2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 12
(i) The retroactive date of the policy must be shown and must be no later than the commencement of the Services.
(ii) If coverage is canceled or not renewed and it is not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date that precedes the Effective Date of this Agreement, Contractor must provide extended reporting coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after the expiration or termination of this Agreement or the completion of the Services. Such continuation coverage may be provided by one of the following: (1) renewal of the existing policy; (2) an extended reporting period endorsement; or (3) replacement insurance with a retroactive date no later than the commencement of the Services under this Agreement. City shall have the right to exercise, at Contractor’s sole cost and expense, any extended reporting provisions of the policy, if Contractor cancels or does not renew the coverage. (iii) A copy of the claim reporting requirements must be submitted to City prior to the commencement of the Services under this Agreement.
4.4 Pollution Liability Insurance. Contractor, at its own expense, shall maintain pollution liability insurance written on a per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. The policy of insurance shall be in an amount not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) per pollution incident and ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) in the general aggregate. The policy shall apply to any incidents at or from any location on which Contractor performs the Services under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least one (1) year following the completion of Contractor’s services or the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
4.5 All Policies Requirements.
a. Verification of Coverage. Prior to beginning the Services under this Agreement, Contractor shall furnish City with certificates of insurance, additional insured endorsement or policy language granting additional insured status complete certified copies of all policies, including complete certified copies of all endorsements. All copies of policies and certified endorsements shall show the signature of a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificate of insurance must include the following reference: FY 24-25 ANNUAL PAVEMENT PRESERVATION PROJECT (ZONE 7). The name and address for additional insured endorsements, certificates of insurance and notice of cancellation is: City of Yorba Linda, 4845 Casa Loma Ave, Yorba Linda, CA 92886. City must be endorsed as an additional insured for liability arising out of ongoing and completed operations by or on behalf of Contractor. b. Notice of Reduction in or Cancellation of Coverage. Contractor shall provide written notice to City within ten (10) working days if: (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; or (3) the deductible or self insured retention is increased. In the event any of said policies
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 13
of insurance are cancelled, Contractor shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with this Section 4 to the Contract Administrator. c. Additional Insured; Primary Insurance. City and its officers, employees, agents, and authorized volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to each of the following: liability arising out of the Services performed by or on behalf of Contractor, including the insured’s general supervision of Contractor; products and completed operations of Contractor, as applicable; premises owned, occupied, or used by Contractor; and automobiles owned, leased, or used by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City or its officers, employees, agents, or authorized volunteers. The insurance provided to City as an additional insured must apply on a primary and non-contributory basis with respect to any insurance or self-insurance program maintained by City. Additional insured status shall continue for one (1) year after the expiration or termination of this Agreement or completion of the Services.
A certified endorsement must be attached to all policies stating that coverage is primary insurance with respect to City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, and that no insurance or self-insurance maintained by City shall be called upon to contribute to a loss under the coverage. The insurer is deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against City, its officers, employees, agents, authorized volunteers, and their respective insurers. d. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Contractor shall obtain the written approval of City for the self-insured retentions and deductibles before beginning any of the Services. During the term of this Agreement, only upon the prior express written authorization of the Contract Administrator, Contractor may increase such deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to City, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. The Contract Administrator may condition approval of an increase in deductible or self-insured retention levels with a requirement that Contractor procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses that is satisfactory in all respects to each of them. e. Subcontractors. Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.
f. Variation. The Contract Administrator may, but is not required to, approve in writing a variation in the foregoing insurance requirements, upon a determination that the coverage, scope, limits, and forms of such insurance are either not commercially available, or that City’s interests are otherwise fully protected.
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 14
4.6 Payment and Performance Bonds. Concurrently with execution of this Agreement, Contractor shall deliver to City a payment (labor and materials) bond and a performance bond, each in the sum of the amount of this Agreement, in the forms provided by the City Clerk, which secure the faithful performance of this Agreement. The bonds shall contain the original notarized signature of an authorized officer of the surety and affixed thereto shall be a certified and current copy of his power of attorney. The bonds shall be unconditional and remain in force during the entire term of this Agreement and shall be null and void only if Contractor promptly and faithfully performs all terms and conditions of this Agreement. Payment and performance bonds shall be secured from a surety company rated Grade “A” or better in the most recent edition of Best Rating Guide, The Key Rating Guide, or in the Federal Register, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless such requirements are waived by the Contract Administrator due to unique circumstances, and shall be authorized to write such bonds in the State of California. Contractor shall pay all bond premiums, costs, and incidentals.
Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 22300, substitution of eligible equivalent securities for any moneys withheld to ensure performance under this Agreement may be permitted at the request and expense of Contractor. Without limiting the foregoing, Contractor understands that Civil Code Section 9550 requires a payment bond for all public works contracts involving an expenditure of more than Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000).
4.7 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies at law or equity City may have if Contractor fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option, exercise any of the following remedies, which are alternatives to other remedies City may have and are not the exclusive remedy for Contractor’s breach:
a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement; b. Order Contractor to stop work under this Agreement or withhold any payment that becomes due to Contractor hereunder, or both stop work and withhold any payment, until Contractor demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; and/or c. Terminate this Agreement.
SECTION 5. INDEMNIFICATION.
5.1 Indemnification for Professional Liability. Where the law establishes a professional standard of care for performance of the Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless City and any and all of its officers, employees, officials, volunteers, and agents from and against any and all claims, losses, costs, damages, expenses, liabilities, liens, actions, causes of action (whether in tort, contract, under statute, at law, in equity, or otherwise) charges, awards, assessments, fines, or penalties
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 15
of any kind (including costs and expenses incurred by City and reasonable consultant and expert fees and expenses of investigation, costs of whatever kind and nature and, if Contractor fails to provide a defense for City, the legal costs of counsel retained by City) and any judgment (collectively, “Claims”) to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error, or omission of Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contractor shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement.
5.2 Indemnification for Other than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless City, and any and all of its officers, employees, officials, volunteers, and agents from and against any and all Claims, where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contractor or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor. Contractor will promptly pay any judgment rendered against City, its officers, agents, or employees for any such Claims arising out of or in connection with the performance of or failure to perform such Services, operations or activities of Contractor hereunder.
5.3 Subcontractors. Contractor shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors. Contractor shall be fully responsible to indemnify City, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof.
5.4 Limitation of Indemnification. The provisions of this Section 5 do not apply to claims occurring as a result of City’s sole or active negligence. The provisions of this Section 5 shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officers, officials, employees, and agents acting in an official capacity. In the event any applicable law contains a limitation on indemnification under this Agreement, such limitation shall supersede the provisions herein only to the extent required by said law.
SECTION 6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right to control Contractor only insofar as the results of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement and assignment of personnel pursuant to Subsection 1.4; however, otherwise City shall not have the right to control the means by which Contractor accomplishes the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. The personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it is or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers, officials, employees, or agents of City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. Except for
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 16
the fees paid to Contractor as provided in this Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing the Services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing the Services hereunder. Notwithstanding any other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Contractor and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing services under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System (“PERS”) as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. Contractor shall perform all Services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role.
City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Contractor in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Contractor.
SECTION 7. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.
7.1 Governing Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement.
7.2 Compliance with Applicable Laws. Contractor and any subcontractor shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations applicable to the performance of the work hereunder. Contractor shall not hire or employ any person to perform work within City or allow any person to perform the Services required under this Agreement unless such person is properly documented and legally entitled to be employed within the United States. Contractor acknowledges and agrees that it shall be independently responsible for reviewing the applicable laws and regulations and effectuating compliance with such laws. Contractor shall require the same of all subcontractors.
7.3 Prevailing Wages. Contractor acknowledges and agrees that it shall be independently responsible for reviewing the applicable prevailing wage laws and regulations and effectuating compliance with such laws, including, but not limited to the prevailing wage and related requirements set forth in this Subsection 7.3. Contractor shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law and/or the implementation of California Labor Code Section 1781, as the same may be amended from time to time, and/or any other similar law. a. Public Work. Contractor hereby expressly acknowledges and agrees that City has never previously affirmatively represented to Contractor, its employees or agents in writing or otherwise that the Services are not a “public work,” as defined in Section 1720 of the California Labor Code. It is agreed by the Parties that, in connection with the development, construction (as defined by applicable law) and
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 17
operation of the Services, including, without limitation, any public work (as defined by applicable law), if any, Contractor shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of state and/or federal prevailing wages and/or the implementation of California Labor Code Sections 1726 and 1781, as the same may be enacted, adopted or amended from time to time, and/or any other provision of law. To the extent applicable, City will enforce all penalties required by law for Contractor’s failure to pay prevailing wages. b. California Labor Code. The Contractor’s attention is directed to Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 of the California Labor Code and especially to Article 2 (Wages); and Article 3 (Working Hours), thereof.
(i) In accordance with Sections 1773 and 1773.2 of the California Labor Code, City has found and determined the general prevailing rates of wages in the locality in which the public work is to be performed are those determined by the Director of Industrial Relations and available at https://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/2022- 1/PWD/Southern.html. Copies of the prevailing rates of wages are maintained with City’s principal office and are available to any interested party on request. Contractor shall post a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages at each job site. (ii) Contractor is aware of and will comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1776, including the keeping of payroll records and furnishing certified copies thereof in accordance with said Section. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1771.4, Contractor must submit certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner using the Department of Industrial Relations’ electronic certified payroll reporting (eCPR) system.
(iii) Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1810, it is stipulated hereby that eight (8) hours labor constitutes a legal day’s work hereunder. (iv) Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1815, work performed by employees of contractors in excess of eight (8) hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week, shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day at not less than 1 ½ times the basic rate of pay.
(v) Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1813, it is stipulated hereby that Contractor shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by Contractor or by any subcontractor hereunder for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one (1) calendar week in violation of the provisions of Article 3 (commencing with Section 1810), Chapter 1, Part 7, Division 2 of the California Labor Code. (vi) Contractor is aware of and will comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 with respect to the employment of
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 18
apprentices. Pursuant to Section 1777.5 it is hereby stipulated that Contractor will be responsible for obtaining compliance therewith on the part of any and all sub-consultants or subcontractors employed by Contractor in connection with this Agreement. (vii) Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1775, it is hereby stipulated that Contractor shall, as a penalty to City, forfeit not more than two-hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for the Services by Contractor or any sub-consultant or subcontractor.
c. Bidding Eligibility. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1771.1, no contractor or subcontractor (or consultant or subconsultant) may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 6109, Contractor may not perform any Services hereunder with a subcontractor who is ineligible to perform the Services pursuant to Section 1777.1 or 1777.7 of the California Labor Code.
d. DIR Monitoring. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1771.4, Contractor is hereby notified that this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
e. Indemnification Related to Prevailing Wages. Section 5, Indemnification, specifically encompasses Claims arising from or related to (i) the noncompliance by Contractor or any party performing the Services of any applicable local, state, and/or federal law, including, without limitation, any applicable federal and/or state labor laws (including, without limitation, the requirement to pay state prevailing wages and hire apprentices); (ii) the implementation of California Labor Code Sections 1726 and 1781, as the same may be amended from time to time, or any other similar law; and/or (iii) failure by Contractor or any party performing the Services to provide any required disclosure or identification as required by California Labor Code Section 1781, as the same may be amended from time to time, and/or any other similar law.
7.4 Licenses and Permits, Fees, and Assessments. Contractor represents, warrants, and covenants to City that Contractor and its employees, agents, and any subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatsoever nature that are legally required to practice their respective professions, and perform the Services. Contractor represents, warrants, and covenants to City that Contractor and its employees, agents, and subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are legally required to practice their respective professions, and perform the Services.
In addition to the foregoing, Contractor and any subcontractors shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement valid business licenses from City. Contractor shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 19
and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for Contractor’s performance of the Services, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City, against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed, or imposed against City hereunder.
7.5 Conflicts of Interest. Contractor represents, warrants, and covenants that Contractor presently has no interest, direct or indirect, which would interfere with or impair in any manner or degree the performance of Contractor’s obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement. Contractor further agrees that while this Agreement is in effect, Contractor shall not acquire or otherwise obtain any interest, direct or indirect, that would interfere with or impair in any manner or degree the performance of Contractor’s obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement.
7.6 Unfair Business Practices Claims. In entering into this Agreement, Contractor offers and agrees to assign to City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials related to this Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time City renders final payment to Contractor without further acknowledgment of the Parties.
7.7 Annual Appropriation of Funding. In accord with Article 16 Section 18 of the California Constitution, payment of compensation under this Agreement is contingent upon annual appropriation of funds by City for that purpose. Contractor acknowledges and agrees that to the extent that the Services extend beyond one (1) fiscal year, payment for such Services is expressly conditioned on City’s annual appropriation of funds for such Services for each year. If no funds are appropriated then this Agreement shall be terminated. City pledges and agrees to process such appropriation requests annually and in good faith. Nothing in this Subsection shall be construed to limit the right of either Party to terminate this Agreement as provided herein.
7.8 Liquidated Damages. Since the determination of actual damages for any delay in performance of this Agreement would be extremely difficult or impractical to determine in the event of a breach of this Agreement, Contractor and its sureties shall be liable for and shall pay to City the sum of FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00) as liquidated damages for each working day of delay in the performance of any of the Services. City may withhold from any monies payable on account of the Services performed by Contractor any accrued liquidated damages.
SECTION 8. TERMINATION AND MODIFICATION.
8.1 Termination. City may terminate this Agreement at any time and without cause upon thirty (30) days’ written notification to Contractor. City may also terminate this Agreement pursuant to Subsection 8.8.
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 20
8.2 Termination by Contractor. Contractor may terminate this Agreement upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City.
8.3 Consequences of Termination. In the event of termination, Contractor shall be entitled to compensation for the Services satisfactorily performed up to the date of termination; City, however, may condition payment of such compensation upon Contractor delivering to City any or all materials provided to Contractor or prepared by or for Contractor or City in connection with this Agreement. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Contractor shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Administrator.
8.4 Administrative Change Orders. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the Services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to, or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written change order is first given by the Contract Administrator to Contractor, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the total compensation, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of Contractor. Any increase in compensation of up to five percent (5%) of the total compensation or TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($25,000), whichever is less; or in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days may be approved in writing by the Contract Administrator. Contractor understands and agrees that, if City grants an extension in time without additional work, City shall have no obligation to provide Contractor with compensation beyond the maximum amount provided for in this Agreement. Similarly, unless authorized by the Contract Administrator, City shall have no obligation to reimburse Contractor for any otherwise reimbursable expenses incurred during the extension period. All other extensions or modifications to this Agreement shall require a written amendment pursuant to Subsection 8.5.
8.5 Amendments. The Parties may amend this Agreement only by a writing signed by all the Parties. The Contract Administrator shall have the authority to execute amendments to this Agreement which do not materially change the terms hereof, in the Contract Administrator’s discretion, to the extent permitted by applicable federal, state, and local law. The Contract Administrator may refer any proposed amendment to the City Council for review and approval.
8.6 Assignment and Subcontracting. City and Contractor recognize and agree that this Agreement contemplates personal performance by Contractor and is based upon a determination of Contractor’s unique personal competence, experience, and specialized personal knowledge. Moreover, a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement was and is the professional reputation and competence of Contractor.
Contractor may not assign this Agreement or any interest therein without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator. Contractor shall not subcontract any portion of the performance contemplated and provided for herein, other than to the subcontractors noted in the Scope of Services, without prior written approval of the Contract
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 21
Administrator. In the event of any unapproved assignment, including in connection with any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved assignment shall release Contractor or any surety of Contractor of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.
8.7 Survival. All obligations arising prior to the expiration or termination of this Agreement and all provisions of this Agreement allocating liability between City and Contractor shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
8.8 Disputes, Default. In the event that Contractor is in default under the terms of this Agreement, City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any of the Services performed after the date of default. Instead, City may give notice to Contractor of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Contractor may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, in the sole discretion of the Contract Administrator. During the period of time that Contractor is in default, City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Contractor does not cure the default, City's remedies shall include, but not be limited to, any or all of the following:
a. Immediately terminate this Agreement;
b. Retain the plans, specifications, drawings, reports, design documents, and any other work product prepared by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement;
c. Retain a different contractor to complete the Services; and/or d. Charge Contractor the difference between the cost to complete the Services that is unfinished at the time of breach and the amount that City would have paid Contractor pursuant to Section 2 if Contractor had completed the Services.
Any failure on the part of City to give notice of Contractor’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.
8.9 Claims by Contractor. Claims, as that term is defined in California Public Contract Code Section 9204, by Contractor and, where applicable, any subcontractor, in connection with a public works project shall by subject to the mediation procedure in California Public Contract Code Section 9204.
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 22
SECTION 9. KEEPING AND STATUS OF RECORDS.
9.1 Documents and Data. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents, and other materials plans, drawings, estimates, test data, survey results, models, renderings, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings, digital renderings, or data stored digitally, magnetically, or in any other medium (the “Documents and Materials”) prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor, its employees, subcontractors, and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Administrator or upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, and Contractor shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the Documents and Materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed Documents and Materials for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by Contractor will be at City’s sole risk and without liability to Contractor, and Contractor’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, revise, or assignment. Contractor may retain copies of such Documents and Materials for its own use. Contractor shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any Documents and Materials prepared by them, and in the event Contractor fails to secure such assignment, Contractor shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom.
9.2 Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, rights of reproduction, and other intellectual property embodied in the Documents and Materials. Contractor shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for the Documents and Materials the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor has the legal right to license any and all of the Documents and Materials. Contractor makes no such representation and warranty in regard to the Documents and Materials which were prepared by design professionals other than Contractor or provided to Contractor by City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Materials at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.
9.3 Records. Contractor shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports (including but not limited to payroll reports), studies, or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and the Services performed hereunder (the “Books and Records”), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Administrator to evaluate the performance of such Services. Any and all such Books and Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Administrator
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 23
shall have full and free access to such Books and Records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such Books and Records. Such Books and Records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the Services hereunder, and City shall have access to such Books and Records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Contractor’s business, custody of the Books and Records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Contractor’s successor in interest. Under California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the amount of public funds expended under this Agreement exceeds TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00), this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement.
9.4 Reports. Contractor shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Administrator such reports concerning the performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Administrator shall require. Contractor hereby acknowledges that City is greatly concerned about the cost of the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Contractor agrees that if Contractor becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the Services contemplated herein or, if Contractor is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Contractor shall promptly notify the Contract Administrator of said fact, circumstance, technique, or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Contractor is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.
9.5 Confidentiality. City and Contractor agree that, until final approval by City, all data, plans, specifications, reports, and other documents are confidential and will not be released to third parties without prior written consent of both Parties unless required by law. Contractor, its officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Administrator or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories, or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. If Contractor, or any officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Contractor for any Claims caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor’s conduct.
Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions, or other discovery request, court order, or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the Services performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor or be present at any deposition, hearing, or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, this right to review any
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 24
such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered a voluntary disclosure so long as Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena as provided herein. Contractor understands and agrees that it may be required to provide documents to the City to be produced in response to a Public Records Act request.
SECTION 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
10.1 Attorneys’ Fees. If either Party to this Agreement brings any action, including an action for declaratory relief, to enforce or interpret the provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses including costs, in addition to any other relief to which that Party may be entitled; provided, however, that the attorneys’ fees awarded pursuant to this Subsection shall not exceed the hourly rate paid by City for legal services multiplied by the reasonable number of hours spent by the prevailing Party in the conduct of the litigation. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose.
10.2 Venue. In the event that either Party brings any action against the other under this Agreement, the Parties agree that trial of such action shall be vested exclusively in Riverside County.
10.3 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and all other parts of this Agreement shall nevertheless be in full force and effect.
10.4 Section Headings and Subheadings. The section headings and subheadings contained in this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the terms of this Agreement.
10.5 No Implied Waiver of Breach. Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a nondefaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.
10.6 Successors and Assigns. The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall apply to and bind the successors and assigns of the Parties.
10.7 Contractor Principals and Representatives. The following principals of Contractor (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 25
representatives of Contractor authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:
(Name) (Title)
(Name) (Title)
(Name) (Title)
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the Principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contractor and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. All personnel of Contractor, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Contractor without the express written approval of City.
10.8 City Contract Administration. This Agreement shall be administered by a City employee, Rick Yee, Deputy Director of Public Works/Assistant City Engineer (“Contract Administrator”). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the Contract Administrator or his designee. It shall be Contractor’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Administrator is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services and Contractor shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Administrator. Unless otherwise provided by applicable law, the Contract Administrator shall have the power to act on behalf of City for all purposes under this Agreement. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, Contractor shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the Contract Administrator or his designee.
10.9 Notices. Any written notice to Contractor shall be sent to:
Onyx Paving Company, Inc.
Attn: Corey R. Kirschner
2890 E. La Cresta Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92806
Any written notice to City shall be sent to the Contract Administrator at:
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 26
City of Yorba Linda
4845 Casa Loma Ave
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Attn: Rick Yee, Deputy Director of Public Works/Assistant City Engineer
with a copy to:
City Clerk
City of Yorba Linda
4845 Casa Loma Ave
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either Party desires or is required to give to the other Party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail. Either Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.
10.10 Rights and Remedies. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.
10.11 Integration, Interpretation. This Agreement, including Exhibits A and B, represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and Contractor and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral.
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.
10.12 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement.
10.13 Execution of Contract. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of each of the Parties hereto represent and warrant that (i) such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said Party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said Party is bound.
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 27
10.14 Nondiscrimination. Contractor covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that in the performance of this Agreement there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of any impermissible classification including, but not limited to, race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry. Contractor shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry.
10.15 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third-party beneficiaries under this Agreement and no such other third parties shall have any rights or obligations hereunder.
10.16 Nonliability of City Officers and Employees. No officer, official, employee, agent, representative, or volunteer of City shall be personally liable to Contractor, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Contractor or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.
10.17 No Undue Influence. Contractor declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure is used against or in concert with any officer or employee of City in connection with the award, terms or implementation of this Agreement, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of City shall receive compensation, directly or indirectly, from Contractor, or from any officer, employee, or agent of Contractor, in connection with the award of this Agreement or any work to be conducted as a result of this Agreement.
10.18 No Benefit to Arise to City Employees. No member, officer, or employee of City, or their designees or agents, and no public official who exercises authority over or has responsibilities with respect to this Agreement during his/her tenure or for one (1) year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in any agreement or subagreement, or the proceeds thereof, for the Services to be performed under this Agreement.
[Signatures on Following Page]
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
Contract Services Agreement | 28
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed and entered into this Agreement as of the Effective Date.
CITY OF YORBA LINDA
Dated: By:
MARK A. PULONE
CITY MANAGER
_____________________________
Sunny Han
Finance Director
ATTEST: ONYX PAVING COMPANY, INC.:
By:
Marcia Brown (Print)
City Clerk
(Signature)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RUTAN & TUCKER LLP Title: ____________________________
Dated:
Todd Litfin
City Attorney
By:
(Print)
(Signature)
Title: ____________________________
Dated:
NOTE: ALL SIGNATURES OF “CONTRACTOR MUST BE NOTARIZED. (IF CORPORATION, TWO NOTARIZED SIGNATURES – PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY –
AND CORPORATE SEAL OF CONTRACTOR REQUIRED)
2905/009410-1001
19412635.3 a05/28/25
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Services shall include FY 24-25 Annual Pavement Preservation Project (Zone 7) services, including labor, materials, services and equipment is the total amount of all lump sum items and of all unit price sums, determined by multiplying the unit price for each item times the actual quantity of each such item, in the amount not to exceed Two Million Seven Hundred Fifty-Four Thousand ($2,754,000) as further detailed in the attached pages (if any). If the Services include Services pursuant to a request for proposals or bid, the Services shall include the work contemplated by the entire “Bid Package” or “Request for Proposals” for the Services, including all plans, addenda, documentation, and specifications attached thereto. A copy of the Bid Package and/or Request for Proposals, as applicable shall be retained with a copy of this Agreement. Contractor shall keep a copy of the same for at least three (3) years following termination of this Agreement.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DATE: JUNE 3, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JAMIE LAI, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CITY ENGINEER PREPARED BY: ARMANDO JAIME, PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR CITYWIDE STREET STRIPING, PAVEMENT
MARKINGS, CURB PAINTING AND RELATED MAINTENANCE SERVICES TO J&S STRIPING COMPANY, INC.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Award the proposed three-year contract for citywide street striping, pavement markings, curb painting and related maintenance services to J&S Striping Company, Inc. in the amount not to exceed $692,409 ($230,803 annually) and reject all other bids, and,
2. Authorize expenditures for contract contingencies and potential additional services or unanticipated work performance that may arise, in an amount of $34,620.45 annually (15% of the contract amount) for the three-year term; and,
3. Authorize the City Manager on behalf of the Council to execute the proposed contract and potential future amendment or change orders within the designated contingency amount and approve contract renewals including any unit price increase(s) as provided within this agreement on behalf of the Council.
BACKGROUND
Historically, the City of Yorba Linda’s striping services, pavement markings, curb painting and related maintenance services have been performed by a qualified striping contractor that has secured the City’s striping contract through the City’s formal bidding procedures.
With the current striping contract expiration, staff developed and advertised a bidding package to secure a striping contractor. The striping contract typically is for the re-striping of areas that are not within the City’s annual pavement preservation program. Additionally, throughout the year there is additional striping that is installed and or modified.
The striping contract also proposes a three-year initial term but can be extended for no more than one additional two-year term at the sole discretion of the City providing for a potential term of five (5) years, offering vendors a longer term contract that allows them to purchase
A W A R D O F C O N T R A C T F O R C I T Y W I D E S T R E E T S T R I P I N G ,
P A V E M E N T M A R K I N G S , C U R B P A I N T I N G A N D R E L A T E D M A I N T E N A N C E S E R V I C E S T O J & S S T R I P I N G C O M P A N Y , I N C .
P A G E | 2
equipment with less risk and develop crew structures that can be stable and beneficial to the contractor and City’s striping needs.
DISCUSSION
Seven (7) bid proposals were received, and the bids were opened on May 2, 2025, with the following results:
Contractor City Bid Amount
J&S Striping Company, Inc. Ontario, Ca. $ 230,803
Superior Pavement Markings Cypress, Ca. $ 306,950
Estate Design & Construction, Inc. Culver City, Ca. $ 348,800 WGJ Enterprise Inc. DBA PCI Azusa, Ca. $ 501,030
Cat Tracking Inc. Riverside, Ca. $ 545,850
BC Traffic Specialists Garden Grove, Ca. $ 922,060
Safe USA Ontario, Ca. $1,385,350
Staff examined the bid proposals received and determined that the lowest responsible and responsive bidder is J&S Striping Company, Inc. J&S Striping Company, Inc., has performed these striping services for the City in the past. It is important to note that only work quantities performed by the contractor will be compensated for by the City as per the submitted bid proposal by the contractor.
FISCAL IMPACT
Sufficient funds are available under Account No.1010330-432450 to award the contract. In addition, funds will be included in the upcoming two-year budget to complete the term of this agreement.
ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may choose not to award the proposed striping services contract and reject all bids. But staff do not recommend this alternative because it will require the bidding process to restart the striping services. The bid proposal received from J&S Striping Company, Inc. is a competitive bid and there is no guarantee that re-advertising for these services will result in a lower bid.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 – J&S Striping Company, Inc. Bid Proposal
Attachment 2 – J&S Striping Company, Inc. Agreement
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DATE: JUNE 3, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JAMIE LAI, P.E., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER PREPARED BY: COLIN TSUI, P.E., ASSISTANT CIVIL ENGINEER SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-5941 ADOPTING THE CITY’S PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/2026 FUNDED BY SENATE BILL 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No. 2025-5941 adopting the City’s Project for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 funded by Senate Bill 1: Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.
BACKGROUND
On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act - Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) of 2017, which provided additional funding to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety needs on both state and local streets. A percentage of RMRA funds are apportioned on a formulaic basis to eligible cities and counties for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation and critical safety projects on the local street and road systems.
The California Transportation Commission (CTC) adopted a set of guidelines that requires cities to adopt their proposed projects into their Capital Improvement Programs (CIP) by resolution. The City must submit a project list, supporting documentation, and a resolution to the CTC no later than July 1st of each year to qualify for funding. The project being proposed for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2025/2026 is the Annual Pavement Preservation Program (APPP) Zone 7B and ADA Ramp Improvements Project.
DISCUSSION
The attached resolution contains project details that are required by CTC for transparency and accountability purposes. The balance of funds to construct the project will come from Gas Tax and Measure M2 Transportation funds. The budget amount currently programmed is approximately $5,000,000.00 for Fiscal Year 2025/2026. Staff continue to review the design progress and scope for the APPP projects to determine potential budgetary needs.
R E S O L U T I O N N O . 2 0 2 5 - 5 9 4 1 A D O P T I N G T H E C I T Y ’ S P R O J E C T F O R F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 2 5 / 2 0 2 6 F U N D E D B Y S E N A T E B I L L 1 : T H E R O A D R E P A I R A N D A C C O U N T A B I L I T Y A C T O F 2 0 1 7 P A G E | 2
FISCAL IMPACT
The project will be funded through a combination of transportation-related fund sources.
Based on distribution formulas, the City of Yorba Linda will receive an estimated $1,842,944 in RMRA funds in fiscal year 2025-26. In addition, the City has $62,123 in RMRA funding available from fiscal year 2024-25. Thus, the fund sources for the proposed project include $1,905,067.00 of RMRA funds (213), $1,477,251.00 of Gas Tax Funds (211), and $1,617,682.00 of Measure M2 Funds (212). The total proposed project cost for the APPP Zone 7B and ADA Ramp Improvements Project for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 is $5,000,000.00.
Funding for Fiscal Year 2025/26 will be programed in the Capital Improvement Account (4010050-461620) and a project number for the APPP Zone 7B, and ADA Ramp Improvements Project effort will be assigned during the forthcoming budget process.
ALTERNATIVES
Do not approve the resolution; however, substantial roadway-related funds could be forfeited because the City would not be following the required protocol to receive its annual RMRA fund allocation.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2025-5941
R E S O L U T I O N N O . 2 0 2 5 - 5 9 4 1
P A G E 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-5941
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF YORBA LINDA, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING THE CITY’S PROJECT FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2025-26 FUNDED BY
SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City of Yorba Linda are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City of Yorba Linda must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Yorba Linda, will receive an estimated $1,842,944 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2025-26 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the City of Yorba Linda already has $62,123 in RMRA funding on hand from Fiscal Year 2024-25; and
WHEREAS, this is the ninth year in which the City of Yorba Linda is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City of Yorba Linda to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the City of Yorba Linda used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and costeffective projects that also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment. The City of Yorba Linda is committed to maintenance of the road network and dedicates SB 1 funding to the Annual Pavement Preservation Program; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City of Yorba Linda maintain and rehabilitate streets/roads throughout the City this year and similar projects into the future. The
R E S O L U T I O N N O . 2 0 2 5 - 5 9 4 1
P A G E 2
City’s Annual Pavement Preservation Program is an essential part of the City’s ongoing street maintenance program. The APPP is a priority project and plays a crucial part in maintaining the City’s high pavement condition index; and
WHEREAS, the 2023 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City of Yorba Linda’s streets and roads are in an “good” condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into an improved condition; and
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive benefits.
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND by the Board of Supervisors/City Council of the City of Yorba Linda, State of California, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2. The following list of newly proposed projects will be funded in-part or solely with Fiscal Year 2025-26 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:
Fiscal
Year
Project Title RMRA
Funds
Other
Funds
Total
FY
2025/26
Annual Pavement Preservation
Program (APPP) Zone 7B and ADA
Ramp Improvements
$1,905,067 $3,094,933 $5,000,000
Annual Pavement Preservation Program (APPP) Zone 7B and ADA Ramp Improvements Project Description:
The City is divided into 7 zones and the program provides treatment of one zone per year whenever possible. This project continues with the streets that were deferred from the FY24-25 APPP. The project will utilize RMRA funds for the design and construction of various pavement maintenance and road rehabilitation treatments for streets that were deferred from the FY24-25 APPP. Construction generally includes crack sealing, slurry sealing, asphalt overlays/inlays, and miscellaneous asphalt repairs along with restriping of pavement markings.
Project Location:
Zone 7 is located on the southeasterly side of the City and is generally bounded by Yorba Linda/Weir Canyon Blvd to the west, La Palma Ave/Savi Ranch Parkway to the south, and City Limits to the north and east. This project will improve the residential streets on the Via Lomas de Yorba West/East loop.
R E S O L U T I O N N O . 2 0 2 5 - 5 9 4 1
P A G E 3
Proposed Schedule for Completion:
Design is scheduled to begin in October 2025 and is anticipated to conclude by February 2026. The proposed schedule is to award a construction contract by May 2026 and commence construction by June 2026.
Estimated Useful Life:
The basis of the Annual Pavement Preservation Program is to conduct preventative maintenance on a portion of the City’s roadway network each year. As pavement ages, it becomes more expensive to restore its condition and structural capacity. Therefore, the project provides for extension of pavement life and prolongs the more expensive roadway resurfacing treatments. The project provides for an average life extension of 5 to 7 years depending on the amount of traffic received on a particular street.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Yorba Linda this 3rd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:
_____________________________
JANICE LIM, MAYOR
CITY OF YORBA LINDA
ATTEST:
______________________________
MARCIA BROWN, CITY CLERK
CITY OF YORBA LINDA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
_______________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
R E S O L U T I O N N O . 2 0 2 5 - 5 9 4 1
P A G E 4
I, MARCIA BROWN, City Clerk of the City of Yorba Linda, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City of Yorba Linda held on the 3rd day of June, 2025 and was carried by the following roll call vote:
____________________________________
MARCIA BROWN, CITY CLERK
CITY OF YORBA LINDA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DATE: JUNE 3, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JAMIE LAI, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER PREPARED BY: MONSE GARCIA, MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: APPROVE RENEWAL AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE SERVICES WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PACKAGE G
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Approve an additional term renewal to the Maintenance Service Agreement (No. 21220067) with Nieves Landscape, Inc. (Nieves), for Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) Package G (Package G), to extend the term of the agreement for two years and increase compensation by 7.5% for a total of $758,167.03 for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 and 7.5% for a total of $815,029.56 for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 for a not-to-exceed total amount of $1,573,196.59; and
2. Authorize the City Manager, on behalf of Council, to execute the proposed amendment and change order approval authority to execute future contract modifications and contingency increases in amounts not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the annual approved agreement amounts for each respective fiscal year.
BACKGROUND
All publicly maintained landscaping and equestrian trails within Package G are maintained by the LMAD, as per the approved Fiscal Year 2024/25 Engineer’s Report. On August 6, 2019, the City Council awarded a Landscape and Equestrian Trail Maintenance contract for Package G – Vista Del Verde to Nieves Landscape, Inc. This agreement was awarded through a formal bidding process that complied with the City’s purchasing policy and California law. The agreement has been renewed and amended multiple times, utilizing Council-approved extensions and provisions for additional work. All allowable extensions have now been exhausted, with final expiration set for June 30, 2025.
A P P R O V E R E N E W A L A M E N D M E N T T O A G R E E M E N T F O R
L A N D S C A P E M A I N T E N A N C E S E R V I C E S W I T H I N L A N D S C A P E
M A I N T E N A N C E A S S E S S M E N T D I S T R I C T P A C K A G E G P a g e | 2
DISCUSSION
In advance of the upcoming expiration of the current maintenance agreement and given previous history of increased contract costs, discussions were undertaken with the existing contractor providing services for Maintenance Package G, Nieves. These discussions resulted in a renewal offer to extend the existing agreement by the contractor.
The City’s purchasing policy typically allows for agreements to span for a total of five years, inclusive of all renewal periods. However, provisions within the purchasing policy allow for exceptions to be made based upon a variety of factors. Pertinent to the current solicitation efforts for replacement services for this maintenance package, it is believed that allowing for targeted additional term extension of two years is in the best fiscal interest of the City and LMAD. In analyzing recent bids, some of which were as high as 48% higher, and the City’s other maintenance package costs, a 7.5% increase per year is a fiscally reasonable increase.
Therefore, staff recommend that Council approve a renewal extension to the existing agreement with Nieves in the amount shown in the table below:
Amendment No. TERM INCREASE AMOUNT
Initial Agreement September 1st, 2019 – August
31st, 2022 $1,754,661.00
Amendment No.1 September 1
st, 2022 – June 30th
,
2023
4.5% $509,339.10
Amendment No.2 July 1
st, 2023 - June 30th, 2024 4.9% $641,156.06
Amendment No.3 July 1st, 2024 – June 30th, 2025 10% $705,271.66 Amendment No.4 July 1st, 2024 – June 30th, 2025
(15% Contingency FY24/25) N/A $105,790.75
Amendment No.5
(Proposed)
July 1st, 2025 – June 30th, 2026 7.5% $758,167.03
Amendment No.5
(Proposed)
July 1st, 2026 – June 30th, 2027 7.5% $815,029.56
Not- to-Exceed Agreement Total Compensation $5,289,415.16
FISCAL IMPACT
Approving an additional two-year extension will significantly benefit the LMAD budget over the next two years compared to the potential cost increases with a new procurement.
Sufficient funding to accommodate the recommended renewal amendment, and contingency approval has been included in the LMAD Maintenance operating account (2010350-432950) within the proposed budget for Fiscal Years 2025/2026 and 2026/2027.
A P P R O V E R E N E W A L A M E N D M E N T T O A G R E E M E N T F O R
L A N D S C A P E M A I N T E N A N C E S E R V I C E S W I T H I N L A N D S C A P E
M A I N T E N A N C E A S S E S S M E N T D I S T R I C T P A C K A G E G P a g e | 3
ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may direct staff not to proceed with approval of the proposed renewal amendment, and conversely, pursue a rebidding of the services after reworking of the bid package specifications and criteria. This option is unlikely to yield a lower cost for the contract. This alternative would also require staff to engage the existing vendors to secure a month-to-month extension while the solicitation process is conducted.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 – Nieves Package G (Amendment No. 5)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: JUNE 3, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: NATE FARNSWORTH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
PREPARED BY: JEFF MCIVER, BUILDING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: DEMOLITION PERMIT REQUEST FOR 18597 AND 18602 ALTRUDY LANE (PHASE II OF THE ALTRUDY LANE SENIOR APARTMENTS).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council approve the demolition permit request for 18597 & 18602 Altrudy Lane.
BACKGROUND
The City has received a request to demolish (2) existing single-family dwellings located at 18597 & 18602 Altrudy Lane, in an effort to prepare for phase II of the Altrudy Lane Senior Apartments. The structure located at 18597 Altrudy Lane is an existing single-story 1,645 square foot residence with a 570 square foot detached garage, (4) bedrooms, and (2) bathrooms. The residence is wood framed with a stucco finish and is located on a 1-acre lot.
The structure located at 18602 Altrudy Lane is an existing single-story 1,395 square foot residence with a 780 square foot attached garage, (4) bedrooms, and (2) bathrooms. This address also has a swimming pool that will be included in the demolition. The residence is wood framed with a stucco finish and is located on a 1-acre lot. Both properties are connected to Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas, and on a septic system, which will be disconnected and properly backfilled. The applicant plans to submit construction documents to the City on June 3, 2025, for the Altrudy Lane Senior Apartments phase II. Demolition is not authorized until applicant owns the subject property.
DISCUSSION
In accordance with the City Council’s P-2 policy, the demolition permit has been analyzed to determine whether there is any historic significance with the existing properties. According to the 2010 Citywide Historic Resources Survey, the structures located 18597 & 18602 Altrudy Lane are not an eligible resource and do not possess any historical significance. The demolition request will be reviewed by the Engineering Division for compliance with storm water prevention and best management practices (BMPs). An asbestos survey was performed, and laboratory analysis revealed detectable levels of asbestos or assumed
DEMOLITION PERMIT REQUEST FOR 18597 AND 18602 ALTRUDY LANE (PHASE II OF THE
ALTRUDY LANE SENIOR APARTMENTS)
P a g e | 2
asbestos; appropriate abatement measures will be required, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District will be notified. A lead-based paint survey was performed and revealed several of the painted components indicated the presence of lead-based paint (LBP) at or above the action levels. The report recommends utilizing professionals that have experience working with LBP for removal.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
ALTERNATIVES
The City Council could deny the demolition permit request; however, there is no significant historical significance related to the property.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Applicant’s Demolition Request Letter
2. Applicant’s Demolition Plan Proposal
3. Site Aerial Photograph
4. Front Elevation Photograph
5. Asbestos Report, 18597 Altrudy Lane
6. Asbestos Report, 18602 Altrudy Lane
7. Lead Based Paint Report, 18597 Altrudy Lane
8. Lead Based Paint Report, 18602 Altrudy Lane
May 21, 2025
City of Yorba Linda
Building Division
4845 Casa Loma Ave
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
RE: Altrudy II DemoliGon Request -18597 & 18602 Altrudy Lane Yorba Linda Altrudy II LP is reques5ng approval to demolish the exis5ng homes and ancillary structures at 18597 & 18602 Altrudy Lane.
Exis5ng Structure Informa5on:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Existing square footage of:
1 story living area: 1,645 SF
Attached garage: 570 sf
Detached shed structure: 640 SF
Total square footage: 2,855 SF
Construction type: V-B
Number of stories: 1
Disturbed land: 2,000 SF
Historical significance: N/A
18602 Altrudy Lane
Existing square footage of:
1 story living area: 1,395 SF
Attached garage: 780 SF
Total square footage: 2,175 SF
Construction type: V-B
Number of stories: 1
Disturbed land: 8,000 SF
Historical significance: N/A
Please contact me at 619-846-3532 or at [email protected] with any ques5ons.
Thank you,
Mike VanBuskirk
REVISIONS
BASIS OF BEARING
BENCH MARK NO. DEVELOPER
SOILS ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
SHEET
OF 3
SITE DEMOLITION PLAN
ALTRUDY SENIOR APARTMENTS - PHASE II
18611 ALTRUDY LANE, YORBA LINDA, CA 92886
DMXX-XX
213.988.8802 fuscoe.com
600 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1470
Los Angeles, Ca 90017
VICINITY MAP
90 90
SHEET INDEX
SITE DEMOLITION PLANS
FOR
ALTRUDY SENIOR'S APARTMENT - PHASE II
18611 ALTRUDY LANE (FORMERLY 18597 & 18602 ALTRUDY LANE) 1 TITLE SHEET & GENERAL NOTES
CITY OF YORBA LINDA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GRADING NOTES (MODIFIED FOR DEMOLITION)
CITY OF YORBA LINDA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GENERAL NOTES
NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR
PROJECT TEAM UTILITY CONTACTS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BENCHMARK
FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:
ZONING:
SITE INFORMATION:
DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES
NTS
EROSION CONTROL FENCE DETAIL
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
05/21/25
E E E E E CATV CATV CATV CATV T T T T T
EV EV
PL
PL
PL
PL
ALTRUDY LANE
(PRIVATE)
LOT 9
TRACT NO. 8279
M.M 347/7-8
(NOT A PART)
TRACT NO.11548
M.M. 515/20-22
(NOT A PART)
INSTRUMENT NO.
20020841967, O.R.
(NOT A PART)
INSTRUMENT NO. 2012000024951,
O.R.
(NOT A PART)
INSTRUMENT NO. 93-0912261,
O.R.
(NOT A PART)
LOT 11
TRACT NO. 9258
M.M 381/45-46
(NOT A PART)
LOT 10
TRACT NO. 9258
M.M 381/45-46
(NOT A PART)
LOT 9
TRACT NO. 9258
M.M 381/45-46
(NOT A PART)
LOT 8
TRACT NO. 9258
M.M 381/45-46
(NOT A PART)
LOT 1
TRACT NO. 10999
M.M 499/1-3
(NOT A PART)
REVISIONS
BASIS OF BEARING
BENCH MARK NO. DEVELOPER
SOILS ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
SHEET
OF 3
SITE DEMOLITION PLAN
ALTRUDY SENIOR APARTMENTS - PHASE II
18611 ALTRUDY LANE, YORBA LINDA, CA 92886
DMXX-XX
213.988.8802 fuscoe.com
600 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1470
Los Angeles, Ca 90017
DEMOLITION NOTES
SITE DEMOLITION PLAN
2 LEGEND
05/21/25
EV EV ALTRUDY LANE
(PRIVATE)
PL
PL
PL
PL
LOT 11
TRACT NO. 9258
M.M 381/45-46
(NOT A PART)
LOT 10
TRACT NO. 9258
M.M 381/45-46
(NOT A PART)
LOT 9
TRACT NO. 9258
M.M 381/45-46
(NOT A PART)
LOT 8
TRACT NO. 9258
M.M 381/45-46
(NOT A PART)
LOT 1
TRACT NO. 10999
M.M 499/1-3
(NOT A PART) TRACT NO.11548
INSTRUMENT NO. 20020841967, O.R.
(NOT A PART)
INSTRUMENT NO. 2012000024951, O.R.
(NOT A PART)
INSTRUMENT NO. 93-0912261, O.R.
(NOT A PART)
REVISIONS
BASIS OF BEARING
BENCH MARK NO. DEVELOPER
SOILS ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
SHEET
OF 3
SITE DEMOLITION PLAN
ALTRUDY SENIOR APARTMENTS - PHASE II
18611 ALTRUDY LANE, YORBA LINDA, CA 92886
DMXX-XX
213.988.8802 fuscoe.com
600 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1470
Los Angeles, Ca 90017
EROSION CONTROL NOTES QUANTITYUNIT
EROSION CONTROL PLAN - DEMOLITION
3 LEGEND
A
A
NTS
GRAVEL BAG BERM
PAVED ROADWAY MATCH EXISTING GRADE
A
A
NTS
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT DETAIL
NTS
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
TYPICAL CURB SIDE INLET PROTECTION TYPICAL GRATE INLET PROTECTION 05/21/25
BARR & CLARK
Independent Environmental Testing
Asbestos • Lead • Mold • Phase I
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT
OF
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
18597 ALTRUDY LANE
YORBA LINDA, CA 92780
PROJECT NO. 3100457
DECEMBER 11, 2019
Prepared For:
C&C Development
14211 Yorba Street, Suite 200
Tustin, CA 92780
Inspected & Prepared By: Reviewed By:
Matthew Crochet Jeremy Nguyen
State of California State of California
Certified Asbestos Consultant Certified Asbestos Consultant
Asbestos Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18597 Altrudy Lane
Project No. 3100457 Page 2
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 3
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK......................................................................................................... 3
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 3
4.0 INSPECTOR’S QUALIFICATIONS............................................................................. 3
5.0 SAMPLING PROTOCOL / SAMPLE ANALYSIS ...................................................... 3
6.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS ........................................................................................... 4
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................ 4
8.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................... 5
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A LABORATORY RESULTS
APPENDIX B INSPECTOR’S CERTIFICATE(S)
APPENDIX C INSURANCE CERTIFICATE
APPENDIX D MAP(S)
Asbestos Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18597 Altrudy Lane
Project No. 3100457 Page 3
ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of Barr & Clark’s asbestos inspection of the Single Family Residence located at 18597 Altrudy Lane, Yorba Linda, California (Subject Property). This document is prepared for the sole use of C&C Development, the City of Yorba Linda and any regulatory agencies that are directly involved in this project. No other party should rely on the information contained herein without prior written consent of C&C Development. The scope of services, inspection methodology, and results are presented below.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The purpose of this inspection is to identify and assess certain accessible Asbestos Containing Construction Materials (ACCM) at the subject property.
On 12/5/2019, Barr & Clark performed an inspection for asbestos at the subject property in Yorba Linda, California. Physical bulk samples were collected of suspect materials from representative locations and submitted to an independent laboratory for analysis. If asbestos was detected at any concentration within a sample of a construction material, it was concluded that the material contains asbestos. Suspect materials were also visually inspected to assess their condition.
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The subject property is a single family residence that was built circa 1950. It is a one story building that is constructed over a raised foundation. The exterior walls are covered with stucco/ wood siding. The home consists of three bedrooms, two bathrooms, an attached garage, a detached shed and a chicken coop.
4.0 INSPECTOR’S QUALIFICATIONS
Matt Crochet of Barr & Clark performed the inspection at the site. Personnel certificate(s) have been provided in Appendix B.
5.0 SAMPLING PROTOCOL / SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sampling Protocol: Sampling was patterned after the Asbestos School Hazard Emergency Response Act (40 CFR 763 Subpart E) as mandated by Cal/OSHA (Title 8 Section 1529) and South Coast Air Quality Management District (Rule 1403).
Sample Analysis: Physical bulk samples were collected from this property and analyzed for asbestos content by an independent environmental laboratory which is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (Lab Code 200358-0). The method of analysis was 1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
Asbestos Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18597 Altrudy Lane
Project No. 3100457 Page 4
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
Polarized Light Microscopy (EPA 600/M4-82-020). Additional laboratory information can be found on the last page of the laboratory results (Appendix A).
6.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Asbestos Containing Construction Materials: Asbestos was detected in samples of several construction materials. The following summary identifies these materials, their location within the property, the condition in which they were observed at the time of inspection, approximate quantity of material and percentage of asbestos contained in the material as reported by laboratory analysis.
Material Sample # Location Condition Quantity* % Asbestos Exterior Stucco 1-5 Exterior Walls Throughout Damaged N/A <0.1%** See Note
Roofing Mastic 9-11
Roof at Penetrations and
All Like Roofing Mastic
Throughout
Damaged 20 S.F. 3%
Duct Insulation
Material
(Aircell)
Visual Heater Ducts and Registers
Throughout Damaged 500 S.F. Assumed
Asbestos Cement
Pipe(s) Visual Roof/Attic Good 30 S.F. Assumed
*NOTE: All quantification estimates are approximate and based on information and materials that were accessible at the time of inspection. The chosen contractor is solely responsible for verifying all final ACCM quantities for bidding, abatement, and disposal purposes. ***NOTE: Stucco sample results initially indicated an asbestos content of <1%. In an effort to verify asbestos content, these samples were re-analyzed utilizing a 1000-point point count method and found to have an asbestos content of less than or equal to 0.1%. Because the results were less than or equal to 0.1% the material may be treated as non asbestos containing material as defined by AQMD and OSHA.
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The analysis and recommendations submitted in this survey are based in part on the data obtained from specific and discrete sampling locations. However, the nature and extent of variations between the sampling locations may not become evident until renovation or demolition procedures commence. If potential variations (i.e. different building materials) are identified during renovation or demolition activities, it will be necessary to conduct additional bulk sampling.
ACCM in Damaged or Significantly Damaged Condition: These materials present the greatest risk for asbestos exposure. It is recommended that all damaged and/or significantly
Asbestos Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18597 Altrudy Lane
Project No. 3100457 Page 5
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
damaged asbestos containing construction materials be removed following SCAQMD Rule 1403 Procedure 5. An asbestos abatement contractor registered with the Division of Occupational Safety and Health must perform any work that disturbs these materials.
ACCM in Good Condition: No action is recommended for these materials. Asbestos containing materials that are maintained in good condition present minimal risk for asbestos exposure.
Note: If renovation or demolition activities are to affect these materials, an asbestos abatement contractor registered with the Division of Occupational Safety and Health should be contracted to perform all portions of the work affecting these materials.
8.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS
This inspection was planned, developed, and implemented based on Barr & Clark’s previous experience in performing asbestos inspections. Barr & Clark utilized state-of-the-art-practices and techniques in accordance with regulatory standards while performing this inspection. Barr & Clark’s evaluation of the relative risk of exposure to asbestos identified during this inspection is based on conditions observed at the time of the inspection. Barr & Clark cannot be responsible for changing conditions that may alter the relative exposure risk or for future changes in accepted methodology.
This inspection did not evaluate hidden, buried or unseen building or other materials. When future renovation or demolition activities are undertaken, Barr & Clark should be contacted if such are encountered for further evaluation. Any materials that were not sampled during the inspection must be presumed to contain asbestos until proven otherwise. Access and inspection of attics or crawl spaces could be limited due to visibility, obstructions, health and safety hazards or structural issues. All undocumented materials should be presumed to contain asbestos until sampled and analyzed.
Enclosed are the actual test results and all relevant certifications and licenses.
APPENDIX
A
(LABORATORY RESULTS)
LA Testing
5431 Industrial Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Tel/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944
http://www.LATesting.com / [email protected] LA Testing Order: 331925621
Customer ID: 32BACA26
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Attention: Matt Crochet Phone: (310) 760-2112
Barr & Clark, Inc. Fax:
16531 Bolsa Chica Street Received Date: 12/06/2019 8:30 AM Suite 205 Analysis Date: 12/10/2019 - 12/11/2019
Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Collected Date:
Project: 3100457/Single Family Residence/18597 Altrudy Lane, Yorba Linda, CA 92780 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
1-Finish Coat
331925621-0001
Brown 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
1-Stucco
331925621-0001A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
2-Finish Coat 1
331925621-0002
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
2-Finish Coat 2
331925621-0002A
Brown 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
2-Stucco
331925621-0002B
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
3-Finish Coat
331925621-0003
Brown 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
3-Stucco
331925621-0003A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
4-Finish Coat 1
331925621-0004
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
4-Finish Coat 2
331925621-0004A
Brown 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
4-Stucco
331925621-0004B
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
5-Finish Coat 1
331925621-0005
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
5-Finish Coat 2
331925621-0005A
Brown 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
5-Stucco
331925621-0005B
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
6 331925621-0006
Gray/Various/Black 6% Glass 94% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Roof - Roofing
7 331925621-0007
Gray/Various/Black 5% Glass 95% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Roof - Roofing
8 331925621-0008
Gray/Various/Black 6% Glass 94% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Roof - Roofing
Initial report from: 12/11/2019 12:20:18
ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/11/2019 9:20 AM Page 218 of 524 Page 1 of 4 LA Testing
5431 Industrial Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Tel/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944
http://www.LATesting.com / [email protected] LA Testing Order: 331925621
Customer ID: 32BACA26
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
9 331925621-0009
Gray/Black 97% Non-fibrous (Other) 3% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Roof @ penetrations -
Mastic
10 331925621-0010
Roof @ penetrations - Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
Mastic
11 331925621-0011
Roof @ penetrations - Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
Mastic
12-Skim Coat
331925621-0012
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Living room - Plaster
12-Plaster
331925621-0012A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Living room - Plaster
13-Skim Coat
331925621-0013
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 1 - Plaster
13-Plaster
331925621-0013A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 1 - Plaster
14-Skim Coat
331925621-0014
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 2 - Plaster
14-Plaster
331925621-0014A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 2 - Plaster
15-Skim Coat
331925621-0015
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bath 1 - Plaster
15-Plaster
331925621-0015A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bath 1 - Plaster
16-Skim Coat
331925621-0016
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 3 - Plaster
16-Plaster
331925621-0016A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 3 - Plaster
17-Vinyl Floor Tile
331925621-0017
Gray/White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Bed 1 closet -
Flooring
17-Mastic
331925621-0017A
Clear 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 1 closet -
Flooring
17-Leveler
331925621-0017B
White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 1 closet -
Flooring
18-Vinyl Floor Tile
331925621-0018
Gray/White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Bed 1 closet -
Flooring
18-Mastic
331925621-0018A
Clear 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 1 closet -
Flooring
18-Leveler
331925621-0018B
White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 1 closet -
Flooring
Initial report from: 12/11/2019 12:20:18
ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/11/2019 9:20 AM Page 219 of 524 Page 2 of 4 LA Testing
5431 Industrial Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Tel/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944
http://www.LATesting.com / [email protected] LA Testing Order: 331925621
Customer ID: 32BACA26
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
19-Vinyl Floor Tile
331925621-0019
Gray/White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Bed 2 closet -
Flooring
19-Mastic
331925621-0019A
Clear 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 2 closet -
Flooring
19-Leveler
331925621-0019B
White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 2 closet -
Flooring
20-Vinyl Floor Tile
331925621-0020
Gray/White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Bath 2 -
Flooring(12x12)
20-Mastic
331925621-0020A
Yellow 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bath 2 -
Flooring(12x12)
20-Leveler
331925621-0020B
White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bath 2 -
Flooring(12x12)
21-Vinyl Floor Tile
331925621-0021
Gray/White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Bath 2 -
Flooring(12x12)
21-Mastic
331925621-0021A
Yellow 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bath 2 -
Flooring(12x12)
21-Leveler
331925621-0021B
White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bath 2 -
Flooring(12x12)
22-Vinyl Floor Tile
331925621-0022
Gray/White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Bath 2 -
Flooring(12x12)
22-Mastic
331925621-0022A
Yellow 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bath 2 -
Flooring(12x12)
22-Leveler
331925621-0022B
White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bath 2 -
Flooring(12x12)
23-Vinyl Floor Tile
331925621-0023
Brown/Tan 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Bed 4 - Flooring
23-Mastic
331925621-0023A
Clear 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 4 - Flooring
24-Vinyl Floor Tile
331925621-0024
Brown/Tan 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Bed 4 - Flooring
24-Mastic
331925621-0024A
Clear 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 4 - Flooring
25-Vinyl Floor Tile
331925621-0025
Brown/Tan 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Bed 4 - Flooring
25-Mastic
331925621-0025A
Clear 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 4 - Flooring
26 331925621-0026
Gray/Various/Black 6% Glass 94% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Shed roof - Roofing
Initial report from: 12/11/2019 12:20:18
ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/11/2019 9:20 AM Page 220 of 524 Page 3 of 4 LA Testing
5431 Industrial Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Tel/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944
http://www.LATesting.com / [email protected] LA Testing Order: 331925621
Customer ID: 32BACA26
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
27 331925621-0027
Gray/Various/Black 6% Glass 94% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected Fibrous
Homogeneous
Shed roof - Roofing
28 331925621-0028
Gray/Various/Black 5% Glass 95% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Shed roof - Roofing
Analyst(s)
David Garcia (41)
Tony Salgado (13)
Michael DeCavallas, Laboratory Manager
or Other Approved Signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.
Samples analyzed by LA Testing Huntington Beach, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from: 12/11/2019 12:20:18
ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/11/2019 9:20 AM Page 221 of 524 Page 4 of 4 OrderID: 331925621
OrderID: 331925621
OrderID: 331925621
1000 POINT
COUNT
ANALYSIS
LA Testing
5431 Industrial Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944
http://www.LATesting.com / [email protected] LA Testing Order: 331925621
Customer ID: 32BACA26
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Attention: Matt Crochet Phone: (310) 760-2112
Barr & Clark, Inc. Fax:
16531 Bolsa Chica Street Received: 12/06/2019 8:30 AM
Suite 205 Analysis Date: 12/10/2019
Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Collected:
Project: 3100457/Single Family Residence/18597 Altrudy Lane, Yorba Linda, CA 92780 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material via EPA 600/R-93/116. Quantitation using the 1,000 Point Count Procedure
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type Non-Asbestos Asbestos
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
1-Finish Coat Exterior walls - Stucco
331925621-0001
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
2-Finish Coat 2 Exterior walls - Stucco
331925621-0002A
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
3-Finish Coat Exterior walls - Stucco
331925621-0003
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
4-Finish Coat 2 Exterior walls - Stucco
331925621-0004A
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
5-Finish Coat 2 Exterior walls - Stucco
331925621-0005A
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
Analyst(s)
Tony Salgado (5) Michael DeCavallas, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
Some samples may contain asbestos fibers present in dimensions below PLM resolution limits.The limit of detection as stated in the method is 0.1%. EMSL Analytical Inc suggests that samples reported as <0.1% or none detected undergo additional analysis via TEM . The above test report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval EMSL Analytical Inc. This test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the United States Government . EMSL Analytical Inc. bears no responsibility for sample collection activities, analytical method limitations, or the accuracy of results when requested to separate layered samples. EMSL Analytical Inc liability is limited to the cost of sample analysis.The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.
Samples analyzed by LA Testing Huntington Beach, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from: 12/11/2019 09:20:15
ASB_PLMPC_0006_0003 Printed 12/11/2019 9:20:24AM Page 226 of 524 Page 1 of 1
APPENDIX
B
(INSPECTOR’S CERTIFICATES)
Asbestos Certifications
APPENDIX
C
(INSURANCE CERTIFICATE)
APPENDIX
D
(MAPS)
Living Room
Kitchen
Bedroom 4 Bath 2 Bedroom 3
Garage
Hall Bath 1
Bedroom 1 Bedroom 2
Enclosed Patio
AL
N
CS FX CS CS Bay
CS Bay
AL
A
B
C
D
Window Key: AL = Aluminum
CS = Casement FX = Fixed
Single Family Residence 18597 Altrudy Lane Yorba Linda, CA Project# 3100457
S
h
e
d
AL
AL
A
B
C
D
Window Key:
AL = Aluminum
Single Family Residence
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA
Project# 3100457 N
BARR & CLARK
Independent Environmental Testing
Asbestos • Lead • Mold • Phase I
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT
OF
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
18602 ALTRUDY LANE
YORBA LINDA, CA 92886
PROJECT NO. 3100458
DECEMBER 11, 2019
Prepared For:
C&C Development
14211 Yorba Street, Suite 200
Tustin, CA 92780
Inspected & Prepared By: Reviewed By:
Matthew Crochet Jeremy Nguyen
State of California State of California
Certified Asbestos Consultant Certified Asbestos Consultant
Asbestos Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18602 Altrudy Lane
Project No. 3100458 Page 2
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 3
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK......................................................................................................... 3
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 3
4.0 INSPECTOR’S QUALIFICATIONS............................................................................. 3
5.0 SAMPLING PROTOCOL / SAMPLE ANALYSIS ...................................................... 3
6.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS ........................................................................................... 4
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................ 5
8.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................... 5
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A LABORATORY RESULTS
APPENDIX B INSPECTOR’S CERTIFICATE(S)
APPENDIX C INSURANCE CERTIFICATE
APPENDIX D MAP(S)
Asbestos Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18602 Altrudy Lane
Project No. 3100458 Page 3
ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of Barr & Clark’s asbestos inspection of the Single Family Residence located at 18602 Altrudy Lane, Yorba Linda, California (Subject Property). This document is prepared for the sole use of C&C Development, the City of Yorba Linda and any regulatory agencies that are directly involved in this project. No other party should rely on the information contained herein without prior written consent of C&C Development. The scope of services, inspection methodology, and results are presented below.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The purpose of this inspection is to identify and assess certain accessible Asbestos Containing Construction Materials (ACCM) at the subject property.
On December 05, 2019, Barr & Clark performed an inspection for asbestos at the subject property in Yorba Linda, California. Physical bulk samples were collected of suspect materials from representative locations and submitted to an independent laboratory for analysis. If asbestos was detected at any concentration within a sample of a construction material, it was concluded that the material contains asbestos. Suspect materials were also visually inspected to assess their condition.
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The subject property is a single family residence that was built circa 1950. It is a one story building that is constructed over a slab foundation. The exterior walls are covered with stucco.
The home consists of three bedrooms, two bathrooms and an attached garage.
4.0 INSPECTOR’S QUALIFICATIONS
Matt Crochet of Barr & Clark performed the inspection at the site. Personnel certificate(s) have been provided in Appendix B.
5.0 SAMPLING PROTOCOL / SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sampling Protocol: Sampling was patterned after the Asbestos School Hazard Emergency Response Act (40 CFR 763 Subpart E) as mandated by Cal/OSHA (Title 8 Section 1529) and South Coast Air Quality Management District (Rule 1403).
Sample Analysis: Physical bulk samples were collected from this property and analyzed for asbestos content by an independent environmental laboratory which is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (Lab Code 200358-0). The method of analysis was 1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
Asbestos Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18602 Altrudy Lane
Project No. 3100458 Page 4
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
Polarized Light Microscopy (EPA 600/M4-82-020). Additional laboratory information can be found on the last page of the laboratory results (Appendix A).
6.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Asbestos Containing Construction Materials: Asbestos was detected in samples of several construction materials. The following summary identifies these materials, their location within the property, the condition in which they were observed at the time of inspection, approximate quantity of material and percentage of asbestos contained in the material as reported by laboratory analysis.
Material Sample # Location Condition Quantity* % Asbestos Roofing Mastic 4-6
Roof at Penetrations and
All Like Roofing Mastic
Throughout
Good 10 S.F. 5%
Exterior Stucco 7-11 Exterior Walls Throughout Good N/A <0.1%** See Note
Flooring 12-14
Kitchen, Laundry Room
and All Like Flooring
Throughout
Good 350 S.F. 3%-15%
Flooring Mastic 12-14
Kitchen, Laundry Room
and All Like Flooring
Mastic Throughout
Good 350 S.F. 2%
Joint Compound 20-22 Interior Walls and Ceilings
Throughout Good N/A <0.1%**See Note
Flooring 23-25
Living Room, Dining
Room, Hall, Bedrooms,
Den and All Like Flooring
Throughout
Good 950 S.F. 4%***
See Note
Flooring Mastic 23-25
Living Room, Dining
Room, Hall, Bedrooms,
Den and All Like Flooring
Mastic Throughout
Good 950 S.F. 3%***
See Note
Duct Insulation
Material
(Aircell)
Visual Heater Ducts and Registers
Throughout Good 500 S.F. Assumed
Asbestos Cement
Pipe(s) Visual Roof/Attic Good 20 S.F. Assumed
*NOTE: All quantification estimates are approximate and based on information and materials that were accessible at the time of inspection. The chosen contractor is solely responsible for verifying all final ACCM quantities for bidding, abatement, and disposal purposes.
Asbestos Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18602 Altrudy Lane
Project No. 3100458 Page 5
**NOTE: Stucco and joint compound sample results initially indicated an asbestos content of <1%. In an effort to verify asbestos content, these samples were re-analyzed utilizing a 1000- point point count method and found to have an asbestos content of less than or equal to 0.1%.
Because the results were less than or equal to 0.1% the material may be treated as non asbestos containing material as defined by AQMD and OSHA. ***NOTE: Flooring materials may be present under ceramic tiles in the bathrooms. Any suspect flooring materials found under the ceramic tile must be assumed positive.
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The analysis and recommendations submitted in this survey are based in part on the data obtained from specific and discrete sampling locations. However, the nature and extent of variations between the sampling locations may not become evident until renovation or demolition procedures commence. If potential variations (i.e. different building materials) are identified during renovation or demolition activities, it will be necessary to conduct additional bulk sampling.
ACCM in Damaged or Significantly Damaged Condition: These materials present the greatest risk for asbestos exposure. It is recommended that all damaged and/or significantly damaged asbestos containing construction materials be removed following SCAQMD Rule 1403 Procedure 5. An asbestos abatement contractor registered with the Division of Occupational Safety and Health must perform any work that disturbs these materials.
ACCM in Good Condition: No action is recommended for these materials. Asbestos containing materials that are maintained in good condition present minimal risk for asbestos exposure.
Note: If renovation or demolition activities are to affect these materials, an asbestos abatement contractor registered with the Division of Occupational Safety and Health should be contracted to perform all portions of the work affecting these materials.
8.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS
This inspection was planned, developed, and implemented based on Barr & Clark’s previous experience in performing asbestos inspections. Barr & Clark utilized state-of-the-art-practices and techniques in accordance with regulatory standards while performing this inspection. Barr & Clark’s evaluation of the relative risk of exposure to asbestos identified during this inspection is based on conditions observed at the time of the inspection. Barr & Clark cannot be responsible for changing conditions that may alter the relative exposure risk or for future changes in accepted methodology.
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
Asbestos Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18602 Altrudy Lane
Project No. 3100458 Page 6
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
This inspection did not evaluate hidden, buried or unseen building or other materials. When future renovation or demolition activities are undertaken, Barr & Clark should be contacted if such are encountered for further evaluation. Any materials that were not sampled during the inspection must be presumed to contain asbestos until proven otherwise. Access and inspection of attics or crawl spaces could be limited due to visibility, obstructions, health and safety hazards or structural issues. All undocumented materials should be presumed to contain asbestos until sampled and analyzed.
Enclosed are the actual test results and all relevant certifications and licenses.
APPENDIX
A
(LABORATORY RESULTS)
LA Testing
5431 Industrial Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Tel/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944
http://www.LATesting.com / [email protected] LA Testing Order: 331925624
Customer ID: 32BACA26
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Attention: Matt Crochet Phone: (310) 760-2112
Barr & Clark, Inc. Fax:
16531 Bolsa Chica Street Received Date: 12/06/2019 8:30 AM Suite 205 Analysis Date: 12/10/2019 - 12/11/2019
Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Collected Date:
Project: 3100458/Single Family Residence/18602 Altrudy Lane, Yorba Linda, CA 92886 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
1-Roofing 1
331925624-0001
Brown/Black 5% Glass 95% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Roof - Roofing
1-Roofing 2
331925624-0001A
Black 50% Cellulose 50% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected Fibrous
Homogeneous
Roof - Roofing
2-Roofing 1
331925624-0002
Brown/Black 5% Glass 95% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Roof - Roofing
2-Roofing 2
331925624-0002A
Black 50% Cellulose 50% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected Fibrous
Homogeneous
Roof - Roofing
3-Roofing 1
331925624-0003
Brown/Black 5% Glass 95% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Roof - Roofing
3-Roofing 2
331925624-0003A
Black 50% Cellulose 50% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected Fibrous
Homogeneous
Roof - Roofing
4 331925624-0004
Brown/Gray/Black 95% Non-fibrous (Other) 5% Chrysotile
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Roof @ penetrations -
Mastic
5 331925624-0005
Roof @ penetrations - Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
Mastic
6 331925624-0006
Roof @ penetrations - Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
Mastic
7-Finish Coat
331925624-0007
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
7-Stucco
331925624-0007A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
8-Finish Coat
331925624-0008
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
8-Stucco
331925624-0008A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
9-Finish Coat
331925624-0009
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
9-Stucco
331925624-0009A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
10-Finish Coat
331925624-0010
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
Initial report from: 12/11/2019 11:18:34
ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/11/2019 8:18 AM Page 243 of 524 Page 1 of 4 LA Testing
5431 Industrial Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Tel/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944
http://www.LATesting.com / [email protected] LA Testing Order: 331925624
Customer ID: 32BACA26
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
10-Stucco
331925624-0010A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
11-Finish Coat
331925624-0011
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
11-Stucco
331925624-0011A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior walls - Stucco
12-Flooring 1
331925624-0012
Gray/Tan 85% Non-fibrous (Other) 15% Chrysotile
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Kitchen - Flooring
12-Flooring 2
331925624-0012A
Brown 97% Non-fibrous (Other) 3% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Kitchen - Flooring
12-Mastic
331925624-0012B
Black 98% Non-fibrous (Other) 2% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Kitchen - Flooring
13-Flooring 1
331925624-0013
Kitchen - Flooring Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
13-Flooring 2
331925624-0013A
Kitchen - Flooring Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
13-Mastic
331925624-0013B
Kitchen - Flooring Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
14-Flooring 1
331925624-0014
Laundry - Flooring Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
14-Flooring 2
331925624-0014A
Laundry - Flooring Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
14-Mastic
331925624-0014B
Laundry - Flooring Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
15-Skim Coat
331925624-0015
Beige 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Living room - Plaster
15-Plaster
331925624-0015A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Living room - Plaster
16-Skim Coat
331925624-0016
Yellow 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Kitchen - Plaster
16-Plaster
331925624-0016A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Kitchen - Plaster
17-Skim Coat
331925624-0017
White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bath 2 - Plaster
17-Plaster
331925624-0017A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bath 2 - Plaster
18-Skim Coat
331925624-0018
Yellow 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 1 - Plaster
Initial report from: 12/11/2019 11:18:34
ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/11/2019 8:18 AM Page 244 of 524 Page 2 of 4 LA Testing
5431 Industrial Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Tel/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944
http://www.LATesting.com / [email protected] LA Testing Order: 331925624
Customer ID: 32BACA26
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
18-Plaster
331925624-0018A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 1 - Plaster
19-Skim Coat
331925624-0019
Green 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 3 - Plaster
19-Plaster
331925624-0019A
Gray 100% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Bed 3 - Plaster
20-Joint Compound
331925624-0020
White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Garage - DW & JC
20-Drywall
331925624-0020A
Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Glass
9%
3%
Brown/White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Garage - DW & JC
21-Joint Compound
331925624-0021
White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Garage - DW & JC
21-Drywall
331925624-0021A
Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Glass
9%
3%
Brown/White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Garage - DW & JC
22-Joint Compound
331925624-0022
White 100% Non-fibrous (Other) <1% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Garage - DW & JC
22-Drywall
331925624-0022A
Cellulose 88% Non-fibrous (Other) None Detected
Glass
9%
3%
Brown/White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Garage - DW & JC
23-Flooring
331925624-0023
Brown 96% Non-fibrous (Other) 4% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Living room -
Flooring(9"x9")
23-Mastic
331925624-0023A
Black 97% Non-fibrous (Other) 3% Chrysotile
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Living room -
Flooring(9"x9")
24-Flooring
331925624-0024
Bed 2 - Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
Flooring(9"x9")
24-Mastic
331925624-0024A
Bed 2 - Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
Flooring(9"x9")
25-Flooring
331925624-0025
Den - Flooring(9"x9") Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
25-Mastic
331925624-0025A
Den - Flooring(9"x9") Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)
Initial report from: 12/11/2019 11:18:34
ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/11/2019 8:18 AM Page 245 of 524 Page 3 of 4 LA Testing
5431 Industrial Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Tel/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944
http://www.LATesting.com / [email protected] LA Testing Order: 331925624
Customer ID: 32BACA26
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Analyst(s)
Alexis Rodriguez (8)
Monica Luna (30)
Michael DeCavallas, Laboratory Manager
or Other Approved Signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non-friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.
Samples analyzed by LA Testing Huntington Beach, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from: 12/11/2019 11:18:34
ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/11/2019 8:18 AM Page 246 of 524 Page 4 of 4 OrderID: 331925624
OrderID: 331925624
OrderID: 331925624
1000 POINT
COUNT
ANALYSIS
LA Testing
5431 Industrial Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Phone/Fax: (714) 828-4999 / (714) 828-4944
http://www.LATesting.com / [email protected] LA Testing Order: 331925624
Customer ID: 32BACA26
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Attention: Matt Crochet Phone: (310) 760-2112
Barr & Clark, Inc. Fax:
16531 Bolsa Chica Street Received: 12/06/2019 8:30 AM
Suite 205 Analysis Date: 12/10/2019 - 12/11/2019
Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Collected:
Project: 3100458/Single Family Residence/18602 Altrudy Lane, Yorba Linda, CA 92886 Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material via EPA 600/R-93/116. Quantitation using the 1,000 Point Count Procedure
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type Non-Asbestos Asbestos
Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
7-Finish Coat Exterior walls - Stucco
331925624-0007
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
8-Finish Coat Exterior walls - Stucco
331925624-0008
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
9-Finish Coat Exterior walls - Stucco
331925624-0009
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
10-Finish Coat Exterior walls - Stucco
331925624-0010
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
11-Finish Coat Exterior walls - Stucco
331925624-0011
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
20-Joint Compound Garage - DW & JC
331925624-0020
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
21-Joint Compound Garage - DW & JC
331925624-0021
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
22-Joint Compound Garage - DW & JC
331925624-0022
100.0% Non-fibrous (Other) <0.1%Chrysotile
Analyst(s)
Alexis Rodriguez (3)
Monica Luna (5)
Michael DeCavallas, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
Some samples may contain asbestos fibers present in dimensions below PLM resolution limits.The limit of detection as stated in the method is 0.1%. EMSL Analytical Inc suggests that samples reported as <0.1% or none detected undergo additional analysis via TEM . The above test report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval EMSL Analytical Inc. This test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the United States Government . EMSL Analytical Inc. bears no responsibility for sample collection activities, analytical method limitations, or the accuracy of results when requested to separate layered samples. EMSL Analytical Inc liability is limited to the cost of sample analysis.The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.
Samples analyzed by LA Testing Huntington Beach, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101384-0, CA ELAP 1406 Initial report from: 12/11/2019 08:18:33
ASB_PLMPC_0006_0003 Printed 12/11/2019 8:18:45AM Page 251 of 524 Page 1 of 1
APPENDIX
B
(INSPECTOR’S CERTIFICATES)
Asbestos Certifications
APPENDIX
C
(INSURANCE CERTIFICATE)
APPENDIX
D
(MAPS)
Living Room
Dining Room
Bedroom 3 Bedroom 2
Kitchen
Hall
Laundry Room
Bath 1 Bath 2 Bedroom 1
Den
Garage
N
CS FX CS CS FX CS CS FX CS CS FX CS
Bay
CS FX V V AL
A
C
B D
Window Key: AL = Aluminum
CS = Casement FX = Fixed V = Vinyl
Single Family Residence 18602 Altrudy Lane Yorba Linda, CA Project# 3100458
BARR & CLARK
Independent Environmental Testing
Asbestos • Lead • Mold • Phase I
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION REPORT
OF
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
18597 ALTRUDY LANE
YORBA LINDA, CA
PROJECT NO. 3100457
DECEMBER 11, 2019
Prepared For:
C&C Development
14211 Yorba Street, Suite 200
Tustin, CA 92780
Prepared By: Reviewed By:
Jeremy Nguyen Matt Crochet
State of California Certified State of California Certified Lead Inspector / Risk Assessor Lead Inspector / Risk Assessor
Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18597 Altrudy Lane
Project Number: 3100457 Page 2
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 3
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK......................................................................................................... 3
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 3
4.0 INSPECTOR’S QUALIFICATIONS............................................................................. 3
5.0 TESTING PROTOCOL.................................................................................................. 4
6.0 METHOD OF TESTING................................................................................................ 4
7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS ........................................................................................... 5
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................ 5
9.0 TITLE X REQUIREMENTS.......................................................................................... 6
10.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................... 6
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A SUMMARIES
LEAD CONTAINING COMPONENTS LIST
XRF FIELD DATA
APPENDIX B CDPH 8552
INSPECTOR’S CERTIFICATE(S)
INSURANCE CERTIFICATE
APPENDIX C MAP(S)
Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18597 Altrudy Lane
Project Number: 3100457 Page 3
LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of Barr & Clark Environmental’s lead-based paint (LBP) inspection of the Single Family Residence located at 18597 Altrudy Lane, Yorba Linda, California (Subject Property). This document is prepared for the sole use of the C&C Development, the City of Yorba Linda and any regulatory agencies that are directly involved in this project. No other party should rely on the information contained herein without prior written consent of the C&C Development. The scope of services, inspection methodology, and results are presented below.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The purpose of this inspection is to identify and assess the Lead-Based Paint (LBP) present on painted components at the subject property.
On December 05, 2019, Barr & Clark performed an inspection for lead-based paint at the subject property in Yorba Linda, California. To comply with EPA and HUD guidelines, painted and varnished surfaces in every accessible “room equivalent” were sampled for the presence of LBP. The intent was to ascertain the presence of lead-based paint above the federal action level. If LBP was found, the inspection would identify individual architectural components and their respective concentrations of lead in such a manner that this report would be used to characterize the presence of LBP at this property.
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The subject property is a single family residence that was built circa 1950. It is a one-story building that is constructed over a raised foundation. The exterior walls are covered with stucco/wood siding and the windows are a combination of casement, fixed and aluminum-framed types. The home consists of three bedrooms, two bathrooms, an attached garage, detached shed and a chicken coop. At the time of this inspection, most of the painted surfaces were in good to fair condition.
4.0 INSPECTOR’S QUALIFICATIONS
Matthew Crochet and Dana Williams of Barr & Clark performed the inspection at the site using an RMD LPA-1 XRF spectrum analyzer instrument. They have attended the radiation safety course for handling the instrument, and completed an EPA approved curriculum in Lead in Construction Inspector / Risk Assessor Training.
At the time of this report, the California Department of Health Services, Childhood Lead Poisoning Branch, has implemented a State Certification Model Accreditation Plan adopted from the EPA. Matthew Crochet and Dana Williams have received certification. Personnel certificate(s) have been provided in Appendix B.
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 wPage 262 of 524 w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18597 Altrudy Lane
Project Number: 3100457 Page 4
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
5.0 TESTING PROTOCOL
XRF Testing: Testing of the painted surfaces was patterned after the inspection protocol in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing1. In every “room equivalent” within the tested property, one representative surface of each “testing combination” was tested. Multiple readings were collected to resolve inconsistencies in the test results.
Regulatory Compliance: Several public (government) agencies have a published “regulatory action level” to classify LBP. To further complicate matters, some of the established “levels” are quantified in different units of measurement. Listed below are the current regulatory agencies that have defined LBP, along with the respective action level:
Agency Ordinance # Action level (mg / cm2) Action level (ppm2) HUD / EPA 24 CFR 35.86 & 40 CFR 745.103 1.0 mg / cm2 5,000 ppm OSHA / CAL OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 & Title 8, 1532.1 Not Specified 600 ppm3 HUD / EPA have recently issued the following guidance regarding units of measurement for paint samples:
“Report lead paint amounts in mg/cm² because this unit of measurement does not depend on the number of layers of non-leadbased paint and can usually be obtained without damaging the painted surface. All measurements of lead in paint should be in mg/cm², unless the surface area cannot be measured or if all paint cannot be removed from the measured surface area. In such cases, concentrations may be reported in weight percent (%) or parts per million by weight (ppm).”4 Furthermore, EPA has previously issued guidance on lead content classification as follows:
“… The rule, at 24 CFR 35.86 and 40 CFR 745.103 states that a lead-based paint free finding must demonstrate that the building is free of ‘paint or other surface coatings that contain lead in excess of 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (1.0 mg / cm2) or 0.5 percent by weight (5000 ppm).’ The State standards are not applicable, whether more or less stringent, since a State cannot amend Federal requirements.”5
In recognition of the various action levels the testing results are classified as follows for this report:
• Painted surfaces with readings at or above 1.0 mg / cm2are considered - Positive • Painted surfaces with readings at or below 0.9 mg / cm2are considered - Negative The individual readings have been provided on all field data sheets. Any future change in action levels by one of the regulating agencies may affect the classification of results.
6.0 METHOD OF TESTING
Paint Testing: The method employed was X-ray fluorescence (XRF) using a Radiation Monitoring Device Lead Paint Analyzer (RMD LPA-1). The instrument was operated in “Quick Mode,” where the duration for each test result is determined by a combination of:
• the actual reading relative to the designated action level; • the age of the radioactive source; and
• the substrate on which the test was taken.
1 2012 Revision
2 Parts per million
3 Applies to construction related activities
4 Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (2012 Revision). 5 Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, (August 20, 1996)
Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18597 Altrudy Lane
Project Number: 3100457 Page 5
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
The instrument’s calibration was verified according to the manufacturer's specifications in compliance with the Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) developed for this instrument.
The readings from this instrument produce a 95% confidence level that the “lead” reading accurately reflects the actual level of lead in the tested surfaces, relative to the federal action level.
7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Paint Sampling: Throughout the subject property, several of the painted components indicated the presence of lead-based paint (LBP) at or above the action level. The following summary lists the specific components that tested above the action level and their respective locations:
Interior of House
• Some of the tiled surfaces in bathroom 2 tested positive for lead. These surfaces were not painted and the lead is most likely in the glazing or the matrix of the tile itself.
Exterior of House
• Eaves, rafters and fascia
Sampling for this inspection was representative and any components that were not tested but similar to those components that tested positive for LBP should be considered and treated as lead laden.
The field data and results for paint sampling may be found in Appendix A.
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The greatest potential for lead exposure from lead painted architectural components occurs when:
• the paint has become defective; or
• when the paint is applied to a friction / impact component where the paint is continually disturbed; or
• when the paint is disturbed through routine maintenance or renovation activities.
With this in mind, the following are our recommendations for this property:
• The results from this inspection should be provided to any individuals that may disturb the painted surfaces. It is encouraged to utilize professionals that have experience working with LBP. • If renovation is scheduled in the near future (less than three months), all lead painted components that have been previously targeted for replacement should be replaced utilizing “lead safe” containment and work practices.
• ALL components that have been identified with defective lead paint should have the paint repaired as soon as possible. Any paint repair should be done utilizing “lead safe” containment, work practices, and clean-up techniques.
• All components with lead painted friction / impact surfaces should be treated to minimize the friction or impact as necessary.
Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18597 Altrudy Lane
Project Number: 3100457 Page 6
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
• Lead painted components that have not been targeted for replacement should either be considered for abatement (replacement, enclosure, encapsulation, etc.) or included in an Operations & Management (O & M) Plan that will help to minimize exposures to lead hazards. • All lead painted surfaces that are not expected to be impacted in the near future (less than three months) should also be included the O & M plan.
• In addition, the tenants or occupants of the dwelling should be notified of the test results and instructed in actions that they may perform to keep the living areas “lead safe.” • The tile surfaces are not a likely source of lead dust contamination as long as they remain intact. If future renovation or repair activities require that the tile be removed, or the surfaces disturbed, it should be done in a manner that does not break the tiles. If this is not feasible, this task should be assigned to a lead certified contractor.
9.0 TITLE X REQUIREMENTS
A copy (or summary) of this report must be provided to new lessees (tenants) and purchasers of this property under Federal law (24 CFR part 35 and 40 CFR part 745) before they become obligated under a lease or sales contract. The complete report must also be provided to new purchasers and it must be made available to new tenants. Landlords (lessors) and sellers are also required to distribute an educational pamphlet approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and include standard warning language in their leases or sales contracts to ensure that parents have the information they need to protect their children from lead-based paint hazards. This report should be maintained and updated as a permanent maintenance record for this property.
10.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS
This inspection was planned, developed, and implemented based on Barr & Clark’s previous experience in performing lead-based paint inspections. This inspection was patterned after Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (2012 Revision).
Barr & Clark utilized state-of-the-art-practices and techniques in accordance with regulatory standards while performing this inspection. Barr & Clark’s evaluation of the relative risk of exposure to lead identified during this inspection is based on conditions observed at the time of the inspection. Barr & Clark cannot be responsible for changing conditions that may alter the relative exposure risk or for future changes in accepted methodology. Enclosed are the diagram(s), actual test results, and all relevant certifications and licenses.
APPENDIX
A
XRF FIELD DATA
SUMMARY OF INTERIOR
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Component
Number
Tested
Number
Positive
Percent Positive Number
Negative
Percent Negative
Brick Fireplace 1 0 1 100.00%
Brick Hearth 1 0 1 100.00%
Metal Ceiling 1 0 1 100.00%
Metal Heater Vent 8 0 8 100.00%
Plaster Ceiling 9 0 9 100.00%
Plaster Heater Vent 1 0 1 100.00%
Plaster Wall 38 0 38 100.00%
Tile Floor 6 1 16.67% 5 83.33%
Tile Wall 6 3 50.00% 3 50.00%
Tile Backsplash 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Baseboard 9 0 9 100.00%
Wood Cabinet Door 5 0 5 100.00%
Wood Cabinet Frame 5 0 5 100.00%
Wood Cabinet Shelf 5 0 5 100.00%
Wood Ceiling 2 0 2 100.00%
Wood Closet Door 4 0 4 100.00%
Wood Closet Door Frame 4 0 4 100.00%
Wood Closet Shelf 4 0 4 100.00%
Wood Closet Shelf Support 4 0 4 100.00%
Wood Door 14 0 14 100.00%
Wood Door Frame 14 0 14 100.00%
Wood Mantle 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Wall 8 0 8 100.00%
Wood Window Frame 7 0 7 100.00%
Wood Window Sash 2 0 2 100.00%
Wood Window Sill 8 0 8 100.00%
Total 168 4 164
Testing done in compliance with current HUD guidelines for XRF.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM Page 267 of 524
SUMMARY OF EXTERIOR
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Component
Number
Tested
Number
Positive
Percent Positive Number
Negative
Percent Negative
Metal Beam 2 0 2 100.00%
Metal Ceiling 2 0 2 100.00%
Metal Column 2 0 2 100.00%
Metal Door Frame 1 0 1 100.00%
Metal Downspout 1 0 1 100.00%
Metal Electric Panel/Frame 2 0 2 100.00%
Metal Fascia 1 0 1 100.00%
Metal Fence 1 0 1 100.00%
Metal Gutter 1 0 1 100.00%
Metal Vent 1 0 1 100.00%
Stucco Wall 9 0 9 100.00%
Wood Beam 2 0 2 100.00%
Wood Cabinet Door 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Cabinet Frame 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Cabinet Shelf 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Ceiling 2 0 2 100.00%
Wood Column 2 0 2 100.00%
Wood Countertop 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Door 10 0 10 100.00%
Wood Door Frame 7 0 7 100.00%
Wood Eaves 5 4 80.00% 1 20.00%
Wood Fascia 7 4 57.14% 3 42.86%
Wood Garage Door 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Garage Door Frame 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Rafters 4 3 75.00% 1 25.00%
Wood Screen Door 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Soffit 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Threshold 2 0 2 100.00%
Wood Wall 15 0 15 100.00%
Wood Window Frame 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Window Well 1 0 1 100.00%
Total 89 11 78
Testing done in compliance with current HUD guidelines for XRF.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
SUMMARY OF CALIBRATION
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Component
Number
Tested
Number
Positive
Percent Positive Number
Negative
Percent Negative
Wood 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard 6 6 100.00% 0
Total 6 6 0
Testing done in compliance with current HUD guidelines for XRF.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
Interior Lead Containing Components List
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 154 B Tile Wall Interior Bathroom 2 18.0 POSITIVE Intact Shower 155 C Tile Wall Interior Bathroom 2 19.0 POSITIVE Intact Shower 156 D Tile Wall Interior Bathroom 2 17.0 POSITIVE Intact Shower 157 Tile Floor Interior Bathroom 2 17.0 POSITIVE Intact Shower The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 1 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
Exterior Lead Containing Components List
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 193 A Wood Eaves Exterior South Side 2.1 POSITIVE DETERIORATED 194 A Wood Rafters Exterior South Side 1.0 POSITIVE DETERIORATED 195 A Wood Fascia Exterior South Side 1.2 POSITIVE DETERIORATED 200 B Wood Eaves Exterior West Side 1.2 POSITIVE Intact 201 B Wood Rafters Exterior West Side 1.5 POSITIVE Intact 202 B Wood Fascia Exterior West Side 1.4 POSITIVE Intact 217 C Wood Eaves Exterior North Side 1.2 POSITIVE Intact 218 C Wood Fascia Exterior North Side 1.0 POSITIVE Intact 233 D Wood Eaves Exterior East Side 1.3 POSITIVE Intact 234 D Wood Rafters Exterior East Side 1.2 POSITIVE Intact 235 D Wood Fascia Exterior East Side 1.0 POSITIVE Intact The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 2 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
Calibration Lead Containing Components List
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 1 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Calibration Start of Job 1.0 POSITIVE Intact 2 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Calibration Start of Job 1.0 POSITIVE Intact 3 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Calibration Start of Job 1.1 POSITIVE Intact 261 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Calibration End of Job 1.0 POSITIVE Intact 262 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Calibration End of Job 1.0 POSITIVE Intact 263 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Calibration End of Job 1.0 POSITIVE Intact The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 3 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
FIELD DATA
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 1 Calibration Calibration Start of Job 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Intact 1.0 POSITIVE 2 Calibration Calibration Start of Job 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Intact 1.0 POSITIVE 3 Calibration Calibration Start of Job 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Intact 1.1 POSITIVE 4 Exterior Living Room A Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
5 Exterior Living Room A Door Frame Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 6 Exterior Living Room A Threshold Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 7 Exterior Living Room A Screen Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 8 Interior Living Room A Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
9 Interior Living Room A Door Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 10 Exterior Living Room B Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 11 Exterior Living Room B Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 12 Interior Living Room B Door Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 13 Interior Living Room B Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 14 Exterior Living Room C Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 15 Exterior Living Room C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 16 Interior Living Room C Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 17 Interior Living Room C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 18 Exterior Living Room C Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 19 Exterior Living Room C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 20 Exterior Living Room C Threshold Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 21 Interior Living Room C Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 22 Interior Living Room C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 23 Interior Living Room B Closet Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 24 Interior Living Room B Closet Door Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 25 Interior Living Room B Closet Shelf Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 26 Interior Living Room B Closet Shelf Support Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 27 Interior Living Room A Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 28 Interior Living Room B Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 29 Interior Living Room C Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 1 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 30 Interior Living Room D Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 31 Interior Living Room D Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 32 Interior Living Room Baseboard Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 33 Interior Living Room Floor Tile Intact 0.2 Negative
34 Interior Living Room Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 35 Interior Living Room B Mantle Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 36 Interior Living Room B Hearth Brick Intact 0.0 Negative 37 Interior Living Room B Fireplace Brick Intact 0.0 Negative 38 Interior Kitchen A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Bay Window 39 Interior Kitchen A Window Sash Wood Intact 0.1 Negative Bay Window 40 Interior Kitchen A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative Bay Window 41 Interior Kitchen A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Fixed 42 Interior Kitchen A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Fixed 43 Interior Kitchen A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 44 Interior Kitchen A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 45 Interior Kitchen A Cabinet Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 46 Interior Kitchen A Cabinet Door Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 47 Interior Kitchen A Cabinet Shelf Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 48 Interior Kitchen A Backsplash Tile Intact 0.2 Negative 49 Interior Kitchen A Wall Plaster Intact 0.5 Negative
50 Interior Kitchen B Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative
51 Interior Kitchen C Wall Plaster Intact 0.5 Negative
52 Interior Kitchen D Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
53 Interior Kitchen Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative 54 Interior Kitchen Baseboard Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
55 Interior Kitchen Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 56 Interior Kitchen Floor Tile Intact 0.2 Negative
57 Exterior Garage C Door Wood DETERIORATED 0.3 Negative 58 Exterior Garage C Door Frame Wood DETERIORATED 0.2 Negative The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 2 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 59 Interior Garage C Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
60 Interior Garage C Door Frame Wood DETERIORATED 0.3 Negative 61 Interior Garage D Cabinet Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 62 Interior Garage D Cabinet Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 63 Interior Garage D Cabinet Shelf Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 64 Interior Garage A Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative
65 Interior Garage C Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
66 Interior Garage D Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative
67 Interior Hall A Cabinet Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 68 Interior Hall A Cabinet Door Wood Intact 0.4 Negative 69 Interior Hall A Cabinet Shelf Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 70 Interior Hall A Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
71 Interior Hall C Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative
72 Interior Hall D Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
73 Interior Hall Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
74 Interior Hall Baseboard Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
75 Interior Hall Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.3 Negative
76 Interior Hall Floor Tile Intact 0.2 Negative
77 Interior Bedroom 1 A Door Wood Intact 0.1 Negative
78 Interior Bedroom 1 A Door Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 79 Interior Bedroom 1 C Window Sill Wood Intact 0.1 Negative Aluminum 80 Interior Bedroom 1 D Closet Door Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 81 Interior Bedroom 1 D Closet Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 82 Interior Bedroom 1 D Closet Shelf Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 83 Interior Bedroom 1 D Closet Shelf Support Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 84 Interior Bedroom 1 A Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 85 Interior Bedroom 1 B Wall Plaster Intact 0.5 Negative 86 Interior Bedroom 1 C Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative 87 Interior Bedroom 1 D Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 3 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 88 Interior Bedroom 1 Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 89 Interior Bedroom 1 Baseboard Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 90 Interior Bedroom 1 Heater Vent Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 91 Interior Bedroom 2 A Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
92 Interior Bedroom 2 A Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 93 Interior Bedroom 2 B Closet Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 94 Interior Bedroom 2 B Closet Door Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 95 Interior Bedroom 2 B Closet Shelf Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 96 Interior Bedroom 2 B Closet Shelf Support Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 97 Interior Bedroom 2 A Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 98 Interior Bedroom 2 B Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 99 Interior Bedroom 2 C Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 100 Interior Bedroom 2 D Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 101 Interior Bedroom 2 Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 102 Interior Bedroom 2 Baseboard Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 103 Interior Bedroom 2 A Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.1 Negative 104 Exterior Bathroom 1 D Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 105 Exterior Bathroom 1 D Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 106 Interior Bathroom 1 D Door Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 107 Interior Bathroom 1 D Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 108 Interior Bathroom 1 B Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 109 Interior Bathroom 1 B Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 110 Interior Bathroom 1 A Cabinet Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 111 Interior Bathroom 1 A Cabinet Door Wood Intact 0.4 Negative 112 Interior Bathroom 1 A Cabinet Shelf Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 113 Interior Bathroom 1 A Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 114 Interior Bathroom 1 B Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative 115 Interior Bathroom 1 C Wall Plaster Intact 0.5 Negative 116 Interior Bathroom 1 D Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 4 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 117 Interior Bathroom 1 Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 118 Interior Bathroom 1 Baseboard Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 119 Interior Bathroom 1 Floor Tile Intact 0.3 Negative
120 Interior Bathroom 1 B Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 121 Interior Bathroom 1 B Wall Tile Intact 0.2 Negative Shower 122 Interior Bathroom 1 C Wall Tile Intact 0.2 Negative Shower 123 Interior Bathroom 1 D Wall Tile Intact 0.2 Negative Shower 124 Interior Bathroom 1 D Floor Tile Intact 0.1 Negative Shower 125 Interior Bedroom 3 C Door Wood Intact 0.1 Negative
126 Interior Bedroom 3 C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 127 Interior Bedroom 3 A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Bay Window 128 Interior Bedroom 3 A Window Sash Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Bay Window 129 Interior Bedroom 3 A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Bay Window 130 Interior Bedroom 3 B Closet Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 131 Interior Bedroom 3 B Closet Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 132 Interior Bedroom 3 B Closet Shelf Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 133 Interior Bedroom 3 B Closet Shelf Support Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 134 Interior Bedroom 3 A Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 135 Interior Bedroom 3 B Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative 136 Interior Bedroom 3 C Wall Plaster Intact 0.5 Negative 137 Interior Bedroom 3 D Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative 138 Interior Bedroom 3 Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 139 Interior Bedroom 3 Baseboard Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 140 Interior Bedroom 3 C Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 141 Interior Bathroom 2 D Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 142 Interior Bathroom 2 D Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 143 Interior Bathroom 2 B Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 144 Interior Bathroom 2 B Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 145 Interior Bathroom 2 A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 5 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 146 Interior Bathroom 2 A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 147 Interior Bathroom 2 A Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative 148 Interior Bathroom 2 B Wall Plaster Intact 0.5 Negative 149 Interior Bathroom 2 C Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative 150 Interior Bathroom 2 D Wall Plaster Intact 0.5 Negative 151 Interior Bathroom 2 Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.5 Negative 152 Interior Bathroom 2 Baseboard Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 153 Interior Bathroom 2 Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 154 Interior Bathroom 2 B Wall Tile Intact 18.0 POSITIVE Shower 155 Interior Bathroom 2 C Wall Tile Intact 19.0 POSITIVE Shower 156 Interior Bathroom 2 D Wall Tile Intact 17.0 POSITIVE Shower 157 Interior Bathroom 2 Floor Tile Intact 17.0 POSITIVE Shower 158 Interior Bedroom 4 C Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
159 Interior Bedroom 4 C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 160 Interior Bedroom 4 A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Casement 161 Interior Bedroom 4 A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Casement 162 Interior Bedroom 4 A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Fixed 163 Interior Bedroom 4 A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Fixed 164 Interior Bedroom 4 B Cabinet Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 165 Interior Bedroom 4 B Cabinet Door Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 166 Interior Bedroom 4 B Cabinet Shelf Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 167 Interior Bedroom 4 A Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative 168 Interior Bedroom 4 B Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 169 Interior Bedroom 4 C Wall Plaster Intact 0.7 Negative 170 Interior Bedroom 4 D Wall Plaster Intact 0.5 Negative 171 Interior Bedroom 4 Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative 172 Interior Bedroom 4 Baseboard Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 173 Interior Bedroom 4 C Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 174 Interior Enclosed Patio A Wall Wood Intact 0.1 Negative The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 6 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 175 Interior Enclosed Patio B Wall Wood Intact 0.0 Negative 176 Interior Enclosed Patio C Wall Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 177 Interior Enclosed Patio D Wall Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 178 Interior Enclosed Patio Ceiling Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 179 Interior Enclosed Patio Ceiling Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 180 Exterior Shed D Door Wood Intact 0.1 Negative
181 Exterior Shed D Door Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 182 Interior Shed D Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
183 Interior Shed D Door Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 184 Interior Shed A Wall Wood Intact 0.0 Negative
185 Interior Shed B Wall Wood Intact 0.0 Negative
186 Interior Shed C Wall Wood Intact 0.0 Negative
187 Interior Shed D Wall Wood Intact 0.0 Negative
188 Interior Shed Ceiling Wood Intact 0.0 Negative
189 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Wall Stucco DETERIORATED 0.3 Negative 190 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Wall Stucco DETERIORATED 0.2 Negative 191 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Wall Wood DETERIORATED 0.2 Negative 192 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Wall Wood DETERIORATED 0.3 Negative 193 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Eaves Wood DETERIORATED 2.1 POSITIVE 194 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Rafters Wood DETERIORATED 1.0 POSITIVE 195 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Fascia Wood DETERIORATED 1.2 POSITIVE 196 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Garage Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 197 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Garage Door Frame Wood DETERIORATED 0.3 Negative 198 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Wall Stucco DETERIORATED 0.2 Negative 199 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Wall Stucco DETERIORATED 0.3 Negative 200 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Eaves Wood Intact 1.2 POSITIVE 201 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Rafters Wood Intact 1.5 POSITIVE 202 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Fascia Wood Intact 1.4 POSITIVE 203 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Electric Panel/Frame Metal DETERIORATED 0.3 Negative The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 7 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 204 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Column Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 205 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Beam Metal Intact 0.3 Negative 206 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Ceiling Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 207 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Cabinet Frame Wood DETERIORATED 0.1 Negative 208 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Cabinet Door Wood DETERIORATED 0.1 Negative 209 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Cabinet Shelf Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 210 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Countertop Wood DETERIORATED 0.2 Negative 211 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Water Heater Closet 212 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Water Heater Closet 213 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Wall Stucco Intact 0.3 Negative 214 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Wall Stucco Intact 0.2 Negative 215 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Wall Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 216 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Wall Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 217 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Eaves Wood Intact 1.2 POSITIVE 218 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Fascia Wood Intact 1.0 POSITIVE 219 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Soffit Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 220 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Column Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 221 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Beam Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 222 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Ceiling Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 223 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Column Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 224 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Beam Metal Intact 0.1 Negative 225 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Ceiling Metal Intact 0.5 Negative 226 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Wall Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Enclosed Porch 227 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Wall Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Enclosed Porch 228 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Fascia Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 229 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Wall Stucco Intact 0.2 Negative 230 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Wall Stucco Intact 0.2 Negative 231 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Wall Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 232 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Wall Stucco Intact 0.2 Negative The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 8 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 233 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Eaves Wood Intact 1.3 POSITIVE 234 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Rafters Wood Intact 1.2 POSITIVE 235 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Fascia Wood Intact 1.0 POSITIVE 236 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Electric Panel/Frame Metal Intact 0.7 Negative 237 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Vent Metal DETERIORATED 0.6 Negative 238 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Fence Metal Intact 0.4 Negative 239 Exterior Shed B Door Wood DETERIORATED 0.1 Negative 240 Exterior Shed A Wall Wood Intact 0.1 Negative
241 Exterior Shed B Wall Wood Intact 0.1 Negative
242 Exterior Shed C Wall Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
243 Exterior Shed D Wall Wood Intact 0.1 Negative
244 Exterior Shed D Window Well Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Aluminum 245 Exterior Shed D Window Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative Aluminum 246 Exterior Shed B Eaves Wood Intact 0.1 Negative
247 Exterior Shed B Rafters Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
248 Exterior Shed B Fascia Wood Intact 0.1 Negative
249 Exterior Shed D Fascia Wood Intact 0.1 Negative
250 Exterior Shed D Gutter Metal Intact 0.1 Negative
251 Exterior Shed D Downspout Metal Intact 0.1 Negative 252 Chicken Coop Exterior Door Wood DETERIORATED 0.2 Negative 253 Chicken Coop Exterior Wall Wood DETERIORATED 0.0 Negative 254 Chicken Coop Exterior Wall Wood DETERIORATED 0.1 Negative 255 Chicken Coop Exterior Wall Wood DETERIORATED 0.0 Negative 256 Chicken Coop Exterior Wall Wood DETERIORATED 0.1 Negative 257 Chicken Coop Exterior Fascia Wood DETERIORATED 0.1 Negative 258 Chicken Coop Exterior Column Wood DETERIORATED 0.1 Negative 259 Chicken Coop Exterior Beam Wood DETERIORATED 0.2 Negative 260 Chicken Coop Exterior Ceiling Wood DETERIORATED 0.2 Negative 261 Calibration Calibration End of Job 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Intact 1.0 POSITIVE The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 9 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100457
Address:
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92780
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 262 Calibration Calibration End of Job 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Intact 1.0 POSITIVE 263 Calibration Calibration End of Job 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Intact 1.0 POSITIVE The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 10 12/6/2019 07:43:44 AM
APPENDIX
B
CDPH 8552
INSPECTOR’S CERTIFICATES
INSURANCE CERTIFICATE
State of California-Health and Human Services Agency
California Department of Public Health
LEAD HAZARD EVALUATION REPORT
Section 1-Date of Lead Hazard Evaluation 12/5/2019
Section 2-Type of Lead Hazard Evaluation (Check one box only) Lead inspection Risk assessment Clearance inspection Other (specify) Section 3-Structure Where Lead Hazard Evaluation Was Conducted Address (number, street, apartment (if applicable)
18597 Altrudy Lane
City
Yorba Linda
County
Orange
ZIP code
92780
Construction date (year) of
structure
1950
Type of structure (check one box only) Children Living in Structure? Multi-unit building School or Daycare Yes No
Single Family Dwelling Other (specify) Don’t Know Section 4-Owner of Structure (If business/agency, list contact person) Name
Kara Cawood
Telephone number
(714) 714-0638
Address [number, street, apartment (if applicable)]
18597 Altrudy Lane
City
Yorba Linda
State
CA
ZIP code
92780
Section 5-Results of Lead Hazard Evaluation (Check all that apply) No lead-based paint detected Intact Lead-based paint detected Deteriorated Lead-based paint detected
No lead hazards detected Lead Contaminated Dust Found Lead Contaminated Soil Found Other (specify)
Section 6-Individual Conducting Lead Hazard Evaluation
Name
Matthew Crochet
Telephone number
714-894-5700
Address (number, street, apartment (if applicable)
16531 Bolsa Chica, Suite 205
City
Huntington Beach
State
CA
ZIP code
92649
CDPH certification number
12 Signature
➢
Date
12/11/2019
Name and CDPH certification number of any other individuals conducting sampling or testing (if applicable) Dana Williams 25385
Section 7-Attachments
A. A foundation diagram or sketch of the structure indicating the specific locations of each lead hazard or presence of lead-based paint;
B. Each testing method, device, and sampling procedure used; C. All data collected, including quality control data, laboratory results, including laboratory name, address, and phone number.
First copy and attachments retained by inspector
Second copy and attachments retained by owner Third copy only (no attachments) mailed to:
California Department of Public Health
Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch Reports
850 Maria Bay Parkway, Building P, Third Floor
Richmond, CA 94804-6403 Fax (510) 620-5656
CDPH 8552 (6/07)
APPENDIX
C
MAP(S)
Living Room
Kitchen
Bedroom 4 Bath 2 Bedroom 3
Garage
Hall Bath 1
Bedroom 1 Bedroom 2
Enclosed Patio
AL
N
CS FX CS CS Bay
CS Bay
AL
A
B
C
D
Window Key: AL = Aluminum
CS = Casement FX = Fixed
Single Family Residence 18597 Altrudy Lane Yorba Linda, CA Project# 3100457
S
h
e
d
AL
AL
A
B
C
D
Window Key:
AL = Aluminum
Single Family Residence
18597 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA
Project# 3100457 N
BARR & CLARK
Independent Environmental Testing
Asbestos • Lead • Mold • Phase I
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION REPORT
OF
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
18602 ALTRUDY LANE
YORBA LINDA, CA
PROJECT NO. 3100458
DECEMBER 11, 2019
Prepared For:
C&C Development
14211 Yorba Street, Suite 200
Tustin, CA 92780
Prepared By: Reviewed By:
Jeremy Nguyen Matt Crochet
State of California Certified State of California Certified Lead Inspector / Risk Assessor Lead Inspector / Risk Assessor
Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18602 Altrudy Lane
Project Number: 3100458 Page 2
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 3
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK......................................................................................................... 3
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 3
4.0 INSPECTOR’S QUALIFICATIONS............................................................................. 3
5.0 TESTING PROTOCOL.................................................................................................. 4
6.0 METHOD OF TESTING................................................................................................ 4
7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS ........................................................................................... 5
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................ 5
9.0 TITLE X REQUIREMENTS.......................................................................................... 6
10.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................... 6
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A SUMMARIES
LEAD CONTAINING COMPONENTS LIST
XRF FIELD DATA
APPENDIX B CDPH 8552
INSPECTOR’S CERTIFICATE(S)
INSURANCE CERTIFICATE
APPENDIX C MAP(S)
Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18602 Altrudy Lane
Project Number: 3100458 Page 3
LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of Barr & Clark Environmental’s lead-based paint (LBP) inspection of the Single Family Residence located at 18602 Altrudy Lane, Yorba Linda, California (Subject Property). This document is prepared for the sole use of the C&C Development, the City of Yorba Linda and any regulatory agencies that are directly involved in this project. No other party should rely on the information contained herein without prior written consent of the C&C Development. The scope of services, inspection methodology, and results are presented below.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The purpose of this inspection is to identify and assess the Lead-Based Paint (LBP) present on painted components at the subject property.
On December 05, 2019, Barr & Clark performed an inspection for lead-based paint at the subject property in Yorba Linda, California. To comply with EPA and HUD guidelines, painted and varnished surfaces in every accessible “room equivalent” were sampled for the presence of LBP. The intent was to ascertain the presence of lead-based paint above the federal action level. If LBP was found, the inspection would identify individual architectural components and their respective concentrations of lead in such a manner that this report would be used to characterize the presence of LBP at this property.
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The subject property is a single family residence that was built circa 1950. It is a one-story building that is constructed over a slab foundation. The exterior walls are covered with stucco and the windows are a combination of vinyl, casement, fixed and aluminum-framed types. The home consists of three bedrooms, two bathrooms and an attached garage. At the time of this inspection, most of the painted surfaces were in good condition.
4.0 INSPECTOR’S QUALIFICATIONS
Matthew Crochet and Dana Williams of Barr & Clark performed the inspection at the site using an RMD LPA-1 XRF spectrum analyzer instrument. They have attended the radiation safety course for handling the instrument, and completed an EPA approved curriculum in Lead in Construction Inspector / Risk Assessor Training.
At the time of this report, the California Department of Health Services, Childhood Lead Poisoning Branch, has implemented a State Certification Model Accreditation Plan adopted from the EPA. Matthew Crochet and Dana Williams have received certification. Personnel certificate(s) have been provided in Appendix B.
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 wPage 295 of 524 w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18602 Altrudy Lane
Project Number: 3100458 Page 4
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
5.0 TESTING PROTOCOL
XRF Testing: Testing of the painted surfaces was patterned after the inspection protocol in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing1. In every “room equivalent” within the tested property, one representative surface of each “testing combination” was tested. Multiple readings were collected to resolve inconsistencies in the test results.
Regulatory Compliance: Several public (government) agencies have a published “regulatory action level” to classify LBP. To further complicate matters, some of the established “levels” are quantified in different units of measurement. Listed below are the current regulatory agencies that have defined LBP, along with the respective action level:
Agency Ordinance # Action level (mg / cm2) Action level (ppm2) HUD / EPA 24 CFR 35.86 & 40 CFR 745.103 1.0 mg / cm2 5,000 ppm OSHA / CAL OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 & Title 8, 1532.1 Not Specified 600 ppm3 HUD / EPA have recently issued the following guidance regarding units of measurement for paint samples:
“Report lead paint amounts in mg/cm² because this unit of measurement does not depend on the number of layers of non-leadbased paint and can usually be obtained without damaging the painted surface. All measurements of lead in paint should be in mg/cm², unless the surface area cannot be measured or if all paint cannot be removed from the measured surface area. In such cases, concentrations may be reported in weight percent (%) or parts per million by weight (ppm).”4 Furthermore, EPA has previously issued guidance on lead content classification as follows:
“… The rule, at 24 CFR 35.86 and 40 CFR 745.103 states that a lead-based paint free finding must demonstrate that the building is free of ‘paint or other surface coatings that contain lead in excess of 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (1.0 mg / cm2) or 0.5 percent by weight (5000 ppm).’ The State standards are not applicable, whether more or less stringent, since a State cannot amend Federal requirements.”5
In recognition of the various action levels the testing results are classified as follows for this report:
• Painted surfaces with readings at or above 1.0 mg / cm2are considered - Positive • Painted surfaces with readings at or below 0.9 mg / cm2are considered - Negative The individual readings have been provided on all field data sheets. Any future change in action levels by one of the regulating agencies may affect the classification of results.
6.0 METHOD OF TESTING
Paint Testing: The method employed was X-ray fluorescence (XRF) using a Radiation Monitoring Device Lead Paint Analyzer (RMD LPA-1). The instrument was operated in “Quick Mode,” where the duration for each test result is determined by a combination of:
• the actual reading relative to the designated action level; • the age of the radioactive source; and
• the substrate on which the test was taken.
1 2012 Revision
2 Parts per million
3 Applies to construction related activities
4 Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (2012 Revision). 5 Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, (August 20, 1996)
Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18602 Altrudy Lane
Project Number: 3100458 Page 5
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
The instrument’s calibration was verified according to the manufacturer's specifications in compliance with the Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) developed for this instrument.
The readings from this instrument produce a 95% confidence level that the “lead” reading accurately reflects the actual level of lead in the tested surfaces, relative to the federal action level.
7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Paint Sampling: Throughout the subject property, several of the painted components indicated the presence of lead-based paint (LBP) at or above the action level. The following summary lists the specific components that tested above the action level and their respective locations:
Interior
• Garage - door (smaller passageway)
• Some of the tiled surfaces in the living room and kitchen also tested positive for lead. These surfaces were not painted and the lead is most likely in the glazing or the matrix of the tile itself.
Exterior
• Door (smaller passageway) at garage
Sampling for this inspection was representative and any components that were not tested but similar to those components that tested positive for LBP should be considered and treated as lead laden.
The field data and results for paint sampling may be found in Appendix A.
8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The greatest potential for lead exposure from lead painted architectural components occurs when:
• the paint has become defective; or
• when the paint is applied to a friction / impact component where the paint is continually disturbed; or
• when the paint is disturbed through routine maintenance or renovation activities.
With this in mind, the following are our recommendations for this property:
• The results from this inspection should be provided to any individuals that may disturb the painted surfaces. It is encouraged to utilize professionals that have experience working with LBP. • If renovation is scheduled in the near future (less than three months), all lead painted components that have been previously targeted for replacement should be replaced utilizing “lead safe” containment and work practices.
• ALL components that have been identified with defective lead paint should have the paint repaired as soon as possible. Any paint repair should be done utilizing “lead safe” containment, work practices, and clean-up techniques.
Lead-Based Paint Inspection Report
Single Family Residence
18602 Altrudy Lane
Project Number: 3100458 Page 6
1 6 5 3 1 B o l s a C h i c a , S u i t e 2 0 5 • H u n t i n g t o n B e a c h , C A 9 2 6 4 9 • 7 1 4 . 8 9 4 . 5 7 0 0 w w w . b a r r a n d c l a r k . c o m
• All components with lead painted friction / impact surfaces should be treated to minimize the friction or impact as necessary.
• Lead painted components that have not been targeted for replacement should either be considered for abatement (replacement, enclosure, encapsulation, etc.) or included in an Operations & Management (O & M) Plan that will help to minimize exposures to lead hazards. • All lead painted surfaces that are not expected to be impacted in the near future (less than three months) should also be included the O & M plan.
• In addition, the tenants or occupants of the dwelling should be notified of the test results and instructed in actions that they may perform to keep the living areas “lead safe.” • The tile surfaces are not a likely source of lead dust contamination as long as they remain intact. If future renovation or repair activities require that the tile be removed, or the surfaces disturbed, it should be done in a manner that does not break the tiles. If this is not feasible, this task should be assigned to a lead certified contractor.
9.0 TITLE X REQUIREMENTS
A copy (or summary) of this report must be provided to new lessees (tenants) and purchasers of this property under Federal law (24 CFR part 35 and 40 CFR part 745) before they become obligated under a lease or sales contract. The complete report must also be provided to new purchasers and it must be made available to new tenants. Landlords (lessors) and sellers are also required to distribute an educational pamphlet approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and include standard warning language in their leases or sales contracts to ensure that parents have the information they need to protect their children from lead-based paint hazards. This report should be maintained and updated as a permanent maintenance record for this property.
10.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS
This inspection was planned, developed, and implemented based on Barr & Clark’s previous experience in performing lead-based paint inspections. This inspection was patterned after Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (2012 Revision).
Barr & Clark utilized state-of-the-art-practices and techniques in accordance with regulatory standards while performing this inspection. Barr & Clark’s evaluation of the relative risk of exposure to lead identified during this inspection is based on conditions observed at the time of the inspection. Barr & Clark cannot be responsible for changing conditions that may alter the relative exposure risk or for future changes in accepted methodology. Enclosed are the diagram(s), actual test results, and all relevant certifications and licenses.
APPENDIX
A
XRF FIELD DATA
SUMMARY OF INTERIOR
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Component
Number
Tested
Number
Positive
Percent Positive Number
Negative
Percent Negative
Brick Fireplace 1 0 1 100.00%
Brick Hearth 1 0 1 100.00%
Brick Mantle 1 0 1 100.00%
Gypsum Wall 4 0 4 100.00%
Metal Heater Vent 9 0 9 100.00%
Plaster Ceiling 10 0 10 100.00%
Plaster Wall 44 0 44 100.00%
Plaster Window Sill 1 0 1 100.00%
Tile Floor 4 1 25.00% 3 75.00%
Tile Wall 6 0 6 100.00%
Tile Backsplash 2 2 100.00% 0
Tile Countertop 2 2 100.00% 0
Tile Window Sill 2 0 2 100.00%
Wood Attic Access/Frame 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Baseboard 9 0 9 100.00%
Wood Cabinet Door 5 0 5 100.00%
Wood Cabinet Frame 7 0 7 100.00%
Wood Cabinet Shelf 5 0 5 100.00%
Wood Chair Rail 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Closet Door 5 0 5 100.00%
Wood Closet Door Frame 5 0 5 100.00%
Wood Closet Shelf 4 0 4 100.00%
Wood Closet Shelf Support 4 0 4 100.00%
Wood Door 14 1 7.14% 13 92.86%
Wood Door Frame 15 0 15 100.00%
Wood Threshold 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Window Frame 12 0 12 100.00%
Wood Window Sill 12 0 12 100.00%
Wood Work Bench 1 0 1 100.00%
Total 188 6 182
Testing done in compliance with current HUD guidelines for XRF.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM Page 300 of 524
SUMMARY OF EXTERIOR
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Component
Number
Tested
Number
Positive
Percent Positive Number
Negative
Percent Negative
Metal Ceiling 1 0 1 100.00%
Metal Column 1 0 1 100.00%
Metal Electric Panel/Frame 1 0 1 100.00%
Metal Railing 1 0 1 100.00%
Metal Window Frame 3 0 3 100.00%
Metal Window Sash 8 0 8 100.00%
Metal Window Well 2 0 2 100.00%
Stucco Wall 8 0 8 100.00%
Wood Beam 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Ceiling 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Column 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Door 5 1 20.00% 4 80.00%
Wood Door Frame 5 0 5 100.00%
Wood Eaves 4 0 4 100.00%
Wood Fascia 4 0 4 100.00%
Wood Garage Door 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Garage Door Frame 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Rafters 4 0 4 100.00%
Wood Threshold 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Window Frame 6 0 6 100.00%
Wood Window Sash 1 0 1 100.00%
Wood Window Well 7 0 7 100.00%
Total 67 1 66
Testing done in compliance with current HUD guidelines for XRF.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 Page 301 of 524 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
SUMMARY OF CALIBRATION
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Component
Number
Tested
Number
Positive
Percent Positive Number
Negative
Percent Negative
Wood 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard 6 6 100.00% 0
Total 6 6 0
Testing done in compliance with current HUD guidelines for XRF.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
Interior Lead Containing Components List
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Protocol:HUD
Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 21 Tile Floor Interior Living Room 43.0 POSITIVE Intact 36 A Tile Countertop Interior Kitchen 7.0 POSITIVE Intact 37 A Tile Backsplash Interior Kitchen 10.0 POSITIVE Intact 41 C Tile Countertop Interior Kitchen 8.1 POSITIVE Intact 42 C Tile Backsplash Interior Kitchen 7.6 POSITIVE Intact 164 B Wood Door Interior Garage 2.5 POSITIVE DETERIORATED The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 1 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
Exterior Lead Containing Components List
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Protocol:HUD
Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 173 B Wood Door Exterior Garage 9.0 POSITIVE Intact
The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 2 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
Calibration Lead Containing Components List
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Protocol:HUD
Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 1 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Calibration Start of Job 1.0 POSITIVE Intact 2 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Calibration Start of Job 1.0 POSITIVE Intact 3 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Calibration Start of Job 1.0 POSITIVE Intact 259 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Calibration End of Job 1.0 POSITIVE Intact 260 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Calibration End of Job 1.1 POSITIVE Intact 261 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Calibration End of Job 1.1 POSITIVE Intact The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 3 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
FIELD DATA
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 1 Calibration Calibration Start of Job 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Intact 1.0 POSITIVE 2 Calibration Calibration Start of Job 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Intact 1.0 POSITIVE 3 Calibration Calibration Start of Job 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Intact 1.0 POSITIVE 4 Exterior Living Room A Door Wood Intact 0.3 Negative
5 Exterior Living Room A Door Frame Wood DETERIORATED 0.2 Negative 6 Interior Living Room A Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
7 Interior Living Room A Door Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 8 Interior Living Room A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.1 Negative Casement 9 Interior Living Room A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative Casement 10 Interior Living Room A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Fixed 11 Interior Living Room A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Fixed 12 Interior Living Room A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 13 Interior Living Room A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 14 Interior Living Room A Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 15 Interior Living Room B Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 16 Interior Living Room C Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 17 Interior Living Room D Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 18 Interior Living Room Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 19 Interior Living Room Baseboard Wood Intact 0.5 Negative 20 Interior Living Room Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 21 Interior Living Room Floor Tile Intact 43.0 POSITIVE 22 Interior Living Room B Mantle Brick Intact 0.2 Negative 23 Interior Living Room B Hearth Brick Intact 0.3 Negative 24 Interior Living Room B Fireplace Brick Intact 0.2 Negative 25 Interior Kitchen A Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 26 Interior Kitchen B Window Sill Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Bay Window 27 Interior Kitchen B Window Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Bay Window 28 Interior Kitchen C Window Sill Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Fixed 29 Interior Kitchen C Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Fixed The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 1 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 30 Interior Kitchen C Window Sill Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Casement 31 Interior Kitchen C Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Casement 32 Interior Kitchen C Window Sill Plaster Intact 0.1 Negative Vinyl 33 Interior Kitchen A Cabinet Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 34 Interior Kitchen A Cabinet Door Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 35 Interior Kitchen A Cabinet Shelf Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 36 Interior Kitchen A Countertop Tile Intact 7.0 POSITIVE 37 Interior Kitchen A Backsplash Tile Intact 10.0 POSITIVE 38 Interior Kitchen C Cabinet Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 39 Interior Kitchen C Cabinet Door Wood Intact 0.4 Negative 40 Interior Kitchen C Cabinet Shelf Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 41 Interior Kitchen C Countertop Tile Intact 8.1 POSITIVE 42 Interior Kitchen C Backsplash Tile Intact 7.6 POSITIVE 43 Interior Kitchen A Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative
44 Interior Kitchen B Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
45 Interior Kitchen C Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
46 Interior Kitchen D Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative
47 Interior Kitchen Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 48 Interior Kitchen Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 49 Exterior Laundry Room C Door Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 50 Exterior Laundry Room C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 51 Interior Laundry Room C Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 52 Interior Laundry Room C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.4 Negative 53 Interior Laundry Room A Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 54 Interior Laundry Room A Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 55 Interior Laundry Room A Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 56 Interior Laundry Room B Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 57 Interior Laundry Room C Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 58 Interior Laundry Room D Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 2 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 59 Interior Laundry Room Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 60 Interior Laundry Room Baseboard Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 61 Interior Bathroom 1 A Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
62 Interior Bathroom 1 A Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 63 Interior Bathroom 1 C Window Sill Tile Intact 0.3 Negative Vinyl 64 Interior Bathroom 1 D Cabinet Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 65 Interior Bathroom 1 D Cabinet Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 66 Interior Bathroom 1 D Cabinet Shelf Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 67 Interior Bathroom 1 A Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 68 Interior Bathroom 1 B Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 69 Interior Bathroom 1 C Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 70 Interior Bathroom 1 D Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 71 Interior Bathroom 1 Floor Tile Intact 0.2 Negative
72 Interior Bathroom 1 B Wall Tile Intact 0.2 Negative Shower 73 Interior Bathroom 1 C Wall Tile Intact 0.1 Negative Shower 74 Interior Bathroom 1 D Wall Tile Intact 0.1 Negative Shower 75 Interior Bathroom 1 Floor Tile Intact 0.2 Negative Shower 76 Interior Hall B Cabinet Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 77 Interior Hall B Cabinet Door Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 78 Interior Hall B Cabinet Shelf Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 79 Interior Hall C Closet Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative HVAC 80 Interior Hall C Closet Door Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative HVAC 81 Interior Hall A Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative
82 Interior Hall B Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative
83 Interior Hall C Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
84 Interior Hall D Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
85 Interior Hall Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative
86 Interior Hall Baseboard Wood Intact 0.3 Negative
87 Interior Hall Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.3 Negative
The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 3 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 88 Interior Hall Attic Access/Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 89 Interior Bedroom 1 A Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
90 Interior Bedroom 1 A Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 91 Exterior Bedroom 1 C Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
92 Exterior Bedroom 1 C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 93 Interior Bedroom 1 C Door Wood Intact 0.3 Negative
94 Interior Bedroom 1 C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 95 Interior Bedroom 1 C Threshold Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 96 Interior Bedroom 1 A Closet Door Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 97 Interior Bedroom 1 A Closet Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 98 Interior Bedroom 1 A Closet Shelf Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 99 Interior Bedroom 1 A Closet Shelf Support Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 100 Interior Bedroom 1 B Closet Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 101 Interior Bedroom 1 B Closet Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 102 Interior Bedroom 1 B Closet Shelf Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 103 Interior Bedroom 1 B Closet Shelf Support Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 104 Interior Bedroom 1 A Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 105 Interior Bedroom 1 B Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 106 Interior Bedroom 1 C Wall Plaster Intact 0.1 Negative 107 Interior Bedroom 1 D Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 108 Interior Bedroom 1 Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 109 Interior Bedroom 1 Baseboard Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 110 Interior Bedroom 1 Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.1 Negative 111 Interior Bathroom 2 D Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 112 Interior Bathroom 2 D Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 113 Interior Bathroom 2 C Window Sill Tile Intact 0.1 Negative Aluminum 114 Interior Bathroom 2 B Cabinet Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 115 Interior Bathroom 2 B Cabinet Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 116 Interior Bathroom 2 B Cabinet Shelf Wood Intact 0.1 Negative The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 4 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 117 Interior Bathroom 2 A Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 118 Interior Bathroom 2 B Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 119 Interior Bathroom 2 C Wall Plaster Intact 0.1 Negative 120 Interior Bathroom 2 D Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 121 Interior Bathroom 2 Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 122 Interior Bathroom 2 Baseboard Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 123 Interior Bathroom 2 Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 124 Interior Bathroom 2 Floor Tile Intact 0.5 Negative
125 Interior Bathroom 2 B Wall Tile Intact 0.1 Negative Shower 126 Interior Bathroom 2 C Wall Tile Intact 0.1 Negative Shower 127 Interior Bathroom 2 D Wall Tile Intact 0.1 Negative Shower 128 Interior Bedroom 2 C Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
129 Interior Bedroom 2 C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 130 Interior Bedroom 2 A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 131 Interior Bedroom 2 A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Casement 132 Interior Bedroom 2 A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Fixed 133 Interior Bedroom 2 A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Fixed 134 Interior Bedroom 2 A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Casement 135 Interior Bedroom 2 A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Casement 136 Interior Bedroom 2 C Closet Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 137 Interior Bedroom 2 C Closet Door Frame Wood Intact 0.4 Negative 138 Interior Bedroom 2 C Closet Shelf Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 139 Interior Bedroom 2 C Closet Shelf Support Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 140 Interior Bedroom 2 A Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative 141 Interior Bedroom 2 B Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 142 Interior Bedroom 2 C Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 143 Interior Bedroom 2 D Wall Plaster Intact 0.1 Negative 144 Interior Bedroom 2 Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 145 Interior Bedroom 2 Baseboard Wood Intact 0.2 Negative The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 5 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 146 Interior Bedroom 2 Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.3 Negative 147 Interior Bedroom 2 Chair Rail Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 148 Exterior Den A Door Wood Intact 0.1 Negative
149 Exterior Den A Door Frame Wood Intact 0.1 Negative
150 Exterior Den A Threshold Wood Intact 0.1 Negative
151 Interior Den A Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
152 Interior Den A Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative
153 Interior Den B Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
154 Interior Den B Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
155 Interior Den A Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
156 Interior Den B Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
157 Interior Den C Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative
158 Interior Den D Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
159 Interior Den Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative
160 Interior Den Baseboard Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
161 Interior Den Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.2 Negative
162 Interior Garage A Door Wood Intact 0.3 Negative
163 Interior Garage A Door Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 164 Interior Garage B Door Wood DETERIORATED 2.5 POSITIVE 165 Interior Garage B Door Frame Wood DETERIORATED 0.5 Negative 166 Interior Garage A Cabinet Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 167 Interior Garage C Cabinet Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 168 Interior Garage A Wall Gypsum Intact 0.1 Negative
169 Interior Garage B Wall Gypsum Intact 0.2 Negative
170 Interior Garage C Wall Gypsum Intact 0.1 Negative
171 Interior Garage D Wall Gypsum Intact 0.1 Negative
172 Interior Garage C Work Bench Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 173 Exterior Garage B Door Wood Intact 9.0 POSITIVE
174 Exterior Garage B Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 6 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 175 Interior Bedroom 3 C Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative
176 Interior Bedroom 3 C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 177 Interior Bedroom 3 C Closet Door Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 178 Interior Bedroom 3 C Closet Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 179 Interior Bedroom 3 C Closet Shelf Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 180 Interior Bedroom 3 C Closet Shelf Support Wood Intact 0.1 Negative 181 Interior Bedroom 3 A Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 182 Interior Bedroom 3 B Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative 183 Interior Bedroom 3 C Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 184 Interior Bedroom 3 D Wall Plaster Intact 0.1 Negative 185 Interior Bedroom 3 Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 186 Interior Bedroom 3 Baseboard Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 187 Interior Bedroom 3 Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 188 Interior Dining Room C Door Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 189 Interior Dining Room C Door Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 190 Interior Dining Room A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 191 Interior Dining Room A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Casement 192 Interior Dining Room A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.1 Negative Fixed 193 Interior Dining Room A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Fixed 194 Interior Dining Room A Window Sill Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Casement 195 Interior Dining Room A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Casement 196 Interior Dining Room A Wall Plaster Intact 0.3 Negative 197 Interior Dining Room B Wall Plaster Intact 0.4 Negative 198 Interior Dining Room C Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 199 Interior Dining Room D Wall Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 200 Interior Dining Room Ceiling Plaster Intact 0.2 Negative 201 Interior Dining Room Baseboard Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 202 Interior Dining Room Heater Vent Metal Intact 0.3 Negative 203 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Well Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 7 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 204 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Sash Metal Intact 0.1 Negative Casement 205 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 206 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Well Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Fixed 207 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Sash Metal Intact 0.1 Negative Fixed 208 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Fixed 209 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Well Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Casement 210 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Sash Metal Intact 0.1 Negative Casement 211 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 212 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Well Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 213 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Sash Metal Intact 0.1 Negative Casement 214 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 215 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Well Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Fixed 216 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Sash Metal Intact 0.1 Negative Fixed 217 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Fixed 218 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Well Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 219 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Sash Metal Intact 0.1 Negative Casement 220 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Frame Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 221 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Wall Stucco Intact 0.2 Negative 222 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Wall Stucco Intact 0.3 Negative 223 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Eaves Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 224 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Rafters Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 225 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Fascia Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 226 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Column Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 227 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Beam Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 228 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Ceiling Wood Intact 0.4 Negative 229 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Railing Metal Intact 0.3 Negative 230 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Window Well Wood Intact 0.2 Negative Bay Window 231 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Window Sash Wood Intact 0.3 Negative Bay Window 232 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Window Frame Metal Intact 0.3 Negative Bay Window The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 8 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
FIELD DATA REPORT
Project Name:Single Family Residence Project #:3100458
Address:
18602 Altrudy Lane
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Protocol:HUD
Sample Unit ID/Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 233 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Wall Stucco Intact 0.3 Negative 234 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Wall Stucco Intact 0.4 Negative 235 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Eaves Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 236 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Rafters Wood Intact 0.4 Negative 237 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Fascia Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 238 Perimeter Exterior West Side B Electric Panel/Frame Metal Intact 0.2 Negative 239 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Window Well Metal Intact 0.1 Negative Casement 240 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Window Sash Metal Intact 0.1 Negative Casement 241 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Window Frame Metal Intact 0.2 Negative Casement 242 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Window Well Metal Intact 0.2 Negative Fixed 243 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Window Sash Metal Intact 0.1 Negative Fixed 244 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Window Frame Metal Intact 0.2 Negative Fixed 245 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Wall Stucco Intact 0.2 Negative 246 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Wall Stucco Intact 0.3 Negative 247 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Eaves Wood Intact 0.2 Negative 248 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Rafters Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 249 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Fascia Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 250 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Column Metal Intact 0.1 Negative 251 Perimeter Exterior North Side C Ceiling Metal Intact 0.1 Negative 252 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Wall Stucco Intact 0.2 Negative 253 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Wall Stucco Intact 0.3 Negative 254 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Eaves Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 255 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Rafters Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 256 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Fascia Wood Intact 0.3 Negative 257 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Garage Door Wood DETERIORATED 0.3 Negative 258 Perimeter Exterior East Side D Garage Door Frame Wood DETERIORATED 0.3 Negative 259 Calibration Calibration End of Job 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Intact 1.0 POSITIVE 260 Calibration Calibration End of Job 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Intact 1.1 POSITIVE 261 Calibration Calibration End of Job 1.0 mg/cm2 Standard Wood Intact 1.1 POSITIVE The HUD action level for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2.
Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above of 1.0 mg/cm2.
Barr & Clark Environmental (714) 894-5700 9 12/6/2019 07:36:59 AM
APPENDIX
B
CDPH 8552
INSPECTOR’S CERTIFICATES
INSURANCE CERTIFICATE
State of California-Health and Human Services Agency
California Department of Public Health
LEAD HAZARD EVALUATION REPORT
Section 1-Date of Lead Hazard Evaluation 12/5/2019
Section 2-Type of Lead Hazard Evaluation (Check one box only) Lead inspection Risk assessment Clearance inspection Other (specify) Section 3-Structure Where Lead Hazard Evaluation Was Conducted Address (number, street, apartment (if applicable)
18602 Altrudy Lane
City
Yorba Linda
County
Orange
ZIP code
92886
Construction date (year) of
structure
1950
Type of structure (check one box only) Children Living in Structure? Multi-unit building School or Daycare Yes No
Single Family Dwelling Other (specify) Don’t Know Section 4-Owner of Structure (If business/agency, list contact person) Name
Kara Cawood
Telephone number
(714) 714-0638
Address [number, street, apartment (if applicable)]
18602 Altrudy Lane
City
Yorba Linda
State
CA
ZIP code
92886
Section 5-Results of Lead Hazard Evaluation (Check all that apply) No lead-based paint detected Intact Lead-based paint detected Deteriorated Lead-based paint detected
No lead hazards detected Lead Contaminated Dust Found Lead Contaminated Soil Found Other (specify)
Section 6-Individual Conducting Lead Hazard Evaluation
Name
Matthew Crochet
Telephone number
714-894-5700
Address (number, street, apartment (if applicable)
16531 Bolsa Chica, Suite 205
City
Huntington Beach
State
CA
ZIP code
92649
CDPH certification number
12 Signature
➢
Date
12/11/2019
Name and CDPH certification number of any other individuals conducting sampling or testing (if applicable) Dana Williams 25385
Section 7-Attachments
A. A foundation diagram or sketch of the structure indicating the specific locations of each lead hazard or presence of lead-based paint;
B. Each testing method, device, and sampling procedure used; C. All data collected, including quality control data, laboratory results, including laboratory name, address, and phone number.
First copy and attachments retained by inspector
Second copy and attachments retained by owner Third copy only (no attachments) mailed to:
California Department of Public Health
Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch Reports
850 Maria Bay Parkway, Building P, Third Floor
Richmond, CA 94804-6403 Fax (510) 620-5656
CDPH 8552 (6/07)
APPENDIX
C
MAP(S)
Living Room
Dining Room
Bedroom 3 Bedroom 2
Kitchen
Hall
Laundry Room
Bath 1 Bath 2 Bedroom 1
Den
Garage
N
CS FX CS CS FX CS CS FX CS CS FX CS
Bay
CS FX V V AL
A
C
B D
Window Key: AL = Aluminum
CS = Casement FX = Fixed V = Vinyl
Single Family Residence 18602 Altrudy Lane Yorba Linda, CA Project# 3100458
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
DATE: JUNE 3, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL KUDRON, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS NO. 6 - SENIOR MOBILITY PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 6 to the April 22, 2021, Agreement with CABCO Yellow Inc. effective June 3, 2025.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the Senior Mobility Program is to enhance transportation opportunities available to the senior citizens of Yorba Linda. The Yorba Linda Senior Mobility Program began in October of 2002, and is a door-to-door transportation service available for Yorba Linda residents ages sixty and older. This program is funded by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and the City of Yorba Linda. OCTA funds for the program are allocated based upon the participating agencies’ respective percentage of the senior population, 60 years and older, for the entire county. Agencies are required to contribute a minimum of 20% funding for the program, and 100% funding after the OCTA funds are expended.
DISCUSSION
CABCO Yellow, Inc. recently informed the City of Yorba Linda that they will be restructuring their business model due to recent developments in California law. As a result, CABCO Yellow Inc., dba California Yellow Cab, will become OCY Management, LLC. Therefore, the contract needs to be amended to reflect the name change. All other terms and conditions of the agreement remain in full force and effect. This action will not result in any changes to the Senior Mobility Program.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with Amendment No. 6.
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS NO. 6 - SENIOR MOBILITY PROGRAM
P a g e | 2
ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may not approve Amendments No. 6 and provide direction to staff.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Professional Services Agreement with CABCO Yellow Inc.- April 2021
2. Amendment No. 6 with CABCO Yellow Inc.
Amendment
No. 6
AMENDMENT NO. 6
AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO
CABCO YELLOW INC. AND THE CITY OF YORBA LINDA FOR
PROVIDING SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
This is Amendment No. 6 (“Amendment No. 6”) to that certain Cabco Yellow Inc. and the City of Yorba Linda For Providing Senior Transportation Services (“Agreement”) made on April 22, 2021 between the City of Yorba Linda (“City”) and Cabco Yellow Inc. (“Contractor”), which this Amendment No. 6 is made and entered into on June 3, 2025 to approve Amendment No. 6 to the agreement:
1. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment No. 6 shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.
2. Section 1, “Parties and Date” is amended to read as follows:
Parties and Date.
Effective June 3, 2025, OCY Management, LLC. is now the official name of the company, replacing Cabco Yellow Inc.
3. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.
4. This Amendment No. 6 may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement. (Signatures on Following Page)
AMENDMENT NO. 6
CITY OF YORBA LINDA OCY Management, LLC.
By: By:
Janice Lim
Mayor Name:
Title:
Attest:
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES, President OR
Vice President AND Secretary, AND CORPORATE
SEAL OF CONTRACTOR REQUIRED]
By:
Marcia Brown By:
City Clerk
Name:
Title:
Approved as to Form:
By:
Rutan & Tucker LLP
City Attorney
PLANNING COMMISSION | AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
MEETING DATE | MAY 28, 2025
Community Development Department
Planning Division
Director
Nate Farnsworth, AICP
4.1 APPROVAL OF MAY 14, 2025, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES A motion by Commissioner Goldfarb, second by Commissioner Chavez Marquez, to approve the minutes with minor modifications. The motion carried (3-0-1-1) with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Bernstein, Chavez Marquez, Goldfarb
NOES: None
ABSENT: Behura
ABSTAIN: Masterson
7.1 TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2024-02 & DESING REVIEW 2023-06 –
NORTH COUNTY CHABAD
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 19045 YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD
A request to approve the use and architectural design of two (2) detached parsonage homes and one (1) detached parsonage accessory dwelling unit, the proposed size for each structure being 3,848 square feet, 4,360 square feet, and 532 square feet respectively, as the final phase of the master development plan for the expansion of the North County Chabad Center.
A motion by Commissioner Goldfarb, second by Chair Pro Tem Masterson to adopt Resolution No. 5638 Time Extension for Conditional Use Permit 2024-02 & Design Review 2023-06 North County Chabad, subject to attached conditions of approval. The motion carried (3-0-1-1) with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Bernstein, Goldfarb, Masterson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Behura
ABSTAIN: Chavez Marquez
Speakers in favor: None
Speakers in opposition: None
7.2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2025-01 – AHMAD
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 20620 Manzanita Avenue
Behura arrived at 6:40 p.m.
A request to exceed the maximum three-foot (3’) height limitation for wall/fencing within the twenty five-foot (25’) front yard setback to permit a combination retaining wall varying in height from four feet (4’) to five feet six inches (5’-6).
A motion by Chair Pro Tem Masterson, second by Commissioner Behura to adopt Resolution No. 5639 Conditional Use Permit 2025-01 Ahmad, subject to attached conditions of approval. The motion carried (5-0) with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Bernstein, Behura, Chavez Marquez, Goldfarb, Masterson NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Speakers in favor: None
Speakers in opposition: None
7.3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2025-09 – DUNN
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4925 FAIRWOOD CIRCLE
A request to construct a 60 square foot second-story addition and a new 549 square foot second-story deck to an existing 3,685 square foot two-story single-family residence, the area of construction within seventy feet (70’) of another single-family residence.
A motion by Chair Pro Tem Masterson, second by Commissioner Behura to adopt Resolution No. 5640 Conditional Use Permit 2025-09 Dunn, subject to attached conditions. The motion carried (5-0) with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Bernstein, Behura, Chavez Marquez, Goldfarb, Masterson NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Speakers in favor: None
Speakers in opposition: None
7.4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2025-15 – OCHOA
A request to construct a 418 square foot second story room addition and a new 232 square foot second story deck located on the rear of the existing 2,768 square foot two-story residence, the area of second story construction within seventy feet (70’) of another dwelling.
A motion by Chair Pro Tem Masterson, second by Commissioner Goldfarb to adopt Resolution No. 5641 Conditional Use Permit 2025-15 Ochoa, subject to the attached conditions. The motion carried (5-0) with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Bernstein, Behura, Chavez Marquez, Goldfarb, Masterson NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Speakers in favor: None
Speakers in opposition: None
Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 7:19 p.m. to the June 11, 2025, Planning Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m.
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
DATE: JUNE 3, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MARCIA BROWN, CMC, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: COMMITTEE AND AGENCY REPORTS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report.
DISCUSSION
City Council members serve on a number of outside committees and agencies. Attached are updates received recently from these agencies.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Reports from City Council Organizations, Agencies and Committees
C O U N C I L C O M M I T T E E A N D A G E N C Y R E P O R T S No Committee or Agency reports were submitted by deadline.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DATE: JUNE 3, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JAMIE LAI, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER PREPARED BY: JESSE GUTIERREZ, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
MANAGER
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-5943, ORDERING THE COSTS FOR CERTAIN
IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITYWIDE YORBA LINDA LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE RAISED
THROUGH INSTALLMENTS OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS, THE
CONFIRMATION OF THE DIAGRAM BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENTS
FOR FY 2025/2026 FOR THE CITYWIDE YORBA LINDA LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (LMAD)
OVERRULING ALL PROTESTS CONCERNING THE ASSESSMENTS, AND
LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS CONFIRMED HEREIN
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt proposed Resolution No. 2025-5943 (Attachment 1), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, ordering that the costs for certain improvements in the Citywide Yorba Linda Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District shall be raised through installments over a period of years, confirming the diagram boundaries and assessments for FY 2025/2026 for the Citywide Yorba Linda Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District, overruling all protests concerning the assessments, and levying the assessments confirmed herein.
BACKGROUND
The City’s Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD) was formed pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), which is included in the State of California Streets and Highways Code Division 15, Part 2, and the provisions of the California Constitution, Article XIII D (commonly referred to as Proposition 218).
Although consolidated into a single assessment district, the LMAD is comprised of various traffic signals, lighting, and landscaping benefit zones, which address the variations in the nature, location, and the extent of the improvements that provide special benefits to parcels in the LMAD. Within the boundaries of the LMAD, parcels are assigned to various Zones, each of which is associated with a set of improvements and/or type of improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that zone.
R E S O L U T I O N N O . 2 0 2 5 - 5 9 4 3 , O R D E R I N G T H E C O S T S F O R
C E R T A I N I M P R O V E M E N T S I N T H E C I T Y W I D E Y O R B A L I N D A
L I G H T I N G A N D L A N D S C A P I N G M A I N T E N A N C E A S S E S S M E N T
D I S T R I C T T O B E R A I S E D T H R O U G H I N S T A L L M E N T S O V E R A
P E R I O D O F Y E A R S , T H E C O N F I R M A T I O N O F T H E D I A G R A M B O U N D A R I E S A N D A S S E S S M E N T S F O R F Y 2 0 2 5 / 2 0 2 6 F O R T H E
C I T Y W I D E Y O R B A L I N D A L I G H T I N G A N D L A N D S C A P I N G
M A I N T E N A N C E A S S E S S M E N T D I S T R I C T ( L M A D ) O V E R R U L I N G A L L
P R O T E S T S C O N C E R N I N G T H E A S S E S S M E N T S , A N D L E V Y I N G T H E
A S S E S S M E N T S C O N F I R M E D H E R E I N
P a g e | 2
At the May 6, 2025, City Council meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025- 5937 declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within the City's LMAD for FY 2025/2026 and setting a time and place for a public hearing concerning the levy of annual assessments to be June 3, 2025. Also, at the May 6, 2025, City Council meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-5936, approving the Engineer's Report regarding the levy of an annual assessment with the City's LMAD for FY 2025/2026.
DISCUSSION
At this Public Hearing, all public comments, and written protests regarding the LMAD and the annual levy of assessments will be heard. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code § 22630, during the course or upon the conclusion of the public hearing on June 3, 2025, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the FY 2025/2026 Engineer's Report (Attachment 2). The assessments, if approved, will be submitted to the Orange County Auditor/Controller by August 8, 2025, to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.
By adopting the proposed Resolution No. 2025-5943, the City Council is confirming the levying of assessments and authorizing that the estimated costs associated with certain improvements in the LMAD, in all Zones, be collected in installments (not to exceed five fiscal years) and held in a reserve account for future use of said improvements, as identified in the City's LMAD Capital Improvement Program included as an exhibit to the approved Resolution 2025-5943 which was approved by the City Council at the May 6, 2025 City Council meeting. After considering any public comments and written protests, staff recommend the City Council adopt proposed Resolution No. 2025-5943.
FISCAL IMPACT
As identified in the Engineer's Report, the total estimated annual LMAD assessments for FY 2025/2026 amount to $10,195,801.00. The General Benefit portion that the City must pay from the General Fund has been calculated to be $1,344,182.00. This amount is budgeted as a transfer from the General Fund to the LMAD Fund, less a partially offsetting credit for a portion of the ad valorem property tax revenue collected in local landscaping zones L-4A and L-4B, the arterial landscaping zones, and the lighting and traffic signal zones. The net transfer from the General Fund is projected to be $1,039,509.00, which has been included for consideration in the proposed General Fund budget for FY 2025/2026. It should also be noted that this amount will be adjusted at the end of the fiscal year based on actual ad valorem property tax revenue received during FY 2025/2026.
City staff and Willdan Financial Services, Inc., have completed an analysis of the current
R E S O L U T I O N N O . 2 0 2 5 - 5 9 4 3 , O R D E R I N G T H E C O S T S F O R
C E R T A I N I M P R O V E M E N T S I N T H E C I T Y W I D E Y O R B A L I N D A
L I G H T I N G A N D L A N D S C A P I N G M A I N T E N A N C E A S S E S S M E N T
D I S T R I C T T O B E R A I S E D T H R O U G H I N S T A L L M E N T S O V E R A
P E R I O D O F Y E A R S , T H E C O N F I R M A T I O N O F T H E D I A G R A M B O U N D A R I E S A N D A S S E S S M E N T S F O R F Y 2 0 2 5 / 2 0 2 6 F O R T H E
C I T Y W I D E Y O R B A L I N D A L I G H T I N G A N D L A N D S C A P I N G
M A I N T E N A N C E A S S E S S M E N T D I S T R I C T ( L M A D ) O V E R R U L I N G A L L
P R O T E S T S C O N C E R N I N G T H E A S S E S S M E N T S , A N D L E V Y I N G T H E
A S S E S S M E N T S C O N F I R M E D H E R E I N
P a g e | 3
fiscal condition of the local landscaping zones based on the FY 2025/2026 Engineer's Report. This analysis has confirmed that there are no local landscaping zones in which assessments and/or fund balance on hand are likely to be insufficient to cover the cost of providing maintenance services beyond the Fiscal Year. As noted previously, Local Landscaping Zone L-1A has budgeted expenditure exceeding projected available revenues.
It is anticipated that a petition process will be initiated by the residents this year to address the budgetary issue before the close of FY 2025/2026.
ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may consider the following alternatives:
1. Do not approve the Engineer's Report as presented and direct staff to make changes to the Report. The assessments, if approved, will be submitted to the Orange County Auditor/Controller by August 8, 2025, to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel. If an Engineer's Report is not approved in time, this may not allow the collection of assessment proceeds for FY 2025/2026 to contribute towards the higher cost of maintaining streetlights and landscaping.
2. Do not levy the assessment and forego the revenue for FY 2025/2026.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2025-5943
Attachment 2 – Yorba Linda FY 2025/2026 Engineer’s Report
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - 5943
PAGE 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-5943
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
YORBA LINDA, CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
ACT OF 1972, ORDERING THAT THE COSTS FOR
CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITYWIDE YORBA
LINDA LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SHALL BE RAISED THROUGH
INSTALLMENTS OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS,
CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER’S REPORT DIAGRAM
BOUNDARIES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR
2025/2026 FOR THE CITYWIDE YORBA LINDA LIGHTING
AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT, OVERRULING ALL PROTESTS CONCERNING
THE ASSESSMENTS, AND LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS
CONFIRMED HEREIN
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2025-5933 of the City Council of the City of Yorba Linda initiated proceedings to levy the annual assessments for the Yorba Linda Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District (the "District"); and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2025-5933 also ordered the City Engineer to prepare the report required by Streets and Highways Code Section 22622; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Engineer’s Report by adopting Resolution No. 2025-5936 on May 6, 2025; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2025-5937, the City Council declared its intention to levy and collect assessments within the District for Fiscal Year 2025/2026, and provide notice pursuant to applicable law of a Public Hearing of the City Council on the matter; and
WHEREAS, in Resolution No. 2025-5937, the City Council also set the Public Hearing for June 3, 2025, at 6:30 p.m.; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk caused Notice of the Public Hearing to be given in the manner provided by applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the updated engineer’s report, all oral statements and all written protests and communication made or filed by any interested person concerning the proposed assessments in the District for Fiscal Year 2025/2026; and
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - 5943
PAGE 2
WHEREAS, the City Council considered all public testimony presented at the Public Hearing and received and considered all written protests and evidence presented or filed at said Hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Yorba Linda resolves as follows:
Section 1. The foregoing recitals are incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 22631, the City Council hereby confirms the diagram boundaries and assessments for the Yorba Linda Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2025/2026. Pursuant to Streets and Highway Code section 22630, the City Council approves of the changes and updated financial information, if any, in the Annual Engineer’s Report.
Section 3. In accordance with Streets and Highways Code Section 22660(a), the City Council has determined that the estimated cost of certain proposed improvements, described in Section 22525, subdivisions (a) through (d), are greater than can conveniently be raised from a single assessment and, as a result, shall be collected in installments over a period not to exceed five fiscal years and held in a reserve account, as noted in the Engineer’s Report. General descriptions of these improvements for all Zones in the District, as well as the estimated costs thereof, the number of annual installments and years during which they are to be collected, and the maximum amount of each annual installment, are described in the City’s LMAD Capital Improvement Program approved by the City Council on June 3, 2025, and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference, and attached hereto as Attachment A.
Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Resolution and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Additionally, if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone of the Report is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of the Report and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, portions, zones, or subzones might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 5. The City Council hereby overrules all protests presented concerning the annual assessments for the District for Fiscal Year 2025/2026.
Section 6. Passage of this Resolution shall constitute a levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/2026. A copy of the assessments which specify the amounts levied is on file
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - 5943
PAGE 3
in the Office of the City Clerk and is incorporated herein and made a part hereof as though fully set forth.
Section 7. The City Council finds that the assessment is in compliance with the provision of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution, and that the City Council has complied with all laws pertaining to the levy of an annual assessment.
Section 8. The City Council orders the proposed District improvements to be made in accordance with said Annual Engineer’s Report and these proceedings.
Section 9. The City Council finds that the Southern California Edison Company is the practical contractor capable of furnishing street lighting improvements, and authorization is hereby granted to continue with said contractor.
Section 10. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to update the Annual Engineer’s Report and assessments to the most current available parcel listings as provided by the County Auditor’s office.
Section 11. Pursuant to applicable law, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution, and the diagrams (boundaries) and assessments confirmed by this Resolution of a certified copy thereof, with the County Auditor/Assessor/Tax Collector of the County of Orange.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Yorba Linda on this 3RD day of June, 2025. ______________________________________
JANICE LIM, MAYOR
CITY OF YORBA LINDA
ATTEST:
MARCIA BROWN, CITY CLERK
CITY OF YORBA LINDA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RUTAN & TUCKER LLP
_____________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - 5943
PAGE 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, MARCIA BROWN, City Clerk of the City of Yorba Linda, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Yorba Linda held on the 3RD day of June, 2025, and was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
_________________________________
MARCIA BROWN, CITY CLERK
CITY OF YORBA LINDA
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - 5943
PAGE 5
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - 5943
PAGE 6
City of Yorba Linda
Street Lighting and Landscaping
Maintenance District
Annual Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Intent Meeting: May 06, 2025
Public Hearing: June 03, 2025
APRIL 2025
PREPARED BY
WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES
27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T. 951.587.3500|800.755.6864
F. 951.587.3510|888.326.6864
Property Tax Information Line
T.866.807.6864
www.willdan.com Page 360 of 524
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
City of Yorba Linda
Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District
For
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
City of Yorba Linda,
County of Orange, State of California
This Report and the enclosed descriptions, budgets and diagram outline the proposed improvements and assessments for the Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District in the City of Yorba Linda for fiscal year 2025/2026, which includes each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within said District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Orange County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this ____________ day of ______________, 2025.
Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Yorba Linda
By: ________________________________
Jim McGuire
Principal Consultant, Project Manager
By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
PE # C 81888
Table of Contents
Introduction.........................................................................................................1 District Changes for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 ..................................................................1 Report Content and Annual Proceedings................................................................ 2 Part I - Plans and Specifications..............................................................6 Zones of Benefit ........................................................................................................ 6 Description of Improvements ................................................................................... 7 Part II - Method of Apportionment .........................................................28 Legislative Authority and Provisions..................................................................... 28 Benefit Analysis....................................................................................................... 29 Assessment Methodology ...................................................................................... 34 Part III - Estimate of Costs......................................................................55 Part IV - Assessment Roll.......................................................................68 Part V - Assessment Diagrams ..............................................................69 Local Landscaping Zones....................................................................................... 70 Arterial Landscaping Zones ................................................................................. 106 Arterial Street Lighting Zone ................................................................................ 116 Local Street Lighting Zone ................................................................................... 117 Traffic Signal Zones .............................................................................................. 118 Appendix A - Historical District Changes............................................ 119
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Introduction
The City of Yorba Linda (“City”), under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”) and the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIII D (“California Constitution”), annually levies and collects special assessments for the City’s maintenance assessment district designated as:
Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District
(“District”) in order to provide and maintain various landscaping and lighting improvements throughout the City that provide special benefits to properties within the City.
In accordance with the 1972 Act, the District utilizes benefit zones (“Zones”) to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements that provide special benefits to parcels in the District. Within the boundaries of the District, parcels are assigned to various Zones, each of which is associated with a set of improvements and/or type of improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone.
In fiscal year 2024/2025, the District was comprised of the following Zones:
➢ Nine Arterial Landscaping Zones (A-1 through A-9);
➢ Thirty-three Local Landscaping Zones:
• L-1A, through L-1E;
• L-2A through L-2V;
• Zone L-3;
• L-4A and L-4B;
• L-5A, L-5B and L-5C;
➢ A single citywide Arterial Street Lighting Zone,
➢ A non-contiguous Local Street Lighting Zone, and
➢ Three Traffic Signal Zones (TS-1, TS-2, and TS-3),
District Changes for Fiscal Year 2025/2026
For fiscal year 2025/2026, the following District changes have been implemented:
L-1B: In Local Landscaping Zone L-1B, the slope area landscaping west of Camino de Bryant and north of the railroad was adjusted to exclude the portion of this area that was within the railroad right-of-way located along the southern edge of this landscaped area (and thus the boundary of the Zone). This eliminated approximately 72,400 square feet of landscape area that was previously maintained at a reduced service level.
L-2A: The assessment diagram for Local Landscaping Zone L-2A was updated to reflect the removal of the area north of Falconridge Road and northeast of Rimcrest Drive (approximately 111,835 square feet of landscape area) that had actually been vacated in fiscal year 2023/2024 and reflected in the maintenance budgets and improvement square footage since that time but not reflect in the fiscal year 2024/2025 L-2A diagram.
L-2Q: The assessment diagram for Local Landscaping Zone L-2Q as well as the related maintenance budget and improvement square footage applied was updated to reflect the removal
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
of the landscape corner return area on the northeast corner of Bastanchury Road and Fairmont Boulevard, which is maintained by the homeowner’s association and not the District. (Approximately 725 square feet of flat parkway landscaping.) L-2Q: The assessment diagram for Local Landscaping Zone L-2Q as well as the related maintenance budget and improvement square footage applied was updated to reflect the removal of the landscape corner return area on the northwest corner of Bastanchury Road and Village Center Drive, which is maintained by the homeowner’s association and not the District. (Approximately 940 square feet of flat parkway landscaping.) Minor modifications to the diagrams for Local Landscaping Zones L-2I, L-2K North , L-2O, L-2P, and L-2S were made which may include the addition of more street names or expansion of the surrounding areas or zones for reference purposes, and/or updated parcel configurations as a result of parcel changes.
No other notable or consequential changes to the District and/or improvements have occurred since the adoption of the fiscal year 2024/2025 Engineer's Report.
Report Content and Annual Proceedings
This Engineer’s Annual Report (“Report”) has been prepared pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 4 and Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act, and presented to the City Council for their consideration and approval of the proposed improvements and services to be provided within the District and the levy and collection of annual assessments related thereto for fiscal year 2025/2026. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone of this Report is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of the Report and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, portions, zones, or subzones might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
This Report outlines the District Zone structure, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied in connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for fiscal year 2025/2026. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a funding source for the continued operation and maintenance of landscaping and lighting improvements within various zones of benefit (“Zones”) that provide special benefits to the properties within the District and each respective Zone. Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate, and service the improvements and based upon available revenues including fund balances, general benefit contributions and additional City contributions and assessment limits. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include, but are not limited to the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District; deficits or surpluses from prior years; revenues from other sources; and the collection of funds for operational reserves or for periodic maintenance and improvement rehabilitation projects as authorized by the 1972 Act.
Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.
Each Zone outlined in this Report reflects the various improvements and the types of improvements and services to be provided by the District for the properties that are directly associated with and benefit from those improvements. The net annual cost to provide the
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
improvements in each Zone is based on the various improvements and the types of improvements and services to be provided by the District and the net special benefit cost of providing those improvements and services are allocated to the benefiting properties within the Zone using a weighted method of apportionment (refer to Assessment Methodology in Part II, Method of Apportionment) that calculates the proportional special benefit and assessment for each parcel as compared to other properties that benefit from the District improvements and services.
The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Orange County Assessor’s Office. The Orange County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the District assessments.
At a noticed annual Public Hearing, the City Council will accept all public comments and written protests regarding the District and the annual levy of assessments. Based on those public comments and written protests, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report and confirmation of the assessments the Council will, by Resolution, order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessments as approved will be submitted to the Orange County Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.
As required by the 1972 Act, this Engineer’s Report describes the improvements to be provided, maintained, and serviced by the District, an estimated budget for the District improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District for fiscal year 2025/2026.
While the budgets outlined in this Report reflect the estimated costs necessary to fully and adequately provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements within the District, in some circumstances the estimated costs and associated services cannot be fully funded by the combination of the current special benefit assessment revenues and the City contribution for general benefits. Therefore, in addition to the City’s contribution for general benefit costs, on a case by case basis, at the discretion of the City Council, the City may also provide additional funding to support the improvements and/or implement service reductions for the fiscal year. To fully fund the improvements that are considered special benefits, it may be necessary in the future to increase assessment revenues which would require the support of the property owners for new or increased assessments through a ballot proceeding conducted under the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIII D.
This Report consists of five (5) parts:
Part I
Plans and Specifications: This section provides a general description of the District and the improvements for which parcels are assessed. The proposed assessments as outlined in this Report are based on the improvements and appurtenant facilities that provide a special benefit to the properties within the District and generally consist of local and arterial landscaping improvements, arterial and local street lighting, traffic signals and operational expenses authorized pursuant to the 1972 Act. The plans and specifications contained in this Report generally describe the nature and extent of the improvements. In conjunction with these general descriptions of the improvements a visual depiction of the landscape improvement areas is provided in “Part V- Assessment Diagrams” of this Report. More detailed information regarding
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
the specific plans and specifications associated with the District improvements in each Zone may be on file in the Public Works Department and by reference are made part of this Report.
Part II
Method of Apportionment: This section includes a discussion of the general and special benefits associated with the various improvements to be provided within the District (Benefit Analysis), which includes a discussion of the proportional costs of the special benefits and a separation of costs considered to be of general benefit (and therefore not assessed). This section of the Report also outlines the method of calculating each property’s proportional special benefit necessary to calculate the property’s annual assessment. This method of apportionment is consistent with the previously adopted method of apportionment for the District that was approved by the property owners in a protest ballot proceeding conducted in 1997 as well as subsequent Property Owner Protest Ballot Proceedings conducted for increased assessments in individual Zones pursuant to the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIII D.
Part III
Estimate of Costs: An estimate of the annual costs to operate, maintain, and service the landscaping and lighting improvements and appurtenant facilities. The budget for each Zone includes an estimate of the maintenance costs and incidental expenses including, but not limited to, labor, materials, utilities, equipment, and administration expenses as well as the collection of other appropriate funding authorized by the 1972 Act, and deemed necessary to fully support the improvements, even though not all costs identified in these budgets are necessarily supported by the current assessment revenues. Those improvements and/or costs determined to be of general benefit shall be funded by a City contribution. In addition to the general benefit costs, the City may provide additional funding to support the maintenance and operation of the improvements that are considered to be of special benefit, but City staff shall make the determination of which improvements, and the extent of the services and activities that shall be provided based on available revenues.
Part IV
Assessment Roll: The assessment amounts to be levied and collected in fiscal year 2025/2026 for each parcel is based on the parcel’s calculated proportional special benefit as outlined in "Part II - Method of Apportionment" and the annual assessment rates established by the estimated budgets in "Part III - Estimate of Costs" of this Report. Due to the number of parcels within the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2025/2026 has been filed electronically with the City Clerk rather than displayed in this Report and by reference the listing of the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and the corresponding assessment amounts are made part of this Report.
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Part V
Assessment Diagrams: This section of the Report contains a series of diagrams showing the boundaries of the Zones within the District for fiscal year 2025/2026 which incorporate the parcels determined to receive special benefits from the various District improvements. For those Zones that provide landscape improvements, the diagrams also provide a visual depiction of the location and extent of the landscaped areas being maintained. Parcel identification, the lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within the District and Zones are shown on the Orange County Assessor's Parcel Maps and shall include any subsequent lot line adjustments or parcel changes therein. Reference is hereby made to the Orange County Assessor’s Parcel Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the District.
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Part I - Plans and Specifications
The territory within the District consists of all lots or parcels of land within the City of Yorba Linda and the boundaries of the District are coterminous with the City boundaries. The purpose of this District is to provide in part, through annual assessments, funding for the ongoing operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, street lighting, traffic signal improvements and related facilities and services in various areas throughout the City. Improvements currently provided within the District generally include, but are not limited to:
➢ Landscape improvements within the street medians and parkway side-panels, including parkways, slopes, and entryways; and various non-street landscaping including greenbelt areas, slopes, local trails, and open space areas within various landscape zones. These landscape improvements and areas may include but are not limited to various combinations of trees; turf; ground cover; shrubs, plantings and other amenities including retaining walls, monuments, fencing, sidewalks, stamped concrete, or pavers; irrigation and drainage systems; and related appurtenances.
➢ Lighting facilities on the public streets within the City, including both street lights and traffic signals. These lighting improvements may include but are not limited to street lights located on the City’s arterial streets, traffic signals located throughout the City and local street lights within or adjacent to the various developments and subdivisions.
Zones of Benefit
In accordance with the 1972 Act, the District utilizes Zones to address variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements that provide special benefits to parcels in the District.
Within the boundaries of the District, parcels are assigned to benefit zones, each of which is associated with a set of improvements and/or type of improvements that provide special benefit to properties within that Zone.
Prior to fiscal year 2012/2013, the District included twelve designated Zones in order to identify and budget for the various improvements being provided within the District and the relationship and benefits to properties within the District. These twelve Zones included a citywide Arterial Landscaping Zone and Arterial Street Lighting Zone; three Traffic Signal Zones (TS-1, TS-2, and TS-3); a noncontiguous Local Street Lighting Zone; and six Local Landscaping Zones designated as L-1, L-2, L-3, L-4, L-5 and L-5A. Commencing in fiscal year 2012/2013, an ongoing annual review and evaluation of the improvements and properties within the District has been conducted.
As a result, several modifications have been implemented in the District to clarify and more clearly identify the specific improvements directly associated with and that provide special benefits to the properties within the District as well as the general benefits associated with those improvements.
The implementation of these changes since fiscal year 2012/2013, has reorganized the previously established twelve Zones into forty-seven Zones without directly facilitating an increase to the previously approved maximum assessment rates in most cases.
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
For fiscal year 2025/2026, the District continues to be comprised of forty-seven (47) benefit zones (Zones) including:
➢ Nine Arterial Landscaping Zones (A-1 through A-9);
➢ Thirty-three Local Landscaping Zones:
• L-1A, through L-1E;
• L-2A through L-2V;
• Zone L-3;
• L-4A and L-4B;
• L-5A, L-5B and L-5C;
➢ A single citywide Arterial Street Lighting Zone,
➢ A non-contiguous Local Street Lighting Zone, and
➢ Three Traffic Signal Zones (TS-1, TS-2, and TS-3),
Description of Improvements
As authorized by the 1972 Act, the improvements provided by the District and associated with each Zone incorporate various landscaping or lighting improvements that are maintained and serviced for the benefit of real property within the District. The maintenance of the landscape improvements may also include various appurtenances that may include but are not limited to entry monuments; various types of fencing; retaining walls; ornamental lighting or other ornamental fixtures; signage; and irrigation, drainage, and electrical equipment. In most cases, these improvements were either installed in direct connection with the development of properties within the Zones or were installed for the benefit of those properties as a result of property development or potential development of those properties and were considered necessary for the development of those properties to their full and best use. The work to be performed within each respective Zone may include but is not limited to (as applicable), the personnel, materials, equipment, electricity, water, contract services, repair and rehabilitation of the improvements and incidental expenses required to operate the District and provide improvements and services for each Zone. The improvements provided within the District and for which parcels receive special benefits are generally described in the following.
Street Light Improvements
The street lighting system in the City of Yorba Linda currently consists of 6,172 street lights (mostly Edison-owned) and the cost of operating and maintaining the street lights including energy costs are funded in part by the District’s annual assessments. Within the District there are two (2) Street Light Zones, designated as the Arterial Street Lighting Zone and the Local Street Lighting Zone. The following is a summary of the two Zones and the street light improvements generally provided in each.
Arterial Street Lighting Zone
The boundaries of the Arterial Street Lighting Zone are coterminous with the City boundaries and all parcels within the City (excluding lots and parcels of land identified as exempt) are proportionately assessed for the net-special benefit costs for the operation and maintenance of
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
these improvements. The following is a summary of the street lights currently included in the Arterial Street Lighting Zone:
Local Street Lighting Zone
Although the Local Street Lighting Zone is also considered a city-wide zone, only parcels that receive special benefits from local street lighting improvements are proportionately assessed for the net special benefit cost of providing those improvements and are designated as “Local Street Lighting Zone A”. All other parcels in the City (parcels that do not receive special benefits from local street lighting improvements and are not assessed) are designated as “Local Street Lighting Zone B” parcels for administration purposes only (not an actual Zone). The following is a summary of the street lighting improvements currently included in the Local Street Lighting Zone for which parcels are proportionately assessed:
Type of Light Wattage Total No.
of Lights
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 31 39
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 39 75
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 71 180
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 82 751
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 90 3
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 105 15
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 136 12
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 155 4
Total Lights 1,079
Type of Light Size in
Lumens
Total No.
of Lights
High Pressure Sodium Vapor 4,000 2
High Pressure Sodium Vapor 5,800 3,521
High Pressure Sodium Vapor 9,500 13
High Pressure Sodium Vapor 16,000 37
High Pressure Sodium Vapor 22,000 142
High Pressure Sodium Vapor 27,500 73
High Pressure Sodium Vapor 37,000 2
Total Lights 3,790
Type of Light Wattage Total No.
of Lights
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 31 1,140
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 39 14
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 71 18
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 82 101
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 100 23
Light Emitting Diodes (LED) 136 7
Total Lights 1,303
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
Traffic Signal Improvements
Within the District there are three (3) Traffic Signal Zones, designated as TS-1, TS-2 and TS-3, the boundaries of which collectively are coterminous with the City boundaries. Each of the three Traffic Signal Zones include traffic signal improvements on the City’s major thoroughfares at specific intersections within the boundaries of each respective Zone that serve as the primary access points to the properties assessed within these Zones. The following is a listing of the traffic signal locations (intersections) currently included in each Traffic Signal Zone.
Traffic Signal Zone TS-1
The zone is located on the eastern side of the City and the proportional special benefit assessments on parcels within this Zone currently fund in part the ongoing maintenance and operation of the traffic signals located at the following intersections:
➢ La Palma Avenue and Via Lomas de Yorba East;
➢ La Palma Avenue and Via Lomas de Yorba West;
➢ La Palma Avenue and Gypsum Canyon Road; and
➢ La Palma Avenue and Mercado Del Rio.
Traffic Signal Zone TS-2
The zone comprises the majority of the properties within the City (both the central and western portions of the City) as well as the majority of the City’s traffic signals. The proportional special benefit assessments on parcels within this Zone currently fund in part the ongoing maintenance and operation of the traffic signals located at the following intersections:
➢ Imperial Highway and Prospect Avenue;
➢ Imperial Highway and Bastanchury Road;
➢ Imperial Highway and Valley View Avenue;
➢ Imperial Highway and Casa Loma Avenue;
➢ Imperial Highway and Eureka Avenue;
➢ Imperial Highway and Lemon Drive;
➢ Imperial Highway and Lemon Drive East;
➢ Imperial Highway and Olinda Street;
➢ Imperial Highway and Yorba Linda Boulevard;
➢ Imperial Highway and Kellogg Drive;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Linda Vista Street (cost shared with the City of Placentia); ➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Rose Drive (cost shared with the City of Placentia); ➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Prospect Avenue (cost shared with the City of Placentia); ➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Jefferson Street (cost shared with the City of Placentia); ➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Van Buren Street;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Richfield Road;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Valley View Avenue;
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Casa Loma Avenue;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Casa Loma Circle;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Eureka Avenue;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Mountain View Avenue;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Lakeview Avenue;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Avocado Avenue;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Ohio Street;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Palm Avenue;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Kellogg Drive;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Fairmont Boulevard;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Avenida Rio Del Oro;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Village Center Drive;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Paseo De Las Palomas;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and San Antonio Road;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Yorba Ranch Road;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Via Esquela;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Stonehaven Drive;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Avenida Adobe;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and New River Road;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard and Via Del Agua
➢ Fairmont Boulevard and Paseo De Las Palomas;
➢ Fairmont Boulevard and Village Center Drive/Nob Hill; ➢ Fairmont Connector and Esperanza Road;
➢ Fairmont Boulevard and Fairmont Connector;
➢ Fairmont Boulevard and Old Ranch Road;
➢ Fairmont Boulevard and Futura Drive;
➢ Esperanza Road and Lindsey Drive;
➢ Esperanza Road and New River;
➢ Lakeview Avenue and Lemon Drive;
➢ Lakeview Avenue and Town Center Drive;
➢ Mountain View Avenue and Kellogg Drive;
➢ Rose Drive and Wabash Avenue;
➢ Rose Drive School Crossing (at Rose Drive School);
➢ Rose Drive Pedestrian Crossing (at El Cajon Trail);
➢ Valley View Avenue and Orange Drive;
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
➢ Valley View Avenue and Lakeview Avenue;
➢ Valley View Avenue and Bastanchury Road;
➢ Valley View Avenue and Pedestrian Crossing (EL Cajon Trail); ➢ Bastanchury Road and Prospect Avenue;
➢ Bastanchury Road and Rose Drive;
➢ Bastanchury Road and Lakeview Avenue;
➢ Bastanchury Road and Fairmont Boulevard;
➢ Bastanchury Road and Village Center Drive;
➢ Bastanchury Road and Secretariat Way;
➢ Bastanchury Road and Grey Stone Drive;
➢ Bastanchury Road and Clydesdale Drive;
➢ Bastanchury Road and Plumosa Drive
➢ Bastanchury Road and Yorba Linda High School
➢ Bastanchury Road and Casa Loma Avenue
➢ Bastanchury Road and Eureka Avenue
➢ Buena Vista Avenue and Richfield Road; and
➢ Grandview and Kellogg Drive.
Traffic Signal Zone TS-3
The zone is located in the southeastern section of the City and the proportional special benefit assessments on parcels within this Zone currently fund in part the ongoing maintenance and operation of a single traffic signal located at:
➢ Savi Ranch Parkway and Mirage Street.
Landscape Improvements
Arterial Landscaping Zone
Within the District there are nine (9) designated Arterial Landscaping Zones (A-1 through A-9), the boundaries of which collectively are coterminous with the City boundaries. Each of these nine Arterial Landscaping Zones have been established to reflect the proportional special benefit properties within the District receive from the District maintained arterial landscaping improvements. The boundaries of each Arterial Landscaping Zone are based on the improvements being maintained through the District assessments and the relationship and proximity of the developments and properties that derive special benefit from those improvements. The location, extent and types of improvements and the proximity of the various parcels and developments to those improvements were evaluated in developing the boundaries of the nine Zones and proportional special benefit cost allocations and most of the Zones are separated by streets that are considered primary arterials or other thoroughfares that may be considered secondary arterials. Therefore, some improvements (specifically medians) may be located between two Zones and those improvements would be shared by those two adjacent Zones. In such cases, the special benefit and cost of providing such improvements are proportionately shared by parcels in both Zones. However, because the extent and type of landscaping on either side of these streets (parkways, side panels, or adjacent landscape areas)
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
may often times be dramatically different, the special benefit and the costs associated with these improvements on primary arterial streets are assigned and allocated to the adjacent Arterial Landscaping Zone. On other thoroughfares (including secondary arterials) these parkways, side panels, or adjacent landscape areas, are typically funded by the abutting Local Landscaping Zone, instead of the Arterial Landscaping Zone. The following is a brief description and summary of the landscaped areas associated within each Arterial Landscaping Zones. A visual depiction of the location and extent of the improvement areas and Zone boundaries are provided in "Part VAssessment Diagrams" of this Report. Within some of the Arterial Landscaping Zones there are landscape improvement areas (various parkway landscaping and/or greenbelt areas) that are not included as part of the Arterial Landscaping Zone assessments and are currently funded by the City. These improvement areas are distinguished in the Assessment Diagrams by a different color and are summarized in the following descriptions.
Arterial Landscaping Zone A-1
The properties within this Arterial Landscaping Zone proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 114,610 square feet of designated landscape improvement area that incorporates an estimated 30,010 square feet of irrigated sloped/mostly-sloped landscaped area; 84,250 square feet of irrigated flat/moderatelysloped landscaped area; and 350 square feet of non-irrigated area and trails. The improvement areas for which properties in this Zone receive special benefit are generally located in the following area(s):
➢ La Palma Avenue from approximately 700 feet east of Weir Canyon Road (Yorba Linda Boulevard), east to Camino De Bryant.
Arterial Landscaping Zone A-2
The properties within this Arterial Landscaping Zone proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 293,500 square feet of designated landscape improvement area that incorporates an estimated 69,480 square feet of irrigated median landscaping and 3,500 square feet non-irrigated/hardscape median area; 149,840 square feet of irrigated sloped/mostly-sloped landscaped area; and 70,680 square feet of flat/moderately-sloped landscaped area of which 36,710 square feet is irrigated and 33,970 square feet of non-irrigated area and trails. Portions of the medians associated with this Zone are shared by properties in adjacent Zones (shared by Zone A-2 and A-3 as well as A-5) and the square footage presented above represents this Zone’s proportional allocation of the total square footage of those shared median improvements. The improvement areas for which properties in this Zone receive special benefit are generally located in the following area(s):
➢ Esperanza Road from approximately 370 feet east of Via Del Cazador (the boundary line between Zones A-3 and A-2), west to approximately 490 feet west of Hickory Drive (a point which is approximately 450 feet east of Paseo Del Prado and the boundary line between Zones A-9 and A-2);
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard from San Antonio Road (the boundary line between Zones A-9 and A-2), east and south to approximately 400 feet southeast of Via De La Escuela (the point at which the boundary line of Zone A-3 crosses Yorba Linda Boulevard), • The median improvements from San Antonio Road to approximately 450 feet northwest of Via Del Agua (approximately 500 feet southeast of Dorinda Road) are shared with Zone A-5; and
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
• The median improvements from approximately 450 feet northwest of Via Del Agua to approximately 400 feet southeast of Via De La Escuela are shared with Zone A-3; ➢ Yorba Ranch Road from Yorba Linda Boulevard, south to Esperanza Road.
Arterial Landscaping Zone A-3
The properties within this Arterial Landscaping Zone proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 294,820 square feet of designated landscape improvement area that incorporates an estimated 42,970 square feet of irrigated median landscaping and 12,130 square feet non-irrigated/hardscape median area; 123,690 square feet of irrigated sloped/mostly-sloped landscaped; and 116,030 square feet of flat/moderately-sloped landscaped area of which 88,790 square feet is irrigated and 27,240 square feet is trails. Portions of the medians associated with this Zone are shared by properties in an adjacent Zone (shared by Zone A-2) and the median square footage presented above represents this Zone’s proportional allocation of the total square footage of those shared medians.
The improvement areas for which properties in this Zone receive special benefit are generally located in the following area(s):
➢ Esperanza Road from approximately 370 feet east of Via Del Cazador (the boundary line between Zones A-2 and A-3), east to a point approximately 1,450 east of New River Road; ➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard from approximately 450 feet northwest of Via Del Agua (approximately 500 feet southeast of Dorinda Road and the boundary line between Zones A5 and A-3), south to Esperanza Road, • The median improvements from approximately 450 feet northwest of Via Del Agua to approximately 400 feet south of Via De La Escuela are shared with Zone A-2.
Arterial Landscaping Zone A-4
The properties within this Arterial Landscaping Zone proportionately share and receive benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 564,710 square feet of designated landscape improvement area that incorporates an estimated 85,660 square feet of irrigated median landscaping and 11,660 square feet non-irrigated/hardscape median area; 383,090 square feet of irrigated sloped/mostly-sloped landscaped area; and 84,300 square feet of flat/moderately-sloped landscaped area of which 79,220 square feet is irrigated and 5,080 square feet of trails. Portions of the medians associated with this Zone are shared by properties in adjacent Zones (shared by Zone A-4 and Zones A-7, A-8, and A-9) and the median square footage presented above represents this Zone’s proportional allocation of the total square footage of those shared medians. In addition to the above square feet of improvements associated with this Zone, there are landscape improvements maintained by the City in various locations within the Zone that are not included as part of the improvements for which properties are assessed through the Arterial Landscaping Zone or any Local Landscaping Zone currently. The maintenance of these non-arterial right-of-way improvement areas are funded by the City. The improvement areas for which properties in this Zone receive special benefit are generally located in the following area(s):
➢ Esperanza Road from Imperial Highway, east to Fairmont Boulevard; ➢ Imperial Highway from Yorba Linda Boulevard, south to Esperanza Road, • The median improvements from Yorba Linda Boulevard to Kellogg Drive are shared with Zone A-8;
Yorba Linda Street Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard from Imperial Highway, east to Avenida Rio Del Oro, (These median improvements are shared with Zone A-7);
➢ Fairmont Connector between Fairmont Boulevard and Esperanza Road, • The median island is situated between the roadway and the bike lane on the Fairmont Connector just north of Esperanza Road;
➢ Fairmont Boulevard from Yorba Linda Boulevard, south to Esperanza Road, • The median improvements from Paseo De Las Palomas, south to Esperanza Road are shared with Zone A-9;
➢ Non-Assessed Local Improvements in this Zone include, but are not limited to:
• Parkways located in the vicinity of Kellogg Drive and Arroyo Cajon Drive; Grandview Avenue and Sunny Slope; Avenida Rio Del Oro south of Yorba Linda Boulevard; the east side of Fairmont Boulevard just north of Paseo De Las Palomas; and the west side of Fairmont Boulevard between Paseo De Las Palomas and Village Center Drive; • Greenbelt/trail areas located generally along Kingsbriar Drive between Fairmont Boulevard and Acacia Hill Drive; and
• Median and parkway landscaping on Imperial Highway located southeast of Kellogg Drive.
Arterial Landscaping Zone A-5
The properties within this Arterial Landscaping Zone proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of approximately 648,630 square feet of designated landscape improvement area that incorporates an estimated 112,510 square feet of irrigated median landscaping and 11,630 square feet non-irrigated/hardscape median area; 384,230 square feet of irrigated sloped/mostly-sloped landscaped area; and 140,260 square feet of flat/moderately-sloped landscaped area of which 69,930 square feet is irrigated and 70,330 square feet is non-irrigated comprised of natural vegetation or minimal/modified/fallowlandscaped areas and/or trails. Portions of the medians associated with this Zone are shared by properties in adjacent Zones (shared by Zone A-5 and Zones A-2, A-7, and A-9) and the median square footage presented above represents this Zone’s proportional allocation of the total square footage of those shared medians. The improvement areas for which properties in this Zone receive special benefit are generally located in the following area(s):
➢ Bastanchury Road from the boundary line between Zones A-6 and A-5 which is approximately 310 feet east of Emerald Downs Drive and 1,000 feet west of Clydesdale, east to Village Center Drive,
• The median improvements from Fairmont Boulevard, east to approximately 830 feet west of Village Center Drive are shared with Zone A-7;
➢ Yorba Linda Boulevard from approximately 750 feet west of Village Center Drive (the boundary line between Zones A-7 and A-5), east to approximately 500 feet southeast of Dorinda Road (approximately 450 feet northwest of Via Del Agua and the boundary line between A-3 and A-5),
• The median improvements from approximately 750 feet west of Village Center Drive to San Antonio Road are shared with Zone A-9;