CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2022
COUNCIL CHAMBERS 23873 CLINTON KEITH ROAD SUITE 106
WILDOMAR, CA 92595
REGULAR SESSION 6:00PM
Ben J. Benoit - Mayor/ Chair | District 1
Joseph Morabito - Mayor Pro Tem/ Vice Chair | District 3 Ashlee DePhillippo - Council Member/ Trustee | District 5 Bridgette Moore- Council Member/ Trustee | District 4
Dustin Nigg - Council Member/ Trustee | District 2
Daniel York, City Manager/General Manager Thomas D. Jex, City Attorney/District Counsel The City of Wildomar will be a Safe and Active Community with Responsible Growth and Quality Infrastructure while keeping a Hometown Feel
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
1 NOTICE:
City Council meetings may be live-streamed, photographed and/or videotaped. Participation at the
meeting constitutes consent by members of the public to the City’s and any third party’s use in any media, without compensation or further notice, of audio, video, and/or pictures of meeting attendees.
CALL TO ORDER – REGULAR SESSION - 6:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
FLAG SALUTE
PRESENTATIONS
1. Proclamations: Eagle Scouts Gavin and Hayden Dalton
2. Proclamation: Constitution Week
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
General Plan Update - Progress Report #3
Submitted By: Matthew Bassi
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive & file this report.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time when the Council receives general public comments regarding any items or matters within the jurisdiction that
do not
appear on the agenda.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
1. Community events
2. Regional events
3. Chamber of Commerce
4. Riverside Conservation Authority (RCA)
5. Riverside Transit Agency (RTA)
6. Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)
7. League of California Cities
8. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
9. Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA)
10. Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
11. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
12. Southwest Community Financing Authority (Animal Shelter)
13. Ad Hoc & Subcommittees
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED
The City Council to approve the agenda as it is herein presented, or, if it is the desire of the City Council, the agenda can be reordered, added to, or have items tabled at this time.
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
2 1.
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the Council, the Public, or Staff request to have specific items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
1.1 Reading of Ordinances
Submitted By: Janet Morales
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the reading by title only of all Ordinances on this agenda.
1.2 July 13, 2022 Minutes
Submitted By: Jandi Aguilar
1.3 Warrant Register August 2022
Submitted By: Robert
Howell
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the following:
For Fiscal Year 2021/2022
1. Warrant Register dated 08-04-2022 in the amount of $389,691.53.
2. Warrant Register dated 08-11-2022 in the amount of $1,139,300.36.
3. Warrant Register dated 08-17-2022 in the amount of $104,042.08.
4. Warrant Register dated 08-25-2022 in the amount of $327,123.02.
For Fiscal Year 2022/2023
1. Warrant Register dated 08-04-2022 in the amount of $69,106.50.
2. Warrant Register dated 08-11-2022 in the amount of $211,121.83.
3. Warrant Register dated 08-17-2022 in the amount of $37,116.19.
4. Warrant Register dated 08-25-2022 in the amount of $18,954.24.
5. Wire Transfer Register dated 08-31-2022 in the amount of $59,447.57.
6. Payroll Register dated 09-01-2022 in the amount of $315,781.81.
1.4 July 2022 Treasurers Report
Submitted By: Robert
Howell
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Treasurer’s Report for July 2022.
1.5 Road Construction Updates - Public Works/Engineering Department
Submitted By: Jason Farag
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file the Road Construction Updates from the Public Works/Engineering Department
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
3 1.6
Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05 - 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 222
Submitted By: Matthew Bassi
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 222
- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL RULE EXEMPTION PER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES, AND APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT NO. 2022-05 TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.256 AND SECTION
17.172.220 OF THE WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO
TEMPORARY EVENTS AND TEMPORARY USES OF LAND IN THE CITY OF
WILDOMAR
1.7 Zoning Ordinance No. 2022-06 - 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 223
Submitted By: Matthew Bassi
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 223
- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE OF
WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 16.72 TO TITLE 16 (SUBDIVISIONS), A NEW SECTION
17.204.110 TO CHAPTER 17.204 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS), AND A NEW CHAPTER 17.320 TO TITLE 17 (ZONING) FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 66411.7 AND 65852.21 (SB 9) RELATED TO URBAN LOT SPLITS AND TWO (2)-UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
1.8 2022 Conflict of Interest Code Biennial Notice Local Agencies
Submitted By: Janet Morales
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file the 2022 Conflict of Interest Code Biennial Notice for the City of Wildomar.
1.9 Wildomar Local Roadway Safety Plan (CIP 051-1)
Submitted By: Jason Farag
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2022 - ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A STATUTORY CEQA EXEMPTION PER SECTION 15262 (FEASIBILITY AND PLANNING STUDIES) OF CEQA AND ADOPTING
THE WILDOMAR LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
4 1.10
Calendar and Holiday Home Decoration Contests
Submitted By: Daniel Torres
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file the Calendar and Holiday Home Decoration Contests from by the Community Services Department.
1.11 Second Amendment to the Services Agreement between the City of Wildomar and Infinity Technologies for monthly IT and GIS Services
Submitted By: Robert
Howell
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to the Information Technology Services Agreement with Infinity Technologies.
1.12 Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Single Audit Report
Submitted By: Robert
Howell
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Single Audit Report
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
No items scheduled.
3. GENERAL BUSINESS
3.1 Wildomar Beautification Program Discussion
Submitted By: Daniel Torres
RECOMMENDATION:
Provide input and receive and file the conceptual program for the Wildomar Beautification Program.
3.2 Master License Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC) for Public Trail Use within RCFC Facilities
Submitted By: Jason Farag
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Master License Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC).
CITY MANAGER REPORT
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURN THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
5 4.
CEMETERY CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the Board, the Public, or Staff request to have specific items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion and/or action.
4.1 August 10, 2022, Cemetery Minutes
Submitted By: Jandi Aguilar
4.2 Warrant Register Cemetery August 2022
Submitted By: Robert
Howell
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the following:
For Fiscal Year 2021/2022
1. Warrant Register dated 08-04-2022 in the amount of $65.98.
2. Warrant Register dated 08-11-2022 in the amount of $1,784.65.
3. Warrant Registers dated 08-25-2022 in the amount of $253.75.
For Fiscal Year 2022/2023
1. Warrant Register dated 08-04-2022 in the amount of $29.10.
2. Warrant Registers dated 08-11-2022 in the amount of $4,564.30.
3. Warrant Registers dated 08-17-2022 in the amount of $190.71.
4. Warrant Registers dated 08-25-2022 in the amount of $600.96.
In accordance with Government Code Section 54952.3, I, Janet Morales, City of Wildomar City Clerk, do hereby declare that the Board of Trustees will receive no compensation or stipend for the convening of the following regular meeting of the Wildomar Cemetery District.
CALL TO ORDER THE WILDOMAR CEMETERY DISTRICT
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENTS
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED
The Board of Trustees to approve the agenda as it is herein presented, or, if it is the desire of the Board, the agenda can be reordered, added to, or have items tabled at this time.
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
6 4.3
July 2022 Cemetery Treasurers Report
Submitted By: Robert
Howell
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Treasurer’s Report for July 2022.
5. CEMETERY PUBLIC HEARINGS
No Items Scheduled.
6. CEMETERY GENERAL BUSINESS
No Items Scheduled.
GENERAL MANAGER REPORT
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURN THE WILDOMAR CEMETERY DISTRICT
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
7 PARTICIPATION
The City of Wildomar encourages your participation in the meeting. The following options are available for the public to participate:
1. You may view the Regular Session meeting live on the City of Wildomar’s website at http://www.cityofwildomar.org or on cable TV through Frontier Channel 36 or AT&T channel
99. To view from the website, select the live stream link on the top of the front page.
2. You may participate in person.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
During Public Comment not on the agenda and after each Agenda Item, the Mayor will announce Public Comment. If you would like to speak on that item, please fill out a speaker slip and submit it in the inbox at the front of the room. When the City Clerk announces your name, please come up to the podium. Public Comments are limited to 3 minutes or such other time as the Council may provide.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the City Clerk’s Office at 951-677-7751 x210.
REPORTS:
All agenda items and reports are available for review at City Hall, 23873 Clinton Keith Road and on the City’s website at the following address:
http://www.cityofwildomar.org/government/agendas___minutes. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available by appointment for public inspection at City Hall during regular business hours.
If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person that requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting, may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the City Clerk either in person or by phone at 951-677-7751, no later than 10:00 a.m. on the day preceding the scheduled meeting.
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Janet Morales, Wildomar City Clerk, do certify that at least 72 hours prior to the meeting, a true and correct copy of this agenda was posted at Wildomar City Hall, 23873 Clinton Keith Road; U.S. Post Office, 21392 Palomar Street; Wildomar Library, 34303 Mission Trail Blvd; and on the City’s website at www.cityofwildomar.org.
Janet Morales, CMC
City Clerk
Dated: September 8, 2022
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
8 CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
DEPARTMENT REPORT
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
General Plan Update - Progress Report #3
SUBMITTED BY:
Matthew Bassi, Planning
PREPARED BY:
Matthew Bassi, Planning Director
ACTION:
Receive & file this report.
BACKGROUND:
Staff provided the City Council with the General Plan Update Briefing #2 at its last meeting on August 10, 2022. That briefing primarily covered the month of July 2022. The following is a summary of the recent task assignments completed during the month of August 2022 and the exciting tasks coming forth over the next 30+ days. For more details, please peruse the General Plan Update project website: https://envisionwildomar2040.com.
DISCUSSION:
Citywide Workshops (virtual and in-person) Summary Reports PlaceWorks has completed the Summary Reports from our Citywide Workshop. These will be posted on the GP webpage and are provided as attachments herein. To accompany the summary reports, we have compiled appendices, which include the raw results from each activity. Those are available for download from the website and are also provided as attachments herein:
* Attachment A – Envision Wildomar Survey
* Attachment B - In-person Community Workshop Boards
* Attachment C - Virtual Community Workshop Jamboard – Group 1 * Attachment D - Virtual Community Workshop Jamboard – Group 2 * Attachment E - Envision Wildomar Survey Results/Summary
Let’s Envision Wildomar Survey
* Conducted over an 8-week period from June 13 - August 7, 2022. * Survey promoted through the GP website, city email listserv, city Facebook page, 9 Murrieta/Wildomar Chamber of Commerce, two (2) in-person pop-ups at Coffee with the City, and Wildomar’s 14th Birthday Celebration.
* 222 Total Survey Responses
Upcoming Items (Next 30+ days):
* Finalization of the Stakeholder Interviews in Sept/Oct 2022; * General Plan Advisory Group meeting #2 (September 15, 2022); * GP Update “Pop Event” scheduled for Mariachi Night at Marna O'Brien Park (Sept. 17); * Community Workshop #2 (Land Use) coming in Oct. 2022 +/-
Website Update:
* 1,098 unique visitors since the website was launched on June 14, 2022 * 232 total unique visitors in the month of August (193 new visitors) * Average of 7 website visits per day
* Most popular days included 8/2 (23 visitors); 8/1 (19 visitors); 8/5 (15 visitors).
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A-Envision Wildomar Survey Summary.pdf
Attachment B - Community Workshop1 Boards (In-person).pdf Attachment C - Community Workshop 1 Jamboard (Group 1).pdf Attachment D - Community Workshop 1 Jamboard (Group 2).pdf Attachment E - Envision Wildomar Survey Results.pdf
10 Wildomar’s General Plan Update – Survey #1 SUMMARY | 1
Envision Wildomar 2040
Let’s Envision Wildomar Survey Summary
OVERVIEW
The Let’s Envision Wildomar Survey was conducted over an 8-week period to capture community values, concerns, and aspirations for the City of Wildomar over the next 20 years. Community responses to the survey will be used to craft the General Plan Vision Statement and ensure that the General Plan Update reflects the values of the community. The survey was available online in English and Spanish from June 13, 2022 to August 7, 2022. The survey was promoted on the Envision Wildomar 2040 project website, through the City’s weekly email listserv, City Facebook page, and shared by the Murrieta/Wildomar Chamber of Commerce. The survey was also promoted at two in-person pop-up events, including the Chamber’s Coffee with the City on June 14, 2022 at the Corporate Room and Wildomar’s 14th Birthday Celebration on July 9, 2022 at Marna O’ Brien Park. The survey included four questions followed by optional demographic questions. The following summarizes community responses to each question. Responses to each question were organized into themes.
The top 10 themes are shown for each question, followed by the number of times each theme appeared for each question. Complete survey responses are included in an appendix to this summary.
222 Total Survey Responses
Q1: What do you like about Wildomar? (Use 3 words or phrases) Words Count Rank
Small Town 78 1
Rural 70 2
Proximity to goods/services 34 3
Quiet 31 4
Friendly 31 4
Open Space 30 5
Community 26 6
No Traffic 17 7
Affordable 16 8
Safe 16 8
Freeway access 14 9
Family Oriented 13 10
11 Wildomar’s General Plan Update – COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 SUMMARY | 2
Q2: What challenges face the City of Wildomar? (Use 3 words or phrases) Words Count Rank
Infrastructure 92 1
Safety 50 2
Urbanization 48 3
Traffic 44 4
Businesses that reflect community needs 26 5
Homelessness 23 6
Drug use 15 7
Cleanliness 14 8
Timely Development 12 9
Employment for all skill levels 12 9
City Funding 11 10
Q3: What would you like to see more of? (Use 3 words or phrases) Words Count Rank
Community Amenities 70 1
Infrastructure 69 2
Safety measures 50 3
Commercial 40 4
Trails 22 5
Open space 20 6
Community Events 19 7
Restaurants 19 7
Fresh Food options 15 8
less development 13 9
Cleanliness 11 10
Q4: What’s your vision of Wildomar? (Open Ended)
Words Count Rank
Community Amenities 54 1
Rural 44 2
Infrastructure 44 2
Small Town Feel 36 3
Open Space 31 4
Safe 28 5
Less development 28 5
Activities 26 6
Planned Growth 24 7
Cleanliness 22 8
Commercial 19 9
Family Oriented 18 10
12 Wildomar’s General Plan Update – COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 SUMMARY | 3
Summary of Demographic Question Responses
• 96% of responses live in Wildomar’s zip code (92595); 191 Responses • Race / Ethnicity (195 responses)
o White 133 (68%)
o Two or More 24 (23%)
o Hispanic or Latino 18 (9%)
o Other 10 (5%)
o Black or African 3 (1.5%)
o Asian 2 (1%)
•
Age Count Rank Percent
20-29 5 6 2.36%
30-39 34 4 16.04%
40-49 42 2 19.81%
50-59 41 3 19.34%
60-69 58 1 27.36%
70+ 32 5 15.09%
Grand Total 212 100.00%
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 1
What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
1 1. Small Town
2. Tranquil
3. Mostly friendly
1. Ever increasing regional
population
2. Too few parks
3. Rude drivers
1. Parks
2. Live entertainment
3. More shopping choices
for non food items
Growth that doesn't outpace infrastructure. Measure twice and cut once. Don't delay important things that will only cost twice as much to do ten years from now. Don't allow freeway billboard sign blight. We need our own police substation, and a community center. We're a small town, so we don't expect all what bigger towns have, but that doesn't mean we want nothing.
92595 50-59
American_Indian_and_Alaska_Nat
i,Asian,Black_or_African_American
,Hispanic_or_Latino,Native_Hawaii
an_and_Other_Pacif,White,Two_o
r_More_of_the_above_Races/
2 1. Local
2. Welcoming
3. Friendly
1. Urbanization
2. Traffic
3. Over developed
1. Coffee shops
2. Bakeries
3. Parks
A small town rural community that is welcoming and friendly and a stop for the weary. It’s a city that connect family and friends in areas that to meet up such as the local coffee shop or park. 92595 30-39 White 3 1.small hometown feel
2.open land, not filled up
with developments
3.Low light pollution
1.maintaining country feel
2.min. growth
3. Get worthy new
businesses
1.more youth programs
2.senior programs
3.Winco
A cohesive, thriving community. Where private & public entities work together to better our community. Promote volunteering both for young & old on community projects. 92595 60-69 Hispanic_or_Latino 4 1. Affordability
2. Close to hospital and
supermarkets
3. Semi-rural lifestyle
1. Traffic
2. Climate change
3. Inflation/expenses
1. Public transit
2. Mixed-use development
3. Active transportation
In 2040, Wildomar will remain one of the fastest-growing cities in California with a population approaching 50,000, but it will remain as vibrant as ever. Inland Valley Medical Center and the shopping centers on Clinton Keith Road will still exist, but there will be more economic development opportunities (such as big-box stores) on Bundy Canyon Road and a tree-lined corridor on Wildomar Trail that leads to a well-defined downtown with eateries and breweries. There will be more frequent bus service to Temecula and Lake Elsinore, more bike lanes and pedestrian trails, well-paved streets, and a rail line along I-15 that stops right in front of the hospital and takes cars off the freeway. The once-proposed Mount San Jacinto College campus will be built and become the most widely-attended in the system. Most importantly, the area’s safety, affordability and natural beauty will be preserved, and it will be a place that people will continue to want to call their home.
92592 20-29 White
5 1. Not overly crowded
2. Lots open space
throughout the City
3. 1. CRIME! LE and/or
RiversideCo officers are not
sufficient. We need our
own dept!
2. Homelessness and drugs
1. Parks and recreation.
Sport parks, pump tracks,
community center w/pool
2. Police presence.
3. Breweries
An open space country living vibe where crime rates are low. I'd like to see more places like parks/recreation for our youth. More businesses/restaurants that provide the City adequate tax revenue to sustain maintenance of City streets and funding for our OWN police department.
Maybe a amphitheater for small festivals or concerts. A community recreation center with a pool that provides year around classes for things like fitness/sports/summer leisure, local team youth activities/summer camps, and senior citizen activities.
Making Wildomar a place where residences can spend their time AND money in the city they live in rather than driving to Temecula or Murrieta for everything worth doing.
92595 30-39
6 1.Where I live, next to a
field.
2.Friendly
neighbors/community.
3.Nature.
1.Bundy Canyon Road
expansion has stalled.
2.More roads/wider roads
needed.
3.Grocery store needed.
1.Grocery Store near Bundy
Canyon Rd.
2.Trade Joe's store.
3.Less home building.
Wildomar has it's beauty from the wildlife and nature in the area. I hope to see this remain by not building it up as much as the neighboring cities. A Trader Joe's store would be welcome. 92595 60-69 White 7 1. The proximity to both
San Diego and OC
2. The mix of open space
and tract homes
3. The weather
1. Growing with a plan
2. Lack of smaller,
affordable homes to buy:
condos, townhomes
3. Need more employers
1. More affordable housing
to buy
2. More businesses to
employ residents
3. Communication from
city official
My vision for Wildomar is that it becomes a welcoming, safe and clean city for all demographics and political ideologies.
I'd like it to be a place where people can buy a home, raise a family if they choose, and send their kids to highly regarded schools. I want retirees to want to live out their lives here and be able to access healthcare and stores. My vision includes neighborhood parks with recreation centers and activities for children and teens. I'd like to see summer programs at the parks like we had in the 1970's: swimming and tennis lessons, art classes, indoor and outdoor organized games and sports. I would also like a dedicated "downtown" area where the city offices are located. 92595 50-59 Black_or_African_American
8 1.Rural
2. 3.
1. Infrastructure
2. Aging water and sewer
system
3. Aging tract home
communities
1. Access to open space
2. Murrieta Creek Trail
3. Remain a rural bedroom community 92595 60-69 other
43 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 2 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
9 1. rural small community
feel
2. open spaces and hillsides
3. small business friendly
1.overdevelopment
2.housing: density vs city
vision
3.protect small business
while welcoming large corps
1. green belts
2.public parks
3.recreational businesses
providing activities
I love Wildomar's small hometown feel! We have lots of open space and beautiful views we should preserve as part of Wildomar's image. Greenbelts and community parks are an important part of housing developments. Preserving the city's ag/ranch feel while meeting density requirements is a challenge that needs unique solutions. larger lot-size developments that are zoned/suitable for horses/small farms to fit our horse-town image can be balanced with multi- family housing developments. I don't want to become a sea of tract homes like Murrieta! Small business should be prioritized over large out of state corporations; it keeps with the small hometown image and keeps company profits circulating and benefiting our local economy. Attracting businesses that provide unique services not found in neighboring cities will help differentiate ourselves. Creative mixed zoning that allows small markets in residential areas:
decentralizing resources encourages pedestrian activity and reduces traffic 92595 40-49 White
10 1.small town
2. Lived here since
population 800
3. Nice community
1. Code enforcement
2. Too much growth
3. Little league doesn’t
seem to use their budget
for field & kids
1. More fields
2. More code enforcement
3. Street sweepers
No more new houses or commercial buildings. 92595 40-49 White 11 1. A small town feel
2. Relatively open spaces
3. The diversity of residents
1. The roads are terrible
2. The business tax base is
limited
3. General city
improvements are lax
1. City pride
2. Attracting better
businesses
3. Fix the roads
Community, improved infrastructure, planned events, code enforcement, beautification. 92595 50-59 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac es/
12 1.not too much traffic
2. Love the family feel of
the schools
3. Love that lots of families
know each other
1. School reputation - need
duel immersion through k-
8. Diff languages.
-clean neighborhoods
-Infrastructure
1. The neighborhoods need
to be cleaned up/ more
code enforcement
2. Traffic enforcement at
stop signs
3. Wildomar is still small and so in a great place to grow as a progressive, fun, beautiful city. To get there, we need more educated home owners, a better reputation for our schools and a cleaner city. If we can do that and keep the small town feel, I think we can be a one in a million city. Start by offering programs in the schools that are not offered in the neighboring cities- duel immersion of several language choices k-8, could be one. And let’s get the schools looking beautiful. So many of them seem rundown and sad.
We could also make more trails for horses and walkers. Making the walkability of the city better would draw in more families. Making those trails accessible to horses keeps the rural feel of the city. Finally, we’ve got to clean up some of the eyesore properties. I think having stricter code enforce rules would go a long way in improving the reputation of the city. We can’t let this town seem like a place where druggies and low class folks like to live. 92595 40-49 White
13 1.the vibe
2.the views
3.how close it is to bigger
areas but not as crowded
1. 2.
3. 1.more sprout/activities for
kids
2. Better middle school
3. More parks/splash pad
A great place to raise a family with more activitis/sport leagues and parks like our surrounding areas. I wish we could break away from LEUSD and part of murrietta school district. 30-39 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac es/
14 1.People friendly town
2.Those that run things are
really just one of us.
3.Events put on by city.
1.Too much growth
2.New low income housing
in medium income housing
areas.
3.No street sweeping.
1.Open comunication.
2.More of the events for
the people of the city.
3.Police presence in
neighborhoods.
My vision would never happen. I grew up in Huntington Beach in the 1960s when it was still country living like Wildomar.
Today it is such a sad place. It is big time citified and that makes me almost come to tears when I visit the old homestead. Keep WIldomar a city in the country.
92595 70+ White
15 1. No multi story
commercial buildings to
obstruct view.
2. Generally quiet.
1. Crime, drugs and car
racing
2. 3.
1. Public parks with trees
2.community events
3. Clean, safe, community
Affordable housing
Community garden/farmers market- not in Elsinore.
92595 70+ White
16 1.small town feel
2.not crowded
3.friendly people
1.drugs
2.transients
3.not much to do
1.parks
2.shops
3.restaurants
I would like to see more activities being advertised for our youth. Concerts at the park, family activities. Wildomar has so much space but every time something is being built it’s either a gas station, smoke shop, liquor store, more homes or another fast food place.
92595 40-49 Hispanic_or_Latino
17 1.parks
2. Business
3. Farming
1.sidewalks
2.maintained streets
3.lack of trees and
vegetation
1.Trees
2. Side walks
3. More fresh food
Side walks and bike lanes down main streets. Trees and vegetation every where. Smaller and more affordable housing in empty lots. Please do not keep allowing massive, expensive dwellings to be built. More schools need to be built before housing. A Splash pad park. More family friendly businesses. 30-39 White
44 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 3 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
18 1. Quiet
2. Suburb
3. Family friendly
1. Too many marijuana
stores
2. Government/ affordable
housing
3. Approval of big chain
stores to be built
1. Family owned
businesses/shops
2. Own school district
3. Community events
Wildomar is a growing suburb that has potential to be a great city! We need to have a great schools, family owned businesses, and safe places for kids to play. A park with a pool and toys for families. Keep out businesses that are not family friendly. Marijuana stores attract crime. Keep out big chain stores. Keep Wildomar with that small city feel. 92595 40-49 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac
es/
19 1. Green
2. Part rual
3. Hardly any homeless
1. Too many new houses
2. Not enough professional
and blue collar jobs
3. 1. Professional and blue
collar jobs
2. Youth programs
3. I don't know at the moment 92595 60-69 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac es/
20 1. Quiet
2. Rural
3. Unpretentious
1. Population boom
2. Loss of small community
feel
3. Infrastructure (see nos. 1
& 2)
1. Not buildings or car
washes
2. Not houses or
apartments
3. Not fast-food or gas
stations
Keep it small-town. No more "progress." Fix existing roads and infrastructure. 92595 50-59 White 21 1.Rural/country feeling
2.Diversity (business,
shopping)
3.Space
1.Crime/homeless
2.Infrastructure needs
improvement
3.Some parts need clean-up
1.Small grocery, esp in
Northwest. Like Trader Joes.
2.Old Town/Farmers market
3.Community events
Keep that country, spacious feeling. Bring in local grocery, small business. Old town/down town,farmer markets. 92595 50-59 White 22 1.quiet
2.rural
3.home
1. Police response
2. Infrastructure
3.not enough jobs if not
retail or food
1.higher paying jobs
2.police presence
3.bike lanes
A safe still rural town with some industrial areas and jobs where you don’t have to commute. 92595 50-59 White 23 1.Wildomar is rural
2.Quite
3.small town community
1.poor road conditions
2.urban sprawl coming
3.poor community
development
1.bike & hiking trails &
parks
2. Improved community
development
3. Improved land scape
streets & roads.
I would like to see Wildomar as a community that is well planned out and welcoming to the people who live here. Bundy Canyon would no longer be a death trap to pedestrians and bike cycle riders. I would like Wildomar to remain rural with open spaces that are not a bunch of strip malls and littered with blight. 92595 60-69 American_Indian_and_Alaska_Nat
i,White
24 1.small town
2.not cookie cutter
3.areas of rural
1. People wanting it to be
like Temecula
2.old kranks
3. 1. Large lots when building
homes
2.apartments done nicely
and affordable.
3. A place with more city maintained spaces. 92595 60-69 White 25 1. Low taxes
2. Backyard Fruit trees,
gardens, and livestock
3. Friendly people and
businesses
1. Trying to be like other
cities
2. Road maint./mobility
3. “legal” marijuana cost to
city & crime
1. Small businesses along
palomar/mission trail
2. Lower fees to build 2nd
homes on property
3. Road repair
Family friendly, safe, improve current parks with water features and swings and structures for adults with disabilities.
Encourage agriculture and grow local, water storage, private funded art, 92595 26 1. Smaller town feel in the
right places
2. Having council members
available when needed
3. 1.Staff salaries, being
overstaffed
2. Bandaiding the roads
3.Pushing home based
businesses out of the city
1. fix the roads and leave
everything else alone
2. 3.
Honestly, don't try to make us something we are not. This is a bedroom community, and we don't need 1/2 the staff that is hired. Fix the roads, figure out a way to get the drug houses closed down, and get City Hall into someplace that we are paying through the roof with nothing to show in the end. 92595 60-69 White
45 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 4 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
27 1. Proximity to I15
2. Small, rural population
3. The right amount of
commercial development
1. Road maintenance
2. Beautification
3. Commercial
maintenance, ie: Palomar
Plaza
1. Public spaces
2. Nature parks/trails
3. Local historical
sites/monuments/parks
A planned, uniform building style (like The Barn on Clinton Keith and Palomar ), a main central community and/or government space, a local paper or circular 92595 50-59 White 28 1.love the country feel
2. Love our mountains
3. Love our diversity
1. Traffic
2. Rapid growth
3. Street degradation
1. Winco store
2. Horse trails
3.bike trails
A quiet, diverse community. Keep commercial businesses near the freeway. Homes away from the freeway. 92695 60-69 White 29 1. Quiet neighborhood
2. Not as much traffic as
Temecula and Murrieta
3. Little more rural not as
developed
1. Run down/littered
homes and property- needs
enforced- fire hazards
2. Homeless people
3. Drug houses
1. Less condos/track homes
2. More trees and greenery
3. Better restaurants (no
more chains, no car wash)
A safe and clean community to raise families. Better school ratings. Support more small business. Stop developing condos and track homeS. Start enforcing cleanup for properties littered with trash and broken down crap everywhere- they’re fire hazards and no one wants to live next to them. More trees or parks and keep open space. Stop building on every available inch of open land, instead clean them up and plant trees and build parks. Need more greenery. 92595 30-39 White
30 1.close to everything.
2.friendly
3.family values
1.traffic
2.affordability
3.crime
1our own stores.
2.couple more gas stations
3.a college
Keep it rural, simple and affordable. 92595 60-69 White 31 1.Rural atmosphere with
open space
2. Balanced housing to
business
3.Good people and good
neighbors
1.slowing growth
2.we owe Wildomar
citizens housing not the
nation (no build, build
build)
3.balance/caution
1.parks
2.trails
3.24 he fitness
Live here until the good Lord decides otherwise 92595 60-69 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac es/
32 1. Rural
2. Friendly
3. Accessible
1. Homelessness
2. Poor choices for new
business
3. Crime
1. Parks!
2. Green space
3. In n Out or Chic fil a
Wildomar should be a community with plenty of parks and safe neighborhoods with a rural feel. It’s accessibility to the 15 freeway and low taxes should help it continue to grow as a great place for families. 92595 50-59 White 33 1.Small Community
2.Very Convenient
3. 1.Needs better parks .
2.parks should have
restrooms and water.
3.no water or restrooms at
some parks
1.Shopping
2.Parks
3.Bike trails for kids.
More shopping to avoid Temecula. Better parks and open space for trails. 92595 70+ White 34 1.location
2.community
3.potential
1.living cost
2.potholes
3.traffic on the 15
1.night life
2.activities
3.putting stuff on all the
dirt lots around
A city that isn’t half dirt lots and apartment buildings, I think it would be beneficial for the city and its community to have activities in the city, bringing in new businesses and restaurants and bars, a downtown area. So that I don’t have to leave the valley to have fun.
92595 20-29 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac
es/
35 1. Small city vibes
2. The local restaurants and
coffee places
3. Quickness of the
response of counsilmember
1. Not enough sports focus
2. Expanding but not
thinking of traffic
3. Not fixing the roads
1. Youth sports
2. City rec center
3. City events
I hope Wildomar will become a great place people will want to come to. There is a lot of “new Wildomar” vs “old Wildomar” and its clashes against each other. I hope that the city will unify and come together to be the new “it” place to hang out and be.
92595 20-29 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac
es/
36 1.Rural atmosphere
2.Location
3.Available resources
(stores, hospitals, etc.)
1.Traffic
2.Dirt roads
3. 1.
2. 3.
A rural feel, horse town type atmosphere. Not over developed like our fine neighbors in Murrieta. A Norco, Ca feel. large expensive estate properties'. 92595 60-69 White
37 1. It's like Temecula 30
years ago.
2. 3.
1. Roads
2. Old Trailers and
manufactured homes.
3. 1. Upscale very nice tract
housing developments that
have Associations
2. 3.
The finest city in Southern California. 92595 60-69 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac es/
46 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 5 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
38 1.Rural Feel
2.The Dairy!
3.Easy access to freeways
1.Too much development
2.Infrastructure
3.Water
1. Water conservation
2.Public Works department
expanded (roads, etc)
3.open space preservation
A small town that retains the small town feel with locally owned and operated business. Not the next Temecula... We need thoughtful and spread out planning and not focus on putting everything in one corridor. Spread it out between several of the main roads / exits we have off the freeway but also plan for it with infrastructure (roads, utilities, drainage, etc).
92595 40-49 White
39 1.quaint
2.quiet
3.neighborly
1.need swimming place
2.need more Sheriff s
3.more fixing streets
1.more shops
2.more police
3.community parks
Need to be able to swim in our city! Been here in Wildomar for 45 years, beautiful city! 92595 60-69 White 40 1.safety and security
2. Close proximity to
hospitals
3. Small city atmosphere
1. Growth
2. Industry
3. Maintain a low tax base
for homeowners
1.jobs jobs jobs
2. 3.
Slow growth 92595 70+ White
41 1.general rural area
2.convenient shopping
3. 1.traffic
2.bus service
3.excessive development
1.less building
2.more police presence
3.street maintenance
Better roads 92595 70+ White
42 1. Rural small-town feel
2. Affordable Housing
3. Close to nearby amenities
1.Crappy Street
Maintenance
2.Sellers Road
closed/excessive time
3.JMI selected contractor
for Bundy imp
1.parks
2.road cleaning/repairs
3.Sellers Road to Open
To keep the small-town feeling 92595 50-59 White
43 1.Not over populated
2. Family community
3. Have mountains
1. Streets many potholes
2.Not too many shopping:
3. Not too many
restaurants with great
foods
1. Smoother road
2. Safety/ security for
speeding/ tailgating
3. Better landscaping entry
way from freeway
More stores for revenues to improve community 50-59
44 1.affordable
2.small town feel
3. 1. lack of businesses
growth
2. Poor school district
3. Potholes
1. Shopping center
2. Parks/walking trails
3. A downtown or Main
Street area
A small town feel with parks, shopping, a Main Street, and walking trails 92595 30-39 Hispanic_or_Latino,White 45 1.close to temecula
2. 1 he from the beach
3. “Affordable” when we
moved here
1.no city municipalities
(road repair/street
sweeping)
2. Hoarders
3. Empty shopping centers
1.small businesses
2. Variety of stores
3. Enforced Parking
regulations
Beautification. So many people say they love the “ruralness” of Wildomar but to the outside eye it’s a dump. Hoarders on big plots, cars parked for weeks to months collecting dirt, deteriorating roads. Wildomar looks like it takes no pride in itself.
We have huge shopping centers left vacant while we keep cramming businesses off of Central in Elsinore.
Wildomar can keep is small community feel without looking like it’s taking in the unwanted of Orange County. I am proud to own my home, but I feel so many of my neighbors and the city don’t care to be proud of themselves. 92595 30-39 White
46 1. Quiet neighborhoods
2. Ability to do what you
want to your home.
3. Citizens being involved
1. Homeless people coming
in.
2. Weeds growing
everywhere
3. Not fixing things on time.
1. More activities for kids.
2. Park celebrations
3. Parks near bundy/seller.
I would love the city to offer more jobs, community activities, shops, parks for kids/dogs. 92595 30-39 Black_or_African_American,White 47 1. Quiet is appealing.
2. People are considerate.
3. Love business access.
1.Homelessness.
2. Street repairs needed.
3. Sewage access needed.
1. Community gatherings.
2. Elderly checkups.
3.Activities for teens.
Let's stay small town but with modern amenities. Access to the cities are a must, however, traffic is a real problem. We need to expand law enforcement. Fresh/clean water should be a right for all. A large community center would be a big improvement for the community.
92595 60-69 White
47 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 6 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
48 1.community
2.rural small town feel
3. A Good class if people
still live here
1.keeping the small town
feel & rural look
2. homeless/drug addicts
3 law enforcement
presence
1.less homelessness drug
addicts
2.more law enforcement
around
3.more trees/ nature
around the city
A rural small town feel still. House with bigger property. Not just a bunch of track homes close together with no back yards. Don’t make the city housing so cheap that the city starts attracting people with no sense of class. Trees and nature through out the city so it does not look nor feel like I’m living in a cement block. A tight community with activities for all ages and special needs.
92595 40-49 Hispanic_or_Latino
49 1.semi-rural areas with
animals plus
hospitals/shopping
2. Welcoming to ALL
3.peaceful west side
1. Affordable housing, incl.
mid & low income
2. Maintaining rural feel
3. Traffic that comes with
growth
1. More walking paths (like
on Grand)
2. Green spaces/parks
3. Restaurants that aren’t
all fast food
Sufficient services and safe walking paths that allow people, pets, and horses to get around town without always having to drive would be nice. A sense of being at home, peaceful with lots of open space and green areas yet important services are nearby.
92595 70+ White
50 1. Great neighbors.
2. Country feel
3. Love the weather
1. Growth
2. abstract planning
3. Traffic increase
1. Police
2. Code Enforcement
3. Street repairs
Slow controlled growth, more community programs for our youth & elderly with a focus on diversity. A need for more city parks, and engage in more special events to draw attention and increase revenue for our local business creating a warm memorable hometown environment.
92595 70+ White
51 1.Family
2.Small Town
3.Location
1. Infrastructure
2. Lack of Good Schools
3. Lack of Tourism
Attractions
1. Tourism
2. Entertainment
3. Zoning that
supports/attracts
businesses.
School districts need to be at the same levels as Temecula and Murrieta. A large area designated for business/industrial parks will attract more business coming into Wildomar (similar to the large business stretch on Jefferson Ave in Murrieta).
Infrastructure that supports tourism and attractions.
A Cal State University.
92595 30-39 Hispanic_or_Latino
52 1. Smaller Community
2.Close to everything
3. 1. Ongoing growth
2.Traffic
3. 1. Better parks for kids
2.Water and restrooms in
all parks
3. Ongoing community imput and consistant growth for community. 92595 70+ White 53 1.rural atmosphere
2.small town living
3. 1.remain small but prosper
2. 3.
1. 2.
3. My vision would not include the fuel station that is proposed at the I-15 Wildomar Trail location. Having big rig’s congregating in that area will lead to both air and noise pollution that will greatly affect those Windsong Valley residents whose property backs up to that area. We do not need a truck stop in our backyard. This is not what we anticipated when we bought in this wonderful rural town.
92595 70+ Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac
es/
54 1. It has a developing but
still grounded cowboy
culture.
2. 3.
1. Crime and negative
outside changes.
2. 3.
1. Embrace our cowboy
and rancher roots
2. Encouragement of gun
ownership including
concealed carry
3. A peaceful and safe community of aspiring ideas and businesses but set in the backdrop culture and environment of our cowboy and rancher past. This can easily be accomplished by encouraging more gun ownership, social events with police, organic farm to table farmers markets, opening of gun ranges to teach proper gun safety, and the adoption of laissez faire politics to keep our community free of government overreach. 92595 30-39 other
55 1. Not a lot of city rules
2. It hasn't turned into Lake
Elsinore
3. Not pretentious like
Murrieta
1. Crime
2. Too much politics and
government involvement in
our lives.
3. Saving our cultural past.
1. Farmers markets
2. Gun shops and shooting
ranges
3. Encouragement of local
farming including bee hives.
A community that doesn't embrace the woke ideology that turns everything to crap. Please don't allow marijuana shops in our town. It attracts the bad element. We should have more citizens carrying guns to keep us safe. Police are too late in responding and as the last two school shootings proved, the police don't engage shooters. Only residence can keep the criminal element out of our town. We should have more local farming. DeJongs Dairy Farm is a perfect example of what our town needs more of. What a local blessing DeJongs provided during the pandemic when you couldn't get eggs or milk at the grocery stores but it was produced locally in our great little town and provided much needed milk and eggs. We need more dairies, farms, local meat production like cow ranches and bee hives. 40-49 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac
es/
56 1.rural
2.community
3.wildlife
1.too many car washes
2.grocery needed off
Palomar
3.housing planning a
disaster
1.building continuity
2.more park land
3.public road landscaping
as in Murrieta
Need lots of improvement to beautify Wildomar Landscaping, building design, parks, road improvements 92595 70+ White 57 1.proximity to other cities
2. 3.
1.infrastructure
2.retail development
(bundy canyon area)
3. 1.businesses
2.parks
3.community
A place to grow a family without having to travel to neighboring cities for necessities. 92595 30-39 Hispanic_or_Latino 48 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 7 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
58 1.Small community
2.Somewhat rural feel
3.Low rate of serious crimes
1.Growing traffic + poorly
timed lights
2.Deteriorating
infrastructure (roads,
power, etc)
3.Handling growth
1.Parks
2.Small businesses
3.Updated/repaired
infrastructure
When my family moved here in 2020, Wildomar was a small, friendly community. I understand that growth is necessary for any city, and that state/county require certain amounts of high-density housing, but I feel like Wildomar should hold to the minimums in that regard.
Also, being small business-friendly would attract a broader tax base and bring in diverse retail and services. We could possibly create a unique shopping opportunity for locals and visitors to compete with Temecula Old Town. 92595 60-69 White
59 1.rural
2.quiet
3.soothing infrastructure
1.urbanization
2.too many people
3.not enough
1.country
2.community
3.respect for others
We want Wildomar to remain a large,y rural community 70+ White 60 1. Rural/country feel
2. Family oriented
3. Community
1. Traffic/Dangerous roads:
Bundy Canyon
2. Traffic lights
3. Some communities lack
public transportation
1. Traffic lights on Bundy
Canyon Road.
2. Public transportation
3. Own police force.
Wildomar should continue to have the country feel. It is one of the biggest reasons a lot of families including my own moved here. I would like to see more public transportation too. This would help my daughter who is going to MSJC who doesn't own a car yet, tremendously. We need more community events for all. Maybe a community center where recreational classes can be held. Maybe expand our community library too. It can be the extension of a community center for all ages.
My family and I like going to the Marna O'Brien park. I don't know if there could be another closer to the east of Wildomar?
I would like to see major improvement on Bundy Canyon. My family and I have been living in the Farm Community for the past 17 years. We have heard and seen so many accidents happen on this road. It is especially dangerous at night! It is really dark. Dogs get lose and ran over. Drivers do not slow down...not even at night. 92595 50-59 Hispanic_or_Latino
61 1. Farm life
2. The views /although we
are losing them
3. When it was quiet with
no construction or traffic.
1. Kaiser building going in
2. new gas stations
3. homeless and drugs
coming in. Schools with
agendas
1. Police
2. Farm life
3. Farmers markets
No more gas stations. More houses with more property so people can have live stock and gardens. Stop placing houses so close together. 92595 40-49 White
62 1.community
2.neighborhood unity
3.expansive area
1.overcrowding
2.business zoning
3.roadwork improvement
1.community events
2.neighborhood watch
3.traffic control maintain,
rural feel while monitoring
and growth
Moderate business growth for the well being of the city while offering improvement to the landscape and infrastructure 92595 50-59 Hispanic_or_Latino 63 1.open spaces
2.quiet neighborhood
3.lack of surface street
traffic
1.over development
2.lack of infrastructure
3.increased property crimes
1neighborhood police
presence
2. organized parks and rec
programs
3neighborhood
beautification incentives
More organized recreation opportunities, improved infrastructure, improvement/cleanup of blighted areas, increased night patrols by police 92595 60-69 White
64 1.Not overpopulated
2.View of sunset over the
Ortega
3.Tons to do!
1.low income housing
2.meth
3.crappy roads
1.trees and landscape
2.restaurants & movie
theatre
3.community fun!
Stop building! Too many cookie cutter ugly apartments. Unless it’s a community pool(s) park, bbq’s, water park for kids with sun shades and misters! It’s sooo hot here- and clean up the Lake! Nothing should be that colour! 92531 50-59 White 65 1.The country feel to the
city.
2.Friendly people.
3.Shopping and doctors are
close.
1.Growing homeless
population
2. Water shortage
3. drugs off the streets
1.Upkeep on roads
2.parks and walking trails
3.paved streets and
sidewalks
Hopefully Wildomar keeps a small town feel while improving roads. A few parks would be nice. Open areas for wildlife. I grew up in California and just moved to Wildomar for the openness and country feel. 92595 60-69 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac es/
49 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 8 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
66 1.rural
2.space
3.small
1.building
2. Small lots
3.traffic
1. Open space
2. Homes on 1/2 to 2 acre
lots
3. More rural
So many times you lose the value of your property because the city becomes a nightmare like Temecula. The reason Wildomar is special is because it's more rural and it will just be like any other town that blends into lake Elsinore and Temecula and it will lose its value if we lose our space and our rural element... Homes should be on Big lots and more of a farm feel which translates to privacy and hence more value. 92595 60-69 White
67 1.Preservation of our
historic past
2.It still feels like a small
town
3. 1. Lack of gun rights
2. Too many building
restrictions
3. Crime
1. More freedom
2. More local fresh produce
and meat sources
3. More community
education on how to thrive
Lets face it. We are on the precipice of a recession and most likely a historic depression with continual food inflation. We as a community need to become self sustaining to weather any future calamities like more inflation, pandemics, economic turmoil. The citizens of our community need to be encouraged to start family back yard farming. We need more local gardening/farming.
40-49 White
68 1.everything
2. 3.
1.Paving dirt roads
2.stop blocking roads to get
to your home ( Westly and
Palomar Rd)
3. 1.Dirt Roads Paved
2. 3.
More sport parks for the Kids 92595 70+ White
69 1.small town feel
2.horses
3.less crowded than
murrieta and temecula
1.reducing lot sizes for
higher density
2. traffic
3.horses to safely move
around the traffic
1.keep it rural
2.maintaining horse trails
3.put up signals versus stop
signs when traffic becomes
dangerous
Go back to what we all bought into this city for. Keep it small town rural. Give us a street like old town murrieta so we can spend our money in our own city. 92595 40-49 White
70 1.Rural atmosphere.
2.Stores for shopping and
restaurants. But not to
close.
3.Police respond fast.
1.Slum looking housing.
2.Roads
3.Parking for cars.
1.Speed bumps.
2.More stop signs.
3.More police .
Start HOAs in places that have slum looking houses on the blocks of the homes that were built in the early 90s. To many families living in a single family home. To many cars blocking the side walks. 92595 70+ White 71 1.size
2.cleaniness
3.affortability
1. smoothRoads!!!
2.sidewalk connectivity
3.speeders!!
1. code enforcement on
empty fields and their
fences
2.traffic enforcement!!!
3. again, enforce
deweeding.
I would like to see Wildomar stay about the same size. I would love to see more traffic enforcement but just not with speeders or rolling stops but with littering and graffiti. Pretty much anything that is offensive on a daily drive. Keep what we have but make it much better. Connect the sidewalks so people can walk uninhibited. Bike lanes!!! A couple more parks but not everywhere. Install cameras (like London) then change the laws so it's easier to prosecute. 😂😂 92595 60-69 White
72 1. It seems safe
2. It seems clean
3. 1. Not enough for older
kids to do
2. Places for families
3. Not enough community
parks, pools, amenities
1. Parks that are enjoyable
for families
2. Community spaces
3. Community/family events
Growth that includes well thought out communities with amenities, particularly for families, kids, and young adults.
Leaving the city to work is almost a given, but to leave for any recreation is not a healthy city. It breeds unhealthy and unsafe activities when kids have nowhere to go. Cultural, creative, and fun spaces and events for families will attract quality residents as well as we grow. Thinking libraries with Makers Spaces; technology & robotics clubs/training, arts, crafts, pools, live theatre, culture, an attractive walkable "downtown", museums... 92595 40-49 White
73 1.small town
2.conservative community
3.quiet
1.too much building/
lacking infrastructure
2.communityfacilities ie
aquatic center & parks
3. Apartments
1. Aquatic center
2.parks
3. Sidewalks
To keep the small town feel, conservative values, family oriented community sites i.e. aquatic center and parks and perhaps Wildomar can get its own high school. Less apartments less building in general. Hire more city employees perhaps work on Friday so that people who actually work have options. 92595 40-49 Hispanic_or_Latino
74 1. Family orientated
2. Has a small town feel
3. 1. Growth-we need more
businesses/attractions
2. Crime (we need our own
police station)
3. Businesses
1. Attractions
Winery/Brewery w/water
slide or prk
2.Cmmty- Sprts Prk/Prk
w/a pool
3.Voter Integrity
Start utilizing our hills! Get a Winery/Brewery going to start making Wildomar more self sufficient. No more houses, there are many different business that we can get contractors for, we have way too many houses and not enough attractions/businesses. Stop focusing on things that can bring revenue to Wildomar. Get out from underneath other Cities (like Murrieta) and reclaim what has been taken from us. Focus on community, a community center in a sports park that also has a public pool. We could charge NON residents to swim in our pool plus have a "Summer" Snack Bar/Grill. I know we have Marna O'Brien but from what I've been told there's not much more we can do with that Park.
Lets get small Businesses back up and running and become more local/small Business sufficient. Some business ideas for Wildomar: Winery/Brewery w/a waterpark and water slide, Waterpark, Drive In Movie Theater, Skating Rink, (Ice in Winter/Roller in Summer) TRADER JOES, Trampoline Park, Equestrian Center. 92595 60-69 other
50 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 9 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
75 1. More rural than
surrounding areas
(Murrieta, etc)
2. Small town vibe
3. Less development
1. Traffic
2. Retaining small town feel
3. Overdevelopment
1. Community activities
2. Services such as street
sweeping done REGULARLY
3. More parks/open spaces
To see the city grow with a well thought out plan; development seems haphazard and not well considered. More open spaces/greenbelt areas/parks rather than filling up every empty space with densely packed housing developments and large commercial enterprises. To keep small town feel and not choke out rural atmosphere by overdeveloping. 76 1.Semi Rural
2.Proximity to Nature
3.Low Population
1.Rising Crime
2.Poor Road Maintenance
3.Water & Trash Costs
1. Restaurants
2. Ice Skating Rink
3. Public Pool
1.Non-corporate businesses
2.Routine Litter Pickup & Enforced Littering fines-currently $1000. in some very clean cities
3.Small starter/retirement homes; tiny home village; dublexes & triplexes instead of mini mansions
4.High revenue business with ample parking & traffic flow 92595 50-59 White
77 1.nature
2.activities
3.hikes
1. 2. Lack os stores
3. 1.groceries
2. 3.stores
More stores 92595 30-39 White
78 1. Rural feeling
2. Beautiful valley scenery
3. Access to all shopping
needs
1. Over building
2. Over population
3. Traffic
1. Police presence
2. Street maintenance
3. Community activities
Keeping the rural feeling. Controlling the over building and keeping down the population. 92595 60-69 White 79 1. Small Town feel.
2. Proximity of amenities.
3. Easy to get on and off
freeway.
1.Water, push for
desalinization plant.
2. Over populating
community.
3. Road and driving hazards
increase.
1. Mega indoor
recreational community
center 500 to 1000
captivity.
2. Restrict building
3. Sports programs
I envision Wildomar to be the leader in technology and aerospace engineering. We can create jobs where we live by reaching out to companies and provide the work space right here at home.
Secondly let us take a hard look and at Natural resources. Food, water, and power are in high demand. Preparing for the future, requires a detailed plan for success. Support local farming, and encourage home grown food. Encourage drought tolerate plants in our neighborhoods. Create more community events so families can enjoy our town.
Furthermore, we need to mitigate risk to the community, implement risk management procedures through a risk assessment. Log hazards and implement controls. Roads need to be assessed for drivability, proper drainage, and correct asphalt or concrete mix applications. Signage and street name changes should be requested through the county of Riverside.
Lastly, our children are our most important resource, we need to keep these future leaders educated and engaged. 92595 40-49 White
80 1.away from the city
2.decent shopping
3.great neighbors
1.crime
2.homeless
3.road construction
1.police
2.restaurants
3.traffic lights
Since we’re in a drought how about stop building more housing. 92595 60-69 White 81 1.country like
2.less populated
3.houses with acreage for
horses
1.crime
2.unemployment
3.illegal drugs
1.police
2.community patrols
3.decreased crime
If continues at current path,a lot of us will MOVE!! 92595 60-69 White 82 1. rural feel but close to
grocery stores, hwy
2. Not as busy as Temecula
3. Not too many homeless
1.shopping options (target)
. prefer to pay taxes
towards wildomar
2. Community evens
3. School ratings
1.local shopping
2.upkept streets
3.city events with more
participation
I see Wildomar as a place for families to live and enjoy it, not so much a tourist destination like Temecula. It would be nice to provide activities for local families including parks, activities, with city hosted events. More mom and pop restaurants would be great.
30-39 Asian
83 1.not over built like
Temecula and Murrieta
2.still somewhat rural
3.open spaces green areas
1.sales tax revenue
2.traffic
3.law enforcement staffing
1.more cops
2.more restaurants
3.more single family homes
and less apartments
Keep the rural feeling of the city by not building on every piece of open space. More cops on the street to do targeted Enform like transients, package theft etc. 92595 50-59 White 84 1.Country Feel
2.Open Spaces
3.Convenient Shopping
1.Traffic
2.Low Income Housing
3. 1.Hiking Trails
2. 3.
I don't have a vision right now 92595 70+ White
51 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 10 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
85 1. Our People!
2. Small town feel
3. Room to breathe
1. Tax money to necessities
2. Large low income
housing invading
3. Road paving needed
1. Street sweeping
2. Police
3. Farmers market
Stay with the small town feel while slowly growing with companies/businesses/stores that will generate more revenue for the city. 92595 60-69 White
86 1.the weather
2.close to hospitals
3.friendly residents and
neighbors
1.development
2.drought
3.potential fires/floods
1. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO
SHOPS
2.sidewalks
3.police
A great place to raise a family or retire. Not only great, but safe. 92595 60-69 White 87 1. Small town feel
2.growing
3.easy access
1.growth
2.tolerance
3.diversity
1.community events
2.education about diversity
3.home growth
To create a community that is diverse and respectful of all its citizens regardless or race, gender or sexual orientation. 91595 40-49 Hispanic_or_Latino 88 1.Less housing
2. 3.
1.Bundy Canyon Road
2. 3.
1.Restriction on housing
2. 3.
More open space 92595 70+ White
89 1.quiet at night
2.scenic views of
mountains
3.horse trail on Grand Av.
1.Tre Logos Development
2.development along
Clinton Keith
3.Drivers doing rolling
stops at stop signs
1. More OPEN SPACES
2.limit on fast food facilities
3.a Whole Foods store
I would like have Wildomar remain a small community with a smaller scaled development for subsidized housing. Also, this community should not allow the establishment of warehouses. Most of all we need a community center with a large park surrounding it.
92595 70+ Black_or_African_American
90 1. Small
2. Town
3. Living
1. The City is selling us out
2. The project proposal by
Staters
3. Crime in the rise
1. More police patrol
2. Parking for the
businesses
3. Stop low income/ halfway house project. If you must sell us out, please consider the infrastructure that is needed to support it. 92595 40-49 White
91 1.community
2.quaint rural vibe
3.general friendliness
1. Excessive growth
2. Poor (or delayed)
structural/engineering
3. Traffic
1. Pedestrian paths
2. Community support
decreased vehicle traffic
3. Local companies (job
opportunities)
Keep the quaint esthetics of the area with growth with businesses, while increasing pedestrian and bicycle traffic and decreased vehicle traffic. 92595 50-59 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac es/
92 1. Affordable
2. Rural
3. Close knit
1. Crime (thanks to the
governor)
2. Homeless (thanks to the
governor)
3. Lack of entertainment
1. More reduction in crime
2. Cleaner streets
3. Local entertainment
A nice rural town with clean streets, little crime, and a place to take the kids for a fun night out. 92595 40-49 White 93 1. Country vibe
2. Quiet nights
3. Less traffic
4. Friendly people
5. Open spaces
1. Stop the urbanization
2. Stop building the "burbs"
EVERYWHERE!
3. Providing water, electric,
internet
1. Open spaces
2. Less housing tracts being
built
3. More Farmer Markets
along the open
roads/highways
For Wildomar to retain the open country feeling it has, that's why I moved here. Stop trying to compete with the BIG city's.... People that want the BIG city aren't going to be moving to Wildomar as long as it retains it homey, country feeling.... I love the peacefulness Wildomar offers! That's the best part of Wildomar. Small town living not far from the BIG city if you want to venture out into it.
92595 60-69 White
94 1. small town feel
2. open space
3. quiet
1. over development
2. traffic
3. homelessness and crime
1. slow down development
2. street repairs
3. more responsive police
department
Keeping the small town "country" feel. Increased police force, including traffic enforcement. 92595 50-59 White 95 1.country feel, foothills
2.the trees, vegetation,
3. Just close enough to
stores
1. Growth, too many
housing developments
2. traffic & noise of it
3. Lack of safety
1. Street maintenance
2. Bike trails, lanes
3. Country store with local
produce, etc
All of the above.
Keep it as is, but clean it up. Prune trees, not remove. Keep the country feel. 52 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 11 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
96 1. Rural
2. Friendly
3. Small Town feel
1. Bundy Canyon traffic and
road is horrible.
2. Most roads need repair.
3. Need street sweepers
1. Sidewalks Street lamps
2. Planting of drought
resistant plants and clean
up of freeway.
More law inforement visibility. 92595 70+
97 1.Small community
2. Has family-owned
businesses
3. Generally a quiet place
to live
1.Expensive Electricity
2. Known as a fire hazard
area by home insurance
agents
3. Lack of diverse jobs
1. Department store
2. Local entertainment
3. Expanded resources for
the community
It would be nice to see a shaded park for family picnics on the east side of the I-15. More community events would be nice, such as farmers markets, educational events, job fairs or entertainment events. 92595 30-39 Hispanic_or_Latino 98 1.Rural yet suburban
2. Safe neighborhoods
3. Great place to raise kids
1. Growth of businesses
without infrastructure
support
2. Homeless
3. Increase in crime - need
more patrols
1. Police patrols
2. Information dispersed
3. City activities
Growth with enough infrastructure built to support the growth. Parks and open spaces. Do not want the proposed build in Windsong Valley which will increase crime and lower our property values 92595 50-59 White 99 1. Ample shopping and
stores
2. Close to OC, SD, and
Riverside
3. 1. Crime from Lake
Elsinore.
2. Recession/Depression
that will impact local
economy
3. 1. Joint police and citizen
anti crime events
2. Farmers markets
3. Workshops for self
sustained living
A mecca of community self sustainability.
100
1.Nice retail corridor along
Clinton Keith
2.Some walking trails
3. 1.Crime
2.Run down properties
3.Lack of mobility
1.Diverse retail/business
2.City wide mobility
3.Better city planning
utilizing new general plan
Balanced growth of housing /businesses 92595 50-59 White 101
1.small
2.private
3.proximity to larger cities
1.overcrowding
2.traffic
3.crime
1. Clear zones for industries
and housing
2. More parks, and trees
3. Less construction
Its nice that Wildomar isn’t completely built out, we don't need a building on every lot, we need open spaces, trees and walking trails. The traffic is getting bad because these communities were not built for so many people. Grow wisely not quickly.
92595 30-39 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac
es/
102
1.freeway close
2.lower cost of housing
3.centrally located
1.drugs
2.lack of jobs
3.homelessness
1.police
2.opportunities for
homeless/jobless
3.more code enforcement
clean it up! Terrible drug and crime problems in Wildomar. Also, need better code enforcement in some of the 'older' neiborhoods 40-49 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac
es/
103
1. Wildomar still feels like a
small town which is great
2. City planning seems to
be strategic
3. 1. Too many regulations
and rules
2. Illegal immigration
3. Real Estate prices
1. Less homes, more
farming
2. Horse trails
3. embracing of our core values as a community such as farming, raising horses and protecting our 2nd amendment. 40-49 104
community involvement
2.open space
3.country look and feel.
1.Hiking Trails
2.Safe bike routes
3.Over growth impacting
our roadways.
Community Center for kids
and adults
2. Community Swimming
pool.
3.Community garden
Safe activities for teenagers and Interaction with teens and adults.
Older adults sharing their skills with our youth in our community 92595 70+ White 105
1. Indoor Shooting Range
2. When break ground
3. Love my Neighborhood
1. 2.
3. 1.
2. 3.
To have it's own Indoor Shooting Range 92595 70+ White
53 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 12 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
106
1.Rural feel
2. Close to cities
3. Low crime
1.Traffic increase (Clinton
Keith Rd.
2. Existing roads
maintenance
3. Oodles of dirt roads in
parts of town
1. Public plunge
2. Traffic enforcement
3. Indoor recreation
Entertainment and recreation center surrounded by open foothill views 92595 70+ Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac es/
107
1.small town atmosphere
2.mixed housing
opportunities
3. 1.road repair
2.tax income opportunities
3.crime and homelessness
1.more police presence
2.more parks
3.more working
opportunities
Maintain historically significant items (buildings, bell, etc.) while growing the city with retail and commercial areas. Keep our ranches and large lots and our open areas as much as possible. We also need the college to be built and a large park with ball diamonds, football fields and basketball courts. How about a community swimming pool. Just a fe2 ideas! 92595 70+ White
108
1. Small rural town feel
2. Not too busy
3. Less traffic
1. Homeless encampments
2. Road damage/disrepair
3. 1. More open space
2. Parks
3. Better roads and walking
paths
Small rural town 92595 50-59
109
1. small town feel
2. adequate grocery
shopping available
3. an attempt to keep
residents involved
1. businesses detrimental
to Wildomar's reputation
are being allowed
2. traffic at major
intersections
3. 1. rope-lined paths (like
along Grand)
2. police presence
3. higher end restaurants
Upgrading allowed businesses/ no more cannabis, dollar stores, similar. Businesses that provide higher paying jobs. A community center for large meetings, facilities and resources for seniors, make undeveloped lots on Clinton Keith open spaces/parks, instead of fast food businesses that only bring more traffic. A plan for aesthetic improvement around the Inland Valley medical center/Clinton Keith intersection. Fix the **** roads. Area around the post office needs to be improved visually. Better communication with the residents; I know you send out the mayor's message and invite people to meetings, but we hear nothing about what is being discussed or decided. A well organized volunteer organization. Organized sports for seniors; i.e., morning/evening walk, senior stretch classes, etc., at Marna O'Brien park. The city is just not very pedestrian friendly.
92562 60-69 White
110
1. Mom & Pop businesses
2. Rural spaces for horse
ownership/livestock
3. Helpful library personnel
1. Growing too fast, school
district lines will need to be
redrawn
2. Increasing traffic
3. Taxes
1. Services: veterinarian,
VA, home improvement,
etc.
2. SCHOOLS
3. Improved streets
NO MORE BUILDING. Wildomar is not Temecula. It's not Murrieta. We don't have nor want the infrastructure in place for that kind of growth. Most of us were attracted to this area because it was open and undeveloped and still within a few minutes of necessities. The traffic and constant growth isn't sustainable and it's tainted the charm of the area. 30-39
111
1.open land
2.like minded individuals
3.farming
1.increased laws and
regulations
2.illegal immigration
3.water supply
1.more farmers
2.horse trails
3.tractor supply store
A place where we can keep open land and be self sufficient. 40-49 White 112
1.small feel
2. Quiet
3.not far from stores
1.things to do for teenagers
2.bikability/ walkability
3.keeping quiet small feel
1.mini/ glow put
2.work programs for young
3. A nice community for families of all ages. With lots of activities for all ages. Abilities for teenagers to work, not just fast food.
Being able to bike or walk to nice parks and/or local owned establishments 92595 40-49 White
113
1. Location
2. Weather
3. Community
1. Traffic
2. Schools need better
scoring
3. High density housing is
not the answer for either
1. Fireworks
2. Family neighborhoods
3. Parks-I know some are
on the books
Dont make the mistakes Temecula did, and Murrieta is currently on the verge of… Growth is great, and needed, but dont block main access arteries without the proper additions for egress. 92595 30-39 White 114
1. Events, Eateries, Family
owned businesses
2. People I've met since I
moved here.
3. Outdoor Activities
1.Traffic, to many
speedsters
2.Developement - stop
building houses.
3. Noise Ord., Vandels, etc
1. More affordable Venue's
2. Safer streets for cyclers,
walkers, horses & riders
3. Safer neighborhood's
If I see it in my lifetime. Pretty much what we have already discribed in the 2040 update. Our streets need to become alot safer, easier commuting throughout our 3 cities, more available & affordable transportation with in our 3 cities.
Stop taking away OUR open space!! When I moved here in 2014/2015 it reminded me of the small city I moved away from, we are now turning into yet another large city that will eventually be over run by gangs we don't need or want. I love my little town and would like to see it not get way overgrown. There's enough empty homes to fill we don't need anymore that will sit empty and clutter our area. Enough said . So now to test you??? How many of you actually take the time to read my comments or any of the other comments that we sent in. 60-69 White
54 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 13 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
115
1. Neighbors helping
Neighbors
2. Community Service
3. A couple of very involved
Councilpersons
1. Growth needs to attract
higher level job opp.
2. Too many Car washes &
cannabis shops
3. Road conditions
1. Better Roads
2. Entertainment
3. Parks & Recreation
Department
A major thing I would like to see is a serious Parks and Recreation department like Murrieta or Lake Elsinore. Residents currently can attend classes, sports etc. out of our city at a non-resident rate but it’s time Wildomar has their own! Wildomar is in major need of Entertainment such as a theatre, splash pad, ice rink (this would draw so many kids/adults in for Hockey, ice skating lessons, public skating, broom ball, birthday parties, etc. currently everyone in Murrieta, LE, Temecula etc has to drive to Riverside or further and we do it and those cities benefit. Get it here before one of our neighboring cities gets one!
92595 50-59 other
116
1. The wonderful
community
2. The location
3. It's small town rural feel
1. Funding
2. Crime/lack of law
enforcement
3. Bringing in positive
economic development
1. A downtown
2. Recreational
activities/programs
through parks & rec
3. A Sportspark &
Community Center
In my vision for the future of Wildomar I see it having a beautifully designed, designated downtown space filled with shops and restaurants. There will be live music and farmers markets and Santa during the holidays where the community can gather and enjoy. There will be positive growth and expansion including new and upgraded schools, but the city will still maintain its rural, country feel. There will be more green spaces, less empty dirt lots. There will be a Sportspark, a Community Center, and there will be programs and activities offered through Parks and Rec that the citizens of Wildomar can take advantage of. Finally, my vision of Wildomar includes it developing something that makes it stand out and sets it apart from neighboring cities. Something like a rodeo that fits it rural feel but is not offered elsewhere. 92595 30-39 White
117
1. Ruralness of area
2. Family friendly
3. Independent business
owner support
1. Traffic control
2. Road surface updates
3. Slow business growth
1. Tighter measures on
auto storage in residential
areas
2. Sidewalk additions
3. Increase in green areas
City council members who support the general plan and show community involvement 92595 60-69 Hispanic_or_Latino 118
1. Quiet Community
2. Small Community
3. Still Growing
1. Traffic on two-lane
streets
2. Large trucks on two-lane
streets
3. More revenue for the city
1. More businesses
2. More participation by
younger residents
3. My vision for Wildomar is to see the city continue to grow into it's own and to be true to what Wildomar is about. 92595 50-59 Black_or_African_American 119
1.small town
2.still has open spaces
3. 1.increase school rankings
2.improve all street
maintenance
3.More Youth activities
1. Sports Park E of the 15 as
was planned many years
ago.
2 Main Street where you
can walk, shop and eat
3. Beautify the main thoroughfares. Plan for a small town Main Street with upscale shops, easy free parking, pleasant walking/resting areas and unique eateries, nice restaurants and bakeries. Why fight traffic to go to Temecula, stay in town for a night out. No more storage development. Deter crime with visual presence of police officers patrolling all over town any time of day.
60-69
120
1.Rural
2. Not far from SD or LA
3. Very close to my work
1.leadership doesn’t care
for residents
2. Those running our city
are OVERPAID
3.very close to Lake Elsinore
1.Designated Sheriff patrol
2. Child Development
Centers
3. Things for kids, &
preteens to do(youth
center)
We need less car washes, more non-chain restaurants, and more social workers/mental health support for the Homeless that WALK up/down Catt rd all day long. Wildomar has NOTHING for students to do when school is out. There are no tennis or pickle ball courts for residents recreation. Keep the rural parts rural, and keep out the investors looking to place businesses that we don’t need (who needs ANOTHER carwash when Clinton Keith has 5 in a matter of BLOCKS??) 92595 40-49 White
121
1. My neighbors
2. Close but far enough
away from stores
3. Freeway is close for
commute
1. Updating infrastructure
2. Shortcomings of civil
engineering
3. Keeping contractors on
task
1. Shooting range
2. Smooth roads
3. Bundy Canyon/Sellers
opening up!
Additional fire and police station
Small scale dog parks
Less housing construction
92595 40-49 Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac
es/
122
1.more affordable homes
2.larger home lots allow
space from neighbors
3.growing shopping &
restaurants
1.infrastructure: roads
cracked, torn
2.growing homeless
population
3.balancing growth, rural
benefits
1.noise ordinance (loud
neighbors)
2.improve roads, sidewalks
to residential streets
3. homeless issues
I live in Northern Wildomar on a .8 acre property. Do NOT want area near me to change zoning and suddenly have apartments or multiple homes on lots--want to keep the rural nature. At same time, improvements to roads, adding sidewalks, and other help for making the neighborhood nicer would be great. I want growth for some shopping and restaurant options but not at sacrifice of quiet, larger lot 92595 50-59 White
55 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 14 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
123
1. 2.
3. Streets need repairs 1.
2.Streets need repairs
3.streets need repairs
1. Repair the streets
2. 3.
Nice roads less housing and traffic 92595 60-69 White
124
1.calm, relaxing
environment
2. Home prices More bang
for your buck
3.palomar shopping center!
1. Fwy Traffic
2. Not many Fwy On & off
ramp
3. Pot holes
1. Walking trails (palomar
example)
2. 3.
I love it Wildomar as is not much change needed.. 92595 40-49 American_Indian_and_Alaska_Nat i
125
1.Laid back
2.Family-oriented
3.Safer than some
surrounding areas
1.Crime/Homeless
2.Corporate development
3.Building too much in
small spaces, feeling
cramped
1.Planned community
2.Infrastructure like better
roads
3.Community center with
indoor gym
To have no smoker/drug shops esp. next to schools. To not be crammed in. To be smart in what and where business are allowed to build, and making sure infrastructure is in place before building new residential communities. To have a beautiful community with open roads that have sidewalks, trees, and nice fencing. I think Wildomar residents would like to keep our more rural feel while still having access to good schools, and safe uncrowded places to eat, shop and live. Make sure that new construction/businesses makes sense based on where residents currently live and space available - it should not be so disruptive to our daily lives or make us feel so overcrowded, so that we want to move away. Many of us moved here to get away from the overcrowded crammed in feeling. It should not take such a long time to drive only a few miles in our community.
92595 50-59 White
126
1.rural feel
2.small town feel
3.local run businesses
1.general infrastructure
2.well planned downtown
area
3.lack of opportunities for
children and seniors
1.community center
building / senior center
2. historical society
3.preservation of
community heritage
Less urban sprawl and strip malls
More concise zoning
Focus on community heritage and history
Place for families can learn and grow together and feel supported by their community 92595 40-49 White
127
1. Patriotic
2. History
3. Safety
1. Liberalism
2. Change
3. Indoctrination
1. CCW citizens
2. Cops
3. Fix roads
Same as her neighbor Murrieta. Be patriotic and stay patriotic. No room for indoctrination like city of Temecula. 92595 30-39 Hispanic_or_Latino 128
1. Small town feel
2. 3.
1. Activities for young
people
2. Senior Center
3. 1. See above
2. 3.
Small town but activities for all in our community. 92595 60-69 other 129
1.The Ranch/Craftsman
Style homes.
2.The multi-purpose trails.
3.The positive energy for
Parks and events.
1. The lack of new voices
on City Council.
2. Industrial job growth.
3. Additional parkland
availability.
1. Industry
2. Multi-purpose Trails
3. Road Repairs
A well maintained community with nice smooth roads, plenty of parks and trails and a high quality industrial manufacturing sector.
I also believe we should have a high school with either the name of the city, or of a beloved person from the past, not a neighboring city's name. Elsinore lost the right to keep the name of the school when they dropped Wildomar from their sphere of influence.
I would like the City to openly push on the County to create a Regional Park where they had initially planned to. The college won't need that property, and has yet to purchase it. It was purchased to be a Regional Park with horse trails and a rodeo area and that would be a good fit here.
92595 60-69 White
130
1. It’s home, been here
since ‘85
2.?
3. DeJongs Chocolate Milk
1.City allowing builders to
close roadways with no
repercussions if they pass
deadlines.
2. 3.
1.City Hall working on
Friday.
2.Creating a parks & rec
program for kids
3. More visibility into top
issues
. 92595 30-39 other
131
1. Small town feel
2. A little less traffic
congestion
3. Slower pace
1. Too much housing being
planned
2. In need of a variety of
good restaurants
3. More parks
1. Open spaces/ green
belts/good parks
2. Trees!!
3. Community spaces with
quaint shops and open
areas
Keep the small town feel, add more green spaces keep businesses in business district not neighborhoods. Keep new housing to a minimum and make it single family not high density. 92595 50-59 132
1. Home town feel
2. Proximity to the freeway
3. Potential to grow
1. Available land
2. No real "place to go" =
i.e. downtown
3. Have to go elsewhere for
entertainment
1. Parks / Amenities
2. Job opportunities
3. Niche Businesses
(different from other cities)
A vibrant destination with rural roots and practical growth 92595 30-39 White 56 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 15 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
133
1.small town feel
2.not overly crowded
3.proximity to other larger
cities
1. Some roadways are
outdated
2. School system under
performing
3. 1. Police Services
2. Community events
3. Improved parks and commerce (grocery stores) etc. 92595 30-39 134
1.We know our neighbors
2 City council meetings are
easy to attend
.
3.We know our city
representatives
1. We legalized marijuana
in our city
2. Because of Sacramento,
we are short of funding the
city expected
3. 1.Candidate debates for
city council and school
board
2. 3.
Family values, family friendly 92595 60-69
135
1. semi-rural nature of the
community
2.mountain views
3. convenient shopping
opportunities
1. infrastructure
2. road maintenance (more
frequent, please)
3. density of residential
new construction
1. Fix this darned survey--
can't input
2. more consistent road
maint
3. police presence to deter
crime
Looking forward to seeing the medical complex build-out on Wildomar Trail. Surveys that aren't limited to 100 characters per field--ridiculous! 92595 60-69 White
136
1. The rural areas.
2. Close to my parents.
3. I’m close to my kids’
school, I love their school.
1.DRUGS
2. Police response time
3.homeless
1.we NEED police presence
2. Help with the
DAILY/NIGHTLY theft
3. Actual help when citizens
have an issue.
I’d love to see Wildomar slow down. Less building, more taking care of what we already have! Stop building parks until we get the druggies out of the ones we have. Keep the history of Wildomar alive. Wildomar needs to use stepping stones. Clean up the messes first, THEN build.
I want my children to grow up here, like I did. But Wildomar isn’t the same. There is drugs, and crime everywhere and nobody who could do anything about it bats an eye.
92595 30-39 White
137
1. 2.
3. 1.growth
2. Infrastructure projects
2. 3.
1.paving Clinton Keith fro
the 15 over pass Eastward
to the Muriettia boundry.
2. 3.
More business oriented 92595 70+ White
138
1. Close to freeway.
2. Affordable homes.
3. 1. Poor city roads,
disjointed community.
2. Not enough high-paying
jobs.
3. Poorly-rated schools.
Clinton Keith Rd needs to
be expanded to 2 lanes in
both directions from the I-
15 to the border of
Murrieta.
School ratings that rival Temecula and Murrieta. Better bike paths and trails. Attract more career-oriented businesses, rather than service jobs. Temecula is dragging their feet on a new competition-level aquatics center. Maybe Wildomar should build one and built up business around it. Brush should be cleared regularly, it's a fire hazard. Give us a reason to live, work, and play in Wildomar - instead of just live. 40-49 White
139
1. Rural
2. Safe
3. Quiet
1. Too much development
2. Crime
3. Potholes in roads
1. Police
2. Community events
3. Open spaces
Keep it rural! No more multi-unit housing or big development. 92595 60-69 White 57 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 16 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
140
1.the open surroundings
and scenery
2.a small hometown feel,
history
3.a growong young diverse
cummunity
1.growing infrastructure
2. lack of areas for the
cummunity to meet/ shop/
play/ entertainment
3. Revenue
1.officials going into
neighborhoods, meeting
the community
2.improved roads, street
signs
afordable homes
To create an area or district where we have an official wildomar Downtown walk and convention center and maybe even a (music hall / arena / amphitheater ?) to bring people together and money into the city while creating local jobs. Most people have no clue about wildomar. They drive by to other venues! Lets make us a place to stop and know! Improved roads are a sign of organizational strength and pride. Thats what people see and feel coming into our city.
Next is the cleanliness we keep in our right ways.
Next comes openess of our surroundings, we can be a complex busy city or keep it simple home town feel with affordable homes and small businesses districts to support our local community needs.
People love history and entertainment but also a safe and clean community to live and visit.
So Lets bring those to our community and our visitors of today and tomorrow! When this happens lets celebrate with a festival and parade, this could be an annual event thru our downtown walk! 92595 40-49 White
141
1.Quiet
2. RURAL
3. Light traffic.
1. High density
development
2. No green space
3. Putting corporate greed
ahead of small town
atmosphere.
1.more open space,
preserves
2. More jogging/biking
paths
3. Small business
Rural, stop high density housing. Preserve open spaces and wilderness area. 92595 60-69 other 142
before Richmond
homestead on Palomar it
was quiet
don’t like the assholes that
voted the Kaiser building in
1.Paid for city council
members
3. We need all new city
council.
1.more parks
2.Less corporate whore and
businesses
3. New city council
members.
Well you guys have ruined a lot of it. For 12 years we watched lies about the brown house and then the Kaiser buildings.
Using our tax dollars to change Baxter road to wildomar trail which was a complete waste.
What are we wanting people to pull off the freeway and go see the Kaiser buildings.
You guys are idiots and can’t manage city planning better that a 3 year old. 40-49 White
143
1.Quiet, easy freeway
access, close to shopping
2. 3.
1.too much “filler” growth,
like car washes, storage
facilities, not enough
deputies
2. 3.
1.slower growth, BETTER
restaurants
2. 3.
It stays smaller then big Murrieta/Temecula it is not filled with taco shops, & liquor stores 92595 70+ White 144
1.rural
Family community
Law abiding
2. 3.
1.roadwork
2. 3.infrastructures
Public pool1.
2.nice dog park
3.water park for families
To keep it a rural town without industrial buildings 92595 50-59 Hispanic_or_Latino 145
1.Nothing now that it is a
city
2. 3.
1.corrupt politicians
2. 3.
1.less building
2.leave empty land alone
3.go back to being county
not city
Leave vacant land vacant . Stop all this needless building.. we need empty spaces.. why build more home ,apartments, businesses if we keep having a drought.. just a bunch of stupid ass politicians making money.. leave things alone.. I used to like Wildomar when I bought here 30 years ago but not anymore.. it went to hell when it became a city.. I would love to look at a vacant lot than have a damn neighbor so close they can hear more fart!! Stop building!! American_Indian_and_Alaska_Nat
i
146
1.Still a quiet community
2.Not bombarded with
homelessness/crime
3.Solid great restaurants
1.Not as much stuff to do
2.Not that many significant
jobs that are higher paying
3Solid community
statement
1More community
activities for residents
2small business showcase
like downtown Murrieta
3Arts,music fests
My vision is that there would be a set spot for creativity to flourish. Where everyone could have a safe haven being outside but also having ample shade to withstand heat. Having activities for everyone that coincides with the season and weather of Wildomar.
92595 40-49 Asian
58 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 17 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
147
1.small town
2.frendly people
3.low crime
1.Growth of people and
building
2.Road conditions
expansion and repair
3.Community senior care
programs
1.Less residential growth
2. Less commercial growth
3. Return to small town
Return to small town vision. Stop trying to become like surrounding city's. IE Murrieta. Slow down all the building residential and commercial. Fix the existing roads. 92595 70+ 148
1. Farm/horse, rural country
2. Not a lot of traffic to get
where I need to
3. Small-town vibe
1. Over-development of
unnecessary places/things,
brand new houses
2. Keeping the roads pot-
hole free
3. 1. Community events
2. Gardens/more
trees/fruit trees
3. Better paved roads
Stop building so many new houses… protect/repair/upgrade what is already here… more paths for horses… add more trees, flowers/gardens & DEFINITELY edible plants & fruit producing trees for everyone!! 92595 30-39 White 149
1.rural
2.less traffic
3.family oriented
1.needs money
2.getting more mom and
pop restaurants with cool
/beach vibes
3. Infrastructure needs
work
1. Mom & pop bar and
grills with Beach vibes
2. Specialty :Trader Joe’s
,sprouts
3. Maybe our own water
park
May be a combination of all of it,cool restaurants bar and grills, Some businesses such as your Kaiser buildings but not too much more of those and everything needs to be designed where it’s nice and not junky looking’s with a nice coloring (not blue and red).
Need to fix up the corner next to post office, even if a parking lot is put in could be tastefully done instead of leaving it a dirt lot.
92595 60-69 White
150
1. Friendly
2. 3.
1. Communication about
projects
2. Overgrowth of
apartments and houses
3. Lack of planning
1. Open space
2. Rural atmosphere
preserved
3. Outdoor venues/farmers
markets etc.
A downtown that preserves a rural atmosphere - independently owned businesses. Nix the Arco/7-11 on every corner.
Create am ambiance that encourages community interaction - right now, everything is hodge-podge. The area with City Local is about the only nice place to go to socialize. Palomar could be revitalized in a way that encourages local shops. 151
1. It's rural but has the
benefits of city life.
2. Small town feel
3. 1. Illegal immigration
2. Crime
3. 1. Small family farms
2. Gun ranges
3. A place that looks and feels like a small town in classic Norman Rockwell's America with some modern aspects. More local farming with farmers markets.
152
1. Quiet
2. Lack of traffic
3. Weather
1. Too long for road
construction
2. No pedestrian paths
along Bundy Canyon
3. 1. 7/11 store
2. Not enough food choices
3. Increase park amenities
More pedestrian paths for running and biking along Bundy canyon. Would be nice to have designated path for bikers and runners that encircled Wildomar from Bundy canyon to Clinton Keith 92595 30-39 Black_or_African_American 153
1. Rural atmosphere
2. Small town feel
3. Mountain views
1. Traffic
2. Commercial zoning
3. Homelessness
1. Police; Security
2. Restaurants
3. Open space/parks
Quality restaurants so we don't have to go to Murrieta/Temecula. Keep our tax dollars here. Infrastructure keep up with growth, i.e., roads, etc. 92595 60-69 White
154
1. Small Town
2. Neighborliness
3. Climate
1. Water
2. Traffic
3. Lack of Commercial
Development
1. Multi-use trails
2. Parks
3. Large Retail
A walkable town that can meet the needs of the populace without sending them driving to other towns. 92595 60-69 White 155
1.small town
2.quiet
3. 1.growth
2. 3.
1.road maintenance
2.cleanup roadside
3. Keep open spaces available by not developing every inch of land in the city. 92595 40-49 59 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 18 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
156
1. The weather
2. My home
3. My Councilman
1. Insufficient police staffing
2. HUGE road maintenance
backlog
3. Dearth of city services &
amenities
1. Proactive policing &
Traffic Enforcement
2. REAL Road maintenance
3. Municipal services and
amenities
NOT WILDO-COMPTON!
A city where existing single-family residential neighborhoods are protected from “slum-hood” resulting from multi-unit construction on single family home zoned properties, AND close proximity three-story abominations (think Tres Lagos and incompatible diesel Truck Stops!
A city where much of the existing rural zoned properties are maintained or developed as such by those with the resources to do so, with my thanks, their aesthetics benefiting the entire community.
A city which has not “pissed” away all the commercially valuable freeway/offramp adjacent properties to low city revenue producing development, (think three story apartments and medical buildings).
A city with well-maintained roads and right-of-ways.
A city with enough fire stations.
A city with enough policing.
A city with sufficient parks, not necessarily a requirement that every playground be covered with “Gucci” sunshades. (:>) Actually, A WILDO-MURRIETA!
I am 73. Ce la vie! Never going to happen!
92595 70+ White
157
1. Smaller town
2. Homes are reasonably
priced
3. Close to everything
1. Getting overpopulated
2. Not getting enough
votes for taxes that will
help our city
3. 1. Street lights
2. Sidewalks
3. Better roads with curbs
To clean up some of the poorly kept houses and properties. Adding lamp posts or some kind of lighting. Improving our streets by adding curbs and sidewalks and more bike trails. Keeping our streets clean from trash. Building more stores and restaurants and please no more churches.
40-49
Native_Hawaiian_and_Other_Paci
f,White,Two_or_More_of_the_ab
ove_Races/
158
1. Trees!
2. Birds!
3. Small town
1. Over development
2. Avoiding that "suburb"
feel
3. 1. Bike lanes
2. A town square with
locally owned businesses
and regular events.
As stated above. 92595 50-59,60-69 White
159
1.small town feel but not
back country
2.mostly quiet
3.responsive city employees
1.need more revenue
sources
2.an attractive sports
complex
3. Road maintenance
1.revenue sources
2.variety of shops..not just
oil change or car washes
3. More usable parks
Wildomar needs to continue growing. As much as I love the small town feel, we need revenue. We need to attract people into our city. A sports complex that would allow for tournaments as well as a hotel for them to stay... money maker.
92595 50-59 White
160
1. Close proximity to larger
cities
2. Small town
3. Relaxed
1. Need more sources of
revenue
2. Need grocery stores
3. Need shopping areas
1. Grocery
2. Retail
3. Nice roads
Any future housing builds to include property so you’re not right on top of your neighbor.
Sidewalks, parks, recreation for kids. 92595 30-39 White 161
1. Small town
2. city is trying to make it
better
3. The community activities
4. Our P.O. staff is the best
1. Crime & vandalism
2. Roads & traffic
3. Forgetting about
improving older areas but
building new
1. Better restaurants not
fast food
2. City center or gathering
place
3. Community activities
we are an "in betweener town" I feel like we're trying to grow up to be our own place & have all the things here, but honestly when I go out, I ask myself do I need to go to a surrounding town to do what I need to do. It would be nice to keep the $ here. I also feel that the city is trying to make this a better place, but have forgotten about some of the older areas that have become worn down & are eye sores.
With the increase of homes, have come the increase of crime & vandalism. The police that we do have are stretched so thin. They are great but just not enough.
It would be nice to have some sort of city center area. Our town seems like more of a mish mash. No real heart of the city. Murrieta created one. Temecula and Elsinore's old Towns are theirs. What is Wildomar's? The bell at the elementary school? The park? The post office/cemetery?
We love living here. love our neighborhood but glad we raised our kids in Murrieta because there was so much to do without leaving town
92595 50-59 White
162
1. Less traffic than
surrounding cities
2. Small town feel
3. View of the Ortegas
1. Road conditions
2. Crime
3. 1. Safe bicycle / pedestrian
routes in all neighborhoods
2. Enforcement of stop
signs
3. I would love for Wildomar to remain a place where horses, goats, and chickens are welcome. I hope that in our quest to attract tax dollars the city needs, we don’t lose touch with our roots. 92595 50-59 White 60 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 19 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
163
1. Nice parks
2. 3.
1. Finish the construction
by Bundy canyon.
2. Junk in yards
3. Pave the 20% of dirt
roads in wildomar.
1.Pave the dirt roads
2. More trees
3. PAVE THE DIRT ROADS
Stop paving the same roads and actually pave the dirt roads in wildomar. It's ridiculous! 92595 30-39 White 164
1.Small town feel.
2. Businesses work with the
community.
3. Fun small town events.
1. Bad roads
2. Saving funds for the
future.
3. Diversifying businesses
—no department stores
here
1. A long term vision
2. Better use of zoning
along Clinton Keith
3. More diversity in
businesses.
Keep some areas rural —more on the west side
Increase other areas in diversified businesses—east side Define our purpose, mission for long term— what is the City of Wildomar going to be known as? 92595 60-69 White 165
1.it’s a farm like feel
2. We have great
community activities
3. Great place to live
1. Too much new
construction
2. Crowding
3. Slow construction
1. 2.
3. A small family community 92595 30-39 Hispanic_or_Latino 166
1. 2.
3. 1.
2. 3.
1. 2.
3. a small city with connections to rural areas and wildlife corridors, an emphasis on education and the history of the area
167
Small town feel
2.close enough to
amenities
3.good air quality
1.overgrowth
2.small town political views
3.public transportation
1.keeping it rural
2.limit of new housing
3.public transportation
Keeping a rural atmosphere. A little more response from police dept. 92595 60-69 White 168
1. Small town feel.
2. Generally the weather is
nice.
3. Limited crime
1. Tax revenue
2. Traffic issues
3. Getting developers
interest
1. Timed lights
2. Limiting light pollution
3. More cleanup days
Wildomar is a great little community. How viable is it long term I'm not sure. It would be great if the city could be totally self sufficient but I'm not sure if there are enough resources. I personally would love a drive in movie theater and a really great network of hiking trails.
92595 40-49 White
169
1. country
2. my town
3. people enjoy literature
1. We need a city library
2. We need to foster
literacy at a city level
3. roads are terrible
1. better roads
2. city library
3. literacy programs
better roads and a CITY library 92595 50-59 White
170
1. Rural
2. Open space
3. Less traffic
1. Not having a municipal
library
2. Growth without
infrastructure
3. Keeping Wildomar rural
1. Municipal library!
2. Homes with acreage
3. Natural spaces
First, I would like to see Wildomar remain rural/semi-rural. That's why I chose to live here in the first place. Secondly, we need a municipal library. The county library is too small to handle the growth of the city, and due to RCLS constraints, does not meet the needs of our community at large. Having a city library would allow for more community involvement with more resources for all demographics. Libraries are now community centers, not just places to read books. It would be great to have a larger space to incorporate a maker space, larger community room, more programs and to let the community know that we care by offering these free services. 92595 40-49 White
61 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 20 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
171
1. the open feeling of the
city
2. cleanliness of the roads
3. the city has a hospital
1.no sense of community
or soul
2. There are no parks or
community centers or
pools ,
1. parks
2. 3. community pool, adult
center, youth
A city that provides its citizens a healthy sustainable and safe place to live, with parks and trees and ponds and fishing, and trails..
A community that thrives in building sustainable areas that all people can enjoy and betters the planet at the same time.
That gives families a place to play and grow and learn.
A city that prides itself in community building and providing its children places to learn and be safe, outdoor spaces that give families a reason to stay in the city on the weekends and programs that enhance the lives of all that live here.
A world class library,
Amphitheater
Town Center
Adult Care Centers
Youth Center
Community Pool
Baseball fields
Soccer fields
Trees planted for future cooling of the whole city
Fruit trees planted so the hungry and pick them.
Services provided by the city to enhance the lives of all 92595 60-69 White
172
1.The Library
2.The many food options
3.The parks
1. Expansion
2.Gentrification
3.Water Conservation
1.Less houses
2.More scenic views
3.Low rent
A place that stays wide and doesn't try to be what its not to fill people's pockets. Selling out all our land and blocking our views of the mountains. 20-29 White
173
1.helpful, friendly neighbors
2.interesting history
3.rare traffic jams
1.providing high quality
amenities
2.addiction-related crime
and homelessness
3.transportation
1.bigger library
2.easy battery/bulb
recycling & redemption of
CRV items
3.classes/rec./enrichment
programs
Capitalize on scenery, weather, location, history (1800s female cofounder was college grad/successful author of stories set in places like Wildomar).
Let's build a civic center in historic area (Palomar./Wildomar Trail), by post office, cemetery and school bell.. Add a city hall, library/rec. center with cost-efficient multi-purpose spaces for meetings, classes, shows, historical displays and income-producing events (weddings, quincañeras). Include a playground for kids and a courtyard "playground" for adults, featuring a bistro, outdoor movies, performances, weddings, etc. Create a nearby transit hub linking Tem. Valley to metro area transit (Metrolink, Coaster, trollies) to provide viable transportation for business (commutes, business travel, medical appts.) and recreation (airports, beaches, cultural sites). Entice diverse jobs (min. wage to high-paid careers) with these amenities. Long commutes harm physical/mental health, so quality mixed use development is encouraged..
92595 60-69
174
1. World Harvest Church
2. Historical Reads
3. Diverse neighborhoods
1. Aged/tattered roads
2. Open land that isn't very
used
3. more opportunities to
build business locations
1. build a community
garden
2. A sports park for the
community to gather and
make memories
3. My vision for Wildomar is for the city and its people develop in a way that makes people want to "cruise through" the city 92562 20-29
175
1. Small
2. Walking, hiking
3. Great Trails
1. Growth
2. Signal lights
3. Pedxing, traffic
1. Open Space
2. Events, Outdoor
3. Interaction w/city
(Walking, hiking, biking
trails)
To ensure our small city stays rural, less housing 92595 60-69 176
1. Small
2. Friends
3. Trails
1. Growth
2. Signal lights
3. Traffic
1. Open spaces
2. Events community
3. More hiking/biking trails
Stays rural, less housing 92595 60-69
62 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 21 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
177
1. Less traffic
2. Small town feel
3. New stores
1. Fence laying orange st
2. Clean up orange/bundy
3. Walnut st needs
Resurfacing
1. Roads resurfaced
(Walnut st)
2. Clean up
3. Continue with updating and making our city look nice. We’re happy to see nice changes along Grand. We drive bundy canyon to orange street daily. It’s awful. The fence has been laying on the ground for years 92595 50-59 White 178
1. Trails
2. Some undeveloped space
3.community activities in
the park
1. Loss of dark skies
2. traffic chokepoints
3. bike and walking trails
not fully connecting
1. Attention to light
pollution
2. larger conservation areas
3. collaboration with other
cities on lighting
Preserve the rural and open space character where possible. One character that can be preserved without affecting growth is dark skies, as this requires only attentiveness to the type of light fixtures. 92595 60-69 White 179
1.farming
2.quiet
3.small
1.dirt roads remaining next
to new builds
2.pot holes in streets
3. 1.keeping the city as is
2.no more new
construction
3. Improving residential
streets
Everything is good as is. I would like to see the city stay the same and keeping the open farm life the city has. It’s disappointing seeing the trees gone and new construction going on off the wildomar trails’s freeways exit. The new build will not match the city of wildomar for the area that it’s being added to. Maybe it could have been an addition near the inland valley hospital. I would like to see roads fixed and paved roads added to the residential homes near Gruwell. 92595 30-39
180
Open space, enviormental
strength,
Vision for future
Attention to the peoples
opinion
Great city
Water, green space,
carbon, traffic control1.
2. 3.
Kindness, and support of
neighbors1.
2. 3.
Growth, vision, strength in numbers 92601 70+ White
181
1. Community
2. Safe small town
3. Open spaces
1. Higher density building
causing damage to roads
and traffic
2. No community center
3. Revenue
1. Old town strip like
murrieta
2. Equestrian spaces
3. Community center with
programs for adults and
kids
Keep it rural and take it back to its western roots. We can be a refuge for people to visit who need a break from the crowded city (Temecula). We can host outdoor rural events for those inside and outside of our city. 92595 40-49 White 182
1. 2.
3. 1. Getting Bundy Canyon
project done
2. Bus route up Bundy to
MSJC
3. More businesses
1. Parks
2. Bundy bus route
3. Better traffic flow —
connect Bundy wiith
Clinton Keith
Wonderfulness 60-69 White
183
1.small
2.quiet
3.easy access to 15
1.unfinished construction
areas
2.not enough dining
3.no outdoor rec
1.walking running path
2.wider road on Bundy
canyon
3.more food
Small but vibrant city with outdoor activities such as walking and running paths 92595 30-39 Black_or_African_American 184
1. Open Space/ Rural
2. Dark skies
3. Landscape
1. Roads
2. Accumulated trash on
properties
3. Maintenance
1. Sidewalks
2. Paved Streets
3. Stores to Shop
Downtown center, paved roads, little boutique shops.
185
1. Rural
2. Friendly
3. Mostly quiet
1. Too much construction
2. Losing the country
atmosphere
3. Noisy and more traffic
and unfriendliness
1. Bring back the country
atmosphere
2. 3.
I moved to Wildomar from Orange county to get away from the hustle and bustle of a big city. Wildomar is now getting too much like Orange county. I would like to see construction halted to reestablish and maintain the country atmosphere that Wildomar once had.
92595 70+ White
63 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 22 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
186
1. I was able to afford to
buy a house here.
2. It's located near family.
3. The traffic isn't too bad.
1. Some properties look
like trash.
2. Not very
walkable/bikeable.
3. Looks like a wasteland
(drought).
1. People taking down
trashy, divisive political
flags and slogans.
2. Sidewalks and bike lanes.
3. Rain.
My vision would be for people to take pride in their community, clean up their trashed out properties, have the streets looking more finished with sidewalks and gutters, more living trees, take down all the dead trees and bushes everywhere. 92595 40-49 White 187
1. small-town feel.
2. The members of the city
council.
3. 1. Not enough money for
more police.
2. 3.
1.faster police response for
prowlers, illegal fireworks,
and racing cars.
2.more Public
transportation.
3. I like where the city council is leading us. 92595 30-39,60-69 White 188
1.Clean
2.Growing
3.New
1attract more people from
surrounding City's
2.There needs to be more a
draw to City
3. Community Support
1.Medical
2.Office
3.Retail
I think Wildomar needs to have a draw to bring people there. We have Plenty of Restaurants! We need more Commercial retail , Shops, gyms, Theaters to bring people to town. The should help businesses survive give people to do living in Wildomar
92595 50-59 other
189
1. Stores are close
2 Neighbors
3. it's small
1. homelessness
2.burgleress
3.drugs
1.City wide Major Art Work
2.widing of Palomar road
3.less gas stations and
more electrical stations
Defiantly more open space epically for dogs and animals. A lot more (if you even had any) art work such as statues and paintings and a Wildomar Logo put every where. Lets have better services for the elderly and help them get out of their homes. It is not easy.
92595 60-69 White
190
1.wide open spaces
2.historically slow growth
3.no big shopping centers
1.traffic and speed,
thoroughfare
2.open land disappearing
3.growing too fast
1.septic changed to sewer
2. Traffic enforcement
3.programs for seniors or
shut-ins
It's difficult for me to envision Wildomar in 2040 because in all likelihood I won't be here. I know some want to see growth but I miss the rural community I fell in love with, the open spaces and quiet, the breathtaking sunsets. I used to park on McVicker and watch the sun go down. A new housing project will block that view. Give the community a facelift and improve roads to entice small businesses that will draw consumers for financial growth and stop building new communities. That's my vision.
92595 70+ White
191
1. Small town feel
2. Don't have the
congestion like neighboring
towns.
3. Small businesses.
1. Stop residential bldg.
2. Stop commercial bldg.
3. Keeping our small town
small. Take another exit!
1. More Agricultural family
business.
2. Neighbors on horseback
again.
3. More PD/Sheriffs Clinton
Keith
To remain a small town where we know/recognize each other. Support of our family businesses.
To not be another commuter, fast food, cheap stores exit on the I15 corridor. There's enough residential/commercial bldg started/finished. Needs to be a cap! Plans to make us another congested exit off the I15 is deplorable. Stop it! We need our fresh fruit/vegetables business back, family owned businesses and safe neighborhoods.
There's already a rise in crime and transients.
There's plenty of hospitals, medical buildings, gas stations, dollar stores and retailers. You can travel to the next nearest exits and see the same cheap retailers, home improvement and big box stores. Why the need to pollute our lovely town with what the is already available nearby?
Catering to commuters who move here for less expensive living for their tax dollars to build us into what they left and what they bring with them is an obvious money grab and needs to stop.
Keep Wildomar small and family friendly.
92595 50-59 White
192
1.mountains
2.small town
3.wildlife
1.Over population
2.Traffic
3.Housing taking up land.
1.Open Spaces
2.Consideration for Wildlife
3.Cemeteries
To remain as Rural as possible and Unique as possible. 92595 60-69 White 193
1.Hometown feeling
2.Good people
3. Marna O'Brien Park
1. Speeders on Grand Ave
2. 3.
1.Reduce speed limit on
Grand Ave
2. Gates at Marna O'Brien
Park open at sunrise, the
opening time
3. With water shortage, why so much new housing to use more water? 92595 60-69 White 64 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 23 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
194
1. 2.
3. 1.keep up with traffic and
keep traffic from building
up
2. Crime rates
3. Homeless
1. Community service
2.community club house
3. Public
To have more community things. Like a ymca. Where people can go swimming and enjoy work outs and have community clubs for children and more family friendly parks 92595 40-49 195
1.Close to our family
2.Close to shopping
3.View from our house
1.Roads need improvement
2.Traffic enforcement
3.Properties not maintained
1.Downtown for community
2.More retail
3.Code enforcement
I would like to see the town being more cared for and places to go to in Wildomar. Keep the retail dollars in Wildomar rather than having them go to other cities. I would like people to keep their yards maintained and take pride in ownership. I would like the City and City Council to be more proactive in attracting business and development. Also, Code Enforcement should be out citing what the council puts in place for our community to put forth a positive presence for our community.
92595 60-69 White
196
1.small community
2.family oriented
3.close to everything
1.Tres Lagos Project
2.bringing in mental health
people into our community
3.water supply
1.parks
2.transportation
3.street cleaning
From what I see with the approval of Tres Lagos that our community will only go downhill. 92595 70+ Hispanic_or_Latino 197
1.not too crowded
2.lower cost of living
3.convenient access to
freeway
1.no community center
2.lack of police presence
3.apathy of its residents
1.police patrols
2.walking trails
3.community involvement
Wildomar will continue to be a bedroom community if we do not have our own community center. There needs to be more low income housing, even though it would be unpopular. 92595 other 198
1. NOT congested
2. Streets are maintained
3. Added horse lanes along
major road
1. Ukept trashy residences
2. Palm trees need pruning
3. Undeveloped vacant land
1. Sidewalks
2. Stores & Markets
3. Restaurants
To look like Murrieta.
199
1. Affordability
2. Equestrian / chickens
and small farm animals
3. Small town
1. Roads and drainage
2. Trashy yards and homes
in certain areas
3. No clothing
stores/shopping
1. Parks with pools or
water parks
2. Nice department stores
3. Community center for all
ages
No gangs, or homeless communities
Large park with community center
Neighborhoods cleaned up/beautified
92595 60-69 White
200
1.Country style of living
2.convenience of grocery
stores
3.country roads
1.over crowding
2.medical facilities
3.police force
1.sprouts grocery store
2.senior center
3.sizzler
More parks
Walking trails for seniors
Fix Clinton Keith’s street
2595 70+ White,Two_or_More_of_the_abov
e_Races/
201
1. Quiet
2. Small town feel
3. Friendly
1. Keeping crime low
2. Outgrowing the small-
town feel
3. 1. Sidewalks
2. Micro Breweries
3. Mom & Pop type
restaurants
Leave it as is!
Seriously though, don’t fill all the open spaces with buildings, parking lots or low-income housing. Moved here in 2018 and have loved the small town feel of Wildomar. I hate seeing the developments taking up the open spaces (yeah, talking about the Wildomar Trail project).
92595 40-49 White
202
1.small town feel
2.rural area
3.friendly people
1.roads need repairs
2.street lights, need more of
3.police patroling more.
1.police patrol
2.street sweeping
3.roads fixed
To continue to have the small town, rural feel. I enjoy seeing farm animals in the area, keep the life style in Wildomar simple. 92595 50-59 Hispanic_or_Latino
203
1. Quiet
2. Friendly people
3. Close to Murrietta &
Temecula, but more
affordable housing
1. Old, run down
neighborhoods
2. Not enough shopping
centers
3. Weaker school systems
1. Newer buildings,
shopping centers etc
2. New housing projects
3. Better school options
New, safe and expanding city with lots of opportunities for professional local work (a lot of us commute), better schools, more green areas-parks for children. A town center- main street like Old Town Temecula would be a plus. A larger grocery store or a shopping center chain would be greatly appreciated (Costco, Walmart, Target). 92595 30-39 White
204
1. rural
2. small
3.close to freeeways
1.bundy canyon pot holes
2.code enforcement
3.weed abatement/fire
hazards
1.work on bundy canyon
2.more police activity
3. to become more self sustaining and more new areas 92595 50-59 White 65 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 24 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
205
1.rural
2.no traffic
3.no street lights
1.police response time
2.streets falling apart
3.lack of bike lanes
1.police
2.more neighborhood
watch
3.more bike lanes
Moved to wildomar in 1995 when we still had hitching posts at one of the only markets in town. I loved the how rural it was. I know that growth has to happen but what we need is growth that will actually bring in money to the city. High rise dr offices will not bring in money for the city.
92595 50-59 White
206
1. FAMILY
2. WOKE FREE
3. COMMUNITY
1. FAR LEFT DEMS
2. BIG BOX STORES
3. TOO FEW JOBS
1. MOM AND POP BIZ
2. PARKS FOR FAMILIES
3. MORE INFRASTUCTURE
GENTLEMAN STYLE RANCHES 1 OR 2 ACRES MAX. KEEP FAMILY AS THE KEY TO THE FUTURE HERE. PROMOTE RESPECT IN THE COMMUNITY WITH ONE ANOTHER 70+ Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac es/
207
1.proximity
2.up and coming
3. 1.infrastructure
2. Economic development
3. 1. Community
2. Retail and grocery stores
near bundy canyon
3. Self sustainable / economic development (residents not having to travel to nearby cities for goods), more community development / opportunities for youth 92595 30-39 Hispanic_or_Latino 208
1.mountains
2.rural feel
3.open spaces
1.traffic that comes with
growth
2.maintaining rural feel
3.not becoming Orange
County
1.walking paths
2.bike lanes
3.good restaurants
Rural, open feel …that all are welcome here, with open spaces and walking/bike/horse paths. 92595 70+ White 209
1.The small town feel
2.The rural feel
3.The closeness to anything
I might need
1.Taking forever to get
anything done.
2.Lack of citizen
involvement
3.Open City Council - NO
DISTRICTS
1.A few more larger
businesses for shopping
2.More speeding tickets -
ex: Bundy Canyon
3.A community center
All the things I mentioned above 92595 60-69 White
210
1.Open space
2.calm/friendly due to low
density
3.family oriented
1.overbuilding too quickly
2.Increased Demands for
water and electric
3.road
congestion/increasing
density
1.parks /open space
2.local city events -farmers
market
3.take care of Wildomar
interest first
Like it just the way it is. Slow down rapid building. We should have a 20+ year plan in place. Hopefully this is the case.
We should preserve Wildomar while growing to accommodate our children’s local housing needs and our aging.
However, we should not feel like we have to become a housing “build, build, build; there’s a national housing crises” sanctuary for the nation’s shortages.
92595 40-49 American_Indian_and_Alaska_Nat
i
211
1. Easy access to fwy.
2. Close to schools and
Dairy
3. For the most part, it's
quiet
1.Tore up roads.
2.Lack of sidewalks for kids
walking to school
3.Tag all over
4.Bundy/Sellars issue.
1. More stores and
restaurants
2. Nice landscape on the on
and off ramps of freeways.
3. Bike paths
Well kept safe city. With clean and nicely paved roads. Sidewalks for our kids to get all over. Parks and bike paths 92595 50-59 White 212
1.open spaces
2. 3.
1.loss of rural areas
2.too many homes
3.keeping up infrastructure
maintenance and repair
1. keep rural and horse
properties from being
eaten up by development
2.new city council.
3. Stick to the wildomar roots 60-69 White
213
1. Population
2. Scenery
3.taxes
1. Road work
2. Rural areas
3. Landscaping
1. Upkeep
2. Stores
3. Community gatherings
Small town feel with modern style shops, like Victoria gardens, time for some upgrades 92595 40-49 White 214
1. Population
2. Scenery
3.taxes
1. Road work
2. Rural areas
3. Landscaping
1. Upkeep
2. Stores
3. Community gatherings Small town feel with modern style shops, like Victoria gardens, time for some upgrades 92595 40-49 White 215
1.rural
2.peaceful
3.open
1.crime
2.dumping
3.infrastructures
1.infrastructures
2.public amenities
3.common sense To remain rural with limited growth as the infrastructure improves. 92595 50-59 White 66 APPENDIX A: Let's Envision Wildomar Survey Responses 25 What do you like about
Wildomar?
What challenges face the
City of Wildomar?
What would you like to
see more of? What’s your vision for Wildomar? Where do
you live?
What is
your age?
How would you identify your
race/ethnicity?
216
1.small town feel
2.rural/horses, trails/open
spaces
3.council members/mayor
accessible at city events
1.run down/weedy
properties
2. Enticing businesses to
benefit OUR residents.
Restaurants, shopping.
3.roads
1.events for adults
2.workshops-gardening
3.unique restaurants,
shopping & experiences
For Clinton Keith to become a major traveled road containing larger stores like target and decent restaurants. Keep Wildomar Trail rural. Put all the big business and traffic on Clinton Keith. I’d love to see an equestrian center and more focus on horse trails and hiking. Make Wildomar Trail a “old town“ with the school bell, post office, cemetery, antiques, shops, restaurants. 92595 60-69 White
217
1. Accessible, open-minded
city staff.
2. Safe community
3. Business-friendly
1. Development costs
2. Few incentives for
people and businesses to
move here
3. Tax base, limited growth
1. Housing and
entertainment
2. Friendly business climate
3. Incentives to develop
difficult terrain
"Why should my business/family move to Wildomar vs Murrieta/Menifee/Elsinore?" Only 3% growth since 2010, is that correct? Don't create another Canyon Lake-style pretentious attitude at the city. There is no doubt we are in an economic slowdown, our communities are competing for fewer development dollars. Incentivize infrastructure development to attract more investment; developers can build affordable housing and entertainment to attract people.
We need more restaurants! Create an active lifestyle mix of rural and urban, family and adult entertainment (not THAT kind of adult entertainment) connected by efficient roads. Keep the pot shops/smoke shops OUT! There has been blighted housing and neighborhoods for too long. Underground the power lines (fire safety and gets rid of that blighted feel). We're headed in the right direction - we just need to be more aggressive to stave off competition from nearby cities. 50-59
218
1.low taxes
2 small town vibe
3. Hidden gem
1.small infrastructure
2. Homelessness
3. Crime/drugs(see #1)
1.road repair not horse
trails
2. Code enforcement,
places are looking sloppy.
Residential and commercial I imagine wildomar will be an apartment or storage facility haven. Maybe a park East of the 15? How long has Wildomar been a city? 2008? 92595 40-49
Two_or_More_of_the_above_Rac
es/
219 1.More of a country feel
2.Nice neighbors
3.quiet
1. 2.
3. 1.grocery store, shops,
bundy canyon area
2. 3.
Be similar to Norco, country feel but with all the amenities 92595 40-49 White 220
1 Liked it when the original
general plan was being
followed.
2. 3.
1. General Plan: Inability to
follow
3. Staff attitude.
Following the original
general plan Unfortunately
it's too late for these
suggestions. It's too late, the vision no longer exists. 60-69 other 221
1. Rural character of the
area
2. Easy access to 15
Freeway
3. Hometown feel
1. Lack of Infrastructure.
2. Minimal funding
3. Minimal revenue stream
1. Fire station, Senior Ctr,
Amphitheatre, Sheriff
station..
2. Equestrian trails
3. Cleaner properties
Continue Wildomar's vision to be a safe and active community with reasonable growth and quality infrastructure while keeping a hometown feel. Eliminate placements of Mobile Homes and require permanent structures only with off-site improvement requirements. Establish Infrastructure Districts for new developments to ensure proper roads, parks, fire station(s) are in place. Focus on improving older established areas, via road improvements and existing property clean- up improvements. Ensure trail system is in place for all new developments and continue to support the equestrian community. Ensure all new developments provide on site park and trail amenities.
Maintain rural feel throughout the city where possible. Implement citywide funding program that all residents are required to fund via property taxes for new Fire station, Sheriff/Police station, citywide street sweeping, landscaping, and road maintenance. Clean up properties throughout the city (eliminate blight). 92595 50-59 White 222 1.Peace
2.Quiet
3.Unique
1.Slow Development
2.Restaurants & shops are
not conveniently located
3. Bundy Canyon/Scott
dangerous road
1.Clinton Keith style
shopping center on Bundy
canyon
2. Trails to walk
3. Jobs such as
manufacturing
Have all services and conveniences that our neighboring cities have. More jobs, schools, shops. There needs to be a "downtown area" where the community can hang out. 92595 30-39 Hispanic_or_Latino 67 CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.1
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
Reading of Ordinances
SUBMITTED BY:
Janet Morales, City Clerk's Office
ACTION:
Approve the reading by title only of all Ordinances on this agenda. 68 CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.2
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
July 13, 2022 Minutes
SUBMITTED BY:
Jandi Aguilar, City Clerk's Office
PREPARED BY:
Jandi Aguilar, Administrative Analyst
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Minutes
69 MINUTES
CITY OF WILDOMAR
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JULY 13, 2022
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
23873 CLINTON KEITH ROAD SUITE 106
WILDOMAR, CA 92595
Members in attendance: Ben J Benoit, Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore, Dustin Nigg
Councilmember Nigg arrived at 6:08 pm.
Staff in Attendance: City Manager York, City Attorney Jex and City Clerk Morales.
CALL TO ORDER – CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 P.M.
The closed session meeting of July 13, 2022, of the Wildomar City Council, was conducted pursuant to Assembly Bill 361 with in-person attendance at the Wildomar Council Chambers, 23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 106, Wildomar, California, and via videoconferencing, and was called to order by Mayor Benoit at 5:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
All council members were present except council member Dustin Nigg. Council member Morabito arrived 5:02 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION
None
CLOSED SESSION
1. The City Council met in a closed session pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Sections 54956.9 (d)(1) and (4) to confer with legal counsel about the following matter of pending and potential initiation of litigation: the City of Long Beach, et al v. Monsanto Company, et al, United States Central District Court, Case No.: 2:16-cv-03493-FMO-AS
2. The City Council met in a closed session to hold a conference with its unrepresented employee representative City Manager Dan York regarding labor negotiations with unrepresented employees pursuant to Government Code 54957.6.
RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION
The City Council reconvened into an open session with all members present except Council member Nigg at 6:05 p.m.
70 ANNOUNCEMENTS
City Attorney Jex stated the following:
1. Council decided to opt out of the proposed settlement.
2. No reportable action.
ADJOURN CLOSED SESSION
There being no further business, Mayor Benoit adjourned the Closed Session at 6:05 p.m CALL TO ORDER – REGULAR SESSION - 6:00 P.M.
The regular session meeting of July 13, 2022, of the Wildomar City Council, was conducted pursuant to Assembly Bill 361 with in-person attendance at the Wildomar Council Chambers, 23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 106, Wildomar, California, and via videoconferencing, and was called to order by Mayor Benoit at 6:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Staff in Attendance City Manager York, City Attorney Jex, City Clerk Morales, Planning Director Bassi, Administrative Services Director Howell, Project Consultant Riley, Economic Development Director Davidson, Senior Engineer Farag, Development Manager Stadnik, Community Services Director Torres.
FLAG SALUTE
The flag salute was led by Vice-chair Morabito.
PRESENTATIONS
LifeStream Blood Bank Public Awareness Announcement- moved to August.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
1 General Plan Update Briefing - Envision Wildomar 2040: The Future By Design Planning Director Bassi presented the department report. 2 Economic Development Department Update Economic
Director Davidson presented the staff report.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following individuals provided public comment
1. Gina Castanon with time donated by Ruben Castanon for a total of 6 minutes
2. Ken Mayes
3. Gayl Taylor
4. Mari Bacon,Tri City Gators
71 COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
The City Council Members spoke regarding the various committees, commissions, and boards that they serve on locally and regionally and community events, including:
1. Community events
2. Regional events Chamber of Commerce
3. Riverside Conservation Authority (RCA)
4. Riverside Transit Agency (RTA)
5. Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)
6. League of California Cities
7. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
8. Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA)
9. Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
10.South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
11.Southwest Community Financing Authority (Animal Shelter)
12.Ad Hoc & Subcommittee
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED
Moved by Joseph Morabito; seconded by Bridgette Moore to Add Agenda Item regarding AB361 Resolution to the Agenda.
Motion Passed: 4 - 0
Voting For: Ben J Benoit, Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Dustin Nigg
Moved by Joseph Morabito; seconded by Bridgette Moore to Adopt RESOLUTION No. 2022 - 48, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZING THE NEED FOR TELECONFERENCING OPTION FOR CITY COUNCIL, COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS PURSUANT TO ASSEMBLY BILL 361 AND
MAKING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE SAME
Motion Passed: 4 - 0
Voting For: Ben J Benoit, Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Dustin Nigg
72 1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Moved by Bridgette Moore; seconded by Joseph Morabito to Approve all items on the consent calendar.
Motion Passed: 5 - 0
Voting For: Ben J Benoit, Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore, Dustin Nigg
Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
1.1 Reading of Ordinances
Approved the reading by title only of all Ordinances on the agenda.
1.2 Minutes - May 11, 2022 Regular Meeting
Approved minutes as presented.
1.3 Warrant Register June 2022
Approved the following:
Warrant Register dated 06-02-2022 in the amount of $79,353.89.
Warrant Register dated 06-09-2022 in the amount of $427,478.35.
Warrant Registers dated 06-16-2022 in the amount of $123,057.25.
Warrant Register dated 06-23-2022 in the amount of $169,919.45.
Warrant Register dated 06-30-2022 in the amount of $1,250,727.34.
Wire Transfer Register dated 06-30-2022 in the amount of $59,650.35.
Payroll Register dated 07-01-2022 in the amount of $206,536.89.
1.4 May 2022 Treasurers Report
Approved the Treasurer’s Report for May 2022.
1.5 Road Construction Updates - Public Works/Engineering Department Senior engineer CIP Farag provided a public works road construction update.
Dana Vincent provided public comment.
Received and filed the Road Construction Updates from the Public Works/Engineering Department.
1.6 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 218 and 219 for the Inland Valley Medical Center Expansion Project
1. Adopted Ordinance No. 218: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 20- 0116 TO CHANGE THE EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATION FROM I-P (INDUSTRIAL PARK) AND C-P-S (SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) TO M-C (MEDICAL CENTRE) ZONE FOR ENTIRE 22.24-ACRE SITE TO ACCOMMODATE
THE PROPOSED INLAND VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL EXPANSION PROJECT LOCATED AT 36485 INLAND VALLEY DRIVE (APN: 380-250-026) 73 2. Adopted Ordinance 219: ORDINANCE NO. 219, AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2022-04 (PA 20-0116) TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 17.86 (MEDICAL CENTER ZONE) TO ESTABLISH USE AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS FOR MEDICAL CENTERS IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR
1.7 Second Reading and Adoption of Special Tax Ordinance for Community Facilities District No. 2022-2 (Horizon Place)
Conducted the second reading of and adopted: ORDINANCE NO. 221,
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR,
CALIFORNIA ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-2 (HORIZON PLACE) OF THE
CITY OF WILDOMAR AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES
1.8 Second Reading and Adoption of Special Tax Ordinance for Community Facilities District No. 2022-1 (Services)
Conducted the second reading of and adopted: ORDINANCE NO. 220, AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR,
CALIFORNIA ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-1 (SERVICES) OF THE CITY OF
WILDOMAR AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES
1.9 Professional Services Agreement for On-Call Geotechnical and Materials Testing Services with Geocon West, Inc.
Authorized the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Geocon West, Inc. for On-Call Geotechnical and Materials Testing Services.
1.10 Fifth Amendment to Design Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Transportation Group for the Bundy Canyon Road Project
Authorized the City Manager to execute the Fifth Amendment to the Design Professional Services Agreement with Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. for Engineering Services for the Bundy Canyon Road Improvement Project.
1.11 First Amendment to Agreement with MuniServices LLC for Sales and Use Tax Analysis, Reporting & Audit Services and Franchise Fee and Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Audit Services
Approved and authorized the City Manager to execute an amendment with MuniServices LLC for Sales and Use Tax Analysis (SUTA), Sales/Use TaxReporting Services (STARS) and Franchise Fee (FF) and Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Audit Services for the City of Wildomar. 74 1.12 First Amendment to Agreement for Services between the City of Wildomar and HR Dynamics & Performance Management, Inc.
Approved the First Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Wildomar and HR Dynamics & Performance Management, Inc. as requested, with an additional $13,000 approved for the FY 2021/22 Human Resources Contractual Services budget and an additional $51,250 added for the FY 2022/23 Human Resources Contractual Services budget.
1.13 Contractual Services Agreement between the City of Wildomar and FoBro Consulting, LLC
Approved and authorized the City Manager to execute a contract with FoBro Consulting, LLC to provide consulting services for Homelessness program services, CDBG activities, and project-based developer reconciliation and billing services.
1.14 Acceptance of FY 2021 State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) Award
1. Accepted $4,194 in funding from Riverside County’s FY 2021 State Homeland Security Program (SHSP).
2. Adopted a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-40, A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN THE FY 2021 STATE HOMELAND
SECURITY PROGRAM (SHSP) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF
THE CITY
1.15 Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring Agreements and Project Budget Amendment- Palomar Street/Clinton Keith Road Sidewalk, Trail, and Bike Lane Connectivity Project (CIP 059)
1. Authorized the City Manager to execute Cultural Resource Monitoring Agreements with the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the Pachanga Band of Indians.
2. Appropriated an additional $167,000 from Fund 503 (TUMF) for the project construction budget.
1.16 Levy and Collection of Special Taxes within Community Facilities District No. 2013-1 (Services) for Fiscal Year 2022-23
Adopted a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022 -41, A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING
THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2013-1 (SERVICES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 75 1.17 Measure AA Oversight Advisory Committee Appointments Reviewed the application for Committee Membership and appointed Kathleen Kovich to the Measure AA Oversight Advisory Committee for a term ending June 2024.
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
2.1 Authorization for Additional Solid Waste Fees Related to Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Law, (SB 1383) for CR&R Incorporated Administrative Analyst Jantz present staff report.
Moved by Bridgette Moore; seconded by Dustin Nigg to Adopt Resolution No. 2022 – 42, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING SB 1383 COMPLIANCE FEE ADJUSTMENTS FOR
CR&R INCORPORATED WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES
Motion Passed: 5- 0
Voting For: Ben J Benoit, Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore, Dustin Nigg
Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
2.2 CFD 2022-1 (Services) Annexation No. 1 - Calling an Election, Ordering the Levy and Collection of Special Taxes, and Declaring the Election Results City Manager York present the staff report.
Moved by Bridgette Moore; seconded by Joseph Morabito to Adopt Resolution No. 2022 – 43, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AN ELECTION TO SUBMIT TO THE
QUALIFIED ELECTORS THE QUESTION OF LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN
THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-1 (SERVICES)
Motion Passed: 5- 0
Voting For: Ben J Benoit, Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore, Dustin Nigg
Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
Moved by Bridgette Moore; seconded by Joseph Morabito to Adopt Resolution No. 2022 – 44, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ELECTION RESULTS FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2022-1 (SERVICES) (ANNEXATION NO. 1)
Motion Passed: 5- 0 76
Voting For: Ben J Benoit, Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore, Dustin Nigg
Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
2.3 County Service Area Charges for FY 2022 -23
Senior Engineer Farag presented the staff report.
Moved by Ashlee DePhillippo; seconded by Bridgette Moore to Adopt Resolution No. 2022 – 45, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING COUNTY SERVICE AREA CHARGES WITHIN THE CITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Motion Passed: 5- 0
Voting For: Ben J Benoit, Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore, Dustin Nigg
Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
2.4 Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 1-Consolidated & Street Lighting Zones
Senior Engineer Farag presented the staff report.
Moved by Bridgette Moore; seconded by Joseph Morabito to Adopt Resolution No. 2022 – 46, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT
FOR ALL ZONES, OF LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR AND LEVYING
ASSESSMENTS ON ALL LOTS AND PARCELS OF LAND THEREIN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23; AND AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Motion Passed: 5- 0
Voting For: Ben J Benoit, Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore, Dustin Nigg
Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
3. GENERAL BUSINESS
3.1 FY 2021/22 4th Quarter Budget Report
Administrative Analyst II Jantz presented the Staff report.
Moved by Bridgette Moore; seconded by Ashlee DePhillippo to Adopt Resolution No. 2022 – 47, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AMENDMENTS TO THE FY 2021-22
BUDGETED REVENUES AND EXPENSES
Motion Passed: 5- 0
77 Voting For: Ben J Benoit, Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore, Dustin Nigg
Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
3.2 Assembly Bill 43 Update - Setting Speed Limits
Senior Engineer Farag presented the staff report.
Received and filed the update for Assembly Bill 43 regarding the setting of speed limits.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
1. New agenda software has been launched.
2. Visit city website for all upcoming events
3. Nomination period starts July 18, 2022. For questions contact the city clerk.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None added.
ADJOURN THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
There being no further business Mayor Benoit adjourned the meeting at 7:48 pm in memory of resident George Taylor.
Submitted by: Approved by:
______________________________ ______________________________ Janet Morales, CMC Ben J. Benoit
City Clerk Mayor
78 CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.3
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
Warrant Register August 2022
SUBMITTED BY:
Robert
Howell, Administrative Services
PREPARED BY:
Nicholas Neidiffer, Accounting Specialist
ACTION:
Approve the following:
For Fiscal Year 2021/2022
1. Warrant Register dated 08-04-2022 in the amount of $389,691.53.
2. Warrant Register dated 08-11-2022 in the amount of $1,139,300.36.
3. Warrant Register dated 08-17-2022 in the amount of $104,042.08.
4. Warrant Register dated 08-25-2022 in the amount of $327,123.02.
For Fiscal Year 2022/2023
1. Warrant Register dated 08-04-2022 in the amount of $69,106.50.
2. Warrant Register dated 08-11-2022 in the amount of $211,121.83.
3. Warrant Register dated 08-17-2022 in the amount of $37,116.19.
4. Warrant Register dated 08-25-2022 in the amount of $18,954.24.
5. Wire Transfer Register dated 08-31-2022 in the amount of $59,447.57.
6. Payroll Register dated 09-01-2022 in the amount of $315,781.81.
DISCUSSION:
The City of Wildomar requires that the City Council audit payments of demands and direct the City Manager to issue checks. The Warrant and Payroll Registers are submitted for approval.
FISCAL IMPACT:
These Warrant, Wire Transfer and Payroll Registers will have a budgetary impact in the amount and fiscal year noted in the recommendation section of this report. These costs are included in the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Budgets.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Warrant Reg Aug 2022 Voucher Listings
79 80
08/04/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 8:05:01PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215335 8/4/2022 000081 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS, COMMISSION80322A APRIL 2021-JUNE 2021 CA BLDG STDRD ADMIN
484.20
270.90JULY 2021-SEPT 2021 CA BLDG STDRD
ADMIN
80322B
1,350.90OCT 2021-DEC 2021 CA BLDG STDRD
ADMIN RE
80322C
1,020.60JAN 2022-MAR 2022 CA BLDG STDRD
ADMIN RE
80322D
Total : 3,126.60
215336 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON CA#700204787151 05/14/21-06/13/22 ELECTRIC 75,495.05 S -30,355.38CREDIT CFD 2013-001 ZONE 5CR30222-9127
Total : 45,139.67
215337 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 6302022-9129 02/22/22-06/27/22 ELECTRIC 2,556.66 Total : 2,556.66
215338 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 6152022-3047 06/15/21-06/15/22 34311 MISSION TRAIL TC 984.06 Total : 984.06
215339 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 6152022-5361 06/15/21-06/14/22 ELECTRIC 31818
CENTRAL
874.52
Total : 874.52
215340 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 6152022-7372 06/15/21-06/14/22 ELECTRIC 24211 CLINTON 795.07 Total : 795.07
215341 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 6272022-7258 02/27/22-06/27/22 ELECTRIC - 21400 PALOM 721.23 Total : 721.23
215342 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 6302022-3487 02/11/22-06/13/22 ELECTRIC - 23873 CLINT 613.36 Total : 613.36
215343 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 1202022-8688 06/15/2021-7/14/2021 21458 GRAND AVE TC1
482.07
76.1101/14/2022-02/14/2022 21458 GRAND AVE
TC
2142022-8688
75.112/14/2022-3/14/2022 21458 GRAND AVE TC13162022-8688
74.523/16/2022-4/13/2022 21458 GRAND AVE TC14142022-8688
81.234/14/2022-5/15/2022 21458 GRAND AVE TC15162022-8688 81 08/04/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
2 8:05:01PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215343 8/4/2022 (Continued)000022 EDISON
75.515/16/2022-6/14/2022 21458 GRAND AVE TC16142022-8688 Total : 864.55
215344 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 6152022-3950 06/15/21-06/14/22 ELECTRIC 34311 MISSION 319.15 Total : 319.15
215345 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 3152022-3123 02/11/22-03/14/22 ELECTRIC 23873 CLINTON 205.35 133.4403/15/22-04/12/22 ELECTRIC 23873
CLINTON
4132022-3123
223.8904/13/22-05/12/22 ELECTRIC 23873
CLINTON
5132022-3123
303.3005/13/22-06/13/22 ELECTRIC 23873
CLINTON
6142022-3123
Total : 865.98
215346 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 3142022-7255 02/11/22-03/14/22 ELECTRIC 23873 CLINTON 109.17
73.0803/15/22-04/12/22 ELECTRIC 23873
CLINTON
4132022-7255
146.2204/13/22-05/12/22 ELECTRIC 23873
CLINTON
5132022-7255
213.9005/13/22-06/13/22 ELECTRIC 23873
CLINTON
6142022-7255
Total : 542.37
215347 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 1202022-3243 06/15/21-01/13/22 ELECTRIC 31818
CENTRAL
208.30
31.4401/14/22-02/13/22 ELECTRIC 31818
CENTRAL
2142022-3243
30.3402/14/22-03/15/22 ELECTRIC 31818
CENTRAL
3162022-3243
29.5303/16/22-04/13/22 ELECTRIC 31818
CENTRAL
4142022-3243
28.9104/14/22-05/15/22 ELECTRIC 31818
CENTRAL
5162022-3243
27.2705/16/22-06/14/22 ELECTRIC 31818
CENTRAL
60152022-3243
Total : 355.79
215348 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 06282022-6091 05/27/22-06/27/22 LITTLE LEAGUE 21347 CO 104.03 82 08/04/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
3 8:05:01PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215348 8/4/2022 (Continued)000022 EDISON
46.57PREV-11/28/21 ELECTRIC LITTLE LEAGUE
213
11292021-6091
42.9611/29/21-12/27/21 ELECTRIC LITTLE
LEAGUE
12282021-6091
44.7712/28/21-01/26/22 ELECTRIC LITTLE
LEAGUE
1272022-6091
49.2101/27/22-02/27/22 ELECTRIC LITTLE
LEAGUE
2282022-6091
52.5002/28/22-03/28/22 ELECTRIC LITTLE
LEAGUE
3292022-6091
0.0303/29/22-04/27/22 ELECTRIC LITTLE
LEAGUE
4282022-6091
67.2004/28/22-05/27/22 ELECTRIC LITTLE
LEAGUE
5272022-6091
Total : 407.27
215349 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 3182022-7633 02/16/22-03/17/22 ELECTRIC - 32975 WILLO 78.89
87.1103/18/22-04/18/22 ELECTRIC - 32975 WILLO4192022-7633
79.4004/19/22-05/17/22 ELECTRIC - 32975 WILLO5182022-7633
84.9205/18/22-06/16/22 ELECTRIC - 32975 WILLO6172022-7633 Total : 330.32
215350 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 4022022-4487 03/01/22-03/31/22 ELECTRIC 20505
PALOMAR
46.96 46.9804/01/22-04/30/22 ELECTRIC 20505
PALOMAR
5022022-4487
46.9905/01/22-05/31/22 ELECTRIC 20505
PALOMAR
6022022-4487
48.3706/01/22-06/30/22 ELECTRIC 20505
PALOMAR
7012022-4487
Total : 189.30
215351 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 3182022-5249 02/16/22-03/17/22 ELECTRIC 32975 WILLOW 30.59
31.1203/18/22-04/18/22 ELECTRIC 32975 WILLOW4192022-5249
27.7304/19/22-05/17/22 ELECTRIC 32975 WILLOW5182022-5249
28.2605/18/22-06/16/22 ELECTRIC 32975 WILLOW6172022-5249 Total : 117.70
215352 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 3182022-3767 02/16/22-03/17/22 ELECTRIC 31160 CLINTON 11.98
12.1603/18/22-04/18/22 ELECTRIC 31160 CLINTON4182022-3767 83 08/04/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
4 8:05:01PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215352 8/4/2022 (Continued)000022 EDISON
12.1604/19/22-05/18/22 ELECTRIC 31160 CLINTON5182022-3767
12.5805/18/22-06/16/22 ELECTRIC 31160 CLINTON6172022-3767 Total : 48.88
215353 8/4/2022 001742 MARSHACK HAYS LLP 13988 WESTERN COMMUNITY ENERGY THROUGH 04/30/2
466.03
357.41WESTERN COMMUNITY ENERGY
THROUGH 05/31/2
14105
Total : 823.44
215354 8/4/2022 000856 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL IN 1149327 CONTRACTUAL SVCS P/E MAY 1, 2022 19,500.00 9,902.50CONTRACTUAL SVCS P/E MAY 22, 2022 -
PROJ
1150968
14,175.00CONTRACTUAL SVCS P/E JUNE 30, 2022 -
PRO
1153530
Total : 43,577.50
215355 8/4/2022 001107 PLACEWORKS 78828 JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - CIP 028-1 472.50 38,564.94JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - GP
UPDATE/EI
78923
285.00JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - PROJECT
RELA
79018
1,124.98JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - PROJECT
RELA
79019
285.00JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - PROJECT
RELA
79020
265.72JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - PROJECT
RELA
79021
1,472.50JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - PROJECT
RELA
79022
157.50JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - PROJECT
RELA
79023
126.00JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - PROJECT
RELA
79024
157.50JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - PROJECT
RELA
79025
Total : 42,911.64
215356 8/4/2022 000444 R3 CONSULTING GROUP 117317 PROF SERVICES THROUGH 06/01/22 7,920.00 84 08/04/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
5 8:05:01PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 7,920.00 215356 8/4/2022 000444 000444 R3 CONSULTING GROUP 215357 8/4/2022 000378 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & SUPPLY 619507 FACILITY MATERIAL 46.61 Total : 46.61
215358 8/4/2022 000131 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, RCA 80322A REVISED OCT 2021 MSHCP MITICATION FEES
50,600.00
107,343.28REVISED DEC 2021 MSHCP MITICATION
FEES
80322B
77,616.58JUNE 2022 MSHCP MITICATION FEES /
ADU'S
80322C
Total : 235,559.86
Bank total : 389,691.53 24 Vouchers for bank code : wf 389,691.53Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 24
85 08/11/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 4:09:07PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215396 8/11/2022 000240 ALWAYS RELIABLE BACKFLOW 7722 0000407 ANNUAL BACKFLOW DEVICE TESTING - 24 DEVI
720.00
Total : 720.00
215397 8/11/2022 000034 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 43087 RC SHERIFF - LAB SERVICES 425.00 727.00RC SHERIFF - LAB SERVICES43088
138.00RC SHERIFF - LAB SERVICES43137
Total : 1,290.00
215398 8/11/2022 001694 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 120054322 JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVCS 796.00 Total : 796.00
215399 8/11/2022 001429 DANIEL PEST CONTROL 22-2371 JUNE 2022 PEST CONTROL - MARNA OBRIEN
300.00
200.00JUNE 2022 PEST CONTROL - REGENCY
HERITAG
22-2372
Total : 500.00
215400 8/11/2022 000072 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP 77569 MARCH 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - CIP - 29,068.15 85,607.63MARCH 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC -77585
29,503.62APRIL 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - CIP -78217
70,329.44APRIL 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC -78736
Total : 214,508.84
215401 8/11/2022 001667 OLDCASTLE INFRASTRUCTURE INC 500037492 0000374 CATCH BASIN INSERT MAINTENANCE - ZONE 52
427.50
0000374 1,026.00CATCH BASIN INSERT MAINTENANCE -
ZONE 52
500037496
0000374 2,223.00CATCH BASIN INSERT MAINTENANCE -
ZONE 52
500037497
Total : 3,676.50
215402 8/11/2022 000047 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENTSH0000041060 CONTRACT LAW ENFORCEMENT THROUGH 04/06/2
437,686.66
451,488.56CONTRACT LAW ENFORCEMENT
THROUGH 06/30/2
SH0000041577
Total : 889,175.22
215403 8/11/2022 001306 SOCIAL WORK ACTION GROUP 6302022 0000350 FACILITATE & LEAD THE OVERALL SCOPE OF H
15,840.00
86 08/11/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
2 4:09:07PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215403 8/11/2022 (Continued)001306 SOCIAL WORK ACTION GROUP 0000386 12,275.83SWAG PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE
HOUSING (PSH)
63022
Total : 28,115.83
215404 8/11/2022 001505 THE ENDEAVOR PRODUCTION, GROUP 1020 JUNE 2022 MAYOR MINUTE 500.00 Total : 500.00
215405 8/11/2022 000006 WELLS FARGO PAYMENT REMITTANCE, CENTER62922 NEWSPAPER MEMBERSHIP 17.97 Total : 17.97
Bank total : 1,139,300.36 10 Vouchers for bank code : wf 1,139,300.36Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 10
87 08/17/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 4:50:25PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215428 8/17/2022 000080 BURKE, WILLIAMS AND SORENSON,, LLP 285951 MAY 2022 LEGAL FEES 44,495.57 Total : 44,495.57
215429 8/17/2022 000081 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS, COMMISSION81522 APR 2022 - JUN 2022 CA BLDG STANDARDS AD
1,800.00
Total : 1,800.00
215430 8/17/2022 000037 DATA TICKET, INC. 139710 JUNE 2022 ONLINE/SSN CITATION
PROCESSING
258.48
561.93JUNE 2022 DAILY CITE PROCESSING140396
Total : 820.41
215431 8/17/2022 000082 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION, DIVISION OF ADMIN SERVICE81522 APRIL 2022 - JUNE 2022 SMIP FEES 4,865.15 Total : 4,865.15
215432 8/17/2022 000054 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SL221437 APRIL 2022 - JUNE 2022 SIGNALS &
LIGHTIN
3,462.23
Total : 3,462.23
215433 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 7012022-4293 03/01/22-06/30/22 ELECTRIC 21,543.92 Total : 21,543.92
215434 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 6292022-2458 05/18/22-06/28/22 ELECTRIC 2,725.60 Total : 2,725.60
215435 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 6142022-8408 05/13/22-06/13/22 35711 CAPISTRANO ST CF
19.55 Total : 19.55
215436 8/17/2022 000941 FRONTIER 70122A OFFICE TELEPHONE CHARGES 2,989.57 223.08OFFICE TELEPHONE CHARGES70122B
Total : 3,212.65
215437 8/17/2022 001783 HR DYNAMICS & PERFORMANCE, MANAGEMENT INC42922 02/10/22-04/29/22 AMENDED SCOPE OF WORK
13,000.00
Total : 13,000.00
215438 8/17/2022 001742 MARSHACK HAYS LLP 14174 WESTERN COMMUNITY ENERGY THROUGH 6/30/22
77.00 88
08/17/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
2 4:50:25PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 77.00 215438 8/17/2022 001742 001742 MARSHACK HAYS LLP 215439 8/17/2022 001210 MURRIETA/WILDOMAR CHAMBER, OF COMMERCE40090 NETWORKING BREAKFAST (DAN YORK) 20.00 Total : 20.00
215440 8/17/2022 001752 THOMAS ELECTRICAL CONTRACTING 21384 MARNA O'BRIEN PARK MISC. REPAIR 300.00 Total : 300.00
215441 8/17/2022 001773 VIVIFY PAINTING 445 0000404 FIRE STATION 61 EXTERIOR PAIINTING AS PE
7,700.00
Total : 7,700.00
Bank total : 104,042.08 14 Vouchers for bank code : wf 104,042.08Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 14
89 08/25/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 12:46:35PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215476 8/25/2022 001731 AVENU INSIGHTS & ANALYTICS INV06-014766 SALES & USE TAX REPORT SYST STARS SVC 1S
519.99
Total : 519.99
215477 8/25/2022 001684 CABLEGUYS CORPORATION 483242 0000394 SECURITY CAMERA INSTALL AT MARNA
O'BRIEN
10,694.25
0000394 6,647.38SECURITY CAMERA INSTALL AT CEMETERY483243 Total : 17,341.63
215478 8/25/2022 001678 CALIFORNIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL, RISK AUTHORITY (CIRA)INV-1637 CIRA WORK COMP DEDUCT QTR 6-30-22 7.13 Total : 7.13
215479 8/25/2022 001300 DELL MARKETING L.P. 10591478272 0000396 TWO DELL LATITUDE 5520 LAPTOPS W/ TWO DE
5,723.64
Total : 5,723.64
215480 8/25/2022 001325 GEOCON WEST, INC. 722070408 CIP 026-1 THROUGH 07/10/22 1,147.75 Total : 1,147.75
215481 8/25/2022 000072 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP 79464 MAY 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - CIP - 32,070.08 63,379.38MAY 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC -79465
74,300.38JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC -80370
27,557.50JUNE 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVC - CIP -80371
Total : 197,307.34
215482 8/25/2022 000836 KOA CORPORATION JB93120-20 PROF. SVC. 05/02/22-05/29/22 WILDOMAR SS
2,687.00
8,231.00PROF. SVC. 05/30/22-06/26/22 WILDOMAR
SS
JB93120-21
Total : 10,918.00
215483 8/25/2022 000289 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF, TECHNICAL SERVICES BUREAUSH0000040850 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF-
COMMUNICATION
39,710.00
Total : 39,710.00
215484 8/25/2022 001021 SPICER CONSULTING GROUP 1072 FY 21/22 ANNUAL ADMIN LLMD89-1-C/CSA 22/
2,791.67
5,000.00CFD 2022-1 FORMATION VILLA SIENA
BACARA
1079
90 08/25/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
2 12:46:35PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 7,791.67 215484 8/25/2022 001021 001021 SPICER CONSULTING GROUP 215485 8/25/2022 001571 THE OFFICE FURNITURE EXPERT INV-11137 OFFICE FURNITURE 1,609.50 Total : 1,609.50
215486 8/25/2022 000918 TKE ENGINEERING INC 2021-959 09/01/21-10/31/21 CONTRACTUAL SERVICE 783.00 2,185.0003/01/22-03/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-255
806.0004/01/22-04/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-393
1,545.0004/01/22-04/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-395
822.0004/01/22-04/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-396
1,113.0004/01/22-04/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-397
562.0004/01/22-04/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-398
1,373.0004/01/22-04/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-399
195.0004/01/22-04/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-400
325.0004/01/22-04/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-401
1,466.5004/01/22-04/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-402
2,860.0005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-491
315.0005/01/22-06/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-493
2,246.5005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-495
455.0005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-496
2,442.0005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-497
1,381.0005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-498
3,648.0005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-499
260.0005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-500
91 08/25/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
3 12:46:35PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215486 8/25/2022 (Continued)000918 TKE ENGINEERING INC 2,153.0005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-501
2,673.0005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-502
325.0005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-503
296.5005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-504
702.8705/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-505
884.5005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-506
195.0005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-507
378.0006/01/22-06/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-572
7,096.0006/01/22-06/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-648
195.0006/01/22-06/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-649
325.0006/01/22-06/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-650
325.0006/01/22-06/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-651
856.5005/01/22-06/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-652
130.0006/01/22-06/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-653
424.0005/01/22-06/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-654
195.0006/01/22-06/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-655
2,447.0006/01/22-06/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-657
Total : 44,384.37
215487 8/25/2022 000918 TKE ENGINEERING INC 2022-22 12/26/21-01/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
52.50 52.5012/26/21-01/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-23
92 08/25/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
4 12:46:35PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215487 8/25/2022 (Continued)000918 TKE ENGINEERING INC
52.5012/26/21-01/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-24
52.5001/02/22-01/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-25
70.0004/01/22-04/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-392
126.0010/01/21-04/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-394
126.0005/01/22-05/31/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-494
130.0006/01/22-06/30/22 CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
2022-656
Total : 662.00
Bank total : 327,123.02 12 Vouchers for bank code : wf 327,123.02Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 12
93 08/04/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 8:32:52PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215361 8/4/2022 000088 ACE HARDWARE 306699/3 HERITAGE FACILITIES MATERIAL 28.91 143.12STRIPPING PNT IC WHITE SB, NATIONAL
NIGH
306728/3
14.01MARNA FACILITIES MATERIAL306738/3
Total : 186.04
215362 8/4/2022 000029 APPLEONE 01-6378180 ADMIN W/E 07/23/22 944.64 Total : 944.64
215363 8/4/2022 001712 BREWEN'S EMPIRE TROLLEY 220802 0000410 SHUTTLE SERVICES FOR NATIONAL NIGHT OUT
1,785.00
Total : 1,785.00
215364 8/4/2022 000493 COAST RECREATION, INC. 14614 MARNA FACILITIES MATERIAL 388.61 Total : 388.61
215365 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON FY2022/23-7151 6/14/2022-7/13/2022 ELECTRIC 9,223.69 Total : 9,223.69
215366 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7282022-9129 06/22/22-07/21/22 ELECTRIC 1,208.71 Total : 1,208.71
215367 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7142022-3123 06/14/22-07/13/22 23873 CLINTON KEITH RO 356.63 Total : 356.63
215368 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7142022-3487 06/14/22-07/13/22 ELECTRIC - 23873 CLINT 292.34 Total : 292.34
215369 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7142022-7255 06/14/22-07/13/22 23873 CLINTON KEITH RO 276.34 Total : 276.34
215370 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7282022-7258 06/28/22-07/27/22 ELECTRIC - 21400 PALOM 262.28 Total : 262.28
215371 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7282022-6091 06/27/22-07/28/22 ELECTRIC LITTLE LEAGUE
108.14
Total : 108.14
215372 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7192022-7633 06/17/22-07/18/22 ELECTRIC 32975 WILLOW 88.78 94 08/04/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
2 8:32:52PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 88.78 215372 8/4/2022 000022 000022 EDISON 215373 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7142022-3047 06/15/22-07/14/22 34311 MISSION TRAIL TC 82.99 Total : 82.99
215374 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7152022-5361 06/15/22-07/14/22 31818 CENTRAL TC1 77.54 Total : 77.54
215375 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7152022-8688 6/15/2022-7/15/2022 21458 GRAND AVE TC1 75.05 Total : 75.05
215376 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7152022-7372 06/15/22-07/14/22 24211 CLINTON KEITH RD 68.36 Total : 68.36
215377 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 8012022-4487 07/01/22-07/31/22 ELECTRIC 20505
PALOMAR
48.07 Total : 48.07
215378 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7192022-5249 06/17/22-07/18/22 ELECTRIC 32975 WILLOW 28.28 Total : 28.28
215379 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7152022-3243 06/15/22-07/14/22 ELECTRIC 31818
CENTRAL
26.71 Total : 26.71
215380 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7142022-3950 06/15/22-07/14/22 34311 MISSION TRAIL LS 24.67 Total : 24.67
215381 8/4/2022 000022 EDISON 7192022-3767 06/14/22-07/13/22 31160 CLINTON KEITH RD 12.44 Total : 12.44
215382 8/4/2022 001762 EMERGENCY-1 RESPONSE, INC. 1730 CITY 14TH BIRTHDAY CELEBRATION 134.00 Total : 134.00
215383 8/4/2022 001664 EXPRESS EVENTS 80622 MOVIE IN THE PARK 8/6/2022-INTERACTIVE G
395.00
Total : 395.00
215384 8/4/2022 001222 FOBRO CONSULTING LLC 141 07/01/22-07/31/11 ACCOUNTING
CONTRACTUAL
6,201.25
95 08/04/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
3 8:32:52PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 6,201.25 215384 8/4/2022 001222 001222 FOBRO CONSULTING LLC 215385 8/4/2022 000941 FRONTIER 72222 07/22/22-08/21/22 FIOS INTERNET
CHARGES
175.98
Total : 175.98
215386 8/4/2022 000634 HEYDAY RECORDS AND EVENTS 71322 NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 8/2/22 STAGE RENTAL
600.00
Total : 600.00
215387 8/4/2022 000647 JOLLY JUMPS 70922 CITY BIRTHDAY 1,000.00 1,470.00NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 8/2/2022
-CRAFT,JUMPE
80222
Total : 2,470.00
215388 8/4/2022 001805 LECHAROEN, CHRIS 8122 NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 8/2/22-DJ SERVICES 300.00 Total : 300.00
215389 8/4/2022 001398 LUNA, CAMERON 80122 07/16/22-07/29/22 MILEAGE
REIMBURSEMENT
10.00 Total : 10.00
215390 8/4/2022 001046 MUNICIPAL CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC80122 07/01/22-07/28/22 - PROJECT CONSULTANT 5,390.00 Total : 5,390.00
215391 8/4/2022 000071 PURCHASE POWER (PITNEY BOWES) 72822 POSTAGE AND SUPPLIES POSTAGE METER REFIL
184.85
Total : 184.85
215392 8/4/2022 000186 RIGHTWAY 7622 FACILITY RENTAL 7/04/22-7/31/22 (2) REST 411.25 Total : 411.25
215393 8/4/2022 000047 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENTSH0000041570 RIVERSIDE CAL-ID FY 22/23 MEMBER AGENCY
37,013.00
Total : 37,013.00
215394 8/4/2022 001732 ROSALES, ANNELLE 80122 07/16/22-07/29/22 MILEAGE
REIMBURSEMENT
6.31 Total : 6.31
215395 8/4/2022 000790 SPARKLETTS 14346613-072322 CITY HALL DRINKING WATER THROUGH 7/12/22
249.55
96 08/04/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
4 8:32:52PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 249.55 215395 8/4/2022 000790 000790 SPARKLETTS Bank total : 69,106.50 35 Vouchers for bank code : wf
69,106.50Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 35
97 08/11/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 4:10:06PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215406 8/11/2022 000007 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEY,, INC. JUL.2022 JULY 2022 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICE 7,000.00 Total : 7,000.00
215407 8/11/2022 000029 APPLEONE 01-6384277 ADMIN W/E 07/30/22 708.48 Total : 708.48
215408 8/11/2022 000012 ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL, WATER DISTRICT11797022 06/09/22-07/09/22 WATER ZONE 52 LOC 01 148.55
46.2606/09/22-07/09/22 WATER ZONE 29 LOC 0211797078
252.8606/09/22-07/09/22 WATER ZONE 71 LOC 0111797361
165.5506/09/22-07/09/22 WATER 32637 GRUWELL -11797559
6,306.8706/09/22-07/09/22 WATER MARNA OBRIEN11797640
74.1506/12/22-07/12/22 WATER ZONE 3 LOC 7 M111802328
180.9206/12/22-07/12/22 WATER HERITAGE PARK
(A
11802341
952.9806/13/22-07/13/22 WATER ZONE 3 LOC 25
M1
11805561
1,521.4006/13/22-07/13/22 WATER ZONE 3 LOC 25
M2
11805562
762.3506/13/22-07/13/22 WATER ZONE 3 LOC 24
M1
11807337
269.5006/13/22-07/13/22 WATER CFD 2013-1 ZONE11808507
174.2106/19/22-07/19/22 WATER ZONE 3 LOC 23
M1
11815684
54.4706/19/22-07/19/22 WATER ZONE 30 LOC 211815894
78.9006/19/22-07/19/22 WATER ZONE 3 LOC 49
M1
11815934
182.2806/19/22-07/19/22 WATER ZONE 51 LOC 111816187
224.0306/19/22-07/19/22 WATER BASEBALL FIELD11816351
606.0606/19/22-07/19/22 WATER WINDSONG PARK11816391
523.5706/19/22-07/19/22 WATER ZONE 3 LOC 29
M1
11816899
224.8206/19/22-07/19/22 WATER ZONE 3 LOC 29
M2
11816977
253.4006/19/22-07/19/22 WATER ZONE 30 LOC 111816980
266.7006/19/22-07/19/22 WATER ZONE 3 LOC 42 &11817079
201.0206/19/22-07/19/22 WATER 22450 1/2
CERVER
11817476
182.4906/19/22-07/19/22 WATER 22450 CERVERA11817718
194.0706/19/22-07/19/22 WATER ZONE 62 - 2293311818812
98 08/11/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
2 4:10:06PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215408 8/11/2022 (Continued)000012 ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL, WATER DISTRICT
83.6906/19/22-07/19/22 WATER ZONE 67 -
ARNNET
11818899
Total : 13,931.10
215409 8/11/2022 000685 GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVIC 32050431 CANON COLOR COPIER SYST. #003-1765784
214.24
Total : 214.24
215410 8/11/2022 000016 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS 242535 07/01/22-07/31/22 CONTRACT COPIER SVC MA
921.80
Total : 921.80
215411 8/11/2022 000070 LAKE ELSINORE AND SAN JACINTO, WATERSHEDS AUTHORITYTMDL-12 FY 22/23 TMDL TASK FORCE
CONTRIBUTION
32,376.00
Total : 32,376.00
215412 8/11/2022 001657 LIFE STORAGE 82522 RENTAL 10X10 STORAGE UIT GROUND
FLOOR -
215.00
Total : 215.00
215413 8/11/2022 001555 NBS 202208-1616 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THROUGH 07/31/22
1,190.00
Total : 1,190.00
215414 8/11/2022 000042 PV MAINTENANCE, INC. 005-257 JULY 2022 CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE
CONTRACTU
65,415.03
Total : 65,415.03
215415 8/11/2022 000149 RIVERSIDE COUNTY EXECUTIVE, OFFICE2023-01WIL JULY-SEPT 2022 ANIMAL SHELTER
SHELTERING
72,351.00
Total : 72,351.00
215416 8/11/2022 001807 ROGERS, ANDERSON, MALODY &, SCOTT LLP71097 JULY 2022 FOR FY 21/22 14,100.00 Total : 14,100.00
215417 8/11/2022 001806 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS, GROUP 11549448-2 PUBLIC NOTICE 630.24 Total : 630.24
215418 8/11/2022 001258 SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. 128955383 NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 294.38 Total : 294.38
99 08/11/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
3 4:10:06PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215419 8/11/2022 001505 THE ENDEAVOR PRODUCTION, GROUP 1026 JULY 2022 MAYOR MINUTE 500.00 Total : 500.00
215420 8/11/2022 000437 VERIZON WIRELESS 9911737747 07/23/22-08/22/22 DATA INTERNET CHARGE 858.54
76.0207/23/22-08/22/22 DATA INTERNET CHARGETEMPLATE-2
Total : 934.56
215421 8/11/2022 000006 WELLS FARGO PAYMENT REMITTANCE, CENTER70122 VIDEO HOSTING SOFTWARE 250.00 Total : 250.00
215422 8/11/2022 000006 WELLS FARGO PAYMENT REMITTANCE, CENTER71622 MARKETING PLATFORM SUBSCRIPTION 90.00 Total : 90.00
Bank total : 211,121.83 17 Vouchers for bank code : wf 211,121.83Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 17
100
08/17/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 4:51:08PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215442 8/17/2022 000029 APPLEONE 01-6392098 ADMIN W/E 08/06/22 708.48 Total : 708.48
215443 8/17/2022 001002 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 29915 06/25/22-07/24/22 PLAN CHECK SVC 468.75 343.7506/25/22-07/24/22 PLAN CHECK SVC - 3RD P29916
187.5006/25/22-07/24/22 PLAN CHECK SVC - 3RD P29917
312.5006/25/22-07/24/22 PLAN CHECK SVC - 3RD P29918
125.0006/25/22-07/24/22 PLAN CHECK SVC - 1ST P29919
125.0006/25/22-07/24/22 PLAN CHECK SVC - 2ND P29920
863.9806/25/22-07/24/22 PLAN CHECK SVC - SI FI29922
375.0006/25/22-07/24/22 PLAN CHECK SVC - 2ND P29923
Total : 2,801.48
215444 8/17/2022 000299 AUDITOR CONTROLLER GAD- LAFCO AC0000001928 LAFCO FEES FY 22/23 2,413.56 Total : 2,413.56
215445 8/17/2022 000787 CA ASSOC OF CODE ENFORCEMENT 20000022209 CCEO APPLICATION FEE 200.00 Total : 200.00
215446 8/17/2022 001748 CALIFORNIA CONSULTING, INC. 5256 0000412 GRANT WRITING SERVICES FY 22/23 4,850.00 0000412 4,850.00GRANT WRITING SERVICES FY 22/235323
Total : 9,700.00
215447 8/17/2022 001761 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 2318080822 CABLE THROUGH 07/08/22 - FS61 10.68 Total : 10.68
215448 8/17/2022 001694 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 120094279 AUGUST 2022 CONTRACTUAL SVCS 796.00 Total : 796.00
215449 8/17/2022 001799 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PUBLIC, SAFETY ENTERPRISE COMMUNIPE0000000471 MONTHLY RADIO COMMUNICATION 155.34 Total : 155.34
215450 8/17/2022 000011 CR&R INC. 2978 07/01/22-07/31/22 STREET SWEEPER & BIKE
603.08
1,371.6507/09,21,26/22 DUMP 40YD BOX &
DISPOSAL
350260
248.318/01/22 3 YD BOX, 90G RECYCLE -
BASEBALL
350283
101
08/17/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
2 4:51:08PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215450 8/17/2022 (Continued)000011 CR&R INC.
287.5808/01/22 3YD BOX, 90 RECYCLE 60LG
GRN-FS
350340
Total : 2,510.62
215451 8/17/2022 000002 CRYSTAL CLEAN MAINTENANCE 803M JANITORIAL SERVICES-CITY HALL AUGUST 202
3,214.75
Total : 3,214.75
215452 8/17/2022 001338 DEANZA TERMITE & PEST CONTROL, INC610384A PEST CONTROL MARNA (08/15/22) 75.00 Total : 75.00
215453 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 7292022-2458 06/10/22-07/28/22 ELECTRIC 467.78 Total : 467.78
215454 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 80122-7481 06/14/22-07/13/22 ELECTRIC 432.40
4.4607/01/22-07/31/22 CFD ZONE 380122-7694
Total : 436.86
215455 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 81222-3123 07/14/22-08/11/22 23873 CLINTON KEITH RD 356.73 Total : 356.73
215456 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 81222-3487 07/14/22-08/11/22 23873 CLINTON KEITH RD 319.07 Total : 319.07
215457 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 81222-7255 07/14/22-08/11/22 23873 CLINTON KEITH RD 258.73 Total : 258.73
215458 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 7922-7151 07/14/22-07/28/22 ELECTRIC 55.44 Total : 55.44
215459 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 80122-7504 07/01/22-07/31/22 CFD 2013-1
ORANGE/CORR
41.18 Total : 41.18
215460 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 7142022-8408 06/14/22-07/13/22 35711 CAPISTRANO ST CF
19.83 Total : 19.83
215461 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 80122-8975 07/01/22-07/31/22 CFD ZONE 3 10.55 102
08/17/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
3 4:51:08PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) Total : 10.55 215461 8/17/2022 000022 000022 EDISON 215462 8/17/2022 000022 EDISON 80122-4845 07/01/22-07/31/22 CFD ZONE 2 2.09 Total : 2.09
215463 8/17/2022 001762 EMERGENCY-1 RESPONSE, INC. 1804 NATIONAL NIGHT OUT EMT SERVICES 297.50 Total : 297.50
215464 8/17/2022 001747 FARAG, JASON 81522 07/30/22-08/12/22 MILEAGE REIMBURSE 19.51 Total : 19.51
215465 8/17/2022 000685 GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVIC 32189504 CANNON COLOR COPIER SYST. #015-1472515
359.97
214.24CANON COLOR COPIER SYST.
#016-1585799
32205436
Total : 574.21
215466 8/17/2022 001666 INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES 721 0000414 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT
SERVICES
8,000.00
0000415 2,000.00GIS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
$2000/MONTH
764
Total : 10,000.00
215467 8/17/2022 001398 LUNA, CAMERON 81122 07/30/22-08/12/22 MILEAGE REIMBURSE - CI 12.50 Total : 12.50
215468 8/17/2022 001742 MARSHACK HAYS LLP 14242 WESTERN COMMUNITY ENERGY THROUGH 07/31/2
164.75
Total : 164.75
215469 8/17/2022 000185 PITNEY BOWES 80722 POSTAGE METER REFILL 07/27/22 503.50 Total : 503.50
215470 8/17/2022 001393 SOCALGAS 81222 07/12/22-08/10/22 GAS- FIRE DEPT 32637 G 52.55 Total : 52.55
215471 8/17/2022 001505 THE ENDEAVOR PRODUCTION, GROUP 1029 08/08/22 SINGLE CAMERA SHOOT 937.50 Total : 937.50
Bank total : 37,116.19 30 Vouchers for bank code : wf
103
08/17/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
4 4:51:08PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 37,116.19Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 30
104
08/25/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 12:47:11PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215488 8/25/2022 001770 AGUILAR, JANDI 82422 07/01/22-08/23/22 MILEAGE
REIMBURSEMENT
18.75 Total : 18.75
215489 8/25/2022 001627 AMERICAN EAGLE TROPHIES 8006 MEASURE AA 156.60 Total : 156.60
215490 8/25/2022 000029 APPLEONE 01-6397772 ADMIN W/E 08/13/22 944.64 Total : 944.64
215491 8/25/2022 000760 ARMADA ADMINISTRATORS 184949 AUGUST 2022 PREMIUM 11,046.00 Total : 11,046.00
215492 8/25/2022 000785 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC 82140986 JULY 2022 CODE ENFORCEMENT
SOFTWARE
170.75
Total : 170.75
215493 8/25/2022 000027 DIRECT TV 082317220X220813 08/12/22-09/11/22 CABLE SERVICES - CITY 153.99 Total : 153.99
215494 8/25/2022 000941 FRONTIER 80122A 08/01/22-08/31/22 OFFICE TELEPHONE CHARG
474.44
62.5808/01/22-08/31/22 OFFICE TELEPHONE
CHARG
80122B
Total : 537.02
215495 8/25/2022 001783 HR DYNAMICS & PERFORMANCE 82422 BANK SERVICE FEE 12.00 Total : 12.00
215496 8/25/2022 000836 KOA CORPORATION JB93120-22 06/27/22-07/31/22 WILDOMAR SSAR 2,541.00 Total : 2,541.00
215497 8/25/2022 001005 PEOPLEREADY INC 27573815 CONTRACTUAL SVC - NATIONAL NIGHT OUT
244.80
Total : 244.80
215498 8/25/2022 000186 RIGHTWAY 309335 08/18/22-09/14/22 -
PORTA/WASHSTN-WINDSO
723.50
Total : 723.50
105
08/25/2022
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
2 12:47:11PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 215499 8/25/2022 000606 RING CENTRAL CD_000447178 NEW DIGITAL LINE & MOBILE USER 550.06 Total : 550.06
215500 8/25/2022 000415 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL, & WATER CONSERVATION DISTD12221499 CIP 059 CONSTRUCTION MURRIETA VLY SHADW
1,000.00
355.13CIP 059 CONSTRUCTION MURRIETA VLY
SHADW
FC019674
Total : 1,355.13
215501 8/25/2022 001811 SUTHERLAND, DEBRA 82422 REIMBURSE CANDIDATE STATEMENT DUE TO WIT
500.00
Total : 500.00
Bank total : 18,954.24 14 Vouchers for bank code : wf
18,954.24Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 14
106
ACH Date Payee Description Amount
8/4/2022 CFT NV Developments, LLC Monthly City Hall Lease Payment 38,393.68$ 8/8/2022 Wright Express Fuel Purchases 642.28
8/15/2022 Wright Express Fuel Purchases 705.85
8/19/2022 US Bank
Business Meals, Conference Expenses,
Organizational Memberships, Special
Event Supplies, Repairs &
Maintenance, and Office Supplies
14,088.58
8/22/2022 Enterprise Fleet Management Monthly City Vehicle Lease Payment 4,940.42 8/29/2022 Viasat Inc Satellite Internet Service - Cemetery District & Parks 676.76
TOTAL 59,447.57$
City of Wildomar
Wire Transfer Register
8/31/2022
107
ACH Date Payee Description Amount
8/4/2022 Heartland Payroll 07/16/2022-07/29/2022 103,186.66 $ 8/18/2022 Heartland Payroll 07/30/2022-08/12/2022 106,645.93 $ 9/1/2022 Heartland Payroll 08/13/2022-08/26/2022 104,192.77 $ 8/1/2022 Heartland Payroll 08/01/2022-08/31/2022 1,756.45 $ TOTAL 315,781.81$
City of Wildomar
Payroll Warrant Register
9/1/2022
108
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.4
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
July 2022 Treasurers Report
SUBMITTED BY:
Robert
Howell, Administrative Services
PREPARED BY:
Adam Jantz, Senior Administrative Analyst
ACTION:
Approve the Treasurer’s Report for July 2022.
SUMMARY:
July 2022 Treasurers Report
BACKGROUND:
Attached is the Treasurer’s Report for Cash and Investments for the month of July 2022. The City utilizes both the California State Treasurer’s Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the California Asset Management Program (CAMP) for its city investments. Utilizing the two investment programs allows the City to potentially increase the interest earned on the money held.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
City Treasurers Report July 2022
109
BEGINNING + (-) ENDING
FUND ACCOUNT INSTITUTION BALANCE DEPOSITS WITHDRAWALS BALANCE RATE All All WELLS FARGO # 17,027,467.79 $ 5,983,027.50 (2,614,170.17) $ 20,396,325.12 0.000% TOTAL $ 17,027,467.79 $ 5,983,027.50 $ (2,614,170.17) $ 20,396,325.12
PERCENT
OF DAYS STATED
FUND BOOK VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE PORTFOLIO TO MAT. RATE All $ 9,696,911.07 $ 9,696,911.07 $ 9,696,911.07 100.00% 0 1.090% All $ 5,614,616.92 $ 5,614,616.92 $ 5,614,616.92 100.00% 0 1.640% TOTAL $ 15,311,527.99 $ 15,311,527.99 $ 15,311,527.99 100.00% CITY $ 35,707,853.11
(-)
+ WITHDRAWALS/
BEGINNING DEPOSITS/ SALES/ ENDING STATED
FUND BALANCE PURCHASES MATURITIES BALANCE RATE
All $ 9,678,790.35 $ 18,120.72 $ 0.00 $ 9,696,911.07 1.090% All $ 5,606,807.56 $ 7,809.36 $ 0.00 $ 5,614,616.92 1.640% TOTAL $ 15,285,597.91 $ 25,930.08 $ 0.00 $ 15,311,527.99
Robert Howell
Robert Howell
City Treasurer
Date
8/30/2022
In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, as City Treasurer for the City of Wildomar, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months, and that all investments are in compliance with the City's Statement of Investment Policy.
I also certify that this report reflects all Government Agency pooled investments and all of the City's Bank Balances.
CITY CASH
ISSUER
CALIFORNIA ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
CALIFORNIA ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
CITY INVESTMENT (Continued)
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS
ISSUER
CITY OF WILDOMAR
TREASURER'S REPORT FOR
CASH AND INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
July 2022
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENT
CITY INVESTMENT
110
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.5
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
Road Construction Updates - Public Works/Engineering
Department
SUBMITTED BY:
Jason Farag, Public Works/ Engineering
PREPARED BY:
Emily Stadnik
ACTION:
Receive and file the Road Construction Updates from the Public Works/Engineering Department
SUMMARY:
This staff report presents a summary of major roadway construction projects occurring throughout the City and status updates for each of those projects.
BACKGROUND:
The City’s Public Works and Engineering Department (Department) oversees the planning, design, construction, maintenance, and operations of City maintained improvements/infrastructure (Public Improvements).
Public Improvements are typically either constructed as a condition of Private Development Projects (PDP) or constructed as part of City Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). In both cases, the City authorizes a private contractor to work within the City right-of-way to construct the Public Improvements through an encroachment permit or a Public Works Construction Contract. Under the permit or contract, the private contractor is responsible and liable to manage and maintain their work and their construction methods to complete the Public Improvements. The permits and contracts place certain responsibilities on the private contractor and provide certain indemnification and insurance coverage to the City. To maintain the appropriate delineation of responsibilities and maintain the City’s indemnification and liability protections, the City does not direct the contractor’s work, schedule, or methods of construction except in instances that are necessary to maintain public health and safety or to make sure that construction complies with all minimum standard requirements. The City may suggest or request that a contractor consider alternative approaches, schedules, etc… but the 111
City does not direct the contractor’s work. The contractor is responsible for the entire work zone for the duration of their permit or contract, until the City accepts the improvements into the City maintained road system.
DISCUSSION:
Table 1 in Attachment A includes a summary of the current major on-going roadway construction activities throughout the City. Table 1 also includes the approximate total cost of public improvements that are being installed by each project. For private development projects, these costs represent costs that the private developer is paying that would otherwise have to be paid by the City if not constructed by the developer.
Table 2 of Attachment A includes the latest status updates for each project based on the construction schedules provided to the City by the contractors responsible for the construction of each project.
Staff has also created a webpage on the City’s website where users can check for more frequent updates regarding traffic impacts from major roadway construction projects. The webpage can be accessed by visiting the following URL:
https://www.cityofwildomar.org/community/construction_alerts
FISCAL IMPACT:
Public Improvements constructed as part of a City CIP are funded as shown in the approved City budget. Public Improvements constructed by a private development project are funded by the private developer. There is no impact to the City’s General Fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Road Const. Updates
112
Attachment A
Table 1 - Construction Project Summaries
Project No.
& Type
Primary
Roadway(s) Project Name Roadway
Segment(s) Description of Work Est. Cost of
Improvements
CIP 026-1
(City CIP)
Bundy
Canyon Rd.
Bundy Canyon
Rd.
Improvement
Project,
Segment 1
Bundy Canyon
Rd. between
Cherry St. and
1600’ east of
Oak Canyon Dr.
Widening of Bundy Canyon Rd. to 4 lanes
with two new traffic signals.
$7,647,000
CIP 059
(City CIP)
Palomar St.
Clinton
Keith Rd.
Palomar St. &
Clinton Keith Rd.
Sidewalk, Trail,
and Bike Lane
Connectivity
Project
Palomar St.
Delca Ln. to
Clinton Keith Rd.
Clinton Keith Rd.
Renaissance
Plaza to The
Shops at Clinton
Keith
Widening of Palomar St. to 4-lanes with
sidewalks, trail, and bike lanes.
Widening of CKR to three lanes eastbound
with sidewalk.
$1,500,000
P21-0012
(Private
Development
Project)
Wildomar
Trail
Baxter Village Wildomar Trail
I-15 to White
Street
Old Baxter Road
Wildomar Trail to
White Street
Margaret Lane
Wildomar Trail to
old Baxter Road
Widening of Wildomar Trail to modified
Arterial with 96’ ROW.
Construction of Margaret Lane to Local with
60’ ROW.
Construction of old Baxter Road to Local
with 60’ ROW.
Construction of RCFC Master planned SD
facilities in Wildomar Trail and old Baxter
Road.
Construction of EVMWD master planned
sewer and water facilities in Wildomar Trail.
$2,236,000
113
Attachment A
Project No.
& Type
Primary
Roadway(s) Project Name Roadway
Segment(s) Description of Work Est. Cost of
Improvements
P21-0117
(Private
Development
Project)
Prielipp Rd. Lennar,
Horizons
Bunny Trail
Elizabeth Lane
to end of project
frontage
Elizabeth Lane
Bunny Trail to
Prielipp
Prielipp
Elizabeth to
Yamas
Widening of Elizabeth Lane to a Collector
78’ROW.
Widening of Prielipp to a Secondary
100’ROW.
66” RCFC master planned SD through site
and along Elizabeth Lane and Prielipp.
EVMWD master planned sewer and water
facilities in Prielipp.
$1,900,000
P14-0093
(Private
Development
Project)
McVicar St. Beazer Homes,
Boulder Creek
McVicar
Grand to
Wildomar
Channel
Grand
Leslie to
McVicar
Palomar
Frederick
beyond Arnold
Widening of McVicar to Modified Secondary
100’ROW.
Widening of Grand to Modified Secondary
100’ROW.
Widening of Palomar to ultimate.
Construction of Master Planned RCFC
McVicar box culvert.
$3,900,000
114
Attachment A
Table 2 - Project Schedules and Updates
Project
No. Roadway Est. Project Completion Status Update
CIP 026-1 Bundy Canyon
Rd.
Winter 2022/2023 Sellers Rd.
Storm drain work has been completed. Paving of the intersection is scheduled for the week of September 12 with the intersection expected to be reopen to traffic the following week.
Monte Vista Dr.
The intersection of Monte Vista Dr. has been closed since August 22 to allow the intersection to be elevated and paved. Grading has been completed and paving is in progress. The intersection is scheduled to be reopen to traffic by September 16.
Other Project Progress
Paving activities have begun along Bundy Canyon Rd. and are expected to continue over the next month. Traffic controls will be adjusted to move traffic onto newly paved areas to allow old pavement to be removed and replaced. Traffic signal installations are expected to begin this month and continue through November.
Concrete work at various intersections is also scheduled to begin in the next month and continue through the end of October. Notices and updates will be posted to the website as specific activities are scheduled and traffic patterns change.
CIP 059 Palomar
St./Clinton Keith
Rd.
Fall/Winter 2022 Grading activities have been on-going for several weeks. Anticipated upcoming activities include continuation of grading operations and utility coordination. Utility coordination includes adjustments of water utilities, gas utilities, communication utilities, and power utilities.
Notices and updates will be posted to the website as specific activities are scheduled and traffic patterns change.
P21-0112 Wildomar Trail Winter 2022 Wildomar Trail
The first phase of road paving is expected to begin on 9/13 - lane changes and flagging will occur during this time.
Onsite Stockpile
115
Attachment A
The large onsite stockpile seen from Wildomar Trail was taken from the northern end of the project site to use as fill dirt for the southern portion. This is projected to be graded down within the next week.
P21-0117 Prielipp Rd. Fall/Winter 2022 Elizabeth Lane
Sewer and water facilities have been constructed and tied into Prielipp Road. Curb and gutter will be poured within the next two weeks.
Prielipp Road
Storm Drain headwall is currently under construction. Widening will begin as soon as the headwall is complete. The road is expected to reopen, at least partially, by the end of September.
P14-0093 McVicar St. Winter 2022/2023 Grand Avenue
The developer is currently pouring the curb and gutter. After completion, SCE can relocate the existing power poles, after which the widening work can begin.
McVicar Street
Street improvements, including base paving and curb and gutter, are complete from Grand Avenue to the RCFC box culvert. Sidewalks are currently being poured from Grand Avenue to Whispering Way. 116
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.6
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05 - 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 222
SUBMITTED BY:
Matthew Bassi, Planning
PREPARED BY:
Matthew Bassi, Planning Director
ACTION:
Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 222
- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL RULE EXEMPTION PER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES, AND APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2022-05 TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.256 AND SECTION 17.172.220 OF THE WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO TEMPORARY EVENTS AND TEMPORARY USES OF LAND IN THE CITY
OF WILDOMAR
DISCUSSION:
The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 222 at the August 10, 2022 City Council meeting for Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05. At this time, it would be appropriate for the City Council to adopt Ordinance No. 222.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance No 222
117
ATTACHMENT A
Ordinance No. 222 (for ZOA 2022-05)
118
ORDINANCE NO. 222
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL RULE
EXEMPTION PER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
GUIDELINES, AND APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT NO. 2022-05 TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.256
AND SECTION 17.172.220 OF THE WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL
CODE PERTAINING TO TEMPORARY EVENTS AND
TEMPORARY USES OF LAND IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR
WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 17.280 of the Wildomar Municipal Code and California Government Code, Section 65800, et seq., the City Council has the authority to take action on the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 6, 2022 for Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05, and adopted PC Resolution No. 2022-22 recommending City Council approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 17.280.040 of the Wildomar Municipal Code, the Planning Department, on July 29, 2022 published a legal notice in the Press Enterprise, a local newspaper of general circulation, notifying the general public of the City Council public hearing set for August 10, 2022, regarding Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 17.280.040 of the Wildomar Municipal Code, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on August 10, 2022, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05, and at which time the City Council received public testimony concerning Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR HEREBY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION.
In accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code § 21000, et seq. (“CEQA”)), a review of the potential environmental impacts was conducted by the Planning Department for Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05. Based on this review, the Planning Department has determined that the adoption of the proposed amendment (which provides for only text changes) has no potential to impact the environment. Therefore, Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05 meets the criteria to be exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3), which states that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and where it can be seen with certainty 119
that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Given this Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05 meets the criteria for a General Rule Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3). As a result, the City Council hereby determines that Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05 has no potential to negatively impact the environment; and therefore, adopts said general rule exemption in accordance with CEQA guidelines.
SECTION 2. REQUIRED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FINDING.
In accordance with the provisions of the Wildomar Zoning Ordinance, the following finding is offered for City Council consideration in approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-05.
A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the City of Wildomar General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
The proposed amendment is consistent with the City of Wildomar General Plan in that the proposed amendment will allow for individual businesses to have a clear path towards establishing well-regulated temporary uses which in turn will enhance economic vitality (Goal LU 7.1). Further, the provisions outlined in the amendment will not impact the visual character of the business areas in that the strict regulations will maintain order and consistency related to temporary uses (Goal LU 4.1). The amendment is also consistent with the Zoning Ordinance in that the City is allowed to amend its temporary use requirements from time to time to address changes in the marketplace and to keep up with current business trends.
SECTION 3. AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
Chapter 17.256 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
CHAPTER 17.256 TEMPORARY USES AND EVENTS
17.256.010 Purpose
The City Council hereby determines that temporary event and temporary use permits provide a process for administrative review for short-term activities that may not meet the normal development or use standards of the applicable zoning district but may be acceptable because of their temporary nature. The intent of these regulations is to ensure that the temporary event or temporary use does not adversely impact the long- term uses of the same or neighboring sites, or impact the general health, safety, and welfare of persons residing within the community. The City Council has enacted the following provisions to regulate and control, in a content-neutral manner, temporary uses that are conducted in the City.
120
17.256.020 Definitions
The following terms shall have the following meanings for the purposes of this chapter:
“Established facility” means an existing, legally permitted facility that is designed and constructed to accommodate 2,000 or more people.
"Outdoor temporary parking lot dining” means a use of an adjacent, outside area by a food or beverage establishment for the same eating and drinking activities that occur within the establishment. The outdoor dining area may only be located in a parking lot adjacent to the food or beverage establishment pursuant to this chapter.
“Temporary Use” means all uses of a short-term nature or fixed duration listed in this chapter, which last for a duration of 2 days or longer and do not require permanent construction and which are approved with a specific time limit.
Temporary uses include, but are not limited to, the following: Seasonal sales, such as christmas tree or halloween pumpkin lots, temporary parking lot dining for established restaurants, and other temporary activities that the planning director determines are similar in nature and intensity to those identified in this section.
“Temporary event” means an individual event held either indoors or outdoors not to exceed six (6) times per calendar year to which the public is invited with or without charge. Temporary events include, but are not limited to, the following:
music festivals, stage and/or theatrical shows, sports events, fairs and/or carnivals, rodeos, automobile sales, off-road vehicle sales, animal sales, heavy equipment auctions and tent revival meetings. Temporary events are classified as follows:
1. “Major event” means a temporary event which 2,000 or more people are expected to attend.
2. “Minor event” means a temporary event which less than 2,000 are expected to attend.
17.256.030 Permit Required
Except as otherwise provided in this Zoning Ordinance, the temporary uses listed in this section shall require the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) from the Planning Director prior to establishment of the use. The Planning Director may impose conditions on the approval of a temporary use.
17.256.040 Temporary use regulations
A. Exempt temporary uses. The following temporary uses are exempt from the permit requirements of this section, provided they comply with the development standards listed below.
121
1. Emergency facilities. Temporary facilities to accommodate emergency public health and safety needs and activities.
2. Construction yards - on-site. Yards and sheds for the storage of materials and equipment used as part of a construction project, provided a valid building permit has been issued and the materials and equipment are stored on the same site as the construction activity.
3. Miscellaneous. Activities conducted on public property or within the public right-of-way that are approved by the City or as otherwise required by the Municipal Code.
B. Temporary use permit required . The following temporary uses and activities may be allowed, subject to the issuance of a temporary use permit. A complete application for a temporary use shall be submitted to the planning department at least 60 days prior to the scheduled use and include a plot plan exhibit accompanied by the required filing fee outlined in Council Resolution No. 2019-11.
The application package shall also include a signed letter from the property owner authorizing said temporary use.
1. Construction office. A temporary construction office used during the construction of a main building or buildings on the same site as part of a development project.
2. Model homes. A model home or model home complex may be authorized before the completion of subdivision improvements.
3. Temporary real estate offices, including sales trailers and related facilities. May be established within the area of an approved residential subdivision project, solely for the first sale of homes. In addition, conditions of approval regulating the hours of operation, landscaping, or other aspects as deemed necessary may be imposed as part of the Temporary Use Permit.
4. Seasonal sales lots. Temporary seasonal sales activities (e.g., Christmas trees, pumpkin sales, and other similar outdoor sales) may be permitted in any commercial or industrial zoning district, or on any religious facility or school site that abuts a collector or arterial roadway as designated in the General Plan.
Seasonal sales may be permitted in any non-residential zoning district upon issuance of a Temporary Use Permit. The term of permit shall not exceed sixty (60) calendar days per calendar year.
122
5. “Craft-fair/open-air market. An outdoor or indoor temporary use located on private or public (city) property, except vacant and/or unimproved land where non-agricultural products are sold, including but not limited to, arts, crafts, candy, soaps, balms, cosmetics, ceramics, bread, cheese, clothing, and handmade crafts (such as seasonal goods, ornaments, hand-dipped or rolled candles, etc.) and similar items and products for sale to the general public.
Items such as meat, poultry, fish, etc., and similar foods will be allowed only to the extent there is proper refrigeration and Riverside County Health Department approval, as applicable. Craft-fair/open-air markets shall be allowed no more than six (6) times per calendar year between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (Sunday - Thursday) and 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. (Friday – Saturday). Any event exceeding six (6) times per calendar year shall require approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission
6. Farmers Market (certified). An outdoor market on public (city) or private property where farmers and other producers of agricultural and related foodstuffs and products are sold, including non-agricultural products. A certified Farmer’s Market is subject to the provisions of Food & Agriculture Code Sections 47000 et seq. Farmers markets shall be allowed no more than six (6) times per calendar year between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (Sunday - Thursday) and 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. (Friday – Saturday). Any event exceeding six (6) times per calendar year shall require approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission.
7. Temporary dwellings, including mobile homes, when a primary dwelling is being constructed or remodeled may be permitted, provided a valid building permit has been issued. The temporary dwelling shall be limited to a maximum of one (1) year and then must be removed from the premises. Recreational Vehicles are prohibited as a temporary dwelling.
8. Temporary Outdoor Parking Lot Dining.
a. Temporary parking lot dining that utilizes required parking spaces for outdoor dining for its customers shall be temporary in nature, shall not increase the general intensity of the restaurant use, shall facilitate safe business operations, and shall not exceed a period of time equal to 12 months.
i. If the business owner would like to convert the temporary outdoor parking lot dining area to a permanent feature, then the business owner shall, with the written authorization of the property owner, submit a Substantial Conformance application at least 6 months before expiration of the temporary use. The Substantial Conformance application will be subject to the same safety features listed below, including the required parking analysis.
ii. If the number of parking spaces is reduced below the minimum required for the site, the Planning Director may require bicycle rack 123
parking in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 17.188.030.B.5 of the WMC.
b. Temporary parking lot dining must include safety improvements to protect customers, including but not limited to, raised platforms (equal to height of adjacent walkway to meet ADA requirements), bollards placed 36” on center, K-rails around the perimeter of the parking spaces used for outdoor dining or other similar safety barriers.
c. The Planning Director may require a parking analysis based on existing site conditions as part of the Substantial Conformance review. d. The applicant shall first receive written approval from the property owner prior to submitting a temporary use permit application and shall include the letter in the application package.
e. The parking lot dining area shall not encroach into any drive aisles or fie lane.
f. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining the proper state A.B.C. license approval if alcohol is served in the outdoor dining area. Said state A.B.C. approval shall be submitted with the application package. g. The restaurant owner shall agree to indemnify the City and sign the indemnity clause on the temporary use permit application.
9. Temporary use of land.
a. The Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the temporary use of land in any zone classification, when such temporary use is in conjunction with the repair or construction of streets, highways, or public utilities, for a period of time not to exceed six (6) months. b. The Planning Commission may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the temporary use of land in any zone classification, when such temporary use is in conjunction with the repair or construction of streets, highways, or public utilities, for a period of time that exceeds six (6) months.
10. When a temporary use is not specifically listed in this section, the Director shall determine whether the proposed use is similar in nature to listed uses(s) and shall establish the term and make necessary findings and conditions for the particular use.
C. Findings for Temporary Uses. A temporary use permit shall meet all the findings below. If the Director does not make all of these findings, the temporary use permit shall be denied.
1. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
124
2. The use, as described and conditionally approved, will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the city.
3. Approved measures for the removal of the use and site restoration have been required to ensure that no changes to the site would limit the range of possible future land uses otherwise allowed by this zoning code.
D. Conditions. In approving a temporary use permit, the Director may impose such applicable conditions to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. Such conditions may include, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Measure to minimize impact on adjacent uses, such as buffers, hours of operation, lighting requirements, and/or parking measures.
2. Property maintenance requirements to ensure that each site occupied by a temporary use shall be cleaned of debris, litter, or any other evidence of the temporary use upon completion or removal of the use.
3. Appropriate performance guarantees/security may be required before initiation of the use to ensure proper cleanup after the use is finished.
4. Other conditions of approval deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the approval would be in compliance with the findings above.
E. Revocation. A temporary use permit may be revoked pursuant to and in accordance with Chapter 17.220 of the WMC.
17.256.050 Temporary Event regulations.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter to the contrary, a “major event” shall only be held indoors in an established facility as defined in this chapter. A “minor event” may be held indoors in an established facility or outdoors. All major and minor temporary events shall comply with the following use regulations.
A. Temporary Event Permit Application. A complete application for a major or minor temporary event shall be submitted to the Planning Director, or designee, at least sixty (60) days prior to the scheduled event, or as otherwise approved by the City Manager, or designee. The application shall include a plot plan exhibit accompanied by the required filing fee outlined in Council Resolution No. 2019-11. The application package shall also include a signed letter from the underlying property owner authorizing said event on the property in question. If the event is held within a multi- tenant commercial center, the application package shall also include a signed letter from each business owner that may be affected by the event.
B. Use Time Limitation. A major or minor temporary event shall be allowed no more than six times per calendar year subject to the requirements specified in subsection C below. Any event exceeding six (6) times per calendar year shall require approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission.
C. Requirements for Approval. The Planning Director shall approve a major or minor temporary event provided all of the following requirements are complied with. 125
1. The use limitation discussed in subsection B of this section has not been exceeded by the same applicant.
2. There is no pending code enforcement action on the property underlying the proposed event location.
3. A noise and lighting mitigation plan shall be approved by the Planning Department for events held at night.
4. An access and parking plan has been approved by the Public Works Director.
5. A fire protection plan has been approved by the Fire Department, if applicable.
6. A security operations plan has been approved by the Police Department, if applicable.
7. If food will be prepared and served as part of the event, the applicant shall obtain a permit from Riverside County Environmental Health Department. A copy of the approved permit shall be submitted with the application package.
8. If alcohol is proposed for sale for on-site consumption, the applicant shall obtain the appropriate license from the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC). A copy of the approved license shall be submitted with the application package.
9. The event shall not block, restrict, or impair any of the following:
a. The public’s view of another business or activity on the property where said event is being held.
b. The public’s view of business signage for adjacent tenants in the commercial center where said event is being held.
c. The view or visibility of the operator of any motor vehicle. d. The movement of any pedestrian or motor vehicle on the public right-of- way.
e. The points of ingress and egress to the commercial site where the event is being held.
10. No signage may be located in the public right-of-way without the approval of an encroachment permit made by the City Engineer.
11. Any signage/banners proposed to be used for the event shall comply with the regulations outlined in Section 17.252 (Sign Regulations) of this code.
12. Temporary tents or shade structures/easy-ups are permitted to be used to shade vendors and their products.
D. Hours of Operation. A major or minor temporary event shall be permitted only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (Sunday - Thursday) and 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. (Friday – Saturday). Any event outside of these hours shall be approved by the City Council prior to the temporary event application submittal to the Planning Department.
126
E. Bond and insurance. The Planning Director may require an applicant for a major and/or minor event to post a bond, or to otherwise financially secure that the event location is restored to its original condition and that the City is fully reimbursed for any unanticipated law enforcement or emergency medical expenses. The Planning Director shall determine the amount of the bond or other security and the applicant shall post it with the Building Official. The Planning Director may also require an applicant for a major and/or minor to obtain indemnity or liability insurance naming the City as the insured if the event is held on public property.
F. Advertising/ticket sales. No person shall advertise, sell, or furnish tickets for a minor event until a permit has been obtained for the event in accordance with this chapter.
G. Revocation. A minor event permit may be revoked pursuant to and in accordance with Chapter 17.220.
SECTION 4. AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
Section 17.172.220 (Setback adjustments) is hereby amended to delete “temporary use of land” from the title.
SECTION 5. AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
Section 17.172.220.A.2 of the Wildomar Municipal Code is hereby deleted.
SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY
If any Chapter, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each Chapter, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.”
SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage by the City Council.
SECTION 8. CITY CLERK ACTION
The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause this Ordinance to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage in a newspaper of general circulation and circulated within the City in accordance with Government Code Chapter 36933(a) or, to cause this Ordinance to be published in the manner required by law using the alternative summary and posting procedure authorized under Government Code Chapter 39633(c). 127
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of September, 2022
_____________________
Ben J. Benoit
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
____________________________ ___________________________ Thomas D. Jex Janet Morales, CMC
City Attorney City Clerk
128
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.7
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
Zoning Ordinance No. 2022-06 - 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 223
SUBMITTED BY:
Matthew Bassi, Planning
PREPARED BY:
Matthew Bassi, Planning Director
ACTION:
Adopt an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 223
- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE OF
WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE WILDOMAR MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 16.72 TO TITLE 16 (SUBDIVISIONS), A NEW SECTION 17.204.110 TO CHAPTER 17.204 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS), AND A NEW CHAPTER 17.320 TO TITLE 17 (ZONING) FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 66411.7 AND 65852.21 (SB 9) RELATED TO URBAN LOT SPLITS AND TWO (2)-UNIT
DEVELOPMENTS
DISCUSSION:
The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 223 at the August 10, 2022 City Council meeting for Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-06. At this time, it would be appropriate for the City Council to adopt Ordinance No. 223.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ord 223
129
ATTACHMENT A
Council Ordinance for ZOA 2022-06
130
ORDINANCE NO. 223
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE OF
WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE WILDOMAR
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 16.72 TO
TITLE 16 (SUBDIVISIONS), A NEW SECTION 17.204.110
TO CHAPTER 17.204 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS),
AND A NEW CHAPTER 17.320 TO TITLE 17 (ZONING) FOR
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTIONS 66411.7 AND 65852.21 (SB 9) RELATED TO
URBAN LOT SPLITS AND TWO (2)-UNIT
DEVELOPMENTS
WHEREAS, SB 9 (Chapter 162, Statutes of 2021) enacted Sections 66411.7 and 65852.21 to the Government Code, effective January 1, 2022; and WHEREAS, these provisions require the City to provide ministerial approval of urban lot splits, (“Urban Lot Splits”) and the construction of up to two (2) residential dwelling units (“Two Unit Developments”) on each single-family residential zoned lot within the City, subject to certain limitations; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 66411.7(a) limits eligibility of Urban Lot Splits by size and proportionality; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 66411.7(a)(3)(C) and 65852.21(a)(2) limit Urban Lot Splits and Two Unit Developments, respectively, to sites that are not located on or within certain farmland, wetlands, very high fire hazard severity zones, hazardous waste sites, earthquake fault zones, special flood hazard areas, regulatory floodways, lands identified for conservation, habitats for protected species, and historic properties; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 66411.7(a)(3)(D) and 65852.21(a)(3) through (a)(5) limit eligibility of an Urban Lot Split and a Two Unit Development, respectively, that proposes to demolish or alter housing subject to affordability restrictions, housing subject to rent or price controls, housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years, housing that has been withdrawn from rent or lease within the past 15 years, and housing that requires demolition of existing structural walls unless authorized by local ordinance or has not been tenant-occupied within the past 3 years; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 65852.21(a)(6) and 66411.7(a)(3)(E) allow a city to deny an Urban Lot Split for properties within an historic district or listed on the State’s Historic Resource Inventory or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance; and
131
WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 66411.7(c) and 65852.21(b) allow a city to establish objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards for Urban Lot Splits and Two Unit Developments, respectively, subject to limits within state law; and
WHEREAS, such objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards may not have the effect of “precluding the construction of two (2) units on either of the resulting parcels from an Urban Lot Split or that would result in a unit size of less than 800 square feet” for a Two Unit Development; and WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 66411.7 and 65852.21 allow a city to deny a proposed Two (2)-Unit Development or Urban Lot Split, respectively, if the project would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined, and determined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Sections 65852.21(j) and 66411.7(n), the City may adopt an ordinance to implement the provisions of Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7, and such an ordinance shall not be considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”); and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to implement objective standards and an application process for projects undertaken pursuant to Government Code Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 by the adoption of such an ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 6, 2022 for Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-06, and adopted PC Resolution No. 2022-23 recommending City Council approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-06; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 17.280.040 of the Wildomar Municipal Code, the Planning Department, on July 29, 2022, published a legal notice in the Press Enterprise, a local newspaper of general circulation, notifying the general public of the City Council public hearing set for August 10, 2022 regarding Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-06; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 17.280.040 of the Wildomar Municipal Code, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on August 10, 2022 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-06, and at which time the City Council received public testimony concerning Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-06.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR HEREBY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
132
SECTION 1. FINDINGS
The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as findings.
SECTION 2. AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
Title 16 (Subdivisions) of the Wildomar Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new Chapter 16.72 (Urban Lot Splits) to read as follows:
CHAPTER 16.72 URBAN LOT SPLITS
16.72.010 Purpose and Intent
It is the purpose of this Chapter to provide procedures necessary for the implementation of Section 66411.7 of the Government Code pertaining to Urban Lot Splits, as defined in Section 16.72.020 herein. To accomplish this purpose, the regulations outlined herein are determined to be necessary for the preservation of the public health, safety, and general welfare, and for the promotion of orderly growth and development. Except where such provisions directly conflict with Section 66411.7 of the Government Code, the provisions of this Chapter shall apply.
16.72.020 Eligibility
A parcel map shall be required for all Urban Lot Splits, defined as the subdivision of a parcel into two (2) parcels pursuant to Section 66411.7 of the Government Code. An application for an Urban Lot Split shall be approved by the Planning Director if the application meets all of the following requirements:
A. The proposed Urban Lot Split will create no more than two (2) new parcels, and each of the newly created parcels meets the following requirements:
1. Is at least 1,200 square feet in size;
2. Is at least 40 percent of the lot area of the original parcel;
3. Has access to or adjoins the public right-of-way, sufficient to allow development on the parcel to comply with any property access requirements under the California Fire Code Section 503 and Title 14, California Code Regulations Section 1273.00 et seq., when applicable to the parcel; and
4. The parcel to be subdivided is located within the R-R, R-R-O, R-1, R- 1A, R-A, R-T, or R-T-R zone.
B. The parcel satisfies the requirements specified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4 of the Government Code.
C. The proposed Urban Lot Split would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
133
1. Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income;
2. Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power;
3. A parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner’s rights under chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the development proponent submits an application; and/or
4. Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years based on the date of the application for an Urban Lot Split.
D. The parcel is not located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a City landmark or City heritage resource.
E. The parcel has not been established through prior exercise of an Urban Lot Split provided for in Section 66411.7 of the Government Code or this Section.
F. Neither the owner of the parcel being subdivided nor any person acting in concert with the owner has previously subdivided an adjacent parcel using an Urban Lot Split as provided for in this chapter.
G. The proposed new parcels are intended for exclusively residential use.
H. The Urban Lot Split will not result in a structure being split over the two (2) parcels.
I. The owner of the parcel to be subdivided signs an affidavit under penalty of perjury declaring all of the following to be true:
1. The housing units proposed to be demolished or altered have not been occupied by a tenant at any time within three years of the date of the application for an urban lot split.
2. The owner of the parcel intends to occupy one of the housing units as their principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of the approval of the Urban Lot Split. Owner-occupancy is not required if the owner is a community land trust or qualified nonprofit corporation under Sections 214.15 or 402.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
3. The owner has not previously subdivided an adjacent parcel using an Urban Lot Split.
134
4. The owner has not previously acted in concert with any person to subdivide an adjacent parcel using an Urban Lot Split. “Acted in concert” means that the owner, or a person acting as an agent or representative of the owner, knowingly participated with another person in joint activity or parallel action toward a common goal of subdividing the adjacent parcel.
16.72.030 Objective Standards
All Urban Lot Splits under this Chapter shall also comply with the standards in this Section, unless the applicant can demonstrate that this would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of two (2) units on either of the resulting parcels, or would necessarily result in a unit size of less than 1,200 square feet for any unit on the resulting parcels:
A. New parcel lines that abut a street shall maintain right angles to streets or radial to the centerline of curved streets or be parallel to existing parcel lines.
B. Lots without twenty-four (24) feet or more of frontage on a street will not be permitted. Frontage requirements for flag lots may be satisfied by a driveway or private road accessing a street of twelve (12) in width or more.
C. A minimum of one (1) off-street parking space shall be provided on each parcel except no parking shall be required where the parcel meets one or both of the following instances:
1. The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high-quality transit corridor, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major transit stop, as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.
2. There is a car-share vehicle located within one block of the parcel.
D. No additional setback shall be required for an existing structure, or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. Verification of size and location of the existing and proposed structure requires pre- and post-construction surveys by a California licensed land surveyor.
E. The parcel map satisfies the objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and this Chapter regarding parcel maps.
16.72.040 Filing, processing, and action
A. An application for an Urban Lot Split must be made through submittal of a City Parcel Map application and requisite fees and approved by the Planning Director as provided for in Section 16.12.150 of this code. The minimum information for a Parcel Map is provided on the application form.
B. The City shall act on an application for an Urban Lot Split within fifty-days (50) from the date the City deems an application to be complete . If the 135
applicant requests a delay in writing, the fifty-day (50) time period shall be tolled for the period of the delay. The City has acted on the application if it:
1. Approves or denies the application for the Urban Lot Split; or
2. Informs the applicant in writing that changes to the proposed project are necessary to comply with this Chapter.
C. The Planning Director shall deny the Urban Lot Split if either of the following is found:
1. The Urban Lot Split fails to meet or perform one of more objective requirements imposed by the Subdivision Map Act or by this chapter.
Any such requirement or condition shall be specified; and/or
2. The building official makes a written finding, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed subdivision would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5 of the Government Code, upon public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.
D. The Planning Director shall not reject an application solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance.
E. The Planning Director shall condition approval on the dedication of any easements deemed necessary for the provision of public services to the proposed parcels and any easements deemed necessary for access to the public right-of-way.
F. The Planning Director shall not require the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions.
G. The Planning Director shall not require dedications of rights-of-way or the construction of offsite improvements for the parcels being created as a condition of approval of a parcel map for an Urban Lot Split.
16.72.050 Use and Development Requirements
A. It shall be unlawful to rent, offer to rent or lease, or to advertise for rent or lease, any dwelling unit or portion thereof constructed on a lot created under this Chapter for a term that is thirty (30) days or less.
B. It shall be unlawful to use any dwelling unit constructed on a lot created under this Chapter for any use other than a residential use.
C. New dwelling units constructed under this Chapter shall be no more than 1,200 square feet in floor area.
136
D. Development of new dwelling units on any lot created under this Chapter shall be subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.320 (Two-Unit Developments) herein and shall also comply with all applicable objective zoning requirements applicable to the subject parcels and any objective requirements in the City’s residential design guidelines, as applicable. The standards described in this paragraph shall apply to all Urban Lot Splits except where such standard directly conflicts with a provision of this Chapter, or whether the applicant demonstrates that such zoning district standard or design standard would have the effect of the effect of physically precluding the construction of two (2) units on either of the resulting parcels or would necessarily result in a unit size of less than 800 square feet.
SECTION 3. AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
Chapter 17.204 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of the Wildomar Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new Subsection 17.204.110 to read as follows:
17.204.110 Exception
Pursuant to the authority provided by Section 65852.21(f) of the Government Code, notwithstanding any other provision in this Chapter, no accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit shall be permitted on any lot in a single-family zoning district if: 1) an Urban Lot Split has been approved for the lot pursuant to Chapter 16.72 herein, and 2) a Two Unit Development has been approved for construction on the lot pursuant to Chapter 17.320 herein.
SECTION 4. AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE
Title 17 (Zoning) of the Wildomar Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new Chapter 17.320 (Two Unit Developments) to read as follows:
CHAPTER 17.320 TWO UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
17.320.010 Purpose and Intent
The purpose of this Chapter is to provide regulations for the establishment of Two Unit Developments, as defined in Section 17.320.020, pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.21. To accomplish this purpose, the regulations outlined herein are determined to be necessary for the preservation of the public health, safety and general welfare, and for the promotion of orderly growth and development. Except where such provisions directly conflict with Section 66411.21 of the Government Code, the provisions of this Chapter shall apply.
17.320.020 Eligibility
Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter to the contrary, a residential development containing no more than two (2) residential units on one legal lot within the R-R, R-R-O, R-1, R-1A, R-A, R-T and R-T-R zones (“Two Unit Development”) may be constructed following approval of by the Planning Director, without discretionary review or a public 137
hearing, if the proposed Two Unit Development meets all of the requirements set forth below:
A. A Two Unit Development may be permitted under this Chapter if the development will result in no more than two (2) residential units in total on a lot. If the lot has an existing dwelling, one additional unit may be developed pursuant to this Chapter. If a parcel does not include an existing dwelling, or if the existing dwelling is proposed to be demolished in connection with the creation of a Two Unit Development, up to two (2) dwelling units may be developed pursuant to this Chapter.
B. Incompatibility with the City’s density limitations shall not provide a basis to deny a Two Unit Development that otherwise conforms to the requirements of this Chapter.
C. A Two Unit Development shall not be approved in each of the following circumstances:
1. The Two Unit Development would require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
a. Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
b. Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid exercise of its police power.
c. Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years. Demolition of up to 25% of the exterior structural walls is permitted.
2. The parcel subject to the proposed Two Unit Development is a parcel on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner’s rights under Government Code Section 7060 et seq. to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the Two Unit Development proponent submits an application.
3. The parcel subject to the proposed Two Unit Development is located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance.
4. The parcel subject to the proposed Two Unit Development does not satisfy the requirements specified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Government Code Section 65913.4.
138
17.320.030 Objective Standards
Except as provided in this Section, Two Unit Developments under this Chapter shall conform to all objective property development regulations of the zone in which the property is located including, but not limited to, setbacks, building height, building size, structural coverage, and impervious coverage, and any objective requirements in the City’s design guidelines, unless the applicant demonstrates that such zoning or design standard would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of up to two (2) residential units on the parcel, or that would physically preclude either of the two (2) units from being at least 800 square feet in floor area, subject to the following modifications:
A. New dwelling units constructed under this chapter shall each be no more than 1,200 square feet in floor area.
B. No additional setback shall be required for an existing structure, or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. Verification of size and location of the existing and proposed structure requires pre- and post-construction surveys by a California licensed land surveyor.
C. A setback of at least four (4) feet is required from the rear and side property lines. Front yard setbacks shall be as required for the zone in which the property is located.
D. Primary Entrance Orientation. The primary entrance to each new dwelling unit shall face the front or interior of the parcel unless the unit is directly accessible from an alley or a public street.
E. Privacy Impacts. To minimize privacy impacts on adjacent properties, the following requirements apply to building walls with windows within eight (8) feet of an interior side or rear property line abutting a residential use:
1. For a single-story building wall or the first story of a two (2) story wall, privacy impacts shall be minimized by either:
a. A six-foot solid fence (wood, block, or vinyl) on the property line; or
b. Opaque windows for all windows facing the adjacent property.
2. For a second story building wall, all windows facing the adjacent property shall be opaque.
F. If a proposed dwelling unit will be connected to an onsite wastewater treatment system, the applicant shall provide a percolation test completed within the last 5 years, or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last 10 years.
G. Any dwelling unit, or portion thereof, that is constructed pursuant to an approval under this Section shall only be used for rentals of terms of longer than thirty (30) days. It shall be unlawful to rent, offer to rent or lease, or to 139
advertise for rent or lease, any dwelling unit or portion thereof built pursuant to authority under this Section for a term that is thirty days or less.
H. A minimum of one (1) off-street parking space shall be provided for each dwelling unit except where that no parking shall be required when the parcel meets one or both of the following instances:
1. The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high-quality transit corridor, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major transit stop, as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.
2. There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel.
I. When construction of a new dwelling unit is proposed on a parcel with an existing dwelling unit, any new dwelling unit shall utilize the same exterior materials and colors as the existing dwelling unit, subject to any restrictions on use of building materials. Where two (2) new units are proposed to be constructed on a parcel, each unit shall utilize the same exterior materials and colors as the other unit.
J. Each dwelling unit constructed under this Section shall utilize a separate utility connection directly from each dwelling unit to the utility for water, sewer, gas, and electrical utilities.
K. Each unit in a two (2)-unit residential development shall be separated by a distance of at least ten (10) feet from any other structure on the parcel; however, units may be adjacent or connected if the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow a separate conveyance.
L. Second story exterior decks and balconies, and rooftop decks, shall be prohibited on dwelling units constructed under this Section.
17.320.040 Filing, Processing and Action
A. A Two Unit Development that complies with all standards in this Chapter shall be approved ministerially with an administrative permit. No discretionary review or public hearing is required. A building permit application may be submitted concurrently with the administrative permit application.
B. The City shall act on an application for a Two Unit Development within sixty (60) days from the date the City receives a completed permit application. If the applicant requests a delay in writing, the sixty-day (60) time period shall be tolled for the period of the delay. The City has acted on the application if it:
1. Approves or denies the building permit for the Two Unit Development; or
140
2. Informs the applicant in writing that changes to the proposed project are necessary to comply with this chapter.
C. The Planning Director shall deny the Two Unit Development if either of the following is found:
1. The Two Unit Development fails to meet or perform one of more objective requirements imposed by this Chapter. Any such requirement or condition shall be specified.
2. The building official makes a written finding, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed development would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined, and determined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon public health and safety or the physical environment and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.
D. The Planning Director shall not reject an application solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that the structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance.
E. The Planning Director shall condition approval on the dedication of any easements deemed necessary for the provision of public services to the proposed residential units and any easements deemed necessary for access to the public right-of-way.
F. The Planning Director shall not require the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions.
17.320.050 Use Requirements
A. It shall be unlawful to rent, offer to rent or lease, or to advertise for rent or lease, any dwelling unit or portion thereof under this Chapter for a term that is thirty days or less.
B. It shall be unlawful to use any dwelling unit under this Chapter for any use other than a residential use.
C. Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, no more than two (2) dwelling units shall be permitted on any parcel created under the provisions of this Chapter.
SECTION 5. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
The City Council finds and determines that enactment of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), pursuant to Government Code Sections 65852.21(j) and 66411.7(n), as this action is to adopt an ordinance to implement the requirements of Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 of the Government Code.
141
SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each Section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance No. 223 shall take effect thirty (30) days from its passage by the City Council.
SECTION 8. CITY CLERK ACTION
The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause this Ordinance to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage in a newspaper of general circulation and circulated within the City in accordance with Government Code Section 36933(a) or, to cause this Ordinance to be published in the manner required by law using the alternative summary and posting procedure authorized under Government Code Section 36933(c).
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 14th day of September , 2022. _________________________
Ben J. Benoit
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ ________________________
Thomas D. Jex Janet Morales, CMC
City Attorney City Clerk
142
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.8
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
2022 Conflict of Interest Code Biennial Notice Local Agencies SUBMITTED BY:
Janet Morales, City Clerk's Office
ACTION:
Receive and file the 2022 Conflict of Interest Code Biennial Notice for the City of Wildomar.
SUMMARY:
The Political Reform Act requires every local government agency to review its conflict of interest code biennially. A conflict of interest code tells public officials, governmental employees, and consultants what financial interests they must disclose on their Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700).
BACKGROUND:
The Political Reform Act requires public agencies to adopt a local Conflict of Interest Code designating positions required to file Statements of Economic Interests (Form 700) and assigning disclosure categories specifying the types of interests to be reported. The Conflict of Interest code must be reviewed biennially and updated as needed.
By July 1, 2022: The code reviewing body must notify agencies and special districts within its jurisdiction to review their conflict of interest codes.
By October 3, 2022: The biennial notice must be filed with the agency’s code reviewing body.
DISCUSSION:
The Fair Political Practices Commission has prepared a 2022 Local Agency Biennial Notice form for local agencies to complete within its jurisdiction before submitting to the code reviewing body. The City Council is the code reviewing body for city agencies.
The last update to the Conflict of Interest Code was completed in October 2019. The latest schedule of authorized positions was updated in January of 2022. There are several positions added that will need to be added to the Conflict of Interest Code.
143
This item is to notify the City Council that the City Clerk's office has prepared the attached Conflict of Interest Code Biennial Notice which states that an amendment will be required.
Since an amendment is needed, the amended code will be brought back to the City Council with a Resolution for approval within 90 days of receiving and filing this notice.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. 2022 Wildomar
Biennial Notice
2. Position Classification Schedule FY2021-22 effective 01-01-2022
3. Reso 2019-68 - Conflict of Interest Code
144
www.fppc.ca.gov
FPPC Advice: [email protected] (866.275.3772)
2022 Local Agency Biennial Notice
Name of Agency:
Mailing Address:
Contact Person: Phone No.
Email: Alternate Email:
Accurate disclosure is essential to monitor whether officials have conflicts of interest and to help ensure public trust in government. The biennial review examines current programs to ensure that the agency’s code includes disclosure by those agency officials who make or participate in making governmental decisions.
This agency has reviewed its conflict of interest code and has determined that (check one BOX):
q An amendment is required. The following amendments are necessary:
(Check all that apply.)
¡ Include new positions
¡ Revise disclosure categories
¡ Revise the titles of existing positions
¡ Delete titles of positions that have been abolished and/or positions that no longer make or participate in making governmental decisions
¡ Other (describe)
q The code is currently under review by the code reviewing body. q No amendment is required. (If your code is over five years old, amendments may be necessary.)
Verification (to be completed if no amendment is required) This agency’s code accurately designates all positions that make or participate in the making of governmental decisions. The disclosure assigned to those positions accurately requires that all investments, business positions, interests in real property, and sources of income that may foreseeably be affected materially by the decisions made by those holding designated positions are reported. The code includes all other provisions required by Government Code Section 87302.
__________________________________________ _________________________ Signature of Chief Executive Officer Date
All agencies must complete and return this notice regardless of how recently your code was approved or amended. Please return this notice no later than October 3, 2022, or by the date specified by your agency, if earlier, to:
(PLACE RETURN ADDRESS OF CODE REVIEWING BODY HERE)
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN THIS FORM TO THE FPPC.
145
General Code 4/14/2021
12 Code Enforcement Technician Non-Exempt General Code 4/14/2021
24 Senior Planner Non-Exempt General Planning 1/13/2021 6 Recreation Leader II Non-Exempt General Community Services 1/13/2021 Minimum Wage Recreation Leader I Non-Exempt General Community Services 1/1/2022 15 Purchasing & Contracts Coordinator Non-Exempt General Administration 6/30/2021 15 Plans Examiner Non-Exempt General Building 1/13/2021 37 Planning Director Exempt Mgmt Planning 1/13/2021
22 Parks, Community Services, and Cemetery District Manager Exempt Mgmt Maintenance 1/13/2021 16 Manager of Operations and Maintenance Exempt Mgmt Maintenance 1/13/2021 6 Intern II (Graduate) Non-Exempt General varies 1/13/2021 Minimum Wage Intern I (Undergraduate) Non-Exempt General varies 1/1/2022 22 Human Resources Administrator Non-Exempt General Human Resources 1/13/2021 11 Groundsworker- Senior Non-Exempt General Maintenance 1/13/2021 9 Groundsworker II Non-Exempt General Maintenance 1/13/2021 7 Groundsworker I Non-Exempt General Maintenance 1/13/2021 37 Finance Director Exempt Mgmt Finance 1/13/2021
29 Finance Manager Exempt Mgmt Finance 1/13/2021
23 Economic Development Manager Exempt Mgmt Economic Development 1/13/2021 30 Economic Development Director Exempt Mgmt Economic Development 1/13/2021 12 Development Services Technician Non-Exempt General Building 6/9/2021 21 Community Services Manager Exempt Mgmt Community Services 1/13/2021 30 Community Services Director Exempt Mgmt Community Services 6/9/2021 16 Code Enforcement Officer II Non-Exempt General Code 4/14/2021 18 Code Enforcement Officer, Senior Non-Exempt General Code 4/14/2021 20 Code Enforcement Supervisor Non-Exempt
14 Code Enforcement Officer I Non-Exempt General Code 4/14/2021 Contract City Manager Exempt Exec City Manager 1/13/2021 31 City Engineer Exempt Mgmt Engineering 1/13/2021
27 City Clerk Exempt Mgmt City Clerk 1/13/2021
29 Chief Building Official Exempt Mgmt Building 1/13/2021 17 Building Inspector II Non-Exempt General Building 1/13/2021 15 Building Inspector I Non-Exempt General Building 1/13/2021 22 Associate Planner Non-Exempt General Planning 1/13/2021 15 Building Inspection Supervisor Exempt General Building 6/30/2021 20 Associate Engineer Non-Exempt General Engineering 1/13/2021 40 Assistant City Manager Exempt Exec Administration 1/13/2021 17 Assistant Planner Non-Exempt General Planning 1/13/2021 18 Assistant Engineer Non-Exempt General Engineering 1/13/2021 15 Assistant City Clerk Non-Exempt General City Clerk 1/13/2021 14 Animal Services Supervisor Non-Exempt General Animal Control 1/13/2021 7 Animal Services Officer Non-Exempt General Animal Control 1/13/2021 37 Administrative Services Director Exempt Mgmt Administration 1/13/2021 23 Administrative Analyst, Senior Non-Exempt General Varies 1/13/2021 11 Administrative Assistant II Non-Exempt General Administration 1/13/2021 7 Administrative Assistant I Non-Exempt General Administration 1/13/2021 Minimum Wage Administrative Aide I Non-Exempt General Administration 1/1/2022 17 Administrative Analyst II Non-Exempt General Administration 1/13/2021 13 Administrative Analyst Non-Exempt General Administration 1/13/2021 12 Accounting Specialist I Non-Exempt General Administration 1/13/2021 23 Accounting Manager Exempt Mgmt Accounting 1/13/2021
City of Wildomar
Position Classification Schedule - Revised Pay and FLSA Status - January 2022 Current Pay
Grade Classification FLSA
Status Group Career
Family Date
19 Accountant I Non-Exempt General Accounting 11/10/2021 17 Public Works Inspector II Non-Exempt General Public Works 6/30/2021 37 Public Works Director Exempt Mgmt Public Works 1/13/2021 14 Accounting Specialist II Non-Exempt General Administration 6/30/2021 26 Senior Engineer Exempt General Engineering 12/15/2021 19 Building Inspector III Non-Exempt General Building 6/30/2021 4 Administrative Aide II Non-Exempt General Administration 1/13/2021 23 Accountant III Non-Exempt General Accounting 11/10/2021 21 Accountant II Non-Exempt General Accounting 11/10/2021 146
147
148
149
150
151
152
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.9
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
Wildomar Local Roadway Safety Plan (CIP 051-1)
SUBMITTED BY:
Jason Farag, Public Works/ Engineering
PREPARED BY:
Cameron Luna, Associate Engineer
ACTION:
Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2022 - ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A STATUTORY CEQA EXEMPTION PER SECTION 15262 (FEASIBILITY AND
PLANNING STUDIES) OF CEQA AND ADOPTING THE WILDOMAR LOCAL ROADWAY
SAFETY PLAN
SUMMARY:
Adoption of the Wildomar Local Roadway Safety Plan and adoption of a related CEQA Exemption.
BACKGROUND:
On February 12, 2020, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a Services Agreement between the City of Wildomar and KOA Corporation for preparation of a Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR) (CIP 051). The SSAR is a report that analyzes existing roadway conditions throughout the City to identify systemic roadway issues and recommend safety improvements. During the development of the SSAR, a new federal program for preparing a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) was created, and the City was awarded grant funds from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the preparation of an LRSP (CIP 051-1). The LRSP has become the new municipal standard for roadway safety studies.
Upon completion of the SSAR in February 2021, the City began development of the LRSP.
The LRSP analyzes collision data, assesses infrastructure deficiencies through an inventory of roadway system elements, and identifies roadway safety solutions on a citywide basis. The 153
LRSP incorporates the findings from the SSAR with additional safety recommendations utilizing both engineering and non-engineering countermeasures. While SSARs primarily follow an engineering-based approach, the LRSP takes a more holistic safe-systems approach through a framework of addressing the four “E”s of traffic safety: Engineering, Enforcement, Education, and Emergency Services.
The LRSP helps local agencies identify and develop safety projects that can then be submitted for funding through the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), as well as other grant programs. The LRSP also helps local agencies identify non-engineering solutions to help improve roadway safety. In 2022, the LRSP became a requirement for submitting HSIP grant applications.
DISCUSSION:
The LRSP involved a public input process and a stakeholder engagement process to receive input regarding concerns and recommended improvements to the City's roadway network. City staff and the City's LRSP consultant met with key stakeholders including representatives from from the Riverside County Sheriff's Department, CalFire/Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside Transit Agency, City of Lake Elsinore, and the County of Riverside Department of Transportation. In addition, a City Council Workshop was held on April 13, 2022 to go over the project. At that workshop, the City received community input regarding concerns and recommended improvements. Both the stakeholder input and the public input helped inform final recommendations included in the LRSP. Summaries of the public input and stakeholder input received through the LRSP development process are included in the final LRSP, included as Attachment A.
A summary of some of the engineering and non-engineering safety countermeasures that are recommended in the LRSP are included below.
Engineering Countermeasures
Signal timing adjustments
New signals
Lighting improvements
Leading pedestrian intervals
Flashing beacons
Non-Engineering Countermeasures
Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Program
Active Transportation Program
Sustainable Communities Grant Program
Office of Traffic Safety Grants
The LRSP also includes a list of specific recommended projects that are consistent with the safety countermeasures. Some projects are short term projects that can be implemented more quickly, while others are long-term projects that may require more time and funding to 154
implement. A full list of all of the recommended projects is included in Section 8 of the final LRSP.
As a result of the LRSP development process, the City is preparing and planning to submit three HSIP and one Safe Routes for All (SS4A) applications for the current grant cycle, each based on safety project recommendations made in the report.
Although the LRSP is focused on roadway safety, the LRSP does not focus on speed limits.
Speed limits and their establishment follow specific requirements established in the California Vehicle Code. Enforcement, one of the 4 E's previously mentioned, is an LRSP strategy that can be implemented to enforce existing speed limits, but the LRSP does not provide an assessment on existing speed limits in the City. Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43) does provide additional tools that the City may use to evaluate and potentially update existing speed limits on City roadways. Staff is completing an evaluation of AB 43's applicability on specific streets in Wildomar and plans to bring forward a future agenda item to the City Council regarding speed limits that may be adjusted based on AB 43.
By focusing on safety, the LRSP builds off of the City Council’s adopted vision statement:
“The City of Wildomar will be a safe and active community with responsible growth and quality infrastructure while keeping a hometown feel.” (CC Resolution No. 2017-12).
CEQA DETERMINATION:
The proposed project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and it has been determined that the project falls under a Statutory Exemption pursuant to Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) of the State CEQA Guidelines because the proposed action would approve the Local Roadway Safety Plan consisting of possible future projects, which the City of Wildomar has not approved, adopted or funded. Thus, no further environmental review is currently necessary. However, projects resulting from the Local Roadway Safety Plan may require environmental review and a CEQA determination completed prior to commencing said project(s).
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funding for the LRSP was previously included and approved in the FY 21/22 and FY 22/23 budgets for CIP 051-1 and no additional funding is needed at this time.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
A - Wildomar Local Road Safety Plan
B - LRSP Presentation
155
RESOLUTION NO. 2022 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A STATUTORY CEQA EXEMPTION PER SECTION 15262 (FEASIBILITY
AND PLANNING STUDIES) OF CEQA AND ADOPTING THE WILDOMAR LOCAL
ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN
WHEREAS, A Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) creates a framework to systematically identify and analyze transportation safety issues, collaborate with partner agencies and stakeholders, and develop a multidisciplinary tool box of traffic safety countermeasures; and WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is one of the City's main sources of traffic safety grant funding; and
WHEREAS, the HSIP now requires an adopted LRSP in order to be eligible for funding on their program; and
WHEREAS, the City embarked on an effort to develop an LRSP in accordance with State and Federal requirements and guidance; and
WHEREAS, the City engaged with partner agencies and the public in the development of this LRSP; and
WHEREAS, the LRSP will serve not only as a requirement for grant fund eligibility but also a blueprint for addressing traffic safety issues throughout the City across the 4 E's of traffic safety disciplines; Engineering, Education, Enforcement, & Emergency Services; and WHEREAS, the LRSP provides guidelines, goals and policies for future safety related projects with a detailed list of grant application ready projects for implementation; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Wildomar does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1. CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The approval of Resolution No. 2022 - is in compliance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as it has been determined that the proposed action by the City Council falls under a Statutory Exemption pursuant to Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) of the State CEQA Guidelines because the proposed action would approve the Local Roadway Safety Plan consisting of possible future projects, which the City of Wildomar has not approved, adopted or funded. Thus, no further environmental review is currently necessary. However, projects resulting from the Local Roadway Safety Plan, may require environmental review and a CEQA determination completed prior to commencing said project(s).
156
SECTION 2. CITY COUNCIL ACTION.
Based on the above, the City Council hereby adopts Resolution No. 2022 - , adopting a CEQA Exemption and adopting the Wildomar Local Roadway Safety Plan and Appendices, attached hereto as Exhibit A of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 14th day of September, 2022.
Ben J. Benoit
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Thomas D. Jex Janet Morales
City Attorney City Clerk
157
City of Wildomar
LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN
SEPTEMBER 2022
Prepared for:
City of Wildomar
Department of Public Works
23873 Clinton Keith Rd., Suite 201
Wildomar, CA 92595
Prepared By:
2141 W. Orangewood Ave.
Orange, CA 92868
T: 714.573.0317 | F: 714.573.9584
www.koacorp.com
Adopted Date: [Month] [Date], 2022 JB93120
158
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Safety Measures ................................................................................................................................................................ 1
2.0 INTRODUCTION 3
2.1 Four E’s of Safety ............................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Purpose of the LRSP......................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.2.1 ROLE OF SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (SSAR) 3
2.3 City of Wildomar ............................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.3.1 EQUITY ANALYSIS 4
2.3.2 SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS 4
2.4 LRSP Overview.................................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.4.1 SAFETY EMPHASIS AREAS 5
2.4.2 COMMUNITY OUTREACH 5
2.4.3 ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS 5
2.4.4 NON-ENGINEERING STRATEGIES 5
2.4.5 EVALUATION 5
2.4.6 IMPLEMENTATION 5
3.0 SAFETY EMPHASIS AREAS 7
3.1 Cross-Jurisdictional Collaboration .............................................................................................................................. 7
3.2 Night Collisions and Collisions with Objects .......................................................................................................... 7
3.3 Pedestrians and Bicyclists .............................................................................................................................................. 8
3.4 Speeding .............................................................................................................................................................................. 8
3.5 Driving Under the Influence (DUI) .............................................................................................................................. 8
4.0 COMMUNITY OUTREACH 9
4.1 Stakeholder Meeting ....................................................................................................................................................... 9
4.1.1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE 9
4.1.2 CAL FIRE/RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 9
4.1.3 LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 9
4.1.4 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 10
4.1.5 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 10
4.1.6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10
4.2 Community Workshop ................................................................................................................................................. 10
5.0 ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS 11
5.1 Engineering Projects ..................................................................................................................................................... 11
5.1.1 SIGNAL TIMING ADJUSTMENT 11
159
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE II
5.1.2 NEW SIGNALS 11
5.1.3 LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS 12
5.2 Other Engineering Countermeasures ..................................................................................................................... 12
5.2.1 LEADING PEDESTRIAN INTERVAL (LPI) 12
5.2.2 FLASHING BEACONS 13
5.3 Other Locations of Concern ....................................................................................................................................... 13
5.3.1 CLINTON KEITH ROAD 13
5.3.2 CLINTON KEITH ROAD & PALOMAR STREET 13
6.0 NON-ENGINEERING STRATEGIES 14
6.1 Education .......................................................................................................................................................................... 14
6.1.1 PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS 14
6.1.2 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI) 14
6.1.3 UNSAFE SPEED 14
6.2 Enforcement ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15
6.2.1 UNSAFE SPEED 15
6.2.2 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI) 15
6.3 Emergency Response ................................................................................................................................................... 16
7.0 EVALUATION 18
8.0 IMPLEMENTATION 20
8.1 Engineering Project Implementation ...................................................................................................................... 20
8.2 Non-Infrastructure Program Implementation Guidance ................................................................................ 21
8.2.1 FUNDING INFORMATION 24
LIST OF FIGURES
Attachment B: Location of Safety Projects Eligible for HSIP Funding ........................................................................ 26 Attachment D: Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Candidate Locations ..................................................................... 28
LIST OF TABLES
Table 6.1: Education Funding Sources ................................................................................................................................... 14 Table 6.2: Enforcement Funding Sources .............................................................................................................................. 16 Table 7.1: Collision Types to Monitor for Each Safety Project ...................................................................................... 19 Table 8.1: Implementation Categories for LRSP Safety Projects .................................................................................. 21 Table 8.2: Implementation Guidance for LRSP Non-engineering Programs ........................................................... 22 Attachment A: Wildomar LRSP Safety Projects Eligible for HSIP Funding ............................................................... 25 160
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE III
Attachment C: Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Candidate Projects ......................................................................... 27 Attachment E: Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Candidate Evaluation ..................................................................... 29
APPENDIX
Appendix A – Equity and Safety Policy Analysis
Appendix B – 2021 City of Wildomar Systemic Safety Analysis Report Appendix C – Community Meeting presentation, April 13, 2022 Appendix D – Community Meeting minutes, April 13, 2022
Appendix E – City Council Meeting minutes, April 13, 2022 Appendix F – City Resolution No. 2022-XX, Adoption of LRSP
161
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 1
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has established a program for cities to prepare a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) to identify safety needs and recommend projects to address these needs. LRSPs are intended to help local roadway owners contribute to the goals of Caltrans’ statewide Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) by focusing on local-level concerns. An LRSP provides a framework for organizing stakeholders to identify, analyze, and prioritize roadway safety improvements on local roads. This document serves as the LRSP for the City of Wildomar.
1.1 OVERVIEW
An LRSP analyzes collision data, assesses infrastructure deficiencies through an inventory of roadway system elements, and identifies roadway safety solutions on a citywide basis. The LRSP was created by the State to help local agencies develop safety projects that can be submitted for funding by the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). HSIP Cycle 11, announced in May 2022, requires an LRSP or equivalent plans such as a Vision Zero Plan or Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR).
Although the City of Wildomar completed an SSAR in 2021, this LRSP document is meant to expand on the findings of the SSAR. While SSARs primarily follow an engineering-based approach, the LRSP takes a more holistic safe-systems approach through a framework of addressing the four “E”s of traffic safety:
Engineering, Enforcement, Education, and Emergency Services.
This report has been prepared per Caltrans LRSP guidelines and the Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM) version 1.6 dated June 2022. The general content of this LRSP report follows this outline:
● Safety emphasis areas
● Community outreach
● Engineering recommendations
● Non-engineering strategies
● Evaluation
● Implementation
The LRSP fulfills the following purposes:
● Propose safety countermeasures to address safety issues. ● Prioritize safety improvement projects based on a benefit/cost ratio and other considerations.
The findings in this LRSP are built on the findings of the 2021 Wildomar Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR), attached as Appendix B. The SSAR contains a comprehensive collision history assessment, which informs the recommendations made in this LRSP.
1.2 SAFETY MEASURES
The following transportation safety emphasis areas were identified based on background information:
162
Executive Summary
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 2
● Cross-jurisdictional collaboration
● Night collisions and hit objects
● Pedestrians and bicyclists
● Unsafe speeding
● Driving or bicycling under the influence
The emphasis areas provide the City of Wildomar areas to focus on when developing projects, programs, and safety strategies for the LRSP.
The LRSP recommends engineering and non-engineering countermeasures, which help to address the identified emphasis areas derived from the collision analysis. Concerns and recommended improvements were discussed with stakeholders which include the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, Cal FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside Transit Agency, City of Lake Elsinore, and County of Riverside Department of Transportation. The City also held a community workshop for members of the public to participate in the process.
Some of the engineering countermeasures recommended for multiple locations in the City include:
● Signal timing adjustments
● New signals
● Lighting improvements
● Leading pedestrian intervals
● Flashing beacons
Funding for some of the engineering countermeasures listed in the LRSP may be available from the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).
In addition to the infrastructure improvements mentioned above, non-engineering safety measures address traffic safety concerns through education, encouragement, and enforcement. Several state and federal grant programs offer funds for non-engineering roadway safety projects, as shown below:
● Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Program ● Active Transportation Program
● Sustainable Communities Grant Program
● Office of Traffic Safety Grants
163
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 3
2.0 INTRODUCTION
KOA Corporation (KOA) has been retained by the City of Wildomar to develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP). The purpose of the LRSP is to provide a framework for traffic safety improvements through a collision history assessment, community outreach, and identification of safety emphasis areas. This LRSP proposes a series of countermeasures and improvements to address these issues at both the infrastructure and non-infrastructure level.
2.1 FOUR E’S OF SAFETY
The LRSP not only focuses on engineering improvements to mitigate crashes, but also addresses the other safety improvements in other areas such as enforcement, education, and emergency services.
According to the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) 2020-2024, two-thirds of all crashes are the result of aggressive driving. Male drivers are more likely to be at fault in aggressive driving-related crashes regardless of age. Making roadways safer requires the Four E’s to be involved (Engineering, Enforcement, Education, and Emergency Services). Working together with the Four E’s at the city level will help make city roads safer. Recently, Federal and State agencies have also considered Emerging Technologies and Equity as additional E’s to improve traffic safety. For instance, considering the use of emerging technologies such as “smart” traffic signal equipment can serve to connect vehicles and traffic control systems to enhance traffic safety.
2.2 PURPOSE OF THE LRSP
The LRSP systematically identifies and analyzes safety problems and recommends improvements through both infrastructure and non-infrastructure approaches. The development of an effective LRSP requires the cooperation of community stakeholders. For this LRSP, the City of Wildomar cooperated with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, Cal FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside Transit Agency, City of Lake Elsinore, Lake Elsinore Unified School District, and Riverside County Deparmtent of Transportation. The results of the LRSP are summarized with a prioritized list of improvements and actions. The LRSP offers a proactive approach to addressing roadway safety needs in Wildomar.
2.2.1 ROLE OF SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (SSAR)
In January 2021, the City of Wildomar completed a Systemic Safety Analysis Report, also known as the SSAR (included in this report as Appendix B). The purpose of the SSAR is to identify the most common collision categories across a roadway network in order to target projects that address the factors associated with those categories. The 2021 Wildomar SSAR includes a comprehensive analysis of collisions within the City between December 2014 and December 2019. The findings from that report provide a substantial foundation for the work done in this LRSP document. Some elements found in the SSAR would typically be found in an LRSP document for cities that do not have an existing SSAR in place.
164
Introduction
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 4
2.3 CITY OF WILDOMAR
Wildomar is a city in Riverside County. According to the 2020 US Census, Wildomar had a population of 36,875, a 14.6 percent increase from the 2010 population. Between December 2014 and December 2019, a total of 653 collisions occurred within the City (Appendix B).
2.3.1 EQUITY ANALYSIS
As part of this LRSP, the City of Wildomar was analyzed to identify potential equity concerns among residents, with program and project recommendations in the LRSP evaluated to improve these concerns.
The completed findings of this equity analysis can be found in Appendix A.
Wildomar is located in the Inland Empire, which has long had poor air quality due to its sunny, dry climate and geographical features funnel air from the greater Los Angeles area. The Riverside County General Plan states that the South Coast Air Basin, which Wildomar falls under, contains the worst air quality in the nation.
The U.S. Department of Transportation has developed a metric for determining which census tracts can be considered historically disadvantaged. This USDOT metric combines multiple datasets from agencies such as the CDC, U.S. Census Bureau, and EPA to arrive at an aggregate score for individual census tracts, using a combination of environmental, economic, and social metrics. All but three census tracts in the City of Wildomar meet the threshold for a Historically Disadvantaged Community by USDOT.
Analysis from CalEnviroScreen 4.0 reveals that Wildomar’s census tracts range from the 25 th percentile to
the 60th percentile (with higher percentiles indicating greater burden) among the state’s census tracts.
The Sedco Hills community in the northwest corner of the City is in the 60th percentile, meaning that it is more negatively burdened than 60 percent of California’s census tracts.
2.3.2 SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS
Existing planning documents in the City of Wildomar were analyzed to ensure congruity and help gauge the long-range direction of roadway safety policy in the City. The completed findings of this policy analysis can be found in Appendix A.
The Wildomar Active Transportation Plan and Wildomar Mobility Element contain several policies that promote roadway safety through pedestrian and bicycle improvements, lighting improvements, and signal upgrades. The documents also support outreach and education to encourage safe practices.
Other documents analyzed include the County of Riverside General Plan, the SCAG Connect SoCal Plan, the WRCOG Active Transportation Plan, and the City of Wildomar Old Town Vision. All of these documents make recommendations related to roadway safety and expansion of transportation mode options.
2.4 LRSP OVERVIEW
The following sections include a brief description of the tasks associated with the development of this LRSP, with a more detailed description of each task in subsequent sections of this document. 165
Introduction
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 5
2.4.1 SAFETY EMPHASIS AREAS
Transportation safety emphasis areas provide a strategic framework for developing and implementing the LRSP. The emphasis areas provide the City of Wildomar areas to focus on when developing projects, programs, and safety strategies for the LRSP. Based on previous collision data, the following emphasis areas were identified:
● Cross-jurisdictional collaboration
● Night collisions and hit objects
● Pedestrians and bicyclists
● Unsafe speeding
● Driving or bicycling under the influence
2.4.2 COMMUNITY OUTREACH
The City of Wildomar conducted stakeholder outreach in January 2022 to solicit feedback on areas that could improve traffic safety in the City. This information was collected as a supplement to work done on emphasis areas analysis and previous collision analysis work performed for the 2021 Wildomar SSAR. The City received feedback from the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, Cal FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside Transit Agency, City of Lake Elsinore, and County of Riverside Department of Transportation. Additionally, the City held a community workshop on April 13, 2022 for members of the public to provide feedback about traffic safety issues.
2.4.3 ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations were developed for engineering countermeasures in line with the goals of the LRSP program. These safety projects and locations are all considered viable safety projects and are recommended for funding. These recommendations include countermeasure numbers found in the Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM), anticipated Collision Reduction Factor (CRF), project lifespan, collision reduction benefits (in $) of installing the countermeasure, and maximum share of funding allowed if successful in an HSIP grant. Engineering recommendations supplement those found in the 2021 Wildomar SSAR.
2.4.4 NON-ENGINEERING STRATEGIES
This LRSP provides programs and strategies for education, enforcement, and emergency services. These measures intend to prevent and discourage unsafe road practices and use technological advancements to improve emergency response times.
2.4.5 EVALUATION
To measure the effectiveness and ensure the success of the safety measures proposed, this LRSP provides data sources and metrics which are to be used as indicators. Each safety emphasis area has one or more metrics particular to that area. These are primarily collision counts in which specific filters (collision type, parties involved, time of day, etc.) are applied.
2.4.6 IMPLEMENTATION
This LRSP identifies the time frame, responsible agencies, and measures of progress for each project and program. Projects were sorted into three categories: short (1-2 years), medium (2-3 years), and long (4-7 166
Introduction
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 6
years). Low cost projects typically cost less than $100,000, medium cost projects range from $100,000 to $500,000, and high cost projects tend to be greater than $500,000. 167
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 7
3.0 SAFETY EMPHASIS AREAS
Transportation safety emphasis areas provide a strategic framework for developing and implementing the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP). The emphasis areas provide the City of Wildomar areas to focus on when developing projects, programs, and safety strategies for the LRSP.
Based on the collision data analysis conducted for the City of Wildomar, KOA identified the following transportation safety emphasis areas:
● Cross-jurisdictional collaboration
● Night collisions and hit objects
● Pedestrians and bicyclists
● Unsafe speeding
● Driving or bicycling under the influence
The following section explains how each area was selected based on the collision analysis and how the emphasis areas should drive the development of projects and programs.
3.1 CROSS-JURISDICTIONAL COLLABORATION
Several significant corridors in the City of Wildomar are shared between Wildomar and neighboring cities. Most notably, portions of Mission Trail and Corydon Road are shared with the City of Lake Elsinore, and sit right at the border of the two cities. Small segments of Grand Avenue are also shared with both the City of Lake Elsinore, the City of Murrieta and the County of Riverside. The collision analysis showed that Mission Trail is the segment with the highest collision frequency and second highest collision rate, while Corydon Road has the fifth highest frequency and fourth highest collision rate. These corridors are important to the overall transportation network in the City of Wildomar (both Mission Trail and Corydon Road are considered Major Arterials in the recently adopted Wildomar Mobility Plan) and treatments are available that can improve safety on these corridors.
Coordination with neighboring cities, particularly Lake Elsinore, is crucial to successful development of projects and programs in this LRSP. Neighboring cities are considered essential stakeholders and partners when conducting outreach for the LRSP and in developing successful approaches to project implementation.
3.2 NIGHT COLLISIONS AND COLLISIONS WITH OBJECTS
A lack of street lighting in remote areas can lead to dangerous driving conditions at night. Overall, 34.2% of collisions in Wildomar took place at night, with 10.9% described specifically as occurring in areas with no street lights or where street lights were not functioning, a higher percentage than other cities of comparable size. According to the 2019 Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) rankings, Wildomar ranked 55 out of 94 peer cities for the number of collisions occurring between 9:00 pm and 3:00 am.
Another curious note in the collision patterns of Wildomar are the high number of collisions with fixed objects reported across the city. This collision type represents 21.8% of collisions reported, which represents the second highest collision type in the City (after broadsides). Collisions with fixed objects rarely make even the top three or four highest collision types in most comparable cities. There is 168
Safety Emphasis Areas
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 8
evidence that nighttime driving conditions in the City may be related to the high prevalence of collisions with fixed objects. Approximately 57% of all hit object collisions occur at night, suggesting that poor lighting conditions may contribute to these collision types.
One opportunity to install additional lighting throughout the City is to install lamps on existing SoCal Edison utility poles. Because of this, SoCal Edison should be considered an important stakeholder when considering the most efficient way to add additional lighting, particularly for roadway segments where there are not alternative installation locations such as on traffic signal poles. As mentioned above, lighting can help make it easier to see objects in or near the roadway before a collision with a fixed object may occur. On the other hand, it is important to try to avoid objects being present in the Clear Recovery Zone (including utility poles) that may pose a threat to motorists. Thus, communication with SoCal Edison is also important to ensure safe placement of any new utility poles and to develop plans to move any poles that may be too close to the roadway right-of-way.
3.3 PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS
Pedestrians and bicyclists are among the most vulnerable roadway users. People who frequently walk or bike are often too young or too old to drive or lack the means to purchase a car. Broad streets, narrow sidewalks, and limited crossing facilities can make walking not only uncomfortable but also unsafe.
Pedestrian and bicycle involved collisions make up 5.1% of collisions overall in the City of Wildomar, but make up 19.5% of all fatal and severe injury (KSI) collisions. Wildomar ranked 45 out of 94 peer cities in
the 2019 OTS rankings based on the number of pedestrian crashes, and 34 out of 94 cities based on crashes of pedestrians 65 and older. The amount of bicycle collisions are lower when compared to pedestrian collisions, which may reflect better bicycling conditions in Wildomar than comparable cities, or less ridership overall, or a combination of the two. Pedestrian and bicycle safety can be improved both through implementing infrastructure improvements catering to these modes throughout the City, as well as by better educating residents about safe walking and biking habits, and increasing awareness of these users for those driving motor vehicles.
3.4 SPEEDING
Unsafe travel speed was the second highest primary collision factor (PCF) for collisions in Wildomar.
Unsafe speed accounted for 21.8% of collisions across the City. Wildomar ranked 53 out of 94 peer cities in the 2019 OTS rankings for speed related crashes. Speeding remains a concern among many cities in California, where roadways have often been designed to maximize vehicle flow and give less regard to encouraging safe driving behaviors. Design interventions in streets can sometimes help encourage drivers to travel more slowly or at least not exceed the posted speed limit. Furthermore, educational programs and targeted enforcement strategies can also help to reduce speeding.
3.5 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)
Driving under the Influence (DUI) is the fourth-largest PCF in Wildomar, responsible for more than 12% of all collisions over the 5-year period, and responsible for 22% of KSI collisions. In the 2019 OTS rankings, Wildomar ranked 23 out of 94 peer cities for DUI arrests. These statistics are concerning as it suggests DUI collisions are more of an issue in Wildomar than many peer cities. Roadway infrastructure treatments are unlikely to affect DUI collisions, so most interventions must come from the side of educational programs, targeted campaigns, strategic enforcement strategies, and informed policymaking. 169
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 9
4.0 COMMUNITY OUTREACH
4.1 STAKEHOLDER MEETING
To supplement the analytical methods used to identify locations for treatments and recommendations in the SSAR, the LRSP focused on partnerships with the community to give input into this process and provide feedback on areas that could improve traffic safety in the City. Stakeholders were contacted after KOA completed the emphasis areas analysis and prior to developing non-infrastructure recommendations and infrastructure recommendations that supplement the SSAR. Stakeholders were asked to provide feedback about traffic safety issues they have observed through their work and possible approaches to resolving these issues.
Feedback was provided by the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department, Cal FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside Transit Agency, City of Lake Elsinore, and Riverside County Department of Transportation. These comments were provided during a stakeholder meeting, which took place on January 20, 2022. Comments were received from Lake Elsinore Unified School District via e-mail after the January 20, 2022 stakeholder meeting, as they were unable to attend during the original stakeholder meeting time.
4.1.1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE
Items discussed with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office include the following:
● Areas in the City with a history of speeding.
● Intersections of concern and reasons for concern.
● Experience with newer traffic control devices such as Flashing Yellow Arrow (FYA), Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB), Leading Pedestrian Intervals (LPI), and roundabouts. ● Enforcement strategies such as pedestrian crosswalk sting operations, DUI checkpoints, and other OTS funding.
● Traffic safety near schools, noted as main driver of pedestrian activity in the City.
4.1.2 CAL FIRE/RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Items discussed with the chiefs at Cal FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department included:
• Locations where paving roads may facilitate emergency vehicle access. • Use of Opticom systems for emergency vehicle pre-emption, and GPS technology in limited cases from GTT communications.
• Other minor adjustments that may improve emergency response times.
4.1.3 LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Lake Elsinore Unified School District provided feedback on the following items:
• How students travel to school, including walking, biking, and driving habits. • Safety concerns, including those regarding current school bus operations. • Location of school crossing guards (currently only provided at William Collier Elementary). 170
Community Outreach
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 10
The school district confirmed that they do not currently have any educational campaigns supporting traffic safety.
4.1.4 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY
During the meeting, issues discussed included safety concerns with bus accessibility at particular stations, bus stop location policy, and ideal roadway conditions for transit operation.
4.1.5 CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
Issues discussed with Lake Elsinore included strategies for pursuing funding for improvements in locations shared between the two cities, differences in typical infrastructure used, and strategies to resolve inconsistencies between each city’s respective general plans for the shared roadways.
4.1.6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Issues discussed with the County of Riverside Department of Transportation included strategies for pursuing funding for improvements in locations shared between the two agencies, differences in typical infrastructure used, and strategies to resolve inconsistencies between each agency’s respective general plans for the shared roadways.
4.2 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP
A community workshop took place on Wednesday, April 13, 2022. At the workshop, the approach taken by the City to develop the LRSP was discussed, and feedback was provided by community members.
Feedback was expressed through multiple sources: during the in-person workshop, during the workshop via virtual meeting software, and after the workshop via email. Some of the topics that generated the most feedback included:
• Traffic operations near schools
• Biking and walking concerns
• Clinton Keith Road operations
• Speed limit concerns
Input from community members was directly influential to the projects developed in this plan. The comments provided were carefully evaluated and the Plan aims to address as many concerns as possible.
Documentation related to this community meeting can be found in Appendix C, Appendix D, and Appendix E.
171
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 11
5.0 ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations were developed for engineering countermeasures and non-engineering strategies and programs (education, enforcement, and emergency services) in line with the goals of the LRSP program. Engineering recommendations supplement those found in the earlier completed SSAR.
5.1 ENGINEERING PROJECTS
The following list of recommendations includes projects already in the SSAR that have been prioritized based on the emphasis areas of the LRSP and the stakeholder outreach performed, in addition to new projects developed during the stakeholder outreach process. These safety projects and locations are all considered viable projects and are recommended for funding opportunities. Attachment A at the end of this report summarizes the proposed safety projects, including the type of countermeasure they would fall under in the Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM), anticipated Collision Reduction Factor (CRF), project lifespan, collision reduction benefits (in $) of installing the countermeasure, and maximum share of funding allowed if successful in an HSIP grant. Crash history is not the only reason to recommend safety improvements, as safety should be proactive. Attachment B shows the location of these projects in the City of Wildomar.
5.1.1 SIGNAL TIMING ADJUSTMENT
The Deputy providing feedback from the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department noted that it is difficult to enforce the “No Right on Red” restriction on the northbound right-turn pocket at the intersection of Clinton Keith Road and Hidden Springs Road. Based on analysis of the existing signal timing at this intersection, a northbound right-turn overlap phase can be added if applicable signal heads are replaced.
It is recommended to re-optimize signal timing at the intersection with the addition of this right-turn overlap phase.
5.1.2 NEW SIGNALS
The Lake Elsinore Unified School District and the deputy providing feedback from the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department noted that they have received safety complaints about the operation of Bundy Canyon Road and Almond Street in front of Elsinore High School. School buses have difficulty making a left-turn at this intersection out of the high school due to the high traffic volumes. There are also significant pedestrian volumes at Bundy Canyon Road and Almond Street. It is recommended to install a traffic signal at this intersection based on the potential risks to pedestrian safety at the intersection. The City confirmed that the intersection is warranted for a traffic signal and is included in the 5-Year CIP.
However, the City is still seeking funds for this traffic signal.
Another location identified as benefitting from a signal during the community outreach process is at Grand Avenue and Gruwell Street. An emergency vehicle pre-emption system is recommended alongside this signal improvement per the recommendation of the Riverside County Fire Department. While the intersection awaits funding for a traffic signal, lighting improvements may help to make the intersection safer in the short-term. The community recommendation for a signal at this location is consistent with the 2020 Wildomar Mobility Plan, which also identifies a signal at this intersection in the future (2040) condition.
172
Engineering Recommendations
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 12
5.1.3 LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS
Lighting improvements were one of the improvements identified in the SSAR as most likely to create safety benefits in the City of Wildomar. During conversations with the City of Lake Elsinore and County of Riverside during the stakeholder meeting, lighting improvements were among the countermeasures discussed where implementation would benefit from cross-jurisdictional collaboration. It is recommended to prioritize the installation of lighting in the following locations:
• Grand Avenue from Corydon Road to Richard Lane (shared with County of Riverside) • Mission Trail from Malaga Road to Corydon Road (shared with City of Lake Elsinore) • Mission Trail from Corydon Road to Bundy Canyon Road
• Clinton Keith Road from Wildomar Trail to Elizabeth Lane The County of Riverside has been trying to secure funding for street lighting, sidewalks, and bike lanes on Grand Avenue from Corydon Road to the west boundary of Wildomar (Richard Lane). The remaining three projects were already developed in the SSAR. Lighting on Mission Trail has been separated into two portions. The first segment occurs along where Mission Trail shares a border with the City of Lake Elsinore. The second segment occurs where Mission Trail is completely located within the City of Wildomar.
5.2 OTHER ENGINEERING COUNTERMEASURES
In addition to the above projects, there were additional countermeasures identified during the stakeholder outreach process that were not a significant part of the SSAR but still have significant potential safety benefits. It is recommended to prioritize further study of these countermeasures to find locations throughout the City where the treatment can improve the existing location.
5.2.1 LEADING PEDESTRIAN INTERVAL (LPI)
A Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) is a signal adjustment that gives pedestrians a head start, of typically 3 or more seconds, on their walk signal before vehicles receive a green signal. LPIs increase pedestrian safety by allowing pedestrians to assert their presence in intersection spaces before vehicles have an opportunity to start their movement.
LPIs were considered as an improvement for a few intersections during the development of the SSAR.
They are included as part of this LRSP based on a recommendation by a community member during the community workshop as well as inclusion of a recommendation in previously completed city plans, including the Wildomar Active Transportation Plan.
While this LRSP does not have a finalized list of LPI locations, different locations were evaluated to determine candidate locations where LPI installation should be considered. LPIs were evaluated for all signalized intersections falling along “District” or “Corridor” pedestrian routes as indicated by the Wildomar Active Transportation Plan. These intersections were further judged based on the following criteria:
• Existing pedestrian counts (as given in the Existing Conditions Report for the Wildomar Mobility Plan)
• Existing collision data
• Suitability to LPI based on intersection geometry and traffic volumes 173
Engineering Recommendations
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 13
Attachment C includes the list of LPI candidate locations selected as the result of this process.
Attachment D includes a map showing the candidate locations. Attachment E includes all locations evaluated for LPI, the counts and collision information for each location, and the rationale as to why the location was included in the final list or not.
5.2.2 FLASHING BEACONS
Flashing beacons can increase visibility of upcoming signals or stop signs after a long stretch of road without these improvements. Both city staff members and community members identified these countermeasures as benefitting safety in the City. Currently, the City has beacons on both sides of David A. Brown Middle School and a beacon along southbound Mission Trail at Palomar Street, which can serve as models for further installations in the City. It is recommended that the City evaluate potential locations based on a combination of analyzing factors like speed and distance from other intersections as well as responses to citizen requests.
5.3 OTHER LOCATIONS OF CONCERN
Other concerns were discussed during the community workshop for the LRSP. For some concern areas, existing city projects are anticipated to address the concern and/or the projects that would address these concerns are not systemic safety improvements of the kind typically covered by an LRSP. These concerns are summarized below.
5.3.1 CLINTON KEITH ROAD
During the community workshop, several comments pertained to concerns about current conditions on Clinton Keith Road. According to the Wildomar Mobility Plan, Clinton Keith Road is an urban arterial road connecting to the Interstate 15 (I-15) and Interstate 215 (I-215) freeways and has the highest amount of average daily traffic in the City. Widening Clinton Keith Road is included in the Wildomar LRSP as CIP No. 025-1. The goal of the project is to provide four travel lanes and bike lanes through the project limits. The project primarily expands the roadway to four lanes from Wildomar Trail to the eastern city limits. This project is actively in development and seeking funding.
5.3.2 CLINTON KEITH ROAD & PALOMAR STREET
Some concerns were expressed during the community workshop about Clinton Keith Road and Palomar Street. CIP 059 is an active project in the City's 5-Year CIP and the goal of the project is to provide continuous bike and pedestrian facilities on both sides of Palomar Street from McVicar Street to Clinton Keith Road, provide missing sidewalks on the south side of Clinton Keith Road at Stable Lanes Road, and widen Palomar Street and Clinton Keith Road within the project limits. In addition, the City reviewed and updated the pedestrian crosswalk timing in April 2022 at Clinton Keith Road and Palomar Street to provide for longer pedestrian crossing times. These improvements began construction in July 2022. 174
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 14
6.0 NON-ENGINEERING STRATEGIES
The following non-engineering strategies were developed based on a combination of stakeholder input as well as best practices related to citywide safety programs. Programs and strategies are provided for education, enforcement, and emergency services.
6.1 EDUCATION
The following proposed education strategies help to meet safety goals in the City, as given by stakeholders and informed by the collision analysis of the SSAR. They are grouped by the emphasis area that each strategy falls under.
6.1.1 PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS
● Support adult bicycle rider skills classes to take place in the City, such as those offered by the League of American Bicyclists.
● Offer student pedestrian and bicycle traffic safety education in schools. Lessons related to walking can include the danger of walking with distractions, while bicycle lessons can include instructions on helmet and bicycle fit, and teaching how to ride safely on the roadway with motorists. ● Develop a traffic safety campaign. For instance, “walk and bike smart,” or ride in the same direction as traffic.
● Offer free bicycle helmets or lights at schools or community centers. ● Organize festivities for and promote Bike to Work Month/Walk to School Day. ● Work with schools to determine no stopping/drop-off zones.
6.1.2 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)
● With cooperation from Lake Elsinore Unified School District, incorporate education about driving under the influence into the high school curriculum, such as “Every 15 Minutes”, a two-day program that challenges high school juniors and seniors to think critically about drinking and driving.
6.1.3 UNSAFE SPEED
• Install speed feedback signs near schools.
Table 6.1 summarizes the recommendations for educational programs and provides recommended funding sources.
Table 6.1: Education Funding Sources
DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
AGENCY
FUNDING
SOURCE
PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS
Support adult bicycle riding skills classes. City of Wildomar, League of American Bicyclists OTS Grants
175
Non-Engineering Strategies
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 15
DESCRIPTION
RESPONSIBLE
AGENCY
FUNDING
SOURCE
Offer student pedestrian and bicycle traffic safety
education.
Lake Elsinore Unified School
District OTS Grants
Develop a traffic safety campaign. City of Wildomar OTS Grants Offer free bike helmets or lights. City of Wildomar OTS Grants Bike to Work Month/Walk to School Day
City of Wildomar, Lake
Elsinore Unified School
District
OTS Grants
Work with schools to determine no stopping zones.
City of Wildomar, Lake
Elsinore Unified School
District
OTS Grants
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)
High school educational program. Lake Elsinore Unified School District
OTS Grants,
California
Highway Patrol
UNSAFE SPEED
Install speed feedback signs near schools. City of Wildomar, Riverside County Sheriff’s Department
OTS Grants,
California
Highway Patrol
6.2 ENFORCEMENT
The following proposed enforcement strategies help to meet safety goals in the City as given by stakeholders and informed by the collision analysis of the SSAR. They are grouped by the emphasis area that each strategy falls under.
6.2.1 UNSAFE SPEED
● Install radar speed feedback signs or portable trailers at periodic intervals along arterials with reported speeding. These technologies display passing drivers’ travel speed below a sign with the posted speed limit, thus showing whether drivers are traveling over the speed limit. ● Re-evaluate funding a second motor vehicle officer with available tax funds.
6.2.2 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)
● Monitor local liquor stores and bars suspected of selling alcohol to minors.
Table 6.2 summarizes the recommendations for enforcement programs above and provides recommended funding sources.
176
Non-Engineering Strategies
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 16
Table 6.2: Enforcement Funding Sources
DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE
AGENCY
FUNDING
SOURCE
UNSAFE SPEED
Install Active Speed Monitors or Speed
Trailers at periodic intervals along
arterials with reported speeding.
City of Wildomar
OTS Grants, Advanced
Transportation and
Congestion Management
Technologies Deployment
Program
Add a second motor vehicle officer for
enforcement. City of Wildomar Incoming tax funds or other funds available to Wildomar
DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)
Monitor local liquor stores and bars
suspected of selling alcohol to minors.
Riverside County Sheriff’s
Department OTS Grants
6.3 EMERGENCY RESPONSE
The City has contracted with CalFIRE/Riverside County Fire Department to provide all fire and emergency medical service needs. Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) systems are currently provided in the City via Opticom systems. Signal preemption allows emergency vehicles to interrupt a normal signal cycle in order to proceed through the intersection more quickly and under safer conditions. An EVP system may assist emergency vehicles traveling through traffic prone areas when responding to an emergency call. If there are issues with EVP due to a lack of line of sight, Cal FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department has previously used GPS technology through GTT Communications to resolve these difficulties.
Based on feedback from chiefs, the following recommendations were provided to improve emergency response in the City:
● Implement GPS technology on Clinton Keith Road.
● Connect Refa Street and Charles Street to Palomar Street to improve response times (streets currently do not connect).
● Install a traffic signal with Opticom at Grand Avenue and Gruwell Street to help the engine and squad transition quicker. Note: This signal is being currently upgraded by CIP 028-2 (Palomar Widening, Phase 2)
● Connect and pave Elizabeth Lane to Prielipp Road so response times decrease to Gable Oaks Apartments (alternatively, pave Jana Lane to Prielipp Road). Note: Both roads are currently being improved by development projects.
● There is a secondary road that intersects with Waite Street also called Waite Street. It forms the south leg of a three-way intersection, between Bonnie Lane and Linda Vista Lane. This is confusing, 177
Non-Engineering Strategies
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 17
therefore, change the north/south Waite Street to either “ Waite Drive” or “Waite Lane” to better improve address recognition.
● Pave any public dirt road that could potentially provide connectivity to other public paved roads, such as White Street.
● Fix the current Opticom to an all red at Mission Trail and Bundy Canyon Road.
While specific dedicated funding sources are not available for many of these improvements, the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) does provide funding for emergency vehicle pre-emption systems.
While the City currently does utilize these systems on many signals, the request above to install a new signal with an emergency pre-emption system can be considered eligible for HSIP funding. This project is included in the list of HSIP eligible projects in the engineering section in Attachment A.
178
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 18
7.0 EVALUATION
Since the Local Roadway Safety Plan aims to reduce collision risk, performance effectiveness for the Plan may be evaluated through collision reduction. To this end, the City of Wildomar should download collision data from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) via RoadSafe on an annual basis. The collision trends following the LRSP’s adoption provide indicators of the plan’s success. The collision analysis should break out collisions by the following categories, as defined by the emphasis area.
● Overall: Total collisions, KSI collisions.
● Cross-Jurisdictional Collaboration: Collisions occurring on Mission Trail (Malaga Road to Corydo n Road), Corydon Road (whole extent), and Grand Avenue (Richard Lane to Corydon Road). ● Night Collisions and Collisions with Objects: Collisions that occurred at night, collisions with objects, collisions with objects that occurred at night.
● Pedestrians and Bicyclists: Pedestrian collisions, Bicyclist collisions. ● Speeding: Collisions caused by unsafe speed.
● Driving Under the Influence (DUI): Collisions that are caused by drivers under the influence of alcohol.
Table 7.1 lists the safety projects discussed in previous sections of this report and identifies specific collision types to track after implementation of the project based on the countermeasure implemented:
179
Evaluation
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 19
Table 7.1: Collision Types to Monitor for Each Safety Project # Improvement Type Location
Type No. Location Collision Type
Reduced
1 Signal Timing Adjust Signalized
Intersection S03 Clinton Keith Road & Hidden Springs
Road Right-angle
2 Install new traffic signal
Non-
signalized
intersection
NS03 Bundy Canyon Road & Almond Street Right-angle, left- turn, pedestrian
3 Install new traffic signal
Non-
signalized
intersection
NS03
Grand Avenue & Gruwell Street
Right-angle, left-
turn, pedestrian
Add intersection lighting
Non-
signalized
intersection
NS01 Night
Install emergency
vehicle pre-emption
system
Signalized
Intersection S05 Emergency Vehicle
4a
Add segment lighting Roadway
segment R01
Grand Avenue from Corydon Road to
Richard Lane Night
4b Mission Trail from Malaga Road to
Corydon Road Night
4c Mission Trail from Corydon Road to
Bundy Canyon Road Night
4d Clinton Keith Road from Stable Lanes
Road to Elizabeth Lane Night
The City can also check collision statistics published by the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS). For each of the categories, consider calculating an average for the most recent three years every year. The City can then plot the three-year average against the averages for past years to derive a general trend line. A downward- sloping trend line indicates that the LRSP is working. An upward sloping trend line suggests that LRSP programs do not have their intended outcomes. In the latter instance, the City should conduct further review and update the plan.
The City should also evaluate the internal safety process. The City can ask the following questions:
• Who is responsible for implementing safety programs?
• What are the roles and responsibilities of different departments of the City? • What is the regularity of monitoring and updating performance data? • How are safety projects prioritized?
• How is progress measured on longer-term projects?
180
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 20
8.0 IMPLEMENTATION
This section presents program implementation – identifying the time frame, responsible agencies, and measures of progress for each project and program. The metrics for evaluating the overall effectiveness and equity of the emphasis areas are summarized in this section.
8.1 ENGINEERING PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
Projects are sorted into three categories: short, medium, and long. The graphic below summarizes what these three terms mean.
Short-term projects are projects that can typically be done from general city funding and maintenance, and are not recommended as candidates for external funding. Medium-term projects are projects that should be prioritized for the near future as soon when funding is available. Long-term projects are not easy to implement and may require several steps before implementation is possible. This LRSP mostly recommends short and medium term projects, as the focus is not on major public works projects that would typically fit into the long-term category.
For cost, low cost projects typically cost less than $100,000, medium cost projects range from $100,000 to $500,000, and high cost projects tend to be greater than $500,000.
Table 8.1 below breaks down each engineering project in the LRSP by whether the project can be considered short-, medium-, or long-term, and whether they are low, medium, or high cost.
181
Implementation
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 21
Table 8.1: Implementation Categories for LRSP Safety Projects # Improvement Type Location
Type No. Location Term Cost
1 Signal Timing Adjust* Signalized
Intersection S03 Clinton Keith Road & Hidden Springs
Road Short Low
2 Install new traffic signal
Non-
signalized
intersection
NS03 Bundy Canyon Road & Almond Street Medium Medium
3 Install new traffic signal
Non-
signalized
intersection
NS03
Grand Avenue & Gruwell Street
Long Medium
Add intersection lighting
Non-
signalized
intersection
NS01 Short Low
Install emergency
vehicle pre-emption
system
Signalized
Intersection S05 Long Medium
4a
Add segment lighting Roadway
segment R01
Grand Avenue from Corydon Road to
Richard Lane Medium High
4b Mission Trail from Malaga Road to
Corydon Road Medium High
4c Mission Trail from Corydon Road to
Bundy Canyon Road Medium High
4d Clinton Keith Road from Stable Lanes
Road to Elizabeth Lane Medium High
8.2 NON-INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE
Different non-infrastructure programs and strategies are also included in the LRSP. To facilitate implementation of these programs, guidance on first steps for each strategy discussed above is included in the table below. Both education and enforcement programs and strategies are included, and they are separated by the target emphasis area in Table 8.2.
182
Implementation
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 22
Table 8.2: Implementation Guidance for LRSP Non-engineering Programs
DESCRIPTION FIRST STEPS
FUNDING
SOURCE
PEDESTRIANS AND
BICYCLISTS
Support adult bicycle riding
skills classes.
- Determine what kind of adult bicycle riding skills
classes are currently offered.
- Identify any existing adult bicycle riding skills classes in the Wildomar community (check-in with the Community
Services Department and Community-Based
Organizations since they sometimes offer bicycle riding courses).
- Retain a consultant to develop a customized
curriculum based on the community’s needs and
collaborate with Community-Based Organizations/
Community Partners to host the events to better
promote the classes to a broader audience.
OTS Grants
Offer student pedestrian and
bicycle traffic safety education.
- Coordinate with Lake Elsinore Unified School District and individual schools in the City to gain an
understanding of existing traffic safety activities/ Safe Routes to School activities.
- With the help of a consultant, collaborate with the
school district/ schools to develop traffic safety
activities.
OTS Grants
Develop a traffic safety
campaign
-Determine a behavioral challenge (for instance, texting while driving) to highlight.
-Develop a branding and a marketing strategy.
(SCAG offers free traffic safety co-branding material and assistance for hosting traffic safety campaigns through the Go Human program).
OTS Grants
Offer free bike helmets or
lights.
-Apply for an OTS grant to fund a giveaway.
-Identify locations or events where the giveaway can
take place.
OTS Grants
183
Implementation
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 23
DESCRIPTION FIRST STEPS
FUNDING
SOURCE
Organize festivities for and
promote Bike to Work
Month/Walk to School Day
-Coordinate with Lake Elsinore Unified School District
and individual schools in the city to promote walking
and biking through popular nationwide encouragement
events such as Bike to Work Month or Walk to School
Day.
OTS Grants
Work with schools to determine
no stopping zones.
-Conduct a walk audit at schools with concerned
parents and identify locations where there may be pick- up/drop-off issues.
-Confirm locations for no stopping zones with City
engineering staff.
OTS Grants
DRIVING UNDER THE
INFLUENCE (DUI)
Establish an interactive
simulation program for high
school students – Every 15
Minutes. The interactive
simulation program aims to
challenge high school juniors
and seniors about drinking,
driving, and mature decision-
making.
-Review what alcohol related education is currently
taking place in schools in Wildomar.
-Determine if there are any recent programs that would
be helpful to add to the curriculum.
OTS Grants, California
Highway Patrol
Monitor local liquor stores and
bars suspected of selling
alcohol to minors.
-Identify liquor stores located near DUI collisions and citations.
-Determine existing enforcement policy regarding sales
to minors and identify ways to target areas where
infractions occur.
OTS Grants
UNSAFE SPEED
Install speed feedback signs
near schools.
-Conduct a walk audit with parents or teachers and
determine issues where speeding is occurring.
-Determine where collisions have occurred near schools
and develop an OTS application.
OTS Grants, California
Highway Patrol
Install Active Speed Monitors or
Speed Trailers at periodic
intervals along arterials with
-Work with Riverside County Sheriff’s Department to
identify locations with speeding issues.
OTS Grants, Advanced
Transportation and
Congestion
Management
184
Implementation
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 24
DESCRIPTION FIRST STEPS
FUNDING
SOURCE
reported speeding. -Apply for an OTS grant to fund speed trailers. Develop a deployment strategy.
Technologies
Deployment Program
8.2.1 FUNDING INFORMATION
The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Safe Streets for All (SS4A) program offers grants to jurisdictions with roadway safety projects. To be eligible for Implementation Plan grants through SS4A, jurisdictions must have an Action Plan that meets a set of requirements, which this LRSP, with its appendices, is intended to satisfy.
California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grants are offered on a regular basis, typically annually. The most recent request for grant applications closed on January 31, 2022. The grant funds programs related to the following primary program areas:
• Alcohol Impaired Driving
• Distracted Driving
• Drug-Impaired Driving
• Emergency Medical Services
• Motorcycle Safety
• Occupant Protection
• Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety
• Police Traffic Services
• Public Relations, Advertising, and Marketing Program
• Roadway Safety and Traffic Records
Grant applications should establish a problem to be addressed in the respective city via documented traffic safety data and propose non-engineering strategies to address this problem. More information on the grants can be found at https://www.ots.ca.gov/grants/ .
185
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 25
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Wildomar LRSP Safety Projects Eligible for HSIP Funding
186
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 26 Attachment B: Location of Safety Projects Eligible for HSIP Funding
187
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 27 Attachment C: Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Candidate Projects
188
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 28 Attachment D: Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Candidate Locations
189
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN PAGE 29 Attachment E: Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Candidate Evaluation
190
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 1 APPENDIX A – EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS
191
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
2.0 EQUITY ANALYSIS 2
2.1 Background Concerns ................................................................................................................................................................. 2
2.2 Data Findings .................................................................................................................................................................................. 2
3.0 POLICY SUMMARY 12
3.1 Wildomar Mobility Element ................................................................................................................................................... 12
3.2 Wildomar Active Transportation Plan ................................................................................................................................ 12
3.3 County of Riverside General Plan (2003, last amended in 2020) ............................................................................. 13
3.4 SCAG Connect SoCal 2020-2045 RTP/SCS ....................................................................................................................... 13
3.5 WRCOG Western Riverside Active Transportation Plan (2018) ................................................................................ 14
3.6 County of Riverside Elsinore Area Plan (2011, last amended in 2019) .................................................................. 15
3.7 Wildomar Old Town Vision (2013) ...................................................................................................................................... 15
3.8 City of Wildomar Strategic Visioning Plan (2008) ......................................................................................................... 16
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1: CalEnviroScreen Index in Wildomar ................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2.2: USDOT Historically Disadvantaged Communities in Wildomar ............................................................................ 4 Figure 2.3: USDOT Historically Disadvantaged Communities and Recommended Countermeasures ......................... 5 Figure 2.4: USDOT Historically Disadvantaged Communities and LPI Candidate Locations ............................................ 7 Figure 2.5: Missing Sidewalk Inventory .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Figure 2.6: Existing Bicycle Network .................................................................................................................................................... 11
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Recommended Countermeasures in Historically Disadvantaged Communities .............................................. 6 Table 2.2: LPI Candidate Locations in Historically Disadvantaged Communities ................................................................. 8 Table 2.3: Vehicle Availability by Household ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Table 2.4: Means of Transportation to Work ...................................................................................................................................... 9
192
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 1
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This document is built upon the City of Wildomar’s Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP), which is intended to identify, analyze, and prioritize roadway safety improvements in the City. The LRSP and accompanying Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR) collectively serve the function of examining collision patterns, incorporating stakeholder input, evaluating potential programming measures, and making a set of engineering recommendations for improvement projects. This report is intended to serve as an addendum to the LRSP by providing findings related to equity and policy to inform safety program and project recommendations.
193
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 2
2.0 EQUITY ANALYSIS
The purpose of this equity analysis is to analyze demographic patterns, identify community needs and areas of historic underinvestment, and identify how proposed projects and strategies incorporate improvements to these communities. This equity analysis is built on the previous work of the Wildomar Active Transportation Plan (ATP). Equity analysis is a core element of the SS4A program.
2.1 BACKGROUND CONCERNS
Wildomar is located in the Inland Empire, which has long had poor air quality due to its sunny, dry climate and geographical features that funnel air from the greater Los Angeles area. The Riverside County General Plan states that the South Coast Air Basin, which Wildomar falls under, contains the worst air quality in the nation.
Transportation equity within the City of Wildomar is adversely affected by a limited set of transportation options made available. The City currently has limited pedestrian and bicycle options; however, the city’s Active Transportation Plan and Mobility Element do contain plans to expand this network.
2.2 DATA FINDINGS
Data was analyzed from CalEnviroScreen, an equity mapping tool from the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Historically Disadvantaged Communities metric, and information on transportation mode share and transportation mode access among Wildomar’s residents.
2.2.1 CalEnviroScreen 4.0
CalEnviroScreen is a mapping tool that helps identify California communities that are most affected by many sources of pollution. It uses a variety of metrics to produce a composite score that indicates the amount of burden faced by a community due to environmental factors. Wildomar’s census tracts range from the 25
th percentile to the 60th percentile, with the Sedco Hills community in the northern edge of the city having the highest percentile. This percentile means that Sedco Hills is more adversely affected by CalEnviroScreen indicates than 60 percent of California’s census tracts.
194
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 3
Figure 2.1: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Index in Wildomar
Source: California OEHHA
CalEnviroScreen takes a number of metrics into account. Wildomar, like the rest of the Inland Empire, has substantially high ozone concentration levels, with all census tracts at least being in the 70th percentile or higher (among the state) for ozone concentration. In addition, multiple census tracts in the City are above the 60th percentile for diesel particulate matter concentraction.
2.2.2 USDOT Historically Disadvantaged Communities
The U.S. Department of Transportation has developed a metric for determining which Census tracts can be considered historically disadvantaged. This USDOT metric combines multiple datasets from agencies such as CDC, US Census Bureau, and EPA to arrive at an aggregate score for individual Census tracts. This score is an aggregate of the following categories:
1) Transportation access
2) Health
3) Environmental (pollution)
4) Economic
5) Resilience (vulnerability to climate change)
6) Equity (including language proficiency)
According to USDOT, disadvantaged Census tracts have scores exceeding the 50 th percentile (75th
percentile for resilience) in at least four of these individual categories.
195
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 4
Figure 2.2: USDOT Historically Disadvantaged Communities in Wildomar
All but three census tracts in the City of Wildomar meet the threshold for a Historically Disadvantaged Community by USDOT.
196
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 5
Figure 2.3: USDOT Historically Disadvantaged Communities and Recommended Countermeasures
All recommended projects in this LRSP are in some part contained in a Historically Disadvantaged census tract.
197
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 6
Table 2.1: Recommended Countermeasures in Historically Disadvantaged Communities # Improvement Type Location
Type No. Location
Historically
Disadvantaged
Community?
1 Signal Timing Adjust Signalized
Intersection S03 Clinton Keith Road & Hidden Springs
Road Y (partially)
2 Install new traffic signal
Non-
signalized
intersection
NS03 Bundy Canyon Road & Almond Street Y (fully)
3 Install new traffic signal
Non-
signalized
intersection
NS03
Grand Avenue & Gruwell Street
Y (fully)
Add intersection lighting
Non-
signalized
intersection
NS01 Y (fully)
Install emergency
vehicle pre-emption
system
Signalized
Intersection S05 Y (fully)
4a
Add segment lighting Roadway
segment R01
Grand Avenue from Corydon Road to
Richard Lane Y (fully)
4b Mission Trail from Malaga Road to
Corydon Road Y (fully)
4c Mission Trail from Corydon Road to
Bundy Canyon Road Y (fully)
4d Clinton Keith Road from Stable Lanes
Road to Elizabeth Lane Y (partially)
198
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 7
Figure 2.4: USDOT Historically Disadvantaged Communities and LPI Candidate Locations
All Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) candidate locations are located, at least in some part, in a Historically Disadvantaged Community.
199
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 8
Table 2.2: LPI Candidate Locations in Historically Disadvantaged Communities Improvement Type Location
Type No. Location
Historically
Disadvantaged
Community?
Leading Pedestrian
Interval
Signalized
Intersection S21PB
Clinton Keith Road & Palomar Street Y (partially)
Clinton Keith Road & Hidden Springs
Road Y (partially)
Clinton Keith Road & Arya Road Y (partially)
Clinton Keith Road & Wildomar Trail Y (partially)
Mission Trail & Malaga Road Y (fully)
Mission Trail & Elberta Road Y (fully)
Mission Trail & Olive Street Y (fully)
Mission Trail & Corydon Road Y (fully)
Mission Trail & Bundy Canyon Road Y (fully)
Bundy Canyon Drive & Orange Street Y (fully)
Corydon Road & Palomar Street Y (fully)
Wildomar Trail & Palomar Street Y (fully)
2.2.3 Vulnerable Population Groups
Wildomar has a heavily car-dependent transportation network. The Wildomar Active Transportation Plan contains information about vehicle availability by household. Information on vehicle availability and primary transportation modes in the City can reveal vulnerabilities that affect residents’ ability to access their needs. Table 2.3 shows vehicle availability by household, while Table 2.4 shows means of transportation to work.
200
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 9
Table 2.3: Vehicle Availability by Household
Vehicles Available Households Percent of Total
No Vehicle Available 366 3.7%
1 Vehicle Available 2,001 20.1%
2 Vehicles Available 3,734 37.6%
3 or more Vehicles Available 3,834 38.6%
Total Occupied Housing Units 9,935 100%
Source: City of Wildomar Active Transportation Plan
Table 2.4: Means of Transportation to Work
Means of Transportation to Work Wildomar Riverside County Drove Alone 78.9% 77.2%
Carpooled 14.7% 12.9%
Public Transportation 0.7% 1.3%
Walked 0.6% 1.6%
Bicycle 0.2% 0.3%
Other 1.5% 1.4%
Worked from Home 3.4% 5.2%
Total 100% 100%
Source: City of Wildomar Active Transportation Plan
These findings illustrate a lack of non-driving options in Wildomar. With 20 percent of households owning one vehicle, this leaves a vulnerability in the event that car access is temporarily or permanently disrupted. In total, nearly 1 in 4 households in Wildomar have access to one vehicle or no vehicles. Only
3.4 percent of Wildomar residents work from home, which may be indicative of employment types in the City that require in-person attendance.
2.1.4 Active Transportation Network Gaps
The City of Wildomar contains approximately 62.9 linear miles when counting both directions of roadways. Of these 62.9 miles, there are approximately 18 miles of existing sidewalk and approximately 45 miles (72%) of missing sidewalks. Sidewalk infill will become an important step toward building a robust pedestrian mobility network. Missing sidewalks create gaps that result in potential safety challenges for youth, people traveling in wheelchairs, people using mobility assistive devices, and for people pushing strollers. Providing residents with a safer and more comfortable pedestrian environment by building more sidewalks with Americans with Disability Act (ADA) compliant curb ramps will be critical to improving walkability in Wildomar. Figure 2.5 shows missing sidewalks in the City of Wildomar.
201
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 10
Figure 2.5: Missing Sidewalk Inventory
Source: City of Wildomar Active Transportation Plan
Existing bicycle facilities are displayed in Figure 2.6. The existing bicycle network in the City of Wildomar consists primarily of Class II bike lanes, though there is a small section of a Class III bike route, and a block of a Class IV cycle track. Bike lanes are found along Grand Avenue from the northern city limits to Clinton Keith Road, and along Clinton Keith Road from Grand Avenue to Wildomar Trail. The Clinton Keith Road bridge deck over I-15 is a Class III bike route. Clinton Keith Road has an approximately one- block segment of a Class IV cycle track facility. This facility is located on eastbound Clinton Keith Road in front of the northern end of Renaissance Plaza (approximately 400 feet south of the intersection of Clinton Keith Road and Stable Lanes Road). It is evident in Figure 2.6 that there are major needs for expansion in the City’s bicycle network.
202
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 11
Figure 2.6: Existing Bicycle Network
Source: City of Wildomar Active Transportation Plan
203
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 12
3.0 POLICY SUMMARY
3.1 WILDOMAR MOBILITY ELEMENT (2021)
The City of Wildomar Mobility Element is intended to establish a long-range vision for the City’s transportation network. The Element is guided by principles of creating a “safe and active community” with quality infrastructure.
The Element contains the following policies that pertain to roadway safety:
• Policy 1.6: Regularly monitor and evaluate Citywide safety and usage trends for all travel modes.
Additionally, as new infrastructure is implemented, such as bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities, and traffic calming measures, pre- and post-project evaluations should be conducted to better understand project benefits.
• Policy 2.1: Improve pedestrian safety, comfort, and connectivity throughout the City, with an emphasis on implementing the various pedestrian route types, and connections serving schools, parks, and commercial/retail centers.
• Policy 2.3: Improve pedestrian crossing safety and efficiency through appropriate signal hardware and timing, installation of marked and high visibility crosswalks and accessible curb ramps, and other intersection design features, where relevant.
• Policy 2.6: Pursue funding to implement programs that promote bicycle and pedestrian education, safety and use in schools.
• Policy 2.8: Regularly review and monitor reports of pedestrian-involved collisions to identify potential safety issues and appropriate improvements.
• Policy 3.5: Enhance bicycle intersection crossing efficiency and safety through intersection design considerations, provisions of bicycle detection at signalized intersections, and other appropriate design features.
The Element also contains a set of treatments, some of which can be found in this LRSP:
• Pedestrian Countdown Signal Heads
• Lighting Improvements
3.2 WILDOMAR ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (2020)
The purpose of the Wildomar Active Transportation Plan is to function as a foundation for bicycle and pedestrian improvements within the City. The Plan embodies a Complete Streets approach that balances the needs of all roadway users, with or without vehicles.
The document considers the safety and comfort of active transportation to be an important factor in establishing a robust mode share. Sidewalk gaps are considered safety issues that disproportionately affect youth, elderly populations, and people with disabilities. Improvements to pedestrian safety appear in policies that include:
• Policy A.1: Improve pedestrian safety, comfort, and connectivity throughout the City, with an emphasis on implementing the various pedestrian route types shown in Figure 4.1, and connections serving schools, parks, and commercial/retail centers. (Similar to Mobility Element Policy 2.1) 204
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 13
• Policy A.6: Pursue funding to implement programs that promote bicycle and pedestrian education, safety and use in schools. (Similar to Mobility Element Policy 2.6) • Policy A.8: Regularly review and monitor reports of pedestrian-involved collisions to identify potential safety issues and appropriate improvements.
The Plan also looks at the current bicycle and pedestrian network and scores each corridor based on a needs assessment. Clinton Keith Road and Mission Trail both appear as locations in need of bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Grand Avenue is listed as a location in moderate need of pedestrian improvements.
3.3 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE GENERAL PLAN (2003, LAST AMENDED IN 2020) The General Plan manages overall patterns of development across the County more effectively, enhances community identity, and improves quality of life. It includes a Circulation Element, which identifies the transportation needs and issues within the County, proposes new circulation systems, considers mobility alternatives other than single-occupant vehicles, establishes policies for future decision-making, and develops implementation strategies. The Circulation Element’s vision is to achieve new and expanded transportation corridors that connect growth centers at key locations throughout the County, especially with various forms of public transit. This is consistent with Riverside County’s Vision.
As stated in the Riverside County Vision and Land Use Element, the County is moving away from sprawling growth toward a pattern of concentrated growth and increased job creation. The intent of these new land development patterns and mobility systems is to accommodate the transportation demands created by future growth and to provide mobility options that reduce automobile reliance, which may include active transportation modes.
Pertaining to roadway safety, the Plan notes the following policies:
• Allow innovative design solutions to manage traffic flow and improve safety when physically and economically feasible.
• Improve roadways in mountainous and rural areas to adequately meet safety requirements. • Restrict on-street parking to decrease traffic congestion and improve safety. • Design and construct trails that properly account for such issues as sensitive habitat areas, cultural resources, flooding potential, access to neighborhoods and open space, safety, alternate land uses, and usefulness for both transportation and recreation.
• All trails along roadways shall be appropriately signed to identify safety hazards, and shall incorporate equestrian crossing signals, mileage markers, and other safety features, as appropriate. • Install special turning lanes whenever necessary to relieve congestion and improve safety.
3.4 SCAG CONNECT SOCAL 2020-2045 RTP/SCS
Connect SoCal is SCAG’s long-range transportation plan and sustainable communities strategy for a 6- county region, which includes Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura and Imperial counties.
The purpose of the SCAG Connect SoCal Plan is to establish a long-term cohesive regional vision for the build-out of the transportation network within the SCAG region (which includes San Bernardino County).
It notes the following about traffic safety:
205
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 14
• Unsafe speed is the primary collision factor in the SCAG region, accounting for about 30 percent of collisions.
• Approximately 90 percent of collisions are occurring in urban areas, with most taking place on local roads, not highways.
• 65% of fatalities and serious injuries occur on less than 1.5% of the region’s roadway network. • The active transportation investments in Connect SoCal are allocated across a range of active transportation strategies that address planning, policy making and implementation for both short and regional trips. Additionally, they are designed to improve environmental justice outcomes and enhance the safety and comfort of people walking and bicycling.
3.5 WRCOG WESTERN RIVERSIDE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (2018) WRCOG adopted the Western Riverside Active Transportation Plan (ATP) in 2018. This ATP focuses on enhancing non-motorized infrastructure throughout the western Riverside region, in hopes of developing a robust network for people who walk and bike. The ATP is also intended to serve as a resource for WRCOG member jurisdictions and stakeholders to identify important active transportation facilities in their community.
The ATP provides an overview of the existing conditions in the region, with a focus on non-motorized modes of transportation. It presents an overview of the proposed active transportation regional network, with background information on the development process and its relation to other WRCOG projects.
Implementation and funding strategies relevant to the entire region are also included.
The goals for this ATP were set in conjunction with state and federal vehicle miles traveled reduction efforts, the WRCOG Sustainability Framework, and GHG reduction objectives outlined in Riverside County’s Climate Action Plan. Of the five goals, one pertains to roadway safety:
• Enhance safety, remove barriers to access, and correct unsafe conditions in areas of traffic and bicycle/pedestrian activity.
Pertaining to roadway safety, the plan writes, “The safety of bicyclists and pedestrians is one of the most importance aspects of active transportation planning for the Western Riverside County”, and considers “Improved Level of Traffic Stress and safety” as a potential outcome of the ATP implementation. Safety strategies include the following:
• Locate routes along high visibility corridors that contain a mix of commercial, civic/institutional (schools, hospitals), recreational, and community facilities and away from blighted structures or sites.
This strategy, called “context-sensitive design”, directly serves the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians and can enhance public safety for all through the related “eyes on the street” concept. • Enforce proper and safe driving, bicycling, and walking practices and habits. • Build bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure that is removed, separated, or buffered from automobiles. • Provide adequate and consistent lighting along active transportation facilities. • Install bicycle “fix-it” stations equipped with an emergency communication system on off-street, long-distance pathways.
• Update the infrastructure capital improvement project list to prioritize projects that would proactively address areas with substantial pedestrian or bicyclist-involved collision history. 206
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 15
• Conduct targeted enforcement efforts, with citations and educational materials that focus on safe and lawful behavior for all road users. Enforcement can be targeted at areas such as schools, public facilities, and locations with demonstrated collision history. • Monitor, record, and regularly review bicyclist and pedestrian-involved collisions. • Where bike theft occurs regularly (i.e., schools, downtown areas), consider additional law enforcement presence or a standard reporting and documenting process for bicycle theft.
3.6 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ELSINORE AREA PLAN (2011, LAST AMENDED IN 2019) The Elsinore Area Plan is one of nineteen area plans developed by the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) in conjunction with the Riverside County General Plan. The RCIP general vision for the County and incorporated areas is to achieve economic growth and long-term development in an environmentally sustainable manner. The RCIP also sets forth a vision for Riverside County as being “a family of special communities in a remarkable environmental setting”.
The Elsinore Area Plan includes a circulation section with programs and policies specific to the area, but also coordinated with the goals of the General Plan Circulation Element. These policies include future recommendations for the following mobility components:
• Vehicular Circulation System. The plan proposes a circulation system comprised of six roadway typologies.
• Trails System. The plan recommends an extensive system of trails and bikeways to connect the various neighborhoods with recreational resources found in the Cleveland National Forest and along the regional trail system.
• Scenic Highways. The plan seeks to protect Interstate 15 and State Route 74, designated as Eligible State Scenic Highways, from changes that would diminish the aesthetic value of adjacent properties. • Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) Corridors. The plan recommends consistency with CETAP, which has identified four priority corridors in the area:
Winchester to Temecula, East-West CETAP, Moreno Valley to San Bernardino, and Riverside County – Orange County. They are envisioned to be developed in accordance with the CETAP section of the Riverside County General Plan Circulation Element.
• I-15 Corridor. The plan proposes enhancing this corridor by expanding automobile and truck capacity, as well as providing a critical north-south link for transit within and outside the County of Riverside.
3.7 WILDOMAR OLD TOWN VISION (2013)
The Wildomar City Council approved the Wildomar Old Town Vision in April 2013. The City identified the intersection of Central and Palomar streets as a site with historical community significance, known as the core of Wildomar Old Town.
The project began with an effort to guide private development and public investments in the historic core of the community. The project was funded by a grant from SCAG’s Compass Blueprint Demonstration Project Program. Wildomar’s vision for the Old Town is to enhance its role as the historic center of the community with the introduction of pedestrian-oriented development, places for gathering, and trails.
Three key objectives of the vision are as follows:
207
CITY OF WILDOMAR | APPENDIX A – WILDOMAR LRSP EQUITY AND SAFETY POLICY ANALYSIS PAGE 16
• Creating a walkable town center with gathering places. • Providing economic opportunities.
• Strengthening a sense of history and community identity.
In order to achieve this vision, the document calls for streetscape amenities such as wide (up to 10’) sidewalks and traffic calming measures. The document proposes pedestrian-friendly development along the project areas.
3.8 CITY OF WILDOMAR STRATEGIC VISIONING PLAN (2008)
The City of Wildomar conducted a strategic visioning session on October 25, 2008. Approximately 100 citizens participated in sharing their vision and brainstorming about the City’s future. The attendees were divided into groups and assigned a topic. Facilitators were assigned to each group to record the discussion. Each group reported back at the end of the discussion period, sharing the ideas that emerged. The Visioning Plan concludes by summarizing the themes which were heard and calling upon the citizenry to stay involved.
One of the topics assigned was Traffic Enforcement. On the subject, the Plan writes:
• There are areas where speeding is an issue and the use of speed bumps may be required. Red light cameras could also be installed at selected sites to catch those in violation. Street racing is another area where enforcement will need to be monitored to [ensure] citizen safety.
208
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX I APPENDIX B – 2021 WILDOMAR SYSTEMIC SAFETY
ANALYSIS REPORT (SSAR)
209
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX II
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 1
2.0 SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 3
2.1 Safety Data Utilized ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Ranking Function ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Average Crash Frequency ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Crash Rate......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 EPDO Scores ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Data Analysis Results ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Collision Severity............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Collision Type ................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Lighting Condition .......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Involved Parties ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Primary Collision Factor (PCF) ................................................................................................................................................... 7
3.0 HIGH RISK CORRIDORS AND INTERSECTIONS ...................................................................9
3.1 General Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 9
3.2 Intersection Analysis Method .................................................................................................................. 11
1. Mission Trail and Olive Street ............................................................................................................................................. 13
2. Bundy Canyon Road and Orange Street ......................................................................................................................... 15
3. Lemon Street and Mission Trail .......................................................................................................................................... 18
4. Corydon Road and Mission Trail ........................................................................................................................................ 20
5. Gruwell Street and Palomar Street ................................................................................................................................... 22
6. Bundy Canyon Road and Cherry Street ........................................................................................................................... 24
8. Bryant Street and Palomar Street ...................................................................................................................................... 25
9. Bundy Canyon Road and Sunset Avenue ........................................................................................................................ 28
10. Bundy Canyon Road and Harvest Way ......................................................................................................................... 29
11. Grand Avenue and Sheila Lane ....................................................................................................................................... 31
3.3 Roadway Segment Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 32
1. Corydon Road from Mission Trail to Grand Avenue ................................................................................................... 34
2. Mission Trail from Malaga Road to Corydon Road ..................................................................................................... 39
3. Orange Street - Gruwell Street from Bundy Canyon Road to Grand Avenue ..................................................... 41
4. Palomar Street from Wildomar Trail (Central Street) to Southern City Limit ..................................................... 41
4.0 SAFETY PROJECTS ................................................................................................................... 46
4.1 Project Scopes and Benefit Calculations ............................................................................................. 46
4.2 Cost Estimate ................................................................................................................................................. 57
4.3 Benefit/Cost (B/C) Ratio ............................................................................................................................ 57
4.4 Project Prioritization ................................................................................................................................... 63
210
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX III
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1: Intersections with Proposed Safety Countermeasures ............................................................ 13 Figure 3.2: An Aerial View of the intersection of Mission Trail and Olive Street ................................ 14 Figure 3.3: Faded Crosswalks at Mission Trail and Olive Street ................................................................ 15 Figure 3.4: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Orange Street ............. 16 Figure 3.5: Non ADA-Compliant Pedestrian Push Buttons .......................................................................... 17 Figure 3.6: Faded “No U-turn” Sign of Southbound Traffic on Orange Street ..................................... 18 Figure 3.7: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Lemon Street and Mission Trail .............................. 19 Figure 3.8: Non-Compliant STOP Pavement Marking Located at Mission Trail and Lemon Street ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 Figure 3.9: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Corydon Road and Mission Trail ............................ 21 Figure 3.10: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Gruwell Street and Palomar Street ...................... 23 Figure 3.11: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Cherry Street ............ 24 Figure 3.12: Sight Distance Blocked by Mud Mound for Vehicles Turning out of Cherry Street .. 25 Figure 3.13: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Bryant Street and Palomar Street ........................ 26 Figure 3.14: Missing Stop Sign and Pavement Markings on the Bryant Street North of Palomar Street ................................................................................................................................................................................. 27 Figure 3.15: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Sunset Avenue ......... 28 Figure 3.16: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Harvest Way ............. 30 Figure 3.17: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Grand Avenue and Sheila Lane ............................ 31 Figure 3.18: City of Wildomar Roadway Segment Map ................................................................................. 32 Figure 3.19: Roadway Segments with Proposed Safety Countermeasures ............................................ 34 Figure 3.20: A Street View of Bryant Street and Corydon Road ................................................................. 35 Figure 3.21: An Aerial View of Palomar Street and Corydon Road ........................................................... 36 Figure 3.22: An Aerial View of Corydon Road North of Union Street ...................................................... 37 Figure 3.23: An Aerial View of Corydon Road and Grand Avenue ............................................................ 38 Figure 3.24: Street View of Southbound Corydon Road towards Grand Avenue ................................ 39 Figure 3.25: Street View of Mission Trail near Vine Street ............................................................................ 40 Figure 3.26: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Palomar Street and Frederick Street .................. 42 Figure 3.27: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Palomar Street and Catt Road .............................. 43 Figure 3.28: Push Button for Bike Crossing at the Intersection of Palomar Street and Clinton Keith Road .................................................................................................................................................................................. 44 Figure 3.29: An Aerial View of Palomar Street at the Eastern City Limit ................................................. 45
211
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX IV
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Collision Severity by Facility Type ......................................................................................................... 5 Table 2.2: Collision Type by Facility Type ............................................................................................................... 6 Table 2.3: Collision Lighting Condition by Facility Type ................................................................................... 6 Table 2.4: Collision Involved Party by Facility Type ............................................................................................ 7 Table 2.5: Primary Collision Factor by Facility Type ........................................................................................... 8 Table 3.1: Major Safety Countermeasures Applied to Wildomar SSARP ................................................ 11 Table 4.1: Safety Project Scopes ............................................................................................................................. 47 Table 4.2: Benefits/Cost Ratio Analysis by Safety Project ............................................................................. 58 Table 4.3: Prioritized Projects to Consider for HSIP Funding ...................................................................... 64 Table 4.4: Prioritized Projects to Consider for Local Funding ..................................................................... 66
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT A.1 – INTERSECTION RANKING BY COLLISION FREQUENCY ATTACHMENT A.2 – TRAFFIC COUNTS FOR SELECTED INTERSECTIONS ATTACHMENT A.3 – COLLISION DIAGRAMS FOR SELECTED INTERSECTIONS ATTACHMENT A.4 – ROADWAY SEGMENT RANKING BY COLLISION FREQUENCY ATTACHMENT A.5 – TRAFFIC COUNTS FOR SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS ATTACHMENT A.6 – COLLISION DIAGRAMS FOR SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS ATTACHMENT A.7 – CONCEPTS FOR SELECTED PROJECTS
ATTACHMENT A.8 – COLLISION REDUCTION OUTPUT FROM HSIP ANALYZER ATTACHMENT A.9 – SAFETY PROJECT COST ESTIMATION
ATTACHMENT A.10 – SELECTED COLLISION HEATMAPS
212
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 1
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) established the Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP) in 2016 to provide funding for local agencies to identify safety needs and recommend projects to address these needs. Systemic analysis is a proactive safety approach that focuses on evaluating an entire roadway network using a defined set of criteria. It looks at crash history on an aggregate basis to identify high-risk roadway characteristics, rather than looking at high-collision concentration locations through site analysis. Systemic analysis acknowledges that crashes alone are not always sufficient to prioritize countermeasures across a system.
An SSARP analyzes collision data, assesses infrastructure deficiencies through an inventory of roadway system elements, and identifies roadway safety solutions on a citywide basis. The SSARP was created to help local agencies develop safety projects that can be submitted to the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) for funding consideration.
The general content of this SSARP report follows this outline:
• Crash data source and analysis techniques
• Crash data analysis results and highest occurring crash types • High risk corridor and intersection analysis and proposed safety countermeasures • Safety project descriptions and estimated collision reduction benefits • Cost estimates of recommended improvements
• Prioritization of projects based on cost-benefit ratio and effectiveness of safety improvement
This report was prepared in accordance with the Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program Guidelines dated February 2016 and Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM) version 1.4 dated June 2018.
On August 5, 2019, Caltrans’ Division of Local Assistance sent an email to all the agencies that have received SSARP funding, encouraging the possibilities of expanding the SSARP project to develop a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP). An LRSP (or its equivalent, such as an SSARP or a Vision Zero Plan) was highly recommended but not required for an agency to apply for HSIP Cycle 10 (May 2020) grants; and will be required for agencies applying for HSIP Cycle 11 (around April 2022), and all funding cycles thereafter.
213
Executive Summary
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 2 Per the SSARP guidelines, the following language from Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code [23 U.S.C. §148(h) (4)] is included as part of this report:
REPORTS DISCOVERY AND ADMISSION INTO EVIDENCE OF CERTAIN REPORTS, SURVEYS, AND INFORMATION—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section, shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.
By signing and stamping this Systemic Safety Analysis Report, the engineer (Stephen Bise, P.E., KOA Corporation) is attesting to this report’s technical information and engineering data upon which local agency’s recommendation, conclusions, and decisions are made. 214
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 3
2.0 SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS
KOA Corporation (KOA) has been retained by the City of Wildomar to develop a Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR). Traditionally, agencies have selected safety projects based on historical crash records, focusing on sites with a concentration of recent severe collisions. By contrast, SSAR identifies the most common collision categories across a roadway network, so as to target projects that address the factors associated with those categories. By focusing on causal factors rather than collisions, SSAR allows agencies to assess risks before a collision occurs. Targeting a wider geography than the traditional site-based approach, systemic project selection favors the broad implementation of cost-effective countermeasures.
2.1 SAFETY DATA UTILIZED
Crash data analysis for this SSAR was completed using collision data from the City’s CrossRoads system. CrossRoads is a software for reporting and analyzing traffic collisions. The collision records include a variety of information about each collision including the location, date, time of the day, crash type, crash severity, primary violation category, transportation mode of the involved parties, and movement of the involved parties prior to the collision. Per California state law, motor vehicle collisions must be reported when vehicle or property damage exceeds $1,000, or when any of the parties suffer an injury or fatality. Collisions with no injured parties or little property damage might not be reported and, therefore, are not included in the CrossRoads database.
The SSARP guidelines require analyzing at least three years of the most recent crash data. Five years of CrossRoads (December 2014 to December 2019) data was reviewed for the Wildomar SSARP. The usage of five years of crash data adheres to the maximum threshold permitted by the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) for a safety infrastructure project application for federal funding.
Ranking Function
A candidate intersection or roadway segment for safety improvements does not need to demonstrate a history of high or severe collisions to be considered for further evaluation.
However, locations with high numbers of collisions are often good starting points for safety analysis due to the rich information provided by the collision history. Three ranking methods are utilized to identify high collision frequency intersections and roadway segments: Average Crash Frequency, Crash Rate, and Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) scores. A brief introduction to each of the three methods is provided in the following sections.
Average Crash Frequency
Average Crash Frequency is the most basic method for assessing collision incidence. The analysis tallies the numbers of collisions at each location in the system, both in aggregation and by a category of interest (e.g., level of severity, and collision type). The analysis then ranks intersections or roadway segments based on the collisions’ frequency. The method involves easy computation and little data collection. A crash database such as the CrossRoads usually suffices. 215
Systemic Safety Analysis
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 4 Crash Rate
The Crash Rate method goes a step beyond average crash frequency, normalizing facilities’ crash frequencies by the amount of vehicle traffic or travel. This method divides the number of collisions (or collisions in a particular category) by the quantity of Million Entering Vehicles (for intersections) or 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled (for roadway segments). While the Crash Rate method accounts for differences in facilities’ length and traffic volume, it could unduly favor low-volume and low-collision roadways where countermeasures produce lower net benefit for travelers.
EPDO Scores
Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) scores are calculated by assigning weighting factors to crashes by severity relative to property damage only (PDO) crashes. The weights generally reflect an order of magnitude difference between the societal costs of fatal and severe injury crashes versus non-severe injury crashes. Below are the weights by crash severity, based on the 2020 HSIP manual:
• Fatal/Severe Injury
o Signalized Intersection - $1,590,000
o Non-signalized Intersection - $2,530,000
o Roadway - $2,190,000
• Other Visible Injury - $142,300
• Complaint of Pain - $80,900
• Property Damage Only - $13,300
EPDO scores are useful for a benefit-to-cost analysis as collision costs can be translated into measurable benefits from installing improvements should the improvements prevent the collisions in question. However, they may place undue weight on the injury outcomes of previous collisions rather than overall trends suggested by collision patterns regardless of injury outcome. Furthermore, a location’s EPDO score could be inflated by a fatal or severe collision caused by DUI.
2.2 DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS
According to the CrossRoads database, a total of 653 collisions occurred within the City of Wildomar between December 2014 and December 2019. In the following sections, the crash data are analyzed and discussed for three facility types:
• Signalized intersection: collisions that occurred within 250 feet of a signalized intersection • Non-signalized intersection: collisions that occurred within 150 feet of a non-signalized intersection;
• Mid-block: the remaining are categorized as mid-block collisions.
Collision Severity
Table 2.1 shows the collision severity by facility type breakdown for collisions during the analysis period. Among all the collisions, more than half (335) resulted in Property Damage Only (PDO); 193 collisions resulted in complaint of pain; 41 collisions, or 6.3% of total collisions, were killed or severely injured (KSI) collisions. Non-signalized intersections experienced the most KSI 216
Systemic Safety Analysis
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 5 collisions (18). Mid-block locations had 15 KSI, reflecting almost 10% of the 152 collisions occurring at these locations of all severity levels.
Table 2.1: Collision Severity by Facility Type
Severity
Signalized Intersection Non-signalized
Intersection Mid-block Total
Collisions % Collisions % Collisions % Collisions %
Fatal 1 0.5% 8 2.6% 8 5.3% 17 2.6%
Severe Injury 7 3.6% 10 3.2% 7 4.6% 24 3.7%
Visible Injury 16 8.3% 44 14.2% 24 15.8% 84 12.9%
Complaint of Pain 63 32.8% 94 30.4% 36 23.7% 193 29.6%
Property Damage
Only 105 54.7% 153 49.5% 77 50.7% 335 51.3%
Total 192 309 152 653
Collision Type
Table 2.2 lists the collisions during the analysis period by crash type. Broadside was the most frequent collision type (24.4%) in Wildomar, with the usual primary collision factors associated with this crash type being traffic signals and signs and automobile right of way. Approximately one-third of the collisions at signalized intersections were broadside.
Hit-object was the second most frequent collision type in Wildomar (21.8%), and the most frequent collision type at mid-block locations (26.3%) and non-signalized intersections (23.3%).
Rear-end was the third most frequent collision type in Wildomar, and the second most frequent collision type for signalized intersections. This collision type was typically caused by unsafe speed.
217
Systemic Safety Analysis
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 6
Table 2.2: Collision Type by Facility Type
Type of Collision
Signalized
Intersection
Non-signalized
Intersection Mid-block Total
Collisions % Collisions % Collisions % Collisions %
Broadside 64 33.3% 67 21.7% 28 18.4% 159 24.4%
Head-On 13 6.8% 29 9.4% 13 8.6% 55 8.4%
Hit-Object 30 15.6% 72 23.3% 40 26.3% 142 21.8%
Not Stated 8 4.2% 11 3.6% 2 1.3% 21 3.2%
Other 4 2.1% 6 2.0% 4 2.6% 14 2.1%
Overturned 0 0.0% 8 2.6% 15 9.9% 23 3.5%
Rear-end 44 22.9% 67 21.7% 23 15.1% 134 20.5%
Sideswipe 26 13.5% 35 11.3% 21 13.8% 82 12.6%
Vehicle/
Pedestrian 3 1.6% 14 4.5% 6 3.9% 23 3.5%
Total 192 309 152 653
Lighting Condition
Table 2.3 summarizes the lighting conditions under which collisions occurred during the analysis period by facility type. The majority of collisions (60.5%) occurred under daylight conditions.
About 34% of the collisions occurred under dark conditions, with or without street lights. At Mid-block locations, more than 40% of the collisions occurred under various dark conditions.
Table 2.3: Collision Lighting Condition by Facility Type Lighting
Signalized
Intersection
Non-signalized
Intersection Mid-block Total
Collisions % Collisions % Collisions % Collisions %
Dark - No Street
Lights 1 0.5% 39 12.6% 30 19.7% 70 10.7%
Dark - Street Lights 49 25.5% 69 22.3% 34 22.4% 152 23.3% Dark - Street Lights
Not Functioning 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 1 0.2%
Daylight 129 67.2% 188 60.8% 78 51.3% 395 60.5%
Dusk - Dawn 9 4.7% 10 3.2% 9 5.9% 28 4.3%
Not Stated 4 2.1% 3 1.0% 0 0.0% 7 1.1%
Total 192 309 152 653
Involved Parties
Table 2.4 breaks down the number of collisions during the analysis period by involved parties.
Motor vehicle only collisions accounted for approximately 54.7% of all the collisions in the City:
70% of collisions at signalized intersections, 53% at non-signalized intersections, and 39% at mid-block locations.
218
Systemic Safety Analysis
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 7
Pedestrians and bicyclists were involved in 3.4% and 1.7% of the collisions in Wildomar, respectively. Thirteen out of the 22 pedestrian collisions occurred at non-signalized intersections, and accounted for 4.2% of all the locations at this facility type. Among the eleven bicycle collisions, five occurred at signalized intersections and another five occurred at non- signalized intersections.
Table 2.4: Collision Involved Party by Facility Type
Motor Vehicle
Involved With
Signalized
Intersection
Non-signalized
Intersection Mid-block Total
Collisions % Collisions % Collisions % Collisions %
Animal 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.2%
Bicycle 5 2.6% 5 1.6% 1 0.7% 11 1.7%
Fixed Object 27 14.1% 74 23.9% 45 29.6% 146 22.4%
Motor Vehicle on
Other Roadway 1 0.5% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 2 0.3%
Non - Collision 1 0.5% 7 2.3% 8 5.3% 16 2.5%
Other Motor Vehicle 135 70.3% 163 52.8% 59 38.8% 357 54.7% Other Object 3 1.6% 7 2.3% 3 2.0% 13 2.0%
Parked Motor
Vehicle 2 1.0% 20 6.5% 24 15.8% 46 7.0%
Pedestrian 3 1.6% 13 4.2% 6 3.9% 22 3.4%
Not Mentioned 15 7.8% 18 5.8% 6 3.9% 39 6.0%
Total 192 309 152 653
Primary Collision Factor (PCF)
Table 2.5 lists the number of collisions by the Primary Collision Factor (PCF) during the analysis period. Improper turning was the leading PCF in Wildomar (22.1%) and the most common PCF at mid-block locations (27.6%). Unsafe speed was the second most frequent collision type in the City (21.8%), and the prevailing PCF for signalized intersections (18.8%) and non-signalized intersections (23.3%). Driving under Influence (DUI) accounted for 12.3% of all the collisions and
15.1% of the collisions at mid-block locations.
219
Systemic Safety Analysis
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 8 Table 2.5: Primary Collision Factor by Facility Type
PCF
Signalized
Intersection
Non-signalized
Intersection Mid-block Total
Collisions % Collisions % Collisions % Collisions %
Auto R/W Violation 14 7.3% 28 9.1% 6 3.9% 48 7.4%
Driving Under
Influence 20 10.4% 37 12.0% 23 15.1% 80 12.3%
Following Too Closely 4 2.1% 6 1.9% 2 1.3% 12 1.8%
Hazardous Parking 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 1 0.2%
Impeding Traffic 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.2%
Improper Passing 1 0.5% 2 0.7% 2 1.3% 5 0.8%
Improper Turning 33 17.2% 69 22.3% 42 27.6% 144 22.1%
Not Stated 32 16.7% 46 14.9% 18 11.9% 96 14.7%
Other Hazardous
Movement 2 1.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 3 0.5%
Other Improper
Driving 2 1.0% 3 1.0% 1 0.7% 6 0.9%
Other Than Driver 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 1 0.7% 2 0.3%
Pedestrian R/W
Violation 1 0.5% 0 0.00% 0 0.0% 1 0.2%
Pedestrian Violation 8 4.2% 10 3.2% 4 2.6% 22 3.4%
Traffic Signals and
Signs 25 13.0% 6 1.9% 2 1.3% 33 5.1%
Unknown 9 4.7% 16 5.2% 4 2.6% 29 4.4%
Unsafe Lane Change 0 0.0% 2 0.7% 2 1.3% 4 0.6%
Unsafe Speed 36 18.8% 72 23.3% 34 22.4% 142 21.8%
Unsafe Starting or
Backing 4 2.0% 5 1.6% 3 2.0% 12 1.8%
Wrong Side of Road 1 0.5% 5 1.6% 6 3.9% 12 1.8%
Total 192 309 152 653
Based on the collision analysis, the prominent collision patterns within the City of Wildomar in the past five years include:
• Broadside collisions at signalized and non-signalized intersections • Hit-object collisions at non-signalized intersections and mid-block locations • Rear-end collisions at signalized and non-signalized intersections • Collisions due to unsafe speed at all three facility types • Collisions due to improper turning at mid-block locations and non-signalized intersections • Collisions due to poor lighting conditions, especially at mid-block locations • Collisions due to DUI
220
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 9
3.0 HIGH RISK CORRIDORS AND INTERSECTIONS
This chapter summarizes the proposed safety countermeasures for high collision risk intersections and roadway segments in City of Wildomar, with a focus on addressing the highest occurring crash types by location type.
KOA determines potential candidate locations for field investigation based on the following factors:
• High-risk locations based on collision history
• Typical locations for a prominent collision type in Wildomar • Locations with a predominant collision pattern
• Challenging or unique geometry (skewed intersections, double right-turn lanes, triple left-turn lanes, horizontal/vertical curves, etc.)
• A variety of intersection control types
• Initial screening through previous fieldwork
KOA conducted a field investigation to identify roadway characteristics that might contribute to the collisions at the study locations. In addition, KOA infers other locations that share similar risk factors but may not have demonstrated significant crash patterns yet.
3.1 GENERAL METHODOLOGY
The recommended countermeasures for an identified candidate location are based on the following factors:
• Collision severity
• Lighting condition
• Collision involved parties (motor vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, etc.) • Type of collision
• Primary collision factor
Caltrans developed the SSARP guidelines in consultation with the California Local HSIP Advisory Committee. As such, it is logical to utilize the tools for identifying potential countermeasures for candidate locations that are also used in the development of an HSIP application. The Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM) was developed by Caltrans to support the HSIP call-for-projects and provides lists of potential countermeasures that are deemed acceptable for implementation with federal-aid funding awarded through the HSIP. Countermeasures in the LRSM are categorized by facility type, including signalized intersection, non-signalized intersection, and roadway segments. The majority of, if not all, proposed countermeasures will be selected from the lists in the LRSM.
Identifying and analyzing the patterns in the crash data along with field observations allow for the most appropriate countermeasure to be selected to effectively address safety problems. When applied correctly, countermeasures and their corresponding Crash Reduction Factors (CRFs) can help the City identify the expected safety impacts of installing a combination of countermeasures to reduce crashes and injuries.
The goal for the countermeasure selection process is to identify and implement various combinations of countermeasures to achieve the highest possible benefits. Countermeasures play important roles in the calculation of Benefit/Cost Ratios (BCR). The effectiveness of a countermeasure and how well it can maximize the BCR depend on the CRFs, expected life, and systemic approach opportunity. 221
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 10 Table 3.1 includes a list of safety countermeasures that were applied to this project. They were selected from the LRSM. The table provides information on the countermeasure number in the LRSM, a brief description, applicability to type of crash, the Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) used in the Caltrans local HSIP program associated with the countermeasure, the project life or length of time the measure will be effective, the maximum federal reimbursement ratio, and the degree that the countermeasure can be part of a systemic approach. For crash type applicability, “P&B” means the countermeasure applies to pedestrian and bicycle crashes.
This general process is followed for identifying candidate locations and potential countermeasures with small differences in execution for intersections and roadway segments. The following sections will elaborate further on the processes for analyzing the focus facilities and selecting potential countermeasures. Safety countermeasures are not proposed for all the top-ranked locations. Professional judgment was applied by KOA planners and engineers to determine whether appropriate countermeasures could be proposed to reduce high-risk situations.
222
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 11 Table 3.1: Major Safety Countermeasures Applied to Wildomar SSARP No. Countermeasure Name Crash Type CRF Expected Life
(Years)
Federal Funding
Eligibility
S2 Improve Signal Hardware: Lenses, Back-Plates,
Mounting, Size, and Number All 15% 10 100%
S4 Provide Advanced Dilemma Zone detection All 40% 10 100% S6 Install left-turn lanes All 55% 20 90%
S7 Install protected left turn phase All 30% 20 100%
S17PB Install pedestrian countdown signals P&B 25% 20 100% S21PB Install leading pedestrian interval P&B 60% 10 100% NS1 Add lighting Night 40% 20 100%
NS2 Convert to all-way STOP All 50% 10 100%
NS3 Install signals All 30% 20 100%
NS4 Convert intersection to roundabout All Varies 20 100% NS6 Install signage All 15% 10 100%
NS21PB Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing P&B 35% 20 100% R1 Install segment lighting Night 35% 20 100%
R4 Install guard rail All 25% 20 100%
R8 Install raise median All 25% 20 90%
R34PB Install sidewalk/pathway P&B 80% 20 90%
R35PB Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing P&B 35% 20 90%
3.2 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS METHOD
All intersections of City-owned public streets were reviewed based on the Crash Frequency method and the Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) method. The following summarizes the procedure taken for recommending potential countermeasures at the selected intersections.
• Summarize collision data by intersection and rank by crash frequency and EPDO • Select a list of candidate intersections for field visit and prepare collision diagrams • Review field conditions through physical site visits in the City. Identify roadway characteristics that might contribute to the collisions. Assess the nature of prevalent crash types with respect to the intersection’s control type, geometrical features, and signal phasing/timing. 223
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 12 • Take photos to document various features of the intersections including geometry and striping, access control, crosswalk, signage, pavement markings, and traffic signal controls. • Review via Google Maps whenever necessary to check whether any geometry, striping or signage changes have been made in the past few years.
• Evaluate and screen countermeasures from LRSM or Crash Modification Factor (CMF) Clearinghouse (http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/), a searchable database that can be easily queried to identify CMFs and Crash Reduction Factors (CRFs), which can be derived from the CMFs. • Identify intersections that do not have a demonstrated crash history but resemble other intersections with documented crash history and risk factors.
Ten intersections were chosen for potential countermeasure implementation:
1. Mission Trail and Olive Street (Signalized)
2. Bundy Canyon Road and Orange Street (Signalized)
3. Lemon Street and Mission Trail (Signalized)
4. Corydon Road and Mission Trail (Signalized)
5. Gruwell Street and Palomar Street (Signalized)
6. Bundy Canyon Road and Cherry Street (Two-way Stop)
7. Bryant Street and Palomar Street (Two-way Stop)
8. Bundy Canyon Road and Sunset Avenue (Two-way Stop)
9. Bundy Canyon Road and Harvest Way (Two-way Stop)
10. Grand Avenue and Sheila Ln (All-way Stop)
Intersections are not numbered in any particular order, numbering is only used as a means to reference the intersections throughout the report.
The location of the ten intersections is shown in Figure 3.1.
224
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 13 Figure 3.1: Intersections with Proposed Safety Countermeasures
The intersection rankings by Crash Frequency and EPDO scores are provided in Attachment A.1. Traffic counts collected for the selected intersections are provided in Attachment A.2. The collision diagrams for the selected intersections are provided in Attachment A.3.
1. Mission Trail and Olive Street
As shown in Figure 3.2, the intersection is joined by a minor street, Crescent Avenue, which intersects with Olive Street. Mission Trail is shared between the City of Wildomar and the City of Lake Elsinore down the Centerline.
It has two lanes in each direction, with a speed limit of 50 miles per hour (mph). On the north leg, a left-turn pocket is provided; on the south leg, a two-way left-turn lane is used as a median. Olive Street has one travel lane on each direction with a speed limit of 25 mph. Standard crosswalks exist on the south leg of Mission Trail and on Olive Street. Residential housing exists along Olive Street, while the land west of Mission Trail (located in Lake Elsinore) is largely undeveloped at present.
225
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 14 Figure 3.2: An Aerial View of the intersection of Mission Trail and Olive Street
Source: Google (2020)
A total of 17 collisions occurred at the intersection of Mission Trail and Olive Street between December 2014 and December 2019. The intersection ranks 1st by total collision frequency and 23rd by the EPDO score method.
Collision types consisted of hit-object (7), rear-end (4), broadside (3), and sideswipe (3). The most common primary collision factors were unsafe speed (6) and improper turning (5), although multiple collisions were also reported as caused by DUI and traffic signals and signs violations. Nine collisions occurring at this intersection took place under the dark – with street lights condition.
KOA recommends the following safety countermeasures at this location:
• R4: install additional guardrail to counteract the effects of the horizontal curve located at this intersection which could be leading to hit-object collisions. Specifically, the existing guardrail located southeast of the intersection should be extended north towards the intersection, between the Wildomar Council Center and the signal. KOA also recommends guard rail installation northwest of the intersection just north of the bus stop. These correspond to the locations of hit-object collisions at this intersection.
• S1: install additional safety lighting at this intersection. During fieldwork, KOA identified that lighting was insufficient at this intersection, especially considering the presence of the horizontal curve. This is supported by the collision history that nine out of the 17 collisions in the past five years occurred under the dark – with street lights condition.
226
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 15 • Finally, KOA recommends regularly refreshing crosswalks (see Figure 3.3) and adding an ADA compliant curb ramp at the southwest corner (Lake Elsinore boundary) to ensure safety and accessibility for pedestrians.
Figure 3.3: Faded Crosswalks at Mission Trail and Olive Street
Source: Google (2019)
Similar locations:
• NS1: Almond Street and Bundy Canyon Road
2. Bundy Canyon Road and Orange Street
As shown in Figure 3.4, the east leg of Bundy Canyon Road has two lanes in each direction with a left-turn lane at the intersection, while the west leg narrows down from two lanes in each direction to one lane in each direction. The northbound and southbound movements on Orange Street have a shared through-left lane and a dedicated right-turn lane. There are curb extensions at all four corners and high-visibility school crosswalks.
The west leg of Bundy Canyon Road is within the school zone and has a speed limit of 25 mph, while Orange Street has a speed limit of 40 mph. There is a gas station on the northeast corner of the intersection and a retail plaza on the northwest corner; the two corners on the south consist of vacant land. On-street parking is allowed on the north leg. Current pedestrian push buttons are non-ADA compliant (see Figure 3.5) but will be replaced by a funded project in progress by the City.
227
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 16 Figure 3.4: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Orange Street
Source: Google (2020)
A total of 14 collisions occurred at the intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Orange Street from December 2014 to December 2019. The intersection ranks 4th by total collision frequency and 18th by the EPDO method.
Almost half of all collisions (six out of 14) were broadside collisions.
KOA recommends the following safety countermeasures at this location:
• S6/S7: Restripe to create an exclusive left-turn lane for both the northbound and southbound directions on Orange Street. During field observations, KOA realized that the current lane geometry for northbound and southbound vehicles may be contributing to the high amount of broadside collisions at this intersection.
• For the northbound direction, there is enough space to re-stripe the approach to include both a dedicated right-turn lane and left-turn lane (there is about 34 feet of right-of-way available, which could be re- striped to a 10-foot left-turn lane, a 12-foot through lane, and a 12-foot dedicated right-turn lane). For the southbound approach, due to limited right-of-way, KOA recommends to re-stripe the approach to include a dedicated left-turn lane and through-right lane. As the I-15 freeway is located east of this intersection, KOA does not believe the re-striping will impede the flow of vehicle traffic.
• S2: Improve visibility by installing retro-reflective tape on backplate.
228
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 17 • Replace the faded “No U-Turn Sign” on the mast arm of the signal facing the southbound traffic on Orange Street (see Figure 3.6).
Figure 3.5: Non ADA-Compliant Pedestrian Push Buttons
229
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 18 Figure 3.6: Faded “No U-turn” Sign of Southbound Traffic on Orange Street
Similar Locations:
• S6: add southbound left-turn pocket on Mission Trail at the intersection of Mission Trail and Vine Street
3. Lemon Street and Mission Trail
As shown in Figure 3.7, Mission Trail has two lanes in each direction while Lemon Street has one lane in each direction. A right-turn pocket is provided on the south leg of Mission Trail while a left-turn pocket is provided on the north leg. ADA ramps and a standard crosswalk are provided for pedestrians to cross Lemon Street. The speed limit is 50 mph on Mission Trail and 25 mph on Lemon Street as the intersection is about 1,000 feet from Jean Hayman Elementary School. There is no development on the west side of Mission Trail (located in Lake Elsinore) or on the southeast corner; on the northeast corner, there is a truck rental agency (U-Haul).
230
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 19 Figure 3.7: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Lemon Street and Mission Trail
Source: Google (2021)
A total of 11 collisions occurred at the intersection of Mission Trail and Lemon Street from December 2014 to December 2019. The intersection ranks 8th by total collision frequency and 26th by the EPDO score. Four collisions were hit-object, three were rear-end, three were sideswipe, and one was a broadside collision. Some noteworthy primary collision factors include four collisions caused by DUI, two caused by traffic signals and signs violations, and two caused by unsafe speed. Five of the collisions occurred slightly east of the intersection or when turning to go east.
KOA recommends the following safety countermeasures at this location:
• KOA identified that there is a U-Haul lot located on the northeast corner of the intersection. The driveway for ingress and egress to this lot is located close to the intersection. Collisions may be caused by cars stopping suddenly to turn into the driveway or from large vehicles turning out of the driveway. KOA recommends that the City coordinate with U-Haul to move the driveway farther away from the intersection, near the east side of the lot.
• There is a STOP pavement marking that has not been completed removed on the east leg despite the presence of a signal at this intersection. KOA recommends removing this pavement marking. • Repaint the faded existing crosswalk on Lemon Street (see Figure 3.8). 231
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 20 Figure 3.8: Non-Compliant STOP Pavement Marking Located at Mission Trail and Lemon Street
4. Corydon Road and Mission Trail
As shown in Figure 3.9, Mission Trail has two lanes in each direction. There is a left-turn pocket on the south leg and a right-turn pocket on the north leg. Corydon Road is shared between the City of Wildomar and the City of Lake Elsinore down the centerline. On the west leg, Corydon Road has two left-turn lanes and two right- turn lanes for eastbound traffic. It has two entry lanes that quickly narrow into one lane for westbound traffic.
ADA ramps are provided on the northwest and southwest corners of the intersection; standard crosswalks are provided on the west and south legs. The speed limit is 50 mph on Mission Trail and 45 mph on Corydon Road.
There is no development on the northwest (Lake Elsinore boundary) or southwest corner; on the east side of Mission Trail, there are some low-density industrial and commercial facilities.
232
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 21 Figure 3.9: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Corydon Road and Mission Trail
Source: Google (2021)
A total of ten collisions occurred at the intersection of Mission Trail and Corydon Road from December 2014 to December 2019. The intersection ranks 12
th by total collision frequency and 25th by the EPDO score. Collision types include broadside (3), head-on (3), rear-end (2), and sideswipe (1). The common primary collision factors are automobile right of way (2), traffic signals and signs violations (2), and unsafe speed (2). All three broadside collisions were eastbound left-turning cars colliding with southbound through traffic.
KOA recommends the following safety countermeasures at this location:
• S4: There is existing video detection at this location. It would be beneficial to install advanced dilemma zone detection on all three legs, which would help reduce left-turn collisions due to red light violations.
233
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 22 • S2: All vehicle heads, which are currently worn down, should be replaced and include LED left turn arrow vehicle heads, which would increase vehicle head visibility.
• S21PB: Currently, there are two eastbound dedicated right-turn lanes which are required to yield to pedestrians in the crosswalk on the south leg. KOA recommends adding a leading pedestrian interval to improve safety in this arrangement.
• Eliminate the dual receiving lanes on the west leg of the intersection, as they quickly merge into one lane and require drivers to act quickly after turning.
The City has taken exploratory efforts with the City of Lake Elsinore to realign the intersection to more of a traditional “T” shaped intersection. During this effort, one or more of the above recommendations could be implemented.
Similar Location:
• S21PB: Clinton Keith Road and Hidden Spring Road (leading pedestrian interval for the northbound right- turn approach on Hidden Springs Road)
5. Gruwell Street and Palomar Street
As shown in Figure 3.10, both Gruwell Street and Palomar Street have one lane in each direction. Left-turn pockets are provided on both legs of Palomar Street. The left-turn phasing is permissive in all directions.
Standard crosswalks are provided on three sides although ADA ramps are absent. The speed limit on Gruwell Street is 35 mph. There is no development around the intersection, except for the Wildomar Cemetery District on the east corner.
234
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 23 Figure 3.10: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Gruwell Street and Palomar Street
Source: Google (2020)
A total of ten collisions occurred at the intersection of Gruwell Street and Palomar Street from December 2014 to December 2019. The intersection ranks 12th by total collision frequency and 30th by the EPDO score. The most common collision type is broadside (6), followed by head-on (1), hit object (1), rear-end (1), and sideswipe (1). The leading primary collision factors are improper turning (3) and traffic signals and signs violations (3). The broadside collisions were primarily left-turning vehicles heading eastbound or westbound colliding with vehicles heading through the intersection northbound or southbound.
While collisions during left turns may be caused by red-light running, this intersection does not meet the warrant for dedicated left-turn protected-permissive phasing due to its low left-turn volumes. 1 KOA recommends the following safety countermeasures at this location:
• S2: upgrade existing vehicle heads to LED vehicle heads and provide LED luminaires. • S4: Install advanced dilemma zone detection
• Upgrade curb ramps to be ADA compliant to ensure accessibility for pedestrians.
1 See MUTCD Section 4D.19, “for a traffic-actuated signal, 50 or more left turning vehicles per hour in one direction with the product of the turning and conflicting through traffic during the peak hour of 100,000 or more” 235
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 24
6. Bundy Canyon Road and Cherry Street
As shown in Figure 3.11, Bundy Canyon Road has two lanes in each direction while Cherry Street has one lane for each direction. The intersection is stop-controlled on Cherry Street. A left-turn pocket is provided on the west leg of Bundy Canyon Road. The speed limit on Bundy Canyon Road is 45 mph. There is no development immediately north of Bundy Canyon Road; on the south side, there is a gas station and a convenience shop.
Figure 3.11: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Cherry Street
Source: Google (2020)
A total of seven collisions occurred at the intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Cherry Street from December 2014 to December 2019. The intersection ranks 17th by total collision frequency and 45th by the EPDO score. The most common collision type is broadside (3), followed by head-on (2), and rear-end (2). The leading primary collision factors are improper turning (2) and automobile right of way (2). There are three collisions involving eastbound left-turning cars, and one collision involving a southbound right-turning car.
During field review, KOA noticed that existing striping is creating a confusing situation in the westbound direction at this intersection. The westbound direction splits into two lanes immediately prior to the intersection. Faded striping, the short distance between the change in the number of lanes and the intersection, and potential sight distance issues looking left from a car stopped at the north leg (see Figure
3.12) may all be contributing to a difficulty in recognizing the need to check for two approach lanes or a difficulty in seeing these approach lanes.
236
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 25 Figure 3.12: Sight Distance Blocked by Mud Mound for Vehicles Turning out of Cherry Street
The eastbound striping of lanes may also be creating confusion, though there is no evidence of this from collision history. A right-turn lane is added to two approach lanes immediately at this intersection. The second of the two through lanes begins to merge into one single through lane, with the first associated pavement marking located right at this intersection.
KOA recommends the following safety countermeasures at this location:
• Restripe Bundy Canyon Road to provide for only one westbound travel lane east of Cherry Ave. • Restripe the second eastbound through lane to become a “trap” right-turn lane, meaning having it change directly into a right-turn lane instead of the existing situation, where a dedicated right-turn lane is added and the two through lanes merge together afterwards.
Note that a development project is funding a change to the alignment of this intersection due to a traffic impact study. This may resolve one or more of the issues that KOA encountered at this intersection.
7. Bryant Street and Palomar Street
As shown in Figure 3.13, Bryant Street and Palomar Street have one lane in each direction. The intersection is stop-controlled on Bryant Street. The speed limit is 25 mph on both streets. Being in a residential neighborhood, low-density single-family homes can be found on all four corners of the intersection.
237
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 26 Figure 3.13: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Bryant Street and Palomar Street
Source: Google (2020)
A total of five collisions occurred at the intersection of Bryant Street and Palomar Street from December 2014 to December 2019. The intersection ranks 24th by total collision frequency and 37th by the EPDO method. The most common collision type is broadside (3), followed by hit-object (1), and rear-end (1). One broadside collision involved a bicyclist traveling north making a left turn from Bryant Street and colliding with a vehicle traveling west on Palomar Street, causing property damage. The main primary collision factors are automobile right of way (2) and unsafe speed (1).
KOA believes the lack of a STOP sign on the north leg (see Figure 14) and sight distance insufficiencies for vehicles looking right and making a southbound left turn from this location likely contributed to two of the observed collisions.
238
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 27 Figure 3.14: Missing Stop Sign and Pavement Markings on the Bryant Street North of Palomar Street
KOA recommends the following safety countermeasures at this location:
• NS2: Conduct a warrant to make this intersection an all-way stop; while it is unlikely that the intersection will meet the volume threshold required for the warrant, an all-way stop can be justified under the additional consideration of a failure to meet sufficient corner sight distance required for a two-way stop.2 It is likely that this intersection will meet the warrant. If not, at minimum the missing stop sign should be added.
• NS1: Add safety lighting at the intersection, as virtually none is present at this intersection currently.
Similar Locations:
Add missing stop signs:
• Bundy Canyon Road and Harvest Way E – missing stop sign north of the intersection • Bundy Canyon Road and Club Avenue – missing stop sign north of the intersection • Bundy Canyon Road and Raciti Road – missing stop sign north of the intersection
NS2: Convert to all-way STOP controlled intersection (from two-way controlled intersection)
• Mission Trail and Palomar Street
2 See MUTCD Section 2B.07, “Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop” 239
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 28
8. Bundy Canyon Road and Sunset Avenue
As shown in Figure 3.15, Bundy Canyon Road and Sunset Avenue have one lane on each direction. The intersection is stop-controlled on Sunset Avenue. The south leg is unpaved while the north leg is unmarked.
The speed limit is 45 mph on Bundy Canyon Road and 25 mph on Sunset Avenue. There is no development immediately around the intersection; Sunset Avenue is the entrance to some small residential communities.
Figure 3.15: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Sunset Avenue
Source: Google (2020)
A total of five collisions occurred at the intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Sunset Avenue from December 2014 to December 2019. The intersection ranks 24
th by total collision frequency and 37th by the EPDO method.
All collisions are rear-end collisions that happened to vehicles traveling east on Bundy Canyon Road, resulting one visible injury, two complaint of pain, and two property damage only cases. Four collisions were caused by unsafe speed, and one by following too closely.
Adding a left-turn pocket on Bundy Canyon Road would reduce the chance of rear-end collisions in the future.
However, there is not sufficient right-of-way to add a dedicated left-turn lane.
KOA recommends the following safety countermeasures at this location:
240
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 29 • NS6: Add additional Side Road Symbol Sign (MUTCD W2-2) and Advance Street Name Sign (MUTCD D3- 2) to help motorists better anticipate that an intersection is upcoming where a vehicle may slow down and turn.
W2-2 Sign D3-2 Sign
Similar Locations:
• Bundy Canyon Road and Harvest Way E and Club Avenue
• Bundy Canyon Road and Raciti Road
• Albert Street and Corydon Road and Lakeside Drive
9. Bundy Canyon Road and Harvest Way
As shown in Figure 3.16, Bundy Canyon Road and Harvest Way have one lane on each direction. The intersection is stop-controlled on Harvest Way. The north leg of Bundy Canyon Road has a left-turn pocket and the south leg of Bundy Canyon Road has a right-turn lane. The speed limit is 45 mph on Bundy Canyon Road and 25 mph on Harvest Way. There is no development immediately around the intersection; Harvest Way is the entrance to some small residential communities.
241
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 30 Figure 3.16: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Harvest Way
Source: Google (2021)
A total of 11 collisions occurred at the intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Harvest Way from December 2014 to December 2019. The intersection ranks 8
th by total collision frequency and 6th by the EPDO score. Six out of the 11 collisions were broadsides that were not caused by DUI. One out of the six collisions resulted in a fatality and the remaining five collisions resulted in Complain of Pain injuries.
KOA recommends the following safety countermeasures at this location:
• NS3: Signalize this intersection; the current traffic volumes will not meet the signal warrant. However, signalizing the intersection can bring significant benefits in reducing collisions in the future. • NS6: Add W3-3 signal ahead sign on Bundy Canyon Road on both sides of the intersection
Similar Locations:
• NS3: Signalize the intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Monte Vista Drive • NS3: Signalize the intersection of Bundy Canyon Road and Orchard Street • Add W3-3 signal ahead sign northeast of the intersection of Bundy Canyon Road & Farm Road • NS6: For the intersection of Grape Street and Olive Street, add W3-1 stop sign ahead sign on Grape Street north of the intersection, and on Olive Street east of the intersection 242
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 31
10. Grand Avenue and Sheila Lane
As shown in Figure 3.17, the intersection of Grand Avenue and Sheila Lane is controlled by an all-way stop sign.
Grand Avenue has one travel lane and one bike lane in each direction. There are a left-turn pocket and a right- turn lane on Grand Avenue at this intersection on both sides of Sheila Lane. There is also a multi-purpose trail on the south side of the roadway. Sheila Lane has one travel lane in each direction and the south leg leads into a single-family residential community. The speed limit is 45 mph on Grand Avenue and 25 mph on Sheila Lane.
Figure 3.17: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Grand Avenue and Sheila Lane
Source: Google (2021)
A total of four collisions occurred at the intersection from December 2014 to December 2019. All four collisions were rear-end collisions. Two out of the four collisions resulted in injuries. The intersection ranks 32nd by total collision frequency and 42nd by the EPDO score.
KOA recommends the following safety countermeasures at this location:
• NS4: Convert intersection to a roundabout
Similar Locations:
NS4:
• Wildomar Trail and I-15 South on and off ramps
• Wildomar Trail and I-15 North on and off ramps
• Bundy Canyon Road and Almond Street
243
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 32
3.3 ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS
According to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and Wildomar Mobility Plan – Existing Condition Review, all roadways within the City were classified into four categories of high traffic roadways:
arterials, major roads, secondary roads, and collectors. KOA defined a total of 18 roadway segments that include all four categories in the City. Local streets are excluded due to their low traffic volumes and collision frequency. The definition of the roadway segments was primarily based on major barriers such as freeways and rail tracks, major cross streets, roadway configuration, and land use. The roadway segment map is provided in Figure 3.18.
Figure 3.18: City of Wildomar Roadway Segment Map
Each corridor segment was analyzed based on the total number of collisions, the number of non-intersection collisions, and collision severity. The following three ranking methods were used to rank the roadway segments:
244
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 33 • Collision frequency
• Collision rate
• Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO)
The completed roadway ranking tables are provided in Attachment A.4. The 24-hour traffic counts conducted by the City in 2019 were utilized for calculating crash rates. The counts are provided in Attachment A.5. The collision diagrams for the selected roadway segments are provided in Attachment A.6.
Ranking is a quantitative method used to evaluate a particular corridor segment and compare with various other segments. It is ultimately just a tool to streamline the crash analysis and selection process for candidate locations. High ranking segments shown at the top of the list are not necessarily ideal candidates for potential improvements and selecting locations to further review requires discernment.
After ranking the roadway segments, the next step is to view the various collision data that is included for each roadway segment. This process requires that all high collision segments in the City are reviewed to determine patterns or trends in crashes, with the objective of searching for segments with unusual crash rates and characteristics. Several steps are taken when a roadway segment is selected for review, as shown below:
• Select a list of roadway segments for field visit and prepare collision diagrams. • Review field conditions through physical site visits in the City. Identify roadway characteristics that might contribute to the collisions. Assess the nature of prevalent crash types with respect to the roadway segment's vertical/horizontal alignment, median type, lane width, shoulder, signing and striping, speed limit, and others.
• Take photos to document various features of the roadway segments including geometry and striping, medians, curbs, sidewalks, driveways, signage, pavement markings, and others. • Review via Google Maps whenever necessary to check whether any geometry, striping or signage changes have been made in the past few years.
• Evaluate and screen countermeasures from LRSM or Crash Modification Factor (CMF) Clearinghouse (http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/), a searchable database that can be easily queried to identify CMFs and Crash Reduction Factors (CRFs), which can be derived from the CMFs. • Identify candidate roadway segments that do not have a demonstrated crash history but resemble other segments with documented crash history and risk factors. Once identified, the roadway segment is subjected to analysis through the aforementioned steps.
Four roadway segments were selected for analysis and recommendations are provided for roadway improvements. Again, numbering is only used as a reference, not an order of priority:
1. Corydon Road from Mission Trail to Grand Avenue
2. Mission Trail from Malaga Road to Corydon Road
3. Orange Street - Gruwell Street from Bundy Canyon Road to Grand Avenue
4. Palomar Street from Wildomar Trail (Central Street) to Southern City Limit
The locations of the four roadway segments are shown in Figure 3.19.
245
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 34 Figure 3.19: Roadway Segments with Proposed Safety Countermeasures
1. Corydon Road from Mission Trail to Grand Avenue
This segment on Corydon Road from Mission Trail to Grand Avenue is approximately one and a half miles long.
It is shared between the City of Wildomar and City of Lake Elsinore down the centerline. The roadway width ranges from 25 to 60 feet with a posted speed limit of 45 mph. Between Grand Avenue and Union Street, Corydon Road has one lane in each direction with a two-way left-turn lane in the center. Between Union Street and Palomar Street, there are two lanes for southwest-bound traffic and one-lane for northeast-bound traffic, separated by a two-way left-turn lane. Between Palomar Street and Mission Trail, there is one lane in each direction; a two-way left-turn lane exists in a developed commercial area and is replaced by a double yellow line in the undeveloped rural area. The daily traffic volume was approximately 14,530 in 2019. This segment includes a total of four signalized intersections.
A total of 45 collisions occurred on this segment from December 2014 to December 2019, ranking 5th by collision frequency, 4th by crash rate, and 8th by EPDO score. The majority of the collisions occurred during the daytime. Rear-end, broadside, and hit-object were the most common collision types. 16 (36%) collisions were due to unsafe speed and 11 (24%) were caused by improper turning. 246
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 35
During the field visit to this segment, KOA noticed general issues such as speeding, lack of street lighting, insufficient pedestrian infrastructure, and sight distance issues.
The intersection of Corydon Road & Bryant Street is shown in Figure 3.20. There were three rear-end collisions at this intersection. KOA recommends the following improvements at this location:
• Pave 100 feet of Bryant Street immediately adjacent to Corydon Road • R28: Add edge line striping on Corydon Road near the intersection • NS1: Add intersection lighting
Figure 3.20: A Street View of Bryant Street and Corydon Road
Source: Google (2019)
The intersection of Corydon Road & Palomar Street is shown in Figure 3.21. There were two pedestrian collisions at this intersection. KOA recommends the following improvements at this location:
• Add high visibility crosswalks
• Add ADA compliant curb ramp at the southeast corner
• S17PB: Install pedestrian countdown signal heads
247
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 36 Figure 3.21: An Aerial View of Palomar Street and Corydon Road
Source: Google (2021)
Figure 3.22 shows the stretch of Corydon Road north of Union Street. There were three collisions of vehicles traveling in the southbound direction towards the intersection of Cordon Road and Union Street. KOA recommends the following improvement at this location:
• Increase the length of the dashed line indicating that the right lane will become a “trap” dedicated right- turn only lane to 775 feet, and move “right lane must turn right” sign back to the start of this dashed line3 (these improvements are located on the Lake Elsinore boundary).
3 See MUTCD Figure 3B-14 and Table 2C-4. The length of the elephant tracks should correspond to distance “d” in Figure 3B-14, and this distance is the same as the advance placement of a warning sign in Table 2C-4. In this situation, guidance should follow Condition A: Speed Reduction and Lane Changing in Heavy Traffic, which suggests a distance of 775 feet at 45 miles per hour 248
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 37 Figure 3.22: An Aerial View of Corydon Road North of Union Street
Source: Google (2021)
The intersection of Corydon Road and Grand Avenue is shown in Figure 3.23. As shown in Figure 3.24, the southbound signal for vehicles on Corydon Road turning to Grand Avenue currently features a right-turn overlap.
KOA recommends the following improvements at this intersection (located on the Lake Elsinore boundary):
• Remove right-turn overlap (this is not permissible as there is no dedicated right-turn pocket 4)
• S2: Add near side signal at north leg of Grand Avenue • S4: Install advanced dilemma zone detection
• S7: Install protected left-turn phasing NB/SB (left-turn lane already exists) • Add ADA compliant curb ramps at the northeast and southwest corners of the intersection.
4 See MUTCD Section 4D.21, “A protected only mode right-turn movement that does not begin and terminate at the same time as the adjacent through movement shall not be provided on an approach unless an exclusive right-turn lane exists.” 249
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 38 Figure 3.23: An Aerial View of Corydon Road and Grand Avenue
Source: Google (2020)
250
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 39 Figure 3.24: Street View of Southbound Corydon Road towards Grand Avenue
KOA also recommends narrowing the southwest bound dual receiving lane starting at the west leg of Mission Trail & Corydon Road, specifically by reducing the number of receiving lanes from two to one (see 4. Corydon Road and Mission Trail under the intersection section). As the City is working on alignment changes with the City of Lake Elsinore, work on this re-alignment may help to improve this situation.
2. Mission Trail from Malaga Road to Corydon Road
This segment on Mission Trail from Malaga Road to Corydon Road is approximately 1.4 miles long. The roadway width ranges from 48 to 72 feet with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The centerline of the roadway forms the boundary between Lake Elsinore and Wildomar. Between Malaga Road and Elberta Road/Hidden Trail, Mission Trail has two lanes for northbound traffic and three lanes for southbound traffic, separated by a two-way left-turn lane. Between Elberta Road/Hidden Trail and Olive Street, Mission Trail narrows down to two lanes in each direction with a two-way left-turn lane in the center. South of Olive Street, the roadway segment continues to narrow and the median becomes a double-yellow line. The daily traffic volume was approximately 20,587 in 2019. This segment includes a total of five signalized intersections. 251
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 40
A total of 79 collisions occurred on this segment from December 2014 to December 2019, ranking 1st by collision frequency, 2nd by crash rate, and 2nd by EPDO score. Thirty-six (46%) of the total collisions happened during nighttime. Rear-end, broadside, and hit-object were the most common collision types. Seventeen (22%) collisions were caused due to unsafe speed, 16 (20%) were by DUI, and 15 (19%) were caused by improper turning.
During the field visit, KOA observed issues consistent across the corridor, including high speeds, lack of street lighting, and poor sight distance in some locations. There were two fatalities with pedestrians at Mission Trail and Sylvester Road, which both occurred at night. As shown in Figure 3.25, there is a lack of adequate street lighting on Mission Trail.
Figure 3.25: Street View of Mission Trail near Vine Street
KOA recommends the following improvements along this roadway segment:
• R1: Add segment lighting along the entire roadway segment • R8: Install raised median from Malaga Road to Lemon Street • Add ADA compliant curb ramps at Mission Trail & Elberta Road
Similar Locations:
R1:
• Add intersection and segment lighting on Wildomar Trail between Baxter Road and Killarney Ln • Add intersection and segment lighting on Bundy Canyon Road between Mission Trail and Sunset Avenue • Add intersection and segment lighting on Mission Trail from Corydon Road to Bundy Canyon Road • Enhance intersection and segment lighting on Clinton Keith Road between Stable Lanes Road and Elizabeth Lane
252
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 41
3. Orange Street - Gruwell Street from Bundy Canyon Road to Grand Avenue This is segment of Orange Street is approximately two miles long. The Orange Street segment starts from Bundy Canyon Road, and merges into Gruwell Street and ends at Grand Avenue. The roadway width ranges from 24 to 48 feet with a posted speed limit of 50 mph. The daily traffic volume was approximately 2,769 in 2019. This segment includes a total of two signalized intersections.
A total of 34 collisions occurred on this segment from December 2014 to December 2019, ranking 6 th by
collision frequency, 1st by crash rate, and 9th by EPDO score. Eleven (32%) of the total collisions happened during nighttime. Broadside and head-on were the most common collision types. Five (15%) collisions were caused by improper turning, five by traffic signals and signs violation, and four (12%) by unsafe speed.
During fieldwork, KOA identified issues of speeding, lack of street lighting, and lack of pedestrian infrastructure on the corridor, which could contribute to the collisions with pedestrians and collisions occurring at night that have happened along the corridor.
KOA recommends the following improvements along the roadway segment:
• R1: Add street lighting along the entire segment
• R34PB: Add sidewalks from Bundy Canyon Road to Grove Street on the west side of the roadway • R35PB: Add crosswalks at Grove Street on the West leg and Walnut Street on the West leg
4. Palomar Street from Wildomar Trail (Central Street) to Southern City Limit The segment of Palomar Street from Wildomar Trail (Central Street) to the southern city limit is approximately
2.5 miles long. The daily traffic volume was approximately 9,802 in 2019. This segment includes a total of two signalized intersections.
A total of 29 collisions occurred on this segment from December 2014 to December 2019, ranking 7th by collision frequency, 13th by crash rate, and 5th by EPDO score. Ten (34%) of the total collisions happened during nighttime. Hit-object, rear-end, and overturned were the most common collision types. Seven (24%) collisions were caused by unsafe speed and five (17%) were due to DUI.
KOA recommends the following improvement on Palomar Street from Wildomar Trail (Central Street) to Frederick Street:
• Add striping and signage to better indicate that only one lane is present in each direction.
Similar Location:
• Bundy Canyon Road between Orange Street and I-15 northbound ramp
The intersection of Palomar Street & Frederick Street is shown in Figure 3.26. KOA recommends the following improvements at this intersection:
• Add delineators to tighten intersection at the southeast corner • NS21PB: Add continental crosswalk
253
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 42 Figure 3.26: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Palomar Street and Frederick Street
Source: Google (2020)
The intersection of Palomar Street & Catt Road is shown in Figure 3.27. KOA noticed during the filed visit that the two left-turn pockets don’t align well. The aerial view of the intersection confirms that.
254
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 43 Figure 3.27: An Aerial View of the Intersection of Palomar Street and Catt Road
Source: Google (2020)
KOA recommends:
• Re-align left-turn pockets in the eastbound and westbound direction
Similar locations:
• Clinton Keith Road at Elizabeth Lane
• Clinton Keith Road at Inland Valley Drive
As shown in Figure 3.28, a push-button for bike crossing is installed on the signal pole at the northwest corner of Palomar Street and Clinton Keith Road. However, there is a right-turn lane in between the bike lane and the signal pole, which makes it infeasible for bicyclists to push the button.
KOA recommends the following improvements at this intersection:
• Remove the push-button for bike crossing (the City already plans to do it) • Add video or loop bike detection
• S1: Remove Type 1A signals and replace with Type 15 to provide more lighting
255
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 44 Figure 3.28: Push Button for Bike Crossing at the Intersection of Palomar Street and Clinton Keith Road
It is also noted that five collisions from overturning vehicles occurred on Palomar Street at the S-shaped curve near the eastern city limit (see Figure 3.29). However, this segment is currently being re-aligned with funding from a development project, which may include improvements to avoid collisions of this type in the future.
KOA would recommend additional signage and guardrail if the current alignment was maintained.
256
High Risk Corridors and Intersections
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 45 Figure 3.29: An Aerial View of Palomar Street at the Eastern City Limit
Source: Google(2020)
257
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 46
4.0 SAFETY PROJECTS
Safety projects are proposed at 10 intersections and 4 roadway segments, based on the safety countermeasures proposed in the previous section, plus at 13 additional intersections and 7 additional roadway segments with similar characteristics as the intersections and segments discussed. This section provides the project scope, collision reduction benefits calculation, cost estimation and Benefit to Cost (B/C) ratio analysis. This section also discusses and summarizes the project prioritization for HSIP application.
4.1 PROJECT SCOPES AND BENEFIT CALCULATIONS
The development of project scopes involves identifying one or more specific countermeasures at potential locations for safety improvements. For each location, a general scope of the project(s) is described. The exhibits of the project concepts for selected projects are provided in Attachment A.7.
Expected benefits are derived by applying the proposed countermeasures and corresponding Crash Reduction Factors (CRFs) to the expected crashes. This involves:
• Identifying the current number of crashes without treatment • Applying CRFs by type and severity
• Applying a benefit value by crash severity
• Calculating the annual collision reduction benefits and multiplying by the project life in years
Caltrans has established some key requirements and procedures for its calls-for-projects to allow agencies maximum flexibility in combining countermeasures and locations into a single project while ensuring all projects can be consistently ranked on a statewide basis. These include:
• Only a maximum of three (3) individual countermeasures can be utilized in the B/C ratio for a project.
• For a countermeasure to be utilized in the B/C ratio calculations, it must represent a minimum of 15%of the project’s total construction cost. This is intended to ensure that minor and insignificant elements of the project are not misrepresented to be a major safety effort by the agency.
An engineer determining the benefits of newly installed infrastructure first determines the number of collisions with potential to be prevented by the improvement. The engineer then applies the CRF which gives the rough percentage of crashes that would actually be prevented.
The next step in estimating the overall benefit of a proposed improvement project is to multiply the expected reduction in crashes by a generally accepted value for the “cost” of crashes. The expected “benefit” value for a project is the expected “reduction in costs” value from reducing future crashes. The source for the costs by collision severity level was taken from Attachment D of the Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual:
258
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 47 • Fatal - $5,579,400
• Severe Injury - $297,100
• Other Visible Injury - $108,600
• Complaint of Pain - $61,300
• Property Damage Only - $10,000
The final step in calculating the total safety project benefits is to divide the benefits by the number of years the collision data was collected (five years for this project), and then multiply this value by the project life in years.
For this SSAR, instead of calculating project benefits manually, project benefits were derived from entering collision data directly into the HSIP Analyzer tool. The tool auto-calculates project collision reduction benefits based on the method discussed above, and reduces benefits calculated if more than one project is included due to cumulative effects.
In Table 4.1 the project scopes are listed, including the applicable countermeasure category for each improvement and benefits calculated according to the method above. Project numbering references the intersection and roadway segment analysis in Chapter 3 above; they do not designate an order of priority. Projects beginning with an “A” are projects proposed at intersections that were not chosen for analysis in Chapter 3 but are similar or related intersections to at least one of the locations studied where similar treatments can be recommended. Note that projects A1 and A6 were deemed unsuitable and dropped during the process of developing the SSAR. The lack of inclusion is intentional.
Table 4.1: Safety Project Scopes
Project 1: Mission Trail & Olive Street
An exhibit of the proposed safety projects is provided in Attachment A.7.
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
R4 Install guard rail
The existing guardrail located southeast
of the intersection should be extended
north towards the intersection, between
the Wildomar Council Center and the
signal. Guard rail should also be installed
northwest of the intersection just north
of the bus stop.
All 25% 20 $1,215,300
CUSTOM Pedestrian
improvements
Repaint crosswalks and add an ADA
compliant curb ramp at the southwest
corner to ensure safety and accessibility
for pedestrians.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
259
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 48 Project 2: Bundy Canyon Road & Orange Street
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
S2 Improve signal
hardware
Furnish and install retro-reflective
tape on vehicle head backplate. All 15% 10 $533,925
S4
Provide
Advanced
Dilemma Zone
Detection
Install advanced dilemma zone
detection All 40% 10 $1,423,799
S7 Install left-turn
lane
Restripe to create an exclusive left-
turn lane for both the northbound
and southbound directions on
Orange Street.
All 30% 20 $2,479,470
CUSTOM Replace sign
Replace the faded “No U-Turn Sign”
on the mast arm of the signal facing
the southbound traffic on Orange
Street
N/A N/A N/A N/A
An exhibit of the proposed safety project is provided in Attachment A.7.
Project 3: Lemon Street & Mission Trail
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
CUSTOM Move driveway
Coordinate with U-Haul to move the
driveway farther away from the
intersection, near the east side of the
lot.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CUSTOM Remove pavement
marking
There is a STOP pavement marking
that has not been completely
removed on the east leg despite the
presence of a signal at this
intersection. Remove this pavement
marking.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CUSTOM Repaint crosswalk Repaint the faded existing crosswalk on Lemon Street N/A N/A N/A N/A
An exhibit of the proposed safety project is provided in Attachment A.7.
260
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 49 Project 4: Corydon Street & Mission Trail
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
S2 Improve signal
hardware
All vehicle heads, which are currently
worn down, should be replaced by LED
left turn arrow vehicle heads, which
would increase vehicle head visibility.
All 15% 10 $212,910
S4
Provide Advanced
Dilemma Zone
Detection
There is existing video detection at this
location. Install advanced dilemma
zone detection on all three legs
All 40% 10 $567,759
S21PB Add leading
pedestrian interval
Add leading pedestrian interval to
improve safety with presence of two
eastbound dedicated turn lanes.
P&B 60% 10 $0
CUSTOM Remove lane Eliminate the dual receiving lanes on the west leg of the intersection. N/A N/A N/A N/A
A typical exhibit of advanced dilemma zone detection installation is provided in Attachment A.7.
Project 5: Gruwell Street & Palomar Street
No. Countermeasur
e Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
S2 Improve signal
hardware
Upgrade existing vehicle heads to LED
vehicle heads and provide LED
luminaries
All 15% 10 $107,818
S4
Provide
Advanced
Dilemma Zone
Detection
Install advanced dilemma zone
detection All 40% 10 $287,515
CUSTOM Pedestrian
improvements
Upgrade all curb ramps to ADA
compliant N/A N/A N/A N/A
A typical exhibit of advanced dilemma zone detection installation is provided in Attachment A.7.
Project 6: Bundy Canyon Road & Cherry Street
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
CUSTOM Remove lane
Restripe Bundy Canyon Road to provide
for only one westbound travel lane east of
Cherry Ave.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CUSTOM Restripe lane
Restripe the second eastbound through
lane to become a “trap” right-turn lane,
meaning having it change directly into a
right-turn lane instead of the existing
situation, where a dedicated right-turn
lane is added and the two through lanes
merge together afterwards.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
261
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 50 Project 7: Bryant Street & Palomar Street
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
NS1 Add lighting Add safety lighting at the intersection Night 40% 20 $15,960 NS2 Convert to all-way
STOP
Conduct a warrant to make this
intersection an all-way stop All 50% 10 $330,700
Project 8: Bundy Canyon Road & Sunset Avenue
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
NS6 Add signage
Add additional Side Road Symbol
Sign (MUTCD W2-2) and Advance
Street Name Sign (MUTCD D3-2) to
help motorists better anticipate that
an intersection is upcoming where a
vehicle may slow down and turn.
All 15% 10 $99,211
Project 9: Bundy Canyon Road & Harvest Way
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
NS3 Install signals Signalize this intersection All 30% 20 $3,763,441 CUSTOM Add signage
Add W3-3 signal ahead sign on
Bundy Canyon Road on both sides of
the intersection
N/A N/A N/A N/A
An exhibit of the proposed safety project is provided in Attachment A.7.
Project 10: Grand Avenue & Sheila Lane
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
NS4 Convert to
roundabout Convert intersection to a roundabout All Varies 20 $835,940 An exhibit of the proposed safety project is provided in Attachment A.7.
262
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 51 Project 11: Corydon Road from Mission Trail to Grand Avenue No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
S2 Improve signal
hardware
Furnish and install retro-reflective
tape on vehicle head backplate on
Corydon Road & Grand Avenue.
All 15% 10 $27,415
S4
Provide Advanced
Dilemma Zone
Detection
Install advanced dilemma zone
detection on Corydon Road & Grand
Avenue.
All 40% 10 $73,106
S7 Install left-turn lane
Implement left-turn protected
phasing for both the northbound and
southbound directions on Grand
Avenue.
All 30% 20 $127,309
S17PB Install pedestrian
countdown signals
Install pedestrian countdown signal
heads at Palomar Street & Corydon
Road
P&B 25% 20 $1,732,300
NS1 Add lighting Add intersection lighting to Corydon
Road & Bryant Street Night 40% 20 $227,680
R28 Install edge-lines
and centerlines
Add edge line striping on Corydon
Road near the intersection of
Corydon Road & Bryant Street
All 25% 10 $189,400
CUSTOM Pave road
Pave 100 feet of Bryant Street
immediately adjacent to Corydon
Road
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CUSTOM Pedestrian
improvements
Add high visibility crosswalks and
ADA compliant curb ramp at
southeast corner of Corydon Road &
Palomar Street
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CUSTOM Relocate sign and
extend striping
Increase the length of the dashed line
at Corydon Road & Union Street
indicating that the right lane will
become a “trap” dedicated right-turn
only lane to 775 feet, and move “right
lane must turn right” sign back to the
start of this dashed line.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CUSTOM Remove lane Remove right-turn overlap at
Corydon Road & Grand Avenue N/A N/A N/A N/A
CUSTOM Pedestrian
improvements
Add ADA compliant curb ramps at
northeast and southwest corners of
Corydon Road and Grand Avenue
N/A N/A N/A N/A
An exhibit of the proposed safety projects located at Corydon Road & Grand Avenue is provided in Attachment A.7.
263
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 52 Project 12: Mission Trail from Malaga Road to Corydon Road An exhibit of the proposed safety projects is provided in Attachment A.7.
Project 13: Orange Street/Gruwell Street from Bundy Canyon Road to Grand Avenue No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
R1 Add lighting Add street lighting along the entire
segment Night 35% 20 $5,796,420
R34PB Install
sidewalk/pathway
Add sidewalks from Bundy Canyon
Road to Grove Street on the west side
of the roadway
P&B 80% 20 $1,080,677
R35PB
Install/upgrade
pedestrian
crossing
Add crosswalks at Grove Street on
the West leg and Walnut Street on
the West leg
P&B 35% 20 $472,796
CUSTOM Add ADA ramp Construct ADA ramp at Bundy
Canyon Road & Grove Street N/A N/A N/A N/A
An exhibit of the proposed safety projects is provided in Attachment A.7.
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
R1 Add lighting Add segment lighting along the
entire roadway segment Night 35% 20 $10,896,480
R8 Install raised
median
Install raised median from Malaga
Road to Lemon Street All 25% 20 $15,387,400
CUSTOM Pedestrian
improvements
Add ADA compliant curb ramps at all
corners of Mission Trail & Elberta
Road
N/A N/A N/A N/A
264
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 53 Project 14: Palomar Street from Wildomar Trail to Southern City Limit No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
S1 Add lighting
Remove Type 1A signals at Palomar
Street & Clinton Keith Road and replace
with Type 15 to provide more lighting
Night 40% 20 $42,560
NS21PB
Install/upgrade
pedestrian
crossing
Add continental crosswalk at Palomar
Street & Frederick Street P&B 35% 20 $113,261
CUSTOM Add signage and
striping
Add striping and signage to better
indicate that only one lane is present in
each direction from Wildomar Trail
(Central Street) to Frederick Street
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CUSTOM Add delineators
Add delineators to tighten intersection
of Palomar Street & Frederick Street at
southeast corner
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CUSTOM Restripe lane
Re-align left turn pockets in the
eastbound and westbound direction at
Palomar Street & Catt Road
N/A N/A N/A N/A
CUSTOM Add detection
Add video or loop bike detection and
Remove push button for bike crossing
at Palomar Street & Clinton Keith Road
N/A N/A N/A N/A
An exhibit of the proposed safety projects is provided in Attachment A.7.
Project A2: Bundy Canyon Road & Almond Street
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
NS1 Add lighting Add safety lighting at the intersection Night 40% 20 $172,000 NS4 Convert to
roundabout Convert intersection to a roundabout All Varies 20 $1,403,912 An exhibit of a typical roundabout installation is provided in Attachment A.7.
Project A3: Mission Trail & Vine Street
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
S6 Install left turn
phase
Add southbound left-turn pocket on
Mission Trail All 55% 20 $400,840
265
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 54 Project A4: Clinton Keith Road & Hidden Springs Road
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
S21PB
Leading
pedestrian
interval
Add leading pedestrian interval for
northbound right -turn approach on
Hidden Spring Road
P&B 60% 10 $267,841
Project A5: Bundy Canyon Road & Harvest Way E /Club Avenue No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
CUSTOM Add missing stop
sign Add stop sign north of intersection N/A N/A N/A N/A CUSTOM Add signage
Add additional Side Road Symbol Sign
(MUTCD W2-2) and Advance Street
Name Sign (MUTCD D3-2) to help
motorists better anticipate that an
intersection is upcoming where a vehicle
may slow down and turn.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Project A7: Bundy Canyon Road & Raciti Road
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
CUSTOM Add missing stop
sign
Add missing stop sign north of
intersection N/A N/A N/A N/A
CUSTOM Add signage
Add additional Side Road Symbol Sign
(MUTCD W2-2) and Advance Street
Name Sign (MUTCD D3-2) to help
motorists better anticipate that an
intersection is upcoming where a vehicle
may slow down and turn.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Project A8: Mission Trail & Palomar Street
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
NS2
Convert to all-
way STOP
Conduct a warrant to make this
intersection an all-way stop. All 50% 10 $344,000
An exhibit of the proposed safety project is provided in Attachment A.7.
266
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 55 Project A9: Albert Street and Corydon Road and Lakeside Drive No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
CUSTOM Add signage
Add additional Side Road Symbol
Sign (MUTCD W2-2) and Advance
Street Name Sign (MUTCD D3-2) to
help motorists better anticipate that
an intersection is upcoming where a
vehicle may slow down and turn.
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Project A10: Bundy Canyon Road & Monte Vista Drive
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
NS3 Install signals Signalize this intersection All 30% 20 $379,561
Project A11: Bundy Canyon Road & Orchard Street
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
NS3 Install signals Signalize this intersection All 30% 20 $226,081
Project A12: Bundy Canyon Road & Farm Road
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
CUSTOM Add signage Add W 3-3 signal ahead sign
northeast of the intersection N/A N/A N/A N/A
Project A13: Grape Street & Olive Street
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
NS6 Add signage
Add W3-1 stop sign ahead sign on
Grape Street north of the intersection,
and on Olive Street east of the
intersection
All 15% 10 $40,231
Project A14: Baxter Road & I-15 South on and off ramps
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
NS4 Convert to
roundabout Convert intersection to a roundabout All Varies 20 $0 An exhibit of a typical roundabout installation is provided in Attachment A.7. 267
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 56
Project A15: Baxter Road & I-15 North on and off ramps
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
NS4 Convert to
roundabout Convert intersection to a roundabout All Varies 20 $0 An exhibit of a typical roundabout installation is provided in Attachment A.7.
Project A16: Baxter Road between Central Street and Killarney Lane No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
R1 Add lighting Add intersection and segment lighting Night 35% 20 $557,620
Project A17: Bundy Canyon Road between Mission Trail and Sunset Avenue No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
R1 Add lighting Add intersection and segment lighting Night 35% 20 $22,976,940
Project A18: Mission Trail between Corydon Road and Bundy Canyon Road No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
R1 Add lighting Add intersection and segment lighting Night 35% 20 $3,593,521 An exhibit of the proposed safety project is provided in Attachment A.7.
Project A19: Clinton Keith Road between Stable Lanes Road and Elizabeth Lane No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
R1 Add lighting Add intersection and segment lighting Night 35% 20 $4,793,181 An exhibit of the proposed safety project is provided in Attachment A.7.
Project A20: Bundy Canyon Road between Orange Street and I-15 NB ramp No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
CUSTOM Add signage and
striping
Add striping and signage to better
indicate that only one lane is present
in each direction
N/A N/A N/A N/A
268
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 57 Project A21: Clinton Keith Road & Elizabeth Lane
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
CUSTOM Restripe lane Re-align left turn pockets in the
eastbound and westbound direction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Project A22: Clinton Keith Road & Inland Valley Drive
No. Countermeasure
Name Work Description Collision
Type CRF
Project
Life
(years)
Collision
Reduction
Benefits
CUSTOM Restripe lane Re-align left turn pockets in the
eastbound and westbound direction N/A N/A N/A N/A
4.2 COST ESTIMATE
Planning-level cost estimates were developed for each countermeasure and project costs were estimated based on the countermeasures applied to the priority project locations. Cost estimates were prepared based on use of recent bid tabulations and estimates of current construction costs consisting of unit based cost estimates and contingencies. The costs include construction costs and also include engineering and administrative costs. A contingency is added to the construction cost of each project depending on the complexity of the scope. The engineering and administration cost is assumed to be 25% of the total construction cost, including the contingency. The cost estimates are included in the Attachment A.9.
4.3 BENEFIT/COST (B/C) RATIO
A BCR is the ratio of the benefits of a project relative to its costs, both expressed in monetary terms. The Benefit to Cost (B/C) ratio is calculated by taking a project’s overall benefit and dividing it by the overall project cost. Projects with a BCR greater than one (1) have greater benefits than costs; hence, they have positive net benefits. A higher BCR means greater benefits relative to costs, while a lower BCR means fewer benefits relative to costs.
Based on Caltrans’ need for a fair, data-driven, statewide project selection process for HSIP call- for-projects, the benefit and cost calculations were completed using the same process shown in the HSIP Analyzer to calculate the B/C ratio of the project. The B/C ratios were used to identify the projects with high cost effectiveness that have the greatest chance of receiving federal funding in a Caltrans call-for-projects. Table 4.2 summarizes the B/C ratio for all the 43 proposed safety projects.
269
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 58 Table 4.2: Benefits/Cost Ratio Analysis by Safety Project # Location Countermeasure No. Benefits Cost ($) Benefit/Cost Ratio
HSIP
Max
Share*
HSIP
Amount
Local
Amount
1 Mission Trail & Olive
Street
Install guard rail R4 $1,215,300 $9,432 128.85 100% $9,432 $0 Pedestrian improvements CUSTOM $12,648
Total $1,215,300 $22,080 55.04
2 Bundy Canyon Road &
Orange Street
Install left-turn lane S7 $2,479,470 $8,249 300.58 90% $7,424 $825 Provide Advanced
Dilemma Zone Detection S4 $1,423,799 $34,322 41.48 100% $34,322 $0 Improve signal hardware S2 $533,925 $1,415 377.33 100% $1,415 $0 Replace sign CUSTOM $1,565
Total $4,437,194 $45,551 97.41
3 Lemon Street & Mission
Trail
Move driveway CUSTOM N/A
Remove pavement
marking CUSTOM $131
Repaint crosswalk CUSTOM $1,565
Total $1,696
4 Corydon Street &
Mission Trail
Provide Advanced
Dilemma Zone Detection S4 $567,759 $7,847 72.35 100% $7,847 $0 Improve signal hardware S2 $212,910 $36,025 5.91 100% $36,025 $0 Add leading pedestrian
interval S21PB $0 $7,926 0 100% $7,926 $0
Remove lane CUSTOM $1,513
Total $780,669 $51,798 15.07
270
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 59 # Location Countermeasure No. Benefits Cost ($) Benefit/Cost Ratio
HSIP
Max
Share*
HSIP
Amount
Local
Amount
5 Gruwell Street &
Palomar Street
Provide Advanced
Dilemma Zone Detection S4 $287,515 $34,322 8.38 100% $34,322 $0 Improve signal hardware S2 $107,818 $36,811 2.93 100% $36,811 $0 Pedestrian improvements CUSTOM $30,589
Total $395,333 $101,722 3.89
6 Bundy Canyon Road &
Cherry Street
Remove lane CUSTOM $2,037
Restripe lane CUSTOM $4,074
Total $6,111
7 Bryant Street & Palomar
Street
Convert to all-way STOP NS2 $330,700 $11,299 29.27 100% $11,299 $0 Add lighting NS1 $15,960 $55,020 0.29 100% $55,020 $0
Total $346,660 $66,319 5.23
8 Bundy Canyon Road &
Sunset Avenue Add signage NS6
$99,211 $1,565 63.39 100% $1,565 $0
9 Bundy Canyon Road &
Harvest Way
Install signals NS3 $3,763,441 $271,170 13.88 100% $271,170 $0 Add signage CUSTOM $1,605
Total $3,763,441 $272,775 13.80
10 Grand Avenue & Sheila
Lane
Convert to roundabout
NS4
$835,940 $721,189 1.16 100% $721,189 $0
11 Corydon Road from
Mission Trail to Grand
Avenue
Install edge-lines and
centerlines R28 $189,400 $8,810 21.50 100% $8,810 $0
Add lighting NS1 $227,680 $81,679 2.79 100% $81,679 $0
Pave road CUSTOM $108,743
Pedestrian improvements CUSTOM $14,083
271
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 60 # Location Countermeasure No. Benefits Cost ($) Benefit/Cost Ratio
HSIP
Max
Share*
HSIP
Amount
Local
Amount
Install pedestrian
countdown signals S17PB $1,732,300 $22,598 76.66 100% $22,598 $0 Relocate sign and extend
striping CUSTOM $3,537
Remove lane CUSTOM $1,565
Improve signal hardware S2 $27,415 $1,179 23.25 100% $1,179 $0 Provide Advanced
Dilemma Zone Detection S4 $73,106 $34,322 2.13 100% $34,322 $0 Install left-turn lane S7 $127,309 $59,802 2.13 100% $59,802 $0 Pedestrian improvements CUSTOM $15,458
Total $2,377,210 $351,776 6.76
12 Mission Trail from
Malaga Road to
Corydon Road
Add lighting R1 $10,896,480 $735,238 14.82 100% $735,238 $0 Install raised median R8 $15,387,400 $1,194,196 12.89 90% $1,074,776 $119,420 Pedestrian improvements CUSTOM $30,589
Total $26,283,880 $1,960,023 13.41
13 Orange Street/Gruwell
Street from Bundy
Canyon Road to Grand
Avenue
Add lighting R1 $5,796,420 $1,299,651 4.46 100% $1,299,651 $0 Install sidewalk/pathway R34PB $1,080,677 $794,227 1.36 90% $714,804 $79,423 Install/upgrade pedestrian
crossing R35PB $472,796 $943 501.37 90% $849 $94
Add ADA ramp CUSTOM $15,458
Total $7,349,893 $2,110,279 3.48
14 Palomar Street from
Wildomar Trail to
Southern City Limit
Add signage and striping CUSTOM $10,356
Add delineators CUSTOM $694
Install/upgrade pedestrian
crossing NS21PB $113,261 $4,716 24.02 100% $4,716 $0
Restripe lane CUSTOM $4,395
272
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 61 # Location Countermeasure No. Benefits Cost ($) Benefit/Cost Ratio
HSIP
Max
Share*
HSIP
Amount
Local
Amount
Add lighting S1 $42,560 $113,512 0.37 100% $113,512 $0
Add detection CUSTOM $3,131
Total $155,821 $136,804 1.14
A2 Bundy Canyon Road &
Almond Street
Add lighting NS1 $172,000 $42,575 4.04 100% $42,575 $0
Convert to roundabout NS4 $1,403,912 $797,043 1.76 100% $797,043 $0 Total $1,575,912 $839,618 1.88
A3 Mission Trail & Vine
Street Install left turn phase S6 $400,840 $3,603 111.25 90% $3,243 $360 A4 Clinton Keith Road &
Hidden Springs Road
Leading pedestrian
interval S21PB $267,841 $7,827 34.22 100% $7,827 $0
A5
Bundy Canyon Road &
Harvest Way E /Club
Avenue
Add missing stop sign CUSTOM $773
Add signage CUSTOM $1,565
Total $2,338
A7 Bundy Canyon Road &
Raciti Road
Add missing stop sign CUSTOM $793
Add signage CUSTOM $1,565
Total $2,358
A8 Mission Trail & Palomar
Street Convert to all-way STOP NS2 $344,000 $12,642 27.21 100% $12,642 $0 A9
Albert Street and
Corydon Road and
Lakeside Drive
Add signage CUSTOM $1,565
A10 Bundy Canyon Road &
Monte Vista Drive Install signals NS3 $379,561 $271,170 1.40 100% $271,170 $0 273
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 62 # Location Countermeasure No. Benefits Cost ($) Benefit/Cost Ratio
HSIP
Max
Share*
HSIP
Amount
Local
Amount
A11 Bundy Canyon Road &
Orchard Street Install signals NS3 $226,081 $271,170 0.83 100% $271,170 $0 A12 Bundy Canyon Road &
Farm Road Add signage CUSTOM $793
A13 Grape Street & Olive
Street Add signage NS06 $40,231 $1,565 25.71 100% $1,565 $0 A14 Baxter Road & I-15
South on and off ramps Convert to roundabout NS4 $0 $641,772 100% $652,722 $0 A15 Baxter Road & I-15
North on and off ramps Convert to roundabout NS4 $0 $641,772 100% $652,722 $0 A16
Baxter Road between
Central Street and
Killarney Lane
Add lighting R1 $557,620 $374,791 1.49 100% $374,791 $0 A17
Bundy Canyon Road
between Mission Trail
and Sunset Avenue
Add lighting R1 $22,976,940 $2,764,100 8.31 100% $2,764,100 $0 A18
Mission Trail between
Corydon Road and
Bundy Canyon Road
Add lighting R1 $3,593,521 $322,522 11.14 100% $322,522 $0 A19
Clinton Keith Road
between Stable Lanes
Road and Elizabeth
Lane
Add lighting R1 $4,793,181 $577,448 8.30 100% $577,448 $0 A20
Bundy Canyon Road
between Orange Street
and I-15 NB ramp
Add signage and striping CUSTOM $8,188
A21 Clinton Keith Road &
Elizabeth Lane Restripe lane CUSTOM $4,716
A22 Clinton Keith Road &
Inland Valley Drive Restripe lane CUSTOM $5,168
* Note: HSIP guidelines state that a project will receive the lowest reimbursement rate of the applied countermeasures. 274
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 63
4.4 PROJECT PRIORITIZATION
To develop a prioritized list of safety projects for the HSIP application and to maximize the City’s opportunity of receiving funding, KOA further refined the BCR calculation by using the same process shown in the HSIP Analyzer. The B/C ratios were used to identify the projects with high cost-effectiveness that have the greatest chance of receiving federal funding in a Caltrans call- for-projects.
Because HSIP grants are competitive, it is typically appropriate to only apply for projects that have an estimated BCR that is high. For the purpose of this SSAR, all projects with BCRs of 8 or more were prioritized. A high BCR is not the only reason to apply for HSIP funding for a project.
For instance, some projects that have very high BCRs (over 100) are low cost. As the minimum request for funding for an HSIP grant needs to be at least $100,000, enough projects and intersections need to be combined to reach this minimum amount if a project is low cost.
For projects under $15,000 at intersections or segments without other improvements, KOA recommends the City to consider implementing these projects using local funds. For other projects, KOA recommends the City consider applying for HSIP funding. Projects are divided into these two categories based on recommended funding source, and then ranked by BCR of the most beneficial countermeasure per location in Table 4.3 and Table 4.4. Some projects that do not have a BCR of 8 were included as they are easily grouped with other similar projects or other intersection treatments.
BCR is not the only reason to implement a countermeasure, and thus the prioritization list is only a recommendation, and the City may choose to move forward with any of these prioritized projects in any order. The City has already completed an application for HSIP Cycle 10 funding during the draft stage of this plan; projects included as part of the application are indicated with an asterisk. If the applications are successful, these projects should not be applied for in the future, but if unsuccessful, they can be considered for funding in future cycles. The City may use this list of projects to consider and determine which will be prioritized based on other considerations the City may have in selecting which projects to apply for funding. 275
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 64 Table 4.3: Prioritized Projects to Consider for HSIP Funding # Location Countermeasure No. Benefits Cost ($) Benefit/Cost Ratio
HSIP Max
Share
HSIP
Amount
Local
Amount
2 Bundy Canyon Road
& Orange Street
Improve signal hardware* S2 $533,925 $1,415 377.33 100% $1,415 $0 Install left-turn lane* S7 $2,479,470 $8,249 300.58 90% $7,424 $825 Provide Advanced Dilemma
Zone Detection* S4 $1,423,799 $34,322 41.48 100% $34,322 $0 4 Corydon Street &
Mission Trail
Provide Advanced Dilemma
Zone Detection* S4 $567,759 $7,847 72.35 100% $7,847 $0 Improve signal hardware* S2 $212,910 $36,025 5.91 100% $36,025 $0 11 Corydon Road from
Mission Trail to Grand
Avenue
Install pedestrian
countdown signals S17PB $1,732,300 $22,598 76.66 100% $22,598 $0 Improve signal hardware* S2 $27,415 $1,179 23.25 100% $1,179 $0 Install edge-lines and
centerlines R28 $189,400 $8,810 21.50 100% $8,810 $0
Provide Advanced Dilemma
Zone Detection* S4 $73,106 $34,322 2.13 100% $34,322 $0 Install left-turn lane* S7 $127,309 $59,802 2.13 100% $59,802 $0 14 Palomar Street from
Wildomar Trail to
Southern City Limit
Install/upgrade pedestrian
crossing NS21PB $113,261 $4,716 24.02 100% $4,716 $0
12 Mission Trail from
Malaga Road to
Corydon Road
Add lighting* R1 $10,896,480 $735,238 14.82 100% $735,238 $0 Install raised median R8 $15,387,400 $1,194,196 12.89 90% $1,074,776 $119,420 276
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 65 # Location Countermeasure No. Benefits Cost ($) Benefit/Cost Ratio
HSIP Max
Share
HSIP
Amount
Local
Amount
9 Bundy Canyon Road
& Harvest Way Install signals* NS3 $3,763,441 $271,170 13.88 100% $271,170 $0 A18
Mission Trail between
Corydon Road and
Bundy Canyon Road
Add lighting* R1 $3,593,521 $322,522 11.14 100% $322,522 $0 5 Gruwell Street &
Palomar Street
Provide Advanced Dilemma
Zone Detection* S4 $287,515 $34,322 8.38 100% $34,322 $0 Improve signal hardware* S2 $107,818 $36,811 2.93 100% $36,811 $0 A17
Bundy Canyon Road
between Mission Trail
and Sunset Avenue
Add lighting R1 $22,976,940 $2,764,100 8.31 100% $2,764,100 $0 A19
Clinton Keith Road
between Stable Lanes
Road and Elizabeth
Lane
Add lighting* R1 $4,793,181 $577,448 8.30 100% $577,448 $0 *City applied for this project in HSIP Cycle 10, funding announcement pending
277
Safety Projects
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 66 Table 4.4: Prioritized Projects to Consider for Local Funding # Location Countermeasure No. Benefits Cost ($) Benefit/Cost Ratio
HSIP Max
Share
HSIP
Amount
Local
Amount
13 Orange Street/Gruwell
Street from Bundy
Canyon Road to Grand
Avenue
Install/upgrade
pedestrian crossing R35PB $472,796 $943 501.37 90% $849 $94 1 Mission Trail & Olive
Street Install guard rail R4 $1,215,300 $9,432 128.85 100% $9,432 $0 A3 Mission Trail & Vine
Street Install left turn phase S6 $400,840 $3,603 111.25 90% $3,243 $360 8 Bundy Canyon Road &
Sunset Avenue
Add signage
NS6
$99,211 $1,565 63.39 100% $1,565 $0
A4 Clinton Keith Road &
Hidden Springs Road
Leading pedestrian
interval S21PB $267,841 $7,827 34.22 100% $7,827 $0
7 Bryant Street & Palomar
Street
Convert to all-way
STOP NS2 $330,700 $11,299 29.27 100% $11,299 $0
A8 Mission Trail & Palomar
Street
Convert to all-way
STOP NS2 $344,000 $12,642 27.21 100% $12,642 $0
A13 Grape Street & Olive
Street Add signage NS06 $40,231 $1,565 25.71 100% $1,565 $0 14 Palomar Street from
Wildomar Trail to
Southern City Limit
Install/upgrade
pedestrian crossing NS21PB $113,261 $4,716 24.02 100% $4,716 $0 278
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 67 ATTACHMENT A.1 – INTERSECTION RANKING BY
COLLISION FREQUENCY
279
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 68 ATTACHMENT A.2 – TRAFFIC COUNTS FOR SELECTED
INTERSECTIONS
280
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 69 ATTACHMENT A.3 – COLLISION DIAGRAMS FOR
SELECTED INTERSECTIONS
281
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 70 ATTACHMENT A.4 – ROADWAY SEGMENT RANKING
BY COLLISION FREQUENCY (WITH AND WITHOUT
COLLISIONS OCCURRING AT INTERSECTIONS)
282
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 71 ATTACHMENT A.5 – TRAFFIC COUNTS FOR SELECTED
ROADWAY SEGMENTS
283
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 72 ATTACHMENT A.6 – COLLISION DIAGRAMS FOR
SELECTED ROADWAY SEGMENTS
284
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 73 ATTACHMENT A.7 – CONCEPTS FOR SELECTED
PROJECTS
285
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 74 ATTACHMENT A.8 – COLLISION REDUCTION OUTPUT
FROM HSIP ANALYZER
286
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 75 ATTACHMENT A.9 – SAFETY PROJECT COST
ESTIMATION
287
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX 76 ATTACHMENT A.10 – SELECTED COLLISION HEAT
MAPS
288
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX APPENDIX C – COMMUNITY MEETING
PRESENTATION, APRIL 13, 2022
289
Local Roadway Safety Plan (CIP 051-1)
CITY OF WILDOMAR | City Council Workshop, April 13, 2022 290
CONSULTANT BACKGROUND
HAS LED OVER 30 LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLANS
ACROSS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SINCE 2017
BACKGROUND IN SAFETY, ENGINEERING, AND
COMMUNITY PLANNING
GRANT-READY PROJECTS: WON OVER $150 MILLION IN
GRANT FUNDING FOR CLIENTS
291
Goal:
Systematically analyze safety problems and develop recommended infrastructure and non-infrastructure improvements..
Project builds on the City’s adopted vision statement:
The City of Wildomar will be a safe and active community with responsible growth and quality infrastructure while keeping a hometown feel.
LRSP PURPOSE
292
SSAR
• Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR)- predecessor to the LRSP o Analyzed 11 high risk intersections and 4 high risk corridors o Developed 34 potential safety recommendations
o Report finalized in January 2021
• City successfully applied for two Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grants
o $272,900 for a new signal at Bundy Canyon Road and Harvest Way (West) o $375,200 for signal hardware improvements and left-turn lanes at four intersections
• Other recommendations have been incorporated into the City’s CIP Program where applicable
• Some safety recommendations have been shared with Land Development projects for incorporation into their plans 293
LRSP BACKGROUND/SUMMARY
• Citywide collision analysis
• Stakeholder Outreach
• Four “E”s
o Engineering
o Enforcement
o Education
o Emergency Services
• Recommendations
o Safety improvement projects (new infrastructure)
o Strategies and policies (non-infrastructure)
294
OUTREACH APPROACH
• Stakeholder meeting held on Thursday, January 20
• Stakeholders
o Riverside County Sheriff’s Department
o Lake Elsinore Unified School District
o CalFIRE/Riverside County Fire Department
o Riverside Transit Agency
o City of Lake Elsinore
o County of Riverside Dept. of Transportation
• Today’s Workshop
295
NON-ENGINEERING STRATEGIES
• School programs
• Adult bicycle skills courses
• Social media campaigns
EDUCATION
• Speed trailers
• Checkpoints
ENFORCEMENT
• Emergency Vehicle Pre-
emption (EVP)
• GPS Opticom technology
• Response times to remote
areas
EMERGENCY VEHICLES
296
• New signals and signal operational improvements
• Pedestrian improvements on busy corridors and near schools • New street lighting
ENGINEERING STRATEGIES
MISSION TRAIL
297
DRAFT PROJECT
LOCATIONS
No. Location Recommendation(s)
1 Hidden Springs Rd /
Clinton Keith Rd
Modify Turn Phases
2 Almond St / Bundy
Canyon Rd
Signalize Intersection
3 Grand Ave, Corydon
Rd to City Limits
Street lighting, bike
lanes, and sidewalks
4 Mission Trail /
Corydon Rd
Modify Turn Phases,
bike lanes, sidewalks
5 Palomar St / Corydon
Rd
Bike lanes and
sidewalks
6 Mission Trail, Corydon
Rd to City Limits
Street lighting, bike
lanes, and sidewalks
7 Gruwell St / Grand Signalize Intersection
298
Questions / Comments?
299
HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP)
• Seeks to fund countermeasures that will reduce traffic collisions and fatalities
• Cities must have an LRSP to apply
• Minimum project cost of $100,000
• Funds improvements in locations with a significant demonstrated collision history or as part of a broader citywide package • Cycle 11 forthcoming
300
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS)
• Funds programs related to the following:
o Alcohol Impaired Driving
o Distracted Driving
o Drug-Impaired Driving
o Emergency Medical Services
o Motorcycle Safety
o Occupant Protection
o Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety
o Police Traffic Services
o Public Relations, Advertising, and Marketing Program
o Traffic Records
• Most recent cycle closed January 31, 2022 (typically calls for projects are announced on an annual basis in December)
• An LRSP can provide evidence for traffic safety issues in the City 301
TIMELINE
Date Milestone
Evaluation/implementation of the
LRSP
4/29/2022
HSIP Call for Projects 5/9/2022
Draft LRSP 5/13/2022
Final LRSP 5/29/2022
HSIP Applications Due 9/12/2022
302
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX APPENDIX D – COMMUNITY MEETING MINUTES,
APRIL 13, 2022
303
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX Participant 1:
• Use of cameras on Neighborhood Street Watch Watch program to identify offending vehicles, sending registered owners a courtesy letter that vehicle was observed speeding or running a stop sign.
• Remove stop signs, too many.
• Remove plants and improve line of sight.
• School programs are a waste of resources, as parents teach bad habits and schools can’t correct.
• Social media is ineffective, “just a way for people to [complain]” • Doing community service or jail time only real deterrent.
Participant 2:
• Supports light at Gruwell & Grand, due to lots of people walking and horses • Consider 3 or 4 second light delay (LPI)
• Not enough bike trails, traffic doesn’t pay attention to bikers. • Need more enforcement of kids on scooters and e-bikes.
Participant 3:
• Complained about consultants
• Palomar & Clinton Keith- needs a cop on a corner or cameras, “accident waiting to happen.” Problem is east to west on Clinton Keith, go past red lights. • Kaiser development- pile of dirt, one side has rails, needs rails on both sides (Wildomar Trail)
Participant 4:
• Clinton Keith from Inland Valley Drive to (east) City Limits- o Wants updated traffic counts (claims they’ve “quadrupled”) o EB on Clinton Keith at Inland Valley, “race” to get in the lane, jockeying back and forth all the way to Murrieta
o WB on Clinton Keith, 2 lanes in Murrieta, jockeying back and forth. Add striping between (east) city line and Covington
o May be in design phase, but participant is frustrated with lack of progress o Stores on Murrieta side increasing amount of traffic
o Clinton Keith “on the list” for safety improvements
• Supports traffic signal at Gruwell & Grand, at least put up a light at this intersection • Gruwell between Grand and Orange
o 50 mph street, needs to be reduced
o Put more speed limit signs, add signs saying speed checked by radar o Add speed enforcement zone sign (add to Clinton Keith) • Sheila and Grand- stop sign with beacon exists
o Add pole light
304
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX o Temecula has stop ahead signs with yellow outline blinking, add these to this location
• Schools- streets in front are no drop off zones
o Grand in front of David E. Brown school, drop offs are dangerous Participant 5 (council):
• Also keep an eye on Palomar
• Palomar & Clinton Keith a wide intersection
• Clinton Keith & Hidden Springs- improvements now or when development comes in? • Clinton Keith- freeway to Murrieta, motor cop does a lot of time and ticket writing Cameron/Jason:
• Palomar & Clinton Keith- CIP Improvement project out to bid • Wildomar completed pedestrian ped head countdown project • Clinton Keith- still in design, working through environmental permitting and ROW acquisition, no construction date yet
• Gruwell speed limit- 85th percentile limits speed adjustment, consider traffic calming • Sheila & Grand- go after grant funding for roundabout
305
CITY OF WILDOMAR | LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN APPENDIX APPENDIX E – WILDOMAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES, APRIL 13, 2022
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (CIP 051-1)
CITY OF WILDOMAR | September 14, 2022
319
Goal:
Systematically analyze safety problems and develop recommended infrastructure and non-infrastructure improvements.
Project builds on the City’s adopted vision statement:
“The City of Wildomar will be a safe and active community with responsible growth and quality infrastructure while keeping a hometown feel.”
LRSP PURPOSE
320
SSAR
• Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR) - predecessor to the LRSP
• Analyzed 11 high risk intersections and 4 high risk
corridors
• Developed 34 potential safety recommendations
• Report finalized in January 2021
• City successfully applied for two Highway Safety
Improvement Program (HSIP) grants
• $272,900 for a new signal at Bundy Canyon Road
and Harvest Way (West)
• $375,200 for signal hardware improvements and
left-turn lanes at four intersections
• Other recommendations have been incorporated into the City’s CIP Program where applicable
• Some safety recommendations have been shared with
Land Development projects for incorporation into their
plans
321
LRSP BACKGROUND/SUMMARY
• Citywide collision analysis
• Stakeholder Outreach
• Four “E”s
• Engineering
• Enforcement
• Education
• Emergency Services
• Recommendations
• Safety improvement projects (new
infrastructure)
• Strategies and policies (non-
infrastructure)
322
OUTREACH APPROACH
• Stakeholder meeting held on Thursday, January 20
• Stakeholders
• Riverside County Sheriff’s Department
• Lake Elsinore Unified School District
• CalFIRE/Riverside County Fire Department
• Riverside Transit Agency
• City of Lake Elsinore
• County of Riverside Dept. of Transportation
• April 2022 City Council Workshop
323
NON-ENGINEERING STRATEGIES
School programs
Adult bicycle skills courses
Social media campaigns
EDUCATION
Speed trailers
Checkpoints
ENFORCEMENT
Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption (EVP)
GPS Opticom technology
Response times to remote areas
EMERGENCY VEHICLES
324
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
325
Questions / Comments?
326
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.10
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
Calendar and Holiday Home Decoration Contests
SUBMITTED BY:
Daniel Torres, Community Services
PREPARED BY:
Daniel Torres,
Community Services Director
ACTION:
Receive and file the Calendar and Holiday Home Decoration Contests from by the Community Services Department.
SUMMARY:
This staff report presents the three upcoming contests that Wildomar Residents will be able to participant in.
BACKGROUND:
Throughout the years the Community Services Department engages Wildomar residents with opportunities to participate in multiple programs. One of these programs is the Holiday Home decoration contest where residents who decorate their home for the Christmas holiday season may compete to be recognized as winner of the different decorating categories. Also, for several years the City has conducted a Calendar Photo Contest where the City invited both amateur and professional photographers of all ages to submit their best photos that suit that year's criteria. The photos are judged by city staff and Mayor for consideration to be included in the following year's City distributed calendar.
DISCUSSION:
The Community Services Department will be conducting the mentioned contest this year and introducing a new contest for residents. Wildomar will be holding its first Halloween House Contest this season. The contest is open to all residents of Wildomar and judged based on the criteria developed by city staff. Winners will receive yard signs and will be recognized at the City's Trunk or Treat Event. Contestants will be added to the map sharing the locations of decorated homes in Wildomar.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funding for these programs have been budgeted in the General Fund for the 2022/23 fiscal 327
year. The expenditures will consist of printing yard signs for the home decoration contest and the printing of calendars for distribution.
ACCOUNT CODE:
100-410-4610-52016
328
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.11
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
Second Amendment to the Services Agreement between the
City of Wildomar and Infinity Technologies for monthly IT and GIS Services
SUBMITTED BY:
Robert
Howell, Administrative Services
PREPARED BY:
Robert
Howell, Administrative Services Director
ACTION:
Authorize the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment to the Information Technology Services Agreement with Infinity Technologies.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council awarded an agreement for Information Technology services to Infinity Technologies on May 21, 2021, in the amount of $96,000.
In addition to the awarded agreement the city waived the Request for Proposal requirement, per Section 3.28.040 of the Municipal Code and deemed the proposed Professional Services Agreement with Infinity Technologies as advantageous to the City. The key finding for the waiver was that the staff under the former Interwest Consulting Agreement left the company after the acquisition by Safe Built, Inc. Safe Built, Inc. no longer offers the Information Technology services.
Similarly, the staff providing Geographic Information System (GIS) Services has left Safe Built, Inc. and joined Infinity Technologies.
The First Amendment with Infinity Technologies add GIS services a cost of $2,000 per month, which brought the contract total to $120,000 per year.
329
DISCUSSION:
Staff members from both the City and Infinity Technologies have had discussions regarding adding a second day of in-person coverage for general IT Services at a cost of $11,300 per month. This is an increase of $2,700 per month, or $32,400 per year, to provide the additional in-person day.
Staff from the GIS Section of Infinity Technologies reviewed the amount of work completed for the City of Wildomar between December 2021 and July 2022 for standard and special GIS projects and brought to staff the results of the review. That review found that GIS staff had completed 260 hours of standard work and 208 hours of special projects for a total of 468 hours of work. The cost of these hours if the City would have paid the hourly rates listed in the First Amendment would have been approximately $50,000. The city's cost of these hours was only the $2,000 monthly payment, or $16,000 for the months reviewed.
Based on the review Infinity Technologies has requested an increase in their standard monthly fee, from $2,000 to $3,200 per month for standard GIS services. For special projects Infinity Technologies has requested an annual not-to-exceed amount of $25,000. The annual amount for special GIS services would include licenses for aerial mapping. The increase in GIS Services would be $14,400 per year in standard services plus the $25,000 in Special Projects, or a total of $39,900.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The additional IT Services have been budgeted in the General Fund for the 2022-2023 fiscal year. GIS Services have been budgeted for in the City's Gas Tax Fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
IT and GIS Services - 2nd Amendment 9-14-2022 v2.docx
City of Wildomar- IT Services Proposal Updated 2_21.pdf Wildomar - GIS Services Proposal 2022 - v2.pdf
330
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN
CITY OF WILDOMAR AND INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES.
This Second Amendment to the Agreement for Services between City of Wildomar and Infinity Technoloiges, Inc. (“Second Amendment”), which is dated September 14, 2022 (“Effective Date”) is hereby entered into by and between the CITY OF WILDOMAR, a California general law city (“City”), and Infinity Technoloigies, an Information Technology Service Provider (“Service Provider”) as follows:
RECITALS
A. City and Service Provider entered into an Agreement for Services (“Agreement”) dated May 26, 2021
.
B. City and Service Provider entered into a First Amendment (“First Amendment”) to add monthly Geographic Information System (GIS) Support that was approved by the City Council on October 13, 2021.
C. This Second Amendment amends the scope of services and compensation to Service Provider.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises made and recited herein, the parties do hereby enter into this Second Amendment, which modifies and amends the Agreement as follows:
1. Exhibit A. Scope of Services. Exhibit “A” to the Agreement is replaced in its entirety with Exhibit “A” to this Second Amendment.
2. Section 4(a). Compensation and Method of Payment. Section 4, paragraph (a) of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“(a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Service Provider the amounts specified in Exhibit “B” “Compensation” and made a part of this Agreement by this reference. The total compensation per fiscal year, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed One Hundred Ninety-Nine thousand dollars ($199,000) unless additional compensation is approved in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement. In accordance with California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the Not to Exceed Amount exceeds TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00), this Agreement and the Service Provider's books and records related to this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement.”
3. Exhibit B. Compensation. Exhibit “B” is replaced in its entirety with Exhibit “B” to this Second Amendment.
331
4. Remainder Unchanged. Except as specifically modified and amended in this Second Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and binding upon the parties.
5. Integration. This Second Amendment constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the transaction discussed in this Second Amendment.
6. Applicable Law . The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Second Amendment.
7. References. All references to the Agreement include all their respective terms and provisions. All defined terms utilized in this Second Amendment have the same meaning as provided in the Agreement, unless expressly stated to the contrary in this Second Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment to the Agreement on the date and year first written above.
THE CITY OF WILDOMAR INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES
By: By:
Daniel A. York Mohammad Ahmad
City Manager President
ATTEST:
Janet Morales, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Thomas D. Jex, City Attorney
332
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. IT SERVICES. Service Provider will perform the following IT Services:
Monthly Support
Infinity Technologies will provide support for your mission-critical systems, including desktops, network equipment, City Software, Microsoft office 365 Email System, Mobile Devices and Server Management. The services listed below are included in our flat monthly fee:
1. On-Site 2 Days a week (flexible with City's schedule)
2. Assist with Council and Planning Commission meetings
3. 24 x 7 x 365 Technical Support
4. 24 x 7 x 365 Unlimited Remote Support (Help Desk)
5. After hour and holiday support
6. Response times (Described in SLA)
7. Tyler Eden Software Support
8. Department Outreach
9. City Software Support
10. Proactive network monitoring and backup services
11. Remote support for desktops onsite and offsite
12. Network and infrastructure support
13. Support for desktops/laptops
14. Server maintenance and backup
15. Administration of Office 365
16. Mobile devices
17. Install/Configure new Computers and Servers
18. IT procurement processes
19. Printer/Copier user support (connectivity for onsite users)
20. RingCentral Phone System Support
21. Emergency Services Support (EOC Training – One Day a year)
22. Asset control/Replacement Schedule – Asset Management
23. Help Finance Staff in creating a RFP for Financial ERP Software
24. Website Support and Training
25. Ransomware Protection Deployment
26. Help Procure Equipment
27. One stop shop all things technology
28. Monthly Meeting with City Leadership
29. Cyber Security training
II. GIS SERVICES. Service Provider will perform the following GIS Services:
Monthly Support
Infinity Technologies is submitting this quote that will provide the City of Wildomar with a reliable set of GIS services. Infinity Technologies will offer the following GIS services under a flat monthly fee:
333
▪ Quarterly updates of parcel and street GIS data
▪ As-needed data updates Public Works asset layers, planning layers, and districts ▪ Custom hardcopy/digital mapping requests.
▪ Analysis and report creation.
▪ Maintenance of the existing WebGIS applications for staff and public use. ▪ ArcGIS Online administration.
▪ Fulfilling GIS Data requests.
Special GIS Support Projects
Additionally, we have a broad set of experience and expertise to offer GIS support services beyond the scope outlined above for any new or special projects. In these instances, we will work with you to develop a task order and budget to ensure they meet your time and cost expectations. Once the task order is approved and work has started, hours will be billed on time and materials basis. Examples of special projects include:
▪ New public mapping applications
▪ New staff mapping applications
▪ New GIS data development (Master Address Database)
▪ NG911 GIS data compliance
▪ Mobile field collection solutions
▪ GIS support of new business systems (permitting, asset management, code enforcement)
▪ Zoning and general plan data realignment
334
EXHIBIT B
COMPENSATION
I. Service Provider shall use the following rates of pay in the performance of the Services:
IT Services - $11,300 per month flat fee.
GIS Services - $3,200 per month flat fee.
Special GIS Projects shall be billed at the hourly rates below and shall not exceed $25,000 per fiscal year.
Name Title Rate Primary Task Responsibility
Mark Dumford Project Manager $160 Project Management
Todd Lighthizer Sr. GIS Analyst $125 GIS Review and Needs Jared Schuckert Sr. GIS Analyst $125 WebGIS Maintenance, ArcGIS Online Admin, Peter Pang Sr. GIS Analyst $125 ArcGIS Online Admin, Project Management, Quality Control
Abby Thornton GIS Analyst $105 WebGIS Maintenance, Data Maintenance, Mapping, Analysis/Reports
Ryan Gonzalez GIS Tech $95 Data Maintenance, Mapping, New WebGIS Applications, Data Requests
Alex Larsen GIS Tech $95 Data Maintenance, Mapping, New WebGIS Applications, Data Requests
II. Service Provider may utilize sub-contractors as indicated in this Agreement. The hourly rate for any subcontractor is not to exceed $100.00 per hour without written authorization from the City Manager or designee.
III. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $199,000 per fiscal year, as provided in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement. 335
1 City of Wildomar, CA March 21, 2022 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES AND COST QUOTE FOR: MONTHLY IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT Introduction Infinity Technologies would like to thank the City of Wildomar for the opportunity to provide a quote for services to continue to support your technology needs. Infinity Technologies has extensive experience in developing city IT departments from the ground up, as well as maintaining a high level of service for ongoing management of City technology requirements. Infinity Technologies is submitting this quote that will provide the City of Wildomar with a reliable set of technology services including a help desk to support your network and desktop PCs, provide reliable server management, administer your email system and support your mobile devices. We will continue to offer these services under a flat monthly technology fee. Additionally, we have a broad set of experience and expertise to offer IT services beyond the scope outlined below for any new or special projects. In these instances, we will work with you to develop budget to ensure they meet your time and cost expectations. Monthly Support - Scope of Services Infinity Technologies will provide support for your mission-critical systems, including desktops, network equipment, City Software, Microsoft office 365 Email System, Mobile Devices and Server Management. The services listed below are included in our flat monthly fee: 1. On-Site 2 Days a week (flexible with City's schedule) 2. Assist with Council and Planning Commission meetings 3. 24 x 7 x 365 Technical Support 4. 24 x 7 x 365 Unlimited Remote Support (Help Desk) 5. After hour and holiday support 6. Response times (Described in SLA) 7. Tyler Eden Software Support 8. Department Outreach 9. City Software Support 10. Proactive network monitoring and backup services 11. Remote support for desktops onsite and offsite 12. Network and infrastructure support 13. Support for desktops/laptops 14. Server maintenance and backup 15. Administration of Office 365 16. Mobile devices 17. Install/Configure new Computers and Servers 18. IT procurement processes 336
2 19. Printer/Copier user support (connectivity for onsite users) 20. RingCentral Phone System Support 21. Emergency Services Support (EOC Training – One Day a year) 22. Asset control/Replacement Schedule – Asset Management 23. Help Finance Staff in creating a RFP for Financial ERP Software 24. Website Support and Training 25. Ransomware Protection Deployment 26. Help Procure Equipment 27. One stop shop all things technology 28. Monthly Meeting with City Leadership 29. Cyber Security training Monthly Support Revised Flat fee for monthly services $11,300 INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (SLA) 1. One reach local phone number and email address for emergency support 2. Provide 24 x 7 x 365 support 3. Respond to emergency outages (1) hour during normal business hours 4. Respond to emergency outages (2) hours during non-business hours 5. In case of an emergency, be onsite within (4) hours 6. Provide unlimited technical phone support 7. Trouble Tickets will be acknowledged within (30) minutes during normal business hours 8. Typical response time during normal business hours a. Password reset (15) minutes b. Create new user (1) hour c. Installing desktop application (1) hour d. Troubleshoot/Desktop repair (30) minutes e. Adding desktop printer (15) minutes Additional Option: Monthly Support (3 Days – 24 Hour/Week) Revised Flat fee for monthly services $14,500 337
CITY OF WILDOMAR, CA August 1, 2022
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES AND COST QUOTE FOR:
MONTHLY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) SUPPORT
Introduction
Infinity Technologies would like to thank the City of Wildomar for the opportunity to provide a quote for services to continue to support your GIS needs. Infinity Technologies has extensive experience in implementing and supporting a city-wide GIS from the ground up, as well as maintaining a high level of service for ongoing day-to-day City GIS requests.
Monthly Support - Scope of Services
Infinity Technologies is submitting this quote that will provide the City of Wildomar with a reliable set of GIS services. Infinity Technologies will offer the following GIS services under a flat monthly fee:
▪ Quarterly updates of parcel and street GIS
data
▪ As-needed data updates Public Works asset
layers, planning layers, and districts
▪ Custom hardcopy/digital mapping requests.
▪ Analysis and report creation.
▪ Maintenance of the existing WebGIS
applications for staff and public use.
▪ ArcGIS Online administration.
▪ Fulfilling GIS Data requests.
Special GIS Support Projects – Scope of Services
Additionally, we have a broad set of experience and expertise to offer GIS support services beyond the scope outlined above for any new or special projects. In these instances, we will work with you to develop a task order and budget to ensure they meet your time and cost expectations. Once the task order is approved and work has started, hours will be billed on time and materials basis. Examples of special projects include:
▪ New public mapping applications
▪ New staff mapping applications
▪ New GIS data development (Master
Address Database)
▪ NG911 GIS data compliance
▪ Mobile field collection solutions
▪ GIS support of new business systems
(permitting, asset management, code
enforcement)
▪ Zoning and general plan data
realignment
338
Infinity Technologies Monthly GIS Support
Flat fee for monthly GIS services $3,200
Infinity Technologies Estimated Annual Budget for Special GIS Projects Annual NTE budget for special GIS support projects $25,000 Infinity Technologies GIS Staff/Hourly Rates (Special Project Requests) Name Title Rate Primary Task Responsibility
Mark Dumford Project Manager $160 Project Management
Todd Lighthizer Sr. GIS Analyst $125 GIS Review and Needs Jared Schuckert Sr. GIS Analyst $125 WebGIS Maintenance, ArcGIS Online Admin, Peter Pang Sr. GIS Analyst $125 ArcGIS Online Admin, Project Management, Quality Control Abby Thornton GIS Analyst $105 WebGIS Maintenance, Data Maintenance, Mapping, Analysis/Reports Ryan Gonzalez GIS Tech $95 Data Maintenance, Mapping, New WebGIS Applications, Data Requests Alex Larsen GIS Tech $95 Data Maintenance, Mapping, New WebGIS Applications, Data Requests
339
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.12
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Single Audit Report
SUBMITTED BY:
Robert
Howell, Administrative Services
PREPARED BY:
Robert
Howell, Administrative Services Director
ACTION:
Receive and File the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Single Audit Report SUMMARY:
The City's auditing firm, Teaman, Ramirez & Smith, Inc. has completed the work on the City's Single Audit for the 2020-2021 fiscal year. At the completion of their work the auditors did not identify any material weaknesses, significant deficiencies, or instances of noncompliance, and found that the City has complied with all of the compliance requirements on its major programs..
BACKGROUND:
The firm of Teaman, Ramirez & Smith, Inc. has complete the work on the Single Audit of the City’s federal award expenditures. The Federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requires a Single Audit Report when a grantee (state, local or tribal government) expends more than $750,000 in federal dollars in one year. The audit is called a Single Audit because “The Single Audit Act of 1984” standardized audits for entities receiving federal dollars.
DISCUSSION:
In the 2020-2021 fiscal year the City of Wildomar expended $784,276 in federal dollars.
Included in the expenditures was $318,313 for guardrails, $217,407 for Pedestrian Crosswalk Countdown Heads, $211,953 in CARES Act funding, and $36,603 in Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) for the second phase of the Sedco Sidewalk Project.
The Single Audit Report is comprised of two categorical reports. The first report is on internal controls, compliance and other matters based on an audit performed in accordance with Government Accounting Standards. At the completion of the review, no material weaknesses, significant deficiencies or instances of noncompliance were identified. The second report is 340
on compliance for each major program and on internal control over compliance required by the Uniform Guidance regulations issued by the OMB. The City had one major program, the Highway Planning and Construction program. In this report, the auditors stated that in their opinion, in all material respects, the City complied with the compliance requirements on each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2021.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
COW Finalized Single Audit Report
341
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Wildomar, California
SINGLE AUDIT REPORT ON
FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS
Year Ended June 30, 2021
342
CITY OF WILDOMAR
SINGLE AUDIT REPORT ON FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS
Year Ended June 30, 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Independent Auditors’ Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards
1 - 2
Independent Auditors’ Report on Compliance for Each Major Program and on Internal Control Over Complianc e Required by the Uniform Guidance
3 - 5
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 6
Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 7
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 8 - 9
Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings 10
343
,QGHSHQGHQW$XGLWRUV¶5HSRUWRQ,QWHUQDO&RQWURO2YHU)LQDQFLDO5HSRUWLQJDQGRQ &RPSOLDQFHDQG2WKHU0DWWHUV%DVHGRQDQ$XGLWRI)LQDQFLDO6WDWHPHQWV 3HUIRUPHGLQ$FFRUGDQFHZLWKGovernment Auditing Standards &LW\&RXQFLO
&LW\RI:LOGRPDU
:LOGRPDU&DOLIRUQLD
:H KDYH DXGLWHG LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH DXGLWLQJ VWDQGDUGV JHQHUDOO\ DFFHSWHG LQ WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV RI $PHULFD DQG WKH VWDQGDUGVDSSOLFDEOHWRILQDQFLDODXGLWVFRQWDLQHGLQGovernment Auditing StandardsLVVXHGE\WKH&RPSWUROOHU*HQHUDORI WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV WKH ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWV RI WKH JRYHUQPHQWDO DFWLYLWLHV WKH GLVFUHWHO\ SUHVHQWHG FRPSRQHQW XQLW HDFK PDMRUIXQGDQGWKHDJJUHJDWHUHPDLQLQJIXQGLQIRUPDWLRQRIWKH&LW\RI:LOGRPDU&DOLIRUQLD WKH³&LW\´
DVRIDQGIRU
WKH\HDUHQGHG-XQHDQGWKHUHODWHGQRWHVWRWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVZKLFKFROOHFWLYHO\FRPSULVHWKH&LW\¶VEDVLF ILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVDQGKDYHLVVXHGRXUUHSRUWWKHUHRQGDWHG-DQXDU\
,QWHUQDO&RQWURO2YHU)LQDQFLDO5HSRUWLQJ
,QSODQQLQJDQGSHUIRUPLQJ RXUDXGLWRIWKHILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWV ZHFRQVLGHUHGWKH&LW\¶VLQWHUQDOFRQWURORYHU ILQDQFLDO UHSRUWLQJ
LQWHUQDO FRQWURO
DV D EDVLV IRU GHVLJQLQJ DXGLW SURFHGXUHV WKDW DUH DSSURSULDWH LQ WKH FLUFXPVWDQFHV IRU WKH SXUSRVH RI H[SUHVVLQJ RXU RSLQLRQV RQ WKH ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWV EXW QRW IRU WKH SXUSRVH RI H[SUHVVLQJ DQ RSLQLRQ RQ WKH HIIHFWLYHQHVVRIWKH&LW\¶VLQWHUQDOFRQWURO$FFRUGLQJO\ZHGRQRWH[SUHVVDQRSLQLRQRQWKHHIIHFWLYHQHVVRIWKH&LW\¶V LQWHUQDOFRQWURO
$deficiency in internal controlH[LVWVZKHQWKHGHVLJQRURSHUDWLRQRIDFRQWUROGRHVQRWDOORZPDQDJHPHQWRUHPSOR\HHV LQ WKH QRUPDO FRXUVH RI SHUIRUPLQJ WKHLU DVVLJQHG IXQFWLRQV WR SUHYHQW RU GHWHFW DQG FRUUHFW PLVVWDWHPHQWV RQ D WLPHO\ EDVLV $material weakness LV D GHILFLHQF\ RU D FRPELQDWLRQ RI GHILFLHQFLHV LQ LQWHUQDO FRQWURO VXFK WKDW WKHUH LV D UHDVRQDEOHSRVVLELOLW\WKDWDPDWHULDOPLVVWDWHPHQWRIWKH&LW\¶VILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVZLOOQRWEHSUHYHQWHGRUGHWHFWHGDQG FRUUHFWHGRQDWLPHO\EDVLV$significant deficiencyLVDGHILFLHQF\RUDFRPELQDWLRQRIGHILFLHQFLHVLQLQWHUQDOFRQWUROWKDW LVOHVVVHYHUHWKDQDPDWHULDOZHDNQHVV\HWLPSRUWDQWHQRXJKWRPHULWDWWHQWLRQE\WKRVHFKDUJHGZLWKJRYHUQDQFH
2XUFRQVLGHUDWLRQRILQWHUQDOFRQWUROZDVIRUWKHOLPLWHGSXUSRVHGHVFULEHGLQWKHILUVWSDUDJUDSKRIWKLVVHFWLRQDQGZDVQRW GHVLJQHGWRLGHQWLI\DOOGHILFLHQFLHVLQLQWHUQDOFRQWUROWKDWPLJKWEHPDWHULDOZHDNQHVVHVRUVLJQLILFDQWGHILFLHQFLHV*LYHQ WKHVHOLPLWDWLRQVGXULQJRXUDXGLW ZHGLG QRWLGHQWLI\DQ\GHILFLHQFLHV LQLQWHUQDOFRQWUROWKDW ZHFRQVLGHUWREH PDWHULDO ZHDNQHVVHV+RZHYHUPDWHULDOZHDNQHVVHVPD\H[LVWWKDWKDYHQRWEHHQLGHQWLILHG
&RPSOLDQFHDQG2WKHU0DWWHUV
$VSDUWRIREWDLQLQJUHDVRQDEOHDVVXUDQFHDERXWZKHWKHUWKH&LW\¶VILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVDUHIUHHRIPDWHULDOPLVVWDWHPHQW ZH SHUIRUPHG WHVWV RI LWV FRPSOLDQFH ZLWK FHUWDLQ SURYLVLRQV RI ODZV UHJXODWLRQV FRQWUDFWV DQG JUDQW DJUHHPHQWV QRQFRPSOLDQFH ZLWK ZKLFK FRXOG KDYH D GLUHFW DQG PDWHULDO HIIHFW RQ WKH ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWV +RZHYHU SURYLGLQJ DQ RSLQLRQRQFRPSOLDQFHZLWKWKRVHSURYLVLRQVZDVQRWDQREMHFWLYHRIRXUDXGLWDQGDFFRUGLQJO\ZHGRQRWH[SUHVVVXFKDQ RSLQLRQ7KHUHVXOWVRIRXUWHVWVGLVFORVHGQRLQVWDQFHVRIQRQFRPSOLDQFHRURWKHUPDWWHUVWKDWDUHUHTXLUHGWREHUHSRUWHG XQGHUGovernment Auditing Standards.
Richard A. Teaman, CPA David M. Ramirez, CPA Javier H. Carrillo, CPA Bryan W͘Daugherty, CPA Joshua :͘Calhoun, CPA 4201 Brockton AveŶƵĞ Suite 100Riverside CA 92501 951.274.9500 d > 951.274.7828 FAX www.trscpas.com
344
3XUSRVHRIWKLV5HSRUW
7KHSXUSRVHRIWKLVUHSRUWLVVROHO\WRGHVFULEHWKHVFRSHRIRXUWHVWLQJRILQWHUQDOFRQWURODQGFRPSOLDQFHDQGWKHUHVXOWVRI WKDWWHVWLQJDQGQRWWRSURYLGHDQRSLQLRQRQWKHHIIHFWLYHQHVVRIWKH&LW\¶VLQWHUQDOFRQWURORURQFRPSOLDQFH7KLVUHSRUWLV DQLQWHJUDOSDUWRIDQDXGLWSHUIRUPHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKGovernment Auditing Standards LQFRQVLGHULQJWKH&LW\¶VLQWHUQDO FRQWURODQGFRPSOLDQFH$FFRUGLQJO\WKLVFRPPXQLFDWLRQLVQRWVXLWDEOHIRUDQ\RWKHUSXUSRVH
5LYHUVLGH&DOLIRUQLD
-DQXDU\
345
,QGHSHQGHQW$XGLWRUV¶5HSRUWRQ&RPSOLDQFHIRU(DFK0DMRU3URJUDPDQGRQ ,QWHUQDO&RQWURO2YHU&RPSOLDQFH5HTXLUHGE\WKH8QLIRUP*XLGDQFH &LW\&RXQFLO
&LW\RI:LOGRPDU
:LOGRPDU&DOLIRUQLD
5HSRUWRQ&RPSOLDQFHIRU(DFK0DMRU)HGHUDO3URJUDP
:H KDYH DXGLWHG WKH &LW\ RI :LOGRPDU &DOLIRUQLD¶V WKH ³&LW\´
FRPSOLDQFH ZLWK WKH W\SHV RI FRPSOLDQFH UHTXLUHPHQWV GHVFULEHG LQ WKHOMB Compliance Supplement WKDW FRXOG KDYH D GLUHFW DQG PDWHULDO HIIHFW RQ HDFK RI WKH &LW\¶V PDMRU IHGHUDOSURJUDPV IRUWKH\HDUHQGHG -XQH 7KH&LW\¶VPDMRUIHGHUDOSURJUDPV DUHLGHQWLILHGLQ WKHVXPPDU\RI
DXGLWRUV
UHVXOWVVHFWLRQRIWKHDFFRPSDQ\LQJVFKHGXOHRIILQGLQJVDQGTXHVWLRQHGFRVWV
Management’s Responsibility
0DQDJHPHQW LV UHVSRQVLEOH IRU FRPSOLDQFH ZLWK IHGHUDO VWDWXHVUHJXODWLRQV DQG WKH WHUPV DQG FRQGLWLRQV RI LWV IHGHUDO DZDUGVDSSOLFDEOHWRLWVIHGHUDOSURJUDPV
Auditor’s Responsibility
2XUUHVSRQVLELOLW\LVWRH[SUHVVDQRSLQLRQRQFRPSOLDQFHIRUHDFKRIWKH&LW\¶VPDMRUIHGHUDOSURJUDPVEDVHGRQRXUDXGLW RI WKH W\SHV RI FRPSOLDQFH UHTXLUHPHQWV UHIHUUHG WR DERYH :HFRQGXFWHG RXU DXGLW RI FRPSOLDQFH LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK DXGLWLQJVWDQGDUGVJHQHUDOO\DFFHSWHGLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVRI$PHULFD WKHVWDQGDUGVDSSOLFDEOHWRILQDQFLDODXGLWVFRQWDLQHG LQGovernment Auditing StandardsLVVXHGE\WKH&RPSWUROOHU*HQHUDORIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV DQGWKHDXGLWUHTXLUHPHQWVRI
7LWOH 86Code of Federal Regulations 3DUW Uniform Administration Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
8QLIRUP*XLGDQFH
7KRVHVWDQGDUGVDQGWKH8QLIRUP*XLGDQFHUHTXLUHWKDWZHSODQ DQG SHUIRUP WKH DXGLW WR REWDLQ UHDVRQDEOH DVVXUDQFH DERXW ZKHWKHU QRQFRPSOLDQFH ZLWK WKH W\SHV RI FRPSOLDQFH UHTXLUHPHQWVUHIHUUHGWRDERYHWKDWFRXOGKDYHDGLUHFWDQGPDWHULDOHIIHFWRQDPDMRUIHGHUDOSURJUDPRFFXUUHG$QDXGLW LQFOXGHV H[DPLQLQJ RQ D WHVW EDVLV HYLGHQFH DERXW WKH &LW\¶VFRPSOLDQFH ZLWK WKRVH UHTXLUHPHQWV DQG SHUIRUPLQJ VXFK RWKHUSURFHGXUHVDVZHFRQVLGHUHGQHFHVVDU\LQWKHFLUFXPVWDQFHV
:H EHOLHYH WKDW RXU DXGLW SURYLGHV D UHDVRQDEOH EDVLV IRU RXU RSLQLRQ RQ FRPSOLDQFH IRU HDFK PDMRU IHGHUDO SURJUDP +RZHYHURXUDXGLWGRHVQRWSURYLGHDOHJDOGHWHUPLQDWLRQRIWKH&LW\¶VFRPSOLDQFH
Opinion on Each Major Federal Program
,Q RXU RSLQLRQ WKH &LW\ RI :LOGRPDU &DOLIRUQLD FRPSOLHG LQD O O P D W H U L D O U H V S H F W V Z L W K W K H W \ S H V R I F R P S O L D Q F H UHTXLUHPHQWVUHIHUUHGWRDERYHWKDWFRXOGKDYHDGLUHFWDQGPDWHULDOHIIHFWRQHDFKRILWVPDMRUIHGHUDOSURJUDPVIRUWKH\HDU HQGHG-XQH
Richard A. Teaman, CPA David M. Ramirez, CPA Javier H. Carrillo, CPA Bryan W͘Daugherty, CPA Joshua :͘Calhoun, CPA 4201 Brockton AveŶƵĞ Suite 100Riverside CA 92501 951.274.9500 d > 951.274.7828 FAX www.trscpas.com
346
4 Report on Internal Control over Compliance
Management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the City’s internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major federal p rogram and to test and repor t on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over compliance.
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performi ng their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal c ontrol over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program t hat is less severe than a mat erial weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in in ternal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify an y deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified.
Report on Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental ac tivities, the discretely presented component unit, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Wildomar, California as of and for the year ended June 30, 2021, and the related notes to the financial statement s, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements. We issued our report thereon dated January 28, 2022, which contained unmodified opinions on those financial statements. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the basic financial statements. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis a s required by the Uniform Guid ance and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of manageme nt and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financia l statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the schedule of expenditures of federal awards is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
347
7KH SXUSRVH RI WKLV UHSRUW RQ LQWHUQDO FRQWURO RYHU FRPSOLDQFHLV VROHO\ WR GHVFULEH WKH VFRSH RI RXU WHVWLQJ RI LQWHUQDO FRQWURORYHUFRPSOLDQFHDQGWKHUHVXOWVRIWKDWWHVWLQJEDVHGRQWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRIWKH8QLIRUP*XLGDQFH$FFRUGLQJO\ WKLVUHSRUWLVQRWVXLWDEOHIRUDQ\RWKHUSXUSRVH
5LYHUVLGH&DOLIRUQLD
$XJXVW H[FHSW IRU WKH 5HSRUW RQ 6FKHGXOH RI ([SHQGLWXUHV RI )HGHUDO $ZDUGV 5HTXLUHG E\ WKH 8QLIRUP *XLGDQFHWRZKLFKWKHGDWHLV-DQXDU\
348
6 CITY OF WILDOMAR
SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS
Year Ended June 30, 2021
T o t a l
Federal Grantor/Pass-Through
Grantor Program Title
Federal
CFDA Number
Grant/Contract
Number
Federal
Expenditures
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Passed through the County of Riverside
Community Development Block Grants 14.218 1.WD.21-18 $ 36, 603
United States Department of Transportation
Passed through the State of California Department
of Transportation
Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 H-08-024 318,313 Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 H-08-025 217,407 Total Highway Planning and Construction 535,720
United States Department of the Treasury
Passed through the State of California
COVID-19 - Coronavirus Relief Fund 21.019 60004-0001 211,9 53
Total Expenditures of Federal Awards $ 784,276
349
7 CITY OF WILDOMAR
NOTES TO THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS Year Ended June 30, 2021
1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES APPLICABLE TO THE
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AWARDS
a) Scope of Presentation
The accompanying schedule pres ents only the expenditures incurred (and related awards received) by the City of
Wildomar that are reimbursable under programs of federal agencies providing financial assistance. For the purpose of this schedule, financial assist ance includes both federal financial assistance received directly from a federal agency, as well as federal funds received indirectly by the City of Wildomar from a non-federal agency or other organization. Only the portion of the program expenditures reimbursable with such federal funds is reported i n the accompanying schedule.
Program expenditures in excess of the maximum federal reimbursement authorized or the portion of the program expenditures that were funded with state, local or other non-federal funds are excluded from the accompanying schedule.
b) Basis of Accounting
The expenditures included in the accompanying schedule were reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Under the accrual b asis of accounting, expenditure s are recognized in the period incurred. Expenditures reported include any property or equipment acquisitions incurred under the federal program.
c) Major Programs
The City had one major program for the year ended June 30, 2021, consisting of expenditures from the United States Department of Transportation. The major program had disbursements of $535,720.
This amount calculates to 68% of t h e t o t a l d i s b u r s e m e n t s f r o m federal awards. The City did not meet the requirements to be a low risk auditee. Therefore, the City’s major programs have to cover at least 40 percent of the total expenditures of federal awards.
d) Indirect Cost Rate
The City has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cos t rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
e) Relationship to Basic Financial Statements
Federal award expenditures agree or can be reconciled with the amounts reported in the City’s financial statements.
350
8 CITY OF WILDOMAR
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
Year Ended June 30, 2021
SECTION I - SUMMARY OF AUDITORS' RESULTS
Financial Statements
Type of Auditors’ Report Issued: Unmodified
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:
Material Weakness(es) Identified?
No
Significant Deficiency(ies) Identified not Considered
to be Material Weaknesses?
No
Noncompliance Material to Financial Statements Noted? No
Federal Awards
Internal Control Over Major Programs:
Material Weakness(es) Identified?
No
Significant Deficiency(ies) Identified not Considered
to be Material Weaknesses?
No
Type of Auditors' Report Issued on Compliance for
Major Programs:
Unmodified
Any Audit Findings Disclosed that are Required to be Reported in Accordance
with 2 CFR Section 200.516(a)
No
Identification of Major Programs:
C F D A N u m b e r s
Name of Federal Program or Cluste r
20.205
U.S. Department of the Transportation; Highway Planning and Construction
Dollar Threshold used to Distinguish Between Type A
and Type B Programs:
$ 750,000
Auditee Qualified as Lo
w-Risk Auditee? No
351
9 CITY OF WILDOMAR
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
Year Ended June 30, 2021
SECTION II - FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS
There were no auditor’s findings required to be reported in accordance with Government Auditing Standards.
SECTION III - FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
There were no auditor’s findings required to be reported in accordance with Uniform Guidance.
352
10 CITY OF WILDOMAR
SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AUDIT FINDINGS
Year Ended June 30, 2021
SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF PRIOR AUDIT FINDINGS
There were no auditor’s findings required to be reported in acc ordance with Uniform Guidance or Government Auditing Standards.
353
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
GENERAL BUSINESS
Agenda Staff Report # 3.1
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
Wildomar Beautification Program Discussion
SUBMITTED BY:
Daniel Torres, Community Services
PREPARED BY:
Daniel Torres, Community Services Director
ACTION:
Provide input and receive and file the conceptual program for the Wildomar Beautification Program.
SUMMARY:
Staff undertook the Wildomar Beautification Program to fulfill multiple requests from Council to provide the Wildomar community with supplemental programs to enhance community engagement and quality of life. Staff met with the ad-hoc subcommittee on four occasions to generate 4 categories of programs. The proposed categories are: Keep it Clean, Light Pole Banners, First Impressions, and Recognitions.
BACKGROUND:
During the February 2021 regular City Council meeting, an ad-hoc subcommittee was developed to guide staff through the conceptual plans of a Wildomar Beautification Program.
The subcommittee, Councilmembers Moore and Morabito, and staff met via zoom to cover the the multiple topic and areas of interest that would be incorporated into a conceptual plan for the program. The Keep it Clean orange bag program had launched several months earlier and presented multiple community opportunities and were noted within the conceptual program.
Upon completion of the planning process, staff would present the program to council.
DISCUSSION:
Each of the four categories have subcategories as additional elements within the program.
The Keep it Clean, Light Pole Banners, First Impressions, and Recognitions categories were developed from the numerous supplemental services requested from both council and the community.
The Keep it Clean Program had originated as a volunteer program where the city provides orange bags to members of the community who are committed to making a difference within 354
Wildomar by cleaning debris from the City Right-of-Way. The subcommittee discussed element such as homeless encampments, 602 Letters, adopt-a-block, right of ways, current developments, community events, pubic services announcements, and partnerships. The subcommittee had narrowed the subcategories should to include Community Events, Community Group Participation, Business Engagement, Trash Containers in the Right of Way, and Program Affiliations.
A Light Pole Banner Program was discussed to honor active military members and veterans.
The subcommittee and staff reviewed the possibility for the future expansion of the category to include City information. Clinton Keith Road was proposed for the placement of the light pole banners.
The third category came to be called the First Impression category. This category and the structuring of the the subcategories had drawn lengthy conversation regarding freeway interchanges, freeway frontage and freeway bridges. There was in-depth discussion regarding art in public spaces with the potential requirements for an additional commission to review and provide recommendation to council regarding art and murals. The subcommittee had came to conclusion to focus in the following subcategories: City Logo Placements, Graffiti Abatement, Street Sweeping, Trees in Right of Way.
The fourth and last category focuses on Recognitions and geared towards developing a program to incorporate the multiple requests from the community to donate, honor and remember individuals. The subcategories include Tree donations, a Brick/Paver program for future city owned developments, Bench Program that aims towards the replacement of park benches, and a Flag Pole plaque program that allows for the remembrance of Fire and Police personnel.
With the conceptual program developed by the subcommittee, Council may provide any additional input and direction staff on the further implementation of the program in its entirety or specific elements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds were approved as part of the Adopted Budget for FY 22/23 in the amount of $5,500.00.
ACCOUNT CODE:
100-410-4610-52115
ATTACHMENTS:
Wildomar Beautification Program - Slides.pdf
355
356
City Council had requested supplemental and enhanced programs to be included to services that are currently provided to the community.
An ad-hoc subcommittee was developed on the February 2021 City Council meeting; consisted of Councilmembers Moore and Morabito.
The subcommittee was tasked to guide staff with through multiple supplemental services outlining components that will be added to the overall Beautification Program. 357
ENGAGE
• Residents
• Teens
• Community Groups
• Businesses
ELEVATE
• Quality of Life
• Wildomar Right of Way
• Name Recognition
358
During the multiple meeting, the subcommittee discussed and review the topics listed below:
• Renewals of 602 Letters
• Encampments
• Clean up Special Events
• Street Sweeping
• Freeway off ramps
• Right of Ways
• City Entry Signs
• Light Poles
• Memorials
• Donations
• Adopt –A – Block
• Partnerships and Affiliations
• Business Developments
• Art in Public Spaces
• Trash Can Programs
• Graffiti Abatement
• Illegal dumping enforcement
• Community Group Partnerships
359
LIGHT POLE
BANNERS
FIRST
IMPRESSIONS
KEEP IT
CLEAN RECOGNITIONS
360
1. The current Keep it Clean Project will be expanded to incorporate the following:
a. Sync volunteer program with Community Clean Up Event. b. Add Special Events such as Plogging (Pick Up while jogging) and Earth Day.
2. City Right of Way trash cans container.
a. Staff to inventory pockets within the right of way.
b. Container to have some type of marking that will make it easily recognized.
3. Expand the Adopt-A-Block program
4. GIS mapping
a. Highlighting area of focus.
b. Community groups can volunteer.
5. Create a volunteer program for Teens; opportunity to fulfill community services hours.
6. Affiliations with local municipalities, regional, and nationally. 361
1. Opportunities for Families to honor their Veterans and Active Military members. a. DD214 Requirement.
b. Military ID
2. Posting will be annually and prior to Veterans Day.
3. Focused areas for display – Clinton Keith Road
4. Sub-committee did discuss the possible expansion of the program:
1. Include City Recognitions – Years of Incorporations, Programs, etc. 362
1. City Distinction
a. Traffic Signal Boxes
b. Stripping on Freeway Exits
c. Welcome Monuments
1. Focus on Clinton Keith
2. Graffiti Abatement
1. Reporting Portal
2. GIS Mapping
3. Yearly Reporting
3. Street Sweeping Program
1. Focus on intersection and main arterials
4. Street Trees
a. Inventory
b. Donation Program
5. Right of Ways Enhancements
a. Freeway Frontage – litter removal
b. Freeway Ramps – Weed Abatements
c. Freeway Bridges
363
1. Trees Donations
a. Create a catalog of species and locations
b. Placed during specified time of year
2. Brick and Pavers
a. Future Program
b. City owned facility
c. Recognize members of the community
3. Benches
a. Replacements for current parks
b. Installments in Trails and Future sites
4. Flagpoles
a. Focused on Fire and Police members
5. Limitations
a. Residents associated
b. Non-Residents Organization
364
FEEDBACK
• Council provide additional suggestions and
direction regarding the program.
• Community to provide input regarding the
categories and levels of interest.
PRIORITIZE
• Segments of program staff should focus on
first this fiscal year.
• Segments to be developed in future fiscal
years.
365
Questions and Comments
Daniel Torres - Community Services Director
[email protected]
951-677-7751 x8212
366
CITY COUNCIL/CEMETERY DISTRICT - REGULAR MEETING
GENERAL BUSINESS
Agenda Staff Report # 3.2
Meeting Date: September 14, 2022
SUBJECT:
Master License Agreement with Riverside County Flood
Control (RCFC) for Public Trail Use within RCFC Facilities SUBMITTED BY:
Jason Farag, Public Works/ Engineering
PREPARED BY:
Jason Farag, Public Works Director
ACTION:
Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Master License Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC).
SUMMARY:
Approval and execution of a Master License Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) to allow for public use of District facilities for trail purposes, and to allow the City to make trail improvements/enhancements.
BACKGROUND:
The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District, RCFC) operates several miles of drainage facilities in the City of Wildomar. District drainage facilities primarily consist of underground storm drains, basins, and above-ground channels. Above- ground channels are typically constructed with adjacent access roads to allow District maintenance vehicles access to maintain the channel.
Under the provisions of a Master License Agreement, the District allows public access across its channel access roads when they are not being actively used for maintenance or for flood control purposes. Prior to City incorporation, the Riverside County Parks Department had an agreement with the District for public access across the District channel access roads. Under that agreement, the County Parks Department was also responsible for trail maintenance along the access roads.
DISCUSSION:
The Riverside County Parks Department no longer provides trail maintenance along District access roads. As a result the District has indicated that the City must enter into a Master License Agreement with the District to continue to allow for public trail use of their channel 367
access roads and to take over the trail maintenance responsibilities. Alternatively, if the City elects not to pursue a separate agreement, the District would restrict public access along their channel access roads in Wildomar.
City staff have worked with District staff to draft a new Master License Agreement (MLA, Attachment A) to allow public access across District facilities. The MLA is a master agreement that covers all District facilities throughout the City and identifies general provisions under which the City may use the District's facilities for pedestrian, bicycle, equestrian, or other forms of public use trails. The MLA identifies, in general, the types of items that the City is permitted to install or construct within the District's facilities including such things as landscaping, gates, signage, surface pavements, railing, striping, etc... The MLA also addresses the level of maintenance the City will be responsible for within District facilities that are used for public access. In general, the City will be responsible for maintenance of items that are related to the public's use of the facility and that are located outside of the top of the channel. The MLA also identifies that a Specific Facility License Exhibit (SFLE) will be developed for each individual facility that is approved for public access. The SFLE will include details regarding any specific work or improvements to be made to a facility/access road, the specific use of the property being permitted, and any other terms that may be required for each facility.
Following approval of the MLA, City staff will work with District staff to prepare an SFLE for those facilities that are currently open for public use, to ensure that they remain open. City staff will also evaluate if there are additional District facilities that are currently not open for public use that can be opened. The SFLEs and any additional recommendations will then be presented to City Council for consideration and approval.
Included in the City's 5-Year Capital Improvement Program is the Wildomar Channel Trail Access Project (CIP 043). This project proposes certain improvements to the various pedestrian access points along the Wildomar Channel. Funds for the Project Development/Environmental, Right-of-Way, and Design/PS&E phases have been budgeted for the current fiscal year. However, construction funds have not yet been identified.
Attachment B includes exhibits showing the District's facilities in Wildomar, existing and proposed multi-use trails from the City's Active Transportation Plan, a sample of an existing District channel with access roads, and a sample of potential improvements that can be made to District access roads under the MLA and an SFLE.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact at this time. Upon approval of individual SFLEs, the City will be required to begin maintenance within the licensed area of the facility identified in each SFLE.
The funding sources proposed
to cover the City's maintenance costs within each facility will be identified at the time that each SFLE is approved.
368
Potential fund sources to cover future trail maintenance within these areas include cannabis revenues and Measure AA. Staff will identify the specific fund source to be used at the time that an SFLE is brought to Council for approval or through the budget update process.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Master License Agreement
B - Exhibits
369
- 1 -
240965
MASTER LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
AND CITY OF WILDOMAR
1. PARTIES AND DATE
This AGREEMENT ("Master License Agreement") is made this day of , 2022 by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic ("LICENSOR" or "DISTRICT"), and the CITY OF WILDOMAR, a municipal corporation ("LICENSEE"). LICENSOR and LICENSEE are sometimes referred to he rein individually as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."
2. RECITALS
2.1 Licensor. LICENSOR operates and maintains certain flood control and drainage facilities principally located in the Wildomar area of western Riverside County, as shown in concept on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof:
(a) Hereinafter called "CHANNELS"; and
(b) Access road adjoining CHANNELS, hereinafter called "ACCESS ROAD"; and
(c) Together, CHANNELS and ACCESS ROAD are hereinafter called "LICENSOR PROPERTY"; and
These facilities are an essential and integral part of LICENSOR's collection and disposal system of flood and surface waters within Wildomar area of western Riverside County and are located within LICENSOR's existing easements and rights of way, as shown in concept on Exhibit "A".
2.2 Licensee. LICENSEE wishes to enter a portion of LICENSOR PROPERTY ("LICENSED PROPERTY") to construct or cause to construct, and subsequently operate, 370
- 2 -
240965
repair and maintain pedestrian, bicycle, equestrian or other forms of public use trails located on LICENSED PROPERTY, as shown in concept on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof. This may include the following: (1) landscape features, (2) gates, (3) signage, (4) asphalt concrete/decomposed granite, (5) re moval of existing channel lining, (6) earthwork, (7) construction of retaining walls, (8) construction of concrete and asphalt concrete pavement, (9) installation of protective railing and (10) striping or other LICENSOR-approved materials for the trails, pedestrian bridge, walkways, irrigation systems, inlets, and other features of the trails. Should any of said trails or LICENSEE's construction, operation, repair and maintenance obligations herein in any way cause or necessitate modifications to LICENSOR's flood control facilities, including CHANNELS and ACCESS ROAD, LICENSEE shall be responsible for performing said modifications ("Modifications") at its sole cost and expense. The plans for said Modifications shall be approved in writing by LICENSOR prior to the commencement of the Modifications, and once completed, the Modifications shall be inspected by LICENSOR and, if satisfied with the condition of the Modifications, LICENSOR shall accept the Modifications in writing.
LICENSEE shall not damage and shall protect LICENSED PROPERTY, including all improvements and the natural resources thereon, at all times at LICENSEE's sole cost and expense, and LICENSEE may not commit or create or suffer to be committed or created any waste, hazardous condition and/or nuisance to occur upon LICENSED PROPERTY.
2.3 Scope of License. This Master License Agreement will serve as a Master Agreement permitting Licensee to construct, operate, repair and maintain public use trails, including pedestrian, bicycle, equestrian or other public use trails, located on LICENSED PROPERTY. A Specific Facility License Exhibit ("SFLE"), the form of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit " C", will be developed for each property subject to this Master Agreement. Each SFLE will (1) describe the specific work 371
- 3 -
240965
to be completed, (2) the use of property to be permitted and (3) other terms that may be required for each location where LICENSEE's facilities are constructed, operated, repaired and maintained. Each SFLE shall be subject to the terms of this Master Agreement and shall become a part hereof upon full execution by Parties. Each SFLE shall be executed by Parties. LICENSEE's City Manager shall be authorized to sign each SFLE on behalf of LICENSEE. LICENSOR's General Manager-Chief Engineer shall be authorized to sign each SFLE on behalf of LICENSOR. No SFLE provisions shall be revised without LICENSOR's written permission, which shall be granted in LICENSOR's sole discretion.
LICENSOR reserves the right to reject any proposal in its sole and absolute discretion, or to request changes thereto prior to acceptance.
2.4 Consideration.
This Master Agreement is made in consideration of the terms, conditions a nd mutua l covena nts containe d here in, the sufficienc y of w hich are hereby acknowledged.
3. TERMS
3.1 Grant. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Master Agreement, LICENSOR hereby grants to LICENSEE, its agents and contractors a revocable, non- exclusive license in, on, over, under and across LICENSED PROPERTY described in each SFLE which is necessary to perform the work and for the use specified in each SFLE ("Facility Project") and to obtain ingress and egress to and upon said LICENSED PROPERTY for the purpose of exercising the rights, privileges and license granted herein.
3.2 Nature of Rights . The permission, rights and privileges granted hereunder are revocable, nonexclusive and nontransferable. The rights granted hereunder in this Master Agreement and in each SFLE are subject to the prior use and property rights of LICENSOR and all other licenses, covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, rights and easements whether of record or not. LICENSEE shall not unreasonably or materially interfere with the 372
- 4 -
240965
use by and operation and activities of LICENSOR on LICENSED PROPERTY. LICENSEE shall not, either voluntarily or by action of law, assign or transfer this Master Agreement or any obligation, right, title or interest assumed by LICENSEE herein without the prior written consent of LICENSOR. Section 3.5 notwithstanding, if LICENSEE makes an assignment or transfer of this Master Agreement, any SFLE or any obligation, right, title or interest herein without prior written consent of LICENSOR, LICENSOR may terminate and revoke the Master Agreement or the applicable SFLE, provided LICENSEE has received ninety (90) days advance notice of termination. In the event of a proper termination of this Master Agreement, all SFLE’s shall terminate. If the assignment is of one or more SFLE(s) only, LICENSOR's rights shall be limited to termination of the applicable SFLE(s).
3.3 LICENSED PROPERTY "As I s". LICENSEE accepts LICENSED PROPERTY in its "as is" condition, with all faults. LICENSEE acknowledges and agrees that LICENSEE is entering LICENSED PROPERTY under this Master Agreement and into each SFLE based on LICENSEE's own investigations and knowl edge of LICENSED PROPERTY and that, except as otherwise specifically stated in this License Agreement and each SFLE, neither LICENSOR nor any agent of LICENSOR, has made any representation or warranty whatsoever, express or implied, with regard to the physical condition of LICENSED PROPERTY or the suitability of LICENSED PROPERTY for any particular purpose or use, including, without limitation, any representations or warranties regarding the applicability or non -applicability of any laws, the soil or su bsoil, surface or subsurface conditions, topography, possible Hazardous Materials contamination, fill, drainage, access to public roads, availability of utilities, existence of underground storage tanks, applicability of or compliance with any Environmental Law or any other matter of any nature whatsoever.
LICENSOR is not responsible for damage to or loss by theft of LICENSEE's property located in, on or under LICENSED PROPERTY.
373
- 5 -
240965
3.4 Use. LICENSEE shall use LICENSED PROPERTY solely for that use described in each SFLE and shall not use it for any other purpose unless approved in writing by LICENSOR. No change shall be made by LICENSEE in the use of LICENSED PROPERTY as described in each SFLE without LICENSOR's prior written approval.
3.5 Term and Termination of License
(a) Term. This Master Agreement shall commence on the date this Master Agreement is fully approved and executed by Parties and continue for so long as LICENSED PROPERTY is used for the permitted purposes unless terminated pursuant to the terms and conditions in Section 3.5(b) herein.
(b) Termination for Cause. LICENSOR reserves the right to immediately terminate this Master Agreement, or any one SFLE granted, and any encroachment permit issued thereto if, for any reason whatsoever, LICENSOR's General Manager-Chief Engineer determines that LICENSEE's or the public's use of LICENSED PROPERTY is not compatible with the primary flood control purpose or function of LICENSOR's facilities.
LICENSOR shall provide notification of such termination in writing and shall specify the effective date thereof.
LICENSOR shall have the right to terminate this Master Agreement, or any one SFLE granted and any encroachment permit issued thereto, and shall have no obligation to reimburse LICENSEE for any of its improvements to LICENSED PROPERTY, under the following circumstances: In the event of a default by LICENSEE of any term or provision of this Master Agreement, which acts of LICENSEE shall include, but not be limited to, the failure by LICENSEE to perform any obligation under this Master Agreement, provided LICENSEE has received written notice of default and LICENSEE has failed to cure the default within ninety (90) days of its receipt of said notice, unless otherwise agreed upon by Parties. In the event that LICENSEE has failed to cure the default as prescribed herein, then 374
- 6 -
240965
LICENSOR shall have the right to immediately terminate this Master Agreement or any applicable SFLE for cause by providing notification of such termination in writing and specifying the effective date thereof.
3.6 Termination for Abandonment. In the event that LICENSEE shall abandon the use of LICENSED PROPERTY or any portion thereof, for the permitted purposes described herein or in the applicable SFLE, the Master Agreement (in the case of abandonment of the entire LICENSED PROPERTY) and the applicable SFLE (in the case of abandonment of a portion of LICENSED PROPERTY) shall expire and terminate upon the expiration of six (6) months following LICENSEE's abandonment of the said property, in which case, LICENSOR shall provide written notice to LICENSEE of termination for abandonment with the effective date of said termination.
3.7 Relocation. In the event that LICENSOR determines in its sole but good faith discretion that it requires LICENSED PROPERTY subject to any SFLE hereunder for a public project ("Required Property"), LICENSOR shall notify LICENSEE of the same, and shall make available to LICENSEE a reasonable relocation area sufficient for relocation of the Facility Project, provided that LICENSOR determines that it has such an area available.
In such case, Parties shall amend or terminate the applicable SFLE to remove the Required Property and shall enter into a new or amended SFLE for the new property onto which the affected Facility Project shall be relocated. If LICENSOR does not have property available for such relocation, notwithstanding any other provision of this Master Agreement, and in addition to its rights set forth in Section 3.5 above, LICENSOR shall have the right to terminate the applicable SFLE. Acquisition of any property and relocation of the Facility Project as described herein shall be at LICENSEE's sole cost and expense.
3.8 Maintenance. LICENSEE shall maintain all features identified as t he Facility Project in the SFLE and all existing surface features within LICENSED PROPERTY, 375
- 7 -
240965
including, but not limited to: (1) fence, railing, side or other protective devices and (2) side slopes or retaining walls if LICENSED PROPERTY adjoins adjacent pro perties at a different grade. Additionally, LICENSEE shall be responsible for the following within LICENSOR PROPERTY: (1) weed abatement, (2) trash removal, (3) graffiti removal, (4) removal of waste generated by public, horses or other sources of that may cause a threat to water quality within LICENSOR PROPERTY and (5) removal of other illegal dumping or nuisance conditions resulting from the public use of LICENSED PROPERTY. LICENSEE shall be responsible to ensure that the public is not allowed to use motorized or high-speed vehicles within LICENSED PROPERTY.
3.9 Repair. LICENSEE shall, at its own cost and subject to the written approval of LICENSOR's General Manager-Chief Engineer or his or her designee repair and maintain the parts of a Facility Project and LICENSED PROPERTY so that they will not at any time be a source of danger to or interference with (a) the present or future roadbed and property of or managed by LICENSOR or (b) any other activities on LICENSED PROPERTY.
Unless otherwise specifically addressed in the terms of an individual SFLE, any repair and maintenance work shall be done to LICENSOR's standards.
3.10 Tests and Inspections. LICENSOR shall have the right at any time to inspect LICENSED PROPERTY and any Facility Project so as to mo nitor compliance with this Master Agreement. If, in LICENSOR's sole judgment, any LICENSEE -caused installation or condition on or LICENSEE's or public's use of LICENSED PROPERTY has been determined by LICENSOR to have an adverse effect on LICENSED PROPERTY (whether or not owned by LICENSOR) or LICENSOR's operations, LICENSOR shall be permitted to conduct any tests or assessments, including, but not limited to, environmental assessments, of, on or about LICENSED PROPERTY and a Facility Project, as it determines to be necessary or useful to evaluate the condition of LICENSED PROPERTY 376
- 8 -
240965
and a Facility Project. LICENSEE shall cooperate with LICENSOR in any tests or inspections deemed necessary by LICENSOR. LICENSEE shall pay or reimburse LICENSOR, as appropriate, for all reasonable costs and expenses incurred due to the tests, inspections or any necessary corrective work and inspections thereafter within thirty (30) days of a request for payment.
3.11 Insurance. LICENSEE, at its sole cost and expense, shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect insurance as required by LICENSOR in the amounts and coverage specified and issued by insurance companies as described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Prior to (i) entering LICENSED PROPERTY or (ii) performing any work or maintenance on the Facility Project, LICENSEE shall furnish LICENSOR with the insurance endorsements and certificates in the form and amounts specified in Exhibit " D", evidencing the existence, amounts and c overage of the insurance required to be maintained hereunder. LICENSOR reserves the right to review and change the amount and type of insurance coverage it requires in connection with this Master Agreement or the work to be performed on the Facility Project. A program of self-insurance shall be an acceptable alternative to satisfy the insurance provisions required under this Master Agreement.
3.12 Indemnity. LICENSEE shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless LICENSOR, its directors, officers, Board of Supervi sors, elected and appointed officials, agents, employees, representatives, independent contractors and subcontractors (collectively "Indemnified Parties") from any liability whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of LICENSEE, its officers, employees, subcontractors, agents or representatives, arising from, related to or in any manner connected with LICENSEE's use and responsibilities in connection therewith of LICENSED PROPERTY or the condition thereof, including, but not limited to, property damage, liens, bodily injury or death , or any other 377
- 9 -
240965
element of any kind or nature whatsoever arising from, related to or in any manner connected with the public use of LICENSED PROPERTY. LICENSEE shall defend, at its sole expense, all costs and fees including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees, cost of investigation, defense and settlements or awards, Indemnified Parties in any claim or legal action based upon such alleged acts or omissions.
With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by LICENSEE, LICENSEE shall, at their sole cost, have the right to use counsel of their own choice and shall have the right to adjust, settle or compromise any such action or claim without the prior consent of LICENSOR; provided, however, that any such adjustment, settlement or compromise in no manner whatsoever limits or circumscribes LICENSEE's indemnification to Indemnified Parties as set forth herein. LICENSEE's obligation hereunder shall be satisfied when LICENSEE has provide d to Indemnified Parties the appropriate form of dismissal relieving Indemnified Parties from any liability for the action or claim involved.
The specified insurance limits required in this Master Agreement shall in no way limit or circumscribe LICENSEE's obligations to indemnify and hold harmless Indemnified Parties herein from third Party claims.
In the event there is conflict between this clause and California Civil Code Section 2782, this clause shall be interpreted to comply with Civil Code 2782. Such interpretation shall not relieve LICENSEE from indemnifying the Indemnified Parties to the fullest extent allowed by law.
This indemnification provision shall survive termination or expiration of this Master Agreement until such a time as the statute of limitations shall run for any claims that may arise out of this Master Agreement.
3.13 Assumption of Risk and Waiver. LICENSEE shall waive any claim against LICENSOR for damages to Facility Project resulting from LICENSOR's customary operation 378
- 10
-
240965
and maintenance activities performed within LICENSED PROPERTY or its appurtenant works, including, but not limited to, any natural calamity, act of God or any cause or conditions beyond the control of LICENSOR, save and except damages resulting from LICENSOR's active negligence or willful misconduct.
3.14 Defense. Parties hereto shall attempt to resolve any disputes amicably at the working level. If that is not successful, the dispute shall be referred to the senior management of Parties. LICENSEE shall proceed diligently with the performance of this Master Agreement pending the resolution of a dispute. Prior to the filing of any legal action related to this Master Agreement, Parties shall be obligated to attend a mediation session with a neutral third -party mediator agreeable to both Parties in the County of Riverside.
Parties shall equally share the cost of mediation.
3.15 Survival of Obligations. All obligations of LICENSEE hereunder not fully performed as of the termination or cessation of this Master Agreement in any manner shall survive the termination of this Master Agreement, including without limitation, each Facility Project, and all obligations concerning the condition of each portion of LICENSED PROPERTY.
3.16 Assignment. This Master Agreement and the license granted herein are personal to LICENSEE. LICENSEE shall not assign or transfer (whether voluntary or involuntary) this Master Agreement in whole or in part, or permit any other person or entity to use the rights or privileges he reby conveyed, without the prior written consent of LICENSOR, which may be withheld in LICENSOR's sole and absolute discretion provided consent shall not be unreasonably delayed, conditioned or withheld. Any assignment made without prior written consent by LICENSOR shall be void and without effect and give LICENSOR the right to immediately terminate this Master Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions in Section 3.2 herein.
379
- 11
-
240965
3.17 Condemnation. In the event all or any portion of LICENSED PROPERTY shall be taken or condemned for public use (including conveyance by deed in lieu of or in settlement of condemnation proceedings), LICENSEE shall receive compensation (if any) only for the taking of and damage to the Facility Project. Any other compensati on or damages arising out of such taking or condemnation awarded to LICENSEE are hereby assigned by LICENSEE to LICENSOR.
3.18 Restoration of LICENSED PROPERTY; Claims for Costs . Upon the termination, revocation or cessation of this Master Agreement or any or all SFLE in any manner provided in this Master Agreement, LICENSEE, upon demand of LICENSOR, and at LICENSEE's own cost and expense, shall abandon the applicable Facility Project(s) and remove it and restore LICENSED PROPERTY to the same condition in which they were prior to the maintenance of the Facility Project thereunder, reasonable wear and tear excepted, unless Parties otherwise agree that removal and restoration is not to be done or not necessary.
In no event shall LICENSEE have any claim against LICENSOR for any of the costs of operating, repairing, maintaining, replacing or removing the Facility Project. In case LICENSEE shall fail to restore LICENSED PROPERTY as aforesaid within one hundred eighty (180) days after the effective date of said termination, revocation, or cessation, LICENSOR may proceed with such work at the expense of LICENSEE or may assume title and ownership of the Facility Project facilities and appurtenances, if any, and any other property of LICENSEE located on LICENSE D PROPERTY. No termination hereof shall release LICENSEE from any liability or obligation hereunder, whether of indemnity or otherwise, resulting from any acts, omissions or events happening prior to the date the Facility Project is removed.
3.19 Notice. Any notice hereunder to be given by one Party to the other Party shall be deemed to be properly served on the date it is deposited in the United States Mail, 380
- 12
-
240965
postage prepaid, addressed as specified below. Either LICENSOR or LICENSEE may change its address for the receipt of notice by giving written notice thereof to the other Party of such change.
TO LICENSOR: TO LICENSEE:
Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District
ATTN: Chief of Operations and
Maintenance Division
1995 Market Street
Riverside, CA 92501
City of Wildomar
ATTN: City Manager
23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 201
Wildomar, CA 92595
3.20 Nondiscrimination. LICENSEE certifies and agrees that all persons employed thereby and any contractors retained thereby with respect to LICENSED PROPERTY and any Facility Project are and shall be treated equally without regard to or because of race, religion, ancestry, national origin, or sex, and in compliance with all federal and state laws prohibiting discrimination in employment, including, but not limited to, the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the Unruh Civil Rights Act; the Cartwright Act; and the California Fair Employment Practices Act.
3.21 Further Acts. LICENSEE agrees, at LICENSEE's sole expense, to perform any further acts, and to execute and deliver in recordable form any documents, which may be reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Master Agreement, incl uding, at LICENSOR's sole discretion, the relocation of any Facility Project and the license granted by this Master Agreement. Any order by LICENSOR for relocation of any Facility Project shall be in accordance with Section 3.6 of this Master Agreement.
3.22 Non-Exclusive License. The license granted by this Master Agreement is not exclusive and LICENSOR specifically reserves the right to grant other licenses within the vicinity of any Facility Project, provided that any such licenses shall not unreasonably interfere with LICENSEE's use of LICENSED PROPERTY.
3.23 Severability. If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Master 381
- 13
-
240965
Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall to any extent be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the terms, covenants, conditions or provisions of this Master Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby.
3.24 Entire Agreement. This Master Agreement, the Exhibits incorporated hereto, and each subsequently executed and incorporated SFLE constitute the entire agreement between LICENSOR and LICENSEE with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior verbal or written agreements and understandings between Parties with respect to the items set forth herein.
3.25 Governing Law and Venue. This Master Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and venue shall be set in the County of Riverside.
3.26 Agreement Signatures . This Master Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute on e and the same instrument. Each Party of this AGREEMENT agrees to the use of electronic signatures, such as digital signatures that meet the requirements of the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ("CUETA") Cal. Civ.
Code §§ 1633.1 to 1633.17), for executing this AGREEMENT. The Parties further agree that the electronic signatures of the Parties included in this AGREEMENT are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as manual signatures.
Electronic signature means an electronic sound, symbol or process attached to or logically associated with an electronic record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the electronic record pursuant to CUETA as amended from time to time. CUETA authorizes use of an electronic signature for transactions and contracts among Parties in California, including a government agency. Digital signature means an electronic identifier, 382
- 14
-
240965
created by computer, intended by the Party using it to have the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature, and shall be reasonably relied upon by the Parties. For purposes of this section, a digital signature is a type of "electronic signature" as defined in subdivision (i) of Section 1633.2 of the Civil Code.
//
//
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES]
383
- 15
-
240965
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parties hereto have executed this Master Agreement on
. (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic
By By
JASON E. UHLEY KAREN SPIEGEL, Chair
General Manager-Chief Engineer Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
COUNTY COUNSEL KECIA R. HARPER
Clerk of the Board
By By
RYAN YABKO Deputy
Deputy County Counsel
(SEAL)
Master License Agreement:
City of Wildomar
06/28/22
AK:blm
384
- 16
-
240965
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: CITY OF WILDOMAR
By
DANIEL A. YORK
City Manager
APPROVAL AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
By By
THOMAS D. JEX JANET MORALES
City Attorney City Clerk
(SEAL)
Master License Agreement:
City of Wildomar
06/28/22
AK:blm
385
386
Wildomar Active Transportation Plan78
ScottRd
MurrietaRd
LakeshoreDr
CorydonRd GrandAve
ClintonKeithRd
Mission Trl
PalomarSt
WashingtonAve
JeffersonAve
JacksonAve
NutmegSt
HancockAve
PrielippRd
California
§¨¦
15 §¨¦215
²
Lake
Elsinore
City of
Lake Elsinore
City of
Menifee
City of
Murrieta
OaksRd
01 0.5 Miles
BundyCanyonRd
LemonSt
Orange St
PalomarSt
MonteVistaDr
HillsRd
Canyon
Cottonwood
CanyonRd
GruwellSt
Salida
Depasquale
Rd
Yamas
Dr
Inland ValleyDr
Malaga
Rd
McVicarSt
DelSol
LaEstrellaSt
WildomarTrail
Wildomar Trail
Wildomar Trail
BaylessRd
Jana Ln
ElizabethLn
Wyman Rd
Gateway Dr
Hidden
Springs Rd
WesleySt
BryantSt
BryantSt UnionSt
Trailwood
Ct
FredrickSt
Cervera
Rd
Catt Rd
Gierson
Ave
Charles
St
CanyonDr
OliveSt
Lakevie wTe r
Grape St
OrangeSt
Waite
St
Selle
rsRd
SusanDr
Elberta
Rd
Prairie
Rd
SunsetAve
RacitiRd
Gaffo
rd
Rd
FredrickSt
T orbett Family
Trail
Justin Hunt
Memorial Trail
Existing Proposed
Multi-Use Trail
Class I - Multi-Use Path
Future
Commercial
Dwy
Navut
Ave
Note:
At the project / design-level when more information is available, modifications to these recommended classifications may be considered by the City.
Bunny
Trl
Stable
Lanes Rd
LostRd
TheFarmRd
BundyCanyonRd
Figure 4-3 Planned Multi-Use Trails
387
240965
EXHIBIT "C"
SAMPLE SPECIFIC FACILITY LICENSE EXHIBIT
[attached on following page]
388
240965
TEMPLATE
Sample Specific Facility License Exhibit No. X: