Agenda packet — West Sacramento City Council, September 18, 2024 (part 8 of 8)

Introduction
On Thursday, March 23, 2023, from 6:00 – 7:30 pm., the
City of West Sacramento hosted the first Community
Workshop at the West Sacramento City Hall Galleria at
1110 West Capitol Avenue as part of the public outreach process for the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street
Plan. Attendees had the opportunity to learn more about the plan, discuss details of the project with the planning team, and share their feedback on potential
improvements to the Sacramento Avenue corridor,
including bike and pedestrian safety changes and
landscaping design. A total of 66 community members
attended the workshop.

Project Background & Overview
Sacramento Avenue is a major east-west commercial corridor through West Sacramento and provides a key connection to the City of Sacramento, to Interstate 5, and to Interstate 80. The roadway serves diverse residential communities and provides access to outdoor recreation opportunities, local restaurants, grocery and commercial stores, schools, and churches. The Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan will include community-driven improvements to Sacramento Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and 2nd Street to provide more safe and comfortable transportation options for people of all ages and abilities while also enhancing public spaces for community activity along the corridor. The Plan will aim to support equitable and sustainable development along Sacramento Avenue and to mitigate existing barriers for those who walk, bike, and take transit, including stressful intersection crossings and the lack of comfortable bicycle and sidewalk facilities. This phase of the planning process focuses on making recommendations to improve Sacramento Avenue, including improvements to streets, intersections, landscape, and building frontages using Complete Street planning and design elements.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 84 1069

Page 2 of 16 ends

Workshop Purpose & Format
The purpose of the initial Community Workshop is to
introduce the project to the public and solicit community feedback on ways to make future improvements to
Sacramento Avenue. The workshop included background
information on the planning process and community
engagement schedule, key components of the plan, and
interactive stations for attendees to share their thoughts and comments. Members from the City and consultant
design team were available during the workshop to
answer questions and provide clarity on the plan.

The workshop was structured in an open-house format
with multiple stations for attendees to visit: a section with informational project exhibits, an interactive station where participants could answer questions with dot stickers, tables with detailed maps of the corridor, and a commenting station with cards for public feedback.

Information Station
Board 1: Background & Schedule
• This exhibit included a map of the project location, an overview of the plan purpose, the planning teams’ approach, and an estimated timeline for the planning and community engagement process.

Board 2: What is a “Complete Street”?
• This exhibit included a vision statement for the plan as well as some key components of what defines a complete street. Example photos of potential street improvements were also included.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 85 1070

Page 3 of 16 ends

Interactive Stations
Board 3: How do you use Sacramento Avenue?
• This exhibit prompted participants to share their feedback on what kind of corridor they would like to see Sacramento Avenue transformed into. Participants could choose a different sticker color for whether they live/work along Sacramento Avenue or if they are from the broader West Sacramento region.

Board 4: How could Sacramento Avenue be transformed?
• This exhibit prompted participants to share their feedback on what kind of trips they take on Sacramento and what mode of travel they use. Dot stickers were available at this exhibit.

Interactive Segment Map Station
This station included exhibits on tables, post-it notes and pens for participants to share their feedback on each of the below segments of the Sacramento Avenue corridor. Each exhibit included a map of the corridor segment, statistics about traffic and safety on the segment, and a prompt to identify priority areas for improvement. • Segment 1: Harbor Blvd/Reed Ave to Solano St
• Segment 2: Solano St to Todhunter Ave
• Segment 3: Todhunter Ave to Jefferson
Blvd/Kegle Dr
• Segment 4: Jefferson Blvd/Kegle Dr to Douglas St
• Segment 5: Douglas St to California St
• Segment 6: California St to 3rd St

The following page includes images of the six-segment maps. The full-sized version of the maps is available in the Appendix section of this document.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 86 1071

Page 4 of 16 ends

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 87 1072

Page 5 of 16 ends

Summary of Feedback
Below is a summary of all feedback received from the interactive boards and stations.

Question 1: How could Sacramento Avenue be transformed?

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 88 1073

Page 6 of 16 ends

Question 2a: How do you use Sacramento Avenue?

Question 2b: How do you typically travel to or on Sacramento Avenue?

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 89 1074

Page 7 of 16 ends

Segment 1: Harbor/Reed to Solano

General input for this road segment included:
• 6 comments about sidewalks (more on both sides of Sacramento Ave., more accessible, and widened sidewalks)
• 5 comments about fixing potholes
• 4 comments about improving bicycle lanes (clearly marked paths, creating more bicycle buffer space, and safer bike lanes at intersections)
• 3 comments about road diets or traffic slowing
• 3 comments about more streetlights
• 2 comments about pedestrian crossings (need crossings that are accessible for those who are blind/hearing-impaired)
• Add reflectors to road for night driving
• Bus stop benches and trash cans need to be maintained

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 90 1075

Page 8 of 16 ends

Segment 2: Solano to Todhunter
General input for this road segment included:
• 5 comments about sidewalk improvements (more on both side of Sacramento Ave, need to be separated by landscaping, and widened sidewalks)
• 3 comments about improved or safer bicycle lanes
• 3 comments about more street lighting
• 2 comments about traffic slowing/road diets
• 2 comments about fixing potholes
• Need more pedestrian crossings
• Subsidize electric bikes for the community
• Utilize properly developed traffic circles at major intersections to control speed while maintaining traffic flow
• More speed laws enforcement through Cummins Ave.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 91 1076

Page 9 of 16 ends

Segment 3: Todhunter to Jefferson/Kegle
General input for this road segment included:
• 3 comments about bicycle facilities including adding bike racks or protected bike lanes • Wider sidewalks
• Need to make vehicle lane changes/merging safer
• Landscaping could improve
• Better street lighting
• Slow traffic down
• Accessible crosswalks for those who are blind/hearing-impaired

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 92 1077

Page 10 of 16 ends

Segment 4: Jefferson/Kegle to Douglas
General input for this road segment included:
• 3 comments about adding bicycle lanes, specifically protected bike lanes • 2 comments about adding street lighting to improve pedestrian safety • 2 comments about redoing street or sidewalk paving (the road currently feels too rough/bumpy) • 2 comments about planting more native trees with substantial shade or other landscaping in strips • Wide sidewalks
• More farmers markets
• Slow traffic
• The intersection light barrier is confusing to drivers • Channelization is not safe
• Elevation change hinders visibility
• Separate pedestrian paths

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 93 1078

Page 11 of 16 ends

Segment 5: Douglas to California

General input for this road segment included:
• 4 comments about clearly marking bike lanes or adding protected bike lanes • 2 comments about street lighting
• 2 comments about beautifying open lots near the train tracks (ie. walking paths, trees, benches) • Gravel from potholes gets into bicycle lanes
• Sidewalks are incomplete or missing
• Curve in the road needs to be straightened out
• Street parking for businesses at the curves in the road is dangerous • Need to slow traffic

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 94 1079

Page 12 of 16 ends

Segment 6: California to 3rd

General input for this road segment included:
• 3 comments about protected bicycle lanes on both sides/bicycle safety throughout area • 2 comments about pedestrian/bicycle safety at road curves and needing a signal light to slow down cars • 2 comments about needing parking at curves for local residents • 2 comments about needing safer sidewalks or protected pedestrian walkways • Renovate old buildings such as the locksmith and gas station buildings • Street lighting
• I'd like to see a community area with small restaurants. Not a commercial area/thoroughfare to freeway on-ramps
• Replace wild river trees with new shade trees and landscaping • Fill potholes
• Decorative crosswalks at the corner of C/5th

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 95 1080

Page 13 of 16 ends

Comment Card Input
Nineteen community members submitted feedback via
comment cards during the open house. Below is a
compilation, sorted by topic.

Safety Concerns
• Have been a homeowner in the area for six years
and would like to see protected bike lanes, and
crosswalks like West Capitol project. I'm often
concerned for my safety when traveling on the
corridor in current conditions.
• I live off Sacramento Avenue and Yolo Street. I
would like to see bike lanes added to the corridor,
so I can commute on my bike, and feel safe walking
to local businesses such as Cornerstone Café. I'm
excited to see the progress on Sac Ave and feel
more connected to the community by walking and
biking.
• I live on Sac Ave right on the turn after Broderick's.

We have called in multiple accidents. Our street is
full of potholes, has no clear speed limit, no
sidewalks, and walking on the shoulder is
dangerous. These limitations make it hard to enjoy
all the great things our neighborhood has to offer.
• The curve headed west from C St to Sac Ave is
particularly and uniquely wild. No marked speed
limit, contradictory signage, and people cutting the
lanes.
• In general, the traffic needs to slow. Maybe cut
lanes down if that's feasible. I would love to ride
my bike places on Sac Ave but don't feel safe. Having complete sidewalks on both sides of the road and bike racks at businesses.

Community/Green Spaces
• I'd like to see a community area with safety features, not a way for Sacramento residents/victors to use as an exit.
• Would love to see the corridor with more green spaces, protected bike lanes, and plenty of space for social activities/leisure.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 96 1081

Page 14 of 16 ends

• Improvements need to be made and this appears to be a good start. As a resident of more than 30 years my concern is that this will become a heavily traveled, filled with traffic. I would like to see café or small businesses. No heavy commercialization, community growth and landscaping would be greatly needed. • Happy to see an investment in the North area of West Sac. We need our pools and water park. Invest in the roads of the people. We want a community
center.
• I'd like to see a designated no-car area somewhere
with access to dinning and shops.
• Slow down traffic by Broderick's Café. Ample
sidewalks with some seating. Small businesses,
outside cafes with outdoor seating.

Transportation from West Sac to other areas,
including Sacramento.

Walking and Biking Facilities
• My vision for Sac Ave: 1 lane road in each
direction, a center median with landscaping, bike
lanes with green paint on each side of the street,
protected bike lanes at the part where Sac Ave
curves, and another crosswalk between Bryte Ave
and Harbor Blvd.
• As a resident of Broderick, I would utilize safer
walking/biking along roadways (Sac Ave), e-bike/scooters, restaurants/bars align Sac Ave, public parks (green space w/trees, benches, trash, playgrounds).
• Improve current bike lanes. Paint in the 3’ buffer. Create a bike lane at intersections between a car lane for turning right, and vehicle going straight. Get rid of turn lane in the middle of the road to make room for the bicycle safety lanes.

Roadway Concerns
• We need the road reinforced. Too many potholes. It will only get worse once the eagerly awaited I Street bridge is built. So excited to have easy access to the Railyards. • As we improve river crossings and the I Street Bridge, we invite more traffic onto Sac Ave. People already use it as a short form from I-80 to I-5, which doesn’t work because of I bridge’s limitations.

Other
• Choices are very vague. These are not specific, very vague. • I have concerns about our levee system on the north side. We need more work done in the events of more atmospheric rivers.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 97 1082

Page 15 of 16 ends

Workshop Notification & Awareness
During the three-week outreach process, the project team implemented a public awareness campaign about the
workshop. A full-sized version of the flyer is available in the Appendix of this document. The workshop flyer, mailer,
and lawn signs included Spanish and Russian translations.

The following summarizes the notification efforts made to increase awareness of the community workshop:
• Community partners: Community partners were
contacted via phone and email to notify them of
the City of West Sacramento’s planning efforts for
the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan.

This included representatives from
transportation/environmental advocacy groups,
community-based organizations, schools, public
safety organizations, neighborhood associations,
churches, business interests, and local
destinations.
• Email Notifications: The project team distributed
two email notifications via Constant Contact on
March 1 and March 9, and made personal emails
to community partners about the upcoming Open
House.
• Social Media: The City of West Sacramento posted
the event flyer on their Facebook, Instagram, and
Twitter pages on March 1, and made reminder
posts leading up to the workshop. Additionally, the
project team also made posts in local West Sacramento Facebook groups about the workshop. • Utility Mailer: The workshop flyer was included in the March utility mailer sent to homes located adjacent to the project area.
• Flyer delivery: The project team delivered workshop flyers to businesses located along the length of the Sacramento Avenue corridor. Flyers were also posted in the windows of these local businesses or available at the front counters for customers to take.
• Lawn Signs: The project team posted lawn signs at regular intervals along Sacramento Avenue. • Media: The City of West Sacramento distributed a media release to local news outlets on March 14. KCRA 3 wrote and published an article about the project and community workshop on March 24. KCRA 3 staff were also present at the community workshop and interviewed attendees and City staff about the project.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 98 1083

Page 16 of 16 ends

Appendix
• Workshop Exhibits (10)
• Workshop Flyer
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 99 1084

Page 1 of 15 ends

Introduction
On Tuesday, October 10, 2023, from 6:00 – 7:30 pm., the City of West Sacramento hosted the second Community Workshop at the West Sacramento City Hall Galleria at 1110 West Capitol Avenue as part of the public outreach process for the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan. Attendees had the opportunity to hear a project update, discuss the proposed improvements with the planning team, and share their feedback on potential changes to the Sacramento Avenue corridor, including bike and pedestrian safety changes and landscaping design. A total of 38 community members attended the workshop.

The roadway serves diverse residential
communities and provides access to outdoor
recreation opportunities, local restaurants,
grocery and commercial stores, schools, and
churches. The Sacramento Avenue Complete
Street Plan will include community-driven
improvements to Sacramento Avenue between
Harbor Boulevard and 3rd Street to provide more
safe and comfortable transportation options for
people of all ages and abilities while also
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 100 1085

Page 2 of 15 ends

enhancing public spaces for community activity
along the corridor. The Plan will aim to support
equitable and sustainable development along
Sacramento Avenue and to mitigate existing
barriers for those who walk, bike, and take transit,
including stressful intersection crossings and the
lack of comfortable bicycle and sidewalk facilities.

This phase of the planning process focuses on
making recommendations to improve Sacramento
Avenue, including improvements to streets,
intersections, landscape, and building
frontages using Complete Street planning and
design elements.

Workshop Purpose & Format
The purpose of the initial Community Workshop in
March 2023 was to introduce the project to the
public and gather community feedback on
challenges they experience while traveling along
Sacramento Avenue. The purpose of the second
workshop is to provide an update on the planning
work that has been completed using initial public
input, and also to present and solicit community
feedback on potential street improvements to
Sacramento Avenue. The workshop included
background information on the planning process
and community engagement schedule, key
components of the plan, and interactive stations
for attendees to share their thoughts and
comments. Members from the City and
consultant design team were available during the
workshop to answer questions and provide clarity
on the plan.

The workshop was structured in an open-house
format with multiple stations for attendees to visit: a section with informational project exhibits, an interactive station where participants could note their preferences with dot stickers, tables with interactive exhibits, and a commenting station with cards for public feedback.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 101 1086

Page 3 of 15 ends

Summary of Feedback
Below is a summary of all feedback received from the interactive boards and stations.

1. Interactive Board: Corridor Opportunities

Comments:
• Keep trucks off North Harbor, make the river road to Woodland a bike destination. • Driveway entry concern at 1453 Sacramento Avenue. Maintain full property width access. • Road diet Sacramento Avenue enough to discourage through traffic to the I-80. • What will happen to trees on empty lots on Sacramento Avenue? • Support for signal at Douglas.
• Add signal light at Douglas and Sacramento Avenue.
• Add lighting on Sacramento Avenue for crosswalk by Brodericks. • Railroad quiet zone here (D and 3rd Street).

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 102 1087

Page 4 of 15 ends

Participants also added dot stickers (showing agreement) on the following improvements listed on the board:
• Safer crosswalks (1)
• Continuous sidewalks (1)
• Douglas Street and Reuter Drive Intersection Safety Improvement: Traffic Signal and Crosswalks (1)

2. Interactive Board: Roadway Design Concepts #1
Comments:
• Protected bike lanes should extend to new I Street bridge/new bike bridge • Plant some Ginkgo trees, please!

Participants also added dot stickers (showing agreement) on the following improvements listed on the board:
• Sidewalk-level raised bike lane with rolled curb (1)
• Parking-protected bike lanes between 4th and 3rd Streets (1) Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 103 1088

Page 5 of 15 ends

3. Interactive Board: Roadway Design Concepts #2
Comments:
• Prefer bollards.

Participants also added dot stickers (showing agreement) on the following improvements listed on the board:
• Landscape protected bikeways and sidewalk (6)
o Green infrastructure protection (1)
• Two-way neighborhood shared use path (6)
o Shared mobility area for all users (1)
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 104 1089

Page 6 of 15 ends

4. Interactive Board: Roadway Design Concepts #3

Comments:
• Native landscaping please.

Participants also added dot stickers (showing agreement) on the following improvements listed on the board:
• Protected one-way bikeways and sidewalk (2)
• On-street bike facilities and shared use path through Elkhorn Plaza (5)

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 105 1090

Page 7 of 15 ends

5. Interactive Board: Intersection Treatments

Comments:
• C and 5th should be protected for pedestrian/bike traffic. • Center of roundabout should not be over 3 feet in height. • I am in favor of a roundabout at Jefferson/Kegle.
• Jefferson/Kegle would be a great location for a roundabout. • Jefferson/Kegle at Sacramento Avenue should not have a roundabout. • Concern about increase in ? on Kegle and emergency access. • Need clear signage on who can enter [roundabouts], when to enter, who gets right of way. • Please consider increasing roundabout use through all major intersections of the project.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 106 1091

Page 8 of 15 ends

Participants also added dot stickers (showing agreement) on the following improvements listed on the board:
• High visibility crosswalk (2)
• Curb extension (bulb-out) (1)

6. Interactive Board: Elkhorn Plaza Social Node

Comments:
• The bend at the end of Sacramento Avenue (by Brodericks Restaurant) is dark and dangerous We need better lights and signals in this area.
• Don’t see the point of EV charging here, but lighting, bike/scooter station and a path would be great.

Participants also added dot stickers (showing agreement) on the following improvements listed on the board:
• Enhancement opportunities View 1 (1)
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 107 1092

Page 9 of 15 ends

• Enhancement opportunities View 2 (1)

7. Interactive Board: Jefferson-Kegle Social Hub

Participants added dot stickers (showing agreement) on the following improvements listed on the board:
• Schematic plan option 1 (2)
• Schematic plan option 2 (3)

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 108 1093

Page 10 of 15 ends

8. Interactive Board: Elkhorn Plaza Social Node

Comments:
• Bryte is a big family neighborhood – dedicated walking and biking paths will be great. • Traffic calming ideas: narrow roads, roundabouts
• 6th and Brodericks intersection is a problem, more pedestrian beacons • Close sidewalk gaps, widen sidewalks, more lighting, visibility is a problem at night, tow trucks are parked in the median at Bryte and Sacramento Avenue

Participants also added dot stickers (showing agreement) on the following improvements listed on the board:
• Accessible green corridor (3)

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 109 1094

Page 11 of 15 ends

9. Interactive Board: Additional proposed improvements

Participants added dot stickers (showing agreement) on the following improvements listed on the board:
• Two-way bike lane (2)
• One-way bike lane (2)
• Street trees (2)
• Bicycle parking (1)
• Food truck/Mini market
(1)
• Mobile library (1)
• EV charging (1)
• Multi-use path (1)
• Pollinator habitat (1)
• Green infrastructure (1)
• Outdoor dining (1)

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 110 1095

Page 12 of 15 ends

10. Interactive Board: Sacramento Avenue Corrdior Map

Map comments:
• Light pollution reduction
• Ginkgo trees
• Tow trucks parked in media (between Bryte
and Todhunter)
• Weeds and bushes (between Bryte and
Todhunter)
• Roundabout, yes! (at Sacramento Ave/Simon
Terrace
• Roundabout (at Sacramento Ave/Douglas)

Participants dot stickers on the project map based on the type of concern:
• Flooding:
o Douglas St/Sacramento Avenue (3)
o Kegle Dr/Cummins Way (1)
• Power:
o Kegle Dr/Anna St (1)
o Douglas Ave (between Sacramento
Ave and Cummins Way) (1)
o Elder Dr/Fremont Blvd (1)
• Other concerns:
o Douglas Ave (between Sacramento
Ave and Cummins Way) (1)
o Sunset Ave/Sacramento Avenue (1)
o Bryte Ave/Sacramento Avenue (1)
o Sacramento Ave/6th St (1)

Additionally, participants could share their feedback on specific questions around challenges with Sacramento Avenue on this same board display. On the following page is a table showing the prompting question (left) and public feedback (right).

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 111 1096

Page 13 of 15 ends

Question Public Comments
Have you experienced flooding on
Sacramento Avenue?
• Have not experienced flooding – sand and prior levee
area.

Does flooding occur during abnormally
heavy rains, or almost every time it rains?
• Residential intersections with Elkhorn Plaza flood almost every time it rains.

How reliable is electricity in this area? • Not at all – much lights needed. Needs PG&E to check.

Lights flicker a lot on Douglas and Fremont.

How often have you experienced power
outages and how long does the outage
occur?
• 3 – 4 times per year. Once it was out for 4 days. Put power lines underground while doing this project three times. • 2 – 3 times a year. Lost power multiple day storm last new year.

Have you experienced sewer backups? No comments
Do you have any complaints about the
sanitary sewer system?
No comments
List other concerns/comments • Pedestrian safety, ie. unleashed dogs, speeding vehicles • More efficient police response to illegal fireworks
• Water supply
• More retail shops, Safeway replacement store
• Movie theater
• Potholes
• There should not be a roundabout on Sacramento
Ave/Kegle Dr, Jefferson, or Bryte Ave.
• Empty lots – unkempt
• Trees – will they be cut down
• Speeding cars on streets that cannot have speed bumper due to fire department throughway.
• Roundabout Douglas and Sacramento Ave
• Number of apartments/drivers added to
Kegle/Sacramento Ave and Elkhorn Plaza makes for
messy entrance to Sacramento Avenue
• Lack of street lighting lack of pedestrian crossings
• Curve at Sacramento Ave and 6th St is unlit and high
pedestrian traffic
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 112 1097

Page 14 of 15 ends

Comment Card Input
Four community members submitted feedback via comment cards during the open house. • At 1453 Sacramento Avenue – entry to remain the same width. Our driveway is entire property width.

Roundabout at Kegle/Jefferson = pedestrian nightmare.
• Many curbs are not appropriately identified (curb or ramp?) • 1. Build a step on step off trolley runs on Sacramento Ave to 3rd or Jefferson back on tower gateway to tower bridge across on 5th downtown Sacramento and back up I Street. 2. Huge regional fountain like Salmon Street sprints in Portland that people will come and stay all day. 3. Railroad quiet zone at D and 3rd Street. Just need street traffic directionals.
• Why is the old Safeway store still vacant? What is the city doing to put in more retail stores? We need a ban on construction vehicles on city streets blocking drivers view. More enforcement of non-operational vehicles taking up space.

Workshop Notification & Awareness
During the three-week outreach process, the project
team implemented a public awareness campaign about
the workshop. A full-sized version of the flyer is available in the Appendix of this document. The workshop flyer,
utility mailer, and lawn signs included Spanish and Russian translations.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 113 1098

Page 15 of 15 ends

• Social Media: The City of West Sacramento posted the event flyer on their Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter pages, and made reminder posts leading up to the workshop. • Utility Mailer: The workshop flyer was included in the September utility mailer sent to homes located adjacent to the project area.
• Flyer delivery: The project team delivered workshop flyers to businesses located along the length of the Sacramento Avenue corridor. Flyers were also posted in the windows of these local businesses or available at the front counters for customers to take.
• Lawn Signs: The project team posted lawn signs at regular intervals along Sacramento Avenue. • Media: The City of West Sacramento distributed a media release to local news outlets. KRCA 3 published an article about the workshop.

Appendix
• Workshop Exhibits (10)
• Workshop Flyer
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 114 1099
Introduction
On August 3, 2023, the City of West Sacramento hosted a popup workshop at the Yolo County Children’s Alliance’s Back-toSchool Family Resource fair at Bryte Park (425 Todhunter Avenue). The goal of the pop-up event was to meet community members at spaces where they were already gathering to
encourage them to participate in the Sacramento Avenue
Complete Street Plan, gather their feedback on potential street improvements, and promote upcoming outreach opportunities planned for Fall 2023.

The project team engaged approximately thirty community members about the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan, handed out more than 100 flyers with information on the project website, and distributed more than 125 cards promoting the community meeting planned for Fall 2023.

Project Background & Overview
Sacramento Avenue is a major east-west commercial corridor through West Sacramento and provides a key connection to the City of Sacramento, to Interstate 5, and to Interstate 80. The roadway serves diverse residential communities and provides access to outdoor recreation opportunities, local restaurants, grocery and commercial stores, schools, and churches. The Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan will include
community-driven improvements to Sacramento Avenue
between Harbor Boulevard and 3rd Street to provide more safe and comfortable transportation options for people of all ages and abilities while also enhancing public spaces for community activity along the corridor. The Plan will aim to support equitable and sustainable development along Sacramento Avenue and to mitigate existing barriers for those who walk, bike, and take transit, including stressful intersection crossings and the lack of comfortable bicycle and sidewalk facilities. This phase of the planning process focuses on making recommendations to improve Sacramento Avenue, including improvements to streets, intersections, landscape, and building frontages using Complete Street planning and design elements.

Pop-up Workshop Purpose & Format
The pop-up workshop was one of many booths available for community members to visit during the Back-toSchool Resource Fair. Project team members engaged families and individuals in a conversation about Sacramento Avenue, what is being planned for improvement, and upcoming outreach opportunities for sharing Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 115 1100
input. The purpose of the pop-up workshop is to spread awareness of the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan, obtain community feedback on how the street can better fit their needs, and encourage people to visit the project website for upcoming engagement opportunities.

Interactive Boards
In addition to handing out collateral pieces such as project fliers and business cards, the project team also asked pop-up workshop attendees to share their input on the two (2) interactive board displays using dot stickers.

Below is an overview of the feedback received, organized by board.

Board 1: What [improvements] would you like to see?
This interactive board prompted participants to choose the street and infrastructure improvements they would like to see made on Sacramento Avenue. The project team received thirteen (13) votes total. • Safer Crossings
o High-Visibility Crosswalks with
Flashing Beacons – 3 votes
o Media Refuge Islands – 0 votes
o Curb Extension (Bulb-Out) – 0 votes
• One-Way Protected Bikeways
o Bollard Protected Bike Lane – 0 votes
o Concrete Protected Bikeways – 3
votes
o Landscaping Protected Bikeways – 1
vote
• Two-Way Bike Facilities
o Shared-Use Path – 0 votes
o Shared-Use Path with Landscape – 2
votes
o Bike-Only Cycle Track – 1 votes
• Raised Bikeways
o Sidewalk-Leve Raised Bikeway – 2
votes
o Rolled-Curb Raised Bikeway – 0 votes
o Two-Way Raised Bikeway – 1 vote

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 116 1101
Board 2: Sacramento Avenue Map
This board included information with an overview of the project and a map of where the project limitations are.

Participants were prompted to place dot stickers on areas of concern where they want to see improvements made. The project team received thirteen (13) votes in total. • 2 votes for the intersection of Kegle Drive and Sacramento Avenue • 2 votes for the intersection of Yolo Street and Sacramento Avenue • 1 vote for the intersection of 3rd Street and Sacramento Avenue • 1 vote for the intersection of 4th Street and Sacramento Avenue • 1 vote for the intersection of 5th Street and Sacramento Avenue • 1 vote for the intersection of California Street and Sacramento Avenue • 1 vote for the intersection of Elizabeth Street and 8th Street • 1 vote for the intersection of Kegle Drive and Fremont Boulevard • 1 vote for the intersection of Harbor Boulevard and Reed Avenue • 1 vote for the west most point of Reed Avenue
• 1 vote for the area slightly north of the Reed Avenue and Harbor Boulevard Next Steps
With the feedback collected during the initial phase of the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street, including from the first Community Workshop, the pop-up workshop, and through the project website online mapping tool, the project team will develop an initial draft of the Plan. The next phase of the project will include outreach to the community at-large to ensure that the Plan will meet the community’s needs.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 117 1102
Sacramento Ave Breath Bike Fes�val Pop-Up Memo
On Sunday, April 28th, 2024, the project team for West
Sacramento Ave atended the Breath May is Bike Month
Bike fes�val. Five team members engaged with community
members to discuss the upcoming release of the dra� plan for Sacramento Ave. The event provided an opportunity for community members to learn more about the project and
the inclusions to the forthcoming dra� plan. Over 100
project website cards and s�ckers were distributed to
atendees at the event.

Project team members in atendance included:
• The City of West Sacramento
• AIM Consul�ng
• GHD
Project Overview Sacramento Avenue is a major east-west commercial corridor through West Sacramento and
provides a pivotal connec�on to the City of Sacramento, Interstate 5, and Interstate 80. The roadway serves diverse residen�al communi�es and provides access to outdoor
recreation opportunities, local restaurants, grocery and commercial stores, schools, and churches. The Sacramento Avenue, Complete Street Plan, will include communitydriven improvements to Sacramento Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and 3rd Street to provide safer and more comfortable transportation options for people of all ages and abilities while enhancing public spaces for community activity along the corridor. The Plan will support equitable and sustainable development along Sacramento Avenue
and mitigate existing barriers for those who walk, bike, and take transit, including stressful intersection crossings and the lack of comfortable bicycle and sidewalk facilities. This phase of the planning process focuses on making
recommendations to improve Sacramento Avenue,
including improvements to streets, intersections,
Project team member Katie DeMaio
engages bicyclists with project boards
GHD Project Manager, Todd Tregenza,
talks to community members about draft
plan alternatives
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 118 1103
landscape, and building frontages using Complete Street planning and design elements.

Pop-Up Format
The pop-up format was designed to provide a comprehensive overview of the project. It featured a project map board, a dra� plan inclusions board, and a previous outreach board.

These boards were instrumental in educa�ng community members about the project’s progress, the proposed improvements, and the general project area. Project engineers and managers were on hand to explain the dra� plan ini�a�ves and project history. The pop-up event was centered around bicycling and bicycle safety, with project team members engaging with dozens of bicyclists about Sacramento Ave bicycle safety issues and improvements.

Next Steps
The next step for this project is to finalize the dra� plan and release it to the public.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 119 1104
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 120 1105

DRAFT SACRAMENTO AVENUE COMPLETE STREET PLAN PUBLIC COMMENT & RESPONSE LOG Comment Date Community
Member Name
Comment Response to Comment
05/23/2024 Amalie Kruzer
(Member of
Public)
Some feedback on the Western Area (Zone 3) of the Sacramento Ave improvement project. I apologize for the length, I just have a lot to say about this spot as I actually think it’s one of the more dangerous spots to bike in West Sacramento. I also apparently missed even hearing about all of the opportunities for earlier public comment, so here you go!
When riding a bike going northbound on Jefferson Blvd towards Sacramento Ave and continuing straight onto Kegle, there is a big uphill area right where the bike lane crosses the car traffic turning right. The uphill area (caused by the train bridge needing to go overhead) slows you down almost to a halt right where you need to go fast to get out of the way of cars. I see that with the roundabout design this problem would still exist. In fact, because roundabouts encourage car traffic to continually flow, I think the problem might actually get worse. It’s currently a very stressful place to try to cross. If you’re turning right it’s fine. But, if you need to go straight, you’re pedaling as hard as you can to go uphill while simultaneously turning your head every second to make sure that a car hasn’t appeared to run you over while you cross the lane. This is at the same time as hoping that you’re not arriving at this point with bad timing when a whole bunch of cars came because they won’t let you over and then you will have to stop in the bike lane and try to go uphill from a dead stop. And on top of that, imagine you’re pulling a trailer with kids inside which makes you even slower! Since the cars just had a downhill road to accelerate on, the cars can be going very fast. On top of this, that bike lane that you’re moving into in front of the light is always filled with road debris so you’re trying not to go over it and pop your tires.

I’ve tried various things to try to get around this area.

Thank you for your comment. The Sacramento
Avenue Complete Street Plan proposes
sidewalk-level separated bike lanes, where
feasible, and shared bike-pedestrian paths at
the roundabout intersections approaches. The
proposed roundabout design at Jefferson
Boulevard/Sacramento Avenue allows
bicyclists options, depending on their level of
confidence and comfort. Bicyclists have the
option to continue in the roundabout with the
flow of traffic or to "ramp-up" onto the shared
bike-pedestrian path and cross and the
designated crossing. Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacon (RRFB) will accompany a
pedestrian warning sign at the crossings to
enhance visibility of bicyclists and pedestrians
to drivers.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 121 1106
Comment Date Community
Member Name
Comment Response to Comment
Option 1: Riding my bike on the sidewalk up Jefferson. This is okay unless there’s anyone on the narrow sidewalk at all (and there are frequently motorized wheelchairs) but then you have to cross Sacramento Ave with the crosswalk button.

Option 2: Turn right on Sacramento Ave and then turn left onto a side street to get across into Bryte/Broderick area. As this requires getting over and turning left in front of 40mph traffic this isn’t great either.

Option 3: Just don’t bike. Sadly this is largely what has happened.

Currently it’s also a little tricky going south across this intersection (basically you have to use the pedestrian crosswalk to get across) so I am happy to see that the roundabout would help with this.

I saw in one of the post it note comments for this project that many cities are building bike lanes that are connected to the sidewalk instead of sharing the road with cars. (I downloaded the picture they added and attached it I loved it so much) (See picture included to the right). I think these are by far the best solution for bike lanes because they fill up with much less car road debris, I can go as slow as I need to uphill, and are just generally farther away from cars and safer. This is largely what Davis uses and they are so much better than the bike lanes right next to cars. I frequently bike with a trail-a-bike or a bike trailer with children.

Having cars speed past within feet of my children and having them kick rocks into them isn’t safe or pleasant. Have I done it before? Yes. Do I want to? No. So I end up riding on the sidewalk anyway. So from a practical standpoint if people are going to be riding on the sidewalk anyway, why not embrace it? The protected roadways with barriers don’t work either because the streets are never swept where the bike lane is. And it’s too huge of a hassle (trip ruining) if I get a flat tire. Road debris is seriously almost as bad as cars driving within inches of you.

Again, sorry for this very long explanation. I would really like to bike more through this intersection but this area is such a pain that it’s hard to. With the current roundabout diagram proposed I would probably just keep riding on the sidewalk up Sacramento Ave, but now I’ll have to navigate crossing/weaving through two crosswalks where cars may or Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 122 1107
Comment Date Community
Member Name
Comment Response to Comment
may not stop in order to get across Sacramento Ave. And I don’t have the option of pushing the crosswalk button either (but maybe the new design will have flashing pedestrian light buttons?).
6/5/24 Caitlin Mueller
(Member of
Public)
I am a resident of the Lighthouse neighborhood, and I just came across the complete street plan. I am so glad the city recognizes the need for improvements to Sacramento Ave. since my experience of the road is that it’s old, worn, barren, hot, and very unfriendly. I greatly appreciate the depth of research and thought put into the plan as well as the community engagement. I read through most of the comments on the interactive project map and I agree with many of them based on my personal experience.

I work as a landscape designer in the Sacramento area, so I especially look for the use of plants and trees. I appreciate that the plan encourages existing trees to be kept. A healthy decades old tree has tremendous value in terms of shade, beauty, a sense of place/community, and ecological benefit that cannot be quickly replaced. I understand the city has various Thank you for your comment. One of the themes
for the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan
is "Use natural, sustainable landscaping to
improve comfort, aesthetics, and resiliency." The
City will continue to consider green infrastructure
and stormwater management opportunities
through the development of this project in
accordance with the City's Landscape
Development Guidelines and Master Tree List.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 123 1108
Comment Date Community
Member Name
Comment Response to Comment
documents governing street trees, but it would be great if this plan emphasized trees more to ensure they don’t get cut in future plans due to cost or utility conflicts or any other issues.

While stormwater management is mentioned in the plan, this seems like a great opportunity to incorporate more stormwater management and green infrastructure features. Turning Sacramento Ave. into more of a “green street” would be great. Perhaps sections of the street could have vegetated swales/gutters. Various methods could be used to slow and reduce the flow of stormwater into the drain which would reduce the strain on the stormwater system. Perhaps there could be stormwater planters and sections of permeable pavers, San Mateo County put together a similar complete street plan but theirs focused more on the sustainable aspect. It has a ton of great information on sustainable streets that could be added to the Sacramento Ave. plan. Link to the site:
https://ccag.ca.gov/countywide-sustainable-streets-master-plan/ 05/30/2024 Alexandra
Schaal (member
of the Public)
Good afternoon! I saw the post about the Sacramento Avenue street plan on the West Sacramento FB group. I live in the State streets area, but occasionally utilize Sacramento Ave by car. After reading some of the design approach, my main opinion revolves around pedestrian access.

Most important to my household is the ability to walk and bike safely around town. We are pleased that sidewalks and bike lanes /paths are included. That said, we DO NOT like the "parking protected" bike lanes like downtown Sacramento has. They reduce visibility for both bikes and vehicles when coming to the corner of an intersection or driveway. I've had numerous close calls as a cyclist on 10 and K street for this reason.

Additionally, people still manage to park in the bike lane or open their car doors into the bike lane without paying attention. I implore West Sacramento to avoid this type of bike lane.

Thanks to the city of West Sacramento for working to improve pedestrian access in our city. And thank you for the opportunity to comment on plans.

Thank you for your comment. In general, the
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan
proposes sidewalk-level, separated bikeways,
where feasible. Parking-protected being lanes are
being considered in the Eastern Segment,
Segment 6 on C Street between 3rd Street and
4th Street. This concept will be further explored
in a separate project, the North 5th Street
Connectivity and Complete Street Project, which
will align C Street with the upcoming I Street
Bridge projects. The City has not yet initiated the
North 5th Street Connectivity and Complete
Street Project. Please contact the City's Capital
Projects Department for more information at 916-
617-4980 or [email protected].

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 124 1109
Appendix E: Detailed Concepts
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 125 1110
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 126 1111
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 127 1112
© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS © 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS © 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS © 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS LANDSCAPE SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE SIDEWALK R/W R/W

LANDSCAPE

SIDEWALK

LANDSCAPE

SIDEWALK SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE SIDEWALK

SIDEWALK

LANDSCAPE R/W R/W

R/W R/W R/W
R/W R17' R55' R17' R55' R17' R50' R16' REED AVE
HARBOR BLVD R50'
6' 8' 4' 11' 11' 11' 11' 11' 4' 8' 6' 23' 13' 12' 3' 13' 12' 14' 12' 5' 12' 12' 3' 6' 6' 11' 5' 11' 11' 11' 4'
8'
6'
11' 11' 4' 8' 6' 4' 5' 4' 6' 6' 3.5' 6' 10' 8' 10'
10' 10' 8' 10' 10' 8'
10'
10' 8' 8' Filename: \\ghdnet\ghd\US\Sacramento - 2200 21st\Projects\561\12587734\Digital_Design\ACAD\Figures\12587734-GHD-0000-EXH_SACRAMENTO-JEFFERSON.dwg Plot Date: 11 June 2024 - 2:33 PM Date Report No. Project No. 12587734 000 JUNE 2024Source: FIGURE A CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO COMPLETE STREET CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS REED AVE & HARBOR BLVD 0 1 inch = ft. 30 30 30 N Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 128 1113 © 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS © 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS © 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS © 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS R45' R18' R45' R18' R45' R17' R45' R19' SACRAMENTO AVE

KEGLE DR SACRAMENTO AVE JEFFERSON BLVD LANDSCAPE SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE SIDEWALK

SIDEWALK

SIDEWALK SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE

SIDEWALK

SIDEWALK R/W R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W

R/W R/W R/W SIDEWALK

LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE
14' 5' 6' 14' 11' 14' 5' 5' 12' 13' 11' 11' 14'
11' 11' 15.7' 5.5'
8' 6' 11' 11' 11' 14' 6.21' 8' 6' 8'
8' 8' 8' 8' 8' 8' 8' 6' 8' 11.4' 8'
6' 8' 8'
8' 8' 8' 11' 4.6' Filename: \\ghdnet\ghd\US\Sacramento - 2200 21st\Projects\561\12587734\Digital_Design\ACAD\Figures\12587734-GHD-0000-EXH_SACRAMENTO-JEFFERSON.dwg Plot Date: 10 June 2024 - 5:35 PM Date Report No. Project No. 12587734 000 JUNE 2024Source: FIGURE B CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO COMPLETE STREET CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS SACRAMENTO AVE & JEFFERSON BLVD 0 1 inch = ft. 30 30 30 N Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 129 1114

INDICATES R/W

AQUISITION, TYPICAL
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
SACRAMENTO AVE. SACRAMENTO AVE.

NORTH
SACRAMENTO AVENUE, HARBOR BLVD. TO BRYTE AVE.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 130 1115
© 2024 Microsoft Corporation © 2024 Maxar ©CNES (2024) Distribution Airbus DS R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
SACRAMENTO AVE. SACRAMENTO AVE.

NORTH
SACRAMENTO AVENUE, TODHUNTER AVE. TO JEFFERSON BLVD.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 131 1116

X X X X X X X
X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
R/W
PL
SACRAMENTO AVE. SACRAMENTO AVE. SACRAMENTO AVE.

SACRAMENTO AVENUE, DOUGLAS ST. TO 5TH ST.

NORTH
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 132 1117
Appendix F: Cost Estimates
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 133 1118
Draft Preliminary/Planning Level Estimate
Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan City of West Sacramento 5/1/2024
GHD Project No. 12587734
Item No. Item Description Unit of
Measure
Estimated
Quantity
Item Price (in
figures) Total (in figures)
1 Roundabout at Harbor Boulevard LS 1 $5,500,000.00 $5,500,000.00 2 Right-of-Way Acquisition SQFT 19300 $75.00 $1,447,500.00 3 Class IV Bikeway HMA (One-Way) LNMI 1.00 $475,000.00 $475,000.00 4 Class IV Bikeway Concrete Curbs LMMI 1.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 5 Bus Pad EA 2 $55,000.00 $110,000.00
6 Curb Ramp EA 20 $20,000.00 $400,000.00
7 Curb and Gutter LF 3200 $60.00 $192,000.00
8 Sidewalk SQFT 19100 $20.00 $382,000.00
9 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) EA 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 10 Median Curb LF 5800 $50.00 $290,000.00
11 Median (Stamped Concrete) SQFT 1500 $30.00 $45,000.00 12 Roadway Paving - HMA TON 3800 $200.00 $760,000.00
13 Roadway Paving - Subgrade CY 2900 $200.00 $580,000.00 14 Landscaping SQFT 21200 $12.00 $254,400.00
15 Street Lighting EA 28 $20,000.00 $560,000.00
16 Undergrounding Overhead Utilities LF 1584 $900.00 $1,425,600.00 Subtotal (Construction Costs) $12,531,500.00
17 Signal Modifications at Bryte and Todhunter EA 2 $600,000.00 $1,200,000.00 18 Class IV Bikeway HMA & Subgrade (One-Way) LNMI 0.60 $475,000.00 $285,000.00 19 Class IV Bikeway HMA & Subgrade (Two-Way) LNMI 0.20 $600,000.00 $120,000.00 20 Class IV Bikeway Concrete Curbs LMMI 0.80 $60,000.00 $48,000.00 21 Bus Pad EA 3 $55,000.00 $165,000.00
22 Curb Ramp EA 44 $20,000.00 $880,000.00
23 Curb and Gutter LF 3700 $60.00 $222,000.00
24 Sidewalk SQFT 22200 $20.00 $444,000.00
25 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) EA 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 26 Median Curb LF 3300 $50.00 $165,000.00
27 Median (Stamped Concrete) SQFT 1600 $30.00 $48,000.00 28 Roadway Paving - HMA TON 7000 $200.00 $1,400,000.00
29 Roadway Paving - Subgrade CY 5300 $200.00 $1,060,000.00 30 Landscaping SQFT 31100 $12.00 $373,200.00
31 Street Lighting EA 32 $20,000.00 $640,000.00
32 Undergrounding Overhead Utilities LF 1848 $900.00 $1,663,200.00 Subtotal (Construction Costs) $8,763,400.00
33 Roundabout at Jefferson Boulevard/Kegle Drive LS 1 $5,500,000.00 $5,500,000.00 34 Right-of-Way Acquisition SQFT 8500 $75.00 $637,500.00 35 Class IV Bikeway HMA & Subgrade (One-Way) LNMI 0.80 $475,000.00 $380,000.00 36 Class IV Bikeway Concrete Curbs LNMI 0.80 $60,000.00 $48,000.00 37 Bus Pad EA 1 $55,000.00 $55,000.00
38 Curb Ramp EA 12 $20,000.00 $240,000.00
39 Curb and Gutter LF 3700 $60.00 $222,000.00
40 Sidewalk SQFT 22200 $20.00 $444,000.00
41 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) EA 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 42 Median Curb LF 3400 $50.00 $170,000.00
43 Median (Stamped Concrete) SQFT 5000 $30.00 $150,000.00 44 Roadway Paving - HMA TON 3800 $200.00 $760,000.00
45 Roadway Paving - Subgrade CY 24300 $200.00 $4,860,000.00 46 Landscaping SQFT 42300 $12.00 $507,600.00
47 Street Lighting EA 28 $20,000.00 $560,000.00
48 Undergrounding Overhead Utilities LF 1848 $900.00 $1,663,200.00 Subtotal (Construction Costs) $16,247,300.00
49 Class IV Bikeway HMA & Subgrade (One-Way) LNMI 0.70 $475,000.00 $332,500.00 50 Class IV Bikeway Concrete Curbs LNMI 0.70 $60,000.00 $42,000.00 Segment 4 - Jefferson Boulevard/Kegle Drive to Douglas Street Segment 1 - Harbor Boulevard to Solano Street
Segment 2 - Solano Street to Todhunter Avenue
Segment 3 - Todhunter Avenue to Jefferson Boulevard/Kegle Drive 5/1/2024 R12587734C002.xlsx
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 134 1119
Draft Preliminary/Planning Level Estimate
Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan City of West Sacramento 5/1/2024
GHD Project No. 12587734
Item No. Item Description Unit of
Measure
Estimated
Quantity
Item Price (in
figures) Total (in figures)
51 Bus Pad EA 1 $55,000.00 $55,000.00
52 Curb Ramp EA 24 $20,000.00 $480,000.00
53 Curb and Gutter LF 3700 $60.00 $222,000.00
54 Sidewalk SQFT 22200 $20.00 $444,000.00
55 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) EA 2 $50,000.00 $100,000.00 56 Median Curb LF 3200 $50.00 $160,000.00
57 Median (Stamped Concrete) SQFT 4000 $30.00 $120,000.00 58 Roadway Paving - HMA TON 2400 $200.00 $480,000.00
59 Roadway Paving - Subgrade CY 1800 $200.00 $360,000.00 60 Landscaping SQFT 23900 $12.00 $286,800.00
61 Street Lighting EA 28 $20,000.00 $560,000.00
62 Undergrounding Overhead Utilities LF 1848 $900.00 $1,663,200.00 Subtotal (Construction Costs) $5,305,500.00
63 Class IV Bikeway HMA & Subgrade (One-Way) LNMI 0.70 $475,000.00 $332,500.00 64 Class IV Bikeway Concrete Curbs LNMI 0.70 $60,000.00 $42,000.00 65 Class I Path HMA & Subgrade LNMI 0.15 $410,000.00 $61,500.00 66 Class II Bike Lane - HMA & Subgrade LNMI 0.15 $360,000.00 $54,000.00 67 Curb Ramp EA 12 $20,000.00 $240,000.00
68 Curb and Gutter LF 4300 $60.00 $258,000.00
69 Sidewalk SQFT 25400 $20.00 $508,000.00
70 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) EA 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 71 Roadway Paving - HMA TON 3400 $200.00 $680,000.00
72 Roadway Paving - Subgrade CY 2500 $200.00 $500,000.00 73 Landscaping SQFT 28600 $12.00 $343,200.00
74 Street Lighting EA 30 $20,000.00 $600,000.00
75 Undergrounding Overhead Utilities LF 2112 $900.00 $1,900,800.00 Subtotal (Construction Costs) $5,570,000.00
76 Protected Intersection at C St/5th St LS 1 $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 77 Class IV Bikeway HMA & Subgrade (One-Way) LNMI 0.10 $475,000.00 $47,500.00 78 Class IV Bikeway Concrete Curbs LNMI 0.10 $60,000.00 $6,000.00 79 Curb Ramp EA 10 $20,000.00 $200,000.00
80 Curb and Gutter LF 900 $60.00 $54,000.00
81 Sidewalk SQFT 5400 $20.00 $108,000.00
82 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) EA 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 83 Median Curb LF 1300 $50.00 $65,000.00
84 Median (Stamped Concrete) SQFT 4500 $30.00 $135,000.00 85 Roadway Paving - HMA TON 4400 $200.00 $880,000.00
86 Roadway Paving - Subgrade CY 3300 $200.00 $660,000.00 87 Landscaping SQFT 2100 $12.00 $25,200.00
88 Street Lighting EA 22 $20,000.00 $440,000.00
89 Undergrounding Overhead Utilities LF 1320 $900.00 $1,188,000.00 Subtotal (Construction Costs) $4,858,700.00
Total Construction Costs Without Undergrounding
Subtotal Construction $43,772,400.00
Construction Cost Estimating Contingency 30% $13,131,720.00 Total Construction Costs $56,904,120.00
Construction Budget (Rounded) $56,905,000.00
Total Construction Costs with Undergrounding
Subtotal Construction $53,276,400.00
Construction Cost Estimating Contingency 30% $15,982,920.00 Total Construction Costs with Undergrounding $69,259,320.00 Construction Budget (Rounded) $69,260,000.00
Segment 5 - Douglas Street to California Street
Segment 6 - California Street to 2nd Street
5/1/2024 R12587734C002.xlsx
Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 135 1120

I’ve tried various things to try to get around this area.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 121 1121
Comment Date Community
Member Name
Comment Response to Comment
Option 1: Riding my bike on the sidewalk up Jefferson. This is okay unless there’s anyone on the narrow sidewalk at all (and there are frequently motorized wheelchairs) but then you have to cross Sacramento Ave with the crosswalk button.

Option 3: Just don’t bike. Sadly this is largely what has happened.

Again, sorry for this very long explanation. I would really like to bike more through this intersection but this area is such a pain that it’s hard to. With the current roundabout diagram proposed I would probably just keep riding on the sidewalk up Sacramento Ave, but now I’ll have to navigate crossing/weaving through two crosswalks where cars may or Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 122 1122
Comment Date Community
Member Name
Comment Response to Comment
may not stop in order to get across Sacramento Ave. And I don’t have the option of pushing the crosswalk button either (but maybe the new design will have flashing pedestrian light buttons?).
6/5/24 Caitlin Mueller
(Member of
Public)
I am a resident of the Lighthouse neighborhood, and I just came across the complete street plan. I am so glad the city recognizes the need for improvements to Sacramento Ave. since my experience of the road is that it’s old, worn, barren, hot, and very unfriendly. I greatly appreciate the depth of research and thought put into the plan as well as the community engagement. I read through most of the comments on the interactive project map and I agree with many of them based on my personal experience.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 123 1123
Comment Date Community
Member Name
Comment Response to Comment
documents governing street trees, but it would be great if this plan emphasized trees more to ensure they don’t get cut in future plans due to cost or utility conflicts or any other issues.

Additionally, people still manage to park in the bike lane or open their car doors into the bike lane without paying attention. I implore West Sacramento to avoid this type of bike lane.

Thanks to the city of West Sacramento for working to improve pedestrian access in our city. And thank you for the opportunity to comment on plans.

Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan Appendix | Page 124 1124
Attachment 3
RESOLUTION 24-97

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

APPROVING THE SACRAMENTO AVENUE COMPLETE STREET PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of West Sacramento was awarded a Sacramento Area Council of Governments 2021 Community Design Grant for the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution 21-49 on June 16, 2021, appropriating $35,330 of Measure N – Community Improvements Funds to the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Improvement Plan as part of the approval of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for FY 2021/22 and FY 2022/23; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the award of a professional services contract on October 19, 2022 to GHD, Inc for the development of the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan and approved Resolution 22-129 authorizing the transfer of $24,129 from the Measure N (Fund 111) to support the contract contingency and staff time; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 922, until January 1, 2030, accelerates the approval of sustainable, climate friendly bicycle and pedestrian projects by exempting them from CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan will help guide the City to transform Sacramento Avenue to meet the transportation needs of bicyclists and pedestrians into the future and promote safer and more accessible travel by all modes, thereby improving air quality, traffic congestion, and vehicle parking demand; and WHEREAS, the West Sacramento City Council has conducted a public hearing on the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan and has duly considered all information presented; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Find that the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and qualifies for a Statutory Exemption under Senate Bill 922 as an active transportation plan that promotes and encourages people to choose walking, bicycling, or rolling through the creation of safe, comfortable, connected, and accessible walking, bicycling, or rolling networks, and encourages alternatives to singleoccupancy vehicle trips pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 21080.20.

2. Adopt the Sacramento Avenue Complete Street Plan.
1125
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento this 18th day of September, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
1126

Statutory Exemptions. State code number:

_______________________________________________
Notice of Exemption Appendix E
To: Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency): ____________________________ P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 _______________________________________________ Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 County Clerk
(Address)
___________________________
___________________________
County of: __________________
Project Title: ____________________________________________________________________________ Project Applicant: ________________________________________________________________________ Project Location - Specific:

Project Location - City: ______________________ Project Location - County:

Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:
_____________________
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: _____________________________________________________ Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: ________________________________________________ Exempt Status: (check one):

Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
Reasons why project is exempt:

Lead Agency
Contact Person: ____________________________ Area Code/Telephone/Extension: _______________ If filed by applicant:

1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.

2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: ____________________________ Date:

Signed by Lead Agency Signed by Applicant
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code. Date Received for filing at OPR:

Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. _______________
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: ____________________________________ ______________________________________________
______________ Title: _______________________
Revised 2011
Attachment 4
1127
Attachment 5
RESOLUTION 24-105

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF $41,000 FROM THE MEASURE N FUND FOR THE

SACRAMENTO AVENUE COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP 10048)
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2021, the City of West Sacramento was awarded $273,000 in grant funding from the Sacramento Area Council of Governments for the 2021 Community Design Grant Program for the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution 21-49 on June 16, 2021 to authorize an allocation in the amount of $35,330 toward the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan (CIP 10048) to fulfill its local match requirement as a condition of the Sacramento Area Council of Government Community Design – Funding Program; and WHEREAS, a Request for Proposal was publicly advertised for a professional services contract for the development of the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan, available on OpenGov (an online procurement system) on July 6, 2022; and WHEREAS, on October 19, 2022, the City Council awarded a contract for professional services with GHD, Inc., in the amount of $273,000, approved Resolution 22-129 authorizing the appropriation and transfer of $24,129 to support staff time, contingency and related resources for the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan, and authorized the City Manager to submit a grant application with GHD, Inc. for the Sacramento Area Council of Government’s Green Means Go program; and
WHEREAS, in March 2023, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments awarded the City $650,000 through the Green Means Go Program for the Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan; and WHEREAS, on November 1, 2023, the City Council approved Contract Amendment No. 1 to the professional services contract with GHD, Inc. to complete the Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan; and WHEREAS, on August 15, 2024, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments Board of Directors adopted a revised Green Means Go program budget, implementing an across-theboard 6.2% reduction to all REAP 2 expenditure categories, resulting in a reduction of the Green Means Go award from $650,000 to $609,000; and
WHEREAS, additional funding of $41,000 is needed to fully support the completion of the Sacramento Avenue Corridor Infill & Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing Plan; and WHEREAS, staff is proposing to transfer $41,000 of Measure N – Community Improvement Funds to fully support the Sacramento Avenue Complete Streets Corridor Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, staff is proposing reducing the Green Means Go Grant award by $41,000; and
WHEREAS, there are sufficient funds available in the sources identified to fund the additional appropriations as requested for this project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all information related to this matter, as presented at the public meetings of the City Council identified herein, including any supporting reports by City staff, and any other information provided during public meetings. 1128
Resolution 24-105

Page 2 ends

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento as follows:

1. The City Council hereby approves amendments to the budget for the 2022-23 fiscal year as provided below:

SOURCES
$41,000 111-0000-3110 Measure N – Comm Inv Fund Bal
-$41,000 400-9900-4440/10048-4440 Reduce Green Means Go Grant Rev $41,000 400-9900-4990/10048-4990 Tsfr in from Measure N Comm Inv $0 TOTAL SOURCES
USES
$41,000 111-9375-5950 Tsfr from Measure N-Comm Invest
$0 TOTAL USES
*Note – Interfund transfers are not included in funding sources and uses total to avoid duplication of total project budget and funding.

2. The City Council hereby finds that the facts set forth in the recitals to this Resolution are true and correct and establish the factual basis for the City Council’s adoption of this Resolution.

3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the West Sacramento City Council this 18th day of September, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
1129

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 18, 2024 ITEM # 18
SUBJECT:

WORKSHOP ON PROPOSED SMALL BUSINESS ACCELERATOR PROGRAM INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X ] Staff
[ ] Other
Meaghan Stiles, Economic Development Manager
Economic Development and Housing
ATTACHMENT [ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ X ] Direction [ ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this workshop and report is to provide Council with an overview of the proposed Small Business Accelerator Program and request feedback to inform further refinement of the program.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council receive a workshop presentation and provide feedback on the proposed Small Business Accelerator Program.

BACKGROUND
Small businesses play a tremendous role in the US economy and serve an equally important role in West Sacramento. According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, nationwide, small businesses have generated 64% of net new jobs over the past 15+ years. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, from March 2021 to March 2022, that number was even higher, accounting for 70% of all new job creation during that time.

West Sacramento is home to roughly 2,200 businesses, and an estimated 1,700 of those are small businesses who employ between 1 and 15 people. In the past, the City has assisted small business owners on an informal basis by responding to inquiries on a case-by-case basis. For example, upon request, staff will assist small business owners with questions about navigating the Business License application process, estimating fees or helping to locate and/or occupy a new commercial space. The proposed Small Business Accelerator Program (SBAP) offers a more holistic approach/program designed to systematically grow small businesses in West Sacramento.

In 2018, West Sacramento voters approved Measure N, which called for the enactment of a ¼ percent transactions and use tax (sales tax) to for general revenue purposes. Following voter approval of Measure N, the Council approved a policy to govern its use of its funds. In its Measure N policy, the Council committed to targeting 30 percent of resources over time to “Inclusive Economic Development” activities, examples of which include (but are not limited to) employment training; entrepreneurship programs; affordable housing; and façade loan program for businesses, especially for business located in disadvantaged areas of the City. Business opportunities in older, disadvantaged communities are often challenged by aging infrastructure, ADA and seismic upgrades required in older buildings triggered by tenant improvements and an unwillingness from property owners to contribute to tenant improvements. Small businesses are more likely to experience challenges with security start-up funding and/or traditional lending.

Since then, the Council included “Inclusive Economic Development” in its 2021 Strategic Plan as a Policy action item. Due to several circumstances, including staffing changes and a shift in priorities due to COVID, development and implementation of the SBAP was delayed. However, other related items have moved forward to support small business development, including advancing the equity component of the Retail Cannabis Program and updating the City’s Business License application in 2023, to collect better information about business owners and their businesses, including voluntary demographic, income and other status information questions to help refine small business assistance programs.

ANALYSIS
Inclusive economic development, as it relates to the proposed Small Business Accelerator Program, refers to programs or projects designed specifically to serve businesses either owned by disadvantaged West Sacramento residents, based on race, sex or income status and/or businesses located in disadvantaged areas of the City, as defined by the CalEnviroScreen tool. The California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) 1130
Small Business Accelerator Program Workshop
September 18, 2024

Page 2 ends

has developed an online tool, the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool, (CalEnviroScreen), which uses a suite of 19 indicators to characterize pollution burden (12 indicators) and population characteristics (7 indicators). Each indicator is assigned a score for each census tract in the state based on the most up-to-date data. This score is used to measure the extent to which residents of individual Census tracts are disadvantaged. The CalEnviroScreen map for West Sacramento is included as Attachment 1.

Small Business Accelerator Program Funding Categories
The proposed Small Business Accelerator Program (SBAP) consists of the following four components/funding categories:

1. Small Business Frontage, Site Improvement, and Accessibility Program - When moving to a new space or improving an existing space, small businesses frequently underestimate the cost and time involved to design code-compliant tenant improvements. Aging infrastructure and buildings in the older areas of the City often require significant on- and off-site improvements to comply with ADA, seismic and energy requirements and require the assistance of a knowledgeable and licensed professional. This can create confusion and lag time for both the business and staff and the cost to obtain assistance from professionals is often outside the means of many businesses. This Program component is designed for small businesses with less than 15 employees and less than $3M in annual revenue who own a business located in a geographically disadvantaged area or is a minority- or women-owned business located within the City. The Program provides up to $75,000 for frontage improvements and/or off-site and accessibility improvements needed to comply with California and West Sacramento building codes. For this program, the City Manager would be given the authority to provide additional funds at their discretion. Any business who applies for, and receives, funding would be ineligible for additional funding in this category for a 5-year period.

2. Small Business Permit Fee Assistance Program - Of the four proposed funding categories, the SBAP Permit Fee Assistant Program is the simplest to implement. It does not require providing funds to the applicant, but rather is used internally to reimburse staff time for plan check and review costs associated with improvement project(s). This category is accessible to any small business with less than 15 full time or equivalent employees and less than $3M in annual revenue and provides up to $10,000 towards the cost of City Planning and or Building Permit fees necessary to occupy or expand in a commercial space. Funding would be provided to the Community Development Department directly in the form of a credit to the grantee’s account which can be drawn down as permits are processed. Any costs incurred beyond the $10,000 would be the grantee’s responsibility. Any business who applies for, and receives, funding would be ineligible for additional funding in this category for a 1-year period.

3. Small Business Micro-Grant Program - One of the biggest obstacles facing small business owners seeking to expand is their ability to qualify for and obtain debt financing. Lenders frequently cite poor financial recordkeeping, insufficient collateral (debt to equity ‘gap’) and a history of low credit scores as barriers to small business lending. This funding category is accessible to any small business with less than 15 full-time or equivalent employees and less than $3M in annual revenue and provides up to $20,000 for operating capital to assist with small businesses transitioning to brick-and-mortar facilities or looking to expand into a larger commercial space.

These funds must be used for operating capital (payroll, insurance, lease/mortgage, inventory, marketing, accounting, and/or supplies and the award of these funds must generate at least 1 new full-time job. The intention of this funding category is to encourage expansion and entrepreneurship but has a higher risk to the city. Funds are not required to be repaid if the business closes or remains headquartered in West Sacramento for 5 years following distribution of funds. All funds must be repaid if the business elects to relocate or expand outside the City. For this program, the grantee is eligible for funding one time per business venture. Demonstrated success with past funding awards will be a factor in considering future funding requests from applicants in this category.

4. Small Business Vandalism Relief Program - Many small businesses, regardless of their location in the city, have been victims of vandalism and robbery that result in significant costs incurred just to reopen their business. This program provides up to $5,000/year to any small business that has been a victim of robbery and/or vandalism to cover the cost of broken windows, doors and locks, etching on windows, graffiti, and more. Staff has consulted with the West Sacramento Police Department and will be working to include a requirement to purchase and install a West Sacramento Safe and Secure camera system as part of this program. This will help to deter future acts of vandalism and robbery. Small businesses are eligible for funding in this category no more than once per year.
1131
Small Business Accelerator Program Workshop
September 18, 2024

Page 3 ends

Small business owners often wear many hats, have limited budgets, and encounter challenges in raising capital for projects, expansions, and/or other improvements needed for success. A typical small business does not have the assets required to secure a loan or are considered “risky” by a lender, resulting in higher interest rates, or no lending at all. For these reasons staff recommends that all components of the SBAP apply to all small businesses located in those areas deemed disadvantaged per Attachment 1, which encompasses most of the city located north of the Barge Canal, with the exception of the Bridge District and Pioneer Bluff areas. Businesses wishing to locate or expand outside of this area, but who still meet the business size/revenue requirements (<15 FTE, <$3M annual revenue), are eligible for the Small Business Permit Fee Assistance, Micro-Grant and Vandalism Relief programs only.

The SBACP has many benefits to the city:
 Helps to reduce barriers for small businesses by absorbing many start-up/improvement costs and create visible community improvements;
 Encourages beautification and upgrades in the city’s older commercial areas, which historically have not attracted private investment as easily as newer commercial areas;  Helps to offset the higher costs of improving older buildings/properties; and  City investment in older commercial corridors, including façade, storefront or technology upgrades of under-utilized space, helps to make those spaces more marketable and provides additional location options for small businesses.

Staff is requesting Council feedback on the proposed SBAP components. Based on feedback received, staff will make updates to the proposed SBAC and return to Council with an updated, final proposed program for adoption consideration.

Environmental Considerations
N/A
Commission Recommendation
On May 22, 2024, staff presented information on the SBAP to the Economic Development and Housing Commission. The Commission provided feedback on a number of the program components, which have been incorporated into the proposed SBAP for Council feedback and consideration.

Strategic Plan Integration
Development of programs related to “Inclusive Economic Development” was included as a Policy item in the Council’s 2021 Strategic Plan.

Alternatives
The City Council’s primary alternatives are summarized below:
1) Hear a workshop presentation from staff and provide feedback on the proposed SBAP components/funding; and/or
2) Decline to receive a workshop presentation and direct staff to present at a future Council meeting.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Economic Development and Housing Department in collaboration with Community Development, Capital Projects and Police departments, as well as the City Attorney, Executive Team and the West Sacramento Chamber of Commerce.

Additionally, this grant program has been developed alongside the Retail Cannabis License program, which will include Measure N funding to assist one equity candidate in opening their business. The SBAP will be implemented at such time the equity candidate for the Retail Cannabis Program is identified and funded.

Budget/Cost Impact
Per the Council-approved Measure N policy, 30 percent of annual Measure N revenues, or approximately $1.5 million annually, may be utilized for Inclusive Economic Development projects/activities, including the Equity Retail Cannabis Program candidate. The City Council has already approved an ongoing annual appropriation of $1 million for the SBAP program.

ATTACHMENT
1) CalEnviroScreen Map
1132
Attachment 1 CalEnviroScreen Map
1133

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 18, 2024 ITEM # 19
SUBJECT:

UPDATE ON THE COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY ACTION PLAN
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Steven Rosen, Associate Transportation Planner
Community Development Department
ATTACHMENT [ ] Yes [ X ] No [ X ] Information [ ] Direction [ ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this report is to provide an update to the City Council on the Comprehensive Safety Action Plan and to seek the City Council’s input on street safety in West Sacramento.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council receive staff’s presentation on the progress made toward developing the Comprehensive Safety Action Plan and provide feedback on street safety in West Sacramento.

BACKGROUND
The United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) awarded the City of West Sacramento a grant to develop a “Comprehensive Safety Action Plan.” On January 17, 2024, the City Council awarded a professional services contract to Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. to support the development of the Comprehensive Safety Action Plan.

To take advantage of worldwide momentum against traffic violence, the project has been publicly branded the West Sacramento Vision Zero Action Plan (VZAP). The purpose of the plan is to reduce fatal and serious injuries on West Sacramento’s streets by implementing the “Safe Systems Approach.” The Safe Systems Approach recognizes that fatal and serious injuries are unacceptable, people make mistakes, people are vulnerable, responsibility is shared, safety is proactive, and redundancy is crucial. The Safe Systems Approach seeks to achieve reductions in fatal and serious injuries by improving equity, engineering, education, enforcement, and emergency response.

The Vision Zero Action Plan is being prepared in three broad phases. The first is to analyze existing conditions.

The second is to determine which countermeasures could prevent fatal and serious injury crashes. The third is to set an injury reduction goal, to set a date by which that goal will achieved, and to develop a program of implementing those countermeasures to achieve that goal. This report presents the findings at the end of the first phase.

ANALYSIS
The first phase of preparing the Plan is an analysis of the existing conditions. It produced a Crash Analysis and Community Engagement Summary.

Crash Analysis
The team used the West Sacramento Police Department’s Crossroads traffic report database to analyze all reported crashes during the period 2017-2023. The analysis focused on fatal and serious injury (FSI) crashes to understand when, where, why, and how crashes happen and who suffered the fatal or serious injury.

In the study period, there were 101 FSI crashes. These resulted in 29 deaths and 117 serious injuries. There was not an unusually high or low number of FSI crashes during the COVID-19 quarantine years. FSI crashes happen more often between 6:00pm and midnight than in other periods, and they happen on roads characterized by high traffic speeds, high traffic volumes, and the presence of attractors like retail/service businesses, schools, and parks. Fifty-eight percent of FSI crashes involved vulnerable road users—road users who were not protected by a motor vehicle’s body and crash protection features. They include 29 pedestrians, 17 motorcyclists, and 13 bicyclists. Men and boys are 74% of FSI victims despite being only 49% of residents.

The Crash Analysis identified the cause to which the responding police officer attributed the crash. In 19% of crashes, the behavior was “pedestrian violation,” which commonly meant that the victim was crossing where 1134
Vision Zero Action Plan
September 18, 2024

Page 2 ends

crossing is prohibited or walking along the vehicle travel area. Other common behaviors to which crashes were attributed were disobeying traffic signals and signs, driving under the influence of alcohol or other drugs, rightof-way violation, improper turning, and unsafe speed. The most common type of crash resulting in FSI was a vehicle striking a pedestrian, followed by broadside (“T-bone”), hitting an object, head-on, and rear-end.

Community Engagement Summary
The Community Engagement Summary contains the results of the community engagement process for the first phase of the project. This phase of community engagement had two purposes. The first was to build relationships with the community and to promote the project. The second was to learn from participants’ expertise in the City’s streets.

The engagement plan prioritized engaging communities who have been historically excluded from planning processes, such as multilingual communities, low-income households, youth, older adults, and Black, Indigenous, and Person-of-Color (BIPOC)-identifying individuals. The VZAP team established relationships with the guidance of a ten-member Community Advisory Group (CAG). The team connected with residents by attending the Breathe Bike Rodeo, the Senior Resource Fair, Washington School District’s National Night Out, and the West Sacramento campus of Sacramento City College on a day on which classes were in session.

Outreach has been conducted and shared in English, Spanish, and Russian. The team held two guided active transportation audits and promoted independent active transportation audits. The team also promoted an online community survey through the City’s social media channels and received 491 responses.

Face-to-Face Engagement
The active transportation audits and face-to-face engagement at community events found that attendees were concerned with driver behavior, particularly around school drop-off and pick-up; speeding; and drivers ignoring traffic control devices like traffic lights. Attendees said that they did not feel safe due to high traffic volume and speed. Attendees want to see improvements to roadway design that would calm traffic and improvements to the active transportation network that would address incomplete sidewalks, inadequate bikeways, and that would add shade and other amenities for pedestrians.

Survey
Four hundred and six (406) of the 491 survey respondents live in West Sacramento. One hundred thirty-four (134) of the 491 respondents work in West Sacramento. When asked their single mode of transportation they use most often in West Sacramento, 276 said they were drivers, 143 said they walk, 108 said they ride a bicycle, and 51 said they use public transportation, with other modes being less common.

Sixty-seven percent (67%) of the respondents believe that zero traffic-related deaths in a year is an achievable goal. Approximately 58% would like to achieve zero traffic deaths by 2030.

Fewer than two in ten of respondents believe that West Sacramento’s streets are safe enough for school-age children to walk or bike along, and only about three in ten feel safe crossing West Sacramento’s streets. Almost all respondents were concerned about driver behavior, and nine out of ten were concerned about the design or quality of West Sacramento’s streets.

The survey also produced maps of traffic safety hot-spots where respondents reported they had witnessed or experienced near-misses and unreported crashes that would not appear in crash data and a map of suggested safety improvements.

Next Step
The team will incorporate the City Council’s insights into its analysis of crash risks and continue to refine its designation of high-risk areas. The team will then use the information learned in this phase to identify countermeasures that could prevent FSI crashes, establish the locations that should be targeted for countermeasures so that they would have the maximum effect. The team will also establish potential timelines for implementing the countermeasures and give each timeline an estimated annual budget for initiated countermeasures so that the City Council can set a goal for achieving reduction in FSI crashes that could feasibly be met with sustainable expenditures.

Environmental Considerations
Not Applicable
Commission Recommendation
1135
Vision Zero Action Plan
September 18, 2024

Page 3 ends

CDD staff shared this report with the Transportation, Mobility, & Infrastructure Commission and received input from the commissioners on traffic safety in West Sacramento.

Strategic Plan Integration
This project advances the 2023 Strategic Plan Principles: “Mobility & Connectivity,” in support of providing convenient and sustainable choices for people to get where they are going, “Inclusive & Diverse,” in support of equitable investment and social/environmental justice in the city, and “Core Services & Infrastructure,” in support of sustaining a financially sound city in which everyone feels safe and secure, with quality services and wellmaintained infrastructure.” Alternatives
As an alternative to the recommended action, the City Council could:
1) Decline to hear the presentation; or
2) Direct the presentation to be moved to a later meeting.

Declining to hear the presentation or directing the postpone the presentation to a later meeting will result in the project continuing without City Council feedback at this time.

Coordination and Review
This project includes participation by the Vision Zero Project Development Team (PDT). The PDT consists of representatives of City departments that have responsibility for streets and traffic safety. The PDT includes representatives of Finance, Capital Projects, City Manager’s Office, Community Development, Economic Development and Housing, Fire, Parks & Recreation, Police, and Public Works Operations & Maintenance.

Budget/Cost Impact
The project (CIP 16012) is funded by a $280,000 federal Safe Streets and Roads for All grant, with a commitment of $70,000 local matching funds required. This project was appropriated to the FY 2023/24 Capital Improvement Project budget as approved by Council via Resolution 23-57 for a total appropriation of $70,000 of Fund 107 – One-Time-General Fund. The City Council adopted Resolution 24-13 to add $27,966 to the project budget to allow a 10% contingency for the project. The project has a remaining balance of just over $68,000 at this time.

This report provides an update on the project and has no impact on the budget. No additional funds are being requested at this time.

ATTACHMENT
None
1136

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: September 18, 2024 ITEM # 20

SUBJECT
CONSIDERATION OF THE TREASURER’S QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT ON THE CITY’S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2024 INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Marc Rotteveel, Senior Finance Analyst
Finance Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [X ] Information [ ] Direction [ ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council with the treasurer’s quarterly report on the City’s investment portfolio for the quarter ending June 30, 2024 as outlined by the Government Code 53646(b)(1).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council receive and file the Treasurer’s Quarterly Financial Report on the City’s investment portfolio for the period ending June 30, 2024.

BACKGROUND
All local agencies are required to file regular financial reports with their legislative body on the status of their investment portfolio. One of the roles of the Finance Department is to manage investments of the City to ensure that cash flow needs are met while maximizing the investment portfolio.

The funds invested in the City’s treasury are made up of pooled cash from all Funds in the City’s General Ledger, including funds held in Trust for other agencies (i.e., the Yolo-Sacramento Port District and West Sacramento Flood Control Agency (WSAFCA) JPA). City staff structure investment maturities in such a way to optimize return while ensuring enough liquid funds are available to meet the operating and capital needs of the City and agencies for which the City acts as Treasurer. The pooled cash also includes impact fee revenues collected from developers and set aside until sufficient funds are available to implement the capital projects for which they were collected, and reserve funds for budget stabilization to ensure fiscal stability of the City and its various services to the community.

It should be noted that the majority of the funds held in the City’s treasury are legally restricted and may only be used for the purposes for which they are collected. Moreover, the funds may only be invested in investments permitted by California Government Code 53600 (Code) et. al, and the City’s investment policy.

Under section 53646(b)(1) of the Government Code, the City Treasurer may prepare and transmit a quarterly financial report to the City Council on the City’s investment portfolio. This report includes:

1. The type of investment, issuer, date of maturity, and par and dollar amount invested on all securities, investments and funds held by the City;

2. A current market value as of the date of the report;

3. A stated compliance of the portfolio to the statement of the City’s adopted investment policy, or manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance; and

4. A statement denoting the ability of the local agency to meet its pool’s expenditure requirements for the next six months, or provide an explanation as to why sufficient money shall or may not be available. Once a year, the statement of investment policy is included in the report.

This quarterly report is produced in a format designed to provide stakeholders a broad profile of the City’s Investment Portfolio. While staff are only transmitting portions of the report with key investment results, a full report with additional detail is available upon request. 1137
Treasurer’s Quarterly Financial Report on the City’s Investment Portfolio for the Period Ending June 30, 2024 September 18, 2024

Page 2 ends

ANALYSIS

63.6%

4.2% 6.5% 5.6%

20.1%

58.3%

5.6% 8.8% 7.2%

20.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0-0.50 0.50-1 1-2 2-3 3-5 6/30/2024 3/31/2024
City of West Sacramento Consolidated Maturity Distribution This quarterly financial report summarizes the status of pooled treasury investments as of June 30, 2024. For the quarter-end, the City’s treasury investments comprised investments with a book value of $351,234,900, and a market value of $348,320,705. These figures do not include accrued interest of $792,660, which represents interest income the City has earned but not yet received. The Book Value represents the carrying value of the securities and is based on what the City paid for the security, net of amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts to date, whereas Market Value is a constantly changing amount based on how the securities markets value our portfolio. Market values fluctuate with changes in interest rates, and price has an inverse relationship to interest rates.

The City continues to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), which is the California State Treasurer’s investment pool, and California Asset Management Program (CAMP), a local government investment pool, comprised the City’s most liquid funds, and totaled 26.2% of the investment portfolio. These funds are available to the City within one day.

Additionally, the City held $63.7 million in its operating bank account, which fluctuates depending on cash needs to meet City obligations. Those funds not held in the short-duration investment pools or cash are invested in a diversified portfolio of securities as allowed by code and the City’s investment policy. The portfolio’s duration, sector allocation, and maturity structure are actively managed throughout the quarter. In total, the City’s consolidated investments maintain an average maturity of 405 days.

The City’s portfolio is designed to provide safety and liquidity and continues to meet its goals. City staff and the City’s investment adviser continue to focus on any market dynamics that pose risks to the portfolio.

City of West Sacramento Consolidated Sector Allocation
June 30, 2024 March 31, 2024
ABS

2.5% Agency

6.8%
Cash

4.7%
Corporate

11.5%
LAIF

31.8%
Local Gov
Investment
Pool

1.8%
Money
Market Fund

19.9%
Municipal
Bonds

0.2%
Supranational

2.1%
US Treasury

13.8%
Agency CMBS

4.8%
ABS

2.7% Agency

5.3%
Cash

19.8%
Corporate

9.8%
LAIF

24.5%
Local Gov
Investment
Pool

1.6%
Money
Market Fund

0.3%
Supranational

1.8%
US Treasury

30.0%
Agency CMBS

4.2%

55.5%

0.2%

5.5%

15.1%

6.8%

11.6%

5.2%

55.6%

0.7% 2.8%

16.6%

9.0% 9.1% 6.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0-0.25 0.25-0.50 0.50-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
12/31/2023 9/30/2023
City of West Sacramento Consolidated Maturity Distribution Maturity (Yrs.)
Percentage of Portfolio
1138
Treasurer’s Quarterly Financial Report on the City’s Investment Portfolio for the Period Ending June 30, 2024 September 18, 2024

Page 3 ends

The City’s portfolio of securities (excluding cash, LAIF, and CAMP) maintains its duration in line with its performance-measuring benchmark. Duration is a risk measure indicating the portfolio’s fair value sensitivity to changes in interest rates. As of June 30, 2024, portfolio duration was 2.58 years, which is 103% of its duration target, as measured by the portfolio’s risk and performance-measuring benchmark (which had a duration of 2.51 years). The portfolio continues to maintain strong diversification in sectors, issuers, and maturities.

Economic Outlook
Recent economic data suggests positive but slower growth this year fueled by consumer spending. While the consumer has been resilient, declining savings rates, growing credit card debt, higher delinquencies, and a moderating labor market pose potential headwinds to future economic growth. Inflationary trends are subsiding, but core levels remain above the Fed’s target. The labor market is showing signs of cooling, reflecting an improved balance between supply and demand for workers. Given the cumulative effects of restrictive monetary policy and tighter financial conditions, it is expected the economy will gradually soften and the Fed will begin lowering interest rates at upcoming meetings with pace and magnitude determined by the incoming data.

As expected at the July meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to leave the federal funds rate unchanged at a target range of 5.25-5.50%. Although this was the eighth straight meeting, they left the overnight rate unchanged, they noted that risks to achieving their employment and inflation goals are moving “into better balance”. In addition, the FOMC adjusted their evaluation of the labor market pointing out that job gains have moderated. The market is now pricing in more aggressive easing in the coming months.

Discussion of Performance
Long Term Investment Portfolio
The following is a summary of the City’s holdings by investment type, including each sector’s yield to maturity.

Yield to maturity measures the interest income the City is expected to earn for the coming 12 months, assuming nothing in the portfolio changes. As of June 30, 2024, the weighted average yield to maturity of the City’s consolidated investments was 3.3%:

Investment Type Par Value Market Value Book Value % of
Portfolio
Days to
Maturity
Yield to
Maturity
Asset-backed Securities (ABS) $9,379,778 $9,307,663 $9,356,651 2.7% 1,040 4.2% Agency $19,295,000 $18,580,153 $19,287,684 5.3% 522 1.3% Cash $69,076,803 $69,076,803 $69,076,803 19.8% 1 0.1%
Corporate $35,220,000 $34,055,468 $34,825,774 9.8% 1,212 3.8% LAIF $85,494,697 $85,494,697 $85,494,697 24.5% 1 4.4%
Local Gov Investment Pool $5,638,253 $5,638,253 $5,634,253 1.6% 1 5.4% Money Market Fund $904,468 $904,468 $904,468 0.3% 1 5.2% Supranational $6,775,000 $6,413,202 $6,675,888 1.8% 902 2.2% US Treasury $106,030,000 $104,347,540 $105,281,179 30.0% 526 3.3% Agency CMBS $15,287,000 $14,502,458 $14,697,503 4.2% 1,347 3.2% Grand Total $353,100,999 $348,320,705 $351,234,900 100% 405 3.3% The portfolio’s return comprises interest income as well as fair value appreciation, both of which are a function of movements in interest rates available in the capital markets. Interest income continues to be robust (the investment portfolio of securities is expected to earn was also 3.3% for the next year (up from 3.0% last quarter; when LAIF, CAMP and cash are included the expected earnings are 3.3%). The City’s reinvestment yield (market yield) has been hovering in the 4.9% range.

Short Term Investment Portfolio
Staff continued to maintain a liquidity portfolio comprising money previously held in LAIF, which was providing yields less than 4.6%. Managed as a separate liquidity portfolio, apart from the City’s main portfolio. maturities in this new portfolio go no longer than six months. The yield on this component of the City’s investments have been larger, averaging 5.3% and is valued at approximately $60.8 million. Staff continues to work closely with the City’s investment adviser to diversify the portfolio in order to improve safety, liquidity, and return. In the current quarter, staff will continue to evaluate liquidity needs and, where possible, continue the investment in longer-duration securities.

Environmental Considerations
Not Applicable
1139
Treasurer’s Quarterly Financial Report on the City’s Investment Portfolio for the Period Ending June 30, 2024 September 18, 2024

Page 4 ends

Commission Recommendation
Not applicable
Strategic Plan Integration
The City’s mission includes a City Government that is Financially Sound, and the Council’s goal for achieving a Financially Sound City Government is furthered by investing the City treasury in a manner that ensures safety and liquidity first, and where possible a yield on “excess cash”. The preparation of regular quarterly reports on the City’s investments supports the mission and this goal.

Alternatives
Since this agenda report transmits a quarterly financial report pursuant to Government Code section 53646(b) (1), alternatives have not been presented.

Coordination and Review
Not applicable
Budget/Cost Impact
The investment portfolio, as a whole, earned returns at least consistent with the revenue estimates contained in the budget.

ATTACHMENT

1. Excerpts from Chandler Asset Management Investment Report (June 30, 2024) 1140

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of West Sacramento Cons Portfolio | Account #10677 | As of June 30, 2024 Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes

AGENCY MORTGAGE SECURITIES (CMOS)
Max % (MV) 20.0 4.2 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 30.0 4.2 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 4.7 Compliant

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES (ABS)
Max % (MV) 20.0 2.7 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.4 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

BANKERS' ACCEPTANCES
Max % (MV) 40.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 180 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT PLACEMENT SERVICE (CDARS)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant

COLLATERALIZED BANK DEPOSITS
Max % (MV) 100.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

COLLATERALIZED TIME DEPOSITS (NON-NEGOTIABLE
CD/TD)
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant

COMMERCIAL PAPER
Max % (MV) 40.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 270 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
16 ATTACHMENT 1
1141

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of West Sacramento Cons Portfolio | Account #10677 | As of June 30, 2024 Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes

CORPORATE MEDIUM TERM NOTES
Max % (MV) 30.0 9.8 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.5 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

FDIC INSURED TIME DEPOSITS (NON-NEGOTIABLE CD/
TD)
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant

FEDERAL AGENCIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 5.3 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 30.0 2.9 Compliant
Max Callables (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 3 Compliant

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)
Max % (MV) 100.0 24.5 Compliant

MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.3 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 20.0 0.3 Compliant
Min Rating (AAA by 2) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES, CMOS (NON-AGENCY)
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES (CA, LOCAL AGENCY)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
17 ATTACHMENT 1
1142

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of West Sacramento Cons Portfolio | Account #10677 | As of June 30, 2024 Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES (CA, OTHER STATES)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUTUAL FUNDS
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (AAA by 2) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (NCD)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1 if > FDIC Limit) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

SUPRANATIONAL OBLIGATIONS
Max % (MV) 30.0 1.9 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 1.3 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
U.S. TREASURIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 30.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
18 ATTACHMENT 1
1143

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2024 Benchmark* 6/30/2024
Portfolio
3/31/2024
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 2.68 2.96 2.80
Average Modified Duration 2.51 2.58 2.58
Average Purchase Yield 3.30% 3.04%
Average Market Yield 4.66% 4.88% 4.86%
Average Quality** AA+ AA AA
Total Market Value 128,112,929 127,039,828
*Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US Treasury & Agency Index **The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 19 ATTACHMENT 1
1144
Portfolio Characteristics
Portfolio
Average Modified Duration 0.97Average Coupon Rate 2.32Average Purchase YTM 3.37Average Market YTM 3.89Highest of S&P/Moody's/Fitch AA+Average Final Maturity 1.11Average Life 1.07 Footnote: 1
Account Summary
Portfolio
Beginning Market Value 302,350,604.84Ending Market Value 348,320,705.07Beginning Accrued Balance 3,059,759.48Ending Accrued Balance 2,897,685.98Beginning Total Market Value 305,410,364.31Ending Total Market Value 351,218,391.05Beginning Current Par 307,094,322.03Ending Current Par 353,100,999.00Beginning Book Value 305,567,575.17Ending Book Value 351,234,900.49Beginning Original Cost 305,214,860.98Ending Original Cost 350,374,302.95 Footnotes: 2,3,4,5,6
Top Issuers
Issuer % of Market ValueUnited States 29.96%LAIF 24.54%Cash 18.60%FHLMC 5.62%FNMA 2.87%California Asset Mgmt Program 1.62%International Bank for Recon and Dev 1.26%CASH JP MORGAN CHASE CASH ACCT 0.94%Inter-American Development Bank 0.58%Farm Credit System 0.56% Footnotes: 2,7,8
Sector Allocation Maturity Distribution Credit Quality (Highest of S&P/Moody's/Fitch)Portfolio Summary City of West Sac Cons Agg (362540)04/01/2024 - 06/30/2024 Dated: 07/29/2024 1 ATTACHMENT 1
1145
1: * Weighted by: Market Value + Accrued. 2: * Weighted by: Ending Total Market Value. 3: * Formula Column: Beginning Accrued Balance = [Beginning Due and Accrued]+[Beginning Cash Mutual Fund Dividend Receivable]. 4: * Formula Column: Ending Accrued Balance = [Ending Due and Accrued]+[Ending Cash Mutual Fund Dividend Receivable]. 5: * Formula Column: Beginning Total Market Value = [Beginning Market Value]+([Beginning Due and Accrued]+[Beginning Cash Mutual Fund Dividend Receivable]). 6: * Formula Column: Ending TotalMarket Value = [Ending Market Value]+([Ending Due and Accrued]+[Ending Cash Mutual Fund Dividend Receivable]). 7: * Grouped by: Issuer. 8: * Groups Sorted by: % of Market Value.

Performance Review (Gross)
Portfolio Summary City of West Sac Cons Agg (362540)04/01/2024 - 06/30/2024 Dated: 07/29/2024 2 ATTACHMENT 1
1146

DURATION DISTRIBUTION
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2024 Date 0-.25 .25-.5 .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-7 7+
06/30/2024 0.2% 0.5% 14.3% 19.7% 21.8% 26.7% 16.8% 0.0% 0.0% 03/31/2024 0.6% 0.6% 14.7% 24.6% 14.7% 32.4% 11.3% 0.0% 0.0% 24 ATTACHMENT 1
1147

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
West Sacramento Enhanced Cash | Account #11169 | As of June 30, 2024 6/30/2024
Portfolio
3/31/2024
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 0.13 0.00
Average Modified Duration 0.13 0.00
Average Purchase Yield 5.31% 5.17%
Average Market Yield 5.01% 5.17%
Average Quality** AAA AAA
Total Market Value 60,878,991 60,085,421
*Benchmark: NO BENCHMARK REQUIRED
**The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 27 ATTACHMENT 1
1148

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
City of West Sacramento Reporting Portfolio | Account #10676 | As of June 30, 2024 6/30/2024
Portfolio
3/31/2024
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 0.00 0.00
Average Modified Duration 0.00 0.00
Average Purchase Yield 2.68% 3.84%
Average Market Yield 2.68% 3.84%
Average Quality** AAA AAA
Total Market Value 160,121,445 115,957,128
*Benchmark: NO BENCHMARK REQUIRED
**The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 30 ATTACHMENT 1
1149

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
City of West Sacramento Cons Portfolio | Account #10677 | As of June 30, 2024 6/30/2024
Portfolio
3/31/2024
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 1.11 1.17
Average Modified Duration 0.97 1.04
Average Purchase Yield 3.36% 3.77%
Average Market Yield 3.89% 4.53%
Average Quality** AA+ AA+
Total Market Value 349,113,365 303,082,377
*Benchmark: NO BENCHMARK REQUIRED
**The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 33 ATTACHMENT 1
1150

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Operating Portfolio | Account #10675 | As of June 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
44933LAC7 HART 2021-A A3 0.38 09/15/2025 14,638.15 04/20/2021 14,636.61 99.76 14,603.14 0.01% NA/AAA 1.21

0.39% 14,637.86 4.84% 2.47 (34.71) AAA 0.06
43815GAC3 HAROT 2021-4 A3 0.88 01/21/2026 139,851.38 11/16/2021 139,821.90 97.97 137,005.84 0.11% Aaa/NA 1.56

0.89% 139,841.58 4.64% 34.19 (2,835.74) AAA 0.55
47789QAC4 JDOT 2021-B A3 0.52 03/16/2026 129,384.11 07/13/2021 129,372.57 98.07 126,892.52 0.10% Aaa/NA 1.71

0.52% 129,380.45 4.81% 29.90 (2,487.93) AAA 0.45
89238JAC9 TAOT 2021-D A3 0.71 04/15/2026 135,300.04 11/09/2021 135,297.16 98.00 132,592.61 0.10% NA/AAA 1.79

0.95% 135,299.30 4.44% 42.69 (2,706.69) AAA 0.57
44935FAD6 HART 2021-C A3 0.74 05/15/2026 94,502.58 11/09/2021 94,481.49 98.36 92,952.86 0.07% NA/AAA 1.87

0.75% 94,495.15 4.11% 31.08 (1,542.29) AAA 0.49
43815BAC4 HAROT 2022-1 A3 1.88 05/15/2026 346,748.05 02/15/2022 346,695.90 98.11 340,184.59 0.27% Aaa/AAA 1.87

1.89% 346,727.00 4.63% 289.73 (6,542.41) NA 0.70
05602RAD3 BMWOT 2022-A A3 3.21 08/25/2026 223,998.27 05/10/2022 223,986.63 98.66 221,003.19 0.17% Aaa/AAA 2.15

3.63% 223,993.75 4.97% 119.84 (2,990.56) NA 0.78
47787JAC2 JDOT 2022 A3 0.36 09/15/2026 238,766.39 03/10/2022 238,713.57 98.03 234,069.54 0.18% Aaa/NA 2.21

2.34% 238,742.29 5.46% 246.19 (4,672.75) AAA 0.64
362554AC1 GMCAR 2021-4 A3 0.68 09/16/2026 118,525.77 10/13/2021 118,522.74 97.67 115,767.03 0.09% Aaa/AAA 2.21

0.68% 118,524.92 4.17% 33.58 (2,757.89) NA 0.69
448977AD0 HART 2022-A A3 2.22 10/15/2026 480,835.47 03/09/2022 480,816.96 98.19 472,120.18 0.37% NA/AAA 2.29

2.23% 480,827.13 4.60% 474.42 (8,706.95) AAA 0.78
380146AC4 GMCAR 2022-1 A3 1.26 11/16/2026 120,558.40 01/11/2022 120,547.92 97.78 117,887.64 0.09% NA/AAA 2.38

1.27% 120,553.87 4.27% 63.29 (2,666.23) AAA 0.76
47800AAC4 JDOT 2022-B A3 3.74 02/16/2027 391,669.66 07/12/2022 391,632.26 98.59 386,147.12 0.30% Aaa/NA 2.63

3.77% 391,648.99 5.33% 651.04 (5,501.87) AAA 0.88
44934FAD7 HALST 24B A3 5.41 05/17/2027 495,000.00 05/14/2024 494,986.24 100.22 496,078.36 0.39% NA/AAA 2.88

5.41% 494,986.75 5.36% 1,190.20 1,091.61 AAA 1.69
02582JJT8 AMXCA 2022-2 A 05/17/2027 940,000.00 05/17/2022 939,792.07 98.21 923,174.00 0.73% NA/AAA 0.87

3.42% 939,913.71 5.54% 1,416.27 (16,739.71) AAA 0.92
47800BAC2 JDOT 2022-C A3 5.09 06/15/2027 715,000.00 10/12/2022 714,944.52 99.64 712,446.81 0.56% Aaa/NA 2.96

3.29% 714,967.55 5.50% 1,617.49 (2,520.75) AAA 1.05
41 ATTACHMENT 1
1151

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
36269WAD1 GMALT 2024-2 A3 5.39 07/20/2027 460,000.00 05/07/2024 459,973.27 100.29 461,332.67 0.36% NA/AAA 3.05

5.85% 459,974.33 5.30% 757.59 1,358.34 AAA 1.71
02582JJV3 AMXCA 2022-3 A 3.75 08/15/2025 1,000,000.00 11/03/2022 960,000.00 98.20 982,006.60 0.77% Aaa/NA 1.13

5.41% 977,662.31 5.48% 1,666.67 4,344.29 AAA 1.15
58770JAD6 MBALT 2024-A A3 5.32 01/18/2028 335,000.00 05/17/2024 334,960.81 100.29 335,959.24 0.26% Aaa/NA 3.55

5.73% 334,961.96 5.25% 792.09 997.28 AAA 2.00
161571HT4 CHAIT 2023-1 A 5.16 09/15/2028 1,350,000.00 09/07/2023 1,349,625.78 100.26 1,353,446.28 1.06% NR/AAA 4.21

5.17% 1,349,685.18 5.11% 3,096.00 3,761.10 AAA 2.03
437930AC4 HONDO-242-A3 5.27 11/20/2028 435,000.00 05/14/2024 434,947.15 100.27 436,174.11 0.34% NA/AAA 4.39

5.27% 434,948.47 5.21% 827.83 1,225.64 AAA 2.06
096919AD7 BMWOT 2024-A A3 5.18 02/26/2029 570,000.00 06/04/2024 569,913.42 100.10 570,563.10 0.45% Aaa/AAA 4.66

5.18% 569,914.43 5.21% 1,640.33 648.68 NA 2.10
05522RDJ4 BACCT 2024-1 A 4.93 03/15/2029 645,000.00 06/06/2024 644,963.82 100.04 645,255.81 0.51% Aaa/AAA 4.71

4.93% 644,964.20 4.99% 1,589.93 291.61 NA 2.61
9,338,632.78 99.24 9,307,663.25 7.31% Aaa/AAA 2.85
Total ABS 9,379,778.27 4.16% 9,356,651.18 5.17% 16,612.83 (48,987.92) AAA 1.42 AGENCY
3130AQF40 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 1.0 400,000.00 12/21/2021 399,740.00 97.97 391,886.56 0.31% Aaa/AA+ 0.47 12/20/2024 1.02% 399,959.12 5.40% 122.22 (8,072.56) AA+ 0.46 3135G0X24 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 2,170,000.00 -- 2,216,515.70 98.13 2,129,513.20 1.67% Aaa/AA+ 0.52 ASSOCIATION 1.625 01/07/2025 1.18% 2,175,006.96 5.31% 17,043.54 (45,493.76) AA+ 0.50 3137EAEP0 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 2,280,000.00 02/13/2020 2,278,244.40 97.70 2,227,540.35 1.75% Aaa/AA+ 0.62 CORP 1.5 02/12/2025 1.52% 2,279,782.60 5.34% 13,205.00 (52,242.25) AA+ 0.60 3135G03U5 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 1,795,000.00 04/22/2020 1,791,302.30 96.43 1,730,843.49 1.36% Aaa/AA+ 0.81 ASSOCIATION 0.625 04/22/2025 0.67% 1,794,401.96 5.18% 2,150.26 (63,558.47) AA+ 0.79 3135G04Z3 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 2,100,000.00 -- 2,098,880.25 95.66 2,008,944.00 1.58% Aaa/AA+ 0.96 ASSOCIATION 0.5 06/17/2025 0.51% 2,099,814.31 5.17% 408.33 (90,870.31) AA+ 0.94 3137EAEU9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 1,200,000.00 07/21/2020 1,194,024.00 95.27 1,143,296.12 0.90% Aaa/AA+ 1.06 CORP 0.375 07/21/2025 0.48% 1,198,738.62 5.01% 2,000.00 (55,442.49) AA+ 1.03 3135G05X7 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 2,150,000.00 -- 2,136,456.52 94.81 2,038,421.84 1.60% Aaa/AA+ 1.15 ASSOCIATION 0.375 08/25/2025 0.51% 2,146,666.69 5.07% 2,821.88 (108,244.85) AA+ 1.12 42 ATTACHMENT 1
1152

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3137EAEX3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 1,800,000.00 -- 1,794,640.80 94.51 1,701,214.22 1.34% Aaa/AA+ 1.23 CORP 0.375 09/23/2025 0.44% 1,798,664.15 5.03% 1,837.50 (97,449.93) AA+ 1.20 3135G06G3 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 2,200,000.00 -- 2,193,135.20 94.22 2,072,939.66 1.63% Aaa/AA+ 1.36 ASSOCIATION 0.5 11/07/2025 0.56% 2,198,136.46 4.97% 1,650.00 (125,196.80) AA+ 1.32 880591EZ1 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 1,200,000.00 05/01/2023 1,203,612.00 97.82 1,173,840.89 0.92% Aaa/AA+ 3.71

3.875 03/15/2028 3.81% 1,202,747.07 4.52% 13,691.67 (28,906.18) AA+ 3.37 3133EPME2 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 2,000,000.00 06/07/2023 1,992,080.00 98.09 1,961,712.88 1.54% Aaa/AA+ 3.94 FUNDING CORP 3.875 06/08/2028 3.96% 1,993,766.31 4.41% 4,951.39 (32,053.43) AA+ 3.60 19,298,631.17 96.32 18,580,153.20 14.59% Aaa/AA+ 1.43
Total Agency 19,295,000.00 1.30% 19,287,684.24 5.03% 59,881.79 (707,531.04) AA+ 1.35

AGENCY CMBS
3137BSP72 FHMS K-058 A2 2.653 08/25/2026 500,000.00 11/12/2021 528,808.59 95.24 476,218.30 0.37% Aaa/AA+ 2.15

1.36% 512,760.96 4.99% 1,105.42 (36,542.66) AAA 2.00
3137BSRE5 FHMS K-059 A2 3.12 09/25/2026 1,000,000.00 02/18/2022 1,042,812.50 96.11 961,131.30 0.75% Aaa/AAA 2.24

2.08% 1,020,550.00 4.99% 2,600.00 (59,418.70) AAA 2.02
3137BTAC5 FHMS K-060 A2 3.3 10/25/2026 1,000,000.00 10/31/2022 946,875.00 96.24 962,364.70 0.76% Aaa/AA+ 2.32

4.74% 969,419.64 4.98% 2,750.00 (7,054.94) AAA 2.16
3137FBBX3 FHMS K-068 A2 3.244 08/25/2027 2,000,000.00 -- 1,887,460.94 95.27 1,905,302.00 1.50% Aaa/AA+ 3.15

4.54% 1,927,400.59 4.87% 5,406.67 (22,098.59) AA+ 2.86
3137FBU79 FHMS K-069 A2 3.187 09/25/2027 1,500,000.00 04/13/2023 1,446,093.75 95.02 1,425,241.80 1.12% Aaa/AAA 3.24

4.08% 1,460,945.82 4.89% 3,983.75 (35,704.02) AA+ 2.89
3137F4D41 FHMS K-074 A2 3.6 01/25/2028 1,000,000.00 03/14/2023 966,757.81 95.85 958,528.40 0.75% Aaa/AA+ 3.57

4.36% 975,718.58 4.87% 3,000.00 (17,190.18) AAA 3.20
3137FJEH8 FHMS K-081 A2 3.9 08/25/2028 3,530,000.00 -- 3,369,780.09 96.48 3,405,810.01 2.67% Aaa/AA+ 4.15

4.94% 3,395,301.36 4.82% 11,472.50 10,508.65 AAA 3.71
3137FJKE8 FHMS K-082 A2 3.92 09/25/2028 1,000,000.00 11/28/2023 964,531.25 96.54 965,394.20 0.76% Aaa/AA+ 4.24

4.74% 968,883.12 4.82% 3,266.67 (3,488.92) AAA 3.74
3137H5YC5 FHMS K-748 A2 2.26 01/25/2029 2,237,000.00 03/25/2024 2,014,523.35 89.66 2,005,614.12 1.58% Aaa/AA+ 4.57

4.61% 2,026,670.06 4.84% 4,213.02 (21,055.95) AAA 4.15
3137FLMV3 FHMS K-090 A2 3.422 02/25/2029 1,520,000.00 03/18/2024 1,434,975.00 94.53 1,436,852.81 1.13% Aaa/AAA 4.66

4.70% 1,439,852.70 4.74% 4,334.53 (2,999.89) AA+ 4.14
43 ATTACHMENT 1
1153

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
14,602,618.28 94.92 14,502,457.63 11.39% Aaa/AA+ 3.69
Total Agency CMBS 15,287,000.00 4.36% 14,697,502.84 4.86% 42,132.55 (195,045.20) AAA 3.32 CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 80,851.36 -- 80,851.36 1.00 80,851.36 0.06% Aaa/AAA 0.00

0.00% 80,851.36 0.00% 0.00 0.00 AAA 0.00
80,851.36 1.00 80,851.36 0.06% Aaa/AAA 0.00
Total Cash 80,851.36 0.00% 80,851.36 0.00% 0.00 0.00 AAA 0.00

CORPORATE
06367WB85 BANK OF MONTREAL 1.85 939,000.00 07/23/2021 973,573.98 97.00 910,832.96 0.72% A2/A- 0.84 05/01/2025 0.86% 946,649.56 5.57% 2,895.25 (35,816.60) AA- 0.81 40139LBC6 GUARDIAN LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING 1,100,000.00 -- 1,088,890.00 93.92 1,033,118.42 0.81% Aa1/AA+ 1.45

0.875 12/10/2025 1.12% 1,096,166.38 5.30% 561.46 (63,047.96) NA 1.40 66815L2A6 NORTHWESTERNMUTUAL GLOBAL 650,000.00 12/06/2021 632,755.50 93.54 608,038.41 0.48% Aaa/AA+ 1.54 FUNDING 0.8 01/14/2026 1.46% 643,530.44 5.22% 2,412.22 (35,492.03) AAA 1.49 46647PBK1 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.083 334,000.00 05/20/2021 346,468.22 97.11 324,334.21 0.25% A1/A- 1.81 04/22/2026 0.97% 336,972.97 6.58% 1,333.47 (12,638.76) AA- 0.78 023135BX3 AMAZON.COM INC 1.0 05/12/2026 1,655,000.00 05/10/2021 1,647,850.40 93.03 1,539,686.65 1.21% A1/AA 1.87

1.09% 1,652,337.50 4.95% 2,252.64 (112,650.85) AA- 1.81 91324PEC2 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 1.15 275,000.00 -- 275,889.15 92.96 255,631.63 0.20% A2/A+ 1.87 05/15/2026 1.08% 275,332.01 5.14% 404.10 (19,700.38) A 1.81 89236TJK2 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 1.125 1,130,000.00 06/15/2021 1,129,502.80 92.61 1,046,465.37 0.82% A1/A+ 1.97 06/18/2026 1.13% 1,129,804.77 5.12% 459.06 (83,339.40) A+ 1.90 06051GJD2 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.319 1,000,000.00 -- 1,002,640.00 95.82 958,209.16 0.75% A1/A- 1.97 06/19/2026 1.24% 1,000,729.56 6.18% 439.67 (42,520.40) AA- 0.94 57629WDE7 MASSMUTUAL GLOBAL FUNDING II 772,000.00 08/10/2021 771,785.72 92.24 712,095.16 0.56% Aa3/AA+ 2.04

1.2 07/16/2026 1.21% 771,911.26 5.25% 4,246.00 (59,816.10) AA+ 1.96 58989V2D5 MET TOWER GLOBAL FUNDING 1.25 585,000.00 09/07/2021 584,461.80 91.68 536,305.30 0.42% Aa3/AA- 2.21 09/14/2026 1.27% 584,762.74 5.30% 2,173.44 (48,457.44) AA- 2.12 44 ATTACHMENT 1
1154

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
931142ER0 WALMART INC 1.05 09/17/2026 265,000.00 09/08/2021

1.09%
264,499.15
264,778.37

92.18 4.81%
244,286.83
803.83

0.19%
(20,491.54)
Aa2/AA
AA

2.22 2.14
26442CAS3 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS LLC 2.95
12/01/2026
1,355,000.00 10/28/2022

4.88%
1,258,727.25
1,297,985.35

95.27 5.05%
1,290,957.67
3,331.04

1.01%
(7,027.68)
Aa3/A
WR

2.42 2.29
59217GER6 METROPOLITAN LIFE GLOBAL
FUNDING I 1.875 01/11/2027
845,000.00 01/03/2022

1.90%
844,036.70
844,512.55

92.28 5.17%
779,724.65
7,481.77

0.61%
(64,787.90)
Aa3/AAAA2.53

2.40 61747YEZ4 MORGAN STANLEY 5.05 01/28/2027 610,000.00 01/17/2023

4.99%
611,063.70
610,556.12

99.43 5.89%
606,550.58
13,092.13

0.48%
(4,005.53)
A1/AA+2.58

1.47 808513BY0 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP 2.45
03/03/2027
725,000.00 03/01/2022

2.46%
724,796.70
724,890.12

93.27 5.18%
676,178.54
5,822.15

0.53%
(48,711.58)
A2/AA2.67

2.52 084664CZ2 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCE
CORP 2.3 03/15/2027
1,225,000.00 03/07/2022

2.30%
1,224,767.25
1,224,874.19

93.74 4.79%
1,148,281.84
8,295.97

0.90%
(76,592.35)
Aa2/AA
A+

2.71 2.56
06051GHT9 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.559
04/23/2027
750,000.00 --

4.29%
726,688.38
736,096.69

96.70 5.91%
725,228.29
5,041.92

0.57%
(10,868.40)
A1/AAA2.81

1.71 665859AW4 NORTHERN TRUST CORP 4.0
05/10/2027
455,000.00 05/05/2022

4.03%
454,262.90
454,578.97

97.61 4.90%
444,143.78
2,578.33

0.35%
(10,435.20)
A2/A+
A+

2.86 2.65
91324PEG3 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 3.7
05/15/2027
465,000.00 05/17/2022

3.69%
465,220.50
465,125.36

96.77 4.92%
449,990.45
2,198.42

0.35%
(15,134.91)
A2/A+
A

2.87 2.67
61747YEC5 MORGAN STANLEY 1.512
07/20/2027
750,000.00 10/28/2022

5.92%
637,425.00
677,172.74

92.45 5.70%
693,377.93
5,071.50

0.54%
16,205.19
A1/AA+3.05

1.96 14913R3A3 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORP 3.6 08/12/2027
1,000,000.00 11/02/2022

5.05%
938,730.00
960,009.19

96.24 4.91%
962,448.52
13,900.00

0.76%
2,439.33
A2/A
A+

3.12 2.86
756109BG8 REALTY INCOME CORP 3.95
08/15/2027
1,425,000.00 --

5.41%
1,337,997.25
1,368,055.07

96.42 5.20%
1,374,009.97
21,264.17

1.08%
5,954.90
A3/ANA3.13

2.85 57636QAW4 MASTERCARD INC 4.875 03/09/2028 775,000.00 03/06/2023

4.90%
774,248.25
774,445.75
100.53

4.71%
779,140.91
11,754.17

0.61%
4,695.16
Aa3/A+
NA

3.69 3.23
63743HFG2 NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES
COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORP 4.8
03/15/2028
900,000.00 04/10/2023

4.39%
915,975.00
911,949.66

99.22 5.03%
892,984.77
12,720.00

0.70%
(18,964.89)
A2/AA3.71

3.31 74340XCG4 PROLOGIS LP 4.875 06/15/2028 1,600,000.00 --

5.02%
1,589,759.50
1,591,773.82

99.51 5.01%
1,592,170.67
3,466.67

1.25%
396.86
A3/A
NA

3.96 3.55
45 ATTACHMENT 1
1155

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
24422EXB0 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.95 1,000,000.00 09/12/2023 995,310.00 100.10 1,001,049.59 0.79% A1/A 4.04 07/14/2028 5.06% 996,083.25 4.92% 22,962.50 4,966.34 A+ 3.54 89115A2U5 TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 5.523 1,400,000.00 -- 1,404,594.00 101.24 1,417,393.35 1.11% A1/A 4.05 07/17/2028 5.45% 1,403,754.16 5.18% 35,224.47 13,639.19 AA- 3.51 78016HZS2 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 5.2 1,000,000.00 08/07/2023 995,280.00 100.66 1,006,565.95 0.79% A1/A 4.09 08/01/2028 5.31% 996,128.51 5.02% 21,666.67 10,437.44 AA- 3.57 74456QBX3 PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRICAND GAS 1,000,000.00 12/07/2023 953,250.00 95.35 953,501.72 0.75% A1/A 4.17 CO 3.65 09/01/2028 4.77% 958,748.41 4.90% 12,166.67 (5,246.69) WR 3.76 91324PDP4 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 3.875 1,000,000.00 12/12/2023 960,560.00 95.81 958,095.85 0.75% A2/A+ 4.46 12/15/2028 4.77% 964,855.87 4.93% 1,722.22 (6,760.02) A 4.02 66815L2Q1 NORTHWESTERNMUTUAL GLOBAL 800,000.00 -- 801,507.56 98.99 791,933.18 0.62% Aaa/AA+ 4.53 FUNDING 4.71 01/10/2029 4.67% 801,364.81 4.96% 17,898.00 (9,431.62) AAA 3.94 57629W5B2 MASSMUTUAL GLOBAL FUNDING II 800,000.00 01/09/2024 799,896.00 99.27 794,148.76 0.62% Aa3/AA+ 4.55

4.85 01/17/2029 4.85% 799,905.45 5.03% 17,675.56 (5,756.69) AA+ 3.95 46647PAM8 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.509 1,300,000.00 01/18/2024 1,227,577.00 94.57 1,229,361.52 0.97% A1/A- 4.57 01/23/2029 5.07% 1,235,508.33 5.48% 20,020.79 (6,146.81) AA- 3.24 69371RS80 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 4.6 1,250,000.00 04/09/2024 1,236,725.00 98.90 1,236,295.11 0.97% A1/A+ 4.59 01/31/2029 4.85% 1,237,337.34 4.87% 24,118.06 (1,042.23) NA 4.01 17275RBR2 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.85 685,000.00 02/21/2024 684,760.25 99.98 684,879.15 0.54% A1/AA- 4.66 02/26/2029 4.86% 684,776.78 4.85% 11,535.59 102.37 NA 4.06 64952WFG3 NEW YORK LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING 650,000.00 06/03/2024 648,752.00 99.68 647,924.95 0.51% Aaa/AA+ 4.93

5.0 06/06/2029 5.04% 648,769.09 5.07% 2,256.94 (844.13) AAA 4.31 24422EXT1 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.85 750,000.00 06/07/2024 743,835.00 99.68 747,573.47 0.59% A1/A 4.95 06/11/2029 5.04% 743,902.52 4.92% 2,020.83 3,670.95 A+ 4.34 341081GT8 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO 5.15 1,000,000.00 06/13/2024 1,013,864.81 100.84 1,008,375.98 0.79% Aa2/A+ 4.96 06/15/2029 4.82% 1,013,754.71 4.96% 4,005.56 (5,378.73) AA- 4.19 437076DC3 HOME DEPOT INC 4.75 06/25/2029 1,000,000.00 06/20/2024 995,870.00 99.42 994,176.85 0.78% A2/A 4.99

4.84% 995,883.57 4.88% 791.67 (1,706.72) A 4.39
34,683,796.72 96.78 34,055,468.11 26.75% A1/A 3.32
Total Corporate 35,220,000.00 3.82% 34,825,773.95 5.14% 328,064.88 (770,305.84) A+ 2.87 46 ATTACHMENT 1
1156

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration

MONEY MARKET
FUND
X9USDDGCM DREYFUS GVT CM INST 112,990.55 --

5.19%
112,990.55
112,990.55

1.00 5.19%
112,990.55

0.00 0.09%

0.00 Aaa/
AAAm
NA

0.00 0.00
Total Money Market
Fund 112,990.55 5.19%
112,990.55
112,990.55

1.00 5.19%
112,990.55

0.00 0.09%

0.00 Aaa/
AAAm
NA

0.00 0.00

SUPRANATIONAL
459058JL8 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR

RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM

0.5 10/28/2025
2,150,000.00 --

0.60%
2,140,429.05
2,147,304.02

94.26 5.02%
2,026,532.55
1,881.25

1.59%
(120,771.47)
Aaa/AAA
NA

1.33 1.29
4581X0DV7 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT
BANK 0.875 04/20/2026
2,175,000.00 04/13/2021

0.97%
2,165,038.50
2,171,410.37

93.15 4.88%
2,025,993.82
3,753.39

1.59%
(145,416.55)
Aaa/AAA
NA

1.80 1.75
459058KT9 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR

RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM

3.5 07/12/2028
2,450,000.00 08/25/2023

4.56%
2,337,814.50
2,357,174.22

96.35 4.50%
2,360,675.33
40,254.86

1.85%
3,501.10
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.03 3.65
Total Supranational 6,775,000.00 2.17%
6,643,282.05
6,675,888.61

94.68 4.79%
6,413,201.70
45,889.50

5.04%
(262,686.91)
Aaa/AAA
NA

2.47 2.30

US TREASURY
912828ZC7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.125
02/28/2025
2,000,000.00 03/18/2020

0.81%
2,030,859.38
2,004,132.80

97.33 5.24%
1,946,542.96
7,520.38

1.53%
(57,589.84)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.67 0.65
912828ZF0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.5
03/31/2025
2,000,000.00 05/28/2020

0.35%
2,014,140.63
2,002,184.72

96.57 5.21%
1,931,425.78
2,513.66

1.52%
(70,758.94)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.75 0.73
912828XB1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.125
05/15/2025
1,000,000.00 04/06/2022

2.77%
980,742.19
994,599.66

97.41 5.19%
974,101.56
2,713.99

0.77%
(20,498.10)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.87 0.85
91282CAB7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.25
07/31/2025
1,100,000.00 03/12/2021

0.71%
1,077,828.13
1,094,522.90

94.96 5.08%
1,044,613.28
1,148.35

0.82%
(49,909.61)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.08 1.06
91282CAT8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.25
10/31/2025
400,000.00 03/12/2021

0.78%
390,265.63
397,196.55

93.98 4.97%
375,921.88
168.48

0.30%
(21,274.67)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.34 1.30
47 ATTACHMENT 1
1157

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CFW6 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.5
11/15/2025
1,400,000.00 11/10/2022

4.26%
1,409,132.81
1,404,183.10

99.39 4.96%
1,391,523.43
8,046.20

1.09%
(12,659.66)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.38 1.31
91282CAZ4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.375
11/30/2025
1,250,000.00 03/26/2021

0.76%
1,227,587.89
1,243,212.03

93.82 4.94%
1,172,705.08
397.03

0.92%
(70,506.96)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.42 1.38
91282CCW9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.75
08/31/2026
530,000.00 09/23/2021

0.90%
526,252.73
528,355.11

91.97 4.69%
487,434.38
1,328.60

0.38%
(40,920.74)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.17 2.10
91282CCZ2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.875
09/30/2026
1,060,000.00 10/18/2021

1.18%
1,044,141.41
1,052,794.74

92.04 4.64%
975,572.65
2,331.42

0.77%
(77,222.09)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.25 2.18
91282CDG3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.125
10/31/2026
1,060,000.00 11/15/2021

1.25%
1,053,540.63
1,056,957.77

92.29 4.65%
978,222.65
2,009.10

0.77%
(78,735.12)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.34 2.25
912828YQ7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.625
10/31/2026
2,400,000.00 11/02/2022

4.41%
2,156,250.00
2,257,561.73

93.39 4.65%
2,241,281.26
6,570.65

1.76%
(16,280.47)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.34 2.24
91282CET4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.625
05/31/2027
600,000.00 06/13/2022

3.40%
578,718.75
587,503.72

94.84 4.53%
569,015.63
1,334.02

0.45%
(18,488.10)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.92 2.76
91282CEW7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.25
06/30/2027
1,500,000.00 --

3.41%
1,490,273.44
1,493,682.64

96.49 4.51%
1,447,324.22
132.47

1.14%
(46,358.42)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.00 2.82
91282CFB2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.75
07/31/2027
1,180,000.00 --

2.99%
1,166,739.07
1,171,753.43

94.95 4.52%
1,120,446.88
13,550.55

0.88%
(51,306.55)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.08 2.88
91282CFH9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.125
08/31/2027
3,500,000.00 --

3.28%
3,474,796.89
3,483,954.82

95.94 4.51%
3,357,812.50
36,557.40

2.64%
(126,142.32)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.17 2.94
91282CFU0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
10/31/2027
2,400,000.00 11/03/2022

4.41%
2,368,968.75
2,379,272.76

98.88 4.49%
2,373,093.74
16,679.35

1.86%
(6,179.02)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.34 3.06
91282CGC9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.875
12/31/2027
700,000.00 01/25/2023

3.57%
709,679.69
706,872.58

98.08 4.47%
686,574.22

73.71 0.54%
(20,298.36)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.50 3.23
91282CGH8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.5
01/31/2028
1,000,000.00 03/14/2023

3.90%
982,578.13
987,195.27

96.85 4.46%
968,476.56
14,615.38

0.76%
(18,718.71)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.59 3.27
91282CGP0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
02/29/2028
2,900,000.00 02/23/2023

4.16%
2,879,269.53
2,884,818.08

98.48 4.45%
2,855,820.30
38,771.74

2.24%
(28,997.78)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.67 3.33
91282CHA2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.5
04/30/2028
2,100,000.00 --

3.55%
2,095,664.07
2,096,607.15

96.73 4.44%
2,031,257.80
12,383.15

1.60%
(65,349.35)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.84 3.52
91282CHE4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
05/31/2028
1,500,000.00 06/14/2023

4.00%
1,475,214.84
1,480,385.84

97.15 4.42%
1,457,285.16
4,605.53

1.14%
(23,100.68)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.92 3.59
48 ATTACHMENT 1
1158

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CHX2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
08/31/2028
550,000.00 09/25/2023

4.62%
544,199.22
545,097.84

99.88 4.40%
549,355.47
8,042.63

0.43%
4,257.62
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.17 3.72
91282CJF9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.875
10/31/2028
750,000.00 10/27/2023

4.79%
752,841.80
752,462.27
101.87

4.40%
764,003.91
6,159.99

0.60%
11,541.64
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.34 3.85
91282CJN2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
11/30/2028
900,000.00 12/28/2023

3.83%
921,937.50
919,680.30

99.98 4.38%
899,859.38
3,335.04

0.71%
(19,820.93)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.42 3.96
91282CJR3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.75
12/31/2028
2,150,000.00 --

3.98%
2,127,462.89
2,129,581.04

97.45 4.38%
2,095,074.21
219.09

1.65%
(34,506.83)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.50 4.09
91282CJW2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.0
01/31/2029
3,100,000.00 --

4.30%
3,058,937.50
3,061,852.83

98.46 4.37%
3,052,289.08
51,780.22

2.40%
(9,563.75)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.59 4.07
91282CKG5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
03/31/2029
2,500,000.00 --

4.59%
2,448,730.47
2,450,899.10

98.98 4.36%
2,474,511.73
25,922.13

1.94%
23,612.62
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.75 4.23
91282CKP5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.625
04/30/2029
4,000,000.00 --

4.47%
4,027,509.77
4,026,768.80
101.15

4.36%
4,045,937.52
31,168.48

3.18%
19,168.72
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.83 4.27
Total US Treasury 45,530,000.00 3.36%
45,014,263.74
45,194,089.59

97.29 4.59%
44,267,483.19
300,078.75

34.77%
(926,606.40)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.20 2.92
Total Portfolio 131,680,620.18 3.30%
129,775,066.65
130,231,432.31

96.61 4.88%
127,320,268.99
792,660.30
100.00%
(2,911,163.32)
Aa2/AAAA2.96

2.58 Total Market Value +
Accrued 128,112,929.29
49 ATTACHMENT 1
1159

HOLDINGS REPORT
West Sacramento Enhanced Cash | Account #11169 | As of June 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 7,455.91 --

0.00%
7,455.91
7,455.91

1.00 0.00%
7,455.91

0.00 0.01%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Cash 7,455.91 0.00%
7,455.91
7,455.91

1.00 0.00%
7,455.91

0.00 0.01%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00

MONEY MARKET
FUND
X9USDDGCM DREYFUS GVT CM INST 791,477.65 --

5.21%
791,477.65
791,477.65

1.00 5.21%
791,477.65

0.00 1.30%

0.00 Aaa/
AAAm
NA

0.00 0.00
Total Money Market
Fund 791,477.65 5.21%
791,477.65
791,477.65

1.00 5.21%
791,477.65

0.00 1.30%

0.00 Aaa/
AAAm
NA

0.00 0.00

US TREASURY
912797KN6 UNITED STATES TREASURY
07/09/2024
30,000,000.00 06/27/2024

5.29%
29,952,218.75
29,965,250.00

99.88 4.71%
29,965,183.20

0.00 49.22%
(66.80)
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.02 0.02
912797KM8 UNITED STATES TREASURY
09/26/2024
30,500,000.00 04/01/2024

5.34%
29,730,638.77
30,121,839.40

98.74 5.30%
30,114,874.06

0.00 49.47%
(6,965.34)
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.24 0.24
Total US Treasury 60,500,000.00 5.31%
59,682,857.52
60,087,089.40

99.31 5.01%
60,080,057.26

0.00 98.69%
(7,032.14)
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.13 0.13
Total Portfolio 61,298,933.56 5.31%
60,481,791.08
60,886,022.96

98.02 5.01%
60,878,990.82

0.00 100.00%
(7,032.14)
Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.13 0.13
Total Market Value +
Accrued 60,878,990.82
50 ATTACHMENT 1
1160

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of West Sacramento Reporting Portfolio | Account #10676 | As of June 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 1,003,330.57 --

0.00%
1,003,330.57
1,003,330.57

1.00 0.00%
1,003,330.57

0.00 0.63%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
86723G1$8 Suncrest Bank 1,047,638.18 --

0.02%
1,047,638.18
1,047,638.18

1.00 0.02%
1,047,638.18

0.00 0.65%

0.00 NA/NA
NA

0.00 0.00
90JPMC$04 CASH JP MORGAN CHASE CASH
ACCT
3,257,153.78 --

2.50%
3,257,153.78
3,257,153.78

1.00 2.50%
3,257,153.78

0.00 2.03%

0.00 NA/NA
NA

0.00 0.00
90BOFA$00 Cash BOA 63,680,373.19 --

0.00%
63,680,373.19
63,680,373.19

1.00 0.00%
63,680,373.19

0.00 39.77%

0.00 NA/NA
NA

0.00 0.00
Total Cash 68,988,495.72 0.12%
68,988,495.72
68,988,495.72

1.00 0.12%
68,988,495.72

0.00 43.09%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
LAIF
90LAIF$00 Local Agency Investment Fund State
Pool
85,494,696.87 --

4.56%
85,494,696.83
85,494,696.83

1.00 4.56%
85,494,696.87

0.00 53.39%

0.04 NA/NA
NA

0.00 0.00
Total LAIF 85,494,696.87 4.56%
85,494,696.83
85,494,696.83

1.00 4.56%
85,494,696.87

0.00 53.39%

0.04 NA/NA
NA

0.00 0.00

LOCAL GOV

INVESTMENT POOL
90CAMP$00 CAMP 5,638,252.67 --

5.44%
5,634,252.67
5,634,252.67

1.00 5.44%
5,638,252.67

0.00 3.52%
4,000.00
NA/AAAm
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Local Gov
Investment Pool 5,638,252.67 5.44%
5,634,252.67
5,634,252.67

1.00 5.44%
5,638,252.67

0.00 3.52%
4,000.00
NA/
AAAm
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Portfolio 160,121,445.26 2.68%
160,117,445.22
160,117,445.22

1.00 2.68%
160,121,445.26

0.00 100.00%
4,000.04
Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Market Value +
Accrued 160,121,445.26
51 ATTACHMENT 1
1161
1 From: Guerrero, Martha <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2024 4:18 PM
To: Laurel, Aaron <[email protected]>; Berlin, Amanda <[email protected]>; Robinson, Jon <[email protected]>
Subject: Fw: City Council Breast Cancer Awareness Proclamation request from Thriving Pink Hello Aaron,
Submitting this request for City Council Proclamation recognizing Breast Cancer Awareness a council meeting in October I am not sure when that meeting will take place.

Thank you, Martha
Martha Guerrero
MAYOR
City of West Sacramento
1110 West Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Telephone: 916-233-7395
1162
2 From: Leslie Hunter <[email protected]> on behalf of Leslie Hunter <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2024 11:05 AM
To: Guerrero, Martha <[email protected]> Subject: City Council Breast Cancer Awareness Proclamation request from Thriving Pink CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Martha,
It was a pleasure meeting you at the West Sacramento Chamber of Commerce ribbon cutting event for Thriving Pink, and I know our board chair Joni was pleased to present to your Rotary as well. Thank you for your very personal interest in our nonprofit and the work we do in Yolo County for those with a breast cancer diagnosis.

Thriving Pink is requesting the West Sacramento City Council to recognize October as National Breast Cancer Awareness Month, and to recognize Thriving Pink for its support of local breast cancer survivors and their families. We support all those who have been impacted by breast cancer and some West Sacramento residents have received financial assistance from us and participate in our no cost programs. As we shared with you, with more of a presence in West Sacramento, we hope the word spreads about our free suppport services.

If you are agreeable, could a brief recognition be held at your 10/16 or another meeting? Thriving Pink could provide the proclamation wording as well.

Thank you for your consideration.

I look forward to hearing back from you.

Thank you,
Leslie
Leslie Hunter
Executive Director
Thriving Pink
530.219.2250
[email protected]
1163
1 From: Guerrero, Martha <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2024 2:34 PM
To: Berlin, Amanda <[email protected]>; Hosley, Paul <[email protected]>; Robinson, Jon <[email protected]>
Cc: Laurel, Aaron <[email protected]>; Don Schatzel <[email protected]> Subject: Future Agenda Item: City Council Girls Softball Proclamation Hello Amanda,
Don Schatzel and Paul have been preparing a city council proclamation for our wonderful Girls Softball 쐦쐜쐝쐞쐟쐠쐡쐢쐣쐧쐤쐨쐥 teams to be presented at a future council meeting.

I respectfully submit this request for council approval so that we may have a proudly offer our presentation to the Girls Softball team and their families.

Best, Martha
Martha Guerrero
MAYOR
City of West Sacramento
1110 West Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Telephone: 916-233-7395
1164
1 From: Orozco, Quirina <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2024 5:11:56 AM
To: Laurel, Aaron <[email protected]>
Cc: Sulpizio Hull, Verna <[email protected]> Subject: Filipino Heritage month
Good morning, Aaron.

Per a conversation we had a few months ago, I would like to pursue a proclamation on the regular annual rotation for Filipino American heritage month. I will ask for this to be a future agenda item at our next meeting. Thank you.

Quirina
1165
1166 2

West Sacramento City CouncilSeptember 18, 2024

West Sacramento City Council
September 18, 2024