Woodland City Council
December 17, 2024

City of Woodland

Meeting Agenda

City Council
City Hall
Council Chambers
300 First Street
Woodland, CA 95695
December 17, 2024
6:00 PM

JOINT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL/WOODLAND FINANCE AUTHORITY MEETING 6:00 PM

A. CALL TO ORDER

B. ROLL CALL

C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Land Acknowledgement Statement - The City of Woodland acknowledges the land on which we live and work.

For thousands of years, this land has been the home of Patwin people. Today, there are three federally recognized Patwin tribes: Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community, Kletsel Dehe Wintun Nation, and Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation. The Patwin people have remained committed to the stewardship of this land over many centuries. It has been cherished and protected, as elders have instructed the young through generations. We are honored and grateful to be here today on their traditional lands.

D. COMMUNICATIONS - PUBLIC COMMENT

This is an opportunity for the public to speak to the Council on any item other than those listed on this agenda.

Speakers are requested to use the microphone in front of the Council and to begin by stating their name, whether they reside in Woodland and the name of the organization they represent if any. The Mayor may impose a time limit on any speaker depending on the number of people wanting to speak and time available for the rest of the agenda. In the event comments are related to an item scheduled on the agenda, speakers may be required to wait to make their comments until that item is considered. The option to submit a public comment via voicemail is no longer available. Written Public Comments Members of the public are welcome to submit written comments prior to the meeting. Comments should be submitted by email to [email protected]. Written Comments received at least two (2) hours prior to the scheduled start time of the City Council meeting will be provided to the City Council and posted to the City website as part of the official record of the meeting but will not be read into the record. Written Comments received within two (2) hours of the scheduled start time of the City Council meeting and during the City Council meeting will be provided to the City Council the day following the City Council meeting. If you are submitting written comments on a particular item on the agenda, please identify the agenda item number and letter. If you are submitting written comments on an item not listed on the agenda, please identify your e-mail/comment as a General Public Comment. Note: Public comments at special meetings are limited to items on the agenda only.

1. SUBJECT: General Public Comments

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: This section is reserved for "General" Public Comments emailed within two (2) hours prior to the Council Meeting. These comments will be provided to the City Council and incorporated into the meeting minutes. Any other written communications submitted for items specific to this agenda will be attached as a file to the associated agenda item.

E. COMMUNICATIONS - COUNCIL/STAFF STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS

This is an opportunity for the Council Members and Staff to make comments and announcements, to express concerns, or to request Council's consideration of any items a Council Member would like to have discussed at a future Council meeting.

2. SUBJECT: Long Range Calendar

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the Long Range Calendar for informational purposes only.

F. CONSENT CALENDAR

3. SUBJECT: Commission on Aging Meeting Minutes for October 17, 2024

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the October 17, 2024 Commission on Aging meeting minutes.

4. SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes for October 2024

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends the City Council receive the October 28, 2024, Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes.

5. SUBJECT: Sustainability Advisory Committee September 2024 Minutes

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive minutes from the Sustainability Advisory Committee September 2024 meeting.

6. SUBJECT: 2023 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Award Acceptance and Appropriation

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, authorizing the City Manager and the Fire Department to 1) Accept the 2023 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Award for cardiovascular and cancer screenings for all personnel; and 2) Appropriate $39,260.00 to the Other Federal Grant Fund 330 to fund the initial expenditure.

7. SUBJECT: City of Woodland Prohousing Incentive Program Application

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No.____, authorizing an application for, and receipt of, Prohousing Incentive Program funds.

8. SUBJECT: Waiver of Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. ____, Amending Section 15.16.200 of the Woodland Municipal Code

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that City Council waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. _____, to amend Section

15.16.200 of Chapter 15.16 of the Woodland Municipal Code to provide additional alternative means of compliance with the City’s affordable housing requirements.

9. SUBJECT: Approve the Plans, Specifications and Bid Authorization for Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Project, CIP 22-15

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving the project plans and specifications and

authorizing the bid advertisement for the Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Project, CIP 22-15.

10. SUBJECT: Approve the Plans, Specifications and Bid Authorization for Community Center Parking Lot Expansion, CIP 24-08

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No ____, 1) Approving the project plans and specifications and authorizing the bid advertisement of the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, CIP 24-08; and 2) Approving a consultant services amendment for design services with Laugenour and Meikle in the amount of $17,875 for a total agreement amount of $173,216 and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment for the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, CIP 24-08.

11. SUBJECT: Approve the Plans, Specifications and Bid Authorization for 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving the project plans and specifications for the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02 and authorizing the bid advertisement.

12. SUBJECT: Approve a Construction Contract for the Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project, CIP 19-13

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____ to 1) Appropriate $400,000 in SLIF Roads Funds (Fund 682) to the Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project (CIP 19-13) to cover all project costs; 2) Approve a construction contract for the Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project (CIP 19-13) and award the construction contract in the amount of $1,671,099 to Carone & Company; authorize a contract contingency up to 15% ($250,665); and authorize the City Manager to execute the construction contract and change orders; 3) Approve a professional services agreement for inspection services with UNICO Engineering in the amount of $224,146.79, authorize a contract contingency up to 15% ($33,622), and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and amendments; and 4) Approve an engineering design consultant services contract amendment with Mark Thomas in the amount of $12,800 for a total agreement amount of $404,957.29 and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.

13. SUBJECT: Approve a Professional Services Contract for the East Main Pump Station Generator Rehabilitation Project, CIP #22-02

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving a professional services contract with West Yost for pre-design services in the amount of $118,006.

14. SUBJECT: Approve a Professional Services Agreement with BSK Associates for 2025 Water Quality Testing Services

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, authorizing the City Manager to execute the contract with BSK Associates for the 2025 Water Quality Testing Services, for

an amount up to $148,861.50 and authorize a contingency of up to 10% ($14,886.15).

15. SUBJECT: Final Acceptance and Notice of Completion for the Spring Lake Recycled Water Project, CIP 17-07

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, accepting the construction contract for the Spring Lake Recycled Water Project, CIP 17-07, with Argonaut Constructors, Inc., as complete and authorizing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.

16. SUBJECT: Accept the Public Improvements for Subdivision Final Map 5162 and 5206 Pioneer Village Phase 1 and 2 Offsites

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, accepting the Public Improvements For Subdivision Final Map 5162 and 5206, Pioneer Village Phase 1 and 2 (offsite improvements only).

17. SUBJECT: Final Map 5221 Ruby Estates Subdivision, Related Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Related Spring Lake Infrastructure Fee (SLIF) Reimbursement Agreement

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council 1) Adopt Resolution No. _____, approving Final Map 5221 Ruby Estates Subdivision, approving the related Subdivision Improvement Agreement and authorizing the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City, and authorizing the City Manager to approve amendments to the Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the extension of time; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. _____, approving the SLIF Reimbursement Agreement for infrastructure related to Final Subdivision Map No. 5221 Ruby Estates Subdivision, and authorizing the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City, and authorizing the City Manager to sign amendments up to 15% of the Reimbursement Agreement.

G. PUBLIC HEARINGS

18. SUBJECT: Mobile Vendor Ordinance Updates

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the staff report, conduct a public hearing, and take the following actions: 1) Introduce and waive the first reading of an Ordinance adopting Chapter 5.40 "Sidewalk Vendors" into the Woodland Municipal Code; 2) Introduce and waive the first reading of an Ordinance repealing Chapter 10.20 of the Woodland Municipal Code and adopting Chapter 5.44 "Mobile Vendors"; 3) Introduce and waive the first reading of an Ordinance repealing and replacing Section 17.84.250 "Mobile Vendors" of Woodland Municipal Code, Title 17 Zoning Ordinance with Section 17.84.250 "Mobile Vending and Food Preparation"; 4) Introduce and waive the first reading of an Ordinance adopting Chapter 8.32 into the Woodland Municipal Code; and 5) Adopt a Resolution approving new mobile vendor permit fees and annual renewal fees.

H. REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER

19. SUBJECT: Waste Management Update & Annual Rate Adjustment

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. _____, to 1) Receive a Waste Management update and the 2025 rate adjustment information; 2) Accept it as complete and adequate; and 3) Deem the proposed 2025 rate adjustments approved.

20. SUBJECT: Annual Measure R Report for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2024

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Annual Report for Measure R for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2024, and direct staff to publish the required excerpt of the report in the Daily Democrat and on the City's website.

21. SUBJECT: Measure F Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2024

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Measure F Annual Report for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2024, and direct staff to publish the required excerpts from the report in the Daily Democrat and on the City's website.

22. SUBJECT: Revision to Council Committee Assignments

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the Council amend the attached City Council Assignments for 2025.

23. SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Schedule for 2025

RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve its meeting schedule for 2025.

I. ADJOURN

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Agenda for the Joint Regular City Council/Woodland Finance Authority of the City of Woodland scheduled for December 17, 2024 was posted on December 13, 2024 in the outside display case at City Hall, 300 First Street, Woodland, CA, and was available to the public during normal business hours.

Upon request, agendas and documents in the agenda packet will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by law. Any such requests must be made in writing to the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Woodland.

Requests will be valid for the calendar year in which the request is received, and must be renewed prior to January 1st.

Persons needing disability-related modifications or accommodations in order to participate in public meetings, including persons requiring auxiliary aids or services, may request such modifications or accommodations by calling the Office of the City Clerk (530-661-5806) at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: D.1
SUBJECT: General Public Comments

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: This section is reserved for "General" Public Comments emailed within two (2) hours prior to the Council Meeting. These comments will be provided to the City Council and incorporated into the meeting minutes. Any other written communications submitted for items specific to this agenda will be attached as a file to the associated agenda item.

Attachments:

None

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: E.2
SUBJECT: Long Range Calendar

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the Long Range Calendar for informational purposes only.

Staff Contact:

Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk, (530) 661-5806, [email protected]

Background:

This calendar is being provided for planning purposes only and is intended to keep the Council apprised of upcoming agenda items and plan for upcoming Council items.

Attachments:

1. Council Long Range Calendar

CITY COUNCIL LONG RANGE CALENDAR
January 7th REGULAR MEETING (TENTATIVE)
(This meeting proposed to be cancelled pending approval of 2025 City Council Calendar) January 21st REGULAR MEETING
Planning Division Permitting and Entitlement Fee Schedule Truck Route Map Modifications – Public Hearing
Yolo County Housing Authority Strategic Plan
Yolano Donnelly Redevelopment – YCH Funding Agreement
Recognize Winners of MLK Jr. Essay and Visual Arts Contest Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Amendments
February 4th REGULAR MEETING
SACOG 2025 Blueprint Project Presentation
Equity Action Plan Update
Public Works Semi-Annual Report
Police Department Semi-Annual Report
Fire Department Semi-Annual Report
Future Topics / Study Sessions:

Downtown Transit Hub Presentation
Woodland Tennis Club Agreement (TBD)
Council Boundaries Update per Annexations (TBD
Campaign Contribution Ordinance Update (TBD)
Council Handbook – Policies & Procedures (TBD)
Updated 12/13/2024

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.3
SUBJECT: Commission on Aging Meeting Minutes for October 17, 2024

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the October 17, 2024 Commission on Aging meeting minutes.

Staff Contact:

Dallas Tringali, Community Services Program Manager, (530) 661-2005, [email protected]

Discussion:

At the last Commission on Aging meeting on November 21, 2024, the minutes from the October 17, 2024 meeting were approved.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive the October 17, 2024 Commission on Aging meeting minutes.

Prepared by: Dallas Tringali, Community Services Program Manager

Reviewed by: Christine Engel, Community Services Director

Attachments:

1. 2024 10 17 COA Minutes

City of Woodland

City of Woodland
Woodland Community & Senior Center
2001 East Street
Woodland, CA 95776

Commission on Aging –

Thursday, October 17, 2024

4:00 PM

City of Woodland

A. CALL TO ORDER
Meeting called to order at 04:00 PM

B. ROLL CALL

Commissioners Present: Bliss-Moreau, Campbell, Harryman, Overholt, Rubin

Absent: None
Excused: None

C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

D. REGULAR CALENDAR

1. Approve Minutes from the September 19, 2024 Commission on Aging Meeting

On a motion by Commissioner Rubin, seconded by Commissioner Overholt, Commissioners Approve Minutes from the September 19, 2024 Commission on Aging Meeting

Ayes: Bliss-Moreau, Campbell, Harryman, Overholt, Rubin

Noes: None

Absent:

2. Commissioner Request for Absence from Future Meetings

On a motion by Commissioner Kathy Harryman, seconded by Commissioner Dan Rubin and carried unanimously on a roll call vote, Commissioners approved Commissioner Regan Overholt's request for absence on November 21, 2024.

Ayes: Commissioner Regan Overholt, Chairperson Don Campbell, Commissioner Eliza Bliss-Moreau, Commissioner Kathy Harryman, Commissioner Dan Rubin

Noes: None

Absent:

E. COMMUNICATIONS - COMMISSION/STAFF STATEMENTS AND REQUESTS

3. Commissioner Reports and Updates
Verbal updates provided by Commissioners.

F. NEW BUSINESS

4. Apartment Listing Update for 2025/2026
Commissioners divided up the Apartment guide for updating. Information to be provided to Staff in February 2025.

5. Senior Center Speaker Series
Commissioner Eliza Bliss-Moreau provided verbal updates for the Speaker Series.

G. REPORT OF THE STAFF

City of Woodland

6. Senior Center Staff Report
Verbal updates provided by Staff.

H. COMMUNICATIONS - PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment.

I. AGENDA ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
Staff to invite speaker from HICAP to attend November's Commission meeting.

J. ADJOURN
On a motion by Commissioner Regan Overholt, seconded by Commissioner Dan Rubin, Meeting adjourned at 04:56 PM.

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.4
SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes for October 2024

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends the City Council receive the October 28, 2024, Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes.

Staff Contact:

Kris Bain, Community Services Program Manager, (530) 661-2002, [email protected]

Discussion:

The minutes from the October 28, 2024, Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting were approved at the last meeting on November 25, 2024.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends the City Council receive the October 28, 2024, Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes.

Prepared by: Kris Bain, Community Services Program Manager

Reviewed by: Christine Engel, Community Services Director

Attachments:

1. Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes October 28, 2024

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.5
SUBJECT: Sustainability Advisory Committee September 2024 Meeting Minutes

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive minutes from the Sustainability Advisory Committee September 2024 meeting.

Staff Contact:

Spencer Bowen, Communication & Strategic Policies Manager | [email protected], (530) 661-5808

Discussion:

The Sustainability Advisory Committee's September meeting minutes are attached to this agenda item. Meeting highlights included:
• Debrief on a successful "Green Drinks" event
• Planning for the September "California Coastal Cleanup Event" • Approval of an updated Committee Work Plan (included in a previous Council agenda)

These September minutes are appearing on the December 17 City Council agenda because draft minutes must be approved by the Sustainability Advisory Committee at their subsequent meeting, and the Committee did not achieve a quorum in October. These minutes were approved on Wednesday, November 20.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive minutes from the Sustainability Advisory Committee September 2024 meeting.

Attachments:

1. SAC Meeting Minutes 9.18.24

Sustainability Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
September 18, 2024 – 6:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER
Meeting called to order at 6:09 PM.

B. ROLL CALL

Present: Whitaker, Frankenbach, Perrin, Muñoz, Serena

Absent: Aulman, Bellows, Green, Cazares
C. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is an opportunity for the public to comment on items not on the agenda. Comments may be presented in person or emailed to [email protected] and limited to three (3) minutes when read aloud.

No public comment.

D. MEMBER REPORTS
This is an opportunity for members of the Committee to report on relevant activities or topics related to the Committee’s charge.

Adelita: Recaps successful Green Drinks event, new members attended and two City Council members, Tom Stallard and Vicky Fernandez, staff from the venue (The HIVE) expressed interest in future partnerships for the Green Drinks events.

Frankenbach: Finished canopy survey with Mark, goal of the project is to identify areas in Woodland to plant trees to increase tree canopy to 25%, went to randomly sampled lots to assess if there is sufficient room to plant a tree (88% of lots had some room for trees), will do a write up on it after spending more time looking through the data.

E. STAFF REPORTS
RECCOMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the SAC receive updates from City staff on ongoing initiatives and projects

Staff member Spencer Bowen presented on several topics, including ongoing regional grant programs and the City Manager’s Office’s Civic Fellow progress.

F. MINUTES
RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the SAC approve its August meeting minutes
Whitaker moves, Perrin seconds
4-0-1 vote (Frankenbach abstains)
G. BUSINESS ITEMS
RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the SAC review and adopt its 2024-25 Work Plan
Committee reviewed its updated Work Plan, which included suggestions and notes made at the August meeting. Work Plan to be passed along to City Council at their next regular meeting.

Whitaker moves to accept, Serena seconds. Motion passes 5-0.

H. WORK GROUP UPDATES
Outreach and Engagement Work Group: Coastal Cleanup Day on Saturday I. LONG RANGE CALENDAR
RECOMMENDATION FOR ACTION: Staff recommends that the SAC receive the Long-Range Calendar for informational purposes only
J. ADJOURN
Meeting adjourned at 6:53 PM.

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.6
SUBJECT: 2023 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Award Acceptance and Appropriation

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, authorizing the City Manager and the Fire Department to 1) Accept the 2023 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Award for cardiovascular and cancer screenings for all personnel; and 2) Appropriate $39,260.00 to the Other Federal Grant Fund 330 to fund the initial expenditure.

Staff Contact:

Eric Zane, Fire Chief - (530)661-5861, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The AFG award reimburses 90% of costs, requiring a 10% recipient match. The Woodland Fire Department requested funding for early detection cardiovascular and cancer screenings for all personnel totaling $39,260. The required $3,570 in matching funds were allocated as one-time funding from Measure F during the FY2024/25 budget development process. Matching funds will be transferred to Fund 330.

Background:

The primary goal of the Assistance to Firefighters Grants (AFG) is to enhance the safety of the public and firefighters with respect to fire-related hazards by providing direct financial assistance to eligible fire departments, nonaffiliated Emergency Medical Services organizations, and State Fire Training Academies. This funding is for critically needed resources to equip and train emergency personnel to recognized standards, enhance operations efficiencies, foster interoperability, and support community resilience.

In February 2024, the Woodland Fire Department submitted an AFG Micro-grant application for cardiovascular and cancer screenings to fund early detection screenings for all personnel totaling $39,260. The Fire Department also requested a one-time funding appropriation from Measure F for the matching funds, which was approved by Council as part of the FY2024/25 budget process.

Discussion:

Cardiovascular disease accounts for roughly 40-50% of annual duty related fatalities in the fire service and according to NIOSH firefighters face a 9% increase in cancer diagnoses and a 14% increase in cancer-related deaths, compared to the general population. Fire Departments across the United States are recognizing the need for early detection amongst their members, Woodland is no exception. Comprehensive screenings can be completed at the station to minimize impact of emergency services.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, authorizing the City Manager and the Fire Department to 1) Accept the 2023 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Award for cardiovascular and cancer screenings for all personnel; and 2) Appropriate $39,260.00 to the Other Federal Grant Fund 330 to fund the initial expenditure.

Prepared by: Erik Komula, Battalion Chief
Approved by: Eric Zane, Fire Chief

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - 2023 AFG Micro

2. EMW-2023-FG-03821 - Award Package

RESOLUTION NO.______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2023 ASSISTNACE TO FIREFIGHERS GRANT (AFG) AWARD AND APPROPTION OF $39,260 TO FUND 330 WHEREAS, the Woodland Fire Department successfully applied for and was awarded the 2023 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) for early detection cardiovascular and cancer screenings; and
WHEREAS, Cardiovascular disease accounts for roughly 40-50% of annual duty related fatalities in the fire service and according to NIOSH firefighters face a 9% increase in cancer diagnoses and a 14% increase in cancer-related deaths, compared to the general population.; and WHEREAS, the AFG will reimburse 90% of the cost of the screenings with a 10% City match; and
WHEREAS, the Fire Department requested a one-time General Fund appropriation for the matching funds which was approved by Council as part of the FY24/25 budget process.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland:

SECTION 1. Accept the 2023 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Award for cardiovascular and cancer screenings for all personnel.

SECTION 2.Appropriate $39,260 to Fund 330 to fund the initial expenditure that includes a transfer of $3,570 from Measure F for the required matching funds.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland this 17th day of December 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT
ABSTAIN:

Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

Award Letter
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20472
Effective date: 07/08/2024
Jeran Scruggs

WOODLAND FIRE DEPARTMENT
1000 LINCOLN AVE
WOODLAND, CA 95695
EMW-2023-FG-03821
Dear Jeran Scruggs,
Congratulations on behalf of the Department of Homeland Security. Your application submitted for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (FG) Grant funding opportunity has been approved in the amount of $35,690.90 in Federal funding. As a condition of this grant, you are required to contribute non-Federal funds equal to or greater than 10.0% of the Federal funds awarded, or $3,569.10 for a total approved budget of $39,260.00. Please see the FY 2023 FG Notice of Funding Opportunity for information on how to meet this cost share requirement.

Before you request and receive any of the Federal funds awarded to you, you must establish acceptance of the award through the FEMA Grants Outcomes (FEMA GO) system. By accepting this award, you acknowledge that the terms of the following documents are incorporated into the terms of your award:

Summary Award Memo - included in this document
Agreement Articles - included in this document
Obligating Document - included in this document
2023 FG Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) - incorporated by reference Please make sure you read, understand, and maintain a copy of these documents in your official file for this award.

Sincerely,

PAMELA WILLIAMS
Assistant Administrator, Grant Programs

Summary Award Memo
Program: Fiscal Year 2023 Assistance to Firefighters Grant Recipient: WOODLAND FIRE DEPARTMENT
UEI-EFT: YAXJHVRK3M68
DUNS number: 785302373
Award number: EMW-2023-FG-03821
Summary description of award
The purpose of the Assistance to Firefighters Grant program is to protect the health and safety of the public and firefighting personnel against fire and fire-related hazards. After careful consideration, FEMA has determined that the recipient's project or projects submitted as part of the recipient's application and detailed in the project narrative as well as the request details section of the application - including budget information - was consistent with the Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program's purpose and was worthy of award.

Except as otherwise approved as noted in this award, the information you provided in your application for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Assistance to Firefighters Grant funding is incorporated into the terms and conditions of this award. This includes any documents submitted as part of the application.

Amount awarded table
The amount of the award is detailed in the attached Obligating Document for Award.

The following are the budgeted estimates for object classes for this award (including Federal share plus your cost share, if applicable):

Approved scope of work
After review of your application, FEMA has approved the below scope of work. Justifications are provided for any differences between the scope of work in the original application and the approved scope of work under this award. You must submit scope or budget revision requests for FEMA's prior approval, via an amendment request, as appropriate per 2 C.F.R. § 200.308 and the FY2023 FG NOFO.

Approved request details:

Wellness and fitness programs
Object Class Total
Personnel $0.00
Fringe benefits $0.00
Travel $0.00
Equipment $0.00
Supplies $0.00
Contractual $39,260.00
Construction $0.00
Other $0.00
Indirect charges $0.00
Federal $35,690.90
Non-federal $3,569.10
Total $39,260.00
Program Income $0.00

Cancer Screening Physical

DESCRIPTION
Cancer screening physicals for all 52 members of the Woodland Fire Department. 43- Firefighters, 3 Battalion Chiefs, 1, Fire Chief, 3 Prevention Staff and 2 Admin Staff.

QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
52 $755.00 $39,260.00

BUDGET CLASS
Contractual

Agreement Articles
Program: Fiscal Year 2023 Assistance to Firefighters Grant Recipient: WOODLAND FIRE DEPARTMENT
UEI-EFT: YAXJHVRK3M68
DUNS number: 785302373
Award number: EMW-2023-FG-03821
Table of contents

Article
1 Assurances, Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, Representations, and Certifications
Article
2 General Acknowledgements and Assurances
Article
3 Acknowledgement of Federal Funding from DHS
Article
4 Activities Conducted Abroad
Article
5 Age Discrimination Act of 1975
Article
6 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Article
7 Best Practices for Collection and Use of Personally Identifiable Information Article
8 Civil Rights Act of 1964 – Title VI
Article
9 Civil Rights Act of 1968
Article
10 Copyright
Article
11 Debarment and Suspension
Article
12 Drug-Free Workplace Regulations
Article
13 Duplicative Costs
Article
14 Education Amendments of 1972 (Equal Opportunity in Education Act) – Title IX Article
15 E.O. 14074 – Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety
Article
16 Energy Policy and Conservation Act
Article
17 False Claims Act and Program Fraud Civil Remedies
Article
18 Federal Debt Status
Article
19 Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging while Driving Article
20 Fly America Act of 1974
Article
21 Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990
Article
22 John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2019 Article
23 Limited English Proficiency (Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI) Article
24 Lobbying Prohibitions
Article
25 National Environmental Policy Act

Article
26 Nondiscrimination in Matters Pertaining to Faith-Based Organizations Article
27 Non-Supplanting Requirement
Article
28 Notice of Funding Opportunity Requirements
Article
29 Patents and Intellectual Property Rights
Article
30 Procurement of Recovered Materials
Article
31 Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Article
32 Reporting of Matters Related to Recipient Integrity and Performance Article
33 Reporting Subawards and Executive Compensation
Article
34 Required Use of American Iron, Steel, Manufactured Products, and Construction Materials
Article
35 SAFECOM
Article
36 Terrorist Financing
Article
37 Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA)
Article
38 Universal Identifier and System of Award Management
Article
39 USA PATRIOT Act of 2001
Article
40 Use of DHS Seal, Logo and Flags
Article
41 Whistleblower Protection Act
Article
42 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Review Article
43 Applicability of DHS Standard Terms and Conditions to Tribes Article
44 Acceptance of Post Award Changes
Article
45 Disposition of Equipment Acquired Under the Federal Award Article
46 Prior Approval for Modification of Approved Budget
Article
47 Indirect Cost Rate
Article
48 Award Performance Goals

Article 1 Assurances, Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, Representations, and Certifications
I. Recipients must complete either the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Standard Form 424B Assurances – Non- Construction Programs, or OMB Standard Form 424D Assurances – Construction Programs, as applicable. Certain assurances in these documents may not be applicable to your program and the DHS financial assistance office (DHS FAO) may require applicants to certify additional assurances. Applicants are required to fill out the assurances as instructed by the federal awarding agency.

Article 2 General Acknowledgements and Assurances
Recipients are required to follow the applicable provisions of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in effect as of the federal award date and located at 2 C.F.R.

Part 200 and adopted by DHS at 2 C.F.R. § 3002.10. All recipients and subrecipients must acknowledge and agree to provide DHS access to records, accounts, documents, information, facilities, and staff pursuant to 2 C.F.R. § 200.337. I. Recipients must cooperate with any DHS compliance reviews or compliance investigations. II. Recipients must give DHS access to examine and copy records, accounts, and other documents and sources of information related to the federal financial assistance award and permit access to facilities and personnel. III. Recipients must submit timely, complete, and accurate reports to the appropriate DHS officials and maintain appropriate backup documentation to support the reports. IV. Recipients must comply with all other special reporting, data collection, and evaluation requirements required by law, federal regulation, Notice of Funding Opportunity, federal award specific terms and conditions, and/or federal awarding agency program guidance. V. Recipients must complete the DHS Civil Rights Evaluation Tool within thirty (30) days of receiving the Notice of Award for the first award under which this term applies. Recipients of multiple federal awards from DHS should only submit one completed tool for their organization, not per federal award. After the initial submission, recipients are required to complete the tool once every two (2) years if they have an active federal award, not every time a federal award is made. Recipients must submit the completed tool, including supporting materials, to [email protected]. This tool clarifies the civil rights obligations and related reporting requirements contained in these DHS Standard Terms and Conditions. Subrecipients are not required to complete and submit this tool to DHS. The evaluation tool can be found at https://www.dhs.gov/publication/dhs- civil-rights-evaluation-tool. DHS Civil Rights Evaluation Tool | Homeland Security. The DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties will consider, in its discretion, granting an extension to the 30-day deadline if the recipient identifies steps and a timeline for completing the tool. Recipients must request extensions by emailing the request to [email protected] prior to expiration of the 30-day deadline.

Article 3 Acknowledgement of Federal Funding from DHS
Recipients must acknowledge their use of federal award funding when issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposal, bid invitations, and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with federal award funds.

Article 4 Activities Conducted Abroad
Recipients must coordinate with appropriate government authorities when performing project activities outside the United States obtain all appropriate licenses, permits, or approvals.

Article 5 Age Discrimination Act of 1975
Recipients must comply with the requirements of the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94-135 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.

Article 6 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Recipients must comply with the requirements of Titles I, II, and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Pub. L. No. 101-336 (1990) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101– 12213), which prohibits recipients from discriminating on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities.

Article 7 Best Practices for Collection and Use of Personally Identifiable Information
Recipients who collect personally identifiable information (PII) as part of carrying out the scope of work under a federal award are required to have a publicly available privacy policy that describes standards on the usage and maintenance of the PII they collect. DHS defines PII as any information that permits the identity of an individual to be directly or indirectly inferred, including any information that is linked or linkable to that individual.

Recipients may also find the DHS Privacy Impact Assessments: Privacy Guidance and Privacy Template as useful resources respectively.

Article 8 Civil Rights Act of 1964 – Title VI
Recipients must comply with the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. No. 88-352 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), which provides that no person in the United States will, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. DHS implementing regulations for the Act are found at 6 C.F.R. Part 21. Recipients of an award from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) must also comply with FEMA’s implementing regulations at 44 C.F.R. Part 7.

Article 9 Civil Rights Act of 1968
Recipients must comply with Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Pub. L.

No. 90-284 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.) which prohibits recipients from discriminating in the sale, rental, financing, and advertising of dwellings, or in the provision of services in connection. therewith, on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, familial status, and sex, as implemented by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development at 24 C.F.R. Part 100. The prohibition on disability discrimination includes the requirement that new multifamily housing with four or more dwelling units— i.e., the public and common use areas and individual apartment units (all units in buildings with elevators and ground-floor units in buildings without elevators)—be designed and constructed with certain accessible features. (See 24 C.F.R. Part 100, Subpart D.) Article 10 Copyright
Recipients must affix the applicable copyright notices of 17 U.S.C. §§ 401 or 402 to any work first produced under federal awards and also include an acknowledgement that the work was produced under a federal award (including the federal award number and federal awarding agency). As detailed in 2 C.F.R. § 200.315, a federal awarding agency reserves a royalty- free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use the work for federal purposes and to authorize others to do so.

Article 11 Debarment and Suspension
Recipients must comply with the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders (E.O.) 12549 and 12689 set forth at 2 C.F.R. Part 180 as implemented by DHS at 2 C.F.R. Part 3000. These regulations prohibit recipients from entering into covered transactions (such as subawards and contracts) with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities.

Article 12 Drug-Free Workplace Regulations
Recipients must comply with drug-free workplace requirements in Subpart B (or Subpart C, if the recipient is an individual) of 2 C.F.R. Part 3001, which adopts the Government- wide implementation (2 C.F.R. Part 182) of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. §§ 8101-8106).

Article 13 Duplicative Costs
Recipients are prohibited from charging any cost to this federal award that will be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federal award in either the current or a prior budget period. (See 2 C.F.R. § 200.403(f)). However, recipients may shift costs that are allowable under two or more federal awards where otherwise permitted by federal statutes, regulations, or the federal financial assistance award terms and conditions.

Article 14 Education Amendments of 1972 (Equal Opportunity in Education Act) – Title IX
Recipients must comply with the requirements of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Pub. L. No. 92-318 (codified as amended at 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.), which provide that no person in the United States will, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. DHS implementing regulations are codified at 6 C.F.R. Part 17. Recipients of an award from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) must also comply with FEMA’s implementing regulations at 44 C.F.R. Part 19.

Article 15 E.O. 14074 – Advancing Effective, Accountable Policing and Criminal Justice Practices to Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety Recipient State, Tribal, local, or territorial law enforcement agencies must comply with the requirements of section 12(c) of E.O. 14074. Recipient State, Tribal, local, or territorial law enforcement agencies are also encouraged to adopt and enforce policies consistent with E.O. 14074 to support safe and effective policing.

Article 16 Energy Policy and Conservation Act
Recipients must comply with the requirements of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Pub. L. No. 94-163 (1975) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 6201 et seq.), which contain policies relating to energy efficiency that are defined in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with this Act.

Article 17 False Claims Act and Program Fraud Civil Remedies Recipients must comply with the requirements of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729- 3733, which prohibit the submission of false or fraudulent claims for payment to the Federal Government. (See 31 U.S.C. §§ 3801- 3812, which details the administrative remedies for false claims and statements made.)
Article 18 Federal Debt Status
All recipients are required to be non-delinquent in their repayment of any federal debt. Examples of relevant debt include delinquent payroll and other taxes, audit disallowances, and benefit overpayments. (See OMB Circular A- 129.)
Article 19 Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging while Driving Recipients are encouraged to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving recipient-owned, recipient-rented, or privately owned vehicles when on official government business or when performing any work for or on behalf of the Federal Government. Recipients are also encouraged to conduct the initiatives of the type described in Section 3(a) of E.O. 13513.

Article 20 Fly America Act of 1974
Recipients must comply with Preference for U.S. Flag Air Carriers (a list of certified air carriers can be found at: Certificated Air Carriers List | US Department of Transportation, https://www.transportation.gov/policy/aviation- policy/certificated-air-carriers-list)for international air transportation of people and property to the extent that such service is available, in accordance with the International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act of 1974, 49 U.S.C. § 40118, and the interpretative guidelines issued by the Comptroller General of the United States in the March 31, 1981, amendment to Comptroller General Decision B-138942.

Article 21 Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990
Recipients must ensure that all conference, meeting, convention, or training space funded entirely or in part by federal award funds complies with the fire prevention and control guidelines of Section 6 of the Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990, 15 U.S.C. § 2225a.

Article 22 John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2019
Recipients, subrecipients, and their contractors and subcontractors are subject to the prohibitions described in section 889 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Pub. L. No. 115-232 (2018) and 2 C.F.R. §§ 200.216, 200.327, 200.471, and Appendix II to 2 C.F.R. Part 200. The statute – as it applies to DHS recipients, subrecipients, and their contractors and subcontractors – prohibits obligating or expending federal award funds on certain telecommunications and video surveillance products and contracting with certain entities for national security reasons.

Article 23 Limited English Proficiency (Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI) Recipients must comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.) prohibition against discrimination on the basis of national origin, which requires that recipients of federal financial assistance take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to persons with limited English proficiency (LEP) to their programs and services. For additional assistance and information regarding language access obligations, please refer to the DHS Recipient Guidance: https://www.dhs.gov/guidance- published-help- department-supported-organizations-provide-meaningful- access-people-limited and additional resources on http://www.lep.gov.

Article 24 Lobbying Prohibitions
Recipients must comply with 31 U.S.C. § 1352 and 6 C.F.R. Part 9, which provide that none of the funds provided under a federal award may be expended by the recipient to pay any person to influence, or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any federal action related to a federal award or contract, including any extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification.

Per 6 C.F.R. Part 9, recipients must file a lobbying certification form as described in Appendix A to 6 C.F.R. Part 9 or available on Grants.gov as the Grants.gov Lobbying Form and file a lobbying disclosure form as described in Appendix B to 6 C.F.R. Part 9 or available on Grants.gov as the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL).

Article 25 National Environmental Policy Act
Recipients must comply with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Pub. L. No. 91-190 (1970) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.) (NEPA) and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA, which require recipients to use all practicable means within their authority, and consistent with other essential considerations of national policy, to create and maintain conditions under which people and nature can exist in productive harmony and fulfill the social, economic, and other needs of present and future generations of Americans.

Article 26 Nondiscrimination in Matters Pertaining to Faith-Based Organizations It is DHS policy to ensure the equal treatment of faith-based organizations in social service programs administered or supported by DHS or its component agencies, enabling those organizations to participate in providing important social services to beneficiaries. Recipients must comply with the equal treatment policies and requirements contained in 6 C.F.R. Part 19 and other applicable statues, regulations, and guidance governing the participations of faith- based organizations in individual DHS programs.

Article 27 Non-Supplanting Requirement
Recipients of federal awards under programs that prohibit supplanting by law must ensure that federal funds supplement but do not supplant non-federal funds that, in the absence of such federal funds, would otherwise have been made available for the same purpose.

Article 28 Notice of Funding Opportunity Requirements
All the instructions, guidance, limitations, scope of work, and other conditions set forth in the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for this federal award are incorporated by reference. All recipients must comply with any such requirements set forth in the NOFO. If a condition of the NOFO is inconsistent with these terms and conditions and any such terms of the Award, the condition in the NOFO shall be invalid to the extent of the inconsistency. The remainder of that condition and all other conditions set forth in the NOFO shall remain in effect.

Article 29 Patents and Intellectual Property Rights
Recipients are subject to the Bayh-Dole Act, 35 U.S.C. § 200 et seq. and applicable regulations governing inventions and patents, including the regulations issued by the Department of Commerce at 37 C.F.R. Part 401 (Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms under Government Awards, Contracts, and Cooperative Agreements) and the standard patent rights clause set forth at 37 C.F.R. § 401.14.

Article 30 Procurement of Recovered Materials
States, political subdivisions of states, and their contractors must comply with Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, Pub. L. No. 89-272 (1965) (codified as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act at 42 U.S.C. § 6962) and 2 C.F.R. § 200.323. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 C.F.R. Part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition.

Article 31 Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Recipients must comply with the requirements of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. No. 93-112 (codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. § 794), which provides that no otherwise qualified handicapped individuals in the United States will, solely by reason of the handicap, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.

Article 32 Reporting of Matters Related to Recipient Integrity and Performance If the total value of any currently active grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from all federal awarding agencies exceeds $10,000,000 for any period of time during the period of performance of the federal award, then the recipient must comply with the requirements set forth in the government-wide Award Term and Condition for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters located at 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix XII, the full text of which is incorporated by reference.

Article 33 Reporting Subawards and Executive Compensation For federal awards that equal or exceed $30,000, recipients are required to comply with the requirements set forth in the government-wide award term on Reporting Subawards and Executive Compensation set forth at 2 C.F.R. Part 170, Appendix A, the full text of which is incorporated by reference.

Article 34 Required Use of American Iron, Steel, Manufactured Products, and Construction Materials
Recipients of an award of Federal financial assistance from a program for infrastructure are hereby notified that none of the funds provided under this award may be used for a project for infrastructure unless: (1) all iron and steel used in the project are produced in the United States—this means all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States; (2) all manufactured products used in the project are produced in the United States—this means the manufactured product was manufactured in the United States; and the cost of the components of the manufactured product that are mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States is greater than 55 percent of the total cost of all components of the manufactured product, unless another standard for determining the minimum amount of domestic content of the manufactured product has been established under applicable law or regulation; and (3) all construction materials are manufactured in the United States—this means that all manufacturing processes for the construction material occurred in the United States. The Buy America preference only applies to articles, materials, and supplies that are consumed in, incorporated into, or affixed to an infrastructure project. As such, it does not apply to tools, equipment, and supplies, such as temporary scaffolding, brought to the construction site and removed at or before the completion of the infrastructure project. Nor does a Buy America preference apply to equipment and furnishings, such as movable chairs, desks, and portable computer equipment, that are used at or within the finished infrastructure project but are not an integral part of the structure or permanently affixed to the infrastructure project. Waivers When necessary, recipients may apply for, and the agency may grant, a waiver from these requirements. The agency should notify the recipient for information on the process for requesting a waiver from these requirements. (a) When the Federal agency has determined that one of the following exceptions applies, the awarding official may waive the application of the domestic content procurement preference in any case in which the agency determines that: (1) applying the domestic content procurement preference would be inconsistent with the public interest; (2) the types of iron, steel, manufactured products, or construction materials are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities or of a satisfactory quality; or (3) the inclusion of iron, steel, manufactured products, or construction materials produced in the United States will increase the cost of the overall project by more than 25 percent. A request to waive the application of the domestic content procurement preference must be in writing. The agency will provide instructions on the format, contents, and supporting materials required for any waiver request. Waiver requests are subject to public comment periods of no less than 15 days and must be reviewed by the Made in America Office. There may be instances where an award qualifies, in whole or in part, for an existing waiver described at “Buy America” Preference in FEMA Financial Assistance Programs for Infrastructure | FEMA.gov. Definitions The definitions applicable to this term are set forth at 2 C.F.R. § 184.3, the full text of which is incorporated by reference.

Article 35 SAFECOM
Recipients receiving federal financial assistance awards made under programs that provide emergency communication equipment and its related activities must comply with the SAFECOM Guidance for Emergency Communication Grants, including provisions on technical standards that ensure and enhance interoperable communications. The SAFECOM Guidance is updated annually and can be found at Funding and Sustainment | CISA.

Article 36 Terrorist Financing
Recipients must comply with E.O. 13224 and applicable statutory prohibitions on transactions with, and the provisions of resources and support to, individuals and organizations associated with terrorism. Recipients are legally responsible for ensuring compliance with the E.O. and laws.

Article 37 Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA) Recipients must comply with the requirements of the government-wide financial assistance award term which implements Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-386, § 106 (codified as amended at 22 U.S.C. § 7104). The award term is located at 2 C.F.R. § 175.15, the full text of which is incorporated by reference.

Article 38 Universal Identifier and System of Award Management Recipients are required to comply with the requirements set forth in the government-wide financial assistance award term regarding the System for Award Management and Universal Identifier Requirements located at 2 C.F.R. Part 25, Appendix A, the full text of which is incorporated reference.

Article 39 USA PATRIOT Act of 2001
Recipients must comply with requirements of Section 817 of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act), which amends 18 U.S.C. §§ 175–175c.

Article 40 Use of DHS Seal, Logo and Flags
Recipients must obtain written permission from DHS prior to using the DHS seals, logos, crests, or reproductions of flags, or likenesses of DHS agency officials. This includes use of DHS component (e.g., FEMA, CISA, etc.) seals, logos, crests, or reproductions of flags, or likenesses of component officials.

Article 41 Whistleblower Protection Act
Recipients must comply with the statutory requirements for whistleblower protections at 10 U.S.C § 470141 U.S.C. § 4712.

Article 42 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Review DHS/FEMA funded activities that may require an Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) review are subject to the FEMA EHP review process. This review does not address all federal, state, and local requirements. Acceptance of federal funding requires the recipient to comply with all federal, state and local laws. DHS/FEMA is required to consider the potential impacts to natural and cultural resources of all projects funded by DHS/FEMA grant funds, through its EHP review process, as mandated by:
the National Environmental Policy Act; National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended; National Flood Insurance Program regulations; and any other applicable laws and executive orders. General guidance for FEMA’s EHP process is available on the DHS/FEMA Website at:
https://www.fema.gov/grants/guidance-tools/environmental-historic. Specific applicant guidance on how to submit information for EHP review depends on the individual grant program and applicants should contact their grant Program Officer to be put into contact with EHP staff responsible for assisting their specific grant program. The EHP review process must be completed before funds are released to carry out the proposed project; otherwise, DHS/FEMA may not be able to fund the project due to noncompliance with EHP laws, executive orders, regulations, and policies. If ground disturbing activities occur during construction, applicant will monitor ground disturbance, and if any potential archaeological resources are discovered the applicant will immediately cease work in that area and notify the pass-through entity, if applicable, and DHS/FEMA.

Article 43 Applicability of DHS Standard Terms and Conditions to Tribes The DHS Standard Terms and Conditions are a restatement of general requirements imposed upon recipients and flow down to sub-recipients as a matter of law, regulation, or executive order. If the requirement does not apply to Indian tribes or there is a federal law or regulation exempting its application to Indian tribes, then the acceptance by Tribes of, or acquiescence to, DHS Standard Terms and Conditions does not change or alter its inapplicability to an Indian tribe. The execution of grant documents is not intended to change, alter, amend, or impose additional liability or responsibility upon the Tribe where it does not already exist.

Article 44 Acceptance of Post Award Changes
In the event FEMA determines that an error in the award package has been made, or if an administrative change must be made to the award package, recipients will be notified of the change in writing. Once the notification has been made, any subsequent requests for funds will indicate recipient acceptance of the changes to the award. Please call FEMA Grant Management Operations at (866) 927-5646 or via e-mail to: ASK- [email protected] if you have any questions.

Article 45 Disposition of Equipment Acquired Under the Federal Award For purposes of original or replacement equipment acquired under this award by a non-state recipient or non-state sub-recipients, when that equipment is no longer needed for the original project or program or for other activities currently or previously supported by a federal awarding agency, you must request instructions from FEMA to make proper disposition of the equipment pursuant to 2 C.F.R. section 200.313. State recipients and state sub- recipients must follow the disposition requirements in accordance with state laws and procedures.

Article 46 Prior Approval for Modification of Approved Budget Before making any change to the FEMA approved budget for this award, you must request prior written approval from FEMA where required by 2 C.F.R. section 200.308. For purposes of non-construction projects, FEMA is utilizing its discretion to impose an additional restriction under 2 C.F.R. section 200.308(f) regarding the transfer of funds among direct cost categories, programs, functions, or activities. Therefore, for awards with an approved budget where the federal share is greater than the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $250,000), you may not transfer funds among direct cost categories, programs, functions, or activities without prior written approval from FEMA where the cumulative amount of such transfers exceeds or is expected to exceed ten percent (10%) of the total budget FEMA last approved. For purposes of awards that support both construction and non- construction work, FEMA is utilizing its discretion under 2 C.F.R. section 200.308(h)(5) to require the recipient to obtain prior written approval from FEMA before making any fund or budget transfers between the two types of work. You must report any deviations from your FEMA approved budget in the first Federal Financial Report (SF-425) you submit following any budget deviation, regardless of whether the budget deviation requires prior written approval.

Article 47 Indirect Cost Rate
2 C.F.R. section 200.211(b)(15) requires the terms of the award to include the indirect cost rate for the federal award. If applicable, the indirect cost rate for this award is stated in the budget documents or other materials approved by FEMA and included in the award file.

Article 48 Award Performance Goals
FEMA will measure the recipient’s performance of the grant by comparing the number of items requested in its application, the numbers acquired (ordered, paid, and received) within the period of performance. In order to measure performance, FEMA may request information throughout the period of performance. In its final performance report submitted at closeout, the recipient is required to report on the recipients compliance with the applicable industry, local, state and national standards described in the NOFO.

Obligating document

1. Agreement
No.

EMW-2023-FG-
03821

2. Amendment
No.

N/A

3. Recipient
No.
946000459

4. Type of
Action
AWARD

5. Control No.

WX03513N2024T

6. Recipient Name and
Address

WOODLAND FIRE

DEPARTMENT
1000 LINCOLN AVE
WOODLAND, CA 95695

7. Issuing FEMA Office
and Address
Grant Programs Directorate
500 C Street, S.W.

Washington DC, 20528-7000
1-866-927-5646

8. Payment Office and
Address
FEMA, Financial
Services Branch
500 C Street, S.W.,
Room 723
Washington DC, 20742

9. Name of Recipient
Project Officer
Jeran Scruggs
9a. Phone
No.
530-
6615875

10. Name of FEMA Project
Coordinator
Assistance to Firefighters
Grant Program
10a. Phone
No.
1-866-274-
0960

11. Effective Date of
This Action
07/08/2024

12. Method of
Payment

OTHER - FEMA
GO

13. Assistance
Arrangement

COST SHARING

14. Performance
Period
07/15/2024 to
07/14/2026
Budget Period
07/15/2024 to
07/14/2026

15. Description of Action a. (Indicate funding data for awards or financial changes)
Program
Name
Abbreviation
Assistance
Listings
No.

Accounting
Data(ACCS
Code)
Prior
Total
Award
Amount
Awarded
This
Action +
or (-)
Current
Total
Award
Cumulative
Non-Federal
Commitment
FG 97.044
2024-F3-
GB01 -
P410-xxxx-
4101-D
$0.00 $35,690.90$35,690.90$3,569.10
Totals$0.00 $35,690.90$35,690.90$3,569.10
b. To describe changes other than funding data or financial changes, attach schedule and check here:

N/A

16.FOR NON-DISASTER PROGRAMS: RECIPIENT IS REQUIRED TO SIGN AND RETURN THREE (3) COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT TO FEMA (See Block 7 for address)
This field is not applicable for digitally signed grant agreements

17. RECIPIENT SIGNATORY OFFICIAL (Name and Title)
Jeran Scruggs
DATE
07/12/2024

18. FEMA SIGNATORY OFFICIAL (Name and Title)
PAMELA WILLIAMS, Assistant Administrator, Grant Programs DATE
07/08/2024

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.7
SUBJECT: City of Woodland Prohousing Incentive Program
Application

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No.____, authorizing an application for, and receipt of, Prohousing Incentive Program funds.

Staff Contact:

Spencer Bowen, Communication & Strategic Policies Manager | (530) 661-5808, [email protected]
Amanda Portier, Marketing & Business Relations Specialist | (530) 661-5920, [email protected]

Background:

The California Department of Housing and Community Development's (HCD) Prohousing Incentive Program provides funding for planning and implementation activities related to housing and community development for municipalities that are Prohousing Designated by December 31, 2024.

The Program is funded through Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017 (SB 2, Atkins), which established the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund (Fund). The Fund utilizes real estate transaction fees collected at the county level to establish a permanent source of funding. Five percent of annual collections are deposited in a fund to be used for an incentive program. The Program awards funds based on the applicant's Prohousing Designation Program Score.

Discussion:

The City of Woodland applied for the Prohousing Designation Program on December 6, 2024. HCD representatives advised City staff to complete a Prohousing Incentive Program application in anticipation of receiving Prohousing designation by December 31, 2024. This agenda item will position the City to apply quickly for the resources mentioned above should HCD designate Woodland as a "Prohousing" municipality.

If Woodland receives Prohousing designation by December 31, the City will be eligible for up to $950,000 in Prohousing Incentive Program funds. These funds will support affordable housing projects that advance the City's housing goals.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No.____, authorizing an application for, and receipt of, Prohousing Incentive Program funds.

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - Prohousing Incentive Program

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR, AND RECEIPT OF, PROHOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM FUNDS.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code 50470 et. Seq, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) is authorized to issue Guidelines as part of an incentive program (hereinafter referred to by the Department as the Prohousing Incentive Program or “PIP”); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Woodland desires to submit a PIP grant application package (“Application”), on the forms provided by the Department, for approval of grant funding for eligible activities toward planning and implementation activities related to housing and community development as a result of meeting eligibility criteria including but not limited to Prohousing Designation; and WHEREAS, the Department has issued Guidelines and Application on August 15, 2024 in the amount of $8,000,000 for PIP.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1.The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department in response to the NOFA, and to apply for the PIP grant funds in a total amount not to exceed $950,000.

SECTION 2.In connection with the PIP grant, if the Application is approved by the Department, the City Manager of the City of Woodland is authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver on behalf of the Applicant, a State of California Agreement (Standard Agreement) for an amount up to $950,000, and any and all other documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to evidence and secure the PIP grant, the Applicant’s obligations related thereto, and all amendments thereto.

SECTION 3.The Applicant shall be subject to the terms and conditions as specified in the Guidelines, and the Standard Agreement provided by the Department after approval. The Application and any and all accompanying documents are incorporated in full as part of the Standard Agreement. Any and all activities funded, information provided, and timelines represented in the Application will be enforceable through the fully executed Standard Agreement. Pursuant to the Guidelines and in conjunction with the terms of the Standard Agreement, the Applicant hereby agrees to use the funds for eligible uses and allowable expenditures in the manner presented and specifically identified in the approved Application.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of December 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN: ________________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ________________________________ Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.8
SUBJECT: Waiver of Second Reading and Adoption of
Ordinance No. ____, Amending Section 15.16.200 of
the Woodland Municipal Code

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that City Council waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. _____, to amend Section 15.16.200 of Chapter 15.16 of the Woodland Municipal Code to provide additional alternative means of compliance with the City’s affordable housing requirements.

Staff Contact:

Ken Hiatt, City Manager (530) 661-5802, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Background:

At the December 3, 2024 City Council meeting, the City Council voted to introduce and waive the first reading of Ordinance No. _____ following a staff presentation. The presentation consisted of the proposed amendments to Section 15.16.200 of Chapter 15.16 of the Woodland Municipal Code.

Should Council choose to waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. _____ at tonight's meeting, the Ordinance would be effective January 16, 2025, thirty days from the second reading.

The proposed ordinance would add a new subparagraph D. to Section 15.16.200 of the Woodland Municipal Code, which describes the alternatives to on-site construction of affordable units under the requirements of the City’s Affordable Housing Ordinance. The new subsection D. allows that a developer may receive credit on a unit-for-unit basis towards the requirements of the Affordable Housing Ordinance for the development of off-site affordable units either by the developer, or pursuant to an agreement between the developer and a third party affordable housing developer that contemplates that the off-site units will be credited toward developer’s affordable housing obligations.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that City Council waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. _____, to amend Section 15.16.200 of Chapter 15.16 of the Woodland Municipal Code to provide additional alternative means of compliance with the City’s affordable housing requirements.

Attachments:

1. Proposed Ordinance - Amending AHO Alt Means of Compliance_2nd Reading

ORDINANCE NO. _____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND AMENDING SECTION 15.16.200 OF CHAPTER 15.16 OF THE WOODLAND

MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY’S AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Woodland, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City has enacted Chapter 15.16 of the Woodland Municipal Code (the “Affordable Housing Ordinance”), which imposes certain requirements upon private residential development in the City to require that a portion of dwelling units contained in new residential developments in the City be sold or rented at an affordable housing cost to very low, low and moderate income families; and
WHEREAS, the Affordable Housing Ordinance provides the City with the discretion to permit residential developers to satisfy the requirements of the Affordable Housing Ordinance through certain alternative means of compliance, which include the dedication of land, or the payment of affordable housing in-lieu fees under terms and conditions as more specifically set forth in the Affordable Housing Ordinance, or a combination of land dedication and payment of affordable housing in-lieu fees; and
WHEREAS, in order to increase the City’s ability to provide flexible means of compliance with the City’s affordable housing requirements in order to better facilitate the production of housing in the City in general and the production of affordable housing in particular, the City desires to amend the Affordable Housing Ordinance to provide additional means of compliance with the Affordable Housing Ordinance allowing developers to received credit toward their affordable housing requirements through the development of off-site units by the developer or through an agreement between the developer and a third party affordable housing developer; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Woodland does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Ordinance.

SECTION 2. Amendments to Section 15.16.200. Section 15.16.200 of Chapter 15,16 of the Woodland Municipal Code is hereby is hereby amended as provided in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 3. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or

indirectly. Further, if the activity is deemed a project this City Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

SECTION 4. Severability. If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are declared to be severable.

SECTION 5. Effective Date. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published in a newspaper of general circulation at least five (5) days prior to the meeting at which the proposed ordinance is to be adopted and shall post a certified copy of the proposed ordinance in the office of the City Clerk, and within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, shall cause a summary of it to be published, including the vote for and against the same, and shall post a certified copy of the adopted ordinance in the office of the City Clerk, in accordance with California Government Code Section 36933. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Woodland, California on the 3rd day of December, 2024, and PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 17 th day of December, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ____________________________ Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

EXHIBIT A
§15.16.200Alternatives to on-site construction of affordable units.

A. Alternative Means of Compliance. As an alternative to on-site construction of the affordable units as set forth in this chapter, the City may, at its discretion, permit the developer to satisfy the requirements of this chapter through one or more of the alternative means of compliance as described in this section.

B. Land Dedication.

1. A developer may be allowed to make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City or its designee of sufficient land to satisfy the affordability requirement under this section, if either:
a. The developer demonstrates to the City Council that it is not feasible to develop the affordable dwelling units on-site as part of the residential project; or b.In the judgment of the Community Development Director, the developer's proposed land dedication would accomplish the objectives of this chapter.

2. Dedicated sites for residential projects shall meet the following criteria:
a. The dedicated site shall be a minimum of two acres unless the City agrees to a smaller site based on a special housing need.
b.The dedicated site shall be economically feasible to develop, of sufficient size to build the required number of affordable units and physically suitable for development of the required affordable units prior to the dedication of the land.

The City may, at its discretion, accept a dedicated site that will provide a different housing type than would be required if the affordable units were constructed on- site, if in the judgment of the Community Development Director such dedication would accomplish the objectives of this chapter.
c.The dedicated site shall also have appropriate General Plan designation and zoning to accommodate not less than the required number of units, be fully improved with infrastructure, frontage improvements (i.e., curb, gutter, walk), paved street access, utility (i.e., water, gas, sewer and electric) service connections stubbed to the property lines, and other such off-site improvements as may be necessary for development of the required affordable units or as required by the City.
d. The value of the dedicated site shall be equal to or greater than the in-lieu fee in effect at the date of dedication for the applicable residential development multiplied by the number of otherwise required inclusionary units within the residential development.

3. The City may approve, conditionally approve, or reject such offer of land dedication of any specific property. If the City rejects such an offer of land dedication, the developer shall be required to meet the affordable housing obligations by other means set forth in this chapter.

4. Density Credit. In determining the amount of land to dedicate to satisfy a developer's affordable housing obligation, the developer shall receive credit for the base density of the dedicated site (e.g., 20 units per acre if the dedicated parcel is zoned to require residential density of 20 units per acre or greater).

5. Development of Dedicated Land. Within one year from the date of conveyance of the dedicated land to the City, the City shall determine, at its discretion, whether the dedicated land will be:
a. Developed by the City to produce the required affordable dwelling units; or b.Conveyed to an affordable housing developer approved by the City to produce the required affordable dwelling units. The City Council shall determine which affordable housing developer shall be conveyed the land required to produce the affordable dwelling units.

C. In-Lieu Fees.

1. The developer may be permitted to pay in-lieu fees to satisfy all or a part of the developer's affordable housing obligation if either:
a. The developer demonstrates to the City Council that it is not feasible to develop the affordable dwelling units on-site as part of the residential project; or b. In the judgment of the Community Development Director, the payment of in-lieu fees would accomplish the objectives of this chapter.

2. The payment amount of in-lieu fees shall be determined pursuant to an adopted fee schedule designating in-lieu fees for either or both for-sale affordable units and for rental affordable units, to be reviewed and revised as necessary on an annual basis. In the event a fee schedule has not been adopted, the City Council may allow payment of in-lieu fees upon review of the project's affordable housing plan and as memorialized in a documented agreement.

3. If the City determines that the developer may contribute in-lieu fees, the developer must pay such fees as calculated on a per unit basis prior to the issuance of building permits for the residential project. No building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued by the City until proof of in-lieu fees is provided.

D. Credits for Development of Off-Site Units. The developer may receive credit on a unit- for-unit basis toward satisfaction of the requirements of this Chapter for the development of off-site affordable units by the developer or pursuant to an agreement between the developer and a third party affordable housing developer if the City Council finds that:

1. The off-site units will be sold or rented at or below the affordability levels that would be required by this Chapter for the development of on-site affordable units as part of the market rate development receiving credit for its affordable housing requirements; or

2. The off-site affordable units will be produced and available for rental or sale sooner than would be required for the development of on-site affordable units; and

3. The off-site units will be subject to and will comply with all requirements of this Chapter applicable to affordable units.

E. Combination of Methods to Provide Inclusionary Housing. The developer of a project may propose any combination of the requirements for the construction of on-site affordable units pursuant to this chapter and/or alternative options pursuant to this section in order to comply with the provisions of this chapter. Such proposals shall be made in and considered by the City as part of the developer's application for development entitlements, and approved by the City if the City Council finds that the combined construction of affordable units and/or alternative methods of compliance provide substantially the same or greater level of affordability and the amount of affordable housing is as required pursuant to this chapter

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.9
SUBJECT: Approve the Plans, Specifications and Bid
Authorization for Pedestrian Crossing Improvements
Project, CIP 22-15

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving the project plans and specifications and authorizing the bid advertisement for the Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Project, CIP 22-15.

Staff Contact:

Sara Andreotti, Engineering Assistant, (530) 661-5951, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The approved Capital Budget includes $360,000 in funding for the Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Project, CIP 22-15, consisting of $250,000 of Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funding (Fund 351) and $110,000 in matching funding from the Road Development Fund (Fund 582). The project budget includes the costs for design, project management, construction management/inspection and construction. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Background:

In March 2021, the City of Woodland was awarded $250,000 from the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) to implement upgrades to existing lighted school pedestrian crossings. This grant award followed a competitive statewide application review and selection process. The HSIP is a core federal-aid program with the goal of reducing traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roads. The project sites were selected from a list of existing lighted crosswalks and prioritized after traffic engineering staff consulted with local stakeholders including Public Works, Woodland Police Department, and school representatives including principals and teachers. The final selection considered multiple factors including maintenance history, traffic speed, vehicle collision history, and the potential for upgrades to address any identified safety concerns.

Each of the selected locations was initially constructed using safety grant funding and the equipment installed complied with best practices and guidelines in effect at the time. At present, these sites feature some or all of the following features: yellow flashing beacons, in-pavement warning lights and/or radar speed feedback signs. Yellow flashing beacons serve as warning devices for motorists and are often paired with in-pavement warning lights at critical crossings to enhance visibility of the crossings. However, the use of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) has been deemed a more effective and more highly visibile alternative to these two features. The RRFBs have been proven to significantly improve driver compliance with "yield to pedestrian" laws, exhibiting higher rates of compliance compared to traditional round yellow flashing beacons with or without in- pavement warning lights.

In addition to RRFBs, speed feedback signs have long been identified as effective tools for enhancing pedestrian safety. These dynamic signs do not require parking restrictions and are less likely to lead to driver desensitization compared to static signs. As part of the City's broader efforts to address speed-related safety concerns, many of the targeted locations currently feature speed feedback signs to increase driver awareness of their travel speeds.

When the initial safety measures were implemented, solar-powered devices were often considered the most cost-effective and appropriate solution for implementation in existing roadways. However, nearly a decade later, the performance of these devices has proven less than satisfactory. The solar- powered systems have shown diminished functionality during extended periods of cloud cover, particularly in winter months, and have required frequent maintenance and costly replacements. As a result, the City has begun transitioning to AC-powered RRFBs, which offer more reliable performance and lower long-term maintenance costs. This transition will ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of the City's pedestrian safety efforts.

Discussion:

The project includes installation of AC powered RRFB and speed feedback signs, upgraded signage and the refreshing of pavement markings at the following pedestrian crossing locations:
• Dingle Elementary: College St. & Oak Ave
• Maxwell Elementary: Ashley Ave.- South of Beamer St.
• Zamora Elementary: El Dorado Dr. & Edwin Ave.
• Gibson Elementary: College St. & Truckee Pl.

Upon Council authorization, project bids will be solicited, and staff anticipates construction will start early July 2024, after school is released for the summer, and be complete by August 2024.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving the project plans and specifications and authorizing the bid advertisement for the Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Project, CIP 22-15.

Prepared by: Sara Andreotti, Engineering Assistant

Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, CDD Director/City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - Plans, Specs, Bid Authorization CIP 22-15

2. CIP 22-15 Project Location Map

RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING BID

ADVERTISEMENT FOR THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT, CIP 22-15
WHEREAS, the approved Capital Budget includes $360,000 in funding for the Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Project, CIP 22-15, consisting of $250,000 of Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant funding (Fund 351) and $110,000 in matching funding from the Road Development Fund (Fund 582); and WHEREAS, the Project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Project is to be exempt under CEQA Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to approve the plans and specifications and authorize bidding for the project through the adoption of this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1.The City Council hereby approves the plans and specifications for the Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Project, CIP 22-15, which are available on file with the City Clerk.

SECTION 2.The City Council authorizes staff to advertise the Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Project, CIP 22-15 for bids.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of December 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

W
A
L
N
U
T

S
T
C
O
L
O
M
A
W
A
Y
C
R
O
S
S

S
T
M
C
K
I
N
L
E
Y
A
V
E
C
O
U
N
T
Y

R
O
A
D

9 8
W

M
A
I
N

S
T
E
A
S
T

S
T
M
A
T
M
O
R

R
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y

R
O
A
D

1 0
2 S
O
U
T
H
W
O
O
D

D
R
F
I
R
S
T

S
T
B
E
A
M
E
R

S
T
N

W
E
S
T

S
T
W
E
S
T

S
T
W

G
I
B
S
O
N

R
D
M
A
I
N

S
T
C
O
U
R
T

S
T
K
E
N
T
U
C
K
Y

A
V
E
G
I
B
S
O
N

R
D
B
A
R
T
L
E
T
T

A
V
E
E

G
I
B
S
O
N

R
D
P
I
O
N
E
E
R

A
V
E
E
A
S
T

S
T
E

K
E
N
T
U
C
K
Y

A
V
E
E

M
A
I
N

S
T
N

P
I
O
N
E
E
R

A
V
E
C
O
U
N
T
Y

R
O
A
D

9 9
E

B
E
A
M
E
R

S
T
G
U
M

A
V
E
E
L

D
O
R
A
D
O

D
R
N

C
O
L
L
E
G
E

S
T
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A

S
T
C
O
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D

S
T
C
O
L
L
E
G
E

S
T
N

A
S
H
L
E
Y

A
V
E
A
S
H
L
E
Y

A
V
E
T
H
I
R
D

S
T
E

G
U
M

A
V
E
W

W
O
O
D
L
A
N
D

A
V
E
H
E
R
I
T
A
G
E

P
K
W
Y
M
A
T
M
O
R

R
D
E
A
S
T

S
T
H
A
R
R
Y

L
O
R
E
N
Z
O

A
V
E
§
¨
¦
5 |
ÿ
1 1
3 0
0 .
5 1
0 .
2 5
M
i
l
e
s
¹
1 :
2 4
,
0 0
0 1

i
n
c
h

=

2 ,
0 0
0 f
e
e
t
C
i
t
y

o
f

W
o
o
d
l
a
n
d
,

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

2 0
2 0

!
P
!
)
W
o
o
d
l
a
n
d
S
a
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o
L
o
s

A
n
g
e
l
e
s
S
a
n
F
r
a
n
c
i
s
c
o
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
)
)
Project Locations
)
)
)
)
Dingle Elementary Crossing
Gibson Elementary Crossing
Maxwell Elementary Crossing
Zamora Elementary Crossing
City of Woodland
Pedestrian Crossings
Improvements Project
Location Map

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.10
SUBJECT: Approve the Plans, Specifications and Bid
Authorization for Community Center Parking Lot
Expansion, CIP 24-08

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No ____, 1) Approving the project plans and specifications and authorizing the bid advertisement of the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, CIP 24-08; and 2) Approving a consultant services amendment for design services with Laugenour and Meikle in the amount of $17,875 for a total agreement amount of $173,216 and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment for the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, CIP 24-08.

Staff Contact:

Clara Olmedo, Associate Engineer, (530) 661-5824, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The project is currently funded in the Capital Budget with $1,500,000 in Capital Projects Funds (Fund 1501). It is likely that additional funding will be required to cover expanded project scope which includes additional electric vehicle charging and expanded landscape scope. An updated budget analysis will be prepared after receiving the bids. The Construction Contract Award will be presented to Council for approval at a future date, at which time additional Measure F Funds may be allocated to the project.

Background:

On September 25, 2017, the Parks & Recreation Commission approved a conceptual plan of new parks and recreation facilities at the Woodland Sports Park. The recommendation presented to the Parks & Recreation Commission was the result of a City Council and Parks & Recreation Commission subcommittee tasked with evaluating current and future recreation facility needs. On October 17, 2017, staff presented the conceptual master plan for buildout of the Woodland Sports Park to the City Council. Following that meeting, the master plan was further refined and once again presented to Council on March 6, 2018.

Recommendations included in the master plan reports provided to the Parks & Recreation Commission and the City Council were provided as “Level A” and “Level B” recommendations: “Level A” projects are those that have the highest current need based on community need. “Level B” projects are projects that have an acknowledged high level of need and take a second priority only to the Level A projects. The need to construct additional parking was identified as a “Level A” recommendation. The master plan identified the turf area in front of the main entrance to the Community & Senior Center as the area to provide the additional parking. With the new aquatic center scheduled to open in Fall 2025, there is a need to complete parking lot improvements and address the parking deficiency when holding larger events at the Woodland Sports Park.

The City Council authorized a design services contract award in January 2024. The design of the project includes conversion of the existing turf area fronting East Street to additional parking. A total of 96 new parking spaces, including 8 ADA accessible spaces and 4 electric vehicle charging stations, will be added with the project. In addition, the project will install infrastructure to provide 28

EV capable parking spaces for future equipping as EV charging stations.

Discussion:

Staff is requesting City Council approval of the construction documents and authorization to advertise the project for bids. Upon Council approval, the construction documents will be advertised in January for a bid opening in early February. Staff anticipates that the construction contract award will be presented to Council for approval in mid-February so that construction can commence in the Spring.

Construction is anticipated to take approximately 6 months, with project completion estimated in Fall of 2025, before the new aquatics center is scheduled to open.

Laugenour and Meikle (L&M) were chosen to design the project and the contract agreement was approved by Council on January 16, 2024 in an amount of $136,541 with a contingency amount of 15%. During design, the project scope was expanded to include additional vehicle charging infrastructure to take advantage of PG&E grant funds available for government agencies endeavoring to convert fleet vehicles to electric. Planning for this infrastructure now, when the City is already required to install EV charging stations to meet the State code requirements for parking lot construction, will save the City money. The scope of civil and landscape improvements was also expanded to address poor drainage on the East Street shoulder.

Pursuant to CEQA Section 15162, the project improvements are consistent with the prior approved Negative Declaration (SCH #2002122059, Community/Senior Center Community Park) for the 40- acre community park with community/senior center certified on January 21, 2003, and no additional environmental analysis is required for the project.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No ____, 1) Approving the project plans and specifications and authorizing the bid advertisement of the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, CIP 24-08; and 2) Approving a consultant services amendment for design services with Laugenour and Meikle in the amount of $17,875 for a total agreement amount of $173,216 and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment for the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, CIP 24-08.

Prepared by: Clara Olmedo, Associate Engineer

Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, Community Development Director / City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - Plans, Specifications, Bid Authorization, CIP 24-08

2. Site & Landscape Planting Plans

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING

ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS AND APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE FOR DESIGN

SERVICES FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROJECT (CIP 24-08)
WHEREAS, the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, CIP 24-08 (the “Project”), is identified in the Capital Budget; and
WHEREAS, the Project is currently funded with $1,500,000 in General Capital Funds (Fund 1501) and appropriation of additional Measure F funds may be requested at award of construction contract to cover total project costs once the bid prices are known; and WHEREAS, master planning reports previously presented to Council in 2017 & 2018 identified a need for additional parking at the Woodland Sports Park; and WHERAS, the Project includes expansion of the existing Community & Senior Center parking lot to the existing turf area west of the main entrance, with an additional 96 parking stalls, including 8 new ADA stalls. Additionally, the Project will equip 4 existing parking spaces with EV charging equipment and will run infrastructure to an additional 14 stalls for future equipping; and
WHEREAS, the City entered into consultant services agreement with Laugenour & Meikle on January 16, 2024 in an amount of $136,541 with a contingency amount of 15%; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to approve an amendment to the Agreement dated January 29, 2024 and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Section 15162, the project improvements are consistent with the prior approved Negative Declaration (SCH #2002122059, Community/Senior Center Community Park) for the 40-acre community park with community/senior center certified on January 21, 2003, and no additional environmental analysis is required for the project; and WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority to approve projects for bid; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to approve the plans and specifications and authorize bid advertisement for the Project through adoption of this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1.The City Council hereby approves the plans and specifications for the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project (CIP 24-08), which will be available on file with the City Clerk.

SECTION 2.The City Council hereby authorizes staff to advertise for bids for the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project (CIP 24-08).

SECTION 3.The City Council hereby approves the consultant services contract amendment with Laugenour & Meikle and authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute the amendment in the amount of $17,875 for a total agreement amount of $173,216 for the Community Center Parking Lot Expansion Project, CIP 24-08.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of December 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ _____________________________ Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLECIVIL ENGINEERING · LAND SURVEYING · PLANNING· · LM
©LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE©LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE
©LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE©LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE
LM

LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLECIVIL ENGINEERING · LAND SURVEYING · PLANNING· · LM
©LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE©LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE
LM

LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLECIVIL ENGINEERING · LAND SURVEYING · PLANNING· · LM
©LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE©LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE
LM
©LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE©LAUGENOUR AND MEIKLE
LM

EAST STREET
+
50%50%100%
75%100%100%75%
75%75%
100%50%1ACE BUE4ACE BUE
3ACE FRE3TIL SIL50%
6PER ABR17ESC CAL
3PEN FLO4PEN FLO10MUH RIG
2PER ABR
75%
100%50%
75%
1ACE FRE8ROS OFF
5LAN MON6PER ABR
2ACE BUE4LAN MON
18MYO PAR10ACA RED15PEN FLO10SAL LEU10ACA RED14MUH CAP
11ESC CAL10CIS LAD7SAL LEU6PHO TEN13BAC PIL10MUH RIG1QUE RUB15ROS OFF 12MUH RIG
10CIS LAD
21SAL LEU
1TIL SIL26PHO TEN
6ARC EME13PEN FLO
18MUH RIG
1TIL SIL
5LAN MON
2PER ABR10MUH CAP
13LAV ANG13MUH RIG14LAV ANG10MUH RIG12SAL LEU
2PER ABR13MUH RIG10LAN MON14LAN MON
16PEN FLO
11ARC EME
50%25%
PLANT LEGENDROOT BARRIER: DEEP ROOT CORP. #UB18. INSTALL FLUSH WITH INSIDEFACE OF CURB OR PAVING IN LOCATIONS INDICATED. SHOWN ONOUTSIDE OF CURB FOR GRAPHIC PURPOSES ONLY.PLANTING NOTES 1.MULCH: INSTALL A UNIFORM THREE INCH COVERING OF MULCH IN ALL PLANTING AREAS,PER SPECIFICATIONS.2.EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL: PROTECT ALL EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL TO REMAIN. REPAIR ANYDAMAGES INCURRED AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THIS CONTRACT TO THE OWNER'SSATISFACTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST.3.GROUNDCOVER: PROVIDE GROUNDCOVER AT INDICATED ON-CENTER SPACINGTHROUGHOUT ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED. GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE PROVIDED UP TO THEWATERING BASIN OF ALL TREES AND SHRUBS.4.QUANTITIES: THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE LABELS ARE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS THECOMPLETE AND ACCURATE LIMITS OF THE CONTRACT. FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL PLANTSSHOWN SCHEMATICALLY ON THE DRAWINGS.5.SOILS TESTING: SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR TESTING OF TOPSOIL AND AMENDMENTS.CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR TESTING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.18PLANTING PLANPL-1 www.callanderassociates.com12150 Tributary Point Drive,Suite 140Gold River, CA 95670T 916.985.4366 31KEY MAPEAST STREETKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.Call R
NORTH0 feet201" = 20'40FOR PLANT SCHEDULE CONTINUED AND PARKINGLOT SHADE CALCULATIONS SEE SHEET PL-2 TURF SOD / 90% TALL FESCUE 10% BLUE GRASS SOD HIGH BARK MULCH ONLY, PER SPECSCOBBLE MULCH, PER SPECS CODEBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZEWATER USETREESACE BUEACER BUERGERIANUM / TRIDENT MAPLE15 GALMEDACE FJRACER RUBRUM 'FRANK JR.' / REDPOINTE® MAPLE24" BOXMEDACE FREACER X FREEMANII / FREEMAN MAPLE24" BOXMEDQUE RUBQUERCUS RUBRA / NORTHERN RED OAK24" BOXMEDTIL SILTILIA TOMENTOSA / SILVER LINDEN24" BOXMEDCODEBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZEWATER USESPACINGSHRUBSACA REDACACIA REDOLENS `LOW BOY` / LOW BOY BANK CATCLAW1 GALLOW72" o.c.ARC EMEARCTOSTAPHYLOS X 'EMERALD CARPET' / EMERALD CARPET MANZANITA1 GALLOW60" o.c.BAC PILBACCHARIS PILULARIS CONSANGUINEA / COYOTE BRUSH5 GALLOW72" o.c.CIS LADCISTUS LADANIFER / CRIMSON SPOT ROCKROSE5 GALLOW48" o.c.ESC CALESCHSCHOLZIA CALIFORNICA / CALIFORNIA POPPY1 GALLOW24" o.c.LAN CAMLANTANA CAMARA 'RADIATION' / RADIATION LANTANA1 GALLOW48" o.c.LAN MONLANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS 'SPREADING WHITE' / WHITE TRAILING LANTANA1 GALLOW48" o.c.LAV ANGLAVANDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA / ENGLISH LAVENDER1 GALLOW36" o.c.MUH CAPMUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS / PINK MUHLY GRASS1 GALLOW36" o.c.MUH RIGMUHLENBERGIA RIGENS / DEER GRASS5 GALLOW48" o.c.MYO PARMYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM / TRAILING MYOPORUM1 GALLOW96" o.c.PEN FLOPENSTEMON FLORIDUS / PANAMINT PENSTEMON1 GALLOW36" o.c.PER ABRPEROVSKIA ABROTANOIDES / RUSSIAN SAGE1 GALLOW48" o.c.PHO TENPHORMIUM TENAX 'RUBRUM' / NEW ZEALAND FLAX5 GALLOW48" o.c.ROS OFFROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'HUNTINGTON CARPET' /HUNTINGTON CARPET ROSEMARY5 GALLOW48" o.c.SAL LEUSALVIA LEUCANTHA `MIDNIGHT` / MIDNIGHT MEXICAN BUSH SAGE5 GALLOW60" o.c.

PLANT_SCHEDULE
GROUND COVERSNATIVE MOW FREE SOD AVAILABLE AT DELTA BLUE GRASS CO. SOD LOWWESTERN MOKELUME FESCUE - FESTUCA OCCIDENTALISIDAHO FESCUE - FESTUCA IDAHONESISMOLATE BLUE FESCUE - FESTUCA RUBRA

EAST STREET
75%100%100%100%100%100%50%50%100%75%
3ACE FRE
3ACE BUE
2PER ABR2PER ABR1ACE BUE
10ARC EME
8PEN FLO6MUH RIG6PER ABR
2PER ABR
18ESC CAL8PER ABR
50%75%
50%
100%8PEN FLO
9ROS OFF
2ACE FJR
21MUH RIG
2ACE BUE4LAN MON
17MYO PAR12ACA RED23LAV ANG
7BAC PIL
14MUH RIG
17SAL LEU
14LAN MON
14PHO TEN11CIS LAD2TIL SIL
18PEN FLO11MUH RIG8ACA RED8SAL LEU
12ROS OFF
20MUH CAP
5LAN MON
14ARC EME
17MUH RIG11LAV ANG
12LAN MON
10SAL LEU1TIL SIL10PHO TEN16PEN FLO
25%50%
19PLANTING PLANPL-2
www.callanderassociates.com12150 Tributary Point Drive,Suite 140Gold River, CA 95670T 916.985.4366 31KEY MAPEAST STREETKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.Call R
NORTH0 feet201" = 20'40
FOR PLANTING LEGEND, PLANTING NOTES AND PLANTSCHEDULE, SEE SHEET PL-1

PARKING LOT SHADE CALCULATIONS

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.11
SUBJECT: Approve the Plans, Specifications and Bid
Authorization for 2025 Road Maintenance Project,
CIP 25-02

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving the project plans and specifications for the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02 and authorizing the bid advertisement.

Staff Contact:

Diana Ayón, Senior Associate Civil Engineer, (530) 661-5967, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The project is identified in the current Capital Budget as CIP 25-02 with a total budget of $3,185,000.

The project funding is comprised of $3,135,000 in Measure F funding, and $50,000 in Water Enterprise Funds to fund improvements associated with water utility conflicts. This project funding is consistent with the current approved Capital Budget and the Measure F Spending Plan.

The project budget includes the costs for design, project management, construction management/inspection and construction.

There is no impact to the General Fund.

Background:

In November 2016, Woodland voters approved Measure F, which extended the ½ cent supplemental sales tax. The 12-year approval of Measure F, a General Tax, includes funding for general city services including pavement maintenance.

Staff maintains a pavement management program that tracks pavement conditions and aims to address pavement maintenance on local streets with the Measure F funds.

Pavement maintenance is significantly different than pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction which repairs failed roadways. The goal of pavement maintenance is to prevent reactive road repair by proactively preserving and maintaining pavements in fair condition which have not yet deteriorated to the point of needing rehabilitation.

To increase cost efficiency and minimize public inconvenience, pavement maintenance for local/residential streets has historically been completed in discrete ‘zones’ of the city. Geographically bounding projects reduces the cost for construction and traffic control; it also increases the effectiveness of management and inspection. Over 14 years, the city completed pavement maintenance projects in all of the 14 designated zones. With road maintenance having been completed on local roads in all 14 designated zones, staff shifted its focus over the last few years to collector streets in need of preventative maintenance services, including the 2024 Road Maintenance Project.

Discussion:

The current project scope is to provide pavement maintenance on the following corridors:
• Third St (Main St to Gibson Road) – 2” Grind & Overlay • Third St (Main St to Gibson Road) – ADA Improvements
• Granada Drive (Viento Lane to Second St) – ADA Improvements • Hays and Second St Intersection – ADA Improvements

The streets identified for treatment above were chosen because they are at an age and condition which is prime for pavement surface work to preserve their condition and extend their useful life.

Upon Council authorization, project bids will be solicited and staff anticipates returning to Council for contract award in February 2025 for construction to start this summer.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving the project plans and specifications for the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02 and authorizing the bid advertisement.

Prepared by: Diana Ayón, Senior Associate Civil Engineer

Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, Community Development Director/ City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - Plans, Specs, Bid Authorization CIP 25-02

2. Project Map

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2025 ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECT, CIP 25-02; AND AUTHORIZING BID ADVERTISEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Woodland has $3,185,000 of Measure F and Water Enterprise funds identified in the Capital Budget to maintain and extend the life of Woodland's street network, referred to as the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02 (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the funding is consistent with the Capital Budget and the Measure F Spending Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to expend the funds and to construct the Project improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is considered exempt under the Existing Facilities exemption, CEQA Guideline 15301(c).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1.The City Council hereby approves the plans and specifications for the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02, which are available on file with the City Clerk.

SECTION 2.The City Council authorizes City staff to advertise the 2025 Road Maintenance Project, CIP 25-02 for bids, with construction anticipated to begin this summer.

SECTION 3. The City Council finds that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15301(c).

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of December 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

527
522522522522
205
203203
2025 ROAD MAINTENANCE PROJECTPROJECT #25-02Cover Sheet116N/AN/A N/AN/A KAWSRADRA10/28/2024

PROJECT MAP
Diana R. Ayon C7303812/31/26 Brent Meyer - City Engineer10/28/20242/15/2024 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTATE OF CALIFORNIADIANA R. AYONCIVILC73038

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.12
SUBJECT: Approve a Construction Contract for the Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project, CIP 19-
13 Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____ to 1) Appropriate $400,000 in SLIF Roads Funds (Fund 682) to the Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project (CIP 19-13) to cover all project costs; 2) Approve a construction contract for the Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project (CIP 19-13) and award the construction contract in the amount of $1,671,099 to Carone & Company; authorize a contract contingency up to 15% ($250,665); and authorize the City Manager to execute the construction contract and change orders; 3) Approve a professional services agreement for inspection services with UNICO Engineering in the amount of $224,146.79, authorize a contract contingency up to 15% ($33,622), and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and amendments; and 4) Approve an engineering design consultant services contract amendment with Mark Thomas in the amount of $12,800 for a total agreement amount of $404,957.29 and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.

Staff Contact:

Ed Wisniewski, Principal Civil Engineer, (530) 661-5975, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The project is currently funded in the Capital Budget at $2.4 million, consisting of $2,365,000 in Spring Lake Infrastructure – Roads funding (Fund 682) and $35,000 in road development funding (Fund 582). The current action includes the appropriation of $400,000 in additional SLIF funding to cover the total project costs including design, construction, contingency, construction management, inspection, and project management. The total project cost is estimated at $2,800,000.

There is no impact to the General Fund.

Background:

The project consists of realigning the northbound SR-113 off-ramp at Gibson Road by removing the free right turn ramp and aligning the off-ramp movement to utilize the traffic signal. A new pedestrian crosswalk will be added on the east leg of the intersection and the existing traffic signal and lighting system will be modified for the changes at the intersection. Other project improvements include widening over the existing drainage ditch between SR 113 and Harry Lorenzo Avenue to construct a new curb & gutter, a 10-foot-wide planter strip, a 10-foot-wide multi-use pathway, and a 15-foot-wide landscape buffer behind the new sidewalk. New pedestrian-scale streetlights along Gibson Road are also included with the design.

The proposed project will provide operational benefits for all travel modes on the northbound SR-113 Off-Ramp at Gibson Road and provide improved pedestrian connectivity along the south side of Gibson Road. In addition, the Proposed Project will improve the level of service, eliminate projected back-ups onto Northbound SR-113, and reduce Vehicle Hours of Delay, Total Stops and Fuel Consumption / Emissions.

Discussion:

On November 5, 2024, the City Council approved the project plans and specifications and authorized bid advertisement. The project was advertised for bids on November 8, 2024. On December 5, 2024, the City received 8 bids for the Project in the amounts tabulated below:

CONTRACTOR BASE BID
1 Carone & Company $1,671,099.00
2 Argonaut Constructors $1,798,179.20
3 Lund Construction $2,074,573.80
4 R&R Pacific Construction $2,194,194.00
5 Lister Construction $2,277,390.50
6 Mountain Cascade $2,304,118.75
7 JPB Designs $2,417,185.00*
8 Western Engineering Contractors $2,454,508.00
*Bids adjusted due to minor tabulation errors

All bids came in under the engineer’s estimate of $2.54 million. Staff has performed due diligence in reviewing the bids. Carone & Company, Inc. has been determined to be the lowest responsible bidder providing a responsive bid and has complied with all technical submittal requirements. Staff requests that Council award the construction contract for the base bid amount of $1,671,099 and authorize a 15% contingency ($250,566) should any unforeseen conditions arise.

To provide adequate inspection and materials testing in compliance with Caltrans mandated quality assurance requirements for the project, staff is requesting that Council approve a consultant services agreement with Unico Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $224,146.79. Staff requests that Council approve a 15% contingency for the consultant contract to account for any unforeseen services that may be required to meet the requirements of the Caltrans encroachment permit. City staff will provide construction management for the project.

Staff also requests that Council approve an amendment to the consultant service agreement with Mark Thomas in the amount of $12,800, for a total contract of $404,957.29. The amendment will cover continued engineering design support services during construction to address any conflicts discovered during construction and to expedite project completion. Construction support tasks also include responding to contractor’s questions and providing clarifications during construction. Budget for these tasks was previously reallocated within the contract to cover additional requirements in the Caltrans approval process, and needs to be added back in.

Once the contract documents are fully executed and the contractor provides the necessary bonds and proof of insurance, staff will engage with the contractor to initiate procurement of long lead time equipment on the critical path schedule for the project. Once the traffic signal equipment is ordered, there will likely be a period of inactivity until the equipment arrives in the summer of 2025. However, staff still anticipate that all improvements can be completed by fall of 2025.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____ to 1) Appropriate $400,000 in SLIF Roads Funds (Fund 682) to the Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project (CIP 19-13) to cover all project costs; 2) Approve a construction contract for the Gibson Road at SR-113

Interchange Modification Project (CIP 19-13) and award the construction contract in the amount of $1,671,099 to Carone & Company; authorize a contract contingency up to 15% ($250,665); and authorize the City Manager to execute the construction contract and change orders; 3) Approve a professional services agreement for inspection services with UNICO Engineering in the amount of $224,146.79, authorize a contract contingency up to 15% ($33,622), and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and amendments; and 4) Approve an engineering design consultant services contract amendment with Mark Thomas in the amount of $12,800 for a total agreement amount of $404,957.29 and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.

Prepared by: Ed Wisniewski, Principal Civil Engineer

Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, Community Development Director / City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - Award Construction Contract_Carone & Co, CIP 19-13

2. UNICO Proposal (Inspection)

3. Mark Thomas Contract Amendment

4. Project Layout

5. Conceptual Landscape Exhibit

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS,

CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR INSPECTION, AND DESIGN CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOR THE GIBSON ROAD AT SR-113 INTERCHANGE
MODIFICATION PROJECT, CIP 19-13
WHEREAS, the Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project (CIP #19-13) (“Project”) is identified in the current capital budget; and WHEREAS, the Project will reconfigure the northbound SR-113 off-ramp at East Gibson Road by removing the free right turn ramp and realigning the off-ramp movement to utilize the traffic signal; and
WHEREAS, the Project was determined to be exempt from detailed CEQA review pursuant to Section 15310(c) of the CEQA Guidelines (Existing Facilities – Highways & Streets) and a Notice of Exemption was certified in December 2022; and WHERAS, on July 7, 2024 Caltrans issued an encroachment permit for the City to execute the work identified in the Caltrans-approved project documents; and WHEREAS, the Project is currently funded with $2,365,000 Spring Lake Infrastructure – Roads (Fund 682) funding and $35,000 of Road Development (Fund 582) funding, for a total Project budget of $2,400,000; and
WHEREAS, the total project cost, including design, construction, contingency, construction management, inspection, and project management, is currently estimated at $2,800,000; and
WHEREAS, to make up the current funding shortfall, staff is requesting that $400,000 of additional SLIF Roads Funds (Fund 682) be appropriated to the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Project plans and specifications and authorized bid advertisement on November 5, 2024, and the Project was advertised for bids on November 8, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City opened bids on December 5, 2024, and of the 8 received bids, the lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsive bid was Carone & Company, Inc. (“Carone & Company”) as determined by their base bid in the amount of $1,671,099; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to award the construction contract to Carone & Company in the amount of $1,671,099 and authorize a contingency up to 15%; and WHEREAS, the City desires to have the inspection and materials testing performed by an experienced consultant that was selected through a qualifications based selection process; and

WHEREAS, the City wishes to approve the consultant services agreement for inspection and materials testing services with UNICO Engineering in the amount of $224,146.79 and authorize contingency up to 15%; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to approve a professional services contract amendment with Mark Thomas for $12,800.00 for a total contract amount of $404,957.29, and authorize its execution through the adoption of this Resolution.; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1.The City Council hereby authorizes the appropriation of $400,000 in SLIF Roads Funds (Fund 682) to the Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project, CIP 19-13.

SECTION 2.The City wishes to award the construction contract in the amount of $1,671,099 to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Carone & Company, Inc., and authorize a contract contingency up to 15% ($250,665); The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract and change orders up to 15%, subject to City Attorney approval.

The City Attorney is hereby authorized to make clarifying and conforming changes so long as the total dollar amount authorized herein does not change.

SECTION 3.The City Council hereby approves the professional services agreement for inspection with UNICO Engineering in the amount of $244,146.79. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the agreement and amendments up to 15% of the original contract amount ($33,622), subject to City Attorney approval. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to make clarifying and conforming changes so long as the total dollar amount authorized herein does not change.

SECTION 4.The City Council hereby approves a Contract Amendment with Mark Thomas in the amount of $12,800. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Amendment, subject to City Attorney approval. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to make clarifying and confirming changes so long as the total dollar amount authorized in the Amendment does not change.

SECTION 5. Copies of the Construction Contract, the Professional Services Agreement for Inspection Services, and the Amendment to the Design Services Contract are available and on file in the City Clerk’s office and are incorporated herein by reference and made part of this Resolution.

PASSED APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of December 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

80 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 250
Folsom, CA 95630
www.unicoengineering.com • 916.900.6623

Client Focused • Quality Driven

12/11/24

Ed Wisniewski
Principal Civil Engineer
City of Woodland
300 First Street
Woodland, CA 95695

Subject: Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project – CIP #19-13

Dear Mr. Wisniewski,

Thank you for the opportunity to provide a proposal for the above referenced project. The attached proposal outlines the specific work effort required to meet the goals of your project as we understand them.

As the President of UNICO, I am the individual authorized to bind the company into a contract with the City of Woodland and can be at 530.903.9023 or via email at [email protected] with any questions. For questions or clarifications regarding the contents of this proposal, please contact Resident Engineer, Justyn Webster at 916.850.9437 or via email at [email protected]. UNICO looks forward to delivering another key project for the City Sincerely,
UNICO Engineering, Inc.

Cesar Montes de Oca, PE
President

Client Focused • Quality Driven Page | 1

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this proposal for office engineering and inspection services for the Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project. UNICO understands that the project will eliminate the free right turn at the Northbound 113 off-ramp at Gibson Road and install a signalized intersection to turn right. It will also enhance bicycle and pedestrian mobility by providing a controlled north/south crosswalk at the intersection.

The project consists of a new signalized intersection, staged construction, extensive Caltrans coordination, irrigation and planting, sidewalk improvements, drainage improvements, HMA, and signing and striping.

It is UNICO’s understanding that the City will be performing the role of Resident Engineer for this project.

The following proposal outlines the work effort required to complete this project.

A. OFFICE ENGINEER $19,246.15 UNICO will provide part-time Office Engineer (OE) services for 100 working days as well as project start up and close out tasks. The OE will help manage and maintain project files in accordance with Caltrans LAPM standards. This includes coordination with the City, Caltrans, 3rd party utilities, the Contractor, and other stakeholders as needed.

Deliverables: Support Maintaining the Project Files

B. CIVIL INSPECTION $180,501.39
UNICO will provide full time Civil Inspection services for 100 working days as well as project start up and close out tasks.

This includes all coordination with City of Woodland Staff and with the Contractor.

Deliverables: Daily Inspection Reports
Review of Materials Delivered Prior to Installation for Compliance with Contract Documents Pre, During, and Post Photo and Video Documentation
Monthly Quantity Inspection and Measurement for Progress Payments Generate Punchlist

C. MATERIALS TESTING $24,399.25

Client Focused • Quality Driven Page | 2
UNICO’s teaming partner, Geocon, will provide materials testing services as needed for the project.

Deliverables: Daily Field Reports
Testing Results
Testing Logs

LUMP SUM NOT TO EXCEED FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
A. OFFICE ENGINEER .......................................................................................................................... $19,246.15 B. CIVIL INSPECTION ........................................................................................................................ $180,501.39 C. MATERIALS TESTING ..................................................................................................................... $24,399.25

TOTAL ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... $224,146.79

A cost breakdown of is attached.

ASSUMPTIONS AND CLARIFICATION

1. Site will be accessible by vehicle

2. Proposal is based on 100 working days. Working days are defined as non-weekend and non-holiday days

3. Proposal is based upon 8-hour workdays and 40-hour work week. 100 hours of inspection overtime is included in this proposal.

80 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 250
Folsom, CA 95630
916-900-6623
Staff
Resident Engineer
Staff
Assistant Resident Engineer/
Office Engineer
Staff
Construction Inspector
Staff
Construction Inspector (OT)
Jeremy Zorne - Principle
Engineer
Staff
Senior Engineer
Staff
Project Engineer / Geologist
Senioe Staff
Engineer / Geologist
Field Technician
(PW Group 4)
Field Technician
(PW Group 3)
Field Technician
(PW Group 3 OT)
Engineering Assistant
Direct Labor Rate $100.00 $70.00 $65.00 $97.50 $75.00 $65.00 $50.00 $45.00 $4 5.59 $51.56 $77.34 $35.00 Overhead Rate
Fee
Bill Rate $274.95 $192.46 $178.71 $268.07 $226.93 $196.68 $151.29 $1 36.16 $137.94 $156.01 $234.01 $105.90 Task # Task Description Total
1 Pre-Construction 40 7,148.57 $
2 Construction Management and Inspection 100 800 100 189,024.69 $ 3 Post-Construction 20 3,574.29 $
5 Materials Testing 2 2 4 8 12 72 10 5 18,299.25 $
6 Public Outreach (Optional) -$
7 Environmental Oversight Services (Optional) -$
218,046.79 $
0 100 860 100 2 2 4 8 12 72 10 5
6,100.00 $
$ 6,100.00
224,146.79 $
City of Woodland
Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project - CIP #19-13 Cost Proposal
149.95%
10%
UNICO Engineering
175.07%
10%
Geocon
Other Direct Costs
Total
Hours
Geocon - Lab Testing
12/11/2024

Proposal Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project CONSULTANT: Geocon Consultants, Inc. Date: 12/6/2024
Task: Materials Testing Services

DIRECT LABOR
Classification Name Range Hours
Initial Hourly
Rate Total
Principal Engineer Zorne $60 - $80 2 75.00$ 150.00$ Senior Engineer Staff $40 - $70 2 65.00$ 130.00$ Sr. Project Engineer/Geologist Staff $35 - $45 0 55.00$ -$ Project Engineer/Geologist Staff $35 - $45 4 50.00$ 200.00$ Sr. Staff Engineer/Geologist Staff $25 - $35 8 45.00$ 360.00$ Field Technician (PW Group 4) Staff Published PW* 12 45.59$ 547.08$ Field Technician (PW Group 3) Staff Published PW* 72 51.56$ 3,712.32$ Field Technician (PW Group 3) OT Staff Published PW* 10 77.34$ 773.40$ Engineering Assistant Staff $25 - $45 5 35.00$ 175.00$ 115
*Prevailing Wage Determination: NC-63-3-9-2024-1; issue date: 8/22/2024 Subtotal Direct Labor Costs 6,047.80$
Anticipated Salary Increases -$
TOTAL - Direct Labor 6,047.80$
Rate
Fringe Benefit 51.79% 3,132.16$
TOTAL - Fringe Benefits 3,132.16$
Indirect Costs Rate Total
Overhead Rate (General and Administrative) 123.28% 7,455.73$ TOTAL - Indirect Costs 7,455.73$
FEE ( 10.00% ) TOTAL - Fee 1,663.57$
OTHER COSTS (ACTUAL COSTS) Quantity Unit Rate Total
• Laboratory Tests - Soil, AB 1 est $2,710 2,710.00$
• Laboratory Tests - HMA / RHMA 1 est $2,380 2,380.00$
• Laboratory Tests - Concrete 1 est $1,010 1,010.00$
TOTAL - Other Costs 6,100.00$
Total - Geocon Consultants, Inc. 24,399.25$

SUBCONSULTANT COSTS
• n/a -$
TOTAL - Subconsultants -$
TOTAL COST - NOT TO EXCEED 24,399.25$

GEOCON COST PROPOSAL
Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project
Woodland, CA

Project Name Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project Geocon Proposal No. SA-24-2322-P-MT
Federal Aid Project No. n/a
Project Scope
City Project No. CIP# 19-13
Engineer's Estimate: $2,900,000
Schedule:

Assumptions:

Geocon Fee Schedule Geocon FY 2023 Indirect Cost Rates
Labor/Service Activity No. of
Visits
Units per
Visit UNITS QTY RATE AMOUNT
Field Technician (PW - Group 3) Storm Drain (20 LF) 2 8 hrs 16 156.01$ 2,496.14$ Field Technician (PW - Group 3) Subgrade/AB 5 8 hrs 40 156.01$ 6,240.35$ Field Technician (PW - Group 3) HMA Paving 2 8 hrs 16 156.01$ 2,496.14$ Field Technician (PW - Group 3) OT Allowance hrs 10 234.01$ 2,340.13$ Laboratory Soil/AB Lab Testing (see attached detail) Est 1 2,710.00$ 2,710.00$ Laboratory Hot Mix Asphalt Lab Testing (see attached detail) Est 1 2,380.00$ 2,380.00$ Subtotal: 18,662.76$
Field Technician (PW - Group 4) Concrete Sampling 2 6 hrs 12 137.94$ 1,655.34$ Laboratory Structural Concrete Lab Testing est 1 1,010.00$ 1,010.00$ Subtotal: 2,665.34$
Engineering Assistant Dispatch, Coordination hrs 4 105.90$ 423.61$ Sr. Staff Engineer DFR Review, Submittals hrs 8 136.16$ 1,089.28$ Project Engineer Field Report Review, Consultation hrs 4 151.29$ 605.15$ Senior Engineer Geotechnical Consultation hrs 2 196.68$ 393.35$ Principal Engineer QA Review/Consultation/Contract Management hrs 2 226.93$ 453.87$ Engineering Assistant Admin/WP hrs 1 105.90$ 105.90$ Subtotal: 3,071.16$
ESTIMATED TOTAL: 24,399.25$
Approx. Percentage of Construction Cost: 0.8%
Proj. Mgmt. / Coordination / Admin / Meetings / Reporting

FEE ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
QA Materials Testing Services during Construction
100 Working Days
Normal working hours Monday through Friday, prevailing wage Caltrans Test Methods for Earthwork, Subgrade, AB, Concrete Storm Drain, Subgrade, AB, HMA, RHMA
Concrete (Light Pole Fdn, minor concrete)
12/5/2024 Page 2 of 3

Project Name Gibson Road at SR-113 Interchange Modification Project Scope: QA Materials Testing Services during Construction Geocon Proposal No. SA-24-2322-P-MT
Fed Aid Proj. No. n/a
Soil, AB Testing
Test Material Tested Test Name Test Frequency Number of Tests Unit Cost Total
CAL 216 Subgrade Soil Cal Impact Curve As needed, per Test Procedure 6 $250 $1,500 CAL 216 3/4" Class 2 AB Cal Impact Curve As needed, per Test Procedure 2 $250 $500 CAL 202 3/4" Class 2 AB Gradation 1 each 2,000 CY 1 $125 $125 CAL 301 3/4" Class 2 AB R-Value 1 each 2,000 CY 1 $320 $320 CAL 217 3/4" Class 2 AB Sand Equivalent 1 each 2,000 CY 1 $100 $100 CAL 229 3/4" Class 2 AB Durability Index 1 each 2,000 CY 1 $165 $165 Subtotal $2,710
Concrete
Test Material Tested Test Name Test Frequency Number of Tests Unit Cost Total
CAL 217 Concrete Aggregate Sand Equivalent Per QAP 1 $100 $100 CAL 202 Concrete Aggregate Gradation Per QAP 1 $125 $125 CAL 216 Concrete Aggregate Cleanness Value Per QAP 1 $265 $265 CAL 202 Concrete Aggregate LA Abrasion Per QAP 1 $260 $260 CAL 213 Concrete Aggregate Organic Impurities Per QAP 1 $100 $100 CAL 521 Concrete Cylinders Compressive Strength 1 set of 5 cyl per 150 CY 5 $32 $160 Subtotal $1,010
Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) - 410 Tons, RHMA - 65 Tons
Test Material Tested Test Name Test Frequency Number of Tests Unit Cost Total
CT 202 HMA (Field Sample) Extraction/Gradation 1 each 1,000 tons 2 $220 $440 CT 382 Aggregate + Oil Ignition Oven Calibration 1 per Mix or Project 2 $400 $800 CT 382 HMA (Field Sample) Oil Content 1 each 1,000 tons 2 $140 $280 T324 HMA (Field Sample) Hamburg Wheel Track 1 per Mix or Project 0 $1,000 $0 T269 HMA (Field Sample) Air Voids 1 per Mix or Project 0 $525 $0 T283 HMA (Field Sample) Tensile Strength Ratio / Moist. Susceptibility1 per Mix or Project 0 $1,000 $0 CT 309 HMA (Field Sample) Theo. Max. Density (Rice) 1 each day HMA paving 2 $180 $360 CT 202 HMA Aggregate Gradation (Combined) 1 set of 4 per Mix or Project 0 $125 $0 CT 211 HMA Aggregate Los Angeles Rattler (100, 500 revs)1 per Mix or Project 0 $260 $0 CT 205 HMA Aggregate % Crushed Particles (Coarse) 1 per Mix or Project 0 $190 $0 CT 205 HMA Aggregate % Crushed Particles (Fine) 1 per Mix or Project 0 $190 $0 CT 234 HMA Aggregate Fine Aggregate Angularity 1 per Mix or Project 0 $220 $0 CT 235 HMA Aggregate Flat/Elongated Particles 1 per Mix or Project 0 $230 $0 CT 217 HMA Aggregate Sand Equivalent 1 per 1000 tons 0 $100 $0 LP-2 HMA (Field Sample) VMA - Calculation 1 per Project 0 $95 $0 LP-3 HMA (Field Sample) VFA - Calculation 1 per Project 0 $95 $0 Misc HMA (Field Sample) Misc Tests (as needed) As needed 1 $500 $500 Subtotal $2,380

LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM DETAIL

December 11, 2024 File No: SA-20136

Community Development
City of Woodland
300 First Street
Woodland, CA 95695
Attn: Ed Wisniewski
RE: Gibson Road and SR 113 Interchange Modification [CIP #19-13] – Amendment for Construction Support and Record Drawings– Amendment No. 6

Dear Mr. Wisniewski,
Mark Thomas’ scope of services for the Gibson Road and SR 113 Interchange Modification Project includes engineering and design services for project management, surveying and mapping, traffic analysis, environmental services, preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E), construction support, and support for obtaining a Caltrans Encroachment Permit. To date, we have completed preparation of 100% PS&E, traffic analysis, encroachment permit, geotechnical services, and environmental services for the City to clear the project under CEQA. The project was advertised, and the construction contract will be awarded by the City in December 2024.

Contract amendment (CA #5) was approved to include reallocation of the project budgets from Construction Support task to support additional efforts that were needed to finalize contract documents and obtain Caltrans approval. As a result, we have expended our budget for Construction Support task. We are requesting an amendment to our contract to restore the budget for Construction Support task.

As part of this request for Contract Amendment No. 6 (CA #6), Mark Thomas will complete the following tasks:

TASK 6 Construction Support

6.2 Construction Support
This task assumes that the City will perform the construction management in‐house with qualifications that include past experience with public works projects. The construction manager will be responsible for managing the project through construction including overseeing the Contractor and day‐to‐day construction activities and inspection.

During the construction phase, Mark Thomas will work with the Resident Engineer (RE) that is provided by the City to assist and advise the RE in order to minimize construction conflicts and to expedite project completion.

Mark Thomas will prepare Contract Change Order (CCO) plans, respond to Request for Information (RFIs) and review shop drawings, if necessary. For this scope of work, a budget has been specified. After the budget is exhausted, the assistance will be on a time and materials basis.

This task includes all the project managements tasks, such as communication with the City and subconsultants, maintaining project files, coordination meetings, as well as monthly progress reports and invoicing.

CITY OF WOODLAND
GIBSON ROAD AND SR 113 INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS
CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT AND RECORD DRAWINGS–NO. 6

2 OF 2

6.3 Record Drawings
Mark Thomas will provide Record Drawings to the City after construction is complete. These drawings will be based on red‐lined as‐builts provided by the City Construction Manager or City Contractor.

COMPENSATION
Based on the attached Fee Proposal, the total contract budget will be increased by $12,800.00 from $392,157.29. to $404,957.29. Budgets for construction support tasks may be redistributed as needed. Invoices will be submitted monthly on a time and materials basis.

EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS
Thank you again for the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 215-2981.

Sincerely,

MARK THOMAS

Dan Blomquist
Project Manager

Attachments

Sr. Project Manager
Sr. Project Engineer
Design Engineer II
Technician
LAUD Project
Manager
Landscape Designer II
Project Accountant
Sr. Project
Coordinator
$330 $255 $180 $115 $245 $155 $160 $185

6.0 6.2 Construction Support 4 8 18 4 4 38 $7,980

6.3 Record Drawings 4 18 2 8 32 $4,820
Subtotal Phase 6 4 12 18 18 2 8 4 4 70 $12,800
TOTAL HOURS 4 12 18 18 2 8 4 4 70
TOTAL COST $1,320 $3,060 $3,240 $2,070 $490 $1,240 $640 $740 $12,800.00

TOTAL COST
COST PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT SCOPE - Woodland: Gibson Rd/SR-113 Interchange Mod- Mark Thomas
Total
Hours
*Please note that rates shown are for estimating purpose only. See Rate Schedule for actual rates/ranges.

MT Fee (A-1)
Please note that the rates shown are f or estimating p urposes only. See rate schedule for actu al rates/ranges. 12/11/2024

Engineering Surveying
Intern $65 - $110 Survey Technician I-III $65 - $185
Technician $95 - $135 Lead Survey Technician $145 - $165 Design Engineer I $125 - $175 Survey Specialist I-III $135 - $280 Design Engineer II $140 - $220 Asst Surveyor I-III $140 - $200 Sr. Technician $160 - $215 Project Surveyor I-III $200 - $305 Civil Engineering Designer $170 - $260 * Chief of Party $205 - $255 Project Engineer $170 - $240 * Instrumentperson $205 - $230 Sr. Project Engineer $210 - $300 * Chainperson $205 - $215 Sr. Technical Engineer $220 - $245 * Apprentice $130 - $185 Technical Lead $245 - $300 * 2-Person Crew $375 - $455
Sr. Technical Lead $285 - $355 * 3-Person Crew $570 - $675 Design Manager $365 - $405 * Utility Locator $190 - $250 Engineering Manager $365 - $405 Drone $275
Sr. Engineering Manager $370 - $495
Project Management & Oversight
Construction Management Project Manager $250 - $335
Office Engineer $170 - $270 Sr. Project Manager $280 - $380 * Asst. Resident Engineer $240 - $270 Survey Manager I-II $240 - $410 * Inspector - CM $195 - $275 SUE Program Manager $285 - $315 Resident Engineer $310 - $345 Division Manager $290 - $420 Sr. Resident Engineer $350 - $385 Principal $480 - $520 Area Manager - CM $270 - $305
Project Support
Planning Technical/Sr. Technical Writer $120 - $160
Planner I $110 - $140 Project/Sr. Project Assistant $85 - $175 Planner II $155 - $175 Project/Sr. Project Coordinator $130 - $215 Sr. Planner $170 - $235 Graphic/Sr. Graphic Designer $135 - $235 Project Accountant $125 - $195
Landscape Architecture/Urban Design Sr. Graphic Manager $215 - $275 Landscape Intern $90 - $105 Project Accountant Manager $225 - $255 Landscape Designer I $115 - $130
Landscape Designer II $135 - $170 District Management
Landscape Architect $160 - $195 * Inspector - Apprentice $95 - $110 Sr. Landscape Architect $185 - $210 * Inspector/Sr. Inspector $110 - $195 Assistant/Associate Sanitary Engineer $160 - $235
Grant Writing Sanitary/Sr. Sanitary Project Engineer $210 - $300 Funding Specialist $140 - $255 Operations/Deputy District Manager $270 - $385 Sr. Funding Specialist $260 - $305 District Manager-Engineer $395 - $440 Funding Manager $335 - $390
Special Services
Expert Witness $520
Strategic Consulting $520
MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. RATE SCHEDULE
EXPIRES JUNE 30, 2025
Reimbursables including, but not limited to; reproductions, delivery and filing fees; outside consultant fees; and survey field expenses will be billed at Cost Plus 5% . Mileage will be billed per current IRS Rate.

Additional promotional steps exist within various rate categories.

This rate schedule expires June 30, 2025; rates are subject to escalation with new hourly rate schedule as of July 1, 2025. * These charge rates are subject to Prevailing Wage laws and Union contract.

RATE SCHEDULE (A-1) | PAGE 1 OF 1

Graphic Scale

WOODLAND GIBSON ROAD SR-113 IC LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
GIBSON ROAD, WOODLAND, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2020
60'30'15'0'
N

LOW GROUNDCOVER TO KEEP

SIGHT TRIANGLE CLEAR

LOW GROUNDCOVER TO KEEP

SIGHT TRIANGLE CLEAR

EXISTING STORM

DRAIN TO REMAIN

GIBSON ROAD
SR 113 OFF RAMP

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

HARRY LORENZO AVE

ACCENT LOW

GROUNDCOVER

FLOWERING LOW

GROUNDCOVER

SIDEWALK
Chinese Pistache
Pistacia chinesis

PRIMARY STREET TREES

LARGE ACCENT SHRUBS SHRUBS AND GRASSES GROUNDCOVER

SCREEN OR ALTERNATE TREES ACCENT TREES
Valley Oak
Quercus lobata
Japanese Zelkova
Zelkova serrata
Deodar Cedar
Cedrus deodara
Blue Hibiscus
Alyogyne huegelii
Prairiefire Flowering
Crabapple
Malus floribunda
‘Prairiefire’
Pink Crape Mrytle
Lagerstroemia
indica ‘Tuscarora’
Olive Tree
Olea europaea
Bush Anemone
Carpenteria
californica
Pink Rockrose
Cistus x skanbergii
Platinum Beauty
Lomandra
Lomandra longifolia
Santa Barbara
Mexican Bush Sage
Salvia leucantha
‘Santa Barbara’
Coastal Rosemary
Westeringia
fruticosa
Emerald Carpet
Manzanita
Arctostaphylos
‘Emerald Carpet’
Blonde Ambition
Blue Grama
Bouteloua gracilis
‘Blonde Ambition’
Berkeley Sedge
Carex tumulicola
Yankee Point
Ceanothus
Ceanothus griseus
‘Yankee Point’

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.13
SUBJECT: Approve a Professional Services Contract for the East Main Pump Station Generator Rehabilitation
Project, CIP #22-02

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving a professional services contract with West Yost for pre-design services in the amount of $118,006.

Staff Contact:

Dang Bui, Associate Engineer, (530) 661-5856, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The overall project budget for the Storm Drainage Pump Station Emergency Generator Rehabilitation Project, CIP #22-02, is $310,000 from the 221 Storm Drain Enterprise Fund.

The Storm Drainage Pump Station Emergency Generator Rehabilitation Project is currently in the pre-design phase and City staff expects to come back to the Council at a later date to award the professional services contract for design of the project. The associated professional services contract for the pre-design phase is for an amount of $118,006. Other items that make up the total project budget represent the amount allocated for design, construction, and contingency costs.

There is no impact to the General Fund.

Background:

The City is continually reviewing the status of its stormwater system. In reviewing the stormwater system, City staff has identified that the generators at the East Main Pump Station (EMPS) and North Canal Pump Station (NCPS) need to be replaced, as they have reached the end of their useful life.

One of the generators is no longer operational, and the other is difficult to repair due to the scarcity of replacement parts. In May 2022, City Council approved the creation of CIP 22-02 — The EMPS Emergency Generator Rehabilitation Project. The project evaluated the generators at EMPS and NCPS to assess ongoing reliability and any needed rehabilitation. The evaluation recommended replacement of both generators. EMPS was prioritized due to the increased difficulty of starting the generator. However, the replacement of the generator also entailed raising it above the 100-year flood elevation.

On the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) 100-year flood map, the City’s EMPS, located at 2395 E. Main Street and the City’s North Canal Pump Station (NCPS), located adjacent at 3295 E. Main Street are within the flood boundaries. A “100-year” flood has a 1/100 chance of occurring in any given year. Given the flat topography of the City, all stormwater is pumped from the storm drainage system into the Outfall Channel in order for the City to drain. As such, the EMPS and NCPS are critical facilities in preventing significant flooding within the City from local storms. In the interim, the replacement of the EMPS generator was put on hold until the City secured the funds to raise the new generator above the flood elevation. Both generators and associated electrical components are several feet below the 100-year flood elevation and the replacement generators and electrical components will need to be protected from flooding.

The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Trash Amendment Policy requires communities to remove trash from storm water prior to leaving the community’s storm drainage system. To remain in compliance, a finer screen will be required to prevent any material larger than 5 mm from passing downstream. This change has prompted the City to reassess the site at the EMPS and NCPS for other deficiencies such as flood protection and infrastructure maintenance, especially for the NCPS.

During a recent inspection, City staff determined that minimal work is needed at EMPS, apart from replacing the generator and raising its elevation to meet flood requirements. However, the situation at NCPS is more complex. The pumps have reached the end of their useful life, and the corrosion of the two pipes has worsened since October 2021, when City staff observed a significant leak in one pipe and a failing mechanical coupler in the other with a large section of pipe at its failure point. The condition of the submerged portion of the pipes remains uncertain, requiring further investigation before the design phase. Failure of both pipes at NCPS would prevent the City from pumping stormwater out of the northern portion of the City. A separate project is planning to install a liner in the discharge pipes allow for continued use of the NCPS.

Discussion:

All the City’s stormwater drains to a single outfall (Outfall Channel) located just east of the City limits on E. Main Street. The City operates three stormwater pump stations at this location: the South Canal Pump Station (SCPS), which handles stormwater from the southeast portion of the City; the EMPS, which serves the central portion; and the NCPS, which manages stormwater from the northern area.

The Lower Cache Creek Flood Risk Reduction Project would have provided a portion of the funding for the NCPS work and would have avoided the need and costs to elevate the electrical components and generators. Given the failure of the ballot measure M and stopping work on flood protection work and the urgent need to address the failing NCPS, the work on the NCPS needs to be advanced separately from a coordinated project on flood protection.

An issue with one of the three stormwater pump stations, such as a lack of flood protection or infrastructure reaching the end of their useful life, would adversely affect the City’s drainage.

Additionally, trash collection measures are needed to comply with the current SWRCB Trash Amendment Policy.

While an evaluation of the EMPS generator and electrical components was conducted in 2022, City staff believe it is prudent to reassess the site for other deficiencies during the pre-design phase to ensure the pump stations comply with current regulations and are constructed above the flood elevation.

Given these challenges, exploring potential alternatives for addressing the deficiencies at NCPS and EMPS under this pre-design contract would be more efficient since they share the same site. This approach will provide the necessary information for the City to seek additional funding for construction work on both pump stations. To this end, City staff is engaging the professional services of West Yost during the pre-design phase.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, approving a professional services contract with West Yost for pre-design services in the amount of $118,006.

Prepared by: Dang Bui, Associate Engineer

Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, Community Development Director / City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - Professional Services Contract West Yost, CIP 22-02

2. Exhibit - Site Map

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH WEST YOST

ASSOCIATES, INC TO PROVIDE PRE-DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE EAST MAIN

PUMP STATION GENERATOR REHABILITATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to enter into a professional services agreement with West Yost Associates, Inc. (West Yost) for an amount of up to $118,006.00; and WHEREAS, West Yost has been selected through a quality based selection process; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to approve the amendment and authorize its execution through the adoption of this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1.The City Council hereby approves the professional services contract with West Yost in the amount of $118,006. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the contract, subject to City Attorney approval. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to make clarifying and confirm changes so long as the total dollar amount authorized herein does not change.

SECTION 2.Copies of the Professional Service Contract for the Conceptual Design and Cost Estimate Services are available and on file in the City Clerk’s office and are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of December 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ _____________________________ Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

Legend
Aerial Imagery with Labels - 2024
Red: Red
Green: Green
Blue: Blue
Notes
0 100 200 ft

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.14
SUBJECT: Approve a Professional Services Agreement with BSK Associates for 2025 Water Quality Testing
Services

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, authorizing the City Manager to execute the contract with BSK Associates for the 2025 Water Quality Testing Services, for an amount up to $148,861.50 and authorize a contingency of up to 10% ($14,886.15).

Staff Contact:

Tim Busch, Principal Utilities Civil Engineer, (530) 661-5963, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The funding source for the annual water quality testing is the Water Enterprise Fund. The budget for this work is included under Operation and Maintenance Contract Services for the Water Distribution System. There is no impact on the General Fund.

Background:

The City’s water system primarily utilizes treated Sacramento River water from the Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency (WDCWA) Regional Water Treatment Facility (RWTF). Water supplied by WDCWA is supplemented by several wells, including three (3) aquifer storage & recovery (ASR) wells. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Division of Drinking Water (DDW) requires extensive water quality testing including: within the distribution system, at each well (including standby and inactive wells), and the WDCWA compliance points. This testing includes weekly, monthly, quarterly, and annual testing of numerous water quality constituents.

Discussion:

Water quality testing is more extensive in 2025 than in 2024 because it includes triennial sampling for lead and copper, initial monitoring for PFAS, new monitoring for hexavalent chromium, and continued monitoring for ASR wells. The 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act amendments require the EPA to issue a new list of no more than 30 unregulated contaminants once every five years for public water systems to sample. The Unregulated Contaminants Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) was published in the Federal Register in 2021 and requires monitoring for 30 chemical contaminants from January 2023 to December 2025. The selected contaminants include 29 PFAS (perfluoroalkyl substances) and lithium. The City of Woodland began this testing in 2024 and will complete sampling in 2025.

In April 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency issued the first national drinking water regulations to limit PFAS in drinking water. The rule establishes Maximum Contaminant Levels for 6 PFAS and requires water systems to perform initial monitoring by 2027. The City of Woodland scheduled this testing for 2025, and it includes quarterly sampling at all well sources.

Several wells were placed on “standby” or “inactive” status over the past few years, which reduced the amount of testing required. Some of these wells have not been used in the past few years and serve only as an emergency backup supply. Seven wells, including the three aquifer storage & recovery (ASR) wells, are maintained as “active” and can be used at any time for water supply if

needed. The 2025 budget accounts for regulatory monitoring to maintain the wells, some of which occur every three years and are coming due. It also includes ASR well monitoring for management of stored water in the aquifer. The ASR wells are injected with treated surface water, and thus the City must track the influence of groundwater to maintain surface water quality. The 2025 BSK Costs spreadsheet is attached and shows a detailed breakdown of the water quality tests, frequency, and cost.

Every three years, Citywide lead and copper tests are conducted to verify compliance with the Federal EPA’s Lead and Copper Rule. This work will occur in Summer 2025. The 2024 Revised Lead and Copper Rule lowers the action limit for lead from 15 parts per billion (ppb) to 10 ppb.

In September 2022, staff circulated a Request for Qualifications for Water Quality Lab Services. BSK Associates were selected based on professional excellence, demonstrated competence, and experience with similar work. They have also provided water quality sampling service for the City of Woodland since 2005 and WDCWA since 2016. The Request for Qualifications stated the selection would be for a period of five years from January 2023 through December 2027. Each year, a new services agreement is created between the City of Woodland and BSK Associates based on required and anticipated testing services. Testing requirements vary each calendar year. A budget contingency is included to provide a budgetary allowance for unplanned testing. For example, additional testing is required at the ASR Wells each month they are in operation. The current contract expires on December 31, 2024, and a new contract has been created for 2025.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, authorizing the City Manager to execute the contract with BSK Associates for the 2025 Water Quality Testing Services, for an amount up to $148,861.50 and authorize a contingency of up to 10% ($14,886.15).

Prepared by: Tim Busch, Principal Utilities Civil Engineer

Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, Community Development Director/City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - BSK 2025 Contract

2. Attachment - BSK Costs 2025

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH BSK ASSOCIATES FOR 2025 WATER

QUALITY TESTING SERVICES
WHEREAS, retaining a water quality testing services laboratory is necessary for compliance with the State Water Resources Control Board – Division of Drinking Water regulations; and
WHEREAS, BSK Associates was selected to provide water quality testing services for a period of five years based on the selection process conducted in 2022; and WHEREAS, the budget for funding the water quality testing services is included under Operations and Maintenance Contract Services budget for the Water Distribution System; and WHEREAS, BSK Associates is experienced in water quality testing and has a certified laboratory; and
WHEREAS, the City of Woodland wishes to enter into a 2025 Water Quality Testing Services Agreement with BSK Associates for an amount up to $148,861.50 (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, City Council wishes to approve the 2025 Water Quality Testing Services Agreement with BSK Associates and authorize its execution through the adoption of this resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to approve a contingency of up to 10% ($14,886.15) and authorize its execution through the adoption of this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1.The City Council hereby approves the Agreement between the City and BSK for an amount of $148,861.50 with contingencies up to 10% ($14,886.15). The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreement, subject to City Attorney approval. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to make clarifying and confirming changes so long as the total dollar amount authorized in the Agreement does not change.

SECTION 2.A copy of the Agreement is available and on file in the City Clerk’s office and is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of December 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

Attachment – 2025 BSK Associates Agreement Costs:

Constituents # of Samples Unit Cost Total Cost
Bacteriological & Chlorine Residual 948 34 $ 32,232 Bacteriological (Raw Water) 48 19 $ 912 Orthophosphate (18), Aluminum (25)
(total), Color (22) (apparent),
Turbidity (18)
216 83 $ 17,928 TTHMs 91 75 $ 6,825 HAA5s 84 100 $ 8,400 Chromium VI 28 65 $ 1,820 General Water Quality 41 80 $ 3,280 Nitrate 9 16 $ 144 Nitrite 5 16 $ 80 Asbestos 1 200 $ 200 Title 22 + Externals (include
Thiobencarb + TCD Dioxin) 5 2650 $ 13,250 VOC 2 105 210$
VOC (semi volatile organics) 2 100 200$
SOC 2 1450 2,900$
TCDD Dioxin 2 550 1,100$
1,2,3 TCP 2 100 200$
Radionuclides 2 457.75 915.50$
Lead and Copper 35 35 1,225$
UCMR5 (PFAS: EPA method 533) 4 425 1,700$
UCMR5 (PFAS: EPA method 537.1) 4 325 1,300$
UCMR5 Lithium 4 50 200$
PFAS LC-MS/MS Initial Monitoring 36 275 9,900$
PFAS Short Chain Initial Monitoring 36 375 13,500$
PFAS SC Field Blank Initial Monitoring 36 100 3,600$
ASR List A 30 650 19,500$
ASR List B 18 32 576$
Certification/Disposal Fees 1691 4 6,764$
148,861.50$
2025 Costs

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.15
SUBJECT: Final Acceptance and Notice of Completion for the Spring Lake Recycled Water Project, CIP 17-07

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, accepting the construction contract for the Spring Lake Recycled Water Project, CIP 17-07, with Argonaut Constructors, Inc., as complete and authorizing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.

Staff Contact:

Matt Cohen, Associate Engineer, (530) 661-5973, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The authorized construction contract amount with Argonaut Constructors, Inc., for the Spring Lake Recycled Water Project, CIP 17-07, (hereafter “Project”) is $2,831,717.50 with an approved contingency amount of $424,758. Five change orders have been executed for a total amount of $338,508.90, which results in a total construction contract of $3,170,226.40.

The Project has an authorized total budget of $4,005,000 funded through Water Enterprise Funds.

However, the City executed a funding/financing agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) to reimburse the Water Fund. The funding agreement initially encumbered $2,832,018, consisting of a $550,000 grant component from Prop 68 (Water Recycling) and a $2,282,018 loan at 0.55% interest rate. The SWRCB is currently processing a final budget amendment to increase the CWSRF loan portion to $2,831,718 for a total funding agreement amount of $3,839,463, which will provide nearly full CWSRF funding for the project.

The CWSRF loan payments are covered by recycled water rates within the respective use areas.

Recycled water is provided to certain users in Woodland on a contract basis. The recycled water rate for the Spring Lake Recycled Water Project area is anticipated to be approximately 85% of the potable water irrigation rate for FY25, which will reduce landscape irrigation costs in the Spring Lake area. Recycled water also experiences minimal rate increases over time as the majority of cost is debt repayment.

There is no impact to the General Fund.

Background:

The Spring Lake Recycled Water Project is the second recycled water project in Woodland. It builds off the Industrial Park Recycled Water Project, which established Woodland’s recycled water utility in 2017. The Spring Lake Recycled Water Project represents Phase II of Woodland’s recycled water development, as it included approximately 10,000 linear feet of 8-inch recycled water main, expanding recycled water use on E. Gibson Rd (between CR102 and Harry Lorenzo Ave), Harry Lorenzo Ave (between E. Gibson Rd and Marston Dr), on Marston Dr (between Harry Lorenzo Ave and Miekle Ave), on Parkland Ave (between Marston Dr and CR-25A), and on CR-25A (between Harry Lorenzo Ave and Miekle Ave). All new recycled water use areas will provide recycled water exclusively for irrigation. The project connected existing (but previously unconnected) recycled water mains installed by developers in the Spring Lake area, so the actual total of newly connected pipe is

about 15,000 linear feet. The project adds about 20 new recycled water connections and offsets approximately 200,000 gallons/day (on average) of irrigation water that would otherwise be served from the potable water system, though actual irrigation demand differs seasonally throughout the year. The use of recycled water in the Spring Lake and WRTP (Woodland Research and Technology Park) area is planned to increase to approximately 400,000 gallons/day total, as the Project included a stub for a future WRTP connection and stubs for expansion of irrigation recycled water use in future developments near E. Gibson Rd and Pioneer Ave.

The construction project was completed by Argonaut on December 5th, 2024. A relatively small amount of work remains for City staff and the landscape contractor (Figueroa Landscaping) to connect irrigation system hydrometers, restore landscaping, and replace irrigation box lids.

Discussion:

Five change orders for CIP 17-07 have been executed for a total amount of $338,508.90. The majority of change order costs fell into three main categories: 1) scheduling weekend work for critical sections of construction near Pioneer High School (to avoid traffic disruptions associated with school drop off and pick up), 2) expedited mobilization/paving of the trench near Harry Lorenzo Ave and East Gibson Rd to complete paving in advance of microsurfacing by another City project, and 3) revising the plan to connect to Rick Gonzales Sr Park and the Spring Lake Elementary School Playfields using horizontal directional drilling rather than open cut trenching. Minor change order costs included pressure testing of developer-installed recycled water mains (to ensure no leakage of the entire pipeline, not just the sections Argonaut constructed), slight delays due to unmarked utilities (streetlight wires), and requesting new meter box and recycled water connections that weren’t included in the project plans.

The project cost breakdown is as follows:

Construction $2,831,717.50
Change Orders $338,508.90
Total Construction Cost $3,170,226.40
Design Costs, rounded $325,000
Project/Construction Management, rounded $350,000
Miscellaneous Construction Costs, rounded $50,000
Total Project Costs, rounded $3,900,000

Additional miscellaneous costs were incurred outside of the construction contract, related to engineering design, construction inspection, installation of recycled water “do not drink” signs, purple lids (indicating recycled water) for valve and emitter boxes on the irrigation systems, environmental permitting and compliance, and landscape contractor expenses for re-connection of irrigation system hydrometers.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, accepting the construction contract for the Spring Lake Recycled Water Project, CIP 17-07, with Argonaut Constructors, Inc., as complete and authorizing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.

Prepared by: Matt Cohen, Associate Engineer
Reviewed by: Tim Busch, Principal Utilities Civil Engineer; Brent Meyer, Community Development Director/City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - Acceptance and NOC_Spring Lake Recycled Water Project, CIP 17-07

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND TO ACCEPT THE SPRING LAKE RECYCLED WATER PROJECT, CIP 17-07 CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACT AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION.

WHEREAS, the City Council approved the plans and specifications for the Spring Lake Recycled Water project, CIP 17-07 (the “Project”) and authorized advertisement for bids on November 7, 2023, and the City of Woodland advertised for bids on November 8, 2023; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution 8210 on February 20, 2024, to execute a construction contract with Argonaut Constructors Inc., in the amount of $2,831,717.50 and approved a 15% construction contingency in the amount of $424,758 for the Project with a total project budget of $4,005,000; and
WHEREAS, the construction of the Project began on March 21, 2024 and was completed on December 5, 2024.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1.The City Council hereby accepts the Spring Lake Recycled Water Project (CIP 17-07) as complete.

SECTION 2.The City Council hereby authorizes the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion for the Spring Lake Recycled Water Project, CIP 17-07.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of December 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.16
SUBJECT: Accept the Public Improvements for Subdivision Final Map 5162 and 5206 Pioneer Village Phase 1 and 2
Offsites

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, accepting the Public Improvements For Subdivision Final Map 5162 and 5206, Pioneer Village Phase 1 and 2 (offsite improvements only).

Staff Contact:

Kendall Walker, Engineering Technician - (530) 661-5907, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

The public improvements constructed with these maps add 107,031 square feet of new public landscaping, with an estimated annual maintenance cost of $163,277.78 including maintenance and water use. This additional landscaping is within the boundaries of and will be maintained by the Spring Lake Landscape & Lighting District (L&L). These costs were anticipated during the formation of the L&L and will be included with the proposed annual assessments, which are typically presented to Council in May each year.

The Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement 34 (GASB 34) requires state and local governments to include valuation and depreciation information on public infrastructure assets for accounting purposes and financial reports. The total cost of public infrastructure in the GASB34 categories that the City will acquire with these subdivisions are shown below.

Est. GASB34
category
Pioneer Village Phase 1
Pioneer Avenue
Pioneer Village Phase 1
Gibson/HLA
Intersection
Pioneer Village Phase 2
Farmers Central Rd
Road $2,714,666.99 $1,142,194.00 $701,958.82
Water $263,225.00 N/A $23,680.00
Sewer $15,000.00 N/A N/A
Storm Drain $197,730.00 N/A $15,000.00

Background:

On November 5, 2019, City Council approved the Tentative Map for 5162 Pioneer Village and the Development Agreement. The map consisted of 231 single-family lots and 4.1 acres of multifamily housing.

On May 10, 2022, the City Council approved Final Subdivision Maps (SM) No. 5162 Pioneer Village Phase 1 (111 lots) and 5206 Pioneer Village Phase 2 (120 lots), and the associated Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Lennar Homes of California, LLC. The offsite public improvements to be accepted with this action are those defined in the plan sets listed below:

Improvement Plans City Engineer Approved Date
Civil Improvement Plans for Gibson Road / Harry Lorenzo / Bourn Drive Intersection & Signal Improvements July 8, 2021
Civil Improvement Plans – Spring Lake Specific Plan – Pioneer Avenue Improvements July 8, 2021
Landscape Improvement Plans for Pioneer Avenue July 8, 2021 Civil Improvement Plans for Farmers Central Road Improvements – Harry Lorenzo Avenue to Pioneer Avenue August 26, 2021
Landscape Improvement Plans for Farmers Central Road Subdivision 5162 August 26, 2021

As of November 20, 2024, Lennar Homes of California, LLC, has completed the offsite infrastructure improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, Public Works, and Community Development Departments.

Following Council acceptance, the City Clerk will file a Notice of Completion for the completed items, initiating the release of the developer’s performance and payment securities for these improvements.

The developer has provided warranty security to correct any defects identified during the one-year warranty time frame following the Notice of Completion filing.

Discussion:

This is the standard practice for obtaining infrastructure improvements for new subdivisions. The final map dedicated streets and public utility easements to the City. The work is designed to City Standard Specifications and the improvements are inspected by the City during construction.

This action will accept only the offsite improvements associated with Pioneer Village Phase 1 & 2.

The in-tract improvements associated with Pioneer Village Phase 1 & 2 were accepted by Council on 7/16/2024.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. _____, accepting the Public Improvements For Subdivision Final Map 5162 and 5206, Pioneer Village Phase 1 and 2 (offsite improvements only).

Prepared by: Kendall Walker, Engineering Technician

Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, Community Development Director / City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - SD FM 5162 and 5206 Pioneer Village Phase 1 and 2 Offsites

2. Location Map

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
SUBDIVISION FINAL MAP 5162 AND 5206, PIONEER VILLAGE PHASE 1 AND 2 (OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS ONLY).

WHEREAS, On November 5, 2019, the City Council approved tentative map 5162 and an associated Development Agreement with map conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, has complied with the conditions of approval and has recorded two final maps for 111 (SM-5162, Phase 1) and 120 lots (SM-5206, Phase 2); and
WHEREAS, the conditions of approval for the Map required the subdivider, Lennar Homes of California, to enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement calling for the construction of infrastructure necessary to serve the development permitted by this Map (collectively, the “Improvements”), and furnish bonds or other securities to ensure the timely completion of the Improvements; and
WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California has completed the required Improvements associated with the Phase 1 & Phase 2 offsite improvements plans, and the in-tract improvements were previously accepted by Council; and
WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California has previously furnished bonds for public improvements associated with subdivisions 5162 and 5206, identified as Bond No. ES00008111 issued by Everest Reinsurance Company and Bond No. 024254993 and issued by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, as surety (“Bonds”), securing the completion of the Improvements; and WHEREAS, the Subdivision Map Act and the Woodland Municipal Code require the City to accept subdivision improvements which have been completed; and WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California has requested that the City accept those Improvements that have been completed;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1.The City Council hereby accepts those Improvements constructed for Subdivision 5162 (Pioneer Village Phase 1) as shown on the improvement plans entitled “Civil Improvement Plans for Gibson Road / Harry Lorenzo / Bourn Drive Intersection & Signal Improvements” approved by the City Engineer July 8, 2021.

SECTION 2.The City Council hereby accepts those Improvements constructed for Subdivision 5162 (Pioneer Village Phase 1) as shown on the improvement plans entitled “Civil Improvement Plans – Spring Lake Specific Plan – Pioneer Avenue Improvements” and

“Landscape Improvement Plans for Pioneer Avenue” and approved by the City Engineer July 8, 2021.

SECTION 3.The City Council hereby accepts those Improvements constructed for Subdivision 5162 (Pioneer Village Phase 1) as shown on the improvement plans entitled “Civil Improvement Plans for Farmers Central Road Improvements – Harry Lorenzo Avenue to Pioneer Avenue” and “Landscape Improvement Plans for Farmers Central Road Subdivision 5162” and approved by the City Engineer August 26, 2021.

SECTION 4.The City Council hereby authorizes the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion and release the developer’s faithful performance securities for offsite public improvements associated with Subdivision No. 5162 Pioneer Village Phase 1 and 5206 Pioneer Village Phase 2.

SECTION 5.Through adoption of this resolution, the City of Woodland does not waive any of its rights, or obligations of Lennar Homes of California or any other entity, under the conditions of approval for the Map, any associated development agreement, reimbursement agreement, participation agreement, or under any other document, ordinance or applicable law.

SECTION 6.The adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to cure any breach by Lennar Homes of California or any other entity of its obligations under the Map or any other document, ordinance, or applicable law.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held this 17th day of December 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN
______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

Gibson & HLA/BourneNew Traffic SignalIn-Tract Improvements(Previously Accepted) Farmers Central RoadFrontage Improvements
Pioneer AvenueFrontage Improvements
Farmers Central & PioneerNew Traffic Signal
NSWE

TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA: City Council Regular Meeting
DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM #: F.17
SUBJECT: Approval of Final Map 5221 Ruby Estates
Subdivision, Related Subdivision Improvement
Agreement, and Related Spring Lake Infrastructure
Fee (SLIF) Reimbursement Agreement.

Recommendation for Action: Staff recommends that the City Council 1) Adopt Resolution No. _____, approving Final Map 5221 Ruby Estates Subdivision, approving the related Subdivision Improvement Agreement and authorizing the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City, and authorizing the City Manager to approve amendments to the Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the extension of time; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. _____, approving the SLIF Reimbursement Agreement for infrastructure related to Final Subdivision Map No. 5221 Ruby Estates Subdivision, and authorizing the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City, and authorizing the City Manager to sign amendments up to 15% of the Reimbursement Agreement.

Staff Contact:

Lolly Weichel, (530) 661-5950, [email protected]

Fiscal Impact:

This project's processing costs were covered by fees. In addition, at buildout the 87 lots are estimated to generate approximately $3.1 million in development impact fees. There is no impact to the General Fund.

The SLIF reimbursement agreement does not obligate the City to pay out any additional funds that are generated by means other than the Spring Lake Infrastructure Fee program. The total cost of Spring Lake backbone improvements eligible for reimbursement through the SLIF is currently estimated at $335,120. Final SLIF reimbursement will be at actual cost after project acceptance and review of the developer’s actual cost documentation.

Background:

On July 19, 2022, City Council approved the tentative map 5221 (Ruby Estates) for 87 multi-family lots and a Development Agreement.

The Developer, Lennar Homes of California, LLC, has completed all conditions required for approval of the final map, and is requesting that the City approve Final Subdivision Map (SM) No. 5221 Ruby Estates, and the associated Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Reimbursement Agreement.

Discussion:

The map, improvement plans, and related documents have been reviewed by staff and found to be technically correct and consistent with the tentative map, project development agreement, and conditions of approval.

The project conditions require the continuation of a sound wall and landscaping along County Road 25A (appox. 450 linear feet). These improvements were included in the Spring Lake Capital Infrastructure Plan and are subject to reimbursement through the SLIF. The Developer is requesting execution of the SLIF agreement to reimburse for the work necessary to satisfy the condition of

approval for the completion of the privacy wall and landscaping.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council 1) Adopt Resolution No. _____, approving Final Map 5221 Ruby Estates Subdivision, approving the related Subdivision Improvement Agreement and authorizing the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City, and authorizing the City Manager to approve amendments to the Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the extension of time; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. _____, approving the SLIF Reimbursement Agreement for infrastructure related to Final Subdivision Map No. 5221 Ruby Estates Subdivision, and authorizing the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City, and authorizing the City Manager to sign amendments up to 15% of the Reimbursement Agreement.

Prepared by: Lolly Weichel, Senior Engineering Assistant

Reviewed by: Brent Meyer, Community Development Director / City Engineer

Attachments:

1. Proposed Resolution - Final Map & SIA

2. Proposed Resolution - SLIF Reimbursement Agmt

3. Location Map

4. Final Subdivision Map 5221

5. Subdivision Improvement Agreement

6. SLIF Reimbursement Agreement

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND APPROVING FINAL MAP 5221, AND A SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT

AGREEMENT WITH LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC AND AG EHC II (LEN) CA 2, L.P. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council approved Tentative Map 5221 Ruby Estates Subdivision, and an associated Development Agreement with conditions of approval on July 19, 2022; and WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, LLC has satisfied the conditions of approval and has filed a final map with the City for 87 multi-family lots; and WHEREAS, the City of Woodland has reviewed the map and determined that it is technically correct and that the conditions of approval have been met; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to approve Final Map 5221 Ruby Estates, and the associated Subdivision Improvement Agreement through the adoption of this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1.The City Council hereby approves Final Map 5221 Ruby Estates and directs the City Clerk to sign the map and the City Engineer to forward the map to the Yolo County Tax Collector for processing prior to recording with the Yolo Clerk-Recorder.

SECTION 2.The City Council hereby approves the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to sign the Agreement, and the City Manager is authorized to amend the agreement to grant time extensions to the agreement if necessary.

SECTION 3.A copy of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement is available and on file in the City Clerk’s office, and is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of December 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODLAND

APPROVING THE SLIF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP 5221, RUBY ESTATES
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2022, the City Council approved Tentative Map 5221, Ruby Estates and the related Development Agreement with Conditions of Approval; and WHEREAS, the Developer, Lennar Homes of California, LLC, has satisfied the Conditions of Approval and completed requirements for Subdivision Map 5221, Ruby Estates; and WHEREAS, the Developer, Lennar Homes of California, LLC, completed and entered into to a Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the subdivision and posted the required security; and
WHEREAS, the Developer, Lennar Homes of California, LLC, is requesting the City Council approve a Spring Lake Infrastructure Fee (SLIF) Reimbursement Agreement for Subdivision 5196, and
WHEREAS, the Developer, Lennar Homes of California, LLC, is requesting the City Council approve the final map (by separate resolution) and related agreements for Subdivision 5196.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Woodland as follows:

SECTION 1.Approves the SLIF Reimbursement Agreement with Lennar Homes of California, a California Limited Liability Company and authorizes the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City.

SECTION 2.Authorizes the City Manager to approve modifications to the SLIF Reimbursement Agreement not to exceed $50,000 (approximately 15%).

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Woodland at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of December 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN: ______________________________
Tom Stallard, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Lansburgh, CMC, City Clerk Andreas Booher, City Attorney

RUBY ESTATESSM #5221
NSWE

WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, DO HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF THIS MAP OF "RUBY ESTATES"FOR RECORD; AND WE DO HEREBY STATE THAT IN ORDER TO PASS CLEAR TITLE TO THE LAND DELINEATED WITHINTHE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY OF THIS MAP THE CONSENT OF NO OTHER PERSONS IS NECESSARY.THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS IRREVOCABLY DEDICATED, IN FEE, TO THE CITY OF WOODLAND AMUNICIPAL CORPORATION, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: COUNTY ROAD 25A AND COUNTY ROAD 102.THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS IRREVOCABLY DEDICATED, AS AN EASEMENT, TO THE CITY OFWOODLAND A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF DRAINAGE,WATER, SEWER, GAS PIPES, POWER, LIGHTS , SIGNS, TELEPHONE, COMMUNICATION AND TELEVISION CABLES; ANDANY AND ALL OTHER UTILITY SERVICES TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL NECESSARY APPURTENANCES IN EACH CASE,IN, OVER AND ACROSS LOTS A THROUGH O, TOGETHER WITH THOSE STRIPS OF LAND SHOWN OR DESIGNATED AS"PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT" (P.U.E.).WE HEREBY RESERVE AN EASEMENT FOR RECIPROCAL PRIVATE ACCESS, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES AND MAINTENANCEON, OVER, AND ACROSS LOTS A THROUGH O. THIS EASEMENT SHALL BIND AND INURE TO THE BENEFIT OF THEHEIRS, ADMINISTRATORS, EXECUTORS AND SUCCESSORS OF THE GRANTORS AND ARE FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS ATHROUGH O, SHOWN HEREON.WE DO HEREBY RELINQUISH ALL ABUTTERS RIGHTS TO INGRESS AND EGRESS TO COUNTY ROAD 25A ASDELINEATED HEREON.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE CAUSED THEIR NAMES TO BE SUBSCRIBED ON THIS _________ DAYOF ______________ 2024.

I HEREBY STATE THAT AT ITS REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF ____________________, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF WOODLAND APPROVED THIS FINAL MAP OF "RUBY ESTATES", AND HAS ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLICALL LAND, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS HEREON OFFERED FOR DEDICATION.DATED: _____________ _________________________________________________ANA GONZALEZ, CITY CLERK, CITY OF WOODLANDCITY CLERK'S STATEMENT:FILED THIS _______ DAY OF _________________, 2024, AT __________ IN BOOK _________ OF ___________________,AT PAGE ___________, AT THE REQUEST OF ______________________________________________________ .______________________________________________COUNTY RECORDER - COUNTY OF YOLO______________________________________________BY:

I, THE UNDERSIGNED, TAX COLLECTOR AND REDEMPTION OFFICER OF YOLO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,DO HEREBY STATE THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THISPROPERTY NOR ANY PART THEREOF FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL TAXES, OR SPECIALASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS NOT YET PAYABLE.FURTHERMORE, PURSUANT TO THE YOLO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' RESOLUTION NO. 89-168, I DOHEREBY CERTIFY ON BEHALF OF THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS THAT CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 8,OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT HAS BEEN COMPLIED WITH REGARDING DEPOSITS.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE UNDERSIGNED HAS CAUSED THEIR NAME TO BE SUBSCRIBED ON THIS __________,DAY OF ________________________, 2024._____________________________________________________TOM HAYNES, TAX COLLECTORBY __________________________________________________ DEPUTYRECORDER'S STATEMENT:

COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR'S STATEMENT:

THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITHTHE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF RUBY REALTYINVESTORS, LLC ON NOVEMBER 2021. I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPYTHE POSITIONS INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN THOSE POSITIONS BEFORE SIX (6) MONTHS AFTER FILING OFTHIS SUBDIVISION MAP AND THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BERETRACED AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP.DATE: _______________________________________________________________MATT D. MORROW, LS 8501 SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:CITY CONSULTANT'S STATEMENT:I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS PLAT OF FINAL MAP ENTITLED "RUBY ESTATES", AND I AM SATISFIEDTHAT SAID PLAT IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 66442 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT.DATE: __________________________________________________________MICHAEL E. LONG, PLS 6815ON BEHALF OF THE CITY ENGINEER OWNERS' STATEMENT:PURSUANT TO SECTION 66477.5 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE GRANTOROF THE DEDICATED PROPERTY IS AS FOLLOWS:AG EHC II (LEN) CA 2, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPC/O ESSENTIAL HOUSING ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC8585 E. HARTFORD DRIVE, SUITE 118SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY DEDICATED, IN FEE, IS AS FOLLOWS:COUNTY ROAD 25A AND COUNTY ROAD 102 SHOWN HEREON.THE CITY OF WOODLAND SHALL RECONVEY THE PROPERTY TO THE GRANTOR, OR THE SUCCCESSOR(S) ININTEREST, IF IT DETERMINES PURSUANT TO SECTION 66477.5 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT THAT THE SAMEPUBLIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE PROPERTY WAS DEDICATED DOES NOT EXIST EXCEPT FOR ALL OR ANYPORTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS REQUIRED FOR THAT SAME PUBLIC PURPOSE OR FOR PUBLICUTILITIES.

DEDICATION STATEMENT
CITY ENGINEER STATEMENT:I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS PLAT OF FINAL MAP ENTITLED "RUBY ESTATES" AND FIND IT TO BESUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS THE TENTATIVE MAP APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITYWOODLAND, AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF, AND THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAPACT AND ALL CITY ORDINANCES APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEENCOMPLIED WITH.DATED: __________________________________________________________BRENT MEYER, CITY ENGINEERREGISTRATION: RCE #52587NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT: A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OFTHE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THETRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.STATE OF )) §.COUNTY OF ) ON __________________________ BEFORE ME, _______________________________, NOTARY PUBLIC,PERSONALLY APPEARED ____________________________________ WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OFSATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHININSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIRAUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES) AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THEPERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THEINSTRUMENT.I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THEFOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.WITNESS MY HAND.BY: (NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE) ___________________________NAME: (PRINT NAME)_________________________NOTARY’S PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ___________________NOTARY’S COMMISSION EXPIRES ___________________NOTARY’S COMMISSION NUMBER ___________________ SHEET 1 OF 7 SHEETS
AG EHC II (LEN) CA 2, L.P., A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPBY: _____________________________________________________________________STEVEN S. BENSON, ITS MANAGERBY:ESSENTIAL HOUSING ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,ITS AUTHORIZED AGENT CUNNINGHAM ENGINEERINGBEING A MERGER AND RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 4, COUNTY ROAD 25A ANDA PORTION OF COUNTY ROAD 102 OF MAP NO. 5046, HERITAGE LARGE LOTPARCEL MAP, FILED IN BOOK 2014 AT PAGE 48, YOLO COUNTY RECORDSCITY OF WOODLAND YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIANOVEMBER 2024RUBY ESTATESSUBDIVISION MAP NO. 5221 I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND HAVE FOUND IT TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME ASIT APPEARED ON THE APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF, AND THATIT COMPLIES WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY ORDINANCES AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.DATE: _____________________________________________________________________________BRENT MEYERCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, CITY OF WOODLANDCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S STATEMENT

7273747576777879110
125126
141
7170 579
60 65666869
12346811101312141816151722192120232427262831352930403233373441363843394544424955464847505154535256595758636162 6467727076797377757174828078818384858687 25 LOT C
LOT A
LOT CS88°53'35"E 596.36' (2)
N01°06'25"E 501.03'
S00°55'25"W 122.54' (2)C1
C25
C39
S00°55'25"W 490.28' (490.46)(2)
L19S89°36'53"E 216.92' (2)
S79°55'58"E100.00' (2)
125.00'262.00'114.03'N88°53'35"W34.00'
N88°53'35"W34.00'

83.00'

LOT GLOT FLOT ELOT ILOT JLOT KLOT OLOT MLOT NLOT LLOT HLOT D N01°01'11"E 2652.34' (1),(2)1303.95' (2)
CURVELENGTHRADIUSDELTACHORDC1133.38'855.00'8°56'17"N84°24'07"W, 133.24'CURVE TABLELINE TABLELINELENGTHBEARINGL18.29N00°55'25"EC2465.16'745.00'5°00'40"S82°26'18"E, 65.14'C25125.89'745.00'9°40'55"S84°46'26"E, 125.74'C2652.71'745.00'4°03'15"S87°35'16"E, 52.70'C3815.62'10.00'89°28'38"S45°39'44"W, 14.08'C3913.00'33.00'22°34'16"N12°23'33"E, 12.92'S88°53'35"EL1920.38N65°13'42"E CUNNINGHAM ENGINEERINGBEING A MERGER AND RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 4, COUNTY ROAD 25A ANDA PORTION OF COUNTY ROAD 102 OF MAP NO. 5046, HERITAGE LARGE LOTPARCEL MAP, FILED IN BOOK 2014 AT PAGE 48, YOLO COUNTY RECORDSCITY OF WOODLAND YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIANOVEMBER 2024RUBY ESTATESSUBDIVISION MAP NO. 5221

MIEKLE AVENUE
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

1.THE SUM OF THE PARTS OF A LINE, CURVE OR AREA MAY NOT BE EQUAL TO THE WHOLE LENGTH OR ACREAGE DUE TO ROUNDING.2.ALL DISTANCES ARE GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, AND ARE EXPRESSED IN UNITED STATES SURVEY FEETAND DECIMALS THEREOF.3.EASEMENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES MAY AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON.4.REAR LOT CORNERS WILL BE MONUMENTED BY A 5/8" X 18" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP - LS 8501. FRONT CORNERS WILL BEMONUMENTED BY A 1" BRASS DISC IN SIDEWALK - LS 8501, PRODUCED 1.00 FEET FROM PROPERTY CORNER INTO CONCRETESIDEWALK.5.LOTS A, B, AND C, SHOWN HEREON, ARE COMMON AREA LOTS TO BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'SASSOCIATION AND CONTAIN PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS TOGETHER WITH PRIVATE ACCESS, DRAINAGE, UTILITY ANDMAINTENANCE EASEMENT, AS DESCRIBED IN THE OWNER'S STATEMENT HEREON.6.LOTS D THROUGH O, SHOWN HEREON, ARE SUBDIVISION TRAIL & WALKWAY PASEO LOTS TO BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THEHOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION AND CONTAIN PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS TOGETHER WITH PRIVATE ACCESS, DRAINAGE, UTILITYAND MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS, AS DESCRIBED IN THE OWNER'S STATEMENT HEREON.

THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE LINE CONNECTING EXISTING CITY MONUMENT T-22 ASSHOWN ON YOLO COUNTY BOOK OF MAPS 2002, PAGE 88, AND CITY MONUMENT T26R1 AS SHOWN ON YOLOCOUNTY BOOK OF MAPS 2007, PAGE 175, THE BEARING OF WHICH IS NORTH 01°17'30" EAST (SEE DETAIL "A").LEGEND: DIMENSION POINT - NOTHING FOUND OR SETFOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBEDFOUND CITY MONUMENT IN MONUMENT WELLSET 5/8"REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP - LS 8501SECTION CORNER-FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBEDACCESS RIGHTS RELINQUISHEDPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTOFFICIAL RECORDSPARCEL MAPPROPERTY LINEPORTIONIRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATIONCOUNTY ROADMEASUREDRADIALRECORD DATA PER 2000 PM 16RECORD DATA PER 2014 MB 48RECORD DATA PER 2015 MB 45RECORD DATA PER 2017 MB 82RECORD DATA PER DOC #2020 O.R. 0016647COUNTY ROAD 25A IMPROVEMENTS, 09/08/20COUNTY ROAD 25A IMPROVEMENTS, 12/14/20RECORD DATA PER 2007 RS 175RECORD DATA PER CR25A: PARKLAND AVENUE TO MIEKLE PUEO.R.PMPLPTNIODCR(M)(R)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) HERITAGE REMAINDER AREA - PHASE 12015 MB 45FOUND PER 2013MB 18, LS 5161N01°06'25"E 715.58' CR 25A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERIRREVOCABLE OFFER OFDEDICATION PER (5)(SEE SHEET 3)CENTER OFSECTION 10 263.68' (264.00)(4)189.90'262.00' (4)
FOUND PER (4),LS 5161
FOUND PER (4),LS 5161159.90'30.00'(7)WOODLANDCITY LIMITFOUND CITY MONUMENT IN MONUMENTWELL, LS 8501, SET WITH COUNTY ROAD 25A -MIEKLE TO PROMENADE IMPROVEMENTS (7)BANKS DRIVEDETAIL 'A'NTSBASIS OF BEARINGS(T26R1 TO T-22)N01°17'30"E 5552.43' (GRID)5552.74' (GROUND)S38°34'51"W68.63' T26R1 TO T-22
S88°53'35"E692.50'COUNTY ROAD 102S01°01'11"W 2652.34' EXISTING CITY MONUMENT T-22(PER 2002 MB 88)2" BRASS DISK IN MONUMENT WELL SECTION CORNERFOUND 2-3/4" BUTTONHEADIN MONUMENT WELL PER(1), 9 M&S 2HERITAGE PARKWAY E 1/4 CORSEC 10S01°01'11"W 2652.34'
SUBDIVISION NO. 4752VILLAGE 22005 MB 164
CR 102 PER (6)FOUND CITY MONUMENT INMONUMENT WELL, LS 5161,PER (6)

28.00'23.55'
HERITAGE PARKWAYHERITAGE PARK- UNIT 1A2005 MB 115SEE DETAIL 'A'SECTION CORNERFOUND 2-3/4" BUTTONHEADIN MONUMENT WELL (1),(2) FOUND 5/8" REBARW/ CAP L.S. 5161PER 2005 MB 1154.45' (2) CR 102
HERITAGE UNIT 1
LOT N2018 MB 96
CITY MONUMENTT26R1 PER (8)
LOT B
SHEET 2 OF 7 SHEETSCR 25AWOODLANDCITY LIMITMONUMENT PER (1)DESTROYED. REPLACEWITH 5/8" REBAR W/CAP HERITAGE REMAINDERAREA - PHASE 22017 MB 82

39.54' (2)
722.62' (6)
1301.86' (7)S89°36'53"E 2024.48'FOUND CITY MONUMENT INMONUMENT WELL, LS 8501,SET WITH COUNTY ROAD 25AIMPROVEMENTS (6) PROPERTY LINE PER (2),WOODLAND CITY LIMITLINE, AND EAST LINE OFSECTION 10, T 9 N, R 2 E,M.B.D.& M NOTES:

PROMENADEDRIVESEE SHEET 3
S89°36'53"E11.00'
SEE SHEET 3
CR 102 R/WPER (2)
COUNTY ROAD102 PER (6)
SEE SHEET 3CR 25A
(2)(2)
FOUND PER 2005MB 115, LS 5161
CR 102 RIGHT-OF-WAY PERIRREVOCABLE OFFER OFDEDICATION DOC- 2017-0010571(SEE SHEET 3) PARCEL 22000 MB 16

MIEKLE AVENUE7273747576777879
110125126141 7170
57960
65666869
123468111013121418161517
2219212023242726283135
2930403233373441363843394544424955464847505154535256595758636162 6467727076797377757174
828078818384858687
25 LOT C
LOT ALOT CS88°53'35"E 596.36'
489.41' (4) (489.59')(2)

55.00'C1
C25
C39
S00°55'25"W 490.28' (490.46)(2)
L19S89°36'53"E 216.92' (2)
S79°55'58"E100.00' (2)N89°36'53"W (2) 463.91'
140139138
N01°06'25"E 501.03' (501.20')(2)N89°36'53"W 271.09' (9) N79°55'58"W100.00' (9)N00°55'25"E 122.54' (2)67.54'
LOT B

LOT GLOT FLOT ELOT ILOT JLOT KLOT O

LOT MLOT N

LOT LLOT HLOT D
265375.00'N45°42'09"E (2)(4)S89°36'53"E 196.82' (2)(4)
N88°14'23"E 320.52' (2)(4)
N01°01'11"E 323.48' (2)(4)80.62'N08°08'41"E (2)(4)N01°01'11"E 753.50' (2)S01°01'11"W 1303.95' (2)

87.01'N01°06'25"E 130.46' (4)N01°06'25"E217.47'
185186187188189190191192193194195196197198
205204203202201200199168169
3433
N89°36'53"W 2013.48'S89°36'53"E (2) 1783.35'
S88°53'35"EL1920.38N65°13'42"EC3815.62'10.00'89°28'38"S45°39'44"W, 14.08'C3913.00'33.00'22°34'16"N12°23'33"E, 12.92'C2465.16'745.00'5°00'40"S82°26'18"E, 65.14'C25125.89'745.00'9°40'55"S84°46'26"E, 125.74'C2652.71'745.00'4°03'15"S87°35'16"E, 52.70'LINE TABLELINELENGTHBEARINGL18.29N00°55'25"ECURVELENGTHRADIUSDELTACHORDC1133.38'855.00'8°56'17"N84°24'07"W, 133.24'CURVE TABLE N89°36'53"W 271.09' (9)CUNNINGHAM ENGINEERINGBEING A MERGER AND RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 4, COUNTY ROAD 25A ANDA PORTION OF COUNTY ROAD 102 OF MAP NO. 5046, HERITAGE LARGE LOTPARCEL MAP, FILED IN BOOK 2014 AT PAGE 48, YOLO COUNTY RECORDSCITY OF WOODLAND YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIANOVEMBER 2024RUBY ESTATESSUBDIVISION MAP NO. 5221SHEET 3 OF 7 SHEETS HERITAGE REMAINDERAREA - PHASE 22017 MB 82PROMENADE DRIVE 711.62' (6)
1301.86' (7)
N89°36'53"W 1175.29' (2)(4)COUNTY ROAD 25AN44°36'53"W45.33' (2)(4)S88°53'35"E68.00' (2)(4)S45°23'07"W45.27' (2)(4)S44°36'53"E45.24' (2)(4)S89°35'22"E57.00' (2)(4)S89°36'53"E9.91' (2)(4) S88°58'49"E61.00' (2)
L=63.22' R=150.00'Δ=24°08'51",CH=S78°18'41"W, 62.75'L=210.73' R=250.00'Δ=48°17'42",CH=S89°36'53"E, 204.54'L=63.22' R=150.00'Δ=24°08'51",CH=N77°32'27"W, 62.75'

BROOKSHIRE CIRCLE

GIDDINGSCOURTCHAMBERLAINCOURT
COUNTY ROAD 102
SEE DETAIL 'C'FOUND 5/8" REBARW/ CAP L.S. 5161PER 2005 MB 115 N01°06'25"E189.90'159.90'30.00'(7)WOODLAND CITY LIMIT7.438± AC.

C39L1934.00'34.00'L=124.59' R=800.00'Δ=8°55'24",CH=N84°23'40"W, 124.47'L=135.18' R=800.00'Δ=9°40'55",CH=S84°46'26"E, 135.02'(9)(9)(5)(5)(5) (2)(2)

SEE DETAIL 'B'
PARCEL 22000 MB 16
N44°36'53"W45.33' (2)(4)
DETAIL 'B'NTSS88°53'35"E68.00' (2)(4)N01°06'25"E11.61' (2)CR 25A FOUND PER(9), LS ####
FOUND PER(7), LS 850155.0'

55.0'

67.0'28.0'
VARIES

71.0' 61.0'
FOUND PER (4),LS 5161
FOUND PER(6), LS 8501
FOUND PER (4),LS 5161

28.0'

28.0'
DETAIL 'C'NTSCR 102 RIGHT-OF-WAY PERIRREVOCABLE OFFER OFDEDICATION DOC- 2017-001057148.70'N01°01'11"E48.81'S44°15'46"E30.00'S89°36'53"ES88°58'49"E, 2.75' WOODLANDCITY LIMITSEE SHEET 2FOR TIESCR 25ACR 102S01°01'11"W13.94'1783.35'S89°36'53"E IOD TO COUNTYOF YOLO PER (5)
HERITAGE REMAINDERAREA - PHASE 12015 MB 45
SEE SHEET 2 FOR LEGEND & NOTES
MONUMENT PER (1)DESTROYED. REPLACEWITH 5/8" REBAR W/CAP

CURVELENGTHRADIUSDELTACHORDC1133.38'855.00'8°56'17"N84°24'07"W, 133.24'CURVE TABLELINE TABLELINELENGTHBEARINGN00°55'25"E S89°04'35"E 62.50'S89°04'35"E 62.50'
S89°04'35"E 62.50'S89°04'35"E 62.50'S89°04'35"E 59.82'S89°04'35"E 59.82'S89°04'35"E 59.82'S89°04'35"E 59.82'S89°04'35"E 58.43'S89°04'35"E 58.43' S89°04'35"E 58.98'S89°04'35"E 58.98'S89°04'35"E 58.98'S89°04'35"E 58.98'S89°04'35"E 58.43'S89°04'35"E 58.43'

8.00' 8.00'73.17'70.48'70.48'69.10'

62.50'

62.50'

33.50'33.50'40.92'33.50'42.70'36.00'5.00'

36.00'33.51'33.50'36.00'33.50'36.00'51.73'

44.03'

42.78'

43.62'

43.20'

41.15'

43.17'

DAHLER LANEHOLCOLM LANE

HOLCOLM PLACEDAHLER PLACECHAMBERLAIN LANELOT C
LOT C
C16 C17C18
L7 L9
C15
L10
80,287 Sq Ft1.843 Ac.

S00°55'25"W 490.28'
S88°53'35"E 596.36'
S89°04'35"E 67.50'S88°53'35"E 124.87'
N00°55'25"E 162.52'N00°55'25"E 181.70'
N00°55'25"E 475.64'
S89°04'35"E 67.50'
N00°55'25"E 177.75'
S88°53'35"E 107.63'S88°53'35"E 104.87'

36.00'33.50'70.14'

36.00'51.54'70.14'

33.50'38.90'36.00'32.64'S88°53'35"E 125.94'

4.00'PUE

4.00'PUE

4.00'PUE
151413161718192021222324LOT A2526303135363940
L21

10.67'10.67'L8 10.67'10.67'4.00'PUE

4.00'PUE11.50'11.50'23.00'10.67'10.67'

21.33'N00°55'25"E 224.46'N00°55'25"E 242.43'
N00°55'25"E 122.82'N00°55'25"E 100.39'S88°53'35"E 516.94'148.13'146.20'12.50'31.00'43.50'12.50'31.00'43.50'

4.00'PUE 4.00'PUE

4.00'PUE 38.71'4,734 Sq Ft2,546 Sq Ft1,958 Sq Ft2,612 Sq Ft2,445 Sq Ft2,153 Sq Ft2,683 Sq Ft2,582 Sq Ft2,004 Sq Ft2,696 Sq Ft2,769 Sq Ft2,094 Sq Ft2,558 Sq Ft 2,094 Sq Ft2,250 Sq Ft1,982 Sq Ft3,046 Sq Ft2,123 Sq Ft2,268 Sq Ft1,958 Sq Ft2,109 Sq Ft2,123 Sq Ft58.43'58.95'8.00'58.98'8.00'48.47'49.85'49.78'5.00'

5.00'PUE PUE8.00' 8.00'117.14'
182.50'
N00°55'25"E 120.32'N00°55'25"E 120.32'N00°55'25"E 100.35'N00°55'25"E 100.29' N00°55'25"E 189.83'N00°55'25"E 168.91'N00°55'25"E 168.93'N00°55'25"E 189.05'N00°55'25"E 182.50' N00°55'25"E 120.32'N00°55'25"E 120.32'N00°55'25"E 100.35'N00°55'25"E 117.12'40.92'33.50'32.50'

31.31'36.00'32.98'

33.46'33.50'33.39'

33.88'33.50'32.98'

21.33'

21.33'

PUE PUE
PUE PUE4.00'PUE 4.00'PUE L2023.95N02°55'05"EL2122.45N01°12'12"W3.50S54°56'05"WL721.33S88°53'35"EL810.00N00°55'25"EL921.33S88°53'35"EL1010.00N00°55'25"ES89°04'35"EC1412.25'19.50'35°59'20"S17°04'15"E, 12.05'C151.06'19.50'3°07'22"S02°29'06"W, 1.06'C1615.68'10.00'89°49'00"S43°59'05"E, 14.12'C1715.74'10.00'90°11'00"N46°00'55"E, 14.16'C1815.68'10.00'89°49'00"S43°59'05"E, 14.12' CUNNINGHAM ENGINEERINGBEING A MERGER AND RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 4, COUNTY ROAD 25A ANDA PORTION OF COUNTY ROAD 102 OF MAP NO. 5046, HERITAGE LARGE LOTPARCEL MAP, FILED IN BOOK 2014 AT PAGE 48, YOLO COUNTY RECORDSCITY OF WOODLAND YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIANOVEMBER 2024RUBY ESTATESSUBDIVISION MAP NO. 5221SHEET 4 OF 7 SHEETS HERITAGE REMAINDERAREA - PHASE 12015 MB 45
SEE SHEET 5
SEE SHEET 6
LOT N2018 MB 96
LOT D586 SFPUELOT E963 SF
LOT F963 SF
SEE SHEET 2 FOR LEGEND & NOTES
LOT H912 SFPUE LOT J1,516 SFLOT I1,351 SF

CURVELENGTHRADIUSDELTACHORDC1133.38'855.00'8°56'17"N84°24'07"W, 133.24'C273.29'855.00'4°54'41"N86°04'49"W, 73.27'C355.09'855.00'3°41'31"N81°46'44"W, 55.08'C416.50'10.00'94°31'31"S48°11'11"W, 14.69'C549.28'1113.50'2°32'09"N83°16'59"W, 49.28'C6107.20'1113.50'5°30'57"N81°47'35"W, 107.16'C749.85'1113.50'2°33'54"N80°19'04"W, 49.85'C82.31'1197.50'0°06'38"S79°05'26"E, 2.31'C913.97'10.00'80°04'10"N39°06'40"W, 12.87'C102.92'1153.50'0°08'43"S79°06'28"E, 2.92'C1156.75'1157.50'2°48'33"N80°26'23"W, 56.75'C1241.06'1142.00'2°03'36"N83°10'49"W, 41.06'C1313.72'16.00'49°08'41"S59°38'16"E, 13.31'C1412.25'19.50'35°59'20"S17°04'15"E, 12.05'C151.06'19.50'3°07'22"S02°29'06"W, 1.06' CURVE TABLELINE TABLELINELENGTHBEARINGL18.29N00°55'25"EL221.33S89°04'35"EL311.59N00°55'25"EL421.33S89°04'35"EL58.00N89°04'35"WL63.50S54°56'05"WS88°53'35"EL5

16.05'4.46'L3L1
C22C23C9C7C5C4C6C14C13
C46C24C2 L4L2C1
C20L6
C3 C25
C21
C10LOT CGIDDINGS LANEC19C12C11
S00°55'25"W 490.28'N00°55'25"E 162.52'N00°55'25"E 181.70' N00°55'25"E 104.39'N00°55'25"E 102.90'
N00°55'25"E 475.64'N00°55'25"E 177.75'
N00°55'25"E 109.40'S79°55'58"E 100.00'N00°59'28"E 83.00'

31.58'38.50'

33.50'41.00'51.70'38.50'

39.01'36.00'34.40'

37.30'38.50'33.50'

37.63'

27.10'36.00'39.80'

24.39'36.00'33.50'

30.77'36.00'36.00'38.50'S89°04'35"E 67.50'

4.00' PUE

4.00'PUE

4.00' PUE

4.00'PUEC42C43C41C40L20
DAHLER COURTHOLCOLM COURTLOT CN00°55'25"E 104.39'N00°55'25"E 128.75'

21.33'21.33'43.50'16.00' 12.50'43.50'31.00'

DAHLER LANEHOLCOLM LANELOT C

10.00'10.00'

10.67'10.67'10.67'10.67'

12.50'31.00'

4.00'PUE

4.00'PUE LOT C80,287 Sq Ft1.843 Ac.

N00°55'25"E 242.43'N00°55'25"E 224.46'

12.50'28.50'

23.00'

4.00'PUE 4.00'PUE

43.50'(R)3 (R)9(R)12
(R)16 (R)11
PUE
N00°55'25"E 168.93'N00°55'25"E 168.91'
N00°55'25"E 110.54'S89°04'35"E 62.50'S89°04'35"E62.50'62.50'62.50'S89°04'35"E 62.50'S89°04'35"E 62.50'38.50'

36.04'

33.50'41.00'

38.50'36.00'
272829646566
2,563 Sq Ft2,094 Sq Ft2,406 Sq FtN00°55'25"E 182.50'S89°04'35"E 62.50'

5.00'
C45

5.00'11.5'11.5'
S89°04'35"E 58.98'S89°04'35"E 58.98'S89°04'35"E 58.98' N00°55'25"E 127.49'S89°04'35"E 59.82'S89°04'35"E 59.82'S89°04'35"E 59.82'S89°04'35"E 59.82'N00°55'25"E 127.22'39.25'

42.67'

48.60'

42.62'52.24'

36.00'33.50'38.50'

14.63'

36.00'

44.55'333867686970717236.00'
32371,976 Sq Ft2,123 Sq Ft2,271 Sq Ft2,768 Sq Ft
2,713 Sq Ft2,153 Sq Ft2,730 Sq Ft2,843 Sq Ft2,153 Sq Ft2,750 Sq Ft 342,389 Sq FtS89°04'35"E 58.43'S89°04'35"E 58.43'
N00°55'25"E 126.78'S89°04'35"E 58.43'S89°04'35"E 58.43'N00°55'25"E 127.01'

44.84'

46.92'

38.50'33.50'

36.00'44.09'
4243737475
1,958 Sq Ft2,250 Sq Ft2,415 Sq Ft
2,745 Sq Ft2,104 Sq Ft2,706 Sq Ft
N00°55'25"E 189.83'N00°55'25"E 189.05'
(R)5(R)6(R)8
(R)7
41 C48C49C474.00' PUE
S89°04'35"E 58.98'
S89°04'35"E 58.98'S89°04'35"E 58.43'

8.10'71.39'
(R)10(R)410.67'10.67'182.50'
110.50'

PUE PUE PUE
PUEPUE

21.33'
2,250 Sq Ft2,406 Sq Ft2,402 Sq Ft

11.0'3.0'PUE7.5'PUE4.00'PUE

4.00'PUE

4.00' PUE

4.00'PUEC8
(R)2
L1920.38N65°13'42"EL2023.95N02°55'05"E
C3913.00'33.00'22°34'16"N12°23'33"E, 12.92'C40130.06'1126.00'6°37'05"N82°20'39"W, 129.99'C4119.31'1185.00'0°56'01"S79°30'07"E, 19.31'C42146.98'1185.00'7°06'24"S83°31'20"E, 146.89'C43218.49'1185.00'10°33'51"S84°19'02"E, 218.18'C4452.20'1185.00'2°31'25"S88°20'15"E, 52.19'C455.00'855.00'0°20'06"N88°42'13"W, 5.00'C468.02'745.00'0°37'00"S85°15'08"E, 8.02'C478.06'1113.50'0°24'54"N81°48'28"W, 8.06'C488.04'1197.50'0°23'04"S83°35'27"E, 8.04'C498.04'1154.00'0°23'57"S83°23'00"E, 8.04' C1815.68'10.00'89°49'00"S43°59'05"E, 14.12'C1958.92'1154.00'2°55'32"S81°43'16"E, 58.92'C20125.55'1154.00'6°14'01"S83°22'30"E, 125.49'C21104.50'1197.50'5°00'00"S83°37'53"E, 104.47'C2247.39'1197.50'2°16'03"S82°15'54"E, 47.39'C2317.09'10.00'97°56'43"S49°53'46"W, 15.09'C2465.16'745.00'5°00'40"S82°26'18"E, 65.14'C25125.89'745.00'9°40'55"S84°46'26"E, 125.74'745.00'4°03'15"S87°35'16"E, 52.70' RADIAL BEARINGS(R)1N01°07'45"E(R)2N06°22'31"E(R)3N07°59'05"E(R)4N07°51'00"E(R)5S06°13'01"W(R)6S06°25'01"W(R)7N04°26'22"E(R)8N08°23'59"E(R)9S06°36'05"W(R)10S06°48'58"W(R)11N05°03'22"E(R)12S10°49'10"W(R)15S66°19'19"E(R)16N1°27'50"E CUNNINGHAM ENGINEERINGBEING A MERGER AND RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 4, COUNTY ROAD 25A ANDA PORTION OF COUNTY ROAD 102 OF MAP NO. 5046, HERITAGE LARGE LOTPARCEL MAP, FILED IN BOOK 2014 AT PAGE 48, YOLO COUNTY RECORDSCITY OF WOODLAND YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIANOVEMBER 2024RUBY ESTATESSUBDIVISION MAP NO. 5221SHEET 5 OF 7 SHEETS LOT N2018 MB 96
CR 25A16.05'8.10'ACCESSALLOWED
LOT B675 SF
SEE SHEET 4
SEE SHEET 7
SEE SHEET 3
(R)
(R)1
SEE SHEET 2 FOR LEGEND & NOTES
LOT H912 SFPUE
LOT L552 SFPUE LOT M1,019 SFLOT N1,015 SF
LOT I1,351 SF
LOT J1,516 SF

CURVELENGTHRADIUSDELTACHORD133.38'855.00'8°56'17"N84°24'07"W, 133.24'CURVE TABLE LINE TABLELINELENGTHBEARINGL18.29N00°55'25"E
C3258.59'1154.00'2°54'31"S85°02'15"E, 58.58'C3315.74'10.00'90°11'00"N46°00'55"E, 14.16'C3415.68'10.00'89°49'00"S43°59'05"E, 14.12'C3515.74'10.00'90°11'00"N46°00'55"E, 14.16'C3615.68'10.00'89°49'00"S43°59'05"E, 14.12'L1421.33S89°04'35"EL1521.33S88°53'35"EL1610.00N00°55'25"EL1710.00N00°55'25"EL1821.33S88°53'35"E

LEISER LANEKAUFMAN LANE
KAUFMAN PLACELEISER PLACECHAMBERLAIN LANEC33C34 C35C36
N00°55'25"E 194.46'N00°55'25"E 193.77'36.00'38.50'38.50'

36.00'38.50'36.00'

62.43'

31.71'36.00'32.58'

33.89'33.50'32.96'
S01°06'25"W 262.00' (4)
S88°53'35"E 596.36'S89°04'35"E 66.89'S89°04'35"E 66.78' S88°53'35"E 124.87'S88°53'35"E 124.00'S88°53'35"E 66.50' N00°55'25"E 193.41'
S89°04'35"E 66.36'S89°04'35"E 66.24'S89°04'35"E 66.13' N00°55'25"E 100.35'N00°55'25"E 100.35'
N00°55'25"E 193.67'
S88°53'35"E 104.87'S88°53'35"E 104.00'S88°53'35"E 56.68'N00°55'25"E 100.29'N00°55'25"E 100.29' N01°06'25"E 501.03'

31.71'36.00'32.58'

31.72'36.00'32.57'

44.34'33.50'42.48'

38.50'38.50'38.06'

36.00'36.00'44.99'

32.96'

45.20'36.00'36.00'

34.15'33.50'32.70'
N88°53'35"W34.00' (TIE)
125.00'
262.00'

10.00'PUE2,929 Sq Ft2,239 Sq Ft2,959 Sq Ft
2,996 Sq Ft2,387 Sq Ft2,383 Sq Ft
L15 L18L16 L174.00'PUE 4.00'PUE

4.00' PUE62616059
5756555452515049
47464544
121110987654321

10.67'10.67'10.67'10.67'21.33'21.33'

MIEKLE AVENUE

10.67'10.67'10.67'10.67'
S88°53'35"E 516.94'N00°55'25"E 122.82'N00°55'25"E 122.82'146.20'145.33'77.27'43.50' 43.50'12.50'31.00'12.50'31.00'

21.33'21.33'
N00°55'25"E 256.18'N00°55'25"E 255.54'

21.33'21.33'

12.50'31.00'

77.69'
LOT C80,287 Sq Ft1.843 Ac.43.50'

4.00'PUE 4.00'PUE34.0'34.0'

34.0'34.0'
2,395 Sq Ft2,088 Sq Ft2,581 Sq Ft2,528 Sq Ft1,943 Sq Ft2,593 Sq Ft2,412 Sq Ft2,104 Sq Ft2,600 Sq Ft 2,109 Sq Ft2,250 Sq Ft2,250 Sq Ft2,370 Sq Ft2,088 Sq Ft2,233 Sq Ft2,213 Sq Ft2,233 Sq Ft2,233 Sq Ft36.00'38.50'36.00'

36.00'38.50'38.50'38.50'38.50'
PUE

33.50'36.00'

40.96'
S89°04'35"E 58.43'S89°04'35"E 58.43'N00°55'25"E 120.32'S89°04'35"E 58.00'S89°04'35"E 58.00'S89°04'35"E 58.00'S89°04'35"E 58.00'N00°55'25"E 120.32' N00°55'25"E 194.39'N00°55'25"E 189.83'S89°04'35"E 58.43'S89°04'35"E 58.43'S89°04'35"E 58.43' S89°04'35"E 58.00'S89°04'35"E 58.00'S89°04'35"E 58.00' S89°04'35"E 58.00'S89°04'35"E 58.00'S89°04'35"E 58.00' N00°55'25"E 194.48'
N00°55'25"E 120.32'

8.00'69.10'68.67'

58.43'58.00'8.00'58.00'48.03'8.00'47.97'48.40'

40.77'36.00'36.19'38.25'

68.67'

41.57'

42.75'

41.56'36.00'42.76'

44.04'

42.78'PUE
PUE4.00' PUE4.00' PUE

4.00' PUE4.00' PUE

4.00'PUE 10.00'PUE
CUNNINGHAM ENGINEERINGBEING A MERGER AND RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 4, COUNTY ROAD 25A ANDA PORTION OF COUNTY ROAD 102 OF MAP NO. 5046, HERITAGE LARGE LOTPARCEL MAP, FILED IN BOOK 2014 AT PAGE 48, YOLO COUNTY RECORDSCITY OF WOODLAND YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIANOVEMBER 2024RUBY ESTATESSUBDIVISION MAP NO. 5221SHEET 6 OF 7 SHEETS HERITAGE REMAINDERAREA - PHASE 12015 MB 45

4.68'
SEE SHEET 7
SEE SHEET 4CHAMBERLAINCOURTHERITAGE REMAINDERAREA - PHASE 22017 MB 82HERITAGE REMAINDERAREA - PHASE 22017 MB 82 SEE SHEET 2 FOR LEGEND & NOTES
LOT G963 SF
LOT K1,555 SF

CURVELENGTHRADIUSDELTACHORDCURVE TABLE
LINE TABLELINELENGTHBEARINGL18.29N00°55'25"EL1121.33S89°04'35"EL1216.65N00°55'25"EL1316.22N00°55'25"EL1421.33S89°04'35"E MIEKLE AVENUE16.76'

LEISER LANE

KAUFMAN LANE

LEISER COURT
KAUFMAN COURTGIDDINGS LANELOT CC31C29C30
C37C38
C28C27C32C26 C20C25 C2128.32'38.50'31.01'28.97'36.00'31.45'

55.16'
N00°55'25"E 194.46'N00°55'25"E 193.77'44.77'36.00'43.00'36.00' S01°06'25"W 715.58'
N00°55'25"E 193.41'S89°04'35"E 66.13'S89°04'35"E 66.02' S89°35'57"E 72.28'
S89°35'57"E 55.84'
N00°55'25"E 96.42'
S89°04'35"E 65.61'S89°04'35"E 65.50'N00°55'25"E 193.67' S89°35'57"E 82.77'
S89°35'57"E 65.89'
N00°55'25"E 97.84'
S89°36'53"E 216.92'
N01°06'25"E 501.03'

40.11'38.50'

42.11'33.50'

29.88'33.50'32.63'

33.50'43.51'

33.50'42.71'29.88'33.50'33.01'
N88°53'35"W34.00' (TIE)262.00'114.03'10.00'PUE
L14
L11L12
L13L19C39

4.00' PUE
8786858483828180797877766362585753524847
C44C42C43

12.50'31.00'
S89°35'57"E 169.61'93.15'

76.46'43.50'31.00'12.50'

12.50'31.00'43.50'

12.50'31.00'43.50'N00°55'25"E 119.46'N00°55'25"E 256.18' N00°55'25"E 118.70'N00°55'25"E 255.54'

21.33'

21.33'

10.67'10.67'

10.67'10.67'
S01°06'25"W 189.90'S01°06'25"W 262.00' (4)80,287 Sq Ft1.843 Ac.10.67'10.67'

10.67'10.67'

4.00'PUE4.00'PUE

4.00'PUE4.00'PUE

34.0'34.0' 34.0'34.0'2,214 Sq Ft2,797 Sq Ft
3,051 Sq Ft2,817 Sq Ft2,196 Sq Ft
2,104 Sq Ft2,510 Sq Ft2,088 Sq Ft2,511 Sq Ft2,233 Sq Ft2,342 Sq Ft 2,453 Sq Ft2,250 Sq Ft2,795 Sq Ft
2,377 Sq Ft2,088 Sq Ft2,801 Sq Ft2,440 Sq Ft1,943 Sq Ft2,869 Sq Ft S89°04'35"E 58.43'S89°04'35"E 58.43'
S89°04'35"E 58.00'S89°04'35"E 58.00'
S89°04'35"E 58.00'S89°04'35"E 58.00'S89°04'35"E 58.00'S89°04'35"E 58.00' S89°04'35"E 58.00'S89°04'35"E 58.00'
S89°04'35"E 58.43'S89°04'35"E 58.43'43.75' 40.64'

16.37'8.00'68.67'8.00'68.67' 8.00'40.64'36.00' 36.00'

38.50'

33.50'

36.00'

38.50'43.21'46.75'44.97'

44.53'

42.19'41.47'
(R)5(R)6
(R)13(R)14PUE
(R)7

16.42'
(R)15

4.00'PUE
N00°55'25"E 96.39'N00°55'25"E 96.01'N00°55'25"E 194.39' N00°55'25"E 189.83'
N00°55'25"E 194.48'N00°55'25"E 122.44'
N00°55'25"E 126.78'
N00°55'25"E 122.44'47.91'58.00'PUE
PUE

4.00'PUE

4.00'PUE 4.00'PUE

4.00'PUE

10.00'PUE
C1958.92'1154.00'2°55'32"S81°43'16"E, 58.92'C20125.55'1154.00'6°14'01"S83°22'30"E, 125.49'C21104.50'1197.50'5°00'00"S83°37'53"E, 104.47'C25125.89'745.00'9°40'55"S84°46'26"E, 125.74'C2652.71'745.00'4°03'15"S87°35'16"E, 52.70'C2749.08'1197.50'2°20'53"S84°57'26"E, 49.07'C2815.19'10.00'87°03'18"N42°36'14"W, 13.77'C2915.88'10.00'90°58'57"S46°24'54"W, 14.26'C3031.46'1197.50'1°30'20"S88°50'48"E, 31.46'C3141.24'1154.00'2°02'51"S88°34'32"E, 41.24'C3258.59'1154.00'2°54'31"S85°02'15"E, 58.58'C3315.74'10.00'90°11'00"N46°00'55"E, 14.16'C3615.68'10.00'89°49'00"S43°59'05"E, 14.12'C3715.80'10.00'90°31'22"N44°20'16"W, 14.21'C3815.62'10.00'89°28'38"S45°39'44"W, 14.08'C3913.00'33.00'22°34'16"N12°23'33"E, 12.92'C41S79°30'07"E, 19.31'C42146.98'1185.00'7°06'24"S83°31'20"E, 146.89'C43218.49'1185.00'10°33'51"S84°19'02"E, 218.18'C4452.20'1185.00'2°31'25"S88°20'15"E, 52.19' S88°53'35"EL1920.38N65°13'42"ERADIAL BEARINGSS10°49'10"W(R)13S03°30'30"W(R)14S02°26'54"W(R)15S66°19'19"E(R)5S06°13'01"W(R)6S06°25'01"W(R)7N04°26'22"E CUNNINGHAM ENGINEERINGBEING A MERGER AND RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 4, COUNTY ROAD 25A ANDA PORTION OF COUNTY ROAD 102 OF MAP NO. 5046, HERITAGE LARGE LOTPARCEL MAP, FILED IN BOOK 2014 AT PAGE 48, YOLO COUNTY RECORDSCITY OF WOODLAND YOLO COUNTY CALIFORNIANOVEMBER 2024RUBY ESTATESSUBDIVISION MAP NO. 5221SHEET 7 OF 7 SHEETSDETAIL 'D' SEE SHEET 6
SEE SHEET 5
SEE SHEET 3

SEEDETAIL 'D'
N88°53'35"W 34.00' (TIE)12.50'31.00'114.03'N01°06'25"E 501.03'262.00' CR 25A
SCALE: 1"= 10'

24.09'102.41' (4)87.49'SEE SHEETS2 & 3CR 25A
N01°06'25"E0.42'MIEKLEAVE.GIDDINGSLANESEE SHEET 3
GIDDINGSCOURTHERITAGE REMAINDERAREA - PHASE 22017 MB 82HERITAGE REMAINDERAREA - PHASE 22017 MB 82LOT K1,555 SF SEE SHEET 2 FOR LEGEND & NOTES
LOT O980 SF

RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

CITY OF WOODLAND
300 First Street
Woodland, California 95695
ATTN: City Clerk

(Exempt from Filing Fees – Government Code § 2783)

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT

FOR COMPLETION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 5221

between

THE CITY OF WOODLAND
a California municipal corporation
and
AG EHC II (LEN) CA 2, L.P.

A Delaware limited partnership
and

LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC
a California Limited Liability Company

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

1 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT

FOR COMPLETION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 5221

I. P

ARTIES AND DATE

This Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the Comp letion of Public Improvements (“Agreement”) is entered into as of this ____ day of _________, 2024, by and between the CITY OF WOODLAND, a California municipal corporation (“C ity”) AG EHC II (LEN) CA 2, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Owner”), and Lennar Homes of California, LLC., a California limited liability company (“Developer”). City and Developer are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

II. R

ECITALS

A. Owner’s tentative subdivision map for real prope rty located within City, a legal description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” (“Property”), was conditionally approved by the Woodland City Council on July 19, 2022. The tentative subdivision map is identified in City records as Subdivision Map No. 5221, Ruby Estates Subdivision (“Map”).

B. Developer proposes to do and perform certain wor k of improvement thereon as set forth in this Agreement, with the consent of Owner.

C. Developer has submitted and requests approval of Final Map No. 5221, which relates, in whole or in part, to the subdivision proposed by Developer’s Map for the Property.

D. Developer has not completed all of the work or m ade all of the public improvements required by Chapter 16 of the Woodland Municipal Co de, the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410, et seq.) (“Map Act”), the conditions of approval for the Map, or other ordinances, resolutions, or policies of City requiring construction of improvements in conjunction with the subdivision of land.

E. Pursuant to Chapter 16 of the Woodland Municipal Code and the applicable provisions of the Map Act, Developer, Owner and Cit y enter into this Agreement for the timely construction and completion of the public improveme nts and the furnishing of the security therefor, acceptable to the City Engineer and City Attorney, for the Map.

F. Owner’s and Developer’s execution of this Agreem ent and the provision of the security are made in consideration of City’s approval of the final map for the Property.

G. The development of the Property is also subject to the terms and conditions of a development agreement, approved by the Woodland City Council on July 19, 2022.

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

2 III. T ERMS

1.0 Effectiveness. This Agreement shall not be eff ective unless and until all four of the following conditions are satisfied: (a) Developer provides City with security of the type and in the amounts required by this Agreement; (b) Owner and Developer execute and record this Agreement in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Yolo; (c) the City Council of the City of Woodland (“City Council”) approves the final map for the Property; and (d) Owner records the final map for the Property in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Yolo. If any of the above described conditions are not satisfied, this Agreement shall automatically terminate without need of further action by either City or Developer, and Developer may not thereafter record the final map for the Property.

1.1 Definitions. For purposes of enforcing this A greement, the term “City” shall include, but shall not be limited to, City Co uncil, Public Works Director, City Engineer, Community Development Director, Building Official, or any of their authorized representatives.

City shall have the sole and absolute discretion to determine which public body, public official, or public employee may act on behalf of City for any particular purpose.

2.0 Public Improvements. Developer shall construct or have constructed at its own cost, expense, and liability all improvements requi red by City as part of the approval of the Map, including, but not limited to, all grading, roads, paving, curbs and gutters, pathways, storm drains, sanitary sewers, utilities, drainage facilities, traffic controls, landscaping, street lights, and all other required facilities as shown in detail on the plans , profiles, and specifications which have been prepared by or on behalf of Developer for the Map ( “Public Improvements”). The Public Improvements are more specifically described in Exh ibit “B,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Construction of the Public Improvements shall include any transitions and/or other incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. Developer shall be responsible for the replacement, relocatio n, or removal of any component of any utility system or public improvement in conflict with the c onstruction or installation of the Public Improvements. Such replacement, relocation, or remo val shall be performed to the complete satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such utility system or public improvement.

Developer further promises and agrees to provide al l equipment, tools, materials, labor, tests, design work, and engineering services necessary or required by City to fully and adequately complete the Public Improvements.

2.1 Prior Partial Construction of Public Improvemen ts. Subject to Section 2.3, herein, where construction of any Public Improvemen ts has been partially completed prior to the execution of this Agreement, Developer agrees to co mplete such Public Improvements or ensure their completion in accordance with this Agreement.

2.2 Permits; Notices; Utility Statements. Prior to commencing any work, Developer shall, at its sole cost, expense, and lia bility, obtain all necessary permits and licenses and give all necessary and incidental notices requi red for the lawful construction of the Public

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

3 Improvements and performance of Developer’s obligations under this Agreement. Developer shall conduct the work in full compliance with the regulations, rules, and other requirements contained in any permit or license issued to Developer. Prior to commencing any work, Developer shall file a written statement with the City Clerk and the City Engineer, signed by Developer and each utility that will provide utility service to the Property, attesting that Developer has made all deposits legally required by the utility for the extension and provision of utility service to the Property.

2.3 Pre-approval of Plans and Specifications. Deve loper is prohibited from commencing work on any Public Improvement until all plans, specifications, estimates, and bonds for such Public Improvement have been submitted to and approved by the City Engineer, or his/her authorized designee. Approval by the City Engineer shall not relieve Developer from ensuring that all Public Improvements conform with all other requ irements and standards set forth in this Agreement.

2.4 Quality of Work; Compliance With Laws and Codes . The construction plans and specifications for the Public Improvement s shall be prepared in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinanc es, regulations, codes, standards, and other requirements. The Public Improvements shall be completed in accordance with all approved maps, conditions, plans, specifications, standard drawing s, and special amendments thereto on file with City, as well as all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations, codes, standards, and other requirements applicable at the time work is actually commenced.

2.5 Standard of Performance. Developer and its con tractors, if any, shall perform all work required to construct the Public Improvements under this Agreement in a skillful and workmanlike manner, and consistent with the sta ndards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Developer represents and maintains that it or its contractors shall be s killed in the professional calling necessary to perform the work. Developer warrants that all of i ts employees and contractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the work assigned to them, and that they shall have all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the work, and that such licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement.

2.6 Alterations to Improvements. The Public Improv ements in Exhibit “B” are understood to be only a general designation of the work and improvements to be done, and not a binding description thereof. All work shall be done and improvements made and completed as shown on approved plans and specifications, and any subsequent alterations thereto. If during the course of construction and installation of the Public Improvements it is determined that the public interest requires alterations in the Public Improve ments, Developer shall undertake such design and construction changes as may be reasonably requi red by City. Any and all alterations in the plans and specifications and the Public Improvement s to be completed may be accomplished without giving prior notice thereof to Developer’s surety for this Agreement.

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

4 2.7 Superintendence by Developer. Developer shall require each contractor and subcontractor to have a competent foreperson on the job at all times when that contractor or subcontractor, or any employee or agent thereof, is performing work on the Public Improvements.

Before starting work on the Public Improvements, each contractor and subcontractor shall submit in writing the name of the proposed foreperson, who shall be subject to the review and approval of City. Following approval by City, each foreperso n shall be present at the work site at all times that any work is in progress and at any time that a ny employee of the contractor or subcontractor is present at the work site. The Developer shall employ a competent construction manager that is responsible for the entire work. Each contractor or subcontractor shall contractually report to the construction manager, either directly or through a subcontract. At a minimum, the construction manager shall be onsite 2-3 times/week and will be available to attend weekly jobsite meetings with the City. The construction manager shall be i mmediately available by phone during hours when construction is in progress and shall be available in person within two hours when requested by the City. The construction manager shall coordi nate the work such that construction and the associated inspection happen in an efficient manner . Should a contractor or subcontractor desire to change its foreperson, it shall provide the info rmation specified above and obtain City's prior written approval. City, in its sole and absolute di scretion, may require any contractor or subcontractor to replace its foreperson provided th at City gives the contractor or subcontractor at least forty-eight hours written notice.

Developer shall, at all times, enforce strict disc ipline and good order among its employees and those of its subcontractors and shall not employ any unfit person or anyone not skilled in the assigned task. If any person employed by, the developer, a contractor or subcontractor fails or refuses to carry out the directions of the City or appears to the City, in its sole and absolute discretion, to be incompetent or to act in a disord erly or improper manner, such person shall be removed from the project immediately upon request b y the City, and such person shall not again be employed on the work. Such removal shall not be the basis for any claim of compensation or damages against the City.

In addition, Developer shall maintain an office wi th a telephone, and Developer or a person authorized to make decisions and to act on Developer’s behalf in Developer’s absence shall be available to be on the job within three (3) hours of being called at such office by the City, during the hours of 9:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or any other day or time when work is being perform ed on the Public Improvements. Developer shall also provide City with a telephone number, at which Developer, or its representative, shall be available twenty-four (24) hours a day in the event of an emergency.

3.0 Maintenance of Public Improvements and Landscap ing Prior to Acceptance by City. City shall not be responsible or liable for the maintenance or care of the Public Improvements until City approves and accepts them. City shall exercise no control over the Public Improvements until accepted. Any use by any person of the Public Improvements, or any portion thereof, shall be at the sole and exclusive risk of Developer at a ll times prior to City's acceptance of the Public Improvements. Developer shall maintain all the Public Improvements in a state of good repair until

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

5 they are completed by Developer and approved and accepted by City, and until the security for the performance of this Agreement is released.

Maintenance shall include, but shall not be limite d to: repair of pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, signals, parkways, water mains, and sewers; maintaining all landscaping in a vigorous and thriving condition reasonably acceptable to City; removal of debris from sewers and storm drains; and sweeping, repairing, and maintain ing in good and safe condition all streets and street improvements. Developer shall cause the sweeping of streets to occur weekly at a minimum.

Developer shall perform additional street sweeping work as necessary depending on construction activities or as required by, and at the direction of, the City Engineer. It shall be Developer’s responsibility to initiate all maintenance work, but if it shall fail to do so, it shall promptly perform such maintenance work when notified to do so by City. If Developer fails to properly prosecute its maintenance obligation under this Section, City may do all work necessary for such maintenance and the cost thereof shall be the responsibility of Developer and its surety under this Agreement.

City shall not be responsible or liable for any dam ages or injury of any nature in any way related to or caused by the Public Improvements or their condition prior to acceptance.

4.0 Construction Schedule. Unless extended pursuan t to this Section of this Agreement, Developer shall fully and adequately com plete or have completed the Public Improvements by December 3, 2025 or before any certificates of occupancy are issued for any lots within the Property, whichever is earlier. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the commencement of such work, Developer shall notify the City Engineer in writing of the date fixed by Developer for commencement of the work.

4.1 Extensions. Time is of the essence with regard to this Agreement. The City Council may, in its sole and absolute discretion, p rovide Developer with additional time within which to complete the Public Improvements. Requests for extension of time shall be in writing and shall be delivered to City in the manner herein after specified for service of notices. An extension of time, if any, shall be granted only in writing, and an oral extension shall not be valid or binding on City.

It is understood that by providing the security re quired by this Agreement, Developer and its surety consent in advance to any extension of time as may be given by City to Developer and waive any and all right to notice of such extension(s). Developer's acceptance of an extension of time granted by City shall constitu te a waiver by Developer and its surety of all defenses of laches, estoppel, statutes of limitations, and other limitations of action in any action or proceeding filed by City following the date on which the Public Improvements were to have been completed hereunder.

In addition, as consideration for granting such ex tension to Developer, City reserves the right to review the provisions of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the construction standards, the cost estimates approved by City, and the sufficiency of the improvement security provided by Developer, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted according to City's reasonable discretion.

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

6 4.2 Accrual of Limitations Period. Any limitations period provided by law related to breach of this Agreement or the terms th ereof shall not accrue until Developer has provided the City Engineer with written notice of D eveloper’s intent to abandon or otherwise not complete required or agreed upon Public Improvements.

5.0 Grading. Developer agrees that any and all gra ding done or to be done in conjunction with construction of the Public Improve ments or development of the Property shall conform to all federal, state, and local laws, ordi nances, regulations, and other requirements including, without limitation, City's grading regul ations, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES), and stormwater regulat ions thereunder as administered by the State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Wa ter Quality Control Boards. In order to prevent damage to the Public Improvements by improp er drainage or other hazards, the grading shall be completed in accordance with the time sche dule for completion of the Public Improvements established by this Agreement, and pri or to City's approval and acceptance of the Public Improvements and release of the Security as set forth in this Agreement. Developer further agrees that the indemnification as set forth in thi s Agreement shall extend to and include any and all grading contemplated by this Agreement, includi ng but not limited to, any partial or rough grading work.

6.0 Utilities. Developer shall assume all costs fo r and shall provide utility services, including water, power, gas, and telephone service to serve each parcel, lot, or unit of land within the Property in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations, including, but not limited to, the regulations, sch edules, and fees of the utilities or agencies providing such services. Except for commercial or i ndustrial properties, Developer shall also provide cable television facilities to serve each p arcel, lot, or unit of land in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, a nd regulations, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the cable company possessing a valid franchise with City to provide such service within City's jurisdictional limits. All utilities shall be installed underground, unless otherwise approved by the City Council or the Planning Commis sion of the City of Woodland, or by any other state or federal laws or regulations.

7.0 Fees and Charges. Developer shall, at its sole cost, expense, and liability, pay all fees, charges, and taxes arising out of construction of the Public Improvements, including, but not limited to fees for the checking, filing, and proce ssing of improvement plans and specifications and for inspecting the construction of the Public I mprovements. These fees must be paid in full prior to approval of the final map and improvement plans. The fees referred to above are not necessarily the only City fees, charges, or other c osts that have been or will be imposed on the subdivision and its development, and this Agreement shall in no way exonerate or relieve Developer from paying such other applicable fees, charges, and/or costs.

8.0 City Inspection of Public Improvements. Develo per shall, at its sole cost, expense, and liability, and at all times during construction of the Public Improvements, maintain reasonable

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

7 and safe facilities and provide safe access for ins pection by City of the Public Improvements and areas where construction of the Public Improvements is occurring or will occur.

9.0 Default; Notice; Remedies.

9.1 Notice. If Developer neglects, refuses, or fai ls to fulfill or timely complete any obligation, term, or condition of this Agreemen t, or if City determines there is a violation of any federal, state, or local law, ordinance, regula tion, code, standard, or other requirement, City may at any time thereafter declare Developer to be in default or violation of this Agreement and make written demand upon Developer or its surety, or both, to immediately remedy the default or violation (“Notice”). Developer shall substantiall y commence the work required to remedy the default or violation within ten (10) days of the No tice. If the default or violation constitutes an immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, City may provide the Notice verbally, and Developer shall substantially commence the required work within twenty-four (24) hours thereof.

Immediately upon City's issuance of the Notice, Developer and its surety shall be liable to City for all costs of construction and installation of the P ublic Improvements and all other administrative costs and expenses.

9.2 Failure to Remedy; City Action. If the work re quired to remedy the noticed default or violation is not diligently prosecuted to a completion acceptable to City within the time frame contained in the Notice, City may complete all remaining work, arrange for the completion of all remaining work, and/or conduct such remedial activity as in its sole and absolute discretion it believes is required to remedy the default or vi olation. All such work or remedial activity shall be at the sole and absolute cost, expense, and liab ility of Developer and its surety, without the necessity of giving any further notice to Developer or surety. City’s right to take such actions shall in no way be limited by the fact that Developer or its surety may have constructed any, or none, of the required or agreed upon Public Improvements at the time of City’s demand for performance.

In the event City elects to complete or arrange for completion of the remaining work and improvements, City may require all work by Develope r or its surety to cease in order to allow adequate coordination by City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if conditions precedent for reversion to acreage can be met and if the interest s of City will not be prejudiced thereby, City may also process a reversion to acreage and thereafter recover from Developer or its surety the full cost and expense incurred.

9.3 Other Remedies. No action by City pursuant to this Section of this Agreement shall prohibit City from exercising any o ther right or pursuing any other legal or equitable remedy available under this Agreement or any federal, state, or local law. City may exercise it rights and remedies independently or cu mulatively, and City may pursue inconsistent remedies. City may institute an action for damages, injunctive relief, or specific performance.

9.4 Administrative Costs. If Developer fails to co nstruct and install all or any part of the Public Improvements within the time required by this Agreement, or if Developer fails to comply with any other obligation contained herein, Developer and its surety shall be jointly and severally liable to City for all administrative exp enses, fees, and costs, including reasonable

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

8 attorney's fees and costs, incurred in obtaining co mpliance with this Agreement or in processing any legal action or for any other remedies permitted by law.

10.0 Acceptance of Improvements; As-Built or Record Drawings. If the Public Improvements are properly completed by Developer an d approved by the City Engineer, and if they comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, regulations, codes, standards, and other requirements, the City Council shall be authorized to accept the Public Improvements. The City Council may, in its sole and absolute discretion, accept fully completed portions of the Public Improvements prior to such t ime as all of the Public Improvements are complete, which shall not release or modify Develop er's obligation to complete the remainder of the Public Improvements within the time required by this Agreement. Upon the total or partial acceptance of the Public Improvements by City, the City Clerk shall file with the Recorder's Office of the County of Yolo, a notice of completion for the accepted Public Improvements in accordance with California Civil Code Section 9204, at which t ime the accepted Public Improvements shall become the sole and exclusive property of City without payment therefor.

Title to and ownership of the Public Improvements constructed under this Agreement shall vest absolutely in City upon completion and acceptance in writing of such Public Improvements by City.

Issuance by City of occupancy permits for any build ings or structures located on the Property shall not be construed in any manner t o constitute City's acceptance or approval of any Public Improvements. Notwithstanding the foreg oing, City may not accept any Public Improvements unless and until Developer provides one (1) set of “as-built” or record drawings or plans to the City Engineer for all such Public Impr ovements. The drawings shall be certified and shall reflect the condition of the Public Improveme nts as constructed, with all changes incorporated therein.

11.0 Security; Surety Bonds. Prior to execution of this Agreement, Developer shall provide City with surety bonds in the amounts and u nder the terms set forth below (“Security”).

Nothing in this Section is intended to prevent City, in its sole discretion, from requiring Developer to submit, or prevent Developer from submitting, security in a form other than bonds that may be allowed under California Government Code Section 66 499, et seq. and Chapter 21 of the Woodland Municipal Code, and acceptable to City. The amount of the Security shall be based on the City Engineer’s approximation of the actual cos t to construct the Public Improvements, including the replacement cost for all public landscaping (“Estimated Costs”). If City determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that the Estim ated Costs have changed, Developer shall adjust the Security in the amount requested by City. Developer's compliance with this Section shall in no way limit or modify Developer’s indemnification obligation under this Agreement.

11.1 Faithful Performance Bond. To guarantee the f aithful performance of the Public Improvements and all the provisions of this Agreement, to protect City if Developer is in default as set forth in Section 9.0, et seq ., of this Agreement, and to secure Developer’s one -year guarantee and warranty of the Public Improvements, including the maintenance of all landscaping

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

9 in a vigorous and thriving condition, Developer shall provide City a faithful performance bond in the amount of Four Million One Hundred Five Thousan d, Three Hundred Forty Dollars ($4,105,340.00), which sum shall be not less than one hundred perce nt (100%) of the Estimated Costs. The City may, in its sole and absolute discr etion, partially release a portion or portions of the security provided under this section as the Pub lic Improvements are accepted by City, as provided under Section 13.0 herein, provided that Developer is not in default on any provision of this Agreement or condition of approval for the Map , and the total remaining security is not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the Estimated Cos ts. All security provided under this section shall be released at the end of the Warranty period (as defined below), or any extension thereof as provided in Section 13.3 of this Agreement, provide d that Developer is not in default on any provision of this Agreement or condition of approval for the Map.

11.2 Labor and Material Bond. To secure payment to the contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material men and other persons furnishing labor, materials, or equipment for performance of the Public Improvements and this Agreement, Developer shall provide City a labor and materials bond in the amount of Two Million Fifty-Two Thousand Six Hundred Seventy Dollars ($2,052,670.00), which sum shall not be less than fifty percent (5 0%) of the Estimated Costs. The security provided under this subsection may be released by written authorization of the City Engineer after one (1) year or within the time limits established in California Government Code section 66499.7 from the date City accepts the final Public Improvements at the discretion of City. The amount of such security shall be reduced by the total of all stop notice or mechanic’s lien claims of which City is aware, plus an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of such claims for reimbursement of City’s anticipated administrat ive and legal expenses arising out of such claims.

11.3 Guarantee and Warranty Bond. Developer hereb y guarantees and warrants all Public Improvements against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials furnished in the performance of this Agreement, including the maintenance of all public landscaping within the Property in a vigorous and thriving condition reasonably acceptable to City, for a period of one (1) year following completion of the work and accep tance by City (“Warranty”). During the Warranty, Developer shall repair, replace, or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory portion of the Public Improvements, in accordance w ith the current ordinances, resolutions, regulations, codes, standards, or other requirement s of City, and to the approval of the City Engineer but shall not be responsible for routine maintenance after acceptance by City. All repairs, replacements, or reconstruction during the Warranty shall be at the sole cost, expense, and liability of Developer and its surety. As to any Public Impro vements that have been repaired, replaced, or reconstructed during the Warranty, Developer and its surety hereby agree to extend the Warranty for an additional one (1) year period following Cit y’s acceptance of the repaired, replaced, or reconstructed Public Improvements. Nothing herein s hall relieve Developer from any other liability it may have under federal, state, or loca l law to repair, replace, or reconstruct any Public Improvement following expiration of the Warranty or any extension thereof. Developer’s warranty obligation under this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

10 Prior to execution of this Agreement, Developer sh all provide City with an irrevocable guarantee and warranty bond in the amou nt of ten percent (10%) of the Estimated Costs of the Work to guarantee and warrant the Work , for a period of one year following its completion and acceptance, against any defective wo rk or labor done, or defective materials furnished, as required by California Government Code Section 66499.3(d). Any unused portion of the guarantee and warranty security shall be releas ed one year after acceptance of the required improvements by the City Council.

11.4 Additional Requirements. The surety for any s urety bonds provided as Security shall have a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VIII, shall be authorized to do business in the State of California, and shall be s atisfactory to City. As part of the obligation secured by the Security and in addition to the face amount of the Security, Developer or its surety shall secure the costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, incurred by City in enforcing the obligation s of this Agreement. Developer and its surety stipulate and agree that no change, extension of ti me, alteration, or addition to the terms of this Agreement, the Public Improvements, or the plans and specifications for the Public Improvements shall in any way affect its obligation on the Security.

11.5 Evidence and Incorporation of Security. Evide nce of the Security shall be provided on the forms set forth in Exhibit “C,” unl ess other forms are deemed acceptable by the City Engineer and the City Attorney, and when such forms are completed to the satisfaction of City, the forms and evidence of the Security shall be attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference.

12.0 Lien. To secure the timely performance of Dev eloper’s obligations under this Agreement, including those obligations for which se curity has been provided pursuant to this Agreement, Developer hereby creates in favor of Cit y a lien against all portions of the Property not dedicated to City or some other governmental agency for a public purpose. As to Developer’s default on those obligations for which security has been provided pursuant to this Agreement, City shall first attempt to collect against such securit y prior to exercising its rights as a contract lienholder under this Section.

13.0 Indemnification. Owner and Developer shall jo intly and severally defend (with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City Attorne y), indemnify, and hold harmless City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from any and all actual or alleged claims, demands, causes of action, liability, loss, damage, or injury, to property or persons, including wrongful death, whether imposed by a cour t of law or by administrative action of any federal, state, or local governmental body or agenc y, arising out of or incident to any acts, omissions, negligence, or willful misconduct of Dev eloper, its personnel, employees, agents, or contractors in connection with or arising out of co nstruction or maintenance of the Public Improvements, or performance of this Agreement. Thi s indemnification includes, without limitation, the payment of all penalties, fines, ju dgments, awards, decrees, attorneys’ fees, and related costs or expenses, and the reimbursement of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and/or agents for all legal expenses and costs incu rred by each of them. This indemnification

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

11 excludes only such portion of any claim, demand, cause of action, liability, loss, damage, penalty, fine, or injury, to property or persons, including wrongful death, which is caused solely and exclusively by the negligence or willful misconduct of City as determined by a court or administrative body of competent jurisdiction. Owne r’s and Developer’s obligation to indemnify shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement and shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Agency, its elected o fficials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.

14.0 Insurance.

14.1 Types; Amounts. Developer shall procure and m aintain, and shall require its contractors and subcontractors to procure and m aintain, during construction of any Public Improvement pursuant to this Agreement, insurance o f the types and in the amounts described below (“Required Insurance”) and without limiting the indemnity provisions of this Agreement. If any of the Required Insurance contains a general ag gregate limit, such insurance shall apply separately to this Agreement or be no less than thr ee times the specified occurrence limit. For purposes of this Section 14.0, et seq., the “indemn ified parties” shall mean City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunte ers, as described in this Agreement. The Required Insurance shall contain standard separatio n of insureds provisions, and shall contain no special limitations on the scope of its protection to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.

14.1.1 Commercial General Liability. Developer, it s contractors and subcontractors shall procure and maintain Commercia l General Liability Insurance that affords coverage at least as broad as the latest version of Insurance Services Office “occurrence” form CG 0001, with minimum limits of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, and if written with an aggregate, the aggregate shall be d ouble the per occurrence limit. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits. The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) products and completed op erations; (2) contractual liability; (3) third party action over claims; (4) cross liability exclu sion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (5) explosion, collapse, or underground hazard (XCU).

14.1.2 Automobile Liability. Developer and its con tractors and subcontractors shall procure and maintain automobile liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CA 0001 covering “Any Auto” (Symbol 1) and minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.000) each accident. Such insurance shall include coverage for the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading, or unloading of any vehicle owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by the insured or for which the insured is responsible. If Developer does not own any company vehicles and if requested by City, this requirement may be satisfied by providing a non-owned auto endorsement to the Commercial General Liability policy.

14.1.3 Workers’ Compensation. Developer, its contr actors and subcontractors shall procure and maintain workers’ compensation insurance with limits as required

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

12 by the Labor Code of the State of California and Em ployers’ Liability Insurance of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per accident for bodily injury and disease.

14.1.4 Professional Liability. If applicable to th is Agreement and required by City, for any consultant or other professional w ho will engineer or design the Public Improvements, professional liability insurance for errors and omissions with limits not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, shall be procured and maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the Public Improvements and shall specifically include all work to be performed under the Agreement. If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement, and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination of this Agreement.

14.2 Deductibles. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be approved by City in writing and shall protect the indemnifie d parties in the same manner and to the same extent as they would have been protected had the po licy or policies not contained a deductible or self-insured retention.

14.3 Certificates; Verification. Developer and its contractors and subcontractors shall furnish City with original certificates of in surance and endorsements effecting coverage for the Required Insurance. The certificates and endors ements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bi nd coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by City prior to the execution of this Agreement and before work pursuant to this Agreement can begin. C ity reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.

14.4 Insurer Rating. Unless approved in writing by City, the insurers for all Required Insurance shall have a current A.M. Best rating of at least A:VIII, shall be authorized to do business in the State of California, and shall be satisfactory to City.

14.5 Endorsements.

14.5.1 The Commercial General Liability, Automobile Liability, and Contractors Pollution Liability policies, if the la tter is required by City, shall be endorsed as follows:

Additional Insured: The indemnified parties shall be additional insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of this Agreement. The “Additional Insured Endorsement” shall be on a form similar to Insuranc e Services Office’s Endorsement form CG 2010 and contain no ot her modifications to the policy.

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

13 Primary Insurance: This insurance shall be primary and any other insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the indemnified parties shall not contribute with this primary insurance.

Severability: In the event one insured, whether named or additional, incurs liability to any other of the in sureds, whether named or additional, the policy shall cover the insured against whom the claim is made or may be made in the same manner as if separate policies had been issued to each insured, except th at the limits of insurance shall not be increased thereby.

Cancellation: The policy shall not be canceled or the coverage suspended, voided, reduced, or allowed to expire un til a thirty (30) day prior written notice of cancellation has been s erved upon City, except ten (10) days prior written notice shall be allowed for non- payment of premium.

Duties: Any failure by the named insured to comply with r eport provisions of the policy or breaches or violations of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the indemnified parties.

Applicability: That the coverage provided therein shall apply to the obligations assumed by Developer, its contractors or subcontractors under the indemnity provisions of this Agreement, unless the policy or policies contain a blanket form of contractual liability coverage.

14.5.2 The Workers’ Compensation policy or policies required by this Agreement shall be endorsed as follows:

Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against th e indemnified parties.

Cancellation: The policy shall not be canceled or the coverage suspended, voided, reduced, or allowed to expire un til a thirty (30) day prior written notice of cancellation has been s erved upon City, except ten (10) days prior written notice shall be allowed for non- payment of premium.

14.5.3 The Professional Liability policy or policie s required by this Agreement, if required by City, shall be endorsed as follows:

Cancellation: The policy shall not be canceled or the coverage suspended, voided, reduced, or allowed to expire un til a thirty (30)

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

14 day prior written notice of cancellation has been s erved upon City, except ten (10) days prior written notice shall be allowed for non- payment of premium.

15.0 Signs and Advertising. Developer understands and agrees to City's ordinances, regulations, and requirements governing signs and advertising structures. Developer hereby agrees with and consents to the removal by City of all signs or other advertising structures erected, placed, or situated in violation of any City ordinance, reg ulation, or other requirement. Removal shall be at the expense of Developer. Developer shall indemnify and hold City free and harmless from any claim or demand arising out of or incident to signs, advertising structures, or their removal.

16.0 Relationship Between the Parties. The Parties hereby mutually agree that neither this Agreement, any map related to the Property, no r any other related entitlement, permit, or approval issued by City for the Property shall operate to create the relationship of partnership, joint venture, or agency between City and Developer or Ci ty and Owner. Developer’s contractors and subcontractors are exclusively and solely under the control and dominion of Developer. Nothing herein shall be deemed to make Developer, its contr actors, or its subcontractors an agent, contractor, or subcontractor of City.

17.0 General Provisions.

17.1 Authority to Enter Agreement. Each Party warr ants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

17.2 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate, or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

17.3 Construction; References; Captions. It being agreed the Parties or their agents have participated in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days, or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Developer include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Developer, except as otherwise specified in this Ag reement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.

17.4 Notices. All notices, demands, invoices, and written communications shall be in writing and delivered to the following addres ses or such other addresses as the Parties may designate by written notice:

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

15 CITY:

City of Woodland
300 First Street
Woodland, CA 95695
Attn: City Engineer
DEVELOPER:

Lennar Homes of California, LLC
1025 Creekside Ridge, Suite #240
Roseville, CA 95678
Attn: Division President
OWNER:

AG EHC II (LEN) CA 2, L.P.
8585 E. Hartford Dr, Suite118
Scottsdale, AZ 85255

A copy of any notice sent to the owner, AG EHC II (LEN) CA 2, L.P., shall be sent to the following address:

Quarles & Brady LLP
Two North Central Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Attn: Jason F. Wood

Depending upon the method of transmittal, notice sh all be deemed received as follows: by facsimile, as of the date and time sent; by messeng er, as of the date delivered; and by U.S. Mail first class postage prepaid, as of seventy-two (72) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail.

17.5 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modif ication, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

17.6 Waiver. City’s failure to insist upon strict compliance with any provision of this Agreement or to exercise any right or privi lege provided herein, or City’s waiver of any breach of this Agreement, shall not relieve Develop er of any of its obligations under this Agreement, whether of the same or similar type. The foregoing shall be true whether City’s actions are intentional or unintentional. Developer agrees to waive, as a defense, counterclaim or set off, any and all defects, irregularities or deficiencies in the authorization, execution or performance of the Public Improvements or this Agreement, as well as the laws, rules, regulations, ordinances or resolutions of City with regards to the authorizati on, execution, or performance of the Public Improvements or this Agreement.

17.7 Assignment or Transfer of Agreement. Develope r shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by ope ration of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignee, hypothecatee, or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation, or transfer. Unless spec ifically stated to the contrary in City's written consent, any assignment, hypothecation, or transfer shall not release or discharge Developer from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. In the event that City consents in writing to such an assignment, any assignee, hypothecatee, or trans feree shall expressly assume Developer’s

Subdivision Improvement Agreement
SM# 5221 – Ruby Estates Subdivision

16 obligations hereunder by a written agreement in a f orm, and containing such security, as is reasonably acceptable to City.

The agreement, hypothecation, or transfer shall be to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and shall include provisions requiring the assignee to post bonds or submit another form of financial security, satisfactory to City and app roved by the City Attorney, to guarantee construction of the Public Improvements. The agreement shall survive the recordation of the Final Map and shall be recorded against each of the propo sed lots to inform successors and assigns of the required Public Improvements to be constructed and their time frame for construction.

Following any permitted assignment, hypothecation, or transfer of the Public Improvements as set forth in this Section, City sha ll release Developer from its obligations so assigned and shall release to Developer any bonds o r other security posted to secure the Public Improvements so assigned; provided, however, that C ity shall not release any security or undertakings given to secure the performance of any of the Public Improvements not assigned, hypothecated, or transferred.

17.8 Binding Effect. Each and all of the covenants and conditions shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the Pa rties, and their successors, heirs, personal representatives, or assigns. This Section shall not be construed as an authorization for any Party to assign any right or obligation.

17.9 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. There are no in tended third-party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

17.10 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a c ourt of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

17.11 Consent to Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agre ement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. Any legal action or proceeding brought to interpret or enforce this Agreement, or which in any way arises out of the Parties’ activities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement, shall be fil ed and prosecuted in the appropriate California State Court in the County of Yolo, California. Each Party waives the benefit of any provision of state or federal law providing for a change of venue to a ny other court or jurisdiction including, without limitation, a change of venue based on the fact tha t a governmental entity is a party to the action or proceeding, or that a federal right or question is involved or alleged to be involved in the action or proceeding. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing waiver, Developer expressly waives any right to have venue transferred pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 394.

17.12 Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. If any arbitratio n, lawsuit, or other legal action or proceeding is brought by one Party against the othe r Party in connection with this Agreement or the Property, the prevailing party, whether by final judgment or arbitration award, shall be entitled to and recover from the other party all costs and expenses incurred by the prevailing party, including actual