Agenda packet — West Sacramento City Council, April 15, 2026 (part 4 of 9)

On March 18, 2026, the City Council held a public hearing on the omnibus zoning code amendments. There were no public comments on the item. The City Council had no questions for staff on the item. Following the public hearing, the City Council decided to vote 4-0 to approve staff’s recommendation.

ANALYSIS
The Municipal Code amendments address legal compliance, administrative efficiency, community transparency, housing production, and clarity in development standards. Incorporating them into the omnibus code update provides a comprehensive improvement package that modernizes the Municipal Code and supports Counciladopted housing, equity, and process improvement objectives. Bold/underline text reflects proposed additions to the existing code, while language proposed for deletion is noted in strikeout text.

1. Chapter 8.18.040 (Definitions) – Amending the definition of hazardous materials.

Hazardous materials.
“Hazardous materials” mean those chemicals or substances which are physical hazards or health hazards as defined and classified in Chapter 27 of the CFC, whether the materials are in usable or waste condition.

Summary: Every three years the California Building Standards Code updates to a newer version in an effort to incorporate nationally recognized code development and changes. The minor edit to the hazardous materials definition in Municipal Code section 8.18.040 reflects a restructuring of chapters in the California Fire Code (CFC).

2. Chapter 17.09.020 - Allowing Low Barrier Navigation Centers in Commercial and Mixed Use Zones TABLE 17.09.020: LAND USE REGULATIONS—COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES "P" = Permitted use "C" = Conditional Use Permit required "M" = Minor Use Permit required "-" Use not allowed
Use Classification CBD C CH MU-NC MU-C WF Additional Regulations Residential Uses
Low Barrier Navigation Center P P - P P P
Supportive Housing
Transitional Housing
Transitional and supportive housing constitute a residential use and are subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential uses of the same type in the same zone.

Specific Limitations:
(5) A Low Barrier Navigation Center shall comply with Government Code Sections 65660, 65664, and 65666
Summary: AB 101 (2019) requires Low Barrier Navigation Centers (LBNCs) to be a by-right use in areas zoned for mixed use and non-residential zones permitting multifamily uses if they meet specified requirements including access to permanent housing, use of a coordinated entry system, and use of Housing First according to Welfare and Institutions Code section 8255 (Gov. Code, § 65662). Updating this section ensures alignment with Housing 534
Omnibus Code Amendments
April 15, 2026

Page 3 ends

Element (HE) Program 6.4, California Government Code 65660-65668, and fair housing mandates. This revision is necessary for maintaining Housing and Community Development (HCD) compliance.

3. Chapter 17.22.030– Amending the language for Development on Lots divided by Zone Boundaries B. Exceptions. If more than 60% of a lot (as measured by lot area) is located in one zone, modifications to the provisions of this section may be granted through approval of a Conditional Use Permit. by the Zoning Administrator.

C. Appeals.

1. Any determination made pursuant to this section shall be subject to appeal in accordance with Chapter 17.35.130 (Appeals).

Summary: Properties that are divided between two zoning districts often involve minor or technical zoning issues, especially when much of the property is in one zone. Requiring a Conditional Use Permit in these cases can add time, cost, and complexity without improving the review or outcome of a project. Allowing the Zoning Administrator to make this determination provides a more practical and efficient way to apply zoning rules while still respecting the intent of the code. This amendment preserves existing appeal rights, ensuring transparency and accountability while making the process easier for applicants and staff.

4. Chapter 17.27.050(G) – Adding AB 2097 to Parking Reductions (G) California Assembly Bill (AB) 2097 (2022)
AB 2097 (Government Code section 65863.2) prohibits cities from enforcing minimum automobile parking requirements for residential, commercial, or other development projects located within onehalf (1/2) mile of "public transit," except in limited circumstances as detailed in subsection 2.

1. Definitions. For the purposes of subsection G, the following definitions shall apply:
i. "Housing development project" means a housing development project as defined in Government Code section 65589.5(h)(2).
ii. "Project" does not include a project where any portion is designated for use as a hotel, motel, bed and breakfast inn, or other transient lodging, except where a portion of a housing development project is designated for use as a residential hotel, as defined in Section 50519 of the Health and Safety Code. iii. "Public transit" means "major transit stop" as defined in Public Resources Code section 21155.
iv. Public Resources Code section 21155 defines "major transit stop" as "a major transit stop is as defined in Section 21064.3, except that, for purposes of this section, it also includes major transit stops that are included in the applicable regional transportation plan. For purposes of this section, a high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. A project shall be considered to be within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor if all parcels within the project have no more than 25 percent of their area farther than one-half mile from the stop or corridor and if not more than 10 percent of the residential units or 100 units, whichever is less, in the project are farther than onehalf mile from the stop or corridor." v. Public Resources Code section 21064.3 defines "major transit stop" as a site containing any of the following:
a. an existing rail or bus rapid transit station.
b. a ferry terminal served either by a bus or rail transit service. c. the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 20 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

Page 4 ends

i. The City's ability to meet its share of the regional housing need for low- and very low-income households;
ii. The City's ability to meet any special housing needs for the elderly or persons with disabilities identified in the analysis required pursuant to Government Code section 65583(a)(7); or
iii. Existing residential or commercial parking within one-half (1/2) mile of the housing development project.

3. For a housing development project, subparagraph 2 shall not apply if the housing development project satisfies all of the following:
i. The development dedicates a minimum of twenty percent (20%) of the total number of housing units to very low, low-, or moderate-income households, students, the elderly, or persons with disabilities.
ii. The development contains fewer than twenty (20) housing units. iii. The development is subject to parking reductions based on the provisions of any other applicable law.

Summary: AB 2097 (2022) prohibits cities from imposing minimum parking requirements within ½ mile of major transit stops. This law applies to major transit stops that exist and those that are planned and included in a regional transportation plan. This law also applies to both new construction and changes of use in existing buildings and structures. Incorporating this mandate directly into the code ensures legal compliance, eliminates internal contradictions, and provides clarity to applicants and staff during project review. Codification is essential to avoid CEQA challenges and ensure streamlined housing approvals consistent with State law.

5. Chapter 17.30.100(A)(2)(a) – Compliance with state law regarding parking minimums for emergency shelters a. Parking. Parking shall be provided in the ratio of one space for every 10 adult beds, plus an additional space designated exclusively for the manager. All parking shall be off street and on site. a. Parking. None beyond the parking required for the residential housing type; Summary: Several emergency shelter regulations predate recent Housing Element requirements. Updating this section ensures alignment with Housing Element (HE) Program 6.4, California Government Code 65660-65668, and fair housing mandates. This revision is critical for maintaining Housing and Community Development (HCD) compliance, protecting the City’s housing allocations, and avoiding legal exposure from outdated regulations.

6. Chapter 17.31.080 (Definitions) - Amending the definition of sign face Sign face. An exterior display surface of a sign, including non-structural trim, exclusive of the supporting structure. The area of a sign which is available for mounting and public display of the visually communicative image. Each face of the temporary sign shall count towards the square footage allowed.

Summary: The proposed amendment clarifies that each face of a temporary sign shall count toward the maximum allowable sign area. This clarification is intended to ensure that sign area limitations accurately reflect the total amount of signage displayed and the resulting visual impact. Without this standard, multi-faced or double-sided signs could effectively display more signage than intended by the Municipal Code while remaining technically compliant, undermining the purpose of temporary sign size limits. Counting each sign face toward the permitted square footage eliminates this inconsistency and ensures equitable treatment across all temporary sign types, including single-faced and double-faced signs. This approach also improves code clarity and enforceability by establishing an objective, easily measurable standard that can be consistently applied in the field.

7. Chapter 17.31.090 On-Site Temporary Signs – Adding General Requirement language as new subsection (A). The remainder of Section 17.31.090 is hereby re-lettered without substantive change. § 17.31.090 On-Site Temporary Signs.

A. General Requirements

1. Illumination. On-site temporary signs regulated in this subsection shall not be illuminated.

2. Other Prohibitions. All prohibitions stated in Chapter 17.29.050 shall apply to temporary signs. 536
Omnibus Code Amendments
April 15, 2026

Page 5 ends

Summary: The proposed amendment clarifies that temporary signs shall not be illuminated and that all signage prohibitions found in Chapter 17.29 (Signs) apply equally to temporary signs. Temporary signs are short-term and intended to provide limited, time-sensitive information. Allowing illumination would increase their visual prominence beyond what is appropriate for a temporary condition and could create adverse impacts on nearby residential uses, including light glare and nighttime visual clutter. Applying the sign prohibitions to temporary signs further ensures consistency across the sign code and avoids unintended loopholes where temporary signs could otherwise be installed in prohibited locations or configurations.

8. Chapter 17.31.110 – Adding Statement of Responsibility § 17.31.110 Statement of Responsibility
Every temporary sign located in a non-residential or commercial zone shall have a written corresponding statement of responsibility filed with the office of the City Clerk certifying a person who will be responsible for removing the sign and who will reimburse the City for any cost incurred to remove it, with such certification being made upon forms prepared by the City.

Summary: The proposed requirement for a Statement of Responsibility for temporary signs establishes clear accountability for the installation, maintenance, and timely removal of signage. Requiring a Statement of Responsibility ensures that an identified individual or entity accepts responsibility for the sign’s placement, condition, and removal in accordance with the Municipal Code. This requirement also strengthens the City’s ability to administer and enforce temporary sign regulations in a fair and efficient manner. By identifying a responsible party in advance, the City can resolve violations through direct communication rather than prolonged enforcement actions, reducing administrative burden and ensuring consistent application of the code.

9. Chapter 17.35.040(1)(d) – Expiration of Application Timeframe d. Expiration of Application. If an applicant fails to correct the specified deficiencies within the specific time limit, the application shall expire and be deemed withdrawn within one (1) year of an application being deemed incomplete if no notification action is taken by the applicant, unless an extension is granted by the Director. Staff shall provide at least one notice (via e-mail or mail) to the applicant at least sixty (60) days prior to the application being deemed withdrawn. After the expiration of an application, review shall require the submittal of a new, complete application, along with all required fees.

Summary: The Zoning Code currently does not clearly identify expiration terms or inactivity thresholds for pending applications. As a result, stale or indefinitely inactive applications remain open, causing administrative burdens and uncertainty in land use tracking. Establishing timelines with notice procedures improve workflow efficiency, accountability, and clarity for applicants and staff.

10. Chapter 17.35.040(A)(2) – Amending the language for complete applications

2. Complete Application. When an application is deemed complete, the Director shall make a record of that date. If an application requires a public hearing, the Director shall schedule it and notify the applicant of the date and time, pursuant to Section 17.35.060, Public Notice. a. Additional Information Necessary. Following a determination that an application is complete, if the Director determines that modifications or additional information is necessary before the application can proceed, the Director shall provide written notification to the applicant listing what information is needed.
b. Submittal of Additional Information. The applicant shall provide the necessary information within the time limit specified by the Director, which shall be no sooner than 30 days.

The Director may grant one extension of up to ninety (90) days. c. Expiration of Application. If an applicant fails to provide the information requested by the Director within the specified time limit, the application shall expire and be deemed withdrawn within one (1) year of the written notice from the Director to the applicant if no action is taken by the applicant, unless an extension is granted by the Director. Staff shall provide at least one notice (via e-mail or mail) to the applicant at least sixty (60) days prior to the application being deemed withdrawn. After the expiration of an application, review shall require the submittal of a new, complete application, along with required fees.
537
Omnibus Code Amendments
April 15, 2026

Page 6 ends

d. Public Hearing. If an application requires a public hearing, the Director shall schedule it and notify the applicant of the date and time, pursuant to Section 17.35.060, Public Notice.

Summary: Currently, the zoning code does not clearly lay out the process for a complete application in sufficient detail. Establishing clear completeness criteria ensures that applications contain the minimum information necessary for a thorough review at the outset of a project. This reduces processing delays caused by incomplete submittals, minimizes repeated resubmittals, and allows the City to evaluate projects against adopted standards in a timely and consistent manner. Clearly identified review timeframes provide transparency and predictability for applicants and the public, allowing projects to be coordinated with environmental review, public noticing, and hearing schedules. Defined timeframes also support efficient allocation of City resources and staff time to ensure that discretionary and statutory deadlines, where applicable, are met. These provisions are meant to strengthen the City’s ability to administer planning applications efficiently and deliver high-quality planning outcomes.

11. Chapter 17.35.060 (A)(2) – Include all site addresses in mailed notices. (A)(2) All property owners of record and site addresses within a minimum 500-foot radius of the subject property as shown on the latest available assessment roll or a larger radius if deemed necessary by the Director to provide adequate public notification.

Summary: Current noticing procedures only require notification of property owners, excluding renters who frequently occupy impacted areas. This creates a fairness and engagement gap in public participation. Including site addresses ensures broader community outreach, improves equity in notification practices, and responds to community expectations for transparency in development review processes.

12. 17.35.100D (Extensions) – Zoning Administrator extension of permits and approvals Extensions. The Zoning Administrator may approve a two-year extension of any permit or approval granted under this title upon receipt of a written application with the required fee within the time period specified by the Review Authority, or two years of the date of the approval, if the permit or approval is substantially consistent with previous entitlements.

Summary: The Zoning Administrator currently has the authority to extend permits and planning approvals.

Adding language allowing permit extensions when it is found that the circumstances under which the permit is substantially consistent with previous entitlements create a standard for which the Zoning Administrator can justify an extension. This provides predictability for applicants, protects public interest, and reduces the likelihood of arbitrary or appealable outcomes.

13. Chapter 17.51.020 (Definitions) – Adding definition of Low Barrier Navigation Center.

Low Barrier Navigation Center. A Housing First, low-barrier, service-enriched shelter focused on moving people into permanent housing that provides temporary living facilities while case managers connect individuals experiencing homelessness to income, public benefits, health services, shelter, and housing. The centers reduce barriers to access, such as not prohibiting pets or storage of possessions, permitting individuals to reside with partners, or designing shelters to permit privacy.

Summary: The definition is added to facilitate the changes noted in Table 17.09.020 to allow low barrier navigation centers (LBNCs) by right in commercial and mixed-use zones where multi-family is permitted. The definition comes directly from California Government Code 65660, and Housing Element (HE) Program 6.4.

14. Chapter 18.20.040 – Standards on manufactured homes, remove section B(2). (B) 2. Manufactured home chassis is supported by reinforced piers or other foundation elements of at least equivalent strength that are no less than thirty-six inches in height above grade and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse and lateral movement.

Summary: The City participates in the National Flood Insurance Program’s (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS), which allows residents to receive discounted flood insurance premiums based on the City’s efforts to reduce flood risk and go above and beyond federal requirements. FEMA recently updated the CRS Manual in September 2025, introducing new standards that require newly constructed, substantially improved, and/or reconstructed due to substantial damage residential single-family, multi-family, or manufactured homes to be elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). To stay in compliance and maintain program 538
Omnibus Code Amendments
April 15, 2026

Page 7 ends

eligibility, staff recommend amending the ordinance regarding manufactured homes in certain flood zones to remove outdated language to align with the new standards. This update helps protect residents and property from future flood risks while preserving flood insurance savings for the community.

Environmental Considerations
This project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to §15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) and §15061(b)(3) (where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment) which are classified as Categorical Exemptions of the CEQA Guidelines.

Commission Recommendation
This item was presented to the Planning Commission at a public hearing on February 19, 2026. The Planning Commission unanimously approved staff’s recommendation.

Strategic Plan Integration
The omnibus code amendments align with 2025 Strategic Plan and Principles by promoting Core Services and Infrastructure and Local Economic Development specifically by allowing for clearer and streamlined permitting processes and removing barriers to mixed-use and infill development.

Alternatives
Staff recommends the City Council waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance 26-1 regarding amendments to Title 8 (Health and Safety), Title 17 (Zoning), and Title 18 (Floodplain Management) of the Municipal Code; and find that the project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to §15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) and §15061(b)(3) (where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment) of the CEQA Guidelines. The City Council’s primary alternatives to the recommended action are summarized below.

1. Find that the requested changes are not appropriate revisions of the Municipal Code and reject the second reading of Ordinance 26-1 at this time.

2. Find that the Categorical Exemption is not the appropriate level of environmental review and direct staff to perform additional environmental analysis (specify impacts to be addressed) prior to Commission consideration of the request.

3. Continue the item to a future date and request that additional information (specified by the City Council) be provided at that time.

Coordination and Review
This report was developed by the Community Development Department in coordination with the City Attorney’s Office, City Manager’s Office, and the Fire Department.

Budget/Cost Impact
There is no direct budget impact associated with this action.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution 26-1PC

2. Ordinance 26-1 (Clean Copy)

3. Ordinance 26-1 (Redline Copy)
539
RESOLUTION 26-1PC

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION

OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 8 (HEALTH AND SAFETY), TITLE 17 (ZONING), AND TITLE 18 (FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT) OF THE

MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, the City of West Sacramento desires to promote and protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare; to provide a plan for sound and orderly development, and to ensure social and economic stability through adoption of a Municipal Code Update; and
WHEREAS, the proposed revisions to amend Title 8 (Health and Safety), Title 17 (Zoning), and Title 18 (Floodplain Management) of the Municipal Code include: Chapter

8.18.040 – Amending definition of Hazardous Materials; 17.09.020 – Low Barrier Navigation Centers in Commercial and Mixed Use Zones; Chapter 17.22.030 – Amending the language for Development on Lots Divided by Zone Boundaries; Chapter 17.27.050 (G) – Adding AB2097 to Parking Reductions; Chapter 17.30.100(A)(2)(a) – Compliance with state law regarding parking for emergency shelters; Chapter 17.31.080 Temporary Signage – Amending the definition of Sign Face; Chapter 17.31.090 Temporary Signage – Adding General Requirements as new subsection (A); Chapter 17.31.110 Temporary Signage – Adding Statement of Responsibility; Chapter 17.35.040(1)(d) – Amending the language for Expiration of Application; Chapter

17.35.040(A)(2) – Amending the language for a Complete Application; Chapter 17.35.060 (A)(2) – Include all site addresses in mailed notices; Chapter 17.35.100D (Extensions) – Zoning Administrator extension of Permits and Approvals; Chapter 17.51.020 (Definitions) – Adding definition of Low Barrier Navigation Center; Chapter 18.20.040 (Floodplain Management) – Standards on manufactured homes, remove section B(2); and WHEREAS, the proposed changes to the Municipal Code are exempt from CEQA review pursuant to §15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) and §15061(b)(3) (where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment) of the CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on February 19, 2026, the Planning Commission considered public comments; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council take the following action:

1. Find that the project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to §15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) and §15061(b)(3) (where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment) of the CEQA Guidelines; and

2. Adopt Resolution 26-1PC recommending that the City Council adopt Ordinance 26-1 amending sections of Title 8 (Health and Safety), Title 17 (Zoning), and Title 18 (Floodplain Management) of the Municipal Code.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of West Sacramento this 19th day of February 2026, by the following vote:

Docusign Envelope ID: 4CA8BAF5-0EA3-4326-9F5F-C3DB849675D4 540
AYES: Delgado, Jackson, Olivarez, Wong
NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT: Sablan
_____
Matthew Delgado,
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:

Tristan Osborn, AICP, Secretary
Docusign Envelope ID: 4CA8BAF5-0EA3-4326-9F5F-C3DB849675D4 541
Attachment 2
ORDINANCE 26-1

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS WITHIN TITLE 8 (HEALTH AND SAFETY), 17 (ZONING), AND TITLE 18 (FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT) OF THE WEST

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL CODE
The City Council of the City of West Sacramento does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Purpose and Authority. The purpose of the Ordinance is to make proposed amendments to Title 8 (Health and Safety), Title 17 (Zoning) and Title 18 (Floodplain Management) of the West Sacramento Municipal Code.

Section 2. Amendments. The following amendments are made to various sections of the West Sacramento Municipal Code:

1. The definition of "Hazardous materials" in Section 8.18.040 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Hazardous materials” mean those chemicals or substances which are physical hazards or health hazards as defined and classified in the CFC, whether the materials are in usable or waste condition.

2. The table in Section 17.09.020 is amended by adding additional uses. The remainder of the table remains unchanged. The following is hereby added to the table in Section 17.09.020:

TABLE 17.09.020: LAND USE REGULATIONS—COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES "P" = Permitted use "C" = Conditional Use Permit required "M" = Minor Use Permit required "-" Use not allowed
Use
Classification CBD C CH

MU-NC MU-C
WF
Additional
Regulations
Residential Uses
Low Barrier
Navigation
Center

P P - P P P
Supportive
Housing
Transitional
Housing
Transitional and supportive housing constitute a residential use and are subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential uses of the same type in the same zone.

Specific Limitations:
(5) A Low Barrier Navigation Center shall comply with Government Code Sections 65660, 65664, and 65666

3. Section 17.22.030(b) is amended, and Section 17.22.030(c) is added to the West 542
Attachment 2
Sacramento Municipal Code, to read as follows:

B. Exceptions. If more than 60% of a lot (as measured by lot area) is located in one zone, modifications to the provisions of this section may be granted by the Zoning Administrator.

C. Appeals.

1. Any determination made pursuant to this section shall be subject to appeal in accordance with Chapter 17.35.130 (Appeals).

4. Section 17.27.050(G) is hereby added to the West Sacramento Municipal Code to read as follows:
(G) California Assembly Bill (AB) 2097 (2022)
AB 2097 (Gov't. Code section 65863.2) prohibits cities from enforcing minimum automobile parking requirements for residential, commercial, or other development projects located within one-half (1/2) mile of "public transit," except in limited circumstances as detailed in subsection 2.

1. Definitions. For the purposes of subsection G, the following definitions shall apply:
i. "Housing development project" means a housing development project as defined in Government Code section 65589.5(h)(2).
ii. "Project" does not include a project where any portion is designated for use as a hotel, motel, bed and breakfast inn, or other transient lodging, except where a portion of a housing development project is designated for use as a residential hotel, as defined in Section 50519 of the Health and Safety Code. iii. "Public transit" means "major transit stop" as defined in Public Resources Code section 21155.
iv. Public Resources Code section 21155 defines "major transit stop" as "a major transit stop is as defined in Section 21064.3, except that, for purposes of this section, it also includes major transit stops that are included in the applicable regional transportation plan. For purposes of this section, a high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. A project shall be considered to be within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor if all parcels within the project have no more than 25 percent of their area farther than one-half mile from the stop or corridor and if not more than 10 percent of the residential units or 100 units, whichever is less, in the project are farther than one-half mile from the stop or corridor." v. Public Resources Code section 21064.3 defines "major transit stop" as a site containing any of the following:
a. an existing rail or bus rapid transit station.
b. a ferry terminal served either by a bus or rail transit service. c. the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 20 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

2. Notwithstanding subparagraph 1, the City may impose or enforce minimum automobile parking requirements within one-half (1/2) mile of public transit if the City makes written findings, within 30 days of the receipt of the completed application, that not imposing or enforcing minimum automobile parking requirements on development would have a substantially negative impact, supported by a preponderance of the evidence in the record, on any of the following, consistent with Government Code section 65863.2:
543
Attachment 2
i. The City's ability to meet its share of the regional housing need for low- and very low income households;
ii. The City's ability to meet any special housing needs for the elderly or persons with disabilities identified in the analysis required pursuant to Government Code section 65583(a)(7); or
iii. Existing residential or commercial parking within one-half (1/2) mile of the housing development project.

5. Section 17.30.100(A)(2)(a) of the West Sacramento Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
a. Parking. None beyond the parking required for the residential housing type

6. The definition of "sign face" in Section 17.31.080 is hereby amended to read as follows:

Sign face. An exterior display surface of a sign, including non-structural trim, exclusive of the supporting structure. The area of a sign which is available for mounting and public display of the visually communicative image. Each face of the temporary sign shall count towards the square footage allowed.

7. Section 17.31.090 – Adding General Requirement language as new subsection (A).

The remainder of Section 17.31.090 is hereby re-lettered without substantive change.

Section 17.31.090(A) of the West Sacramento Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows:
§ 17.31.090 On-Site Temporary Signs.

A. General Requirements

1. Illumination. On-site temporary signs regulated in this subsection shall not be illuminated.

2. Other Prohibitions. All prohibitions stated in Chapter 17.29.050 shall apply to temporary signs.

8. Section 17.31.110 is hereby added to the West Sacramento Municipal Code to read as follows:
§ 17.31.110 Statement of Responsibility
Every temporary sign located in a non-residential or commercial zone shall have a written corresponding statement of responsibility filed with the office of the City Clerk certifying a person who will be responsible for removing the sign and who will reimburse the City for any cost incurred to remove it, with such certification being made upon forms prepared by 544
Attachment 2
the City.

9. Section 17.35.040(A)(1)(d) is hereby amended to read as follows:

Expiration of Application. If an applicant fails to correct the specified deficiencies within the specific time limit, the application shall expire and be deemed withdrawn within one (1) year of an application being deemed incomplete if no notification action is taken by the applicant, unless an extension is granted by the Director. Staff shall provide at least one notice (via e-mail or mail) to the applicant at least sixty (60) days prior to the application being deemed withdrawn. After the expiration of an application, review shall require the submittal of a new, complete application, along with all required fees.

10. Section 17.35.040(A)(2) is hereby amended to read as follows:

2. Complete Application. When an application is deemed complete, the Director shall make a record of that date.
a. Additional Information Necessary. Following a determination that an application is complete, if the Director determines that modifications or additional information is necessary before the application can proceed, the Director shall provide written notification to the applicant listing what information is needed. b. Submittal of Additional Information. The applicant shall provide the necessary information within the time limit specified by the Director, which shall be no sooner than 30 days. The Director may grant one extension of up to ninety (90) days. c. Expiration of Application. If an applicant fails to provide the information requested by the Director within the specified time limit, the application shall expire and be deemed withdrawn within one (1) year of the written notice from the Director to the applicant if no action is taken by the applicant, unless an extension is granted by the Director. Staff shall provide at least one notice (via e-mail or mail) to the applicant at least sixty (60) days prior to the application being deemed withdrawn. After the expiration of an application, review shall require the submittal of a new, complete application, along with required fees.
d. Public Hearing. If an application requires a public hearing, the Director shall schedule it and notify the applicant of the date and time, pursuant to Section 17.35.060, Public Notice.

11. Section 17.35.060(A)(2) is hereby amended to read as follows:

All property owners of record and site addresses within a minimum 500-foot radius of the subject property as shown on the latest available assessment roll or a larger radius if deemed necessary by the Director to provide adequate public notification.

12. Section 17.35.100(D) is hereby amended to read as follows:

Extensions. The Zoning Administrator may approve a two-year extension of any permit or approval granted under this title upon receipt of a written application with the required fee within the time period specified by the Review Authority, or two years of the date of the approval, if the permit or approval is substantially consistent with previous entitlements.

13. Section 17.51.020 is hereby amended to add the definition of "Low Barrier Navigation Center." The definition of "Low Barrier Navigation Center" is hereby added to Section 17.51.020 and shall read as follows:
545
Attachment 2
Low Barrier Navigation Center. A Housing First, low-barrier, service-enriched shelter focused on moving people into permanent housing that provides temporary living facilities while case managers connect individuals experiencing homelessness to income, public benefits, health services, shelter, and housing. The centers reduce barriers to access, such as not prohibiting pets or storage of possessions, permitting individuals to reside with partners, or designing shelters to permit privacy.

14. Section 18.20.040(B) is amended by removing subparagraph (2). Section

18.20.040(B) is hereby amended to read as follows:
(B) All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved on sites in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision within Zones A1-30, AH, AE on the community's Flood Insurance Rate Map that are not subject to the provisions of subsection A of this section will be elevated so that the:

1. Lowest floor of the manufactured home is at least one foot above the base flood elevation.

Section 3. Severability. If any provision of this chapter, or the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, the remainder of this chapter, to the extent it can be given effect, or the application of those provisions to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are severable.

Section 4. Environmental Considerations. This project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to §15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) and §15061(b)(3) (where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment) which are classified as Categorical Exemptions of the CEQA Guidelines.

Section 5. Effective Date and Publication. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its adoption, and pursuant to Resolution 99-46 was published in summary format prior to adoption, and a summary will be published within 15 days after adoption in a paper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of West Sacramento.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento this th day of April 2026, by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney CODIFY _X UNCODIFY
546
Attachment 3
REDLINE VERSION TO SHOW CHANGES – NOT OFFICIAL ORDINANCE

ADDITIONS ARE SHOWN IN BOLD/UNDERLINE

DELETIONS ARE SHOW IN STRIKEOUT TEXT
ORDINANCE 26-1

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS WITHIN TITLE 8 (HEALTH AND SAFETY), 17 (ZONING), AND TITLE 18 (FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT) OF THE WEST

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL CODE
The City Council of the City of West Sacramento does ordain as follows:

Section 2. Amendments. The following amendments are made to various sections of the West Sacramento Municipal Code:

1. The definition of "Hazardous materials" in Section 8.18.040 of the West Sacramento Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Hazardous materials” mean those chemicals or substances which are physical hazards or health hazards as defined and classified in Chapter 27 of the CFC, whether the materials are in usable or waste condition.

2. The table in Section 17.09.020 is amended by adding additional uses. The remainder of the table remains unchanged. The following is hereby added to the table in Section

17.09.020:

MU-NC MU-C WF
Additional
Regulations
Residential Uses
Low Barrier
Navigation
Center

Specific Limitations:
(5) A Low Barrier Navigation Center shall comply with Government Code Sections 65660, 65664, and 65666
547
Attachment 3

3. Section 17.22.030(b) is amended, and Section 17.22.030(c) is added to the West Sacramento Municipal Code, to read as follows:

B. Exceptions. If more than 60% of a lot (as measured by lot area) is located in one zone, modifications to the provisions of this section may be granted through approval of a Conditional Use Permit. by the Zoning Administrator.

C. Appeals.

1. Any determination made pursuant to this section shall be subject to appeal in accordance with Chapter 17.35.130 (Appeals).

4. Section 17.27.050(G) is hereby added to the West Sacramento Municipal Code to read as follows:
(G) California Assembly Bill (AB) 2097 (2022)
AB 2097 (Government Code section 65863.2) prohibits cities from enforcing minimum automobile parking requirements for residential, commercial, or other development projects located within one-half (1/2) mile of "public transit," except in limited circumstances as detailed in subsection 2.

1. Definitions. For the purposes of subsection G, the following definitions shall apply:
i. "Housing development project" means a housing development project as defined in Government Code section 65589.5(h)(2).
ii. "Project" does not include a project where any portion is designated for use as a hotel, motel, bed and breakfast inn, or other transient lodging, except where a portion of a housing development project is designated for use as a residential hotel, as defined in Section 50519 of the Health and Safety Code. iii. "Public transit" means "major transit stop" as defined in Public Resources Code section 21155.
iv. Public Resources Code section 21155 defines "major transit stop" as "a major transit stop is as defined in Section 21064.3, except that, for purposes of this section, it also includes major transit stops that are included in the applicable regional transportation plan. For purposes of this section, a highquality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. A project shall be considered to be within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor if all parcels within the project have no more than 25 percent of their area farther than one-half mile from the stop or corridor and if not more than 10 percent of the residential units or 100 units, whichever is less, in the project are farther than one-half mile from the stop or corridor." v. Public Resources Code section 21064.3 defines "major transit stop" as a site containing any of the following:
a. an existing rail or bus rapid transit station.
b. a ferry terminal served either by a bus or rail transit service. c. the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 20 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

2. Notwithstanding subparagraph 1, the City may impose or enforce minimum automobile parking requirements within one-half (1/2) mile of public transit if the City makes written findings, within 30 days of the receipt of the completed 548
Attachment 3
application, that not imposing or enforcing minimum automobile parking requirements on development would have a substantially negative impact, supported by a preponderance of the evidence in the record, on any of the following, consistent with Government Code section 65863.2:
i. The City's ability to meet its share of the regional housing need for low- and very low income households;
ii. The City's ability to meet any special housing needs for the elderly or persons with disabilities identified in the analysis required pursuant to Government Code section 65583(a)(7); or
iii. Existing residential or commercial parking within one-half (1/2) mile of the housing development project.

5. Section 17.30.100(A)(2)(a) of the West Sacramento Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
a. Parking. None beyond the parking required for the residential housing type

6. The definition of "sign face" in Section 17.31.080 is hereby amended to read as follows:

7. Section 17.31.090 – Adding General Requirement language as new subsection (A). The remainder of Section 17.31.090 is hereby re-lettered without substantive change. Section

17.31.090(A) of the West Sacramento Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows:
§ 17.31.090 On-Site Temporary Signs.

A. General Requirements.

1. Illumination. On-site temporary signs regulated in this subsection shall not be illuminated.

2. Other Prohibitions. All prohibitions stated in Chapter 17.29.050 shall apply to temporary signs.

8. Section 17.31.110 is hereby added to the West Sacramento Municipal Code to read as follows:
§ 17.31.110 Statement of Responsibility
Every temporary sign located in a non-residential or commercial zone shall have a 549
Attachment 3
written corresponding statement of responsibility filed with the office of the City Clerk certifying a person who will be responsible for removing the sign and who will reimburse the City for any cost incurred to remove it, with such certification being made upon forms prepared by the City.

9. Section 17.35.040(A)(1)(d) is hereby amended to read as follows:
d. Expiration of Application. If an applicant fails to correct the specified deficiencies within the specific time limit, the application shall expire and be deemed withdrawn within one (1) year of an application being deemed incomplete if no notification action is taken by the applicant, unless an extension is granted by the Director. Staff shall provide at least one notice (via e-mail or mail) to the applicant at least sixty (60) days prior to the application being deemed withdrawn. After the expiration of an application, review shall require the submittal of a new, complete application, along with all required fees.

10. Section 17.35.040(A)(2) is hereby amended to read as follows:

After the expiration of an application, review shall require the submittal of a new, complete application, along with required fees.
d. Public Hearing. If an application requires a public hearing, the Director shall schedule it and notify the applicant of the date and time, pursuant to Section 17.35.060, Public Notice.

11. Section 17.35.060(A)(2) is hereby amended to read as follows:

12. Section 17.35.100(D) is hereby amended to read as follows:

13. Section 17.51.020 is hereby amended to add the definition of "Low Barrier Navigation Center." The definition of "Low Barrier Navigation Center" is hereby added to Section

17.51.020 and shall read as follows:

14. Section 18.20.040(B) is amended by removing subparagraph (2). Section 18.20.040(B) is hereby amended to read as follows:
(B) All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved on sites in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision within Zones A1-30, AH, AE on the community's Flood Insurance Rate Map that are not subject to the provisions of subsection A of this section will be elevated so that the:

1. Lowest floor of the manufactured home is at least one foot above the base flood elevation; and

2. Manufactured home chassis is supported by reinforced piers or other foundation elements of at least equivalent strength that are no less than thirty-six inches in height above grade and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist flotation, collapse and lateral movement.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of West Sacramento this th day of Aprill 2026, by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
551
Attachment 3
Martha Guerrero, Mayor
ATTEST:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney CODIFY _X UNCODIFY
552

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 15, 2026 ITEM # 10
SUBJECT:

CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF A FEDERAL CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES WITH DOKKEN ENGINEERING FOR THE SYCAMORE TRAIL PHASE IV AND V PROJECT (CIP 11043) AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 26-31 APPROVING

RELATED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
INITIATED OR REQUESTED BY: REPORT COORDINATED OR PREPARED BY:
[ ] Council [X] Staff
[ ] Other
Stephanie Chhan, Senior Transportation Planner
Community Development Department
ATTACHMENT [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Information [ ] Direction [X] Action

OBJECTIVE
The objective of this report is to provide the City Council with sufficient information to award a federal contract for professional services with Dokken Engineering for preparation of a feasibility study associated with the Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Project (CIP 11043) and adopt Resolution 26-31 amending the Capital Improvement Program for related budget adjustments.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff respectfully recommends that the City Council:
1) Award the federal contract for professional services with Dokken Engineering for the Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Project (CIP 11043);
2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the contract (CDD26-088) with Dokken Engineering for an amount not-to-exceed $693,355.75;
3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to make non-substantive changes or modifications to the federal contract for professional services, with approval from the City Attorney; 4) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to make contract amendments up to 10 percent ($69,336) of the value of the contract; and
5) Adopt Resolution 26-31 authorizing the transfer of $33,562 from the Measure E Fund in order to support the contract contingency toward the Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Project.

BACKGROUND
In 2023, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) was awarded funding from the United States Department of Transportation's Neighborhood Access and Equity (NAE) Discretionary Grant Program for the Green Zone Access and Equity Regional Planning Project. This award allows the SACOG region to advance planning, engineering, design and project development activities to address barrier transportation facilities in nine federally designated disadvantaged communities that are (1) locally prioritized for infill development and (2) share the challenge of high volume, autocentric facilities that bisect existing neighborhoods to limit both economic and transportation mobility. Included in this regional planning project was a subaward of $850,000 to the City of West Sacramento for Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V.

Sycamore Trail is a five-phase project that extends south from Sacramento Avenue near Yolo Street across the United State Route 50 (US 50) and the Barge Canal to the Lake Washington Boulevard and Jefferson Boulevard intersection. Sycamore Trail is a Class 1 multi-use trail that will be the only low transportation stress route connecting the City’s northern and southern areas, and it will cross three transportation facilities that divide the community and deny disadvantaged communities access to the high-quality amenities in the City’s newer areas that are not disadvantaged. The three east-west transportation facilities are, from north to south: 1) the Union Pacific Railroad/Sierra Northern Railway, 2) US-50/I-80 Business, and 3) the Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel and Barge Canal.

The City completed Phase I of the Sycamore Trail in April of 2019. The first phase provides a multi-use paved trail and trail amenities that connect Westfield Park to Joey Lopes Park. Phase II of the project opened to the public in May 2025 and connects Evergreen Avenue just south of Joey Lopes Park with Westmore Oaks Elementary School to the south of US-50. A new pedestrian overcrossing crossing United States 50/Interstate 80 Business was constructed as part of Phase II. Phase III will further extend the trail from Westmore Oaks Elementary School to the intersection of Park Boulevard and Stone Boulevard. Phase III is currently in design and is fully funded through construction.
553
Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Project- Dokken Contract
April 15, 2026

Page 2 ends

After Phase III is complete, the next step will be to cross through or over the twenty-foot-high Union Pacific Railroad and Sierra Northern Railway track embankments at the north end to reach Sacramento Avenue (Phase IV) and to cross the barge canal and rail alignment in the south to reach Arlington Road and continue to the Jefferson Boulevard/Lake Washington Boulevard intersection (Phase V). A map and description of the Sycamore Trail is provided in Attachment 1.

A request for proposals (RFP) was issued to seek qualified consultants to complete a feasibility study for the Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V. Additionally, the solicitation included optional tasks, at the discretion of the City, to advance the project into environmental and preliminary engineering should additional funding be identified and secured. The intent of the feasibility study phase is to develop community-supported and implementable design concepts for bicycle and pedestrian crossings of these major barriers.

ANALYSIS
A competitive procurement for the Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Project was completed in accordance with the City’s procurement procedures for professional services. An RFP was released (25-061-RFP) and advertised to potential vendors on December 12, 2025 through OpenGov, the City’s eProcurement system. The RFP was further advertised on the West Sacramento News Ledger, DemandStar, PublicPurchase and the American Planning Association’s (APA) open procurement resource.

The City received five proposals by the submission deadline of January 30, 2026. Based on the evaluation criteria, all five proposals were deemed responsive and responsible, listed below in alphabetical order:

1. Dewberry Engineers, Inc.

2. Dokken Engineering

3. GHD, Inc.

4. Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

5. Wood Rodgers, Inc.

The five person evaluation panel consisted of staff from the City’s Community Development Department, Capital Projects Department, Parks and Recreation Department, and additional staff from the Port of West Sacramento and the Yolo Transportation District. The evaluation panel held interviews for the top three ranked firms based on the preliminary evaluation and ranking of the written proposals. On February 26, the evaluation panel held interviews, which consisted of a presentation to by the proposers and a question and answers section. Questions were asked relative to understanding of the project areas, technical experience, building consensus, ensuring coordination and timely completion of the project, and compliance with the grant requirements.

Award is recommended to the firm considering such factors as qualifications and experience, staffing and project organization, project understanding technical approach, technical ability and familiarity with state and federal procedures, financial responsibility, and acceptance of the City’s contract for services.

Following the interview, the evaluation panel identified Dokken Engineering as the most qualified firm and recommends consideration of award of the federal contract for professional services. The attached draft contract includes the negotiated scope and fees to complete the assignment (Attachment 2). Furthermore, the subrecipient grant agreement with SACOG for the Green Zone Access and Equity Regional Planning Project is included as Exhibit G to the draft contract.

Environmental Considerations
This action is not a “project” for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq. (“CEQA”), because it is not an activity that may cause either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and, therefore, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines sections 15060(c) and 15378(a), it is not subject to environmental review.

Environmental documentation required for the project will be conducted during the project development.

Commission Recommendation
This is an administrative item and does not have new policy implications that would require Transportation, Mobility, and Infrastructure Commission input. As such, this item was not presented to the TMI Commission.

Staff will return to the Commission and Council with updates throughout the development of the Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Project.
554
Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Project- Dokken Contract
April 15, 2026

Page 3 ends

Strategic Plan Integration
This project advances the 2025 Strategic Plan Principles: “Mobility & Connectivity,” in support of providing convenient and sustainable choices for people to get where they are going; “Inclusive & Diverse,” in support of equitable investment and social/environmental justice in the City; “Climate & Energy Resiliency,” in support of reducing climate impact by providing resiliency in the transportation network; and “Parks & Open Space,” in support of providing diverse outdoor options for recreation and community with nature at any age.

Alternatives
Alternatives available to the City Council include:
1) Approve the recommended actions as stated above.
2) Make adjustments to the recommended actions.
3) Decline to approve the recommended actions.

Alternatives 2 and 3 are not recommended as this project is vital to the well-being of the community and is grant funded. Revisions or additional conditions could cause delays to the start of work and risk exceeding the grant deadline. This work is critical to implementing multiple City plans and goals to address mobility, safety, equity, and equality.

Coordination and Review
This report was prepared by the Transportation & Mobility Division of the Community Development Department and the project received review or support from the Finance Department, Capital Projects Department, and City Manager’s Office.

Budget/Cost Impact
The City is a subrecipient of SACOG’s Green Zone Access and Equity Regional Planning Project and has received $850,000 in NAE Discretionary Grant funds for this project. The City did not have to provide a local match for these funds. This project is included in the City’s Capital Improvement Program as CIP 11043.

Table 1 summarizes the current project funding costs and budget sources.

Table 1: Project Cost and Budget Summary
Cost
Dokken Engineering (Federal Contract for Professional Services) $693,356 10 Percent Contract Contingency $69,336
Estimated City Staff Time (Project Management and Coordination) $120,870 Total Estimated Cost $883,562
Budget
Federal Funds - NAE Discretionary Grant $850,000
Surplus/Deficit ($33,562)
Based on the information in the above table, there is a shortfall of $33,562 related to consultant contract contingency, to complete the project. As such, staff is recommending City Council adoption of Resolution 26-31 appropriating $33,562 from the Measure E – Bike, Ped, Trail Fund (Fund 110) to the Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Project (Attachment 3).

ATTACHMENTS

1. Sycamore Trail Description and Map

2. CDD26-088 Federal Contract for Professional Services

3. Resolution 26-31
555
Project Benefits
• More than doubles length of City’s
existing Class I Bike Paths
• Provides a low stress bike and pedestrian
trail through the heart of the City
• Creates access across US 50 and the
Deep Water Ship Channel via two
separate overcrossings
• Provides safe passage across the railroad
tracks in the north via a tunnel to
connect with Yolo Street
50 Westmore
Oaks Park Westmore
Oaks
Elem.

STONE BL VD

EVERGREEN AV E

REED AVE REED AVE
BRYTE
AVE

BRYTE AVE

LINDEN RD

LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD

SACRAMENTO AVE
GATEW

PARK BLVD

WEST CAPITOL AVE WEST CAPITOL AVE

SOUTHPORT PKWY

RIVER RD
50 Westmore
Oaks Park Westmore
Oaks
Elem.

STONE BLVD

EVERGREEN AVE

REED AVE REED AVE

BRYTE AVE BRYTE AVE

LINDEN RD

LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD

SACRAMENTO AVE
GATEW

PARK BLVD PARK BLVD

WEST CAPITOL AVE WEST CAPITOL AVE

SOUTHPORT PKWY

RIVER RD
Phase IV
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Phase V
Westǻeld
Village
Elem.

The Sycamore Trail Extension is a five-phase project that is most significant because it connects the Westfield Village neighborhood with the City’s larger trail network. The Westfield Village neighborhood is more established and is somewhat remote; disconnected by the UPRR to the north and US 50 to the south. Residents have not been able to travel by bicycle beyond their smaller neighborhood borders so this project provides Class I Bike Path access north to Sacramento Avenue (which has Class II Bike Lanes and connects to the Bryte neighborhood). This project also provides Class I Bike Path access south all the way to Southport.

Sycamore Trail Project
Designed and
built in five phases
Phase II Aerial View of
US 50 Overcrossing
Phase I
opened in 2019
Phase II opened
in 2025, creating
a new crossing
over US50
Phase V will
cross rail and
the barge canal
Deep Water
Ship Channel

RIVERFRONT ST

JEFFERSON BLVD JEFFERSON BLVD
3RD ST

STONEBLVD

DAVIS RD

ALLANAVE LLAN AVE

SOUTH RIVER RD

EVERGREEN AVE

LINDEN RD

MARSHALL RD

KEGLE DR

REEDAVE
5TH ST
15TH ST

BRYTE AVE

HIGHLAND DR

GOLDEN GATEDR

OAKLAND BAY DR

LIGHTHOUSE DR

LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD

BEVAN RD

SACRAMENTO AVE

EVA YROGERG EVA YROGERG

GATEWAY DR

PARK BLVD PARK BLVD

ENTERPR SI E BLVD
HARBOR

BLVD HARBOR BLVD LISBONA VE

CARRIE ST RR E ST

BURROWS AVE

SOUTHPORT PKWY

STILLWATER RD

EVASITO

WEST CAPITOLAVE WEST CAPITOL AVE

TS OCMAR

HARMON RD RMON RD

FISHERAVE

PARKWAY BLVD ARKWAY BLVD VILLAGE PKWY

BURROWS ST

RVI E RSI DE PKW Y

SEAPORT BLVD

PARTRIDGE AVE

RIVER RD
80 50
Sacrame nto River
Sacramento River
80 84
Proposed Bicycle Trails
Class 1 (Bike Path)
Class 2 (Bike Lane)
Class 3 (Bike Route)
Class 4 (Separated Bikeway)
Existing Bicycle Trails
Class 1 (Bike Path)
Class 2 (Bike Lane)
Class 3 (B
C
Unpaved Trail
lass 4 (Separtated Bikeway)
ike Route)
01 Miles
D

STONEBLVD

RGREEN AVE
DEN RD
15T
AVE
H

LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD

SACRAMENTO AVE
GATEW

PARK BLVD PARK BLVD

WEST CAPITOL AVE WEST CAPITOL AVE

BURROWS ST
50 SYCAMORE TRAIL
Existing Facility
Phase IV
crosses two rail
enbankments
Phase III wilI
start construction
in 2026
Attachment 1
556
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 1 rev 12/4/23

FEDERAL CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES: ..................................................................................................3

2. TERM OF CONTRACT ....................................................................................................5

3. COMPENSATION: ............................................................................................................6

4. COST PRINCIPLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS ............................8

5. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND OTHER CAPITAL EXPENDITURES ....................8

6. PROMPT PAYMENT FROM LOCAL AGENCY TO CONSULTANT ........................9

7. TERMINATION ................................................................................................................10

8. AMENDMENTS, CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS .................................................10

9. EXTENSIONS OF TIME ................................................................................................10

10. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................10

11. PROPERTY OF CITY .....................................................................................................11

12. RECORD RETENTION ..................................................................................................11

13. AUDIT/AUDIT REVIEW..................................................................................................12

14. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS: ................................................................................13

15. WARRANTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - CONSULTANT ...................................14

16. SUBCONTRACTING ......................................................................................................14

17. PROMPT PROGRESS PAYMENT ..............................................................................15

18. ASSIGNABILITY..............................................................................................................16

19. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (DBE) PARTICIPATION ...........16

20. INTEREST IN CONTRACT ...........................................................................................16

21. MATERIALS CONFIDENTIAL ......................................................................................17

22. LIABILITY OF CONSULTANT-NEGLIGENCE ...........................................................18 Attachment 2
557
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 2 rev 12/4/23

23. INDEMNITY AND LITIGATION COSTS ......................................................................18

24. CLAIMS FILED BY LOCAL AGENCY’S CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR ...............................................................................................................19

25. DISPUTES........................................................................................................................19

26. CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE INSURANCE ..............................................................20

27. NON-DISCRIMINATION CLAUSE AND STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE ..........22

28. TITLE VI ASSURANCES ...............................................................................................23

29. CONTRACT: ENTIRE AGREEMENT ..........................................................................28

30. NOTICE ............................................................................................................................28

31. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS: ..............................................................................29 EXHIBIT A – CONSULTANT PROPOSAL/SCOPE OF WORK .........................................31 EXHIBIT B – SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE ..................................................................32 EXHIBIT C – SCHEDULE OF FEES .......................................................................................33 EXHIBIT D – CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR CODE § 3700 .............34 EXHIBIT E – LABOR COMPLIANCE .....................................................................................35 EXHIBIT F – FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS ...........................................................38

EXHIBIT G - SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT with CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO ...............50 558
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 3 rev 12/4/23
THIS CONTRACT is made on April 15, 2026, by and between the CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO (“City” or “Local Agency”), and Dokken Engineering (“Consultant”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments submitted the Green Zone Access and Equity Regional Planning Project for the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) Reconnecting Communities & Neighborhoods Grant Program in Fiscal Year 2023;
WHEREAS, the Green Zone Access and Equity Regional Planning Project was a Regional Partnership Challenge Grant application that included the City of West Sacramento; WHEREAS, the intent of the Green Zone Access and Equity Regional Planning Project is to advance planning, engineering, design and project development activities to address barrier transportation facilities in ten federally designated disadvantaged communities that are (1) locally prioritized for infill development and (2) share the challenge of high volume, autocentric facilities that bisect existing neighborhoods to limit both economic and transportation mobility;
WHEREAS, the City partnered with SACOG and included the Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Feasibility Study as part of the Green Zone Access and Equity Regional Planning Project; WHEREAS, SACOG was awarded and is the Designated Subrecipient of the USDOT Neighborhood Access and Equity Discretionary Grant Program for the Green Zone Access and Equity Regional Planning Project;
WHEREAS, the SACOG is the Designated Subrecipient acting as the “pass-through” entity for purposes of payment of the federal funds to the City for the Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Feasibility Study, per the requirements on pass-through entities under 2 C.F.R. parts 200 et seq. and 1201 et seq., including 2 C.F.R. 200.331–200.333 and 23 U.S.C. 106(g)(4) where applicable;
WHEREAS, the City issued a request for proposals in need of engineering, environmental, planning, and outreach services for the Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Project on December 12, 2025;
WHEREAS, the Consultant has presented a proposal for such services to the City, dated March 11, 2026, and is duly licensed, qualified and experienced to perform those services; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES:

A. Consultant shall do all work, attend all meetings, produce all reports and carry out all activities necessary to completion of the services described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “A”. This Contract and its exhibits shall also be known as the “Contract Documents.” Terms set forth in any Contract Document shall be deemed to be incorporated in all Contract Documents as if set forth in full therein. In the event of conflict between terms contained in these 559
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 4 rev 12/4/23
Contract Documents, the more specific term shall control. If any portion of the Contract Documents shall be in conflict with any other portion, provisions contained in the Contract shall govern over conflicting provisions contained in the exhibits to the Contract.

B. Consultant enters into this Contract as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City. The Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Contract to bind the City in any respect. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to be inconsistent with this relationship or status. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by the Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the Consultant and not of the City. The City shall not be obligated in any way to pay any wage claims or other claims made against Consultant by any such employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, or any other person resulting from performance of this Contract.

C. The Consultant agrees it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

D. Consultant Services
Consultant services under this Contract include preparation of a feasibility study (Milestone 1) and preliminary engineering/environmental documentation (Milestone 2).

This Contract immediately authorizes the tasks associated with Milestone 1 (except those designated as Optional Tasks). As part of Milestone 1, Consultant shall provide professional engineering and environmental services to assess existing conditions, develop and vet alternatives, and prepare a feasibility study/implementation plan for the Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Project. Optional Tasks associated with Milestone 1, which include the Caltrans Environmental Field Review (Task 7.3) and Grant Application Support (Task 8.5), are not immediately authorized (refer to Section 1E).

As part of Milestone 2 (an Optional Task), Consultant shall provide professional engineering and environmental services to refine the preferred alternatives and obtain CEQA and NEPA clearance for the Sycamore Trail Phases IV and V. The tasks associated with Milestone 2 are not yet authorized – see Section 1E.

Surveys
Consultant has the responsibility for performing preliminary surveys.

Subsurface Investigations
Consultant has responsibility for making subsurface investigations. If borings or other specialized services are to be made by others under the supervision of Consultant, appropriate provisions are to be incorporated.

Outreach
Consultant has the responsibility for engaging with the public and project stakeholders to disseminate project information and obtain feedback.
560
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 5 rev 12/4/23
Environmental Documentation
Environmental documents are not considered complete until a Caltrans District Senior Environmental Planner signs the Categorical Exclusion, the Caltrans Deputy District Director signs the Finding of No Significant Impact, or the Caltrans District Director signs the Record of Decision (See LAPM Chapter 6: Environmental Procedures and the Standard Environmental Reference).

Right of Way
Right of Way requirements are to be determined and shown by Consultant, land surveys and computations with metes and bounds descriptions are to be made, and Right of Way parcel maps are to be furnished.

Local Agency Obligations
All data applicable to the project and in possession of Local Agency, another agency, or government agency that are to be made available to Consultant are referred to in the Contract. Any other assistance or services to be furnished to Consultant are to be stated clearly.

Documentation and Schedules
Contracts where appropriate, shall provide that Consultant document the results of the work to the satisfaction of Local Agency, and if applicable, the State and FHWA. This may include preparation of progress and final reports, or similar evidence of attainment of the Contract objectives.

Deliverable and Number of Copies
The number of copies or documents to be furnished, such as reports, brochures, sets of plans, specifications, or Right of Way parcel maps are identified in Exhibit “A” Scope of Work.

E. Optional Tasks
Optional Task(s) shall be provided only when an amendment authorizing the Optional Task(s) is approved in writing by the City in accordance with the City’s contract amendment procedures. The City reserves the right to perform any Optional Task(s) with its own staff or to retain other contractors to perform the Optional Task(s).

2. TERM OF CONTRACT
A. The services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Contract by the City, and shall be undertaken and completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit “B” and terminate on April 14, 2029.

B. Consultant’s failure to complete work in accordance with the Schedule of Performance may result in delayed compensation as described in Section 3.

C. The City Manager or his or her designee may, by written instrument signed by the Parties, extend the duration of this Contract for three (3) additional 1-year terms in the manner provided in Section 8, provided that the extension does not require the payment of compensation in excess of the maximum compensation set forth in Section 3.A. 561
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 6 rev 12/4/23

3. COMPENSATION:

A. The Consultant shall be paid monthly for the actual fees, costs and expenses, and all time and materials required and expended. Compensation shall not exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit “C,” unless upon written modification of this as described under Section 8. Compensation shall include Milestone 1 as identified in Exhibit “C”, in an amount not-to-exceed Six Hundred Ninety-Three Thousand Three Hundred FiftyFive Dollars and Seventy-Five Cents ($693,355.75). a. Milestone 1 Optional Tasks, if and when authorized, shall not exceed Forty-Two Thousand Forty-Six Dollars and Four Cents ($42,046.04). b. Milestone 2 Optional Tasks, if and when authorized, shall not exceed One Million One Hundred Thousand Twenty-Four Dollars and Eighty Cents ($1,100,024.80) for the duration of the contract.
c. In no event shall the total amount of compensation payable under this agreement exceed the sum of One Million Eight Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand Four Hundred Twenty-Six Dollars and Fifty-Nine Cents ($1,835,426.59). d. Consultant's fees shall be as specified in the Schedule of Fees, which is attached hereto an incorporated herein as Exhibit "C". The specified hourly rates shall include direct salary costs, employee benefits, overhead, and fee. These rates are not adjustable for the performance period set forth in the Contract without prior approval of the City following the provisions described in Section 8.

B. Said amount shall be paid upon submittal of a monthly billing showing completion of the tasks that month. Consultant shall furnish City with invoices for all expenses as well as for all materials authorized by this Contract. The invoices shall be submitted with the monthly billings. If Consultant’s performance is not in conformity with the Schedule of Performance, payments may be delayed or denied, unless the Consultant’s failure to perform in conformity with the Schedule of Performance is a documented result of the City’s failure to conform with the Schedule of Performance, or if the Schedule of Performance is extended pursuant to Section 8.

C. If the work is halted at the request of the City, compensation shall be based upon the proportion that the work performed bears to the total work required by this Contract, subject to Section 7.

D. The method of payment for this Contract will be based on actual cost plus a fixed fee.

Local Agency will reimburse Consultant for actual costs (including labor costs, employee benefits, travel, equipment rental costs, overhead and other direct costs) incurred by Consultant in performance of the work. Consultant will not be reimbursed for actual costs that exceed the estimated wage rates, employee benefits, travel, equipment rental, overhead, and other estimated costs set forth in the approved Consultant’s Cost Proposal, unless additional reimbursement is provided for by Contract amendment. In no event, will Consultant be reimbursed for overhead costs at a rate that exceeds Local Agency’s approved overhead rate set forth in the Cost Proposal. In the event, that Local Agency determines that a change to the work from that specified in the Cost Proposal and Contract is required, the Contract time or actual costs reimbursable by Local Agency shall be adjusted by Contract amendment to accommodate the changed work. The maximum total cost as specified in Section 3.A shall not be exceeded, unless authorized by Contract amendment.
562
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 7 rev 12/4/23
E. The indirect cost rate established for this Contract is extended through the duration of this specific Contract. Consultant’s agreement to the extension of the three 1-year extension applicable period shall not be a condition or qualification to be considered for the work or Contract award.

F. In addition to the allowable incurred costs, Local Agency will pay Consultant a fixed fee of Fifty-Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty-Five Dollars and Ninety-Eight Cents ($59,955.98) for Milestone 1 (excluding Optional Tasks). a. If/when Milestone 1 Optional Tasks are authorized, Local Agency will pay Consultant an additional fixed fee of Three Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty-Two Dollars and Thirty-Six Cents ($3,822.36).
b. If/when the Milestone 2 Optional Task is authorized, Local Agency will pay Consultant Eighty Thousand One Hundred Eleven Dollars and Sixty-Two Cents ($80,111.62).
c. The fixed fee is nonadjustable for the term of the Contract, except in the event of a significant change in the scope of work and such adjustment is made by Contract amendment.

G. Reimbursement for transportation and subsistence costs shall not exceed the rates specified in the approved Cost Proposal.

H. When milestone cost estimates are included in the approved Cost Proposal, Consultant shall obtain prior written approval for a revised milestone cost estimate from the Contract administrator before exceeding such cost estimate.

I. Progress payments will be made monthly in arrears based on services provided and allowable incurred costs. A pro rata portion of Consultant’s fixed fee will be included in the monthly progress payments. If Consultant fails to submit the required deliverable items according to the schedule set forth in Article III Statement of Work, Local Agency shall have the right to delay payment or terminate this Contract.

J. No payment will be made prior to approval of any work, nor for any work performed prior to approval of this Contract.

K. Consultant will be reimbursed promptly according to California Regulations upon receipt by Local Agency’s Contract Administrator of itemized invoices in duplicate. Invoices shall be submitted no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the performance of work for which Consultant is billing. Invoices shall detail the work performed on each milestone and each project as applicable. Invoices shall follow the format stipulated for the approved Cost Proposal and shall reference this Contract number and project title. Final invoice must contain the final cost and all credits due Local Agency including any equipment purchased under the provisions of Section 5. Equipment Purchase. The final invoice should be submitted within sixty (60) calendar days after completion of Consultant’s work. Invoices shall be mailed to Local Agency’s Contract Administrator at the following address:

City of West Sacramento
Community Development Department
Attn: Stephanie Chhan, Senior Transportation Planner
1110 West Capitol Avenue, 2nd Floor
563
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 8 rev 12/4/23
West Sacramento, California 95691
L. The total amount payable by Local Agency including the fixed fee shall not exceed the amount shown under Section 3.A.

M. For personnel subject to prevailing wage rates as described in the California Labor Code, all salary increases, which are the direct result of changes in the prevailing wage rates are reimbursable.

4. COST PRINCIPLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. The Consultant agrees the 48 CFR 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, shall be used to determine the allowability of individual terms of cost.

B. The Consultant also agrees to comply with Federal procedures in accordance with 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.

C. Any costs for which payment has been made to the Consultant that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 48 CFR 31 or 2 CFR 200 are subject to repayment by the Consultant to Local Agency.

D. When a Consultant or Subconsultant is a Non-Profit Organization or an Institution of Higher Education, the Cost Principles for Title 2 CRF 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards shall apply.

5. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND OTHER CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
A. Prior authorization in writing by SACOG’s Project Manager and Local Agency’s Contract Administrator shall be required before Consultant enters into any unbudgeted purchase order, or subcontract exceeding five thousand dollars ($5,000) for supplies, equipment, or Consultant services.

B. Consultant shall provide an evaluation of the necessity or desirability of incurring such costs. For purchase of any item, service, or consulting work not covered in Consultant’s approved Cost Proposal and exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), with prior authorization by SACOG’s Project Manager and Local Agency’s Contract Administrator, three competitive quotations must be submitted with the request, or the absence of proposal must be adequately justified.

C. Any equipment purchased with funds provided under the terms of this Contract is subject to the following:
a. Consultant shall maintain an inventory of all nonexpendable property.

Nonexpendable property is defined as having a useful life of at least two years and an acquisition cost of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or more. If the purchased equipment needs replacement and is sold or traded in, Local Agency shall receive a proper refund or credit at the conclusion of the Contract, or if the Contract is terminated, Consultant may either keep the equipment and credit Local Agency in an amount equal to its fair market value, or sell such equipment at the best price obtainable at a public or private sale, in accordance with 564
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 9 rev 12/4/23
established Local Agency and SACOG procedures; and credit Local Agency in an amount equal to the sales price. If Consultant elects to keep the equipment, fair market value shall be determined at Consultant’s expense, on the basis of a competent independent appraisal of such equipment. Appraisals shall be obtained from an appraiser mutually agreeable to by SACOG, Local Agency, and Consultant, if it is determined to sell the equipment, the terms and conditions of such sale must be approved in advance by SACOG and Local Agency. b. Regulation 2 CFR 200 requires a credit to Federal funds when participating equipment with a fair market value greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) is credited to the project.
c. All subcontracts in excess $25,000 shall contain the above provisions.

6. PROMPT PAYMENT FROM LOCAL AGENCY TO CONSULTANT
A. The Local Agency shall make all project progress payment within 30 days after receipt of an undisputed and properly submitted payment request from Consultant on a professional service contract. If the Local Agency fails to pay promptly, the Local Agency shall pay interest to the Consultant, which accrues at the rate of 10 percent per annum on the principal amount of a money judgment remaining unsatisfied and pro-rated as necessary. Upon receipt of the payment request, the Local Agency shall act in accordance with both of the following:
(1) The Local Agency shall review each payment request as soon as feasible after receipt to verify it is a proper payment request.
(2) The Local Agency must return any payment request deemed improper by the Local Agency to the Consultant as soon as feasible, but not later than seven (7) days, after receipt. A request returned pursuant to this paragraph shall include documentation setting forth in writing the reasons why it is an improper payment request.

B. Prompt Payment Certification
(1) The Consultant must submit Exhibit 9-P to the Local Agency administering the contract by the 15th of the month following the month of any payment(s). If the Consultant does not make any payments to subconsultants, supplier(s), and/or manufacturers they must report “no payments were made to subs this month” and write this visibly and legibly on Exhibit 9-P.
(2) The Local Agency must verify all Exhibit 9-P information, monitor compliance with prompt payment requirements for DBE and non-DBE firms, and address any shortfalls to the DBE commitment and prompt payment issues until the end of the project. The Local Agency must email a copy of Exhibit 9-P to [email protected] before the end of the month after receiving the Exhibit 9-P from the Consultant.
565
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 10 rev 12/4/23

7. TERMINATION
A. This Contract may be terminated by either party, provided that the other party is given not less than 10 calendar days’ written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate.

B. The City may temporarily suspend this Contract, at no additional cost to City, provided that the Consultant is given written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of temporary suspension. If City gives such notice of temporary suspension, Consultant shall immediately suspend its activities under this Contract.

C. Notwithstanding any provisions of this Contract, Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Contract by Consultant, and the City may withhold any payments due to Consultant until such time as the exact amount of damages, if any, due the City from Consultant is determined.

D. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be compensated as provided for in this Contract, except as provided in Section 7.C. Upon termination, the City shall be entitled to all work, including but not limited to, appraisals, inventories, studies, analyses, drawings and data estimates performed to that date in accordance with Section 11 hereof.

E. Additional provisions under Exhibit F.

8. AMENDMENTS, CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS
A. Amendments, changes or modifications in the terms of this Contract may be made at any time by mutual written agreement between the parties hereto and shall be signed by the persons authorized to bind the parties hereto.

B. Consultant shall only commence work covered by an amendment after the amendment is executed and notification to proceed has been provided by Local Agency’s Contract Administrator.

C. There shall be no change in Consultant’s Project Manager or members of the project team, as listed in the approved Cost Proposal, which is a part of this Contract without prior written approval by Local Agency’s Contract Administrator.

9. EXTENSIONS OF TIME
A. Consultant may, for good cause, request extensions of time to perform the services required hereunder. Such extensions shall be authorized in advance by the City in writing and shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Contract or the attached Work Program in the manner provided in Section 8.

10. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
A. It is mutually understood between the parties that this Contract may have been written before ascertaining the availability of funds or appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of both parties, in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would occur if the Contract were executed after that determination was made. 566
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 11 rev 12/4/23
B. This Contract is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made available to Local Agency for the purpose of this Contract. In addition, this Contract is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations, conditions, or any statute enacted by the Congress, State Legislature, or Local Agency governing board that may affect the provisions, terms, or funding of this Contract in any manner.

C. It is mutually agreed that if sufficient funds are not appropriated, this Contract may be amended to reflect any reduction in funds.

D. Local Agency has the option to terminate the Contract pursuant to Section 7 Termination, or by mutual agreement to amend the Contract to reflect any reduction of funds.

11. PROPERTY OF CITY
A. It is mutually agreed that all materials prepared by the Consultant under this Contract shall become the property of the City, and the Consultant shall have no property right therein whatsoever. Immediately upon termination, the City shall be entitled to, and the Consultant shall deliver to the City, all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and other such materials as may have been prepared or accumulated to date by the Consultant in performing this Contract which is not Consultant’s privileged information, as defined by law, or Consultant’s personnel information, along with all other property belonging exclusively to the City which is in the Consultant’s possession.

12. RECORD RETENTION
A. In addition to the reports specified in this Contract, Consultant shall retain the records required by the applicable provisions of 2 CFR § 200.333, no less than three (3) years after City's final payment to Consultant under this Contract, Final Voucher received from Caltrans, and provide the City with the reports required pursuant to 2 CFR §§ 200.328 and 200.343, and such other records and reports as the City may reasonably require in the administration of this Contract. Consultant shall keep all other necessary books and records, including property, personnel, loan documentation and financial records, in connection with the operation and services performed under this Contract, in accordance with 2 CFR §200.333.

B. For the purpose of determining compliance with Gov. Code §8546.7, the Consultant, Subconsultants, and Local Agency shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records, Independent CPA Audited Indirect Cost Rate workpapers, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of the Contract including, but not limited to, the costs of administering the Contract. All parties, including the Consultant’s Independent CPA, shall make such workpapers and material available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the Contract period and for three (3) years from the date of final payment under the Contract and records for real property and equipment acquired with federal funds must be retained for three (3) years after final disposition. Local Agency, Caltrans Auditor, FHWA, or any duly authorized representative of the Federal government having jurisdiction under Federal laws or regulations (including the basis of Federal funding in whole or in part) shall have access to any books, records, and are pertinent to the Contract for audits, examinations, workpaper review, excerpts, and transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested without limitation. 567
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 12 rev 12/4/23

13. AUDIT/AUDIT REVIEW
A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this Contract that is not disposed of by Contract, shall be reviewed by Local Agency’s Chief Financial Officer.

B. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, Consultant may request a review by Local Agency’s Chief Financial Officer of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing.

C. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by Local Agency will excuse Consultant from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this Contract.

D. Consultant and subconsultant Contracts, including cost proposals and indirect Cost Rates (ICR), may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an Contract audit, an incurred cost audit, an ICR Audit, or a CPA ICR audit work paper review. If selected for audit or review, the Contract, cost proposal and ICR and related work papers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR audit work paper review it is Consultant’s responsibility to ensure federal, Local Agency, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s work papers including making copies as necessary.

The Contract, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by Consultant and approved by Local Agency Contract Administrator to conform to the audit or review recommendations. Consultant agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the Contract by this reference if directed by Local Agency at its sole discretion. Refusal by Consultant to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, Local Agency or local governments have access to CPA work papers, will be considered a breach of Contract terms and cause for termination of the Contract and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

E. Consultant’s Cost Proposal may be subject to a CPA ICR Audit Work Paper Review and/or audit by the Independent Office of Audits and Investigations (IOAI). IOAI, at its sole discretion, may review and/or audit and approve the CPA ICR documentation. The Cost Proposal shall be adjusted by the Consultant and approved by the Local Agency Contract Administrator to conform to the Work Paper Review recommendations included in the management letter or audit recommendations included in the audit report. Refusal by the Consultant to incorporate the Work Paper Review recommendations included in the management letter or audit recommendations included in the audit report will be considered a breach of the Contract terms and cause for termination of the Contract and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

1. During IOAI’s review of the ICR audit work papers created by the Consultant’s independent CPA, IOAI will work with the CPA and/or Consultant toward a resolution of issues that arise during the review. Each party agrees to use its best efforts to resolve any audit disputes in a timely manner. If IOAI identifies significant issues during the review and is unable to issue a cognizant approval letter, Local Agency will reimburse the Consultant at an accepted ICR until a FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulation) compliant ICR (e.g. 48 CFR Part 31; GAGAS (Generally Accepted Auditing Standards); CAS (Cost Accounting Standards), if applicable; in accordance with procedures and guidelines of the American 568
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 13 rev 12/4/23
Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Audit Guide; and other applicable procedures and guidelines) is received and approved by IOAI.

Accepted rates will be as follows:
a. If the proposed rate is less than one hundred fifty percent (150%) - the accepted rate reimbursed will be ninety percent (90%) of the proposed rate.
b. If the proposed rate is between one hundred fifty percent (150%) and two hundred percent (200%) - the accepted rate will be eighty-five percent (85%) of the proposed rate.
c. If the proposed rate is greater than two hundred percent (200%) - the accepted rate will be seventy-five percent (75%) of the proposed rate.

2. If IOAI is unable to issue a cognizant letter per paragraph E.1. above, IOAI may require Consultant to submit a revised independent CPA-audited ICR and audit report within three (3) months of the effective date of the management letter.

IOAI will then have up to six (6) months to review the Consultant’s and/or the independent CPA’s revisions.

3. If the Consultant fails to comply with the provisions of this paragraph E, or if IOAI is still unable to issue a cognizant approval letter after the revised independent CPA audited ICR is submitted, overhead cost reimbursement will be limited to the accepted ICR that was established upon initial rejection of the ICR and set forth in paragraph E.1. above for all rendered services. In this event, this accepted ICR will become the actual and final ICR for reimbursement purposes under this Contract.

4. Consultant may submit to Local Agency final invoice only when all of the following items have occurred: (1) IOAI accepts or adjusts the original or revised independent CPA audited ICR; (2) all work under this Contract has been completed to the satisfaction of Local Agency; and, (3) IOAI has issued its final ICR review letter. The Consultant MUST SUBMIT ITS FINAL INVOICE TO Local Agency no later than sixty (60) calendar days after occurrence of the last of these items. The accepted ICR will apply to this Contract and all other agreements executed between Local Agency and the Consultant, either as a prime or subconsultant, with the same fiscal period ICR.

14. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS:

A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of federal, State and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Contract.

B. Consultant warrants to the City that it is licensed by all applicable governmental bodies to perform this Contract and will remain so licensed throughout the progress of the Work, and that it has, and will have, throughout the progress of the Work, the necessary experience, skill and financial resources to enable it to perform this Contract. 569
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 14 rev 12/4/23
C. The work contemplated under this Contract is a public work for the purposes of Labor Code section 1720, and is subject to the payment of prevailing wages. Accordingly, Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Exhibit "D".

D. Contract is funded in whole in part through grant funds received under the following grant[s]: Reconnecting Communities & Neighborhoods Program, Contract #: CT250029 with the Sacramento Area Council of Governments, dated April 14, 2025 (the “Grant”), the terms of which are incorporated by reference to the grant program. Copies of the Grant and any related materials have been made available to Consultant, and Consultant shall ensure that its performance under this Contract, and that of any subcontractors, conforms to the requirements of the Grant. These requirements include, but are not necessarily limited to, compliance with the terms set forth in the provisions of this contract.

Accordingly, Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Exhibit "H".

15. WARRANTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - CONSULTANT
A. Consultant agrees and represents that it is qualified to properly provide the services set forth in Exhibit “A” in a manner which is consistent with the generally accepted standards of Consultant’s profession.

B. Consultant agrees and represents that the work performed under this Contract shall be in accordance with applicable federal, State and local law in accordance with Section 31.A. hereof.

C. Consultant shall designate a project manager who at all times shall represent the Consultant before the City on all matters relating to this Contract. The project manager shall continue in such capacity unless and until he or she is removed at the request of the City, is no longer employed by Consultant, or is replaced with the written approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.

D. Consultant shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for services which fail to meet the above professional and legal standards and which are reported to Consultant in writing within sixty (60) days of discovery. Should Consultant fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations, the City may render or undertake performance thereof and the Consultant shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred.

16. SUBCONTRACTING
A. None of the services covered by this Contract shall be subcontracted without the prior written consent of the City, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Consultant shall be as fully responsible to the City for the negligent acts and omissions of its contractors and subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as it is for the negligent acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant.

B. Nothing contained in this Contract or otherwise, shall create any contractual relation between the Local Agency and any Subconsultants, and no subagreement shall relieve the Consultant of its responsibilities and obligations hereunder. The Consultant agrees to be as fully responsible to the Local Agency for the acts and omissions of its Subconsultants and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by any of them as it is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by the Consultant. The 570
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 15 rev 12/4/23
Consultant's obligation to pay its Subconsultants is an independent obligation from the Local Agency's obligation to make payments to the Consultant.

C. The Consultant shall perform the work contemplated with resources available within its own organization and no portion of the work shall be subcontracted without written authorization by the Local Agency Contract Administrator, except that which is expressly identified in the Consultant’s approved Cost Proposal.

D. Any subagreement entered into as a result of this Contract, shall contain all the provisions stipulated in this entire Contract to be applicable to Subconsultants unless otherwise noted.

E. Consultant shall pay its Subconsultants within fifteen (15) calendar days from receipt of each payment made to the Consultant by the Local Agency.

F. Any substitution of Subconsultants must be approved in writing by the Local Agency Contract Administrator in advance of assigning work to a substitute Subconsultant.

17. PROMPT PROGRESS PAYMENT
A. Contract is funded in whole in part through grant funds received under the following grant[s]: Reconnecting Communities & Neighborhoods Program, Contract #: CT250029 with the Sacramento Area Council of Governments, dated April 14, 2025 (the “Grant” or “Subrecipient Agreement”), the terms of which are incorporated by reference to the grant program. Accordingly, Consultant shall comply with the provisions of the Subrecipient Agreement as applicable, provided in Exhibit "H". If any clauses in the agreement conflict with the Subrecipient Agreement, then the Subrecipient Agreement controls.

Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary, Consultant or subconsultant shall pay to any subconsultant, not later than fifteen (15) days after receipt of each progress payment, unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the respective amounts allowed Consultant on account of the work performed by the subconsultants, to the extent of each subconsultant’s interest therein.

B. Consultant or subconsultant shall pay to any subconsultant, not later than fifteen (15) days after receipt of each progress payment, unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the respective amounts allowed Consultant on account of the work performed by the subconsultants, to the extent of each subconsultant’s interest therein. In the event that there is a good faith dispute over all or any portion of the amount due on a progress payment from Consultant or subconsultant to a subconsultant, Consultant or subconsultant may withhold no more than 150 percent of the disputed amount. Any violation of this requirement shall constitute a cause for disciplinary action and shall subject the licensee to a penalty, payable to the subconsultant, of 2 percent of the amount due per month for every month that payment is not made.

In any action for the collection of funds wrongfully withheld, the prevailing party shall be entitled to his or her attorney’s fees and costs. The sanctions authorized under this requirement shall be separate from, and in addition to, all other remedies, either civil, administrative, or criminal. This clause applies to both DBE and non-DBE subconsultants.

C. Prompt Payment of Withheld Funds to Subconsultants
571
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 16 rev 12/4/23
The Local Agency may hold retainage from Consultant and shall make prompt and regular incremental acceptances of portions, as determined by the Local Agency, of the contract work, and pay retainage to Consultant based on these acceptances. The Local Agency shall designate one of the methods below in the contract to ensure prompt and full payment of any retainage kept by Consultant or subconsultant to a subconsultant.

D. No retainage will be held by the Local Agency from progress payments due to Consultant.

Any retainage kept by Consultant or by a subconsultant must be paid in full to the earning subconsultant within 15 days after the subconsultant’s work is satisfactorily completed.

Any delay or postponement of payment may take place only for good cause and with the Local Agency’s prior written approval. Any violation of these provisions shall subject the violating Consultant or subconsultant to the penalties, sanctions, and remedies specified in Section 3321 of the California Civil Code. This requirement shall not be construed to limit or impair any contractual, administrative or judicial remedies, otherwise available to Consultant or subconsultant in the event of a dispute involving late payment or nonpayment by Consultant, deficient subconsultant performance and/or noncompliance by a subconsultant. This clause applies to both DBE and non-DBE subconsultants.

18. ASSIGNABILITY
A. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Contract whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of the City which will not be unreasonably withheld. However, claims for money due or to become due Consultant from the City under this Contract may be assigned to a financial institution, or to a trustee in bankruptcy, without such approval. Notice of any assignment or transfer whether voluntary or involuntary shall be furnished promptly to the City.

19. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (DBE) PARTICIPATION A. Contract is funded in whole in part through grant funds received under the following grant[s]: Reconnecting Communities & Neighborhoods Program, Contract #: CT250029 with the Sacramento Area Council of Governments, dated April 14, 2025 (the “Grant”), the terms of which are incorporated by reference to the grant program. Accordingly, Consultant shall comply with the provisions of the Subrecipient Agreement as applicable, provided in Exhibit "H".

B. In response to the Interim Final Rule (IFR) regarding 49 CFR Parts 23 and 26, the Disadvantaged Business Program (DBE) has been temporarily suspended on October 3, 2025. During the temporary suspension, there will be no contract goals, no Good Faith Effort Documentation; no counting of DBE participation, no monitoring of DBE program compliance, and no DBE forms submission. As such, there is no Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) participation goal for this Contract.

The City retains the right to amend this Contract, if and when the DBE requirements are reassessed and new obligations are imposed.

20. INTEREST IN CONTRACT
A. Consultant warrants, by execution of this Contract that no person or selling agency has been employed, or retained, to solicit or secure this Contract upon an agreement or 572
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 17 rev 12/4/23
understanding, for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees, or bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by Consultant for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty, Local Agency has the right to annul this Contract without liability; pay only for the value of the work actually performed, or in its discretion to deduct from the Contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee.

B. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any of its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the subject of the Contract, nor any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its services hereunder. Consultant shall make all disclosures required by the City’s conflict of interest code in accordance with the category designated by the City, unless the City Manager determines in writing that Consultant’s duties are more limited in scope than is warranted by the category designated by the City code and that a narrower disclosure category should apply. Consultant also agrees to make disclosure in compliance with the City conflict of interest code if, at any time after the execution of this Contract, City determines and notifies Consultant in writing that Consultant’s duties under this Contract warrant greater disclosure by Consultant than was originally contemplated. Consultant shall make disclosures in the time, place and manner set forth in the conflict of interest code and as directed by the City.

C. During the term of this Contract, the Consultant shall disclose any financial, business, or other relationship with Local Agency that may have an impact upon the outcome of this Contract or any ensuing Local Agency construction project. The Consultant shall also list current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome of this Contract or any ensuing Local Agency construction project which will follow.

D. Consultant certifies that it has disclosed to Local Agency any actual, apparent, or potential conflicts of interest that may exist relative to the services to be provided pursuant to this Contract. Consultant agrees to advise Local Agency of any actual, apparent or potential conflicts of interest that may develop subsequent to the date of execution of this Contract.

Consultant further agrees to complete any statements of economic interest if required by either Local Agency ordinance or State law.

E. The Consultant hereby certifies that it does not now have, nor shall it acquire any financial or business interest that would conflict with the performance of services under this Contract.

F. The Consultant hereby certifies that the Consultant or subconsultant and any firm affiliated with the Consultant or subconsultant that bids on any construction contract or on any agreement to provide construction inspection for any construction project resulting from this Contract, has established necessary controls to ensure a conflict of interest does not exist. An affiliated firm is one, which is subject to the control of the same persons, through joint ownership or otherwise.

21. MATERIALS CONFIDENTIAL
A. All of the materials prepared or assembled by Consultant pursuant to performance of this Contract are confidential and Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City, except by court 573
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 18 rev 12/4/23
order.

B. All financial, statistical, personal, technical, or other data and information relative to Local Agency’s operations, which are designated confidential by Local Agency and made available to Consultant in order to carry out this Contract, shall be protected by Consultant from unauthorized use and disclosure.

C. Permission to disclose information on one occasion, or public hearing held by Local Agency relating to the Contract, shall not authorize Consultant to further disclose such information, or disseminate the same on any other occasion.

D. Consultant shall not comment publicly to the press or any other media regarding the Contract or Local Agency’s actions on the same, except to Local Agency’s staff, Consultant’s own personnel involved in the performance of this Contract, at public hearings, or in response to questions from a Legislative committee.

E. Consultant shall not issue any news release or public relations item of any nature, whatsoever, regarding work performed or to be performed under this Contract without prior review of the contents thereof by Local Agency, and receipt of Local Agency’s written permission.

F. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract shall contain all of the provisions of this section.

22. LIABILITY OF CONSULTANT-NEGLIGENCE
A. Consultant shall be responsible for performing the work under this Contract in a manner which is consistent with the generally-accepted standards of the Consultant’s profession and shall be liable for its own negligence and the negligent acts of its employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors. The City shall have no right of control over the manner in which the work is to be done but only as to its outcome, and shall not be charged with the responsibility of preventing risk to Consultant or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors.

23. INDEMNITY AND LITIGATION COSTS
A. Consultant shall protect, hold free and harmless, defend and indemnify the City, its consultants, and each of their officers, employees and agents, from any and all liability, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims or judgments, including attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its employees or anyone else employed by the Consultant in the performance of professional design services under this agreement, to the extent of the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

B. To the extent permitted by Civil Code section 2782.8, for all other claims unrelated to the provision of professional design services, the Consultant shall protect, hold free and harmless, defend and indemnify the City, its consultants, and each of their officers, employees and agents, from any and all liability, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims or judgments, including attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation, which arise out of or are in any way connected with the Consultant’s, or its 574
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 19 rev 12/4/23
subcontractors’ or suppliers’, performance under this agreement or failure to comply with any of the obligations contained in the agreement. This indemnity shall imply no reciprocal right of the Consultant in any action on the agreement pursuant to California Civil Code section 1717 or section 1717.5. To the fullest extent legally permissible, this indemnity, defense and hold harmless agreement by the Consultant shall apply to any and all acts or omissions unrelated to the provision of professional design services, whether active or passive, on the part of the Consultant or its agents, employees, representatives, or subcontractor’s agents, employees and representatives, resulting in claim or liability, irrespective of whether or not any acts or omissions of the parties to be indemnified hereunder may also have been a contributing factor to the liability, except such loss or damage which was caused by the active negligence, the sole negligence, or the willful misconduct of the City.

24. CLAIMS FILED BY LOCAL AGENCY’S CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR A. If claims are filed by Local Agency’s construction contractor relating to work performed by Consultant’s personnel, and additional information or assistance from Consultant’s personnel is required in order to evaluate or defend against such claims; Consultant agrees to make its personnel available for consultation with Local Agency’s construction contract administration and legal staff and for testimony, if necessary, at depositions and at trial or arbitration proceedings.

B. Consultant’s personnel that Local Agency considers essential to assist in defending against construction contractor claims will be made available on reasonable notice from Local Agency Consultation or testimony will be reimbursed at the same rates, including travel costs that are being paid for Consultant’s personnel services under this Contract.

C. Services of Consultant’s personnel in connection with Local Agency’s construction contractor claims will be performed pursuant to a written contract amendment, if necessary, extending the termination date of this Contract in order to resolve the construction claim.

25. DISPUTES
A. Prior to either party commencing any legal action under this Contract, the parties agree to try in good faith, to settle any dispute amicably between them. If a dispute has not been settled after forty-five (45) days of good-faith negotiations and as may be otherwise provided herein, then either party may commence legal action against the other.

B. Any dispute, other than audit, concerning a question of fact arising under this Contract that is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by a committee consisting of Local Agency’s Contract Administrator and Community Development Director, who may consider written or verbal information submitted by Consultant.

C. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after completion of all work under the Contract, Consultant may request review by Local Agency Governing Board of unresolved claims or disputes, other than audit. The request for review will be submitted in writing.

D. Neither the pendency of a dispute, nor its consideration by the committee will excuse Consultant from full and timely performance in accordance with the terms of this Contract.
575
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 20 rev 12/4/23

26. CONSULTANT TO PROVIDE INSURANCE
A. Consultant shall not commence any work before obtaining, and shall maintain in force at all times during the duration and performance of this Contract, the policies of insurance specified in this Section. Such insurance must have the approval of the City as to limit, form, and amount, and shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A VII (an NR rating is acceptable for Worker’s Compensation insurance written with the State Compensation Insurance Fund of California).

B. Prior to execution of this Contract and prior to commencement of any work, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and copies of endorsements providing evidence of coverage for all policies required by the Contract.

The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall, at their expense, maintain in effect at all times during the performance of work under the Contract not less than the following coverage and limits of insurance, which shall be maintained with insurers and under forms of policy satisfactory to the City. The maintenance by Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors of the following coverage and limits of insurance is a material element of this Contract. The failure of Consultant or of any of its contractors or subcontractors to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of this Contract. Approval of the insurance by the City shall not relieve or decrease any liability of Consultant.

1. Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance a. Worker’s Compensation - Insurance to protect the Consultant, its contractors and subcontractors from all claims under Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Acts, including Longshoremen’s and Harbor Worker’s Act (“Acts”), if applicable. Such coverage shall be maintained, in type and amount, in strict compliance with all applicable state and Federal statutes and regulations. The Consultant shall execute a certificate in compliance with Labor Code Section 1861, on the form provided in the Contract Documents. b. Consultant shall provide a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant.

2. Commercial General Liability Insurance
a. The insurance shall be provided on form CG0001, or its equivalent, and shall include coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage arising out of premises/operations, products/completed operations, contractual liability, and subconsultant’s work and personal and advertising injury resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 general and products/completed operations aggregates. b. The commercial general liability insurance shall also include the following:
576
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 21 rev 12/4/23
i. Endorsement equivalent to CG 2010 0714 naming the
City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds. The endorsement shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
ii. Endorsement stating insurance provided to the City shall be primary as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it, to the payment or satisfaction of any defense expenses, loss, or judgment.
iii. Provision or endorsement stating that the Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

3. Commercial Automobile Insurance
a. The insurance shall include, but shall not be limited to, coverage for claims for bodily injury or property damage for owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles resulting from actions, failures to act, or operations of the insured, or by its employees or agents, or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the insured. The amount of insurance coverage shall not be less than $2,000,000 per accident.
b. The commercial automobile insurance shall include the same endorsements required for the commercial general liability policy (see Section

26.B.2.b).

4. Professional Liability
The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall secure and maintain in full force, during the term of this Contract and for five years thereafter, professional liability insurance policies appropriate to the respective professions and the work to be performed as specified in this Contract. The limits of such professional liability insurance coverage shall not be less than $2,000,000 per claim.

5. Unemployment Insurance and Disability Insurance
The Consultant and its contractors and subcontractors shall secure and maintain in full force, during the term of this Contract and for five years thereafter, unemployment insurance and disability insurance as required by law.

C. In addition to any other remedy the City may have, if Consultant fails to maintain the insurance coverage as required in this Section, the City may obtain such insurance coverage as is not being maintained, in form and amount substantially the same as is required herein, and the City may deduct the cost of such insurance from any amounts due or which may become due Consultant under this Contract. 577
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 22 rev 12/4/23
D. No policy required by this Contract shall be suspended, cancelled, terminated by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits unless Consultant has provided thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City.

E. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions in excess of $10,000 must be declared to, and approved by, the City.

F. The requirement as to types, limits, and the City’s approval of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant are not intended to, and shall not in any manner, limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations assumed by Consultant under the Contract.

27. NON-DISCRIMINATION CLAUSE AND STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE A. The Consultant’s signature affixed herein and dated shall constitute a certification under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Consultant has, unless exempt, complied with the nondiscrimination program requirements of Gov. Code §12990 and 2 CCR § 8103.

B. During the performance of this Contract, Consultant and its subconsultants shall not deny the Contract’s benefits to any person on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status, nor shall they unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status. Consultant and subconsultants shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment.

C. Consultant and subconsultants shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code §12990 et seq.), the applicable regulations promulgated there under (2 CCR §11000 et seq.), the provisions of Gov. Code §§11135-11139.5, and the regulations or standards adopted by Local Agency to implement such article. The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Gov. Code §12990 (a-f), set forth 2 CCR §§8100-8504, are incorporated into this Contract by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full.

D. Consultant shall permit access by representatives of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and the Local Agency upon reasonable notice at any time during the normal business hours, but in no case less than twenty-four (24) hours’ notice, to such of its books, records, accounts, and all other sources of information and its facilities as said Department or Local Agency shall require to ascertain compliance with this clause.

E. Consultant and its subconsultants shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement.

F. Consultant shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under this Contract. 578
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 23 rev 12/4/23
G. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed under this Contract, shall act in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §2000d et seq.). Title VI provides that the recipients of federal assistance will implement and maintain a policy of nondiscrimination in which no person in the United States shall, on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, disability, be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of or subject to discrimination under any program or activity by the recipients of federal assistance or their assignees and successors in interest.

H. The Consultant shall comply with regulations relative to non-discrimination in federallyassisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation (49 CFR 21 - Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). Specifically, the Consultant shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by 49 CFR §21.5, including employment practices and the selection and retention of Subconsultants.

I. Consultant, subrecipient or subconsultant will never exclude any person from participation in, deny any person the benefits of, or otherwise discriminate against anyone in connection with the award and performance of any contract covered by 49 CFR 26 on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin. In administering the Local Agency components of the DBE Program Plan, Consultant, subrecipient or subconsultant will not, directly, or through contractual or other arrangements, use criteria or methods of administration that have the effect of defeating or substantially impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the DBE Program Plan with respect to individuals of a particular race, color, sex, or national origin.

28. TITLE VI ASSURANCES
APPENDICES A - E of the TITLE VI ASSURANCES
The U.S. Department of Transportation Order No.1050.2A requires all federal-aid Department of Transportation contracts between an agency and a consultant to contain Appendices A and E of the Title VI Assurances. Include Appendices B, C, and D if appliable (ROW acquisition involved) as shown below.

In addition, the Consultant must include the Title VI Assurances Appendices A and E, and if applicable Appendices B, C, and D in all subcontracts to perform work under the contract. The clauses of Appendix B of this Assurance shall be included as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property, structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a Local Agency.

The clauses set forth in Appendix C and Appendix D of this Assurance shall be included as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, licenses, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the Local Agency with other parties:
a. for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program; and
b. for the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program.]

APPENDIX A
579
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 24 rev 12/4/23
During the performance of this Contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest (hereinafter collectively referred to as Consultant) agrees as follows:

Compliance with Regulations: Consultant shall comply with the regulations relative to nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred to as the REGULATIONS), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement.

Nondiscrimination: Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it during the Contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, national origin, religion, age, or disability in the selection and retention of sub-applicants, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. Consultant shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the agreement covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations.

Solicitations for Sub-agreements, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by Consultant for work to be performed under a Sub- agreement, including procurements of materials or leases of equipment, each potential sub-applicant or supplier shall be notified by Consultant of the Consultant’s obligations under this Contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.

Information and Reports: Consultant shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the recipient or FHWA to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations or directives. Where any information required of Consultant is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, Consultant shall so certify to the recipient or FHWA as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts Consultant has made to obtain the information.

Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of Consultant’s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this agreement, the recipient shall impose such agreement sanctions as it or the FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
i. withholding of payments to Consultant under the Contract within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 90 days; and/or
ii. cancellation, termination or suspension of the Contract, in whole or in part Incorporation of Provisions: Consultant shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (6) in every sub-agreement, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto. Consultant shall take such action with respect to any sub-agreement or procurement as the recipient or FHWA may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance, provided, however, that, in the event Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a sub-applicant or supplier as a result of such direction, Consultant may request the recipient enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the State, and, in addition, Consultant may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.
580
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 25 rev 12/4/23

APPENDIX B

CLAUSES FOR DEEDS TRANSFERRING UNITED STATES PROPERTY
The following clauses will be included in deeds effecting or recording the transfer of real property, structures, or improvements thereon, or granting interest therein from the United States pursuant to the provisions of Assurance 4:

NOW THEREFORE, the U.S. Department of Transportation as authorized by law and upon the condition that the recipient will accept title to the lands and maintain the project constructed hereon in accordance with Title 23 U.S.C., the regulations for the administration of the preceding statute, and the policies and procedures prescribed by the FHWA of the U.S.

Department of Transportation in accordance and in compliance with all requirements imposed by Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the U.S.

Department of Transportation pertaining to and effectuating the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252; 42 U.S.C. § 2000d to 2000d-4), does hereby remise, release, quitclaim and convey unto the recipient all the right, title and interest of the U.S. Department of Transportation in and to said lands described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
(HABENDUM CLAUSE)
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said lands and interests therein unto the recipient and its successors forever, subject, however, to the covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations herein contained as follows, which will remain in effect for the period during which the real property or structures are used for a purpose for which Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits and will be binding on the recipient, its successors and assigns. The recipient, in consideration of the conveyance of said lands and interest in lands, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land for itself, its successors and assigns, that (1) no person will on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination with regard to any facility located wholly or in part on, over, or under such lands hereby conveyed [,] [and]* (2) that the recipient will use the lands and interests in lands and interest in lands so conveyed, in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations and Acts may be amended [, and (3) that in the event of breach of any of the above-mentioned non-discrimination conditions, the Department will have a right to enter or re-enter said lands and facilities on said lands, and that above described land and facilities will thereon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the U.S. Department of Transportation and its assigns as such interest existed prior to this instruction].* (*Reverter clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary in order to make clear the purpose of Title VI.)

APPENDIX C

CLAUSES FOR TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY ACQUIRED OR IMPROVED UNDER THE

ACTIVITY, FACILITY, OR PROGRAM
581
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 26 rev 12/4/23
The following clauses will be included in deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the recipient pursuant to the provisions of Assurance 7(a):

A. The (grantee, lessee, permittee, etc. as appropriate) for himself/herself, his/her heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree [in the case of deeds and leases add “as a covenant running with the land”] that:

1. In the event facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the property described in this (deed, license, lease, permit, etc.) for a purpose for which a U.S. Department of Transportation activity, facility, or program is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the (grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee, etc.) will maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Acts and Regulations(as may be amended) such that no person on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities.

B. With respect to licenses, leases, permits, etc., in the event of breach of any of the above Non-discrimination covenants, the recipient will have the right to terminate the (lease, license, permit, etc.) and to enter, re-enter, and repossess said lands and facilities thereon, and hold the same as if the (lease, license, permit, etc.) had never been made or issued.*
C. With respect to a deed, in the event of breach of any of the above Non-discrimination covenants, the recipient will have the right to enter or re-enter the lands and facilities thereon, and the above described lands and facilities will there upon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the recipient and its assigns.* (*Reverter clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary to make clear the purpose of Title VI.)

APPENDIX D

CLAUSES FOR CONSTRUCTION/USE/ACCESS TO REAL PROPERTY ACQUIRED UNDER

THE ACTIVITY, FACILITY OR PROGRAM
The following clauses will be included in deeds, licenses, permits, or similar instruments/agreements entered into by the recipient pursuant to the provisions of Assurance 7(b):

A. The (grantee, licensee, permittee, etc., as appropriate) for himself/herself, his/her heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest ,and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree (in the case of deeds and leases add, “as a covenant running with the land”) that (1) no person on the ground of race, color, or national origin, will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities, (2) that in the construction of any improvements on over, or under such land, and the furnishings of services thereon, no person on the ground of race, color, or national origin, will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits or, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination, (3) that the (grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee, etc.) will use the 582
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 27 rev 12/4/23
premises in compliance with all other requirements imposed by or pursuant to the Acts and Regulations, as amended, set forth in this Assurance.

B. With respect to (licenses, leases, permits, etc.) in the event of breach of any of the above of the above Non-discrimination covenants, the recipient will have the right to terminate the (license, permits, etc., as appropriate) and to enter or re-enter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said (license, permit, etc., as appropriate) had never been made or issued.* C. With respect to deeds, in the event of breach of any of the above Nondiscrimination covenants, the recipient will there upon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the recipient and its assigns.

APPENDIX E
During the performance of this contract, the Consultant, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”) agrees to comply with the following nondiscrimination statutes and authorities, including, but not limited to:

Pertinent Non-Discrimination Authorities:
• Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); and 49 CFR Part 21. • The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. § 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects); • Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. § 324 et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex;
• Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CR Part 27; • The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
• Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 U.S.C. § 471, Section 47123), as amended, (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); • The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activities” to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, sub-recipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not);
• Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination of the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, place public accommodation, and certain testing entities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 – 583
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 28 rev 12/4/23
12189) as implemented by Department of Transportation regulations 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38;
• The Federal Aviation Administration’s Non-discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. § 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex); • Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, which ensures discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations;
• Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of Limited English Proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to 74100); • Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C.1681 et seq).

29. CONTRACT: ENTIRE AGREEMENT
A. This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relative to the services specified herein and no modification hereof shall be effective unless and until such modification is evidenced by a writing signed by both parties to this Contract.

There are no understandings, agreements, conditions, representations, warranties or promises, with respect to this Contract, except those contained in or referred to in the writing.

30. NOTICE
A. All notices that are required to be given by one party to the other under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered personally or enclosed in a properly addressed envelope and deposited in a United States Post Office for delivery by registered or certified mail addressed to the parties at the following addresses:

City: Community Development Department
ATTN: Stephanie Chhan, Senior Transportation Planner
City of West Sacramento
1110 West Capitol Avenue, 2nd Floor
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Email: [email protected]
Consultant: Dokken Engineering
584
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 29 rev 12/4/23
ATTN: Pamela Dalcin-Walling, Project Manager
110 Blue Ravine Rd, Ste 200
Folsom, CA 95630
Email: [email protected]

31. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:

A. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of, shall observe and comply with, and shall cause any and all persons, firms or corporations employed by it or under its control to observe and comply with, applicable federal, state, county and municipal laws, ordinances, regulations, orders and decrees which in any manner affect those engaged or employed on the work described by this Contract or the materials used or which in any way affect the conduct of the work.

B. This Contract shall be interpreted and governed by the laws of the State of California.

C. Any action arising out of this Contract shall be brought and maintained in Yolo County California, regardless of where else venue may lie.

D. In any action brought by either party to enforce the terms of this Contract, each party shall be bear responsibility for its attorney’s fees and all costs regardless of whether one party is determined to be the prevailing party.

E. Consultant and any subconsultant shall permit Local Agency, the State, and the FHWA if federal participating funds are used in this Contract; to review and inspect the project activities and files at all reasonable times during the performance period of this Contract
F. This Contract may be signed in counterparts, and may be signed electronically.

By signing this document in electronic form, the parties agree that this Contract may be transmitted and signed electronically by all Parties, and that such signatures shall have the same force and effect as original signatures, in accordance with California law and regulations, including but not limited to Civil Code section 1633.7.

585
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 30 rev 12/4/23

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO
By: __________________________
Amanda Berlin, Assistant City Manager
ATTEST:

By: _________________________________
Jennifer Cusmir, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: __________________________________
Jeffrey Mitchell, City Attorney
Dokken Engineering
By: _________________________
John A. Klemunes, Jr., President
586
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 31 rev 12/4/23
EXHIBIT A – CONSULTANT PROPOSAL/SCOPE OF WORK
587
Scope of Work
MILESTONE 1: FEASIBILITY STUDY
TASK 1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Task 1.1 Project Management Plan/Quality Control
CONSULTANT shall prepare a Project Management Plan for Milestone 1 that includes a detailed project schedule, including all tasks proposed in the scope of work, with project delivery dates and anticipated dates for public involvement activities. The PMP will also discuss the quality control plan that will be in effect during the course of the project, describing the process to ensure project deliverables are independently checked, corrected, and backchecked for accuracy and completeness.

Deliverable: Project Management Plan
Task 1.2 Meetings and Coordination
CONSULTANT will organize, attend, and facilitate meetings as necessary to provide progress updates, coordinate between technical disciplines, and facilitate overall project communication. For each meeting, CONSULTANT will provide meeting notices, prepare meeting materials and agenda, attend and facilitate the meeting and prepare meeting minutes. CONSULTANT will consult with the City’s project manager prior to each meeting to get input regarding the agenda. The following meetings are anticipated for Milestone 1:
• Kickoff Meeting: At the start of the project, CONSULTANT will organize a kickoff meeting with all key personnel on the project. The purpose of this meeting will be to review the goals and objectives of the project, discuss each team member’s roles and responsibilities, identify critical project issues and obtain consensus on task durations, particularly reviews. The kickoff meeting will ensure that everyone on the project team is on the same page regarding project delivery and execution.
• PDT Meetings: The project development team (PDT) meetings will serve as the primary forum for reviewing the status of the project and identifying and resolving project issues. Attendees will include CONSULTANT’s Project Manager, CONSULTANT task leads as needed, City staff and other stakeholders as necessary. Throughout the anticipated duration of the project, CONSULTANT will attend and facilitate up to 24 PDT meetings. Virtual meetings are assumed. • Technical Coordination Meetings: CONSULTANT will coordinate technical issues with the City and others through meetings and correspondence. CONSULTANT will prepare for and facilitate up to 4 technical meetings, as needed.

Deliverables: Meeting Notices, Agendas, Exhibits, and Minutes Task 1.3 Project Administration
CONSULTANT will monitor and control the effort and progress of Milestone 1 as follows:
• Set up project accounting system: CONSULTANT will structure the accounting system in accordance with the City’s invoicing and tracking needs.
• Prepare Subconsultant agreements: CONSULTANT will execute contracts with the proposed subconsultants for the scope of services described herein.
• Monitor Subconsultant progress and review/approve invoices: CONSULTANT will track the work progress of the proposed subconsultants and review their invoices for format and content compliance. • Prepare Progress Reports: CONSULTANT will prepare progress reports to detail the project’s activities and will include them as supporting documentation for invoices presented monthly to the City.

Task 1.4 Project Schedule
CONSULTANT will, within two weeks of Notice to Proceed, provide a detailed Milestone 1 Project Baseline Schedule to the City for review and comment. The schedule will be prepared using Microsoft Project and will show contracted tasks/milestones with dependencies and durations, critical path tasks and responsibility assignments. After establishing the baseline schedule, CONSULTANT will update the schedule monthly to coincide with the PDT meetings.

Deliverable: Project Schedule
TASK 2.0 LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
Task 2.1 Data Collection & Review
CONSULTANT will meet with the City to request and obtain any data related to the project site, including new monumentation, as-builts from recent projects, and recent studies. CONSULTANT will review this data and assess its applicability to the project. 588
CONSULTANT will conduct a site reconnaissance to identify and document any new/changed physical features, characteristics, adjacent uses, potential design constraints, and new environmental considerations. Field information will be recorded using field notes and digital photos.

Deliverable: Field notes/photo log
Task 2.2 Survey
Task 2.2.1 Survey Control
CONSULTANT will work closely with City to identify the approved project control. It is assumed that the project control will be based on the City of West Sacramento GPS Control Network, California State Plane Coordinates NAD83 and NGVD29 vertical datums as recorded in Record of Survey 13 MS 61, unless otherwise specified. Control research will be conducted to tie the survey and mapping services for this project into the desired control. Field surveys, GPS measurements and level loops will be conducted to process and adjust main control points to be used for the project. A project control report will be prepared which will include the primary horizontal and vertical control. Control report will include northings, eastings, elevations, basis of bearing, datum and utilized benchmarks.

Deliverable: Control Report
Task 2.2.2 Aerial Photogrammetric Topographic Mapping
CONSULTANT will facilitate the delivery of an overall photogrammetric aerial map and orthophotography of the project area.

CONSULTANT will set all necessary aerial control panels at locations and frequency adequate to meet National Mapping Accuracy Standards of 1” = 40’ scale mapping with 1’ contour intervals based on the approved mapping limits. The limits will cover the proposed alignments of both Phase IV and Phase V. Phase IV will begin at the northerly end of Phase I at the Sycamore Trail and Rice Avenue and continue along a portion of Rice Avenue to a point that turns northerly and over the UPRR corridor to a point of termination at Yolo Street. Phase V will begin at the southerly point of Phase III of the trail and continue southerly across Stone Boulevard, continuing southerly over the Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel and Barge Canal to its termination point along Arlington Road at a width sufficient for design alternatives. Aerial based topographic mapping will show all visible surface features, improvements, 1’ contours, DTM ground surface and spot elevations within the mapping limits. Color photo background imagery will be provided. The imagery will be adjusted using ortho-correction within the mapping limits, and simple rectification within the ground control limits.

Deliverable: Aerial Based Photogrammetric Topo Base File in AutoCAD Civil 3D, DTM File, 3D Surface File, Ortho Image Task 2.2.3 Boundary Resolution
CONSULTANT will research current Right of Way Maps, Parcel Maps, Records of Surveys, Subdivision Maps, Corner Records and deed documents to along each project alignment. A right-of-way base map will be prepared to assist with searching for monuments and right-of-way boundaries. (City to provide preliminary title reports). GPS and conventional surveys will be performed to locate right of way monuments, pins and other boundary markers necessary to resolve and map the right of way.

A right of way base map in AutoCAD will be prepared as the basis of the right of way limits. Railroad properties may require additional research pending available information. CONSULTANT will request railroad documents from the City if public records cannot fully determine the railroad boundaries and right of way.

Deliverable: Right of Way Base Map, Recorded Maps, Deeds Task 2.3 Geotechnical Assessment
CONSULTANT will review available technical reports/documentation and perform a site visit; obtain an encroachment permit and up to five (5) soil boring permits from West Sacramento and Yolo County, respectively; notify subscribing utility companies via Underground Service Alert (USA); perform up to five (5) CPT soundings up to 100-foot depth; and backfill the CPT soundings with neat cement grout.

CONSULTANT will evaluate the field data and prepare a Phase IV and V Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report (SPGR) with our findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding project feasibility. The report will include a project description, scope of work, site plan, site geology and subsurface conditions, logs of CPT soundings, depth to groundwater, interpreted subsurface profile, preliminary seismic study, preliminary geologic hazard evaluation, preliminary recommendations for embankment foundations and earthwork, preliminary structure foundation recommendations, log of test borings drawing, and logs of previous explorations by Taber consultants for the Industrial Blvd bridge.

Deliverable: Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Reports (Draft and Final) 589
Task 2.4 Utility/Drainage Investigation
CONSULTANT will conduct a search to identify utilities that service the project area. This information will be compiled from the previous trail segments combined with information from the Underground Service Alert. The search will be supplemented with a review of available as-builts for the project area provided by the City as well as a field verification. The identified utility companies will be sent a letter requesting information regarding existing and proposed utilities. CONSULTANT will plot the location of all existing facilities on a utility base plan and will prepare a database of utility records indicating the type of utility, owner, drawing number, and other vital information.

As part of this task, CONSULTANT will also identify the main drainage courses that convey water toward the trail as well as the existing infrastructure that is in place to capture and manage the runoff.

The utility and drainage information will be documented on an exhibit and considered as part of the Existing Conditions Memorandum. Ultimately, this data will be used to make decisions about the conceptual trail alignment and will contribute to the development of the cost estimate.

Deliverables: Utility/Drainage Exhibit, Utility Database and Letters Task 2.5 Property Ownership Investigation
Using information obtained from the property records, the City’s GIS databases, and ParcelQuest, CONSULTANT will determine the property ownership of all parcels that the proposed trail alternatives will cross. This data, together with the property boundaries provided by the survey team, will be summarized in an exhibit for the Existing Conditions Memorandum.

Deliverables: Property Ownership Exhibit
Task 2.6 Hydraulic Assessment - Deep Water Channel
CONSULTANT will research existing information and gather hydrologic and hydraulic data for the Sacramento River Deep Water Channel and Barge Canal (SRDWC/BC) from available sources, including the City, Caltrans, Central Valley Flood Protection Board, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and Army Corps of Engineers. Using this data, together with the criteria from the jurisdictional agencies, CONSULTANT will identify the opportunities/challenges and assess the feasibility of up to two alternative crossings of the SRDWC/BC. This assessment will include an approximation of the bridge soffit elevation, potential depth of scour, historic aggradation/degradation, approximate revetment costs (if applicable), and required approvals/permits needed in subsequent phases of the project. This information will be summarized in a Draft Hydraulic Assessment Memorandum that will be submitted to the City for review. CONSULTANT will address comments and finalize the memorandum.

Deliverables: Hydraulic Assessment (Draft and Final)
Task 2.7 Initial Site Assessment
An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) will be performed to determine the potential presence of environmental concerns and contaminated properties at the site that may impact construction of the proposed trail improvements. Potential environmental concerns and contaminated properties that are determined to potentially pose a significant impact to the planned improvements would be further evaluated during a subsequent environmental site investigation.

The primary purpose of the ISA is to assess the site for the potential presence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) (i.e., levels of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products warranting regulatory cleanup action) and the uses and conditions at properties and facilities in the site vicinities with the potential to cause (or have caused) an REC at the site. For the purposes of this ISA, the “vicinity” of the site is defined as properties/facilities within 1/8 mile of the site. The ISA will be performed in general accordance with the ASTM International (ASTM) Designation E 1527-21 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process.

The scope of services for the ISA is presented as follows. • Perform a reconnaissance of the site to assess the presence of, or make visual observations of indicators of the potential presence of, RECs on the site. These indicators may include 55-gallon drums, underground and aboveground storage tanks, chemical containers, waste storage and disposal areas, industrial facilities, discolored surficial soils, electrical transformers that may contain polychlorinated biphenyls, and areas conspicuously absent of vegetation. If access is unavailable to any portions of the site, our ability to complete the assessment described herein may be hindered. Assessment of the site for wetlands, asbestos-containing building materials, lead-containing paint, lead in drinking water, radon, methane gas, and naturally occurring substances such as arsenic and asbestos are not included in the ISA services.
• Perform a visual survey of adjoining and adjacent properties from the site and from public thoroughfares to observe general types of land use and conditions surrounding the site. 590
• Review the Standard Environmental Records Sources: Federal and State as referenced in ASTM Designation E 1527-21 to obtain information regarding the potential presence of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products on the site or on properties within the approximate minimum search distance specified for each source, reviewing reasonably ascertainable regulatory agency files for the site and documented hazardous substance and/or petroleum product release locations near the site. The sources for these files could include the local department of environmental health, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control. • Review pertinent and reasonably ascertainable information sources to evaluate physiographic, geologic, and hydrogeologic conditions in the vicinity of the site.
• Review and interpret reasonably ascertainable historical aerial photographs to obtain information concerning the historical use of the site and adjacent properties.
• Review historical United States Geological Survey topographic maps to obtain information relative to the topography of the site, as well as previous development and uses of the site and properties located in the vicinity of the site. • Review documents provided by the Client. Potentially useful documents may include geotechnical, geologic, and environmental reports, site plans, plot plans, and correspondence with regulatory agencies. • Prepare a report summarizing the findings of the ISA for the site and qualitatively describing existing, or the potential for, RECs on the site.

Deliverables: Initial Site Assessment (Draft and Final) Task 2.8 Existing Conditions Memorandum
Using the data collected from site visits, surveys/mapping, property boundaries/owner identification, utility and drainage investigations, geotechnical and hydraulic assessments, as well as reviews of existing plans, policies, and nearby projects, CONSULTANT will summarize the relevant technical conditions along the Phase IV and V alignments to establish a baseline to which future conditions can be compared. Supporting investigations/assessments will be included as appendices. CONSULTANT will prepare and submit a Draft Existing Conditions Memorandum to the City for review. Comments will be resolved and addressed, and a final memorandum will be prepared.

Deliverables: Existing Conditions Memorandum (Draft and Final) TASK 3.0 CAREHOLDER COORDINATION + CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
Task 3.1 Public Engagement Plan (PEP)
CONSULTANT will prepare and develop a comprehensive Public Engagement Plan consistent with the RFP’s Outreach and Engagement Strategy Plan requirement. The PEP will identify key stakeholders, engagement methods, schedules, and feedback goals for both Phase IV and Phase V. Based on the project background and goals provided by the City, CONSULTANT will develop a draft PEP and submit to the City for review. Comments on the PEP will be addressed, and the document will be revised and finalized. CONSULTANT will also establish and manage a community and partner contact database as part of this task.

Deliverables: Public Engagement Plan (Draft and Final)
Task 3.2 Website and Outreach Materials
Using the technical content, graphics, and planning/engineering information supplied by the technical team, CONSULTANT will develop promotional and engagement materials to support awareness-building and informed participation. These materials will be distributed through mailers, door hangers, digital platforms, and pop-ups. CONSULTANT will also coordinate interpretation and translation services and create/maintain the project webpage on the City website, consistent with RFP Task 3 expectations.

Deliverables: Outreach Materials, Project Webpage
Task 3.3 Community Workshops
Three community workshops will be held, one in each of the engagement phases described in the Project Approach, to support early listening, concept feedback, and validation of preferred alternatives. For each workshop, CONSULTANT will lead awareness campaigns, lead/facilitate the workshops, coordinate venues/logistics/materials/setup/tear-down, document feedback and outcomes.

Deliverables: Workshop Summaries (3)
Task 3.4 Pop-Up Outreach Events
Six pop-up events will be used to reach residents who may not attend formal meetings, consistent with the RFP’s emphasis on inclusive engagement. For this task, CONSULTANT will lead and facilitate pop-up outreach, prepare materials and engagement activities, and document community input.

Deliverables: Pop-Up Summaries (6)
591
Task 3.5 One-on-One or Small Group Meetings
To forge consensus and facilitate communication, coordination with other agencies, businesses, utilities, property owners, rail/port representatives, and emergency services will be needed. CONSULTANT will work with each of these stakeholders to ensure that the proposed improvements are properly coordinated. This task includes conducting meetings and/or field walks, preparing exhibits, and sharing project information with the stakeholder’s technical staff.

Deliverables: Meeting Minutes
Task 3.6 Community Surveys
Surveys will be used as a core engagement tool to reach a broad and diverse audience, including residents who may not participate in in-person activities. Surveys will support early listening, concept evaluation, and validation of preferred alternatives, consistent with the RFP’s emphasis on inclusive and equitable outreach. CONSULTANT will design and administer up to two multilingual surveys (online and paper), coordinate translation services, manage survey distribution through digital platforms, mailers, workshops, pop-ups, and community partners, and analyze results/summarize key findings to inform alternative development and decision-making.

Deliverables: Surveys (2)
Task 3.7 Outreach and Engagement Memorandum
CONSULTANT will prepare an Outreach and Engagement Memorandum summarizing activities, participation, and key themes. A draft memorandum will be submitted to the City for review. Comments will be addressed and a final document will be prepared.

Deliverables: Outreach and Engagement Memorandum (Draft and Final) TASK 4.0 DESIGN ALTERNATIVES CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTABILITY AND ANALYSIS Task 4.1 Alternatives Development
Based upon the results of the project mapping, geotechnical and hydraulic study, available data, and input from the City/stakeholders, CONSULTANT will assess the topographic, environmental, hydraulic, fiscal, and right of way constraints, as well as stakeholder feedback, and will prepare three alignment alternatives each for Phase IV and V. Exhibits and renderings will be prepared for each alternative to illustrate the alignments in plan, profile and typical section view and will incorporate a combination of engineering and landscape architecture graphics. The layout/plan view will be displayed on an aerial photo to present the alternatives to project stakeholders and for inclusion in the feasibility study.

Deliverables: Alternative Exhibits/Renderings
Task 4.2 Railroad Coordination (UPRR/SERA)
CONSULTANT will submit an inquiry to UPRR’s Public Project Contact Center to notify the UP Public Projects team of the project and obtain a point of contact for the project. CONSULTANT will facilitate the execution of the standard formal Reimbursement Agreement (RA) between the City and UPRR as a prerequisite to formal coordination between the design team and UPRR. After execution of the RA, CONSULTANT will set up and facilitate the Field Diagnostic Meeting, including contacting meeting attendees, setting a meeting date, preparing concept plans/inventory sheets, facilitating the on-site meeting, and taking detailed notes.

Subsequent to the field meeting, CONSULTANT will schedule a wrap-up meeting and prepare/circulate/finalize the meeting minutes.

Deliverables: Meeting Materials/Minutes
Task 4.3 Constructability Assessment
CONSULTANT will conduct a constructability review of the project alternatives to identify the opportunities and challenges associated with each. The results of this review will be summarized in a draft Preliminary Constructability Memo and submitted to the City for review. CONSULTANT will address comments provided by the City and produce the Final Preliminary Constructability Memo to support the Feasibility Study.

Deliverables: Preliminary Constructability Memorandum (Draft and Final) Task 4.4 Advance Planning Studies
For each of the alternative structures considered in the feasibility study, CONSULTANT will prepare an Advance Planning Study (APS) drawing that will show the elevation, plan view and typical section of each alternative. The drawings will not only show the type, span configuration and dimensions of each alternative, but will also include key site constraints, hydraulic clearances, US Coast Guard clearances and requirements, levee impacts and foundation types.

Deliverables: Advance Planning Studies (6) 592
TASK 5.0 ENGINEER’S OPINION OF PRELIMINARY COSTS ESTIMATES FOR DESIGN

ALTERNATIVES
Task 5.1 Cost Estimates
CONSULTANT will prepare a feasibility level cost estimate for each project alternative (three each for Phases IV and V) using the standard 11-page estimate format. The unit costs for construction items will be based on current bids. Costs will include all roadway and structural items, environmental mitigation, and right-of-way acquisition.

Deliverables: Planning Level Cost Estimates (6)
Task 5.2 Right-of-Way Cost Estimate
Costs for right-of-way acquisition associated with each Phase will include current market data, zoning, and land use.

CONSULTANT will review recent sales data and provide an estimate of total acquisition costs based upon proposed impacted areas. It is assumed that cost estimates will be prepared for up to three (3) parcels and three (3) alternatives for each Phase. This information will be summarized in a table and will include a total cost for all potential acquisitions.

Deliverables: Right of Way Cost Summary Table
TASK 6.0 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Task 6.1 Design Alternatives Memo
Each of the stand-alone design alternative concepts for Phase IV and V of the Sycamore Trail will be summarized in a Design Alternatives Memo. For each alternative, the memo will include a description of each of the following: general description, layout/location, structure types, trail connections, architectural features, environmental/resource impacts, constructability issues, coordination requirements, engineering considerations, and cost opinions. The text will be supplemented with the exhibits prepared in Task 4.1. A draft of the memorandum will be submitted to the City for review. Comments will be addressed and the memorandum will be finalized
Deliverables: Design Alternatives Memorandum (Draft and Final) Task 6.2 Preferred Alternatives Analysis
CONSULTANT will identify goals and priorities in collaboration with the City to establish the evaluation criteria and framework that will guide the alternatives analysis. CONSULTANT will evaluate each of the alternatives in accordance with the evaluation framework to compare the alternative concepts and identify a preferred alternative. The evaluation process will be summarized in a draft memo and submitted to the City for review. Comments will be addressed and the memorandum will be finalized.

Deliverables: Preferred Alternatives Analysis Memorandum (Draft and Final) TASK 7.0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
Task 7.1 Preliminary Environmental Study Form
CONSULTANT will prepare the Preliminary Study Form for NEPA clearance of the overall Phase IV and V projects. The PES serves as a scoping document for Caltrans NEPA technical studies and environmental document. The PES Form will identify the recommended federal environmental documentation, technical studies, surveys, approvals, agency coordination, and permits required for both projects. A draft Area of Potential Effects (APE) boundary will be included in the exhibits.

Deliverable: PES Form
Task 7.2 Preliminary Engineering Right-of-Way Checklist CONSULTANT’s Right of Way team will prepare the required 13-E Preliminary Engineering Right-of-Way Checklist for the project.

This checklist is submitted with the PES form and formally notifies Caltrans that the project includes right of way components.

Early submittal helps ensure alignment with Caltrans requirements and avoids unexpected issues during the right-of-way phase.

In addition, the checklist confirms that the City has qualified right-of-way professionals in place to prepare the necessary documentation and administer the right of way process.

Deliverables: 13-E Preliminary Engineering Right-of-Way Checklist 593
Task 7.3 Field Review (OPTIONAL)
As part of the PES form review process, Caltrans may require an in-person field review to assist with determining the appropriate level of environmental analysis required in support of the NEPA document. This scope includes one field visit with CONSULTANT’s environmental and engineering staff.

TASK 8.0 NEXT STEPS: PROJECT COORDINATION, FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES, PERMITTING

REQUIREMENTS
Task 8.1 Implementation Plan
CONSULTANT will develop an Implementation Plan for Phases IV and V of the Sycamore Trail. For each phase, CONSULTANT will identify necessary project coordination, roles and responsibilities for implementation, potential funding opportunities, required environmental documentation, and required permits. Key challenges and risk factors will be summarized, and a phasing recommendation will be provided based on existing conditions, right-of-way acquisition, feasibility, cost/funding, safety, and support. A draft of the plan will be submitted to the City for review. Comments will be addressed and the plan will be finalized Deliverables: Implementation Plan (Draft and Final)
Task 8.2 Fact Sheets
CONSULTANT will develop a fact sheet for each preferred alternative (one each for Phase IV and V) to include overall project information (descriptive and graphical), key features/facts, approximate cost, timeline, and milestones. A draft fact sheet will be developed and submitted to the City for review, comment, and refinement prior to distribution to the public.

Deliverables: Fact Sheets (2)
Task 8.3 Funding Strategy
CONSULTANT will develop specific strategies for pursuing discretionary funding programs and engaging stakeholders involved in the funding process, taking into consideration the project’s benefits, location, phasing options, schedule, cost, and local funding commitments, as well as the selection criteria and past awards of specific funding programs. These strategies will be summarized in the Implementation Plan (Task 8.1).

Task 8.4 Alternative Refinement
As additional information is developed and the implementation plan is considered, further refinement of the preferred alternative concepts’ designs and the estimated costs may be needed to better identify next steps. CONSULTANT will make refinements as needed to provide clarity and direction for the Implementation Plan.

Task 8.5 Grant Application Support (OPTIONAL)
As an optional task, CONSULTANT will support the City’s preparation of a grant funding application, including:
• Obtaining data and statistics
• Preparing graphics and exhibits
• Obtaining Letters of Support
• Drafting text narratives and answers to application questions This scope includes support for one grant application for funds such as CMAQ or ATP.

Deliverable: Data/Narrative/Exhibits
TASK 9.0 DRAFT + FINAL FEASIBILITY REPORT
Task 9.1 Draft Feasibility Report
CONSULTANT will prepare a Draft Feasibility Report summarizing the following Phase IV and V feasibility study efforts:
• Project background/description/purpose • Utility Conflicts • Existing Conditions • Maintenance Considerations
• Proposed Improvements • Roadway Alternatives
• Stakeholder Identification & Outreach • Structure Alternatives • Hydraulic Assessment • Cost Estimate
• Preliminary Environmental Assessment • Funding
• Geotechnical Considerations • Project Schedule
• Right-of-Way Needs • Conclusions/Recommendations
594
The plan will include the conceptual exhibits of the proposed alternatives. All supporting memorandums contributing to the report will be attached as appendices. CONSULTANT will submit the Draft Report to the City and identified stakeholders for review.

Deliverables: Draft Feasibility Report
Task 9.2 Presentations
CONSULTANT will prepare a PowerPoint presentation summarizing the content of the Draft Feasibility Report and its conclusions. Using this PowerPoint, CONSULTANT will support and participate in presentations to the public, City Planning Commission, and City Council and will collect feedback gathered at each presentation. At the conclusion of the project, CONSULTANT will provide support in presenting the Final Feasibility Report to the City Council.

Deliverables: PowerPoint Presentation
Task 9.3 Final Feasibility Report
After the Draft Report is circulated for review, CONSULTANT will collect comments and feedback from each reviewing entity.

CONSULTANT will prepare a comment response matrix and will hold a comment resolution meeting with the City to discuss the approach to addressing various comments. The final resolutions will be recorded in the matrix, and the comment summary will be provided to the City. Once agreement is reached regarding comment resolution, CONSULTANT will update the Feasibility Report and produce the draft Final version for City review. CONSULTANT will address one round of comments and submit the Final Report to attach to the City.

Deliverables: Final Feasibility Report
595
Scope of Work
MILESTONE 2: PROJECT APPROVAL/ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION (OPTIONAL) TASK 1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Task 1.1 Project Management Plan/Quality Control
CONSULTANT shall prepare a Project Management Plan for Milestone 2 that includes a detailed project schedule, including all tasks proposed in the scope of work, with project delivery dates and anticipated dates for public involvement activities. The PMP will also discuss the quality control plan that will be in effect during the project, describing the process to ensure project deliverables are independently checked, corrected, and backchecked for accuracy and completeness.

Deliverable: Project Management Plan
Task 1.2 Meetings and Coordination
CONSULTANT will organize, attend, and facilitate meetings as necessary to provide progress updates, coordinate between technical disciplines, and facilitate overall project communication. For each meeting, CONSULTANT will provide meeting notices, prepare meeting materials and agenda, attend and facilitate the meeting and prepare meeting minutes. CONSULTANT will consult with the City’s project manager prior to each meeting to get input regarding the agenda. The following meetings are anticipated for Milestone 2:
• Kickoff Meeting: At the start of the project, CONSULTANT will organize a kickoff meeting with all key personnel on the project. The purpose of this meeting will be to review the goals and objectives of the project, discuss each team member’s roles and responsibilities, identify critical project issues and obtain consensus on task durations, particularly reviews. The kickoff meeting will ensure that everyone on the project team is on the same page regarding project delivery and execution.
• PDT Meetings: The project development team (PDT) meetings will serve as the primary forum for reviewing the status of the project and identifying and resolving project issues. Attendees will include CONSULTANT’s Project Manager, CONSULTANT task leads as needed, City staff and other stakeholders as necessary. Throughout the anticipated duration of the project, CONSULTANT will attend and facilitate up to 24 PDT meetings. Virtual meetings are assumed. • Technical Coordination Meetings: CONSULTANT will coordinate technical issues with the City and others through meetings and correspondence. CONSULTANT will prepare for and facilitate up to 4 technical meetings, as needed.

Deliverables: Meeting Notices, Agendas, Exhibits, and Minutes Task 1.3 Project Administration
CONSULTANT will monitor and control the effort and progress of Milestone 2 as follows:
• Set up project accounting system: CONSULTANT will structure the accounting system in accordance with the City’s invoicing and tracking needs.
• Prepare Subconsultant agreements: CONSULTANT will execute contracts with the proposed subconsultants for the scope of services described herein.
• Monitor Subconsultant progress and review/approve invoices: CONSULTANT will track the work progress of the proposed subconsultants and review their invoices for format and content compliance. • Prepare Progress Reports: CONSULTANT will prepare progress reports to detail the project’s activities and will include them as supporting documentation for invoices presented monthly to the City.

Task 1.4 Project Schedule
CONSULTANT will, within two weeks of Notice to Proceed, provide a detailed Milestone 2 Project Baseline Schedule to the City for review and comment. The schedule will be prepared using Microsoft Project and will show contracted tasks/milestones with dependencies and durations, critical path tasks and responsibility assignments. After establishing the baseline schedule, CONSULTANT will update the schedule monthly to coincide with the PDT meetings.

Deliverable: Project Schedule
TASK 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION & PERMITTING (OPTIONAL) Because the City intends to pursue federal funding for Phases IV and V, compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) will be required. CONSULTANT has determined that the Projects can avoid all individual and cumulative significant environmental effects; therefore, a Categorical Exclusion (CE) pursuant to 23 CFR 771.117 is the appropriate level of NEPA documentation, with Caltrans serving as the NEPA lead. To maximize efficiency, CONSULTANT recommends clearing both phases 596 under a single environmental document. To support transparency and public involvement, CONSULTANT recommends formal public participation under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An Initial Study with a proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of CEQA documentation, with the City serving as CEQA lead.

Task 2.1 CEQA (Phase IV & V)
Task 2.1.1 Draft CEQA IS/MND
CONSULTANT will incorporate the purpose and need, project description, and the content from the existing technical studies into the Draft IS/MND. The Draft IS/MND will be prepared consistent with the City’s environmental documents and CEQA guidelines.

The document will determine if the project has any significant impacts on the environment, identify potential mitigation measures for such impacts, and identify mitigation measures that would reduce impacts below the threshold of significance.

CONSULTANT will coordinate with the City to review and update the document prior to the start of public review during circulation.

Deliverable: Draft and Final Initial Study with Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Task 2.1.2 Notice of Availability and Public Circulation Once the IS/MND has been approved by the City, it will be circulated for public review for a period of 30 days. CONSULTANT will coordinate the preparation of the distribution list with the City.

Pursuant to CEQA requirements, CONSULTANT will prepare a Notice of Availability for the Draft IS/MND. This notice, along with the draft environmental document, will be made available at the City offices and the Public Library during a 30-day public circulation and review period. The document will be distributed to other reviewing government agencies through the California State Clearinghouse.

During the 30-day public review period, a public informational meeting may be necessary to solicit comments about the project.

CONSULTANT will attend this meeting to answer any questions regarding the project, any potential environmental impacts, as well as the environmental schedule. All comments at this meeting will be included and addressed within the final environmental document.

Deliverable: Draft/Final Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent, Notice of Determination, Public Mailers, Public Meeting Materials/Exhibits Task 2.1.3 Responses to Comments and Final IS/MND
IS/MND that were received, and to discuss potential responses to these comments. CONSULTANT will then formulate responses to the comments on the IS/MND. Once draft responses to comments are completed, they will be submitted to the City’s staff for review and comment. The City’s revisions will be incorporated into the response to comments document. Following public review of the draft IS/MND, CONSULTANT will incorporate public comments and final mitigation measures into the final IS/MND document.

In addition, CONSULTANT will make the standard updates that convert the “proposed MND” to a final MND. To complete the CEQA process, CONSULTANT will file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the City Recorder’s Office within five days of approval of the IS/MND (pursuant to CEQA guidelines). This scope assumes that all filing fees will be paid by the City.

Deliverable: Draft and Final Response to Public Comments, Final IS/MND, and Notice of Determination Task 2.2 NEPA (Phase IV & V)
Task 2.2.1 Natural Environment Study and Wetland Delineation CONSULTANT will prepare a Natural Environment Study in accordance with the Caltrans approval format. This study will include a description of the field methods used and the results of the biological assessment of the project area. The report will list plant and animal species present, along with a general description of the plant communities occurring within the project area.

CONSULTANT will prepare and include in the study a graphic displaying the location of the sensitive plant communities on site and any sensitive biological resources observed. The report also will contain tables describing sensitive species and their habitats that are present or potentially present; it also will identify and assess project impacts on the existing biological resources, including any sensitive species. Mitigation measures will be included as necessary.

As part of the Natural Environment Study and in support of regulatory permits, CONSULTANT will also include a Wetland Delineation as an attachment. The Wetland Delineation will include field identification of wetlands or other sensitive areas that may be in proximity to the Project work areas. The Wetlands Delineation report will include a formal jurisdictional delineation of wetlands and waters of the US conducted in accordance with United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) manuals and procedures.

Deliverable: Draft and Final Natural Environment Study with Wetland Delineation 597 Task 2.2.2 Historic Property Survey Report/Archaeological Survey Report CONSULTANT will prepare documentation in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This work will include efforts to record archaeological and historical resources identified within the study area. A Historic Property Survey Report will be prepared to identify and evaluate any cultural resources and evaluate the potential for impacts on those resources. If any historic resources (structures) are identified, they will be evaluated to determine if they meet any qualified criteria for eligibility on the National Register of Historic Places.

As an attachment to the Historic Property Survey Report, an Archaeological Survey Report will be prepared to evaluate if any archaeological resources are likely to be found. A pedestrian survey of the Area of Potential Effects will take place prior to preparing this report. As part of this effort, CONSULTANT will perform Native American Consultation consistent with Section 106 and Assembly Bill 52 requirements. Our cultural resources specialists are experts in the requirements of both Section 106 and AB52 and will provide the City a complete service to ensure Native American Consultation does not result in any project delays.

Deliverable: Historic Property Survey Report/Archaeological Survey Report and APE Map Task 2.2.3 Extended Phase I Testing (Phase V)
Based on previous experience in the West Sacramento region, the Project area along the Sacramento River Deep Water Shipping Channel is considered highly sensitive for buried Native American resources which are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. CONSULTANT’s qualified Archaeologists will perform ground testing to determine presence or absence of the site within the Project construction limits. This scope of work assumes that the site will not be found within ground disturbing limits.

Should the site occur within construction limits, an Extended Phase II to determine specific site boundaries will be required under a separate scope.

Deliverable: Extended Phase I Testing Summary Report
Task 2.2.4 Historic Resources Evaluation Report/Finding of Effect The proposed scope of work for the Historic Resources Evaluation Report (HRER) includes the following tasks:
• Section 106 Consultation – CONSULTANT will conduct outreach to potentially interested members of the public in accordance with established Section 106 procedures.
• Records Review/Research – CONSULTANT will review all existing information on the project area provided by the client and consultant team. Property-specific and general research will be conducted to develop relevant historic contexts for the potential historic properties. Research may include general historical information, building permits, county tax assessor records, historic aerial photos, historic maps, Sanborn maps, etc. • Site Visit/Repository Research – CONSULTANT will conduct a site visit to identify any known or potential historic properties in the APE. Potential historic properties are those with buildings or structures over 45 years of age. Known historic properties are those that are listed or have been determined eligible for listing under the local, state, or federal landmark and historic district programs. Digital photographs will be taken during the field survey. All photographs will be taken from the public right-of-way, unless property access is granted in advance. • Evaluations/DPR 523 Inventory Forms – CONSULTANT will prepare the relevant historic contexts and evaluate all properties greater than 45 years of age within the project APE that are not otherwise exempt from evaluation. The results of the evaluations will be recorded on DPR 523 inventory forms and included in the HRER. For the purposes of this scope and cost, we assume that no more than three (3) individual properties will be evaluated. It is assumed that any large multi-component resources, such as historic districts or linear resources, would either be assumed eligible or only the individual components within the APE would be evaluated. • Draft Historical Resource Evaluation Report – CONSULTANT will prepare the draft HRER according to established Caltrans procedures as laid out in the Standard Environmental Reference (SER) and Section 106 PA and submit it to City for review.
• Final Historical Resource Evaluation Report – CONSULTANT will revise the draft HRER based on comments. We assume three rounds of minor comments: one from Dokken, one from the City, and one from Caltrans.

The proposed scope of work for CONSULTANT to prepare the Finding of Effect (FOE) Report includes the following tasks:
• Review Plans/Project Details – CONSULTANT will review the available project plans and details for the purpose of determining the effects of the project on the historic properties in the APE. • Draft Finding of Effect – CONSULTANT will prepare an FOE according to established Caltrans procedures as laid out in the Standard Environmental Reference (SER) and Section 106 PA and submit to the City for review. This scope assumes no more than three (3) historic properties in the APE and a finding of no adverse effect without conditions. • Final Finding of Effect – CONSULTANT will revise the draft FOE based on comments. We assume three (3) rounds of minor comments: one (1) from Dokken, one (1) from the City, and one (1) from Caltrans.

Deliverable: HRER/FOE (Draft and Final) 598
Task 2.2.5 Noise Technical Memorandum
The project is not considered a Type I project under Caltrans Noise Analysis Protocol because the trail improvements would not result in the construction or alteration of an existing roadway. A Noise Technical Memorandum will be prepared to document temporary construction impacts, local noise ordinances, and suitable measures to minimize construction noise.

Deliverable: Draft and Final Noise Technical Memorandum Task 2.2.6 Visual Impact Assessment Advanced
The construction of a new pedestrian bridge over the Sacramento River Deep Water Shipping Channel will result in impacts to the visual environment. The new alignment of the trail will also require substantial vegetation removal, particularly adjacent to the channel which will also affect the visual environment. To assess how these changes could impact viewer groups in the project vicinity, CONSULTANT will prepare a Visual Impact Assessment – Advanced report. This technical study will include an inventory, including photograph documentation, of the following existing conditions: viewpoints; notable visual resources; the vividness, intactness, and unity of the project area; and the site’s landscape units. Photographs will be taken to be used in the analysis and for graphics. This data will be used in conjunction with comments solicited from sensitive viewer groups and users of the bridge and incorporated into recommendations to minimize any visual impacts assessed in the report. This scope and fee include up to four (4) renderings of the new bridge and alignment by CONSULTANT’s sub consultant, Callendar and Associates, as well as review of the document by their licensed Landscape Architect.

Deliverable: Draft and Final Visual Impact Assessment
Task 2.2.7 Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment (ISA) Utilizing the Initial Site Assessment (ISA) that was prepared during Milestone 1: Feasibility Study, CONSULTANT will update that report by performing the following tasks:
• Perform a brief reconnaissance of the site to confirm changes to potential presence of RECs on the site. Similar to the initial report, assessment of the site for wetlands, asbestos-containing building materials, lead-containing paint, lead in drinking water, radon, methane gas, and naturally occurring substances such as arsenic and asbestos are not included in the ISA services.
• Perform a visual survey of adjoining and adjacent properties from the site and from public thoroughfares to confirm that the general types of land use and conditions surrounding the site remain unchanged. • Review the Standard Environmental Records Sources: Federal and State as referenced in ASTM Designation E 1527-21 to confirm information regarding the potential presence of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products on the site or on properties within the approximate minimum search distance specified for each source remains unchanged.

CONSULTANT will update the ISA and submit a draft to the City and Caltrans for review. Upon receipt of comments, CONSULTANT will update the report and submit a final version in support of the NEPA document for the project.

Deliverables: Initial Site Assessment (Draft and Final) Task 2.2.8 Hazardous Waste Phase II Testing
The following tasks support the completion of the Hazardous Waste Phase II testing:
• We assume encroachment permits and access agreements have been obtained by others. • Advance up to 18 soil borings within the proposed trail alignment to a depth of up to 3 feet using hand auger sampling equipment.
• Collect soil samples at depth intervals of 0 to 1 and 1 to 3 feet from each boring. We will collect soil samples from the hand auger and transfer them to Ziploc® re-sealable plastic bags or stainless-steel tubes. We will subsequently label the samples, place them in an ice chest, and deliver them to the analytical laboratory under standard chain-of-custody documentation. We will backfill the borings with the excavated soil materials. We will note general soil types encountered in the borings on the daily field log.
• Perform quality assurance/quality control procedures during the field exploration activities. These procedures will include decontamination of sampling equipment before each sample is collected, and providing chain-of-custody documentation for each soil sample submitted to the laboratory. We will decontaminate the soil sampling equipment between each sample by washing the equipment with an Alconox® solution followed by a double rinse with deionized water. We will discharge the rinseate water to ground surface areas within the right-of-way which do not slope to drainage inlets or surface water bodies.
599
• Analyze the soil samples for CAM 17 heavy metals following USEPA Test Methods 6010B and 7471A, diesel-range and motor oil-range organics following USEPA Test Method 8015M, polychlorinated biphenyls following USEPA Test Method 8082, and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons following USEPA Test Method 8270 (up to 20 samples). Select samples may be analyzed for soluble metals based on the results of the total metals analysis (assume up to twelve samples). • Prepare a report to present our findings and conclusions. The report will include the following:
o Introduction/project description
o Vicinity Map and Site Plan showing boring locations
o Investigative methods
o Investigative results and field observations
o Statistical analysis of the data
o Conclusions and recommendations
o Appendices including laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documentation Deliverable: Draft and Final Phase II Testing Report
Task 2.2.9 Community Impact Assessment
Due to anticipated public interest in the project, CONSULTANT will prepare a Community Impact Assessment (CIA) to document potential impacts this project could have to the local community as well as to evaluate the potential for public controversy. This report will evaluate the land use takes, residential/commercial relocations, changes in the visual environment, and any impacts on cultural/biological resources that may be important to the community. The CIA will be based on current Caltrans Guidelines (Environmental Guidelines Volume 1, Chapter 24 – Community Impacts) and will discuss social impacts, businesses and residences affected by the project, and community resources such as schools, parks, and emergency services.

Deliverable: Draft and Final Community Impact Assessment Task 2.2.10 Air Quality Technical Memorandum
This project is exempt from regional and project level conformity since it does not propose any increases in vehicular capacity.

However, construction equipment may generate additional air pollution during construction. Construction-related air quality impacts will be assessed qualitatively based on the requirements included in the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District’s fugitive dust regulation. CONSULTANT will summarize this analysis in an Air Quality Technical Memorandum.

Deliverable: Draft and Final Air Quality Technical Memorandum Task 2.2.11 Water Quality Assessment
CONSULTANT will prepare a Water Quality Assessment Report to address the potential for project impacts on water quality based on current Caltrans guidelines (Environmental Handbook Volume 1, Chapter 9, Water Quality). The report will discuss the water features in the project area, receiving waters conditions, objectives, and beneficial uses as well as Caltrans standard best management practices (BMPs) and project design features required in accordance with the current Caltrans Statewide Storm Water Management Plan.

Deliverable: Draft and Final Water Quality Assessment Report Task 2.2.12 Biological Assessment (USFWS and NMFS)
The Project may have direct and indirect impacts to federally listed species. Consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NNMFS) is anticipated regarding potential modification of Essential Fish Habitat within the Sacramento Deep Water Shipping Canal. Further, the project area contains suitable habitat for the valley elderberry longhorn beetle and northwestern pond turtle; therefore, consultation with USFWS is anticipated. Consistent with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and the Magnuson–Stevens Act, Biological Assessments will be prepared to initiate consultation with NMFS and USFWS. The reports will include attendance at meetings, coordination with the project team, responses to information requests, and research of mitigation options. CONSULTANT will provide full-service support for the City and Caltrans during Section 7 Consultation with NMFS and USFWS. This process is a federal-to-federal agency interaction with Caltrans acting as the Federal Agency on the City’s behalf. CONSULTANT will provide support to Caltrans if any additional information is requested to ensure the Section 7 Consultation process will not result in substantial project delays. Section 7 Consultation will be the critical path to obtaining NEPA approval from Caltrans. This scope assumes Caltrans will request two Biological Assessments, one for NMFS and one for USFWS.

Deliverables: Biological Assessments (2) 600
Task 2.2.13 Location Hydraulic Study
If a new bridge over the Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel (SDWSC) is selected as the preferred Phase V alternative, the piers of the structure will encroach on the base floodplain. As a result, the federal guidelines provided in Executive Order 11988 - Floodplain Management require that a Location Hydraulic Study and Floodplain Evaluation Report Summary be prepared to supplement the environmental document. These studies include a hydraulic analysis that will be performed to evaluate the impact of the proposed improvements on the floodplain during 100-year flood conditions. Using 50- and 100-year frequency flows, CONSULTANT will create a 2D hydraulic model of the existing condition based on topographic information (LiDAR), channel surveys, and detailed survey information (if needed) or as-built plans of the existing bridge provided by others using HEC-RAS version 6.7. Based on the existing condition model, CONSULTANT will then create Post Project models that reflect the proposed channel and structure improvements. The results of each model will be assessed to determine the impact of the improvements on the hydraulic conveyance of the SDWSC as well as the risk to floodplain values and adjacent properties.

CONSULTANT will prepare a Draft Location Hydraulic Study and Floodplain Evaluation Report Summary to discuss the results of the analysis and compare the impacts/risks of each project being considered. This document will be submitted to the City and Caltrans for review and updated/finalized based on comments received.

Deliverable: Location Hydraulic Study and Summary Floodplain Encroachment Report (Draft and Final) Task 2.2.14 Relocation Impact Memorandum
Should the City select an alternative that would result in the full acquisition of a residential property, a Relocation Impact Memorandum will be required by Caltrans in support of NEPA. CONSULTANT will work with Caltrans Local Assistance to prepare a Relocation Impact Study.
. Generally, a Relocation Impact Memorandum is prepared in cases where there are fewer than 10 displacements and ample availability of replacement properties.
• A Relocation Impact Memo will be prepared for this project and will include the following information:
• Project Description that includes project: location map, limits map, alignment map, and summary sheet • Number of displacement units
• Type of nonresidential units displaced and estimated size of operation • Identification of special problems
• Proposed solutions for noted problems
Deliverable: Relocation Impact Memorandum
Task 2.2.15 NEPA Categorical Exclusion
CONSULTANT will work with Caltrans Local Assistance to prepare a Categorical Exclusion as the NEPA approval document for the project and will include avoidance, minimization and mitigation measures provided in the technical studies prepared.

Deliverable: NEPA Categorical Exclusion
Task 2.2.16 Environmental Oversight
The environmental lead, Sarah Holm, will oversee and coordinate the preparation of NEPA and CEQA technical studies, environmental documentation, and required environmental permits. Responsibilities include attending monthly PDTs, managing subconsultants and technical specialists, coordinating with the lead agency and resource agencies, ensuring consistency and regulatory compliance across all technical disciplines, maintaining project schedules and budgets, and providing quality assurance/quality control of environmental deliverables.

Task 2.3 Permits to Enter for Environmental Surveys
CONSULTANT will obtain Permit to Enters from up to three (3) properties to perform environmental and cultural surveys.

CONSULTANT will prepare letters, Permit to Enter documents, and exhibits that identify the survey area and type of activities that will take place on each property. As necessary, CONSULTANT will meet with the property owners to discuss the field investigations to assist in obtaining access.

Deliverables: Permits to Enter
TASK 3.0 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING (OPTIONAL)
Task 3.1 Preliminary/Final Hydraulic Report
CONSULTANT will construct a point precipitation model to determine the 50, 100, and 200-year hydrographs and peak discharges. Peak discharges will be consistent with the FEMA/Central Valley Flood Protection Board discharges for the project.

Using the model created for the LHS, CONSULTANT will model the 50-year, 100-year and 200-year discharges and will update the existing conditions model for up to 3 proposed bridge construction configurations, including any proposed changes to the 601 roadway approach elevations and grading provided by others. As part of this task, CONSULTANT will also review maintenance records and cross sections for historic degradation, estimate pier, contraction, abutment, and pressure flow scour, and assess stability of the existing slopes, determine if bank protection at the bridge is needed, and size RSP for the preferred alternative.

CONSULTANT will document the design storm criteria section in the PHR including guidance from the Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM) which delineates the hydraulic design criteria for bridges. CONSULTANT will complete a draft Preliminary Hydraulic Report (PHR) documenting the hydrology and hydraulic results for the existing conditions and up to 3 proposed bridge alternatives for the Type Selection Report. CONSULTANT will update the Preliminary Hydraulic Report into a Final Hydraulic Report (FHR) documenting hydrology, hydraulic, and scour results for the preferred alternative.

Deliverable: Preliminary & Final Hydraulic Report (Draft and Final) Task 3.2 Refine Conceptual Designs
The concept designs prepared during the feasibility study phase will be refined in coordination with the supplemental topographic mapping to optimize the geometrics and primary features of the project. Stationing and earthwork limits will be added and conform limits refined to support the environmental evaluation.

Task 3.3 Bridge Type Selection
Upon approval by the City of the preferred alternative for Phases IV and V, the CONSULTANT will prepare a Draft General Plan for the preferred alternative of each Phase. The Bridge General Plans will show the plan, profile and typical section views.

Denoted on these views will be the construction staging sequence, utility locations on the bridge, column sizes, foundation types, barrier types, lighting, aesthetic treatments, slope protections and lane/shoulder widths. The Bridge General Plans as well as the supporting documentation for the selection of the alternatives will be compiled into a Type Selection Report. The Type Selection Report will be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Type Selection Report will follow Caltrans procedures outlined in Memo to Designers 1-29, “Structure Type Selection”, and OSFP Information and Procedures Guide, Section 4-2 “Structure Type Selection. The Report will include discussions of bridge types considered, site geometric and hydraulic constraints, site geotechnical data, costs of considered alternatives, environmental impacts, community concerns, construction duration, accelerated bridge construction potential, staging considerations and maintenance requirements.

Deliverable: Bridge Type Selection Report (Draft and Final), and Draft General Plan for Alternatives Selected (2 sheets total) Task 3.4 Geotechnical Investigation – Phase IV
This task covers the geotechnical investigations associated with Phase IV (underpass or overhead alternatives). Activities associated with this task include:
• Review available technical reports and documentation related to the project provided by the project owner and design team. We assume that site-specific topographic information will be provided for our use prior to initiating fieldwork. • Perform a site visit to review project limits, evaluate equipment access, and mark out our field exploration location. • Notify subscribing utility companies via Underground Service Alert (USA) a minimum of two working days (as required by law) prior to performing exploratory excavation at the site. • Pay for and obtain up to four (4) soil boring permits from the EHD. • Obtain an encroachment permit (anticipated no-fee) for our explorations within City right-of-way. • Any other required permitting (railroad, USACE, DFW, etc.) will be provided by others prior to scheduling the field investigation.
• Retain the services of a California C57-licensed drilling subcontractor to perform subsurface explorations. • Perform required railroad safety training.
• Traffic control is not anticipated to be required for these proposed explorations. • Drill up to five (5) borings to depths of up to 50-100 feet (depending on the design alternative chosen) using a trackmounted drill rig equipped with auger and mud rotary drilling equipment. The numbers, locations, and depths of borings will be dependent upon the alternative and alignment selected during the project feasibility evaluation. A maximum of 450 linear feet of drilling is anticipated for this task. Excess drill cuttings will be containerized and removed from the site for disposal. We anticipate that crawler rig access to the anticipated boring locations may require access to City and/or railroad right-of-way, with brush/tree branch clearing and possibly minor grading required to access the proposed project alignment. Access to the proposed drill locations is anticipated to be provided by the City and rights-of-entry into railroad right-of-way and/or private property are to be provided by the City or Dokken, if/as necessary. Such access is anticipated to consist of a minimum eight-foot-wide path (trees/branches, bushes, and debris removed, no slopes steeper than 2H:1V, and minimal cross-slope) to facilitate crawler rig access. However, if supplemental work is required to provide access to 602
exploration locations and it is not provided by City personnel, CONSULTANT can add such services to our scope by use of a subcontractor; however, supplemental permitting, coordination with the City and Dokken on exploration locations, and rightsof-entry (including temporary access clearance and possible minor grading activity) will need to be provided by others. • Log the borings in accordance with the latest Caltrans guidelines. • Obtain representative soil samples from the exploratory borings for laboratory testing. • Excess drill cuttings and drilling fluids will be containerized and removed from the site for disposal. • Perform up to two (2) CPT soundings up to 100-foot depth to further evaluate liquefaction potential and refine the site shear wave velocity profile, if necessary. Pore pressure dissipation tests and seismic shear wave velocity tests will be performed in these CPT soundings. CPT soundings are proposed up to 100-foot depth but may reach shallower refusal on hard/very dense soils, if present.
• Upon completion, backfill the borings and CPT soundings with neat cement grout. • Collect up to three (3) representative bulk surface soil samples from the project alignment. • Perform geotechnical laboratory tests to evaluate pertinent geotechnical parameters. Laboratory testing assignments will be based on soil conditions encountered during field exploration and may include in-situ dry density and moisture content, soil strength, gradation, plasticity, expansion potential, consolidation characteristics, sand equivalent, corrosion, and R-Value.
• Evaluate the field and laboratory testing data and prepare a PFR with our findings, conclusions, and recommendations.

The report will include, but not be limited to:
o Project description including proposed improvements, topography, drainage, and land-use; o Scope of work summary;
o Site Plan showing the locations of the explorations with respect to the proposed project features; o Site geology and subsurface conditions;
o Boring logs, including soil classifications and depth to groundwater (if encountered); o Logs of CPT soundings;
o Interpreted subsurface profile;
o Geotechnical laboratory test results;
o Screening-level soil corrosion potential;
o Seismic study in accordance with the latest Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria; o Geologic hazard evaluation (faulting, landslides, liquefaction, lateral spread, etc.); o Recommendations for embankment foundations and earthwork; o Preliminary slope stability evaluation (if necessary); o Preliminary structure foundation recommendations and associated design parameters; o Construction considerations;
o Pavement design recommendations; and
o Log of Test Borings (LOTB) drawing(s).

Deliverable: Draft/Final Preliminary Foundation Report
Task 3.5 Geotechnical Investigation – Phase V
This task covers the geotechnical investigations associated with cantilever alternatives for Phase V. (Geotechnical investigations associated with a new bridge crossing would be deferred to the Final Design phase to avoid the cost/schedule impacts of multiple permits.) Activities associated with this task include:
• Review available technical reports and documentation related to the project provided by the project owner and design team. We assume that site-specific topographic information will be provided for our use prior to initiating fieldwork. • Perform a site visit to review project limits, evaluate equipment access, and mark out our field exploration location. 603
• Notify subscribing utility companies via Underground Service Alert (USA) a minimum of two working days (as required by law) prior to performing exploratory excavation at the site. • Pay for and obtain up to four (4) soil boring permits from the EHD. • Obtain an encroachment permit (anticipated no-fee) for our explorations within City right-of-way. • Any other required permitting (railroad, USACE, DFW, etc.) will be provided by others prior to scheduling the field investigation.
• Retain the services of a California C57-licensed drilling subcontractor to perform subsurface explorations. • Perform required railroad safety training.
• Traffic control is not anticipated to be required for these proposed explorations. • Drill up to six (6) borings to depths of 75-100 feet using a track-mounted drill rig equipped with auger and mud rotary drilling equipment. The numbers, locations, and depths of borings will be dependent upon the alignment selected during the project feasibility evaluation. A maximum of 500 linear feet of drilling is anticipated for this task. Excess drill cuttings will be containerized and removed from the site for disposal. We anticipate that crawler rig access to the anticipated boring locations may require access to City and/or railroad right-of-way, with brush/tree branch clearing and possibly minor grading required to access the proposed project alignment. Access to the proposed drill locations is anticipated to be provided by the City and rights-of-entry into railroad right-of-way and/or private property are to be provided by the City or Dokken, if/as necessary. Such access is anticipated to consist of a minimum eight-foot-wide path (trees/branches, bushes, and debris removed, no slopes steeper than 2H:1V, and minimal cross-slope) to facilitate crawler rig access. However, if supplemental work is required to provide access to exploration locations and it is not provided by City personnel, CONSULTANT can add such services to our scope by use of a subcontractor; however, supplemental permitting, coordination with the City and Dokken on exploration locations, and rights-of-entry (including temporary access clearance and possible minor grading activity) will need to be provided by others. • Log the borings in accordance with the latest Caltrans guidelines. • Obtain representative soil samples from the exploratory borings for laboratory testing. • Excess drill cuttings and drilling fluids will be containerized and removed from the site for disposal. • Perform up to three (3) CPT soundings up to 100-foot depth to further evaluate liquefaction potential and refine the site shear wave velocity profile, if necessary. Pore pressure dissipation tests and seismic shear wave velocity tests will be performed in these CPT soundings. CPT soundings are proposed up to 100-foot depth but may reach shallower refusal on hard/very dense soils, if present.
• Upon completion, backfill the borings and CPT soundings with neat cement grout. • Collect up to three (3) representative bulk surface soil samples from the project alignment for pavement structural section design.
• Perform geotechnical laboratory tests to evaluate pertinent geotechnical parameters. Laboratory testing assignments will be based on soil conditions encountered during field exploration and may include in-situ dry density and moisture content, soil strength, gradation, plasticity, expansion potential, consolidation characteristics, sand equivalent, corrosion, and R-Value.
• Evaluate the field and laboratory testing data and prepare a PFR with our findings, conclusions, and recommendations.

The report will include, but not be limited to:
o Project description including proposed improvements, topography, drainage, and land-use; o Scope of work summary;
o Site Plan showing the locations of the explorations with respect to the proposed project features; o Site geology and subsurface conditions;
o Boring logs, including soil classifications and depth to groundwater (if encountered); o Logs of CPT soundings;
o Interpreted subsurface profile;
o Geotechnical laboratory test results;
604
o Screening-level soil corrosion potential;
o Seismic study in accordance with the latest Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria; o Geologic hazard evaluation (faulting, landslides, liquefaction, lateral spread, etc.); o Recommendations for embankment foundations and earthwork; o Preliminary slope stability evaluation (if necessary); o Preliminary structure foundation recommendations and associated design parameters; o Construction considerations;
o Pavement design recommendations; and
o Log of Test Borings (LOTB) drawing(s).

Deliverable: Draft/Final Preliminary Foundation Report (cantilever alternatives) Task 3.6 35% Plans & Estimate – Phase IV
CONSULTANT will prepare 35% plans for Phase IV that will include Title Sheet, Typical Cross Sections, Layout Plan/Profile, and a Structure General Plan (36 sheets total).

The title sheet will include an index of sheets, project description, location map, begin/end work/construction, and limits of work.

The typical section sheet will include original ground, pavement limits, shoulders, cut/fill slopes, existing right-of-way, and recommended structural sections. The plan/profile sheets will be double stacked and include all geometric data required to construct the project. A preliminary estimate will be prepared to reflect the probable cost to construct the project. The 35% plans and estimate will be submitted to the City for review.

Deliverable: 35% Plans and Estimate
Task 3.7 35% Plans & Estimate – Phase V
CONSULTANT will prepare 35% plans for Phase V that will include Title Sheet, Typical Cross Sections, Layout Plan/Profile, and a Structure General Plan (36 sheets total).

The title sheet will include an index of sheets, project description, location map, begin/end work/construction, and limits of work.

Deliverable: 35% Plans and Estimate
605
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 32 rev 12/4/23
EXHIBIT B – SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
Contract Start Date April 15, 2026
Contract End Date April 14, 2029
606
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Notice to Proceed 0 days Wed 4/15/26 Wed 4/15/26
2 Kickoff Meeting 10 days Wed 4/15/26 Tue 4/28/263 TASK 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS 170 days Wed 4/29/26 Tue 12/22/264 Task 2.1 Data Collection & Review 20 days Wed 4/29/26 Tue 5/26/265 Task 2.2 Survey 80 days Wed 5/13/26 Tue 9/1/266 Survey Request 10 days Wed 5/13/26 Tue 5/26/267 Task 2.2.1 Survey Control 10 days Wed 5/27/26 Tue 6/9/268 Task 2.2.2 Aerial Photogrammetric Topographic Mapping
40 days Wed 6/10/26 Tue 8/4/26
9 Task 2.2.3 Boundary Resolution 20 days Wed 8/5/26 Tue 9/1/26 10 Task 2.3 Geotechnical Assessment 60 days Wed 8/5/26 Tue 10/27/2611 Task 2.4 Utility/Drainage Investigation 80 days Wed 5/27/26 Tue 9/15/2612 Task 2.5 Property Ownership Investigation 20 days Wed 9/2/26 Tue 9/29/2613 Task 2.6 Hydraulic Assessment - Deep Water Channel
60 days Wed 5/27/26 Tue 8/18/26
14 Task 2.7 Existing Conditions Memorandum 40 days Wed 10/28/26 Tue 12/22/2615 TASK 3 PUBLIC OUTREACH 565 days Wed 5/27/26 Tue 7/25/2816 Task 3.1 Public Engagement Plan (PEP) 30 days Wed 5/27/26 Tue 7/7/2617 Task 3.2 Website and Outreach Materials 40 days Wed 7/8/26 Tue 9/1/2618 Task 3.3 Community Workshop 1 0 days Tue 12/22/26 Tue 12/22/2619 Task 3.3 Community Workshop 2 0 days Tue 10/26/27 Tue 10/26/2720 Task 3.3 Community Workshop 3 0 days Tue 6/13/28 Tue 6/13/2821 Task 3.4 Pop-Up Outreach Event 1 0 days Wed 11/25/26 Wed 11/25/2622 Task 3.4 Pop-Up Outreach Event 2 0 days Wed 12/9/26 Wed 12/9/2623 Task 3.4 Pop-Up Outreach Event 3 0 days Wed 9/29/27 Wed 9/29/2724 Task 3.4 Pop-Up Outreach Event 4 0 days Wed 10/13/27 Wed 10/13/2725 Task 3.4 Pop-Up Outreach Event 5 0 days Wed 5/17/28 Wed 5/17/2826 Task 3.4 Pop-Up Outreach Event 6 0 days Wed 5/31/28 Wed 5/31/2827 Task 3.5 One-on-One or Small Group Meetings 160 days Wed 12/23/26 Tue 8/3/2728 Task 3.6 Community Surveys 250 days Wed 12/23/26 Tue 12/7/2729 Task 3.7 Outreach and Engagement Memorandum 30 days Wed 6/14/28 Tue 7/25/2830 TASK 4 ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT 280 days Wed 12/23/26 Tue 1/18/2831 Task 4.1 Alternatives Development 50 days Wed 12/23/26 Tue 3/2/2732 Task 4.2 Railroad Coordination (UPRR/SERA) 40 days Wed 1/20/27 Tue 3/16/2733 Task 4.3 Right of Way Cost Estimate 20 days Wed 3/3/27 Tue 3/30/2734 Task 4.4 Constructability Assessment 50 days Wed 3/17/27 Tue 5/25/2735 Task 4.5 Advance Planning Studies 60 days Wed 3/17/27 Tue 6/8/2736 Task 4.6 Cost Estimates 40 days Wed 6/9/27 Tue 8/3/2737 Task 4.7 Design Alternatives Memo 60 days Wed 8/4/27 Tue 10/26/2738 Task 4.8 Preferred Alternatives Analysis 60 days Wed 10/27/27 Tue 1/18/2839 TASK 5 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY 45 days Wed 1/19/28 Tue 3/21/2840 Task 5.1 Preliminary Environmental Study Forms 30 days Wed 1/19/28 Tue 2/29/2841 Task 5.2 Preliminary Engineering ROW Checklist 15 days Wed 3/1/28 Tue 3/21/2842 TASK 6 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 105 days Wed 1/19/28 Tue 6/13/2843 Task 6.1 Implementation Plan 60 days Wed 3/22/28 Tue 6/13/2844 Task 6.2 Fact Sheets 20 days Wed 3/22/28 Tue 4/18/2845 Task 6.3 Funding Strategy 60 days Wed 1/19/28 Tue 4/11/2846 TASK 7 FEASIBILITY REPORT 140 days Wed 7/26/28 Tue 2/6/2947 Task 7.1 Draft Feasibility Report 60 days Wed 7/26/28 Tue 10/17/2848 Task 7.2 Presentations 40 days Wed 10/18/28 Tue 12/12/2849 Task 7.3 Final Feasibility Report 40 days Wed 12/13/28 Tue 2/6/29 4/15
12/22
10/26
6/13
11/25
12/9
9/29
10/13
5/17
5/31
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 2027 2028 2029
Sycamore Trail Phase IV & V
Feasibility Study
Project Development Schedule 607
Dokken Engineering
CDD26-088 Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V
Expires on 04/14/2029
2388811.1 7203.543 33 rev 12/4/23
EXHIBIT C – SCHEDULE OF FEES
608
COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

SYCAMORE TRAIL PHASE IV AND V FEASIBILITY STUDY
MILESTONE 1: FEASIBILITY STUDY
Chris Ladeas, PE
Principal in Charge&
QA/QC Manager
Pamela Dalcin‐Walling,
PE, QSD/P*
Project Manager
Eric Espinoza, PE*
Civil Project Engineer
Rob Burns, PE, SE*
Structures Project
Engineer
Marty Maechler, PE*
Railroad Coordination
Tony Powers, PE*
Active Transportation
Specialist
Senior Engineer2
Associate Engineer1
Assistant Engineer2
Assistant Engineer1
Senior CAD
CAD/Detailer2
Engineering Technician
Sarah Holm*
Environmental Lead
Senior Environmental
Planner2
Senior Environmental
Planner1
Associate Environmental
Planner
Environmental Planner
Right of Way Manager
Senior Right of Way
Agent
Right of Way Assistant TOTAL HOURS *TOTAL COST
FULLY BURDENED RATE $ 292.88 $ 295.80 $ 246.02 $ 289.95 $ 287.02 $ 278.23 $ 260.66 $ 172.80 $ 146.44 $ 128.87 $ 246.02 $ 164.01 $ 84.93 $ 307.52 $ 216.73 $ 181.58 $ 146.44 $ 111.29 $ 243.09 $ 190.37 $ 90.79 MILESTONE 1: FEASIBILITY STUDY
TASK 1.0 | PROJECT MANAGEMENT 4 112 30 60 12 5 5 228 60,838.80 $ Task 1.1 | Project Management Plan/Quality Control 4 12 16 $ 4,960.15 Task 1.2 | Meetings and Coordination 30 30 60 12 5 5 142 $ 34,124.13 Task 1.3 | Project Administration 50 50 $ 15,538.94
Task 1.4 | Project Schedule 20 20 $ 6,215.58
TASK 2.0 | LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS 16 36 2 2 2 102 8 110 40 8 8 8 342 59,232.60 $ Task 2.1 | Data Collection & Review 8222 8 88 38 $ 7,631.00Task 2.2 | Survey $ - Task 2.2.1 | Survey Control 2 2 $ 363.09
Task 2.2.2 | Aerial Photogrammetric Topographic Mapping 2 2 4 8 $ 1,864.67Task 2.2.3 | Boundary Resolution 2 2 4 8 $ 1,864.67 Task 2.3 | Geotechnical Assessment 24 10 16 $ 3,470.88
Task 2.4 | Utility/Drainage Investigation 2 6 30 40 40 118 $ 16,603.59Task 2.5 | Property Ownership Investigation 2 2 10 12 8 8 42 $ 6,941.75 Task 2.6 | Hydraulic Assessment - Deep Water Channel 2 4 4 10 $ 2,381.61 Task 2.7 | Initial Site Assessment 2 8 10 $ 3,206.25Task 2.8 | Existing Conditions Memorandum 2 8 30 50 90 $ 14,905.08 TASK 3.0 | CAREHOLDER COORDINATION + CIVIC ENGAGEMENT 56 56 56 56 40 8 8 280 56,715.60 $ Task 3.1 | Public Engagement Plan (PEP) 2 2 4 $ 1,138.50Task 3.2 | Website and Outreach Materials 2 2 8 12 $ 2,073.91 Task 3.3 | Community Workshops 24 24 36 36 40 8 168 $ 31,225.58 Task 3.4 | Pop-Up Outreach Events $ -Task 3.5 | One-on-One or Small Group Meetings 24 24 20 20 88 $ 20,000.62 Task 3.6 | Community Surveys 22 4 $ 1,138.50Task 3.7 | Outreach and Engagement Memorandum 2 2 4 $ 1,138.50 TASK 4.0 | DESIGN ALTERNATIVES CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTABILITY AND ANALYSIS 14 26 56 40 28 16 168 50 16 40 454 101,055.42 $ Task 4.1 | Alternatives Development 2 16 8 8 40 50 124 $ 23,563.80 Task 4.2 | Railroad Coordination (UPRR/SERA) 8 8 16 16 40 88 $ 21,514.51 Task 4.3 | Constructability Assessment 2 8 8 8 40 66 $ 15,071.23 Task 4.4 | Advance Planning Studies 2 2 24 16 12 16 48 16 40 176 $ 40,905.88 TASK 5.0 | ENGINEER’S OPINION OF PRELIMINARY COSTS ESTIMATES FOR DESIGN ALTERNATIVES 2 8 8 16 44 30 5 10 20 143 26,742.36 $
Task 5.1 | Cost Estimates 2 6 8 16 40 30 102 $ 20,314.47Task 5.2 | Right-of-Way Cost Estimate 24 5 10 20 41 $ 6,427.89 TASK 6.0 | PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 4 32162416 80 60 232 48,949.20 $ Task 6.1 | Design Alternatives Memo 2 16 8 16 8 40 30 120 $ 25,680.79Task 6.2 | Preferred Alternatives Analysis 2 16 8 8 8 40 30 112 $ 23,268.41 TASK 7.0 | PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY 2 6 16 16 16 12 70 3 5 146 25,145.39 $ Task 7.1 | Preliminary Environmental Study Form 1 2 8 8 8 12 70 109 $ 16,791.29 Task 7.2 | Preliminary Engineering Right-of-Way Checklist 1 2 3 5 11 $ 1,904.67 Task 7.3 | Field Review (OPTIONAL) 2 8 88 26 $ 6,449.43 TASK 8.0 | NEXT STEPS: PROJECT COORDINATION, FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES, PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS 10 26 58 60 154 28,480.88 $
Task 8.1 | Implementation Plan 4 8 20 20 52 $ 9,649.53Task 8.2 | Fact Sheets 24 12 4 22 $ 4,375.52 Task 8.3 | Funding Strategy 24 6 $ 1,655.44Task 8.4 | Alternative Refinement 816 20 44 $ 7,680.24Task 8.5 | Grant Application Support (OPTIONAL) 2 2 10 16 30 $ 5,120.16 TASK 9.0 | DRAFT + FINAL FEASIBILITY REPORT 12 32 4 60 38 8 14 12 30 4 8 4 226 42,869.01 $ Task 9.1 | Draft Feasibility Report 4 20 2 32 16 4 12 12 20 2 4 2130 2 $ 4,265.36 Task 9.2 | Presentations 84 8 12 32 $ 6,597.13Task 9.3 | Final Feasibility Report 8 2 20 10 4 2 10 2 4 264 1 $ 2,006.52 TOTAL HOURS WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS 4 226 248 86 66 46 32 618 8 388 16 40 80 44 8 22 24 108 14 34 37 2,149 TOTAL COST WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS $ 1,171.50 $ 66,851.66 $ 61,011.72 $ 24,935.38 $ 18,943.16 $ 12,798.64 $ 8,341.08 $ 106,788.11 $ 1,171.50 $ 49,999.62 3,936.24$ 6,560.40$ $ 6,794.70 $ 13,530.83 1,733.82$ 3,994.82$ $ 3,514.50 $ 12,019.59 3,403.21$ 6,472.54$ $ 3,359.28 $ 438,459.68 TOTAL HOURS WITH OPTIONAL TASKS 4 228 252 86 66 46 32 628 8 404 16 40 80 52 16 30 24 108 14 34 37 2,205 TOTAL COST WITH OPTIONAL TASKS $ 1,171.50 $ 67,443.27 $ 61,995.78 $ 24,935.38 $ 18,943.16 $ 12,798.64 $ 8,341.08 $ 108,516.08 $ 1,171.50 $ 52,061.46 3,936.24$ 6,560.40$ $ 6,794.70 $ 15,990.98 3,467.64$ 5,447.48$ $ 3,514.50 $ 12,019.59 3,403.21$ 6,472.54$ $ 3,359.28 $ 450,029.26 *Total Cost includes escalation. Please see consultants individual cost forms for detailed breakdown.

TASK DESCRIPTION

DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Milestone 1 Page 1 of 4
609
COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

SYCAMORE TRAIL PHASE IV AND V FEASIBILITY STUDY
MILESTONE 1: FEASIBILITY STUDY

TOTAL HOURS WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS

TOTAL COST WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS

TOTAL HOURS WITH OPTIONAL TASKS

TOTAL COST WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
*Total Cost includes escalation. Please see consultants individual cost forms for deta

TASK DESCRIPTION
Katie DeMaio*
Outreach Oversight
Project Manager
Darlene Tran
Graphic Design
Felix Molina
Senior Outreach
Coordinator
Outreach Coordinator TOTAL HOURS OTHER DIRECT COST *TOTAL COST Cathy Avila*
Project Manager
Senior Engineer
Assistant Engineer
Assistant Engineer
AdminTOTAL HOURS OTHER DIRECT COST *TOTAL COST
Melissa Ruth
Principal
Associate
Arbortist/ Construction
Manager
Project Manager
Designer
Accounting/ Controller TOTAL
HOURS
OTHER
DIRECT
COST
*TOTAL COST
$ 198.31 $ 160.28 $ 218.53 $ 142.33 $ 115.53 $ 220.84 $ 165.63 $ 109.29 $ 90.45 $ 78.87 $ 281.71 $ 274.66 $ 260.58 $ 225.36 $ 158.46 $ 281.71 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ 10 46 20 10 2 88 100.00 $ $ 14,721.24 $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ 10 - 46 20 10 2 88 100.00 $ $ 14,721.24 $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
80 86 49 133 115 463 8,900.00 $ $ 83,286.68 $ ‐ $ ‐ 6 35 114 8 163 100.00 $ $ 32,268.35 18 6 4 28 $ 5,540.42 $ - $ -
4 7 22 7 4 44 6,000.00 $ $ 14,385.74 $ - $ -
18 44 9 62 65 198 1,400.00 $ $ 31,045.62 $ - 6 35 114 8 163 100.00 $ $ 32,268.35 6 12 8 25 25 76 800.00 $ $ 12,390.63 $ - $ -
20 9 30 10 69 250.00 $ $ 11,354.75 $ - $ -
6 2 2 9 11 30 450.00 $ $ 5,061.73 $ - $ -
8 6 4 18 $ 3,507.79 $ - $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ 2.0 6 20 28 $ ‐ $ 7,239.59
$ - $ 2 - 6 20 28 $ 7,239.59
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ 0.5 1 0.5 4 6 12 $ ‐ $ 2,583.94
$ - $ 0.5 - 1 0.5 4 6 12 $ 2,583.94
$ - $ - $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
80 86 49 133 115 463 10 46 20 10 2 88 3 13 1 59 120 8 203 $ 15,864.41 $ 13,784.21 $ 10,707.77 $ 18,930.33 $ 13,285.65 $ 8,900.00 $ 83,286.68 $ 2,208.39 $ 7,618.95 2,185.86$ $ 157.74$ 904.54 $ 100.00 $ 14,721.24 $ 704.26 $ 3,570.62 $ 130.29 $ 13,296.51 $ 19,015.13 $ 2,253.64 $ 100.00 $ 42,091.88 80 86 49 133 115 463 10 46 20 10 2 88 3 13 1 59 120 8 203 $ 15,864.41 $ 13,784.21 $ 10,707.77 $ 18,930.33 $ 13,285.65 $ 8,900.00 $ 83,286.68 $ 2,208.39 $ 7,618.95 2,185.86$ $ 157.74$ 904.54 $ 100.00 $ 14,721.24 $ 704.26 $ 3,570.62 $ 130.29 $ 13,296.51 $ 19,015.13 $ 2,253.64 $ 100.00 $ 42,091.88 AIM CONSULTING AVILA & ASSOCIATES CALLANDER ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC.

Milestone 1 Page 2 of 4
610
COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

SYCAMORE TRAIL PHASE IV AND V FEASIBILITY STUDY
MILESTONE 1: FEASIBILITY STUDY

TOTAL HOURS WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS

TOTAL COST WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS

TOTAL HOURS WITH OPTIONAL TASKS

TOTAL COST WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
*Total Cost includes escalation. Please see consultants individual cost forms for deta

TASK DESCRIPTION
Sabrina Drago, PE
President
Adam Stephenson
Planning Manager
Associate Planner
Associate Planner
Junior Planner
Graphic Designer TOTAL HOURS *TOTAL COST
Zorne, Ewert, Juhrend
Principal Engr/ Geol/ Sci
Loutzenhiser, Silva, Staff
Senior Engr/ Geol/ Sci
Senior Project Engr/
Geol/ Sci
Project Engr/ Geol/ Sci
Senior Staff Engr/ Geol/
Sci
Staff Engr/ Geol/ Sci
Tech Illust/ CAD/
Drafter/ GIS
Admin Assitant/ Word
Processor TOTAL HOURS OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST
$ 410.54 $ 271.99 $ 198.33 $ 176.01 $ 115.51 $ 198.33 $ 235.17 $ 219.49 $ 188.13 $ 156.78 $ 141.10 $ 125.42 $ 172.46 $ 109.74 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ -$ - $ -$ - $ -$ - $ -
$ ‐ 10 46 4 106 16 36 26 8 252 18,020.00 $ $ 59,973.66
$ - $ -
$ - $ -
$ - $ -$ - $ -$ - $ -$ 4 - 40 4 32 16 36 16 4 152 $17,000.00 42,460.67 $ $ - $ -$ - $ -$ - $ - $ 6 - 6 74 10 4 100 $1,020.00 17,512.99 $
$ - $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ -
$ - $ -$ - $ -
$ - $ -$ - $ -$ - $ -$ - $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ -$ - $ -
$ - $ -
$ - $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ -$ - $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ -
$ - $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ -$ - $ -
$ - $ -
12 40 54 54 50 8 218 45,565.35 $ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ -
$ - $ -
6 16 14 14 20 70 15,088.89 $ $ -
$ - $ -
6 24 40 40 30 8 148 30,476.46 $ $ -
$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐
$ - $ -$ - $ -
$ - $ -
6 16 14 14 20 70 10 46 4 106 16 36 26 8 252
$ 2,463.25 $ 4,351.83 $ 2,776.56 $ 2,464.12 $ 2,310.17 $ - $ 15,088.89 $ 2,351.66 $ 10,096.47 $ 752.53 $ 16,618.42 2,257.60$ 4,515.19$ $ 4,483.84 $ 877.95 $ 18,020.00 $ 59,973.66 12 40 54 54 50 8 218 10 46 4 106 16 36 26 8 252
$ 4,926.50 $ 10,879.58 $ 10,709.58 $ 9,504.46 $ 5,775.42 $ 1,586.60 $ 45,565.35 $ 2,351.66 $ 10,096.47 $ 752.53 $ 16,618.42 2,257.60$ 4,515.19$ $ 4,483.84 $ 877.95 $ 18,020.00 $ 59,973.66 DRAGO VANTAGE GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC.

Milestone 1 Page 3 of 4
611
COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

SYCAMORE TRAIL PHASE IV AND V FEASIBILITY STUDY
MILESTONE 1: FEASIBILITY STUDY

TOTAL HOURS WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS

TOTAL COST WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS

TOTAL HOURS WITH OPTIONAL TASKS

TOTAL COST WITH OPTIONAL TASKS
*Total Cost includes escalation. Please see consultants individual cost forms for deta

TASK DESCRIPTION
Rob Markes
Survey Manager
Ryan Ming, PLS
Senior Land Surveyor
Todd Jordan, PLS
Land Surveyor
Roy Porter, LSIT
Land Surveyor
Party Chief
Rodman
Survey Technician/
Drafter TOTAL HOURS OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST
$ 258.82 $ 216.38 $ 170.86 $ 126.05 $ 240.95 $ 220.02 $ 93.83 $ ‐ $ ‐ 228 $ ‐ $ 60,838.80
$ 16 - $ 4,960.15
$ 142 - $ 34,124.13
$ 50 - $ 15,538.94
$ 20 - $ 6,215.58
10 16 20 40 32 32 40 190 6,720.00 $ $ 39,733.73 872 24,840.00 $ $ 173,661.23 $ 38 - $ 7,631.00$ - $ -
4 12 4 4 24 $ 4,929.49 26 $ 5,292.58
4 8 16 16 24 68 6,720.00 $ $ 18,749.68 76 $6,720.00 20,614.36 $ 2 16 40 12 12 16 98 $ 16,054.55 106 $ 17,919.23 $ 168 $17,000.00 45,931.54 - $ $ 118 - $ 16,603.59
$ 42 - $ 6,941.75
$ 98 $100.00 17,102.85 - $ $ 110 $1,020.00 20,719.25 - $ $ 90 - $ 14,905.08 $ ‐ $ ‐ 906 9,000.00 $ $ 172,270.62
$ 32 - $ 6,678.91$ 56 $6,000.00 16,459.65 - $ $ 529 $1,500.00 94,539.55 - $ $ 76 $800.00 12,390.63 - $ $ 157 $250.00 31,355.37 - $ $ 34 $450.00 - $ 6,200.22$ 22 - $ 4,646.29 $ ‐ $ ‐ 482 $ ‐ $ 108,295.01
$ 152 - $ 30,803.39
$ 88 - $ 21,514.51$ 66 - $ 15,071.23$ 176 - $ 40,905.88 $ ‐ $ ‐ 155 $ ‐ $ 29,326.30
$ 114 - $ 22,898.41$ 41 - $ 6,427.89
$ ‐ $ ‐ 232 $ ‐ $ 48,949.20
$ 120 - $ 25,680.79
$ 112 - $ 23,268.41
$ ‐ $ ‐ 146 $ ‐ $ 25,145.39
$ 109 - $ 16,791.29
$ 11 - $ 1,904.67$ 26 - $ 6,449.43
$ ‐ $ ‐ 372 $ ‐ $ 74,046.22
$ 52 - $ 9,649.53$ 22 - $ 4,375.52$ 76 - $ 16,744.32$ 44 - $ 7,680.24 $ 178 - $ 35,596.62
$ ‐ $ ‐ 226 $ ‐ $ 42,869.01
$ 130 - $ 24,265.36
$ 32 - $ 6,597.13
$ 64 - $ 12,006.52
10 16 20 40 32 32 40 190 3,415
$ 2,588.16 $ 3,462.08 $ 3,417.27 $ 5,041.87 $ 7,710.26 7,040.69$ 3,753.39$ $ 6,720.00 $ 39,733.73 $ 33,840.00 $ 693,355.75 10 16 20 40 32 32 40 190 3,619
$ 2,588.16 $ 3,462.08 $ 3,417.27 $ 5,041.87 $ 7,710.26 7,040.69$ 3,753.39$ $ 6,720.00 $ 39,733.73 $ 33,840.00 $ 735,401.79 GRAND
TOTAL
HOURS
GRAND

TOTAL OTHER

DIRECT COSTS

GRAND TOTAL
COST

UNICO ENGINEERING
Milestone 1 Page 4 of 4
612
COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

SYCAMORE TRAIL PHASE IV AND V FEASIBILITY STUDY
MILESTONE 2: PROJECT APPROVAL/ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION (OPTIONAL) Chris Ladeas, PE
Principal in Charge& QA/QC
Manager
Pamela Dalcin‐Walling, PE,
QSD/P*
Project Manager
Eric Espinoza, PE*
Civil Project Engineer
Rob Burns, PE, SE*
Structures Project Engineer
Marty Maechler, PE*
Railroad Coordination
Tony Powers, PE*
Active Transportation
Specialist
Senior Engineer2
Associate Engineer3
Associate Engineer1
Assistant Engineer2
Assistant Engineer1
Senior CAD
CAD/Detailer2
Sarah Holm*
Environmental Lead
Senior Environmental Planner 2
Senior Environmental Planner 1
Associate Environmental
Planner
Environmental Planner
Right of Way Manager
Senior Right of Way Agent
Right of Way Agent
Right of Way Technician TOTAL HOURS OTHER DIRECT COST *TOTAL COST FULLY BURDENED RATE $ 292.88 $ 295.80 $ 246.02 $ 289.95 $ 287.02 $ 278.23 $ 260.66 $ 202.08 $ 172.80 $ 146.44 $ 128.87 $ 246.02 $ 164.01 $ 307.52 $ 216.73 $ 181.58 $ 146.44 $ 111.29 $ 243.09 $ 190.37 $ 120.08 $ 79.08 MILESTONE 2: PROJECT APPROVAL/ENVIRONMENTALDOCUMENTATION (OPTIONAL)TASK 1.0 | PROJECT MANAGEMENT 2 112 30 60 16 5 10 235 $ ‐ $ 62,515.77 Task 1.1 | Project Management Plan/Quality Control 2 12 14 $ 4,344.75Task 1.2 | Meetings and Coordination 30 30 60 16 5 10 151 $ 36,416.51Task 1.3 | Project Administration 50 50 $ 15,538.94Task 1.4 | Project Schedule 20 20 $ 6,215.58 TASK 2.0 | ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION & PERMITTING 44 14 8 170 204 188 586 836 4 20 20 15 2109 2,000.00$ $ 354,930.88 Task 2.1 | CEQA (Phase IV & V) $ -
Task 2.1.1 | Draft CEQA IS/MND 2 16 8 12 24 120 182 $ 27,625.47 Task 2.1.2 | Notice of Availability and Public Circulation 8 8 8 8 8 8 16 32 96 $ 18,388.26Task 2.1.3 | Responses to Comments and Final IS/MND 2 2 16 8 8 24 80 140 $ 22,702.24 Task 2.2 | NEPA (Phase IV & V) $ -
Task 2.2.1 | Natural Environment Study and Wetland Delineation 2 8 8 40 40 100 198 $ 30,505.56 Task 2.2.2 | Historic Property Survey Report / Archaeological Survey Report 2 4 40 4 100 150 2,000.00$ $ 29,170.07 Task 2.2.3 | Extended Phase I Testing (Phase V) 2 4 80 4 100 190 $ 36,278.04 Task 2.2.4 | Historic Resources Evaluation Report/Finding of Effect 2 424 30 $ 7,378.69 Task 2.2.5 | Noise Technical Memorandum 2 46 60 72 $ 12,289.61 Task 2.2.6 | Visual Impact Assessment Advanced 2 6 8 40 120 176 $ 24,566.91 Task 2.2.7 | Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment (ISA) 2 24 8 $ 1,883.13 Task 2.2.8 | Hazardous Waste Phase II Testing 2 26 10 $ 2,190.84Task 2.2.9 | Community Impact Assessment 2 6 8 6 32 80 134 $ 19,803.69 Task 2.2.10 | Air Quality Technical Memorandum 2 28 60 72 $ 12,024.99 Task 2.2.11 | Water Quality Assessment 2 4 4 16 24 80 130 $ 18,923.66Task 2.2.12 | Biological Assessment USFWS and NMFS 2 16 8 40 24 200 290 $ 42,321.31 Task 2.2.13 | Location Hydraulic Study 2 24 8 $ 2,030.83 Task 2.2.14 | Relocation Impact Memorandum 2 6 4 2 10 10 10 44 $ 7,926.40Task 2.2.15 | NEPA Categorical Exclusion 2 4 16 24 46 $ 7,181.76Task 2.2.16 | Environmental Oversight 48 24 72 $ 20,086.77 Task 2.3 | Permits to Enter for Environmental Surveys 2 4 8 4 16 2 10 10 5 61 $ 11,652.67 TASK 3.0 | PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 8 40 160 36 14 8 48 474 104 440 24 64 1,420 $ ‐ $ 265,774.35 Task 3.1 | Preliminary/Final Hydraulic Report 8 8 $ 2,486.23 Task 3.2 | Refine Conceptual Designs 4 8 8 8 8 8 30 40 114 $ 23,551.50Task 3.3 | Bridge Type Selection 82 8 48 40 8 32 146 $ 27,680.85 Task 3.4 | Geotechnical Investigation - Phase IV 8 8 8 24 $ 6,990.98Task 3.5 | Geotechnical Investigation - Phase V 4 4 4 12 $ 3,495.49 Task 3.6 | 35% Plans & Estimate – Phase IV 4 8 70 4 2 16 198 32 200 8 16 558 $ 100,784.65 Task 3.7 | 35% Plans & Estimate – Phase V 4 8 70 4 2 16 198 32 200 8 16 558 $ 100,784.65 TOTAL HOURS 10 196 204 36 14 8 48 8 534 104 440 24 64 186 204 188 586 836 9 30 20 15 3,764 TOTAL COST $ 2,928.75 $ 57,977.54 $ 50,187.06 $ 10,438.07 $ 4,018.25 $ 2,225.85 $ 12,511.62 1,616.67$ $ 92,273.22 $ 15,229.50 $ 56,700.60 5,904.36$ $ 10,496.64 $ 57,198.50 $ 44,212.41 $ 34,137.51 $ 85,812.38 $ 93,040.53 2,187.78$ 5,711.06$ 2,401.58$ 1,186.14$ 2,000.00$ $ 683,221.01 *Total Cost includes escalation. Please see consultants individual cost forms for detailed breakdown.

TASK DESCRIPTION

DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Milestone 2 Page 1 of 3
613
COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

SYCAMORE TRAIL PHASE IV AND V FEASIBILITY STUDY
MILESTONE 2: PROJECT APPROVAL/ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION (OPTIONAL)

FULLY BURDENED RATE
MILESTONE 2: PROJECT APPROVAL/ENVIRONMENTALDOCUMENTATION (OPTIONAL)TASK 1.0 | PROJECT MANAGEMENT Task 1.1 | Project Management Plan/Quality ControlTask 1.2 | Meetings and CoordinationTask 1.3 | Project AdministrationTask 1.4 | Project Schedule TASK 2.0 | ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION & PERMITTING
Task 2.1 | CEQA (Phase IV & V)
Task 2.1.1 | Draft CEQA IS/MNDTask 2.1.2 | Notice of Availability and Public CirculationTask 2.1.3 | Responses to Comments and Final IS/MND Task 2.2 | NEPA (Phase IV & V)
Task 2.2.1 | Natural Environment Study and Wetland DelineationTask 2.2.2 | Historic Property Survey Report / Archaeological Survey Report Task 2.2.3 | Extended Phase I Testing (Phase V)Task 2.2.4 | Historic Resources Evaluation Report/Finding of EffectTask 2.2.5 | Noise Technical MemorandumTask 2.2.6 | Visual Impact Assessment AdvancedTask 2.2.7 | Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment (ISA)Task 2.2.8 | Hazardous Waste Phase II TestingTask 2.2.9 | Community Impact AssessmentTask 2.2.10 | Air Quality Technical MemorandumTask 2.2.11 | Water Quality AssessmentTask 2.2.12 | Biological Assessment USFWS and NMFSTask 2.2.13 | Location Hydraulic StudyTask 2.2.14 | Relocation Impact MemorandumTask 2.2.15 | NEPA Categorical ExclusionTask 2.2.16 | Environmental Oversight Task 2.3 | Permits to Enter for Environmental Surveys
TASK 3.0 | PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
Task 3.1 | Preliminary/Final Hydraulic ReportTask 3.2 | Refine Conceptual DesignsTask 3.3 | Bridge Type SelectionTask 3.4 | Geotechnical Investigation - Phase IVTask 3.5 | Geotechnical Investigation - Phase VTask 3.6 | 35% Plans & Estimate – Phase IVTask 3.7 | 35% Plans & Estimate – Phase V

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST
*Total Cost includes escalation. Please see consultants individual cost forms f

TASK DESCRIPTION
Cathy Avila*
Project Manager
Senior Engineer
Assistant Engineer
Assistant Engineer TOTAL HOURS *TOTAL COST
Melissa Ruth
Principal
Associate
Project Manager TOTAL HOURS *TOTAL COST
$ 220.84 $ 165.63 $ 109.29 $ 90.45 $ 281.71 $ 274.66 $ 225.36 $ ‐ $ ‐
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
24 82 16 122 23,069.33 $ 0.5 1 3 4.5 1,176.24 $
-$ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.5 1 3 5 1,176.24 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ $ - -$ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$
24 82 16 122 23,069.33 $ -$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
18 62 38 8 126 21,381.32 $ $ ‐
18 62 38 8 126 21,381.32 $ -$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
42 144 54 8 248 1 1 3 5
$ 9,275.24 $ 23,850.62 5,901.81$ $ 723.63 $ 44,450.65 $ 140.85 $ 274.66 676.09$ $ 1,176.24 AVILA & ASSOCIATES CALLANDER ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC.

Milestone 2 Page 2 of 3
614
COST PROPOSAL ‐ ESTIMATED HOURS BY TASK

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO

SYCAMORE TRAIL PHASE IV AND V FEASIBILITY STUDY
MILESTONE 2: PROJECT APPROVAL/ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION (OPTIONAL)

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL COST
*Total Cost includes escalation. Please see consultants individual cost forms f

TASK DESCRIPTION
Zorne, Ewert, Juhrend
Principal Engr/ Geol/ Sci
Loutzenhiser, Silva, Staff
Senior Engr/ Geol/ Sci
Senior Project Engr/ Geol/
Sci
Project Engr/ Geol/ Sci
Senior Staff Engr/ Geol/ Sci
Staff Engr/ Geol/ Sci
Tech Illust/ CAD/ Drafter/
GIS
Admin Assitant/ Word
Processor
Engineering Field Tech (PW)
Engineering Field Tech TOTAL HOURS OTHER DIRECT COST TOTAL COST Andrea Galvin
Principal Architectural
Historian
Jenna Kachour
Senior Associate Architectural
Historian
Amanda Duane
Senior Architectural Historian
Audrey von Ahrens
Senior Architectural Historian
Phoebe Rayburn
Architectural HistorianI
TOTAL
HOURS
OTHER
DIRECT
COST
*TOTAL COST
$ 235.17 $ 219.49 $ 188.13 $ 156.78 $ 141.10 $ 125.42 $ 172.46 $ 109.74 $ 172.46 $ 109.74 $ 270.93 $ 203.20 $ 170.30 $ 141.91 $ 81.28 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ 235 $ ‐ $ 62,515.77
$ - -$ 14 $ 4,344.75$ - -$ 151 $ 36,416.51
$ - -$ 50 $ 15,538.94$ - -$ 20 $ 6,215.58
10 14 70 8 4 38 8 152 30,130.00 $ $ 55,778.80 4 52 86 128 122 392 1,780.00 $ $ 64,727.25 2780 33,910.00 $ $ 499,682.51 $ - -$ $ -$ - -$ 182 $ 27,625.47$ - -$ 96 $ 18,388.26
$ - -$ 140 $ 22,702.24
$ - -$ $ -$ - -$ 198 $ 30,505.56$ - -$ 150 $2,000.00 $ 29,170.07 $ - -$ 190 $ 36,278.04$ 4 - 52 86 128 122 392 1,780.00 $ $ 64,727.25 422 $1,780.00 $ 72,105.94 $ - -$ 72 $ 12,289.61
$ - -$ 181 $ 25,743.15
2 2 6 2 12 $ 2,194.89 -$ 20 $ 4,078.02
8 12 64 8 4 36 8 140 $30,130.00 53,583.91 $ -$ 150 $30,130.00 $ 55,774.75 $ - -$ 134 $ 19,803.69
$ - -$ 72 $ 12,024.99$ - -$ 130 $ 18,923.66$ - -$ 290 $ 42,321.31$ - -$ 130 $ 25,100.16$ - -$ 44 $ 7,926.40 $ - -$ 46 $ 7,181.76$ - -$ 72 $ 20,086.77$ - -$ 61 $ 11,652.67 4 66 4 66 60 24 32 8 124 388 184,887.00 $ $ 250,670.84 $ ‐ $ ‐ 1934 184,887.00 $ $ 537,826.51 $ - -$ 134 $ 23,867.56$ - -$ 114 $ 23,551.50$ - -$ 146 $ 27,680.85 2 30 2 30 24 12 16 4 60 180 $86,051.00 116,622.61 $ -$ 204 $86,051.00 123,613.60 $ 2 36 2 36 36 12 16 4 64 208 $98,836.00 134,048.23 $ -$ 220 $98,836.00 137,543.72 $ $ - -$ 558 $ 100,784.65$ - -$ 558 $ 100,784.65
14 80 4 136 60 24 40 12 162 8 540 4 52 86 128 122 392 4,949 $ 3,292.33 $ 17,559.08 752.53$ 21,321.74 $ 8,465.99$ 3,010.13$ 6,898.21$ 1,316.93$ $ 27,937.76 877.95$ $ 215,017.00 $ 306,449.64 $ 1,083.72 $ 10,566.28 $ 14,645.59 $ 18,163.92 9,916.70$ $ 1,780.00 $ 64,727.25 $ 218,797.00 $ 1,100,024.80 GRAND
TOTAL
HOURS

GRAND TOTAL

OTHER DIRECT
COSTS

GRAND TOTAL
COST
GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC. GPA CONSULTING, INC.

Milestone 2 Page 3 of 3
615

COST PROPOSAL
Required Cost Proposal Template To Be Determined By Agency Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Project No. TBD Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate* Total
Principal in Charge & QA/QC Manager Chris Ladeas, PE 14 $ 100.00 $ 1,400.00 Project Manager Pamela Dalcin-Walling, PE, QSD/P* 424 $ 101.00 $ 42,824.00 Civil Project Engineer Eric Espinoza, PE* 456 $ 84.00 $ 38,304.00 Structures Project Engineer Rob Burns, PE, SE* 122 $ 99.00 $ 12,078.00 Railroad Coordination Marty Maechler, PE* 80 $ 98.00 $ 7,840.00 Active Transportation Specialist Tony Powers, PE* 54 $ 95.00 $ 5,130.00 Senior Engineer 3 STAFF 0 $ 100.00 $ -
Senior Engineer 2 STAFF 80 $ 89.00 $ 7,120.00
Senior Engineer 1 STAFF 0 $ 79.00 $ -
Associate Engineer 3 STAFF 8 $ 69.00 $ 552.00
Associate Engineer 2 STAFF 0 $ 65.00 $ -
Associate Engineer 1 STAFF 1,162 $ 59.00 $ 68,558.00
Assistant Engineer 3 STAFF 0 $ 59.00 $ -
Assistant Engineer 2 STAFF 112 $ 50.00 $ 5,600.00
Assistant Engineer 1 STAFF 844 $ 44.00 $ 37,136.00
Senior CAD STAFF 40 $ 84.00 $ 3,360.00
CAD/Detailer 2 STAFF 104 $ 56.00 $ 5,824.00
CAD/Detailer 1 STAFF 0 $ 44.00 $ -
Engineering Technician STAFF 80 $ 29.00 $ 2,320.00
Environmental Lead Sarah Holm* 238 $ 105.00 $ 24,990.00 Senior Environmental Planner 2 STAFF 220 $ 74.00 $ 16,280.00 Senior Environmental Planner 1 STAFF 218 $ 62.00 $ 13,516.00 Associate Environmental Planner STAFF 610 $ 50.00 $ 30,500.00 Environmental Planner STAFF 944 $ 38.00 $ 35,872.00
Right of Way Manager STAFF 23 $ 83.00 $ 1,909.00
Senior Right of Way Agent STAFF 64 $ 65.00 $ 4,160.00
Right of Way Agent STAFF 20 $ 41.00 $ 820.00
Right of Way Assistant STAFF 37 $ 31.00 $ 1,147.00
Right of Way Technician STAFF 15 $ 27.00 $ 405.00
Senior Appraiser STAFF 0 $ 58.00 $ -
Appraiser STAFF 0 $ 45.00 $ -
Appraiser Assistant STAFF 0 $ 31.00 $ -
Appraiser Technician STAFF 0 $ 27.00 $ -
5,969

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 367,645.00
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $18,612.03
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 386,257.03

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 103.48% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 399,698.77 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 0.00% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ -
h) General and Administrative (Rate: 62.77% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] 242,453.54 $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 642,152.31
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 102,840.93 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Historic Property Survey Report/Archaeological Survey Report (Optional) 1 LS 2,000.00 $ $ 2,000.00 i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 2,000.00
$39.00 - $59.00
$90.00 - $150.00
COST PROPOSAL 1

COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
March 11, 2026
Sycamore Trail Phase IV and V Feasibility Study
Range
$90.00 - $150.00
$90.00 - $150.00
$80.00 - $140.00
$80.00 - $115.00
$90.00 - $150.00
$90.00 - $150.00
$90.00 - $150.00
$30.00 - $60.00
$55.00 - $85.00
$35.00 - $65.00
$50.00 - $65.00
$44.00 - $57.00
$20.00 - $30.00
Description of Item
$55.00 - $85.00
$35.00 - $65.00
$25.00 - $40.00
$35.00 - $48.00
$65.00 - $95.00
$40.00 - $70.00
$33.00 - $45.00
$70.00 - $110.00
$25.00 - $40.00
$20.00 - $30.00
$65.00 - $95.00
$65.00 - $80.00
$55.00 - $75.00
$25.00 - $55.00
$50.00 - $80.00
$60.00 - $70.00
$80.00 - $120.00
$60.00 - $90.00
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 4 ends

616

COST PROPOSAL
Required Cost Proposal Template To Be Determined By Agency m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) • AIM CONSULTING $ 83,286.68
• AVILA & ASSOCIATES $ 59,171.90
• CALLANDER ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC. $ 43,268.12 • DRAGO VANTAGE $ 45,565.35
• GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC. $ 366,423.30
• GPA CONSULTING, INC. $ 64,727.25
• UNICO ENGINEERING $ 39,733.73
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ 702,176.32
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 704,176.32 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 1,835,426.59
*Employees will be billed at their actual pay rates within the ranges specified above. When actual rates change, employees will be billed at their updated rate.

NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.

Page 2 of 4 ends

617

COST PROPOSAL
Required Cost Proposal Template To Be Determined By Agency Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $61.59 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 5.0% = $64.67 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 5.0% = $67.91 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 5.0% = $71.30 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 5.0% = $74.87 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 5,969 = 1492 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 5,969 = 2985 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 5,969 = 1492 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 5,969 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 5,969 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 5,969
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 1492 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 2985 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 1492 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. $71.30
$61.59 $91,911.25
$64.67 $193,013.63
$67.91 $101,332.15
$71.30 $0.00
$74.87 $0.00
$386,257.03
$367,645.00
$18,612.03

1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology) Cost Per
Year
COST PROPOSAL 1

COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours)

25.0%

0.0%

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

25.0%

50.0%
100.000%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) $67.91
$367,645.00 5,969

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $61.59
$64.67

Page 3 of 4 ends

618

COST PROPOSAL
Required Cost Proposal Template To Be Determined By Agency

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address: 110 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 200, Folsom, CA 95630-4713 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

Professional Engineering, Environmental, and Right of Way Services I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).

John A. Klemunes, Jr. President
[email protected] 916-858-0642
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
3/11/2026
COST PROPOSAL 1
Certification of Direct Costs:

Page 4 of 4 ends

619

SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL
Required Cost Proposal Template To Be Determined By Agency Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: AIM Consulting
Project No. TBD Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Outreach Oversight Katie DeMaio* 80 $ 68.06 $ 5,444.80
Project Manager TBD 86 $ 55.01 $ 4,730.86
Graphic Design Darlene Tran 49 $ 75.00 $ 3,675.00
Senior Outreach Coordinator Felix Molina 133 $ 48.85 $ 6,497.05 Outreach Coordinator TBD 115 $ 39.65 $ 4,559.75
463

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 24,907.46
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $622.69
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 25,530.15

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 80.55% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 20,564.53 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 57.44% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 14,664.52 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 26.89% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ 6,865.06 j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 42,094.11
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 6,762.43 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Direct Costs Printing Postage $ 8,900.00
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 8,900.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 8,900.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 83,286.68
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
COST PROPOSAL 1

COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
January 20, 2026
Range
65-75
50-60
70-80
45-52
32-41
West Sacramento Sycamore Trail Extension
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 3 ends

620

SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL
Required Cost Proposal Template To Be Determined By Agency Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $53.80 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 5.0% = $56.49 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 5.0% = $59.31 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 5.0% = $62.28 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 5.0% = $65.39 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 463 = 232 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 463 = 232 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 463 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 463 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 463 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 463
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 232 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 232 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

COST PROPOSAL 1

COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $24,907.46 463

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $53.80
$56.49
$59.31
$62.28

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

50.0%

0.0%

0.0%
100.0%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year
$24,907.46
$622.69

Page 2 of 3 ends

621

SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL
Required Cost Proposal Template To Be Determined By Agency

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address: 2600 Capitol Ave, Suite 440 Sacramento CA 95816 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Public Engagement
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

Katie DeMaio President
[email protected] 916-442-1168
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract. 1/21/2026
COST PROPOSAL 1
Certification of Direct Costs:

Page 3 of 3 ends

622

SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL
Required Cost Proposal Template To Be Determined By Agency Note: Mark-Ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: Avila and Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Project No. TBD Contract No. TBD Date
Project Name

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hr Rate Total
Project Manager Cathy Avila* 52 $ 98.00 $ 5,096.00
Senior Engineer Staff 190 $ 73.50 $ 13,965.00
Assistant Engineer Staff 74 $ 48.50 $ 3,589.00
Assistant Engineer Staff 18 $ 40.14 $ 722.52
Admin Staff 2 $ 35.00 $ 70.00
Associate Engineer Staff 0 $ 53.50 $ -
336

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 23,442.52
b) Anticipated Salary Increases $2,771.35
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 26,213.87

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 40.20% ) c) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 10,537.97 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 15.42% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 4,042.18 h) General and Administrative (Rate: 49.24% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] 12,907.71 $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 27,487.86
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10% ] $ 5,370.17 l) CONSULTANT’S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
Travel (Mileage) $ 100.00
i) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 100.00
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ -
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] $ 100.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] $ 59,171.90
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
COST PROPOSAL 1

COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
January 29, 2026
Range
$90.00 - $100.00
$70.00 - $85.00
$40.00 - $52.00
$50.00 - $65.00
$40.00 - $52.00
$25.00 - $40.00
Deep Water Ship Channel
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant

Page 1 of 3 ends

623

SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL
Required Cost Proposal Template To Be Determined By Agency Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year
Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract
Proposal Rate Duration
= $69.77 Year 1 Avg
Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 1 + 5.0% = $73.26 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 + 5.0% = $76.92 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 + 5.0% = $80.77 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 + 5.0% = $84.81 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year
Year 1 * 336 = 84 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 336 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 336 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 336 = 252 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 336 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Total = 336
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(Calculated above) (Calculated Above)
Year 1 * 84 = Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 * 252 = Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 * 0 = Estimated Hours Year 5
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation =
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation =
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

COST PROPOSAL 1

COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM OR FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) $23,442.52 336

1. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) $69.77
$73.26
$76.92
$80.77

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

25.0%

0.0%

75.0%

0.0%
100.0%

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Cost Per
Year
$23,442.52
$2,771.35

Page 2 of 3 ends

624

SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL
Required Cost Proposal Template To Be Determined By Agency

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name**: Title**:

Signature: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Email**: Phone Number:

Address: 712 Bancroft Road #333, Walnut Creek, CA 94598 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Feasibility Research for hydrology/hydraulics and scour I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

Catherine M.C. Avila President
[email protected] 925-673-0549
23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract. 1/29/2026
COST PROPOSAL 1
Certification of Direct Costs:

Page 3 of 3 ends

West Sacramento City CouncilApril 15, 2026

West Sacramento City Council
April 15, 2026