Agenda packet — Yorba Linda City Council, October 6, 2026 (part 2 of 2)

of construction, sprinklers, floor area, height, and allowable floor area. 113.Plans shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the nature and extent of the proposed work and to show in detail that the project will conform to the provisions of all applicable codes and of relevant laws, ordinances, and regulations. In addition to avoiding delays in the permitting process, clear and complete plans will also expedite the construction and inspection process.
114.Project Data shall include:
 Total square footage of each floor (with a breakdown of existing and proposed square footage); existing and proposed building(s) (excluding garage); garage; balconies, covered patios and accessory buildings (if applicable); and property;
 Provide ratio of lot coverage to lot area, and ratio of total floor area to lot area;
 Total square footage of landscaped area (does not include hardscape areas): and ratio of total landscaped area to lot area. 115.A survey is required to accurately determine the property lines and/or building location.
116.Deferred Submittals shall be clearly noted on the cover sheet, reviewed and approved by the design professional prior to being submitted to the city, and shall be submitted, approved and permitted prior to the framing inspection.
117.Plan check requirements may change if the project site is within the oil/gas (combustible soils hazard) and the property is on a septic system. 118. Details on the cover any special hazards conditions that apply such as, fire hazard severity zone, septic system, oil wells, etc. 119.Applicant shall contact the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board with any questions related to the septic system and connection to sewer.
120.Applicant shall submit a geotechnical report for the proposed structures.

Please have a geotechnical engineer provide an analysis with site boring locations, soils type, any liquefaction or contamination encounters, and the prescribed soils values to be used in the structural design of the proposed structures. Soils report shall coincide with all the requirements of Section 1803 of the 2025 California Building Code, Volume II.

Geotechnical report shall not be more than two years old, or provide

Page 250 of 344 ends

a current, signed and stamped update report. An update report shall be prepared for geotechnical reports older than two years from the date of publication (unless the geotechnical consultant specifies a shorter expiration date), or at the discretion of the Building Official.

Such reports may also be necessary when:
 The scope of the project changes.
 Site conditions change.
 The previous report is sufficiently old so as to be outdated with regard to industry standards of practice or building codes.  The original geotechnical professional included a statement in the report that an update would be needed after a certain amount of time.

Update reports shall: describe the currently proposed development; include a site reconnaissance, clearly state that site conditions have not changed from initial report; provide an up-to-date site plan or geotechnical/geologic map and reference prior reports. The update report shall state whether all recommendations of the prior report(s) are applicable, or provide revised recommendations, as appropriate.

Geotechnical/soils engineer to review and approve final foundation plan, foundation details, shoring plan, pool plan, precise grading and drainage plan and erosion plan.
121.Separate permits are required for grading, photovoltaic systems, fire sprinklers, as-built structures, retaining walls, swimming pools, demolition, detached accessory structures, outdoor cooking facilities/ BBQ‘s, etc. Clearly note this on the site plan.
122.Applicant shall satisfy all requirements of the Orange County Fire Authority prior to issuance of building permits and the final inspection.

Contact the Orange County Fire Authority at (714) 573-6100 for requirements. Fire Sprinkler installations requirements are part of this requirement.
123.Applicant shall satisfy all conditions of approval and any other department or agency requirements prior to the building permit’s final inspection.
124.Architectural, Structural and MEP sheets shall all be coordinated. All plan view sheets (i.e. floor plans, roof plans, framing plans, foundation plans, etc.) shall include gridlines to facilitate coordination. 125.Show the locations of the heating, cooling, and ventilating equipment. 126.Energy storage system (BESS) ready. All new single-family dwellings and new detached ADU’s shall meet the following. All electrical components shall be installed in accordance with the California Electrical

Page 251 of 344 ends

Code [CEnC (150.0)(s)]:

1. At least one of the following shall be provided:
 BESS ready interconnection equipment with a minimum
backed-up capacity of 60 amps and a minimum of four ESSsupplied branch circuits, or  A dedicated raceway from the main service to a panelboard (subpanel) that supplies the branch circuits in Section 150.0(s)(2). All branch circuits are permitted to be supplied by the main service panel prior to the installation of a BESS.

The trade size of the raceway shall be not less than 1 inch.  The panelboard that supplies the branch circuits (subpanel) must be labeled “Subpanel shall include all backed-up load circuits.

2. A minimum of four branch circuits shall be identified and have their source of supple collocated at a single panelboard suitable to be supplied by the BESS. At least one circuit shall supply the refrigerator, one lighting circuit shall be located near the primary egress and at least one circuit shall supply a sleeping room receptacle outlet.

3. The main panelboard shall have a minimum busbar rating of 225 amps.

4. Sufficient space shall be reserved to allow future installation of a system isolation equipment/transfer switch within 3 feet of the main panelboard. Raceways shall be installed between the panelboard and the system isolation.

5. Equipment/transfer switch location to allow the connection of backup power source.
127.Heat pump space heater ready. Systems using gas or propane furnace to serve new single-family dwellings and new detached ADU’s shall include the following [CEnC (150.0)(t)]:

1. A dedicated 240-volt branch circuit wiring shall be installed within 3 feet from the furnace and accessible to the furnace with no obstructions. The branch circuit conductors shall be rated at 30 amps minimum. The blank cover shall be identified as “240V ready.” All electrical components shall be installed in accordance with the California Electrical Code.

2. The main electrical service panel shall have a reserved space to allow for the installation of a double pole circuit breaker for a future heat pump space heater installation. The reserved space shall be permanently marked as “For Future 240V use.”

Page 252 of 344 ends

128.Electric cooktop ready. Systems using gas or propane cooktop to serve new single-family dwellings and new detached ADU’s shall include the following [CEnC (150.0)(u)]:

1. A dedicated 240-volt branch circuit wiring shall be installed within 3 feet from the cooktop and accessible to the cooktop with no obstructions. The branch circuit conductors shall be rated at 50 amps minimum. The blank cover shall be identified as “240V ready.” All electrical components shall be in accordance with the California Electric Code.

2. The main electrical service panel shall have a reserved space to allow for the installation of a double pole circuit breaker for a future electric cooktop installation. The reserved space shall be permanently marked as “For Future 240V use.”
129.Electric clothes dryer ready. Clothes dryer locations with gas or propane plumbing to serve new single-family dwellings and new detached ADU’s shall include the following [CEnC (150.0)(v)]:

1. A dedicated 240 volt branch circuit wiring shall be installed within 3 feet from the clothes dryer location and accessible to the clothes dryer location with no obstructions. The branch circuit conductors shall be rated at 30 amps minimum. The blank cover shall be identified as “240V ready.” All electrical components shall be installed in accordance with the California Electrical Code.

2. The main electrical service panel shall have a reserved space to allow for the installation of a double pole circuit breaker for a future electric clothes dryer installation. The reserved space shall be permanently marked as “For future 240V use.”
130.Dwelling units in two-family dwellings (attached ADUs, Duplexes) shall be separated from each other by wall and floor assemblies having not less than a 1-hour fire-resistance rating (CRC302.3).
131.All structures shall be designed in in accordance with Section 1609 for the wind design and Section 1613 seismic design of the 2025 California Building Code. The design shall be site specific and include the necessary data to justify proposed design. The wind loading in Yorba Linda is 110 mph, using Basic Wind Speed and Exposure C. 132.All new roofs shall be CLASS A fire rated roofing materials. . In addition, all roofing material must be installed to meet high wind velocity (110 mph), per table 1609.3.1, Basic Wind Speed, of the 2025 California Building Code and exposure "C" standards.

Page 253 of 344 ends

133.Applicant shall satisfy all requirements of the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) prior to issuance of building permits and final inspection. Contact Orange County Fire Authority at (714) 573-6100 for requirements. Fire Sprinkler installations requirements are part of this requirement.
134.New Group R Buildings: An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout all new buildings.
135.Aging-In-Place Design and Fall Prevention: New dwellings shall demonstrate compliance on plans with the following:
 At least one bathroom on the entry level shall provide reinforcement for grab bars.
 Electrical receptacle outlets, switches, and controls intended to be used by occupants shall be located no more than 48-in. measured from the top of the outlet box and not less than 15-in. measured from the bottom of the outlet box above the finish floor.  At least one bathroom and one bedroom on the entry level shall provide a doorway with a net clear opening of not less than 32-in.  Where installed, at least one doorbell button shall not exceed 48- in above exterior floor or landing.
136.Fire Sprinklers: When fire sprinklers are installed, or modified, please contact the Yorba Linda Water District (YLWD) to ensure the correct backflow prevention device is noted on the plans and approved by the district. The City shall require a signed and dated letter from YLWD that is emailed to the City summarizing their requirements and approval for permit issuance.
137.All construction sites greater than 1 acre shall comply with the current City of Yorba Linda Erosion Control and Pollution Prevention requirements. The current requirements can be requested by contacting the Building Department at:

City of Yorba Linda - Building Department at 714-961-7120 Planning
138.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a copy of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R’s) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners’ Association shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney and Community Development Director prior to recordation. Copies of the final CC&R’s and the final map shall be placed on file with the Community Development Director.

Page 254 of 344 ends

139.All existing structures on site shall be demolished prior to the recordation of the tract map, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Building Official.
140.Pad elevations on the final grading plan cannot deviate more than ± one foot (± 1’) from the grades shown on the Tentative Map as approved by the Planning Commission. Any grade changes greater than the ± 1- foot shall necessitate the grading plan being submitted for the review and approval of the Community Development Director to determine consistency with the Tentative tract map approval prior to the issuance of the grading permit.
141.Street names, if applicable, shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to recordation of the final tract map.

Suggested street names and alternatives shall be submitted in writing to the Community Development Director for approval. Phonic similarity with existing street names should be avoided.
142.Air conditioner condenser pads shall be shown on the plot plan, and shall maintain Zoning Code separation requirements from an adjacent dwelling.
143.All roof appurtenances and mechanical equipment, including but not limited to HVAC units, shall be screened from public view and sound buffered from adjacent properties to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and Building Official.
144.No equipment shall be located on the sloped, externally visible portion of the roof of the structure.
145.Parking area/Street lighting shall consist of downward directed “shoebox” style fixtures, a maximum of 20 feet in height. Lighting shall be directed away from all property lines, adjacent streets and residences and shown in detail on the site and landscape plans. On-site illumination intensity shall not exceed 0.2 footcandles at any neighboring property line. Location, fixture design and shielding details shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to installation.
146.Decorative masonry walls and/or fencing shall be installed along the tract perimeter. Publicly viewed perimeter walls will be required to include vine plantings to break up the masses of masonry walls. Exact location and design shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit.
147.All tubular steel fencing within Vesting Tentative Tract Map 19472

Page 255 of 344 ends

shall be designed to prevent rust and provide the greatest degree of longevity and durability feasible to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.
148.Final species, location, size, and planting details of all project site trees shall be approved by the City Landscape Architect.
149.All common landscape along the easterly project boundaries shall be constantly maintained in a healthy, thriving condition by the homeowner’s association for the project as to adequately screen and protect the privacy of the adjacent homeowners located on the Main Street.
150.The Applicant shall provide landscape architecture plans prepared by a California-licensed landscape architect including where applicable:
a. Landscape development of all street median islands;
b. Proposed and required fencing or walls;
c. Permanent irrigation system;
d. Landscape planting and irrigation shall occur on all slopes in excess of seven feet (7’) high and 5:1 or steeper;
e. Natural areas where the Orange County Fire Authority recommends a fuel modification program;
f. Open space lots;
g. Screening around oil wells;
h. Ground mounted lighting fixtures;
i. Facilities for the handicapped including ramps, logos and signs; j. Existing trees;
k. Parking lot details including wheel stops, sidewalk details, signing and striping;
l. Drainage details;
m. Electrical transformers;
n. Trash enclosures;
o. Details of public recreational/equestrian trails;
p. Details of private trails;
q. Areas to be maintained by Landscape Maintenance Assessment District, homeowner’s association, and private property owners; r. Model home/sales complex;
s. Ground-mounted mechanical equipment;
t. Oil wells (active or abandoned);
u. Playground equipment details conforming to the Consumer Products Safety Commission.
151.Final Landscape architecture plans, subject to all applicable plan check fees, shall be submitted to the Engineering and Planning Divisions, as applicable, for review and approval by the City Landscape Architect per

Page 256 of 344 ends

the standard plan check process prior to installation of exterior hardscape, landscape planting, and/or irrigation. All landscape architecture shall be installed prior to final occupancy and release of permits for each phase of the project.
152.The developer shall have the following items on permanent and prominent display in the sales office where applicable:
a. A copy of the approved and recorded tract map;
b. A copy of the approved Design Review plot plans;
c. A copy of the approved landscape architecture plans; d. A copy of the approved residential parking plan;
e. A current Yorba Linda General Plan land use map;
f. A current Yorba Linda Zoning Map;
g. A noise display board including the site plan and noise study h. A map showing private and public equestrian trails;
i. A map showing the boundaries of those area to be maintained by the Landscape Maintenance Assessment District;
j. A statement regarding estimated partial first tax year and full second year tax levies attributable to special bond issue taxes levied by the Yorba Linda Water District;
k. A statement regarding estimated partial first tax year and full second year tax levies attributable to the Landscape Maintenance Assessment District;
l. Fuel modification program maps;
m. Seismic fault zone information and map describing known fault data;
n. A statement regarding special fire protection areas due to wildland exposure;
o. Applicable Codes, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R’s); p. Copies (blank) of statements or other disclosures required to be endorsed by the purchaser of a lot or home within tract as required by the City of Yorba Linda;
q. A statement regarding limitation of vehicular access rights due to dedications to the City;
r. A statement regarding the requirement to construct landscape planting and irrigation and permanently maintain landscape development in the required front yard setback area; and, s. A statement regarding current Zoning Ordinance limitations on parking of vehicles in front yard area;
t. A statement advising homeowners to contact the Yorba Linda Community Development Department prior to any additional on-site construction, i.e., pools, patios, fences, retaining walls, storage or utility structures, air conditioning or solar installations, etc. u. A map of all existing and abandoned oil wells on and within 500 feet of the project site; and,

Page 257 of 344 ends

153.If applicable, the developer is required to provide to the Planning Division upon sale and transfer the following signed statement by the purchasers of properties located within a Landscape Maintenance Assessment District:
“In purchasing property described as [insert lot and tract number], on [insert date], I/we understand that said lot is located within the boundaries of a Landscape Maintenance Assessment District and that an annual landscape
maintenance charge will be levied.

Signed: [Purchaser]
Name:”
154.If applicable, the developer
“In purchasing property described as [insert lot and tract number], on [insert date], I/we understand that said lot contains or is located within 50 feet of an abandoned oil well and that no permanent wall or structure may be constructed within a 10-foot radius of the extended shaft line of said well.

Signed: [Purchaser]
Name:”
155.The developer shall confirm compliance with disclosure-related conditions of approval in writing to the Community Development Director prior to opening of the sales office.
156.Developer is encouraged to offer hot water recirculating system in all new residential subdivisions as an option to any buyer purchasing a home prior to construction.
157.Mailbox shall be designed, installed and located by the developer to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
158.The cover sheet of the building construction drawings shall include a blue line print of the City’s conditions of approval and shall be attached to each set of plans submitted for City approval.
159.Pre-cast fireplaces shall not be allowed on exterior walls. 160.Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all other applicable City ordinances and development standards in effect at this time.

Page 258 of 344 ends

161.Any approved technical drawings and/or specifications that will be changed, altered, or in any other way affected as a result of the Planning Commission approval of this project shall be revised and resubmitted for review and approval by the applicable City department.
162.The Applicant shall agree and consent in writing within 60 days to the conditions of approval as adopted by the Planning Commission. 163.Development shall occur substantially as shown on the plans approved by the Planning Commission and on file in the Community Development Department.
164.The approval of Tentative Tract Map 19472 is granted for two (2) years from the date of approval by the Planning Commission, and shall become null and void upon expiration of said two year period, unless building permits have been issued or a time extension is requested in writing prior to that date.

Special Conditions:
165.Tentative Tract Map 19472 is for a 30-unit residential development with associated parking spaces, perimeter walls and gates, and landscaping improvements. Any modifications to the Tentative Map and/or proposed on-site improvements shall require subsequent approval of a revised Tentative Map as determined by the Community Development Director. 166.Approval of Tentative Tract Map 19472 is contingent upon concurrent approval of Design Review 2026-02. Failure to approve Design Review 2026-02 shall render any approval of Tentative Tract Map 19472 null and void.
167.The Applicant shall provide 2 units (approximately 6.7% of the 30-unit project) for sale to “very low income households” as defined by Health and Safety Code section 50105 (referred to as the “Affordable Units”).

The Affordable Units shall be subject to the affordable housing cost, purchaser qualification, equity-sharing, and other applicable requirements of Government Code section 65915(c)(2), Health and Safety Code section 50052.5, and Chapter 18.19 of the Yorba Linda Municipal Code. In furtherance of this commitment, the Applicant shall enter into with the City and record against the project site an “Affordable Housing and Density Bonus Agreement” prepared by the City Attorney’s office that, among other terms, identifies and designates the two (2) Affordable Units, requires that the Affordable Units be sold to very-low income households, and requires that in connection with such sales, the very low income household purchasers enter into an equity sharing agreement and associated documents with the City. Prior to the issuance of any grading and/or building permits: (i) the Applicant

Page 259 of 344 ends

shall have obtained from the City Council the approval of the Affordable Housing and Density Bonus Agreement, and (ii) the Applicant shall have recorded the Affordable Housing and Density Bonus Agreement in the Official Records of Orange County, California.
168.The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Yorba Linda, its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul an approval of the subject application by the City, its legislative body, advisory agencies or administrative officers.

The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding against the City and the Applicant will either undertake defense of the matter and pay the City's associated legal costs or will advance funds to pay for defense of the matter by the City Attorney. 169.The developer accepts the approval of Tentative Tract Map 19472 with the understanding that the City of Yorba Linda is opposed to the landbased financing of any and all public facilities or development fees required by the City or any other public agency. The developer therefore agrees that it shall not pursue with the City or any other public agency the creation of a community facilities district or any other land based financing for public facilities or development fees in connection with this project. The developer represents that it will inform any successor developer of developer’s understanding of the City’s prohibition and developer’s agreement not to pursue such public financing. As with all the conditions of approval contained herein, this condition shall apply to developer and its successors and assigns.
170.The private street entry/exit shall be constructed of decorative stamped concrete or decorative pavers as represented within the landscape plan, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 171.Gate access to the proposed project shall be permitted subject to final review and approval of the gate design, location, operation, emergency access, vehicle queuing, and associated circulation improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and Orange County Fire Authority. The final gate design and operation shall substantially conform to the approved project plans and shall not impede emergency access or create unsafe traffic or circulation conditions on Plumosa Drive or Lemon Drive.
172.As an in-fill development site, construction will be occurring within a noisesensitive environment. In accordance with Municipal Code requirements, any construction or maintenance activity on real property which may disturb the peace and comfort of the inhabitants of the neighborhood or comfortable enjoyment of life and property is prohibited between the

Page 260 of 344 ends

hours of 8:00 PM and 7:00 AM on weekdays and Saturday, or any time on Sunday or a federal holiday, unless said work is of an emergency nature or a prior permit has been obtained from the Community Development Director. Applicant shall rigorously adhere to this Municipal Code requirement during the construction phases of the project to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
173.Prior to issuance of any demolition permit, as a means of ensuring that construction related impacts to surrounding neighboring residential uses is minimized to the greatest extent feasible, the Applicant shall prepare a Construction Management Plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director. Plan shall include, but not limited to, provisions for mitigating noise and dust impacts to neighboring properties during construction, coordination of common boundary work, securing of pools and pets, and emergency contact.
174.Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading, or building permit, whichever occur first, the Applicant shall submit a construction staging plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director and City Engineer. The plan shall identify, at a minimum, proposed construction staging areas, worker parking, material and equipment storage areas, delivery and loading areas, and construction access routes. All construction activities shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the approved staging plan.
175.Appropriate size of evergreen trees shall be provided within the landscape area along the perimeter of the project site, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and City Landscape Architect.

The landscape buffer area shall be shown on the final map and within the CC&R’s to be recorded with the map.
176.Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall provide to the Planning Division, an electronic copy of the final plans approved by the Planning Commission. The copy shall be provided on a USB thumb drive in “.pdf” format.
177.Construction and architectural detailing shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plans, including but not necessarily limited to elevation drawings and material/colors sample board, submitted as a part of this application and as approved by the Planning Commission, except that any modification shall be subject to the discretion of the Community Development Director upon finding that any changes are comparable in substance and quality to the original approval.
178.Any future modification to the building colors approved by the Planning

Page 261 of 344 ends

Commission shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. At the Community Development Director’s discretion, proposed color modifications may be referred to the Planning Commission for design review approval.
179.Applicant shall include notification within the CC&R’s as well as within the project sales office informing potential homeowners that landscaping within Homeowners Association maintained areas is not to be modified, trimmed, or removed in any way by the homeowner, without written authorization by the Homeowners Association.
180.Maximum building height is dictated by Section 18.26.030 of the Yorba Linda Zoning Code which allows decorative architectural elements such as chimneys, cupolas, weathervanes, and screened mechanical units to extend up to 10 percent above the maximum building height with final discretion to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director approval.
181.The final site plan for Tentative Tract Map 19472 shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits.
182.The project Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall prohibit the use of dedicated covered resident parking spaces for personal storage or any use other than for the parking of operable motor vehicles at all times to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and Community Development Director. The CC&Rs shall include language to authorize the Homeowner Association to conduct garage checks to ensure compliance.
183.All standard conditions, design features, and mitigation measures described within the Tentative Tract Map 19472 and the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Yorba Linda 2021-2029 Housing Element and Implementation Programs are incorporated herein by reference and shall apply to Tentative Tract Map 19472 to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
184.Prior to issuance of grading and building permits for the residential development, the Applicant shall provide to the Planning Division an executed Tribal Monitoring Agreement for the presence of a qualified tribal monitor during ground-disturbing activities associated with the project.

Additionally, the Applicant shall adhere to Mitigation Measures as described and submitted by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation.
185.Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall pay Quimby

Page 262 of 344 ends

and/or park in-lieu fees for the development of 30 units to the City of Yorba Linda Parks and Recreation Department at the designated multifamily rate. The amount of the in-lieu fees shall be determined in compliance with City Ordinance No. 2015-5308 (or more recent ordinance update) and subject to the approval of the Director of the Parks and Recreations Department. Any impact fees credits associated with the existing 1912 single-family residence shall be applied pursuant to City policy and applicable State laws.
186.The applicant is responsible for City costs and fees, including legal fees, pertaining to entitlement of project, drafting and review of required legal documents including Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs), affordable housing and other agreements.
- The End -

Page 263 of 344 ends

Asbestos & Lead Inspection Report
Site:
4742 Plumosa Dr
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Prepared for:

The Olson Company
3010 Old Ranch Pkwy, Suite 100
Seal Beach, CA 90740
Date:

August 31st, 2026

Page 264 of 344 ends

1 | Page
Cardinal Environmental Consultants Inc.
2681 Dow Avenue Suite C-1
Tustin, California 92780
Phone: (714) 730-5931
Fax: (714) 730-1697
[email protected]
Date: August 31st, 2026

Owner/Client: The Olson Company
3010 Old Ranch Pkwy, Suite 100
Seal Beach, CA 90740
Site Address: 4742 Plumosa Dr
Yorba Linda, CA 92886

Subject: Asbestos Inspection Report
To whom it may concern:

Cardinal Environmental Consultants Inc. conducted an asbestos inspection at 4742 Plumosa Dr.

The inspection was requested due to upcoming renovations. This report includes inspection and sample testing of all suspect building materials.

All suspect materials to be impacted by the project were sampled in accordance with the regulations. Sampling methodology, laboratory report, and recommendations can be found on subsequent pages of this report.

Regulatory Compliance:

On August 24th, 2026, Cardinal Environmental Consultants Inc conducted an asbestos survey at 4742 Plumosa Dr. The survey was completed in compliance with the federal AHERA (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act) 40 CFR Part 763 subpart E. The Act indicates procedures for sampling and reporting of asbestos information (about the school) to students, staff, and contractors working on schools where students K through 12 are present. Ronald R McDaniel (CAC 01-2865) conducted this inspection.

Adherence to NESHAP (National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants) has been achieved with compliance to South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Rule 1403.

SCAQMD is the local air quality district that regulates and monitors asbestos abatement activity in the region of the buildings.

Page 265 of 344 ends

2 | Page
Sampling Methodology – Asbestos:

Cardinal Environmental Consultants Inc. used several procedures from visual assessments to tangible assessments and a modified random sampling protocol to collect the samples of the suspect asbestos containing material. Cardinal’s sampling procedures incorporate the use of plastic Ziploc bags, labeled with black permanent markers per a unique numbering sequence.

One label with the suspect samples collected for this report was given a unique sample identification number. A second description was placed on the bulk sample log. Information about the sample, including the sample type and location was noted on the sheet as each sample was collected.

Asbestos: Any building material which contains asbestos in an amount greater than 1% by weight, area.
<1% Asbestos: Federal regulations and SCAQMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District) do not regulate asbestos at this percentage. Notifications to these agencies do not apply.

However, OSHA regulations do apply. These are specific to “worker protection” issues. A contractor who is “DOSH certified” is required if removing more than 100 square feet. Federal and State regulations do not regulate the disposal of this type of construction debris with this level of asbestos. However, your local landfill may have a “zero tolerance” for any asbestos containing debris.

Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials:

Samples of suspect Asbestos-containing materials were taken of the interior and exterior throughout the structure. We were able to collect representative samples of all scope required building materials.

The following materials were tested:
• Linoleum
• Drywall
• Joint Compound
• Pipe Insulation
• Acoustic Ceiling
• Concrete
• Plasterboard
• Asphalt
• Flat Roof Material
• Shingle Roofing
• Roof Penetration Mastic
Results:

All samples were packaged and shipped to EmLab P&K, LLC (NVLAP 200757-0) 2841 Dow Avenue, Suite 300, Tustin, CA 92780 (866) 465-6653. The analysis procedure used to determine the presence of asbestos is outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations 40 CFR part 763, Section 1, Appendix A, Polarized Light Microscopy.

The following tables depict asbestos at the school. The investigator has reviewed the results and construction of the buildings and adjusted the locations and the quantities based on

Page 266 of 344 ends

3 | Page
“homogeneous areas.” AHERA can require the like areas in type, construction, and use (that test positive for asbestos) be combined with other similar areas. Therefore, some areas may not be specifically tested for asbestos but be included in an area of asbestos. Likewise, an area that has tested negative for asbestos could be included in the asbestos table because of the definition of “homogeneous area.”
Subsequent tables in this document depict what was sampled and the outcome of each. Those subsequent tables should be used for clarification and not for quantification of asbestos.

Asbestos:

Material Location Condition Quantity
Pipe Insulation/Duct
Wrap
Basement Good Approx 150sf
Roof Penetration
Mastic
House Roof Good Approx: 50sf
Transite Pipe Basement, Piping Good Approx: 20sf
Summary:

Pipe Insulation:

The pipe insulation/duct wrap is in the basement area.

Transite Pipe:

Transite pipe is in the basement area.

Penetration Mastic:

The penetration mastic is located at multiple penetration sites on the roof area.

Cardinal Environmental aggressively searched all areas and located asbestos containing materials in various areas. Every suspected material was sampled and sent to the laboratory. All asbestos must be removed by a DOSH licensed abatement contractor.

Sincerely yours,
CARDINAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC.,
A California Corporation
By:

Ronald R. McDaniel
California Certified Asbestos Consultant #01-2865 (expiration 3/9/27) CDPH Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor and Project Monitor/Designer #3599 Certified Microbial Consultant by American Indoor Air Quality Council

Page 267 of 344 ends

Diagram(s)

Page 268 of 344 ends

Garage 3
PHS-47 PHS-41
Storage Storage
Room 1 Garage 1 Room 2 Garage 2 Tool Room
PHS-48 PHS-44
PHS-19 PHS-28 PHS-42 PHS-45
PHS-22 PHS-46
PHS-25 PHS-27
PHS-18
PHS-21 PHS-30
PHS-23 PHS-24 PHS-26 PHS-49
PHS-17 PHS-20 PHS-29 PHS-31
PHS-43
Outside Garage
Area
Loundry Bedroom 1 Bathroom Main Bathroom
Area
PHS-15
Main Bedroom
PHS-16 Office
PHS-32 Area
PHS-36 PSH-37
PHS-02
PHS-01 PHS-03
PHS-09 PHS-33 PHS-35 PHS-39
Basement PHS-40
Legend
PHS-04 Hallway
PHS-05 Attic
PHS-06 Basement
PHS-34 Attic
PHS-08 PHS-10
PHS-11 PHS-38
PHS-07 PHS-12
Kitchen Additional
Closet Living Room
Dinning Area living Room
PHS-13
Bedroom 2
PHS-14
8/24/2026
4742 Plumosa Dr Asbestos Survey
Date of Inspection Project Name: 4742 Plumosa Dr Asbestos Survey 4742 Plumosa Dr, Yorba Linda, CA 92886
The Olson Company

Page 269 of 344 ends

Sampling Table

Page 270 of 344 ends

Asbestos Sampling Data Cardinal Environmental Consultants Inc.

Date: August 31st, 2026 Technician: Ronald McDaniel
Client: The Olson Company
Location: 4742 Plumosa Dr
Building # Material Sample # Results Condition F/NF Sample Location 4742 Plumosa Dr Linoleum PHS-01 ND Good NF Laundry Area, Under Wood Flooring 4742 Plumosa Dr Linoleum PHS-02 ND Good NF Laundry Area, Under Wood Flooring 4742 Plumosa Dr Linoleum PHS-03 ND Good NF Laundry Area, Under Wood Flooring 4742 Plumosa Dr Drywall PHS-04 ND Good NF Basement, Walls 4742 Plumosa Dr Drywall PHS-05 ND Good NF Basement, Walls 4742 Plumosa Dr Drywall PHS-06 ND Good NF Basement, Walls 4742 Plumosa Dr Joint Compound PHS-07 ND Good NF Basement, Walls 4742 Plumosa Dr Joint Compound PHS-08 ND Good NF Basement, Walls 4742 Plumosa Dr Joint Compound PHS-09 ND Good NF Basement, Walls 4742 Plumosa Dr Pipe Insulation PHS-10 20% Chrysotile Good F Basement, Piping 4742 Plumosa Dr Pipe Insulation PHS-11 20% Chrysotile Good F Basement, Piping 4742 Plumosa Dr Pipe Insulation PHS-12 20% Chrysotile Good F Basement, Piping 4742 Plumosa Dr Acoustic Ceiling PHS-13 ND Good NF Dining Room, Ceiling 4742 Plumosa Dr Acoustic Ceiling PHS-14 ND Good NF Living Room, Ceiling 4742 Plumosa Dr Acoustic Ceiling PHS-15 ND Good NF Bedrooms, Ceiling 4742 Plumosa Dr Acoustic Ceiling PHS-16 ND Good NF Bedrooms, Ceiling 4742 Plumosa Dr Concrete PHS-17 ND Good NF Garage 1, Storage Room 1 4742 Plumosa Dr Concrete PHS-18 ND Good NF Garage 1, Storage Room 1 4742 Plumosa Dr Concrete PHS-19 ND Good NF Garage 1, Storage Room 1 4742 Plumosa Dr Plasterboard PHS-20 ND Good NF Garage 1, Storage Room 1 4742 Plumosa Dr Plasterboard PHS-21 ND Good NF Garage 1, Storage Room 1 4742 Plumosa Dr Plasterboard PHS-22 ND Good NF Garage 1, Storage Room 1 4742 Plumosa Dr Asphalt PHS-23 ND Good NF Gargae 1
4742 Plumosa Dr Asphalt PHS-24 ND Good NF Gargae 1
4742 Plumosa Dr Asphalt PHS-25 ND Good NF Gargae 1
4742 Plumosa Dr Linoleum PHS-26 ND Good NF Garage 1, Storage Room 2 Analysis
Type:

Polarized Light Microscopy
Code of Federal Regulations 40
ND- No Asbestos Detected
NF- Non-Friable
F- Friable Page 271 of 344 Page 1
Asbestos Sampling Data Cardinal Environmental Consultants Inc.

Date: August 31st, 2026 Technician: Ronald McDaniel
Client: The Olson Company
Location: 4742 Plumosa Dr
Building # Material Sample # Results Condition F/NF Sample Location Analysis
Type:

Polarized Light Microscopy
Code of Federal Regulations 40
4742 Plumosa Dr Linoleum PHS-27 ND Good NF Garage 1, Storage Room 2 4742 Plumosa Dr Linoleum PHS-28 ND Good NF Garage 1, Storage Room 2 4742 Plumosa Dr Concrete PHS-29 ND Good NF Tool Room
4742 Plumosa Dr Concrete PHS-30 ND Good NF Tool Room
4742 Plumosa Dr Concrete PHS-31 ND Good NF Tool Room
4742 Plumosa Dr Flat Roof Material PHS-32 ND Good NF House Roof, Flat Area 4742 Plumosa Dr Flat Roof Material PHS-33 ND Good NF House Roof, Flat Area 4742 Plumosa Dr Flat Roof Material PHS-34 ND Good NF House Roof, Flat Area 4742 Plumosa Dr Shingle Roofing PHS-35 ND Good NF House Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Shingle Roofing PHS-36 ND Good NF House Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Shingle Roofing PHS-37 ND Good NF House Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Roof Penetration Mastic PHS-38 3% Chrysotile Good NF House Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Roof Penetration Mastic PHS-39 3% Chrysotile Good NF House Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Roof Penetration Mastic PHS-40 3% Chrysotile Good NF House Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Flat Roof Material PHS-41 ND Good NF Tool Room Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Flat Roof Material PHS-42 ND Good NF Tool Room Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Flat Roof Material PHS-43 ND Good NF Tool Room Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Roof Penetration Mastic PHS-44 ND Good NF Tool Room Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Roof Penetration Mastic PHS-45 ND Good NF Tool Room Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Roof Penetration Mastic PHS-46 ND Good NF Tool Room Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Shingle Roofing PHS-47 ND Good NF Double Garage Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Shingle Roofing PHS-48 ND Good NF Double Garage Roof 4742 Plumosa Dr Shingle Roofing PHS-49 ND Good NF Double Garage Roof ND- No Asbestos Detected
NF- Non-Friable
F- Friable Page 272 of 344 Page 2
Lab Results

Page 273 of 344 ends

Approved by:

Approved Signatory
Philip Newton
Report for:

Ron McDaniel
Cardinal Environmental
2681 Dow Avenue Ste. C1
Tustin, CA 92780
Regarding:

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
Project: 4742 Plumosa Dr Asbestos Survey; 4742 Plumosa Dr EML ID: 4679564
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the samples as received and tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data for sample results with >1% asbestos concentration can be provided when requested.

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC ("the Company"), a member of the Eurofins Built Environment Testing group of companies, shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Asbestos PLM: 08-25-2026
Service SOPs: Asbestos PLM (EPA 40CFR App E to Sub E of Part 763 & EPA 600/R-93-116, EBET-PLM-SOP83921) NVLAP Lab Code 200757-0
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 1 of 17

Page 274 of 344 ends

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
2841 Dow Avenue, Suite 300, Tustin, CA 92780
Client: Cardinal Environmental (833) 465-5857 www.eurofinsus.com/Built C/O: Ron McDaniel
Re: 4742 Plumosa Dr Asbestos Survey; 4742
Plumosa Dr
Date of Sampling: 08-20-2026
Date of Receipt: 08-21-2026
Date of Report: 08-25-2026

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT
Total Samples Submitted: 49
Total Samples Analyzed: 49
Total Samples with Layer Asbestos Content > 1%: 5
Location: PHS-01, Laundry Area, Under Wood Flooring - Linoleum Lab ID-Version‡: 23639633-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Tan Linoleum ND
Yellow Mastic ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-02, Laundry Area, Under Wood Flooring - Linoleum Lab ID-Version‡: 23639634-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Tan Linoleum ND
Yellow Mastic ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-03, Laundry Area, Under Wood Flooring - Linoleum Lab ID-Version‡: 23639635-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Tan Linoleum ND
Yellow Mastic ND
White Leveling Compound ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-04, Basement, Walls - Drywall Lab ID-Version‡: 23639636-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Drywall with Brown Paper ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 10% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 2 of 17 The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

All components not quantified as asbestos content and non-asbestos content are considered to be non-fibrous matrix components. Matrix components may include, but are not limited to, gypsum, paint, silicate minerals, vinyl, binder, calcium carbonate, tar, and foam.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Page 275 of 344 ends

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT
Location: PHS-05, Basement, Walls - Drywall Lab ID-Version‡: 23639637-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Drywall with Brown Paper ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 10% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-06, Basement, Walls - Drywall Lab ID-Version‡: 23639638-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Drywall with Brown Paper ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 10% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-07, Basement, Walls - Joint Compound Lab ID-Version‡: 23639639-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Joint Compound ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-08, Basement, Walls - Joint Compound Lab ID-Version‡: 23639640-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Joint Compound ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-09, Basement, Walls - Joint Compound Lab ID-Version‡: 23639641-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Joint Compound ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 3 of 17 The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Page 276 of 344 ends

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT
Location: PHS-10, Basement Piping - Pipe Insulation Lab ID-Version‡: 23639642-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Pipe Insulation 20% Chrysotile
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 40% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-11, Basement Piping - Pipe Insulation Lab ID-Version‡: 23639643-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Pipe Insulation 20% Chrysotile
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 40% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-12, Basement Piping - Pipe Insulation Lab ID-Version‡: 23639644-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Pipe Insulation 20% Chrysotile
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 40% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-13, Dining Room, Ceiling - Acoustic Ceiling Lab ID-Version‡: 23639645-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Acoustic Ceiling Material ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-14, Living Room, Ceiling -Acoustic Ceiling Lab ID-Version‡: 23639646-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Acoustic Ceiling Material ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 4 of 17 The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Page 277 of 344 ends

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT
Location: PHS-15, Bedroom - Acoustic Ceiling Lab ID-Version‡: 23639647-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Acoustic Ceiling Material ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-16, Bedrooms - Acoustic Ceiling Lab ID-Version‡: 23639648-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Beige Acoustic Ceiling Material ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-17, Garage 1, Storage Room 1 - Concrete Lab ID-Version‡: 23639649-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Concrete ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-18, Garage 1, Storage Room 1 - Concrete Lab ID-Version‡: 23639650-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Concrete ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-19, Garage 1, Storage Room 1 - Concrete Lab ID-Version‡: 23639651-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Concrete ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 5 of 17 The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Page 278 of 344 ends

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT
Location: PHS-20, Garage 1, Storage Room 1 - Plasterboard Lab ID-Version‡: 23639652-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Semi-Fibrous Material Plasteboard ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-21, Garage 1, Storage Room 1 - Plasterboard Lab ID-Version‡: 23639653-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Semi-Fibrous Material Plasteboard ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-22, Garage 1, Storage Room 1 - Plasterboard Lab ID-Version‡: 23639654-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
White Semi-Fibrous Material Plasteboard ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate
Location: PHS-23, Gargae 1 - Asphalt Lab ID-Version‡: 23639655-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Asphalt ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-24, Gargae 1 - Asphalt Lab ID-Version‡: 23639656-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Asphalt ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 6 of 17 The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Page 279 of 344 ends

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT
Location: PHS-25, Gargae 1 - Asphalt Lab ID-Version‡: 23639657-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Asphalt ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-26, Garage 1, Storage Room 2 - Linoleum Lab ID-Version‡: 23639658-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Tan Linoleum ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-27, Garage 1, Storage Room 2 - Linoleum Lab ID-Version‡: 23639659-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Tan Linoleum ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-28, Garage 1, Storage Room 2 - Linoleum Lab ID-Version‡: 23639660-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Tan Linoleum ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-29, Tool Room - Concrete Lab ID-Version‡: 23639661-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Concrete ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 7 of 17 The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Page 280 of 344 ends

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT
Location: PHS-30, Tool Room - Concrete Lab ID-Version‡: 23639662-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Concrete ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-31, Tool Room - Concrete Lab ID-Version‡: 23639663-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Gray Concrete ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-32, House Roof, Flat Area - Flat Roof Material Lab ID-Version‡: 23639664-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Shingle ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
5% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-33, House Roof, Flat Area - Flat Roof Material Lab ID-Version‡: 23639665-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Shingle ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
5% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 8 of 17 The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Page 281 of 344 ends

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT
Location: PHS-34, House Roof, Flat Area - Flat Roof Material Lab ID-Version‡: 23639666-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Shingle ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
5% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-35, House Roof - Shingle Roofing Lab ID-Version‡: 23639667-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Shingle 1 ND
Black Roofing Shingle 2 ND
Black Roofing Shingle 3 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
5% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-36, House Roof - Shingle Roofing Lab ID-Version‡: 23639668-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Shingle 1 ND
Black Roofing Shingle 2 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
5% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 9 of 17 The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Page 282 of 344 ends

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT
Location: PHS-37, House Roof - Shingle Roofing Lab ID-Version‡: 23639669-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Shingle 1 ND
Black Roofing Shingle 2 ND
Black Roofing Shingle 3 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
5% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-38, House Roof - Roof Penetration Mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 23639670-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Mastic 3% Chrysotile
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-39, House Roof - Roof Penetration Mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 23639671-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Mastic 3% Chrysotile
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-40, House Roof - Roof Penetration Mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 23639672-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Mastic ND
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 10 of 17 The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Page 283 of 344 ends

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT
Location: PHS-41, Tool Room Roof - Flat Roof Material Lab ID-Version‡: 23639673-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Shingle ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 1 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 2 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 3 ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-42, Tool Room Roof - Flat Roof Material Lab ID-Version‡: 23639674-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Shingle ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 1 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 2 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 3 ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-43, Tool Room Roof - Flat Roof Material Lab ID-Version‡: 23639675-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Shingle ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 1 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 2 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 3 ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-44, Double Garage Roof - Roof Penetration Mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 23639676-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Mastic ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 5% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 11 of 17 The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Page 284 of 344 ends

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT
Location: PHS-45, Double Garage Roof - Roof Penetration Mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 23639677-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Mastic ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 5% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-46, Double Garage Roof - Roof Penetration Mastic Lab ID-Version‡: 23639678-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Mastic ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 5% Cellulose
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-47, Double Garage Roof - Shingle Roofing Lab ID-Version‡: 23639679-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Shingle 1 ND
Black Roofing Shingle 2 ND
Black Roofing Shingle 3 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 1 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 2 ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
5% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Location: PHS-48, Double Garage Roof - Shingle Roofing Lab ID-Version‡: 23639680-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Shingle 1 ND
Black Roofing Shingle 2 ND
Black Roofing Shingle 3 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 1 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 2 ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
5% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 12 of 17 The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Page 285 of 344 ends

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT
Location: PHS-49, Double Garage Roof - Shingle Roofing Lab ID-Version‡: 23639681-1 Sample Layers Asbestos Content
Black Roofing Shingle 1 ND
Black Roofing Shingle 2 ND
Black Roofing Shingle 3 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 1 ND
Black Roofing Tar and Felt 2 ND
Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose
5% Glass Fibers
Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 13 of 17 The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Page 286 of 344 ends

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT

PROJECT ANALYST AND SIGNATORY REPORT
Project Analyst
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Analyst: Philip Newton
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4679564, Page 14 of 17

Page 287 of 344 ends

Page 15 of 17 ends

Page 288 of 344 ends

Page 16 of 17 ends

Page 289 of 344 ends

Page 17 of 17 ends

Page 290 of 344 ends

Lead Survey Report

Page 291 of 344 ends

1 | Page
Cardinal Environmental Consultants Inc.
2681 Dow Avenue Suite C-1
Tustin, California 92780
Phone: (714) 730-5931
Fax: (714) 730-1697
Date: August 31st, 2026
Owner/Client: The Olson Company
3010 Old Ranch Pkwy, Suite 100
Seal Beach, CA 90740
Site Address: 4742 Plumosa Dr
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Subject: Lead Inspection Report

To whom it may concern:

Cardinal Environmental Consultants conducted a lead inspection at 4742 Plumosa Dr. The survey was requested by the Contractor. All paint systems associated with the project(s) have been sampled in accordance with local and federal regulations. XRF data, sampling methodology and recommendations can be found on subsequent pages of this report.

Regulatory Compliance:

The EPA and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) have established quantitative standards for lead concentration in painted surfaces. The standard for public housing, above which abatement or removal is required, is 1.0 mg/cm2 or 0.5% lead by weight.

No official standard exists for school buildings. Los Angeles County and L.A. Unified School District are understood to have set a standard of 0.7 mg/cm2 – above which abatement is required. Currently most of the regulations relate specifically to abatement activities.

Generally, HUD (Department of Housing and Urban Development) initiated lead regulations which were then adopted by the state CDPH (California Department of Public Health).

Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule (RRP)
The new regulation outlines procedures for identifying lead paint and completing abatement of lead paint. Additional requirements for certification and clearances are also addressed.

Abatement activity triggers the regulation when paint systems with 1.0mg/C2 or .5% are disturbed.

Page 292 of 344 ends

2 | Page
The new EPA lead regulation, 40CFR 745, Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule (RRP), which became effective April 22, 2010, requires construction professionals to become “Certified Renovators” and firms to become “Certified Firms”. The regulation applies to all contractors, property managers and other building professionals who disturb painted surfaces while conducting plumbing, electrical, painting, drywall, flooring, window replacement, landscaping, construction, renovation, remodeling, and demolition work.

The new rule is instigated when more than six square feet of interior painted surfaces and twenty square feet of exterior surfaces are disturbed. As with HUD and the state adoption of HUD, the rule applies to lead paint systems above (1.0 mg/cm2 as indicated by an XRF device or .5% by weight).

The following is a table that outlines the regulations and requirements for each.

Lead Levels
Instigated
Training and
certifications
requirements
Disturbance
level
Firm
Licensing
Federal HUD
State CDPH

1.0mg/C2
or
.5%
Worker training and
certificate/special
state certificate for
supervisor
When conducting
abatement to
remove a lead
hazard for a period
of twenty years or
more
CSLB license
is required to
conduct
contract work
Federal Lead
Renovation
Rule

1.0mg/C2
or
.5%
Supervisor renovator
certificate/ at least
“in house” training
certificates for
additional workers
6 sf interior and 20
sf of exterior
Contracting
Firm must be
Certified
OSHA
1532.1
600 ppm
Or
.06%
no certificates
required
Initiated by
“trigger task” to
include manual
demolition and
sanding
No special
license
OSHA Compliance:

OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) through the regulation 1532.1 further delineates requirements for lead activities. 1532.1 defines “trigger tasks” (e.g., manual demolition, etc.) that disturb lead paint and the contractor responsibilities to its employees. The regulation specifically addresses PEL’s (permissible exposure limits) to staff disturbing lead paint. This regulation is initiated when “trigger task” work is implemented on paint systems with .06% or 600 ppm (parts per million). It should be noted that this level (.06%) is virtually any amount of lead paint. As of January 2002, OSHA now requires all contractors to notify the department when disturbing lead paint above 1.0mg/cm2. This level is the same threshold for abatement by HUD.

OSHA requires that the employer is required to protect their employees to the level stipulated in the Standard, or to do an exposure assessment. An exposure assessment is the air monitoring of an employee during lead work to determine his exposure and ultimately to determine the level of protection required. This assessment is applicable to paint systems above .06% or 600 ppm.

Page 293 of 344 ends

3 | Page
Methodology:

The data was developed using an X Ray Diffraction device, which reports lead content in milligrams per square centimeter of surface area (mg/cm2). The reading represents the quantity of lead between the surface and the substrate under the square centimeter of surface area contacted by the test device. If the substrate contains lead, the test result will be affected. (Galvanized metal is an example of this.) A positive reading by the XRF 100% confirms that lead was detected.

Results:

Location Material Lead Quantity
Bathroom 1 Wood Window
Frame

2.0 Each Window
System
Bathroom 1 Wood Window
Ledge

3.2 Each Window
System
Main Bedroom Wood Window
Frames

1.9 Each Window
System
Main Bathroom Wood Door Frame 1.9 1 Door Frame
Main Bathroom Ceramic Tile Wall 3.8 90 sf
Dining Room Wood Window
Frames

2.9 Each Window
System
Kitchen Wood Door Frame
Face

6.4 1 Door Frame Face
Kitchen Wood Door Frame
Face

1.5 1 Door Frame Face
Office Area Wood Window
Frame Leading to
Main Bedroom

5.8 3 Window Frames
Patio Wood Window
Frames

5.5 Each Window
System
Patio Wood Window
Frames Face

2.3 Each Window
System
Patio Wood Walls 2.8 All Wood Walls
Exterior House Metal Downspout
Pipe

1.8 1 Downspout Pipe
Exterior House Metal Roof Face 4.9 Each Roof Face
Exterior House Wood Roof Beams 4.2 Each Roof Beam
Exterior House Metal Rain Gutter 2.1 1 Rain Gutter

Page 294 of 344 ends

4 | Page
Exterior House Wood Window
Frames

6.0 Each Window
System
Exterior House Shingle Walls 3.7 All Shingle Walls
Exterior House Wood Walls 3.4 All Wood Walls
Additional Space
Exterior
Shingle Walls 2.4 All Shingle Walls
Additional Space
Exterior
Wood Window
Frame Faces

2.3 Each Window
System
Additional Space
Exterior
Window Ledges 2.0 Each Window
System
Living Room
Exterior
Wood Window
Frame Faces

2.6 Each Window
System
Living Room
Exterior
Wood Window
Frames

1.6 Each Window
System
Garage Exterior Wood Walls 3.0 All Wood Walls
Garage Exterior Wood Beams 2.6 Each Beam
Garage Exterior Window Frame
Faces

4.2 Each Window
System
The survey at 4742 Plumosa Dr had 78 XRF readings, covering representative building components, substrates, and paint colors on or in the buildings. Subsequent tables illustrate all of the paint systems at the school site. Regulations may apply to other components with lower levels of lead. The contractor is required to review and verify the scope of work for the project and determine the impact of activities on lead painted surfaces (at any level).

Summary/Recommendations:

Depending on the scope of work for the project, contractors should determine the level of contractor licensing for the abatement and/or work disturbing lead paint systems.

We recommend “lead certified” painting contractors for the painting of buildings coated with lead paint. Preparation of these surfaces falls under the “trigger task” category of OSHA 1532.1.

Preparation of painted surfaces and the ultimate “guarantee” of the final painted product is better completed by a “single” contractor.

RRP certified firms should be considered for incidental work that disturbs small amounts of lead paint. These categories of work may include concrete coring (through lead paint) and structure welding (door hinges etc.).

Abatement companies with CDPH (California Department of Public Health) lead certified staff will be required for all abatement work. The companies selected will have to ensure that a certified lead supervisor be present during abatement preparation and be within two hours (response time) during abatement activities.

Page 295 of 344 ends

5 | Page
Painting contractors will be required to collect all paint chips from the preparation activities. The contractor will sample and categorize the waste for disposal. Proof of sampling and waste disposal will be required. Metal components (coated with lead paint) will likely be recycled. A letter (stating acceptance of material) will be required from the contractor’s recycling facility.

All other waste produced from abatement activities will be separated and staged in a safe storage area at the project site during the sampling process. The characterization of the waste can take up to two weeks and an area will need to be allocated for this purpose. The contractor will be required to conduct and pay all costs associated with the characterization of the waste. Copies (proof) of all characterizations of waste will be demanded on completion and before waste transport.

Final Comments:

All materials found to be lead containing must be removed by a CDPH certified abatement company. Please refer to the table above for specified lead containing materials.

Sincerely yours,
CARDINAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC.,
A California Corporation
By:

Ronald R. McDaniel
California Certified Asbestos Consultant #01-2865
CDPH Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor and Project Monitor/Designer #3599 Certified Microbial Consultant by American Indoor Air Quality Council

Page 296 of 344 ends

Lead Sampling Data

Page 297 of 344 ends

4742 Plumosa Dr
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Lead Sampling Data
Date: 08/31/2025
Lead
Mg/cm2
Bedroom 1 Door Wood Beige ND Good
Bedroom 1 Door Frame Wood Beige ND Good
Bedroom 1 Door Frame Face Wood Beige ND Good
Bathroom 1 Shower Walls Ceramic Tile Brown ND Good
Bathroom 1 Window Frame Wood White 2.0 Good
Bathroom 1 Window Ledge Wood White 3.2 Good
Bathroom 1 Walls Wood White ND Good
Main Bedroom Door Wood Beige ND Good
Main Bedroom Door Frame Wood Beige ND Good
Main Bedroom Window Frames Wood White 1.9 Good
Main Bathroom Walls Drywall Light Brown ND Good
Main Bathroom Door Frame Wood White 1.9 Good
Main Bathroom Door Wood White ND Good
Main Bathroom Shower Walls Ceramic Tile Beige 3.8 Good
Main Bathroom Door to Exterior Wood White ND Good
Main Bathroom Door Frame to
Exterior Wood White ND Good
Attic Door Wood White ND Good
Attic Door Frame Wood White ND Good
Dinning Room Door Frame Wood Beige ND Good
Dinning Room Window Frames Wood Beige 2.9 Good
Location Component Substrate Color Condition
Lead Sampling Data Page 1

Page 298 of 344 ends

4742 Plumosa Dr
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Lead Sampling Data
Date: 08/31/2025
Lead
Mg/cm2 Location Component Substrate Color Condition
Dinning Room Window Ledge Wood Beige ND Good
Living Room Door Wood Beige ND Good
Living Room Door Frame Wood Beige ND Good
Living Room Walls Wood Beige ND Good
Living Room Ceiling Beam Wood Beige ND Good
Living Room Walls Drywall Beige ND Good
Living Room Door Frame Wood Beige ND Good
Kitchen Counters Wood Green ND Good
Kitchen Door Wood Beige ND Good
Kitchen Door Frame Face Wood Beige 6.4 Good
Kitchen Sink Metal White ND Good
Kitchen Door Frame Wood Beige ND Good
Kitchen Door Frame Face Wood Beige 1.5 Good
Laundry Area Door Frame Face Wood Beige ND Good
Laundry Area Window Frames Wood Beige ND Good
Laundry Area Window Ledge Wood Beige ND Good
Laundry Area Walls Wood Beige ND Good
Laundry Area Covebase Wood White ND Good
Bedroom 2 Window Frames Wood White ND Good
Bedroom 2 Window Ledges Wood White ND Good
Lead Sampling Data Page 2

Page 299 of 344 ends

4742 Plumosa Dr
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Lead Sampling Data
Date: 08/31/2025
Lead
Mg/cm2 Location Component Substrate Color Condition
Office Area
Window Frames
Leading to Main
Bedroom
Wood Blue 5.8 Good
Office Area Window Frames
Leading to Outside Wood Blue ND Good
Office Area, Additional
Living Area Walls Wood Beige ND Good
Patio Window Frames Wood Green 5.5 Good
Patio Window Frame
Faces Wood Green 2.3 Good
Patio Walls Wood White 2.8 Good
Patio Fence Metal Green ND Good
Patio Columns Metal White ND Good
Patio Ceiling Metal White ND Good
Exterior House Downspout Pipe Metal White 1.8 Good
Exterior House Roof Flashing Metal Green ND Good
Exterior House Roof Face Metal Green 4.9 Good
Exterior House Roof Beams Wood Green 4.2 Good
Exterior House Rain Gutter Metal White 2.1 Good
Exterior House Power Meter Box Metal Green ND Good
Exterior House Window Frames Wood Green 6.0 Good
Exterior House Walls Shingles White 3.7 Good
Exterior House Walls Wood White 3.4 Good
Additional Space Exterior Walls Shingles White 2.4 Good Additional Space Exterior Window Frames Wood Green ND Good Lead Sampling Data Page 3

Page 300 of 344 ends

4742 Plumosa Dr
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
Lead Sampling Data
Date: 08/31/2025
Lead
Mg/cm2 Location Component Substrate Color Condition
Additional Space Exterior Window Frame
Faces Wood Green 2.3 Good
Additional Space Exterior Window Ledges Wood Green 2.0 Good Living Room Exterior Window Frames Plastic White ND Good Living Room Exterior Window Frame
Faces Wood Green 2.6 Good
Living Room Exterior Window Frames Wood Green 1.6 Good
Garage Exterior Walls Wood White 3.0 Good
Garage Exterior Beams Wood Green 2.6 Good
Garage Exterior Window Frame
Faces Wood Green 4.2 Good
Garage Exterior Roofing Face Wood Green ND Good
Garage Exterior Roof Flashing Metal Green ND Good
Tool Room Exterior Door Frame Metal Green ND Good
Tool Room Exterior Door Metal Green ND Good
Tool Room Exterior Walls Wood White ND Good
Tool Room Exterior Window Frame
Faces Wood Green ND Good
Tool Room Exterior Downspout Pipe Metal White ND Good
Tool Room Exterior Rain Gutter Metal White ND Good
Tool Room Exterior Roof Beams Wood White ND Good
Tool Room Exterior Ceiling Wood White ND Good
Lead Sampling Data Page 4

Page 301 of 344 ends

Page 302 of 344 ends

Page 303 of 344 ends

CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2026
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MARCIA BROWN, CMC, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND AGENCY REPORTS

RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file this report.

DISCUSSION
City Council members serve on a number of outside committees and agencies. Attached are updates received recently from these agencies.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Reports from City Council Organizations, Agencies and Committees

Page 304 of 344 ends

Transportation Corridor Agencies
For the September 10, 2026, Meeting

BOARD MEETING HIGHLIGHTS

F/ETCA BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Patricia Kelley, Chair,

MISSION VIEJO
Scott Voigts, Vice Chair,

LAKE FOREST
Natalie Meeks,

ANAHEIM
Mike Frost,

DANA POINT
William Go,
IRVINE
Denis Bilodeau,
ORANGE
Anthony Beall,

RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA
John Taylor,

SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
David Penaloza,

SANTA ANA
Ray Schnell,
TUSTIN
Peggy Huang,

YORBA LINDA
Donald P. Wagner,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, 3RD DIST.

Doug Chaffee,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, 4TH DIST.

Katrina Foley,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, 5TH DIST.

Lan Zhou, Ex Officio Member,
CALTRANS DIST. 12

SJHTCA BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Stephanie Oddo, Chair,

LAGUNA NIGUEL
David Penaloza, Vice Chair,

SANTA ANA
Tim Zandbergen,

ALISO VIEJO
John Stephens,

COSTA MESA
Mike Frost,

DANA POINT
William Go,
IRVINE
Erica Pezold,

LAGUNA HILLS
Cynthia Conners,

LAGUNA WOODS
Patricia Kelley,

MISSION VIEJO
Robyn Grant,

NEWPORT BEACH
John Taylor,

SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
Donald P. Wagner,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, 3RD DIST.

Katrina Foley,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, 5TH DIST.

Lan Zhou, Ex Officio Member,
CALTRANS DIST. 12
73/133/241/261 TOLL ROADS

CUSTOMER SERVICE EXCELLENCE CONTINUES WITH RECORD

PERFORMANCE METRICS
The San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency (SJHTCA) and Foothill/ Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency (F/ETCA) Boards received the Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Annual Customer Service Report, which highlighted continued excellence in customer service performance, customer feedback, self-service adoption, and account growth.

The report showed significant improvements in operational performance, including a significant reduction in average wait times and a 41% decrease in incoming call volume following the elevated activity experienced during the prior year’s nationwide smishing scam. Customer satisfaction remained strong, achieving the agencies’ goal with a rating of 4.5 out of 5, while more than 143,000 customer surveys were completed during the year.

The Toll Roads customer service center achieved a record Net Promoter Score of 76%, the highest since the survey program was implemented and well above the benchmark for excellence. The report also highlighted continued growth in convenient, self-service options, with more than 527,000 PayNearMe transactions completed and 71% of account management functions handled through self-service channels. Additionally, nearly 195,000 new accounts were added during FY26, helping surpass the milestone of 3 million total accounts. 241/91 EXPRESS CONNECTOR PROJECT—WINDY RIDGE TASK ORDER The F/ETCA Board approved a task order with TransCore to support toll system modifications at the northbound Windy Ridge toll plaza as part of the 241/91 Express Connector Project.

The work will prepare the existing toll collection system for both temporary and final lane configurations needed to support construction of the regionally significant project, which will provide a direct connection between the 241 Toll Road and the 91 Express Lanes. Modifications include relocating existing tolling equipment, removing legacy toll collection infrastructure, and installing upgraded all-electronic tolling equipment to maintain seamless toll collection operations throughout construction.

TransCore will perform the highly complex work in coordination with the project’s civil construction activities. The phased improvements will ensure continuity of revenue collection while accommodating construction activities scheduled to begin in late 2026.

ENHANCING CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY THROUGH NEW

CLOUD SERVICES CONTRACT
A contract with CallTower, Inc. for Genesys Cloud licensing and support services was approved by the Boards of Directors, ensuring continued operation and enhancement of the Agencies’ customer engagement platform that supports customer service phone operations, interactive voice response (IVR), digital channels, reporting, and analytics.

CallTower was unanimously identified as the highest-ranked firm and determined to provide the best overall value for the Agencies. The firm demonstrated strong expertise in Genesys Cloud services, managed support, platform administration, and advanced artificial intelligence capabilities that can support future customer service initiatives.

Page 305 of 344 ends

The new agreement will provide ongoing technical support, subscription management, platform monitoring, incident management, and assistance with emerging AI-driven customer service tools. The contract also delivers a 25% reduction in unit pricing compared to the Agencies’ current service agreement. The proposed contract will help maintain reliable customer service operations while providing opportunities to leverage new technologies to enhance the overall customer experience.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UPDATES
CEO Ryan Chamberlain highlighted TCA’s recent partnership with the Association of California Cities, Orange County (ACC-OC) to host an executive briefing and roadway network tour as part of the organization’s Better Opportunity for Learning and Development (BOLD) Program.

The event provided transportation and civic leaders from across Orange County with an overview of TCA’s role in the regional transportation network, updates on key capital improvement projects and toll operations, and a firsthand look at tolling technology during a tour of the Tomato Springs Toll Plaza. Chamberlain thanked Board Chairs Kelley and Oddo for their participation and leadership during the event.

In addition, CEO Chamberlain announced that TCA and its project partners received an Award of Merit in Planning Excellence from the American Planning Association (APA) Orange County Section for the 241/91 Express Connector Project. The award recognizes innovative planning efforts, meaningful public engagement, and projects that advance mobility while addressing community needs and regional transportation objectives.

Page 306 of 344 ends

REPORT
Southern California Association of Governments
October 1, 2026
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Information Only - No Action Required
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

This item supports the following Strategic Priority 1: Establish and implement a regional vision for a sustainable future. 2: Be a cohesive and influential voice for the region. 3: Spur innovation and action through leadership in research, analysis and information sharing.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

State housing law requires that SCAG conduct the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) process every 8 years. At the start of each RHNA cycle, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) issues a Regional Housing Needs Determination (RHND) to each Council of Government (COG). The RHND for the upcoming 7th RHNA cycle has not yet been issued and is expected to be provided to SCAG by HCD by October 2026.

To provide background and context for the release of the RHND and 7th cycle RHNA, SCAG has invited David Zisser, Deputy Director for Housing Policy Development, Melinda Coy, Assistant Deputy Director for Housing Accountability, and Zach McRae, Deputy Director for Fair Housing and Tribal Affairs to provide a presentation.

BACKGROUND:

The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) is a state-mandated planning process authorized under California Government Code Section 65584. The RHNA process occurs in eight-year planning cycles and is intended to ensure that local governments plan for adequate housing to meet current and future demand at all income levels. Cities and counties are responsible for planning for their assigned housing need through their Housing Element.

At the start of each RHNA cycle, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) issues a Regional Housing Needs Determination (RHND) to each Council of Government (COG).

In making the regional determination, HCD consults with the relevant COG and the California To: RC - Regional Council
From: Elizabeth Carvajal, Deputy Director (Land Use)
213-236-1801, [email protected]
Subject: Regional Housing Needs Assessment Overview
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S

APPROVAL
AGENDA ITEM 12

Page 307 of 344 ends

213
REPORT
Department of Finance (DOF) and considers a range of factors set forth in statute, including population projections, household growth, vacancy rates, overcrowding, housing cost burden, and the relationship between jobs and housing. HCD is responsible for determining the total housing need for the region, while the COG is responsible for developing and adopting a methodology to allocate that regional need among individual jurisdictions.

For the current 6th RHNA cycle, covering the planning period from October 2021 through October 2029, HCD determined a total regional housing need of 1,341,827 units for the SCAG region. The RHND for the upcoming 7th RHNA cycle has not yet been issued and is expected to be provided to SCAG by HCD by October 2026.

Once the regional determination is received, SCAG develops an allocation methodology to distribute the housing need to cities and counties throughout the region. The methodology adopted by the COG can vary by cycle and differ from methodologies adopted by other COGs. Following approval of the final methodology, SCAG will release draft RHNA allocations to jurisdictions and begin the appeals process.

The appeals process begins after SCAG distributes the draft RHNA allocation to jurisdictions.

Jurisdictions may file an appeal on the draft allocation of their own jurisdiction or on any other jurisdiction. HCD may also file an appeal on a draft allocation. Filed appeals will be reviewed and determined by the RHNA Subcommittee as part of a public hearing. Decisions made by the RHNA Subcommittee are considered final and are not subject to further action by the CEHD Committee and Regional Council. Per statute, any reductions granted from successful appeals must be reallocated back to the region to ensure that the final RHNA allocation by income levels are maintained for the region.

Changes from the appeals process and any associated reallocation of units will be folded into the final RHNA allocation. The final RHNA allocation will be ultimately adopted by the Regional Council and then transmitted to HCD for final approval. Jurisdictions will then be required to plan and zone for their assigned housing need through their Housing Elements for the 2029–2037 planning period.

Jurisdictions are required to update their Housing Element to accommodate their RHNA allocation through sites and zoning analysis and other programs. Jurisdictions are not directly penalized if the units are not built during the planning period, though they must ensure that the sites are available for development and ensure adequate sites to accommodate RHNA through the end of the planning period.

The final RHNA allocation is anticipated to be adopted in April 2028 by the SCAG Regional Council.

Housing elements for jurisdictions in Riverside, Orange, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties are

Page 308 of 344 ends

214
REPORT
due in October 2029. Due to recent legislation, Housing Elements for jurisdictions in Los Angeles and Imperial Counties are due in April 2030.

Concurrent to SCAG’s RHNA process, Government Code 65584.03 allows for two or more jurisdictions (two or more cities or unincorporated counties or any combination of them) that are geographically contiguous to form a subregional entity for RHNA purposes, also known as subregional delegation.

The “subregion” would be assigned a share of SCAG’s regional housing need determination. It then develops its own methodology, subject to HCD approval, and conducts its own appeals process. Its final RHNA allocations for the subregion are then folded back into SCAG’s final RHNA allocation.

Subregional delegation is subject to the same requirements of RHNA statute as the COG, including furthering statutory objectives and HCD review and approval of the methodology. SCAG staff will provide more information about subregional delegation at an upcoming RHNA Subcommittee meeting.

Legal Framework and Statutory Requirements
Legal Framework: What State Law Requires
California Government Code Section 65584 establishes the legal framework for the RHNA process.

The statute assigns responsibility to HCD to determine each region’s housing need, and requires COGs to develop a methodology for allocating that need to local jurisdictions. The RHNA methodology and resulting allocation plan must be developed in a manner that is consistent with state law and that advances all five of the following statutory objectives:

1. Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner, which shall result in each jurisdiction receiving an allocation of units for low- and very low-income households. The regional housing needs allocation plan shall allocate units for extremely low and acutely low income households in a manner that is roughly proportional to, and within a range of 3 percent of, the housing need for very low-income households.

2. Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, the encouragement of efficient development patterns, and the achievement of the region’s greenhouse gas reductions targets provided by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Section 65080.

3. Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing, including an improved balance between the number of low-wage jobs and the number of housing units affordable to low-wage workers in each jurisdiction.

4. Allocating a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category, as compared to the

Page 309 of 344 ends

215
REPORT
countywide distribution of households in that category from the most recent American Community Survey.

5. Affirmatively furthering fair housing.

Required Methodology Factors
State law does not provide SCAG with unlimited discretion to develop a RHNA methodology. It requires COGs to develop the methodology in consultation with HCD and consider factors in Government Code Section 65584.04(e) such as jobs-housing relationships, projected household and employment growth, access to transit and existing transportation infrastructure, availability of land suitable for residential development, infill and increased-density opportunities, infrastructure constraints, environmental and agricultural resource constraints, climate-related risks, fair housing, and access to opportunity where sufficient data is available.

State law also restricts considering several factors as a basis for reducing a jurisdictions RHNA allocation. These include local ordinances or standards that limit the number of residential building permits issued, underproduction of housing from previous RHNA cycles, and stable population numbers. The methodology must further the statutory RHNA objectives and be applied uniformly across the region. After developing a proposed methodology with the RHNA Subcommittee and conducting a public comment process, SCAG will develop a draft methodology and submit it to HCD for review. After HCD’s review and SCAG revising the draft methodology with any necessary revisions to receive HCD’s approval, the final methodology will be considered through SCAG’s committee process, including review and approval by the RHNA Subcommittee, CEHD Committee, and Regional Council.

Statutory Changes for the 7th Cycle
Since adoption of the 6th Cycle RHNA allocation plan, the Legislature has enacted several statutory changes that will affect the development of the 7th Cycle RHNA process. These changes influence the RHND, RHNA methodology, and overall timeline:
• Earlier RHND - HCD is now required to determine a region's housing need three years prior to the statutory housing element deadline, rather than two years prior as required in previous cycles (AB 1275).
• Homelessness - State law now requires HCD to consider the housing needs of individuals and families experiencing homelessness when determining the RHND. SCAG is required to provide this information on homelessness to inform HCD’s determination (AB 3093). • Cost Burdened and Overcrowded Households – HCD will now compare the percentage of cost burdened and overcrowded households to national rates, rather than to comparable regional housing markets, when determining the RHND (AB 130).

Page 310 of 344 ends

216
REPORT
• New Income Categories – RHNDs, RHNA allocations, and housing elements must include separate categories for acutely low-income and extremely low-income households. As a result, jurisdictions will now plan for six income categories rather than the traditional four categories used in prior RHNA cycles (AB 3093).
• Student Housing - Recent legislation requires consideration of enrollment growth at University of California (UC) and California State University (CSU) campuses as part of both the RHND and RHNA processes (SB 486).
• Climate Factors – State law requires SCAG to consider including climate-related factors, such as wildfire risk, evacuation constraints, and sea-level rise, when developing the RHNA methodology (AB 1445).
• Sustainable Communities Strategy - Whereas prior law required RHNA allocations to be consistent with the development pattern in the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), the 7th Cycle only requires that the RHNA plan is informed by the SCS (AB 1275). • Subregional Allocation - Changes to state law require that subregions receive a share of the regional housing need that is proportional to their share of the adopted RHNA plan from the previous cycle (AB 1275).
• Expanded HCD Oversight – If HCD determines that SCAG’s proposed methodology fails to further RHNA objectives, SCAG must revise its methodology in consultation with HCD before proceeding (AB 1275).
• Streamlined RHNA Timelines - HCD's review period for an adopted RHNA methodology has been reduced from 90 days to 45 days, and its review period for the final RHNA allocation plan has been reduced from 30 days to 15 days. Additionally, the timeframe for jurisdictions to file RHNA appeals has been reduced from 45 days to 30 days, and the public notice period for RHNA appeal hearings has been reduced from 21 days to 10 days (SB 7) Roles and Responsibilities
HCD
HCD is responsible for determining the total regional housing need that must be accommodated during each RHNA planning cycle. In developing the RHND, HCD consults with SCAG and DOF and evaluates demographic and housing data. HCD also reviews the proposed RHNA methodology developed by SCAG to ensure that it is consistent with statutory requirements and furthers all five statutory objectives. Once SCAG adopts a final RHNA Allocation Plan, HCD oversees local Housing Element compliance and reviews jurisdictions' Housing Element updates.

SCAG
SCAG is responsible for allocating the region's housing need among its member jurisdictions.

Following receipt of the RHND, SCAG develops a RHNA methodology in consultation with HCD and in accordance with state law, including obtaining HCD approval of the methodology. The methodology must further the statutory RHNA objectives and consider the methodology factors identified in

Page 311 of 344 ends

217
REPORT
Government Code Section 65584.04. SCAG conducts public outreach, solicits input from jurisdictions and stakeholders, develops a draft allocation plan, administers the appeals process, and ultimately adopts the final RHNA Allocation Plan for the region.

RHNA Subcommittee
The RHNA Subcommittee plays a key role in SCAG’s RHNA process by providing policy guidance, reviewing key materials, supporting robust and transparent public discussions, and shaping recommendations to SCAG’s CEHD Committee and Regional Council. Its primary responsibilities will include developing the proposed RHNA methodology, overseeing the release of the draft and proposed final RHNA allocations, and hearing appeals related to draft RHNA allocations. The Subcommittee may not modify HCD's RHND or override statutory requirements governing the RHNA process. Decisions made by the RHNA Subcommittee will serve as recommendations to SCAG’s CEHD Committee and Regional Council, except the RHNA Subcommittee will make the final decisions regarding all appeals of draft RHNA allocations.

Local Jurisdictions
Local jurisdictions influence the RHNA process by participating in surveys to develop the proposed methodology and public comment opportunities. Jurisdictions also have the opportunity to review the proposed methodology and provide feedback during the public review process. Following release of the draft RHNA Allocation Plan, local jurisdictions may file appeals consistent with the procedures established in state law. Once SCAG adopts a final RHNA Allocation Plan, each jurisdiction is responsible for updating its Housing Element to accommodate its assigned share of the region's housing need across all income levels during the planning period.

What SCAG Can Influence vs. What SCAG Must Follow
SCAG is responsible for developing a RHNA methodology that distributes the region's housing need among local jurisdictions. In carrying out this responsibility, SCAG must comply with state housing law by advancing the statutory RHNA objectives, utilizing the final RHND, following required public participation and appeals procedures, and addressing HCD comments on the proposed methodology.

SCAG can appeal to reduce the RHND, but HCD has the responsibility of making the final determination. SCAG cannot disregard statutory requirements, or adopt a methodology that is contrary to state law or applied inconsistently across the region.

Within these requirements, however, SCAG has discretion in how it designs the RHNA methodology.

This includes selecting and applying data sources, determining the weighting of methodology factors, incorporating public and local jurisdiction feedback, and deciding how statutory objectives are reflected in the allocation approach. SCAG may also help inform the RHND through consultation with HCD before the regional determination is finalized.

Page 312 of 344 ends

218
REPORT
RHNA Timeline:

The major milestones of the 7th RHNA schedule are outlined below. Actual dates are subject to change, and staff will keep the RHNA Subcommittee and the public informed as additional information becomes available.

RHNA Milestones Timeline
Date Milestone
August 2026 RHNA Subcommittee Kickoff
Meeting/Consultations with HCD
October 2026 Deadline for HCD to issue the RHND
September 2026 - March 2027 Development of Proposed RHNA allocation Methodology
Early Spring 2027 RHNA Methodology Hearings and Public
Comment Period
July 2027 Send Draft RHNA Methodology to HCD
October 2027 Release of Draft RHNA Allocation Plan
Early Winter 2028 RHNA Appeals Hearings
April 2028 Adoption of Final RHNA Allocation Plan
Next Steps
Staff will continue to brief the RHNA Subcommittee on statutory requirements, the regional determination process, data inputs, and potential methodology considerations. After HCD issues SCAG’s Regional Housing Needs Determination, staff will engage the RHNA Subcommittee, CEHD and Regional Council and will begin development of the proposed RHNA methodology, including opportunities for Subcommittee discussion, public input, and coordination with HCD.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Work associated with this item is included in the FY27 General Fund (800.0160.03): Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).

Page 313 of 344 ends

219

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2026
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JAMIE LAI, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER PREPARED BY: RICK YEE, P.E., DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-6008 TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY AT 22401

OLD CANAL ROAD FOR THE SAVI RANCH PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT

PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2026-6008 determining that the public interest and necessity require the City to acquire property interests at 22401 Old Canal Road, and authorizing condemnation of those interests for the Savi Ranch Parkway Improvement Project.

SUMMARY
The Savi Ranch Parkway Improvement Project will increase vehicle capacity, improve pedestrian walkways and maximize circulation along Savi Ranch Parkway between Yorba Linda Boulevard and Mirage Street. The City must acquire portions of the landscaped slopes at 22401 Old Canal Road to construct these improvements. The property is leased to Sprouts Farmers Market. The project will not require the relocation of any residents or businesses.

The recommended resolution finds that the City has fulfilled the necessary prerequisites to exercise eminent domain to acquire the required property and doing so serves the public interest. Negotiations with the property owner are ongoing and the compensation terms are not a necessary part of the resolution.

DISCUSSION
The City intends to acquire a permanent roadway and public utility easement of approximately 9,576 square feet and a temporary construction easement of approximately 16,885 square feet from the property to accommodate the project’s improvements to the public roadway and pedestrian facilities. The permanent easement will affect existing landscape slope areas, while the temporary construction easement will affect 19 existing parking spaces during a portion of construction. The temporary construction easement will have a term of up to 36 months, including a six-month exclusive-use period during physical

Page 314 of 344 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-6008 SAVI RANCH PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT construction. Reasonable and safe pedestrian and vehicular access to the remainder of the property will be maintained throughout construction. The property’s tenant, Sprouts Farmers Market, will remain fully operational throughout the project.

Pursuant to Government Code § 7267.2, the City obtained an appraisal and submitted an initial offer to the property owner, Yorbook, LLC, on May 6, 2026. Since then, Public Works and the City’s Right-of-Way Agent have made concerted efforts to negotiate with the owner’s legal representative. In response to concerns regarding the temporary easement limits, the City reduced the easement area, obtained a revised appraisal, and submitted a revised offer on September 11, 2026. At the owner’s representative’s request, the easement limits were also staked in the field, and the City held a meeting with all parties to address questions and clarify the project.

Resolution No. 2026-6008 is a resolution of necessity under California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 1245.210, et seq. Such a resolution must be considered and approved by the legislative body prior to any exercise of eminent domain to acquire property. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 1245.240, the resolution must be passed by a two-thirds vote of all the members of the City Council, which is four affirmative votes.

The California Eminent Domain Law provides the findings that must be made in a resolution of necessity. These are:
 That the public interest and necessity require the project for which the property is recommended to be acquired;
 That the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
 That the property recommended to be acquired is necessary for the project; and  That the offer required by Government Code § 7267.2 has been made to the owner of record.

In addition, the recommended resolution finds that the City has met all other procedural prerequisites for the exercise of eminent domain on the property, including a determination that the City reviewed the project under applicable environmental review procedures. The project’s environmental impacts were reviewed in connection with a Mitigated Negative Declaration approved on January 19, 2021. Additionally, the Planning Commission determined on May 14, 2025, that the City’s acquisition of the property is consistent with the City’s General Plan pursuant to Government Code § 65402.

The property owner, and/or their representative, has a right to appear and be heard on the matters encompassed within the resolution affecting their property. As required by the California Eminent Domain Law, the City gave the property owner notice of the City Council’s consideration of the resolution of necessity, and of the opportunity to appear and be heard on whether the City has undertaken all required steps and met all procedural prerequisites to the exercise of eminent domain.

Page 315 of 344 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-6008 SAVI RANCH PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT The facts supporting the various prerequisite findings are included with greater detail within the resolution of necessity. Generally, the public interest and necessity require the project, because it is designed to improve vehicle circulation through Savi Ranch Parkway. The project is located in a manner most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury because the permanent acquisition areas on the property are limited to portions of the slope that do not impact the functional use of the property. Additionally, the project is designed in a manner compatible with the greatest public good because the project will improve overall circulation for both vehicles and pedestrians and enhance the utility of the area.

Negotiations remain ongoing but the parties have not yet reached a final agreement for the acquisition of the property interest. Public Works will continue to pursue a mutually agreeable resolution. The amount of compensation due for the property interests involved is not a subject of the resolution of necessity, and therefore not before City Council as an issue to be considered as part of this resolution.

If the City Council adopts the recommended resolution, the City will initiate eminent domain proceedings which will lead to a determination of the fair market value of the property interests recommended to be taken through court proceedings. If City Council does not adopt the resolution, the City will risk potential loss of federal funding as the milestone delivery date for completing the right-of-way phase may not be met.

FISCAL IMPACT
If the City Council initiates eminent domain proceedings, the City must deposit the appraised value of the property interests with the State Treasurer’s Office. The City’s independent appraisal valued the property interests at $276,000 as of September 2026.

If the matter proceeds to court, the City will also incur legal, appraisal and court costs. The court will determine the final compensation for the property interests.

The project budget includes sufficient funding to complete the necessary property acquisition through negotiation or eminent domain.

ALTERNATIVES
Do not approve the recommendation and provide alternative direction.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2026-6008

2. Notice of Hearing Re: Adoption of Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Property by Eminent Domain (California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235)

Page 316 of 344 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-6008

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF YORBA LINDA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND

DETERMINING THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY

FOR ACQUIRING AND AUTHORIZING THE

CONDEMNATION OF PORTIONS OF PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 22401 OLD CANAL ROAD (APN 352-113-
01, 352-113-02), YORBA LINDA, CALIFORNIA FOR

PURPOSES OF THE SAVI RANCH PARKWAY

IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Yorba Linda (“City”) has been investigating the potential acquisition of portions of real property located at 22401 Old Canal Road, Yorba Linda, California (APN 352-113-01, 352-113-02) (“Property”), for the purpose of accommodating public roadway improvements consistent with the circulation element of the General Plan of the City; and
WHEREAS, after no less than fifteen (15) days written notice to the owners of the Property referenced above, and more specifically described and depicted in Exhibits “1” through “4”, which legal descriptions and depictions are incorporated herein by reference, the City Council of the City of Yorba Linda, on October 6, 2026, held a hearing for the purposes of allowing the record owners of such property reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard regarding the City’s identification of the “Project”, and on the following matters:

A. Whether the public interest and necessity require the Project; B. Whether the Project is planned or located in a manner which is most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; C. Whether the Property proposed to be acquired is necessary for the Project; and
D. Whether the offer required by Government Code § 7267.2 had been given to the owners of record;
and whether the City had properly exercised all of its statutory responsibilities and duties antecedent to the exercise of eminent domain against the Property, including review under CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, as a result of such hearing, has determined that the public health, safety and welfare require that the City acquire the Property, for the purposes of improving vehicular circulation through Savi Ranch Parkway and adjoining intersections at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Mirage Street; and

Page 317 of 344 ends

R E S O L U T I O N N O . 202 6 - 6 0 0 8
P A G E 2
WHEREAS, the Project for which the Property is to be acquired was reviewed under applicable environmental review procedures, including completion of a Mitigated Negative Declaration in January 2021; and
WHEREAS, the City is hereby authorized and empowered to acquire the Property by eminent domain for the proposed Project in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 1230.010 et seq., Government Code sections 37350.5 and 40404, the Constitution of California, and California Eminent Domain Law.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Yorba Linda, California, that the City Council does hereby find, determine and declare upon evidence presented to the City Council as follows:

SECTION 1. The Project for which the property is being acquired is the Savi Ranch Parkway Improvement, which consists of providing improved vehicular capacity and pedestrian improvements along Savi Ranch Parkway between Yorba Linda Boulevard and Mirage Street while also improving circulation at the respective intersections. The City is authorized to acquire the property interests described herein by eminent domain pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1230.010 et seq. and Government Code sections 37350.5 and 40404.

SECTION 2. The Property to be acquired is located at 22401 Old Canal Road, Yorba Linda, California (APN 352-113-01 and 352-113-02). The portions of Property the City seeks to acquire, and the Property interests sought, consist of the following:

A. A permanent roadway and public utility easement consisting of approximately 9,576 square feet, as legally described in the exhibit attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and depicted in the diagram attached as Exhibit 2. The permanent roadway and public utility easement interest sought to be acquired over this portion of the Property consists of the following:

A perpetual easement for public right-of-way and roadway purposes, including all use of the easement area for purposes incident to public rightof-way use, including but not limited to the construction, maintenance, and operation of a roadway, underground and above-ground utilities and appurtenances, cable communication or telecommunication facilities, directional, street identification or motorist or pedestrian informational signage, traffic control devices, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, landscaping, drainage and sewage facilities, and transportation facilities such as bus bays, benches, bus or train stops, bicycle pathways, or facilities for other public transportation vehicles or manners of conveyance.

Page 318 of 344 ends

R E S O L U T I O N N O . 202 6 - 6 0 0 8
P A G E 3
B. A temporary construction easement over approximately 16,885 square feet of the Property, legally described in Exhibit 3 and depicted in Exhibit 4 hereto. The temporary construction easement shall consist of the interests described below:

The temporary construction easement is a non-exclusive easement for a period of thirty-six (36) months, which includes a six (6) consecutive month exclusive-use period during actual physical construction (the “Construction Period”), and which permits the City of Yorba Linda, its officers, agents, employees, and contractors, to enter upon, occupy, and pass over the temporary construction easement area more specifically described in the legal description attached as Exhibit 3, as deemed reasonably necessary for all purposes incidental to the Project. The six (6) month Construction Period refers solely to the duration of time during which the temporary construction easement area will be used exclusively for construction activities, and not to any separate or reduced physical portion of the temporary construction easement area. For the remainder of the thirty-six (36) month term outside the Construction Period, the temporary construction easement shall be non-exclusive. During the Construction Period, and only during the Construction Period, the temporary construction easement shall include the right to perform within the temporary construction easement area any necessary excavation, grading, earth fill, compaction, installation of concrete forms, landscaping, irrigation, utility, and sign relocation, accommodation of private drainage facilities, and deposit of tools, equipment, and material for all such necessary activities which are reasonably incidental to the work being performed on said property in connection with the Project. Outside the Construction Period, the City’s use of the temporary construction easement shall be limited to non-exclusive entry and passage as reasonably necessary for purposes incidental to Project planning, and shall not include the right to conduct active physical construction activities of the kind enumerated above within the temporary construction easement area.

Such incidental activities during the Construction Period shall include, but not be limited to, utilizing the easement area for adjusting grade differentials between the planned street and the adjoining real property and/or matching existing concrete and/or asphalt paved areas, and/or natural grade areas; removal and reconstruction of walkways and pavement; re-establishment of landscaping and irrigation; and pedestrian access; or such work as may pertain to on-site improvements to render the easement area or the larger parcel to which it pertains in the same functional condition as reasonably practicable to the condition before the Project.

Access to the temporary construction easement area shall be from the public right-of-way. At the commencement of the Construction Period, the City may place a temporary fence around the temporary construction

Page 319 of 344 ends

R E S O L U T I O N N O . 202 6 - 6 0 0 8
P A G E 4
easement area; provided, however, that no fence shall be placed in such a manner as to impede reasonable access around or across any driveway.

Throughout the term of the temporary construction easement, including the Construction Period, reasonable and safe pedestrian and vehicular access to the remaining property outside of the temporary construction easement area shall be maintained, and the temporary construction easement shall not be exercised in a manner that would deprive the remaining property of reasonable access to the public right-of-way.

The temporary construction easement shall not include the right to store any materials or park any vehicles which are not incidental to the work to be performed on site in connection with the Project, nor to block vehicular access to the larger parcel of property of which the temporary construction easement area is a part, nor to exercise the uses of the easement outside of the temporary construction easement area.

The City shall provide the owner(s) and occupant(s) of the Property a minimum of thirty (30) days’ written notice as to when the Construction Period will commence. The rights granted hereunder shall continue in full force and effect until written notice to the owner of record that the temporary construction easement is no longer needed by the City, or thirty-six (36) months after notice of the initiation of the temporary construction easement, whichever is earlier. Upon termination of the Construction Period, the temporary construction easement area shall be restored to a condition that is as functionally equivalent as is practicable to its condition prior to the commencement of the work, consistent with the Project as designed and as to be constructed.

SECTION 3. The public interest and necessity require the Project, in that the Project is designed to provide for improved vehicle circulation through Savi Ranch Parkway and adjoining intersections at Yorba Linda Boulevard and Mirage Street.

Improvements include adding a traffic lane between Mirage Street and Yorba Linda Boulevard, enhancing key turn movements, and streamlining traffic flow to reduce congestion.

SECTION 4. The Project is located in a manner most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury, in that the permanent acquisition areas on the Sprouts property are limited to slivers of the existing slope that do not impact the functional use of the property, and the temporary construction easement is designed to preserve reasonable and safe access to the remaining property throughout construction. The Project is designed in a manner compatible with the greatest public good, in that the Project will provide improved circulation for both vehicles and pedestrians. This will enhance the utility of the area and alleviate congestion, improve safety and overall traffic circulation. The Project will not require the relocation of any businesses or residents.

Page 320 of 344 ends

R E S O L U T I O N N O . 202 6 - 6 0 0 8
P A G E 5
SECTION 5. The Property is necessary for the proposed Project, in that widening must occur on property immediately adjacent to the existing roadway and the improvements could not be accomplished without the aforementioned property acquisition. This will enhance the utility of the area and help improve traffic circulation.

SECTION 6. The offer required by Government Code section 7267.2(a), together with the accompanying statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount established as just compensation, has been made to the record owners, by way of letter dated September 11, 2026. Staff has attempted to negotiate with the record owners subsequent to this offer, but such negotiations have not proved successful in securing the necessary property interests outside of more formal proceedings.

SECTION 7. If and to the extent any portion of the Property is already devoted to a public use, the proposed Project is a more necessary public use pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 1240.610 et seq.

SECTION 8. The environmental impacts of the Project were reviewed in connection with the Mitigated Negative Declaration approved January 19, 2021.

SECTION 9. On May 14, 2025, the Planning Commission of the City of Yorba Linda determined that the City’s acquisition of the Property is consistent with the City’s General Plan pursuant to Government Code section 65402.

SECTION 10. The law firm of Rutan & Tucker LLP is hereby authorized to prepare and prosecute in the name of the City such proceeding or proceedings in the court having jurisdiction thereof as are necessary for such acquisition; and to prepare and file such pleadings, documents, and other instruments and to make such arguments and generally to take such action as may be necessary in the opinion of said attorneys to acquire for the City the Property, including the improvements thereon. Said attorneys are specifically authorized to take whatever steps and/or procedures are available to them under the eminent domain law of the State of California.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS CONSIDERED, PASSED, AND
APPROVED this 6th day of October, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Yorba Linda on this 6
th day of October, 2026.

Page 321 of 344 ends

R E S O L U T I O N N O . 202 6 - 6 0 0 8
P A G E 6
__________________________

CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, MAYOR

CITY OF YORBA LINDA
ATTEST:
______________________________

MARCIA BROWN, CITY CLERK

CITY OF YORBA LINDA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

RUTAN & TUCKER LLP

CITY ATTORNEY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.

COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, MARCIA BROWN, City Clerk of the City of Yorba Linda, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City of Yorba Linda held on the 6
th day of October, 2026, and was carried by the
following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MARCIA BROWN, CITY CLERK

CITY OF YORBA LINDA

Page 322 of 344 ends

Page 323 of 344 ends

Page 324 of 344 ends

Page 325 of 344 ends

Page 326 of 344 ends

OCTOBER 6, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 9 – ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-6008 TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY AT 22401 OLD CANAL ROAD FOR THE SAVI RANCH

PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
EXHIBITS 1- 4 TO RESOLUTION NO. 2026-6008

Page 327 of 344 ends

EXHIBIT 1

Page 328 of 344 ends

Page 329 of 344 ends

Page 330 of 344 ends

EXHIBIT 2

Page 331 of 344 ends

Page 332 of 344 ends

Page 333 of 344 ends

Page 334 of 344 ends

Page 335 of 344 ends

EXHIBIT 3

Page 336 of 344 ends

Page 337 of 344 ends

Page 338 of 344 ends

EXHIBIT 4

Page 339 of 344 ends

Page 340 of 344 ends

Page 341 of 344 ends

Page 342 of 344 ends

Page 343 of 344 ends

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

AGENDA SCHEDULING REQUEST FORM
TO: City Manager Peter Grant
FROM: Mayor Carlos Rodriguez
FOR (DATE OF COUNCIL MEETING): October 6, 2026
“OTHER BUSINESS” ITEM TO BE AGENDIZED:

TITLE OF REPORT/ ITEM:

Direct the City Manager to Develop a Recommendation to Install a Flagpole at Black Gold Golf Club
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

A resident recently brought to my attention that the City has never installed a flagpole to fly the flag of the United States at Black Gold Golf Course. As we celebrate 250 years of American independence, I believe the City Council should consider amending the FY 2026- 27 Capital Improvement Budget to include building a flagpole at the City’s golf club.

I respectfully request your support to direct the City Manager to develop a recommendation to the City Council to install a flagpole at Black Gold Golf Club. The recommendation should return to the City Council before the end of the year (if practical) and should include the flagpole location, project cost and funding source, and schedule.

CC: Mayor and City Council
City Clerk

Page 344 of 344 ends

Yorba Linda City CouncilOctober 6, 2026

Yorba Linda City Council
October 6, 2026