Agenda packet — Yucaipa City Council, September 23, 2024 (part 6 of 6)

October 2022
963

Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel; San Diego, California, 1999 — 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 —1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:

Rosenfeld P. E., Spaeth K., Hallman R., Bressler R., Smith, G., (2022) Cancer Risk and Diesel Exhaust Exposure Among Railroad Workers. Water Air Soil Pollution. 233, 171.

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks ofH=rdous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113-125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 12 October 2022
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 964

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Fortner Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor -Quality -Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199. - Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS-6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 12 October 2022
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 965

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 441h Western Regional Meeting, .American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA, Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States" Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Neater Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23" Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 12 October 2022
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 966

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium -Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23",Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23' Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHSAnnual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 — 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants — DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts, Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey's C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey's Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul. Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Lau, Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundvi,ater Association. Environmental Laiv Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 12 October 2022
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 967

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundivater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February- 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundivater Association. Southivest Focus Conference. iVater Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wasteivater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Asti to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. N"ater Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. [Vater Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society ofAmerica. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 12 October 2022
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 968

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldivell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, P1i.D. Page 7 of 12 October 2022
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 969

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round -up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Billy Wildrick, Plaintiff vs. BNSF Railway Company
Case No. CIVDS1711810
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-17-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County, State of Georgia
Richard Hutcherson, Plaintiff vs Norfolk Southern Railway Company Case No. 10-SCCV-092007
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2022
In the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Millard Clark, Plaintiff vs. Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al.

Case No. 2020-03891
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-15-2022
In The Circuit Court of Livingston County, State of Missouri, Circuit Civil Division Shirley Ralls, Plaintiff vs. Canadian Pacific Railway and Soo Line Railroad Case No. 18-LV-CCO020
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-7-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jonny C. Daniels, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. 20-CA-5502
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-1-2022
In The Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri Kieth Luke et. al. Plaintiff vs. Monsanto Company et. al.

Case No. 19SL-CCO3191
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-25-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jeffery S. Lamotte, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. NO. 20-CA-0049
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-22-2022
In State of Minnesota District Court, County of St. Louis Sixth Judicial District Greg Bean, Plaintiff vs. Soo Line Railroad Company
Case No. 69-DU-CV-21-760
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-17-2022
In United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma, Washington John D. Fitzgerald Plaintiff vs. BNSF
Case No. 3:2 1 -cv-05288-RJB
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-11-2022
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 12
October 2022
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda
970

In Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Macon Illinois Rocky Bennyhoff Plaintiff vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-L-56
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-3-2022
In Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County Ohio
Joe Briggins Plaintiff vs. CSX
Case No. A2004464
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-17-2022
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern George LaFazia vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. BCV-19-103087
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-17-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Bobby Earles vs. Penn Central et. al.

Case No. 2020-L-000550
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-16-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of Florida Albert Hartman Plaintiff vs. Illinois Central
Case No. 2:20-cv-1633
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-4-2022
In the Circuit Court of the 4`h Judicial Circuit, in and For Duval County, Florida Barbara Steele vs. CSX Transportation
Case No. 16-219-Ca-008796
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of New York Romano et al. vs. Northrup Grumman Corporation
Case No. 16-cv-5760
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-10-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Linda Benjamin vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 007599
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Donald Smith vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 003426
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-24-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Jan Holeman vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 000675
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-18-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County State of Georgia
Dwayne B. Garrett vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-SCCV-091232
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-10-2021
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 12 October 2022
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 971

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Ruepke vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 007730
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-5-2021
In the United States District Court For the District of Nebraska Steven Gillett vs. BNSF
Case No. 4:20-cv-03120
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-28-2021
In the Montana Thirteenth District Court of Yellowstone County James Eadus vs. Soo Line Railroad and BNSF
Case No. DV 19-1056
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-21-2021
In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.cvs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.

Case No. Oi9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-14-2021
Trial October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a

AMTRAK,
Case No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail Case No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al. vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case No. CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case No. 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No. 1716-CV 10006
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-30-2019
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 12 October 2022
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 972

In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS "Conti Perdido' Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles — Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles — Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19
In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiffs vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No. 1:16-cv-0253 l -RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 11211 Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No. 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition I1-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintifs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No. C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. Oi9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case No. 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warm Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No. LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2017
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Pagel 1 of 12 October 2022
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 973

In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No. RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No. LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action No. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition June 2015
In The Iowa District Court for Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No. 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17" Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case No. CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case No. cc- 11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 2:07CV 1052
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2009
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 12 of 12 October 2022
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 974

PUBLIC COMMENT 79
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 975

, ror meJ7,0
y
Gruen Jobs & Clean Communities
P.O. Box 79222
Corona, CA 92877
To: City of Yucaipa Planning Commission
I=
From: Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance
Subject: Freeway Corridor Specific Plan SIR
This letter is to serve as further comment in addition to all previously submitted comments and documents by Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance.

CalEnviroScreen Information
CalEnviroScreen is a mapping tool that helps identify California communities that are most affected by many sources of pollution, and where people are often especially vulnerable to pollution's effects. CalEnviroScreen uses environmental, health, and socioeconomic information to produce scores for every census tract in the state. The scores are mapped so that different communities can be compared. An area with a high score is one that experiences a much higher pollution burden than areas with low scores. CalEnviroScreen ranks communities based on data that are available from state and federal government sources. CalEnviroScreen is updated and maintained by The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, on behalf ofthe California Environmental Protection Agency.

CalEnviroScreen Data on : Freeway Corridor Specific Plan SIR Project Location/Area The above listed project is in census tract (6071008500). Refer to the following chart for information from the CalEnviroScreen data regarding the census tract the project is located.

Yucaipa — FCSP SIR
Census Tract: 6071008500
Population: 8,540
Overall Percentiles _
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Percentile 43%
Pollution Burden Percentile 1 80%
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 976

Exposures
%
Ozone
100%
Traffic
69%
Diesel Particulate Matter
55%
Particulate Matter 2.5
53%
Drinking Water
76%
Environmental Effects
%
Cleanup Sites
58%
Groundwater Threats
60%
Hazardous Waste
78%
Sensitive Populations
%
Cardiovascular Disease
61%
Socioeconomic factors
%
Unemployment
550/0
4-1,
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 977

Conclusion
Consider the above referenced information when making this important decision. Realize that you and the citizens of this area face some of the WORST POLLUTION in the entire state of California.

It is the responsibility of the City's elected and appointed officials to make environmentally responsible development decisions. Based on the CalEnviroScreen data, this is more than sufficient evidence of the further air quality impacts that the citizenry of Yucaipa will continue to encounter with further development of another warehouse. We are not against development, as we believe it is necessary for further economic growth in our current society. Development needs to be conducted with the highest of expectations to ensure the local population does not suffer further air quality burdens.

We stand by our comments and believe the SIR is flawed and should be redrafted and recirculated for public review.

Respectfully Submitted,
Steven Piepkorn
GSEJA
Source -
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/4af93 cf9888a424481 d2868391 af2d82/p age/home/?data_id=dataSource_2-1754d6afdb4- layer- 9%3A7306 Glossary of Terms
Ozone - Amount of daily maximum 8-hour Ozone concentration Particulate Matter 2.5 - Annual mean PM 2.5 concentrations Diesel Particulate Matter - Diesel PM emissions from on -road and non -road sources Toxic Releases - Toxicity -weighted concentrations of modeled chemical releases to air from
facility emissions and off -site incineration.

Traffic -Traffic density, in vehicle -kilometers per hour per road length, within 150 meters of the census tract boundary.
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 978

ATTACHMENT 9
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 979

2 Agenda Item No.

City of Yucaipa

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of June 5, 2024
A Regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Yucaipa, California was called to order in the Council Chambers, 34272 Yucaipa Boulevard, Yucaipa, on June 5, 2024, at 6:30 PM.

PRESENT: J.R. Allgower, Chair
Richard Beck, Commissioner
Stacey Chester, Commissioner
David Higginson, Commissioner
Donna Snodgrass, Commissioner
Lyle Vick, Commissioner
ABSENT: None
CITY STAFF: Benjamin Matlock, Deputy Director of Community Development/City Planner Michael Reiter, Assistant City Attorney
Katrina Kunkel, Associate Engineer
Christian Farmer, Assistant Planner
Maria Koolhoven, Planning Commission Assistant

CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 6:36 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Lyle Vick.

ROLL CALL
Michael Reiter, Assistant City Attorney informed the Commissioners that Tony Hicks resigned his seat as a Planning Commissioner before the start of the meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

The following members of the public spoke:
• Hansen Wang
Planning Commission Minutes Page 1
6-5-24/23/2024 City Council Agenda 980

PUBLIC HEARINGS
The order of Business for the Public Hearing Shall Be:

A. Open Public Hearing
B. Disclosure of Ex Parte Communications
C. Staff Presentation
D. Applicant/Representative Presentation (if necessary) E. Public Comments
F. Applicant Rebuttal (if necessary)
G. Public Hearing Closed
H. Commission Discussion

1. SUBJECT: FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE (CASE NO. 24- 044/GPA/SPA) & PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM): THE

EXISTING FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN (FCSP), ADOPTED IN NOVEMBER 2008, ALLOWS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 2,447 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 424.7 ACRES AND UP TO 4,585,779 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES ON 242.7 ACRES WITHIN THE 1,242-ACRE PLAN AREA. THE PROPOSED UPDATE TO THE FCSP (CASE NO. 24-044/GPA/SPA) WOULD RESULT IN A TOTAL OF 2,472 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 5,093,265 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES. AS A RESULT, THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD RESULT IN AN INCREASE OF 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 2,786,461 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK (BP), AND A REDUCTION OF 2,278,976

SQUARE FEET OF REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) COMPARED TO THE EXISTING FCSP. THE PROPOSED PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES DEVELOPMENT OF THE PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM), WHICH CONSISTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO (2) BUILDINGS WITH WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE SPACES, TOTALING 2,054,000 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING SPACE, AS WELL AS TRUCK

PARKING AND DOCKING BAYS, CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS INCLUDED IN THE FCSP UPDATE.

RECOMMENDATION:

Depending on the Planning Commission's review and recommendation, several potential motions can be made and are as follows:

Recommendation in support of the FCSP Update:

Planning Commission Minutes Page 2
6-51N23/2024 City Council Agenda 981

If the Planning Commission is in support of the FCSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-06, approving the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update; certifying that the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); accepting the mitigation measures identified in the Final SEIR; adopting Findings of Fact; and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and
2) Approve first reading, by title only, as read by staff, of Ordinance No. 448, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, amending Ordinance No. 343, amending of the official land use plan and zoning ordinance of the City of Yucaipa; and 3) Approve the Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21-196), subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in the Agenda Report, and if acceptable, approve the Architectural Design and preliminary landscaping, for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center Project (POCC); and 4) Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and 5) Approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and direct Staff to file a Notice of Determination.

Recommendation aizainst the FCSP Update:

If the Planning Commission is not in support of the FCSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:
1) Direct Staff to prepare a Resolution to deny the approval of the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update; and
2) Direct Staff to prepare Findings for denial, based on the Planning Commission's consideration of the Project with respect to Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code; and 3) Deny Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21-196), as it is inconsistent with the land use designations of the existing Freeway Corridor Specific Plan; and 4) Determine that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15270 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.

Alternatives:

The Planning Commission can make any additional recommendations to modify the FCSP Update that are deemed necessary to meet the Findings specified by Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code, or that would better meet the Goals, Policies, and/or Objectives of the General Plan.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 3
6-5U24-3/2024 City Council Agenda 982

Draft Findings of Approval, as well as the Draft Resolution and Ordinance are provided for the Planning Commission's reference and review. Modifications can be made based on the deliberations of the item and will be presented for the City Council's final action.

DISCUSSION:

The following ex parte communications were disclosed. Commissioner Chester met with Pacific Oaks for a meeting about the project and met with the Pumpkin Patch to see how this would affect them and their operation. Commissioner Vick noted that he met with the Pumpkin Patch owners and had a meeting with Pacific Oaks. Commissioner Snodgrass met with Tyler Rameson with the Pumpkin Patch and had a meeting with Pacific Oaks and spoke with Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Bengamin Matlock and Commissioner Chester. Commissioner Beck had no ex parte to disclose.

Commissioner Higginson had a meeting with Pacific Oaks and met with representatives from the Pumpkin Patch. Staff noted that the meetings with Pacific Oaks consisted of materials that were presented in the agenda packet.

Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock presented the Agenda Report.

Commissioner Chester noted traffic concerns and asked staff if the number of big rig trucks staging throughout the city were accounted for in the traffic study. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock stated that the traffic study does address the operations based on the layout of the street that will be developed. Associate Engineer Katrina Kunkel informed the Commission that the traffic study will account for peak hour traffic and that the infrastructure is designed to accommodate when there would be the most concentration of trucks.

Chair Allgower asked staff if the future residential component was included in the traffic study. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock noted that the traffic study assessment included the full build out construction plan.

Commissioner Beck asked staff what tenants/businesses would be occupying the warehouses. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock stated that the buildings speculative, but would let the applicant provide additional information.

Commissioner Chester asked staff if there would be any restriction that that city would impose on the Pumpkin Patch to restrict their current operations. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock informed the Commission that there are no current provisions that would restrict their operations.

Commissioner Higginson noted that he understands the streamlining and focus to protect the Pumpkin Patch. He stated that the Commission does not want to diminish their operation, and that the Pumpkin Patch is a vital business to the community.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 4
6-5-K23/2024 City Council Agenda 983

Terri Allen with Pacific Industrial introduced the rest of the Pacific Industrial staff in attendance with her.

Ms. Allen noted that there is no tenant at this time for either warehouse. Terri Allen thanked staff for the presentation and proceeded with a PowerPoint presentation.

Commissioner Vick stated that the Pacific Industrial plans were a good and well thought out project.

Commissioner Higginson complimented the project and location and appreciated the time put into this project by the applicant. Commissioner Higginson noted that the mix of uses has been apart of the original FCSP and that the update is a refining to the project.

PUBLIC COMMENT
The following members of the public spoke:
• Elijah Silva
• David Martinez
• Zach Strasters
• Hansen Wang
• John Sisley
• Timothy Slade
• Robert Lugan
• Eddie Campos
• Thomas Ruiz
• Tyler Rameson
Dan Floriani with Pacific Oaks noted that he appreciated all the comments. He stated that he loves the Pumpkin Patch and doesn't want to see it go anywhere. He appreciates the Commissions commitment to protect the Pumpkin Patch. Mr. Floriani noted that he is in full support of the Pumpkin Patch and would like to help their operation.

The Public HearinLy was then closed.

Commissioner Higginson stated that he appreciates the support, time and effort for the project and the presentations.

Commissioner Chester thanked staff for the presentation and expressed appreciation for all the hard work they do. She noted that the Pumpkin Patch has put the City of Yucaipa on the map and is very passionate about the Pumpkin Patch.

Commissioner Beck stated that he likes development, but has concerns about impacts coming from the warehouses.

Commissioner Vick noted that the million square foot warehouses have the lowest vacancy.

Commissioner Vick stated that he does not have a problem with the development, and he appreciates the proposal of the project.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 5
6-5DX3/2024 City Council Agenda 984

Commissioner Snodgrass stated that she is concerned about the future projects across the county line and how that will affect the city.

Chair Allgower noted that he does not agree with the zoning change for the Pumpkin Patch. He stated that the open space could be better utilized.

ACTION: MOTION TO CONTINUE THE ITEM TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING ON JULY 17, 2024, BY Commissioner Beck, SECOND BY Commissioner Vick, CARRIED, 5-1-0-0, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 1.

2. SUBJECT: STARLING HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN (CASE NO. 22-129/GPA/SP/TTM 20372): THE STARLING HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN PROVIDES THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A 14.78-ACRE SITE FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INCLUDES TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) 20372 TO FORMALLY CREATE A 127-UNIT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND ASSOCIATED

COMMUNITY FEATURES INCLUDING A RECREATION CENTER, ACTIVE PARK, DOG

PARK, ENTRY MONUMENTS, AND DETENTION BASINS BASED ON THE SPECIFIC PLAN. A MINOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT IS ALSO PROPOSED TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE SITE SHOWN ON GENERAL PLAN FIGURE CDL-2, LAND USE MAP, FROM RS-20M (SINGLE -RESIDENTIAL, 20,000 SQUARE FOOT

MINIMUM) TO PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT), AND A MODIFICATION TO GENERAL PLAN FIGURE, CDL-3, LAND USE MODIFICATIONS, TO ADD THE STARLING HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED AT THE NE CORNER OF 12TH STREET AND AVENUE E; APNS: 0318-021-18, 19, -44 & -58.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and pursuant to Sections 82.0101 and

83.020305 of the Yucaipa Development Code, provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding the Starling Heights Specific Plan (SHSP) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), as well as the associated Tract Map (TTM 20372).

Depending on the Planning Commission's review and recommendation, several potential motions can be made and are as follows:

Recommendation in support of the SHSP Update:

If the Planning Commission is in support of the SHSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-33, approving the Specific Plan for the proposed Starling Heights Specific Plan and the associated minor General Plan Amendment / Land Use District Change of a property from RS-20M Single Residential, 20,000 square foot minimum lot size) to the land use designation of PD (Planned Development); and
Planning Commission Minutes Page 6
6-SLt43/2024 City Council Agenda 985

2. Approve first reading, by the title only, as read by staff, of Ordinance No. 449, amending Ordinance No. 343, amending the Official Land Use Plan and Zoning Ordinance as adopted by the City of Yucaipa; and
Approve the Tentative Tract Map No. 20372 (Case No. 22-129/TTM 20372), subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in this Agenda Report; and

4. Adopt the Findings as contained in this Agenda Report; and

5. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, finding the mitigation measures and standard measures and procedures will reduce the potential level of environmental impact to less than significant; and

6. Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination; and,

7. Review, and if it is considered acceptable, approve the architectural design and conceptual landscaping for the proposed Project.

Recommendation against the SHSP:

If the Planning Commission is not in support of the SHSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:

1. Direct Staff to prepare a Resolution to deny the approval of the Starling Heights Specific Plan; and

2. Direct Staff to prepare Findings for denial, based on the Planning Commission's consideration of the Project with respect to Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code; and

3. Deny Tentative Tract Map 20372 (Case No. 22-129), as it is inconsistent with the land use designations of the existing Land Use District; and

4. Determine that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15270 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.

Alternatives:

The Planning Commission can make any additional recommendations to modify the SHSP that are deemed necessary to meet the Findings specified by Section 8 3.0203 10 of the Yucaipa Development Code, or that would better meet the Goals, Policies, and/or Objectives of the General Plan.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 7
6-54423/2024 City Council Agenda 986

DISCUSSION:

Assistant Planner Christian Farmer presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, William Rockwell, was in attendance via conference call. Mr. Rockwell thank the Commission and Assistant Planner Christian Farmer for his presentation. He noted that both the initial and current concern is density and he tried everything in his power to mitigate that.

Commissioner Beck asked the applicant for the average lot size. Mr. Rockwell informed the Commission that the average lot size is roughly 3,000 sq. ft.

PUBLIC COMMENT
The following members of the public spoke:
• Mike Simpson
• Jillian Simpson
• Brian Taylor
• Hansen Wang
Mr. Rockwell thanked all the public speakers for their comments and stated that they focused on affordability.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

Commissioner Higginson noted that applicant has done a good job with the variety of the aesthetics, and it is a creative use of the land.

Commissioner Chester noted ingress and egress concerns.

Commissioner Beck does not agree with the density of the project.

Commissioner Vick stated that he is tired of the higher -density projects and that these homes are not priced for starter families.

Commissioner Snodgrass expressed density concerns, noting that this project is in the wrong area, and that she also does not like the architectural design.

ACTION #1: MOTION TO APPROVE BY Commissioner Higginson, NOT CARRIED, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO.2.

ACTION #2: MOTION TO DENY THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AS IT IS

INCONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE PROJECT BY Commissioner Chester, SECOND BY Commissioner Snodgrass, CARRIED, 5-1-0-0, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO.2.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 8
6-502C3/2024 City Council Agenda 987

3. SUBJECT: CASE NO.24-046/GPA: CITY OF YUCAIPA GENERAL PLAN SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATE.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and provide a recommendation to the City Council to:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-09, adopting the Safety Element Update to the General Plan; and

2. Determine that the update to the Safety Element is within the scope of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared pursuant to the provisions of Section 15168 of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, for the City's General Plan; and

3. Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and

4. Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination.

DISCUSSION:

Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner presented the Agenda Report.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Chester, SECOND BY Commissioner Snodgrass, CARRIED, 6-0-0-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.

ANNOUNCEMENTS: Deputy Director /City Planner Benjamin Matlock noted that the next scheduled Planning Commission Meeting will be held in the middle of July since Chair Allgower will not be available, and we do not have a Vice Chair at this time.

ADJOURNMENT:

The meeting adjourned at 10:48 PM.

Benjamin Matlock
Deputy Director/City Planner
JR Allgower
Chair of the Planning Commission
Planning Commission Minutes
6_502/¢ 3/2024 City Council Agenda

Page 9 ends

988

ATTACHMENT 10
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 989

Agenda Item No.

City of Yucaipa

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of July 17, 2024
A Regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Yucaipa, California was called to order in the Council Chambers, 34272 Yucaipa Boulevard, Yucaipa, on July 17, 2024, at 6:30 PM.

PRESENT: J.R. Allgower, Chair
Stacey Chester, Commissioner
David Higginson, Commissioner
Donna Snodgrass, Commissioner
Lyle Vick, Commissioner
ABSENT: Richard Beck, Commissioner
CITY STAFF: Benjamin Matlock, Deputy Director of Community Development/City Planner Michael Reiter, Assistant City Attorney
Fermin Preciado, Director of Development Services / City Engineer Christian Farmer, Assistant Planner
Katie Syme, Development Services Technician
Maria Koolhoven, Planning Commission Assistant

CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 6:31 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Lyle Vick.

ROLL CALL
Commissioner Richard Beck had an excused absence.

SELECTION OF INTERIM VICE -CHAIR
A. ACTION: MOTION BY Chair Allgower, SECOND BY Commissioner Snodgrass TO SELECT STACEY CHESTER AS INTERIM VICE -CHAIR, MOTION CARRIED 5-0- 1-0.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 1
7_ 1 %M/2024 City Council Agenda 990

PUBLIC COMMENT:

The following members of the public spoke:
• Chris Venable
• Hansen Wang
• Dr. Newman

CONSENT AGENDA
The following Consent Agenda items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. The Planning Commission will act upon them, at one time, without discussion. Any Commissioner or staff member may request removal of an item from the Consent Agenda for discussion.

1. SUBJECT: APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 1, 2024.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Snodgrass, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 4-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 1. (INTERIM VICE -CHAIR CHESTER WAS NOT IN ATTENDANCE AT THE MAY 1, 2024, PC MEETING).

2. SUBJECT: APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 5, 2024.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Snodgrass, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 2. (WITH THE CORRECTION ON PAGE 8 OF COMMISSIONER CHESTER'S LAST NAME CORRECTED).

DISCUSSION ITEMS

3. SUBJECT: JOHN NEJAD (CASE NO. 23-109/DBA/CUP/ARC): A DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT TO ALLOW A 100 PERCENT INCREASE IN UNIT DENSITY ON A

RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PARCEL, AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 52-UNIT, AGE -RESTRICTED, SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT THAT INCLUDES TWO (2) ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADDS), THAT CONSISTS OF FOUR (4), TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

INCLUDING A CLUB HOUSE, BARBEQUE AREA, COMMUNITY GARDEN AND SITE LANDSCAPING AT 34567 WILDWOOD CANYON ROAD; APNS: 0319-191-19, -27, -28, -29, & -34.
(Continued from May 1, 2024)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission review the proposed colors, materials, and architectural design and, if acceptable, approve Case No. 23-109/PUP/ARC/DBA.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 2
7_1%W/2024 City Council Agenda 991

DISCUSSION:

Assistant Planner Christian Farmer presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, John Nejad, was in attendance, and stated that he was available to answer any questions the Commission may have.

Commissioner Snodgrass stated the project was 100 percent improved and thanked the applicant for the updates.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

The following members of the public spoke:
• Hansen Wang
ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Snodgrass, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO.3.

PUBLIC HEARINGS
The order of Business for the Public Hearing Shall Be:

4. SUBJECT: FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE (CASE NO.24-044/GPA/SPA) & PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM): THE EXISTING FREEWAY CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN (FCSP), ADOPTED IN NOVEMBER 2008, ALLOWS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 2,447 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 424.7 ACRES AND UP TO 4,585,779 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES ON 242.7 ACRES WITHIN THE 1,242- ACRE PLAN AREA. THE PROPOSED UPDATE TO THE FCSP (CASE NO. 24-044/GPA/SPA) WOULD RESULT IN A TOTAL OF 2,472 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 5,093,265 SQUARE FEET OF NONRESIDENTIAL USES. AS A RESULT, THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD RESULT IN AN INCREASE OF 25 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 2,786,461 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK (BP), AND A REDUCTION OF 2,278,976 SQUARE FEET OF REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) COMPARED TO THE EXISTING FCSP. THE PROPOSED PROJECT ALSO INCLUDES DEVELOPMENT OF THE PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER (21-196/CUP/ARC/TPM), WHICH CONSISTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO (2) BUILDINGS WITH WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE SPACES, TOTALING 2,054,000 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING SPACE, AS

WELL AS TRUCK PARKING AND DOCKING BAYS, CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS INCLUDED IN THE FCSP UPDATE.
(Continued for June 5. 2024)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and pursuant to Sections 82.0101 and 83.020305 of the Yucaipa Development Code, provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan (FCSP) and the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), as well as Case No. 21-196 for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center. If the Planning Commission is in support of the FCSP, the following recommendation to the Council is provided:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-19, approving the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update; certifying that the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); accepting the mitigation measures identified in the Final SEIR; adopting Findings of Fact; and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and
2) Approve first reading, by title only, as read by staff, of Ordinance No. 448, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Yucaipa, California, amending Ordinance No. 343, amending of the official land use plan and zoning ordinance of the City of Yucaipa; and 3) Approve the Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21-196), subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in the Agenda Report, and if acceptable, approve the Architectural Design and preliminary landscaping, for the Pacific Oaks Commerce Center Project (POCC); and 4) Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and 5) Approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and direct Staff to file a Notice of Determination.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 4
7-1103/2024 City Council Agenda 993

Based on the Commission's discussion at the prior Public Hearing, modifications to the FCSP have since been added to the Errata sheet that reflect the interests of the "Pumpkin Factory." Alternatives
The Planning Commission can make any additional recommendations to modify the FCSP Update that are deemed necessary to meet the Findings specified by Section 83.020310 of the Yucaipa Development Code, or that would better meet the Goals, Policies, and/or Objectives of the General Plan.

DISCUSSION:

Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock presented the Agenda Report.

Representatives from Pacific Industrial were in attendance but did not wish to make a presentation.

PUBLIC COMMENT
The following members of the public spoke:
• Tyler Rameson
• Edward Timmons
• Hansen Wang
• Bill Sellers
• Kathy Sellers
• Colleen Wang
• Kevin Miskin
The Public Hearine- was then closed.

The following ex parte communications were disclosed. Commissioner Vick noted that spoke with Craig Heaps and Ken Robinson regarding the project provisions on his property.

Commissioner Higginson asked for clarification on the infrastructure aspects of the project. Director of Development Services / City Engineer Fermin Preciado stated that both the FCSP Update and the Pacific Oaks Project both contain Conditions of Approval that were derived from various studies as part of the environmental review. All improvements are required to be completed prior to occupancy of the warehouse and the remaining infrastructure requirements for traffic and transportation are associated with the remaining development with the FCSP.

Commissioner Chester noted traffic concerns and asked if the traffic study considered the trucks that would be parked along the roads throughout the city and causing congestion. Director of Development Planning Commission Minutes Page 5
7-I%N3/2024 City Council Agenda 994

Services / City Engineer Fermin Preciado noted that the trip generation numbers were taken into consideration.

Commissioner Vick asked for clarification regarding the industrial and regional commercial zoning and what that would mean. Deputy Director of Community Development / City Planner Benjamin Matlock noted that that this would help protect against the freeway adjacent commercial pads from being warehouses but would allow regional commercial uses such as retail.

Commissioner Snodgrass asked for clarification on where the County line is and stated that she is concerned about the future projects in Calimesa that may affect the city.

ACTION: MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE ITEM FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE ERRATA SHEET EXCEPT FOR ITEM #13, BY Chair Allgower, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, NOT CARRIED, 2-3-1-0, (INTERIM

VICE CHAIR CHESTER, COMMISSIONER SNODGRASS, AND COMMISSIONER VICK VOTED NO) FOR AGENDA ITEM NO. 4:

5. SUBJECT: APT TOWERS (CASE NO. 24-011 /CUP); A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE REVIEW OF A 75-FOOT-TALL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY DESIGNED AS A EUCALYPTUS TREE, WITH A 200 SQUARE FOOT LEASE AREA FOR THE

ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT WHICH WILL BE SURROUNDED BY AN EIGHT -FOOT -TALL BLOCK WALL LOCATED AT 12954 BRYANT STREET, APN 0319-172-08.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and; A) Review the design and location of the proposed telecommunications facility, and if it is acceptable, approve Conditional Use Permit No. 24-011, subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in the Agenda Report; and
B) Adopt the Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and C) Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section 15303 (Class 3); and D) Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

DISCUSSION:

Commissioner Vick recused himself from the agenda item due to proximity to the site.

Assistant Planner Christian Farmer presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, David Elliott, was in attendance and available to answer any questions the Commissioners may have.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 6
7-14VN012024 City Council Agenda 995

Commissioner Higginson asked the applicant to explain the safety aspects regarding the cell tower. The applicant, David Elliott, noted that all cell towers are regulated by the FCC and every antenna is very strictly monitored and maintained. Commissioner Snodgrass noted that the EF radiation from the tower has no impact to those below.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearinlz was then closed.

ACTION #1: MOTION TO APPROVE BY Commissioner Snodgrass, WITH THE

CONDITIONS TO HAVE A SHIELDED CABLE AND EMF SHIELDING PAINT INSIDE THE ELECTRICAL VAULT, NOT CARRIED, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO.5.

ACTION #2: MOTION BY Interim Vice Chair Chester, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 4-0-1-1, FOR AGENDA ITEM NO.5.

6. SUBJECT: ROBERT AND VIOLA CRABB (CASE NO. 24-032/SUP/ARC): A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 1,890 SQUARE FOOT AND 17-FOOT-

TALL STEEL RV CARPORT PROPOSED ON A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 36320 WOODBRIAR STREET; APN: 1242-451-08.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and:

A) Review the architectural design of the proposed metal structure, and if it is acceptable, approve the design subject to the Conditions of Approval; and
B) Adopt the Special Use Permit Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and C) Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section 15303 (Class 3); and D) Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

DISCUSSION:

Development Services Technician Katie Syme presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, Robert Crabb, was in attendance and stated that he just needs to cover up his motorhome and thanked the Commission for their time.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 7
7- 1 -hT43/2024 City Council Agenda 996

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Vick, SECOND BY Interim Vice -Chair Chester, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO.6.

7. SUBJECT: MIKE HAMMER (CASE NO.24-048/SUP/ARC): A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 17.25-FOOT-TALL AND 1,200 SQUARE FOOT STEEL ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ON A SINGLE -RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12728 DOUGLAS STREET; APN: 0322-103-27.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and:

DISCUSSION:

Development Services Technician Katie Syme presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, Mike Hammer, was in attendance and stated that he would like to store his tools and trailers.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Higginson, SECOND BY Interim Vice -Chair Chester, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 7.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 8
7-1IL91 3/2024 City Council Agenda 997

8. SUBJECT: SHAUN BORDEN (CASE NO. 24-063/PUP/MNV): A PLANNING USE PERMIT TO REAUTHORIZE AN EXPIRED USE PERMIT FOR CASE NO. 17-012, WHICH CONSISTS OF ADDING THIRTEEN (13) SINGLE -STORY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ARRANGED AS DUPLEXES TO A 1.85 ACRE PROPERTY THAT FEATURES AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, LOCATED 34757 AVENUE H, EAST OF THE CORNER OF AVENUE H AND 3RD STREET,

AND A MINOR VARIANCE FOR A REDUCTION OF THE REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW FOR A 10 FOOT, 6 INCH SETBACK IN LIEU OF A 15 FOOT SETBACK.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing, and:

A) Approve Planning Use Permit No. 24-063 subject to the Conditions of Approval as contained in this Agenda Report; and
B) And then close the public hearing, and then Planning Commission review the proposed architecture and conceptual landscape design, and if it is acceptable, approve the design C) Adopt the Findings as contained in this Agenda Report; and D) Adopt the Minor Variance Findings as contained in the Agenda Report; and E) Adopt a Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15305 (Class 5) and 15332 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and F) Direct Staff to file a Notice of Exemption.

DISCUSSION:

Assistant Planner Christian Farmer presented the Agenda Report.

The applicant, Bryce Borden, was in attendance and stated Assistant Planner Christian Farmer covered the project in his presentation.

PUBLIC COMMENT
No public comment speaker slips were received for this item.

The Public Hearing was then closed.

ACTION: MOTION BY Commissioner Vick, SECOND BY Commissioner Higginson, CARRIED, 5-0-1-0, TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NO. 8.

Planning Commission Minutes Page 9
7-1qVN0/2024 City Council Agenda 998

ANNOUNCEMENTS: Deputy Director /City Planner Benjamin Matlock thanked all in attendance. Mr.

Matlock thanked the Commissioners for their input on the FCSP that will be included as part of the information presented to the City Council.

ADJOURNMENT:

The meeting adjourned at 8:22 PM.

Benjamin Matlock
Deputy Director/City Planner
JR Allgower
Chair of the Planning Commission
Planning Commission Minutes
7-11092213/2024 City Council Agenda

Page 10 ends

999

Attachment 11
Draft Environmental Impact Report (under separate cover) EIR Link: FCSP Draft SEIR
Appendices accessible here: City's Environmental Review Page Attachment 1
Final Environmental Impact Report (under separate cover) FSEIR Link: FCSP Final SEIR
Attachment 13
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (under separate cover) MMRP Link: FCSP MMRP
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1000

ATTACHMENT 14
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1001

AOL
a�
OD �
I-
° BUILDING 1
ED
JD
ED 00
-- _ - _C)"
(D 0 ioc)e C) cp 0 (D (D E)
ED
(D C)/
a
i

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA
8841 RESEARCH DR
SUITE 200
IRVINE • CA 92618
949.387.1323
RIDGELA.CCIM

PACIFIC OAKS

COMMERCE CENTER
0 60 120 240 360
9/13/2023 SCHEMATIC DESIGN
1/14/2022 SCHEMATIC DESIGN
11/17/2021 DRAFT SCHEMATIC DESIGN

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-2A2-1
DRAWN BY:

RLA
CHK'D BY:

RLA
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
SHEET TITLE:

Ll
�00
09/23/2024 City Council Jenda
J:\Dwgs\RGA\Pacic Oaks\1-SD\po-plp.dwg, 9/13/2023 3:34:15 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 1002

j
J
ARCHITECT:

NFW I nT I INF
16uPP
Sta
N
y
Y
APPLICANT:PACIFIA L C PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

I N D U T R

YUCAIPA, CA
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
°'"" SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN

PROJECT INFORMATION
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.

PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE:

D MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:

D CONSTRUCTION TYPE:

D USE:

CT DATA
0301-201-40, 41, 42
0301-211-10, 12
0301-221-10
0301-201-26
0301-191-21
B-P
62'
III-B
S-1
(WAREHOUSE / LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
BUILDING 1
BUILDING 2
TOTAL
2,625,382 SF
2,838,221 SF
5,463, 603 SF

60.270 AC

65.157 AC
125.427 AC
AREA 1,052,500 SF
1,001,500 S F
2,054,000 SF
i E 40.09%

35.29%

37.59%

AREA BY USE
E
20, 000 S F
20,000 S F
40,000 SF
-HOUSE
1,032,500 SF
981,500 SF
2,014,000 SF
EKING
) PARKING
;E
80 80
160
0 SF
_
:HOUSE
1,033
982
2,014 _
)00 SF
QUIRED
1,113
1,062
2,174

PROVIDED
_

DARD STALLS
453
418
870 _
STALLS
11 10
21 'ALLS
52 48
_
99 _
,OVI D ED
515
475
990
IRED 4 4 8
'I D ED 178 178 356
'ARKING
'I D ED 410 326 736
SD 1/14/22 2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SD 11/19/21 PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
SCALE: 1" = 120'-0"
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-A1-1P
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
Al
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda
1003

ARCHITECT:
/ N
- - - - - - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - NEW LOT LINE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- 8'H-TUBESTEEL FENCE--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- `y
' LO 8'H TUBE ,
8'H TUBE STEEL FENCE
--------------------------------------------J 12'X55'TRAILERSTALLS ' ' i STEEL FENCE
LO
I N
Lu Lu

O Q Q LO
CD CD
T
T
I M co
/ O O
co co
N N '
I T
,
,
27 40,
22' 40' 57.4'
26' 26' 12' 12, 26' 26'
,
IMP,
z CD
z_
, J
LU
/ o
co 178 DO K PO ITIO S F
ol 5 15 AUTO STALLS
/ 6'H TRASH111-113

ENCLOSURE IESFR SPRIN LERS '
MAX. HEIGHT: 62 FT. '
/ 50,
M
� I
® I
® I I
/77
r
r ® I — — — , r — — —
OFF
/ — — — — co
co
KL�_
--- --- i
co
_ N co co
T
LLJ
LLJ
co
\ — — LO 6' '
\ _ _
L_____________________________ 12'X55'TRAILER STALLS-
LO
- /
' co 8'H TUBE STEEL FENCE
.............................................. *
.........

I. SECONDARY
FIRE ACCESS I ��

DRIVE (SEE CIVIL)
SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"
APPLICANT: PACIFIC PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

I N D U S T R I A L
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

YUCAIPA, CA
SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN - BUILDING 1
SD 1/14/22 2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SD 11/19/21 PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-A1-lP
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
Al -1-i
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda
1004

ARCHITECT:
� 1
C.

I
BUILDING 1
SEE SHT. Al-1
I/ � / 5p ►
01 26,
25 I 1
I / /
6'H TRASH
ENCLOSURE `
/ / 3
i a ,
I / /
I
\
\OFF -= -
n3
INV
IN
-------- - I -I -
I
jp
rO
gyp`
Vt
/ 5p ,
S �
`a NIS6p' `
q i �?
s �-A
55 L N 2
J5 17$__0 CK PaSfT]b N S
CAP
55 \26 TRAILER STALLS;
5 W TO STALLS
CONST. TYPE 11I'-B _
�o SF PRINKLERRS
a
U X. H IGHT' F.lk
l
,
,
,I X
,
,
,
O-\AFAN
APPLICANT:
i
I F I

I N D U S T R I A L
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

SCHEMATIC

YUCAIPA, CA

SITE PLAN
BUILDING 2
,
,
,
,
,
,
SD 1/14/22 2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SD 11/19/21 PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
SCALE: 1" = 100'-0"
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-A1-1P
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
Al
-2-1
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda
1005

ARCHITECT:

I r_A7l Qn
Q
CD
Cfl
Lid
Cfl
C9
LS7
c�
co
co
c�
C0
CV
EO
N
ti
ti
CXi
N
E0
CIOo
N
N
N
L J
o\i
N
C)o
C�
0 CIO
N
�LL� EO
r N
L J
N
En
BU
LDING 1
2750 SF
CUPANCY -1
110
O
o
c
N
ES
MAX.

R SPRINKLERS
HEIGHT: 62 FT.
o
N
ti
ti
EO
N
80 N
M
CYO
O7
c�
co
O7
Ln
E01i
`o
OFFICE
OFFICE ~ ENTRY
Ln
~
MAIN
ENTRY
RY ;
� � � � � � � �
�
Q'
E)o
�
5 48'
12'
119,
1,176'
119'
12'
48' 5
1, 544'
APPLICANT:

I N D U S
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

IFI PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

T R I A L

YUCAIPA, CA
SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING 1
SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" 0' 50' 100' 200' 5(
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-1A2-1
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
A2-1 - 1-i
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda
1006

ARCHITECT:
1 476'
=
LO
CIco -A
O
CIEO
co
O
SCALE: 1" 50'-0" 0' 10' 20' 50' 100'
5' 48' 12' 65' 1,346'
a
<
. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
�
c�
co
I I
_MAIN

I ENTRY,
I I
—
OFFICE
o�
c�
m
N
ti
N

PACIFIC PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE CENTER

YUCAIPA, CA
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
`""` SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLAN -BUILDING 2A2-1 -2-1
RGA PROJECT N0:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-1A2-1
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHK'D BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda r
100/

09i
b-10
LAND USE. N
orERs-r

VICINITY MAP
GENERAL COMMERCIAL / \
>.

A
T
C,
E
}"/G
H00 Ffty Z_"
/A -W5
SITS
LAND USE:
' MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL
CO
Lhx�Ri1. // LAND USE: �� 7��// _�/� J /��ll
/ GENERAL COMMERCIAL \ `_ /� / / / ` - - - - \ - _ \\ \ \ 1 \ Il�ll \ `./ I�
.. EXISTING BUILDING � \� . - ` �I I / / - - -I\\\��
115 LF FROM PIL L65 �/� �� II� \ ___`J� U J 1 \ 1 \) \ \ \ \ \ 7 1 N, u,
gll
0 - - -- - -- �_ �/
VICINITY MAP - = _jS
/ .�9� ( _-L7 L79- � �,�✓/ _r- .1� ��+++ + ++ /�I\J\� PARCEL 4 NORTH _ \ O \ \\ -_` OPEN SPACE
NTS EXISTING BUILDING �a C (� \ 8 '� 31 -_ J _ +�+ +-\ \\\+ - "c � / 12 LF FROM PL \ \ �\\\\ i �' - -- -�' -\\\\� + + \ \ / ) )`,� \�\_ \ - �� - \ + \ \�� `34� / lq'C33.,C32�: 6 5 +50= 1 + + + / +` J / � `� I (�� L12 . ((; \ \ �, 5p + + + +\\ \�\\�\ . L7s L7 --- / 8 f 2 `L -22 + } r �� + l /� 1 / V lI`l i�\\ -\�- '\ \ G L� �+ � � \ ---- nn-rnjam\ + �+ 00 � + + +�+ J, \�, / ) / ``\ \ . - LAND USE.
/+� � �'2088j�� _ '` �-?-- � 0� / / � _� 1,-�� + / ) � � - \ , \l \ / EXISTING SITE �� \ ! �\
/,� f / / \\\\ )\ I� \l \\\ s\ SINGLE FAMILY
-- "^ t ,.�(lC�� \ �-
_ _ OPEN SPACE \
L14 _ - �Ti + �s + +�+� + \\ � � + + + \ \�",�-=2135��: + I + + /+ + +�+ �2175�,. �---=�� i+ + +��} � � � ��2�''�-1 \ 2125 11 \ \\ %_ ,
=2 ------ - -----------------------------� , ,i >> \�))) P L15 \� - 18 _ -L84 ---- - - 22
0+ ' \ \ \ 2 00 -_- ----- / �N/ 11(l(�L\ �\�� \ /��/PUBLIC ROAD FUTURE _ 'j+��i \\ \ r -\�`\\\oil \\l +� - - F1 8 TYP. /+ \\` \ C �� = i (i- �+ +++ r + .'4+++-\ -2225+ \ \\\ \ _ o + ( /-,\�\\� =\l\ JJ/ �� ALIGNMENT PENDING- J+ r� T / + + + + p - IINIII1IIII I �• ��\C \^l r/
-� ,i% �� _ \ \ �11 �� o o I i \ I = 01 O \ --) ll �1\� % \\\�,�f�i- /' CITY COORDINATION` L13 / + + ` - - / / � 2250 �� o. W 0 ' �\ I \\C \ \\� _ / I

LINE TABLE

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING
L2
1618.24
S22°24'56.59"E
L22
303.09
N63°01'34.95"W
L3
371.76
N64°02'30.92"E
L23
368.97
N72°07'55.67"W
L4
361.98
N8*48'13.13"E
L24
334.90
N52°58'04.82"W
L5
257.77
N35°22'28.42"W
L25
525.03
N70°00'12.53"W
L6
1012.73
N3°50'09.39"E
L26
350.71
N87°27'54.84"E
L7

56.22 N44°50'31.72"W
L27
2012.34
S77°21'21.90"E
L8
125.37
S82°33'51.28"W
L28
368.04
S8°46'49.84"W
L9

38.11 S73°56'36.95"W
L29
214.33
S35°22'28.42"E
L10
207.02
S47°27'22.55"W
L30
519.77
N87°57'01.30"W
L11
274.27
S64°53'25.55"W
L31
1319.19
S78°53'41.70"W
L12

62.74 S69°54'18.60"W
L32
142.48
S31 °53'22.87"W
L13

42.15 S76°33'04.60"W
L33
167.36
S48°18'54.62"W
L14

38.75 N88°26'47.40"W
L34
215.47
N22°16'56.86"W
L15

16.58 N66°3909.40W
L35

95.25 N60°52'07.49"W
L16
154.61
S34°09 54.bU W
L36
112.23
S60°01' 5b.b,5 W
L17

32.78 S64°56'08.74"E
L37
154.18
N77°46'00.00"W
L18
350.71
N87°27'54.84"E
L38

54.89 N1 °06'23.94"W
L19
260.58
N84°28'37.51 "E
L39

85.90 N26°30'43.06"E
L20

58.87 N73°49'10.72"W
L40
421.03
N47°51'17.94"W
L21

82.34 S60°01'13.33"W
L41
203.72
N44°20'38.56"W
J/ c21+� + + �+��=_= l ��>>� 1 _
\+\ l�/� / \\\\ 5 I _ J�J 1/-z + + 11 /I IIII F1 - -\
Ji � ti n r 11 I -
/+�+�+ + + + �v, PARCEL 2 + v+� �-/ i ,��:� �,�� _z2��205��Jy�//J �+ ++ I� D5 ++++ -++ ++ p�� v -
/ + + - + + + + + �� + FUTURE RESIDENTIAL \ (\ J+ ( (�� 4p• O V' . " A - - II / I W2 FUTURE RESIDENTIAL + + + + + + rt rt rt � - art, -� � rt ,� + ,� - � \ / +, +++ +�/+ + ++��-+ + I((J� N 1 PARCEL3 \1111LL,+ ++ �,rtf �`/ +/ /�\ `// - D2 q4( Ls 2 �__ WAREHOUSE L \ 2 / /l I / i -o\
LAND USE: /'us, \� + ; \` / ///l / �. \�� // =40.0 + + "` -� i �-_ + + FUTURE ROAD ACCESS_ -�jj / ��2155/>+f+ \\+ + �- -- `� - /�'� 1\+ // SINGLE RESIDENTIAL y , 2 �� ;-� �// �.�� = � �� / +r+\� �_��_+ ;+-+_- � / � +� l�\��\ �--� 9 / (NOT A PART OF PROJECT - ROAD - ��\ ` ti + 1 �% / / \ 1 / / ++/+ + + -+�/+ \-* BUILDING 1 � + +�ll� \� \�� r r ' + + + + /r l+ �� - 1 052 500 SF / /+- + \\\�\\\"�C�+
(( DESIGN SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING ¢,� + /// �� / + + R20 cv; TRASH ENCLOSURE 2 178 DOCK POSITIONS - / /�/ - J S� // ./ + / / \ 2 F1 2 TYP. (I+\Y=
/� + +, �� UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WITH + \„( / �=2250 \+�/ + + +TYP.) , S ( J I �, - D7 II f .2225 + -,�Jll ^\ 410 TRAILER STALLS \ C� 2' D7 / �O + + _ FURTHER CITY APPROVAL REQUIRED.) �I _ + �\ ;� + 2 TYP. F1 \ - J ��1'1 - //%\\\' - \ ,n o_�))+� �S + + T - + \\ , �2 ��\ ��, W1 W4 ////��, / /(�`�lL\ \�� 515 AUTO STALLS �) \ o N I)J} + +�+\✓ ,/T F�05. �\ + /� + %% = II(\1\ �- '� \� _ = ) J N'N+� / + + + D1 + F1 7�y . 2200�-_�_` l�-ter.°) \�� SPRINKLER - (/�� cvtN,� �, >>\ C25 + L17+' + + + + + +\ $ C24 +� /�� C29 + + z.. + / _ \ )/J/ / //�\\l > r^ N (I 1 + - F1 - T`iP •� i I \ \ ( I + \ + + + + + + +.L19✓ D7 / + + + + 21�5\ + + - + +�+ + , \, �//�\J��\\�/, f/�' / MAX HEIGHT 62 FT/\\�I / \ �I r*I� ; \\ + D1 + + + + + +- - 0 1 + D1 - + + + + +,'' 0`_�- W3 W1 W4 " ` �g0 CONSTRUCTION TYPE III-B �J%///��11�-'� S3 \ 20 \ + / TRASH ENCLOSURE y -- - ' - • +-_ � S1 - � � /�2 �✓r-= _ v vJ''��/� �� P•� / -' _ + + ++-
\ y / ' I\ 1 .° - I � \S2 205
+ \ / �i- O_ - - - \� �� W\ W +/ S1 /+ LAND USE:

C2® -L26- _ - - �=2100 - 11 - �� / r i :) \ S3 ///// 'L`L/ - - - \� \ \ 1 ` II �� \ H W3111 \l 1 +� D7 \\� 1 -� D3 �;2
\ > _ _ - F1 _ _ 25 �` ` / r ..0 _ - S1 D7 5 W4 OPEN SPACE ✓ EXISTING BUILDING -' �-
78 LF FROM PL _-- 1 A F1 _ 21
� � - -% � � � , PROPOSED
Ro. %/'�� ////ti % !_-- _75 \\ F1 L ��1\111,,` W o
� PARCEL 5 PUBLIC ROAD �� -Z��\ -215p�. O D7 cgs 13 ' o.

EXISTING OPEN SPACE 'S - S1 / I I
_ _ - a\� �� / N 12/ / / �8 / 4 TYP.

OPEN SPACE j� '_ _ �.'_ _ /ice '/\�/��f 1� L44 D7 \�� `'. D7 ----- 11 S3 D4 i F1 7 D ��/\�� \ =+ S1 D2 \ - _ \�\ \
"- ------------------:

OPEN SPACE / 1===-= __---- L\L _ -\\
L36 _ _L 0-i^ �\ �l11 (/( i� \�/1\� 1\�� \`:. \ \� )
D7
+ +
( \ � . 721� /� I) I (((_ �/
,, ?j ll %5 = `
\ � D7 \ \
W2
�� 1 L35 � �\\\ii , o-�w� i// ��V��•�� JII�/� � � \ / // �Z Z a�� - 1 l) -� 2?0, lll((�.\�(C I 1 I II �\.,•.,1 + t \ ��//JJ / 1 \ / 0• - 178 DOCK POSITIONS 1
f'( /per 326 TRAILER STALLS
W1
471 AUTO STALLS \ a \

SPRINKLER
Jr�\ 2180; a
MAX HEIGHT 62 FT
/`� F1 7+TYP.\\
� CONSTRUCTION TYPE III-B \ \ I
\ + \ I;`-
\ .$
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

GOVERNMENT LOTS 3 AND 4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, IN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, AND LOTS 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 AND 9 OF BLOCK 79 OF RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 7, PAGE 2 OF MAPS, IN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 7, 8 AND 9 OF SAID BLOCK 79 OF RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO WHICH LIES NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF U.S. INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 10 AS SAID SOUTHERLY LINE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY DEEDS RECORDED JUNE 03, 1949 IN BOOK 2412, PAGE 156, RECORDED IN BOOK 3730, PAGE 306, AND RECORDED APRIL 19, 1962 IN BOOK 5684, PAGE 977, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY.

ALSO EXCEPTING THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 4, 5 AND 7 OF SAID BLOCK 79 WHICH LIES WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF LIVE OAK CANYON ROAD AS ESTABLISHED JULY 1950 BY THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SURVEYOR.

ALSO EXCEPTING FROM LOT 7 IN SAID BLOCK 79 THAT PORTION OF LIVE OAK CANYON ROAD AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO BY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 09, 1984 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 84-269725 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ALSO EXCEPTING FROM LOTS 4 AND 5 OF SAID BLOCK 79 THOSE PORTIONS WHICH LIE SOUTH AND WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:

COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 79, OF SAID RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, WHICH IS NORTH 89°54'15" EAST 1618.66 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SAID LINE WITH THE LINE BETWEEN SECTIONS 8 AND 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN

BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO GOVERNMENT SURVEY, SAID POINT BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND CONVEYED BY H. S. POWERS TO BREEDING FARM AND HATCHERY COMPANY, BY DEED DATED JUNE 05, 1950 AND RECORDED IN BOOK 2589, PAGE 552 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LAND, NORTH 27°56'45" WEST 1076.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85°58'45" WEST 666.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°51'15" EAST 252.22 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82°5345" WEST 293.90 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO MARSHALL G. RICHARDSON, ET UX., BY DEED FROM HERSCHEL S. POWERS AND WIFE, DATED JANUARY 08, 1954 AND RECORDED JANUARY 25, 1954 IN BOOK 3316, PAGE 18 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, NORTH 25°49' EAST, 90.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44°09' WEST 160.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02°20' WEST 138.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23°20' EAST 111.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°20' WEST 581 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE CENTER LINE OF LIVE OAK CANYON ROAD.

ALSO EXCEPTING FROM LOTS 2 AND 9 OF SAID BLOCK 79 OF RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO AND GOVERNMENT LOT 3 OF SECTION 10 THOSE PORTIONS LYING EASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:

BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 3, BEARING SOUTH 89°38'45" WEST, 1084.31 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 10°38'43" WEST, 272.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°54'32" EAST, 749.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 26°07'02" WEST, 443.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 80°38'14" WEST, 188.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 21 °58'28" WEST, 1112.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 °02'30" EAST, 648.68 FEET; THENCE NORTH 38°38'03" WEST, 407.10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 03°23'58" WEST, 541.62 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID U.S. INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 10.

ALSO EXCEPTING FROM LOTS 2, 3 AND 4 OF SAID BLOCK 79 OF RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO ANDGOVERNMENT LOT 4 OF SECTION 10 THOSE PORTIONS DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 9-TP-1 IN EXHIBIT "A", AS CONDEMNED BY THE YUCAIPA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, IN THAT "ORDER CORRECTING ERRORS AND AMENDING JUDGMENT", RECORDED MAY 28, 1992 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 92-224083 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (NOTE: SAID ORDER AMENDED THAT FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED MAY 15, 1981 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 81-107293 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.)
ALSO EXCEPTING FROM LOTS 4 AND 5 OF SAID BLOCK 79 THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND LYING WITHIN AN 88 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO BY GRANT DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 09, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-426315 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM A PORTION OF SAID LOT 7 OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND WHICH WAS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO IN DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 09, 1984 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 84-269725 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ALSO EXCEPTING THOSE PORTIONS CONDEMNED IN FEE, IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, BY FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION, CASE NO.

SCVSS146785, A CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF BEING RECORDED JANUARY 19, 2012 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 21483, AND RECORDED OCTOBER 01, 2013 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 427523, AND BY AMENDED FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED JUNE 01, 2018 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2018-0199960, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE YUCAIPA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC AGENCY OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 09, 2014 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 125397 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION OF SAID LAND LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF PARCEL MAP NO. 19967, IN THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 251 PAGES 33 THROUGH 36, INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

APN: 0301-201-40, -41 & -42, 0301-211-10 & -12, 0301-221-10, 0301-201-26, 0301-191-21 UTILITY COMPANIES �� v,.,• ++++� +��?� v �,5-/�v��ov,, ,, PARCEL 6 \\ ° ��.\\ `O, ( PARKING
TELEPHONE AT&T C'� + ++ ++ \� 2�20�/� °�.1 ��\ (SEE PARCEL DESCRIPTION NOTE) (844) 723 - 0252 NN�

ELECTRIC

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
(800) 655-4555
SEWER

YUCAIPA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
12770 2ND ST
YUCAIPA, CA 92399
(909) 797-5117
WATER

YUCAIPA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
12770 2ND ST
YUCAIPA, CA 92399
(909) 797-5117

STORM SEWER

YUCAIPA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
12770 2ND ST
YUCAIPA, CA 92399
(909) 797-5117
GAS

SOCAL GAS
(909) 307-7070
LEGEND
- - PROPERTY LINE
- - - - - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE
2166 PROPOSED CONTOUR
-2166- - EXISTING CONTOUR

TERRIS DRAIN

PAVEMENT
+ HYDROSEED
. .. ....... . . .. LANDSCAPING

UTILITY LEGEND

W PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER LINE

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE

IR PROPOSED IRRIGATION LINE

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE
F*- PROPOSED FIRE WATER LINE

PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT
- U(\v

PUBLIC ROAD NOTE

PUBLIC ROAD FUTURE ALIGNMENT
PENDING CITY COORDINATION.

PUBLIC STREET LENGTH 6,801'.

EXISTING STRUCTURES

ALL EXISTING BEEHIVES ENCOUNTERED
TO BE REMOVED PROPERLY.

STRUCTURES
NO EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN 30' OF PROJECT PROPERTY

NO EXISTING STRUCTURES ON PROJECT SITE

FIRE WATER NOTES
F1 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT.

DOMESTIC WATER
W1 INSTALL BACKFLOW IN CAGE.

W2 INSTALL 12" DOMESTIC WATER PIPE.

W3 BUILDING POINT OF CONNECTION.

E4 INSTALL DOMESTIC WATER METER.

W5 WATER MAIN LINE TO BE BORED UNDER HIGHWAY.

SANITARY SEWER
S1 INSTALL SEWER LATERAL.

S2 CONNECT TO EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
S3 BUILDING POINT OF CONNECTION.

STORM DRAIN
D1 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN.

D2 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPELINE.

D3 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LATERAL.

D4 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN DETENTION SYSTEM.

D5 PROPOSED DEBRIS BASIN.

D6 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN OUTLET STRUCTURE.

D7 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE.

IRRIGATION WATER
11 TIE INTO PROPOSED WATER LINE.
12 INSTALL 3" DOMESTIC WATER METER.
13 INSTALL 3" BACKFLOW IN CAGE.

L23\ o + + 2175�
\\ +\ ,+
+ + + L20�
F1 6 TYP.

O > C,4 �\
O _ cJ c- fly__
PARCEL 7 �-A �C-4 Av/<
W2 WAREHOUSE(-112230)
EXISTING SITE \\ ?205�\` J ' /
U OPEN SPACE \\ ///(a \ /w+ / j ( )),t I
/ I
\N1
i'/ F1
=0--12mww
III
LA
IIII

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING
L62

64.46 N51°52'49.75"E
L63
109.34
S71 °34'36.44"E
L64
536.49
N20°26'39.08"E
L65
398.95
N81 °26'01.41 "E
L66
306.17
N63°38'52.41 "E
L67
295.93
N53°06'00.41"E
L68
199.18
S65°52'36.59"E
L69
113.54
S73°12'16.18"E
L71

58.08 N52°45'20.14"E
L74

71.28 N74°27'01.64"E
L75

78.72 N83°10'42.57"E
L76
125.30
S87°29'34.72"E
L78
214.92
S52°15'03.88"E
L79
305.73
N80°06'25.28"E
L80
300.75
N74°40'11.28"E
L82
935.43
S12°38'37.99"W
L83
230.18
S61 *10'25.81 "W
L84
1861.38
N90°00'00.00"W
L85
1097.20
NO°00 00.00 E
L86
674.74
N77°21'21.90"W

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING
L88
161.12
S64°02'30.92"W
L90
798.53
S50°23'48.15"W
L92
294.43
S76°22'48.54"W
L93
264.74
N76°22'48.54"E
L95
798.53
N50°23'48.15"E
PARCEL DESCRIPTION ��r L52
PARCEL 1 = 29.53 AC. (GROSS)
PARCEL 2 = 32.04 AC. (GROSS)
PARCEL 3 = 60.27 AC. (GROSS) PROJECT DATA
PARCEL 4 = 65.82 AC. (GROSS) , BUILDING 1 BUILDING 2 I TOTAL PARCEL 5 = 30.04 AC. (GROSS)
PARCEL 6* = 29.68 AC. (GROSS) SITE AREA 2,625,332 SF 2,83$221 SF7 5,463,603 SF PARCEL 7 = 65.53 AC. (GROSS) E. 60-270 AC 85.15T AC i_ IZ5-427 AC TOTAL AREA = 312.91 AC. (GROSS)
*CONDITIONED TO REQUIRE PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS IF UTILIZED BY BUILDING 2 (PARCEL 7) BUILDING AREA U-52,500 SF 1,001,500 SF 2,054,000 SF BUILDING SETBACKS -i-
PROPOSED: IB ZONE COVERAGE 4 - '� 35.291A 37-SO°'a
FRONT SETBACK: 15' BUILDING AREA BY USE
REAR AND SIDE SETBACK: 10' -
OFFICE _j 20.000 SF 20,000 SIF j_ 40,0W SIF
ACCESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS WAREHOUSE 1 1.C32.5M SF 981,500 SF 2,014.000 SF 0301-201-40, -41 & -42, 031-211-10 & -12, 4__
0301-201-26, 0301-191-21 AUTO PARKING
REDUIRED PARKING.

PROPOSED SITE BREAKDOWN OFFICE $) 80 160„
11250SF
LANDSCAPE: 68%
PAVED: 17% WAREHOUSE 1,s33 982 ; 2,014
BUILDING: 15% 1 / 1.CWSF
EXISTING EASEMENTS TOTAL REQUIRED 1.113 1,D62 : 174
PARKING PRDVIDED I _
12 SLOPE EASEMENT TO YUCAIPA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT PER STANDARD STALLS 452 413 866 RECORDING NO. 81-107293 ADA STALLS 11 10 �#
16 SLOPE EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PER EV STALLS 48 '99 RECORDING NO. 89-426317 TOTAL PROVIDED #5 471 986
23 ACCESS EASEMENT PER RECORDING NO. 2018-0448807

DOCK LOADING ZONES
LAND USE REQUIRED A .4 a
PROVIDED 1E7 I
EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT
PROPOSED LAND USE: WAREHOUSE / FUTURE RESIDENTIAL TRAILER PARKING (,FnIp:RLkI PI ,&nl I DnII'•1 I IMF PROVIDED 10 . J,
EXISTING LAND USE: OPEN SPACE / SINGLE RESIDENTIAL / MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED LAND USE: OPEN SPACE / BUSINESS PARK / MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL

LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH

BEARING
L42
243.47
S74°34'36.16"W
L43
253.05
N58°03'07.45"W
L44
244.36
N32°57'02.11 "W
L45
236.40
S5°00'51.71 "E
L46
138.45
S81 °03'20.06"W
L47
238.30
N54°03'24.96"W
L48
128.04
N84°45'02.66"W
L49
751.86
N36°48'05.29"W
L50
240.27
N73°49'10.72"W
L51
329.91
N17*50'16.43"W
L52
564.77
S89°12'16.54"W
L53
272.54
S11 °0511.46"E
L54
749.13
S47°28'03.54"W
L55
443.81
S26°33'30.46"E
L56
188.56
S81 °04'42.46"E
L57
1112.94
S22°24'56.46"E
L58
439.21
S10°36'01.54"W
L59
407.10
S39°04'31.46"E
L60
541.88
S3°50'26.46"E
L61
971.07
S76°23'22.40"E

CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
DELTA
C34
428.81'
119.88'
119.49'
16°01'03"
C33

65.37'

49.55'

48.37'
43°25'48"
C32

67.61'

67.54'

64.77'
57*14'07"
C37
533.00'
241.71
239.65
25°5900"
C36
467.00'
111.22'
110.96'
13°38'43"
C31

88.52'

78.80'

76.22'
51 *00'18"
C35
967.00
651.50'
639.25'
38*36'07"
C39
533.00'
126.94'
126.64'
13°38'43"
C38
467.00'
211.78'
209.97'
25°59'00"
C30

81.24'

61.57'

60.10'
43*25'14"
C28

50.00'

38.28'

37.35'
43°52'05"
C27
2967.00'
940.75'
936.81'
18*10'01"
C26
1005.50'
484.34'
479.67'
27°35'56"
C25
1844.00'
171.59'
171.53'
5*19'54"
C29
3033.00'
495.42'
494.87'
9°21'32"
C24
1939.50'
101.15'
101.14'
2*59'17"
C23
939.50'
452.55'
448.19'
27°35'56"
C22
1844.00'
509.92'
508.30'
15°50'39"
C21
1756.00'
214.54'
214.40'
7°00'00"
17 1033.00'
655.58'
644.63'
36°21'43"

CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
DELTA
18 50.00'

42.24'

41.00'
48°24'26"
19 50.00'

38.50'

37.55'
44°06'45"
20 1 88.85'

72.73'

70.71'
46°53'53"

LAND OWNER

PALMER GENERAL CORPORATION
32335 LIVE OAK CANYON RD
REDLANDS, CA 92373
(909)-534-6958

APPLICANT

TERRI ALLEN

PI DEVELOPMENT, LLC
6272 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, STE E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
(714) 717-7843

SURVEYOR
PBLA SURVEYING, INC.
1481 FORD ST., STE 201
REDLANDS, CA 92373
(888) 714-9672

CIVIL ENGINEER

JACOB GLAZE

KIMLEY-HORN
1100 W TOWN AND COUNTRY, SUITE 700
ORANGE, CA 92868
(714) 705-1374
RGA
Kiom ey))) Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
D A
QRpFESS/phgC
S
0 J m
w
* C 8793470
9TF CIV1\ F(D
°F cA\-1
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
Y U C A�PA CA

CONCEPTUAL OVERALL SITE PLAN
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 # # # # # #
SCALE: 1 " = 200'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
OF

SHEET TITLE
j_ _ _._-'-- _ -a___.......

LEGEND
— — PROPERTY LINE
— — — — — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE

SECTION OUTLINE

TERRIS DRAIN

PAVEMENT
+ + + + + HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING
b.10 INTER
H/GHI
7 7
+
+
+ +
,i
a.

II
11V
1 1
R GA
Klomley)))Horn
O 2021 KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
:D AC C
OA
S
COVV
C C
PROF ESS / pNq<
F,� S
� F'- i
WOi i''�`" m
C 87934 A
sT Q
9TF CIVIL
OF cA0
Office of Architectural
Design
g
15231 Alton Parkway,SUlte 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922

YUCA PA
9 CONCEPTUAL GRADNIG
C A

OVERALL PLAN
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 100 200 400
SCALE: 1 " = 200'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
OF

SHEET TITLE
(3
0 '�' 0
1009

/
\ I I
LEGEND
- - PROPERTY LINE
--�- - - - - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE
- STREET CENTERLINE
2166 PROPOSED CONTOURS
/ -
- - 2166 - EXISTING CONTOURS
S/ u GB PROPOSED GRADE BREAK
\\ R
\ \ PROPOSED RIDGE

DAYLIGHT LINE

TR TOP OF RAMP
\ TW TOP OF WALL
\ TC TOP OF CURB
\ FS FINISHED SURFACE

TS TOP OF STAIRS
I

BS BOTTOM OF STAIRS
/ HP HIGH POINT
2166.50 TC
(2166.00 FS) EXISTING GRADE
/ 2166.50 TC
2166.00 FS PROPOSED GRADE

TERRIS DRAIN
/ PAVEMENT
/ HYDROSEED
I
\� LANDSCAPING
y PROPOSED SLOPE
2050.00 F
Q / / / 7
A II
// /!
1996.52"FS
/ 1996.48 TC
/ /1995.9&FL /+= 1998.21 FS
/ / 11/1996.15 LIP 2001.24'TC
/ 1996.550HP,
/ 2000.74,FL\ 1996.48;TC ''' 2000.85 LIPS
11995.98 FL 1998.25 HP
1996.15 LIP
J / 1996.52 FS
o
CD
� N \
Ar
052.26-FL
052.43.LIP- '
2000.85-LIP
1998.22 FS
° �`o� - - - - �� i - - / 2040.90 FS - 2052.44 LIP
-2040.87°TC- - - - - - - 2052.79 FS
° 2036.14 f S - - 2040. 37 FL
/ 2019.90-FS 2036.11-TC _ _ - - _ L -2040.53 LIP/-
\ 2019.87 TC 2035.61:FL / / - _ - - 2040.93;HP --
\ -2019.37:FL '2035.77 LIP_
2040.8\7TC
2035.53LIP 2035 640203617'HP 2040.37FL
POLE 2019.93 HP- 045- -2040.53,LIP2036.11-T
2035.61'FL-
- �2\\\0`\ 0\`vF`S-2019.87 TC ? - - - - - /////\`
-205p -4.9
/2019.37 FL- 2035.771I
2035.53:LIP 06207�0FS 2019.920 2100
2��5�2j20
5 /// /�//�// /j jiijj✓ / / jjjjjjj/�/jj jj�j// /X �'`� II i I/ / \` / L 7� --_ RGA
Kim ey))) Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
PROFESS/ONq(
c� m
C 87934
sT Q
9TF cjv�\-
OF cA��
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
Y U C \�PA CA
i
CONCEPTUAL GRADflG AND DRA NAGE PLAN I
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60 120
SCALE: 1 " = 60'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
OF

SHEET TITLE
G1 00
1010

71 X X
- = I
<
o POLE
206
2065
20 2085 I �� \\\ \ \ _---------
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 21 / 1 \ \\ \ ��\� \ ----- ------ --- \------------------_---_'�'/
\� 2110
\2120
\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\71\ \ \ 2130
2140
/ \ 2 65 J j \
216
A \ I \ 21g0 \ _ _ -- - 2155 95 / I \ \ \ \ \\\\\\�I\ \ \ \� �\ \ \ 21955-II i ir- 7,77
_2205' \ \ 217.00FS
�2150.00TS/ _�2210
��2215
2161..27-_TIC
2160.7722%-.220 25 216178TC
2250.00=FS 2161.28=FS2-250 2235S
�
2240\
- 2245
a°
0 - _ _ _ � \ V -7, \ � \ � fi \ \ 2250
2200 0/0'FS / \ 225 _ - _ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ -_- -
_ I 1 X
-
/ 1 / �6
-75
\ \ I 11 l / / /i /
// / I / 2170.74FS
'20 2080----/ \
o. 8s / \ I \ \ 1 I III\\I I\ /
I
gs /
-2100- \j 1
71 '-21 \273 _-2130_-�\� \\\ \ \ � ,/ \ \ \ \\ okoLO
21 N"
_ N" S\��\F0 's�\7+ I I I /" / gy(V, I-
\-w 40
/ / \ _ 1 (V co co /
per` �_ J
21ap -\ '�---2185E-_ \�\�\\\��\�\ \\''�� \ � \\ - � /' `2 � _ \
ZL
75 \60`___=
21-55
_-2250.0o Fs / / / / / \ / -215�-
2120-__-%/i
/ / /j/ I /� / ` �--------�\ ` ---- 2152.07_TC i N' -� co �23S / / // 1/ 2115 ////�i ''///ii/ / / / / l / \\ �' - -�� /i/ / /N' / Ln / �//j�//�// �j�= -I�\ \\ 2151.57FS_ /
/ 2152.36TC, /2176.02FS
2220 / L / ' / / // 2151.86�FS -
\ ROAD ACCESS (CONCEPT) / �\ \ _2151.44'TC
2219.65 FSI i + -2250.00 FS- �� / / \� \ 2150.94 FS
2210 C 21S
2149.71T5.1%
\
22151.29
� -
---- _ \ 21gp�� _ ---_ / I \ �- \\ \ \ \ - / \ ,�\\ \��-// -// ' �- 1 I I I �� 2150.79FS/ \ � 2149.45FS
i �5
I \ _ 2161.87•1 S o 7 /p �\
21 2750 2178.54.S-/
�21 / / I
/ 1,50 ` - _ �\ 45
� - \89\
2250.00 FS
2164.-0FS - _\ \ / \ \\ ` \ / \ \ \ \\Ln
2100.00-FS 2100 - \ \ _ _- _ / \
-- _ \ \ _ -_- \ � \per N
2p95 - - - - \ - t� \ r_ \
d-Lo_�c0�_� 00 \
2140
2150
CIA
:2095 = Nrn- 1 p _ \ - -_ _ - - 70 6 \/' -- - 2135
�o �- I - \g
2130.43;TC \
2115, 21102105=/i2129.931`S
=-2130 2125/ 2120 2098.98'FS
---//// ---- ��///// --------- 2140=214p2135 �_ 2098.95_TC -��o� - - - �\ / '/ 2127.81TC / /�, - 2192.15E _-_ ��E�2098.6111P-
098.45-FL I - �// _
_ � / - 2127.31:FS \ / / �/ / / / / / 0 CURB \
_ 2150_ - \ 0�.0%- �� \ /
5=2155/ 2126.97�FS / 2130.43'TC 2129.06�FS \ \
--_ 2170 - - \ \\ _ �\ , / /
-2165 N �2126.94 TC \ l / 2129.93 FS 2162.21 FS \�
2170 - 2098.95 TC \ \ \ n • \ _ ,2126.44 FL 21 I I / -2185- \ � 3 41 // / 2180- 2098.45�FL \ \ \
2126.601E \ \ \ I \
2185 2098.61;LIP \ \ \ \\ `� \ \ 1 l / 0 CURB \ \
-----2190-- 2195 2190- - - \ \ \ \\-� N� \ \ / / I 2128.85•FS - - - - - /-- - 2098.98•FS \ \ \\ \ \ I / 1 \ \ I I \ -`\� -\ \\� �\ J / / -------------/----- --- \ \ \ _ \ N \ \\ \ 2128.95•FS \ /� 5 2790_-- \�� //��_\ _-�� \\� I \ \ \ \ �\ -- \ 1 ` Jl 2128.92TC �218 -_ -- -// /� = \\ � \ / )/ I \ \ � i \`- \ \ _ N - � 2128.42•FL 2128.58•1 IP
2128.98-HP
/2=16-5'2/��• s� -\ \ \--/// /\-��\ 1\\�I / \\
0\ \\\ 2127.00-HP /
� �
--t 3S�A \ I ` \\ \\ \\ �\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ 2126.94TC
2126.44•FIL
\ // / - \_'�� / /�\ \ 1 \\\\ \ \ \ \ LIP
2128.92.TC
2126.97 FS
_/ \ \ \_�
_---;-'i/o �o� \\\� // / \ \\`__\\ �\ \I I \\\ \`\ \ \
\\ \`______
/
2128.42.FL
2128.58.LIP- \
<2128.95•FS
LEGEND
- -

PROPERTY LINE
- - - - - - -
- - -
- EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE
2166

PROPOSED CONTOURS
- - 2166
-

EXISTING CONTOURS

PROPOSED GRADE BREAK
GB

PROPOSED RIDGE
R

DAYLIGHT LINE
11 TR

TOP OF RAMP
TW

TOP OF WALL
TIC

TOP OF CURB
FS

FINISHED SURFACE
TS

TOP OF STAIRS
BS

BOTTOM OF STAIRS
HP

HIGH POINT
2166.50
TC
(2166.00
FS)

EXISTING GRADE
2166.50
TC
2166 00
FS

PROPOSED GRADE
-_ - TERRIS DRAIN

PAVEMENT

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING
y PROPOSED SLOPE
f 180.0' 50.0' f 122.0'

PROPOSED HYDROSEED PROPOSED ROAD PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
2'1
�l�Xq

A -A SECTION

NOT TO SCALE
R GA
Kim ey))) Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

PROFESS/O/V
S C<9c� cZ
c� m
C 87934
sT Q
9TF 0jV�� Fob`,
OF cp'0
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922

Y U C A P A C A
i
CONCEPTUAL GRADNG AND DRAhAGE PLAN L
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda
2�g

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60 120
SCALE: 1 " = 60'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
OF

SHEET TITLE
(3
2,�,
0 6
-2185 / / \ / / / \ // I ((/
I
LEGEND
LEGEND
-
/`Z, / i21ap,
,21
,Z�g 22gg

17.00. \-\2163.85`_TC�-
`------� - --- -----------� -- ----------� ---- ��-------� -------------� '--- --- --- -�- - ------ � ---- �------ �------�'--- - I - `-- - - -=- -�-�- - -- ----------� ------ � �� 05 /22\p 2217.00.FS�Tr/ - \ \ 2163.35-FS --------- ---� -- --_ - - -- - - - \ - _ - ---- - - - 2163.35-FS•- - 22 -
jz
2162.23,FS \ 2162.757C/r 1�1
\ \
IF
2162.25 FS / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ /
2 \2730
635C \\X
2161.35TC
I
2160.85FS \\\ Illot�\\\\ \ \�_ / / \\\\�\\__�/ �� I `2J3 / /' - \\ ) I �l \ �( \ \ \\ I I / 2160.85FS 2161.85TC I I I I \ \ 1 l\ \_ \ / \
2161.35FS2J1p-
//
/ 2166.00FS \\ //// / //\ \ \ \�-- ////- \ 1 1 \\\\ �S / //-_\\ \ \\ / \_\) \ \ ) / 1 ��' \ 2161.35FS I� 2166.00FS0
o
2165-=/
2180= 2175= /, - 9p�/� \\ \�\ \ \ \ .. / 1 / '\ l L . I I - / / \ \ \ 1 1 i/2166.00 TW / .21 \ \ \ / \ \ I I L - - I / 2162.00 FS
2165.72 TIC \ \ \ km�j - 2185 _ _
2165.22FS_- 2166.00TW =220 \
l� 2162.00FS r / \\ \\\� :2_210-2205_��/%-\\\\\\-
2166.00FS - \ 2220-_=-2215-
- 2225
IV I
\ \ /
FFE: 2166.00
2162.07 TIC
2161.57 FS
2159.12-TC
2158.62 FS \ 2162.35 TIC / \
/\ I \ / / / i / , V \�(
2158.79 TIC \ 2161.85 FS / \ \ / / \ \ / / / I / - / / / / / \ 2158.29-FS2220-
,-
N
/ / I ( \ \ \ \\ /
I I \// O
/ � \ / III �\ I 1 ► / / � � , / \ �\- / �\�\
\\'9
\�\-�llI I \\� \ --' S_ /'�' l
2160
_
\ S Ln
N
�_--2155- \ I \ 1 1 1 \
/ t / / / / --- \ ► I I 1 I l \ --- \ \ \ I III I
---2165.72TC® - \ --\--_ 2162.00FS (\ \ \
-� 2166.00TW _J /// / / __----_ \ \ \\ > I I 1 1 �\ \ \ \ I 2165.22 FS 2166.00 TW / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ - \ � � • 1 \ 1 1 \ 2162.00TC'-\, 2162.00FS / //�j/// / --'/ \�\ \\` \. \ \`. - --� \ \ \ \ 2\ 600FS.\ 1 1 \\\\\ \\ 2161.50.FS- - - \ J 1
- - 0 - �2161.90-TC' - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ .. .. \ 2162.00 TC S 2165.85.TC 2161.40'FS \ \\\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ - - - - _ - 2161.50 FS I I 2165.35.FS\ / // // \\ \ - -_ \ ,\ �\
\ - / // / 1 \ \ _ oI ` 2161.90 TC \\ / I I I I /
\ / \ \ \x \ / - - - �l 2161.40 FS \
\ 2165.5tFS 2161.40 FS \ \/' / / / - - / l I l (/ / 2161.40 FS \ \ \ \� I� I I I �2161.75TC
\o\\/ / - \\ \ \ \ \ \ / ///// / - II \ \< \ i 2161.75TC ✓/ / 2161.25FS \ \ \\ \ I\\- / \ \ _-J \) \\�\\\\ ,\ 2161.25FS I I ✓ 2161.05 TIC
\ w 2160 ✓ 2160.55,FS''; \ \ \ \\ \ b�
I /
,2155
\ 2141.28.FS�2150_�/
2145
"2159.55'TC------------- \.\ ---- ---- ----- --- 2158.52:TC 1 / 2159.05 FS \ 2158.02 FS
Ff-
( / I-157.97 TIC I
2157.47FS�
-----------�-- �-�-- -�= -- - - - --- - - --=-- _ - - ----- - - -F---- - - ----------- - -- - ---- �- -2160= -- --- =-- ---------- - -- -- --------�-�------------ -- -- ------------------------------------ 2160.10 TC 2146.67 FS / / / / I/ v v I I _ 1 <- / / �\ -- - -2 8 �='�0 _ - 2159.60-FS- _ � � /
2145 25'FS - - - - / - 2183.80'FS
/ 2190��2211.29-FS 7- v _ / 2153.79 FS
N _ \ 2145.23 TIC / 2200- 2� 2153.77.TC
�\ \ 2144.73fl- 2150.78=FS 2152.43-FS 2153.27�FL
2144_.89_-.LIP/ �- �- . 55-� 9i 214618TC '2150.76-TC
2152.40TC_
2153.43 LIP
2146.21FS 2150.26FL 22153.83 HP2144.54'FS .2, 2150.32'LIP \\'2144.01,TC 2g0 2151.06-LIP
1FL .2150.72.HP 215246HP 2153
S.\2144.01L 21 2145.85LIP2144.17LIP C 2152.40.TC 2153.2777 ,FTL70 2150.66.T
2146.247HPT�2150.16TL C i
2160 2146.18-TC 2149.43 FS 2150.32 LIP 2151.90 FL 2153.43 LIP -2155 2151.06; IP-2153.80FE
/ / I ` \ \ - - 2145.68-FL 0 CURB
/ ((� \\\ \\ O 27 g2145.85LIP 21492150.68 FS
9 _ 1 I I �_ -� = -2150 -.40-TC i
\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ Ill 1 ` \ \\ \\ �• O 12144.57,HP
214624;FS 2148.90-FL 2149.061LIP
.�
0 CURB / � 2152.14 FS
\\��215\ \ / / /��'� 2145.29HP l
2 \ \ \ I \ \ \ 2144.51'TC, �s
�2 0S �,\ / \ \ \ / 2144.01 FL -2144.91 FS-
0-\\��_� / /\\\\\ \ \\\ / 2144.17LIP\ \\ -/ / /
�19\�--' _/ / /� // \� \ \\\ \ (-2144.54-FS��/
- -2144.34 - -
- 02 \- // / \\ \ I / / / \\\ \\ \\ \ \ \� // \ _--
2165 \\\ \18S-_/.-/ \\\\\ \\\ I \ / \ �( / //\\ \\ C\\ \ \ \\ 2143.84FS\ \ \\ / / / 2143.12TC / 2145
t�:\ \ -/ 2145.63TC
12142.62'FS. 2145.13FS
V
\2143.27 TC 1 \1\1\ / / // / / �/ /\ \\ l II I 1 2142.77�FS / _50.97 F
-----
-
2150.26TC
2149.76:FS
2149.46 HP
•2149.40•TC
2152.95.TC�
2148.90 FIL
2152.45 FS
-2149.06_LIP
�% I
2149.43 FS
i
2152.20 TIC
2151.70 FS
/
2 j2184.19,FS
� 2
/ / r
� 1-7
\ \\ \\
- -

PROPERTY LINE
- - - - - - -
- - -
- EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE
2166

PROPOSED CONTOURS
- - 2166
-

EXISTING CONTOURS

PROPOSED GRADE BREAK
GB

PROPOSED RIDGE
R

DAYLIGHT LINE
11 TR

TOP OF RAMP
TW

TOP OF WALL
TIC

TOP OF CURB
FS

FINISHED SURFACE
TS

TOP OF STAIRS
BS

BOTTOM OF STAIRS
HP

HIGH POINT
2166.50
TC
(2166.00
FS)

EXISTING GRADE
2166.50
TC
2166 00
FS

PROPOSED GRADE
-_ TERRIS DRAIN

PAVEMENT

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING
y PROPOSED SLOPE
f 9 2.0' 5.0' 44.0' 1 6.0' 1 5.0' 1 f 6 9.0'

B-B SECTION

NOT TO SCALE

PROPOSED
HYDROSEED - 5.0' 44.0' 6.0' 5.0' f174.0'

GC SECTION

NOT TO SCALE
RGA
Koim ey))) Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

PROFESS/O/V
S C<9c� cZ
c� m
C 87934
�r _
sT Q
9TF CV��
OF cA��
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922

Y U C A P A C A
i
CONCEPTUAL GRADNG AND DRAhAGE PLAN
3 MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60 120
SCALE: 1 " = 60'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
OF

SHEET TITLE
(3
3'�'
0 1012

LEGEND
— — PROPERTY LINE
— — — — — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE
i
// / / /-------- 7//
4000�<
jj �i / /// / j / j �� `\ _ _ �✓--- — �i i �/ ///�i_--/'' \ \\�� \\\ _ \ \ \\1 \\� 212 0T�25- —\ \ \\ \ _—__—2140
2192FS_—� \ 21<2145
2214.60•FS 2j7S5-2155
'2
\\\ \
2135_\40
—�
213\p2125
L— /— � oI/��
2, Lr)
p )I II 2 ps
7p s c2(V N 100f) 2—2200
� N
2�7K� NO7S 70
2165 .+
0�2N 22IIo s 2221j78S.0
O.FS
N
SS 205
11 1,J 21gs— /� N
�5�/5
�220 I / —go_
o / 11 11 I // / l // �� 2�g5_

STREET CENTERLINE
2166 PROPOSED CONTOURS
- 2166 — EXISTING CONTOURS

GB PROPOSED GRADE BREAK

R PROPOSED RIDGE
-11 DAYLIGHT LINE

TR TOP OF RAMP

TW TOP OF WALL

TC TOP OF CURB

FS FINISHED SURFACE

TS TOP OF STAIRS

BS BOTTOM OF STAIRS

HP HIGH POINT
2166.50 TC
(2166.00 FS) EXISTING GRADE
2166.50 TC
2166.00 FS PROPOSED GRADE
-----------------

TERRIS DRAIN

PAVEMENT

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING
X.X% PROPOSED SLOPE
RGA
Koim ey))) Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
:D
PROFESS/ONq(
S C<9c� cZ
c� m
C 87934
sT Q
9TF CIV��
OF CA,-�
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
Y U C \�PA CA
i
CONCEPTUAL GRADflG AND DRA NAGE
PLAN
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60 120
SCALE: 1 " = 60'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
OF

SHEET TITLE
(3
4,�,
0 1013

Al
2196.83 FS � 1 I / / / / I \ \ \
N ^ L0 o
I \ ^
00 / °,oCIV
1 I 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
�2200 -�`L(�
2220//
/ // // // /� \ \_ / I \ \\ \ N\ \ - � 1 II 1 // /�� /22�/ / / / -----_---�- - � � \ \ - \ j- / /2167.03`TC+} i \ \ \ 1 \ \ ( - - \ \ \ / // 2235- / / i - - - - - - I 2166.53.FS-�_"-\� \-- \ \ \ \ \ \ -J I i �� i / / / r� I _ -- 2166.50 TC
2166.00 FS
- - - - - - - - - - - ----__
2165.72.TC_ \\ \v/ ------ _
' 2165.22FS I � - \� \ / / \ \ - - - - - ---- / ��
� I' it Y � \� �/ �--------- �_-- � J / I -+ // � / I I I I I \ _ \/ � / � 2187.43FS ///� \ \ 2 /\�- �2182.72FS _- - -
/ / / \ �9 2182.72.TC- 2187.43TC
\ `, / � _-------------------� \\ / i / / / �- � I I 1 \ �-/ 2182.22-FL Ir' \ „/// \� \\------------------ �\ \ .J I I l I �' / / _ \ / / /-- \ /// J I I I ---��\ \/// 2182.38LIP-- �2187.09LIP _ _ _ - _ \ \ I I I \ \ I / I �\ \ / / - / / ) I I I 1 2182.78=HP 2187.49 HP //-\\\\\\\ \ S d� 2187.43TC
------- 3F86.932FLN 2187.09LIPN
U_ N 2176.53
2187.4611-S -
°� I o2176.53 TC
N' / \ \ C / / / % / \ \ \ _ / \ 2176.03 FL 2i� N /
N ' - - \/\ +/ / / j / / /� \\\\ \ ` _ + - 6.19'LIP i ' 2182.72 TC _ \ c:� Sri' 2176.59 HP� / / 278 L 2182.22,FL
N NI 0 / � 2182.38LIP
2182.75'FS
\ I _
2178.35 TC /

CURB I / /
2177.85 FL / / /
2230 _ / / / \ \ \ I / /
/�' -/ I ( + 1 \ I 0 CURB/ / /2178.38 FS /
\\�, \\- \\ / I �/ I 1 I 1 II 2176.15FS / /
/ i \ III \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ �\ `L/ J \\ I \ / - / 1 / I, / - / 2178. 70 TC �O - // \\ \ �\ \ / \ I I / / I , 2175.78'TC / 2178.20 FS/ /-�`'��`� � ( + / /-2175.28 FL .� 2176.19
/ \ \ 1 \ - �) I I < < 2175.44`LIP
/ \ \ \ / 12175.81;FS/ /' ///
�20- l \ \ �/ \ \ \ 1 J
/ � 1 � � '•� \ 1 �1 I � I \ S, �'� � + I I � 1 I \ � � � 2175 �, � � �, / / � / , / / � / ( \ \ � � - J \ \ 1 2190'/' \ / /' I 1 I \ / -` �� , / 2179.42'TC
�/ \ \ \ \
} / 2178.92 FS I
/ '"' / / \' ' \ \ I g0 - - �� - +/ �'` \ \ \ / s 2178.92 FS / / / l 1 '21 / / i / / \ \ / 2179.42 TC /
2171.38'TC
2170.88 FL
2171.04LIP
/ 2171 41•FSI 2193.34 FS
o -
i 2179.16 - I \ \ \ l
1 I / 2234.49-FS 2�� I / / / / I 2171,11 FS ,� ��
U" CURB / 2171.79 TC i g0 i ' - - \ \
+ �� `L ! � � �"- � \ 2178.66FrS
2171.17 FS 2171.29 FS/ / _ - 2177.38 TC
2162.45-TC i \ /
I I I " / o ,� / / -
/ I I \ 0 CURB i `L 2176.88 FS-
/ I((/ 2161.95-FS \ \\ �- / I I ( \ / 2170.45FS � �' '
I I I I 2162.85 TC \ - I �' \ \ \ / / 1 N / 2193 34 FS
III 2162.35 FSL -
/
/ 2165.14 TC-
2164.64 FS \\ \\ I \ \ I
2165.14TC
2164.64 FS� '2161.74 TIC / \
_ 2161 24 FS� /
1\ 1\ \ \ \ 2162.14 TC / \ \ J / / �0.N
1 216 4.5 4 TC�\ \ \ _ �+ +/ 2185.56 FS
2164.04.FS`� I I \
2161.10 TC
2160.60 FS I /
�
2160 71 TC
0" CURB
2170.27 FS
2170.11.TC
\ I 20022� �/2169.61 FL /
2169 76-LIP 2171.7
�°�/ 0�2�90 // /'2170.13,FS / 2171.2
2163.75 N�
i
2163.75'TC
2163.25,FL-
I 2163.39LIP
2163.80-HP *"2 81.7 F1 S
5 �
216TFS,
2161.83'TC-
2161.33'FL
2161.449,LIP /
2161.89`HP
\\ 2160.21 FS
I I \
\ 2161.17,TC
1 F\ \ / it-2160.67 FS 2159..62 FS /
2160.31,TC \ 2159.68 HP
2159.8S11
2179.58 TC / /' - / / //
2179.08 FS C14
2180.08�TC - o
qI A No�
197.44FS
9 TC" 4 - 2179.58 FS -� cv o �
2i � / / // ° � --- -- � �
00 2178.642178.14 FS / / \ \ \\ I 1 -� / _ \ I I I I \ \✓ / /, I I / // / \\ ,2178.14-1-
S
o I /
2179.20TC
2178.70 FS
\ \ / 2178.701TC \ \ I I I
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2178.20 FS\\ - _ °\ \ I I
21 , .50'TC
LEGEND
- -

PROPERTY LINE
- - - - - - - - -
- - EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE
2166

PROPOSED CONTOURS
- - 2166 -

EXISTING CONTOURS
GB

PROPOSED GRADE BREAK
R

PROPOSED RIDGE
11 DAYLIGHT LINE
TR

TOP OF RAMP
TW

TOP OF WALL
TC

TOP OF CURB
FS

FINISHED SURFACE
TS

TOP OF STAIRS
BS

BOTTOM OF STAIRS
HP

HIGH POINT
2166.50 TC
(2166.00 FS)

EXISTING GRADE
2166.50 TC
2166.00 FS

PROPOSED GRADE

TE R R I S DRAIN

PAVEMENT
+

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING

PROPOSED
HYDROSEED - 5.0' 44.0'

PROPOSED PROPOSED ROAD
TERRA
DRAIN
X. PROPOSED SLOPE

6.0' 5.0'

PROPOSED PROPOSED

SIDEWALK TERRA
DRAIN

D-D SECTION

NOT TO SCALE

PROPOSED
HYDROSEED - 5.0' 44.0' 6.0' 5.0'

PROPOSED PROPOSED ROAD PROPOSED PROPOSED

TERRA SIDEWALK TERRA

DRAIN DRAIN

2.• �
IIi��X9•
��`2177.00,FS
\ 2183.2&TC
\ 218aFS TC
2178.85.FS-\ V v \V A V/
-2183.45 FS \ _ 2178.83 FS\ _ - �,+ \ \ �/ E
/6N 2183.45TW
2179.45FS \ \
�2207.69 FS
0" CURB-
/ Oc, CURB // / 2160 / / / / \ r00-
�� _2157.60FS �i/ / ' 2161.83TC / �/`�
2157.25 FS // / / - 2180.00'TC �9 ( / ( i \ r` \ (0-
2161.33-FL - 2179.50,FS + \\
/2157.22,TC / 2161.49 LIP
�- 2156.72 FL / / / / �/ 2161.86.FS
2156.88-LIP
2157 2;HP' �. \� i/ 1 \\ - - - -2
2212.79-FS --' I I-_�� I I I \ 1l0.-_ _2159_.62"TC
2159.12FL 2180.99-TC
,-( 5�
2159.28'LIP 2179.23;TC- 2180.49 FS�� 21565;FS 2178.73FS_ FFE: 2183.45 - -'
- -- +
-
2179.23-TC-
i/ 2155
2157.22-TC 1�5 2 0 0 �' /� l l / I 1 \ / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ / i / 2156.72•FL, -
/ 2156.88-LIP 2�g5� ? -- / III / / ' \ / < 2179.35 TC� \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ / / ' \ I I ]" �� / / / \ \ \\\ - - - - / / / / o / Z�gS / \ / ( ( l - 2178.85 FS�`ti / _ / - cA
2157.25'FS �/ _ / I I � \ \ \ - - _ / \ \ 1 /
I \ \ / \ \ \ \ \ , \ / 1 / \ \ 1 / _ _/ N s�
�/ ' ,� 9°✓ 1a5 _21a� i / //"� ` �\ \ \ 1 2183.45FS \ \ \\ \ \ \ ' / ' 'J// // / - s,o��''• 21 ? �`-�
0i 2183.45TW
2179.45 FS
12179.20TC / / \ \ 1 I \\ \ \ \ \ \v/// /-\ \ \vl/ /j-\ \ \ I °� o/ `vi- 1 / / / / l \ / / I / ��% 2178.70FS / j ll/ / I / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / \\ \ 0)ivl
\ / / \ l / \ wl
L \ 2178.70-TC,
i � \u�2178.20-F- S--,278.85FS ✓ lNcv1 I C', \
N
�C`I'
/2177.55T2177.05FS
2205.30TC
�LID
. ` ` I \ � _ --�/ /� � �, �\\ 220� ; � � - � , �, �, \ \ /, _ _ __ � / / / � / / / / /' � - --, \ \ \ / � \\\ \\ \ .� / / / �/ / / / �• � \ III I I I I � - � �' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ', z1 b�. i4 1(-, 2180.66 TC - - \
2163.24•FL 2180.16 FS
/ 2163.39 LIP
/-163.76 FS /

E SECTION

NOT TO SCALE
R G A
Koim ey))) Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM

PROFESS/OIV
S C<9c� cZ
c� m
C 87934
�r -
sT Q
9TF CIV��

OF CAI-
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922

Y U C A P A C A
i
CONCEPTUAL GRAD�NG AND DRAhAGE PLAN
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda
T.
f 145.0'

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
f112.0'

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
280
P�1° \�

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60 120
SCALE: 1 " = 60'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
OF

SHEET TITLE
(3
5'�'
0 1014

,I/
- - / T I�_�,
I �, TC V h 3.2% \ \ \\ \ - / /�- _�
2156.6&FS
1,01
\ .2
�00� _ ' ( �� / / 2� \\\\ \ /
CN
j
\ \ \ \ -2213.00=FS\�
°° \ �\\\\ \— _2^\�p^ S R /"/
° 2110 o\ 2�2o`N — I I I \\ N �_ / // \
_ \° \ \\ /j��l// I /� `�/ 111 \
\
Sp /1D
/ _ \
2135.05FS / + / I ( //� c3` \\ \\ \ NV -Ott`
2159.38,TC�
\�-'2158. &Fs \� yo,
/ J I I I I ( - \ \ ca \ _2205.30;TC
\
— / — — 219U\
2195-
/ / 2160.39 FS .N o \ - _ _ - - \ \ // / -
-\\\
2182.13 FS / d' / / / i - o ��n' o;'iri-o \ J / \ `
2160.19 TC �� \ \ �w \� \ \ - \ \ / / \ \ / 221p�-
/ / / / / / I I /2159.69 FS / /� \ \ \ \ \ \� \ �N�N��-, .�- � N- \ \ — - \ \ \ / / / � \ \ / / -\ \\ � � 2 2215_ 21,25
/ C.

I
2� 15
/ o\ ,
—
_
pl
l ,
\ \\\--------—2125,\°--_—_
--- 2130->
�_ \ �x� \ \ \\ \ \ I
�'��, \
`
�'�2135
—2145,\
\ \ �2160 1 I / I \
— 2205.68 FS 215
\a2205.68 FS
2215.04 TC
2214.54FS
\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ I ,
2213.89'TC
�� / / / - \ \ \ ✓ / _ - - 2213.39.FS
'2213.89'TC
2213.39,FS
\\ —
—
a
\
\
\
LEGEND
— —

PROPERTY LINE
— — — — — — — — —
— — EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE
2166

PROPOSED CONTOURS
— — 2166 —

EXISTING CONTOURS
GB

PROPOSED GRADE BREAK
R

PROPOSED RIDGE
11 DAYLIGHT LINE
TR

TOP OF RAMP
TW

TOP OF WALL
TC

TOP OF CURB
FS

FINISHED SURFACE
TS

TOP OF STAIRS
BS

BOTTOM OF STAIRS
HP

HIGH POINT
2166.50 TC
(2166.00 FS)

EXISTING GRADE
2166.50 TC
2166.00 FS

PROPOSED GRADE
______ _ ___ __ _

TE R R I S DRAIN

PAVEMENT

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING
y PROPOSED SLOPE
RGA
Kim ey))) Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
PROFESS/ONq(
c� m
C 87934
�r _
sT Q
9TF 0jv�\_
OF cA��
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922

Y U C A P A C A
i
CONCEPTUAL GRADNG AND DRA�NAGE
PLAN 6
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 30 60 120
SCALE: 1 " = 60'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
OF

SHEET TITLE
(3
6,�,
0 1015

LEGEND
2205
\ \ \ \ \ s 2210
\\\� cam\
\ \
\o
0 \\\\ \
FIFE: 2183.45
\\\ \
2270
c'�
co 00
\ I
\\1\ 2255?6'0
`
2250 \ — _ _ / I I 1 \ / \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I 1 ` \ \ \ ✓ / / / / \ \ \ \ o
��
\ N� \ \ ,,\ 1 / / /� �____
_7 / / l /\ \ \
2177.5&TC
00 FS
2178.84FS ! �2178.60TC
2178.10FS
/0/ // \
2179.45 FS
217888TC
2178.38:FS
/0/
1 \ _
, I / / I // / �\\\�✓i� \\\1\I�I\1 � //// �/I J I I I /\\\� / I 1 I / \ \\\ I � I / // \ \\ / � /� /I�%/ / / / j /% \\_\ \\ \\ \� �� 2183.78 TC111
2183.28"FS�
' I / - 2180
2179.45,FS
\ \ \\s I I 2178.85FS
—2 ;7
s >
65 160
1SS C � 2178.74 TC
/ \
\\_2178.24-FS
0 \\ \ \ --- --- --- /--
_\ \ &Q0 X
oP/� _ ----- _T
\\\\\X�\�
— —

PROPERTY LINE
-----------

EASEMENT LINE

STREET CENTERLINE
2166

PROPOSED CONTOURS
— - 2166 —

EXISTING CONTOURS
GB

PROPOSED GRADE BREAK
R

PROPOSED RIDGE
11 DAYLIGHT LINE
TR

TOP OF RAMP
TW

TOP OF WALL
TC

TOP OF CURB
FS

FINISHED SURFACE
TS

TOP OF STAIRS
BS

BOTTOM OF STAIRS
HP

HIGH POINT
2166.50 TC
(2166.00 FS)

EXISTING GRADE
2166.50 TC
2166.00 FS

PROPOSED GRADE

TE R R I S DRAIN

PAVEMENT

HYDROSEED

LANDSCAPING
y

PROPOSED SLOPE
RGA
Koim ey))) Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
1100 W. TOWN AND COUNTRY RD, SUITE 700, ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: 714-939-1030
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM

PROF E S S / C)/V
y ��OO� S C<9c� cZ
c� m
C 87934
sT Q
9TF CIAO-
°F cA��
Office of Architectural
Design
15231 Alton Parkway,Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
T 949-341-0920
FX 949-341-0922
YUCA�PA CA
i
CONCEPTUAL GRADNG AND DRAhAGE
PLAN 7
MARK
DATE

DESCRIPTION
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda

GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 ## ## ##
SCALE: 1 " = 20'

WHEN PRINTED AT FULL
SIZE 30"X42"
RGA PROJECT NO:
20128.00
CAD FILE NAME:

DRAWN BY:

TA
CHK'D BY:

JR
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
OF

SHEET TITLE
(3
7,�,
0 1016

FINISH LEGEND:

ARCHITECT:

WEST ELEVATION

SOUTH ELEVATION
OTAAInIAVl Prnnn 7111A/Inr nr\/rAl nAIKITrn n(lhrnIT PTnnInInIrl Prnnn qv Mini— nr\/rAl hI rnrPTnn\/ 711 MInr nn/FAI III minr nr\/rAI

EAST ELEVATION

NORTH ELEVATION
APPLICANT:
f PA
6272 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE #E
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
TEL:

CONTACT: TERRI ALLEN
EMAIL:

IFI PACIFIC OAKS COMMERCE

YUCAIPA, CA
SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS PLAN - BUILDING 1
CENTER
P-1:

FIELD PAINT - SW7666 WESTHIGHLAND WHITE
P-2:

ACCENT PAINT - SW7634 PEDIMENT
P-3:

ACCENT PAINT - SW7024 FUNCTIONAL GRAY
P-4:

ACCENT PAINT - SW7025 BACKDROP
P-5:

ACCENT PAINT - SW6251 OUTERSPACE
GLAZING:

PPG SOLARCOOL PACIFICA BLUE
STOREFRONT: AB6 DARK BRONZE
SIDING:

STANDING SEAM VERTICAL METAL

SIDING AT ENTRY TOWER
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 0' 10' 20' 50' 100'
SD 1/14/22 2ND PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SD 11/19/21 PLANNING SUBMITTAL SET

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
RGA PROJECT NO:
19123.00
CAD FILE NAME:
19123-00-2A3-1
DRAWN BY:

CS
CHKID BY:

CS
COPYRIGHT: RGA, OFFICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SHEET TITLE
A3-1 - 1-i
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda
1017

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 1 of 25 ends

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
ON -GOING CONDITIONS/GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

PLANNING DIVISION (909) 797-2489 EXT. 224

1. This Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map is for the proposed development of light industrial logistics facility consisting of two concrete tilt -up buildings totaling approximately 2,054,801 square feet on an approximate 312.91 gross acres of land located at 32335 Live Oak Canyon Road within the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan. The Project Tentative Map will consist of seven (7) parcels (APN: 0301-191- 21, 0301-211-10, 0301-211-12, 0301-201-26, 0301-201-40, 0301-201-41 and 0301-201-42) with incorporation of roadway circulation improvements to accommodate for the construction of a 1,052,881 square foot warehouse (Parcel Lot 3), a 1,001,920 square foot warehouse (Parcel Lot 7), and additional truck parking (Parcel Lot 6). Facility operations are expected to occur 24 hours a day.

Any alteration or expansion or increase in the developed area of the site from that shown on the approved site plan, may require the submission of a new application or an additional application for Revisions for review and approval.

2. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding attacking or seeking to set aside, void or annul the approval of all or part of the matters applied for, or any other claim, action or proceeding relating to or arising out of such approval.

This obligation includes the obligation to reimburse the City, its agents, officers and employees for any court costs or attorney fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees are required by a court to pay as a result of such claim, action or proceeding. The City agrees to notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding promptly after the City becomes aware of it. The City may participate in the defense of the claim, action or proceeding, but such participation will not relieve the applicant of applicant's defense and indemnification obligations, including City expenses.

3. This Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Map and Oak Tree Removal Permit shall become null and void if all conditions have not been complied with and the occupancy or use of the land has not taken place within three (3) years of the date of approval. One extension of time, not to exceed three (3) years, may be granted upon written request and submittal of the appropriate fee not less than 30 days prior to the date of expiration. PLEASE NOTE: this will be the only notice given for the above specified expiration date. The applicant is responsible for the initiation of an extension request. Additional extensions of approval may be granted pursuant to the City's Development Code.
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1018

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 2 of 25 ends

4. The project applicant shall enter into a memorandum of understanding/cost share agreement to jointly fund an Environmental Impact Report and related CEQA studies for the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update to be completed by a qualified environmental consultant under contract with the City. The scope of work will include a program level environmental impact report as required to support the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan, as well as necessary project -specific analysis and studies related to the proposed Project, including those related to noise, air quality, as well as an analysis of traffic that includes Level of Service for compliance with the applicable General Plan policy. The Proposed Project's fair share cost in the memorandum of understanding/cost share agreement shall be in the minimum amount of $589,218.

5. The Project Applicant shall comply with all Mitigation Measures as identified in the Project -assigned Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP).

6. The applicant/owner shall pay the required Notice of Determination fees that are in effect during project approval pursuant to Senate Bill 1535. This fee shall be submitted to the Planning Division within three (3) days after the effective date of Conditional Use Permit approval, along with a $50.00 administrative handling fee required by the Clerk. Payments shall be made with a Check, Money Order or Cashier's Check in the total required amount, and shall be made payable to the "Clerk of the Board". The Planning Division shall then file the Notice of Determination within three (3) days after the effective date of conditional approval.

The applicant should be aware that Section 21089(b) of the Public Resources Code provides that any project approved under CEQA is not operative, vested or final until the required fee is paid. Proof of fee payment will be required prior to issuance of building permits.

7. All conditions of this Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Map and Oak Tree Removal Permit are continuing conditions. Failure of the applicant and/or operator to comply with any or all of said conditions at any time may result in the revocation of the permit granted to use the property.

8. The applicant/owner shall maintain in good condition at all times all permanent plantings as identified on the approved landscape plan.

9. All new utility lines shall be placed underground. Existing overhead distribution lines shall be placed underground when four (4) or more utility poles on the same street are located on or adjacent to the project site.

10. Mail delivery shall be of other delivery as approved by the U.S. Postal Service.

11. All signs proposed by this project may only be lit by steady, stationary, shielded light directed at the sign, by light inside the sign, by direct stationary neon lighting or by an alternating lighting system that changes no more than once per hour. The glare from the luminous source shall not exceed one-half (0.5) foot candle. 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1019

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 3 of 25 ends

12. Parking and on -site circulation requirements shall be maintained at all times.

A. All markings to include parking spaces, directional designations, "No Parking" designations, and "Fire Lane" designations shall be clearly defined and said markings shall be maintained in good condition at all times.

B. Parking and site circulation surfaces (City Road Specification #39) shall be maintained in good condition at all times.

13. Noise levels shall not exceed City Standards as required by Development Code Section 87.0905(b) Noise Standards.

14. All refuse generated at the facility shall at all times be stored in approved containers and shall be placed in a manner so that visual and public health nuisances are minimized.

15. All refuse containing garbage shall be removed from the premises at least two times per week in conformance with Municipal Code Section 8.24.030(B).

16. The applicant shall implement the approved "Solid Waste Recycling Plan" for any new commercial, industrial, or institutional uses located on the property. The developer and all occupants of the property shall make a good faith effort to fully comply with each component of the approved Plan. Any proposed revision to this Plan shall be subject to the review and approval of Yucaipa Disposal, Inc. (909) 797-9125.

17. The project site shall remain in full compliance with all City Sign Regulations at all times.

18. The applicant/property owner shall be required to apply an anti -graffiti coating to proposed block walls, and/or provide a landscape design of a type and nature that is acceptable to the City Planner, to any publicly viewable surfaces deemed by the City Planner to be likely to attract graffiti.

19. The applicant/property owner, and any and all successors in interest, shall for ten (10) years after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, provide the City with sufficient matching paint and/or anti -graffiti coating on demand for use in the painting over or removal of graffiti from any designated graffiti attracting surfaces.

20. New projects with a landscape area of 500 square feet or more shall comply with Sections 492.6(a)(3)(b) (c), (d) and (g) of the MWELO including the use of renewable organic waste products such as compost and mulch where applicable.

21. Projects rehabilitating an existing landscape area of 2,500 square feet or more shall comply with Sections 492.6(a)(3)(b) (c), (d) and (g) of the MWELO including the use of renewable organic waste products such as compost and mulch where applicable
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1020

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 4 of 25 ends

22. Compost and mulch made by the City's franchised hauler, Yucaipa Disposal, Inc. (909) 797-9125, or other designee from recovered organic waste products pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18993.1 shall take precedence over inorganic or virgin forest products when available locally.

23. The proposed Project is for a phased project. All conditions of approval shall apply to each phase as appropriate.

ENGINEERING DIVISION (909) 797-2489 EXT. 254

24. Preliminary WQMP shall be submitted for review. If project will not require a WQMP, documentation indicating a WQMP is not required shall be submitted.

25. Submit WQMP Plan for Approval.

26. Groundwater pollution from urban run-off generated by the project, including those from any new roadways, shall be mitigated using various structural and non- structural best management practices (BMPs), per the requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region and/or as indicated in the "New Development/Redevelopment Guidelines". All provisions of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) consistent with the 2010 MS4 permit and most recent regulatory mandates shall be met.

27. The natural drainage courses traversing the site shall not be occupied or obstructed. Compliance will be verified and met through the Water Quality Management Plan.

28. All lots must drain to streets, per the approved WQMP if applicable. If lots do not drain to streets, the cross lot drainage will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer under the provision of the Uniform Building Code Appendix 33 and the Development Code.

29. Applicant shall demonstrate that the site does not create concentrated discharges to adjacent properties and/or public right-of-way in excess of historical flows. If the project does create concentrated or sheet flows off -site that are greater than historical, the applicant shall demonstrate that the downstream facilities can accommodate flows; otherwise, applicant shall provide on -site detention for excess flows in accordance with the approved WQMP.

30. Live Oak Canyon Road shall be designed as a water -carrying street and its water carrying capacity shall be retained. Streets developed from Live Oak Canyon and/or Wildwood Canyon Road to access the project shall also be designed as a water -carrying street that meets the street design requirements of the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan.

31. Adequate elevations/geometry shall be provided on the entrance roads to the site at Live Oak Canyon Road to minimize the possibility of street flow entering the site. 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1021

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 5 of 25 ends

32. Lots adjacent to water -carrying streets shall be adequately elevated above the top of curb, or block walls provided, or both, to minimize the possibility of street flows entering lots.

33. Roads within this development shall be entered into the City Maintained Road System.

34. Road sections within and/or bordering the tract shall be designed and constructed with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks to City Road Standards, and in accordance with the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan circulation standards, and as shown on the entitlement plans. At intersections and driveways entering the street, the first 20 feet of slope shall not exceed 6%.

35. Final improvement plans and profiles shall indicate the location of any existing utility facility which would affect construction. Existing utility poles shall be shown on the improvement plans and relocated as necessary without cost to the City.

36. Slope rights shall be dedicated on the Final Parcel Map where necessary.

37. An approved type wall/barrier shall be required along the rear of double frontage lots and shall be constructed outside the public right-of-way.

38. Turn-arounds at dead-end streets shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Fire Marshall.

39. A thirty-five (35) foot radius curb return is required for the rounding the corner of the intersecting roads when the half -width right-of-way of any intersecting road is forty (40) feet or greater. A twenty (20) foot radius curb return is required for rounding corners of intersecting roads if the half -width right-of-way of all intersecting roads is less than forty (40) feet. At intersections, street dedication (right-of-way) shall be a corner cut-off from the point of curb return (PCR) to PCR of property line.

40. Road profile grades shall not be less than 0.5% unless the engineer at the time of submittal of the improvement plans provides justification to the satisfaction of the City Engineer confirming the adequacy of the grade.

41. Paved access is required from each parcel being created to a publicly maintained road. City street name signs shall be installed indicating street names and if publicly maintained or not.

42. Continuous water spaying or other approved methods must be used during grading operations to control fugitive dust.

43. Improvement plans for infrastructure adjacent to flood control facilities and storm drain improvement plans for drainage outlets into a San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) facility shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1022

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 6 of 25 ends

and submitted to the SBCFCD for review, approval and encroachment permit as required.

44. The applicant shall design and construct the intersection improvements, including roadway widening and associated traffic signal and striping modifications, at Live Oak Canyon Road and Outer Highway 10 as identified by the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan Update and Pacific Oaks Commerce Center Phase II. Should the City's Development Impact Fees be revised to include the intersection of Live Oak Canyon Road and Outer Highway 10 prior to construction of Phase II of the proposed development, payment of the revised Development Impact Fees could replace the requirement to construct intersection improvements.

45. Pursuant to the Yucaipa Municipal Code, developer shall reimburse the City for the developer's fair share of the City's costs, as determined by the City Engineer, for the City's cost to construct the Low Water Crossing Replacement Bridge and Street Improvements from the north property line of the development site and to the proposed bridge improvements as required by any City Approved Capital Improvement Project and/or any requirements as they relate to the required roadway improvements.

CDF FIRE DEPARTMENT (909) 797-2489 EXT. 246

46. This project is protected by the Yucaipa Fire Department / CalFire. Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the Fire Marshall for verification of current fire protection development requirements. All new construction shall comply with the adopted Uniform Fire Code and all applicable statutes, codes, ordinances, standards and policies of the Yucaipa Fire Department/CalFire.

47. This project is in Fire Safety Review Area 2. This is a high fire hazard brush area.

This project shall comply with the construction and development standards for a FR-2 Area. Contact the City Building & Safety Division for FR-2 Area construction and development standards.

48. Fire Department access roads and/or public/private streets shall meet the Fire Department minimum width standard of twenty-four (24) feet. Access roads shall be paved (asphalt/concrete) and in place prior to placement of combustible material on site. Fire Department minimum paving thickness shall be no less than four (4) inches. This standard shall not lessen other agency requirements.

49. Fire Department access roads and/or public/private streets and residential driveways shall have a minimum vertical clearance of thirteen (13) feet and six (6) inches.
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1023

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUPlTPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 7 of 25 ends

50. Fire Department access roadways and/or public/private streets and driveways shall not exceed 12% grade (please note: Engineering Division requirements may be more restrictive).

51. Cul-de-sacs shall not exceed six hundred (600) feet in total length, unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department.

52. Required fire flow for this project, as determined by I.S.O. Formula, is as follows:

GPM = 8,000, at 20 psi residual; for 4 hour duration A reduction in the required fire flow rate may be allowed per the exceptions specified in the California Fire Code. System shall be looped with minimum eight (8) inch mains; six (6) inch laterals; six (6) inch risers; six (6) inch diameter hydrants with one 2'/2" outlet and one 4" outlet.

53. Approved fire hydrants capable of supplying required fire flow shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities, buildings or portions of buildings are constructed or moved within the jurisdiction. When any portion of the facility or building protected is in excess of 400 feet from a fire hydrant on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional fire hydrants meeting the required fire flow shall be provided.

54. Fire hydrants shall be installed at locations to be determined by the California Fire Code (2022) Appendix "C". Required fire flow to be determined by the California Fire Code (2022) Appendix "B". Minimum fire flow shall not be less than 8,000 gpm (exceptions not applied).

THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO
RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:

ENGINEERING DIVISION (909) 797-2489 EXT. 254

55. A preliminary soils report shall be filed with and approved by the City Engineer.

56. A geology report, prepared by a Licensed Engineering Geologist, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Details of the requirements are provided in the City's Grading Manual.

57. Adequate provisions shall be made to intercept and conduct the off -site tributary drainage flow around or through the site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties.

58. Adequate City Drainage Easements (minimum fifteen (15) feet wide) shall be provided over the natural drainage courses and /or drainages facilities, including WQMP identified BMP areas. The easements shall be designed to contain the 100- year frequency storm flow plus bulking and freeboard per City Standard Criteria. 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1024

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 8 of 25 ends

Flowage easements or City Drainage Easements shall be obtained where diversion or concentration of runoff from the site or drainage facilities dewaters onto private property.

59. Detention basins shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the criteria set forth in the City Detention Basin Policy and the approved WQMP. All work shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.

60. Should the use of detention basins be determined not appropriate in this case, the applicant shall design an alternate method , approved by the City Engineer

61. The WQMP shall be approved and the developer shall provide a financial mechanism for the maintenance of the detention basins which shall be set in place and approved by the City Engineer. The WQMP maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded by the applicant.

62. The major natural drainage course(s) traversing the site shall be delineated on the final map. Adequate easements and building setback lines should be designed, offered and dedicated on the Final Map as "City Easements". Survey data regarding top of bank and/or channel cross -sections shall be provided to the Engineering Division.

63. Permanent drainage improvements are required, per the appropriate Master Plan Drainage, to intercept and conduct the larger flows through or around the site in an approved manner. For the sizing of roadway storm drains and locations of catch basins in streets the streets the storm drain system shall be designed to:

A. Collect a 25-year storm recurrence interval within the street section (top of curb to top of curb).

B. Collect and contain the 100-year interval within the roadway right-of- way.

C. Applicant shall verify that downstream facilities, and drainage channels accepting site flows are not adversely affected by the increased cfs.

64. The proposed storm drain facilities shall intercept and provide for collection of runoff generated on -site (and off -site flows that drain onsite). All facilities shall be designed in accordance with current City policy and requirements including applicable Development Code Sections (pertaining to Flood Plain Safety Overlay Districts). Final facility design and location must be approved prior to recordation of Final Maps. All on -site storm drain facilities shall be designed to convey flows which could be expected from a storm with a 10-year recurrence interval with additional design factors of safety and freeboard to provide a 100-year level of flood protection to inhabited structures. During storms of intensity greater than the 10-year storm, additional flood protection shall be provided by utilizing the local storm drain system and conveying additional runoff onto streets. Storm drain 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1025

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 9 of 25 ends

facilities which intercept canyon flows upstream of development area shall be designed to convey the 100-year rather than 10-year design flow.

65. In addition to the drainage, traffic related, or other requirements stated herein, other "on -site" or "off -site" improvements may be required which cannot be determined from tentative plans at this time and would have to be reviewed after more complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to the City Engineer.

66. A Registered Civil Engineer shall investigate and design adequate drainage facilities to intercept and conduct the drainage flows around or through the site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties.

67. A thorough evaluation of the structural road section, to include parkway improvements, from a qualified materials engineer, shall be submitted to the Engineering Division.

68. Existing City roads which will require reconstruction shall remain open for traffic at all times, with adequate detours, during actual construction. A cash deposit may be required to cover the cost of grading and paving prior to recordation of the map.

Upon completion of the grading and paving to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division, the cash deposit will be refunded.

69. Trees, irrigation system, and landscaping required to be installed on public right- of-way within this project area shall be maintained by other than the City, with the exception of Landscape & Lighting Maintenance District areas, and shall be as specified in City standards for tree planting. Maintenance procedures acceptable to the Engineering Division shall be instituted.

70. All required public road and drainage improvements shall be bonded in accordance with the Development Code and City Bonding Policy unless constructed and approved prior to recordation.

71. In the event applicant fails to acquire the required off -site property interests, the developer shall at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the applicant of all costs incurred by the City to acquire off -site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the applicant, at the applicant's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.

72. The applicant shall submit road improvement plans to the Engineering Division and bond for those improvements with the City.
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1026

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 10 of 25 ends

73. Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and 44 feet of paving shall be installed on proposed collector streets, 64 feet of paving shall be installed on proposed arterial streets.

Plans for all improvements must be approved by the Engineering Division, prior to installation of said improvements. A cash deposit or surety bond may be placed to fulfill this requirement.

74. The applicant shall provide proof of legal and physical access to the proposed subdivision. As proof of access, the applicant shall submit one of the following.. (a) existing dedication; (b) copy of the court decree establishing prescriptive rights that is acceptable to the City Engineer; (c) dedications by separate instrument from all property owners intervening between the proposed land division and the City Maintained Road System.

75. Right-of-way and improvements (including off -site) to transition traffic and drainage flows from proposed to existing shall be required as necessary.

76. Slope stability tests are required for road cuts or road fills in excess of a 2.1 slope.

77. A Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor shall be retained to design the proposed road alignment to the approval of the City Engineer. A contour map at sufficient intervals to determine existing topography (not to exceed five feet) prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer or a Licensed Land Surveyor shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer delineating the alignment and grade of the proposed access roads designed to City standards.

78. Applicant shall present evidence to the City Engineer that he has obtained a non- interference letter from any utility company that may have rights of easement within the property boundaries.

79. Easements of record not shown on the tract/parcel map shall be relinquished or relocated. Lots affected by proposed easements or easements of record, which cannot be relinquished or relocated, shall be redesigned.

80. Any off -site grading easements shall be obtained and these areas shall be contour graded.

81. Applicant shall provide for street lighting within the development as per adopted City standards and per Improvement Level requirements.

THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT:

PLANNING DIVISION (909) 797-2489 EXT. 224

82. The Project Applicant shall comply with all Mitigation Measures as identified in the Project -assigned Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP). 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1027

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 11 of 25 ends

BUILDING AND SAFETY - LANDSCAPE REVIEW (909) 797-2489 EXT. 284

83. Grading permits shall not be issued for any areas to be graded and remain undeveloped until a revegetation plan is approved by the Landscape Architect through the Building and Safety Permit submittal process, and until bonds are posted for revegetation.

ENGINEERING DIVISION (909) 797-2489 EXT. 254

84. Applicant shall submit a Notice of Intent and comply with the requirements of the General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board if the project site is one (1) acre or greater.

85. An on -site grading monitor shall be required in accordance with Development Code Section 87.1010 for all grading operations.

86. Prior to the alteration of any wetland habitats, the required permits or authorized clearance shall be obtained from the Department of Fish and Game in accordance with the Section 1600 et seq. of the State Fish and Game Code, from the United States Army Corps of Engineers in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region in accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.

87. The applicant shall provide documentation indicating that the WQMP, grading plan, erosion control plan and landscape plan are consistent with each other. The documentation shall indicate that each document has been reviewed by the applicant for consistency.

88. The applicant's plans indicate approximately 32% of the site to be improved with impervious surfaces. Design features shall be included to direct storm water run- off flows into landscaped pervious areas before any run-off flows into public rights - of -way.

89. Prior to signing of the improvement plans, any proposed grading within the road right-of-way shall be done under the direction of a Soils Testing Engineer, hired by the applicant. Compaction tests of embankment construction, trench backfill, and all subgrades shall be performed at no cost to the City. Prior to placement of any base materials, and/or paving, a written report shall be submitted by the applicant's engineer to the City Engineer for review and approval.

90. For any construction within City owned right-of-way, an encroachment permit, or authorized clearance, shall be obtained by the applicant from the Engineering Division. Encroachment permits are not required for grading activities contained wholly within the Project property.

91. For any construction within State owned right-of-way, an encroachment permit shall be obtained, by the applicant, from CALTRANS.
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1028

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 12 of 25 ends

92. In the event construction is required in established flood overflow areas, structures shall be elevated above the determined flood stage levels in an approved manner which will neither impede nor deflect flood flows.

93. Visible slopes shall utilize contour grading with undulating slopes to create a naturalistic appearance as the landscaping planting matures.

BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION (909) 797-2489 EXT. 263

94. Three (3) copies of the grading plan shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval. A copy of the grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division when graded slopes exceed five (5) feet in height. All on - site cut and fill slopes shall:

A. Be a part of the downhill lot when between individual lots, or as approved by the City Planner and City Engineer.

B. Incorporate recommendations of the approved geology and soils reports.

C. Be contour graded to blend with existing natural contours.

D. Be limited to a maximum slope ratio of two -to -one (2:1) and a maximum vertical height of thirty (30) feet. Setbacks from the top and bottoms of slopes shall be a minimum of one-half (1/2) the slope height or per CBC.

E. Preclude damage to the site and downstream properties during heavy storm run-off, especially during the construction stage by including a stringent slope, erosion, and sediment control program on the proposed grading plan.

Any such damage allowed to occur will be the responsibility of the applicant.

F. All open space easements and natural /undisturbed open space shall be indicated as ungraded areas not to be disturbed.

THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT:

PLANNING DIVISION (909) 797-2489 EXT. 224

95. The Project Applicant shall comply with all Mitigation Measures as identified in the Project -assigned Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP).

96. The enrollment of the Yucaipa Joint Unified School District is severely impacted by new development. To mitigate the impact of this project, developer shall pay such taxes as are required by the Yucaipa Joint Unified School District Community 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1029

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 13 of 25 ends

Facilities District No. 1, and any other fees assessed by Government Code Section 53080, and 65995-65997.

97. The City of Yucaipa has implemented development impact fees for various infrastructure and capital facilities needs generated by new development. These fees will provide for various capital facilities including, but not limited to, roads, parks, flood control and drainage, public facilities, and fire fighting facilities. This project shall be subject to all such development impact fees which are in effect at the time building permits are issued.

98. Provide plans for conceptual landscaping, fencing, floorplans and detailed building elevations including materials, finishes and colors for all units for Planning Commission review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.

99. The applicant/owner shall process a Condition Compliance Review through the City for verification of conditions prior to the issuance of building permits. 100. Water service shall be provided by Yucaipa Valley Water District. The Yucaipa Valley Water District letter containing preliminary service project requirements and dated August 29, 2022, is included as a Condition of Approval. Submit evidence of service to Building and Safety at time of Condition Compliance review. 101. Sewage disposal shall be by Yucaipa Valley Water District. The Yucaipa Valley Water District letter containing preliminary service project requirements and dated August 29, 2022, is included as a Condition of Approval. Submit evidence of service to Building and Safety at time of Condition Compliance review. 102. A Development Agreement will need to be fully executed by the Yucaipa Valley Water District and the Applicant/Developer prior to the issuance of any building permit.
103. The applicant shall submit a "Solid Waste Recycling Plan" for review and approval.

This Plan shall address two (2) principal recycling programs: 1) the recycling of construction waste/debris during the development phase of the project, and 2) the recycling of the solid waste that is generated daily by each proposed use during the operational phase of the project. The construction waste component shall include: complete information on the individual or firm that will be responsible for implementing the recycling plan; complete information on all proposed recycling facilities that will receive waste products; and estimates of the volume or weight of each type of material that will be recycled. The operational waste component shall include: complete information on the location, access, sizes, and numbers of solid waste and recycling bins needed to serve each proposed use that is located within the project. For information on the types of waste disposal services that are available, you may contact Yucaipa Disposal, Inc. at (909) 797-9125 for assistance.
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1030

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 14 of 25 ends

104. Proof of fee payment of Fish and Game fees and/or County Administrative handling fees pursuant to California State Assembly Bill 3158 shall be submitted. 105. Provide detailed building elevations including materials, finishes, colors, and signage for all buildings for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Building elevations shall be consistent with those approved by the Planning Commission.
106. The applicant/property owner shall grant to the City, in writing, the irrevocable right of entry over, and access to, such property, upon twenty-four (24) hours' posted notice, by authorized City employees or agents, for the purpose of removing or painting over graffiti on any designated graffiti attracting surfaces. 107. Project shall comply with the Design Standards of the Freeway Corridor Specific Plan, the Development Code and objective design requirements from the City's Design Guidelines.

BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION (909) 797-2489 EXT. 263
108. This project will require one or more building permits. Permits will require a complete permit application and complete building plans to be submitted for approval prior to commencement of work.
109. New commercial construction or additions resulting in more than 30% of the floor area shall include readily accessible storage areas identified for the collection of materials consistent with the City's four -container collection system which includes trash, recycling, green waste, and food waste containers. 110. The site shall be developed in compliance with all current model codes. All plans shall be designed in compliance with the latest editions of the California Building Codes, California Energy Codes, California Accessibility Codes, and Yucaipa Municipal Codes as adopted by the City of Yucaipa.
111. Where applicable, site development and grading shall be designed to provide access to all entrances and exterior ground floor exits and access to normal paths of travel, and where necessary to provide access. Paths of travel shall incorporate (but not limited to) exterior stairs, landings, walks and sidewalks, pedestrian ramps, curb ramps, warning curbs, detectable warnings, signage, gates, lifts and walking surface material. The accessible route(s) of travel shall be the most practical direct route between accessible building entrances, site facilities, accessible parking, public sidewalks, and the accessible entrance(s) to the site. California Building Code (CBC) 11A and 11 B.
a. City of Yucaipa enforces the State of California provisions of the California Building Code disabled access requirements. The Federal ADA standards differ in some cases from the California State requirements. It is the 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1031

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 15 of 25 ends

building owner's responsibility to be aware of those differences and comply accordingly.
b. Disabled access parking shall be located on the shortest accessible route.

Relocate parking spaces accordingly.
112. Where applicable, structures on the site shall be accessible per California Building Code (CBC) 11 B.
113. Separate submittals and permits are required for all accessory structures such as but not limited to, trash enclosures, patios, block walls and storage buildings. 114. Pursuant to California Business and Professions Code Section 6737, this project is required to be designed by a California licensed architect or engineer. 115. The perimeter of the jobsite, adjacent to any public right-of-way, shall have a properly installed, 6' high, construction fence with privacy cloth attached. The fencing and cloth shall be maintained and kept in good condition until such a time that the project has been completed, or a permanent perimeter wall is in place. All construction entrances/exits shall be approved in advance by city personnel.

BUILDING AND SAFETY - LANDSCAPE REVIEW (909) 797-2489 EXT. 284 116. Three copies of a Landscape Documentation Package shall be submitted for Building & Safety Division review and approval. Building Permits shall not be issued until Landscape Documentation has been approved. Said Landscape Documentation Package shall be consistent with the requirements of Chapter 4, of Division 10, of the Development Code and include all of the following elements:

A. Project Information
(1) Date
(2) Project Applicant
(3) Project Address (if available, parcel and/or lot number(s)) (4) Total Landscape Area (square feet)
(5) Project Type (e.g., new, rehabilitated, public, private, cemetery, homeowner -installed)
(6) Water Supply Type (e.g., potable, recycled, well) and identify the local retail water purveyor if the applicant is not served by a private well
(7) Checklist of All Documents in Landscape Documentation Package 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1032

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 16 of 25 ends

(8) Project Contacts (to include contact information for the project applicant and property owner)
(9) Applicant Signature and Date (with statement, "I agree to comply with the requirements of the water efficient landscape ordinance and submit a complete Landscape Documentation Package").
(B) Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet
(1) Hydrozone Information Table
(2) Water Budget Calculations
(1) Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA)
(II) Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU)
(C) Soil Management Report
(D) Landscape Design Plan
(E) Irrigation Design Plan
(F) Grading Design Plan
(G) Certification of Substantial Completion (to be submitted after installation of the project).

A copy of the approved Landscape Documentation Package shall be provided to the property owner or site manager along with the record drawings and any other information normally forwarded to the property owner or site manager. A copy of the Water Conservation Concept Statement and the Certificate of Substantial Completion shall be sent by the project manager to the local retail water purveyor. 117. Landscape document package shall include the method of permanent maintenance of approved landscaping shall be identified as to responsibility and schedule.
118. Three (3) copies of a landscape and irrigation plan prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect for the planting (drought tolerant landscaping shall be utilized to minimize water consumption) and permanent irrigation system for the development, including setback areas and parkways, shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Division for review and approval. Building Permits shall not be issued until Landscape Documentation has been approved. Said plans must 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1033

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 17 of 25 ends

be consistent with the City of Yucaipa Landscape Design and Installation Guidelines and include the following details:

A. Voltage boxes, mailboxes, trash enclosures, maintenance structures, backflow devices, automatic controls, air conditioning/heating units, etc., to be shown on the plan and screened with landscaping and/or decorative fencing/trim.

B. A permanent automatically -controlled irrigation system.

C. Landscaping shall consist of drought tolerant vegetation appropriate to the local climate. Trees, shrubs and ground covers in the following quantities shall be required as follows:

1. Compost
Compost at a rate of a minimum of 4 cubic yards per 1,000 square feet of permeable area shall be incorporated to a depth of six (6) inches into the soil. Soils with greater than six percent (6%) organic matter in the top six (6) inches of soil are exempt from adding Compost and tilling.

2. Tree planting (15 gallon size):
a. 1 for each 600 sq. ft. of total landscaped
area (one required, minimum);
b. 80% of total trees required to be 15 gallon;
C. 1 for every 12 parking stalls;

3. 24 to 96 inch box trees:
a. 20% of total trees required (one required, minimum).

4. Tree Spacing/location:
a. small trees: 20 feet O.C. max.;
b. large trees: 30 feet O.C. max.;
C. street trees: 15 gal. min./30 feet O.C. max.;
d. min. 6 feet from curbs, paving and sidewalks;
trees in parkway between sidewalk and curb
shall be provided with a linear root barrier.

5. 5 gallon shrubs:
a. 60% of total shrubs required to be 5 gallon;
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1034

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 18 of 25 ends

b. 10 for each 300 sq. ft. of landscaped area.

6. 1 gallon shrubs:
a. 40% of total shrubs required.

7. Ground Cover:
a. Drought tolerant adapted when mature, or native;
b. Maximum spacing: 12 inches O.C., or as suitable for planting material;
C. Hydroseeding (establish recommended mixture); specify weight or volume per unit area.

8. Mulch:
a. Apply a minimum three- (3-) inch layer of mulch on all exposed soil surfaces of planting areas except in turf areas, creeping or rooting groundcovers, or direct seeding applications where mulch is contraindicated. To provide habitat for beneficial insects and other wildlife, leave up to five percent (5%) of the landscape area without mulch. Designated insect habitat must be included in the landscape design plan as such.

D. Parking/vehicular circulation areas screened with landscaped berms adjacent to streets.

E. Landscape detail of trash enclosures, to be located within 200 ft. of building pad.

F. All walls and fences shall be shown, at the top of slope (if applicable), with the style, design, materials, and colors indicated.

G. Design features to direct storm water run-off into landscaped pervious areas to achieve percolation into the ground before run-off flows reach the public rig ht-of-way.

H. Detector -check valve assembly screening and camouflage, which shall include landscaped berms and/or depressions, shrub screening, and the painting of the equipment to match the landscaping. The height of the equipment shall not exceed the minimum ground clearance established by the applicable code. It is not permitted to be located within the front yard building setback area, unless otherwise approved by City Inspector.

New Oak Trees shall be planted pursuant to the City's Oak Tree policy. 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1035

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 19 of 25 ends

119. New projects with a landscape area of 500 square feet or more shall comply with Sections 492.6(a)(3)(b) (c), (d) and (g) of the MWELO including the use of renewable organic waste products such as compost and mulch where applicable. 120. Projects rehabilitating an existing landscape area of 2,500 square feet or more shall comply with Sections 492.6(a)(3)(b) (c), (d) and (g) of the MWELO including the use of renewable organic waste products such as compost and mulch where applicable
121. Compost and mulch made by the City's franchised hauler, Yucaipa Disposal, Inc. (909) 797-9125, or other designee from recovered organic waste products pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18993.1 shall take precedence over inorganic or virgin forest products when available locally.

CDF FIRE DEPARTMENT (909) 797-2489 EXT. 246
122. A greenbelt or fuel modification zone plan shall be required and bonded for this project. Fuel modification plan requirements shall be site specific to this project.

The applicant shall submit a fuel modification plan to the Fire Department for review and comments or approval. Maintenance provisions of the fuel modification zone shall be approved by the Fire Department. Maintenance of the fuel modification zone, located in designated open space, and enforcement of the fuel modification zone, within the property of individual property owners, shall be the responsibility of a homeowners' association or other approved maintenance authority that is acceptable to the Fire Department.
123. Three sets of water delivery system plans, designed to meet the required fire flow for this project and/or development shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval.
124. Applicant -developer shall provide the Fire Department with a letter from the water company serving the project -development, verifying that financial arrangements have been made and bonds posted for the required Fire Department approved water improvements.
125. Prior to any construction, the entire fuel modification zone required and approved by the Fire Department shall be completed. Any phased implementation of the fuel modification zone shall be done only with prior approval of the Fire Department.
126. A fuel break of one hundred (100) feet (brush and weed clearance) is required prior to construction. The clearance shall be maintained on a year-round basis. 127. An additional fuel modification zone of 100 feet shall be provided on all side(s) of the proposed structure(s). Fuels in this zone are to be thinned and/or removed or 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1036

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 20 of 25 ends

otherwise modified to provide a reasonable level of fire defense protection to the proposed structure(s).
128. Fire hydrants shall be installed and operational as per approved water system delivery plans prior to any framing, construction, or delivery of combustible materials to project site. Concrete forms are not considered combustible materials. 129. An alternative type of construction providing a higher level of fire resistance is required. Contact the Fire Department or City Building Official for more information.
130. The project shall implement the mitigation measures listed in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program adopted for the project.

SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED AND/OR USED FOR

PURPOSES APPLIED FOR UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS
HAVE BEEN MET:

PLANNING DIVISION (909) 797-2489 EXT. 224
131. Parking and on -site circulation requirements shall be provided for as identified on the approved site plan.
132. All access drives and parking areas shall be surfaced with a minimum of 2 inches of asphalt concrete surfacing, City Road Specification No. 39, which shall be appropriately striped to accommodate safe vehicular circulation. 133. All access drives shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide to facilitate two-way traffic. 134. Any lights used to illuminate the site shall be hooded and designed so as to reflect away from adjoining properties and public thoroughfares. Additional design elements shall be employed to incorporate dark sky principles in order to minimize up lighting and unnecessary light exposure outside of the facility operations. 135. Developers of commercial/industrial/institutional projects shall submit a report detailing the percentage of project costs spent in the City of Yucaipa. At a minimum, this report shall contain a list of local businesses/individuals that have been solicited for bids and/or received contracts for materials or services. 136. Developers of commercial, industrial, or institutional projects shall submit all applicable documentation that is required to verify the volume of weight of each type of construction waste or debris that has been recycled or otherwise disposed of in a lawful manner.
137. Developers shall ensure that they recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste. 138. All roof top mechanical equipment is to be screened from ground vistas. 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1037

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 21 of 25 ends

139. The Project Applicant shall comply with all Mitigation Measures as identified in the Project -assigned Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP).

ENGINEERING DIVISION (909) 797-2489 EXT. 254
140. Construction of private roads and private road related drainage improvements shall be inspected and certified by the City Engineer.
141. All required road and drainage improvements shall be completed. 142. Projects subject to a building permit shall have all required on and off -site improvements, required for each phase, completed and approved prior to final inspection of any buildings or structures. The term "phase" as used here shall mean the following: "The block of building permits drawn on less than the whole project" or "A plan of building construction which indicates blocks of construction of less than the whole project." In each phase the installation of any on or off -site improvements shall be sufficiently completed so as to assure protection from storm or drainage run off, a safe and driveable access for fire and safety, and the ordinary and intended use of buildings or structures. The Building Official, with the concurrence of the City Engineer, may approve any plan or approve a change to an approved plan, which complies with the intent of this policy. 143. Developer shall be required to place construction traffic control in public right-of- way during the construction of off -site improvements. Traffic control devices shall be maintained 24 hours a day 7 days a week as directed by the City Engineer. 144. The Applicant shall submit the signed original Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Certification form to verify consistency of the BPMs shown on the as -built grading plans and landscape plans. In case of inconsistency, the Applicant shall revise the WQMP to match the as -built plans.

CDF FIRE DEPARTMENT (909) 797-2489 EXT. 246
145. Fire Department access roadways and/or public/private streets exceeding one hundred fifty (150) feet in length shall have a Fire Department approved turn- around at the terminus (cul-de-sac). Minimum radius shall be not less than 48 feet. 146. Fire Department access roadways and/or public/private streets and driveways shall extend to within one hundred fifty (150) feet of and shall give reasonable access to all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. An access road, approved by the Fire Department, shall be provided to within fifty (50) feet of all structures when the natural grade between access road and structure is in excess of 30%. Where an approved access road cannot be provided, a fire protection system shall be required and approved by the Fire Department. 147. The development and/or project, and each phase thereof, shall have a minimum of two (2) remote points of access, including a secondary access, for fire and other 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1038

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 22 of 25 ends

emergency equipment and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations.
148. The public and/or private roadways serving this project shall be named. 149. Street name signs shall be installed with approved names. 150. Manual operated gates across Fire Department access roadways, public and/or private streets and driveways, shall be equipped with approved emergency key - operated ("Knox" type) locks. For automatic gates, a "Knox" keyed emergency access switch shall be installed at location determined by Fire Department, and shall over -ride all command functions and open gate automatically upon activation.

All automatic gates shall have a manual over -ride for use during loss of electric power. "Knox box" request forms are available from the Fire Department. 151. Address numbers shall be placed on all new and existing commercial and multi- family residential structures in such a manner as to be plainly visible and legible from the access roadway or street. Structures shall have numbers of 8" height, 3/8" stroke on contrasting background. Address numbers shall be illuminated so as to be visible and legible from access roadway or street. Industrial occupancies shall have address numbers of 12" height, 1/2" stroke and shall be illuminated so as to be visible and legible from access roadway or street. Where structure setback exceeds one hundred (100) feet from the access roadway or street, additional non - illuminated numbers are 6" in height, 3/8" stroke, on contrasting background shall be displayed at property access entrance.
152. "No Parking - Fire Lane" signs shall be posted at locations designated by Fire Marshall. Fire lane curbs shall be painted red with white letters stating "No Parking — Fire Lane".
153. On site fire hydrants capable of supplying required fire flow shall be installed at locations identified by the Fire Marshall. System shall be looped with minimum eight (8) inch mains; six (6) inch laterals; six (6) inch risers; six (6) inch diameter hydrants with one 2'/2" outlet and one 4" outlet.
154. Approved fire hydrant pavement markers shall be installed. 155. Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed according to NFPA 13 and Fire Department requirements. Submit three (3) sets of shop plans with material cut sheets and hydraulic calculations, indicating the type of occupancy, type of materials to be stored (if any), for Fire Department review and approval prior to any installation. Submit copy of California C-16 license. 156. Automatic fire sprinkler control devices (P.I.V. & O.S.&Y.) shall be visible from Fire Department access roadway, and identify system being controlled and address of structure. Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located no closer than fifty (50) feet and not to exceed one hundred fifty (150) feet from structure. Required 09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1039

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 23 of 25 ends

fire hydrant shall have a maximum distance from FDC of thirty (30) feet. FDC shall identify address and system of structure being protected. 157. A minimum of one 2A-10BC fire extinguisher shall be installed for each 3,000 sq. ft. of floor area. Travel distance to any one fire extinguisher shall not exceed 75 feet. Additional fire extinguishers, size and class to be determined by Fire Department, may be required. Fire extinguishers shall be serviced annually and shall have a current sfm service tag attached.
158. An automatic fire detection and alarm system meeting the requirements of UFC Article 10, CBC and NFPA 72 shall be installed. Three (3) sets of shop plans with material cut sheets and calculations shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation.
159. Dependent on occupancy type and load, an automatic smoke removal system shall be installed. The system shall comply with the UFC and CBC requirements. Three (3) sets of shop plans with material cut sheets and calculations shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. 160. Dependent on occupancy type and load, an automatic smoke ventilation system — fusible link type, shall be installed. Roof vent, venting ratios and draft curtains shall be provided. Three (3) sets of shop plans with material cut sheets and calculations shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation.
161. High Fire Hazard Areas FR-1 & FR-2: one -hour fire resistive construction is required for exterior walls. Contact Fire Marshall or City Building Official for more information.
162. The main electrical panel and all sub -panels shall be labeled on inside cover for all circuits.
163. Water heater (fuel fired) shall be properly vented to exterior of structure. Water heater shall be seismic strapped to wall and be located 18" above a garage floor. 164. Commercial and industrial structures/occupancies and gated complexes shall have a "knox box" system installed on the exterior of the buildings or complex.

Location of device to be determined by the Fire Department. The box shall contain keys necessary to gain access and may contain pre -plans and msds information as required by the Fire Department.
165. Commercial exit requirements:

A. Required exit doors shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times.

B. Required exit doors shall swing outward and away in the direction of exil travel.
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1040

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 24 of 25 ends

C. Obstructions shall not be placed in the required width of an exit. Exits shall not be blocked or locked shut or obstructed in any manner during business hours.

D. Exit paths shall be illuminated when structure is occupied.

E. Exit path illumination shall be supplied from two (2) sources of power when occupant load is one hundred (100) persons or more.

F. When exit way/exit pathway and/or exit doorway is not easily identified, additional exit signs shall be installed.

G. Exit signs shall be internally or externally illuminated by two lamps or shall be of the self -luminous type.
166. All flammable and combustible liquid storage and dispensing shall be in accordance with applicable sections of the UFC Article 79 and City codes and ordinances. Plan review and annual permit to operate from the Fire Department is required.
167. Address numbers shall be provided along the roofs of the warehouse structures to aid aerial police and fire support personnel the ability to locate each site. 168. Commercial and industrial buildings in excess of 20,000 square feet and with an interior area more than 150 feet from exterior exit, shall be equipped with a Class I standpipe system or as needed to meet California Fire Code Section 905.

Standpipe connections shall be configured to reach any portion of interior space within 150 feet in any direction of travel or as needed to meet California Fire Code Section 905. This system shall be calculated to provide 500 gpm from an adjacent automatic fire sprinkler riser at 100 psi nozzle pressure for two hand lines flowing. 169. To ensure that the construction of the proposed structures does not impact the Yucaipa Fire Department's Insurance Services Office (ISO) rating, applicant shall pay to the City approximately half of the cost of a ladder truck fire apparatus (with associated equipment) in the amount of $490,000 to be used by the City to assist with the purchase of the ladder truck.

BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION (909) 797-2489 EXT. 263
170. The building(s) shall meet all handicapped requirements. 171. The building(s) shall comply with all structural and non structural provisions of the California Building Code.
172. The building(s) shall meet all exiting requirements of Chapters 10 and 11 of the California Building Code.
173. Any change of occupancy will require submission of plans for approval to Building and Safety. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the local Building and Safety Division for a pre -construction inspection prior to occupancy of the building(s).
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1041

Pacific Oaks Industrial LLC
Case No. 21-196 CUP/TPM - Conditions of Approval

Page 25 of 25 ends

174. The building(s) or structure(s) shall meet all applicable requirements of the adopted model codes and amendments.

BUILDING AND SAFETY - LANDSCAPE REVIEW (909) 797-2489 EXT. 284 175. All landscaping and irrigation shown on the approved landscape and irrigation plans and all required walls shall be completed. Applicant shall provide the City with a Certificate of Substantial Completion from the certified professional that prepared the approved landscape and irrigation plans.
176. Developers of residential development projects greater than a single dwelling unit, commercial properties and multi -family dwellings shall submit a report, including invoices or proof of recovered organic waste product procurement (either through purchase or acquisition) pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18993.1, and submit records to the City's designee. Records shall include the source of product, including name, physical location, and contact information for each entity, operation, or facility from whom the recovered organic waste products were procured, type of product, quantity of product in tons or yards, invoice or other record demonstrating procurement.

END OF CONDITIONS
09/23/2024 City Council Agenda 1042

Yucaipa City CouncilSeptember 23, 2024

Yucaipa City Council
September 23, 2024