Agenda packet — Woodlake City Council, March 11, 2024 (part 1 of 2)

WOODLAKE CITY
Mayor Mendoza • Vice-Mayor Ortiz • Councilmember Martinez • Councilmember Valero • Councilmember Wallace

REGULAR MEETING

CITY COUNCIL
350 N Valencia Blvd, Woodlake, CA 93286
559-564-8055 • www.cityofwoodlake.com
Date: March 11, 2024 (Monday)
Time: 6:30 p.m.

Place: City Council Chambers
145 N. Magnolia
Woodlake CA 93286

TELECONFERENCE MEETING
Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89176141818
Meeting ID: 891 7614 1818
One tap mobile
+16699009128,89176141818# US (San Jose)
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the California Ralph M. Brown Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, including auxiliary aids, translation requests, or other accommodations, or to be able to access this agenda and documents in the agenda packet, please contact City Hall at 559-564-8055 at least 3 days prior to the meeting.

The full agenda including staff reports and supporting materials are available at City Hall.

I. CALL TO ORDER & WELCOME
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE
IV. PUBLIC COMMENT
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Council on items within its jurisdiction but not on this agenda. NOTE: Prior to action by the Council on any item on this agenda, the public may comment on that item.

Unscheduled comments may be limited to 3 minutes.

All items on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine and noncontroversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. Items pulled from the Calendar will be considered separately.

IV. CONSENT CALENDAR –ACTION AND INFORMATION ITEMS
Request Approval of the Consent Calendar Action Items (IV A-C) A. Action: Approval of Minutes of the regular meeting held on February 12, 2024 (Pages 1-8)
B. Action: Approval of Warrants (Pages 9-57)
C. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of the February 2024 Monthly Report of Investments (Pages 58-60)
V. ACTION/DISCUSSION ITEM
A. Information: Recognize U.S. Towers as the Recycler of the Year (Page 61) B. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of Certification for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Final Environmental Impact Report PUBLIC HEARING (Pages 62-247)
C. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Extension of a Declaration of Local State of Emergency by the City of Woodlake (Pages 248-250)
D. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of the City of Woodlake’s Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Budget Amendment No. 3 (Pages 251-326)
E. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of the Purchase of the Property with APN No. 060-070-010 for the Construction of the City of Woodlake Civic Center (Pages 327-365)
F. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approve the Purchase for the Right of Way Associated with the Antelope Creek Park Project and Authorize the City Administrator to Execute all Necessary Documents (Pages 366-389) G. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Initiate the Formation of the Greenwood Phase I & II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02 (Pages 390-391) H. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Solicit and Consider Input on Possible Competitive and Supplemental Activities to Include in a 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application and Authorize Staff to Proceed with the Application PUBLIC COMMENT (Pages 392-396)
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Information: Items from Staff
B. Information: Items from Council Member
C. Request from Council Members for Future Agenda Items VII. CLOSED SESSION
As provided in the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code sections 54950 et seq., the Governing Board may meet in closed session with members of its staff and its attorneys.

These sessions are not open to the public and may not be attended by members of the public. The matters the Council will meet on in closed session are identified below or are those matters appropriately identified in open session as requiring immediate attention and arising after the
posting of the agenda. Any public reports of action taken in the closed session will be made in accordance with Government Code sections 54957.1 “Documents: If distributed to the Council less than 72 hours before a regular meeting, any public records which are subject to public inspection and pertain to an open-session item on the regular meeting agenda shall be available at the following address at the time they are distributed to a majority of the Council: 350 North Valencia Boulevard, Woodlake, California 93286. Public records distributed to the Council at a public meeting will be available to the public at such meeting if they were prepared by the City.

Exemptions and details in Government Code§ 54957.5 (a) shall apply.” II. ADJOURN
The next scheduled City Council meeting will be held on Monday, March 25, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. at City Council Chambers, located at 145 N. Magnolia, Woodlake, CA 93286 or via Zoom.

City Council:

Rudy Mendoza – Mayor
Frances Ortiz - Vice Mayor
William Valero – Councilmember
Misty Wallace – Councilmember
Jose L. Martinez - Councilmember

WOODLAKE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 12, 2024
PRESENT: Ortiz, Martinez, Wallace & Valero
VIA ZOOM:

PRESENT: Lara, Zamora, Marquez, Llamas, Reynolds, Bolanos & Zacarias ABSENT: Mendoza

FLAG SALUTE
Public Comment
Frances Mann, 789 N. Palm, Woodlake – Mrs. Mann stated she can taste and smell the chlorine in her drinking water at home. City Administrator Lara stated regular testing is done and there is no indication of too much chlorine in the water. He will ask staff to check the levels tomorrow.

He asked Mrs. Mann that if this happens again, to please call city hall immediately.

Public Comment Via Zoom
Jose Bedolla, 33776 Rd. 204, Woodlake – Mr. Bedolla asked if city staff knew what caused the flooding in Woodlake on February 1, 2024. City Administrator Lara stated there was a significant of rain fall in a short amount of time.

IV. CONSENT CALENDAR –ACTION AND INFORMATION ITEMS
Request Approval of the Consent Calendar Action Items (IV A-C) A. Action: Approval of Minutes of the regular meeting held on January 8, 2024 B. Action: Approval of Warrants
C. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of the January 2024 Monthly Report of Investments

ON A MOTION BY MARTINEZ, SECOND BY VALERO, IT WAS
VOTED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR. APPROVED
UNANIMOUSLY BY ROLL CALL VOTE.

V. ACTION/DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approve and Accept the Close Out Report on the 2018 CDBG Storm Drain Phase II Project
Community Development Director Llamas reported the following: The City was authorized to apply for CDBG 2018 funding year on January 14, 2019, and was awarded $2,700,000 in CDBG funding in response to the 2018 CDBG NOFA application. Program Income funds in the amount of $509,272.48 were also utilized to supplement the project budget. The City has a three phase project to pump stormwater to a new basin, instead of pumping the water into Bravo Lake. The first phase of the project has been completed and consists of constructing a new stormwater pump near Bravo Lake. The second phase, the Storm Drain Phase II Project, consists of building a new stormwater line of approximately 4,200 linear feet of 60” pipe that will move the water from the newly constructed pump location to the proposed stormwater retention basin at Ropes and Mulberry. The project was awarded for construction in late 2022.

Due to the unforeseen delays regarding the rising water table and recent severe storms, the project’s construction schedule is now nearing the final workstations for completion. The grant’s final reimbursement date was September 15, 2023. Since this project has met the national objectives required by HCD by providing flood drainage 1 improvements to the community, HCD has recommended that we proceed with the close out documents.

ON A MOTION BY MARTINEZ, SECOND BY WALLACE IT WAS VOTED

TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AND APPROVE AND ACCEPT THE CLOSE OUT REPORT ON THE 2018 CDBG STORM DRAIN PHASE II PROJECT.

APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY BY ROLL CALL VOTE.

B. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of the City Engineer’s Report for the Greenwood Subdivision Phase I & 2 Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22- 02 and Set March 11, 2024 for a Public Hearing to Set the Rates for the District Community Development Director Llamas reported the following: As part of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Council sets a public hearing date for those wishing to comment on any of the individual assessment districts in the City of Woodlake. This date will be set as March 11, 2024 for the new Greenwood Subdivision Phase 1 & 2 Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 22-02. All assessment district property owners will be notified of the public hearing date and location. Prior to any action by the City Council, the City Engineer develops an engineer’s report that breaks down the costs necessary to maintain each assessment district.

The individual engineer’s reports, for the assessment district, breaks down the costs necessary to maintain the district. The assessment allows for maintenance of grounds and lights plus incidental costs such as administration and engineering. The District will be maintained by City staff. At the March 11, 2024, City Council meeting, a public hearing will be held for all property owners of the assessment districts wishing to comment on their district.

ON A MOTION BY MARTINEZ SECOND BY WALLACE IT WAS VOTED TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AND APPROVE THE CITY ENGINEER’S
REPORT FO RTHE GREENWOOD SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 & 2 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTINB ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 22-02 AND SET MARCH 11, 2024 AS THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE. APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY BY ROLL CALL VOTE.

C. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Authorization to Initiate the Proposition 218 Process (Rate Increase for Refuse Services), Set a Public Hearing Date, and Approve Requirements for the Submission and Tabulation of Protests Community Development Director Llamas reported the following: Proposition 218 requires the City to provide notice and allow opportunity for a written protest prior to implementing a utility rate increase; if a majority protest is received then the rate increase cannot be adopted. If protests do not represent a “majority protest”, then the City may adopt the rate increase.

As part of the City’s contract for refuse services with Mid-Valley Disposal, the City is proposing a modification of Woodlake’s refuse rates for the following reasons: 1.) Comply with the agreement with Mid Valley Disposal to increase rates annually according to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) postings and 2.) To comply with CA Senate Bill 1383 tracking and reporting of organic waste. The revenue from the modified rates and charges will not be more than the funds required for the City to provide adequate refuse service to City customers. The rates would receive an increase in CPI each year for the following five years from the current rate of $30.92 to the projected rate of $32.05 in July of 2024 for residential. Please note that currently the City is only charging $27.50 as that was its cap which was approved with its 2019 Proposition 218 Process. The City has the necessary funding in the Refuse Fund to cover the current cost difference.
2 The City’s process for adopting the rate increase is as follows:

1. The first step is providing staff the direction to initiate the process. An affirmative vote on this agenda item tonight does not raise the refuse rates; it simply directs staff to proceed with the process.

2. Mail notices at least 45 days before public hearing. The second step in the process of adjusting rates is to mail notices to all refuse customers within the City’s service area.

A standard letter will be sent out describing the amount of the rate adjustment, stating the effective date of the adjustment if approved, advising the customer of the protest procedure, and stating the date of the Public Hearing. Those who wish to protest must submit a written protest.

3. Hold Public Hearing. On the appointed date (tentatively April 22, 2024), the City Council will hold a public hearing and receive testimony on the matter of the proposed rate adjustment.

4. Approval of resolution at same meeting as hearing. According to the Public Hearing, if a majority protest has not occurred and the City Council approves of the rate increase, the City Council will approve a resolution pursuant to Woodlake Municipal Code section 8.16.

ON A MOTION BY MARTINEZ SECOND BY ORTIZ IT WAS VOTED TO

ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AND AUTHORIZE TO INITIATE THE
PROPOSITION 218 PROCESS. APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY BY ROLL
CALL VOTE.

D. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Solicit and Consider Input on Possible Competitive and Supplemental Activities to Include in a 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application and Authorize Staff to Proceed with the Application – PUBLIC

COMMENT
City Administrator Lara reported the following: CDBG Program regulations require that the City conduct a public hearing on all CDBG-related matters to provide for and encourage citizen participation, particularly by low and moderate income persons who reside in areas in which CDBG funds are used. Therefore, when the public hearing is opened, the public will be invited to comment on possible competitive and supplemental activities to include in a 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application.

Public notices in both English and Spanish will be published in the February 21, 2024 and February 28, 2024 issues of The Sun-Gazette Newspaper notifying the public of public hearings on both March 11, 2024 and March 25, 2024 regarding the 2023 CDBG NOFA Amendment #1 Application.

On January 31, 2024, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) is announcing the release of Amendment #1 to the 2023 CDBG Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). The original NOFA was for approximately $19 million in federal funds for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program only for applications from projects that remain on the waitlist established for Over-the-Counter projects after the 2019-2020 NOFA. This amendment makes another $19 million for Housing, Community Development and Economic Development Projects in an Over-the-Counter process.

Funding for this NOFA is available to the state from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, and 24 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 570 Subpart I “State Community Development Block Grant Program”. These regulations require the state to make funds available to the state’s non-entitlement Units of Local Government. Units of general local government are defined by HUD as political subdivisions of the state, which in California are towns, cities, and counties. Only nonfederally recognized Tribes can receive funding through applications submitted by nonentitlement Units of Local Government. No direct funding from the Department can be provided to Tribes, Tribal Designated Housing Entities, or nonprofits. 3 The Application deadline will be when funds are exhausted or Tuesday April 30, 2024, whichever comes first. Applications will be accepted on a first come, first serve basis.

ON A MOTION BY MARTINEZ SECOND BY WALLACE IT WAS VOTED

TO ADOOPT THE RESOLUTION SOLICIT AND CONSIDERE INPUT ON

POSSIBLE COMPETITIVE AND SUPPLEMENTAL ACTIVITES TO
INCLUDE IN A 2023 CDBG NOFA AMENDMENT #1 APPLICATION AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PROCEED WITH THE APPLICATION.

APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY BY ROLL CALL VOTE.

E. Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of the City of Woodlake’s Single Audit for the Year Ended June 30, 2023
City Administrator Lara reported the following: The City of Woodlake undergoes an annual independent single audit of its major Federal programs to assure compliance with the requirements described in the OMB Compliance Supplement. For Fiscal Year 2022/2023, the City of Woodlake contracted Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP to perform its City independent single audit.

The audit is conducted with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that the audit is performed to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the City financial statements are free of material misstatement. The audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. The audit will also consider the City’s internal controls over financial reporting and test its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters.

ON A MOTION BY WALLACE, SECOND BY VALERO IT WAS VOTED TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AND APPROVE THE CITY OF WOODLAKE’S SINGLE AUDIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 APPROVED
UNANIMOUSLY BY ROLL CALL VOTE.

VI. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Information: Items from Staff
Community Services Director Reynolds – Reported updates on all upcoming events. Report is attached.

City Administrator Lara – Reported housing is growing. Also the parks and recreation enrollment is growing and doing well.

Student Representative Bolanos – See attached report.

B. Information: Items from Council Members
Councilmember Martinez – Reported he was sorry he missed the ribbon cutting ceremony for the new dance studio but heard it was a great event. He also asked if the city has seen a decrease in graffiti vandalism. Chief Marquez stated unfortunately the city has had an increase in graffiti vandalism but public works staff have been able to clean and remove graffiti quickly.

Vice-Mayor Ortiz – Thanked city staff for all their hard work. 4 VII. CLOSED SESSION

NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
As provided in the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code sections 54950 et seq., the Governing Board may meet in closed session with members of its staff and its attorneys. These sessions are not open to the public and may not be attended by members of the public. The matters the Council will meet on in closed session are identified below or are those matters appropriately identified in open session as requiring immediate attention and arising after the posting of the agenda. Any public reports of action taken in the closed session will be made in accordance with Government Code sections 54957.1.
“Documents: If distributed to the Council less than 72 hours before a regular meeting, any public records which are subject to public inspection and pertain to an open-session item on the regular meeting agenda shall be available at the following address at the time they are distributed to a majority of the Council: 350 North Valencia Boulevard, Woodlake, California 93286. Public records distributed to the Council at a public meeting will be available to the public at such meeting if they were prepared by the City.

Exemptions and details in Government Code§ 54957.5 (a) shall apply.” VIII. ADJOURN
The next scheduled City Council meeting will be held on Monday, February 26, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. at City Council Chambers located at 145 N. Magnolia, Woodlake, CA 93286 or via Zoom.

City Council:

Rudy Mendoza - Mayor
Frances Ortiz - Vice Mayor
Jose L. Martinez – Councilmember
William Valero – Councilmember
Misty Wallace - Councilmember
Meeting adjourned at 7:22 pm
Submitted by,
Irene Zacarias
City Clerk
5 -H,*tt B R UIRY 2024G[1t il D[n
, I
t:
i-= ,-|!I I Slood orrc con.f,mlt- I I (commmity(lr)
1l
=Gr=
i=
vd.vMlnlthot6 I I
[Dilntmstu.lio] I I
Im l2rI *".**-* IIe-tw*taua"., I I z-roa- I
l8
l5
l'"Pilotn, I xa&+fior:lopm
I looo"nt*stroiol
Bls
1'*cl4'7* lxacb-ofiO6pm I lDo$rnromgludiol
22 21
t710"*ffi
V&ymHFhot6
I
I I
28 2.M.t
Clty Ccrncil l.t3. Registratioo Ends
6 City Council Student Representattve 2112124
Evan Bolanos
FJ White
o Before we went on Christmas break Santa and Jingle his Elf visited FJ White. o We had the service dogs on campus and they went to every classroom. o Our students are participating in Poetry and Prose held by TCOE. Tryouts for Poetry and Prose will be Feb 23.
o We will be celebrating Dr. Seuss's birthday the week of February 26 with dress up days, read alouds and fun activities.

CRES
o Feb. 26-March 1 - Read Across America Celebration
o Mon. Crazy hat /stripes day
o Tues. Crazy socks
o Wed. Wacky Wednesday, crazy hair/mismatched clothes
r Thurs. Pajama Day
o Friday - CRES Literacy Parade
o March 18-22 - Parent teacher conferences
o March 25 - April 3 Easter Break
o April 1gth ALL school carnival
7 WVMS
a
WHS
a
Bengal VIP students received a Pizza Factory luncheon this past Thursday. These students were selected by their teachers for outstanding performance both in and outside of the classroom in the area of academics and character ( lntegrity was the focus) Last week was Kindness Week at WVMS! On Thursday students wrote out positive affirmations on post-its for themselves, classmates, and staff during homeroom. Our Leadership Teacher, Erin Burchett is gathering up all the post-its and will showcase them on campus on Friday.

February 20lh -23rd - Our second set of Gth-grade students will be up at SCICON February 28th- 6th and 7th-grade students register for 24-25 classes Wrestling postseason grind rolls on. 5 Tigers advance to the Central Section Masters Tournament. lsaac Nicolas (2nd), Angel Garcia (5th), Aldo Rodriguez (7th), Brenden Doyle (7th), and lsabella Urias (2nd) will be representing Woodlake, as they try to earn a ticket to State. Boys and Girls tournaments will be held at Selland Arena in Fresno, on Friday and Saturday (2116-17)'
Boy's Tennis will have their first scrimmage match tomorrow at home against Coalinga, February 13th at 4:00pm.

The FFA will be doing an industry tour of the World Ag. Expo on February 14th. a
o
a
8 City of Woodlake
Summary of Disbursments and Payroll
City Council Meeting March l1-,2024
s8s,048.80
$7,57s.34
586,871,.78
57,533.40

DTSBURSMENTS / WARRANTS
PAYROtt
02/09/2024 (City)
02/09/2024 (Fitel
02/23/2024 (C\tyl
02/2312024 Fne')
2/15/2024
2/2r/2024
3/6/2024
WIRES

PAYROLL TAX WIRE
5326,902.60
s351,96s.34
5602,47s.97
CITY
FIRE
Gross Pavroll s187.029.32
S 34,937.ss
5 4,9s1.61
, Ramon Lara
USDA - Water Loan
trSDA - Sewer Loan
USDA - Airport Loan
USDA - Fire Truck Loan
l, Ramon Lara, certify under penalty of perjury that the above listed accounts are correct, due and payable to the best of my knowledge.

City
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstaini
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Woodlake on the llth of March 2024,
by the following vote:

Mayor, Rudy Mendoza
Total Disbursments
Total Wire Amount Sent Out
Amount to be A d s .39
City Clerk, lrene Zacarias
9 PAYROLL....

CHECK FORM.

C-BIWEEKLY

CHECK REGISTER
RUN- 02/ 08/2024 11.39
PR311R-Vr4.22
27 PAGE 1
Paymate
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
STUB
CHECK
NUMBER
a42290
r4229r
L42292
r42293
L42294
r42295
L42296
L42291
142298
1A1ao a
L423AO
r4230L
l-42302
L42303
]42304
L42305
L42306
r42307
l-42308
l-42309
L423aO
r423LL
l-42342
r423]-3
PERTOD 1 DATTNG a/2r/2024-

DIRECT DEPOSIT IS TURNED ON
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,286.90
4 ,944 .65
2,851 .35
2,727 .86
1_,577.31
2,67_0 . 53
? ??1 AF, J t Ja
2 , 162 .50
r,457.06
L,372.5r
3,rr1-.79
2,7'71.33
1 L92 1q L
'
LJ
1, 83 I .46
a,990.24
1,901.00
2 , 582 .32
3 ,51 4 .02
7-,947 . 82
2 ,30r .57
L,820 .92
1-,862.7'7
3,289.95
2 ,32]- .39
2/03/2024 CHECK DArE 2/09/2024
CHECK

CODE SEQ
233
208
s55
2ro
206
234
225
207
l-13
229
515
5'l9
555
591
564
584
572
549
s93
594
587
590
5tt
585
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
10 PAYROLL....

CHECK FORM.

C-BfWEEKLY

CHECK REGISTER
RUN- 02/ 08/2024 11
PR3 11R-V]-4 .22

39.27 PAGE 2
Paymate
...s
STUB
pERroD I DATTNG L/2r/2024- 2/03/2024 cHECK DATE 2/os/zoz+

DTRECT DEPOSIT IS TURNED ON
CHECK
NUMBER
L423L4
r423L5
]-423r6
I423Il
I423LB
I423r9
1-42320
L4232L
r42322
I42323
I42324
1-42325
L42326
CHECK
AMOUNT
2 ,534 .58
2,r33.36
I ,8rB .97
1,800.90
L,952 .95
2,40 8.55
2 , 064 .06
7 84 .48
L ,8IA .94
2,685.00
2,372.30
2,r98.59
2 ,359 .51
CODE
578
2l-5
134
232
223
22'7
2LB
23L
230
209
2l-L
21,4
188
CHECK
SEQ
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY

TOTALS FOR CHECK FORM

NEGOTIABLE CHECKS

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
STUB
*EMPLOYEE CHECKS
*VENDOR CHECKS
*BANK CHECKS **TOTAL NEGOTIABLE CHECKS
*DIRECT
*VENDOR

DEPOSIT

DIR DEP
STUBS
STUBS
COUNTS
37 0
o
0 0

OTHER CHECKS

0.00 0.00
*MANUAL CHECKS
*CANCELLED CHECKS
0 0
O. OO **TOTAL FOR CHECK FORM

NON-NEGOTIABLE CHECKS
85,048.80

0.00 0
11 PAY INFORMATION

GROSS PAY
FEATURE DISTRIBUTION RUN_ 2/0B/2024 LL:32:L2
PR4BOR-Vl4.22
PAGE
CITY_GROSS REPORT.PAYROLL #16 1Q FY 23/24-0L/2r rO 02/a3 PAYDAY 02 202 /0e / 4 24 Paymate
PAGE TOTALS ***FEATURE TOTALS
*
EMP #
37 EMPLOYEES
CUR AI!{T CUR HRS
2322232l-52302332L4
516
221
579188555209
591-564
208 r73
565584572549593 tro/5872L0s90517
2LL
2U6
21_8586
234225
L34
23L229
518
201 37 EMPLOYEES
2 ,283 ) 4.1)
3 ,054 2 ,3a5 3 ,499 2,7904 ,5L6 2 ,825
3 ,331 3, r-68 r,9603 ,321-
2,'770 6,757 ? NA?
1 q4 q) a)1
? EO'5 ,227 ) 6a.2,
2 ,9L'72 ,498 3 ,'7 61- 2 4)9
4 ,350
3 ,486 ) 1U1 2,820
2 ,934 3 ,249 4,372
2 ,455
60ab
oa
73'705311
48 99
5462
38 511509
91 38

2.9 89851571-08
53189294
47 92
6922
16 9685808880aa
109101
9180808084808080
OU
81 AA808082
83 80aa80808380868080805280cn
80 3,063
0050
000000
50 505050000000000000000050000000000000
00 00
0009826911
o1tr
I ,12I 3 ,3'1 6
3 ,201 113,909
UUt5000000000050000000
25 113, 909.11 3 ,063 .25
12 PAY INFORMATION
o/T T-r/2 03

FEATURE DISTRIBUTION
CITY_O/T REPORT_PAYROLL #16 1.Q 2A24 Fy 23/24-01/2r TA 02/03 pAyDAy 02/A9/24

CUR AMT CUR HRS
3A2118 r,5748t_1"7 4"7
96 131
87 L4a48654't2
RUN- 2/a8/2024 rL..32:43
PR4B0R*V14 .22
PAGE I
Paymate
PAGE TOTALS ***FEATURE TOTALS *
EMP #
232223
15 EMPLOYEES
15 EMPLOYEES
492
2L8
00 50
00505050
50005000000000'750015
t6
58 2
292T
11 4
L
L4
2 3
2 36
130
3"7
0905
23 11'78
6LbU
230214
576
221
51959L584\ /1.594587590
206
s86
807A80
556L1 5
69 r37
5 7955,195.72 130.75
13 PAYROLL...

CHECK FORM
CHECK
NUMBER
L42286
I42287
a42288
]42289
...F
STUB
PERIOD
DIRECT

F-BIWEEKLY

CHECK REGTSTER
RUN- 02/ o8 / 2024 11. 3 9 .22
PR311R-VL4.22
CODE
PAGE 1
Paymate
1 DATTNG 7/2r/ZOZ+- 2/03/2024 CHECK DATE 2/0e/zOZq

DEPOSIT IS TURNED ON
CHECK
SEQ
CHECK
AMOUNT
1,339.31
r,423 .00
2 ,879 .45
1_,99 3 . 58
4052
4042
4 018
4022
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY

TOTALS FOR CHECK FORM

NEGOTIABLE CHECKS

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
STUB
*EMPLOYEE CHECKS
*VENDOR CHECKS
*BANK CHECKS
**TOTAL NEGOTIABLE
COUNTS
CHECKS
0 0
0 0

OTHER CHECKS

0.00 0.00

NON-NEGOTIABLE CHECKS
'7 ,5"7 5.34

0.00 O. OO **TOTAL FOR CHECK FORM
*MANUAL CHECKS
*CANCELLED CHECKS
*DIRECT DEPOSIT
*VENDOR DIR DEP
0 0
STUBS
STUBS
4 0
14 PAY INFORMATION

GROSS PAY

FEATURE DISTRI
FIRE_GROSS REPORT_PAYROLL #15 FY 23/24,01/2r TO A2/A3 pAYDAY BUT]ON RUN- 2/08/2024 rI:31:55
PR4B0R-V14.22
PAGE I
rQ 2424 o2/ae/24 Paymate
EMP #4022 4 EMPLOYEES
4 EMPLOYEES
1, 900 .00r ,932 .50
3 ,562 .48 ) 4t1,'7E 9,818.73
IT2 II2
80 r1-2
PAGE TOTALS 4r6 ***F'EATURE TOTALS *

CUR AMT CUR HRS
4052
40 424 018
0000000000
9,818. ?3 416.00
15 PAYROLL...

CHECK FORM
CHECK
NUMBER
I4233I
L42332
r42333
L42334
I42335
l'42336
I42337
L42338
I42339
l-42340
L4234L
142342
I42343
I42344
L42345
]42346
L42341
442348
142349
L42350
t-4235L
l.42352
I42353
1-42354
C_BTWEEKLY

CHECK REGTSTER
RUN- o2 / 22 / zoz4 J-r .36
PR311R-V14.23
CHECK
SEQ
18 PAGE 1
Paymate
c
STUB
PERIOD 2 DATING 2/04/ZOZ+- 2/L7/2024 CHECK DATE 2/23/ZOZ+

DTRECT DEPOSIT IS TURNED ON
CHECK
AMOUNT
2 ,286 .89
4 , 944 .65
2 , 857 .35
2 ,721 .87
I,46t .05
2,6a0.53
3 ,32r .46
2 ,7-62 .5O
L,451 .07
I ,37 2 .50
2,403.31
) )'7? 1A
l-,492.15
7,8-15.50
7-,990 "24
2 , 04L .57
2 ,7_05 .47
3 ,51 4 .02
2,057 .rr
aaaanr at44a.vJ
2,240.07
T,7BB.7L
1 tao otr J I L9J " JJ
2 , 094 .22
CODE
z)5
208
565
)1n
206
234
225
207
r'7 3
229
5'7 5
5t9
55s
591
564
584
5'7 2
549
593
594
587
590
577
586
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
16 PAYROLL"..

CHECK FORM
CHECK
NUMBER
I42355
l.42356
L4235'7
]42358
L42359
L42360
1-42361-
L42362
L42363
142364
L42365
L42366
142367

C-BIWEEKLY
CHECK R.EGISTER
RUN- 02/ 22/ 2024 11 . 35
PR311R-V14.23
18 PAGE 2
PaymaLe
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
ONLY
STUB
PERIOD
DIRECT
2 DATTNG 2/04/zoz+- z/tt/zoz+

DEPOSIT IS TURNED ON
cHECK DATE z/zz/zoz+
CHECK

SEQ CHECK
AMOUNT
5,934.38
L ,734 - 82
1,850.83
1,505.07
1,884.46
2,593.80
2 ,064 . O6
460.36
2 , 6L1- .93
2,685 .01
2 ,37 2 .29
. I EO '7) z , LJ J ' t
-
2,359 .51
CODE
578
2r5
L34
)-))
223
221
2r8
234
230
209
2l-L
zL+
188
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
1 STUB
TOTALS FOR CHECK FORM:

NEGOTIABLE CHECKS

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
STUB
*EMPLOYEE CHECKS
*VENDOR CHECKS
*BANK CHECKS
**TOTAL NEGOTIABLE CHECKS

CO UNT S
0 0
0 0

OTHER CHECKS

0.00 0 " 00
*MANUAL CHECKS
*CANCELLED CHECKS
0 0
O. OO **TOTAL FOR CHECK FORM
NON_NEGOTIABLE CHECKS
86, 87r.'78

0.00 *DIRECT
*VENDOR

DEPOSIT

DIR DEP
STUBS
STUBS
3'7
0 17
PAY ]NFORMATION

GROSS PAY
FEATURE DISTRIBUTION RUN- 2/22/2024 IL :26 :35
PR4B0R-Vi-4 . 23
PAGE 1
CITY_GROSS REPORT_P PaymaLe FY 23/24-02/04 TO 02AYROLL #17 1Q /L] PAYDAY 02

CUR AMT
202
/23 /
4 24
EMP #

EMPLOYEES

CUR HRS
,942 ,253,
o54
,485 nqq
8056
93 2L

69.A
92 9363
92 15
234225
]-34 23L229
578
247

EMPLOYEES
ooaa
6524
3150
53 00
0000005000
4A
00 90
L,128 ? ,n "04 11'7 )A
08726978
193
80 3,r37
223
2r5230233 2r4
516
227
579
188555
249
591564
248 r't3
555584512
qaq
593
594
,6L9 ,7r0 aqa,083 QLq
,934 ,885
98 38
5462391509
9238691585
88B380
115
808190
103
80808080
ot
80 80808086808083
50 50UU00005050
500000000000000000
50 89
2 01
l_
o13
1 2
333
3323
I
3262
322
5 223324
3 l2
2 3
4 2
AA9T'1 0
38 '7 A1
L q'7
,050,7 BI ,168 ,960 ,32r
,221 79L,820,
TT2
,16L ,34L
81 581
21-0
590511
2LL
2062L8
s86
,350 ,486
0000000050000000
0000000000
80 9'7
8080808080
8080808081
29 on
22 165600
PAGE TOTALS ***FEATURE TOTALS
*
373'I 1-1-'t ,243 .'7 I 3,r-37.90
18 PAY INFORMATION
a/T T-L/2 03
FEATURE DISTRIBUTION RUN_ 2/22/2a24 II:2f:aj
PR4B0R-V14 .23
PAGE
CITY FY 23/ -olT REPORT-PAYROLL #17 24-02/04 TO A2/L] PAYDAY rQ 2024 n) /)1. /)z- Paymate EMP # CUR AMT CUR HRS
o
3 35
L8
2322302r4
516
227
5915845935a /

EMPLOYEES
26L
138 1 ??1
70 426
887
2r9215
r51'7 46
50500050005000
51 78
5094
88 29 23 5l
54 3232
562I
2I
5 63 I1
1 11 TI2
11 005000
00 50 pAGE TOTALS ***

FEATURE TOTALS
* EMPLOYEES
4 ,5564 ,556 rr2 .50
19 PAYROLL...

CHECK FORM
CHECK
NUMBER
L42321
L42328
1 A alac,
L42330

F-BIWEEKLY

CHECK REGISTER
RUN- 02/22/2024 11.35
PR3 tlR-V14 . 23
2L PAGE L
Paymate
F
STUB
PERIOD
lJ ,L t<_L L l2 DATTNG 2/04/ZOZ+^ 2/17/2024 CHECK DArE 2/23/ZOZ+

DEPOSTT TS TURNED ON
CHECK
A]VIOUNT CODE
4052
4042
4 018
4022
CHECK
r ,356
1,406
2 ,'7 89
1,980
20 91
95 28
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
1 STUB ONLY
TOTALS FOR CHECK FORM:

NEGOTTABLE CHECKS

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
STUB
*EMPLOYEE CHECKS
*VENDOR CHECKS
*BANK CHECKS
**TOTAL NEGOTIABLE
COUNTS
LE-E,L]\>
0 0
0 0

OTHER CHECKS

0.00 0.00
*MANUAL CHECKS
*CANCELLED CHECKS
0 0
O. OO **TOTAL FOR CHECK FORM
NON_NEGOTIABLE CHECKS '7,533.40

0.00 *DIRECT
*VENDOR

DEPOSIT

DIR DEP
STUBS
STUBS
4 0
20 PAY INFORMATION

GROSS PAY
FEATURE DISTRIBUTION RUN- 2 / 22 /2024 IL :26 :L5
PR4B0R-V14.23
PAGE
FTRE.

FY 23/ GROSS REPORT_PAYROLL #I7 IQ 2024 24-A2/a4'-rA 02/r7 PAYDAY o)/23/24

CUR AMT
Paymate

EMPLOYEE NAME
FEATURE TOTALS *
PAGtr TOTALS ***
4052
40424 0184022 4 EMPLOYEES
4 EMPLOYEES
EMP # CUR HRS
416.00
1 9)) 1 ql'? tr?,
2 ,406 9,763
LI2 . AA112.00

80.00 112.00 4I6.00
5050
4B25l3
o acl a1
21 ACS FINANC
02/L5 /2024

IAL SYSTEM
1_1: Check Register
CHECK#

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-VO8 .21 PAGE 1

BANK VENDOR

BANK BANK OF THE STERRA
0 019130003340019660 01-29 4

FAMILY HEALTH CARE NETWO

ADVENTIST HEALTH PHY NET

ADVENTIST HEALTH PHY NETADVENTIST HEALTH PHY NET

VALLEY CHILDRENS MEDICAL

ADVENTTST HEALTH PHY NET
ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOC. MEDIC
ADVENT]ST HEALTH PHY NET ADVENT]ST HEALTH PHY NET A.R.E. AUTO PARTS INC AT & T MOB]LITY AUTOZONE STORE 4485

BANK OF AMERICABANK OF THE SIERRA
BEATWEAR, INC. B]G TEX TRAILER WORLD IN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE

BSK ASSOCIATES

CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UN
CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNCA TURF EQUIPMENT & SUPPCAL AG OUTHOUSESCALfFORNIA CHOICE

CALIFORNIA STATECISCO TIRES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE E.D.LS.

FOOTHILLS SUN-GAZETTE/THFRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY CO.

GIANT AUTO GROUP
GRISWOLD, LASAI,LE, COBB,bKU>5 & JIIVEI\J

HEALTH WISE SERVICES
HIGH S]ERRA LUMBER & SUP IBARRA SR/FELIPE K R C SAFETY CO., ]NC. KTWANIS OF WOODLAKE KROHNE INC L.N. CURTIS & SONS
MARTINEZ/ IGNACIOMERCED/ ELI ZABETHM]D-CAL TRANS PARTS OFFTCE DEPOT PACE SUPPLY CORPPALM OCCUPAT]ONAL MEDTCI PAPE MACH]NERY PORTERVILLE/ CITY OF

QUAD - KNOPF

DATE AMOUNT
o0]-264 002303
002303002303001989002303
00L267
002303
002303
t-4 8 l_L1_4812 L48L3 'J.48'J"414 815r481-6L48L1

15.00 180.00

49.39 15.00

40.97 30.00
100.97
02/01/24 02/07/24 02/07/2402/01 /24 02/01/2402/o7 /24 02/o7/24o2'/ o'7'/ 24o2'/ o7'/ 24o2'/ 1-5 / 24 o2/15/24 02/1-5/24 02/15/24 02/L5/24 02/L5/24 02/15/24 02/L5/2402 / 1-5'/ 24 02/15/24 02/15/2402/1,5/24 02/15/24 02/L5/24 02/L5/24 o2/L5/24 02/.Ls /2402 /.r5 /.24 02/1-5/24 02/15/2402/1-5/24o2'/ 1-5 / 24 02/1-5/24 02/15/24 02/L5/24 o2/L5/24 02/15/24 02/15/24 02/15/24 02/a5/24 02/1-s/2402/1-5/2402/1-5/24 02/15/24 02/15/2402/1,5/24 02/L5/24o2'/ r5'/ 24 02/15/24 00230200111_4
t_1
'7717777
'7r00
l-5AO73/o
48 OJ
6015
10?
LLC,
227
,632 ,2]-7 ,546o
828
84 3 ,496 200
40,1]-0 65s
4 818
48L9
4555
4556
4558 /EtrO
45604561-
6800
46 00
5938
000000
40 71
47 50
95 6325
0015
1_1
22 3
002260002069
0003510009r_s 0009s5001089
002324
001_350
00L7 48
001836000753
7 45627 45637 4564
t 4565I 4566I 45617 45681 4569745707 4571-7 45727 457314514'7 457 574576745777 45't I 145797 45801 458r1 45821 4583'7 45847 45457 45867 45877 4588 l_501_40
r ,209 269
390
L ,209 ) 1qa
89 r45
2 ,]-38 600
254
35 401-
1_7 I 3,000 110
5 ,906 '714) .7LA
300'7 49
13s
45 ,965
1-1-,934 1, l-35
781-650
001_875 000898000283
000252
0 01-7 230001-1,8 001343
000867
o02255000542
000181
002325000294oo2323
.40202
0 0L31 1000038
00206s
001_406 00L61 9
0 0115 4
000022
00 2746
0008
28 698400
A)0002
7 4589
1 45907 4591-
A A E d'
7 4593
22 ACS F 02/t5

BANKBANK
INANC/2024

IAL SYSTEM
Check Register
CHECK#
7 45947 4595
C]TY OF WOODLAKE GL54OR-VOB.21 PAGE 2
VENDOR

BANK OF THE SIERRA

RODRIGUEZ/MONNICAROY IIASTINGS
SANTA FE AGGREGATES, INCSANTOS/RAQUELSOUTHERN CALIF EDTSON COSOUTHERN TTRE MARTST .fOHN'S RIVERSTANTEC CONSULTfNG SERVI TAYLOR GROUP ARCH]TECTS UBEO WEST LLC
ULINE
WINDOWS PLUS CONSTRUCTfOWOODLAKE HARDWARE CO

BANK OF THE SIERRA

DATE AIVIOUNT
.4020L
00r21-4
00LL21
.40203
000024uuzz t5
0016050 0114 5
001599
002287
001520001637000028
?/ troo'7 46007 460t7 46027 46037 4604'7 46057 4606
r_50.00 3,250.00 285 .44

79.65 22,458 .88 469.67
375.00
9, 556 . 50 LL6,281 .60
1- ,003 .44 5,237 .50'7 ,422.79 L99.98
7 4596'7 4597
7 4598
/z+/24 '/ 24
/24 /24 '/ 24 '/ 24 '/ 24
/24
/.24/.24 /24/24
02 /.r 02/1-02/1-02/Lo2'/ L 02/t
02 /.L 02/ 1- 02/r02/1- 02/ro2'/ 1-02/L
326,902.50 ***
23 ACS F]NANCTAL SYSTEM 02/1,5/2024 11:

BANK VENDOR
REPORT TOTALS:

Check Register
CHECK#
RECORDS PR]NTED 000486
CITY OF WOODI,AKE GL54OR'V08.2]. PAGE 3

DATE AMOUNT
326
,
902 .60
24 ACS FINANC
02/1-5/2024
fAL SYSTEM 11:16:59 Schedule of Bil1s
AMOUNT ACCOI]NT NAME

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER
VEHTCLE MA]NTENANCE/OPER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPERVEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPERVEHICLE MAfNTENANCE/OPERVEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
VEH]CLE MAINTENANCE/OPER VEHICLE MA]NTENANCE/OPER

CARWASH EXPENSESSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN

VEHICLE MATNTENANCE/OPER

CONTRACTURAL SERVICES
VEHICLE MATNTENANCE/OPER *VENDOR TOTAL
CLA]M INVOICE
CTTY OF WOODLAKE GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 1-
FUND & ACCOUNT PO# F/P ]D LINE
04r1

VENDOR NAME

DESCRTPTION
A.R.E. AUTO PARTS
BRAKE PADS O2/2
FTTTTNGS 02/2O2 OIL FLTR/DRTLL
VEHICLE MATNT.

VEHICLE MAINT OVEHICLE MAINT.

SUPPLTES 02/2O2
WIPER BLADES 02orl, FTLTER 02l2 VEHfCLE MAINT O

HOSE FITTINGS OHOSE FITTINGS ORATCHET STRAP O

SPR LOCKNG PIN

VEHICLE MATNT O

HS FTTNGS/TAPE

COIL/SPRK PLG O
INC
024
4 B
0 2
0 4
0 222
0 2
0 2
vrsrT 02/ VIS]"I O2'/ VISIT 02/ VISIT O2,/ vrsrr 02/ vrsrT 02/ VISTT 02/ vlsrT o2'/ vrsrT 02/ vrsrT 02/ vtstr 02/ vrsrT 02/ vrsrr 02/ vrstT o2'/ vrsrT 02/vrsrr 02/ VISIT 02l VISIT O2l vtstr 02/ vrsrT 02/ vrsrr 02/ vrsrT 02/ VTSTT O2l vtsrT o2'/ VISIT O2l vtsrT o2'/ vrsrT 02/ vrsrT 02/ vrsrr 02/ vrsrT 02/ 94 1818
L41-1
I
47z3l1
12 270 2TI
55 050060060060060060
060060060050060060060060060060060
032
029029
o32
032
0s0
029
029
029032028o32
8r964481-97 3781-98978199388l-99398L9945
8]-997 9 82004482031-98204'1 I82054982057 0
820911
820956
82098'7
82L12382LL51
4243
44 646566
454647
67 48
4zu z4
024
244
o 43-4
0423
04620 418041_80 41-40424
04 t-1
44 71- I6
1-1
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCE INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE

INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
29 5'7
53 0381,
24 001
00100100400400400100r_00r004001062
001
001
00400100r_001001001001001001
0010010010610620630 01_029
00 000000
41-1,41-1-
41-4 4r44L8
4t_8
4r1-
21-
226I6263
032o32032o32032
o57
057
057057
0 01_0010 01_000000
0000010 01_00100000r_
00003
00003000030000300003000030000300003000030000300003
7T 2/24
2442024
2/
/22/
20 24/2'/)'/t
/22/ /22//2
8793
931_5
24 024
4 o24
39 50
91-
67 0l010101
010l_01_
42 62
46 98
057
057057057057057057057057
u5 I057
051
057
0770't 7
07'7
077077077071011011o11 ollo77011
0'7 7
077077
0'7 7
008
008008008008008008008008008008008008008008008
008008008008008008008008008008008008
008008
0s00500500500500s00500500500s00500s0050
0500500500500500500500500s00500500500500s0
0s00500s0
67 333
38 r
,
L9'7
00L49
001500 015100068
00152
00153
ADVENT]ST HEALTH PHY NET OFFICE
OFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFfCEOFFICE
OFFICEOFF]CE OFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFF]CE OFFICEOFFICEOFFlCEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFTCEOFFICEOFFICE

OFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICE
33 098455085'7
0 01-001061062063
2024
202420242024zu 2420242024202420242024202420242024202420242024 20242024
2024
2024202420242024202420242024202420242024
2024
L68784
9391
btll-868l_ l_
L7
l_5
1358
6036
o4
33 62
43 0402
0403
0404
0405041_5 04l-6041_8 042L0422
046]- 0462
o77 0 071 00"71 0 077 0 077 0 017 0
0'7'7 0 077 0 077 0
1 22
1 2
161
7 48
35 01
3 0000l101
0 3
l0
3 24
17 HEALTHHEALTHITEALTI]HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHUFAT MUHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
0002
0002
077071077017
0002
0002
0002
00002000020000200002
0002
000200020002
000020000200002
001060072041
0406o460
0412
044Lo402
0403
0404
0463
0 41-2o42904050 415
4444
0000200002
0 000030
00000
25 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 02/L5/2024 l-1: l-5:59

VENDOR NAIVIE

DESCRIPTTON
Schedule of Bil-1s

FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 2
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME PO# F/P ID L]NE

ADVENTIST HEALTH PHY NET
oFFrcE vrsrT 02/2024
OFFICE VISTT 02/2024oFFrcE vrsrT 02/2024oFFICE vISrT 02/2024 oFFrcE vrsrT 02/2024 oFFICE VISIT 02/2024
LAB/DTAGNOSTICS 02/24
LAB/DIAGNOSTTCS O2,/ 24 LAB/DIAGNOSTTCS 02/24
LAB/D]AGNOSTICS 02,/ 24 LAB/DIAGNOSTICS O2'/ 24LAB/DIAGNOST]CS 02/24 LAB/DIAGNOST]CS 02/24 LAB/DTAGNOSTTCS O2'/ 24LAB/DIAGNOSTTCS 02/24LAB/DIAGNOSTTCS 02/24LAB/DIAGNOSTICS 02./ 24LAB/DIAGNOSTICS O2'/ 24LAB/DIAGNOSTICS 02/24LAB/DIAGNOSTICS 02./ 24LAB/DIAGNOSTICS 02,/ 24 LAB/DIAGNOSTICS O2'/ 24LAB/DIAGNOSTTCS 02/24LAB /DIAGNOSTTCS O2'/ 24DR VISIT/INJCTN 2/24DR VISIT/INJCTN 2/24DR V]SIT/INJCTN 2/24 DR VISIT/ IN.TCTN 2/24DR VISIT/INJCTN 2/24DR VTSIT/INJCTN 2'/24DR VTSTT/TNJCTN 2/24DR VrSrT/TNJCTN 2'/24DR VISIT/]NJCTN 2/24 DR VISIT/INJCTN 2/24DR VISIT/INJCTN 2/24DR VISIT/INJCTN 2/24DR V]SIT/INJCTN 2/24 DR V]SIT/INJCTN 2/24 DR VISIT/INJCTN 2/24DR VISIT/INJCTN 2/24DR VISIT/INJCTN 2/24DR VrSrT/rN,lCTN 2/24 oFFrcE vrsrT 02/2024 oFFrcE vrsTT 02/2024oFFICE VISIT 02/2024 oFFrcE vrsrT 02/2024 oFFrcE vrsrT 02/2024 oFFfcE vrsrT 02/2024 oFFrcE vrsrT 02/2024 oFFrcE vrsrT 02/2024 00l0
00 011
010
2 00
19t4
0010000000000000
6 4
0000000000010
06'79
801802
L65118
L7
5120
817490
69q)
82 46
05 55
48 l_50213
223535
1_5
36z4
83 2121_
8802
39 01_1,9
45 o4
001001051062063001 o)90 01-050o72 o4t0010 01_00r00100100100100i001 0464
0462
046304L204290406o460
o472
044L0402
0403
0404
04050415
04L6
0418042r0422
046L
0462
0463
04L204290 406
0460
0472
044L0402
0403
o404
04050415
04l-6
0418 042r
01707701707707'l0110'7'70710710770110110170110'7'70'7'7071o77011o71077017077 0'7 7
071071
07'7
0'7 7
0710'7'70770'7'707707707101'70'7'7017077o71o71077
077
0'7'7
011077
o11077077Q'7 7
0000400004000040000400004000040000400004000040000400005000050000s0000s0000s0000500005000050000s000050000s000050000s0000500005 HEALTHHEALTHHEALTT{ UEAT frUHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHUEAT TUHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHUENT TUHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTI{HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTI{ INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCEfNSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE

INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE

INSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCE 0 01-0 01-0 01_0010 01_
0460
0472
044A0402
0403
0404
04050 415
000300030003
0000400004
001029001060072
04L
0 01-0 61-062063001
04l-2
0429
040604L6
0 418 042r
0422
050.0080s0.008050.008050.0080s0.008 050.008050.008 050.008050.0080s0.008050.008050.008050.0080s0.008050.0080s0.008050.008 050.008050.008
050.008050.008050 - 008
050.008
050.0080s0.008050.008
050.008
050.008
050.008050.008050.008050.008050.008050.008050.008
050.008050.008050.008 0s0.008050.008
050.008050.008050.008050.008050.008 050.0080s0.008050.008050.0080s0.008 000300030003
000000
0 0004
001
0000400004000040000400004
05 05050l070707070707
1L
31 1304
34 77
49 oo54
029
0 01-060o'72o41-0010 01_001001001001001001
00000000000000000000000000000000007
26 ACS 02/
VENDOR NA]VIE DESCRIPTIONADVENTTST HEALTH
OFFICE VfSIOFFICE VIOFFICE VIOFFICE VIOFFICE VI
OFF]CE VI OFFfCE VTOFFICE VIOFFICE VIS

OFFICE VISOFFICE VISOFFICE VIS
F]NANCIAL SYSTEM L5/2024 11:16:59 Schedufe of Bills

FUND & ACCOI'NT CLAIM INVOICE

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_VOB.21 PAGE 3
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME PO# F/P ID LINE
Sf
SISI
42 77o418
03 39
qn
090l_
08 TTT
T
02 02UZo2o202u2.
02o20202
02020202o2o202
020202o2o2o2
02020202

PHY NET
/ 2024 '/ 2024
/ 2O24/ 2o24
/ 2024 '/ 2024
/ 2024
/ 2024
/ 2024/ 2024
/ 2024 '/ 2024
/ 2024/ 2024/2024/ 2024/ 2024/ 2024
/2024/ 2024/ 2024/ 2024/ 2024/ 2024 / 2024 '/2024
/ 2o24/2o24
01 1-2
07701'7
07'70'7 7
0'/'7
017077
0'7 7
077071077
008008008008
008008008008008008
008008008008
008008008
008008008008008008
008008008008008008
008
0500500500s0050050
0500500s00s00s0
0500500500500s00s0
0s00500s00500500s0050
0500500500500s0050
050050
404
405
41_541-64L842L
422
461
001061
062
063001
029
001060
0010010010 01_ 061062
063001
029
0 01-060
6I4544
63 48
00 37
l_0855937
7806

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH *VENDOR
INSURANCB]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCE
]NSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCElNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE

INSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCETNSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCE INSURANCE]NSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCE

INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCE
TOTAL
o77071077
077o77071o71
00007000070000700007
0000700007
0422
o46L
o462
o463
04L2
o429
04060460
04'72
0 441-
0402
0403
0404
040s0 415
o4],6
0 418
0421-
o422 046r0462
046304L2
o429040604600472
0444
o4020403
008
008
SS
c
S
ITITfTITITITITIT
800000
001101
l_
3 t0a
24 L7
00100
000000
000006
4 0000
000070000700007
000070000900009
07204L
001001001001001

OFFICEOFFICEOFFICE
OFFfCEOFFTCEOFFICEOFFfCEOFFICE

OFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICE
OFFTCE
VISITVISTT VISIT VISITVfSTT VISIT V]SIT VISIT VISIT VISIT VISIT VISIT VISIT VISIT VISIT VISIT 0s0 050 050 050 0s0 050 008 008 008 008 008 008 808218021-6 223535
1536
83 272!
8802
072o4L001001001001001
00r_0 01_0 01-0010 61_o62
063001029001060072
0 41-
077077
077077 oll011077
077077o71077077071077
071071
01'7
071017
07'7017
07'7
011o11077077
017017
0000900009
000090000900009000090000900009
00009000090000900009000090000900009
0000900010000100001-000010000r_0 00010
00010000r_00001-00001_00001_0 00010
00010000100001_00001_0 000100001_0

PHYSICIAN
PHYSIC]AN PHYSTC]AN PHYSTCIANPHYSICfANPHYSICIANPHYS]CIAN PHYSICIANPHYSTC]AN PHYSICIAN PHYSICIANPHYSICIANPHYS]CIAN PHYSTCIAN

PHYSICTANPHYSICTANPHYSICIANPHYSICIAN
VISITVISTTVIS IT VISIT VIS]T VISIT VISIT
VTSITVIS IT VISIT VISIT VISIT VISIT VISIT VISIT VISIT VIS]T VTSTT 02/24o2'/ 24
02/2402/24 02/24o2'/ 2402/24 02/24 n) /)a 6z'riq 02'/24 02/24 02/24
o2'/ 24o2'/.2402/24 02/24o2'/24
0000
00000462
0463
o 41-2
0429
0405
0460
04'72 044r
008008008008008
008008008
050050
505050
50 39
01I9o4
00 000s0

0.04 050 350.10
27 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 02/L5/2024 11:16:59

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION

AT & T MOBILITY

PD CELL PHONES

PHONEPHONE

PHONEPHONEPHONEPHONEPHONES

PHONESPHONESPHONESPHONESPHONES
Schedule of Bills

AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME

TELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONE

TELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONE TELEPHONETELEPHONE *VENDOR TOTAL

UTILTTIES

OFFICE SUPPLIES
VEHf CLE MAINTENANCE/OPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE STATION MAINTENANCOFF]CE SUPPLIES TRAIN]NG EXPENSE OFFTCE SUPPLIES FIRE STAT]ON MAINTENANC FIRE STATION MAINTENANC OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE PREVENTTONOFFICE SUPPLIES F]RE PREVENTION FIRE PREVENTIONVEHICLE MA]NTENANCE/OPER TRATNING EXPENSE TRAfNING EXPENSETRAINING EXPENSETRAINING EXPENSE *VENDOR TOTAL

FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE
CfTY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 4
PO# F/P ID LINE
CITY CELL CITY CELL CfTY CELL CITY CELL CITY CELL CITY CELL CITY CELL CTTY CELL CITY CELL CITY CELL CITY CELLC]TY CELL
001001001001061062062
053004001001
062062062062004
004004004004004004
004004
18565918
9518
26 83
00T40080
499
28 l-56
28 1)20
5Z
3020
897
1 2QO
15 2/24 2/24
2/242/24 2/24 2/24 2/242'/ 24 2/24 2/24
2/24) /tL2/24
cKT 02/24
oR 02/24
02 / 2024
02/2402 / 2024o2'/ 2024
02/24 ) /aa
627 )+ o2'/ 2024
02 / 202402 / 2024 02/24 02/24
0 SsJs
S
685
2222
15 7
1537zz
45 0 26r
26L
1 LAq
04l- 10403
0404
040504r-5o 41-6
0 418
042L
0422
0461-
04620462
0463
060050060060060
050050
001-630016400164ool-6400164
001_64 00164
00L64
0016400154o 0164
00]-64 00164
1183'78
00100100r001001
56o7
9T98
49 050050060
060060060
060050060050060050060
060060060060060
060060060050050
020020020
02 020202
032032029o32032o32
02303'7 nr?
034
0s7057057057057
057
057
057057057
057
051
057057057057057
r/3 /24-2/2/24 r/3/24-2/2/24 1-/3/24-2/2/24 1/3/24-2/2/24 L/3/24-2/2/24 r/3/24-2/2/24 L/3/24-2/2/24 r/3/24-2/2/24 1-/3/24-2/2/24 7'/ 3'/ 24-2'/ 2'/ 24 L/3/24-2/2/24 L/3/24-2/2/24 L/3/24-2/2/24 0570570570570s7057
05'7
057057
057057057057057 o5l
057057057057057
o51o57
057
nrn u5 /020
o20 (\) (\
020020
0 000

AUTOZONE STORE

VEHICLE MAINT
FUEL CAP 02/2

SEALED HEAD/S

PRESSURE SENS
1J- PC OFFSET

RPLCMNT VALVE

AC SYSTEM CAP
VEHICLE MAfNT
BANK OF AMERICA UTILITIES 02/2O2

OFFICE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINT O2
OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE STN MAINT OOFFTCE SUPPLIESTRATNTNG 02/2024OFFICE SUPPL]ES FIRE STN MA]NT O FIRE STN MAINT.

OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE PREVENTION

OFFICE SUPPLIES

FTRE PREVENTION FIRE PREVENTION
VEHICLE MAINT 02
TRAINING 02/24TRIANING 02/2024

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER

SPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPERVEHICLE MAfNTENANCE/OPERVEHICLE MAINTENANCE,/OPER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/ OPER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER *VENDOR TOTAL
4485 . 02/2024
024

30.43 9.34
34 .19
54 .36 10.88
L3 .04LO.2L
64 6A
221.13
4485901-98944859041 r04485904'71-14485907 526448590"7 527 041-4
0 4110 4180462
00242001080010900010
000090000800004
o0243
0046
0047
0048004900500051
005600570058005900600061
0462
04620462
04L4
032o32
032o23
034
4485901 5934485901 894
4485908055
4 02/2
/ 202 02/2
2/2002/2
02L
o23 023 8l_ qq
75AE
lt
200
9999039572'7300
za
60 004
004004
004004
004004004004004
004004
34 90
00 9600
49 o 41,40 41-4
041-4041-404L4041404L4041-40474
o 41-4o 41-4
04l-404L4
0 41-4
04L404l-4
0 41-4
04],4 04l-4
0 41-4
060060060060060
060060050060060060
034 nt a.
041-023
041 04r n?,
037
037
037
037
00044
0004s
4 024
0242024
024
0052005300540055
00000000
00000000
MEDICAL SUPPLIES OHH FIRE STATION 02
2/ /z 00062 00063 2,632
28 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 02/L5/2024 11:15:59

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION

BANK OF THE SIERRA
AMAZON 02/2024
ADOBE 02/2024
AMAZON 02/2024
AMAZON O2'/2024
AMAZON 02/2024 DRI CRASH PLAII 02/24 sP GARADRY 2/2024
AMAZON 02/2024ADOBE 02/2024
EARTHLTNK 02/2024
DMI DELL SALES 02/24
ADOBE 02/2024AMAZON 02/2024
DMr DELL Sar,nS 02/2024
AMAZON 02/2024
AIVIAZON 02/2024AIVTAZON 02/2024AMAZON 02/2024ADOBE 02/2024AMAZON 02/2024 AMAZON 02/2024AI\,IAZON 02/2024 DMI DELL SALES O2/2O24
HOME DEPOT CREDIT 2/24HOME DEPOT 02/2024
HOME DEPOT 02/2024
LOWES 02/2024'LOWES O2/2024
AMAZON 02/2024AMAZON 02/2024AtvtAzoN 02/2024 DRl UPRTNTNG 02/2024 CHEWY 02/2024scoRE o2'/ 2024cosrco 02/2024sPoTrFY 02/2024RrTE ArD 02/2024 Schedule of Bills
A]VIOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
52 o
289
94 WOODLAKE STUDIO

SPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN

WOODLAKE STUDIO

BASKETBALL EXPENSES

OFFICE SUPPLIESWOODLAKE STUDTO

WOODLAKE STUDIO
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OFFICE SUPPLIESSPEC]AL DEPARTMENT EXPEN SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN

PARKS AND REC EXPENSES

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN

PARKS AND REC EXPENSES

BASKETBALL EXPENSES

WOODLAKE STUDIO

WOODLAKE STUDIO
CONTRACTURAL SERVfCES
OFFTCE SUPPLfES

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN

OFFICE SUPPLIES

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN CR CARWASH EXPENSES
WOODLAKE STUDfO

CARWASH EXPENSES

WOODLAKE STUDIO

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENCONTRACTURAL SERVICES CONTRACTURAL SERV]CESCONTRACTURAL SERVICES

BASKETBALL EXPENSESWOODLAKE STUDIO

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN

WOODLAKE STUDIO

PARKS AND REC EXPENSESPARKS AND REC EXPENSES

OFFICE SUPPLIES

SPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN

BASKETBALL EXPENSESBASKETBALL EXPENSESBASKETBALL EXPENSESBASKETBALL EXPENSESBASEBALL/SOFTBALL EXP

BASKETBALL EXPENSESBASKETBALL EXPENSES

FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 5
PO# F/P ID LINE
aao aA
T a oo
L84 .86
13 1 ) L1
684
00180001-81-0018200r_83 00184
001-8500186
L799
3927
9990
75043t
010593t9
001001001
0010 01_001001001001
0010 01_0 01-00100100r_ 001
0 01-
00100r001001
0010010 01_0 01-0010 01-0 01_0 01_
00r_ 001001
062
001
0010 01_
0406
041-l042r
o4060 421-04l- 0
0406
0405
0402
0 410
0403
0402042r
0403
042L
o 421-
0406
541-
029029 54ro44o23EA1541-
029o23029029042
029
042
044
541541028
023029o23
575"7
5757AI51575'l
5'7
057
057
057057057057
057057
057
057057
051057
057
05'7
057
05'l
057
0s7
080080060
060060060060060080060
080060060060060060060060
080060060
029
050 54!0s0 \41
029 n)9
o29
080060060080060060
080080050
060060050060060
060060
0 0000000
00057
05'7
057057
1_9 t6
t_51-964
2,O65 153 o406
04t-0041- 00 410041_00 410
04230406
o423
2L
99940989
44 L6
51-98
z3
060060060
060060060060
o51
057057
057
0018700188
0018900r_90 00r-91
00r92
001930 01940019500196
84 9
23 34
1-,643
225
904
2L6
1583
LI4
L46
'77
2'7 4
91-
6 ,359 2,7]-810
8 r73
59 82 4to
363243471
238
55 1-1
2r2
t_ 15188
44 1501
/h
22 5163
98 342327
63 0406
041-804220422041-1
0 41104110 421-04060403
o402
040204060424042L
o462o462o 421-0 421-
0 421-
042L042L 042r0421-
028
Q28
028
044
EA1
029029
02954l042042
023029044o44044044
045
044044
0 01-9700198001990020000201
00202
00203
00204
00205
0020600207
00208oo209
002100021-l002r2
00213
0021-4
00215
002L6002]-7 002180 02).9 002200022ro0222
00223
oo224oo225
00226
o0227
01 0101
0010010010010
000 01-0 01-
001001001001
060080060
060060060
057057057
057057057
l_3
81 2'714
oz93L674
99 69
WDLK PTZZA FCTRY 2/24 06RTTE AID 02/2024
AMAZON 02/2024
HOBBY LOBBY 02/2024 oFFrcE DEPOT 02/24
DOLLAR GENERAL 02/24VISUAL INK O2/2O24
DTCKS SPORTfNG GD 2/24
sP TODO BALLOONS 2/24
5t
5'75'75'757
00000
STAPLES 02/2024 vrsuAl rNK'02/2024scoRE 02/2024scoRE 02/2024 o57 00228 o51 00229
29 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 02/15/2024 l-1:16:59

VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPT]ON
BANK OF THE SIERRA scoRE 02/2024
AMAZON 02/2024
AMAZON 02/2024
scoRE 02/2024
ADOBE 02/2024
LOWES O2'/2024GALLS O2'/2024
EBAY 02/2024
PARTS PEOPLE 02/20

DICKS SPORTING GDS

LEVATA ID PRODUCTS
BEATWEAR, INC. Z. FLEEMAN UNIFORM
A.MARTINEZ UNIFORM
PD EQU]PMENT 02/24 PD EOUIPMENT O2/2O
G.MENDOZA UNIFORM
s. LoPEZ lrNrFoRM 2/
B.MTLLTGAN UNIFORM
A.PRIETO UN]FORM 2 A. JENKINS TIN]FORM C.KA]OUS UNIFORM 2 72Ll_l_1
54 34
206
:,84
22 ,21-1_
90 4836
909955I7 o42L 0 411
041_1
04t-1o42t0 411-
044
o42
042
o44029074
028028
028
o44
o29
0 421-
042L 042I 042r0 415
42))
91-
6/L2

AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
BASKETBALL EXPENSES OO1.

PARKS AND REC EXPENSES OO1
PARKS AND REC EXPENSES OO1
BASKETBALL EXPENSES OO1
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1
WOODLAKE STUDIO OO1
CONTRACTURAL SERVTCES OO1CONTRACTURAL SERV]CES OO1 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES OO1 BASKETBALL EXPENSES OO1
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1 *VENDOR TOTAL

UNIFORM ALLOWANCEUNIFORM ALLOWANCE

CONTRACTURAL SERVICES

TINIFORM ALLOWANCE

UNIFORM ALLOWANCEUNIFORM ALLOWANCEUNIFORM ALLOWANCE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCEUNTFORM ALLOWANCE *VENDOR TOTAL
Schedule of Bi1ls
CONTRACTURAL SERVfCESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICES *VENDOR TOTAL FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM ]NVOICE
44L1-47 54
1018 71
aJr02964
AHO3105AHo3481AHO3664

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 6
PO# F/P TD LINE
0023000231_ 0023200233
060
060
o51
057057
057
057057057
057
057057
057
028
028
011011011
011011011-
060060060
060060060060
050060
0500s0060
0600500500s0
0s00500s0
00234
00235
00236
1,9 00231
950886
48 0?/ 2/2
2/24
/24 2/24/24
00238
00239o0240 24
4 2/24 2/24
242/202424
s00.00207 .99
86 .19

86.'79
s00.00
499.06
500.00500.00166.00500.00
3 ,546 .63
0010010 01_0 01_001
00r_0 01_ 001001
001
0411041_1_0 411
0 41104110 4110 4110 41-1-
8455
8491-84928493
8s06
8523
8529
8531
85468547
057
057057
057
057
051
057057
Q51
057
0007900078
0007000071
Q001 l
00076
00075
o007 4
00073
00012
0 4110 411 011_ 011
BTG TEX TRAfLER WORLD IN
COUPLER SNAPPER PIN 2/24

BOYS & GTRLS CLUB OF THE
DEC. SALARTES 02/24
BSK ASSOCTATES BACTI 02/24

WEEKLY EFFLUENTWEEKLY EFFLUENT
GENERAL EDT 02/

CA STATE DISBURSEMENT UN
EMPLEE W/HLDNG 02/2024EMPLOYEE'W/HLDNG 2/24

CA STATE DISBURSEMENT IIN
EMPLEE W/HOLDTNGS 2/2024
CA TURF EQUIPMENT & SUPP D O T REACHER MDL 2/24
9 .18 SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO]..0418 .060.O29

1.1. , 934 .1,6 SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OOT .041"2 . 060 .029 188 ]20 1-20 505050
0050
063062
062
063
0463
04620462
0463
0s7 00139057 00158
05'l057
057 001_16
057 00001_
701
1"36
02/2402/24
2024
057
057057
05'7
028
028028
o2a
060060060060
0 011_ 0
0000s0016700165
1 430.14
398.54
828 .68

84.00 21-6.50
GARNISHMENT OF WAGES WIT OO1
GARNISHMENT OF WAGES WTT OO]. *VENDOR TOTAL
00000000
200200
033033
FEBRUARY 2024FEBRUARY 2024
FEBRUARY 2024
620033
0 0118 oo24r
GARNTSHMENT OF WAGES WIT OO1. OOOO.2OO. O33
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OOL.O421..O6O.O29
30 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
02/15 /2024 11 :16 :59

VENDOR NAIVIE
DESCR]PT]ON

CA TURF EQUIPMENT & SUPP
HNDA ELECTIC STRT 2/24

CAL AG OUTHOUSES
RENTAL 2 TJNI'IS 2/24
CALfFORNIA CHOICE

CALIFORNIA STATE
EMPLEE W/HLDNGS 02/24
C]SCO TIRES FLAT REPATR 02/2024

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
BLD ALCHL ANALYSIS 2/24
AMOUNT
3,279.963
,
496 .46
655.38160.00
140.00

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEAI,THHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH *VENDOR

INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCE]NSURANCE]NSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE

INSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE

INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE

INSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCE
TOTAL
04r_4.050 0000.200

MARCHMARCH

MARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCH

MARCHMARCHMARCHMARCH

MARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCH

MARCHMARCHMARCHMARCH
MARCH

MARCHMARCHMARCHMARCH

MARCHMARCHMARCHMARCH
057
057
05'7
057 001-17057 00138
057 00096
Schedule of BiIIs

ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OOL.O42I.060.O29 *VENDOR TOTAL CLAfM INVOICE
62L336
4298

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 1
Po# F/P ]D LINE
057 00113
2OO. OO SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 001..0424.060.029 057 001s4 crTY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CITY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CITY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CITY EMPLOYEES 02/24 crTY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CITY EMPLOYEES 02/24 cfTY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CITY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CITY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CITY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CTTY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CITY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CITY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CITY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CITY EMPLOYEES 02/24 crTY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CITY EMPLOYEES 02/24 CfTY EMPLOYEES 02/24 crY rNS w/H EMPLEE 2/24 PD EXPENSE 02/2024
FIRE EXPENSE 02/2024FD INS W/H EMPLEE 2/24
394304
1 ,282 8, 68s 6,337
2856s0
55 8
60 3,500
a0 ,736 4 ,334 505 40,7L0
l_90
547
513224
529
356
4I
74 44
56 10B13839
4L
35))
94 72
091589
o 4n)0403
0404
0405041_ 5
04]-6
0 4180 421-0422
046L
o462
0500s0
050050050050050
20242024
202420242024202420242Q24
20242U 242024202420242024
2024202420242024
2024
000390003900039
000390003900039000390003900039
000390003900039000390003900039
00039000390003900040
00041
00042
00043
001001
00100100r"001001
001001051062063
008008008008008
008
00803 t_
057
057
057
o5l057
050050050
o57057057
o57057057057
057057057057
0570570510510s7
057057057057057
05'l
057
L,202
008008008008008008
008008008008008
008008031
050050050050050
0500500s0200050
050050
0s0050050050050
050050
o463
04]-2 0429
0405
001
o29
001050
L6
00 z3
655659
3021-6L
1-283
90 072
04]- WTTHHEL OOl
0 01_004
WITHHEL OO4
o460
04'72
o44r
00000 411 202
202202
202420242024
4 44
GARN]SHMENT OF WAGES WIT OO1
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 062
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES OO1
0000o462
0411
200
060
060
033
028
028
FEBRUARY 2024
147 3
1 r0522
E.D.I.S.

EMPLYEESEMPLYEES

EMPLYEESEMPLYEESEMPLYEESEMPLYEESEMPLYEES

EMPLYEESEMPLYEES

RTREESRTREESRTREESRTREES

RTREESRTREESRTREESRTREESRTREES
HEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

INSURANCE
INSURANCE]NSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCE]NSURANCETNSURANCE
&&&
&&&&&&
6 161-6
7 r'l
l_ 1-
39 1-2
9 001001001001001
001001001001
0403
0404
0405041_50 41-6
0 418
042L
0422
008008008
008008008008008008
2024
2024202420242024
2024
0 0119
0011_9001-190 011- 9001-l_90 01190 01190 0119
00119
) /)a 1'tZi2 /24 ) /)a 2/24
2/?,42'/ 24 2/24 2/24
30 8410
0402
31 ACS FINANC 02/L5/2024 ]AL SYSTEM 11:16:59
RTREES

RTREESRTREESRTREESRTREESRTREESRTREESRTREES
Schedule of 811l-s

CLAIM INVOICE

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 8
FUND & ACCOUNT PO# F/P ID LINE
012 .0472
041, .044L
0120 41_

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION
E.D.I.S.

EMPLYEES &EMPLYEES &EMPLYEES &EMPLYEES &EMPLYEES &EMPLYEES &

EMPLYEES &EMPLYEES &EMPLYEES &

PD EXPENSE

AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME

ADMINADMINADMTNADMINADMINADMIN

ADMINADMINADMINADMTNADMIN
ADMINADM]N ADM]NADMTN

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHI{EALTHHEALTH *VENDORHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHT{EALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
INSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCETNSURANCEfNSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCE

INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCE

INSURANCEINSURANCE
TOTAL

TNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE

INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE

INSURANCEINSURANCE
057057057057
057057057
057
0 0110 0110 0110 0110 011-
00]-2
000000000000
0000
077
017011077
2 /242'/24 2/24 2/24 2/24
2/242 /242'/242'/ 24
4I
282206
0 9
2 01
352

MARCHMARCHMARCH

MARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCH

MARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCH

MARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCH

MARCHMARCH
202420242024
20242024202420242024
202420242024202420242024
20242024202420242024202420242024
2U 242024202420242024
20242024
1262
24 80
21 L1I4
28 95000048
03 32
0232
/5
0'7
0t0600
o61-
062
063001029001050072
041-
001004001001
001
o46r0462
0463
0 41-2
04290406o460
04720 441-
0 411_ 04L4
0402
0403
0404
0405
0 415o4L6041- 8
0421, o422
0 461_ 0462
045304]-2 04290406
0 460
0500500500500500s0
0s00500s00500s0
0s00500500500s00500s0
008008008008008008
008008008008008008
008008008008008
057
057
05'7
057057057057
057
057057
0 01-22
00L22
0072200]-22 00r2200r22
00122
00r2200722 00r22
0 01,22
057057
057
057
057
057
057057
057
057057
008008008008008008
008008008008008
008
008008008008008008
008
050050050050050
0500s00500s00s0
050
0500500500500s0
050
0 01_00100r001001001
06 r062063001o29001
060
3l59
59256l_
41-
3845
2'72L
8802
39 011-9
45 0 0110 011001_l0 011
o999
oo99
9 0122222
2I
4 2/24
RTREES
02 / 202 FIRE DEPT EXPNSE
ADMIN O2l
ADMIN 02lADMIN 02,/
202420242024 )or4
1-28
000
000100
t10'7000
000 1 )o9
00120 0120 012 oot2
001-20012
0 012
00L2
0000000000000000
000000000000000000000000
00000000
2024
20242024202420242024
20242024
02/ 02/ 02/ 02/
o2'/
02/ 02/ 02/ 02/02/ 02/ 02/ 02/ 02/
02/
20242024202420242024
2024

FAMILY HEALTH CARE
MEDICAL SERVICESMEDICAL SERVICESMEDTCAL SERVICESMEDICAL SERVfCESMEDICAL SERVICES MEDICAL SERVICESMEDfCAL SERV]CES MEDICAL SERVICESMEDICAL SERVICESMEDTCAL SERVfCESMEDICAL SERVICES MEDICAL SERVICESMEDICAL SERVfCESMEDICAL SERVICESMEDICAL SERVfCESMEDICAL SERVICES

MEDTCAL SERVICESMEDICAL SERVICES
0010010 01_001001001001
0010010 61-
0402
0403
0404
0405041_ 5
041-6
041_80 421,o422 046r
0462
0463 o4r2
0429
0406
0460
0472 044r
0500500s0050
0500500500s00s0050050
050
008008008008
008008008008008008
008
NETWO
02/2402/2402/24
02/2402/2402/2402/2402/2402/24
02/24 02/2402'/ 24 02/24o2'/24 02/2402/24
02/2402/24
0000000
000
64 0
000
00000000
2235
071
07'7
077077077071
07'7
07'7
0'7 7
077o17071077o'7'7
11t1111
11111
1II111
Jf
15 3624
83 04
06206300r_ 029
0 01_ 060

0.04 32

ACS FINANC
02/1-5/2024
IAL SYSTEM 11:16:59 CITY OF WOODLAKE GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 9

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION
FAI'{ILY HEALTH CARE NETWO
Schedule of Bills
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAIqE FUND & ACCOUNT

15.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
269 .40 SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1. 04O5 .060.029

CLAIM INVOICE
218495C9 - 0057
42'7 3't 6
4273'7 6
6227 r66230L2
L401-82Lt 4331
so00026623
1/24-2/ 4/2024
6L'7 98
PO# F/P ID LTNE
FOOTHILLS SUN_GAZETTE/TH cuP EXTENSTONS 2/24

FRUIT GROWERS SUPPLY
P]PE /ADAPTER/ ELBW ADAPTER 02/2024
couPLER/PVC 02/24

MECHANICS GLOVES
SAFETY GLASSES O2l
GAUGE PRESS O2/2O2
BOX VALVE ROTIND 02
057 00029
co.
2/24

COUPLER/PTPE

PIPE/ COUPLER
COI]PT,ER O2 /2SPARK PLUG O
/2o '/20
o24
051
057057057057
o51
05'7
o57
057
057o51
063063001o62001
063001
029
063063063
7I69
23 875135
42 1A
22 69
L'l
02/24
24244
/24
2424
1-L6
l_5181l_
5 30I6
85 0463o463
o462
042r0463
0 4060429
04630463
o463
060060060060060060080060060060060
029029029029029029
54L029
029
029
029
9243L40L92431-45792431-4669243r5669243231 1_ 92433]-06 92433256924331 20 9243532L92435435
92436635
00L2600L27
001-28
00t29
0013000131
04L32
00133

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECTAL DEPARTMENT
SPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECfAL DEPARTMENT

WOODLAKE STUDIO

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT
SPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECIAL DEPARTMENTSPECIAL DEPARTMENT *VENDOR TOTAL

EXPENEXPEN

EXPENEXPENEXPENEXPENEXPENEXPENEXPENEXPEN
GROUP
02 / 2024o2'/ 2024
LADE 02/2024) /)A)L
001340013s00136
o2o2
o24
00002000030 011200157
4243
01 6L
4'7
32 47
10 390315 3t5al o239 1 'nq202 )n)
2 ,394
060060060060
032032032o32

GIANT AUTO

SERVICESSERVICESSENSOR/BSENSOR O
GR]SWOLD, LASALLE, CITY CLERK O2l2 CITY COUNCIL 02 CITY MANAGER 02 CITY MANAGER 02

PLANNING DEPT O
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER 062.0462VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER 063 . 0463 VEHICLE MA]NTENANCE/OPER OO1. 0411 VEHICLE MATNTENANCE/OPER OO1. 0411 *VENDOR TOTAL COBB
057057
05"1
057057057v3 t057
051
4 2
2024
/)a
500000505050
LEGAL SERVICESLEGAL SERVICESLEGAL SERVfCESLEGAL SERVICESLEGAL SERVICES *VENDOR TOTAL 0402
04620462
060060060060
060
o25o25o25025o25
L] 52 t-7531-154I1 541755
67 810
1 11)

89.95 L45 .63
, 124 'q
600.00

96.35 RETAINERETAfNERETAINERETAINERETAINE
0001500015000170001800019
001001001o62062
0402
04r_0

GROSS & STEVENS
FRNT WHEEL ALIGNMNT 2/24

HEALTH WISE SERVICE
SHARPS KIOSK O2/2

HIGH SIERRA LUMBER & SUP
wooDLAKE STUDTO 02/24

IBARRA SR/FELIPE
CLEAN BATHROOMS 2/24
K R C SAFETY CO., TNC. SUPPLTES 02/2024
S
024

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN

CONTRACTURAL SERVICESSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
001o62001001001
0 4110462a42L
042L
o422
060
060
060060060
o32
029
029
028o29
057057057057
057
000060003000013001_11-00011
33 ACS FTNANCIAL SYSTEM a2/15/2024 11:l-5:59
VENDOR NA]VIE DESCRIPTION
K R C SAFETY CO., TNC.

MANHOLE COVER 02/2024

KIWANIS OF WOODLAKE
FEB DUES 02/2024

KROHNE INC
SUPPLTES WWTP 02/2024
L.N. CURTIS & SONS
FrRE GEAR 02/2024
MARTINEZ/ IGNACfO
DEED OF TRUST 02/24
MERCED/ ELI ZABETH wrR DEP RFND 02/2023

MID-CAL TRANS PARTS
PD CHEVY TAHOE 02/24

OFFICE DEPOT
DATE STA}{P 02/2024 BOX/DESKPAD 02/2024LEGAL CLEAR TABS 02/24DTVTDERS 02/2024 CREDIT PLANNER 02/2024
PLANNER 02/2024
uElnrD Aa /aAa A
i;iFiF7eilfi. fr"/ ?incrp z / z + SPNGE SCRUB 02/2024 cLrPS/HoLE pNcA oz/zoz+ TAPE DISPENSERS 02/24RFLL INK/DTE STMP 02/24

ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOC
OFFICE VISIT O2
OFFICE VISIT O2OFFICE VIS]T O2 OFFICE VfS]T O2 OFFICE VISTT O2 OFFICE VISIT O2OFFTCE VISIT O2OFFICE VISIT O2OFFICE VISIT O2 OFFfCE VISIT O2OFFICE VlSIT O2
OFFICE VISIT O2OFFICE VTSIT O2
CITY OF WOODLAKE Schedule of Biffs GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 10

AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FTIND & ACCOUNT
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OOI.A422 *VENDOR TOTAL
CLAIM INVOICE PO#
626L65245
sor / L40925
790006361 CRESTWOOD278 N. PALM #B
J0227 30
F/P ID
057
057
o51057057057057
LINE
0009700020
0 01-620024400014
0016000069
057 00178 057 00170
0000800008
8015
L51
254
001062004
086001001
0403
o462o414
03860000
047r
060060
060060000200
060
029
038
029
0s8
95L
034
032
3s.00
40r.21
r7 I .46
3,000.00
110.08
5 ,906 .28

MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN

FIRE GEAR
O4_STBG_1944 PROGRAM INC

UTILITY DEPOSITS

VEHICLE MATNTENANCE/OPER
22 AO'7016
20)a
34 ].95
1t_
83599I6487CR
25 54
9895
001001001001001001
0010010 01-0 01-0 01-0 01-
0 4100 41104100 41004r-00 4100 4100 4100 410
0 4100 410041-0
34439561200r3 4'7 8221-59 0 0L
348435605001_ 348439396001_ 3487 98469001-
3488461 59001,348847119001_3 49 61-846 0 00r
349621259001350437360001350437403001351-992988001-
7374
1568691L12761l79

OFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICE
OFFICEOFF]CE OFFICEU.T T -L L.LOFFICEOFFICEOFFICEOFFICE *VENDORHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH SUPPLIESSUPPLfESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIES

SUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIES TOTAL

INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE

INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCE 060
060060050060050050050060
023023
023023023023
0 01-0010 01-001001001001
001001001
051
057
05'7
057
057057
057
057051051
060050
050
023023023o23o23o23
MEDIC
0 01-0010010010 01_0 01-
061-
24 45
l-8
69 96
41 39
04 46
666L
120
80 1-64 '774
202420242024202420242024
20242024242420242024
84 98
5358l_1
2024
2Q24
0 2
2 I
2 1115
4029
0 001
001001
0620530 01_
0402
0403
0404
040504 t-5
0416
0 4180 42L0422o46Lo462
o463 04r2
0500500500s00500s0
0s0050050050050050050
008008008008008008
008008008008008008008
07'l017071011011
07'7
077
077077o71071 0tl071
0000800008
000080000800008000080000800008000080000800008
34 ALb
02/

VENDOR NAME

DESCRTPTION

FINANCIAL SYSTEM
L5 /2024 11 : 16 : 59

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 11
A]VIOUNT
Schedu]e of Bills
ACCOTINT NAME FT]ND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE

ORTHOPAEDIC AS
OFFICE VISITOFFICE VISITOFFICE VfSIT

OFFICE VISITOFFICE VISIT

PACE SUPPLY CORP
SUPPLTES 02/2024

PALM OCCUPATIONAL
HEALTH SCREEN 02
SOC. MEDIC
02 / 2024a2 / 202402 / 202402 / 2024
02 / 2024

INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE

INSURANCEINSURANCE
TOTAL
33 0330
68 '75
43 80o280
20 130
00 100
04 91
n)q001060
072041
0429
04060 460
04720 441-
050
050050050050
008
008008008nne

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTH *VENDOR
01'7011011
0'7 7
0'71
0000800008000080000800008
2,146.84 SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 062 0462.060.O29
3OO. OO TRAINING EXPENSE 004 04r4 . 060 .031
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES O62.0462.060.028SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN O62.0462. O6O.029 *VENDOR TOTAL L9923L4r321-r4]-4
]-3684931-50 47 327
202401292447
291 MISSION CT
LL2523-L2057 1 28
165 N. PEPPER
057 00166

PAPE MACHINERY

DIAGNOSE ENG CODES
SNAP RrNG 02/2024
MEDICI
/ 2024
2/24 057 057
0s7 00095
057 00140
057 00159
057 00028
051 00123
057 00161
14r
7 149
0001-200137
001-04001030 0101

PORTERVILLE/ CITY OF
ANIMAL CONTROL 02/24 135.00 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 001.0411.060.028 QUAD - KNOPF WDLK GAS STN 2/24
GREENWOOD SBDVSN 2/24H]LLSIDE ESTATES 02/2 ANTLP CRK PARK 02/24 CAJON ROUNDABOUT 2/24
CNCRD EAST EXT PH2 2/,
MLBRY&NRNJO RNDABT 2/
GENERAL SERVICES 2/24
JACK,S GAS S'rN 2/24 Grs REPOSITORY 02/2O2
GENERAL SEF'VICES 2/24
MOBILE HOME PARK 2/24
MEDICAL CLINIC 02/202
24 .A
955
41-2
2 ,7 01- 1 1.1)
? 2tr2
810
2L ,22r 4'7 9
1 1-2
9 ,03r ) )?q
561 ) 1A'7
40 00599l800565
001402
001
001001001 o)t
001
023
001001001
0010010 01_
04L5
o4L6
04l-6
0 41-6
04L6
o4L6
r22033r22034
L22035L22036]-22038 r22039
L22040L22066122061r22069L220'7 0
L2201 LL22L02
000810008000102
00082001000009900098
00106001-0500107

CONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICES

ANTELOPE CREEK PARK
CONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERV]CESCONTRACTURAL SERVICES CONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERV]CES *VENDOR TOTAL 057
057
057051
057
057057v) I057
057057057
o51
028028028539028
o28o28
028028028028
060060060
080149060 75r060
060060060
0 41-6
0416
0 41-60 4070590o416
0590
44 060.028050.028
45 ,965
RODRIGUEZ /MONNfCA
WTR DEP REFUND 02 / 2024

ROY HASTINGS
WDLK HOMETOWNS 02/2024
SANTA FE AGGREGATES, INC FrLL SAND 02/2024
SANTOS/RAQUEL wrR DEP RFND 02/2024
3,250.00
1s0.00
285 .44
UTILITY DEPOS]TS OO1. OOOO.2OO. O34
CONTRACTURAL SERV]CES OO]. .O402.060. 028
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OOT,O424.O6O.O29
19 .65 UTILITY DEPOSITS OO1. OOOO.2OO - 034
35 ACS F]NANCIAL SYSTEM 02/15/2024 11:16:59

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION

SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO
MANZANTLLO LF't STN 2/24
oRCHARD A2/2024
CTY ADMN BLDNG 2/24
WATER DEPT 02/2A24
MArNT DEPT 02/2024
PARKS DEPT 02 /2024SEWER DEPT 02/24
AIRPORT DEPT 02/24
SUBDVSN LIGHTING 02/24
STREETS 02/2024
ORCHARD 02/2024ORCHARD 02/2024
2L6 E.NARANJO 02/2024

SOUTHERN TIRE MART
MULE TIRES 02/2024

ST JOHN'S RIVER
ASSESSMENT NO 729 2/2024
STANTEC CONSULT]NG SERVT
SEWER COLLECTION 2/24

TAYLOR GROUP ARCHITECTS
WOODLAKE CIV]C CN'TR 2/24 WOODLAKE C]VIC CNTR 2/24
UBEO WEST LLC CITY PRINTER 02/2024 PD PRINTER 02/2024
Schedule of Biffs
CONTRACTURALCONTRACTURAL *VENDOR TOTAL
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN *VENDOR TOTAL CfTY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.2]. PAGE T2
A}IOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 063
I ,64

ORCHARD EXPENSES

UTILITIESUTILITIESUTILITIESUTILITIES
UT]LITIES UTILIT]ES UTILITIESUTILITIES

ORCHARD EXPENSESORCHARD EXPENSES
UTILITIES *VENDOR TOTAL
6,LL4
22,458
469 .6'l
J /f . UU
9,556.50
CIVIC CENTER CIVIC CENTER *VENDOR TOTAL
001001
063001001
2L
r'1
99 53
oa
80 80
60 8I
3 8
988
qa 1z?
58,143 L16,28'7
1 90
4 ,8948
nnnr?,
00024
000310003200033
9869
9281880131
46 88
062 04r
029
0 01-o62062
004
0463
0 418 042r
o462o44r
0429
o422o46204620 41-4
o29
046021-02L
o21-
021- 02r
021- 02r o2r046046 o2r
o51
057
057057
057
o57
057
000380015500155
00245
FLIND & ACCOUNT CLA]M INVOICE
1240003814
IT25218 518 5
1'772
'7'7'72
t1L1
PO# F/P ID LINE
057057057057
057
057
o463
042L0 410
060
060060
008008
008008008008
060
060060050
060060060
060060060
050
0500s00s00500s0
0s0050050050
00034000350003600037
44 1-1 4
L23
8'7
86 AEE
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 062.0462.O64.029
ORCHARD EXPENSES OO1. O42]. .060.046
CAPITAL EXP - INFRASTRUC 062.0462.080.053
057 00007
655.3s348.09
L ,003 .44
52II9L4I1-
52LL9L4LL SERVICES SERVICES
396s9803965980
0406.080.542 0ss0.080.542
0 0 1 . 0 4 1 0 . 0 6 0 . 0 2 I
0 0 1 . 0 4 l- 1 . 0 6 0 . 0 2 8
AL'A AAA A)9 o42r .060 . o29
00100r001
00r057 00114
057 00025
057 00025 o57 00027
057 00021 051 00022
a57 00124 057 001_25 ULINE

VALLEY CHILDRENS MED
PHYSICIAN VISIT O2
PHYS]CIAN VISIT O2 PHYSICTAN VISIT O2
PHYSICIAN VISIT O2PHYSICIAN VTSIT O2PHYSICIAN VISIT O2
PHYSICIAN VISIT O2
PHYSICfAN VISIT O2PHYSICIAN VISlT O2PHYSICIAN VISIT O2
SAND BAGS 02/2024
MOPS/BUCKETS 02/2
4 ,318 859
5 ,231
1-238
50 024
CAL
2424
I
0000
l0
2 00
001001001
0010 01-
45 98
97 42
00 612'7
14 5/
o404
0405
0 415o4L604l- 8o42r0422
0 461-
011071
0770170'71071o710'7'7
017017
000060000600005
000060000600005000060000600006
00006

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTH
fNSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEfNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE

INSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
0402
0403
008008
008008
24 001001001
00106 t_
36 ACS FTNANCIAL SYSTEM 02/15/2024 11:l-6:59

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION

VALLEY CHILDRENS MED
Schedule of Bills

FIIND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE
34672
C]TY OF WOODLAKE GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 13
PO# F/P ID LINE
o77
I CA.L

AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
1-6 44
0004
PHYSICfANPHYSICIANPHYSICTANPHYSICIANPHYSICIAN
PHYSIC]AN PHYS]CIAN PHYSICIAN
VlSIT VISIT VISIT VISIT
VISTT V]SIT VISTT VISIT

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH *VENDOR
INSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCE INSURANCE

INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
TOTAL
029001060072
o 41-
04r2
0429040504600472 044I
000500060006
00086000870008800089
02o202020202
0202
24242424
242424
co 2/24
) /)L ) /ta1,'/ zoza,
2 / 20242'/20242 / 20242 / 20242 / 2024 2/24 2/24
2'/ 24
0462
0463
062
06300r_
1-2
19 4001000
40 9
6 1a
1l27
008008008008008
008008008
034034
034
034034
050050050050050
050050050
060060060060
060060
004004004004004004
004004004
004
53z)I2
01t-1
9'789a123
101018L939633t ?o
000000
0 '71
t71l7'71'77'7
11 057057
05105'7057
057
057057057057057057
0000
0000
0006
0006000600060006
0008300084
0008s00090
00091
00092
0009300094

WINDOWS PLUS CONSTRUCTTO
CLEAR MTRROR 02/2024 7,422.79 WOODLAKE STUDIO 001 . 0406 . 080 .541 057 00141

WOODLAKE HARDWARE

STATION MAINT O

STATION MAINT OSTATION MAINT O

STATION MAINT OSTATION MAINT O
STATIOM MAINT OSTATION MAINT OSTATION MAINT OSTAT]ON MAINT O STATION MAINT O STAT]ON MAfNT O STATION MAINT O
FIRE STATION FIRE STATION CR FIRE STATION FIRE STATION CR F]RE STATION FIRE STAT]ON FIRE STAT]ON FIRE STATION FIRE STATION FIRE STATTONFIRE STATION F]RE STATION *VENDOR TOTAL MAINTENANCMA]NTENANCMAlNTENANCMAINTENANCMAINTENANC
MAINTENANCMAINTENANCMAINTENANCMA]NTENANCMAINTENANCMAINTENANCMAINTENANC 004
004 04]-4 0 41-4
04L4044404]-4 04]-4
0 41"4
0444
04L4
0 41-4
04L40414
060060060060060
060
034034
034
034
034
034
034
A183337A183343Ar_83357 Ar-833s9
A183404A184181
A1-8436'lA1-8437 4
A184555
4 1-0l_0
'7)t4
1-99
94 72
1580
A18 4A]- B4 A184
62 o
98 37
ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 02/15/2024 r-1:16:59
VENDOR NATV1E

DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:

Schedule of Bifls

FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-VO8 .21 PAGE 1-4
AMOUNT PO# F,/P ID LINE
326 ,902 .60

ACCOUNT NAME
RECORDS PRINTED _ OOO485
38 ACS FTNANCIAL SYSTEM
02/21-/2o24 18:

BANK VENDORBANK BANK OF THE S]ERRA
Check Register
CHECK#
CITY OF GL54OR-V08.21 PAG WOODLAKE
DATE
E
AMOUNT
950486
65 1-408
803
316
l-05
1 ,542 559
6, 003 23a
4 ,48036
000252
000253001_339 0006470 0L27 6
00L261
000335002186002053
001692
00L372
0 01913
002252
000351
000766
0 0117 3000994
000646
000753000290000195
'7 460'77 4608
t 46091 46107 46II1 46127 46137 46:-4t 46157 46L67 461-7'7 461-8 7 461-97 46207 4621-1 4622'7 46237 4624'7 46257 4626'7 4627 7 46281 4629
1 78,3 AUTOZONE STORE 4485 AXON ENTERPRISE INC BSK ASSOC]ATES CENTRAL VALLEY ASPHALT CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESSCOMPANION AN]MAL MEDTCAL DEARBORN NATfONAL LIFE I

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

EWING IRRIGATTON PRODUCT

FRESNO OXYGEN

GIANT AUTO GROUP
GOODYEAR COMMERCfAL TIRE

HAMNER JEWELL ASSOCIATES
JACK GRGGS, fNC, JTM'S STEEL SUPPLY

KEY EVIDENCE LOCK & SAFE LA CASA VERDE

OLDCASTLE INFRASTRUCTURE

PAYMENTUS GROUP TNCPRECISION BRAKE & WHEEL
PRESSLEY & ASSOC]ATES, f SELF HELP ENTERPRISES IN
TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS INC.

BANK OF THE SIERRA
02/2r/24 02/2r/2402 /.2r / 24 02/2r/24 02/2L/24 02/2a/24 02/2r/24 02/2r/24 02/21,/24 02/2r/2402/21,/24 02/2r/24 02/2L/24 02/2L/24 02/2L/24 02/2L/24 02/21-/24 02/21/24 02/2r/24 02/2r/2402/21-/24 02/2r/24 02/2r/24 2,6
2 1-
65 40
5000
36 379
705000
2340
60332
1 4
6 'l
6 1
2 0I0a
000
000023
000988
l_75.0 398.6
21_ .9 83.0
38,757.O 2L5
,
60r .0
895.0
?.q1 a<q,1.L ***
39 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
02/21 /2024 18:

BANK VENDOR
REPORT TOTALS:

Check Register
CHECK#
RECORDS PRINTED - 000061

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 2
AMOUNT
35a,965 .34
DATE
40 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
02 / 21- / 2024 r8 :2'7 : 09

VENDOR NAIVIE

DESCRIPTION
AUTOZONE STORE 4485
WHEEL WETGHTS 02/2024
SoCKET/BRAKE 02/24
DISC BRAKE CALIPF, 2/24

AXON ENTERPRISE INC
AXON BDY CANLS 02/2024

BSK ASSOCIATES
BACTr 02/2024

CENTRAL VALLEY ASPHAI,T
ADA VAN STALL 02/2024

CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS
DATE STAMP 02/2024
CITY OF WOODLAKE Schedule of Bil1s GL54OR-VO8 .21 PAGE 1

AMOUNT ACCOTINT NAIVIE FUND & ACCOUNT
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN *VENDOR TOTAL 18,304.40 AXON BODY CAMERAS 001.0407.080.068

86.50 CONTRACTURAL SERV]CES 0 6 3 . 0 4 5 3 . 0 6 0 . 0 2 I 2,665.00 WOODLAKE STUDIO 00L .0421 .060 .07 4
2L4.36 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 001 . 0411 . 060 . 028
108.70 CONTRACTURAL SERVTCES 001.0411-.060.028
CLATM INVOICE PO# F,/P ID LINE
093093093
029029 o)q
060060060
0 418041_804 18
00r_00r_001
40 00
2555
100
3055
195
55 2
53 13
4 3
44859rrL5744859LL52744859]-r739
AHO3353
]-037 7 4
25091 140667 6
00041
00044
00043

COMPANION ANIMAL
EVY VET BTLL 02

MEDTCAL
/2024
093 00007
093 00020093 00019093 0002s
093 00028
DEARBORN NATIONAL L CITY EMPLOYEES O2 CITY EMPLOYEES O2 C]TY EMPLOYEES O2 CITY EMPLOYEES O2 CITY EMPLOYEES O2 CITY EMPLOYEES O2 C]TY EMPLOYEES O2 CITY EMPLOYEES 02 CITY EMPLOYEES O2 CITY EMPLOYEES O2 CITY EMPLOYEES O2 CITY EMPLOYEES 02 CITY EMPLOYEES O2 CITY EMPLOYEES O2 CITY EMPLOYEES 02 CITY EMPLOYEES O2 CITY EMPLOYEES O2 CITY EMPLOYEES O2

POLICE EMPLOYEES
202420242024
/22/
4 733.00

70.00 803.00
I
0 FEI2U 242024

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH HEALTHHEALTH *VENDOR
2024
2024
2024
202420242024202420242/2O24

96.95 70.74
o.27

3.18 1.26o.73 0.090 .67 2.24
l_38.00 319 -50
771350
9098
42 403931
0 01_00100100100r06r062063
0 415
04]-6
04l_8 042L0422
046L
0462
o463
04L2
2Q24
20242024202420242024202420242024202420242024202420242024 2U 24202420242024
00032
00032000320003200032000320003200032000320003200032
00032
0003200032
093093
20242024
093093
060060

TNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE TOTAL
0403
0404
0405
0429
0406
0460
001001001
01)q0160
008008008008008008008008
008008008008008008008008008008008
0500500500s0050050050
0500500500500500s00s00s00s0050050050
MARCH

MARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCH MARCH
MARCH

MARCHMARCH
093093093093
202420242024
74 093093093
093093093093093093093093093093
0000
072.0412
04L .044L
001_.0402 001.0411
00032
00032000320003200033

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FINGERPRINT APPS 02

BLD ALCHL ANALYSIS

EWTNG IRRIGATION PRODUCT
SUPPLTES 02/2024
CONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICES *VENDOR TOTAL 00100r041_ 1 0411 028 o28 1 l-2385 71-7 01-1
2L528044
00027
00026

31.6.23 SPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 063.0463 .060.029 093 00039 41 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 02/2L/2024 1-8;2'7:09

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION

FRESNO OXYGEN
SUPPLTES 02/2024

GIANT AUTO GROUP
ROTOR/PAp Krr/BLD 02/24 BLADE 02/2024 cR2450 02/2024

GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE
PD T]RES 02/2024
HAMNER .JEWELL ASSOCIATES
ANTLP CREEK PARK 02/24
ANTLP CREEK PARK 02/24

AIVIOIINT ACCOUNT NAME
105 .40 GREENWOOD PARK
Schedule of Bills
VEHICLE MATNTENANCVEHfCLE MAINTENANCVEHICLE MAINTENANC *VENDOR TOTALANTELOPE CREEK PARKANTELOPE CREEK PARK *VENDOR TOTAL

ORCHARD EXPENSES
ORCI{ARD EXPENSES ORCHARD EXPENSES *VENDOR TOTAL

FIIND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE
3046398360
623r95
623L97623308
r1 2-r054469203L95203344
113899135809136244
1-34328
224r5L
o30341 0L7
rNV- 15 - 1,447 20
sL-492225
33622

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 2
PO# F/P ID LINE
001.0407.080.543 093 00037
1,428.15 102 .5L
1_1_ .94
L ,542 .60
0003s0003600034
093093093
093093
539s3 9
060060
060080080
060060050
0 4070 407
001001

E/E'/E/
00 27
27 OPER 001-OPER 0 0l_
OPER 00i04LL O4II 0 41-1- 032 032 032
ss9.33 VEHTCLE MATNTENANCE/OPER 001.0411.060.032 093 00038 600
q 1n?
6,003
JACK GRGGS, INC. TANK FEE 02/2024
FINANCE CHAF'GE' 2/24
FINANCE FEE 02/24
225 .00 3.38 3.38
231- .16
0003100030

JIM'S STEEL SUPPL
SERVICE CHARGESERVICE CTIARGESERVICE CHARGESQUARE TUBE 02/ SQUARE TUBE 02/SQUARE TUBE 02/
Y
02 /.2402 /.24 02/24
2024
0010 01_001
a42Lo42L 042r
046046046
001001001
093093
093
0001_4 0001500016
20242024
5 5Z
61 ,676
04060406
0 40'70 407
04070406
080080080
080080080
54r543543543
2L26225423L023601-32360r4
23601'5
093093093093093
093
0000900010
00013000110001200008
1 1
t_
4 38)6515959
08 4L
WOODLAKE STUD]O WOODLAKE STUDIO

GREENWOOD PARKGREENWOOD PARK
GREENWOOD PARKWOODLAKE STUDIO *VENDOR TOTAL
KEY EVIDENCE LOCK & SAFE sruDro KEY 02/2024LA CASA VERDE CNTR PC FOP' STDT.O 2/24

OLDCASTLE INFRASTRUCTURE
GASKET 02/2024

PAYMENTUS GROUP INC
CANCELLED PAYMENTS 2/24
PREC]SION BRAKE & WHEEL ULTRA DUTY GR 02/2024
17s.00
36 .62
398.68
21_ .90
001001001
b /b
002
480
001061o62
505050
WOODLAKE STUDIO OO1
COMMUNITY PROMOTION FUND OO1STORMWATER PROJECT OOJ.SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 062 SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 062
o 421-0409
0550o462o462
060060080
060060
014066538
nrq
429
093 00018093 00001
093 00017

83.03 093 00003093 00040

PRESSLEY & ASSOCIATES,
SERVTCES 02/2024SERVICES 02/2024SERVICES 02/2024
ACCOTINTTNG/AUDIT]NG SERV ACCOUNTING/AUDITING SERV

INSURANCE & BONDING
I
L0 ,522
3 ,507
1-0 ,522
0404
0 46)- 0462
060060060
o24024o27
33 33
22 22
66 093093093
00021
o0422
00023
42 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 02/21/2024 l.8:27:09

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION
PRESSLEY & ASSOC]ATES, I SERVICES 02/2024 AUDrT 2023 02/2024 TELSTAR ]NSTRUMENTS INC VEHICLE TOOLS 02/2024

AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
Schedul-e of Bills
HOUS]NG
CONTRACTURAL SERV]CESCONTRACTURAL SERVICES
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES *VENDOR TOTAL

FTIND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.2]- PAGE 3
PO# F/P ID L]NE
093093
3362233623
053004
r0 ,5222l
887
50060r500000000000 ACCOUNTTNG/AUDITING SERV ACCOUNTING/AUDIT]NG SERV *VENDOR TOTAL 0463 -060.024 04L4.060 .024 00024 00029 SELF HELP ENTERPR]SES TN LOANS & GRNTS REHAB 2/24 GENERAL ADMIN 02/2024 ACTVTLY DEL REHAB 2/24 2023 CDBG-20L9 O'rC 2/24 3 ,68 38,75 L1 0,364.00 r_, 850 .00 0'72 072 072 001 AA2, 0472 o412 0472 0402 060 060 060 060 0 81_ 028 028 028 WLKHMPI .fAN-24 WLKHMPI JAN_24 WLKHMPI JAN.24 2023 CDBG APP L20257
093093093093
000040000s
0000600002
)1q
896.00 CONTRACTURAL SERVTCES 062.0462.060.028 093 00042 43 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
02 / 2L / 2024 18 :2'7 : o9

VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTfON
REPORT TOTALS:

Schedule of Bi11s
FIIND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVO]CE

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 4
AMOUNT PO# F/P ]D LINE
35L ,965 .34

ACCOUNT NAME
RECORDS PRINTED - 000061
44 ACS a2/ FINANCIAL SYSTEM 2L/2024 L8:2'7:a9 Schedule of Bil-l-s THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REV]EWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT

DATE APPROVED BY

CITY OF'WOODLAKE
GLO6OS_VO8 . 2I RECAPPAGE
GL5 4 OR
45 ACS FINANC 03/06/2024
BANK

IAL SYSTEM
t-l_:

VENDOR
Check Register
CHECK#

CTTY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_VO8 .21 PAGE 1

BANK BANK OF THE SIERRA

DATE AMOUNT
,000
002302
000593000783
00r524000944
00l-1l_4 ooL212001_801001_031_0 01913
A.R.E. AUTO PARTS ]NC ABH FOX SOLUTIONS
AFLAC

ALAMEDA ELECTRICAL DTST
AMERIPRIDE TINTFORM SERVI AT & T MOBfLITY
AI&I AT&T (NEW)ATLAS FTRE SERVICEAUTOZONE STORE 4485

AVENU INSIGHTS & ANALYTI
BENDER ROSENTHAL INC.BONNEMA'S AUTO DETAILBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE BSK ASSOCfATESBUTTONWILLOW WAREHOUSE C

CA TURF EQUIPMENT & SUPP
CAL AG OUTHOUSESCECILS GARAGECENDEJAS / EMMANUELCOHEN,/CLAYTONCOLLEGE OF THE SEQUO]A

CORONA CLAY COMPANY

CRUZ-TA WELDING SHOPFGL ENVIRONMENTAL
FOOTH]LLS SUN.GAZETTE/TH FRESNO OXYGEN

GAS COMPANY/THEHOPPER COMPANY/THEHPS WEST TNC
IBARRA SR/FEL]PE INTERWEST CONSULTING GRO

JM SQUARED ASSOCIATES IN

KIWANIS OF WOODLAKE

KNIGHT/JESSELEAGUE OF CALIF CITTES

LEMONCOVE GRANITE LLC
MASTER METER INCM]SSION SQUARE MONTES/DANNYNUTRIEN AG SOLUTfONS

PACE SUPPLY CORP
PALOMO/SAULPRINCfPAL LfFE INSURANCE

RAMOS/JOSEREYNOSO/GABRIELROGERS ANDERSON MALODY &

SIERRA AUTO & TRUCK REPA
1 46317 4632't 4633'7 46347 4635
t 4636'7 46377 46387 4639'7 46407 46 41-'7 4642'7 46437 4644 7 46451 4646I 4641'7 46487 4649'7 46507 4651,7 4652'r 4653 7 46547 45551 46s61 4651
64 1- ,392 51-4
7 ,025L ,209 343
345 L,l-66 2,]-30 s51
4 ,204 190 2,L] 0 L3 ,997 622
318
r ,135 z5u
1-92250500
r25
3,360 46L 3,r20 3,300
60 5760ot00
95 20
47 015574820000
49 z5
09I20016
o3/o6/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 o3/o6/24o3 / o6'/ 24 o3/o6/24 o3'/ o6'/ 24 03/06/2403 /.06 / 24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 o3 / o6'/ 24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 o3/06/24 03 / o6 /24o3'/ o6 / 24 o3/o6/24 03/o6/24
o3'/ o6'/ 24 03/06/24 o3/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/o6/24 o3'/ o6'/ 24 o3/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03 / 06 /24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 o3/o6/24 o3 / o6 /24 03/06/24 03/06/24
00r"888
002305
002326002069
000351
001980001_089 002324000064
oo23L6
002321002043
001868
000733
00027 4
000898000196000025000784002236
002255
001687
002044
0 0 0181
o0231,9
0001_47 000381-001_668 002226
00231,7
0 01815002065
0023]-2 001_9s8 oo23LT
0023r"s001768000291
934
0000006367
009615
38 00
'7 4658
1 46591 4660'7 466r7 4662
,
022 .1"1
,200.00 ,228 .1-6 526.21

35.00 750.00
21"4 .63
6]-8 .43
1 4663
7 46641 46651 46667 4661'7 4668
1 4669746707 4611-
7 46721 4673146747467574676146'7174678
1, ,925 . OO I,768.L2 375.00
796.87 4r7.48500.00 4,31-9.L0 750.00s00.00
5, 515 . 00 61s.00
22 1
46 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / 06 /2024 11 :

BANK VENDORBANK BANK OF THE SIERRA
Check Register
CHECK#

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 2

DATE AMOTJNT
oo23r4
001-7 44
000519000024
0 0114 5
002241-
00098800205600r-s770 01194
000691000072000832001866001020
o020'7 9
l_25.00 236.1-8
9L2 .99 32,549 -56
6 ,216 .00 200.00 I, O32 .37 220 .48 352,24r.95 L62.75
6 ,987 .1-2
S]GALA/DAVTD SILVAS OIL COMPANY ]NC SO. CA. ED]SON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON COSTANTEC CONSULTTNG SERVISUNRUN ]NSTA],LATIONS TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS INC.

THOMSON REUTERS_WESTTODD COMPANIES

TULARE COUNTY JAILTURNUPSEED ELECTRIC SERV
VALERO BROS.VERIZON WIRELESS

VINCENTE GONZALEZWOODI,AKE PLUMBING YANEZ CONSTRUCTION

BANK OF THE SIERRA
146797 46807 468L
03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/o6/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 o3/06/24 03/o6/24 o3'/ o6'/ 24 03/06/24 03/06/24 03/06/24 o3/06/24
7 46.827 4683
7 46847 46857 4686
4687468846894690469r
L Aq)
'7
7117
328381
00 46
0000
00 1 4693
7 4694
L70
r-00
1_15, 938602,4I5 .97 ***
47 ACS FTNANCIAL SYSTEM 03/o6/2024 11:

BANK VENDOR
REPORT TOTALS:

Check Register
CHECK#
RECORDS PR]NTED 000165

CTTY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_VO8,21 PAGE 3

DATE AMOUNT
602
, 4]-5 .97
48 ACS FINANCfAL SYSTEM 03/06/2024 rL:2'7:15

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION
A.R.E. AUTO PARTS
VEHICLE MAINT.

VEHICLE MAINT.VEHTCLE MAINT.

AMERIPRTDE IINIFORM

UNIFORM SERVICESUNIFORM SERVICEUNIFORM SERVICEIINIFORM SERVICEUNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERV]CE IINIFORM SERVICEUNIFORM SERVICE
Schedule of BilIs CITY OF WOODLAKE GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE L

AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAIVIE

CONTRACTURAL SERVICES
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES *VENDOR TOTAL
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE OO1
UNTFORM ALLOWANCE 062UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 063
SPEC]AL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE OO1
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 062
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 063 *VENDOR TOTAL
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER OO4 . 041.4 CR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER OO4.041-4 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER OO4 . 041.4 *VENDOR TOTAL FUND & ACCOU}TT CLAIM fNVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
INC
131
79 L264
227
24 348
96 227
1,4
2LL
03 / 2024o3'/ 202403 / 2024
SER 03/ 03/2
o3'/ 2
03/2 3/24
o3/2 03/2
03/2
725338
51 060060060
032032
o32
82l-29482r36582L643
105105
105
aoL29001300 0131

ABH FOX SOLUTIONS
CAMERA LAYOUT STUP 3/24 FILE RECOVERY 03/24
AFLAC
SUPPLMNTL INS. 03/24

ALAMEDA ELECTRICAL DIST
SUPPLTES 03/2024
92 ACCIDENT & DIS INS WITHH OO1 . OOOO .2OO . 038OO SPECfAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OOI.0422.060.O29 L,L52 240L ,392
514
'7 ,025
58 1 ano
001001
60 0060
0410.060.02804r-1.060.028
60876096
96L425
s571893s.001

DECEMBER

DECEMBE
JANUARY 2024JANUARY 2024JANUARY 2024
,JANUARY 2024
227rI8'1 6
105 00133 10s 00135
105 00064105 00016
l_05 00128
VI
24 o24024
024
3668
6Z
46 36
6I9353
95 0462
0463
041_ 00 4180462
029
011011011
029
011011-0l_ 1
l_05 105
105l_05 105
r_051_05
105
0007600077
00078000790008000081
00082
00083
0 4100 418
020 02r
020 o)o
020
060050050050
060050
050060060
060060060060060
060
2023 )a)?
20232023

DECEMBEDECEMBE
RRR
4 024
024
44 0463
050050
AT & T MOB]LITY FD CELL PHONES 03/2024 343.2O TELEPHONE AnA. iL1 A oAO O)A AI &I
PHONE CLST JACK O3l2
RD YRD DSL 03/2024 CITY HALL FAX 03/24
wwTP ALARM 03/2024
WTR TOWER ALARM O3/2
AIRPORT ATM LINE O3l
ROAD YARD FAX 03/202
ROAD YARD A3/2024
ROAD YARD 03/2024

AT&T (NEW) CITY HALL PHONES
PD PHONES 03/2024FD INTERNET USE 3
GENERAL ADMIN O3l .'T.FY cr,trpK o"/?4 FiNANE;"'dj /roiz PT,ANNTNG 03 / 2024 4 105105105
3t31
61- 6I
30 30
345
9I90
2L21-
79 79555556
41 063 04r
001001001
0 4110 418
041_0 0462
o463
0 441-
0 4180 418041-8
o20420o20
020
105105
105t-05105105
00026
00027
nnnra
00029
000300003r_ 0003200033
00034

TELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONE

TELEPHONE

UTILITIES

TELEPHONETELEPHONE
TELEPHONE *VENDOR TOTAL
105105105105
l-05105105
802802
804804804
804804
001
001001o62
001001
004001001001001
2'7
2130
a3 / 2024/24
100100
'74
55 9
5 I6
46 94
041_00 411
0414
0402
0403
o404
0405
060060060060060
060050
o20
020020
o2a
o20
020020
t 4L9596'7 41-9596
97 011-O797 071-O1
9'7 0'7 rO'7
91 0t L01
91 07 LOl
000s3
00054000390004000041
00042
00043
060528

TELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONE

TELEPHONETELEPHONE
49 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03 / o6 /2024 !1 :2'7 :!5

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION

AT&T (NEW)
BLDNG INSP 03,/2
NG
4 024
o2403/24
Schedule of Bills

AMOLINT ACCOUNT NAIVIE

TELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONETELEPHONE

TELEPHONE

TELEPHONE
TELEPHONETELEPHONE *VENDOR TOTAL
CONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICES *VENDOR TOTAL

CONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICES

CONTRACTURAL SERVICES
CONTRACTURAL SERV]CES *VENDOR TOTAL

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
SPEC]AL DEPARTMENT EXPEN *VENDOR TOTAL
001
001001001

FIIND & ACCOUNT

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR_VOB.21 PAGE 2
CLA]M INVO]CE PO# F/P ID LINE
rNVB-051_673
243
10r_883aJl.o 4449
AHO4536AHO5098AHO5165
1160054
524358
62467 I
105
PW/ENGINEERI t-05PAi?KS 03 / 202STREETS b3 /2
REFITSE 03 /20
sEwER 03/2O2

WATER DEPT O

PD INTERNET
43/
03 024
2024
3 / 2024
061o62063001
2 0
A aa8.60
29 .96
t_l-.58 84.23
243 .02
187.00
222.93
'7 4 .28
1, 156 . 01
020
020o20o20o20
020
97 07r0'7 80491 071-07 80 497 07 L07 80 49t 011-018049t ot Lol 80497 07 r01 80 4 9'7 01707 804
91 01 L01 BO 4
9'7 0'7L0'7 804
oo044000450004600047
000480004900050000s1000s2
105105105105105105105
050060060
060060050050
0422
046L
o462
o463
0 41-1-0 418
0 415
04L6
0 421-
0463
0452
060060
YARD INTERNET 001
9ro191-O1
020020
020
028028
0 01180 0119
10s105
060060060060
060060
0462
0463
042L042L
0010 01-
ATJJAS FIRE SERVICE FIRE EXT CHECKS FIRE EXT CHECKS 03/24 03/24 AUTOZONE STORE 4485
PURSUTT ROTOR 03/24
RADTATOR 03/2024WHEEL WEIGHT 03/2024
L ,065 .28 r,065 .28
2 ,
L30 .56
063
o62
060060
0463
0462
l-05t_05
00009000080 0116
105105
t-05
00021_ 00022
105 00139105 00071
105 0006310s 00067
328 .82 205.53

77.39 551 .1 4
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE,/OPER OO1. 0411. O6O VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER OO1. 0411. O6O SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1. 0418.060 *VENDOR TOTAL
4445915032448597562444859L6828
o32032
029

AVENU INSTGHTS & ANALYT
APP HSTING SFTWARE 03
T
BENDER ROSENTAL INC.

RNDABT 241/CAJON 3/24

BONNEMAIS AUTO DETAIL
PD UNfr 21 03/2024

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE
JANUARY SALARIES 03/24
BSK ASSOC]ATES WEEKLY EFFLUENT 03/24 BACTI 03/2024
BACTr O3'/2024WEEKLY EFFLUENT 03/24
4 ,204 .82
190.00
2 ,1_7 0 .00
t3 ,997 .49
AC
SPECTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1. 041O .O60 .029

CONTRACTURAL SERVICES

CONTRACTURAL SERVICES
023.0590 .749 -O2800r_ . 041r_ . 060 . 028
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1.0412. 06O.029
328
ab86
120
0005
555
24'7
651_2
062
063063
o62
028o28028
028
105
10s105105
00011000100 0111o01-1-2

BUTTONWILLOW WAREHOUSE C
ROITNDUP PWR MAX 03/24
CA TURF EQU]PMENT & SUPP ALUM ADPT SHANKS 3/24
FESCUE 03/2024
318.09 SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 062.0462.060.O29 105 00117 r ,332 4021 al F
029o29
50 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM o3/06/2024 :-r:21:15

VENDOR NAME

DESCRTPTION

CAL AG OUTHOUSES
PORTAPOTTY RNTL 03/2024
CEC]LS GARAGE OIL FLTR/OIL CHNGE OIL FLTR/OIL CHNGE 24
CENDEJAS /EMMANUEL STIPEND RE]MBRSMNT 03/24COHEN/CLAYTON STIPEND REIMBRSMNT 03/24

COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIA
POST TRNG 03/24

CORONA CLAY COMPANY
ANGEL MrX 03/2024
CITY OF WOODLAKE Schedule of Bills GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 3

AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT
250.00 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 0 0 1 . 0 4 2 1 . 0 5 0 . 0 2 8 CLA]M TNVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
3838
76 9696 r92
3/ 3/ VEHICLE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE *VENDOR TOTAL 0411.050.032 04r1,.o60.o32 OPER I OPER 001 001 530
0l_6897 0l_690602/23-02/2e/2402/0)--02/22/24
468
1538544061 3A
278495C9 - 0059
2'78495C9 - 0060
218495C9 - 006L
218495C9 - 0062
006327 9582
0063305083
0063322392
105 00005105 00018 105 00019
105 00143105 00148
105 00023105 001_41105 00110 105 0011-3
105 00005
3,360.63
250.00
500.00r_2s.00352 .92
108.75
46r .61
VOLUNTEERS _ STIPEND OO4
VOLUNTEERS _ STIPEND OO4
TRAINING (POST REIMBURSE OO1
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1

CONTRACTURAL SERVICES

SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPENSPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN *VENDOR TOTAL
0 41-4
04l-4
041_10406
060060
050060
060060036
029
CRUZ_TA WELDING SHOP LABOR & MATERIAL 3
LABOR & MTRL UNT 2 1 3/24
VEHICLE MATNTENANCE/OPER 001. 0411. 060. 032VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/OPER OO1. 0411. O6O. 032 *VENDOR TOTAL ).0295 10300

FGL ENVIRONMENTAL
ORANGIC/]NORGANIC 3 /24
FOOTH]LLS SUN_GAZETTE/TH GRNWDPIIASEI&23/24
PROP 218 PBLC NTC 3/24
WDLK HLDNGS EIR 03/24 2023 CDBG AMNDMNT 3/24
230 .29238.114'12 .7 7 a 2tro ?o
3,300.96

58.75 1.00 1.00
6A .15
GAS COMPANY/THE 325 E. ANTELPE 3,/1/ FrRE STATTON 03/202 crTY BLDNGS 03/2024 crrY YARD 03/2024 81 109 7 1-9 23 934
1952
24 3,120.00 CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 062 .0462. 060 . 028
001061001001
0405
046L
0405
o402
105l_05 105
105
00074oo0t20007500073
028
029o29 n?o
060060060050
FRESNO OXYGEN IND OXYGEN O3l

SERVICE CHARGESERVICE CHARGE

HOPPER COMPANY/THE

APPRAISAL REPORTAPPRAISAL REPORT
2024
03 / 202403/24
03/24 03/24
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 063SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 063SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 063 *VENDOR TOTAL UT]LITIES UTILITIESUTILIT]ES UTILITIES *VENDOR TOTAL
C CENTER C CENTER 0 0 1 . 0 4 0 6 . 0 I 0 . 5 4 2 001.0s50 .o80.542 0463
0463
0463
060060060
029029029
04L4 04r4
0 4100 418
050060060060
o21- 02r
021-021-
105l_05 105
105105
0 0121001-23oaL22
4 004004001001
0000200003
0006100062
CIV CIV l-,000 1,000
8338
0000
II 2504 2504 000 000
105105105105
6869
51 ACS FINANC 03/06/2024 IAL SYSTEM ]-7:2'7 :L5 Schedule of Bil-1s

ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT
*VENDOR TOTAL
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 062.0462.060.028
CLA]M INVOICE
0002s61-TN

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-VO8 .21 PAGE 4
PO# F/P ID LINE
105 00070

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION

HOPPER COMPANY/THE

HPS WEST INC
BRONZE METER 03/2024

IBARRA SR/FELIPE

CLEAN RESTROOMS O

CLEAN RESTROOMS O
AMOUNT
2, 000 . 00
2,022.Lt
02/18/ o3/03/ 02/o o2'/ 2 600 600
200
3/
3'/
8105811_ 73r,r_63 3116 3
24 24
000000
CONTRACTURAL SERVICESCONTRACTURAL SERVICES *VENDOR TOTAL 00]- .0421,. 060 . 028 001 . 0421_ . 060 . 028
264329
r24-1 844
5ZYZ
02/01-02/25/24
269123
FEBRUARY 2024
02/03-02/L5/24
5327 408019 923r4a3 - 1
02/04-02/13/24
t_05 00020 10s 00136
105 00134
105 00015
105 00140
105 0014710s 00088 105 00089
2-
1-
2424
l_

INTERWEST CONSULTTNG GRO
BLDING & SFTY SERV 3/24
JM SQUARED ASSOCIATES IN wri,o MrxER PARTS 03/24
K]WANIS OF WOODLAKE MARCH DUES 03/2024KNIGHT/JESSE
STIPEND REIMBRSMNT 03/24
LEAGUE OF CALIF C]TTES
MEMBERSHIP DUES 03/24MMBRSHIP DINNER 03/24

LEMONCOVE GRANITE LLC
CRUSHED ROCK 03/2024
CRUSHED ROCK 03/2024

MASTER METER INC
READING SFTWR SUPP 3/24
M]SSION SQUARE DEFERRED COMP 03/24

MONTES/DANNY
STIPEND REIMBRSMNT 03/24

NUTRTEN AG SOLUTIONS
SHARK EW 03/2024

PACE SUPPLY CORP
RUBBER RPR KIT 03/24

PALOMO/SAUL
STIPEND REIMBRSMEN"T 3 /24
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 001.0415.060.028
SPECfAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 062.0462.060.029
MEMBERSHIPS & SUBSCRIPTI OO1. O4O3. O5O. O38
VOLUNTEERS - STIPEND OO4.041,4. 06O. O5O
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 062.O462. O5O.029
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 063.0463 .060.029 *VENDOR TOTAL TRAVEL, CONFERENCES & ME OO1. O4O1. 060. 03O TRAVEL, CONFERENCES & ME OO1. O4O1. 060. O3O *VENDOR TOTAL 2 ,228 .3.6
s26.21

35.00 750.00
139
'75
2L4
630063
309 .21309.22
6L8 .43
L
,
925 .00
8,768.12
375.00
796.87
4r7.48
500.00
105105
00125
oo]-26
CONTRACTURAL SERV]CES 063DEFERRED COMPENSATION OO1
VOLUNTEERS - STIPEND OO4
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO1
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 062
VOLUNTEERS - STIPEND OO4
04630000
04L4
0 421-
o462
04L4
050.028200.040
060.050
060.029
060.028
060.060
105
105
1_05105
105
1-05
0000100138
00145
000t_2
0 0115
00145
52 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/o6/2024 !1-:2'7:L5

VENDOR NAME

DESCRTPTION

SILVAS OIL COMPANY
WHITE MINERAL OfL
SO. CA. ED]SON

NEW METER & SERV
Schedule of Bil1s

FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE
C]TY OF WOODLAKE GL54OR_V08.21 PAGE 5
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME PO# F/P ID LINE
EA
36 r2340
31 1_3 1890
649
2 tq66
6 06
1-
,
61-0490
4 ?1q
PRINC]PAL L]FE ]NSURANCE EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24
EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24 EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24 EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24 EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24
EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03 /.24EMPLYR CONTRBTN 03/24
PD EMPLOYEES 03/2024 F]RE EMPLOYEES 03/2024

49.6r53.0752 .6323 .02

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH

HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH
HEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTHHEALTH *VENDOR

INSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
]NSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCETNSURANCEfNSURANCE
INSURANCEINSURANCE]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCETNSURANCE
]NSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCEINSURANCE
TOTAL

MARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCH
MARCHMARCHMARCI{MARCH

MARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCHMARCH

MARCHMARCHMARCH
23 51
z542
615.00
r_25 .00236.18
91-2 .99
1J_ AC
90 1-6
98 36
10 0500s00500500s0050
050050050
008008
008008008008008008
008008
0 01_ 001
0010010010010 01_0 01_
0 01_0 61_o62063001
o402
0403
Q404040504t-5
041-6
041_8
0421-
0422
0 461-o462
0463041-2o429
0406
04600472o44L0 411
Q4]-4
2024zu 2420242024
202420242024202420242024
2024202420242024202420242024
2024 )n)a2024
008
008008008008008
008008008008
0500500s00500s0
0500s00500s0050
050
105
105t_05 105l_05 105
105
00036
000360003600036
0003600036000360003600036
000360003500036
105105105105
10s105105l-05105
t_05r-0510s105
0003600035
)i
45 33
1153aa 029
0010500120 41,001004
00036000350003600036
0003700038

RAMOS/JOSE
STIPEND RE]MBRSMNT 03/24

REYNOSO/GABRIEL
STIPEND REIMBRSMNT 03/24
ROGERS ANDERSON MALODY & CITY/FIRE AUDIT 03/24 CITY/FIRE AUDIT 03/24 CITY/FIRE AUDIT 03/24 C]TYlFIRE AUDfT 03/24

SIERRA AUTO & TRUCK REPA
SERVfCE CALL 03/2024

SIGALA/DAVID
STIPEND REIMBRSMNT 03/24
ACCOTINTING/AUDIT]NG ACCOLINT]NG/AUDITING ACCOUNT]NG/AUDITING ACCOUNTTNG/AUDITING *VENDOR TOTAL 02/07-02/2e/24o2/oe-o2/21 /24
00348602/08/2024
462Q39
5361_91_
75O. OO VOLUNTEERS STIPEND 0045OO. OO VOLUNTEERS ST]PEND 004 SERV OO]- SERV 061SERV 062SERV 063
04L4o4L4
060.060
060.060
0460.060.0280414.060.060
0462 .060 . O29o42r.060 .029
105 00149105 00142
105 00109105 00144
10s 00007105 00066
l_, 654 . 50 551_.50 L,654 .501- ,654 .50 5,5ls.00
04040461
0462
o463
024Q24
024
024
74315743757 43'7 5'7 4315
105l_05 105105
00084
000850008600087
060060
050060
INC
3/243 /24
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 060
VOLUNTEERS _ STIPEND OO4
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN 062
SPECIAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN OO]-
SOUTHERN CALIF EDfSON CO
COMMUNITY CENTER 03/24
PLAZA 03/2024
3 ,88'7 564 105 105 I604 UTILITTES UTILITfES 00L.042L. 060 . 02r- oo]- -0422.060.021 000s5 000s6 53 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/06/2024 rr:2'7:a5

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 321 N. VALENCTA 03/24
Schedule of Bil-1s

FUND & ACCOUNT

CITY OF WOODI,AKE
GL54 OR-VO 8 . 2 ]- PAGE 6
CLAIM INVOTCE PO# F/P TD LINE
2L91 822
2r91 834
AMOI]NT ACCOUNT NA}4E
ORCHARD 03/2024
PLAZA 03/2024 LIFT STATION 03l
CARWASH 03/2024
WATER DEPT O3l20
STREETS DEPT O3l
WATER DEPT 03l20
STREETS DEPT O3lCITY ADMIN BLDNG
WATER DF'P'I 03/24
MATNT. DEPT 03/2024
PARKS DEPT 03/24SEWER DEPT 03/2024
AfRPORT DEPT 03/2024
SBDVSN LTGHTNG 03/24STREETS DEPT 03/2024
FfNANCE FEE 03/2024
2024242024
3 /24
2024
SERVI
24 o24
060
060050060
060060
021- 02r
o21-
o21-
060.021060.021
060.021
0009000092
000940009s00096
000970009800099
001000 010100102
00103001040 01,0 5
001060010700108
0 0151
105 00124
105 0006s
10s 00004
105 00013
245204
564
203
609
t_5
I ,435Z
43 4,452 1 1AA
6 ,21-6
50505050
200
110110
220
r_89
L6
L'7'7
824
45 06
9'7
o4
40 53
4'7
62 03
z5
T656
000600005700058
00059
105105
105105
105105
105105
69z5
04 aa
15 42
61-
UTILfTIES

ORCHARD EXPENSES
UTfLITIES UTILIT]ES CARWASH EXPENSES UTfLfTfES UT]LITIES UTILITIES UTILfTTESUTILIT]ES UTTLITTES

UTILITIES UTILITIES
UTILITIESUTILITIES UT]LITIES UTILITIES
UTfLITIES *VENDOR TOTAL
00r_ o62001
062001
0630 01-063
00r00r_ 063
0010 01_062
0 41-
105105105
1051_05105
t_05 105105
l-0510s
021-046
02L
o2t0s0
060.021
060.021060.021-060.021
050.021
060 .024
060060
050
r_05105 080 060
o29
00r_ 00r001
001001001
0 410
o462
0422
0462
0423
0463
042204630422
0410
o463
0 418
0421-
04620 441-
0429 n4))
0 410
o4620462
105105
r,0 5l_05r_05
03 015
06 1
000000
0000
3/24
/24
3 /24 /24
9 ,31-
1_6
1-4
6 ,04

STANTEC CONSULTING
SEWR COLLCTN 03/ crY oN CALL 03/2

TODD COMPANIES
STRMWTR PIPLNE PH2
?t tr4q
352 ,24L .95
162. t5
6 ,987 .r2
CAP]TAL EXP - INFRASTRUC CONTRACTURAL SERVICES *VENDOR TOTAL

BUILDING PERMITSBUILDING PERMITS
BUILDING PERMITSBUfLDTNG PERMlTS *VENDOR TOTAL

CONTRACTURAL SERVICES
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES *VENDOR TOTAL

STORMWATER PROJECT
CONTRACTURAL SERVfCES

CONTRACTURAL SERVICES
0302 .000 .022
0302 .000 .022
0302.o00 .o22 0302.000.022
001.0411001.0411-
001.0s50.080.538
001. 041-l- . 060 .028
062 .0462. 060 . 028
0 052062
053
o28
0 0
0 0 2 4
5 0000
00 24
2448
0 SUNRI]N INSTALI,ATIONS 428 N.MGNOLfA WDLK O 105 FOREST RD WDLK 3 544 W.ANTELOPE WDLK 670 LAUREL LN WDLK 3
TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS INC vEHrcLE TOOLS 03/2024 1,032.37 CoNTRACTURAL SERVTCES O62.0462.060.028 PERMIT#5960PERMlT#6031PERMIT#5 O7O
PERMIT#6 134
1"20463
660033
807 859
2041-O
2363L5

THOMSON REUTERS-WEST
ONLINE/SOFTWARE O3
ONLINE/SOFTWARE O3 I
028
028
060
060
0003s
00150 849 849
3/24

TULARE COUNTY JAIL
DIGITAL GRAPHICS 3,/24

TURNUPSEED ELECTRIC SERV
SERVTCES 03/2024
54 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/06/2024 l.1-:2'7:15

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION
VALERO BROS.

BATTERY FOR PD 03/2024

VERIZON WIRELESS
wPD MODEMS 03/2024
V]NCENTE GONZALEZ LABOR/FUSES 03/24

WOODLAKE PLUMBING
SERVTCE CALL 03/2024

YANEZ CONS

BOOSTER

CONTRACT

CTTY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-V08.21 PAGE 7
AMOUNT
328.00
38]. .46
170.00
100.00
51,250 .00 64, 688 .00 l_15, 938 . 00
F/P TD
105
105
t_05l_05
105105
LINE
0001_4
001370 0114
00017
00132
oo1-27
Schedule of Bil1s

ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT
vEHrcLE MAfNTENANCE/OPER 001. 0411. 060. 032
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 001.0411.050.028
CONTRACTURAL SERVICES OO1,.O42T. O6O. O28CONTRACTURAL SERVICES OO1,0411.060.028 CAPITAL OUTLAY_EQUfPMENT 063 . 0463 STREET PROJECT OO1. 0406 *VENDOR TOTAL

CLATM INVOICE
016 3
9957 241-1-O502r920241089
r92572401-O
Po#
080080

TRUCTION
PUMP 03 /2024
03 / 2024
0 51_ 538
55 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/06/2024 lL:27:15

VENDOR NAME

DESCRIPTION

REPORT TOTALS
Schedule of Bi11s

ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GL54OR-VO8.21 PAGE 8
AMOUNT PO# F/P ID LINE
602,4]-5 .97
RECORDS PRINTED - 000165
56 ACS FINANCIAL SYSTEM 03/o6/2024 LL:27:L5 Schedule of Bi11s THE PRECEDING LIST OF BfLLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENTDATE APPROVED BY

CITY OF WOODLAKE
GLO6OS_VO8 . 21. RECAPPAGE
GL54 OR
57 City of Woodlake

AGENDA ITEM IV-C
March 11, 2024
Prepared by Ramon Lara, City Staff
SUBJECT:

Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of the February 2024 Monthly Report of Investments BACKGROUND:

Pursuant to Section 3.24.050 of the Woodlake Municipal Code the Finance Department prepares a report listing all investments of the City of Woodlake. The City’s temporary idle cash, those funds not immediately needed to pay current bills, is invested in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy that was approved by Resolution No. 09-05 which was adopted on February 9, 2009.

DISCUSSION:

The first objective of the investment policy is to secure the safety of the invested funds. The second objective is to match the availability (liquidity) of the funds to the cash flow needs of the organization. The third objective, that is only considered after the first two objectives have been met, is yield, or the earnings rate.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

Staff recommends that the Council approve the February 2024 Monthly Report of Investments as submitted.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution: Approval of the February 2024 Monthly Report of Investments

2. February Monthly Report of Investments
58 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF WOODLAKE

COUNTY OF TULARE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the matter of:

APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY ) Resolution No:
2024 MONTHLY REPORT OF )

INVESTMENTS )
Councilmember _________ offered the following resolution and moved its adoption. Approve the City of Woodlake’s February 2024 Monthly Report of Investments.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.24.050 of the Woodlake Municipal Code, monthly, the Finance Department shall prepare a report listing of all investments of the City of Woodlake; and WHEREAS, the City’s temporary idle cash, those funds not immediately needed to pay current bills, is invested in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy that was approved by Resolution No. 09-05.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODLAKE DOES RESOLVE to approve the City of Woodlake’s February 2024 Monthly Report of Investments.

The foregoing resolution was adopted upon a motion of Councilmember _______ and seconded by Councilmember _______ and carried by the following vote at the City Council meeting held on March 11, 2024.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

____________________________
Rudy Mendoza, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Irene Zacarias, City Clerk
59 CDs
'16.80% City of Woodlake - lnvestment Report
LAIF

8.68%
VBB
Checking

74.230h
Measure S

0.010/0

0.280/.

February 29,2024
lnvestment Tvpe
Checking - Bank of the Siena
Checking - Asset Forfeiture
Measure S - cash
LAIF
MBS - miscellaneous Portfolio Holdings
BMW Bk North Amer - 12126123
BMW BK North Amer - 04108124
BMW BK North Amer - 05113124
American Express Natl Bk - 04107125
Capital One Natl Assn - 06102125
Capital One BK USA - 06102125
Alliant CR UN Chicago ILL - 12130125
Arcadian BK Hartland Minn - 03/09/26
Connexus Cr Un Wausau Wis - 06/15/26
Finance500 - RBC lnsured Deposits
Morgan Stanley BK - 02107124
American Express - 10127125
Sallie Mae Bk Murray Utah - 10127125
Discover Bk Greenwood Del - 11102126
Capital One Natl Assn VA - 10126127
Fin500
Fin500
Fin500
Fin500
Fin500
Percent of
Portfolio

74.23o/o

0.28%

0.01%
B.68%

0.00%

1.22%

0.60%

0.59%

0.89%

0.90%

1.55Yo

1.55%

1.56%

0.00%

1.540h

1.54o/o

1.54%

0.88%

1.53%
Yield to
Maturitv
None

0.05%
None

0.75%
N/A

0.30%

0.50%

0.65%

2.55%

3.10%

3.10o/o

5.10%

5.00Yo

5.30%

0.01 3.10o/o

4.65To

4.650/0

4.7jYo

4.75%
Settlement
Date
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
12t25t21
10t08t21
't1t12t21
04t06t22
06t02t22
06t02t22
12t30t22
03t08123
06t15123
N/A
02107119
10126122
10126122
11101122
10126122
Maturitv
N/A
Monthly
N/A
Daily
Monthly
12126123
04108124
05113124
04107125
06102125
06102125
12130125
03109126
06115126
Monthly
02t07t24
10t27t25
10127125
11t02t26
10126127
MBS
MBS
MBS
MBS
MBS
MBS
MBS
MBS
MBS
Principal
$1 1 ,865,819
$45,267
$1,826
$1,387,316
$0
$1 95,1 56
$95,376
$95,007
$142,766
$143,685
$143,685
$248,1 93
$247,373
$249.325
$83
$246,723
$245,855
$245,855
$'141,058
$244,690
Total Portfolio $15,985,056 100%
I certify this of investments complies with the City's adopted investment policy and that it comp state investment guidelines pursuant to Government Code Section 16481 .2 03t01t24
Ramon Date
60 AGENDA ITEM V-A
March 11, 2024
Prepared by Emmanuel Llamas, City Staff
SUBJECT:

Information Item: Recognize U.S. Towers as the Recycler of the Year BACKGROUND:

The recycler of the year award is presented to a business that shows exemplary dedication to recycling, consistently prioritizing proper waste disposal methods in adherence to State regulations, while frequently exceeding legal requirements with its initiatives.

DISCUSSION:

Mid Valley Disposal has identified U.S. Towers as the Recycler of the Year for 2023.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

Support Mid Valley Disposal in their presentation to U.S Towers as the Recycler of the Year for 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no Fiscal Impact.
61 AGENDA ITEM V-B
March 11, 2024
Prepared by Emmanuel Llamas, City Staff
SUBJECT:

Action: Adoption of Resolution: Approval of Certification for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Final Environmental Impact Report – Public Hearing

BACKGROUND
The City of Woodlake circulated an Initial Study (IS) and Notice of Preparation (NOP) (referred to collectively as “NOP”) of the EIR for the proposed Project from May 4, 2022, to June 3, 2022 to trustee and responsible agencies, the State Clearinghouse (State Clearinghouse #2022040640), and the public. Following publication of the original NOP, changes were made to the proposed Project that consisted of an increase in project acreage and a change in Land Use Designation.

The IS/NOP was recirculated to the public, trustee and responsible agencies, and the State Clearinghouse from October 12, 2022, to November 14, 2022.

The Draft EIR was properly noticed and circulated for public review and comment for 45 days, from May 10, 2023, through June 26, 2023. The Notice of Availability was published in the Sun Gazette on May 10, 2023. The Draft EIR and Appendices were sent to the State Clearinghouse for distribution and notices were mailed to local agencies and other interested individuals. The City received two comment letters on the Draft EIR within the public review period. Each letter is reproduced in its entirety in Chapter Two of this Final EIR and responses are shown after each comment, which can be seen in the attached Final EIR document.

DISCUSSION:

Under CEQA, the Lead Agency must prepare and certify a Final EIR prior to a proposed project being approved.

The City of Woodlake is the Lead Agency on the project and has prepared a Final environmental Impact Report on the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park which includes expanding an existing industrial area by developing a 1.5 million square foot industrial center on a 113-acre site that will house various industrial uses. The complete Project description, location and the potential environmental effects are contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report.

The Final EIR allows the public and the City an opportunity to review revisions to the Draft EIR and the responses to comments received during the Draft EIRs public review period. The Final EIR serves as the environmental document to inform the City of the environmental consequences of the proposed project, either in whole or in part, or one of the alternatives to the project discussed in the Draft EIR.
62 If the City approves the Project, and as part of that action adopts mitigation measures, the City will also adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (see Public Resources Code Section 21081.6).

RECOMMENDATIONS:

That the Woodlake City Council approve the Approval of Certification for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Final Environmental Impact Report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The environmental review was paid for by the applicant.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project Initial Study

2. Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project Final EIR

3. Resolution: Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Woodlake Commercial Project
63 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF WOODLAKE

COUNTY OF TULARE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the matter of:

APPROVAL OF CERTIFICATION OF THE )
WOODLAKE HOLDINGS INDUSTRIAL PARK ) Resolution 24-

PROJECT FINAL ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT REPORT )
Councilmember ____________ offered the following resolution and moved its adoption.

Approval of Certification for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Final Environmental Impact Report.

WHEREAS, the project consists of the following:

1. Project components include developing a 1.5 million square foot industrial center on a 113-acre site that will house various industrial uses allowable by the zone district, including cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, and retail, which is allowable with a Conditional Use Permit. The site will operate from 7am to 6pm Monday through Friday. Project components include constructing and operating an industrial park with seventeen buildings ranging in size of 75,000 sf to 87,000 sf for a total of up to 1,500,000 sf of industrial space. The project at full build-out will require approximately 20 employees and will operate from 7am to 4pm Monday through Friday. The Project expects to generate an average of 20 deliveries per day using standard vans, with a total of 80 generated daily trips.

WHEREAS, the site of proposed project is located in Woodlake; and WHEREAS, the City of Woodlake is the Lead Agency on the project and has prepared a Final environmental Impact Report on the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was properly noticed and circulated for public review and comment for 45 days, from May 10, 2023 through June 26, 2023. The Notice of Availability was published in the Sun Gazette on May 10, 2023.

WHEREAS, The City received two comment letters on the Draft EIR within the public review period. Each letter is reproduced in its entirety in Chapter Two of the Final EIR and responses are shown after each comment.

WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report consists of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program which has been incorporated into the approval of the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Woodlake City Council hereby approves of the Certification for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Final Environmental Impact Report.

The foregoing resolution was adopted upon a motion of Councilmember _______________and seconded by Councilmember __________________ and carried by the following vote at the City Council meeting held on March 11, 2024.
64 AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
_____________________
Rudy Mendoza, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Irene Zacarias, City Clerk
65 Initial Study
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park
Prepared for:
350 N. Valencia Ave
Woodlake, CA 93286
(559) 564-8055
Contact: Rebecca Griswold
Prepared by:

Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
113 N. Church Street, Suite 302
Visalia, CA 93291
(559) 840-4414
Contact: Emily Bowen, LEED AP
October 2022
66 TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT INFORMATION................................................................................................. 4 Project title......................................................................................................................... 4 Lead agency name and address ..................................................................................... 4 Contact person and phone number............................................................................... 4 Project location ................................................................................................................. 4 Project sponsor’s name/address..................................................................................... 6 General plan designation................................................................................................ 7 Zoning ............................................................................................................................... 7 Project Description........................................................................................................... 7 Surrounding Land Uses/Existing Conditions .............................................................. 8 Other Public Agencies Involved .................................................................................. 11 Tribal Consultation ........................................................................................................ 11 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ................................... 12 DETERMINATION ............................................................................................................. 12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ................................................................................... 14 I. AESTHETICS ............................................................................................................... 14 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES ...................................................... 17 III. AIR QUALITY ........................................................................................................ 19 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ................................................................................... 23 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................... 29 VI. ENERGY ................................................................................................................... 32 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS......................................................................................... 34 67 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ...................................................................... 38 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS .................................................. 40 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................ 51 XIII. NOISE ..................................................................................................................... 52 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING ........................................................................ 55 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES ................................................................................................. 57 XVI. RECREATION ....................................................................................................... 59 XVII. TRANSPORTATION/ ......................................................................................... 61 TRAFFIC .......................................................................................................................... 61 XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................. 63 XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ................................................................ 66 XX. WILDFIRE ................................................................................................................ 68 XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ............................................ 70 LIST OF PREPARERS ......................................................................................................... 72 Persons and Agencies Consulted ................................................................................. 72 68 PROJECT INFORMATION
This document is the Initial Study for the potential environmental effects of the City of Woodlake’s (City) Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project (Project). The City of Woodlake will act as the Lead Agency for this project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines. Copies of all materials referenced in this report are available for review in the project file during regular business hours at 350 N. Valencia Avenue, Woodlake, CA 93286.

Project title
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park
Lead agency name and address
City of Woodlake
350 N. Valencia Avenue
Woodlake, CA 93286
Contact person and phone number
Rebecca Griswold, Community Services Director
City of Woodlake
(559) 564-8055
Project location
The City of Woodlake is located in Tulare County in the southern part of the San Joaquin Valley.

The proposed Project is located on the east side of Blair Road, south of Ropes Avenue on multiple APNs, including: 060-170-105, -106, 060-160-044 and -059. Woodlake is bisected by SR 216 and SR 245 and is situated five miles north of SR 198.
69 Figure 1 – Location
Figure 2 – Site Aerial
70 Figure 2 – Site Aerial
71 Project sponsor’s name/address
Woodlake Holdings, LLC.
1099 W. Ropes Ave
Woodlake CA 93286
General plan designation
Industrial and Urban Reserve
Zoning
Light Industrial (ML)
Project Description
The Project Applicant intends to expand an existing industrial area by developing a 113-acre industrial center that will house various industrial uses allowable by the zone district, including cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, distribution and retail, which is allowable with a Conditional Use Permit.

Project Components
• Constructing and operating an industrial park with seventeen buildings ranging in size of 75,000 sf to 87,000 sf for a total of up to 1,500,000 sf of industrial space. • Constructing internal access roads, 700 parking spaces and associated landscaping, as detailed on Figure 4 – Site Plan.
• Connecting the Project to the existing City water and wastewater systems. Any grow operations will utilize the existing well connection for water. • Installation of perimeter security, including lighting and an alarm system, in accordance with Chapter 5.48 of the Woodlake Municipal Code. • Constructing three new ponding basins of 7.93 Ac ft, 8.42 Ac ft, and 16.42 Ac ft.

Construction will begin in 2022 and will continue to buildout as the market demands.

Project Operations
The site will operate from 7am to 6pm Monday through Friday. The facility’s electrical needs will continue to be serviced by existing Southern California Edison connections that have been assessed as sufficient for full operation of allowable industrial uses, including indoor/mixed light cannabis cultivation.
72 Once a business is established, water needs for the grow houses will be serviced by existing deepwater wells while water needs for the distribution facilities and sanitary facilities will be provided by the City. Stormwater will be kept on-site, and wastewater will be connected to the City’s existing system.

To accommodate this Project, the following entitlements are required:
• Conditional Use Permit to operate under a Cannabis Business License (Cultivation, Manufacturing, Retail and Distribution) for cannabis businesses • General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of APNs 060-160-044 and -059 from Urban Reserve to Industrial
• Lot line adjustment as per the City’s requirements
• Tentative Parcel Map to divide the existing parcel into 21 separate parcels (see Figure 3)
Surrounding Land Uses/Existing Conditions
The proposed Project site consists of existing buildings and vacant land and is part of an existing industrial area. The site is surrounded by a chain link perimeter fence and is further surrounded by active agricultural production and rural residences (see Figure 2). Trees are planted along its northern and western boundaries, and a driveway running east-west across the northern portion of the parcel.

Lands surrounding the proposed Project are described as follows:
• North: Industrial, Rural Residential, Roadway.
• South: Agriculture, Rural Residential.
• East: Vacant, Agriculture.
• West: Agriculture, Roadway.
73 Figure 3 –Tentative Parcel Map
74 Figure 4 –Site Plan
75 Other Public Agencies Involved
• State of California Native American Heritage Commission • San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
• Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
• Bureau of Cannabis Control
• California Department of Health
Tribal Consultation
The City of Woodlake has not received any project-specific requests from any Tribes in the geographic area with which it is traditionally and culturally affiliated with or otherwise to be notified about projects in the City of Woodlake.
76 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture Resources
and Forest Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology / Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards &
Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology / Water
Quality
Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population / Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural
Resources
Utilities / Service
Systems
Wildfire Mandatory
Findings of
Significance

DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
77 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
10/7/2022
Rebecca Griswold
Community Services Director
City of Woodlake
Date
78 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
I. AESTHETICS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within
a state scenic highway?
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those that
are experienced from publicly accessible
vantage point). If the project is in an
urbanized area, would the project conflict
with applicable zoning and regulations
governing scenic quality?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of Woodlake is located on the San Joaquin Valley floor at the western foothills of the Sierra Nevada Mountain range. On clear days, the peaks are visible from the majority of the City. The site is located in a primarily industrial and agricultural area with large industrial facilities and orchards dominating the landscape. The proposed Project site is bounded to the north by W Ropes Ave, rural residences, and industrial activity, to the east by vacant and agricultural land, to the west by S. Blair Road and to the south by vacant land with shrubs. There are no adopted scenic resources or scenic in the area.

State Routes (SR) in the proposed Project vicinity include 216, 245 and 198. 79 RESPONSES
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and regulations governing scenic quality?
Less than Significant Impact. The City of Woodlake General Plan does not identify any scenic vistas within the proposed Project area; however, the peaks of the Sierra Nevada mountain range are clearly visible on many days of the year. A scenic vista is generally considered a view of an area that has remarkable scenery or a resource that is indigenous to the area.

The proposed Project is consistent with the existing character and uses of the surrounding area, as other built-up land, including industrial/commercial businesses, are in the neighboring vicinities. As such, Project operations will not degrade the existing visual character of the site. Construction activities may be visible from the adjacent roadside; however, the construction activities will be temporary in nature and will not affect a scenic vista.

There are no state designated scenic highways within the immediate proximity to the Project site.

California Department of Transportation Scenic Highway Mapping System identifies SR 198 east of SR 99 as an Eligible State Scenic Highway.1 This is the closest highway, located approximately six miles south of the Project site; however, the Project site is both physically and visually separated from SR 198 by intervening land uses. In addition, no scenic highways or roadways are listed within the Project area in the City of Woodlake’s General Plan or Tulare County’s General Plan. Based on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and the City’s General Plan, no historic buildings exist on the Project site. The proposed Project would not cause damage to rock outcroppings or historic buildings within a State scenic highway corridor. Any impacts would be considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
1 California Department of Transportation. California State Scenic Highways, State Scenic Highway Map. https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-community-livability/lap-liv-i-scenic-highways. Accessed January 2022. 80 d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less Than Significant Impact. Nighttime lighting is necessary to provide and maintain safe, secure, and attractive environments; however, these lights have the potential to produce spillover light and glare and waste energy, and if designed incorrectly, could be considered unattractive. Light that falls beyond the intended area is referred to as “light trespass”. Types of light trespass include spillover light and glare.

Minimizing all these forms of obtrusive light is an important environmental consideration. A less obtrusive and well-designed energy efficient fixture would face downward, emit the correct intensity of light for the use, and incorporate energy timers.

Glare results when a light source directly in the field of vision is brighter than the eye can comfortably accept. Squinting or turning away from a light source is an indication of glare. The presence of a bright light in an otherwise dark setting may be distracting or annoying, referred to as discomfort glare, or it may diminish the ability to see other objects in the darkened environment, referred to as disability glare.

Glare can be reduced by design features that block direct line of sight to the light source and that direct light downward, with little or no light emitted at high (near horizontal) angles, since this light would travel long distances. Cutoff-type light fixtures minimize glare because they emit relatively low-intensity light at these angles.

Current sources of light in the Project area are from the surrounding industrial and agricultural uses and vehicles traveling along nearby roadways. The Project would include nighttime lighting for building and security, as required by Chapter 5.48 of the Woodlake Municipal Code. Accordance with the Municipal Code will also ensure that outdoor lighting does not produce obtrusive glare onto the public right-ofway or adjoining properties. Lighting fixtures for security would be designed with “cutoff” type fixtures or shielded light fixtures, or a combination of fixture types to cast light downward, thereby providing lighting at the ground level for safety while reducing glare to adjacent properties. Accordingly, the Project would not create substantial new sources of light or glare. Potential impacts are less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
81 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST

RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code section 12220(g),
timberland (as defined by Public
Resources Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland Production
(as defined by Government Code section
51104(g)?
d. Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?

82 RESPONSES
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed Project site covers 113 acres is considered Farmland of Local Importance, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Prime Farmland, Semi-agricultural and Agricultural Commercial Land, and Urban and Built-up Land according to the California Important Farmland Finder. Of the 113-acre site, the northern 52 acres of the site is designated as Industrial by the City of Woodlake. As such, potential conversion of farmlands on this site have been found to be significant and unavoidable in the Woodlake General Plan, 2008-2028 EIR (Sch#2008101159) and a Statement of Overriding Consideration has been adopted by the City. The southern 61 acres of the site are designated as Urban Reserve and as such, the Project would result in the conversion of Urban Reserve, or agricultural lands. Therefore, this impact is potentially significant and this topic will be addressed in the forthcoming EIR.

The EIR will describe the agricultural resources in the proposed Project vicinity and a Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) will be prepared in compliance with methodology set forth by the California Department of Conservation, which will be the basis of the analysis discussed in the EIR. c. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? d. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? e. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The Project site is not under the Williamson Act contract and the Project is not zoned for forestland and does not propose any zone changes related to forest or timberland. There is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
83 III. AIR QUALITY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of the applicable air quality plan?
b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d. Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors or adversely affecting a
substantial number of people)?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The climate of the City of Woodlake and the San Joaquin Valley is characterized by long, hot summers and stagnant, foggy winters. Precipitation is low and temperature inversions are common. These characteristics are conducive to the formation and retention of air pollutants and are in part influenced by the surrounding mountains which intercept precipitation and act as a barrier to the passage of cold air and air pollutants.

The proposed Project lies within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, which is managed by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD or Air District). National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) have been established for the following criteria pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), and lead (Pb). The CAAQS also set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, and visibility.

Air quality plans or attainment plans are used to bring the applicable air basin into attainment with all state and federal ambient air quality standards designed to protect the health and safety of residents within that air basin. Areas are classified under the Federal Clean Air Act as either 84 “attainment”, “non-attainment”, or “extreme non-attainment” areas for each criteria pollutant based on whether the NAAQS have been achieved or not. Attainment relative to the State standards is determined by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The San Joaquin Valley is designated as a State and Federal extreme non-attainment area for O3, a State and Federal non-attainment area for PM2.5, a State non-attainment area for PM10, and Federal and State attainment area for CO, SO2, NO2, and Pb.2
Standards and attainment status for listed pollutants in the Air District can be found in Table 1. Note that both state and federal standards are presented.

Table 1 - Standards and Attainment Status for Listed Pollutants in the Air District Federal Standard California Standard
Ozone 0.075 ppm (8-hr avg) 0.07 ppm (8-hr avg) 0.09 ppm (1-hr avg)
Carbon Monoxide 9.0 ppm (8-hr avg) 35.0 ppm (1-hr
avg)

9.0 ppm (8-hr avg) 20.0 ppm (1-hr
avg)
Nitrogen Dioxide 0.053 ppm (annual avg) 0.30 ppm (annual avg) 0.18 ppm (1-hr avg)
Sulfur Dioxide 0.03 ppm (annual avg) 0.14 ppm
(24-hr avg) 0.5 ppm (3-hr avg)

0.04 ppm (24-hr avg) 0.25 ppm
(1hr avg)
Lead 1.5 µg/m3 (calendar quarter) 0.15
µg/m3 (rolling 3-month avg)

1.5 µg/m3 (30-day avg)
Particulate Matter (PM10) 150 µg/m3 (24-hr avg) 20 µg/m3 (annual avg) 50 µg/m3 (24-hr avg)
Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 15 µg/m3 (annual avg) 35 µg/m3 (24-hr avg) 12 µg/m3 (annual avg)
μg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Additional State regulations include:

CARB Portable Equipment Registration Program – This program was designed to allow owners and operators of portable engines and other common construction or farming equipment to register their equipment under a statewide program so they may operate it statewide without the need to obtain a permit from the local air district.

U.S. EPA/CARB Off-Road Mobile Sources Emission Reduction Program – The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) requires CARB to achieve a maximum degree of emissions reductions from off-road mobile sources to attain State Ambient Air Quality Standards (SAAQS); off- road mobile sources include most construction equipment. Tier 1 standards for large compression-ignition engines used in off-road mobile 2 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. Ambient Air Quality Standards & Valley Attainment Status. http://www.valleyair.org/aqinfo/attainment.htm. Accessed April 2021. 85 sources went into effect in California in 1996. These standards, along with ongoing rulemaking, address emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX) and toxic particulate matter from diesel engines. CARB is currently developing a control measure to reduce diesel PM and NOX emissions from existing off-road diesel equipment throughout the state.

California Global Warming Solutions Act – Established in 2006, Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) requires that California’s GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020. This will be implemented through a statewide cap on GHG emissions, which will be phased in beginning in 2012. AB 32 requires CARB to develop regulations and a mandatory reporting system to monitor global warming emissions levels.

RESPONSES
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Potentially Significant Impact. The San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB) is designated nonattainment of state and federal health-based air quality standards for ozone and PM2.5. The SJVAB is designated nonattainment of state PM10. To meet Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements, the SJVAPCD has multiple air quality attainment plan (AQAP) documents, including:
• Extreme Ozone Attainment Demonstration Plan (EOADP) for attainment of the 1-hour ozone standard (2004);
• 2007 Ozone Plan for attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard; • 2007 PM10 Maintenance Plan and Request for Redesignation; and • 2008 PM2.5 Plan.

Because of the region’s non-attainment status for ozone, PM2.5, and PM10, if the project-generated emissions of either of the ozone precursor pollutants (ROG or NOx), PM10, or PM2.5 were to exceed the SJVAPCD’s significance thresholds, then the project uses would be considered to conflict with the attainment plans. In addition, if the project uses were to result in a change in land use and corresponding increases in vehicle miles traveled, they may result in an increase in vehicle miles traveled that is unaccounted for in regional emissions inventories contained in regional air quality control plans. 86 Predicted construction and operational emissions may exceed the SJVAPCD’s significance thresholds for ROG, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 , could potentially create a cumulatively considerable net increase of these pollutants, could potentially expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and could result in other emissions. Therefore, this impact is potentially significant.

This topic will be addressed in the Project’s forthcoming EIR. 87 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations,
or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement
of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
88 e. Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project site is located in a portion of the central San Joaquin Valley that has, for decades, experienced intensive agricultural and urban disturbances. Current agricultural endeavors in the region include dairies, groves, and row crops.

Like most of California, the Central San Joaquin Valley experiences a Mediterranean climate. Warm dry summers are followed by cool moist winters. Summer temperatures usually exceed 90 degrees Fahrenheit, and the relative humidity is generally very low. Winter temperatures rarely raise much above 70 degrees Fahrenheit, with daytime highs often below 60 degrees Fahrenheit. Nearly all precipitation falls in the form of rain and stormwater readily infiltrates the soils of the surrounding the sites.

Native plant and animal species once abundant in the region have become locally extirpated or have experienced large reductions in their populations due to conversion of upland, riparian, and aquatic habitats to agricultural and urban uses. Remaining native habitats are particularly valuable to native wildlife species including special status species that still persist in the region. According to the Woodlake General Plan, most of the open space in the Woodlake area is dominated by agriculture. Citrus, olives, and grazing land are the dominant uses, which may attract the San Joaquin kit fox and burrowing owls.

The Project site currently consists of industrial buildings with graveled parking areas and fallowed agricultural land. The Project site’s surrounding lands consist of industrial facilities, active agriculture, roadways and rural residences. A Biological Resource Evaluation (BRE) was prepared for the proposed Project in January 2022 by Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC (see Appendix A). As part of the BRE, the California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB), the California Native Plant Society’s Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants, and the USFWS special status species lists were queried for records of specialstatus plant and animal species in the Project area. In addition, a field reconnaissance survey of the Project site was conducted in January 2022. The BRE is included in its entirety in Appendix A. 89 Antelope Creek, an evidently usually dry channelized waterway, bordered the Project site to the east; its banks supported several ground squirrel burrows. The Project site supported four retention ponds, three of which held water at the time of the BRE survey.

RESPONSES
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporation. The USFWS species list for the Project included 13 species listed as threatened, endangered, or candidate under the FESA. Of those 13 species, 12 species could not occur on or near the Project site due to either the lack of habitat, the project site being outside the current range of the species, or the presence of development that would otherwise preclude occurrence. One species, the San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica – FE, ST), could occur on or near the Project site. As identified in the species list in Appendix A, the Project site does not occur in USFWSdesignated or proposed critical habitat for any species (Appendix A).

From the CNDDB record search for special-status species, 16 are known from within five miles of the Project site (Appendix A). Of those species, San Joaquin kit fox (mentioned above) and western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus – SSSC) could occur on or near the Project site. In addition, burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia – SSSC) and pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus – SSSC) were identified in the nine-quad search and could occur on or near the Project site.

Migratory birds could nest on or near the Project site. Bird species that may nest on or near the Project site include, but are not limited to, the house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus) and northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos).

Implementing Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-4 would reduce any contribution to cumulative impacts on biological resources to a less than significant level.

Mitigation Measures:

BIO-1
Protect San Joaquin kit fox
To protect San Joaquin kit fox, a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey within 30 days prior to the start of ground-disturbing activities to identify potential dens (burrows larger 90 than 4 inches in diameter) in suitable land cover types on and within 250 feet of the Project site.

If potential dens for San Joaquin kit fox are present, their disturbance and destruction shall be avoided. Exclusion zones shall be implemented based on the type of den and current use:

Potential Den—50 feet; Known Den—100 feet; Natal or Pupping Den—to be determined on a case-by-case basis in coordination with USFWS and CDFW. All pipes greater than 4 inches in diameter stored on the construction site shall be capped, and exit ramps shall be installed in trenches and other excavations to avoid direct mortality. When possible, construction shall be conducted outside of the breeding season from October 1 to November 30. If den avoidance is not possible, procedures in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Standardized Recommendations for Protection of the Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior or During Ground Disturbance (USFWS 2011) shall be followed.

BIO-2
Protect Burrowing Owl

1. Conduct focused burrowing owl surveys to assess the presence/absence of burrowing owl in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012) and Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (CBOC 1997). These involve conducting four pre-construction survey visits.

2. If a burrowing owl or sign of burrowing owl use (e.g., feathers, guano, pellets) is detected on or within 500 feet of the Project site, and the qualified biologist determines that Project activities would disrupt the owl(s), a construction-free buffer, limited operating period, or passive relocation shall be implemented in consultation with the CDFW.

BIO-3
Protect Roosting Pallid Bat and Western Mastiff Bats
A pre-construction clearance survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that no roosting pallid bats will be disturbed during the implementation of the Project. A preconstruction clearance survey shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of construction activities. During this survey, the qualified biologist shall inspect all potential roosting habitat in and immediately adjacent to the impact areas. If an active roost is found close enough to the construction area to be disturbed by these activities, the qualified biologist shall determine the extent of a construction-free buffer to be established around the roost. If work cannot proceed without disturbing the roosting bats, work may need to be halted or redirected to other areas until the roost is no longer in use.

BIO-4
91 Protect Nesting Birds

1. To the extent practicable, construction shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season, which extends from February through August.

2. If it is not possible to schedule construction between September and January, preconstruction surveys for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that no active nests will be disturbed during the implementation of the Project. A preconstruction survey shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of construction activities. During this survey, the qualified biologist shall inspect all potential nest substrates in and immediately adjacent to the impact areas. If an active nest is found close enough to the construction area to be disturbed by these activities, the qualified biologist shall determine the extent of a construction-free buffer to be established around the nest. If work cannot proceed without disturbing the nesting birds, work may need to be halted or redirected to other areas until nesting and fledging are completed or the nest has otherwise failed for non-construction related reasons.
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. The channelized Antelope Creek is within 50 feet of the Project site. As a stream in California, it is under the regulatory jurisdiction of the CDFW; as a potential surface water in California, it may be under the regulatory jurisdiction of the SWRCB; and as a potential tributary of the St Johns River, it may be under the regulatory jurisdiction of the USACE; however, due to distance from the Project site, no impacts to Antelope Creek are anticipated.

In addition, four retention ponds were on the Project site (Appendix A). Although these represent surface waters in California, they do not qualify as waters of the state under the regulatory jurisdiction of the SWRCB because they were constructed and are maintained. No impacts to protected wetlands will occur due to Project implementation.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
92 d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
No Impact. There are no natural waterways or natural vegetation on the subject site. There would be no impact to native species movement.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
No Impact. The City of Woodlake’s General Plan includes policies for the protection of biological resources, including minimizing the impact of new development on biotic resources. The proposed Project would not conflict with any of the adopted policies. There is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The proposed Project site is not within an area set aside for the conservation of habitat or sensitive plant or animal species pursuant to a Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. As such, there is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
93 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as
defined in §15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
c. Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Archaeological resources are places where human activity has measurably altered the earth or left deposits of physical remains. Archaeological resources may be either prehistoric (before the introduction of writing in a particular area) or historic (after the introduction of writing). The majority of such places in this region are associated with either Native American or Euroamerican occupation of the area. The most frequently encountered prehistoric and early historic Native American archaeological sites are village settlements with residential areas and sometimes cemeteries; temporary camps where food and raw materials were collected; smaller, briefly occupied sites where tools were manufactured or repaired; and special-use areas like caves, rock shelters, and sites of rock art. Historic archaeological sites may include foundations or features such as privies, corrals, and trash dumps.

The prehistoric and historic site records and literature search was completed by the California Historical Resources Information System, Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (CHRIS/SSJVIC), California State University Bakersfield (File RS# 21-098, March 29, 2021). Specialized listings for cultural resources consulted by the SSJVIC include the Historic Properties Directory for Tulare County with the most recent updates of the National Register of Historic Places, California Historical Landmarks, and California Points of Historical Interest as well as other evaluations of properties reviewed by the State of California Office of Historic Preservation. Other sources consulted by the SSJVIC include California Inventory of Historic Resources, California Points of Historical Interest, and California Register. In 94 addition, The California History Plan and Five Views: An Ethnic Sites Survey for California, Historic Properties Directory and available local and regional surveys/inventories/historic maps were consulted.

The records search found that two previous cultural resource studies have been conducted within the project area, and ten cultural resource studies have been conducted within a one-half mile radius. There are five recorded resources within the one-half mile radius, P-54-003992, 004003, 004034, 004614, and 004875. These resources consist of historic era storage tanks, Bravo Lake, another historic era railroad, an historic era canal, and an historic era ditch.

Resource P-54-004614, the Friant-Kern Canal, has been given a National Register Status Code of 2S2, indicating this property has been determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places by a consensus through the Section 106 process. The resource is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources. There are no other recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, or the California State Historic Landmarks. See Appendix B.

No additional archaeological or historic resources were identified within or near the project site.

RESPONSES
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
c. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. The Project area is highly disturbed, consisting developed industrial/warehouse uses and vacant land, lined on the western and northern boundaries with trees. There are no known or visible cultural, historic or archaeological resources, paleontological resources, or human remains that exist on the surface of the project area.

Although no cultural or archaeological resources, paleontological resources or human remains have been identified in the project area, the possibility exists that such resources or remains may be discovered during Project site preparation, excavation and/or grading activities. Mitigation Measures CUL – 1 and CUL – 2 will be implemented to ensure that Project will result in less than significant impacts with mitigation.
95 Mitigation Measures:

CUL – 1 Should evidence of prehistoric archeological resources be discovered during construction, the contractor shall halt all work within 25 feet of the find and the resource shall be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. If evidence of any archaeological, cultural, and/or historical deposits is found, hand excavation and/or mechanical excavation shall proceed to evaluate the deposits for determination of significance as defined by the CEQA guidelines. The archaeologist shall submit reports, to the satisfaction of the City of Woodlake, describing the testing program and subsequent results. These reports shall identify any program mitigation that the project proponent shall complete in order to mitigate archaeological impacts (including resource recovery and/or avoidance testing and analysis, removal, reburial, and curation of archaeological resources).

CUL – 2 In order to ensure that the proposed project does not impact buried human remains during project construction, the project proponent shall be responsible for on-going monitoring of project construction. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the project proponent shall provide the City of Woodlake with documentation identifying construction personnel that will be responsible for on-site monitoring. If buried human remains are encountered during construction, further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall be halted until the Tulare County Coroner is contacted and the coroner has made the determinations and notifications required pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. If the coroner determines that Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c) require that he give notice to the Native American Heritage Commission, then such notice shall be given within 24 hours, as required by Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c). In that event, the NAHC will conduct the notifications required by Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. Until the consultations described below have been completed, the landowner shall further ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices where Native American human remains are located, is not disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred with the Most Likely Descendants on all reasonable options regarding the descendants' preferences and treatments, as prescribed by Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b). The NAHC will mediate any disputes regarding treatment of remains in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.94(k). The landowner shall be entitled to exercise rights established by Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(e) if any of the circumstances established by that provision become applicable. 96 VI. ENERGY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of
energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
California’s total energy consumption is second-highest in the nation, but in 2018 the state’s per capita energy consumption ranked the fourth-lowest, due in part to its mild climate and its energy efficiency programs. 3 In 2018, California was the top-ranking producer of electricity from solar, geothermal and biomass energy, and second in the nation in conventional hydroelectric power generation.

Energy usage is typically quantified using the British thermal unit (BTU). As a point of reference, the approximately amounts of energy contained in common energy sources are as follows:

Energy Source BTUs4
Gasoline 120,286 per gallon
Natural Gas 1,037 per cubic foot
Electricity 3,412 per kilowatt-hour
3 U.S. Energy Information Administration. Independent Statistics and Analysis. California Profile Overview. https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs-1. Accessed January 2022. 4 U.S. Energy Information Administration. Energy Units and Calculators Explained.https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/units-andcalculators/british-thermal-units.php. Accessed January 2022. 97 California electrical consumption in 2020 was 853.6 trillion BTU5, as provided in Table 3, while total electrical consumption by Tulare County in 2020 was 4642.81 GWh (or 15.842 trillion BTU).6 California Electricity Consumption Estimates 20207
End User BTU of energy
consumed (in trillions)
Percentage of total
consumption
Residential 323.9 37.94
Commercial 365.1 42.77
Industrial 162.5 19.04
Transportation 2.1 0.25
Total 853.6 --
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) reports that approximately 36.42 million vehicles were registered in the state in 2019, while in 2018 a total estimated 347.2 billion vehicles miles were traveled (VMT).8

RESPONSES
a. Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed Project consists of the development of a 1,500,000 sf industrial park. The Project would introduce energy usage on a site that is currently demanding minimal energy.

Therefore, this impact is potentially significant.

This topic will be addressed in the Project’s forthcoming EIR. 5 U.S. Energy Information Administration. Independent Statistics and Analysis. California Profile Overview. https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs-1. Accessed January 2022. 6 California Energy Commission. Electricity Consumption by County. http://ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx. Accessed January 2022. 7 U.S. Energy Information Administration. Electricity Consumption Estimates. https://www.eia.gov/state/seds/sep_fuel/html/pdf/fuel_use_es.pdf. Accessed January 2022 8 Caltrans. 2020. California Transportation Fact Booklet. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/research-innovation-systeminformation/documents/caltrans-fact-booklets/2020-cfb-v2-a11y.pdf. Accessed January 2022. 98 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based
on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil?
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that
is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined
in Table 18-1-B of the most recently
adopted Uniform Building Code
99 creating substantial direct or indirect
risks to life or property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of Woodlake is situated along the western slope of a northwest-trending belt of rocks comprising the Sierra Nevada and within the southern portion of the Cascade Range. The Sierra Nevada geomorphic province is primarily composed of cretaceous granitic plutons and remnants of Paleozoic and Mesozoic metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks, and Cenozoic volcan and sedimentary rocks.

There are no known active earthquake faults in the City of Woodlake. According to the Woodlake General Plan, the nearest active faults are the San Andreas, 65 miles west; the Owens Valley, 75 miles east; and the White Wolf; 75 miles south.

The Woodlake General Plan also states that much of the Project area has soils with high clay content that can expand and contract as water conditions change.

RESPONSES
a-i. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication

42. a-ii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking? 100
a-iii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? a-iv. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project site is not located in an earthquake fault zone as delineated by the 1972 Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map Act.9 The nearest known potentially active fault is the Clovis Fault, located over thirty miles northwest of the site. No active faults have been mapped within the Project boundaries, so there is no potential for fault rupture. It is anticipated that the proposed Project site would be subject to some ground acceleration and ground shaking associated with seismic activity during its design life. The Project site would be engineered and constructed in strict accordance with the earthquake resistant design requirements contained in the latest edition of the California Building Code (CBC) for seismic zone III, as well as Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, and therefore would avoid potential seismically induced hazards on planned structures. The impact of seismic hazards on the project would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will construct and operate an industrial park which includes cannabis retail and distribution facilities with the associated improvements. The Project site has a generally flat topography, is in an established urban area and does not include any Project features that would result in soil erosion or loss of topsoil. Therefore, the impact is less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
9 California Department of Conservation. EQ Zapp: California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/. Accessed January 2022. 101
Less than Significant Impact. As described in Responses (a.iii) and (a.iv) above, the proposed Project would not require a substantial grade change or change in topography. Any impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the most recently adopted Uniform Building Code creating substantial risks to life or property? Less than Significant Impact. See Responses (c) and (a-ii). The impact is less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? No Impact. The proposed Project will tie into the existing City water, wastewater, and stormdrain systems and will not require installation of a septic tank or alternate wastewater disposal system. There is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant Impact. As identified in the previous cultural studies perform for the project site, there are no known paleontological resources on or near the site (see Section V. for more details).

Mitigation measures have been added that will protect unknown (buried) resources during construction, including paleontological resources. There are no unique geological features on site or in the area.

Therefore, there is a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
102
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Various gases in the earth’s atmosphere play an important role in moderating the earth’s surface temperature. Solar radiation enters earth’s atmosphere from space and a portion of the radiation is absorbed by the earth’s surface. The earth emits this radiation back toward space, but the properties of the radiation change from high-frequency solar radiation to lower-frequency infrared radiation. GHGs are transparent to solar radiation but are effective in absorbing infrared radiation. Consequently, radiation that would otherwise escape back into space is retained, resulting in a warming of the earth’s atmosphere. This phenomenon is known as the greenhouse effect. Scientific research to date indicates that some of the observed climate change is a result of increased GHG emissions associated with human activity.

Among the GHGs contributing to the greenhouse effect are water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone, Nitrous Oxide (NOx), and chlorofluorocarbons. Human-caused emissions of these GHGs in excess of natural ambient concentrations are considered responsible for enhancing the greenhouse effect. GHG emissions contributing to global climate change are attributable, in large part, to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors.

In California, the transportation sector is the largest emitter of GHGs, followed by electricity generation.

Global climate change is, indeed, a global issue. GHGs are global pollutants, unlike criteria pollutants and TACs (which are pollutants of regional and/or local concern). Global climate change, if it occurs, could potentially affect water resources in California. Rising temperatures could be anticipated to result in sea-level rise (as polar ice caps melt) and possibly change the timing and amount of precipitation, which could alter water quality. According to some, climate change could result in more extreme weather 103
patterns; both heavier precipitation that could lead to flooding, as well as more extended drought periods. There is uncertainty regarding the timing, magnitude, and nature of the potential changes to water resources as a result of climate change; however, several trends are evident.

Snowpack and snowmelt may also be affected by climate change. Much of California’s precipitation falls as snow in the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascades, and snowpack represents approximately 35 percent of the state’s useable annual water supply. The snowmelt typically occurs from April through July; it provides natural water flow to streams and reservoirs after the annual rainy season has ended. As air temperatures increase due to climate change, the water stored in California’s snowpack could be affected by increasing temperatures resulting in: (1) decreased snowfall, and (2) earlier snowmelt.

RESPONSES
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Potentially Significant Impact. Greenhouse gas emissions would generate from long-term area and mobile sources as well as indirectly from energy consumption. Mobile sources would include residential vehicle trips and area source emissions would result from consumption of natural gas and electricity.

Potential impacts to greenhouse gas emissions are potentially significant and as such, will be analyzed in the forthcoming EIR.
104
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS

MATERIALS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e. For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard or
excessive noise for people residing or
working in the project area?
f. Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
105
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS

MATERIALS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
g. Expose people or structures either directly
or indirectly to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The area immediately surrounding the proposed Project consists of industrial and agricultural uses. The proposed Project site consists of an existing industrial area and vacant land. Trees are planted along its northern and western boundaries and a chain link fence runs along the perimeter of the entire site.

RESPONSES
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less than Significant Impact. This impact is associated with hazards caused by the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Proposed Project construction activities may involve the use and transport of hazardous materials. These materials may include fuels, oils, mechanical fluids, and other chemicals used during construction. Transportation, storage, use, and disposal of hazardous materials during construction activities would be required to comply with applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. Compliance would ensure that human health and the environment are not exposed to hazardous materials. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program through the submission and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan during construction activities to prevent contaminated runoff from leaving the project site. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur during construction activities.

The operational phase of the proposed Project would occur after construction is completed and employees move in to occupy the expanded space on a day-to-day basis. The proposed Project includes land uses that 106
are considered compatible with the surrounding uses with a Conditional Use Permit. None of these land uses routinely transport, use, or dispose of hazardous materials, or present a reasonably foreseeable release of hazardous materials, with the exception of common commercial grade hazardous materials such as household and commercial cleaners, paint, etc. The proposed Project would not create a significant hazard through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor would a significant hazard to the public or to the environment through the reasonably foreseeable upset and accidental conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment occur. Therefore, the proposed Project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment and any impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. No schools are located within 0.25 mile of the Project site. This condition precludes the possibility of activities associated with the proposed Project exposing schools within a 0.25‐mile radius of the project site to hazardous materials. No impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
No Impact. The proposed Project site is not located on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (Geotracker and DTSC Envirostor databases – accessed in January 2022).10 There are no hazardous materials sites that impact the Project. As such, no impacts would occur that would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
10 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Envirostor Database. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=woodlake+ca. Accessed January 2022. 107
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? Less than Significant Impact. There are no private airstrips in the Project vicinity. The Woodlake Municipal Airport is located approximately 0.7 miles southeast of the site. The proposed site is located inside the Airport Land Use Plan’s Safety Zone 6 (Traffic Pattern Zone).11 However, the proposed Project does not include residential development, which would require adherence to restrictive development policies provided by the ALUC. The Tulare County Airport Land Use Compatibility Matrix identifies “warehouse, wholesale and distributing” as well as “industrial manufacturing” and “indoor processes” as compatible land uses within Safety Zone 6. Furthermore, the proposed land use would not substantially contribute to the severity of an aircraft accident nor result in a substantial safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area. Thus, any impacts are less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
f. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact. The Project will not interfere with any adopted emergency response or evacuation plan.

There is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
g. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
No Impact. There are no wildlands on or near the Project site. There is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
11 Tulare County Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan. December 2012. https://tularecounty.ca.gov/rma/rma-documents/planningdocuments/tulare-county-comprehensive-airport-land-use-plan/. Accessed January 2022. 108
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER

QUALITY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a. Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface or
ground water quality?
b. Substantially decrease groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which
would:
i. Result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off- site;
ii. substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or
offsite;
iii. create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff; or
iv. impede or redirect flood flows?
109
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER

QUALITY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of a water quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater management
plan?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of Woodlake obtains its water supply from a vast aquifer underlying the San Joaquin Valley.

The City provides water service to all developed areas within the City and the unincorporated county service area called Wells Tract, which contains approximately 50 residential dwellings.

Water is supplied to the City by five wells that are located in the southern portion of the City; adjacent to the St. Johns River. The yield of city wells ranges from 350 to 1,500 gallons per minute.

RESPONSES
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project has the potential to impact water quality standards and/or waste discharge requirements during construction (temporary impacts) and operation. Impacts are discussed below.

Construction
Grading, excavation and loading activities associated with construction activities could temporarily increase runoff, erosion, and sedimentation. Construction activities also could result in soil compaction and wind erosion effects that could adversely affect soils and reduce the revegetation potential at construction sites and staging areas.
110
Three general sources of potential short-term construction-related stormwater pollution associated with the proposed project are: 1) the handling, storage, and disposal of construction materials containing pollutants; 2) the maintenance and operation of construction equipment; and 3) earth moving activities which, when not controlled, may generate soil erosion and transportation, via storm runoff or mechanical equipment. Generally, routine safety precautions for handling and storing construction materials may effectively mitigate the potential pollution of stormwater by these materials. These same types of common sense, “good housekeeping” procedures can be extended to non-hazardous stormwater pollutants such as sawdust and other solid wastes.

Poorly maintained vehicles and heavy equipment leaking fuel, oil, antifreeze, or other fluids on the construction site are also common sources of stormwater pollution and soil contamination. In addition, grading activities can greatly increase erosion processes. Two general strategies are recommended to prevent construction silt from entering local storm drains. First, erosion control procedures should be implemented for those areas that must be exposed. Secondly, the area should be secured to control offsite migration of pollutants. These Best Management Practices (BMPs) would be required in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be prepared prior to commencement of Project construction. When properly designed and implemented, these “good-housekeeping” practices are expected to reduce shortterm construction-related impacts to less than significant.

In accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Program, the Project will be required to comply with existing regulatory requirements to prepare a SWPPP designed to control erosion and the loss of topsoil to the extent practicable using BMPs that the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) has deemed effective in controlling erosion, sedimentation, runoff during construction activities. The specific controls are subject to the review and approval by the RWQCB and are an existing regulatory requirement.

Operation
The proposed Project includes the construction and operation of a 113-acre industrial center that will house various industrial uses allowable by the zone district, including cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, retail and distribution, which is allowable with a Conditional Use Permit. The Project will tie into the existing City water and wastewater systems, and will direct stormwater to three on-site basins that will be constructed as part of the Project. Any grow operations will utilize the existing well connection for water. The State Water Resources Control Board has established General Order WQ 2019- 0001-DWQ for cannabis cultivation. Any proposed cannabis tenants will be in compliance with the rules and requirements set forth in the General Order.

Therefore, any impacts are less than significant.
111
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Less than Significant Impact. According to the Woodlake General Plan 2008-2028, the aquifer underlying the City is a good supply of water, although the relative shallowness of the water table can make the supply susceptible to surface contaminants. The water table is recharged primarily by water moving downhill from the watersheds of Sierra Nevada streams. The St. Johns River, which forms the southern boundary of the City of Woodlake, charges the aquifer from which Woodlake pumps its domestic water.

Project demands for groundwater resources in connection with the proposed Project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies and/or otherwise interfere with groundwater recharge efforts being implemented by the City of Woodlake. The proposed Project is not anticipated to result in additional demands for groundwater resources beyond those considered in the adopted City of Woodlake General Plan as the proposed Project is an allowable use within the land designation, with an approved Conditional Use Permit. Any impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i. result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite; ii. substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite;
iii. create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv. impede or redirect flood flows?
The proposed Project includes changes to the existing stormwater drainage pattern of the area through the installation of new buildings, parking areas, landscaping, and sidewalks. Stormwater will be directed 112
to three on-site basins that will be constructed as part of the project. All stormwater will remain on-site.

The proposed Project will be required to comply with existing regulatory requirements to prepare a SWPPP which will limit on or offsite erosion or siltation. The Project would not otherwise degrade water quality. The project will have a less than significant impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
d. In flood hazard, tsunami or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project is located outside the Flood Inundation Area, defined by the City of Woodlake Special Flood Hazard Area Map. These maps are provided by the Tulare County MultiJurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan12 (MJLHMP) a compiled by Tulare County, FEMA, USGS, USDA and US Census.

The City of Woodlake is located inside the Terminus Dam inundation area. If the Terminus Dam failed while at full capacity, its floodwaters would arrive in Woodlake within approximately six hours. The Project is located inside the Dam Inundation Area, defined by the City of Woodlake Dam Inundation Area Map. Dam failure has been adequately planned for through the Tulare County MJLHMP, which the proposed Project is required to be in compliance with. The project will not conflict with any water quality control plans or sustainable groundwater management plan. Therefore, any impacts are less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
12 Tulare County Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. March, 2018. http://www.dinuba.org/images/2018/Tulare_County_MJLHMP-COMP-2018.pdf. Accessed February 2022. 113
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Physically divide an established
community?
b. Cause a significant environmental impact
due to a conflict with any land use plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project site is in the southwestern portion of the City of Woodlake. The Project vicinity is heavily disturbed with industrial, rural residential and agricultural uses. Portions of the site are currently developed and operating with industrial/warehouse uses, see Figure 2 – Aerial Map. The site is zoned Light Industrial and the General Plan Land Use Designation is Industrial and Urban Reserve.

RESPONSES
a. Physically divide an established community?
b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the General Plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact. The proposed Project is located in the eastern portion of Woodlake, in an area of industrial, agricultural and rural residential land uses. The proposed Project site is currently a mix of an existing industrial facility and agricultural trees.

As noted earlier, the proposed Project includes construction and operation of a 113-acre industrial center that will house various industrial uses allowable by the zone district, including cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, retail and distribution, which is allowable with a Conditional Use Permit. As part of the Project, a General Plan land use change will eliminate the Urban Reserve and the designation will be amended to Industrial. The industrial park includes construction and operation of seventeen buildings ranging in size 114
of 75,000 sf to 87,000 sf for a total of up to 1,500,000 sf of industrial space. The Project also includes construction of ponding basins, internal access roads, 700 parking spaces and associated landscaping, sidewalk, and fencing. The proposed Project is an allowable use within the existing zone district, with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the Cannabis Cultivation, Manufacturing, Retail and Distribution License.

The proposed Project will be in accordance with Chapter 5.48 of the Woodlake Municipal Code which allows cannabis businesses and establishes permitting procedures and regulations.

With Project approval, the proposed Project will be consistent with the Woodlake General Plan objectives and policies and will not significantly conflict with applicable land use plans, policies or regulations of the City of Woodlake. There is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
115
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of
the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
There are no known mineral resources within the planning area and no known mining of mineral resources occurs in the City of Woodlake. The closest significant mineral resources consist of sand and gravel deposits along the St. Johns River southeast of Woodlake, near the Sierra Nevada foothills.13

RESPONSES
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. There are no known mineral resources in the proposed Project area and the site is not included in a State classified mineral resource zones. Therefore, there is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
13 City of Woodlake General Plan. Open Space, Parks, Recreation and Conservation Element. Page 7. 116
XIII. NOISE
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the vicinity of the project in
excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c. For a project located within the vicinity of
a private airstrip or an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise
levels?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The Project site is located within the City of Woodlake in an industrial, rural residential and agricultural area, see Figure 2 – Site Aerial. Portions of the site are currently developed with industrial/warehouse uses.

RESPONSES
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? 117
Less than Significant Impact.

Short-term (Construction) Noise Impacts
Proposed Project construction related activities will involve temporary noise sources and are anticipated occur starting in 2022 and will continue to buildout as the market demands. Typical construction related equipment include graders, trenchers, small tractors and excavators. During the proposed Project construction, noise from construction related activities will contribute to the noise environment in the immediate vicinity. Activities involved in construction will generate maximum noise levels, as indicated in Table 5, ranging from 79 to 91 dBA at a distance of 50 feet, without feasible noise control (e.g., mufflers) and ranging from 75 to 80 dBA at a distance of 50 feet, with feasible noise controls.

Table 5
Typical Construction Noise Levels
Type of Equipment dBA at 50 ft
Without Feasible Noise Control With Feasible Noise Control Dozer or Tractor 80 75
Excavator 88 80
Scraper 88 80
Front End Loader 79 75
Backhoe 85 75
Grader 85 75
Truck 91 75
The distinction between short-term construction noise impacts and long-term operational noise impacts is a typical one in both CEQA documents and local noise ordinances, which generally recognize the reality that short-term noise from construction is inevitable and cannot be mitigated beyond a certain level. Thus, local agencies frequently tolerate short-term noise at levels that they would not accept for permanent noise sources. A more severe approach would be impractical and might preclude the kind of construction activities that are to be expected from time to time in urban environments. Most residents of urban areas recognize this reality and expect to hear construction activities on occasion.

In addition, construction activities would not occur between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM, in accordance with Woodlake Municipal Code Section 8.24.020, which limits work “between the hours of ten p.m. of one day and seven a.m. of the following day…” Further restrictions on construction noise may be placed on the project as determined through the Conditional Use permit process.

Long-term (Operational) Noise Impacts
118
The primary source of on-going noise from the proposed Project will be from vehicles traveling to and from the site. Project implementation will generate noise associated with hitching and unhitching trailers and an increase in traffic on some roadways in the Project area. However, the new trips associated with the project is not likely to increase the ambient noise levels by a significant amount, as the site is surrounded by active agriculture. In accordance with the Woodlake Municipal Code, commercial cannabis operations shall be subject to the City’s noise and nuisance ordinances. Additionally, deliveries to the commercial cannabis business may only take place during regular business hours. As such, any impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. As noted earlier, the Woodlake Municipal Airport is located approximately 0.7 miles southeast of the Project site. The proposed site is located inside the Airport Land Use Plan’s Safety Zone 6 (Traffic Pattern Zone)14, and well outside the CNEL contours. The proposed Project also does not include residential development, which would require adherence to restrictive development policies provided by the ALUC. The Tulare County Airport Land Use Compatibility Matrix identifies “warehouse, wholesale and distributing” as well as “industrial manufacturing” and “indoor processes” as compatible land uses within Safety Zone 6. Therefore, there is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
14 Tulare County Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan. December 2012. https://tularecounty.ca.gov/rma/rma-documents/planningdocuments/tulare-county-comprehensive-airport-land-use-plan/. Accessed January 2022. 119
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Induce substantial population growth in
an area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The State Department of Finance, which provides population projections for cities and counties in California, estimated Woodlake’s population to be 8,054 on January 1, 202115, up from the 2011 census figure of 7,316.

The proposed Project is located in an area dominated by agricultural, rural residential and industrial uses. The nearest residences are approximately 0.3 miles to the north and south.

RESPONSES
a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
15 City of Woodlake General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report. Page 21. 120
No Impact. There are no new homes associated with the proposed Project and there are no residential structures currently on-site. The proposed Project would be an industrial operation that would provide new jobs in the Woodlake area, which could be readily filled by the existing employment base, given the City’s existing unemployment rates. The proposed Project will not affect any regional population, housing, or employment projections anticipated by City policy documents. There is no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
121
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities,
the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the
public services:

Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project site is located in an area that is already served by public service systems. The City of Woodlake Fire Department provides the City and the surrounding area with fire protection services. The Fire Department is just over one mile northeast of the proposed Project site. The Woodlake Police Department is located approximately 1.3 miles northeast of the proposed Project site. The Woodlake Unified School District and Tulare County Office of Education serves the Project area and the City provides several types of parks and other public facilities.

RESPONSES
122
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:

Fire protection?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project site will continue to be served by the City of Woodlake Fire Department, which is just over one mile northeast of the proposed Project site. The City of Woodlake Fire Department has reviewed the proposed Project and determined that no additional fire personnel or equipment is anticipated. The impact is less than significant.

Police Protection?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project will continue to be served by the City of Woodlake police department. No additional police personnel or equipment is anticipated. The impact is less than significant.

Schools?
No Impact. The direct increase in demand for schools is normally associated with new residential projects that bring new families with school-aged children to a region. The proposed Project does not contain any residential uses. The proposed Project, therefore, would not result in an influx of new students in the Project area and is not expected to result in an increased demand upon District resources and would not require the construction of new facilities. There is no impact.

Parks?
No Impact. The Project would not result in an increase in demand for parks and recreation facilities because it would not result in an increase in population. Accordingly, the proposed Project would have no impacts on parks.

Other public facilities?
No Impact. The proposed Project is within the land use and growth projections identified in the City’s General Plan and other infrastructure studies. The Project, therefore, would not result in increased demand for, or impacts on, other public facilities such as library services. Accordingly, no impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
123
XVI. RECREATION
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of Woodlake currently has two developed park sites and one privately owned park site, located in Olivewood Estates. Willow Court Park, containing 3.91 acres, contains a baseball filed, playground equipment and a low elevation area designated for storm water detention. Miller-Brown Park, containing

6.74 acres, houses playground equipment, picnic arbors, a skate park feature, and a basketball court. A small watercourse traverses the area. In addition to the city's parks, the athletic fields on the campuses of Woodlake’s two school districts provide recreational opportunities after school hours.

RESPONSES
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The proposed Project does not include the construction of residential uses and would not directly or indirectly induce population growth. Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause physical deterioration of existing recreational facilities from increased usage or result in the need for new or expanded recreational facilities. The Project would have no impact to existing parks. 124
Mitigation Measures: None are required.
125
XVII. TRANSPORTATION/

TRAFFIC
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
d. Result in inadequate emergency access?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed Project is located at the South East Corner of Ave 342 & Road 204. Woodlake is bisected by SR 216 and SR 245 and the City is situated five miles north of SR 198. The proposed Project includes constructing and operating an 113-acre industrial center, with seventeen buildings ranging in size of 75,000 sf to 87,000 sf for a total of up to 1,500,000 sf of industrial space, that will house various industrial uses allowable by the zone district, including cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, retail and distribution.

RESPONSES
a. Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
126
Potentially Significant Impact. Project related traffic generation could potentially have significant impacts to local and regional transportation systems. Additionally, VMT generation could potentially conflict with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 and as such, these impact areas will be analyzed in the forthcoming EIR.
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d. Result in inadequate emergency access?
Less than Significant Impact. No roadway design features associated with this proposed Project would result in an increase in hazards due to a design feature or be an incompatible use. There are two points of ingress/egress to the proposed Project site and each of these points will be sized appropriately for emergency vehicles. As such, the proposed Project has been appropriately designed for emergency access. Any impacts would be considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
127
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource,
defined in Public Resources Code section
21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of
the landscape, sacred place, or object with
cultural value to a California Native
American tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k), or
ii. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code section 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of the Public
Resources Code section 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe.
128

REGULATORY SETTING
Tribal Consultation Requirements: SB 18 (Burton, 2004) 16 On September 29, 2004, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Senate Bill 18, Tribal Consultation Guidelines, into law. This bill amended Section 815.3 of the Civil Code, to amend Sections 65040.2, 65092, 65351, 65352, and 65560 of, and to add Sections 65352.3, 65352.4, and 65562.2 to, the Government Code, relating to traditional tribal cultural Places. SB 18, enacted March 1, 2005, creates a mechanism for California Native American Tribes to identify culturally significant sites that are located within public or private lands within the city or county’s jurisdiction. SB 18 requires cities and counties to contact, and offer to consult with, California Native American Tribes before adopting or amending a General Plan, a Specific Plan, or when designating land as Open Space, for the purpose of protecting Native American Cultural Places (PRC 5097.9 and 5097.993). The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) provides local governments with a consultation list of tribal governments with traditional lands or cultural places located within the Project Area of Potential Effect. Tribes have 90 days from the date on which they receive notification to request consultation, unless a shorter timeframe has been agreed to by the tribe.

Tribal Consultation Requirements: AB 52 (Gatto, 2014)17 This bill was approved by Governor Brown on September 25, 2014 and became effective July 1, 2015. This bill amended Section 5097.94 of, and to add Sections 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2, and 21084.3 to, the Public Resources Code, relating to Native Americans. The bill specifies that a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, as defined, is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. This bill requires a lead agency to begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated (can be a tribe anywhere within the State of California) with the geographic area of the proposed project, if the tribe requested to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the lead agency of proposed projects in that geographic area and the tribe requests consultation, prior to determining whether a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report is required for a project.
16 Senate Bill No. 18, Chapter 905. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=200320040SB18. Accessed September 2022.
17 Assembly Bill No. 52, Chapter 532. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB52, Accessed September 2022.
129

RESPONSES
a). Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Less than Significant Impact. A Tribal Cultural Resource (TCR) is defined under Public Resources Code section 21074 as a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of size and scope, sacred place, and object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either included and that is listed or eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historic Resources or in a local register of historical resources, or if the City of Woodlake, acting as the Lead Agency, supported by substantial evidence, chooses at its discretion to treat the resource as a TCR. As discussed above, under Section V, Cultural Resources, criteria (b) and (d), no known archeological resources, ethnographic sites or Native American remains are located on the proposed Project site. As discussed under criterion (b) implementation of Mitigation Measure CULT-1 would reduce impacts to unknown archaeological deposits, including TCRs, to a less than significant level. As discussed under criterion (d), compliance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 would reduce the likelihood of disturbing or discovering human remains, including those of Native Americans.

The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) has performed a Sacred Lands File search for sites located on or near the Project site, with negative results. The NAHC also provided a consultation list of tribal governments with traditional lands or cultural places located within the project area. An opportunity has been provided to Native American tribes listed by the Native American Heritage Commission during the CEQA process as required by AB 52. No responses were received by the City in response to the consultation request within the mandatory response timeframes; therefore, this Initial Study has been completed consistent and compliant with AB 52. Any impacts to TCR would be considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
130
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?
c. Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project’s
projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local infrastructure, or
otherwise impair the attainment of solid
waste reduction goals?
e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
131
The Visalia Landfill plant is approximately 15 miles west of the proposed Project site, while the Woodlake Wastewater Treatment Plant is located just under a mile southeast of the site.

RESPONSES
a. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project includes the construction and operation of an industrial park with seventeen buildings ranging in size of 75,000 sf to 87,000 sf for a total of up to 1,500,000 sf of industrial space. The Project also includes construction of internal access roads, 700 parking spaces and associated landscaping. The Project will tie into the existing City water and wastewater systems and will keep stormwater on-site via three stormwater basins constructed as part of the Project. Any grow operations will utilize the existing well connection for water. The proposed Project would be served by Mid-Valley Disposal for solid waste disposal. The City’s water system and solid waste disposal programs have capacity for, or are planned to maintain capacity for, community growth in accordance with the adopted General Plan. Any impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
132
XX. WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility
areas or lands classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project occupants to,
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power
lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the environment?
d. Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Human activities such as smoking, debris burning, and equipment operation are the major causes of wildland fires. Within Tulare County, over 1,029,130 acres (33% of the total area) are classified as “Very High” fire threat and approximately 454,680 acres (15% of the total area) are classified as “High” fire threat. The portion of the county that transitions from the valley floor into the foothills and mountains is characterized by high to very high threat of wildland fires.18 While the City of Woodlake is nestled at the 18 Tulare County General Plan Background Report. February 2010. Page 8-21. 133
base of the foothills, the majority of the City is developed into urban uses or in active agriculture, severely reducing the risk of wildland fire. According to the Tulare County Background Report Figure 8-2, the majority of the City has no threat of wildfire. The proposed Project site is relatively flat in an area actively utilized with primarily industrial and agricultural uses.

RESPONSES
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d. Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project is located in an area developed with industrial and agricultural uses, which precludes the risk of wildfire. The area is flat in nature which would limit the risk of downslope flooding and landslides, and limit any wildfire spread.

To receive building permits, the proposed Project would be required to be in compliance with the adopted emergency response plan. As such, any wildfire risk to the project structures or people would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
134
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF

SIGNIFICANCE
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
135

RESPONSES
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Potentially Significant Impact. The analyses of environmental issues contained in this Initial Study indicate that the proposed Project may have substantial impact on the environment or on any resources identified in the Initial Study. Mitigation measures have been incorporated in the project design, however some impacts remain potentially significant. Therefore, an EIR will be prepared to further analyze potentially significant impact areas. b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Potentially Significant Impact. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(i) states that a Lead Agency shall consider whether the cumulative impact of a project is significant and whether the effects of the project are cumulatively considerable. The assessment of the significance of the cumulative effects of a project must, therefore, be conducted in connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects. The proposed Project may contribute substantially to adverse cumulative conditions, or create any substantial indirect impacts (i.e., increase in population could lead to an increase need for housing, increase in traffic, air pollutants, etc).

Mitigation measures have been incorporated in the project design, however some impacts remain potentially significant. Therefore, an EIR will be prepared to further analyze potentially significant impact areas.
136
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Potentially Significant Impact. The analyses of environmental issues contained in this Initial Study indicate that the project may have substantial impact on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Mitigation measures have been incorporated in the project design, however some impacts remain potentially significant. Therefore, an EIR will be prepared for those impact areas.

LIST OF PREPARERS
Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
• Emily Bowen, LEED AP, Principal Environmental Planner • Travis Crawford, AICP, Principal Environmental Planner • Deepesh Tourani, Environmental Planner
Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC.
• Jeff Davis, Principal Biologist
Persons and Agencies Consulted
City of Woodlake
• Rebecca Griswold, Community Services Director
• Ramon Lara, City Administrator
California Historic Resources Information System
• Celeste Thomson, Coordinator
Native American Heritage Commission
• Andrew Green, Staff Services Analyst
137
Appendix A
Biological Resource Evaluation
138

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE

EVALUATION

January 2022

WOODLAKE INDUSTRIAL PARK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED FOR:

Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
113 N. Church Street, Suite 302
Visalia, CA 93291
PREPARED BY:

Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC
9493 N Fort Washington Road, Suite 108
Fresno, CA 93730
www.colibri-ecology.com
139
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development Project January 2022 i
Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................iv Abbreviations...................................................................................................................................... v

1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1

1.3 Project Location ................................................................................................................... 1

1.4 Purpose and Need of Proposed Project .............................................................................. 4

1.5 Regulatory Framework ........................................................................................................ 4

1.5.1 State Requirements ...................................................................................................... 4

1.5.2 Federal Requirements .................................................................................................. 6

2.0 Methods.................................................................................................................................. 8

2.1 Desktop Review.................................................................................................................... 8

2.2 Reconnaissance Survey........................................................................................................ 8

2.3 Significance Criteria ............................................................................................................. 8

3.0 Results.................................................................................................................................. 11

3.1 Desktop Review................................................................................................................. 11

3.2 Reconnaissance Survey..................................................................................................... 21

3.2.1 Land Use and Habitats .............................................................................................. 21

3.2.2 Plant and Animal Species Observed .......................................................................... 24

3.2.3 Nesting Birds.............................................................................................................. 26

3.2.4 Regulated Habitats.................................................................................................... 26 140
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development Project January 2022 ii

3.3 Special-Status Species....................................................................................................... 26

3.3.1 San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica, FE, ST) ................................................ 26

3.3.2 Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia, SSSC)................................................................ 27

3.3.3 Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus, SSSC)......................................................................... 27

3.3.4 Western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus, SSSC)......................................... 28

4.1 Significance Determinations ............................................................................................. 29

4.1.1 Direct and Indirect Impacts ....................................................................................... 29

4.1.2 Cumulative Effects ..................................................................................................... 31

4.1.3 Unavoidable Significant Adverse Effects................................................................... 32

5.0 Literature Cited.................................................................................................................... 33 Figures
Figure 1. Project site vicinity map. ..................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Project site map. .................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3. Reconnaissance survey area map. ................................................................................... 10 Figure 4. CNDDB occurrence map. .................................................................................................. 20 Figure 5. Photograph of the Project site, looking northwest, showing industrial buildings and stagged construction equipment on a graveled parking area. ....................................................... 21 Figure 6. Photograph of Project site, looking east, showing fallowed agriculture fields dominated by annual grasses and forbs bordered by olive trees. .................................................................... 22 Figure 7. Photograph of the Project site, looking west, showing a mostly barren field with active construction..................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 8. Photograph of Antelope Creek east of the Project site, showing ground squirrel burrows on its banks. ..................................................................................................................................... 23 Figure 9. Photograph of the Project site, showing one of four retention ponds. .......................... 23 141
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development Project January 2022 iii
Tables
Table 1. Special-status species, their listing status, habitats, and potential to occur on or near the Project site. ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Table 2. Plant and animal species observed during the reconnaissance survey. ........................... 24 Appendices
Appendix A. USFWS list of threatened and endangered species. ….………………..…………….……...……36 Appendix B. CNDDB occurrence records. .…………………………………………………………….……………..….….44 Appendix C. CNPS plant list. ….…………………………………………………………………….………….…………....…..50 142
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development Project January 2022 iv
Executive Summary
The project applicant proposes to construct 17 buildings totaling 1,329,000 square feet and 700 parking stalls in the City of Woodlake, Tulare County, California. The proposed industrial park development project (Project) will involve construction on an approximately 116-acre parcel that currently supports industrial buildings with graveled parking areas and fallowed agricultural land.

To evaluate whether the Project may affect biological resources under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) purview, we (1) obtained lists of special-status species from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the California Native Plant Society; (2) reviewed other relevant background information such as aerial images and topographic maps; and (3) conducted a field reconnaissance survey at the Project site.

This biological resource evaluation summarizes (1) existing biological conditions on the Project site, (2) the potential for special-status species and regulated habitats to occur on or near the Project site, (3) the potential impacts of the proposed Project on biological resources and regulated habitats, and (4) measures to reduce those potential impacts to less-than-significant levels under CEQA.

We concluded the Project could affect four special-status wildlife species: the federally listed as endangered and state listed as threatened San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica), the state species of special concern burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), the state species of special concern pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), and the state species of special concern Western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus). Nesting migratory birds could also be impacted. Impacts to all species can be reduced to less-than-significant levels with mitigation. 143
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development Project January 2022 v
Abbreviations
Abbreviation Definition
CCR California Code of Regulations
CDFG California Department of Fish and Game
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CESA California Endangered Species Act
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFGC California Fish and Game Code
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
CNPS California Native Plant Society
FCE Federal Candidate for Endangered listing under the FESA FE Federally listed as Endangered
FESA Federal Endangered Species Act
FP State Fully Protected
FT Federally listed as Threatened
MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Science
SE State listed as Endangered
SSSC State Species of Special Concern
ST State listed as Threatened
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers
USC United States Code
USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service
USGS United States Geological Survey
144
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
1 1.0 Introduction

1.1 Background
The project applicant proposes to construct an industrial park development project (the Project) on an approximately 116-acre property within the City of Woodlake, Tulare County, California.

The property currently supports industrial buildings, graveled parking areas, retention ponds, and fallowed agricultural land.

The purpose of this biological resource evaluation is to assess whether the Project will affect protected biological resources pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. Such resources include species of plants or animals listed or proposed for listing under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) or the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) as well as those covered under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), the California Native Plant Protection Act, and various other sections of California Fish and Game Code (CFGC). This biological resource evaluation also addresses Project-related impacts to regulated habitats, which are those under the jurisdiction of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), or California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW).

1.2 Project Description
The Project will involve constructing 17 buildings totaling 1,329,000 square feet and 700 parking stalls and expanding a water retention pond.

1.3 Project Location
The approximately 116-acre Project site is in the City of Woodlake, Tulare County, California (Figure 1). The Project site is on the southeast corner of South Blair Road and Avenue 342, west of Antelope Creek (Figure 2).
145
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
2 Figure 1. Project site vicinity map.
146
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
3 Figure 2. Project site map.
147
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
4 1.4 Purpose and Need of Proposed Project
The purpose of the Project is to provide commercial development opportunities to meet growing community and commercial needs in Woodlake and Tulare County.

1.5 Regulatory Framework
The relevant state and federal regulatory requirements and policies that guide the impact analysis of the Project are summarized below.

1.5.1 State Requirements
California Department of Fish and Wildlife Jurisdiction. The CDFW has regulatory jurisdiction over lakes and streams in California. Activities that divert or obstruct the natural flow of a stream; substantially change its bed, channel, or bank; or use any materials (including vegetation) from the streambed, may require that the project applicant enter into a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFW in accordance with California Fish and Game Code (CFGC) Section 1602.

California Endangered Species Act. The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) of 1970 (Fish and Game Code § 2050 et seq., and California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 14, Subsection 670.2, 670.51) prohibits the take of species listed under CESA (14 CCR Subsection 670.2, 670.5).

Take is defined as hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill. Under CESA, state agencies are required to consult with the CDFW when preparing CEQA documents. Consultation ensures that proposed projects or actions do not have a negative effect on state listed species. During consultation, CDFW determines whether take would occur and identifies “reasonable and prudent alternatives” for the project and conservation of specialstatus species. CDFW can authorize take of state listed species under Sections 2080.1 and 2081(b) of the CFGC in those cases where it is demonstrated that the impacts are minimized and mitigated. Take authorized under section 2081(b) must be minimized and fully mitigated. A CESA permit must be obtained if a project will result in take of listed species, either during construction or over the life of the project. Under CESA, CDFW is responsible for maintaining a list of threatened and endangered species designated under state law (Fish and Game Code § 2070).

CDFW also maintains lists of species of special concern, which serve as “watch lists.” Pursuant to the requirements of CESA, a state or local agency reviewing a proposed project within its jurisdiction must determine whether the proposed project will have a potentially significant impact upon such species. Project-related impacts to species on the CESA list would be considered significant and would require mitigation. Impacts to species of concern or fully protected species would be considered significant under certain circumstances.

California Environmental Quality Act. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (Subsections 21000–21178) requires that CDFW be consulted during the CEQA review process 148
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
5 regarding impacts of proposed projects on special-status species. Special-status species are defined under CEQA Guidelines subsection 15380(b) and (d) as those listed under FESA and CESA and species that are not currently protected by statute or regulation but would be considered rare, threatened, or endangered under these criteria or by the scientific community. Therefore, species considered rare or endangered are addressed in this biological resource evaluation regardless of whether they are afforded protection through any other statute or regulation. The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) inventories the native flora of California and ranks species according to rarity (CNPS 2022). Plants with Rare Plant Ranks 1A, 1B, 2A, or 2B are considered special-status species under CEQA.

Although threatened and endangered species are protected by specific federal and state statutes, CEQA Guidelines Section 15380(d) provides that a species not listed on the federal or state list of protected species may be considered rare or endangered if it can be shown to meet certain specified criteria. These criteria have been modeled after the definition in the FESA and the section of the CFGC dealing with rare and endangered plants and animals. Section 15380(d) allows a public agency to undertake a review to determine if a significant effect on species that have not yet been listed by either the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFW) or CDFW (i.e., candidate species) would occur. Thus, CEQA provides an agency with the ability to protect a species from the potential impacts of a project until the respective government agency has an opportunity to designate the species as protected, if warranted.

California Native Plant Protection Act. The California Native Plant Protection Act of 1977 (CFGC §§ 1900–1913) requires all state agencies to use their authority to carry out programs to conserve endangered and otherwise rare species of native plants. Provisions of the act prohibit the taking of listed plants from the wild and require the project proponent to notify CDFW at least 10 days in advance of any change in land use, which allows CDFW to salvage listed plants that would otherwise be destroyed.

Nesting birds. CFGC Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 prohibit the possession, incidental take, or needless destruction of birds, their nests, and eggs. CFGC Section 3511 lists birds that are “Fully Protected” as those that may not be taken or possessed except under specific permit.

Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (California Water Code § 13000 et. sec.) was established in 1969 and entrusts the SWRCB and nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (collectively Water Boards) with the responsibility to preserve and enhance all beneficial uses of California’s diverse waters. The Act grants the Water Boards authority to establish water quality objectives and regulate point- and nonpoint-source pollution discharge to the state’s surface and ground waters. Under the auspices of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Water Boards are responsible for certifying, under Section 401 of the federal Clean Water Act, that activities affecting waters of the United States comply California water quality standards. The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act addresses all “waters of the State,” which are more broadly defined than waters of the Unites States. Waters of the State include any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the state. They include artificial as well as natural water bodies and 149
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
6 federally jurisdictional and federally non-jurisdictional waters. The Water Boards may issue a Waste Discharge Requirement permit for projects that will affect only federally non-jurisdictional waters of the State.

1.5.2 Federal Requirements
Federal Endangered Species Act. The USFWS and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Association and National Marine Fisheries Service enforce the provisions stipulated in the FESA of 1973 (FESA, 16 United States Code [USC] § 1531 et seq.). Threatened and endangered species on the federal list (50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 17.11 and 17.12) are protected from take unless a Section 10 permit is granted to an entity other than a federal agency or a Biological Opinion with incidental take provisions is rendered to a federal lead agency via a Section 7 consultation. Take is defined as harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect or attempt to engage in any such conduct. Pursuant to the requirements of the FESA, an agency reviewing a proposed action within its jurisdiction must determine whether any federally listed species may be present in the proposed action area and determine whether the proposed action may affect such species. Under the FESA, habitat loss is considered an effect to a species.

In addition, the agency is required to determine whether the proposed action is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any species that is listed or proposed for listing under the FESA (16 USC § 1536[3], [4]). Therefore, proposed action-related effects to these species or their habitats would be considered significant and would require mitigation.

Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The federal MBTA (16 USC § 703, Supp. I, 1989) prohibits killing, possessing, trading, or other forms of take of migratory birds except in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior. “Take” is defined as the pursuing, hunting, shooting, capturing, collecting, or killing of birds, their nests, eggs, or young (16 USC § 703 and § 715n). This act encompasses whole birds, parts of birds, and bird nests and eggs. The MBTA specifically protects migratory bird nests from possession, sale, purchase, barter transport, import, and export, and take. For nests, the definition of take per 50 CFR 10.12 is to collect. The MBTA does not include a definition of an “active nest.” However, the “Migratory Bird Permit Memorandum” issued by the USFWS in 2003 and updated in 2018 clarifies the MBTA in that regard and states that the removal of nests, without eggs or birds, is legal under the MBTA, provided no possession (which is interpreted as holding the nest with the intent of retaining it) occurs during the destruction (USFWS 2018).

United States Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdiction. Areas meeting the regulatory definition of “waters of the United States” (jurisdictional waters) are subject to the jurisdiction of the USACE under provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (1972) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (1899). These waters may include all waters used, or potentially used, for interstate commerce, including all waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, all interstate waters, all other waters (intrastate lakes, rivers, streams, mudflats, sandflats, playa lakes, natural ponds, etc.), all impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States, tributaries of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States, the territorial seas, and wetlands 150
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
7 adjacent to waters of the United States (33 CFR part 328.3). Ditches and drainage canals where water flows intermittently or ephemerally are not regulated as waters of the United States.

Wetlands on non-agricultural lands are identified using the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and related Regional Supplement (USACE 1987 and 2008). Construction activities, including direct removal, filling, hydrologic disruption, or other means in jurisdictional waters are regulated by the USACE. The placement of dredged or fill material into such waters must comply with permit requirements of the USACE. No USACE permit will be effective in the absence of state water quality certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The SWRCB is the state agency (together with the Regional Water Quality Control Boards) charged with implementing water quality certification in California.

151
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
8 2.0 Methods

2.1 Desktop Review
As a framework for the evaluation and reconnaissance survey, we obtained an official USFWS species list for the Project (USFWS 2022a, Appendix A). In addition, we searched the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB, CDFW 2022, Appendix B) and the CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (CNPS 2022, Appendix C) for records of special-status plant and animal species from the vicinity of the Project site. Regional lists of special-status species were compiled using USFWS, CNDDB, and CNPS database searches confined to the Woodlake 7.5-minute United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle, which encompasses the Project site, and the eight surrounding quadrangles (Auckland, Shadequarter Mountain, Kaweah, Chickencoop Canyon, Rocky Hill, Exeter, Ivanhoe, and Stokes Mountain). A local list of specialstatus species was compiled using CNDDB records from within 5 miles of the Project site. Species that lack a special-status designation by state or federal regulatory agencies or public interest groups were omitted from the final list. Species for which the Project site does not provide habitat were eliminated from further consideration. We also reviewed aerial imagery from Google Earth (Google 2022) and other sources, USGS topographic maps, the Web Soil Survey (NRCS 2022), the National Wetlands Inventory (USFWS 2022b), and relevant literature.

2.2 Reconnaissance Survey
Associate Scientist Kristine Harman conducted a field reconnaissance survey of the Project site on 13 January 2022. The Project site and a 50-foot buffer surrounding the Project site (Figure 3) were walked and thoroughly inspected to evaluate and document the potential for the area to support state- or federally protected resources. All plants except those under cultivation or planted in residential areas and all vertebrate wildlife species observed within the survey area were identified and documented. The survey area was evaluated for the presence of regulated habitats, including lakes, streams, and other waters using methods described in the Wetlands Delineation Manual and regional supplement (USACE 1987, 2008) and as defined by the CDFW (https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/conservation/lsa) or under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act.

2.3 Significance Criteria
CEQA defines “significant effect on the environment” as “a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment” (California Public Resource Code § 21068). Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15065, a Project’s effects on biological resources are deemed significant where the Project would do the following:
a) Substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, 152
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
9 b) Cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, c) Threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or d) Substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal.

In addition to the Section 15065 criteria, Appendix G within the CEQA Guidelines includes six additional impacts to consider when analyzing the effects of a project. Under Appendix G, a project’s effects on biological resources are deemed significant where the project would do any of the following:
e) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS; f) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS;
g) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means;
h) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites;
i) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance; or
j) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

These criteria were used to determine whether the potential effects of the Project on biological resources qualify as significant.

153
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
10 Figure 3. Reconnaissance survey area map.
154
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
11 3.0 Results

3.1 Desktop Review
The USFWS species list for the Project included 13 species listed as threatened, endangered, or candidate under the FESA (USFWS 2022a, Table 1, Appendix A). Of those 13 species, 12 species could not occur on or near the Project site due to either (1) the lack of habitat, (2) the Project site being outside the current range of the species, or (3) the presence of development that would otherwise preclude occurrence (Table 1). The remaining species, San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica – FE, ST), could occur on or near the Project site. As identified in the species list, the Project site does not occur in USFWS-designated or proposed critical habitat for any species (USFWS 2022a, Appendix A).

Searching the CNDDB for records of special-status species from the Woodlake 7.5-minute USGS topographic quad and the eight surrounding quads produced 208 records of 46 species (Table 1, Appendix B). Of those 46 species, eight are not given further consideration because they are not recognized as special-status species by state or federal regulatory agencies or public interest groups or are considered extirpated in California (Appendix B). Of the remaining 38 species, 16 are known from within 5 miles of the Project site (Table 1, Figure 4). Of those species, San Joaquin kit fox (mentioned above) and western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus – SSSC) could occur on or near the Project site (Table 1). In addition, burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia – SSSC) and pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus – SSSC) were identified in the nine-quad search and could occur on or near the Project site (Table 1).

Searching the CNPS inventory of rare and endangered plants of California yielded 20 species (CNPS 2022, Appendix C), one of which has a rank of 2B, and 19 of which have a rank of 1B (Table 1). None of those species are expected to occur on or near the Project site due to lack of habitat (Table 1).

The Project site is underlain by San Joaquin loam, San Emigdio loam, and Yettem sandy loam with 0 to 9% slopes (NCRS 2022). The Project site is at an elevation of 424–447 feet above mean sea level (Google 2022).
155
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
12 Table 1. Special-status species, their listing status, habitats, and potential to occur on or near the Project site.

Species Status1 Habitat Potential to Occur2
Federally and State-Listed Endangered or Threatened Species Greene’s tuctoria3
(Tuctoria greenei)
FE,
1B.1
Vernal pools in open
grasslands below 3445
feet elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site lacked
vernal pools.

Hoover’s spurge
(Euphorbia spurge)
FT,
1B.2
Vernal pools and
depressions.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site lacked
vernal pools.

Kaweah brodiaea
(Brodiaea insignis)
SE,
1B.2
Valley and foothill
grassland, meadows,
and cismontane
woodlands with
granitic or clay soils.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
industrial land cover.

San Joaquin adobe sunburst3
(Pseudobahia peirsonii)

FT, SE,
1B.1
Grassland and bare
dark clay.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
industrial land cover
and lacked clay soils.

San Joaquin valley orcutt grass3
(Orcuttia inaequalis)

FT, SE,
1B.1
Vernal pools at or
below 2700 feet
elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site lacked
vernal pools.

Striped adobe-lily
(Fritillaria striata)
ST,
1B.1
Adobe clay soils at or
below 3280 ft
elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
industrial land cover
and lacked clay soils.

Monarch California overwintering
population
(Danaus plexippus)
FCE Groves of trees within

1.5 miles of the ocean
that produce suitable
micro-climates for
overwintering such as
high humidity,
dappled sunlight,
access to water and
nectar, and protection
from wind.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is not
within 1.5 miles of the
ocean.
156
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
13 Valley elderberry longhorn beetle3
(Desmocerus californicus
dimorphus)
FT Elderberry (Sambucus
sp.) plants with stems
> 1-inch diameter at
ground level.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site lacked
elderberry plants and
is outside the
currently recognized
range of this species.

Conservancy fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta conservatio)
FE Vernal pools and
depressions.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site lacked
vernal pools.

Vernal pool fairy shrimp3
(Branchinecta lynchi)
FT Vernal pools and
ponds.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site lacked
vernal pools.

Vernal pool tadpole shrimp
(Lepidurus packardi)
FE Vernal pools, clay
flats, alkaline pools,
and ephemeral stock
tanks.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is
outside the current
known range of this
species.

Delta smelt
(Hypomesus transpacificus)
FT, SE Shallow, fresh or
slightly brackish
backwater sloughs
and edgewaters.

None. Habitat lacking;
Project site lacked
connectivity to the
aquatic habitat this
species requires.

Blunt-nosed leopard lizard
(Gambelia sila)
FE, SE Upland scrub and
sparsely vegetated
grassland with small
mammal burrows
below 2400 feet
elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
industrial land cover.

California red-legged frog
(Rana draytonii)
FT,
SSSC
Creeks, ponds, and
marshes for breeding;
burrows for upland
refuge.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is
outside the current
known range of this
species.

California tiger salamander3
(Ambystoma californiense)
FT, ST Vernal pools or
seasonal ponds for
breeding; small
mammal burrows for
upland refugia in
natural grassland or
oak woodland.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
industrial landcover
and is outside the
current known local
range of this species.
157
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
14 Foothill yellow-legged frog3
(Rana boylii)
SE,
SSSC
Perennial streams and
rivers with rocky
substrates, and with
open, sunny banks
may be in forests,
chaparral, or
woodlands.

None. Habitat lacking;
Antelope Creek on the
Project site was dry
and lacked rocky
substrates; the
Project site is outside
the current known
local range of this
species.

Giant garter snake
(Thamnophis gigas)
FT, ST Marshes, sloughs,
ponds, or other
permanent sources of
water with emergent
vegetation, and grassy
banks or open areas
during active season;
uplands with
underground refuges
or crevices during
inactive season.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is
outside the current
known range of this
species.

Bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
SE, FP Large old-growth
trees or snags in
remote, mixed stands
near water.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
industrial land cover.

California condor
(Gymnogyps californianus)
FE, SE Mountain and foothill
rangeland with cliffs
for nesting and
grassland and open
woodland for
foraging.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
industrial land cover.

Tricolored blackbird3
(Agelaius tricolor)
ST,
SSSC
Large freshwater
marshes, in dense
stands of cattails or
bulrushes.

None. Habitat lacking;
Antelope Creek
bordering the Project
site lacked dense
stands of cattails or
bulrushes.

Willow flycatcher
(Empidonax traillii)
SE Moist meadows with
perennial streams and
lowland riparian
woodlands dominated
by willows and
cottonwoods for
breeding, willows or
None. Habitat lacking;
Antelope Creek
bordering the Project
site lacked willows or
cottonwood.
158
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
15 other shrubs near
standing or running
water; shrubby
clearings, pastures,
and woodland edges
often near water.

Fisher
(Pekania pennanti)

FE, ST,
SSSC
Large areas of mature,
dense forest with snags
and greater than 50%
canopy closure.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
industrial land cover.

San Joaquin kit fox3
(Vulpes macrotis mutica)
FE, ST Grassland, upland
scrub, and fallowed
agricultural lands
adjacent to grassland
or upland scrub.

Low. The Project site
included fallowed
agricultural land and
is adjacent to
disturbed grassland to
the east.

State Species of Special Concern
Northern leopard frog
(Lithobates pipiens)
SSSC Wet meadows, canals,
bogs, marshes, and
reservoirs in
grassland, forest, and
woodland.

None. Outside current
known local range.

Northern California legless lizard
(Anniella pulchra)
SSSC Moist warm loose soil
with plant cover in
beach dunes,
chaparral, pine-oak
woodlands, sandy
areas and stream
terraces.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
industrial land cover.

Northwestern pond turtle
(Actinemys marmorata)
SSSC Ponds, rivers,
marshes, streams, and
irrigation ditches,
usually with aquatic
vegetation and woody
debris for basking and
adjacent natural
upland areas for egg
laying.

None. Habitat lacking;
Antelope Creek
bordering the Project
site was dry and
lacked aquatic
vegetation and woody
debris.

Western spadefoot3
(Spea hammondii)
SSSC Rain pools for
breeding and small
mammal burrows or
other suitable refugia
None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
159
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
16 for nonbreeding
upland cover.
industrial land cover;
no records from
within 5 miles.

Burrowing owl
(Athene cunicularia)
SSSC Grassland and upland
scrub with friable soil;
some agricultural or
other developed and
disturbed areas with
ground squirrel
burrows.

Low. Ground squirrel
burrows were present
along Antelope Creek
east of the Project
site.

American badger
(Taxidea taxus)
SSSC Open areas including
meadows, grasslands,
and chaparral with
less than 50% plant
cover.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
industrial land cover.

Pallid bat
(Antrozous pallidus)
SSSC Arid or semi-arid
locations in rocky
areas and sparsely
vegetated grassland
near water. Rock
crevices, caves, mine
shafts, bridges,
building, and tree
hollows for roosting.

Low. The industrial
buildings on the
Project site could
provide roosting
habitat.

Western mastiff bat3
(Eumops perotis californicus)
SSSC Roosts in crevices in
face cliffs, high
buildings, trees, and
tunnels in open semiarid habitats.

Low. Industrial
buildings on the
Project site could
provide roosting
habitat.

California Rare Plants
Alkali-sink goldfields
(Lasthenia chrysantha)
1B.1 Vernal pools and wet
saline flats below 320
feet elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is
above the known
elevational range of
this species.

American manna grass
(Glyceria grandis)
2B.3 Bogs and fens,
meadows and seeps,
marshes and swamps,
and margins of lakes
and streams below
6890 feet elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
Antelope Creek
bordering the Project
site was dry and
based on historical
aerial imagery
(Google 2022) is
usually dry.
160
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
17 Calico monkeyflower3
(Diplacus pictus)
1B.2 Bare, sunny, shrubby
areas around granite
outcrops in the
southern Sierra
Nevada at 442–4100
feet elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is
below the known
elevational range.

Coulter’s goldfields
(Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri)
1B.1 Saltmarsh, playas, and
vernal pools below
4000 feet elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site lacked
vernal pools.

Earlimart orache
(Atriplex cordulata var.
erecticaulis)
1B.2 Saline or alkaline soils
in Central Valley and
foothill grassland
below 230 feet
elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is
above the known
elevational range of
this species.

Kaweah monkeyflower
(Erythranthe norrisii)
1B.3 Marble crevices in the
Kaweah River and
Kings River drainages
at 1969–4265 feet
elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is
below the known
elevational range of
this species.

Lesser saltscale
(Atriplex minuscula)
1B.1 Sandy alkaline soils in
chenopod scrub,
playa, and grassland in
the San Joaquin Valley
below 328 feet
elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is
above the known
elevational range of
this species.

Madera leptosiphon
(Leptosiphon serrulatus)
1B.2 Openings in chaparral,
cismontane
woodland, and low
elevation conifer
forest at 980–4300
feet elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is
below the known
elevational range of
this species.

Mouse buckwheat
(Eriogonum nudum var. murinum)
1B.2 Sandy soils in the
Kaweah River
drainage at 1312–
2300 feet elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is
below the known
elevational range of
this species.

Recurved larkspur3
(Delphinium recurvatum)
1B.2 Poorly drained, fine,
alkaline soils in
chenopod scrub,
cismontane
woodland, and valley
and foothill grassland
None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
industrial land cover.

The occurrence from
161
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
18 at 10–2800 feet
elevation.
within 5 miles is
presumed extirpated.

Sanford’s arrowhead3
(Sagittaria sanfordii)
1B.2 Freshwater marshes
and swamps, including
some canals, below
650 feet elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site
consisted of
agricultural and
industrial land cover;
Antelope Creek
bordering the Project
site was dry and
based on historical
aerial imagery
(Google 2022) is
usually dry.

Spiny-sepaled button-celery3
(Eryngium spinosepalum)
1B.2 Vernal pools and
swales in valley and
foothill grassland at
330–4200 feet
elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site lacked
vernal pools and
swales.

Vernal pool smallscale
(Atriplex persistens)
1B.2 Alkaline vernal pools
in the Central Valley
below 377 feet
elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is
above the known
elevational range of
this species.

Winter’s sunflower3
(Helianthus winteri)
1B.2 Steep, south-facing
grassy slopes, rock
outcrops, and road
cuts at 590–1509 feet
elevation.

None. Habitat lacking;
the Project site is
below the known
elevational range of
this species.

CDFW (2022), CNPS (2022), USFWS (2022).
162
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
19 Status1 Potential to Occur2
FE = Federally listed Endangered None: Species or sign not observed; conditions unsuitable for occurrence.

FT = Federally listed Threatened Low: Neither species nor sign observed; conditions marginal for occurrence.

FP = State Fully Protected Moderate: Neither species nor sign observed; conditions suitable for occurrence.

FCE = Federal Candidate for Endangered listing under the FESA High: Neither species nor sign observed; conditions highly suitable for occurrence.

SE = State listed Endangered Present: Species or sign observed; conditions suitable for occurrence.

ST = State listed Threatened
SSSC = State Species of Special Concern
CNPS California Rare Plant Rank1: Threat Ranks1:
1B – plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere.

0.1 – seriously threatened in California (> 80% of occurrences). 2B – plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California but more common elsewhere.

0.2 – moderately threatened in California (20-80% of occurrences). 3 – plants about which more information is needed. 0.3 – not very threatened in California (<20% of occurrences). 4 – plants have limited distribution in California.
3Record from within 5 miles of the Project site.
163
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
20 Figure 4. CNDDB occurrence map.
164
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
21 3.2 Reconnaissance Survey

3.2.1 Land Use and Habitats
The northern portion of the Project site supported industrial buildings with graveled parking areas and staged construction equipment (Figure 5). The eastern and southern portion of the Project site consisted of fallowed agriculture fields dominated by grasses and forbs and bordered by planted olive trees (Olea europaea; Figure 6). The western portion of the Project site was mostly barren and under construction (Figure 7). Antelope Creek, an evidently usually dry (Google 2022) channelized waterway, bordered the Project site to the east; its banks supported several ground squirrel burrows (Figure 8). The Project site supported four retention ponds, three of which held water at the time of the survey (Figures 2, 3, and 9).

Figure 5. Photograph of the Project site, looking northwest, showing industrial buildings and stagged construction equipment on a graveled parking area. 165
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
22 Figure 6. Photograph of Project site, looking east, showing fallowed agriculture fields dominated by annual grasses and forbs bordered by olive trees.

Figure 7. Photograph of the Project site, looking west, showing a mostly barren field with active construction.
166
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
23 Figure 8. Photograph of Antelope Creek east of the Project site, showing ground squirrel burrows on its banks.

Figure 9. Photograph of the Project site, showing one of four retention ponds. 167
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
24 3.2.2 Plant and Animal Species Observed
A total of 25 plant species (five native and 20 nonnative) and 10 bird species were observed during the survey (Table 2).

Table 2. Plant and animal species observed during the reconnaissance survey.

Common Name Scientific Name Status
Plants
Family Amaranthaceae
Pigweed amaranth Amaranthus albus Nonnative
Family Asteraceae
Common sunflower Helianthus annuus Native
Prickly lettuce Lactuca serriola Nonnative
Milk thistle Silybum marianum Nonnative
Family Bignoniaceae
Catalpa Catalpa sp. Nonnative
Family Brassicaceae
Mustard Sisymbrium sp. Nonnative
Radish Raphanus sp. Nonnative
Family Chenopodiaceae
Russian thistle Salsola tragus Nonnative
White goosefoot Chenopodium album Nonnative
Family Fabaceae
White clover Trifolium repens Nonnative
Family Geraniaceae
Longbeak stork’s bill Erodium botrys Nonnative
Redstem stork’s bill Erodium cicutarium Nonnative
Family Lamiaceae
White horehound Marrubium vulgare Nonnative
Family Malvaceae
Cheeseweed Malva parviflora Nonnative
Family Montiaceae
Narrow leaved miner’s lettuce Claytonia parviflora Native Family Oleaceae
Olive Olea europaea Nonnative
168
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
25 Family Plantaginaceae
Narrow leaved plantain Plantago lanceolata Nonnative
Family Poaceae
Ripgut brome Bromus diandrus Nonnative
Salt grass Distichlis spicata Native
Wild oat Avena fatua Nonnative
Family Polygonaceae
Prostrate knotweed Polygonum aviculare Nonnative
Family Salicaceae
Willow Salix sp. Native
Family Solanaceae
Jimsonweed Datura wrightii Native
Silverleaf nightshade Solanum elaeagnifolium Nonnative
Family Zygophyllaceae
Puncture vine Tribulus terrestris Nonnative
Birds
Family Accipitridae
Red-tailed hawk Buteo jamaicensis MBTA, CFGC
Family Anatidae
Canada Goose Branta canadensis MBTA, CFGC
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos MBTA, CFGC
Family Charadriidae
Killdeer Charadrius vociferus MBTA, CFGC
Family Corvidae
American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos MBTA, CFGC
Family Fringillidae
House finch Haemorhous mexicanus MBTA, CFGC
Family Mimidae
Northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos MBTA, CFGC
Family Passerellidae
White-crowned sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys MBTA, CFGC Family Passeridae
House sparrow Passer domesticus --
Family Trochilidae
Anna's hummingbird Calypte anna MBTA, CFGC
MBTA = Protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC § 703 et seq.); CFGC = Protected under the California Fish and Game Code (FGC §§ 3503 and 3513).
169
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
26 3.2.3 Nesting Birds
Migratory birds could nest on or near the Project site. Bird species that may nest on or near the Project site include, but are not limited to, the house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus) and northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos).

3.2.4 Regulated Habitats
The channelized Antelope Creek was within 50 feet of the Project site. As a stream in California, it is under the regulatory jurisdiction of the CDFW; as a potential surface water in California, it may be under the regulatory jurisdiction of the SWRCB; and as a potential tributary of the St Johns River, it may be under the regulatory jurisdiction of the USACE. In addition, four retention ponds were on the Project site (Figures 2 and 3). Although these represent surface waters in California, they do not qualify as waters of the state under the regulatory jurisdiction of the SWRCB because they were constructed and are maintained. No impacts to Antelope Creek are anticipated.

3.3 Special-Status Species

3.3.1 San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica, FE, ST) San Joaquin kit fox is a federally listed as endangered and state listed as threatened member of the family Canidae (USFWS 1998; CDFW 2022). San Joaquin kit fox is primarily nocturnal and typically occupies valley grassland or mixed shrub/grassland habitats in low, rolling hills and valleys (Morrell 1972). The San Joaquin kit fox will use grazed grasslands as well as grasslands with scattered structures such as power poles and wind turbines. This species also lives adjacent to, and forages in, tilled and fallow fields and irrigated row crops. However, large tracts of higher quality grassland or rangeland nearby is required to support the species (Warrick et al. 2007).

The diet of the San Joaquin kit fox varies geographically, seasonally, and annually, but throughout most of its range consists primarily of rodents, rabbits, ground-nesting birds, and insects (Scrivner et al. 1987; Spiegel et al. 1996). Giant kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ingens) is a favored prey item (Cypher et al. 2000).

The San Joaquin kit fox requires underground dens to regulate its temperature and for shelter, reproduction, and predator avoidance (Morrell 1972). It commonly modifies and uses dens constructed by other animals, such as ground squirrels and badgers, and will use human-made structures as well (USFWS 1998). Dens are usually made in loose-textured soils on slopes of less than 40 degrees, but the number of openings, entrance shape, and the slope of the ground on which they occur vary across the geographic range of the species (USFWS 1998). San Joaquin kit fox changes den locations often, typically using numerous dens each year. Koopman et al. (1998) estimated that a San Joaquin kit fox will use an average of about 12 dens over the course of a year and will often not use the same dens the following year. This species is subject to predation 170
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
27 or competitive exclusion by other species such as coyote (Canis latrans), domestic dog (Canis familiaris), bobcat (Felis rufus), and nonnative red fox (Vulpes vulpes), as well as large raptors (Benedict and Forbes 1979; Cypher and Spencer 1998; Clark et al. 2005, 2007).

There are three 1950 CNDDB records from within 5 miles of the Project site. In addition, the Project site is within a non-specific 1990 CNDDB occurrence polygon (CNDDB 2022). Although the Project site supported only agricultural and industrial land cover, it was adjacent to grassland to the east. That grassland is isolated, however, and comprises only about 70 acres. Therefore, the potential for San Joaquin kit fox to occur on or near the Project site is low.

3.3.2 Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia, SSSC)
Burrowing owl is a member of the family Strigidae recognized as a species of special concern by the CDFW (CDFW 2022). Burrowing owl depends on burrow systems excavated by other species such as California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi) and American badger (Taxidea taxus) (Poulin et al. 2020). Burrowing owl uses burrows for protection from predators, weather, as roosting sites, and dwellings to raise young (Poulin et al. 2020). It commonly perches outside burrows on mounds of soil or nearby fence posts. Prey types include insects, especially grasshoppers and crickets, small mammals, frogs, toads, and lizards (Poulin et al. 2020). The nesting season begins in March, and incubation lasts 28–30 days. The female incubates the eggs while the male forages and delivers food items to the burrow-nest; young then fledge between 44 and 53 days after hatching (Poulin et al. 2020). Adults can live up to 8 years in the wild.

Although there are no CNDDB occurrence records from within 5 miles of the Project site (CNDBB 2022), the banks of Antelope Creek east of the Project site contained ground squirrel burrows that could support this species (Figure 8). The fallowed fields on the Project site could also provide foraging habitat. However, the habitat is routinely disturbed, a row of olive trees separates the burrows from the potential foraging habitat, and the number of burrows is limited.

Therefore, the potential for this species to occur on the project site is low.

3.3.3 Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus, SSSC)
Pallid bat is a member of the family Vespertilionidae and is recognized as a Species of Special Concern by the CDFW (CDFW 2022). It is widespread in the western United States from southern British Columbia, Canada to northern Baja California, Mexico (Hermanson and O’Shea 1983). In California, pallid bat is locally common year-round at low elevations, where it occupies dry, open areas in grassland, shrubland, woodland, and forest (Zeiner et al. 1988–1990). Pallid bat is nocturnal and roosts during the day in caves, crevices in rocky outcrops, mines, and occasionally tree hollows and buildings; night roosts tend to be in more open areas including porches (Zeiner et al. 1988–1990). It forages almost exclusively on the ground, where it preys on insects, arachnids, beetles, moths, and scorpions; few prey items are taken aerially (Zeiner et al. 1988– 1990). Pallid bat hibernates during winter, usually near a day roost that it occupies in summer (Hermanson and O’Shea 1983).
171
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
28 The Project site supports potential day roost habitat in the form of industrial buildings, and open areas at the Project site may provide foraging habitat. However, there are no CNDDB records from within 5 miles of the Project site (CNDDB 2022). Therefore, the species has a low potential to occur on the Project site.

3.3.4 Western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus, SSSC) The western mastiff bat is most common in the southern half of California, but its range extends almost to the Oregon border (Cockrum 1960). This species forages in large, open areas in habitats such as desert washes, floodplains, conifer and deciduous woodlands, coastal scrub, grasslands, chaparral, and agricultural lands (Cockrum 1960; Ross 1961). Roosts include the undersides of large slabs or boulders, cliff faces, and cracks in buildings (Howell 1920; Dalquest 1946; Barbour and Davis 1969). This species prefers a roost high above the ground that allows a vertical drop of at least 10 feet to initiate flight (Howell 1920).

The Project site is within a non-specific 1990 CNDDB occurrence polygon (CDFW 2022). Roosting habitat in the form of industrial buildings were present on the Project site, and the open areas at or near the Project site may provide foraging habitat. Therefore, the species could occur on or near the Project site.
172
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
29 4.0 Environmental Impacts

4.1 Significance Determinations
This Project, which will result in temporary and permanent impacts to agricultural land cover, will not: (1) substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species (criterion a) as no such habitat is present on the Project site; (2) cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels (criterion b) as no such potentially vulnerable population is known from the area; (3) threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community (criterion c) as no such potentially vulnerable communities are known from the area; (4) substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal (criterion d) as no such potentially vulnerable species are known from the area; (5) have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS (criterion f) as no riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community was present in the survey area; (6) have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means (criterion g) as no impacts to wetlands are expected; (7) conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance (criterion i) as no trees or biologically sensitive areas will be impacted; or (8) conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Communities Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan (criterion j) as no such plan has been adopted. Thus, these significance criteria are not analyzed further.

The remaining statutorily defined criteria provided the framework for Criterion BIO1 and Criterion BIO2 below. These criteria are used to assess the impacts to biological resources stemming from the Project and provide the basis for determinations of significance:
§ Criterion BIO1: Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS (significance criterion e).
§ Criterion BIO2: Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites (significance criterion h)

4.1.1 Direct and Indirect Impacts

4.1.1.1 Potential Impact: Have a substantial Effect on any Special-Status Species (Criterion BIO1)
173
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
30 The Project could adversely affect four special-status animal species that could occur on or near the Project site. Construction activities such as excavating, trenching, or using other heavy equipment that disturbs or harms a special-status species could constitute a significant impact. We recommend that Mitigation Measures BIO1, BIO2, and BIO3 (below) be included in the conditions of approval to reduce the potential impacts to a less-than-significant level.

Mitigation Measure BIO1. Protect San Joaquin kit fox.

1. To protect San Joaquin kit fox, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey within 30 days prior to the start of ground-disturbing activities to identify potential dens (burrows larger than 4 inches in diameter) in suitable land cover types on and within 250 feet of the Project site. If potential dens for San Joaquin kit fox are present, their disturbance and destruction shall be avoided.

Exclusion zones shall be implemented based on the type of den and current use:

Mitigation Measure BIO2. Protect burrowing owl.

Mitigation Measure BIO3. Protect roosting pallid bat and western mastiff bats.

1. A pre-construction clearance survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that no roosting pallid bats will be disturbed during the implementation of the Project. A pre-construction clearance survey shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of construction activities. During this survey, the qualified biologist shall inspect all potential roosting habitat in and immediately 174
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
31 adjacent to the impact areas. If an active roost is found close enough to the construction area to be disturbed by these activities, the qualified biologist shall determine the extent of a construction-free buffer to be established around the roost. If work cannot proceed without disturbing the roosting bats, work may need to be halted or redirected to other areas until the roost is no longer in use.

4.1.1.2 Potential Impact: Interfere Substantially with Native Wildlife Movements, Corridors, or Nursery Sites (Criterion BIO2)
The Project could impede the use of nursery sites for native birds protected under the MBTA and CFGC. Migratory birds are expected to nest on and near the Project site.

Construction disturbance during the breeding season could result in the incidental loss of fertile eggs or nestlings or otherwise lead to nest abandonment. Disturbance that causes nest abandonment or loss of reproductive effort can be considered take under the MBTA and CFGC. Loss of fertile eggs or nesting birds, or any activities resulting in nest abandonment, could constitute a significant effect if the species is particularly rare in the region. Construction activities such as excavating, trenching, and grading that disturb a nesting bird on the Project site or immediately adjacent to the construction zone could constitute a significant impact. We recommend that Mitigation Measure BIO4 (below) be included in the conditions of approval to reduce the potential effect to a less-thansignificant level.

Mitigation Measure BIO4. Protect nesting birds.

1. To the extent practicable, construction shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season, which extends from February through August.

4.1.2 Cumulative Effects
The Project will involve developing an approximately 116-acre parcel that currently supports industrial buildings with graveled parking areas and fallowed agricultural fields into an industrial 175
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
32 park. The Project site could provide habitat for San Joaquin kit fox, burrowing owl, pallid bat, and western mastiff bat. Nesting habitat for migratory birds is also present on the Project site.

However, implementing Mitigation Measures BIO1 through BIO4 would reduce any contribution to cumulative impacts on biological resources to a less-than-significant level.

4.1.3 Unavoidable Significant Adverse Effects
No unavoidable significant adverse effects on biological resources would occur from implementing the Project.
176
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
33 5.0 Literature Cited
Barbour, R. W., and W. H. Davis. 1969. Bats of America. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington. 286 pp.

Benedict, E. M., and R. B. Forbes. 1979. Kit fox skulls in a southeastern Oregon cave. The Murrelet 60:25–27.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2022. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) RareFind 5. https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data. Accessed 14 January 2022.

California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program (CNPS). 2022. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-03 0.39). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. http://www.rareplants.cnps.org. Accessed 14 January 2022.

Clark, H. O., Jr., R. R. Duke, M. C. Orland, R. T. Golightly, and S. I. Hagen. 2007. The San Joaquin kit fox in north-central California: A review. Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society 43:27–36.

Clark, H. O., Jr., G. D. Warrick, B. L. Cypher, P. A. Kelly, D. F. Williams, and D. E. Grubbs. 2005.

Competitive interactions between endangered kit foxes and non-native red foxes.

Western North American Naturalist 65:153–163.

Cockrum, E. L. 1960. Distribution, habitat and habits of the mastiff bat, Eumops perotis, in North America. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Sciences 1:79–84.

Cypher, B. L., and K. A. Spencer. 1998. Competitive interactions between coyotes and San Joaquin kit foxes. Journal of Mammalogy 79:204–214.

Cypher, B. L., G. D. Warrick, M. R. Otten, T. P. O’Farrell, W. H. Berry, C. E. Harris, T. T. Kato, P. M.

McCue, J. H. Scrivner, and B. W. Zoellick. 2000. Population dynamics of San Joaquin kit foxes at the Naval Petroleum Reserves in California. Wildlife Monographs 145.

Dalquest, W. W. 1946. The daytime retreat of a California mastiff bat. Journal of Mammalogy 27:87–88.

Google. 2022. Google Earth Pro. Version 7.3.2.5776 (https://www.google.com/earth/ download/gep/agree.html). Accessed January 2022.

Hermanson, J. W. and T. J. O’Shea. 1983. Antrozous pallidus. American Society of Mammalogists. Mammalian Species 213:1–8.
177
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
34 Howell, A. B. 1920. Contributions to the life history of the California mastiff bat. Journal of Mammalogy 1:111–117.

Koopman, M. E., J. H. Scrivner, and T. T. Kato. 1998. Patterns of den use by San Joaquin kit fox.

Journal of Wildlife Management 62:373–379.

Morrell, S. H. 1972. Life history of the San Joaquin kit fox. California Fish and Game 58:162–174.

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2022. Web Soil Survey, National Cooperative Soil Survey:
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed 14 January 2022.

Poulin, R. G., L. D. Todd, E. A. Haug, B. A. Millsap, and M. S. Martell. 2020. Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (A. F. Poole, Editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.burowl.01.

Ross, A. 1961. Notes on food habits of bats. Journal of Mammalogy 42:66–71.

Scrivner, J. H., T. P. O’Farrell, and T. T. Kato. 1987. Diet of the San Joaquin kit fox, Vulpes macrotis mutica, on Naval Petroleum Reserve #1, Kern County, California, 1980–1984. U.S. Dept. of Energy Topical Report, EG&G/EM Santa Barbara Operations Report No. EGG 10282– 2168. 26 pages.

Spiegel, L. K., B. L. Cypher, and T. C. Dao. 1996. Diet of the San Joaquin kit fox at three sites in western Kern County, California. Pages 39–51 in: Studies of the San Joaquin kit fox in undeveloped and oil-developed areas, California Energy Commission, Environmental Protection Office, Sacramento, California.

United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetland Research Program Technical Report Y-87-1. ________. 2008. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:

Arid West Region (Version 2.0). ERDC/EL TR-08-28.
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1046489.pdf. Accessed January 2022.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1998. Recovery plan for upland species of the San Joaquin Valley, California. Region 1, Portland, Oregon. 319 pp. ________. 2018. Migratory Bird Permit Memorandum: Destruction and Relocation of Migratory Bird Nest Contents. FWS/DMBM/AMB/068029, 4 pages.
178
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
35 ________. 2022a. IPaC: Information for Planning and Conservation. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/.

Accessed 14 January 2022.
________. 2022b. National Wetlands Inventory website. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/. Accessed 14 January 2022.

Warrick, G. D., H. O. Clark, Jr., P. A. Kelly, D. F. Williams, and B. L. Cypher. 2007. Use of agricultural lands by kit foxes. Western North American Naturalist 67:270–277.

Zeiner, D.C., W. F. Laudenslayer, Jr., K. E. Mayer, and M. White, eds. 1988–1990. California's Wildlife. Vol. I-III. California Depart. of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California. 179
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
36 Appendix A. USFWS list of threatened and endangered species. 180
January 14, 2022
United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
Phone: (916) 414-6600 Fax: (916) 414-6713
In Reply Refer To:

Consultation Code: 08ESMF00-2022-SLI-0818
Event Code: 08ESMF00-2022-E-02519
Project Name: WOODLAKE INDUSTRIAL PARK
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:

The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the Service under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

Please follow the link below to see if your proposed project has the potential to affect other species or their habitats under the jurisdiction of the National Marine Fisheries Service:
http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/protected_species/species_list/species_lists.html New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to 181
▪
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat.

A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.

If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation plan
(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats.

Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at:
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://www.towerkill.com; and http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html.

We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office.

Attachment(s):

Official Species List
182
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action".

This species list is provided by:

Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
(916) 414-6600
183
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 08ESMF00-2022-SLI-0818
Event Code: Some(08ESMF00-2022-E-02519)
Project Name: WOODLAKE INDUSTRIAL PARK
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: Colibri Ecological proposes to assist Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. by conducting a biological resource evaluation in support of an industrial park development project (the Project) in the City of Woodlake in Tulare County, California. The Project will involve the construction of 17 buildings totaling 1,329,000 square feet and 700 parking stalls. The Project site is approximately 60 acres and currently supports industrial buildings, fallowed agricultural fields, and barren and paved parking areas. The Project site is on the southeast corner of S Blaire Road and Avenue 342 (W Ropes Avenue).

Project Location:

Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@36.40653545,-119.11299369096346,14z Counties: Tulare County, California
184

1. Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 13 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.

Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species.

IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce.

See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.

NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.

Mammals

NAME STATUS
Fisher Pekania pennanti
Population: SSN DPS
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3651
Endangered
San Joaquin Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis mutica
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2873
Endangered
Birds

NAME STATUS
California Condor Gymnogyps californianus
Population: U.S.A. only, except where listed as an experimental population There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8193
Endangered
1 185
Reptiles

NAME STATUS
Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard Gambelia silus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/625
Endangered
Giant Garter Snake Thamnophis gigas
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4482
Threatened
Amphibians

NAME STATUS
California Red-legged Frog Rana draytonii
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2891
Threatened
California Tiger Salamander Ambystoma californiense
Population: U.S.A. (Central CA DPS)
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2076
Threatened
Fishes

NAME STATUS
Delta Smelt Hypomesus transpacificus
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/321
Threatened
Insects

NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
Crustaceans

NAME STATUS
Conservancy Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta conservatio
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8246
Endangered
186
Flowering Plants

NAME STATUS
Greene's Tuctoria Tuctoria greenei
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1573
Endangered
San Joaquin Adobe Sunburst Pseudobahia peirsonii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2931
Threatened
San Joaquin Orcutt Grass Orcuttia inaequalis
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.

Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5506
Threatened
Critical habitats

THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION.
187
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
44 Appendix B. CNDDB occurrence records.
188
Elev. Element Occ. Ranks Population Status Presence
Name (Scientific/Common)
CNDDB
Ranks
Listing Status
(Fed/State) Other Lists
Range
(ft.)
Total
EO's A B C D X U
Historic
> 20 yr
Recent
<= 20 yr Extant
Poss.

Extirp. Extirp.

Agelaius tricolor
tricolored blackbird
G1G2
S1S2
None
Threatened
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_EN-Endangered
NABCI_RWL-Red
Watch List
USFWS_BCC-Birds of
Conservation Concern
505
540
955
S:2
0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 0
Ambystoma californiense pop. 1
California tiger salamander - central
California DPS
G2G3
S3
Threatened
Threatened
CDFW_WL-Watch List
IUCN_VU-Vulnerable
345
743
1263
S:9
0 6 2 0 0 1 2 7 9 0 0
Anniella pulchra
Northern California legless lizard
G3
S3
None
None
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
USFS_S-Sensitive
377
1,000
378
S:2
1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0
Antrozous pallidus
pallid bat
G4
S3
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
USFS_S-Sensitive
WBWG_H-High
Priority
368
368
420
S:1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Ardea herodias
great blue heron
G5
S4
None
None
CDF_S-Sensitive
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
500
500
156
S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Athene cunicularia
burrowing owl
G4
S3
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
USFWS_BCC-Birds of
Conservation Concern
343
343
2011
S:1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Query Criteria: Quad IS (Stokes Mtn. (3611952) OR Auckland (3611951) OR Shadequarter Mtn. (3611858) OR Ivanhoe (3611942) OR Woodlake (3611941) OR Kaweah (3611848) OR Exeter (3611932) OR Rocky Hill (3611931) OR Chickencoop Canyon (3611838)) AND Taxonomic Group IS (Fish OR Amphibians OR Reptiles OR Birds OR Mammals OR Mollusks OR Arachnids OR Crustaceans OR Insects OR Ferns OR Gymnosperms OR Monocots OR Dicots OR Lichens OR Bryophytes)
Report Printed on Friday, January 14, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated January, 1 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 1 of 5 Information Expires 7/1/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
189
Elev. Element Occ. Ranks Population Status Presence
Name (Scientific/Common)
CNDDB
Ranks
Listing Status
(Fed/State) Other Lists
Range
(ft.)
Total
EO's A B C D X U
Historic
> 20 yr
Recent
<= 20 yr Extant
Poss.

Extirp. Extirp.

Atriplex cordulata var. erecticaulis
Earlimart orache
G3T1
S1
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2 335
335
23 S:1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Atriplex minuscula
lesser saltscale
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1 335
335
52 S:1
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Atriplex persistens
vernal pool smallscale
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2 345
355
41 S:2
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0
Batrachoseps regius
Kings River slender salamander
G2
S2S3
None
None
IUCN_VU-Vulnerable
USFS_S-Sensitive
2,000
5,500
14 S:2
0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0
Bombus crotchii
Crotch bumble bee
G3G4
S1S2
None
None
450
1,000
437
S:5
0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 5 0 0
Branchinecta lynchi
vernal pool fairy shrimp
G3
S3
Threatened
None
IUCN_VU-Vulnerable 335
950
795
S:19
2 3 0 0 0 14 6 13 19 0 0
Brodiaea insignis
Kaweah brodiaea
G1
S1
None
Endangered
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
USFS_S-Sensitive
560
3,300
27 S:11
2 4 2 0 0 3 10 1 11 0 0
Chrysis tularensis
Tulare cuckoo wasp
G1G2
S1S2
None
None
450
450
5 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Delphinium recurvatum
recurved larkspur
G2?
S2?
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
340
440
119
S:4
0 0 0 0 1 3 2 2 3 0 1
Desmocerus californicus dimorphus
valley elderberry longhorn beetle
G3T2
S3
Threatened
None
405
960
271
S:2
0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0
Diplacus pictus
calico monkeyflower
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
600
600
73 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Empidonax traillii
willow flycatcher
G5
S1S2
None
Endangered
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
USFS_S-Sensitive
USFWS_BCC-Birds of
Conservation Concern
570
570
90 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Report Printed on Friday, January 14, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated January, 1 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 2 of 5 Information Expires 7/1/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
190
Elev. Element Occ. Ranks Population Status Presence
Name (Scientific/Common)
CNDDB
Ranks
Listing Status
(Fed/State) Other Lists
Range
(ft.)
Total
EO's A B C D X U
Historic
> 20 yr
Recent
<= 20 yr Extant
Poss.

Extirp. Extirp.

Emys marmorata
western pond turtle
G3G4
S3
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_VU-Vulnerable
USFS_S-Sensitive
70 1,000
1398
S:3
0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 0
Eriogonum nudum var. murinum
mouse buckwheat
G5T2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
1,280
3,400
11 S:4
0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0
Eryngium spinosepalum
spiny-sepaled button-celery
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
335
2,000
108
S:20
3 9 2 0 1 5 11 9 19 1 0
Erythranthe norrisii
Kaweah monkeyflower
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.3
BLM_S-Sensitive
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,200
2,700
8 S:2
0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0
Eumops perotis californicus
western mastiff bat
G4G5T4
S3S4
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
WBWG_H-High
Priority
450
940
296
S:5
0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 5 0 0
Euphorbia hooveri
Hoover's spurge
G1
S1
Threatened
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2 335
345
29 S:2
0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0
Fritillaria striata
striped adobe-lily
G1
S1
None
Threatened
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
SB_USDA-US Dept of
Agriculture
USFS_S-Sensitive
23 S:1
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
Glyceria grandis
American manna grass
G5
S3
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 2B.3 10
S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Gymnogyps californianus
California condor
G1
S1
Endangered
Endangered
CDF_S-Sensitive
CDFW_FP-Fully
Protected
IUCN_CR-Critically
Endangered
NABCI_RWL-Red
Watch List
1,000
1,000
13 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Report Printed on Friday, January 14, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated January, 1 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 3 of 5 Information Expires 7/1/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
191
Elev. Element Occ. Ranks Population Status Presence
Name (Scientific/Common)
CNDDB
Ranks
Listing Status
(Fed/State) Other Lists
Range
(ft.)
Total
EO's A B C D X U
Historic
> 20 yr
Recent
<= 20 yr Extant
Poss.

Extirp. Extirp.

Haliaeetus leucocephalus
bald eagle
G5
S3
Delisted
Endangered
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDF_S-Sensitive
CDFW_FP-Fully
Protected
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
USFS_S-Sensitive
USFWS_BCC-Birds of
Conservation Concern
912
912
329
S:1
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Helianthus winteri
Winter's sunflower
G2?
S2?
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
460
2,500
55 S:32
6 20 4 1 0 1 0 32 32 0 0
Lasthenia chrysantha
alkali-sink goldfields
G2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1 380
380
55 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri
Coulter's goldfields
G4T2
S2
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1
BLM_S-Sensitive
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
SB_SBBG-Santa
Barbara Botanic
Garden
350
350
111
S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Lepidurus packardi
vernal pool tadpole shrimp
G4
S3S4
Endangered
None
IUCN_EN-Endangered 340
345
329
S:2
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0
Leptosiphon serrulatus
Madera leptosiphon
G3
S3
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
USFS_S-Sensitive
1,000
3,500
27 S:2
0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0
Linderiella occidentalis
California linderiella
G2G3
S2S3
None
None
IUCN_NT-Near
Threatened
513
516
508
S:2
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0
Lithobates pipiens
northern leopard frog
G5
S2
None
None
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
19 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Lytta moesta
moestan blister beetle
G2
S2
None
None
1,000
1,000
12 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Lytta morrisoni
Morrison's blister beetle
G1G2
S1S2
None
None
960
960
10 S:1
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Report Printed on Friday, January 14, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated January, 1 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 4 of 5 Information Expires 7/1/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
192
Elev. Element Occ. Ranks Population Status Presence
Name (Scientific/Common)
CNDDB
Ranks
Listing Status
(Fed/State) Other Lists
Range
(ft.)
Total
EO's A B C D X U
Historic
> 20 yr
Recent
<= 20 yr Extant
Poss.

Extirp. Extirp.

Orcuttia inaequalis
San Joaquin Valley Orcutt grass
G1
S1
Threatened
Endangered
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1 515
515
47 S:1
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
Pseudobahia peirsonii
San Joaquin adobe sunburst
G1
S1
Threatened
Endangered
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1
SB_CalBG/RSABGCalifornia/Rancho
Santa Ana Botanic
Garden
600
1,420
51 S:3
0 0 0 1 0 2 3 0 3 0 0
Rana boylii
foothill yellow-legged frog
G3
S3
None
Endangered
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_NT-Near
Threatened
USFS_S-Sensitive
520
2,211
2476
S:10
0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 10
Sagittaria sanfordii
Sanford's arrowhead
G3
S3
None
None
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.2
BLM_S-Sensitive
400
400
126
S:1
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Spea hammondii
western spadefoot
G2G3
S3
None
None
BLM_S-Sensitive
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_NT-Near
Threatened
0 743
1422
S:31
0 26 1 0 0 4 4 27 31 0 0
Talanites moodyae
Moody's gnaphosid spider
G1G2
S1S2
None
None
400
1,200
6 S:4
0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0
Taxidea taxus
American badger
G5
S3
None
None
CDFW_SSC-Species
of Special Concern
IUCN_LC-Least
Concern
370
370
594
S:1
0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
Tuctoria greenei
Greene's tuctoria
G1
S1
Endangered
Rare
Rare Plant Rank - 1B.1 450
450
50 S:1
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
Vulpes macrotis mutica
San Joaquin kit fox
G4T2
S2
Endangered
Threatened
345
720
1020
S:7
0 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 7 0 0
Report Printed on Friday, January 14, 2022
Commercial Version -- Dated January, 1 2022 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 5 of 5 Information Expires 7/1/2022
Summary Table Report
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
193
Biological Resource Evaluation Colibri Ecological Consulting, LLC Woodlake Industrial Park Development January 2022
50 Appendix C. CNPS plant list.
194
Search Results
Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California
HOME ABOUT CHANGES REVIEW HELP Search: Simple Advanced Search for species and data Back ! Export Results
20 matches found. Click on scientific name for details
Search Criteria: CRPR is one of [1B:2B] , 9-Quad include [3611848:3611941:3611858:3611951:3611838:3611931:3611932:3611952:3611942] Search:
▲ SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME FAMILY LIFEFORM

BLOOMING
PERIOD
FED
LIST
STATE
LIST
GLOBAL
RANK
STATE
RANK

CA RARE

PLANT RANK PHOTO
Atriplex cordulata var.
erecticaulis
Earlimart orache Chenopodiaceae annual herb AugSep(Nov)None None G3T1 S1 1B.2 © 2009 Robert E.

Preston, Ph.D.

Atriplex persistens vernal pool
smallscale
Chenopodiaceae annual herb Jun-Oct None None G2 S2 1B.2 No Photo Available
Brodiaea insignis Kaweah brodiaea Themidaceae perennial bulbiferous herb
Apr-Jun None CE G1 S1 1B.2
© 2007 Robert E.

Preston, Ph.D.

Delphinium
recurvatum
recurved larkspur Ranunculaceae perennial herb Mar-Jun None None G2? S2? 1B.2 No Photo Available
Diplacus pictus calico monkeyflower Phrymaceae annual herb Mar-May None None G2 S2 1B.2 © 2020 Matt C.

Berger
Eriogonum nudum var.
murinum
mouse buckwheat Polygonaceae perennial herb Jun-Nov None None G5T2 S2 1B.2 No Photo Available
Eryngium
spinosepalum
spiny-sepaled
button-celery
Apiaceae annual/perennial herb Apr-Jun None None G2 S2 1B.2 No Photo Available
Erythranthe norrisii Kaweah
monkeyflower
Phrymaceae annual herb Mar-May None None G2 S2 1B.3
No Photo Available
Euphorbia hooveri Hoover's spurge Euphorbiaceae annual herb JulSep(Oct)FT None G1 S1 1B.2 No Photo Available
Fritillaria striata striped adobe-lily Liliaceae perennial bulbiferous herb
Feb-Apr None CT G1 S1 1B.1
© 2013 Aaron
Schusteff
Glyceria grandis American manna
grass
Poaceae perennial rhizomatous
herb
Jun-Aug None None G5 S3 2B.3
No Photo Available
Helianthus winteri Winter's sunflower Asteraceae perennial shrub Jan-Dec None None G2? S2? 1B.2 © 2014 Chris
Winchell
Lasthenia chrysantha alkali-sink goldfields Asteraceae annual herb Feb-Apr None None G2 S2 1B.1 © 2009 California
State University,
Stanislaus
Lasthenia glabrata
ssp. coulteri
Coulter's goldfields Asteraceae annual herb Feb-Jun None None G4T2 S2 1B.1 © 2013 Keir Morse
Leptosiphon
serrulatus
Madera leptosiphon Polemoniaceae annual herb Apr-May None None G3 S3 1B.2 © 2008 Chris
Winchell
Orcuttia inaequalis San Joaquin Valley
Orcutt grass
Poaceae annual herb Apr-Sep FT CE G1 S1 1B.1
No Photo Available
Pseudobahia peirsonii San Joaquin adobe
sunburst
Asteraceae annual herb Feb-Apr FT CE G1 S1 1B.1
No Photo Available
Sagittaria sanfordii Sanford's arrowhead Alismataceae perennial rhizomatous herb (emergent)
MayOct(Nov)None None G3 S3 1B.2
No Photo Available
Tuctoria greenei Greene's tuctoria Poaceae annual herb MayJul(Sep)FE CR G1 S1 1B.1 No Photo Available
Showing 1 to 20 of 20 entries
Scientific Name Common Name Family Lifeform Blooming Period Fed List State List Global Rank State Rank CA Rare Plant Rank General Habitats Micro Habitats Lowest Elevation (m) Highest Elevation (m) Lowest Elevation (ft) Highest Elevation (ft) CA Endemic Date Added Photo Suggested Citation:

California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program. 2022. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (online edition, v9-01 1.0). Website https://www.rareplants.cnps.org [accessed 14 January 2022].

ABOUT THIS WEBSITE
About the Inventory
Release Notes
Advanced Search
Glossary

ABOUT CNPS
About the Rare Plant Program
CNPS Home Page
About CNPS
Join CNPS

CONTRIBUTORS
The Calflora Database
The California Lichen Society
California Natural Diversity Database
The Jepson Flora Project
The Consortium of California Herbaria
CalPhotos
Copyright © 2010-2022 California Native Plant Society. All rights reserved. Log in Go
195
Appendix B
CHRIS Search Results
196
To: Emily Bowen Record Search 21-098
Crawford Bowen Planning, Inc.
113 N. Church Street, Suite 302
Visalia, CA 93291
Date: March 29, 2021
Re: City of Woodlake Sewer Expansion Project
County: Tulare
Map(s): Ivanhoe & Woodlake 7.5’

CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH
The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical Resources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, researchers, and the public. Recommendations made by IC coordinators or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the evaluation or opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer in carrying out the OHP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.

The following are the results of a search of the cultural resource files at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. These files include known and recorded cultural resources sites, inventory and excavation reports filed with this office, and resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the OHP Built Environment Resources Directory, California State Historical Landmarks, California Register of Historical Resources, California Inventory of Historic Resources, and California Points of Historical Interest. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the OHP are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area.

PRIOR CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS
According to the information in our files, there have been two previous cultural resource studies conducted within the project area, TU-00426 and TU-01445. There have been ten cultural resource studies conducted within a one-half mile radius, TU-00015, 00409, 00443, 01013, 01014, 01196, 01389, 01392, 01498, and 01813.
197

KNOWN/RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS There is one recorded resource within the project area, P-54-004632, an historic era railroad. There are five recorded resources within the one-half mile radius, P-54-003992, 004003, 004034, 004614, and 004875.

These resources consist of historic era storage tanks, Bravo Lake, another historic era railroad, an historic era canal, and an historic era ditch.

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
We understand this project consists of improvement and expansion of the existing sewer system in the City of Woodlake. Further, we understand the project activities will take place in the existing right-of way of several roadways. As such, no further cultural resource investigation is recommended at this time. However, if cultural resources are unearthed during project activities, wall work must halt in the area of the find and a qualified, professional consultant should be called out to assess the findings and make the appropriate mitigation recommendations. A list of qualified consultants can be found at www.chrisinfo.org.

We also recommend that you contact the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento. They will provide you with a current list of Native American individuals/organizations that can assist you with information regarding cultural resources that may not be included in the CHRIS Inventory and that may be of concern to the Native groups in the area. The Commission can consult their "Sacred Lands Inventory" file to determine what sacred resources, if any, exist within this project area and the way in which these resources might be managed. Finally, please consult with the lead agency on this project to determine if any other cultural resource investigation is required. If you need any additional information or have any questions or concerns, please contact our office at (661) 654-2289.

By:

Celeste M. Thomson, Coordinator Date: March 29, 2021
Please note that invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.
198

FINAL FOCUSED

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT
Woodlake Holdings
Industrial Park
January 2024
PREPARED BY:

Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
113 N. Church Street, Suite 310
Visalia, CA 93291
PREPARED FOR:

City of Woodlake
350 N. Valencia Avenue
Woodlake, California 93286
199
Final Focused Environmental Impact Report
Woodlake Holdings Industrial Project
Prepared for:

City of Woodlake
350 N. Valencia Avenue
Woodlake, California 93286
(559) 564-8055
Contact: Emmanuel Llamas, Community Development Director Prepared by:

Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc.
113 N. Church Street, Suite 310
Visalia, CA 93291
(559) 840-4414
Contact: Emily Bowen, LEED AP
January 2024
State Clearinghouse Number: 2022040640
200

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER ONE - Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 CEQA Requirements ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Use of the Final EIR ....................................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER TWO – Comments and Responses .............................................................................................. 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Comment Letter 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Comment Letter 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 22 CHAPTER THREE – Text Changes to the DEIR ......................................................................................... 35 CHAPTER FOUR – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ....................................................... 36 201
CHAPTER ONE - Introduction
Introduction
This Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) contains the public and agency comments received during the public review period for the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project (proposed Project), and responses to each of those comments.

This EIR is an informational document intended to disclose to the decision makers of the City of Woodlake (City) and the public the environmental consequences of approving and implementing the Woodlake Holdings Industrial Park Project or one of the alternatives to the proposed Project, which are described in the Draft EIR. All written comments received during the public review period (May 10, 2023 through June 26, 2023) of the Draft EIR are addressed in this Final EIR.

The responses in the Final EIR clarify, correct, and/or amplify text in the Draft EIR. Also included in the Final EIR are minor text changes made at the initiative of the City (the Lead Agency) and in response to comments. The Final EIR was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000-21177).

Background
Notice of Preparation
The City of Woodlake circulated an Initial Study (IS) and Notice of Preparation (NOP) (referred to collectively as “NOP”) of the EIR for the proposed Project from May 4, 2022 to June 3, 2022 to trustee and responsible agencies, the State Clearinghouse (State Clearinghouse #2022040640), and the public. Following publication of the original NOP, changes were made to the proposed Project that consisted of an increase in project acreage and a change in Land Use Designation. The IS/NOP was recirculated to the public, trustee and responsible agencies, and the State Clearinghouse from October 12, 2022 to November 14, 2022. The City received three comment letters during the NOP review period. NOP letters were received from:
• California Native American Heritage Commission – Provided regulations pertaining to AB 52 and SB 18.
• California Department of Conservation – Division of Land Resource Protection: Provided regulations pertaining to conversion of farmland to urban uses. 202
• California Department of Cannabis Control – Provided information relating to role as Responsible Agency and to cannabis regulations. Also provided comments requesting project description details and general analysis requirements, in addition to a detailed table of specific comments.

Draft EIR
The Draft EIR was properly noticed and circulated for public review and comment for 45 days, from May 10, 2023 through June 26, 2023. The Notice of Availability was published in the Sun Gazette on May 10, 2023. The Draft EIR and Appendices were sent to the State Clearinghouse for distribution and notices were mailed to local agencies and other interested individuals. The City received two comment letters on the Draft EIR within the public review period. Each letter is reproduced in its entirety in Chapter Two of this Final EIR and responses are shown after each comment.

These comments and responses that make up the Final EIR, in combination with the Draft EIR, constitute the EIR that will be considered for certification by the decision makers of the City of Woodlake.

CEQA Requirements
Under CEQA, the Lead Agency must prepare and certify a Final EIR prior to a proposed project being approved. The contents of a Final EIR are specified in Section 15132 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that a Final EIR must consist of the following:
a) The Draft EIR or a revision of the Draft EIR.
b) Comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR either verbatim or in summary.
c) A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR. d) The responses of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process.
e) Any other information added by the Lead Agency.

The Lead Agency must provide each agency that commented on the Draft EIR with a copy of the Lead Agency’s response to such comments a minimum of 10 days before certifying the Final EIR. 203
Use of the Final EIR
The Final EIR allows the public and the City an opportunity to review revisions to the Draft EIR and the responses to comments received during the Draft EIRs public review period. The Final EIR serves as the environmental document to inform the City of the environmental consequences of the proposed project, either in whole or in part, or one of the alternatives to the project discussed in the Draft EIR.

As required by Section 15090(a)(1)-(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, a Lead Agency, in certifying a Final EIR, must make the following three determinations:
1) The Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA. 2) The Final EIR was presented to the decision-making body of the Lead Agency, and the decision-making body reviewed and considered the information in the Final EIR prior to approving the project.
3) The Final EIR reflects the Lead Agency’s independent judgement and analysis.

As required by Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines, a public agency cannot approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified that identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings (Findings of Fact) for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale to reach findings supported by substantial evidence in the record. The possible findings are as follows:
1) Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. 2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. 3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR.

Additionally, pursuant to Section 15093(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, when a Lead Agency approves a project that would result in significant unavoidable impacts that are disclosed in the Final EIR, the agency must state in writing the reasons supporting the approval. The Statement of Overriding Considerations must be supported by substantial evidence in the Lead Agency’s administrative record.
204
If the City approves the Project, and as part of that action adopts mitigation measures, the City will also adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (see Public Resources Code Section 21081.6).
205
CHAPTER TWO – Comments and Responses
Introduction
This chapter of the Final EIR contains a copy of each of the written comments received from the public and other agencies with jurisdiction over the proposed Project, followed by responses to each comment. Two comment letters were received during the public review period from the following agencies:

Comment Letter 1:

Julie A. Vance, Regional Manager
Jackson Powell, Environmental Scientist
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Central Region 1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, CA 93710
June 13, 2023
Comment Letter 2:

Lindsay Rains, Licensing Program Manager
Kevin Ponce, Senior Environmental Scientist Supervisor
CalCannabis Cultivation Licensing Division
1220 N Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
June 22, 2023
206
Comment Letter 1
Julie A. Vance, Regional Manager
Jackson Powell, Environmental Scientist
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Central Region 1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, CA 93710
June 13, 2023
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
Response to Comment Letter 1:
• Response to potential impacts to resources including special status species:

Pages 25-27 of the Initial Study (Appendix A of the draft EIR) include mitigation measures to address potential impacts to sensitive biological species resulting from the grounddisturbing development activities and ongoing facilities operations. Implementation of mitigation measures BIO-1 through BIO-4 reduce potential impacts to San Joaquin Kit Fox, Burrowing Owl, Pallid Bats and Western Mastiff Bats, and Nesting Birds. A site reconnaissance survey was conducted on January 13, 2022 and the written report is included in Appendix A of the NOP (Appendix A of the draft EIR). The City has determined that no further analysis is necessary.
• Response to Lake and Streambed Alteration Program:

Page 27 ends

Woodlake City CouncilMarch 11, 2024

Woodlake City Council
March 11, 2024