnished by Contractor to the City’s Risk Manager. In no event shall any Work on the Project be permitted to commence until adequate proof of insurance and endorsements have been so furnished.
(5) S
pecial Provisions. Any additional insurance requirements set forth in Section 5-4 of the Special Provisions shall also apply to this Contract. (6) O ther Required Endorsements .
(a) The policies shall be endorsed to provide that in the event of cancellation or amendment of any required insurance policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by mail, postage prepaid, not less than 11 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
thirty (30) days before the cancellation or amendment is effective. In the case of cancellation for non-payment, ten (10) days advance written notice shall be given.
(b) The CGL and vehicle liability policies shall be endorsed as Primary and Non-contributory.
c. Subcontractors. Contractor must ensure that each Subcontractor is required to obtain and maintain the same insurance coverage required under this Section 13 with respect to its performance of Work on the Project, including those requireme nts related to the Additional Insureds and waiver of subrogation. Contractor must confirm that each Subcontractor has complied with these insurance requirements before the Subcontractor is permitted to begin Work on the Project. Upon request by the City, Contractor must provide certificates and endorsements submitted by each Subcontractor to prove compliance with this requirement. The insurance requirements for Subcontractors do not replace or limit the Contractor’s insurance obligations. d. P
ollution Liabili ty Insurance, providing coverage for bodily injury, property damage, including cleanup costs and defense costs resulting from sudden, accidental and gradual pollution conditions, including the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, hydrocarbons, liquids or gases, waste materials or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants into or upon land, the atmosphere or any water course or body of water. The minimum limit shall be Two Million ($2,000,000) each occurrence or claim.
Section 14. Reserved.
Section 15. TIME OF THE ESSENCE
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Contract.
Section 16. INDEMNIFICATION
a. Notwithstanding the limits of any insurance and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify the City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, suits, claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities, (hereinafter " Claims or Liabilities") that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising or alleged to arise out of or in connection with the per formance of the Work, operations, or activities of Contractor, its agents, employees, Subcontractors, or invitees on the Project, or arising or alleged to arise from the acts or omissions of Contractor hereunder, or arising or alleged to arise from Contrac tor's performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Contract, but excluding such Claims or Liabilities or portion of such Claims or Liabilities arising or alleged to arise from the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, agents, volunteers, or employees, and in connection therewith:
12 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
(1) Contractor will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said Claims or Liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection therewith;
(2) Contractor will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, agents, volunteers, or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising or alleged to arise out of or in connection with Contractor's (or its agents', employees', Subcontractors' or invitees') performance of or failure to perform such Work, operations or activities hereunder; and Contractor agrees to save and hold the City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees harmless therefrom; (3) In the event the City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, agents, volunteers, or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Contractor for such damages or other claims arising or alleged to arise out of or in connection with the performance of or failure to perform the Work, operation, or activities of Contractor hereunder, Contractor shall pay to the City, its elected or appointed officials, officers, agents ,volunteers, or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents, volunteers, or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys' fees for counsel acceptable to City;
(4) Contractor's duty to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless as set out in this Section shall include any claims, liabilities, obligations, losses, demands, actions, penalties, suits, costs, expenses or damages or injury to persons or property arising or alleged to arise from, in connection with, as a consequence of, or pursuant to any state or federal law or regulation regarding hazardous substances, including but not limited to, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act ("FIFRA"), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA"), the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984, the Hazardous Material Transportation Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the California Hazardous Substance Account Act, the California Hazardous Waste Control Law or the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, as any of those statutes may be amended from time to time.
b. City will timely notify Contractor upon receipt of any third -party claim relating to the Contract, as required by Public Contract Code § 9201. The Contractor's indemnification and defense obligations pursuant to this Section shall survive the termination of this Contract. Contractor shall require the same indemnification from all Subcontractors.
Section 17. REPORTS; BOOKS AND RECORDS; AUDIT
a. Upon request by the Project Manager Contractor shall prepare and submit reports concerning Contractor's performance of the Work required by this Contract. 13 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
b. Contractor shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the work required by this Contract and enable the Project Manager to evaluate the cost and the performance of such Work.
c. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Project Manager shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such records. d. Records and supporting documents pertaining to the use of funds paid to Contractor hereunder shall be retained by Contractor and made available to the Project Manager for purposes of performing an audit for a period of five (5) years from the date of termination of this Contract.
Section 18. MODIFICATIONS AND AMENDMENTS
This Contract may be modified or amended only by written Change Orders as specified in the Contract Documents or a written instrument signed by both Parties.
Section 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a. This Contract supersedes any and all prior or contemporaneous agreements, either oral or written, between the City and Contractor with respect to the subject matter of this Contract.
b. The Contract Documents contain all of the covenants and agreements between the Parties with respect to the subject matter herein, and each Party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any Party, except those covenants and agreements in this Contract and the Contract Documents incorporated herein. c. No agreement, statement, or promise with respect to the subject matter of the Contract Documents, which is not contained in the Contract Documents, or in a valid modification or amendment to the Contract Documents, shall be valid or binding on either Party.
Section 20. AMBIGUITIES
This Contract is in all respects intended by each Party hereto to be deemed and construed to have been jointly prepared by the Parties and the Parties hereby expressly agree that any uncertainty or ambiguity existing herein shall not be interpreted against either of them. Except as expressly limited by this paragraph, all of the applicable rules of interpretation of contract shall govern the interpretation of any uncertainty or ambiguity of this Contract. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties agree that Exhibit “A” is attached hereto for reference purposes, and to the extent there are any ambiguities, inconsistencies, or conflicts between the terms of this Contract and Exhibit “A”, the terms of this Contract shall control and nothing set forth in Exhibit “A” shall be deemed to supersede any of the provisions of this Contract.
14 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
Section 21. NOTICES
a. Any notice to be provided pursuant to this Contract shall be in writing, and all such notices shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the Parties as follows:
To City: Brian Gengler, City Engineer
Engineering Department
City of Victorville
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
To Contractor: Justin Duchaineau, President
Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp.
22118 Vermont Ave.
Torrance, CA 90502
To Surety: _______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
b. Notices, payments, and other documents shall be deemed delivered upon receipt by personal service or as of the second (2nd) day after deposit in the United States mail.
c. Either Party, or the surety, may change its address by giving notice in writing to all other parties listed above, and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to such new address.
Section 22. NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to Contractor, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount, which may become due to Contractor or to its successor(s), or for any breach of any obligation of the terms of this Contract.
Section 23. REVIEW BY ATTORNEYS
Each Party hereto has had its attorneys review this Contract and all related documents.
Each Party hereto has consulted with its attorneys and has negotiated the terms of this Contract based on such consultation.
Section 24. BONDS
Concurrently with the execution of this Contract by the Contractor, and before the commencement of any Work, Contractor shall furnish to the City a Faithful Performance 15 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
Bond, and a Payment (Labor and Materials Bond) each in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Contract Price written on the forms included in the Contract Documents. These bonds must remain in force until the later of (1) the expiration of the one-year guarantee period; or (2) on one year from the date of completion of the corrective Work. Such bonds must be issued by a responsible corporate Surety, licensed and authorized to issue such bonds in the State of California with an AM Best’s Rating of at least A: VII.
Section 25. CARE
OF WORK
Contractor must adopt reasonable methods during the life of the Contract to furnish continuous protection to the Work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies, and other components to prevent losses or damages, and will be responsible for all damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Work by the City, except those losses or damages as may be caused by the City’s own negligence. The performance of the Work by Contractor or the payment of money by the City shall not relieve Contractor from any obliga tion to correct any incomplete, inaccurate, or defective Work (including the obligation to remedy any defective Work or materials during the one- year guarantee period after the City’s acceptance thereof) at no further cost to the City.
Section 26. CAPTIONS AND HEADINGS
The captions and headings contained in this Contract are provided for identification purposes only and shall not be interpreted to limit or define the content of the provisions described under the respective caption or heading.
Section 27. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
No portion of the Contract Documents may be used for any purpose other than construction of the Project, without prior written consent from City. Contractor is deemed to have conveyed the copyright in any designs, drawings, specifications, Shop Drawings, or other documents (in paper or electronic form) developed by Contractor for the Project, and City will retain all rights to such works, including the right to possession.
Section 28. SUCCESSORS, HEIRS, AND ASSIGNS
Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this Contract shall be binding upon the successors, endorsees, assigns, heirs, and personal representatives of each of the Parties and, likewise, shall inure to the benefit of the successors, endorsees, assigns, heirs, and personal representatives of each of the Parties. This Contract may not be assigned or transferred by Contractor without the concurrence of the surety and express written consent of the City.
Section 29. GENDER; PLURAL
In this Contract, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the masculine, feminine and neuter genders and the singular and the plural shall include one another.
Section 30. SEVERABILITY
If any one or more of the sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained herein is declared invalid, void, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same 16 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
shall be deemed severable from the remainder of this Contract and shall not affect, impair, or invalidate any of the remaining sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained herein.
Section 31. GOVERNING LAW
The validity of this Contract and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the Parties under this Contract, shall be construed pursuant to and in accordance with California law.
Section 32. CUMULATIVE REMEDIES
Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Contract, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default of any other default by the other Party.
Section 33. VENUE
All proceedings involving disputes over the terms, provisions, covenants, or conditions contained in this Contract and all proceedings involving any enforcement action related to this Contract shall be initiated and conducted in the applicable court or forum in San Bernardino County, California.
Section 34. EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTRACT
This Contract shall not be binding upon the City until signed by the authorized representative(s) of Contractor, approved by the City’s Risk Manager, and executed by the authorized City personnel or the Mayor.
Section 35. REPRESENTATIONS OF PARTIES AND PERSONS EXECUTING
CONTRACT
Each of the Parties to this Contract hereby represents that all necessary and appropriate actions of their governing bodies have been taken to make this Contract a binding obligation of each of the Parties hereto. The persons executing this Contract warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of and bind the Parties each purports to represent.
Section 36. WAIVER
No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting Party on any default under this Contract shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. A Party's consent to or approval of any act by the other Party requiring the Party's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the other Party's consent to or approval of any subsequent act. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Contract.
17 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
Section 37. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS
Contractor is an independent contractor. All persons working for or under the direction of the Contractor are the Contractor's employees, agents, or subcontractors, and they shall not be deemed agents, servants, or employees of the City.
Section 38. COUNTERPARTS
This Contract may be executed by the Parties in counterparts, and when executed by each of the Parties, each counterpart shall be deemed to be a part of this Contract.
Section 39. PROVISIONS REQUIRED BY LAW DEEMED INSERTED
Each and every provision of law and clause required by Law to be inserted in this Contract shall be deemed to be inserted herein and the Contract shall be read and enforced as though it were included herein, and if through mistake or otherwise any such provision is not inserted, or is not currently inserted, then upon application of either Party the Contract shall forthwith be physically amended to make such insertion or correction.
Section 40. ATTORNEY'S FEES
If either Party commences an action against the other Party, either legal, administrative, or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Contract, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all other costs of such action.
(END OF THIS PAGE – SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)
18 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed as of the dates written below.
T
HE CITY OF VICTORVILLE SOUTHWEST PIPELINE AND
TRENCHLESS CORP.
By: By: ___________________________
Debra Jones, Mayor Contractor Authorized Officer(s)
_J ustin Duchaineau___________
Na me
_Pr esident___________________
T itle
Dated:__________________________ Dated:_________________________ A
TTEST
By:
Jennifer Thompson, C ity Clerk
Dated:
AP
PROVED AS TO STANDARD FORM
By:
Andre de Bortnowsky, City Attorney
Dated: ______
T
HE CITY OF VICTORVILLE
By:
John Preston, Risk Manager
Dated: ____________________________
19 Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
EXHIBIT A
CONTRACTOR'S BID PROPOSAL
See Attachment
EXHIBIT A
20/Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
EXHIBIT A
21/Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067
EXHIBIT A
22/Construction Contract/Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp./Project CC23-067 Item Number: 3
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 21, 2023
Submitted By:
Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water
Subject:
Environmental Programs Quarterly Report for the Second Quarter of Fiscal Year 2023 Recommendation:
That the Honorable Victorville City Council review and file.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Goal E of the Strategic Plan, Invest in Infrastructure. The Environmental Programs Division assists with creating a healthy and livable community by maintaining the City’s assets through investment in infrastructure and innovations.
Discussion:
The City of Victorville Environmental Programs Division within the Public Works Department serves both residential and commercial customers, with a staff of 15 personnel. Department staff will be providing quarterly updates as a means to present key departmental activities, pertinent highlights, and operational performance indicators.
Staff remains available for any questions the Council may have.
Attachments: A. Environmental Programs Division Quarterly Report - FY2023 Q2 Attachment A
The City of Victorville’s Environmental Programs Division is responsible for administering, coordinating, implementing, and promoting programs related to solid waste management, recycling, household hazardous waste, community cleanup, and illegal dump abatement while also administering the contract with Victorville Disposal, our franchised trash/recycling hauler. The Division also is responsible for ensuring compliance with State of California legislative mandates to recycle and reduce waste sent to landfill, including AB 939 (50% recycling mandate); AB 341 (mandatory commercial recycling); AB 1826 (mandatory commercial ORGANICS recycling); and SB 1383 (organics landfill reduction).
QUARTERLY REPORT OCT - DEC 2022
AT-A-GLANCE
RECYCLING DROP-
OFF CENTER
HOUSEHOLD
HAZARDOUS WASTE
CENTER (HHWC)
ILLEGAL DUMP
ABATEMENT
2,634
VISITORS
39 TONS OF
E-WASTE RECYCLED
531
MATTRESSES
RECYCLED
1,164
VISITORS
2,490
GALLONS OF
MOTOR OIL
158
TIRES
DROPPED OFF
756
SITES ABATED
226
MATTRESSES
COLLECTED
347
TONS TO
LANDFILL
COMMUNITY
EVENTS
ILLEGAL DUMP
ABATEMENT
SB 1383
UPDATE
PROGRAM
SPOTLIGHT
Every April and October, we organize a citywide Community Cleanup Day. Between 600-1,200 volunteers turn out for each event, collecting litter and debris from roadsides.
Volunteers are provided with trash bags, gloves, litter pickup sticks, water, and t-shirts while the City disposes of the collected trash. Volunteers also receive coupons for lunch discounts at a variety of participating local restaurants. More information on signing up for our Cleanup events can be found by visiting Victorvilleca.gov/CCU.
From our October 22, 2022, event:
# of Volunteers 625
# of Tons of Litter Collected 12
We sponsor an Adopt-A-Street Program to promote a cleaner community and provide a year-round volunteer opportunity for concerned residents. Adopt-A-Street volunteers agree to pick up litter along their “adopted” stretch of road at least four times per year.
Adopt-A-Street volunteers are provided gloves, litter sticks, and trash bags to collect the trash, which is then removed by our staff. The City also posts a “This Street Adopted By” street sign with the name of the individual or group that adopted the street. More information on how to become a volunteer, please visit Victorvilleca.gov/AdoptAStreet.
Cleanup performed October through December:
Adopt-A-Street Groups 34
Bags of Litter collected 126
# of Family groups participating 11
# of Organizations participating 26
12/07/22 - Locust & Bear Valley Rd 12/01/22 - 7th & Lincoln Drive 12/06/22 - Valley Center vacant lot Our crews provide support to the Code Enforcement Department as needed. Once a Code Enforcement Officer has posted the site and it has been vacated and authorized for abatement, our crews come in to clear the location of trash and debris. This task has continually grown in volume and takes more time as our homeless population has increased throughout the years to become a daily task for all crews. The most common items removed include clothing and electronics.
From October through December:
Homeless Encampments abated 222
Despite the many programs offered to reduce illegal dumping, there are still individuals that choose to illegally dump debris on vacant lots, roadsides, and in alley ways. These dumps are not only illegal, but they are also unsightly and bring a potential hazard to our community, including vehicles traveling our roads and to the environment. Division workers routinely monitor these areas using a variety of equipment to remove and clean up the debris.
Items removed between October and December included:
Total tons collected 100
Mattresses collected 226
Sofas collected 184
Tires collected 789
Sites abated 756
Total tons collected 347
S
ervices requests completed 538
Recycling Hotline: (760) 955- 8615 Service Calls (760) 241- 6365 Administration (760) 955- 5200 City of Victorville
Public Works Department – Environmental Programs Division VictorvilleCA.gov/DumpItRightVV
California’s Short-Lived Climate Pollutants Strategy, commonly referred to as SB 1383, passed in 2016 and went into effect on January 1, 2022. Commercial organics recycling programs for food scraps, garden trimmings, and wood waste have already been implemented in the City. Our residential program will launch citywide in mid 2023, with all residents receiving green cans to properly dispose of their garden trimmings, wood scraps, food waste and leftover food scraps.
We launched a pilot program that went live with 641 homes receiving Organics cans on September 24th, with their first official service date on October 5th. The feedback and information received from this pilot program will greatly assist us when we deploy citywide.
Throughout the year, we sponsor events to assist our residents with cleanup and large projects that fall outside of their normal routine; such as events like ShredFest, Free Dump Day and Community Cleanup. Our next quarter will include two of these events; ShredFest will be held on Saturday, February 4th and our Free Dump Day will be held on Saturday, March 11th. Details on all our City Cleanup programs can be found online at Victorvilleca.gov/DumpItRightVV.
Community Cleanup April 22nd & October 21st
Free Dump Days March 11th, July 22nd, November 18th
ShredFest & Compost Giveaway February 4th, May 6th, August 5th & October 4th Victorville Recycles Week TBD
Item Number: 4
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 21, 2023
Submitted By:
Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water
Subject:
Public Works O&M Statistics for the Second Quarter of Fiscal Year 2023 Recommendation:
That the Honorable Victorville City Council review and file.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Goal E of the Strategic Plan, Invest in Infrastructure. The various divisions of Public Works assist with creating a healthy and livable community by maintaining the City’s assets through investment in infrastructure and innovations.
Discussion:
The City of Victorville Public Works Department serves both residential and commercial customers, with a staff of 101 personnel. Department staff will be providing quarterly updates as a means to present key departmental activities, pertinent highlights, and operational performance indicators.
Staff remains available for any questions the Council may have.
Attachments: A. Public Works FY2023 Q2 Quarterly Update Attachment A
Q2 FY 22/23: October 1, 2022 to December 31,2022
QUARTERLY O&M STATISTICS
CITY OF VICTORVILLE – PUBLIC WORKS
Asphalt
2,778 - Potholes repaired
63,820 - Cracks sealed (linear feet)
Concrete
42 - Cubic yards poured
15 - Locations repaired
Graffiti
69,049 - Graffiti sq ft covered
608 - # of Graffiti locations
68 - Gallons of paint used
Right-of-Way
198 - Catch basins cleaned
23 - Drainage channels cleaned
13 - Shoulders graded (miles)
Fleet System Inspections
118 - Emissions System
51 - Safety Inspection
137 - Oil/Filter Change
38 - CAL “BIT” Compliance
16 - Transmission Service
367 - Work Orders completed
Fleet Vehicle Repair
64 - AC/Heater repairs
271 - Brakes and Tires replaced
144 - Electrical Systems repaired
828 - Work Orders completed
Assessment Districts
(City crews)
9 - Irrigation leak repairs
2 - Miles trimmed
7 - Service requests Sewer Mains
37 - Cleaned (miles)
8 - Camera inspected (miles)
7 - Sewer lateral repair projects
Street Sweeping
539 - Debris collected (tons)
145 - Debris recycled (tons)
4,242 - Miles swept
Signals & Street
Lighting
27 - Signals repaired
119 - Signals maintained
32 - Street lights repaired
Signage & Striping
32 - Gallons of paint used
1 - Miles of striping
633 - Signs maintained
179 - Signs fabricated
Q2 FY 22/23
It is the mission of the Public Works Department to be an integral part of our community by improving the quality of life by maintaining the City’s infrastructure. This is accomplished through a team of 116 dedicated public works professionals who provide superior customer assistance with timely, efficient, and effective delivery of public services. These core elements reflect the Department's ongoing commitment to preserving and enhancing the quality of life in the City of Victorville. This professional staff is led by the Director of Public Works and Water, two Assistant Directors, four Managers, and an administrative staff to organize the delivery of these services. Below are brief descriptions of each division to help you understand their functions.
Fleet Division (19 Employees)
The Fleet Division is responsible for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of City vehicles and heavy equipment assigned to the City’s Fleet Division, including Fire Department apparatus and equipment, in addition to the Police Department’s vehicles and equipment. Over 900 vehicles and equipment are maintained using preventative maintenance schedules to extend the life of the vehicles and equipment and to improve performance and safety levels. Additionally, they maintain two Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) stations, used by City vehicles and available for public use, located at D Street and McArt Road. Annually, approximately 5,000 work orders are generated requiring over 15,000 labor hours to complete.
Street Maintenance Division (28 employees)
The Street Maintenance Division provides maintenance and repair of over 400 miles of paved roads with asphalt repairs including pothole repairing and crack sealing; concrete repairs including installing and repairing of sidewalks, curb & gutters, and handicap ramps; and cleaning of bus shelters, weed abatement and graffiti removal throughout the City. Additionally, this Division is responsible for the maintenance and repair of City dedicated open spaces including the Veteran’s Memorial, the Riverwalk, and the Seventh Street islands.
Traffic Maintenance Division (13 employees)
The Traffic Maintenance Division is responsible for the preventative maintenance and repair of 95 signalized intersections, including approximately 1,500 signal heads, throughout the City. In addition, this division also maintains public street markings like directional arrows and STOP bars in the streets, lane striping, crosswalk and curb painting, and the repairing and maintenance of delineators and other traffic control devices.
Right of Way Division (10 employees)
The Right of Way (ROW) Division is responsible for the maintenance and grading of approximately 370 miles of shoulders within the City right of way areas that do not currently have curbs and gutters by addressing roughly 65 miles annually, or as needed. Additionally, staff maintains the storm drain system with removal of sediment and debris from catch basins and channels across 68 miles of mainline. Daily street sweeping is performed to address approximately 700 miles annually, collecting up to 2,000 tons of debris.
CITY OF VICTORVILLE – PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Assessment District Division (3 employees)
The assessment districts consist of 13 unique areas with special benefit improvements pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 of the California Streets and Highways Code. These districts are split in 3 sections with the landscaping maintenance assessment (LMAD) responsible for 8 districts requiring landscape maintenance, the drainage facility assessment (DFAD) responsible for 3 districts requiring storm water management maintenance, and the community-funded parks maintenance assessment (MAD) responsible for 2 districts providing repairs and maintenance as needed. Maintenance performed within these districts include shrubbery and trees, irrigation systems, and perimeter walls and curbing across over 4 million square feet of area combined. To address the varying seasonal fluctuations across the district, this division also administers a contract that supplements the needs of all 13 assessment districts.
Sanitary Division (14 employees)
The Sanitary Division is responsible for the maintenance of the sanitary sewer collection system. This system has approximately 430 miles of sewer mainline and over 27,000 service connections. Daily tasks include flushing the sanitary sewer mainline and laterals, camera inspection of the sewer system, and responding to sanitary overflows to provide clean up and documentation.
Environment Programs Division (15 Employees)
The Environmental Programs Division provides for solid waste and recycling services by administering contracts for solid waste and recycling collection, solid waste disposal, recycling processing, organic material processing, household hazardous waste center staffing, and household hazardous waste disposal. Additionally, this division ensures the City’s compliance with State recycling mandates, including AB 939 (50% recycling), AB 341 and AB 1826 (Mandatory Commercial Recycling and Organics Recycling), and SB 1383 (Mandatory Organics Recycling).
The Division is also responsible for educating the public, businesses, multi-family housing complexes, and schools regarding recycling, organics recycling, backyard composting, household hazardous waste, #DumpItRightVV programs, and other cleanup programs in Victorville by staffing outreach/education booths at public events including the Fall Festival, Spring Egg Hunt, the Home and Garden Show at the Fairgrounds and other community events. Division staff assists Billing and Customer Service Divisions with field research, vacancy checks, and property owner verifications while also monitoring and checking all properties to ensure that all occupied premises in the City are signed up for solid waste/recycling service. The Illegal Dump Cleanup crew responds to reports of illegal dumping and proactively patrols areas known for illegal dumping while also cleaning up abandoned homeless encampments and boarding up vacant/nuisance buildings in response to requests from Code Enforcement Department. This Division also administers the Adopt-A-Street and Community Clean-Up Day programs.
Revised October 2022
Graffiti Hotline: (760) 261- 2222 Service Calls (760) 241- 6365 Administration (760) 955- 5200 City of Victorville
Public Works Department
VictorvilleCA.gov/PublicWorks
Item Number: 5
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 21, 2023
Submitted By:
John Mendiola, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15 in the amount of $14,473,918.61, covering Electronic Fund Transfers No. 333279 through 333528 and Warrant No. 788868 through 789104 for 01/20/2023 through 02/02/2023 and Wire Transfer dated 01/23/2023, per the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 for the period covering July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023.
Fiscal Impact:
The total fiscal impact for FY22-23 in the amount of $14,473,918.61 is authorized with this action. The attached report details the total funds paid to vendors.
Background:
Pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code (2.24.080) the attached demands were presented by the departments, audited by the Finance Department and subsequent warrants/wire transfers were issued. All were found to be in conformity to City policies and procedures and funds were budgeted or available to pay said demands. List of commercial warrants and wire transfers are now being presented to Council for approval.
Attachments: A. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15 Check Register Summary ATTACHMENT A:
Commercial Demand Schedule No. 15 Check Register Summary
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/02/2023 07:41 Page 1User:
Program ID:
emesa
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
333279 01/25/2023 EFT 014848 DOMINGUEZ, MIGUEL 204.38
333280 01/25/2023 EFT 014638 ACCURATE OVERHEAD DOOR SY 3,689.69 333281 01/25/2023 EFT 014305 ALBERT A .WEBB ASSOCIATES 3,531.50 333282 01/25/2023 EFT 000104 DANTIN ENTERPRISES, INC. 795.00 333283 01/25/2023 EFT 001646 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT 2,556.28 333284 01/25/2023 EFT 002921 AMERICAN LANDSCAPE AND MA 50,462.64 333285 01/25/2023 EFT 018562 BEST POWER EQUIPMENT, LLC 292.64 333286 01/25/2023 EFT 000205 ATLAS COPCO USA HOLDINGS 1,974.24 333287 01/25/2023 EFT 000297 BECK OIL, INC. 24,394.79
333288 01/25/2023 EFT 015877 BOOT BARN, INC. 2,318.99
333289 01/25/2023 EFT 010986 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNN 25,520.78 333290 01/25/2023 EFT 003245 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 392.00 333291 01/25/2023 EFT 000857 CALIFORNIA SURVEYING & DR 15,130.90 333292 01/25/2023 EFT 014820 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS 404.62 333294 01/25/2023 EFT 016335 CHARTER COMMUNICATION HOL 2,375.00 333295 01/25/2023 EFT 015486 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL D 413.68 333296 01/25/2023 EFT 000662 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTER 1,325.00 333297 01/25/2023 EFT 000677 CRAFCO, INC. 33,572.01
333298 01/25/2023 EFT 007554 DAVIS, JOSHUA 225.00
333299 01/25/2023 EFT 022345 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SER 582.19 333300 01/25/2023 EFT 015760 FASTENAL COMPANY 349.80
333301 01/25/2023 EFT 017560 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 16,331.86 333302 01/25/2023 EFT 016767 KALMIKOV ENTERPRISES, INC 153.98 333303 01/25/2023 EFT 016263 AFECO, INC 390.19
333304 01/25/2023 EFT 011206 FLYERS ENERGY LLC 750.33
333305 01/25/2023 EFT 015874 FRIENDS OF THE VICTORVILL 1,038.61 333306 01/25/2023 EFT 016134 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS C 509.13 333307 01/25/2023 EFT 001740 G.A. OSBORNE PIPE-SUPPLY 1,415.86 333308 01/25/2023 EFT 016026 GEYSER EQUIPMENT, LLC 230.00 333309 01/25/2023 EFT 001063 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 927.39 333310 01/25/2023 EFT 001076 GRAINGER 948.39
333311 01/25/2023 EFT 016317 GREATER HOPE FOUNDATION F 200.00 333312 01/25/2023 EFT 006269 GREEN, DE BORTNOWSKY, LLP 70,557.20 333313 01/25/2023 EFT 001104 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 1,081.62 333314 01/25/2023 EFT 018751 HAMPTON, BRENDA 332.09
333315 01/25/2023 EFT 018938 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1,447.50 333316 01/25/2023 EFT 014969 LOS ANGELES TRUCK, LLC 110.21 333317 01/25/2023 EFT 010774 HR GREEN PACIFIC, INC. 54,606.25 333318 01/25/2023 EFT 021594 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 4,120.00 333319 01/25/2023 EFT 018048 INDUSTRIAL CLERICAL RECRU 5,107.12 333320 01/25/2023 EFT 024922 INFOSEND, INC 3,587.16
333321 01/25/2023 EFT 001059 JOE A. GONSALVES & SON 3,000.00 333322 01/25/2023 EFT 018401 JOHNSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1,120.19 333323 01/25/2023 EFT 020477 LIFE-ASSIST, INC. 933.19
333324 01/25/2023 EFT 019967 MOJAVE AUTO COLLISION 11,175.78 333325 01/25/2023 EFT 017743 PULICE, SAMUEL A. 245.59
333326 01/25/2023 EFT 001627 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQU 164.27 333327 01/25/2023 EFT 018621 NTTAMERICA SOUTIONS, INC 3,391.83 333329 01/25/2023 EFT 015663 PADILLA & ASSOCIATES, INC 5,638.90 333330 01/25/2023 EFT 013165 PETE'S ROAD SERVICE 6,256.62 333331 01/25/2023 EFT 001886 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 766.40 333332 01/25/2023 EFT 000319 R&R INDUSTRIES, INC. 1,205.14
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/02/2023 07:41 Page 2User:
Program ID:
emesa
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
333333 01/25/2023 EFT 013661 REBEL OIL COMPANY 32,286.15 333334 01/25/2023 EFT 020941 REWARD STRATEGY GROUP, IN 11,100.00 333335 01/25/2023 EFT 001987 ROTARY CLUB - VICTORVILLE 161.67 333336 01/25/2023 EFT 002063 SBC FIRE DEPARTMENT 39,059.59 333337 01/25/2023 EFT 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 2,661,531.64 333338 01/25/2023 EFT 015670 SCORPION FIRE PROTECTION, 7,087.50 333339 01/25/2023 EFT 002123 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY 1,496.78 333340 01/25/2023 EFT 021434 SOUTH COAST, LLC 76.93
333341 01/25/2023 EFT 001153 DS SERVICES OF AMERICA, I 143.81 333342 01/25/2023 EFT 018883 MOMAR, INC. 535.05
333343 01/25/2023 EFT 021414 CALAMP WIRELESS NETWORKS 460.00 333344 01/25/2023 EFT 018368 TARGETSOLUTIONS LEARNING, 384.00 333345 01/25/2023 EFT 017269 TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE INC 783.71 333346 01/25/2023 EFT 001169 AUTO PARTS DIRECT LLC 130.33 333347 01/25/2023 EFT 002419 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 853.15 333348 01/25/2023 EFT 029118 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPO 3,676.54 333349 01/25/2023 EFT 014536 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF C 1,607.35 333350 01/25/2023 EFT 000095 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC. 9,572.25 333351 01/25/2023 EFT 027706 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAIN 2,301.71 333352 01/25/2023 EFT 027303 VACANT PROPERTY SECURITY, 532.88 333353 01/25/2023 EFT 013356 VALLEYWIDE NEWSPAPERS LLC 56.00 333354 01/25/2023 EFT 015079 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES 2,595.16 333355 01/25/2023 EFT 020762 OREMOR OF VICTORVILLE, LL 111.85 333356 01/25/2023 EFT 002481 VICTOR VALLEY ANIMAL PROT 23,818.08 333357 01/25/2023 EFT 002862 V.V. TOW, INC. 39.00
333358 01/25/2023 EFT 002498 VICTOR VALLEY WASTEWATER 17,900.01 333359 01/25/2023 EFT 002554 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3,386.84 333360 01/25/2023 EFT 005698 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC. 12,269.04 333361 01/25/2023 EFT 000208 WESTERN ELECTRICITY COORD 125.00 333362 01/25/2023 EFT 022033 WOODARD & CURRAN, INC. 138,750.00 333363 01/25/2023 EFT 018845 Z GLOBAL INC. 265,707.41
333364 01/25/2023 EFT 014212 ALDERETE, EVONIA 367.17
333365 01/25/2023 EFT 011930 ANDERSON, PAMELA K 353.71
333366 01/25/2023 EFT 019717 ARROYO, JOANN 185.31
333367 01/25/2023 EFT 022271 ASHTON, STEVE 967.14
333368 01/25/2023 EFT 004941 BATES, CAROLEE 546.09
333369 01/25/2023 EFT 003638 BECERRA, ELIZABETH 669.62
333370 01/25/2023 EFT 012054 BECKER, JOHN R 212.62
333371 01/25/2023 EFT 014654 BEVILACQUA, ANTHONY 847.15 333372 01/25/2023 EFT 011916 BIER, MICHAEL 334.35
333373 01/25/2023 EFT 018689 BORROWMAN, STEVEN H. 670.95 333374 01/25/2023 EFT 012066 BROWN, MARTY R 367.17
333375 01/25/2023 EFT 012044 BURCHAK, GLORIA J 330.83
333376 01/25/2023 EFT 012056 CALDWELL, TERRY E 212.62
333377 01/25/2023 EFT 001114 CAMELI-STEVENS, LORAINE 135.41 333378 01/25/2023 EFT 003218 CARBAJAL, STEVEN 649.10
333379 01/25/2023 EFT 025314 CASTRO, MELISSA 701.79
333380 01/25/2023 EFT 003645 CATHCART, MICHAEL 547.89
333381 01/25/2023 EFT 008111 COLLINS, KEVIN 457.43
333382 01/25/2023 EFT 011935 COSTELLO, JOSE 87.54
333383 01/25/2023 EFT 011934 COX, JAMES L 295.12
333384 01/25/2023 EFT 012064 COY, MICHAEL 107.62
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/02/2023 07:41 Page 3User:
Program ID:
emesa
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
333385 01/25/2023 EFT 012069 DEZWART, AMY LYN 330.83
333386 01/25/2023 EFT 006095 DIAZ, JANET 454.91
333387 01/25/2023 EFT 019734 DORAN, WILLIAM J. III 287.34 333388 01/25/2023 EFT 009544 FALZONE, RICHARD 204.48
333389 01/25/2023 EFT 012046 FITZSIMMONS, RALPH L 52.16 333390 01/25/2023 EFT 012062 FLORES, CYNTHIA D 479.02
333391 01/25/2023 EFT 004773 FLORES, JOSEPH P. 9.57
333392 01/25/2023 EFT 011940 GARCIA, VINCENT J 649.75
333393 01/25/2023 EFT 011909 GARLAND, SHEILA D 174.78
333394 01/25/2023 EFT 012063 HARBOUR, RAYMOND LEE 822.47 333395 01/25/2023 EFT 015665 HELDRETH, GREGORY 847.15
333396 01/25/2023 EFT 012052 HINOJOS, JANICE A 246.83
333397 01/25/2023 EFT 011677 HOLLAND, KELLEY 252.42
333398 01/25/2023 EFT 012050 JARRETT, JENNIE L 330.83
333399 01/25/2023 EFT 022215 KARRES, RONALD J. 265.73
333400 01/25/2023 EFT 012049 KUHLMANN, EULEMA 96.99
333401 01/25/2023 EFT 029000 LACEY, MICHAEL P. 289.91
333402 01/25/2023 EFT 014183 LAURIE, BERNEE 162.74
333403 01/25/2023 EFT 012061 LAWSON, JAMES 529.31
333404 01/25/2023 EFT 012047 LEEF, DAVID 212.62
333405 01/25/2023 EFT 009048 LUDWIG, TRACY 499.67
333406 01/25/2023 EFT 019051 LUTHER, KARLA 252.42
333407 01/25/2023 EFT 012060 MADDOX, JONNIE F 367.17
333408 01/25/2023 EFT 011919 MARTINEZ, BASILIO 847.15
333409 01/25/2023 EFT 019440 MCCORMICK, DONNA 688.33
333410 01/25/2023 EFT 014184 MCGINN, JOHN 565.07
333411 01/25/2023 EFT 011918 MCGLADE, JOHN A 206.19
333412 01/25/2023 EFT 004588 MCGOWAN, CHERYL 216.94
333413 01/25/2023 EFT 003603 MCMURTRY, DANIEL 643.05
333414 01/25/2023 EFT 011913 MILLENDER, FRANCENE J 513.13 333415 01/25/2023 EFT 004745 MILLER, BRUCE 88.78
333416 01/25/2023 EFT 011917 MORSE, RENEE 353.71
333417 01/25/2023 EFT 012070 MOSHER, ADELE 85.11
333418 01/25/2023 EFT 012426 MULLINS, DENNIS M. 222.65
333419 01/25/2023 EFT 012065 NEWELL, CAROLYN 787.19
333420 01/25/2023 EFT 003200 O'DELL, DARRELL 530.51
333421 01/25/2023 EFT 013672 OGILVIE-HARPER, MARQUITA 242.63 333422 01/25/2023 EFT 012697 OROS, DWAYNE E. 701.79
333423 01/25/2023 EFT 012057 PATTERSON, ADAIR MARIE 353.71 333424 01/25/2023 EFT 011914 PETERSON, ROGER 147.73
333425 01/25/2023 EFT 022185 PIEPER, WADE 701.79
333426 01/25/2023 EFT 020717 PRUEITT, CORINNE 707.51
333427 01/25/2023 EFT 020716 PRUEITT, DAVID 707.51
333428 01/25/2023 EFT 011910 RAMIREZ, DIANA M 20.37
333429 01/25/2023 EFT 018894 RANDALL, DAVID L. 547.24
333430 01/25/2023 EFT 011920 RANKIN, SHARON 267.81
333431 01/25/2023 EFT 013209 RANKIN, TIMOTHY 571.03
333432 01/25/2023 EFT 020907 RODRIGUEZ, ANGELA 265.73
333433 01/25/2023 EFT 014496 RODRIGUEZ, LOUIE 643.05
333434 01/25/2023 EFT 017345 RUSSO, MARILEE 383.69
333435 01/25/2023 EFT 003583 RUSSO, VINCE 550.10
333436 01/25/2023 EFT 014493 SALAS, GLENN 266.06
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/02/2023 07:41 Page 4User:
Program ID:
emesa
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
333437 01/25/2023 EFT 012045 SALBERG, RAYMOND A 237.99
333438 01/25/2023 EFT 011929 SALINAS SR., XAVIER S 174.78 333439 01/25/2023 EFT 017488 SCHROEDER, KAY D. 295.12
333440 01/25/2023 EFT 014082 SMITH, ARNOLD 88.78
333441 01/25/2023 EFT 011931 SONGER FAMILY SURVIVAL TR 367.17 333442 01/25/2023 EFT 024654 SPARKS, DAVID J. 665.56
333443 01/25/2023 EFT 005559 ST. LOUIS, LINDA 847.15
333444 01/25/2023 EFT 018887 STONESIFER, ROBERT 96.99
333445 01/25/2023 EFT 021852 STONESIFER, BARRY 701.79
333446 01/25/2023 EFT 012949 STRATTON, DANIEL 159.59
333447 01/25/2023 EFT 017153 SZARZYNSKI, MICHAEL J. 441.57 333448 01/25/2023 EFT 021025 TAYLOR, SHARON 649.75
333449 01/25/2023 EFT 012078 THOMASSON, PHILLIP 488.97
333450 01/25/2023 EFT 014806 WASSERMAN, REBECCA A 75.85 333451 01/25/2023 EFT 019160 WEAVER, STUART 701.79
333452 01/25/2023 EFT 013671 WEBB, WILLIAM C 344.46
333453 01/25/2023 EFT 011915 WHITE, JAMES M 367.17
333454 01/25/2023 EFT 011924 WILSON, BOBBY G 214.01
333455 01/25/2023 EFT 012048 WILSON, HELEN E 460.44
333456 01/25/2023 EFT 012958 WOLTERS, MARCELLA 420.01
333457 01/25/2023 EFT 012059 ZIZZI, WARREN J 632.64
333458 02/01/2023 EFT 002201 AAAE 330.00
333459 02/01/2023 EFT 019621 AGA ENGINEERS, INC. 11,501.72 333460 02/01/2023 EFT 010826 AIR EXPRESSWAY TOWING, IN 65.00 333461 02/01/2023 EFT 000104 DANTIN ENTERPRISES, INC. 1,900.00 333462 02/01/2023 EFT 014085 ANGELES CONTRACTOR, INC 1,780,069.19 333463 02/01/2023 EFT 000165 ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC 90.00 333464 02/01/2023 EFT 018562 BEST POWER EQUIPMENT, LLC 508.54 333465 02/01/2023 EFT 014614 AUTOMATED GATE SERVICES, 420.38 333466 02/01/2023 EFT 010828 AVID IDENTIFICATION SYSTE 1,338.67 333467 02/01/2023 EFT 007650 BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 471.45 333468 02/01/2023 EFT 003638 BECERRA, ELIZABETH 57.12
333469 02/01/2023 EFT 000297 BECK OIL, INC. 8,180.02
333470 02/01/2023 EFT 015877 BOOT BARN, INC. 717.45
333471 02/01/2023 EFT 003245 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 1,330.00 333472 02/01/2023 EFT 002720 CALIFORNIA TOOL & WELDING 290.84 333473 02/01/2023 EFT 028287 CASTELLON, STEPHANIE 75.00 333474 02/01/2023 EFT 015486 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL D 3,877.37 333475 02/01/2023 EFT 000743 DELL MARKETING L.P. 1,049.05 333476 02/01/2023 EFT 012505 DESERT ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 1,892.00 333477 02/01/2023 EFT 022345 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SER 109.29 333478 02/01/2023 EFT 005295 DOKKEN ENGINEERING 2,432.97 333479 02/01/2023 EFT 028115 D'S BOOTERY 675.00
333480 02/01/2023 EFT 008049 ENVISIONWARE, INC. 110,792.71 333481 02/01/2023 EFT 001829 FINDAWAY WORLD, LLC 1,971.85 333482 02/01/2023 EFT 011206 FLYERS ENERGY LLC 1,316.72 333483 02/01/2023 EFT 016134 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS C 9,441.66 333484 02/01/2023 EFT 003960 CENGAGE LEARNING, INC. 352.85 333485 02/01/2023 EFT 001740 G.A. OSBORNE PIPE-SUPPLY 131.97 333486 02/01/2023 EFT 001063 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 566.31 333487 02/01/2023 EFT 001076 GRAINGER 545.07
333488 02/01/2023 EFT 003047 GRAVES & KING LLP 1,069.82
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/02/2023 07:41 Page 5User:
Program ID:
emesa
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
333489 02/01/2023 EFT 016317 GREATER HOPE FOUNDATION F 250.00 333490 02/01/2023 EFT 021387 GREEN, KYNUNULA 234.00
333491 02/01/2023 EFT 017752 HATTRIX INC. 421.95
333492 02/01/2023 EFT 028225 HESPERIA OUTDOOR POWER EQ 748.21 333493 02/01/2023 EFT 000278 HI DESERT ALARM 535.88
333494 02/01/2023 EFT 021594 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 1,440.01 333495 02/01/2023 EFT 018048 INDUSTRIAL CLERICAL RECRU 749.76 333496 02/01/2023 EFT 024922 INFOSEND, INC 12,948.51
333497 02/01/2023 EFT 001282 INLAND KENWORTH, INC. 1,061.07 333498 02/01/2023 EFT 016775 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROU 275.00 333499 02/01/2023 EFT 001059 JOE A. GONSALVES & SON 12,000.00 333500 02/01/2023 EFT 004986 LESLIE'S SWIMMING POOL SU 37.67 333501 02/01/2023 EFT 001599 MOJAVE DESERT AQMD 3,112.62 333502 02/01/2023 EFT 028462 NINYO & MOORE GEOTECHNICA 24,410.20 333503 02/01/2023 EFT 001789 PARKHOUSE TIRE, INC. 142.33 333504 02/01/2023 EFT 022232 PERMA-BOUND BOOKS 778.02
333505 02/01/2023 EFT 001886 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 1,213.98 333506 02/01/2023 EFT 016281 REA'S AUTOMOTIVE INC. 719.85 333507 02/01/2023 EFT 002017 SAFEWAY SIGN CO. 11,244.75 333508 02/01/2023 EFT 020842 ALL PURPOSE FIRE EXT. COR 307.89 333509 02/01/2023 EFT 002063 SBC FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,842.75 333510 02/01/2023 EFT 017252 SDC ENGINEERING, INC 11,406.25 333511 02/01/2023 EFT 007194 SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING 325,911.37 333512 02/01/2023 EFT 018883 MOMAR, INC. 689.89
333513 02/01/2023 EFT 018368 TARGETSOLUTIONS LEARNING, 504.33 333514 02/01/2023 EFT 017269 TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE INC 1,508.88 333515 02/01/2023 EFT 027532 TRL SYSTEMS, INC. 2,943.25 333516 02/01/2023 EFT 028349 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 20,951.25 333517 02/01/2023 EFT 001169 AUTO PARTS DIRECT LLC 110.81 333518 02/01/2023 EFT 014536 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF C 2,678.72 333519 02/01/2023 EFT 027706 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAIN 481.03 333520 02/01/2023 EFT 013356 VALLEYWIDE NEWSPAPERS LLC 757.50 333521 02/01/2023 EFT 002862 V.V. TOW, INC. 39.00
333522 02/01/2023 EFT 002498 VICTOR VALLEY WASTEWATER 2,099,571.65 333523 02/01/2023 EFT 017120 WASHINGTON, DYJUAN 107.00
333524 02/01/2023 EFT 002554 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 260.30 333525 02/01/2023 EFT 018301 WESTERN WATER WORKS SUPPL 1,109.68 333526 02/01/2023 EFT 021844 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICE 48,479.97 333527 02/01/2023 EFT 009637 WSP USA, INC. 2,090.50
333528 02/01/2023 EFT 018845 Z GLOBAL INC. 201,615.56
788868 01/25/2023 PRINTED 016218 2 HOT UNIFORMS INC 15.23 788869 01/25/2023 PRINTED 015507 UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERV 52,963.68 788870 01/25/2023 PRINTED 999974 BAILEY, YOLANDA 200.00 788871 01/25/2023 PRINTED 999974 BENNETT, BREANNA 60.00 788872 01/25/2023 PRINTED 020713 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 5,000.00 788873 01/25/2023 PRINTED 025164 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON T 4,486.30 788874 01/25/2023 PRINTED 000290 BATTERY MART OF APPLE VAL 205.94 788875 01/25/2023 PRINTED 017050 BLAS, CASEY 107.00
788876 01/25/2023 PRINTED 017353 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 1,342.93 788877 01/25/2023 PRINTED 000380 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES 330.96 788878 01/25/2023 PRINTED 000380 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES 2,057.00 788879 01/25/2023 PRINTED 014004 CALIFORNIA WATER EFFICIEN 4,898.50
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/02/2023 07:41 Page 6User:
Program ID:
emesa
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
788880 01/25/2023 PRINTED 012732 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 656.48 788881 01/25/2023 PRINTED 020755 MIKE CAPOSIO BUICK GMC, L 473.61 788882 01/25/2023 PRINTED 000618 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 1,420.93 788883 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021079 CIVICPLUS, LLC 1,350.00 788884 01/25/2023 PRINTED 014359 CIVILTEC ENGINEERING, INC 1,541.58 788885 01/25/2023 PRINTED 019431 CONSTANT AND ASSOCIATES, 12,906.00 788886 01/25/2023 PRINTED 006331 DELAFIELD CORP 3,145.39 788887 01/25/2023 PRINTED 014574 DEMARA, FRANCISCO 16.37 788888 01/25/2023 PRINTED 018020 DIXON PEST CONTROL, INC. 492.41 788889 01/25/2023 PRINTED 018833 ESTRADA JR., FRANCISCO 225.00 788890 01/25/2023 PRINTED 000330 ET WATER SYSTEMS INC. 34,416.00 788891 01/25/2023 PRINTED 013384 LASTAND, INC. 145.00
788892 01/25/2023 PRINTED 004581 FLEETPRIDE 752.54
788894 01/25/2023 PRINTED 016787 FRANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC 2,500.00 788895 01/25/2023 PRINTED 000975 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS, INC 495.73 788896 01/25/2023 PRINTED 011371 GARDA CL NORTHWEST, INC. 5,746.86 788897 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021440 GATEHOUSE MEDIA CALIFORNI 867.52 788898 01/25/2023 PRINTED 001074 GRAHAM EQUIPMENT 348.00 788899 01/25/2023 PRINTED 020022 THE GREATER HIGH DESERT C 950.00 788900 01/25/2023 PRINTED 017053 HIGH DESERT LOCK & SAFE, 75.69 788901 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021441 HENRY SCHEIN, INC. 777.45 788902 01/25/2023 PRINTED 001155 HESPERIA HOSE SUPPLY 247.05 788903 01/25/2023 PRINTED 004021 HIGH DESERT LASER GRAPHIC 91.89 788904 01/25/2023 PRINTED 001285 INLAND WATER WORKS SUPPLY 1,686.71 788905 01/25/2023 PRINTED 010893 JAGGLI, DUSTIN 190.00
788906 01/25/2023 PRINTED 020985 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLO 278.71 788907 01/25/2023 PRINTED 000811 KB HOMES 1,976.94
788908 01/25/2023 PRINTED 018875 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS S 31.95 788909 01/25/2023 PRINTED 007233 KOVATCH MOBILE EQUIPMENT 402.18 788910 01/25/2023 PRINTED 999984 LUCKETT, CECILIA 60.00 788911 01/25/2023 PRINTED 020513 LDV INC. 397,957.00
788912 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021626 LFG PRINTING & ADVERTISIN 9,162.81 788913 01/25/2023 PRINTED 015232 LOGICALIS, INC 440.00
788914 01/25/2023 PRINTED 010660 LOVELAND'S AUTOMOTIVE SER 609.28 788915 01/25/2023 PRINTED 999985 MERRIWEATHER, DESHAUN 300.00 788916 01/25/2023 PRINTED 999985 MEZA, SANDY 125.00
788917 01/25/2023 PRINTED 000361 MARK BROWN & ASSOCIATES, 125.00 788918 01/25/2023 PRINTED 010895 MCKESSON MEDICAL SURGICAL 115.53 788919 01/25/2023 PRINTED 015830 MDG ASSOCIATES, INC 62.25 788920 01/25/2023 PRINTED 019791 MIGUEL, NATHANIEL 335.65 788921 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021161 CAR WASH PARTNERS, INC. 42.00 788922 01/25/2023 PRINTED 001595 MOJAVE BASIN AREA WATERMA 29,797.05 788923 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021760 MOLINAR, ANDREW 120.00 788924 01/25/2023 PRINTED 010501 MOORE INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE 275.24 788925 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021246 MORELAND, BRANDON 25.00 788926 01/25/2023 PRINTED 016208 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC 4,324.80 788927 01/25/2023 PRINTED 001648 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3,025.28 788928 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021150 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L 835.41 788929 01/25/2023 PRINTED 017105 ORTIZ, TIMOTHY 165.50
788930 01/25/2023 PRINTED 005800 PUMP CHECK 5,942.11
788931 01/25/2023 PRINTED 014355 QUINN COMPANY 159.72
788932 01/25/2023 PRINTED 999990 RAMIREZ, JOSIE 200.00
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/02/2023 07:41 Page 7User:
Program ID:
emesa
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
788933 01/25/2023 PRINTED 999990 RIOS, DESTINY 350.00
788934 01/25/2023 PRINTED 011466 RANGE VEHICLE CENTER INC. 132.44 788935 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021433 RIVERA, KIANA 36.00
788936 01/25/2023 PRINTED 020899 RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF CAL 260.17 788937 01/25/2023 PRINTED 999991 SALAZAR, ANNA 63.00
788938 01/25/2023 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 29.00 788939 01/25/2023 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 29.00 788940 01/25/2023 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 761.32 788941 01/25/2023 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 251.94 788942 01/25/2023 PRINTED 002071 SAN BERNARDINO CO SOLID W 305,802.80 788943 01/25/2023 PRINTED 011293 SMITH, ZYRA 183.12
788944 01/25/2023 PRINTED 016345 NNN INVESTMENTS INC. 99.50 788945 01/25/2023 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 49,388.51 788946 01/25/2023 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 20,720.82 788947 01/25/2023 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 4,728.06 788948 01/25/2023 PRINTED 019732 DUNABLE, WILLIAM F. 1,135.00 788949 01/25/2023 PRINTED 024609 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG 155.20 788950 01/25/2023 PRINTED 002236 STATE WATER RESOURCES CON 44,169.00 788951 01/25/2023 PRINTED 002236 STATE WATER RESOURCES CON 111,667.30 788952 01/25/2023 PRINTED 002269 SUNLAND FORD 3,326.00
788953 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021348 TERRONES, PAUL 158.00
788954 01/25/2023 PRINTED 014914 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPE 1,092.08 788955 01/25/2023 PRINTED 004009 THE VAN DYKE CORPORATION 574,539.23 788956 01/25/2023 PRINTED 006411 CITY OF VICTORVILLE 3,333.30 788957 01/25/2023 PRINTED 002879 VICTOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUT 55.00 788958 01/25/2023 PRINTED 029510 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 130.24 788959 01/25/2023 PRINTED 008527 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 915.68 788960 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021691 CRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 5,000.00 788961 01/25/2023 PRINTED 019735 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLAT 594,607.37 788962 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021751 55555 AMARGOSA LLC 689.88 788963 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021752 ANSARI, OMAR 14.72
788964 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021747 ARCO CONSTRUCTION 686.03 788965 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021744 ASKREN, SUSAN LORRAINE 42.91 788966 01/25/2023 PRINTED 013091 BOBERG ENGINEERING & CONT 689.88 788967 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021741 BONILLA, RENE A. 14.32 788968 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021773 BOYD, TAMARA 204.61
788969 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021748 CORREA, JACOB A. 31.38 788970 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021746 DOMINGUEZ, DORA 95.26
788971 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021740 DUCK PROPERTIES LLC 40.31 788972 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021768 ESPARZA, NADIA 10.24
788973 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021750 FARHA, ADAM ANAN 47.49 788974 01/25/2023 PRINTED 020320 FH II, LLC 689.88
788975 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021774 FULLMER CONSTRUCTION 689.88 788976 01/25/2023 PRINTED 018823 GJH DEVELOPMENT INC 689.88 788977 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021772 GRACIE SERVICING INC. 100.28 788978 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021738 HUTTON, RAYMOND LEE 99.70 788979 01/25/2023 PRINTED 015562 JACKSON, PAMELA 12.09
788980 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021736 JACOBS, RICHARD P 121.00 788981 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021745 JINDAL, NIKHIL 13.30
788982 01/25/2023 PRINTED 003067 KKTL, LLC 15.34
788983 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021356 LEE, URIEL 482.80
788984 01/25/2023 PRINTED 019724 LGI HOMES 87.09
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/02/2023 07:41 Page 8User:
Program ID:
emesa
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
788985 01/25/2023 PRINTED 019724 LGI HOMES 79.13
788986 01/25/2023 PRINTED 019724 LGI HOMES 77.09
788987 01/25/2023 PRINTED 019724 LGI HOMES 78.11
788988 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021753 LILY REAL ESTATE 46.43 788989 01/25/2023 PRINTED 015136 LONE STAR REAL ESTATE 73.57 788990 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021767 MAAS GROUP LLC 45.41
788991 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021306 MONET INVESTMENTS, LLC 25.19 788992 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021309 MUNOZ, HECTOR J. 200.94 788993 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021766 MUNOZ, PABLO 46.43
788994 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021771 NGUYEN, TUAN ANH 12.28 788995 01/25/2023 PRINTED 020891 OPENDOOR LABS INC 28.25 788996 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021043 OPENDOOR PROPERTY TRUST I 45.41 788997 01/25/2023 PRINTED 016130 PARKER INTEGRITY 283.24 788998 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021765 PROVEST REALTY INC. 78.53 788999 01/25/2023 PRINTED 019664 PULIDO, HUGO 42.91
789000 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021742 RAVIKANTHI, ARAVIND 14.32 789001 01/25/2023 PRINTED 020296 RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES 689.88 789002 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021769 RICO, ARLENE 12.28
789003 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021737 SANDOVAL, MAYRA E. 32.74 789004 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021743 SCALES, WILLIAM DAVID 52.16 789005 01/25/2023 PRINTED 017976 SONG, SHANG 12.28
789006 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021735 SPINI, PENNIE 107.18
789007 01/25/2023 PRINTED 019115 SUMMIT LEASING GROUP 45.41 789008 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021770 THE MIN LU & ZHAO YUAN DE 44.39 789009 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021739 TOSCANO, MARTIN 25.17
789010 01/25/2023 PRINTED 014473 VOONG, BENNY M 88.13
789011 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021749 WALKER, DANIEL F. II. 10.97 789012 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021755 WARD, MARK 91.48
789013 01/25/2023 PRINTED 003037 WONG, PHILIP C 118.31
789014 01/25/2023 PRINTED 008184 WONG, TAMMY W 45.41
789015 01/25/2023 PRINTED 019706 YANG, YU LAN 30.04
789016 01/25/2023 PRINTED 021754 ZUKAZA LLC 46.43
789017 01/26/2023 PRINTED 020102 CHUNG, MYUNG CHUI 96,996.80 789018 02/01/2023 PRINTED 016204 4LEAF, INC. 38,918.25
789019 02/01/2023 PRINTED 002605 AMERICAN SOCCER COMPANY, 6,657.75 789020 02/01/2023 PRINTED 017968 AVCOM SERVICES, INC. 195.00 789021 02/01/2023 PRINTED 000290 BATTERY MART OF APPLE VAL 822.23 789022 02/01/2023 PRINTED 019571 MJ AUTO GLASS INC. 461.02 789023 02/01/2023 PRINTED 019946 BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEE 111,505.79 789024 02/01/2023 PRINTED 000380 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES 33,726.25 789025 02/01/2023 PRINTED 000380 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES 4,233.21 789026 02/01/2023 PRINTED 016222 CACEO 826.00
789027 02/01/2023 PRINTED 002935 CALIFORNIA WATERSHED ENGI 10,205.25 789028 02/01/2023 PRINTED 020755 MIKE CAPOSIO BUICK GMC, L 40.89 789029 02/01/2023 PRINTED 000155 CENTURY LINK 462.52
789030 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021496 DG INVESTMENT INTERMEDIAT 16,599.96 789031 02/01/2023 PRINTED 014721 CORE & MAIN LP 3,746.22 789032 02/01/2023 PRINTED 018141 CR&R INCORPORATED 352.14 789033 02/01/2023 PRINTED 005540 CUBIC ITS, INC. 5,156.66 789034 02/01/2023 PRINTED 006348 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION 577.08 789035 02/01/2023 PRINTED 009111 APPLE VALLEY CONSTRUCTION 1,568,105.85 789036 02/01/2023 PRINTED 020623 DIVERSIFIED GLASS, INC. 11,003.00
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/02/2023 07:41 Page 9User:
Program ID:
emesa
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
789037 02/01/2023 PRINTED 018020 DIXON PEST CONTROL, INC. 413.00 789038 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021733 FOYIL, BLAKE 75.65
789039 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021440 GATEHOUSE MEDIA CALIFORNI 486.40 789040 02/01/2023 PRINTED 020022 THE GREATER HIGH DESERT C 3,500.00 789041 02/01/2023 PRINTED 020948 HARPER, JAMES JR 198.00 789042 02/01/2023 PRINTED 017053 HIGH DESERT LOCK & SAFE, 109.91 789043 02/01/2023 PRINTED 001155 HESPERIA HOSE SUPPLY 542.91 789044 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021481 VELASCO,JOSEPH 125.00
789045 02/01/2023 PRINTED 010315 HIGH DESERT HOME SHOWS 1,200.00 789046 02/01/2023 PRINTED 010315 HIGH DESERT HOME SHOWS 1,200.00 789047 02/01/2023 PRINTED 027317 INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL SERVIC 3,135.00 789048 02/01/2023 PRINTED 010893 JAGGLI, DUSTIN 194.99
789049 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021490 KIM, JEAN 80.00
789050 02/01/2023 PRINTED 004807 KONE, INC. 350.00
789051 02/01/2023 PRINTED 022774 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 2,975.00 789052 02/01/2023 PRINTED 015232 LOGICALIS, INC 12,231.09 789053 02/01/2023 PRINTED 002919 LONGORIA, STEPHAN 230.90 789054 02/01/2023 PRINTED 013784 LOPEZ, MARIO JR. 10.00 789055 02/01/2023 PRINTED 010660 LOVELAND'S AUTOMOTIVE SER 1,895.27 789056 02/01/2023 PRINTED 000361 MARK BROWN & ASSOCIATES, 230.00 789057 02/01/2023 PRINTED 001648 NAPA AUTO PARTS 96.07
789058 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021150 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L 704.18 789059 02/01/2023 PRINTED 017105 ORTIZ, TIMOTHY 800.00
789060 02/01/2023 PRINTED 999988 PENDEGRAFT VICTORVILLE 13,700.00 789061 02/01/2023 PRINTED 999988 PENDEGRAFT VICTORVILLE 12,950.00 789062 02/01/2023 PRINTED 999988 PENDEGRAFT VICTORVILLE 9,000.00 789063 02/01/2023 PRINTED 020885 CAMACHO, ERNEST M. 136,576.99 789064 02/01/2023 PRINTED 020257 PARK PLACE TECHNOLOGIES 6,750.00 789065 02/01/2023 PRINTED 018519 PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GR 186,447.87 789066 02/01/2023 PRINTED 014355 QUINN COMPANY 228.73
789067 02/01/2023 PRINTED 010689 RED HELMET TRAINING 1,440.00 789068 02/01/2023 PRINTED 018893 RICKER, JEFFERY 211.41 789069 02/01/2023 PRINTED 999991 SHIBATA, KENJI 325.00
789070 02/01/2023 PRINTED 999991 SILVA, ANTONIO 325.00
789071 02/01/2023 PRINTED 999991 STR-SDG VV1, LLC 5,000.00 789072 02/01/2023 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 761.32 789073 02/01/2023 PRINTED 018370 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 571.69 789074 02/01/2023 PRINTED 016345 NNN INVESTMENTS INC. 248.75 789075 02/01/2023 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 41,614.21 789076 02/01/2023 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 2,476.54 789077 02/01/2023 PRINTED 024609 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG 605.46 789078 02/01/2023 PRINTED 002236 STATE WATER RESOURCES CON 2,297.00 789079 02/01/2023 PRINTED 002269 SUNLAND FORD 337.40
789080 02/01/2023 PRINTED 002204 SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION 581,452.78 789081 02/01/2023 PRINTED 002298 SYSTEMS & METHODS, INC. 3,756.75 789082 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021607 T3 CONTRACTORS CORP 28,405.00 789083 02/01/2023 PRINTED 020898 UNITED ENGINEERING GROUP, 11,516.50 789084 02/01/2023 PRINTED 016520 UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND 372.72 789085 02/01/2023 PRINTED 999994 VICTORVILLE HYUNDAI MAZDA 3,750.00 789086 02/01/2023 PRINTED 010321 VICTOR VALLEY NEWS INC. 4,590.00 789087 02/01/2023 PRINTED 029510 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 255.78 789088 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021734 YU, DELONE 79.07
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
Report generated: 02/02/2023 07:41 Page 10User:
Program ID:
emesa
apchkrcn
CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared
789089 02/01/2023 PRINTED 999998 ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK 522,786.45 789090 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021789 ARANGEL, MARILYN 2,977.17 789091 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021786 BRIDGEWATER EQUIPTMENT 444.88 789092 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021787 CHICAGO TITLE CO 231.23 789093 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021784 CYRUS OPPURTUNITY ZONE FU 88.60 789094 02/01/2023 PRINTED 020298 FARINELLI, JOHN 689.88 789095 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021779 GUERRA, JOSE F 15.34
789096 02/01/2023 PRINTED 000871 OPTIMUM PROPERTY MGMT 74.59 789097 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021781 OROZCO HERNANDEZ, ROBERTO 36.98 789098 02/01/2023 PRINTED 016130 PARKER INTEGRITY 77.65 789099 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021783 POUND, PAUL M. 67.23
789100 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021785 ROBERT, MISTY 10.24
789101 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021782 VALENCIA, ESMERALDA DANIE 14.32 789102 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021788 VARGA, MIKLOS 13.30
789103 02/01/2023 PRINTED 021780 ZAVALZA, CLAUDIA 62.13 789104 02/01/2023 PRINTED 002269 SUNLAND FORD 60,273.50 484 CHECKS CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL 14,300,859.35 .00
Wires Initiated Through Wells Fargo Bank
DATE OF
WIRE ACCOUNT NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT WELLS FARGO BANK CONF # 01/23/23 Baldy Mesa Water District SR 2006 Interest DS payment on bond $ 173,059.26 FED:0125I1B7032R000896 Total: $ 173,059.26
Item Number: 6
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 21, 2023
Submitted By:
John Mendiola, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Quarterly Investment Report as of December 31, 2022
Recommendation:
That the City Council/Board of Directors receive and file the attached Quarterly Investment Report as of December 31, 2022.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. This is a report of cash and investments held by the City to be provided quarterly to the City Council/Board of Directors to receive and file.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Goal A. Financial Sustainability – Foster fiscal health through disciplined long-term planning by adhering to our three (3) investment policy criteria: safety, liquidity, and yield.
Background:
The City Treasurer is to provide the City Council/Board of Directors a quarterly report of investments, as stated in California Government Code Section 53646.
Discussion:
In accordance with the City’s Investment Policy and California Government Code Section 53646, the City Treasurer shall prepare a Quarterly Investment Report, with interim reports as may be requested by the City Council/Board of Directors or deemed as appropriate by the City Treasurer. This report shall include a management summary that provides a status of the current investment portfolios.
Below is a summary of the City’s investment performance for the last five fiscal years and the average yield of the five fiscal years. A large portion of the City’s funds are held in Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) accounts and are classified as cash since the City 2 9
8 7
can access these funds at any time. The majority of the funds held in the Trustee Accounts are reserve funds for the City’s bond issuances and are required to be held with the trustee until the bond’s final maturity date. The detail of these investments can be found in the Quarterly Investment Reports. Staff is available to answer any questions the City Council/Board of Directors may have.
Average Annual Yield Past 5 Fiscal Years & 5-Year Average
Fiscal Year:
Investment Type
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
5-Year
Avg
LAIF/Bank Accounts
(Cash) 1.24% 2.10% 1.71% 0.54% 0.34% 1.19%
Trustee Accounts
(Bond Reserve Funds) 1.37% 2.14% 0.85% 0.13% 0.48% 0.99%
Attachments: A. Quarterly Investment Report as of December 31, 2022
Item Number: 7
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 21, 2023
Submitted By:
Brian Gengler, City Engineer
Subject:
Landscape Maintenance Assessment District Full Securities Release for Tract Map No. 16720
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council approve the full release of the Landscape Maintenance Assessment District Faithful Performance and Labor & Materials Securities for Tract Map No. 16720.
Fiscal Impact:
If approved, a reimbursement of $56,311.79 will be issued from the Engineering’s Deposit Trust Account No. 600-23130. Because it is a trust account, there will be no net fiscal impact to the budgeted Engineering Department accounts.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Goal E., Strategy 1 in the Strategic Plan, “Invest in Infrastructure” and “Implement the City’s Capital Improvement Program to meet community needs.” Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, we apply the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community’s needs.
Background:
Tract Map No. 16720 (Tract 16720) is located at the southeast corner of Eucalyptus Street and Mesa Linda Street. Victorville 115-Lots, also known as Legacy Homes, is the Developer. As a condition of developing the tract map and in accordance with Victorville Municipal Code (VMC) Section 17.64.060, the Developer was required to provide securities for the required Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) Public Improvements along Eucalyptus Street.
2 9
9 0
Discussion:
At the regular City Council meeting of November 2, 2021, the City Council approved the reduction of the Faithful Performance Bond by 60 percent for the LMAD Improvements with the remaining 40 percent to be held until the plant establishment and maintenance 90-day period had ended. The 90-day maintenance period ended in December of 2021.
At that time, the Developer had completed and passed all inspections for the required LMAD improvements. An additional 20 percent was released by the City Council on February 15, 2022. Per VMC Section 17.64.070(4), the remaining 20 percent of the Faithful Performance securities are to be held for a one-year warranty period. The one- year warranty period was completed as of February 15, 2023. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council approve the full release of the LMAD Performance and Labor & Materials Securities for Tract Map No. 16720.
Staff remains available for any questions City Council may have.
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Security Tables
C. Security Deposit
Attachment A
Vicinity Map
Attachment B
Security Tables
Security Tables
Original Securities
Public Improvement Type Faithful Performance Labor & Materials Sewer $25,498.82 $12,749.42
Water $11,220 $5,610
Storm Drain $4,620 $2,310
Street $1,007,714.76 $503,857.38
LMAD $80,445.42 $40,222.71
Monumentation $39,970.13 N/A
TOTAL $1,169,469.14 $564,749.51
$1,169,469.14 + $564,749.51 = $1,734,218.65 (Cash Deposit Received)
Tract Map No.: 16720
Improvement Type: Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD)
Faithful Performance Labor & Materials
Amount of original Security: $80,445.42 $40,222.71
Amount of Security currently: $16,089.09 $40,222.71
Amount of Security being reduced: $16,089.09 $40,222.71 Amount of Security remaining: $0.00 $0.00
Developer:
Legacy Homes
1885 California St
Corona, CA 92881
Attachment C
Security Deposit
Item Number: 8
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 21, 2023
Submitted By:
Brian Gengler, City Engineer
Subject:
Acceptance of Improvements and Subdivision Improvement Release for Tract Map No. 17089
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council accept the public improvements for Tract Map No. 17089 and release the Subdivision Improvement Agreement.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Goal E., Strategy 1. in the Strategic Plan, “Invest in Infrastructure” and “Implement the City’s Capital Improvement Program to meet community needs.” Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, we apply the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community’s needs.
Background:
Tract Map No. 17089 (Tract 17089) is a 134-lot residential subdivision located at the southwest corner of Verano Street and Mesa Linda Street. Victorville 115 Lots, LP (Legacy Homes) purchased Tract 17089 in 2020. CV Communities, a Delaware LLC, had entered into a Lien Agreement with the City on January 18, 2011, as security for the completion of the required public improvements of Tract 17089. As a result of the purchase, Victorville 115 Lots, LP was required to enter into its own Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) with the City and complete the required public improvements for the tract in accordance with Victorville Municipal Code Section
17.64.060. The City Council approved the SIA with Victorville 115 Lots, LP at the November 20, 2018, City Council Meeting.
2 9
9 2
Discussion:
At the time the SIA was executed, Legacy Homes did not provide improvement bonds as they opted to complete the street improvements up front. At this time, Legacy Homes has completed tract development, and all the required street, water, sewer, and drainage improvements, therefore staff recommends that the Council accept the improvements and release the existing SIA.
Staff is available to answer any questions Council may have.
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Existing SIA
C. SIA Release
Attachment A
Vicinity Map
Attachment B
Existing SIA
Recorded in Official Records, County of San Bernardino
BOB DUTTON ASSESSOR — RECORDER — CLERK
R Regular Mail
2018- 0459117 Doc#
Titles 1
Fees
Taxes
CA SB2 Fee
Others
I I Paid
12/12/2018
8:52 AM
JC
SAN
Pages 10
0.00 0.80
0.00 0.80
$e.ee
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
ENGINEERING DEPT.
14343 Civic DR.
VICTORVILLE, CA 92392
Sect. 10, T4N, R5W, SBM
SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE
RECORDING OF THIS DOCUMENT IS FEE-EXEMPT
UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6103
No DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS DUE ON
THE DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO
REVENUE TAXATION CODE SECTION 11922
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
Tract 17089
THIS SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Victorville, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Victorville 115 Lots, LP, hereinafter referred to as "Subdivider".
City and Subdivider are sometimes hereinafter referred to individually as a "Party" and collectively referred to as the "Parties.".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Subdivider has presented to City for approval a final subdivision or parcel map (hereinafter called "Map") entitled Tract No. 17089, Recorded in Map Book 328, Pages 21, through 28, inclusive records of San Bernardino County, California; and
WHEREAS, Subdivider has requested approval of the Map prior to the construction and completion of the improvements required by the City Planning Commission, including all streets, highways or public ways and public utility facilities which are a part of, or appurtenant to, the subdivision (hereinafter called "Subdivision") designated in the Map, all in accordance with the plans and specifications for all or any of said improvements in, appurtenant to, or outside the limits of the Subdivision, which plans and specifications are now on file in the office of the City Engineer of City; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement is executed pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and Chapter 17 of the Victorville Municipal Code.
NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the approval of the Map and of the acceptance of the dedications therein offered, and in order to insure satisfactory performance by Subdivider of Subdivider's obligations under said Subdivision Map Act and said Chapter 17, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Performance of Work
Subdivider will do and perform, or cause to be done and performed, at Subdivider's own expense, in a good and workmanlike manner, and furnish all required materials, all under the direction and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of City, all of the work and improvements required by the City Planning Commission for this Subdivision in accordance with the plans and specifications on file as herein specified, or with any changes required or ordered by said Engineer, which in his opinion are necessary or required to complete the work. Any sewer work or 1 CCP:ccp
/shared/Development/PlanChecking-PermittingfTract Files/Tract 17089/Agreements/17089.SubdivisionAgreement.110618 water supply work shall be subject to the approval of the respective special districts having to do with the said types of work.
2. Work: Places and Grades to be Approved by Engineer
All of said work is to be done at the places, of the materials, in the manner, and at the grades, all as shown upon the plans and specifications therefor, heretofore approved by City Engineer and which are now on file in his office, and to the satisfaction of said City Engineer. The actual work of surveying shall be performed by the Subdivider's engineer.
3. Specifications
The work embraced herein shall be done in accordance with the provisions of the Standard Specifications of the State of California, Business and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, current edition, insofar as they may apply, and the City of Victorville Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, hereinafter referred to as the Standard Specifications. Whenever in the said State Standard Specifications the following terms are used, they shall be understood to mean the following:
a) State, Department of Transportation, City or Owner: City of Victorville, California. b) Director: The City Engineer of the City of Victorville c) Engineer: Whenever not qualified, shall mean the City Engineer of the City of Victorville, California acting either directly or through his properly authorized agents, each agent acting only within the scope of the authority delegated to him.
d) Laboratory: The laboratory to be approved by the City of Victorville to test materials and work involved in the construction provided for under this agreement.
In case of conflict between the State Standard Specifications and the Standard Specifications for Public Improvements of the City of Victorville, the Standard Specifications for Public Improvements of the City of Victorville shall prevail.
In case of conflict between the State Standard Specifications, the Standard Specifications for Public Improvements of the City of Victorville, and the plans and this agreement, the approved plans and this Agreement shall take precedence over and be used in lieu or such conflicting portions of the State Standard Specifications or Standard Specifications for Public Improvements of the City of Victorville.
4. Work: Time for Completion
City hereby fixes the time for the completion of said work to be within two years after the recording date of this agreement with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. At least two (2) calendar days prior to the commencement of work hereunder, Subdivider shall notify City Engineer of the date fixed by Subdivider for commencement thereof, so that city Engineer shall be able to provide services of inspection.
5. Time of Essence - Extension
Time is of the essence in this Agreement; provided, that in the event good cause is shown therefor, the City Council may extend the time for completion of the improvements hereunder. Any such extension may be granted without notice to the Subdivider's surety, and extensions so granted shall not relieve the surety's liability on the bond to secure the faithful performance of this agreement. The City Council shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle Subdivider to an extension. 2 CCP:ccp
/shared/Development/PlanChecking-PermittingfTract Files/Tract 17089/Agreements/17089.SubdivisionAgreement.110618
6. Repairs and Replacements
Subdivider shall replace, or have replaced, or repair, or have repaired, as the case may be, all pipes and monuments shown on the map which have been destroyed or damaged, and Subdivider shall replace or have replaced, repair, or have repaired, as the case may be, or pay to the owner, the entire cost of replacement or repairs, or any and all property damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done hereunder, whether such property be owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the State of California, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, or by the City or by any public or private corporation, or by any person whomsoever, or by any combination of such owners. Any such repair or replacement shall be to the satisfaction, and subject to the approval, of the City Engineer.
7. Permits: Compliance with Law
Subdivider shall, at Subdivider's expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction of such improvements, give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law. Subdivider agrees to procure, at his expense, any necessary permits required for the opening of any state or county roads or easements outside the jurisdiction of City.
8. Superintendence by Subdivider
Subdivider shall give personal superintendence to the work on said improvement, or have a competent foreman or superintendent, satisfactory to the City Engineer, on the work at all times during progress, with authority to act for Subdivider.
9. Inspection by City
Subdivider shall at all times maintain proper facilities, and provide safe access for inspection by City, to all parts of the work, and to the shops wherein the work is in preparation.
10. Contract Security
Concurrently with the execution hereof, Subdivider shall furnish a bond in an amount equal to at least one hundred percent of the approved Engineer's estimate as security for the faithful performance of this Agreement.
Similarly, Subdivider shall furnish a bond in an amount equal to at least fifty percent of the said price as security for the payment of all persons performing labor and furnishing materials in the construction of this tract, including any claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the State Civil Code.
The said bonds shall be in cash, letter of credit, or bonds provided by a surety satisfactory to the City, or in such other form as may be provided for by law. The said bonds shall be worded and dated to become effective immediately upon failure of the Subdivider to complete the work subject to the bonds within the two-year period allowed or any extensions thereof allowed by the City.
11. Hold-Harmless Agreement
Subdivider hereby agrees to, and shall, hold City, its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees, harmless from any liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury, including death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise from Subdivider's or Subdivider's contractors', subcontractors', agents', or employees' operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by Subdivider or by any of Subdivider's contractors, subcontractors, or by any one or more persons directly or indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for Subdivider or any of Subdivider's contractors, or subcontractors.
Subdivider agrees to, and shall defend City and its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees from any suits or actions at law or in equity for damages caused, or alleged to have been caused, by reason of any of the aforesaid operations; provided as follows:
3 CCP:ccp
/shared/Development/PlanChecking-PermittingfTract Files/Tract 17089/Agreements/17089.SubdivisionAgreement.110618 a) That the aforesaid hold-harmless agreement by Subdivider shall apply to all damages and claims for damages of every kind suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operations referred to in this Section, regardless of whether or not City has prepared, supplied or approved of, plans and/or specifications for the Subdivision, or regardless of whether or not any of the insurance policies described herein shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.
b) Acceptance by the City of the subject improvements, the deposit of certain moneys made pursuant to this Agreement by Subdivider, or the existence of any of the insurance policies required by the Agreement do not and shall not waive any rights the City may have against Subdivider.
12. Subdivider's Insurance
All insurance requirements contained in this Agreement are applicable to any contract entered into by Subdivider and/or any of Subdivider's contractors, subcontractors, agents and/or employees. Subdivider shall not commence work under this Agreement until Subdivider has obtained all insurance required under this Section, nor shall Subdivider allow any contractor or subcontractor to commence work on his contract or subcontract until all similar insurance required of the contractor or subcontractor shall have been so obtained and approved.
Subdivider shall provide the City with not less than thirty (30) days notice prior to the cancellation, reduction or termination of any insurance coverages required by this section. All requirements herein provided shall appear either in the body of the insurance policies or as endorsements and shall specifically bind the insurance carrier. a) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance
Subdivider shall procure and maintain at its own expense, during the initial term of this Agreement (and during any extension periods), Comprehensive General Liability insurance (including contractual liability), of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, death, loss, or damage resulting from the wrongful or negligent acts by Subdivider or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents and independent contractors.
b) Commercial Vehicle (Automobile) Liability Insurance
Subdivider shall further procure and maintain, at its own expense, during the initial term of this Agreement (and during any extension periods) Commercial Vehicle Liability insurance covering personal injury and property damage, of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit, covering any vehicle utilized by Subdivider or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors in performing the services required by this Agreement. c) Workers' Compensation Insurance
Subdivider shall procure and maintain at its own expense, during the initial term of this Agreement (and during any extension periods), Workers' Compensation insurance, providing coverage as required by the California State Workers' Compensation Law. If any class of employees employed by the Subdivider pursuant to this Agreement is not protected by the California State Workers' Compensation Law, Subdivider shall provide adequate insurance for the protection of such employees to the satisfaction of the City.
d) Additional Named Insured
Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any required insurance policies or any subsequent endorsements attached thereto, all insurance policies, except for the Workers' Compensation policy, shall be endorsed to name the City and its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors, including, without limitation, the City Attorney, as Additional Insureds. 4 CCP:ccp
/shared/Development/Plan Checking-PermittingfTract Files/Tract 17089/Agreements/17089.SubdivisionAgreement.110618 4 e) Waiver of Subrogation Rights
Subdivider shall require the carriers of all required insurance policies to waive all rights of subrogation against the City and its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents, and independent contractors and subcontractors. Each policy of insurance shall be endorsed to reflect such waiver. f) Proof of Insurance Coverage; Required Endorsements
Subdivider shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies authorized to transact insurance business in the State of California, the policies of insurance required by this Agreement and furnish to the City Clerk certificates of insurance evidencing the required coverage, and policy endorsements at least one (1) business day prior to commencement of any services to be performed under this Agreement.
The policies and certificates of insurance shall be endorsed to provide that in the event of cancellation or amendment of any required insurance policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by mail, postage prepaid, not less than thirty (30) days before the cancellation or amendment is effective. In the case of cancellation for non-payment, ten (10) days advance written notice shall be given.
Each policy and certificate of insurance shall be endorsed to provide that the policy shall not be terminated or expire without first providing thirty (30) days written notice to the City of such termination or expiration.
Each policy and certificate of insurance shall be endorsed to provide that the policy will be maintained throughout the initial term (and during any extension periods) of this Agreement.
The Comprehensive General Liability and Commercial Vehicle liability policies shall be endorsed to contain the following provision: "For any claims related to this Agreement, Subdivider's coverage shall be primary with respect to the City. Any insurance maintained by the City shall be in excess of Subdivider's insurance and shall not contribute with it."
13. Title to Improvements
Title to, and ownership of, all street improvements and sewers constructed hereunder by Subdivider shall vest absolutely in City, upon completion and acceptance of such improvements by City. Title to water works shall vest in the special district.
14. Repair or Reconstruction of Defective Work
If, within a period of one year after final acceptance of the work performed under this Agreement, any structure or part of any structure furnished and/or installed or constructed, or caused to be installed or constructed by Subdivider, or any of the work done under this Agreement, fails to fulfill any of the requirements of this Agreement or the specifications referred to herein, Subdivider shall without delay and without any cost to City, repair or replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the work or structure. Should Subdivider fail to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement, or should the exigencies of the case require repairs or replacements to be made before Subdivider can be notified, City may, at its option, make the necessary repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work and Subdivider shall pay to City the actual cost of such repairs plus fifteen percent (15%).
15. Subdivider not Agent of City
Neither Subdivider nor any of Subdivider's agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of City in connection with the performance of Subdivider's obligations under this Agreement. 5 CCP:ccp
/shared/Development/PlanChecking-PermittingfTract FilesfTract 17089/Agreements/17089.SubdivisionAgreement.110618
16. Cost of Engineering and Inspection
Subdivider shall pay City in accordance with Chapter 17, of the Victorville Municipal Code, for all engineering, inspection, and other services furnished by City in connection with the Subdivision.
17. Notice of Breach and Default
If Subdivider refuses or fails to obtain prosecution of the work, or any severable part thereof, with such diligence as will insure its completion within the time specified, or any extensions thereof, or fails to obtain completion of said work within such time, or if the Subdivider should be adjudged a bankrupt, or Subdivider should make a general assignment for the benefit of Subdivider's insolvency or if Subdivider, or any of Subdivider's contractors, subcontractors, agents, or employees, should violate any of the provisions of this Agreement, City Engineer or City Council may serve written notice upon Subdivider and Subdivider's surety of breach of this Agreement, or of any portion thereof, and default of Subdivider.
18. Breach of Agreement; Performance by Surety or City
In the event of any such notice, Subdivider's surety shall have the duty to take over and complete the work and the improvements herein specified; provided, however, that if the surety, within five (5) days after the serving upon it of such notice of breach, does not give City written notice of its intention to take over the performance of the contract, and does not commence performance thereof within five (5) days after notice to City of such election, City may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or by any other method City may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of Subdivider, and Subdivider's surety shall be liable to City for any excess cost or damages occasioned City thereby; and, in such event, City, without liability for so doing, may take possession of, and utilize in completing the work, such materials, appliances, plant and other property belonging to Subdivider as may be on the site of the work and necessary therefor.
19. Completion
Upon completion of all the work described in the said Agreement, and upon the City Council authorizing a written Notice of Completion and Acceptance of said work, the City will release all hold and any claims to 80% of the amount specified above, for faithful performance. The remaining 20% shall be held by the City for a period of one (1) year after the date of the Notice of Completion as a guarantee bond to secure the performance of Section 14 of this Agreement and shall thereafter be released. The amount specified above for labor and materials shall be reduced or released pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code §66499.7(h).
20. Notices
All notices required by or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this Section. Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if mailed, on the date of deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be addressed as follows:
If to City:
With a copy to:
City of Victorville
Attention: City Engineer
P.O. Box 5001
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92393-5001
Green, de Bortnowsky & Quintanilla, LLP
23801 Calabasas Road, Suite 1015
Calabasas, CA 91302
Attn: Andre de Bortnowsky, City Attorney
6 CCP:ccp
/shared/Development/PlanChecking-PermittingfTract Files/Tract 17089/Agreements/17089.SubdivisionAgreement.110618 If to Subdivider:
With a copy to:
Victorville 115 Lots, LP
400 E. Rincon, Suite 105
Corona, CA 92879
If to surety:
Any Party or the surety may change such address by notice in writing to the other Party and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to such new address.
21. Binding Effect of Agreement
This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the Parties to this Agreement and their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns.
22. Severability; Modification; Entire Agreement
The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified in writing by the mutual consent of the Parties. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them with respect to the subject matter hereof. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representatives of the Parties.
23. Authority of Executing Parties
The persons executing this Agreement warrant and represent that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of and bind the Party each purports to represent.
24. Incorporation of Recitals
The Recitals to this Agreement are hereby incorporated into in the terms of this Agreement. [END OF THIS PAGE]
[SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW]
7 CCP:ccp
/shared/Development/PlanChecking-PermittingfTract Files/Tract 17089/Agreements/17089.SubdivisionAgreement.110618 If to Subdivider:
With a copy to:
Victorville 115 Lots, LP
400 E. Rincon, Suite 105
Corona, CA 92879
If to surety:
Any Party or the surety may change such address by notice in writing to the other Party and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to such new address.
21. Binding Effect of Agreement
This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the Parties to this Agreement and their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns.
22. Severability; Modification; Entire Agreement
The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified in writing by the mutual consent of the Parties. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them with respect to the subject matter hereof. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representatives of the Parties.
23. Authority of Executing Parties
The persons executing this Agreement warrant and represent that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of and bind the Party each purports to represent.
24. Incorporation of Recitals
The Recitals to this Agreement are hereby incorporated into in the terms of this Agreement. [END OF THIS PAGE]
[SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW]
7 CCP:ccp
ishared/Development/PlanChecking-PermittingiTract Files/Tract 17089/Agreements/17089.SubdivisionAgreement.110618 ,q
APPROVED AS TO F
DATED this .- 9- 4 1,A-NA. day ofC)e,NAttie.C - 2O\
SUBDIVIDER CITY
Victorville 115 Lot City of Victorville
By: ..••• andeta
• tri%%? es,:t‘aoeli. =el ,arkVflor
Name: Gnot '54=me.v. .4t ?e•glitskle-cv ir•
Title: +c.e- WitsocAclanic-
Date: cz• • ‘4:7) • r-cz•tf :::: ,
By: ,
Name: (710 11 -
Title: Mayor
ATTEST:
(Proper Notarization of Subdivider's
Signature is required and shall be BY:
attached) Charlene Robinson, City Clerk
Andre de Bortnowsky, City Attorney
City of Victorville Risk Manager
Chuck Buquet
8 CCP:ccp
/shared/Development/PlanChecking-PermittingfTract Files/Tract 17089/Agreements/17089.SubdivisionAgreement.110618 re Insert Name and Title of the Officer
() of Signer(4
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 rk!'":".v":"• A
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of alif
cLQ- County o
On CI t oi (9012 before me,
Date
personally appeared
Boross, Notary Public
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person) whose namep)CD/a subscribe91 to the within instrument and acknowagpd t9 me thatf&slie/t y executed the same ip (51/hfrith6ir authorized capacity(ipg), and that by dr/th6ir signature(?) on the instrument the person(), or the entity upon behalf of which the person) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
P. BOROSS
Notary Public - California
Riverside County
Commission #2218474
My Comm. Expires Nov 12. 2021
WITNESS my h cial seal.
Signature
Signature of Notary Public
Place Notary Seal Above
OPTIONAL
Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:
Document Date: Number of Pages:
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name:
D Corporate Officer — Title(s):
D Partner — El Limited OGeneral
0 Individual 0 Attorney in Fact
0 Trustee 0 Guardian or Conservator
0 Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Signer's Name:
0 Corporate Officer — Title(s):
0 Partner — El Limited 0 General
0 Individual 0 Attorney in Fact
0 Trustee 0 Guardian or Conservator
0 Other:
Signer Is Representing:
" 4 \ -% •
©2015 National Notary Association • www.NationalNotary.org • 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907
Attachment C
SIA Release
Recording Requested by:
The City of Victorville
When Recorded Please Return To:
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
Various APNs
Recording of this document is fee exempt under
Government Code Section 6103.
No Docum entary Transfer Tax is due on the document
pursuant to Revenue Taxation Code Section 11922
RELEASE OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
Tract Map No. 17089
WHEREAS, the City of Victorville, hereinafter called “CITY” entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Victorville 115 Lots, LP, hereinafter called “DEVELOPER”, for the substitution of existing security of Tract Map No. 1 7089, hereinafter called “PROPERTY”; and
WHEREAS, said Subdivision Agreement imposed duties, obligations, and requirements on the City and DEVELOPER; and
WHEREAS, such performance, obligations, and req uirements were recorded on December 12, 2018 as Document No. 2018-0459117 in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration that these properties having a Subdivision Agreement against them by and between Victorville 115, Lots LP and the CITY and to be in compliance with said agreement hereinabove stated, the CITY hereby releases DEVELOPER from any further duty, obligation, or requirement imposed pursuant to the above indicated document only, and the same is hereby deemed of no further form and effect and shall cease to exist as a lien, duty obligation, or cloud on the title to the following described real properties:
See Exhibit “A”
I hereby state that all performances, obligations, and requirements required by the Subdivision Agreement, herein identified, per Title 17 of the Victorville Municipal Code required for Tract Map No. 17089 have been complied with on the hereinabove described property.
_________________________
Brian Gengler, City Engineer
R.C.E. 44730
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
By: _____________________________
Debra Sue Jones, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney
RISK MANAGEMENT:
_________________________________
John Preston, Risk Manager
EXHIBIT “A”
Lots 1-23, inclusive, Lots 49-60, inclusive, and Lots 82-134, inclusive, of Tract 17089, recorded in Map Book No. 328, pages 21 through 28 inclusive, in the Office of the San Bernardino County Recorder.
Item Number: 9
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 21, 2023
Submitted By:
Brian Gengler, City Engineer
Subject:
Release of Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Full Security Deposit Release for Tract Map No. 17945
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council approve the release of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and the full release of the Security Deposit for Tract Map No. 17945.
Fiscal Impact:
If approved, a reimbursement of $2,891.68 will be issued from the Engineering’s Deposit Trust Account No. 600-23130. Because it is a trust account, there will be no net fiscal impact to the budgeted Engineering Department accounts.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Goal E., Strategy 1. in the Strategic Plan, “Invest in Infrastructure” and “Implement the City’s Capital Improvement Program to meet community needs.” Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, we apply the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community’s needs.
Background:
Tract Map No. 17945 is a commercial tract map which resulted in the subdivision of property located south of West Sage Street and west of Cajon Street. The final map was recorded in May of 2007. The Developer, Civic Center Investors, LLC, was required to enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) with the City and make a security deposit prior to development of the property.
Discussion:
The Developer has completed all the required public improvements; therefore, staff recommends that the Council approve the release of the SIA and security deposit. 2 9
9 4
Staff is available to answer any questions City Council may have.
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Exiting SIA
C. SIA Release
D. Deposit Receipt
Attachment A
Vicinity Map
Tract Map No. 17945
Attachment B
Existing SIA
Attachment C
SIA Release
Recording Requested by:
The City of Victorville
When Recorded Please Return To:
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
Recording of this document is fee exempt under
Government Code Section 6103.
No Docum entary Transfer Tax is due on the document
pursuant to Revenue Taxation Code Section 11922
RELEASE OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
Tract Map No. 17945 (TT-06-031)
WHEREAS, the City of Victorville , hereinafter called “CITY” entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Civic Center Investors, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, hereinafter called “DEVELOPER”, for the substitution of existing security of Tract Map No. 17945, hereinafter called “PROPERTY”; and
WHEREAS, said Subdivision Agreement imposed duties, obligations, and requirements on the City and DEVELOPER; and
WHEREAS, such performance, obligations, and req uirements were recorded on May 9, 2007 as Document No. 2007- 0283361 in the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration that these properties having a Subdivision Agreement against them by and between Civic Center Investors, LLC, a California Limited Liability Comp any and the CITY and to be in compliance with said agreement hereinabove stated, the CITY hereby releases DEVELOPER from any further duty, obligation, or requirement imposed pursuant to the above indicated document only, and the same is hereby deemed of no further form and effect and shall cease to exist as a lien, duty obligation, or cloud on the title to the following described real properties:
See Exhibit “A”
I hereby state that all performances, obligations, and requirements required by the Subdivision Agreement, herein identified, per Title 17 of the Victorville Municipal Code required for Tract Map No. 17945 have been complied with on the hereinabove described property.
_________________________
Brian Gengler, City Engineer
R.C.E. 44730
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
By: _____________________________
Debra Sue Jones, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney
RISK MANAGEMENT:
_________________________________
John Preston, Risk Manager
EXHIBIT “A”
Lot 1, inclusive, of Tract 17945, recorded in Map Book No. 328, pages 61 through 62 inclusive, in the Office of the San Bernardino County Recorder.
Attachment D
Deposit Receipt
Item Number: 10
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 21, 2023
Submitted By:
John Mendiola, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Payroll Warrant List
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Payroll Demand Schedule No. 7A for Payroll Period December 23, 2022, through January 06, 2023, in the amount of $2,130,546.09 covering Check Nos. 33217 through 33227, including Vendor checks.
Please note employee Check No. 33219 has a live Check and an EFT Advice. Also included is Advice No. 295655 and Nos. 296133 through 296615, per adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 (period covering July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023).
Fiscal Impact:
A total fiscal impact of $2,130,546.09 is authorized with this action. The attached report details the payments by check numbers.
Discussion:
I hereby certify that the claims or demands covered by the attached list of warrants have been audited as to the accuracy and availability of funds for payment thereof and that said claims or demands are accurate and the funds are available for payment thereof.
Attachments: A. Payroll Warrant List PPE 010623
Attachment A
Payroll Report PPE 010623
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 01/30/2023Page 1 of 12 City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
Payroll Period Beginning: December 23, 2022 through January 06, 2023 Checks
Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
33217 3466 01/13/2023 $545.82
33218 3551 01/13/2023 $679.14
33219 2705 01/13/2023 $1,177.56
33220 240 01/13/2023 $5.00
33221 787 01/13/2023 $50.00
33222 1145 01/13/2023 $75.00
33223 1146 01/13/2023 $1,430.72
33224 1182 01/13/2023 $100.00
33225 13491 01/13/2023 $422.31
33226 18154 01/13/2023 $175.00
33227 20821 01/13/2023 $423.00
Checks Total 5,083.55
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 01/30/2023Page 2 of 12 Advices
Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
33219 2705 01/13/2023 $2,000.00
295655 3407 12/30/2022 $4,261.83
296133 2204 12/30/2022 $6,977.92
296134 3598 12/30/2022 $3,354.63
296135 3522 01/06/2023 $3,484.10
296136 2204 01/06/2023 $7,683.15
296137 1990 01/06/2023 $14,763.10
296138 3608 01/13/2023 $2,332.58
296139 1099 01/13/2023 $761.85
296140 3495 01/13/2023 $2,155.01
296141 3597 01/13/2023 $3,511.43
296142 3243 01/13/2023 $3,845.40
296143 2115 01/13/2023 $5,071.32
296144 3142 01/13/2023 $1,654.23
296145 3297 01/13/2023 $731.27
296146 3458 01/13/2023 $402.75
296147 3229 01/13/2023 $4,373.17
296148 3283 01/13/2023 $2,530.14
296149 1064 01/13/2023 $7,071.02
296150 3467 01/13/2023 $1,953.25
296151 3573 01/13/2023 $1,478.06
296152 1706 01/13/2023 $4,606.63
296153 2395 01/13/2023 $3,488.28
296154 3700 01/13/2023 $2,001.87
296155 3625 01/13/2023 $2,051.68
296156 3684 01/13/2023 $2,079.21
296157 2624 01/13/2023 $2,439.54
296158 3043 01/13/2023 $2,111.70
296159 3031 01/13/2023 $2,779.38
296160 1748 01/13/2023 $2,737.18
296161 2361 01/13/2023 $2,178.79
296162 3328 01/13/2023 $2,282.00
296163 3638 01/13/2023 $5,328.46
296164 3561 01/13/2023 $2,351.81
296165 1903 01/13/2023 $1,735.16
296166 3616 01/13/2023 $2,337.85
296167 3630 01/13/2023 $1,745.38
296168 3527 01/13/2023 $1,834.23
296169 2682 01/13/2023 $2,186.88
296170 2627 01/13/2023 $2,018.72
296171 2366 01/13/2023 $1,808.91
296172 3643 01/13/2023 $3,452.47
296173 2594 01/13/2023 $2,824.28
296174 3516 01/13/2023 $2,468.98
296175 3695 01/13/2023 $1,997.84
296176 2093 01/13/2023 $1,736.48
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 01/30/2023Page 3 of 12 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
296177 3697 01/13/2023 $4,856.05
296178 1973 01/13/2023 $2,962.88
296179 2019 01/13/2023 $2,493.21
296180 3494 01/13/2023 $2,444.52
296181 2233 01/13/2023 $2,749.90
296182 2606 01/13/2023 $2,254.88
296183 3660 01/13/2023 $1,763.69
296184 3046 01/13/2023 $2,000.48
296185 1635 01/13/2023 $4,837.05
296186 3653 01/13/2023 $2,370.56
296187 3327 01/13/2023 $2,096.64
296188 3624 01/13/2023 $2,257.54
296189 3009 01/13/2023 $3,262.14
296190 2618 01/13/2023 $1,754.81
296191 2619 01/13/2023 $2,350.57
296192 2603 01/13/2023 $1,781.16
296193 2491 01/13/2023 $2,405.68
296194 2235 01/13/2023 $4,538.57
296195 2300 01/13/2023 $3,331.59
296196 2655 01/13/2023 $1,680.55
296197 2685 01/13/2023 $1,777.27
296198 3521 01/13/2023 $2,274.15
296199 3528 01/13/2023 $2,245.10
296200 3045 01/13/2023 $2,584.36
296201 3499 01/13/2023 $2,366.32
296202 3362 01/13/2023 $2,094.43
296203 2297 01/13/2023 $1,979.66
296204 2232 01/13/2023 $2,780.33
296205 1957 01/13/2023 $2,565.10
296206 3290 01/13/2023 $2,036.96
296207 3085 01/13/2023 $2,139.95
296208 3246 01/13/2023 $3,145.95
296209 2042 01/13/2023 $5,004.94
296210 3714 01/13/2023 $1,638.17
296211 2102 01/13/2023 $2,760.79
296212 2032 01/13/2023 $3,263.54
296213 3615 01/13/2023 $3,354.27
296214 2323 01/13/2023 $3,320.26
296215 1767 01/13/2023 $2,927.56
296216 3508 01/13/2023 $2,118.06
296217 3682 01/13/2023 $3,208.81
296218 2225 01/13/2023 $4,082.98
296219 3544 01/13/2023 $2,018.24
296220 3221 01/13/2023 $2,532.08
296221 3627 01/13/2023 $2,096.73
296222 1533 01/13/2023 $2,119.90
296223 2833 01/13/2023 $2,107.97
296224 2211 01/13/2023 $4,901.37
296225 3497 01/13/2023 $1,605.61
296226 1426 01/13/2023 $1,476.21
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 01/30/2023Page 4 of 12 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
296227 3105 01/13/2023 $1,783.10
296228 3703 01/13/2023 $2,010.51
296229 2254 01/13/2023 $2,938.50
296230 3618 01/13/2023 $1,994.27
296231 3482 01/13/2023 $1,751.37
296232 3354 01/13/2023 $3,915.10
296233 3011 01/13/2023 $1,725.27
296234 3623 01/13/2023 $1,326.86
296235 3295 01/13/2023 $1,843.98
296236 3400 01/13/2023 $2,568.61
296237 3184 01/13/2023 $3,239.58
296238 3547 01/13/2023 $1,619.51
296239 3673 01/13/2023 $1,518.12
296240 3288 01/13/2023 $1,659.00
296241 3702 01/13/2023 $1,844.80
296242 2742 01/13/2023 $2,761.36
296243 3089 01/13/2023 $2,781.09
296244 3641 01/13/2023 $1,607.06
296245 2379 01/13/2023 $1,985.50
296246 3672 01/13/2023 $1,518.12
296247 3634 01/13/2023 $2,647.00
296248 2711 01/13/2023 $1,716.96
296249 3639 01/13/2023 $2,058.17
296250 3586 01/13/2023 $43.89
296251 3190 01/13/2023 $2,812.41
296252 2249 01/13/2023 $4,938.05
296253 3650 01/13/2023 $1,502.02
296254 3393 01/13/2023 $1,685.72
296255 3250 01/13/2023 $1,618.24
296256 3491 01/13/2023 $1,370.39
296257 3548 01/13/2023 $1,455.40
296258 3511 01/13/2023 $1,924.02
296259 3581 01/13/2023 $2,183.49
296260 3396 01/13/2023 $1,945.66
296261 3663 01/13/2023 $1,623.04
296262 3541 01/13/2023 $2,302.92
296263 2499 01/13/2023 $4,104.47
296264 3379 01/13/2023 $2,762.11
296265 3694 01/13/2023 $3,077.01
296266 2105 01/13/2023 $4,559.05
296267 3474 01/13/2023 $2,074.61
296268 2515 01/13/2023 $3,038.41
296269 3636 01/13/2023 $2,541.17
296270 2679 01/13/2023 $2,966.59
296271 3490 01/13/2023 $3,531.96
296272 3475 01/13/2023 $2,759.35
296273 2181 01/13/2023 $2,927.99
296274 3353 01/13/2023 $2,622.00
296275 3542 01/13/2023 $2,682.86
296276 1955 01/13/2023 $3,242.66
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 01/30/2023Page 5 of 12 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
296277 1632 01/13/2023 $2,117.83
296278 3692 01/13/2023 $2,792.35
296279 3148 01/13/2023 $2,931.40
296280 3195 01/13/2023 $1,821.36
296281 3602 01/13/2023 $2,343.89
296282 1970 01/13/2023 $2,308.03
296283 1520 01/13/2023 $2,271.25
296284 2605 01/13/2023 $2,067.28
296285 3505 01/13/2023 $4,603.23
296286 2540 01/13/2023 $3,367.64
296287 2377 01/13/2023 $2,814.38
296288 1079 01/13/2023 $2,542.68
296289 2312 01/13/2023 $3,326.14
296290 3510 01/13/2023 $2,191.32
296291 3637 01/13/2023 $2,620.22
296292 1901 01/13/2023 $5,898.90
296293 3628 01/13/2023 $2,191.77
296294 3068 01/13/2023 $2,055.21
296295 3633 01/13/2023 $2,409.38
296296 3129 01/13/2023 $3,363.79
296297 1998 01/13/2023 $2,822.20
296298 2376 01/13/2023 $4,366.67
296299 2111 01/13/2023 $2,927.35
296300 3543 01/13/2023 $2,042.18
296301 3303 01/13/2023 $3,586.67
296302 3558 01/13/2023 $2,557.45
296303 1655 01/13/2023 $6,525.29
296304 3285 01/13/2023 $3,448.14
296305 1529 01/13/2023 $1,939.61
296306 3238 01/13/2023 $4,153.96
296307 3242 01/13/2023 $2,435.21
296308 3346 01/13/2023 $2,099.05
296309 1776 01/13/2023 $3,072.32
296310 3192 01/13/2023 $2,029.93
296311 2798 01/13/2023 $2,139.15
296312 2522 01/13/2023 $626.58
296313 3265 01/13/2023 $1,983.88
296314 1503 01/13/2023 $2,977.57
296315 1515 01/13/2023 $2,267.49
296316 2505 01/13/2023 $2,734.47
296317 3299 01/13/2023 $1,777.19
296318 3113 01/13/2023 $2,060.19
296319 1007 01/13/2023 $3,414.66
296320 2343 01/13/2023 $1,831.80
296321 3273 01/13/2023 $2,442.75
296322 3121 01/13/2023 $1,854.20
296323 1497 01/13/2023 $2,489.75
296324 3537 01/13/2023 $2,308.92
296325 2192 01/13/2023 $1,964.22
296326 3513 01/13/2023 $2,132.76
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 01/30/2023Page 6 of 12 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
296327 3685 01/13/2023 $1,617.93
296328 2034 01/13/2023 $3,294.93
296329 2275 01/13/2023 $2,834.80
296330 3380 01/13/2023 $2,393.25
296331 3191 01/13/2023 $2,350.88
296332 2530 01/13/2023 $2,851.66
296333 3496 01/13/2023 $1,185.82
296334 3051 01/13/2023 $1,951.37
296335 1750 01/13/2023 $2,360.21
296336 2770 01/13/2023 $1,870.77
296337 2228 01/13/2023 $2,629.30
296338 3101 01/13/2023 $2,620.10
296339 3335 01/13/2023 $2,130.46
296340 3611 01/13/2023 $1,544.17
296341 1249 01/13/2023 $2,001.50
296342 3284 01/13/2023 $2,736.18
296343 3580 01/13/2023 $1,455.40
296344 3621 01/13/2023 $1,455.40
296345 3270 01/13/2023 $1,789.96
296346 2248 01/13/2023 $1,947.50
296347 3263 01/13/2023 $1,733.91
296348 3622 01/13/2023 $1,356.88
296349 1588 01/13/2023 $2,131.33
296350 2189 01/13/2023 $3,045.22
296351 3560 01/13/2023 $1,952.91
296352 3509 01/13/2023 $2,013.24
296353 3226 01/13/2023 $2,616.46
296354 3257 01/13/2023 $1,817.92
296355 1121 01/13/2023 $2,360.66
296356 2689 01/13/2023 $550.10
296357 3149 01/13/2023 $2,638.89
296358 1865 01/13/2023 $2,048.90
296359 3479 01/13/2023 $1,608.24
296360 3689 01/13/2023 $1,619.51
296361 1723 01/13/2023 $1,513.53
296362 3296 01/13/2023 $2,109.19
296363 3707 01/13/2023 $2,155.44
296364 3572 01/13/2023 $1,608.11
296365 2531 01/13/2023 $2,798.37
296366 1513 01/13/2023 $1,994.51
296367 2118 01/13/2023 $944.89
296368 3387 01/13/2023 $1,418.33
296369 3330 01/13/2023 $1,687.91
296370 2681 01/13/2023 $3,261.35
296371 2119 01/13/2023 $1,846.46
296372 1612 01/13/2023 $1,975.10
296373 1282 01/13/2023 $2,283.92
296374 3610 01/13/2023 $2,567.84
296375 3277 01/13/2023 $1,769.41
296376 3287 01/13/2023 $1,884.39
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 01/30/2023Page 7 of 12 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
296377 3037 01/13/2023 $1,962.61
296378 1449 01/13/2023 $2,742.12
296379 3481 01/13/2023 $1,874.79
296380 2677 01/13/2023 $5,014.76
296381 3688 01/13/2023 $1,455.40
296382 3341 01/13/2023 $2,002.42
296383 1137 01/13/2023 $1,814.86
296384 2383 01/13/2023 $1,837.51
296385 3687 01/13/2023 $1,391.13
296386 3130 01/13/2023 $2,473.57
296387 2489 01/13/2023 $1,666.02
296388 3361 01/13/2023 $3,062.98
296389 3139 01/13/2023 $2,070.53
296390 3099 01/13/2023 $1,319.98
296391 2696 01/13/2023 $1,826.67
296392 1287 01/13/2023 $2,949.30
296393 3536 01/13/2023 $2,769.75
296394 1254 01/13/2023 $2,140.74
296395 3187 01/13/2023 $1,572.97
296396 2368 01/13/2023 $1,897.09
296397 3095 01/13/2023 $2,185.89
296398 3532 01/13/2023 $1,909.82
296399 3258 01/13/2023 $2,059.84
296400 3100 01/13/2023 $2,680.60
296401 3259 01/13/2023 $2,339.36
296402 3344 01/13/2023 $2,113.72
296403 1338 01/13/2023 $3,448.01
296404 3507 01/13/2023 $1,792.81
296405 2229 01/13/2023 $1,714.09
296406 1049 01/13/2023 $2,285.23
296407 1506 01/13/2023 $1,911.44
296408 1959 01/13/2023 $3,381.77
296409 3004 01/13/2023 $1,891.54
296410 1893 01/13/2023 $1,998.07
296411 3626 01/13/2023 $1,871.10
296412 1581 01/13/2023 $2,526.96
296413 3279 01/13/2023 $1,923.65
296414 2460 01/13/2023 $2,400.23
296415 3671 01/13/2023 $1,644.60
296416 3112 01/13/2023 $1,595.85
296417 2732 01/13/2023 $1,829.17
296418 2552 01/13/2023 $2,467.27
296419 2476 01/13/2023 $3,977.12
296420 2279 01/13/2023 $2,456.31
296421 3515 01/13/2023 $4,851.40
296422 3092 01/13/2023 $2,503.61
296423 3138 01/13/2023 $2,689.23
296424 3146 01/13/2023 $2,795.75
296425 2590 01/13/2023 $2,057.25
296426 2748 01/13/2023 $2,059.02
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 01/30/2023Page 8 of 12 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
296427 3709 01/13/2023 $2,609.35
296428 2669 01/13/2023 $3,094.21
296429 2623 01/13/2023 $2,610.40
296430 2637 01/13/2023 $2,911.17
296431 3079 01/13/2023 $1,765.16
296432 2638 01/13/2023 $2,827.64
296433 3109 01/13/2023 $2,484.50
296434 2671 01/13/2023 $3,603.94
296435 3019 01/13/2023 $3,269.68
296436 2593 01/13/2023 $2,437.93
296437 3461 01/13/2023 $2,075.46
296438 2626 01/13/2023 $1,437.83
296439 3038 01/13/2023 $2,569.31
296440 3052 01/13/2023 $2,486.95
296441 2290 01/13/2023 $1,953.95
296442 3716 01/13/2023 $1,637.61
296443 3110 01/13/2023 $2,580.95
296444 2641 01/13/2023 $3,130.29
296445 2612 01/13/2023 $2,629.98
296446 3698 01/13/2023 $1,294.66
296447 2642 01/13/2023 $3,065.69
296448 3705 01/13/2023 $2,635.77
296449 3331 01/13/2023 $1,762.05
296450 2674 01/13/2023 $2,574.53
296451 3231 01/13/2023 $2,341.10
296452 3228 01/13/2023 $2,357.43
296453 2628 01/13/2023 $2,801.57
296454 3301 01/13/2023 $1,642.90
296455 2630 01/13/2023 $2,502.59
296456 3182 01/13/2023 $2,553.72
296457 2599 01/13/2023 $2,642.79
296458 2683 01/13/2023 $3,631.71
296459 2753 01/13/2023 $2,264.56
296460 2610 01/13/2023 $3,801.97
296461 3323 01/13/2023 $1,935.07
296462 1389 01/13/2023 $4,657.29
296463 3264 01/13/2023 $3,111.03
296464 2808 01/13/2023 $1,831.76
296465 2646 01/13/2023 $4,252.19
296466 3617 01/13/2023 $1,469.19
296467 2600 01/13/2023 $3,948.69
296468 2524 01/13/2023 $2,615.65
296469 2686 01/13/2023 $1,946.18
296470 2193 01/13/2023 $3,665.07
296471 3322 01/13/2023 $2,264.24
296472 3629 01/13/2023 $2,391.55
296473 3230 01/13/2023 $11,442.88
296474 1931 01/13/2023 $2,032.62
296475 2038 01/13/2023 $1,587.71
296476 2339 01/13/2023 $2,505.30
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 01/30/2023Page 9 of 12 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
296477 2678 01/13/2023 $3,636.88
296478 3240 01/13/2023 $1,916.83
296479 3215 01/13/2023 $2,749.91
296480 3140 01/13/2023 $1,952.28
296481 3035 01/13/2023 $1,973.00
296482 3651 01/13/2023 $2,061.95
296483 3185 01/13/2023 $2,312.04
296484 1853 01/13/2023 $2,827.74
296485 3645 01/13/2023 $982.90
296486 3503 01/13/2023 $2,574.67
296487 3589 01/13/2023 $831.36
296488 3676 01/13/2023 $347.42
296489 3579 01/13/2023 $689.47
296490 3376 01/13/2023 $3,449.74
296491 3384 01/13/2023 $1,075.70
296492 3386 01/13/2023 $1,839.90
296493 2488 01/13/2023 $1,165.86
296494 3120 01/13/2023 $1,257.44
296495 3502 01/13/2023 $2,537.52
296496 3582 01/13/2023 $1,169.75
296497 3654 01/13/2023 $868.08
296498 3252 01/13/2023 $2,497.51
296499 3070 01/13/2023 $2,199.38
296500 3657 01/13/2023 $691.50
296501 1866 01/13/2023 $2,369.78
296502 3371 01/13/2023 $1,342.65
296503 3674 01/13/2023 $1,135.97
296504 3717 01/13/2023 $225.35
296505 3655 01/13/2023 $1,171.29
296506 3656 01/13/2023 $1,106.31
296507 2478 01/13/2023 $1,219.43
296508 3648 01/13/2023 $593.15
296509 3470 01/13/2023 $824.31
296510 3471 01/13/2023 $1,285.69
296511 3531 01/13/2023 $3,832.80
296512 3587 01/13/2023 $1,106.30
296513 3669 01/13/2023 $510.29
296514 3029 01/13/2023 $1,754.27
296515 3326 01/13/2023 $3,155.98
296516 3649 01/13/2023 $454.46
296517 3609 01/13/2023 $1,106.30
296518 3492 01/13/2023 $226.23
296519 3691 01/13/2023 $737.55
296520 3576 01/13/2023 $1,271.35
296521 3647 01/13/2023 $690.40
296522 3566 01/13/2023 $944.02
296523 3368 01/13/2023 $1,776.09
296524 2006 01/13/2023 $1,427.82
296525 2684 01/13/2023 $1,456.92
296526 1966 01/13/2023 $2,084.66
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 01/30/2023Page 10 of 12 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
296527 2355 01/13/2023 $3,169.88
296528 3696 01/13/2023 $2,698.54
296529 3500 01/13/2023 $2,439.75
296530 2039 01/13/2023 $1,857.35
296531 3281 01/13/2023 $2,253.01
296532 3550 01/13/2023 $2,822.58
296533 2629 01/13/2023 $2,039.22
296534 3348 01/13/2023 $3,144.82
296535 1544 01/13/2023 $2,451.09
296536 3107 01/13/2023 $2,138.08
296537 3081 01/13/2023 $2,049.07
296538 3523 01/13/2023 $3,843.78
296539 3271 01/13/2023 $4,053.52
296540 3017 01/13/2023 $4,522.00
296541 3706 01/13/2023 $1,367.47
296542 3512 01/13/2023 $3,818.02
296543 2027 01/13/2023 $1,659.57
296544 2330 01/13/2023 $3,034.00
296545 1932 01/13/2023 $1,798.54
296546 3437 01/13/2023 $5,384.92
296547 3652 01/13/2023 $2,126.54
296548 3421 01/13/2023 $4,501.84
296549 3439 01/13/2023 $4,275.12
296550 3440 01/13/2023 $5,925.12
296551 3441 01/13/2023 $4,738.58
296552 3473 01/13/2023 $6,098.68
296553 3406 01/13/2023 $9,307.62
296554 3422 01/13/2023 $4,159.39
296555 3442 01/13/2023 $6,259.31
296556 3433 01/13/2023 $5,891.10
296557 3469 01/13/2023 $3,660.02
296558 3424 01/13/2023 $4,716.79
296559 3414 01/13/2023 $5,352.82
296560 3704 01/13/2023 $11,327.83
296561 3710 01/13/2023 $3,722.95
296562 3443 01/13/2023 $3,939.18
296563 3600 01/13/2023 $3,462.19
296564 3711 01/13/2023 $3,415.97
296565 3418 01/13/2023 $6,799.85
296566 3715 01/13/2023 $3,276.36
296567 3444 01/13/2023 $5,660.12
296568 3583 01/13/2023 $4,889.38
296569 3585 01/13/2023 $3,643.38
296570 3594 01/13/2023 $5,034.11
296571 3713 01/13/2023 $3,466.36
296572 1718 01/13/2023 $6,423.90
296573 3409 01/13/2023 $5,187.50
296574 3708 01/13/2023 $3,167.85
296575 3426 01/13/2023 $7,200.39
296576 3642 01/13/2023 $3,242.23
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 01/30/2023Page 11 of 12 Check Number Employee ID Check Date Total Net
296577 3584 01/13/2023 $5,412.96
296578 3538 01/13/2023 $2,231.91
296579 3410 01/13/2023 $5,012.13
296580 3447 01/13/2023 $5,282.25
296581 3427 01/13/2023 $7,400.63
296582 3607 01/13/2023 $3,560.76
296583 3411 01/13/2023 $5,307.29
296584 3448 01/13/2023 $6,043.29
296585 3571 01/13/2023 $2,505.30
296586 3518 01/13/2023 $1,938.84
296587 3449 01/13/2023 $6,794.32
296588 3428 01/13/2023 $4,156.79
296589 3429 01/13/2023 $3,619.24
296590 3455 01/13/2023 $5,318.87
296591 3451 01/13/2023 $5,383.14
296592 3712 01/13/2023 $3,600.65
296593 3595 01/13/2023 $5,202.72
296594 3430 01/13/2023 $5,177.87
296595 3452 01/13/2023 $7,196.09
296596 3417 01/13/2023 $5,054.17
296597 3431 01/13/2023 $6,271.19
296598 3419 01/13/2023 $4,168.09
296599 3720 01/13/2023 $5,651.02
296600 3524 01/13/2023 $4,929.14
296601 3412 01/13/2023 $5,694.58
296602 3420 01/13/2023 $4,030.15
296603 3378 01/13/2023 $4,116.93
296604 3435 01/13/2023 $5,283.22
296605 3432 01/13/2023 $5,595.64
296606 3408 01/13/2023 $6,325.47
296607 3456 01/13/2023 $5,305.78
296608 3591 01/13/2023 $4,757.77
296609 3392 01/13/2023 $7,758.19
296610 2210 01/13/2023 $3,666.47
296611 3434 01/13/2023 $5,499.60
296612 1533 01/13/2023 $246.37
296613 1990 01/13/2023 $197.10
296614 3710 01/13/2023 $591.30
296615 3712 01/13/2023 $591.30
Advices Total 1,344,759.06
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report 01/30/2023Page 12 of 12 Electronic Vendor Payments
Vendor Check Date Total Gross
IRS 12/30/2022 $3,883.93
IRS 1/6/2023 $9,143.96
IRS 1/13/2023 $242,741.62
State Taxes 12/30/2022 $793.23
State Taxes 1/9/2023 $2,378.37
State Taxes 1/13/2023 $70,988.27
ExpertPay (CASDU) 1/13/2023 $4,392.35
Deferred Comp (457) 1/3/2023 $27,000.00
Deferred Comp (457) 1/9/2023 $12,329.77
Deferred Comp (457) 1/13/2023 $77,052.52
Deferred Comp (457) 1/17/2023 $4,028.17
Deferred Comp (401a) 1/27/2023 $264.13
PERS 1/18/2023 $322,467.16
VV Firefighter's Union 1/11/2023 $3,240.00
Electronic Vendor Payments Total 780,703.48
Item Number: 11
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: February 21, 2023
Submitted By:
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
Subject:
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 2434
Recommendation:
That the City Council adopt, by second reading, Ordinance No. 2434 revising and establishing speed zones upon certain streets in the City by amending Title 12, Chapter
12.20, Section 12.20.020 of the Victorville Municipal Code, entitled “Decrease of State Law Maximum Speed.”
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.
Strategic Plan Goal:
The recommended action aligns with Strategic Plan Goal B, Public Safety, Strategy 1.d, “Increase police resources to reduce response times, engage in proactive policing and enhance the level of traffic enforcement.”
Discussion:
At the Regular City Council meeting held on February 7, 2023, the City Council voted to introduce Ordinance No. 2434, revising and establishing speed zones upon certain streets in the City by amending Title 12, Chapter 12.20, Section 12.20.020 of the Victorville Municipal Code, entitled “Decrease of State Law Maximum Speed.” This ordinance is being presented for adoption and once adopted, will become effective March 23, 2023.
Attachments: A. Ordinance No. 2434
ATTACHMENT A
O
RDINANCE NO. 2434
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VICTORVILLE REVISING AND ESTABLISHING SPEED ZONES UPON
CERTAIN STREETS IN THE CITY BY AMENDING TITLE 12, CHAPTER
12.20, SECTION 12.20.020 OF THE VICTORVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE, ENTITLED “DECREASE OF STATE LAW MAXIMUM SPEED”
T
HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Amendment of Section 12.20.020 of the Victorville Municipal Code Section 12.20.020 of the Victorville Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
12.20.020 - Decrease of state law maximum speed.
It is determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law as applicable upon the following streets is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declared that the prima facie speed limits shall be as set forth in Table 12.20.020 on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice thereof.
Table 12.20.020
Decrease of State Law Maximum Speed
S
treet From To
Declared Prima
Facie Speed
Limits
Air Expressway Adelanto Road Phantom St 60 mph
Phantom St Village Dr 60 mph
Village Dr National Trails Hwy 60 mph
Amargosa Rd. .5 mi. S. of Bear Valley
Rd
Bear Valley Rd 45 mph
Bear Valley Rd North Mall Entrance 45 mph
North Mall Entrance King Ranch Rd 45 mph
King Ranch Rd Palmdale Rd 45 mph
Palmdale Rd Seneca Rd 45 mph
Seneca Rd Mojave Dr 45 mph
Mojave Dr Village Dr 50 mph
Amethyst Rd. Sycamore St Bear Valley Rd 50 mph
Ordinance No. 2434