City Council Chambers
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA
www.victorvilleca.gov
VICTORVILLE CITY COUNCIL
VICTORVILLE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS AIRPORT AUTHORITY
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THE CITY AS HOUSING ASSETS SUCCESSOR
JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY
VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT
Regular Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, May 19, 2026
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
The
City
Council
holds
its
business
meetings
in
public
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
the
Ralph
M.
Brown
Act,
its
established
policies
and
procedures,
and
its
adopted
parliamentary
authority.
The
Council
strives
to
carry
out
its
meetings
in
an
atmosphere
of
professionalism
with
full
participation
by
members
of
the
body
and
the
public.
As
such,
the
Presiding
Officer
is
empowered
to
govern
City
Council
Meetings
to
foster
the
efficient
and
fair
administration
of
City
business
and
reserves
the
right
to
enforce
(or
cause
to
be
enforced)
the
Meeting
Rules
of
Conduct
and
Decorum
as
set
forth
in
Chapter
5 of
the
City
Council Policy and Procedures Manual.
The
City
Council
welcomes
and
encourages
public
participation
and
invites
the
community
to
attend
in
person.
City
Council
Meetings
will
be
held
in-person
at
City
Hall
in
Council
Chambers.
Remote
viewing
of
our
Council
Meetings
is
available
through
YouTube,
but
public
comments
must
be
given
in-person
at
the
meeting or in advance as noted below.
Public
Comments:
Members
of
the
public
may
submit
comments
electronically
by
4 p.m.
the
day
of
the
meeting
to
be
distributed
to
City
Council.
Participants
are
invited
to
address
the
Council
on
agendized
and
non-agendized
topics
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
Public
comments
will
be
no
longer
than
three
(3)
minutes
per
community
member.
Should
a
speaker
conclude
their
comments
prior
to
the
expiration
of
three
(3)
minutes,
the
speaker
waives
the
right
to
speak
for
any
remaining
amount
of
time.
For
further
information
about
how
to
address
the
Council,
please refer to the City's website at
victorvilleca.gov/agendas
.
LEVINE
ACT
DISCLOSURE:
Pursuant
to
the
Levine
Act
(Govt.
Code
section
84308),
any
party
to
a
permit,
license,
contract,
or
other
entitlement
before
the
Victorville
City
Council
is
required
to
disclose
on
the
record
any
campaign
contribution,
including
aggregated
contributions,
of
more
than
$500
made
by
the
party
or
the
party's
agents
within
the
preceding
12 months
to
any
City
official.
Participants
and
agents
are
requested
to
make
this
disclosure
as
well.
The
disclosure
must
include
the
name
of
the
party,
participant,
or
agent,
and
any
other
person
making
the
contribution;
the
name
of
the
recipient,
the
amount
of
the
contribution,
and
the
date
the
contribution was made.
In
compliance
with
the
Americans
with
Disabilities
Act,
if
you
need
special
assistance
to
participate
in
this
meeting,
please
contact
the
City
Clerk's
office
at
(760)
955-5188
no
later
than
72 hours
prior
to
the
meeting.
6:00 p.m. Regular Session
Call to Order
Roll Call
Invocation: Pastor Jacob Lane with Calvary Old Town Church
Pledge of Allegiance: Police Captain Jerry Davenport
Proclamations/Special Presentations
Presentation of Awards – 2026 Public Works Day Essay Winners
Proclamation Declaring May 17-23, 2026 as Public Works Week
Presentation of New Hires and Promotions to City Council
City Clerk Presents Agenda/Revisions to Agenda
Conflict of Interest Declarations
Any
items
on
this
agenda
that
might
be
a
conflict
of
interest
to
any
Council
Members/Board Members should be identified at this time.
Introduction to Public Comments
Public Comments
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map Nos. 16808-1 through 7
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1)
Approve
the
80-percent
release
of
the
Water
and
Sewer
Faithful
Performance Securities;
(2)
Approve
the
full
release
of
the
Monumentation
Faithful
Performance
Improvement Security; and
(3)
Accept the completed water and sewer improvements.
2. Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 20274
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
approve
the
full
release
of
the
Water,
Drainage,
and Sewer Labor and Material Securities for Tract Map No. 20274.
3. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 22
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
ratify
Commercial
Demand
Schedule
No.
22 for
the
period
of
April
16,
2026,
through
April
29,
2026,
in
total
amount
of
$13,367,888.94. This total includes:
•
Electronic
Fund
Transfers
No.
349023
through
349258
and
Warrant
No.
803571 through 803723 in the amount of $10,978,163.10.
•
Wire Transfers in the amount of $2,389,725.84.
All
are
consistent
with
the
adopted
Fiscal
Year
2025-2026
Budget
(covering
July
1,
2025, through June 30, 2026).
4. Fire Department Quarterly Report - Third Quarter
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council review and file.
5. Payroll Demand Schedule No. 9A
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
ratify
Payroll
Demand
Schedule
No.
9A
for
the
payroll
period
of
February
27,
2026,
through
March
13,
2026,
in
total
amount of $2,454,734.26. This total includes:
•
Employee
Check
Nos.
34820,
34830
through
34834
and
34851
through
34853 in the amount of $32,586.37.
•
Vendor Check Nos. 34835 through 34839 in the amount of $702.31. •
Advice
Nos.
341007
through
341587
and
342171
in
the
amount
of
$1,567,535.39; and
•
Vendor Electronic Payments totaling $853,910.19.
All
expenditures
are
consistent
with
the
adopted
Fiscal
Year
2025–2026
Budget
(covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
6. Payroll Demand Schedule No. 9B
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
and
Board
of
Directors
ratify
Payroll
Demand
Schedule
No.
9B
for
the
payroll
period
of
March
13,
2026,
through
March
27,
2026,
in
total
amount of $2,466,138.40. This total includes:
•
Employee Check Nos. 34840 through 34841 in the amount of $3,356.30. •
Vendor Check Nos. 34842 through 34850 in the amount of $5,891.60. •
Advice Nos. 341588 through 342169 in the amount of $1,583,567.58; and •
Vendor Electronic Payments totaling $873,322.92.
All
expenditures
are
consistent
with
the
adopted
Fiscal
Year
2025–2026
Budget
(covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
7. General Transaction and Use Tax - Infrastructure and Public Services
Recommendation:
That
your
Honorable
City
Council
direct
staff
to
proceed
with
the
next
steps
that
will
place a 1% sales tax measure on the November 2026 ballot.
8. Policy
regarding
disruption
of
telephonic
or
internet
services
occurring
during
meetings of the City Council pursuant to Senate Bill 707
Recommendation:
That
the
City
Council
adopt
City
Council
Policy
CP-26-01
approving
the
procedures
for
recessing
and
reconvening
its
meetings
in
the
event
of
a
disruption
in
telephonic
or internet services during an open and public meeting.
9. Consultant/Professional
Services
Agreement
with
Besst,
Inc.
for
Hydrogeological
Services for Well 109
Recommendation:
That the Honorable Victorville Water District Board of Directors (Board):
(1)
Find
that
Besst,
Inc.
is
the
sole
provider
for
Well
Profiling
and
Modification
(Hydrogeological
Services)
and
a
sole
source
is
approved
in
accordance
with VMC 2.28.100(b)(2); and
(2)
Approve
the
Consultant/Professional
Services
Agreement
with
Besst,
Inc.,
Project CFC26-127.
10. Law
Enforcement
Contract
#94-909-A-56,
Memorandum
of
Understanding
with
the
Victor
Elementary
School
District
to
Fund
School
Resource
Officers,
and
Agreement between the City of Victorville and Macerich Victor Valley, LP
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1)
Approve
the
Fifty-Sixth
Amendment
to
Law
Enforcement
Contract
#94-909-
A-56
for
the
period
of
July
1,
2026,
through
June
30,
2027,
and
authorize
the
Mayor or her designee to process all documents required for this agreement; (2)
Approve
the
Memorandum
of
Understanding
by
and
between
the
City
of
Victorville
and
the
Victor
Elementary
School
District
for
the
same
period
to
fund
School
Resource
Officers
and
authorize
the
City
Manager
or
his
designee to process all documents required for this agreement; and (3)
Approve
the
agreement
by
and
between
the
City
of
Victorville
and
Macerich
Victor
Valley,
LP
for
one
Deputy
and
authorize
the
City
Manager
or
his
designee to process all documents required for this agreement.
11. Purchase of a Type-1 Pierce Pumper Under Cab Engine
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve the purchase of a Type-1 Pierce Engine from South Coast Fire Equipment in the amount not to exceed $1,300,000; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents necessary to purchase one (1) Type-1 Fire Apparatus.
12. Measure P Oversight Committee Membership
Recommendation:
That
the
Honorable
City
Council
reaffirms
the
following
members
to
the
Measure
P
Oversight Committee, extending their appointment for an additional four years:
•
Cynthia Coello, Resident Member of Local Major Retail Industry •
Joel Counts, Resident Member of Clergy
•
Vince Onken, Resident Member of Non-Profit Social Services Provider
13. Housing
and
Homelessness
Incentive
Program
2026
-
Agreement
with
San
Bernardino County
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1)
Adopt
Resolution
No.
26-045
accepting
the
Housing
and
Homelessness
Incentive
Program
(HHIP)
2026
grant
funding
in
the
amount
of
$500,000
to
support
the
fiscal
sustainability
of
the
Victorville
Wellness
Center,
supportive
case management, and assist with homelessness prevention; (2)
Authorize
the
City
Manager
or
his
designee
to
finalize
all
documents
needed
to execute the HHIP 2026 contract and administer the overall project; (3)
Authorize
the
City
Manager
or
his
designee
to
make
any
necessary
amendments
to
the
contract
in
as
deemed
necessary
by
San
Bernardino
County or the City Attorney; and
(4)
Adopt
Resolution
No.
26-046
amending
the
annual
budget
for
fiscal
year
2025-
2026
to
appropriate
and
authorize
expenditure
of
an
additional
$500,000.
14. Community
Cleanup
and
Employment
Pathway
Grant
-
Agreement
with
the
California
Department
of
Transportation
for
the
City
of
Victorville’s
Old
Town
Beautification and Workforce Empowerment Initiative
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1)
Adopt
Resolution
No.
26-047
accepting
Community
Cleanup
and
Employment
Pathway
(CCEP)
Grant
funding
in
the
amount
of
$300,000.00
to
support
a
City
Old
Town
Beautification
and
Workforce
Empowerment
Initiative
focusing
on
litter
abatement
and
public
space
beautification
within
the
public
right-of-way,
while
creating
workforce
development
opportunities
for Wellness Center clients facing barriers to employment; (2)
Authorize
the
City
Manager
or
his
designee
to
finalize
all
documents
needed
to execute the CCEP contract and administer the overall project; (3)
Authorize
the
City
Manager
or
his
designee
to
make
any
necessary
amendments
to
the
contract
as
deemed
necessary
by
the
California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) or the City Attorney; and (4)
Adopt
Resolution
No.
26-048
amending
the
annual
budget
for
fiscal
year
2025-
2026
to
reflect
an
additional
appropriation
in
the
amount
of
$300,000.00.
15. Letter of Support – CONFIRE Grant Application for Safe Streets and Roads for All
Recommendation:
That
Your
Honorable
City
Council
authorize
the
Mayor
to
sign
a
letter
of
support
for
CONFIRE’s grant application for Safe Streets and Roads for All.
16. City Manager Reports
17. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Upcoming Agenda Items
18. Reports from Council Members
Adjournment
Item Number: 1
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: May 19, 2026
Submitted By:
Fredy Bonilla, City Engineer
Subject:
Reduction of Securities for Tract Map Nos. 16808-1 through 7 Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve the 80-percent release of the Water and Sewer Faithful Performance Securities;
(2) Approve the full release of the Monumentation Faithful Performance Improvement Security; and
(3) Accept the completed water and sewer improvements.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with “Goal E- Invest in Infrastructure” in the City of Victorville Strategic Plan 2023-2026. Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, the City applies the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community’s needs.
Background:
Tract Map No. 16808-1 through 7 (hereinafter “Tract 16808”) constitute a residential subdivision of 241 single-family lots, located at the southeast corner of Nyack Road and Mesa View Drive. On September 7, 2021, the City entered into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA), secured by improvement bonds, with Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc (developer). The SIA required the developer to complete the outstanding public improvements for Phases 1 through 7, as the tract was only partially developed prior to the Great Recession. The conditions of approval required that the developer complete various infrastructure components, including water, 4 6
2 3
drainage, sewer, streets, and monumentation. Since that time, the developer has made significant progress in completing the development of the tract.
Discussion:
The developer has met the conditions of approval and has successfully completed all the requirements for the water and sewer public improvements. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council approve an 80-percent reduction of the Water and Sewer Faithful Performance Securities in accordance with Victorville Municipal Code (VMC) Section
17.64.070(1), as well as accept the completed water and sewer improvements. The remaining 20-percent of the Faithful Performance Securities will be held for the one-year warranty period, in accordance with VMC Section 17.64.070(4).
Additionally, the required monumentation for the entire tract has been completed.
Monumentation of a tract is the process of placing markers on a surveyed area of land to determine the boundaries of the tract. Monumentation also includes the points of street centerline and right-of-way intersections, the beginning and end of curves, and lot/parcel corners. The engineer of record for Tract Nos. 16808-1 through 7 has completed the required monumentation and has received full payment from the developer. Therefore, it is recommended that the monumentation security be released in its entirety.
Staff is available for any questions Council may have.
Prepared By:
Nicoale Sylvestre, Management Specialist
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Securities Table
C. Existing Securities
Attachment A
Vicinity Map
TRACT 16808
VICINITY MAP
APPLE VAllEY
____ .,,
VICTORVILL£
MOJAVE DR.
LOCATION
I
I
I r--
'----
OK
'-7-1 EUCAL YP TUS ST. � CITY LIMITS f - �
',
HESPERIA
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
5 Item Number: 2
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: May 19, 2026
Submitted By:
Fredy Bonilla, City Engineer
Subject:
Reduction of Securities for Tract Map No. 20274
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council approve the full release of the Water, Drainage, and Sewer Labor and Material Securities for Tract Map No. 20274.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact resulting from this action.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Goal E: “Invest in Infrastructure” in the City of Victorville Strategic Plan 2023-2026. Although this is not a Capital Improvement Project, the City applies the same strategy to private development projects as they are essential in meeting the community’s needs.
Background:
Tract No. 20274 (referred to as Tract 20274) is a 168-lot single family residential subdivision located north of Eucalyptus Road, east of Amethyst Road, south of Sycamore Street, and west of Amargosa Road. On September 15, 2020, the developer KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. (KB Homes), entered into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA). The conditions of approval for the tract required the developer to complete several infrastructure components, including water, drainage, sewer, street, Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD), and monumentation improvements. The developer has made significant progress in the development of the tract and at the regularly scheduled City Council meeting held on November 18, 2025, City Council approved and accepted the water, drainage, and sewer public improvements.
4 6
8 7
Discussion:
Per Victorville Municipal Code Section 17.64.070(3), the Labor and Materials Securities were held for a six-month period to allow subcontractors that have furnished labor, materials, or equipment, to file a claim for payment. Because the improvements were accepted by the City Council at its November 18, 2025 regular City Council meeting, and no claims have been filed during the required holding period, staff recommends the full release of the Water, Drainage and Sewer Public Improvement Labor and Materials Securities.
Staff is available for any questions Council may have.
Prepared By:
Nicoale Sylvestre, Management Specialist
Attachments: A. Vicinity Map
B. Securities Table
C. Existing Securities
Attachment B
Securities Table
Securities Table
Water, Drainage, Sewer, Street, LMAD and Monumentation
Faithful Performance Security
Water Improvements – No. 024244188 Labor & Materials Security Water Improvements – No. 024244188
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $1,146,997.50 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $573,498.75 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $229,399.50 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $573,498.75 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $573,498.75 Amount of Security REMAINING: $229,399.50 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Faithful Performance Security
Drainage Improvements – No. 024244188 Labor & Materials Security Drainage Improvements – No. 024244188
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $1,067,070.48 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $533,535.24 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $213,414.10 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $533,535.24 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $533,535.24 Amount of Security REMAINING: $213,414.10 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Faithful Performance Security
Sewer Improvements – No. 024244188 Labor & Materials Security Sewer Improvements – No. 024244188
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $1,362,372.00 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $681,186.00 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $272,474.40 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $681,186.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $681,186.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $272,474.40 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Faithful Performance Security
Street Improvements – No. 024244188 Labor & Materials Security Street Improvements – No. 024244188
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $3,303,649.31 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $1,651,824.66 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $1,321,459.72 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $1,651,824.66 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $1,321,459.72 Amount of Security REMAINING: $1,651,824.66
Securities Table
Water, Drainage, Sewer, Street, LMAD and Monumentation
Developer:
KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc.
36310 Inland Valley Drive Suite 300
Wildomar, Ca 92595
Faithful Performance Security
LMAD Improvements – No. 024247081 Labor & Materials Security LMAD Improvements – No. 024247081
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $223,932.94 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $111,966.47 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $44,786.59 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $44,786.59 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00 Faithful Performance Security
Monumentation Improvements - No. 024244188 Labor & Materials Security Monumentation Improvements – No. 024244188
Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $31,679.65 Amount of ORIGINAL Security: $31,680.06 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $31,679.65 Amount of Security CURRENTLY: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security being REDUCED: $0.00 Amount of Security REMAINING: $31,679.65 Amount of Security REMAINING: $0.00
lcAUFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT c1v1L CODE §1189 I A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of Los Angeles
SEP O 2 2020 On ________ before me, R.Rangel, Notary Public, personally appeared Brenda Wong who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/�subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that Re/she/tRe-y executed the same in h½s/her/tA-eff: authorized capacity{¼es}, and that by h½s/her/the+f-signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(seal) Signature �, �
R. Rangel� Public
Item Number: 3
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: May 19, 2026
Submitted By:
Carmen Cun, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Commercial Demand Schedule No. 22
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Commercial Demand Schedule No. 22 for the period of April 16, 2026, through April 29, 2026, in total amount of $13,367,888.94.
This total includes:
• Electronic Fund Transfers No. 349023 through 349258 and Warrant No. 803571 through 803723 in the amount of $10,978,163.10.
• Wire Transfers in the amount of $2,389,725.84.
All are consistent with the adopted Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget (covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
Fiscal Impact:
The total fiscal impact of $13,367,888.94 is authorized with this action. The attached report details the total funds paid to vendors.
Background:
Pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code (2.24.080) the attached demands were presented by the departments, audited by the Finance Department and subsequent warrants/wire transfers were issued. All were found to be in conformity to City policies and procedures and funds were budgeted or available to pay said demands. A list of commercial warrants and wire transfers is now being presented to the City Council for approval.
Prepared By:
Andrew Gonzalez, Senior Account Clerk
Attachments: A. Commercial Demand Schedule No. 22 Check Register Summary
ATTACHMENT A:
Commercial Demand
Schedule No. 22 Check
Register Summary
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 04/29/2026 14:55
User: avgonzalez
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 349023 04/22/2026 EFT 016204 4LEAF, INC. 13,677.75 349024 04/22/2026 EFT 021302 AAA CONTAINER SALES AND R 174.00 349025 04/22/2026 EFT 014305 ALBERT A .WEBB ASSOCIATES 22,471.11 349026 04/22/2026 EFT 022097 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, 1,933.97 349027 04/22/2026 EFT 003042 APPLE VALLEY COMMUNICATIO 232.50 349028 04/22/2026 EFT 000297 BECK OIL, INC. 38,092.16 349029 04/22/2026 EFT 022994 BLUE-WHITE INDUSTRIES 26,247.90 349030 04/22/2026 EFT 014820 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS 1,193.12 349031 04/22/2026 EFT 023717 IDENTISYS INCORPORATED 1,427.00 349032 04/22/2026 EFT 015486 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL D 168.23 349033 04/22/2026 EFT 023070 C. WELLS PIPELINE MATERIA 2,610.00 349034 04/22/2026 EFT 006348 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION 695.24 349035 04/22/2026 EFT 006331 DELAFIELD CORP 386.75 349036 04/22/2026 EFT 000743 DELL MARKETING L.P. 60,044.68 349037 04/22/2026 EFT 022345 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SER 112.29 349038 04/22/2026 EFT 012800 DKF SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC 4,495.00 349039 04/22/2026 EFT 005295 DOKKEN ENGINEERING 7,580.00 349040 04/22/2026 EFT 030521 EDF INC. 31,577.33 349041 04/22/2026 EFT 023177 ESTRADA, MIGUEL A. 19,000.00 349042 04/22/2026 EFT 017560 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 88.65 349043 04/22/2026 EFT 017560 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 5,133.00 349044 04/22/2026 EFT 005127 FLIGHT LIGHT, INC. 1,709.02 349045 04/22/2026 EFT 011206 FLYERS ENERGY LLC 2,303.14 349046 04/22/2026 EFT 000975 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS, INC 19.94 349047 04/22/2026 EFT 023898 G & M AUTOMOTIVE CENTER, 1,020.00 349048 04/22/2026 EFT 001740 G.A. OSBORNE PIPE-SUPPLY 245.93 349049 04/22/2026 EFT 000031 GARCIA, JOHN 1,084.36 349050 04/22/2026 EFT 001063 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 8,441.48 349051 04/22/2026 EFT 001076 GRAINGER 9,840.70 349052 04/22/2026 EFT 006269 GREEN, DE BORTNOWSKY, LLP 90,253.41 349053 04/22/2026 EFT 001104 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 330.22 349054 04/22/2026 EFT 018938 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3,450.37 349055 04/22/2026 EFT 021594 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 4,102.36 349056 04/22/2026 EFT 028225 HESPERIA OUTDOOR POWER EQ 409.05 349057 04/22/2026 EFT 000278 BELL MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES 65.00 349058 04/22/2026 EFT 001178 HI-GRADE MATERIALS 1,946.13 349059 04/22/2026 EFT 010777 ICONIX WATERWORKS (US) IN 97.34 349060 04/22/2026 EFT 024922 INFOSEND, INC 125.41 349061 04/22/2026 EFT 022001 KERN RIVER GAS TRANSMISSI 4,340.00 349062 04/22/2026 EFT 004986 LESLIE'S SWIMMING POOL SU 231.51 349063 04/22/2026 EFT 022659 LIGHTNING STEP TECHNOLOGI 3,950.00 349064 04/22/2026 EFT 005674 MERRELL JOHNSON ENGINEERI 17,014.00 349065 04/22/2026 EFT 001592 MOBILE OCCUPATIONAL SERVI 90.00 349066 04/22/2026 EFT 019967 MOJAVE AUTO COLLISION 12,462.24 349067 04/22/2026 EFT 001595 MOJAVE BASIN AREA WATERMA 31,029.66 349068 04/22/2026 EFT 001603 MOJAVE WATER AGENCY 61,560.00 349069 04/22/2026 EFT 023907 MUSIJ, SERGIO ALEJANDRO 20,000.00 349070 04/22/2026 EFT 014011 MYERS AND SONS HI-WAY SAF 3,981.74 349071 04/22/2026 EFT 024434 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 73.13 349072 04/22/2026 EFT 028462 NINYO & MOORE GEOTECHNICA 5,434.30 349073 04/22/2026 EFT 028213 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 36.67 349074 04/22/2026 EFT 024224 PROACTIVE WORK HEALTH MED 980.00
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 04/29/2026 14:55
User: avgonzalez
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 349075 04/22/2026 EFT 001886 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 603.02 349076 04/22/2026 EFT 018886 RDO EQUIPMENT CO. 159.60 349077 04/22/2026 EFT 020678 UNITED SAFETY SERVICES 32.57 349078 04/22/2026 EFT 002746 ROTO ROOTER PLUMBERS 3,659.72 349079 04/22/2026 EFT 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 20,446.00 349080 04/22/2026 EFT 002123 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY 230.28 349081 04/22/2026 EFT 014914 ULINE SHIPPING SUPPLY SPE 1,370.17 349082 04/22/2026 EFT 000095 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC. 516.68 349083 04/22/2026 EFT 020762 OREMOR OF VICTORVILLE, LL 264.24 349084 04/22/2026 EFT 024612 VISION SERVICE PLAN 6,133.82 349085 04/22/2026 EFT 008430 CALMAT COMPANY 675.92 349086 04/22/2026 EFT 002554 WAXIE'S ENTERPRISES, LLC, 5,178.25 349087 04/22/2026 EFT 023221 JOVENVILLE, LLC 7,795.00 349088 04/22/2026 EFT 022033 WOODARD & CURRAN, INC. 18,382.07 349089 04/22/2026 EFT 018845 Z GLOBAL INC. 167,974.79 349090 04/29/2026 EFT 016204 4LEAF, INC. 14,997.33 349091 04/29/2026 EFT 000004 LITTLEFIELD, DAVID S. 1,425.00 349092 04/29/2026 EFT 000104 DANTIN ENTERPRISES, INC. 675.00 349093 04/29/2026 EFT 022097 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, 2,825.68 349094 04/29/2026 EFT 024216 AMERICAN GLOBAL SECURITY, 12,754.69 349095 04/29/2026 EFT 002921 AMERICAN LANDSCAPE AND MA 62,600.87 349096 04/29/2026 EFT 000165 ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC 467.00 349097 04/29/2026 EFT 003042 APPLE VALLEY COMMUNICATIO 23,666.42 349098 04/29/2026 EFT 017968 AVCOM SERVICES, INC. 1,025.00 349099 04/29/2026 EFT 024059 BALFOUR BEATTY INFRASTRUC 1,464.00 349100 04/29/2026 EFT 000297 BECK OIL, INC. 26,750.50 349101 04/29/2026 EFT 016222 CACEO 100.00 349102 04/29/2026 EFT 014820 CAL-STATE AUTO PARTS 1,896.75 349103 04/29/2026 EFT 018132 CLINICAL LABORATORY OF SA 8,142.00 349104 04/29/2026 EFT 015486 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL D 182.60 349105 04/29/2026 EFT 023070 C. WELLS PIPELINE MATERIA 8,156.25 349106 04/29/2026 EFT 010282 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE CO 4,716.48 349107 04/29/2026 EFT 009492 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNI 35,155.45 349108 04/29/2026 EFT 000826 DUNN-EDWARDS CORPORATION 2,951.35 349109 04/29/2026 EFT 024027 EAGLESHIELD PEST CONTROL, 1,485.00 349110 04/29/2026 EFT 019731 EL DORADO BROADCASTERS LL 1,794.00 349111 04/29/2026 EFT 014122 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL 443.32 349112 04/29/2026 EFT 015760 FASTENAL COMPANY 395.38 349113 04/29/2026 EFT 020330 FENAGH, LLC 1,150.25 349114 04/29/2026 EFT 017560 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 41.80 349115 04/29/2026 EFT 000975 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS, INC 162.67 349116 04/29/2026 EFT 016134 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS C 434.32 349117 04/29/2026 EFT 022275 GASKELL TEP LLC 102,004.17 349118 04/29/2026 EFT 001063 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 2,313.01 349119 04/29/2026 EFT 001076 GRAINGER 84.99 349120 04/29/2026 EFT 023053 SPARKS, STEPHANIE VICTORI 256.00 349121 04/29/2026 EFT 001104 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 98.15 349122 04/29/2026 EFT 021166 HARKEY, DAWN MARIE 150.00 349123 04/29/2026 EFT 028225 HESPERIA OUTDOOR POWER EQ 370.65 349124 04/29/2026 EFT 013759 HINDMAN, RICHARD 70.00 349125 04/29/2026 EFT 001059 JOE A. GONSALVES & SON 3,500.00 349126 04/29/2026 EFT 000226 LARRY WALKER ASSOCIATES, 11,347.00
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 04/29/2026 14:55
User: avgonzalez
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 349127 04/29/2026 EFT 017751 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATION 3,248.25 349128 04/29/2026 EFT 019967 MOJAVE AUTO COLLISION 160.00 349129 04/29/2026 EFT 001595 MOJAVE BASIN AREA WATERMA 1,630,590.00 349130 04/29/2026 EFT 022000 MOJAVE RESOURCE MANAGEMEN 31,466.00 349131 04/29/2026 EFT 001603 MOJAVE WATER AGENCY 56,088.00 349132 04/29/2026 EFT 016352 MONTGOMERY, ROGER 350.00 349133 04/29/2026 EFT 024434 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2,520.60 349134 04/29/2026 EFT 028462 NINYO & MOORE GEOTECHNICA 49,784.73 349135 04/29/2026 EFT 009644 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY I 236.53 349136 04/29/2026 EFT 014835 OMNIS INCORPORATED 13,010.00 349137 04/29/2026 EFT 024517 OUT-FIT, A CALIFORNIA COR 29,418.52 349138 04/29/2026 EFT 013165 PETE'S ROAD SERVICE 53.61 349139 04/29/2026 EFT 024224 PROACTIVE WORK HEALTH MED 1,570.00 349140 04/29/2026 EFT 001886 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 1,482.86 349141 04/29/2026 EFT 018886 RDO EQUIPMENT CO. 52,772.28 349142 04/29/2026 EFT 003857 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC. 326.98 349143 04/29/2026 EFT 002746 ROTO ROOTER PLUMBERS 7,286.00 349144 04/29/2026 EFT 020899 RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF CAL 45.10 349145 04/29/2026 EFT 002017 SAFEWAY SIGN CO. 4,865.48 349146 04/29/2026 EFT 002063 SBC FIRE DEPARTMENT 2,404.00 349147 04/29/2026 EFT 002123 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY 859.07 349148 04/29/2026 EFT 018883 MOMAR, INC. 173.97 349149 04/29/2026 EFT 017269 TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE INC 140.00 349150 04/29/2026 EFT 003089 UNITED RENTALS, INC. 219.63 349151 04/29/2026 EFT 014536 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF C 1,071.41 349152 04/29/2026 EFT 020421 VOHNE LICHE KENNELS, INC. 400.00 349153 04/29/2026 EFT 008430 CALMAT COMPANY 305.03 349154 04/29/2026 EFT 024215 AVNI ENTERPRISES, INC. 1,045.62 349155 04/29/2026 EFT 018301 WESTERN WATER WORKS SUPPL 42,412.50 349156 04/29/2026 EFT 018845 Z GLOBAL INC. 11,036.21 349157 04/29/2026 EFT 005004 ABREGO, RODOLFO RUDY 164.99 349158 04/29/2026 EFT 014212 ALDERETE, EVONIA 584.50 349159 04/29/2026 EFT 011930 ANDERSON, PAMELA K 571.04 349160 04/29/2026 EFT 011756 ANDRETTI, SANDRA 580.61 349161 04/29/2026 EFT 004157 ARMSTRONG, DANA 385.41 349162 04/29/2026 EFT 019717 ARROYO, JOANN 377.23 349163 04/29/2026 EFT 003638 BECERRA, ELIZABETH 836.91 349164 04/29/2026 EFT 012054 BECKER, JOHN R 445.16 349165 04/29/2026 EFT 014654 BEVILACQUA, ANTHONY 584.50 349166 04/29/2026 EFT 011916 BIER, MICHAEL 562.87 349167 04/29/2026 EFT 018689 BORROWMAN, STEVEN H. 919.00 349168 04/29/2026 EFT 012066 BROWN, MARTY R 584.50 349169 04/29/2026 EFT 012044 BURCHAK, GLORIA J 556.32 349170 04/29/2026 EFT 006940 CALDERON, CELESTE 477.24 349171 04/29/2026 EFT 012056 CALDWELL, TERRY E 453.34 349172 04/29/2026 EFT 001114 CAMELI-STEVENS, LORAINE 162.44 349173 04/29/2026 EFT 003218 CARBAJAL, STEVEN 221.82 349174 04/29/2026 EFT 025314 CASTRO, MELISSA 400.29 349175 04/29/2026 EFT 003645 CATHCART, MICHAEL 697.57 349176 04/29/2026 EFT 004144 CHRISTIAN-SOPER, BARBARA 323.57 349177 04/29/2026 EFT 008111 COLLINS, KEVIN 639.02 349178 04/29/2026 EFT 011935 COSTELLO, JOSE 124.44
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 04/29/2026 14:55
User: avgonzalez
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 349179 04/29/2026 EFT 011934 COX, JAMES L 522.32 349180 04/29/2026 EFT 012051 COX, JOHN STEVEN 73.24 349181 04/29/2026 EFT 012064 COY, MICHAEL 278.79 349182 04/29/2026 EFT 012069 DEZWART, AMY LYN 556.32 349183 04/29/2026 EFT 006095 DIAZ, JANET 592.13 349184 04/29/2026 EFT 009544 FALZONE, RICHARD 280.54 349185 04/29/2026 EFT 012046 FITZSIMMONS, RALPH L 85.38 349186 04/29/2026 EFT 004773 FLORES, JOSEPH P. 152.84 349187 04/29/2026 EFT 014881 GARCIA, ERNIE 164.99 349188 04/29/2026 EFT 011940 GARCIA, VINCENT J 820.56 349189 04/29/2026 EFT 011909 GARLAND, SHEILA D 338.11 349190 04/29/2026 EFT 015665 HELDRETH, GREGORY 919.00 349191 04/29/2026 EFT 012052 HINOJOS, JANICE A 400.29 349192 04/29/2026 EFT 012067 HOFFMAN, KATHLENE 8.21 349193 04/29/2026 EFT 011677 HOLLAND, KELLEY 341.35 349194 04/29/2026 EFT 011385 JAMES, CHRISTINA 591.96 349195 04/29/2026 EFT 012050 JARRETT, JENNIE L 488.39 349196 04/29/2026 EFT 022215 KARRES, RONALD J. 390.07 349197 04/29/2026 EFT 012049 KUHLMANN, EULEMA 159.65 349198 04/29/2026 EFT 029000 LACEY, MICHAEL P. 81.07 349199 04/29/2026 EFT 014183 LAURIE, BERNEE 225.96 349200 04/29/2026 EFT 012061 LAWSON, JAMES 836.91 349201 04/29/2026 EFT 012047 LEEF, DAVID 445.16 349202 04/29/2026 EFT 006502 LEWIS, ROBERT 161.26 349203 04/29/2026 EFT 009048 LUDWIG, TRACY 632.33 349204 04/29/2026 EFT 012060 MADDOX, JONNIE F 584.50 349205 04/29/2026 EFT 019440 MCCORMICK, DONNA 874.59 349206 04/29/2026 EFT 014184 MCGINN, JOHN 881.68 349207 04/29/2026 EFT 011918 MCGLADE, JOHN A 319.09 349208 04/29/2026 EFT 004588 MCGOWAN, CHERYL 275.83 349209 04/29/2026 EFT 003603 MCMURTRY, DANIEL 847.52 349210 04/29/2026 EFT 011913 MILLENDER, FRANCENE J 645.79 349211 04/29/2026 EFT 003597 MILLENDER, JOSEPH 944.87 349212 04/29/2026 EFT 004745 MILLER, BRUCE 43.41 349213 04/29/2026 EFT 011917 MORSE, RENEE 571.04 349214 04/29/2026 EFT 012070 MOSHER, ADELE 189.57 349215 04/29/2026 EFT 012426 MULLINS, DENNIS M. 376.11 349216 04/29/2026 EFT 012065 NEWELL, CAROLYN 578.03 349217 04/29/2026 EFT 003200 O'DELL, DARRELL 155.87 349218 04/29/2026 EFT 013672 OGILVIE-HARPER, MARQUITA 149.27 349219 04/29/2026 EFT 012697 OROS, DWAYNE E. 888.05 349220 04/29/2026 EFT 012057 PATTERSON, ADAIR MARIE 571.04 349221 04/29/2026 EFT 022185 PIEPER, WADE 888.05 349222 04/29/2026 EFT 020717 PRUEITT, CORINNE 875.96 349223 04/29/2026 EFT 020716 PRUEITT, DAVID 262.93 349224 04/29/2026 EFT 011910 RAMIREZ, DIANA M 127.82 349225 04/29/2026 EFT 018894 RANDALL, DAVID L. 136.49 349226 04/29/2026 EFT 011920 RANKIN, SHARON 338.11 349227 04/29/2026 EFT 013209 RANKIN, TIMOTHY 856.82 349228 04/29/2026 EFT 020907 RODRIGUEZ, ANGELA 363.00 349229 04/29/2026 EFT 014496 RODRIGUEZ, LOUIE 847.52 349230 04/29/2026 EFT 017345 RUSSO, MARILEE 105.64
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 04/29/2026 14:55
User: avgonzalez
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 349231 04/29/2026 EFT 003583 RUSSO, VINCE 217.79 349232 04/29/2026 EFT 014493 SALAS, GLENN 148.19 349233 04/29/2026 EFT 012045 SALBERG, RAYMOND A 393.95 349234 04/29/2026 EFT 011929 SALINAS SR., XAVIER S 338.11 349235 04/29/2026 EFT 011086 SANCHEZ, TERESA 506.45 349236 04/29/2026 EFT 019830 SARABIA, GILBERTO 19.67 349237 04/29/2026 EFT 017488 SCHROEDER, KAY D. 522.32 349238 04/29/2026 EFT 014082 SMITH, ARNOLD 97.42 349239 04/29/2026 EFT 011900 SMITH, DAVID SCOTT 585.80 349240 04/29/2026 EFT 005413 SMITH, SOPHIE L. 593.97 349241 04/29/2026 EFT 011931 SONGER FAMILY SURVIVAL TR 584.50 349242 04/29/2026 EFT 024654 SPARKS, DAVID J. 338.11 349243 04/29/2026 EFT 005559 ST. LOUIS, LINDA 919.00 349244 04/29/2026 EFT 018887 STONESIFER, ROBERT 159.65 349245 04/29/2026 EFT 021852 STONESIFER, BARRY 400.29 349246 04/29/2026 EFT 012949 STRATTON, DANIEL 186.62 349247 04/29/2026 EFT 017153 SZARZYNSKI, MICHAEL J. 328.75 349248 04/29/2026 EFT 021025 TAYLOR, SHARON 404.42 349249 04/29/2026 EFT 012078 THOMASSON, PHILLIP 626.19 349250 04/29/2026 EFT 001993 TREVINO,JOSEFINA 629.44 349251 04/29/2026 EFT 004839 TUCKER, MITCHELL 444.97 349252 04/29/2026 EFT 014806 WASSERMAN, REBECCA A 136.49 349253 04/29/2026 EFT 019160 WEAVER, STUART 888.05 349254 04/29/2026 EFT 013671 WEBB, WILLIAM C 364.99 349255 04/29/2026 EFT 011915 WHITE, JAMES M 584.50 349256 04/29/2026 EFT 011924 WILSON, BOBBY G 378.66 349257 04/29/2026 EFT 012958 WOLTERS, MARCELLA 156.98 349258 04/29/2026 EFT 012059 ZIZZI, WARREN J 779.66 803571 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024427 ACTION RESEARCH 11,437.20 803572 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024821 ALPHA OMEGA SEPTIC SERVIC 489.00 803573 04/22/2026 PRINTED 000177 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT & S 1,032.61 803574 04/22/2026 PRINTED 000174 APEX RENTAL 1,034.72 803575 04/22/2026 PRINTED 017680 AUTOZONE, INC. 277.33 803576 04/22/2026 PRINTED 999974 BEAR VALLEY RD AND 2ND AV 8,184.00 803577 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024693 BATTERY UNIVERSE SALES LL 130.47 803578 04/22/2026 PRINTED 023585 BLUSKY RESTORATION CONTRA 15,237.15 803579 04/22/2026 PRINTED 017353 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 1,132.73 803580 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024102 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, 187,100.66 803581 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024102 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, 3,346.71 803582 04/22/2026 PRINTED 017562 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. 300.00 803583 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024690 CAL VALVE INC. 2,681.58 803584 04/22/2026 PRINTED 020755 MIKE CAPOSIO BUICK GMC, L 53.62 803585 04/22/2026 PRINTED 017796 DAN'S LAWNMOWER CENTER 1,108.94 803586 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024744 PASADENA CONSULTING GROUP 2,600.00 803587 04/22/2026 PRINTED 022422 ERNIE'S AUTO SERVICE CORP 436.07 803588 04/22/2026 PRINTED 021939 EXAMINETICS, INC. 3,040.00 803589 04/22/2026 PRINTED 021303 FACILITRON, INC. 7,500.00 803590 04/22/2026 PRINTED 016744 FAMILY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 58,411.68 803591 04/22/2026 PRINTED 000346 FELIX, MARIO 175.00 803592 04/22/2026 PRINTED 004581 FLEETPRIDE 391.92 803593 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024758 GABRIEL, ERIK ELIZAID 17.27 803594 04/22/2026 PRINTED 020022 GREATER HIGH DESERT CHAMB 1,033.13
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 04/29/2026 14:55
User: avgonzalez
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 803595 04/22/2026 PRINTED 011740 GUZMAN, HECTOR 357.00 803596 04/22/2026 PRINTED 001155 HESPERIA HOSE SUPPLY 203.35 803597 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024536 DRS AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC 4,655.41 803598 04/22/2026 PRINTED 023338 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BER 532.00 803599 04/22/2026 PRINTED 022573 HYDROTEK INDUSTRIES 350.00 803600 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024659 INLAND KENWORTH (US) INC. 111.69 803601 04/22/2026 PRINTED 023465 JUSTO, FELIPE 314.36 803602 04/22/2026 PRINTED 022774 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 7,250.00 803603 04/22/2026 PRINTED 017054 LOOPNET, INC. 262.00 803604 04/22/2026 PRINTED 023756 MACIAS, CANDY 686.91 803605 04/22/2026 PRINTED 021856 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURAN 2,034.25 803606 04/22/2026 PRINTED 023678 MGT IMPACT SOLUTIONS, LLC 1,946.06 803607 04/22/2026 PRINTED 023015 MONET CONSTRUCTION, INC. 49,803.64 803608 04/22/2026 PRINTED 010657 PACIFIC PRODUCTS & SERVIC 3,843.69 803609 04/22/2026 PRINTED 021481 VELASCO,JOSEPH 672.39 803610 04/22/2026 PRINTED 014355 QUINN COMPANY 510.77 803611 04/22/2026 PRINTED 003150 ROBERTSON'S 828.81 803612 04/22/2026 PRINTED 002037 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 26.00 803613 04/22/2026 PRINTED 002071 SAN BERNARDINO CO SOLID W 300,652.89 803614 04/22/2026 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 88,725.98 803615 04/22/2026 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 52,333.85 803616 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024609 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG 834.97 803617 04/22/2026 PRINTED 002236 STATE WATER RESOURCES CON 4,212.00 803618 04/22/2026 PRINTED 002204 SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION 3,695.58 803619 04/22/2026 PRINTED 015430 TRI-PACIFIC SUPPLY, INC. 2,326.84 803620 04/22/2026 PRINTED 015840 ULTIMATE TINT & WHEEL 80.00 803621 04/22/2026 PRINTED 019542 URBAN FUTURES INC. 2,450.00 803622 04/22/2026 PRINTED 022788 USA TODAY MEDIA CORP FKA 1,401.56 803623 04/22/2026 PRINTED 022706 RED BARN MEDIA, INC. 1,179.00 803624 04/22/2026 PRINTED 002786 VANCE CORP. 955,114.75 803625 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024745 VASQUEZ, ISSAC 1,075.00 803626 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024443 VERTEX CIVIL 561.66 803627 04/22/2026 PRINTED 999995 WOJCIECHOWSKI, KYLE 5,000.00 803628 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024546 WALLACE GROUP, A CALIFORN 37,300.75 803629 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024754 AEROSTAR LLC 417.87 803630 04/22/2026 PRINTED 017405 CHOWDHURY, NURUZZAMAN 15.33 803631 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024755 FENAGH ENGINEERING AND TE 417.87 803632 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024749 GOMEZ, ELOISA CHAVEZ 96.79 803633 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024753 KONG, JULIE MIN CHU 21.92 803634 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024759 MC FANN, JOSEPH E 41.58 803635 04/22/2026 PRINTED 008497 MODY, VATSAL H 107.72 803636 04/22/2026 PRINTED 017515 RIVERA, ANGELA L 14.02 803637 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024757 SCHUSTER, PHILIP J 1,910.00 803638 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024750 TELLEZ, FRANCISCO J. 30.22 803639 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024748 TST CONSTRUCTION, INC 100.98 803640 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024756 WFG NATIONAL TITLE CO OF 91.34 803641 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024751 WONG, JADE 23.62 803642 04/22/2026 PRINTED 024752 WOODARD LIVING TRUST 10-6 30.22 803643 04/29/2026 PRINTED 024747 3 WEST ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 1,150.00 803644 04/29/2026 PRINTED 023403 GONZALEZ PARTY & EVENT RE 1,755.00 803645 04/29/2026 PRINTED 019379 ADES, JOHN AND DEVON 8,400.00 803646 04/29/2026 PRINTED 006416 ANTONY ANIMAL HOSPITAL 640.00
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 04/29/2026 14:55
User: avgonzalez
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 803647 04/29/2026 PRINTED 000174 APEX RENTAL 1,520.90 803648 04/29/2026 PRINTED 000191 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH 51.23 803649 04/29/2026 PRINTED 017819 ANIMAL HOSPITAL AT THE NA 80.00 803650 04/29/2026 PRINTED 011807 BASTIANON,REMO E 19,950.00 803651 04/29/2026 PRINTED 000290 BATTERY MART OF APPLE VAL 287.54 803652 04/29/2026 PRINTED 023067 BEAR VALLEY ANIMAL HOSPIT 560.00 803653 04/29/2026 PRINTED 019378 BEINSCHROTH, ANDY 65,625.00 803654 04/29/2026 PRINTED 024274 BRINC DRONES, INC. 277,309.73 803655 04/29/2026 PRINTED 013997 BROWN, JENNIFER 9,975.00 803656 04/29/2026 PRINTED 011809 BRYANT, IAN 10,500.00 803657 04/29/2026 PRINTED 024102 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, 3,015.85 803658 04/29/2026 PRINTED 017822 CALDERON, NICK 322.00 803659 04/29/2026 PRINTED 000406 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF 725.00 803660 04/29/2026 PRINTED 000618 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC. 90.52 803661 04/29/2026 PRINTED 000155 CENTURY LINK 446.20 803662 04/29/2026 PRINTED 016335 CHARTER COMMUNICATION HOL 5,464.32 803663 04/29/2026 PRINTED 014359 CIVILTEC ENGINEERING, INC 4,947.71 803664 04/29/2026 PRINTED 024279 COLLICUTT ENERGY SERVICES 3,570.37 803665 04/29/2026 PRINTED 014721 CORE & MAIN LP 4,149.00 803666 04/29/2026 PRINTED 017796 DAN'S LAWNMOWER CENTER 4,256.71 803667 04/29/2026 PRINTED 021630 DIAMOND TRUCK BODY MANUFA 58,642.00 803668 04/29/2026 PRINTED 017674 WYATT, DEBORAH LYNN 18,900.00 803669 04/29/2026 PRINTED 011814 DOLCH PARTRIDGE, JUDITH 24,150.00 803670 04/29/2026 PRINTED 002607 FAUST MEDIA SERVICES, LLC 2,004.27 803671 04/29/2026 PRINTED 020215 FINCH, JENIFER 8,400.00 803672 04/29/2026 PRINTED 011295 FIREMAN ROCK & NURSERY IN 1,141.88 803673 04/29/2026 PRINTED 011810 FISCHER REVOCABLE LIVING 9,975.00 803674 04/29/2026 PRINTED 023715 HEMET MANUFACTURING COMPA 99,276.46 803675 04/29/2026 PRINTED 007383 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO., INC 22.12 803676 04/29/2026 PRINTED 011822 HELENDALE COMMUNITY SERVI 241,029.00 803677 04/29/2026 PRINTED 024536 DRS AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, LLC 1,103.18 803678 04/29/2026 PRINTED 017053 HIGH DESERT LOCK & SAFE, 278.43 803679 04/29/2026 PRINTED 019828 HIGH DESERT SECOND CHANCE 41,145.55 803680 04/29/2026 PRINTED 024088 HOLLAND, LES 245.00 803681 04/29/2026 PRINTED 023338 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BER 75.00 803682 04/29/2026 PRINTED 024746 HYLAND, MATTHEW 1,061.02 803683 04/29/2026 PRINTED 024413 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION 874.35 803684 04/29/2026 PRINTED 021571 JENSEN, JOEL C. 375.00 803685 04/29/2026 PRINTED 011819 JEROME R FISHER TRUST 168,000.00 803686 04/29/2026 PRINTED 011817 JESS RANCH WATER COMPANY 1,443,225.00 803687 04/29/2026 PRINTED 017662 KEMPER CAMPBELL RANCH, LL 117,075.00 803688 04/29/2026 PRINTED 018875 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS S 168.74 803689 04/29/2026 PRINTED 011805 LAWSON, BARBARA 2,100.00 803690 04/29/2026 PRINTED 010660 LOVELAND'S AUTOMOTIVE SER 2,820.61 803691 04/29/2026 PRINTED 011816 LOW, DEAN R 53,025.00 803692 04/29/2026 PRINTED 022008 LPA, INC. 178,316.20 803693 04/29/2026 PRINTED 023586 VILLEGAS, DARREN 1,000.00 803694 04/29/2026 PRINTED 024214 MEDINA, JOSEPH 70.44 803695 04/29/2026 PRINTED 022212 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY CO. 2,296.73 803696 04/29/2026 PRINTED 016384 PHELAN PINON HILLS COMMUN 50,925.00 803697 04/29/2026 PRINTED 023551 PRECISION GARAGE DOOR & G 2,800.00 803698 04/29/2026 PRINTED 021481 VELASCO,JOSEPH 4,079.44
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
AP CHECK RECONCILIATION REGISTER
Report generated: 04/29/2026 14:55
User: avgonzalez
Program ID: apchkrcn
FOR CASH ACCOUNT: 000 11100 FOR: Uncleared CHECK # CHECK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME UNCLEARED CLEARED BATCH CLEAR DATE 803699 04/29/2026 PRINTED 017659 RUE RANCH, INC. 8,400.00 803700 04/29/2026 PRINTED 023680 JACOBS, SHANE 2,080.00 803701 04/29/2026 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 21,178.06 803702 04/29/2026 PRINTED 002188 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 2,017.63 803703 04/29/2026 PRINTED 020453 SOUTH COAST LIGHTING & DE 28,041.06 803704 04/29/2026 PRINTED 024609 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAG 2,577.03 803705 04/29/2026 PRINTED 011812 STORM, RANDALL 16,800.00 803706 04/29/2026 PRINTED 024219 STUDIO 2G ARCHITECTS, LLC 14,794.61 803707 04/29/2026 PRINTED 017669 SUDMEIER, GLENN W. 5,250.00 803708 04/29/2026 PRINTED 002204 SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION 6,958.63 803709 04/29/2026 PRINTED 016034 JAMES A. & SULA B. THOMPS 48,300.00 803710 04/29/2026 PRINTED 013999 THRASHER, GARY 98,175.00 803711 04/29/2026 PRINTED 015430 TRI-PACIFIC SUPPLY, INC. 633.81 803712 04/29/2026 PRINTED 019542 URBAN FUTURES INC. 4,875.00 803713 04/29/2026 PRINTED 022706 RED BARN MEDIA, INC. 106.50 803714 04/29/2026 PRINTED 022386 VEGA, DAVID 1,417.80 803715 04/29/2026 PRINTED 002475 VESD CAFETERIA 351.84 803716 04/29/2026 PRINTED 022948 VILLALVAZO, ALFREDO 59.00 803717 04/29/2026 PRINTED 006411 CITY OF VICTORVILLE 2,486,949.72 803718 04/29/2026 PRINTED 013928 WAGNER LIVING TRUST 323,925.00 803719 04/29/2026 PRINTED 019381 WAKULA, CHRISTIAN 2,625.00 803720 04/29/2026 PRINTED 002125 WANG, CHU WUEN 26.02 803721 04/29/2026 PRINTED 011802 WEST, JIMMIE R 2,625.00 803722 04/29/2026 PRINTED 024204 HIGH POINT CONCRETE CONST 11,880.94 803723 04/29/2026 PRINTED 010896 PIPELOGIX INC. 2,500.00 389 CHECKS CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL 10,978,163.10 .00 DATE OF WIRE ACCOUNT NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT WELLS FARGO BANK CONF # 04/20/26 VV ELEC REV 2022A Principal and Interest Payment 590,945.59$ CHIPS:S00254177I0000584R0000000O0000000 04/20/26 VV ELEC REV 2022B Principal and Interest Payment 1,793,780.25$ CHIPS:S00254594I0000663R0000645O0000000 04/24/26 ROUTE 66 ESCROW
ESC # 311907-CG APN
0478-042-17 5,000.00$ FED:20260424I1B7032R001268 Total: $2,389,725.84
Item Number: 4
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: May 19, 2026
Submitted By:
Robert Clemmer, Fire Chief
Subject:
Fire Department Quarterly Report - Third Quarter
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council review and file.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Strategic Plan Goal F, Communication and Outreach - Build strong connections with community partners, residents, and employees. We aim to provide more insight to our community of what the Fire Department accomplishes in a quarterly basis by presenting this report.
Background:
Staff has compiled the Fire Department Quarterly Report for the months of January through March 2026.
Discussion:
The attached Fire Department Quarterly Report includes call response statistics, department activity updates, and various helpful information from the department.
Prepared By:
Stephanie Ramos, Administrative Secretary
Attachments: A. Fire Department Quarterly Report - Third Quarter Attachment A
Fire Department
Quarterly Report - Third
Quarter
Quarterly Report
VICTORVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT
FY 26 THIRD QUARTER REPORT
J A N U A R Y - M A R C H 2 0 2 6
Quarterly Report
MESSAGE FROM THE FIRE CHIEF
1 J A N U A R Y - M A R C H 2 0 2 6
The Victorville Fire Department entered 2026 with a continued focus on operational excellence, personnel development, and strengthening service delivery to the community. During the months of January through March, the department made significant progress across several key areas, including fiscal planning, workforce development, training, and technological advancement. The department has finalized its budget with the executive team, ensuring alignment with the City’s strategic priorities while maintaining a strong emphasis on operational readiness, personnel investment, and long-term fiscal responsibility.
A major accomplishment during this reporting period was the completion of department-wide CARE Team training for all fire personnel. This training focused on individual and group incident debriefing, crisis management, and peer support resources, reinforcing the department’s commitment to the mental and emotional well-being of its members. By equipping personnel with these tools, the department continues to foster a resilient workforce capable of effectively managing the challenges associated with emergency response.
Quarterly Report
J A N U A R Y - M A R C H 2 0 2 6
2 MESSAGE FROM THE FIRE CHIEF CONTINUED
The department also conducted recruitment processes for the positions of Captain, Engineer and Firefighter, resulting in both internal promotions and the onboarding of new personnel. Mr. Carlos Torres was successfully promoted to Captain and Mr. Jim McGee was promoted to Engineer. In addition, job offers were extended to nine Firefighter EMTs (FF/EMT) and Firefighter Paramedics (FF/PM), strengthening frontline staffing and enhancing the department’s ability to meet increasing service demands.
These efforts reflect a balanced approach to developing internal talent while attracting highly qualified candidates to serve the Victorville community.
In support of modernizing operations, the department secured and implemented ImageTrend Continuum, a comprehensive data collection and management platform.
This system will significantly improve incident tracking, reporting accuracy, and data- driven decision-making, positioning the department to better analyze trends, allocate resources efficiently, and continuously improve service delivery.
The department also takes great pride in recognizing the outstanding efforts of its personnel. Engineer Shara Aivazi and Captain Carlos Torres were honored by the Rotary Club for their heroic actions during an incident that occurred in Green Tree Blvd. Their professionalism, courage, and dedication exemplifying the highest standards of the fire service and reflect positively on the entire organization.
The Victorville Fire Department continues to work diligently each day to serve the community with professionalism, integrity, and commitment. Building on the progress achieved during this reporting period, the department remains focused on advancing its mission and maintaining the trust and safety of the residents it serves.
Quarterly Report
3RD QUARTER CALL VOLUME
RESPONSE HEAT MAP
J A N U A R Y - M A R C H 2 0 2 6
3 Quarterly Report
4 PROMOTIONS:
Congratulations to our new recent promotions:
Carlos Torres - Captain
James McGee - Engineer
Carlos Meza - Firefighter Paramedic (FF/PM)
NEW TO THE TEAM:
We are happy to welcome, Ms. Summer Virgilio our new Fire Management Technician and Mr. Mario Lopez, our new EMS
Management Technician to the team.
OPEN RECRUITMENTS:
EMS Specialist
J A N U A R Y - M A R C H 2 0 2 6
PROMOTIONS/RECRUITMENT
Quarterly Report
5 J A N U A R Y - M A R C H 2 0 2 6
OPERATIONS
D u r i n g t h e t h i r d q u a r t e r , t h e V i c t o r v i l l e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t m a i n t a i n e d a h i g h o p e r a t i o n a l t e m p o , a v e r a g i n g a p p r o x i m a t e l y o n e w o r k i n g s t r u c t u r e f i r e ( F S W / F C W ) p e r w e e k . N o t a b l e i n c i d e n t s d u r i n g t h i s p e r i o d i n c l u d e d a r e s i d e n t i a l s t r u c t u r e f i r e o n H e s p e r i a R o a d o n F e b r u a r y 2 , i n w h i c h r e s u l t e d w i t h o n e o f o u r F i r e f i g h t e r / P a r a m e d i c s r e s c u i n g a k i t t e n . O n F e b r u a r y 7 , a m o t o r h o m e o n R o d e o D r i v e r e s u l t e d i n m u l t i p l e b u r n v i c t i m s a n d w e r e t r a n s p o r t e d t o l o c a l h o s p i t a l s . M e d i c a l E n g i n e ( M E ) 3 1 1 , M T ( M e d i c T r u c k ) 3 1 1 , a s s i s t i n g e n g i n e , M E 2 2 a n d B C 4 3 1 2 A - S h i f t , r e s p o n d e d t o t h e m o t o r h o m e o n f i r e . A s w e t r a n s i t i o n i n t o t h e s u m m e r m o n t h s , i t i s a n t i c i p a t e d t h a t t h i s t r e n d w i l l c o n t i n u e .
Fire Engineer Jim McGee
with rescued kitten
Mobile home fire that occured on February 7
Quarterly Report
6 ADMINISTRATIVE EVENTS
J A N U A R Y - M A R C H 2 0 2 6
J a n 8 : C a r d i a c a r r e s t s a v e r e c o g n i t i o n t h
J a n 2 1 : C a p t a i n ’ s W o r k s h o p
s t
J a n 2 1 : S t a t i c d i s p l a y h e l d f o r D i s c o v e r y S c h o o l o f A r t s s t
J a n 2 2 : S t a t i c d i s p l a y h e l d f o r c a r e e r d a y a t L a k e v i e w L e a d e r s h i p n d
J a n 2 3 : S t a t i o n t o u r a t F S 3 1 1 f o r e l e m e n t a r y s t u d e n t s r d
J a n 2 9 : S t a t i o n t o u r a t F S 3 1 2 f o r e l e m e n t a r y s t u d e n t s t h
J a n 3 0 : C a p t a i n ’ s W o r k s h o p
t h
F e b 4 : S t a t i o n t o u r h e l d f o r e l e m e n t a r y s c h o o l s t u d e n t s / S t a t i c d i s p l a y a t G a l i l e o A c a d e m y ’ s c a r e e r d a y t h
F e b 1 1 : C a p t a i n ’ s W o r k s h o p
t h
Cardiac Arrest save recognition - VFD personnel along with AMR staff Quarterly Report
7 J A N U A R Y - M A R C H 2 0 2 6
ADMINISTRATIVE EVENTS
Feb 17 : Static display for Child Care Resource
Center
th
Feb 18 & Feb 19 : Captain’s Workshopth th
Feb 26 : Station tour for Endeavour Schoolth
Mar 18 : Station tour held for VIP Solutionsth
Mar 25 : Station tour held for elementary studentsth
8 Quarterly Report
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
J A N U A R Y - M A R C H 2 0 2 6
January:
Jan. 1 : Fire Department staff ride was conducted with City Executive leaders City Manager Keith Metzler, Deputy City Manager Tony Camargo, Chief Officers and managers.
st
Jan 15 : Advanced Airway Management Training, a training focused on airway management and utilization of the new Video Laryngoscope (VL) “Glidescope Go 2", which is a tool used to intubate a patient requiring advanced airway management. th
Jan 26 : Training and review was conducted by our EMS Manager on the use of ImageTrend to include Public Record Requests (PRRs) and running reports through Report Writer.
th
Jan 27 : The EMS Division met with VendNovation to transition from IQ Technology software, which was previously utilized to inventory EMS supplies in the UCapIT machines we have at City Hall and each of our fire stations. This machine allows for vending and tracking of EMS Supplies.
th
February:
Feb 6 : Advanced Airway Management Trainingth
Feb 27 : Firefighter/Paramedic, Carlos Meza, graduated from the Moorpark CollegeParamedic program. th
March:
Mar 5 : EMS Steering Committee - agreement was made for new Pelican drug boxesand new BLS airway bag decision was reached with majority votes. th
Mar 9 : ICEMA unit inspections were conducted resulting in passing inspections for allunits th
Mar 30 : North End QI (Quality Improvement) meeting was held with all pre-hospitaland hospital agencies who come together to discuss improvement in overall care andcommunication for the high desert. th
Mar 31 : Zoll machine annual preventative maintenance performed on all cardiacmonitors. st
Item Number: 5
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: May 19, 2026
Submitted By:
Carmen Cun, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Payroll Demand Schedule No. 9A
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Payroll Demand Schedule No. 9A for the payroll period of February 27, 2026, through March 13, 2026, in total amount of $2,454,734.26. This total includes:
Employee Check Nos. 34820, 34830 through 34834 and 34851 through 34853 in the amount of $32,586.37.
Vendor Check Nos. 34835 through 34839 in the amount of $702.31. Advice Nos. 341007 through 341587 and 342171 in the amount of $1,567,535.39; and
Vendor Electronic Payments totaling $853,910.19.
All expenditures are consistent with the adopted Fiscal Year 2025–2026 Budget (covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
Fiscal Impact:
A total fiscal impact of $2,454,734.26 is authorized with this action. The attached report details all payment types including employee checks, vendor checks, advices, and electronic payments.
Discussion:
I hereby certify that the claims or demands covered by the attached list of warrants have been audited as to the accuracy and availability of funds for payment thereof and that said claims or demands are accurate and the funds are available for payment thereof.
Prepared By:
Kimberly Major, Payroll Specialist
Attachments: A. Payroll Report PPE 031326
Attachment A
Payroll Report PPE 031326
Total Net
$14,164.93
$9,640.13
$891.74
$2,200.68
$2,464.57
$2,131.72
$364.20
$364.20
$364.20
32,586.37
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
Check Number Employee ID Check Date
34820 3697 03/04/2026
34830 3735 03/06/2026
34834 3279 03/20/2026
34831 3466 03/20/2026
34832 3879 03/20/2026
Checks Total
Employee Checks
34852 3949 04/03/2026
34853 3556 04/03/2026
34851 3310 04/03/2026
34833 3853 03/20/2026
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 1 of 18 03/20/2026 Total Net
$5.00
$50.00
$50.00
$422.31
$175.00
702.31Checks Total
34838 13491 03/20/2026
34839 18154 03/20/2026
34836 1182 03/20/2026
34837 1182 03/20/2026
Check Number Vendor ID Check Date
34835 240 03/20/2026
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
Vendor Checks
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 2 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total Net
3296 03/06/2026 $6,721.66
3511 03/13/2026 $4,486.94
3396 03/20/2026 $2,514.17
4048 03/20/2026 $1,663.03
1099 03/20/2026 $1,398.43
3243 03/20/2026 $5,566.73
2115 03/20/2026 $6,480.39
3640 03/20/2026 $589.84
3527 03/20/2026 $2,340.30
3945 03/20/2026 $778.95
3551 03/20/2026 $940.76
3229 03/20/2026 $5,454.14
3918 03/20/2026 $1,315.90
3290 03/20/2026 $2,897.08
4032 03/20/2026 $2,073.55
1064 03/20/2026 $27,335.40
4051 03/20/2026 $768.06
3467 03/20/2026 $2,775.20
3909 03/20/2026 $1,748.23
2395 03/20/2026 $4,615.21
3764 03/20/2026 $2,753.59
2211 03/20/2026 $6,179.23
3747 03/20/2026 $2,192.09
3625 03/20/2026 $1,815.86
2624 03/20/2026 $2,837.54
3043 03/20/2026 $2,061.97
3964 03/20/2026 $1,265.71
3403 03/20/2026 $1,901.04
3963 03/20/2026 $2,037.87
3848 03/20/2026 $2,071.20
3957 03/20/2026 $3,529.24
3579 03/20/2026 $1,193.16
4052 03/20/2026 $2,013.49
3931 03/20/2026 $2,254.26
3913 03/20/2026 $2,310.44
3019 03/20/2026 $5,253.22
3638 03/20/2026 $4,035.07
3561 03/20/2026 $2,896.66
3920 03/20/2026 $2,546.20
3630 03/20/2026 $2,473.40
341044
341045
341046
341039
341040
341041
341042
341043
341034
341035
341036
341037
341038
341029
341030
341031
341032
341033
341024
341025
341026
341027
341028
341019
341020
341021
341022
341023
341015
341016
341017
341018
341009
341010
341011
341012
341013
Check Number
341007
341008
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
341014
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 3 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
4059 03/20/2026 $1,285.60
3750 03/20/2026 $2,155.01
4058 03/20/2026 $1,972.60
3521 03/20/2026 $2,790.92
4060 03/20/2026 $1,556.95
2093 03/20/2026 $1,847.76
2019 03/20/2026 $2,646.29
3753 03/20/2026 $3,544.42
3915 03/20/2026 $4,621.36
3917 03/20/2026 $2,188.11
3744 03/20/2026 $2,740.41
2606 03/20/2026 $2,496.28
3660 03/20/2026 $1,934.92
3914 03/20/2026 $2,425.43
1635 03/20/2026 $4,351.81
3327 03/20/2026 $2,629.31
3752 03/20/2026 $2,296.23
3912 03/20/2026 $1,662.32
3727 03/20/2026 $1,028.80
4035 03/20/2026 $2,476.92
3911 03/20/2026 $2,106.01
2618 03/20/2026 $2,660.42
4039 03/20/2026 $2,510.29
3845 03/20/2026 $3,767.05
2619 03/20/2026 $2,547.80
3586 03/20/2026 $2,472.13
3916 03/20/2026 $2,628.48
3889 03/20/2026 $2,235.30
3045 03/20/2026 $2,353.14
3755 03/20/2026 $2,212.77
3608 03/20/2026 $5,137.82
3758 03/20/2026 $4,395.55
3817 03/20/2026 $2,255.74
3953 03/20/2026 $1,445.65
3362 03/20/2026 $2,883.17
2297 03/20/2026 $2,277.78
2232 03/20/2026 $3,238.73
1957 03/20/2026 $3,117.17
3809 03/20/2026 $127.46
3085 03/20/2026 $2,201.06
341084
341085
341086
341079
341080
341081
341082
341083
341074
341075
341076
341077
341078
341069
341070
341071
341072
341073
341064
341065
341066
341067
341068
341059
341060
341061
341062
341063
341054
341055
341056
341057
341058
341049
341050
341051
341052
341053
341047
341048
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 4 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
3714 03/20/2026 $2,388.00
3742 03/20/2026 $2,283.34
3863 03/20/2026 $2,865.79
3846 03/20/2026 $4,195.17
3987 03/20/2026 $2,600.80
3868 03/20/2026 $3,126.59
2102 03/20/2026 $3,861.52
2233 03/20/2026 $2,959.80
3997 03/20/2026 $2,475.63
3865 03/20/2026 $2,400.37
2032 03/20/2026 $4,164.00
3499 03/20/2026 $2,707.90
3703 03/20/2026 $2,254.22
2323 03/20/2026 $3,906.15
3502 03/20/2026 $2,666.89
3508 03/20/2026 $2,927.99
3740 03/20/2026 $31.75
2225 03/20/2026 $11,417.81
3221 03/20/2026 $2,916.35
3757 03/20/2026 $3,737.01
3998 03/20/2026 $3,092.57
3700 03/20/2026 $2,402.97
3966 03/20/2026 $2,652.11
2254 03/20/2026 $3,213.16
3618 03/20/2026 $2,527.03
3354 03/20/2026 $3,984.67
3400 03/20/2026 $2,799.19
3933 03/20/2026 $1,199.56
3544 03/20/2026 $2,356.23
4057 03/20/2026 $2,378.13
2742 03/20/2026 $2,988.45
3934 03/20/2026 $4,273.59
3746 03/20/2026 $2,421.68
3089 03/20/2026 $3,521.34
3641 03/20/2026 $2,314.42
3854 03/20/2026 $2,570.88
3634 03/20/2026 $3,060.30
3805 03/20/2026 $3,026.66
2249 03/20/2026 $5,133.54
3650 03/20/2026 $2,089.18
341124
341125
341126
341119
341120
341121
341122
341123
341114
341115
341116
341117
341118
341109
341110
341111
341112
341113
341104
341105
341106
341107
341108
341099
341100
341101
341102
341103
341094
341095
341096
341097
341098
341089
341090
341091
341092
341093
341087
341088
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 5 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
3938 03/20/2026 $1,769.24
3576 03/20/2026 $1,904.64
3876 03/20/2026 $2,630.31
3663 03/20/2026 $1,922.99
3541 03/20/2026 $3,158.96
2499 03/20/2026 $3,603.64
3379 03/20/2026 $2,883.41
3694 03/20/2026 $2,914.98
4004 03/20/2026 $1,207.96
3737 03/20/2026 $2,956.34
2105 03/20/2026 $5,231.78
3474 03/20/2026 $2,667.26
4038 03/20/2026 $2,011.26
2515 03/20/2026 $3,262.12
3636 03/20/2026 $3,018.87
2679 03/20/2026 $3,613.20
3490 03/20/2026 $2,723.33
3475 03/20/2026 $2,513.79
2181 03/20/2026 $9,190.45
3880 03/20/2026 $1,288.13
3542 03/20/2026 $3,027.55
3731 03/20/2026 $2,215.27
1955 03/20/2026 $3,285.83
3943 03/20/2026 $2,280.01
3719 03/20/2026 $2,238.47
1632 03/20/2026 $2,587.44
3736 03/20/2026 $3,384.46
3692 03/20/2026 $3,303.05
3147 03/20/2026 $2,887.86
3881 03/20/2026 $1,272.02
3732 03/20/2026 $3,293.36
3944 03/20/2026 $1,243.92
3148 03/20/2026 $2,901.91
3808 03/20/2026 $3,626.66
3195 03/20/2026 $2,743.57
3884 03/20/2026 $1,272.02
4005 03/20/2026 $1,373.40
3353 03/20/2026 $2,733.07
3626 03/20/2026 $2,674.05
3602 03/20/2026 $4,159.01
341164
341165
341166
341159
341160
341161
341162
341163
341154
341155
341156
341157
341158
341149
341150
341151
341152
341153
341144
341145
341146
341147
341148
341139
341140
341141
341142
341143
341134
341135
341136
341137
341138
341129
341130
341131
341132
341133
341127
341128
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 6 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
3112 03/20/2026 $1,971.16
3185 03/20/2026 $2,736.63
2605 03/20/2026 $2,281.61
3505 03/20/2026 $5,549.48
2377 03/20/2026 $3,390.72
4049 03/20/2026 $2,829.25
4002 03/20/2026 $2,483.34
2259 03/20/2026 $4,853.77
3637 03/20/2026 $3,041.19
3628 03/20/2026 $2,649.86
3068 03/20/2026 $2,116.95
3702 03/20/2026 $2,475.36
3633 03/20/2026 $2,956.07
3129 03/20/2026 $3,960.61
3816 03/20/2026 $3,225.27
3543 03/20/2026 $2,227.71
3303 03/20/2026 $4,269.24
3802 03/20/2026 $2,834.93
3558 03/20/2026 $3,026.46
1655 03/20/2026 $6,212.74
4008 03/20/2026 $2,708.33
1776 03/20/2026 $3,252.83
2600 03/20/2026 $3,093.78
2655 03/20/2026 $1,589.15
3393 03/20/2026 $2,452.69
3749 03/20/2026 $2,605.04
2522 03/20/2026 $4,263.97
2339 03/20/2026 $2,446.95
3878 03/20/2026 $3,620.49
1503 03/20/2026 $3,037.42
2505 03/20/2026 $2,806.14
1970 03/20/2026 $2,377.85
3113 03/20/2026 $2,070.87
1520 03/20/2026 $2,517.66
3273 03/20/2026 $2,396.84
3821 03/20/2026 $1,994.13
1497 03/20/2026 $3,497.52
3537 03/20/2026 $3,258.61
2540 03/20/2026 $4,229.01
3513 03/20/2026 $2,654.41
341204
341205
341206
341199
341200
341201
341202
341203
341194
341195
341196
341197
341198
341189
341190
341191
341192
341193
341184
341185
341186
341187
341188
341179
341180
341181
341182
341183
341174
341175
341176
341177
341178
341169
341170
341171
341172
341173
341167
341168
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 7 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
3685 03/20/2026 $2,013.25
2034 03/20/2026 $2,794.29
3380 03/20/2026 $2,369.77
3792 03/20/2026 $2,075.41
3871 03/20/2026 $2,407.72
3852 03/20/2026 $1,885.31
3051 03/20/2026 $2,467.65
1750 03/20/2026 $2,659.74
2770 03/20/2026 $2,019.31
4068 03/20/2026 $842.37
2228 03/20/2026 $3,266.33
3827 03/20/2026 $3,735.69
3726 03/20/2026 $2,595.79
3748 03/20/2026 $2,242.78
3101 03/20/2026 $2,718.55
3335 03/20/2026 $2,608.63
3284 03/20/2026 $3,415.93
3840 03/20/2026 $3,158.81
2312 03/20/2026 $2,344.15
3510 03/20/2026 $2,652.86
2248 03/20/2026 $2,088.53
3622 03/20/2026 $1,950.77
3788 03/20/2026 $1,815.09
2189 03/20/2026 $3,396.42
3560 03/20/2026 $2,141.07
3509 03/20/2026 $2,649.81
4062 03/20/2026 $2,212.17
1121 03/20/2026 $2,600.96
3968 03/20/2026 $2,849.76
3149 03/20/2026 $3,569.95
1865 03/20/2026 $2,402.30
3479 03/20/2026 $2,191.26
1723 03/20/2026 $2,110.57
3707 03/20/2026 $2,899.34
3572 03/20/2026 $2,028.90
2531 03/20/2026 $3,984.59
1513 03/20/2026 $2,145.74
3283 03/20/2026 $4,833.93
2118 03/20/2026 $1,680.94
3387 03/20/2026 $2,416.76
341244
341245
341246
341239
341240
341241
341242
341243
341234
341235
341236
341237
341238
341229
341230
341231
341232
341233
341224
341225
341226
341227
341228
341219
341220
341221
341222
341223
341214
341215
341216
341217
341218
341209
341210
341211
341212
341213
341207
341208
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 8 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
3330 03/20/2026 $2,537.64
2681 03/20/2026 $4,280.40
3988 03/20/2026 $3,634.96
1612 03/20/2026 $1,982.41
3610 03/20/2026 $1,912.81
3277 03/20/2026 $2,238.09
3287 03/20/2026 $2,236.11
3037 03/20/2026 $2,490.00
1449 03/20/2026 $3,144.77
2111 03/20/2026 $2,530.43
2677 03/20/2026 $6,043.78
3984 03/20/2026 $3,226.95
3688 03/20/2026 $1,963.61
3341 03/20/2026 $2,592.74
3970 03/20/2026 $1,253.42
2383 03/20/2026 $2,133.93
3687 03/20/2026 $2,153.12
3130 03/20/2026 $1,912.58
2489 03/20/2026 $1,825.11
4067 03/20/2026 $1,667.94
3733 03/20/2026 $1,892.50
3361 03/20/2026 $2,792.29
3285 03/20/2026 $3,798.57
1529 03/20/2026 $2,120.13
3624 03/20/2026 $2,006.04
3139 03/20/2026 $1,720.01
3099 03/20/2026 $2,603.22
4069 03/20/2026 $842.37
3994 03/20/2026 $2,008.62
3346 03/20/2026 $2,045.94
3969 03/20/2026 $1,891.26
3536 03/20/2026 $3,322.60
3722 03/20/2026 $2,137.80
1254 03/20/2026 $2,289.10
3187 03/20/2026 $2,209.53
3804 03/20/2026 $2,685.61
2368 03/20/2026 $2,178.70
3192 03/20/2026 $2,234.49
3100 03/20/2026 $3,388.58
3796 03/20/2026 $1,743.98
341284
341285
341286
341279
341280
341281
341282
341283
341274
341275
341276
341277
341278
341269
341270
341271
341272
341273
341264
341265
341266
341267
341268
341259
341260
341261
341262
341263
341254
341255
341256
341257
341258
341249
341250
341251
341252
341253
341247
341248
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 9 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
1338 03/20/2026 $4,010.15
2229 03/20/2026 $2,228.65
4001 03/20/2026 $4,025.54
1049 03/20/2026 $2,474.01
1506 03/20/2026 $2,028.56
3004 03/20/2026 $2,447.28
2833 03/20/2026 $2,588.12
3794 03/20/2026 $2,101.38
2798 03/20/2026 $2,463.92
3265 03/20/2026 $2,099.84
1932 03/20/2026 $2,817.88
2460 03/20/2026 $2,339.94
3874 03/20/2026 $2,710.27
3671 03/20/2026 $1,794.35
2732 03/20/2026 $2,014.13
3823 03/20/2026 $1,882.31
3338 03/20/2026 $1,734.95
2552 03/20/2026 $2,017.75
2476 03/20/2026 $3,757.35
2279 03/20/2026 $2,484.51
3515 03/20/2026 $6,437.06
3092 03/20/2026 $3,218.09
3836 03/20/2026 $2,222.29
3138 03/20/2026 $3,396.97
3512 03/20/2026 $2,541.07
3146 03/20/2026 $3,392.20
2590 03/20/2026 $2,624.33
2748 03/20/2026 $2,295.51
3709 03/20/2026 $5,213.82
2669 03/20/2026 $3,713.60
2623 03/20/2026 $2,189.74
2637 03/20/2026 $2,995.68
3972 03/20/2026 $5,178.61
2638 03/20/2026 $3,458.82
3803 03/20/2026 $2,393.80
3109 03/20/2026 $2,989.47
2671 03/20/2026 $3,997.93
2593 03/20/2026 $2,928.38
3328 03/20/2026 $2,521.20
3461 03/20/2026 $2,518.92
341324
341325
341326
341319
341320
341321
341322
341323
341314
341315
341316
341317
341318
341309
341310
341311
341312
341313
341304
341305
341306
341307
341308
341299
341300
341301
341302
341303
341294
341295
341296
341297
341298
341289
341290
341291
341292
341293
341287
341288
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 10 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
2626 03/20/2026 $2,279.11
3621 03/20/2026 $2,083.41
3937 03/20/2026 $2,323.84
3038 03/20/2026 $2,657.83
3052 03/20/2026 $2,127.69
2290 03/20/2026 $2,051.51
3716 03/20/2026 $2,082.83
3110 03/20/2026 $3,271.14
2641 03/20/2026 $299.74
2612 03/20/2026 $2,689.96
2642 03/20/2026 $2,597.76
3705 03/20/2026 $2,130.80
3331 03/20/2026 $2,101.04
2674 03/20/2026 $2,839.38
3231 03/20/2026 $2,528.39
3228 03/20/2026 $2,935.12
2628 03/20/2026 $2,683.99
2630 03/20/2026 $3,479.14
3182 03/20/2026 $3,014.07
2599 03/20/2026 $2,301.38
2683 03/20/2026 $2,036.97
2753 03/20/2026 $2,313.97
2610 03/20/2026 $4,305.90
3323 03/20/2026 $1,908.53
1389 03/20/2026 $3,017.40
2808 03/20/2026 $2,110.67
2646 03/20/2026 $4,202.37
3617 03/20/2026 $1,930.74
2524 03/20/2026 $3,146.90
2686 03/20/2026 $2,327.97
3942 03/20/2026 $2,149.42
3951 03/20/2026 $1,590.50
2193 03/20/2026 $2,294.56
3629 03/20/2026 $3,008.65
3230 03/20/2026 $4,533.66
2038 03/20/2026 $1,863.49
3985 03/20/2026 $1,979.16
2678 03/20/2026 $4,503.56
3240 03/20/2026 $2,977.02
4040 03/20/2026 $1,771.86
341364
341365
341366
341359
341360
341361
341362
341363
341354
341355
341356
341357
341358
341349
341350
341351
341352
341353
341344
341345
341346
341347
341348
341339
341340
341341
341342
341343
341334
341335
341336
341337
341338
341329
341330
341331
341332
341333
341327
341328
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 11 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
3215 03/20/2026 $3,167.76
3140 03/20/2026 $2,480.87
3035 03/20/2026 $1,854.77
4020 03/20/2026 $1,295.51
3651 03/20/2026 $2,491.06
3299 03/20/2026 $2,185.30
4015 03/20/2026 $1,257.96
4036 03/20/2026 $1,333.83
1853 03/20/2026 $3,066.12
3729 03/20/2026 $1,866.33
2343 03/20/2026 $1,739.24
3959 03/20/2026 $1,309.13
3497 03/20/2026 $2,324.77
1426 03/20/2026 $1,189.92
3105 03/20/2026 $1,904.94
4010 03/20/2026 $1,348.67
3386 03/20/2026 $2,933.52
3191 03/20/2026 $2,403.28
3922 03/20/2026 $2,064.41
2488 03/20/2026 $1,190.13
3496 03/20/2026 $1,434.11
4021 03/20/2026 $909.31
3482 03/20/2026 $1,969.46
3611 03/20/2026 $1,738.37
3724 03/20/2026 $1,243.92
3011 03/20/2026 $1,772.78
3623 03/20/2026 $1,211.92
3768 03/20/2026 $484.15
4016 03/20/2026 $1,333.83
3580 03/20/2026 $1,747.69
3905 03/20/2026 $65.64
3939 03/20/2026 $2,341.70
3873 03/20/2026 $2,051.07
3270 03/20/2026 $2,175.52
4000 03/20/2026 $2,382.79
3263 03/20/2026 $1,995.01
3795 03/20/2026 $2,152.20
3252 03/20/2026 $2,841.30
3295 03/20/2026 $2,208.69
3257 03/20/2026 $2,598.80
341404
341405
341406
341399
341400
341401
341402
341403
341394
341395
341396
341397
341398
341389
341390
341391
341392
341393
341384
341385
341386
341387
341388
341379
341380
341381
341382
341383
341374
341375
341376
341377
341378
341369
341370
341371
341372
341373
341367
341368
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 12 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
3184 03/20/2026 $3,665.70
3070 03/20/2026 $2,257.17
3689 03/20/2026 $1,883.84
3898 03/20/2026 $402.09
4012 03/20/2026 $1,364.97
3288 03/20/2026 $2,099.99
3767 03/20/2026 $868.80
1866 03/20/2026 $3,356.00
3774 03/20/2026 $590.82
3791 03/20/2026 $1,257.96
3950 03/20/2026 $3,688.16
3936 03/20/2026 $1,228.82
3772 03/20/2026 $393.88
3340 03/20/2026 $1,237.03
3766 03/20/2026 $1,085.27
3822 03/20/2026 $1,257.96
1282 03/20/2026 $2,621.81
3481 03/20/2026 $2,175.43
2379 03/20/2026 $2,422.03
4028 03/20/2026 $1,257.95
3813 03/20/2026 $1,016.80
3672 03/20/2026 $1,272.02
3656 03/20/2026 $1,154.02
3789 03/20/2026 $4,601.93
4018 03/20/2026 $1,326.46
3793 03/20/2026 $2,067.97
3775 03/20/2026 $673.82
2478 03/20/2026 $1,179.61
3919 03/20/2026 $1,042.02
1287 03/20/2026 $2,997.81
3477 03/20/2026 $57.46
3973 03/20/2026 $2,148.40
4064 03/20/2026 $2,245.15
3667 03/20/2026 $205.14
4014 03/20/2026 $1,257.96
2711 03/20/2026 $3,335.43
3900 03/20/2026 $315.93
3798 03/20/2026 $1,250.95
3258 03/20/2026 $2,098.45
4017 03/20/2026 $1,257.96
341444
341445
341446
341439
341440
341441
341442
341443
341434
341435
341436
341437
341438
341429
341430
341431
341432
341433
341424
341425
341426
341427
341428
341419
341420
341421
341422
341423
341414
341415
341416
341417
341418
341409
341410
341411
341412
341413
341407
341408
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 13 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
3259 03/20/2026 $1,810.00
4031 03/20/2026 $1,326.46
3507 03/20/2026 $2,681.04
3790 03/20/2026 $1,305.52
3531 03/20/2026 $3,757.65
3655 03/20/2026 $1,506.68
3897 03/20/2026 $714.83
3814 03/20/2026 $1,070.90
3639 03/20/2026 $1,572.07
3587 03/20/2026 $1,016.80
3901 03/20/2026 $558.00
3029 03/20/2026 $2,415.41
3190 03/20/2026 $3,071.66
1959 03/20/2026 $3,794.18
3250 03/20/2026 $1,950.29
3824 03/20/2026 $1,257.96
4007 03/20/2026 $2,657.36
3609 03/20/2026 $1,680.94
3492 03/20/2026 $736.73
3866 03/20/2026 $1,301.99
3910 03/20/2026 $1,089.71
3725 03/20/2026 $1,333.83
3647 03/20/2026 $98.47
3777 03/20/2026 $233.88
4033 03/20/2026 $2,203.12
4011 03/20/2026 $1,333.83
3867 03/20/2026 $1,806.74
3368 03/20/2026 $2,301.20
1767 03/20/2026 $2,896.87
4047 03/20/2026 $1,711.23
4046 03/20/2026 $1,818.46
3627 03/20/2026 $3,455.30
2006 03/20/2026 $3,506.18
1533 03/20/2026 $2,427.83
3761 03/20/2026 $3,318.22
2684 03/20/2026 $1,397.39
4066 03/20/2026 $4,553.06
3923 03/20/2026 $1,669.06
3967 03/20/2026 $1,892.18
3079 03/20/2026 $1,965.50
341484
341485
341486
341479
341480
341481
341482
341483
341474
341475
341476
341477
341478
341469
341470
341471
341472
341473
341464
341465
341466
341467
341468
341459
341460
341461
341462
341463
341454
341455
341456
341457
341458
341449
341450
341451
341452
341453
341447
341448
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 14 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
1966 03/20/2026 $2,646.31
4056 03/20/2026 $2,203.27
3388 03/20/2026 $2,633.92
2355 03/20/2026 $2,416.00
3696 03/20/2026 $3,049.10
3500 03/20/2026 $4,011.21
3620 03/20/2026 $2,136.72
2039 03/20/2026 $2,049.47
3838 03/20/2026 $2,292.23
3281 03/20/2026 $1,980.91
3550 03/20/2026 $3,033.62
3348 03/20/2026 $2,305.37
3862 03/20/2026 $1,599.41
3807 03/20/2026 $2,247.47
3081 03/20/2026 $2,122.40
4055 03/20/2026 $2,157.71
3523 03/20/2026 $5,085.29
3271 03/20/2026 $2,045.13
2330 03/20/2026 $3,705.28
2795 03/20/2026 $1,120.53
3888 03/20/2026 $2,208.08
3437 03/20/2026 $6,053.14
3421 03/20/2026 $3,741.62
3439 03/20/2026 $3,780.20
3440 03/20/2026 $4,186.83
3441 03/20/2026 $3,870.37
3473 03/20/2026 $3,593.23
3820 03/20/2026 $4,058.31
3406 03/20/2026 $2,631.82
3422 03/20/2026 $3,133.49
3442 03/20/2026 $3,595.62
3433 03/20/2026 $3,817.09
3424 03/20/2026 $4,010.22
3414 03/20/2026 $4,618.20
3704 03/20/2026 $4,038.37
3734 03/20/2026 $6,492.57
3832 03/20/2026 $4,135.78
3799 03/20/2026 $3,449.67
3886 03/20/2026 $4,949.25
3859 03/20/2026 $3,633.91
341524
341525
341526
341519
341520
341521
341522
341523
341514
341515
341516
341517
341518
341509
341510
341511
341512
341513
341504
341505
341506
341507
341508
341499
341500
341501
341502
341503
341494
341495
341496
341497
341498
341489
341490
341491
341492
341493
341487
341488
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 15 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
3443 03/20/2026 $6,506.53
3600 03/20/2026 $2,363.65
3711 03/20/2026 $5,275.81
3928 03/20/2026 $4,193.44
3715 03/20/2026 $3,442.93
3444 03/20/2026 $2,602.82
3583 03/20/2026 $2,714.14
3952 03/20/2026 $1,842.27
3594 03/20/2026 $3,689.16
3409 03/20/2026 $2,443.93
3856 03/20/2026 $3,474.05
3426 03/20/2026 $6,751.60
3860 03/20/2026 $3,414.36
3642 03/20/2026 $7,312.54
3996 03/20/2026 $2,640.38
3584 03/20/2026 $2,039.52
3410 03/20/2026 $3,066.11
3828 03/20/2026 $3,783.69
3427 03/20/2026 $6,403.30
3411 03/20/2026 $4,157.93
3448 03/20/2026 $2,427.90
3833 03/20/2026 $2,834.07
3449 03/20/2026 $2,025.72
3428 03/20/2026 $2,347.93
3858 03/20/2026 $2,399.99
3429 03/20/2026 $3,925.20
3451 03/20/2026 $3,617.56
3595 03/20/2026 $3,198.27
3430 03/20/2026 $2,887.62
3452 03/20/2026 $3,684.14
3417 03/20/2026 $3,489.56
3431 03/20/2026 $6,983.63
3242 03/20/2026 $3,076.77
3857 03/20/2026 $1,054.87
4006 03/20/2026 $4,563.55
3419 03/20/2026 $3,992.87
3991 03/20/2026 $2,424.64
4037 03/20/2026 $2,113.81
3524 03/20/2026 $3,356.03
3412 03/20/2026 $5,024.02
341564
341565
341566
341559
341560
341561
341562
341563
341554
341555
341556
341557
341558
341549
341550
341551
341552
341553
341544
341545
341546
341547
341548
341539
341540
341541
341542
341543
341534
341535
341536
341537
341538
341529
341530
341531
341532
341533
341527
341528
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 16 of 18 03/20/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
3829 03/20/2026 $3,022.11
3420 03/20/2026 $4,195.51
3921 03/20/2026 $3,834.93
3435 03/20/2026 $4,229.88
3800 03/20/2026 $1,912.29
3432 03/20/2026 $2,585.73
3408 03/20/2026 $4,721.91
3456 03/20/2026 $4,395.07
3947 03/20/2026 $2,765.24
3763 03/20/2026 $3,701.05
3743 03/20/2026 $2,196.17
3591 03/20/2026 $3,861.04
3855 03/20/2026 $5,550.70
3831 03/20/2026 $3,379.03
3434 03/20/2026 $4,104.74
4045 03/20/2026 $1,279.18
4044 03/20/2026 $977.37
3971 03/20/2026 $1,213.92
4042 03/20/2026 $809.60
4041 03/20/2026 $612.47
4043 03/20/2026 $792.84
4063 04/03/2026 $364.20
Advices Total 1,567,535.39
341584
341585
341586
341587
342171
341579
341580
341581
341582
341583
341574
341575
341576
341577
341578
341569
341570
341571
341572
341573
341567
341568
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 17 of 18 03/20/2026 Payment Date Total Gross
IRS 03/06/2026 $4.88
IRS 03/09/2026 $511.06
IRS 03/16/2026 $592.88
IRS 03/20/2026 $263,464.73
State Taxes 03/17/2026 $180.72
State Taxes 03/20/2026 $77,321.77
CASDU 03/20/2026 $7,206.03
Deferred Comp (457) 03/09/2026 $12.62
Deferred Comp (457) 03/10/2026 $15.00
Deferred Comp (457) 03/23/2026 $100,266.60
Deferred Comp (401a) 03/23/2026 $325.15
PERS 03/17/2026 $1,247.79
PERS 03/27/2026 $395,407.96
Confidential Garnishment 03/19/2026 $423.00
VV Firefighter's Union 03/19/2026 $6,930.00
Electronic Vendor Payments Total 853,910.19
Vendor
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
February 27, 2026 through March 13, 2026
Electronic Vendor Payments
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 18 of 18 03/20/2026 Item Number: 6
City Council / Board of Directors
Consent Calendar
Meeting of: May 19, 2026
Submitted By:
Carmen Cun, Finance Director / City Treasurer
Subject:
Payroll Demand Schedule No. 9B
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors ratify Payroll Demand Schedule No. 9B for the payroll period of March 13, 2026, through March 27, 2026, in total amount of $2,466,138.40. This total includes:
Employee Check Nos. 34840 through 34841 in the amount of $3,356.30. Vendor Check Nos. 34842 through 34850 in the amount of $5,891.60. Advice Nos. 341588 through 342169 in the amount of $1,583,567.58; and Vendor Electronic Payments totaling $873,322.92.
All expenditures are consistent with the adopted Fiscal Year 2025–2026 Budget (covering July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026).
Fiscal Impact:
A total fiscal impact of $2,466,138.40 is authorized with this action. The attached report details all payment types including employee checks, vendor checks, advices, and electronic payments.
Discussion:
I hereby certify that the claims or demands covered by the attached list of warrants have been audited as to the accuracy and availability of funds for payment thereof and that said claims or demands are accurate and the funds are available for payment thereof.
Prepared By:
Kimberly Major, Payroll Specialist
Attachments: A. Payroll Report PPE 032726
Attachment A
Payroll Report PPE 032726
Total Net
$891.74
$2,464.56
3,356.30
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
34840 3466 04/03/2026
Employee Checks
Check Number Employee ID Check Date
Checks Total
34841 3853 04/03/2026
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 1 of 18 04/03/2026 Total Net
$5.00
$50.00
$2,092.33
$50.00
$1,944.93
$542.03
$610.00
$422.31
$175.00
5,891.60
Vendor Checks
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
34842 240 04/03/2026
Check Number Vendor ID Check Date
34843 1182 04/03/2026
34844 1182 04/03/2026
34845 1182 04/03/2026
34846 1182 04/03/2026
34847 1182 04/03/2026
34848 1182 04/03/2026
Checks Total
34849 13491 04/03/2026
34850 18154 04/03/2026
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 2 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total Net
2624 03/27/2026 $15,947.89
3396 04/03/2026 $2,514.17
4048 04/03/2026 $1,663.03
1099 04/03/2026 $1,398.43
3243 04/03/2026 $5,566.73
2115 04/03/2026 $17,899.05
3640 04/03/2026 $589.84
3527 04/03/2026 $2,340.30
3945 04/03/2026 $778.95
3551 04/03/2026 $940.76
3229 04/03/2026 $5,454.14
3918 04/03/2026 $1,315.90
3290 04/03/2026 $2,897.08
4032 04/03/2026 $2,073.55
1064 04/03/2026 $8,450.11
4051 04/03/2026 $768.06
3467 04/03/2026 $1,350.40
3909 04/03/2026 $2,252.81
2395 04/03/2026 $4,615.21
3764 04/03/2026 $2,753.60
2211 04/03/2026 $6,179.23
3747 04/03/2026 $2,244.23
3625 04/03/2026 $951.01
3043 04/03/2026 $2,061.97
3964 04/03/2026 $1,115.33
3403 04/03/2026 $1,901.04
3963 04/03/2026 $1,542.99
3848 04/03/2026 $1,924.32
3957 04/03/2026 $3,529.24
3579 04/03/2026 $1,193.16
4052 04/03/2026 $2,013.49
3931 04/03/2026 $2,227.31
3913 04/03/2026 $2,292.12
3019 04/03/2026 $5,253.22
3638 04/03/2026 $4,091.64
3561 04/03/2026 $2,896.66
3920 04/03/2026 $2,546.20
3630 04/03/2026 $2,165.54
4059 04/03/2026 $1,285.60
3750 04/03/2026 $2,204.65
Check Number
341588
341589
341590
341591
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
341597
341598
341599
341600
341601
341592
341593
341594
341595
341596
341607
341608
341609
341610
341611
341602
341603
341604
341605
341606
341617
341618
341619
341620
341621
341612
341613
341614
341615
341616
341627
341622
341623
341624
341625
341626
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 3 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
4058 04/03/2026 $1,972.60
3521 04/03/2026 $2,790.92
2019 04/03/2026 $2,646.29
3753 04/03/2026 $3,287.78
3915 04/03/2026 $4,621.36
3917 04/03/2026 $2,188.11
3744 04/03/2026 $2,562.86
2606 04/03/2026 $2,496.28
3660 04/03/2026 $1,971.27
3914 04/03/2026 $2,425.44
1635 04/03/2026 $4,351.81
3327 04/03/2026 $2,629.31
3752 04/03/2026 $2,224.79
3912 04/03/2026 $1,662.32
4060 04/03/2026 $1,556.95
3727 04/03/2026 $1,028.80
4035 04/03/2026 $2,476.91
3911 04/03/2026 $2,096.08
2618 04/03/2026 $2,660.42
4039 04/03/2026 $2,510.29
3845 04/03/2026 $3,767.05
2619 04/03/2026 $2,547.80
3586 04/03/2026 $2,472.13
2093 04/03/2026 $1,847.76
3916 04/03/2026 $2,628.49
3889 04/03/2026 $2,235.31
3045 04/03/2026 $2,353.14
3755 04/03/2026 $2,270.11
3608 04/03/2026 $5,137.82
3758 04/03/2026 $4,395.56
3817 04/03/2026 $2,255.73
3953 04/03/2026 $1,445.65
3362 04/03/2026 $2,883.17
2297 04/03/2026 $2,277.78
2232 04/03/2026 $3,238.73
1957 04/03/2026 $3,117.17
3085 04/03/2026 $2,425.33
3714 04/03/2026 $2,388.00
3742 04/03/2026 $2,283.34
3863 04/03/2026 $2,718.75
341628
341629
341630
341631
341637
341638
341639
341640
341641
341632
341633
341634
341635
341636
341647
341648
341649
341650
341651
341642
341643
341644
341645
341646
341657
341658
341659
341660
341661
341652
341653
341654
341655
341656
341667
341662
341663
341664
341665
341666
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 4 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
3879 04/03/2026 $2,200.68
3846 04/03/2026 $4,244.66
3987 04/03/2026 $2,600.80
3868 04/03/2026 $2,927.61
2102 04/03/2026 $3,685.55
2233 04/03/2026 $3,119.14
4071 04/03/2026 $2,130.36
3997 04/03/2026 $2,438.45
3865 04/03/2026 $2,415.85
2032 04/03/2026 $4,163.99
3499 04/03/2026 $2,707.90
3703 04/03/2026 $2,254.22
2323 04/03/2026 $3,906.15
3502 04/03/2026 $2,765.00
3508 04/03/2026 $2,927.99
2225 04/03/2026 $4,635.65
3221 04/03/2026 $2,916.35
3757 04/03/2026 $3,737.00
3998 04/03/2026 $3,092.57
3700 04/03/2026 $2,402.97
3966 04/03/2026 $2,347.96
2254 04/03/2026 $3,412.14
3618 04/03/2026 $2,618.04
3354 04/03/2026 $4,117.97
3400 04/03/2026 $2,973.11
3933 04/03/2026 $1,174.56
3544 04/03/2026 $2,356.18
4057 04/03/2026 $515.15
2742 04/03/2026 $2,988.45
3934 04/03/2026 $4,273.59
3746 04/03/2026 $2,421.68
3089 04/03/2026 $3,521.34
3641 04/03/2026 $2,314.42
3854 04/03/2026 $2,570.87
3634 04/03/2026 $2,810.47
3805 04/03/2026 $2,972.30
2249 04/03/2026 $5,133.54
3650 04/03/2026 $2,013.48
3938 04/03/2026 $1,769.25
3576 04/03/2026 $2,047.45
341668
341669
341670
341671
341677
341678
341679
341680
341681
341672
341673
341674
341675
341676
341687
341688
341689
341690
341691
341682
341683
341684
341685
341686
341697
341698
341699
341700
341701
341692
341693
341694
341695
341696
341707
341702
341703
341704
341705
341706
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 5 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
3876 04/03/2026 $2,612.63
3663 04/03/2026 $1,922.99
3541 04/03/2026 $3,171.24
2499 04/03/2026 $4,319.03
3379 04/03/2026 $2,968.69
3694 04/03/2026 $2,479.17
4004 04/03/2026 $756.41
3737 04/03/2026 $2,938.86
2105 04/03/2026 $5,231.78
3474 04/03/2026 $3,022.49
4038 04/03/2026 $2,011.26
2515 04/03/2026 $3,762.23
3636 04/03/2026 $3,018.87
2679 04/03/2026 $3,433.64
3490 04/03/2026 $2,780.19
3475 04/03/2026 $2,683.00
2181 04/03/2026 $3,564.35
3880 04/03/2026 $1,288.13
3542 04/03/2026 $3,325.87
3731 04/03/2026 $2,064.71
1955 04/03/2026 $3,697.09
3943 04/03/2026 $2,667.48
3719 04/03/2026 $2,238.47
1632 04/03/2026 $2,972.22
3736 04/03/2026 $3,106.10
3692 04/03/2026 $3,274.57
3147 04/03/2026 $1,991.60
3881 04/03/2026 $1,272.02
3732 04/03/2026 $2,977.13
3944 04/03/2026 $1,243.92
3148 04/03/2026 $2,901.91
3808 04/03/2026 $3,828.26
3195 04/03/2026 $2,327.94
3884 04/03/2026 $1,272.02
4005 04/03/2026 $1,364.97
3353 04/03/2026 $2,714.58
3626 04/03/2026 $2,728.02
3602 04/03/2026 $3,035.27
3112 04/03/2026 $2,218.54
3185 04/03/2026 $2,736.63
341708
341709
341710
341711
341717
341718
341719
341720
341721
341712
341713
341714
341715
341716
341727
341728
341729
341730
341731
341722
341723
341724
341725
341726
341737
341738
341739
341740
341741
341732
341733
341734
341735
341736
341747
341742
341743
341744
341745
341746
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 6 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
2605 04/03/2026 $2,281.61
3505 04/03/2026 $3,604.54
2377 04/03/2026 $2,900.89
4049 04/03/2026 $2,829.25
4002 04/03/2026 $2,483.34
2259 04/03/2026 $4,853.77
3637 04/03/2026 $1,943.07
3628 04/03/2026 $2,796.02
3068 04/03/2026 $2,116.94
3702 04/03/2026 $2,390.86
3633 04/03/2026 $2,956.07
3129 04/03/2026 $3,960.61
3816 04/03/2026 $3,225.27
3543 04/03/2026 $2,961.93
3303 04/03/2026 $4,269.24
3802 04/03/2026 $2,834.92
3558 04/03/2026 $3,026.46
1655 04/03/2026 $5,274.32
4008 04/03/2026 $2,745.96
1776 04/03/2026 $3,252.84
2600 04/03/2026 $3,623.13
2655 04/03/2026 $1,589.15
3393 04/03/2026 $2,452.69
3749 04/03/2026 $2,605.04
2522 04/03/2026 $4,263.97
2339 04/03/2026 $2,446.95
3878 04/03/2026 $3,620.48
1503 04/03/2026 $3,037.42
2505 04/03/2026 $3,181.99
1970 04/03/2026 $2,377.85
3113 04/03/2026 $2,070.87
1520 04/03/2026 $2,517.66
3273 04/03/2026 $2,386.84
3821 04/03/2026 $2,038.26
1497 04/03/2026 $3,497.52
3537 04/03/2026 $3,385.49
2540 04/03/2026 $3,795.18
3513 04/03/2026 $2,654.41
3685 04/03/2026 $2,013.24
2034 04/03/2026 $2,736.75
341748
341749
341750
341751
341757
341758
341759
341760
341761
341752
341753
341754
341755
341756
341767
341768
341769
341770
341771
341762
341763
341764
341765
341766
341777
341778
341779
341780
341781
341772
341773
341774
341775
341776
341787
341782
341783
341784
341785
341786
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 7 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
3380 04/03/2026 $2,369.77
3792 04/03/2026 $1,636.86
3871 04/03/2026 $2,407.72
3852 04/03/2026 $1,731.71
3051 04/03/2026 $2,538.49
1750 04/03/2026 $3,086.13
2770 04/03/2026 $2,019.31
4068 04/03/2026 $1,814.41
2228 04/03/2026 $3,044.75
3827 04/03/2026 $3,735.69
3726 04/03/2026 $3,033.51
3748 04/03/2026 $2,242.79
3101 04/03/2026 $2,718.55
3335 04/03/2026 $2,734.60
3284 04/03/2026 $2,334.46
3840 04/03/2026 $3,801.53
2312 04/03/2026 $2,331.21
3510 04/03/2026 $2,969.11
2248 04/03/2026 $2,088.53
3622 04/03/2026 $2,763.08
3788 04/03/2026 $1,815.08
2189 04/03/2026 $3,640.61
3560 04/03/2026 $2,132.63
3509 04/03/2026 $2,481.80
4062 04/03/2026 $2,212.17
1121 04/03/2026 $2,600.96
3968 04/03/2026 $2,823.69
3149 04/03/2026 $4,046.82
1865 04/03/2026 $2,402.30
3479 04/03/2026 $2,137.65
1723 04/03/2026 $2,465.57
3707 04/03/2026 $2,154.72
3572 04/03/2026 $2,023.53
2531 04/03/2026 $3,802.04
1513 04/03/2026 $2,952.57
3283 04/03/2026 $3,729.70
2118 04/03/2026 $1,625.81
3387 04/03/2026 $1,888.70
3330 04/03/2026 $2,654.85
2681 04/03/2026 $4,280.41
341788
341789
341790
341791
341797
341798
341799
341800
341801
341792
341793
341794
341795
341796
341807
341808
341809
341810
341811
341802
341803
341804
341805
341806
341817
341818
341819
341820
341821
341812
341813
341814
341815
341816
341827
341822
341823
341824
341825
341826
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 8 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
3988 04/03/2026 $3,842.58
1612 04/03/2026 $1,866.24
3610 04/03/2026 $1,739.98
3277 04/03/2026 $2,238.08
3287 04/03/2026 $2,236.11
3037 04/03/2026 $2,248.06
1449 04/03/2026 $3,144.77
2111 04/03/2026 $2,876.04
2677 04/03/2026 $6,043.78
3984 04/03/2026 $3,382.59
3688 04/03/2026 $2,000.95
3341 04/03/2026 $3,934.58
2383 04/03/2026 $2,133.93
3687 04/03/2026 $2,954.46
3130 04/03/2026 $2,243.66
2489 04/03/2026 $4,001.46
4067 04/03/2026 $1,775.21
3733 04/03/2026 $2,011.28
3361 04/03/2026 $2,792.29
3285 04/03/2026 $5,184.43
1529 04/03/2026 $2,120.14
3624 04/03/2026 $2,006.05
3139 04/03/2026 $1,916.30
3099 04/03/2026 $2,802.20
4069 04/03/2026 $1,737.91
3994 04/03/2026 $2,346.47
3346 04/03/2026 $2,045.95
3969 04/03/2026 $2,201.70
3536 04/03/2026 $3,323.31
3722 04/03/2026 $2,517.50
1254 04/03/2026 $2,289.10
3187 04/03/2026 $2,209.53
3804 04/03/2026 $2,685.61
2368 04/03/2026 $2,178.70
3532 04/03/2026 $1,521.92
3192 04/03/2026 $2,234.49
3100 04/03/2026 $3,388.58
3796 04/03/2026 $1,664.78
1338 04/03/2026 $4,010.15
2229 04/03/2026 $2,228.65
341828
341829
341830
341831
341837
341838
341839
341840
341841
341832
341833
341834
341835
341836
341847
341848
341849
341850
341851
341842
341843
341844
341845
341846
341857
341858
341859
341860
341861
341852
341853
341854
341855
341856
341867
341862
341863
341864
341865
341866
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 9 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
4001 04/03/2026 $4,025.54
1049 04/03/2026 $2,474.01
1506 04/03/2026 $2,028.56
3004 04/03/2026 $2,447.28
2833 04/03/2026 $2,521.02
3794 04/03/2026 $2,042.39
2798 04/03/2026 $2,463.93
3265 04/03/2026 $2,099.84
1932 04/03/2026 $2,751.00
3279 04/03/2026 $2,072.02
2460 04/03/2026 $2,423.77
3874 04/03/2026 $2,578.40
3671 04/03/2026 $1,907.19
2732 04/03/2026 $1,986.38
3823 04/03/2026 $1,882.30
3338 04/03/2026 $1,734.94
2552 04/03/2026 $2,017.75
2476 04/03/2026 $3,995.87
2279 04/03/2026 $2,484.51
3515 04/03/2026 $6,437.06
3092 04/03/2026 $2,870.44
3836 04/03/2026 $2,222.29
3138 04/03/2026 $3,396.96
3512 04/03/2026 $2,541.07
3146 04/03/2026 $3,837.76
2590 04/03/2026 $2,684.10
2748 04/03/2026 $2,295.52
3709 04/03/2026 $4,338.35
2669 04/03/2026 $3,713.60
2623 04/03/2026 $2,189.74
2637 04/03/2026 $2,441.57
3972 04/03/2026 $5,178.61
2638 04/03/2026 $4,542.78
3803 04/03/2026 $2,413.14
3109 04/03/2026 $3,007.32
2671 04/03/2026 $3,997.93
2593 04/03/2026 $2,864.38
3328 04/03/2026 $2,521.20
3461 04/03/2026 $2,144.00
2626 04/03/2026 $2,279.11
341868
341869
341870
341871
341877
341878
341879
341880
341881
341872
341873
341874
341875
341876
341887
341888
341889
341890
341891
341882
341883
341884
341885
341886
341897
341898
341899
341900
341901
341892
341893
341894
341895
341896
341907
341902
341903
341904
341905
341906
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 10 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
3621 04/03/2026 $2,334.35
3937 04/03/2026 $2,323.84
3038 04/03/2026 $2,864.05
3052 04/03/2026 $2,127.69
2290 04/03/2026 $2,279.89
3716 04/03/2026 $2,933.05
3110 04/03/2026 $4,182.21
2641 04/03/2026 $299.73
2612 04/03/2026 $2,689.96
2642 04/03/2026 $2,229.27
3705 04/03/2026 $2,842.67
3331 04/03/2026 $2,101.04
2674 04/03/2026 $2,839.38
3231 04/03/2026 $2,528.40
3228 04/03/2026 $2,935.11
2628 04/03/2026 $2,683.99
2630 04/03/2026 $3,043.25
3182 04/03/2026 $2,941.68
2599 04/03/2026 $2,872.76
2683 04/03/2026 $3,098.84
2753 04/03/2026 $2,313.97
2610 04/03/2026 $2,776.06
3323 04/03/2026 $2,128.72
1389 04/03/2026 $2,629.15
2808 04/03/2026 $2,132.49
2646 04/03/2026 $2,518.77
3617 04/03/2026 $2,403.88
4070 04/03/2026 $2,232.34
2524 04/03/2026 $3,146.90
2686 04/03/2026 $2,327.96
3942 04/03/2026 $2,329.75
3951 04/03/2026 $1,945.38
2193 04/03/2026 $2,998.04
3629 04/03/2026 $3,008.65
3230 04/03/2026 $3,777.60
2038 04/03/2026 $1,863.48
3985 04/03/2026 $1,979.16
2678 04/03/2026 $4,503.56
3240 04/03/2026 $3,143.85
4040 04/03/2026 $1,771.86
341908
341909
341910
341911
341917
341918
341919
341920
341921
341912
341913
341914
341915
341916
341927
341928
341929
341930
341931
341922
341923
341924
341925
341926
341937
341938
341939
341940
341941
341932
341933
341934
341935
341936
341947
341942
341943
341944
341945
341946
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 11 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
3215 04/03/2026 $3,149.95
3140 04/03/2026 $2,480.88
3035 04/03/2026 $1,854.77
4020 04/03/2026 $1,302.88
3651 04/03/2026 $2,503.55
3299 04/03/2026 $2,477.64
4015 04/03/2026 $1,257.96
4036 04/03/2026 $1,333.83
1853 04/03/2026 $3,066.12
3729 04/03/2026 $1,866.33
2343 04/03/2026 $1,739.24
3959 04/03/2026 $1,301.93
3497 04/03/2026 $1,877.79
1426 04/03/2026 $1,189.92
3105 04/03/2026 $1,930.34
4010 04/03/2026 $1,348.67
3386 04/03/2026 $2,917.90
3191 04/03/2026 $2,413.50
3922 04/03/2026 $1,738.97
2488 04/03/2026 $1,228.25
3496 04/03/2026 $1,434.11
4021 04/03/2026 $936.62
3482 04/03/2026 $1,969.45
3611 04/03/2026 $1,738.37
3724 04/03/2026 $1,243.92
3011 04/03/2026 $1,772.78
3623 04/03/2026 $1,866.87
3768 04/03/2026 $393.88
4016 04/03/2026 $1,333.83
3580 04/03/2026 $2,086.42
3905 04/03/2026 $295.42
3939 04/03/2026 $2,341.70
3873 04/03/2026 $2,051.08
3270 04/03/2026 $2,175.52
4000 04/03/2026 $2,158.86
3263 04/03/2026 $1,995.01
3795 04/03/2026 $2,152.20
3252 04/03/2026 $2,841.30
3295 04/03/2026 $2,772.27
3257 04/03/2026 $2,696.27
341948
341949
341950
341951
341957
341958
341959
341960
341961
341952
341953
341954
341955
341956
341967
341968
341969
341970
341971
341962
341963
341964
341965
341966
341977
341978
341979
341980
341981
341972
341973
341974
341975
341976
341987
341982
341983
341984
341985
341986
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 12 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
3184 04/03/2026 $3,665.70
3070 04/03/2026 $2,257.17
3689 04/03/2026 $1,872.90
3898 04/03/2026 $221.56
4012 04/03/2026 $1,364.97
3288 04/03/2026 $2,099.95
3767 04/03/2026 $926.62
1866 04/03/2026 $3,229.02
3774 04/03/2026 $549.79
3791 04/03/2026 $1,257.96
3950 04/03/2026 $3,688.16
3936 04/03/2026 $1,257.95
3772 04/03/2026 $558.00
3340 04/03/2026 $1,237.03
3766 04/03/2026 $1,071.93
3822 04/03/2026 $1,257.95
1282 04/03/2026 $2,508.11
3481 04/03/2026 $2,171.13
2379 04/03/2026 $2,357.82
4028 04/03/2026 $1,257.96
3813 04/03/2026 $1,022.54
3672 04/03/2026 $1,272.02
3656 04/03/2026 $1,163.60
3789 04/03/2026 $4,601.93
4018 04/03/2026 $1,333.84
3970 04/03/2026 $1,252.12
3793 04/03/2026 $2,078.91
3775 04/03/2026 $533.38
2478 04/03/2026 $1,208.19
3919 04/03/2026 $1,066.60
1287 04/03/2026 $3,498.84
3477 04/03/2026 $795.36
3973 04/03/2026 $2,148.41
4064 04/03/2026 $2,109.87
4014 04/03/2026 $1,257.96
2711 04/03/2026 $1,689.41
3900 04/03/2026 $262.59
3798 04/03/2026 $1,250.96
3258 04/03/2026 $2,098.45
4017 04/03/2026 $1,257.96
341988
341989
341990
341991
341997
341998
341999
342000
342001
341992
341993
341994
341995
341996
342007
342008
342009
342010
342011
342002
342003
342004
342005
342006
342017
342018
342019
342020
342021
342012
342013
342014
342015
342016
342027
342022
342023
342024
342025
342026
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 13 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
3259 04/03/2026 $1,797.60
4031 04/03/2026 $1,333.83
3507 04/03/2026 $2,670.59
3790 04/03/2026 $1,305.52
3531 04/03/2026 $3,757.65
3655 04/03/2026 $1,506.69
3897 04/03/2026 $521.08
3814 04/03/2026 $1,068.10
3639 04/03/2026 $1,605.88
3587 04/03/2026 $1,035.64
3901 04/03/2026 $209.25
3029 04/03/2026 $2,415.40
3190 04/03/2026 $3,071.66
1959 04/03/2026 $3,419.02
3250 04/03/2026 $1,950.30
3824 04/03/2026 $1,257.96
4007 04/03/2026 $2,657.36
3609 04/03/2026 $1,690.63
3492 04/03/2026 $768.34
3866 04/03/2026 $1,246.08
3910 04/03/2026 $1,045.23
3725 04/03/2026 $1,175.68
3647 04/03/2026 $131.29
3777 04/03/2026 $500.56
4033 04/03/2026 $2,203.12
4011 04/03/2026 $1,333.83
3867 04/03/2026 $1,552.90
3368 04/03/2026 $2,301.20
1767 04/03/2026 $2,896.87
4047 04/03/2026 $1,711.23
4046 04/03/2026 $1,818.46
3627 04/03/2026 $3,455.30
2006 04/03/2026 $3,506.19
1533 04/03/2026 $2,427.83
3761 04/03/2026 $3,318.22
2684 04/03/2026 $1,397.39
4066 04/03/2026 $4,553.06
3923 04/03/2026 $1,669.05
3967 04/03/2026 $1,892.18
3079 04/03/2026 $1,965.50
342028
342029
342030
342031
342037
342038
342039
342040
342041
342032
342033
342034
342035
342036
342047
342048
342049
342050
342051
342042
342043
342044
342045
342046
342057
342058
342059
342060
342061
342052
342053
342054
342055
342056
342067
342062
342063
342064
342065
342066
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 14 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
1966 04/03/2026 $3,028.02
4056 04/03/2026 $2,213.92
3388 04/03/2026 $2,633.92
2355 04/03/2026 $2,377.37
3696 04/03/2026 $3,049.09
3500 04/03/2026 $4,011.21
3620 04/03/2026 $2,136.72
2039 04/03/2026 $2,049.47
3838 04/03/2026 $2,292.23
3281 04/03/2026 $1,980.91
3550 04/03/2026 $3,254.15
3348 04/03/2026 $2,177.85
3862 04/03/2026 $1,599.41
3807 04/03/2026 $2,592.17
3081 04/03/2026 $2,147.18
4055 04/03/2026 $2,180.12
3523 04/03/2026 $5,085.29
3271 04/03/2026 $2,045.13
2330 04/03/2026 $3,791.17
2795 04/03/2026 $1,120.53
3888 04/03/2026 $2,124.24
3437 04/03/2026 $5,273.90
3421 04/03/2026 $5,489.11
3439 04/03/2026 $2,027.24
3440 04/03/2026 $4,853.09
3441 04/03/2026 $2,423.21
3473 04/03/2026 $3,972.56
3820 04/03/2026 $4,514.79
3406 04/03/2026 $5,804.34
3422 04/03/2026 $6,399.07
3442 04/03/2026 $6,167.76
3433 04/03/2026 $2,544.04
3424 04/03/2026 $3,303.85
3414 04/03/2026 $6,624.24
3704 04/03/2026 $1,972.92
3734 04/03/2026 $6,492.57
3832 04/03/2026 $4,557.38
3799 04/03/2026 $3,726.77
3886 04/03/2026 $7,581.32
3859 04/03/2026 $5,145.69
342068
342069
342070
342071
342077
342078
342079
342080
342081
342072
342073
342074
342075
342076
342087
342088
342089
342090
342091
342082
342083
342084
342085
342086
342097
342098
342099
342100
342101
342092
342093
342094
342095
342096
342107
342102
342103
342104
342105
342106
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 15 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
3443 04/03/2026 $3,279.97
3600 04/03/2026 $5,077.93
3711 04/03/2026 $3,010.58
3928 04/03/2026 $4,193.44
3715 04/03/2026 $3,240.70
3444 04/03/2026 $4,947.17
3583 04/03/2026 $5,629.51
3952 04/03/2026 $1,753.97
3594 04/03/2026 $4,299.01
3409 04/03/2026 $3,833.75
3856 04/03/2026 $3,882.25
3426 04/03/2026 $3,249.86
3860 04/03/2026 $5,106.49
3642 04/03/2026 $3,432.74
3996 04/03/2026 $3,855.91
3584 04/03/2026 $4,586.59
3410 04/03/2026 $5,132.09
3828 04/03/2026 $7,279.47
3427 04/03/2026 $3,709.93
3411 04/03/2026 $4,351.21
3448 04/03/2026 $3,548.19
3833 04/03/2026 $3,209.93
3449 04/03/2026 $3,462.41
3428 04/03/2026 $3,907.61
3858 04/03/2026 $3,353.02
3429 04/03/2026 $2,709.13
3451 04/03/2026 $3,309.84
3595 04/03/2026 $2,252.10
3430 04/03/2026 $4,708.27
3452 04/03/2026 $3,996.66
3417 04/03/2026 $4,629.11
3431 04/03/2026 $6,616.19
3242 04/03/2026 $3,076.77
3857 04/03/2026 $878.76
4006 04/03/2026 $4,030.87
3419 04/03/2026 $2,660.62
3991 04/03/2026 $2,211.26
4037 04/03/2026 $2,113.81
3524 04/03/2026 $4,471.34
3412 04/03/2026 $5,024.02
342108
342109
342110
342111
342117
342118
342119
342120
342121
342112
342113
342114
342115
342116
342127
342128
342129
342130
342131
342122
342123
342124
342125
342126
342137
342138
342139
342140
342141
342132
342133
342134
342135
342136
342147
342142
342143
342144
342145
342146
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 16 of 18 04/03/2026 Employee ID Advice Date Total NetCheck Number
Advices
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
3829 04/03/2026 $3,566.22
3420 04/03/2026 $3,588.55
3921 04/03/2026 $4,075.45
3435 04/03/2026 $3,909.98
3800 04/03/2026 $6,526.71
3432 04/03/2026 $4,239.58
3408 04/03/2026 $2,787.34
3456 04/03/2026 $2,231.52
3947 04/03/2026 $2,543.77
3763 04/03/2026 $3,701.05
3743 04/03/2026 $2,196.17
3591 04/03/2026 $6,129.19
3855 04/03/2026 $3,650.34
3831 04/03/2026 $2,363.60
3434 04/03/2026 $3,834.67
4045 04/03/2026 $1,123.59
4044 04/03/2026 $977.37
3971 04/03/2026 $1,227.96
4042 04/03/2026 $776.06
4041 04/03/2026 $612.47
4043 04/03/2026 $646.88
3502 04/03/2026 $98.10
Advices Total 1,583,567.58
342148
342149
342150
342151
342157
342158
342159
342160
342161
342152
342153
342154
342155
342156
342167
342168
342169
342162
342163
342164
342165
342166
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 17 of 18 04/03/2026 Payment Date Total Gross
IRS 03/30/2026 $1,012.94
IRS 04/03/2026 $265,238.27
State Taxes 04/06/2026 $77,281.55
CASDU 04/06/2026 $7,172.22
Deferred Comp (457) 03/30/2026 $18,112.37
Deferred Comp (457) 04/07/2026 $101,430.09
Deferred Comp (401a) 04/07/2026 $384.04
PERS 04/17/2026 $395,338.44
Confidential Garnishment 04/02/2026 $423.00
VV Firefighter's Union 04/02/2026 $6,930.00
Electronic Vendor Payments Total 873,322.92
Vendor
Electronic Vendor Payments
City of Victorville
City Council Payroll Report
March 13, 2026 through March 27, 2026
City of Victorville Council Payroll Report Page 18 of 18 04/03/2026 Item Number: 7
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: May 19, 2026
Submitted By:
Keith C. Metzler, City Manager
Subject:
General Transaction and Use Tax - Infrastructure and Public Services Recommendation:
That your Honorable City Council direct staff to proceed with the next steps that will place a 1% sales tax measure on the November 2026 ballot.
Fiscal Impact:
No fiscal impact associated with this item at this time.
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Goal A, Financial Sustainability, which focuses on fostering fiscal health through disciplined long-term planning, cost control and increased revenues.
Background:
At the regularly scheduled meeting of November 18, 2025, staff were directed to begin the steps necessary to place a general transaction and use tax measure on the November ballot. It also directed staff to develop a plan that evaluates the need for a new tax measure and retain outside help with communications.
Discussion:
Since that time, staff retained Tripepi Smith and FM 3 to both help develop a communication program and to conduct voter surveys to determine voter sentiment about a new tax measure. Staff also assembled an internal team from the executive and leadership teams, along with members of our aspiring leader’s talent development team to evaluate public infrastructure deficiencies throughout the city and then determine if sufficient funding exists to adequately solve our public infrastructure deficiencies. The enclosed infrastructure analysis evaluated the necessary infrastructure to expand public safety services (police, fire and paramedics) to improve and preserve ground water 4 7
1 0
quality and supply, repair streets, potholes, and improve roadway safety, increase parks, recreation and children’s play spaces.
In summary, the infrastructure needs analysis calculated an estimated $865 million in infrastructure needs and a plan that could fund up to an estimated $404 million within the first 10 years of the measure. Broken down, that plan could include:
1. Police and Fire Stations $108.1 million
2. Roadway and Safety Improvements $169.6 million
3. Stormwater / Water Quality $36.6 million
4. Parks, Recreation and Children Play Space $40.7 million
5. Reliable Groundwater Supply $48.9 million
All infrastructure improvements were analyzed to include only those improvements that are necessary before we can further enhance our public services. As an example, police, fire and paramedic response times, due in large part to our population growth, can’t be further improved until facility space is constructed to be able to house the public safety responders. In closing, this report concludes that there is a need for additional funding if the public wants to experience an enhancement to our public services. Accordingly, staff believe it is appropriate that currently the Council consider placement of a ballot measure and include our registered voters in the decision-making process. Staff will remain available for any questions or comments you may have.
Prepared By:
Melissa Williams, Administrative Analyst
Attachments: A. Infrastructure & Service Expansion Needs Analysis Attachment A
Infrastructure &
Service Expansion
Needs Analysis
�"' •• ., ,,"! ·,;
�
i
·<ffc��-""
,J;
l
,..•,,.••
o
•
l
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary Pg. 3-8
Overview Pg. 9-13
Chapter 1: Repair Streets, Fix
Potholes, and Improve Roadway
Safety
Pg. 14-25
Chapter 2: Expand Law
Enforcement and Increase Traffic
Pg. 26-33
Safety
Chapter 3: Expand Fire and
Paramedic Services to Improve
Emergency Response Times
Pg. 34-42
Chapter 4: Improve Stormwater
Drainage and Ensure a Safe,
Clean Drinking Water Supply
Pg. 43-57
Chapter 5: Increase Parks,
Recreation, and Children’s Play
Areas
Pg. 58-63
Financial Needs Pg. 64-70
Financial Planning Pg. 71
Exhibits Pg. 72-86
2 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On November 18, 2025, the Victorville City Council directed the City Manager to begin taking the steps necessary to place a general transaction and use tax on the ballot for the November 2026 election and that those steps include, but not be limited to, the preparation of a plan that demonstrates the need for additional funding. This direction was the result of several discussions over the preceding three years where staff had advised that funding did not exist to adequately rehabilitate existing, and construct new, public infrastructure that is necessary to satisfy the service needs expected from our community. Accordingly, City staff have developed this public infrastructure analysis to summarize costs, funds needed, and expected outcomes from these public infrastructure investments. Altogether, this report will demonstrate an ability to:
1. Repair Streets, Fix Potholes, and Improve Roadway Safety
2. Expand Law Enforcement and Increase Traffic Safety
3. Expand and Maintain Fire and Paramedic Services to Improve Emergency Response Times
4. Improve Stormwater Drainage and Ensure a Safe, Clean Drinking Water Supply
5. Increase Parks, Recreation, and Children's Play Areas This report also reviews the City's financial position and looks at the major funds that make up the City's budget to determine if there is capacity to take on major capital improvement projects that are necessary to expand services to its residents. Altogether, it is the purpose of this report to provide information to the Victorville City Council so that it can make an informed decision about capital investments and what outcomes can be expected from such investments.
3 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
1. Repair Streets, Fix Potholes, and Improve Roadway Safety Victorville maintains 479 center-line miles of public streets that serve both local and regional traffic. Annually, the City evaluates the pavement condition of its roadway system and utilizes a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) as a measurement. The current PCI is 65.7, which is the equivalent to a letter grade of D. Though industry standards will define a PCI of 65 as "Fair", it's a rating that finds a road as already deteriorating and approaching a lesser condition at an accelerated rate. Only maintenance through rehabilitation or reconstruction can overcome roadway deterioration. At the current budget level of $7 million for pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction, the PCI is expected to decline by up to two points per year in the immediate term. To stop the decline in PCI, funds available for roadway improvements would have to increase by $13 million annually.
Roadway safety improvements are also identified as necessary. However, current funding has been proven insufficient to keep up with the need for roadway pedestrian safety improvements. As population growth continues, both in Victorville and throughout the entire Victor Valley, travel patterns have become more complex and have created several roadway safety challenges including vehicle collisions, pedestrian safety risks, and congestion along major travel corridors. To mitigate population and traffic growth, as an example, over recent years the City has constructed several traffic signals at intersections, installed crosswalks with rectangular rapid flashing beacons, and constructed a new roadway corridor.
Altogether, these improvements have helped diversify the flow of traffic, keep traffic flowing, and improved safety at intersections as well as near schools and parks. 4 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
2. Expand Law Enforcement and Increase Traffic Safety
Since 2019, the City has made investments to support and sustain an increase in police department staffing levels. As a result, response times for non-priority calls were reduced by 40%, the number of traffic citations issued increased 220%, and the number of fatal collisions reduced by 15%. Added investments were made, as the City implemented Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) cameras, gunshot detection systems, and drone first responder technology to better respond to and solve crimes more quickly. Resulting from these investments, the number of patrol beats increased from a 6-beat patrol to an 8-beat patrol and proactive call response increased by 73%.
With the addition of law enforcement personnel, there now exists physical limitations at the existing police station that is preventing the City from adding more police officers. To address these limitations, the City has purchased property and is nearing the completion of a design for a new 40,000 square foot police station. The new police station will integrate all forms of technology into a real-time crime viewing station and be large enough to accommodate the doubling of current staffing levels. A new police station is currently estimated to cost $72 million, with $52 million currently unfunded. Cash flows of the General Fund, Measure P Fund, and Public Buildings Development Impact Fee Fund have all been analyzed and this study has determined that there are not sufficient funds to take on this capital expense. Expected outcomes resulting from this proposed capital investment will be increased traffic enforcement to address speeding and unsafe driving, improving 911 police response times, the addition of police officers, and helping to keep public areas safe. 5 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
3. Expand and Maintain Fire and Paramedic Services to Improve Emergency Response Times
Since 2019, paramedic and fire service response times have improved as the result of investments made, including opening a new fire station and the addition of two new medic squads. These investments were made to address the service level gaps that were found in the Public Safety Plan. Due to increases in population and calls for service, new service coverage gaps exist that will negatively affect paramedic and fire response times if not properly addressed. Currently, average response times for medical and fire calls are 6.32 minutes and 7.76 minutes, respectively. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) response goals suggest an initial response travel time of approximately four minutes for emergency incidents.
A recently commissioned Standard of Cover (SOC) evaluated how effective the department is in using its resources to respond to service calls. The SOC identified two general locations where service calls were putting undue strain on the ability to respond with the apparatus assigned to the respective Fire Management Zone (FMZ). In FMZ 313, the assigned engine company experiences a high volume of calls to the Palmdale Road/Highway 395 corridor, requiring coverage from another FMZ. In FMZ 314, because of its station location, the Nisqualli Road/Interstate 15 corridor is often responded to by a unit from another FMZ as it is the closest available resource.
To maintain public safety and improve response times, Fire Station 313 needs to be expanded to house a paramedic squad, and two fire stations need to be constructed at the corridors in two newly created FMZs, to be referred to as FMZ 316 and 317. Station costs are currently estimated at $38.9 million, and associated staffing is estimated at $3.6 million per year. With these investments, response times are estimated to improve approximately 3 to 5 minutes. 6 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
4. Improve Stormwater Drainage and Ensure a Safe, Clean Drinking Water Supply
Victorville supplies water to its residents from the Mojave River Basin (MRB) to meet drinking and irrigation water demands. It provides this service through a series of extraction wells (34), storage tanks (26), and pipelines (776-miles), connecting and providing customer service through a meter. The MRB primarily relies on groundwater recharge from rainwater events and the purchase of replacement water from the California state aqueduct to keep the MRB in balance. The free production of groundwater is becoming increasingly constrained as population growth increases and groundwater recharge through rainwater events stay flat or decreases. Currently, Victorville's Free Production Allowance (FPA) from the MRP amounts to 50% of the value of its Base Annual Production (BAP). This means that Victorville can only freely pump one half of its water rights. Additionally, it's noted that since the 2022-23 water year, the FPA has been reduced by 7.35%.
To keep up with demand, Victorville is going to have to reduce its dependency on groundwater by promoting conservation, improving stormwater capture and groundwater recharge, and increasing the use of reclaimed water for irrigation purposes. It can also improve water quality through a series of stormwater drainage related improvements. The most critical stormwater drainage-related improvements determined necessary currently amount to approximately $31 million. Reclaimed water improvements that are necessary in the first phase of system development include storage and distribution pipelines and are currently estimated at $42 million. Both water quality and water supply related improvements do not have funding sources.
7 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
5. Increase Parks, Recreation, and Children's Play Areas Victorville's park, recreation, and children's play areas consist of 316 acres, including 19 parks and one 18-hole golf course. At these facilities, there are 24 baseball fields, 18 playgrounds, 10 tennis courts, 9 soccer/football fields, 5 walking loops, 2 gymnasiums, 2 fitness courses, l aquatic facility, and l trail system. When comparing these facilities on a per capita basis to standards created by the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA), Victorville ranks below the median average at several of these facility types. This means Victorville needs to increase the amount of park, recreation, and play space to meet or exceed the NRPA standards.
To fund parks, recreation, and children's play spaces, two types of funding are needed, one for physical construction and another for operation, maintenance, and programming costs.
Funding for facility construction includes Development Impact Fees (DIF) and any discretionary funding that can be allocated to the City's General Fund or Measure P.
Operations and maintenance are subsidized entirely by the City's General and Measure P funds. Recreation programs charge a user fee for the service being provided; however, the General Fund and Measure P will subsidize up to 52% of the programming costs.
To meet the NRPA standards and fulfill the facility goals identified in the City's 2020 Park and Recreation Master Plan, six projects have been identified with a current estimated project cost of $56.8 million. Currently, a $36.2 million deficiency exists to fulfill the master plan goals. 8 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
OVERVIEW
POPULATION TRENDS
145,000
140,000
135,000
130,000
12S,000
120,000
11S,000
110,000
10S,000
2014 201s 201, 2011 201a 2019 2020 2021 2022 2021 2024
■Populat,on
Victorville is considered a full-service city, only
contracting its police department and trash
services, as it provides local services to its
residents. Among those services, Victorville
provides fire and paramedic services, sewer,
water, and recreation, as well as electric and
natural gas services for commercial customers
at its two business parks. It also owns and
operates a large airport and maintains a
roadway system that spans approximately
479-centerline miles.
Victorville is a growing City with a geographic
jurisdiction of 74 square miles. Over the past
decade, the City's population has grown by
approximately 18%, reaching over 141,000
residents.
9 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
A 5-member, elected City Council leads the City, and it governs following the guidance provided in its adopted Strategic Plan. The current Strategic Plan establishes a Mission, Vision, and Values that include an adopted set of norms which guide how the Council is to conduct itself. It also defines the Council's multi-year goals and the strategies in place to achieve those goals.
Beginning in May and concluding in June of every calendar year, the City Council is presented with a budget proposal that is shaped to meet the adopted Strategic Plan Goals.
The current budget is approximately $388 million and is balanced with revenues of $376 million and reserve funds of approximately $11.37 million. While $388 million may sound like a lot of money, it really isn't when you consider these funds being spread out over 88 different fund accounts. Among these funds, 61% are Enterprise, Special Revenue, Capital Project, or Fiduciary funds which all have specific restrictions on how its money can be spent. The remaining 39% are General Funds, which includes 10% specifically generated from Measure P, the general-purpose sales tax measure approved by Victorville voters in 2020. 10 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
The money generated for the City's General Fund can be spent on practically any lawful expense decided by the City Council and offers the least number of restrictions. Because of this, a city's General Fund is typically looked at to measure the health of a city. Currently, the General Fund is budgeted to generate approximately $109 million in revenue, which is relied on along with reserves and loan proceeds, to pay for budgeted expenditures of $110.5 million.
Sales Tax (27%) and Property Taxes (32%) make up 59% of the total General Fund Revenues.
Among the budgeted expenditures, Public Safety (57.1%) makes up the largest share of General Fund expenditures, including Police (36.3%), Fire (18.7%) and Code and Animal Services (2.1%). Not included in this General Fund summary are the revenues and expenditures from Measure P. Though Measure P is a general tax, the approved measure required an oversight committee to review and track its funds, separate from the General Fund, so that it can determine if the moneys generated are spent for purposes consistent with the intent of the original measure.
Prior to the decision to place Measure P
on the November 2020 ballot, the
Victorville City Council were presented
with, and considered, a Public Safety
Plan, which was a study performed in
response to an earlier request, to
determine how the City could become
more proactive in its public safety and
homelessness response, among other
things.
The Public Safety Plan summarized how General Fund revenues were outpaced by General Fund expenditures, creating a structural deficit without sufficient reserves to withstand it. A 1-cent sales tax ballot measure was the recommended approach to funding a change in the service delivery plan to meet the expectations of residents. 11 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
The current Measure P budget relies on $31.6 million in revenues to fund the budgeted expenditures of $44.l million and includes approximately $8 million in one-time capital expenses. The current budget relies on approximately $12.5 million of reserves to balance the difference. More detail about Measure P can be found on the City's website at Victorvi I leCA.gov/MeasureP.
12 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
As a part of each budget cycle, including mid-year budget reviews, City staff performs a cash flow analysis to determine how much cash is available to sustain a deficit spend. This analysis also measures the cash flow against a City Council adopted reserve target of 17%. The adopted reserve target was established after considering the timing of receipts and expenditures on a fund basis and a determination of a minimum target of money necessary to help the fund operate during a fiscal year without depending on the internal borrowing from other City funds. The tables connected to this paragraph provide a good example of what staff presents to the City Council to help illustrate the health of its general funds. In both illustrations, it should be noted that each forecast is for a period of 5-years and very conservatively forecasts revenue growth while expenditure growth is based on known matters, such as agreed upon labor contracts. Said differently, in both cases, revenue growth is typically forecasted to grow at a much slower rate than expenditure growth.
Each of the above captioned illustrations summarize that the budgeted reserve levels are exceeding the reserve targets of 17%. However, in each of the illustrations, the reserve level declines over the 5-year forecast. In the case of the General Fund, the budgeted reserve level at the close of the 25-26 Fiscal Year is approximately $43.6 million in surplus cash, however, that trends downward to approximately $77.26 million by the close of the 29-30 Fiscal Year.
This means that the General Fund is forecasted to deficit spend over the next five years and its cash available declines from 56% to 26%. While this comparison forecasts the General Fund in good shape over the next 5-years, its trajectory can only be redirected by making cuts to public safety levels. The General Fund forecast also shows that it can't sustain taking on additional major capital improvements as that will cause the General Fund to fall below its reserve target. Similarly, Measure Pfund forecasts a reserve level of approximately $29.63 million in surplus cash, however, that trends downward to approximately $73 million by the 29-30 Fiscal Year. This means that Measure Pis forecasted to deficit spend over the next five years and its cash declines from 92% funded to 52% funded. While this forecast also shows that Measure P is currently in good shape, it can't sustain the added cost for public safety staff and the capital improvements necessary to support an enhancement in public safety service levels described as outcomes later in this report.
Each of the subjects addressed in the Executive Summary found above are discussed in this report with much greater detail. The report concludes with a financial summary that will help better explain the need for support from the community if it wants to see progress in addressing our infrastructural challenges.
13 REPAIR STREETS, FIX POTHOLES,
AND IMPROVE ROADWAY SAFETY
14 Introduction
The City of Victorville maintains approximately 479 centerline miles of public streets including arterial streets, collector streets, and residential streets. These streets support local residents, commuters, freight movement, school transportation, emergency response, and regional travel. Since Victorville sits along Interstate 15, the City's roadway system serves both local and regional traffic.
Over the past three decades, Victorville has experienced significant population growth and regional traffic congestion. Population increases, commuting patterns, and freight movement have all contributed to higher traffic volumes on the City's roadways. As traffic grows, infrastructure such as pavement, traffic signals, sidewalks, and safety improvements must be maintained and expanded to meet community needs and ensure safety. Victorville's population and corresponding road usage have increased at a rate that the City is unable to afford the necessary infrastructure improvements at current funding levels.
Management of public streets involves a comprehensive, systematic process of planning the maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction of the roadway network. Victorville's Pavement Management Program follows this methodology, which includes maintaining an extensive database identifying the condition of each road in the City. To evaluate roadway conditions, Victorville, along with other public agencies, typically use a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) developed by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. This standardized rating system measures pavement condition on a scale of Oto 100. A score of 100 represents a newly constructed road in excellent condition, while lower scores reflect increased age and deterioration. Victorville's last pavement management analysis shows an overall PCI of 65.7, which is classified as "Fair" under industry standards; this score corresponds to a "D" grade in a school-style report card analogy.
However, once pavement condition falls into the "Fair" range, which is where Victorville roads are, deterioration accelerates rapidly. If maintenance is deferred beyond this point, the roadway quickly drops into "Poor" and "Very Poor" condition, requiring much more extensive and costly rehabilitation or reconstruction. In practical terms, this means that maintaining pavements in "Good" or "Satisfactory" condition is far more cost-effective than allowing them to deteriorate and then attempting to restore them later. Delayed maintenance not only increases long-term costs but also results in reduced service quality, increased safety risks, and greater disruption to the traveling public.
15 flt!ifia
For purposes of this report, roadway infrastructure needs are evaluated through three key components: pavement condition, roadway safety improvements, and roadway capacity improvements. Together, these elements determine whether a transportation system can safely and reliably support the daily movement of residents, emergency services, freight, and regional travelers. In Victorville, growing traffic demand, aging infrastructure, and constrained funding sources have created increasing pressure on each of these components.
Without sustained investment, roadway conditions will continue to deteriorate, safety risks will
increase, and congestion will worsen along key corridors.
Existing Funding Sources
This section
provides an overview of Victorville's current funding sources, explains the limitations of existing funding sources, examines trends affecting transportation revenues, and identifies the level of investment necessary to stabilize and improve the City's roadway system
over the coming decades. Victorville currently maintains approximately 479 centerline miles of roadway that must be inspected, repaired, and rehabilitated on a regular basis. Once pavement deteriorates beyond certain condition levels, repair costs can increase by four
to five times compared to earlier preventive maintenance treatments. The current limited funding available for road repairs is expected to result in an increased rate of decline for the overall PCI from 0.82 points per year to 2 points per year in the immediate future because
the funding is insufficient to keep pace with the rate in which the roads will deteriorate.
The City's annual road maintenance budget is approximately $14 million a year. This money comes from two sources: the State (SBl) and the County (Measure I). Roughly one half of these funds go to the Public Works Department's asphalt and concrete crews. These crews are responsible for day-to-day maintenance like pothole repair, crack filling and sealing, as well as the removal and replacement of deficient curbs, gutters, curb ramps, and sidewalks.
That leaves
approximately $7 million annually for capital street projects such as road reconstruction and rehabilitation. Factoring prevailing wage requirements and escalating construction costs, the City can typically afford one or two major reconstruction projects and one slurry seal per year. With the current funding, the City has only been able to reconstruct
2.5% of the 479 centerline miles of roadway in the City and rehabilitate just 10% of the pavement area to extend the useful life of the roads.
16 Figure 1 below shows the asphalt and concrete maintenance efforts completed by City Staff in the past five fiscal years:
Figure 1- Public Works Department Asphalt and Concrete Maintenance Efforts LF of Crack Seal
Total Potholes Filled
SF of AC R&R
SF of Sidewalk R&R
SF of New Sidewalk
LF of Curb R&R
LF of Curb & Gutter R&R
■liJ•Wl■tll@■iifWl■d!tiU■ii&tMIMffitW
223,360 199,580 130,880 100,710 23,900 678,430
7,714 8,389 12,658 17,367 12,041 58,169
52,427 56,956 35,884 79,381 43,030 267,678
20,301 19,175 14,440 14,256 17,498 85,670
5,980 0 0 0 5,052 11,032
399 126 118 195 1,004 1,842
568 25 287 850 160 1,890
Figure 2 below shows the traffic signage and striping maintenance efforts completed by City Staff in the past five fiscal years:
FY 20/21 FY 21/22
Miles of Striping 291 285
No. of Legends Striped 466 1,194
LF of Red Curbs Painted 58,720 13,420
New Signs Installed 238 338
Signs Replaced 1,006 587
FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 I Totals
314 569 740 2,199
757 1,542 1,753 5,712
2,717 19,717 15,297 109,871
309 279 250 1,414
742 654 752 3,741
■
Figure 2 - Public Works Department Traffic Signage, and Striping Maintenance Efforts *Linear Feet (LF), Square Feet (SF), Removal & Reconstruction (R&R), Asphalt Concrete (AC) 17 Road Development Impact Fees (DIF) are collected from new developments that will negatively impact the existing roadway network. New developments increase congestion along major roadways, requiring capacity improvements and improved traffic management to assist the flow of traffic. The use of these funds are limited to capacity improvement projects, they cannot be used for preservation, rehabilitation, and reconstruction projects.
Recent capacity improvement and traffic management projects that utilized the majority of this funding over the past several years include the construction of the Green Tree Boulevard bridge and the widening of the Bear Valley Road bridge over the BNSF Railroad.
Although these funding sources provide important support for roadway projects, they have not kept pace with the growing infrastructure needs of the City. While revenue sources are expected to decline, maintenance and construction costs have increased. Federal transportation grants can provide meaningful funding for specific projects, but they are typically competitive, infrequent, and restricted to eligible uses. As a result, they cannot be relied upon as a consistent or sufficient source of funding to address the City's ongoing roadway maintenance and rehabilitation funding gap.
Needs Analysis
Like all pavement systems, roadway surfaces deteriorate over time due to traffic, environmental exposure, and the natural aging of the asphalt which binds the pavement mixture together. In Victorville's High Desert climate, this deterioration can occur more rapidly because pavement is routinely exposed to extreme temperature fluctuations. The temperature in any given day can change more than 20 degrees, causing pavement materials to repeatedly expand and contract. These cycles, combined with occasional rain, freeze-thaw, and heavy vehicle traffic, accelerate the formation of cracks and surface failures.
Without timely maintenance, small cracks and surface distress can quickly worsen, allowing moisture to penetrate the pavement structure and leading to potholes, structural damage, and ultimately far more costly reconstruction projects.
The City's pavement management program evaluates roadway conditions and prioritizes maintenance and rehabilitation activities across the transportation network. This system provides an objective, data-driven approach for determining where the City's limited roadway funding should be invested to achieve the greatest benefit. As part of this process, streets are categorized as arterials, collectors, and residential streets. Arterial roadways carry the highest traffic volumes and serve as the primary travel corridors across the City. Collector streets connect residential neighborhoods to these major corridors, while residential streets primarily provide local access within neighborhoods. Since the City's available funding is inadequate to keep up with the required efforts discussed above, the City prioritizes its limited funding based on traffic volume. The higher the volume, the higher the priority, which is why most of the available funding is used on the City's arterial roads. 18 Despite continued investment using all available roadway funding sources, the City's overall PCI has gradually declined over the past decade. Data shows the current downward trend in the PCI may accelerate if no additional funding is invested in the roadway network.
Victorville's last pavement management analysis shows an overall PCI of 65.7. While a PCI of
65.7 is classified as "Fair" under industry standards, it reflects roads that are already deteriorating and, without timely maintenance, approaching "Poor" condition. The PCI score range, condition category, and condition description are noted in Figure 3.
PCI Score Condition Category General Description
86-100 Good Little or no distress; routine
maintenance only
71 -85 Satisfactory Minor deterioration;
preventive maintenance
56-70 Fair (Victorville= 65.7) Moderate distress;
rehabilitation planning
41-55 Poor Significant deterioration;
structural repairs required
26-40 Very Poor Major pavement distress;
reconstruction planning
11-25 Serious Extensive damage;
pavement nearing failure
0-10 Failed Pavement is no longer
serviceable; full
Figure 3 -Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Report Card
A PCI below 55 indicates the roadway has reached a condition where maintenance costs
increase significantly. More cost-effective treatments, such as slurry seal and micro-surfacing, are best applied when the PCI ranges from 56 to 79, extending the pavement's service life and delaying the need for more expensive reconstruction. 19 100
85 70
55 40
25 10
0 Standard PCI
rating sea le
Significant Drop
In Condition
Time
Will Cost
$4to $5
Here
Figure 4 - Pavement Condition Degradation Curve
The pavement condition degradation curve (Figure 4) illustrates how roadway conditions decline over time if only minimal or no maintenance is performed. In the early years of a pavement's life, the condition index declines gradually. During this phase, relatively low-cost preventive maintenance (e.g., crack sealing, slurry seals) can preserve the roadway at a high service level and extend its useful life. Figure 5 illustrates the historical PCI trend for Victorville over the past twelve years. While individual rehabilitation projects can temporarily improve conditions on specific streets, the overall trend demonstrates that current funding levels are not sufficient to keep pace with the ongoing deterioration of the City's roadway system. 74 64
62 PAST 12 YR PCI TREND
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 20212022 202 3 2024 202 5 Figure 5- Victorville Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Trend 2013-2025 Recent pavement condition data shows that many of Victorville's roadways are approaching the threshold where preventive maintenance is no longer sufficient and more costly rehabilitation treatments are necessary.
20 Estimated Treatment Method Cost
The current treatment method used to identify what potential road work will be performed is based upon the PCI rank of each road segment, illustrated in Figure 6.
Using the prescribed treatment methods identified in the decision tree, and assuming current local cost data with a 3% inflation, the following results show the potential outcomes based on varying funding projections over a 10-year period:
1. $7 million Annual Budget (Current budget) - Will result in the PCI decreasing by 2 points per year. The backlog of deferred projects will grow by approximately $15 million a year.
2. $16 million Annual Budget-The PCI would decrease by 1 point per year. The backlog of deferred projects will grow by approximately $6 million a year.
3. $20 million Annual Budget-The PCI would stabilize and the backlog of deferred projects will grow approximately $2 million a year.
4. $22 million Annual Budget-The PCI average would increase. The backlog of projects will slowly shrink, and no additional projects will be deferred.
These scenarios demonstrate that, under current funding levels, roadway conditions will continue to decline, and the backlog of needed improvements will grow over time.
Conversely, increased and sustained investment would stabilize and potentially improve the City's overall pavement condition. Establishing a dedicated local revenue source would provide the consistent funding necessary to shift the trajectory from ongoing decline to continued preservation and improvement. The relationship between funding levels, pavement conditions, and backlog reduction is further analyzed in the financial cash flow.
PCI Range Condition
36-100 Good
71-85 Satisfactory
56-70 Fair
41-55 Poor
Very Poor
11-25 Serious
0-10 Failed
Treatment Method
None
Slurry Seal
Micro-surfacing
2-inch AC Overlay
2-inch AC Overlay
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
Extended Life
(years)
5-7
8-10
12-20
12 -20
30 30
Figure 6 -Pavement Network Treatment Method Decision Tree 21 Demand and Service Trends
Several long-term trends are affecting both the demand placed on Victorville's roadway network and the financial resources available to maintain it. One of the most significant changes is the transition toward electric and increasingly fuel-efficient vehicles. Historically, transportation infrastructure in California has been funded largely through gasoline excise taxes that are collected when drivers purchase fuel. As vehicles transition toward electric power and higher fuel efficiency, fewer drivers are buying gasoline, which reduces revenue available for roadway maintenance and rehabilitation. Additionally, electric vehicles are 10 to 30% heavier than comparable gas-powered vehicles, leading to more wear and tear on the roads without contributing to the cost of maintenance. At the same time, the cost of constructing and maintaining roadway infrastructure has increased substantially.
Demand for roadway infrastructure in the High Desert region has also continued to increase.
Interstate 15 serves as a major regional corridor for freight movement, tourism travel, and commuter traffic connecting Southern California to Nevada. Victorville's roadway network functions as an important connection point, while also supporting local economic activity, residential growth, and commercial development. These factors contribute to increasing traffic volumes on the City's arterial streets and place additional stress on pavement infrastructure.
DEFERRED ANNUAL TREATMENT COST TREND
$320,000,000
$300,000,000
$280,000,000
$260,000,000
$240,000,000
$220,000,000
$200,000,000
$180,000,000 .__ __________ _
-ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST OF
'MJRK
-ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST OF
'MJRK WITH INFLA TIOO
-L11ear (ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST
Ci'WORK)
Figure 7-Deferred Annual Treatment Cost Trend
Together, these trends of declining fuel tax revenues, rising construction costs, and increasing traffic demand are creating a widening gap between the infrastructure needs of the community and the funding available to maintain the roadway system. Without additional investment, pavement conditions will continue to decline, while maintenance costs increase, and congestion will continue worsening. 22 Identified Service Caps
Transportation safety is a significant concern for communities throughout California, including Victorville. Cities must address a range of roadway safety challenges including vehicle collisions, pedestrian safety risks, and congestion along major travel corridors. Several corridors within Victorville experience elevated crash risk and congestion during peak travel periods. Corridors that carry high traffic volumes and contain multiple signalized intersections often experience increased crash potential when congestion, turning movements, and signal timing are not optimally coordinated.
Pedestrian safety improvements are also needed in several areas of the City. In some locations, gaps in sidewalks, limited pedestrian crossing infrastructure, and the absence of accessible pedestrian signals can create safety challenges. Research demonstrates that improvements such as Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb ramps, and Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) push button systems significantly improve pedestrian visibility and crossing safety.
Analysis conducted as part of the City's Local Roadway Safety Plan indicates that a significant share of traffic collisions in Victorville occur at non-signalized intersections.
Between 2016 and 2020, the City recorded 3,139 traffic collisions, of which 50% occurred at non-signalized intersections. These locations also pose a disproportionate risk to vulnerable roadway users. The study found that nearly 60% of pedestrian collisions and approximately 74% of bicycle collisions occurred at non-signalized intersections, highlighting the safety challenges associated with the lack of traffic control devices. These findings underscore the importance of targeted safety improvements such as signalization, enhanced pedestrian crossings, traffic calming measures, and other intersection upgrades to reduce collision risk and improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists.
Currently, 3 non-signalized intersections within the City warrant the installation of traffic signals; however, due to insufficient funding, these signals have been neither designed nor constructed. In addition, only 38 of the City's 101 signalized intersections are equipped with APS systems. APS devices provide audible and vibrotactile information that assists visually impaired pedestrians with safely navigating intersections. Expanding the installation of APS systems would improve pedestrian safety and accessibility throughout the City while supporting compliance with the ADA.
23 Key issues identified through field observations and community input included excessive vehicle speeds along corridors such as 7th Street, difficulty crossing wide multi-lane roadways, drivers failing to yield to pedestrians at crosswalks, gaps in sidewalks, and conflicts between turning vehicles and pedestrians at intersections. These conditions increase the risk of accidents and discourage walking and bicycling in the area. An analysis of pedestrian fatality data found that Victorville ranked second among U.S. cities with populations over 100,000 for pedestrian fatalities in 2021, with approximately 9 pedestrian deaths per 100,000 residents. To address these deficiencies, the City has retained Dokken Engineering to prepare a streetscape redesign for Seventh Street. The proposed concept includes traffic calming and pedestrian safety improvements such as enhanced lighting, wider sidewalks, and potentially reducing to one lane in each direction to slow traffic. Although design work is currently underway, funding for construction has not yet been identified. While grant opportunities may offset a portion of the project cost, a significant funding gap is expected to remain; a dedicated revenue source for pedestrian improvements is needed.
Roadway Capacity Constraints
In addition to pavement condition and safety, roadway capacity plays a critical role in maintaining an efficient and reliable transportation system. Several key corridors in Victorville experience congestion due to limited lane capacity, signal coordination challenges, and incomplete roadway buildout. Mojave Drive is an example of an existing bottleneck between Interstate 15 and Condor Road that the City is planning to address through phased improvements over the coming years. The original design of this corridor did not anticipate the current and projected traffic volumes, and accommodating future demand will require expanding the roadway and increasing lane capacity.
Another example is the Green Tree Boulevard corridor. While the corridor now extends east to Apple Valley, segments were not built to their ultimate planned width of two lanes in each direction due to funding limitations at the time of construction. Development along this corridor is expected to occur gradually over the coming decades, leaving a current gap between existing roadway capacity and traffic demand. As a result, there is a current need to improve traffic flow along this corridor through additional travel lanes, intersection improvements, and the construction of dedicated free-flow right-turn lanes where feasible.
Similarly, Bear Valley Road is a critical east-west arterial that experiences significant congestion due to high traffic volumes and closely spaced signalized intersections.
Improvements along this corridor should include enhanced signal coordination, including signals operated by Caltrans at the Interstate 15 interchange locations, to improve traffic progression.
24 Looking forward, long-term capacity improvements must also focus on enhancing regional connectivity. The development of additional east-west connections to Interstate 15 will be essential to improving traffic distribution across the network. One such opportunity includes the extension of Eucalyptus Street across the Oro Grande Wash to Interstate 15, which would provide an additional corridor to relieve congestion on existing roadways and improve system redundancy. Together, these capacity improvements are necessary to address both current congestion challenges and future growth, complementing ongoing investments in pavement preservation and roadway safety.
Expected Outcomes
To maintain and improve Victorville's roadway system, a strategic investment plan would prioritize pavement reconstruction, rehabilitation, and preservation along with safety improvements, and congestion relief projects. There are many potential street improvement projects where an immediate investment resulting in a high benefit to the residents of the City could be made. Investing in roadway infrastructure produces direct benefits for the Victorville community. Improved road conditions reduce vehicle repair costs for residents, improve travel reliability for commuters, and support local economic development.
Safety improvements such as improved pedestrian crossings, accessible sidewalks, and coordinated traffic signals help protect residents and visitors. Businesses benefit from improved accessibility, which can encourage commercial investment and job creation.
Ultimately, investing in transportation infrastructure helps strengthen Victorville's quality of life by ensuring that the City's roadways remain safe, reliable, and capable of supporting continued growth.
25 EXPAND LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
INCREASE TRAFFIC SAFETY
26 Introduction
In May 2020, the Public Safety Plan was submitted to the City Council outlining proposed increases to staffing levels in public safety services including police, fire, code compliance, and animal services in order to expand public safety for the growing Victorville community.
In the area of law enforcement, more deputies were needed to speed response times and enhance crime prevention with proactive neighborhood patrols. A key safety enhancement included reducing the larger 6-Beat Patrol System to a smaller 8-, 9-, and ultimately a 10-Beat Patrol System, enabling deputies to patrol smaller geographic areas for quicker response and more proactive crime prevention.
Victorville's current police station was built in 2001, when there were 57 sworn officers serving a population of 67,854 residents. Since then, the Victorville population has grown to more than 141,000 residents, and the number of police staff has increased to 142, nearly tripling in size. Consequently, the increase in law enforcement personnel has created space issues in the current building, impacting the ability to serve the City's current population efficiently and effectively. The current police station is 15,828 square feet and does not offer the space needed for safety equipment and vehicles. The new police station will encompass more than 44,000 square feet and triple the space for safety equipment and vehicles, significantly enhancing capacity. To further decrease response time, increase law enforcements' effectiveness, and enhance crime prevention, the new police station will incorporate a real time information center incorporating the City's network of automatic license plate readers, ShotSpotter gun detection technology, and first responder drones. A community multipurpose room will be used for community outreach events.
The station will be strategically located on City-owned land at the northwest corner of Seneca Road and Civic Drive. Conceptual and schematic designs have been completed and construction plans are in development.
27 Existing Funding Sources
The General
Fund and Measure P continue to fund the current staffing model. Thanks to Measure P, many of the improvements outlined in the Public Safety Plan were enacted.
However, further progress is stalled due to continued population growth, increasing needs for public safety services, and space constraints of the outdated 25-year-old police station.
The Public Safety Plan called for the addition of 30 deputies. Despite space constraints presented by the current police station, the City added 12 personnel, including 5 Deputy Sheriff's, 5 Sheriff's Service Specialists (SSS), 1 Crime Analyst, and 1 Detective/Corporal, which has had a beneficial impact such as reduced response times, more proactive neighborhood patrolling, and some added traffic enforcement. This has increased staffing by roughly 11% since the introduction of the Public Safety Plan.
160
140
124
120
'°
100 !fl
80 60
..
40 ..
20 0
"'1-
-'o-<s-
POLICE DEPARTMENT STAFFING LEVELS
125 125 128
'° " "
!fl !fl !fl
.. ..
")..l
"'1- ")..l -'o o..,6' .,.., o..,.,.
128
" !fl
"'1-
-'o :?9
.p.p .p .p .p
139 141 142 142 142
127
N
Ill
!fl
"). "'.1-
.,� "'? Q ✓ ••
!fl ., ., ., ., ., ., .,
"). "'.1- "'.1- "'.1-
<'� -'o., -'o.i -'o'3' ?.. "::J.. .,._ •• ■Sworn Non-Sworn *2021-2024 reflect years in which Measure P funding was available With the additional staffing, the City implemented an 8-Beat Patrol System allowing deputies to patrol smaller geographic areas for a more proactive approach to service.
Nonetheless, with additional space offered by a new police station, the City would be able to add the remaining 18 deputies as recommended in the Public Safety Plan, ensuring even greater public safety for the growing Victorville Community. Three additional positions were funded outside of Measure P.
28 Needs Analysis
Call volume has grown alongside steady population increases in Victorville, placing strain on the City's ability to efficiently deliver public safety services to the community 180,000
160,000
140,000
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
00 ....
M
I
CALLS-FOR-SERVICE: PROACTIVE VS.
0 ... 0 .... ... cn 00
.... - cn '° ,.,- ,.; "' ... "' • �-: ...
... '° � M "' 0 M 0 0 .,; �- ,.; N N N
I I I
DISPATCHED
.... 0 0 "'
a, M
- ·:f- ...
0 ....
0 ....
N
I
0 ... .... . .,; en
I I
...
N "'
vi
I
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020" 2021-- 2022•• 2023.. 2024.. 2025 ■ Proactive cans ■ Dispatched Calls Total
*Data is not available for 2020-2022 due
to the network disruption that affected
the San Bernardino County Sheriff's
Department on April 7, 2023.
**2021-2024 reflect years in which
Measure P funding was available.
Over the past decade, the City's population has grown by approximately 18%, reaching over 141,000 residents. While service levels are demonstrating a promising upward trend, further advancements could be achieved by increasing staffing through Measure P. Nonetheless, these improvements are contingent upon the construction of a new facility that will accommodate additional personnel. An estimated $72 million is needed to construct the new police station. While $20 million has been allocated from Measure P for the new station, a funding gap of $52 million remains. Furthermore, the City aims to establish a 9- and, ultimately, a 10-Beat Patrol System which will also be achievable by providing the necessary space for the recommended additional personnel.
The 8-Beat Patrol System that was implemented in 2024 has alleviated many issues, giving officers smaller geographical areas to cover and thus decreasing response times considerably. This has also realigned staff to better cover the Traffic Division, increasing the number of traffic citations issued since 2019 by over 220%. Along with the increased number of citations, the increased enforcement and proactive patrols have also influenced driving behavior, causing the number of traffic collisions, including those with fatalities, to trend downward.
29 8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
40 35
30 25
0 -
2015
TRAFFIC CITATIONS ISSUED
_I
2016 2017
p
p
-•-
2018 2019 2020 2021 .. 2022 .. 2023 .. 2024 .. 2025 ..
FATAL TRAFFIC COLLISIONS
.p .p
.p .p
_I_
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 •• 2022•• 2023•• 2024°0 2025•• .,.2021-2025 reflects years in which
Measure P funding was available.
'"2021-2025 reflects years in
Measure P funding was available
which
In addition to the enhanced traffic enforcement, concentrated enforcement operations have heightened police visibility, thereby creating a more noticeable presence. 30 The priority level of a call is determined by the information made available at the time of the call; as additional information is provided the priority level may change. Below is a brief description of priority levels that may be assigned to a call. • Priority 2 - Incidents in which the suspect is out of the area, but a delay in response would cause a loss of evidence. This type of call could also be a burglary where the suspect has fled the scene, but evidence of the suspect is available and needs to be gathered quickly.
• Priority 3 - Incidents in which the suspect is out of the area and delay would not cause a loss of evidence. This type of call could include crimes such as vandalism of property. • Priority 4- Incidents in which the suspect is out of the area and the existence of evidence is unlikely. This type of call includes stale crimes, such as someone leaving for vacation and coming home to find vandalism or burglary.
As a result of the increased staffing and delineation of tasks, response times for priority calls have decreased since the Public Service Plan was introduced. The following two charts summarize the time it takes for a Priority 2-4 call to be assigned to a Deputy upon being received by dispatch, and the time it takes for the Deputy to report to the scene. 31 1
RESPONSE TIME - RECEIVED TO DISPATCH
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021" 2022" 2023"' 2024" 2025 cPriomv2 ■Priontv3 ■Pnomv4
*Data is not available for 2022 due to the network
disruption that affected the San Bernardino County
Sheriffs Department on April 7, 2023.
**2021-2024 reflect years in which Measure P
funding was available.
-*Figures for 2023 only include the months of
August through December due to the network
disruption.
Aside from the staffing
enhancements funded through
Measure P, the City has utilized
other funding sources to secure
the property for the future police
station and implement new
technologies that better serve the
community. In 2024, the City
secured $3.7 million in
discretionary funding from San
Bernardino County to acquire 9.18
acres for the new Victorville police
station.
$45,000,000
S40,000,000
$3S,000,000
$30,000,000
$2S,000,000
$20,000,000
SIS,000,000
$10,000,000
SS,000,000
$0
201s 2016 2011 201s 2019 2020 202100 2022· 202300 202400 202s•· 0Prio,,ty2 ■Prior,tyl ■Pno,,ty4
*Data is not available for 2020-2022 due
to the network disruption that affected
the San Bernardino County Sheriffs
Department on April 7, 2023.
**2021-2024 reflect years in which
Measure P funding was available.
POLICE EXPENDITURES
$3,246,287.71
SS,098,408
$2,432,658
$2,10S,604
■ Genenl Fund ME-asure P
Additionally, to stretch Measure P dollars as far as possible, the City has secured grant funding that has enabled the City to implement public safety technologies such as Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) cameras, ShotSpotter, and a drones as a first responder program that increase the Police Department's effectiveness. These technologies have supported the Police Department's proactive approach without imposing additional costs to Measure P, thus sustaining these funds for increased staffing when additional space is available.
32 Expected Outcomes
The City of Victorville requires the construction of a new police station due to significant physical limitations at the current facility. These constraints hinder the addition of personnel as recommended in the Public Safety Plan. Law Enforcement plays an important role in the community by providing public safety services. Constructing a new police station will improve public safety services by allowing an increase in staffing, thereby enhancing response times, expanding traffic enforcement, and implementing a 10-Beat Patrol System.
The new police station will provide nearly three times the amount of space compared to the current building and will offer sufficient space for evidence, safety vehicles, lockers, restrooms, office space, a fitness area, and a new community room, providing residents with greater access to their local law enforcement partners. The new multipurpose community room is a space that can be utilized to host public outreach and education events, supporting the "community first" culture in Victorville. Finally, the Real Time Information Center will be a crucial hub for the police station. It will link all of the City's technologies and provide staff with tools to support a more proactive approach, ultimately helping to create a safer community.
While Measure P resulted in the initial improvement of traffic related calls, reduction in response times, and a more effective Beat Patrol System, these funds are not sufficient to complete the construction of a new $72 million police station. Therefore, it is vital for the City to pursue other funding options to further expand public safety services to serve the growing needs of the Victorville community.
33 EXPAND FIRE AND PARAMEDIC
SERVICES TO IMPROVE EMERGENCY
RESPONSE TIMES
34 Introduction
The City of Victorville continues to experience steady growth in both population and emergency service demand, with annual calls for service exceeding 25,000. Emergency medical incidents represent 85% of responses, ref lecting the Fire Department's expanding role
in providing pre-hospital care. While response performance remains strong, increasing demand is placing added strain on existing resources.
The Victorville Public Safety Plan identifies key challenges, including rising call volumes and the need to improve response times and reliability. A Standard of Cover analysis was conducted to evaluate fire and emergency medical needs, response times, and fire station geographic service areas or Fire Management Zones (FMZ). This analysis confirms that service coverage gaps persist, particularly along the Nisqualli Road/Interstate 15 corridor and the Palmdale Road/Highway 395 corridor. These areas do not have dedicated coverage and therefore
must rely on units from fire stations outside the recommended travel distance to respond. This results in longer response times, reduces the coverage in the responding unit's designated FMZ, and puts a strain on unit availability to respond to simultaneous incidents.
To address these deficiencies, the development of additional fire stations is needed in these low-coverage areas. Reducing travel distance to these high-demand areas will reduce response times to fire and emergency medical incidents when every second counts. New fire stations located in both the Nisqualli Road/Interstate 15 corridor and the Palmdale Road/Highway
395 corridor along with the expansion of Fire Station 313 will address the service coverage gap, reduce response times, and improve operational efficiency for the benefit of
the growing Victorville community.
Existing Funding Sources
Investments funded through Measure P and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) have strengthened staffing, apparatus, and facility conditions; however, there are not enough resources to also expand infrastructure to meet long-term demand. Financial analysis indicates that
Measure P revenues are largely committed to existing operations and are insufficient to support the development of additional fire stations for expanded fire and emergency medical service. Additional funding is needed to expand fire and emergency medical service
and improve fire department operations. Measure P has provided a stable fu
nding source for maintaining current fire and emergency medical services, including existing fire operations, personnel, equipment, apparatus, and facility maintenance. 35 Needs Analysis
This analysis builds upon the Standard of Cover assessment by focusing on how identified deficiencies can be addressed. Specifically, it evaluates the capital investment required to expand infrastructure and support the operational costs necessary to improve response times. The City's current funding structure does not provide sufficient capacity to support major capital expansion
without impacting ongoing service levels.
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
S,000
0 Olher CIiis • ..
FIRE DEPARTMENT: CALLS FOR SERVICE
2015• 2016• 2011• 201s• 2019" 2020 2021 .. 2022•• 2023 .. 2024 .. 2025 ..
2.1)61 2,002 1,870 2.033 2,291 3,334 3,682 1,912 1,887 1,809 2,002 ■ Fire ca1s 71S 772 867 881 967 1,608 1,97S 1,993 2,012 1,994 1,890 ■Medical '41s 18,000 18,593 20,109 19,369 19,71S 21,314 22,733 21,368 21,010 21,.777 21,.468 TOTAL 20,776 21,367 22,846 22,283 22,973 26,256 28,390 25,273 24,909 2S,S80 2S,360 *SBCFPD provided contracted
services to the City from July
2008 through March 2019.
**2021-2025 reflect years in which
Measure P funding was available.
***Other calls include public
service calls, assisting law
enforcement, water leaks, smoke
alarm or fire sprinkler activations,
carbon monoxide alarms, down
power lines, etc.
Over the past several years, the Victorville Fire Department has experienced a consistent increase in demand for emergency services. From 2019 to 2025, total calls increased by approximately 10%, rising from 22,973 calls in 2019 to 25,360 calls in 2025. This sustained growth reflects both population increases and expanding service demands within the City.
Emergency medical calls continue to represent the largest share of the department's workload, accounting for an average of 85% of total responses each year. In 2025, the department responded to 21,468 medical incidents, compared to 1,890 fire calls, and 2,002 miscellaneous service calls. Miscellaneous service calls include public service calls, assisting law enforcement, water leaks, smoke alarm or fire sprinkler activations, carbon monoxide alarms, and downed power lines. This data illustrates the ongoing demand for emergency medical services and the evolving role of the fire department as a primary provider of pre hospital medical care within the community.
The growth in call volume has occurred alongside steady population increases in Victorville.
Over the past decade, the City's population has grown to over 141,000 residents. As the population increases, demand for emergency services rises accordingly, placing added pressure on existing fire stations, personnel, and apparatus. Improving response performance under these conditions requires continued investment in infrastructure and the strategic deployment of resources.
36 In addition to total call volume, several statistical indicators help describe fire service outcomes and operational workload. These include:
• Calls for-service per capita: which reflects the relationship between population growth and emergency demand.
• Simultaneous incident frequency: where multiple emergency calls occur at the same time, requiring additional apparatus or longer travel distances for responding units. • Distribution of call types: particularly the high percentage of emergency medical calls relative to fire suppression incidents.
Collectively, these indicators demonstrate the increasingly demanding environment. With more than 25,000 calls annually, the Victorville Fire Department is the second busiest in San Bernardino County, reflecting the significant level of service demand within the community.
While Measure P investments have strengthened staffing, equipment, and operational capacity, continued growth in call volume underscores the need for infrastructure expansion to ensure response capabilities keep pace with the City's expanding public safety needs.
Public Safety Overview
The
Victorville Public Safety Plan establishes clear priorities for the Victorville Fire Department centered on maintaining effective emergency response capabilities, improving service coverage, and ensuring that fire and emergency medical services keep pace with increasing demand. The Public Safety Plan identifies fire services as a critical component of public
safety, focused on the protection of life and property through timely and reliable emergency response. A primary goal identified within the Public Safety Plan is to address the significant growth in call volume and service demand. The Fire Department's expanding role in providing emergency medical services emphasizes the importance of maintaining adequate
deployment strategies to support both fire suppression and medical response.
The Public Safety Plan further emphasizes the need to improve service coverage and reduce operational strain on existing resources. Current deployment conditions require units to frequently respond outside of their designated service areas due to coverage gaps within the City. This results in increased response times, reduced unit availability within primary response zones, and diminished ability to respond to simultaneous incidents. Currently, average
response times for medical and fire calls are 6.32 minutes and 7.76 minutes, respectively.
In addition,
the Public Safety Plan references nationally recognized performance standards, including those
established by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA 1710), which recommends an initial response travel time of approximately four minutes for emergency incidents. Achieving response times that align more closely with these standards is a core performance goal for the Fire Department and is directly influenced by station location and resource distribution. These priorities reflect a broader objective of strengthening overall performance and maintaining a high level of service for the community as growth continues. 37 Standard of Cover
A Standard of Cover analysis evaluates how effectively fire department resources are positioned to respond to emergency incidents across the community. This assessment considers station locations, travel distances, staffing levels, and the geographic distribution of incidents to determine whether resources are appropriately located to meet established response time objectives and maintain reliable service levels. In addition to response times, this analysis also evaluates the department's ability to maintain adequate coverage when multiple incidents occur simultaneously.
The City's geographic size and continued growth in high service demand areas continue to present challenges for maintaining optimal response coverage. As development expands outward, the distance between existing stations and emerging service areas increases, placing added demand on current resources, creating increased response times, and reduced coverage in other areas of the City. Travel distance accounts for approximately 65 to 75% of the total response time to an incident. Two areas present a clear need for improved response coverage: the Nisqualli Road/ Interstate 15 corridor and the Palmdale Road/Highway 395 corridor. These corridors serve as major transportation routes and are experiencing continued residential and commercial development, contributing to a growing demand for emergency services. Due to their distance from existing station locations, incidents in these areas frequently require units from several miles away to respond, causing increased response times. The construction of a new fire station in each of these areas, referred to as Station 316 and Station 317, will improve response times and allow resources to be more available for incidents that occur throughout the City.
The current FMZ configuration no longer aligns with actual service demand. A focused evaluation of service demand demonstrates a high and sustained call volume in these areas, placing consistent strain on surrounding FMZs and necessitating the establishment of FMZ 316 with the addition of Station 316 at the Nisqualli Road/Interstate 15 corridor, and FMZ 317 with the planned Station 317 at the Palmdale Road/Highway 395 corridor. A detailed review of 2024 and 2025 call data shows that the majority of incidents in proposed FMZ 316 are being handled by FMZ 311 (4,669 calls), followed by FMZ 313 (2,615 calls), FMZ 312 (1,839 calls), FMZ 314 (1,612 calls), FMZ 315 (1,113 calls), and 1,042 responses from mutual aid partners. Similarly, the call data in proposed FMZ 317 indicates that the majority of incidents in this response area are being handled by FMZ 315 (2,964 calls), followed by FMZ 313 (2,416 calls), FMZ 312 (918 calls), FMZ 311 (173 calls), FMZ 314 (10 calls), and 162 responses from mutual aid partners. 38 This imbalance highlights the misalignment between geographic boundaries and resource distribution. The establishment of FMZs 316 and 317 and the addition of Stations 316 and 317 will realign response boundaries with actual demand, improve service reliability, and significantly reduce response times to incidents in these areas. This strategic investment will also decrease dependency on adjacent FMZs and mutual aid resources, ensuring a more balanced, data-driven deployment model that better serves the community's current and future needs.
In addition to the
development of two new fire
stations, the City is also
evaluating strategic
improvements to Station 313,
which is centrally located
between these two corridors.
The location of Station 313
provides a strategic
opportunity to improve
service delivery by
strengthening coverage from
a midpoint location and
enhancing the department's
ability to respond more
efficiently to incidents across
both areas.
FIRE STATION MANAGEMENT ZONES
-
)t!�Zor..
lUfll\l�
JU-Z.,,.
JU�Zo,,.
n,�,..
llS-Z.,,.
11, __
)Jj--
1 .....
39 The proposed improvements for Station 313 include a 3,000 square foot expansion of the existing apparatus bay, providing the necessary space to accommodate additional apparatus.
These improvements are necessary to facilitate the planned relocation of the Medic Squad from Station 315 to Station 313. The current configuration of Station 313 does not provide suff icient space to accommodate this additional apparatus. Relocating the Medic Squad to Station 313 will enhance the department's ability to respond to fire and emergency medical incidents in both the Nisqualli Road/Interstate 15 corridor and the Palmdale Road/Highway 395 corridor. This approach supports a more efficient distribution of resources across the City and helps maintain consistent service levels as demand continues to increase.
Ooe P IW&
W.... A"
�NCAmt2
au•
McuUrl
VlfWAcr•
Expanding Station 313 represents a cost-effective and strategic investment that maximizes the use of existing infrastructure while addressing both current and future service demands.
It provides an immediate opportunity to improve response times and operational readiness while the City continues to evaluate and plan for the development of additional fire stations in high-growth areas.
40 VICTORVILLE FIRE DEPT I
STATION •I I
16200
Estimated Fire Station Construction Cost
Based on the City's proposed fire station design, current cost estimates are approximately $14 million for a three-bay station and $15 million for a four-bay station. These estimates reflect current construction market conditions and provide a more accurate representation of anticipated project costs for facilities designed to meet the City's operational needs. The anticipated construction timeline for each station is approximately 12 to 15 months, and the estimated costs include land acquisition for each site. The City has obtained conceptual plans from Cal Fire for a standardized fire station prototype that can be adapted to meet local operational requirements. The proposed prototype includes all essential components required for modern fire service operations, including apparatus bays, firef ighter living quarters, training and support space, and specialized safety features necessary to support both fire suppression and emergency medical response.
The City is also evaluating improvements to Station 313 as a cost-effective strategy to enhance service. The proposed improvements to Station 313 are estimated at approximately $9.9 million and include expansion of the apparatus bay and the relocation of the Medic Squad from Station 315. Unlike new construction, this investment leverages an existing, strategically located facility to improve service delivery in the near term while the proposed new stations are under construction.
In total, these infrastructure improvements are estimated to cost approximately $39 million.
Overall, this analysis demonstrates that strategic infrastructure investment, supported by a sustainable funding source, is necessary to speed response times, strengthen resource reliability, and expand the Fire Department's service to meet the City's growing public safety needs.
41 Expected Outcomes
The addition of a new fire station at the Nisqualli Road/Interstate 15 corridor and at the Palmdale Road/Highway 395 corridor, along with enhancements to Station 313, will significantly improve emergency medical and fire response performance across the City of Victorville. These improvements include reduced travel distances and reduced response times with responding units more strategically located near high-demand areas. Under the existing conditions, units frequently respond across extended distances to cover areas that lack nearby station infrastructure.
This pattern demonstrates that these areas have a high need for service but are currently dependent on units that must travel an estimated 4 to 6 miles to reach incidents. The proposed stations directly address these service gaps by placing resources within close proximity, approximately l to 2 miles, to existing high-demand areas. This reduction in travel distance equates to a time savings of approximately 3 to 5 minutes; and due to travel time representing the largest portion of total response time, translate into meaningful response time reduction.
42 IMPROVE STORMWATER DRAINAGE
AND ENSURE A SAFE, CLEAN
DRINKING WATER SUPPLY
T
43 �.,.. � .. 7
- J ;
-, �-
.....
Stormwater Drainage
Introduction
Stormwater drainage infrastructure plays a critical role in protecting homes, businesses, and public infrastructure fr om flooding and storm damage. Victorville's location in the Mojave Desert creates unique drainage challenges. Rainfall events are often infrequent but can be intense, producing large volumes of runoff that move quickly through washes and drainage channels. Victorville's
stormwater drainage system includes storm drains, culverts, wash crossings, channels, and detention facilities that move stormwater through the City, into regional drainage systems, and ultimately the Mojave River. Maintenance of the system includes debris removal, sediment clearing, inspection of culverts and pipelines, and repair of damaged infrastructure. These activities are essential to ensure that drainage in frastructure functions properly during storm events. When properly designed and maintained, stormwater infrastructure safely diverts runoff through the City and prevents localized flooding. However, as development expands and in
frastructure ages, additional investment is
required to
maintain and expand the drainage system and protect water quality.
Existing Funding Sources
Funding for stormwater improvements comes from two sources: Drainage Development Impact Fees, and limited operational funding for system maintenance. Development Impact Fees help finance drainage improvements required to support new development, but these funds are restricted to improvements associated with growth and cannot fully address existing system defici encies.
Needs Analysis
Demands and Service Trends
As Victorville continues to develop, impenetrable surfaces, such as pavement, increase the amount of stormwater runoff generated during storms, and creates higher flows within the drainage system, placing additional stress on existing infrastructure. Climate variability may also increase the intensity of storm events, creating greater flood risk in areas where drainage infrastructure is undersized or incomplete. Over time, sediment accumulation and erosion can further reduce the capacity of storm drains and channels. For example, in August 2023, Tropical Storm Hilary caused catastrophic damage to Eucalyptus Street and Doris Davies Park. The City immediately completed the emergency repairs and had to design and budget for the infrastructure restoration which was completed in Summer of 2025. These trends require ongoing investment in both maintenance and capital improvements to ensure that the drainage system continues to function effectively.
44 Identified Service Ciaps
Several locations
within Victorville have been identified as priority drainage improvement areas. These
locations experience recurring flooding, roadway washouts, or erosion damage during storm events. Investing in permanent drainage infrastructure helps prevent repeated damage to
roadways and properties, and reduces costly emergency repairs as well as long term maintenance costs.
In addition to physical infrastructure deficiencies, certain drainage features present ongoing operational and public safety challenges, and require active management by City personnel.
During
significant rainfall events, flooded areas often require the deployment of staff to install temporary signage, barricades, and detour notifications to warn motorists and pedestrians of hazardous conditions. This reliance on manual intervention places a recurring demand on limited City resources and may divert personnel fr om other critical emergency response
functions. More importantly, these types of flooding events pose a life-safety risk.
Despite
the presence of warning signs and temporary traffic control measures, individuals may ignore
posted closures or attempt to cross flowing water, creating dangerous conditions where vehicles or pedestrians can be swept away. These incidents can result in serious injury or loss of life. Addressing these deficiencies through improved storm drain systems and other permanent infrastructure solutions would reduce reliance on emergency response measures and improve public safety.
Expected
Outcomes
A strategic stormwater investment program is recommended to address both existing deficiencies and future growth. Drainage improvements also support environmental goals by improving water quality and reducing erosion. By investing in drainage infrastructure, Victorville can strengthen community resilience and protect the long-term safety and prosperity of the community.
45 Water Quality and Water Suppl y
Introduction
The Victorville Water District (District) relies primarily on groundwater from the Mojave River Basin, an adjudicated groundwater basin, to meet current water demands. The Mojave Basin Area Judgment was established to address historical overdraft conditions and provide a long term framework for sustainable groundwater management. As the service population grows and regulatory limits restrict groundwater production through the Free Production Allowance (FPA), the District faces increasing constraints in meeting demand with existing supplies.
This analysis evaluates the expansion of reclaimed water as a practical solution for irrigation and industrial purposes to offset potable groundwater use. Recycled water produced from the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant (IWWTP) and the Victor Valley Wastewater
Reclamation Authority (VVWRA) provides a consistent, locally available supply that can reduce reliance on groundwater. The proposed approach focuses on the phased development of a recycled water backbone system and and considering a potential funding mechanism to address infrastructure gaps. The initial phase of the recycled water backbone system includes extending a recycled water transmission pipeline from the Southern California Logistics Airport (SCLA) to key users such as Cemex, with future expansion toward Green Tree Golf Course and other high-demand irrigation areas, including parks, schools, and landscaped corridors. This phased strategy allows for targeted investment while maintaining flexibility for long-term system expansion.
Implementation will require capital investment in transmission pipelines, pumping facilities, and related infrastructure. Over time, the system can reduce ongoing costs associated with groundwater replacement. Potential funding sources include grants, bonds, regional partnerships, and user-based revenues from customers receiving recycled water service.
Expanding reclaimed water use through a phased infrastructure approach will improve water supply reliability, reduce dependence on groundwater, and support continued growth within the District.
46 The objective of this analysis is to demonstrate how a reclaimed water system can be used to decrease the District's reliance on groundwater for irrigation and industrial purposes, therefore lowering replacement water costs and protecting long-term drinking water supplies. This analysis builds upon the findings of the Citywide Recycled Water Conceptual Study (CRWCS), completed by Water Systems Consulting, Inc. in September 2025. This study identified a broad range of potential opportunities for the beneficial use of reclaimed water produced at the IWWTP and the WWRA, a regional Joint Powers Authority (JPA), evaluated each at a conceptual level, and recommended a path forward to assist the City in narrowing and advancing the concepts most closely aligned with its goals.
The analysis also evaluates the expected outcomes of expanding recycled water use, including reducing potable groundwater demand, lowering replacement water costs associated with exceeding the District's FPA, improving long-term water supply reliability, and supporting compliance with State water conservation requirements. In addition, it assesses the infrastructure needed to support this expansion. Finally, this analysis identifies potential funding mechanisms to support the expansion of the recycled water system, including user-based revenues from recycled water customers, grant funding opportunities, bonds, and potential regional partnerships.
Mojave Groundwater Basin
Groundwater within the basin is replenished primarily through the intermittent flows of the Mojave River, which typically occur during storm events, as well as minimal direct recharge from precipitation. With average annual rainfall of approximately four inches, natural recharge is constrained, making the basin particularly sensitive to prolonged drought conditions and increased groundwater extraction.
Historically, the Mojave River Basin has experienced overdraft conditions, where groundwater pumping exceeded natural recharge. This led to the adjudication of the basin, which established a legal framework to regulate groundwater production and ensure long-term sustainability. Today, basin management focuses on balancing groundwater extraction with recharge through a combination of natural processes, imported water deliveries, and recharge programs administered by the Mojave Water Agency. 47 Mojave Basin Adjudication
The Mojave Basin Judgment allocates groundwater production rights to individual producers based on historical
pumping, de fining each agency's Base Annual Production (BAP). Under the Judgment, groundwater production is regulated through a court-ordered ramp down process designed to gradually reduce allowable groundwater production and align basin pumping with the available sustainable yield.
Each year,
a producer's BAP may be adjusted to establish its FPA, which represents the volume of groundwater that may be pumped without incurring additional replacement obligations. As
ramp down provisions have taken effect and demand has continued to increase, the District's available FPA has declined, resulting in a growing gap between allowable production and actual water demand.
When groundwater production exceeds the FPA, the excess is recorded as a replacement obligation and must be offset to maintain basin balance. This is typically accomplished through payments
to the Mojave Water Agency (MWA), which acts as the Watermaster and acquires
imported State Water Project supplies for recharge into the basin. In addition to replacement obligations, producers may also incur make-up obligations related to other subarea imbalances, which often require additional water transfers at a higher ratio. -
wsc -· N - :::_ .. _____
A .... :.:..i • ·---
...
L-,1
YcW.a.---�
_, �'-"� □a.-••
AdJuo,cattd 5'bartas
------
.,....�-� .......
-
48 Victorville Water District Pumping and Water Rights
The District service area encompasses approximately 85 square miles, serving the entire City of Victorville and surrounding areas within its sphere of influence. The District's water system includes approximately 776 miles of pipeline, 34 active groundwater wells, 26 storage reservoirs, 74 domestic water tanks, l reclaimed water tank, 8 booster pump stations, and 35 pressure-reducing valve stations. These facilities operate across eight pressure zones, serving elevations ranging
from approximately 2,650 to 3,660 fe et and supporting consistent and reliable water delivery throughout the service area. Over time, groundwater pumping within the District
has increased to meet growing residential, commercial, and industrial demand.
However, due to the basin's limited natural recharge and the Court-ordered ramp down requirements, the
amount of groundwater available under FPA has steadily decreased, constraining the District's ability to rely solely on groundwater supplies. As a result, the District
has consistently exceeded its FPA in recent years, triggering replacement water obligations that are calculated annually based on verified production.
Overall, the District's historical reliance on groundwater, combined with increasing demand and regulatory
constraints, has resulted in ongoing replacement and make-up obligations that carry
both operational and financial implications. These trends reinforce the need for diversified water supply strategies and expanded use of alternative sources, including the purchase of
replacement water, leasing of available carryover water, and the acquisition of additional water rights, to ensure long-term reliability and cost stability within the District's water portfolio.
Ramp-Down Requirements
Most recently, the Court reduced allowable production from 54.4% of BAP in Water Year 2022-23 to 50.4% beginning in Water Year 2023-24, where it remains today. As a result, the District can now produce only 50.4% of its adjudicated groundwater rights without penalty, representing a total
reduction of 49.6% from its original BAP. This ramp down requirement has
fundamentally constrained the District's groundwater supply. This creates a structural deficit that
must be addressed annually. Because the ramp down is a permanent requirement under the Judgment, this imbalance is not temporary and will continue to place operational and financial pressure on the District as demand increases. 49 Reclaimed Water/Sources of Reclaimed Water
Reclaimed water represents a valuable and increasingly important resource within the District's overall water supply portfolio. Reclaimed water is wastewater that has undergone advanced
treatment processes to remove contaminants and achieve a high level of water quality suitable for reuse in non-potable applications. While it is not intended for drinking purposes, it
meets stringent regulatory standards that allow it to be safely used for irrigation and industrial processes rather than being discharged. According to the CRWCS, some of the common uses of reclaimed water include irrigation, dust control, solar panel washing, and cooling water used for power plants. By capturing and reusing treated wastewater, the District is able to maximize the utility of an existing resource rather than relying solely on limited groundwater supplies.
The
District currently has access to reclaimed water from two primary sources: the IWWTP located near the SCLA, and the WWRA facility. Because wastewater flows generally increase as population
grows, reclaimed water supplies tend to increase over time as well. This makes reclaimed water
a reliable and sustainable long-term supply for non-potable uses.
SCLA Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant {IWWTP)
The City operates an Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant near the Southern California Logistics Airport
that treats wastewater generated by industrial activities within the airport, as
well as domestic flows from residential and commercial customers, and produces high quality tertiary recycled water suitable for irrigation and other non-potable uses. The facility utilizes advanced treatment processes, including membrane bioreactor treatment and ultraviolet disinfection,
to meet stringent recycled water standards. The IWWTP currently has a treatment capacity of 2.5 million gallons per day (MGD), and the City is actively working to expand
this capacity to approximately 6.0 MGD within the next five to seven years. Long term projections indicate that flows are expected to increase from current levels, reaching up to 4.2 MGD by 2040, depending on population growth and water conservation trends.
Despite planned system improvements and anticipated increases in demand, projections indicate that
reclaimed water supply from the IWWTP will continue to exceed current and near-term utilization. This surplus condition underscores the importance of expanding distribution in
frastructure beyond the airport to capture additional users and fully leverage available recycled water resources as part of a broader, citywide reuse strategy. so
Victor Valley Wastewater Reclamation Authority {WWRA)
WWRA operates a regional wastewater treatment facility that serves multiple agencies throughout the
Victor Valley, including the City of Victorville. The facility has a treatment capacity of approximately 14 MGD and plays a critical role in managing and treating wastewater generated
across the region. This represents a valuable and underutilized resource that could be directed toward irrigation, industrial processes, and other non-potable applications within the City. Expanding the use of reclaimed water would directly offset groundwater
demand.
Currently, a relatively small number of IWWTP reclaimed water customers utilize approximately 47 % of the facility's annual effluent production. An additional 32% is discharged to Pond 14, which is permitted as an evaporation and infiltration basin intended to provide temporary relief during periods when treatment or discharge compliance constraints
occur. However, Pond 14 is not designed to accommodate the full IWWTP discharge and is constrained by variable infiltration rates. The remaining effluent is considered "excess
recycled water" and is conveyed to a WWRA sewer trunk line to the WWRA headworks, where it undergoes additional treatment prior to discharge to the Mojave River. This results in redundant treatment of water that has already achieved tertiary standards and creates an avoidable annual cost of approximately $7.3 million. To address this inefficiency and reduce both discharge volumes and associated costs, the City has initiated efforts to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit that would allow for direct discharge of excess recycled water to the Mojave River. A consultant has been selected to support this effort, with a targeted completion date in the second quarter of 2027.
Projection of Reclaimed Water Availability
Current recycled water production f r om the IWWTP and WWRA combined is approximately
3.5 MGD.
This supply is projected to increase as wastewater flows increase with population growth and facility expansion. The current forecast estimates are as follows:
4.3 million gallons per day by 2030
6.4 million gallons per day by 2040
These projections suggest that the City will have a significant surplus of recycled water available in future years, creating an opportunity to expand recycled water use and reduce reliance on potable groundwater supplies.
51 Needs Analysis
Alternative Water Supplies
The District continues to experience steady population growth and economic development, both of
which are expected to drive long-term increases in potable water demand. Based on the City's 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), total demand is projected to increase by approximately 38% by 2045. While these projections already incorporate a level of fut
ure conservation, they do not fully reflect more recent State regulations. In 2024, the State adopted Urban Water Use Objectives (UWUO) as part of the Making Conservation a California Way of Life (CWOL) legislation, which will require the City to reduce water use by approximately 20% relative to current levels. The City plans to update both its Water Master Plan and UWMP in 2026 to incorporate these requirements and refine future demand projections.
Even with
these anticipated conservation measures, overall demand is expected to remain elevated due to continued growth, placing additional pressure on existing water supplies. At the same time, groundwater resources remain finite and are increasingly constrained by the requirements of the Mojave Basin Judgment. Relying exclusively on groundwater as a water source is no longer a sustainable long-term strategy, particularly as a significant portion of the
District's adjudicated production rights cannot be exercised without generating ongoing replacement water costs.
Across the water industry,
agencies are increasingly
pursuing diversified supply
portfolios to improve
reliability and reduce
dependence on a single
source. In an inland desert
community such as the City
of Victorville, recycled water
expansion and groundwater
recharge represent the most
practical and cost-effective
strategies, maximizing local
resources and reducing
imported water needs.
35,000
30,000
it 25.000
< a; 20.000
<h
=>
cii 15,000
1v
� 10,000
5.000
27.990 29 .
090
30�
50 3r 25.620 -
22.730 -
I
2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Year
saies to Ottler Agencies
■water Loss
■ Lan<!Scape
■ Commemal/Jnstrtullonat
■ MijtJ..famtly ReSldenltal
■ Stngle-Famly Resldenbal
• Potable Demand
52 Funding the Distribution System Expansion
Developing a recycled water distribution system will require capital investment in pipelines, pumping facilities, tanks, and supporting infrastructure. The future phases of the recycled water project may be funded through a combination of sources. In addition to funding resources, recycled water systems can generate revenue through user charges paid by customers receiving recycled water service; the system could generate between $200,000 and $800,000 in annual revenue during the early phases of implementation. As recycled water use expands, these service charges can help offset operational costs and support the long-term financial sustainability of the recycled water system.
Estimated Recycled Water Expansion Projects Cost
The conceptual recycled water expansion plan for the City of Victorville focuses on two primary infrastructure components: (1) construction of a backbone 24-inch transmission pipeline to deliver recycled water from the SCLA system to the Cemex facility, and (2) construction of two 12-inch extensions from that backbone system to serve existing high demand irrigation users within the City, including parks, schools, and other large, landscaped areas. Together, these projects represent the initial phase of a broader citywide recycled water system that is designed to be scalable and allow future users to connect as development occurs.
Figure 3·10. City Irrigation Conversion, Hydraulic Schematic of Future System Extended from SCLA 16 City IW �-en
(wrT..-.t Pl 3� o.nd 3110,
eo.._ 2780.ttbO}
rN loo1Mt StCIIIOe
to•••M.00
The Cemex recycled water pipeline serves as the primary backbone element of the system.
This project establishes a high-capacity transmission corridor extending from the SCLA recycled water system toward the Mojave River area, creating the foundation for both industrial reuse and future municipal system expansion. The conceptual design includes approximately 23,300 linear feet of 24-inch pipeline, along with a railroad crossing and metering facilities. Based on the planning-level estimate provided, the total cost for this backbone pipeline is approximately $20.4 million, including construction contingency and implementation costs.
53 Building upon this backbone, the second major component of the conceptual plan includes extending the system into the City to convert existing high-demand sites, such as parks, schools, and recreational facilities that use potable irrigation, to recycled water service. This phase focuses on locations where conversion provides the greatest immediate reduction in potable water demand.
The conceptual design includes two primary pipeline extensions totaling approximately 32,100 linear feet of 12-inch pipeline, a 120-horsepower booster pump station, a 1.5-million gallon recycled water storage tank, and site conversions for 12 irrigation customers. The total estimated capital cost for this phase is $21.07 million, inclusive of a 20% construction contingency and 25% implementation costs. Specifically, the cost estimate for the irrigation conversion system includes approximately $5.17 million for the first 15,600 linear feet of 12- inch pipeline and $5.46 million for the second 16,500 linear feet of pipeline. The booster pump station is estimated at $756,000, while the 1.5-million-gallon storage tank is estimated at $2.24 million. Site conversion costs for 12 locations are estimated at $900,000.
It is important to note that the irrigation conversion cost estimate assumes that the Cemex backbone pipeline has already been constructed. If the City elects to implement irrigation conversions independently of the Cemex project, the cost of extending the recycled water system to that backbone location would increase.
In total, the combined planning-level cost for these conceptual projects is approximately $41 million to $42 million. This estimate represents the foundational investment required to establish a functional backbone recycled water system capable of serving both industrial and municipal users. More importantly, this phased approach provides a practical and scalable pathway for the City to transition from localized recycled water use at SCLA to a broader, interconnected system that maximizes beneficial reuse, reduces reliance on groundwater, and supports long-term water supply sustainability, while allowing future development and additional users to connect to the backbone infrastructure without requiring significant redesign or redundant capital investment.
54 1 .&.
Table 3-6. Estimated lnfrastrudure Cost fot RW Service to Cemex Description
24-inch Pipeline
24-inch Pipeline,
Work1
Railroad Crossing,
and Bore
RW Meter and Vault
Subtotal
Quantity
18,400
Night 4,900
Jack 600
Construction Contingency, 20%
Implementation Costs2, 25%
Total, 2025 Dollars
Unit
LF
LF
LF
LS
Unit Cost Estimated Cost
$548 $10,075,000
$548 $3,354,000
$940 $564,000
$75,000 $75,000
$14,068,000
$2,814,000
$3,517,000
$20,399,000
'Assumed 25% Increase In pipeline unit cost to accommodate slower production during night work.
2Does not Include administrative, legal, envlronmental, or LAFCO costs to complete service agreement.
l.l.iSC -:;
Exhibit One: RW Service To
Cemex
-r·ica.-...,..,
�.....,d.,...,_
---
Recy<led W1tcr Sy,tan
t!J--
. --·--·---.......... .,__
- ::. ...... 1WIM ......
--•M,_ • .._,.,....,..
-�----
-- ,._.c..i,..,�
---
55 1 ..L '
Table 3-10. Estimated lnfrastrudure Cost to Convert City Irrigation Customers via Extended SCLA RW Supply
Ducription Quantity Unit Unit Cost Estimat•d Cost
Extension 1, 12-lnch Pipeline 15,600 LF $331 $5,165,000 Extension 2, 12-lnch Pipeline 16,500 LF $331 $5,463,000 Booster Pump Station 120 HP $6,300 $756,000 Exhibit Two: Convert City Irrigation Customer Via 1.5 MG RW Tank 1,500,000 Gal $1.49 $2,242,000 Extended SCLA RW Supply Site Conversion 12 EA $75,000 $900,000
Subtotal $14,526,000
Construction Contingency, 20% $2,905,200
Implementation Costs, 25% $3,632,000
Total, 2026 Dollars $21,070,000
� RWSr5le_11
F, --
-c.-ic• ....
- --�Nill�-
• • I
• 1·:0
e IO»
. ...
. ....
. ...
. ·•
!mgiltbn eor.-e-son
Propot!l!dPp,lon@< - ,_,.._.,_WW.,....... .....l( ..... I) ·-- ::-........... ,.,,... •• - �:(�tJ
�Abl(!P,�,e� ••• �
->
C..:.IIW,.._
.,.....c-.......... .::
56 Expected Outcomes
The CRWCS serves as an initial planning step that identifies potential reuse opportunities and establishes a roadmap for the future development of a Reclaimed Water Master Plan.
The primary objective of the planning effort is to identify strategies that increase the beneficial reuse of recycled water while reducing reliance on potable groundwater supplies.
Expanding recycled water use can help offset potable demand, reduce replacement water costs associated with pumping beyond the City's FPA, and improve the long-term resilience of the City's water supply. Over time, as the recycled water system expands and additional users connect, overall demand is expected to increase, improving economies of scale and enhancing cost recovery, while continuing to reduce the City's reliance on potable groundwater supplies.
For parks and schools specifically, the study identifies the conversion of these existing potable irrigation users as one of the most promising opportunities Citywide. It focuses on the highest-demand irrigation accounts and develops a practical extension concept from SCLA. This is important because it shows that a targeted approach to a relatively small number of large landscape users can meaningfully reduce potable demand. Under the concept that extends the recycled water system from SCLA, the study identifies customers that could be converted through two initial extensions.
Tabl• 3,,9. Cu,tonMn that could b. Conv•rt.d by Expanding the Ext.ting RW System ftom SCLA Cu,tom•r 0emand, AFY D•mand,MGO
Extension 1
Eva Dell Park 55 005
Old Vietor Park 9 001
Propond City Sports Center 49• 004
Vietor Valley Park and Mortuary 50 004
Extension 1 Total 162 0 14
Extension 2
Center StrHt Park 23 002
Vietor Valley High School 45 004
Sliva-Avina Partnership 04 00003
Vletorvllle Parks and Recreation 23 000 2
lrwln Academy School of
Performing Atta & Vietor 16 0001
Elementary Education
Vletorvllle City Library 34 0003
Doris Davies Park 47 004
Grffn TrH Golf Course 3S4 032
City of Victorville 14 0001
57 INCREASE PARKS, RECREATION, AND
CHILDREN'S PLAY AREAS
58 Pt.AV Ill P .AYGROUNO
Introduction
The Victorville parks system consists of approximately 316 acres that comprise 19 parks, including a golf course. Collectively these parks provide 24 baseball fields, 18 playgrounds, 10 tennis courts, 9 rectangular/multi-purpose fields, 5 walking loops, 2 main recreational buildings/gymnasiums, 2 fitness courses/areas, 1 aquatic facility, 1 trail system, and various other amenities. The City's parks and recreation facilities are currently deficient when compared to similar cities with comparable populations, demographics, and geographic size.
Some of Victorville's parks and recreation facilities were constructed in the 1970's and 1980's and have not undergone significant renovations to satisfy current national standards, primarily due to funding constraints. In consideration of the community profile and demographics, including projected population growth and demographic changes in comparison to the national standards established by the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA), the City falls short in several key categories. Victorville ranks below the median average in most categories except playgrounds, baseball fields and football fields.
Additionally, Victorville provides approximately 2.5 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, which falls short of the NRPA published benchmarks for similar sized agencies.
As is common in local agencies with parks and recreation systems, the associated cost for parks and recreation operations and maintenance is heavily subsidized in Victorville. While the City collects revenues from recreation programming registrations, lighting fees associated with evening field usage, and the rental of public spaces, these revenues are not sufficient to fully support operational costs. Priority projects listed in the Victorville Park & Recreation Master Plan, which incorporates community input, include two dog parks, walking paths, a park expansion, civic plaza park and community event venue, splash pad, park lighting enhancements, a sports complex, westside skate park, and westside pool complex.
In 2022, the City hired NBS to conduct a User Fee Study, which included a cost-of-service analysis, for evaluating and setting user fees. The analysis conducted for the Recreation Division, not including the cost of parks maintenance, revealed that the City only recovers approximately 48% of the full cost to provide services. While the City could increase fees to cover costs, it is preferred to keep costs affordable as a benefit to the community. This heavy subsidizing of operational costs is something that must be kept in mind when considering the addition of new parks and recreation amenities. Unfortunately, this often leads to parks and recreation funding being deprioritized when budget constraints develop and there are other local services competing for the same limited financial resources. Despite these funding challenges, studies show that an investment in park development can serve as a preventative public safety measure.
59 Parks and recreation are also vital to a community's quality of life in a variety of other ways. A report from the Trust for Public Land, referenced in the 2020 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, makes the following observations about the economic, environmental, social, and health benefits related to parks and open space:
• Physical activity makes people healthier.
• Physical activity increases with access to parks.
• Contact with the natural world improves physical and physiological health. • Residential and commercial property values increase.
• Benefits of tourism are enhanced.
• Trees are effective in improving air quality and act as natural air conditioners. • Trees assist with storm water control and erosion.
• Crime and juvenile delinquency are reduced.
• Stable neighborhoods and strong communities are created.
The level of service a City provides relative to parks and recreation is a reflection of community
values. Connection to community and a lifestyle focused on outdoor recreation and healthy living are a substantial init iative to promote a healthy community.
Existing Funding
Sources
The General Fund and Measure P are currently relied upon to subsidize park and recreation operations and to make incremental progress toward completing deferred maintenance; however, funding for major renovations of parks and recreation facilities is not available. As a result, there is a demonstrated need to identify new revenue sources to renovate existing facilities, develop additional parks and recreation facilities to meet modern expectations of Victorville's growing community, and to support a safer, healthier community. New parks and recreation development
projects are primarily funded through Parks & Recreation Development
Impact Fees (Parks & Rec DIF). Parks & Rec DIF are one-time fees charged to new
developments to help fund the infrastructure needed to sustain the existing level of service provided to the community. Therefore, parks and recreation projects funded by Parks & Rec DIF must add capacity to the existing parks system; the funds cannot be used for renovations or
maintenance. Parks & Rec DIF is only assessed to new residential development projects
and is collected from the developer at the time of f inal inspection or when a certificate of occupancy is issued.
60 Needs Analysis
To help enhance the Victorville parks system in order to better promote a safer and healthier community, the City plans and evaluates the development of new parks and recreation projects through structured planning frameworks
that combine long-range policy planning,
zoning regulations, environmental reviews, and public approval processes. A variety of policy and planning documents influence how the City prioritizes these projects. For example, the City's Strategic Plan identifies a goal of investing in infrastructure to create a healthy and livable
community. One strategy identified to help accomplish this goal is to implement priority projects identified in the 2020 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. In turn, the strategies and considerations outlined in this plan are relied upon by staff to develop Capital Improvement Plans and annual budget proposals for implementation.
The 2020
Parks and Recreation Master Plan recommended increasing total park acreage in the form of larger, more developed community parks with more amenities, as opposed to numerous smaller
neighborhood parks with fewer amenities. Additionally, the report outlined several opportunities to consider the addition of amenities such as walking trails, dog parks, splash pads, and skate parks to encourage more community participation. These strategies, in conjunction with increased vigilance to enhance public safety, are key factors to consider when prioritizing the use of available funding for new parks and recreation projects.
Since the
supply of Parks & Rec DIF revenue is driven by the rate of new residential development, the resulting revenue stream varies and can be difficult to predict. Each year, the DIF Capital Improvement Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Council, which includes a section outlining the priority projects identified for Parks & Rec DIF expenditures.
When enough funding has accumulated to fund the next priority project, it is proposed as a capital project in the next fiscal budget. Projects currently underway include two dog parks, walking paths, a new park restroom, and park expansion. 61 The following table outlines additional Parks & Rec DIF-eligible projects, in order of priority, with 1 being the highest:
Priority Level Project Name Funding Project Status Est. Cost Available? 1 Civic Plaza Yes In design, begin construction $19,917,081 Park/Police Station in FY 2027/2028 2 Sunset Ridge Yes Begin design FY 2027/2028 $2,488,419 Splash Pad 3 Park Lighting Yes Begin design FY 2028/2029 $200,000 Enhancements 4 Sports Complex Partially Begin design FY 2030/2031 $18,150,000 5 Westside Skate No N/A $4,000,000 Park
6 Westside Pool No N/A $11,000,000 Complex
In total, these improvements are estimated to cost $56.8 million. After considering the projects already budgeted for and in progress, the City is estimating an available cash balance of $20.5 million in the Parks & Rec DIF fund at the start of fiscal year 2026/2027.
Considering new DIF revenue & interest earned on the available fund balance, absent grant funding or donations, the City will have insufficient Parks & Rec DIF funding, more specifically an estimated shortfall of $23.6 million, to complete the remaining priority projects identified for development. When compared against the Parks & Rec DIF cash flow analysis, projected revenues do not keep pace with identified project needs. Additional funding sources are required to be able to complete the remaining priority projects, address any future project needs, and support any major renovation projects that are not eligible for Parks & Rec DIF funding. While the General Fund and Measure P help subsidize operating costs and a portion of deferred maintenance projects, these funding sources are not sufficient to support major renovations and the development of parks and recreation facilities. For these reasons, it is important for the City to identify and pursue additional funding sources, ensuring that these valuable community assets continue to serve residents now and into the future.
62 Expected Outcomes
There is a substantial need to identify funding sources to renovate and develop parks and recreation facilities in Victorville. The review of current and proposed parks and recreation projects highlights the increasing demand for amenities needed to serve the City's growing population. Parks play an important role in supporting community values by providing spaces where residents can relax, gather, play, and build connections with one another.
Access to well-maintained parks and recreation amenities also promotes healthy lifestyles by encouraging outdoor activity, physical fitness, and family engagement. In addition, elevating park spaces through thoughtful design, lighting, and programming can contribute to improved public safety by increasing community presence and reducing opportunities for nuisance or criminal behavior.
While existing Parks & Rec DIF funds can help support several priority projects, the projected costs of future improvements greatly exceed the projected available cash balance in the Parks & Rec DIF fund. Additionally, major park and recreation facility renovations that are not DIF-eligible are needed to meet national standards.
63 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
FINANCIAL NEEDS
The 25-26 Fiscal Year budget for the City is approximately $388 million, that budget combines cash resources fr om 87 different funds. Among those funds are general revenue funds, special revenue funds, enterprise revenue funds, and fiduciary funds. Only the General Fund can be spent on lawful public purposes, without restriction, and is most commonly what pays for public safety, parks and recreation, and homelessness-related solutions. Special revenue funds, enterprise revenue funds, and fiduciary funds collect revenue for a restrictive purpose.
Among the funds talked about in this report, the following will provide an example of the types of money that go into each type of fund.
• General Revenue Fund
o Sales tax, property tax, transient occupancy tax, building permit and business license fees (Fund 100) and Measure P transactions and use tax (Fund 105). • Special Revenue Fund
o Measure I and SBl (must be spent on road maintenance and reconstruction only). o Development Impact Fees, such as the Parks and Recreation DIF (can only be spent on projects that increase the capacity of parks and recreation facilities). o Storm Drain Fees (can only be spent on operations, maintenance, or capital improvement of the storm drain system).
• Enterprise Funds
o Water rates for domestic consumption (can only be spent on items related to the provision of water service).
The City's infrastructure needs are evaluated annually
and the most recent summary is provided in this
illustration.
In addition to identifying the infrastructure needs,
this section evaluates the effect on existing cash
balances of the fund accounts that could legally fund
these respective items. It will also evaluate what a
one-cent tax measure could pay for.
lltdau,,td
Wl1tt
tmS,,OYtmtftlS
S42M
��Sut, $86
&C,.,IC P1>z•
$91M
i II i
64 Roadway Improvements
The City receives revenue from two sources to pay for the operations and maintenance of its existing roadway system, the State (S81 [Funds 220 and 221]) and the County (Measure I [Fund 250]). These funds are restricted special funds that can only be spent on roadway maintenance and related safety improvements.
Currently, the 25-26 Fiscal Year budget estimates revenue from these sources to total $13.9 million. Approximately $6.5 million of the total budgeted revenue is reserved for capital improvements. Exhibit A illustrates how the budgeted revenue is planned over a five-year period, and it is important to note that, due to the limited amount of road funds, major projects like Mojave Drive and Air Expressway, get broken up into smaller phases. This creates a "pay as you go" situation and is not the most efficient or cost-effective approach to managing construction projects.
o In addition to the five-year plan described above, the illustration below shows the estimated amount of roadway improvements needed to improve the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) from its current rating of 65.7 to a PCI of 80. In summary, approximately $164 million is needed in present value dollars to improve the Citywide PCI. To maintain the existing PCI level of 65.7, this study estimated a total revenue budget of $20 million annually. This estimate is $13.5 million short of what is necessary to prevent the roadway conditions from continuing to decline.
Total Pavement Network Needs 2025
Today's Estimated Unlimited Budget Required for Pavement Projects Arterial Preservation Projects $13.9 million
Arterial Rehabilitation Projects
Collector Preservation Projects
Collector Rehabilitation Projects
Local Road Preservation Projects
local Road Rehabilitation Projects
$39.8 million
$4.7 million
$22.1 million
$29.4 million
$54.7 million
Total $164.6 million to an average PCI of 80
65 Public Safety - Police & Fire
Among the infrastructure needs analyzed, police and fire only have general funds to rely on to help it construct improvements. Cash flow forecasts of funds 100 and 105 have been prepared, and are included as Exhibit B and Exhibit C, to help decide if these funds could afford to take on added capital improvements.
Exhibit B includes a five-year forecast from the 26-27 Fiscal Year budget being proposed to the City Council in May of 2026. Though the General Fund is projected to have a starting cash balance of $87.4 million, which well exceeds its 17% reserve target of $20.75 million, over the 6-year period, the General Fund is projected to deficit spend to an ending 31-32 Fiscal Year cash balance of $28.51 million and exceeding its 17% reserve target of $23.82 million. The General Fund forecast does not include any capital expenditures after the upcoming 26-27 Fiscal Year, and it projects $4.69 million as surplus available for discretionary capital.
Similarly, Exhibit C forecasts the cash flow of Fund 105. Though Fund 105 is projected to have a starting cash balance of $38.06 million, which well exceeds its 17% reserve target of $5.76 million, over the 6-year period, Fund 105 is projected to deficit spend in the 27-28 Fiscal Year and practically break even every year thereafter. Its ending 31-32 Fiscal Year cash balance of $29.18 million exceeds its 17% reserve target of $6.49 million. An expected draw on cash for $20 million in the 27-28 Fiscal Year is money that has been saved to help defray the estimated total cost of $72.16 million to build a new police station. It shows $5.68 million as reserved for fire apparatus and a surplus of $17.02 million as available for discretionary capital.
Combined, funds 100 and 105 are projected to have $21.71 million available for discretionary capital. The cost to expand Fire Station 313 and construct two new fire stations is estimated to cost, at a present value, $39 million. The amount needed to complete the financing for a new police station is $52.16 million. The amount needed to fund police and fire facilities is $91.16 million. With only $21.71 million available, the City needs approximately $69.45 million to complete these projects.
o To illustrate the effect on cash visually, Exhibit D forecasts what the General Fund would look like if a 30-year debt issuance of $65 million was used to pay for the public safety projects. Exhibit E summarizes sources, uses of a proposed bond issuance, and estimates a maximum total annual debt service. Despite a proposed bond issuance costing $58.7 million in interest cost over the life of the debt, a maximum annual debt service totals approximately $4.02 million annually. Presuming a bond issuance occurs in the 26-27 Fiscal Year, the total debt service over the next five years amounts to $20.1 million. This scenario shows that in the 31-32 Fiscal Year, the General Fund reserve balance is 2%, well below the 17% reserve target and runs out of money in the 32-33 Fiscal Year. 66
Stormwater/Water Quality
Two limited funding sources exist to assist with the Stormwater/Water Quality improvements required throughout the City. Among those funds are a monthly $4 storm drain fee, which is charged to every improved parcel in the City. The storm drain fee is used to fund operations, maintenance, and capital. The table below forecasts operating revenue, total expenditures, and cashflow through the 31-32 Fiscal Year. In the 26-27 Fiscal Year, Fund 202 begins the year with an estimated cash balance of $6.02 million, it generates approximately $1.85 million and expends approximately $1.19 million. Forecasted through 2032, its cash balance available to take on additional capital is estimated at $7.07 million.
PUBLIC WORKS
CASH FLOW FOR FUND 202 (Storm Drain)
Updated. 5.5.26 MK FOR FY 2026-2027 THROUGH FY 2031-2032 PraaaYCI BLNINt F-t
2027 2028 2029 2030
Cash �hlnc4! (End of Prior YHr) s 6,018,349 s 6,176,853.93 s 6,418,395.19 s 6,634,694.23 Rev•nues
Eng,neerinc/Publ,c Worl(s • Use Fee s 1,700,000 s I, 717,000,00 s 1,734,170.00 s 1,751,511.70 Late Fees s 37,200 s 37,200.00 s 37,200.00 s 37,200.00
Interest Income s llS,000 s 115,000.00 s 115,000.00 s 115,000.00 MtK Revenue s s s
Storm ora,n Ut,hty Fee E111
Storm Ora,n Sale of Real Propeny
Reimbursements
Engineering Utility Fee
Total Rewnues $ 1,852,200 s 1.869,200 $ 1.886,370 $ 1,903,712 Expenses
PW Strom Drain Pet10nnel s 248.884 s 281.930 s 293.208 s 304,936 PW Operations and MalntenanQe s 489,555 s 519,982 s 535.582 5 551,649 Cost Alloallon s 162,562 s 167.439 s 162,850 s 167,736
ENG. Strom Draln Pet1011ntl s 43,061 s 35,934 s 37,371 s 38.866 ENG. Storm Draln O&M s ISO s 155 s 159 5 164
MS4 Stormwater Operations and Maintenance s 238,425 s 234,4S4 s 241,487 s 248,732 Storm ora,n une locatlJ18 Pe,,onnel s 10,194 s 24,068 s 2S,030 s 26,032 Storm Dra,n line locatlAg O&M s 863 s 2,447 s 2,521 s 2,596 Une�llectable Write-Offs
Acc:urals
Total [xptnses s !1193,695 s 1,266,409 s �z,a,:zoa s !1340,711 OP
NEW Aj)purten� nee Replacements $ 125,000 s 128,750 s 132,500 s 136,250 NEW Bear Valley Rd. Improvement Project $ 250,000
C.tyw,de Sto,m Dra,n App. Repl $ 125,000 $ 128,750 s 132,500 $ 136,250 Future CIP
s 103,750 s 106,863 s 110,068
TotalCIP s 500000 $ 361,250 $ 371,863 $ 312561
� �hlnce jEO::J s 6.176,154 $ 6,418,395 $ 6,634,694 $ 6,815,127 2031 2032
s 6,815,126.74 s 6,963,238.16
s 1,769.026.82 s 1,786, 717,09
s 37,200.00 s 37,200.00
s 115,000.00 s 115,000.00
s s
$ 1.921.227 $ 1,938,917
s 317,133 s 329,819
s 568,198 s 585,244
s 167.882 s 172,772
s 40,421 s 42,038
5 169 s 174
s 256,194 s 263,S.SO
s 27.073 s 28,156
s 2,674 s 2,754
s 1,379,745 s 1,424,&37
s 140,000 s 143,750
$ 140,000 $ 143,750
s 113,370 $ 116,772
$ 393,370 $ 404,272
s 6,963,238 $ 7,073,047
67 The second fund available to support Stormwater/Water Quality improvements is the Storm Drain DIF (Fund 357). Fund 357 revenue is collected through the development process and is collected at a time when construction of commercial, residential, or industrial projects are being completed. Fund 357 revenue can only be spent on capital that expands the capacity of the Citywide storm drain system. The table below forecasts operating revenue, total expenditures, and cashflow through the 31-32 Fiscal Year.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CASH FLOWS FOR FUND 3S7 • Storm Drain
Updated s s 26 MK FOR FY 202S-2026 THROUGH FY 2031-2032 l5!!lul
2027 2028 2029
Cash Balance (End of Prior Vear) s 5,347,350 s 3,934,861 s 4,619,861 s Revenues
u_soo Development Impact Fees s 500,000 s 505,000 s 510.050 s ,s110 Interest Income s 180,000 s 180,000 s 180,000 s
OIF Lo;,n Payment (Re<;eivable)
Total Revenues s 680,000 s 685,000 s 690,050 s
Expenses
Total Expenses s s s - s
OP
001,s Mojave Orlve - La Pai to El Evado s 842,490
NEW OP fY 2027
00156 Bear Valley Road Improvement s 750,000
61CM0 Storm Drain Improvement Muter Plan s 500,000
Total CIP Expen.ses s 2,092,490 s s - s
Cash Balance (EOV) s 3,934,861 s 4,619,861 s 5,309,911 s Forecast
2030 2031 2032
5,309,911 s 6,005,061 s 6,705,363
S1S,151 s 520,302 s 525,505
180,000 s 180,000 s 180,000
695,151 s 700,302 s 705,SOS
- s . s
- s - s
6,005,061 s 6,705,363 s 7,410,868
Fund 357 is projected to begin the 26-27 Fiscal Year with a beginning cash balance of $5.35 million. It constructs improvements based on cash available and routinely saves revenue generated until eventually having enough for the next construction project. Combined, Fund 202 and 357 are projected to have a surplus of $14.48 million. Citywide, the Stormwater/Water Quality improvements necessary are estimated at $353 million creating a $338.5 million shortfall.
68 Reclaimed Water System
An expansion of the existing reclaimed water system supplying a limited number of customers at the Southern California Logistics Airport has been identified as essential in being able to help the Victorville Water District in better protecting, maintaining, and supplying a clean drinking water supply. Currently, there is not an adopted master plan for a Citywide reclaimed water system, and because of that, there is not an adopted rate plan to support the development and expansion of the existing reclaimed water system. The only funding source that could help expand the reclaimed water system would be state and federal grants or money loaned or contributed by the City of Victorville. A new sales tax measure could be used to assist the City in helping its water district fund the construction pipelines that could ultimately connect reclaimed water customers. From a conceptual master plan, two phases of system development have been scoped and are estimated to cost $41.5 million in present value dollars.
69 Cl
Increasing Parks, Recreation, and
Children's Play Areas
...
Three funding sources exist to help pay for parks, recreation, and children's play areas, Fund 100, Fund 105, and the Parks & Rec DIF (Fund 354). As illustrated in Exhibit B and Exhibit C, Fund 100 and Fund 105 do not have capacity to take on new capital projects without falling below their respective reserve targets. The remaining funding source is Parks & Rec DIF, summarized in the table below.
.,..�......_(......,__lil,yl ..... ,
- ...... _ .. _ ·--- ----
....,..,rM\llilf'C1N..:&al
hftbNJrlo....,_.,,.....,0).11
.................... �,,
f..aMDerchl\P'Nf.H(ll)I}
w ..... ,. ...
• .,.., r..,.,.,..,.
CMt�•"-.,..,..._MIOl.Jt
lw"'M'I ... •�·-
. .,.�,.� -----
\Nnbl6tSuc•"-'
·--
c.-.... ec°'1
..,,
Je'UUJO
-
611,,0H
1,,,11',llt
,�,.,
,..,..,.
))"000
--
..., ...
Hlfi!,-1»
I
s s s
s s s s
I
I
I
I
s s s s s '
I
....
)t , .. ,,,,
-'""''" .........
,..,,,
IU1A_1U
..,.
U..11Q.-,SJ
!M:!Ml
f
s s
I
I
s
I
s
I
s
I
I
s
I
s s s
J
I
COMMUNITY �UV1ClS
CAs.H HOW JOA fUHO JS,4 (fl;a�\ & RH OIJ)
FOIi FY 1024 lOU THROUGH FY 20n lOJ.6
-- .... ,.,. ........ , I JJM»J\J s UK..!\'\ I
·- s - s - s
HU.tS s ,.., s '°""' I
1..IU,6d s - I -·- s
li.11t s 17,.)>0 I U,111 s
I s I
I s s
I s I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I
""11◄ s ,,_ s - s s s s ... ,..- s s s
1.-N,1.l)l ' ,..,,,. I w.n, I
lfOUSS I .y--,u,s • unoo
.... .. ..
u,,ou ' ,i,v, • '
- s - s ,._.., s I
......... I - I
� I IUU s s I
I s s I
I s s I
I I
I s s I
s
11.JliAm s s l.JU.4)] s s I
t.Ul1e* I 11tnJ110 I
• JI ,11 .... ' ,, . .... r
,0)4
--.,...,
U,i17.M1
._, ..., ...... ,,
s s
I
s s
I
s
I
I
I
I
s
I
s
- s
I
- I
lt."1 s ......
I
I
s
I
I
I
s
I
I
·- s ,...., I
tl'GI., ' lll<it-.
Parks & Rec DIF revenue is collected through the development process and is collected at a time when construction of commercial, residential, or industrial projects are being completed. Parks & Rec DIF revenue can only be spent on capital that expands the capacity of the Citywide Parks and Recreation space. The table above identifies a beginning cash balance of approximately $20.53 million and estimates $1.61 million of annual Parks & Rec DIF revenue and interest earnings. It also evaluates parks, recreation, and child play spaces found in the current Parks and Recreation Master Plan through the 35-36 Fiscal Year. The forecast for Fund 354 includes cash that can complete a new civic plaza in Fiscal Year 2028, it also forecasts a cash deficiency of approximately $23.6 million to complete the remaining capital projects included in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 70 TY JIAV
v1croRVILL6 Cl
FINANCIAL PLANNING
Based on the demonstrated need for funding, four financial models have been prepared and found in Exhibits F, G, H, and I. Each model relies on revenue from a new 1-cent sales tax measure generating approximately $30 million in the first year. They include conceptually, what capital improvements could be funded, based on priority and a need to provide funding to each of the infrastructure categories. These models consider different financing schedules for the $52.16 million needed to construct the police department and they all consider the flow of cash through the 36-37 fiscal year while respecting the City's minimum reserve requirement of 17%.
These cash flows are intended to provide a sense of what a $30 million tax measure could fund through 2037. During this measurement period, including projected interested earnings, the measure could generate approximately $541 million. While this amount does not fully pay for the total infrastructure needs of $865 million, this analysis does suggest that a new measure be approved without a sunset date. And, depending on which financing plan is selected, the $541 million can fund the following infrastructure categories:
• Roadway and Safety Improvements: $120.8 to 169.6 million • Police and Fire Stations: $71.6 to $108.1 million
• Stormwater/Water Quality Improvements: $30.8 to $36.6 million • Groundwater Supply/Reclaimed Water: $47.0 to $48.9 million • Parks, Recreation and Children's Play Areas: $26.2 to $40.7 million Over the course of ten full years of a new tax measure, after approval by the voters, Victorville could spend up to $404 million towards public infrastructure needs. 71 Resolution Number:
Resolution Approval Date:
Contact Person/Title:
Phone:
Email:
6/30/25 Carryover Balance $11,838,605.00
FY2025/26 Est. Revenue FY2026/27 Est. Revenue FY2027/28 Est. Revenue FY2028/29 Est. Revenue FY2029/30 Est. Revenue Total Est. Rev. $6,384,191 $6,561,656 $6,745,347 $6,936,225 $7,135,294 $33,762,712 Projects:
Mojave Dr, US-395 to Seventh St, pavement rehabilitation, road widening, storm drain No No 0.0% 0.0% $12,578,500 $5,955,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,955,000 Third Ave, pavement rehabilitation, road widening No No 0.0% 0.0% $850,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,000 Citywide Pavement Thermoplastic Re-Striping No No 0.0% 0.0% $210,000 $210,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $210,000 Air Expressway, National Trails Hwy to George Blvd, pavement rehabilitation No No 0.0% 0.0% $5,546,000 $0 $2,773,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,773,000 Bear Valley Rd, US 395 to Bellflower Rd, pavement rehabilitation No No 0.0% 0.0% $422,000 $0 $422,000 $0 $0 $0 $422,000 Amargosa Rd, Dos Palmas Rd to Vilage Dr, pavement rehabilitation No No 0.0% 0.0% $3,600,000 $0 $0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $1,800,000 El Evado Rd, Palmdale Rd to Begonia Rd, pavement rehabilitation No No 0.0% 0.0% $1,210,000 $0 $0 $605,000 $0 $0 $605,000 Mariposa Rd, Talpa St to Kingswood Dr, pavement rehabilitation No No 0.0% 0.0% $1,200,000 $0 $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $600,000 Air Expressway, George Blvd to Phantom West, pavement
rehabilitation No No 0.0% 0.0% $3,015,000 $0 $0 $1,507,500 $0 $0 $1,507,500 Ridgecrest Rd, Pahute Rd to Green Tree Blvd, pavement
rehabilitation No No 0.0% 0.0% $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000 $0 $1,300,000 La Paz Dr, I-15 Ramps to 7th St, pavement rehabilitation No No 0.0% 0.0% $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $569,000 $0 $569,000 Seventh St, Mariposa Rd to Lorene Dr, pavement rehabilitation No No 0.0% 0.0% $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $955,000 $0 $955,000 Hesperia Rd, Bear Valley Rd to Seneca Rd, pavement
rehabilitation No No 0.0% 0.0% $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 Concrete Access Ramps - various vocations No No 0.0% 0.0% $1,049,005 $575,000 $113,300 $116,699 $120,200 $123,806 $1,049,005 Concrete Sidewalk, Install or Repair - various locations No No 0.0% 0.0% $1,973,140 $371,650 $382,800 $394,283 $406,112 $418,295 $1,973,140 Traffic Signal Pedestrian System Upgrades No No 0.0% 0.0% $0 $6,750 $6,750 $6,750 $6,750 $6,750 $33,750 Traffic Signal UPS Replacement No No 0.0% 0.0% $0 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $225,000 Traffic Signal Video Detection Upgrades No No 0.0% 0.0% $0 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $125,000 Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation, Seals and Overlays, Various Streets No No 0.0% 0.0% $0 $1,600,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,600,000 Cost Allocation No No 0.0% 0.0% $0 $503,503 $518,608 $534,166 $550,191 $566,697 $2,673,166 Engineering Services No No 0.0% 0.0% $0 $177,680 $183,010 $188,501 $194,156 $199,980 $943,327 Engineering Services - Vehicle Replacements No No 0.0% 0.0% $45,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 Streets - Engineering No No 0.0% 0.0% $0 $1,002,629 $1,032,708 $1,063,689 $1,095,600 $1,128,468 $5,323,094 Traffic Signal Maintenance No No 0.0% 0.0% $0 $483,616 $498,124 $513,068 $528,460 $544,314 $2,567,583 Traffic Signal Maintenance - Traffic Management Center upgrades No No 0.0% 0.0% $12,500 $12,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,500 Traffic Control - Signing & Striping No No 0.0% 0.0% $0 $1,378,632 $1,419,991 $1,462,591 $1,506,468 $1,551,662 $7,319,345 $13,241,960 $8,420,291 $9,862,248 $8,301,937 $8,809,973 $48,636,409 Total Programming is currently 107% Total Estimated Programming: $48,636,409 Is Project in
City's
Non-motorized
Transportation
Plan?
(Yes/No)
Does Project
have an ATP
Component?
(Yes/No)
Is the Project on the City's
Nexus Study List?
(Public/DIF Share %)
Estimated Total
Project Cost
[email protected]
Projects Total:
Victorville
Current
Estimate
Current
Estimate TotalCurrent
Estimate
Current
Estimate
Current
Estimate
(Must not exceed 150% of Carryover Balance +
Total Estimated Revenue)
Jurisdiction:25-053
8/19/2025
Fredy A. Bonilla, City Engineer
760-955-5170
Measure I Local Pass-through Program
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Fiscal Years 2025/2026 thru 2029/2030
EXHIBIT A
72 Actuals Revised Budget YTD Actuuls Proposed Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Line Fiscal Year 2024/2025 2025/2026 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029 2029/2030 2030/2031 2031/2032 1 CASH ON HAND (Begin FY) 70,146,417$ 91,282,884$ 91,282,884$ 96,358,978$ 87,400,640$ 71,664,253$ 64,488,132$ 55,052,820$ 42,903,214$ 2 Revenues
3 Taxes - FY 25 Based on Actuals; Assumes 1% Annual Increase 6,970,143 6,873,900 5,439,427 7,007,409 7,077,483 7,148,258 7,219,741 7,291,938 7,364,857 4 Sales Tax - per HdL Projection (Reduced by SCLA Portion) 29,395,613 30,028,690 18,234,299 31,321,747 32,157,373 33,176,414 34,463,628 35,245,155 35,345,365 5 Property Tax - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 25,220,408 25,015,000 14,458,283 25,494,500 25,749,445 26,006,939 26,019,737 26,279,934 26,542,734 6 Licenses & Permits - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 2,593,638 2,477,000 2,192,203 2,446,100 2,470,561 2,495,267 2,520,219 2,545,421 2,570,876 7 Fines and Forfeitures-Assumes 1% Annual Increase 191,742 165,450 113,491 182,450 184,275 186,117 187,978 189,858 191,757 8 Intergovernmental - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 233,388 225,500 221,631 226,000 228,260 230,543 232,848 235,177 237,528 9 Charges for Services - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 5,067,587 3,796,756 3,516,853 4,044,911 4,085,360 4,126,214 4,167,476 4,209,151 4,251,242 10 Investment Income - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 4,518,528 4,168,433 5,651,838 4,558,080 4,603,661 4,649,697 4,696,194 4,743,156 4,790,588 11 Sales of Assets 44,791 - - - - - - - -
12 Pass Through - RPTTF 14,691,714 14,691,714 9,705,501 15,000,000 15,150,000 15,301,500 15,454,515 15,609,060 15,765,151 13 Transfers In - Assumes 1% Annual
Increase 34,062 34,000 34,340 34,683 35,030 35,381 35,734 14 Cost Allocations Received - CPI Increase FY 2027, 2% thereafter 10,318,724 10,805,041 8,190,485 11,248,265 11,473,230 11,702,695 11,936,748 12,175,483 12,418,993 15 Misc. Revenue - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 2,094,120 1,243,831 4,754,750 981,412 991,226 1,001,139 1,011,150 1,021,261 1,031,474 16 Strike Team Reimbursement - Not budgeted, Will present to Council as they occur. 662,678 - 315,252 - - - - - - 17 School Resource Officer (SRO)-Assumes 1% Annual Increase 2,244,647 1,188,991 1,051,575 1,282,270 1,295,093 1,308,044 1,321,124 1,334,335 1,347,679 18 Public Service Maintenance (Transfer from MS P) 7,156,284 14,210,477 14,210,477 8,795,852 - 11,314,488 11,595,268 11,839,062 13,006,113 19 Sheriff's Contract Credits - Dependent on vacancies, injuries; 3,021,010 2,902,896 2,619,381 500,000 550,000 605,000 665,500 732,050 805,255 20 Total Revenues 114,459,077$ 117,793,679 $ 90,675,447$ 113,122,996$ 106,050,306$ 119,286,997$ 121,527,157$ 123,486,423$ 125,705,345$ 21 22 Expenditures
23 Personnel excluding below - Assumes 3% Annual Increase 22,509,856 29,371,766 20,331,672 31,573,275 32,520,473 33,496,087 34,500,970 35,535,999 36,602,079 24 Fire Personnel - Assumes Increases Stipulated in Fire MOU; 3% Increases Thereafter 13,425,904 14,602,371 10,916,982 15,700,398 16,171,410 16,656,553 17,156,249 17,670,937 18,201,065 25 Code Compliance - Personnel Costs - Assumes 3% Annual Increase 840,199 502,162 586,891 627,582 646,409 665,801 685,775 706,349 727,539 26 Animal Control - Personnel Costs - Assumes 3% Annual Increase 352,230 1,256,768 613,756 779,523 802,909 826,996 851,806 877,360 903,681 27 Sheriff Contract - Assumes 6.3% FY 26, 10% FY27 ; 4% 28, 5% thereafter 35,422,823 35,980,025 26,722,029 39,543,841 41,125,594 43,181,874 45,340,968 47,608,016 49,988,417 28 Operations and Maintenance - Assumes 2.5% Annual Increase 18,594,338 21,723,637 17,270,566 23,569,235 24,158,466 24,762,428 25,381,489 26,016,026 26,666,426 29 Fire Operations & Maintenance - Assumes 2.5% Annual Increase 4,190,433 5,117,071 3,415,149 5,385,152 5,546,706 5,685,374 5,827,508 5,973,196 6,122,526 30 Code Compliance O&M - Assumes 2.5% Annual Increase 336,359 333,012 134,933 643,500 659,588 676,077 692,979 710,304 728,061 31 Animal Control O&M - Assumes 2.5% Annual Increase 101,462 191,510 70,237 139,496 142,984 146,558 150,222 153,978 157,827 32 Transfers Out - - - - - - - - -
34 M isc. Cha
rges - - - - - - - - -
35 Total Operating Expenditures 95,773,605 109,078,323 80,062,214 117,962,003 121,774,540 126,097,749 130,587,967 135,252,164 140,097,622 36 Capital 1,069,840 4,489,405 627,943 4,119,331 - - - - - 37 Total Expenditures 96,843,445$ 113,567,728$ 80,690,157$ 122,081,334$ 121,774,540$ 126,097,749$ 130,587,967$ 135,252,164$ 140,097,622$ 38 39 Add: Cash VMUS Loan Payment (VMUS Paid to General Fund) 1,000,000 850,143 - - - - - - - 40 Subtract: General Fund Subsidy of LTF (eff. FY2028) - - - - 12,154 365,368 374,502 383,865 41 Surplus/(Deficit) $ 18,615,632 $ 5,076,095 $ 9,985,290 $ (8,958,338) $ (15,736,388) $ (7,176,121) $ (9,435,312) $ (12,149,606) $ (14,392,277) 42 Prior Period Net Revenue/Expenditure Cash Related Transactions 2,520,834.84 43 44 Cash Balance 91,282,884$ 96,358,978$ 101,268,174$ 87,400,640$ 71,664,253$ 64,488,132$ 55,052,820$ 42,903,214$ 28,510,937$ 45 Cash Balance ($Mils) 91 96 101 87 72 64 55 43 29 46 Reserve Level Percent (Cash Balance / Total Expenditures ) 94% 85% 126% 72% 59% 51% 42% 32% 20% 47 General Fund Reserve Requirement 17% (Total Expenditures x 17% ) 16,463,386 19,306,514 13,717,327 20,753,827 20,701,672 21,436,617 22,199,954 22,992,868 23,816,596 48 General Fund Reserve Requirement ($Mils) 16 19 14 21 21 21 22 23 24 49 50 Surplus/(Deficit) Reserve for Capital 74,819,498 77,052,465 87,550,847 66,646,814 50,962,581 43,051,515 32,852,866 19,910,346 4,694,341 Total Restricted Cash 16,463,386 19,306,514 13,717,327 20,753,827 20,701,672 21,436,617 22,199,954 22,992,868 23,816,596 Total Unrestricted Cash 74,819,498 77,052,465 87,550,847 66,646,814 50,962,581 43,051,515 32,852,866 19,910,346 4,694,341 Cash Balance (EOY) 91,282,884 96,358,978 101,268,174 87,400,640 71,664,253 64,488,132 55,052,820 42,903,214 28,510,937 51 52 Public Sa
fety Maintenance (Old Method; for reference )
53 Public Safety Maintenance
54 Sheriff Increase Over FY21 Baseline ($29,072,435) 6,350,388 6,907,590 (2,350,406) 10,471,406 12,053,159 14,109,439 16,268,533 18,535,581 20,915,982 55 Fire Increase Over FY21 Baseline (Personnel + O&M) ($9,388,583 + $3,232,942) 4,994,812 7,097,917 1,710,606 8,464,025 9,096,592 9,720,402 10,362,232 11,022,608 11,702,066 56 Code Compliance Over FY21 Baseline (Personnel + O&M) ($491,891 + $309,662) 375,006 33,622 (79,729) 469,529 504,444 540,326 577,202 615,100 654,048 57 Animal Control Over FY21 Baseline (Personnel + O&M) ($701,404 + $418,662) (666,408) 328,179 (436,107) (201,080) (174,207) (146,545) (118,071) (88,761) (58,591) 58 Revenue Necessary to Maintain Baseline Public Safety 11,053,799 14,367,307 (1,155,636) 19,203,880 21,479,988 24,223,622 27,089,896 30,084,528 33,213,505 59 CITY OF VICTORVILLE
CASH FLOW FOR FUND 100 - GENERAL FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2027-2032 - 3% COLA
EXHIBIT B
73 Actuals Revised Budget YTD Actuals Proposed Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Line Fiscal Year 2024/2025 2025/2026 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029 2029/2030 2030/2031 2031/2032 1 CASH ON HAND (Begin FY) 50,590,108$ 62,150,359$ 62,150,359$ 38,055,022$ 38,055,022$ 29,089,910$ 29,102,693$ 29,122,346$ 29,149,205$ 2 Revenues
3S a l e s T a x 29,066,067 28,469,000 17,444,504 30,340,000 31,146,000 32,128,000 33,130,000 34,121,000 34,462,210 4 Fines and Forfeitures 95 - - - - - - - -
5 Licenses & Permits 226,570 210,000 201,680 222,000 224,220 226,462 228,727 231,014 233,324 8 Charges for Services 912,086 946,000 847,048 940,300 949,703 959,200 968,792 978,480 988,265 9 Investment Income 4,409,057 1,500,000 1,011,812 2,000,000 2,020,000 2,040,200 2,060,602 2,081,208 2,102,020 13 Misc. Revenue 3,837,276 8,500 6,328 8,500 8,585 8,671 8,758 8,845 8,934 14 Deputy at Mall with Macerich 317,152 338,219 300,485 372,040 375,760 379,518 383,313 387,146 391,018 15 Total Revenues 38,768,304$ 31,471,719$ 19,811,858$ 33,882,841$ 34,724,269$ 35,742,052$ 36,780,193$ 37,807,695$ 38,185,773$ 16 17 Expenditures
18 Personnel 2,871,459 4,430,663 2,026,502 3,705,745 3,816,918 3,931,425 4,049,368 4,170,849 4,295,974 19 Fire Personnel - Assumes Increases Stipulated in Fire MOU; 3% Increases Thereafter 4,342,470 5,340,230 3,776,716 6,034,138 6,215,162 6,401,617 6,593,665 6,791,475 6,995,220 20 Code Compliance - Personnel Costs - Assumes 3% Annual Increase 1,457,770 1,850,966 1,273,467 1,885,564 1,942,131 2,000,395 2,060,407 2,122,219 2,185,886 21 Animal Control - Personnel Costs - Assumes 3% Annual Increase 582,290 707,706 784,089 964,473 993,407 1,023,209 1,053,905 1,085,522 1,118,088 22 Sheriff Contract - Assumes 6.3% FY 26, 10% FY27 ; 4% 28, 5% thereafter 2,660,026 3,019,071 2,332,089 3,321,118 3,453,963 3,626,661 3,807,994 3,998,394 4,198,313 23 Operations & Maintenance 2,686,343 3,723,557 827,851 3,400,851 3,502,877 3,607,963 3,716,202 3,827,688 3,942,518 24 Fire Operations & Maintenance - Assumes 3% Annual Increase 834,845 1,095,611 526,993 836,660 861,760 887,613 914,241 941,668 969,918 25 Code Compliance O&M - Assumes 3% Annual Increase 218,386 451,659 128,516 529,927 545,825 562,200 579,066 596,438 614,331 26 Animal Control O&M - Assumes 3% Annual Increase 94,457 125,286 70,601 117,806 121,340 124,981 128,730 132,592 136,570 27 Cost Allocation Paid 608,321 1,189,126 311,765 623,529 636,000 648,720 661,694 674,928 688,4 26 28 Transfers Out ( Transfer Cash to Fund 260 Wellness Center) - 1,356,189 1,356,189 - - - - - - 29 Wellness Center Backstop - 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 - 30 Public Safety Maintenance Level 7,156,284 14,210,477 14,210,477 8,795,852 - 11,314,488 11,595,268 11,839,062 13,006,113 31 Total Operating Expenditures 23,512,652 39,100,541 29,225,255 31,815,663 23,689,381 35,729,270 36,760,540 37,780,835 38,151,358 32 Capital
Capital (Excluding Police Station and Fire Apparatus) 4,848,753 15,166,515 3,285,071 2,067,178 Fire Engine ( Per Tony to be Purchased FY26) - 1,300,000 - - - - - - - Police Station 20,000,000
33 Total Expenditures 28,361,405$ 55,567,056$ 32,510,326$ 33,882,841$ 43,689,381$ 35,729,270$ 36,760,540$ 37,780,835$ 38,151,358$ 34 35 Surplus/(Deficit) $ 10,406,899 $ (24,095,337) $ (12,698,468) $ - $ (8,965,112) $ 12,782 $ 19,653 $ 26,860 $ 34,415 36 Prior Period Net Revenue/Expenditure Cash Related Transactions $ 1,153,352 37 38 Cash Balance 62,150,359$ 38,055,022$ 49,451,891$ 38,055,022$ 29,089,910$ 29,102,693$ 29,122,346$ 29,149,205$ 29,183,620$ 39 Cash Balance ($Mils) 61 38 49 38 29 29 29 29 29
40 Reserve Level Percent (Cash Balance / Total Expenditures ) 215% 68% 152% 112% 67% 81% 79% 77% 76% 41 General Fund Reserve Requirement 17% (Total Expenditures x 17% ) 4,821,439 9,446,399 5,526,755 5,760,083 7,427,195 6,073,976 6,249,292 6,422,742 6,485,731 42 General Fund Reserve Requirement ($Mils) 5 9 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 43 44 Surplus/(Deficit) Reserve for Capital 56,175,568 28,608,623 43,925,136 32,294,939 21,662,715 23,028,717 22,873,054 22,726,463 22,697,889 45 46 Public Safety Maintenance
47 Surplus Reserve for Fire Apparatus 1,550,000 1,025,000 1,025,000 1,800,000 2,575,000 3,350,000 4,125,000 4,900,000 5,675,000 48 Surplus Reserve for Police Station 12,000,000 16,000,000 16,000,000 20,000,000 49 Surplus Reserve for Other Capital 42,625,568 11,583,623 26,900,136 10,494,939 19,087,715 19,678,717 18,748,054 17,826,463 17,022,889 50 51
52 Total Restricte
d Cash 4,821,438.81 9,446,399.49 5,526,755.41 5,760,082.97 7,427,194.84 6,073,975.86 6,249,291.74 6,422,741.95 6,485,730.84 53 Total Unrestricted Cash 56,175,568.08 28,608,622.83 43,925,135.97 32,294,939.35 21,662,715.46 23,028,716.79 22,873,053.93 22,726,463.25 22,697,888.96 54 Cash Balance (EOY) 60,997,006.89 38,055,022.32 49,451,891.38 38,055,022.32 29,089,910.31 29,102,692.65 29,122,345.66 29,149,205.20 29,183,619.81 55 56
57 Public Safety Maintenance
58 Public Safety Maintenance
59 Percent of Measure P Revenue for PSM - 17,445,736.62$ 14,162,273.48$ 8,915,336.10$ 15,247,278.45$ -$ 16,083,923.45$ 16,551,086.69$ 17,013,462.55$ 17,183,597.63$ 60 15,247,278.45$
15,247,278.45$ (8,965,112.01)$ 16,096,705.80$ 16,570,739.70$ 17,040,322.09$ 17,218,012.23$
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
CASH FLOW FOR FUND 105 - MEASURE P FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2027-2032 - 3% COLA
EXHIBIT C
74 Actuals YTD Revised Budget Proposed Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Line Fiscal Year 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029 2029/2030 2030/2031 2031/2032 2032/2033 2033/2034 2034/2035 2035/2036 2036/2037 1 CASH ON HAND (Begin FY) 70,146,417$ 91,282,884$ 95,165,017$ 95,165,017$ 84,242,785$ 67,900,600$ 49,586,347$ 27,681,325$ 2,674,780$ (26,712,513)$ (59,169,095)$ (95,637,638)$ (136,345,308)$ 2 Revenues
3 Taxes - FY 25 Based on Actuals; Assumes 1% Annual Increase 6,970,143 6,873,900 7,339,400 7,412,794 7,486,922 7,561,791 7,637,409 7,713,783 7,790,921 7,868,830 7,947,519 8,026,994 8,107,264 4 Sales Tax - per HdL Projection 29,395,613 30,028,690 31,561,747 32,399,773 33,421,238 34,463,628 35,494,899 35,849,848 36,208,346 36,570,430 36,936,134 37,305,496 37,678,551 5 Property Tax - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 25,220,408 25,015,000 25,494,500 25,749,445 26,006,939 26,267,009 26,529,679 26,794,976 27,062,925 27,333,555 27,606,890 27,882,959 28,161,789 6 Licenses & Permits - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 2,593,638 2,477,000 2,458,600 2,483,186 2,508,018 2,533,098 2,558,429 2,584,013 2,609,853 2,635,952 2,662,311 2,688,935 2,715,824 7 Fines and Forfeitures-Assumes 1% Annual Increase 191,742 165,450 180,950 182,760 184,587 186,433 188,297 190,180 192,082 194,003 195,943 197,902 199,881 8 Intergovernmental - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 233,388 225,500 226,000 228,260 230,543 232,848 235,177 237,528 239,904 242,303 244,726 247,173 249,645 9 Charges for Services - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 5,067,587 3,796,756 3,931,111 3,970,422 4,010,126 4,050,228 4,090,730 4,131,637 4,172,954 4,214,683 4,256,830 4,299,398 4,342,392 10 Investment Income - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 4,518,528 4,168,433 4,558,080 4,603,661 4,649,697 4,696,194 4,743,156 4,790,588 4,838,494 4,886,879 4,935,747 4,985,105 5,034,956 11 Sales of Asse
ts 44,791 - - - - -
12 Pass Through - RPTTF 14,691,714 14,691,714 13,500,000 13,635,000 13,771,350 13,909,064 14,048,154 14,188,636 14,330,522 14,473,827 14,618,566 14,764,751 14,912,399 13 Transfers In - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 34,062 - - - - - - - - - - 14 Cost Allocations Received - CPI Increase FY 2026, 2% thereafter 10,318,724 10,805,041 11,248,265 11,360,747 11,587,962 11,819,721 12,056,116 12,297,238 12,543,183 12,794,047 13,049,928 13,310,926 13,577,145 15 Misc. Revenue - Assumes 1% Annual Increase 2,094,120 1,243,831 1,014,912 1,025,061 1,035,312 1,045,665 1,056,122 1,066,683 1,077,350 1,088,123 1,099,004 1,109,994 1,121,094 16 Strike Team Reimbursement - Not budgeted, Will present to Council as they occur. 662,678 - 17 School Resource Officer (SRO)-Assumes 1% Annual Increase 2,244,647 1,188,991 1,165,700 1,177,357 1,189,131 1,201,022 1,213,032 1,225,162 1,237,414 1,249,788 1,262,286 1,274,909 1,287,658 18 Public Service Maintenance (Transfer from MS P) 7,156,284 14,210,477 15,232,059 8,518,535 5,835,860 6,391,093 5,495,367 5,540,295 4,856,603 5,663,628 5,709,847 5,723,982 383,068 19 Sheriff's Contract Credits - Dependent on vacancies, injuries; 3,021,010 2,902,896 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 20 Total Revenues 114,459,077$ 117,507,407$ 117,507,407$ 113,247,001$ 112,417,685$ 114,857,794$ 115,846,567$ 117,110,568$ 117,660,551$ 119,716,047$ 121,025,731$ 122,318,524$ 118,271,665$ 21 22 Expenditures
23 Personnel excluding below - Assumes 3% Annual Increase 22,509,856 29,408,167 30,361,101 31,271,934 32,210,092 33,176,394 34,171,686 35,196,837 36,252,742 37,340,324 38,460,534 39,614,350 40,802,780 24 Fire Personnel - Assumes Increases Stipulated in Fire MOU; 3% Increases Thereafter 13,425,904 15,492,521 15,436,365 15,899,456 16,376,440 16,867,733 17,373,765 17,894,978 18,431,828 18,984,782 19,554,326 20,140,956 20,745,184 25 Code Compliance - Personnel Costs - Assumes 3% Annual Increase 840,199 502,162 591,175 608,910 627,177 645,992 665,372 685,333 705,893 727,070 748,882 771,349 794,489 26 Animal Control - Personnel Costs - Assumes 3% Annual Increase 352,230 1,220,367 926,330 954,120 982,743 1,012,225 1,042,592 1,073,870 1,106,086 1,139,269 1,173,447 1,208,650 1,244,910 27 Sheriff Contract - Assumes 6.3% FY 26, 4% FY27 & 28, 5% thereafter 35,422,823 35,980,025 37,779,026 39,667,977 41,651,376 43,733,945 45,920,642 48,216,674 50,627,508 53,158,883 55,816,827 58,607,669 61,538,052 28 Operations and Maintenance - Assumes 2.5% Annual Increase 18,594,338 21,989,517 24,681,375 25,298,410 25,930,870 26,579,142 27,243,620 27,924,711 28,622,828 29,338,399 30,071,859 30,823,656 31,594,247 29 Fire Operations & Maintenance - Assumes 2.5% Annual Increase 4,190,433 5,117,071 5,498,448 5,663,401 5,804,986 5,950,111 6,098,863 6,251,335 6,407,618 6,567,809 6,732,004 6,900,304 7,072,812 30 Code Compliance O&M - Assumes 2.5% Annual Increase 336,359 333,012 617,374 632,808 648,628 664,844 681,465 698,502 715,964 733,863 752,210 771,015 790,290 31 Animal Cont
rol O&M - Assumes 2.5% Annual Increase 101,462 191,510 141,526 145,064 148,690 152,408 156,218 160,123 164,126 168,229 172,435 176,746 181,165 32 Transfers Out
34 Misc. Charges -
35 Total Operating Expenditures 95,773,605 109,919,885 109,919,885 120,142,079 124,381,002 128,782,794 133,354,224 138,102,363 143,034,594 148,158,629 153,482,524 159,014,694 164,763,930 Debt Service 4,015,000 4,013,500 4,014,750 4,013,500 4,014,750 4,013,250 4,014,000 4,011,750 4,011,500 4,013,000 36 Capital 1,069,840 4,263,525 3,901,334 - - - - - - - - - 37 Total Expenditures 96,843,445$ 114,475,417$ 114,475,417$ 124,157,079$ 128,394,502$ 132,797,544$ 137,367,724$ 142,117,113$ 147,047,844$ 152,172,629$ 157,494,274$ 163,026,194$ 168,776,930$ 38 39 Add: Cash VMUS Loan Payment
(VMUS Paid to General Fund) 1,000,000 850,143
40 Subtract: General Fund Subsidy of LTF (eff. FY2025) 12,154 365,368 374,502 383,865 41 Surplus/(Deficit) $ 18,615,632 $ 3,882,133 $ 3,882,133 $ (10,922,232) $ (16,342,185) $ (18,314,252) $ (21,905,022) $ (25,006,545) $ (29,387,293) $ (32,456,582) $ (36,468,543) $ (40,707,670) $ (50,505,265) 42 Prior Period Net Revenue/Expenditure Cash Related Transactions 2,520,834.84 43 44 Cash Balance 91,282,884$ 95,165,017$ 99,047,149$ 84,242,785$ 67,900,600$ 49,586,347$ 27,681,325$ 2,674,780$ (26,712,513)$ (59,169,095)$ (95,637,638)$ (136,345,308)$ (186,850,573)$ 45 Cash Balance ($Mils) 91 95 99 84 68 50 28 3 (27) (59) (96) (136) (187) 46 Reserve Level Percent (Cash Balance / Total Expenditures ) 94% 83% 87% 68% 53% 37% 20% 2% -18% -39% -61% -84% -111% 47 General Fund Reserve Requirement 17% (Total Expenditures x 17% ) 16,463,386 19,460,821 19,460,821 21,106,703 21,827,065 22,575,582 23,352,513 24,159,909 24,998,133 25,869,347 26,774,027 27,714,453 28,692,078 48 General Fund Reserve Requirement ($Mils) 16 19 19 21 22 23 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 49 50 Surplus/(Deficit) Reserve for Capital 74,819,498 75,704,196 79,586,328 63,136,081 46,073,534 27,010,765 4,328,812 (21,485,129) (51,710,647) (85,038,442) (122,411,665) (164,059,761) (215,542,651) Total Restricted Cash 16,463,386 19,460,821 19,460,821 21,106,703 21,827,065 22,575,582 23,352,513 24,159,909 24,998,133 25,869,347 26,774,027 27,714,453 28,692,078 Total Unrestricted C
ash 74,819,498 75,704,196 79,586,328 63,136,081 46,073,534 27,010,765 4,328,812 (21,485,129) (51,710,647) (85,038,442) (122,411,665) (164,059,761) (215,542,651) Cash Balance (EOY) 91,282,884 95,165,017 99,047,149 84,242,785 67,900,600 49,586,347 27,681,325 2,674,780 (26,712,513) (59,169,095) (95,637,638) (136,345,308) (186,850,573) 51 52 Public Safety Maintenance (Old Method; for reference ) 53 Public Safety Maintenance
54 Sheriff Increase Over FY21 Baseline ($29,072,435) 6,350,388 6,907,590 8,706,591 10,595,542 12,578,941 14,661,510 16,848,207 19,144,239 21,555,073 24,086,448 26,744,392 29,535,234 32,465,617 55 Fire Increase Over FY21 Baseline (Personnel + O&M) ($9,388,583 + $3,232,942) 4,994,812 7,988,067 8,313,288 8,941,333 9,559,901 10,196,319 10,851,104 11,524,789 12,217,921 12,931,067 13,664,805 14,419,735 15,196,471 56 Code Compliance Over FY21 Baseline (Personnel + O&M) ($491,891 + $309,662) 375,006 33,622 406,995 440,165 474,252 509,283 545,284 582,282 620,305 659,381 699,539 740,811 783,227 57 Animal Control Over FY21 Baseline (Personnel + O&M) ($701,404 + $418,662) (666,408) 291,778 (52,244) (20,916) 11,334 44,533 78,710 113,894 150,113 187,398 225,782 265,297 305,975 58 Revenue Necessary to Maintain Baseline Public Safety 11,053,799 15,221,056 17,374,630 19,956,123 22,624,429 25,411,646 28,323, 306 31,365,203 34,543,411 37,864,294 41,334,519 44,961,076 48,751,290 59 *Note - Cost Allocation on cash flow different from Budget due to no chnage to CDBG allocation
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
CASH FLOW FOR FUND 100 - GENERAL FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2037
EXHIBIT D
75 Dec 11, 2025 12:40 pm Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 8.901 Beaumont:VICT_JPA-2026LRBS) Page 1
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
Victorville Joint Powers Financing Authority
Series 2026 Lease Revenue Bonds
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assumes S&P A+Underlying/AA insured Rates as of December 10, 2025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sources:
Bond Proceeds:
Par Amount 61,700,000.00
Premium 4,374,044.15
66,074,044.15
Uses:
Project Fund Deposits:
Project Fund 65,000,000.00
Delivery Date Expenses:
Cost of Issuance 250,000.00
Underwriter's Discount 308,500.00
Insurance (35 bps) 421,417.50
Surety (225 bps) 90,365.63
1,070,283.13
Other Uses of Funds:
Additional Proceeds 3,761.02
66,074,044.15
EXHIBIT E
76 Dec 11, 2025 12:40 pm Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 8.901 Beaumont:VICT_JPA-2026LRBS) Page 2
BOND SUMMARY STATISTICS
Victorville Joint Powers Financing Authority
Series 2026 Lease Revenue Bonds
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assumes S&P A+Underlying/AA insured Rates as of December 10, 2025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated Date 05/01/2026
Delivery Date 05/01/2026
Last Maturity 05/01/2056
Arbitrage Yield 4.357021%
True Interest Cost (TIC) 4.519228%
Net Interest Cost (NIC) 4.653731%
All-In TIC 4.551736%
Average Coupon 5.000000%
Average Life (years) 19.029
Duration of Issue (years) 12.087
Par Amount 61,700,000.00
Bond Proceeds 66,074,044.15
Total Interest 58,705,000.00
Net Interest 54,639,455.85
Total Debt Service 120,405,000.00
Maximum Annual Debt Service 4,016,250.00
Average Annual Debt Service 4,013,500.00
Underwriter's Fees (per $1000)
Average Takedown
Other Fee 5.000000
Total Underwriter's Discount 5.000000
Bid Price 106.589213
Par Average Average
Bond Component Value Price Coupon Life
Serial Bond 30,710,000.00 111.339 5.000% 12.096
Term Bond 2051 13,620,000.00 103.420 5.000% 23.097
Term Bond 2056 17,370,000.00 102.452 5.000% 28.097
61,700,000.00 19.029
All-In Arbitrage
TIC TIC Yield
Par Value 61,700,000.00 61,700,000.00 61,700,000.00
+ Accrued Interest
+ Premium (Discount) 4,374,044.15 4,374,044.15 4,374,044.15 - Underwriter's Discount (308,500.00) (308,500.00)
- Cost of Issuance Expense (250,000.00)
- Other Amounts (511,783.13) (511,783.13) (511,783.13)
Target Value 65,253,761.02 65,003,761.02 65,562,261.02
Target Date 05/01/2026 05/01/2026 05/01/2026
Yield 4.519228% 4.551736% 4.357021%
77 Dec 11, 2025 12:40 pm Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 8.901 Beaumont:VICT_JPA-2026LRBS) Page 3
BOND PRICING
Victorville Joint Powers Financing Authority
Series 2026 Lease Revenue Bonds
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assumes S&P A+Underlying/AA insured Rates as of December 10, 2025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maturity
Bond Component Date Amount Rate Yield Price
Serial Bond:
05/01/2027 930,000 5.000% 2.510% 102.443
05/01/2028 975,000 5.000% 2.460% 104.927
05/01/2029 1,025,000 5.000% 2.460% 107.302
05/01/2030 1,075,000 5.000% 2.440% 109.699
05/01/2031 1,130,000 5.000% 2.480% 111.781
05/01/2032 1,185,000 5.000% 2.540% 113.610
05/01/2033 1,245,000 5.000% 2.620% 115.131
05/01/2034 1,305,000 5.000% 2.690% 116.527
05/01/2035 1,370,000 5.000% 2.760% 117.743
05/01/2036 1,440,000 5.000% 2.880% 118.306
05/01/2037 1,515,000 5. 000% 3.050% 116.698 C
05/01/2038 1,590,000 5. 000% 3.200% 115.300 C
05/01/2039 1,670,000 5. 000% 3.320% 114.196 C
05/01/2040 1,750,000 5. 000% 3.450% 113.015 C
05/01/2041 1,840,000 5. 000% 3.600% 111.670 C
05/01/2042 1,930,000 5. 000% 3.760% 110.256 C
05/01/2043 2,025,000 5. 000% 3.890% 109.123 C
05/01/2044 2,130,000 5. 000% 4.030% 107.918 C
05/01/2045 2,235,000 5. 000% 4.150% 106.899 C
05/01/2046 2,345,000 5. 000% 4.230% 106.225 C
30,710,000
Term Bond 2051:
05/01/2051 13,620,000 5. 000% 4.570% 103.420 C
Term Bond 2056:
05/01/2056 17,370,000 5. 000% 4.690% 102.452 C
61,700,000
Dated Date 05/01/2026
Delivery Date 05/01/2026
First Coupon 11/01/2026
Par Amount 61,700,000.00
Premium 4,374,044.15
Production 66,074,044.15 107.089213%
Underwriter's Discount (308,500.00) (0.500000%)
Purchase Price 65,765,544.15 106.589213%
Accrued Interest
Net Proceeds 65,765,544.15
78 Dec 11, 2025 12:40 pm Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 8.901 Beaumont:VICT_JPA-2026LRBS) Page 4
BOND DEBT SERVICE
Victorville Joint Powers Financing Authority
Series 2026 Lease Revenue Bonds
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assumes S&P A+Underlying/AA insured Rates as of December 10, 2025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Annual
Period Debt Debt
Ending Principal Coupon Interest Service Service
11/01/2026 1,542,500 1,542,500
05/01/2027 930,000 5.000% 1,542,500 2,472,500 4,015,000 11/01/2027 1,519,250 1,519,250
05/01/2028 975,000 5.000% 1,519,250 2,494,250 4,013,500 11/01/2028 1,494,875 1,494,875
05/01/2029 1,025,000 5.000% 1,494,875 2,519,875 4,014,750 11/01/2029 1,469,250 1,469,250
05/01/2030 1,075,000 5.000% 1,469,250 2,544,250 4,013,500 11/01/2030 1,442,375 1,442,375
05/01/2031 1,130,000 5.000% 1,442,375 2,572,375 4,014,750 11/01/2031 1,414,125 1,414,125
05/01/2032 1,185,000 5.000% 1,414,125 2,599,125 4,013,250 11/01/2032 1,384,500 1,384,500
05/01/2033 1,245,000 5.000% 1,384,500 2,629,500 4,014,000 11/01/2033 1,353,375 1,353,375
05/01/2034 1,305,000 5.000% 1,353,375 2,658,375 4,011,750 11/01/2034 1,320,750 1,320,750
05/01/2035 1,370,000 5.000% 1,320,750 2,690,750 4,011,500 11/01/2035 1,286,500 1,286,500
05/01/2036 1,440,000 5.000% 1,286,500 2,726,500 4,013,000 11/01/2036 1,250,500 1,250,500
05/01/2037 1,515,000 5.000% 1,250,500 2,765,500 4,016,000 11/01/2037 1,212,625 1,212,625
05/01/2038 1,590,000 5.000% 1,212,625 2,802,625 4,015,250 11/01/2038 1,172,875 1,172,875
05/01/2039 1,670,000 5.000% 1,172,875 2,842,875 4,015,750 11/01/2039 1,131,125 1,131,125
05/01/2040 1,750,000 5.000% 1,131,125 2,881,125 4,012,250 11/01/2040 1,087,375 1,087,375
05/01/2041 1,840,000 5.000% 1,087,375 2,927,375 4,014,750 11/01/2041 1,041,375 1,041,375
05/01/2042 1,930,000 5.000% 1,041,375 2,971,375 4,012,750 11/01/2042 993,125 993,125
05/01/2043 2,025,000 5.000% 993,125 3,018,125 4,011,250 11/01/2043 942,500 942,500
05/01/2044 2,130,000 5.000% 942,500 3,072,500 4,015,000 11/01/2044 889,250 889,250
05/01/2045 2,235,000 5.000% 889,250 3,124,250 4,013,500 11/01/2045 833,375 833,375
05/01/2046 2,345,000 5.000% 833,375 3,178,375 4,011,750 11/01/2046 774,750 774,750
05/01/2047 2,465,000 5.000% 774,750 3,239,750 4,014,500 11/01/2047 713,125 713,125
05/01/2048 2,590,000 5.000% 713,125 3,303,125 4,016,250 11/01/2048 648,375 648,375
05/01/2049 2,715,000 5.000% 648,375 3,363,375 4,011,750 11/01/2049 580,500 580,500
05/01/2050 2,855,000 5.000% 580,500 3,435,500 4,016,000 11/01/2050 509,125 509,125
05/01/2051 2,995,000 5.000% 509,125 3,504,125 4,013,250 11/01/2051 434,250 434,250
05/01/2052 3,145,000 5.000% 434,250 3,579,250 4,013,500 11/01/2052 355,625 355,625
05/01/2053 3,300,000 5.000% 355,625 3,655,625 4,011,250 11/01/2053 273,125 273,125
05/01/2054 3,465,000 5.000% 273,125 3,738,125 4,011,250 11/01/2054 186,500 186,500
05/01/2055 3,640,000 5.000% 186,500 3,826,500 4,013,000 11/01/2055 95,500 95,500
05/01/2056 3,820,000 5.000% 95,500 3,915,500 4,011,000
61,700,000 58,705,000 120,405,000 120,405,000
79 Dec 11, 2025 12:40 pm Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 8.901 Beaumont:VICT_JPA-2026LRBS) Page 5
BOND DEBT SERVICE
Victorville Joint Powers Financing Authority
Series 2026 Lease Revenue Bonds
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assumes S&P A+Underlying/AA insured Rates as of December 10, 2025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Period Debt
Ending Principal Coupon Interest Service
05/01/2027 930,000 5.000% 3,085,000 4,015,000
05/01/2028 975,000 5.000% 3,038,500 4,013,500
05/01/2029 1,025,000 5.000% 2,989,750 4,014,750
05/01/2030 1,075,000 5.000% 2,938,500 4,013,500
05/01/2031 1,130,000 5.000% 2,884,750 4,014,750
05/01/2032 1,185,000 5.000% 2,828,250 4,013,250
05/01/2033 1,245,000 5.000% 2,769,000 4,014,000
05/01/2034 1,305,000 5.000% 2,706,750 4,011,750
05/01/2035 1,370,000 5.000% 2,641,500 4,011,500
05/01/2036 1,440,000 5.000% 2,573,000 4,013,000
05/01/2037 1,515,000 5.000% 2,501,000 4,016,000
05/01/2038 1,590,000 5.000% 2,425,250 4,015,250
05/01/2039 1,670,000 5.000% 2,345,750 4,015,750
05/01/2040 1,750,000 5.000% 2,262,250 4,012,250
05/01/2041 1,840,000 5.000% 2,174,750 4,014,750
05/01/2042 1,930,000 5.000% 2,082,750 4,012,750
05/01/2043 2,025,000 5.000% 1,986,250 4,011,250
05/01/2044 2,130,000 5.000% 1,885,000 4,015,000
05/01/2045 2,235,000 5.000% 1,778,500 4,013,500
05/01/2046 2,345,000 5.000% 1,666,750 4,011,750
05/01/2047 2,465,000 5.000% 1,549,500 4,014,500
05/01/2048 2,590,000 5.000% 1,426,250 4,016,250
05/01/2049 2,715,000 5.000% 1,296,750 4,011,750
05/01/2050 2,855,000 5.000% 1,161,000 4,016,000
05/01/2051 2,995,000 5.000% 1,018,250 4,013,250
05/01/2052 3,145,000 5. 000% 868,500 4,013,500
05/01/2053 3,300,000 5. 000% 711,250 4,011,250
05/01/2054 3,465,000 5. 000% 546,250 4,011,250
05/01/2055 3,640,000 5. 000% 373,000 4,013,000
05/01/2056 3,820,000 5. 000% 191,000 4,011,000
61,700,000 58,705,000 120,405,000
80 Dec 11, 2025 12:40 pm Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 8.901 Beaumont:VICT_JPA-2026LRBS) Page 6
PROJECT FUND
Victorville Joint Powers Financing Authority
Series 2026 Lease Revenue Bonds
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assumes S&P A+Underlying/AA insured Rates as of December 10, 2025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Fund (PROJ)
Interest Scheduled
Date Deposit @ 4.3570211% Principal Draws Balance
05/01/2026 65,000,000 65,000,000 65,000,000
65,000,000 0 65,000,000 65,000,000
Arbitrage Yield: 4.3570211%
81 Dec 11, 2025 12:40 pm Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 8.901 Beaumont:VICT_JPA-2026LRBS) Page 7
FORMULA VERIFICATION
Victorville Joint Powers Financing Authority
Series 2026 Lease Revenue Bonds
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assumes S&P A+Underlying/AA insured Rates as of December 10, 2025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component Formula Value
INS .35% of total adjusted Debt Service 421,417.50
SRTY Maximum annual Debt Service * 2.25% 90,365.63
SRTY 10% of Reasonable Par Amount * 2.25% 148,666.60
SRTY 125% of average annual adjust ed Debt Service * 2.25% 112,879.69 SRTY Surety (225 bps) 90,365.63
82 Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Fo recast Foreca st Forecast Line Fiscal Year 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029 2029/2030 2030/2031 2031/2032 2032/2033 2033/2034 2034/2035 2035/2036 2036/2037 1 CASH ON HAND (Begin FY) -$ 5,208,367$ 6,620,685$ 6,023,009$ 6,642,905$ 7,562,080$ 7,962,895$ 13,324,744$ 8,882,626$ 6,728,210$ 8,269,768$ 2 Revenues
3S a l e s T a x 5,056,666.67 31,146,000 32,128,000 33,130,000 34,121,000 34,462,210 34,806,832 35,154,900 35,506,449 35,861,514 36,220,129 4 Interest Income 151,700 934,380 963,840 993,900 1,023,630 1,033,866 1,044,205 1,054,647 1,065,193 1,075,845 1,086,604 5 6 Total Revenues 5,208,367$ 32,080,380 $ 33,091,840 $ 34,123,900$ 35,144,630$ 35,496,076$ 35,851,037$ 36,209,547$ 36,571,643$ 36,937,359$ 37,306,733$ 7 8 Expenditures
9 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
10 0 0000000 00 0
11 0 0000000 00 0
12 0 0000000 00 0
13 Total Operating Expenditures - - - - - - - - - - - 14 Capital - -
15 Police Station - 5 Year Interfund loan -$ 11,735,538$ 11,735,538$ 11,735,538$ 11,735,538$ 11,735,538$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 16 Fire 0 0000000 00 0
17 Fire Station - Expansion of 313 0 10,533,37 8000000 00 0 18 Fire Station 316 - New 4 bay station 0 0 0 0 8,694,556 6,567,288 0 0 0 0 0 19 Fire Station 317 - New 3 bay station 0 000000 7 ,283,928 6,523,866 5,375,666 0 20 Roads: 0 0000000 00 0
21 Street Preservation Treatments – Slurry Seal & Mi cro Surfacing 0 2,121,800 2,185,454 2,251,018 2,318,548 2,388,105 2,459,748 2,533,540 2,609,546 2,687,833 2,768,468 22 Consultant Services: Citywide Street Rehab Projects 0 212,180 218,545 225,102 231,855 238,810 245,975 253,354 260,955 268,783 276,847 23 Construction: Citywide Street Rehab Projects 0 0 2,185,454 2,251,018 2,318,548 2,388,105 2,459,748 2,533,540 2,609,546 2,687,833 6,921,169 24 Consultant Services Citywide Street Reconstruction Projects 0 1,273,080 1,311,272 1,350,611 1,391,129 1,432,863 1,475,849 1,520,124 1,565,728 1,612,700 1,661,081 25 Construction: Citywide Street Reconstruction Projects 0 0 0 5,064,790 5,216,733 5,373,235 5,534,432 5,700,465 5,871,479 6,047,624 13,150,222 26 Traffic Signals 0 1,060,900 1,092,727 0 0 0 3,689,622 2,533,540 2,609,546 2,687,833 5,536,935 27 Storm Water 0 0000000 00 0
28 Storm Drain Reconstruction 0 0 546,364 3,376,5260000 00 0 29 Storm Drain Crossing 0 0 819,545 2,251,018 2,318,548 2,388,105 2,459,748 5,067,080 0 2,687,833 2,768,468 30 S torm Drain Construction 0 0000000 0 671,958 5,536,935 31 Groundwater 0 0000000 00 0
32 RW Service to Cemex Design & 2 yrs. Of Construction 0 3,731,185 13,594,617 4,998,3850000 00 0 33 Extended SCLA RW Supply 0 0000000 00 0
34 E xtension 1, 12-inch pipeline design and construction 0 0000 1 ,541,880 7,622,758 0 0 0 0 35 S ite Conversion, design and construction 0 0000 4 4,777 221,377 0 0 0 0 36 E xtension 2, 12-inch pipeline design and construction 0 000000 1 ,730,155 4,276,786 4,405,089 0 37 B ooster Pump Station, design and construction 0 0000 327,290 1,011,079 0 0 0 0 38 1 .5 MG RW Tank, design and construction 0 0000 669,266 3,308,853 0 0 0 0 39 S ite Conversion, design and construction 0 0000000 244,645 1,209,525 0 40 Parks: 0 0000000 00 0
41 S ports Complex 0 000000 1 1,495,938 11,840,817 0 0
42 W est Side Skate Park 0 0000000 313,146 5,053,126 0
43 Total Expenditures -$ 30,668,061$ 33,689,516$ 33,504,004$ 34,225,455$ 35,095,261$ 30,489,188$ 40,651,665$ 38,726,060$ 35,395,801$ 38,620,125$ 44 45 Surplus/(Deficit) Revenues over Expenditures $ 5,208,367 $ 1,412,319 $ (597,676) $ 619,896 $ 919,175 $ 400,815 $ 5,361,849 $ (4,442,118) $ (2,154,417) $ 1,541,559 $ (1,313,392) 46 47
Cash Balance (End of FY) $ 5,208,367 $ 6,620,685 $ 6,023,009 $ 6,642,905 $ 7,562,080 $ 7,962,895 $ 13,324,744 $ 8,882,626 $ 6,728,210 $ 8,269,768 $ 6,956,376 48 Ca
sh Balance ($M
ils) 5 7 6 7 8 8 13 9 7 8 7
49 Re
serve Level Percent (Cash Balance / Total Expenditures) 100% 22% 18% 20% 22% 23% 44% 22% 17% 23% 18% 50 General Fund Reserve Requirement 17% (Total Expenditures x 17% ) - 5,213,570 5,727,218 5,695,681 5,818,327 5,966,194 5,183,162 6,910,783 6,583,430 6,017,286 6,565,421 51 General Fund Reserve Requirement ($Mils) - 5 6 6 6 6 5 7 7 6 7 52 53 Surplus/(Deficit) Reserve for Capital 1,407,115 295,791 947,224 1,743,752 1,996,701 8,141,582 1,971,843 144,780 2,252,482 390,955 54 55 Public Safety Maintenance
56 Surplus Reserve
57 58 CPI for Expenditures 3.00%
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
CASH FLOW - NEW TAX MEASURE - INTERFUND LOAN FOR 5 YEARS FISCAL YEAR 2028-2037
EXHIBIT F
83 Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Fore cast Forecast Forecast For ecast Forecast Line Fiscal Year 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029 2029/2030 2030/2031 2031/2032 2032/2033 2033/2034 2034/2035 2035/2036 2036/2037 1 CASH ON HAND (Begin FY) -$ 5,208,367$ 5,541,111$ 8,627,323$ 12,750,239$ 14,143,209$ 7,773,385$ 12,612,735$ 12,458,450$ 9,839,124$ 8,709,727$ 2 Revenues
3S a l e s T a x 5,056,666.67 31,146,000 32,128,000 33,130,000 34,121,000 34,462,210 34,806,832 35,154,900 35,506,449 35,861,514 36,220,129 4 Interest Income 151,700 934,380 963,840 993,900 1,023,630 1,033,866 1,044,205 1,054,647 1,065,193 1,075,845 1,086,604 5 6 Total Revenues 5,208,367$ 32,080,380 $ 33,091,840 $ 34,123,900$ 35,144,630$ 35,496,076$ 35,851,037$ 36,209,547$ 36,571,643$ 36,937,359$ 37,306,733$ 7 8 Expenditures
9 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
10 0 0000000 00 0
11 0 0000000 00 0
12 0 0000000 00 0
13 Total Operating Expenditures - - - - - - - - - - - 14 Capital - -
15 Police Station - 10 Year Interfund loan -$ 6,449,712$ 6,449,712$ 6,449,712$ 6,449,712$ 6,449,712$ 6,449,712$ 6,449,712$ 6,449,712$ 6,449,712$ 6,449,712$ 16 Fire 0 0000000 00 0
17 Fire Station - Expansion of 313 0 10,533,37 8000000 00 0 18 Fire Station 316 - New 4 bay station 0 0 0 0 8,694,556 6,567,288 0 0 0 0 0 19 Fire Station 317 - New 3 bay station 0 0000000 1 0,447,958 7,379,243 0 20 Roads: 0 0000000 00 0
21 Street Preservation Treatments – Slurry Seal & Mi cro Surfacing 0 2,121,800 2,185,454 2,251,018 2,318,548 2,388,105 2,459,748 2,533,540 2,609,546 2,687,833 2,768,468 22 Consultant Services: Citywide Street Rehab Projects 0 212,180 218,545 225,102 231,855 238,810 245,975 253,354 260,955 268,783 276,847 23 Construction: Citywide Street Rehab Projects 0 0 2,185,454 2,251,018 2,318,548 2,388,105 2,459,748 2,533,540 2,609,546 2,687,833 2,768,468 24 Consultant Services Citywide Street Reconstruction Projects 0 1,273,080 1,311,272 1,350,611 1,391,129 1,432,863 1,475,849 1,520,124 1,565,728 1,612,700 1,661,081 25 Construction: Citywide Street Reconstruction Projects 0 0 0 5,064,790 5,216,733 5,373,235 5,534,432 5,700,465 5,871,479 6,047,624 6,229,052 26 Traffic Signals 0 1,060,900 1,092,727 1,125,509 1,159,274 1,194,052 1,229,874 1,266,770 1,304,773 1,343,916 1,384,234 27 Storm Water 0 0000000 00 0
28 Storm Drain Reconstruction 0 530,450 0 3,376,5260000 00 0 29 Storm Drain Crossing 0 0 819,545 4,502,035 0 4,776,209 0 5,067,080 0 5,375,666 0 30 S torm Drain Construction 0 0000000 0 671,958 5,536,935 31 Groundwater 0 0000000 00 0
32 RW Service to Cemex Design & 2 yrs. Of Construction 0 9,566,135 12,437,419 00000 0 0 33 Extended SCLA RW Supply 0 0000000 00 0
34 Extension 1, 12-inch pipeline design and construction 0 0 0 0 1,496,971 7,400,736 0 0 0 0 0 35 S ite Conversion, design and construction 0 0000 4 4,777 221,377 0 0 0 0 36 E xtension 2, 12-inch pipeline design and construction 0 000000 1 ,730,155 2,185,200 2,936,726 3,024,828 37 Booster Pump Station, design and construction 0 0 0 0 317,757 0 1,011,079 0 0 0 0 38 1.5 MG RW Tank, design and construction 0 0 0 0 649,773 0 3,308,853 0 0 0 0 39 S ite Conversion, design and construction 0 0000000 244,645 604,762 622,905 40 Parks: 0 0000000 00 0
41 Sports Complex 0 0 3,305,499 3,404,664 3,506,804 3,612,008 3,720,368 3,831,979 0 42 W est Side Pool Complex 0 00000 2 ,894,672 5,477,113 5,641,426 0 0 43 W est Side Skate Park 0 0000000 332,216
44 Total Expenditures -$ 31,747,635$ 30,005,628$ 30,000,984$ 33,751,660$ 41,865,900$ 31,011,687$ 36,363,833$ 39,190,969$ 38,066,756$ 31,054,746$ 45 46 Surplus/(Deficit) Revenues over Expenditures $ 5,208,367 $ 332,745 $ 3,086,212 $ 4,122,916 $ 1,392,970 $ (6,369,824) $ 4,839,350 $ (154,286) $ (2,619,326) $ (1,129,397) $ 6,251,987 47 48
Cash Balance (End of FY) $ 5,208,367 $ 5,541,111 $ 8,627,323 $ 12,750,239 $ 14,143,209 $ 7,773,385 $ 12,612,735 $ 12,458,450 $ 9,839,124 $ 8,709,727 $ 14,961,714 49 Cas
h Balanc
e ($Mils) 5 6 9 13 14 8 13 12 10 9 15
50 Reserve Level Percent (Cash Balance / Total Expenditures) 100% 17% 29% 42% 42% 19% 41% 34% 25% 23% 48% 51 General Fund Reserve Requirement 17% (Total Expenditures x 17% ) - 5,397,098 5,100,957 5,100,167 5,737,782 7,117,203 5,271,987 6,181,852 6,662,465 6,471,349 5,279,307 52 General Fund Reserve Requirement ($Mils) - 5 5 5 6 7 5 6 7 6 5 53 54 Surplus/(Deficit) Reserve for Capital 144,013 3,526,366 7,650,072 8,405,427 656,182 7,340,749 6,276,598 3,176,659 2,238,378 9,682,407 55 56 Public Safety Maintenance
57 Surplus Reserve
58 CPI for Expenditures 3.00%
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
CASH FLOW - NEW TAX MEASURE - INTERFUND LOAN FOR 10 YEARS FISCAL YEAR 2028-2037
EXHIBIT G
84 Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Foreca st Forecast Fore cast Forecast Line Fiscal Year 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029 2029/2030 2030/2031 2031/2032 2032/2033 2033/2034 2034/2035 2035/2036 2036/2037 1 CASH ON HAND (Begin FY) -$ 5,208,367$ 7,447,049$ 12,254,337$ 24,852,202$ 20,925,322$ 9,025,240$ 18,048,843$ 17,086,444$ 13,393,679$ 9,892,962$ 2 Revenues
3S a l e s T a x 5,056,666.67 31,146,000 32,128,000 33,130,000 34,121,000 34,462,210 34,806,832 35,154,900 35,506,449 35,861,514 36,220,129 4 Interest Income 151,700 934,380 963,840 993,900 1,023,630 1,033,866 1,044,205 1,054,647 1,065,193 1,075,845 1,086,604 5 6 Total Revenues 5,208,367$ 32,080,380 $ 33,091,840 $ 34,123,900$ 35,144,630$ 35,496,076$ 35,851,037$ 36,209,547$ 36,571,643$ 36,937,359$ 37,306,733$ 7 8 Expenditures
9 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
10 0 0000000 00 0
11 0 0000000 00 0
12 0 0000000 00 0
13 Total Operating Expenditures - - - - - - - - - - - 14 Capital - -
15 Police Station - 10 Year Interfund loan -$ 4,755,954$ 4,755,954$ 4,755,954$ 4,755,954$ 4,755,954$ 4,755,954$ 4,755,954$ 4,755,954$ 4,755,954$ 4,755,954$ 16 Fire 0 0000000 00 0
17 Fire Station - Expansion of 313 0 10,533,37 8000000 00 0 18 Fire Station 316 - New 4 bay station 0 0 0 0 8,694,556 6,567,288 0 0 0 0 0 19 Fire Station 317 - New 3 bay station 0 0000000 1 0,447,958 7,379,243 0 20 Roads: 0 0000000 00 0
21 Street Preservation Treatments – Slurry Seal & Mi cro Surfacing 0 2,121,800 2,185,454 2,251,018 2,318,548 2,388,105 2,459,748 2,533,540 2,609,546 2,687,833 2,768,468 22 Consultant Services: Citywide Street Rehab Projects 0 218,545 225,102 231,855 238,810 245,975 253,354 260,955 268,783 276,847 23 Construction: Citywide Street Rehab Projects 0 0 2,185,454 2,251,018 2,318,548 2,388,105 2,459,748 2,533,540 2,609,546 2,687,833 2,768,468 24 Consultant Services Citywide Street Reconstruction Projects 0 1,273,080 1,311,272 1,350,611 1,391,129 1,432,863 1,475,849 1,520,124 1,565,728 1,612,700 1,661,081 25 Construction: Citywide Street Reconstruction Projects 0 0 0 5,064,790 5,216,733 5,373,235 5,534,432 5,700,465 5,871,479 6,047,624 6,229,052 26 Traffic Signals 0 1,060,900 1,092,727 1,125,509 1,159,274 1,194,052 2,459,748 2,533,540 2,609,546 2,687,833 2,768,468 27 Storm Water 0 0000000 00 0
28 Storm Drain Reconstruction 0 530,450 3,278,181 00000 00 0 29 Storm Drain Crossing 0 0 819,545 4,502,035 0 4,776,209 0 5,067,080 0 5,375,666 0 30 S torm Drain Construction 0 0000000 0 671,958 5,536,935 31 Groundwater
32 RW Service to Cemex Design & 2 yrs. Of Construction 0 9,566,135 12,437,419 00000 0 0 33 Extended SCLA RW Supply 0 0000000 00 0
34 Extension 1, 12-inch pipeline design and construction 0 0 0 0 1,496,971 7,400,736 0 0 0 0 0 35 S ite Conversion, design and construction 0 0000 4 4,777 221,377 0 0 0 0 36 E xtension 2, 12-inch pipeline design and construction 0 000000 6 ,797,235 3,334,478 0 0 37 Booster Pump Station, design and construction 0 0 0 0 317,757 0 1,011,079 0 0 0 0 38 1.5 MG RW Tank, design and construction 0 0 0 0 649,773 0 3,308,853 0 0 0 0 39 S ite Conversion, design and construction 0 0000000 244,645 1,209,525 0 40 Parks: 0 0000000 00 0
41 Sports Complex 0 0 0 0 10,520,412 10,836,025 0 0 0 0 0 42 W est Side Pool Complex 0 00000 2 ,894,672 5,477,113 5,641,426 0 0 43 W est Side Skate Park 0 0000000 313,146 5,053,126 0
44 Total Expenditures -$ 29,841,697$ 28,284,552$ 21,526,035$ 39,071,510$ 47,396,159$ 26,827,434$ 37,171,946$ 40,264,408$ 40,438,076$ 26,765,273$ 45 46 Surplus/(Deficit) Revenues over Expenditures $ 5,208,367 $ 2,238,683 $ 4,807,288 $ 12,597,865 $ (3,926,880) $ (11,900,082) $ 9,023,603 $ (962,399) $ (3,692,765) $ (3,500,717) $ 10,541,460 47 48
Cash Balance (End of FY) $ 5,208,367 $ 7,447,049 $ 12,254,337 $ 24,852,202 $ 20,925,322 $ 9,025,240 $ 18,048,843 $ 17,086,444 $ 13,393,679 $ 9,892,962 $ 20,434,423 49 Cash
Balance ($M
ils) 5 7 12 25 21 9 18 17 13 10 20
50 Reserve Level Percent (Cash Balance / Total Expenditures) 100% 25% 43% 115% 54% 19% 67% 46% 33% 24% 76% 51 General Fund Reserve Requirement 17% (Total Expenditures x 17% ) - 5,073,089 4,808,374 3,659,426 6,642,157 8,057,347 4,560,664 6,319,231 6,844,949 6,874,473 4,550,096 52 General Fund Reserve Requirement ($Mils) - 5 5 4 7 8 5 6 7 7 5 53 54 Surplus/(Deficit) Reserve for Capital 2,373,961 7,445,964 21,192,776 14,283,165 967,893 13,488,179 10,767,213 6,548,730 3,018,489 15,884,326 55 56 Public Safety Maintenance
57 Surplus Reserve
58 CPI for Expenditures 3.00%
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
CASH FLOW - NEW TAX MEASURE- PRIVATE LENDING FOR 15 YEARS FISCAL YEAR 2028-2037
EXHIBIT H
85 Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast Foreca st Forecast Fore cast Forecast Line Fiscal Year 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029 2029/2030 2030/2031 2031/2032 2032/2033 2033/2034 2034/2035 2035/2036 2036/2037 1 CASH ON HAND (Begin FY) -$ 5,208,367$ 13,735,151$ 7,718,721$ 7,718,721$ 7,403,499$ 8,905,038$ 7,080,685$ 8,537,043$ 11,239,681$ 7,799,163$ 2 Revenues
3S a l e s T a x 5,056,666.67 31,146,000 32,128,000 33,130,000 34,121,000 34,462,210 34,806,832 35,154,900 35,506,449 35,861,514 36,220,129 4 Interest Income 151,700 934,380 963,840 993,900 1,023,630 1,033,866 1,044,205 1,054,647 1,065,193 1,075,845 1,086,604 5 6 Total Revenues 5,208,367$ 32,080,380 $ 33,091,840 $ 34,123,900$ 35,144,630$ 35,496,076$ 35,851,037$ 36,209,547$ 36,571,643$ 36,937,359$ 37,306,733$ 7 8 Expenditures
9 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
10 0 0000000 00 0
11 0 0000000 00 0
12 0 0000000 00 0
13 Total Operating Expenditures - - - - - - - - - - - 14 Capital - -
15 Police Station - 10 Year Interfund loan -$ 4,015,000$ 4,013,500$ 4,014,750$ 4,013,500$ 4,014,750$ 4,013,250$ 4,014,000$ 4,011,750$ 4,011,500$ 4,013,000$ 16 Fire 0 0000000 00 0
17 Fire Station 316 - New 4 bay station 0 0 6,648,901 6,753,0530000 00 0 18 Fire Station 317 - New 3 bay station 0 0000 2 ,567,212 15,496,411 0 0 0 0 19 Roads: 0 0000000 00 0
20 Street Preservation Treatments – Slurry Seal & Mi cro Surfacing 0 2,121,800 2,185,454 2,251,018 2,318,548 2,388,105 2,459,748 2,533,540 2,609,546 2,687,833 2,768,468 21 Consultant Services: Citywide Street Rehab Projects 0 212,180 218,545 225,102 231,855 238,810 245,975 253,354 260,955 268,783 276,847 22 Construction: Citywide Street Rehab Projects 0 0 2,185,454 2,251,018 2,318,548 2,388,105 2,459,748 2,533,540 6,523,866 6,719,582 6,921,169 23 Consultant Services Citywide Street Reconstruction Projects 0 1,273,080 1,311,272 1,350,611 1,391,129 1,432,863 1,475,849 1,520,124 1,565,728 1,612,700 1,661,081 24 Construction: Citywide Street Reconstruction Projects 0 3,713,150 3,824,545 5,064,790 6,376,007 5,373,235 5,534,432 9,500,776 9,785,799 10,079,373 10,381,754 25 Traffic Signals 0 2,121,800 2,185,454 2,251,018 2,318,548 2,388,105 2,459,748 2,533,540 2,609,546 2,687,833 2,768,468 26 Storm Water 0 0000000 00 0
27 Storm Drain Reconstruction 0 530,450 3,278,181 00000 00 0 28 Storm Drain Crossing 0 0 819,545 4,502,035 0 4,776,209 0 5,067,080 2,609,546 5,375,666 3,460,585 29 S torm Drain Construction 0 0000000 0 671,958 5,536,935 30 Groundwater 0 0000000 00 0
31 RW Service to Cemex Design & 2 yrs. Of Construction 0 9,566,135 12,437,419 00000 00 0 32 Extended SCLA RW Supply 0 0000000 00 0
33 Extension 1, 12-inch pipeline design and construction 0 0 0 0 1,496,971 7,400,736 0 0 0 0 0 34 S ite Conversion, design and construction 0 0000 4 4,777 221,377 0 0 0 0 35 E xtension 2, 12-inch pipeline design and construction 0 000000 6 ,797,235 3,334,478 0 0 36 Booster Pump Station, design and construction 0 0 0 0 317,757 981,630 0 0 0 0 0 37 1.5 MG RW Tank, design and construction 0 0 0 0 649,773 0 3,308,853 0 0 0 0 38 S ite Conversion, design and construction 0 0000000 244,645 1,209,525 0 39 Parks: 0 0000000 00 0
40 Sports Complex 0 0 0 6,809,328 14,027,216000 00 0
42 W est Side Skate Park 0 0000000 313,146 5,053,126 0
43 Total Expenditures -$ 23,553,595$ 39,108,270$ 35,472,721$ 35,459,853$ 33,994,537$ 37,675,390$ 34,753,189$ 33,869,005$ 40,377,877$ 37,788,306$ 44 45 Surplus/(Deficit) Revenues over Expenditures $ 5,208,367 $ 8,526,785 $ (6,016,430) $ (1,348,821) $ (315,223) $ 1,501,539 $ (1,824,353) $ 1,456,358 $ 2,702,638 $ (3,440,518) $ (481,574) 46 47
Cash Balance $ 5,208,367 $ 13,735,151 $ 7,718,721 $ 6,369,900 $ 7,403,499 $ 8,905,038 $ 7,080,685 $ 8,537,043 $ 11,239,681 $ 7,799,163 $ 7,317,589 48 Cash Balanc
e ($Mils
) 5 14 8 6 7 9 7 9 11 8 7
49 Reserve Level Percent (Cash Balance / Total Expenditures) 100% 58% 20% 18% 21% 26% 19% 25% 33% 19% 19% 50 Reserve Requirement 17% (Total Expenditures x 17% ) - 4,004,111 6,648,406 6,030,363 6,028,175 5,779,071 6,404,816 5,908,042 5,757,731 6,864,239 6,424,012 51 Reserve Requirement ($Mils) - 4 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 6
52 53 Surplus/(Deficit) Reserve for Capital 9,731,040 1,070,316 339,538 1,375,324 3,125,966 675,869 2,629,001 5,481,950 934,924 893,577 54 55 Public Safety Maintenance
56 Surplus Reserve
CPI for Expenditures 3.00%
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
CASH FLOW - NEW TAX MEASURE - DEBT SERVICE FOR 30 YEARS FISCAL YEAR 2028-2037
EXHIBIT I
86 Item Number: 8
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: May 19, 2026
Submitted By:
Jennifer Thompson, City Clerk
Andre de Bortnowsky, Legal Counsel
Subject:
Policy regarding disruption of telephonic or internet services occurring during meetings of the City Council pursuant to Senate Bill 707
Recommendation:
That the City Council adopt City Council Policy CP-26-01 approving the procedures for recessing and reconvening its meetings in the event of a disruption in telephonic or internet services during an open and public meeting.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Background:
On October 3, 2025, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill (SB) 707 into law. SB 707 added significant new requirements to the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Sections 54950—54963 (the “Brown Act”), to encourage and accommodate public participation at meetings.
A specific subset of these new Brown Act requirements that become effective on July 1, 2026, apply only to meetings of an “Eligible Legislative Body” as defined in Brown Act Section 54953.4(e)(2). An Eligible Legislative Body (“ELB”) is any of the following:
(A) A city council of a city with a population of 30,000 or more. (B) A county board of supervisors of a county with a population of 30,000 or more.
(C) A city council of a city located in a county with a population of 600,000 or more.
(D) The board of directors of a special district that has an internet website and meets certain other boundary/size/employment/revenue requirements. 2 3
8 0
Based on the above definitions, only the Victorville City Council (“City Council”) qualifies as an ELB. However, given that all City Council meetings also include those of the various bodies for which the City Council sits ex officio as the governing board, to the extent that this practice continues, the meetings of those non-ELBs will also be affected by the Brown Act changes described below.
Effective July 1, 2026, and subject to certain exceptions, Brown Act Section 54953.4(b)(1) requires that in addition to all other open meeting requirements of the Brown Act, public meetings of ELBs must:
(A) Provide for remote attendance by members of the public (either via a two-way telephonic service or a two-way audiovisual platform) “except if adequate telephonic or internet service is not operational at the meeting location.”
(B) If adequate telephonic or internet service is operational at the meeting location during only a portion of the meeting, allow for public attendance (either via a two-way telephonic service or a two-way audiovisual platform) during that portion of the meeting.
(C) Provide remote public meeting participants with the opportunity to provide public comment via the two-way telephonic service or a two-way audiovisual platform, giving them the same time allotment as those making in-person comments.
In addition, on or before July 1, 2026, ELBs must approve at a noticed public meeting in open session, and not on the consent calendar, a policy regarding disruption of telephonic or internet service occurring during meetings subject to the above requirements. The policy must address the procedures for recessing and reconvening a meeting in the event of disruption and the efforts the ELB shall make to attempt to restore the service. The policy must further contain certain disruption guidelines, which require the ELB to:
(A) Take a recess and try in good faith to restore service for at least one hour; and
(B) If service cannot be restored within one hour, and in order to proceed with the meeting, upon reconvening, conduct a roll call vote confirming that:
(1) Good faith efforts were made in accordance with the adopted policy to restore service; and
(2) The public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the interest in remote public access.
Discussion:
City Council Policy CP-26-01 provides the framework to address the procedures for recessing and reconvening a City Council meeting should a disruption of telephonic or internet service during meetings occur and the good faith efforts that City Staff will make to attempt to restore service. Furthermore, the policy includes the process for reconvening 2 3
8 0
the meeting if telephonic or internet service is unable to be restored in compliance with the provisions outlined in Brown Act Section 54953.4(b)(1).
Staff remains available for any or comments you might have.
Attachments: A. City Council Policy CP-26-01
ATTACHMENT A
CITY COUNCIL
POLICY
CP-26-01
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT:
Disruption of Telephonic or
Internet Services Occurring
During City Council Meetings
POLICY NO: CP-26-01
SUPERSEDES: N/A DATE: May 19, 2026
I. Purpose
This policy establishes guidelines for recessing and reconvening public meetings of the Victorville City Council in the event of a Service Disruption that prevents members of the public from attending or observing such meetings via Remote Access Service pursuant to Section 54953.4 of the Brown Act (Gov. Code §§ 54954- 54963) as added by Senate Bill (SB) 707.
II. Definitions
“Service Disruption” means any failure, outage, or other interruption to the City’s Remote Access Service that prevents members of the public from participating in a City Council meeting through such Remote Access Service.
“Remote Access Service” means the Two-way Telephonic Service and/or the Two- way Audiovisual Platform used by the City to provide real -time remote public attendance and observation of meetings.
“Two-way Audiovisual Platform” means an online platform that provides participants with the ability to participate in a meeting via both an interactive video conference and a two-way telephonic service.
“Two-way Telephonic Service” means a telephone service that does not require internet access and allows participants to dial a telephone number to listen and verbally participate.
“Presiding Officer” means the Mayor or the Mayor Pro Tem or such other officer as may be designated pursuant to the City Council Policy and Procedures Manual.
III. Applicability
This policy applies to all open and public meetings held by the Victorville City Council (“City Council”) at which remote public participation is required under Section 54953.4 of the Brown Act.1 Consistent therewith, this policy shall not apply to any City Council meeting held to:
1. Attend a judicial or administrative proceeding to which the City is a party.
2. Inspect real or personal property, provided that the topic of the meeting is limited to items directly related to the real or personal property.
3. Meet with elected or appointed officials of the U nited States or the State of California, solely to discuss a legislative or regulatory issue affecting the City and over which the federal or state officials have jurisdiction.
4. Meet in or nearby a facility owned by the City, provided that the topic of the meeting is limited to items directly related to the facility.
5. Meet in an emergency situation pursuant to Brown Act Section 54956.5
IV. Service Disruption Response/Recess
When the City Council becomes aware of a Service Disruption, the City Clerk shall immediately announce the Service Disruption to the public. The Presiding Officer shall then call for a recess of the open session and may convene the City Council in an authorized closed session, consistent with the Brown Act. The recess shall last for at least one (1) hour or until service is restored (whichever comes first).
V. Good Faith Efforts to Restore Remote Access Service
During the recess, City Staff shall engage in good faith efforts to restore Remote Access Service. Good faith efforts consist of the following:
1. Verification by trained City Staff of the Outage
a. Confirm if it is local or widespread
b. Test multiple devices on the network
2. Inspect Physical Connection in the M ain Distribution Frame/Intermediate Distribution Frame
1The City Council is the only legislative body in the City of Victorville meeting the new statutory definition of an Eligible Legislative Body (“ ELB”) set out in Brown Act Section 5495 3.4(e)(2). Although not statutorily required, the ELB meeting requirements will, as a practical matter, apply also to those bodies for which the members of the City Council sit ex officio as the governing boards (e.g., the Victorville Water District, the Southern California Logistics Airport Authority, the Victorville Library Board of Trustees, etc.) but only to the extent the meetings of the City Council and those boards continue to be conducted simultaneously. a. Confirm cables (ethernet, fiber and power) are securely connected b. Confirm all equipment is powered on
c. Inspect for visible damage to cables or equipment
3. Restart Network Equipment
a. Power cycle the equipment
b. Wait 30-60 seconds
c. Power the equipment back on
4. Check Internet Service Provider (ISP) Status
a. Visit the ISP outage page
b. Contact the local ISP for confirmation and the estimated restoration time
5. Run Network Diagnostics
a. Ping a known site
b. Confirm devices are receiving valid IP addresses
6. Check for Firewall or Security Blocks
a. Confirm the firewall isn’t blocking any traffic
7. Implement Temporary Alternatives
a. Utilize a mobile hotspot
b. Confirm the status of the failover connection
VI. Reconvening/Continuation Findings
Following one hour of engaging in good faith restoration efforts, if Remote Access Service has not been restored, the City Clerk shall report on the status of staff’s restoration efforts, and the City Council may reconvene to:
1. Adjourn the meeting;
2. Extend the recess to allow staff more time to engage in good faith efforts to restore Remote Access Service; or
3. Proceed with the open session portion of the meeting by adopting, by roll call vote, the following continuation findings:
a. That the City engaged in good faith efforts in accordance with the provisions of Policy CP-26-01 to restore Remote Access Service; and b. That the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in providing Remote Access Service.
Upon adoption of the findings, the City Council may continue the open session portion of the meeting even though Remote Access Service has not been restored.
The City Clerk shall enter a brief statement into the meeting minutes, including:
1. The nature and time of the Service Disruption;
2. The time the meeting was reconvened (if applicable);
3. Any continuation findings adopted.
VII. Policy Amendments
The City Council may amend this policy at a noticed public meeting in open session, but not as a consent calendar item.
Item Number: 9
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: May 19, 2026
Submitted By:
Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water
Subject:
Consultant/Professional Services Agreement with Besst, Inc. for Hydrogeological Services for Well 109
Recommendation:
That the Honorable Victorville Water District Board of Directors (Board):
(1) Find that Besst, Inc. is the sole provider for Well Profiling and Modification (Hydrogeological Services) and a sole source is approved in accordance with VMC
2.28.100(b)(2); and
(2) Approve the Consultant/Professional Services Agreement with Besst, Inc., Project CFC26-127.
Fiscal Impact:
Acting in accordance with the staff recommendation will result in a fiscal impact of $142,523.75. No additional appropriation is required. Funds have been budgeted in the following account code as part of the FY25/26 annual budget.
Account Description Account Code Available Balance
New Well Drill (Replace
Well 109)
4100500 – 55040 – 74520 $2,400,000
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Goal E, Invest in Infrastructure. By proactively planning for the replacement of Well 109 with a new well site, the Victorville Water District (District) can continue to provide a healthy and livable community for all residents.
Background:
Well 109, originally constructed in 1950, was the oldest active well in the District’s system and had been in continuous service for several decades. Due to its age, the well has 4 6
8 9
exceeded its service life and is subject to increased risk of structural and operational issues associated with aging infrastructure.
During a previous rehabilitation effort, it was determined that Well 109 had been constructed with mild steel casing that had significantly deteriorated over time due to corrosion. Because of the extent of the deterioration, typical rehabilitation methods were limited, and the contractor advised that the well could remain in service only for a limited period. The District monitored the well during this time; however, the advanced corrosion ultimately led to a structural failure several years later.
Despite the loss of Well 109, the District maintained sufficient production capacity to ensure uninterrupted water treatment and delivery to customers. The experience demonstrates the ongoing challenges associated with aging groundwater infrastructure and reinforces the importance of continued, proactive capital investment to maintain system reliability and long-term production capacity.
As part of the FY 24/25 budget cycle, the Board approved $2.4 million to re-drill Well 109.
Given the cost and long-term importance of groundwater infrastructure, District staff initiated the process to identify the most advantageous location for the replacement well.
Selecting a well site requires highly specialized evaluation, including hydrogeology, water quality, engineering, regulatory review, environmental compliance, and long-term system planning.
Hydrogeologic analysis is essential for determining groundwater availability, aquifer depth, hydraulic conductivity, and avoiding shallow groundwater zones that may be susceptible to contamination. Water quality considerations are equally critical, as the District must ensure that naturally occurring constituents can be effectively treated and that the proposed site is not influenced by surrounding contamination sources such as septic systems or industrial activities. This work is fundamental to ensuring compliance with California Drinking Water Standards and to safeguarding the District’s long-term water supply.
While District staff possess strong technical knowledge and operational experience, the complexity of evaluating a new production well site requires specialized expertise beyond what is available in-house. Engaging a qualified hydrogeology firm provides the District with advanced modeling, field investigation capabilities, regulatory insight, and technical rigor that are essential to the success of the project. For these reasons, the District sought a professional firm that specialized in well profiling and modification.
Discussion:
After site selection, the first step in re-drilling a well involves conducting temporary exploratory drilling to collect detailed information about subsurface conditions before designing a permanent production well. This preliminary drilling provides critical data about underground geology and groundwater behavior, which guides the design of a well that is safe, reliable, and efficient.
4 6
8 9
The work begins with preparation of technical specifications outlining the anticipated well design, materials, and construction methods. A pre-design approach is used, incorporating information from nearby wells to establish an initial design before drilling starts. As the project progresses, field data such as drill cuttings and downhole geophysical measurements are analyzed to confirm or refine the well design prior to installation of permanent components.
During drilling, full-time onsite observation is required to ensure proper construction practices and accurate documentation of underground conditions. This includes logging drill cuttings to characterize geologic layers and overseeing geophysical surveys that provide deeper insight into subsurface formations. Such oversight helps maintain borehole alignment, manage drilling fluids, and correctly identify the depth and characteristics of key geologic zones. These efforts are essential for proper placement of casing, well screen intervals, gravel pack, and bentonite seals. Quality assurance and quality control procedures are applied throughout drilling to verify that the information collected is accurate and reliable.
Oversight continues during well construction and development through periodic inspections. These include observing the installation of casing, well screens, gravel pack, and seals, and confirming that well development meets turbidity standards and other project criteria.
Once the test well is completed, groundwater samples are collected from various depths to evaluate water quality. Groundwater quality can vary significantly within the aquifer system, making these samples essential for determining which zones are most suitable for long-term production. For example, former Well 109 detected arsenic below regulatory limits, underscoring the importance of understanding how water quality changes with depth. These findings help ensure that the new production well targets the most favorable groundwater zones.
Hydrogeologic services encompass the scientific evaluation of groundwater systems, including how water moves underground, the geological materials it flows through, and how water quality varies by depth. In this project, these services are crucial for interpreting drilling data, geological samples, and water quality results from the test well. The evaluation includes key constituents such as arsenic, hexavalent chromium, iron, manganese, and total dissolved solids, information that helps identify changes in subsurface conditions and supports interpretation of groundwater flow and quality profiles.
After field activities are complete, the site will be demobilized, and final surface improvements, including a concrete pad and temporary seal, will be installed pending installation of the final equipment. All data collected throughout the project will be compiled and analyzed, and a final report will be prepared summarizing construction details, subsurface conditions, and water quality results. This report will also provide recommendations for the design of a permanent production well and will be certified by a California-licensed Professional Geologist.
4 6
8 9
Overall, this phase of the project is designed to give the District a comprehensive understanding of subsurface conditions before investing in a permanent production well.
This level of analysis reduces uncertainty, improves design decisions, and supports the development of a reliable and sustainable groundwater supply. While District staff have strong operational expertise, specialized hydrogeologic knowledge is required to perform and interpret complex field investigations, geologic analyses, and water quality evaluations that inform well design. The contemplated hydrogeological firm provides this advanced technical capability, bringing licensed professional geologists and groundwater specialists with extensive experience in subsurface characterization, geophysical logging, and aquifer evaluation, particularly within the District’s groundwater basin. Their expertise ensures that field data is accurately interpreted, well design decisions are scientifically sound, and all regulatory and industry standards are met.
In addition, BESST Inc. has been identified through the District’s sole-source process as the only firm capable of providing the unique performance features and specialized methods necessary for this phase of work. The Sole Source documentation (Attachment B) confirms that their proprietary techniques and qualifications are not available from other vendors, and that their capabilities align with the District’s technical standards and requirements. Engaging this firm ensures continuity, accuracy, and high-quality technical support throughout the test-well and design-refinement process. For these reasons, securing this qualified hydrogeology firm is essential to the successful completion of this phase of the project and to protecting the District’s long-term investment in this critical infrastructure.
In accordance with Victorville Municipal Code Section 2.28.100(b)(2) and seeing as the only technology out there to determine the exact depth to be drilled safely is owned by Besst, Inc., staff is requesting that the Board deem this project a sole source based on the specialized nature of the equipment.
Therefore, staff recommends that the Board approve the sole source designation for this project and authorize the Consultant/Professional Services Agreement with Besst, Inc. for Project CFC26-127, Well 109A Drilling and Profiling, in an amount not to exceed $142,523.75.
Staff is available for any questions the Board may have.
Prepared By:
Alejandra Garcia, Management Technician
Mel Krejckant, Public Works & Water Administrative Manager Attachments: A. Consultant-Professional Services Provider Agreement B. Sole Source
C. Vicinity Map
Attachment A
Consultant-Professional
Services Provider Agreement
CIP# 74520
1 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
CONSULTANT/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROVIDER AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT
AND
BESST, INC.
FOR
WELL 109A DRILLING AND PROFILING, PROJECT CFC26-127
THIS CONSULTANT/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROVIDER AGREEMENT (hereinafter “Agreement”), dated this __________________ day of ______________, 20___, for reference purpose only, is made and entered into by and between the VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT , a County water district and subsidiary district of the City of Victorville, organized and existing in the County of San Bernardino under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as the “District”, and Besst, Inc., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as “ Consultant.” District and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the District requires Consultant/Professional Services for Well 109A Drilling and Profiling; and
WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it is fully qualified to perform the consulting and/or professional services required for performance under this Agreement by virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and its employees; and
WHEREAS, in light of the facts set forth above, the District desires to retain the services of a qualified Consultant to provide, on an independent contractor basis, Well 109A Drilling and Profiling; and
NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND
PROMISES CONTAINED HEREIN AND FOR SUCH OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE
CONSIDERATION, RECEIPT OF WHICH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. RECITALS
The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this Agreement by this reference, as though set forth fully herein.
Section 2. PROPOSAL
Consultant shall provide to the District those services set forth in the Proposal , attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated as part of this Agreement by this reference.
CIP# 74520
2 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
Section 3. COMPENSATION
The District shall pay to Consultant a sum not to exceed One Hu ndred Forty Two Thousand Five Hundred Twenty Three and 75/100 D ollars ($142,523.75) for faithful performance of the services to be rendered under this Agreement, subject to the Bid Quotation Sheet provisions of Section 4, below. No expense reimbursements, including, but not limited to, reimbursements for travel, parking, lodging, and/or meals shall be paid to Consultant unless such expense reimbursements: (i) are specifically provided for and described by nature and type in Exhibit “B”, below; (ii) appear on Consultant ’s monthly invoices to District ; (iii) are supported by the appropriate receipts and other such documentation as the District shall require; and (iv) are directly related to the Scope of Services to be performed under this Agreement. In addition, any and all reimbursements shall be made in accordance with any District policy governing same.
Section 4. BID QUOTATION SHEET
The District shall pay Consultant as provided in the Bid Quotation Sheet, attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, and incorporated as part of this Agreement by this reference. The provisions of Exhibit “B” notwithstanding, in order to receive payments, Consultant shall be required to submit to the District detailed monthly invoices which include, if applicable, a description of all services/tasks performed, the number of hours expended on each service/task, the name of the person performing the service/task, and expense reimbursement information, if any, as required by Section 3, above. Provided that services have been satisfactorily rendered, invoices shall be paid by the District approximately thirty (30) working days following receipt of Consultant ’s invoice.
Section 5. RESERVED
Section 6. TERM OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall be for an Initial Term of one (1) year commencing on the date of full execution of the Agreement (the “Commencement Date”) and expiring on June 30, 2027 (the “Termination Date ”) (the “Term”) , unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 21 of this Agreement. From and after the Termination Date, and upon subsequent agreement by the Parties, this Agreement may continue on a month- to-month basis until terminated pursuant to Section 21 below.
This Agreement may be extended for one (1) additional one-year periods (hereinafter “Option Periods”), at the option of the District, subject to satisfactory performance as determined by the District. District shall give Service Provider sixty (60) days advance written notice prior to the expiration of the initial Term and sixty (60) days advance written notice prior to the expiration date of each subsequently exercised Option Period, if any, should the District decide to exercise its option(s) to extend. In the event District does not give Consultant such written notice of its option to extend, this Agreement shall terminate at the end of the then -current Term or Option Period without further notice from either Party, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions of Section 21 below. Should the District fail to give Consultant the sixty (60) days written notice of its intention to exercise any Option Period, the District may, in its sole CIP# 74520
3 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
discretion, elect to exercise any Option Period at a later date, following written inquiry from Consultant.
Section 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS
It is the express intention of the Parties that Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee, agent, joint venturer, or partner of the District. Nothing in this agreement shall be interpreted or construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer and employee between the District and Consultant or any employee or agent of Consultant . Both Parties acknowledge that Consultant is not an employee for state or federal tax purposes or any other purpose. Consultant shall retain the right to perform services for others during the term of this agreement.
Section 8. REPRESENTATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REGARDING INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR’S STATUS OF
CONSULTANT
a. Consultant represents and acknowledges the following:
(1) The District is not required to provide any training or legal counsel to Consultant or its employees in order for Consultant to perform the services described in this Agreement.
(2) Performance of the services described in this Agreement does not have to be integrated into the daily business operations of the District.
(3) The services described in this Agreement can be performed without the use of District equipment, materials, tools, or facilities, unless otherwise provided under a separate agreement.
(4) Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to imply that the District must maintain any contractual relationship with Consultant on a continuing basis after termination of this Agreement.
(5) The District will not be requested or demanded to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wage, or other such compensation to any person employed by Consultant to perform the services described in this Agreement.
(6) Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are employees of the District.
b. The District represents and acknowledges the following:
(1) Consultant is solely responsible for determining who, under the supervision or direction of Consultant, will perform the services set forth in this Agreement.
(2) The District will not hire, supervise, or pay any employees or assistants working for Consultant pursuant to this Agreement.
CIP# 74520
4 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
(3) Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to imply that Consultant must maintain any contractual relationship with the District on a continuing basis after termination of this Agreement.
(4) It is the sole responsibility of Consultant to set the hours in which Consultant performs or plans to perform the services set forth in this Agreement.
(5) Consultant is not required to devote full time to the business operations of the District in order to perform the services set forth in this Agreement.
(6) Unless deemed necessary under certain circumstances, Consultant is not required to perform the services set forth in this Agreement at City Hall or on District -owned property.
(7) Other than attendance at required public meetings and public hearings, and complying with the provisions of the Bid Quotation Sheet set forth in Exhibit B and any procedural requirements set forth by law, Consultant is not required to perform the services set forth in this Agreement in any particular order or sequence.
(8) Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to preclude Consultant from working for other persons or firms, provided that such work does not create a conflict of interest.
Section 9. NOT AGENT OF THE DISTRICT
a. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed, construed, or represented by the District or Consultant or by any third person to create the relationship of principal and agent.
b. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of the District in any capacity whatsoever as an agent, nor shall Consultant have any authority, express or implied, to bind the District to any obligation whatsoever.
Section 10. LICENSES AND PERMITS
Consultant represents that it has obtained and will maintain at all times during the I nitial Term (and during the Option Period, if applicable) of this Agreement all business licenses, including but not limited to a City of Victorville business license, professional licenses or certifications, or permits necessary for performing the services described in this Agreement.
Section 11. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE; WARRANTY
a. Consultant agrees to perform all services required by this Agreement in a professional and competent manner, in accordance with the degree of skill and diligence which is normally employed by reputable professionals performing similar services under similar conditions in the same or similar locality. Such services shall also be performed in a manner which is reasonably satisfactory to Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water , or his designee.
CIP# 74520
5 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
b. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that it:
(1) Has thoroughly investigated and considered the services and work to be performed;
(2) Has investigated the issues regarding the scope of services to be provided;
(3) Has carefully considered how the services and related work should be performed; and
(4) Fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions associated with performance of the services required by this Agreement.
Section 12. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK
Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the services or as represented by the District , Consultant shall immediately inform the District of such fact and shall not provide any services, except at Consultant's risk, until written instructions are received from Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water, or his designee.
Section 13. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Consultant covenants that it does not have any interest, nor shall it acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of Consultant’s services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of services under this Agreement, no officer, employee or agent of Consultant having such interest shall be employed by it. In the event the District determines that Consultant must disclose its financial interests by completing and filing a Fair Political Practices Commission Form 700, Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant shall file such Form 700 with the District Secretary’s Office pursuant to the written instructions provided by the District Secretary.
Acquisition or maintenance of a conflicting interest by Consultant may result in termination of this Agreement by the District.
Section 14. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
Consultant shall comply with all local, state, and federal laws and regulations applicable to the services to be rendered hereunder, including any rule, regulation, or bylaw governing the conduct or performance of Consultant or its employees, officers, or board members.
Section 15. COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
INSURANCE
a. Consultant shall procure and maintain at its own expense, during the I nitial Term of this Agreement (and during the Option Period, if applicable) , Commercial General Liability Insurance, of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, death, loss, or damage CIP# 74520
6 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
resulting from the wrongful or negligent acts by Consultant or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents and independent contractors.
b. Consultant shall further procure and maintain, at its own expense, during the Initial Term of this Agreement, (and during the Option Period, if applicable), Commercial Vehicle Liability Insurance covering personal injury and property damage, of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit, covering any vehicle utilized by Consultant or its officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors in performing the services required by this Agreement.
Section 16. WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
a. Consultant shall procure and maintain at its own expense, during the I nitial Term of this Agreement (and during the Option Period, if applicable), Workers' Compensation Insurance, providing coverage as required by the California State Workers' Compensation Law.
b. If any class of employees employed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement is not protected by the California State Workers' Compensation Law, Consultant shall provide adequate insurance for the protection of such employees to the satisfaction of the District.
Section 17. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
Professional Liability Insurance or Errors and Omissions insurance as appropriate to Consultant’s profession shall be required and written on a policy form specifically designed to provide coverage for and protect against the negligent acts, errors and omissions of the Consultant in the performance of the services required by this Agreement. A minimum limit of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate must be provided.
Section 18. ADDITIONAL INSURED
Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any required insurance policies or any subsequent endorsements attached thereto, all insurance policies, except for the Workers' Compensation, shall be endorsed to name the District , the City of Victorville, their officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents and independent contractors, including, without limitation, the District Legal Counsel, as Additional Insureds.
Section 19. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION RIGHTS
Consultant shall require the carriers of all required insurance policies , to waive all rights of subrogation against the District, the City of Victorville, and their officers, employees, servants, volunteers, agents, and independent contractors and subcontractors. Each policy of insurance shall be endorsed to reflect such waiver.
Section 20. PROOF OF INSURANCE COVERAGE; REQUIRED
ENDORSEMENTS
a. Consultant shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies authorized to transact insurance business in the State of California, the policies of insurance CIP# 74520
7 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
required by this Agreement and furnish to the Clerk certificates of insurance evidencing the required coverage, and policy endorsements at least two (2) weeks prior to the commencement of any services to be performed under this Agreement.
b. The policies and certificates of insurance shall be endorsed to provide that in the event of cancellation or amendment of any required insurance policy for any reason whatsoever, the District shall be notified by mail, postage prepaid, not less than thirty (30) days before the cancellation or amendment is effective. In the case of cancellation for non -payment, ten (10) days advance written notice shall be given.
c. Each policy and certificate of insurance shall be endorsed to provide that the policy shall not be terminated or expire without first providing thirty (30) days written notice to the District of such termination or expiration.
d. Each policy and certificate of insurance shall be endorsed to provide that the policy will be maintained throughout the Initial Term (and during the Option Period, if applicable), of this Agreement.
e. The commercial general liability and vehicle liability policies shall be endorsed to contain the following provision: “For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non- contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the District, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the District, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies.”
Section 21. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION
a. This Agreement may be terminated or suspended without cause by either Party at any time, provided that the Party initiating the termination provides the other Party at least thirty (30) days advance written notice of such termination or suspension. In the event of such termination, the District shall only be liable for payment under the payment provisions of this Agreement for satisfactory services rendered or supplies actually furnished prior to the effective date of termination.
b. This Agreement may be terminated or suspended with cause by either Party at any time, provided that the Party initiating termination provides the other Party at least ten (10) days advance written notice of s uch termination or suspension. In the event of such termination, the District shall only be liable for payment under the payment provisions of this Agreement for satisfactory services rendered or supplies actually furnished prior to the effective date of termination.
Section 22. TIME OF THE ESSENCE
Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.
CIP# 74520
8 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
Section 23. INDEMNIFICATION
a. Except as set forth in Subsection b of this Section 23, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall immediately defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the District, its officers, employees, representatives, and agents (the “District Indemnitees”), from and against those actions, suits, proceedings, claims, demands, losses, costs, and expenses, including legal costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, for any personal injuries, deaths, or property damage, including property owned by the District (collectively “Claims”) which may arise out of Consultant's negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of the services described in this Agreement, unless such Claims are proven to be caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the District Indemnitees.
b. The provisions of this Subsection b apply only in the event that Consultant is a design professional within the meaning of California Civil Code section 2782.8 (“Design Professional”). The term Design Professional, as defined in said section, is limited to licensed architects, licensed landscape architects, registered professional engineers, professional land surveyors, and the business entities that offer such services in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California Business and Professions Code.
(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection a above, to the extent that the services to be provided under this Agreement are those of a Design Professional, Consultant's duty to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the District Indemnitees shall be limited to the extent that any Claims arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or subconsultants in the performance of the services described in this Agreement.
(2) In no event shall the costs of defense charged to Consultant exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault, except as otherwise set forth in said Civil Code section 2782.8, the provisions of which are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference.
Nothing in this Subsection b shall be construed to require Consultant to provide indemnification for Claims caused by the active negligence or willful misconduct of the District Indemnitees.
c. The District does not and shall not waive any rights that it may have against Consultant under this Section, because of the acceptance by the District, or the deposit with the District, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. The hold harmless and indemnification provisions of this Section 23 shall apply regardless of whether said insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost, or expense described herein.
d. The obligation to indemnify and defend, as set forth in this Section 23, is binding on the successors, assigns, or heirs of Consultant and shall survive the expiration or any early termination of this Agreement.
Section 24. REPORTS
Upon request by Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water , or his designee, or as otherwise required by this Agreement, including but not limited to, the Scope of CIP# 74520
9 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
Services set forth in Exhibit “A”, Consultant shall prepare and submit reports to the District concerning Consultant's performance of the services required by this Agreement.
Section 25. RECORDS
a. Consultant shall keep such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water, or his designee, to evaluate the cost and the performance of such services.
b. Books and records pertaining to costs shall be kept and prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
c. Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water , or h is designee, shall have full and free access to such books and records at all reasonable times, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such records.
d. Records and supporting documents pertaining to the use of funds paid to Consultant hereunder shall be retained by Consultant and made available to Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water, or his designee, for purposes of performing an audit for a period of five (5) years from the date of termination of this Agreement.
Section 26. RESERVED
Section 27. CONFIDENTIALITY; OWNERSHIP OF WORK
a. Any and all documents and information obtained from the District or prepared by Consultant for the District shall be kept strictly confidential unless otherwise provided by applicable law. All District data, documents and information shall be returned to the District upon termination of the Agreement.
b. Any drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents, or other materials prepared by Consultant in the performance of services under this Agreement shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of to Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water, or his designee, or as required by applicable law.
c. Consultant shall not disclose to any other entity or person any information regarding the activities of the District , except with the prior written approval of Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water, or his designee, or as required by applicable law.
d. All original documents, reports, designs, computer files and all other materials prepared by Consultant in the course of performing the services pursuant to this Agreement, whether completed or in progress, are the property of the District and shall be surrendered to the District upon the completion of Consultant’s services or when requested by Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water, or his designee. Such materials may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the District without the permission of Consultant.
e. Consultant’s covenants under this Section 27 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
CIP# 74520
10 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
Section 28. PRINCIPAL REPRESENTATIVES
a. Stefan McLin, Project Manager, is designated as the principal representative of Consultant for purposes of communicating with the District on any matter associated with the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement.
b. Doug Mathews, Director of Public Works and Water, or his designee, shall be the principal representative of the District for purposes of communicating with Consultant on any matter associated with the performance of the services set forth in this Agreement.
c. Either Party may designate another individual as its principal representative by giving written notice of such designation to the other Party.
Section 29. MODIFICATIONS AND AMENDMENTS; EXTRA SERVICES
a. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written instrument signed by both Parties.
b. During the Initial Term, the District may request that the Consultant perform Extra Services. As used herein, "Extra Services" means any services, which are determined by the District to be necessary for the proper completion of Well 109A Drilling and Profiling but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. A written instrument signed by both Parties shall be required to authorize performance of and payment for Extra Services.
Section 30. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a. This Agreement supersedes any and all prior or contemporaneous agreements, either oral or written, between the District and Consultant with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.
b. This Agreement contains all of the covenants and agreements between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and each Party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any Party, except those covenants and agreements in this Agreement.
c. No agreement, statement, or promise with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, which is not contained in this Agreement, or in a valid modification or amendment to this Agreement, shall be valid or binding on either Party.
Section 31. AMBIGUITIES
This Agreement is in all respects intended by each Party hereto to be deemed and construed to have been jointly prepared by the Parties and the Parties hereby expressly agree that any uncertainty or ambiguity existing herein shall not be interpreted against either of them.
Except as expressly limited by this paragraph, all of the applicable rules of interpretation of contract shall govern the interpretation of any uncertainty or ambiguity of this Agreement.
CIP# 74520
11 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties agree that Exhibits “A” and “B” are attached hereto for reference purposes and to the extent there are any ambiguities, inconsistencies or conflicts between the terms of this Consultant/Professional Services Standard Provider Agreement and Exhibit s “A” and “B” the terms of this Consultant/Professional Services Standard Provider Agreement shall control and nothing set forth in Exhibit s “A” and “B” shall be deemed to supersede any of the provisions of this Consultant/Professional Services Standard Provider Agreement.
Section 32. NOTICES
a. Any notice to be provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing, and all such notices shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the Parties as follows:
To the District: Doug Mathews,
Director of Public Works and Water
Public Works Department
City of Victorville
14343 Civic Drive
Victorville, CA 92392
To Consultant: Noah Heller, MS PG (CA 5792)
CEO – President / Senior Hydrogeologist
Besst, Inc.
50 Tiburon, Suite 7
San Rafael, CA 94901
b. Notices, payments, and other documents shall be deemed delivered upon receipt by personal service or as of the second (2nd) day after deposit in the United States mail.
Section 33. NON-LIABILITY OF DISTRICT OFFICERS AND
EMPLOYEES
No officer or employee of the District shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the District or for any amount, which may become due to Consultant or to its successor(s), or for any breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.
Section 34. REVIEW BY ATTORNEYS
Each Party hereto has had its attorney(s) review this Agreement and all related documents. Each Party hereto has consulted with its attorney(s) and has negotiated the terms of this Agreement based on such consultation.
CIP# 74520
12 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
Section 35. WAIVER
a. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the Party making the waiver.
b. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision.
c. Failure of either Party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of such provision or any of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.
Section 36. ASSIGNMENT
This Agreement shall not be assigned by either Party without prior written consent of the other Party.
Section 37. CARE OF WORK
The performance of services by Consultant or the payment of money by the District shall not relieve Consultant from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work at no further cost to the District, when such incomplete, inaccurate or defective work is due to the negligence of Consultant.
Section 38. CAPTIONS AND HEADINGS
The captions and headings contained in this Agreement are provided for identification purposes only and shall not be interpreted to limit or define the content of the provisions described under the respective caption or heading.
Section 39. SUCCESSORS, HEIRS, AND ASSIGNS
Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this Agreement shall be binding upon the successors, endorsees, assigns, heirs, and personal representatives of each of the Parties to this Agreement and, likewise, shall inure to the benefit of the successors, endorsees, assigns, heirs, and personal representatives of each of the Parties.
Section 40. GENDER
In this Agreement, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the masculine, feminine and neuter genders and the singular and the plural shall include one another.
Section 41. SEVERABILITY
If any one or more of the sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained herein is declared invalid, void, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be CIP# 74520
13 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
deemed severable from the remainder of this Agreement and shall not affect, impair, or invalidate any of the remaining sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained herein.
Section 42. GOVERNING LAW
The validity of this Agreement and any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the Parties under this Agreement, shall be construed pursuant to and in accordance with California law.
Section 43. DEFAULT
a. Failure or delay by any Party to this Agreement to perform any material term or provision of this Agreement shall constitute a default under this Agreement; provided however, that if the Party who is otherwise claimed to be in default by the other Party commences to cure, correct, or remedy the alleged default within fifteen (15) days after receipt of written notice specifying such default and shall diligently complete such cure, correction, or remedy, such Party shall not be deemed to be in default hereunder.
b. The Party claiming that a default has occurred shall give written notice of default to the Party in default, specifying the alleged default. Delay in giving such notice shall not constitute a waiver of any default nor shall it change the time of default; provided, however, the injured Party shall have no right to exercise any remedy for a default hereunder without delivering the written default notice, as specified herein.
c. Any failure or delay by a Party in asserting any of its rights or remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any rights or remedies associated with a default.
d. In the event that a default by any Party to this Agreement may remain uncured for more than fifteen (15) days following written notice, as provided above, the injured Party shall be entitled to seek any appropriate remedy or damages by initiating legal proceedings.
Section 44. CUMULATIVE REMEDIES
Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default of any other default by the other Party.
Section 45. VENUE
All proceedings involving disputes over the terms, provisions, covenants, or conditions contained in this Agreement and all proceedings involving any enforcement action related to this Agreement shall be initiated and conducted in the applicable court or forum in San Bernardino County, California.
CIP# 74520
14 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
Section 46. ATTORNEYS’ FEES
In the event any action, suit, or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement, or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such suit or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, from the losing Party, and any judgment or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof.
Section 47. EFFECTIVENESS OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall not be binding upon the District, until signed by the authorized representative(s) of Consultant, approved by the District ’s Risk Manager, and executed by the authorized District personnel or Mayor.
Section 48. REPRESENTATIONS OF PARTIES AND PERSONS
EXECUTING AGREEMENT
a. Each of the Parties to this Agreement hereby represents that all necessary and appropriate actions of their governing bodies have been taken to make this Agreement a binding obligation of each of the Parties hereto.
b. The persons executing this Agreement warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of and bind the Parties each purports to represent.
Section 49. COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed by the P arties in counterparts, and when executed by each of the Parties, each counterpart shall be deemed to be a part of this Agreement.
(END OF THIS PAGE)
CIP# 74520
15 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the dates written below.
VICTORVILLE WATER DISTRICT BESST, INC.
By:______________________________ By:__________________________ Elizabeth Becerra, Noah Heller, MS PG (CA 5792) Board Chairman CEO – President
Dated: ___________________________ Dated:_______________________
ATTEST:
By:_______________________________
Jennifer Thompson,
District Secretary
Dated:_____________________________
APPROVED AS TO STANDARD FORM:
By: _______________________________
Andre de Bortnowsky,
District Legal Counsel
Dated:________________________ _
By: _________________________ _
Sandra Bostick,
District Risk Manager
Dated:_______ _______________
CIP# 74520
16 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSAL
See Attachment
1 BESST, Inc., 50 Tiburon Street, #7, San Rafael, CA / 1380 Greg Street, #225, Sparks, NV / O: 415.453.2501 / www.besst-inc.com March 25th, 2026
To: Mr. Tom Porter
Water Supply Supervisor
Water Department
City of Victorville
O: 760.403.7071 / [email protected]
Cc: Arnold Villareal, Water Manager, 760.955.2993 [email protected] Cc: Daniel Best, Assistant Director of Water, 760.955.2482 [email protected] Subject: BESST Proposal for Hydrogeological Services – Long Screened Test Well From: Noah Heller, Principal Hydrogeologist, BESST, Inc.
Dear Mr. Porter:
BESST is pleased to provide you and your team members with our proposal for professional hydrogeological services to plan, oversee drilling and construction and to perform testing of a long-screened test well. Our quoted services include assistance and support in writing the technical specifications to be incorporated into the City’s Front Ends bid package that will be submitted to eligible drilling firms. BESST’s field services are abbreviated in part to save on cost and include logging of drill cuttings an supervision of downhole geophysics that are combined with oversight and QAQC of drilling activities during this time. Following this effort, BESST will only be on site to “spot-check” follow-on activities including well construction and development. Spot checks include observation of how the casing, well screen, gravel pack and bentonite seals are installed and that the well development meets the NTU criteria as stated in the driller’s contract.
The purpose of being onsite for the entirety of the drilling portion of the effort and the downhole geophysics is to ensure that the borehole is straight (alignment surveys), that there is no to minimal lost circulation and that cuttings are logged properly to ensure that the casing, screen intervals and bentonite seals are assigned to the correct depth intervals and that the downhole geophysical survey is properly run and produces useable data. Following development, BESST will use its proprietary profiling technology and methods (1US Patents) to profile the long-screened test well. We will coordinate with the City as to the number of sample bottle sets that will be required for the profiling effort. BESST staff will fill out the bottle labels and chain of custody and then transfer the bottles in coolers to the City’s representative for transport to the laboratory.1 We believe that a pre-design test well approach will work best for this project and will save the City money and time. The pre-design approach consists of BESST reviewing the driller’s logs from nearby wells and then using this data to formulate what the test well construction will be in the tech spec. This will allow the eligible drilling companies to establish pricing for these materials as part of their bid package. The drilling firm that receives the project award will then be required to order these materials in advance and stage them in a protective manner close to the drilling site. BESST’s review of the drill cuttings and the downhole geophysics will be performed as a QAQC check on the pre-design before the casing and annular materials are installed into the borehole to construct the test well. Given the statistical nature of how arsenic and hexavalent chromium are distributed in the subsurface, identification of aquitard boundaries and interbedded fines with more permeable sediments are of particular interest in the test well design and well profiling injection and sampling plan (ISP). Other analytes of concern that might be considered for sample analysis are 1 US 12,416,235, US 10,738,603 B2, US 10,677,626 B2
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSAL, PROJECT CFC26-127
17/ Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127 2 BESST, Inc., 50 Tiburon Street, #7, San Rafael, CA / 1380 Greg Street, #225, Sparks, NV / O: 415.453.2501 / www.besst-inc.com total and dissolved iron and manganese, both of which are sometimes associated with arsenic and hexavalent chromium. Total dissolved solids should also be tested for and will be useful in calibrating and performing a QAQC check on the flow profiling and mass balanced chemistry.
After the profiling is completed, BESST will demobilize from the site. The driller will likely stay behind to construct a concrete pad around the test well and to install bollards to protect it. BESST will then begin its review of the data, including water chemistry, sieve analysis results, further review of the cuttings and downhole geophysics as well as the driller’s logs and reporting to provide a report that will detail the well construction as well as the profiling flow and water chemistry results. The final report will be stamped with a Professional Geologist seal by one of our California licensed geologists and provide recommendations for the final design of a public supply well.
We look forward to working closely with you and your team and providing you with excellent service and results. Please feel free to reach out with any questions or thoughts.
Kind Regards,
Noah Heller, MS PG (CA 5792)
President, Principal Hydrogeologist
BESST, Inc.
M: 415,302.7354 / [email protected]
Stefan McLin, Hydrogeologist, Project Manager
BESST, Inc.
M: 702743.6339 / [email protected]
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSAL, PROJECT CFC26-127
18/ Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127 CIP# 74520
19 Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127
EXHIBIT B
B
ID QUOTATION SHEET
S
ee Attachment
Quotation Date: 3/24/2026
City of Victorville, California
Item Quantity Unit Price Total
50 hrs. 170.00$ 8,500.00$
15 hrs. 195.00$ 2,925.00$
7 hrs. 235.00$ 1,645.00$
1 trip 2,952.00$ 2,952.00$
16,022.00$
3 ea. $ 2,152.00 $ 6,456.00
7 day(s) $ 273.00 $ 1,911.00
7 day(s) $ 1,700.00 $ 11,900.00
12 hrs. $ 195.00 $ 2,340.00
15 ea. $ 188.25 $ 2,823.75
5 hrs. $ 195.00 $ 975.00
5 hrs. $ 235.00 $ 1,175.00
$ 27,580.75
1 ea. 3,416.00$ 3,416.00$
5 day(s) $ 546.00 2,730.00$
1 ea. 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$
5 day(s) 9,950.00$ 49,750.00$
15 hrs. 195.00$ 2,925.00$
5 hrs. 235.00$ 1,175.00$
62,496.00$
0 ft. $ 3.35 $ -
1 ea. $ 500.00 $ 500.00
1 ea. $ 250.00 $ 250.00
1 ea. $ 250.00 $ 250.00
$ 1,000.00
0 ea. $ 330.00 $ -
0 Liters $ 30.00 $ -
0 day(s) 1,700.00$ $ -
$ -
$ 91,076.75
Spot-Check Oversight: borehole drilling, lithology logging, geophysics, construction, and well development. Assume 7 days of spot-checking per 25 days of drilling per well location, 1000' borehole. Daytime work only, including weekends.
Attend on site pre-construction meeting, including travel and time costs Spot Oversight Mob/Demob
Per diem Hydrogeologist 1: food, lodging and fuel
Final Test Well Design: Analyze Geophysical Logs and Compare to Cuttings Full Sieve Analysis: includes 10% administrative markup on subcontracted services Senior Hydrogeologist Field Support
Subtask 2D: Optional Services
Extra Zones
Extra Volume
Complete Chain of Custody
Subtotal #2A
TASK 2 - TEST WELL SUPPORT SERVICES - ASSUME REVERSE ROTARY DRILLING
HYDROGEOLOGIC SERVICES
Payment Terms: Net 30
Victorville, CA 92392
Phone:760.955.2993
[email protected]
TASK 1 - TEST WELL TECH SPEC + PLANNING and MEETINGS
[email protected]
Office: 415.453.2501 / Direct: 805.729.2909
50 Tiburon, Suite 7 San Rafael, CA 94901
BESST INC
Quote Valid for 90 Days
Planning, Meetings - Senior Hydrogeologist / Project Manager Support and Assist in preparation of tech-specification and bid sheet.
Planning, Meetings - Principal Hydrogeologist - Project Executive MS PG BESST Preliminary Quotation: City of Victorville - Well 109A Test Well Hydrogeological Services (Spot Check
Approach)
CLIENT INFORMATION:
Mr. Arnold Villarreal, Water Manager
14343 Civic Dr
Estimators: Noah Heller, PG. Stefan McLin, Project Manager Task 1 Subtotal
Subtotal #2B
Subtotal #2C
Subtotal #2D
Task 2 Subtotal
PFAS Dedicated Tubing for Depth-Dependent Sampling
Complete Sample Bottle Labels
Step Test to Estimate Hydraulic Properties
Package Samples
Subtask 2B - Well Testing
Subtask 2A - Construction Support (Spot Checking Approach) Subtask 2C: Sample Handling and Coordination
Senior Hydrogeologist Field Support
Principal Hydrogeologist, MS PG Field Support
Mob/Demob - Includes Profiling Rig and Personnel
Profiling Rig setup
Operation: Dynamic Flow and Water Quality Profiling requires two scientists. Up to 20 Per diem Hydrogeologists 1 & 2: food, lodging and fuel
Principal Hydrogeologist, MS PG Field Support
1 of 2
EXHIBIT B
BID QUOTATION SHEET, PROJECT CFC26-127
20/ Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127 Quotation Date: 3/24/2026
City of Victorville, California
Item Quantity Unit Price Total
HYDROGEOLOGIC SERVICES
Payment Terms: Net 30
Victorville, CA 92392
Phone:760.955.2993
[email protected] [email protected]
Office: 415.453.2501 / Direct: 805.729.2909
50 Tiburon, Suite 7 San Rafael, CA 94901
BESST INC
Quote Valid for 90 Days
BESST Preliminary Quotation: City of Victorville - Well 109A Test Well Hydrogeological Services (Spot Check
Approach)
CLIENT INFORMATION:
Mr. Arnold Villarreal, Water Manager
14343 Civic Dr
Estimators: Noah Heller, PG. Stefan McLin, Project Manager 1 ea. $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00
1 ea. $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00
$ 32,000.00
1 wk. $ 200.00 $ 200.00
1 wk. $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
1 wk. $ 1,250.00 $ 1,250.00
1 wk. $ 350.00 $ 350.00
5 day(s) $ 125.00 $ 625.00
$ 3,425.00
0 day(s) $ 1,700.00 $ -
0 hr. $ 275.00 $ -
0 hr. $ 235.00 $ -
0 hr. $ 195.00 $ -
0 hr. $ 170.00 $ -
0 day(s) $ 7,960.00 $ -
0 ea. $ 2,903.60 $ -
0 ea. $ 2,152.00 $ -
0 day(s) $ 546.00 $ -
0 day(s) $ 273.00 $ -
$ -
$ 142,523.75
Task 5 Subtotal
Oversight Per Diem (1 Hydrogeologist)
Profiling Mob/Demob: 2 Hydrogeologist Crew Swap
Profiling Dynamic Profiling Operation - additional days Profiling Crew Per Diem (2 Hydrogeologists)
Oversight Mob/Demob: 1 Hydrogeologist
Client Purchase Order Number_____________________________________ Client Signature_________________________________ Test Well Completion Report with PG Signoff including recommendations for production well design.
TOTAL:
Senior Hydrogeologist Review and Support
Hydrogeologist Oversight, Well Construction Support
Task 3 Subtotal
Task 4 Subtotal
Standby
Principal Hydrogeologist Review and Support
Spot Check Oversight - additional days
TASK 5 - OVERRUN CONTINGENCY
TASK 3 - TEST WELL COMPLETION REPORT
TASK 4 - INSTRUMENTATION
Plot and Analyze lithology, geophysics, water chemistry and flow data, and sieve analysis for the public supply well design
Water Level Meter
Pressure Transducer + Non-Vented Cable
Multi Water Parameter Meter and Flowcell
Hach 2100Q Portable Turbidity meter
Generator Rental
2 of 2
EXHIBIT B
BID QUOTATION SHEET, PROJECT CFC26-127
21/ Consultant/Professional Services Provider Agreement/Besst, Inc./Project CFC26-127 Attachment B
Sole Source
SOLE SOURCE/BRAND REQUEST
When a request is made for a non-competitive purchase and the specifications limit the bidding to one source and/or one brand or trade name, the requesting department must complete the following:
VENDOR/COMPANY NAME: _______________________________________________________________
1. Please check one:
SOURCE: Item is available from one source only. Item is one-of-a kind and is exclusively sold through a regional authorized distributor or the manufacturer is the only distributor.
SOLE BRAND: Various sources can supply the specified model and brand, and competitive bids will be solicited for the requested brand only. Meets form, fit and function - nothing else will do.
STANDARDIZATION REQUEST: The City of Victorville ______________________ (Department name) Department requires the item(s) to standardize parts; design; quality; training; etc...
2. W
hat are the unique performance features of the product / brand requested that are not available in any other product / brand? (For services: What unique qualifications’, rights, licenses does this vendor possess?)
3. Why are the unique performance features REQUIRED (not merely preferred), and how would your requirement be inhibited without this service or item? N/A
4. If justification is based on matching and/or interdependent with existing equipment (refer to 1. Standardization Request), list the quantity, manufacturer, brand, and model of the existing equipment and why the matching is required.
I am aware of the City of Victorville’s policy for competitive bidding and the established criteria for sole source/sole brand purchasing. Therefore, I feel confident that this request for sole source/sole brand procurement meets the City of Victorville’s criteria and will withstand an audit or a vendor protest.
Requestor: ________________________________ ______________________________ ___________ (Print Name) (Signature) (Date)
Dept. Director: ____________________________ ______________________________ ___________ (Print Name) (Signature) (Date)
Finance Director: __________________________ ______________________________ ____________ (Print Name) (Signature) (Date)
Besst Inc.
Water
Arnold Villarreal
Doug Mathews
Carmen Cun
✔
Please see attached
Please see attached
Appendix E Continued
UNITED STATES PATENT ANO TRADEMARK OFFICE
Af>PUCAIION NO
171875,178.
James P. Broder
Roeder & Broder LLP
48$4 Edg.eware R<lad
San .Dieio, CA 92116
l'SSt:EDAlE
09/16002S
l .!•ilU:u St.\ re. 1)1:J'"IUMK'\f Of" ('OM�it:ilft;
l!lllilt!d Stllc6'1i l'llm:,1 11ml Tt.lldtm11rl o,r
Addl•" · t:0,.,1).USS!OXER.fllRJ'ATI�t'S
PJJ.U,.. l◄51i
Mnalria,. Vie,,,ni1 IDJJ U.!O
•'llfWIOpht,c,,.
PAIEi'\lNO. ATlOR...;EY LlOC�T NO. CONHRM.Jt. 110.:-.l NO. l1-tl62J5 2fll9
ISSUE NOTIF'ICATION
The. projected patent nwnbcr and issue date arc specified above. The patent will issue clcctronicaUy. The electronically issued palent is the official patent grant pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 153. The patent may be accessed on ,or after the issue date through Patent Center at hups;//patentcenter.uspto.gov/. The patent will be ,wailahle. in both the public and the private side-s of Patent Center. Further assistance in electronically accessing the patent, or about Patent Center. is available by calling the Patent Elcclronic Busines!- Center at l-888-2J.7n9l97.
The USPTO is implementing electronic patent is�uance with a transition period. during which period Ole USPTO wiU mail a ceremonial paper copy of the clcctroni.c patent. grant to lhc correspondence address- of record. Additional copies ofthe patent (i.e., certified and presentation copies) may be ordered for a fee from the USPTO's Ce_rtified Copy Center at htlps://cert.ifiedcopycentcr.uspto.gov/index.html. The Certified Copy Center may he reached at (800)972-6382.
Determination of Patent Term Adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154 (b) (application filed on or after May 29, 2000)
The Patent Tenn Adjustment is 492 day(s). Any patent to is.sue from the abovc�i<lenti.fied application will include an indication of the adjustment on the front page.
If a Continued Pmsecution Application (CPA) wa..'i filed in the ahovc-idenrified app1iculion, lht! filing date that determines Patent Term Adjuslmenl is the filing date of lhe most recent CPA.
Applicant will be able to obmin more detailed infonnation by accessing the Patent Center (https:// patentcentcr.uspto.gov ),
Any quciLions regarding the- Patent Term Extension or Adjm,Lmenl detem1ination should be directed Lo lhe Office of Patent Legal Admi11islratfon al (571 )-272-7702, Questions relating to issue and puhlkation fee payments should be direc.tcd t.o the Application Assistance Unit (AAU) of the Office of Pa.tents Stakeholder Experience (OPSE), Stakeholder Support Division (SSD) at (571)-272-4200.
26 BESST, Inc. >:t 50 Tiburon St, Ste. 7 >:t San Rafael, CA 94901 >:t (P) 415/453.2501 >:t (F) 415/453.2509 >:t WWW.BESST-INC.COM Attachment C
Vicinity Map
Item Number: 10
City Council / Board of Directors
Written Communications
Meeting of: May 19, 2026
Submitted By:
Keith C. Metzler, City Manager
Subject:
Law Enforcement Contract #94-909-A-56, Memorandum of Understanding with the Victor Elementary School District to Fund School Resource Officers, and Agreement between the City of Victorville and Macerich Victor Valley, LP
Recommendation:
That the Honorable City Council:
(1) Approve the Fifty-Sixth Amendment to Law Enforcement Contract #94-909-A-56 for the period of July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, and authorize the Mayor or her designee to process all documents required for this agreement; (2) Approve the Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Victorville and the Victor Elementary School District for the same period to fund School Resource Officers and authorize the City Manager or his designee to process all documents required for this agreement; and
(3) Approve the agreement by and between the City of Victorville and Macerich Victor Valley, LP for one Deputy and authorize the City Manager or his designee to process all documents required for this agreement.
Fiscal Impact:
This Amendment to the Law Enforcement Contract totals $41,992,496, an increase of $3,038,381 from the prior amendment. Sufficient funds will be budgeted in the FY 2026- 2027 budget to cover the contract amount expense. Additionally, Code Compliance and Animal Services pay for a portion of the cost for dispatch services in the amount not to exceed $56,000. Expenditures for the Law Enforcement Contract will be funded from the following accounts:
Account Code Amount
1002001-52300-50011
(Police Contract Services SBCSD)
$38,920,584.73
1052001-52300-50011 $3,071,911.27
4 6
9 9
(MP Police Contract Services SBCSD)
1004030-52300-50011
(Code Compliance Contract Services SBCSD)
$14,000.00
1005020-52300-50011
(Animal Control Contract Services SBCSD)
$14,000.00
1054030-52300-50011
(MP Code Compliance Contract Services SBCSD)
$14,000.00
1055020-52300-50011
(MP Animal Control Contract Services SBCSD)
$14,000.00
TOTAL EXPENSE: $42,048,496.00
Victorville Elementary School District (VESD) reimburses the City for their respective shares of cost for the four School Resource Officers (SROs), as well as Macerich Victor Valley, LP (Macerich) for their share of cost for one Deputy. The amounts reimbursed are as follows:
Account Code Amount
1002001-47230-50012
Police Reimbursement VESD SRO
(Revenue)
$1,289,788.80
1052001-47230-50021
Police Contract – Macerich
(Revenue)
$369,490.70
TOTAL REIMBURSED: $1,659,279.53
Strategic Plan Goal:
This item aligns with Goal B, Public Safety, implementing public safety strategies to support a thriving and growing community.
Background:
Since 1963, Victorville has contracted with the San Bernardino County Sheriff for law enforcement services. On April 28, 2026, San Bernardino County Sheriff, Shannon Dicus, held an annual meeting with contracting agencies and their respective City Managers to discuss the upcoming contract changes and cost projections as outlined in the Schedule A for FY 2026-2027.
Discussion:
The Fifty-Sixth Amendment to Law Enforcement Contract #94-909-A-56 replaces the Schedule A, providing law enforcement services to the City of Victorville for the period of July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027. This Schedule A Amendment includes an increase from the previous contract in the amount of $3,038,381 or 7.8%.
This increase is related to higher costs associated with vehicle insurance, personnel liability and bonding, the addition of the Axon contract, and the increased cost of Deputies as approved by the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the San Bernardino 4 6
9 9
County and the Sheriff’s Employees’ Benefits Association (SEBA), approved by the Board of Supervisors on September 9, 2025.
Police staffing includes the following:
Sworn Officers 103.00
General Support Staff 43.33
Total 146.33
These staffing levels include four (4) SROs assigned to VESD. The attached MOU represents those officers working in and around the schools to provide a safer learning environment. The MOU serves as the mechanism to gain reimbursement for the use of said services and effectively offsets the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Contract.
The MOU with VESD will pay 75% of the cost of two (2) deputies, 100% of the cost of two (2) deputies and include fuel and maintenance costs of three and one half (3.5) marked police vehicles, which amount to $1,289,788.83.
The Deputy assigned to the Mall of Victor Valley (“Mall”) was added in May of 2022 at the request of Macerich. The Deputy is assigned to the Mall full-time and is responsible for the enforcement of all criminal law violations on and in proximity to the Mall, and all traffic laws on and in proximity to the Mall property. This additional Deputy supplements the security services currently offered by Macerich and does not have any reduction in said services.
The attached agreement with Macerich represents the Deputy working in and around the Mall to provide a safer community environment. The agreement serves as the mechanism to gain reimbursement for the use of said services and effectively offsets the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Contract. The agreement with Macerich will pay 100% of the cost to provide one (1) San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Deputy and the cost of one (1) marked unit in the amount of $369,490.70 for the next fiscal year.
Therefore, staff recommends that the Honorable City Council approve the Fifty-Sixth Amendment to Law Enforcement Contract #94-909-A-56, authorize the Mayor or her designee to process all documents required for this agreement, approve the MOU as listed above, and authorize the City Manager or his designee to process all documents required for the MOU with the Victor Elementary School District and agreement with Macerich Victor Valley, LP.
Staff remains available for any questions or comments you may have.
Prepared By:
Darcy Mahoney-Henson, Administrative Analyst
4 6
9 9
Attachments: A. Fifty-Sixth Amendment to Law Enforcement Contract #94-909-A- 56 B. Memorandum of Understanding with the Victor Elementary School District
C. Agreement Between Victorville and Macerich Victor Valley, LP
ATTACHMENT A
Fifty-Sixth Amendment to Law
Enforcement Contract
#94-909-A-56
Standard Contract Page 1 of 4
THE INFORMATION IN THIS BOX IS NOT A PART OF THE CONTRACT AND IS FOR COUNTY USE ONLY
Sheriff/Coroner/Public Administrator
Department Contract Representative Carolina Mendoza, Chief Deputy Director of Sheriff’s Administration
Telephone Number (909) 387-0640
Contractor City of Victorville
Contractor Representative Elizabeth Becerra, Mayor
Telephone Number (760) 955-5000
Contract Term 07/01/2026 through 06/30/2027
Original Contract Amount $ 41,992,496
Amendment Amount --------------
Total Contract Amount $ 41,992,496
Cost Center 4414551000
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
AMENDMENT No. 56
Effective July 1, 202 6, Contract No. 94-909 to provide law enforcement service s to the City of Victorville is hereby amended by replacing the Schedule A referred to in Section II. CONSIDERATION with the new Schedule A that is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Except as amended, all other terms and conditions of this Contract remain as stated therein.
Contract Number
94-909 A-56
SAP Number
N/A