A P P E N D I X E. P ROJ E C T
EXPERIENCE
FINAL DESIGN OF THE YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
AND SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECTS
City of Yorba Linda
MARK THOMAS
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Mark Thomas has planned, designed and managed a wide variety of State- and federally-funded capital improvement projects for public agencies. Projects have included roadway widenings and reconstruction, pavement rehabilitation, drainage facilities, intersection improvements, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, active transportation facilities, and utility coordination/relocation. We are proud of our track record of successfully completing projects and meeting the needs of our clients. Below is a list of our projects similar to the City’s project. We are confident that you will find that the highlighted projects demonstrate our ability to deliver the service you are seeking on similar type projects.
CLIENT
Cities of Yorba Linda and Anaheim
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
2019-2021
SERVICES
• Arterial Street Widening
• Intersection Widenings
• Bicycle Facilities
• Grading/Retaining Walls
• Impacted Utilities
KEY STAFF
Pat Somerville
Kimberly Barling
Deborah Pracilio
Blake Selna
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING PR/ED*
YORBA LINDA
The cities of Yorba Linda and Anaheim are proposing improvements to alleviate the heavy congestion along Yorba Linda Boulevard, particularly during the afternoon peak hours. This includes the addition of a fourth northbound lane between the SR-91 and La Palma Avenue. Three intersections at La Palma Avenue, Savi Ranch Parkway and Santa Ana Canyon, were also widening to provide additional turning capacity and storage to address queuing.
These improvements also promote active transportation and alternative modes of travel through the corridor, with a protected bike and pedestrian pathway that links Savi Ranch to the regional trails. With these improvements, residents and commuters will experience a better quality of life. Under the guidance of Pat Somerville as project manager and Kimberly Barling as project engineer, a PR/ED was prepared to evaluate geometric alternatives and identify utility impacts. A preliminary Water Quality Master Plan (WQMP) and structures advance planning study was prepared for the widening of the bridge over the Santa Ana River. LSA prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), which was approved in January 2021.
Funding was also secured through the OCTA Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program (CTFP) for both the PR/ED as well as the next phase of the project, the preparation of the PS&E documents.
* Key Staff’s Personal Experience
FINAL DESIGN OF THE YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
AND SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECTS
City of Yorba Linda
MARK THOMAS
CLIENT
City of Yorba Linda
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
2019-2021
SERVICES
• Roadway Widening
• Retaining Walls
• OCTA CTFP Funding
• Traffic Signal Modifications
• Staging & Traffic Handling
KEY STAFF
Pat Somerville
Kimberly Barling
Deborah Pracilio
Arthur Black
SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING*
YORBA LINDA
Under the guidance of Pat Somerville as project manager, a Savi Ranch Mobility Feasibility Study was prepared that identified improvements that would reduce the congestion along Savi Ranch Parkway. These improvements included the addition of a westbound lane from Mirage Street to Yorba Linda Boulevard and adding a third westbound left turn lane.
The project will eliminate a free right and yield right turn lanes to improve operations and safety. A retaining wall is required adjacent to Staples/ PetSmart due to the widening. Sidewalk will be added on Mirage Street, closing gaps in the existing sidewalk network.
35% project plans were prepared in the initial phase of work and were reviewed by the cities of Yorba Linda and Anaheim. These were developed to minimize throwaway costs if Savi Ranch Parkway is constructed ahead of the Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening.
Additional services included assisting the City in obtaining approval from OCTA to add Savi Ranch Parkway onto the Master Plan of Arterial Highways and making it available for OCTA grant funding. Justification and presentation materials were prepared, and this effort was successful.
Subsequently, with Savi Ranch Parkway now on the MPAH, Mark Thomas successfully prepared the OCTA CTFP Intersection Capacity Enhancement application to fund the final design phase of the project. * Key Staff’s Personal Experience
FINAL DESIGN OF THE YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
AND SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECTS
City of Yorba Linda
MARK THOMAS
CLIENT
City of Orange
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
2022 - Present
FEE
$762,093
KEY STAFF
Pat Somerville
Alan Su
Josh Cosper
Marshall Moore
Steve Heise
Deborah Pracilio
Blake Snell
CANNON STREET WIDENING
CITY OF ORANGE
Mark Thomas is providing preliminary engineering,
environmental clearance, and final design for the
widening of Cannon Street from Santiago Canyon
Road to Serrano Avenue. The project will provide one
additional northbound lane to address the heavy
afternoon peak hour traffic that is bypassing the
SR-55 and SR-91 freeways.
Services include the geometric alternatives to
accommodate the widening within the existing right
of way, preparation of an IS/MND, and final PS&E
preparation. Alternatives will be evaluated to widen
the bridge to accommodate the added lane as well
as Class II bike lanes and pedestrian sidewalk while
minimizing impact to the Santiago Creek. Pedestrians
may be accommodated on a separate prefabricated
pedestrian bridge to avoid encroachment into the
creek. A new raised landscape median will be included
throughout the length of the project. Field survey and
geotechnical investigations are being provided.
The project was funded through the OCTA
Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program
(CTFP), in the Arterial Capacity Enhancement category.
OC LOOP, SEGMENT D
ORANGE COUNTY
Mark Thomas is providing PS&E for the design of
Carbon Canyon Channel Bikeway (OC Loop Segment
D) within the Cities of Brea, Placentia and Yorba Linda.
This project will connect the existing trail at Imperial Highway and La Floresta to the existing portion of El
Cajon trail at Bastanchury Road. The project includes a 12’-14’-wide bikeway, undercrossing at Golden Avenue,
a 133’-long 12’ x 12.5’ box culvert undercrossing at
Bastanchury Road, constructing permanent retaining
walls, drainage conveyance, lighting, fencing, landscape, irrigation, hardscape, ADA access, bicycle/pedestrian
signals and beacons, street crossings, maintenance
road access, signage, pervious pavement and localized
stormwater best management practices (BMP’s).
The Mark Thomas team improved geometrics to reduce
the length of the undercrossing at Bastanchury Road
and value engineered a cost effective sheet pile wall
system that will reduce construction noise, minimize
right of way impacts and accelerate construction while
saving the County over $6 million in construction
cost. The OC Loop, when completed, will be a 66-mile
bikeway of seamless connections and opportunities for
people to bike,walk and connect to Orange County’s
scenic resources.
CLIENT
Orange County
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
2019 - Present
FEE
$637,049
KEY STAFF
Ravi Shah
Marty Armstrong
Marshall Moore
Julie Passalacqua
Bobby Lin
Xavier Espinosa
SERVICES
• Bicycle Facilities
• Stormwater BMPs
• Geometrics
• Landscape Services
• OCFCD & USACE Permitting
SERVICES
• Geometric Refinement
• Bridge Widening over
Waterway
• OCFCD Coordination
• Regulatory Permitting
• Bicycle Facilities
• Staging and Traffic
Handling
FINAL DESIGN OF THE YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
AND SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECTS
City of Yorba Linda
MARK THOMAS
CLIENT
Orange County
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
2018-2021
FEE
$2,102,798
KEY STAFF
Pat Somerville
Bo Burick
Josh Cosper
Flora Diaz
Julie Passalacqua
Ravi Shah
BREA CANYON ROAD WIDENING
ORANGE COUNTY
Mark Thomas recently delivered the PS&E, geometric
design, and retaining wall and bridge design for
the widening of nearly two miles of Brea Canyon
Boulevard from Canyondale Drive to the Orange
County/Los Angeles County boundary line, and the
replacement of three bridges. This $51 million project
was delivered on an accelerated schedule due to
funding requirements. 100% PS&E was developed in
nine months to meet these funding deadlines.
The project improvements include: widening the
existing undivided two-lane roadway to a four-lane
divided roadway; replacing the three existing bridges
over the Brea Canyon Channel; rehabilitating the
existing unlined channel; constructing permanent
retaining walls up to 65-feet-high; and replacing the
traffic signal at Canyon Country Road. Extensive utility coordination and relocation was required.
The project also requires complex construction
staging to keep the roadway in operation during
construction, as it is a reliever route for SR-57. All
three bridges are proposed to be constructed in two
stages.
FIRESTONE BOULEVARD WIDENING
NORWALK
Mark Thomas is prepared the PA&ED and is completing
the PS&E for the Firestone Boulevard Widening
Project. Firestone Boulevard serves as an important
truck route between I-5 and I-605, connecting multiple
communities. The corridor carries significant traffic
volumes between 35,000 and 40,000 vehicles a day,
including 15% truck traffic.
The widening of Firestone Boulevard will provide
for a six-lane divided arterial, construct multimodal
improvements for bicycles and pedestrians while
maintaining existing on-street parking, and widen
the UPRR overhead bridge. The project will also
be constructed in phases to minimize impacts to
businesses, including luxury auto sales. Additionally,
the project included modifications to four traffic signals and landscape/complete street improvements to the
entire segment through two phases of improvements.
Mark Thomas also provided value engineering
efforts that resulted in a reduction of right of way
impacts, saving the City over $250,000 of potential
acquisition. Mark Thomas was also responsible for all
utility relocation coordination for more than ten utility owners within the Project limits. Currently Mark Thomas is finalizing PS&E efforts with the intent to advertise this project for construction by the end of 2022.
CLIENT
City of Norwalk
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
2019-2022
FEE
$818,970
KEY STAFF
Pat Somerville
Flora Diaz
Xavier Espinosa
Bobby Lin
Marty Armstrong
Kimberley Barling
SERVICES
• Roadway Widening
• Utility Relocation
• Geometrics
• OCFCD & USACE Permitting
SERVICES
• Roadway Widening
• Water Quality Improvements
• Utility Relocation
• Structures/Bridge Design
FINAL DESIGN OF THE YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
AND SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECTS
City of Yorba Linda
MARK THOMAS
CLIENT
OCTA
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
2020-Ongoing
FEE
$xx
KEY STAFF
John McCarthy
Howard Barndt
Deborah Pracilio
Blake Snell
SR-91 EASTBOUND WIDENING –
SANTA ANA RIVER HYDRAULIC
AND SCOUR ANALYSIS
ORANGE COUNTY
Q3 and LSA provided services on the widening of
the SR-91 freeway over the Santa Ana River. The
Santa Ana River is a major regional flood control
channel which was constructed by the USACE and
is owned and maintained by the County of Orange.
Q3 prepared a hydraulic modeling of the river
for pre- and post-project conditions along with a
scour analysis to support the final design of the
bridge structure and provided hydraulic and scour
engineering for the preparation of the Final Hydraulic
Report. Q3 is the lead for the processing of the 408
permit from the USACE and the encroachment permit
from Orange County Public Works.
LSA has prepared applications and obtained a Section
404 Permit from USACE, 401 Certification from the
SWRCB, and 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement
from CDFW to perform geotechnical borings. LSA
assisted in the application for the Section 408 Permit
and monitored for nesting birds and impacts to bats
while the borings were being conducted. LSA will be
preparing environmental re-validation to address
changes in project design that occur during PS&E and
incorporate permit conditions and measures.
“All Things Stormwater”
• FHWA and Caltrans Criteria
Looking upstream along the Santa Ana River to the SR-91 Freeway crossing
SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
(SARI) LINE, ORANGE COUNTY
The SARI Line is a regional sanitary sewer that
conveys raw sewage and brine (wastewater from
agriculture, commercial and other sources) from the
Inland Empire and Orange County to the Orange
County Sanitation District (OCSD) treatment plant in
Fountain Valley. The SARI Line has experienced heavy
erosion of the sediment cover ,exposing the pipeline
at several locations. Leighton’s field exploration for
this long alignment included more than 75 borings
and installation of groundwater monitoring wells to
monitor seasonal fluctuations in groundwater levels
(with wide variations due to releases from Prado Dam).
Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI) was used to evaluate location of the Whittier-Elsinore Fault. This ERI process is a nondestructive geophysical technique for imaging
subsurface structures from electrical measurements
by means of injection of DC current in the ground,
measuring the voltage drops produced at points on
the surface and mapping subsurface distribution of
electrical resistivity to build a three-dimensional model of the site. Leighton prepared a Geotechnical Data
Report (GDR), Geotechnical Interpretive Report (GIR),
and Geotechnical Baseline Report.
CLIENT
Orange County Sanitation
Department c/o Tetra Tech
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
2009 - 2013
FEE
$1,200,000
KEY STAFF
Djan Chandra
Joe Roe
SERVICES
• Santa Ana River
• Hydraulic Modeling
• Bridge Scour
• OCFCD Coordination
• Regulatory Permitting
SERVICES
• OCFCD and USACE Involvement
• Geotechnical Exploration
A P P E N D I X F.
REPORT SAMPLES
City of Yorba Linda
Savi Ranch Parkway Widening
Final Design Services
Progress Report
Period: Date/Month to Date/Month
1. Work Performed This Month:
• Bulleted List
2. Work to be Performed Next Month
• Bulleted List
3. Issues/Concerns:
• Discussion
4. Project Financials: See Attached Breakdown
• Discussion
5. Schedule Update: See Attached Schedule
• Discussion
Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
MARK THOMAS
Pat Somerville
Project Manager
File No: 22-00016
Savi Ranch Parkway Widening
Final Design Services
Project Financials:
Period: Date/Month to Date/Month
File No: 22-00016
December 21, 2021 File No. 21-00016
Invoice No. 42326
Rick Yee
City of Yorba Linda
4845 Casa Loma Avenue
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
RE: ON-CALL CONSULTING SERVICES; SAVI RANCH PARKWAY – OCTA ICE FUNDING APPLICATION – TASK ORDER NO. 1; PO# 21220609; PROJECT #: E-SI211001
Enclosed is our invoice for services through November 28, 2021 for your review and approval to process for payment.
Tasks Completed through November:
• Responded to OCTA inquiries
• Provided updated cost estimate in OCTA Form 10-3 format Anticipated Tasks for December:
• Respond to any OCTA comments or questions on the application Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
MARK THOMAS
Pat Somerville
Project Manager
Rick Yee, Assistant City Engineer SUMMARY 12/21/21
City of Yorba Linda File No. 21-00016
4845 Casa Loma Avenue
Yorba Linda, CA 92886 Re:
Invoice # 42326
Contract Exp 06/30/24
Engineering Services: Through November 28, 2021
Original 18,460
Total Contract Amount 18,460
PHASE TASK ORIGINAL REALLOCATED PREVIOUSLY BILLED COSTS BALANCE BILLED NO. NO. PHASE/TASK DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET BILLED THIS PERIOD TO DATE REMAINING BUDGET 100 OCTA CTFP ICE - APPLICATION PREP
001 Prepare ICE Application 14,350.00 14,350.00 14,018.26 304.26 14,322.52 27.48 100% 002 Traffic: Analysis & Narrative 760.00 760.00 0.00 305.15 305.15 454.85 40% 099 MT REIMBURSABLES 300.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0% 100 LSA: TRAFFIC: DATA COLLECTION 1,050.00 2,140.00 0.00 2,140.00 2,140.00 0.00 100% 101 LSA: TRAFFIC: ANALYSIS/NARRATIVE 2,000.00 910.00 0.00 760.00 760.00 150.00 84%
SUBTOTAL PHASE 100 18,460.00 18,460.00 14,018.26 3,509.41 17,527.67 932.33 95% GRAND TOTAL SERVICES 18,460.00 18,460.00 14,018.26 3,509.41 17,527.67 932.33 95% On-Call Consulting Services; Savi Ranch Parkway
OCTA ICE Funding Application; TO #1; PO
#21220609; Project #E-SI211001
Rick Yee
City of Yorba Linda
4845 Casa Loma Avenue
Yorba Linda, California 92886
December 21, 2021
Project No: 21-00016
Invoice No: 42326
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
2833 Junction Avenue, Suite 110
San Jose, CA 95134
Phone (408) 453-5373 * Fax (408) 453-5390
Project 21-00016 On-Call Consultant Services; Savi Ranch Parkway- 2022 OCTA CTFP Funding Application Preparation; Task Order No. 1; PO# 21220609; Project #: E-SI211001
Professional Services through November 28, 2021
Phase 100 OCTA CTFP ICE - APPLICATION PREP
Task 001 Prepare ICE Application
Professional Personnel
Hours Rate Amount
Sr. Engineering Manager
Somerville, Patrick .50 436.47 218.24
Project Coordinator
Navarro, Shelby .75 114.69 86.02
Totals 1.25 304.26
Total Labor 304.26
Total this Task $304.26
Task 002 Traffic: Analysis & Narrative
Professional Personnel
Hours Rate Amount
Sr. Engineering Manager
Somerville, Patrick .50 436.47 218.24
Project Accountant
Fall, Ndeye .50 116.47 58.24
Project Coordinator
Navarro, Shelby .25 114.69 28.67
Totals 1.25 305.15
Total Labor 305.15
Total this Task $305.15
Task 100 LSA: TRAFFIC: DATA COLLECTION
Consultants
LSA Associates, Inc.
11/30/2021 LSA Associates, Inc. Invoice #180024 2,140.00 Total Consultants 2,140.00 2,140.00
Total this Task $2,140.00
Task 101 LSA: TRAFFIC: ANALYSIS & NARRATIVE
Project 21-00016 Yorba Linda- Savi Ranch OCTA ICE App Invoice 42326 Consultants
LSA Associates, Inc.
11/30/2021 LSA Associates, Inc. Invoice #180024 760.00
Total Consultants 760.00 760.00
Total this Task $760.00
Total this Phase $3,509.41
Total this Invoice $3,509.41
Outstanding Invoices
Number Date Balance
41793 10/29/2021 4,590.17
41951 11/15/2021 9,428.09
Total 14,018.26
A P P E N D I X G .
SCOPE OF WORK
Revised 10/24/2022 Page 346 of 389
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING
TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS
It is assumed that the Savi Ranch Parkway project will be completed in nine months with bid ready documents and completion of legal descriptions and plats. If funding is not available at that time, the project would be shelved until such time as funding becomes available for right of way and construction.
1.1 Meetings
A project kickoff meeting will be conducted to confirm the Scope of Services and design parameters. PDT meetings will be conducted monthly throughout the duration of the project to track the overall project and facilitate the flow of information between the City, CONSULTANT, City of Anaheim, and all other stakeholders. Additional as-needed meetings will be held to address specific concerns. Agendas and meeting minutes will be generated for each meeting.
1.2 City & Community Meetings:
CONSULTANT shall participate in meetings with the City at the following potential meetings for Savi Ranch Parkway:
• City Traffic Commission (1 meeting)
• City Planning Commission (1 meeting, Yorba Linda)
• City Council Meeting (1 meeting, Yorba Linda)
• Task includes the preparation of exhibits, presentations, and responding to community input.
1.3 Community Meetings:
CONSULTANT shall participate in meetings as necessary with impacted property owners (4 meetings). Task includes the preparation of exhibits, presentations, and responding to community input. Comments/concerns will be tracked in an overall project matrix along with responses, action and status.
1.4 Third Party Coordination:
CONSULTANT will provide coordination with other Project stakeholders as required including, but not limited to, Caltrans, City of Anaheim, OC Parks, OC Flood, OCTA, Fish and Wildlife, The State Water Resources Control Board, and United States Army Corps of Engineers. CONSULTANT will be required to address any submittal comments received from third party agencies. Comments/concerns will be tracked in an overall project matrix along with responses, action and status.
1.5 Progress Reporting:
CONSULTANT will supervise, coordinate, monitor and review the project for conformance with standards, policies, and procedures. Monthly progress reports will also be provided to document the progress on the project.
1.6 Project Management Plan (PMP):
The PMP shall include, but not be limited to:
• Introduction: background, objectives, approach, etc.
• Project organization: key personnel, project manager, and discipline leader’s responsibilities and contact information
• Scope of work & contract document: scope, approach, prime contract, and subcontract documents • Project design procedures: design standards and criteria, report and drawing list, specification list, design reviews
• Project administrative procedures: filing system, communication protocol, etc. • Project budget, fee schedule and invoicing
• Prevailing wage rates
• City’s RFP
• Proposer’s proposal
• Professional Services Agreement
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
• Change orders
• Post-project procedures
• Quality Management Plan (QMP)
• Any other related project information
TASK 1 DELIVERABLES
• Project Management Plan (3 copies due at the kick-off meeting) • Meeting notices, agendas, handouts, minutes, monthly Invoices • Updated project schedule due at the kick-off meeting and maintained throughout the project • Monthly progress reports to accompany each monthly invoice (12 total) • Monthly Progress meetings with staff (12 meetings total) • Public Meetings with City Council, commission, property owner, etc. as noted above (3 meetings total) TASK 2: PERMITTING
CONSULTANT must secure all necessary regulatory permits, including but not limited to, Caltrans, County of Orange and City of Anaheim encroachment permits, etc. For Savi Ranch Parkway, it is expected that the permits are limited to water quality NPDES and City of Yorba Linda encroachment permits.
The CONSULTANT shall list in the proposal all anticipated permits necessary for the successful delivery of the project.
CONSULTANT shall obtain preliminary approval from applicable regulatory agencies at the initial design phase.
Consultant shall identify in their proposal when the submittal to the appropriate agency will occur and include this in the project schedule.
CONSULTANT shall provide an estimate of the required permit costs for all regulatory and encroachment permits for all agencies involved in this project. It is assumed that the City of Yorba Linda will issue a no-fee encroachment permit.
TASK 2 DELIVERABLES:
• Coordinate and complete all administrative work necessary to obtain related permits TASK 3: BASELINE DATA COLLECTION
The following information will be provided by the City. • Aerial Topography (AutoCAD 2016 format)
• Orthorectified Aerial Photograph
• Utility notifications, responses, and facility maps or record drawings
3.1 Data Collection:
Existing and readily available data will be assembled from the City and other Agencies, including improvement plans, drainage reports, geotechnical data, As-Built drawings, other reports, traffic data, agreements, assessor parcel data, tract and parcel maps, and right of way information.
3.2 Utility Potholing:
In the CONSULTANT’s proposed fee schedule, the CONSULTANT must provide an allowance, for potholing of utilities and related costs, including other agency costs, and of any proposed locations of new improvements such as traffic signal foundations. Locations must be based on information received from utility investigations and the design plans showing proposed traffic signal poles. CONSULTANT must confirm with the City whether utilities must be marked prior to or after the design topographical survey. Pothole locations and depths will be marked on the pavement surface and will show both horizontal location and depth from surface to the utility. Compensation will be based on the unit price for each pothole as listed in the fee schedule but may not exceed the allowance. Such unit price shall include all necessary efforts related to this item, including traffic control. From the utility research and utility potholing, CONSULTANT will compile and incorporate utility information on the roadway Base Sheets. Conflicts with existing utilities will be identified for resolution with the conflicting utility. Pothole locations must be backfilled with a permanent cement-type material (for Anaheim pothole restoration, must follow City of Anaheim Standard No. 132 and
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
any other applicable Anaheim standards), to be approved by the appropriate City’s Public Works Superintendent.
Provide a summary report of findings as the deliverable for this item.
A total of 2 potholes have been included for this effort.
3.3 Geotechnical Investigation and Reporting
3.3.1 Field investigations
• Review of available pertinent, published geotechnical literature and maps • Site reconnaissance of the existing onsite geologic/geotechnical conditions and mapping of the site • Public utility clearance (USA)
• Subsurface soil sampling and boring by a geologist. Proposer to provide a preliminary plan showing proposed locations of pits and depths for City review and approval prior to initiating field work. Drill, sample and log two hollow-stem auger borings to a depth of 50 feet or auger refusal, whichever is shallower, for design of the proposed retaining wall and pavement. Borings will be located within public right of way. • Comply with Water Quality NPDES requirements
3.3.2 Geotechnical Analysis
• Geotechnical laboratory testing of representative soil samples obtained. Geotechnical testing including:
Atterberg Limits, maximum density/optimum moisture content, direct shear testing, expansion index testing, corrosion testing (soluble sulfate, pH, chlorides, and minimum resistivity testing), and R-value testing. Limited laboratory testing to support our field observations and provide engineering properties for analyses • Prepare final drill logs and map for inclusion in geotechnical summary report • Geologic analyses of findings made during field exploration • Slope stability is included for the proposed fill slope, retaining walls, and abutment slopes • An evaluation of faulting and seismicity of the region, and the possible impact of regional seismicity on the site and the proposed construction
3.3.3 Summary Report
• Analysis of the geotechnical data obtained from the field reconnaissance and laboratory testing • Includes geologic summary of constraints identified during our investigation • Includes recommendations for corrosion protection and mitigation of steel and concrete as required, feasible foundation type and design parameter, retaining wall and shoring design parameter, earthwork and grading criteria, pavement section, and general geotechnical conditions, based on our investigation • Map showing exploration and potential constraints
• Other content and formats as required by the City
Assumptions:
1. Field exploration can be performed during normal weekdays (Monday – Friday) between 7 am and 5 pm.
2. The borings can be backfilled with soil cutting mixed with cement and patched with cold-mix asphalt where asphalt is penetrated.
3. Identification, handling, and treatment of materials that need to be environmentally addressed are beyond the scope of our geotechnical engineering services. If such materials are encountered, we will notify you immediately and a proposal for handling of such materials will be submitted upon request.
3.4 Utility Coordination
Existing utility information will be mapped on the project base map and determine potential conflicts with proposed improvements. The CONSULTANT shall conduct initial meetings with those utility companies that are potentially in conflict. CONSULTANT shall prepare draft notifications to all utility companies known to operate within the project area
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
to identify the type and locations of utilities for the project. The City will send said notification on City letterhead and provide CONSULTANT with responses.
• Develop provisions to accommodate existing and new utility facilities (e.g., maintained in place, removed, adjusted, abandoned, or installed).
• Effectively identify utility locations and resolve conflicts on proposed plans to keep project on schedule.
Prepare Utility Conflict Sheet to summarize conflict and resolution. • Notify responsible utility owner of necessary facility relocation or adjustment. • Significant utility impacts shall be reflected to the project schedule and coordinate to not conflict with other items of construction work.
3.5 Survey Control
3.5.1 Survey Control, Design Survey and Right of Way/LandNet Mapping CONSULTANT will perform a field survey to establish the control necessary for the project area. Project horizontal control (NAD83) and vertical control (NAVD88) will be established based upon GPS ties to the CSRC network, California Coordinate System 1983 (CCS83), Zone VI, Epoch 2017.5 for horizontal and vertical. Additional local benchmarks from the Orange County Geodetic Control will also be verified, for elevation control and confirmation. CONSULTANT will include control points in the Electronic Base Map which will include coordinates and elevations used for each point.
CONSULTANT will perform field survey to collect record centerline and detailed topographic data within the project limits for the portion of Savi Ranch Parkway westerly of Mirage Street and the westerly half of Mirage Street between Crystal Drive and Old Canal Road.
Right of way and property boundary lines as established will be shown on the topographic map with ties to sufficient survey monuments as field located and verified.
Surveys performed by CONSULTANT shall conform to the requirements of the Land Surveyors Act and Caltrans Surveys Manual. In accordance with the Act, "responsible charge" for the work shall reside with a pre-January 1, 1982, Registered Civil Engineer, or a Licensed Land Surveyor, in the State of California.
Mark Thomas will Research existing record maps and right of way documents, review Preliminary Title Reports for easements and rights, field locate and verify some existing record survey monuments, analysis all field data and record documents to prepare the project base map and LandNet for use through design and requirement phases for parcels that will require a permanent acquisition.
DELIVERABLES
• Project Topographic Base Map derived from field data (AutoCAD Civil 3D 2019 or later) • Survey Control Report – for horizontal and vertical control • Survey field notes and site photos
• Preliminary Title Reports (2)
• Right of Way Mapping
3.6 Right of Way Mapping and Engineering
Obtain existing Parcel Maps, Tract Maps and Preliminary Title Reports for parcels on either side of Savi Ranch Parkway.
Map right of way, parcel lines, and easements on the project base map. CONSULTANT must identify right of way impacts associated with the project. Existing right of way lines will be identified on the engineering plans. Obtain Right of Way Certification summarizing the status of all right of way related matters pertaining to a proposed construction project.
CONSULTANT will check and review for accuracy existing and proposed all recorded property legal instruments such as, but not limited to, survey documentation and title reports, lot and boundary closure, dedications and easement provisions, legal descriptions, completeness and accuracy of data notation, and necessary certifications of City staff.
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
CONSULTANT shall support the City in its right of way acquisition efforts including, but not limited to, surveying, determination of right-of- way areas, preparation of legal descriptions and accompanying map exhibit, field surveys, for construction and use by the City.
3.6.1 Not Used.
3.6.2 Right of Way Support and Estimating
During the engineering design phase, CONSULTANT will work in collaboration with the City to assist in analyzing the right of way requirements and provide input that result in minimizing property impacts and right of way capital cost. • Review and analyze proposed engineering design plans and determine potential right-of-way acquisition requirements.
• Take an inventory of the affected properties.
• Using public Assessor’s Roll information, investigate the ownership, lot size, and building size of each affected property.
• Develop a rough order of magnitude on high profile parcels for consideration of potential design alternatives to minimize property impacts.
• Provide input on potential solutions to mitigate impacts to private property and affected business.
3.6.3 Legal Description and Plats
Once right of way needs have been identified and received authorization, CONSULTANT will prepare up to four legal descriptions with 8-1/2” x 11” plats. One round of revisions is included in this scope of work. It is assumed that the Petsmart legal description and plat will include the Yorba Linda Boulevard widening requirements.
DELIVERABLES:
Plat and legal description (total 4) in PDF format
3.7 Hydrology and Hydraulics Study
3.7.1 Hydrology and Hydraulic Study
CONSULTANT shall prepare a Hydrology and Hydraulics Study per the requirements of the Orange County Hydrology Manual. The study shall verify that the downstream catch basin has sufficient capacity to mitigate the increased runoff from the street widening tributary area. It is assumed that the storm drain improvements are limited to the upsizing of the catch basin at Mirage Street/Crystal Drive and reconstruction of existing storm drain facilities at Savi Ranch Parkway and Mirage Street. One combined study will be prepared for the two projects.
3.7.2 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
CONSULTANT shall ensure that the project complies with all National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans should be included as a deliverable by the contractor. Therefore, provisions should be in place in the project specifications requiring the contractor to do so with appropriate parameters. CONSULTANT shall verify what post construction best management practices (BMPs) are required for inclusion in the final bid documents (PS&E) to be compliant with NPDES requirements. One combined study will be prepared for the two projects.
It is assumed Caltrans Storm Water Data Report (SWDR) is not required for this project.
3.8 Traffic Management Plan
A traffic management plan will be prepared summarizing the project objectives and details (alternatives), the study area and data collection effort, the analysis methodology and results, and preferred alternative(s) and recommendations. Traffic control plans and construction staging shall be an important element of work.
CONSULTANT shall develop a project specific Traffic Management Plan. to conceptual construction staging and traffic detour plan to verify constructability and feasibility of traffic handling for the project, primarily focusing on the minimize traffic impacts during construction. The Transportation Management Plan shall minimize project-related traffic delays, and provides continuous traffic circulation and access, with adequate space for safe and efficient
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
construction. CONSULTANT shall submit a complete Traffic Management Plan for review and approval by the City and all affected outside agencies including but not limited to City of Anaheim.
CONSULTANT will collect new traffic volume data, will compare existing data to historic traffic levels, and will work with the City to determine an anticipated traffic volume at the time of project construction. CONSULTANT will develop construction trip generation based on an equipment list and employee count for each construction phase.
CONSULTANT will overlay construction traffic according to the staging plans to develop peak hour traffic volume by construction phase.
CONSULTANT will review and analyze draft traffic detour plans and will, if necessary, adjust traffic detour plans to minimize project related traffic delays. CONSULTANT does not believe that construction activity on Savi Ranch Parkway would increase traffic on parallel arterials due to the distance to the parallel arterials. CONSULTANT will analysis the worst case lane restrictions on Savi Ranch Parkway in the OCTAM travel model to identify what traffic redistribution could be anticipated.
CONSULTANT will use the final traffic detour plans to prepare a Traffic Management Plan (TMP). This plan will include vehicle level of service calculations using intersection capacity utilization methodology and Caltrans preferred Highway Capacity Manual methodology. Although previously collected data has shown a low volume of bicycle and pedestrian activity, the TMP will include a review how these modes are affected by proposed construction. CONSULTANT will identify whether any temporary measures are necessary to and capable of alleviating anticipated substandard level of service performance. One combined report will be prepared for the two projects. CONSULTANT will modify the draft TMP based on one round of City comments prior to distribution to City of Anaheim. If requested, CONSULTANT will meet with these outside agencies to describe the TMP methodology and conclusions. CONSULTANT will modify the TMP based on one round of outside agency comments.
TASK 3 DELIVERABLES:
• Pothole Map showing existing utilities and proposed pothole locations • Base maps of the site including, survey, utilities, existing improvements, etc. (hard copy and AutoCAD files) • Right of Way Map
• Hydrology and Hydraulics Study
• Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
• Traffic Management Plan
• Geotechnical Report
TASK 4: FINAL ENGINEERING (PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE – 100%PS&E)
100% PS&E documents (Final Engineering and construction bid package) shall be prepared. Supporting work may include, but not limited to, utility coordination, survey, right of way services, and Geotechnical Investigations to support final PS&E, water quality compliance and special provisions. CONSULTANT is responsible for developing and assembling contract construction bid documents to be used in the advertising process for the construction project.
Title sheet shall include an approval block for both the City of Yorba Linda and the City of Anaheim. Work in Anaheim must adhere to Anaheim standards.
All offsite improvement design on private property or other agency property, necessary to support the roadway improvements, shall be included in the final design and CONSULTANT’s fee proposal.
4.1 Preparation of Construction Plans
Prepare final plans, describing location, design features, and construction requirements in sufficient detail to facilitate construction and estimation of construction costs. Provide all necessary supporting calculations, such as structural, for review and approval.
All plan sheets shall be in plan-view at the appropriate scale with details as necessary for construction. Plans shall include all improvements, details, traffic control, detour, and phasing plans, signing, and striping plans, etc.
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
Plans shall also show property/right of way lines, Temporary Construction Easement (TCE), and all existing improvements such as, but not limited to, curb and gutter, curb returns, cross gutters, sidewalk, access, transition work on private property, and utilities. Any removals and possible relocations shall be shown on a demolition plan.
All final plans shall be signed and stamped by a registered Civil Engineer, Structural Engineer, and/or Traffic Engineer as applicable and appropriate.
The plan listing below is a guide, however, the CONSULTANT shall submit an anticipated final plan list with the proposal.
Description Sheet
Count
Title Sheet & General Notes 1
Typical Sections 1
Removals 2
Plan & Profile 4
Drainage Improvements 1
Off-Site Improvement Plans 2
Construction Details 2
Striping Plan 1
Traffic Signal Modification 2
Street Lighting 2
Construction Staging with Traffic Handling 6
Retaining Wall Plans 4
Planting and Irrigation (Private and Public) 7
Cross Sections at 25-foot intervals showing
existing and proposed grades
6 Total 41
DELIVERABLES:
65%, 90%, 100% electronic PDF submittal for review and comments, incorporate revisions as necessary, three (3) copies of the final plans (11x17) for review and all project files in digital pdf format, including all AutoCAD drawings with reference files.
4.2 Preparation of Technical Specification and Special Provisions The City will provide the Standard Boiler Plate Specifications, and the CONSULTANT shall prepare the Technical Specifications and Special Provisions, and shall include all information, language, and forms to comply with applicable funding requirements. An interdisciplinary review (Civil vs. traffic vs. structural) shall be performed to ensure consistency of the specifications with the Engineer’s Estimate and Plans. Documentation of this review may be requested by the City. Work in other agency right of way, shall adhere to that agency’s standards and boilerplate language.
All Special Provisions for the various items of work shall be provided to the City in an organized in orderly format with continuity throughout, including work performed by sub-Consultants. The Special Provisions shall include Time of Completion, Liquidated Damages, and Work Hours, along with any other information deemed necessary. Constructing staking/surveying shall be the responsibility of the contractor.
DELIVERABLES:
65%, 90% and 100% submittal for review and comments, incorporate revisions as necessary and all project files in digital format (Microsoft Word) and three (3) hard copies. 65% submittals shall be complete and thorough enough as necessary for grant application submittals. A typical 65% submittal would include but not be limited to:
• Utilities shown within project area
• All utility conflicts identified and resolved
• Final Water Quality Features/BMPs
• Draft Structural Details and Street Schedules
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
• Draft Paylines
• Site Exploration Map and Soil Borings
• Construction Notes for all construction items
• Draft Bid Item Specifications
4.3 Preparation of Engineer’s Estimate of Construction Costs The CONSULTANT shall prepare an engineer’s cost estimate for all contract bid items, including cost certification.
Quantity calculations shall be prepared and unit costs developed to prepare an accurate cost estimate. Backup information used to estimate quantities and unit prices shall be provided to the City. A cross reference check shall be provided to the City ensuring that each line item in the Engineer’s Estimate is properly noted and described, including method of payment, with the contract specifications and that the specifications items of work are included in the estimate.
DELIVERABLES:
65%, 90% and 100% submittal for review and comments, incorporate revisions as necessary and all project files in digital format (Microsoft Excel) and three (3) hard copies
4.4 Construction Schedule and Working Day Analysis
Prepare detailed anticipated construction schedule, in Gantt bar format, highlighting items of work, anticipated construction contract duration, and phasing.
DELIVERABLES:
65%, 90% and 100% submittal for review and comments, incorporate revisions as necessary, construction schedule and all project files in digital format (Microsoft Project) and hard copies
FINAL DESIGN DELIVERABLE FORMAT
Final Bid Package Submittal:
• 4 Bond Copies (11x17), AutoCAD Files and PDF file with signatures) • Specifications (4 hard copies wet signed and stamped, Word file, and PDF file with signatures) • Project Cost Estimate (4 hard copies, Excel file, and PDF file with signatures) TASK 5: ADVERTISEMENT AND BIDDING SUPPORT
The CONSULTANT shall be available throughout the advertisement and bidding period to provide limited technical assistance to the City. This requires assistance with bidder's inquiries, preparation of addenda, and attendance at the pre-bid field meeting. Bidding procedures shall be the responsibility of the City.
During bid advertisement of the Project, contractors may wish to contact the CONSULTANT directly. CONSULTANT shall not respond to the contractor in this case and refer all questions to the City for resolution. The CONSULTANT and the City shall work together to resolve and answer all questions and the City shall issue the clarifications/responses and or addenda.
DELIVERABLES:
Pre-bid meeting and other meetings, comments on requests for information, plan/specification revisions, addendums TASK 6: CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
CONSULTANT will attend the project pre-construction meeting and provide assistance to the City during the construction phase of the project including, but not limited to:
• Respond to Requests for Information regarding the design intent of the plans and technical specifications during construction. All clarifications will be subject to approval by the City. For design conflicts during construction, CONSULTANT will assist the City with preparation of change orders as required; • Review shop drawings and submittals and provide the recommendations for approval or rejection;
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
• During the construction period, if changes occur which require revisions to the plans and/or special provisions, the CONSULTANT will make modifications to the project plans and/or special provisions as necessary, in the form of delta revisions;
• Should changes be necessary as a result of a CONSULTANT error, omission, or miscalculation, mistake, etc., CONSULTANT shall make the necessary corrections in a timely manner at the CONSULTANT’s own cost and no additional payments shall be made for such corrections/modifications to the plans and/or specifications. • After project construction is complete, CONSULTANT will prepare Record Drawings from as-built plans based on information provided by others. It is anticipated that this information will be provided as a set of project plans red lined to indicate the changes that were made during project construction. • A final bond copy of the plans, incorporating all delta revisions and changes, with wet signatures, shall be provided to the city. Final version of plans with signatures shall also be scanned and an electronic final version shall be provided to the City. The CONSULTANT shall have thirty (30) calendar days to submit final plans upon notification by the City to the CONSULTANT.
DELIVERABLES:
Meetings, comments on submittals, requests for information, change order preparation, delta revisions, asbuilt drawings.
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS
It is assumed that the duration of the Yorba Linda Boulevard widening is 24 months. There will be periods of dormancy beyond the 100% submittal while waiting for USACE responses and permitting. It is assumed that during this time that activity will be limited and monthly meetings would not be conducted.
1.1 Meetings
A project kickoff meeting will be conducted to confirm the Scope of Services and design parameters. PDT meetings will be conducted monthly throughout the duration of the project to track the overall project and facilitate the flow of information between the City, CONSULTANT, City of Anaheim, and all other stakeholders. Additional as-needed meetings will be held to address specific concerns. Agendas and meeting minutes will be generated for each meeting.
1.2 City & Community Meetings
CONSULTANT shall participate in meetings with City at the following potential meetings for Yorba Linda Boulevard:
• City Traffic Commission (2 meetings)
• City Planning Commission (3 meetings Anaheim, 2 meetings Yorba Linda - 5 total) • City Council Meeting (2 meetings Anaheim, 1 meetings Yorba Linda - 3 total) • Anaheim District Meeting (1 meeting)
• Task includes the preparation of exhibits, presentations, and responding to community input. • Comments/concerns will be tracked in an overall project matrix along with responses, action and status.
1.3 Third Party Coordination
CONSULTANT will provide coordination with other Project stakeholders as required including, but not limited to, Caltrans, City of Anaheim, OC Parks, OC Flood, OCTA, Fish and Wildlife, The State Water Resources Control Board, and United States Army Corps of Engineers. CONSULTANT will be required to address any submittal comments received from third party agencies. Comments/concerns will be tracked in an overall project matrix along with responses, action and status.
1.4 Progress Reporting
CONSULTANT will supervise, coordinate, monitor and review the project for conformance with standards, policies, and procedures. Monthly progress reports will also be provided to document the progress on the project.
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
1.5 Project Management Plan (PMP)
The PMP shall include, but not be limited to:
• Introduction: background, objectives, approach, etc.
• Project organization: key personnel, project manager, and discipline leader’s responsibilities and contact information
• Scope of work & contract document: scope, approach, prime contract, and subcontract documents • Project design procedures: design standards and criteria, report and drawing list, specification list, design reviews
• Project administrative procedures: filing system, communication protocol, etc. • Project budget, fee schedule and invoicing
• Prevailing wage rates
• City’s RFP
• Proposer’s proposal
• Professional Services Agreement
• Change orders
• Post-project procedures
• Quality Management Plan (QMP)
• Any other related project information
TASK 1 DELIVERABLES:
• Project Management Plan (3 copies due at the kick-off meeting) • Meeting notices, agendas, handouts, minutes, monthly Invoices • Updated project schedule due at the kick-off meeting and maintained throughout the project • Monthly progress reports to accompany each monthly invoice (24 total) • Monthly Progress meetings with staff (24 meetings total) • Public Meetings with City Council, commission, property owner, etc. as noted above (11 meetings total) TASK 2: PERMITTING
CONSULTANT must secure all necessary permits, including but not limited to, Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Caltrans, County of Orange, and City of Anaheim encroachment permits, etc.
The CONSULTANT shall list in the proposal all anticipated permits necessary for the successful delivery of the project.
CONSULTANT shall obtain preliminary approval from applicable regulatory agencies at the initial design phase.
CONSULTANT shall identify in their proposal when the submittal to the appropriate agency will occur and include this in the project schedule.
CONSULTANT shall provide an estimate of the required permit costs for all regulatory and encroachment permits for all agencies involved in this project.
Identify key permits required in advance of geotechnical borings in the Santa Ana Riverbed. Provide a critical path schedule regarding these key permits and propose a strategy that will fast track the acquisition of the necessary permits. CONSULTANT will be required to facilitate pre-submittal introduction meetings with all necessary regulatory agencies to help secure the necessary regulatory and encroachment permits in an expedited manner.
2.1 Caltrans Encroachment Permit
For this project, a Caltrans encroachment is required for the proposed improvements within Caltrans limits by the State Route (SR) 91 westbound off ramp at Yorba Linda Boulevard and SR 91 eastbound at Weir Canyon areas.
CONSULTANT will apply and obtain Caltrans encroachment permit to be on the jobsite to perform project related activities such as field survey and construction. It is assumed City will be responsible for the separate payment for permits, plan review and other fees or costs related to Caltrans encroachment permit.
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
2.3 OCFCD Encroachment Permit
Consultant will prepare and submit Orange County Flood Control (OCFCD) encroachment permit applications for surveying, geotechnical investigation, and construction. It is assumed City will be responsible for the separate payment for permits, plan review and other fees or costs related to OCFCD encroachment permits
2.3 Regulatory Permitting – Project Construction
2.3.1 Section 408 Permitting Assistance
A requirement of all USACE permits is to obtain Section 408 permission for any project that affects USACE facilities or local facilities that were constructed with USACE funding. Prior to the commencement of the project construction work in the Santa Ana River, Section 408 permission from the USACE will be needed. Therefore, upon request, CONSULTANT will prepare an application for Section 408 permission; however, most of the necessary information for the 408 processing, such as a detailed description of the proposed work activities and associated impacts, and measures to restore the affected areas to pre-disturbance conditions, will be provided by other technical personnel on the project team.
2.3.2 Focused Environmental Assessment (EA)
For this project, NEPA compliance is not optional because it will impact a federal facility, the Santa Ana River. A NEPA document (Environmental Assessment; EA) for Santa Ana River impacts will be required in order for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to issue a Section 408 permit and Section 404 authorization under the Clean Water Act (CWA).
The EA will be prepared consistent with USACE guidelines for submittal with the 408 and 404 Permit applications for use by the Corps to comply with NEPA. Information developed as part of the approved IS/MND will be utilized to prepare the EA. Additional documentation developed pursuant to Section 106 and information developed for the 404 Permit, both described below, would also be utilized. CONSULTANT will revise the EA in response to one round of comments from the Corps. The Corps will finalize the EA and publish a public notice soliciting comments on the Draft EA. CONSULTANT will revise the EA in response to one round of comments from the Corps. The Corps will evaluate comments received on the EA and will issue the Final EA and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
2.3.3 Section 106 Cultural Resources Study
Using the CEQA-level cultural resources record search and field survey results from 2019 as a source, CONSULTANT will prepare a Section 106 Cultural Resources Study Report for the project to address requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The report will include a detailed summary of resources identified within the record search radius and will provide the natural and cultural setting. CONSULTANT will also request an updated Sacred Lands File search and Native American contact list from the Native American Heritage Commission for use by the Army Corps of Engineers during the Section 106 Native American consultation process (post-report submittal). This scope does not include an updated record search or field survey.
2.3.4 Pre-Application Agency Coordination
CONSULTANT will request pre-application coordination with the regulatory agencies (i.e., USACE, CDFW, and RWQCB) to discuss the permitting for the proposed project. This scope and associated budget are based on separate agency meetings, to accommodate possible differences in schedule availabilities. However, for efficiency purposes, the project team will attempt to arrange a single pre-application meeting with all the permitting agencies. Given the frequent travel limitations on the agency representatives, it is expected that a virtual meeting, or meetings, such as a Microsoft Teams meeting, will take place. Prior to the scheduled meeting, CONSULTANT will provide the participating agencies with specific project-related information. CONSULTANT will prepare a suitable slide show presentation (e.g., PowerPoint presentation) to guide the discussion during the pre-application meeting. A specific topic to be discussed with CDFW at the pre-application meeting will be the proposed measures to avoid or minimize any effects to potential fish passage or fish species. Following each pre-application meeting, CONSULTANT will prepare and distribute meeting minutes that will include details discussed at the meeting, including any agency recommendations, conclusions, and/or pertinent action items.
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
2.3.5 Section 404 Pre-Construction Notification
The proposed project is expected to qualify for NWP 14, since this is a linear transportation project that is expected to result in no more than 0.25 acre of permanent loss to non-tidal WOTUS. Also, a PCN will be prepared and electronically submitted to the USACE, because the proposed project may impact more than 0.1 acre of WOTUS and/or is likely to discharge into a special aquatic site, namely jurisdictional wetlands. A detailed form required by the USACE will need to be completed as part of the PCN submittal along with a cover letter and various supporting documents and graphics. There is no filing fee required by the USACE as part of their permit process. The PCN submittal package will be provided in draft form for Project Team and City review. CONSULTANT assumes one review cycle with one set of consolidated, nonconflicting comments from the Project Team and one set of consolidated, nonconflicting comments from the City. Upon receipt of any and all comments or suggested revisions, CONSULTANT will finalize and electronically submit copies of the PCN package to the City and the USACE.
2.3.6 Section 401 Water Quality Certification Application Since the Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project will require a Section 404 permit from the USACE, a Water Quality Certification Application will be prepared and then submitted to the Santa Ana RWQCB pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA. This effort involves preparing a detailed application form, which addresses water quality and wetland issues, best management practices, and potential impacts to beneficial water uses, and preparing an alternatives analysis and a mitigation plan, both of which are separate tasks below. The 401 Application will also include an application filing fee, which will be provided by the City. The precise amount of the filing fee will be calculated later based on the fee calculator that is current at the time of submittal and based on the final estimation of permanent and temporary impacts to jurisdictional waters. The 401 Application submittal documents will be provided in draft form for Project Team and City review. CONSULTANT assumes one review cycle with one set of consolidated, nonconflicting comments from the Project Team and one set of consolidated, nonconflicting comments from the City. Upon receipt of any and all comments or suggested revisions, CONSULTANT will finalize and electronically submit copies of the 401 Application package to the City and the RWQCB.
2.3.7 Section 401 Alternatives Analysis
In April 2019, the SWRCB adopted new procedures for all Section 401 and Porter-Cologne Waste Discharge authorizations. These procedures were then approved by the Office of Administrative Law and became effective on May 28, 2020. Therefore, any application that is submitted after that date must comply with the new procedures. A new requirement under the current procedures is that 401 Applications for projects like the proposed Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project must now include an alternatives analysis. The level of rigor required in the alternatives analysis is to be commensurate with the level of impact to regulated resources. In this case, based on the relatively small magnitude of permanent impacts to USACE/RWQCB jurisdiction expected to occur, a moderate level of effort in analyzing alternatives is expected. The final alternatives analysis will ultimately be incorporated into the 401 Application submittal package.
2.3.8 Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
In accordance with project Mitigation Measure BIO-12 and anticipated permit requirements of the USACE, CDFW, RWQCB, and USFWS, CONSULTANT will prepare a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) covering the restoration of temporary impact areas and compensatory mitigation for permanent impact areas. The HMMP will describe the temporary impact restoration areas and the methods and materials that will be utilized to complete the restoration and planting. Permanent impacts to jurisdictional areas (including native habitats within the Santa Ana River Canyon Habitat Management Plan area and City of Anaheim’s coastal sage scrub mitigation site) will likely require offsite compensatory mitigation. Mitigation may occur in applicable areas adjacent to these existing mitigation and conservation lands, and/or mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program credits may be purchased to compensate for permanent impacts. CONSULTANT will coordinate with the City and project design team during development of the HMMP, and the mitigation approach will be presented to the involved regulatory agencies prior to submittal of the Draft HMMP. Other stakeholders (such as the County or mitigation bank managers) may be consulted to identify potential options for off-site mitigation opportunities. Once completed, CONSULTANT will submit the Draft HMMP for review. CONSULTANT assumes up to two rounds of document review by up to four parties, each with one set of consolidated non-conflicting comments from all reviewers, prior to submitting the Final HMMP. The HMMP will be submitted to the regulatory agencies with the permit application packages, if required.
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
It should be noted that information regarding project design alternatives as well as detailed information regarding the proposed construction methods and schedule will be required to be provided by the project design team to complete the HMMP. Furthermore, given the recent substantial changes in operable jurisdictional definitions and procedures that have occurred and may continue to occur, and considering the regulatory revisions and potential court actions, the budget associated with this task is based on an assumed number of hours estimated to be required. The precise scope of the HMMP will be highly contingent upon the results of the early coordination with the resource agencies, as well as the locations, types, and extents of impacts that would occur within jurisdictional areas. CONSULTANT will utilize our extensive permitting experience in the region to expedite these processes to the extent possible based on the project design and agency consultations. Because it is not possible to anticipate all potential mitigation scenarios, information requests, or changes in guidance, a scope and budget augment would be necessary if such requests or changes would exceed the assumed budgeted hours for this task.
2.3.9 Section 1602 Notification of Streambed Alteration Due to the anticipated alterations of jurisdictional streambeds and associated riparian habitat resulting from proposed project construction, a Notification of Streambed Alteration will be prepared and then electronically submitted to CDFW, pursuant to Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code. This task includes up to 16 hours of early coordination with CDFW representatives and Project Design Team members to address measures to avoid and/or minimize potential impacts to fish passage and fish species, especially listed species such as the Santa Ana Sucker.
Relevant information from CDFW and the Project Design Team will be incorporated into the 1602 Notification submittal. If additional time is required to address this issue beyond what is allocated here, an applicable scope of work and budget amendment would be required.
The City will provide payment of the applicable 1602 processing fee for submittal to CDFW. The precise amount of the fee will be determined later based on the fee schedule that is current at the time of submittal and based on the final estimation of project costs associated with impacts to 1602 jurisdictional areas. Once the 1602 Notification information has been reviewed by the Project Team and the City, the 1602 Notification information will be electronically submitted to CDFW via EPIMS.
2.3.10 Post-Submittal Agency Coordination
Following submittal of the various permit/authorization requests, CONSULTANT will follow up and coordinate with each of the applicable regulatory agencies, as needed. This agency coordination often requires multiple back-and-forth communications (e.g., emails, phone calls, or text messages) between the client, the client’s project team, and the various regulatory agency representatives, and sometimes requires CONSULTANT to compile and submit additional information or materials at the request of the agencies. However, a definitive determination of how much time will be required of CONSULTANT to follow up and coordinate with the regulatory agencies cannot be made at this time; therefore, CONSULTANT has allocated up to 45 hours specifically for agency follow-up and coordination and up to an additional 15 hours for internal project team coordination, as needed. If additional time is needed beyond what is allocated for both agency and project team follow up and coordination in the tasks above, CONSULTANT will notify the client in advance and then prepare and submit an applicable budget amendment. Additionally, this scope of work does not include additional analysis of impacts to biological resources beyond that included in the Biological Resources Report, Jurisdictional Delineation, or Final Environmental Documents for the project. and does not include implementation of any compliance measures or conditions identified in the permits/authorizations that are issued. If the regulatory agencies request any additional technical analysis, an applicable scope of work and budget amendment would be required.
2.3.11 Maternity-Season Bat Survey And Reporting
CONSULTANT will perform a nighttime acoustic and emergence survey at the Yorba Linda Boulevard bridge over the Santa Ana River during the summer months (i.e., June–August), when maternity colonies are fully established, to confirm the presence of a maternity colony or colonies and to determine the numbers and species of bats present.
Species composition of a maternity colony is useful because different bat species are known to have different tolerance levels for certain construction activities. CONSULTANT anticipates that CDFW may require the performance of a maternity-season survey prior to conducting geotechnical boring activities as one of the conditions of the 1602 agreement; regardless, this survey will be performed before or during final design for compliance with Mitigation Measure BIO-8 of the ISMND, and to allow adequate time for mitigation planning and coordination with CDFW.
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
Two biologists will be needed during the nighttime emergence survey at the Yorba Linda Boulevard bridge over the Santa Ana River Bridge to ensure adequate visual coverage of the exit/entry points of the structure. Each nighttime survey will begin approximately 0.5 hour before sunset and continue until at least 1 hour after sunset. Biologists will use night vision goggles (military grade PVS-7, Generation 3) augmented with infrared lights to observe emerging bats. Bat vocalizations will be recorded using full-spectrum Anabat Walkabout and Anabat Swift ultrasound detectors, with calls recorded on secure digital (SD) cards for later analysis and species identification. Following the completion of the survey, CONSULTANT will analyze all acoustic data and prepare a report summarizing the results of the surveys and documenting the numbers and species of any bats observed on site. This report will also include recommended measures to minimize potential adverse effects to bats during geotechnical boring activities.
2.3.12 Bat Mitigation and Management Plan
CDFW typically requires the preparation of a Bat Mitigation and Management Plan (BMMP) for bridge projects that may result in potential impacts to bat maternity colonies, and that the plan be submitted to CDFW prior to the start of project construction. The presence of a maternity colony at the Yorba Linda Boulevard bridge over the Santa Ana River is strongly suspected based on a previous survey performed by LSA at the site in fall 2019. If the presence of a bat maternity colony is confirmed at the Yorba Linda Boulevard Bridge, CONSULTANT will prepare a BMMP for the project that will include a detailed analysis of potential project-related impacts to bats and bat-roosting habitat, as well as recommendations for bat avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures to minimize those potential impacts. This task includes time for coordination between a bat specialist and the project environmental and design team to discuss the details of the project, including the proposed construction methods and schedule, which will allow the bat specialist to determine the nature of any potential impacts to bats that could result from project construction and to develop appropriate measures. The detailed and specific measures discussed in the BMMP will comprise a variety of strategies that may include, but are not limited to, humane eviction/exclusion, installation of alternate roosting habitat, implementation of avoidance buffers, and seasonal restrictions on certain work activities. Implementation of the BMMP will be incorporated as part of the construction contract.
2.4 Regulatory Permitting – Geotechnical Borings
To conduct the two geotechnical borings and single pothole within the Santa Ana River, a full suite of permits will be required, similar to Task 2.3, as listed below.
2.4.1 Section 408 Permitting Assistance
2.4.2 Pre-Appplication Agency Coordination
2.4.3 404 Pre-Construction Notification
2.4.4 401 Notice of Intent
2.4.5 1602 Notification
2.4.6 Post-Submittal Agency Coordination
TASK 2 DELIVERABLES:
• Coordinate and complete all administrative work necessary to obtain related permits (404, 408, 401 and 1602 permits)
• Assistance to the City regarding Section 214/Section 1156(a)(2) agreements for funding USACE reviews TASK 3: BASELINE DATA COLLECTION
The following information will be provided by the City. • Aerial Topography (AutoCAD 2016 format)
• Orthorectified Aerial Photograph
• Utility notifications, responses, and facility maps or record drawings
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
3.1 Data Collection
Existing and readily available data will be assembled from the City and other Agencies, including improvement plans, drainage reports, geotechnical data, As-Built drawings, other reports, traffic data, agreements, assessor parcel data, tract and parcel maps, and right of way information.
3.2 Utility Potholing
In the CONSULTANT’s proposed fee schedule, the CONSULTANT must provide an allowance, for potholing of utilities related costs, including other agency costs, and of any proposed locations of new improvements such as traffic signal foundations. Locations must be based on information received from utility investigations and the design plans showing proposed traffic signal poles. CONSULTANT must confirm with the City whether utilities must be marked prior to or after the design topographical survey. Pothole locations and depths will be marked on the pavement surface and will show both horizontal location and depth from surface to the utility. Compensation will be based on the unit price for each pothole as listed in the fee schedule but may not exceed the allowance. Such unit price shall include all necessary efforts related to this item, including traffic control. From the utility research and utility potholing, CONSULTANT will compile and incorporate utility information on the roadway Base Sheets. Conflicts with existing utilities will be identified for resolution with the conflicting utility. Pothole locations must be backfilled with a permanent cement-type material (for Anaheim pothole restoration, must follow City of Anaheim Standard No. 132 and any other applicable Anaheim standards), to be approved by the appropriate City’s Public Works Superintendent. Provide a summary report of findings as the deliverable for this item.
The followings have been assumed for this task:
- 7 potholes (up to 8’ deep)
- 1 pothole (approximate 20’ deep on MWD pipeline)
- 1 Pothole within the Santa Ana River (approximately 25’ deep). A separate USACE permit will not be required, this will be included alongside the geotechnical borings on the permit application. - 4 potholes for existing wall footing
3.3 Geotechnical Investigation and Reporting
3.3.1 Field investigations
• Review of available pertinent, published, geotechnical literature and maps • Site reconnaissance of the existing onsite geologic/geotechnical conditions and mapping of the site • Public utility clearance (USA)
• Subsurface soil sampling and boring by a geologist.
o Proposed boring locations for the project:
Bridge widening: One boring each at Abutment 1, Pier 2, Pier 6, and Abutment 7 to 80 to 100 feet deep.
Retaining walls and pavement: Three borings to 50 feet deep. One of the borings for Retaining Wall No. 2 is planned to be located on the private property south of Old Canal Road.
o The Orange County Department of Environmental Health (OCDEH) requires a permit for deep soil borings or borings that extend into groundwater regardless of depth. CONSULTANT will prepare a boring permit application for seven borings. The application will include a narrative describing work plan details, and a scaled drawing of existing roads, and property boundaries. The OCDEH requires at least 10 days for processing of the permit application. CONSULTANT intends to submit the application along with permit fees.
o Prior to the field exploration, we will mark the proposed boring locations, contact DigAlert for utility marking, and apply for encroachment permits from the Cities of Yorba Linda and Anaheim.
Representative soil samples will be collected at selected depths from the borings and transported to our laboratory for testing.
• Proposer to provide a preliminary plan showing proposed locations of pits and depths for City review and approval.
• Comply with Water Quality NPDES requirements
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
3.3.2 Geotechnical Analysis
• Geotechnical laboratory testing of representative soil samples obtained. Geotechnical testing including:
Atterberg Limits, maximum density/optimum moisture content, direct shear testing, expansion index testing, corrosion testing (soluble sulfate, pH, chlorides, and minimum resistivity testing), and R-value testing. Limited laboratory testing to support our field observations and provide engineering properties for analyses • Prepare final drill logs and map for inclusion in geotechnical summary report • Geologic analyses of findings made during field exploration • An evaluation of faulting and seismicity of the region, and the possible impact of regional seismicity on the site and the proposed construction
• Slope stability is included for the proposed fill slope, retaining walls, and abutment slopes • Earthquake considerations including seismic design criteria and seismic hazards such as ground rupture due to surface faulting, site acceleration, and potential for liquefaction, lateral spreading and seismically induced settlements.
• Soil profile type, peak ground acceleration (PGA) and acceleration response spectra (ARS) curves for seismic design in accordance with the latest edition of Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (SDC). • Analysis of feasible deep foundation types, design parameters and recommendations, including axial pile capacities, parameters for lateral pile analysis, estimated settlement, and pile driveability.
3.3.3 Summary Report
• Analysis of the geotechnical data obtained from the field reconnaissance and laboratory testing • Includes geologic summary of constraints identified during field our investigation • Includes recommendations for corrosion protection and mitigation of steel and concrete as required, feasible foundation type and design parameter, retaining wall and shoring design parameter, earthwork and grading criteria, pavement section, and general geotechnical conditions, based on our investigation • Map showing exploration and potential constraints
• Other content and formats as required by the City
3.3.4 Confirmation Boring, Testing, Lab Analysis, Reporting Two geotechnical borings will be conducted in the Santa Ana River, adjacent to Piers 3 and 4. A boring will not be done near Pier 5 due to its inaccessibility, though existing boring information is available in proximity. Clearing of vegetation will be required for access. Permits from OCFCD and USACE are required and included herein.
Testing and lab analysis will be performed consistent with Task 3.3.2. The Summary Report will be amended to include these results.
Assumptions:
1. Encroachment permit from the City will be issued on a no-fee basis.
2. Field exploration can be performed during normal weekdays (Monday – Friday) between 7 am and 5 pm.
3. The borings can be backfilled with soil cutting mixed with cement and patched with cold-mix asphalt where asphalt is penetrated.
4. The City of Yorba Linda will obtain permission from owner of the private property south of Old Canal Road for one of the proposed boring locations.
5. Identification, handling, and treatment of materials that need to be environmentally addressed are beyond the scope of our geotechnical engineering services. If such materials are encountered, we will notify you immediately and a proposal for handling of such materials will be submitted upon request.
3.4 Utility Coordination
Existing utility information will be mapped on the project base map and determine potential conflicts with proposed improvements. The CONSULTANT shall conduct initial meetings with those utility companies that are potentially in conflict. CONSULTANT shall prepare draft notifications to all utility companies known to operate within the project area
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
to identify the type and locations of utilities for the project. The City will send said notification on City letterhead and provide CONSULTANT with responses.
• Develop provisions to accommodate existing and new utility facilities (e.g., maintained in place, removed, adjusted, abandoned, or installed).
• Effectively identify utility locations and resolve conflicts on proposed plans to keep project on schedule.
Prepare Utility Conflict Sheet to summarize conflict and resolution. • Notify responsible utility owner of necessary facility relocation or adjustment. • Significant utility impacts shall be reflected to the project schedule and coordinate to not conflict with other items of construction work.
3.5 Survey Control
A project surveyor will conduct research of record survey control data and mapping from the City of Yorba Linda, City of Anaheim, and the County of Orange. Please note that improvements in Anaheim need to use Anaheim’s survey control. The field surveyors will recover horizontal / vertical control monuments used for aerial mapping control, centerline monumentation and ties, and establish the record centerline on Savi Ranch Parkway and Mirage Street.
Surveys performed by CONSULTANT shall conform to the requirements of the Land Surveyors Act and Caltrans Surveys Manual. In accordance with the Act, "responsible charge" for the work shall reside with a pre-January 1, 1982, Registered Civil Engineer, or a Licensed Land Surveyor, in the State of California.
CONSULTANT shall conduct a complete survey of the project area, including locations for rights of way in the project area, and develop topographic survey files in AutoCAD format as basis for design work. Survey shall include areas beneath the bridge and shall be surveyed after appropriate permits are obtained from by the CONSULTANT from Orange County Parks and Flood Control. A base map will be prepared and provided to the City for review.
3.5.1 Survey Control, Design Survey and Right of Way/LandNet Mapping CONSULTANT will perform a field survey to establish the control necessary for the project area. Project horizontal control (NAD83) and vertical control (NAVD88) will be established based upon GPS ties to the CSRC network, California Coordinate System 1983 (CCS83), Zone VI, Epoch 2017.5 for horizontal and vertical. Additional local benchmarks from the Orange County Geodetic Control will also be verified, for elevation control and confirmation. CONSULTANT will include control points in the Electronic Base Map which will include coordinates and elevations used for each point.
CONSULTANT will perform field survey to collect detailed centerline and topographic data within the project limits, including:
Approximately 700 feet of Yorba Linda Boulevard between Santa Ana Canyon Road and eastbound off ramp to Yorba Linda Blvd
Approximately 750 feet of Yorba Linda Blvd, north of the westbound off ramp and to Savi Ranch Parkway Southerly half of Old Canal Road to Mirage Street.
Portion of Yorba Linda Blvd. between Savi Ranch Parkway and Crystal Drive Easterly half of the bridge over the Santa Ana River, with bridge features within the river Easterly portion of Yorba Linda Blvd from the bridge to La Palma Avenue La Palma Avenue from Yorba Linda Boulevard to just east of Mercado del Rio center.
Right of way and property boundary lines as established will be shown on the Topographic map with ties to sufficient survey monuments as field located and verified.
CONSULTANT will Research existing record maps and right of way documents, review Preliminary Title Reports for easements and rights, field locate and verify some existing record survey monuments, analysis all field data and record documents to prepare the project base map and LandNet for use through design and requirement phases for parcels that will require a permanent acquisition.
Deliverables
• Project Topographic Base Map derived from field data (AutoCAD Civil 3D 2019) • Survey Control Report – for horizontal and vertical control • Survey field notes and site photos
• Preliminary Title Reports (7)
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
• Right of Way Mapping
3.6 Right of Way Mapping and Acquisition
Obtain existing Parcel Maps, Tract Maps and Preliminary Title Reports for parcels on either side of Yorba Linda Boulevard. Map right of way, parcel lines, and easements on the project base map. CONSULTANT must identify right of way impacts associated with the project. Existing right of way lines will be identified on the engineering plans. Obtain Right of Way Certification summarizing the status of all right of way related matters pertaining to a proposed construction project.
CONSULTANT will check and review for accuracy existing and proposed all recorded property legal instruments such as, but not limited to, survey documentation and title reports, lot and boundary closure, dedications and easement provisions, legal descriptions, completeness and accuracy of data notation, and necessary certifications of City staff.
CONSULTANT shall support the City in its right of way acquisition efforts including, but not limited to, surveying, determination of right-of- way areas, preparation of legal descriptions and accompanying map exhibit, field surveys, for construction and use by the City.
3.6.1 Right of Way Support and Estimating
During the engineering design phase, Monument will work in collaboration with the City to assist in analyzing the right-of-way requirements and provide input that result in minimizing property impacts and right-of-way capital cost. • Review and analyze proposed engineering design plans and determine potential right-of-way acquisition requirements.
• Take an inventory of the affected properties.
• Using public Assessor’s Roll information, investigate the ownership, lot size, and building size of each affected property.
• Develop a rough order of magnitude on high profile parcels for consideration of potential design alternatives to minimize property impacts.
• Provide input on potential solutions to mitigate impacts to private property and affected business and residential occupants.
3.6.2 Legal Description and Plats
Once right of way needs have been identified and received authorization, CONSULTANT will prepare up to twenty-five legal descriptions with 8-1/2” x 11” plats. One round of revisions is included in this scope of work.
DELIVERABLES:
Plat and legal descriptions (total 25) in PDF format
3.7 Hydrology and Hydraulics Study
3.7.1 Hydrology and Hydraulic Study
CONSULTANT shall prepare a Hydrology and Hydraulics Study per the requirements of the Orange County Hydrology Manual. The study shall verify that the downstream catch basin has sufficient capacity to mitigate the increased runoff from the street widening tributary area. One combined study will be prepared for the two projects.
3.7.2 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
CONSULTANT shall ensure that the project complies with all National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans should be included as a deliverable by the contractor. Therefore, provisions should be in place in the project specifications requiring the contractor to do so with appropriate parameters. CONSULTANT shall verify what post construction best management practices (BMPs) are required for inclusion in the final bid documents (PS&E) to be compliant with NPDES requirements. One combined study will be prepared for the two projects.
It is assumed Caltrans Storm Water Data Report (SWDR) is not required for this project.
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
3.7.3 River Hydraulics and Scour Analysis
Provide engineering services to prepare a Final Bridge Hydraulics Report for the bridge widening over the Santa Ana River. The hydraulic analysis of the river will be prepared using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-RAS computer model. The model will be developed from the latest available hydraulic model of the river from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The baseline (existing) condition model will be updated at the bridge location using the most current topographic mapping to include additional cross sections for the bridge widening and to establish the baseline condition of the river. A project condition model will then be prepared which incorporates the proposed widening. The change in water surface elevations along the river associated with the extension of the bridge piers will be evaluated and the results of the analysis will be used to prepare the Final Bridge Hydraulics Report. If any impacts are identified, they will be discussed with the team and potential mitigation measures developed. Abutment and pier scour associated with the widening will also be evaluated using the scour analysis procedures prescribed in HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges.
3.8 Traffic Management Plan
A traffic management plan will be prepared in support of PR/ED and will be prepared summarizing the project objectives and details (alternatives), the study area and data collection effort, the analysis methodology and results, and preferred alternative(s) and recommendations. Traffic control plans and construction staging shall be an important element of work.
CONSULTANT shall develop a project specific Traffic Management Plan. to conceptual construction staging and traffic detour plan to verify constructability and feasibility of traffic handling for the project, primarily focusing on the minimize traffic impacts during construction. The Transportation Management Plan shall minimize project-related traffic delays, and provides continuous traffic circulation and access, with adequate space for safe and efficient construction. CONSULTANT shall submit a complete Traffic Management Plan for review and approval by the City and all affected outside agencies including but not limited to City of Anaheim and Caltrans.
CONSULTANT shall submit for and obtain necessary encroachment permits for construction traffic control from these outside agencies for use by the contractor.
CONSULTANT will collect new traffic volume data, will compare existing data to historic traffic levels, and will work with the City to determine an anticipated traffic volume at the time of project construction. CONSULTANT will develop construction trip generation based on an equipment list and employee count for each construction phase.
CONSULTANT will overlay construction traffic according to the staging plans to develop peak hour traffic volume by construction phase.
CONSULTANT will review and analyze draft traffic detour plans and will, if necessary, adjust traffic detour plans to minimize project related traffic delays. CONSULTANT does not believe that construction activity on Yorba Linda Boulevard would increase traffic on parallel arterials due to the distance to the parallel arterials. It is possible that construction on Yorba Linda Boulevard could cause some regional traffic currently cutting through Yorba Linda and Anaheim to stay on State Route 91. CONSULTANT will analysis the worst case lane restrictions on Yorba Linda Boulevard in the OCTAM travel model to identify what traffic redistribution could be anticipated.
CONSULTANT will use the final traffic detour plans to prepare a Traffic Management Plan (TMP). This plan will include vehicle level of service calculations using intersection capacity utilization methodology and Caltrans preferred Highway Capacity Manual methodology. Although previously collected data has shown a low volume of bicycle and pedestrian activity, the TMP will include a review how these modes are affected by proposed construction. CONSULTANT will identify whether any temporary measures are necessary to and capable of alleviating anticipated substandard level of service performance. One combined report will be prepared for the two projects. CONSULTANT will modify the draft TMP based on one round of City comments prior to distribution to Caltrans and City of Anaheim. If requested, CONSULTANT will meet with these outside agencies to describe the TMP methodology and conclusions. If requested by the City, CONSULTANT will modify the TMP based on one round of outside agency comments.
3.9 Geometric Refinements
CONSULTANT will identify design concepts that may be incorporated to reduce project costs and minimize conflicts between the proposed improvements and existing site improvements and utilities. We will submit updated concept to the City for review and approval prior to commencing final design.
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
CONSULTANT will prepare a rough order of magnitude cost differential using the Project Report estimate and unit costs as a basis for direct comparison.
A workshop will be conducted with City staff to review the project refinements. As needed, further revisions will be incorporated based on the workshop findings. Outcome will be a final refinement approved by the City that will move into final design.
TASK 3 DELIVERABLES:
• Pothole Map showing existing utilities and proposed pothole locations • Base maps of the site including, survey, utilities, existing improvements, etc. (hard copy and AutoCAD files) • Right of Way Map
• Hydrology and Hydraulics Study
• Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
• River Hydraulics & Scour Analysis
• Traffic Management Plan
• Geotechnical Report
• Geometric Refinements
TASK 4: FINAL ENGINEERING (PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE - 100% PS&E)
100% PS&E documents (Final Engineering and construction bid package) shall be prepared.
Supporting work may include, but not limited to, utility coordination, survey, right of way services, and Geotechnical Investigations to support final PS&E, water quality compliance and special provisions. CONSULTANT is responsible for developing and assembling contract construction bid documents to be used in the advertising process for the construction project.
Title sheet shall include an approval block for both the City of Yorba Linda and the City of Anaheim. Work in Anaheim must adhere to Anaheim standards.
All offsite improvement design on private property or other agency property, necessary to support the roadway improvements, shall be included in the final design and CONSULTANT’s fee proposal.
4.1 Preparation of Construction Plans
Prepare final plans, describing location, design features, and construction requirements in sufficient detail to facilitate construction and estimation of construction costs. Provide all necessary supporting calculations, such as structural, for review and approval.
All plan sheets shall be in plan-view at the appropriate scale with details as necessary for construction. Plans shall include all improvements, details, traffic control, detour, and phasing plans, signing, and striping plans, etc.
Plans shall also show property/right of way lines, Temporary Construction Easement (TCE), and all existing improvements such as, but not limited to, curb and gutter, curb returns, cross gutters, sidewalk, access, transition work on private property, and utilities. Any removals and possible relocations shall be shown on a demolition plan.
All final plans shall be signed and stamped by a registered Civil Engineer, Structural Engineer, and/or Traffic Engineer as applicable and appropriate.
The plan listing below is a guide, however, the CONSULTANT shall submit an anticipated final plan list with the proposal.
Description Sheet
Count
Title Sheet & General Notes 1
Typical Sections 2
Removals 9
Plan & Profile 16
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
Off-Street Bike Trail Plans 2
Off-Site Improvement Plans 2
Drainage & Stormwater 2
Construction Details 4
River Mitigation Improvements 2
Striping Plan 5
Traffic Signal Modification 4
Street Lighting 5
Construction Staging with Traffic Handling 10
Retaining Wall Plans 8
Bridge Widening Plans 37
Miscellaneous Structures 6
Planting and Irrigation (Private and Public) 6
Cross Sections at 25-foot intervals showing
existing and proposed grades
12 Total 133
Clarifications:
• Bridge widening effort includes the “combined structure” analysis that assesses the overall widened structure’s behavior during an earthquake. Any mitigation of remaining issues with the bridge will be built into our overall structure design and detailing scope. The widening is commonly designed to provide mitigation of problems with the existing bridge, but we may find that separate and specialized improvements need to be added to our plans to address shortcomings that we identify and include in our design. . • Miscellaneous structures include foundations and details for Savi Ranch monument sign relocation and the City of Yorba Linda and Anaheim city entry monuments. It is assumed that details and/or as-builts for these signs will be provided by the cities. Yorba Linda monument sign includes structural design, calculations and details. Anaheim entry monument is assumed to not require special structural design and will be detailed as per as-builts.
• Utilities will be shown on each plan set and not on a separate set of plans. • Parent utility company is responsible for the design of any required relocation of their facility. SCE and Anaheim Public Utilities is responsible for the street light design in Yorba Linda and Anaheim, respectively.
CONSULTANT to provide street light locations, conduit and pullbox locations. Photogrammetry calculations are not included.
DELIVERABLES
65%, 90%, 100% electronic PDF submittal for review and comments, incorporate revisions as necessary, three (3) copies of the final plans (11x17) for review and all project files in digital pdf format, including all AutoCAD drawings with reference files.
4.2 Preparation of Technical Specifications and Special Provisions The City will provide the Standard Boiler Plate Specifications, and the CONSULTANT shall prepare the Technical Specifications and Special Provisions, and shall include all information, language, and forms to comply with applicable funding requirements. An interdisciplinary review (Civil vs. traffic vs. structural) shall be performed to ensure consistency of the specifications with the Engineer’s Estimate and Plans. Documentation of this review may be requested by the City. Work in other agency right of way, shall adhere to that agency’s standards and boilerplate language.
All Special Provisions for the various items of work shall be provided to the City in an organized in orderly format with continuity throughout, including work performed by sub-Consultants. The Special Provisions shall include Time of Completion, Liquidated Damages, and Work Hours, along with any other information deemed necessary. Constructing staking/surveying shall be the responsibility of the contractor.
CONSULTANT shall incorporate all Federal requirements, as necessary, including special language and forms or exhibits, for the construction phase into final specifications. Include and reference all permits and Environmental
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
Commitment Record. For the Yorba Linda Blvd. Widening Project, it is likely that federal funding will be utilized.
Consequently, it is recommended that the CONSULTANT team be highly familiar and qualified in the assembling of bid documents and the procurement of Construction contractors in accordance with FHWA and Caltrans requirements.
DELIVERABLES
65%, 90% and 100% submittal for review and comments, incorporate revisions as necessary and all project files in digital format (Microsoft Word) and three (3) hard copies. 65% submittals shall be complete and thorough enough as necessary for grant application submittals. A typical 65% submittal would include but not be limited to:
• Utilities shown within project area
• All utility conflicts identified and resolved
• Final Water Quality Features/BMPs
• Draft Structural Details and Street Schedules
• Draft Paylines
• Site Exploration Map and Soil Borings
• Construction Notes for all construction items
• Draft Bid Item Specifications
4.3 Preparation of Engineer’s Estimate of Construction Costs The CONSULTANT shall prepare an engineer’s cost estimate for all contract bid items, including cost certification.
Quantity calculations shall be prepared, and unit costs developed to prepare an accurate cost estimate. Backup information used to estimate quantities and unit prices shall be provided to the City. A cross reference check shall be provided to the City ensuring that each line item in the Engineer’s Estimate is properly noted and described, including method of payment, with the contract specifications and that the specifications items of work are included in the estimate.
DELIVERABLES
65%, 90% and 100% submittal for review and comments, incorporate revisions as necessary and all project files in digital format (Microsoft Excel) and three (3) hard copies
4.4 Construction Schedule and Working Day Analysis
Prepare detailed anticipated construction schedule, in Gantt bar format, highlighting items of work, anticipated construction contract duration, and phasing.
DELIVERABLES
65%, 90% and 100% submittal for review and comments, incorporate revisions as necessary, construction schedule and all project files in digital format (Microsoft Project) and hard copies
FINAL DESIGN DELIVERABLE FORMAT
Final Bid Package Submittal:
• 4 Bond Copies (11x17), AutoCAD Files and PDF file with signatures) • Specifications (4 hard copies wet signed and stamped, Word file, and PDF file with signatures) • Project Cost Estimate (4 hard copies, Excel file, and PDF file with signatures) TASK 5: ADVERTISEMENT AND BIDDING SUPPORT
The CONSULTANT shall be available throughout the advertisement and bidding period to provide limited technical assistance to the City. This requires assistance with bidder's inquiries, preparation of addenda, and attendance at the pre-bid field meeting. Bidding procedures shall be the responsibility of the City.
During bid advertisement of the Project, contractors may wish to contact the CONSULTANT directly. CONSULTANT shall not respond to the contractor in this case and refer all questions to the City for resolution. The CONSULTANT and the City shall work together to resolve and answer all questions and the City shall issue the clarifications/responses and or addenda.
Revision Date: 10/24/2022
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project and Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project City of Yorba Linda
DELIVERABLES
Pre-bid meeting and other meetings, comments on requests for information, plan/specification revisions, addendums TASK 6: CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
CONSULTANT will attend the project pre-construction meeting and provide assistance to the City during the construction phase of the project including, but not limited to:
• Respond to Requests for Information regarding the design intent of the plans and technical specifications during construction. All clarifications will be subject to approval by the City. For design conflicts during construction, CONSULTANT will assist the City with preparation of change orders as required; • Review shop drawings and submittals and provide the recommendations for approval or rejection; • During the construction period, if changes occur which require revisions to the plans and/or special provisions, the CONSULTANT will make modifications to the project plans and/or special provisions as necessary, in the form of delta revisions;
• Should changes be necessary as a result of a CONSULTANT error, omission, or miscalculation, mistake, etc., CONSULTANT shall make the necessary corrections in a timely manner at the CONSULTANT’s own cost and no additional payments shall be made for such corrections/modifications to the plans and/or specifications. • After project construction is complete, CONSULTANT will prepare Record Drawings from as-built plans based on information provided by others. It is anticipated that this information will be provided as a set of project plans red lined to indicate the changes that were made during project construction. • A final bond copy of the plans, incorporating all delta revisions and changes, with wet signatures, shall be provided to the city. Final version of plans with signatures shall also be scanned and an electronic final version shall be provided to the City. The CONSULTANT shall have thirty (30) calendar days to submit final plans upon notification by the City to the CONSULTANT.
DELIVERABLES
Meetings, comments on submittals, requests for information, change order preparation, delta revisions, asbuilt drawings
A P P E N D I X H .
RIGHT OF WAY –
UP DATED ES TIMATES
AND REQUIREMENTS
# APN PROPERTY ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER (Business)
ROADWAY
EASEMENT
AREA
(SF)
FOOTING
AREA (SF)
TCE AREA
(SF)
FEE LAND
VALUE
DISCOUNT
FACTOR
PRICE PER
SQUARE
FOOT (after
discount)
TCE ESMT
(Discount
Rate %)
TCE
DURATION
(YEARS)
TOTAL
ROADWAY
EASEMENT
$
TOTAL
FOOTING
EASEMENT $
TOTAL TCE $ SEVERANCE
DAMAGES RELOCATION DEMO SITE IMPVMTS.
& DAMAGES
LOSS OF
GOODWILL
TOTAL
PARCEL
ROW COST
COMMENTS/ACQUISITION IMPACTS/ASSUMPTIONS
1 352-112-04
352-112-03
5521 Mirage St, Yorba Linda, CA 92887
5511 Mirage St, Yorba Linda, Ca 92887
Roscher Arno A. Trust (Pet Smart)
USR Real Estate Holdings LLC 5,726 27,705 $89.00 0% $89.00 10% 1 $ 509,614 $ - $ 246,575 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 1,606,189 Commercial Use Property – proposed impacts are landscaping, trees and temporary loss of parking (approx. 19). Proposed acquisition area is encumbered by existing easements. Coordination with existing easement holders (SCE) is necessary, in 2 352-113-02 22401 Old Canal Rd, Yorba Linda, Ca
92887
Yorbrook LLC
(Sprouts Farmers Market) 249 2,273 $89.00 10% $80.10 10% 1 $ 14,959 $ - $ 13,655 $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ - $ 53,614 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping and trees only. No parking and/or access impacts are anticipated. 3 351-042-32 Situs NA City of Anaheim 351 9,135 $89.00 50% $0.00 10% 2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Owned by City of Anaheim - No Project Cost 4 351-042-08, 10,
15 & 16 Situs NA OCFCD 6,374 694 6,972 $89.00 75% $22.25 10% 2 $ 141,822 $ 15,442 $ 31,025 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 188,288 Flood Channel Property - OCFCD acquisitions require a profound understanding of their processes and timelines. It is assumed that Santa Ana River Trail will not be 5 352-211-20 Situs NA OCFCD 16,843 2,305 14,236 $89.00 75% $22.25 10% 2 $ 374,757 $ 51,286 $ 63,350 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 489,393 Same comments as above 6 352-111-05 Situs NA OCFCD 3,554 2 5,062 $89.00 75% $22.25 10% 2 $ 79,077 $ 45 $ 22,526 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 101,647 Same comments as above 7 352-111-24 Situs NA Keledjian Eileen J. 2005 Revocable Tr. 455 340 427 $89.00 75% $22.25 10% 2 $ 10,124 $ 7,565 $ 1,900 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,589 Vacant Land – the property appears to be a remnant and not developable. Anticipated minimal impacts to the land only. 8 352-112-04 5521 Mirage St, Yorba Linda, CA 92887 Roscher Arno A. Trust (Pet Smart) 7,823 235 16,057 $89.00 85% $13.35 10% 2 $ 104,437 $ 3,137 $ 42,872 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 200,446 Commercial Use Property – proposed impacts are contained to landscaping and trees only. No parking and/or access impacts are anticipated. Proposed acquisition area is 9 352-113-01 22401 Old Canal Rd, Yorba Linda, Ca
92887
Yorbook LLC (Sprouts Farmers
Market) 1,629 537 $89.00 10% $80.10 2 $ 130,483 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 140,483 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping and trees only. No parking and/or access impacts are anticipated. Proposed acquisition area is 10 354-082-05 8275 E Santa Ana Canyon Rd, Anaheim,
Ca 92808 Tesoro South Coast Company LLC 1,765 $89.00 10% $80.10 10% 2 $ - $ - $ 28,275 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 38,275 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping and trees only. No parking and/or access impacts are anticipated. 11 354-082-07
(354-451-22 &
8285 E Santa Ana Canyon Rd, Anaheim,
Ca 92808 Taylor Richard B Trust 2,050 $89.00 10% $80.10 10% 2 $ - $ - $ 32,841 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 42,841 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping and trees only. No parking and/or access impacts are anticipated. 12 352-117-01, 02,
03 Taco Bell 2,171 3,740 $89.00 10% $80.10 10% 2 $ 173,897 $ - $ 59,915 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 243,812 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping only. 13 352-117-04 Chick-fil-A 1,840 1,611 $89.00 10% $80.10 10% 2 $ 147,384 $ - $ 25,808 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 183,192 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping only. 14 352-222-02 VCA Vetenarian Hospital 0 0 $89.00 50% $44.50 10% 2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping only. 46,664 3,927 91,570 $ 1,686,552 $ 77,475 $ 568,743 $ - $ - $ 225,000 $ 500,000 $ 3,307,769 Sub Total $ 661,554
$ 3,969,323 TOTAL ROW
ACQUISITION ESTIMATE
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD & SAVI RANCH WIDENING PROJECTS
CITY OF YORBA LINDA
ROW ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE - PROJECT REPORT/TECH MEMO
SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
CONTINGENCY (20%)
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE
UPDATED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING/PROJECT REPORT
TOTAL ROW COST PER
PROJECT REPORT & TECH MEMO:
DIFFERENCE:
$ 3,603,000
$ 366,000
# APN PROPERTY ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER (Business)
ROADWAY
EASEMENT
AREA
(SF)
FOOTING
AREA (SF)
TCE AREA
(SF)
FEE LAND
VALUE
DISCOUNT
FACTOR
PRICE PER
SQUARE
FOOT (after
discount)
TCE ESMT
(Discount
Rate %)
TCE
DURATION
(YEARS)
TOTAL
ROADWAY
EASEMENT
$
TOTAL
FOOTING
EASEMENT $
TOTAL TCE $ SEVERANCE
DAMAGES RELOCATION DEMO SITE IMPVMTS.
& DAMAGES
LOSS OF
GOODWILL
TOTAL
PARCEL
ROW COST
COMMENTS/ACQUISITION IMPACTS/ASSUMPTIONS
1 352-112-04
352-112-03
5521 Mirage St, Yorba Linda, CA 92887
5511 Mirage St, Yorba Linda, Ca 92887
Roscher Arno A. Trust (Pet Smart)
USR Real Estate Holdings LLC 5,726 16,221 $89.00 0% $89.00 10% 1 $ 509,614 $ - $ 144,367 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 853,981 Commercial Use Property – proposed impacts are landscaping, trees. No temporary loss of parking (approx. 19). Proposed acquisition area is encumbered by existing easements. Coordination with existing easement holders (SCE) is necessary, in 2 352-113-02 22401 Old Canal Rd, Yorba Linda, Ca
92887
Yorbrook LLC
(Sprouts Farmers Market) 249 2,273 $89.00 10% $80.10 10% 1 $ 14,959 $ - $ 13,655 $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ - $ 53,614 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping and trees only. No parking and/or access impacts are anticipated. 3 351-042-32 Situs NA City of Anaheim 351 9,135 $89.00 50% $0.00 10% 2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Owned by City of Anaheim - No Project Cost 4 351-042-08, 10,
15 & 16 Situs NA OCFCD (all additions shown here) 6,929 694 7,412 $89.00 75% $22.25 10% 2 $ 154,170 $ 15,442 $ 32,983 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 202,595 Flood Channel Property - OCFCD acquisitions require a profound understanding of their processes and timelines. It is assumed that Santa Ana River Trail will not be 5 352-211-20 Situs NA OCFCD (all deductions shown
here) 12,693 1,933 14,236 $89.00 75% $22.25 10% 2 $ 282,419 $ 43,009 $ 63,350 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 388,779 Same comments as above 6 352-111-05 Situs NA OCFCD 3,554 2 5,062 $89.00 75% $22.25 10% 2 $ 79,077 $ 45 $ 22,526 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 101,647 Same comments as above 7 352-111-24 Situs NA Keledjian Eileen J. 2005 Revocable Tr. 455 340 427 $89.00 75% $22.25 10% 2 $ 10,124 $ 7,565 $ 1,900 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,589 Vacant Land – the property appears to be a remnant and not developable. Anticipated minimal impacts to the land only. 8 352-112-04 5521 Mirage St, Yorba Linda, CA 92887 Roscher Arno A. Trust (Pet Smart) 6,106 235 17,774 $89.00 85% $13.35 10% 2 $ 81,515 $ 3,137 $ 47,457 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ 182,109 Commercial Use Property – proposed impacts are contained to landscaping and trees only. No parking and/or access impacts are anticipated. Proposed acquisition area is 9 352-113-01 22401 Old Canal Rd, Yorba Linda, Ca
92887
Yorbook LLC (Sprouts Farmers
Market) 1,629 537 $89.00 10% $80.10 2 $ 130,483 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 140,483 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping and trees only. No parking and/or access impacts are anticipated. Proposed acquisition area is 10 354-082-05 8275 E Santa Ana Canyon Rd, Anaheim,
Ca 92808 Tesoro South Coast Company LLC 1,765 $89.00 10% $80.10 10% 2 $ - $ - $ 28,275 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 38,275 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping and trees only. No parking and/or access impacts are anticipated. 11 354-082-07
(354-451-22 &
8285 E Santa Ana Canyon Rd, Anaheim,
Ca 92808 Taylor Richard B Trust 2,050 $89.00 10% $80.10 10% 2 $ - $ - $ 32,841 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 42,841 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping and trees only. No parking and/or access impacts are anticipated. 12 352-117-01, 02,
03 Taco Bell 2,171 3,740 $89.00 10% $80.10 10% 2 $ 173,897 $ - $ 59,915 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 243,812 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping only. 13 352-117-04 Chick-fil-A 1,840 1,611 $89.00 10% $80.10 10% 2 $ 147,384 $ - $ 25,808 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 183,192 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping only. 14 352-222-02 VCA Vetenarian Hospital 195 1,320 $89.00 50% $44.50 10% 2 $ 8,678 $ - $ 11,748 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 30,426 Commercial Use Property - proposed impacts are contained to landscaping only. 41,547 3,555 83,563 $ 1,592,319 $ 69,198 $ 484,825 $ - $ - $ 235,000 $ 100,000 $ 2,481,342 Sub Total $ 496,268
$ 2,977,610
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD & SAVI RANCH WIDENING PROJECTS
CITY OF YORBA LINDA
ROW ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE - ALTERNATIVE 1
SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
CONTINGENCY (20%)
TOTAL ROW
ACQUISITION ESTIMATE
RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE
ALTERNATIVE 1
TOTAL ROW COST PER
PROJECT REPORT & TECH MEMO:
DIFFERENCE:
$ 3,603,000
($ 625,000)
TOTAL ROW COST PER
UPDATED ROW ESTIMATE:
DIFFERENCE:
$ 3,969,000
($ 992,000)
PROP ROAD
EASEMENT
PROP FOOTING
EASEMENT
RETAINING WALL SECTION (TYP)
NTS
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+00
15+00
16+00
74+00
EXIST R/W
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X
X X X X X X X
X
V V V V V V
V V V V V V V V V
V V V V V V V V V
V V V V V V V V V V V
SAVI RANCH PKWY
STAPLES
PETSMART
15' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
10' SCE EASEMENT
3.5 ± CITY OF YORBA LINDA PUBLIC
STREET. HIGHWAY, DRAINAGE,
LANDSCAPING, PUBLIC SERVICES &
UTILITY EASEMENT
COUNTY OF ORANGE R/W & STREET,
HIGHWAY & STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
5' CITY OF YORBA LINDA
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
5' CITY OF YORBA LINDA
PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT
30' OCSD
UNDERGROUND PUBLIC
SEWER EASEMENT
10' CITY OF YORBA LINDA
SIGN EASEMENT
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
PROP EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC STREET,
DRAINAGE, PUBLIC SERVICES & UTILITY
EASEMENT
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
10' SCE EASEMENT
5' SCE EASEMENT
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
PROP EASEMENT FOR
PUBLIC STREET, DRAINAGE,
PUBLIC SERVICES & UTILITY
EASEMENT
27'
24'
27'
SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING
EASEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR PETSMART & STAPLES
Scale: 1"=20'
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT = 27,705 SF
ROADWAY & UTILITY PUBLIC EASEMENT = 5,726 SF
11,484 sf
Construct retaining wall from street
side to avoid temporary construction
easement within parking lot. 11,484 sf
reduction in TCE need, reduced loss of
goodwill/severance damages.
SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING
REVISED RIGHT OF WAY REQUIREMENTS MAP
Change wall type per
Proposal to avoid TCE
within parking lot
NOTE: BASE INFORMATION FROM SAVI RANCH PARKWAY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Page 373 of 389 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00
39+00
40+00
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00
47+00
48+00
X
X
X
X X
X X X X X
X
V
V
V V
STAIRS
MIRAGE ST
10' SCE EASEMENT 15' CITY OF YORBA LINDA
SEWER EASEMENT
EXIST R/W
OLD CANAL RD
SAVI RANCH PKWY
OCFCD EASEMENT
30' OCSD
UNDERGROUND PUBLIC
SEWER EASEMENT
5' CITY OF
YORBA LINDA
PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROP EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC STREET,
DRAINAGE, PUBLIC SERVICES & UTILITY
EASEMENT
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING
EASEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR SPROUTS
Scale: 1"=20'
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT = 2,273 SF
ROADWAY & UTILITY PUBLIC EASEMENT = 249 SF
SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING
REVISED RIGHT OF WAY REQUIREMENTS MAP
NOTE: BASE INFORMATION FROM SAVI RANCH PARKWAY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Page 374 of 389
V V V V
V
V V
V V
V V
V V V V V V V
V V V V
V V V
V
V V V V V
V
V V V
V
V V
V V
V
V V V V V V
V
V
V V V
V V
V
V V
V V
V V
V
V
V
X X
X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X X
X
X X
X X X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X
X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X
X
X
X X X
X
X X X X
N 2,265,200
U STAIRS
STAIRS
32+00
33+00
34+00
35+00
36+00
37+00
38+00
39+00
40+00
41+00
42+00
10+00
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+00
15+00
16+00
17+00
18+00
19+00
20+00
40+00
41+00
42+00
43+00
44+00
45+00 46+00
47+00
48+00
60+00
61+00 62+00 63+00 64+00 65+00 66+00
67+00
68+00
69+00
70+00
71+00
72+00
73+00
74+00
75+00
76+00
77+00
78+00
72+00
73+00
74+00
25' YLWD PIPELINE
EASEMENT
EXIST R/W
YORBA LINDA BLVD
SAVI RANCH PKWY
STAPLES
PETSMART
SPROUTS
OLD CANAL RD
CRYSTAL DR
SAVI RANCH PKWY
MIRAGE ST
YORBA LINDA BLVD
15' STORM DRAIN
EASEMENT
10' SCE
EASEMENT
3.5 ± CITY OF YORBA LINDA
PUBLIC STREET. HIGHWAY,
DRAINAGE, LANDSCAPING,
PUBLIC SERVICES &
UTILITY EASEMENT
COUNTY OF
ORANGE R/W &
STREET, HIGHWAY
& STORM DRAIN
EASEMENT
COUNTY OF
ORANGE EASEMENT
OCFCD EASEMENT
COUNTY OF
ORANGE EASEMENT
25' YLWD PIPELINE
EASEMENT
10' SCE EASEMENT
30' OCSD UNDERGROUND
PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT
15' CITY OF YORBA
LINDA SEWER
EASEMENT
CITY OF YORBA LINDA
PUMP STATION EASEMENT
25' YLWD PIPELINE
EASEMENT
EASEMENT FOR
PUBLIC STREET,
DRAINAGE, PUBLIC
SERVICES & UTILITY
EASEMENT
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
10' SCE
EASEMENT
EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC
STREET, DRAINAGE, PUBLIC
SERVICES & UTILITY
EASEMENT
EXIST R/W CITY OF YORBA LINDA
CITY OF ANAHEIM
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE LA PALMA AVE
CITY OF YORBA LINDA
CITY OF ANAHEIM
APN: 351-042-32
APN:
351-042-08/10/15/16
APN: 352-211-20 APN: 352-111-05
APN: 352-112-04
APN: 352-113-01
APN:
352-117-01/02/03
APN: 352-117-04
PROPERTY LINE
APN: 352-111-24
Assessor Parcel
Number
Acquisition
Type Area
LEGEND
* NOTE: Right-of-way impacts shown are based
on the preliminary design and are
subject to change during design.
PE: Permanent Easement
FE: Footing Easement
TCE: Temporary Construction Easement
351-042-32
351-042-08 &
351-042-10 &
351-042-15 &
351-042-16
352-211-20
352-111-05
352-117-01 & 352-
117-02 & 352-117-03
352-117-04
352-112-04
352-113-01
PE 9,135 SF
PE
TCE
6,374 SF
6,972 SF
FE 694 SF
PE
TCE
16,843 SF
14,236 SF
FE 2,305 SF
PE
TCE
3,554 SF
5,062 SF
PE
TCE
7,823 SF
16,057 SF
PE
TCE
1,629 SF
537 SF
PE
TCE
2,171 SF
3,740 SF
PE
TCE
1,840 SF
1,611 SF
FE 2 SF
FE 235 SF
352-111-24 PE
TCE
455 SF
427 SF
FE 340 SF
FE 351 SF
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD / WEIR CANYON ROAD WIDENING
RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIREMENTS
NTS
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
REVISED RIGHT OF WAY REQUIREMENTS MAP
County of Orange Easement
for Roadway Purposes
Existing 3' Irrevocable Dedication
for Road & Utility Purposes
3' Additional Roadway
Easement
Additional Temporary
Construction Easement
SEE PARCEL MAP
92-172 ON FOLLOWING
PAGE FOR EXISTING
EASEMENT DETAILS
Reduced Footing
Easement (Typ)
Reduced Roadway
Easement (to TCE)
Reduced Roadway
Easement (to TCE)
Reduced TCE
NOTE: BASE INFORMATION FROM YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD PROJECT REPORT Page 375 of 389 Location of additional roadway
easement need, 6' west of existing
ROW (3' west of 3' dedication line)
Exist ROW
Exist 3' Dedication
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
X X X X
X X
V
V V
V V V V V V
V
V V V V
V V V V V V
V V V V
V V V V V
V V
V
37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00
84+00 85+00 86+00 87+00 88+00 89+00 90+00 91+00 92+00 93+00 94+00 95+00 96+00 97+00 98+00 99+00 SANTA ANA CANYON RD
WEIR CANYON RD
APN: 354-082-05
SR-91 FREEWAY
APN:
354-451-22
354-082-07/08
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
EXIST R/W
EXIST R/W
Assessor Parcel
Number
Acquisition
Type LEGEND Area
* NOTE: Right-of-way impacts shown are based
on the preliminary design and are
subject to change during design.
TCE: Temporary Construction Easement 354-082-05
354-451-22 &
354-082-07 &
354-082-08
TCE 2,050 SF
TCE 1,765 SF
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD / WEIR CANYON ROAD WIDENING
RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIREMENTS
NTS
YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
REVISED RIGHT OF WAY REQUIREMENTS MAP
NOTE: BASE INFORMATION FROM YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD PROJECT REPORT Page 377 of 389 San José • Carmel • Cupertino • Fresno • Inland Empire • Irvine Lakewood • Oakland • Roseville • Sacramento • Walnut Creek markthomas.com
IRVINE
2121 Alton Parkway, Suite 210
Irvine, CA 92606 • (949) 477-9000
2284/009410-1001
10434958.1 a10/25/22 -16-
EXHIBIT B
SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
Payment shall be on a “Fixed Fee” basis in accordance with the Consultants Schedule of Compensation attached herewith for the work tasks performed in conformance with Section 2.2 of the Agreement. Total compensation for all work under this contract shall not exceed Two Million Five Hundred Nineteen Thousand, Six Hundred Thirteen Dollars ($2,519,613.00) except as specified in Section 1.2 - Changes and Additions to Scope of Services of the Agreement.
Prime Consultant Team - PROJECT FEE BY TASK BY PERSONNEL Sr. Engineering Manager Sr. Project Manager Technical Lead Sr. Project Engineer Project Engineer Design Engineer II Design Engineer I Sr. Technician LAUD Project Manager Landscape Architect Landscape Designer II Landscape Designer I Sr. Project Coordinator C-BELOW Psomas CWE LEIGHTON LSA MONUMENT NCM Q3 Sub MarkUp
$332 $239 $195 $168 $147 $128 $105 $130 $189 $133 $106 $85 $130 Non-DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE 0%
1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/MEETINGS (9 Months)
1.1 Meetings 10 12 12 34 $7,952 - - - - - - - $0 $7,952
1.2 City/Community Meetings 5 5 10 $2,855 - - - - - - - $0 $2,855
1.3 Community Meetings 4 2 6 $1,806 - - - - - - - $0 $1,806
1.4 Third Party Coordination 2 2 $664 - - - - - - - - $0 $664
1.5 Progress Reporting 4 9 18 31 $5,819 - - - - - - - - $0 $5,819
1.6 Project Management Plan (PMP) 2 8 10 $2,576 - - - - - - - - $0 $2,576 Subtotal Phase 1 27 36 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 93 $21,672 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,672
2.0 PERMITTING
2.1 Encroachment Permits (Yorba Linda) 2 2 $294 - - - - - - - - $0 $294 Subtotal Phase 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 $294 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $294
3.0 BASELINE DATA COLLECTION
3.1 Data Collection 2 4 4 10 $1,486 - - - - - - - - $0 $1,486
3.2 Utility Potholing 2 2 2 6 $982 7,106 - - - - - - - $0 $8,088
3.3 Geotechnical Investigations/Reporting $0
3.3.1 Field Investigations 0 $0 - - - 13,659 - - - - $0 $13,659
3.3.2 Geotechnical Analysis 0 $0 - - - 6,826 - - - - $0 $6,826
3.3.3 Summary Report 2 2 $478 - - - 7,198 - - - $0 $7,676
3.4 Utility Coordination 2 2 12 32 48 $6,266 - - - - - - - - $0 $6,266
3.5 Survey Control
3.5.1 Survey Control, Design Survey, ROW Mapping 2 2 2 6 $1,436 - 19,000 - - - - - - $0 $20,436
3.6 ROW Mapping/Acquisition - - - - - - - - $0
3.6.1 ROW Support and Estimating 2 2 4 $1,142 - - - - - 2,810 - - $0 $3,952
3.6.2 Legal Description & Plats (assumed 4 with 2 PTRs) 0 $0 - 10,500 - - - - - - $0 $10,500
3.7 Hydrology/Hydraulics Study
3.7.1 Hydrology/Hydraulics Study 2 2 $294 - - 5,164 - - - - - $0 $5,458
3.7.2 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 2 2 $294 - - 6,927 - - - - - $0 $7,221
3.8 Traffic Management Plan 2 2 $390 - - - - 9,640 - - - $0 $10,030 Subtotal Phase 3 6 12 2 0 24 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 $12,768 $7,106 $29,500 $12,091 $27,683 $9,640 $2,810 $0 $0 $0 $101,598
4.0 FINAL ENGINEERING PS&E (65%, 90%, and 100%)
4.1 Construction Plans (41 Sheets) - - - - - - - - $0
4.1.1 Title Sheet and General Notes 1 2 8 11 $1,373 - - - - - - - - $0 $1,373
4.1.2 Typical Sections 1 2 12 8 23 $3,414 - - - - - - - - $0 $3,414
4.1.3 Removals 1 2 12 24 39 $5,094 - - - - - - - - $0 $5,094
4.1.4 Plan and Profile 2 6 48 100 156 $19,654 - - - - - - - - $0 $19,654
4.1.5 Drainage Improvements 6 36 42 $4,662 - - - - - - - - $0 $4,662
4.1.6 Off-Site Improvements Plans 2 4 24 46 76 $9,978 - - - - - - - - $0 $9,978
4.1.7 Construction Details 2 4 24 50 80 $10,398 - - - - - - - - $0 $10,398
4.1.8 Striping Plan 1 2 4 8 20 35 $4,866 - - - - - - - - $0 $4,866
4.1.9 Traffic Signal Modification 1 2 24 24 60 111 $15,318 - - - - - - - - $0 $15,318
4.1.10 Street Lighting 2 16 8 30 56 $7,924 - - - - - - - - $0 $7,924
4.1.11 Construction Staging with Traffic Handling 2 4 24 36 80 146 $19,992 - - - - - - - - $0 $19,992
4.1.12 Retaining Wall Plans 2 2 24 30 100 120 278 $36,262 - - - 2,087 - - - - $0 $38,349
4.1.13 Planting & Irrigation (Private & Public) 20 40 80 100 240 $26,080 - - - - - - - - $0 $26,080
4.1.14 Cross Sections 2 8 24 34 $4,174 - - - - - - - - $0 $4,174 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. - Detailed Labor and Fee Breakdown City of Yorba Linda
Final Engineering Design and Environmental Services for the Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project Total MT
Cost
Subconsultants
TOTAL COST
Total
Hours
Revision Date: 10/24/2022 Page 380 of 389 Page 1 of 2
Prime Consultant Team - PROJECT FEE BY TASK BY PERSONNEL Sr. Engineering Manager Sr. Project Manager Technical Lead Sr. Project Engineer Project Engineer Design Engineer II Design Engineer I Sr. Technician LAUD Project Manager Landscape Architect Landscape Designer II Landscape Designer I Sr. Project Coordinator C-BELOW Psomas CWE LEIGHTON LSA MONUMENT NCM Q3 Sub MarkUp
$332 $239 $195 $168 $147 $128 $105 $130 $189 $133 $106 $85 $130 Non-DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE 0% Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. - Detailed Labor and Fee Breakdown City of Yorba Linda
Final Engineering Design and Environmental Services for the Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project Total MT
Cost
Subconsultants
TOTAL COST
Total
Hours
4.2 Technical Specs/Special Provisions 2 12 18 16 24 72 $13,258 - - - - - - - - $0 $13,258
4.3 Engineer's Estimate/Construction Cost 2 8 6 8 24 18 24 90 $13,442 - - - - - - - - $0 $13,442
4.4 Construction Schedule/Working Day Analysis 4 4 8 16 $3,628 - - - - - - - - $0 $3,628 Subtotal Phase 4 22 57 116 62 260 118 630 0 20 40 80 100 0 1505 $199,517 $0 $0 $0 $2,087 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $201,604 TOTAL DESIGN HOURS 55 105 118 62 298 118 668 0 20 40 80 100 18 1682 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
DESIGN COST $18,260 $25,095 $23,010 $10,416 $43,806 $15,104 $70,140 $0 $3,780 $5,320 $8,480 $8,500 $2,340 $234,751 $7,106 $29,500 $12,091 $29,770 $9,640 $2,810 $0 $0 $0 $325,668
5.0 ADVERTISEMENT/BIDDING SUPPORT
5.1 Advertisement/Bidding Support 2 4 4 10 $2,208 - - - - - - - - $0 $2,208 Subtotal Phase 5 2 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 $2,208 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,208
6.0 CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
6.1 Meetings 2 2 2 6 $1,436 - - - - - - - - $0 $1,436
6.2 Request for Information Responses (RFI) 4 20 24 $3,896 - - - - - - - - $0 $3,896
6.3 Shop Drawing/Submittal Reviews 4 20 24 $3,896 - - - - - - - - $0 $3,896
6.4 Change Order Support 2 4 16 22 $3,972 - - - - - - - - $0 $3,972
6.5 As-Built Plans 2 2 24 28 $3,292 - - - - - - - - $0 $3,292 Subtotal Phase 6 4 16 0 0 60 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 $16,492 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,492 TOTAL BID & CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT HOURS 6 20 0 0 64 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT COST $1,992 $4,780 $0 $0 $9,408 $0 $2,520 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,700 TOTAL HOUR & COST SUMMARY:
TOTAL HOURS 61 125 118 62 362 118 692 0 20 40 80 100 18 1796 OTHER DIRECT COSTS (Repro + Title Reports) $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 TOTAL COST $20,252 $29,875 $23,010 $10,416 $53,214 $15,104 $72,660 $0 $3,780 $5,320 $8,480 $8,500 $2,340 $0 $253,451 $7,106 $29,500 $12,091 $29,770 $9,640 $2,810 $0 $0 $0 $344,368 Revision Date: 10/24/2022 Page 381 of 389 Page 2 of 2
Prime Consultant Team - PROJECT FEE BY TASK BY PERSONNEL Sr. Engineering Manager Sr. Project Manager Technical Lead Sr. Project Engineer Project Engineer Design Engineer II Design Engineer I Sr. Technician LAUD Project Manager Landscape Architect Landscape Designer II Landscape Designer I Sr. Project Coordinator C-BELOW Psomas CWE LEIGHTON LSA MONUMENT NCM Q3 $332 $239 $195 $168 $147 $128 $105 $130 $189 $133 $106 $85 $130 Non-DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE
1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/MEETINGS
1.1 Meetings 48 48 48 144 $34,464 - - - - 6,080 - 15,000 - $55,544
1.2 City/Community Meetings 12 6 8 26 $6,594 - - - - - - - - $6,594
1.3 Community Meetings 8 4 12 $3,612 - - - - - - - - $3,612
1.4 Third Party Coordination 4 4 8 16 $3,460 - - - - 10,010 - - - $13,470
1.5 Progress Reporting 12 12 48 72 $13,092 - - - - - - - $13,092
1.6 Project Management Plan (PMP) 8 12 20 $5,524 - - - - - - - - $5,524 Subtotal Phase 1 92 86 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 290 $66,746 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,090 $0 $15,000 $0 $97,836
2.0 PERMITTING
2.1 Caltrans Encroachment Permit 4 10 30 44 $8,128 - - - - - - - - $8,128
2.2 OCFCD Encroachment Permit 8 10 30 48 $9,456 - - - - - - - - $9,456
2.3 Regulatory Permitting - Project Construction - - - - - - -
2.3.1 Section 408 Permitting Assistance 12 32 40 84 $17,512 - - - 5,795 8,035 - 2,904 25,108 $59,354
2.3.2 Focused Environmental Assessment (EA) 1 2 3 $810 - - - 27,060 - - $27,870
2.3.3 Section 106 Cultural Resources Study 1 2 3 $810 - - - 11,705 - - $12,515
2.3.4 Pre-Application Agency Coordination 1 2 3 $810 - - - 9,455 - - $10,265
2.3.5 Section 404 Pre-Construction Notification 1 2 3 $810 - - - 8,860 - - $9,670
2.3.6 Section 401 Water Quality Certification Application 1 2 3 $810 - - - 8,860 - - $9,670
2.3.7 Section 401 Alternatives Analysis 1 2 3 $810 - - - 9,480 - - $10,290
2.3.8 Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 1 2 3 $810 - - - 21,770 - - $22,580
2.3.9 Section 1602 Notification of Streambed Alteration 1 2 3 $810 - - - 10,100 - - $10,910
2.3.10 Post-Submittal Agency Coordination 1 2 3 $810 - - - 12,285 - - $13,095
2.3.11 Maternity-Season Bat Survey and Reporting 1 2 3 $810 - - - 4,943 - - $5,753
2.3.12 Bat Mitigation and Management Plan 1 2 3 $810 - - - 6,970 - - $7,780
2.4 Regulatory Permitting - Geotechnical Borings 0 $0 - - - - - - - -
2.4.1 408 Permitting Assistance (Geotech. Borings) 12 12 12 36 $8,616 - - - 3,863 8,035 - - - $20,514
2.4.2 Pre-Application Agency Coordination (Geotech. Borings) 1 2 3 $810 - - - - 9,755 - - - $10,565
2.4.3 404 Pre-Construction Notification (Geotech. Borings) 1 2 3 $810 - - - - 10,100 - - - $10,910
2.4.4 401 Notice of Intent (Geotech. Borings) 1 2 3 $810 - - - - 10,100 - - - $10,910
2.4.5 1602 Notification (Geotech. Borings) 1 2 3 $810 - - - - 10,100 - - - $10,910
2.4.6 Post-Submittal Agency Coordination (Geotech. Borings) 1 2 3 $810 - - - - 8,720 - - - $9,530 Subtotal Phase 2 52 96 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 260 $56,672 $0 $0 $0 $9,658 $196,333 $0 $2,904 $25,108 $290,675
3.0 BASELINE DATA COLLECTION
3.1 Data Collection 2 4 12 18 $2,326 - - - - - - - - $2,326
3.2 Utility Potholing 2 2 4 8 $1,192 21,000 - - - - - - - $22,192
3.3 Geotechnical Investigations/Reporting
3.3.1 Field Investigations 0 $0 - - - 82,840 - - - - $82,840
3.3.2 Geotechnical Analysis 0 $0 - - - 23,964 - - - - $23,964
3.3.3 Summary Report 2 4 6 $1,620 - - - 22,434 - - 2,500 - $26,554
3.3.4 Confirmation Boring, Lab Testing, Analyses & Final Report 2 4 6 $1,620 - - - 22,136 - - - $23,756
3.4 Utility Coordination 8 24 40 40 112 $18,472 - - - - - - - - $18,472
3.5 Survey Control - - - - - - - - $0
3.5.1 Survey Control, Design Survey, ROW Mapping 2 2 4 8 $1,730 - 60,000 - - - - - - $61,730
3.6 ROW Mapping/Acquisition - - - - - - - - $0
3.6.1 ROW Support & Estimating 2 2 4 $1,142 - - - - - 3,720 - - $4,862
3.6.2 Legal Descriptions & Plats (Assumed 25 with 7 PTRs) 0 $0 - 58,750 - - - - - - $58,750
3.7 Hydrology/Hydraulics 0 $0 - - - - - - - - $0
3.7.1 Roadway Hydrology/Hydraulics Study 2 2 4 $1,142 - - 26,670 - - - - - $27,812
3.7.2 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 2 2 4 $1,142 - - 30,738 - - - - - $31,880
3.7.3 River Hydraulics & Scour Analysis 2 2 4 $1,142 - - - - - - 2,500 40,887 $44,529
3.8 Traffic Management Plan 2 2 4 $1,142 - - - - 17,012 - - - $18,154
3.9 Geometric Refinements 12 24 48 84 $16,776 - - - - - - - $16,776 Subtotal Phase 3 36 72 0 0 98 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 262 $49,446 $21,000 $118,750 $57,408 $151,374 $17,012 $3,720 $5,000 $40,887 $464,596 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. - Detailed Labor and Fee Breakdown City of Yorba Linda
Final Engineering Design and Environmental Services for the Yorba Linda Blvd Widening Project Total MT
Cost
Subconsultants
TOTAL COST
Total
Hours
Revised: 10/24/2022
Prime Consultant Team - PROJECT FEE BY TASK BY PERSONNEL Sr. Engineering Manager Sr. Project Manager Technical Lead Sr. Project Engineer Project Engineer Design Engineer II Design Engineer I Sr. Technician LAUD Project Manager Landscape Architect Landscape Designer II Landscape Designer I Sr. Project Coordinator C-BELOW Psomas CWE LEIGHTON LSA MONUMENT NCM Q3 $332 $239 $195 $168 $147 $128 $105 $130 $189 $133 $106 $85 $130 Non-DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE DBE Non-DBE Non-DBE Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. - Detailed Labor and Fee Breakdown City of Yorba Linda
Final Engineering Design and Environmental Services for the Yorba Linda Blvd Widening Project Total MT
Cost
Subconsultants
TOTAL COST
Total
Hours
4.0 FINAL ENGINEERING - PS&E
4.1 Construction Plans (133 Sheets) - - - - - - - -
4.1.1 Title Sheet and General Notes 2 8 20 30 $3,754 - - - - - - - - $3,754
4.1.2 Typical Sections 4 16 56 76 $9,188 - - - - - - - - $9,188
4.1.3 Removals 4 8 32 240 284 $33,144 - - - - - - - - $33,144
4.1.4 Plan and Profile 12 40 200 500 752 $95,444 - - - - - - - - $95,444
4.1.5 Off-Street Bike or Trail Plans 4 8 16 24 52 $8,112 - - - - - - - - $8,112
4.1.6 Off-Site Improvement Plans 4 12 24 60 100 $14,024 - - - - - - - - $14,024
4.1.7 Drainage & Stormwater 4 12 24 60 100 $14,024 - - - - - - - - $14,024
4.1.8 Construction Details 4 16 40 88 148 $20,272 - - - - - - - - $20,272
4.1.10 River Mitigation Improvements 2 8 40 32 82 $11,816 - - - - - - - - $11,816
4.1.11 Striping Plans 4 8 16 52 120 200 $26,604 - - - - - - - - $26,604
4.1.12 Traffic Signal Modification 2 10 40 100 160 312 $42,354 - - - - - - - - $42,354
4.1.13 Street Lighting 2 4 12 30 140 188 $23,070 - - - - - - - - $23,070
4.1.14 Construction Staging with Traffic Handling 8 12 40 120 320 500 $64,564 - - - - - - - - $64,564
4.1.15 Retaining Wall Plans 4 40 110 4 170 180 508 $68,484 - - - 4,408 - - - - $72,892
4.1.16 Bridge Widening Plans 4 12 410 8 434 $85,322 - - - 6,694 - - 435,428 - $527,444
4.1.17 Miscellaneous Structures 28 50 172 140 390 $49,070 - - - - - - $49,070
4.1.18 Planting & Irrigation Plans 12 40 80 80 212 $22,868 - - - - - - - - $22,868
4.1.19 Cross Sections 2 8 24 40 74 $10,304 - - - - - - - - $10,304
4.2 Technical Specs/Special Provisions 8 40 20 40 50 16 174 $32,234 - - - - 13,480 - 10,968 - $56,682
4.3 Engineer's Estimate/Construction Cost 8 24 10 10 24 40 24 140 $23,190 - - - - - - 11,280 - $34,470
4.4 Construction Schedule/Working Day Analysis 8 8 16 32 $6,920 - - - - - - 2,480 - $9,400 Subtotal Phase 4 80 240 616 160 878 226 2236 140 12 40 80 80 0 4788 $664,762 $0 $0 $0 $11,102 $13,480 $0 $460,156 $0 $1,149,500 TOTAL DESIGN HOURS 260 494 616 160 1152 226 2292 140 12 40 80 80 48 5600 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,500 DESIGN COST $86,320 $118,066 $120,120 $26,880 $169,344 $28,928 $240,660 $18,200 $2,268 $5,320 $8,480 $6,800 $6,240 $838,126 $21,000 $118,750 $57,408 $172,134 $267,915 $3,720 $483,060 $65,995 $2,028,107
5.0 ADVERTISEMENT/BIDDING SUPPORT
5.1 Advertisement/Bidding Support 8 8 8 24 $5,744 - - - - - - 2,000 - $7,744 Subtotal Phase 5 8 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 $5,744 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $7,744
6.0 CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
6.1 Meetings 12 12 12 36 $8,616 - - - - - - 3,600 - $12,216
6.2 Biological Monitoring Services 0 $0 - - - - 9,140 - - $9,140
6.3 Request for Information Responses (RFI) 4 24 60 88 $15,884 - - - 4,500 - - 10,000 - $30,384
6.4 Shop Drawing/Submittal Reviews 4 24 40 68 $12,944 - - - 4,500 - - 13,500 - $30,944
6.5 Change Order Support 4 24 40 68 $12,944 - - - - - - 5,000 - $17,944
6.5 As-Built Plans 2 4 40 46 $5,266 - - - - - - 8,000 - $13,266 Subtotal Phase 6 24 86 0 0 156 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 306 $55,654 $0 $0 $0 $9,000 $9,140 $0 $40,100 $0 $113,894 TOTAL BID & CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT HOURS 32 94 0 0 164 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 330 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT COST $10,624 $22,466 $0 $0 $24,108 $0 $4,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $61,398 $0 $0 $0 $9,000 $9,140 $0 $42,100 $0 $121,638 TOTAL HOUR & COST SUMMARY:
TOTAL HOURS 292 588 616 160 1316 226 2332 140 12 40 80 80 48 5930 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,500 TOTAL COST $96,944 $140,532 $120,120 $26,880 $193,452 $28,928 $244,860 $18,200 $2,268 $5,320 $8,480 $6,800 $6,240 $0 $900,024 $21,000 $118,750 $57,408 $181,134 $297,055 $3,720 $525,160 $65,995 $2,175,245 Revised: 10/24/2022
2284/009410-1001
10434958.1 a10/25/22 -17-
EXHIBIT C
SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
Consultants Project Schedule is attached and made a part of this agreement. Consultant shall complete services presented within the scope of work contained within Exhibit “A” in accordance with the attached project schedule.
A P P E N D I X C .
PROJECT SCHEDULE
FINAL DESIGN OF THE YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
AND SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECTS
City of Yorba Linda
MARK THOMAS
ID WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Project 250 days Tue 10/18/22 Fri 10/13/23 2 Consultant Selection 0 days Tue 10/18/22 Tue 10/18/22 3 Kick-Off Meeting with City 0 days Tue 11/1/22 Tue 11/1/22 4 1.0 Project Management and Meetings 240 days Tue 11/1/22 Fri 10/13/23 5 1.1-1.5 Mgmt/Admin/Meetings/Reporting 12 mons Tue 11/1/22 Fri 10/13/23 6 1.6 Project Management Plan 10 days Tue 11/1/22 Tue 11/15/22 7 2.0 Permitting 20 days Tue 11/1/22 Thu 12/1/22
8 2.1 Encroachment Permits 20 days Tue 11/1/22 Thu 12/1/22 9 3.0 Baseline Data Collection 227 days Tue 11/8/22 Tue 10/3/23 10 3.1 Data Collection 10 days Tue 11/8/22 Tue 11/22/22 11 3.2 Potholing 25 days Wed 12/28/22 Thu 2/2/23
12 3.3 Geotechnical Report 70 days Fri 12/2/22 Tue 3/14/23 13 Conduct Data Collection and Geotechnical Analysis 20 days Fri 12/2/22 Fri 12/30/22 14 Prepare Draft Geotechnical Report 20 days Tue 1/3/23 Tue 1/31/23 15 City Review 10 days Wed 2/1/23 Tue 2/14/23
16 Revise, Review, and Approval 20 days Wed 2/15/23 Tue 3/14/23 17 3.4 Utility Coordination 227 days Tue 11/8/22 Tue 10/3/23 18 Request Utility Record Maps (A Letters) 5 days Tue 11/8/22 Tue 11/15/22 19 Receive Utility Information 20 days Wed 11/16/22 Thu 12/15/22 20 Prepare Existing Utility Base Map 15 days Fri 12/16/22 Mon 1/9/23 21 Prepare Notice of Conflict Letters (B Letters) 5 days Fri 2/3/23 Thu 2/9/23 22 Utility Relocation Coordination 40 days Fri 2/10/23 Thu 4/6/23 23 Prepare Notice to Owners to Relocate (C Letters) 5 days Fri 4/7/23 Thu 4/13/23 24 Utility Company Agreements/Concurrence Response120 days Fri 4/14/23 Tue 10/3/23 25 3.5 Survey Control 20 days Tue 11/1/22 Thu 12/1/22
26 Establish Project Control 5 days Tue 11/1/22 Mon 11/7/22 27 Field Survey 15 days Tue 11/8/22 Thu 12/1/22
28 3.6 Right of Way Mapping and Engineering 87 days Tue 11/8/22 Thu 3/16/23 29 Obtain Preliminary Title Reports 20 days Tue 11/8/22 Thu 12/8/22 30 LandNet Mapping 20 days Fri 12/9/22 Mon 1/9/23
31 Determine Right-of-Way Requirements/Conflicts 20 days Fri 1/20/23 Thu 2/16/23 32 Plats & Legal Descriptions 20 days Fri 2/17/23 Thu 3/16/23 33 3.7 Hydrology & Hydraulics Study 60 days Thu 1/5/23 Thu 3/30/23 34 Prepare and Submit Draft Drainage Report 30 days Thu 1/5/23 Thu 2/16/23 35 City Review 10 days Fri 2/17/23 Thu 3/2/23
36 Revise, Review, and Approval 20 days Fri 3/3/23 Thu 3/30/23 37 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 60 days Thu 1/5/23 Thu 3/30/23 38 Prepare and Submit Draft WQMP 30 days Thu 1/5/23 Thu 2/16/23 39 City Review 10 days Fri 2/17/23 Thu 3/2/23
40 Revise, Review, and Approval 20 days Fri 3/3/23 Thu 3/30/23 41 3.8 Transportation Management Plan (TMP) 60 days Thu 1/5/23 Thu 3/30/23 10/18
11/1
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 2023
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Path Driving Predecessor Milestone Task
Path Driving Predecessor Summary Task
Path Driving Predecessor Normal Task
Progress
Manual Progress
City/Agency Activity
Critical City/Agency Activity
Savi Ranch Parkway Widening
Draft Schedule
Minor impacts related to SCE
street lighting and AT&T vault
on Savi Ranch Parkway will
facilitate this process.
Our approach to the retaining
wall type will greatly reduce the
temporary right of way needs.
Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Schedule
FINAL DESIGN OF THE YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
AND SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECTS
City of Yorba Linda
MARK THOMAS
ID WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish
42 Prepare and Submit Draft TMP 30 days Thu 1/5/23 Thu 2/16/23 43 City Review 10 days Fri 2/17/23 Thu 3/2/23
44 Revise, Review, and Approval 20 days Fri 3/3/23 Thu 3/30/23 45 4.0 Final Engineering (PS&E) 219 days Fri 12/2/22 Thu 10/12/23 46 65% PS&E 62 days Fri 12/2/22 Thu 3/2/23
47 4.1 Prepare 65% Plans 42 days Fri 12/2/22 Thu 2/2/23 48 4.2 Special Provisions 10 days Fri 1/20/23 Thu 2/2/23 49 4.3 Quantities & Estimate 10 days Fri 1/20/23 Thu 2/2/23 50 4.4 Construction Schedule/Working Day Analysis 10 days Fri 1/20/23 Thu 2/2/23 51 QA/QC Process 10 days Fri 2/3/23 Thu 2/16/23
52 65% Submittal 0 days Thu 2/16/23 Thu 2/16/23
53 City Review 10 days Fri 2/17/23 Thu 3/2/23
54 90% PS&E 42 days Fri 3/3/23 Mon 5/1/23
55 4.1 Prepare 95% PS&E 22 days Fri 3/3/23 Mon 4/3/23
56 4.2 Special Provisions 10 days Tue 3/21/23 Mon 4/3/23 57 4.3 Quantities & Estimate 10 days Tue 3/21/23 Mon 4/3/23 58 4.4 Construction Schedule/Working Day Analysis 10 days Tue 3/21/23 Mon 4/3/23 59 QA/QC Process 10 days Tue 4/4/23 Mon 4/17/23
60 90% Submittal 0 days Mon 4/17/23 Mon 4/17/23
61 City Review 10 days Tue 4/18/23 Mon 5/1/23
62 100% PS&E 60 days Tue 5/2/23 Wed 7/26/23
63 4.1 Prepare 100% PS&E 40 days Tue 5/2/23 Tue 6/27/23 64 4.2 Special Provisions 10 days Wed 6/14/23 Tue 6/27/23 65 4.3 Quantities & Estimate 10 days Wed 6/14/23 Tue 6/27/23 66 4.4 Construction Schedule/Working Day Analysis 10 days Wed 6/14/23 Tue 6/27/23 67 QA/QC Process 10 days Wed 6/28/23 Wed 7/12/23
68 100% Submittal 0 days Wed 7/12/23 Wed 7/12/23
69 City Review 10 days Thu 7/13/23 Wed 7/26/23
70 Final PS&E 55 days Thu 7/27/23 Thu 10/12/23
71 Prepare Final PS&E 45 days Thu 7/27/23 Thu 9/28/23
72 Final Submittal 0 days Thu 9/28/23 Thu 9/28/23
73 City Reviews and Final PS&E 10 days Fri 9/29/23 Thu 10/12/23 74 ROW Funding - OCTA CTFP 2023 Funding 210 days Mon 9/19/22 Wed 7/19/23 78 Right of Way Acquisition 9 mons Thu 7/20/23 Wed 4/3/24 79 CON Funding 219 days Tue 9/19/23 Thu 7/25/24
80 OCTA CTFP 2024 Funding 210 days Tue 9/19/23 Fri 7/12/24 84 SB-1 LPP 2024 Funding 190 days Mon 10/30/23 Thu 7/25/24 88 City Council Approval - PS&E 0 days Thu 7/25/24 Thu 7/25/24 89 5.0 Bid and Award (Bid Support) 4 mons Mon 8/5/24 Fri 11/22/24 90 6.0 Begin Construction Phase 0 days Fri 11/22/24 Fri 11/22/24 2/16
4/17
7/12
9/28
7/25
11/22
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 2023
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Path Driving Predecessor Milestone Task
Path Driving Predecessor Summary Task
Path Driving Predecessor Normal Task
Progress
Manual Progress
City/Agency Activity
Critical City/Agency Activity
Savi Ranch Parkway Widening
Draft Schedule
Right of way and construction are contingent
upon funding. Mark Thomas will continue
to assist the City in developing the funding
strategies for the project, timing these to
closely align when the funds are needed for
both activities.
Savi Ranch Parkway Widening Schedule (cont.)
FINAL DESIGN OF THE YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
AND SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECTS
City of Yorba Linda
MARK THOMAS
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Schedule
ID WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Project 652 days Mon 9/19/22 Tue 4/15/25 2 Consultant Selection 0 days Tue 10/18/22 Tue 10/18/22 3 Kick-Off Meeting with City 0 days Tue 11/1/22 Tue 11/1/22 4 1.0 Project Management and Meetings 360 days Tue 11/1/22 Fri 4/5/24 5 1.1-1.5 Mgmt/Admin/Meetings/Reporting 18 mons Tue 11/1/22 Fri 4/5/24 6 1.6 Project Management Plan 10 days Tue 11/1/22 Tue 11/15/22 7 2.0 Permitting 530 days Tue 11/8/22 Fri 12/13/24
8 2.1 Caltrans Encroachment Permit 15 days Tue 11/8/22 Thu 12/1/22 9 2.2 OCFCD Encroachment Permit 20 days Tue 11/8/22 Thu 12/8/22 10 2.3 Regulatory Permitting 485 days Tue 1/17/23 Fri 12/13/24 11 Pre-Application Meeting with Agencies (408, 404, 401, and 1602 Permits) 0 days Tue 1/17/23 Tue 1/17/23 12 Assemble USACE 408 Permit Application 10 days Wed 5/3/23 Tue 5/16/23 13 Draft Environmental Assessment 50 days Wed 3/8/23 Tue 5/16/23 14 USACE 408 Review/Revisions/Approval with 404 20 mons Wed 5/17/23 Fri 12/13/24 15 Obtain Regulatory Permits (401, 1602) 10 mons Mon 3/4/24 Fri 12/13/24 16 3.0 Baseline Data Collection 275 days Tue 11/8/22 Wed 12/13/23 17 3.1 Data Collection 10 days Tue 11/8/22 Tue 11/22/22 18 3.2 Potholing 25 days Wed 3/8/23 Tue 4/11/23
19 3.3 Geotechnical Report 70 days Fri 12/9/22 Tue 3/21/23 20 Conduct Data Collection and Geotechnical Analysis 20 days Fri 12/9/22 Mon 1/9/23 21 Prepare Draft Geotechnical Report 20 days Tue 1/10/23 Tue 2/7/23 22 City Review 10 days Wed 2/8/23 Tue 2/21/23
23 Revise, Review, and Approval 20 days Wed 2/22/23 Tue 3/21/23 24 3.4 Utility Coordination 275 days Tue 11/8/22 Wed 12/13/23 25 Request Utility Record Maps (A Letters) 10 days Tue 11/8/22 Tue 11/22/22 26 Receive Utility Information 20 days Wed 11/23/22 Thu 12/22/22 27 Prepare Existing Utility Base Map 15 days Fri 12/23/22 Tue 1/17/23 28 Prepare Notice of Conflict Letters (B Letters) 5 days Wed 4/12/23 Tue 4/18/23 29 Utility Relocation Coordination 40 days Wed 4/19/23 Wed 6/14/23 30 Prepare Notice to Owners to Relocate (C Letters) 5 days Thu 6/15/23 Wed 6/21/23 31 Utility Company Agreements/Concurrence Response 120 days Thu 6/22/23 Wed 12/13/23 32 3.5 Survey Control 25 days Tue 11/8/22 Thu 12/15/22
33 Establish Project Control 5 days Tue 11/8/22 Tue 11/15/22 34 Field Survey 20 days Wed 11/16/22 Thu 12/15/22
35 Aerial Topography Augmentation 25 days Tue 11/8/22 Thu 12/15/22 36 3.6 Right of Way Mapping and Engineering 140 days Tue 11/8/22 Wed 5/31/23 37 Obtain Preliminary Title Reports 20 days Tue 11/8/22 Thu 12/8/22 38 LandNet Mapping 20 days Fri 12/9/22 Mon 1/9/23
39 Determine Right of Way Requirements/Conflicts 20 days Wed 4/5/23 Tue 5/2/23 40 Plats and Legal Descriptions 20 days Wed 5/3/23 Wed 5/31/23 41 3.7 Hydrology and Hydraulics Study 80 days Wed 3/22/23 Thu 7/13/23 42 Prepare and Submit Draft Drainage Report 30 days Wed 3/22/23 Tue 5/2/23 43 City Review 10 days Wed 5/3/23 Tue 5/16/23
44 Revise, Review, and Approval 40 days Wed 5/17/23 Thu 7/13/23 45 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 80 days Wed 3/22/23 Thu 7/13/23 46 Prepare and Submit Draft WQMP 30 days Wed 3/22/23 Tue 5/2/23 47 City Review 10 days Wed 5/3/23 Tue 5/16/23
10/18
11/1
1/17
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 2023
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Path Driving Predecessor Milestone Task
Path Driving Predecessor Summary Task
Path Driving Predecessor Normal Task
Critical
Critical Split
Progress
Manual Progress
City/Agency Activity
Critical City/Agency Activity
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening
Draft Schedule
By avoiding geotechnical borings within the river, we avoid a 10-12 month USACE Section 408 permit process and only need an OCFCD permit for being within their right of way.
We have successfully used this strategy on the Doran Street Grade Separation and OC Streetcar projects.
Having the strength
of both LSA and Q3
Consulting will benefit
the City in facilitating
the extensive permitting
requirements on this
project.
FINAL DESIGN OF THE YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING
AND SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECTS
City of Yorba Linda
MARK THOMAS
ID WBS Task Name Duration Start Finish
48 Revise, Review, and Approval 40 days Wed 5/17/23 Thu 7/13/23 49 River Hydraulic and Scour Analysis 80 days Wed 3/22/23 Thu 7/13/23 50 Prepare and Submit Draft River Hydraulic and Scour Analysis 30 days Wed 3/22/23 Tue 5/2/23 51 City Review 10 days Wed 5/3/23 Tue 5/16/23
52 Revise, Review, and Approval 40 days Wed 5/17/23 Thu 7/13/23 53 3.8 Traffic Management Plan (TMP) 170 days Tue 11/8/22 Thu 7/13/23 54 Prepare and Submit Draft TMP 20 days Wed 4/5/23 Tue 5/2/23 55 City Review 10 days Wed 5/3/23 Tue 5/16/23
56 Revise, Review, and Approval 40 days Wed 5/17/23 Thu 7/13/23 57 3.9 Geometric Refinement 25 days Tue 11/8/22 Thu 12/15/22 58 4.0 Final Engineering PS&E 305 days Fri 12/16/22 Fri 3/1/24 59 65% PS&E 105 days Fri 12/16/22 Tue 5/16/23
60 4.1 Prepare 65% Plans 80 days Fri 12/16/22 Tue 4/11/23 61 4.2 Special Provisions 10 days Wed 3/29/23 Tue 4/11/23 62 4.3 Quantities & Estimate 10 days Wed 3/29/23 Tue 4/11/23 63 4.4 Construction Schedule/Working Day Analysis 10 days Wed 3/29/23 Tue 4/11/23 64 QA/QC Process 15 days Wed 4/12/23 Tue 5/2/23
65 65% Submittal 0 days Tue 5/2/23 Tue 5/2/23
66 City Review 10 days Wed 5/3/23 Tue 5/16/23
67 90% PS&E 100 days Wed 5/17/23 Fri 10/6/23
68 4.1 Prepare 95% PS&E 80 days Wed 5/17/23 Fri 9/8/23
69 4.2 Special Provisions 10 days Fri 8/25/23 Fri 9/8/23 70 4.3 Quantities & Estimate 10 days Fri 8/25/23 Fri 9/8/23 71 4.4 Construction Schedule/Working Day Analysis 10 days Fri 8/25/23 Fri 9/8/23 72 QA/QC Process 10 days Mon 9/11/23 Fri 9/22/23
73 90% Submittal 0 days Fri 9/22/23 Fri 9/22/23
74 City Review 10 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 10/6/23
75 100% PS&E 60 days Mon 10/9/23 Fri 1/5/24
76 4.1 Prepare 100% PS&E 40 days Mon 10/9/23 Wed 12/6/23 77 4.2 Special Provisions 10 days Tue 11/21/23 Wed 12/6/23 78 4.3 Quantities & Estimate 10 days Tue 11/21/23 Wed 12/6/23 79 4.4 Construction Schedule/Working Day Analysis 10 days Tue 11/21/23 Wed 12/6/23 80 QA/QC Process 10 days Thu 12/7/23 Wed 12/20/23
81 100% Submittal 0 days Wed 12/20/23 Wed 12/20/23
82 City Review 10 days Thu 12/21/23 Fri 1/5/24
83 Final PS&E 40 days Mon 1/8/24 Fri 3/1/24
84 Prepare Final PS&E 30 days Mon 1/8/24 Fri 2/16/24
85 Final Submittal 0 days Fri 2/16/24 Fri 2/16/24
86 City Reviews and Final PS&E 10 days Mon 2/19/24 Fri 3/1/24 87 ROW Funding - OCTA CTFP 2023 Funding 210 days Mon 9/19/22 Wed 7/19/23 91 Right of Way Acquisition 12 mons Thu 7/20/23 Fri 6/28/24 92 CON Funding 219 days Tue 9/19/23 Tue 7/30/24
93 OCTA CTFP 2024 Funding 210 days Tue 9/19/23 Wed 7/17/24 97 SB-1 LPP 2024 Funding 190 days Mon 10/30/23 Tue 7/30/24 101 City Council Approval - PS&E 0 days Fri 12/13/24 Fri 12/13/24 102 5.0 Bid and Award (Bid Support) 4 mons Tue 12/24/24 Tue 4/15/25 103 6.0 Begin Construction Phase 0 days Tue 4/15/25 Tue 4/15/25 5/2
9/22
12/20
2/16
12/13
4/15
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 2023
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Path Driving Predecessor Milestone Task
Path Driving Predecessor Summary Task
Path Driving Predecessor Normal Task
Critical
Critical Split
Progress
Manual Progress
City/Agency Activity
Critical City/Agency Activity
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening
Draft Schedule
As with Savi Ranch Parkway, we can use
the same funding cycles to align the two
projects. Due to the regulatory permitting
process, Yorba Linda Boulevard is lagging
about 5 months behind Savi Ranch Parkway.
This gives the City options to build the
projects separately or together and phase
the construction to your benefit with a
single contractor.
Prompt delivery of the 65% plans is a crucial step on the project as this kicks off the regulatory permitting which is critical path to putting the project out to bid. We will conduct a Geometric Refinement (Task 3.9) to lock
down the project geometry and advance straight to the
65% PS&E task to accelerate the schedule.
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening Schedule (cont.)