Agenda packet, regular meeting — West Sacramento City Council, January 15, 2025 (part 4 of 5)

CONTRACTOR
(Rank) Contractor B&M Builders, Inc.

Swierstok Enterprise
Inc., dba Pro
Builders
TPA Construction,
Inc
Base Bid $851,161 $884,946 $1,020,922.16
As summarized above and based on the review and evaluation of all bids received along with required documentation, staff has determined to disqualify all bids, since the bids received were higher than the construction estimate. City staff will be re-evaluating this project and next steps.

Environmental Considerations
The B Street Tower Parklet Project falls under a Class 1 and Class 2 Categorical exemption according to CEQA.

Class 1 consists of repair, maintenance or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use (Existing Facilities, Section 15301, CEQA Guidelines). Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. This project includes repairing and adjusting tower bracing, removing current art panels and signs, cleaning the existing structure, adding a small concrete slab underneath the tower and painting lower portion of the tower, which is consistent within the activities under the Class 1 and Class 2 exemption and is therefore determined to be categorically exempt under California Environmental Quality Act. A notice of exemption will be filed, if approved by Council, at the time of contract award once the project is bid again.

Commission Recommendation
The B Street Tower Parklet Project was presented as part of the North Riverwalk Trail Extension Project to multiple commissions, including the Planning, Economic Development and Housing and Parks, Recreation and Intergenerational Services (PRIS) Commissions in 2013 and 2014. It was proposed as both a circulation and park facility improvement within the Washington Realized Sustainable Community Strategy. District residents provided comments to the PRIS Commission, requesting that the Trail Extension and Parklet Projects be prioritized for completion. Each of the Commissions recommended Council approval of the improvements as part of the Washington Realized effort, which was subsequently followed through with presentations and actions.

Strategic Plan Integration
Not applicable.

Alternatives
The City Council may decide to:
1) Approve the recommended action as described above; or 2) Delay the recommended action and direct staff to return with alternative recommendations.

Alternative 2 is not recommended, given that staff already intends to re-evaluate the project.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared in coordination with, and reviewed by, the Economic Development and Housing Department, Finance Department, and Community Development Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
There are no budget actions required. The B Street Tower Parklet Project (CIP 15056) was approved by Council on January 17, 2024, as part of the City’s CIP budget and sufficient funds are available to complete all recommended actions.

ATTACHMENT
Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map
654
655

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 15, 2025 ITEM #8
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-2 AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS 10-12 TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR TORRES PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. FOR THE FIRE STATION 43 TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP 51031) INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [ X ] Staff
[ ] Other
Jamie Teske, Senior Project Manager
Capital Projects Department
ATTACHMENT [ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to adopt Resolution 25-2 amending the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and approval of change orders 10-12 to the Torres Project Management, Inc. construction contract for the Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement project (CIP 51031).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Adopt Resolution 25-2 amending the Capital Improvement Program budget; 2) Approve change orders 10-12 to the construction contract with Torres Project Management, Inc. in the amount of $28,295.13 for the Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement project; 3) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute change orders 10-12; 4) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute contract amendments or change orders for up to an additional $10,000 in contingency; and
5) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the construction contract, with approval from the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND
Fire Station 43, constructed in 1970, is one of the earliest fire stations in West Sacramento. The current facility is limited to a single restroom serving both fire personnel and public guests. Additionally, the dormitories fail to meet the necessary standards for providing adequate sleeping quarters for fire personnel. These areas have not undergone any renovations or upgrades and are in urgent need of being brough up to code. The aging infrastructure is evident through visible wear and tear, moisture damage, ventilation inadequacies, and recurrent plumbing issues.

On April 10, 2024, the City Council entered into a construction contract with Torres Project Management, Inc., for the Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement project. The project has reached substantial completion and is on track for final completion in January 2025.

ANALYSIS
The project is in the construction phase, and during this time, additional items were identified that needed to be addressed to complete the project. Specifically, it was determined that the accessible restroom required revisions to meet compliance standards, which added to the scope of work and required additional staff time. Additionally, a few miscellaneous items were identified as necessary to ensure the project is completed successfully and meets all intended objectives.

Environmental Considerations
The Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement project is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to the Categorical Exemption under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1. Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.

Commission Recommendation
Not Applicable.
656
Construction Contract For Torres Project Management Construction, Inc. for the Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement Project January 15, 2025

Page 2 ends

Strategic Plan Integration
This project is consistent with the City of West Sacramento’s Strategic Plan Mission to provide Quality Municipal Services, Quality City Infrastructure and Facilities and to Inspire Community Improvements that add value to the lives of our residents.

Alternatives
The Council’s primary alternatives are summarized below:
1) Approve the recommended actions as stated above.
2) Delay or revise the recommended actions.
3) Not approved the recommended actions.

Alternatives 2 and 3 are not recommended because this project is substantially complete, and these changes are necessary to ensure its full completion. Any changes or modifications would delay the project and would likely increase the cost of the project.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department and has been coordinated with and reviewed by the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
The Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement project (51031) is included in the City’s current Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Staff is requesting a funding allocation of $85,000 from the General Facilities Fund, as the existing project budget does not have sufficient funding to cover change orders 10-12 with Torres Project Management, Inc., as well as additional staff time and project closeout items.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution 25-2

2. Change orders 10-12 with Torres Project Management, Inc. 657
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 25-2

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

APPROVING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET AMENDMENT TO FULLY FUND THE FIRE STATION 43 TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP 51031) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
WHEREAS, CIP- 51031 – Fire Station 43 TI Project was established in FY 2021/22, and appropriations of $920,812 from the General Facilities Fund have subsequently been approved to fund the project; and
WHEREAS, on February 23, 2024, the Capital Projects Department conducted a competitive bid to select a contractor for the Fire Station 43 TI Project and staff determined that TPM Construction, Inc. is the lowest-cost, responsive, qualified bidder, with a total bid of $480,700; and
WHEREAS, additional funding of $85,000 is needed to fund change orders 10-12 to the construction contract with TPM Construction, Inc., including additional contingency of $10,000, additional staff time/ICAP and additional project close out items; and WHEREAS, staff is proposing to appropriate $85,000 from the General Facilities Fund (208); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all information related to this matter, as presented at the public meetings of the City Council identified herein, including any supporting reports by City staff, and any other information provided during public meetings; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento as follows:

1. The City Council hereby approves amendments to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the 2023/24 fiscal year as listed below:

SOURCES
$85,000 400-9900-4990/400-51031-4990 Transfer into project $85,000 208-0000-3110 General Facilities Fund Balance
$85,000 TOTAL SOURCES
USES
$85,000 208-9910-5950 Tsfr from General Facilities Fund $85,000 400-9900-5530/51031-5800 Fire Station 43 TI Project $85,000 TOTAL USES
*Note: Interfund transfers not included in total to avoid duplication of total costs.

2. The City Council hereby finds that the facts set forth in the recitals to this Resolution are true and correct and establish the factual basis for the City Council’s adoption of this Resolution.

3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the West Sacramento City Council this 15th day of January 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:
658
Resolution 25-2

Page 2 of 2 ends

NOES:

ABSENT:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
659
CPC24-082 Request Date: 10/15/2024
P0170165 Change Order # 10
Council Date 1/15/2025
Vendor:

Project:

Submitted by: Contractor Reviewed by: Division Manager/Department Head Jonathan Torres, Owner Jai Chahal, Const. Facilities & Development Manager Date [email protected]
Reviewed by: Project Manager Approved by:

Jamie Teske, Senior Project Manager Aaron Laurel, City Manager Date City Budget Approval:

Susana Jackson, Finance Manager Date
Approved as to form: Attest:

Jeff Mitchell, City Attorney Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Date Contracts initially approved by Council also require City Attorney and City Clerk Signatures Contract #
Purchase Order #
$582,756.68
The contract sum will be increased by this Change Order:

New contract sum including all Change Orders:

CHANGE ORDER
Cost Center #
400-9900-5530/400-51031-5866
Net change by previous Change Orders:

CONTRACTOR agrees that the amount of increase or decrease in the contract sum specified in this change order shall constitute full compensation for the work required by this change order, including but not limited to all compensation for the additional and/or revised work specified herein, and shall fully compensate CONTRACTOR for any and all direct and indirect costs that may be incurred by CONTRACTOR in connection with such additional and/or revised work, including any changes, disruptions or delays in work schedules or in the performance of other work by CONTRACTOR.

The time for performance of the Contract will increase 0 working days by reason of the work described by this Change Order. Except as herein above expressly provided, CONTRACTOR further agrees that the performance of the work specified in this Change Order or the rescheduling of other project work made necessary by this Change Order, shall not constitute a delay which will extend the time limit for completion of the work as said term is used in the Contract between CITY and CONTRACTOR for the project.

Torres Project Management, Inc. (V021631)
Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement Project
Description:
$99,437.72
$580,137.72
Upon mutual acceptance of this document the City of West Sacramento, hereinafter referred to as "City"' and your firm, hereinafter referred to a "Contractor", in accordance with the terms and conditions of the original contract documents, you are hereby directed to make the following change or changes for the consideration set forth below:

Change Order 10- Floor Vents
The original contract sum was: $480,700.00
The contract sum prior to this Change Order was:
$2,618.96
660
TPM CONSTRUCTION INC License # 1079394
Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement Project
PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER # 10 - (N) Floor Vents
REVISED 10/15/2024

MATERIAL
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
Tax
Freight
Mark-Up 15%
Total Material
Engineering, shop drawings, Rental equip
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal

0.00 0.00

0.00 Total Equip $0.00
LABOR
Description Units Prod Rate MH Cost/MH Subtotal

0.00 0.00

0.00 Total
Labor Burden
& markup 15%

0.00 Total Labor
Subcontractors
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
$2,400.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 Mark-Up 5% $120.00
Total Sub's $2,520.00
TOTAL $2,520.00
Bond (3%)
Liability (.9%)
Extended Duration
Bond & Ins. Costs
Total Cost $2,618.96
TIME EXTENSION REQUESTED = 0 Working days
NOTES:
$75.60
$23.36
$98.96
Valley Mechanical (N) Floor Vents 1 $2,400.00
$63.59
661
Submittal CTPP 1.0 9-14-15
Linear Bar Diffusers
Aluminum • Fixed Bars • Pencil Proof
Models: CT-PP-0 • 7/16" Spacing • 7/32" Bars • 0o Deflection CT-PP-3 • 7/16" Spacing • 7/32" Bars • 30o Deflection
Model CT-PP-0 • 0o Deflection
Core with Heavy Duty Mounting Frame for Floor Applications Type 5 heavy duty mounting frame is shown. For other
available types, please see next page.

Core Only
Model CT-PP-0 core is shown. For other available
models, please see below.

Core with Border
Type 13 border is shown. For other available types,
please see next page.

Core with Frame & Border
Type 1A frame & border combination is shown. For other
available types, please see next page.

Core is always
furnished with Type H
add’l reinforcing.

Available Cores
†
Note: † Not recommended for floor applications with heavy loads or high traffic.

If placing furniture on cores, furniture legs should be a minimum of core spacing plus two bars wide to avoid placing a horizontal load on core.
†
Model CT-PP-3 • 30o Deflection
7/16" 7/32"
Support Bar
Duct Size minus 3/4"
1 5/32" 1 5/32"
7/32" 7/16"
Duct Size minus 3/4"
Support Bar
Check if provided. 
Will Provide In Black Colorway
662
O = 2B plus D minus 3/4"
1 1/4"
3/16"
D = Duct Size
B
D minus 3/4"
O = D
D = Duct Size
3/4"
3/4"
1 9/16"
1/4"
1 9/16"
1/2" D minus 3/4"
O = D plus 7/16"
D = Duct Size
7/16"
3/16"
1 9/16"
3/8"
1" D = Duct Size
1" D minus 3/4" O = D plus 2" D minus 3/4"
1 1/4" D = Duct Size
1 5/8"
3/8"
O = D plus 2 1/2"
1 1/4" O = D plus 1 1/4"
D = Duct Size
3/4" 3/16"
5/8"
1 1/8"
D minus 3/4"
D = Duct Size
O = D minus 1/4"
1 1/4"
3/16"
1/4" D minus 3/4" O = 2B plus D minus 3/4"
D = Duct Size
1 1/4"
3/16" B D minus 3/4"
Frame & Border Type 1A • 1" Border
Frame & Border Types • Dimensions
CTPP 2.0 9-14-15
Frame & Border Type 1B • 1 ¼" Border Frame & Border Type 2 • ¾" Border Frame & Border Type 4
• ¼" Border
• Spring Latch
Border Type 7 • ¼" Border
Frame & Border Type 3
• ½" Border
• Spring Latch
Border Types • Dimensions
Border Type 11 • ½" Border
Border Type 12 • ¾" Border
Border Type 13 • 1" Border
Border Type 14 • 1 ¼" Border
Heavy Duty Mounting Frames for Floor Applications
(See submittal D-CT-HD for loading limitations.)
Frame Type 5 • 1" Flange
Removable core is furnished with frame.

See front page for core selections. When
spring clip is furnished, add an additional
¼" to duct width.

Removable core is furnished with frame.

See front page for core selections. When
spring clip is furnished, add an additional
1/4" to duct width.

Core Only (No Frame, No Border)
Frame Type 6 • No Flange
Type CO
Check if provided. 
Check if provided. 
Check if provided. 
Border Type 22 Tape & Spackle
A = 5/8" D = Duct Size
Note:
1/16" cut back
accomodates
weld beads on
corners. Note:
1/16" cut back
accomodates
weld beads on
corners.
663
Duct
6" Max. 6" Max.

S
D
17/32"
5/8"
Type B • Spring clip
For sill installations. Used with Frame &
Border Types 7, 11, 12, 13, 14.

Must use AG-35B instead of AG-35 with Type
B fastening. Sill opening size must be slightly
larger to accommodate spring clips.

Used with border
width 1/2” or wider.

Alignment pins used
with 1/4” borders.

Dimensions are for length or width.

CTPP 3.0 9-14-15
Standard Core Width Information
Dimensions are for length or width.

Duct Size ¼” Spacing ½" or 7/16" Spacing
D Core Opening
C
Number
of Bars
2 2 ½
3 3 ½
4 5
6 1 ¼
1 ¾
2 ¼
2 ¾
3 ¼
4 ¼
5 ¼
Core Opening
C
Number
of Bars
3 5
7 9
11 15
19 1 ¼
1 ¾
2 ¼
2 ¾
3 ¼
4 ¼
5 ¼
2 3
4 5
6 8
10 Core Only
S=9” Maximum Support Bar Spacing. D=72” Maximum for One Piece.

Core Only is an option available for field framing. Standard widths are Alignment Strips as shown. Core will ship 3/4” smaller than the duct width.

Overall Length and Widths for Various Frame & Border Types Available Fastenings
Type A • Screw Holes
For ceiling, side wall or sill.

Used with Frame & Border
Types 1B, 5, 11, 12, 13, 14.

Type C • Concealed Fastening
For ceiling, side wall or sill.

Used with Frame & Border Types 1A, 1B, 2,
7, 11, 12, 13, 14, & Border Type 22
Additional Reinforcing (optional)
Type H • Optional Heavy Duty Core
• Standard with Heavy Duty Mounting Frame Types 5 and 6 Optional Heavy Duty Core has support bars on
6” maximum centers. (Standard core has 9”
maximum centers.) See Submittal CT-HD for
maximum loading.

All dimensions are in inches.

Check if provided. 
Check if provided. 
C
D
O
F
Core
Border Types
(Type 11 shown)
F O C
Type Border Length Overall Length Core Opening Length
5 6
7 11
12 13
14 D
D
D minus 5/8
D minus 5/8
D minus 5/8
D minus 5/8
D minus 5/8
D plus 1 5/8
D
D minus ¼
D plus ¼
D plus ¾
D plus 1 ¼
D plus 1 ¾
D minus 3/8
D minus 3/8
D minus ¾
D minus ¾
D minus ¾
D minus ¾
D minus ¾
C
DO
F
Frame & Border Types
Core
(Type 1A & 1B shown)
F O C
Type Border Length Overall Length Core Opening Length
1A
1B
2 3
4 D
D
D
D
D
D plus 2
D plus 2 ½
D plus 1 ¼
D plus 7/16
D
D minus ¾
D minus ¾
D minus ¾
D minus ¾
D minus ¾
22 D minus 5/8 D plus 2 ½ D minus ¾
664
D'
D = O D = O
Outside
O
D
D'
Inside D = O
D O
D'
D = O
2 7/16" 6"
L2 L3 R3
X
L1
Dimension X
R1 R2 Specify
X
Note:
is 6 Feet
Length
Maximum
BLKS
3"
Optional Mitered Corners
Model BLKS Steel Blank-Off Model AD Access Door (Not available on Types 3, 4 5, 6 and 22) For all widths of Model CT diffusers.

Furnished in 6 foot lengths for field
cutting and installation. Steel, painted
flat black.

Model AG-30 Single Blade Damper
For Model CT diffuser widths 11/2 through 4”.

Friction hinge on 11/2” and 2” widths.

Screwdriver operator on 21/2” through 4“.

Cannot be attached to Frame & Border Types 3,
4, 5, or 6. For those types use Model AG-35B
damper on diffusers 3” and wider.

Model 07 Directional Blades
For all widths of Model CT diffusers 3” or
greater. Cannot be attached to Frame &
Border Types 3 and 4. Can be used with
Type 5 and 6 if Type B Spring Clip
Fastening is omitted.

Model AG-35 Opposed Damper
For Model CT diffusers 3” and wider. Cannot
be attached to Frame & Border Types 3 and 4.

Use Model AG-35 B damper for those types.

Note: Minimum duct width is 3”.

General Description
· TITUS linear bar diffusers are
designed for both supply and
return applications.
· Standard lengths are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
and 6 feet, furnished as complete,
welded assemblies. · Lengths greater than 6 feet are furnished in multiple sections, the number and size
determined by the factory.
· Sections can be joined end-to-end for
continuous appearance, using standard
alignment strips or alignment pins. · All deflection bars are fixed and are parallel to the long
dimension.
· Fixed Bars are extruded
aluminum.
· Border Types 5 and 6 are the
only frame styles available for
floor applications.

CTPP 4.0 9-14-15
Additional Reinforcing (optional)
Duct
Width D’
Duct
Length D
Frame & Border Type
1A 1B 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 12 13 14 CO
2 - 4
4 ½ - 6
12 18
12 15/16 18 15/1613 3/16 19 3
/16 12 5
/8 18 5
/8
12 3/16 18 3
/16 1218
12 13/16 18 13/16 12
18 11 7/8 17 7
/8 12 1
/8 18 1
/8 12 3
/8 18 3
/8 12 5
/8 18 5
/8 12 7
/8 18 7
/8 1218
Type O • 0o Deflection
Type A • Deflection Inside
Type B • Deflection Outside
Floor, Ceiling or Sill
Type C • Side Wall, Inside
Type D • Side Wall, Outside
Standard Finish: #26 White
Check if provided. 
This submittal is meant to demonstrate general dimensions of this product. The drawings are not meant to detail every aspect of the product. Drawings are not to scale. Titus reserves the right to make changes without written notice. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage retrieval system without permission in writing from Air Distribution Technologies.

MC-PP-0 • 7/16" Spacing • 7/32" Bars • 0o Deflection
MC-PP-3 • 7/16" Spacing • 7/32" Bars • 30o Deflection
665
CPC24-082 Request Date: 10/30/2024
P0170165 Change Order # 11
Council Date 1/15/2025
Vendor:

Project:

Jamie Teske, Senior Project Manager Aaron Laurel, City Manager Date City Budget Approval:

Susana Jackson, Finance Manager Date
Approved as to form: Attest:

Jeff Mitchell, City Attorney Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Date Contracts initially approved by Council also require City Attorney and City Clerk Signatures Contract #
Purchase Order #
$607,313.60
The contract sum will be increased by this Change Order:

New contract sum including all Change Orders:

CHANGE ORDER
Cost Center #
400-9900-5530/400-51031-5866
Net change by previous Change Orders:

The time for performance of the Contract will increase 10 working days by reason of the work described by this Change Order. Except as herein above expressly provided, CONTRACTOR further agrees that the performance of the work specified in this Change Order or the rescheduling of other project work made necessary by this Change Order, shall not constitute a delay which will extend the time limit for completion of the work as said term is used in the Contract between CITY and CONTRACTOR for the project.

Torres Project Management, Inc. (V021631)
Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement Project
Description:
$102,056.68
$582,756.68
Upon mutual acceptance of this document the City of West Sacramento, hereinafter referred to as "City"' and your firm, hereinafter referred to a "Contractor", in accordance with the terms and conditions of the original contract documents, you are hereby directed to make the following change or changes for the consideration set forth below:

Change Order 11- Accessible Restroom
The original contract sum was: $480,700.00
The contract sum prior to this Change Order was:
$24,556.92
666
TPM CONSTRUCTION INC License # 1079394
Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement Project
PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER # 11 - Accessible Restroom
REVISED 10/30/2024

MATERIAL
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
Tax
Freight
Mark-Up 15%
Total Material
Engineering, shop drawings, Rental equip
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
$6,847.20

0.00 0.00
Total $6,847.20
LABOR
Description Units Prod Rate MH Cost/MH Subtotal
$644.80
$861.60
$1,710.72
Labor Burden
& markup 15%

0.00 Total Labor
Subcontractors
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
$2,302.44
$1,339.00
$1,895.58

0.00 Mark-Up 5% $488.37
Total Sub's $10,255.89
TOTAL $23,629.01
Bond (3%)
Liability (.9%)
Extended Duration
Bond & Ins. Costs
Total Cost $24,556.92
TIME EXTENSION REQUESTED = 10 Working days
NOTES:
$708.87
$219.04
$927.91
KC&S Specialties (N) Door Frame & Door 1 $2,302.44
Laborer 1166
Laborer Pour back concrete/ patch stucco 88
Remove wall & breakout concrete
Carpenter Re-frame accessible shower & door 88
Drywaller Re-Hang, Tape & Texture 16
Perrys Plumbing & Piping Restroom Modifications $4,230.50 $4,230.50 BNT Tile Re-Apply Waterproofing & Tile 1 $1,339.00
1 $80.60
$80.60
$1,289.60
$107.70
$106.92
$676.00
$5,182.72
American Sheet Metal Shower Bench Seat &
Accessories
1 $ 1,895.58
Several items needed to re-frame shower walls,
frame new shower wall at accessible distance.

Place structural support for the inwall toilet carrier.

Pour new concrete and patch stucco and pumbling
and gas line modifications.
1 $1,168.00 $1,168.00
$0
$0
$175.20
$1,343.20
Superintendent Extended Supervision 80 MH $85.59
667
DATE: 9/24/2024
C.O.P 01
The Description of Vendor Partner Change Order Request is as follows:

Labor Breakdown: manpower x man hours x hourly rate
Sub Total:

Sub Total:

Material Breakdown:

Sub Total:
$ 227.16
Tax 7.875%
Sub Total:

PROJECT NAME: Fire Station #43 Tenant
ADDRESS:

CONTRACTOR: TPM Construction Inc.
1561 Harbor Blvd.West Sacramento, CA 95691
REASON FOR REQUEST (ie: RFI, Owner, City, Other): RFI-19 Furnish & Install:

Hours 3
Rate PW Area 3 $122.82
$ 368.46
Overhead & Profit (15%): $ 55.27
Overhead & Profit (15%):
$ 137.15
$ 1,878.71
Total C.O.P $ 2,302.44
Materials $ 1,514.40
$ 1,514.40
DATE DATE 9/24/2024

CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR

CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL
COP for RFI-19: 2’10 6’8 WD door, new HM frame head, swing-clear hinges to convert door & frame #3 to be a 2’10 opening.

NAME NAME Katherine Harris
$ 423.73
432 Bitritto Way Suite #3
Modesto, CA 95356
Office 209-236-1604
Fax 209-567-2925
www.kcsconstructionspecialties.com
E-mail: [email protected]
668
CA LIC #: 989585
DIR #:1001164653
Change Order
Job name: Fire Station #43 Prepared by: Nick Perry
Contractor name: TPM Construction Phone number: 916-947-5686 Job address: 1561 Harbor Blvd Email: [email protected] Amount: $4,230.50 Mailing address: 925 U Street Rio Linda Invoice date: 10/20/2024 CA 95673
CHANGE ORDER #4 (ADA RR)
INCLUDES:
● Labor: 22 hours X $125/hr = $2,750.00
● Material: $402.73
● Finish: $645.03
● Re-Stock: $95.77
● Consumables: $35.00
● P&OH: 15%= $589.28
Total= $4,517.81
Credit Back= $287.31
669
B.N.T. Tile, Inc.
502 Main Street
Wheatland Ca 95692
License # 1022374
Date: 10/14/2023
3 time Commercial Tile installation of the year
award winning Bob Files has been installing
Ceramic Tile since 1978
530-788-2691
TPM
Fire Station 43
1561 Harbor Blvd
West Sacramento Ca
Change order
Specification Section: Ceramic Tile
Re-apply waterprofing at accessible restroom. Provide and Install 2x2 Venom accent tile in showers.

Material cost increase.

Material cost: $276.60
Freight: $75.00
Sales Tax 8.25%: $29.01
Labor 8 hours PW: 784.00
15% P/O: 174.69
Total: 1,339.30
Base Bid $ 1,339.00 (tax included)
QUOTATION ACCEPTANCE:

This quotation is good for 30 days. All sales are final. Any additional work beyond the outlined scope listed above or any unforeseen circumstances will be at the customers cost. The conditions stated above shall be deemed to be incorporated into the contract. The undersigned hereby accepts this proposal.

Submitted By: Nicole Gallier, [email protected]
670
Date:

To:

Attn:

Email: Accepted By:

Project: Signature:

From: Date Signed:

Phone:

Model Number QTY Labor Each Material Each Extended
6737X24 3 $27.09 $82.04 $246.12
220816 3 $27.09 $495.64 $1,486.92
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Labor Total $162.54 Material Total $1,733.04
Final Change Amount $1,895.58
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Description Extended
ADD SOAP DISPENSER $81.27
ADD BENCH, PAPER TOWEL & WASTE $81.27
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
American Sheet Metal Partition Co., Inc.
5027 Roberts Ave. - McClellan, CA 95652 -- Phone - 916-564-6691 / Fax - 916-564-2040 10/13/2024 Change Order Request 1 -
Torres Project Management Inc.

Johnathan Torres
[email protected]
Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement Project

MILES FORWARD
916-564-6691
671
Project: 51031 - Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement
Project
1561 Harbor Blvd
West Sacramento, California 95691
Daily Log: Friday 10/4/2024
Daily Log Completed & Distributed
The Daily Log was completed and distributed by Marcos Lopez on Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 03:44 PM PDT.

WEATHER REPORT
Temperature Precipitation Since Humidity Windspeed
Low High Avg Midnight 2 Days Ago 3 Days Ago Low Avg High Dew Avg Max Gust 62°F 97°F 79°F 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 13% 27% 50% 41°F 4.7 mph 7 mph 9 mph

DAILY SNAPSHOT
06:00 AM 09:00 AM 12:00 PM 03:00 PM 06:00 PM 09:00 PM
Clear
67°F
Clear
75°F
Clear
89°F
Clear
95°F
Clear
94°F
Clear
76°F

OBSERVED WEATHER CONDITIONS
No. Time Observed Weather Delay Sky Temp Average Precipitation Wind Ground/Sea Calamity 1 01:45:00 PM No
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT LOG 3.0 Workers | 19.0 Total Hours No. Company Trade
Foreman Journeyman Apprentice Other
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
1 Perrys Plumbing & Piping Plumbing 0 0.0 2 11.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Comments: Nick Perry
Martin Meadows
Re-routed gas and drain pipes in ada restroom
Installed hose bib
Created By: Marcos Lopez
2 TPM Construction Inc. Concrete 0 0.0 1 8.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Comments: Jose Mireles
Prepared for concrete
Filled concrete patches
Installed ceiling grills
Created By: Marcos Lopez
TOTAL 0 0 3 19 0 0 0 0

Page 1 of 3 ends

672
Daily Construction Report Log's Attachments:

1. Perrys Plumbing & Piping
1728079830745.964111_tempImage.jpeg
1728079830604.405029_tempImage.jpeg
1728079830674.501953_tempImage.jpeg
1728079830464.947021_tempImage.jpeg

2. TPM Construction Inc.
1728080073840.169922_tempImage.jpeg
1728080017295.621826_tempImage.jpeg
1728080017204.558838_tempImage.jpeg
1728080017363.284180_tempImage.jpeg

Page 2 of 3 ends

673
1728080017440.462158_tempImage.jpeg
1728080073906.357910_tempImage.jpeg
1728080017579.915039_tempImage.jpeg
1728080017649.575928_tempImage.jpeg
1728080073759.385010_tempImage.jpeg
1728080017509.996826_tempImage.jpeg
By Date Copies To

Page 3 of 3 ends

674
Project: 51031 - Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement
Project
1561 Harbor Blvd
West Sacramento, California 95691
Daily Log: Tuesday 10/8/2024
Daily Log Completed & Distributed
The Daily Log was completed and distributed by Marcos Lopez on Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 03:30 PM PDT.

WEATHER REPORT
Temperature Precipitation Since Humidity Windspeed
Low High Avg Midnight 2 Days Ago 3 Days Ago Low Avg High Dew Avg Max Gust 61°F 98°F 78°F 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 14% 37% 64% 47°F 3.8 mph 8 mph 12 mph

DAILY SNAPSHOT
06:00 AM 09:00 AM 12:00 PM 03:00 PM 06:00 PM 09:00 PM
Clear
62°F
Clear
72°F
Clear
88°F
Clear
99°F
Clear
94°F
Clear
75°F

OBSERVED WEATHER CONDITIONS
No. Time Observed Weather Delay Sky Temp Average Precipitation Wind Ground/Sea Calamity 1 12:00:00 PM No
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT LOG 3.0 Workers | 24.0 Total Hours No. Company Trade
Foreman Journeyman Apprentice Other
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
1 TPM Construction Inc. Rough Carpentry 0 0.0 1 8.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Comments: Jose Mireles
Framed in accessible restroom door, shower wall and wall hung toilet and applied backing Painted base in gym area
Created By: Marcos Lopez
2 JTE Electrical Inc Electrical 0 0.0 1 8.0 1 8.0 0 0.0 Comments: Antonio Villanueva
Leonardo Garcia - apprentice
Installed light switches, restroom gfci and did rough electrical in accessible restroom Created By: Marcos Lopez
TOTAL 0 0 2 16 1 8 0 0

Page 1 of 3 ends

675
Daily Construction Report Log's Attachments:

1. TPM Construction Inc.
1728426351586.807861_tempImage.jpeg
1728426351651.518799_tempImage.jpeg
1728426351448.861084_tempImage.jpeg
1728426351788.913086_tempImage.jpeg
1728426351857.428955_tempImage.jpeg
1728426351724.444824_tempImage.jpeg
1728426351321.909912_tempImage.jpeg
1728426351518.471924_tempImage.jpeg

Page 2 of 3 ends

676

2. JTE Electrical Inc
1728426471182.750000_tempImage.jpeg
1728426471484.538086_tempImage.jpeg
1728426471347.089111_tempImage.jpeg
1728426471278.254883_tempImage.jpeg
1728426471549.245850_tempImage.jpeg
1728426471421.035889_tempImage.jpeg
By Date Copies To

Page 3 of 3 ends

677
Project: 51031 - Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement
Project
1561 Harbor Blvd
West Sacramento, California 95691
Daily Log: Friday 10/11/2024
Daily Log Completed & Distributed
The Daily Log was completed and distributed by Marcos Lopez on Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:36 PM PDT.

WEATHER REPORT
Temperature Precipitation Since Humidity Windspeed
Low High Avg Midnight 2 Days Ago 3 Days Ago Low Avg High Dew Avg Max Gust 53°F 81°F 66°F 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 15% 51% 79% 45°F 6.2 mph 10 mph 19 mph

DAILY SNAPSHOT
06:00 AM 09:00 AM 12:00 PM 03:00 PM 06:00 PM 09:00 PM
Clear
56°F
Clear
58°F
Clear
72°F
Clear
80°F
Clear
78°F
Clear
64°F

OBSERVED WEATHER CONDITIONS
No. Time Observed Weather Delay Sky Temp Average Precipitation Wind Ground/Sea Calamity 1 09:30:00 AM No
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT LOG 4.0 Workers | 22.0 Total Hours No. Company Trade
Foreman Journeyman Apprentice Other
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
1 DL Masonry Masonry 0 0.0 2 6.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Comments: Eduardo Ordóñez
Baldomero Rico
Repaired front block wall
Created By: Marcos Lopez
2 TPM Construction Inc. Wall Finishes 0 0.0 2 16.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Comments: Martiniano Mireles
Jose Mireles
Taped and floated accessible restroom
Touched up damaged walls and sanded them to smooth finish Created By: Marcos Lopez
TOTAL 0 0 4 22 0 0 0 0

Page 1 of 3 ends

678
Daily Construction Report Log's Attachments:

1. DL Masonry
1728675773493.333984_tempImage.jpeg 1728675773374.650879_tempImage.jpeg

2. TPM Construction Inc.
1728686098388.646973_tempImage.jpeg
1728686097830.614014_tempImage.jpeg
1728686098260.900879_tempImage.jpeg
1728686098634.000977_tempImage.jpeg
1728686097993.283936_tempImage.jpeg
1728686098062.850098_tempImage.jpeg

Page 2 of 3 ends

679
1728686098447.440186_tempImage.jpeg
1728686097934.952881_tempImage.jpeg
1728686098510.318115_tempImage.jpeg
1728686098693.324951_tempImage.jpeg
1728686098573.943115_tempImage.jpeg
1728686098196.692871_tempImage.jpeg
1728686098320.280029_tempImage.jpeg
1728686098133.164795_tempImage.jpeg
By Date Copies To

Page 3 of 3 ends

680
Project: 51031 - Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement
Project
1561 Harbor Blvd
West Sacramento, California 95691
Daily Log: Tuesday 10/15/2024
Daily Log Completed & Distributed
The Daily Log was completed and distributed by Marcos Lopez on Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 03:54 PM PDT.

WEATHER REPORT
Temperature Precipitation Since Humidity Windspeed
Low High Avg Midnight 2 Days Ago 3 Days Ago Low Avg High Dew Avg Max Gust 57°F 83°F 69°F 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 38% 64% 88% 55°F 4.1 mph 8 mph 11 mph

DAILY SNAPSHOT
06:00 AM 09:00 AM 12:00 PM 03:00 PM 06:00 PM 09:00 PM
Clear
59°F
Clear
63°F
Clear
75°F
Clear
83°F
Clear
82°F
Clear
68°F

OBSERVED WEATHER CONDITIONS
No. Time Observed Weather Delay Sky Temp Average Precipitation Wind Ground/Sea Calamity 1 07:45:00 AM No
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT LOG 4.0 Workers | 20.0 Total Hours No. Company Trade
Foreman Journeyman Apprentice Other
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
1 TPM Construction Inc. Wall Finishes 0 0.0 2 4.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Comments: Martiniano Mireles
Jose Mireles
Sanded walls in ADA restroom
Grinned down high spots in concrete
Created By: Marcos Lopez
2 JTE Electrical Inc Electrical 0 0.0 2 16.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Comments: German Velasquez
Antonio Villanueva
Installed electrical panel interior
Created By: Marcos Lopez
TOTAL 0 0 4 20 0 0 0 0

Page 1 of 2 ends

681
Daily Construction Report Log's Attachments:

1. TPM Construction Inc.
1729032867745.934082_tempImage.jpeg 1729032867833.847900_tempImage.jpeg

2. JTE Electrical Inc
1729032777084.429932_tempImage.jpeg
By Date Copies To

Page 2 of 2 ends

682
CPC24-082 Request Date: 11/21/2024
P0170165 Change Order # 12
Council Date 1/15/2025
Vendor:

Project:

Jamie Teske, Senior Project Manager Aaron Laurel, City Manager Date City Budget Approval:

Susana Jackson, Finance Manager Date
Approved as to form: Attest:

Jeff Mitchell, City Attorney Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Date Contracts initially approved by Council also require City Attorney and City Clerk Signatures Contract #
Purchase Order #
$608,432.85
The contract sum will be increased by this Change Order:

New contract sum including all Change Orders:

CHANGE ORDER
Cost Center #
400-9900-5530/400-51031-5866
Net change by previous Change Orders:

The time for performance of the Contract will increase 1 working days by reason of the work described by this Change Order. Except as herein above expressly provided, CONTRACTOR further agrees that the performance of the work specified in this Change Order or the rescheduling of other project work made necessary by this Change Order, shall not constitute a delay which will extend the time limit for completion of the work as said term is used in the Contract between CITY and CONTRACTOR for the project.

Torres Project Management, Inc. (V021631)
Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement Project
Description:
$126,613.60
$607,313.60
Upon mutual acceptance of this document the City of West Sacramento, hereinafter referred to as "City"' and your firm, hereinafter referred to a "Contractor", in accordance with the terms and conditions of the original contract documents, you are hereby directed to make the following change or changes for the consideration set forth below:

Change Order 12- Accessible Restroom Faucet Replacement The original contract sum was: $480,700.00
The contract sum prior to this Change Order was:
$1,119.25
683
TPM Construction Inc
Fire Station 43 Tenant Improvement Project
Proposed Change Order #12 - Accessible Restroom Faucet Replacement Date: 11/21/2024 Material
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
$0.00
$0.00
Tax
Freight
Mark Up 15% $0.00
Total Material $0.00
Engineering, Shop Drawings, Rental Equipment
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Mark Up 15% $0.00
Total Equipment $0.00
Labor
Description Man Hours Cost Per Man Hour Subtotal
Supervision Extended supervision cost associated with
extended project duration 4 $86.00 $344.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Labor Burden -
Mark Up 15% $51.60
Total Labor $395.60
Subcontractors
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
Perrys Plumbing Remove and replace existing faucet with new faucet which will not hit on mirror 1 $623.51 $623.51
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Mark Up 5% $31.18
Total
Subcontracted
Cost $654.69
Sub-Total $1,050.29
Bond (3%) $31.51
Liability (.9%) $9.45
Extended Duration $28
Bond &
Insurance Cost $68.96
Total Cost $1,119.25
Time Extension Requested 1 Working Days
684

OTHER DIRECT COSTS
ITEM Quan Rate Total
Project Management $110.00 $0.00
Project Coordinator $60.00 $0.00
Superintendent 4 $86.00 $344.00
Accounts $40.00 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL, OTHER DIRECT COSTS= $344
685

EQUIPMENT AND TOOL USE
EQUIPMENT Rate Period Quan/Dur Cost
$0
Automobile $25.00 Day $0
Pick-up Truck $28.00 Day 1 $28
Stake-Body truck $30.00 Day $0
Truck 1 1/2 Ton $34.00 Day $0
Truck 1 1/2 Ton W/A - Frame and Winch $36.00 Day $0
Flat Bed Truck - 2 Ton $500.00 Day $0
Hydralift Truck $56.00 Day $0
6' Ladder $6.00 Day $0
8' Ladder $8.00 Day $0
10' Ladder $10.00 Day $0
12' Ladder $12.00 Day $0
16' Ladder $14.00 Day $0
Cut-Off Saw $10.00 Day $0
Generator Rental $500.00 Mo $0
Trailer $30.00 Day $0
Grader $2,800.00 Mo $0
Backhoe $350.00 Day $0
Scissor Lift SL-22 Electric High Reach $75.00 Day $0
Knuckle Boom TBA-50R-Gas $120.00 Day $0
Project Toilet $200.00 Mo $0
Power Hand Tools $14.00 Day $0
Dumpster $1,000.00 Ls $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Equipment and Tool Use = $0
Gas and Oil Usage = $28
686
CA LIC #: 989585
DIR #:1001164653
Change Order
Job name: Fire Station 43 Prepared by: Nick Perry
Contractor name: TPM Construction Phone number: 916-947-5686 Job address: 1561 Harbor Blvd Email: [email protected] Date: 11/21/2024 Mailing address: 925 U Street Rio Linda Change Order amount: $623.51 CA 95673
CHANGE ORDER #5:

INCLUDES:
● Labor & Material to install a new faucet in the accessible RR requested by architect.

Breakdown:
● Faucet: $229.68
● Labor: 2.5 hours @ $125.00/hr= $312.50
Profit & OH @ 15%: $81.33
687

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 15, 2025 ITEM #9
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TO FIRESTATIONFURNITURE.COM FOR

THE PURCHASE OF NEW STORAGE LOCKERS AND ASSEMBLY FOR STORAGE LOCKERS FOR FIREFIGHTER PPE PROJECT (CIP 51045)
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Megan Gideon, Project Manager I
Capital Projects Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to award a contract to FireStationFurniture.com for the procurement, delivery, and assembly of new storage lockers for the Storage Lockers for Firefighter PPE Project (CIP 51045).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Find that the Storage Lockers for Firefighter PPE project is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to the Categorical Exemption under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 19, Section 15301 (Existing Facilities); 2) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to approve and execute a services contract with FireStationFurniture.com in an amount not to exceed $55,783.38; 3) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the services contract, with approval from the City Attorney; 4) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, non-substantive changes or modifications, amendments, change orders, agreements, and/or purchases up to 15% ($8,367.50) of the total contract amount; and 5) Delegate authority to the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to extend the term of the contract, if necessary.

BACKGROUND
Firefighter personal protective equipment (PPE), commonly known as turnout gear, is vital to the safety and effectiveness of our fire personnel. Each firefighter is issued two complete sets of PPE, each costing approximately $6,500. This specialized gear, designed to withstand extreme conditions, consists of an outer shell, a moisture barrier, and a thermal liner.

Currently, four of the city’s five fire stations (excluding Station 45) use outdated, narrow, school-style lockers to store this critical equipment. These lockers, inherited from the school district decades ago, lack ventilation and are not designed for firefighting gear. Proper storage is essential to allow PPE to dry and off-gas between uses, significantly reducing deterioration and extending its lifespan.

With West Sacramento Fire Department (WSFD) firefighters responding to historically high levels of fire incidents, our PPE is being used more frequently than ever. Manufacturer guidelines and industry best practices emphasize that PPE requires adequate space and ventilation to "breathe," dry out, and off-gas properly. Without this, moisture and contaminants trapped in the gear accelerate material breakdown, resulting in increased replacement costs and reduced safety for our firefighters.

This proposal seeks approval to replace the current inadequate lockers with purpose-built PPE storage systems that offer proper ventilation, drying, and off-gassing capabilities. Investing in these lockers will ensure the longevity and effectiveness of our PPE, safeguarding both our firefighters and the city’s financial resources.

ANALYSIS
FireStationFurniture.com was selected for this purchase due to their ability to provide custom-built lockers designed to accommodate two sets of turnout gear and wildland gear, a capability not offered by other manufacturers. The City has a history of successful procurement with this company, having purchased furniture from them in previous years. Additionally, FireStationFurniture.com is a participant in the Virginia Sheriff’s Association First Responders Supplies & Equipment Procurement Program, a cooperative bid initiative that offers discounted pricing to local government agencies. Through this program, the City is benefiting from significant cooperative pricing discounts without any registration fees or additional costs. 688
Consideration of Award of Contract to firestationfurniture.com for the Purchase of New Storage Lockers (CIP 51045) January 15, 2025

Page 2 ends

Environmental Considerations
The Storage Lockers for Firefighter PPE project is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to the Categorical Exemption under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1. Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. A Notice of Exemption (NOE) will be filed, if this item is approved.

Commission Recommendation
Not Applicable.

Alternatives
The Council’s primary alternatives are summarized below:
1) Approve the recommended actions as described above in this report. 2) Reject the recommended actions, or direct staff to alter the recommended actions. 3) Defer or cancel the project.

Alternatives 2 and 3 are not recommended because without approval firefighters will continue using inappropriate, unventilated lockers, leading to accelerated PPE degradation, higher replacement costs, and reduced safety. Alternative 1 will ensure compliance with best practices, protecting the city’s investment in critical safety equipment, and supporting the health and safety of the city’s firefighters.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department in coordination with and reviewed by the Fire Department and the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
The Storage lockers for Firefighter PPE project (CIP 51045), included in the City’s current Capital Improvement Program (CIP), has a total appropriation of $75,000 of General Facilities Fund. Adequate funding currently exists within the CIP project budget for this services contract award and no additional funds are being requested.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Contract with FireStationFurniture.com

2. Vicinity Map

3. Notice of Exemption (NOE)
689
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025
1 11.4.2024

CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT is made on January 15, 2025, by and between the CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (“City”), and FireStationFurniture.com (“Consultant”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the City desires to obtain the purchase and installation of appropriate storage lockers for firefighter personal protective equipment; WHEREAS, the Consultant has presented a proposal for such services to the City, dated November 12th, 2024, (attached hereto as Exhibit “A”) and is duly licensed, qualified and experienced to perform those services;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES:

A. Consultant shall do all work, attend all meetings, produce all reports and carry out all activities necessary to completion of the services described in Exhibit “A”. This Contract and its exhibits shall be known as the “Contract Documents.” Terms set forth in any Contract Document shall be deemed to be incorporated in all Contract Documents as if set forth in full therein. In the event of conflict between terms contained in these Contract Documents, the more specific term shall control. If any portion of the Contract Documents shall be in conflict with any other portion, provisions contained in the Contract shall govern over conflicting provisions contained in the exhibits to the Contract.

Consultant enters into this Contract as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City. The Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Contract to bind the City in any respect. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to be inconsistent with this relationship or status. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by the Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the Consultant and not of the City. The City shall not be obligated in any way to pay any wage claims or other claims made against Consultant by any such employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, or any other person resulting from performance of this Contract. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City. Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, To the greatest extent permitted by law, Consultant and its employees, agents, and subcontractors shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for 690
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025
2 11.4.2024
PERS benefits.

B. The Consultant agrees it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

2. TERM OF CONTRACT
A. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Contract by the City, and shall be undertaken and completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “A” and terminate on December 31st, 2025.

B. Consultant’s failure to complete work in accordance with the Schedule of Performance may result in delayed compensation as described in Section 3.

C. The City Manager or his or her designee may, by written instrument signed by the Parties, extend the duration of this Contract in the manner provided in Section 5, provided that the extension does not require the payment of compensation in excess of the Council approved budget.

3. COMPENSATION:

A. The Consultant shall be paid at the completion of services for the actual fees, costs and expenses for all time and materials required and expended, but in no event shall total compensation exceed a total of $55,783.38, without City’s prior written approval. Consultant's fees shall be as specified in the Schedule of Fees, which is attached hereto an incorporated herein as Exhibit "A".

B. Said amount shall be paid upon submittal of a final billing. Consultant shall furnish City with invoices for all expenses as well as for all materials authorized by this Contract. The invoices shall be submitted with the final billings. If Consultant’s performance is not in conformity with the Schedule of Performance, payments may be delayed or denied, unless the Consultant’s failure to perform in conformity with the Schedule of Performance is a documented result of the City’s failure to conform with the Schedule of Performance, or if the Schedule of Performance is extended pursuant to Section 5.

C. If the work is halted at the request of the City, compensation shall be based upon the proportion that the work performed bears to the total work required by this Contract, subject to Section 4.

4. TERMINATION:

A. This Contract may be terminated by either party, provided that the other party is given not less than 30 calendar days’ written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate.

B. The City may temporarily suspend this Contract, at no additional cost to City, provided that the Consultant is given written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of temporary suspension. If City gives such notice of temporary suspension, Consultant shall immediately suspend its activities under this Contract. 691
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025
3 11.4.2024
C. Notwithstanding any provisions of this Contract, Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Contract by Consultant, and the City may withhold any payments due to Consultant until such time as the exact amount of damages, if any, due the City from Consultant is determined.

D. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be compensated as provided for in this Contract, except as provided in Section 4C. Upon termination, the City shall be entitled to all work, including but not limited to, appraisals, inventories, studies, analyses, drawings and data estimates performed to that date in accordance with Section 7 hereof.

5. AMENDMENTS, CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS:

Amendments, changes or modifications in the terms of this Contract may be made at any time by mutual written agreement between the parties hereto and shall be signed by the persons authorized to bind the parties hereto.

6. EXTENSIONS OF TIME:

Consultant may, for good cause, request extensions of time to perform the services required hereunder. Such extensions shall be authorized in advance by the City in writing and shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Contract or the attached Work Program in the manner provided in Section 5.

7. PROPERTY OF CITY:

A. It is mutually agreed that all materials prepared by the Consultant under this Contract shall become the property of the City, and the Consultant shall have no property right therein whatsoever. Immediately upon termination, the City shall be entitled to, and the Consultant shall deliver to the City, all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and other such materials as may have been prepared or accumulated to date by the Consultant in performing this Contract which is not Consultant’s privileged information, as defined by law, or Consultant’s personnel information, along with all other property belonging exclusively to the City which is in the Consultant’s possession.

B. Additionally, it is agreed that the parties intend this to be a contract for services and each considers the products and results of the services to be rendered by Consultant hereunder (the “Work”) to be a work made for hire. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that the Work (and all rights therein, including, without limitation, copyright) belongs to and shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City.

8. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS:

A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of federal, State and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Contract.

B. Consultant warrants to the City that it is licensed by all applicable governmental bodies to perform this Contract and will remain so licensed throughout the progress of the Work, and that it has, and will have, throughout the progress of the Work, the necessary experience, skill and financial resources to enable it to perform this Contract. 692
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025
4 11.4.2024

9. WARRANTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - CONSULTANT:

A. Consultant agrees and represents that it is qualified to properly provide the services set forth in Exhibit “A” in a manner which is consistent with the generally accepted standards of Consultant’s profession.

B. Consultant agrees and represents that the work performed under this Contract shall be in accordance with applicable federal, State and local law in accordance with Section 17A hereof.

C. Consultant shall designate a project manager who at all times shall represent the Consultant before the City on all matters relating to this Contract. The project manager shall continue in such capacity unless and until he or she is removed at the request of the City, is no longer employed by Consultant, or is replaced with the written approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

D. Consultant shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for services which fail to meet the above professional and legal standards and which are reported to Consultant in writing within sixty (60) days of discovery. Should Consultant fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations, the City may render or undertake performance thereof and the Consultant shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred.

10. SUBCONTRACTING:

None of the services covered by this Contract shall be subcontracted without the prior written consent of the City, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Consultant shall be as fully responsible to the City for the negligent acts and omissions of its contractors and subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as it is for the negligent acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant.

11. ASSIGNABILITY:

Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Contract whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of the City which will not be unreasonably withheld.

However, claims for money due or to become due Consultant from the City under this Contract may be assigned to a financial institution, or to a trustee in bankruptcy, without such approval.

Notice of any assignment or transfer whether voluntary or involuntary shall be furnished promptly to the City.

12. INTEREST IN CONTRACT:

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any of its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the subject of the Contract, nor any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant shall make all disclosures required by the City’s conflict of interest code in accordance with the category designated by the City, unless the City Manager determines in writing that Consultant’s duties are more limited in scope than is warranted by the category designated by the City code and that a narrower disclosure category should apply. Consultant also agrees to make disclosure in compliance with the City conflict of interest code if, at any time after the execution of this Contract, City determines and notifies Consultant in writing that Consultant’s duties under this Contract warrant greater disclosure by 693
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025
5 11.4.2024
Consultant than was originally contemplated. Consultant shall make disclosures in the time, place and manner set forth in the conflict of interest code and as directed by the City.

13. MATERIALS CONFIDENTIAL:

All of the materials prepared or assembled by Consultant pursuant to performance of this Contract are confidential and Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City, except by court order.

14. LIABILITY OF CONSULTANT-NEGLIGENCE:

Consultant shall be responsible for performing the work under this Contract in a manner which is consistent with the generally-accepted standards of the Consultant’s profession and shall be liable for its own negligence and the negligent acts of its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors. The City shall have no right of control over the manner in which the work is to be done but only as to its outcome, and shall not be charged with the responsibility of preventing risk to Consultant or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors.

15. INDEMNITY AND LITIGATION COSTS:

Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, agents, and employees against all claims, damages, demands, liability, costs, losses and expenses, including without limitation court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising from Consultant's negligent acts or negligent failure to act, errors, omissions or willful misconduct incident to the performance of this Contract except such loss or damage caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive termination or suspension of this Contract.

16. CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE INSURANCE:

A. Consultant shall not commence any work before obtaining, and shall maintain in force at all times during the duration and performance of this Contract, the policies of insurance specified in this Section. Such insurance must have the approval of the City as to limit, form, and amount, and shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A VII (an NR rating is acceptable for Worker’s Compensation insurance written with the State Compensation Insurance Fund of California).

B. Prior to execution of this Contract and prior to commencement of any work, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and copies of endorsements providing evidence of coverage for all policies required by the Contract. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall, at their expense, maintain in effect at all times during the performance of work under the Contract not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policy satisfactory to the City. The maintenance by Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors of the following coverage and limits of insurance is a material element of this Contract. The failure of Consultant or of any of its contractors or subcontractors to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of this Contract. Approval of the insurance by the City shall not relieve or decrease any liability of Consultant.

1. Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance 694
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025
6 11.4.2024
a. Worker’s Compensation - Insurance to protect the Consultant, its contractors and subcontractors from all claims under Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Acts, including Longshoremen’s and Harbor Worker’s Act (“Acts”), if applicable. Such coverage shall be maintained, in type and amount, in strict compliance with all applicable state and Federal statutes and regulations.

The Consultant shall execute a certificate in compliance with Labor Code Section 1861, on the form provided in the Contract Documents.
b. Consultant shall provide a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant.

2. Commercial General Liability Insurance
a. The insurance shall be provided on form CG0001, or it’s equivalent, and shall include coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage arising out of premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual liability, and subconsultant’s work and personal and advertising injury resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general and products/completed operations aggregates. b. The commercial general liability insurance shall also include the following:
i. Endorsement equivalent to CG 2010 0714 naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds. The endorsement shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
ii. Endorsement stating insurance provided to the City shall be primary as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and any insurance or self insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it, to the payment or satisfaction of any defense expenses, loss, or judgment.
iii. Provision or endorsement stating that the Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
nm

3. Commercial Automobile Insurance
a. The insurance shall include, but shall not be limited to, coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage for owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the 695
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025
7 11.4.2024
insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000.00 per accident.
b. The commercial automobile insurance shall include the same endorsements required for the commercial general liability policy (see Section

16.B.2.b).

4. Professional Liability. The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall secure and maintain in full force, during the term of this Contract and for five years thereafter, professional liability insurance policies appropriate to the respective professions and the work to be performed as specified in this Contract. The limits of such professional liability insurance coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000 per claim.

C. In addition to any other remedy the City may have, if Consultant fails to maintain the insurance coverage as required in this Section, the City may obtain such insurance coverage as is not being maintained, in form and amount substantially the same as is required herein, and the City may deduct the cost of such insurance from any amounts due or which may become due Consultant under this Contract.

D. No policy required by this Contract shall be suspended, cancelled, terminated by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits unless Consultant has provided thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City.

E. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions in excess of $10,000 must be declared to, and approved by, the City.

F. The requirement as to types, limits, and the City’s approval of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant are not intended to, and shall not in any manner, limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations assumed by Consultant under the Contract.

17. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:

A. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of, shall observe and comply with, and shall cause any and all persons, firms or corporations employed by it or under its control to observe and comply with, applicable federal, state, county and municipal laws, ordinances, regulations, orders and decrees which in any manner affect those engaged or employed on the work described by this Contract or the materials used or which in any way affect the conduct of the work.

B. Consultant shall not engage in unlawful employment discrimination. Such unlawful employment discrimination includes, but is not limited to, employment discrimination based upon a person’s race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, gender, citizenship, or sexual orientation.

C. Consultant shall maintain and make available for inspection by the City and its auditors accurate records of all of its costs, disbursements and receipts with respect to any work under this Contract. Such inspections may be made during regular office hours at any time until six (6) months after the final payments under this Contract are made to the Consultant. 696
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025
8 11.4.2024
D. This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relative to the services specified herein and no modification hereof shall be effective unless and until such modification is evidenced by a writing signed by both parties to this Contract. There are no understandings, agreements, conditions, representations, warranties or promises, with respect to this Contract, except those contained in or referred to in the writing.

E. All notices that are required to be given by one party to the other under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered personally or enclosed in a properly addressed envelope and deposited in a United States Post Office for delivery by registered or certified mail addressed to the parties at the following addresses:

City: City of West Sacramento
Attn to: Ariana Adame
1110 West Capitol Avenue, 1st Floor
West Sacramento, CA 95691
[email protected]
Consultant:

FireStationFurniture.com
Attn to: Brandon Dunn
PO Box 1310
Mebane, NC 27302
[email protected]
H. This Contract shall be interpreted and governed by the laws of the State of California.

I. Any action arising out of this Contract shall be brought and maintained in Yolo County California, regardless of where else venue may lie.

J. In any action brought by either party to enforce the terms of this Contract, each party shall be bear responsibility for its attorney’s fees and all costs regardless of whether one party is determined to be the prevailing party.

K. ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF CONTRACT AND SIGNATURE. By electronically signing this document in electronic form, Parties agree that this Agreement may be transmitted and signed electronically by all Parties, and that such signatures shall have the same force and effect as original signatures, in accordance with California law and regulations, including but not limited to Civil Code Section 1633.7
[Signatures on following page]
697
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025
9 11.4.2024

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
By: __________________________
Amanda Berlin, Assistant City Manager
ATTEST:

By: _______________________
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _______________________
Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney
FireStationFurniture.com
By: _________________________
Brandon Dunn, Founder and President
698
DATE EXPIRATION QUOTE #
11/12/2024 1/7/2025 12570
PO #
Quote
Working Fire Furniture & Mattress Co. Inc.

PO Box 1310
Mebane NC 27302 US
[email protected]
855-956-3473

ITEM LIST QTY EACH AMOUNT

SHIP TO
Scott Pfeifer
West Sacramento Fire Dept
2040 Lake Washington Blvd
West Sacramento CA 95691

BILL TO
Scott Pfeifer
West Sacramento Fire Dept
2040 Lake Washington Blvd
West Sacramento CA 95691
P-PatTO
Patriot Metal Turnout Locker 36x24x72 722 Patriot Red Full top shelf Full removable bottom shelf (Bulk Discount) 33.00 1,045.99 34,517.67
P-PatTO
Patriot Metal Turnout Locker 24x24x72 722 Patriot Red Full top shelf Full removable bottom shelf (Bulk Discount) 11.00 925.49 10,180.39
Discount-SA Co-Op
Co-Op Purchasing Program Discount (VSA Sheriffs Association) 1.00 -2,681.88 -2,681.88 Installation
Ground level installation only (no stairs) 1.00 8,500.00 8,500.00 Storage lockers are made to order and ship in 8-10 weeks.

Delivery to a business address is made by common carrier and includes customer offloading (lift gate is an extra cost and must specifically be requested). Please let us know if other arrangements are needed prior to placing your order.

NOTE - shipping times are estimates only and may vary based on the current supply chain and production capabilities. Actual delivery times are determined by the carrier and can vary based on the geographic location of the delivery. **Quote includes full top shelf, removable bottom shelf and number plate** TOTAL USD 55,783.38
SUBTOTAL 50,516.18
SHIPPING 5,267.20
699
Schedule of Performance
Contract Start Date 1/15/2025
Contract End Date 12/31/2025
700
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025

EXHIBIT C
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR CODE § 3700
[Labor Code § 1861]
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.

FireStationFurniture.com
By:

Brandon Dunn, Founder and President
701
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025

EXHIBIT D

LABOR COMPLIANCE

1. PREVAILING WAGE
A. The Work contemplated herein constitutes a public work within the meaning of Labor Code sections 1720 and 1771. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and upon any Subcontractor, to pay not less than the said specified prevailing rates of wages to all workers employed by them under the Contract in accordance with Labor Code section 1774. The Director of the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR") of the State of California has determined the general prevailing rate of wages of per diem wages in the locality in which the work is to be performed for each craft or type of worker needed to execute the Contract. The Consultant acknowledges that it has examined the prevailing rate of per diem wages as established by the DIR. Copies of the current schedules for prevailing wages are on file at City Hall, and the contents of those schedules are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. The Consultant shall post a copy of the applicable prevailing wage determinations at each job site, along with any other work place posters required by law.

B. The City will not recognize any claims for additional compensation because of the payment of prevailing wages. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by the Consultant in determining its proposal, and will not under any circumstances be considered as the basis of a claim against the City.

C. By executing this Contract Consultant warrants that it has registered with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with Labor Code section 1725.5.

2. PREVAILING WAGE RECORDS
A. The Consultant and each subcontractor shall keep an accurate payroll record which shows the name, address, social security number, correct work classification (in accordance with the wage decision), both straight and overtime worked each day and week, and hourly rate of pay, gross wages earned, deductions made and net wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker or other employee paid by the Consultant /subcontractor in connection with the Work. These payroll records shall be certified and shall be made available at Consultant's principal office. These records shall be maintained during the course of the Work.

The Consultant and all subcontractors shall make the certified payroll records available for inspection by City representatives upon request and shall permit such representatives to interview employees during the work hours on the job site.

B. The City shall notify the Consultant in writing of any discrepancies or violations that are discovered during such inspections. Written notification pursuant to this Section shall include the actions that will be necessary to resolve the discrepancies and/or violations. The Consultant shall be held entirely responsible for the prompt resolution of all non-compliances with the prevailing wage laws, including those pertaining to all subcontractors and any lower-tier subcontractors. The Consultant shall forfeit as penalty to the City the amount specified by law for each calendar day or portion thereof for each worker (whether employed by the Consultant or any subcontractor) paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under the Contract in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code and in particular, Section 1775. 702
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025
C. To the extent applicable, Consultant and subcontractors shall maintain and furnish to the Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR"), a certified copy of each weekly payroll (but no less often than monthly), with a statement of compliance signed under penalty of perjury. Such certified payroll reports shall be transmitted electronically to the DIR.

D. The City will not recognize any claims for additional compensation because of the payment of the prevailing wages. The possibility of wage increases is one of the elements to be considered by the Consultant in entering into the Contract, and will not under any circumstances, other than delays caused by the City, or the City’s agents, be considered as the basis of a claim against the City.

3. Labor Discrimination
Attention is directed to Section 1735 of the Labor Code, which reads as follows:
“No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of their race, color, national origin or ancestry, physical handicap, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such person, except as provided in Section 12940 of the Government Code, and every General Contractor for public works violating this section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of this chapter.”
4 Eight-Hour Day Limitation
(a) In accordance with the provisions of the Labor Code, and in particular, Sections 1810 to 1815 thereof, inclusive, incorporated herein by reference, eight hours labor shall constitute a day's work, and no worker in the employ of Consultant, or any Subcontractor, doing or contracting to do any part of the work contemplated by the Contract, shall be required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of those provisions; provided that subject to Labor Code Section 1815, a worker may perform work in excess of either eight (8) hours per day or forty (40) hours during any one week upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day or forty (40) hours during any one week at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay.
(b) The Consultant and each Subcontractor shall also keep an accurate record showing the names and actual hours worked of all workers employed by them in connection with the Contract. This record shall be open at all reasonable hours to the inspection of the City. It is hereby further agreed that, except as provided in (a) above, the Consultant shall forfeit as a penalty to the City the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of the Contract by the Consultant or by any of its Subcontractors for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in and one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of Sections 1810 through 1815.

5. Compliance with State Requirements for Employment of Apprentices (a) The Consultant's attention is directed to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code.

Provisions of said Section pertaining to employment of registered apprentices are hereby incorporated by reference into this Contract. As applicable, the Consultant or any Subcontractor 703
FireStationFurniture.com
FIR24-324 Storage Lockers& Installation for Firefighter PPE Expires on 12/31/2025
employed by the Consultant in the performance of this Contract shall take such actions as necessary to comply with the provisions of Section 1777.5. 704
2 705
..i:I ,._
iu Cl .jJ
Attachment A
t--------'--------+--- Vl M-arsh-all-Rd-----------...J
FIRE
STATION 42
i---------------------:�--�----------A-a- v+s-R·a--------L----------1 0 c::::J Project Limit
- Interstate
- Major Road
-- Minor Road
N
A
200
FEET
1-------M•iHe·r-E-------

STORAGE LOCKERS FOR FIREFIGHTER PPE

PROJECT VICINITY MAP
400 Fire Station 42, located on the intersection of Jefferson Blvd and Davis Rd.

X
CITY
WEST

SACRAMENTO
Prepared on
12/9/2024 by
Cierras
Capital Projects
Department
City of West
706 Sacramento
707
708

Statutory Exemptions. State code number:

_______________________________________________
Notice of Exemption Appendix E
To: Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency): ____________________________ P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 _______________________________________________ Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 County Clerk
(Address)
___________________________
___________________________
County of: __________________
Project Title: ____________________________________________________________________________ Project Applicant: ________________________________________________________________________ Project Location - Specific:

Project Location - City: ______________________ Project Location - County:

Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:
_____________________
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: _____________________________________________________ Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: ________________________________________________ Exempt Status: (check one):

Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
Reasons why project is exempt:

Lead Agency
Contact Person: ____________________________ Area Code/Telephone/Extension: _______________ If filed by applicant:

1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.

2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: ____________________________ Date:

Signed by Lead Agency Signed by Applicant
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code. Date Received for filing at OPR:

Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. _______________
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: ____________________________________ ______________________________________________
______________ Title: _______________________
709 Revised 2011

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 15, 2025 ITEM #10
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 25-5 AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET AND APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS 11-14 TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR TORRES PROJECT MANAGEMENT, INC. FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP 51033) INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [ X ] Staff
[ ] Other
Jamie Teske, Senior Project Manager
Capital Projects Department
ATTACHMENT [ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to adopt Resolution 25-5 amending the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and approval of change orders 11-14 to the Torres Project Management, Inc. construction contract for the Police Department Tenant Improvement project (CIP 51033).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Adopt Resolution 25-5 amending the Capital Improvement Program budget; 2) Approve change orders 11-14 to the construction contract with Torres Project Management, Inc. in the amount of $31,372.86 for the Police Department TI project; 3) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute change orders 11-14; 4) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute any contract amendments or change orders up to an additional $10,000 in contingency; and
5) Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute non-substantive changes or modifications to the construction contract, with approval from the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND
The Police Department headquarters has been located at 550 Jefferson Boulevard since 1995. The headquarters building was conceived as an interim facility to suit the Police Department’s staffing needs for five to ten years. As expected, staff outgrew the existing building, and in 2005, the City entered into a lease agreement to occupy a portion of the adjacent building at 1025 Triangle Court, Suite 100, in West Sacramento. (Annex Facility).

In 2007, the Police Department leased additional space in the Annex Facility, and in 2009, entered into a lease agreement to occupy the entire property (19,477 square feet). This property provides space for the Department’s volunteer program, property and evidence storage, and the bike patrol program. It houses the Department’s specialty unit vehicles and equipment, such as the mobile command unit, SWAT vehicle, bomb squad robot and accoutrements, and provides space for training and general storage.

Over the past several years, City facilities maintenance staff have made several significant repairs within the Police Headquarters Building due to deferred maintenance and normal wear and tear. It has become apparent that these issues will continue, resulting in additional costs until the deferred maintenance items have been addressed. The deferred maintenance improvements to be addressed involve new interior painting, updated flooring, improved acoustic soundproofing for the interview rooms, kitchen and restroom ADA-compliant improvements, and increased storage within the armory room. All workstations, furniture, and storage have reached the end of their usual life and will be replaced with modern and efficient storage and configuration to accommodate necessary space for the increasing workforce.

On May 1, 2024, the City Council entered into a construction contract with Torres Project Management, Inc. for the Police Department Tenant Improvement project. The project has reached substantial completion and is on track for final completion in early 2025.
710
Construction Contract for Torres Project Management Construction, Inc. for the Police Department Tenant Improvement Project January 15, 2025

Page 2 ends

ANALYSIS
The project is in the construction phase, and during this time, additional items were identified that needed to be addressed to complete the project. Specifically, revisions were made to the armory to add additional useful storage space, as well as identifying offices needing new flooring, paint, and furniture. These updates were identified as necessary to ensure the facility meets the operational needs of the department and is completed successfully.

Environmental Considerations
The Police Department Tenant Improvement project is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to the Categorical Exemption under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1. Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.

Commission Recommendation
Not Applicable.

Strategic Plan Integration
Not applicable.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Capital Projects Department and has been coordinated with and reviewed by the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
The Police Department Tenant Improvement project (51033) is included in the City’s current Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Staff is requesting a funding allocation of $100,000, from the General Facilities Fund (208) to address the shortfall, as the existing project budget does not have sufficient funding to cover change orders 11-14 with Torres Project Management, Inc., as well as additional staff time and project closeout items.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution 25-5

2. Change orders 11-14 with Torres Project Management, Inc. 711
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 25-5

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

APPROVING A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET AMENDMENT TO

FULLY FUND THE POLICE STATION TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP 51033) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24
WHEREAS, the City Council amended the biennial Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for Fiscal Years 2021/22 and 2022/2023 on December 8, 2021; and WHEREAS, CIP- 51033 – Police Station TI Project was established, and appropriations of $850,000 from the General Facilities Fund were approved to fund the project; and
WHEREAS, on February 23, 2024, the Capital Projects Department conducted a competitive bid to select a contractor for the Police Department TI Project and staff determined that TPM Construction, Inc. is the lowest-cost, responsive, qualified bidder, with a total bid of $601,570; and
WHEREAS, additional funding of $100,000 is needed to fund change orders 11-14 to the construction contract with TPM Construction, Inc., including additional contingency of $10,000, additional staff time/ICAP and additional project close out items; and WHEREAS, staff is proposing to appropriate $100,000 from the General Facilities Fund (208); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all information related to this matter, as presented at the public meetings of the City Council identified herein, including any supporting reports by City staff, and any other information provided during public meetings; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento as follows:

1. The City Council hereby approves amendments to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the 2024/25 fiscal year as listed below:

SOURCES
$100,000 400-9900-4990/400-51033-4990 Transfer from General Facilities Fund $100,000 208-0000-3110 General Facilities Fund Balance
$100,000.00 TOTAL SOURCES
USES
$100,000 208-9910-5950 Transfer from General Facilities Fund $100,000 400-9900-5530/400-51033-5800 Police Department TI Project $100,000.00 TOTAL USES
*Note: Interfund transfers not included in total to avoid duplication of total costs.

2. The City Council hereby finds that the facts set forth in the recitals to this Resolution are true and correct and establish the factual basis for the City Council’s adoption of this Resolution.

3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the West Sacramento City Council this 15th day of January 2025, by the following vote:
712
Resolution 25-5

Page 2 of 2 ends

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
713
CPC24-095 Request Date: 10/30/2024
P0170226 Change Order # 11
Council Date 1/15/2025
Vendor:

Project:

Submitted by: Contractor Reviewed by: Division Manager/Department Head Jonathan Torres, Owner Jai Chahal, Const. & Facilities Development Manager Date [email protected]
Reviewed by: Project Manager Approved by:

Jamie Teske, Senior Project Manager Aaron Laurel, City Manager Date Approved as to form: Attest:

Jeff Mitchell, City Attorney Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Date

CHANGE ORDER
Cost Center #
400-9900-5530 / 400-51033-5866
Net change by previous Change Orders:

Torres Project Management, Inc (V021631)
Police Department Tenant Improvement Project
Description:
$80,858.83
$682,428.83
Upon mutual acceptance of this document the City of West Sacramento, hereinafter referred to as "City"' and your firm, hereinafter referred to a "Contractor", in accordance with the terms and conditions of the original contract documents, you are hereby directed to make the following change or changes for the consideration set forth below:

Change order 11 - Phase 2 Furniture Disposal
The original contract sum was: $601,570.00
The contract sum prior to this Change Order was:
$2,413.77
Contracts initially approved by Council also require City Attorney and City Clerk Signatures Contract #
Purchase Order #
$684,842.60
The contract sum will be increased by this Change Order:

New contract sum including all Change Orders:
714
TPM CONSTRUCTION INC License # 1079394
Police Department Tenant Improvement Project
PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER # 11- Phase 2 Furniture Disposal
REVISED 10/30/2024

MATERIAL
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
Tax
Freight
Mark-Up 15%
Total Material
Engineering, shop drawings, Rental equip
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
Total Equip
LABOR
Description Units Prod Rate MH Cost/MH Subtotal
Total
Labor Burden
& markup 15%

0.00 Total Labor
Subcontractors
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Mark-Up 5%
Total Sub's
TOTAL $2,322.57
Bond (3%)
Liability (.9%)
Extended Duration
Bond & Ins. Costs
Total Cost $2,413.77
TIME EXTENSION REQUESTED = 0 Working days
NOTES:
$69.67
$21.53
$91.20
Demo Phase 2 Furniture
$217.62
$1,668.42
Laborer 18 $78.93 $157.86
Atlas Disposal Waste 1 $654.15 $654.15
$654.15
715
716
Project: 51033 - Police Department TI Project
550 Jefferson Blvd
West Sacramento, California 95605
Daily Log: Wednesday 9/11/2024
Daily Log Completed & Distributed
The Daily Log was completed and distributed by Marcos Lopez on Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 03:42 PM PDT.

WEATHER REPORT
Temperature Precipitation Since Humidity Windspeed
Low High Avg Midnight 2 Days Ago 3 Days Ago Low Avg High Dew Avg Max Gust 56°F 86°F 69°F 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 27% 59% 83% 52°F 7.3 mph 13 mph 26 mph

DAILY SNAPSHOT
06:00 AM 09:00 AM 12:00 PM 03:00 PM 06:00 PM 09:00 PM
Clear
58°F
Clear
60°F
Clear
74°F
Clear
85°F
Clear
85°F
Clear
71°F

OBSERVED WEATHER CONDITIONS
No. Time Observed Weather Delay Sky Temp Average Precipitation Wind Ground/Sea Calamity 1 02:15:00 PM No
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT LOG 3.0 Workers | 17.0 Total Hours No. Company Trade
Foreman Journeyman Apprentice Other
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
1 TPM Construction Inc. Demolition 0 0.0 2 16.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Comments: 1. Juan G Hernandez

2. Christian Hernandez
• removed all cubicles and desks from phase 1
• dumpster got smashed down
• these hours today were for the demo of cubicles and desks in phase 2 Created By: Marcos Lopez
2 TBK Electric Inc Electrical 0 0.0 1 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Comments: 1. Tho ly “jimmy”
• disconnected power poles in investigations office
Created By: Marcos Lopez
TOTAL 0 0 3 17 0 0 0 0

Page 1 of 3 ends

717
Daily Construction Report Log's Attachments:

1. TPM Construction Inc.
1726094338741.393066_tempImage.jpeg
1726094338811.789062_tempImage.jpeg
1726094338501.156982_tempImage.jpeg
1726094339013.934082_tempImage.jpeg
1726094338883.836914_tempImage.jpeg
1726094338673.704102_tempImage.jpeg
1726094338603.694824_tempImage.jpeg
1726094450249.444092_tempImage.jpeg

Page 2 of 3 ends

718
1726094338950.942871_tempImage.jpeg
By Date Copies To

Page 3 of 3 ends

719
Project: 51033 - Police Department TI Project
550 Jefferson Blvd
West Sacramento, California 95605
Daily Log: Thursday 9/12/2024
Daily Log Completed & Distributed
The Daily Log was completed and distributed by Marcos Lopez on Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 03:31 PM PDT.

WEATHER REPORT
Temperature Precipitation Since Humidity Windspeed
Low High Avg Midnight 2 Days Ago 3 Days Ago Low Avg High Dew Avg Max Gust 54°F 87°F 70°F 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 0.00 in. 19% 55% 92% 50°F 4.9 mph 11 mph 23 mph

DAILY SNAPSHOT
06:00 AM 09:00 AM 12:00 PM 03:00 PM 06:00 PM 09:00 PM
Clear
55°F
Clear
64°F
Clear
78°F
Clear
87°F
Clear
86°F
Clear
71°F

OBSERVED WEATHER CONDITIONS
No. Time Observed Weather Delay Sky Temp Average Precipitation Wind Ground/Sea Calamity 1 08:05:00 AM No
DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT LOG 2.0 Workers | 16.0 Total Hours No. Company Trade
Foreman Journeyman Apprentice Other
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
# of
Workers
Total
Hours
1 TPM Construction Inc. Demolition 0 0.0 2 16.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Comments: 1. Juan G Hernandez

2. Christian Hernandez
• demoed casework for csi lab
• demoed furniture from csi (1 hr)
• started to remove top layer of carpet
• demoed ceiling tiles
Created By: Marcos Lopez
TOTAL 0 0 2 16 0 0 0 0

Page 1 of 2 ends

720
Daily Construction Report Log's Attachments:

1. TPM Construction Inc.
1726180235475.989990_tempImage.jpeg
1726180240811.589844_tempImage.jpeg
1726180238503.740967_tempImage.jpeg
1726180237450.916016_tempImage.jpeg
1726180239665.319824_tempImage.jpeg
By Date Copies To

Page 2 of 2 ends

721
CPC24-095 Request Date: 11/6/2024
P0170226 Change Order # 12
Council Date 1/15/2025
Vendor:

Project:

Jamie Teske, Senior Project Manager Aaron Laurel, City Manager Date Approved as to form: Attest:

Jeff Mitchell, City Attorney Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Date Contracts initially approved by Council also require City Attorney and City Clerk Signatures Contract #
Purchase Order #
$698,365.73
The contract sum will be increased by this Change Order:

New contract sum including all Change Orders:

CHANGE ORDER
Cost Center #
400-9900-5530 / 400-51033-5866
Net change by previous Change Orders:

The time for performance of the Contract will increase 4 working days by reason of the work described by this Change Order. Except as herein above expressly provided, CONTRACTOR further agrees that the performance of the work specified in this Change Order or the rescheduling of other project work made necessary by this Change Order, shall not constitute a delay which will extend the time limit for completion of the work as said term is used in the Contract between CITY and CONTRACTOR for the project.

Torres Project Management, Inc (V021631)
Police Department Tenant Improvement Project
Description:
$83,272.60
$684,842.60
Upon mutual acceptance of this document the City of West Sacramento, hereinafter referred to as "City"' and your firm, hereinafter referred to a "Contractor", in accordance with the terms and conditions of the original contract documents, you are hereby directed to make the following change or changes for the consideration set forth below:

Change order 12 - Furnish and install flooring in additional rooms.

The original contract sum was: $601,570.00
The contract sum prior to this Change Order was:
$13,523.13
722
TPM CONSTRUCTION INC License # 1079394
Police Department Tenant Improvement Project
PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER # 12- ASI 05
REVISED 11/06/2024

0.00 Total Labor
Subcontractors
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
$1,650.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 Mark-Up 5%
Total Sub's
TOTAL $13,012.15
Bond (3%)
Liability (.9%)
Extended Duration
Bond & Ins. Costs
Total Cost $13,523.13
TIME EXTENSION REQUESTED = 4 Working days
NOTES:
$390.36
$120.62
$510.98
Demo Flooring
$94.71
$726.15
Laborer 8 $78.93 $631.44
CCF
Applied Finishes
Added Flooring
Added Painting
1 1
$9,950
$1,650
$9,950.00
Sunbelt Rentals Floor Scrapper 1 $106.00 $106.00
$106.00
$580.00
$12,180.00
723
November 4, 2024
RE: POLICE STATION TI
SUBJECT: Change Order 3
Capital Commercial Flooring has been requested to perform additional work above and beyond our contracted scope on the above referenced project. Costs associated with this change are below.

CHANGE ORDER:
1) Furnish and Install V3 accent band at room 169. The remaining floor material in Room 169 will remain v2 as contracted. Change closet floor material from V2 to V3.

Add material V3 to rooms 162, 163, 164. Add V2 material and specified 4” rubber base at room 141.

Materials: V3 Imperial Texture Perfect Storm 57551. V2 Imperial Texture Victoria Blue 59230 12x12 B1 - TARKETT, TRADITIONAL VINYL WALL COVE BASE, 4", BLACK #40 2) Please see the general job conditions and exclusions located on page 2 of this proposal. Unless otherwise noted all work bid is bound by the conditions set forth in this proposal.

Total Cost for Work……………………………………..……..………… $9,950
*************Please see attached sheet for general job condition requirements************** **********Our proposal includes freight, delivery and sales tax on applicable materials********** Sincerely,
Mathew Sena
Estimator Project Manager
[email protected]
724
725
726
2 Date: 11/5/2024
Project Name:

Reference/ Ticket#
To: Revision#
Revision Reference:

Attn:

DESCRIPTION

MATERIAL
QUAN. Per GAL DESCRITION TOTAL PRICE
3 $30.00 interior primer $90.00
4 $35.00 interior finish $140.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

SUBCONTRACTOR
QUAN. UNIT DESCRIPTION LIST TOTAL PRICE
$0.00
$0.00
QUAN. UNIT DESCRITION BASE RATE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE
1 EA. SUNDRIES $65.00 $65.00
EA. TRUCK FEE $0.00
EA. PARKING $0.00
EA. LIFT RENTAL $0.00

FIELD LABOR
QUAN. UNIT. DESCRIPTION BASE RATE TOTAL PRICE
8 HR(S) Apprentice $60.45 $483.60
8 HR(S) Journeyman $79.26 $634.08
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) Apprentice $60.45 $0.00
HR(S) Journeyman $79.26 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
MATERIAL SUB TOTAL $230.00
EQUIPTMENT SUB TOTAL $65.00
TAX $21.39
TOTAL MATERIAL & EQUIP. COST $316.39
TOTAL LABOR $1,117.68
TOTAL $1,434.07
15% O.H. & FEE LABOR $215.11
COR SUBTOTAL $1,650.00
CHANGE ORDER#:

Police Department TI
TPM
Jonathan Torres
1 coat primer and 2 coats finish to walls in room 141 & 162

EQUIPMENT/ MISC
X
TIME EXTENSION REQUIRED: ________________________
◊ WORK WILL PROCEED PER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS UNTIL OTHERWISE IN WRITING ◊ WORK HAS COMMENCED PER ____________________________DIRECTION ◊ WORK IN THIS AREA HAS CEASED PER___________________________________

DIRECTION, AND MAY BE CAUSE FOR ADDITIONAL TIME DELAYS AND OR COMPENSATION ACCEPTED: The above prices and specifications of this Change Request are hereby accepted. All work is to be performed under the same terms and conditions as specified in original contract unless otherwise stipulated.

GENTLEMAN: We hereby submit an itemized quotation, on this form, for a change in contract price incurred by modification to plans and or specifications listed below. One signed copy must be returned to this office no later than EOD so as not to cause additional expense and or delay.

Please forward this signed and dated form to Applied Finishes’ office. Work described above will proceed upon date of receipt.

PO Box 481
Chico, CA 95927
Phone (530) 345-1319
727
2 How to get your order
3 Optional plans
4 Job site information
Choose a store
SACRAMENTO PC338, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA, 95691 2148
Pickup and return time
Rental Start: Nov 11, 2024
Pickup time
Rental End: Nov 12, 2024
Return time
Who will pick up the items?
Save and continue
I'll pick it up Someone else will
Order summary
1 items
Taxes and fees will be calculated before rental
conNrmation.

Rental subtotal $96
Purchases subtotal -
In-store pickup Free
Rental protection plan -
Prepay Fuel Option -
Environmental Service Fee -
Other fees $1.92
Subtotal $97.92
Taxes $8.08
Estimated total $106
Back to cart
Available times Available times
728
CPC24-095 Request Date: 11/212024
P0170226 Change Order # 13
Council Date 1/15/2025
Vendor:

Project:

Jamie Teske, Senior Project Manager Aaron Laurel, City Manager Date Approved as to form: Attest:

Jeff Mitchell, City Attorney Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Date

CHANGE ORDER
Cost Center #
400-9900-5530 / 400-51033-5866
Net change by previous Change Orders:

Torres Project Management, Inc (V021631)
Police Department Tenant Improvement Project
Description:
$96,795.73
$698,365.73
Upon mutual acceptance of this document the City of West Sacramento, hereinafter referred to as "City"' and your firm, hereinafter referred to a "Contractor", in accordance with the terms and conditions of the original contract documents, you are hereby directed to make the following change or changes for the consideration set forth below:

Change order 13 - Lunch Room Electrical
The original contract sum was: $601,570.00
The contract sum prior to this Change Order was:
$4,641.00
Contracts initially approved by Council also require City Attorney and City Clerk Signatures Contract #
Purchase Order #
$703,006.73
The contract sum will be increased by this Change Order:

New contract sum including all Change Orders:
729
TPM Construction Inc
Police Department Tenant Improvement Project
Proposed Change Order #13 - Lunch Room Electrical Date: 11/21/2024 Material
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
5/8” Drywall, 90 Minute Fast Mud, Regular Joint Compound 1 $150.00 $150.00 $0.00
Tax
Freight
Mark Up 15% $22.50
Total Material $172.50
Engineering, Shop Drawings, Rental Equipment
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Mark Up 15% $0.00
Total Equipment $0.00
Labor
Description Man Hours Cost Per Man Hour Subtotal
Laborer Remove Existing Drywall 4 $78.93 $315.72
Drywaller Install & Finish New Drywall 16 $105.99 $1695.84 $0.00
$0.00
Labor Burden -
Mark Up 15% $301.73
Total Labor $2313.29
Subcontractors
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
TBK Electric Re-work existing electrical per PM direction 1 $1094.83 $1094.83 Applied Finishes Re-paint wall after modifications have been completed 1 $791.84 $791.84
$0.00
$0.00
Mark Up 5% $94.33
Total
Subcontracted
Cost $1981.00
Sub-Total $4,466.80
Bond (3%) $134.00
Liability (.9%) $40.20
Extended Duration
Bond &
Insurance Cost $174.21
Total Cost $4,641.00
Time Extension Requested 3 Working Days
730

OTHER DIRECT COSTS
ITEM Quan Rate Total
Project Management $110.00 $0.00
Project Coordinator $60.00 $0.00
Superintendent $120.00 $0.00
Accounts $40.00 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL, OTHER DIRECT COSTS= $0
731

EQUIPMENT AND TOOL USE
EQUIPMENT Rate Period Quan/Dur Cost
$0
Automobile $25.00 Day $0
Pick-up Truck $28.00 Day $0
Stake-Body truck $30.00 Day $0
Truck 1 1/2 Ton $34.00 Day $0
Truck 1 1/2 Ton W/A - Frame and Winch $36.00 Day $0
Flat Bed Truck - 2 Ton $500.00 Day $0
Hydralift Truck $56.00 Day $0
6' Ladder $6.00 Day $0
8' Ladder $8.00 Day $0
10' Ladder $10.00 Day $0
12' Ladder $12.00 Day $0
16' Ladder $14.00 Day $0
Cut-Off Saw $10.00 Day $0
Generator Rental $500.00 Mo $0
Trailer $30.00 Day $0
Grader $2,800.00 Mo $0
Backhoe $350.00 Day $0
Scissor Lift SL-22 Electric High Reach $75.00 Day $0
Knuckle Boom TBA-50R-Gas $120.00 Day $0
Project Toilet $200.00 Mo $0
Power Hand Tools $14.00 Day $0
Dumpster $1,000.00 Ls $0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Equipment and Tool Use = $0
Gas and Oil Usage = $0
732
Additional Work Proposal
T B K Electric Date: 11/21/24
Get Wired Invoice # 4
Reference # Relocate
existing receptacles
Bill to: Job: Police Department TI 550
Jefferson Blvd., West
Sacramento, CA 95605 Torres Project Management INC
555 N Lincoln St
Dixon, CA 95620
Description Labor Extention Materials Extention
Per request:

Relocate electrical in room 174 to accommodate garbage disposal and to match existing receptacle height on the same wall.

Labor: 6.00
Materials: 40 ft conduit, 120ft #12 THHN wires, 6 couplings, straps, etc… $ 229.00
Materials: 229.00
Taxes: 19.47
Labor: 6.00 $ 117.26 703.56
Subtotal: 952.03
Mark-up $ 142.80
Total: 1,094.83
Payment terms: 100% payment due within 30 days upon completetion of work. Make all checks payable to T B K Electric Thank you for your business!
3960 Lakeview Dr., Ione, CA 95640
733
Date: 11/20/2024
Project Name:

Reference/ Ticket#
To: Torres Project Management Revision#
Revision Reference:

Attn:

DESCRIPTION

MATERIAL
QUAN. Per GAL DESCRITION TOTAL PRICE
1 $28.00 Interior Primer $28.00
1 $35.00 Interior Finish $35.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

SUBCONTRACTOR
QUAN. UNIT DESCRIPTION LIST TOTAL PRICE
$0.00
$0.00
QUAN. UNIT DESCRITION BASE RATE UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE
1 EA. SUNDRIES $150.00 $150.00
EA. TRUCK FEE $0.00
EA. PARKING $0.00
EA. LIFT RENTAL $0.00

FIELD LABOR
QUAN. UNIT. DESCRIPTION BASE RATE TOTAL PRICE
6 HR(S) Journeyman $79.26 $475.56
HR(S)
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
HR(S) $0.00 $0.00
MATERIAL SUB TOTAL $63.00
EQUIPTMENT SUB TOTAL $150.00
TAX
TOTAL MATERIAL & EQUIP. COST $213.00
TOTAL LABOR $475.56
TOTAL $688.56
15% O.H. & FEE LABOR $103.28
COR SUBTOTAL $791.84
Jonathan Torres

EQUIPMENT/ MISC
X
CHANGE ORDER#:

Police Department TI
TIME EXTENSION REQUIRED: ________________________
 WORK WILL PROCEED PER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS UNTIL OTHERWISE IN WRITING  WORK HAS COMMENCED PER ____________________________DIRECTION  WORK IN THIS AREA HAS CEASED PER___________________________________

Please forward this signed and dated form to Applied Finishes’ office. Work described above will proceed upon date of receipt.

PO Box 481
Chico, CA 95927
Phone (530) 345-1319
734
CPC24-095 Request Date: 12/11/2024
P0170226 Change Order # 14
Council Date
Vendor:

Project:

Jamie Teske, Senior Project Manager Aaron Laurel, City Manager Date Approved as to form: Attest:

Jeff Mitchell, City Attorney Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Date

CHANGE ORDER
Cost Center #
400-9900-5530 / 400-51033-5866
Net change by previous Change Orders:

The time for performance of the Contract will increase 5 working days by reason of the work described by this Change Order. Except as herein above expressly provided, CONTRACTOR further agrees that the performance of the work specified in this Change Order or the rescheduling of other project work made necessary by this Change Order, shall not constitute a delay which will extend the time limit for completion of the work as said term is used in the Contract between CITY and CONTRACTOR for the project.

Torres Project Management, Inc (V021631)
Police Department Tenant Improvement Project
Description:
$101,436.73
$703,006.73
Upon mutual acceptance of this document the City of West Sacramento, hereinafter referred to as "City"' and your firm, hereinafter referred to a "Contractor", in accordance with the terms and conditions of the original contract documents, you are hereby directed to make the following change or changes for the consideration set forth below:

Change order 14 - armory revision
The original contract sum was: $601,570.00
The contract sum prior to this Change Order was:
$10,794.96
Contracts initially approved by Council also require City Attorney and City Clerk Signatures Contract #
Purchase Order #
$713,801.69
The contract sum will be increased by this Change Order:

New contract sum including all Change Orders:
1/15/2025
735
TPM Construction Inc
Police Department Tenant Improvement Project
Proposed Change Order #14 - Armory - ASI 06 Date: 12/11/2024 Material
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
5/8” Drywall 5 $24.00 $120.00
Drywall Compound + Sundries 5 $15.00 $75.00
Metal Framing - 6” x 16 gauge studs 12 $46.06 $552.72
Metal Framing - 6" x 16 gauge track 3 $31.92 $95.76
Tax
Freight
Mark Up 15% $126.52
Total Material $970.00
Engineering, Shop Drawings, Rental Equipment
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Mark Up 15% $0.00
Total Equipment $0.00
Labor
Description Man Hours Cost Per Man Hour Subtotal
Carpenter Add Backing For Casework 2 $105.99 $211.98
Laborer Demolition of existing ceiling and framing 8 $80.60 $644.80 Carpenter Frame New Ceiling 16 $105.99 $1695.84
Drywall Install Drywall & Finish (N) Ceiling & Walls 24 $106.92 $2566.08 Labor Burden -
Mark Up 15% $767.81
Total Labor $5,886.51
Subcontractors
Description Units Unit Price Subtotal
Fremont Millwork
Cost to add an additional cabinet in the
armory space and extend / enlarge the
stainless steel countertop 1 $3,365.00 $3,365.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Mark Up 5% $168.25
Total
Subcontracted
Cost $3,533.25
Sub-Total $10,389.76
Bond (3%) $311.69
Liability (.9%) $93.51
Extended Duration $0
Bond &
Insurance Cost $405.20
Total Cost $10,794.96
Time Extension Requested 5 Working Days
736

OTHER DIRECT COSTS
ITEM Quan Rate Total
Project Management $110.00 $0.00
Project Coordinator $60.00 $0.00
Superintendent 0 $120.00 $0.00
Accounts $40.00 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
TOTAL, OTHER DIRECT COSTS= $0
737

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 15, 2025 ITEM #11
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-4 APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR SUBDIVISION 5223, INDEPENDENCE IN WEST SACRAMENTO
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Candido Ramirez, Senior Civil Engineer
Community Development Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
This item seeks City Council adoption of Resolution 25-4 approving the Final Map for Subdivision 5223, Independence in West Sacramento.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that City Council adopt Resolution 25-4 (Attachment 1), approving the Final Map for Independence in West Sacramento, Subdivision 5223.

BACKGROUND
On October 19, 2023, the Planning Commission conditionally approved 3130/3350 Promenade Tentative Subdivision Map 5223. The tentative map merged two (2) lots into one 12.05-acre lot. The map allows construction of up to 104 duplex buildings for a total of 208 rental residences.

The property is owned by Independence in West Sacramento LP, and is bounded on the north by Southport Parkway, east by Promenade Street, south by Golden Gate Drive and west by an existing apartment complex.

ANALYSIS
The Final Map is included as Attachment 3. Tentative Map conditions of approval applicable to the map have been satisfied for this Final Map. The map does not dedicate right-of-way or easements.

Most of the infrastructure improvements will be built on a private single lot. Therefore, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement will not be necessary. Improvements within the existing public right-of-way will require an encroachment permit, which includes a mechanism to collect sureties.

Improvement plans are being reviewed and will be approved by Community Development Department engineering staff. Sureties will ensure the completion of the infrastructure improvements prior to issuance of building permits.

Environmental Considerations
The Planning Commission found the Tentative Map to be compliant with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) at the time of its approval. No additional findings are required with approval of this map.

Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission approved the project and tentative map on October 19, 2023.

Strategic Plan Integration
Approval of this Final Map will further development of Southport and promote a number of Council strategic planning goals, including creating Vibrant Neighborhoods, through Quality City Infrastructure where our residents Feel Safe and Secure, and Enjoy Comfortable Living.

Alternatives
In accordance with Section 66458 of the Government Code, if the map conforms to all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the local Subdivision Ordinance applicable at the time of the tentative map approval or conditional approval and any ruling made thereunder, the map shall be approved at the meeting at which the map is received, or at the next meeting.
739
Independence in West Sacramento – Subdivision Map 5223
January 15, 2025

Page 2 ends

The Developer for Final Map 5223 has satisfied all applicable tentative map conditions required prior to approval of the Map. Under State law, the City must approve the Final Map. Therefore, it is recommended that City Council adopt Resolution 25-4, approving Final Map 5223.

Coordination and Review
The Final Map for Independence in West Sacramento has been reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and the City Surveyor.

Budget/Cost Impact
Staff and City Surveyor costs associated with the processing of the Final Map are reimbursed by the developer.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution 25-4

2. Vicinity Map

3. Final Map
740
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION 25-4

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR SUBDIVISION 5223
(INDEPENDENCE IN WEST SACRAMENTO)
WHEREAS, said Final Map for Subdivision 5223 has been prepared and presented to the City Council of the City of West Sacramento for approval; and WHEREAS, said Final Map, located between Southport Parkway, Promenade Street and Golden Gate Drive creates one (1) lot; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved the Tentative Subdivision Map at a regular Planning Commission meeting on October 19, 2023; and WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of said Final Map, the completion of certain improvements are required; and
WHEREAS, the Developer will submit required securities prior to issuance of engineering permits; and
WHEREAS, said Final Map satisfies the conditions of approval and mitigation measures of said Tentative Map, and said Final Map conforms to the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the City Council of the City of West Sacramento hereby approves the Final Map for Subdivision 5223, Independence in West Sacramento.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of West Sacramento on this 15th day of January 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ATTEST:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
741
742
743
744
745
746

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 15, 2025 ITEM #12
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF FINDING OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY FOR A TYPE 48 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LIQUOR LICENSE AT 2220 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. #120 (ROCO WINE & SPIRITS)
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [ X ] Staff
[ ] Other
Dawna Jones, Senior Analyst
Police Department
ATTACHMENT [ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with information regarding the issuance of an Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 48 on-sale liquor license for consideration of a determination of a Public Convenience or Necessity to allow on-site service and consumption of distilled spirits at an existing taproom at 2220 Lake Washington Blvd. #120 (RoCo Wine & Spirits).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:

1. Find that Public Convenience or Necessity would be served by the issuance of an Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 48 License at 2220 Lake Washington Blvd. #120; and

2. Authorize the submission of a letter of determination of a Public Convenience or Necessity to the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

BACKGROUND
Effective January 1, 1995, Section 23958.4 was added to the State Business and Professions Code, which defines “undue concentration” and limits the number of liquor licenses allowed within a census tract based on the population. The California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) will not issue a new license to businesses located in an area with undue concentration, unless the governing body of City of West Sacramento (the City Council) determines that the issuance of the license would serve a Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN). (A summary of all active ABC Licenses in the city is provided in Attachment 3). Should a West Sacramento business apply for an ABC liquor license requiring a PCN, the City Council must find that the PCN is warranted and submit a letter to ABC in the form provided as Attachment 5.

ANALYSIS
RoCo Wine & Spirits (RoCo) located at 2220 Lake Washington Blvd. #120 has operated a liquor store and convenience market since 2010. The business also offers on-site service of craft beer in the taproom. RoCo currently has ABC liquor licenses authorizing the sale and consumption of beer and wine on the premises and authorizing the tasting of beer, wine and distilled spirits on the premises.

RoCo is applying for an ABC Type 48 liquor “On-Sale General” License, which allows the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption on the premises. It has been determined that a PCN is required for the application of this license due to the number of active on-sale ABC licenses in Census Tract 103.15 where the business is located.

Although RoCo lies within an area meeting the undue concentration criteria, Staff supports this addition of the requested Type 48 liquor license to Census Tract 103.15 based on the following findings:

1. It would enhance the economic viability of the area in which it is proposed to be located.

Approving the PCN is consistent with the following City General Plan goals and policies:
 The City shall promote and assist with the maintenance and expansion of West Sacramento’s retail sector, including both regional and neighborhood-serving retail options, to meet the needs of West Sacramento’s residents, employees and visitors, and shall promote opportunities to create new housing and transit service in the vicinity of retail opportunity areas.  The City shall encourage the development of neighborhood and community-serving commercial centers that complement and are well integrated into surrounding neighborhoods and provide gathering places for residents, employees and visitors. 747
RoCo ABC PCN
January 15, 2025

Page 2 of 2 ends

 The City shall encourage the development of new entertainment, leisure and restaurant venues that meet the needs of local residents and the region.

2. It is compatible with existing uses in the area.

The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of the West Sacramento Municipal Code. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

3. It would not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the Community.

The Police Department compiled statistics from the past three years and the data did not indicate a high rate of crime for the RoCo business location or the surrounding area. While the introduction of distilled spirits at a property where they have not been served previously could result in adverse effects, Staff recommends specific Conditions of Approval listed in Attachment 4, which have been designed to minimize the instances of nuisance and other problematic activities that may coincide with sales of distilled spirits for on-site consumption.

The RoCo business location has not generated a significant number of calls for police service previously and if operated in the accordance with the recommended conditions of approval, the addition of an ABC Type 48 License for the RoCo business would not result in a significant increase in calls for service.

Environmental Considerations
This action falls under the “common sense” exemption according to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The common-sense exemption applies to projects that do not involve any physical changes with potential to create an adverse effect on the environment.

Commission Recommendation
On September 19, 2024, at a regular meeting, the Planning Commission of the City of West Sacramento conducted a public hearing and approved a Conditional Use Permit for on-site service of wine and distilled spirits at RoCo.

Strategic Plan Integration
The determination of a PCN supports the City’s vision of a strong diverse local economy and advances the 20023 strategic Principal Local Economic Development by facilitating an expansion of an existing business’s service.

Alternatives

1. Determine that the Public Convenience or Necessity would not be served by issuance of the Type 48 License and deny the request.

2. Continue the item to a future date and request that additional information be provided at that time.

Coordination and Review
This Agenda Report was coordinate and reviewed by the Community Development Department and Police Department
Budget/Cost Impact
N/A

ATTACHMENTS

1. Application for Public Convenience or Necessity

2. Statement of Justification

3. Census Tract Map

4. Planning Commission Action Form

5. Determination of PCN letter to ABC

748
749
750
Subject: Justification for Converting Taproom into a Full-Service Bar Dear Members of the West Sacramento City Planning Commission, We at RoCo are writing to propose the conversion of our existing taproom into a full-service craft cocktail bar. The taproom, once a vibrant hub for the community, has faced significant challenges since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite our best efforts to revive its success, we have been unable to restore it to its former vitality. We firmly believe that transforming it into a full-service craft cocktail bar will not only revitalize our business but also contribute positively to the community.

Reasons for Conversion:

1. Economic Revitalization:
• Job Creation: The full-service bar will create new employment opportunities for bartenders, waitstaff, and support staff, contributing to the local economy. • Increased Revenue: The new business model will attract a broader customer base, boosting revenue and ensuring long-term sustainability.

2. Community Benefits:
• Enhanced Social Hub: A craft cocktail bar will serve as a sophisticated social gathering place, fostering community interaction and engagement.
• Cultural Enrichment: By offering a diverse range of craft cocktails, we will provide unique cultural experiences and promote local craftsmanship.

3. Complementary to Local Development:
• Alignment with Urban Development: Our proposal aligns with West Sacramento’s goals of urban revitalization and creating vibrant community spaces. • Supporting Local Producers: We plan to source ingredients locally, supporting nearby farms and suppliers, thus boosting the local economy.

4. Health and Safety Measures:
• Adherence to Regulations: We will strictly adhere to health and safety guidelines to ensure a safe environment for our patrons.
• Enhanced Sanitation Protocols: Enhanced cleaning and sanitation protocols will be implemented to maintain a high standard of hygiene.

Additional Advantages:
• Diverse Offerings: In addition to craft cocktails, the bar will offer a variety of non-alcoholic beverages and small plate food options to cater to all preferences. • Community Events: We plan to host regular community events, such as live music, art showcases, and cocktail-making classes, to engage and entertain residents. • Sustainable Practices: Commitment to eco-friendly practices, such as using biodegradable straws and reducing single-use plastics, will be a core aspect of our operations.

In conclusion, converting our taproom into a full-service craft cocktail bar represents an exciting opportunity for both RoCo and the West Sacramento community. We are confident that this transformation will not only bring new life to our business but also serve as a valuable addition to the local area. We respectfully seek your approval and support for this initiative.

Thank you for your consideration.
751
Attachment 6 – ABC Licenses in Census Tract
Census Tract 103.15
On-Sale
Name Address License Type
Pheasant Club 2525 Jefferson Blvd 47 (Beer, Wine, Liquor) Nugget Market 2000 Town Center Plaza 86,41 (Tastings + Beer, Wine)
Tsuki Sushi 2210 Lake Washington Blvd 41 (Beer, Wine)
Streets of London 2220 Lake Washington Blvd 47 (Beer, Wine, Liquor) ROCO Wine & Spirits 2220 Lake Washington Blvd 86,42 (Tastings + Beer, Wine)
Marco’s Pizza 2230 Lake Washington Blvd 41 (Beer, Wine) Round Table Pizza 2105 Town Center Plaza 41 (Beer, Wine) Off-Sale
Nugget Market 2000 Town Center Plaza 21 (Beer, Wine, Liquor) AM/PM 2264 Lake Washington Blvd 20 (Beer, Wine)
ROCO Wine & Spirits 2220 Lake Washington Blvd 21 (Beer, Wine, Liquor) Target 2005 Town Center Plaza 21 (Beer, Wine, Liquor)
752
1110 West Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
(916) 617-4500
www.cityofwestsacramento.org

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
Community Development Department
Planning Division

PLANNING COMMISSION

ACTION FORM
On September 19, 2024, at a regular meeting, the Planning Commission of the City of West Sacramento approved the following project:

Request: Conditional Use Permit for on-site service of wine & distilled spirits and associated Type 48 ABC License at an existing taproom.

Property Location: 2220 Lake Washington Boulevard #120.

APN(s): 045-030-022-000
Applicant’s Name: Rohit Nayyar
Address:

Property Owner’s Name:
2220 Lake Washington Boulevard #120
West Sacramento, CA 95691
RB Sinclair, LLC
Address: 74 Shasta Street
Hayward CA, 94541

The conditions and mitigation measures of this project, as approved by the Planning Commission, are attached. The action of the Planning Commission regarding approval, denial, or conditions, may be appealed to the City Council. To be considered, an appeal must be filed with the office of the City Clerk (1110 West Capitol Avenue, 3rd Floor) within 15 calendar days of the date of this action. This approval is not final until the appeal period has expired without the filing of an appeal. ____________________________________
Seamus Laffey, Seniorl Planner
Secretary to the Planning Commission

Docusign Envelope ID: 904B743E-43D5-4F1B-AA36-02EE4F589839 753
1110 West Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
(916) 617-4500
www.cityofwestsacramento.org

Page 2 ends

ROCO Wine & Spirits CUP
September 20, 2024

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Division

1. The specific project approved by this action is identified as the RoCo Conditional Use Permit for conversion of an existing beer taproom into a full-service bar to include on-site service of wine & distilled spirits.

2. The applicant shall obtain a Type 48 License from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and the license shall be kept active and in good standing at all times.

3. Upon issuance of the Type 48 License, the applicant shall forfeit their existing Type 42 License.

4. The applicant shall provide the City with written notice of intent to sell or transfer the ABC License within 30 days of filing with the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

5. Hours of operation shall be limited to the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. daily. Last call for alcohol shall be made by 11:15 p.m. and all alcohol sales must cease by 11:30 p.m. All alcohol shall be removed from the tables & patrons at 12:00 a.m.

6. After hours use of the premises, other than for routine clean-up and maintenance, is not permitted.

7. The business premises and adjacent parking lot areas in the immediate vicinity of the establishment shall be cleared of any lingering patrons immediately after closing.

8. The windows of the premises shall not be tinted or covered in any way that obstructs a clear view of the interior of the premises from the exterior. The existing advertising signage exceeding 25 percent of the window area shall be removed prior to expiration of the appeal period of this Conditional Use Permit.

9. Project shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures in the General Plan 2035.

10. The number of occupants shall not exceed the maximum permitted occupant load per California Building Code or Fire Code.

Police Department

11. No alcoholic beverages shall be consumed outside of the taproom or approved patio area.

12. Owner shall be responsible for and cause the removal of any and all graffiti that appears upon the property within 72 hours of discovery.

13. The business is responsible for ensuring the property is maintained free of litter.

Docusign Envelope ID: 904B743E-43D5-4F1B-AA36-02EE4F589839 754
1110 West Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
(916) 617-4500
www.cityofwestsacramento.org

Page 3 ends

ROCO Wine & Spirits CUP
September 20, 2024

14. All employees who sell alcoholic beverage products shall be required to complete the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control’s Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) training.

15. No employee shall serve alcoholic beverages to persons that are obviously under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

16. The property shall have the following security measures:
a. Provide operable closed circuit security cameras that survey both the interior and exterior of the property. Cameras will be placed to record the patrons in the bar and patio areas. A minimum of one camera will record the parking lot. A minimum of one camera will record each entry & exit. Each camera shall record at least 720p recording resolution levels and at least 15 frames per second. Recorded video will be made available to the West Sacramento Police Department upon request.

17. The Police Department shall have the right to add or modify conditions should problems develop which are not readily apparent at this time or if the applicant fails to adequately manage public safety or security issues.

Standard Conditions & Mitigation Measures

18. Applicant shall hold harmless the City, its council members, officers, agents, employees, and representatives from liability for any award, damages, costs, and fees incurred by the City and/or awarded to any plaintiff in any action challenging the validity of this permit or any environmental or other documentation related to approval of this permit. Subdivider further agrees to provide a defense for the City in such action. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any such action and shall cooperate fully in the defense.

19. Prior to issuance of this Conditional Use Permit, all monies owed on the project’s work order account shall be paid in full.

20. This approval will expire in 24 months if the project has not begun operations. The Zoning Administrator may approve extensions of time for Use Permits, providing that the applicant requests the extension in writing prior to the expiration date. Such extensions shall be approved only when it is found that the circumstances under which the permits were granted have not substantially changed, and such extensions shall be approved for no more than 24 months (Municipal Code §17.38.080).

21. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the previously approved building permit and site plan.

Docusign Envelope ID: 904B743E-43D5-4F1B-AA36-02EE4F589839 755
1110 West Capitol Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
(916) 617-4500
www.cityofwestsacramento.org
January 15, 2025
Maggie DeSouza
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
2400 Del Paso Road #115
Sacramento, CA 95834
RE: Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity, RoCo Wine & Spirits, 2220 Lake Washington Boulevard #120
Dear Maggie:

On January 15, 2025, the West Sacramento City Council, pursuant to Section 23958.4 of the Business and Professions Code, determined that public convenience or necessity will be served by issuance of a Type 48 On-Sale General License for RoCo Wine & Spirits to Rohit Nayyar (owner) located at 2220 Lake Washington Boulevard #120. The factors supporting this determination include:
 Although the proposed Type 48 License is within a census tract with an undue concentration of active ABC Licenses, the applicant’s proposal was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing and approved with Conditions of Approval intended to minimize potential negative impacts to the surrounding businesses and community; and  The West Sacramento Police Department has reviewed the applicant’s proposal and did not express concerns related to public safety in consideration of the proposed Conditions of Approval; and
 Although the proposed Type 48 License is within a census tract with an undue concentration of ABC Licenses, there are no other Type 48 Licenses within Census Tract 103.15.

Sincerely,
Martha Guerrero
Mayor
756
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT.

MEETING DATE: January 15, 2025 ITEM #13
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF UPDATES TO PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULE AND AUTHORIZED POSITION LIST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25, AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 25-13 AMENDING THE O&M BUDGET FOR FY 2024/25 INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X ] Staff
[ ] Other
Kaitlyn Montez, Human Resources Supervisor
City Manager’s Office
ATTACHMENT [ X ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [ X ] Action

OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this report is to seek City Council approval for updates to the publicly available pay schedule for FY 2024/25, revised Authorized Position List for FY 2024/25, and consideration of Resolution 25-13 amending the O&M budget for FY 2024/25 to fund the proposed changes.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve the amended and updated publicly available pay schedule (Classification Plan) for Fiscal Year 2024/25;

2. Approve the amended and updated Authorized Position List (APL) for Fiscal Year 2024/25; and

3. Approve Resolution 25-13 amending the O&M Budget for FY 2024/25 to fund the proposed changes.

BACKGROUND
The Authorized Position List (APL) identifies the number of positions and their respective classification titles by budget unit. Staff must bring an updated Authorized Position List to the City Council for approval whenever there are changes to the number(s) of positions or budget unit(s).

The Publicly Available Pay schedule (Classification Plan) establishes the monthly and annual salary ranges for all regular authorized positions as well as the pay schedule for the Mayor, City Council members, and all extra help positions in the City. CalPERS requires the City bring updated salary ranges (Classification Plan) to the City Council whenever there are changes to the salary ranges or job titles.

ANALYSIS
The City has experienced significant growth in its workforce over recent years, yet our support divisions - Human Resources, Information Technology, and Finance - have not scaled proportionally to meet increasing demands.

These essential divisions have been historically understaffed, creating operational inefficiencies and delays in critical support services. The current staffing levels have resulted in extended processing times for recruitment, delayed responses to technical issues, and stretched capacity for financial oversight and reporting.

With the recent passage of Measure O and its associated programmatic requirements, staff anticipates a further expansion of city services and approval of additional positions across departments. The implementation of Measure O initiatives will require significant support in terms of personnel management, technological infrastructure, and fiscal administration, with the potential to compromise service quality without adequate staffing adjustments for these City support divisions.

The HR division requires additional capacity to manage increased recruitment volumes, maintain compliance with evolving employment regulations, and support employee development programs. The IT department needs enhanced staffing to ensure robust cybersecurity measures, maintain expanding systems infrastructure, and provide timely technical support to a growing workforce. Similarly, the Finance division requires additional personnel to manage increased transaction volumes, maintain internal controls, and ensure proper fiscal oversight of new programs and personnel. The staffing needs within the HR division include an additional HR & Payroll Technician I/II and a Human Resources Analyst to provide higher-level support to the division. Within the IT Division, two IT Specialist I/II positions are proposed to be added to provide additional general support as well as support the Data Services Manager and GIS-related functions in the Community Development Department.

A new GIS Supervisor position is also proposed to be added to oversee the IT Specialists in the GIS-related functions within the IT division, as well as in Capital Projects and CDD. 757
Updates To Publicly Available Pay Schedule and Authorized Position List For Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

January 15, 2025

Page 2 ends

In the Finance Department, a new Accountant I/II position is proposed to provide additional support in a number of areas where workload and compliance requirements have increased, including the expansion in the City's grant portfolio following the Covid pandemic, FEMA disaster claims reporting, Governmental Accounting Standards Board pronouncement implementations, and expected increases in activity in all of these areas with the addition of a new tax measure. Additional support is also needed in the Budget and Financial Planning division, which is responsible for development and management of the City's O&M and 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budgets, the City's fee program, including the Book of Fees and the Impact Fee program, long-term forecasting, public finance, and other fiscal analyses. New requirements are anticipated to tax this division’s single Senior Finance Analyst, including new legal requirements for updating impact fees by 2030, implementation of a budget book/transparency system, formation of new CFDs and fiscal analysis needs, so an additional Finance Analyst/Senior is proposed to be added. A Finance Analyst/Senior is requested to be added in the Procurement & Contracts Division to support what promises to be a significant increase in procurement and contracting workload with the implementation of Measure O, issuance of EIFD and IFD Bonds, and other strategic financing options to allow the City to move forward with a backlog of capital improvement projects.

Without these crucial support positions, we risk operational bottlenecks that could impede the successful implementation of Measure O initiatives and compromise staff’s ability to deliver efficient services to our community. These requested positions represent a strategic investment in our organizational infrastructure that will enable us to effectively scale our operations and maintain high service standards as our city continues to grow.

In addition, the recent retirement of the Deputy City Manager/Chief Innovation Officer has prompted a strategic reorganization of the City Manager's Office. As part of this restructuring, the Information Technology division will be realigned under the Assistant City Manager's oversight. This organizational change necessitates the reinstatement of the IT Manager position to provide direct leadership and management of the division's operations, ensuring continued excellence in technology services delivery. Recent provisional appointments to positions in the CMO, including Deputy City Manager and Program Manager, also require adjustments to funding allocations. The reallocation of funding for these positions will better reflect their roles and responsibilities within the reorganized structure.

Publicly Available Pay Schedule (Classification Plan): The City of West Sacramento’s (City) publicly available pay schedule identifies job classifications that have been approved by the City Council and the rates of pay for each classification at each step. The requested change to the publicly available pay schedule is a result of the following:
 Addition of the Human Resources Analyst I - $6,643 - $8,093;  Addition of the Human Resources Analyst II - $7,816 - $9,522;  Addition of GIS Supervisor - $8,714 - $10,590;
 Addition of Information Technology Manager - $10,680 - $12,979;  Update of the City Council and Mayor monthly salary range from $300 to $1,600. This adjustment was approved in June 2024 and effective the first pay period after certification of election results. As the certification of election results was not a date certain at the time the adjustment was approved, this update to the classification plan merely documents the official effective date of the adjustment as December 14, 2024, which is the first pay period after the election results were certified on December 3, 2024; and  Title change of Deputy City Manager/Director of Innovation & Technology to Deputy City Manager.

Authorized Position List: The Authorized Position List FY 2024/25 reflects the following proposed amendments:
1/15/
2025
City
Manager's
Office
City
Counci
l
Add 1.0 FTE GIS Supervisor to 104-9034. Add 1.0 FTE Information Technology Specialist I/II to 104-9034. Add 1.0 FTE IT Manager to 104-9034. Add 1.0 FTE Technical Support Specialist I/II/III to 110-9018. Add 1.0 FTE Information Technology Specialist I/II to 650-9035. Add 1.0 FTE HR & Payroll Technician I/II to 104-9024. Add

1.0 FTE Human Resources Analyst I/II to 104-9024. Change title of Deputy City Manager/Director of Innovation & Technology to Deputy City Manager. Change Deputy City Manager from 0.33 104-9034/0.34 104-9016/ 0.33 110-9018 to 0.33 104-9026/ 0.34 104-9021/ 0.33 110-9018. Change Assistant City Manager from 0.82 104-9016/ 0.08 106-9020/ 0.1 516-9700 to 0.08 106-9020/ 0.1 516-9700/ 0.2 104- 9034/ 0.62 104-9016. Change 1.0 FTE Program Manager/Senior from 104-9021 to 104-9016.
758
Updates To Publicly Available Pay Schedule and Authorized Position List For Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

January 15, 2025

Page 3 ends

1/15/
2025 Finance
City
Counci
l
Add 1.0 FTE Accountant I/II to 104-9051. Add 1.0 FTE Finance Analyst/Senior to 104- 9054. Add 1.0 FTE Finance Analyst/Senior to 104-9053.

Environmental Considerations
Not applicable
Commission Recommendation
Not applicable
Strategic Plan Integration
These recommendations support the City Council’s Mission to provide Quality Municipal Services and a City government that is financially sound with a superior workforce.

Alternatives
The City Council may choose not to approve the Planning Manager job description, publicly available pay schedule (classification plan) and the Authorized Position List for Fiscal Year 2024/25.

Coordination and Review
This report has been coordinated between the City Manager's Office, Human Resources Division, and the Finance Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
Overall, this item proposes the addition of ten (10) new positions and reallocation of costs for the Deputy City Manager, Program Manager/Senior, and Assistant City Manager positions to better reflect revised duties with the recent retirement of the DCM. The attached resolution includes prorated budgets for ¼ of the fiscal year (April – June) and include a total impact of $456,547 across various funds, including $30,654 in the Community Development Fund, $34,052 in the Measure E fund, and $391,840 in the General Support Services fund which is allocated out to all funds based on level of service provided. Ongoing annual impact for these proposed changes is $1.8 million ($122,616 to the Community Development Fund, $136,209 to the Measure E fund, and $1.6 million to the General Support Fund).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Amended and updated publicly available pay schedule (Classification Plan) for Fiscal Year 2024/25

2. Amended and updated Authorized Position List (APL) for Fiscal Year 2024/25

3. Resolution 25-13
759
Title Page City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025
City of West Sacramento
Salary Schedule
Fiscal Year 2024 / 2025

Page 1 of 17 ends

760
Battalion Chief's Association City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE

BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Fire Battalion Chief BCA 7/1/24 $42.4739 $53.1676 $10,307 $12,902 $123,684 $154,824 *Based on 2912 annual hours

Page 2 of 17 ends

761
City Manager City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION
TITLE

BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I City Manager 8/26/2023 $136.9500 $23,738 $284,856

Page 3 of 17 ends

762
Confidential City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Administrative Assistant CONFID 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Administrative Clerk I CONFID 7/1/24 $22.9904 $28.0154 $3,985 $4,856 $47,820 $58,272 $3,985 $4,085 $4,187 $4,292 $4,399 $4,509 $4,622 $4,738 $4,856 Administrative Clerk II CONFID 7/1/24 $25.3038 $30.8250 $4,386 $5,343 $52,632 $64,116 $4,386 $4,496 $4,608 $4,723 $4,841 $4,962 $5,086 $5,213 $5,343 Administrative Clerk III CONFID 7/1/24 $26.7577 $32.6019 $4,638 $5,651 $55,656 $67,812 $4,638 $4,754 $4,873 $4,995 $5,120 $5,248 $5,379 $5,513 $5,651 Executive Assistant to the City Manager CONFID 7/1/24 $32.8327 $39.9981 $5,691 $6,933 $68,292 $83,196 $5,691 $5,833 $5,979 $6,128 $6,281 $6,438 $6,599 $6,764 $6,933 Human Resources Analyst I CONFID 1/15/25 $38.3250 $46.6904 $6,643 $8,093 $79,716 $97,116 $6,643 $6,809 $6,979 $7,153 $7,332 $7,515 $7,703 $7,896 $8,093 Human Resources Analyst II CONFID 1/15/25 $45.0923 $54.9346 $7,816 $9,522 $93,792 $114,264 $7,816 $8,011 $8,211 $8,416 $8,626 $8,842 $9,063 $9,290 $9,522 Human Resources & Payroll Technician I CONFID 7/1/24 $26.7577 $32.6019 $4,638 $5,651 $55,656 $67,812 $4,638 $4,754 $4,873 $4,995 $5,120 $5,248 $5,379 $5,513 $5,651 Human Resources & Payroll Technician II CONFID 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Payroll Administrator CONFID 7/1/24 $34.8231 $42.4385 $6,036 $7,356 $72,432 $88,272 $6,036 $6,187 $6,342 $6,501 $6,664 $6,831 $7,002 $7,177 $7,356

Page 4 of 17 ends

763
Elected Officials City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY
MINIMU
M
HOURLY
MAXIMU
M

MONTHLY
MINIMU
M

MONTHLY
MAXIMU
M
ANNUAL
MINIMU
M
ANNUAL
MAXIMU
M

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I City Council Member ELECTED OFFICIAL 12/14/24 $1,600 $19,200 Mayor ELECTED OFFICIAL 12/14/24 $1,600 $19,200

Page 5 of 17 ends

764
Executive Management City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Assistant City Manager EXECMGM 7/1/24 $93.5019 $113.6331 $16,207 $19,696 $194,484 $236,357 Deputy City Manager EXECMGM 1/15/25 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Director of Capital Projects EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Director of Community Development EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Director of Economic Development & Housing EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Director of Finance EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Director of Parks & Recreation EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Director of Public Works Operations & Maintenance EXECMGM 7/1/24 $80.1462 $97.3998 $13,892 $16,883 $166,704 $202,592 Fire Chief EXECMGM 7/1/24 $89.0481 $108.2220 $15,435 $18,758 $185,220 $225,102 Police Chief EXECMGM 7/1/24 $89.0481 $108.2220 $15,435 $18,758 $185,220 $225,102 Port General Manager EXECMGM 7/1/24 $71.2385 $86.5776 $12,348 $15,007 $148,176 $180,081

Page 6 of 17 ends

765
Firefighter's Association City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Fire Captain FFA 6/1/24 $39.5192 $48.0412 $9,590 $11,658 $115,080 $139,896 $9,590 $10,070 $10,574 $11,103 $11,658 Fire Engineer FFA 6/1/24 $34.4217 $41.8434 $8,353 $10,154 $100,236 $121,848 $8,353 $8,771 $9,210 $9,670 $10,154 Firefighter FFA 6/1/24 $31.5495 $38.3489 $7,656 $9,306 $91,872 $111,672 $7,656 $8,039 $8,441 $8,863 $9,306 *Based on 2912 annual hours

Page 7 of 17 ends

766
Local 39 City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Accounting Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $25.3154 $30.8365 $4,388 $5,345 $52,656 $64,140 $4,388 $4,498 $4,610 $4,725 $4,843 $4,964 $5,088 $5,215 $5,345 Accounting Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.4596 $34.6788 $4,933 $6,011 $59,196 $72,132 $4,933 $5,056 $5,182 $5,312 $5,445 $5,581 $5,721 $5,864 $6,011 Accounting Technician III LOCAL39 7/1/24 $30.5885 $37.2750 $5,302 $6,461 $63,624 $77,532 $5,302 $5,435 $5,571 $5,710 $5,853 $5,999 $6,149 $6,303 $6,461 Chief Facilities Maintenance Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.6846 $45.9115 $6,532 $7,958 $78,384 $95,496 $6,532 $6,695 $6,862 $7,034 $7,210 $7,390 $7,575 $7,764 $7,958 Chief Maintenance Worker (Possess a D3
and/or hired after 7/1/19) LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.7750 $39.9404 $5,681 $6,923 $68,172 $83,076 $5,681 $5,823 $5,969 $6,118 $6,271 $6,428 $6,589 $6,754 $6,923 Chief Parks & Grounds Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $30.5885 $37.2750 $5,302 $6,461 $63,624 $77,532 $5,302 $5,435 $5,571 $5,710 $5,853 $5,999 $6,149 $6,303 $6,461 Chief Treatment Plant Mechanic LOCAL39 7/1/24 $41.6942 $50.8038 $7,227 $8,806 $86,724 $105,672 $7,227 $7,408 $7,593 $7,783 $7,978 $8,177 $8,381 $8,591 $8,806 Clerk LOCAL39 7/1/24 $20.9769 $25.5519 $3,636 $4,429 $43,632 $53,148 $3,636 $3,727 $3,820 $3,915 $4,013 $4,113 $4,216 $4,321 $4,429 Clerk, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $22.8000 $27.7788 $3,952 $4,815 $47,424 $57,780 $3,952 $4,051 $4,152 $4,256 $4,362 $4,471 $4,583 $4,698 $4,815 Electrical Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $39.1038 $47.6423 $6,778 $8,258 $81,336 $99,096 $6,778 $6,947 $7,121 $7,299 $7,481 $7,668 $7,860 $8,057 $8,258 Engineering Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.7250 $34.9962 $4,979 $6,066 $59,748 $72,792 $4,979 $5,103 $5,231 $5,362 $5,496 $5,633 $5,774 $5,918 $6,066 Engineering Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.2212 $39.2596 $5,585 $6,805 $67,020 $81,660 $5,585 $5,725 $5,868 $6,015 $6,165 $6,319 $6,477 $6,639 $6,805 Engineering Technician III LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.2346 $45.3635 $6,454 $7,863 $77,448 $94,356 $6,454 $6,615 $6,780 $6,949 $7,123 $7,301 $7,484 $7,671 $7,863 Engineering/GIS Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $39.0981 $47.6308 $6,777 $8,256 $81,324 $99,072 $6,777 $6,946 $7,120 $7,298 $7,480 $7,667 $7,859 $8,055 $8,256 Equipment Mechanic I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $26.3712 $32.1288 $4,571 $5,569 $54,852 $66,828 $4,571 $4,685 $4,802 $4,922 $5,045 $5,171 $5,300 $5,433 $5,569 Equipment Mechanic II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.3558 $34.5519 $4,915 $5,989 $58,980 $71,868 $4,915 $5,038 $5,164 $5,293 $5,425 $5,561 $5,700 $5,843 $5,989 Facilities Maintenance Aide LOCAL39 7/1/24 $19.2231 $23.4173 $3,332 $4,059 $39,984 $48,708 $3,332 $3,415 $3,500 $3,587 $3,677 $3,769 $3,863 $3,960 $4,059 Facilities Maintenance Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $29.6538 $36.1269 $5,140 $6,262 $61,680 $75,144 $5,140 $5,268 $5,400 $5,535 $5,673 $5,815 $5,960 $6,109 $6,262 Facilities Maintenance Worker, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.6365 $39.7615 $5,657 $6,892 $67,884 $82,704 $5,657 $5,798 $5,943 $6,092 $6,244 $6,400 $6,560 $6,724 $6,892 Groundskeeper LOCAL39 7/1/24 $20.2385 $24.6577 $3,508 $4,274 $42,096 $51,288 $3,508 $3,596 $3,686 $3,778 $3,872 $3,969 $4,068 $4,170 $4,274 Instrumentation Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $43.3558 $52.8231 $7,515 $9,156 $90,180 $109,872 $7,515 $7,703 $7,896 $8,093 $8,295 $8,502 $8,715 $8,933 $9,156 Maintenance Worker (2) LOCAL39 7/1/24 $26.0538 $31.7538 $4,516 $5,504 $54,192 $66,048 $4,516 $4,629 $4,745 $4,864 $4,986 $5,111 $5,239 $5,370 $5,504 Maintenance Worker, Senior (2) LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.8000 $35.0885 $4,992 $6,082 $59,904 $72,984 $4,992 $5,117 $5,245 $5,376 $5,510 $5,648 $5,789 $5,934 $6,082 Parks & Grounds Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $24.8077 $30.2308 $4,300 $5,240 $51,600 $62,880 $4,300 $4,407 $4,517 $4,630 $4,746 $4,865 $4,987 $5,112 $5,240 Parks & Grounds Worker, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $27.1269 $33.0519 $4,702 $5,729 $56,424 $68,748 $4,702 $4,820 $4,940 $5,063 $5,190 $5,320 $5,453 $5,589 $5,729 Permit Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.4538 $34.6673 $4,932 $6,009 $59,184 $72,108 $4,932 $5,055 $5,181 $5,311 $5,444 $5,580 $5,719 $5,862 $6,009 Permit Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $30.5885 $37.2750 $5,302 $6,461 $63,624 $77,532 $5,302 $5,435 $5,571 $5,710 $5,853 $5,999 $6,149 $6,303 $6,461 Planning Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.4654 $34.6846 $4,934 $6,012 $59,208 $72,144 $4,934 $5,057 $5,183 $5,313 $5,446 $5,582 $5,722 $5,865 $6,012 Recreation Coordinator LOCAL39 7/1/24 $25.3269 $30.8481 $4,390 $5,347 $52,680 $64,164 $4,390 $4,500 $4,612 $4,727 $4,845 $4,966 $5,090 $5,217 $5,347 Recreation Supervisor I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $31.6327 $38.5385 $5,483 $6,680 $65,796 $80,160 $5,483 $5,620 $5,760 $5,904 $6,052 $6,203 $6,358 $6,517 $6,680 Recreation Supervisor II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.1635 $42.8365 $6,095 $7,425 $73,140 $89,100 $6,095 $6,247 $6,403 $6,563 $6,727 $6,895 $7,067 $7,244 $7,425 Revenue Supervisor LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.1635 $42.8365 $6,095 $7,425 $73,140 $89,100 $6,095 $6,247 $6,403 $6,563 $6,727 $6,895 $7,067 $7,244 $7,425 Secretary LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.3212 $34.5058 $4,909 $5,981 $58,908 $71,772 $4,909 $5,032 $5,158 $5,287 $5,419 $5,554 $5,693 $5,835 $5,981 Senior Water Treatment Plant Operator LOCAL39 7/1/24 $44.6712 $54.4212 $7,743 $9,433 $92,916 $113,196 $7,743 $7,937 $8,135 $8,338 $8,546 $8,760 $8,979 $9,203 $9,433 Special Events Supervisor I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $31.6327 $38.5385 $5,483 $6,680 $65,796 $80,160 $5,483 $5,620 $5,760 $5,904 $6,052 $6,203 $6,358 $6,517 $6,680 Special Events Supervisor II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.1635 $42.8365 $6,095 $7,425 $73,140 $89,100 $6,095 $6,247 $6,403 $6,563 $6,727 $6,895 $7,067 $7,244 $7,425 Stationary Engineer LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.8962 $43.7308 $6,222 $7,580 $74,664 $90,960 $6,222 $6,378 $6,537 $6,700 $6,867 $7,039 $7,215 $7,395 $7,580 Traffic Control & Lighting Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $31.8173 $38.7635 $5,515 $6,719 $66,180 $80,628 $5,515 $5,653 $5,794 $5,939 $6,087 $6,239 $6,395 $6,555 $6,719 Traffic Control & Lighting Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.2346 $45.3635 $6,454 $7,863 $77,448 $94,356 $6,454 $6,615 $6,780 $6,949 $7,123 $7,301 $7,484 $7,671 $7,863 Treatment Plant Mechanic I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $33.8538 $41.2442 $5,868 $7,149 $70,416 $85,788 $5,868 $6,015 $6,165 $6,319 $6,477 $6,639 $6,805 $6,975 $7,149 Treatment Plant Mechanic II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.2346 $45.3635 $6,454 $7,863 $77,448 $94,356 $6,454 $6,615 $6,780 $6,949 $7,123 $7,301 $7,484 $7,671 $7,863 Water Meter Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $26.3712 $32.1288 $4,571 $5,569 $54,852 $66,828 $4,571 $4,685 $4,802 $4,922 $5,045 $5,171 $5,300 $5,433 $5,569 Water Treatment Plant Apprentice LOCAL39 7/1/24 $29.1577 $35.5154 $5,054 $6,156 $60,648 $73,872 $5,054 $5,180 $5,309 $5,442 $5,578 $5,717 $5,860 $6,006 $6,156 Water Treatment Plant Operator II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.9596 $40.1654 $5,713 $6,962 $68,556 $83,544 $5,713 $5,856 $6,002 $6,152 $6,306 $6,464 $6,626 $6,792 $6,962 Water Treatment Plant Operator III LOCAL39 7/1/24 $36.4212 $44.3827 $6,313 $7,693 $75,756 $92,316 $6,313 $6,471 $6,633 $6,799 $6,969 $7,143 $7,322 $7,505 $7,693

SALARY SCHEDULE B

SALARY SCHEDULE A

Page 8 of 17 ends

767
Local 39 City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Accounting Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $25.3673 $30.8365 $4,397 $5,345 $52,764 $64,140 $4,397 $4,617 $4,848 $5,090 $5,345 Accounting Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.5288 $34.6788 $4,945 $6,011 $59,340 $72,132 $4,945 $5,192 $5,452 $5,725 $6,011 Accounting Technician III LOCAL39 7/1/24 $30.6635 $37.2750 $5,315 $6,461 $63,780 $77,532 $5,315 $5,581 $5,860 $6,153 $6,461 Chief Facilities Maintenance Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.7712 $45.9115 $6,547 $7,958 $78,564 $95,496 $6,547 $6,874 $7,218 $7,579 $7,958 Chief Maintenance Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.3827 $39.3635 $5,613 $6,823 $67,356 $81,876 $5,613 $5,894 $6,189 $6,498 $6,823 Chief Maintenance Worker (Possess a D3
and/or hired after 7/1/19) LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.8558 $39.9404 $5,695 $6,923 $68,340 $83,076 $5,695 $5,980 $6,279 $6,593 $6,923 Chief Parks & Grounds Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $30.6635 $37.2750 $5,315 $6,461 $63,780 $77,532 $5,315 $5,581 $5,860 $6,153 $6,461 Chief Treatment Plant Mechanic LOCAL39 7/1/24 $41.8038 $50.8038 $7,246 $8,806 $86,952 $105,672 $7,246 $7,608 $7,988 $8,387 $8,806 Clerk LOCAL39 7/1/24 $21.0231 $25.5519 $3,644 $4,429 $43,728 $53,148 $3,644 $3,826 $4,017 $4,218 $4,429 Clerk, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $22.8577 $27.7788 $3,962 $4,815 $47,544 $57,780 $3,962 $4,160 $4,368 $4,586 $4,815 Electrical Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $39.1904 $47.6423 $6,793 $8,258 $81,516 $99,096 $6,793 $7,133 $7,490 $7,865 $8,258 Engineering Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.7885 $34.9962 $4,990 $6,066 $59,880 $72,792 $4,990 $5,240 $5,502 $5,777 $6,066 Engineering Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.2962 $39.2596 $5,598 $6,805 $67,176 $81,660 $5,598 $5,878 $6,172 $6,481 $6,805 Engineering Technician III LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.3212 $45.3635 $6,469 $7,863 $77,628 $94,356 $6,469 $6,792 $7,132 $7,489 $7,863 Engineering/GIS Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $39.1846 $47.6308 $6,792 $8,256 $81,504 $99,072 $6,792 $7,132 $7,489 $7,863 $8,256 Equipment Mechanic I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $26.4288 $32.1288 $4,581 $5,569 $54,972 $66,828 $4,581 $4,810 $5,051 $5,304 $5,569 Equipment Mechanic II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.4250 $34.5519 $4,927 $5,989 $59,124 $71,868 $4,927 $5,173 $5,432 $5,704 $5,989 Facilities Maintenance Aide LOCAL39 7/1/24 $19.2692 $23.4173 $3,340 $4,059 $40,080 $48,708 $3,340 $3,507 $3,682 $3,866 $4,059 Facilities Maintenance Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $29.7231 $36.1269 $5,152 $6,262 $61,824 $75,144 $5,152 $5,410 $5,680 $5,964 $6,262 Facilities Maintenance Worker, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $32.7115 $39.7615 $5,670 $6,892 $68,040 $82,704 $5,670 $5,953 $6,251 $6,564 $6,892 Groundskeeper LOCAL39 7/1/24 $20.2788 $24.6577 $3,515 $4,274 $42,180 $51,288 $3,515 $3,691 $3,876 $4,070 $4,274 Instrumentation Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $43.4596 $52.8231 $7,533 $9,156 $90,396 $109,872 $7,533 $7,910 $8,305 $8,720 $9,156 Maintenance Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $26.1231 $31.7538 $4,528 $5,504 $54,336 $66,048 $4,528 $4,754 $4,992 $5,242 $5,504 Maintenance Worker, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.8635 $35.0885 $5,003 $6,082 $60,036 $72,984 $5,003 $5,253 $5,516 $5,792 $6,082 Parks & Grounds Worker LOCAL39 7/1/24 $24.8654 $30.2308 $4,310 $5,240 $51,720 $62,880 $4,310 $4,526 $4,752 $4,990 $5,240 Parks & Grounds Worker, Senior LOCAL39 7/1/24 $27.1904 $33.0519 $4,713 $5,729 $56,556 $68,748 $4,713 $4,949 $5,196 $5,456 $5,729 Permit Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.5173 $34.6673 $4,943 $6,009 $59,316 $72,108 $4,943 $5,190 $5,450 $5,723 $6,009 Permit Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $30.6635 $37.2750 $5,315 $6,461 $63,780 $77,532 $5,315 $5,581 $5,860 $6,153 $6,461 Planning Technician LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.5346 $34.6846 $4,946 $6,012 $59,352 $72,144 $4,946 $5,193 $5,453 $5,726 $6,012 Recreation Coordinator LOCAL39 7/1/24 $25.3788 $30.8481 $4,399 $5,347 $52,788 $64,164 $4,399 $4,619 $4,850 $5,092 $5,347 Recreation Supervisor I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $31.7019 $38.5385 $5,495 $6,680 $65,940 $80,160 $5,495 $5,770 $6,059 $6,362 $6,680 Recreation Supervisor II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.2385 $42.8365 $6,108 $7,425 $73,296 $89,100 $6,108 $6,413 $6,734 $7,071 $7,425 Revenue Supervisor LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.2385 $42.8365 $6,108 $7,425 $73,296 $89,100 $6,108 $6,413 $6,734 $7,071 $7,425 Secretary LOCAL39 7/1/24 $28.3904 $34.5058 $4,921 $5,981 $59,052 $71,772 $4,921 $5,167 $5,425 $5,696 $5,981 Senior Water Treatment Plant Operator LOCAL39 7/1/24 $44.7750 $54.4212 $7,761 $9,433 $93,132 $113,196 $7,761 $8,149 $8,556 $8,984 $9,433 Special Events Supervisor I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $31.7019 $38.5385 $5,495 $6,680 $65,940 $80,160 $5,495 $5,770 $6,059 $6,362 $6,680 Special Events Supervisor II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.2385 $42.8365 $6,108 $7,425 $73,296 $89,100 $6,108 $6,413 $6,734 $7,071 $7,425 Stationary Engineer LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.9769 $43.7308 $6,236 $7,580 $74,832 $90,960 $6,236 $6,548 $6,875 $7,219 $7,580 Traffic Control & Lighting Technician I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $31.8923 $38.7635 $5,528 $6,719 $66,336 $80,628 $5,528 $5,804 $6,094 $6,399 $6,719 Traffic Control & Lighting Technician II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.3212 $45.3635 $6,469 $7,863 $77,628 $94,356 $6,469 $6,792 $7,132 $7,489 $7,863 Treatment Plant Mechanic I LOCAL39 7/1/24 $33.9346 $41.2442 $5,882 $7,149 $70,584 $85,788 $5,882 $6,176 $6,485 $6,809 $7,149 Treatment Plant Mechanic II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $37.3212 $45.3635 $6,469 $7,863 $77,628 $94,356 $6,469 $6,792 $7,132 $7,489 $7,863 Water Treatment Plant Apprentice (Steps 1-4) LOCAL39 7/1/24 $24.0462 $4,168 $50,016 $4,168 $4,376 $4,595 $4,825 Water Treatment Plant Apprentice (Steps 5-9) LOCAL39 7/1/24 $35.5154 $6,156 $73,872 $5,065 $5,318 $5,584 $5,863 $6,156 Water Treatment Plant Operator II LOCAL39 7/1/24 $33.0404 $40.1654 $5,727 $6,962 $68,724 $83,544 $5,727 $6,013 $6,314 $6,630 $6,962 Water Treatment Plant Operator III LOCAL39 7/1/24 $36.5192 $44.3827 $6,330 $7,693 $75,960 $92,316 $6,330 $6,646 $6,978 $7,327 $7,693

Page 9 of 17 ends

768
Management City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Business Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4827 $67.4308 $9,617 $11,688 $115,404 $140,256 Capital Improvement Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Chief Building Official MGMT 7/1/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 City Clerk MGMT 7/1/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Code Enforcement Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4827 $67.4308 $9,617 $11,688 $115,404 $140,256 Community Investment Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796 Community Investment Principal Planner MGMT 8/21/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796 Construction & Facilities Development Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Construction Inspection Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $50.2731 $61.0962 $8,714 $10,590 $104,568 $127,080 Court Liaison Officer MGMT 7/1/24 $38.3654 $46.6269 $6,650 $8,082 $79,800 $96,984 Data Services Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $52.6558 $63.9923 $9,127 $11,092 $109,524 $133,104 Economic Development Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796 Equipment and Facilities Superintendent MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4019 $67.3327 $9,603 $11,671 $115,236 $140,052 Finance Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Finance Supervisor MGMT 7/1/24 $52.6558 $63.9923 $9,127 $11,092 $109,524 $133,104 Fire Marshal MGMT 7/1/24 $61.5577 $74.8096 $10,670 $12,967 $128,040 $155,604 Flood Protection Manager MGMT 8/21/24 $64.0038 $77.7865 $11,094 $13,483 $133,128 $161,796 Flood Protection Planner MGMT 7/1/24 $52.7192 $64.0731 $9,138 $11,106 $109,656 $133,272 Geographical Information Systems Supervisor MGMT 1/15/25 $50.2731 $61.0962 $8,714 $10,590 $104,568 $127,080 Home Run Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796 Housing Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796 Human Resources Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Human Resources Supervisor MGMT 7/1/24 $52.6558 $63.9923 $9,127 $11,092 $109,524 $133,104 Information Technology Business Services Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $52.6558 $63.9923 $9,127 $11,092 $109,524 $133,104 Information Technology Manager MGMT 1/15/25 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Information Technology Operations Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4019 $67.3327 $9,603 $11,671 $115,236 $140,052 Parking Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796 Parks Operations Superintendent MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4019 $67.3327 $9,603 $11,671 $115,236 $140,052 Permit Services Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $50.2731 $61.0962 $8,714 $10,590 $104,568 $127,080 Planning Manager MGMT 11/6/24 $61.6154 $74.8788 $10,680 $12,979 $128,160 $155,748 Police Support Services Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $52.7192 $64.0731 $9,138 $11,106 $109,656 $133,272 Preschool Site Supervisor MGMT 7/1/24 $32.9135 $39.9981 $5,705 $6,933 $68,460 $83,196 Principal Engineer MGMT 7/1/24 $64.0038 $77.7865 $11,094 $13,483 $133,128 $161,796 Program Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $42.4731 $51.6173 $7,362 $8,947 $88,344 $107,364 Public Information Officer MGMT 7/1/24 $52.7192 $64.0731 $9,138 $11,106 $109,656 $133,272 Purchasing Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $52.6558 $63.9923 $9,127 $11,092 $109,524 $133,104 Recreation Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $52.6558 $63.9923 $9,127 $11,092 $109,524 $133,104 Senior Analyst MGMT 7/1/24 $48.3058 $58.7077 $8,373 $10,176 $100,476 $122,112 Senior Engineer MGMT 7/1/24 $57.9577 $70.4365 $10,046 $12,209 $120,552 $146,508 Senior Finance Analyst MGMT 7/1/24 $50.3365 $61.1712 $8,725 $10,603 $104,700 $127,236 Senior Planner MGMT 7/1/24 $50.3365 $61.1712 $8,725 $10,603 $104,700 $127,236 Senior Program Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $52.7192 $64.0731 $9,138 $11,106 $109,656 $133,272 Senior Project Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $50.2731 $61.0962 $8,714 $10,590 $104,568 $127,080 Senior Transportation Planner MGMT 7/1/24 $50.3365 $61.1712 $8,725 $10,603 $104,700 $127,236 Supervising Transportation Planner MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4827 $67.4308 $9,617 $11,688 $115,404 $140,256 Sustainability Manager MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4827 $67.4308 $9,617 $11,688 $115,404 $140,256 Utilities Maintenance Superintendent MGMT 7/1/24 $55.4019 $67.3327 $9,603 $11,671 $115,236 $140,052 Water Treatment Plant Superintendent MGMT 7/1/24 $58.0731 $70.5750 $10,066 $12,233 $120,792 $146,796

Page 10 of 17 ends

769
Police Officer's Association City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Code Enforcement Officer I POA 1/13/24 $26.7000 $32.5442 $4,628 $5,641 $55,536 $67,692 $4,628 $4,744 $4,863 $4,985 $5,110 $5,238 $5,369 $5,503 $5,641 Code Enforcement Officer II POA 1/13/24 $29.5212 $35.9654 $5,117 $6,234 $61,404 $74,808 $5,117 $5,245 $5,376 $5,510 $5,648 $5,789 $5,934 $6,082 $6,234 Code Enforcement Officer, Senior POA 1/13/24 $32.6135 $39.7327 $5,653 $6,887 $67,836 $82,644 $5,653 $5,794 $5,939 $6,087 $6,239 $6,395 $6,555 $6,719 $6,887 Community Services Officer I POA 1/13/24 $22.7885 $27.7673 $3,950 $4,813 $47,400 $57,756 $3,950 $4,049 $4,150 $4,254 $4,360 $4,469 $4,581 $4,696 $4,813 Community Services Officer II POA 1/13/24 $25.5346 $31.1077 $4,426 $5,392 $53,112 $64,704 $4,426 $4,537 $4,650 $4,766 $4,885 $5,007 $5,132 $5,260 $5,392 Community Services Officer, Senior POA 1/13/24 $28.5923 $34.8346 $4,956 $6,038 $59,472 $72,456 $4,956 $5,080 $5,207 $5,337 $5,470 $5,607 $5,747 $5,891 $6,038 Crime Analyst I POA 1/13/24 $33.0000 $40.2115 $5,720 $6,970 $68,640 $83,640 $5,720 $5,863 $6,010 $6,160 $6,314 $6,472 $6,634 $6,800 $6,970 Crime Analyst II POA 1/13/24 $37.5000 $45.6923 $6,500 $7,920 $78,000 $95,040 $6,500 $6,663 $6,830 $7,001 $7,176 $7,355 $7,539 $7,727 $7,920 Crime Analyst, Senior POA 1/13/24 $41.9192 $51.0865 $7,266 $8,855 $87,192 $106,260 $7,266 $7,448 $7,634 $7,825 $8,021 $8,222 $8,428 $8,639 $8,855 Crime Scene Investigator I POA 1/13/24 $27.4212 $33.4096 $4,753 $5,791 $57,036 $69,492 $4,753 $4,872 $4,994 $5,119 $5,247 $5,378 $5,512 $5,650 $5,791 Crime Scene Investigator II POA 1/13/24 $30.4962 $37.1481 $5,286 $6,439 $63,432 $77,268 $5,286 $5,418 $5,553 $5,692 $5,834 $5,980 $6,129 $6,282 $6,439 Crime Scene Investigator III POA 1/13/24 $33.3346 $40.6154 $5,778 $7,040 $69,336 $84,480 $5,778 $5,922 $6,070 $6,222 $6,378 $6,537 $6,700 $6,868 $7,040 Police Officer POA 1/13/24 $44.0365 $53.6596 $7,633 $9,301 $91,596 $111,612 $7,633 $7,824 $8,020 $8,220 $8,426 $8,637 $8,853 $9,074 $9,301 Police Records Technician I POA 1/13/24 $21.8481 $26.6250 $3,787 $4,615 $45,444 $55,380 $3,787 $3,882 $3,979 $4,078 $4,180 $4,285 $4,392 $4,502 $4,615 Police Records Technician II POA 1/13/24 $24.0865 $29.3423 $4,175 $5,086 $50,100 $61,032 $4,175 $4,279 $4,386 $4,496 $4,608 $4,723 $4,841 $4,962 $5,086 Police Records Technician, Senior POA 1/13/24 $26.4865 $32.2788 $4,591 $5,595 $55,092 $67,140 $4,591 $4,706 $4,824 $4,945 $5,069 $5,196 $5,326 $5,459 $5,595 Police Sergeant POA 1/13/24 $54.0058 $65.7981 $9,361 $11,405 $112,332 $136,860 $9,361 $9,595 $9,835 $10,081 $10,333 $10,591 $10,856 $11,127 $11,405 Police Services Coordinator POA 1/13/24 $28.6038 $34.8462 $4,958 $6,040 $59,496 $72,480 $4,958 $5,082 $5,209 $5,339 $5,472 $5,609 $5,749 $5,893 $6,040 Property & Evidence Technician I POA 1/13/24 $24.5654 $29.9192 $4,258 $5,186 $51,096 $62,232 $4,258 $4,364 $4,473 $4,585 $4,700 $4,817 $4,937 $5,060 $5,186 Property & Evidence Technician II POA 1/13/24 $27.0173 $32.9135 $4,683 $5,705 $56,196 $68,460 $4,683 $4,800 $4,920 $5,043 $5,169 $5,298 $5,430 $5,566 $5,705 Youth Counselor POA 1/13/24 $33.8250 $41.2154 $5,863 $7,144 $70,356 $85,728 $5,863 $6,010 $6,160 $6,314 $6,472 $6,634 $6,800 $6,970 $7,144

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Code Enforcement Officer I POA 1/13/24 $26.7692 $32.5442 $4,640 $5,641 $55,680 $67,692 $4,640 $4,872 $5,116 $5,372 $5,641 Code Enforcement Officer II POA 1/13/24 $29.5904 $35.9654 $5,129 $6,234 $61,548 $74,808 $5,129 $5,385 $5,654 $5,937 $6,234 Code Enforcement Officer, Senior POA 1/13/24 $32.6942 $39.7327 $5,667 $6,887 $68,004 $82,644 $5,667 $5,950 $6,247 $6,559 $6,887 Community Services Officer I POA 1/13/24 $22.8462 $27.7673 $3,960 $4,813 $47,520 $57,756 $3,960 $4,158 $4,366 $4,584 $4,813 Community Services Officer II POA 1/13/24 $25.5865 $31.1077 $4,435 $5,392 $53,220 $64,704 $4,435 $4,657 $4,890 $5,135 $5,392 Community Services Officer, Senior POA 1/13/24 $28.6558 $34.8346 $4,967 $6,038 $59,604 $72,456 $4,967 $5,215 $5,476 $5,750 $6,038 Crime Analyst I POA 1/13/24 $33.0808 $40.2115 $5,734 $6,970 $68,808 $83,640 $5,734 $6,021 $6,322 $6,638 $6,970 Crime Analyst II POA 1/13/24 $37.5923 $45.6923 $6,516 $7,920 $78,192 $95,040 $6,516 $6,842 $7,184 $7,543 $7,920 Crime Analyst, Senior POA 1/13/24 $42.0288 $51.0865 $7,285 $8,855 $87,420 $106,260 $7,285 $7,649 $8,031 $8,433 $8,855 Crime Scene Investigator I POA 1/13/24 $27.4846 $33.4096 $4,764 $5,791 $57,168 $69,492 $4,764 $5,002 $5,252 $5,515 $5,791 Crime Scene Investigator II POA 1/13/24 $30.5596 $37.1481 $5,297 $6,439 $63,564 $77,268 $5,297 $5,562 $5,840 $6,132 $6,439 Crime Scene Investigator III POA 1/13/24 $33.4154 $40.6154 $5,792 $7,040 $69,504 $84,480 $5,792 $6,082 $6,386 $6,705 $7,040 Police Officer POA 1/13/24 $44.1404 $53.6596 $7,651 $9,301 $91,812 $111,612 $7,651 $8,034 $8,436 $8,858 $9,301 Police Records Technician I POA 1/13/24 $21.9058 $26.6250 $3,797 $4,615 $45,564 $55,380 $3,797 $3,987 $4,186 $4,395 $4,615 Police Records Technician II POA 1/13/24 $24.1385 $29.3423 $4,184 $5,086 $50,208 $61,032 $4,184 $4,393 $4,613 $4,844 $5,086 Police Records Technician, Senior POA 1/13/24 $26.5558 $32.2788 $4,603 $5,595 $55,236 $67,140 $4,603 $4,833 $5,075 $5,329 $5,595 Police Sergeant POA 1/13/24 $54.1327 $65.7981 $9,383 $11,405 $112,596 $136,860 $9,383 $9,852 $10,345 $10,862 $11,405 Police Services Coordinator POA 1/13/24 $28.6673 $34.8462 $4,969 $6,040 $59,628 $72,480 $4,969 $5,217 $5,478 $5,752 $6,040 Property & Evidence Technician I POA 1/13/24 $24.6173 $29.9192 $4,267 $5,186 $51,204 $62,232 $4,267 $4,480 $4,704 $4,939 $5,186 Property & Evidence Technician II POA 1/13/24 $27.0750 $32.9135 $4,693 $5,705 $56,316 $68,460 $4,693 $4,928 $5,174 $5,433 $5,705 Youth Counselor POA 1/13/24 $33.9058 $41.2154 $5,877 $7,144 $70,524 $85,728 $5,877 $6,171 $6,480 $6,804 $7,144

SALARY SCHEDULE B

SALARY SCHEDULE A

Page 11 of 17 ends

770
Police Manager's City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Police Lieutenant POLMGT 1/13/24 $68.6423 $83.6308 $11,898 $14,496 $142,776 $173,952 $11,898 $12,195 $12,500 $12,812 $13,132 $13,460 $13,797 $14,142 $14,496

POSITION TITLE BARGAINING
UNIT
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Police Lieutenant POLMGT 1/13/24 $68.8154 $83.6308 $11,928 $14,496 $143,136 $173,952

SALARY SCHEDULE A

SALARY SCHEDULE B

Page 12 of 17 ends

771
Recruit City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Fire Recruit RECRUIT 6/1/24 $35.3365 $6,125 $73,500
Police Recruit RECRUIT 1/13/24 $35.2269 $6,106 $73,272

Page 13 of 17 ends

772
Safety Management City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM

STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Deputy Fire Chief SAFEMGT 11/6/24 $78.2827 $95.1404 $13,569 $16,491 $162,828 $197,892 Deputy Police Chief SAFEMGT 7/1/24 $78.2827 $95.1404 $13,569 $16,491 $162,828 $197,892

Page 14 of 17 ends

773
Specialist & Professionals City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Accountant I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.8231 $42.4385 $6,036 $7,356 $72,432 $88,272 $6,036 $6,187 $6,342 $6,501 $6,664 $6,831 $7,002 $7,177 $7,356 Accountant II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7250 $49.6212 $7,059 $8,601 $84,708 $103,212 $7,059 $7,235 $7,416 $7,601 $7,791 $7,986 $8,186 $8,391 $8,601 Administrative Analyst I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.8462 $42.4673 $6,040 $7,361 $72,480 $88,332 $6,040 $6,191 $6,346 $6,505 $6,668 $6,835 $7,006 $7,181 $7,361 Administrative Analyst II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.3577 $51.6173 $7,342 $8,947 $88,104 $107,364 $7,342 $7,526 $7,714 $7,907 $8,105 $8,308 $8,516 $8,729 $8,947 Assistant Community Investment Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.8462 $42.4673 $6,040 $7,361 $72,480 $88,332 $6,040 $6,191 $6,346 $6,505 $6,668 $6,835 $7,006 $7,181 $7,361 Assistant Engineer SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.3231 $51.5596 $7,336 $8,937 $88,032 $107,244 $7,336 $7,519 $7,707 $7,900 $8,097 $8,299 $8,506 $8,719 $8,937 Assistant Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.8462 $42.4673 $6,040 $7,361 $72,480 $88,332 $6,040 $6,191 $6,346 $6,505 $6,668 $6,835 $7,006 $7,181 $7,361 Assistant Transportation Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.8462 $42.4673 $6,040 $7,361 $72,480 $88,332 $6,040 $6,191 $6,346 $6,505 $6,668 $6,835 $7,006 $7,181 $7,361 Associate Community Investment Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7885 $49.6962 $7,070 $8,614 $84,840 $103,368 $7,070 $7,247 $7,428 $7,614 $7,804 $7,999 $8,199 $8,404 $8,614 Associate Engineer SPECPROF 7/1/24 $50.2038 $61.1712 $8,702 $10,603 $104,424 $127,236 $8,702 $8,920 $9,143 $9,372 $9,606 $9,846 $10,092 $10,344 $10,603 Associate Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7885 $49.6962 $7,070 $8,614 $84,840 $103,368 $7,070 $7,247 $7,428 $7,614 $7,804 $7,999 $8,199 $8,404 $8,614 Associate Transportation Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7885 $49.6962 $7,070 $8,614 $84,840 $103,368 $7,070 $7,247 $7,428 $7,614 $7,804 $7,999 $8,199 $8,404 $8,614 Building Inspector I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.8788 $43.7077 $6,219 $7,576 $74,628 $90,912 $6,219 $6,374 $6,533 $6,696 $6,863 $7,035 $7,211 $7,391 $7,576 Building Inspector II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7250 $49.6212 $7,059 $8,601 $84,708 $103,212 $7,059 $7,235 $7,416 $7,601 $7,791 $7,986 $8,186 $8,391 $8,601 CALEA Coordinator SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.3577 $51.6173 $7,342 $8,947 $88,104 $107,364 $7,342 $7,526 $7,714 $7,907 $8,105 $8,308 $8,516 $8,729 $8,947 Construction Administrative Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Construction Inspector I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.8788 $43.7077 $6,219 $7,576 $74,628 $90,912 $6,219 $6,374 $6,533 $6,696 $6,863 $7,035 $7,211 $7,391 $7,576 Construction Inspector II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7250 $49.6212 $7,059 $8,601 $84,708 $103,212 $7,059 $7,235 $7,416 $7,601 $7,791 $7,986 $8,186 $8,391 $8,601 Construction Inspector III SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0750 $54.9173 $7,813 $9,519 $93,756 $114,228 $7,813 $8,008 $8,208 $8,413 $8,623 $8,839 $9,060 $9,287 $9,519 Court Liaison Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $26.2269 $31.9558 $4,546 $5,539 $54,552 $66,468 $4,546 $4,660 $4,777 $4,896 $5,018 $5,143 $5,272 $5,404 $5,539 Deputy City Clerk SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Engineering Assistant I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.8788 $43.7077 $6,219 $7,576 $74,628 $90,912 $6,219 $6,374 $6,533 $6,696 $6,863 $7,035 $7,211 $7,391 $7,576 Engineering Assistant II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7250 $49.6212 $7,059 $8,601 $84,708 $103,212 $7,059 $7,235 $7,416 $7,601 $7,791 $7,986 $8,186 $8,391 $8,601 Engineering Assistant III SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0750 $54.9173 $7,813 $9,519 $93,756 $114,228 $7,813 $8,008 $8,208 $8,413 $8,623 $8,839 $9,060 $9,287 $9,519 Finance Analyst SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0923 $54.9346 $7,816 $9,522 $93,792 $114,264 $7,816 $8,011 $8,211 $8,416 $8,626 $8,842 $9,063 $9,290 $9,522 Financial Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Fire Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.8788 $43.7077 $6,219 $7,576 $74,628 $90,912 $6,219 $6,374 $6,533 $6,696 $6,863 $7,035 $7,211 $7,391 $7,576 Information Technology Specialist I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $37.7077 $45.9346 $6,536 $7,962 $78,432 $95,544 $6,536 $6,699 $6,866 $7,038 $7,214 $7,394 $7,579 $7,768 $7,962 Information Technology Specialist II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.3577 $51.6173 $7,342 $8,947 $88,104 $107,364 $7,342 $7,526 $7,714 $7,907 $8,105 $8,308 $8,516 $8,729 $8,947 Landscape Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.8788 $43.7077 $6,219 $7,576 $74,628 $90,912 $6,219 $6,374 $6,533 $6,696 $6,863 $7,035 $7,211 $7,391 $7,576 Plans Examiner I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.8788 $43.7077 $6,219 $7,576 $74,628 $90,912 $6,219 $6,374 $6,533 $6,696 $6,863 $7,035 $7,211 $7,391 $7,576 Plans Examiner II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7250 $49.6212 $7,059 $8,601 $84,708 $103,212 $7,059 $7,235 $7,416 $7,601 $7,791 $7,986 $8,186 $8,391 $8,601 Police Records Supervisor SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9019 $43.7423 $6,223 $7,582 $74,676 $90,984 $6,223 $6,379 $6,538 $6,701 $6,869 $7,041 $7,217 $7,397 $7,582 Preschool Teacher SPECPROF 7/1/24 $19.9038 $24.2538 $3,450 $4,204 $41,400 $50,448 $3,450 $3,536 $3,624 $3,715 $3,808 $3,903 $4,001 $4,101 $4,204 Preschool Teacher/Family Support Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $20.1404 $24.5365 $3,491 $4,253 $41,892 $51,036 $3,491 $3,578 $3,667 $3,759 $3,853 $3,949 $4,048 $4,149 $4,253 Program Technician I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $26.7577 $32.6019 $4,638 $5,651 $55,656 $67,812 $4,638 $4,754 $4,873 $4,995 $5,120 $5,248 $5,379 $5,513 $5,651 Program Technician II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Project Manager I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7885 $49.6962 $7,070 $8,614 $84,840 $103,368 $7,070 $7,247 $7,428 $7,614 $7,804 $7,999 $8,199 $8,404 $8,614 Project Manager II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0981 $54.9404 $7,817 $9,523 $93,804 $114,276 $7,817 $8,012 $8,212 $8,417 $8,627 $8,843 $9,064 $9,291 $9,523 Senior Accountant SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0750 $54.9173 $7,813 $9,519 $93,756 $114,228 $7,813 $8,008 $8,208 $8,413 $8,623 $8,839 $9,060 $9,287 $9,519 Senior Building Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0750 $54.9173 $7,813 $9,519 $93,756 $114,228 $7,813 $8,008 $8,208 $8,413 $8,623 $8,839 $9,060 $9,287 $9,519 Senior Deputy City Clerk SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.8231 $42.4385 $6,036 $7,356 $72,432 $88,272 $6,036 $6,187 $6,342 $6,501 $6,664 $6,831 $7,002 $7,177 $7,356 Senior Fire Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7712 $49.6788 $7,067 $8,611 $84,804 $103,332 $7,067 $7,244 $7,425 $7,611 $7,801 $7,996 $8,196 $8,401 $8,611 Senior Landscape Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.7712 $49.6788 $7,067 $8,611 $84,804 $103,332 $7,067 $7,244 $7,425 $7,611 $7,801 $7,996 $8,196 $8,401 $8,611 Senior Plans Examiner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.0750 $54.9173 $7,813 $9,519 $93,756 $114,228 $7,813 $8,008 $8,208 $8,413 $8,623 $8,839 $9,060 $9,287 $9,519 Technical Support Specialist I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $26.7519 $32.5962 $4,637 $5,650 $55,644 $67,800 $4,637 $4,753 $4,872 $4,994 $5,119 $5,247 $5,378 $5,512 $5,650 Technical Support Specialist II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9058 $37.6558 $5,357 $6,527 $64,284 $78,324 $5,357 $5,491 $5,628 $5,769 $5,913 $6,061 $6,213 $6,368 $6,527 Technical Support Specialist III SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9019 $43.7423 $6,223 $7,582 $74,676 $90,984 $6,223 $6,379 $6,538 $6,701 $6,869 $7,041 $7,217 $7,397 $7,582

SALARY SCHEDULE B

Page 15 of 17 ends

774
Specialist & Professionals City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025

POSITION TITLE EMPLOYEE
GROUP
SALARY

EFFECTIVE
HOURLY

MINIMUM
HOURLY

MAXIMUM

MONTHLY

MINIMUM

MONTHLY

MAXIMUM
ANNUAL

MINIMUM
ANNUAL

MAXIMUM STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E STEP F STEP G STEP H STEP I Accountant I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.9096 $42.4385 $6,051 $7,356 $72,612 $88,272 $6,051 $6,354 $6,672 $7,006 $7,356 Accountant II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8231 $49.6212 $7,076 $8,601 $84,912 $103,212 $7,076 $7,430 $7,801 $8,191 $8,601 Administrative Analyst I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.9327 $42.4673 $6,055 $7,361 $72,660 $88,332 $6,055 $6,358 $6,676 $7,010 $7,361 Administrative Analyst II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.4673 $51.6173 $7,361 $8,947 $88,332 $107,364 $7,361 $7,729 $8,115 $8,521 $8,947 Assistant Community Investment Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.9327 $42.4673 $6,055 $7,361 $72,660 $88,332 $6,055 $6,358 $6,676 $7,010 $7,361 Assistant Engineer SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.4154 $51.5596 $7,352 $8,937 $88,224 $107,244 $7,352 $7,720 $8,106 $8,511 $8,937 Assistant Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.9327 $42.4673 $6,055 $7,361 $72,660 $88,332 $6,055 $6,358 $6,676 $7,010 $7,361 Assistant Transportation Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.9327 $42.4673 $6,055 $7,361 $72,660 $88,332 $6,055 $6,358 $6,676 $7,010 $7,361 Associate Community Investment Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8865 $49.6962 $7,087 $8,614 $85,044 $103,368 $7,087 $7,441 $7,813 $8,204 $8,614 Associate Engineer SPECPROF 7/1/24 $50.3250 $61.1712 $8,723 $10,603 $104,676 $127,236 $8,723 $9,159 $9,617 $10,098 $10,603 Associate Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8865 $49.6962 $7,087 $8,614 $85,044 $103,368 $7,087 $7,441 $7,813 $8,204 $8,614 Associate Transportation Planner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8865 $49.6962 $7,087 $8,614 $85,044 $103,368 $7,087 $7,441 $7,813 $8,204 $8,614 Building Inspector I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9538 $43.7077 $6,232 $7,576 $74,784 $90,912 $6,232 $6,544 $6,871 $7,215 $7,576 Building Inspector II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8231 $49.6212 $7,076 $8,601 $84,912 $103,212 $7,076 $7,430 $7,801 $8,191 $8,601 CALEA Coordinator SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.4673 $51.6173 $7,361 $8,947 $88,332 $107,364 $7,361 $7,729 $8,115 $8,521 $8,947 Construction Administrative Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9808 $37.6558 $5,370 $6,527 $64,440 $78,324 $5,370 $5,638 $5,920 $6,216 $6,527 Construction Inspector I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9538 $43.7077 $6,232 $7,576 $74,784 $90,912 $6,232 $6,544 $6,871 $7,215 $7,576 Construction Inspector II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8231 $49.6212 $7,076 $8,601 $84,912 $103,212 $7,076 $7,430 $7,801 $8,191 $8,601 Construction Inspector III SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.1788 $54.9173 $7,831 $9,519 $93,972 $114,228 $7,831 $8,223 $8,634 $9,066 $9,519 Court Liaison Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $26.2904 $31.9558 $4,557 $5,539 $54,684 $66,468 $4,557 $4,785 $5,024 $5,275 $5,539 Deputy City Clerk SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9808 $37.6558 $5,370 $6,527 $64,440 $78,324 $5,370 $5,638 $5,920 $6,216 $6,527 Engineering Assistant I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9538 $43.7077 $6,232 $7,576 $74,784 $90,912 $6,232 $6,544 $6,871 $7,215 $7,576 Engineering Assistant II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8231 $49.6212 $7,076 $8,601 $84,912 $103,212 $7,076 $7,430 $7,801 $8,191 $8,601 Engineering Assistant III SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.1788 $54.9173 $7,831 $9,519 $93,972 $114,228 $7,831 $8,223 $8,634 $9,066 $9,519 Finance Analyst SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.1962 $54.9346 $7,834 $9,522 $94,008 $114,264 $7,834 $8,226 $8,637 $9,069 $9,522 Financial Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9808 $37.6558 $5,370 $6,527 $64,440 $78,324 $5,370 $5,638 $5,920 $6,216 $6,527 Fire Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9538 $43.7077 $6,232 $7,576 $74,784 $90,912 $6,232 $6,544 $6,871 $7,215 $7,576 Information Technology Specialist I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $37.7885 $45.9346 $6,550 $7,962 $78,600 $95,544 $6,550 $6,878 $7,222 $7,583 $7,962 Information Technology Specialist II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $42.4673 $51.6173 $7,361 $8,947 $88,332 $107,364 $7,361 $7,729 $8,115 $8,521 $8,947 Landscape Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9538 $43.7077 $6,232 $7,576 $74,784 $90,912 $6,232 $6,544 $6,871 $7,215 $7,576 Plans Examiner I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9538 $43.7077 $6,232 $7,576 $74,784 $90,912 $6,232 $6,544 $6,871 $7,215 $7,576 Plans Examiner II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8231 $49.6212 $7,076 $8,601 $84,912 $103,212 $7,076 $7,430 $7,801 $8,191 $8,601 Police Records Supervisor SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9885 $43.7423 $6,238 $7,582 $74,856 $90,984 $6,238 $6,550 $6,877 $7,221 $7,582 Preschool Teacher SPECPROF 7/1/24 $19.9500 $24.2538 $3,458 $4,204 $41,496 $50,448 $3,458 $3,631 $3,813 $4,004 $4,204 Preschool Teacher/Family Support Specialist SPECPROF 7/1/24 $20.1808 $24.5365 $3,498 $4,253 $41,976 $51,036 $3,498 $3,673 $3,857 $4,050 $4,253 Program Technician I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $26.8269 $32.6019 $4,650 $5,651 $55,800 $67,812 $4,650 $4,882 $5,126 $5,382 $5,651 Program Technician II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9808 $37.6558 $5,370 $6,527 $64,440 $78,324 $5,370 $5,638 $5,920 $6,216 $6,527 Project Manager I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8865 $49.6962 $7,087 $8,614 $85,044 $103,368 $7,087 $7,441 $7,813 $8,204 $8,614 Project Manager II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.2019 $54.9404 $7,835 $9,523 $94,020 $114,276 $7,835 $8,227 $8,638 $9,070 $9,523 Senior Accountant SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.1788 $54.9173 $7,831 $9,519 $93,972 $114,228 $7,831 $8,223 $8,634 $9,066 $9,519 Senior Building Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.1788 $54.9173 $7,831 $9,519 $93,972 $114,228 $7,831 $8,223 $8,634 $9,066 $9,519 Senior Deputy City Clerk SPECPROF 7/1/24 $34.9096 $42.4385 $6,051 $7,356 $72,612 $88,272 $6,051 $6,354 $6,672 $7,006 $7,356 Senior Fire Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8692 $49.6788 $7,084 $8,611 $85,008 $103,332 $7,084 $7,438 $7,810 $8,201 $8,611 Senior Landscape Inspector SPECPROF 7/1/24 $40.8692 $49.6788 $7,084 $8,611 $85,008 $103,332 $7,084 $7,438 $7,810 $8,201 $8,611 Senior Plans Examiner SPECPROF 7/1/24 $45.1788 $54.9173 $7,831 $9,519 $93,972 $114,228 $7,831 $8,223 $8,634 $9,066 $9,519 Technical Support Specialist I SPECPROF 7/1/24 $26.8212 $32.5962 $4,649 $5,650 $55,788 $67,800 $4,649 $4,881 $5,125 $5,381 $5,650 Technical Support Specialist II SPECPROF 7/1/24 $30.9808 $37.6558 $5,370 $6,527 $64,440 $78,324 $5,370 $5,638 $5,920 $6,216 $6,527 Technical Support Specialist III SPECPROF 7/1/24 $35.9885 $43.7423 $6,238 $7,582 $74,856 $90,984 $6,238 $6,550 $6,877 $7,221 $7,582

SALARY SCHEDULE A

Page 16 of 17 ends

775
Extra Help City of West Sacramento
2024/2025 Classification Plan
Approved: 1/15/2025
POSITION TITLE SALARY EFFECTIVE Minimum Hourly Maximum Hourly Assistant Pool Manager 1/1/2024 $17.50 $18.25
Designated Level I Reserve Police Officer 1/1/2024 $25.50 $30.50 Emergency Services Coordinator 1/1/2024 $55.00 $55.00
Laborer 1/1/2025 $16.50 $19.00
Lead Program Leader 3/9/2024 $23.00 $25.50
Lead Recreation Leader 1/1/2024 $18.25 $19.25
Lifeguard/Swim Instructor 1/1/2025 $16.50 $17.50
Parking/Traffic Enforcement Officer 1/1/2024 $18.50 $21.25 Planning Commissioner 1/1/2024 $30 per meeting
Pool Manager 1/1/2024 $18.25 $19.25
Program Aide 1/1/2025 $16.50 $18.50
Program Assistant 1/1/2025 $16.50 $21.00
Program Leader 3/9/2024 $18.50 $21.00
Program Site Leader 3/9/2024 $21.00 $23.50
Recreation Aide 1/1/2025 $16.50 $16.50
Recreation Assistant 1/1/2024 $19.25 $21.00
Recreation Leader 1/1/2025 $16.50 $17.50
Retired Annuitant 1/1/2025 $16.50 $77.00
Senior Parking/Traffic Enforcement Officer 1/1/2024 $21.75 $24.50 Senior Recreation Leader 1/1/2024 $17.50 $18.25
Student Intern 1/1/2025 $16.50 $21.00
Substitute Preschool Teacher 1/1/2025 $16.50 $18.25
Salary increases at $0.25 increments with a maximum of $1.00.

Page 17 of 17 ends

776
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Cover Page
Approved: 1/15/2025
Effective: 1/15/2025
City of West Sacramento
Authorized Position List
Fiscal Year 2024 / 2025
Total Authorized Positions:
448.55
777
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Capital Projects
Approved: 1/15/2025
Effective: 1/15/2025

POSITION
101-9653Engineering101-9654Inspection Engineering652-9040Flood Protection 101-9651Engineering Administration101-9652Facilities Development104-9657 Real Property Management Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 1 1 2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT MANAGER 0.25 0.5 0.25 1
CONSTRUCTION & FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT MANAGER 0.5 0.5 1 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SPECIALIST 0.5 0.5 1
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION MANAGER 1 1
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR I/II/III 5 5
DIRECTOR OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 1 1
ENGINEER SERIES (ASSISTANT/ASSOCIATE/SENIOR) 7 1 8
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I/II/III 2 2
ENGINEERING/GIS TECHNICIAN 1 1
FINANCIAL SPECIALIST 1 1
FLOOD PROTECTION MANAGER 1 1
FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNER 1 1
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST I/II 1 1
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 1 1
PROGRAM MANAGER/SENIOR 1 1
PROJECT MANAGER I/II/SENIOR 5 5
SECRETARY 1 1
Grand Total 9.25 7 5 6.5 6.25 1 35.00
778
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
City Manager's Office
Approved: 1/15/2025
Effective: 1/15/2025

POSITION
104-9016City Manager's Office104-9022City Clerk104-9024Human Resources104-9026Community Relations104-9034Information Technology106-9020Economic Development110-9017Kids Home Run Initiative110-9018Smart City Initiatives516-9700Port Administration 104-9021Government Relations650-9035Geographical Information Systems Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 1 1
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK I/II/III 1 1
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER 0.62 0.2 0.08 0.1 1
CITY CLERK 1 1
CITY MANAGER 0.55 0.2 0.25 1
DATA SERVICES MANAGER 0.5 0.5 1
DEPUTY CITY CLERK I/II/SENIOR 1.925 0.075 2
DEPUTY CITY MANAGER 0.33 0.33 0.34 1
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER 0.75 0.05 0.2 1 GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPERVISOR 1 1
HOME RUN MANAGER 1 1
HUMAN RESOURCES & PAYROLL TECHNICIAN I/II 5 5
HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST I/II 1 1
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER 1 1
HUMAN RESOURCES SUPERVISOR 1 1
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS SERVICES MANAGER 1 1
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGER 1 1
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS MANAGER 1 1
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST I/II 6 1 7
PAYROLL ADMINISTRATOR 1 1
PORT GENERAL MANAGER 1 1
PROGRAM MANAGER/SENIOR 1 1 1 3
PROGRAM TECHNICIAN I/II 1 2 3
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER 1 1
TECHNICAL SUPPORT SPECIALIST I/II/III 3 1 4
Grand Total 3.92 3.925 9 2.33 13.2 0.33 4.5 1.83 2.625 0.34 1 43.00 *Flood General Manager eliminated effective 1/1/2025.

Note: Flood Division moving to Capital Projects effective 1/1/2025. 779
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Community Development
Approved: 1/15/2025
Effective: 1/15/2025

POSITION
101-9130Code Enforcement108-9130Code Enforcement650-9310Comm Development Admin.650-9315Building Inspection650-9321Dev/Traffic Engineering 650-9311Planning106-9311Planning653-9661Sustainability 101-9655Transportation and Mobility106-9655Transportation and Mobility Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 1 3 4
ASSISTANT/ASSOCIATE PLANNER 1 1
BUILDING INSPECTOR I/II/SENIOR 2.5 2.5
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL 1 1
CLERK/SENIOR CLERK 1 1
CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER 1 1
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I/II/SENIOR 3 1 4
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 1
ENGINEER SERIES (ASSISTANT/ASSOCIATE/SENIOR)* 3 1 4
ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/II/III** 1 1
PERMIT SERVICES MANAGER 1 1
PERMIT TECHNICIAN I/II 2.5 0.5 3
PLANNING MANAGER 1 1
PLANNING TECHNICIAN 1 1
PLANS EXAMINER I/II/SENIOR 1.5 1.5
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 1 1
PROGRAM TECHNICIAN I/II 1 1
SECRETARY 1 1 2
SENIOR PLANNER 2 1 3
SUPERVISING TRANSPORTATION PLANNER 1 1
SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER 1 1
TRANSPORTATION PLANNER SERIES (ASSISTANT/ASSOCIATE/SENIOR) 2 2 Grand Total 5 1 4 8.5 5.5 5 1 5 3 1 39.00
Note*: 1.0 FTE Engineer Series in 650-9321 may be filled at lower level Engineer Assistant I/II/III or Engineering Technician I/II/III.

Note*: 1.0 FTE Engineer Assistant I/II/III may be filled at lower level Engineering Technician I/II/III. 780
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Economic Development & Housing
Approved: 1/15/2025
Effective: 1/15/2025

POSITION
106-9020Economic Development219-9328Parking Activities
218-9019Homeless Program
Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 1 1
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT MANAGER 1 1
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PLANNER SERIES (ASSISTANT/ASSOCIATE) 2 2 COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PRINCIPAL PLANNER 1 1
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING 1 1
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER 1 1
HOUSING MANAGER 1 1
PARKING MANAGER 1 1
PROGRAM MANAGER/SENIOR 2 1 3
PROGRAM TECHNICIAN I/II 1 1
SECRETARY 1 1
Grand Total 10 2 2 14.00
781
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Finance
Approved: 1/15/2025
Effective: 1/15/2025

POSITION
104-9050Finance Administration104-9051Finance Fiscal Records104-9052Finance Revenue Collections 104-9053 Procurement & Contracting104-9054Budget & Financial Planning Grand Total
ACCOUNTANT I/II/SENIOR 3 3
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN I/II/III 2 5 7
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 2 2
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 1
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 1 1
FINANCE ANALYST/SENIOR 1 2 3
FINANCE MANAGER 1 0.2 0.8 2
FINANCE SUPERVISOR 1 1 2
PURCHASING MANAGER 1 1
Grand Total 2 7 6.2 4 2.8 22.00
782
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Fire
Approved: 1/15/2025
Effective: 1/15/2025

POSITION
101-9153Fire - Hazardous Materials108-9151Fire Operations 101-9150Fire - Administration101-9151Fire - Operations101-9152Fire Prevention Services256-9158SAFER - Grant Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 1 1 2
DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 1 1
FINANCIAL SPECIALIST 1 1
FIRE BATTALION CHIEF 4 4
FIRE CAPTAIN 19 19
FIRE CHIEF 1 1
FIRE ENGINEER 18 18
FIRE FIGHTER 2 14 9 25
FIRE INSPECTOR/SENIOR 2 2
FIRE MARSHAL 0.9 0.1 1
PLANS EXAMINER I/II/SENIOR 1 1
Grand Total 3.9 2 4.1 55 1 9 75.00
783
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Parks & Recreation
Approved: 1/15/2025
Effective: 1/15/2025

POSITION
101-9500Parks & Recreation Admin101-9510Recreation Activities254-9555Discovery Preschool Program 110-9019Homeless ProgramVarious Community Facilities Districts (CFD)213-9175Landscape & Lighting 108-9515Recreation Center101-9520Parks & Trail Maintenance110-9520Parks & Trail Maintenance Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 2 2
BUSINESS MANAGER 1 1
CHIEF PARKS & GROUNDS WORKER 0.8 3.2 4
DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION 1 1
GROUNDSKEEPER 1 4 1 6
LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR/SENIOR 0.8 0.2 1
PARKS & GROUNDS WORKER/SENIOR 1 7 8
PARKS OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDENT 1 1
PRESCHOOL SITE SUPERVISOR 0.8 0.8
PRESCHOOL TEACHER 0.75 0.75
PROJECT MANAGER I/II/SENIOR 0.8 0.2 1
RECREATION COORDINATOR 6.56 0.44 7
RECREATION MANAGER 2 2
RECREATION SUPERVISOR I/II 6 6
SECRETARY 1 1
SPECIAL EVENTS SUPERVISOR I/II 1 1
Grand Total 6 14.56 1.55 2 2.4 0.4 0.44 15.2 1 43.55

0.8 FTE Chief Parks & Grounds Worker: Various Community Facilities Districts: 269-9176/5.01%, 269-9177/8.64%, 269-9178/16.51%, 269- 9179/12.64%, 269-9180/3.07%, 269-9181/1.45%, 269-9182/0.41%, 269-9183/7.21%, 269-9184/4.89%, 269-9185/4.63%, 269-9186/3.07%, 269-9188/1.66%, 269-9189/5.48%, 269-9193/2.43%, 269-9194/2.90%

0.8 FTE Project Manager I/II/Senior & Landscape Inspector/Senior: Various Community Facilities Districts: 269-9176/3.46%, 269- 9177/9.01%, 269-9178/16.51%, 269-9179/8.01%, 269-9180/3.87%, 269-9181/1.33%, 269-9182/0.64%, 269-9183/13.69%, 269- 9184/1.48%, 269-9185/3.24%, 269-9186/4.04%, 269-9188/3.64%, 269-9189/3.82%, 269-9192/0.71%, 269-9193/2.38%, 269-9194/3.62%, 269-9195/0.55%,
784
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Police
Approved: 1/15/2025
Effective: 1/15/2025

POSITION
101-9110Police - Administration101-9111Police - Investigations101-9113Police - Patrol101-9116Police - Traffic/ParkingSafety108-9111Police - Investigations 101-9112Police - Records101-9114Police - COS110-9019Homeless Program111-9110Police - Administration111-9113Police - Patrol101-9117Police - C.L.O. Program Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 4 2 6
BUSINESS MANAGER 1 1
CALEA COORDINATOR 1 1
CLERK/SENIOR CLERK 1 1
COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICER I/II/SENIOR 4 2 6
COURT LIAISON OFFICER 0.5 0.5
COURT LIAISON SPECIALIST 0.5 0.5
CRIME ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 1 1
CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATOR I/II/III 2 2
DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF 1 1
FINANCIAL SPECIALIST 1 1
POLICE CHIEF 1 1
POLICE LIEUTENANT 2 1 2 5
POLICE OFFICER 10 43 3 1 57
POLICE RECORDS SUPERVISOR 1 1
POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN I/II/SENIOR 6 6
POLICE SERGEANT 1 1 8 1 2 13
POLICE SERVICES COORDINATOR 1 1
POLICE SUPPORT SERVICES MANAGER 1 1
PROGRAM MANAGER/SENIOR 1 1
PROGRAM TECHNICIAN I/II 1 1
PROPERTY/EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN I/II 2 2
SECRETARY 1 1 1 3
YOUTH COUNSELOR 1 1
Grand Total 14 17 57 4 3 9 4 2 1 2 1 114.00
NOTE: 5.0 FTE Police Officer positions in General Fund 101 designated as unfunded 785
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Public Works O & M
Approved: 1/15/2025
Effective: 1/15/2025

POSITION
104-9325City Facility Project & Maint108-9205Street Sweeping Maintenance108-9210Road Maintenance201-9205Street Sweeping Maintenance201-9210Road Maintenance215-9230Storm Water Maint-MS4501-9410Sewer Collection506-9610Water Treatment506-9611Water Distribution506-9612Water Backflow Prevention Prg 610-9650Public Works O&M Administration104-9326Fleet Maintenance101-9212Traffic/Transportation Operations218-9019Homeless Program108-9515Recreation Center Grand Total
ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST I/II/SENIOR 2 2
CHIEF FACILITIES MAINTENANCE WORKER 1 1
CHIEF MAINTENANCE WORKER 1 1 1 3
CHIEF TREATMENT PLANT MECHANIC 0.5 0.5 1
CLERK/SENIOR CLERK 1 1
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE 1 1
ELECTRICAL TECHNICIAN 1 1 2
ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I/II/III* 1 1
EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES SUPERINTENDENT 0.5 0.5 1
EQUIPMENT MECHANIC I/II 3 3
FACILITIES MAINTENTANCE WORKER/AIDE/SENIOR 3 1 4
INSTRUMENTATION TECHNICIAN 1 1
MAINTENANCE WORKER/SENIOR 1 1 1 4 2 7 7 2 25
SECRETARY 1 1
SENIOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR 1 1
STATIONARY ENGINEER 2 1 3
TRAFFIC CONTROL & LIGHTING TECHNICIAN I/II* 1 1
TREATMENT PLANT MECHANIC I/II 2 1 3
UTILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1 WATER METER TECHNICIAN 1 1
WATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR APPRENTICE/II/III 5 5
WATER TREATMENT SUPERINTENDENT 1 1
Grand Total 6.5 1 2 1 4.25 2.25 11.75 10.5 9.25 2 5 3.5 2 1 1 63.00 Unfund 1.0 FTE Engineering Assistant I/II/II and Traffic Control & Lighting Technician I/II from 101-9112. 786
Authorized Position List 2024/2025
Summary Amendments
Approved: 1/15/2025
Effective: 1/15/2025
Date Dept Approved By Amendment
7/1/2024 City Manager's Office City Council
Reclassify 1.0 Human Resources Analyst/Senior to 1.0 Human Resources Supervisor in 104-9024. Reclassify 1.0 FTE Business Manager to 1.0 FTE Home Run Manager in 110-9017. Change 0.5 FTE Program Manager/Senior from 104-9016 to 516-9700. Change 0.5 FTE Administrative Analyst I/II/Senior from 110-9016 to 104-9016. Add 1.0 FTE Flood Protection Manager to 652-9040. 7/1/2024 Economic Development & Housing City Council Add 1.0 FTE Community Investment Principal Planner to 106-9020 7/1/2024 Parks & Recreation City Council Add 1.0 Groundskeeper to 101-9520 approved 8/16/2023. Add 1.0 FTE Administrative Analyst I/II/Senior to 101-9500 7/1/2024 Police City Council Add 1.0 Financial Specialist to 101-9110 7/1/2024 Community Development City Council Retitle Traffic/Transportation Division to Transportation & Mobility. Retitle Environmental Services Division to Sustainability. Retitle Environmental Services & Sustainability Manager to Sustainability Manager. 9/19/2024 Community Development Correction Correct 1.0 FTE Engineer Series (Junior/Assistant/Associate/Senior) incorrectly listed in 101-9655 to 106-9655 effective 7/1/2023. 11/6/2024 Community Development City Council Eliminate 1.0 FTE Principal Planner from 650-9311 and add 1.0 FTE 650-9311. 11/6/2024 Fire City Council Add 3.0 FTE Firefighters to 256-9158. Move 6.0 FTE firefighters from 101-9151 to 256-9158. Add 3.0 FTE Fire Engineers to 101-9151. Add 3.0 FTE Fire Captains to 101-9151.
1/1/2025 Capital Projects City Council Eliminate 1.0 FTE Flood General Manager from 652-9040. Flood Division moving from City Manager's Office. 1/1/2025 City Manager's Office City Council Flood Division moving to Capital Projects. 1/15/2025 City Manager's Office City Council
Add 1.0 FTE GIS Supervisor to 104-9034; Add 1.0 FTE Information Technology Specialist I/II to 104-9034. Add 1.0 FTE IT Manager to 104-9034.

Add 1.0 FTE Technical Support Specialist I/II/III to 110-9018. Add 1.0 FTE Information Technology Specialist I/II to 650-9035. Add 1.0 FTE HR & Payroll Technician I/II to 104-9024. Add 1.0 FTE Human Resources Analyst I/II to 104-9024. Change title of Deputy City Manager/Director of Innovation & Technology to Deputy City Manager. Change Deputy City Manager from 0.33 104-9034/0.34 104-9016/ 0.33 110-9018 to 0.33 104- 9026/ 0.33 104-9021/ 0.33 110-9018. Change Assistant City Manager from 0.82 104-9016/ 0.08 106-9020/ 0.1 516-9700 to 0.08 106-9020/ 0.1 516-9700/ 0.2 104-9034/ 0.62 104-9016. Change 1.0 FTE Program Manager/Senior from 104-9021 to 104-9016. 1/15/2025 Finance City Council Add 1.0 FTE Accountant I/II to 104-9051. Add 1.0 FTE Finance Analyst/Senior to 104-9054. Add 1.0 FTE Finance Analyst/Senior to 104-9053. 787
Attachment 3
RESOLUTION 25-13

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO ADOPTING BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/25
WHEREAS, the City Manager’s office is proposing changes to the Authorized Position List (APL) to add new positions and reallocate costs for existing positions; and WHEREAS, the City has experienced significant growth in its workforce over recent years, yet the internal support functions (Human Resources, IT, and Finance) have not scaled proportionately to meet increasing demands; and
WHEREAS, understaffing in these critical support divisions creates operational inefficiencies and delays in critical support services; and WHEREAS, current staffing levels have resulted in extended processing times for recruitment, delayed responses to technical issues, and stretched capacity for financial oversight and reporting; and

WHEREAS, with the recent passage of Measure O and its associated programmatic requirements, further expansion of city services and additional positions across operational departments are anticipated, and this growth will place even greater demands on the internal support divisions; and
WHEREAS, the implementation of Measure O initiatives and the significant increase in capital improvement projects funded by Measure O and anticipated EIFD and IFD bonds will require significant support in terms of personnel management, technological infrastructure, procurement and contracting, and finance administration in general; and WHEREAS, staff proposes the addition of ten (10) new positions within the internal support divisions of Finance, IT, and Human Resources and the reallocation of two existing positions in the City Manager’s office due to a recent retirement; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes have financial impacts totaling $456,547 in FY 2024/25 impacting the Measure E fund – Smart Cities ($34,052), the Community Development Fund ($30,654), and the General Support Services Fund ($391,840) from which costs are allocated to all city funds based on level of service/support provided; and WHEREAS, the impacted funds have sufficient ongoing capacity to fund the proposed changes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all information related to this matter, as presented at the public meetings of the City Council identified herein, including any supporting reports by City staff, and any other information provided during public meetings.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento as follows:

1. The City Council hereby approves the adjustments to the FY 2024/25 budget as provided in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption, unless otherwise noted within the Exhibits to this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento this 15th day of January 2025, by the following vote:
788
Resolution 25-13 FY 2024/25 APL Budget Adjustments

Page 2 ends

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
789
New Positions
Position Title Department Cost Center Object Fund Fund Description FTE Notes FY 2024/25 Budget GIS Supervisor City Manager's Office 104-9034 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 1 NEW POSITION $ 52,711 Information Technology Specialist I/II City Manager's Office 104-9034 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 1 NEW POSITION 45,981 IT Manager City Manager's Office 104-9034 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 1 NEW POSITION 60,343 Technical Support Specialist (Data) City Manager's Office 110-9018 5111 110 Measure E - Smart Cities 1 NEW POSITION 34,052 Information Technology Specialist I/II (GIS) City Manager's Office 650-9035 5111 650 Community Development Fund 1 NEW POSITION 30,654 HR & Payroll Technician I/II City Manager's Office 104-9024 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 1 NEW POSITION 34,052 HR Analyst/Senior City Manager's Office 104-9024 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 1 NEW POSITION 48,434 Accountant I/II Finance 104-9051 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 1 NEW POSITION 44,227 Finance Analyst/Senior (Budget) Finance 104-9054 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 1 NEW POSITION 53,046 Finance Analyst/Senior (Procurement) Finance 104-9053 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 1 NEW POSITION 53,046 10 $ 456,546
Position Reallocations
Position Title Department Cost Center Fund Description FTE Notes FY 2024/25 Budget Deputy City Manager City Manager's Office 104-9026 5111 104 General Support Services Fund -0.34 DELETE $ (27,334) Deputy City Manager City Manager's Office 104-9034 5111 104 General Support Services Fund -0.33 DELETE (26,530) Deputy City Manager City Manager's Office 110-9018 5111 110 Measure E - Smart Cities -0.33 DELETE (26,530) Deputy City Manager City Manager's Office 104-9026 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 0.33 ADD 26,530 Deputy City Manager City Manager's Office 104-9021 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 0.34 ADD 27,334 Deputy City Manager City Manager's Office 110-9018 5111 110 Measure E - Smart Cities 0.33 ADD 26,530 Senior Program Manager City Manager's Office 104-9021 5111 104 General Support Services Fund -1 DELETE (88,382) Senior Program Manager City Manager's Office 104-9016 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 1 ADD 88,382 Assistant City Manager City Manager's Office 104-9016 5111 104 General Support Services Fund -0.82 DELETE (143,379) Assistant City Manager City Manager's Office 106-9020 5111 106 Measure G Fund -0.08 DELETE (15,402) Assistant City Manager City Manager's Office 516-9700 5111 516 Port District -0.1 DELETE (19,252) Assistant City Manager City Manager's Office 106-9020 5111 106 Measure G Fund 0.08 ADD 15,402 Assistant City Manager City Manager's Office 516-9700 5111 516 Port District 0.1 ADD 19,252 Assistant City Manager City Manager's Office 104-9034 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 0.2 ADD 15,772 Assistant City Manager City Manager's Office 104-9016 5111 104 General Support Services Fund 0.62 ADD 127,608 0 0
Fund FTE FY 2024/25 Budget Annual Ongoing
104 General Support Services 8 $ 391,840 $ 1,567,362
110 Measure E - Smart Cities 1 34,052 136,209
650 Community Development 1 30,654 122,616
516 Port District 0 - -
106 Measure G 0 - -
10 $ 456,547 $ 1,826,187

EXHIBIT A
790

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 15, 2025 ITEM #14
SUBJECT:

PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 25-1 REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE MUNICIPAL

CODE TO CREATE THE GRAND GATEWAY ZONING DISTRICT AND RELATED

ACTIONS
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:

Jehiel Budgett, Student Intern
Economic Development & Housing Department
Daniel Berumen, AICP, Senior Planner
Community Development Department
[ ] Commission [X] Staff
[ ] Other
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The item is a public hearing and consideration of first reading of Ordinance 25-1 regarding proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) to create the Grand Gateway Zoning District and related actions to streamline future redevelopment of the Grand Gateway area.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct the public hearing; and

2. Find that the Grand Gateway Zoning District is consistent with the General Plan required for Zoning Amendments; and

3. Find that the Grand Gateway Zoning District project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to §15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines; and

4. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance 25-1 (Attachment 2) amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code regarding creating the Grand Gateway Zoning District and Related Actions.

BACKGROUND
For over a decade, the City has acquired, assembled, remediated, and improved property located at the intersection of Grand Street and Tower Bridge Gateway, known as Grand Gateway. The City has invested significant time and resources towards the transformation of Grand Gateway from former State Route 275 rightof-way and nuisance uses into a mixed-income, mixed-use community in the heart of West Sacramento.

Grand Gateway is uniquely located at the intersection of three planning areas: The Bridge District Specific Plan, Washington District Specific Plan, and West Capitol Avenue/Central Business District Design Guidelines, as shown in Attachment 3. As a result, the Grand Gateway area has been subject to three different design and development standards, complicating future reuse opportunities. In 2013, the City received grant funds from the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District to prepare the Grand Gateway Master Plan to create a standard set of design and use guidelines and implementation actions to facilitate the development of a pedestrian oriented, mixed-use project. Since the City Council approval in June 2013, the Grand Gateway Master Plan has guided the design and construction of multiple grant-funded improvements, including pedestrian, cycling, and transit infrastructure, and 137 affordable housing units (West Gateway Place Phase 1 and 2).

In California, Master Plans often serve as visionary frameworks with no direct legislative authority, while Specific Plans and General Plans are regulatory documents with legal weight, guiding land use and development through enforceable policies and zoning regulations. The Grand Gateway Master Plan has served as an important guiding document for work completed to date. However, more recent City policy and real estate activities warrant additional updates to the Grand Gateway implementation strategy. Such activities include expanding the Grand Gateway area through the acquisitions of the Old Town Inn (located adjacent to Capitol Bowl) and the Rodeway Inn (located at 817 West Capitol Avenue), adopting a comprehensive General Plan update in 2016, including an update to the General Plan Mobility Element in 2024, among other actions. To address these policy and physical changes related to Grand Gateway, the City applied for, and was awarded, State grant funds through the Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) program which provides funding for planning and development activities to accelerate infill housing production.
791
Grand Gateway Zoning District
January 15, 2025

Page 2 ends

Using REAP grant funds, the City executed a contract with urban and environmental planning firm AECOM on June 5, 2024, to provide the City with technical support to create a new zoning district and provide environmental review documents for the Grand Gateway development area. Attachment 4 shows the proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District area. The new zoning district and environmental documentation will enable the City to expedite future Grand Gateway development opportunities, given future redevelopment is consistent with the City’s General Plan and long-envisioned goals for the Grand Gateway project area.

On June 23, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution 23-52 declaring the property as “Exempt Surplus Land” through the State’s Surplus Land Act, with the intention of selling the property to a developer for a mixed-use development with 300 or more units, with 25-percent being affordable to low-income households. After issuing a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Grand Gateway redevelopment in fall 2023, the City selected a development team that proposed developing up to 455 multifamily residential units (including 114 affordable units), ground floor retail space, a hotel, a public plaza and a potential public park in the Grand Gateway area, as depicted in Attachment 5. The City entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (“ENA”) with the development team in July 2024. In the ENA, the City committed to creating the Grand Gateway Zoning District and preparing Tentative and Final Parcels Maps and conducting environmental analyses for the project area. AECOM and City staff have concluded the technical work for the Zoning District and environmental review, as presented in this item. City staff will move forward with the mapping activities in early 2025 and the tentative map will be on a future Planning Commission agenda.

On December 11, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at a special meeting regarding amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code to create the Grand Gateway Zoning District and related actions. There was one public comment in support of the project to proceed. The planning commissioners asked several clarifying questions related to proposed height maximum changes from 65 feet to 90 feet and reduction of common open space of 75 square feet per unit. Staff provided answers to the commissioner’s questions and the public hearing was closed. The Planning Commission decided to vote 5-1 to adopt Resolution 24-9PC (Attachment 1) recommending that the City Council adopt Ordinance 25-1 amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code regarding creating the Grand Gateway Zoning District and Related Actions.

ANALYSIS
The proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District replaces the existing Grand Gateway Overlay Zone reserved as Title 17, Chapter 17.16, as detailed in Attachment 2. The Grand Gateway Zoning District incorporates and refines Land Use Regulations and Development Standards provided in the General Plan land use designation of Central Business District (“CBD”). As demonstrated below, the Grand Gateway Zoning District articulates development standards for allowable uses, types, and densities, among other considerations that are consistent with the General Plan CBD land use designation. A summary of the major Land Use Regulations and Development Standards differences between the proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District and the existing CBD zoning standards, is provided below.

Summary of Changes to CBD Land Use Regulations for Proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District TABLE 17.16.020: LAND USE REGULATIONS – COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES “P” = Permitted Use; “M” = Minor Use Permit required;
“C” = Conditional Use Permit required, “-“ Use not allowed Use Classification Grand Gateway Zoning District Central Business District (Zoning) Residential Uses
Residential Housing Type See subclassifications below
Single-Unit Dwelling, Attached C P(1)/C
Two-Unit Dwelling C P(1)/C
Multi-Unit Residential P P(1)/C
Single-Room Occupancy - C
Family Day Care – Small - P
Public/Semi-Public Uses
Day Care Centers M P
Social Service Facilities M P
792
Grand Gateway Zoning District
January 15, 2025

Page 3 ends

Not allowed as primary use. MUP
required when ancillary to
Residential Uses.

Commercial Uses
Food Preparation - P
Lodging – Hotels P M
Maintenance and Repair Services - P
Nurseries and Garden Center - P
Personal Services See subclassifications below
Fortunetelling - P
Massage Establishments Not allowed as primary use, only as ancillary to a Hotel M
Tattoo or Body Modification
Parlor - P
The proposed changes are centered around targeting uses in line with Master Plan that better reflect the development type and promote a transit-oriented development with high-density living. The new zoning framework will support mixed-use developments, enhancing accessibility and connectivity while fostering a vibrant community atmosphere. This approach not only meets current housing and commercial needs but also positions the area as a sustainable and attractive destination that lines up with a statewide vision for the future.

Summary of Changes to CBD Development Standards for Proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District TABLE 17.16.030: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – COMMERCIAL AND MIXED-USE ZONES Use Classification Grand Gateway Zoning District Central Business District (Zoning) Density
Density (units/acre)
Minimum 30 20
Building Form and Location
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) (gross)
Minimum 0.75 0.3
Maximum 3.0 3.0
Minimum Setbacks (feet)
Front 0 0
Side 0 0
Rear 0 10
Alley 0 0
Open Space
Minimum Open Space
(square feet per residential unit)
75 (≥50% Common)
150
(≥75%)
Building Form and Location
Maximum Height (feet) 90 65
These proposed changes will ensure that future Grand Gateway development will be consistent with the City’s vision of producing a higher density, mixed-use development. The changes being addressed include increasing the minimum density of units/acre, the minimum floor area ratio and allowing a higher maximum building height.

This adjustment will serve to increase the capacity for the community regarding both housing and retail. This will not exceed the limits outlined in the General Plan, but does serve to maximize the potential for development density. Additionally, a higher maximum building height will create development efficiencies to support bringing more housing to the area, while enabling the City and Grand Gateway development team to incorporate 793 Grand Gateway Zoning District
January 15, 2025

Page 4 ends

meaningful public spaces in the Grand Gateway area. These proposed changes are centered around the goal of creating a transit-oriented, high-density development that will serve as a community attraction.

The last recommended action related to the proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District is to remove APNs 008- 150-033, 008-150-066, 008-150-067, 067-330-017, 067-330-031, and 067-330-002 from the Washington Specific Plan area to avoid conflicting development standards. In turn, these parcels would be rezoned to the proposed new Grand Gateway Zoning District designation. The Washington Specific Plan update is nearing the public review phase, and the removal of the aforementioned properties would occur at the time that the full Specific Plan update is considered.

General Plan Consistency
In accordance with Section 17.44.080 of the Municipal Code and State land use law, zoning code amendments must be consistent with the General Plan. The proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District aims to be consistent with Goal LU-5 of General Plan 2035. Goal LU-5 promotes the development of unique higher-density and intensity of mixed-use district and corridors that provide civic and cultural activities; include a range of residential, retail, and employment uses; and serve as both visitor destinations and places of commerce. The Grand Gateway Zoning District also meets several land use policies specifically associated with the Central Business District (CBD) Land Use Designation including, but not limited to, LU-5.8 (City Center – encourage the development of compatible and complementary uses residential, retail, and employment uses), LU-5.9 (Connected CBD – enhance linkages between the CBD and Sacramento River and increase street and pedestrian connectivity with surrounding neighborhoods and district), and LU 5.10 (Visually Upgrade CBD – continue to take the lead in upgrading the visual quality of the streets in the CBD and strive to minimize the visual impact of automobiles in all new developments in the CBD).

Environmental Considerations
This project is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to §15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning) which allows for a streamlined environmental review process for projects that are consistent with the existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. The proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. There are no project specific effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. There are no project specific impacts which the General Plan 2035 Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) failed to analyze as significant effects. There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts which the General Plan EIR failed to evaluate. There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the General Plan EIR. See Attachments 6 and 7 for details.

Commission Recommendations
On December 11, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at a special meeting regarding amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code to create the Grand Gateway Zoning District and related actions. The Planning Commission decided to vote 5-1 to adopt Resolution 24-9PC recommending that the City Council adopt Ordinance 25-1 amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code regarding creating the Grand Gateway Zoning District and Related Actions.

Strategic Plan Integration
Grand Gateway Development is included as part of multiple City Council Strategic Plan Management Agenda items, including recently in 2023 and 2024. The recommended action will further the City Council’s goal by improving development certainty and simplifying development processes for future Grand Gateway Development.

Additionally, the recommended actions will support staff’s efforts to pursue additional State grant funding to fund light rail/streetcar improvements and the Grand Gateway affordable housing development. Streetcar/light rail related activities have been on the City Council Strategic Plan Management Agenda for consecutive years since 2006.

Alternatives
The City Council’s primary alternatives are summarized below.

1. Adopt Ordinance 25-1 amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code; or

2. Deny adoption of Ordinance 25-1 at this time; and/or

3. Continue the item to a future date and request additional information be provided at that time. 794
Grand Gateway Zoning District
January 15, 2025

Page 5 ends

Staff recommends alternative #1. Alternatives 2 and 3 are not recommended as implementation of the Grand Gateway Master Plan has been contemplated for several years. The selected development team and the City need to complete negotiations and adopting the recommended actions will help to advance this important project.

Coordination and Review
This report was developed by the Economic Development & Housing Department and the Community Development Department in coordination with the City Attorney.

Budget/Cost Impact
There are no budget impacts associated with the recommended actions. Costs associated with the preparation of the proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District and associated environmental analysis were funded by State grant funds.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution 24-9PC

2. Ordinance 25-1

3. Grand Gateway Area Map (as reflected in 2013)

4. Grand Gateway Zoning District Area Map

5. Grand Gateway ENA Development Concept

6. 15183 CEQA Checklist

7. Yolo HCP Reporting Form

8. Notice of Exemption (NOE)
795
RESOLUTION 24-9PC

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO APPROVING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE MUNICIPAL

CODE TO CREATE THE GRAND GATEWAY ZONING DISTRICT AND RELATED ACTIONS WHEREAS, the City of West Sacramento desires to promote and protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare; to provide a plan for sound and orderly development, and to ensure social and economic stability through adoption of a Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2013, the City of West Sacramento Council adopted Resolution 13-6 approving the Grand Gateway Master Plan to guide infill, transit-oriented development standards for publicly owned properties located at the convergence of multiple planning areas; and
WHEREAS, the City of West Sacramento has implemented the Grand Gateway Master Plan through the completion of pedestrian, cycling, and transit improvements and disposition of City-owned properties located on Delta Lane for the development of the West Gateway Place affordable housing projects; and
WHEREAS, the City of West Sacramento expanded the Grand Gateway development opportunity area through the acquisitions of 817 and 826 West Capitol Avenue; and WHEREAS, since 2016, the City of West Sacramento has adopted a comprehensive update to the General Plan and related planning documents; and WHEREAS, the Central Business District (CBD) Land Use Designation is incorporated in the 2035 General Plan and aims to provide for development of an urban civic and cultural core, including civic uses such as a city hall and public library, as well as restaurants, retail, service, professional offices, multi-family residential, and similar and compatible uses; and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2023, the City of West Sacramento declared the remaining Grand Gateway development opportunity parcels located at 811-826 West Capitol Avenue as exempt surplus land under the California Surplus Lands Act (Cal.Gov. Code§§ 54220 et seq.); and
WHEREAS, in 2021, the City of West Sacramento was awarded a State Housing and Community Development grant from the Regional Early Action Planning program to further streamline the entitlement process resulting in increased housing supply and affordability in the Grand Gateway development opportunity area; and
WHEREAS, on June 5, 2024, the City of West Sacramento contracted AECOM Technical Services, Inc. to create a zoning district and provide environmental technical support to facilitate the entitlement and environmental review process for the Grand Gateway development opportunity area.

WHEREAS, the Grand Gateway Zoning District is predominantly consistent with Central Business District (CBD) Land Use Designation as it promotes land uses aligned with transitoriented development with high-density living and the framework for mixed-use developments, enhancing accessibility and connectivity while fostering a vibrant community atmosphere; and Docusign Envelope ID: 70958C1F-C3C4-4C38-B1B6-3AC8501A956A 796
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following action:

1. Find that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) review pursuant to the §15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines; and

2. Find that the Grand Gateway Zoning District is consistent with the General Plan required for Zoning Amendments according to the findings provided in Exhibit A; and

3. That the City Council adopt the proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Municipal Code creating the Grand Gateway Zoning District as recommended by the Planning commission.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of December, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES: Squires, Linker, Olivarez, Delgado, Wong
NOES: Andersen
ABSENT: Jackson, Sablan
ABSTAIN:
___________
Matthew Delgado, Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:

Seamus Laffey, AICP, Secretary
Docusign Envelope ID: 70958C1F-C3C4-4C38-B1B6-3AC8501A956A 797
Exhibit A
General Plan Consistency Required for Zoning Amendments §17.44.080 The Planning Commission shall not recommend, and the City Council shall not approve a Zoning Amendment unless the proposed amendment is found to be consistent with the General Plan.

Consistency Findings: The proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District is found to be consistent with Goal LU-5 of General Plan 2035. Goal LU-5 promotes the development of unique higherdensity and intensity of mixed-use district and corridors that provide civic and cultural activities; include a range of residential, retail, and employment uses; and serve as both visitor destinations and places of commerce. The Grand Gateway Zoning District also meets several land use policies specifically associated with the Central Business District (CBD) Land Use Designation including, but not limited to, LU-5.8 (City Center – continue to encourage civic, educational, and other public uses to locate within the CBD to expand the role of the CBD as the government can civic center of the city and encourage the development of compatible and complementary uses residential, retail, and employment uses), LU-5.9 (Connected CBD – enhance linkages between the CBD and Sacramento River and increase street and pedestrian connectivity with surrounding neighborhoods and district), and LU 5.10 (Visually Upgrade CBD – continue to take the lead in upgrading the visual quality of the streets in the CBD and strive to minimize the visual impact of automobiles in all new developments in the CBD).

Docusign Envelope ID: 70958C1F-C3C4-4C38-B1B6-3AC8501A956A 798
ORDINANCE 25-1

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE WEST SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL CODE TO CREATE

THE GRAND GATEWAY ZONING DISTRICT AND RELATED ACTIONS
The City Council of the City of West Sacramento does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Purpose and Authority. The purpose of this Ordinance is to make amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) including the following: This item is a public hearing regarding proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Municpal Code. The proposed amendments replaces the existing Grand Gateway Overlay Zone reserved as Chapter 17.16 with the provisions proposed for the Grand Gateway Zoning District.

Section 2. General Plan Consistency. The City Council finds that the Grand Gateway Zoning District is consistent with the General Plan Central Business District (CBD) Land Use Designation as it promotes the development of unique higher-density and intensity of a mixeduse district and corridor that provides civic and cultural activities; include a range of residential, retail, and employment uses.

Section 3. Amends. The following sections of the West Sacramento Municipal Code are hereby deleted from the Municipal Code:

Chapter 17.16 Grand Gateway Overlay Zone

17.16.010 Purpose
The purpose of this Chapter is to identify the applicability of the West Sacramento Grand Gateway Master Plan.

17.16.020 Applicability
The West Sacramento Grand Gateway Master Planning Document applies to all use and development of properties within the boundaries of the Grand Gateway Master Planning Area.

17.16.030 West Sacramento Grand Gateway Master Plan
All development within the GG Overlay Zone shall be consistent with the goals, objectives, and design requirements of the West Sacramento Grand Gateway Master Plan.

Chapter 17.16 is hereby amended to read:

Chapter 17.16 Grand Gateway Zone

17.16.010 Purpose and Applicability
The GG Zone is intended to provide areas for mixed-use development that creates a prominent gateway to West Sacramento’s downtown and civic center areas, and a complementary transition to the urban development in neighboring districts. This Zone allows both high-density residential and complementary commercial such as retail, commercial services, and hospitality, though the emphasis in this district is on multi-unit housing. This Zone implements the Central Business District General Plan Land Use Designation.
799
Ordinance 25-1

Page 2 ends

17.16.020 Land Use Regulations
Table 17.09.020, Land Use Regulations – Grand Gateway Zone, sets the land use regulations for the Grand Gateway Zone. Land uses are defined in Chapter 17.50, Use Classifications. In cases where a specific land use or activity is not defined, the Director shall assign the land use or activity to a classification that is substantially similar in character. Land uses not listed in the table and not substantially like the uses below may be allowed pursuant to Conditional Use Permit approval. Section numbers in the right-hand column refer to other sections of the Title that provide additional standards.

TABLE 17.16.020: LAND USE REGULATIONS – GRAND GATEWAY ZONE “P” = Permitted Use; “M” = Minor Use Permit required;
“C” = Conditional Use Permit required; “–” Use not allowed.

Use Classification GG Additional Regulations
Residential Uses
Residential Housing Type See subclassifications below
Single-Unit Dwelling, Attached C
Single-Unit Dwelling, Detached –
Two-Unit Dwelling C
Multi-Unit Residential P
Accessory Dwelling Units P See §17.30.040,
Accessory Dwelling Units
Family Day Care See subclassifications below
Small –
Large M
Residential Facility, Assisted Living C
Single-Room Occupancy – See §17.30.200,
Single-Room Occupancy
Supportive Housing
Transitional Housing
Transitional and supportive housing constitute
a residential use and are subject only to those
restrictions that apply to other residential uses
of the same type in the same zone.

Public/Semi-Public Uses
Campground –
Colleges and Trade Schools P
Community Assembly P
Cultural Institutions P
Day Care Centers M
Government Offices P
Hospitals and Clinics See subclassifications below
Clinic C
Hospitals C
Skilled Nursing Facility –
Instructional Services P
Park and Recreation Facilities P
Parking Lots and Structures C
Schools (TK-12) C
Social Service Facilities –
M
Not allowed as primary
use.

MUP required when
ancillary to housing.

Tutoring Facilities P
Commercial Uses
800
Ordinance 25-1

Page 3 ends

TABLE 17.16.020: LAND USE REGULATIONS – GRAND GATEWAY ZONE “P” = Permitted Use; “M” = Minor Use Permit required;
“C” = Conditional Use Permit required; “–” Use not allowed.

Use Classification GG Additional Regulations
Adult Entertainment – See §17.30.050,
Adult Entertainment Uses
Animal Care, Sales, and Services See subclassifications below Animal Sales and Grooming P
Veterinary Services P
Automobile/Vehicle Sales and Services See subclassifications below Automobile Rentals –
Automobile Repair, Major –
Automobile Repair, Minor –
Automobile/Vehicle Sales and Leasing –
Fueling Stations –
Large Vehicle and Equipment Sales,
Services and Rental
–
Towing and Impound –
Washing –
See §17.30.070,
Automobile/Vehicle Sales
and Services
Banks and Financial Institutions P
Business Services P
Commercial Entertainment and Recreation See subclassifications below Cinema/Theaters P
Indoor Sports and Recreation P
Outdoor Entertainment –
Outdoor Sports and Recreation –
Drive-Through Facility – See §17.30.090, DriveThrough Facility Eating and Drinking Establishments See subclassifications below Bars/Night Clubs/Lounges M
Restaurants P
See §17.30.160,
Outdoor Dining and
Seating
Farmer’s Markets P See §17.30.110,
Farmer’s Markets
Food Preparation –
Funeral Parlors and Interment Services –
Hotels P
Maintenance and Repair Services –
Mobile Vendor See §17.30.140, Mobile Vending
Nurseries and Garden Center –
Offices See subclassifications below
Business, Professional, and Technology P
Medical and Dental P
Personal Services See subclassifications below
General Personal Services P
Fortunetelling –
Massage Establishments – Not allowed as
primary use. P as
ancillary to Hotel
Tattoo or Body Modification Parlor –
See §17.30.170,
Personal Services
Retail Sales See subclassifications below
Building Materials Sales and Services -
801
Ordinance 25-1

Page 4 ends

TABLE 17.16.020: LAND USE REGULATIONS – GRAND GATEWAY ZONE “P” = Permitted Use; “M” = Minor Use Permit required;
“C” = Conditional Use Permit required; “–” Use not allowed.

Use Classification GG Additional Regulations
Convenience Markets P
Liquor Sales – Primary use C
Liquor Sales – Accessory use
(building less than 10,000 square feet)
C
Liquor Sales – Accessory use
(building more than 10,000 square feet)
P
Food and Beverage Sales P
General Retail P
Secondhand Store –
Industrial Uses
Custom and Artisan Manufacturing M
Food/Beverage Manufacturing, Small-scale M
Transportation, Communication, and Utility Uses
Airports and Heliports –
Communication Facilities See §17.30.240, Wireless Telecommunication Facilities
Docking Facilities –
Light Fleet-Based Services –
Marinas –
Recycling Facilities – See §17.30.190,
Recycling Facilities
Agricultural and Extractive Uses
Urban Agriculture See subclassifications below
Community Garden P
Market Garden (less than 1 acre) P
Market Garden (1 acre or more) C
Private Garden P
See §17.30.230,
Urban Agriculture
Other Uses
Accessory Uses and Structures See §17.30.030, Accessory Uses, and §17.22.020, Accessory Buildings and
Structures
Home Occupations See §17.30.120, Home Occupations
Nonconforming Use See §17.26, Nonconforming Uses, Structures, and Lots
Outdoor Dining and Seating See §17.30.160, Outdoor Dining and Seating Outdoor Display and Sales See §17.30.150, Outdoor Display and Sales Recharging Stations See §17.30.180, Recharging Stations Solar Energy Systems See §17.30.210, Solar Energy Systems Temporary Uses See §17.30.220, Temporary Uses
Interim Uses See §17.38, Interim Uses

17.16.030 Development Standards
Table 17.16.030 – Development Standards – Grand Gateway Zone, prescribes the development standards for the Grand Gateway Zone. Additional regulations are denoted in the right-hand column. Section numbers in this table refer to other sections of this Title that provide additional standards.
802
Ordinance 25-1

Page 5 ends

TABLE 17.16.030: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – GRAND GATEWAY ZONE General Plan Designation CBD
Density
Density (units/acre) (gross)
Minimum 30 (A)
Maximum 60 (A)
Building Form and Location
Maximum Building Height 90 feet, as
measured vertically
from the finished
grade to the plane
of the highest point
at the top of the
roof
Height limit does not
apply to mechanical
equipment, enclosed
space related to
recreational use of the
roof area, screening,
ornamental or symbolic
features, lattices or
sunshades or landscaping
associated with
recreational use of the
roof area, flag poles, or
similar features – with all
of the exempted features
limited to no more than 10
feet in height.

Floor Area Ratio (FAR) (gross)
Minimum 0.75 For reference, see also
California Public
Resources Code Section
21094.5.

Maximum 3.0 Maximum FAR calculation
does not include square
footage of parking
structures.

Minimum Setbacks (feet)
Front 0 (B)
Side 0 (B)
Rear 0
Alley 0
See §17.22.050,
Encroachments into
Required Setbacks
Open Space
Minimum Open Space
(square feet per residential unit)
75 (>50% Common)
See §17.22.090,
Open Space
(A) Density. Residential development that is part of a mixed-use building or project shall comply with the allowed floor area ratio (FAR) range and is not subject to the allowed density (units/acre) range. Standalone residential development shall comply with the allowed density (units/acre) range.

1. Projects involving multiple parcels. Projects involving multiple parcels may exceed the maximum FAR for individual parcels so long as none of the individual parcels would be below the minimum FAR and so long as the total project FAR does not exceed the maximum FAR.
803
Ordinance 25-1

Page 6 ends

(B) Building Location. The following building location requirements shall apply:

1. Maximum Setback. Buildings directly adjacent to a public street right-of-way shall be placed within 75 feet of the edge of the public street right-of-way.

2. Residential Units. Ground floor residential units shall have street-adjacent setbacks of a minimum of 5 feet.

3. Frontage Improvements. The area between buildings and property lines adjacent to public streets shall be improved as part of a wider sidewalk, as outdoor dining/seating area, plaza, pedestrian amenities, or with maintained landscaping. (C) Limitations on Location of Parking. Off-street parking spaces, if provided, shall be located primarily at the rear of the property, to the side of buildings, interior to buildings, or in structures; no more than 10 percent of surface parking provided shall be constructed within 75 feet of the property line for property lines that are adjacent to a public street right-of-way.

17.09.040 Supplemental Regulations
(A) Building Transparency/Required Openings. Exterior walls facing a public street right-ofway shall include windows, doors, or other openings for at least 50 percent of the building wall area located between two and one-half and seven feet above the level of the sidewalk.

Such walls may run in a continuous plane for no more than 30 feet without an opening.

1. Design of Openings. Openings fulfilling this requirement shall have transparent glazing and provide views into work areas, display areas, sales areas, lobbies, or similar active spaces, or into window displays that are at least three feet deep.

2. Exceptions for Parking Garages. Multi-level garages are not required to meet the Building Transparency/Required Openings requirement.

3. Modifications for Residential Units and Hotels. Ground floor residential units and hotels shall have a reduced Building Transparency/Required Openings requirement – at least 30 percent of the building wall area located between the floor and ceiling of the first habitable story shall include windows, doors, or other openings. Walls may run in a continuous plane for no more than 10 feet without an opening.

4. Reductions. The building transparency requirement may be reduced or waived by the Community Development Director or Designee upon finding that:
a. The proposed use has unique operational characteristics with which providing the required windows and opens is incompatible, and
b. Street-facing building walls will exhibit architectural relief and detail and will be enhanced with landscaping in such a way as to create visual interest at the pedestrian level.

Figure 17.16.040.A: Building Transparency/Required Openings (existing Figure 17.09.040.A)
804
Ordinance 25-1

Page 7 ends

(B) Façade Articulation. Street-facing façades over 50 feet in width shall incorporate at least two of the following features:

1. Windows are recessed by at least four inches from surrounding exterior wall surfaces, as measured from window frame to finished exterior wall.

2. A minimum of 25 percent of the façade, including all building levels, is offset at a depth of at least two feet from the remainder of the façade.

3. The façade includes at least one projection or recess of at least four feet in depth, or two projections or recesses at least two feet in depth at an interval of no more than 50 horizontal feet. For a building with two or more stories, the projection or recess must be present on at least two stories.

4. A vertical feature such as a pilaster is provided of at least 12 inches in both width and depth that extends the full height of the façade at an interval of no more than 50 feet horizontal feet.

5. For buildings of at least three stories, the ground level of the building is distinguished from upper levels by a change in building material that is distinct from the remainder of the façade, along with a change in plane of at least one inch in depth at the transition between the materials.

6. For buildings of at least three stories, the top floor of the building is distinguished from lower levels by a change in façade materials, along with a change in plane at least one inch in depth at the transition between the two materials.

7. The façade includes a horizontal design feature such as a water table, belt course, or bellyband, applied to the transition between the ground floor and upper floors. (C) Façade length. Street-facing façades shall not exceed 150 feet in length before a minimum façade break of at least 8 feet in width and at least 4 feet in depth, open to the sky. (D) Windows. Buildings shall be designed and oriented to minimize the visual intrusion into adjoining residential properties. Window, balcony, and deck locations shall be directed away from window areas of adjoining residences (on-site or off-site). (E) Building Entrances. The primary building entrance shall face a public sidewalk.

1. Elevation. Entrances shall be at or within one vertical foot of the sidewalk elevation for all non-residential and residential common spaces. Ground floor residential uses with individual entrances to the dwelling units from a sidewalk (i.e. without a common entrance) shall either (1) be elevated a minimum of three feet above sidewalk elevation or (2) shall have the entrance set back from the edge of the sidewalk by at least six feet with a planting strip abutting the sidewalk of at least three feet in width and two feet in depth.

2. Corners. Entrances located at corners shall have a distinct architectural treatment to animate the intersection and facilitate pedestrian flow around the corner. Different treatments may include angled or rounded corners, arches, and other architectural elements.

3. Connections. All building and dwelling units located in the interior of a site shall have entrances from a pedestrian walkway that is designed as an extension of the public sidewalk and connect to a public sidewalk.
805
Ordinance 25-1

Page 8 ends

Figure 17.16.040.D: Building Entrances
(existing Figure 17.09.040.D)
(F) Ground Floor Dimensions. Buildings shall meet the following dimensions for ground floor frontages depending on use.

1. Non-residential and residential common spaces. Ground floor spaces shall have a minimum height of 15 feet, measured floor-to-floor, and a minimum depth of 35 feet, measured wall-to-wall.

2. Residential units. Ground floor units shall have a minimum height 10 feet, measured floor-to-floor.
(G) Exterior Building Materials and Colors. A unified palette of quality materials shall be used on all sides of buildings.

1. Allowed Materials. Exterior building materials shall be stone, brick, stucco, concrete block, painted wood clapboard, painted metal clapboard, fiber cement siding, or other quality, durable materials approved by the Community Development Director or Designee. Stucco, when used, shall cover no more than 50 percent of the front façade of the ground floor.
(H) Pedestrian Access. On-site pedestrian circulation and access shall be provided according to the following standards.

1. Internal Connections. A system of pedestrian walkways shall connect all buildings on a site to each other, to on-site automobile and bicycle parking areas, and to any on-site open space areas or amenities.

2. To Circulation Network. Regular connections between onsite walkways and the public sidewalk and other pedestrian routes or trails shall be provided. On-site walkways shall connect the primary building entry or entries to a public sidewalk on each street frontage.

3. Pedestrian Walkway Design. Walkways shall be a minimum of six feet wide, shall be hard-surfaced, and paved with concrete, stone, tile, brick, or comparable material. a. Where a required walkway is parallel and adjacent to a vehicular travel lane, it shall be raised or separated from the vehicular travel lane by a raised crosswalk, a different paving material, or similar method.
b. Where a required walkway is parallel and adjacent to a vehicular travel lane, it shall be raised or separated from the vehicular travel lane by a raised curb at least four inches high, bollards, or other physical barrier.
(I) Vehicle Access.

1. Frontage. Driveways shall not be located on primary frontages where access from secondary frontages is possible.
806
Ordinance 25-1

Page 9 ends

2. Location. Driveways shall be located at least 10 feet from primary building entrances and at least 20 feet from an intersection curb return or pedestrian cross walk.

3. Dimensions. Each driveway and curb cut shall be a maximum of two lanes and 20 feet in width, unless the Community Development Director or Designee determines that a width of up to 24 feet is reasonable for visibility or other public safety reasons due to a lack of design alternatives or the presence of special conditions, such as unique site geometry.
(J) Private Open Space. Private Open Space shall have direct access from the associated residential unit.

1. Dimensions. Private Open Space shall have a minimum dimension of 5 feet in each direction and a minimum area of 40 square feet.

2. Setbacks. Private Open Space may be located in a required setback. (K) Common Open Space. Common Open Space shall be accessible to all tenants of a building and as an option may also be open to the general public.

1. Dimensions. Common Open Space shall have a minimum dimension of 15 feet in each direction and a minimum area of 400 square feet.

2. Distribution. A minimum of 50% of the Minimum Open Space shall be Common Open Space.
(L) Metal Storage Containers. Metal storage containers shall not be used as permanent storage; they may be allowed on a temporary basis in connection with a valid building permit.

Section 3. Severability. If any provision of this chapter, or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, the remainder of this chapter, to the extent it can be given effect, or the application of those provisions to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are severable.

Section 4. Effective Date and Publication. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its adoption, and pursuant to Resolution 99-46 was published in summary format prior to adoption, and a summary will be published within 15 days after adoption in a paper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of West Sacramento.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento this 15th day of January, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
807
Ordinance 25-1

Page 10 ends

ATTEST: Approved as to form:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney CODIFY UNCODIFY __________
808
Grand Gateway Master Plan Area
Bridge District Specific Plan
West Capitol Ave. Action Plan
Washington District Specific Plan
Grand Gateway Attachment 3
Master Plan Area (As shown in 2013 Grand Gateway Master Plan) 809
Proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District Area
Grand Gateway
Zoning District Area Attachment 4
810
Grand Gateway ENA
Development Concept Attachment
5 811
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 1-1 CEQA Consistency Analysis
1 INTRODUCTION
The City of West Sacramento (City) is proposing to adopt the Grand Gateway Zoning District (the “proposed project"). This document provides the appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis and findings to support the City’s action on the proposed project.

In 2013, the City adopted the Grand Gateway Master Plan, which included building form standards, standards for civic spaces, standards for transportation facilities, architectural guidelines, parking strategies, different buildout scenarios for future development within the previous Master Plan Area, summaries of public meetings, a detailed description of existing conditions, discussions of different planning and zoning terms and issues, rationale for certain policy and regulatory changes, and other material.

The proposed project would replace the Grand Gateway Master Plan with the Grand Gateway Zoning District, which identifies allowable land uses, development standards, building standards, and standards for access and open space for future development within this Zoning District. The project area would also be removed from the West Capitol Design Guidelines in favor of the new zoning district.

In 2016, the City adopted a comprehensive General Plan update – the “General Plan 2035.” The 2016 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan 2035 included an analysis of projected future development throughout the city, including development anticipated under the Grand Gateway Master Plan. The impacts associated with the types of development proposed at the project site, the proposed zoning and land use designations, the maximum development density, and the locations where project development could occur, were previously analyzed in the 2016 General Plan EIR (ICF International 2016).

In 2023, the City prepared and certified a Supplemental EIR (SEIR) and adopted updates to its General Plan 2035 related to the Mobility Element and the Bridge District Specific Plan (AECOM 2023).

In June of 2024, the City of West Sacramento City Council approved an exclusive negotiating agreement with SKK Developments and UrbanCore, LLC. The nature of the agreement would be to contemplate acquisition and development of approximately 8.6 acres, consisting of seven parcels, within the proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District consistent with a “Development Concept” presented to the City Council. The City has not received a development application and has not deemed complete any development application involving these properties.

Pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City, as the lead agency, intends to use the 2016 General Plan EIR for the General Plan 2035 and the 2023 SEIR as the CEQA documents for the environmental impacts associated with adoption of the proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District. This document also describes how the General Plan 2035 EIR and SEIR can directly be used as the CEQA documentation for a proposed project within the Grand Gateway Zoning District consistent with the “Development Concept” presented to the City Council in June of 2024. The 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 General Plan SEIR are available for review from the City’s website: https://www.cityofwestsacramento.org/government/departments/communitydevelopment/planning-division/general-plan-2035. The General Plan EIR and SEIR may also reviewed in person at the City Planning Department offices, located at 1110 West Capitol Avenue, West Sacramento, CA.

1.1 CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15183
CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows a streamlined environmental review process for projects that are consistent with the densities established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 was developed to assist lead agencies in implementing Public Resources Code Section 21083.3, which is described below.

1.2 PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21083.3
Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 (a) and (b) provide that, where a parcel has been zoned or designated in a community plan to accommodate a particular density of development, or where a development project is consistent with the general plan of a local agency, and an environmental impact report was certified for the zoning or planning action or the general plan, the examination of environmental effects shall be limited to those that:

Attachment 6
812
AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 1-2 City of West Sacramento
“…are peculiar to the parcel or to the project and which were not addressed as significant effects in the prior environmental impact report, or which substantial new information shows will be more significant than described in the prior environmental impact report.” Public Resources Code Section 21083.3(d) further defines that an effect of a project upon the environment shall not be considered peculiar to the parcel or to the project if uniformly applied development policies or standards have been previously adopted, with a finding based upon substantial evidence that the development policies or standards will substantially mitigate the environmental effect when applied to future projects.

1.3 GENERAL PLAN EIR STREAMLINING STRATEGIES
The City’s 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR were designed to support future environmental analysis for projects consistent with the General Plan. The City declared its intent to make use of the exemption set forth in the Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 as a part of the General Plan SEIR (AECOM 2023 page 5-9):
“The City intends to make full use of the streamlining allowed under Public Resources Code 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines 15183. Under this provision, CEQA only applies to issues “peculiar to the site.” Lead agencies can use EIRs for a general plan, community plan, or other type of plan to analyze the impacts of projects that are consistent with the plan, and greatly limit later analysis to site-specific issues. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(f) provides that impacts are not peculiar to the project if uniformly applied development policies or standards substantially mitigate that environmental effect. The mitigating policies and implementation programs of the City of West Sacramento’s General Plan are considered uniformly applied development policies.

Public agencies can use uniformly applied policies or standards to mitigate effects of future projects, precluding the need to analyze these effects, unless new information arises that changes the impact analysis (Public Resources Code Section 21083.3[d]).

Future CEQA documents within the City limits may reference the same mitigating policies and implementation programs, where appropriate, to demonstrate less-than-significant impacts and that later project-level issues are not “peculiar to the parcel” if they have been substantially mitigated by General Plan policies and implementation programs (uniformly applied development policies).”
This document describes in detail how the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR address the impacts associated with a project within the Grand Gateway Zoning District that is consistent with the “Development Concept” presented to the City Council in June of 2024, and how the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR could be directly used as the CEQA documentation for such a future project. 813
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 2-3 CEQA Consistency Analysis
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 GRAND GATEWAY MASTER PLAN
The Grand Gateway Master Plan (Opticos Design, Inc. 2013) was adopted by the City in 2013 with the intent of guiding infill development within this part of West Sacramento. The City and its former Redevelopment Agency began assembling the properties in the Master Plan area in the early 1990s. In 2008, the adjacent west phase of the Tower Gateway Improvement Project was completed. The Master Plan included a set of standards and guidelines for future development with the intent of developing the area in a way that promotes pedestrian and bicycle activity, reduces vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and improves air quality.

2.2 GRAND GATEWAY ZONING DISTRICT
The Grand Gateway Zoning District would wholly replace and rescind the Grand Gateway Master Plan and the Grand Gateway overlay zoning. The Grand Gateway Zoning District would also replace the West Capitol Design Guidelines within the Master Plan area. The Grand Gateway Master Plan area included approximately 10 acres of public agency-owned land at the east end of West Capitol Avenue, north of Delta Lane, west of the Union Pacific Railroad, and east of Grand Street.

The proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District revises the former Master Plan area to include two new parcels, as described below.

1. Includes Assessor’s Parcel No. 067-320-007 (1.82 acres) on the west side of Grand Street immediately adjacent to the former southwestern boundary of the Master Plan area. This parcel is currently the site of a former motel (the Rodeway Inn, a 40-room structure constructed in 1975), which is now gated and used as a Homekey Program that provides temporary emergency housing to the City’s homeless population.

2. Includes Assessor’s Parcel No. 008-150-033 (approximately 0.6 acres) consists of vacant land immediately east of the Capitol Bowl (bowling alley) and immediately west of the former northwestern boundary of the Master Plan area along West Capitol Avenue.

The Grand Gateway Zoning District would also be applied to the portion of the former Master Plan area that is south of Tower Bridge Gateway and north of Delta Lane. This approximately 3.5-acre portion of the Master Plan area now includes the West Gateway Place Apartments affordable housing project (constructed in 2017), and Phase 2 of the West Gateway Place Apartments, currently under construction.

2.2.1 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
This CEQA analysis is based on a Development Concept prepared for approximately 8.6 acres of property distributed across four development blocks within a portion of the proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District. This CEQA Consistency Analysis document demonstrates how the potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the Development Concept were addressed in the City’s 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 Supplemental General Plan EIR.

As noted previously, the City Council approved an exclusive negotiating agreement with SKK Developments and UrbanCore, LLC regarding development of a portion of the proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District – an agreement which makes reference to the Development Concept used in the analysis throughout this document.

However, regardless of whether the Development Concept suggested by SKK Developments and Urban Core, LLC is implemented, or whether an application for a different Development Concept from a different applicant was submitted in the future, the purpose of this CEQA document is to examine the potential environmental impacts of development of this part of the Grand Gateway Zoning District. The analysis presented herein could be used to support CEQA review of a different development proposal – particularly one that is similar in scale, layout, and mix of proposed uses to the Development Concept evaluated in this document.

The Development Concept contemplates mixed-use development that would include multi-family residences (including affordable housing), ground-level retail, hotel (hospitality), public park space, and parking. Retail 814
AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 2-4 City of West Sacramento
spaces, public park space, hotel, and public parking would all be accessible to the general public, while the amenities within the market-rate apartment buildings and the affordable housing building serve the residents of each respective residential building.

A conceptual layout showing the potential Development Concept is shown in Exhibit 2-1, and a description of the uses within each Development Concept block (abbreviated as “DB”) is provided in Table 2-1.

Source: C2K Architecture 2024
Exhibit 2-1: Grand Gateway Zoning District Development Concept Implementation of a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would require the City to relocate people in the temporary housing associated with the Homekey Program from the current Rodeway Inn building (DB2) to another facility. The City has a commitment to maintain operations of the Homekey Program at the former Rodeway Inn site until end of 2025. The City has recently acquired two additional motel sites along West Capitol Avenue which will be used to initially expand the City's homeless emergency housing options and will also be used to transition program participants from the Homekey Program site as this program winds down.
815
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 2-5 CEQA Consistency Analysis
Table 2-1. Grand Gateway Zoning District Development Concept Development
Block (DB) Acres Description
Housing
(Square
Feet)
Housing
(Units)
Hotel
(Rooms)
Hotel
(Square
Feet)
Retail
(Square
Feet)
Parking
(Spaces)
DB1 2.84
One mixed-use apartment
and retail building. Marketrate apartment housing
units with indoor and
outdoor amenity spaces
for residents, ground-level
retail, and surface parking
spaces. A public plaza
fronts the southwestern
edge of DB1, and a public
park in the southeastern
corner of DB1.
125,000 142 14,000 76 (surface
parking)
DB2 1.82
One affordable housing
apartment building.

Affordable housing units
with indoor and outdoor
amenity spaces for
residents, and surface
parking. The existing 40-
room motel structure
would be demolished.
(square footage includes
housing and amenity
space)
140,000 114 0 50 (surface
parking)
DB3 2.87
One mixed-use apartment
and retail building. Marketrate apartment housing
with indoor amenity
spaces for the residents,
ground-level retail, and a
parking garage with
rooftop amenity spaces for
residents. The garage
provides parking spaces
for the entire four-block
development.
223,000 199 16,135
451 (in a
250,000-
square-foot
parking
garage)
DB4 1.07
One hotel building with
surface parking spaces.

The existing 75-space
surface parking lot would
be removed.
110-140 85,000 0 25 (surface
parking)
Totals 8.60 Four buildings plus
parking garage 488,000 455 110-140 85,000 30,135 602
Source: C2K Architecture 2024
816
AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 2-6 City of West Sacramento

2.2.2 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT – CONSTRUCTION ASSUMPTIONS
For the purposes of this CEQA Consistency Analysis, it is assumed that construction of the Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District could begin in the summer of 2029 could take 3 to 4 years. It is assumed that the first phase of market-rate housing and retail could open in 2031. The affordable housing component could be available before July 2029 with successful bond allocation and tax credits – opening could occur within approximately two years of the award of an allocation.

2.2.3 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT – ASSUMED PHASING
The City assumes that the Development Concept would be constructed in phases by development block. The DB3 parking garage is assumed to be phased so that it is open and available to provide parking for all of the adjacent development blocks.

2.3 GENERAL PLAN 2035
In 2016, the City adopted a comprehensively revised General Plan. The General Plan 2035 provides policy guidance for the amount, character, and location of urban development, as well as preservation and natural resource conservation, economic development, transportation, safety, public facilities and services, and housing.

The General Plan 2035 addresses development throughout the city through the year 2035, including the Grand Gateway Master Plan area. The 2016 General Plan EIR addresses potential environmental effects attributable to implementation of the General Plan 2035.

The vision expressed in the General Plan includes creation of a vibrant central city, transitioning away from a mix of older commercial and industrial uses to more viable uses, and a renewed emphasis on reclaiming the Sacramento River waterfront. Under the General Plan 2035, the central city continues to be revitalized by actions and developments such as improvements to West Capitol Avenue, City Hall, library, community college, transit center and other community facilities, the Sutter Health baseball stadium (home of the Sacramento River Cats Minor League baseball team), and new, compact mixed-use developments. The riverfront has been and continues to be improved with parks, trails, and other amenities. The City envisions that new and revitalized urban mixed-use districts and corridors would provide new opportunities for compatible and integrated housing, retail, and office uses and enhance the city’s urban structure.

In 2023, the City adopted updates to the Mobility Element of the General Plan 2035 and the Bridge District Specific Plan, which included the following:

Ź Goals, policies, and implementation measures that reflect the City’s commitment to community sustainability.

Specific examples include a vital central business district; compact, mixed-use developments near transit nodes; encouragement of urban infill where practical; revitalization of areas such as Stone Lock, Pioneer Bluff, and Seaway; flood protection; and passive and active recreation opportunities along the Sacramento River.

Ź Reflect the land use pattern and intensity set out in the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) adopted by Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG).

The 2023 General Plan update included amendments to the Circulation Diagram in the Mobility Element to incorporate geometries identified in the Pioneer Bluff and Stone Lock Reuse Master Plan, the Washington Realized Sustainable Community Strategy, and the Bridge District Specific Plan, including changes in functional classification system, including new Collectors, extensions to Collectors, new intersections, and one new Arterial.

Aside from changes to the Circulation Diagram and functional classification system, the 2023 General Plan update included certain text changes to the Mobility Element. These include revisions that reflect the City’s progress instituting changes that were proposed as a part of the original Mobility Element, as well as revisions that reflect an updated vision for transit service, and a renewed focus on strategies to reduce vehicular travel demand (vehicle miles traveled, or “VMT”) and increase the safety, convenience, and practicality of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes for reaching daily destinations. Other proposed text changes affirm the City’s commitment to involve the public in transportation improvements, particularly those that have traditionally been 817
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 2-7 CEQA Consistency Analysis
underserved by transportation services and the city’s disadvantaged communities. Still other changes focus on addressing gaps in pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access, particularly in areas where development patterns are relatively more supportive of these non-vehicular travel modes.

The 2023 plan amendments addressed in the 2023 SEIR also included a change to the planned transportation facilities described in the Bridge District Specific Plan, including Volume 2, Section 2.2, the Regulating Plan, which identifies the backbone circulation infrastructure and functional classifications, as well as the “order” (combined streetscape and building design standards guidance). The proposed amendment included revised exhibits showing typical cross sections to augment the streetscape standards for new roadway segments.

2.3.1 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT

CONCEPT
The Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development projected under the General Plan EIR and SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the General Plan EIR and SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the zoning district. The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the General Plan EIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA Consistency Analysis based on the Development Concept. The impacts, then, associated with a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District were addressed as a part of the General Plan EIR and SEIR.

The City’s General Plan designates the proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District as Central Business District (CBD). The CBD land use designation provides for development of an urban civic and cultural core, including restaurants, retail, service, professional offices, multi-family residential, and similar and compatible uses. The Development Concept is consistent with the land uses identified for the CBD land use designation.

The minimum density allowed within the CBD land use designation is 20 units per acre and the minimum floor area ratio (FAR) is 0.3. The maximum density allowed within the CBD land use designation is 60 units per acre and the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) is 3.0. As established in the General Plan, for mixed-use projects, development is regulated according to FAR and not by the number of units per acre.

For Development Block 1, the FAR included in the Development Concept is 1.12, which is within the range allowed under the General Plan. For Development Block 2, the density included in the Development Concept is 63 units per acre. General Plan land use density standards can be applied District-wide vs. parcel by parcel. For Development Block 3, the FAR included in the Development Concept is 1.91, which is within the range allowed under the General Plan. For Development Block 4, the FAR included in the Development Concept is 1.82, which is within the range allowed under the General Plan. For the Development Concept as a whole, the FAR is 1.61, which is within the range allowed under the General Plan. 818
AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 2-8 City of West Sacramento
This page left intentionally blank

819
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-1 CEQA Consistency Analysis
3 CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL TOPICS NOT DISCUSSED IN DETAIL IN THIS

CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
The Development Concept under the proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District would result in no impacts related to the following topic areas, as described briefly below.

Ź Agriculture and Forestry Resources. The Grand Gateway Zoning District is an urban infill and redevelopment area that consists of previously developed urban land. The zoning district is surrounded on all sides by existing urban development in the city of West Sacramento. There is no Important Farmland, no agricultural zoning or Williamson Act contracts, and no forestland or timberland within or near the zoning district, and thus implementation of a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would not result in conversion of forestland or timberland or Farmland land to a non-agricultural use.

Ź Energy Resources. Construction of a project consistent with the Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would include buildings that would be required to be designed to meet all applicable energy efficiency standards at the time of construction and would be required to comply with the energy performance standards found in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, including the Green Building Code (Part 11 of Title 24) Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Construction activities must be conducted in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, including applicable federal, state, and local laws that are intended to promote efficient utilization of resources. These energy efficiency standards ensure that construction and building energy consumption would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary.

Furthermore, since transportation is the top user of energy in California, reducing vehicular travel demand is the most important strategy for improving energy efficiency. The Development Concept and the Grand Gateway Zoning District are both located in an area where existing vehicle miles traveled (VMT, a measure of vehicular travel demand) are relatively low (see the City’s Mobility Element, Mobility Implementation Measure 14-14). There are no planned renewable energy projects within the Grand Gateway Zoning District. Thus, a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the zoning district would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency including the California Renewable Portfolio Standard, the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 (Senate Bill 350), and the CALGreen Code.

Ź Geology, Soils, and Paleontological Resources. Construction of a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would be required by law to implement the California Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations Title 24), which includes requirements for geotechnical reports related to seismic design parameters (strong seismic ground shaking), liquefaction, and unstable and expansive soil, all of which must be incorporated into the project design and construction. A future project applicant would also be required by law to implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per the State Water Resources Control Board’s Statewide Storm Water General Permit for Construction Activity that would address control of water pollution, including sediment, in runoff during construction. Finally, the zoning district is composed of Holocene-age alluvial and basin deposits (Gutierrez 2011), which are too young to contain unique paleontological resources and therefore are not paleontologically sensitive rock formations. Thus, construction activities associated with future development within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would not encounter or potentially damage or destroy unique paleontological resources. The Grand Gateway Zoning District does not contain any unique geologic features.

Ź Hazards and Hazardous Materials. There is no known hazardous materials site within the Grand Gateway Zoning District (State Water Resources Control Board 2024). There are two remediated and closed sites approximately 130 feet north and south of the zoning district, respectively: the former Experience Motel at 820–824 West Capitol Avenue and the former Roadway Express, Inc. at 800 Delta Lane. The results of soil and groundwater sampling at both sites indicated that contamination did not migrate off-site (GRIBI Associates 2010, Geomatrix 2004); thus, these known off-site hazardous materials sites pose no environmental or human health hazard for a project consistent with the Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District. There is one K–12 school within one-quarter mile of the zoning district: The City of Dharma Realm operates a private elementary and middle school at 1029 West Capitol Avenue, which 820

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-2 City of West Sacramento
is immediately adjacent to DB-2. A project consistent with the Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would not include manufacturing or industrial uses, and would only involve the use, transport, or storage of minor amounts of fuels, oils, paints, and household cleaning products. Compliance with local, state, and federal regulations related to the use, transport, or storage of minor amounts of hazardous materials to reduce the potential for accidental spills is required by law for both construction contractors, future retail operators, and future residents. If there is lead-based paint or asbestos within existing structures to be demolished, as detailed in the 2016 General Plan EIR, occupational safety and health standards exist in federal and state laws to minimize worker safety risks, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is responsible for assuring worker safety in the workplace. OSHA asbestos regulations are contained in 29 CFR. Lead-based paint regulations are described in the Lead-Based Paint Elimination Final Rule (24 CFR 33), governed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District Rule 9.9 (Asbestos) requires Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District consultation and permit issuance prior to commencing demolition or renovation work, in the event that demolition, renovation, or removal of asbestos-containing materials is involved. Therefore, a project consistent with the Development Concept would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, disposal, or risk of accidental release of hazardous materials, and would not result in hazardous emissions or handle acutely hazardous substances or wastes within onequarter mile of a school. Because a project consistent with the Development Concept would result in redevelopment of existing and previously developed sites, there would be no interference with emergency evacuation plans. Finally, there are no public or private airports or airstrips within two miles of the zoning district, and thus an airport safety hazard would not occur.

Ź Mineral Resources. The Grand Gateway Zoning District does not contain any mineral resources (O’Neal and Gius 2018).

Ź Recreation. As required by the City, a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would include on-site recreational amenities for both public, and private (onsite residential) use. Therefore, physical deterioration of off-site recreational facilities as a result of a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the zoning district would not occur. The potential environmental effects of on-site recreational amenities associated with a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the zoning district are included throughout the analysis of all of the topic areas considered in this analysis. Project sponsors will be required to pay park impact fees, provide and develop parkland space, or combination thereof.

Ź Public Services. A project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would be considered a reuse and redevelopment project. The parcels that comprise the zoning district were formerly or are currently developed with urban uses including apartments, a motel, surface parking, and industrial buildings. Redevelopment of the zoning district with a project consistent with the current Development Concept, including new mixed urban uses such as a hotel, apartments, surface parking, and a parking garage would be consistent with the amount of development and population accounted for in the City’s General Plan 2035, and therefore would not substantially increase the need for fire protection, police protection, or school services beyond the General Plan 2035 forecasts. As noted previously, for the Development Concept as a whole, the FAR is 1.61, which is within the range allowed under the General Plan.

Furthermore, the need for new schools based on a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the zoning district would be determined by the Washington Unified District based on California Department of Education School Siting Criteria and separate CEQA analyses performed by the school district, and the project applicants would be required to pay all applicable State-mandated school impact fees as required by Senate Bill 50. Therefore, a project consistent with the Development Concept within the zoning district would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives. Project sponsors will be required to pay applicable impact fees when building permits are issued.
821
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-3 CEQA Consistency Analysis
Ź Wildfire. The Grand Gateway Zoning District is situated within the existing developed urban core of West Sacramento. There are no areas of very high, high, or moderate wildfire hazards within or near the project site (California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 2024).

3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL TOPICS CONSIDERED IN DETAIL
The following checklist examines the potential environmental impacts that may result from implementation of a project consistent with the Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District.

This consistency analysis first provides the impact conclusions as addressed by the General Plan EIR and SEIR.

Then, this evaluation identifies whether there are any impacts that would be peculiar to the parcel that would be beyond those already addressed as a part of the City’s General Plan and EIR. Finally, the analysis describes applicable uniform development policies and standards from the City’s General Plan and EIR and SEIR that should be applied as conditions of approval to a future project, such as the Development Concept.

The checklist indicates whether the proposed project would result in significant impacts that:

1. are peculiar to the project or project site;

2. were not identified as impacts in the 2016 General Plan EIR or 2023 General Plan SEIR; or

3. are more severe as a result of substantial new information that was not known at the time that the General Plan EIR was certified.

Impacts attributable to implementation of a future project consistent with the current Development Concept within the proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District that were addressed by the General Plan EIR and/or SEIR and are not peculiar to the parcel are exempt from further environmental review in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. 822

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-4 City of West Sacramento
This page left intentionally blank

823
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-5 CEQA Consistency Analysis

3.3 AESTHETICS

3.3.1 DISCUSSION
Development within the Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development projected under the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the General Plan EIR and SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the Grand Gateway Zoning District, including development consistent with the Development Concept. The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the General Plan EIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA analysis in terms of a project consistent with the Development Concept within the zoning district. The impacts, then, associated with a project consistent with the Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District were addressed as a part of the General Plan EIR and SEIR, and there are no project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or the site that would result in additional impacts beyond those identified in the General Plan EIR or SEIR.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.3-20 through 3.3-22) and the 2023 SEIR (pages 3.1-2 and 3.1-3) found that impacts to scenic vistas would be significant and unavoidable, but only where such scenic vistas were present.

The proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District is situated in the existing urban core area of the City, and it includes and is surrounded by vacant land (formerly developed but the buildings have been demolished) and developed land including buildings, roadways, and surface parking. A project consistent with the current Development Concept within the zoning district would not be visible from the Tower Bridge or the Sacramento River. There are no scenic vistas and thus there would be no impact.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (page 3.1-23) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.1-3) found there would be no impacts to scenic highways. The proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District is not visible from either a State- or locally designated scenic highway. The closest State-designated highway is State Route 160 south of Freeport (8.5 miles to the south), which is outside West Sacramento’s incorporated limits. The nearest locally designed scenic highways are Old River Road (approximately 2.3 miles to the northwest) and Garden Highway (approximately 1.5 824

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-6 City of West Sacramento
miles to the north). Thus, there would be no impact.
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.1-20 through 3.1-22) found that new development in the city would result in a significant and unavoidable impact related to potential degradation of visual character by reducing the amount of open space that is physically and visually accessible, altering the visual character, and converting agricultural and open space land to developed land uses. The 2016 General Plan EIR found that General Plan policies and zoning code requirements for design review would ensure that degraded existing visual conditions in the city are improved through renovations and blight reduction, and would ensure that new development would be designed in a manner that is aesthetically pleasing and sensitive to adjacent land uses, including the natural and historical context. This objective would be achieved through building, infrastructure, and utility placement and design; the use of landscaping and site amenities; and design review to ensure that design requirements are addressed in proposed designs for renovations, infill, and new development. Nevertheless, the 2016 General Plan EIR found that conversion of existing undeveloped areas to urban development and enhancing density and activity in existing developed areas would change the visual environment. Therefore, the 2016 General Plan EIR found that West Sacramento would transition over time from a city that still retains a large rural visual component to one that is more developed, and although this transition could be viewed favorably by many people, visual character is inherently subjective, and some people – particularly residents in areas near currently undeveloped lands – could perceive such transitions negatively.

The Development Concept would involve redevelopment within the city’s urban core area. All of the parcels that comprise the Grand Gateway Zoning District have been previously developed with buildings and surface parking areas, most of which have since been demolished. Development Block 2 currently contains the former Rodeway Inn, a 40-room motel constructed in 1975, which is now gated and used as a Homekey Program providing temporary emergency housing to the City’s homeless population. The Development Concept would not involve conversion of rural or agricultural land to urban uses, and furthermore it would be subject to uniformly applied development standards through required consistency with the City’s design standards, design review process, and the Grand Gateway Zoning District standards. A project consistent with the Development Concept would result in an improvement in both the visual character and visual quality as compared to existing conditions. The purpose of the proposed Grand Gateway Zoning District is to provide areas for mixed-use development that creates a prominent gateway to West Sacramento’s downtown and civic center areas, and a complementary transition to the urban development in neighboring districts. The Development Concept or other projects within the Grand Gateway Zoning District will be required to be consistent with the Grand Gateway Zoning District development standards, as well as other applicable City standards related to visual resources, aesthetics, and scenic quality.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.1-23 through 3.1-26) found that new development in the City would result in a significant and unavoidable impact related to new substantial sources of light and glare particularly where rural agricultural areas would be converted to urban development, and by increasing the density of development in existing developed areas.

A project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would be subject to uniformly development uniform standards in the form of the 2016 General Plan EIR mitigation measures listed below:

Ź Mitigation Measure AES-3a: Create new Urban Structure and Design Policies to Apply Minimum Lighting Standards and to Reduce Glare. Outdoor lighting limited to safety and security requirements designed using Illuminating Engineering Society’s design guidelines and in compliance with International Dark-Sky Association approved fixtures; use materials in new buildings that reduce glare; windows in mid-rise and high-rise buildings must be designed to reduce glare. 825
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-7 CEQA Consistency Analysis
Ź Mitigation Measure AES-3c: Create New Natural And Cultural Resources Policy to Apply Minimum Lighting Standards. New buildings must use low-intensity interior safety lighting for use after business hours instead of standard interior safety lighting; all non-safety lighting, such as in offices and hallways, must be turned off after business hours; employ the most current light pollution reduction techniques in new building design.

826

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-8 City of West Sacramento
This page left intentionally blank
827
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-9 CEQA Consistency Analysis

3.4 AIR QUALITY

Where available, the significance criteria
established by the applicable air quality
management district or air pollution control district
may be relied upon to make the following
determinations.

Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?

3.4.1 DISCUSSION
The Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development projected under the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the Grand Gateway Zoning District. The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the 2016 General Plan EIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA analysis, consistent with the Development Concept. The impacts, then, associated with a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District were addressed as a part of the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR, and there are no project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or the site that would result in additional impacts beyond those identified in the 2016 General Plan EIR or 2023 SEIR.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.3-15 through 3.3-19) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-3) discussed impacts related to conflicts with or obstruction of the applicable air quality plan. West Sacramento is within the Sacramento Valley Air Basin, which is regulated by the Yolo Sacramento Air Quality Management District (YSAQMD). The development forecasts in the 2016 General Plan and 2023 General Plan Update reflect City policies to promote infill development and pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access – policies that would help to reduce the potential adverse air quality effects from future development included in the General Plan are that are consistent with the strategies of the State Implementation Plan and of the Sacramento Metropolitan Region’s air quality attainment plans.

The 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR found that because the project was a General Plan, the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plans, and the impact was considered less than significant.
828

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-10 City of West Sacramento
A project consistent with the Development Concept would generate air pollutant emissions, but future development within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would be required to implement uniform development standards in the form of applicable YSAQMD rules related to project construction and operation, which are specifically designed to promote consistency with the relevant air quality plans, as well as 2016 General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure AQ-2, which requires construction dust control mitigation consistent with YSAQMD guidance.

Furthermore, a project consistent with the Development Concept would comply with Sacramento Area Council of Governments’ (SACOG) Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), which has air pollutant emissions reduction requirements. The Development Concept would be consistent with MTP/SCS policies including (from Priority Policy Area 1, POLICY 1) Ź Development in communities where services, amenities, and transportation infrastructure already exist; Ź Revitalization of urban…centers and corridors;
Ź Higher density housing options such as… multi-family housing options…; and Ź Complete communities that include a balance of homes, jobs, services, amenities, and diverse transportation options; transit-oriented development including more housing and jobs in high frequency transit areas The Grand Gateway Zoning District is in an area where development generates a low level of vehicle miles traveled per capita (residential population) (General Plan Mobility Element, page 21).

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.3-19 through 3.3-24) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-4 through 3.3-7) discussed impacts related to violation of air quality standards or substantial contributions to air quality violations.

The 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR found that emissions during construction would exceed relevant thresholds, and despite the application of existing YSAQMD rules and Mitigation Measure AQ-2, the impact was considered significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measure AQ-2 requires:

Ź Mitigation Measure AQ-2: Implement construction dust control mitigation measures described in YSAQMD’s CEQA Handbook (language added below from YSAQMD Handbook). • Water all active construction sites at least twice daily. Frequency should be based on the type of operation, soil, and wind exposure.
• Haul trucks shall maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard. • Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, or loose materials. • Apply non-toxic binders (e.g., latex acrylic copolymer) to exposed areas after cut and fill operations and hydroseed area.
• Apply chemical soil stabilizers on inactive construction areas (disturbed lands within construction projects that are unused for at least four consecutive days).
• Plant tree windbreaks on the windward perimeter of construction projects if adjacent to open land. • Plant vegetative ground cover in disturbed areas as soon as possible. • Cover inactive storage piles.
• Sweep streets if visible soil material is carried out from the construction site. 829
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-11 CEQA Consistency Analysis
• Treat accesses to a distance of 100 feet from the paved road with a 6 to 12 inch layer of wood chips or mulch.
• Treat accesses to a distance of 100 feet from the paved road with a 6- inch layer of gravel.

A project consistent with the Development Concept would have the same sources of construction emissions as those that were considered in the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR. The 2023 SEIR explains that, due to increasing fuel efficiency and vehicle regulations, as well as the increase in the greater number of electric vehicles in the fleet, despite development and increases in vehicular travel, mobile source emissions are anticipated to decrease between present and 2040 (2023 SEIR, page 3.3-6) – this was also true for the analysis in the 2016 General Plan EIR (page 3.3-21). Since vehicles are the predominant source of oxides of nitrogen (an ozone precursor), these emissions are anticipated to decrease (even while reactive organic gases, another ozone precursor, are anticipated to increase between present and General Plan buildout).

A project consistent with the Development Concept would be required to implement uniform development standards in the form of YSAQMD rules related to project construction and operation, which are specifically designed to reduce criteria air pollutant emissions. Furthermore, a project consistent with the Development Concept within the zoning district would be subject uniform development standard Mitigation Measure AQ-2 from the 2016 General Plan EIR, which requires projects to implement YSAQMD construction dust and construction equipment exhaust control measures to reduce the amount of dust emissions from construction activities.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (page 3.3-24) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-7) found that the General Plan would have a less-than-significant cumulative contribution to increases of criteria non-attainment pollutants since it is consistent with current air quality attainment plans. The 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR explain that the General Plan’s focus on promoting infill development that encourages pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access, and consistency with the SACOG MTP/SCS is also consistent with air quality attainment planning. A project consistent with the Development Concept would be consistent with policies in the SACOG’s MTP/SCS and the General Plan that would reduce VMT, thereby reducing cumulative criteria pollutant emissions.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.3-24 through 3.3-27) and the 2023 SEIR (pages 3.3-7 and 3.3-8) found that, with implementation of General Plan policies to future projects, there would be a less-than-significant impact related to exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. The Development Concept could expose sensitive receptors to air pollutants during construction, since there are residences in the broader vicinity of the Development Concept site. However, based on the scale and nature of the Development Concept, the City does not anticipate any significant impact related to construction-related pollutant concentrations. The Development Concept does not include any uses that would generate substantial pollutant concentrations during operations, and therefore uniformly applied development standards related to buffering incompatible land uses (e.g., industrial from residential) do not apply.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.3-27 and 3.3-28) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-8) found a less-thansignificant impact related to exposure to odors and noted that General Plan Policy S-5.4 requires an adequate distance between sensitive land uses and facilities or operations that may produce substantial odors:

Ź Policy S-5.4 Sensitive Land Uses. The City shall ensure maintenance of adequate separation between sensitive land uses and facilities or operations that may produce toxic or hazardous air pollutants or substantial odors, consistent with California Air Resources Board recommendations.

A project consistent with the Development Concept could include on-site restaurant facilities that could generate odors. However, on-site restaurants would be subject to uniform development standards in the form of the California Retail Food Code (California Health and Safety Code Division 104, Environmental Health Part 7, Sections 113700–114437), which requires commercial kitchens to have a mechanical exhaust system that removes all grease and odors from the kitchen. A project consistent with the Development Concept would also be subject to uniform development standards in the form of YSAQMD Rule 2.5, which is designed to prevent odor issues by prohibiting discharge of emissions that cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public.

830

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-12 City of West Sacramento
This page left intentionally blank
831
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-13 CEQA Consistency Analysis

3.5 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
Project or
Project Site
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in GP
EIR or SEIR
Not
Applicable No
Impact
Addressed by
the General Plan
EIR, SEIR and/or
Uniform
Development
Policies and
Programs
Biological Resources. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly
or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or specialstatus species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?

3.5.1 DISCUSSION
The Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development projected under the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the Grand Gateway Zoning District. The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the General Plan EIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA analysis in terms of a project consistent with the Development Concept. The impacts, then, associated with a project consistent with the Development Concept were addressed as a part of the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR, and there are no project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or the site that would result in additional impacts beyond those identified in the 2016 General Plan EIR or 2023 SEIR.

Consistent with General Plan Policy NCR-2.4, Habitat Surveys, the City commissioned a biological resources assessment for properties included within the Development Concept. Policy NCR-2.4 requires:
832

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-14 City of West Sacramento
Ź Policy NCR-2.4 Habitat Surveys. The City shall require site-specific surveys for discretionary development proposals that could potentially impact biological resources to determine if any significant wildlife habitat and vegetation resources will be adversely affected and, if so, to identify appropriate measures to avoid or mitigate such impacts. Include protection measures to avoid and minimize the introduction and spread of invasive plants in all habitat mitigation requirements.

The Biological Resources Assessment summarizes the findings of a desktop analysis and biological reconnaissance survey conducted for the Development Concept site. The survey was performed to map land cover types and vegetation, assess habitat conditions for potential to support special-status species and their habitat, assess the presence of sensitive natural communities including wetlands, and evaluate potential impacts on sensitive biological resources that could occur from development of a future project consistent with the Development Concept. In addition to surveying the Development Concept site for special-status species, a 500- foot burrowing owl survey buffer and 0.25-mile nesting Swainson’s hawk survey buffer around the project were established.
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.4-32 through 3.4-37) and 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-1) found that the impact of the loss of special-status plants and wildlife and their habitats would be less than significant and that General Plan policies would minimize, avoid, and compensate for potential direct and indirect effects on special-status species.

As described in the Biological Resources Assessment for the Development Concept site, no special-status plant species were observed in the survey area, nor were special-status plant species found to have any potential to occur. Additionally, the Biological Resources Assessment noted that due to the lack of suitable habitat, the highly disturbed nature of vegetation and landscaping, and the proximity to existing development, it is highly unlikely that special-status wildlife could occur within the Development Concept site.

However, cultivated trees and shrubs within the Development Concept site have the potential to support numerous nesting and migratory birds and a portion of the 0.25-mile nesting Swainson’s hawk buffer has the potential to support nesting and foraging raptors. Additionally, existing buildings and trees within the area may provide winter roosting habitat for the pallid bat.

With respect to nesting birds and nesting habitat, a project consistent with the Development Concept would be subject to uniformly applied development standards in the form of General Plan Policy NCR-2.4, which requires site-specific surveys and appropriate measures to avoid or mitigate such impacts. The City commissioned a biological resources survey and assessment for the Development Concept, partially complying with Policy NCR2.4. General Plan Policy NCR-2.7 requires the City to ensure that development projects do not adversely affect such species or that projects fully mitigate their impact. Implementation Program Natural and Cultural Resources 1 indicates that the City will participate in the Yolo Habitat Conservancy Program. As described throughout this Consistency Analysis and in Appendix A (Yolo Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan Reporting Form), the Development Concept site is developed and as such, would generally not affect sensitive species or habitat. However, there are suitable Swainson’s hawk or white-tailed kite nest trees within 1,320 feet of the Development Concept site, and therefore, if a future project is proposed within the Development Concept site, the City will require HCP Avoidance and Minimization Measures 8 and 16, which require preconstruction surveys at the appropriate times and specified actions to avoid an adverse impact.

Ź AMM 8: Avoid and Minimize Effects of Construction Staging Areas and Temporary Work Areas.

Equipment staging and other temporary work areas will be restricted to the existing project footprint and adjacent rights-of-ways (such as adjacent roadways and bike lanes). No temporary work area will be located in covered species habitat or other sensitive natural communities.

Ź AMM 8: Avoid and Minimize Effects of Construction Staging Areas and Temporary Work Areas. Project proponents should locate construction staging and other temporary work areas for covered activities in areas that will ultimately be a part of the permanent project development footprint. If construction staging and other temporary work areas must be located outside of permanent project footprints, they will be located either in areas that do not support habitat for covered species or are easily restored to prior or improved ecological 833
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-15 CEQA Consistency Analysis
functions (e.g., grassland and agricultural land). Construction staging and other temporary work areas located outside of project footprints will be sited in areas that avoid adverse effects on the following:
• Serpentine, valley oak woodland, alkali prairie, vernal pool complex, valley foothill riparian, and fresh emergent wetland land cover types.
• Occupied western burrowing owl burrows. Occupied for the purpose of AMM8 means at least one burrowing owl has been observed occupying the burrow within the last three years. Occupancy of a burrow may also be indicated by owl sign at the burrow entrance, including molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement at or near a burrow entrance or perch site. • Nest sites for covered bird species and all raptors, including noncovered raptors, during the breeding season.

Ź Project proponents will follow specific AMMs for sensitive natural communities (Section 4.3.3, Sensitive Natural Communities) and covered species (Section 4.3.4, Covered Species) in temporary staging and work areas. For establishment of temporary work areas outside of the project footprint, project proponents will conduct surveys to determine if any of the biological resources listed above are present.

Ź Within one year following removal of land cover, project proponents will restore temporary work and staging areas to a condition equal to or greater than the covered species habitat function of the affected habitat.

Restoration of vegetation in temporary work and staging areas will use clean, native seed mixes approved by the Conservancy that are free of noxious plant species seeds.

Ź AMM 16: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Habitat of Swainson’s Hawk and White-Tailed Kite.

The project proponent has already conducted planning level surveys, identifying the potential for Swainson’s hawk and white-tailed kite to nest within 1,320 feet of the proposed project. As such, a pre-construction survey will be conducted and will follow the requirements outlined in AMM 16 below. If necessary, nest trees will be avoided as described in AMM-16 of the YOLO HCP/NCCP. If trees with active nests cannot be avoided, a biologist shall be present on-site during tree trimming/removal to monitor the bird’s behavior and order that work be stopped if the birds begin to exhibit agitated behavior.

Ź AMM 16: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Habitat of Swainson’s Hawk and White-Tailed Kite.

The project proponent will retain a qualified biologist to conduct planning-level surveys and identify any nesting habitat present within 1,320 feet of the project footprint. Adjacent parcels under different land ownership will be surveyed only if access is granted or if the parcels are visible from authorized areas. • If a construction project cannot avoid potential nest trees (as determined by the qualified biologist) by 1,320 feet, the project proponent will retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys for active nests consistent, with guidelines provided by the Swainson’s Hawk Technical Advisory Committee (2000), between March 15 and August 30, within 15 days prior to the beginning of the construction activity. The results of the survey will be submitted to the Conservancy and CDFW. If active nests are found during preconstruction surveys, a 1,320-foot initial temporary nest disturbance buffer shall be established. If project related activities within the temporary nest disturbance buffer are determined to be necessary during the nesting season, then the qualified biologist will monitor the nest and will, along with the project proponent, consult with CDFW to determine the best course of action necessary to avoid nest abandonment or take of individuals. Work may be allowed only to proceed within the temporary nest disturbance buffer if Swainson’s hawk or white-tailed kite are not exhibiting agitated behavior, such as defensive flights at intruders, getting up from a brooding position, or flying off the nest, and only with the agreement of CDFW and USFWS. The designated on-site biologist/monitor shall be on-site daily while construction-related activities are taking place within the 1,320-foot buffer and shall have the authority to stop work if raptors are exhibiting agitated behavior. Up to 20 Swainson’s hawk nest trees (documented nesting within the last 5 years) may be removed during the permit term, but they must be removed when not occupied by Swainson’s hawks.
834

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-16 City of West Sacramento
• For covered activities that involve pruning or removal of a potential Swainson’s hawk or white-tailed kite nest tree, the project proponent will conduct preconstruction surveys that are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Swainson’s Hawk Technical Advisory Committee (2000). If active nests are found during preconstruction surveys, no tree pruning or removal of the nest tree will occur during the period between March 1 and August 30 within 1,320 feet of an active nest, unless a qualified biologist determines that the young have fledged and the nest is no longer active.

With regard to the potential for existing buildings and trees within the area providing winter roosting habitat for the pallid bat, as noted previously, General Plan Policy NCR-2.7 requires the City to ensure that development projects do not adversely affect such species or that projects fully mitigate their impact. Uniformly Applied Development Standard NCR-2.7a has been developed to implement Policy NCR-2.7 and the City will require adherence to this Standard if a future project is proposed within the Development Concept site:

Ź Uniformly Applied Development Standard NCR-2.7a Conduct pre-demolition surveys for bats and take appropriate action. Conduct a pre-demolition survey for bat species prior to demolition or removal of any structure or tree no more than 48 hours prior to demolition or removal. Conduct the survey at dusk – one hour before dusk and three hours after or other survey period determined by a qualified biologist to adequately determine whether a structure or tree is occupied by bat species to observe any foraging bat exit and entry behavior from roost sites. If bat species are determined to be present, a qualified biologist will oversee appropriate avoidance measures, which may include establishment of buffer zones around occupied sites during the nursery season (May 1 through October 1). During the non-nursery season, roosting bats may be evicted from buildings proposed for demolition under the supervision of a qualified biologist.

Implementation of this Standard would protect any bat species, including the pallid bat, occupying buildings and trees subject to removal.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.4-35 through 3.4-37) and 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-1) found that impacts related to the loss of special-status fish and their habitats would be less than significant and that General Plan policies would minimize, avoid, and compensate for potential direct and indirect effects on special-status fish. As identified in the Biological Resources Assessment, there is a canal ditch along the northern boundary of DB1 and the northeastern boundary of DB4. No other aquatic features or indicators of wetland hydrology were observed in the area during the biological reconnaissance survey and National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) and National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) have no additional aquatic features mapped within the area. As described in the Biological Resources Assessment, the canal ditch does not support suitable habitat for special-status fish due to the highly disturbed nature of the canal ditch and the likelihood of poor water quality due to runoff from adjacent development. Therefore, a project consistent with the Development Concept would not result in the loss of special-status fish or their habitats.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.4-37 through 3.4-40) and 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-1) discussed impacts related to the loss or disturbance of special-status fish and their habitats due to increased diversion of Sacramento River water to meet future demand and the potential for increased discharge of treated wastewater; impacts were found to be less than significant. The City proposes the Grand Gateway Zoning District to implement the General Plan and replace the former Grand Gateway Master Plan in substantially the same area.

Although some of the standards in the Grand Gateway Zoning District would be different from the former Master Plan, the revised Zoning District standards are consistent with the General Plan 2035 and the 2023 General Plan update. Therefore, a project consistent with the Development Concept would not result in increased diversion of Sacramento River water to meet future demand or increased discharge of treated wastewater beyond what was analyzed in the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (page 3.4-40) and 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-1) found that impacts related to the potential for in-water construction projects and maintenance activities to result in the loss or disturbance for special-status fish and their habitats would be less than significant with mitigation. 2016 General Plan Mitigation Measure BIO-6 was implemented to revise General Plan Policy NCR-2.13, which applies to development and in-water construction and maintenance activities that may affect fishery resources in the Sacramento River, Deep Water Ship Channel, and Lake Washington. A project consistent with the Development Concept would not result in development, in-water construction, or maintenance in the Sacramento River, Deep Water Ship Channel, or Lake 835
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-17 CEQA Consistency Analysis
Washington; therefore, 2016 General Plan Mitigation Measure BIO-6 is not applicable. In-water construction projects are described in the 2016 General Plan EIR as bridge, pier, and boat dock construction and include activities such as dredging. A project consistent with the Development Concept would not result in bridge, pier, or boat dock construction; therefore, there would be no impact related to the loss or disturbance for special-status fish and their habitats due to in-water construction projects and maintenance activities. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.4-40 through 3.4-42) and 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-1) found that impacts related to the loss of oak woodland and valley foothill riparian habitat would be less than significant with mitigation. 2016 General Plan Mitigation Measure BIO-7 was implemented to revise General Plan Policy NCR-2.9 to include riparian and associated shaded riverine aquatic (SRA) cover habitat. Due to the highly developed nature of the Development Concept site, there are no oak woodland and valley foothill riparian habitat present at the Development Concept site and Mitigation Measure BIO-7 does not apply. A project consistent with the Development Concept would not have the potential to result in the loss of oak woodland and valley foothill riparian habitat and there would be no impact.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
The 2016 General Plan EIR (page 3.4-42) and 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-1) found that impacts related to the loss of state- and federally protected wetlands and other waters through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means would be less than significant. As described in the Biological Resources Assessment, the only aquatic feature within the Development Concept site is the canal ditch and no other aquatic features or indicators of wetland hydrology were observed during the survey. This portion of the Development Concept site is shown as a part of a park and landscaping adjacent to a Hotel Site. NWI and NHD have no additional aquatic features mapped within the Development Concept site. The canal ditch would not be subject to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jurisdiction under the federal Clean Water Act, as noted in the Biological Resources Assessment. The canal ditch may not meet the definition of waters of the state, which would require confirmation from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. If the canal ditch does qualify as waters of the state, a project consistent with the Development Concept would be subject to uniformly applied development standards in the form of General Plan Policy NCR-2.9, which requires development that would affect waters of the state to avoid adverse effects or compensate for the loss on a no net loss basis according to applicable State regulations.

General Plan Implementation Program Natural and Cultural Resources 1 indicates that the City will participate in the Yolo Habitat Conservancy Program. As described throughout this Consistency Analysis and in Appendix A to this Consistency Analysis (Yolo Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan Reporting Form), the Development Concept site is developed and as such, would generally not affect sensitive species or habitat. However, there is one canal ditch present that could be affected by the Development Concept and that may be subject to California Department of Fish and Wildlife jurisdiction under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code. Therefore, consistent with General Plan Policy NCR-2.9 and HCP Avoidance and Minimization Measure 10, if a project is proposed within the Development Concept site, the City will require that, prior to construction, the project proponent shall consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to determine if a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement is necessary for impacts. If it is, the project proponent will be required to apply for a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement and implement all conditions set forth in the permit. Policy NCR-2.9 and Avoidance and Minimization Measure 10 require:

Ź Policy NCR-2.9 No Net Loss. The City shall require new development to ensure no net loss of riparian habitat and associated shaded riverine aquatic (SRA) cover, State and Federally regulated wetlands, other waters of the United States (including creeks, rivers, ponds, marshes, vernal pools, and other seasonal wetlands), and associated functions and values by regulating development in and near these habitats and promoting projects that avoid sensitive areas. Where habitat loss is unavoidable, the City shall require replacement consistent with State and Federal regulations protecting riparian, SRA cover, and wetland resources. The replacement riparian, SRA cover, or wetland habitat should consist of locally occurring native species.
836

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-18 City of West Sacramento
Ź AMM10: Avoid and Minimize Effects on Wetlands and Waters. Project proponents will comply with stormwater management plans that regulate development as part of compliance with regulations under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. Covered activities that result in any fill of waters or wetlands will also comply with requirements under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, State Water Resources Control Board (State Board), Fish and Game Code Section 1602, and Regional Board regulations. Other than requirements for buffers, minimizing project footprint, and species-specific measures for wetland-dependent covered species, this HCP/NCCP does not include specific best management practices for protecting wetlands and waters because they may conflict with measures required by the USACE, State Board, Regional Board, and CDFW.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.4-42 through 3.4-43) and 2023 SEIR (3.3-1) found that impacts related to interfering with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites would be less than significant. As described above, cultivated trees and shrubs within the proposed Development Concept site have the potential to support numerous migratory birds, but if there is a project proposed within the Development Concept site, as detailed above, the City will require implementation of Avoidance and Minimization Measures 8 and 16 and Uniformly Applied Development Standard NCR-2.7a in order avoid any potential impact. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
The 2016 General Plan EIR (page 3.4-43) and 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-1) discussed impacts related to conflicts with existing local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources and found that implementation of the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts. As noted in the Biological Resources Assessment, there are several native oak tree (Quercus spp.) species within the Development Concept site. A project consistent with the Development Concept would be subject to uniformly applied development standards in the form of required compliance with the City’s Tree Ordinance (Title 8 of the Municipal Code), which requires trees removed as a result of development to be replaced in accordance with the replacement schedule set forth for landmark, heritage and street trees.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The 2016 General Plan EIR (page 3.4-44) and 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-1) found that there would be no impact related to conflicts with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan because no natural community conservation plans had been updated at the time of the 2016 General Plan EIR. The Yolo County Heritage Program, a county-wide multi-species NCCP/HCP, was approved and adopted in 2019. General Plan Policy NCR-2.2 requires cooperation with the Yolo County Natural Heritage Program. The Development Concept site is a previously disturbed infill site that would generally not affect sensitive species or habitat. However, as noted previously, the City will require HCP Avoidance and Minimization Measures 8 and 16, which require preconstruction surveys at the appropriate times and specified actions to avoid any adverse impact.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (page 3.4-44) and 2023 SEIR (page 3.3-1) found that impacts related to invasive plant species would be less than significant with mitigation. Mitigation Measure BIO-12 was implemented to revise General Plan policies NCR-2.4 and NCR-2.14 to include language requiring protection measures to avoid and minimize the introduction and spread of invasive plants in all habitat mitigation requirements. Development activities under a project consistent with the Development Concept could introduce new invasive plants into the area or contribute to the spread of existing invasive plants to uninfested areas outside the Project area. Therefore, a project consistent with the Development Concept would be subject to uniform development standards in the form of protection measures, as required by General Plan Policy NCR-2.4 (referenced previously). For potential proposed publicly accessible open space or recreation areas that may be a part of a future project at the Development Concept site, Policy NCR-2.14 requires:
837
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-19 CEQA Consistency Analysis
Ź Policy NCR-2.14 Public Areas. The City shall ensure that public access and recreation facilities do not eliminate or degrade riparian habitat values. Trails, picnic areas, and other improvements shall be sited to minimize impacts on sensitive wildlife habitat or riparian vegetation. 838

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-20 City of West Sacramento
This page left intentionally blank
839
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-21 CEQA Consistency Analysis

3.6 CULTURAL RESOURCES

3.6.1 DISCUSSION
Development within the Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development projected under the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the General Plan EIR and SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the Grand Gateway Zoning District, including development consistent with the Development Concept. The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the 2016 General Plan EIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA analysis in terms of a project consistent with the Development Concept within the zoning district. The impacts, then, associated with a project consistent with the Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District were addressed as a part of the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR, and there are no project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or the site that would result in additional impacts beyond those identified in the 2016 General Plan EIR or 2023 SEIR.

Consistent with General Plan Natural and Cultural Resources Element Implementation Program 24, the City commissioned a cultural resources assessment for the Development Concept site. As part of the Cultural Resources Assessment, a pre-field record search of the California Historical Resources Information System at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) was conducted to identify previous cultural resources reports or studies completed within a one-quarter-mile radius of the Development Concept site. Pre-field literature review included a review of historic-era maps and aerial photographs; historic newspapers; online local history collections; property records; and other books and documents. Additionally, a pedestrian survey of the area was conducted by qualified archaeologists.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.5-11 through 3.5-12) and the 2023 SEIR (pages 3.5-2 through 3.5-3) found that impacts related to the potential to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 would be significant and unavoidable. As described in the Cultural Resources Assessment, no historically significant built resources were identified within the Development Concept site. Therefore, a project consistent with the Development Concept would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource and there would be no impact.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.5-12 through 3.5-13) and 2023 SEIR (pages 3.5-3 through 3.5-6) found that impacts related to the potential to cause a substance adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource as defined in Section 15064.5 would be significant and unavoidable. The Cultural Resources Assessment did not identify any precontact archaeological resources during the survey. However, the potential for affecting previously unknown subsurface resources is unknown. A project consistent with the Development Concept would be subject to uniformly applied development standards in the form of 2016 General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure CUL-2 and General Plan Natural and Cultural Resources Implementation Program 25, and 840

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-22 City of West Sacramento
Mitigation Measure TCR-1. Mitigation Measure CUL-2, General Plan Natural and Cultural Resources Implementation Program 25, and Mitigation Measure TCR-1 require:

Ź Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Require appropriate treatment for inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources. The City will require, through permit or tentative map conditions or contractual obligations, that in the event of any inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources, all such finds will be subject to PRC 21083.2 and State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5. Procedures for inadvertent discovery are listed below. x All work within 100 feet of the find will be halted until a professional archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find in accordance with NRHP and CRHR criteria. x If any find is determined to be significant by the archaeologist, representatives of the City will meet with the archaeologist to determine the appropriate course of action. If necessary, a Treatment Plan will be prepared by an archeologist, outlining recovery of the resource, analysis, and reporting of the find. The Treatment Plan will be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to resuming construction. x All significant cultural materials recovered will be subject to scientific analysis, professional curation, and a report prepared by the professional archaeologist according to current professional standards.

Ź General Plan Natural and Cultural Resources Implementation Program 25. The City shall require that when any subsurface cultural resources, paleontological resources, or human remains are encountered, all work within 100 feet of the discovery be stopped and the area protected from further disturbance until the discovery is evaluated. The resources shall be evaluated by qualified personnel to determine their significance and develop appropriate measures to avoid or protect valuable resources.

Ź Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Consistent with current state statutory requirements, invite government to government consultation with traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American Tribes, assess impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources (TCR), avoid or preserve in place those TCR, and include culturally appropriate mitigation for significant impacts to identified TCR to the extent feasible. The City will invite government to government consultation with traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American Tribes that have requested consultation for both public and private sector projects that are subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), consistent with current state statutory requirements. The City will also invite government to government consultation on projects with a Federal nexus, pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, where applicable. The City will provide information about the project and its location, and specifically invite traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American Tribes to provide information about known tribal cultural resources (TCR) that could be affected by proposed projects, and seek recommendations in the consultation process for mitigation that would avoid, preserve in place, or reduce potential impacts to such resources. The City will require projects subject to CEQA that have the potential for significant impacts to identified TCR to include government to government consultation with California Native American Tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area, assess the feasibility of avoidance or preservation in place of TCR, and minimize impacts with culturally appropriate, feasible mitigation. Based on the assessment, recommendations for mitigation measures may include, but are not limited to additional studies to evaluate identified sites, or tribal monitoring at locations determined by the City in consultation with the California Native American Tribe, supported by substantial evidence and considering the significance of the resource to the California Native American Tribe, to be culturally sensitive for TCR. If TCR are not identified that may be directly or indirectly impacted by the project, then mitigation is not needed.

In the event of the discovery of a previously unknown TCR inadvertently exposed or impacted during project implementation, a qualified archaeologist with expertise in TCR in the area will be retained by the project applicant to assess the discovery and provide mitigation recommendations as necessary. Such recommendations shall be reviewed in consultation with the impacted California Native American Tribe. When a project will impact a known TCR and avoidance is not a feasible option, a qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American Tribe, shall evaluate the eligibility of the site for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources according to the criteria in Public Resources Code Section 21074. If the TCR is found to be a historical resource as Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c), and considering the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21074, the qualified archaeologist shall recommend further mitigative treatment, which may include avoidance or preservation in place. Data recovery on a TCR, if 841
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-23 CEQA Consistency Analysis
necessary to support the historic resources evaluation, shall only be conducted in accordance with cultural practices and the written consent of the Tribe.

If TCR that also meet the definition of historical or unique archaeological resources are identified in the project area, the preferred mitigation to reduce impacts is avoidance, or preservation in place if avoidance is infeasible. Options for avoidance and preservation of the resource in place may include, but are not limited to, planning and construction to avoid the resource and protect the cultural and natural context, planning greenspace, parks, or other open space to incorporate the resource with culturally appropriate protection and management criteria, treating the resource with culturally appropriate dignity, or permanent conservation easements or other interests in real property, with culturally appropriate management criteria, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21084.3.

If impacts cannot feasibly be avoided through project redesign, culturally appropriate and feasible mitigation measures will be required. These may consist of, but are not limited to, further evaluation, recognition of the significance of the area to the California Native American Tribe, or other mitigation measures determined to be feasible in consultation with the California Native American Tribe. If the recommendation is for further evaluation that includes data recovery, data recovery shall only be conducted in accordance with cultural practices and the written consent of the Tribe. If only part of a site will be impacted by a project, in the event that data recovery is warranted, then data recovery will only be necessary for that portion of the site.

Destructive d recovery of TCR will not be required if the City determines prior testing and studies have adequately recovered the scientifically consequential information from the resources, or if the impacted California Native American Tribe or Tribes participating in consultation objects to it.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.5-14) and 2023 SEIR (pages 3.5-6 through 3.5-7) found that impacts related to the disturbance of human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries, would be significant and unavoidable. A project consistent with the Development Concept would be subject to uniformly applied development standards in the form of 2016 General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure CUL-3, which would implement appropriate treatment for the discovery of human remains. Mitigation Measure CUL-3 requires:

Ź Mitigation Measure CUL-3: Implement appropriate treatment for discovery of human remains. The City will require, through permit or tentative map conditions, that in the event that human remains are discovered, all work shall cease in the vicinity (minimum of 100 feet) of the find and the Yolo County coroner will be notified immediately. If the coroner determines the remains to be Native American in origin, the coroner will be responsible for notifying the NAHC, which will appoint a most likely descendant (MLD; PRC Section 5097.99).

The project applicant, County, and MLD will make all reasonable efforts to develop an agreement for the dignified treatment of human remains and associated or unassociated funerary objects (CCR Title 14 Section 15064.5[d]). The agreement should take into consideration the appropriate excavation, removal, recordation, analysis, custodianship, curation, and final disposition of the human remains and associated or unassociated funerary objects. The MLD will have 48 hours after notification by the NAHC to make their recommendation (PRC Section 5097.98). If the MLD does not agree to the reburial method, the project will follow PRC Section 5097.98(b), which states, “the landowner or his or her authorized representative shall reinter the human remains and items associated with Native American burials with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance.”

842

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-24 City of West Sacramento
This page left intentionally blank
843
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-25 CEQA Consistency Analysis

3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

3.7.1 DISCUSSION
Development within the Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development anticipated under the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the General Plan EIR and SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the Grand Gateway Zoning District. The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA analysis in terms of a project consistent with the Development Concept. The impacts, then, associated with a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the zoning district were addressed as a part of the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR, and there are no projectspecific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or the site that would result in additional impacts beyond those identified in the 2016 General Plan EIR or 2023 SEIR.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.7-14 through 3.7-17) and the 2023 SEIR (pages 3.7-6 through 3.7-11) found that, even with implementation of mitigation measures, there would be a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact related to generation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for both construction and operation. As part of the 2023 SEIR, existing and future land use data were updated and used to create a new estimate of VMT, average daily travel along city streets, and GHG emissions under existing and future conditions. These new data show a decrease in GHG emissions through 2040 as compared to existing conditions – mostly attributable to a decrease in mobile source emissions due to improvements in vehicle technology and efficiency.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.7-18 to 3.7-20) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.7-11) found there would be a significant and unavoidable impact from conflicts with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Specifically, although development envisioned in the General Plan would be consistent with Assembly Bill 32 (which codified the State’s GHG emissions reduction targets through 2020), and SACOG’s MTP/SCS, overall emission levels would be inconsistent with the goals of Executive Order S-3-05 and Executive Order B-30-15. Executive Order S-3-05 calls for the State government to reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels by 2010; to 1990 levels by 2020; and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Since certification of the 2016 General Plan EIR, Senate Bill 32 was signed, extending the provisions of Assembly Bill 32 from 2020 to 2030 with a new target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, in alignment with the goal established under Executive Order B-30-15. The City is currently in the process of developing a climate action plan that would demonstrate local consistency with the State’s legislative framework for GHG emissions reduction.

Analysis in the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR includes emissions associated with implementation of the Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District in the GHG emission estimates prepared for both the 2016 General Plan EIR (Table 3.7-6 page 3.7-17) and the 2023 SEIR (Table 3.7-1 page 3.7-7). A project consistent with the Development Concept within the zoning district would consist of transit-oriented development designed to reduce VMT and emphasize pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access – changes that would tend to reduce GHG emissions and promote consistency with State efforts at reducing GHG emissions, as well as 844

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-26 City of West Sacramento
consistency with SACOG’s MTP/SCS. The Development Concept includes housing, retail, residential amenities, parking, a park, a public plaza, and a hotel – not any uses that have unusual GHG emissions rates or characteristics.

845
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-27 CEQA Consistency Analysis

3.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site; ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or offsite; or
iii) Create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv) Impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?

3.8.1 DISCUSSION
Development within the Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development projected under the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the Grand Gateway Zoning District.

The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA analysis in terms of a project consistent with the Development Concept. The impacts, then, associated with a project consistent with the Development Concept were addressed as a part of the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR, and there are no project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or the site that would result in additional impacts beyond those identified in the 2016 General Plan EIR or 2023 SEIR.
846

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-28 City of West Sacramento
The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.9-46 through 3.9-51) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.8-3) found that potential violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements from future development (both construction and operation) would result in less-than-significant impacts. A project consistent with the Development Concept would include construction and operational activities that would subject soil to stormwater runoff during the winter rainy season and could include increased pollutants from stormwater runoff on impervious surfaces after development. However, a project consistent with the Development Concept would be subject to uniform development standards in the form of preparing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and implementing associated Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board’s Construction General Permit as part of the National Pollutant Discharge and Elimination System (NPDES) program. Furthermore, a future project applicant would be subject to uniform development standards in the form incorporating Low Impact Development (LID) features specifically designed to provide operational water quality treatment at the source as required by the City’s Phase II Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) NPDES Permit. Implementation of these local and state requirements would ensure that a project consistent with the Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements and would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.9-51 and 3.9-52) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.8-3) found that the potential for new development to deplete groundwater resources would be less than significant, because most of the recharge to the shallow groundwater aquifer occurs directly from the Sacramento River. Therefore, changes to the amount of impervious land cover would not be significant compared to the controlling factor of the water surface elevations in the Sacramento River and Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel. The Grand Gateway Zoning District was formerly developed with buildings and pavement, and Development Blocks DB2 and DB1 currently are developed with a former motel and surface parking. Therefore, a project consistent with the Development Concept within the zoning district would not result in a substantial increase in impervious surfaces as compared to current and previous conditions, and furthermore would not cause a decrease in water supplies because it would not obtain its water supply from groundwater wells. Thus, a project consistent with the Development Concept within the zoning district would also not result in conflicts with the Yolo Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.9-52 through 3.9-55) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.8-3) found that alteration of drainage patterns from future development within the city would result in less-than-significant impacts from erosion, flooding, and stormwater drainage. A project consistent with the Development Concept, as with all other projects within the city, would be subject to uniform development standards in the form of implementing the construction and operational NPDES program requirements to ensure that additional increases in stormwater runoff and associated pollutants from development are adequately treated and managed. Furthermore, prior to issuance of building permits, a future applicant would be subject to uniform development standards in the form of submission of detailed stormwater drainage plans based on City standards to the City for review and approval.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.9-60 and 3.9-61) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.8-3) found that placement of structures that could impede or redirect flood flows would be a less-than-significant impact. The City of West Sacramento is surrounded on all sides by flood control levees. If there is a levee breach, the city is subject to flooding by the Sacramento River. The West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (WSAFCA) together with the California Department of Water Resources, Central Valley Flood Protection Board, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, are in the process of designing and constructing projects that meet the 200-year level of flood protection requirement imposed by updated state law and updated federal levee standards. Seven planned levee improvement projects to provide increased flood protection for the city have been completed, and three more are either in process or are planned for the future (City of West Sacramento 2024). The Grand Gateway Zoning District is the City’s urban core area and has been in the past and still partially is today developed with buildings and parking areas. A project consistent with the Development Concept would be subject to uniform development standards in the form of required compliance with the City’s Floodplain Management Ordinance (Title 18 of the Municipal Code), which requires all development within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) special flood hazard area to be constructed using floodproof methods and elevated to withstand flooding.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.9-61 and 3.9-62) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.8-3) found that the risk of release of pollutants due to project inundation within a seiche, tsunami, or flood hazard zone would be a lessthan-significant impact. Due to the distance from the Pacific Ocean, the City is not susceptible to tsunami 847
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-29 CEQA Consistency Analysis
hazards. The Sacramento River, Yolo and Sacramento Bypasses, and the Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel are susceptible to seiches. However, the danger of seiches during seismic events is limited to those periods when these waterbodies are full during the flood season. Overtopping of levees during this period could cause a limited amount of flooding in the city; however, the risk under these conditions is greatly reduced because the Sacramento River and Yolo and Sacramento Bypasses are at these flood stages for a limited time. Although implementation of a project consistent with the Development Concept (as with all development contemplated under the General Plan) would increase the number of persons and property potentially at risk from seiche, it would not contribute to inundation depth if an event were to occur. Temporary construction-related storage of hazardous materials such as fuel, oil, and paints at all locations within the city are potentially subject to inundation in the event of a levee breach. However, a project consistent with the Development Concept would be subject to uniform development standards in the form of required compliance with the City’s Floodplain Management Ordinance (Title 18 of the Municipal Code), which regulates construction and storage of materials within special flood hazard zones.

848

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-30 City of West Sacramento
This page left intentionally blank
849
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-31 CEQA Consistency Analysis

3.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING

3.9.1 DISCUSSION
The Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development projected under the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the Grand Gateway Zoning District. The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA analysis in terms of a project consistent with the Development Concept within the zoning district. The impacts, then, associated with a project consistent with the Development Concept within the zoning district were addressed as a part of the General Plan EIR and SEIR, and there are no projectspecific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or the site that would result in additional impacts beyond those identified in the 2016 General Plan EIR or 2023 SEIR.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.10-5 and 3.10-6) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.10-1) found that development in the city would result in a less-than-significant impact from physical division of an established community. The types of features that could physically divide an established community include new roads through existing contiguous land uses, developments that prevent movement between existing land uses, and physical features such as sound walls that create barriers between or within existing land uses. A project consistent with the Development Concept would involve construction of buildings, parking areas, recreational spaces, drive aisles and connections to existing streets, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and water, sewer, drainage, and electricity improvements. No infrastructure would divide any existing developed neighborhood or community. There would be no division of an established community.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.10-7 and 3.10-8) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.10-1) found that new development in the city would result in a less-than-significant impact from conflicts with plans designed to avoid or mitigate adverse environmental impacts. The City regulates land uses within West Sacramento through its zoning and subdivision ordinances and, indirectly, through the goals and policies of its General Plan that guide development. The City proposes the Grand Gateway Zoning District to implement the General Plan and replace the former Grand Gateway Master Plan in substantially the same area. Although some of the standards in the Grand Gateway Zoning District would be different from the former Master Plan, the new Zoning District standards would all be consistent with the General Plan 2035 and the 2023 General Plan update. As a compact, mixed-use, infill development in an area with relatively low vehicular travel demand (low VMT), a project consistent with the Development Concept would help facilitate the City’s goals related to promoting pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access and reducing greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutant emissions, as well as similar goals in SACOG’s MTP/SCS.

850

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-32 City of West Sacramento
This page left intentionally blank
851
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-33 CEQA Consistency Analysis

3.10 NOISE

3.10.1 DISCUSSION
The Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development projected under the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the Grand Gateway Zoning District. The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA analysis in terms of a project consistent with the Development Concept.

The impacts, then, associated with a project consistent with the Development Concept were addressed as a part of the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR, and there are no project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or the site that would result in additional impacts beyond those identified in the 2016 General Plan EIR or 2023 SEIR.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.12-14 through 3.12-23) and the 2023 SEIR (pages 3.12-18 through 3.12-25) evaluated the potential impacts related to temporary and permanent increases in ambient noise levels. The 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR concluded that temporary construction-related noise and long-term traffic noise would likely exceed established noise standards, resulting in significant and unavoidable impacts.

Consistent with the analysis in the 2016 General Plan EIR and 2023 SEIR, construction activities associated with a project consistent with the Development Concept could cause short-term, temporary noise impacts. These impacts are influenced by factors such as proximity to receptors, presence of barriers, type of equipment used, and duration of construction activities. However, a project consistent with the Development Concept would be required to comply with uniform development standards outlined in Chapter 17.28 of the City’s Municipal Code, which addresses noise limitations and would need to implement Policy S-7.10 to reduce potential noise impacts related to construction. Policy S-7.10 requires:

Ź Policy S-7.10 Acoustical Study. The City shall require new development that has the potential to generate noise that will exceed the levels contained in Tables S-7.1 through Table S-7.4 and may affect a noise sensitive use to prepare an acoustical study. The acoustical study shall:
852

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-34 City of West Sacramento
• Be prepared by a qualified person experienced in the fields of environmental noise assessment and architectural acoustics; the person preparing the acoustical study shall consult with Planning Department staff to review specific issues or circumstances prior to commencing the study; • Provide a general description of the project and the noise sources of concern; appropriate maps shall be included;
• Describe the methodology that will be used to assess noise impacts. If computer models are to be used for noise predictions, they should be standard versions approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Caltrans, or other government agencies; • Include representative noise level measurements with sufficient sampling periods and locations to adequately describe local conditions and predominant noise sources; • Estimate existing and projected noise levels and compare those levels to the adopted policies and standards of the Noise Element;
• Recommend appropriate mitigation to achieve compliance with the adopted policies and standards of the Noise Element; where feasible, noise mitigation measures should focus on site planning and project design solutions rather than the creation of noise barriers; mitigation measures must be written with specific mitigation needed, and include any proposed follow-up noise monitoring if needed; and • Estimate noise exposure after the prescribed mitigation measures have been implemented.

For operational noise, consistent with the analysis presented in the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR, a project consistent with the Development Concept could result in noise levels exceeding established standards for existing and future noise-sensitive uses, which includes noise generated from operational sources such as traffic and other fixed non-transportation sources. Specifically, traffic associated with the General Plan buildout could cause noise levels in outdoor activity areas near noise-sensitive uses to exceed the General Plan’s exterior noise standard of 65 dBA Ldn/CNEL for outdoor activity areas associated with multi-family residential development and lodging. A project consistent with the Development Concept within the zoning district would be subject to uniform development standards in Chapter 17.28 of the City’s Municipal Code.

Noise measurements for the properties included within the Development Concept show that existing noise levels are consistent with the City’s exterior noise standards for outdoor gathering areas associated with multi-family residential development and lodging. Existing noise levels are 65 dBA Ldn in the eastern portion of the Development Concept site, 60 dB Ldn in the northern portion of the site, and 64 dBA Ldn in the western portion of the site.

Additionally, consistent with the analysis presented in the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR, a project consistent with the Development Concept could generate stationary source noise from mechanical equipment, use of a park, landscape maintenance, and use of surface parking areas. A project consistent with the Development Concept should be subject to Policy S-7.2 which requires development to mitigate noise impacts on noise-sensitive uses consistent with Table S-7.2 of the General Plan 2035 based on the existing peak noise level.

Policy S-7.2 requires:

Ź Policy S-7.2 Exterior Incremental Noise Standards. The City shall require new development to mitigate noise impacts on noise-sensitive uses where the projected increases in exterior noise levels exceed those shown in Table S-7.2 (Exterior Incremental Noise Impact Standards).

The maximum noise level at the Development Concept site was measured as 90.8 dBA and the peak hourly noise level would be approximately 69 dBA. According to Policy S-7.2, stationary source noise attributable to a project consistent with the Development Concept would be allowed a noise increment of up to 1 dBA in the outdoor 853
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-35 CEQA Consistency Analysis
gathering areas associated with the existing apartment building at 825 Tower Bridge Gateway, approximately 114 feet south-southeast of the Development Concept site, as measured at the closest point.

The 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR state that noise from trains is not expected to increase significantly in the future compared to existing conditions. However, a project consistent with the Development Concept would be exposed to train noise. The 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR require that a project consistent with the current Development Concept comply with the City’s vibration standards in Chapter 17.28 of the Municipal Code and implement Policy S-7.11, which requires new vibration-sensitive developments to mitigate impacts if projected vibration levels exceed those specified in the General Plan standards. Policy S-7.11 requires:

Ź Policy S-7.11 Vibration Standards. The City shall require new development of vibration-sensitive land uses to mitigate vibration impacts where the projected vibration levels exceed those shown in Table S-7.4 in the General Plan update.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.12-23 to 3.12-25) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.12-25) identified that generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels would be significant and unavoidable, even with compliance with the vibration performance standards set in Table S-7.4 of the General Plan. A project consistent with the Development Concept would be required to implement these mitigation measures to reduce potential effects on nearby sensitive receptors by monitoring and controlling vibration levels during construction activities, in line with the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR findings. Policy S-7.6 requires:

Ź Policy S-7.6 Vibration Standards. The City shall require construction projects and new development anticipated to generate a significant amount of vibration to ensure acceptable interior vibration levels at nearby noise-sensitive uses based on Federal Transit Administration criteria as shown in Table S-7.4 (Groundborne Vibration Impact Criteria for General Assessment).

Because the Grand Gateway Zoning District is not situated within two miles of a public airport or private airstrip, a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the zoning district would have no impact related to exposure of people to the excessive airport or aircraft noise levels. 854

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-36 City of West Sacramento
This page left intentionally blank
855
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-37 CEQA Consistency Analysis

3.11 POPULATION AND HOUSING

3.11.1 DISCUSSION
The Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development projected under the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the General Plan EIR and SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the zoning district. The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the General Plan EIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA analysis in terms of a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the zoning district. The impacts, then, associated with a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the zoning district were addressed as a part of the General Plan EIR and SEIR, and there are no project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or the site that would result in additional impacts beyond those identified in the General Plan EIR or SEIR.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (page 3.13-6) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.13-1) found that new development in the City would result in a significant and unavoidable impact related to substantial population growth. The General Plan found that new homes or businesses would indirectly result in population growth through individual developments and the extension of roads and other infrastructure improvements as the city becomes more completely developed. A project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would result in up to 455 housing units, approximately 30,000 square feet of retail space, and between 110 to 140 hotel rooms. Future development within the Grand Gateway Zoning District was planned for in the General Plan 2035 and prior to the current proposal for a new Grand Gateway Zoning District, this development was implemented through the CBD zoning district and the Grand Gateway zoning overlay.

Development has long been planned for the Development Concept site, and a proposed project consistent with the Development Concept would be consistent with the City’s General Plan. Therefore, a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would not induce substantial unplanned population growth.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.13-16 and 3.13-17) and the 2023 SEIR (page 3.13-1) found that, because the General Plan does not enable direct construction of new development, the impact from displacement of substantial numbers of existing people or housing would be less than significant. A project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would require demolition of the former Rodeway Inn in Development Block 2. This building is a 40-room motel structure constructed in 1975, which is now gated and used as a Homekey Program providing temporary emergency housing to the City’s homeless population. Implementation of a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would require the City to relocate people from this building to another facility. The City has a commitment to maintain operations of the Homekey Program at the former Rodeway Inn site until end of 2025. The City has recently acquired two additional motel sites along West Capitol Avenue which will be used to 856

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-38 City of West Sacramento
initially expand the City's homeless emergency housing options and will also be used to transition program participants from the Homekey Program site as this program winds down. 857
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-39 CEQA Consistency Analysis

3.12 TRANSPORTATION

3.12.1 DISCUSSION
Development within the Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development projected under the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the Grand Gateway Zoning District. The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA analysis in terms of a project consistent with the Development Concept. The impacts, then, associated with a project consistent with the Development Concept within the zoning district were addressed as a part of the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR, and there are no project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or the site that would result in additional impacts beyond those identified in the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.16-18) and the 2023 Draft SEIR (pages 3.16-6 through 3.16-7) identified a less-than-significant impact related to policy conflicts. While the Development Concept does not detail bicycle and pedestrian facilities or multi-modal transportation, as a mixed-use development, a future project would be subject to uniformly applied development standards that typically include provisions for enhancing pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access, as outlined in Chapter 17.09 of the City Municipal Code, and compliance with City street design standards. The Development Concept includes a compact, mixed-use, infill development project in an area within West Sacramento that produces relatively low vehicular travel demand. Therefore, a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would not conflict with any existing program, plan, ordinance, or policy, maintaining consistency with the findings in the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR.

CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b), was not explicitly addressed in the 2016 General Plan EIR. As explained in the 2023 SEIR, SACOG, pursuant to the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375) incorporates State-developed GHG emissions targets for passenger vehicle emissions into a “sustainable communities strategy” as part of its regional transportation plan. SACOG has also developed analysis and mapping showing the location of low-VMT areas within the region. For residential generated VMT, most of the developed portion of West Sacramento – essentially all of the city north of the Deep Water Channel is in a low VMT area, as identified by SACOG – an area where the density, mix of land uses, access to nonvehicular transportation options, and other factors result in a reduced need for vehicular transportation compared 858

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-40 City of West Sacramento
to the balance of the region.1 VMT is a potential indicator of environmental effects from air pollutant emissions, GHG emissions, and transportation noise. A project consistent with the Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would represent compact, mixed-use, infill development in a relatively low VMT area. A project similar to the Development Concept would help to reduce VMT.

The 2016 General Plan EIR did not specifically address hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses. However, a project consistent with the current Development Concept in the Grand Gateway Zoning District would be subject to uniform development standards requiring compliance with Title 15 (Building and Construction) and Title 17 (Zoning) of the City’s Municipal Code, which includes implementing measures to ensure safety and design standards, as well as the City’s street design standards, which are designed to avoid introducing traffic-related hazards as a part of new development. Consistent with the analyses and mitigation measures presented in the 2023 Draft SEIR, the proposed project would not introduce any geometric design features or incompatible uses that would increase hazards.

The 2016 General Plan EIR did not specifically address emergency access in its impact analysis but included a General Plan policy requiring the identification of emergency access routes and ensuring that they are kept free of traffic impediments. The 2023 Draft SEIR (page 3.16-8) addresses emergency access under Impact TRA-9 and finds a less-than-significant impact related to inadequate emergency access. A project consistent with the current Development Concept within the zoning district would be required to meet the requirements of Chapter 15.14 (California Fire Code) of the City’s Municipal Code. Therefore, the impact on emergency access for the proposed project remains consistent with the findings in the 2023 Draft SEIR. 1 Please see SACOG’s website for more details:
https://sacog.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=0eac172e44514776b2f30e4324652f88&extent=- 13567338.6225%2C4599309.7898%2C-13330078.0867%2C4789485.1162%2C102100 859
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-41 CEQA Consistency Analysis

3.13 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES

i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in local
register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in
its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying
the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native American
tribe?

3.13.1 DISCUSSION
Development within the Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development projected under the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the Grand Gateway Zoning District. The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA analysis in terms of a project consistent with the Development Concept.

AECOM contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on July 29, 2024 requesting a review of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) and a list of Tribes and individuals who may have information regarding the project area. The request contained location details, project map, and a general description of the project. This request is NOT considered a formal notification of a proposed project as required under CEQA, specifically Cal. Public Res.

Code Section 21080.3.1 and Chapter 532 Statutes of 2014. The NAHC responded on August 8, 2024 with a positive result and a list of Native American contacts.

No precontact archaeological resources were identified during the survey of the Development Concept site, as described in the Cultural Resources Assessment.

As detailed in the 2023 SEIR, when updating the General Plan in 2023, the City sent invitations to consult pursuant to SB 18 and AB 52 to all Native American tribal representatives identified by the Native American Heritage Commission and all Native American tribal representatives that have indicated to the City that they wish 860

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-42 City of West Sacramento
to be invited for consultation for projects subject to CEQA review. The Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation, Wilton Rancheria, and Buena Vista Rancheria requested to consult. The City incorporated input from the Native American representatives into the updated General Plan and 2023 SEIR, including Mitigation Measure CUL-2b, which clarifies the consultation process and reduces potential impacts to tribal cultural resources, consistent with current state statutory and regulatory requirements. The City commissioned a study consistent with General Plan Implementation Program 24, which requires a site evaluation and field survey. In addition, a project consistent with the Development Concept should be conditioned to implement uniformly applied development standards in the form of General Plan Implementation Program 25 and Mitigation Measure CUL-2, which require actions to avoid impacts in the event of inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources. In addition, if an application is filed for a project similar to the Development Concept, the City should condition the project to comply with Mitigation Measure CUL-2b, which is designed to reduce or avoid adverse impacts to significant archaeological resources, including those which are tribal cultural sources or are associated with a tribal cultural resource. 861
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-43 CEQA Consistency Analysis

3.14 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
Project or
Project Site
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in GP
EIR or SEIR
Not Applicable
No Impact
Addressed by
the General
Plan EIR, SEIR
and/or Uniform
Development
Policies and
Programs
Utilities and Service Systems. Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction
or relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider that serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project’s projected demand, in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity
of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, State, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?

3.14.1 DISCUSSION
Development within the Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the scope of development projected under the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR. The same properties that were assumed to develop under the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR are also assumed to potentially develop in the Grand Gateway Zoning District. The land use change assumptions that were used to drive the analysis in the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR are consistent with those now assumed for this CEQA analysis in terms of a project consistent with the Development Concept. The impacts, then, associated with a project consistent with the Development Concept were addressed as a part of the 2016 General Plan EIR and the 2023 SEIR, and there are no projectspecific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or the site that would result in additional impacts beyond those identified in the General Plan EIR or SEIR.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.17-16 through 3.17-19) found that new development in the city would result in less-than-significant impacts from construction of new utilities. Development Block 2 within the Grand Gateway Zoning District, which includes the former Rodeway Inn currently being used as part of the City’s Homekey Program for temporary emergency housing, has an existing stormwater drainage system that could potentially be used, with some modifications, as well as existing electricity and telecommunications services, for future development within that block. Development Block 1 has an existing stormwater drainage ditch around the northern edge of the property which could potentially be used for future development within that block. A project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would be subject to uniformly applied development standards in the form of stormwater drainage plans prepared according to City 862

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-44 City of West Sacramento
standards and submitted to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. A project consistent with the Development Concept would also be subject to uniformly applied development standards in the form of City review and approval of wastewater and water conveyance facilities, as well as other utilities including electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (page 3.17-19) found that new development in the City would result in a significant and unavoidable impact from the increased water demand resulting from population growth through implementation of new and redevelopment. The City’s primary water source is the Sacramento River via an intake structure located at Bryte Bend, upstream from the confluence of the Sacramento and American rivers. Water withdrawn from the Sacramento River is treated at the City's George Kristoff Water Treatment Plant at 400 North Harbor Boulevard north of Interstate 80. The 2016 EIR (page 3.17-7) also noted that the City had one operational groundwater well as a backup supply with a capacity of 2.3 million gallons per day, and a second well was planned to be constructed as supplemental backup to replace a well that was no longer operational. The backup supply was intended to meet the demands of the northern portion of West Sacramento outside the North Delta Water Agency’s (NDWA’s) boundary.

The Grand Gateway Zoning District is within the NDWA’s service area (2016 EIR Figure 3.17-1, page 3.17-9). As noted in the 2016 EIR (page 3.17-19), the NDWA’s 2010 Urban Water Management Plan documented 2010 water demand at 13,107 acre-feet per year and estimated that the demand in 2035 would increase to 23,920 acre-feet per year. The 2016 EIR also stated that due to uncertainties about the reliability of the water supply from the NDWA under all water year conditions, it is possible that water supplies would not be sufficient to meet the increased demand. A project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would result in up to 455 housing units, approximately 30,000 square feet of retail space, and between 110 to 140 hotel rooms. According to the City of West Sacramento 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, for 2025, 2030, 2035, and 2040, and for single dry years, two dry years, and three dry years, the City has a surplus in water supply (City of West Sacramento 2016). Development within West Sacramento, including within the Grand Gateway Zoning District, has been included in the City’s water demand analysis. Therefore, a project consistent with the Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would not induce substantial unplanned population growth and therefore would not require additional water supply.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.17-16 through 3.17-18) found that new development in the City would result in a less-than-significant impact from increased demand for wastewater treatment because the existing capacity of the EchoWater Resource Recovery Facility (formerly Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant) will be sufficient for the next 40+ years, in part because SacSewer (formerly Sacramento County Regional Sanitation District) projects that per-capita consumption will fall by approximately 25 percent over the next 20+ years due to the installation of water meters and adoption of various water conservation mandates. As discussed above in Section 3.11, “Population and Housing,” future development within the Grand Gateway Zoning District was accounted for in the 2016 General Plan through the former Grand Gateway Master Plan. Therefore, a project consistent with the current Development Concept within the Grand Gateway Zoning District would not induce substantial unplanned population growth and therefore would not require wastewater treatment that is greater than the 2016 EIR forecast.

The 2016 General Plan EIR (pages 3.17-20 and 3.17-21) found that new development in the city would result in a less-than-significant impact related to generation of solid waste in excess of local infrastructure and compliance with solid waste standards. The Yolo County Central Landfill, which serves the City of West Sacramento, is expected to have adequate capacity until the year 2124 with a permitted capacity of 49 million cubic yards and a remaining capacity of more than 33 million cubic yards (California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery 2024). In addition, a project consistent with the current Development Concept would be subject to uniformly applied development standards in the form of compliance with state laws and policy designed to reduce the future landfill waste stream and extend the lifespan of the landfill. For example, the California Green Building Code requires that at least 65 percent of construction and demolition waste be diverted from landfills. The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 requires local agencies to implement source reduction, recycling, and composting that would result in a minimum of 50 percent diversion of solid waste from landfills.

Assembly Bill (AB) 341 subsequently established, as a State policy goal, that at least 75 percent of the solid waste that is generated must be source-reduced, recycled, or composted by the year 2020. AB 341 also requires local jurisdictions to implement commercial solid waste recycling programs. Businesses that generate four cubic 863
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 3-45 CEQA Consistency Analysis
yards or more of solid waste per week or multifamily dwellings of five units or more must arrange for recycling services. AB 1826 requires businesses to recycle their organic waste.

As discussed above in Section 3.11, “Population and Housing,” future development within the Grand Gateway Zoning District was accounted for in the 2016 General Plan through the former Grand Gateway Master Plan.

Therefore, a project consistent with the current Development Concept would not generate solid waste in excess of local infrastructure and would be required to comply with local and state solid waste standards designed to reduce the amount of waste to landfills.
864

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 3-46 City of West Sacramento
This page left intentionally blank
865
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 4-1 CEQA Consistency Analysis
4 UNIFORMLY APPLIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

4.1 AESTHETICS
Ź Mitigation Measure AES-3a: Apply Minimum Lighting Standards and Reduce Glare. Outdoor lighting shall be limited to safety and security requirements and designed using Illuminating Engineering Society’s design guidelines and in compliance with International Dark-Sky Association approved fixtures; use materials in new buildings that reduce glare; windows in mid-rise and high-rise buildings must be designed to reduce glare.

Ź Mitigation Measure AES-3c: Apply Minimum Lighting Standards. New buildings must use low-intensity interior safety lighting for use after business hours instead of standard interior safety lighting; all non-safety lighting, such as in offices and hallways, must be turned off after business hours; employ the most current light pollution reduction techniques in new building design.

4.2 AIR QUALITY
Ź Mitigation Measure AQ-2: Implement construction dust control mitigation measures described in YSAQMD’s CEQA Handbook (language added below from YSAQMD Handbook). • Water all active construction sites at least twice daily. Frequency should be based on the type of operation, soil, and wind exposure.
• Haul trucks shall maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard. • Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, or loose materials. • Apply non-toxic binders (e.g., latex acrylic copolymer) to exposed areas after cut and fill operations and hydroseed area.
• Apply chemical soil stabilizers on inactive construction areas (disturbed lands within construction projects that are unused for at least four consecutive days).
• Plant tree windbreaks on the windward perimeter of construction projects if adjacent to open land. • Plant vegetative ground cover in disturbed areas as soon as possible. • Cover inactive storage piles.
• Sweep streets if visible soil material is carried out from the construction site. • Treat accesses to a distance of 100 feet from the paved road with a 6 to 12 inch layer of wood chips or mulch.
• Treat accesses to a distance of 100 feet from the paved road with a 6- inch layer of gravel.

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 4-2 City of West Sacramento

4.3 BIOLOGICAL REOSURCES
Ź Policy NCR-2.4 Habitat Surveys. The City shall require site-specific surveys for discretionary development proposals that could potentially impact biological resources to determine if any significant wildlife habitat and vegetation resources will be adversely affected and, if so, to identify appropriate measures to avoid or mitigate such impacts. Include protection measures to avoid and minimize the introduction and spread of invasive plants in all habitat mitigation requirements.

Ź AMM10: Avoid and Minimize Effects on Wetlands and Waters. Prior to construction, the project proponent shall consult with CDFW to determine if a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement is necessary for impacts. If it is, the project proponent will apply for a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement and implement all conditions set forth in the permit. Project proponents will comply with stormwater management plans that regulate development as part of compliance with regulations under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. Covered activities that result in any fill of waters or wetlands will also comply with requirements under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, State Water Resources Control Board (State Board), Fish and Game Code Section 1602, and Regional Board regulations.

Other than requirements for buffers, minimizing project footprint, and species-specific measures for wetlanddependent covered species, this HCP/NCCP does not include specific best management practices for protecting wetlands and waters because they may conflict with measures required by the USACE, State Board, Regional Board, and CDFW.

Ź AMM 8: Avoid and Minimize Effects of Construction Staging Areas and Temporary Work Areas.

Ź AMM 8: Avoid and Minimize Effects of Construction Staging Areas and Temporary Work Areas. Project proponents should locate construction staging and other temporary work areas for covered activities in areas that will ultimately be a part of the permanent project development footprint. If construction staging and other temporary work areas must be located outside of permanent project footprints, they will be located either in areas that do not support habitat for covered species or are easily restored to prior or improved ecological functions (e.g., grassland and agricultural land). Construction staging and other temporary work areas located outside of project footprints will be sited in areas that avoid adverse effects on the following:
• Serpentine, valley oak woodland, alkali prairie, vernal pool complex, valley foothill riparian, and fresh emergent wetland land cover types.
• Occupied western burrowing owl burrows. Occupied for the purpose of AMM8 means at least one burrowing owl has been observed occupying the burrow within the last three years. Occupancy of a burrow may also be indicated by owl sign at the burrow entrance, including molted feathers, cast pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement at or near a burrow entrance or perch site. • Nest sites for covered bird species and all raptors, including noncovered raptors, during the breeding season.

Restoration of vegetation in temporary work and staging areas will use clean, native seed mixes approved by the Conservancy that are free of noxious plant species seeds. 867
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 4-3 CEQA Consistency Analysis
Ź AMM 16: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Habitat of Swainson’s Hawk and White-Tailed Kite.

Ź AMM 16: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Habitat of Swainson’s Hawk and White-Tailed Kite.

Ź Comply, as applicable, with Chapter 8.24 of the City of West Sacramento Code of Ordinances, Tree Preservation.

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 4-4 City of West Sacramento
wetlands), and associated functions and values by regulating development in and near these habitats and promoting projects that avoid sensitive areas. Where habitat loss is unavoidable, the City shall require replacement consistent with State and Federal regulations protecting riparian, SRA cover, and wetland resources. The replacement riparian, SRA cover, or wetland habitat should consist of locally occurring native species.

Ź Policy NCR-2.14 Public Areas. The City shall ensure that public access and recreation facilities do not eliminate or degrade riparian habitat values. Trails, picnic areas, and other improvements shall be sited to minimize impacts on sensitive wildlife habitat or riparian vegetation.

4.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Ź Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Require appropriate treatment for inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources. The City will require, through permit or tentative map conditions or contractual obligations, that in the event of any inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources, all such finds will be subject to PRC 21083.2 and State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5. Procedures for inadvertent discovery are listed below. x All work within 100 feet of the find will be halted until a professional archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find in accordance with NRHP and CRHR criteria. x If any find is determined to be significant by the archaeologist, representatives of the City will meet with the archaeologist to determine the appropriate course of action. If necessary, a Treatment Plan will be prepared by an archeologist, outlining recovery of the resource, analysis, and reporting of the find. The Treatment Plan will be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to resuming construction. x All significant cultural materials recovered will be subject to scientific analysis, professional curation, and a report prepared by the professional archaeologist according to current professional standards.

In the event of the discovery of a previously unknown TCR inadvertently exposed or impacted during project implementation, a qualified archaeologist with expertise in TCR in the area will be retained by the project applicant to assess the discovery and provide mitigation recommendations as necessary. Such recommendations shall be reviewed in consultation with the impacted California Native American Tribe. When a project will impact a known TCR and avoidance is not a feasible option, a qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American Tribe, shall evaluate the eligibility of the site for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources according to the criteria in Public Resources Code Section 21074. If the TCR is found to be a historical resource as Public Resources 869
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 4-5 CEQA Consistency Analysis
Code Section 5024.1(c) and considering the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21074, the qualified archaeologist shall recommend further mitigative treatment, which may include avoidance or preservation in place. Data recovery on a TCR, if necessary to support the historic resources evaluation, shall only be conducted in accordance with cultural practices and the written consent of the Tribe.

4.5 NOISE
Ź Policy S-7.10 Acoustical Study. The City shall require new development that has the potential to generate noise that will exceed the levels contained in Tables S-7.1 through Table S-7.4 and may affect a noise sensitive use to prepare an acoustical study. The acoustical study shall:
• Be prepared by a qualified person experienced in the fields of environmental noise assessment and architectural acoustics; the person preparing the acoustical study shall consult with Planning Department staff to review specific issues or circumstances prior to commencing the study; • Provide a general description of the project and the noise sources of concern; appropriate maps shall be included;
• Describe the methodology that will be used to assess noise impacts. If computer models are to be used for noise predictions, they should be standard versions approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Caltrans, or other government agencies; 870

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 4-6 City of West Sacramento
• Include representative noise level measurements with sufficient sampling periods and locations to adequately describe local conditions and predominant noise sources; • Estimate existing and projected noise levels and compare those levels to the adopted policies and standards of the Noise Element;
• Recommend appropriate mitigation to achieve compliance with the adopted policies and standards of the Noise Element; where feasible, noise mitigation measures should focus on site planning and project design solutions rather than the creation of noise barriers; mitigation measures must be written with specific mitigation needed, and include any proposed follow-up noise monitoring if needed; and • Estimate noise exposure after the prescribed mitigation measures have been implemented.

4.6 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Ź Natural and Cultural Resources Implementation Program 25: The City shall require that when any subsurface cultural resources, paleontological resources, or human remains are encountered, all work within 100 feet of the discovery be stopped and the area protected from further disturbance until the discovery is evaluated. The resources shall be evaluated by qualified personnel to determine their significance and develop appropriate measures to avoid or protect valuable resources.

Ź Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Require appropriate treatment for inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources. The City will require, through permit or tentative map conditions or contractual obligations, that in the event of any inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources, all such finds will be subject to PRC 21083.2 and State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5. Procedures for inadvertent discovery are listed below. • All work within 100 feet of the find will be halted until a professional archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find in accordance with NRHP and CRHR criteria. • If any find is determined to be significant by the archaeologist, representatives of the City will meet with the archaeologist to determine the appropriate course of action. If necessary, a Treatment Plan will be prepared by an archeologist, outlining recovery of the resource, analysis, and reporting of the find. The Treatment Plan will be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to resuming construction. • All significant cultural materials recovered will be subject to scientific analysis, professional curation, and a report prepared by the professional archaeologist according to current professional standards.

Ź Mitigation Measure CUL-2b: Consistent with current state statutory and regulatory requirements, invite consultation from traditionally and culturally affiliated Native American Tribal representatives, assess impacts, and reduce or avoid adverse impacts to significant archaeological resources, 871
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 4-7 CEQA Consistency Analysis
including those which are tribal cultural sources or are associated with a tribal cultural resource. The City will invite consultation from traditionally and culturally affiliated Native American Tribal representatives that have requested consultation for both public and private projects that are subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), consistent with current state statutory and regulatory requirements. The City will provide information about the project and its location, and specifically invite traditionally and culturally affiliated Native American Tribal representatives to provide information about known archaeological or tribal cultural resources that could be affected by proposed projects and recommendation for mitigation that would avoid or reduce potential impacts to such resources. The City will require projects subject to CEQA that have the potential for adverse impacts to potentially significant archaeological resources, including those which are tribal cultural sources or are associated with a tribal cultural resource, to assess impacts and provide feasible mitigation. Based on the assessment, recommendations may include but are not limited to additional studies to evaluate identified sites or archaeological monitoring at locations determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes to be sensitive for subsurface cultural resource deposits. If no archeological resources, including those which are tribal cultural sources or are associated with a tribal cultural source, are identified that may be directly or indirectly impacted by project activities, mitigation is complete. In the event of the discovery of a previously unknown archaeological site inadvertently exposed during project implementation. In such an event, a qualified archaeologist will be retained to assess the discovery and provide management recommendations as necessary. When a project will impact a known archaeological site, including those determined to be a tribal cultural source, and avoidance is not a feasible option, a qualified archaeologist, in consultation with traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes, shall evaluate the eligibility of the site for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. If the archaeological site is found to be a historical resource as per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)(3), the qualified archaeologist shall recommend further mitigative treatment, which could include preservation in place or data recovery. If significant archaeological resources that meet the definition of historical or unique archaeological resources, including those determined to be tribal cultural resources, are identified in the project area, the preferred mitigation of impacts is preservation in place. If impacts cannot feasibly be avoided through project design, appropriate and feasible treatment measures are required, which may consist of, but are not limited to actions, such as data recovery excavations. If only part of a site will be impacted by a project, data recovery will only be necessary for that portion of the site. Data recovery will not be required if the implementing agency determines prior testing, and studies have adequately recovered the scientifically consequential information from the resources. 872

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 4-8 City of West Sacramento
This page left intentionally blank
873
Grand Gateway Zoning District AECOM
City of West Sacramento 5-1 CEQA Consistency Analysis
5 REFERENCES
AECOM. 2023. City of West Sacramento General Plan 2035 Mobility Element and Bridge District Specific Plan Update, Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. State Clearinghouse No. 2022070293.

Available: https://www.cityofwestsacramento.org/government/departments/communitydevelopment/planning-division/general-plan-2035/general-plan-updates. Accessed July 22, 2024.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2024. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. Available:
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/03beab8511814e79a0e4eabf0d3e7247/. Accessed July 22, 2024.

California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. 2024. SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details, Yolo County Central Landfill (57-AA-0001). Available:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/689?siteID=4033. Accessed July 28, 2024.

City of West Sacramento. 2016. City of West Sacramento 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. ______. 2023. Updated General Plan Mobility Element and Bridge District Specific Plan. Available:
https://www.cityofwestsacramento.org/government/departments/community-development/planningdivision/general-plan-2035/general-plan-updates. Accessed July 22, 2024 ———. 2024. Levee Projects. Available: https://www.cityofwestsacramento.org/government/departments/citymanager-s-office/flood-protection/levee-projects-overview. Accessed July 25, 2024.

Geomatrix Consultants. 2004. Site Investigation Report and No Further Action Request, Golden Eagle Express, 800 Delta Lane, West Sacramento, California. Geomatrix Project No. 9226.001. Oakland, CA.

GRIBI Associates. 2010. Brownfield Site Cleanup Plan, 820-824 West Capitol Avenue, West Sacramento, California. Benecia, CA.

Gutierrez, C.I. 2011. Preliminary Geologic Map of the Sacramento 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, California. California Geological Survey. Sacramento, CA.

ICF International. 2016. City of West Sacramento General Plan 2035 Update, Draft Environmental Impact Report.

State Clearinghouse No. 2014042087. Available:
https://www.cityofwestsacramento.org/government/departments/community-development/planningdivision/general-plan-2035. Accessed July 22, 2024.

O’Neal, M.D. and F.W. Gius. 2018. Mineral Land Classification: Concrete Aggregate In The Greater Sacramento Area Production-Consumption Region. Special Report 245. California Geological Survey. Sacramento, CA.

Opticos Design, Inc. 2013. Grand Gateway Master Plan. Available:
https://www.cityofwestsacramento.org/government/departments/community-development/planningdivision/planning-documents. Accessed July 22, 2024.

State Water Resources Control Board. 2024. GeoTracker. Available: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/.

Accessed July 25, 2024.
874

AECOM Grand Gateway Zoning District
CEQA Consistency Analysis 5-2 City of West Sacramento
This page left intentionally blank
875
1 DĂƌĐŚ 202ϰ

PURPOSE
Complete this form to report coverage under the Yolo Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (Yolo HCP/NCCP) as a Permittee. Chapter 4 of the Permitting Guide, available on the Yolo Habitat Conservancy’s (“Conservancy”) web site under the “Permitting” tab, provides instructions for form completion. The form requirements are minimum requirements; the Conservancy may request more information to clarify or complete the form. Submittal of a preliminary reporting form to the Conservancy is encouraged to ensure timely and accurate completion. If an application fee is required (see Screening Form, Box Y), the Permittee should submit this fee to the Conservancy early in the application process. The Permitting Guide and additional resources are available on the Conservancy’s web site under the “Permitting” tab. The Conservancy automatically adjusts mitigation fees on or around March 15th of each year to reflect current land prices and other expenses. If an applicant does not complete their application and issue payment prior to the fee update, the new fees will apply. The applicant may, however, pay mitigation fees early at the previous year’s rate consistent with the Conservancy’s Early Payment of Migitation Fees Policy.

Regional-scale data related land cover, sensitive natural communities, and covered species habitats in Yolo is made available through the Yolo HCP/NCCP GeoMapper online mapping tool. The GeoMapper tool is accessible via the Resources tab of the Yolo Habitat Conservancy website identified below, although it is intended for informational purposes only. All HCP/NCCP permit applicants must have site-specific planning level surveys by a qualified biologist to determine actual land cover and sensitive natural communities and species habitats in and around a project site to determine the correct amount of land cover mitigation fees and project specific Avoidance and Minimization Measures (AMMs).
https://www.yolohabitatconservancy.org/resources
BOX A: Preliminary/Final Application Form
Check one box.

Preliminary Form (signature not required) Final Form (complete form and signature required) BOX B: APPLICATION DETAILS
1 Project name
2 Submittal date
3 Member agency internal tracking
number
4 YHC internal tracking #
5 Member agency Yolo County
City of Davis
City of Woodland
City of West Sacramento
City of Winters

REPORTING FORM
Grand Gateway Master Plan Area
September 27th, 2024
876

YOLO HCP/NCCP REPORTING FORM

FOR MEMBER AGENCY PROJECTS
2 DĂƌĐŚ 202ϰ
BOX C: MEMBER AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
1 Member agency

1.a Member agency name

1.b Mailing address

1.c Phone (home/office) 1.d Phone (Cellular)

1.e Email
BOX D: PROJECT INFORMATION
1 Project address and location
2 Assessor parcel number(s)
APNs and acreage by parcel
(not applicable for linear
projects)
3 Total acreage of parcel(s)
(not applicable for linear
projects)
4 Using the GeoMapper’s
Spatially Defined Planning
Unit Map, find your proposed
project site. Check the
Planning Unit in which your
project lies.

Yolo County Planning Units
1 – Little Blue Ridge
2 – North Blue Ridge
3 – South Blue Ridge
4 – Capay Hills
5 – Dunnigan Hills
6 – Upper Cache Creek
7 – Lower Cache Creek
8 – Upper Putah Creek
9 – Lower Putah Creek
10 – Hungry Hollow Basin
11 – Willow Slough Basin
12 – Colusa Basin
13 – Colusa Basin Plains
14 – North Yolo Basin
15 – South Yolo Basin
16 – Yolo Basin Plains
17 – North Yolo Bypass
18 – South Yolo Bypass
Cities
19 – City of Woodland
20 – City of Davis
21 – City of West Sacramento
22 – City of Winters
5 Provide a project description. Please refer to the Permitting Guide for details to include in the project description. Label as Attachment 1 or indicate in this box the document name and page numbers of the report where this information can be found, and attach report or relevant excerpts. 6 Provide a legible vicinity map of the project site and surrounding area (PDF). Refer to the Permitting Guide for more information about details to include on the vicinity map. Label as Attachment 2. Rather than a separate PDF, applicant may include the site plan in the planning level survey report or other report.

If so, provide report name and page number here, and attach report or relevant excerpts:
7 Provide a site plan that shows the proposed project site and surrounding area. (PDF and CAD or GIScompatible). Refer to the Permitting Guide (Page 7-2) for more information about details to include in the site plan. Label as Attachment 3. Rather than a separate PDF, applicant may include the site plan in the planning level survey report or other report. if so, provide report name and page number here, and attach report or relevant excerpt:

David W. Tilley
825 Tower Bridge Gateway, West Sacramento, CA 95691
(916) 617-4661
[email protected]
811 West Capitol Ave, 815 West Capitol Ave, 817 West Capitol Ave, 820 West Capitol Ave, 824 West Capitol Ave, 826 West Capitol Ave 067-330-017 (partial), 067-330-017 (partial), 067-320-007, 088- 150-067, 008-150-066, 008-150-033

8.6 acres
877

YOLO HCP/NCCP REPORTING FORM

FOR MEMBER AGENCY PROJECTS
DĂƌĐŚ202ϰ 3
BOX E: NATURAL COMMUNITY AND LAND COVER IMPACTS AND MITIGATION FEES Complete Items 1-26 below, referring to the Permitting Guide for calculation methods. x Total fee amount for each land cover type will be auto-generated based on acreage amount (and for recurring temporary impacts, number of years out of the 50-year permit term the impact will occur).
x Temporary impact fee formula = land cover fee x area of temporary effect in acres x (F/50) where F = the number of years in which the activity will occur during the rest of the permit term (until 2069).
x Must include required land cover fee buffer area associated with the project. This is generally 10 feet for linear projects (e.g. roads, utility FRUULGRUV, pipelines) and 50 feet for all other projects. See Chapter 4 of the Permitting Guide under Box E instructions regarding the option of lumping land cover categories for the fee buffer calculations for linear projects. x Fees will be updated annually, typically mid-March.x Wetland fees are in addition to land cover fees.

Submit a planning-level survey, including a field-verified land cover map and the name and qualifications of the qualified biologist(s) responsible for preparation of the report. Label as Attachment 4. Mapped areas shown on the site plan (Attachment 3 in Box D, Item 7) should be consistent with the acreages enteredbelow. Include photographs of temporary impact areas. Label photos as Attachment 5.

Land Cover Types
Land Cover Permanently Impacted by
Project (in acres)
Land Cover
Temporarily
Impacted by
Project
(in acres)
Years of
Recurring
Temporary
Impact
Fees (Auto Generated)
Land
Cover Fee
(per acre)
Wetland
Fee
(per acre)
Permanent
Impact,
Land
Cover Fee
Temporary
Impact,
Land Cover
Fee
Wetland
Fee Permanent
Impact (acres)
Fee Buffer
(acres) TOTAL
1 Developed (including
ruderal with no covered species habitat)a
$0 $0 $ $ $
2 Ruderal with covered
species habitata
$1
$0 $ $ $
3 Barren, No Covered
Species Habitat
$0 $0 $ $ $
4 Barren, With Covered
Species Habitat

$0 $ $ $
5 Vegetated Corridor with
Covered Species Habitat

$0 $ $ $
6 Grassland (all types)
$0 $ $ $ 7 Alkali Prairie
$0 $ $ $ 8 Fresh Emergent Wetland
(all types)

$
, $ $ $
9 Valley Foothill Riparian

$ $ $

8.6 7.8 16.4 0.0 0

0.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.00

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00

0.00 0.000.000.000.000.000.00

0.00 0.00

0.000.000.000.000.000.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
878

YOLO HCP/NCCP REPORTING FORM

FOR MEMBER AGENCY PROJECTS
DĂƌĐŚ 202ϰ 4
Land Cover Types
Land Cover Permanently Impacted by
Project (in acres)
Land Cover
Temporarily
Impacted by
Project
(in acres)
Years of
Recurring
Temporary
Impact
Fees (Auto Generated)
Land
Cover Fee
(per acre)
Wetland
Fee
(per acre)
Permanent
Impact,
Land
Cover Fee
Temporary
Impact,
Land Cover
Fee
Wetland
Fee Permanent
Impact (acres)
Fee Buffer
(acres) TOTAL
10 Lacustrine and Riverine
$ $ $ $ 11 Cultivated Land (all types)
$0 $ $ $ 12 Citrus/Subtropical
$0 $ $ $ 13 Deciduous Fruits/Nuts
$0 $ $ $ 14 Vineyards
$0 $ $ $ 15 Turf Farm
$0 $ $ $ 16 Flowers/Nursery/Tree
Farms

$0 $ $ $
17 Semiag/Incidental to
Agriculture
$0 $ $ $
18 Eucalyptus
$0 $ $ $ 19 Linear buffers (combine
non-fee-paying land cover types)
N/A N/A N/A $0 $0
20 Linear buffers (combine
fee-paying land cover typesb)
N/A N/A N/A
$0
TOTAL: TOTAL:
21 TOTAL LAND COVER IMPACTS AND MITIGATION FEES $ 22 APPLICATION FEE (The application fee is credited towards the cost of the mitigation fees if the application fee is paid prior to the submittal of the mitigation fee payment .

Application fee as of January 1, 2020: $1,981)
$
23 OTHER CREDITS
(Advanced fee payment or in lieu fee credit – must be verified by Conservancy). Add Attachment 6 $
24 TOTAL LAND COVER IMPACTS AND MITIGATION FEES DUE
(Mitigation fees due are determined at the time of payment unless they were paid in accordance with the Yolo HCP/NCCP Early Payment of Mitigation Fees Policy. See www.yolohabitatconservancy.org for current fee schedule.) $
a Land cover fees may be applicable if covered species habitat is present. b Fresh Emergent Wetland, Valley Foothill Riparian, and Lacustrine and Riverine land cover types cannot be lumped with other land cover types and must be entered in the fee buffer columns. $ $ $
$ $
$ $
$ $ 8.60 7.77 16.37 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

0.000.00

0.00 0.00

0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00

0.000.000.00

0.000.00

0.000.000.000.00

0.000.000.000.000.000.00

0.0 0.0 0.00

0.000.00

0.00 879

YOLO HCP/NCCP REPORTING FORM

FOR MEMBER AGENCY PROJECTS
5 DĂƌĐŚ202ϰ
BOX F: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: CONDUCT PLANNING LEVEL SURVEYS Based on a planning level survey conducted by a qualified biologist using the land cover definitions described in the Permitting Guide in Table 2-1, indicate which sensitive natural communities and covered species are relevant to your project. Indicate below whether suitable covered species habitats are present (Column A) and, where applicable, if there is a need to conduct a preconstruction survey, a more focused survey(s) for covered species (Column B) to confirm presence. Complete species-specific planning level survey as needed consistent with protocols provided in Appendix A of the Permitting Guide. Alternatively, covered species presence can be assumed, which would requires adherence to applicable AMMs and implementation of avoidance measures or pre-construction surveys. Attach all species-specific planning level surveys as Attachment 6. Describe, map, and tabulate impacts the project will have on each natural community and each species for which habitat is present. Impact calculations must correspond to the permanent and temporary impact calculations in Box E. Label as Attachment 7.

Alternatively, the impact assessment can be incorporated into the planning level survey. Important: Be aware of the timing requirements for conducting a species-specific planning-level survey (Table 6-1 in the Permitting Guide) to avoid project delays.

A. Project Site Conditions Requiring PlanningLevel SurveyB. Species-Specific Planning Level
Survey Results
C. Documentation
Sensitive Natural Communities
1 Alkali prairie
and vernal
pool complex
Are vernal pools or alkali seasonal wetlands
present within 250 feet of project footprint?
Yes. Design project to avoid vernal pools
or alkali seasonal wetlands by 250 feet or
lesser buffer if approved by wildlife
agencies. Check Box G, AMMs 9 and 10.

Go to Column C.

No
N/A Map attached? (Attachment 4
or 6?)
Yes
No
If vernal pools or alkali
seasonal wetlands are present
on or near the site, provide
map showing how project
avoids these wetlands.
2 Valley foothill
riparian
Is valley foothill riparian present within 100 feet
of the project site boundary?
Yes. Design project to avoid valley foothill
riparian by 100 feet or count all portions
within 100 feet in the impact acreage (see
Permitting Guide Table 2-1). Check Box G,
AMMs 9 and 10. Go to Column C and
provide map.

No
N/A Map attached? (Attachment 4
or 6?)
Yes
No
Provide map showing the
valley foothill riparian in
relation to the project footprint.
3 Lacustrine
and riverine
Are any streams, rivers, lakes, or ponds within
25 feet of project footprint inside urban planning
units, or within 100 feet of project footprint
outside urban planning units?
Yes. Design project to avoid these
resources by 25 feet inside urban planning
units or 100 feet outside urban planning
units, or count all portions within these
distances in the impact acreage, unless a
variance is allowed. Check Box G, AMMs 9
and 10. Go to Column C and provide map.

No
N/A Map attached? (Attachment 4
or 6?)
Yes
No
Provide map showing any
streams, rivers, lakes, or
ponds in relation to the project
footprint.
880

YOLO HCP/NCCP REPORTING FORM

FOR MEMBER AGENCY PROJECTS
6 DĂƌĐŚ 202ϰ
BOX F: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: CONDUCT PLANNING LEVEL SURVEYS A. Project Site Conditions Requiring PlanningLevel SurveyB. Species-Specific Planning Level Survey
Results
C. Documentation
Sensitive Natural Communities
4 Fresh
emergent
wetlands
Are there any fresh emergent wetlands within
50 feet of project footprint outside urban
planning units?
Yes. Design project to avoid these
resources by 50 feet, or count all portions
within 50 feet in the impact acreage. Check
Box G, AMMs 9 and 10. Go to Column C
and provide map). Survey period: May
31–September 30
No
N/A Map attached?
(Attachment 4 or 6?)
Yes
No
Provide map of fresh
emergent wetlands in
relation to the project
footprint.

Plants
5 Palmatebracted bird’s
beak
Is suitable habitat present within 250 feet of the
project site boundary?
Yes. Survey for palmate-bracted bird’s
beak consistent with Permitting Guide
Appendix A. Check Box G, AMM 11. Go to
Column B. Survey period: May 31–
September 30
No
Is palmate-bracted bird’s
beak present?
Yes. Design project
to avoid occupied
habitat as described
in AMM 11. Go to
Column C.

No. Go to Column C.

Species-Specific PlanningLevel Survey attached?
(Attachment 6)
Yes
No
Include Species-Specific
Planning-Level Survey and
map of habitat and any
plants found in relation to
project footprint.

Invertebrates
6 Valley
elderberry
longhorn
beetle
Is there presence of elderberry shrubs in the
project site or within 100 feet outside of the
project site boundary that could be impacted by
the project?
Yes. Identify and map all elderberry shrubs
in and within 100 feet of project footprint
with stems greater than one inch in
diameter at ground level. For mapped
shrubs that cannot be avoided, quantify the
number of stems greater than one inch in
diameter at ground level, and identify any
such stems with valley elderberry longhorn
beetle exit holes. Check Box G, AMM 12.

Go to Column C and provide survey report.

Survey period: Year-round
No
N/A Species-Specific PlanningLevel Survey attached?
(Attachment 6)
Yes
No
881

YOLO HCP/NCCP REPORTING FORM

FOR MEMBER AGENCY PROJECTS
7 DĂƌĐŚ 202ϰ
BOX F: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: CONDUCT PLANNING LEVEL SURVEYS A. Project Site Conditions Requiring PlanningLevel SurveyB. Species-Specific Planning Level Survey
Results
C. Documentation
Amphibians
7 California
tiger
salamander
Is there presence of California tiger salamander
aquatic or upland habitat in the project footprint,
or aquatic habitat within 500 feet of the project
footprint?
Yes. Check box G, AMM 13. Is the habitat
within designated critical habitat for
California tiger salamander, as determined
using the GeoMapper?
Yes. Design project to avoid
designated critical habitat.

No. If aquatic habitat cannot be
avoided by 500 feet, either conduct
surveys as described in the Permitting
Guide Appendix A, or assume species
presence. Survey period: After
rainfall, November 1 to May 15. Go
to Column B.

No
Are California tiger
salamanders present or
assumed to be present in
aquatic habitat?
Yes. If the species is
present or assumed
to be present, the
Yolo HCP/NCCP will
not allow any loss of
occupied aquatic
habitat until at least
four new occupied
breeding pools are
discovered or
established and
protected in the Plan
Area. Contact Yolo
Habitat Conservancy.

Go to Column C.

No
Species-Specific PlanningLevel Survey attached?
(Attachment 6)
Yes
No
Reptiles
8 Western
pond turtle
Is western pond turtle habitat present in the
project footprint?
Yes. Check Box G, AMM 14. A qualified
biologist is required to evaluate whether
there is moderate to high likelihood of
western pond turtle presence. Go to
Columns B and C.

No
Moderate to high
likelihood of western pond
turtle presence?
Yes: Check Box F for
western pond turtle
Pre-construction
surveys.

No
Habitat evaluation
attached? (Attachment 6)
Yes
No
9 Giant garter
snake
Is there any giant garter snake habitat within
the project footprint?
Yes. Design project to avoid or minimize
impact on giant garter snake habitat to the
extent practicable. If habitat cannot be
avoided, see AMM 15. Check Box F for
giant garter snake Pre-construction
surveys, and check Box G, AMM 15.

N/A N/A
882

YOLO HCP/NCCP REPORTING FORM

FOR MEMBER AGENCY PROJECTS
8 DĂƌĐŚϮϬϮϰ
BOX F: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: CONDUCT PLANNING LEVEL SURVEYS A. Project Site Conditions Requiring PlanningLevel SurveyB. Species-Specific Planning Level Survey
Results
C. Documentation
Birds
10 Swainson’s
hawk and
white-tailed
kite
Are there suitable Swainson’s hawk or whitetailed kite nest trees within 1,320 feet of the project footprint?
Yes. If nest trees cannot be avoided by
1,320 feet, check Box F for hawk and kite
Pre-construction surveys, and Box G, AMM

16. No

N/A N/A
11 Western
yellow-billed
cuckoo
Is suitable habitat present within 500 feet of the
project site boundary?
Yes. If there are breeding records for the
western yellow-billed cuckoo within ¼ mile
of the project site from the previous three
years (as determined by GeoMapper), then
assume species is present. If there are no
breeding records with ¼ mile, then either
assume species is present or survey
consistent with Chapter 6 of the Permitting
Guide. See columns B and C. Check Box F
for western yellow-billed cuckoo Preconstruction surveys and Check Box G, AMM 17.

Survey period: June 1–August 30.

No
Is western yellow-billed
cuckoo present or
assumed to be present?
Yes. If project cannot
avoid occupied
habitat by 500 feet,
avoid take of nesting
birds as described in
AMM 17.

No.

Species-Specific PlanningLevel Survey attached?
(Attachment 6)
Yes
No
12 Western
burrowing
owl
Is western burrowing owl habitat present on
the project site, or within 500 feet of the project
site?
Yes. Conduct planning-level surveys for
occupied habitat as described in Permitting
Guide Appendix A. Go to Columns B and
C. Survey period: February 1–August 31
during the breeding season; September
1–January 31 during nonbreeding
season.

No
Are burrowing owls
present?
Yes. Check Box G,
AMM18. If burrows
cannot be avoided,
consistent with
Permitting Guide
Chapter 5, Check Box
F for western
burrowing owl Preconstruction surveys.

No
Species-Specific PlanningLevel Survey attached?
(Attachment 6)
Yes
No
883

YOLO HCP/NCCP REPORTING FORM

FOR MEMBER AGENCY PROJECTS
9 DĂƌĐŚ202ϰ
BOX F: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: CONDUCT PLANNING LEVEL SURVEYS A. Project Site Conditions Requiring PlanningLevel SurveyB. Species-Specific Planning Level Survey
Results
C. Documentation
13 Least Bell’s
vireo
Is least Bell’s vireo habitat present in and within
500 feet of project footprint?
Yes. Check Box G, AMM 19. Are there
nesting records for the species within ¼
mile of the site from the previous three
years (determined using the GeoMapper)?
Yes. Assume species is present. See
Column B.

No. Conduct planning-level surveys,
as described in Permitting Guide
Appendix A. See Columns B and C.

Survey period: April 1–July 15
No
Are least Bell’s vireo nests
present or assumed to be
present?
Yes. Check Box F for
least Bell’s vireo Preconstruction surveys.

Avoid take of birds as
described in AMM 19.

No.

Species –Specific
Planning-Level Survey
attached? (Attachment 6)
Yes
No
14 Bank swallow Is bank swallow nesting habitat present on the project site, or within 500 feet of the project
site?
Yes. Check Box G, AMM 20. Conduct
planning-level surveys as described in
Permitting Guide Appendix A. Go to
Columns B and C. Survey period: March
1–August 15
No
Are nesting bank
swallows present?
Yes. Check Box F for
bank swallow Preconstruction surveys.

Avoid take of birds as
described in AMM 19.

No.

Species-Specific PlanningLevel Survey attached?
(Attachment 6)
Yes
No
15 Tricolored
blackbird
Is tricolored blackbird nesting habitat present
on the project site, or within 1,300 feet of the
project site?
Yes. Conduct planning-level surveys as
described in Permitting Guide Appendix A.

Check Box G, AMM 21. Go to Column C.

Survey period: March 1–July 30
No
N/A Species-Specific PlanningLevel Survey attached?
(Attachment 6)
Yes
No
BOX G: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: CONDUCT PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS Indicate which species in Items 1-7 are relevant to your project. Important: Refer to Chapter 4 of the Permitting Guide for information about survey purpose, the land cover types and site conditions requiring pre-construction surveys, survey area size, and survey timing.

Birds
1 Swainson’s hawk 4 Western burrowing owl
2 White-tailed kite 5 Least Bell’s vireo
3 Western yellow-billed cuckoo
Reptiles
6 Giant garter snake 7 Western pond turtle
884

YOLO HCP/NCCP REPORTING FORM

FOR MEMBER AGENCY PROJECTS
10 DĂƌĐŚ 202ϰ
BOX H: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION MEASURES (AMMs) Check the avoidance and minimization measures below that apply to your project. Refer to the Permitting Guide for assistance. Describe how you will fulfill the requirements of each required condition. Plan your construction carefully around the translocation or other dates required by the AMMs. Label as Attachment 8. 1 AMM1: Establish Resource Protection Buffers
2 AMM 2: Design Developments to Minimize Indirect Effects at Urban-Habitat Interfaces (this AMM does not apply to new development where it is immediately adjacent to existing developed lands) 3 AMM 3: Confine and Delineate Work Area
4 AMM 4: Cover Trenches and Holes during Construction and Maintenance 5 AMM 5: Control Fugitive Dust
6 AMM 6: Conduct Worker Training
7 AMM 7: Control Nighttime Lighting of Project Construction Sites 8 AMM 8: Avoid and Minimize Effects of Construction Staging Areas and Temporary Work Areas 9 AMM 9: Establish Resource Protection Buffers around Sensitive Natural Communities 10 AMM 10: Avoid and Minimize Effects on Wetlands and Waters 11 AMM 11: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Palmate-Bracted Bird’s Beak 12 AMM 12: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Habitat of Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle 13 AMM 13: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Habitat of California Tiger Salamander 14 AMM 14: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Habitat of Western Pond Turtle 15 AMM 15: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Habitat of Giant Garter Snake 16 AMM 16: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Habitat of Swainson’s Hawk and White-Tailed Kite 17 AMM 17: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Habitat of Western Yellow-Billed Cuckoo 18 AMM 18: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Western Burrowing Owl 19 AMM 19: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Least Bell’s Vireo 20 AMM 20: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Habitat of Bank Swallow 21 AMM 21: Minimize Take and Adverse Effects on Habitat of Tricolored Blackbird BOX I: ATTACHMENT CHECKLIST
Indicate which attachments are provided below. Note: Attachments must meet the requirements described in Permitting Guide. If these requirements are not met, your application may be delayed.

All Projects
Attachment 1. Project Description (Box C). Attach separately or indicate attached report page #s here:

Attachment 2. Vicinity map PDF (Box C). Attach separately or indicate report page # here:

Attachment 3. Site Plan (Box C). Attach separately or indicate report page # here:
885

YOLO HCP/NCCP REPORTING FORM

FOR MEMBER AGENCY PROJECTS
11 DĂƌĐŚ202ϰ
BOX I: ATTACHMENT CHECKLIST
Projects with Impacts
Attachment 4. Planning level survey (Box D)
Attachment 5. Photos of temporary impact areas. Attach separately or indicate report page #s here:

Attachment 6. Species-specific planning level survey(s) (Box E). Attach separately or indicate report page #s here:

Attachment 7. Unavoidable impacts on covered species. Attach separately or indicate report page #s here:

Attachment 8. Description of compliance with Avoidance and Minimization Measures (Box G). Attach separately or indicate report page #s here:

BOX J: SIGNATURES
By checking the box and signing below I certify all information in the application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify I understand the requirements of the AMMs, including dates for elderberry translocation or other dates that may affect construction timing. 1 Member agency contact
name and contact
information
Name
Phone Email
2 Member agency signature Date

FORM SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Submit this form electronically to the Yolo Habitat Conservancy at the PO Box provided below. Provide a copy to the applicable planning office contact below, for informational purposes.

LOCAL AGENCY PLANNING OFFICE CONTACT INFORMATION
Yolo County
Stephanie Cormier
Planning Division
Department of
Community
Services
292 West Beamer
Street, Woodland
(530) 666-8041
City of West
Sacramento
David Tilley
Community Development
Department
1110 West Capitol Ave.,
2nd Floor, West
Sacramento
(916) 617-4645
City of Davis
Sherri Metzker
Community
Development &
Sustainability
23 Russell Blvd., Suite
2, Davis
(530) 757-5610 ext.
7239
City of
Woodland
Cindy Norris
Planning
Division
300 First Street,
Woodland
(530) 661-5911
City of Winters
.LUN6NLHUVNL
Community
Development
Department
318 First Street,
Winters
(530) 794-6714

YOLO HABITAT CONSERVANCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Address: PO Box 2202, Woodland, CA 95776 Phone: 530-666-850 Email: [email protected] N/A, see Attachment 4 pages 13 - 23 for species potential to occur tables Attachment 4, pages 7 and 8
N/A
886
"55"$).&/51SPKFDU%FTDSJQUJPO
887
1 6 45 NW H OYT STREET PORTL AND O REGO N 97 2 09 50 3 44 4 22 00 WW W.C2 KARCH.COM June 26, 2024
City of West Sacramento
Community Development Department
1110 West Capitol Ave
West Sacramento, CA 95691
RE: West Sacramento Grand Gateway – Project Description The following provides a Project Description of the proposed West Sacramento Grand Gateway project.

Project Applicant:

SKK Developments
Marisa Kolokotronis
[email protected]
(916)449-8989
2409 L Street, Ste 200
Sacramento, CA 95816
Project Location and APNs:

The total project site is 8.6 acres, spread over four development blocks located at the intersection of West Capitol Ave and Grand Street. The project’s frontage also includes 7th Street and Tower Bridge Gateway.

Development Block 1 (DB1) is 2.84 acres, and includes the following three parcels:
o Parcel ID A: 008-150-033; Address: 826 West Capitol Ave o Parcel ID B: 008-150-066; Address: 824 West Capitol Ave o Parcel ID C: 088-150-067; Address: 820 West Capitol Ave Development Block 2 (DB2) is 1.82 acres, and includes the following parcel:
o Parcel ID D: 067-320-007; Address: 817 West Capitol Ave Development Block 3 (DB3) is 2.87 acres, and includes the following parcel:
o Parcel ID E: 067-330-017 (partial); Address: 817 West Capitol Ave Development Block 4 (DB4) is 1.07 acres, and includes the following two parcels:
o Parcel ID F: 067-330-017 (partial); Address: 815 West Capitol Ave o Parcel ID G: 067-330-002; Address: 811 West Capitol Ave 888
City of West Sacramento
June 26, 2024

Page 2 ends

West Sacramento City CouncilJanuary 15, 2025

West Sacramento City Council
January 15, 2025