Introduction 10 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Goals, Objectives, Policies,
and Performance Measures
This collaborative effort between the City of
Yorba Linda, the City of Placentia, and the
Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District
is needed to connect and create infrastructure
for safe, comfortable mobility for all community
members, including improvements to the multiuse trail network for exercise and recreation.
The Plan provides clear and actionable
strategies to promote people walking, biking,
and rolling as a part of healthy lifestyles;
reduce collisions involving those vulnerable
road users; and decrease transportationrelated pollution. The Plan recommends infrastructure projects and non-infrastructure
programs that reflect national best practices,
rigorous data analysis, and extensive
stakeholder engagement.
Safety
Comfort
Connectivity
Equity
Health
Progress
This Plan addresses the following goals:
Active Transportation Plan Introduction 11
This is a living document, and while these measurements will not capture the full picture, they will help the Cities understand to what extent they are meeting their goal of progress.
1 6
2 7
3 8
4 9
5 10
11 12
13 To meet these broad goals, this Plan helps these Cities achieve the following objectives:
Provide safe sidewalks and
intersections for people walking
and rolling
Strengthen social equity by
prioritizing infrastructure in
disadvantaged communities
Provide safe bikeways and
intersections for people biking
and rolling
Identify infrastructure and
programmatic barriers to walking
and biking
Provide a broad spectrum of
projects to benefit the many
types of active transportation
users
Connect trails and pathways
within and between Yorba Linda
and Placentia
Ensure that disadvantaged
communities fully share in
program benefits
Promote active travel as a way to
improve health
Reduce greenhouse gas and
particulate emissions from
vehicle travel by increasing use
of sidewalks, bikeways, and trails
Identify evaluation metrics
Integrate plans for active
transportation, safe routes to
schools, and trails
Prioritize infrastructure and
programs using community
needs and best practices
Provide Safe Routes to School
for K-12 students and their
caregivers
Introduction 12 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Plan/Study Agency/Organization Year
Completed
Connect SoCal–The 2024 Regional Transportation Plan/
Sustainable Communities Strategy
SCAG 2024
Yorba Linda ADA Accessibility Plan City of Yorba Linda 2023 Caltrans Active Transportation Plan for District 12 Caltrans 2022 Orange County Bikeways Map OCTA 2022
Yorba Linda General Plan: Housing Element Update City of Yorba Linda Adopted 2022; Amended 2023
Yorba Linda Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) City of Yorba Linda 2022 Orange County Safe Routes to School Action Plan OCTA, Orange County Health Care Agency
(OCHCA)
2021
Placentia General Plan: Land Use; Mobility Element; Health, Wellness, and Environmental Justice; Open Space and Recreation City of Placentia 2019
Toward an Active California - State Bicycle + Pedestrian Plan Caltrans 2017 Yorba Linda General Plan: Circulation Element City of Yorba Linda 2016 Yorba Linda Parks and Recreation Master Plan City of Yorba Linda 2014 Yorba Linda General Plan: Riding, Hiking, and Bikeway Trails Component
City of Yorba Linda 2005
OC Active Website OCTA Ongoing
Table 1. Previous Plan and Policy Review Documents
Previous Plan and Policy Review
A comprehensive review of previous
local, regional, and state plans and policy
documents pertinent to Complete Streets,
mobility, and sustainability was completed to
ensure consistency between these previous
plans and this Plan. This review helps to
identify completed local and regional plans
and studies to leverage related goals, policies,
and project recommendations, and to identify
and fill in gaps as needed. A summary of
each City’s General Plan Circulation/Mobility
Element is provided on the following pages.
These are key documents that were used in
the development of this Plan to understand the
existing transportation network in each city,
and each city’s vision for the future.
Table 1 lists all the documents studied in this
review. A summary of each reviewed document
can be found in Appendix A: Previous Plan
and Policy Review.
Active Transportation Plan Introduction 13
Yorba Linda General Plan
(2016)
Circulation Element
The Circulation Element of the Yorba Linda
General Plan provides a framework that
promotes the safe, efficient, and reliable
movement of people and goods throughout the
community. The chapter defines the goals and
policies that will enhance the development and
maintenance of the transportation system and
maximize the freedom of vehicular movement
and pedestrian movement in the community.
Open Space and Recreation Element
The Open Space and Recreation Element
provides policies and programs to enhance
the overall quality of life in Yorba Linda and
direct the management and protection of open
space land in the City. The Open Space and
Recreation Element provides guidance for the
acquisition, maintenance, and development
of parks, trails, and recreational facilities and
programs throughout the City.
Placentia General Plan
(2019)
Mobility Element
The Mobility Element represents Placentia’s
overall transportation plan. The transportation
plan includes both the physical transportation
system itself such as streets, highways,
rail lines, bicycle routes, and sidewalks, as
well as the various modes of transportation
such as cars, buses, trucks, trains, bicycles,
ridesharing, on-demand service, and
pedestrians using these facilities. In addition to
the traditional vehicular transportation planning
needs of the General Plan, the Mobility Element
also addresses interconnected transit and
active transportation modes (pedestrians,
bikeshare programs, and bicycles) that support
the City’s commitment toward advancing
transportation innovation as well as long-term
sustainability as outlined in SB 375.
Existing 02 Conditions
Existing Conditions 16 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Introduction
This chapter aims to identify and evaluate
existing infrastructure conditions in Yorba Linda
and Placentia, including bicycle, pedestrian,
public transportation, and road networks.
This chapter also identifies and describes key
destinations that can complement
and benefit from an expanded active
transportation network.
A comprehensive understanding of existing
conditions is necessary to develop a Plan
that will ultimately improve multimodal
transportation options. The findings of this
assessment directly informed subsequent
recommendations in this Plan.
Roadway Network
Some roads in the cities, such as Imperial
Highway (State Route 90) and Yorba Linda
Boulevard, are considered truck routes,
consisting of roadways that larger semi-trucks
are required to use. These arterial roads with
high traffic volumes and speed should have
their own corridor studies. Where feasible,
separated facilities, such as Class I shareduse path or Class IV separated bikeways were recommended on these routes or alternative
routes were identified. The following lists show
truck routes that run through both cities:
Yorba Linda
º State Route 91
º Imperial Highway (State Route 90)
Placentia
º Crowther Avenue
º Melrose Street
º Orangethorpe Avenue
º Placentia Avenue
º Rose Drive
º State Route 57 (Orange Freeway)
º Imperial Highway (State Route 90))
º Yorba Linda Boulevard
The Plan’s recommendations primarily focus
on the City-maintained roadway network, as
these are the roads over which the Cities have
exclusive jurisdiction and the ability to improve.
This network interconnects with state highways
and private roads, which the Cities do not
control but which are essential for most travel.
The links between these roadway systems
are crucial for enabling local, regional, and
interstate travel. These roads offer access
to local and regional destinations, including
employment areas, shopping centers,
schools, recreational areas, and residential
communities. The interconnected nature of the
roadway system necessitates collaboration
with other agencies to develop a comfortable
active transportation network for all residents,
workers, and visitors.
Active Transportation Plan Existing Conditions 17
Public Transportation
Metrolink and Amtrak
Yorba Linda and Placentia are also served by
the Metrolink commuter rail service. Nearby
stations include the Anaheim Canyon Station
and the Fullerton Station. Additionally, a
Metrolink station is currently under construction
at Melrose Avenue and Crowther Avenue in the
City of Placentia.
The Anaheim Canyon Station is served by the
91/Perris Valley Line and the Inland EmpireOrange County Line. The Fullerton Station is served by the 91/Perris Valley Line and the
Orange County Line. Amtrak Pacific Surfliner
service is also provided at the Fullerton Station.
Together, these lines connect riders to stations
across Southern California. Additionally, up
to three bikes can be brought onto regular
Metrolink train cars, and all trains include a
bike car that accommodates up to nine more.
Orange County
Transportation Authority
The Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA) provides public transportation services
to Yorba Linda and Placentia. Yorba Linda is
served solely by OCTA’s 26 Local Bus Route,
which takes riders from the center of Yorba
Linda to the Fullerton Park-and-Ride. Placentia
is served by four Local Bus Routes, including
the 26, 30, 38, and 71, and two Community
Bus Routes, the 123 and the 129. These
routes similarly connect riders to the greater
Orange County area, including nearby public
transportation hubs such as the Goldenwest
Transportation Center, and the Anaheim
Canyon and Buena Park Metrolink Stations.
Existing Conditions 18 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 1. Yorba Linda and Placentia Existing Transit Facilities
Active Transportation Plan Existing Conditions 19 Page 543 of 1177 Existing Conditions 20 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Existing Infrastructure and Facilities
A bicyclist cycling along the El Cajon Trail, a Class
I Shared-Use Path in Yorba Linda
A Class II Bike Lane near Mabel M. Paine
Elementary School
CLASS II BIKE LANE
Class II bike lanes are dedicated bicycle
space on a facility shared with vehicles.
Most commonly, these are marked bicycle
lanes or paved shoulders and are wide enough
that vehicles can pass cyclists without leaving
their lanes.
CLASS I SHARED-USE PATH
Class I bikeways are facilities that are
fully separated from automobile traffic.
These are generally off-street trails and are
often shared with pedestrians and sometimes
equestrian users.
Existing and previously planned bicycle and
pedestrian facilities provide a base for future
recommendations in this Plan.
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Existing cycle facilities contribute to the ability
of residents of Yorba Linda and Placentia to
bike to their destination.
Bikeways in Yorba Linda and Placentia can be
categorized into four classes:
Active Transportation Plan 21 Existing Conditions
A Class III Bike Route along Bastanchury Road in
Yorba Linda.
A Class IV Separated Bikeway along Esperanza
Road in Yorba Linda.
CLASS III BIKE ROUTE
Class III bike routes are roadways where
bicycles and vehicles share the same lane.
These are generally indicated with signage
to “share the road” or by painted sharrows.
Bicycles are granted full right of access
to the street and are considered part of
general traffic.
CLASS IV SEPARATED BIKEWAYS
An on-street bikeway that is separated
from traffic by a vertical barrier, such as a
curb, median, or bollards. Also called a “cycle
track” or “protected bikeway.” May be one- or
two-way.
Existing Conditions 22 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Many of the existing Class II bike lanes are
along main arterials such as Bastanchury
Road, Fairmont Boulevard, and Village Center
Drive. However, due to these arterials’ size,
the existing Class II bike lanes may not feel
comfortable for most potential cyclists. Many
of the existing lanes in Placentia are short
segments of streets with no connectivity.
Although the bikeways adhere to the current
Caltrans design standards for widths and lane
configurations, improvements can be made
to enhance traffic safety and encourage more
people to bike in Yorba Linda and Placentia.
The Santa Ana River Trail runs along the
southern border of Yorba Linda and is the only
Class I in either city. The trail will eventually
be a 110-mile multi-use path spanning from
San Bernardino to Huntington Beach. The trail
currently consists of two sections and spans
about 60 miles. In Yorba Linda, riders can use
the trail approximately 6 miles east to Corona,
and 27 miles west to Huntington Beach. Users
can access dining, shopping, and recreation
areas along the trail, and connect to the
Huntington Beach Bicycle Trail.
A 0.85 mile section of Class IV separated
bikeway, with approximately 600’ in Yorba
Linda, was recently constructed along the
southern border of Yorba Linda via Esperanza
Road and Fairmont Connector. This bikeway
was constructed as part of the OC Loop,
a vision for 66 miles of seamless path
connections throughout Orange County.
The El Cajon Trail is a Class I shared-use
path from the northwest corner of Yorba Linda
to the southeast and is a part of the OC Loop.
There is a gap approximately 0.75 miles
along on-street connections, in the El Cajon
Trail between Grand View Avenue and Arroyo
Cajon Drive.
In addition to the bikeway classes listed above,
Yorba Linda has paved multipurpose trails that
can also be used by bicyclists. However, due
to width constraints, these paved multipurpose
trails do not meet the Caltrans standards for a
Class I shared-use path. To learn more about
paved multipurpose trails, see the Volume II
document, the Updated Yorba Linda Riding,
Hiking, and Bikeway Trails Element.
There are over 56 miles of existing bikeway
facilities within Yorba Linda and Placentia
(Figure 2. Yorba Linda and Placentia
Existing Bicycle Facilities). This includes
14.3miles of Class I shared-use paths, 29.6
miles of Class II bike lanes, 12.2 miles of
Class III bike routes, and .17 miles of Class IV
separated bikeways Table 2).
Table 2. Existing Bikeway Facilities within Yorba
Linda and Placentia
Facility Types Mileage
Class I Shared-Use Path 14.3
Class II Bike Lanes 29.6
Class III Bike Routes 12.2
Class IV Separated Bikeways .17
Existing Bikeway Network 56.3
Active Transportation Plan 23 Existing Conditions
Figure 2. Yorba Linda and Placentia Existing Bicycle Facilities Ä142
Ä241
Ä57
Ä55
Ä90
CROWTHER AVE
VALLEY VIEW AVE ORANGETHORPE AVE
SUNKIST ST
BASTANCHURY RD
JEFFERSON ST
TAFT AVE
ESPERANZA RD
MEATS AVE
CANYON RIMRD
BUENA VISTA AVE
YORBA LINDA BLVD
SANTA ANA CANYON RD
BRADFORD AVE
PLACENTIA AVE LAMBERT RD SHAFFER ST
RICHFIELD RD
S A NTIAGO BLVD
GOLDEN AVE
GLASSELL ST
KELLOGG DR
V ALLEY DR
VAN BUREN ST
WEIR CANYON RD
CHAPMAN AVE
VALENCIA AVE
RIO VISTA ST
NOHL RANCHRD
KRAEMER BLVD
LINCOLN AVE
FAIRMONT BLVD
S T AT E COLLEGE B L DV
TUST NI AVE
HEIM AVE
SERRANO AVE
LAKEVIEW AVE
BREA BLVD
CARBO N
CANYONRD
TONNER CANYON RD
ASSOCIATED
RD
LA PALMA AVE
SANTA FE A VE
V IST A D EL M AR
SOQUELC ANY ON RD
YORBARANCHRD SAN ANTONIO RD
BALLRD
T ELEGR APH CANYON RD
ROSE DR
MESA DR
PERALT A HILL S DR
MOHLERD R
RIVERDALE AVE
VILLAGE CENTER DR
CANNONST
VIA AR BOLES
GERDADR
HIDDEN HI L LS RD
MIRALOMA AVE
MELROSE ST
PROSPECT AVE
SOUTH ST
EUREKA AVE
BATAVIA ST FRONT E RAST
SATU R N ST
MILLER ST
BIRCH ST
PALM DR
CORONADO ST
LA JOLLA ST
TUSTIN ST
Chino Hills
State Park
Santa Ana River
YORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA
EXISTING BICYCLE
FACILITIES
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
City Boundaries
Water
Parks
EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE
I - Shared Use Path
II - Bike Lane
III - Bike Route
IV - Separated Bikeway
0 0.7 1.4 MILES
Existing Conditions 24 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Bicycle Parking
Knowing a secure place is available to store
a bike at a destination is an important part of
making a bicycle trip feasible and can help
encourage more bicycling in Yorba Linda and
Placentia. Bicycle parking is currently sparse
in both cities and mainly consists of wave racks
and inverted U racks. These can be found
at most schools and parks, in Yorba Linda’s
Historic Main Street and Old Town Placentia,
at Placentia Civic Center, near major shopping
centers, and around newer high-density
residential developments.
Decorative bike racks on E Crowther Avenue in
Placentia
Installation of new bicycle racks should
follow Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle
Professionals guidance. Short-term bike
racks should provide two points of contact
between the bike frame and the rack. U-racks
are an affordable and effective option for
this purpose. Bike racks that only secure the
wheel, such as wave racks or wheel racks,
should be avoided. For high-traffic areas or
popular destinations, longer-term bike parking
solutions, such as lockers, may be considered.
Long-term bike parking is designed for
extended use, providing secure storage for
bikes over several days or weeks. These
facilities are typically enclosed to prevent theft
and damage, and can include lockers, bike
rooms, or bike cages. Long-term bike parking
is particularly valuable near job centers and
locations with high activity. Yorba Linda and
Placentia should prioritize implementing longterm parking solutions where feasible.
Existing Pedestrian
Facilities
Quality pedestrian facilities can contribute
to the ability of residents to walk to their
destinations. In many areas of Yorba Linda and
Placentia, pedestrian facilities offer access to
key destinations such as schools, parks, transit
stops/stations, and commercial areas. Existing
pedestrian facilities include sidewalks, shareduse paths, pedestrian bridges, crosswalks, and rectangular rapid flashing beacons.
Photos of these pedestrian facilities are shown
on page 27.
Most streets in both Yorba Linda and
Placentia have sidewalks. In 2023, Yorba
Linda completed an Access Compliance
Survey Report, which surveyed sidewalks and
curb ramps in the city for compliance with
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The report found 81.5 miles of the city’s 254
sidewalk miles to be ADA-compliant. Yorba
Linda will use this report as a guide to updating
its sidewalk network. As shown in Figure 3.
Yorba Linda Existing Sidewalks, more than
half of the streets lack sidewalk or trail facilities
due to certain areas of Yorba Linda being
designated as rural.
Figure 4. Placentia Existing Sidewalks
shows the existing sidewalks on Placentia’s
arterial and collector roadways. Most streets
in the city have sidewalks, including the local
roadways not illustrated in the map. In 2024,
the City of Placentia initiated the development
of an ADA Transition Plan and a self-evaluation
to ensure its existing sidewalks are accessible
for all community members, and the plan is
anticipated to be completed by late 2025.
Active Transportation Plan 25 Existing Conditions
Figure 3. Yorba Linda Existing Sidewalks
CHINO HILLS
VILLA PARK
PLACENTIA
YORBA LINDA
Ä142
Ä241
Ä55
Santa Ana River
Chino Hills
State Park
YORBA LINDA
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Parks
Water
City Boundaries
0 0.6 1.2 MILES
EXISTING LOCATIONS
Yorba Linda Sidewalks
Existing Conditions 26 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 4. Placentia Existing Sidewalks
FULLERTON
PLACENTIA
PLACENTIA Ä90
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Parks
Water
City Boundaries
0 0.25 0.5 MILES
EXISTING LOCATIONS
Placentia Sidewalks
Active Transportation Plan 27 Existing Conditions
Sidewalk: A paved path alongside a street that
provides space for those walking separated from
vehicular traffic.
Shared-Use Path: A multi-purpose trail designed
for both those walking and those biking, separated
from vehicular traffic.
Pedestrian Bridge: A structure designed for
people walking to cross over obstacles like
railways, roads, and highways.
Crosswalk: A designated area on a street marked
by lines to clearly delineate the right-of-way for
those crossing the street.
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon: A traffic
safety device that uses flashing lights to alert
drivers to the presence of crossing pedestrians.
Existing Conditions 28 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Existing Equestrian Facilities
The City of Yorba Linda contains over 100
miles of trails for use by equestrians in addition
to pedestrians and bicyclists. This trail network
provides off-street, non-vehicular connections
to open spaces and recreational areas
throughout the city. Furthermore, several of
the trails connect to a larger regional system
that links key recreation destinations including
Carbon Canyon Regional Park, Chino Hills
State Park, Yorba Linda Regional Park, and the
Santa Ana River Trail. Learn more about these
trails in Volume II: Yorba Linda Riding, Hiking,
and Bikeway Trails Element.
Yorba Linda also has several equestrian
facilities, including three staging areas and an
equestrian center. The staging areas provide
space for trailer parking and have connections
to Chino Hills State Park. The five-acre Phillip
S. Paxton Equestrian Center has an equestrian
show arena, a turnout arena, and a round pen. An equestrian crossing connecting two trails Pedestrian
Priority Zones
This Plan identifies three pedestrian priority
zones: two in Placentia and one in Yorba
Linda. Together, these three pedestrian priority
zones act as model areas for pedestrian
improvements throughout both cities.
The two pedestrian priority zones in Placentia
were selected because they represent
the areas within the city identified as
disadvantaged by CalEnviroScreen 4.0, a
tool developed by the California Office of
Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
that identifies communities disproportionately
burdened by pollution or health and
vulnerability factors. The third pedestrian
priority zone, located in Yorba Linda, was
selected by the City of Yorba Linda and
includes historic Main Street. The three zones
all feature important destinations including
housing, schools, parks, retail areas, and
public facilities that community members would
like to access by walking or biking. All three
are also located near or along major roadways
including Imperial Highway (State Route 90),
Orangethorpe Avenue, Yorba Linda Boulevard,
and State Route 57 (Orange Freeway).
Active Transportation Plan 29 Existing Conditions
The Chapman and Kraemer Pedestrian
Priority Zone in Placentia includes Old Town
Placentia, the City’s historic and compact
downtown area that will soon be home to the
Placentia Metrolink Station. Placentia’s second
pedestrian priority zone, the McFadden Park
Pedestrian Priority Zone, is centered around
important public facilities including McFadden
Park, La Placita Parkette, Jaycee Parkette,
Melrose Elementary School, and Valadez
Middle School Academy. The Yorba Linda
Downtown Pedestrian Priority Zone includes
the City of Yorba Linda’s historic downtown
area, home to the Yorba Linda Public Library
and newly constructed retail centers such as
the Yorba Linda Town Center.
Pedestrian Priority Zone Figure 5-Figure 7
display the boundaries of each pedestrian
priority zone. The pedestrian recommendations
included in these zones were prioritized for
implementation by both Cities.
Existing Conditions 30 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 5. Pedestrian Priority Zone: Chapman and Kraemer, Placentia Ä57
Kraemer
Memorial
Park
Santa Fe
Park
Kraemer
Middle
Valencia High
KRAEMER BLVD
CROWTHER AVE
BRADFORD AVE
PLACENTIA AVE
ORANGETHORPE AVE
CONCORD WY
CHAPMAN AVE
ENCINITAS WAY
LAVENDER LN
VALLEY FORGE DR
ALTA ST
TURF DR
PRIMROSE AVE
MARSEILLE DR
SANTA FE AVE
MOLOKAI DR
HAWAII WY
OAHU WAY
SARA JANE LN
RUBY DR
CENTER ST
MONROE WY
MAUI LN
TWILIGHT ST
CAMARILLO ST
GEORGIA CIR
BOYSENBERRY LN
MELODY LN
WALNUT AVE
MELROSE ST
MAIN ST
MURRAY ST
WILSON AVE
FRONTAGE RD
MASSACHUSETTS LN
NEW JERSEY LN
SANTE FE CT
INDUSTRIAL WAY
STARDUST ST
HUNDLEYST
RADCLIFFE AVE
FRANKLIN DR
LANAI LN
SUNRISE ST
ANGELINA DR
ANNED DR
DIAMOND RD
LANCASTER AVE
RUTHERFORD RD
KIMBERLY AVE
NUTWOOD AVE
HARMONY LN
ALLEY
DEREK DR
EVE CIR
CONNECTICUT WAY
CARDINAL ST
PARTRIDGE ST
KAUAI LN
VENTURA AVE
SANDPIPER AVE
SUNSET DR
OLIVE ST
MOONBEAM ST
MOUNT VERNON WAY
ORANGE GROVE AVE
ALTA VISTA ST
PORTER WY
BACKS LN
RED GUM ST
BAKER ST
CAPISTRANO ST
ORCHID DR
KENSINGTON AVE
SANTA BARBARA ST
RAMONA ST
KENT ST
MEADOWLARK LN
PHEASANT ST
TEMPLE ST
YORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Parks
School Property
Old Town Placentia Streetscape
Master Plan Area
PEDESTRIAN ZONES
Pedestrian Priority Zone
0 0.07 0.15 MILES
PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE:
CHAPMAN AND KRAEMER
PLACENTIA
Active Transportation Plan 31 Existing Conditions
Figure 6. Pedestrian Priority Zone: McFadden Park, Placentia Ä91
Ä57
La
Placita
Parkette
McFadden Park
Jaycee
Parkette Melrose
Elementary
Valadez Middle
School Academy
PLACENTIA AVE
MELROSE
ST
CROWTHER AVE
MOISI LN
ORANGETHORPE AVE
EASTWIND DR
LAWRENCE AVE
PARADISE ST
NEBRASKA AVE
ALLEY
COZY TE
BLUE GUM ST
ORTEGA WAY
MONROE WY
BOYSENBERRY LN PORTER WY
MIRALOMA WAY
BRIARVALE AVE
DUNN WAY
LAPALMA AVE
LA CRESTA AVE
EAST PARK LN FASHION LN
SEGOVIA CIR
EASTON ST
INDUSTRIAL WAY
REGAL PARK DR
SUNSHINE WY
WHITTIER ST
OHIO AVE
TERRACE ST
DALYST
BUCCANEER DR
KANSAS AVE
CYPRESS ST
PRIVATE ST
WALLGREEN ST
BALSAM AVE
KIMBERLY AVE
MISSOURI AVE
MIRALOMA AVE
ROMNEYA DR
LA JOLLA ST
IOWA PL
CORONADO ST
SUNKIST ST
VAN HORN WY
HUNDLEY WAY
TAFOLLA ST
VIA MARTENS
ARNOLD DR
LAWRENCE ST
AVE DE PIO PICO
VISTA AVE
GONZALES ST
GRETTA LN
VIA BURTON
RED GUM ST
TEMPLE ST
BOUNDARIES
Parks
School Property
PEDESTRIAN ZONES
Pedestrian Priority Zone
0 0.07 0.15 MILES
YORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE:
MCFADDEN PARK
PLACENTIA
Existing Conditions 32 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 7. Pedestrian Priority Zone: Yorba Linda Downtown, Yorba Linda PIPER
ADAMS
CEDAR
MONTEREY
EISENHOWER
SUNNY
KAYE
WEST HILL
DANZA PLAZA
SUNSET LN
LAUREL VIEW
WEST TERRACE
SOUTHERN POINTE
SHADY KNL
AVOLINDA
ALICIA
TRUMAN
SUMMIT
LOGAN LINDA
MAIN
NORCRIS
DANITA
DRY CREEK
NEWBURY
FLORA
PRIVATE
RUTH
SOUTHERN HILLS
BURKE
MAGEE
VALENCIA
OAK LEAF
YORBA LN
SHOOK
GARDEN
LOS ALTOS LN
TEDFORD WY
VIA BUENA VIDA
LINDFORD
JOSHUA
FREDRICK
ZELLA
IMPERIAL
VIA SERENO
MCKINLEY CONDIE
WISTERIA
MONSON
ROOSEVELT
KENNEDY
SYCAMORE CIR
SEQUOIA
SHARON
PARK
NIANTIC
HIGHLAND
TOWN CENTER
JAMAICA TER
MELODY
HUMMINGBIRD
LA CASITA CARI
SIESTA
BEN LOMOND OAK TREE
ARROYO
EVERGREEN
BOEING
SYCAMORE
CITRIODORA
HACIENDA
RIO DE ORO
RIO DE PLATA
ACORN
LOGAN VIEW
TIKI TORCH
LEMON
AVOCADO
DORTHEA
NOGAL
DOUGLAS
SHOOK LN
SHAW LN
SCHOOL
CAMELA
MOUNTAIN VIEW
HAVEN
MARK
OLINDA
LOS ALTOS
DEBI
MANDARIN
ROCKY POINT
DEVILLE
PLUMOSA
YORBA LINDA
LAKEVIEW
ORIENTE
BLAIR
ALTRUDY
EUREKA
YORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Existing Trails
Parks
School Property
PEDESTRIAN ZONES
Pedestrian Priority Zone
0 0.06 0.12 MILES
PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE:
YORBA LINDA DOWNTOWN
YORBA LINDA
Active Transportation Plan 33 Existing Conditions
Key Destinations
Chino Hills State Park
Chino Hills State Park is in the foothills of
the Santa Ana Mountains along the northern
border of Yorba Linda. This park is a popular
regional destination for hiking, horseback
riding, and mountain biking. Over 60 miles of
trails allow access into the Chino-Puente Hills
Wildlife Corridor, offering opportunities to view
native plants and wildlife.
Santa Ana River Trail
The Santa Ana River Trail is a regional
recreation trail that, when complete, will span
110 miles from the Pacific Ocean to the San
Bernardino Mountains. Much of the trail south
of the City of Corona through Orange County
has been completed. Riders can continuously
ride from just west of Corona to Huntington
Beach on the Santa Ana River Trail. Sections
east of Yorba Linda, such as Corona, Eastvale,
and Norco are still under construction.
Transit Stations
As described on page 17, there are Metrolink
rail lines and stations located near Yorba Linda
and Placentia, including a planned station
at Melrose Avenue and Crowther Avenue.
Providing active transportation connections
to these stations can encourage residents to
walk and bike to these stations, creating a more
equitable transportation network. While transit
can help community members account for the
bulk of their trip, without safe walking and biking
facilities, community members may choose to
drive to their destinations instead, increasing the
number of vehicles on the road.
California State University
(CSU) Fullerton
Although CSU Fullerton is located just outside
the project area to the west, in the City of
Fullerton, many residents of Yorba Linda and
Placentia are among the 41,000 students
enrolled there. With the largest student body in
the CSU system, the campus faces significant
parking limitations and high costs. The active
transportation recommendations proposed in
Placentia aim to offer local residents alternative
options for commuting to and from the CSU
Fullerton campus.
Key destinations are those that community
members visit every day such as schools,
parks, libraries, and transit stations. Key
destinations can act as pedestrian generators,
or places that indicate the start or end
of a pedestrian trip. Providing safe and
connected active transportation infrastructure
to these destinations can reduce vehicle
miles traveled and can help the region in
achieving greenhouse gas reduction targets.
Recommendations in this Plan were made with
these key destinations in mind.
Existing Conditions 34 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 8. Yorba Linda and Placentia Key Destinations
Active Transportation Plan 35 Existing Conditions
Public Schools This Plan evaluates 28 schools, covering all public schools in Yorba Linda and Placentia. All schools
are part of the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School
District. The remaining schools in the Placentia-Yorba
Linda Unified School District are not evaluated as
part of this Plan, as any improvements to the streets
surrounding these campuses fall under the jurisdiction
of the City of Anaheim or the City of Fullerton. These
schools include Glenview Elementary, Rio Vista
Elementary, Topaz Elementary, Woodsboro Elementary,
and Esperanza High School. Recommendations for
these schools are therefore not included in this Plan.
Table 3 shows the schools, their grade level, and the
city in which they are located. Figure 9. Yorba Linda
and Placentia Existing School Locations shows the
location of each school.
School Name Grade Level City
Bernardo Yorba Middle School 7–8 Yorba Linda
Brookhaven Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Bryant Ranch School TK–5 Yorba Linda
El Camino Real High School 9–12 (Continuation) Placentia El Dorado High School 9–12 Placentia
Fairmont Elementary School TK–6 Yorba Linda
George Key School Special Education Placentia
Glenknoll Elementary School TK–6 Unincorporated Yorba Linda Orange County Golden Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Kraemer Middle School 7–8 Placentia
Lakeview Elementary School TK–5 Yorba Linda
Linda Vista Elementary School TK–5 Yorba Linda
Mabel M. Paine Elementary School TK–5 Yorba Linda
Melrose Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Morse Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Table 3. Placentia-Yorba Linda Schools
Table continued on the following page
Existing Conditions 36 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Parkview School TK–12 (Home School) Placentia
Rose Drive Elementary School TK–5 Yorba Linda
Ruby Drive Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Sierra Vista Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Travis Ranch School TK–8 Yorba Linda
Tuffree Middle School 7–8 Placentia
Tynes Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Valadez Middle School Academy 6–8 Placentia
Valencia High School 9–12 Placentia
Van Buren Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Wagner Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Yorba Linda High School 9–12 Yorba Linda
Yorba Linda Middle School 6–8 Yorba Linda
Active Transportation Plan 37 Existing Conditions
Figure 9. Yorba Linda and Placentia Existing School Locations
Needs Analysis 03
Needs Analysis 40 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Introduction
This needs analysis outlines the findings
of the commute trend, equity analysis,
collision analysis, and land use suitability
analysis. These analyses helped the project
team understand where there are gaps in
the bikeway and pedestrian network and
where new or improved active transportation
facilities are needed. Disconnected active
transportation networks can result in longer
travel times and uncomfortable transportation
options for community members and can
create barriers in the transportation network.
The commute trend analysis provides insight
into residents’ preferred means of commuting
to work in Yorba Linda and Placentia compared
to statewide preferences. The equity analysis
identifies communities that face inequitable
social and health factors. Identifying these
communities helps Yorba Linda and Placentia
understand where active transportation
improvements should be prioritized. The
collision analysis explores historic pedestrian
and bicycle collisions, providing an
understanding of where improvements are
most urgently needed in the cities. Finally, the
land suitability analysis uses environmental
data and land use characteristics to pinpoint
parts of each city where constructing and
improving the active transportation network is
most feasible.
Commute Trend
approximately 120,000 residents, comprising
about 4% of the Orange County’s total
population. Major county employment centers,
such as Disney, the University of California,
and larger Kaiser Permanente hospitals
are located outside of both cities, likely
encouraging workers to travel by car.
Residents’ choice in travel mode to work can
reflect existing infrastructure and connectivity,
as well as cultural attitudes toward automobile
use in Placentia and Yorba Linda.
According to the 2022 American Community
Survey, most residents of Yorba Linda and
Placentia commute to work by driving alone
(74%). In Yorba Linda, an additional 0.5% use
public transit, 0.5% reported walking, and
0.3% reported biking to work. In Placentia,
approximately 2% use public transit, 2% walk
to work, and 0.6% bike to work. Both cities
have approximately 2% of residents who do not
have access to a vehicle.
When looking at California as a whole,
most people still commute to work by driving
alone (68%). An additional 4% use public
transportation, 2% reported walking, and 0.7%
reported biking to work. Approximately 3% of
all California residents do not have access to
a vehicle.
Both Yorba Linda and Placentia are suburban
cities in northeastern Orange County. The
two cities exhibit a wide variation in land use
diversity and population density, with lower
densities prevailing in many areas. Together,
Yorba Linda and Placentia are home to
Active Transportation Plan 41 Needs Analysis
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
68%
2% 0.7%
10%
4%
California
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
68%
2% 0.7%
10%
4%
California
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
68%
2% 0.7%
10%
4%
California
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
68%
2% 0.7%
10%
4%
California
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
68%
2% 0.7%
10%
4%
California
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
74%
0.3%
0.5%
5%
0.5%
Yorba Linda
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
74%
2% 0.6%
8%
2%
Placentia
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
68%
2% 0.7%
10%
4%
California
Commute
Trends
Yorba Linda commute trends data is provided
by U.S. Census Bureau. American Community
Survey Table S0801, 2022.
Placentia commute trends data is provided by
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community
Survey Table S0801, 2022.
California commute trends data is provided by
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community
Survey Table S0801, 2022.
The percentages in the pie charts do not total 100% due to unaccounted-for categories, such as telecommuting and other miscellaneous modes of travel (e.g., taxi).
Needs Analysis 42 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Equity Analysis
These “SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities”
are shown in red in Figure 10. Yorba Linda
and Placentia SB 535 Disadvantaged
Communities. In Yorba Linda, very little of the
city is considered disadvantaged. The few high
scores in southwest Placentia and south Yorba
Linda are likely due to the industrial land use
near the Santa Ana River and exposure from
State Route 57 (Orange Freeway) and State
Route 91.
The equity analysis is a review of state and
regional equity tools to identify disadvantaged
communities in Yorba Linda and Placentia.
The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 tool created by
the California Office of Environmental Health
Hazard Assessment identifies communities that
are disproportionately burdened by pollution
(see Figure 10. Yorba Linda and Placentia
SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities).
CalEnviroScreen uses pollution indicators—like
levels of ozone concentration and drinking
water contaminants—and social and health
indicators—like poverty levels, rates of
disease, and housing burdens on residents—
to provide a cumulative impact score for each
census tract in the state. In 2012, Senate Bill
(SB) 535 (De León, Chapter 830, Statutes
of 2012) established initial requirements for
minimum funding levels for various state grant
programs to “Disadvantaged Communities”
(DACs).
Active Transportation Plan 43 Needs Analysis
Figure 10. Yorba Linda and Placentia SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities
Needs Analysis 44 Yorba Linda-Placentia
The Healthy Places Index (Figure 11. Yorba
Linda and Placentia Healthy Places Index),
developed by the Public Health Alliance of
Southern California, determines how healthy a
census tract is using characteristics such as
level of education, healthcare access, housing
availability, transportation access, and social
environment. In general, the cities of Yorba
Linda and Placentia have healthier community
conditions than 75% of other California cities.
The census tract in the south and west of
Placentia that scores lowest on the Healthy
Places Index is mostly industrial; therefore,
residents in the area have more limited access
to community destinations like healthcare
centers and parks.
Active Transportation Plan 45 Needs Analysis
Figure 11. Yorba Linda and Placentia Healthy Places Index
Needs Analysis 46 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Collision Analysis
Bicycle and Pedestrian
Collision History
The Cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia
experienced 1,607 crashes from 2013 to 2022.
Of these, 133 crashes involved people biking,
and 135 crashes involved people walking.
Bicycle- and pedestrian-involved accidents
account for 16% of all collisions.
Collisions in Yorba Linda and Placentia cluster
along Yorba Linda Boulevard, which is an eastwest street that crosses both Yorba Linda and Placentia, as well as Rose Drive, a north-south
street, crossing both Yorba Linda and Placentia
as well. Notably, there are more and denser
collisions toward the west of the study area,
particularly in Placentia (see Figure 12. Yorba
Linda and Placentia Bicycle and Pedestrian
Crashes from 2013 to 2022, by Severity and
Figure 13. Yorba Linda and Placentia Active
Transportation Crashes Clustered from 2013
to 2022, by Severity).
Data on bicycle- and pedestrian-involved
collisions can provide insight into the overall
safety of the transportation network and help
identify locations or roadways that tend to have
higher collision rates. Collisions in Yorba Linda
and Placentia were analyzed citywide and at
specific locations. These insights informed
the development of project and programmatic
recommendations for Yorba Linda and
Placentia to address challenges people face
while walking and biking.
Active Transportation Plan 47 Needs Analysis
Figure 12. Yorba Linda and Placentia Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes from 2013 to 2022, by Severity ! !
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
CHINO HILLS
ORANGE
FULLERTON
ANAHEIM
BREA
VILLA PARK
PLACENTIA
YORBA LINDA
LOS ANGELES
Ä142
Ä241
Ä57
Ä55
Ä90
Ä90
FAIRMONT BL VD
V ISTA DEL M AR
ROSE DR
HIDDENH LI LS R D
PROSPECT AVE
ESPERANZA RD
Santa Ana River
Chino Hills
State Park
YORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA
BICYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN CRASHES
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
0 0.75 1.5 MILES
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
CRASHES
Bike Crashes
! Fatality
! Severe Injury
! Visible Injury or Complaint
Pedestrian Crashes
! Fatality
! Severe Injury
! Visible Injury or Complaint
BOUNDARIES
City Boundaries
Parks
Water
The collision data from 2013 to 2022 is provide by
Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS),
Safe Transportation Research and Education
Center, University of California, Berkeley. 2024.
Needs Analysis 48 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 13. Yorba Linda and Placentia Active Transportation Crashes Clustered from 2013 to 2022, by Severity Larger icons indicate a denser
cluster of collisions.
Fatality
Fatality
Active Transportation Plan 49 Needs Analysis
A significant portion of the active transportation
crashes occurred at the western boundary,
in the La Jolla and Old Town disadvantaged
communities of Placentia. Spatially, this
analysis reveals that bicycle collisions
occurred more often in Placentia and that
these incidents were often more severe in
nature (Figure 14. Yorba Linda and Placentia
Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes Profile, by
Severity). Key takeaways from these collisions
include:
º Of all bicycle and pedestrian crashes, 10%
are severe-injury crashes, while only 4% of
vehicle crashes are severe-injury crashes.
Among all crashes, only 5% are severeinjury crashes, which shows that bicycle and pedestrian severe-injury crashes
occur twice as often as all types
of crashes.
º Active transportation-related crashes,
especially for pedestrians, are more likely
to be fatal and severe than other crashes.
Figure 14. Yorba Linda and Placentia Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes Profile, by Severity
FATALITY
Bike
Crashes
Ped
Crashes
Bike/Ped
Crashes
Vehicle
Crashes
All
Crashes
SEVERE
INJURY
VISIBLE
INJURY
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
O%
9%1O%
81%
5%
1O%
85%
1%
4%
95%
2%
5%
93%
1O%
9O%
Needs Analysis 50 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 15. Yorba Linda and Placentia Bicycle Figure 15. Yorba Linda and Placentia Bicycle Crashes by Severity by Year Crashes by Severity by Year and Figure
16. Yorba Linda and Placentia Pedestrian
Crashes by Severity by Year display the trend
of bicycle crashes and pedestrian crashes
over the study years. Key takeaways from
these collisions include:
º Bicycle crashes have a decreasing trend
among all kinds of injuries, from 28 fatal or
injury crashes in 2013 to 5 injury crashes
in 2022, with no fatal or severe-injury
crashes reported.
º Pedestrian crashes show an increasing
trend of crashes from 2019 (3 crashes) to
2022 (17 crashes).
º There were fewer fatal or severe-injury
crashes in 2019 than other years for both
bicycle and pedestrian crashes.
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
SEVERE
INJURY
VISIBLE
INJURY
COMPLAINT
OF PAIN
0 5
10 15
20 25
30
Active Transportation Plan 51 Needs Analysis
FATALITY SEVERE
INJURY
VISIBLE
INJURY
COMPLAINT
OF PAIN
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 0
5 10
15 20
25 º In Yorba Linda and Placentia, 11% of Figure 16. Yorba Linda and Placentia Pedestrian Crashes by Severity by Year pedestrian fatal or severe-injury crashes
occurred when it was dark and streetlights
were available. Only 6% of pedestrian
fatal or severe-injury crashes occurred in
daylight conditions.
Needs Analysis 52 Yorba Linda-Placentia
º In Yorba Linda and Placentia, fatal or
severe-injury crashes for pedestrians most
often happened when pedestrians were
crossing outside a crosswalk (7%). Overall,
45% of all severity-types of pedestrian
collisions occurred while the pedestrian
was crossing the street at an intersection
with a crosswalk.
Figure 17. Yorba Linda and Placentia Bicycle Crashes by Light Conditions SEVERE
INJURY
VISIBLE
INJURY
Dark -
Street Lights
Dusk or
Dawn
Daylight
5%
17%
2% 3% 3%
70%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Active Transportation Plan 53 Needs Analysis
Figure 18. Yorba Linda and Placentia Pedestrian Crashes by Light Conditions
FATALITY SEVERE
INJURY
VISIBLE
INJURY
Dark - No
Street Lights
Dark - Street
Lights
Dusk or
Dawn
Daylight
1% 1%
5%
7%
24%
1%
3% 2%
4%
53%
0% 0% 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Needs Analysis 54 Yorba Linda-Placentia
º A total of 26% of all pedestrian crashes
occurred in disadvantaged communities
in Placentia (see Figure 20. Active
Transportation Collisions and Equity
and Figure 21. Yorba Linda and Placentia
Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes and
Disadvantaged Communities).
º Most bicycle crashes in a disadvantaged
communities occurred along Chapman
Avenue in Old Town and Orangethorpe
Avenue in the La Jolla neighborhood.
There is an existing Class II bike lane along
East Chapman Avenue between Central
Avenue and Orangethorpe Avenue, and
along Orangethorpe Avenue.
º Most pedestrian crashes occurred along
Chapman Avenue in Old Town and West La
Jolla Street in the La Jolla neighborhood.
The La Jolla neighborhood is bisected by
State Route 57 (Orange Freeway). West La
Jolla Street connects the neighborhood
with a two-lane bridge over the freeway,
with well-used sidewalks.
Figure 19. Yorba Linda and Placentia Pedestrian Crashes by Pedestrian Action 2%
7%
2%2%
10%
3%
20%
1%
3%
2%
40%
0% 0% 0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
FATALITY SEVERE
INJURY
VISIBLE
INJURY
Not in
Road
In
Road
Crossing
Not at Xwalk
Crossing
Xwalk not at
Intersection
Crossing
Xwalk at
Intersection
4% 4%
Active Transportation Plan 55 Needs Analysis
Figure 20. Active Transportation Collisions and Equity
BICYCLE
CRASHES
3% 3%
23%
56%
7%
63%
PEDESTRIAN
CRASHES
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
IN EQUITY
AREA
NOT IN
EQUITY AREA
% KSI % Non-KSI % KSI % Non-KSI
28%
18%
Needs Analysis 56 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 21. Yorba Linda and Placentia Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes and Disadvantaged Communities ! !
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
CHINO HILLS
ORANGE
FULLERTON
ANAHEIM
BREA
VILLA PARK
PLACENTIA
YORBA LINDA
LOS ANGELES
Ä142
Ä241
Ä57
Ä55
Ä90
Ä90
FAIRMONT BL VD
V ISTA DEL M AR
ROSE DR
HIDDENH LI LS R D
PROSPECT AVE
ESPERANZA RD
Santa Ana River
Chino Hills
State Park
YORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA
BICYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN CRASHES
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
0 0.75 1.5 MILES
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
CRASHES
Bike Crashes
! Fatality
! Severe Injury
! Visible Injury or Complaint
Pedestrian Crashes
! Fatality
! Severe Injury
! Visible Injury or Complaint
BOUNDARIES
City Boundaries
Disadvantaged Community
Parks
Water
The collision data from 2013 to 2022 is provide by
Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS),
Safe Transportation Research and Education
Center, University of California, Berkeley. 2024.
Active Transportation Plan 57 Needs Analysis
Crash Locations
Assessment
A review of crash data (2018-2022) identified
11 locations in Yorba Linda and Placentia that
had experienced collisions resulting in fatalities
or serious injuries to people walking or biking.
These locations received countermeasure
suggestions that can effectively reduce future
serious or fatality crashes. The lists below
summarize the locations and suggested
countermeasures.
The studied crash locations in order of
recency are:
1. Valley View Circle & Bramble Court,
Yorba Linda
2. North Rose Drive & Landmark Avenue,
Yorba Linda
3. Casa Loma Avenue & Imperial Highway,
Yorba Linda
4. Stonewood Drive & Hidden Hills Road,
Yorba Linda
5. North Kraemer Boulevard & East
Bastanchury Road, Placentia
6. Dorinda Road & Yorba Linda Boulevard,
Yorba Linda
7. Welsh Pony Lane & Red Roan Lane,
Yorba Linda
8. Van Buren Street & Yorba Linda Boulevard,
Yorba Linda
9. South Melrose Street & West La Jolla
Street, Placentia
10. Casa Oro Drive & Casa Hermosa Drive,
Yorba Linda
11. North Community Drive & Orangethorpe
Avenue, Placentia
The countermeasures below summarize the
types of improvements that both cities can
make citywide to address broader systemic
issues within their transportation network.
Details about countermeasures at each
specific location can be found in Appendix H:
Crash Locations Assessment.
º Stripe high-visibility crosswalk markings
º Implement traffic calming devices for traffic
control and speed management
º Construct bike facilities
º Conduct an impaired driver campaign
The Federal Highway Administration’s Proven
Safety Countermeasures resource provides
further info on infrastructure strategies
that can be applied systemically to reduce
roadway fatalities and serious injuries involving
pedestrians and bicyclists.
Suitability
Analysis
The suitability analysis identified potential
areas where easements could be implemented
to extend existing active transportation
infrastructure or create new infrastructure
using proximity to common destinations and
environmental variables included in land use
data (Figure 22. Yorba Linda and Placentia
Suitable Parcels for Active Transportation).
A suitability score was created based on both
the distance of parcels from destinations such
as commercial district areas, libraries, schools,
city halls, and parks; proximity to disadvantaged
communities; and environmental data.
Environmental data included a review of parcels
that may be susceptible to natural disasters
such as those in the 100 Year Flood Plain, in an
earthquake fault zone, or in a landslide hazard
zone. Environmental data also included a review
of parcels in wildlife habitats and conservation
areas. The highest-scoring parcels were used
by the project team as areas to study during
fieldwork and to consider for improved and new
active transportation recommendations. The
highest-scoring parcels are those that connect
to the most destinations and disadvantaged
communities, are at lower risks for natural
disasters, and would be least disruptive to
natural habitats.
Needs Analysis 58 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 22. Yorba Linda and Placentia Suitable Parcels for Active Transportation
Active Transportation Plan 59 Needs Analysis
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Public Outreach 04 and Engagement
Public Outreach and Engagement 62 Yorba Linda-Placentia Introduction
Community engagement is important for
understanding the needs and desires of the
community members who may use the active
transportation improvements recommended
in this Plan. A variety of engagement
strategies were used to gather feedback
for the Plan from Yorba Linda and Placentia
residents. Community members and visitors
were engaged through pop-up events, flyer
distribution, social media posts, community
workshops, demonstration events, and
online tools.
These community engagement approaches
targeted Yorba Linda and Placentia residents,
people who work in both cities, and visitors
to both cities. Participants had the option to
discuss their primary mode of transportation,
express their concerns about the current active
transportation system in Yorba Linda and
Placentia, and provide suggestions that reflect
their needs. Based on community feedback,
this Plan identified areas where community
members do not feel comfortable walking and
biking. This feedback was also used to develop
the recommendations in this Plan.
Social Media
Social media posts were published by the
Cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia to promote
the project and the in-person and virtual
community meetings and explain how to
comment during the initial outreach period.
The posts were developed by the outreach
team and posted regularly on the Cities’ social
media accounts on Facebook, Instagram,
and Twitter. The posts included project
information, meeting information, and a call to
action to provide comments on the online map
to be incorporated into the draft Plan.
The complete archive of social media posts
can be referenced in Appendix C: Public
Outreach Summary.
Outreach Notification
To effectively notify community members in
Yorba Linda and Placentia about the draft
Active Transportation Plan and encourage
them to submit feedback, the Plan was
advertised in a variety of ways, such as email
notifications, social media, City newsletters,
and flyers.
Email Notification
Emails were distributed to the stakeholder
email list to promote the start of the initial
outreach period, community meetings, and
the online comment map, and encourage
participation throughout. A total of four
emails were distributed to the stakeholder
list consisting of approximately 160 email
addresses between Wednesday, November
29, 2023, and the closing of the outreach
period on Wednesday, January 31, 2024.
Outreach Methods
Active Transportation Plan 63 Public Outreach and Engagement Community Meeting Flyer
The community meeting flyers promoted the
project, the upcoming community meetings,
and the project webpage, and explained how
to submit feedback. See Appendix C: Public
Outreach Summary for an example of the
community meeting flyer. Virtual community
meeting flyers were distributed via social
media posts and City email notifications.
The flyers were used to directly notify the
community and to inform residents of key
areas, with physical flyers distributed to the
following community locations:
º Fenix Cycling (Yorba Linda)
º Jax Bicycle Center (Yorba Linda)
º Placentia Library (Placentia)
º Whitten Community Center (Placentia)
Project Website
The project website (virtualeventroom.com/
yorba-linda-placentia-atp) served as the
clearinghouse for all public Plan information,
including the project overview, goals, and
schedule. The website linked community
members to project maps and fact sheets, kept
them up to date with the Plan’s progress, and
provided a forum for the review of recorded
community meetings. The website also posted
flyers about upcoming meetings. The fact
sheets and community meeting materials
were available in both English and Spanish.
Furthermore, community members could
provide feedback, contact the project team,
and sign up for project notifications via the
project website.
Public Outreach and Engagement 64 Yorba Linda-Placentia Figure 23. Yorba Linda and Placentia Online Feedback Map Screenshot Online Feedback Map
Available on the project website, the online
feedback map was a public interactive map
allowing community members to virtually
select specific locations that they would like
to see walking and biking improvements on.
Existing and planned facilities were shown to
help community members identify network
connections across the two cities. Participants
could drop points or draw lines with comments
on the map for improvements to active
transportation trails, bikeways, pathways,
and more. Participants could then “like” or
“dislike” other comments that they did or did
not agree with, which helped to show which
improvements or connections had the most
public support. Over 200 comments were
received on the map between October 2023
and February 2024. See Appendix C: Public
Outreach Summary for the database. General
themes included:
º Make sidewalk and crossing improvements
(e.g., curb ramps, crossing signals)
º Close gaps in trail and bikeway networks
º Improve access to Chino Hills State Park,
Carbon Canyon, and surrounding cities
º Better maintain existing active
transportation facilities
The public online feedback map (Figure 23.
Yorba Linda and Placentia Online Feedback
Map Screenshot) is useful in understanding
community needs and recommending
infrastructure and programming that can
appropriately address these needs. The online
feedback map comments, lines, and points
were transferred to geographic information
systems mapping software to make the
recommendations in this Plan. In this way,
bicycle routes or pedestrian improvements
could be recommended in the exact areas
where community members have concerns.
Active Transportation Plan 65 Public Outreach and Engagement Outreach Events
Date & Time Event Walks-Ups Barrier &
Destination
Sticky Notes
Sign-Ups Feedback
Forms
Saturday, October 14,
2023
10 a.m. – 4 p.m.
Placentia Heritage Festival
Tri-City Regional Park
2301 N. Kraemer Blvd.,
Placentia, CA 92870
50 (2
Spanish
speakers)
20 3 4 (written)
Saturday,
December 2, 2023
4 p.m. – 9 p.m.
Holiday on Main Street
4905 Main St.
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
40 1 2 0
Saturday,
May 4, 2024
Yorba Days
Main Street Yorba Linda, 4910
Main St, Yorba Linda, CA
92886
40 18 0 2
Tuesday,
October 8, 2024
Yorba Linda Community
Center
4501 Casa Loma Ave, Yorba
Linda, CA 92886
40 NA 0 1
Thursday,
October 10, 2024
6 p.m.- 8p.m.
Old Town LIVE! Autumn Series
100 Block of Santa Fe Avenue
Placentia, CA 92870
3 NA 0 0
Saturday,
October 19, 2024
7:30 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Placentia Heritage Festival
401 E Chapman Avenue
Placentia, CA 92870
60 NA 0 1
Outreach events provide an opportunity for Table 4. Interactive Pop-Ups community members who may not typically be
engaged in the planning process to provide
their feedback and suggestions. The project
team hosted four pop-up events, one virtual
town hall, one virtual workshop, two in-person
community meetings, one parent-teacher
association (PTA) council presentation and
walk audits at 28 project schools in PlacentiaYorba Linda Unified School District.
Interactive Pop-Ups
Four interactive pop-up events were held at
community events in each city during the fall
of 2023 and the summer of 2024. Table 4
provides details for each event:
The pop-up events allowed the project team
to go directly to the public to seek input,
engage the community, and inform them
about the project. The team shared the fact
sheets in English and Spanish with booth
visitors and had sign-in sheets to add to the
project distribution database, presentation
boards that provided information on bicycle
and pedestrian facilities, and iPads with the
online feedback map. Additionally, a physical
version of the online feedback map with barrier
Public Outreach and Engagement 66 Yorba Linda-Placentia and destination sticky notes was available
as another means to collect data. Feedback
forms were also used to encourage attendees
to submit comments on the project. Common
topics heard from the community included
support for the Plan and active transportation
generally, the need for traffic light
improvements on certain streets, concerns
about uncomfortable walking conditions due to
drivers not stopping for pedestrians, the need
for more visible crosswalks and timed crossing
lights, the desire for separating bike lanes and
driving lanes, the need for ramps on sidewalks,
and the importance of maintaining horse trails.
Monday,
October 21, 2024
Yorba Linda Public Library
4852 Lakeview Ave, Yorba
Linda, CA 92886
30 NA 0 0
Friday,
October 25, 2024
Placentia Library
411 E Chapman Ave,
Placentia, CA 92870
20 NA 0 0
Wednesday,
October 30, 2024
3:30 p.m.- 4:30 p.m.
Yorba Linda Country Riders
Meeting Virtual
4 NA NA NA
Total Engagement 287 39 5 8
Active Transportation Plan 67 Public Outreach and Engagement Virtual Town Hall
The virtual town hall, held via Zoom on
January 11, 2024, included a welcome, staff
introductions, and a project presentation, and
concluded with an informal question-andanswer session. A Zoom Spanish interpretation channel was available.
Eight participants attended the virtual town
hall, including representatives from community
organizations such as the Yorba Linda Traffic
Commission, Canyon Velo Cycling Club, Cal
State Fullerton, and the Orange County Health
Care Agency. Key themes and concerns
raised by participants included accessibility
for submitting comments, bike and pedestrian
crash statistics, data from fitness tracking apps,
existing planned improvements, current bike
lanes and pedestrian features, bike and car
parking, and connections to bike lanes and
trails in other cities.
Final Virtual Workshop
A second virtual community meeting was
held on October 22, 2024, with 13 attendees
participating, including representatives from
local organizations such as the Canyon Velo
Cycling Club, Wagner Elementary School,
Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District,
and Orange County Sheriff’s Department.
The meeting focused on providing an update
on the Plan’s progress and gathering additional
input from community members on the draft
Plan and recommendations. There was general
support for the recommendations presented,
and several participants requested that the
meeting’s presentation be made available on
the project website for further review.
In-Person
Community Meeting
As part of the project’s outreach process, two
in-person community meetings were held,
taking place in each of the partnering cities.
The first in-person meeting was conducted at
the Yorba Linda Public Library in Yorba Linda
on January 17, 2024. The second in-person
meeting was held at the Whitten Community
Center in Placentia on January 18, 2024.
These in-person community meetings followed
an open house format, which helped to solicit
meaningful feedback and engagement with
participants. The format allowed participants
to attend at their leisure and created a more
casual and inviting atmosphere. These
workshops featured display boards, along with
project staff strategically placed around the
room at “stations” that featured specific topics.
The project staff also facilitated conversations
and answered questions.
Each meeting began with a brief introduction
presentation that included a welcome, an
overview of the Plan, its purpose and goals,
and an overview of outreach efforts. The
meetings featured seven project poster boards
and fact sheets, and feedback forms were
provided to attendees at the welcome and
sign-in table at the entrance. Participants
were encouraged to submit written comments
through the feedback form as well as via the
project website.
Seven participants attended the first meeting
in Yorba Linda, and two attended the second
meeting in Placentia. Participants included
representatives from Moms of Yorba Linda,
the Orange County Sheriff’s Department,
the Yorba Linda Traffic Commission, the
Canyon Velo Cycling Club, and the Yorba
Linda Planning Commission. Key themes and
concerns raised included pedestrian safety,
the need for more crosswalks, especially
around schools, tree roots damaging
sidewalks, the addition and separation of
bike lanes and vehicle travel lanes, signage
for bike lanes, updated signal and crosswalk
timing, grant and funding distribution,
active transportation trails in Placentia (near
Bastanchury Road), and trail amenities.
Public Outreach and Engagement 68 Yorba Linda-Placentia PTA Council
Presentations
The project team presented at a PlacentiaYorba Linda Unified Council of PTAs/PTSAs meeting on June 5, 2024. This presentation
provided general information on the project
and recent updates, and garnered feedback.
It included a project overview and discussion
of the project’s schedule, goals, technical
study updates, walk audits, and a survey
summary. The project team provided a flyer
to promote the upcoming release of the draft
recommendations, and a fact sheet in English
and Spanish. Attendees were informed that
they can provide feedback at any time on the
project website and via the parent survey..
School Walk Audits
The project team observed school arrival or
dismissal at each of the 28 project schools.
The purpose of these observations was to
understand school circulation patterns, identify
barriers to walking and biking, and document
driver behavior. Each school observation was
coupled with a walk audit conducted with
school stakeholders. School stakeholders
included parents/caregivers, principals,
school staff, and others. The purpose of the
walk audits was to introduce participants to
the project and its goals, teach participants
about Safe Routes to School infrastructure
and non-infrastructure strategies, and provide
opportunities for participants to provide input
on their needs, concerns, and preferences.
Walk audits also included identification and
documentation of barriers to safe walking,
biking, skateboarding, and scooting to and
from school.
The project team gave walk audit participants
pens, clipboards, and maps of their school.
Maps displayed existing conditions within a
one-quarter and one-half mile radius of the
school. The maps also included space for
participants to record notes. All materials
were provided in English and Spanish, and
outreach was conducted in English with
Spanish interpretation as needed. The project
team invited participants to communicate
deficiencies and safety concerns about
routes to school verbally or via the paper
walk audit map. The project team was on
hand to document the participants’ feedback
and discuss potential solutions to improve
active transportation conditions along the
route to school. The feedback from walk audit
participants heavily informed the infrastructure
and non-infrastructure components of each
school’s project recommendations. Each
school’s observation and walk audit were
summarized in a Walk Audit Report.
A summary of each school’s audit can
be found in Chapter 5. The full Walk Audit
Report can be found in Appendix C: Public
Outreach Summary.
Active Transportation Plan 69 Public Outreach and Engagement Technical Advisory
Committee Meetings
Seven Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
meetings were held throughout the Plan
development. The TAC members provided
feedback on project materials including
the draft recommendations and prioritized
projects. The TAC also helped the Cities better
understand issues and challenges related to
active transportation and provided context for
this multi-jurisdictional project. Additionally,
the TAC offered information about community
events where pop-ups could be held and
suggested channels the Cities could use to
market the Plan to community members. TAC
members also advised on potential projects
and programmatic recommendations with
consideration to the Plan’s goals. The TAC
also helped the project team reach
disadvantaged community members in the
planning process and helped ensure that
the two partnering cities considered their
needs when forming recommendations.
TAC members helped the project team by
advertising Plan activities and engagement
opportunities and encouraging their networks
to participate in providing feedback.
Recommendations 05
Recommendations 72 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Introduction
families safe while walking or biking to
school. The Plan also includes recommended
infrastructure that closes crucial gaps,
connects City infrastructure to neighboring
cities, and provides connections through
areas where there are barriers to using active
transportation. Previous planning documents
such as each city’s General Plans, and
existing Capital Improvement Programs
(CIP) were also considered during the
recommendations process.
Safety was also an important factor in deciding
where active transportation recommendations
were needed. Completed safety analyses for
this Plan helped identify where improvements
and countermeasures were needed, and the
types of recommendations that would best
address these safety issues.
Finally, community input played an important
role in the recommendation process. The
bicycle and pedestrian recommendations
in this Plan were built on feedback received
from public outreach and engagement events,
interactive town halls, and open houses and
workshops. The recommendations were
developed to fit the needs of the community
members who will one day use these facilities.
Chapter Layout
This chapter is divided into four sections. The
first section, starting on page 73 provides
more information about the process that was
followed to develop the recommendations in
this Plan. This section also includes a toolkit of
facilities and infrastructure recommended, and
explains potential tradeoffs involved.
The second and third sections detail
recommendations for Yorba Linda and
Placentia, respectively. This includes the
bicycle recommendations, pedestrian
recommendations in the pedestrian priority
zones, and the Safe Routes to School
recommendations for each city.
The final section contains a list of noninfrastructure program recommendations for both cities. These programmatic
recommendations are important for creating
an active transportation network that bicyclists
and pedestrians feel comfortable using.
Developing recommendations for a MultiAgency Active Transportation Plan requires a holistic understanding of community
conditions, needs, and values. This includes:
º Previous planning documents and policies
º The existing bicycle and pedestrian
infrastructure and network gaps
º The existing trail network
º Road level of traffic stress
º Collision history
º Frequently visited destinations
º Consideration of community desires
This Plan is focused on improvements that
will enable residents to safely use active
transportation to connect to local and regional
destinations while focusing on the needs and
concerns expressed by the residents of Yorba
Linda and Placentia.
For both bicycle and pedestrian
recommendations, connections to frequently
visited destinations were important in the
Plan’s recommendations process. The Plan
includes Safe Routes to School (STRS)
recommendations near schools in Yorba
Linda and Placentia to keep children and
Active Transportation Plan 73 Recommendations
Recommendations Process/Methodology
To develop recommendations for pedestrian
infrastructure, the project team identified
three priority zones spanning Yorba Linda
and Placentia. These zones encompass
disadvantaged communities, and areas
with a high need for improved infrastructure,
multiple pedestrian destinations, and a built
environment supportive of walking, including
downtown districts and bustling commercial
centers. The pedestrian recommendations
in these zones are centered on establishing
safe, high-quality crossings for pedestrians at
critical intersections and arterial roads, while
also implementing traffic calming measures in
zones experiencing high pedestrian activity.
This approach not only enhances pedestrian
safety but also promotes walkability and
connectivity within these urban hubs.
To develop the most effective bicycle
recommendations, the project team carefully
considered existing street conditions, the
surrounding context, and public input.
The proposed bicycle network establishes
comprehensive infrastructure across Yorba
Linda and Placentia, prioritizing primary eastwest and north-south connections. The public input map and suggestions from community
groups and stakeholders were used to
identify gaps within the existing network
and the most popular routes to destinations
around the city that could accommodate
bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. Many
recommendations enhance existing lanes
with improved separation and protection from
moving vehicles.
In both Placentia and Yorba Linda, new
routes were strategically planned to optimize
connections between major destinations
such as schools, parks, civic centers, and
commercial areas, considering factors such
as roadway stress, topography, land use, and
feasibility.
Each of the recommendations in this Plan is
planning-level. Recommendations were made
considering each of the factors described
above; however, additional design and
engineering studies will be required to verify
the feasibility of each recommendation before
implementation. Some corridors, notably Yorba
Linda Boulevard, in Yorba Linda and Placentia
will require further study to determine the
feasibility and design of bicycle and pedestrian
infrastructure. Yorba Linda Boulevard is a
major arterial that would provide a key bicycle
connection between the two cities, however
due to current traffic volumes and speeds a
Class I or Class IV bikeway is necessary to
create the most comfortable experience for
bicyclists. A corridor specific study should be
performed to address these issues and design
safe and feasible bike infrastructure along the
boulevard.
Finally, in order to create an active
transportation network that provides access
across major barriers like state highways,
Yorba Linda and Placentia may need to
coordinate with other jurisdictions such as
Caltrans, Orange County Public Works, the City
of Fullerton, and CSU Fullerton. For example,
proposed ADA Ramps at Placentia Avenue
and Santa Fe Avenue, below State Route 57
(Orange Freeway), are at a location considered
Tier 2 (medium need) in the Caltrans Active
Transportation (CAT) Plan. The CAT Plan also
identifies Orangethorpe Avenue as a Tier 2
corridor. Accordingly, these ADA ramps and
recommendations along Orangethorpe Avenue
should be coordinated with Caltrans when they
are ready to be implemented.
Bicycle Recommendation
Guidance
Yorba Linda currently has 35 miles of existing
bicycle facilities. Placentia has 21.3 miles of
existing bicycle facilities. Between both cities,
an additional 60 miles are recommended to
construct new or improved bikeways. Table 5
shows the mileage of proposed bikeways in
both cities.
Recommendations 74 Yorba Linda-Placentia
This Plan will improve the bicycle network to
increase the number of people using active
transportation. The facilities recommended will
be safe and appropriate for the type of bicyclist
that will be using them. Some of the streets in
Yorba Linda and Placentia, such as Kraemer
Boulevard and Bastanchury Road, are most
appropriate for adult bicyclists who are highly
confident riding their bicycles. Safe facilities
were recommended with these bicyclists
in mind. In these cases, the recommended
facilities may not lower the level of traffic stress
enough to be comfortable for all bicyclists.
In other areas, such as on slower
neighborhood streets near schools, facilities
were chosen with families and school-aged
bicyclists in mind.
In Placentia, bikeway recommendation
emphasis was placed on creating north-south
and east-west connections throughout the City
and providing bikeway options separated from
motor vehicles. Yorba Linda has an extensive
existing off-street trail network that can be
used by bicyclists. Bikeway recommendations
in Yorba Linda were proposed to focus on
connections to these trails without significant
disruption to motor vehicle travel.
City Bikeway Class Existing Mileage Recommended Mileage Placentia Class I Shared-Use Path 0.9 2.0
Class II Bike Lanes 9.0 1.2
Class IIB Buffered Bike Lane 0 5.4
Class III Bike Route 9.4 0
Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard 0 7.2
Class IV Separated Bikeway 0 8.5
Placentia Total 21.3 Miles 24.3 Miles
Yorba Linda Class I Shared-Use Path 13.4 .4
Class II Bike Lanes 18.5 8.3
Class IIB Buffered Bike Lane 0 4.5
Class III Bike Route 2.9 0
Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard 0 11.4
Class IV Separated Bikeway .17 0
Yorba Linda Total 35.0 Miles 24.6 Miles
Combined City Totals 56.3 Miles 48.9 Miles
Table 5. Existing and Proposed Bikeway Mileage
Active Transportation Plan 75 Recommendations
Bicycle Recommendations Toolkit
Figure 24. Bicycle Facility Descriptions shows the facilities that were considered for the bicycle recommendations in this Plan. Each facility includes an example photo and a description of the facility’s applicability. Each colored circle around the photos continues in the recommendations maps.
Figure 24. Bicycle Facility Descriptions
CLASS I
Shared-Use Path
º Paths completely separated from motor
vehicle traffic used by people walking
and biking.
º Comfortable for people of all ages and
abilities.
º Typically located immediately adjacent
and parallel to a roadway or in its own
independent right-of-way, such as within a
park or along a body of water.
º Bike lanes with at least 5 feet of separation
from traffic vehicle lanes are also considered
shared-use paths.
CLASS IIB
Buffered Bicycle Lane
º A dedicated lane for bicycle travel
separated from a motor vehicle travel lane
by a painted buffer.
º The buffer provides additional comfort
for users by providing space from
motor vehicles.
CLASS II
Bicycle Lane
º A dedicated lane for bicycle travel
adjacent to a motor vehicle travel lane.
º A painted white line separates the bicycle
lane from motor vehicle traffic.
Recommendations 76 Yorba Linda-Placentia
CLASS IV
Separated Bikeway
º An on-street bikeway separated from
a motor vehicle travel lane by a curb,
median, planters, parked motor vehicles,
delineators, and/or other vertical elements.
CLASS IIIB
Bicycle Boulevard
º A signed bike route that bicyclists share
with motor vehicles.
º Can include pavement markings and traffic
calming features such as speed humps
and traffic diverters.
º Comfortable facility for cyclists who are
adept at riding with motor vehicles.
º Recommended for streets with low vehicle
volumes and speeds.
Active Transportation Plan 77 Recommendations
Bicycle Intersection Treatments
The following includes brief descriptions of
various intersection treatments that can further
enhance connectivity and accessibility for
bicyclists. Final intersection configurations can
be determined in later design phases by Yorba
Linda and Placentia.
BIKE BOXES
A bike box is a designated area at the front of a
traffic lane, typically marked by a colored box,
which allows bicyclists to position themselves
ahead of cars at a red light. This helps improve
visibility and traffic flow, while reducing
conflicts when the light turns green.
BIKE CROSSINGS
A bike crossing is a designated, marked path
that guides bicyclists through an intersection,
often paired with signage to alert drivers to the
presence of bicyclists. These crossings are
useful in areas where dedicated bike lanes do
not extend through the intersection, helping
ensure bicyclists navigate safely and efficiently.
BIKE SIGNALS
Bike signals are specialized traffic signals,
often integrated with existing vehicular signals,
designed solely for those on bikes. Bike signals
typically include dedicated green light phases
or advanced green lights for bicyclists.
PROTECTED INTERSECTIONS
Protected intersections separate bicyclists
from motor vehicles with physical barriers or
dedicated space, minimizing potential conflicts
through high-traffic intersections.
TWO-STAGE TURN QUEUE BOXES
A two-stage turn queue box consists of a
waiting area for bicyclists to stop before
making a left or right turn, allowing them to
clear the intersection and proceed without
conflicts from other vehicles. These are
particularly helpful for bicyclists turning left
from a right-side bike facility at large signalized
intersections.
E-Bikes
The increased prevalence of technology such
as electric bicycles (“e-bikes”) and electric
scooters has introduced a new element
to active transportation and trail safety
considerations. While these options allow users
to travel further with less effort, these devices
can currently reach up to 28mph, particularly
in areas where e-bikes may be sharing spaces
with pedestrians, bicyclists, and equestrians.
Yorba Linda and Placentia will continue to
monitor, educate and enforce e-bike policies
as appropriate.
There are three classes of e-bikes:
CLASS I
Pedal-assisted bikes reaching up to 20mph
CLASS II
Low-speed throttle-assisted bikes reaching up
to 20mph
CLASS III
Speed pedal-assisted bikes reaching up to
28mph
Recommendations 78 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Pedestrian
Recommendation
Guidance
Pedestrian infrastructure can help residents
safely and comfortably walk to their
destinations by providing them with designated
spaces separated from motor vehicles.
Pedestrian infrastructure such as sidewalks,
crossing facilities, curb treatments, and
traffic calming treatments can slow vehicles
and make walking feel safer. The pedestrian
infrastructure recommendations in this Plan
are intended to address critical gaps, and
focus on locations where infrastructure is
needed most, such as near schools, transit
stops, and other frequently visited destinations.
The recommendations seek to address the
most uncomfortable crossings and improve
connectivity within the pedestrian zones. The
recommended infrastructure was informed by
public comment and will improve pedestrian
connectivity to the most popular destinations
within the zones. As these zones become
more pedestrian oriented, denser land uses
can follow allowing for the development of
downtown commercial hubs within Yorba Linda
and Placentia.
Pedestrian Recommendations Toolkit
Figure 25. Pedestrian Facility Descriptions provides examples of pedestrian infrastructure recommended in this Plan.
Figure 25. Pedestrian Facility Descriptions
SIDEWALKS & PATHS
º Completely separated from motor vehicle
traffic.
º Used by people walking or using mobility
devices such as wheelchairs.
º Sidewalks are typically located
immediately adjacent and parallel to a
roadway. Shared-use paths can be located
in their own independent right-of-way, such
as within a park or along a body of water.
CROSSING FACILITIES
º Make crossing the street at intersections
and midblock safer and more comfortable.
º High-visibility crosswalk markings are more
visible to approaching vehicles and have
been shown to improve yielding behavior.
º Advance yield markings, or ”shark teeth,”
warn drivers they are approaching
a crosswalk.
Active Transportation Plan 79 Recommendations
CURB TREATMENTS
º Curb ramps allow users of all abilities
to make the transition from the street to
the sidewalk. They are required by the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
at all crosswalks, including those that
are unmarked.
º Directional curb oriented to the crosswalk
are preferred, as they enable pedestrians
with limited vision to align with the crossing
while waiting to cross and when entering
the roadway.
TRAFFIC CALMING
º Encourage drivers to travel at slower
speeds.
º Some treatments alter the configuration
of a roadway, while others change how
drivers perceive and respond to a street.
º Can be used at targeted locations
such as a busy intersection, or
along corridors.
BEACONS & SIGNALS
º Beacons and signals both indicate to
drivers that someone may be crossing
the street.
º Make crossing the street safer and more
comfortable.
º Pedestrian countdown signals create a
more predictable crossing environment
and give adequate warning to pedestrians
attempting to cross a roadway.
º Leading pedestrian intervals allow a
pedestrian to begin crossing the street
before the traffic signal turns green.
Recommendations 80 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Safe Routes to School
Safe Routes to School is an initiative that aims
to improve walking and biking conditions near
schools and to encourage students to use
active modes to get to and from school. The
goal of Safe Routes to School is to improve
kids’ safety and increase health and physical
activity. Successful Safe Routes to School
programs commonly include elements of each
of the five Es: Education, Encouragement,
Engineering, Evaluation, and Equity. Each E is
meant to remove barriers that prevent students
from walking and bicycling to school.
Safe Routes to School infrastructure is
important to provide safe, connected access
to schools for students, their families, and
all residents of Yorba Linda and Placentia.
The area within a half-mile radius around
each school was studied to make more
comprehensive recommendations to improve
Safe Routes to School. In-person walk audits
were completed for each of the study schools.
Audit findings were combined with the overall
recommendation approach to create a set of
recommendations for each school.
Safe Routes to School recommendations
are not separate from the bicycle and
pedestrian recommendations. Instead, many
of the recommendations in this chapter are
duplicated in both sections, as they work
together to create a robust network that
connects to multiple destinations.
Safe Routes to School recommendations
are included for each city after their
respective bicycle and pedestrian
recommendation section. Each project
school contains information about completed
walk audit findings and collision history.
Recommendations within a half mile of each
school are shown on each school’s map.
In addition to the recommendations shown for
each school, all schools received a detailed
school zone traffic control devices assessment.
This assessment reviewed the signage and
striping used near school campuses to verify
the devices comply with state regulations.
Signage, such as school zone signage, and
striping, such as at crosswalks, were reviewed
for considerations such as size, frequency, and
visibility. Details about this assessment can
be found in Appendix G: School Zone Traffic
Control Device Assessment Checklist.
PEDESTRIAN-SCALE LIGHTING
º Improves visibility for people walking, as
opposed to street lights intended to light
the roadway.
º Additional care and emphasis on
pedestrian lighting should be taken at and
near crosswalks.
Active Transportation Plan 81 Recommendations
Yorba Linda | Pedestrian Recommendations
Figure 26. Pedestrian Recommendations in Pedestrian Priority Zone: Yorba Linda Downtown, Yorba Linda 90 90
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
ADAMS
CEDAR
MONTEREY
RE WOHNE IS E
YNNUS
KAYE
WEST HILL
SUNSET LN
LAUREL VIEW
WEST TERRACE
SOUTHERN POINTE
SHADY KNL
ALICIA
TRUMAN
SUMMIT
LOGAN LINDA
IN A M
NORCRIS
ATI NAD
DRY CREEK
NEWBURY
FLORA
RUTH
SOUTHERN HILLS
BURKE
MAGEE
IA CNELAV
OAK LEAF
YORBA LN
SHOOK
GARDEN
LOS ALTOS LN
TEDFORD WY
VIA BUENA VIDA
LINDFORD
JOSHUA
FREDRICK
ALLEZ
IMPERIAL
VIA SERENO
YEL IN KC M
AVOLINDA
IE DNOC
WISTERIA
MONSON
TLEVESOOR
KENNEDY
SEQUOIA
SHARON
PARK
PIPER
CI TNAI N
DNAL H IG H
TOWN CENTER
JAMAICA TER
MELODY
HUMMINGBIRD
LA CASITA CARI
SIESTA
BEN LOMOND
EERT KAO
ARROYO
EVERGREEN
BOEING
HACIENDA
RIO DE ORO
RIO DE PLATA
NROCA
LOGAN VIEW
TIKI TORCH
LEMON
ODACOVA
AEHTROD
LAGON
DOUGLAS
SHOOK LN
SHAW LN
SCHOOL
ALE MAC
MOUNTAIN VIEW
PL
HAVEN
UMOSA
MARK
AD INLO
LOS ALTOS
DEBI
MANDARIN
ROCKY POINT
DEVILLE
YORBA LINDA
LAKEVIEW
LAKEVIEW
ORIENTE
BLAIR
ALTRUDY
EUREKA
YORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Parks
School Property
City Boundaries
PEDESTRIAN ZONES Recommendation
! ADA Ramps
Recommendation
Sidewalk Improvements
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Pedestrian Beacon
! Raised Crosswalk
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
0 0.06 0.12 MILES
Pedestrian Priority Zone
PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE:
YORBA LINDA DOWNTOWN
SRTS RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation
! Parking Restrictions
! Pedestrian Beacon
! Signage*
*School Advance Warning
Assembly D signage SW24-3
Recommendations 82 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Yorba Linda | Bicycle Recommendations
Figure 27. Yorba Linda Bicycle Recommendations
Ä142
Ä241
JEFFERSON ST
LEMON DR
PASEO DE LA CUMBRE
MARIPOSA AVE
PASEO DEL PRADO
EL CAJON AVE
BASTANCHURY RD PALM ST
PLUMOSA DR
EASTPARK DR
VALLEY VIEW
BUENA VISTA AVE
ORIENTE DR
EUREKA AVE
CASA LOMA AVE
ROSE DRIVE WABASH AVE
SAVI RANCH PKWY
DOMINGUEZ RANCH RD
PASEO DE LAS PALOMAS
SAN ANTONIO RD
FAIRMONTBLVD
PROSPECT AVE
LAKEVIEW AVE
VISTA DELMAR
ESPERANZARD
VILLAGE CENTER DR
Chino Hills
State Park
Santa Ana River
PLACENTIA
YORBA LINDA
YORBA LINDA BICYCLE
RECOMMENDATIONS
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
YORBA LINDA BIKE RECOMMENDATIONS
Class
I - Shared-Use Path
II - Bike Lane
IIB - Buffered Bike Lane
IIIB - Bicycle Boulevard
EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES
Class_Type
I - Shared-Use Path
II - Bike Lane
III - Bike Route
IV - Separated Bikeway
0 0.5 1 MILES
YORBA LINDA BLVD
YORBA LINDA BLVD
BIKEWAY TYPES
Class I
Shared Use Path
Class II
Bike Lane
Class IIB
Buffered Bike Lane
Class IIIB
Bicycle Boulevard
CAMINO DE BRYANT
V AI LOMAS DE YORBA E
PASEO DE LA CUMBRE
EASTPARK DR
SAVI RANCH PKWY
Santa Ana River
Active Transportation Plan 83 Recommendations
57 !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
Ä57
Kraemer
Memorial
Park
Santa
Fe Park
KRAEMER BLVD
CROWTHER AVE
BRADFORD AVE
PLACENTIA AVE
ORANGETHORPE AVE
CONCORD WY
CHAPMAN AVE
ENCINITA S WAY
LAVENDER LN
ALTA ST
MARSEILLE DR
SANTA FE AVE
HAWAII WY
SARA JANE
LN
CENTER ST
MONROE
WY
MAUI LN
TWILIGHT ST
CAMARILLO ST
BOYSENBERRY LN
MELODY LN
WALNUT AVE
MELROSE
ST
MAIN
ST
MURRAY ST
WILSON AVE
FRONTAGE
RD
MASSACHUSETTS LN
SANTE FE CT
INDUSTRIAL WAY
STARDUST ST
HUNDLEY ST
RADCLIFFE AVE
FRANKLIN DR
LANAI LN
SUNRISE ST
ANGELINA DR
ANNED
DR
LANCASTER AVE
RUTHERFORD RD
KIMBERLY AVE
NUTWOOD AVE
HARMONY LN
DEREK
DR
EVE
CIR
CARDINAL ST
PARTRIDGE
ST
KAUAI LN
VENTURA AVE
SANDPIPER AVE
SUNSET DR
OLIVE ST
PORTER
WY
BACKS LN
BAKER ST
CAPISTRANO
ST
KENSINGTON AVE
SANTA BARBARA
ST
RAMONA ST
KENT ST
MEADOWLARK
LN
PHEASANT ST
TEMPLE
ST
Kraemer
Middle
Valencia High
Valadez Middle
School
Academy
PEDESTRIAN
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
Parks
School Property
Old Town Placentia Streetscape
Master Plan Area
PEDESTRIAN ZONE
RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Pedestrian Refuge Island
Sidewalk Improvements
Traffic Calming
Pedestrian Priority Zone
SRTS RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation ! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Pedestrian Beacon
! Stop Warrant
!Yield Markings
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
0 0.07 0.15 MILES
Chapman and Kraemer
Placentia
Placentia | Pedestrian Recommendations
Figure 28. Pedestrian Recommendations in Pedestrian Priority Zone: Chapman and Kraemer, Placentia
Recommendations 84 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 29. Pedestrian Recommendations in Pedestrian Priority Zone: McFadden Park !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
! !
Ä91
Ä57
PLACENTIA AVE
MELROSE ST
CROWTHER AVE
MOISI
LN
ORANGETHORPE AVE
LAWRENCE AVE
PARAD SI E ST
BLUE
GUM
ST
LA JOLLA ST
BOYSENBERRY LN PORTER WY
MIRALOMA WAY
BRIARVALE AVE
DUNN
WAY
LA CRESTA AVE
EAST PARK LN FASHION
LN
INDUSTRIAL WAY
REGAL PARK DR
SUNSHINE WY
OHIO AVE
TERRACE ST
DALY ST
BUCCANEER
DR
KANSAS AVE
CYPRESS S
W
T
ALLGREEN
ST
BALSAM AVE
KIMBERLY AVE
MISSOURI AVE
MIRALOMA AVE
ROMNEYA DR
IOWA PL
TAFOLLA ST
CORONADO ST
TSTISKNUS
VAN
HORN
WY
HUNDLEY
WAY
ARNOLD
DR
LAWRENCE
ST
AVE
DE
PIO
PICO
GRETTA LN
VIA BURTON
RED
GUM
ST
TEMPLE
ST
Melrose
Elementary
Valadez
Middle School
Academy
PEDESTRIAN
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
Parks
School Property
Old Town Placentia Streetscape
Master Plan Area
PEDESTRIAN ZONE
RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Pedestrian Refuge Island
! Pedestrian Beacon
! Signage*
*No Right Turn On Red (R10-11)
Sidewalk Improvements
Pedestrian Priority Zone
SRTS RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
!Signage*
*SR4-1
! Speed Feedback Sign
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
0 0.07 0.15 MILES
McFadden Park
Placentia
Active Transportation Plan 85 Recommendations
Placentia | Bicycle Recommendations
Figure 30. Placentia Bicycle Recommendations
Ä142
Ä57
Ä90 VALLE Y VIEW CIR
MELROSE ST
CROWTHER AVE
YORBA LINDA BLVD
TS OI HO
VALLEY VIEW AVE
JEFFERSON ST
RUBY DR
DVLB EERFFUT
BUENA VISTA AVE
BRADFORD AVE
PLACENTIA AVE
DR DLEI F HCI R
GOLDEN AVE
ALTA VISTA ST
TS NERUB NAV
CHAPMAN AVE
EVA IA CNELAV
ALAMOLN
DVLB RE MEARK
EVA ODACOVA
EVA NEVAHKOORB
VIA ROMA
SANTA FE AVE
GRANDVIEW
AVE
PALM AVE
BASTANCHURY RD
MADISON AVE
ORANGETHORPE AVE
PLUMOSA DR
HIGHLAND AVE
ROSE DR
SOMERSET DR
FOXFIELD LN
MORSE AVE
SPAHN LN
SAGA DR
ORANGE DR
LAKEVIEW AVE
SUNMIST DR
SHORT ST
VIA RODEO
PROSPECT AVE MIRALOMA AVE
EVA AKERUE
WABASH AVE
KELLOGG
DR
EL CAJON AVE
ANGELINA DR
LEMON DR
PALM DR
LA JOLLA ST
CASA LOMA AVE
RD RE MAH
2ND ST
PORTER WY
WALNUT ST
RD NELTRAC
MERIENDA LN
ORIENTE DR
FEE ANA ST
TUSTIN AVE
Chino Hills
State Park
Santa Ana River
PLACENTIA
YORBA LINDA
PLACENTIA BICYCLE
RECOMMENDATIONS
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLACENTIA BIKE RECOMMENDATIONS
I - Shared-Use Path
II - Bike Lane
IIB - Buffered Bike Lane
IIIB - Bicycle Boulevard
IV - Separated Bikeway
EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES Class_Type
I - Shared-Use Path
II - Bike Lane
III - Bike Route
IV - Separated Bikeway
0 0.35 0.7 MILES
Recommendations 86 Yorba Linda-Placentia
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Active Transportation Plan 87 Recommendations
The following section presents information
about walk audit findings and collision history
near each school. Recommendations within a
quarter mile of each school are shown on each
school’s map.
*Glenknoll Elementary School is located in
Unincorporated Orange County. It is listed
here due to its proximity to Yorba Linda,
however any recommendations will need to be
coordinated with Orange County Public Works
for implementation.
Yorba Linda | Safe Routes to
School Recommendations
This Plan evaluates all 12 Placentia-Yorba
Linda Unified School District schools in
Yorba Linda:
1. Bernardo Yorba Middle School
2. Bryant Ranch Elementary School
3. Fairmont Elementary School
4. Glenknoll Elementary School*
5. Lakeview Elementary School
6. Linda Vista Elementary School
7. Mabel M. Paine Elementary School
8. Rose Drive Elementary School
9. Travis Ranch School
10. Van Buren Elementary School
11. Yorba Linda High School
12. Yorba Linda Middle School
Recommendations 88 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Bike lane and 40-mph speed limit along Fairmont
Boulevard in front of Bernardo Yorba Middle
School
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 5350 Fairmont Blvd., Yorba Linda,
CA 92886
º Grades: 7–8
º 2023 Enrollment: 556
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
A high-visibility crosswalk was recommended
on the north leg of Futura Drive/Manor View
Drive to alert drivers that pedestrians may be
in the area.
A leading pedestrian interval (LPI) at Fairmont
Boulevard/Old Ranch Road will provide
pedestrians with additional crossing time.
Bernardo Yorba Middle School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Speeding appears prevalent along
Fairmont Boulevard, which includes hilly
and winding topography and several
school crossings Further speed studies
need to be conducted to verify speed
conditions..
º Students are crossing at Futura Drive
at Manor View Drive, which presents
possible conflicts with vehicles exiting the
parking lot.
º Back trails and neighborhood
streets offer significant active travel to
school opportunities.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision within
a quarter mile of the school.
Active Transportation Plan 89 Recommendations
Figure 31. Bernardo Yorba Middle School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
FUTURA
LLI HKO
ORBLYNNBROOK PLAZA
PASEO J
OAQUIN
VIA ANGELINA
PARKHURST
ENI PUL
VIA MARIA
AMBERDALE
KINGSBR
BLUEFIELD IAR
S
H
A
DY GLEN
OLD RANCH
HILLCOCK VIEW
PASEO LUIS
VIA ADELA
OAK MEADOW
VIA NATALIE
FAIRMONT
PASEO GILBERTO
VIA SARA
VISTA MO
N
TA
N
A
VIA MONITA
RIDGEWOOD
PASEO ARNALDO
VIA VIRGINIA
VISTA
LAGUNA
MANOR VIEW
LYNRIDGE
DUNSMUIR
LE MANS
PASEO DE LAS PALOMAS
M
ARYNELL
BURLEIGH
Kingsbriar
Park
Bernardo
Yorba
Middle
Fairmont
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation ! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
Existing Trails
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Bernardo Yorba Middle
Yorba Linda
! ! Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
Recommendations 90 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Vehicle queuing during dismissal time
Bryant Ranch Elementary School
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 24695 Paseo De Toronto, Yorba Linda,
CA
º Grades: TK–5
º 2023 Enrollment: 570
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends implementing traffic
calming measures along Paseo De Toronto
in front of the school to slow down traffic,
particularly for vehicles traveling downhill.
To prevent drivers from entering through the
exit lane at the northern parking lot, the existing
Do Not Enter signage should be enlarged to
ensure it is visible to drivers.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Some vehicles have been observed
disregarding signage and entering through
the exit lane. Improving sign visibility and
limiting exiting traffic to right turns only may
improve compliance.
º Vehicle queuing during dismissal
creates possible pedestrian crossing
conflicts.
º Speeding appears prevalent along
Paseo De Toronto, while hilly and winding
topography limits sight distance. Traffic
calming and speed management
strategies should be considered. Further
speed studies need to be conducted to
verify speed conditions.
º Rear access through Woods Fields could
help alleviate pick-up pressure on Paseo
De Toronto.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have not been any bicycle or pedestrian
collisions within a quarter mile of the school
during the study years.
Active Transportation Plan 91 Recommendations
Figure 32. Bryant Ranch Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
V A CA I N
TADA
PATRICIA
PASEO DE TORONTO
LAS PATRANAS
A BUE I V
A SUE N TE R
NICOLE
CAMINO FAMOSA
ETACET
O IN M
AC
VIA NUEVA
CAMINO DE BESAR
LOS ADORNOS
VIA MELINDA
IRONSTONE
LOS ESTADOS
VIA LO
MAS DE
YORBA EAST
VIA
VALLARTA
CAMINO PONIE
N
TE
CAM DE BRYANT
CAMINO DORADO
ABBEY GLEN
LOS RIOS
LOS MONTEROS
Chino Hills State
Park
Bryant
Ranch
Park
Las Brisas
Park
Bryant Ranch
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
! Signage*
Traffic Calming
Recommendation *Enlarge existing Do Not Enter
Exit Only sign at school driveway
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Bryant Ranch Elementary
Yorba Linda
Recommendations 92 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Fairmont Elementary School
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends implementing a
high-visibility crosswalk and leading pedestrian
interval (LPI) at the Fairmont Boulevard/Yorba
Linda Boulevard intersection. The high-visibility
crosswalk and LPI will enhance safety of
pedestrians by increasing their visibility
to drivers.
A sidewalk and bike lane near Fairmont
Elementary
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º The intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard
and Fairmont Boulevard is a major
intersection with many students crossing
it. Though four crossing guards are staffed
here, traffic calming can enhance
crossing comfort.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been four pedestrian collisions and
two bicycle collisions within a quarter mile of
the school. One of the pedestrian collisions,
which occurred at the intersection of Fairmont
Boulevard and Lorca Lane, was fatal, though
this collision occurred at night, outside of
school hours.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 5241 Fairmont Blvd., Yorba Linda, CA
92886
º Grades: TK–6
º 2023 Enrollment: 809
Active Transportation Plan 93 Recommendations
Figure 33. Fairmont Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
!
FUTURA
YORBA VISTA
EASY
S
TONE CANYON
CARMONITA
SANDSPOINT
FAIRMO
N
T
WEST KNOLL
PASATIEMPO
SHADOW HILL
OLLAPAR
ORLANDO
ESCALO
N
A
LOMBARDY
DORAL
ON IA LA
WENDOVER
LOGANA
SU
M
AC RIDGE
PARK RIDGE
NOVA
YORBA LINDA
WIL WAGON WHEEL
LOWBROOK
MICKEL LN
M
ARYNELL
L
KEL
YNRIDGE
LOGG
KENTWATER
MAJORCA
VENECIA
LE MANS
VILLAGERGRA
N
ADA
BURLEIGH
CAPRICE
Gun Club
Road
Linear
Park
Fairmont
Knolls Park
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
! High Visibility Crosswalk
Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
Existing Trails
!
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Fairmont Elementary
Yorba Linda
Recommendations 94 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Glenknoll Elementary School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Some cars fail to yield to pedestrians
at intersections adjacent to Glenknoll
Elementary. These intersections would be
improved by additional all-way stop sign
and high-visibility crosswalks compared to
current yield signs.
º Some parents waiting to pick up double
park on Glenknoll Drive and Larkridge
Drive, where the two parking lots are
located. Double-parked cars create
possible vehicle-pedestrian conflicts.
º Observers witnessed through traffic using
the opposing lane to pass double-parked
cars during dismissal.
º Some students and parents cross in
between traffic on Glenknoll Drive and
Larkridge Drive. Safety would be
improved by adding midblock crossings
directly connecting to Glenknoll
Elementary’s driveways.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have not been any bicycle or pedestrian
collisions within a quarter mile of the school
during the study years.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 6361 Glenknoll Dr., Unincorporated
Orange County, CA 92886
º Grades: TK–6
º 2023 Enrollment: 410
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Glenknoll Elementary School is located in
Unincorporated Orange County. The following
recommendations will need to be
coordinated with Orange County Public Works
for implementation.
Stop sign studies should be conducted for the
intersections of Fairlynn Boulevard/Crestknoll
Drive (where there is an existing crossing
guard), Crestknoll Drive/Glenknoll Drive, and
Larkridge Drive/Glenknoll Drive. The County
will conduct traffic, pedestrian, and bicycle
counts to determine if stop signs and/or a
crossing guard can be warranted for these
intersections. Implementing stop signs at these
locations can create controlled intersections
that are safer for pedestrians to cross to reach
the school.
Implementing a “no left turn” restriction from
the street into the school parking lots on
Larkridge Drive and on Glenknoll Drive during
school hours can reduce conflicts between
vehicles and crossing pedestrians, as well as
minimize vehicles backing up. The County will
work with the Operations and Maintenance
team to install proper signage.
Enforcing intersection daylighting parking
restrictions at the intersections of Fairlynn
Boulevard/Crestknoll Drive, Crestknoll Drive/
Glenknoll Drive, and Larkridge Drive/Glenknoll
Drive can provide drivers, pedestrians, and
cyclists with a better view of the intersections.
School staff is encouraged to contact the
OC Sheriff Department when enforcement is
needed. The County will evaluate if additional
daylighting restrictions are needed.
Active Transportation Plan 95 Recommendations
A high-visibility crosswalk on the east leg and
an ADA-compliant curb ramp at the southwest
corner of Fairlynn Boulevard/ Crestknoll
Drive will bridge gaps between sidewalks
and enhance mobility for people of all ages
and abilities. The County will conduct a
crosswalk study to determine if the crosswalk
is appropriate. The ADA curb ramp will only
be implemented should there be future street
improvements, as-to not alter the existing
residential driveway.
The County will consider adding centerline
striping to Crestknoll Drive to act as traffic
calming.
Cars on Larkridge Drive waiting to enter the school
parking lot
Recommendations 96 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 34. Glenknoll Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations 90 !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Ä90
GOLDEN GATE
NOB HILL
S
TONEHURST
PAL
M
A
LAMP POST
PAL
BRIDLE
AMINO
MOSELLE
RIDGE MANOR
CLEAR RIVER
A
C
A
CIA
WAVERLY GLEN
WOODSTOCK
RIVERVIEW
FAIRLYNN
WINFIELD
KAMEHA
GRACE HAVEN
TANGLEWOOD
ROYAL OAK
GLEN
FAIRMONT
A
C
A
C A HILL I
OAKVALE
KINGSBRIAR
CANYON
WHITE SPRING
GLEN
H
AVEN
HILLSIDE
BROOKMONT
LARKRIDGE
FERNGLEN
OLIVE BRANCH
HILLTOP
CRESTKNOLL
BENTWOOD
LINDAFAIR
AMBERDALE
GLENDALE
IMPERIAL
GLENKNOLL
Kingsbriar
Park
Brookmont
Park
Glenknoll
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Parking Restrictions
! Signage*
! Stop Warrant
Recommendation
Existing Trails
*No Left Turn during
School Hours signage R33
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Glenknoll Elementary
Unincorporated County
Active Transportation Plan 97 Recommendations
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Recommendations 98 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Lakeview Elementary School
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 17510 Lakeview Ave., Yorba Linda, CA
92886
º Grades: TK–5
º 2023 Enrollment: 416
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Upgrading the existing standard crosswalks
at Lakeview Avenue/Valley View Avenue to
high-visibility crosswalks would bridge gaps
between sidewalks and alert drivers that
pedestrians may be in the area.
Rear student loading area on Brooklyn
Avenue
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º The front gate of the school near the busy
intersection of Valley View Avenue and
Lakeview Avenue is currently closed.
º Improved trail connectivity would also help
reduce scaling of fences by students trying
to get to school from trails.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have not been any bicycle or pedestrian
collisions within a quarter mile of the school
during the study years.
Active Transportation Plan 99 Recommendations
Figure 35. Lakeview Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
LOS ANGELES
EDGEWOOD
CLOVERDALE
DENVER
OAK HILL
VALLEY VIEW
HARLAN
DRAKE
BIDWELL
PACIFIC
JEFFREY
ODRA IC R
FREMONT
NO
TLRAC
LAKEVIEW
JENNIFER
LA CONCET
TA
A
M
OL ASAC
RIDGEDALE
BRIARDALE
MARDA
CHESTNUT
2ND
BROOKLYN
CHICAGO
WALNUT
Lakeview
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
! High Visibility Crosswalk
Existing Trails
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Lakeview Elementary
Yorba Linda
VALLEY VIEW
Recommendations 100 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Parents drop off their students on Linda Verde
Street; the loading area is defined by traffic cones
Linda Vista
Elementary
School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Drivers have been observed making illegal
left turns from Linda Verde Street onto Ohio
Street and from Ohio Street onto Linda
Verde Street. Limited visibility of the no-leftturn signs are a possible cause. º Many parents drop off their students in
front of the two gates on Linda Verde
Street. Formalized loading areas near
the gates on Linda Verde Street would
be helpful.
º Some parents drop off their students in
the parking lot of the church across Linda
Verde Street, and their students cross
Linda Verde Street at midblock locations.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision within
a quarter mile of the school on Ohio Street near
the school driveway.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 5600 Ohio St., Yorba Linda, CA 92886
º Grades: TK–5
º 2023 Enrollment: 371
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Sign improvements include upgrading the
existing “no left turn” signs at the intersection
of Ohio Street/Linda Verde Street to make them
more visible, and installing new “no U-turn”
signs to reduce illegal turning movements at
Linda Verde Street where the road widens.
To improve safety for students who access
the school via Linda Verde Street, the Plan
proposes formalizing student loading areas
along Linda Verde Street near the school gate
by adding curb paintings and student loading
zone signs.
Enforcing intersection daylighting parking
restrictions and installing high visibility
crosswalks at the intersection of Linda Verde
Street/Grandview Avenue can provide drivers,
pedestrians, and cyclists with a better view of
the intersection.
Connecting sidewalk gaps on Buena Vista
Avenue from Ohio Street to the OC Loop/El
Cajon Trail can encourage students to walk
and bike to and from school by using the trail.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 101
Figure 36. Linda Vista Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations 90 !
!
!!
BLUEBERRY
VALE
SUNNY SLOPE CT
FORBES
SUNNYVIEW
ARROYO CAJON
ALAMO LN
LAKE SHORE
WHITE OAK
OHIO
LINDA VERDE
KELLOGG
SANDRA
LOOKOUT
TAMARISK
PEBBLE BEACH
SHAMROCK
COUNTRY CLUB
EDGECLIFF
RIDGE
CHERRYLEE
FIRCREST
SHORT
LAKEHAVEN
MOUNTAIN VIEW
BUENA VISTA
IMPERIAL
GRANDVIEW
GRANDVIEW AV EXT
SCENIC VIEW
OHIO
Phillip S. Paxton
Equestrian Center
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation ! Parking Restrictions
! Signage*
Recommendation
Sidewalk Improvements
Traffic Calming
Existing Trails
*Enhance existing No Left Turn R33
and No U-Turn signage R3-4
! High Visibility Crosswalk
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Linda Vista Elementary
Yorba Linda
Recommendations 102 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Mabel M. Paine Elementary School
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends connecting sidewalk
gaps along Plumosa Drive to provide people
with a safer space to travel and reduce conflicts
between pedestrians and moving vehicles.
Enforcing intersection daylighting parking
restrictions at the residential intersections near
the school and the school driveway exits on
Plumosa Drive can provide drivers, pedestrians,
and cyclists with a better view of
the intersections.
Installing an RRFB at Plumosa Drive/Cari Lane,
along with advanced yield signs and highvisibility crosswalks at Plumosa Drive/Piper Place and Plumosa Drive/Cari Lane and the
existing crossing guard, will alert drivers to the
presence of those crossing and prompt them to
slow down.
Figure 37. Mabel M. Paine Elementary School Safe
Routes to School Recommendations There are gaps in the sidewalk network around the school
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Designated walking spaces and crossing
locations on Plumosa Drive are limited.
Additionally, cars are often parked too
close to the intersections surrounding
Mabel M. Paine Elementary, which creates
potential access and sight distance issues.
Connecting sidewalk gaps and enforcing
intersection daylighting could improve
safety in the area.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision
resulting in severe injury within a quarter mile
of the school on Hills Way.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 4444 Plumosa Dr., Yorba Linda,
CA 92886
º Grades: TK–5
º 2023 Enrollment: 373
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 103 ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !!!! ! !!! ! PIPER WEST HILL MAIN GARNER
QUIET MEADOW
WEST TERR
ACE
SOUTHERN POINTE
AVOLIN
D
A
L
ALIC
I
A
OGAN LINDA
BLAZING STAR
ELSIE
GOLDBARK HEADS
TALL
WILD GINGER
SOUTHERN HILLS
SUNNY GARDEN
ARBOR G
ATE
CANYON CAROL
MOLLIE
POPPY
MARK
S
HARON
AVOCADO GROVE
CARI
DEBI
BOEING
ORIE
NTE
IMPERIAL
KAYE
RIO DE ORO
RIO DE P
L
ATA
LORI
LOGAN VIEW
AI CNELAV
SCHOOL
EVORGSURTI C
A
LTRU
D
Y
MAN
DARIN
LAKEVIEW
BAS
TANCHU
R
Y
PLUMOSA
Mabel M. Paine
Elementary
SAFE ROUTETO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
!
Parking Restrictions
!
Pedestrian Beacon
! Signage*
Recommendation
Sidewalk Improvements
Traffic Calming Pedestrian Priority
Zone
ExistingTrails
PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE !
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation !
ADA Ramps
High Visibility Crosswalk
*School Advance Warning
Assembly D signage SW24-3
! High Visibility C
rosswalk
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Mabel M. Paine Elementary
Yorba Linda
Recommendations 104 Yorba Linda-Placentia
A crosswalk crossing Rose Drive in front of
the school
Rose Drive
Elementary
School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Crossing time on Rose Drive was observed
to be too short for the relatively wide road.
Insufficient pedestrian clearance also
creates backup in the parking lot for exiting
cars. Configuring a leading pedestrian
interval and lengthening the interval overall
would help improve clearance.
º Drivers appear to be speeding on Rose
Drive, while there are narrow sidewalks and
a lack of comfortable biking infrastructure.
Further investigation is required to
assesses the impact on street parking
and right-of-way if considering widening
sidewalks with buffer zones and installing
protected bike lanes. These measures
could improve comfort and safety for active
travelers while also providing improved
connectivity to the El Cajon Trail.
º Adding a direct access point from El
Cajon Trail to Rose Drive Elementary could
improve connectivity and encourage more
walking and biking to school. Further
investigation for feasibility is needed.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision and
one bicycle collision within a quarter mile of
the school. Both collisions occurred on
Madison Avenue.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 4700 N Rose Dr., Yorba Linda, CA
92886
º Grades: TK–5
º 2023 Enrollment: 367
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends sidewalk widening
along Rose Drive from Yorba Linda Boulevard
to El Cajon Trail to provide a more comfortable
and safer walking environment for pedestrians.
High-visibility crosswalks and intersection
daylighting are recommended along Rose
Drive at multiple residential intersections to
increase pedestrian visibility and enhance
crossing safety.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 105
Figure 38. Rose Drive Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
!
!
VISTA
VIS
TA RANCH
SAGA
NHAPS
GEM
PRE
N
TISS
CRESTA BELLA
CAMILLE
SHERWOOD VILLAGE CIR
MALCOLM
HERITAGE
HUGGINS
MIMOSA
TSERCNOL
REGULUS
YRUBHSA
LIBERTY
ORANGE
ARIES
NAENAEJ
LIBRA
LARO
VERNA
SPAHN LN
KONA KOVE
CAMILLE PL
PROSPE
C
T
LESA
LAVELL
HILLCREST
PALOMINO
EL CAJON
RANCHO
MEADOWVIEW
YA
WKO
ORB
ROSE
OAKHURST
LOIE
NIGHTINGALE
Rose Drive
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Parking Restrictions
Recommendation Sidewalk Improvements
Existing Trails
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Rose Drive Elementary
Yorba Linda
Recommendations 106 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Travis Ranch School
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends implementing traffic
calming measures, such as speed humps and
speed cushions, along Vía De La Escuela and
Dominguez Ranch Road to slow down traffic.
Further studies will be conducted prior to the
implementation of any traffic
calming measures.
High-visibility crosswalks are proposed along
Vía De La Escuela and Dominguez Ranch
Road at multiple residential streets to bridge
gaps between sidewalks and alert drivers that
pedestrians may be in the area.
Improving trail connections on the west side
of the school will provide safe walking routes
separated from road traffic.
Upgrading the existing standard crosswalks
to high-visibility crosswalks at Dominguez
Ranch Road/Vía De La Escuela can enhance
pedestrian safety at these wide intersections. Walking trails connect Travis Ranch School to Travis Ranch Youth Park
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Speeding appears prevalent on Yorba
Linda Boulevard, Via De La Escuela, and
Dominguez Ranch Road despite significant
student presence and sight distance
limitations due to topography.
Traffic calming measures could mitigate
these issues. Further speed studies
need to be conducted to verify speed
conditions.
º Installing high-visibility wayfinding signs
and paving the unpaved section of the trail
that runs along Dominguez Ranch Road
would provide improved access to the
loading area at Travis Ranch Youth Park.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have not been any bicycle or pedestrian
collisions within a quarter mile of the school
during the study years.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 5200 Vía De La Escuela, Yorba Linda,
CA 92887
º Grades: TK–8
º 2023 Enrollment: 1,227
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 107
Figure 39. Travis Ranch School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
VIA DIANZA
VIA
MARIPOSA
ALLONBY
VIA DEL
PARQUE
VIA DEL GAVILAN
WHITEWATER
WESTFIELD
POTOMAC
VIA ALISA
STONEHAVEN
JOANNE
MACKENZIE
DUNROBIN
CLEARWATER
TODD
FEATHER
CIRCULO NUEVO
VIA DEL CUERVO
CLE SONORA
VIA VICENTE
VIA DE LA ESCUELA
VIA BERNARDO
VIA COTA
ROANOKE
AVENIDA ADOBE
CALLE SONORA
VIA DEL HALCON
PO
RTA
GE
YORBA LIN
DA
Dominguez Trailside Park
Travis Ranch
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! Curb Extension
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Parking Restrictions
Off-street Path Improvements
Existing Trails
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Travis Ranch
Yorba Linda
Recommendations 108 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Van Buren Elementary School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Many students cross midblock at Van
Buren Street and Glasgow Circle.
º During morning arrival, congestion spills
into Van Buren Street from the school’s
parking lot, blocking passing traffic.
º Drivers along Van Buren Street will
maneuver between cars waiting to enter
the parking lot and the sidewalk (Van
Buren Street is one travel lane each
direction). This creates potential conflicts.
º Some drivers were observed making illegal
U-turns on Van Buren Street.
º Some students were dropped off at a
red curb on Van Buren Street. One driver
parked their car at the red curb and walked
their student to the school’s entrance.
º The crossing guard said drivers
speed along Van Buren Street during
free-flow conditions.
º Fire hydrants and utility poles and boxes
create obstructions for pedestrians on Van
Buren Street.
º The frontage road of Van Buren Elementary
falls within Yorba Linda’s jurisdiction.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have not been any bicycle or pedestrian
collisions within a quarter mile of the school
during the study years.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 1245 N Van Buren St., Placentia, CA
92870
º Grades: TK–6
º 2023 Enrollment: 571
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
High-visibility crosswalks are proposed
along Van Buren Street at multiple residential
streets to bridge gaps between sidewalks and
alert drivers that pedestrians may be in the
area. This Plan also recommends upgrading
the existing standard crosswalks to highvisibility crosswalks on all legs at Yorba Linda Boulevard/Van Buren Street.
The segment on the west side of Van Buren
Street from Calgary Avenue to Glasgow Circle
is a no-parking zone during school hours.
Much of this area has red painted curbs except
for a small segment on the west side of Van
Buren Street south of Calgary Avenue. Filling
in this small gap with red curb will further
reinforce the no-parking restriction in front of
the school.
A Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB)
is recommended for the north leg of the
Jefferson Street/Carlsbad Street intersection
to alert drivers to the presence of students and
prompt them to slow down. This RRFB would
be located in the City of Placentia.
Many intersections near the school lack painted
crosswalks
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 109
Figure 40. Van Buren Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Saratoga Park
YORBA LINDA
PLACENTIA
SEQUOIA AVE
TS NOSREFFEJ
CASCADES AVE
RD DNALERO MTSE W LASTERBROOK ST
CUMBERLAND CIR
YORBA LINDA BLVD
TS LOOPRE IV L
LAWNDALE PL WEBB
PL
RD DNALTUR
HILLWOOD DR
DURHAM DR MELBOURNE LN
COVENTRY LN
YORKSHIRE AVE
SAO PAULO AVE
MONTEVIDEO AVE
N JEFFERSON ST
CARLSBAD ST
CASA ORO DR
BRIARHILL DR
VAN BUREN ST
LA COLLETTE PL
HILLWOOD PL
CALGARY AVE
YELLOWSTONE
AVE
MESA VERDE
CIR
BRYCE CIR
ZION AVE
YELLOWSTONE AVE CARLSBAD ST
OLYMPIC AVE
STAFFORD
CIR
GLASGOW
CIR
HILLWOOD DR
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries*
* The frontage road of Van Buren
Elementary falls within Yorba
Linda’s jurisdiction.
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Pedestrian Beacon
Parking Restrictions
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Van Buren Elementary
Yorba Linda
Recommendations 110 Yorba Linda-Placentia
The school parking exits across the bike lane
along Bastanchury Road
Yorba Linda High School
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Upgrading the existing standard crosswalks
to high-visibility crosswalks can enhance
pedestrian safety at Bastanchury Road/
Fairmont Blvd.
A speed feedback sign on Bastanchury
Road between Princeton Place and Fairmont
Boulevard will help prevent speeding on
this route to school, especially for cars
traveling downhill.
The City is in the process of conducting a
study for a new traffic signal at Fairmont
Boulevard/ Avenida Del Rey. If the signal is
warranted, crossing infrastructure can be
considered at this intersection.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Vehicle speeds on Bastanchury Road
appear to be high, creating uncomfortable
biking experience for people who bike on
the existing Class II bike lane.
º Sidewalk widening and shade trees
would improve pedestrian comfort along
Bastanchury Road.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one bicycle collision within
a quarter mile of the school on Bastanchury
Road near the school driveway.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 19900 Bastanchury Rd., Yorba Linda,
CA 92886
º Grades: 9–12
º 2023 Enrollment: 1,697
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 111
Figure 41. Yorba Linda High School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!25
!25
! !
LIVORNO
BAYLOR
BROWN
PRINCETON
CASIANO
VERONA
CORNELL
VILLA BERGAMO
PENN
VILLA
VALENTE
VIA DEL PRADO
SEGOVIA
DUKE
MALAGA
RAVENNA
YALE
BASTANCHURY
GRA
N
A
D
A
VILLA MEDICI
CAMAROSA
VIA DE LAS MONTANAS
AVE DEL REY
AVENIDA DE LAS FLORES
VIA DE LA
A
M
OLAP
FAIRMONT
Gun
Club
Road
Linear Park
Yorba
Linda High
School
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation
! Signage*
!25 Speed Feedback Sign
Existing Trails
! On- Campus Signage**
*School Zone signage SW21-1
** Please Pull Forward signage
! Traffic Signal Warrant
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Yorba Linda High
Yorba Linda
Recommendations 112 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Yorba Linda Middle School
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 4777 Casa Loma Ave., Yorba Linda, CA
92886
º Grades: 6–8
º 2023 Enrollment: 772
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Enhancing the existing crossings at Casa
Loma Avenue/Christie Drive and the existing
midblock crossing at the El Cajon Trail with
ADA-compliant curb ramps and advanced
yield markings will improve accessibility and
safety for pedestrians.
Upgrading the existing standard crosswalks
to high-visibility crosswalks at Casa Loma
Avenue/Imperial Highway (State Route 90) will
alert drivers that pedestrians may be in the
area and enhance connectivity between the
two segments of El Cajon Trail. While many intersections along Casa Loma Avenue do not have marked crosswalks,
students can cross via the high-visibility
crosswalk at Christie Drive
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Casa Loma Avenue currently has just
one crosswalk.
º Improving access to the El Cajon Trail
would enhance connectivity to the school
and to Hurless Barton Park.
º Yorba Linda Boulevard is a heavily
trafficked six-lane road. Pedestrian
comfort at the intersection of Casa Loma
Avenue and Yorba Linda Boulevard could
be enhanced with leading pedestrian
intervals, high-visibility crosswalks, and the
installation of a second crosswalk at the
east end of the intersection crossing Yorba
Linda Boulevard.
º Improved access to the school through
Veterans Sports Park would encourage
more active travel.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision and
one bicycle collision within a quarter mile of
the school on Imperial Highway (State Route
90). The pedestrian collision resulted in a
severe injury.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 113
Figure 42. Yorba Linda Middle School Safe Routes to School Recommendations 90 !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
MONTEREY
IMPERIAL
HEIDE
RICHFIELD
MISTY
TSERCDO
O
W
ORANGE
DEBI
AVOLINDA
WOODHAVEN
WORKING
LADERA
LO
OPRE IV L
OAK LEAF
LEMON
W
OBNI AR
JEAN
JAMESTOWN
JOSHUA
ELMHURST CIR
WISTERIA
SEQUOIA
EUREKA
ACORN
EL CAJON
BATES
PE
ACHTREE
DELANCY
ROCKY POI
N
T
CHRISTIE
SUNWEST CIR
MEADOWVIEW
CASA LO
M
A
LERENE
WIE V
YELLAV
Veterans Park
Yorba
Linda
Middle
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Yield Markings
Recommendation Sidewalk Improvements
Pedestrian Priority Zone
Existing Trails
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Pedestrian Signals
Yorba Linda Middle
Yorba Linda
Recommendations 114 Yorba Linda-Placentia
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 115
Placentia | Safe Routes to School Recommendations
5. El Camino Real Continuation High School
6. El Dorado High School
7. George Key School (campus shared with
Golden Elementary School)
8. Golden Elementary School (campus
shared with George Key School)
9. John O. Tynes Elementary School
10. Kraemer Middle School
11. Melrose Elementary School
This Active Transportation Plan evaluates all 16
Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District
schools in Placentia. The list of the study
schools is as follows.
1. Brookhaven Elementary School
2. Charles Wagner Elementary School
3. Col. J. K. Tuffree Middle School (campus
shared with Parkview School)
4. Parkview School (campus shared with Col.
J. K. Tuffree Middle School)
12. Morse Elementary School
13. Ruby Drive Elementary School
14. Sierra Vista Elementary School
15. Valadez Middle School Academy
16. Valencia High School
The following section presents information
about completed walk audit findings
and collision history near each school.
Recommendations within a quarter mile of
each school are shown on each school’s map.
Recommendations 116 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Long driveways and limited sight distances
present possible vehicle-pedestrian conflicts
Brookhaven Elementary School
º Grades: TK–6
º 2023 Enrollment: 450
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends upgrading the
crosswalk to a raised crosswalk at the existing
midblock crossing in front of the school on
Brookhaven Avenue. This improvement can
increase safety by alerting drivers about the
crossing students and slowing down vehicular
travel speed.
Improving the sidewalk on Brookhaven Avenue
from Bastanchury Road to Brower Avenue and
enhancing driveway crossings can ensure
students arrive at the school safely.
ADA-compliant curb ramps at Bastanchury
Road/Brookhaven Avenue will bridge gaps
between sidewalks and enhance mobility for
people of all ages and abilities, especially
those with disabilities, people with strollers,
and the elderly.
A speed feedback sign on Bastanchury Road
between Kraemer Boulevard and Brookhaven
Avenue will help prevent speeding on this route
to school.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Narrow sidewalks and curb cuts
are present, creating possible
accessibility limitations.
º Speeding appears prevalent along
Bastanchury Road, which includes a single
crossing guard. Further speed studies
need to be conducted to verify speed
conditions.
º Improvement of crossings, including
midblock on Brookhaven Avenue, across
the driveway entrances, and across
Bastanchury Road, offer potential
safety gains.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been five bicycle collisions and
one pedestrian collision within a quarter mile
of the school, one of which resulted in a severe
injury. Most of these collisions occurred on
Bastanchury Road.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 1851 Brookhaven Ave., Placentia, CA
92870
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 117
Figure 43. Brookhaven Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !25
!
!
!
!
! !
!
TS EKONAOR
SWANSON AVE
DVLB RE MEAR
D
K
R NOTSG IN K
SOMERSET DR
GILLILAN ST
WILLAMETTE AVE
LIVINGSTON AVE
PATRICIAN LN
EVA IA CNELAV
TS ES WORP
TS DEE WT
TS ORODOET
E BASTANCHURY RD
BROWER AVE
SARAH AVE
E BORROMEO AVE
HUDSON AVE
ALLEGHENY AVE
FEATHER AVE
BROOKHAVEN AVE
El Dorado
High
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Raised Crosswalk
Speed Feedback Sign
Sidewalk Improvements
!25
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Brookhaven Elementary
Placentia
Recommendations 118 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Charles Wagner
Elementary
School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Replacing the RRFB at the intersection of
Yorba Linda Boulevard and Kilt Avenue
with a dedicated traffic signal could
improve crossing safety given high
pedestrian volumes. A signal warrant
analysis shall be conducted as the
next step.
º Parents stop and park on Yorba Linda
Boulevard and walk their kids to school.
Traffic calming on Yorba Linda Boulevard
would make this safer.
º Many students access the school through
Wagner Park on the north side of the
school. Adding designated student loading
areas and paved walking paths would
make this more comfortable.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one bicycle collision within a
quarter mile of the school near the intersection
of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Kilt Avenue.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 717 E Yorba Linda Blvd., Placentia, CA
92870
º Grades: TK–6
º 2023 Enrollment: 399
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
The school has two access points, one
on Yorba Linda Boulevard and one on
Trumpet Avenue.
To improve safety for students who access the
school via Yorba Linda Boulevard, this Plan
proposes a traffic light at the intersection of
Yorba Linda Boulevard/Kilt Avenue to reduce
conflict between pedestrians and high-speed
motor vehicles on Yorba Linda Boulevard.
ADA-compliant curb ramps at Yorba Linda
Boulevard/Kilt Avenue will bridge gaps
between sidewalks and enhance mobility for
people of all ages and abilities.
A safety mirror on the northeast corner of
Yorba Linda Boulevard/Kilt Avenue can help
pedestrians spot vehicles pulling out of the
school’s driveway ahead of time.
High-visibility crosswalk with rectangular rapid
flashing beacons in front of the entrance to the
school
The segment on Yorba Linda Boulevard from
the school’s driveway to Seville Street is a noparking zone; the City could consider painting the curb red to reinforce this rule more clearly.
To improve safety for students who access the
school via Trumpet Avenue, this Plan proposes
student loading areas along Trumpet Avenue
near the school gate.
Installing high-visibility crosswalks on the west
and south legs at Trumpet Avenue/Seville
Street and installing advance yield markings
at Trumpet Avenue/Shaw Circle and Trumpet
Avenue/Cartlen Drive can make crossing feel
more comfortable for pedestrians.
ADA-compliant curb ramps at Trumpet
Avenue/Cartlen Drive will bridge gaps between
sidewalks and enhance mobility for people of
all ages and abilities.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 119
Figure 44. Charles Wagner Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
Wagner
Elementary
HEMINGWAY AVE
KINGSWOOD DR
SHERWOOD VILLAGE C RI
OTT AVE
CUYLER AVE
HA
MER LN
NL KCA
MROCC M
SKYMEADOW DR
HEATHER AVE
TS TREBNAS
APPLING AVE
HIGHLANDER AVE
Wagner Park
TRUMPET
AVE
TENNYSON AVE
ALCOTT AVE
YORBA LINDA BLVD
SHADY LN
LAWN AVE
MOSS CIR TABAH LN
SHADBURN AVE
STEINBECK ST
CARTLEN DR
HAMER DR
SEVILLE ST
ANDERSON ST
VALENCIA AVE
El Dorado
High
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Safety Mirror
! School Entrance
!
! Yield Markings
Parking Restrictions
Traffic Light
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Wagner Elementary
Placentia
Recommendations 120 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Col. J. K.
Tuffree Middle
School and
Parkview
School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
Col. J. K. Tuffree Middle School and Parkview
School are adjacent to each other, so the
walk audits for the two schools were
conducted together.
º Speeding appears prevalent along
Kraemer Boulevard, and participants
expressed concerns that drivers ignore
school signage.
º Drivers turning right onto Patrician Lane
from Kraemer Boulevard have been
observed doing so at a high rate of speed
and failing to yield to pedestrians. Further
speed studies need to be conducted to
verify speed conditions.
º The school lacks dedicated school bus
loading zones, and buses have been
observed parking within the bike lane on
Kraemer Boulevard in front of Parkview
School during morning arrival.
º Congestion at Tuffree Middle School’s
parking lot creates queuing along Kraemer
Boulevard during arrival.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one bicycle accident within a
quarter mile of Col. J. K. Tuffree Middle School
at Tuffree Boulevard and San Carlos Way.
There have been two pedestrian collisions
within a quarter mile of Parkview School at
the intersection of Kraemer Boulevard and
Golden Avenue.
COL. J. K. TUFFREE SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 2151 N Kraemer Blvd., Placentia, CA
92870
º Grades: 7–8
º 2023 Enrollment: 637
PARKVIEW SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 2189 N Kraemer Blvd., Placentia, CA
92870
º Grades: TK–12 (Home School)
º 2023 Enrollment: 476
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Expanding the existing median to occupy the
former left-turn slip lane at Kraemer Boulevard/
Morning arrival congestion spills into Kraemer
Boulevard
Bus parked in the bike lane on Kraemer Boulevard
Patrician Lane would increase the safety of the
existing pedestrian refuge island.
Extending the existing red curb on Kraemer
Boulevard toward the north, covering the rest
of the school property will prevent people
parking cars along the curb in bike lanes.
Installing a crosswalk on the east leg of
Kraemer Boulevard/Bagnall Drive can close
the gap between sidewalks.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 121
Figure 45. Col. J. K. Tuffree Middle School and Parkview School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !25
!
!
!
!
!
!
Tuffree
Middle
YA
WNES IP
KOCH AVE
GOLDEN AVE
BASTANCHURY RD
BAGNALL AVE
BEAL AVE
EVA KCOH
N KRAEMER BLVD
SAN REMO AVE
BELFORD AVE
SANTA ANITA AVE
LORETO PL
TUFFREE BLVD
FREDERICK ST
SANTA ROSA WAY
BAGNALL DR
BLANQUITA WAY
GARFIELD AVE
PATRICIAN LN
SAN LUIS WAY
W BORROMEO AVE
JUANITA WAY
FLEMING AVE
SAN CARLOS WAY
SOMEREST DR
Brookhaven
Elementary
Tri-City Park
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
Parkview
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Pedestrian Refuge Island
Speed Feedback Sign
Parking Restrictions
!25
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Tuffree Middle/Parkview
Placentia
Recommendations 122 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Orangethorpe Avenue is a major thoroughfare and
traffic route
El Camino Real Continuation High School
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 1351 E Orangethorpe Ave., Placentia,
CA 92870
º Grades: 9–12 (Continuation)
º 2023 Enrollment: 138
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Pedestrian-scale lighting at the OrangethorpeJefferson bus stops will improve safety for students who take transit.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Orangethorpe Avenue is a busy
thoroughfare with high posted speed limits.
Driver disregard of the 25-mph school
zone signage appears prevalent.
º Pedestrian obstructions were observed at
the west leg of Orangethorpe Avenue and
Jefferson Street where a train crossing
signal obstructs space for pedestrians
waiting to cross the street.
º The principal stated they would like
a greater police presence for traffic
enforcement purposes.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one bicycle collision within a
quarter mile of the school near Orangethorpe
Avenue and Jefferson Street.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 123
Figure 46. El Camino Real Continuation High School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
D
RAFT
WAY
ZEHNER WAY
HOLCOMB PL
CAMPANIS LN
ISMAIL PL
ORCHARD RD
ORANGETHORPE AVE
COLLARD RD
LUKE LN
RIVERA PL
CASTNER DR BELFI LN LP ELREBO TUSTIN
AVE
CH
S JEFFERSON ST
ERRY
ST
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
Sidewalk Improvements
!
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
El Camino Real Continuation High
Placentia
Recommendations 124 Yorba Linda-Placentia
El Dorado High School
school. The two pedestrian collisions occurred
near the intersection of Valencia Avenue/Yorba
Linda Boulevard, and the bicycle collision
occurred on Valencia Avenue near
Holmes Avenue.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 1651 Valencia Ave., Placentia, CA 92870
º Grades: 9–12
º 2023 Enrollment: 2,004
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan proposes new high-visibility
crosswalks and student crossing signs on
the south and west legs at Brookhaven
Avenue/Swanee Avenue for students who
access the school through the back gate on
Brookhaven Avenue.
ADA-compliant curb ramps on the northwest,
southeast, and southwest corners at
Brookhaven Avenue/Swanee Avenue will
bridge gaps between sidewalks and enhance
mobility for people of all ages and abilities.
Speeding appears prevalent along Valencia
Avenue, further speed studies need to be
conducted to verify speed conditions.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Speeding in school zones while students
are present appears prevalent at arterial
roads surrounding El Dorado High
including Valencia Avenue, Bastanchury
Road, and Yorba Linda Boulevard. Further
speed studies need to be conducted to
verify speed conditions.
º Students were observed biking on
sidewalks on Valencia Avenue and
Yorba Linda Boulevard where safe bike
infrastructure is lacking.
º The pedestrian crossing time at Shady
Lane and Valencia Avenue is 18 seconds.
Extending pedestrian crossing time and
enforcing a leading pedestrian interval can
enhance crossing safety.
º Some parents pick up their students at
the back gate on the west side of the
campus, so there should be consideration
of potential improvements along
Brookhaven Avenue.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been two pedestrian collisions and
one bicycle collision within a quarter mile of the
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 125
Figure 47. El Dorado High School Safe Routes to School Recommendations ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
El Dorado
High
HEMINGWAY AVE
BLVD
YORBA LINDA
CLE DE CORONADO
RIO GRANDE AVE
VIA DE LEON
TS EUGOR
HEATHER AVE
HIGHLANDER AVE
BROOKHAVEN AVE
VALENCIA AVE
SEVILLE ST
BROWER AVE
SHADY LN
LAWN AVE
HOLMES AVE
TRUMPET AVE
TAHOE AVE
GEETING PLJONES PL
KELLEHER PL
BROWERWOODS PL
MACINNES PL
Wagner Park
Brookhaven
Elementary
Wagner
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
Recommendation !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
ADA Ramps
High Visibility Crosswalk
Pedestrian Beacon
Raised Crosswalk
Safety Mirror
School Entrance
Yield Markings
Sidewalk Improvements
Parking Restrictions
Traffic Calming
Traffic Light
RECOMMENDATIONS
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
El Dorado High
Placentia
Recommendations 126 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Cars queuing in the middle of Golden Avenue for
dismissal
Major arterial midblock crossing on Valencia
Avenue at George J. Koch Park
George
Key School
and Golden
Elementary
School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
George Key School and Golden Elementary
School are adjacent to each other, so the
walk audits for the two schools were
conducted together.
º Vehicles queue on Golden Avenue as
parents wait in line, including parking and
waiting in the bike lane.
º Schools encourage parents to use George
J. Koch Park or the back neighborhood
entrances for arrival and dismissal as an
alternative to the main arrival/dismissal
point on Golden Avenue.
º Valencia Avenue is a major street with
difficult crossings and narrow sidewalks.
Traffic calming would be useful.
º A midblock crossing, such as an RRFB
or pedestrian hybrid beacon with a highvisibility crosswalk and refuge island, would be useful on Golden Avenue
where students cross the street among
waiting cars.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision and
one bicycle collision within a quarter mile of the
schools at the intersection of Valencia Avenue/
Golden Avenue.
GEORGE KEY SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 710 Golden Ave., Placentia, CA 92870
º Grades: TK–12 (Special Education)
º 2023 Enrollment: 128
GOLDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DETAILS
º School Address
" 740 Golden Ave., Placentia, CA 92870
º Grades: TK–6
º 2023 Enrollment: 763
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends that the school increase
access points by adding entrances at the end
of Heloise Way and at Royal Steward in George
J. Koch Park. Additionally, a sign should be
installed at the end of Mignon Way to indicate
a school entrance. Having multiple entrances
can reduce the necessity for detours, thereby
increasing students’ willingness to walk and
bike to school.
Installing stop signs for east-west traffic
approaching the existing midblock crossing
on Golden Avenue in front of the school
can reduce conflicts between pedestrians
and vehicles.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 127
Figure 48. Golden Elementary School and George Key School Safe Routes to School Recommendations ! !
!
!
!
Ä90
GREENLEAF DR
EARNSHA
W DR
DATE ST
CARINA AVE
VALENCIA AVE
ELM ST
MATHEWSON AVE
EVA RONYART
OAKHAVEN AVE
RD RE M
AH
GOLDEN AVE
LEMKE DR
CHICAGO AVE
ELM ST
VALENCIA AVE
CARTLEN DRMCCORMACK LN
HELOISE WAY
MIGNON WAY
CARTLEN DR
ROYAL STEWART DR
George J Koch Park
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
! Pedestrian Beacon
! School Entrance
!Signage*
*School Entrance Welcome Sign
RECOMMENDATIONS
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Golden Elementary/George Key
Placentia
Recommendations 128 Yorba Linda-Placentia
John O. Tynes
Elementary
School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Traffic conflicts are visible at Central
Avenue and Stanford Drive—drivers form
two right turn lanes and two left-turn lanes
turning from Central Avenue onto Stanford
Drive (both single lane streets).
º Parents waiting or parking on Stanford
Drive to pick up their children create
traffic congestion and potential vehiclepedestrian conflicts. Intersection daylighting and raised midblock crossings
will improve crossing safety.
º Some parents ignore traffic rules such as
prohibitions on left turns from Stanford
Drive into the school’s parking lot, as well
as performing illegal U-turns at Central
Avenue and Stanford Drive. Improving
sign visibility and increasing enforcement
presence may be helpful.
º Some parents pick up their children exiting
from the back gate at Richard Samp Park.
A formalized loading area near
the park may provide more safe and
orderly loading.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been three pedestrian collisions
within a quarter mile of the school, one of
which occurred at the intersection of Chapman
Avenue and Mission Way, resulting in a
severe injury.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 735 Stanford Dr., Placentia, CA 92870
º Grades: TK–6
º 2023 Enrollment: 752
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends traffic calming features,
such as speed humps and speed cushions,
along Stanford Drive from Central Avenue to
Dartmouth Way to slow down traffic.
High-visibility crosswalks at Stanford Road/
Dartmouth Way and at Stanford Road/Central
Avenue will alert drivers that pedestrians may
be in the area.
ADA-compliant curb ramps at Stanford Road/
Dartmouth Way will bridge gaps between
sidewalks and enhance mobility for people of
all ages and abilities.
Implementing intersection daylighting parking
restrictions on the north and west legs of
Central Avenue/Stanford Drive will provide
drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists a better view
of the intersection.
Parents park along Stanford Drive to pick up their
children
Installing a short center median (such as on
Lyons Way and De Jesus Drive) on Stanford
Drive near the school entrance will prevent
double right turns and double left turns from
Central Avenue onto Stanford Drive, and illegal
U-turns on Stanford Drive.
A safety mirror on the southwest corner of
Central Avenue/Stanford Drive can help
pedestrians spot vehicles pulling out of
Stanford Drive ahead of time.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 129
Figure 49. John O. Tynes Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
! ! !
Tynes
Elementary
ALTA VISTA ST
ALL AM
ERICA
WY
LILAC
DR
HIBISCUS
WAY
JAS
MIN
E
CIR
CHAPMAN AVE
SAN ANSELMO
LN
SAN JUAN LN
GARDENIA AVE
STANFORD DR
DE JESUS DR
DARTMOUTH DR
FORDHAM DR
LOYOLA DR
VANDERBILT DR
COLGATE DR LANGER DR
LYONS WAY
N CENTRAL AVE
MISSION WAY
SAN CLEMENTE LN
Richard
Samp
Park
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Parking Restrictions
! Safety Mirror
Parking Restrictions
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Tynes Elementary
Placentia
Recommendations 130 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Kraemer Middle School and Valencia High School
addressing these issues. If possible,
sidewalks should be widened or buffered
to provide a more comfortable walking
space.
º Bradford Avenue, Madison Avenue, and
Chapman Avenue lack safe biking space.
Madison Avenue and Chapman Avenue
have high speeds and would benefit from
protected bike lanes. On the other hand,
Bradford Avenue is narrow, and it may
be challenging to fit bike lanes without
removing parking lanes.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been seven pedestrian collisions
and three bicycle collisions within a quarter
mile of the school. One of the pedestrian
collisions, which occurred at the intersection of
Bradford Avenue and Ruby Drive, resulted in a
severe injury.
Vehicle driving in the opposing lane on Alta Vista
Drive
KRAEMER MIDDLE SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 645 N Angelina Dr., Placentia, CA 92870
º Grades: 7–8
º 2023 Enrollment: 1,028
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Lane markings on Alta Vista Street leading
to Kraemer Middle’s driveway are complex
with the potential to create conflict.
Consider updated markings to minimize
confusion and compliance issues.
º Some parents wait for their students at the
parking lot near Kraemer Middle’s baseball
field and along Angelina Drive. If possible,
a formalized loading area near the baseball
field parking lot would be helpful.
º Students and parents cross at midblock
locations on Angelina Drive. Consider
adding midblock crossing elements such
as RRFBs, high-visibility crosswalks, and
raised medians.
º Speeding issues were observed on roads
surrounding Valencia High, including
Bradford Avenue, Madison Avenue, and
Chapman Avenue. Further speed studies
need to be conducted to verify speed
conditions. Moreover, drivers block
visibility at intersections on Bradford
Avenue, and sidewalks on Madison Avenue
are narrow and inconsistent. Connecting
sidewalk gaps would be helpful in
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 131
VALENCIA HIGH SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 500 Bradford Ave., Placentia, CA 92870
º Grades: 9–12
º 2023 Enrollment: 2,628
Narrow sidewalk and no bike lane on Madison
Avenue
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Installing delineators along Alta Vista Street in
front of the school would prevent drivers from
driving onto opposite traffic lanes.
Installing high-visibility crosswalks on the west
and north legs at Angelina Drive/Gilbert Way
will alert drivers that pedestrians may be in
the area.
Installing pedestrian signals, such as
signalized crossings or Pedestrian Hybrid
Beacons (PHBs) on Bradford Avenue at
Primrose Avenue and Ruby Drive can alert
drivers to the presence of students and prompt
them to slow down.
Installing a high-visibility crosswalk on the west
leg at Bradford Avenue/Ruby Drive will alert
drivers that pedestrians may be in the area.
ADA-compliant curb ramps are proposed at
multiple intersections near the school along
Bradford Avenue to bridge gaps between
sidewalks and enhance mobility for people of
all ages and abilities.
Recommendations 132 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 50. Kraemer Middle School and Valencia High School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Kraemer
Memorial
Park
BRADFORD
AVE
N ANGELINA DR
PAGEANTRY DR
WILSON AVE
LAVEN
D
ER
LN
MELROSE
ST
KRAEMER BLVD
ORCHID DR
ALTA VISTA ST
PRIMROSE AVE
RUBY DR
JADE AVE
ANNED DR
ORANGE GROVE AVE
TURF DR
BRETING WAY
HANNAH WAY
E MADISON AVE
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Pedestrian Beacon
! Stop Warrant
! Yield Markings
Sidewalk Improvements
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Kraemer Middle/Valencia High
Placentia
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 133 Page 657 of 1177 Recommendations 134 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Melrose Elementary School
and Valadez Middle School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
Melrose Elementary and Valadez Middle
School are adjacent to each other, so the
walk audits for the two schools were
conducted together.
º Speeding appears prevalent on Melrose
Street and La Jolla Street near the
school. Further speed studies need to be
conducted to verify speed conditions.
º Congestion in the parking lot of Melrose
Elementary spills into La Jolla Street during
morning arrival.
º A crossing guard reported concerns
with speeding traffic and failure to obey
crossing guard commands.
º The designated school bus area for
Valadez Middle School is located next to
the high-visibility crosswalk and RRFB at
La Jolla Street and Segovia Circle. When
buses are parked, it is difficult to see cars
coming from the east.
º Students were observed crossing La Jolla
Students walking to school must cross Melrose
Street at La Jolla Street, a large and busy
intersection
MELROSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 974 S Melrose St., Placentia, CA 92870
º Grades: TK–5
º 2023 Enrollment: 463
Street midblock after being dropped off on
the south side of the street.
º Some drivers were observed performing
illegal U-turns on La Jolla Street.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been six pedestrian collisions and
six bicycle collisions within a quarter mile of the
school. Two of the bicycle collisions, both of
which occurred along Melrose Street, resulted
in severe injuries. Additionally, one of the
pedestrian collisions, which occurred at
a midblock location on Melrose Street right
in front of the school, also resulted in a
severe injury.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 135
Parked buses obstruct views of oncoming vehicles
near the crosswalk
VALADEZ MIDDLE SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 161 E La Jolla St., Placentia, CA 92870
º Grades: 6–8
º 2023 Enrollment: 700
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends sidewalk widening
along Melrose Street from Orangethorpe
Avenue to La Jolla Street to provide a more
comfortable and safer walking environment
for pedestrians.
ADA-compliant curb ramps and highvisibility crosswalks are proposed at multiple intersections near the school to bridge gaps
between sidewalks and enhance mobility for
people of all ages and abilities.
Installing a speed feedback sign and 25-mph
school zone signage on La Jolla Street near
the school can inform drivers of the presence
of students and prompt them to slow down.
This Plan suggests moving the bus zone
farther away from the crosswalk at La Jolla
Street/Segovia Circle, as it currently obstructs
the view of westbound traffic.
Installing a speed feedback sign and 25-mph
school zone signage on La Jolla St near the
school can inform drivers of the presence of
students and prompt them to slow down.
Recommendations 136 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Figure 51. Melrose Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations 57 !
!25
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
Ä57
Valadez
Middle
School Academy
MELROSE ST
ORANGETHORPE AVE
MIRALOMA AVE
RED
GUM
ST
E LA JOLLA ST
E VIA MARTENS
ORTEGA WAY
SEGOVIA CIR
S MELROSE ST
TAFOLLA ST
McFadden Park
Melrose
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Signage*
Recommendation Speed Feedback Sign
Sidewalk Improvements
Pedestrian Priority Zone
*School Zone signage SW24-1
!25
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Valadez Middle School Academy/
Melrose Elementary
Placentia
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 137 Page 661 of 1177 Recommendations 138 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Morse Elementary School
Curb ramps do not exist at the Morse Avenue/
Cypress Point Drive intersection
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Implementing parking restrictions near this
crossing can improve visibility for drivers,
pedestrians, and cyclists, thereby reducing
conflicts between different modes of travel.
ADA-compliant curb ramps and highvisibility crosswalks are proposed at multiple intersections along Morse Avenue near the
school to bridge gaps between sidewalks
and enhance mobility for people of all ages
and abilities.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Students would benefit from a safer
crossing on Morse Avenue. This can be
achieved by adding midblock crossings
with traffic control, installing ADAcompliant curb ramps, and enforcing intersection daylighting.
º Speeding issues are sometimes observed
on Morse Avenue, which can be improved
by adding traffic calming features. Further
speed studies need to be conducted to
verify speed conditions.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision and
one bicycle collision within a quarter mile on
Morse Avenue in front of the school.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 431 Morse Ave., Placentia, CA 92870
º Grades: TK–6
º 2023 Enrollment: 374
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 139
Figure 52. Morse Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations ! !
!!
!
!
!
!
Bradford
Park
LIMERICK
DR
YORBA LINDA BLVD
EVA IA CNELAV
KRAEMER BLVD
CLE DE CORONADO
VACA
AVENIDA DE
PAGEANTRY DR
DOVER
WAY
ROCKAWAY DR
PALM DR
VIA DE LEON
VIA CORTEZ
CARNATION DR
CANDLEWOOD AVE
PINEHURST ST
NOTTINGHAM
WAY
EAGLE DR
ATHENS
AVE
EL
DORADO
ST
FAIRWAY LN
MORSE AVE
BARRY PL
TANGIER AVE
ROBBIE PL
NORMANDY AVE
E PALM DR
HILLCREST AVE
ST ANDREWS AVE
CYPRESS POINT DR
N ANGELINA DR
ORLEANS DR
VALENCIA AVE
CHERRY HILLS DR
ORLEANS DR
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Stop Warrant
Recommendation Sidewalk Improvements
Parking Restrictions
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Morse Elementary
Placentia
Recommendations 140 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Most crossings in the neighborhood lack painted
crosswalks
Ruby Drive Elementary School
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 601 Ruby Dr., Placentia, CA 92870
º Grades: TK–6
º 2023 Enrollment: 356
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
High-visibility crosswalks are proposed at
multiple intersections along Ruby Drive near
the school to alert drivers that pedestrians may
be in the area.
A stop sign study should be conducted
for the east-west traffic on Ruby Drive at
Diamond Road. This can create an all-way
stop-controlled intersection, making it safer for
pedestrians to cross and reach the school.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º The school crossing guard stated many
drivers speed along Ruby Drive and
through the stop signs at Ruby Drive and
Twilight Street.
º Afternoon dismissal congestion spills
into Ruby Drive from the front parking lot,
blocking the crosswalks at Ruby Drive and
Twilight Street. High-visibility crosswalks
could reduce conflicts.
º Some drivers stop in the middle of
Ruby Drive to drop off their students.
Conspicuous signage and enforcement
presence can reduce issues.
º Some students cross Ruby Drive midblock
to get to Ruby Drive Elementary. Consider
midblock crossing improvements such as
RRFBs and raised medians.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision and
one bicycle collision within a quarter mile of the
school on Madison Avenue.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 141
Figure 53. Ruby Drive Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
PLACENTIA
AVE
QUARTZ LN
TIGER LN
RUBY DR
STARDUST
ST
MADISON AVE
SUNRISE ST
HARMONY LN
DEERPARK DR
ORCHID DR
SHEREE LN
RUBY DR
MOONBEAM ST
STARDUST DR
BRADFORD AVE
DIANE AVE
AQUAMARINE ST
DIAMOND RD
TWILIGHT ST
TWILIGHT
LN
DIAMOND RD
PRIMROSE AVE
SUNRISE ST
JADE AVE
W MADISON AVE
DIAMOND RD
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Pedestrian Beacon
! Stop Warrant
! Yield Markings
Sidewalk Improvements
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Ruby Drive Elementary
Placentia
Recommendations 142 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Sierra Vista Elementary School
Class IIB buffered bike lane on Bastanchury Road,
on the north side of Sierra Vista Elementary
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
º Some vehicles appeared to be speeding
on Placentia Avenue. Further speed
studies need to be conducted to verify
speed conditions.
º One person (not a student) was observed
crossing Placentia Avenue midblock to get
to the shopping center across from Sierra
Vista Elementary.
º Placentia Avenue and Bastanchury Road
is a large and busy intersection. A crossing
guard is posted here, but few students
crossed at this intersection. The crossing
guard said the area is overall safe for
students who walk.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been two pedestrian collisions and
three bicycle collisions within a quarter mile of
the school.
SCHOOL DETAILS
º School Address
" 1811 N Placentia Ave., Placentia, CA
92870
º Grades: TK–6
º 2023 Enrollment: 482
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Striping “Keep Clear” markings on the
southbound lanes of Placentia Avenue in front
of the school driveway entrance will prevent
drivers attempting to enter the lot from blocking
the road.
Improving pedestrian-scale lighting on
Placentia Avenue from Bastanchury Road to
Lewis Place can enhance walking safety during
times with limited natural light.
Upgrading the existing standard crosswalks to
high-visibility crosswalks at Placentia Avenue/
Lewis Place will alert drivers that pedestrians
may be in the area. High-visibility crosswalks
are also proposed along Placentia Avenue
at multiple residential streets to bridge gaps
between sidewalks.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 143
Figure 54. Sierra Vista Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Sierra
Vista
Elementary
ARMSTRONG DR
YA
WNES IP
SHERWOOD AVE
LIVINGSTON AVE
NENNO AVE
MYSTIC AVE
EVA NRUBEARB
HARTFORD RD
DR DROFDEB
EVA EG ID RB M
AC
WINCHESTER ST
LP NROHT
FLEMING AVE
RUMSEY PL
LP MELAS
EVA KCOH
EVA YEL NATS
DR DRANAC
W BASTANCHURY RD
MYSTIC AVE
WHITTEN WAY
BARKER WAY
JOAN WAY
LEE PL LEWIS PL
PALM DR
ST JOHN
WAY
LORI WAY
ROSPAW WAY
WOODEN DR
NELL CIR
N PLACENTIA AVE
VIRGINIA PLST JAMES PL
MIDDLESEX PL
GILMAN CIR
George
Key
Ranch
Historic
Park
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
! ADA Ramps
! High Visibility Crosswalk
! Keep Clear Marking
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Sierra Vista Elementary
Placentia
Recommendations 144 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Non-Infrastructure Program Recommendations
Non-infrastructure programming complements
the recommended infrastructure in this Plan
by providing opportunities for community
members to learn about the benefits of walking
and biking and by encouraging community
members to use active transportation to
replace driving trips. Successful programs
typically follow a five Es approach, adapted
from the League of American Bicyclists.
Equity
Programming should be available and accessible for all community members in Yorba Linda and Placentia, particularly in disadvantaged communities.
Engineering
Programming should support the implementation of active transportation infrastructure.
Education
Programming should educate community members about the benefits of using active transportation. Educational programming should also teach community members how to use existing walking and biking facilities in the city, and how all road users should share the road.
Encouragement
Programming should encourage walking and biking in the city through celebrations, group activities, and special events.
Evaluation
Programming should include metrics that evaluate the levels of walking and biking in the city to compare data before and after the implementation of a program or infrastructure improvement.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 145
The following section describes existing and
recommended programming in the cities of
Yorba Linda and Placentia and in the Orange
County region. While the Cities should lead
the implementation of these recommended
programs, this can also be an opportunity for
City staff to work with local nonprofits, schools,
neighborhood groups, and
jurisdiction partners.
Existing Programs
Yorba Linda Senior Mobility
Program/TRAILS (Equity)
The City of Yorba Linda, in partnership with the
Orange County Transportation Authority and
California Yellow Cab, offers an affordable,
door-to-door transportation service for seniors
aged 60 and older. This wheelchair-accessible
service covers destinations within Yorba Linda
and extends up to 5 miles outside the city.
Available daily, including holidays, rides can be
scheduled between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.
Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA) Bicyclist and
Pedestrian Education (Education)
The OCTA Safe Travels Education Program
(STEP) provides school-based skills and
traffic safety instruction that can be conducted
during PE or an after-school program. STEP
emphasizes development of pedestrian and
bicycle traffic safety skills, bike handling skills,
safe riding practices (“street smarts”), helmet fit,
and bike prep.
Orange County Bicycle Coalition
(Education, Encouragement)
Orange County Bicycle Coalition is a nonprofit committed to creating a bikeable Orange County. Commuting and recreational bicyclists
formed the Orange County Bicycle Coalition in
1991 to promote bicycling as an everyday means
of transportation and recreation. The coalition
facilitates classes and campaigns to educate
cyclists on maintenance and road safety. The
organization also provides resources to help
plan group rides and updates on changes to
bicycle routes throughout the county.
Recommended Programs
Demonstration Projects
(Engineering, Evaluation)
Demonstration projects are temporary, shortterm, low-cost roadway projects that are used to test, evaluate, and refine potential changes
to the street before investing in long-term
solutions. They use inexpensive materials
such as paint and flexible bollards to try
things like median refuge islands, protected
bike lanes, and more. People can try out
the demonstration and provide feedback to
each city, which can be considered before
permanent installation. Demonstration
projects can also build support for permanent
infrastructure and can encourage residents
to advocate for safer pedestrian and
bicycle infrastructure in their communities.
Demonstration projects can be installed
for as short as a few hours, or as long as a
few weeks.
Quick-Build Projects (Engineering,
Evaluation)
Quick- build projects are installed quickly
with low-cost materials. Unlike demonstration
projects, quick-build projects are intended to
be long-term installations. Quick-build projects
Recommendations 146 Yorba Linda-Placentia
provide active transportation improvements
to communities on shorter timelines than
traditional construction. Because of the lowcost materials, quick-build projects allow for flexibility, and can be modified after installation
to better fit the needs of the community. Quickbuild projects can last years, allowing Yorba Linda and Placentia to collect ample resident
feedback before constructing the improvement
with more permanent materials.
Safe Routes for Seniors (Equity,
Engineering, Encouragement,
Education, Evaluation)
Safe Routes for Seniors programs can provide
active opportunities for older adults in Yorba
Linda and Placentia to foster healthy aging
and longer years of independent living. The
Safe Routes for Seniors project is based on
the Safe Routes to School model, a highly
replicable model that pioneered the approach
of bringing together stakeholders, finding out
their needs, and creating useful maps based
on findings. The program develops tools and
services to help seniors find ways to meet
their transportation needs through trips that
primarily include walking and transit, both
by bus or rail. Developing programs that
include group walks geared toward seniors
will also encourage social bonding. The
program can include key awareness topics
such as education for drivers to pay particular
attention to senior pedestrians and specific
improvements such as increasing crossing
time in areas that experience a high number
of seniors walking. Feedback received from
the program can inform future infrastructure
improvements that further address the needs
of older adults.
Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) - Go Human
Campaign (Encouragement)
Go Human is a community engagement
program with the goals of reducing traffic
collisions in Southern California and
encouraging people to walk and bike more.
At the center of Go Human is a regional safety
advertisement campaign, which encourages
drivers to slow down and watch for people
walking and biking and reminds all road users
to abide by local laws and to be courteous to
other users. Campaign materials can include
posters, bus shelter ads, banners, yard signs,
spoke cards, and more.
Bike Rack Sponsorship Program
Encouragement (Engineering)
To help meet the demand for short-term
bicycle parking, the Cities can develop a bike
rack sponsorship program where a donor
purchases a bike rack for their community,
and a dedication plaque is personalized with a
message or logo from the donor. The location
of the bicycle rack is agreed upon by the
donor and the Cities. In addition to the cost of
the bicycle rack and dedication plaque, the
donor pays for the associated installation and
maintenance costs.
Transportation Demand Management
(Encouragement)
Transportation demand management strategies
can help Yorba Linda and Placentia reach their
active transportation goals by incentivizing
businesses that encourage walking and biking,
and by disincentivizing driving by limiting
parking, implementing rideshare systems,
creating active transportation campaigns, and
providing active transportation options.
Open Streets Events
(Encouragement, Education)
Open streets events temporarily close streets
to motor vehicle travel and open them to all
active transportation travel. These events are
free to the public and typically span multiple
cities. Activities include community booths,
music, and bicycle safety and education
opportunities. Open streets events encourage
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 147
community members to experience their
streets in new ways and can build support
for more active transportation infrastructure
in a community. Open streets events are also
an excellent opportunity to install temporary
demonstration projects and to collect feedback
from community members.
Bicycle and Public Transit Tours
(Encouragement)
Bicycle and public transit tours can promote
local and regional tourism to the area. Potential
themes include a focus on businesses and
festivals, coordination with major events,
recreational road cycling, and history.
Bicycle Friendly Businesses
(Encouragement)
Awarded by the League of American
Bicyclists, bicycle-friendly businesses are
recognized for their efforts in encouraging
employees to bike to work. Employers may
offer incentives such as bicycle equipment
subsidies, bicycle commuter tax benefits, and
guaranteed ride home programs. Employers
can also encourage bicycling by participating
in bike-to-work days and bicycle events in
the community, offering shared bicycles
for employees, providing bicycle parking,
showers, and repair tools, and inviting
instructors to teach employees safe
bicycling skills. Yorba Linda and Placentia
should encourage local businesses to
implement these incentives and apply for
the award. The Cities should also apply for
Bicycle Friendly Community status once
this Active Transportation Plan has been
sufficiently implemented.
Active Transportation Counts
(Evaluation)
Pedestrian and bicyclist counts can help
identify travel patterns for active transportation
users and can track the usage of new active
transportation infrastructure. Counts should
be conducted at intersections or street
corridors prior to the implementation of
new infrastructure, and then again after the
implementation of the infrastructure. These
counts will help the cities of Yorba Linda
and Placentia understand how future active
transportation infrastructure can best serve
the community, and the types of programming
that may benefit pedestrians and bicyclists in
the community.
Bike Voucher Programs (Equity,
Encouragement)
Bike voucher programs can be enacted in
different ways. For disadvantaged communities
in Yorba Linda and Placentia, the Cities can
offer vouchers to qualifying residents to
purchase a new bicycle or to offset the cost
of a new bicycle. The Cities may also choose
to offer incentives for residents that forego car
ownership in exchange for bicycle vouchers.
Residents that do not own a motor vehicle can
apply for the incentive, and in exchange, the
City can provide the resident with a voucher
to purchase a new bicycle or to maintain an
existing bicycle. These vouchers can help
create a more equitable transportation network
by ensuring all residents in Yorba Linda and
Placentia have access to an efficient mode of
transportation, and by reducing the number of
motor vehicles on the road.
Impaired Driving Campaign
(Education)
Over half of the fatal and serious injury crashes
studied in Yorba Linda and Placentia involved
one or more impaired road users. The Cities
can work with health advocates, local law
enforcement and state agencies, and local
businesses such as bars and restaurants, to
promote sober road use through established or
new educational activities.
Recommendations 148 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Safe Routes
to School Programs
International Walk to School Day
(Encouragement)
International Walk to School Day is an
opportunity for schools to highlight the many
benefits of walking and promote pedestrian
safety for students. The event is observed
each year on the first Wednesday in October.
The observance creates awareness and
inspires local action on creating a safer and
environmentally sustainable environment.
School Crossing Guard Training
Education (Engineering)
School crossing guards play an integral role in
fostering a safe and comfortable environment
for students walking and bicycling to school.
Training is an essential step to help ensure
that crossing guards are performing properly
and safely. Crossing guards can help create
gaps in traffic on busy neighborhood collector
roads, remind drivers of the presence of
people walking, instill safe walking skills in
students and their families, and indicate when
people driving should yield. The California
Active Transportation Resource Center provides
trainer courses at no cost to help jurisdictions
and law enforcement with guidance on how to
train and vet potential new and existing
crossing guards.
BP/AR 5142.2 – Safe Routes to School
Program (Encouragement)
Encourage the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified
School District to adopt the California School
Board Association’s sample board and
administrative regulations BP/AR 5142.2 –
Safe Routes to School Program. Including
Safe Routes to School language in a school
board policy can be an important first step
toward supporting these activities in schools
throughout the district.
Contests and Challenges
(Encouragement)
Students track walking and biking trips to
school toward some kind of goal or reward.
Trips can be tallied for individuals, classrooms,
grades, or school-wide. Track trips using punch
cards, tally sheets, or an app toward individual
or group rewards.
Park-and-Walk (Encouragement)
School buses and caregivers drop students
at an established location a few blocks from
school where students are greeted by school
staff or other volunteers and supervised
on their walk to school. Park-and-walk
programs can also follow a dispersed model
using nearby neighborhood streets for arrival
and dismissal.
Safe Routes to School Campaign
(Encouragement)
Safe Routes to School Campaigns are meant
to educate parents, neighbors, and others
to drive slowly and attentively, and watch out
for students walking and biking near schools.
Campaigns may use a range of strategies
to share messaging including yard signs,
banners, school communications, and more.
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations 149
School Communications
(Encouragement)
Promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving
behavior and encourage families to walk and
bike to school through school communication
channels such as newsletters, social
media, websites, and in-person events.
Communications can include customized,
high-resolution graphics and messaging
ready to share through electronic platforms
or in print.
Student Safety Patrol (Engagement,
Encouragement)
Student volunteers from upper elementary,
middle, and junior high school can complete
a traffic safety training and learn to direct
children to safely cross vehicle traffic on
and adjacent to campus. Typically, patrols
are appointed by a teacher or principal with
parent approval.
Suggested Routes to School Maps
(Education, Encouragement)
Customized maps can show suggested
walking (and biking for older students) routes
to school along with key information including
crossing guard locations, signalized or stopcontrolled intersections, approximate route times, key landmarks, and more.
Walk/Bike Field Trips
(Encouragement)
Students travel to a field trip destination on foot
or by bike, or the field trip could be the walk
or bike itself. Possible destinations could be
nearby parks or natural areas, city hall, a fire
department, museum, library, theater,
and more.
Walking School Bus
(Encouragement)
A walking school bus is a safe and fun way
for students to travel to and from school with
adult supervision. Each “bus” walks along a
set route with one or more adults leading it,
picking students up at designated stops along
a predetermined route and walking them to
school. A walking school bus is a great way to
address concerns about stranger danger.
Safe Routes to School Workshops
(Evaluation)
These 30- to 60-minute workshops can be
held for parents, guardians, school staff, city
engineers and planners, law enforcement,
and other Safe Routes to School partners.
Workshop goals and activities can vary, and
may include identifying issues, brainstorming
opportunities, sharing information and
resources, and more.
Facilities Improvements
(Engineering)
Promote community health by developing
opportunities for physical activity such as
creating parks space, walking paths, and
greening of existing routes to school.
Implementation 06
Implementation 152 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Introduction
This chapter describes the considerations
that the Yorba Linda and Placentia must make
prior to implementing this Plan’s recommended
bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Each
recommendation was prioritized based on
a set of criteria and ranked based on the
prioritization scores. These scores help
organize all the recommendations into a
list highlighting projects that should be a
priority for funding and implementation. The
prioritization methodology is described in
detail later in this chapter.
Cost estimates are provided for each
recommendation type, and funding
source options are described that can
be used for designing and constructing
the recommendations. Maintenance is an
important factor in implementing infrastructure,
and this chapter describes existing
mechanisms for maintaining facilities for
people walking and biking.
Non-infrastructure programming can help
residents realize the full potential of the
active transportation network in each city
by educating and encouraging residents to
walk or bike. This chapter also includes a list
of existing and proposed programs to make
walking and biking fun and safe.
Planning level cost estimates are shown in
Table 6 and Table 7. These cost estimates
are based on construction costs for similar
projects in other jurisdictions and do not fully
account for all of the design and engineering
work that will need to be completed prior to
implementation. Due to the varying typology of
the cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia, these
estimates may vary significantly from the final
implementation costs. Costs can also change
due to inflation, or if projects are implemented
in conjunction with other road improvements
or construction projects. These cost estimates
represent the most frequently recommended
projects in this Plan. There are some unique
recommended projects that will require further
study by the Cities to determine their cost
estimates. Future studies will determine the
final cost estimate of each project prior to its
implementation.
Planning Level
Cost Estimates
Active Transportation Plan Implementation 153
Facility Type Unit Costs Quantity/Mileage Summary Cost Estimate Class I Shared-Use Path $1,620,000 2.0 Miles $3,240,000 Class II Bike Lane $143,000 1.2 Miles $165,531
Class IIB Buffered Bike Lane $152,000 5.4 Miles $820,800 Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard $619,000 7.2 Miles $4,456,800 Class IV Separated Bikeway $1,190,000 8.5 Miles $10,115,000 Curb Ramps $7,500 152 $1,140,000
High Visibility Crosswalks $6,000 118 $708,000
Median Refuge Islands $54,000 7 $378,000
Pedestrian Lighting $281,000 1 $140,500
Pedestrian Signal Head $54,000 13 $702,000
Raised Crosswalk $17,000 1 $17,000
RRFB $65,000 2 $130,000
Signage $1,000 7 $7,000
Signal Warrant $17,000 4 $68,000
Speed Feedback sign $16,000 6 $96,000
Stop Warrant $6,000 4 $24,000
Total $22,208,631
Table 6. Placentia Cost Estimates
Implementation 154 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Facility Type Unit Costs Quantity/Mileage Summary Cost Estimate Class I Shared-Use Path $1,620,000 .4 Miles $648,000
Class II Bike Lane $143,000 8.3 Miles $1,186,900
Class IIB Buffered Bike Lane $152,000 4.5 Miles $684,000 Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard $619,000 11.4 Miles $7,056,600 Curb Ramps $7,500 61 $457,500
High Visibility Crosswalks $6,000 107 $642,000
Pedestrian Signal Head $54,000 4 $216,000
Raised Crosswalk $17,000 1 $17,000
Signage $1,000 14 $14,000
Signal Warrant $17,000 1 $17,000
Speed Feedback sign $16,000 4 $64,000
Stop Warrant $6,000 12 $72,000
Total $11,075,000
Table 7. Yorba Linda Cost Estimates
Active Transportation Plan Implementation 155
Prioritization
Yorba Linda Prioritization
Process
Pedestrian Prioritization
As Yorba Linda does not have any stateidentified disadvantaged communities, the City of Yorba Linda selected a pedestrian
priority zone in Main Street Yorba Linda
that is prioritized for constructing
pedestrian improvements.
Bicycle Prioritization
Yorba Linda bicycle projects are prioritized
using three tiers:
º Tier 1 – Projects that the City can most
easily implement, typically consisting of
lower-cost materials and requiring minimal
changes to current roadway operations
or parking.
º Tier 2 – Projects that are more challenging
to implement but address community
safety and bikeway connectivity concerns,
typically connecting to community
destinations, closing gaps in the bikeway
network, and connecting bicyclists across
jurisdictions. Projects along roadways with
a history of collisions and projects that
travel through Main Street Yorba Linda are
included in Tier 2.
º Tier 3 – Projects that connect to fewer
destinations and are less crucial in
creating a citywide bikeway network, and
bikeways that received fewer supporting
community comments or require significant
funding or roadway reconstruction.
Prioritizing projects helps the cities of Yorba
Linda and Placentia identify projects that
will best provide a safe, comfortable, and
connected active transportation experience
for residents and visitors. The process for
prioritizing recommendations was tailored
to each city and each city’s recommended
infrastructure types.
Implementation 156 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Placentia
Prioritization Process
Pedestrian Prioritization
Recommendations within the two
disadvantaged communities in the City of
Placentia, as identified by CalEnviroScreen 4.0,
are prioritized for implementation.
Bicycle Prioritization
Like Yorba Linda projects, bicycle projects in
Placentia are prioritized using three tiers:
º Tier 1 – Projects that the City can most
easily implement, typically consisting of
lower-cost materials and requiring minimal
changes to current roadway operations or
parking.
º Tier 2 – Projects that are more challenging
to implement but address community
safety and bikeway connectivity concerns,
typically connecting to community
destinations, closing gaps in the bikeway
network, and connecting bicyclists across
jurisdictions. Projects along roadways with
a history of collisions and projects that
travel through Placentia’s disadvantaged
communities are included in Tier 2.
º Tier 3 – Projects that connect to fewer
destinations and are less crucial in
creating a citywide bikeway network, and
bikeways that received fewer supporting
community comments or require significant
funding or roadway reconstruction.
Prioritization Results
Each bicycle recommendation was prioritized
based on the criteria above. The results of this
process are in Table 8 and Table 9.
Active Transportation Plan Implementation 157
Table 8. Yorba Linda Bicycle Infrastructure Prioritization Tiers Street From Street To Street Class Prioritization Tier
Casa Loma Ave Bastanchury Rd Yorba Linda Blvd IIIB 1
Dominguez Ranch Rd Yorba Ranch Rd Yorba Ranch Rd IIIB 1 Eastpark Dr Oakcrest Cir Savi Ranch Pkwy IIIB 1
Eastpark Dr Old Canal Rd Oakcrest Cir II 1
Lakeview Ave Yorba Linda Blvd Shady Knl IIB 1
Lemon Dr Imperial Hwy Lakeview Ave IIIB 1
Old Canal Rd Yorba Linda Blvd Savi Ranch Pkwy II 1
Palm St Dead End Yorba Linda Blvd IIIB 1
Paseo De La Cumbre Paseo Del Brado Yorba Ranch Rd IIIB 1 Paseo De Las Palomas Fairmont Blvd Village Center Dr IIB 1 Paseo Del Prado Travis Rd Esperanza Rd II 1
Plumosa Dr Bastanchury Rd Lemon Dr IIIB 1
San Antonio Rd Casino Ridge Rd Yorba Linda Blvd IIIB 1
Savi Ranch Pkwy Old Canal Rd E Savi Ranch Pkwy II 1
E Savi Ranch Pkwy Savi Ranch Pkwy Eastpark IIIB 1
Valley View Ave Lakeview Ave Valley View Ave II 1
Vista Del Mar Valley Center Valley Center IIIB 1
Wabash Ave Rose Dr Valley View Circle IIIB 1
Ave Barcelona Dead End Esperanza Rd IIIB 2
Buena Vista Ave Richfield Rd Lakeview Ave IIB 2
El Cajon Ave Prospect Ave Valley View Ave IIIB 2
Esperanza Rd Fairmont Blvd Yorba Linda Blvd IIB 2
Eureka Ave Bastanchury Rd Yorba Linda Blvd IIIB 2
Fairmont Blvd* Village Center Dr Paseo de Las Palomas II 2
Implementation 158 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Fairmont Blvd* Paseo de Las Palomas S City Limit II 2
Lakeview Ave Bastanchury Dr Oriente Dr IIIB 2
Lakeview Ave Lemon Dr Yorba Linda Blvd IIB 2
Mariposa Ave Dead End Lakeview Ave IIIB 2
Oriente Dr Lakeview Ave Palm St IIIB 2
Paseo Del Prado Paseo De Las Palomas Travis Rd IIB 2
Rose Drive* Bastanchury Rd S City Limit II 2
Bastanchury Rd Fairmont Blvd Village Center Dr IIB 3
Paseo De Toronto Avenida del Tren Camino De Bryant IIIB 3 Paseo De Las Palomas Yorba Linda Blvd Vista Del Mar IIB 3 Rose Dr* Wabash Ave Bastanchury Rd II 3
Valley View Ave* Brooklyn Ave Bastanchury Rd II 3
Valley View Ave Lakeview Ave Bastanchury Rd II 3
Weir Canyon Rd North City Limit Savi Ranch Pkwy I 3
Savi Ranch Pkwy/ Mirage St Yorba Linda Blvd Old Canal Rd I 3 *Class II recommendation may be buffered where unconstrained by street parking or right-of-way (ROW)
Active Transportation Plan Implementation 159
Table 9. Placentia Bicycle Infrastructure Prioritization Tiers Street From Street To Street Class Prioritization Tier
Angelina Neighborhood Bicycle Blvd Kraemer Blvd Bradford Ave IIIB 1 Bastanchury Rd W City Limit E City Limit IIB 1
Bradford Ave N City Limit Santa Fe St IIIB 1
Central Ave Alta Vista St Chapman Ave IIB 1
La Jolla St W City Limit Bridge IIIB 1
La Jolla St Ave De Pio Pico W City Limit IV 1
Livingston Ave Placentia Ave Kraemer Blvd IIIB 1
Madison Ave Bradford Ave Kraemer Blvd II 1
McCormack Neighborhood Bicycle Blvd Valencia Ave Golden Ave IIIB 1 Melrose St Chapman Ave Railroad IIIB 1
Morse Neighborhood Bicycle Blvd Bradford Ave Alta Vista St IIIB 1 Rose Dr N City Limit S City Limit IIB 1
Tuffree Park Tuffree Park Bastanchury Rd IIIB 1
Alta Vista St Kraemer Blvd E City Limit IIB 2
Chapman Ave Kraemer Blvd Orangethorpe Ave IV 2
Chapman Ave W City Limit Kraemer Blvd II 2
Kraemer Blvd Bastanchury Rd Chapman Ave IV 2
Magnolia Neighborhood Bicycle Blvd Kraemer Blvd Central Ave IIIB 2 Palm St Yorba Linda Blvd Rose Dr IV 2
Santa Fe St Placentia Ave Murray St IV 2
Kraemer Blvd N City Limit Bastanchury Rd IV 2
Yorba Linda Blvd W City Limit E City Limit IV 2
Carbon Canyon Creek/Flood Control Channel N City Limit Parque Del Arroyo Verde I 3 Melrose St Railroad S City Limit IV 3
Valencia Ave N City Limit E Palm Dr IV 3
Implementation 160 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Maintenance
on each street to determine the best and most
efficient maintenance strategy for long-term
asphalt preservation.
Placentia
The City of Placentia has a Pavement
Management Plan that is updated biennially.
The plan manages the preservation,
rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved
roads by analyzing pavement life cycles,
assessing overall system performance costs,
and determining alternative strategies and
costs necessary to improve the City’s paved
roads. Roads in Placentia are scheduled
for resurfacing based on the Pavement
Management Plan and StreetSaver software.
Each roadway receives a pavement condition
index score, and the roadways are prioritized
for paving based on their scores. California’s
Senate Bill 1 and the City of Placentia’s
Measure U fund the pavement plan.
Both Cities should ensure that repaved
roadways also receive proper maintenance for
their bicycle facilities. Road repaving is also an
excellent opportunity to include new bike lane
striping on a roadway.
Public Works Requests
Yorba Linda
The City of Yorba Linda’s MyCivic 311 app
allows residents to request repairs throughout
the city. Users can request repairs for issues
such as potholes, missing street signs, and
more. Requests can also be submitted via
the MyCivic 311 web portal (https://www.
yorbalindaca.gov/828/MyCivic-311-WebPortal).
Placentia
The iPlacentia mobile app enables residents
to report issues such as road maintenance,
potholes, and street light outages, among
several other options. Using an interactive
map, respondents can drop a pin in the area
that has a maintenance issue and provide a
description. Reports are automatically routed
to the relevant City department for review. A
web version is also available via the “How Do
I?” portal on the City’s website (https://www.
placentia.org/9/How-Do-I).
Maintaining the pedestrian and bicycle
improvements in Yorba Linda and Placentia
is crucial to ensure the function and longevity
of a safe and effective active transportation
network. Debris, potholes, vegetation, and
trash on paths are common concerns among
residents as unmaintained bikeways and
sidewalks can be uncomfortable to use.
The following section describes existing
practices in both cities for maintaining
active transportation infrastructure and
recommended programs each city can
implement to potentially increase walking and
biking for transportation.
City Pavement Plans
Yorba Linda
Funded by the State of California’s Senate Bill
1, the City of Yorba Linda conducts the Annual
Pavement Preservation Project every year.
The project uses a Pavement Management
Program, which allows for the planning and
programming of street maintenance strategies
throughout the City’s roadway network. The
program is updated on a biennial basis
through efforts that include field inspections
Active Transportation Plan Implementation 161
Sidewalk Repair
and Maintenance
Yorba Linda
Residents can report hazardous sidewalks
(those that pose a danger to pedestrians or
fail to meet ADA guidelines, including if the
sidewalk is warped, displaced, or has large
cracks), curbs, and gutters via the City’s
MyCivic 311 app. The service request will be
forwarded to the Public Works Department
who will investigate the damage to determine if
repairs are required and when repairs will
be made.
Placentia
Generally, property owners are responsible
for maintaining the parkway adjacent to their
property. This includes repairing sidewalks and
trimming vegetation. However, if a sidewalk is
hazardous due to tree or root growth from Cityowned and controlled trees or if the affected sidewalk is over 40 years old, the adjacent
property owner is not obligated to share in
the cost of repair. When property owners are
deemed responsible for repair, the Public
Works Department will instruct them of their
requirement to complete and return a sidewalk
repair agreement or seek a licensed contractor
to complete the necessary work as required
within the time span allowed.
Residents can report hazardous sidewalks via
the City’s iPlacentia app.
Street Lighting
Yorba Linda
For most streets in Yorba Linda, street lighting
is managed by Southern California Edison.
Residents can report streetlights that are
burned out, flickering, or staying on during
the daytime to the Southern California Edison
Outage Center (https://www.sce.com/outagecenter/report-street-light-outage). Street lights on Imperial Highway (State Route 90), Via
Nietos, and Via Santa Ana are City-owned and
maintained. Residents can report issues via
the City’s MyCivic 311 app.
Placentia
Most streetlights in Placentia are maintained
by Southern California Edison. Residents
can report streetlight issues via the Southern
California Edison Outage Center (https://www.
sce.com/outage-center/report-street-lightoutage). Streetlights mounted above traffic signal lights are owned and maintained by
the City of Placentia. Residents can report
City-owned streetlight issues via the City’s
iPlacentia app.
Street Sweeping
Yorba Linda
Street sweeping is provided by the Yorba
Linda’s Public Works Department. Arterial
highways are swept regularly in Yorba Linda,
and residential streets are swept every other
week. Residents can consult Map Yorba Linda
(https://webgis.yorbalindaca.gov/portal/
home/) to view street sweeping schedules.
Placentia
The City of Placentia contracts with a thirdparty service for street sweeping. Street sweeping is conducted every other week.
Residents can see street sweeping schedules
via the Public Works Department’s website
(https://www.placentia.org/854/StreetSweeping).
Implementation 162 Yorba Linda-Placentia
Funding Sources
Federal and State
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
(ATP)
The ATP was created to encourage the use of
active transportation through encouragement
and safety measures. Eligible projects
include infrastructure projects, education,
encouragement, and enforcement of noninfrastructure projects which further the goals of the ATP, a combination of infrastructure
and non-infrastructure activities, and the
development of active transportation plans
in disadvantaged communities. Senate Bill 1
(SB 1) stipulates that $100 million of revenues
from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Account will be available annually to the ATP.
The ATP consolidates existing federal and
state transportation programs, including the
Transportation Alternatives Program, Bicycle
Transportation Account, and State Safe Route
to School, into a single program with a focus
to make California a national leader in active
transportation. Applications are typically
submitted in June.
Typical projects funded by the ATP include:
º Safe Routes to School programming
º Safe Routes to Transit programming
º New or improved bicycle infrastructure,
including bike lanes and bike parking
º New or improved pedestrian facilities
including sidewalks, and crosswalks
º Network links to trails and parks
º Educational and encourage programming
º The goals of the ATP are defined as the
following:
" Increase the proportion of walking and
biking trips
" Increase safety and mobility for nonmotorized users
" Reduce greenhouse gas emissions
" Enhance public health
" Ensure disadvantaged communities
share the benefits of the program
Active Transportation Program (ATP) | CTC
(ca.gov)
Affordable Housing and Sustainable
Communities Program (AHSC). The goals of
AHSC are to support compact development
in order to preserve land, reduce greenhouse
gas emissions, and increase the supply
of affordable housing near jobs, stores,
transit, and other key destinations. Eligible
projects include sustainable transportation
infrastructure, such as new transit vehicles,
sidewalks, and bike lanes; transportationrelated amenities, such as bus shelters, benches, or shade trees; and other programs
that encourage residents to walk, bike, and
use public transit. Affordable Housing and
Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program
| California Department of Housing and
Community Development
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION LOCAL PARTNERSHIP
PROGRAM (LPP)
This program provides $200 million in funding
for local and regional transportation agencies
with voter-approved taxes, tolls, or fees,
which are dedicated solely to transportation
improvements. The program provides funding
Active Transportation Plan Implementation 163
for aging infrastructure, road conditions, active
transportation, transit and rail, and health and
safety benefits. The LPP funds are distributed
through a 40% statewide competitive
component and a 60% formulaic component.
Local Partnership Program | CTC
CALTRANS SUSTAINABLE
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANTS
The Sustainable Transportation Planning
Grant Program supports transportation
planning processes that address local and
regional transportation needs and issues. The
program offers two types of grants: Strategic
Partnerships and Sustainable Communities.
The Sustainable Communities Grants has
$29.5 million in funding to encourage local
and regional planning that furthers state
greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. The
Strategic Partnership Grant has $4.5 million
to identify and address statewide or regional
deficiencies on the State highway system in
partnership with Caltrans. The overarching
objectives to guide grant applications are
sustainability, preservation, accessibility,
safety, innovation, economy, health, and social
equity. Past awarded project types include
active transportation, Complete Streets,
transit, safe routes, Vision Zero, and emission
reduction. Sustainable Transportation
Planning Grants | Caltrans
CARBON REDUCTION PROGRAM
Authorized with the BIL in 2022, the Carbon
Reduction Program is a DOT program that
funds projects that support a reduction in
transportation emissions. Eligible projects
include bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure
and public transit facilities. Caltrans distributes
funding based on population sizes using the
2020 Census. Carbon Reduction Program |
US Department of Transportation
CLEAN MOBILITY OPTIONS
Administered by the California Air Resources
Board, the Clean Mobility Options grant funds
projects like bike share, scooter share, car
share, electric vehicle charging stations,
infrastructure for clean mobility, and community
transportation needs assessments. Funds are
available for disadvantaged communities in the
state. Home - Clean Mobility Options
CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR
QUALITY (CMAQ) IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
The annual CMAQ program provides funding
to State DOTs, MPOs, and transit agencies to
invest in projects that reduce emissions from
transportation-related sources and improve air
quality. CMAQ - Air Quality - Environment -
FHWA (dot.gov)
HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM (HSIP)
Administered by Caltrans, the HSIP is offered
every one to two years. The program’s purpose
is to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries
on public roads. Projects on any publiclyowned road or active transportation facility are eligible, including bicycle and pedestrian
improvements. HSIP focuses on projects
that explicitly address documented safety
challenges through proven countermeasures,
are implementation-ready, and demonstrate
cost-effectiveness. Highway Safety
Improvement Program (HSIP) | FHWA (dot.
gov)
Implementation 164 Yorba Linda-Placentia
HOUSE TRANSPORTATION &
INFRASTRUCTURE (T&I) COMMITTEE
APPROPRIATIONS
The House T&I Committee invites Members
of Congress to request funding for projects in
their communities. Project funds can be used
for planning, final design, and construction
projects. Eligible projects include bicycle &
pedestrian infrastructure projects that
increase access, strengthen multimodal
connections, reduce greenhouse gas
emissions, and enhance environmental justice.
Contact the offices of the 40th and 45th
Congressional districts.
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS
– GRANTS FOR ART PROJECTS
Grants for Arts Projects provides expansive
funding opportunities to strengthen the
nation’s arts and culture ecosystem. Through
project-based funding, the program supports
opportunities for public engagement with the
arts and arts education, the integration of the
arts with strategies promoting the health and
well-being of people and communities, and
for the improvement of overall capacity and
capabilities within the arts sector. This funding
source could be used for incorporating public
art into a streetscape redesign or adding
thoughtful art elements that are representative
of the local community. GRANTS FOR ARTS
PROJECTS | National Endowment for the Arts
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANTS
The California Office of Traffic Safety has
grant programs that fund projects that
protect bicyclist and pedestrian safety,
raise awareness about traffic rules, and
provide training and programs for high-risk
communities like children and older adults.
Grants | Office of Traffic Safety (ca.gov)
PILOT PROGRAM FOR TRANSITORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLANNING This program’s goal is to improve America’s
public transportation system by providing
funds to integrate land use and transportation
planning. Funding is available for projects
that improve multimodal transportation,
accessibility, and pedestrian and bicycle
access to transit and enable mixed-use
development near transit. Pilot Program for
Transit-Oriented Development Planning –
Section 20005(b) | FTA (dot.gov)
RAISE GRANTS
Previously known as the BUILD and TIGER
grant, the RAISE grant funds the building and
repair of transportation networks. Available
through the U.S. Department of Transportation,
the RAISE grant allows sponsors at the
State and local levels to obtain funding for
multimodal, multi-jurisdictional projects that
are more difficult to support through traditional
funding initiatives. Rebuilding American
Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity
(RAISE) | US Department of Transportation
RECONNECTING COMMUNITIES PILOT
(RCP)GRANT PROGRAM
Implemented by the US Department of
Transportation, the RCP program focuses
on improving access to daily needs such as
jobs, education, healthcare, food, nature, and
recreation, and foster equitable development
and restoration, and provide technical
assistance to further these goals. Funding for
this fiscal year is a combined allocation of FY
2024, 2025, and 2026. Up to $607 million is
available for planning, capital construction,
and technical assistance. The funding will be
implemented as appropriate and consistent
with the priorities in Executive Order 14052.
Reconnecting Communities Pilot Grant
Program | US Department of Transportation
Active Transportation Plan Implementation 165
SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL
(SS4A)
Established by the Bipartisan Infrastructure
Law (BIL), this program funds initiatives that
prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries
and can be used to carry out items in support
of creating safety Action Plans like Vision
Zero, and in implementing infrastructure
including installing pedestrian and bicycle
networks, transforming roadway corridors into
Complete Streets, and improving the safety
of intersections. Up to $1 billion is available
each year of the program. Safe Streets and
Roads for All (SS4A) Grant Program | US
Department of Transportation
STATE HIGHWAY OPERATION AND
PROTECTION PROGRAM (SHOPP)
The SHOPP program is designed to maintain
the state highway system, however it includes
opportunities to address Complete Streets
elements and improve pedestrian and bicycle
facilities. Program funds can be used for
projects with Complete Streets components
like signage, bike parking, bike lanes,
pedestrian crossing infrastructure, transit
stop improvements, and pedestrian lighting.
Funds can also be used for projects that have
climate action efforts and provide low emission
transportation choices. SHOPP projects are
administered by Caltrans and the California
Transportation Commission. rebuildingca.
ca.gov/state-highway-operation-protection/
STATE OF CALIFORNIA INFILL
INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAM
(IIG)
The objective of the IIG program is to promote
infill housing development by providing
financial assistance for Capital Improvement
Projects that are an integral part of, or
necessary to facilitate the development of
affordable and mixed income housing.
Eligible costs include, but are not limited to,
the creation, development, or rehabilitation
of Parks or Open Space; water, sewer or
other utility service improvements (including
internet and electric vehicle infrastructure);
streets; roads; Transit Station Structured
Parking; transit linkages or facilities; facilities
that support pedestrian or bicycle transit;
traffic mitigation, sidewalk, or streetscape
improvements; Factory-Built Housing
components; Adaptive Reuse; and site
preparation or demolition. Infill Infrastructure
Grant Program | California Department of
Housing and Community Development
STATE TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STIP)
The STIP is a multi-year capital improvement
program of transportation projects on and
off the State Highway System, funded with
revenues from the Transportation Investment
Fund and other funding sources. Funding
consists of two components: Caltrans’
Interregional Transportation Improvement
Program (ITIP) and regional transportation
planning agencies’ Regional Transportation
Improvement Program (RTIP). Pedestrian and
bicycle projects may be programmed under
ITIP and RTIP. STIP programming occurs every
two years. In 2022, STIP added additional
funding for active transportation improvements.
State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP) | Caltrans
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BLOCK
GRANTS
Extended by the BIL, these grants are used
to fund projects that maintain and improve
the transportation performance of federalaid highways, bridges, and tunnels, install pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and
implement transit capital projects. Additional
Transportation Alternatives set aside funds for
active transportation, and active transportation
Implementation 166 Yorba Linda-Placentia
access to transit improvements. STBG -
Federal-aid Programs - Federal-aid Programs
and Special Funding - Federal Highway
Administration (dot.gov)
TRANSFORMATIVE CLIMATE
COMMUNITIES (TCC)
The California Strategic Growth Council funds
community-led development and infrastructure
projects that achieve major environmental,
health, and economic benefits in California’s
most disadvantaged communities. In addition
to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the
goals of the TCC program are to fund projects
which maximize community health and
environmental benefits, avoid displacement,
have comprehensive community involvement,
and offer technical assistance. Previous
rounds have had $115 million available to use
for implementation and planning projects.
Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) -
Strategic Growth Council (ca.gov)
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT
FUNDS (TDA)
TDA provides funding from State Transit
Assistance and Local Transportation Fund.
This program funds a variety of transportation
programs including for pedestrians, bicyclists,
and transit facilities. The amount of funding
is based on sales tax collected in each
county. This fund is administered by Caltrans.
Transportation Development Act | Caltrans
URBAN GREENING GRANT PROGRAM
The Urban Greening Program, funded by the
General Fund, is a grant program designed to
promote a comprehensive, long-term approach
to addressing climate change to improve the
environment. Specifically, the program funds
urban greening and urban forestry projects
that reduce greenhouse gas emissions
and provide multiple additional benefits. A
competitive project will maximize opportunities
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through
project design and implementation as well
as incorporate green infrastructure solutions
that improve the sustainability and function of
existing urban hardscapes and landscapes.
Urban Greening (ca.gov)
Local and Regional
ARTERIAL PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
(APM)
The APM program, administered by OCTA,
provides funding for pavement maintenance
and reconstruction. Strategically coordinated
pavement improvements provide an
opportunity to integrate active transportation
striping projects on streets in a cost effective
manner. Additionally, the inclusion of an
existing or new on-street bikeway in a
project yields more points on the APM grant
application. APMFAQ.pdf (octa.net)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(CIP)
Capital Improvement Programs identify
infrastructure projects in a jurisdiction and
forecast budget and timeline information.
OCPW has a 7-year CIP cycle which includes
OCPW projects, OC Parks projects and OC
Libraries projects. The current CIP is active
until 2029 and includes OC Loop bicycle
projects. Projects identified in this Plan may be
eligible to be considered for the next CIP cycle.
Capital Improvement Program | OC Public
Works: Orange County California
Active Transportation Plan Implementation 167
COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION
FUNDING PROGRAM (CTFP)
The CTFP is a collection of grant programs
which fund projects related to street safety
improvements, traffic and pedestrian safety
near schools, and transit improvements
including extensions and stops. The CTFP
streamlines the grant application process
by providing uniform guidelines for multiple
funding programs. Measure M2 provides
funding for many of the programs in the CTFP.
2024 CTFP Guidelines (octa.net)
OCTA MEASURE 2
Measure M2, also known as OC Go, is
a half-cent sales tax for transportation
improvements in Orange County through
2041. Jurisdictions can apply for this grant to
fund transit improvements and programs, and
street pavement improvement projects. OCTA
administers the funding, and the Measure
M Taxpayer Oversight Committee upholds
the integrity of the funds to ensure it is spent
on voter-approved transportation projects.
Environmental Cleanup Program Tier 2 Call
for Projects - Orange County Transportation
Authority (octa.net)
SCAG LOCAL COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT AND SAFETY MINIGRANT
This mini-grant program is intended to increase
the safety of those most harmed by traffic
injuries and fatalities. Grants are awarded
to community organizations, nonprofits, and
social enterprises with a focus on organizations
that include members of disadvantaged or
underinvested communities. Mini-grants fund
projects which educate mobility users on safe
practices, increase access to safe routes for
users, and envision safety improvements to
transportation infrastructure that prioritizes
vulnerable users. Example projects include
safety demonstration projects, community
events, and safety campaigns. SCAG’s Go
Human Awards 28 Safety Mini-Grants Across
the Region - Southern California Association
of Governments
SCAG SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
PROGRAM (SCP)
SCAG’s Sustainable Communities Program
has provided resources and assistance to
jurisdictions to complete local planning efforts.
The SCP provides resources to support
active transportation and multimodal efforts
and sustainability, equity in transportation
planning, smart cities, and mobility innovations,
reductions in motorized vehicle miles traveled,
and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
The SCP also supports quick-build projects,
and network visioning to help jurisdictions
install active transportation networks. Awards
of up to $500,000 are available for active
transportation-focused plans. Sustainable
Communities Program - Southern California
Association of Governments
Appendices 07
Appendices 170 Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϭ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ /ŶƚƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶ
dŚĞzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ ;WůĂŶͿWůĂŶΘWŽůŝĐLJZĞǀŝĞǁƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂŶŽǀĞƌǀŝĞǁŽĨ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚůŽĐĂůĂŶĚƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůƉůĂŶƐĂŶĚƐƚƵĚŝĞƐƚŽůĞǀĞƌĂŐĞƌĞůĂƚĞĚŐŽĂůƐ͕ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƚŽŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJ ĂŶĚĨŝůůŝŶŐĂƉƐĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚ͘dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞŵĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵƐƵŵŵĂƌŝnjĞƚŚĞƉůĂŶƐ͕ŐŽĂůƐ͕ĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƚŚĂƚƌĞůĂƚĞ ƚŽŵƵůƚŝͲŵŽĚĂůŵŽďŝůŝƚLJŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚƵĚLJĂƌĞĂ͘
WůĂŶƐнWŽůŝĐŝĞƐ
WůĂŶ >ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJ ŽƌŐĞŶĐŝĞƐ zĞĂƌŽĨ
ŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶ
^ƚĂƚĞ ĂůƚƌĂŶƐĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ
ĨŽƌŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϭϮ
ĂůƚƌĂŶƐ ϮϬϮϮ
dŽǁĂƌĚĂŶĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ Ͳ ^ƚĂƚĞ
ŝĐLJĐůĞнWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶWůĂŶ
ĂůƚƌĂŶƐ ϮϬϭϳ
ZĞŐŝŽŶĂů Connect SoCal ‐ The 2024 Regional
dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶͬ^ƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞ
ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐLJ
^' ϮϬϮϰ
ŽƵŶƚLJΘDƵůƚŝͲ
:ƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶĂů
KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJŝŬĞǁĂLJƐDĂƉ Kd ϮϬϮϮ
KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ
^ĐŚŽŽůĐƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ
Kd͕K, ϮϬϮϭ
>ŽĐĂů zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJWůĂŶ ŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ ϮϬϮϯ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ůĞŵĞŶƚhƉĚĂƚĞ
ŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ ϮϬϮϮ
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ>ŽĐĂů,ŝŐŚǁĂLJ^ĂĨĞƚLJ
WůĂŶ
ŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ ϮϬϮϮ
WůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗>ĂŶĚhƐĞ͖
DŽďŝůŝƚLJ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ͖,ĞĂůƚŚ͕tĞůůŶĞƐƐ͕
ĂŶĚ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů:ƵƐƚŝĐĞ͖KƉĞŶ
^ƉĂĐĞĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
ŝƚLJŽĨWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ ϮϬϭϵ
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗
ŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ
ŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ ϮϬϭϲ
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂWĂƌŬƐĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
DĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ
ŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ ϮϬϭϰ
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗ZŝĚŝŶŐ͕
,ŝŬŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŬĞǁĂLJdƌĂŝůƐ
ŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚ
ŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ ϮϬϬϱ
KƚŚĞƌWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĨĨŽƌƚƐ
KĐƚŝǀĞtĞďƐŝƚĞ Kd E
Appendix A: Previous Plan and Policy Review
Active Transportation Plan 171 Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ Ϯ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ ^ƚĂƚĞWůĂŶƐ
ĂůƚƌĂŶƐĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶĨŽƌŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϭϮ;ϮϬϮϮͿ dŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ;dͿWůĂŶĨŽƌŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϭϮŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůĞŶĞĞĚƐŽŶĂŶĚĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞ ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJ^LJƐƚĞŵ;^,^ͿĂŶĚƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞƐŚŝŐŚǁĂLJƐĞŐŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐƚŽŝŶĨůƵĞŶĐĞĨƵƚƵƌĞŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚƐŝŶKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘ dŚĞdWůĂŶǁĂƐŐƵŝĚĞĚďLJĂŶĚŝƐĂŶŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚƐƚĞƉŝŶŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƐƚĂƚĞǁŝĚĞďŝĐLJĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƉůĂŶ͕dŽǁĂƌĚĂŶ ĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ;ϮϬϭϳͿ͘
dŚĞdWůĂŶĐŽŶƐŝƐƚƐŽĨƚǁŽĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͗ƚŚĞ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJZĞƉŽƌƚĂŶĚĂŶŽŶůŝŶĞ^ƚŽƌLJDĂƉƚŚĂƚŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚƐĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐŝƐƐƵĞƐ͕ŶĞĞĚƐ͕ ĂŶĚŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJZĞƉŽƌƚ͘ ĂůƚƌĂŶƐĂŶĚĂŐĞŶĐLJƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐǁŝůůƵƐĞƚŚĞdWůĂŶƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĂĐƚŝǀĞ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŶĞĞĚƐĂůŽŶŐĂŶĚĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞ^,^ŝŶĨƵƚƵƌĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘ dŚĞ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJZĞƉŽƌƚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐŬĞLJĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞ^,^ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ͗ • DĂŝŶƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬŐĂƉƐ
• ^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐŝŶĨĂŝƌŽƌƉŽŽƌĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ
• ^ƚƌĞƐƐĨƵůƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐ
• /ŶĨƌĞƋƵĞŶƚĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐ
• ^ƚƌĞƐƐĨƵůďŝĐLJĐůĞƌŽƵƚĞƐ
• &ƌĞĞǁĂLJĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐ
dŚĞ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJZĞƉŽƌƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĂĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨĂƉƌŽĐĞƐƐƵƐĞĚƚŽƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞŶĞĞĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽŶƚŚĞ^,^ĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞŐŽĂůƐ ŽĨdŽǁĂƌĚĂŶĚĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͗ŵŽďŝůŝƚLJ͕ƐĂĨĞƚLJ͕ĞƋƵŝƚLJ͕ĂŶĚƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƌĞƐƵůƚƐĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŽŶĂƐƚĂƚŝĐ ŵĂƉĂŶĚ ĂƌĞĂůƐŽĂďůĞƚŽďĞƌĞǀŝĞǁĞĚǀŝĂƚŚĞĐŽŵƉĂŶŝŽŶ^ƚŽƌLJDĂƉ͘ >ĂƐƚůLJ͕ƚŚĞSummary Report includes a list of next steps for implementation of Caltrans’ statewide vision for an improved ǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂŶĚďŝŬŝŶŐĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞ^,^ŝŶKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘dŚŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ͗ • >ĞǀĞƌĂŐĞůŽĐĂůƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐ
• /ĚĞŶƚŝĨLJĂŶĚŝŶŝƚŝĂƚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ
• hƐĞƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƚŽƐĞůĞĐƚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ
• &ƵŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ
• dĂŬĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͲůĞǀĞůĂĐƚŝŽŶ
ĂůƚƌĂŶƐdŽǁĂƌĚĂŶĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ– ^ƚĂƚĞŝĐLJĐůĞнWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶWůĂŶ;ϮϬϭϳͿ Toward an Active California is Caltrans’ first statewide policy and plan that aims to support bicyclist and pedestrian travelŝŶŐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŬĞLJŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƐ͕ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĂĐƚŝŽŶƐ͘/ƚŝƐĂůŽŶŐͲrange plan that identifies the state’s sustainable multiͲŵŽĚĂů ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵ͕ƵŶŝƚŝŶŐƐŝdžŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůŵŽĚĂůƉůĂŶƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞ/ŶƚĞƌƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐWůĂŶ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ &ƌĞŝŐŚƚDŽďŝůŝƚLJWůĂŶ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ^ƚĂƚĞZĂŝůWůĂŶ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂǀŝĂƚŝŽŶ^LJƐƚĞŵWůĂŶ͕^ƚĂƚĞǁŝĚĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐWůĂŶ͕ĂŶĚ dŽǁĂƌĚĂŶĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘dŚĞƉůĂŶŝƐĂŶŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚĞůĞŵĞŶƚŽĨĂƐƚĂƚĞǁŝĚĞŐŽĂůƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌŽďƵƐƚŵƵůƚŝͲŵŽĚĂů ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŽƉƚŝŽŶƐƚŽĞǀĞƌLJŽŶĞŝŶĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘
dŽǁĂƌĚĂŶĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂƐĞĞŬƐƚŽĨƵůĨŝůůƚŚĞƐŝdžŐŽĂůƐŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϮϬϰϬ͕ĂŶĚĂŝŵƐƚŽ ĂĐŚŝĞǀĞŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƚĂƌŐĞƚƐƐĞƚŝŶƚŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ͗ • ŽƵďůĞǁĂůŬŝŶŐ͕ƚƌŝƉůĞďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚ͕ĂŶĚĚŽƵďůĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚďLJϮϬϮϬ • ZĞĚƵĐĞďŝĐLJĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĨĂƚĂůŝƚŝĞƐďLJƚĞŶƉĞƌĐĞŶƚƉĞƌLJĞĂƌ • /ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐďLJƚǁĞŶƚLJƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ
Appendices 172 Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϯ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ dŽǁĂƌĚĂŶĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĨŽƵƌŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽƐĂĨĞƚLJ͕ŵŽďŝůŝƚLJ͕ƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶ;ŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞͿ͕ĂŶĚƐŽĐŝĂů ĞƋƵŝƚLJ͖ĨŝĨƚĞĞŶƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ͖ĂŶĚƐŝdžƚLJĂĐƚŝŽŶƐƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƚŽĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘/ƚĂůƐŽŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƐĞǀĞƌĂůĂĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚĞdžƉĞĐƚĞĚƚŝŵĞĨƌĂŵĞƐ ĂŶĚĐŽƐƚƐ ĨŽƌŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
ZĞŐŝŽŶĂůWůĂŶƐ
SCAG Connect SoCal ‐ The 202ϰ ZĞŐŝŽŶĂůdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶͬ^ƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐLJ;ϮϬϮϰͿ SCAG’s Connect SoCal 2024ͲϮϬϱϬZĞŐŝŽŶĂůdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬĨŽƌĂƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵ ƚŚĂƚĞdžƉĂŶĚƐŵŽďŝůŝƚLJŽƉƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂĚǀĂŶĐĞƐƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJŐŽĂůƐ͕ĂŶĚƐĞĞŬƐƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨůŝĨĞĨŽƌŽǀĞƌϭϵŵŝůůŝŽŶ ƉĞŽƉůĞǁŚŽůŝǀĞŝŶƚŚĞ^'ŵĞƚƌŽƉŽůŝƚĂŶƌĞŐŝŽŶ͘dŚĞŐŽĂůƐŽĨŽŶŶĞĐƚ^ŽĂůĨĂůůŝŶƚŽĨŽƵƌĐŽƌĞĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐ͗ŵŽďŝůŝƚLJ͕ ŚĞĂůƚŚLJͬƚŚƌŝǀŝŶŐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚĞĐŽŶŽŵLJ͘dŚĞƉůĂŶůŝƐƚƐŐŽĂůƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ ƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐŝĞƐ͕ĞƋƵŝƚLJĂŶĚƌĞƐŝůŝĞŶĐĞĐŽƵƉůĞĚǁŝƚŚƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐĂŶĚƚĂƌŐĞƚƐ͘dŚĞŐŽĂůŽĨŽŶŶĞĐƚ^ŽĂůŝƐƚŽďĞƚŚĞ ƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĂŶĚŐƵŝĚŝŶŐĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjŝŶŐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐŝŶŐďĞŚĂǀŝŽƌĐŚĂŶŐĞĂŶĚĨƵƌƚŚĞƌŝŶŐ regional strategies that can shape Southern California’s transportation and land use development in the future. dŚĞ &ŝŶĂů Connect SoCal 2024 Plan was approved by SCAG’s Regional Council in April 2024͘ ŽƵŶƚLJΘDƵůƚŝͲ:ƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶĂůWůĂŶƐ
KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJŝŬĞǁĂLJƐDĂƉ;ϮϬϮϮͿ
Available on OCTA’s website, the Orange County Bikeways Map is a map showing bike lanes, routes, and paths throughout KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘dŚĞŵĂƉĂůƐŽŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƉĂƌŬĂŶĚƌŝĚĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕DĞƚƌŽůŝŶŬƐƚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐ ďŝŬĞ ůĂŶĞƐĂůŽŶŐƐƚĞĞƉŐƌĂĚĞƐ͘^ĞǀĞƌĂůďŝŬĞƐĂĨĞƚLJƚŝƉƐĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐďŝŬĞƐŽŶDĞƚƌŽůŝŶŬĂŶĚ KdďƵƐĞƐ͘
KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ^ĐŚŽŽůĐƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ;ϮϬϮϭͿ
dŚĞKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ^ĐŚŽŽůĐƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ;WůĂŶͿƐƵŵŵĂƌŝnjĞĚĨŝŶĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ ^ĐŚŽŽů;^Zd^ͿƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘/ƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĨŽƵƌŵĂŝŶƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͗ ϭ͘
ƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂĐŽƵŶƚLJǁŝĚĞ^Zd^ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ
Ϯ͘ ƌĞĂƚĞĂŶĚƐƵƐƚĂŝŶůĂƐƚŝŶŐƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐ
ϯ͘ ĞǀĞůŽƉĂĐƵůƚƵƌĞŽĨƐĂĨĞƚLJ
ϰ͘ &ƵŶĚĂŶĚďƵŝůĚƐĂĨĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ
dŚĞWůĂŶŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĂĐƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞƚŚĞƐĞĨŽƵƌƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƚŽ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚ^Zd^ĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐĂĐƌŽƐƐKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘
KdKĐƚŝǀĞtĞďƐŝƚĞ
dŚĞKdĐƚŝǀĞǁĞďƐŝƚĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĂŝŵĞĚĂƚƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŶŐĂŶĚĞŶŚĂŶĐŝŶŐŶŽŶͲ ŵŽƚŽƌŝnjĞĚĨŽƌŵƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘/ƚĚĞƚĂŝůƐǀĂƌŝŽƵƐŝŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŐĞĂƌĞĚ ƚŽǁĂƌĚƐŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐǁĂůŬŝŶŐ͕ďŝŬŝŶŐ͕ƐŬĂƚŝŶŐ͕ƵƐŝŶŐĂǁŚĞĞůĐŚĂŝƌ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂĐƚŝǀĞŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƌĞŐŝŽŶ͘ dŚĞǁĞďƐŝƚĞŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚƐƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ^ĐŚŽŽůĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŽŶĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚƉůĂŶŶĞĚ ďŝĐLJĐůĞŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƚŚĞK>ŽŽƉ͘/ƚĂůƐŽƐĞƌǀĞƐĂƐĂŚƵďĨŽƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚĂŶĚĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐŝŶŐ ƉƵďůŝĐŝŶǀŽůǀĞŵĞŶƚŝŶƐŚĂƉŝŶŐĨƵƚƵƌĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞŵŽƌĞůŝǀĂďůĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘
Active Transportation Plan 173 Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϰ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ >ŽĐĂůWůĂŶƐ
WůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ
WůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ;ϮϬϭϵͿ
>ĂŶĚhƐĞ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ
The Land Use Element sets the Placentia General Plan’s vision in motion by serving as a longͲƌĂŶŐĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐŐƵŝĚĞĨŽƌ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘/ƚĂŝŵƐƚŽĨƵůĨŝůůƐŝdžŬĞLJĂĐŚŝĞǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ŽĨǁŚŝĐŚĞĂĐŚŝƐĂĐĐŽŵƉĂŶŝĞĚďLJŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŝŶ ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮ͘ϳŽĨƚŚĞ>ĂŶĚhƐĞ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ͗
ϭ͘ ĂůĂŶĐĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐŐƌŽǁƚŚ
Ϯ͘ ŽŵƉĂƚŝďůĞĂŶĚŚŝŐŚͲƋƵĂůŝƚLJĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
ϯ͘ ZĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƵƐĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐ
ϰ͘ WƌŽƚĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨŶĂƚƵƌĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ
ϱ͘ tĞůůĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƉůĂĐĞƐ͕ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ĂŶĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĐĂƉĞƐ
ϲ͘ WƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶŽĨŚŝŐŚͲƋƵĂůŝƚLJŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ dŚĞ>ĂŶĚhƐĞ
ůĞŵĞŶƚďŽƚŚƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞƐĂŶĚŝƐƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚďLJƚŚĞŽƚŚĞƌĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐŽĨƚŚĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶĂŶĚŝƐŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĞĚ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƚŚĞƌŝƚLJƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƚŽŽůƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŽŶŝŶŐDĂƉ͕ŽŶŝŶŐŽĚĞ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƉůĂŶƐ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ agreements and the City’s Capital Improvement Program. ZĞůĞǀĂŶƚŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ 'K>>h – ϱ͗/ŵƉƌŽǀĞƵƌďĂŶĚĞƐŝŐŶŝŶWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝƐďŽƚŚĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůůLJĂƚƚƌĂĐƚŝǀĞĂŶĚ ĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůLJĐŽŵƉĂƚŝďůĞĂŶĚƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĂďůĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂƌĞĂƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ>hͲ ϱ͘Ϯ͗ ĞǀĞůŽƉĐŝƚLJǁŝĚĞǀŝƐƵĂůĂŶĚĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶůŝŶŬĂŐĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚĞŶĞĚůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ ůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůĞƚƌĂŝůƐ͘
'K>>h – ϴ͗ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽĚŝǀĞƌƐŝĨLJƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĐŚŽŝĐĞƐŝŶWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂĨŽƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĂŶĚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ>hͲ ϴ͘ϰ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂůůĐůĂƐƐĞƐŽĨďŝŬĞůĂŶĞƐ͕ďŝŬĞƉĂƚŚƐ͕ĂŶĚďŝŬĞƌŽƵƚĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞĐŝƚLJĂƐŶĞǁ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽƌƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĐĐƵƌƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ>hͲ ϴ͘ϱ͗ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌŶĞǁĂŶĚŝŶŶŽǀĂƚŝǀĞŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌŝŶŶĞƌĐŝƚLJƚƌĂǀĞůĂŶĚĨŽƌůŽĐĂůƌĞŐŝŽŶĂů ƚƌĂǀĞů͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐŵŽƚŽƌŝnjĞĚďŝŬĞƐ͕ƐĐŽŽƚĞƌƐ͕ƌŝĚĞͲƐŚĂƌĞ͕ĞƚĐ͘ 'K>>h – ϵ͗ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŚŝŐŚƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨƉƵďůŝĐŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ>hͲ ϵ͘ϯ͗ Adopt a “Complete Streets” policy, which embodies the community’s intent to plan, design, ŽƉĞƌĂƚĞĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƐŽƚŚĞLJĂƌĞƐĂĨĞĨŽƌĂůůƵƐĞƌƐŽĨĂůůĂŐĞƐĂŶĚĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘dŚĞƐĞƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƐŚĂůůŐƵŝĚĞƚŚĞ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞĂůůĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƵƐĞƌƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐ͕ ƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƵƐĞƌƐ͕ŵŽƚŽƌŝƐƚƐĂŶĚĨƌĞŝŐŚƚǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐ͘
DŽďŝůŝƚLJ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ
The Mobility Element represents the City’s overall transportation management plan. The transportation plan includes both ƚŚĞƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵŝƚƐĞůĨƐƵĐŚĂƐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͕ŚŝŐŚǁĂLJƐ͕ƌĂŝůůŝŶĞƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞƌŽƵƚĞƐĂŶĚƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƚŚĞ ǀĂƌŝŽƵƐŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐƵĐŚĂƐĐĂƌƐ͕ďƵƐĞƐ͕ƚƌƵĐŬƐ͕ƚƌĂŝŶƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞƐ͕ƌŝĚĞƐŚĂƌŝŶŐ͕ŽŶĚĞŵĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ ƵƐŝŶŐƚŚĞƐĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞƚƌĂĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůǀĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐŽĨƚŚĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͕ƚŚĞDŽďŝůŝƚLJ
ůĞŵĞŶƚĂůƐŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞƐŝŶƚĞƌͲĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĞĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĂŶĚĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŵŽĚĞƐ;ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ďŝŬĞƐŚĂƌĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ĂŶĚ bicycles) to the level that recognizes the City’s commitment toward advancing transportation innovation as well as long ƚĞƌŵƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJĂƐŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶ^ϯϳϱ͘
Appendices 174 Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϱ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ dŚĞDŽďŝůŝƚLJ
ůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƚŽĞŶĂďůĞƚŚĞŝƚLJƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚĂĚŽƉƚĂŶĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶ͘ ZĞůĞǀĂŶƚŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
'K>DK– ϯ͗
ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĂŶĚĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŵŽĚĞƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞƐ͕ƌŝĚĞƐŚĂƌŝŶŐ͕ ĂŶĚǁĂůŬŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉůĂŶƐĂŶĚƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŶĞĞĚƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϯ͘ϭ͗
ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŚŝĐŚŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞŝŶŶŽǀĂƚŝǀĞŵĞƚŚŽĚƐŽĨ ĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚŝŶŐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĚĞŵĂŶĚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϯ͘Ϯ͗ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨĂŚŝŐŚƋƵĂůŝƚLJ ƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐLJƐƚĞŵƚŚĂƚŵŝŶŝŵŝnjĞƐĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶĐLJŽŶ ƚŚĞĂƵƚŽŵŽďŝůĞ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϯ͘ϯ͗
ŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚĞĨĨĞĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĞŵĂŶĚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ;dDͿŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƐƵĐŚ ĂƐƌŝĚĞƐŚĂƌŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚǀĞŚŝĐůĞŽĐĐƵƉĂŶĐLJĂƌĞďĞŝŶŐŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĞĚ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϯ͘ϰ͗ /ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐĂŶĚĐƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬƐƚŽŵĞĞƚƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƵƐĞƐĂŶĚŶĞĞĚƐ͕ǁŚŝĐŚƐĞƌǀĞ ƚŽĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϯ͘ϱ͗ ZĞƐƉŽŶĚƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƐŝŶĚĞŵĂŶĚĨŽƌĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůďƵƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŝŶƚĞƌĂĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚKdĂŶĚ ŽƚŚĞƌĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĂŶĚƐĞĞŬŽƵƚŐƌĂŶƚĨƵŶĚŝŶŐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƵƉƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂůƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ĨŝdžĞĚďƵƐͬƚƌŽůůĞLJƌŽƵƚĞƐŽƌƐƵďƐŝĚŝnjĞĚŽŶͲĚĞŵĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐ>LJĨƚŽƌhďĞƌ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϯ͘ϲ͗ /ŶƐƚĂůůŚĂŶĚŝĐĂƉĂĐĐĞƐƐƌĂŵƉƐƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚŝƐĂďůĞĚĂĐĐĞƐƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϯ͘ϳ͗
ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĐĂƉĞĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŵĞŶƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϯ͘ϴ͗ ŽŽƉĞƌĂƚĞĂŶĚĂƐƐŝƐƚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĂŐĞŶĐLJĞĨĨŽƌƚƐƚŽĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚƐďLJŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐ ƉĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌůŽĂĚŝŶŐƐŝƚĞƐďLJƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐďƵƐďĞŶĐŚĞƐ͕ƐĂĨĞƚLJůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽĞŶŚĂŶĐĞďƵƐƐƚŽƉƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϯ͘ϵ͗ tŽƌŬŝŶŐĐŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝǀĞůLJǁŝƚŚKd͕ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDĞƚƌŽůŝŶŬ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂƐǁĞůůĂƐŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĂŶĚŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌƚŚĞƐƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƐĞƌǀĞďŽƚŚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĂŶĚ ĐŽŵŵƵƚĞƌƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϯ͘ϭϬ͗ ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞ ƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĚĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂůůƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƵƐĞƌƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϯ͘ϭϭ͗ ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĂŶĚĨƌŽŵƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƌŽƵƚĞƐďLJǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐĂŶĚ ďLJƉĞŽƉůĞǁŝƚŚĚŝƐĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘
'K>DK– ϰ͗
ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞďŝĐLJĐůĞƚƌĂǀĞůĂƐĂƉƌŝŵĂƌLJŵŽĚĞŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϭ͗ ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚĂĚŽƉƚĂĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞďŝĐLJĐůĞŵĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶƚŽƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƌĞŐŝŽŶ͕ƐƚĂƚĞ͕ĂŶĚĨĞĚĞƌĂů ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘Ϯ͗ KŶĐĞĂĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞďŝĐLJĐůĞŵĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶŝƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ͕ƵƉĚĂƚĞŝƚĂƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJ͗ŐĞŶĞƌĂůůLJ͕ĂĨŝǀĞͲ LJĞĂƌĐLJĐůĞ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϯ͗ ZĞǀŝĞǁƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐůĂƐƐ/͕//ĂŶĚ///ďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐĂŶĚŵŽĚŝĨLJĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽĐŽŵƉůLJǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂůŽŶhŶŝĨŽƌŵdƌĂĨĨŝĐŽŶƚƌŽůĞǀŝĐĞƐ;DhdͿ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϰ͗ WƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝƌĞĐƚ͕ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŽƵƐďŝĐLJĐůĞƌŽƵƚĞƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵƵƚĞƌĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐƚŚĂƚĂůƐŽ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞƐĂĨĞƉĂƐƐĂŐĞŽĨĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐ͘
Active Transportation Plan 175 Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϲ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϱ͗ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞƐĂĨĞĂŶĚĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚŵŽǀĞŵĞŶƚŽĨĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĂŶĚĂĐƌŽƐƐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚďŝĐLJĐůĞĚĞƚĞĐƚŝŽŶƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƚŚĞDhd͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϲ͗ /ŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞďŝĐLJĐůĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝŶƚŽƚŚĞƚƌĂĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϳ͗ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐƚŚĂƚŵŝŶŝŵŝnjĞĐLJĐůŝƐƚͬŵŽƚŽƌŝƐƚĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚ ƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞ'ŽůĚĞŶǀĞŶƵĞƌŝĚŐĞƚŽůŝŶŬĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJƚŽ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞK>ŽŽƉWƌŽũĞĐƚƚŽĨƵƌƚŚĞƌůŝŶŬ ŵƵůƚŝƉůĞďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐŝŶƚŽĂϲϲͲŵŝůĞďƌĂŶĚĞĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶĂŶĚĐĞŶƚƌĂůKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJĂƐǁĞůůĂƐ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ'ŽWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ>ŽŽƉůŝŶŬŝŶŐƚŚĞWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDĞƚƌŽůŝŶŬ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽŵĂũŽƌĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƐŶĞĂƌĂŶĚ ĂƌŽƵŶĚWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϴ͗ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůĂŶĚƐƵďͲƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůĞĨĨŽƌƚƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐĂƌĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚǁŚĞŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐŶĞǁ ŽƌƌĞƚƌŽĨŝƚƚŝŶŐĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƐLJƐƚĞŵƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϵ͗ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŽĐŽŵƉůLJǁŝƚŚƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞĚďŝĐLJĐůĞŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŽĨƚŚĞ&ĞĚĞƌĂů,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ;&,tͿ͕ƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚŽĨdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ ;ĂůƚƌĂŶƐͿĂŶĚƚŚĞŵĞƌŝĐĂŶƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂŶĚdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶKĨĨŝĐŝĂůƐ;^,dKͿ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϭϬ͗ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĨĨŽƌƚƐƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶ͕ĞdžƉĂŶĚĂŶĚĐƌĞĂƚĞŶĞǁĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ ďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐ͕ƚŚĞďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐŝŶŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŝŶŐũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϭϭ͗ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͕ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŚĂƚŵĂŬĞďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐƐĂĨĞƌĂŶĚŵŽƌĞĐŽŶǀĞŶŝĞŶƚĨŽƌĂůů ƚLJƉĞƐŽĨĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϭϮ͗ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐŝŶĐŽŶũƵŶĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚůŽĐĂůďŝĐLJĐůĞƐŚŽƉƐ͕ŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚ ĂĚǀŽĐĂƚĞƐƚŽĨŽƐƚĞƌƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞƌŝĚĞƌƐŚŝƉĂŶĚƌĞĚƵĐĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϭϯ͗ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŽĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞƐĂĨĞƌƚƌĂǀĞůďLJďŝĐLJĐůĞƚŽŬĞLJĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚƚŚĞůĂƌŐĞƌƌĞŐŝŽŶ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŶĞǁDĞƚƌŽůŝŶŬƐƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ǁŚĞŶĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϭϰ͗ ZĞƋƵŝƌĞƚŚĂƚŶĞǁƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJĨŽƌďŝĐLJĐůĞůĂŶĞƐ͕ ǁŚĞƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϭϱ͗ tŚĞƌĞƐƉĂĐĞĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞƌŽĂĚǁĂLJĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJĞdžŝƐƚ͕ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽŝŶƐƚĂůůďŝŬĞ ƌŽƵƚĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϭϲ͗ Work with the Orange County Flood Control District under the City and District’s cooperative ĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚƵƚŝůŝnjĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂĂƐŽĨĨͲƌŽĂĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůďŝŬĞƚƌĂŝůƐĂŶĚůŽŽƉ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶƐƚŽŽƚŚĞƌĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐŽƌƉůĂŶŶĞĚŽŶͲƐƚƌĞĞƚďŝĐLJĐůĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϭϳ͗ ^ĞĞŬŽƵƚŐƌĂŶƚĨƵŶĚŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŽĨƵŶĚƚŚĞĐŽƐƚŽĨĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŽĨĨͲƌŽĂĚďŝĐLJĐůĞĂŶĚ ƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůƚƌĂŝůƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϭϴ͗ ZĞĚƵĐĞŽƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐŽŶĂƌƚĞƌŝĂůƌŽĂĚƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƉĂĐĞĨŽƌĞdžƉĂŶĚŝŶŐůĂƐƐ//ďŝĐLJĐůĞ ůĂŶĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϰ͘ϭϵ͗ WůĂŶĨŽƌĂŶĚŐŝǀĞĐĂƌĞĨƵůĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚ ĚĞǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŶŐƚŚĞŝƌƵƐĞǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐͲƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨǁĂLJ͘
Appendices 176 Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϳ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ 'K>DK– ϲ͗ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞĂŶĚĐŽŽƉĞƌĂƚĞǁŝƚŚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŝŶŐũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJĂŶĚƚŚĞƌĞŐŝŽŶƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĂŶĚ ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĐŽŶŐĞƐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƚƌĂĨĨŝĐŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲ ϲ͘ϱtŽƌŬǁŝƚŚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŝŶŐũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐƚŽůŝŶŬƵƉďŝĐLJĐůĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůƚƌĂŝůƐƚŽĞdžƉĂŶĚ ƚŚĞŝƌƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůƌĞĂĐŚĂŶĚďĞŶĞĨŝƚƐƚŽƚŚĞůĂƌŐĞƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ ,ĞĂůƚŚ͕tĞůůŶĞƐƐ͕ĂŶĚ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů:ƵƐƚŝĐĞ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ
dŚĞ,ĞĂůƚŚ͕tĞůůŶĞƐƐ͕ĂŶĚ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů:ƵƐƚŝĐĞ
ůĞŵĞŶƚĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞƐƚŚĞǁĂLJƐĂĐŝƚLJĐĂŶƉƌŽŵŽƚĞĂŶĚŝŶĨůƵĞŶĐĞŚĞĂůƚŚLJ ůŝĨĞƐƚLJůĞƐǀŝĂĞƋƵĂůĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚƉůĂĐĞƐƚŚĂƚŵĂŬĞĂŶĚŬĞĞƉĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐŚĞĂůƚŚLJ͘ ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬ͘ϴŽĨƚŚĞ ůĞŵĞŶƚ
ĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞƐƚŚĞǁĂLJƐŝŶǁŚŝĐŚǁĂůŬĂďůĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĂŶĚƋƵĂůŝƚLJĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐ ĂŵƉůĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐĐĂŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŚĞĂůƚŚŝĞƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚĨŽƐƚĞƌĞƋƵĂůĂĐĐĞƐƐ͘ ZĞůĞǀĂŶƚŐŽĂůƐ ĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
'K>,tͬ
:– Ϯ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐ͕ďŽƚŚƉƌŝǀĂƚĞĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐ͕ƚŚĂƚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJ͕ďŝŬŝŶŐ ĂŶĚǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂƐĂŵĞĂŶƐƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞƌĂƚĞƐŽĨŽďĞƐŝƚLJ͕ŚĞĂƌƚĚŝƐĞĂƐĞ͕ĚŝĂďĞƚĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŚĞĂůƚŚͲƌĞůĂƚĞĚŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ Ϯ͘ϭ͗ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂŵĞŶĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŽŶŝŶŐŽĚĞƚŽĂůůŽǁŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚͲƐĞƌǀŝŶŐƌĞƚĂŝůƵƐĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĂƚŬĞLJŶŽĚĞƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌƌĞƚĂŝůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶŽŶĞͲƋƵĂƌƚĞƌŵŝůĞŽĨĂůůƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐ͘ WĞƌŵŝƚƚŚĞƐĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚͲƐĞƌǀŝŶŐƵƐĞƐǁŝƚŚƌĞĚƵĐĞĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ Ϯ͘Ϯ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞƉƵďůŝĐƐƉĂĐĞƐƚŚĂƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƉůĞĂƐĂŶƚƉůĂĐĞƐŝŶǁŚŝĐŚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌƐĐĂŶŵĞĞƚ͕ĐŽŶŐƌĞŐĂƚĞ͕ ĂŶĚďĞƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůůLJĂĐƚŝǀĞƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ Ϯ͘ϯ͗&ŽƌŵƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐǁŝƚŚƐĐŚŽŽůĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶƐƚŝƚƵƚŝŽŶƐ͕ŶŽŶͲƉƌŽĨŝƚ ŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚĂůĂŐĞŶĐŝĞƐƚŽĨŽƐƚĞƌĂŶĚƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶĞĨĨŽƌƚƐ ƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŶŐŚĞĂůƚŚLJůŝĨĞƐƚLJůĞƐ͕ƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJĂŶĚƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞŚĞĂůƚŚŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ Ϯ͘ϱ͗ZĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐŐƌĞĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŵŽƌĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůƐƉĂĐĞƐĂŶĚĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞŐƌĞĂƚĞƌ ŽƵƚĚŽŽƌƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ Ϯ͘ϲ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞĨƌĞĞŽƌƐƵďƐŝĚŝnjĞĚĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĞdžĞƌĐŝƐĞĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚŝŶƉƵďůŝĐĂƌĞĂƐŶŽƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƵƐĞĚĨŽƌ ƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJŽƉƚŝŽŶƐ͘
'K>,tͬ
:– ϯ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŚŝŐŚͲƋƵĂůŝƚLJƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŶĞƚǁŽƌŬƐŽƚŚĂƚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĨƌŽŵĂůůŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĐĂŶƐĂĨĞůLJǁĂůŬƚŽ ƚŚĞŝƌĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϯ͘ϭ͗^ƚƌŝǀĞƚŽŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬĚĞĨŝĐŝĞŶĐŝĞƐŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂĨĞƚLJĂŶĚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞǁĂůŬŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŝŶWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϯ͘Ϯ͗ DĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂĨĞƚLJĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƐĂĨĞƚLJĂƚƌŽĂĚǁĂLJĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞŝƚLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶŽĨŵĂƌŬĞĚĐƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬƐ͕ŚŝŐŚͲǀŝƐŝďŝůŝƚLJŵĂƌŬŝŶŐƐ͕ĂŶĚƉŚLJƐŝĐĂů ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐŝƐůĂŶĚƐ͕ƌĂŝƐĞĚĐƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬƐ͕ĐƵƌďĞdžƚĞŶƐŝŽŶƐ͕ƌĞĚƵĐĞĚƌĂĚŝŝĂƚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ ƉĞƌƉĞŶĚŝĐƵůĂƌĐƵƌďƌĂŵƉƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐŬŶŽǁŶƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂĨĞƚLJ͘ƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬƐƐŚŽƵůĚďĞŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚ ŽŶDĞůƌŽƐĞǀĞŶƵĞĨŽƌƚŚŽƐĞƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞtŚŝƚƚĞŶĞŶƚĞƌƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϯ͘ϯ͗ /ŵƉƌŽǀĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐŽŶƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͕ďƵƚĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJŝŶŚŝŐŚͲǀŽůƵŵĞ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂƌĞĂƐĂŶĚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϯ͘ϰ͗ WƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐĂŶĚƚŚĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞƐĂŶĚĂƌĞĂƐ ĂƌŽƵŶĚƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂŶĚƉĂƌŬƐ͘
Active Transportation Plan 177 Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϴ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϯ͘ϱ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶǀŽůǀŝŶŐůĂŶĚƵƐĞĂŶĚnjŽŶŝŶŐĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĚĂŝůLJƌĞƚĂŝůŶĞĞĚƐ͕ƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐƚŽƉƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂǁĂůŬĂďůĞĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ;ŝ͘Ğ͕͘ĂƋƵĂƌƚĞƌͲƚŽĂ ŚĂůĨͲŵŝůĞͿŽĨĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůĂƌĞĂƐĂŶĚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϯ͘ϲ͗DĂŬĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƉƵďůŝĐƐƉĂĐĞƐŵŽƌĞǀŝƐƵĂůůLJĂƉƉĞĂůŝŶŐĂŶĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůůLJĨƌŝĞŶĚůLJďLJ ƉůĂŶƚŝŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚƚƌĞĞƐ͕ŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͕ĂĚĚŝŶŐĚĞĐŽƌĂƚŝǀĞƐƚƌĞĞƚĨƵƌŶŝƚƵƌĞ͕ĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƌůLJĐůĞĂŶŝŶŐƚŚĞ ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐĂŶĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ 3.7: Develop public art, fountains and other forms that beautify Placentia’s streets and provide a ĐŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚŽƵƚĚŽŽƌĂƌƚǁŽƌŬƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘/ĚĞŶƚŝĨLJŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚĨƵŶĚůŽĐĂů ĂƌƚŝƐƚƐĂŶĚƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞƉƵďůŝĐĂƌƚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘
'K>,tͬ
:– ϰ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐƚŚĂƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨĚĂŝůLJŐŽŽĚƐĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚ ƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĐŽŵĨŽƌƚĂďůĞǁĂůŬŝŶŐĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨŚŽŵĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϰ͘ϯ͗ ĞǀĞůŽƉŽƌƌŝĚŽƌ/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶƐĨŽƌŬĞLJĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJƚŽŐƵŝĚĞ ƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞƐĞĂƌĞĂƐŝŶƚŽŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐĂŶĚŶŽĚĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϰ͘ϰ͗ &ƵůůLJŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƚŚĞKůĚdŽǁŶZĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶĂŶĚƚŚĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚKƌŝĞŶƚĞĚ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞ͕ĂƐƚŚŽƐĞĂƌĞĂƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉƵŶĚĞƌƚŚĞƐĞƉůĂŶƐ͕ƚŚĂƚĂĨƵůůƌĂŶŐĞŽĨƌĞƚĂŝůĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ĂƌĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶǁĂůŬŝŶŐŽƌĞĂƐLJƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϰ͘ϱ͗ hƉĚĂƚĞŽŶŝŶŐŽĚĞƚŽĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞĂŶLJďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚŝŶŐƚŚĞŐŽĂůŽĨĐƌĞĂƚŝŶŐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐǁŝƚŚĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƌĞƚĂŝůĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶǁĂůŬŝŶŐĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨŚŽŵĞƐ͘ 'K>,tͬ
:– ϱ͗^ĞĞŬƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĂůůƉƵďůŝĐĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞ͕ ĞŵĞƌŐĞŶĐLJƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ƉĂƌŬƐ͕ĐƵůƚƵƌĂůĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĐĞŶƚĞƌƐĨŽƌĂůůƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͕ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJƚŚŽƐĞŝŶƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:– ϱ͘ϭ͗ ZĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĨŽƌĐĂƌĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĚĞƐŝŐŶŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐĂůŵŝŶŐ͕ ĞŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĞĨĨŽƌƚƐŝŶƉƵďůŝĐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶŶŽƵŶĐĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĐŝƚLJĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞĚŶĞǁƐůĞƚƚĞƌƐ͘DĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĚĂƚĂ ŽŶĂŶĚƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚŚŝŐŚŝŶĐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐŽĨďŝĐLJĐůĞͬƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬǀĞŚŝĐůĞĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϱ͘Ϯ͗ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĞŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚĐĂŵƉĂŝŐŶƐŽŶƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞ͕ĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚŽƉƚŝŽŶƐ͘
ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞďŝĐLJĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂĨĞƚLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŝŶĐĞŶƚŝǀĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͘ ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞ
ďŝĐLJĐůĞƐĂĨĞƚLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚĂƌŐĞƚŝŶŐďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐĂŶĚŵŽƚŽƌŝƐƚƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŽŶĂůĞǀĞŶƚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐ ďŝĐLJĐůĞƌŽĚĞŽƐĂŶĚĨƌĞĞŚĞůŵĞƚĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚŝŽŶĞǀĞŶƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϱ͘ϯ͗
džĞĐƵƚĞƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŚĂƚĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƵƐĞĂŶĚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϱ͘ϰ͗/ŶŶĞǁƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƐƚƌĞƐƐƚŚĞƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJŽĨďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐĂŶĚǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂƐĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐƚŽ ĚƌŝǀŝŶŐĂŶĚĂƐĂŵĞĂŶƐŽĨŝŶĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐůĞǀĞůƐŽĨƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϱ͘ϲ͗ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽƉƵƌƐƵĞƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞƐLJƐƚĞŵŽĨƉĂƌĂͲƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌƐĞŶŝŽƌƐĂŶĚƉĞŽƉůĞŽĨĂůůĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJĂŶĚƚŽƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůƉƵďůŝĐĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJŵĞĚŝĐĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϱ͘ϳ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞƵƌďĂŶƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƚŚĂƚďĂůĂŶĐĞƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͕ǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌ ŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂǀĞůďLJĂĚŽƉƚŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŐĂŽŵƉůĞƚĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϱ͘ϴ͗ĞǀĞůŽƉƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐƚŽĐĂůŵƚƌĂĨĨŝĐŽŶƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƚŚĂƚĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞƐƉĞĞĚŝŶŐŽƌĐƵƚͲƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ͘ /ŶĐůƵĚĞĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕ĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĞŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ͘
Appendices 178 Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϵ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϱ͘ϵ͗ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĐĂƉĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽĞŶŚĂŶĐĞĂĐĐĞƐƐ͕ůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ͕ƐĂĨĞƚLJĂŶĚ ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞĨŽƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐ͕ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƵƐĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚŵŽƚŽƌŝƐƚƐ͘&ŽĐƵƐŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŚŝŐŚĞƐƚ ŶĞĞĚ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƚŚĞKůĚdŽǁŶ͕Ɛ͕ŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐ͕ĂŶĚŬĞLJŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϱ͘ϭϬ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĞĐƵƌĞďŝĐLJĐůĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŶĚƐƚŽƌĂŐĞŝŶĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ 5.11: Facilitate street closures for farmers’ markets, arts and craft fairs, CicLAvía events (bicycle and ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĞǀĞŶƚƐͿ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƉƵďůŝĐĞǀĞŶƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϱ͘ϭϰ͗ƌĞĂƚĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůŝnjĞĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĨŽƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐůŝǀŝŶŐǁŝƚŚĐŚƌŽŶŝĐĚŝƐĞĂƐĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐ͕ĚŝĂďĞƚĞƐĂŶĚ ŚĞĂƌƚĚŝƐĞĂƐĞ͕ƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚLJĞĂƚŝŶŐĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϱ͘ϭϳ͗ WƌŽŵŽƚĞŵŽƌĞĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJŽŶƐƚƌĞĞƚƐǁŝƚŚƉƵďůŝĐĞǀĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚƵƐĞƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϱ͘ϭϴ͗ ĚŽƉƚĂĐŝƚLJͲǁŝĚĞďŝĐLJĐůĞŵĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶƚŚĂƚǁŝůůĞǀĞŶƚƵĂůůLJĐŽŶŶĞĐƚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐƚŽƌĞƚĂŝůĂƌĞĂƐ͕ ƉĂƌŬ͕ƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ĂŶĚŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͘dŚŝƐƉůĂŶǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽĐŽŶŶĞĐƚƚŽďŝŬĞƚƌĂŝůƐŝŶ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚĐŝƚŝĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϱ͘ϭϵ͗
ŶƐƵƌĞĂƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵƚŚĂƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐƐĂĨĞ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚLJ͕ĂŶĚĂĐƚŝǀĞůŝĨĞƐƚLJůĞƐ͕ďLJƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĂŶĚŵƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂůĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚLJďĞƚǁĞĞŶƉĂƌŬƐ͕ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͕ĂŶĚKůĚdŽǁŶ͘ 'K>,tͬ
:– ϲ͗
ŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚĂůůĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶŚĂǀĞƐĂĨĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂŶĚƉĂƌŬƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϲ͘ϭ͗WƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚƐƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƐĂĨĞƚLJĂƌŽƵŶĚƉĂƌŬƐ͕ŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐ͕ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ƉƌĞƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ĂŶĚĐŚŝůĚĐĂƌĞĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϲ͘Ϯ͗ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞdžĞĐƵƚŝŽŶŽĨĂ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ^ĐŚŽŽůƉůĂŶĨŽƌĂůůWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͘WƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŚŝŐŚĞƐƚƐĂĨĞƚLJĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐ͘&ŽĐƵƐŝŶŝƚŝĂůĞĨĨŽƌƚƐŽŶƚŚĞƌŽƵƚĞŽǀĞƌƚŚĞϱϳ&ƌĞĞǁĂLJ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϲ͘ϯ͗/ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐĂůŵŝŶŐƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐŝŶĂƌĞĂƐŝŵŵĞĚŝĂƚĞůLJĂƌŽƵŶĚƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂŶĚƉĂƌŬƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ 6.4: Encourage the creation of “Walking School Bus,” “Biking School Bus,” “Bicycle Trains,” contests ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŚĂƚĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶƚŽǁĂůŬŽƌďŝĐLJĐůĞƚŽƐĐŚŽŽůĂŶĚŵĂŬĞŝƚƐĂĨĞƌƚŽĚŽƐŽ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϲ͘ϱ͗tŽƌŬĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƚŝǀĞůLJǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƐĐŚŽŽůĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͕ƐĐŚŽŽůďŽĂƌĚ͕Wd͕ĂŶĚƐƚŽŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJĂŶĚ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐƐĐŚŽŽůĂĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚƐĂĨĞƚLJŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘&ŽƌŵĂƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂĨĞƚLJĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƚŚĂƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŵĞŵďĞƌƐŽĨƚŚĞƐĞŐƌŽƵƉƐ ĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕WƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ͕ĂŶĚWŽůŝĐĞĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϲ͘ϲ͗
ŶŚĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚůŝŐŚƚƐŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƐĂĨĞƚLJĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͕ƚŚĞĐƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬƐƵƐĞĚďLJƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJ ǁŚĞƌĞƚŚŽƐĞĐƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬƐĂƌĞƵƐĞĚďLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐŐŽŝŶŐƚŽƐĐŚŽŽů͕ƚŚĞƉĂƌŬ͕ŽƌĂůŽĐĂůƌĞƚĂŝůĞƌ͘ 'K>,tͬ
:– ϳ͗
ŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚƉĂƌŬƐ͕ƚƌĂŝůƐ͕ŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƚŚĂƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂĐƚŝǀĞ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚLJƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ ĂŶĚĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐĂƌĞĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂĂŶĚĂƌĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞƚŽƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐŽĨĚŝƐĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϳ͘Ϯ͗ ^ĞĞŬŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŽĐŽŶǀĞƌƚƉƵďůŝĐĞĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƵƚŝůŝƚLJĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐĂŶĚƉĂƌŬǁĂLJǀŝƐƚĂƐ͕ ŝŶƚŽƉĂƌŬƐĂŶĚƚƌĂŝůƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϳ͘ϰ͗ WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂǁŝĚĞƌĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJŽĨĂĐƚŝǀĞĂŶĚƉĂƐƐŝǀĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐŝŶĂůůƉĂƌŬƐƚŚĂƚƌĞƐƉŽŶĚƚŽ ƚŚĞŶĞĞĚƐŽĨŵƵůƚŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůĂŶĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϳ͘ϳ͗
džƉĂŶĚĂŶĚƚĂŝůŽƌƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƚŽŵĞĞƚĞǀŽůǀŝŶŐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ needs. Programs and services should remain accessible and relevant to today’s residents, responding to unique ĐƵůƚƵƌĂů͕ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂŶĚƐŽĐŝĂůŶĞĞĚƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĐŚĂŶŐŝŶŐĚĞŵŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐƐĂŶĚŝŶĐŽŵĞůĞǀĞůƐ͘
Active Transportation Plan 179 Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϭϬ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϳ͘ϴ͗ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐǁŝƚŚĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ͕ƐŝŐŶĂŐĞ͕ŚŽƵƌƐ ŽĨŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞŽĨƚŚĞŵƵůƚŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůŶĞĞĚƐĂŶĚŝŶĐŽŵĞůĞǀĞůƐŽĨƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ WƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJƵƉŐƌĂĚĞƐŵĂLJŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJƚŽĂƚƚƌĂĐƚƉĞŽƉůĞĨƌŽŵŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJ ƵŶĚĞƌƐĞƌǀĞĚ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϳ͘ϵ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽŶŽŶͲŝƚLJŽƉĞƌĂƚĞĚƉĂƌŬƐĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϳ͘ϭϯ͗ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚĂĚŽƉƚĚĞƐŝŐŶŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐƚŚĂƚĚĞƚĞƌĐƌŝŵŝŶĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJŝŶŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͕ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ ƉƵďůŝĐĂƌĞĂƐ͘/ŶĐůƵĚĞŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨƉůĂLJĂƌĞĂƐ͕ƉĂƌŬƐ͕ƐƉŽƌƚƐĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐ͕ƉůĂnjĂƐ ĂŶĚƵƌďĂŶƉŽĐŬĞƚƉĂƌŬƐ͕ĂŶĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůƐŝƚĞƐ͕ĂŵŽŶŐŽƚŚĞƌƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϳ͘ϭϰ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞŝƚLJͲǁŝĚĞŝŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞƐĂŶĚĞdžƚĞƌŶĂůƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ ĨŽƌĐŽŶƚĂĐƚǁŝƚŚŶĂƚƵƌĞ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϳ͘ϭϱ͗ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĐŝƚLJǁŝĚĞďŝŬĞƐŚĂƌĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͘
'K>,tͬ
:– ϭϬ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞůĂŶĚƵƐĞĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐƚŚĂƚƌĞĚƵĐĞŐƌĞĞŶŚŽƵƐĞŐĂƐĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ͕ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞ ƌĞƐƉŝƌĂƚŽƌLJŚĞĂůƚŚ͕ĞŶŚĂŶĐĞĂŝƌƋƵĂůŝƚLJĂŶĚƌĞĚƵĐĞĐůŝŵĂƚĞĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŝŶĚŝƐĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϭϬ͘ϭ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐƚŚĂƚƌĞĚƵĐĞĚƌŝǀŝŶŐĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞǁĂůŬŝŶŐ͕ĐLJĐůŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƵƐĞ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϭϬ͘ϯ͗WƵƌƐƵĞĨƵŶĚŝŶŐĨŽƌĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐƚŚĂƚ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĂŝƌƋƵĂůŝƚLJ͘
'K>,tͬ
:– ϭϯ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞŐƌĞĞŶ͕ĂƚƚƌĂĐƚŝǀĞĂŶĚƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞƐƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŚĞĂůƚŚLJůŽĐĂů ĞĐŽŶŽŵLJ͕ƉƌŽƚĞĐƚĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞŶĂƚƵƌĂůĂŶĚďƵŝůƚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͕ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞĂŝƌƋƵĂůŝƚLJĂŶĚƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨůŝĨĞĨŽƌĂůů ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ ϭϯ͘ϭϬ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞ͕ĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚĂŶĚŚĂǀĞĂŵŝdž ŽĨƵƐĞƐ͕ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĞƌǀŝŶŐďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͕ǁŝƚŚŝŶǁĂůŬŝŶŐĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨŚŽŵĞƐĂŶĚǁŽƌŬƉůĂĐĞƐ͘ ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞ
ŵƵůƚŝͲŵŽĚĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚ͕ĂŶĚŚĂǀĞĂŵŝdž ŽĨƵƐĞƐ͘
KƉĞŶ^ƉĂĐĞĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ
dŚĞKƉĞŶ^ƉĂĐĞĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƚŚĞƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐĂŶĚĂĐƚŝŽŶƐƚŽƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĂŶĚĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞĂƌĞĂƐŝŶ ƚŚĞŝƚLJĂŶĚŵĞĞƚƚŚĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůŶĞĞĚƐŽĨŝƚƐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘KƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞƉĂƌŬƐ͕ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚƉƌŝǀĂƚĞůLJͲŽǁŶĞĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐ͕ƚƌĂŝůǁĂLJƐ͕ŐŽůĨĐŽƵƌƐĞƐĂŶĚŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞĞĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƐƌĂŶŐŝŶŐ ĨƌŽŵƉĂƐƐŝǀĞŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƚŽĂĐƚŝǀĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶƐŝƚĞƐ͘ ZĞůĞǀĂŶƚŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ 'K>K^ΘZ– ϭWƌŽǀŝĚĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶͬƉĂƌŬĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĨŽƌĂůůƚŚŽƐĞǁŚŽůŝǀĞĂŶĚǁŽƌŬŝŶWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJK^ΘZͲ ϭ͘Ϯ͗ƌĞĂƚĞĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĂŶĂŶŶƵĂůŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞƉůĂŶƚŚĂƚǁŝůůĞŶƐƵƌĞĂůůŽĨƚŚĞĐŝƚLJƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂƌĞĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞ͕ƐĂĨĞ͕ĂŶĚƵƐĞĂďůĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘&ŽĐƵƐŽŶŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ƌĞŶŽǀĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƵƉŐƌĂĚĞƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶŶĞĞĚƐŽĨĂůůƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĂƌĞŵĞƚ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJK^ΘZͲ ϭ͘ϯ͗WůĂŶƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚĞǀĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚƵƚŝůŝnjĞŽƵƌŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƚŽ ƚŚĞŵĂdžŝŵƵŵĞdžƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJK^ΘZͲ ϭ͘ϴ͗
ǀĂůƵĂƚĞĂŶĚ͕ǁŚĞƌĞĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͕ƵƚŝůŝnjĞƚŚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐŽĨĨĞƌĞĚďLJĂďĂŶĚŽŶĞĚƌŽĂĚĂŶĚƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚ ƌŝŐŚƚƐͲŽĨͲǁĂLJĂŶĚƐŝŵŝůĂƌĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůůLJŝŵƉĂĐƚĞĚŽƌƵŶƵƐĞĚůŝŶĞĂƌŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƚŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚůŽǁŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ ŐƌĞĞŶďĞůƚƐĂŶĚŵƵůƚŝͲƵƐĞƚƌĂŝůƐ͘
Appendices 180 Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϭϭ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ • WŽůŝĐLJK^ΘZͲ ϭ͘ϭϭ͗ƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĐĐƵƌƐ͕ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐĂƐŽŶĞŵĞĂŶƐĨŽƌŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŐƚŚĞŐŽĂůƐŽĨ ŽŵƉůĞƚĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJK^ΘZͲ ϭ͘ϭϮ͗ƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĐĐƵƌƐ͕ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJŝŬĞ >ŽŽƉ͘
'K>K^ΘZ– ϯ WƌĞƐĞƌǀĞŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƚŚĞŚŝŐŚƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨůŝĨĞŝŶWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJK^ΘZ– ϯ͘ϳ͗Conserve Placentia’s flood control facilities as appropriate to protect the public health, safety, ĂŶĚǁĞůĨĂƌĞĂŶĚĐƌĞĂƚĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐďŝŬĞƚƌĂŝůƐǁŚĞƌĞĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͘ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJWůĂŶ;ϮϬϮϯͿ
The ADA Transition Plan is used to document physical accessibility barriers to the City’s programs, services, and activities ĂŶĚƚŽŽƵƚůŝŶĞĂƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞͬƉůĂŶ;ŽƌƚŚĞďĂƐŝƐƚŽƉƌŽĚƵĐĞŽŶĞͿĨŽƌǁŚŝĐŚƚŚĞŝƚLJƐŚĂůůĨŽůůŽǁƚŽƚƌĂŶƐŝƚŝŽŶĨƌŽŵĂƐƚĂƚĞŽĨ ŶŽŶĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞƚŽĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞ͘
dŚŝƐƉůĂŶ͗
• /ĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐŝŶƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĞŶƚŝƚLJΖƐWƵďůŝĐZŝŐŚƚƐͲŽĨͲtĂLJƚŚĂƚůŝŵŝƚƚŚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJŽĨŝƚƐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐŽƌ ĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐƚŽŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐǁŝƚŚĚŝƐĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͖
• ƐƐĞƐƐĞƐƚŚĞĞdžƚĞŶƚŽĨĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽƉƌŽŐƌĂŵĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJŝŶƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚƐͲŽĨͲǁĂLJĂŶĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ƉĂƌŬƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐŽƉĞƌĂƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞŝƚLJ͖ • ĞƐĐƌŝďĞƐŝŶĚĞƚĂŝůƚŚĞŵĞƚŚŽĚƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůďĞƵƐĞĚƚŽŵĂŬĞƚŚĞWƵďůŝĐZŝŐŚƚƐͲŽĨͲtĂLJĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞ͖ •
ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐĐŽƐƚƐĨŽƌŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶƐ͖
• ^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĞƐƚŚĞƐƚĞƉƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞ͖
• WƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĨŽƌďĂƌƌŝĞƌƌĞŵŽǀĂůͬŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ͖
• ^ĞƚƐƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌďĂƌƌŝĞƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ͖ĂŶĚ
• /ŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐƚŚĞŽĨĨŝĐŝĂůƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƉůĂŶ͘ The plan also scores each feature’s expected frequency of use and the barrier to implementation to attempt to prioritize ĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůŚĂǀĞƚŚĞůĂƌŐĞƐƚŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂLJĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJĨŽƌƚŚŽƐĞǁŝƚŚĚŝƐĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ůĞŵĞŶƚhƉĚĂƚĞ;ϮϬϮϮͿ
dŚĞGeneral Plan Housing Element discusses how Yorba Linda will develop local housing programs to meet its “fair share” of ĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚĨƵƚƵƌĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐĨŽƌĂůůŝŶĐŽŵĞŐƌŽƵƉƐ͘dŚĞĐŚĂƉƚĞƌƐĞƚƐĨŽƌƚŚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƚŽĞŶĂĐƚůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉůĂŶƐĂŶĚ ƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJƐLJƐƚĞŵƐƚŚĂƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌ͕ĂŶĚĚŽŶŽƚƵŶĚƵůLJĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ dŚĞzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ůĞŵĞŶƚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐƚŚĂƚĨŽĐƵƐŽŶ͗ϭͿƉƌĞƐĞƌǀŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂŶĚ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͖ϮͿƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐŝƚĞƐ͖ϯͿĂƐƐŝƐƚŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶŽĨĂĨĨŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͖ϰͿƌĞŵŽǀŝŶŐ ŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚĂůĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐƚŽŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚ͖ĂŶĚϱͿƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŶŐĨĂŝƌĂŶĚĞƋƵŝƚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘
Active Transportation Plan 181 Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϭϮ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ ^ŽŵĞƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚŐŽĂůƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
'K>ϯ– WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐŝƚĞƐƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐĂŶĚĂĐŚŝĞǀĞĂǀĂƌŝĞƚLJĂŶĚĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJŽĨ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJϯ͘ϭ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞƐŝƚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƚŚĂƚƌĞƐƉŽŶĚƐƚŽĚŝǀĞƌƐĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŶĞĞĚƐŝŶ ƚĞƌŵƐŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƚLJƉĞƐ͕ĐŽƐƚĂŶĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĞŵƉŚĂƐŝnjŝŶŐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŶĞĂƌƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƚŚĂƚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞ ǁĂůŬĂďŝůŝƚLJ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJϯ͘Ϯ͗ WƌŽǀŝĚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŽŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞŚŝŐŚĞƌĚĞŶƐŝƚLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚƌĂĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůůLJĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĂƌĞĂƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐ ^ĂǀŝZĂŶĐŚĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐĂƐĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJϯ͘ϯ͗WƵƌƐƵĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŽŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝŶƵŶĚĞƌƵƚŝůŝnjĞĚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŽƌĞƵƐĞĞdžĐĞƐƐŽƌ ŽďƐŽůĞƚĞĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĨŽƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘
'K>ϰ– ZĞĚƵĐĞŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐƚŽŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚǁŚŝůĞŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJϰ͘ϭ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞĨůĞdžŝďŝůŝƚLJŝŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞŶĞǁŵŽĚĞůƐĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚĞƐƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƚƌĂŶƐŝƚͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ůŝǀĞͬǁŽƌŬŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ŵŝĐƌŽƵŶŝƚƐ͕ĂŶĚĨůĞdžƐƉĂĐĞƚŽ ĂůůŽǁŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƚŽĂĚĂƉƚƚŽƚŚĞŶĞĞĚƐŽĨƚŚĞŽĐĐƵƉĂŶƚƐ
^ŽŵĞƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
ϴĂ͘>ŽƚŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶWƌŽŐƌĂŵ
dŚĞƐƵĐĐĞƐƐŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶƐĞǀĞƌĂůŽĨƚŚĞƌĞnjŽŶĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJƐŝƚĞƐǁŝůůďĞĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚƵƉŽŶĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ ŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƉĂƌĐĞůƐŝŶƚŽůĂƌŐĞƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐŝƚĞƐ͘tŚŝůĞƐŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƉĂƌĐĞůƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƐĞƌĞnjŽŶĞĂƌĞĂƐĂƌĞĂůƌĞĂĚLJ ƵŶĚĞƌĐŽŵŵŽŶŽǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉ͕ŵŽƐƚĂƌĞŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůůLJŽǁŶĞĚ͘dŚĞŝƚLJǁŝůůĐŽŶĚƵĐƚŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚƚŽƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŽǁŶĞƌƐŝŶƚŚĞƐĞĂƌĞĂƐ ƚŽŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJŵĞĂŶŝŶŐĨƵůŝŶĐĞŶƚŝǀĞƐƚŽĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞůŽƚĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚŝƐĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬ͕ǁŝƚŚŝŶŽŶĞLJĞĂƌ ŽĨ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ůĞŵĞŶƚĂĚŽƉƚŝŽŶ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJǁŝůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂ>ŽƚŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƚŽŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐŝŶĐĞŶƚŝǀĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐ͗ • Flexible development standards such as reduced setbacks, increased lot coverage, increased heights, reduced ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ
• Reduced fees
• Streamlined permit processing through administrative staff review hƉŽŶĂĚŽƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJǁŝůůǁŽƌŬŝŶƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉǁŝƚŚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŽǁŶĞƌƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƌĞĐĞƉƚŝǀĞƚŽůŽƚ ĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽĂƐƐŝƐƚƚŚĞŵŝŶĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƉĂƌĐĞůŵĞƌŐĞƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶĂƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚĂŶĚƚŝŵĞůLJŵĂŶŶĞƌ͘ ϭϱ͘DƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚWƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐWƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐ͘ dŚĞŝƚLJĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌŝƚƐZͲDͲϮϬĂŶĚZͲDͲϯϬŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJnjŽŶĞƐŝŶĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚĂŶƵƌďĂŶ ĚĞƐŝŐŶƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĞŝƌĐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚĚŝĚŶŽƚĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚŚĞĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞŵĂdžŝŵƵŵnjŽŶĞĚĚĞŶƐŝƚŝĞƐ͘/Ŷ ƚĂŶĚĞŵǁŝƚŚĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚŝŶŐƚŚĞŶĞǁŚŝŐŚĞƌĚĞŶƐŝƚLJnjŽŶŝŶŐ͕zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞĚƚŚĞƉƌŝŽƌŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůhƐĞ WĞƌŵŝƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚDƵůƚŝͲ&ĂŵŝůLJĞƐŝŐŶ'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƵƉĨƌŽŶƚĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƚŚĞĚĞƐŝƌĞĚƋƵĂůŝƚLJĂŶĚĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŽĨŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂŚĂƐĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚĂƌĞǀŝĞǁ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐǁŚŝĐŚĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞ͕ĂŶĚĚŽŶŽƚƐĞƌǀĞƚŽĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶ͕ƋƵĂůŝƚLJŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘
Appendices 182 Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϭϯ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ>ŽĐĂůZŽĂĚǁĂLJ^ĂĨĞƚLJWůĂŶ ;ϮϬϮϮͿ
The City of Yorba Linda’s Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) is a comprehensive plan that creates a framework to ƐLJƐƚĞŵŝĐĂůůLJŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJĂŶĚĂŶĂůLJnjĞƚƌĂĨĨŝĐƐĂĨĞƚLJƌĞůĂƚĞĚŝƐƐƵĞƐĂŶĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂŶĚĐŽƵŶƚĞƌŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ͘dŚĞ>Z^WĂŝŵƐ ƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞĨĂƚĂůĂŶĚƐĞǀĞƌĞŝŶũƵƌLJ;&н^/ͿĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĂƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞĚůŝƐƚŽĨŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚĐĂŶĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƐĂĨĞƚLJŽŶůŽĐĂů ƌŽĂĚǁĂLJƐ͘dŚĞ>Z^WƚĂŬĞƐĂƉƌŽĂĐƚŝǀĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŝŶŐƐĂĨĞƚLJŶĞĞĚƐ͘/ƚŝƐǀŝĞǁĞĚĂƐĂŐƵŝĚĂŶĐĞĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƚŚĂƚĐĂŶďĞ ĂƐŽƵƌĐĞŽĨŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŝĚĞĂƐ͘ dŚĞWůĂŶĂŶĂůLJnjĞƐĐƌĂƐŚĞƐĂŶĚƌŽĂĚǁĂLJƐĂĨĞƚLJĂƚĞĂĐŚŵĂũŽƌŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĂƌƚĞƌŝĂůŝŶ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂĂŶĚŵĂŬĞƐƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶƚŚĞĨŽƌŵŽĨĂƚƌĂĨĨŝĐƐĂĨĞƚLJƚŽŽůďŽdžƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐƚŚĞŝƐƐƵĞƐĂƚŵĂũŽƌƉƌŽďůĞŵ ĂƌĞĂƐ͘ ZĞůĞǀĂŶƚĨŝŶĚŝŶŐƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ • ďŽƵƚϱϮйŽĨ&н^/ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐŚĂǀĞŽĐĐƵƌƌĞĚĂƚŶŝŐŚƚ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚ͕sĂůůĞLJsŝĞǁǀĞŶƵĞ͕ĂŶĚ>ĂWĂůŵĂ ǀĞŶƵĞŚĂǀĞĂŚŝŐŚĞƌĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨŶŝŐŚƚƚŝŵĞĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ͕ĐŽŵƉĂƌĞĚƚŽŽƚŚĞƌƌŽĂĚƐŝŶzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ͘dŚŝƐŵĂLJ ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƚŚĂƚůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐĂƚƚŚĞƐĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐƐŚŽƵůĚďĞĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞĚƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞůƵŵĞŶůĞǀĞůƐĂƌĞĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞ͘ • &Žƌ&н^/ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ͕ϯϰйŽĨĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐǁĞƌĞďƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ͘dŚŝƐĐĂůůƐĨŽƌĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŶŐ ďƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞŚŝŐŚŝŶũƵƌLJ ŶĞƚǁŽƌŬĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞŝƚLJǁŝƚŚƐŝŵŝůĂƌ ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ͘/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĂƚƚŚĞƐĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ ŵĂLJĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŽĨŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚƐŝŐŶĂůŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞͬůĂƌŐĞƌƐŝŐŶĂůŚĞĂĚƐ͕ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƉƌŽƚĞĐƚĞĚůĞĨƚƚƵƌŶƉŚĂƐĞ͕ĐŽŶǀĞƌƚƐŝŐŶĂůƚŽŵĂƐƚĂƌŵ;ĨƌŽŵƉĞĚĞƐƚĂůͲŵŽƵŶƚĞĚͿ͕ƌĂŝƐĞĚŵĞĚŝĂŶƐĂƚƚŚĞ ĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƐ͘
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗ŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ;ϮϬϭϲͿ
dŚĞŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬĨŽƌĂĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵĨŽƌƚŚĞ ŝƚLJƚŚĂƚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƐƚŚĞƐĂĨĞ͕ĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚƌĞůŝĂďůĞŵŽǀĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƉĞŽƉůĞĂŶĚŐŽŽĚƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘dŚĞĐŚĂƉƚĞƌ ĚĞĨŝŶĞƐƚŚĞŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŽĨƚŚĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵĂŶĚ ŵĂdžŝŵŝnjĞĨƌĞĞĚŽŵŽĨǀĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌŵŽǀĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŵŽǀĞŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ /ŶƚŚĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂƵƐĞƐĂĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůĐůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚĐůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵƐƵƐĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘/ƚ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚĐůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͗^ŵĂƌƚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕DĂũŽƌ͕WƌŝŵĂƌLJ͕^ĞĐŽŶĚĂƌLJ͕ŽůůĞĐƚŽƌ͘ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂĂůƐŽŚĂƐĂŶĞƚǁŽƌŬŽĨĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĞdžƚĞŶƐŝŽŶƐ͘
Active Transportation Plan 183 Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϭϰ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ dŚĞŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚůĂLJƐŽƵƚĂƐĞƌŝĞƐŽĨŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵǁŝƚŚŝŶzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ͘ ^ŽŵĞƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
'K>ZͲϯ– ŶĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵƚŚĂƚƵƚŝůŝnjĞƐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĚĞŵĂŶĚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJZͲϯ͘ϰ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞĞŵƉůŽLJĞƌƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐƵďƐŝĚŝĞƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞǁŽƌŬƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞƐ͕ ƌŝĚĞƐŚĂƌŝŶŐ͕ƚĞůĞĐŽŵŵƵƚŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚǁŽƌŬͲĂƚͲŚŽŵĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ĞŵƉůŽLJĞĞĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚƉƌĞĨĞƌĞŶƚŝĂůƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĨŽƌ ĐĂƌƉŽŽůƐͬǀĂŶƉŽŽůƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJZͲϯ͘ϲ͗ WƌŽŵŽƚĞƚŚĞƌĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƐŝŶŐůĞŽĐĐƵƉĂŶƚǀĞŚŝĐůĞƚƌŝƉƐ͕ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĚĞŵĂŶĚ ŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƐƵĐŚĂƐƌŝĚĞƐŚĂƌŝŶŐ͕ƚĞůĞĐŽŵŵƵƚŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJZͲϯ͘ϴ͗
ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŶŽŶͲ ǀĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂWĂƌŬƐĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ;ϮϬϭϰͿ
dŚĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂWĂƌŬƐĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŝƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂǀŝƐŝŽŶĨŽƌƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞ͕ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌŝŶŐ ƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶŽĨĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƚŚĞƚŽƚĂůƉĂƌŬƐĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶŶĞĞĚƐĂŶĚĚĞƐŝƌĞƐŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞƉůĂŶŐƵŝĚĞƐ ĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬŝŶŐƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐ ƉŽůŝĐLJĂŶĚĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂŶŝŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJĂŶĚĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŽĨƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞŽĨĨĞƌŝŶŐƐ͕ ŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ͕ĂŶĚĐĂƉŝƚĂůŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽďĞŵĂĚĞŽǀĞƌƚŚĞŶĞdžƚƚǁĞŶƚLJLJĞĂƌƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƚŚĞƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨ ůŝĨĞŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘dŚĞƉůĂŶĂůƐŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂŶĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŽĨĞƋƵĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŶĞĞĚƐĂŶĚŽƉƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐĨƵƚƵƌĞĞƋƵĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘
dŚĞƉůĂŶůĂLJƐŽƵƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌƉĂƌŬƐĂŶĚƚƌĂŝůƐǁŝƚŚŝŶzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ͘^ŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌƚƌĂŝůƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ Ϯ͘ϱ͘ϮĞdƌĂŝů^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ– dŚĞŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨdƌĂŝůƐĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞƐĂĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞĚƐLJƐƚĞŵŽĨƌŝĚŝŶŐĂŶĚŚŝŬŝŶŐ ƚƌĂŝůƐĂŶĚďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐ͘dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞƐƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌƚŚĞǀĂƌŝŽƵƐƚLJƉĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŝůƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ͗ •
ĂƌƚŚĞŶDƵůƚŝƉƵƌƉŽƐĞdƌĂŝůƐͲ^ŽĨƚƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƐŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚĨŽƌƵƐĞďLJĞƋƵĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ŚŝŬĞƌƐ͕ũŽŐŐĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚƐŽŵĞŵŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ ďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐǁŚĞƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ͘
• WĂǀĞĚDƵůƚŝƉƵƌƉŽƐĞdƌĂŝůƐͲdƌĂŝůƐĨŽƌŵƵůƚŝƉůĞƵƐĞƌƐ;ŚŝŬĞƌƐ͕ũŽŐŐĞƌƐ͕ĞƋƵĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ ďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐͿƚŚĂƚĚŽŶŽƚŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌŝůLJ ŵĞĞƚůĂƐƐ/ŝŬĞǁĂLJƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐďĞĐĂƵƐĞŽĨǀĂƌLJŝŶŐǁŝĚƚŚƐĂŶĚƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƐ͘ • WĂǀĞĚdƌĂŝůƐ;ůĂƐƐ/ŝŬĞǁĂLJͿͲWĂǀĞĚƉĂƚŚƐŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚƉƌŝŵĂƌŝůLJĨŽƌƵƐĞďLJďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ƚŚŽƐĞŝŶ ǁŚĞĞůĐŚĂŝƌƐĂŶĚƚŚŽƐĞǁŝƚŚƐƚƌŽůůĞƌƐ͘
• ŝŬĞ>ĂŶĞƐ;ůĂƐƐ//ŝŬĞǁĂLJͿͲ^ƚƌŝƉĞĚ͕ƐƚĞŶĐŝůĞĚĂŶĚƐŝŐŶĞĚůĂŶĞƐŽŶƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŽƌŚŝŐŚǁĂLJƐĨŽƌƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨďŝĐLJĐůĞƐ͘ • ŝŬĞZŽƵƚĞƐ;ůĂƐƐ///ŝŬĞǁĂLJͿͲ^ŝŐŶĞĚƌŽƵƚĞƐĂůŽŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŽƌŚŝŐŚǁĂLJƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞƐƐŚĂƌĞƚƌĂǀĞůůĂŶĞƐǁŝƚŚŵŽƚŽƌ ǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐ͘
Appendices 184 Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ ϭϱ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗ZŝĚŝŶŐ͕,ŝĚŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŬĞǁĂLJdƌĂŝůƐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚ;ϮϬϬϱͿ dŚĞƵƉĚĂƚĞƚŽƚŚĞDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨdƌĂŝůƐǁŽƌŬƐƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂƉůĂŶƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞŶĞƚǁŽƌŬŽĨƚƌĂŝůƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚzŽƌďĂ >ŝŶĚĂ͘
ƋƵĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ũŽŐŐĞƌƐ͕ŚŝŬĞƌƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐďŽƚŚŵŽƵŶƚĂŝŶĂŶĚƌŽĂĚ͕ĂŶĚƚŚŽƐĞǁŝƚŚƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJŶĞĞĚƐǁĞƌĞĂůů ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞƚŚĞĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚƚLJƉĞŽĨƚƌĂŝůƐĨŽƌĞĂĐŚƵƐĞƌ͘dŚĞƉůĂŶůĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͗ Ă͘ dŚĞŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝůƐŚŽƵůĚĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĞƚŚĞŝƚLJDĂŶĂŐĞƌƚŽϭͿĞĨĨĞĐƚƵĂƚĞƚŚĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞŵŝƐƐŝŶŐƚƌĂŝůůŝŶŬƐ͕ĂŶĚϮͿ ƚŽǁŽƌŬǁŝƚŚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŽǁŶĞƌƐƚŽŵĂŬĞĂĚũƵƐƚŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞƐƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞƚƌĂŝůǁŝĚƚŚƐ͕ĚĞƉĞŶĚŝŶŐƵƉŽŶƚŚĞ ĐŝƌĐƵŵƐƚĂŶĐĞƐƉĞƌƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚƚƌĂŝůĞůĞŵĞŶƚ͘
ď͘ dŚĞŝƚLJƐŚŽƵůĚĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚŝŶŐĂdƌĂŝůƐDĂŶĂŐĞƌƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌĞŶĨŽƌĐŝŶŐƚŚĞ dƌĂŝůƐDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶĂŶĚƚŚĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶĂƐŝƚƌĞůĂƚĞƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƚŚŝƐƚƌĂŝůƐƐƚƵĚLJ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌ ĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕WĂƌŬƐĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐdƌĂŝůƐŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘dŚĞdƌĂŝůƐDĂŶĂŐĞƌǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽ act as the City’s public relations officer as it relates to trails.
Đ͘ dŚĞŝƚLJƐŚŽƵůĚĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂŵĂƌŬĞƚŝŶŐĐĂŵƉĂŝŐŶƚŚĂƚŝŶĨŽƌŵƐƚŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐŽĨƚŚĞǀĂůƵĞŽĨƚŚĞƚƌĂŝů ƐLJƐƚĞŵ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƚŚĞŵǁŝƚŚĂƵƐĞƌͲfriendly map that is printed or accessible via the City’s website.
Active Transportation Plan 185 Appendices
Appendix B: Suitability Analysis
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 1 City of Yorba Linda; City of Placentia To: Cities of Yorba Linda, CA and Placentia, CA
From: Ryan Johnson; Alta Planning + Design
Date: 10/24/2023
Re: Land Use Suitability Analysis
Land Use Suitability Analysis
Background and Scope
Alta has identified potential areas where easements could be implemented to extend existing trails or create new trails utilizing proximity to common destinations and environmental variables included in the land use data. Alta will focus our field work on identifying potential locations for future local multipurpose trails (recreational biking or walking, hard surface or soft surface); or even future equestrian trails (earthen / soft surface).
Suitability Analysis
Data
Alta utilized the following GIS data in the suitability analysis to identify key corridors for active travel. • Existing & Proposed bike/ped facilities (SCAG)
• Land Use (SCAG) 2019 – updated to 2021
• Commercial Districts (Alta-generated, using Overture data and Parcel land use type), 2023 • Libraries (Alta)
• City Halls (Alta)
• Schools (CSCD)
• Open Space / Parks (SCAG)
Analysis
Alta created a suitability score based on both the distance of parcels from destinations such as commercial district area edges, libraries, schools, city halls, parks; proximity to disadvantaged communities; as well as environmental data available within the existing parcel dataset.
For this suitability score, lower values are better. The distance to different destinations was calculated and recorded in the data, then combined and ranked as percentiles. Parcels in the lowest percentile groups received fewer points to create a Distance Score.
Environmental data within the parcel dataset and the associated scores for each variable are shown in Table 1. Again, lower scores are better in this case. Total points for the environment were combined and ranked as percentiles. Parcels in the lowest percentile groups received fewer points to create an overall Environmental Score.
Next, distance from census tracts designated by the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) as disadvantaged communities was also included in the analysis. The distance to these communities for each parcel was calculated and recorded in the data, then combined and ranked as percentiles. Parcels in the lowest percentile groups received fewer points to create a Disadvantage Score.
Appendices 186 Yorba Linda-Placentia
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 2 City of Yorba Linda; City of Placentia The distance, environmental and disadvantage scores were combined for a final Total Suitability Score. This score was then symbolized and overlayed with existing trails, proposed trails and layer of parcels symbolized by ownership. This allowed Alta planners to visually inspect and prioritize corridors that create logical paths to connect trail gaps.
Table 1. Scores for Parcels intersecting various environmental factors, SCAG 2021 data
VARIABLE DESCRIPTION POINTS
FIRE Parcel intersects CalFire Very High Hazard Local Responsibility Areas or State Responsibility Areas (November 2020 version) (CalFIRE)
0 FLOOD Parcel intersects with a FEMA 100 Year Flood Plain data from the Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM), obtained from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in August 10, 2017
1 EQUAKE Parcel intersects with an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (California Geological Survey; 2018)
0 LIQUAFA Parcel intersects with a Liquefaction Susceptibility Zone (California Geological Survey; 2016) 3 LANDSLIDE Parcel intersects with a Landslide Hazard Zone (California Geological Survey; 2016) 2 CPAD Parcel intersects with a protected area from the California Protected Areas Database(CPAD) – www.calands.org (accessed April 2021)
0 WILDLIFE Parcel intersects with wildlife habitat (US Fish & Wildlife ServiceCritical Habitat, Southern California Missing Linkages, Natural Lands & Habitat Corridors from Connect SoCal, CEHC Essential Connectivity Areas,Critical Coastal Habitats) 3 CNDDB The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB)includes the status and locations of rare plants and animals in California. Parcels that overlap locations of rare plants and animals in California from the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB)have a greater likelihood of encountering special status plants and animals on the property, potentially leading to further legal requirements to allow development (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). Data accessed in October 2020.
2 HCPRA Parcel intersects Natural Community & Habitat Conservation Plans Reserve Designs from the Western Riverside MHSCP, Coachella Valley MHSCP, and the Orange County Central Coastal NCCP/HCP, as accessed in October 2020
1 WETLAND Parcel intersects a wetland or deepwater habitat as defined by the US Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory, Version 2.
2
Active Transportation Plan 187 Appendices
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 3 City of Yorba Linda; City of Placentia Results
Parcels across the cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia were scored for potential active travel corridors. This analysis assumes that the overall Destination Distance Score, Environment Score and Disadvantage Scores should be weighted equally.
Next Steps
These initial corridors can be used by the project team as potential areas to prioritize for fieldwork. Further discussion with the client about the nature of some of the publicly-owned parcels as well as which planned facilities are near term could indicate which specific corridors are examined in field review.