Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
ALLEY
ALLEY
PUBLIC STREET
637
G. DEFINITIONS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
G. DEFINITIONS
A WNING: An architectural fabric or metal projection that provides weather protection, building identity, or decoration, and is wholly supported by the building to which it is attached. An awning is comprised of a lightweight frame structure over which a cover is attached.
BALUSTRADE: An entire railing system, as along the edge of a balcony, including a top rail, bottom rail and balusters.
BATTERED: Those forms that slope from a true vertical plane from bottom to top, as in the outside surface of a wall.
BOARD AND BATTEN: a form of sheathing for wood frame
buildings consisting of wide boards, usually placed vertically, whose joints are covered by narrow strips of wood over joints or cracks.
BRACKETS: A projection from a vertical surface providing structural or visual support under cornices, balconies, windows, or any other overhanging member.
CLERESTORY: An upper story or row of windows rising above the adjoining parts of the roof, designed to admit increased light into the inner space of the building.
CORNICE: The uppermost division of an entablature; a projecting shelf along the top of a wall supported by a series of brackets; the exterior trim at the meeting of a roof and wall, consisting of soffit, fascia and crown molding.
CORRUGATED PANELS: Panels shaped into folds of parallel and alternating ridges and valleys, either to provide additional strength, or to vary the surface pattern.
DECORATIVE GABLE VENTS: A non-venting louver mounted in the top of the gable.
DECORATIVE JOINERY: Embellishments or ornamental features used for decoration at the juncture of structural elements.
DENTIL: A series of closely spaced ornamental rectangular blocks resembling teeth, used as moldings most often in continuous bands just below the cornice.
DIVIDED LITE: Individual panes of glass held in place by wood or synthetic material to create a pattern.
DORMER: A structure projecting from a sloping roof usually housing a vertical window that is placed in a small gable, or containing a ventilating louver.
DOWNSPOUT: a vertical pipe that carries water from the roof gutters to the ground or cistern.
FANLIGHT: A semicircular window, usually over a door with radiating bars suggesting an open fan.
FRONT-GABLED ROOF: A gabled-roof that faces the road or main entrance.
GABLE: The entire triangular end of a wall, above the level of eaves, the top of which conforms to the slope of the roof which abuts against it, sometimes stepped and sometimes curved in a scroll shape.
GABLE ROOF: A roof having a gable at one or both ends; a roof sloping downward in two opposite directions from a central ridge, so as to form a gable at each end.
638
G. DEFINITIONS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
GOOSENECK LIGHTS: A type of light fixture in which a lamp or lightbulb is attached to a flexible, adjustable shaft to allow the user to position the light source without moving the fixture or item to be illuminated.
HIPPED ROOF: A roof which slopes upward from all four sides of a building, requiring a hip rafter at each corner.
JULIET BALCONY: A pseudo balcony; a low ornamental railing to a window, projecting but slightly beyond the plane of the window, threshold or sill, having the appearance of a balcony when the window is fully open.
KNEE BRACE: A diagonal corner member for bracing the angle between two jointed members; being joined to each other partway along its path serves to stiffen and strengthen the joint.
LINTEL: The horizontal beam that forms the upper structural member of an opening for a window or door and supports part of the structure above it.
MANSARD ROOF: A roof with a steep lower slope and a flatter upper slope on all sides, either of convex or concave shape.
MULLION: A dividing piece between the lights of windows, usually taking on the characteristics of the style of the building.
MUNTIN: A secondary framing member to hold panes in a
window, window wall, or glazed door; an intermediate vertical member that divides panels of a door.
OVERHANGING EA VES: The projecting overhang at the lower edge of a roof that sheds rainwater.
PARAPET: A low protective wall or railing along the edge of a roof, balcony, or similar structure; in an exterior wall, the part entirely above the roof.
PEDIMENTS: A low-pitched triangular gable above the doorway or above a window; a triangular gable end of the rood above the horizontal cornice, often with sculpture.
PILASTER: A partial pier or column, often with a base, shaft and capital, that is embedded in a flat wall and projects slightly; may be constructed as a projection of the wall itself.
QUOIN: One of a series of stones or bricks used to mark or visually reinforce the exterior corners of a building; often through a contrast of size, shape, color or material, which may be imitated in non-load- bearing material.
RAFTER TAILS: The portion of the rafter that hangs over the wall.
REVEAL: The visible side of an opening for a window or doorway between the framework and outer surface of the wall; where the opening is not filled with a door or window, the whole thickness of the wall.
SHUTTER: Each of a pair of hinged panels, often louvered, fixed inside or outside a window that can be closed for security or privacy or to keep out light.
SIDE-GABLED ROOF: A gabled-roof that faces either side of the main entrance.
SILL: The horizontal exterior member at the bottom of a window or door opening, usually sloped away from the bottom of the window or door for drainage of water and overhanging the wall below.
TOWNHOME: An urban building without side yards, containing one residence on one or more floors.
TRELLIS: A structural frame supporting an open latticework or grating constructed of either metal or wood, used to support plants or vines or left exposed.
WINDOW SASH: The moveable part of a window made up of the vertical and horizontal frame that holds the glass.
639
City of Wildomar
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
H. DESIGN STANDARDS CHECKLIST
This Checklist is intended as an overview of the requirements for Multifamily development projects in the City of Wildomar. Additional information and plans may be required to evaluate your application following initial review by staff. A copy of this list will be used to check your application for completeness after it is submitted. Applications not containing the necessary information as shown on this Checklist will not be accepted for review.
To use the checklist correctly, follow the steps below:
Step 1: Review the Site Plan Design Standards (Section F). Site Planning involves a careful analysis of the opportunities and constraints of the site, including existing features such as mature trees, topography, and drainage patterns. The components of site development extend beyond building placement and configuration, including surrounding uses, retaining walls, landscape design, hardscape considerations, and parking. The Site Plan Design Standards outline a number of requirements on these topics.
Step 2: Review the General Building Design Standards (Section E).
While new projects need not copy existing development, their mass and scale should respect adjacent building context. The General Building Design Standards establish requirements on these issues. Standards related to garage doors and entries are also established here. These standards apply no matter which stylistic precedent is being utilized for the project design.
Step 3: Review the Architectural Style Standards (Sections A-D). The design and detailing of buildings is paramount to a quality environment.
Architectural design elements and materials should be consistent throughout the project, recognizing that a building is 3-dimensional and must be well designed on all sides. Detailing, choice of materials, window and door choices should reinforce the overall project design. To provide guidance on architectural detailing, the Standards offer a menu of four architectural traditions individual buildings may be designed in. These styles are: Craftsman, Farm Chic, French, and Colonial Revival.
Within each style description, various elements related to roof forms, windows, decorative details, and other topics are enumerated. The Architectural Style Standards require certain elements, while other elements may be selected from a menu of options. Projects composed of multiple buildings may utilize multiple styles.
As you go through the checklist, check each “Complete” box under “Applicant” to indicate that the information has been provided and sign below once Checklist is complete. If you believe an item is not applicable to your application, check the “N/A” box under “Applicant” and provide justification why the standard does not apply. 640
Design Standards Checklist
Site Design Standards (Section F) Applicant City Use Only Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
Building and Parking (see Sections F.2-F.3)
F.2.1: Do building entries face the primary public street (or on site with multiple buildings, internal open spaces, paseos, or recreation amenities) with pedestrian access provided from sidewalks to all building entries, parking areas, and publicly accessible open spaces? F.2.2: Is at least 60% of the street frontage located between the minimum and maximum front setback lines devoted to buildings? The remaining 40% may be devoted to parking? F.2.3: Are parking areas, covered and uncovered, screened from public street frontages? Screening may be accomplished through building placement, landscaping, fencing, or some combination thereof.
Landscaping for screening purposes shall be no less than four feet tall. Fencing shall comply with the WMC.
F.2.4: If located across the street from a single-family residential zone, are parking lot areas and carports located away from the single-family neighborhood street frontages? F.2.5: Is at least one window from each residential unit located to overlook a landscaped private or common open space area?
F.2.6: If adjacent to a single-family residential zone, are windows, balconies or similar openings oriented so as not to have a direct line-of sight into adjacent units or onto private patios or backyards adjoining the property line? This can be accomplished through: stepbacks of upper stories; window placement; use of clerestory windows, glass block or opaque glass; or mature landscaping within the rear or side setback areas.
F.2.7: Are controlled entrances to parking facilities (gates, doors, etc.) located a minimum of 18 feet from the back of sidewalk, in order to accommodate a minimum of one vehicle entering the facility? F.2.8: Is the residential ground floor facing an arterial roadway elevated at least 21 inches above the finished grade of the sidewalk?
641
Design Standards Checklist
Site Design Standards (Section F) Applicant City Use Only Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
Open Space and Recreation (See Section F.4) Is the proposed project consistent with the following minimum standards for Recreational-Leisure Areas? F.4.1.1: 400 square feet per dwelling unit
F.4.1.2: Minimum Dimensions (in either direction)?
• Private areas:7 feet
• Common areas: 20 feet
• Pedestrian walkway width: 6 feet
• Courtyard internal to a project, or enclosed on at least three sides: 40 feet F.4.1.3: Outdoor recreational-leisure areas may be provided by private areas, common areas, or a combination of both
F.4.1.4: Depending on the number of dwelling units, common outdoor recreational-leisure area shall be provided to the meet the following criteria per dwelling unit:
• Ten (10) to fifty (50) dwelling units: minimum of one (1) space, twenty (20) feet minimum dimension (four hundred square feet total, minimum);
• Fifty-one (51) to one hundred (100) dwelling units: minimum of one (1) space, thirty (30) feet minimum dimension (nine hundred square feet total, minimum); • One hundred one (101) or more dwelling units: minimum of two (2) spaces, forty (40) feet minimum dimension (three thousand two hundred square feet
F.4.1.5: The common recreational-leisure area may be composed of active or passive facilities, and may incorporate any required setback areas other than street setback areas and required landscape setbacks, but shall not include or incorporate any driveways, street side sidewalks, or parking areas, trash pickup or storage areas or utility areas
F.4.1.6: All common RLAs shall be improved as either active (child play areas, pools, recreation facilities, etc.) or passive facilities (gardens, barbeque facilities, seating areas, etc.) with landscaping or hardscape elements designed to serve the residents of the project.
F.4.1.7: All common open spaces shall interface with adjacent buildings via direct connections through doors, windows, and entryways. Any security fencing shall comply with WMC Section 17.172.205.
F.4.1.8: No more than 25 percent of common recreational-leisure area can be in hardscape.
F.4.1.9: All common areas shall be developed and professionally maintained in accordance with approved landscape and irrigation
642
Design Standards Checklist
General Building Design Standards (Section E) Applicant City Use Only Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
Neighborhood Compatibility
E.1.1: Do duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes abutting single-family neighborhoods include individual front doors and interior stairs (when stairs are needed)? Building Design
E.2.1: Do buildings carry the same approach to form and massing, roof design, wall and window design, and materials and colors on all elevations? Decorative accents and details are optional for side and rear elevations.
E.2.2: Are blank walls (facades without doors, windows, landscaping treatments) less than 30 feet in length?
E.2.3: Do buildings over three stories provide a ground floor elevation that is distinctive from the upper stories by providing a material change between the first floor and upper floors along at least 75% of the building façade with frontage upon a street, adjacent public park or public open space? E.2.4: Are trim surrounds provided at all exterior window and door openings? In lieu of exterior window trim, windows can be recessed from wall plane by a minimum of three inches.
E.2.5: Are special architectural treatments (i.e., feature entry location, feature window detail, tower, etc.) provided at street corners and other important focal points? E.2.6: Are front doors oriented towards and visible from the street? E.2.7: Do the front elevations of buildings emphasize entries, porches and other living areas? No garages shall be forward of architecture and no more than 50% of front facing garages shall be located within 20’ of the property line.
Massing / Articulation
E.3.1: Do buildings over three stories tall have major massing breaks at least every 100 feet along any street frontage, adjacent public park, publicly accessible outdoor space, or designated open space, through the use of varying setbacks and/or building entries? Major breaks shall be a minimum of 30 inches deep and four feet wide and extend the full height of the building.
E.3.2: Do the buildings have a minor massing breaks at least every 50 feet along the street frontage, through the use of varying setbacks, building entries and recesses, or structural bays? Minor breaks shall be a minimum of 12 inches deep and four feet wide and extend the full height of the building.
E.3.3: Are rooflines vertically articulated at least every 50 feet along the street frontage, through the use of architectural elements such as parapets, varying cornices, reveals, clerestory windows, and varying roof height and/or form?
643
Design Standards Checklist
Architectural Style Standards - Craftsman (Section A) Applicant City Use Only Yes No Yes No
A.2 Form & Massing – Does the proposed project include the following? Multiple roof planes
Porches or balconies
Design elements that emphasize horizontal orientation
Articulated facades with frequent massing breaks
Low- to moderate-pitched roofs with overhanging eaves
A.3 Roof Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Low- to moderate-pitched gable or hipped roofs (maximum 6:12 slope) Overhanging eaves (minimum 24 inches along primary elevation) with exposed rafter tails or beams Brackets or knee braces at gabled ends
Use of wood or asphalt shingle
A.4 Wall & Window Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Windows have mullion and divided lites
Use of wood shingles or clapboard siding
Utilize wooden trim around windows and doors
Window and door trim color shall contrast with color of walls A.5 Materials & Colors – Does the proposed project include the following? Extensive use of wood and natural materials such as arroyo stone Use of dark, neutral or earth-toned colors
A.6 Decorative Accents & Details – Does the proposed project include at least 3 of the following? Porches with battered, square, double post or 4-post columns of stone or wood Decorative lighting with geometric detailing
Decorated downspouts
Use of moldings or extended lintels to emphasize horizontality Decorative joinery
Trellis
Window boxes
Decorative gable vents
Stained glass accents
644
Design Standards Checklist
Architectural Style Standards - Farm Chic (Section B) Applicant City Use Only Yes No Yes No
B.2 Form & Massing – Does the proposed project include the following? Multi-story with medium- to high- pitched roof forms accentuating vertical orientation Incorporate farm and ranch forms inspired by barns, silos, sheds, tank houses and granary towers Multiple gable roof planes
Covered porches and awnings break up volumes between lower and upper floors B.3 Roof Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Medium to high-pitched (minimum 6:12 slope)
Front and/or side facing gables
Variation in heights and/or planes
Asphalt shingle and metal roofs
B.4 Wall & Window Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Utilize board and batten siding, corrugated panels to give texture and variation to exterior walls Minimal molding around window and door openings
Double hung or casement windows with muntins
Contrast color of window sash with color of the body of the building B.5 Materials & Colors – Does the proposed project include the following? Unadorned materials: metal, wood, masonry
Neutral or muted colors should be predominant
Monochrome accents of doors, windows or architectural features encouraged Stucco shall not exceed 40% of the facade
B.6 Decorative Accents & Details – Does the proposed project include at least 2 of the following? Wall-mounted gooseneck lights
Fixed wood or metal awning without sides
Porches with ceiling fans
Exposed rafter tails and brackets
Dormers
645
Design Standards Checklist
Architectural Style Standards - French (Section C) Applicant City Use Only Yes No Yes No
C.2 Form & Massing – Does the proposed project include the following? Symmetrical organization of compositional elements
Porches and balconies
Prominent roof form
Windows and doors that emphasize vertical orientation
C.3 Roof Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Hipped or Mansard roof with dormers
High-pitched roof (minimum 6:12 slope)
Asphalt shingles
Moderately overhanging eaves (maximum 12 inches)
C.4 Wall & Window Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Vertically-oriented rectangular windows arranged in symmetrical patterns Articulated lintels and sills
Window trim that contrasts with the color of body of the buildin Windows shall be recessed no deeper than 3 inches from outer wall C.5 Materials & Colors – Does the proposed project include the following? Brick, stone or smooth stucco cladding
Off-white and earth tones
White or contrasting trim
Asphalt shingles
C.6 Decorative Accents & Details – Does the proposed project include at least 3 of the following? Quoins at corners; color should contrast with body of the building Entry accents with real or faux stone
Recessed entries
Open terraces, porches and balconies with balustrades or metal railings Horizontal molding accents
Decorative metal light fixtures
Arched windows, dormers or doors
646
Design Standards Checklist
Architectural Style Standards - Colonial Revival (Section D) Applicant City Use Only Yes No Yes No
D.2 Form & Massing – Does the proposed project include the following? Accentuated front entrance
Flat facades
Porches and shallow projects allowed
Side-gabled and front-gabled roof forms
D.3 Roof Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Side-gabled, with added front-gables allowed
Medium to high-pitched roof (minimum 6:12 slope)
Asphalt shingles
D.4 Wall & Window Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Rectangular windows oriented vertically
Windows detailed with arched or flat lintels and sills
Double-hung sashes with muntins
D.5 Materials & Colors – Does the proposed project include the following? Brick cladding, wood or vinyl siding
Attached townhouses shall alternate color and cladding from one unit to the next Off-white and earth tones, muted colors
Asphalt shingles
When shutters are utilized, their color shall contrast with the body of the building D.6 Decorative Accents & Details – Does the proposed project include at least 3 of the following? Front doors with fanlights or sidelights
Front doors accented with pediments and pilasters
Shallow porches with slender columns
Arched windows, dormers or doors
Decorative attic vents
Dentil molding at roofline
Dormers
647
City of Wildomar
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS
Approved by City Council
September 9, 2020
648
CITY COUNCIL CITY STAFF
CONSULTANTPLANNING COMMISSION
Dustin Nigg (Mayor)
Bridgette Moore (Mayor Pro Tem)
Ben J. Benoit
Joseph Morabito
Marsha Swanson
Matthew C. Bassi (Planning Director)
PlaceWorks
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana, CA 92707
Contact: Karen Gulley
John Lloyd (Chairman)
Kim Strong (Vice-Chair)
Eric Filar
Brianna Bernard
Arrin Banks
Special thanks to Wildomar residents for their participation and input.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
649
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. CRAFTSMAN
P. 5 P. 11 P. 23
P. 29 P. 32 P. 37
C. FRENCH D. COLONIAL REVIVAL
E. GENERAL BUILDING
DESIGN STANDARDS
F. SITE DESIGN
STANDARDS
G. DEFINITIONS
B. FARM CHIC
P. 17
City of Wildomar
Multi-Family
Objective Design
Standards Checklist
Attachment A
P. 39
650
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS
PURPOSE
The Multi-Family Residential
Objective Design Standards
are intended to provide
developers, builders, and
architects with a clear
statement of the desired
architectural and site
design characteristics for
new multi-family residential
development in Wildomar
that enhances the area’s unique character and raises the quality of design within the city. Drawn from regional vernacular and contemporary styles, the Craftsman, Farm Chic, French and Colonial Revival descriptions and guidelines included herein are intended to establish a strong, consistent design image and direction that reflects the desires, aspirations and vision of the City of Wildomar.
The standards for the selected architectural styles respond to local architectural precedents, regional climate conditions, and local building practices and materials.
Site Design Standards are outlined to ensure that buildings contribute to creating high-quality neighborhoods and desirable places to live.
OVERVIEW AND APPLICATIONS
The standards are structured to create an easily understandable document using accessible language and imagery to convey architectural and site planning concepts. Precedent images, descriptive text and illustrative diagrams are utilized to communicate the essential features of each style. Within each style, required design elements relating to form and massing, roofs, walls and windows, materials and colors and architectural features are outlined. Additional treatments to heighten visual interest and design integrity are noted as well.
Site Design Standards outline best practices for the placement of buildings, the orientation of building entrances, the design of convenient pedestrian pathways, the use of landscape, and the design of outdoor spaces.
The intent of these standards is to establish a baseline of quality and uniformity to enhance the area’s built environment. The City of Wildomar encourages individual creativity in interpreting how to apply these standards to create unique and exemplary buildings and places. The Planning Director may allow deviations from these design standards on a case by case basis, as approved by the Planning Commission. The deviations shall be limited to design elements related to solar panel installation, wood siding and/or window type.
651
CITY OF WILDOMAR
A. CRAFTSMAN
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
A. CRAFTSMAN
A.1 STYLE DESCRIPTION
The contemporary Craftsman or California Bungalow style is derived from the influential residential style that emerged in the early 20th century out of the Arts and Crafts movement. In Wildomar, this style is deployed to create a visually rich residential environment with allusions to regional history. As indicated in the accompanying precedent images and illustrative diagram, recognizable elements include the artful use of wood and natural materials, low-pitched gabled or hipped roofs, horizontal orientation and earth-toned colors. Common design elements also include exposed rafters and beams under eaves, decorative brackets and fasteners, full- or partial-width porches and large columns or piers. Though this style exhibits a horizontal emphasis, vertical architectural elements are often deployed to accentuate corners and entrances. Period Craftsman residences often featured exterior cladding of wood shingles or clapboard siding and details such as extended lintels and decorative lighting with geometric detailing.
CONTINUOUS MOLDING EMPHASIZES HORIZONTALITY
OVERHANGING EAVES WITH EXPOSED
RAFTER TAILS
WINDOW WITH MULLION AND
DIVIDED LITES
FIGURE A
DECORATIVE LIGHT FIXTURE
PARTIAL-WIDTH PORCH
WOOD 4-POST COLUMN WITH
STONE PIER
WOOD SHINGLES
LOW PITCHED GABLE ROOF
WINDOW BOX
BALCONY
TRELLIS
652
CITY OF WILDOMAR
A. CRAFTSMAN
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
A.2.1 Multiple roof planes
A.2.2 Porches or balconies
A.2.3 Design elements that
emphasize horizontal orientation
A.2.4 Articulated facades with
frequent massing breaks
A.2.5 Low- to moderate-pitched roofs
with overhanging eaves
A.2 FORM & MASSING
653
CITY OF WILDOMAR
A. CRAFTSMAN
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
A.3.1 Low- to moderate-pitched
gable or hipped roofs (maximum
6:12 slope)
A.3.2 Overhanging eaves (minimum
24 inches along primary elevation)
with exposed rafter tails or beams
A.3.3 Brackets or knee braces at
gabled ends
A.3.4 Use of wood or asphalt shingle
A.3 ROOF DESIGNS
654
CITY OF WILDOMAR
A. CRAFTSMAN
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
A.4.1 Windows have mullion and
divided lites
A.4.2 Use of wood shingles or
clapboard siding
A.4.3 Utilize wooden trim around
windows and doors
A.4.4 Window and door trim color
shall contrast with color of walls
A.4 WALLS & WINDOW DESIGNS
655
CITY OF WILDOMAR
A. CRAFTSMAN
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
A.5.1 Extensive use of wood and
natural materials such as arroyo
stone
A.5.2 Use of dark, neutral or earth-
toned colors
A.5 MATERIALS & COLORS
656
CITY OF WILDOMAR
A. CRAFTSMAN
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements (3 or more)
A.6.1 Porches with battered, square,
double post or 4-post columns of
stone or wood
A.6.2 Decorative lighting with
geometric detailing
A.6.3 Decorative downspouts
A.6.4 Use of moldings or extended
lintels to emphasize horizontality
A.6.5 Decorative joinery
A.6.6 Trellis
A.6.7 Window boxes
A.6.8 Decorative gable vents
A.6.9 Stained glass accents
A.6 DECORATIVE ACCENTS & DETAILS
657
B. FARM CHIC
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
B. FARM CHIC
B.1 STYLE DESCRIPTION
Farm Chic, or Modern Farmhouse, is a contemporary interpretation of traditional rural residential forms and materials. This style reflects Wildomar’s agricultural and ranching history and regional context. As indicated in the accompanying precedent images and illustrative diagram, the style utilizes elements such as vertical or horizontal wood siding, monochrome colors with contrasting accents and sparse or simple ornamentation.
Roofs are typically medium to high-pitched. Minimal detailing often includes awnings, porches and wall-mounted gooseneck lights.
FIGURE B
HIGH PITCHED ROOF ACCENTUATED VERTICAL
ORIENTATION
DORMERS
MONOCHROME COLOR WITH
CONTRASTING ACCENTS
HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL
WOOD BOARD AND BATTEN
SIDING
MULTIPLE ROOF PLANES
FIXED AWNING
WITHOUT SIDES
CASEMENT WINDOWS
WITH MUNTINS
658
B. FARM CHIC
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
B.2.1 Multi-story with medium-
to high-pitched roof forms
accentuating vertical orientation
B.2.2 Incorporate farm and ranch
forms inspired by barns, silos, sheds,
tank houses and granary towers
B.2.3 Multiple gable roof planes
B.2.4 Covered porches and awnings
break up volumes between lower
and upper floors
B.2 FORM & MASSING
659
B. FARM CHIC
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
B.3.1 Medium to high-pitched
(minimum 6:12 slope)
B.3.2 Front and/or side facing gables
B.3.3 Variation in heights and/or
planes
B.3.4 Asphalt shingle and metal roofs
B.3 ROOF DESIGNS
660
B. FARM CHIC
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
B.4.1 Utilize board and batten siding,
corrugated panels to give texture
and variation to exterior walls
B.4.2 Minimal molding around
window and door openings
B.4.3 Double hung or casement
windows with muntins
B.4.4 Contrast color of window sash
with color of the body of the building
B.4 WALLS & WINDOW DESIGNS
661
B. FARM CHIC
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
B.5.1 Unadorned materials: metal,
wood, masonry
B.5.2 Neutral or muted colors should
be predominant
B.5.3 Monochrome accents of doors,
windows or architectural features
encouraged
B.5.4 Stucco prohibited
B.5 MATERIALS & COLORS
662
B. FARM CHIC
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements (2 or more)
B.6.1 Wall-mounted gooseneck lights
B.6.2 Fixed wood or metal awning
without sides
B.6.3 Porches with ceiling fans
B.6.4 Exposed rafter tails and
brackets
B.6.5 Dormers
B.6 DECORATIVE ACCENTS & DETAILS
663
C. FRENCH
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
C. FRENCH
C.1 STYLE DESCRIPTION
Residential architecture in the French style draws on that country’s long tradition of domestic building forms. As indicated in the accompanying precedent images and illustrative diagram, multi-family variants of the French style typically display a symmetrical facade dominated by a steeply-pitched hipped or mansard roof with dormers. This variant exhibits formal renaissance detailing, distinguishing it from the asymmetrical varieties that draw on French farmhouse, cottage or chateau precedents.
Brick, stone and stucco cladding are typical. Stylistic details often include segmental arches around doors and windows, quoins at corners, and open terraces, porches and balconies with balustrades or metal railings.
SYMMETRICAL FAÇADE
STEEPLY PITCHED ROOF
WITH SHINGLES
STUCCO AND BRICK CLADDING
STUCCO AND BRICK
CLADDING
RECESSED ENTRYQUOINS AT CORNERS
DECORATIVE METAL LIGHT FIXTURE
TRIM CONTRASTS WITH
CLADDING BALCONY WITH BALUSTRADE
DECORATIVE JULIET
BALCONY
OVERHANGING EAVES
GABLE DORMER
FIGURE C
664
C. FRENCH
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
C.2.1 Symmetrical organization of
compositional elements
C.2.2 Porches and balconies
C.2.3 Prominent roof form
C.2.4 Windows and doors that
emphasize vertical orientation
C.2 FORM & MASSING
665
C. FRENCH
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
C.3.1 Hipped or Mansard roof with
dormers
C.3.2 High-pitched roof (minimum
6:12 slope)
C.3.3 Asphalt shingles
C.3.4 Moderately overhanging eaves
(maximum 12 inches)
C.3 ROOF DESIGNS
666
C. FRENCH
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
C.4.1 Vertically-oriented rectangular
windows arranged in symmetrical
patterns
C.4.2 Articulated lintels and sills
C.4.3 Window trim that contrasts
with the color of body of the building
C.4.4 Windows shall be recessed no
deeper than 3 inches from outer wall
C.4 WALLS & WINDOW DESIGNS
667
C. FRENCH
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
C.5.1 Brick, stone or smooth stucco
cladding
C.5.2 Off-white and earth tones
C.5.3 White or contrasting trim
C.5.4 Asphalt shingles
C.5 MATERIALS & COLORS
668
C. FRENCH
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements (3 or more)
C.6.1 Quoins at corners; color should
contrast with body of the building
C.6.2 Entry accents with real or faux
stone
C.6.3 Recessed entries
C.6.4 Open terraces, porches and
balconies with balustrades or metal
railings
C.6.5 Horizontal moulding accents
C.6.6 Decorative metal light fixtures
C.6.7 Arched windows, dormers or
doors
C.6 DECORATIVE ACCENTS & DETAILS
669
CITY OF WILDOMAR
D. COLONIAL REVIVAL
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
D. COLONIAL REVIVAL
D.1 STYLE DESCRIPTION
The Colonial Revival and New Traditional styles of multi-family housing incorporate elements of American domestic architecture dating back to the early English and Dutch houses built in the first century of colonial settlement. These precedents have been interpreted and re-interpreted during successive waves of residential design and development over the past 140 years, and presently incorporate an eclectic mixture of elements. Common characteristics of new Colonial Revival and New Traditional buildings include materials such as wood and brick; front entrances accentuated with pediments and pilasters; windows with double-hung sashes and articulated lintels and sills; and porches supported by thin columns.
FIGURE D
DECORATIVE ROOF VENT
DENTIL MOLDING
SIDE-GABLED MEDIUM-PITCHED
ROOF WITH ASPHALT SHINGLES
ALTERNATING COLORS
AND MATERIALS
MAIN ENTRY ACCENTUATED WITH
PEDIMENT AND PILASTERS SHALLOW PORCH WITH SLENDER
COLUMNS
FLAT FAÇADE
RECTANGULAR DOUBLE-
HUNG WINDOWS WITH
LINTEL AND SILL DETAIL
SHUTTERS CONTRAST
WITH BODY COLOR
670
CITY OF WILDOMAR
D. COLONIAL REVIVAL
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
D.2.1 Accentuated front entrance
D.2.2 Flat facades
D.2.3 Porches and shallow
projections allowed
D.2.4 Side-gabled and front-gabled
roof forms
D.2 FORM & MASSING
671
CITY OF WILDOMAR
D. COLONIAL REVIVAL
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
D.3.1 Side-gabled, with added front-
gables allowed
D.3.2 Medium to High-pitched roof
(minimum 6:12 slope)
D.3.3 Asphalt shingles
D.3 ROOF DESIGNS
672
CITY OF WILDOMAR
D. COLONIAL REVIVAL
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
D.4.1 Rectangular windows oriented
vertically
D.4.2 Windows detailed with arched
or flat lintels and sills
D.4.3 Double-hung sashes with
muntins
D.4 WALLS & WINDOW DESIGNS
673
CITY OF WILDOMAR
D. COLONIAL REVIVAL
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements
D.5.1 Brick cladding, wood or vinyl
siding
D.5.2 Attached townhomes shall
alternate color and cladding from
one unit to the next
D.5.3 Off-white and earth tones,
muted colors
D.5.4 Asphalt shingles
D.5.5 When shutters are utilized, their
color shall contrast with the body of
the building
D.5 MATERIALS & COLORS
674
CITY OF WILDOMAR
D. COLONIAL REVIVAL
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
Required Elements (3 or more)
D.6.1 Front doors with fanlights or
sidelights
D.6.2 Front doors accented with
pediments and pilasters
D.6.3 Shallow porches with slender
columns
D.6.4 Arched windows, dormers or
doors
D.6.5 Decorative attic vents
D.6.6 Dentil molding at roofline
D.6.7 Dormers
D.6 DECORATIVE ACCENTS & DETAILS
675
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
E. General Building Design Standards
E.1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY
E.1.1 Duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes abutting
single-family neighborhoods shall include
individual front doors and interior stairs (when
stairs are needed).
This section describes the general building design standards that are intended to ensure a minimum standard of design and construction quality in the development of new multi-family residential projects in Wildomar. These standards apply no matter which stylistic precedent is being utilized for the project design. They are intended to work in concert with the standards for multi-family residential buildings described in the City’s zoning code. If there is any conflict between the two, the zoning standards shall take precedence.
E. GENERAL BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS
E.2 BUILDING DESIGN
E.2.1 Buildings shall carry the same approach
to form and massing, roof design, wall and
window design, and materials and colors on
all elevations. Decorative accents and details
are optional for side and rear elevations.
E.2.2 Blank walls (facades without doors,
windows, landscaping treatments) shall be
less than 30 feet in length.
NOT Recommended: Building has different form and
elements that cause loss of unity.
NOT Recommended: Building has a long blank or plain
facade.
676
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
E. General Building Design Standards
E.2.3 Buildings over three stories must
provide a ground floor elevation that
is distinctive from the upper stories by
providing a material change between the
first floor and upper floors along at least 75%
of the building façade with frontage upon a
street, adjacent public park or public open
space.
E.2.4 Trim surrounds shall be provided at all
exterior window and door openings. In lieu
of exterior window trim, windows can be
recessed from wall plane by a minimum of
three inches.
E.2.5 Special architectural treatments (i.e.,
feature entry location, feature window
detail, tower, etc.) shall be provided at street
corners and other important focal points.
E. GENERAL BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS
(CONT.)
Recommended: Buildings over three stories must provide a ground floor elevation that is distinctive from the upper stories.
Recommended: Trim shall be provided
at all exterior window and door
openings
Recommended: Special architectural
treatments shall be provided at street
corners.
MIN 3”
RECESS
WINDOW
HAS TRIMS
677
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
E. General Building Design Standards
E. GENERAL BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS
(CONT.)
Recommended: Front doors shall
orient towards and be visible from
the street.
Recommended: Parking in on
the back of the building.
Recommended: Building articulation helps to break up building mass and add visual interest
NOT Recommended: Parking is
visible from the street.
E.2.6 Front doors shall orient towards and be visible
from the street.
E.2.7 Building front elevations shall emphasize
entries, porches and other living areas. No garages
shall be forward of architecture and no more than
50% of front facing garages shall be located within
20’ of the property line.
E.3 MASSING/ARTICULATION
E.3.1 Buildings over three stories tall shall have
major massing breaks at least every 100 feet along
any street frontage, adjacent public park, publicly
accessible outdoor space, or designated open space,
through the use of varying setbacks and/or building
entries. Major breaks shall be a minimum of 30
inches deep and four feet wide and extend the full
height of the building.
E.3.2 Buildings shall have minor massing breaks
at least every 50 feet along the street frontage,
through the use of varying setbacks, building entries
and recesses, or structural bays. Minor breaks shall
be a minimum of 12 inches deep and four feet wide
and extend the full height of the building.
E.3.3 Rooflines shall be vertically articulated at least every 50 feet along the street frontage, through
the use of architectural elements such as parapets,
varying cornices, reveals, clerestory windows, and
varying roof height and/or form.
678
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPINGBUILDING AND PARKING
F. SITE DESIGN STANDARDS
F.1 OVERVIEW
The design of a project on the site is as important as the design of the building itself. The placement of buildings and pedestrian connectivity to open spaces affect quality of life as much as landscape, building shape, and materials. People live both in and around buildings so the outside living space should be as well designed as the inside.
These site design standards should be used in conjunction with the zoning standards found in the Wildomar Municipal Code.
F. SITE DESIGN STANDARDS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
F.2.1 Building entries shall face the primary public
street with pedestrian access provided from
sidewalks to all building entries, parking areas,
and publicly accessible open spaces. For larger
sites with multiple buildings, building entries may
also be oriented to face internal open spaces,
paseos, and recreation amenities.
F.2.2 A minimum of 60% of the street frontage
shall be devoted to buildings located between
the minimum and maximum front setback lines.
The remaining 40% may be devoted to parking.
F.2.3 Parking areas, covered and uncovered,
shall be screened from public street frontages.
Screening may be accomplished through
building placement, landscaping, fencing, or
some combination thereof. Landscaping for
screening purposes shall be no less than four feet
tall. Fencing shall comply with the WMC.
F.2.4 For multifamily projects located across
the street from a single-family residential zone,
parking lot areas and carports shall not be located
along the single-family neighborhood street
frontages.
F.2 BUILDING AND PARKING
Building entries face
common open space
or paseos
Building entries face
public street
A minimum of 60% of
the street frontage shall
be devoted to buildings
680
F. SITE DESIGN STANDARDS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
F.3 BUILDING AND PARKING
Building have views to the open space.
Ground floor shall be elevated
from the street to protect
pravicy.
Parking shall be screened from
public street frontages.MIN. 21”
F.2.5 A minimum of one window from each
residential unit shall be located to overlook a
landscaped private or common open space
area.
F.2.6 If adjacent to a single-family residential
zone, windows, balconies or similar openings
shall be oriented so as not to have a direct
line-of-sight into adjacent units or onto private
patios or backyards adjoining the property line.
This can be accomplished through: stepbacks
of upper stories; window placement; use of
clerestory windows, glass block or opaque
glass; or mature landscaping within the rear or
side setback areas.
F.2.7 Controlled entrances to parking facilities
(gates, doors, etc.) shall be located a minimum
of 18 feet from the back of sidewalk, in order
to accommodate a minimum of one vehicle
entering the facility.
F.2.8 Ground floor residential fronting or siding
onto an arterial roadway shall be elevated at
least 21 inches above the finished grade of the
sidewalk.
681
F. SITE DESIGN STANDARDS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
F.4.1 Minimum Requirements for Recreational-Leisure Areas (RLA):
F.4.1.1 400 square feet per dwelling unit
F.4.1.2 Minimum Dimensions (in either direction)
○ Pr
ivate areas:7 feet
○ Common ar
eas: 20 feet
○ Pedestr
ian walkway width: 6 feet
○ Cour
tyard internal to a project, or enclosed on at least three sides:
40 feet
F.4.1.3 Outdoor recreational-leisure areas may be provided by private areas, common areas, or a combination of both.
F.4.1.4 Depending on the number of dwelling units, common outdoor recreational-leisure area shall be provided to the meet the following criteria per dwelling unit:
○ Ten (10) t
o fifty (50) dwelling units: minimum of one (1) space,
twenty (20) feet minimum dimension (four hundred square feet total, minimum);
○ Fif
ty-one (51) to one hundred (100) dwelling units: minimum of one (1) space, thirty (30) feet minimum dimension (nine hundred square feet total, minimum);
○ One hundred one (101) or mor
e dwelling units: minimum of two
(2) spaces, forty (40) feet minimum dimension (three thousand two hundred square feet total).
F.4 OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
F.4.1.5 The common recreational-leisure area may be composed of active or passive facilities, and may incorporate any required setback areas other than street setback areas and required landscape setbacks, but shall not include or incorporate any driveways, street side sidewalks, or parking areas, trash pickup or storage areas or utility areas.
F.4.1.6 All common RLAs shall be improved as either active (child play areas, pools, recreation facilities, etc.) or passive facilities (gardens, barbeque facilities, seating areas, etc.) with landscaping or hardscape elements designed to serve the residents of the project.
F.4.1.7 All common open spaces shall interface with adjacent buildings via direct connections through doors, windows, and entryways. Any security fencing shall comply with WMC Section 17.172.205.
F.4.1.8 No more than 25 percent of common recreational-leisure area can be in hardscape.
F.4.1.9 All common areas shall be developed and professionally maintained in accordance with approved landscape and irrigation plans.
682
F. SITE DESIGN STANDARDS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
ALLEY
ALLEY
PUBLIC STREET
683
G. DEFINITIONS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
G. DEFINITIONS
A WNING: An architectural fabric or metal projection that provides weather protection, building identity, or decoration, and is wholly supported by the building to which it is attached. An awning is comprised of a lightweight frame structure over which a cover is attached.
BALUSTRADE: An entire railing system, as along the edge of a balcony, including a top rail, bottom rail and balusters.
BATTERED: Those forms that slope from a true vertical plane from bottom to top, as in the outside surface of a wall.
BOARD AND BATTEN: a form of sheathing for wood frame
buildings consisting of wide boards, usually placed vertically, whose joints are covered by narrow strips of wood over joints or cracks.
BRACKETS: A projection from a vertical surface providing structural or visual support under cornices, balconies, windows, or any other overhanging member.
CLERESTORY: An upper story or row of windows rising above the adjoining parts of the roof, designed to admit increased light into the inner space of the building.
CORNICE: The uppermost division of an entablature; a projecting shelf along the top of a wall supported by a series of brackets; the exterior trim at the meeting of a roof and wall, consisting of soffit, fascia and crown molding.
CORRUGATED PANELS: Panels shaped into folds of parallel and alternating ridges and valleys, either to provide additional strength, or to vary the surface pattern.
DECORATIVE GABLE VENTS: A non-venting louver mounted in the top of the gable.
DECORATIVE JOINERY: Embellishments or ornamental features used for decoration at the juncture of structural elements.
DENTIL: A series of closely spaced ornamental rectangular blocks resembling teeth, used as moldings most often in continuous bands just below the cornice.
DIVIDED LITE: Individual panes of glass held in place by wood or synthetic material to create a pattern.
DORMER: A structure projecting from a sloping roof usually housing a vertical window that is placed in a small gable, or containing a ventilating louver.
DOWNSPOUT: a vertical pipe that carries water from the roof gutters to the ground or cistern.
FANLIGHT: A semicircular window, usually over a door with radiating bars suggesting an open fan.
FRONT-GABLED ROOF: A gabled-roof that faces the road or main entrance.
GABLE: The entire triangular end of a wall, above the level of eaves, the top of which conforms to the slope of the roof which abuts against it, sometimes stepped and sometimes curved in a scroll shape.
GABLE ROOF: A roof having a gable at one or both ends; a roof sloping downward in two opposite directions from a central ridge, so as to form a gable at each end.
684
G. DEFINITIONS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Multi-Family Residential Objective Design Standards
GOOSENECK LIGHTS: A type of light fixture in which a lamp or lightbulb is attached to a flexible, adjustable shaft to allow the user to position the light source without moving the fixture or item to be illuminated.
HIPPED ROOF: A roof which slopes upward from all four sides of a building, requiring a hip rafter at each corner.
JULIET BALCONY: A pseudo balcony; a low ornamental railing to a window, projecting but slightly beyond the plane of the window, threshold or sill, having the appearance of a balcony when the window is fully open.
KNEE BRACE: A diagonal corner member for bracing the angle between two jointed members; being joined to each other partway along its path serves to stiffen and strengthen the joint.
LINTEL: The horizontal beam that forms the upper structural member of an opening for a window or door and supports part of the structure above it.
MANSARD ROOF: A roof with a steep lower slope and a flatter upper slope on all sides, either of convex or concave shape.
MULLION: A dividing piece between the lights of windows, usually taking on the characteristics of the style of the building.
MUNTIN: A secondary framing member to hold panes in a
window, window wall, or glazed door; an intermediate vertical member that divides panels of a door.
OVERHANGING EA VES: The projecting overhang at the lower edge of a roof that sheds rainwater.
PARAPET: A low protective wall or railing along the edge of a roof, balcony, or similar structure; in an exterior wall, the part entirely above the roof.
PEDIMENTS: A low-pitched triangular gable above the doorway or above a window; a triangular gable end of the rood above the horizontal cornice, often with sculpture.
PILASTER: A partial pier or column, often with a base, shaft and capital, that is embedded in a flat wall and projects slightly; may be constructed as a projection of the wall itself.
QUOIN: One of a series of stones or bricks used to mark or visually reinforce the exterior corners of a building; often through a contrast of size, shape, color or material, which may be imitated in non-load- bearing material.
RAFTER TAILS: The portion of the rafter that hangs over the wall.
REVEAL: The visible side of an opening for a window or doorway between the framework and outer surface of the wall; where the opening is not filled with a door or window, the whole thickness of the wall.
SHUTTER: Each of a pair of hinged panels, often louvered, fixed inside or outside a window that can be closed for security or privacy or to keep out light.
SIDE-GABLED ROOF: A gabled-roof that faces either side of the main entrance.
SILL: The horizontal exterior member at the bottom of a window or door opening, usually sloped away from the bottom of the window or door for drainage of water and overhanging the wall below.
TOWNHOME: An urban building without side yards, containing one residence on one or more floors.
TRELLIS: A structural frame supporting an open latticework or grating constructed of either metal or wood, used to support plants or vines or left exposed.
WINDOW SASH: The moveable part of a window made up of the vertical and horizontal frame that holds the glass.
685
1 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
City of Wildomar Multi-Family Objective Design Standards Checklist The
Wildomar Multi-Family Development Standards are a manual for developers and builders, architects and designers, and City staff involved in review and approval of multi-family development. We suggest the following steps as a quick way to understand the different sections of the standards and how best to determine compliance with the Standards.
Step 1: Review the Site Plan Design Standards (Section F). Site Planning involves a careful analysis of the opportunities and constraints of the site, including existing features such as mature trees, topography, and drainage patterns. The components of site development extend beyond building placement and configuration, including surrounding uses, retaining walls, landscape design, hardscape considerations, and parking. The Site Plan Design Standards outline a number of requirements on these topics.
Ste
p 2: Review the General Building Design Standards (Section E). While new projects need not copy existing development, their mass and scale should respect adjacent building context. The General Building Design Standards establish requirements on these issues. Standards related to garage doors and entries are also established here. These standards apply no matter which stylistic precedent is being utilized for the project design.
Step 3: Review the Architectural Style Standards (Sections A-D). The design and detailing of buildings is paramount to a quality environment. Architectural design elements and materials should be consistent throughout the project, recognizing that a building is 3-dimensional and must be well designed on all sides. Detailing, choice of materials, window and door choices should reinforce the overall project design. To provide guidance on architectural detailing, the Standards offer a menu of four architectural traditions individual buildings may be designed in. These styles are: Craftsman, Farm Chic, French, and Colonial Revival. Within each style description, various elements related to roof forms, windows, decorative details, and other topics are enumerated. The Architectural Style Standards require certain elements, while other elements may be selected from a menu of options. Projects composed of multiple buildings may utilize multiple styles.
ATTACHMENT A
686
2 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
Site Design Standards – Building and Parking (see Sections F.2-F.3)
Is the proposed project consistent with the following standards? If the answer is “no” to any of these questions, then the proposed project is inconsistent with the design standards.
F.2.1: Do building entries face the primary public street (or on site with multiple buildings, internal open spaces, paseos, or recreation amenities) with pedestrian access provided from sidewalks to all building entries, parking areas, and publicly accessible open spaces? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
F.2.2: Is at least 60% of the street frontage located between the minimum and maximum front setback lines devoted to buildings? The remaining 40% may be devoted to parking. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
F.2.3: Are parking areas, covered and uncovered, screened from public street frontages? Screening may be accomplished through building placement, landscaping, fencing, or some combination thereof.
Landscaping for screening purposes shall be no less than four feet tall. Fencing shall comply with the WMC. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
F.2.4: If located across the street from a single-family residential zone, are parking lot areas and carports located away from the single-family neighborhood street frontages? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
F.2.5: Is at least one window from each residential unit located to overlook a landscaped private or common open space area? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
F.2.6: If adjacent to a single-family residential zone, are windows, balconies or similar openings oriented so as not to have a direct line-of sight into adjacent units or onto private patios or backyards adjoining the property line? This can be accomplished through: stepbacks of upper stories; window placement; 687
3 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
use of clerestory windows, glass block or opaque glass; or mature landscaping within the rear or side setback areas. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
F.2.7: Are controlled entrances to parking facilities (gates, doors, etc.) located a minimum of 18 feet from the back of sidewalk, in order to accommodate a minimum of one vehicle entering the facility? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
F.2.8: Is the residential ground floor facing an arterial roadway elevated at least 21 inches above the finished grade of the sidewalk? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
Site Design Standards – Open Space and Recreation (see Section F.4)
Is the proposed project consistent with the following minimum standards for Recreational-Leisure Areas? If the answer is “no” to any of these questions, then the proposed project is inconsistent with the design standards.
F.4.1.1: 400 square feet per dwelling unit ☐ Yes ☐ No
F.4.1.2: Minimum Dimensions (in either direction) ☐ Yes ☐ No • Private areas:7 feet
• Common areas: 20 feet
• Pedestrian walkway width: 6 feet
• Courtyard internal to a project, or enclosed on at least three sides: 40 feet 688
4 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
F.4.1.3: Outdoor recreational-leisure areas may be provided by private areas, common areas, or a combination of both. ☐ Yes ☐ No
F.4.1.4: Depending on the number of dwelling units, common outdoor recreational-leisure area shall be provided to the meet the following criteria per dwelling unit: ☐ Yes ☐ No • Ten (10) to fifty (50) dwelling units: minimum of one (1) space, twenty (20) feet minimum dimension (four hundred square feet total, minimum);
• Fifty-one (51) to one hundred (100) dwelling units: minimum of one (1) space, thirty (30) feet minimum dimension (nine hundred square feet total, minimum); • One hundred one (101) or more dwelling units: minimum of two (2) spaces, forty (40) feet minimum dimension (three thousand two hundred square feet
F.4.1.5: The common recreational-leisure area may be composed of active or passive facilities, and may incorporate any required setback areas other than street setback areas and required landscape setbacks, but shall not include or incorporate any driveways, street side sidewalks, or parking areas, trash pickup or storage areas or utility areas. ☐ Yes ☐ No
F.4.1.6: All common RLAs shall be improved as either active (child play areas, pools, recreation facilities, etc.) or passive facilities (gardens, barbeque facilities, seating areas, etc.) with landscaping or hardscape elements designed to serve the residents of the project. ☐ Yes ☐ No
F.4.1.7: All common open spaces shall interface with adjacent buildings via direct connections through doors, windows, and entryways. Any security fencing shall comply with WMC Section 17.172.205. ☐ Yes ☐ No
F.4.1.8: No more than 25 percent of common recreational-leisure area can be in hardscape. ☐ Yes ☐ No
F.4.1.9: All common areas shall be developed and professionally maintained in accordance with approved landscape and irrigation. ☐ Yes ☐ No
689
5 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
General Building Design Standards – (see Section E)
Is the proposed project consistent with the following standards? If the answer is “no” to any of these questions, then the proposed project is inconsistent with the design standards.
Neighborhood Compatibility
E.1.1: Do duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes abutting single-family neighborhoods include individual front doors and interior stairs (when stairs are needed)? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
Building Design
E.2.1: Do buildings carry the same approach to form and massing, roof design, wall and window design, and materials and colors on all elevations? Decorative accents and details are optional for side and rear elevations. ☐ Yes ☐ No
E.2.2: Are blank walls (facades without doors, windows, landscaping treatments) less than 30 feet in length? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
E.2.3: Do buildings over three stories provide a ground floor elevation that is distinctive from the upper stories by providing a material change between the first floor and upper floors along at least 75% of the building façade with frontage upon a street, adjacent public park or public open space? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
E.2.4: Are trim surrounds provided at all exterior window and door openings? In lieu of exterior window trim, windows can be recessed from wall plane by a minimum of three inches. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐
E.2.5: Are special architectural treatments (i.e., feature entry location, feature window detail, tower, etc.) provided at street corners and other important focal points? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
E.2.6: Are front doors oriented towards and visible from the street? ☐ Yes ☐ No
E.2.7: Do the front elevations of buildings emphasize entries, porches and other living areas? No garages shall be forward of architecture and no more than 50% of front facing garages shall be located within 20’ of the property line. ☐ Yes ☐ No
690
6 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
Massing/Articulation
E.3.1: Do buildings over three stories tall have major massing breaks at least every 100 feet along any street frontage, adjacent public park, publicly accessible outdoor space, or designated open space, through the use of varying setbacks and/or building entries? Major breaks shall be a minimum of 30 inches deep and four feet wide and extend the full height of the building. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
E.3.2: Do the buildings have a minor massing breaks at least every 50 feet along the street frontage, through the use of varying setbacks, building entries and recesses, or structural bays? Minor breaks shall be a minimum of 12 inches deep and four feet wide and extend the full height of the building. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
E.3.3: Are rooflines vertically articulated at least every 50 feet along the street frontage, through the use of architectural elements such as parapets, varying cornices, reveals, clerestory windows, and varying roof height and/or form? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
691
7 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
Craftsman Style (see Section A)
Is the proposed project consistent with the following standards? If the answer is “no”, then the proposed project is inconsistent with the design standards.
A.2 Form & Massing – Does the proposed project include the following? Multiple roof planes ☐ Yes ☐ No
Porches or balconies ☐ Yes ☐ No
Design elements that emphasize horizontal orientation ☐ Yes ☐ No Articulated facades with frequent massing breaks ☐ Yes ☐ No Low- to moderate-pitched roofs with overhanging eaves ☐ Yes ☐ No A.3 Roof Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Low- to moderate-pitched gable or hipped roofs (maximum 6:12 slope) ☐ Yes ☐ No Overhanging eaves (minimum 24 inches along primary elevation) with exposed rafter tails or beams ☐ Yes ☐ No
692
8 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
Brackets or knee braces at gabled ends ☐ Yes ☐ No
Use of wood or asphalt shingle ☐ Yes ☐ No
A.4 Wall & Window Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Windows have mullion and divided lites ☐ Yes ☐ No
Use of wood shingles or clapboard siding ☐ Yes ☐ No
Utilize wooden trim around windows and doors ☐ Yes ☐ No Window and door trim color shall contrast with color of walls ☐ Yes ☐ No A.5 Materials & Colors – Does the proposed project include the following? Extensive use of wood and natural materials such as arroyo stone ☐ Yes ☐ No Use of dark, neutral or earth-toned colors ☐ Yes ☐ No A.6 Decorative Accents & Details – Does the proposed project include at least 3 of the following? Porches with battered, square, double post or 4-post columns of stone or wood ☐ Yes ☐ No Decorative lighting with geometric detailing ☐ Yes ☐ No Decorated downspouts ☐ Yes ☐ No
Use of moldings or extended lintels to emphasize horizontality ☐ Yes ☐ No Decorative joinery ☐ Yes ☐ No
Trellis ☐ Yes ☐ No
Window boxes ☐ Yes ☐ No
Decorative gable vents ☐ Yes ☐ No
Stained glass accents ☐ Yes ☐ No
693
9 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
Farm Chic Style (see Section B)
Is the proposed project consistent with the following standards? If the answer is “no”, then the proposed project is inconsistent with the design standards.
B.2 Form & Massing – Does the proposed project include the following? Multi-story with medium- to high- pitched roof forms accentuating vertical orientation ☐ Yes ☐ No
Incorporate farm and ranch forms inspired by barns, silos, sheds, tank houses and granary towers ☐ Yes ☐ No
Multiple gable roof planes ☐ Yes ☐ No
Covered porches and awnings break up volumes between lower and upper floors ☐ Yes ☐ No B.3 Roof Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Medium to high-pitched (minimum 6:12 slope) ☐ Yes ☐ No Front and/or side facing gables ☐ Yes ☐ No
Variation in heights and/or planes ☐ Yes ☐ No
694
10 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
Asphalt shingle and metal roofs ☐ Yes ☐ No
B.4 Wall & Window Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Utilize board and batten siding, corrugated panels to give texture and variation to exterior walls ☐ Yes ☐ No
Minimal molding around window and door openings ☐ Yes ☐ No Double hung or casement windows with muntins ☐ Yes ☐ No Contrast color of window sash with color of the body of the building ☐ Yes ☐ No B.5 Materials & Colors – Does the proposed project include the following? Unadorned materials: metal, wood, masonry ☐ Yes ☐ No Neutral or muted colors should be predominant ☐ Yes ☐ No Monochrome accents of doors, windows or architectural features encouraged ☐ Yes ☐ No Stucco prohibited ☐ Yes ☐ No
B.6 Decorative Accents & Details – Does the proposed project include at least 2of the following? Wall-mounted gooseneck lights ☐ Yes ☐ No
Fixed wood or metal awning without sides ☐ Yes ☐ No Porches with ceiling fans ☐ Yes ☐ No
Exposed rafter tails and brackets ☐ Yes ☐ No
Dormers ☐ Yes ☐ No
695
11 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
French Style (see Section C)
Is the proposed project consistent with the following standards? If the answer is “no”, then the proposed project is inconsistent with the design standards.
C.2 Form & Massing – Does the proposed project include the following? Symmetrical organization of compositional elements ☐ Yes ☐ No Porches and balconies ☐ Yes ☐ No
Prominent roof form ☐ Yes ☐ No
Windows and doors that emphasize vertical orientation ☐ Yes ☐ No C.3 Roof Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Hipped or Mansard roof with dormers ☐ Yes ☐ No
High-pitched roof (minimum 6:12 slope) ☐ Yes ☐ No
Asphalt shingles ☐ Yes ☐ No
Moderately overhanging eaves (maximum 12 inches) ☐ Yes ☐ No 696
12 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
C.4 Wall & Window Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Vertically-oriented rectangular windows arranged in symmetrical patterns ☐ Yes ☐ No Articulated lintels and sills ☐ Yes ☐ No
Window trim that contrasts with the color of body of the building ☐ Yes ☐ No Windows shall be recessed no deeper than 3 inches from outer wall ☐ Yes ☐ No C.5 Materials & Colors – Does the proposed project include the following? Brick, stone or smooth stucco cladding ☐ Yes ☐ No
Off-white and earth tones ☐ Yes ☐ No
White or contrasting trim ☐ Yes ☐ No
Asphalt shingles ☐ Yes ☐ No
C.6 Decorative Accents & Details – Does the proposed project include at least 3 of the following? Quoins at corners; color should contrast with body of the building ☐ Yes ☐ No Entry accents with real or faux stone ☐ Yes ☐ No
Recessed entries ☐ Yes ☐ No
Open terraces, porches and balconies with balustrades or metal railings ☐ Yes ☐ No Horizontal moulding accents ☐ Yes ☐ No
Decorative metal light fixtures ☐ Yes ☐ No
Arched windows, dormers or doors ☐ Yes ☐ No
697
13 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
Colonial Revival Style (see Section D)
Is the proposed project consistent with the following standards? If the answer is “no”, then the proposed project is inconsistent with the design standards.
D.2 Form & Massing – Does the proposed project include the following? Accentuated front entrance ☐ Yes ☐ No
Flat facades ☐ Yes ☐ No
Porches and shallow projects allowed ☐ Yes ☐ No
Side-gabled and front-gabled roof forms ☐ Yes ☐ No
D.3 Roof Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Side-gabled, with added front-gables allowed ☐ Yes ☐ No Medium to high-pitched roof (minimum 6:12 slope) ☐ Yes ☐ No Asphalt shingles ☐ Yes ☐ No
D.4 Wall & Window Designs – Does the proposed project include the following? Rectangular windows oriented vertically ☐ Yes ☐ No
698
14 | Page Ver1.0 06.30.21
Windows detailed with arched or flat lintels and sills ☐ Yes ☐ No Double-hung sashes with muntins ☐ Yes ☐ No
D.5 Materials & Colors – Does the proposed project include the following? Brick cladding, wood or vinyl siding ☐ Yes ☐ No
Attached townhouses shall alternate color and cladding from one unit to the next ☐ Yes ☐ No Off-white and earth tones, muted colors ☐ Yes ☐ No
Asphalt shingles ☐ Yes ☐ No
When shutters are utilized, their color shall contrast with the body of the building ☐ Yes ☐ No D.6 Decorative Accents & Details – Does the proposed project include at least 3 of the following? Front doors with fanlights or sidelights ☐ Yes ☐ No Front doors accented with pediments and pilasters ☐ Yes ☐ No Shallow porches with slender columns ☐ Yes ☐ No
Arched windows, dormers or doors ☐ Yes ☐ No
Decorative attic vents ☐ Yes ☐ No
Dentil molding at roofline ☐ Yes ☐ No
Dormers ☐ Yes ☐ No
699
CITY OF WILDOMAR
CC - REGULAR MEETING
GENERAL BUSINESS
Agenda Staff Report # 3.4
Meeting Date: August
9, 2023
SUBJECT:
Wildomar Community and Parks Foundation Community Event Partnership Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
SUBMITTED BY:
Daniel Torres
PREPARED BY:
Daniel Torres
ACTION:
Authorize the City Manager to sign the MOU with Wildomar Community and Parks Foundation dependent that the non-profit organization fulfills all requirements.
SUMMARY:
The Wildomar Community and Parks Foundation has applied for a Temporary Event Permit to conduct a clean up event in the area known as Sedco. The non-profit organization has desired for the City to partner in the event under the Community Event Policy.
BACKGROUND:
The City has coordinated with non-profit organizations, community groups, and local agencies to provide events and activities within the city. These partnerships are handled on a case by case basis. One of these events was the Love Your Neighborhood regional clean up conducted by the Western Riverside Council of Governments.
In the first quarter of the 2023 calendar year WRCOG reached out to the City regarding partnering to execute a “LOVE YOUR NEIGBORHOOD” clean up event. After an interior discussion, the city decided to proceed with the event if Lake Elsinore would be able to facilitate a partnership similar to 2021. WRCOG had communicated that Lake Elsinore was not able to conduct the event this year. Moving forward WRCOG had requested names of non-profit organizations that would be able to host clean up events on a smaller scale. Staff had provided WRCOG the contact information for the Wildomar Community and Parks Foundation.
Having coordinated with WRCOG, Bridgette Moore has requested to conduct a clean-up event focused in the area known as SEDCO on September 16, 2023, National Clean Up Day. City 700
staff had advised the foundation to complete a Temporary Event Permit in order to proceed with the event. Having received the application, the applicant had inquired to partner with the city under the Community Event Partnership Policy. Since the initial conversation, the foundation has secured Whiting-Turner as a co-partner.
DISCUSSION:
The extent of the potential city partnership would provide the foundation with staging the traffic control measure to safely conduct the event within the Sedco community. The Wildomar Community and Parks Foundation is subject to fulfilling all Temporary Event Permit requirements, pay the application fee, and indemnify the City and provide the required insurance coverage.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The expenses related to the staging of traffic control are estimated to between $900.00 - $1,300.00 and will be covered by the Community Services Department General Fund Budget.
ACCOUNT CODE:
100-410-4610-52116
ATTACHMENTS:
MOU Wildomar Community and Parks Foundation
TEP Application_National Clean Up Day
701
1 RIV #4833-0692-3348 v2
Attachment A
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
WILDOMAR COMMUNITY AND
PARKS FOUNDATION
COMMUNITY EVENT
PARTNERSHIP
702
2 RIV #4833-0692-3348 v2
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
(WILDOMAR COMMUNITY AND PARKS FOUNDATION COMMUNITY EVENT
PARTNERSHIP)
This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is entered into this day of , 2023 by and between the City of Wildomar, a California general law city, (“City”) and Wildomar Community and Parks Foundation, a California 501 (c) 3 non-profit. (“Foundation”). City and Foundation may be referred to individual or collectively as a “Party” or the “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. Foundation is a nonprofit organization with the goal to improve the quality of life within Wildomar by providing clean-up services.
B. Foundation desires to conduct a clean-up event on September 16, 2023 that focuses efforts to the area known as SEDCO HILLS (Event).
C. City desires to partner in the Event and provide hosting assistance to the Foundation to conduct the Event, as the Foundation provides a benefit to the community and the Event assist to improve the quality of life within the community.
D. The purpose and intent of this MOU is to set forth the mutual understanding of the Parties regarding the City’s partnership of the Event and hosting assistance to be provided.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1.0 PARTNERSHIP AND MARKETING
1.1 City will partner in the Event on September 16, 2023, in the form of benefits described in section 2.1 provided that the Event is held as stated in the Temporary Event Permit.
If the Event is not held on September 16, 2023, the City shall incur no obligation to commit the partnership toward a future Event
.
1.2 Foundation agrees to identify City in all marketing materials for the Event, including digital and print advertising. Marketing materials for the Event will include the tagline “Go Wildomar” and the City’s logo, which the City hereby gives permission to Foundation to use in conjunction with the Event.
703
3 RIV #4833-0692-3348 v2
2.0 ALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP BENEFITS
2.1 The partnership identified in Section 1.1 of this MOU will be in relation to the benefits the City will provide the Foundation per the Community Event Partnership Policy. As stated on page 3 of the policy, a staff liaison will be assigned to Foundation to assist and confirm that all Temporary Event Application requirement are fulfilled. The Foundation will be required to fulfill the permit process, provide the required insurance documents, and any required inspections and reporting. The city will facilitate all traffic control measures for the Event.
3.0 PERMITS AND APPROVALS
Foundation shall obtain all necessary permits and approvals from the City and all other agencies with jurisdiction over the Event. Nothing in this MOU shall be construed as altering or waiving the City’s permit and approval requirements applicable to the Event.
4.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS
4.1 Either party may terminate this MOU upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other Party. In the event that a legal action is brought challenging this MOU, either Party may terminate this MOU effective immediately by written notice to the other Party.
4.2 If any term, condition or covenant of this MOU is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this MOU shall not be affected thereby and the MOU shall be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s).
4.3 Waiver by any Party to this MOU of any term, condition, or covenant of this MOU shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this MOU shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this MOU.
4.4 This MOU shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative on behalf of City. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make amendments to this MOU. No amendment to or modification of this MOU shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Foundation and City. 704
4 RIV #4833-0692-3348 v2
4.5 The person or persons executing this MOU on behalf of Foundation represents and warrants that he/she/they has/have the authority to so execute this MOU and to bind Foundation to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this MOU on the date and year first-above written.
CITY OF WILDOMAR WILDOMAR COMMUNITY AND PARKS
FOUNDATION
Daniel A. York By: _
City Manager Its:
ATTEST:
By: _
Janet Morales Its:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Thomas Jex
City Attorney
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
CITY OF WILDOMAR
CC - REGULAR MEETING
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Meeting Date: August
9, 2023
SUBJECT:
Future Agenda Items
SUBMITTED BY:
Janet Morales
ACTION:
Title- Councilmember-Anticipated Date
1. Amend Fencing Requirements - Benoit - Fall 2023
2. Amend Multi-Family Design Guidelines - Benoit - Aug 2023
3. Official reserve policy - Marquez - TBD
719
CITY OF WILDOMAR
CC - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 4.1
Meeting Date: August
9, 2023
SUBJECT:
Cemetery Minutes - July 12 2023 - Regular Meeting
SUBMITTED BY:
Janet Morales
ACTION:
Approve the minutes as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. July 12, 2023 Cemetery Minutes
720
MINUTES
CITY OF WILDOMAR
CEMETERY DISTRICT –REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JULY 14, 2023
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
23873 CLINTON KEITH ROAD SUITE 106
WILDOMAR, CA 92595
CALL TO ORDER THE WILDOMAR CEMETERY DISTRICT
The regular session meeting was called to order by Chair Morabito at 6:48 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Members in attendance: Ashlee DePhillippo, Carlos Marquez, Dustin Nigg, Joseph Morabito Members absent: Bridgette Moore
Staff in Attendance: City Manager York, City Attorney Jex, City Clerk Morales, Community Development Director Bassi, Finance Manager Jantz, Public Works Director Farag, Administrative Services Director Schrader, Development Manager Stadnik, IT Technician Sung, and Community Services Director Torres.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
None.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED
Moved by Dustin Nigg, seconded by Carlos Marquez to Approve the Agenda as presented.
Motion Approved: 4 – 0
Voting For: Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Carlos Marquez, Dustin Nigg Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Bridgette Moore
4. CEMETERY CONSENT CALENDAR
Moved by Dustin Nigg, seconded by Carlos Marquez to Approve the Agenda as presented.
Motion Approved: 4 – 0
Voting For: Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Carlos Marquez, Dustin Nigg Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Bridgette Moore
721
4.1 Minutes – June 14, 2023 Regular Meeting
Approved the minutes as presented.
4.2 Warrant Register Cemetery May 2023
Approved the following:
For Fiscal Year 2022/2023
1. Warrant Register dated 06-08-2023 in the amount of $3,348.64.
2. Warrant Register dated 06-15-2023 in the amount of $1,890.02.
3. Warrant Register dated 06-22-2023 in the amount of $1,371.60.
4. Warrant Register dated 06-29-2023 in the amount of $4,898.27.
4.3 May 2023 Cemetery Treasurers Report
Approved the Treasurer’s Report for May 2023.
4.4 Authorize use of Cemetery District Property, APN 376-060-031, as a Temporary Construction Staging Area for the City of Wildomar’s Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Project (CIP 057-2) and Slurry Seal Project (CIP 058-2) Contractor
Authorized the General Manager to sign the License Agreement and approve the use of District property, APN 376-060-031, as a temporary construction staging area for the City of Wildomar’s Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Project (CIP 057-2) and Slurry Seal Project (CIP 058-2) Contractor All American Asphalt.
5. CEMETERY PUBLIC HEARINGS
None scheduled.
6. CEMETERY GENERAL BUSINESS
None scheduled.
GENERAL MANAGER REPORT
None.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.
ADJOURN THE WILDOMAR CEMETERY DISTRICT MEETING
There being no further business, Chair Morabito adjourned the meeting at 6:49 p.m.
Submitted by: Approved by:
Janet Morales, CMC Joseph Morabito
City Clerk Chair
722
CITY OF WILDOMAR
CC - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 4.2
Meeting Date: August
9, 2023
SUBJECT:
Amended Minutes - February 8, 2023 - Regular Meeting
SUBMITTED BY:
Janet Morales
ACTION:
Approve the amended minutes as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. February 8, 2023 Approved Minutes
2. February 8, 2023 Amended Minutes
723
724
725
726
MINUTES
CITY OF WILDOMAR
CEMETERY DISTRICT –REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2023
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
23873 CLINTON KEITH ROAD SUITE 106
WILDOMAR, CA 92595
Members in attendance: Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore, Carlos Marquez
CALL TO ORDER THE WILDOMAR CEMETERY DISTRICT
The regular session meeting was called to order by Chair Morabito at 7:45 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members absent: Dustin Nigg
Councilmember Nigg’s absence was excused.
Staff in Attendance: City Manager York, City Attorney Jex, Community Development Director Bassi, Acting City Treasurer Jantz, Building Inspection Supervisor Burns, Economic Development Director Davidson, Public Works Director Farag, Senior Code Enforcement Officer Parker, Development Manager Stadnik, IT Technician Sung, and Community Services Director Torres.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
BOARD COMMUNICATIONS
None
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED
Moved by Carlos Marquez; seconded by Bridgette Moore to Approve the Agenda as presented.
Motion Approved: 4 - 0
Voting For: Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore, Carlos Marquez Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Dustin Nigg
4. CEMETERY CONSENT CALENDAR
Moved by Carlos Marquez; seconded by Bridgette Moore to Approve all items on the consent calendar.
Motion Approved: 4- 0
Voting For: Joseph Morabito, Ashlee DePhillippo, Bridgette Moore, Carlos Marquez 727
Voting Against: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Dustin Nigg
4.1 Minutes-January 18, 2022-Regular Meeting
Approved Minutes as presented.
4.2 Warrant Register Cemetery January 2023
Approved the following:
For Fiscal Year 2022/2023.
1. Warrant Register dated 01-05-2023 in the amount of $14.99.
2. Warrant Register dated 01-12-2023 in the amount of $302.68.
3. Warrant Register dated 01-19-2023 in the amount of $2,679.04.
4.3 December 2022 Cemetery Treasurers Report
Approved the Treasurer’s Report for December 2022.
4.4 2023 Wildomar Cemetery District Records Management Retention Schedule Update
Adopted a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. WCD2023 - 01
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE WILDOMAR CEMETERY
DISTRICT, WILDOMAR, CALIFORNIA, UPDATING THE RECORDS RETENTION
SCHEDULE FOR THE WILDOMAR CEMETERY DISTRICT
5. CEMETERY PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
6. CEMETERY GENERAL BUSINESS
None.
GENERAL MANAGER REPORT
None.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.
ADJOURN THE WILDOMAR CEMETERY DISTRICT MEETING
There being no further business, Chair Morabito adjourned the meeting at 7:47 p.m. 728
Submitted by: Approved by:
Daniel York Janet Morales Joseph Morabito
City Manager City Clerk Chair
729
CITY OF WILDOMAR
CC - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 4.3
Meeting Date: August
9, 2023
SUBJECT:
Warrant Register Cemetery July 2023
SUBMITTED BY:
Nicholas Neidiffer
PREPARED BY:
Nicholas Neidiffer
ACTION:
For Fiscal Year 2022/2023
1. Warrant Register dated 07-13-2023 in the amount of $2,560.38.
2. Warrant Register dated 07-20-2023 in the amount of $53.93.
3. Warrant Register dated 07-27-2023 in the amount of $4,620.68.
For Fiscal Year 2023/2024
1. Warrant Register dated 07-03-2023 in the amount of $19,919.
2. Warrant Register dated 07-13-2023 in the amount of $591.21.
3. Warrant Register dated 07-20-2023 in the amount of $61.95.
4. Warrant Register dated 07-27-2023 in the amount of $283.32.
DISCUSSION:
The Wildomar Cemetery District requires that the Trustees audit payments of demands and direct the General Manager to issue checks. The Warrant Registers are submitted for approval.
FISCAL IMPACT:
These Warrant Registers will have a budgetary impact in the amount and fiscal year noted in the recommendation section of this report. These costs are included in the Fiscal Year 2022/23 and 2023/24 Budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
Warrant Reg CEM July 2023 Voucher Listings
730
07/13/2023
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 5:05:00PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 216869 7/13/2023 000012 ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL, WATER DISTRICT12440776 05/20/23-06/20/23 CEMETERY WATER
SERVICE
1,188.78
Total : 1,188.78
216870 7/13/2023 001986 TALENTZOK 174971 0000464 TEMPORARY STAFFING W/E 07/02/23 1,371.60 Total : 1,371.60
Bank total : 2,560.38 2 Vouchers for bank code : wf
2,560.38Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 2
731
07/20/2023
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 1:32:44PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 216917 7/20/2023 000790 SPARKLETTS 52023 CEMETERY DRINKING WATER THROUGH 05/20/23
96.32 -48.88CREDIT: CEMETERY THROUGH 05/20/23 CC52023CR
6.49CEMETERY DRINKING WATER THROUGH
06/17/23
61723
Total : 53.93
Bank total : 53.93 1 Vouchers for bank code : wf
53.93Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 1
732
07/27/2023
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 10:56:05AM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 216953 7/27/2023 001300 DELL MARKETING L.P. 10675982522 0000461 REPLACEMENT COMPUTERS 4,620.68 Total : 4,620.68
Bank total : 4,620.68 1 Vouchers for bank code : wf
4,620.68Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 1
733
07/03/2023
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 1:28:13PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 216814 7/3/2023 000433 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT, AUTHORITYGS2307100221 CEMETERY FY 23/24 WORKERS COMP/GEN LIAB/
19,386.00
-327.00CREDIT CEMETERY GL DIVIDEND FY 23/24GS2307100221CR Total : 19,059.00
216815 7/3/2023 000434 PONTEM SOFTWARE BY RIA 12084 07/01/23-06/30/24 CEMETERY
MANAGEMENT SO
860.00
Total : 860.00
Bank total : 19,919.00 2 Vouchers for bank code : wf
19,919.00Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 2
734
07/13/2023
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 5:05:19PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 216871 7/13/2023 000367 CINTAS CORPORATION 4160579428 STAFF UNIFORM & TOWEL MAINTENANCE 141.66 Total : 141.66
216872 7/13/2023 000186 RIGHTWAY 347528 07/03/23-07/30/23 (2) CEMETERY
RESTROOM
449.55
Total : 449.55
Bank total : 591.21 2 Vouchers for bank code : wf
591.21Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 2
735
07/20/2023
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 1:33:10PM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 216918 7/20/2023 000790 SPARKLETTS 71523 CEMETERY DRINKING WATER THROUGH 07/15/23
61.95 Total : 61.95
Bank total : 61.95 1 Vouchers for bank code : wf
61.95Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 1
736
07/27/2023
Voucher List
City of Wildomar
1 10:56:28AM
Page:
Bank code : wf
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 216954 7/27/2023 000367 CINTAS CORPORATION 4161209861 STAFF UNIFORM & TOWEL MAINTENANCE 141.66 141.66STAFF UNIFORM & TOWEL MAINTENANCE4161949909
Total : 283.32
Bank total : 283.32 1 Vouchers for bank code : wf
283.32Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 1
737
CITY OF WILDOMAR
CC - REGULAR MEETING
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 4.4
Meeting Date: August
9, 2023
SUBJECT:
June 2023 Cemetery Treasurers Report
SUBMITTED BY:
Adam Jantz
PREPARED BY:
Adam Jantz
ACTION:
Approve the Treasurer’s Report for June 2023.
SUMMARY:
June 2023 Cemetery Treasurer's Report
DISCUSSION:
Attached is the Treasurer’s Report for Cash and Investments for the month of June 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is only a report of balances for the Cemetery, therefore it has no fiscal impact.
ACCOUNT CODE:
300-1011
301-1011
ATTACHMENTS:
June 2023 Cemetery Treasurer's Report
738
PERCENT
OF DAYS STATED
FUND BOOK VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE PORTFOLIO TO MAT. RATE 301 $ 403,714.61 $ 403,714.61 $ 403,714.61 28.70% 0 5.24% 300 $ 1,011,781.84 $ 1,011,781.84 $ 1,003,086.08 71.30% 771 Variable $ 1,415,496.45 $ 1,415,496.45 $ 1,406,800.69 100.00%
+ + WITHDRAWALS/
BEGINNING DEPOSITS/ INTEREST SALES/ ENDING STATED
FUND BALANCE PURCHASES DEPOSITED MATURITIES BALANCE RATE 301 $ 402,145.20 $ - $ 1,569.41 $ - $ 403,714.61 5.24% 300 $ 1,008,699.52 $ - $ 3,082.32 $ - $ 1,011,781.84 Variable $ 1,410,844.72 $ - $ 4,651.73 $ - $ 1,415,496.45 City Treasurer
In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, as City Treasurer for the Wildomar Cemetery District, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the District's expenditure requirements for the next six months.
I also certify that this report reflects all Government Agency pooled investments and all of the District's Bank Balances.
Heidi Schrader 7/13/2023
Heidi Schrader Date
TOTAL
WILDOMAR CEMETERY DISTRICT
TREASURER'S REPORT FOR
CASH AND INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
June 2023
DISTRICT INVESTMENT
ISSUER
ISSUER
TOTAL
CAMP POOL
CAMP MANAGED ACCOUNT
CAMP POOL
CAMP MANAGED ACCOUNT
739
Senate Bill No. 329
CHAPTER 27
An act to amend Section 36516 of the Government Code, relating to local government.
[Approved by Governor June 29, 2023. Filed with Secretary of State June 29, 2023.]
legislative counsel’s digest
SB 329, Dodd. Cities: city council members: compensation.
Existing law authorizes a city council to enact an ordinance to pro vide each member of the city council a salary based upon the population of the city, as specified. Existing la w authorizes that amount to be increased by the city council by an amount that does not e xceed 5% for each calendar year from the operati ve date of the last adjustment of the salary that is in effect when the increase is enacted. Existing law provides for the procedures by which a city may enact ordinances.
This bill would increase the maximum amount of salary, based upon the population of the city, that may be approved by an ordinance passed by the city council, as specified. The bill w ould authorize the salary of council members to be increased beyond the specified maximums to an amount not exceeding the greater of either 5% for each calendar year from the operative date of the last adjustment of the salary in ef fect when the ordinance or amendment is enacted, or an amount equal to inflation since January 1, 2024, based upon the California Consumer Price Inde x, which shall not exceed 10% for each calendar year. The bill would require the city council to consider the adoption of an ordinance to increase council member compensation in open session during at least 2 regular meetings of the city council.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a) The compensation schedule for general la w cities has not been adjusted since 1984, meaning that city council compensation has not k ept pace with inflation.
(b) Allowing cities to adjust their compensation for inflation since 1984 may help city councils become more diverse because increased compensation can help individuals from across different income levels receive sufficient income from their service to help ensure that they can continue to serve the public and support their families.
SEC. 2. Section 36516 of the Government Code is amended to read:
96 538740
36516. (a) (1) A city council may enact an ordinance pro viding that each member of the city council shall recei ve a salary based on the population of the city as set forth in paragraph (2).
(2) The salaries approved by ordinance under paragraph (1) shall be as follows:
(A) In cities up to and including 35,000 in population, up to and including nine hundred fifty dollars ($950) per month.
(B) In cities over 35,000 up to and including 50,000 in population, up to and including one thousand two hundred seventy-five dollars ($1,275) per month.
(C) In cities over 50,000 up to and including 75,000 in population, up to and including one thousand six hundred dollars ($1,600) per month. (D) In cities over 75,000 up to and including 150,000 in population, up to and including one thousand nine hundred dollars ($1,900) per month. (E) In cities over 150,000 up to and including 250,000 in population, up to and including two thousand five hundred fifty dollars ($2,550) per month. (F) In cities over 250,000 population, up to and including three thousand two hundred dollars ($3,200) per month.
(3) For the purposes of this subdivision, the population of a city shall be determined by the last preceding federal census, or a subsequent census, or estimate validated by the Department of Finance.
(4) The salary of council members may be increased beyond the amount provided in this subdi vision by an ordinance or by an amendment to an ordinance, but the amount of the increase shall not e xceed the greater of either of the following:
(A) An amount equal to 5 percent for each calendar year from the operative date of the last adjustment of the salary in ef fect when the ordinance or amendment is enacted.
(B) An amount equal to inflation since January 1, 2024, based upon the California Consumer Price Inde x, which shall not e xceed 10 percent for each calendar year.
(5) No ordinance shall be enacted or amended to provide automatic future increases in salary.
(b) Notwithstanding subdi vision (a), at an y municipal election, the question of whether city council members shall receive a salary for services, and the amount of that salary, may be submitted to the electors. If a majority of the electors v oting at the election f avor it, all of the council members shall receive the salary specified in the election call. The salary of council members may be increased beyond the amount provided in this section or decreased below the amount in the same manner.
(c) Unless specifically authorized by another statute, a city council may not enact an ordinance providing for compensation to city council members in excess of that authorized by the procedures described in subdivisions (a) and (b). For the purposes of this section, compensation includes payment for service by a city council member on a commission, committee, board, authority, or similar body on which the city council member serv es. If the other statute that authorizes the compensation does not specify the amount 96 — 2 — Ch. 27
539741
of compensation, the maximum amount shall be one hundred fifty dollars ($150) per month for each commission, committee, board, authority , or similar body.
(d) Any amounts paid by a city for retirement, health and welf are, and federal social security benefits shall not be included for purposes of determining salary under this section, pro vided that the same benefits are available and paid by the city for its employees.
(e) Any amounts paid by a city to reimburse a council member for actual and necessary expenses pursuant to Section 36514.5 shall not be included for purposes of determining salary pursuant to this section. (f) A city council member may w aive any or all of the compensation permitted by this section.
(g) (1) For the purposes of this section, a city council shall consider the adoption of an ordinance to increase compensation in open session during at least two regular meetings of the city council.
(2) At the first meeting, the city council shall present the proposed ordinance, which shall include findings demonstrating the need for the increased compensation. The ordinance shall not be adopted at the first meeting.
(3) At least seven days after the first meeting, the city council shall hold a second meeting to consider whether to adopt the ordinance.
O
96 Ch. 27 — 3 —
540742