Anaheim City Council
April 16, 2024

Planning and Building Department
4 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM 5.1-12 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, all air conditioning facilities and other roof and ground-mounted equipment shall be shown on plans as shielded from public view and the sound buffered to comply with City of Anaheim noise ordinances from any adjacent residential or transientoccupied properties. A note indicating that these improvements shall be installed prior to final building and zoning inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.1-13 Prior to Final Site Plan
approval
Prior to Final Site Plan approval, plans shall show that the rear elevations of buildings visible from off-site areas shall be architecturally accented to portray a finished look.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.1-14 Prior to Final Site Plan
approval
Prior to Final Site Plan approval, plans shall show that no shuttle/bus/vehicular drop-off areas shall be permitted in hotel/motel or vacation resort front setback area.

Planning and Building Department
AIR QUALITYMM 5.2-1 Ongoing during project
operation
Ongoing during project operation, the property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce emissions to the extent practical, schedule goods movements for off-peak traffic hours, and use clean fuel for vehicles and other equipment, as practicable.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.2-2 Prior to the issuance of
each building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence that low emission paints and coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings, in compliance with SCAQMD regulations. The information shall be denoted on the project plans and specifications. The property owner/developer shall submit an architectural coating schedule and calculations demonstrating that VOC emissions from architectural coating operations would not exceed 75 pounds per day averaged over biweekly periods. The calculations shall show, for each coating, the surface area to be coated, gallons (or liters) of coating per unit surface area, and VOC content per gallon (or liter). The property owner/developer shall also implement the following to limit emissions from architectural coatings and asphalt usage:

Planning and Building Department
5 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
a. Use non-solvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate; b. Use solvent-based coatings, where they are necessary.

MM 5.2-3 Ongoing during
construction
Ongoing during construction, the property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce construction-related air quality impacts. These measures shall include, but are not limited to:
a. Normal wetting procedures (at least twice daily) or other dust palliative measures shall be followed during earth-moving operations to minimize fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code including application of chemical soil stabilizers to exposed soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover in disturbed areas as quickly as practicable. b. For projects where there is excavation for subterranean facilities (such as parking) on-site haul roads shall be watered at least every two hours or the on-site haul roads shall be paved. c. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approved soil binders, according to manufacturer’s specification, to exposed piles. d. Roadways adjacent to the project shall be swept and cleared of any spilled export materials at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust; and, haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of materials exported from the project site occur.
e. Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the project site. f. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall be covered prior to entering public streets.
g. Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not carry dirt on tires onto public streets, including treating onsite roads and staging areas.

Planning and Building Department
6 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
h. Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes. i. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed. j. Reduce Traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less.
k. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust) exceed 25 miles per hour and during first and second stage smog alerts. l. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible emissions from construction. m. Use low emission mobile construction equipment (e.g., tractors, scrapers, dozers, etc.) where practicable.
n. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators rather than temporary power generators, where practicable. o. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned.
p. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable.

MM 5.2-4 Prior to issuance of each
grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan) Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all can be reused on the project site.

Planning and Building Department
7 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM 5.2-5 Prior to the issuance of
each building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary source. Copies of permits shall be given to the Planning and Building Department.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.2-6 Prior to the issuance of
each building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall implement, and demonstrate to the City, measures that are being taken to reduce operation-related air quality impacts. These measures may include, but are not limited to the following:
a. Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors. b. Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances. c. Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in building design, such as appropriate passive solar design. d. Use drought-resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy used in pumping and transporting water.
e. To the extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for employees or participate in a joint development daycare center
f. Install facilities for electric vehicle recharging, unless it is demonstrated that the technology for these facilities or availability of the equipment current at the time makes this installation infeasible.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.2-7 Prior to issuance of the
first building permit
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a human health risk assessment (HRA) for any proposed sensitive land uses (according to SCAQMD standards at that time) to be located within 500 feet of the near edge of the I-5 freeway unless it is demonstrated that the health risks have been determined to be acceptable according to the standards of the SCAQMD at the time of building permit application.

Planning and Building Department
8 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MM 5.3-1 Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a survey for active raptor nests shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist and submitted to the Planning and Building Department 30 days prior to commencement of any demolition or construction activities during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30) and within 500 feet of a fan palm, juniper, or canary island pine. Should an active nest be identified, restrictions defined by a qualified Biologist will be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active nest observed until the nest is no longer active, as determined by a qualified Biologist.

These restrictions may include a 300- to 500-foot buffer zone designated around a nest to allow construction to proceed while minimizing disturbance to the active nest. Once the nest is no longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer zone.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.3-2 Prior to the issuance of a
demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a letter detailing the proposed schedule for vegetation removal activities shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department, verifying that removal shall take place between August 1 and February 28 to avoid the bird nesting season. This would ensure that no active nests would be disturbed. If this is not feasible, then a qualified Biologist shall inspect any trees which would be impacted prior to demolition, grading or construction activities to ensure no nesting birds are present. If a nest is present, then appropriate minimization measures shall be developed by the Biologist.

Planning and Building Department
CULTURAL RESOURCES MM 5.4-1 Prior to issuance of each
grading permit
Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented:
a. The archaeologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts Planning and Building Department
9 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational or research institution. c. Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted.

MM 5.4-2 Prior to issuance of each
grading permit
Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented:
a. The paleontologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational or research institution. c. Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not Planning and Building Department
10 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area.

MM 5.4-3 Prior to approval of a final
site plan for properties that contain a structure over 45 years old Prior to approval of a final site plan for properties that contain a structure over 45 years old, property owners/developers shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division, documentation to verify the presence/absence of historic resources. On properties where resources are identified, such documentation shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist.

Planning and Building Department
GEOLOGY AND SOILS MM 5.5-1 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division for review and approval, detailed foundation design information for the subject building(s), prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations by a geotechnical engineer.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.5-2 Prior to issuance of each
foundation permit
Prior to issuance of each foundation permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division for review and approval, which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations to determine if soft layers are present immediately beneath the footing site and to ensure that compressibility does not underlie the footing.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.5-3 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Planning Department, Building Services Division for review and approval showing that the proposed structure has been analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the most recent seismic standards in the California Building Code adopted by the City of Anaheim.

Planning and Building Department
11 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM 5.5-4 Prior to the final building
and zoning inspection for a hotel/motel
Prior to the final building and zoning inspection for a hotel/motel, the property owner/developer shall submit an earthquake emergency response plan for review and approval by the Fire Department. The plan shall require posted notices in all hotel rooms on earthquake safety procedures and incorporate ongoing earthquake training for hotel staff to the satisfaction of the Fire Department.

Fire Department
MM 5.5-5 Ongoing during grading
activities
Ongoing during grading activities, the property owner/developer shall implement standard practices for all applicable codes and ordinances to prevent erosion to the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.5-6 Prior to issuance of
building or grading permits
Prior to issuance of building or grading permits, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division geologic and geotechnical investigations in areas of potential seismic or geologic hazards and provide a note on plans that all grading operations will be conducted in conformance with the recommendations contained in the applicable geotechnical investigation.

Planning and Building Department
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MM 5.7-1 Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first, in areas of former service stations, in areas known or thought to have been previously occupied by USTs, and in areas where tank removal has not been verified prior to excavation or grading the property owner/developer shall retain the services of a qualified environmental professional to conduct an investigation for known, or the presence of, cryptic tanks, using geophysical methods. Soil sampling or a soil organic vapor survey may be required if soil sampling results are not available, or indicate contamination is present above regulatory guidelines. If warranted, subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken in these areas, and appropriate remediation measures developed, if necessary, before demolition, excavation, or grading takes place in these areas.

Fire Department
12 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM 5.7-2 Prior to the removal of
USTs
Prior to the removal of USTs, the property owner/developer shall obtain a permit from the Environmental Protection Hazardous Materials Management Section of the Fire Department for the removal of such tanks. During the removal of USTs, a representative from the Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department shall be onsite to direct soil sampling.

Fire Department
MM 5.7-3 Ongoing during
remediation all remediation activities of surface or subsurface contamination not related to USTs Ongoing during remediation all remediation activities of surface or subsurface contamination not related to USTs, conducted on behalf of the property owner/developer, shall be overseen by the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). Information on subsurface contamination from USTs shall be provided to the Public Utilities Department, Environmental Services Division. Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB) with a copy to Planning & Building. Note: Per a memo dated October 22, 2014 from the Public Utilities Department, as of July 1, 2014, the Environmental Services Division of the Public Utilities Department is no longer responsible for overseeing the cleanup of new UST cases, and the responsibility has been delegated to the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB). However, the Anaheim Fire Department will still be responsible for overseeing the removal of USTs. (amended February 26, 2015).

Fire Department Public Utilities
Department Planning & Building
MM 5.7-4 Prior to issuance of the
first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall submit a plan for review and approval by the Fire Department which details procedures that will be taken if previously unknown USTs, or other unknown hazardous material or waste, is discovered onsite.

Fire Department
MM 5.7-5 Prior to issuance of the
first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first for future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area affecting any property on a published list of leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) that has not been officially closed or resolved, a qualified environmental professional, retained by the property owner/developer, shall attempt to contact the current and/or known former property/business owners Fire Department Public Utilities
Department Planning & Building
13 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
to obtain information regarding the status of USTs and/or tank closures at these sites. If warranted, subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken by a qualified environmental professional, and results of these analyses shall be submitted to the Fire Department and the Environmental Services Division of the Public Utilities Department Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB), for review and approval. Appropriate remediation measures will be developed, if necessary, before demolition, excavation, or grading takes place in these areas. A copy of the approval letter with any appropriate remediation measures shall be submitted to Planning & Building.

MM 5.7-6 Ongoing during project
demolition and construction
Ongoing during project demolition and construction, in the event that hazardous waste, including asbestos, is discovered during site preparation or construction, the property owner/developer shall ensure that the identified hazardous waste and/or hazardous material are handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5), and according to the requirements of the California Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22.

Fire Department
MM 5.7-7 Prior to issuance of any
discretionary permit for a current or former hazardous waste disposal site or solid waste disposal site Prior to issuance of any discretionary permit for a current or former hazardous waste disposal site or solid waste disposal site, the project property owner/developer shall submit a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment to the City. If possible hazardous materials are identified during the site assessments, the appropriate response/remedial measures will be implemented in accordance with the requirements of the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), as appropriate.

Fire Department
14 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY MM 5.8-1 Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff Management Plan (MDRMP) for review and approval by the Public Works Department, Development Services Division and Orange County (OC) Public Works/OC Engineering. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following items:
a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and including the 100-year storm; and, b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control of project-generated drainage and runoff.

Public Works Department
MM 5.8-2 Prior to issuance of a
grading permit for sites
that disturb more than one (1) acre of soil
Prior to issuance of a grading permit for sites that disturb more than one (1) acre of soil, the property owner/developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES Statewide Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence of attainment shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.8-3 Ongoing during project
operations
Ongoing during project operations, the property owner/developer shall provide for the following: cleaning of all paved areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim on a monthly basis, including, but not limited to, private streets and parking lots. The use of water to clean streets, paved areas, parking lots, and other areas and flushing the debris and sediment down the storm drains shall be prohibited.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.8-4 Prior to each final building
and zoning inspection
Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter from a licensed landscape architect to the City certifying that the landscape installation and irrigation systems have been installed as specified in the approved landscaping and irrigation plans.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.8-5 Prior to final building and
zoning inspection
Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall install piping on-site with project water mains so that reclaimed water may be used for landscape irrigation, if and when it becomes available.

Public Utilities Department
15 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM 5.8-6 Prior to issuance of
building permits
Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/developer shall provide written evidence that all storm drain, sewer, and street improvement plans shall be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Public Works Department
NOISE 5.10-1 Ongoing during
construction,
Ongoing during construction, the property owner/developer shall ensure that all internal combustion engines on construction equipment and trucks are fitted with properly maintained mufflers.

Planning and Building Department

5.10-2 Prior to approval of each
final site plan
Prior to approval of each final site plan, the property owner/developer shall submit a noise study prepared by a certified acoustical engineer to the satisfaction of the Building Division Manager identifying whether noise attenuation is required and defining the attenuation measures and specific performance requirements, if warranted, to comply with the Uniform Building Code and Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. Ultimate noise attenuation requirements, if any, shall depend on the final location of such buildings and noise-sensitive uses inside and surrounding the buildings. Attenuation measures shall be implemented by the property owner/developer prior to final building and zoning inspections.

Planning and Building Department

5.10-3 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, for structures that are adjacent to noise-sensitive areas such as residences, the property owner/developer shall ensure that all mechanical ventilation units are shown on plans and installed in compliance with Sound Pressure Level Ordinance.

Planning and Building Department

5.10-4 Prior to issuance of each
building permit for a parking structure
Prior to issuance of each building permit for a parking structure, the property owner/developer shall ensure that noise from parking structures adjacent to residential areas will be reduced by the provision of convenient access to parking facilities, sound attenuation devices (louvers and walls), the use of textured deck surfaces to reduce tire squalling, and tiering a parking facility to provide greater distance to the receptor.

Planning and Building Department

5.10-5 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, a note shall be provided on building plans indicating that during construction, the property owner/developer shall install and maintain specially designed construction barriers at the project Planning and Building Department
16 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
perimeter areas. The construction sound barriers shall be a minimum height of 8 feet with a minimum surface weight of 1.25 pounds per square foot or a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 25. The structure shall be a continuous barrier. Gates and other entry doors shall be constructed with suitable mullions, astragals, seals, or other design techniques to minimize sound leakage when in the closed position. Access doors should be self closing where feasible. Vision ports are permissible providing they are filled with an acceptable solid vision product.

5.10-6 Ongoing during
construction and project operation
Ongoing during construction and project operation, pressure washing operations for purposes of building repair and maintenance due to graffiti or other aesthetical considerations shall be limited to daytime hours of operation between 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM.

Planning and Building Department

5.10-7 Ongoing during
construction and project operation
Ongoing during construction and project operation, sweeping operations in the parking facilities and private on-site roadways shall be performed utilizing sweeping/scrubbing equipment which operate at a level measured not greater than 60 dBA at the nearest adjacent property line.

Planning and Building Department

5.10-8 Ongoing during
construction
Ongoing during construction, property owners/developers shall pay for all reasonable costs associated with noise monitoring which shall include monitoring conducted by a certified acoustical engineer under the direction of the Planning and Building Department four times a year on a random basis to ensure that outdoor construction-related sound levels at any point on the exterior project boundary property line do not exceed 60 dBA between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM of the following day where outside construction is occurring. If a complaint is received by the City, additional noise monitoring shall be conducted at the discretion of the City. If the monitoring finds that the 60 dBA threshold is being exceeded, construction activities will be modified immediately to bring the sound level below the 60 dBA requirement, with additional follow-up monitoring conducted to confirm compliance.

Planning and Building Department
17 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion

5.10-9 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall present plans and calculations to the Planning Department, Building Division to demonstrate that noise levels would be less than 65 dBA CNEL for outdoor use areas (including dining patios, pools, playgrounds, or outdoor gathering areas). This requirement can be accomplished through shielding areas behind buildings or the construction of a noise barrier.

Planning and Building Department

5.10-10 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall present plans and calculations to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division to demonstrate that noise levels from planned mechanical ventilation equipment, loading docks, trash compactors, and other proposed on-site noise sources are designed to meet the City’s 60 dBA Sound Pressure Levels standard at the property line, and not create a noise increase greater than 5 dBA over existing ambient noise at the nearest noise sensitive receptor, whichever is more restrictive.

Planning and Building Department

5.10-11 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, a note shall be provided on plans indicating that there shall be no operation of large bulldozers or vibratory rollers within 25 feet of any existing residence.

Planning and Building Department

5.10-12 Prior to issuance of each
building permit if pile driving and blasting is anticipated during construction Prior to issuance of each building permit if pile driving and blasting is anticipated during construction, a noise and vibration analysis must be prepared and submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division, to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities.

Planning and Building Department
PUBLIC SERVICES 5.12-1 Prior to the approval of
each Final Site Plan and issuance of each building permit Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review and approval for safety, accessibility, crime prevention, and security provisions during both the construction and operative phases for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the project design including the concept of crime prevention through environmental design (e.g., building design, circulation, site planning, and lighting of parking structures and parking areas).

Police Department
18 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion

5.12-2 Prior to the issuance of
each building permit for a parking structure
Prior to the issuance of each building permit for a parking structure, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review and approval indicating the provision of closed circuit television monitoring and recording or other substitute security measures as may be approved by the Police Department. Said measures shall be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections.

Police Department

5.12-3 Ongoing during project
operation
Ongoing during project operation, the property owner/developer shall provide private security on the premises to maintain adequate security for the entire project subject to review and approval of the Police Department. The use of security patrols and electronic security devices (i.e., video monitors) should be considered to reduce the potential for criminal activity in the area.

Police Department

5.12-4 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, the project design shall include parking lots and parking structures with controlled access points to limit ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Police Department, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Police Department.

Police Department

5.12-5 Prior to commencement of
structural framing on each parcel or lot
Prior to commencement of structural framing on each parcel or lot, onsite fire hydrants shall be installed and charged by the property owner/developer as required and approved by the Fire Department.

Fire Department

5.12-6 Prior to issuance of each
grading permit
Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit an emergency fire access plan to the Fire Department for review and approval to ensure that service to the site is in accordance with Fire Department service requirements.

Fire Department

5.12-7 Prior to issuance of each
building permit; to be implemented prior to the final building and zoning inspection Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to the final building and zoning inspection, plans shall indicate that all buildings, exclusive of parking structures, shall have sprinklers installed by the property owner/developer in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed prior to each final building and zoning inspection.

Fire Department

5.12-8 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, plans shall be submitted to ensure that development is in accordance with the City of Anaheim Fire Department Standards, including:
a. Overhead clearance shall not be less than 14 feet for the full width of Fire Department
19 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
access roads.
b. Bridges and underground structures to be used for Fire Department access shall be designed to support Fire Department vehicles weighing 75,000 pounds. c. All underground tunnels shall have sprinklers. Water supplies are required at all entrances. Standpipes shall also be provided when determined to be necessary by the Fire Department. d. Adequate off-site public fire hydrants contiguous to the Specific Plan area and onsite private fire hydrants shall be provided by the property owner/developer. The precise number, types, and locations of the hydrants shall be determined during building permit review. Hydrants are to be a maximum of 400 feet apart. e. A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall remain in the water system. Flow rates for public parking facilities shall be set at 1,000 to 1,500 gpm.

5.12-9 Prior to issuance of the
first building permit
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall enter into an agreement recorded against the property with the City of Anaheim to pay or cause to be paid their fair share of the funding to accommodate the following, which will serve the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area:
a. One additional fire truck company. b. One additional paramedic company. c. Modifications to existing fire stations to accommodate the additional fire units, additional manpower, equipment and facilities. d. A vehicle equipped with specialty tools and equipment to enable the Fire Department to provide heavy search and rescue response capability. e. A medical triage vehicle/trailer, equipped with sufficient trauma Fire Department
20 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
dressings, medical supplies, stretchers, etc., to handle 1,000 injured persons, and an appropriate storage facility.

The determination of the allocable share of costs attributable to the property owner/developer shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such equipment/facilities among property owners/developers in the Hotel Circle Specific Plan Area, the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area or the otherwise defined service area, as applicable, depending on the area served. Note: To implement this mitigation measure, the City has adopted the Fire Protection Facilities and Paramedic Services Impact Fee Program. Compliance with this Program by the property owner/developer (per Ordinance No. 5496 and Resolution No. 95R-73 dated May 16, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this Mitigation Measure, or the City may enter into alternative financing arrangements.

5.12-10 Prior to each final building
and zoning inspection
Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall place emergency telephone service numbers in prominent locations as approved by the Fire Department.

Fire Department

5.12-11 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a Construction Fire Protection Plan to the Fire Department for review and approval detailing accessibility of emergency fire equipment, fire hydrant location, and any other construction features required by the Fire Marshal. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for securing facilities acceptable to the Fire Department and hydrants shall be operational with required fire flow.

Fire Department

5.12-12 Prior to the approval of
each Final Site Plan and prior to the issuance of each building permit Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and prior to the issuance of each building permit, plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department as being in conformance with the Uniform Fire Code.

Fire Department

5.12-13 Prior to the placement of
building materials on a
Prior to the placement of building materials on a building site, an all-weather road shall be provided from the roadway system to and on the construction Fire Department
21 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
building site site and for fire hydrants at all times, as required by the Fire Department.

Such routes shall be paved or, subject to the approval of the Fire Department, shall otherwise provide adequate emergency access. Every building constructed must be accessible to Fire Department apparatus. The width and radius of the driving surface must meet the requirements of Section 10.204 of the Uniform Fire Code, as adopted by the City of Anaheim.

5.12-14 Prior to approval of
building plans
Prior to approval of building plans, the property owner/developer shall provide written evidence to the satisfaction of the Fire Department that all lockable pedestrian and/or vehicular access gates shall be equipped with “knox box” devices as required and approved by the Fire Department.

Fire Department

5.12-15 Prior to approval of on-site
water plans
Prior to approval of on-site water plans, unless each commercial building is initially connected to separate fire services, an unsubordinated covenant satisfactory to the City Attorney’s Office shall be recorded prohibiting any individual sale of buildings until separate fire services are installed in the building(s) subject to the sale.

Fire Department

5.12-16 Prior to approval of water
improvement plans
Prior to approval of water improvement plans, the water supply system shall be designed by the property owner/developer to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage for the proposed land use and fire protection services in accordance with Fire Department requirements.

Fire Department

5.12-17 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall provide proof of compliance with Government Code Section 53080 (Schools).

Planning and Building Department

5.12-18 Ongoing Ongoing, the City will work cooperatively with school districts to identify opportunities for new schools and school expansion.

Planning and Building Department

5.12-19 Prior to the issuance of a
building permit
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 17.08.385, Public Library Facilities Services Areas – Payment of Fees Required.

Planning and Building Department
TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 5.14-1 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or
Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, Public Works Department
22 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
more peak hour trips the property owner/developer shall prepare traffic improvement phasing analyses to identify when the improvements identified in this traffic analysis shall be designed and constructed.

5.14-2 Prior to issuance of the
first building permit for each building
Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each building, the property owner/developer shall pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees and Transportation Impact and Improvement Fees to the City of Anaheim in amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit with credit given for City-authorized improvements provided by the property owner/developer. The property owner shall also participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts, which have been established.

Public Works Department

5.14-3 Prior to approval of the
first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-ofway adjacent to their property as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan.

Public Works Department

5.14-4 Prior to the final building
and zoning inspection Prior to issuance of the first building permit Prior to the final building and zoning inspection Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner shall join and financially participate in a clean fuel shuttle program such as the Anaheim Resort Transit Transportation (ART) system, and shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) in conjunction with the on-going operation of the project. Proof of compliance with this requirement shall be submitted by the Anaheim Transportation Network to the City Traffic Engineer. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property that requires participation in these programs ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. Proof of compliance with this requirement shall be the submittal of a copy of the recorded covenant to the City Traffic Engineer.

Public Works Department

5.14-5 Prior to the issuance of
grading permits
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department a plan to Public Works Department
23 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
coordinate rideshare services for construction employees with the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) for review and a approval and shall implement ATN recommendations to the extent feasible.

5.14-6 Prior to the issuance of
each building permit for a hotel development that exceeds 100 rooms per gross acre within the Commercial Recreation District within the Convention Center Medium density category Prior to the issuance of each building permit for a hotel development that exceeds 100 rooms per gross acre within the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) within the Convention Center (CC) Medium density category, the property owner shall record a covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during project implementation, the property owner/developer shall implement TDM measures sufficient to reduce the actual trip generation from the development to no more than the trips assumed by the City’s traffic model. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office.

Public Works Department

5.14-7 Ongoing during
construction
Ongoing during construction, if the Anaheim Police Department or the Anaheim Traffic Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fair-share basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services.

Police Department Public Works Department

5.14-8 Prior to the final building
and zoning inspection Prior to issuance of the first building permit Measure 5.14-8: Prior to the final building and zoning inspection Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner shall record a covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during project implementation, the property owner/developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office and proof of compliance with this requirement shall be the submittal of a copy of the recorded covenant to the City Traffic Engineer. Objectives of the TDM program shall be:
a. Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests.
b. Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce project-generated trips.
c. Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip Public Works Department
24 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership.

5.14-9 Prior to the final building
and zoning inspection Prior to issuance of the first building permit Prior to the final building and zoning inspection Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department, City Traffic Engineer, for review and approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future employees’ commute options, and incentives for hotel patrons’ transportation options. These options may include, but are not limited to, the list below. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property requiring that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation and proof of compliance with this requirement shall be the submittal of a copy of the recorded covenant to the City Traffic Engineer. a. On-site services. Provide, as feasible and permitted, on-site services such as the food, retail, and other services.
b. Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the purpose of providing a “matching” of employees with other employees who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare. c. Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing vanpool programs. d. Transit Pass. Promote Orange County Transportation Authority (including commuter rail) passes through financial assistance and onsite sales to encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from throughout the region. e. Shuttle Service. Generate a commuter listing of all employees living in proximity to the project, and offer a local shuttle program to encourage employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. When Public Works Department
25 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
appropriate, event shuttle service shall also be made available for guests. f. Bicycling. Develop a Bicycling Program to offer a bicycling alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers should be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area should be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options. g. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Develop a program to provide employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift. h. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. Promote an incentive program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips. i. Work Shifts. Stagger work shifts. j. Compressed Work Week. Develop a “compressed work week” program, which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for employees. k. Telecommuting. Explore the possibility of a “telecommuting” program that would link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with modem). l. Parking Management. Develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than single-occupant auto to travel to work. m. Access. Provide preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and shuttles.
n. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Offer employees financial incentives for ridesharing or using public transportation. Currently, federal law provides tax-free status for up to 26 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
$65 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools. o. Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Offer employees financial incentives for bicycling to work.
p. Special “Premium” for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction. Offer ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. to employees who recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction programs. q. Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs for carpooling and other alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction of longest commute trips.

5.14-10 Prior to approval of each
tentative tract or parcel map
Prior to approval of each tentative tract or parcel map, the following Street Design Elements shall be shown on each tentative tract or parcel map:
a. Street cross-sections, including dimensions, labels, circulation designation (i.e., Resort Secondary) and whether public or private. b. Street grades and vertical alignment. c. Horizontal alignment, including radii, and cul-de-sac radii.

Public Works Department

5.14-11 Prior to the recordation of
a subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, in the event that a parcel is subdivided and there is a need for common on-site circulation and/or parking, prior to recordation of a subdivision map, an unsubordinated covenant providing for reciprocal access and/or parking, as appropriate, approved by the Planning Director or Planning Services Manager, shall be recorded with the Office of the Orange County Recorder. A copy of the recorded covenant shall then be submitted to the Planning Division of the Planning and Department. If the reciprocal access is across parcel lines or if public rights of way are required for reciprocal access; Public Works approval shall be required.

Planning and Building Department

5.14-12 Prior to the issuance of the Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the location of any proposed Public Works 27 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
first building permit gates across a driveway shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Gates shall not be installed across any driveway or private street in a manner which may adversely affect vehicular traffic on the adjacent public streets. Installation of any gates shall conform to the current version of Engineering Standard Detail No. 475.

Department

5.14-13 Prior to the issuance of
building permits
Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans shall show that all driveways shall be constructed with a minimum fifteen (15) foot radius curb returns as required by the City Engineer, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

Public Works Department

5.14-14 Prior to the issuance of
building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first Prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first, security in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, completion guarantee, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, water facilities, street grading and pavement, sewer and drainage facilities and other appurtenant work, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with the specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, as may be modified by the City Engineer. Installation of said improvements shall occur prior to final building and zoning inspections.

Public Works Department

5.14-15 Based upon the
improvement phasing analysis in the project traffic study Based upon the improvement phasing analysis in the project traffic study, the property owner/developer shall implement traffic improvements as identified in the project traffic study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as defined by the City’s General Plan, based on thresholds of significance, performance standards, and methodologies established by the Orange County Congestion Management Program and the City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. The improvement phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction, and fair-share responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. The property owner/developer shall construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary circulation system improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Public Works Department
28 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
Manager, unless alternative funding sources have been identified.

5.14-16 Prior to approval of a Final
Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, in conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in MM 5.14-1, property owners/developers will determine when the intersection improvements shall be constructed, subject to the conditions identified in MM 5.14-1.

Public Works Department

5.14-17 Prior to approval of a Final
Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, in conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in MM 5.14-1, the following actions shall be taken in cooperation with the City of Orange:
a. The traffic improvement phasing analysis shall identify any impacts created by the project on facilities within the City of Orange. The fairshare percentage responsibility for mitigating these impacts shall be calculated in this analysis. b. The City of Anaheim shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share responsibility in cooperation with the City of Orange.
c. The property owner/developer shall pay the City of Anaheim the fairshare cost prior to issuance of a building permit. The City of Anaheim shall hold the amount received in trust, and then, once a mutually agreed upon joint program is executed by both cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate the fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow at the impacted locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to both cities.

Public Works Department

5.14-18 Prior to approval of a Final
Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, in conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses Public Works Department
29 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
as required in MM 5.14-1, and assuming that a regional transportation agency has not already programmed and funded the warranted improvements to the impacted freeway mainline or freeway ramp locations, property owners/developers and the City will take the following actions in cooperation with Caltrans:
a. The traffic study will identify the project’s proportionate impact on the specific freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp locations and its fairshare percentage responsibility for mitigating these impacts based on thresholds of significance, performance standards, and methodologies established in the Orange County Congestion Management Program and the City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. b. The City shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share responsibility in cooperation with Caltrans.

5.14-19 Prior to the approval of the
final subdivision map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall pay the identified fair-share responsibility as determined by the City as set forth in MM 5.14-15. The City shall allocate the property owner/developer’s fairshare contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow on the impacted mainline and ramp locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the City.

Public Works Department

5.14-20 Prior to the approval of a
Final Site Plan
Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall meet with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA).

Public Works Department

5.14-21 Prior to the first final
building and zoning Inspection
Prior to the first final building and zoning Inspection every property owner and/or lessee shall designate an on-site contact that will be responsible for coordinating with the ATN and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on-site coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the Public Works Department
30 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
project with the ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement with all of the project participants.

5.14-22 Subsequent to the
certification of Final EIR No. 340, and prior to the approval of the first Final Site Plan Subsequent to the certification of Final EIR No. 340, and prior to the approval of the first Final Site Plan, if the costs of the identified improvements in the Traffic Study Report for Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan cannot be covered by the total funding allocation under the existing City fee programs and funding sources, an update of the existing City traffic fee program or other fee programs shall be developed by the City of Anaheim to ensure completion of the recommended improvements.

Public Works Department
WATER SUPPLY AND INFRASTRUCTURE 5.15-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit (to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections, and continuing on an on-going basis during project operation) Prior to issuance of each building permit (to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections, and continuing on an on-going basis during project operation), the property owner/ developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Planning and Building Department plans for review and approval which shall ensure that water conservation measures are incorporated. The water conservation measures to be shown on the plans and implemented by the property owner/developer, to the extent applicable include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation systems. b. Use of waterway recirculation systems. c. Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and urinals.
d. Use of self-closing valves on drinking valves. e. Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors.
f. Use of low-flow shower heads in hotels.
g. Water efficient ice-machines, dishwashers, clothes washers and other water-using appliances.

Public Utilities
Department Planning and Building Department
31 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
h. Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates are lowest.
i. Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation.
j. Use of water conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible.

5.15-2 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, all water supply planning for the project will be closely coordinated with, and be subject to the review and final approval of, the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division and Fire Department.

Public Utilities Department Fire Department

5.15-3 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, water pressure greater than 80 pounds per square inch (psi) shall be reduced to 80 psi or less by means of pressure reducing valves installed at the property owner/developer’s service.

Planning and Building Department

5.15-4 Prior to the issuance of
each building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan which shall be prepared and certified by a licensed landscape architect. The irrigation plan shall specify methods for monitoring the irrigation system. The system shall ensure that irrigation rates do not exceed the infiltration of local soils, that the application of fertilizers and pesticides do not exceed appropriate levels of frequencies, and that surface runoff and overwatering is minimized. The landscaping and irrigation plans shall include water-conserving features such as low flow irrigation heads, automatic irrigation scheduling equipment, flow sensing controls, rain sensors, soil moisture sensors, and other water-conserving equipment. The landscaping and irrigation plans shall indicate that separate irrigation lines for recycled water shall be constructed and recycled water will be used when it becomes available. All irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with recycled water.

Planning and Building Department

5.15-5 Prior to approval of the
Final Site Plan and building permits
Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan and building permits, plans shall specifically show that the water meter and backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment will be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, aboveground and behind the building setback line in a manner fully screened from all public streets Public Utilities Department
32 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
and alleys and in accordance with Ordinance No. 4156. Prior to the final building and zoning inspections, the water meter and backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, in accordance with the Final Site Plan and the building permit plans.

5.15-6 Prior to issuance of each
building permit, unless records indicate previous payment Prior to issuance of each building permit, unless records indicate previous payment, the appropriate fees for Primary Mains, Secondary Mains and Fire Protection Service shall be paid to the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division in accordance with Rule 15A, and Rule 20 of the Public Utilities Department Water Rates, Rules and Regulations.

Public Utilities Department

5.15-7 Prior to final building and
zoning inspections
Prior to final building and zoning inspections, a separate water meter shall be installed for landscape water on all projects where the landscape area exceeds 2,500 square feet in accordance with Ordinance No. 6160.

Planning and Building Department

5.15-8 Prior to the issuance of the
first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall comply with Rule 15E of the Public Utilities Department Water Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Rule 15E shall be amended to include:
a. Construction of a new well with a minimum 1,500 GPM capacity to serve The Anaheim Resort Area (tentative location near Ponderosa Park and Orangewood Avenue); and b. Construction of a new 16-inch water main along Harbor Boulevard from Orangewood to Chapman Avenue.

Public Utilities Department

5.15-9 Ongoing Ongoing, the City shall continue to collaborate with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), its member agencies, and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to ensure that available water supplies meet anticipated demand. If it is forecasted that water demand exceeds available supplies, staff shall recommend to City Council to trigger application of the Water Conservation Ordinance (Anaheim Municipal Code, §10.18), as prescribed, to require mandatory conservation measures as authorized by Sections 10.18.070 through 10.18.090, as appropriate.

Public Utilities Department
33 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
SEWER 5.16-1 Prior to approval of a final
subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall participate in the City’s Master Plan of Sewers and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in mitigating existing and future sanitary sewer system deficiencies as follows: The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval of the City Engineer to assist in determining the following:
a. If the development/redevelopment (1) does not discharge into a sewer system that is currently deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge and/or (2) does not increase flows or change points of discharge, then the property owner’s/developer’s responsibility shall be limited to participation in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program. b. If the development/redevelopment (1) discharges into a sewer system that is currently deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge and/or (2) increases flows or changes points of discharge, then the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney of the impact prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements identified in the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as recommended by the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study, prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final building and zoning inspections for the building/structure, whichever comes first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, as determined by the City Engineer, which may include fees, credits, reimbursements, or a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts Public Works Department
34 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
for the sanitary sewer system, the property owner/developer shall submit a sanitary sewer system improvement phasing plan for the project to the City Engineer for review and approval which shall contain, at a minimum, (1) a layout of the complete system, (2) all facility sizes, including support calculations, (3) construction phasing, and (4) construction estimates.

The study shall determine the impact of the project sewer flows for total build out of the project and identify local deficiencies for each project component (i.e., each hotel).

ELECTRICITY 5.17-1 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/develop shall consult with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department, Business and Community Programs Division, in order to review energy efficient measures to incorporate into the project design. Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner developer shall implement these energy efficient measures which may include the following:
a. High-efficiency air-conditioning systems with EMS (computer) control b. Variable air volume (VAV) distribution c. Outside air (100%) economizer cycle d. Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads
e. Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas f. Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor motors, air-handling units, and fan-coil units)
g. Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces h. Use of compact fluorescent lamps i. Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps Public Utilities Department
35 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
j. Use of light emitting diode (LED) or equivalent energy-efficient lighting for outdoor lighting
k. Use of Energy Star® exit lighting or exit signage. l. Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard fluorescent fixtures are identified
m. Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high-pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and parking lots n. Consideration of thermal energy storage air-conditioning for spaces or facilities that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak periods. o. For swimming pools and spas, incorporate solar heating, automatic covers, and efficient pumps and motors, as feasible.
p. Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as: a. New construction design review, in which the City cost-shares engineering for up to $10,000 for design of energy efficient buildings and systems b. New Construction – cash incentives ($300 to $400 per kW reduction in load) for efficiency that exceeds Title 24 requirements c. Green Building Program – offers accelerated plan approval, financial incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance.

5.17-2 Prior to final building and
zoning inspection
Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall install an underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underground Systems. Electrical Service Fees and other Public Utilities Department
36 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underground Systems.

5.17-3 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans and calculations to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Building Division, to demonstrate that the energy efficiency of each building will exceed the Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings current at the time of application by at least 10 percent.

Planning and Building Department

5.17-4 Prior to approval of a Final
Site Plan
Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with the Public Utilities Department to incorporate feasible renewable energy generation measures into the project. These measures may include but not be limited to use of solar and small wind turbine sources on new and existing facilities and the use of solar powered lighting in parking areas.

Public Utilities Department
STORM WATER 5.18-1 Prior to approval of a final
subdivision map, or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first Prior to approval of a final subdivision map, or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall participate in the City’s Master Plan of Storm Drains and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in mitigating existing and future storm drainage system deficiencies as follows: The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval by the City Engineer to assist with determining the following:
a. If the specific development/redevelopment does not increase or redirect current or historic storm water quantities/flows, then the property owner/developer’s responsibility shall be limited to participation in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to provide storm drainage facilities in 10- and 25-year storm frequencies and to protect properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency. b. If the specific development/redevelopment increases or redirects the current or historic storm water quantity/flow, then the property Public Works Department
37 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s office of the impact prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements identified in the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the storm drainage facilities as recommended by the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area to provide storm drainage facilities for 10- and 25-year storm frequencies and to protect properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final building and zoning inspection for the building/structure, whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program as determined by the City Engineer which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, or a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts on the storm drainage system, a storm drainage system improvement phasing plan for the project shall be submitted by the property owner/developer to the City Engineer for review and approval and shall contain, at a minimum, (1) a layout of the complete system; (2) all facility sizes, including support calculations; (3) construction phasing; and, (4) construction estimates.

5.18-2 Ongoing Ongoing, the City shall work with the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) to ensure that flood control facilities are well maintained and capable of accommodating, at a minimum, future 25-year storm flows for City-owned and maintained facilities, and 100-year storm flows for County facilities. Where improvements to local drainage facilities have the potential to increase discharges to County facilities, the City shall analyze potential impacts to County facilities in consultation with the Manager, County of Orange Flood Control Division. Encroachment Permits shall be obtained from the County’s Public Property Permits Section for any activity performed within OCFCD’s right of way.

Public Works Department
38 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion

5.18-3 Prior to the issuance of
building permits
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City shall require that building plans indicate that new developments will minimize stormwater and urban runoff into drainage facilities by incorporating design features such as detention basins, on-site water features, and other strategies.

Planning and Building Department

OTHER PUBLIC UTILITIES
39 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion

5.19-1 Prior to issuance of each
building permit; to be implemented prior to final building and zoning Inspection Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to final building and zoning Inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, as administered by the City of Anaheim and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans. Prior to final building and zoning inspection, implementation of said plan shall commence and shall remain in full effect. Waste management mitigation measures that shall be taken to reduce solid waste generation include, but are not limited to:
a. Detailing the location and design of on-site recycling facilities. b. Providing on-site recycling receptacles to encourage recycling. c. Complying with all Federal, State and City regulation for hazardous material disposal.
d. Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City.

In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989 (AB 939), the property owner/developer shall implement numerous solid waste reduction programs, as required by the Public Works Department, including, but not limited to:
a. Facilitating recycling by providing chutes or convenient locations for sorting and recycling bins.
b. Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and storing. c. Facilitating glass recycling (especially from restaurants) by providing adequate space for sorting and storing.
d. Providing trash compactors for non-recyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and the number of trips required for collection. e. Prohibiting curbside pick-up.

Public Works Department
40 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion

5.19-2 Ongoing during project
operation
Ongoing during project operation, the following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the property owner/developer:
a. Usage of recycled paper products for stationary, letterhead, and packaging.
b. Recovery of materials such as aluminum and cardboard. c. Collection of office paper for recycling. d. Collection of polystyrene (foam) cups for recycling. e. Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery.

Public Works Department

5.19-3 Prior to issuance of
building permits
Prior to issuance of building permits, plans shall show that trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the City of Anaheim Department of Public Works, Operations Division. On an ongoing basis, trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department.

Public Works Department

5.19-4 Prior to issuance of each
building permit,
Prior to issuance of each building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall demonstrate that the plans include provisions for the installation of trash and recycle receptacles near all benches and near high traffic areas such as plazas, transit stops and retail and dining establishments.

Public Works Department

5.19-5 Prior to issuance of each
grading and building permit
Prior to issuance of each grading and building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall submit to the Planning Director or Planning Services Manager for approval a Construction Waste Management Plan that, at a minimum, specifies that at least 75 percent of non-hazardous construction and demolition debris shall be recycled or salvaged and identifies the materials to be diverted from disposal and whether the materials will be sorted on site or co-mingled.

Planning and Building Department
Appendix C
Consistency of the Project with the
General Plan Circulation Element

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE

GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis
Goal 1.1 Provide a comprehensive
multimodal transportation
system that facilitates current
and long-term circulation of
people and goods in and
through the City.

Consistent. As part of The Disneyland Resort Project and the ARSP Project, the circulation system around The Anaheim Resort was improved to facilitate movement of vehicles and pedestrians around The Anaheim Resort. The Project supports alternative transportation modes by providing through provision of bicycle parking, pedestrian infrastructure, transit support, and TDM measures. Bicycle parking is provided for cast members at key locations throughout The Disneyland Resort and would continue to be installed as required by the City. The Project proposes installation of at least one and up to three pedestrian overpasses over Harbor Boulevard in conjunction with construction of a parking structure and potential relocation of the East Esplanade transportation center and provides a network of pedestrian paths and sidewalks throughout The Anaheim Resort. Development along the major transportation corridors would include a variety of visitor-serving uses with generous sidewalks, landscaping, and street furniture to accommodate pedestrians within The Anaheim Resort. The Project’s system of sidewalks provides easy access to a variety of land uses within and adjacent to the Resort area. In addition to the enhanced pedestrian areas, The Anaheim Resort is also served by the ART system, which provides access to a variety of ARSP uses and the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink Station.

Additionally, Disney would continue to implement and administer a TDM program for all cast members. The Project would continue to implement a variety of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future cast member commute options, including, but not limited to, ridesharing, vanpooling, transit passes, commuter busses, and shuttle services.

Disney would install a Class IV bikeway with a single two-way, off-street, shared-use pathway for pedestrians and bicycles on the east side of Walnut Street from Ball Road to Katella Avenue. It would also install a Class I bike lane on the north side of Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard and Clementine Street and a single two-way, off-street, shared-use pathway for pedestrians and bicycles on the west side of Clementine Street to Alro Way. It would install a bike parking facility in the East Parking Area and/or the Parking Overlay just north of the East Parking Area.

The Project would also implement physical improvements or pay fair shares of improvement costs at key intersections to be identified in consultation with City staff. These improvements were identified at locations where the Project would result in some degradation to operating conditions (level of service or queue lengths) and where the City’s ultimate ROW (individually or in conjunction with additional ROW to be dedicated by Disney at certain locations adjacent to Disney-owned properties) allows for improvements. The timing of implementation of improvements or payment of associated costs was determined in consultation with City staff. These improvements are summarized in Table C-1.

Construction Traffic Management and Trip Reduction Plans would be developed prior to approval of any grading or demolition plans for the Project.

Policy 3 Require that major new
development proposals
include traffic impact
analyses that identify
measures and financing to
mitigate traffic impacts.

Policy 6 Ensure the provision of
needed transportation
improvements through the
site plan and environmental
review process.

Policy 9 Consider aesthetics,
including the provision of
appropriate landscaping, in
the development of arterial
Consistent. Development along roadways (corridors) would be subject to the Design Plans of the DRSP and ARSP, which promote visual continuity throughout the Project Site through the use of architectural treatments, landscaping, street furniture, signage, lighting, color, and

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE

GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis
highways. other visual elements.

Goal 2.1 Maintain efficient traffic
operations on City streets and
maintain a peak hour level of
service not worse than D at
street intersections.

Consistent. In accordance with the City of Anaheim Criteria for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, the Project was evaluated for any effects on the existing and future circulation system. Where intersection deficiencies were identified, the Project is responsible for either implementing or contributing its fair share to feasible improvements.

These improvements are summarized in Table C-1. Policy 1 Make improvements to streets and intersections
experiencing conditions
worse than the applicable
Level of Service standard by
providing appropriate
improvements, including, but
not limited to:
 Landscaped median
islands to restrict left
turns, with median
opening spacing
occurring a minimum of
400 feet apart, and
preferably limited to
signalized locations.
 Adequate driveway
spacing of 125 feet (at 30
mph) to 230 feet (at 45
mph) between driveways
on arterial highways.

Policy 3 Install new warranted signals
as funding permits, with
minimum preferred spacing of
1,000 feet apart.

Consistent. Based on review of forecasted traffic conditions and in an effort to improve traffic capacity and smooth traffic flow, the Project proposes to install traffic signal control at the existing driveway to the Southeast District on Haster Street south of Katella Avenue, subject to a technical study proving the signal would meet warrants. It also proposes to install traffic signal control at the intersection of Manchester Avenue / Clementine Street & Alro Way.

Goal 2.2 Provide a safe circulation
system.

Consistent. The Project would not involve the construction of any new roadways, nor would the Project involve any new geometric design features that would have the potential to substantially increase hazards.

Also, the Project does not propose any new uses that would be incompatible with the existing transportation system or with other nearby land uses as the Project merely proposes to redistribute existing entitled uses throughout The Disneyland Resort and at the Disney ARSP Properties.

The Project directly supports a safe circulation system through the provision of the East Esplanade transportation center west of Harbor Boulevard to locate bus and shuttle loading off-street. The Project may relocate the transportation center to the East Parking Area or adjacent Parking Overlay in accordance with PDF 3.3-5 in the DR EIR, at which time it would construct at least one and up to three grade-separated pedestrian overpasses north of Disney Way and south of Manchester Avenue to connect the east side of Harbor Boulevard with the Theme Park District and to separate pedestrians from vehicle traffic.

Disney would install a Class I Bike Path with a single two-way, off-street, shared-use pathway for pedestrians and bicycles on the east side of Policy 1 Promote the principle that
streets have multiple uses
and users, and protect the
safety of all users.

Policy 2 Discourage high speed,
through traffic on local streets
with appropriate traffic
calming measures (e.g.,
traffic enforcement, bulbouts, lane striping, chokers, etc.).

Policy 3 Design access onto major
arterial streets in an orderly
and controlled manner.

Policy 5 Minimize disruptions to traffic
and pedestrian/bicycle flow.

Policy 6 Implement street design

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE

GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis
features such as the use of
medians, bus turnouts,
consolidated driveways and
on street parking prohibitions
to minimize mid-block traffic
congestion.

Walnut Street from Ball Road to Katella Avenue. It would also install a Class I bike lane on the north side of Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard and Clementine Street and a single two-way, off-street, shared-use pathway for pedestrians and bicycles on the west side of Clementine Street from Disney Way to Alro Way. It would install a bike parking facility in the East Parking Area and/or the Parking Overlay just north of the East Parking Area.

All Project access points would be designed to City standards and would be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works for safe design and operation.

As stated previously, development along the major transportation corridors would include a variety of visitor-serving uses with generous sidewalks, landscaping, and street furniture to accommodate pedestrians within The Anaheim Resort. The Project’s system of sidewalks provides easy access to a variety of land uses within and adjacent to The Anaheim Resort. In addition to the enhanced pedestrian areas, The Anaheim Resort is also served by the ART system, which provides access to a variety of uses and the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink Station.

Policy 7 Implement street design
features that discourage
through traffic intrusion on
residential streets.

Policy 10 Provide adequate sight
distances for safe vehicular
movement on roadways, at
intersections and at
driveways.

Goal 5.1 Promote bus service and
paratransit improvements.

Consistent. As stated previously, development along the major transportation corridors would include a variety of visitor-serving uses with generous sidewalks, landscaping, and street furniture to accommodate pedestrians within The Anaheim Resort. The Project’s system of sidewalks provides easy access to a variety of land uses within and adjacent to The Anaheim Resort. In addition to the enhanced pedestrian areas, The Anaheim Resort is also served by the ART system, which provides access to a variety of uses and the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink Station.

The Disneyland Resort is served by multiple bus lines and Disney provides bus and shuttle stops at the East Esplanade transportation center west of Harbor Boulevard. The transportation center may be relocated to the East Parking Area or adjacent Parking Overlay in accordance with PDF 3.3-5 in the DR EIR but would continue to provide similar services. Also, The Disneyland Resort is designed to accommodate people with all levels of mobility, providing accessibility for wheelchair users and people pushing strollers.

Policy 3 Support transit supportive
land uses in new
development.

Policy 5 Intensify land uses in close
proximity to future BRT
stop(s) where appropriate.

Policy 6 Improve pedestrian access to
transit facilities.

Goal 7.1 Protect and encourage
bicycle travel.

Consistent. The Project would not impact any existing bicycle lanes.

The Construction Management Plan that would be prepared prior to approval of any demolition or grading for the Project would include details on the maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian facilities during construction and connectivity through the Project Site, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Disney would install a Class I Bike Path with a single two-way, off-street, shared-use pathway for pedestrians and bicycles on the east side of Walnut Street between Ball Road and Katella Avenue. It would also install a Class I Bike Path on the north side of Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard and Clementine Street and a single two-way, offstreet, shared-use pathway for pedestrians and bicycles on the west side of Clementine Street from Disney Way to Alro Way. It would install a bike parking facility in the East Parking Area and/or the Parking Overlay just north of the East Parking Area. Bicycle parking is provided for cast members at key locations throughout The Disneyland Resort and would continue to be installed as required by the City and Disney’s Policy 2 Incorporate bicycle planning
into the traditional
transportation planning
process.

Policy 3 Support and implement
bicycle routes that minimize
cyclist/motorist conflicts.

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE

GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis
TDM program.

There are two other future bicycle facilities proposed in the General Plan Circulation Element adjacent to portions of the Project Site. The Project does not affect the ability for the City to install Class II Bike Lanes on Ball Road between Walnut Street and Flore Street / West Street (the eastern portion of which is adjacent to the Theme Park District). The Project also does not affect the ability for the City to install Class II Bike Lanes on Haster Street south of Katella Avenue, as the driveway to the Southeast District would be designed to accommodate this facility. The Project would pay in-lieu contributions to the City and dedicate right-ofway adjacent to the Project Site on Ball Road and Haster Street for each of these facilities.

Goal 8.1 Protect and encourage
pedestrian travel.

Consistent. All future development within the Project Site would be subject to development guidelines as set forth in the Design Plans for the DRSP and the ARSP, as applicable. Consistent with development within The Disneyland Resort and the ARSP area to date, future development would continue to focus on centralized parking facilities that connect to an integrated system of pedestrian-oriented pathways and walkways connecting to hotels, retail and dining, and theme parks.

As detailed in the Design Plans, landscaping, lighting, and complementary features such as pedestrian-friendly furnishings would be located along the walkways to provide an enhanced experience.

From the parking facilities and within the Project Site, pedestrian circulation would be directed to protected routes, or those that are physically separated from roadways and avoid street crossings. The Project would include at least one and up to three grade-separated pedestrian overpasses south of Manchester Avenue and north of Disney Way to provide connection between the East Parking Area parking structure and the Theme Park District without impeding traffic flow. In addition to the enhanced pedestrian areas, the parking facilities would also be served by the Disney-operated tram system, providing direct access to retail and dining areas and theme parks.

An existing pedestrian route running east-west between Harbor Boulevard and Disneyland Drive currently serves as the main connection to the entrances of Disneyland and Disney California Adventure, including ticket booths and entry gates. To the west of the theme park entrances, this walkway becomes the retail, dining and entertainment district known as Downtown Disney, continuing westward on a grade-separated pedestrian overpass constructed over the lowered Disneyland Drive, and currently ending near The Disneyland Resort hotels west of Disneyland Drive. Pedestrian-friendly furnishings, retail and dining uses, and landscaping exist all along this pedestrian route, which while generally open to the public is on private property and subject to Disney restrictions. Project implementation may include reconfiguration and/or replacement of the existing east-west pedestrian route, including the space currently devoted to central theme park ticketing and gate functions. With any such shifts, a non-ticketed pedestrian route for east-west circulation shall continue to be provided through the Theme Park District connecting major destinations (theme parks, Downtown Disney, hotels, and parking facilities) to Harbor Boulevard and Walnut Street and would meet public safety size requirements.

With the removal of the planned extensions of Clementine Street and Gene Autry Way, future sidewalks along those streets would also be eliminated from the General Plan. Despite the closure of Magic Way, Policy 1 Encourage and improve
pedestrian facilities that link
development to the
circulation network and that
serve as a transition between
other modes of travel.

Policy 2 Improve pedestrian and
bicycle connections from
residential neighborhoods to
retail activity centers,
employment centers,
schools, parks, open space
areas and community
centers.

Policy 5 Add raised, landscaped
medians, and bulbouts,
where appropriate, to reduce
exposure to cross traffic at
street crossings.

Policy 6 When appropriate, walkways
should include pedestrian
amenities such as shade
trees and/or plantings, trash
bins, benches, shelters, and
directional kiosks.

Policy 7 Ensure that streets and
intersections are designed to
provide visibility and safety
for pedestrians.

Policy 10 Require commercial
developments to provide
specific pedestrian access
points independent from auto
entrances.

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE

GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis
pedestrian connectivity would be maintained between the Theme Park District and Walnut Street.

Future development within the Project Site would be subject to specific development standards intended to enhance the pedestrian experience with a focus on accessibility and safe passage.

Goal 9.1 Provide carpooling and
vanpooling opportunities for
commuters.

Consistent. Disney would continue to implement and administer a TDM program for all cast members. The Project would continue to implement a variety of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future cast member commute options, including, but not limited to, ridesharing, vanpooling, transit passes, commuter busses, and shuttle services. The Project’s TDM program also includes carpool/vanpool matching services for Disney cast members and provides financial support and incentives for participation.

Policy 2 Continue to encourage
vanpooling for City residents
and workers.

Policy 4 Cooperate with public or
private providers of vanpool
services and publicize
vanpool options to residents.

Goal 10.1 Facilitate safe surface truck
movement while minimizing
the impact of truck traffic on
residential streets.

Consistent. PDF 3.8-3 in the DR EIR requires preparation of a Truck Route Plan identifying haul truck routes on arterials, avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. This condition would similarly apply to the Disney ARSP Properties. Additionally, the Project provides for on-site loading for all Project Site uses. Policy 2 Reexamine truck routes as needed to ensure the safety
of residents, neighborhoods,
pedestrians, cyclists, and
other motorists.

Policy 3 Require sufficient on-site
loading to minimize
interference with traffic
circulation.

Policy 4 Restrict heavy vehicles from
entering the immediate
vicinity of school and other
institutions to minimize noise
and safety impacts.

Goal 12.1 Ensure adequate parking is
made available to City
residents, visitors, and
businesses.

Consistent. Parking associated with new development within the Project Site would be subject to existing parking requirements set forth in Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code and would be subject to review and approval by the City of Anaheim Planning Department.

The Project includes allowances for thousands of parking spaces for theme park guests, hotel guests, and cast members in various locations throughout the Project Site. The West Parking Area allows up to 16,700 parking spaces, the East Parking Area allows up to 17,600 spaces (up to 5,000 of which are permitted to be developed in the Theme Park District), the Southeast District allows up to 5,100 spaces, the Theme Park District allows up to 12,230 spaces (including up to 9,930 spaces for hotel uses and 2,300 spaces for administrative uses), and the parking overlay at HCML would allow up to 5,700 parking spaces. The Disney ARSP Properties would be subject to the parking provisions of the ARSP zoning, as under the current entitlement unless developed subject to the Theme Park or Parking Overlays. In total, the Project Site could provide up to 57,330 parking spaces for The Disneyland Resort guests and cast members in addition to any parking provided at the Disney ARSP Properties.

Disney actively manages parking demand for guests and cast members Policy 1 Assess the adequacy of
existing or proposed on- and
off-street parking as needed,
especially in urban and
commercial areas, to ensure
that an adequate supply is
provided.

CONSISTENCY OF THE PROJECT WITH THE

GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Goal or Policy Consistency Analysis
and provides programs and financial incentives to encourage cast members not to drive a vehicle to The Disneyland Resort. Disney parking facilities incorporate aesthetic design features and visual and acoustic screening to the City’s satisfaction and provide bicycle parking according to City requirements.

Policy 5 Encourage the use of welldesigned, aestheticallyenhanced parking structures as an alternative to large,
expansive surface parking
lots.

Consistent. Future development of parking areas, including parking structures, would be subject to requirements set forth in the Design Plans of the DRSP and ARSP, as applicable, intended to enhance the visual appearance of parking areas. Specifically, the Design Plans identify parking area design requirements including the location of parking areas to the rear or side of buildings, and design guidelines for parking structures to both enhance the exterior appearance of the parking structure and conceal views of cars inside the structures. The Design Plans also identify required setbacks from adjacent public street rights-of-way and require a minimum amount of landscaping within the setback areas, including large-scale materials planted according the layered landscape principles details in the Design Plans.

Policy 6 Encourage businesses to
provide bicycle parking
facilities such as bike racks
and lockers to promote
bicycling.

Consistent. Disney would continue to implement and administer a TDM program for all cast members. The Project would continue to implement a variety of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future cast member commute options, including, continued provision of bicycle parking and amenities
TABLE C-1

RECOMMENDED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
No. Location Recommended Improvement Improvement Trigger [a] Feasible Intersection Improvements [b]

11. Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way Add WBL, restripe WBT to shared WBT/R and eliminate north leg crosswalk Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, or at the Southeast District.

12. Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue Re-program the traffic signal to double-service the WBL turn lane to reduce WBL queuing Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

14. Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue Add NBL, SBL Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

16. Clementine Street & Katella Avenue Add SBL Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, or at the Southeast District.

22. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue
Lengthen SBL and WBL turn
pockets to accommodate queues
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

Improvements Subject to Caltrans Review or Approval [c]

10. Harbor Boulevard & Manchester Avenue Lengthen SBL turn pocket Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area or Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area.

21. Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps /Manchester Avenue Add NBL and reprogram signal
for lead-lag left-turn operation
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, or at the Southeast District.

25. Manchester Avenue / I-5 Southbound Ramps & Katella Avenue Restripe NB Approach to 1L, 2R
and remove split phase
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

Notes:
[a] Net trip generation estimates would be based on the trip rates Identified in Table 10 or the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual.

Peak hour public trips represent vehicle trips made from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. by resort guests. [b] Feasible improvements are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.[c] These improvements require Caltrans review or approval to be implemented, and therefore cannot be guaranteed by the City.

TABLE C-1 (CONT'D)

RECOMMENDED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
No. Location Improvement Trigger [a]
Operational Improvement Funding

7. Harbor Boulevard & Ball Road Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips to or from HCML.

12. Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

14. Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

18. Anaheim Boulevard & Ball Road Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips to or from HCML.

22. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

Intersections Subject to Access Analysis [d]

2. Flore Street / West Place & Ball Road Proposed development generating any net new peak hour vehicle trips to or from this access point. [e]

6. Ox Road / Cast Place & Ball Road Proposed development generating any net new public peak hour vehicle trips to or from this access point.

13. Harbor Boulevard & Convention Way / Toy Story Parking Proposed development generating at least 100 net new public peak hour vehicle trips to or from this access point.15. Clementine Street & Disney Way Proposed development generating at least 100 net new
public peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area or Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area.

16. Clementine Street & Katella Avenue Proposed development generating at least 100 net new public peak hour vehicle trips to or from this access point.

Notes:
[a] Net trip generation estimates would be based on the trip rates Identified in Table 10 or the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual.

Peak hour public trips represent vehicle trips made from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. by resort guests. [d] An access analysis would examine level of service (LOS) and queuing at the public vehicular access points for a given development and identify any necessary improvements for proper functioning of those access points, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. [e] At this location, the access analysis would include consideration of adding an additional access point to the Ball Cast Member Lot on Ball Road.

TABLE C-2

OTHER TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
No. Project Design Feature Timing

1. Install pedestrian signal on Walnut Street at Magic Way. To be installed upon closure of Magic Way to public through traffic.2. Install Class I Bike Path on the east side of Walnut Street from Ball Road to Katella Avenue. To be installed prior to final Building and Zoning Inspection for cumulative development of at least 10,000 square feet in the southwestern portion of the Theme Park District (south of Paradise Way and west of the Paradise Pier Hotel parking structure).3.

Install Class I Bike Path on the north side of Disney Way between Clementine Street Anaheim Boulevard, a Class I Bike Path on the west side of Clementine Street between Alro Way and Disney Way, and a bicycle parking facility in the East Parking Area and/or the adjacent Parking Overlay.

To be installed with construction of a parking structure or transportation facility, whichever is earlier, at the East Parking Area or the Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area.

4. Install pedestrian bridge(s) over Harbor Boulevard with public access to/from the sidewalk on Harbor Boulevard. [a] To be installed with the construction of a parking structure or transportation facility at the East Parking Area or the Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area in connection with the construction and prior to the operation of parking structures and/or a substantial increase in surface spaces or substantial change in operation of those spaces in the East Parking Area and/or the adjacent Parking Overlay.

5. Install traffic signal control at the intersection of Manchester Avenue / Clementine Street & Alro Way. [b] To be installed when signal warrants indicate it would be needed on the basis of an access analysis conducted for proposed development within the East Parking Area or Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area.

6. Provide in-lieu contribution and dedicate right-of-way adjacent to the Project Site on Ball Road and Haster Street for proposed Class II Bicycle Lanes on those streets.

Fee and dedication to be provided for each street prior to receipt of final Building and Zoning Inspection for cumulative development of at least 10,000 square feet on adjacent Disney property (northernmost portions of the Theme Park District for Ball Road, in the Southeast District for Haster Street).

7. Install traffic signal control at the existing driveway to the Southeast District on Haster Street south of Katella Avenue. [b] To be installed when signal warrants indicate it would be needed on the basis of an access analysis conducted for proposed development within the Southeast District or the Theme Park East Overlay.

8. Widen Katella Avenue to four westbound lanes along Disney's property adjacent to the Theme Park District from Disneyland Drive to approximately 800 feet west of Harbor Boulevard.

To be widened prior to receipt of final Building and Zoning Inspection for cumulative development of at least 10,000 square feet in the southwestern portion of the Theme Park District or development generating at least 50 net new public trips at the East Parking Area, the Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, the Southeast District, or the Theme Park East Overlay.

9. Widen Katella Avenue to four eastbound lanes along Disney's property adjacent to the Southeast District (from approximately 700 feet west of Clementine Street to approximately 400 feet east of Clementine Street).

To be widened prior to receipt of final Building and Zoning Inspection for cumulative development of at least 10,000 square feet in the Southeast District.

Notes:
[a] The Project would include at least one and up to three bridges between Manchester Avenue and Disney Way.[b] This action would be subject to a traffic signal warrant analysis.

Appendix J-2
Operational Traffic Analysis

OPERATIONAL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

FOR THE

DISNEYLANDFORWARD PROJECT

ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 2023

PREPARED FOR
WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S., INC.

PREPARED BY

OPERATIONAL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

FOR THE

DISNEYLANDFORWARD PROJECT

ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
August 2023
Prepared for:

WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S., INC.

Prepared by:

GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.
555 W. 5th Street, Suite 3375
Los Angeles, California 90013
(213) 683-0088
Ref: J1268h
Table of Contents
Executive Summary

1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location ........................................................................................................... 2 Currently Approved Development ............................................................................... 3 Project Description ....................................................................................................... 5 Prior Environmental Analysis ....................................................................................... 13 Analysis Methodology and Scope ............................................................................... 15 Analysis Scenarios ....................................................................................................... 16 Organization of Report ................................................................................................. 17

2. Project Setting .................................................................................................................... 31 Existing Street System ................................................................................................. 31 Public Transit System .................................................................................................. 35 Pedestrian Infrastructure .............................................................................................. 36 Bicycle Infrastructure ................................................................................................... 37 Existing Traffic Volumes and Operating Conditions .................................................... 39

3. Future Year Traffic Forecasts ............................................................................................ 53 Future without Project Traffic Volumes........................................................................ 53 Project Traffic – Land Use Development ..................................................................... 54 Project Traffic – Infrastructure Modifications ............................................................... 57 Future with Project Traffic Volumes ............................................................................. 61

4. Future Traffic Operations .................................................................................................. 79 ICU Analysis ................................................................................................................ 79 Caltrans Intersection HCM Analysis ...........................................................................81 Intersection Queues ....................................................................................................81 Street Segments .........................................................................................................82

5. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation ...................................................................................95 Pedestrian Paths of Travel .........................................................................................95 Project Effects on Pedestrian Infrastructure ...............................................................96 Project Effects on Bicycle Infrastructure .....................................................................97

Table of Contents, cont.

6. Transportation Improvements ...........................................................................................99 Intersection Modifications Considered Based on ICU Analysis .................................99 Modifications Considered at Caltrans Intersections ...................................................103 Modifications Considered for Intersection Queues ....................................................104 Street Segments .........................................................................................................107 Recommended Transportation Improvements ...........................................................108 Other Transportation Improvements...........................................................................108 DRSP and ARSP Mitigation Measures and Project Design Features .......................109

7. Project Construction ..........................................................................................................122

References
Appendix A: Disneyland Resort Specific Plan & Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Project Design Features & Mitigation Measures
Appendix B: Traffic Counts
Appendix C: Intersection Lane Configurations
Appendix D: Intersection Capacity Utilization Worksheets Appendix E: Highway Capacity Manual Worksheets
Appendix F: Trip Generation
List of Figures
NO.
1 Local Vicinity and Existing Specific Plan Designations ................................................. 18 2 DRSP and Disney ARSP Properties ............................................................................ 19 3 Current DRSP Districts ................................................................................................. 20 4 Proposed Development Districts and Overlays ............................................................. 21 5 Roadway Modifications and Vehicular Circulation Plan ................................................ 22 6 Proposed Pedestrian Circulation ................................................................................... 23 7 Guest Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Points ............................................................ 24 8 Analyzed Project Land Use Scenario ............................................................................ 25 9 Study Area and Analyzed Intersections ........................................................................ 26 10 Roadway Classifications ............................................................................................... 41 11 Public Transit ................................................................................................................ 42 12 Existing and Planned Resort-Area Bicycle Infrastructure ............................................. 43 13 Existing Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ................................................... 44 14 Future without Project Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ............................. 62 15 Regional Trip Distribution .............................................................................................. 65 16 Net Land Use Shifts Peak Hour Intersection Volumes .................................................. 66 17 Clementine Street & Gene Autry Way Shifts Peak Hour Intersection Volumes ............ 69 18 Future with Project Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Volumes .................................. 72

List of Tables
NO.
1 Currently Permitted Development Summary ................................................................. 27 2 Proposed Permitted Development Summary ................................................................ 28 3 List of Analyzed Intersections ....................................................................................... 29 4 List of Analyzed Street Segments ................................................................................. 30 5 Existing Intersection Operating Conditions
Intersection Capacity Utilization Methodology ......................................................... 47 6 Existing Caltrans Intersection Operating Conditions
Highway Capacity Manual Methodology ................................................................. 49 7 Street Segment Daily Capacity Assumptions ............................................................... 50 8 Existing Street Segment Daily Operating Conditions ................................................... 51 9 Future Street Segment Daily Traffic Volume Forecasts ................................................ 75 10 Trip Generation Estimates – Future with Project Conditions ......................................... 78 11 Future Intersection Operating Conditions
Intersection Capacity Utilization Methodology ........................................................ 84 12 Future Caltrans Intersection Operating Conditions
Highway Capacity Manual Methodology ................................................................ 86 13 Future Conditions Queuing .......................................................................................... 87 14 Future Street Segment Daily Operating Conditions ..................................................... 90 15 Future Street Segment Peak Hour Operating Conditions ............................................ 93 16 Future Intersection Operating Conditions and Modifications Considered Intersection Capacity Utilization Methodology ........................................................ 114 17 Future Caltrans Intersection Operating Conditions and Modifications Considered Highway Capacity Manual Methodology ................................................................ 115 18 Future Conditions Queuing and Modifications Considered .......................................... 116 19 Recommended Intersection Improvements ................................................................. 119 20 Other Transportation Improvements ............................................................................ 121

Acronyms and Definitions
Applicant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.

ARSP Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2
ARSP SEIR Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340, Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
ARTIC Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center ART Anaheim Resort Transportation
ATAM Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
City City of Anaheim
City Guidelines City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies Disney Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.

Disney ARSP Properties Properties within the ARSP area owned or leased by the Applicant or other subsidiaries of the Walt Disney Company
Disney Property or Property or properties within the DRSP or among the Disney ARSP Properties Properties
DR EIR Final Environmental Impact Report for the Disneyland Resort EIR No. 311 and Addendum
DRSP Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1
EIR Environmental Impact Report
General Plan Circulation City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element Element
HCM Highway Capacity Manual
HCML Harbor Cast Member Lot located at 333 W. Ball Road HOV High-occupancy-vehicle
I-5 Interstate 5
ICU Intersection capacity utilization
LOS Level of service
MCML Manchester Cast Member Lot located at 1515 S. Manchester Avenue, 1585 S. Manchester Avenue, and 1530 S. Harbor
Boulevard
Metro Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority MM Mitigation measure
MPAH Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways
OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority
OCTAM Orange County Transportation Analysis Model
O-D Traffic Traffic with an origin or destination within a defined area Pass-Through Traffic Traffic that passes through a defined area without stopping PDF’s Project design features
Project DisneylandForward Project
Project Site The DRSP and Disney ARSP Properties
ROW Right-of-way
sf square feet
SR State Route

Acronyms and Definitions, cont.

Superblock The area bounded by Harbor Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Haster Street, and Orangewood Avenue
TAZ Traffic analysis zone
TDM Transportation Demand Management
Toy Story Lot Surface parking lot located at 1900 S. Harbor Boulevard; also referred to as the Future Expansion District
V/C Ratio Volume to capacity ratio
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
Executive Summary
This report presents the operational traffic analysis conducted for the DisneylandForward Project (“Project”) proposed by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. (“Applicant” or “Disney”) in the City of Anaheim (“City”). The Project would allow continued, long-term growth of The Disneyland® Resort by allowing the transfer of uses permitted under The Disneyland Resort Project to other areas of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (“DRSP”) and properties within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (“ARSP”) area owned or leased by Disney or other subsidiaries of The Walt Disney Company (“Disney ARSP Properties,” and, collectively with Disney’s properties in the DRSP, “Disney Property” or “Disney Properties”). These areas are or will be considered to be part of The Disneyland Resort Project as modified by the Project.

The Project would not increase the amount of development square footage or hotel rooms currently allowed in the DRSP and analyzed in Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) No. 311, which the City certified in 1993, or the number of hotel rooms currently allowed in the ARSP and analyzed in Supplemental EIR No. 340, which the City certified in 2012. However, the Project would permit an increase of 4,376 theme park-related parking spaces in the ARSP.

The Project would require, among other things, approval of modifications to the DRSP, ARSP, City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element (City, June 2018) (“General Plan Circulation Element”), and Master Plan of Arterial Highways (Orange County Transportation Authority [“OCTA”], 2017) (“MPAH”). The City is preparing Subsequent EIR No. 352 to analyze the Project’s potentially significant impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), California Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. CEQA Transportation Analysis for the DisneylandForward Project (Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc., August 2023) has been prepared to be included in the Subsequent EIR analysis. This analysis has been prepared at the request of the City to provide an operational traffic analysis apart from the analysis now required by CEQA.

ES-1

PROJECT LOCATION
The Project is located entirely within an area known as The Anaheim Resort®, a 1,078-acre portion of the City especially designated by the City’s General Plan for Commercial Recreation land uses and intended to provide for tourist and entertainment-related industries, such as theme parks, hotels, tourist-oriented retail, movie theaters, and other visitor-serving facilities. The Anaheim Resort is located 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles, seven miles northwest of Santa Ana, and just north of Garden Grove in central Orange County. The Anaheim Resort includes three specific plan areas: DRSP, ARSP, and Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1. A map of the Project vicinity is provided in Figure ES-1, Local Vicinity and Existing Specific Plan Designations.

Project Site
The Project Site includes the entirety of the DRSP area (i.e., The Disneyland Resort, including the existing Theme Park, Hotel, Parking, and Future Expansion Districts) and the following Disney ARSP Properties:
 1515 S. Manchester Avenue (currently used as the Manchester Cast Member1 Lot [“MCML”])
 1585 S. Manchester Avenue (currently occupied by an office building and also currently used as the MCML)
 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard (currently used as the MCML)  1900 S. Harbor Boulevard (currently used as the Toy Story Parking Lot [“Toy Story Lot”])  333 W. Ball Road (currently used as the Harbor Cast Member Lot [“HCML”])  1717 Disneyland Drive (Paradise Pier Hotel)
The properties located at 1515 S. Manchester Avenue, 1585 S. Manchester Avenue, and 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard are collectively referred to as MCML. All Disney ARSP Properties are owned and operated by Disney with the exception of the Paradise Pier Hotel, where the hotel is owned 1 Cast Member is a term used by Disney for an employee of The Disneyland Resort.

ES-2
and operated by Disney and the underlying land is owned and ground leased by a third party to Disney. The Project Site also covers areas identified in the General Plan Circulation Element as planned extensions of Gene Autry Way between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street and Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, portions of which are outside the Anaheim Resort. A map of the Project Site is provided in Figure ES-2, DRSP and Disney ARSP Properties.

CURRENTLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT
Development at the Project Site is currently governed by the DRSP and the ARSP as summarized in Table ES-1, Currently Permitted Development Summary.

Permitted DRSP Development
The environmental impacts of The Disneyland Resort Project, including the DRSP, were analyzed in EIR No. 311, which was certified by the City of Anaheim in 1993 along with the adoption of Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0067. In 1996, in conjunction with an amendment to The Disneyland Resort Project, the City Council approved an Addendum to EIR No. 311, including a Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 0067. The prior CEQA review for The Disneyland Resort Project is referred to as the “DR EIR” in this report. The Disneyland Resort Project currently allows the following development:
 Theme Park District: Up to 6,850,000 square feet (“sf”) of theme park uses, up to 1,025 hotel rooms, and up to 475,000 sf of administration buildings with up to 2,300 associated parking spaces
 Hotel District: Up to 5,600 hotel rooms (including the 1,025 hotel rooms allowed in the Theme Park District), up to 300,000 sf of retail/restaurant uses, up to 9,930 parking spaces, and up to 200,000 sf of meeting rooms/convention space  Theme Park District/Hotel District: Up to 350,000 sf of the theme park square footage allowed in the Theme Park District may be developed as a retail entertainment center in the Hotel District
 Parking District, East Parking Area: Up to 17,600 parking spaces, including up to 5,000 parking spaces that may be located in the Theme Park District ES-3
 Parking District, West Parking Area: Up to 16,700 parking spaces  Future Expansion District: Up to 5,100 parking spaces As of the date of the Notice of Preparation of Subsequent EIR No. 352 for the DisneylandForward Project, October 21, 2021, Disney has developed approximately 45% of entitled square footage of theme park space within the Disneyland and Disney California Adventure theme parks, 2,342 hotel rooms, and approximately 28,436 guest and cast parking spaces, along with various other components of the allowed development. As shown in Table ES-1, Disney has remaining entitlements within the DRSP area to develop approximately 3,657,115 sf of theme park, 3,258 hotel rooms, and 23,194 guest and cast parking spaces, along with various other components of development. Figure ES-3, Current DRSP Districts, shows the existing DRSP Districts.

Permitted ARSP Development
The City analyzed the environmental impacts of the ARSP Project in Master Environmental Impact Report No. 313, which the City certified in 1994, along with the adoption of Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C. In December 2012, the City certified Supplemental EIR No. 340 in support of the approval of Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Project (“ARSP SEIR”). As detailed in Table ES-1, the ARSP as amended allows development on Disney ARSP Properties of up to 75 or 50 hotel rooms per gross acre with approval of a Final Site Plan as indicated below:
 Up to 1,116 hotel rooms on 1515 S. Manchester Avenue, 1585 S. Manchester Avenue, and 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard
 Up to 3,348 hotel rooms at 1900 S. Harbor Boulevard
 Up to 534 hotel rooms at 333 W. Ball Road
 Up to 564 hotel rooms at 1717 S. Disneyland Drive
Section 18.116.070 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code also allows the development of theme parks, entertainment venues, and transportation facilities on these properties with approval of a conditional use permit.

ES-4

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project would not increase the amount of previously approved theme park square footage or hotel rooms. However, the Project would permit an increase of 4,376 theme park-related parking spaces in the ARSP. It would also allow transfer of theme park, hotel, and other retail, dining, and entertainment uses, and parking permitted in the Disneyland Resort Project to Disney Properties and provide for administrative review of Disney’s projects. The Project would require, among other things, the approval of amendments to the DRSP, ARSP, General Plan Circulation Element, and MPAH. Figure ES-4, Proposed Development Districts and Overlays, shows a map of the proposed DRSP districts and ARSP zoning overlays within the Project site. Table ES-2, Proposed Permitted Development Summary, summarizes the proposed development limits with the Project.

DRSP Amendments
The Project proposes to reallocate allowable land uses within the Theme Park District (389 acres), the Parking District (57.1 acres), and the Southeast District (24.7 acres). The former Hotel District would become part of the Theme Park District and the Future Expansion District would become the Southeast District.

The Project would allow Disney to move a portion of the unused approved theme park square footage to the existing Hotel District, which would become part of the new expanded Theme Park District of the DRSP. The Project also would allow Disney to move a portion of the unused approved theme park square footage to the existing Future Expansion District, which would become the Southeast District of the DRSP, and to the proposed Theme Park East and West Overlays of the ARSP.

Under the Project, Disney could develop cumulatively up to 6,850,000 previously approved sf of theme park uses in the DRSP, including up to 6,850,000 previously approved sf in the expanded Theme Park District if all theme park square footage were developed in the expanded Theme Park District. Disney could also develop a portion of this previously approved theme park square footage in the newly renamed Southeast District (up to 390,000 sf), in the proposed Theme Park East Overlay (up to 840,000 sf), and in the proposed Theme Park West Overlay (up to 80,000 square feet). If theme park square footage is developed in the Southeast District and Theme Park ES-5
East and West Overlays, an equivalent amount of theme park square footage would be removed from the allotment for the Theme Park District, such that the maximum theme park square footage would not exceed 6,850,000 sf.

Similarly, the Project would allow Disney to move the unused portion of the hotel room approvals from the existing Hotel District to the existing Theme Park District or the existing Future Expansion District, the newly renamed Southeast District. Under the Project, Disney could develop cumulatively up to 5,600 previously approved hotel rooms in the DRSP, including a combination of up to 5,600 previously approved hotel rooms in the expanded Theme Park District if all hotel rooms were developed in the expanded Theme Park District and up to 1,852 previously approved hotel rooms in the newly renamed Southeast District.

The DRSP also would be amended consistent with the General Plan amendments described below, including changes to the circulation system.

ARSP Amendments
The Project would create a Theme Park East Overlay within the ARSP for the existing Toy Story Parking Lot and a Theme Park West Overlay within the ARSP for the existing Paradise Pier Hotel.

The Theme Park Overlay would allow Disney to develop theme park uses on these properties concurrently with the development of theme park uses on the expanded Theme Park District or the Southeast District of the DRSP. With the Project, Disney could develop up to 840,000 sf of previously approved theme park uses within the Theme Park East Overlay and up to 80,000 sf of previously approved theme park uses within the Theme Park West Overlay for a cumulative total of up to 920,000 sf of previously approved theme park uses in these Overlays. The Anaheim Municipal Code currently allows theme park uses in these Overlay areas with approval of a conditional use permit.

The Project would create a Parking Overlay within the ARSP for the Disney ARSP Properties located at 1515 S. Manchester Avenue, 1585 S. Manchester Avenue, 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard, and 333 W. Ball Road. The Project would increase the number of permitted theme park parking spaces in the Parking Overlay at 333 W. Ball Road, permitting up to 5,700 parking spaces (this includes 1,324 existing spaces plus 4,376 additional spaces). The Parking Overlay would permit ES-6
development of the same type of parking and transportation facilities allowed under Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.114.080 for the East Parking Area of the DRSP Parking District, and the same type of back-of-house uses, limited retail, and dining and entertainment uses allowed under Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.114.060 for the Theme Park District of the DRSP.

Disney could also develop hotel rooms in these Overlays as permitted by the existing ARSP and summarized in Table ES-2.

The ARSP also would be amended consistent with the General Plan amendments described below, including changes to the circulation system.

Vehicular Circulation
Convenient automobile access to The Disneyland Resort is an essential component of the success of The Disneyland Resort Project. Most visitors come to the Project area by automobile or bus, and it is especially important that the visitors’ experience be pleasant upon both arrival and departure. To assure this, the DRSP requires numerous improvements to the circulation system designed to enhance the visitor experience and ensure a safe and efficient transportation system for residents and employees in the area.

Improvements for area roads implemented and to be implemented in connection with The Disneyland Resort Project include enhanced connections with Interstate 5, improvements to the arterial and secondary road system, and construction of parking facilities to accommodate visitors to The Disneyland Resort and the Anaheim Convention Center. Many of these improvements have been constructed since approval of The Disneyland Resort Project in 1993. The Project would continue to implement physical improvements to the local transportation system envisioned by mitigation measures in the prior EIRs to enhance connectivity, access, and safety.

The proposed vehicular circulation system is depicted in Figure ES-5, Roadway Modifications and Vehicular Circulation Plan. General vehicular access would continue to be provided from I-5 and the following signalized intersections under the jurisdiction of the City of Anaheim: Ball Road & Disneyland Drive, Katella Avenue & Disneyland Drive, Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way, Convention Way & Harbor Boulevard, Clementine Street & Katella Avenue, Clementine Street & ES-7
Disney Way, Manchester Avenue & Harbor Boulevard, and Ball Road & Harbor Boulevard. The Project requests the following modifications to the City’s Circulation Transportation System as shown in Figure ES-5:

Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways Amendment.  Removal of the planned future extensions of Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue and Gene Autry Way between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street, which are planned through the Southeast District of the DRSP and the adjacent Theme Park East Overlay in the ARSP
 Reclassification of Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard from a six-lane Major Arterial to a four-lane Primary Arterial General Plan Amendment.
 Approval of an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element and the City’s Bicycle Master Plan to remove the Class I Bike Path in the Southern California Edison right-ofway (“ROW”) between Harbor Boulevard and Anaheim Boulevard and add a Class I Bike Path on the north side of Disney Way between Clementine Street and Anaheim Boulevard  Approval of an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element and the City’s Bicycle Master Plan to add a Class I Bike Path on the west side of Clementine Street between Alro Way and Disney Way (limits subject to change based on determination of proposed dedication)
 Removal of the planned future extensions of Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, and Gene Autry Way between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street, which are planned through the Southeast District of the DRSP and the adjacent Theme Park East Overlay in the ARSP
 Approval of an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element and the City’s Planned Roadway Network map (Figure C-1 of the General Plan Circulation Element) to reflect the following intersection lane configurations:
o At Harbor Boulevard & Convention Way, provide two left-turn lanes, one shared through/right-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane on the eastbound approach and one left-turn lane, one shared through/right-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane on the westbound approach (consistent with existing configuration)2

2 The final intersection configuration is subject to change and will be finalized when a site-specific access analysis is conducted for the Theme Park East Overlay.

ES-8
o At Haster Street & Gene Autry Way, provide a single shared left-turn/through/rightturn lane for the eastbound approach and three left-turn lanes and two right-turn lanes for the westbound approach. The northbound approach would be equipped with a right-turn signal overlapping with the westbound left-turn signal phase  Reclassification of Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard from a six-lane Major Arterial to a four-lane Primary Arterial (with no reduction to the width of the ultimate public ROW)
 Approval of an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element and the City’s Bicycle Master Plan to modify the classification of the planned bike facility on Walnut Street between Katella Avenue and Ball Road from Class II Bike Lanes to a Class I Bike Path on the east side of Walnut Street
Street Abandonment.
 Abandonment of public ROW on Magic Way between Walnut Street and Disneyland Drive (pedestrian and emergency access would be provided)
 Abandonment of public ROW on Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and the southern property line of the proposed Southeast District of the DRSP  Abandonment of public ROW on Hotel Way north of Disney Way Other Improvements.
 Installation of a pedestrian signal on Walnut Street at Magic Way  Installation of a Class I Bike Path with a single two-way, off-street, shared-use pathway for pedestrians and bicycles with a minimum width of 10 feet3 on the east side of Walnut Street from Ball Road to Katella Avenue
 Installation of (1) a Class I Bike Path with a minimum width of 10 feet on the north side of Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard4 and Clementine Street; (2) a single two-way, off-street, shared-use pathway for pedestrians and bicycles with a minimum width of 10 feet on the west side of Clementine Street between Alro Way and Disney Way; and (3) a bike parking facility in the East Parking Area and/or the Parking Overlay just north of the East Parking Area
 Provide in-lieu contribution and dedicate right-of-way adjacent to the Project Site on Ball Road and Haster Street for proposed Class II Bicycle Lanes on those streets 3 Where utility relocations are not feasible, the pathway may include brief sections with a minimum width of 8 feet. 4 The portion between Anaheim Boulevard and the I-5 southbound off-ramp is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Disney would work with Caltrans to approve and implement this Bike Path.

ES-9
 Installation of traffic signal control at the existing driveway to the Southeast District on Haster Street south of Katella Avenue5
 Installation of traffic signal control at the intersection of Manchester Avenue / Clementine Street & Alro Way6
 Construction of at least one and up to three grade-separated pedestrian bridges over Harbor Boulevard north of Disney Way and south of Manchester Avenue with public access to/from the sidewalk on Harbor Boulevard
 Widen Katella Avenue to four westbound lanes along Disney’s property adjacent to the Theme Park District from Disneyland Drive to approximately 800 feet west of Harbor Boulevard
 Widen Katella Avenue to four eastbound lanes along Disney’s property adjacent to the Southeast District (from approximately 700 feet west of Clementine Street to approximately 400 feet east of Clementine Street)
Trip Reduction Measures
The Project would continue to implement a number of trip reduction measures, including those that directly support alternative means of transportation like transit, bicycle travel, and pedestrian movement. Consistent with the originally approved Disneyland Resort Project and ARSP Project, this Project would include pedestrian linkages between land uses and areas of the Project Site, including landscaped walkways, promenades, and plazas. To further enhance pedestrian circulation and connectivity between land uses, the Project would include opportunities for construction of at least one and up to three grade-separated pedestrian bridges over Harbor Boulevard north of Disney Way and south of Manchester Avenue and up to two additional pedestrian bridges over Disneyland Drive.

The Project would continue to implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (“TDM”) program for all cast members, as detailed in Chapter 6. 5 This action would be subject to a traffic signal warrant analysis. 6 This action would be subject to a traffic signal warrant analysis.

ES-10
Pedestrian Circulation
The development of new attractions and hotel rooms and construction of the peripheral public parking facilities and mass transit systems discussed in this section have increased pedestrian activity in both the Project Site and the surrounding Anaheim Resort. This has enhanced the urban character of the Project Site and requires that facilities be provided to meet the needs of pedestrians.

Figure ES-6, Proposed Pedestrian Circulation, illustrates the existing and proposed pedestrian circulation system within the Project Site and surrounding area. Pedestrian routes, pedestrian and vehicular access points, and approximate pedestrian bridge locations are identified in Figure ES7, Guest Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Points. The primary destinations of pedestrians within the surrounding area will be:
 The Theme Park District
 The Southeast District
 East and West Parking Areas within the Parking District  The Disneyland Resort hotels within the Theme Park District and Southeast District  The Theme Park Overlays and Parking Overlays of the ARSP  Hotels, restaurants, businesses, and parking in the surrounding Anaheim Resort  The Anaheim Convention Center
 Downtown Disney
 Theme Parks
Grade-separated pedestrian bridges serve as a key connector over public street ROW, connecting users from one side of the street to the other without impeding traffic flow. Gradeseparated pedestrian bridges currently exist over Disneyland Drive and Magic Way. The Project may construct two additional pedestrian bridges over Disneyland Drive between Magic Way and Katella Avenue. The Project also will construct at least one and up to three grade-separated pedestrian bridges over Harbor Boulevard north of Disney Way and south of Manchester Avenue in connection with the construction and prior to the operation of parking structures and/or a ES-11
substantial increase in surface spaces or substantial change in operation of those spaces in the DRSP Parking District (East Parking Area) and/or the adjacent Parking Overlay. As an example, those Cast Members parking in existing surface spaces in the Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area currently take a shuttle to the theme parks and no pedestrian access to Harbor Boulevard is permitted until such time that a pedestrian bridge is constructed. Approximate pedestrian bridge locations are identified in Figure ES-7.

An existing pedestrian route running east-west between Harbor Boulevard and Disneyland Drive currently serves as the main connection to the entrances of Disneyland and Disney California Adventure, including ticket booths and entry gates. To the west of the theme park entrances, this walkway becomes the retail, dining and entertainment district known as Downtown Disney, continuing westward on a grade-separated pedestrian bridge constructed over the lowered Disneyland Drive and currently ending near The Disneyland Resort hotels west of Disneyland Drive. Pedestrian-friendly furnishings, retail and dining uses, and landscaping exist all along this pedestrian route, which is, while generally open to the public, on private property and subject to Disney restrictions. Project implementation may include reconfiguration and/or replacement of the existing east-west pedestrian route, including the space currently devoted to central theme park ticketing and gate functions. With any such changes, a non-ticketed pedestrian route for eastwest circulation shall be provided through the Theme Park District connecting major destinations (theme parks, Downtown Disney, hotels, and parking facilities) to Harbor Boulevard and Walnut Street and would meet public safety size requirements.

ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY AND SCOPE
The DR EIR analyzed transportation impacts on the basis of level of service (“LOS”), but CEQA now requires that transportation analysis be based on vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”). Disney submitted CEQA Transportation Analysis for the DisneylandForward Project to analyze the transportation impacts as required by CEQA. The City’s Public Works Department, however, requires analysis using LOS and related methodologies outside of the CEQA process pursuant to City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (“City Guidelines”). This report analyzes only non-CEQA effects of the Project in accordance with the City Guidelines.

ES-12
Intersection deficiencies were identified based on either meeting the City’s sliding scale for Project-level increase to volume-to-capacity (“V/C”) ratio or causing or worsening LOS E or F conditions based on an intersection capacity utilization (“ICU”) analysis. Under the sliding scale criteria, the Project would result in a deficiency if it increased the intersection V/C ratio by 0.05 or more for an intersection operating at LOS C, by 0.03 or more for an intersection operating at LOS D, or by 0.01 or more for an intersection operating at LOS E or F.

Deficiencies at California Department of Transportation (“Caltrans”) intersections were identified if the intersection would operate at LOS E or F under the Highway Capacity Manual (“HCM”) methodology, which identifies average intersection delay in seconds per vehicle. Also, this report identifies any intersections where the Project would increase a turn pocket queue length, causing or lengthening an exceedance by at least 25 feet (approximately one car-length), also based on the HCM methodology.

Street segment analysis was conducted using daily segment traffic volumes. Those locations found to operate at LOS D or worse under Future with Project Conditions were further analyzed for peak hour operating conditions to determine whether the segments operate at acceptable conditions (LOS D or better).

FUTURE TRAFFIC FORECASTS
The non-CEQA traffic operations analysis was conducted under Existing Conditions and Future Conditions. The Existing Conditions provide a reference point for current operating conditions and are based on traffic counts collected in April 2022. The Future without Project Conditions analysis is based the ARSP SEIR “General Plan Buildout Year 2030 With Project Conditions.” Those conditions assume the DRSP and ARSP are developed according to the existing entitlements and that the roadway network is completed in accordance with the General Plan Circulation Element. The Future with Project Conditions modify the land use plan and roadway network in accordance with the specific components of the Project as described above.

ES-13
Project Traffic – Hotel and Parking
The Project would allow the transfer of uses already allowed under the DRSP to other Disney Properties. Development of hotels in newly permitted locations would result in the removal of hotel trips from the currently permitted locations (compared to baseline traffic forecasts that assume development in currently permitted locations) and the addition of hotel trips to newly permitted locations. While parking spaces do not intrinsically generate traffic, and the Project does not increase the permitted square footage for trip-generating uses such as theme park uses and hotels, a trip generation rate was developed for parking on a per-space basis and conservatively applied to the new parking permitted at HCML as if those parking spaces themselves generated trips. Development of theme park uses in new locations would not alter traffic conditions, because theme park parking would not be relocated from its previously analyzed location in the DR EIR.

A total of 16,396 daily hotel trips (including 723 during the morning peak hour and 1,289 during the afternoon peak hour), associated with 3,258 resort hotel rooms, were assumed to shift away from the current Hotel District along Disneyland Drive and toward the Southeast District and the Theme Park District along Ball Road. A total of 8,997 daily parking trips (including 690 during the morning peak hour and 450 during the afternoon peak hour) were assumed to be newly generated, associated with development of a 5,700-space parking structure at HCML.

Project Traffic – Gene Autry Way and Clementine Street Closures The removal of the planned extensions of Gene Autry Way and Clementine Street would result in redistribution of the traffic forecast to use those streets. The redistribution was estimated using ATAM and engineering judgment. The planned extensions bisect the major block bounded by Harbor Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Haster Street, and Orangewood Avenue (“Superblock”). Two components of traffic would be redistributed due to the Project’s removal of these extensions:
traffic passing through without stopping (“Pass-Through Traffic”) and traffic with an origin or destination within the Superblock (“O-D Traffic”). Both Pass-Through Traffic and O-D Traffic would be redistributed due to the Project’s removal of those planned streets.

Pass-Through Traffic was estimated based on ARSP SEIR forecasts of traffic at the planned intersection of Clementine Street & Gene Autry Way, an intersection through which all PassES-14 Through Traffic must travel. Since all pass-through routes would be eliminated with the removal of the planned extensions, all Pass-Through Traffic was reassigned to logical alternative routes, primarily using the four Superblock boundary streets.

O-D Traffic was estimated as the balance of the trips within the Superblock after removal of the Pass-Through Traffic. With the Project, all of the uses within the Superblock would remain permitted, but access to the interior of the Superblock would be limited to Harbor Boulevard at Convention Way, Katella Avenue at Clementine Street, and Haster Street at the existing driveway to the Southeast District. Some O-D Traffic is already assumed to use the former two access points under Future without Project Conditions, but the remainder was reassigned for Future with Project Conditions.

EXISTING OPERATING CONDITIONS
All 32 analyzed intersections currently operate within City standards (LOS D or better) during the morning and afternoon peak hours under Existing Conditions using the City’s ICU methodology.

Each of the nine intersections that include one or more Caltrans freeway ramps currently operate at LOS D or better during both peak hours using Caltrans’ HCM methodology.

Of the 38 analyzed street segments, 37 street segments currently operate at LOS C or better on a daily basis. One segment, Disneyland Drive from Ball Road to Magic Way, currently operates at LOS D on a daily basis.

FUTURE OPERATING CONDITIONS
Of the 32 analyzed intersections, 26 intersections would operate at LOS D or better during both the morning and afternoon peak hours under Future without Project Conditions using the ICU methodology. The Project would cause four intersections to worsen to LOS E or F from LOS D or better during one or both peak hours and would improve one intersection from LOS E or F to LOS D or better.

ES-15
Eight of nine intersections that include one or more Caltrans freeway ramps are forecast to operate at LOS D or better during both peak hours under Future without Project Conditions. The Project would cause the one location forecast to operate at LOS E to improve to LOS D and would cause one location forecast to operate at LOS D to worsen to LOS E under Future with Project Conditions.

There are 13 intersections that have one or more turn lanes where the Project would add at least 25 feet of queuing (approximately one car-length), causing or lengthening a turn pocket exceedance during one or both peak hours based on the 95th percentile queue length. Nine of the locations would also meet those criteria based on the 50th percentile queue length.

Of the 38 analyzed street segments, 20 street segments are forecast to operate at LOS C or better on a daily basis under Future without Project Conditions. The Project would cause four segments to worsen to LOS D or worse on a daily basis and would improve one segment from LOS D to LOS A. The 21 street segments operating at LOS D or worse on a daily basis were found to operate at LOS D or better during both peak hours under Future with Project Conditions.

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND PHASING
Intersection modifications were identified to address operational deficiencies resulting from the Project based on City criteria and standards. The severity of the deficiencies varies, as does the feasibility of improving them. Intersections located at Project access points will be subject to a focused access analysis if and when Project development is proposed that would result in 100 net new peak hour public vehicle trips taking access through those intersections. Several locations would continue to operate at LOS D, which is within the City’s General Plan standard and therefore may not warrant modification. The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations as part of the ARSP SEIR for two locations, as further improvement to those intersections was found to be infeasible. Several locations are at Caltrans ramp locations, and thus are outside of the City’s jurisdiction to approve changes.

Table ES-3, Recommended Intersection Improvements, summarizes improvements that were determined to be feasible and effective at deficient locations, along with operational improvements and intersection subject to access analyses. Table ES-3 also summarizes triggers for each ES-16
improvement. The triggers, most of which are tied to the generation of 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips, are designed such that the improvements would not be required upon development of a land use that does not generate trips (such as a new security booth or restrooms), but that they would be triggered upon development of the first substantive Project components that would contribute traffic to each location.

As shown in Table ES-3, the improvements fall under several basic categories:

1. Feasible intersection improvements, which can be implemented under the City’s jurisdiction without requiring approval from any third-party jurisdiction.

2. Improvements requiring Caltrans review or approval, which are located within or near Caltrans jurisdiction and, therefore, cannot be guaranteed by the City. Disney would work with Caltrans and the City to review and potentially implement these improvements.

3. Operational improvements, where there is no further feasible physical modification to the intersection. These would consist of providing funding to the City Traffic Engineer for operational improvements along the Harbor Boulevard corridor. The amount of this funding would be based on a 16.8% fair share of the cost of an improvement to the intersection of Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue that was determined to be infeasible due to right-of-way constraints (widening to provide an exclusive eastbound right-turn lane).

4. Intersections subject to access analyses, which includes all intersections located at Project access points. These access analyses would examine LOS and queueing at the public vehicular access points for a given development and identify any necessary improvements for proper functioning of the intersection, to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer.

In addition to the recommended transportation improvements identified in Table ES-3, the Project would be responsible for implementing the other transportation improvements identified in Table ES-4, Other Transportation Improvements. These features include one or more pedestrian bridges, a pedestrian signal on Walnut Street at Magic Way, bicycle paths on Disney Way, Clementine Street, and Walnut Street, widening Katella Avenue adjacent to Disney property, and installing traffic signal control at Project access points as necessary subject to an access analysis and meeting technical signal warrants. The Project would also continue to operate the Disneyland Resort’s TDM program.

ES-17
5 Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale
5 Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (DRSP)
Designated for future extension
in General Plan Circulation Element
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (HCSP)

LOCAL VICINITY AND EXISTING SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATIONS FIGURE ES-1
ES-18
Toy Story Parking Lot
1900 S. Harbor Bl
Manchester Cast Member Lot
1530 S. Harbor Bl
1515 S. Manchester Av
1585 S. Manchester Av
Harbor Cast Member Lot
333 W. Ball Rd
Paradise Pier Hotel
1717 S. Disneyland Dr
5 Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale

DRSP AND DISNEY ARSP PROPERTIES FIGURE
ES-2
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (DRSP)
Disney Owned or Leased Properties in ARSP
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (HCSP)
Other Specific Plan Areas
Designated for future extension
in General Plan Circulation Element
ES-19
Hotel
District
Theme Park
District
Parking District
West Parking
Area
Parking District
East Parking Area
District A
Future
Expansion District
Disneyland
Theme Park
Theme Park District
California Adventure
Theme Park
5 Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale
Theme Park District
Hotel District
Future Expansion District
District A
Parking District
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (HCSP)
Current Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Districts
Other Specific Plan Areas

CURRENT DRSP DISTRICTS FIGURE
ES-3
ES-20
Parking District
West Parking
Area
Parking
Overlay
District A
Southeast
District
Theme Park
East Overlay
Parking Overlay
Theme Park
West Overlay
Parking District
East Parking Area
Disneyland
Theme Park
Theme Park District
California Adventure
Theme Park
5 Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AND OVERLAYS FIGURE
ES-4
Theme Park District
Southeast District
District A
Parking District
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (HCSP)
Proposed DRSP Districts
Theme Park Overlay
Parking Overlay
Proposed ARSP Overlays
Other Specific Plan Areas
ES-21
Hotel Wy
Parking District
West Parking
Area
Parking
Overlay
District A
Southeast
District
Theme Park
East Overlay
Parking Overlay
Theme Park
West Overlay
Parking District
East Parking Area
Disneyland
Theme Park
Theme Park District
California Adventure
Theme Park
5 Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale

ROADWAY MODIFICATIONS AND VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN FIGURE ES-5
Removal of Planned Future Roadway Extensions as Part of Project (Existing right-of-way on Clementine Street north of Orangewood Avenue would remain as a local street)
DRSP and ARSP Right-of-Way Improvements (combination of completed and remaining to be completed with future development) Roadway Reclassification
Existing Theme Park Drop-Off Area
Proposed Theme Park Drop-Off Area (location is approximate) C Lane Configurations Modified Due to Removal of Gene Autry Way S Proposed Traffic Signal
I Feasible Improvements Proposed
NOTES:

1. More detailed information showing the remaining vehicular and other circulation improvements are described in SEIR 352 and are on file with the City.

2. Vehicular circulation fom Magic Way to Walnut Street is right-turn only. As part of the Project, Magic Way at Walnut Street will no longer provide vehicular access, except for emergency vehicles.

3. Disney Way to be reclassified from a 6-lane Primary Arterial to a 4-lane Major Arterial with no reduction in width of the ultimate public right-of-way.

Proposed Road Abandonment
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (DRSP)
Disney ARSP Properties
C C
S
S
I
I
I
I I
ES-22
Parking District
West Parking
Area
Parking
Overlay
District A
Southeast
District
Theme Park
East Overlay
Parking Overlay
Theme Park
West Overlay
Parking District
East Parking Area
Ball Rd
Magic Wy
Disney Wy
Manchester Ave Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av
Orangewood Av
West Pl
Cast Pl
West St
Vermont Av
Disneyland
Theme Park
Theme Park District
California Adventure
Theme Park
Convention Wy
Not to Scale

PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION FIGURE
ES-6
Public Pedestrian Route to be Removed
as part of Road Abandonment
Public Pedestrian Route
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (DRSP)
Disney ARSP Properties
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (HCSP)
Other Specific Plan Areas
NOTES:

1. Sidewalks are provided for all public streets unless shown on this exhbit.

Public sidewalks located outside of the boundaries of The Anaheim Resort are not shown on this exhibit.

2. Until parking structure is constructed in the East Parking Area, existing public sidewalk to remain on the north side of Disney Way, west of Clementine Street.

3. Existing public sidewalks to remain on Magic Way until road abandonment occurs.

4. Non-ticketed pedestrian routes for east-west circulation shall be provided through the Theme Park District connecting major destinations (theme parks, Downtown Disney, hotels, and parking facilities) to Harbor Boulevard, Walnut Street, and Disneyland Drive.

ES-23
Parking District
West Parking
Area
Parking
Overlay
District A
Theme Park
East Overlay
Parking Overlay
Theme Park
West Overlay
Parking District
East Parking Area
Southeast
District
Disneyland
Theme Park
Theme Park District
California Adventure
Theme Park
5 Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale

GUEST PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS FIGURE
ES-7
Pedestrian Access Point
Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Point
Vehicular Access Point
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (DRSP)
Disney ARSP Properties
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (HCSP)
Other Specific Plan Areas
NOTES:

1. Non-ticketed pedestrian routes for east-west circulation shall be provided through the Theme Park District connecting major destinations (theme parks, Downtown Disney, hotels, and parking facilities) to Harbor Boulevard, Walnut Street, and Disneyland Drive.

2. Potential locations of pedestrian bridges:
∙ Harbor Boulevard, between Manchester Avenue and Disney Way ∙ Disneyland Drive, between Magic Way and Katella Avenue ∙ Katella Avenue connecting the Anaheim Convention Center area to what is now Disney’s California Adventure theme park (EIR 311)

3. As of November 2021, there is bus/shuttle access, however, such access may be removed if a transit center is moved the DRSP Parking District East Parking Area or adjacent ARSP Parking Overlay.

4. The location of access points may be adjusted subject to the approval of the City Engineer.

ES-24
TABLE ES-1

CURRENTLY PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
Land Use Allowed by
Specific Plan
Existing Development
[a]
Remaining
Entitlement [a]
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan
Hotel District (97 acres)
Hotel Rooms 5,600 rooms 2,342 rooms [b] 3,258 rooms
Hotel Retail/Restaurant 300,000 sf 159,549 sf 140,451 sf Hotel Meeting Space 200,000 sf 161,220 sf 38,780 sf
Parking Spaces 9,930 spaces 5,885 spaces 4,045 spaces
Theme Park District (292 acres)
Theme Park 6,850,000 sf 3,192,885 sf [c] 3,657,115 sf
Administration Building 475,000 sf 305,430 sf 169,570 sf Administration Parking Spaces 2,300 spaces 1,545 spaces 755 spaces Parking District (57.1 acres)
East Parking Area 17,600 spaces 2,179 spaces [d] 15,421 spaces West Parking Area 16,700 spaces 16,298 spaces 402 spaces Future Expansion District (24.7 acres)
Parking Area 5,100 spaces 2,529 spaces 2,571 spaces
Total
7,825,000 sf
5,600 hotel rooms
51,630 parking spaces
3,819,084 sf
2,342 hotel rooms
28,436 parking spaces
4,005,916 sf
3,258 hotel rooms
23,194 parking spaces
Disney ARSP Properties
1515 S. Manchester Avenue
1585 S. Manchester Avenue
1530 S. Harbor Boulevard
(Manchester Cast Member Lot)
(14.88 acres)
1,116 hotel rooms
(75 rooms per gross acre or
75 rooms per lot or parcel,
whichever is greater)
Cast Member parking
(1,261 spaces - temporary
parking lot initially approved on
May 8, 2019, and an
approximately 67,424-sf office
building)
1,116 hotel rooms
1900 S. Harbor Boulevard
(Toy Story Lot)
(44.66 acres)
3,348 hotel rooms
(75 rooms per gross acre or
75 rooms per lot or parcel,
whichever is greater) [e]
Toy Story Parking Lot
(4,603 spaces - temporary
parking lot approved through
June 26, 2024)
3,348 hotel rooms
333 W. Ball Road
(Harbor Cast Member Lot)
(10.69 acres)
534 hotel rooms
(50 rooms per gross acre or
75 rooms per lot or parcel,
whichever is greater)
Cast Member parking
(1,324 spaces) 534 hotel rooms
1717 S. Disneyland Drive
(Paradise Pier Hotel)
(5.15 acres)
564 hotel rooms
(50 rooms per gross acre or
75 rooms per lot or parcel,
whichever is greater) [f]
Paradise Pier Hotel
(489 rooms and approximately
17,619 sf in ancillary
commercial uses)
45 hotel rooms
Notes:
sf = square feet.
[a] These numbers are as of the date of the Notice of Preparation, October 21, 2021; over the course of this environmental review process, these numbers may change due to ongoing development efforts based on current entitlements. [b] Existing hotel rooms include Vacation Ownership Resort (VOR) units at the Grand Californian Hotel and the Disneyland Hotel. [c] This amount includes the existing 246,702 sf of retail, dining, and entertainment in Downtown Disney as of the NOP. The DRSP allows up to 350,000 sf of retail, dining and entertainment sf in either the Theme Park or Hotel District. [d] This amount includes the exisitng 842 spaces in the Ball Cast Member Lot. The DRSP allows up to 5,000 parking spaces identified for the East Parking Area to be located in the Theme Park District. [e] Acreage for density excludes ultimate public right-of-way for Clementine Street and Gene Autry Way. [f] The Paradise Pier Hotel property is comprised of two parcels: a 4.48-acre parcel that includes 489 hotel rooms and a 0.67-acre property that is allowed 75 hotel rooms.

ES-25
TABLE ES-2

PROPOSED PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
Land Use Maximum Allowable Development
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan
Theme Park District (389 acres)
Hotel Rooms Up to 5,600 rooms [a]
Hotel Retail/Restaurant Up to 300,000 sf
Hotel Meeting Space Up to 200,000 sf
Parking for Hotel Uses Up to 9,930 spaces
Theme Park District Retail Entertainment Up to 350,000 sf [b] Theme Park and Back-of-House Uses Up to 6,850,000 sf [b,c] Administration Building 475,000 sf
Administration Building Parking 2,300 spaces
Theme Park Parking 5,000 spaces [d]
Parking District (57.1 acres)
East Parking Area Up to 17,600 spaces [d]
West Parking Area Up to 16,700 spaces
Southeast District (24.7 acres)
Theme Park Up to 390,000 sf [c]
Hotel Rooms Up to 1,852 rooms [a]
Parking 5,100 spaces
Total Maximum Allowable Development
7,825,000 sf
5,600 hotel rooms
51,630 parking spaces
Disney ARSP Properties [e]
Parking Overlay (25.57 acres) [f]
1515 S. Manchester Avenue, 1585 S. Manchester
Avenue, and 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard
(Manchester Cast Member Lot)
A portion of the parking spaces allocated
to the East Parking Area of the DRSP and
up to 1,116 hotel rooms
333 W. Ball Road
(Harbor Cast Member Lot)
Up to 5,700 parking spaces and
up to 534 hotel rooms [g]
Theme Park East Overlay (44.66 acres) [h]
1900 S. Harbor Boulevard
(Toy Story Lot)
Up to 840,000 sf of theme park uses and
up to 3,348 hotel rooms [c]
Theme Park West Overlay (5.15 acres)
1717 S. Disneyland Drive
(Paradise Pier Hotel)
Up to 80,000 sf of theme park uses and
up to 564 hotel rooms [c]
Notes:
sf = square feet.
[a] Up to 1,852 hotel rooms may be constructed in the Southeast District; however, an equivalent number of potential hotel rooms would be removed from the allotment for the Theme Park District, such that the maximum number of hotel rooms would not exceed 5,600. [b] Up to 350,000 sf of the theme park and back-of-house sf may be developed as retail, dining and entertainment sf. [c] Theme park sf may be constructed in the Southeast District and Theme Park East Overlay; however, an equivalent number of potential theme park sf would be removed from the allotment for the Theme Park District, such that the maximum theme park sf would not exceed 6,850,000 sf. The amount of restaurant sf in the Southeast District and the Theme Park East Overlay shall be further limited to up to 20 percent of the allotted theme park square footage in each District/Overlay.
[d] Up to 5,000 parking spaces may be constructed within the Theme Park District; however, an equivalent number of potential spaces would be removed from the allotment for the East Parking Area.
[e] Actual acres for hotel density to be determined by a licensed Civil Engineer / Land Surveyor. [f] For any square footage for back-of-house uses or limited retail, dining, and entertainment uses, the traffic generation characteristics of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the otherwise permitted hotel/motel (including accessory uses) density as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager prior to approval of building plans. Further, the proposed development shall not result in infrastructure impacts greater than those associated with the property's permitted hotel/motel density, unless such impacts are duly analyzed and mitigated pursuant to subsequent environmental review (such impacts shall be determined through a sewer and traffic impact analyiss to be submitted to the City Engineer). Additional infrastructure studies may be required as determined by the Planning Director. [g] Up to 5,700 parking spaces includes the number of existing spaces (1,324 spaces) plus additional spaces (4,376 spaces). [h] The planned extensions of Clementine Street and Gene Autry Way are proposed to be removed as part of the Project; therefore, the total acreage for the Theme Park East Overlay has been adjusted to include the acreages associated with these street rights-of-way; however, the maximum intensity of up to 3,348 hotel rooms would not change.

ES-26
TABLE ES-3

RECOMMENDED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
No. Location Recommended Improvement Improvement Trigger [a] Feasible Intersection Improvements [b]

11. Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way Add WBL, restripe WBT to shared WBT/R and eliminate north leg crosswalk Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, or at the Southeast District.

12. Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue Re-program the traffic signal to double-service the WBL turn lane to reduce WBL queuing Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

14. Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue Add NBL, SBL Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

16. Clementine Street & Katella Avenue Add SBL Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, or at the Southeast District.

22. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue
Lengthen SBL and WBL turn
pockets to accommodate queues
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

Improvements Subject to Caltrans Review or Approval [c]

10. Harbor Boulevard & Manchester Avenue Lengthen SBL turn pocket Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area or Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area.

21. Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps /Manchester Avenue Add NBL and reprogram signal
for lead-lag left-turn operation
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, or at the Southeast District.

25. Manchester Avenue / I-5 Southbound Ramps & Katella Avenue Restripe NB Approach to 1L, 2R
and remove split phase
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

Notes:
[a] Net trip generation estimates would be based on the trip rates Identified in Table 10 or the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual.

Peak hour public trips represent vehicle trips made from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. by resort guests. [b] Feasible improvements are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.[c] These improvements require Caltrans review or approval to be implemented, and therefore cannot be guaranteed by the City.

ES-27
TABLE ES-3 (CONT'D)

RECOMMENDED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
No. Location Improvement Trigger [a]
Operational Improvement Funding

7. Harbor Boulevard & Ball Road Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips to or from HCML.

12. Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

14. Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

18. Anaheim Boulevard & Ball Road Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips to or from HCML.

22. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

Intersections Subject to Access Analysis [d]

2. Flore Street / West Place & Ball Road Proposed development generating any net new peak hour vehicle trips to or from this access point. [e]

6. Ox Road / Cast Place & Ball Road Proposed development generating any net new public peak hour vehicle trips to or from this access point.

13. Harbor Boulevard & Convention Way / Toy Story Parking Proposed development generating at least 100 net new public peak hour vehicle trips to or from this access point.15. Clementine Street & Disney Way Proposed development generating at least 100 net new
public peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area or Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area.

16. Clementine Street & Katella Avenue Proposed development generating at least 100 net new public peak hour vehicle trips to or from this access point.

Notes:
[a] Net trip generation estimates would be based on the trip rates Identified in Table 10 or the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual.

Peak hour public trips represent vehicle trips made from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. by resort guests. [d] An access analysis would examine level of service (LOS) and queuing at the public vehicular access points for a given development and identify any necessary improvements for proper functioning of those access points, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. [e] At this location, the access analysis would include consideration of adding an additional access point to the Ball Cast Member Lot on Ball Road.

ES-28
TABLE ES-4

OTHER TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
No. Project Design Feature Timing

1. Install pedestrian signal on Walnut Street at Magic Way. To be installed upon closure of Magic Way to public through traffic.2. Install Class I Bike Path on the east side of Walnut Street from Ball Road to Katella Avenue. To be installed prior to final Building and Zoning Inspection for cumulative development of at least 10,000 square feet in the southwestern portion of the Theme Park District (south of Paradise Way and west of the Paradise Pier Hotel parking structure).3.

Install Class I Bike Path on the north side of Disney Way between Clementine Street Anaheim Boulevard, a Class I Bike Path on the west side of Clementine Street between Alro Way and Disney Way, and a bicycle parking facility in the East Parking Area and/or the adjacent Parking Overlay.

To be installed with construction of a parking structure or transportation facility, whichever is earlier, at the East Parking Area or the Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area.

4. Install pedestrian bridge(s) over Harbor Boulevard with public access to/from the sidewalk on Harbor Boulevard. [a] To be installed with the construction of a parking structure or transportation facility at the East Parking Area or the Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area in connection with the construction and prior to the operation of parking structures and/or a substantial increase in surface spaces or substantial change in operation of those spaces in the East Parking Area and/or the adjacent Parking Overlay.

5. Install traffic signal control at the intersection of Manchester Avenue / Clementine Street & Alro Way. [b] To be installed when signal warrants indicate it would be needed on the basis of an access analysis conducted for proposed development within the East Parking Area or Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area.

6. Provide in-lieu contribution and dedicate right-of-way adjacent to the Project Site on Ball Road and Haster Street for proposed Class II Bicycle Lanes on those streets.

Fee and dedication to be provided for each street prior to receipt of final Building and Zoning Inspection for cumulative development of at least 10,000 square feet on adjacent Disney property (northernmost portions of the Theme Park District for Ball Road, in the Southeast District for Haster Street).

7. Install traffic signal control at the existing driveway to the Southeast District on Haster Street south of Katella Avenue. [b] To be installed when signal warrants indicate it would be needed on the basis of an access analysis conducted for proposed development within the Southeast District or the Theme Park East Overlay.

8. Widen Katella Avenue to four westbound lanes along Disney's property adjacent to the Theme Park District from Disneyland Drive to approximately 800 feet west of Harbor Boulevard.

To be widened prior to receipt of final Building and Zoning Inspection for cumulative development of at least 10,000 square feet in the southwestern portion of the Theme Park District or development generating at least 50 net new public trips at the East Parking Area, the Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, the Southeast District, or the Theme Park East Overlay.

9. Widen Katella Avenue to four eastbound lanes along Disney's property adjacent to the Southeast District (from approximately 700 feet west of Clementine Street to approximately 400 feet east of Clementine Street).

To be widened prior to receipt of final Building and Zoning Inspection for cumulative development of at least 10,000 square feet in the Southeast District.

Notes:
[a] The Project would include at least one and up to three bridges between Manchester Avenue and Disney Way.[b] This action would be subject to a traffic signal warrant analysis.

ES-29
Chapter 1
Introduction
This report presents the operational traffic analysis conducted for the DisneylandForward Project (“Project”) proposed by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. (“Applicant” or “Disney”) in the City of Anaheim (“City”). The Project would allow continued, long-term growth of The Disneyland® Resort by allowing the transfer of uses permitted under The Disneyland Resort Project to other areas of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (“DRSP”) and properties within The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (“ARSP”) area owned or leased by Disney or other subsidiaries of The Walt Disney Company (“Disney ARSP Properties,” and, collectively with Disney’s properties in the DRSP, “Disney Property” or “Disney Properties”). These areas are or will be considered to be part of The Disneyland Resort Project as modified by the Project.

The Project would not increase the amount of development square footage or hotel rooms currently allowed in the DRSP and analyzed in Environmental Impact Report No. 311, which the City certified in 1993, or the number of hotel rooms currently allowed in the ARSP and analyzed in Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340, which the City certified in 2012. However, the Project would permit an increase of 4,376 theme park-related parking spaces in the ARSP.

The Project would require, among other things, approval of modifications to the DRSP, ARSP, City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element (City, June 2018) (“General Plan Circulation Element”), and Master Plan of Arterial Highways (Orange County Transportation Authority [“OCTA”], 2017) (“MPAH”). The City is preparing Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (“Subsequent EIR”) No. 352 to analyze the Project’s potentially significant impacts. While Disney submitted CEQA Transportation Analysis for the DisneylandForward Project (Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc., August 2023) to analyze the transportation impacts as required by CEQA pursuant to City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for CEQA Analysis (City, June 2020), this report has been prepared to be analyze the effects of the Project on traffic operations in the vicinity of the Project pursuant to City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (“City Guidelines”).
1 PROJECT LOCATION
The Project is located entirely within an area known as The Anaheim Resort®, a 1,078-acre portion of the City especially designated by the City’s General Plan for Commercial Recreation land uses, and intended to provide for tourist and entertainment-related industries, such as theme parks, hotels, tourist-oriented retail, movie theaters, and other visitor-serving facilities. The Anaheim Resort is located 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles, seven miles northwest of Santa Ana, and just north of Garden Grove in central Orange County. The Anaheim Resort includes three specific plan areas: DRSP, ARSP, and Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1. A map of the Project vicinity is provided in Figure 1, Local Vicinity and Existing Specific Plan Designations.

Project Site
The Project Site includes the entirety of the DRSP area (i.e., The Disneyland Resort, including the existing Theme Park, Hotel, Parking, and Future Expansion Districts) and the following Disney ARSP Properties:
 1515 S. Manchester Avenue (currently used as the Manchester Cast Member7 Lot [“MCML”])
 1585 S. Manchester Avenue (currently an office building and also currently used as the MCML)
 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard (currently used as the MCML)  1900 S. Harbor Boulevard (currently used as the Toy Story Parking Lot [“Toy Story Lot”])  333 W. Ball Road (currently used as the Harbor Cast Member Lot [“HCML”])  1717 Disneyland Drive (currently the Paradise Pier Hotel) The properties located at 1515 S. Manchester Avenue, 1585 S. Manchester Avenue, and 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard are collectively referred to as MCML. All Disney ARSP Properties are owned and operated by Disney with the exception of the Paradise Pier Hotel, where the hotel is owned 7 Cast Member is a term used by Disney for an employee of The Disneyland Resort. 2 and operated by Disney and the underlying land is owned and ground leased by a third party to Disney. The Project Site also includes areas identified in the General Plan Circulation Element as planned extensions of Gene Autry Way between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street and Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, portions of which are outside the Anaheim Resort. A map of the Project Site is provided in Figure 2, DRSP and Disney ARSP Properties.

CURRENTLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT
Development at the Project Site is currently governed by the DRSP and the ARSP as summarized in Table 1, Currently Permitted Development Summary.

Permitted DRSP Development
The environmental impacts of The Disneyland Resort Project, including the DRSP, were analyzed under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) in Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) No. 311, which was certified by the City of Anaheim in 1993 along with the adoption of Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0067. In 1996, in conjunction with an amendment to The Disneyland Resort Project, the City Council approved an Addendum to EIR No. 311, including a Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 0067. The prior CEQA review for The Disneyland Resort Project is referred to as the “DR EIR” in this report. The Disneyland Resort Project currently allows the following development:
 Theme Park District: Up to 6,850,000 square feet (“sf”) of theme park uses, up to 1,025 hotel rooms, and up to 475,000 sf of administration buildings with up to 2,300 associated parking spaces
 Hotel District: Up to 5,600 hotel rooms (including the 1,025 hotel rooms allowed in the Theme Park District), up to 300,000 sf of retail/restaurant uses, up to 9,930 parking spaces, and up to 200,000 sf of meeting rooms/convention space  Theme Park District/Hotel District: Up to 350,000 sf of the theme park square footage allowed in the Theme Park District may be developed as a retail entertainment center in the Hotel District
3  Parking District, East Parking Area: Up to 17,600 parking spaces, including up to 5,000 parking spaces that may be located in the Theme Park District  Parking District, West Parking Area: Up to 16,700 parking spaces  Future Expansion District: Up to 5,100 parking spaces As of the date of the Notice of Preparation of Subsequent EIR No. 352 for the Project, October 21, 2021, Disney has developed approximately 45% of entitled square footage of theme park space within the Disneyland and Disney California Adventure theme parks, 2,342 hotel rooms, and approximately 28,436 guest and cast parking spaces, along with various other components of the allowed development. As shown in Table 1, Disney has remaining entitlements within the DRSP area to develop approximately 3,657,115 sf of theme park, 3,258 hotel rooms, and 23,194 guest and cast parking spaces, along with various other components of development. Figure 3, Current DRSP Districts, shows the existing DRSP Districts.

Permitted ARSP Development
The City analyzed the environmental impacts of the ARSP Project in Master Environmental Impact Report No. 313 (“Master EIR”), which the City certified in 1994, along with the adoption of Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C. In December 2012, the City certified Supplemental EIR No. 340 in support of the approval of the Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Project (“ARSP SEIR”).

As detailed in Table 1, the ARSP as amended allows development on Disney ARSP Properties of up to 75 or 50 hotel rooms per gross acre with approval of a Final Site Plan as indicated below:
 Up to 1,116 hotel rooms on 1515 S. Manchester Avenue, 1585 S. Manchester Avenue, and 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard (MCML)
 Up to 3,348 hotel rooms at 1900 S. Harbor Boulevard (Toy Story Lot)  Up to 534 hotel rooms at 333 W. Ball Road (HCML)
 Up to 564 hotel rooms at 1717 S. Disneyland Drive (Paradise Pier Hotel) Section 18.116.070 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code also allows the development of theme parks, entertainment venues, and transportation facilities on these properties with approval of a conditional use permit.
4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project would not increase the amount of previously approved theme park square footage or hotel rooms. However, the Project would permit an increase of 4,376 theme park-related parking spaces in the ARSP. It would also allow transfer of theme park, hotel, and other retail, dining, and entertainment uses, and parking permitted in The Disneyland Resort Project to Disney Properties and provide for administrative review of Disney’s projects. The Project would require, among other things, the approval of amendments to the DRSP, ARSP, General Plan Circulation Element, and MPAH. Figure 4, Proposed Development Districts and Overlays, shows a map of the proposed DRSP districts and ARSP zoning overlays within the Project Site. Table 2, Proposed Permitted Development Summary, summarizes the proposed development limits with the Project.

DRSP Amendments
The Project proposes to reallocate allowable land uses within the Theme Park District (389 acres), the Parking District (57.1 acres), and the Southeast District (24.7 acres). The former Hotel District would become part of the Theme Park District and the Future Expansion District would become the Southeast District.

The Project would allow Disney to move a portion of the unused approved theme park square footage to the existing Hotel District, which would become part of the new expanded Theme Park District of the DRSP. The Project also would allow Disney to move a portion of the unused approved theme park square footage to the existing Future Expansion District, which would become the Southeast District of the DRSP, and to the proposed Theme Park East and West Overlays of the ARSP.

Under the Project, Disney could develop cumulatively up to 6,850,000 previously approved sf of theme park uses in the DRSP, including up to 6,850,000 previously approved sf in the expanded Theme Park District if all theme park square footage were developed in the expanded Theme Park District. Disney could also develop a portion of this previously approved theme park square footage in the newly renamed Southeast District (up to 390,000 sf), in the proposed Theme Park East Overlay (up to 840,000 sf), and in the proposed Theme Park West Overlay (up to 80,000 sf).

If theme park square footage is developed in the Southeast District and Theme Park East and 5 West Overlays, an equivalent amount of theme park square footage would be removed from the allotment for the Theme Park District, such that the maximum theme park square footage would not exceed 6,850,000 sf.

Similarly, the Project would allow Disney to move the unused portion of the hotel room approvals from the existing Hotel District to the existing Theme Park District or the existing Future Expansion District, the newly renamed Southeast District. Under the Project, Disney could develop cumulatively up to 5,600 previously approved hotel rooms in the DRSP, including a combination of up to 5,600 previously approved hotel rooms in the expanded Theme Park District if all hotel rooms were developed in the expanded Theme Park District and up to 1,852 previously approved hotel rooms in the newly renamed Southeast District.

The DRSP also would be amended consistent with the General Plan amendments described below, including changes to the circulation system.

ARSP Amendments
The Project would create a Theme Park East Overlay within the ARSP for the existing Toy Story Parking Lot and a Theme Park West Overlay within the ARSP for the existing Paradise Pier Hotel.

The Theme Park Overlay would allow Disney to develop theme park uses on these properties concurrently with the development of theme park uses on the expanded Theme Park District or the Southeast District of the DRSP. With the Project, Disney could develop up to 840,000 sf of previously approved theme park uses within the Theme Park East Overlay and up to 80,000 sf of previously approved theme park uses within the Theme Park West Overlay for a cumulative total of up to 920,000 sf of previously approved theme park uses in these Overlays. The Anaheim Municipal Code currently allows theme park uses in these Overlay areas with approval of a conditional use permit.

The Project would create a Parking Overlay within the ARSP for the Disney ARSP Properties located at 1515 S. Manchester Avenue, 1585 S. Manchester Avenue, 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard, and 333 W. Ball Road. The Project would increase the number of permitted theme park parking spaces in the Parking Overlay at 333 W. Ball Road, permitting up to 5,700 parking spaces (this includes 1,324 existing spaces plus 4,376 additional spaces). The Parking Overlay would permit 6 development of the same type of parking and transportation facilities allowed under Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.114.080 for the East Parking Area of the DRSP Parking District, and the same type of back-of-house uses, limited retail, and dining and entertainment uses allowed under Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.114.060 for the Theme Park District of the DRSP.

Disney could also develop hotel rooms in these Overlays as permitted by the existing ARSP and summarized in Table 2.

The ARSP also would be amended consistent with the General Plan amendments described below, including changes to the circulation system.

Vehicular Circulation
Convenient automobile access to The Disneyland Resort is an essential component of the success of The Disneyland Resort Project. Most visitors come to the Project area by automobile or bus, and it is especially important that the visitors’ experience be pleasant upon both arrival and departure. To assure this, the DRSP requires numerous improvements to the circulation system designed to enhance the visitor experience and ensure a safe and efficient transportation system for residents and employees in the area.

Improvements for area roads implemented and to be implemented in connection with The Disneyland Resort Project include enhanced connections with Interstate 5, improvements to the arterial and secondary road system, and construction of parking facilities to accommodate visitors to The Disneyland Resort and the Anaheim Convention Center. Many of these improvements have been constructed since approval of The Disneyland Resort Project in 1993. The Project would continue to implement physical improvements to the local transportation system envisioned by mitigation measures in the prior EIRs to enhance connectivity, access, and safety.

The proposed vehicular circulation system is depicted in Figure 5, Roadway Modifications and Vehicular Circulation Plan. General vehicular access would continue to be provided from I-5 and the following signalized intersections under the jurisdiction of the City of Anaheim: Ball Road & Disneyland Drive, Katella Avenue & Disneyland Drive, Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way, Convention Way & Harbor Boulevard, Clementine Street & Katella Avenue, Clementine Street & 7 Disney Way, Manchester Avenue & Harbor Boulevard, and Ball Road & Harbor Boulevard. The Project requests the following modifications to the City’s Circulation Transportation System as shown in Figure 5:

Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways Amendment.  Removal of the planned future extensions of Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue and Gene Autry Way between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street, which are planned through the Southeast District of the DRSP and the adjacent /Theme Park East Overlay in the ARSP
 Reclassification of Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard from a six-lane Major Arterial to a four-lane Primary Arterial General Plan Amendment.
 Approval of an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element and the City’s Bicycle Master Plan to remove the Class I Bike Path in the Southern California Edison right-ofway (“ROW”) between Harbor Boulevard and Anaheim Boulevard and add a Class I Bike Path on the north side of Disney Way between Clementine Street and Anaheim Boulevard Approval of an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element and the City’s Bicycle Master Plan to add a Class I Bike Path on the west side of Clementine Street between Alro Way and Disney Way (limits subject to change based on determination of proposed dedication)
 Removal of the planned future extensions of Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, and Gene Autry Way between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street, which are planned through the Southeast District of the DRSP and the adjacent Theme Park East Overlay in the ARSP
 Approval of an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element and the City’s Planned Roadway Network map (Figure C-1 of the General Plan Circulation Element) to reflect the following intersection lane configurations:
o At Harbor Boulevard & Convention Way, provide two left-turn lanes, one shared through/right-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane on the eastbound approach and one left-turn lane, one shared through/right-turn lane, and one exclusive right-turn lane on the westbound approach (consistent with existing configuration)8
o At Haster Street & Gene Autry Way, provide a single shared left-turn/through/rightturn lane for the eastbound approach and three left-turn lanes and two right-turn lanes for the westbound approach. The northbound approach would be equipped with a right-turn signal overlapping with the westbound left-turn signal phase 8 The final intersection configuration is subject to change and will be finalized when a site-specific access analysis is conducted for the Theme Park East Overlay.
8  Reclassification of Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard from a six-lane Major Arterial to a four-lane Primary Arterial (with no reduction to the width of the ultimate public ROW)
 Approval of an amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element and the City’s Bicycle Master Plan to modify the classification of the planned bike facility on Walnut Street between Katella Avenue and Ball Road from Class II Bike Lanes to a Class I Bike Path on the east side of Walnut Street
Street Abandonment.
 Abandonment of public ROW on Magic Way between Walnut Street and Disneyland Drive (pedestrian and emergency access would be provided)
 Abandonment of public ROW on Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and the southern property line of the proposed Southeast District of the DRSP  Abandonment of public ROW on Hotel Way north of Disney Way Other Improvements.
 Installation of a pedestrian signal on Walnut Street at Magic Way  Installation of a Class I Bike Path with a single two-way, off-street, shared-use pathway for pedestrians and bicycles with a minimum width of 10 feet9 on the east side of Walnut Street from Ball Road to Katella Avenue
 Installation of (1) a Class I Bike Path with a minimum width of 10 feet on the north side of Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard10 and Clementine Street; (2) a single two-way, off-street, shared-use pathway for pedestrians and bicycles with a minimum width of 10 feet on the west side of Clementine Street between Alro Way and Disney Way; and (3) a bike parking facility in the East Parking Area and/or the Parking Overlay just north of the East Parking Area
 Provide in-lieu contribution and dedicate right-of-way adjacent to the Project Site on Ball Road and Haster Street for proposed Class II Bicycle Lanes on those streets  Installation of traffic signal control at the existing driveway to the Southeast District on Haster Street south of Katella Avenue11
 Installation of traffic signal control at the intersection of Manchester Avenue / Clementine Street & Alro Way12
9 Where utility relocations are not feasible, the pathway may include brief sections with a minimum width of 8 feet. 10 The portion between Anaheim Boulevard and the I-5 southbound off-ramp is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Disney would work with Caltrans to approve and implement this Bike Path. 11 This action would be subject to a traffic signal warrant analysis. 12 This action would be subject to a traffic signal warrant analysis. 9  Construction of at least one and up to three grade-separated pedestrian bridges over Harbor Boulevard north of Disney Way and south of Manchester Avenue with public access to/from the sidewalk on Harbor Boulevard
 Widen Katella Avenue to four westbound lanes along Disney’s property adjacent to the Theme Park District from Disneyland Drive to approximately 800 feet west of Harbor Boulevard
 Widen Katella Avenue to four eastbound lanes along Disney’s property adjacent to the Southeast District (from approximately 700 feet west of Clementine Street to approximately 400 feet east of Clementine Street)
Trip Reduction Measures
The Project would continue to implement a number of trip reduction measures, including those that directly support alternative means of transportation like transit, bicycle travel, and pedestrian movement. Consistent with the originally approved Disneyland Resort Project and ARSP Project, this Project would include pedestrian linkages between land uses and areas of the Project Site, including landscaped walkways, promenades, and plazas. To further enhance pedestrian circulation and connectivity between land uses, the Project would include opportunities for construction of at least one and up to three grade-separated pedestrian bridges over Harbor Boulevard north of Disney Way and south of Manchester Avenue.

The Project would continue to implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (“TDM”) program for all cast members, as detailed in Chapter 4.

Pedestrian Circulation
The development of new attractions and hotel rooms and construction of the peripheral public parking facilities and mass transit systems discussed in this section have increased pedestrian activity in both the Project area and the surrounding Anaheim Resort. This has enhanced the urban character of the Project area and requires that facilities be provided to meet the needs of pedestrians.
10 Figure 6, Proposed Pedestrian Circulation, illustrates the existing and proposed pedestrian circulation system within the Project Site and surrounding area. Pedestrian routes, pedestrian and vehicular access points, and approximate pedestrian bridge locations are identified in Figure 7, Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Points. The primary destinations of pedestrians within the surrounding area will be:
 The Theme Park District
 The Southeast District
 East and West Parking Areas within the Parking District  The Disneyland Resort hotels within the Theme Park District and Southeast District  The Theme Park Overlays and Parking Overlays of the ARSP  Hotels, restaurants, businesses, and parking in the surrounding Anaheim Resort  The Anaheim Convention Center
 Downtown Disney
 Theme Parks
Grade-separated pedestrian bridges serve as a key connector over public street ROW, connecting users from one side of the street to the other without impeding traffic flow. Gradeseparated pedestrian bridges currently exist over Disneyland Drive and Magic Way. Two additional pedestrian bridges may be constructed over Disneyland Drive between Magic Way and Katella Avenue. At least one and up to three grade-separated pedestrian bridges may be constructed over Harbor Boulevard north of Disney Way and south of Manchester Avenue as part of this Project in connection with the construction and prior to the operation of parking structures and/or a substantial increase in surface spaces or substantial change in operation of those spaces in the DRSP Parking District (East Parking Area) and/or the adjacent Parking Overlay. As an example, those Cast Members parking in existing surface spaces in the Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area currently take a shuttle to the theme parks and no pedestrian access to Harbor Boulevard is permitted until such time that a pedestrian bridge is constructed. Approximate pedestrian bridge locations are identified in Figure 7. 11 An existing pedestrian route running east-west between Harbor Boulevard and Disneyland Drive currently serves as the main connection to the entrances of Disneyland and Disney California Adventure, including ticket booths and entry gates. To the west of the theme park entrances, this walkway becomes the retail, dining and entertainment district known as Downtown Disney, continuing westward on a grade-separated pedestrian bridge constructed over the lowered Disneyland Drive, and currently ending near The Disneyland Resort hotels west of Disneyland Drive. Pedestrian-friendly furnishings, retail and dining uses, and landscaping exist all along this pedestrian route, which is, while generally open to the public, on private property and subject to Disney restrictions. Project implementation may include reconfiguration and/or replacement of the existing east-west pedestrian route, including the space currently devoted to central theme park ticketing and gate functions. With any such changes, a non-ticketed pedestrian route for east-west circulation shall be provided through the Theme Park District connecting major destinations (theme parks, Downtown Disney, hotels, and parking facilities) to Harbor Boulevard and Walnut Street and would meet public safety size requirements.

Project Land Use Analysis Scenario
While the Project allows the transfer of permitted uses among Disney Properties, this study analyzed a specific scenario that was identified as having the greatest change to traffic conditions compared with the current entitlements (i.e., development of the Project Site to the full permitted density at the currently permitted locations). That scenario includes developing the maximum 1,852 hotel rooms (along with the permitted 5,100 parking spaces) within the Southeast District and developing the remaining allowed 1,406 hotel rooms along the north side of the Theme Park District south of Ball Road (rather than developing additional hotels within the current Hotel District). Five hundred of those hotel rooms would be located west of Disneyland Drive, with access from Ball Road at Flore Street / West Place, and the remaining 906 hotel rooms would be located east of Disneyland Drive, with access from Ball Road at Ox Road / Cast Place. The scenario also includes development of 5,700 parking spaces at HCML, an increase of 4,376 spaces over what is currently provided. While development of theme park square footage and retail, dining, and entertainment uses would be permitted on Disney Properties outside of the existing Theme Park District, parking for those uses would not change from current entitlements (other than the proposed additional parking at HCML) and, therefore, any relocations of those uses would not affect traffic patterns. This scenario also assumes development of the hotel rooms 12 currently permitted within the Disney ARSP Properties. This analyzed scenario is illustrated in Figure 8, Analyzed Project Land Use Scenario.

PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The DR EIR and ARSP SEIR analyzed and identified the environmental impacts of buildout of the DRSP and ARSP, respectively. Both documents analyzed transportation impacts on the basis of level of service (“LOS”) at intersections and street segments. However, State of California Senate Bill 743 (Steinberg, 2013) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b), resulted in a change to CEQA that now requires transportation impacts to be analyzed on the basis of vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”) rather than LOS. Therefore, the environmental analysis methodology from the DR EIR and ARSP SEIR for transportation impacts is no longer applicable under CEQA.

Nonetheless, below is a summary of the transportation analysis of the DR EIR and the ARSP SEIR.

DR EIR
The DR EIR analyzed City intersections based on forecast conditions in the years 2000 and 2010.

With substantial infrastructure improvements, through the implementation of the project design features (“PDFs”) and mitigation measures (“MMs”), summarized below, City streets and intersections were projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better during the afternoon peak hour. The DR EIR also projected traffic volumes on various freeway segments under the guidelines of the then-current 1991 Orange County Congestion Management Program (OCTA, 1991). The DR EIR found that buildout of the DRSP would generate hundreds of peak hour trips on the freeway system, including the mainline freeway lanes and the high occupancy vehicle lanes. It identified afternoon peak hour deficiencies by Year 2000 on Interstate 5 (“I-5”) between State Route (“SR”) 91 and Harbor Boulevard, between Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue, and between Katella Avenue and SR 22, although the I-5 widening project, which has since been completed, was expected to fully mitigate these deficiencies. The DR EIR also projected substantial traffic impacts on Disney Way (formerly Freedman Way) between Manchester Avenue / Clementine Street and I-5 during the morning and late-night peak hours, although those hours 13 were not quantitatively analyzed in the DR EIR. The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to these significant and unavoidable impacts.

The DR EIR identified various PDFs and MMs to reduce the traffic impacts associated with buildout of the currently approved development, including major infrastructure improvements within the vicinity. Those infrastructure improvements have already been implemented and operational for many years. On-going operational MMs such as TDM measures and construction traffic management measures continue to be implemented. PDFs also have been implemented within those components of the DRSP constructed to date. The complete list of required PDFs and MMs from the DR EIR is provided in Appendix A.

ARSP SEIR
Master EIR No. 313 analyzed the environmental impacts of the ARSP Project and was certified by the City in 1994, along with the adoption of Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C (provided in Appendix A). The ARSP SEIR, certified by the City in 2012 to support an amendment to the ARSP, analyzed the impacts associated with full buildout of the ARSP area, including buildout of the DRSP, which is wholly located within the ARSP study area. The ARSP permits a maximum of 35,000 hotel rooms, expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center to 2.12 million sf, and a total of 320,000 sf of additional commercial and event space. Under the ARSP, in lieu of hotel rooms, commercial space can be developed at a rate of 600 sf per permitted hotel room.

The ARSP SEIR projected traffic conditions for “Interim Year” 2015 and “General Plan Buildout” Year 2030 based on the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model (“ATAM”), which included development of The Disneyland Resort based on the DR EIR. It analyzed intersections and arterial street segments in Anaheim and the cities of Orange and Garden Grove as well as the California Department of Transportation (“Caltrans”) mainline freeway and ramp facilities. It concluded that full buildout of the ARSP would not result in significant intersection impacts by Interim Year 2015 conditions, but significant impacts might remain at up to nine analyzed intersections under General Plan Buildout Year 2030 conditions if necessary mitigation measures were found to be infeasible or were otherwise unable to be implemented. These nine intersections included five intersections analyzed in this study:
14  Disneyland Drive & Ball Road
 Disneyland Drive / West Street & Katella Avenue
 Harbor Boulevard & Ball Road
 Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue
 Euclid Street & Katella Avenue
The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with certification of the ARSP SEIR.

The ARSP SEIR also identified various mitigation measures that may apply to the Project. The complete list of mitigation measures and Conditions of Approval for the ARSP SEIR is provided in Appendix A.

ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY AND SCOPE
As noted above, the DR EIR analyzed transportation impacts on the basis of LOS, but CEQA now requires that transportation analysis be based on VMT. Disney prepared a separate study of all CEQA transportation impacts. The City’s Public Works Department, however, still requires analysis using LOS and related methodologies outside of the CEQA process based on the City Guidelines. This report analyzes only non-CEQA effects of the Project based on the City Guidelines.

The City requires that an LOS-based analysis be conducted to determine a proposed development’s local effects on the transportation system. The Study Area in this report was developed in consultation with City staff and includes the area roughly bounded by Ball Road to the north, Anaheim Boulevard and I-5 to the east, Orangewood Avenue to the south, and Euclid Street to the west (“Study Area”). Detailed analysis was conducted at a subset of the locations originally analyzed in the DR EIR and ARSP SEIR. Additional locations analyzed in the DR EIR and ARSP SEIR beyond these bounds were not included in this analysis because the Project is not anticipated to add 50 or more peak hour trips at those locations. Specifically, this study analyzes 32 intersections and 38 street segments, shown in Figure 9, Study Area & Analyzed Intersections, and listed in Tables 3, List of Analyzed Intersections, and 4, List of List of Analyzed Street Segments, respectively. The intersections were analyzed for peak hour operating conditions during the morning peak period (between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM) and the afternoon 15 peak period (between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM) corresponding to peak commuter activity. The street segments were analyzed based on daily traffic volumes and, if found to operate at LOS D or worse, for peak hour conditions.

The intersection analysis was conducted using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (“ICU”) methodology in accordance with City Guidelines. The ICU methodology bases LOS on the percentage of an intersection’s total capacity used. The General Plan Circulation Element establishes that the LOS should be LOS D or better for major intersections in the City with Goal

2.1 stating: “Maintain efficient traffic operations on City streets and maintain a peak hour level of service not worse than D at street intersections.”
Intersection deficiencies were identified based on either meeting the City’s sliding scale for Project-level increase to volume-to-capacity (“V/C”) ratio or causing or worsening LOS E or F conditions based on the ICU analysis. Under the sliding scale criteria, the Project would result in a deficiency if it increased the intersection V/C ratio by 0.05 or more for an intersection operating at LOS C, by 0.03 or more for an intersection operating at LOS D, or by 0.01 or more for an intersection operating at LOS E or F.

Deficiencies at Caltrans intersections were identified if the intersection would operate at LOS E or F under the Highway Capacity Manual (“HCM”) methodology, which identifies average intersection delay in seconds per vehicle. Also, this report identifies any intersections where the Project would increase a turn pocket queue length, causing or lengthening an exceedance by at least 25 feet (approximately one car-length), also based on the HCM methodology.

Street segment analysis was conducted using daily segment traffic volumes. Those locations found to operate at LOS D or worse under Future with Project Conditions were further analyzed for peak hour operating conditions to determine whether the segments operate at acceptable conditions (LOS D or better).

ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
The traffic operations analysis was conducted under Existing Conditions, Future without Project Conditions, and Future with Project Conditions. The Existing Conditions provide a reference point 16 for current operating conditions and are based on traffic counts collected in April 2022. The traffic counts are provided in Appendix B.

The Future Conditions analysis is based on Year 2030 traffic forecasts from the ARSP SEIR.

Those forecasts include full buildout of both the DRSP and ARSP under the currently approved entitlements and, therefore, provide a baseline that incorporates all permitted development (including third-party development) upon which to layer the specific traffic effects resulting from the Project. The Future without Project Conditions assume buildout of the roadway network consistent with the General Plan Circulation Element. The Future with Project Conditions modify the roadway network in accordance with the specific components of the Project as described above.

Existing traffic operating conditions are described in Chapter 2 and future traffic operating conditions with and without Project traffic are provided in Chapter 4. Traffic deficiencies and proposed traffic improvements are described in Chapter 6. Intersection lane configurations under each analysis condition are illustrated in Appendix C.

ORGANIZATION OF REPORT
This report is divided into nine chapters, including this introduction. Chapter 2 describes the existing setting within the Study Area, including the road network, transit system, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and existing traffic operating conditions. Chapter 3 forecasts future traffic conditions, including Future without Project Conditions and Future with Project Conditions.

Chapter 4 provides the traffic operations analysis under Future without Project Conditions and Future with Project Conditions. Chapter 5 describes the Project’s effects on pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and activity. Chapter 6 describes traffic deficiencies and transportation improvements proposed with the Project. Chapter 7 discusses Project construction. The Appendices contain supporting documentation and additional details of the technical analyses. 17 5
Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale
5 Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (DRSP)
Designated for future extension
in General Plan Circulation Element
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (HCSP)

LOCAL VICINITY AND EXISTING SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATIONS FIGURE 1 18
Toy Story Parking Lot
1900 S. Harbor Bl
Manchester Cast Member Lot
1530 S. Harbor Bl
1515 S. Manchester Av
1585 S. Manchester Av
Harbor Cast Member Lot
333 W. Ball Rd
Paradise Pier Hotel
1717 S. Disneyland Dr
5 Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale

DRSP AND DISNEY ARSP PROPERTIES FIGURE
2 Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (DRSP)
Disney Owned or Leased Properties in ARSP
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (HCSP)
Other Specific Plan Areas
Designated for future extension
in General Plan Circulation Element
19 Hotel
District
Theme Park
District
Parking District
West Parking
Area
Parking District
East Parking Area
District A
Future
Expansion District
Disneyland
Theme Park
Theme Park District
California Adventure
Theme Park
5 Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale
Theme Park District
Hotel District
Future Expansion District
District A
Parking District
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (HCSP)
Current Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Districts
Other Specific Plan Areas

CURRENT DRSP DISTRICTS FIGURE
3 20
Parking District
West Parking
Area
Parking
Overlay
District A
Southeast
District
Theme Park
East Overlay
Parking Overlay
Theme Park
West Overlay
Parking District
East Parking Area
Disneyland
Theme Park
Theme Park District
California Adventure
Theme Park
5 Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS AND OVERLAYS FIGURE
4 Theme Park District
Southeast District
District A
Parking District
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (HCSP)
Proposed DRSP Districts
Theme Park Overlay
Parking Overlay
Proposed ARSP Overlays
Other Specific Plan Areas
21 Hotel Wy
Parking District
West Parking
Area
Parking
Overlay
District A
Southeast
District
Theme Park
East Overlay
Parking Overlay
Theme Park
West Overlay
Parking District
East Parking Area
Disneyland
Theme Park
Theme Park District
California Adventure
Theme Park
5 Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale

ROADWAY MODIFICATIONS AND VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN FIGURE 5 Removal of Planned Future Roadway Extensions as Part of Project (Existing right-of-way on Clementine Street north of Orangewood Avenue would remain as a local street)
DRSP and ARSP Right-of-Way Improvements (combination of completed and remaining to be completed with future development) Roadway Reclassification
Existing Theme Park Drop-Off Area
Proposed Theme Park Drop-Off Area (location is approximate) C Lane Configurations Modified Due to Removal of Gene Autry Way S Proposed Traffic Signal
I Feasible Improvements Proposed
NOTES:

1. More detailed information showing the remaining vehicular and other circulation improvements are described in SEIR 352 and are on file with the City.

2. Vehicular circulation fom Magic Way to Walnut Street is right-turn only. As part of the Project, Magic Way at Walnut Street will no longer provide vehicular access, except for emergency vehicles.

3. Disney Way to be reclassified from a 6-lane Primary Arterial to a 4-lane Major Arterial with no reduction in width of the ultimate public right-of-way.

Proposed Road Abandonment
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (DRSP)
Disney ARSP Properties
C C
S
S
I
I
I
I I
22 Parking District
West Parking
Area
Parking
Overlay
District A
Southeast
District
Theme Park
East Overlay
Parking Overlay
Theme Park
West Overlay
Parking District
East Parking Area
Ball Rd
Magic Wy
Disney Wy
Manchester Ave Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av
Orangewood Av
West Pl
Cast Pl
West St
Vermont Av
Disneyland
Theme Park
Theme Park District
California Adventure
Theme Park
Convention Wy
Not to Scale

PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION FIGURE
6 Public Pedestrian Route to be Removed
as part of Road Abandonment
Public Pedestrian Route
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (DRSP)
Disney ARSP Properties
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (HCSP)
Other Specific Plan Areas
NOTES:

1. Sidewalks are provided for all public streets unless shown on this exhbit.

Public sidewalks located outside of the boundaries of The Anaheim Resort are not shown on this exhibit.

2. Until parking structure is constructed in the East Parking Area, existing public sidewalk to remain on the north side of Disney Way, west of Clementine Street.

3. Existing public sidewalks to remain on Magic Way until road abandonment occurs.

4. Non-ticketed pedestrian routes for east-west circulation shall be provided through the Theme Park District connecting major destinations (theme parks, Downtown Disney, hotels, and parking facilities) to Harbor Boulevard, Walnut Street, and Disneyland Drive. 23 Parking District
West Parking
Area
Parking
Overlay
District A
Theme Park
East Overlay
Parking Overlay
Theme Park
West Overlay
Parking District
East Parking Area
Southeast
District
Disneyland
Theme Park
Theme Park District
California Adventure
Theme Park
5 Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale

GUEST PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS FIGURE
7 Pedestrian Access Point
Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Point
Vehicular Access Point
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (DRSP)
Disney ARSP Properties
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (HCSP)
Other Specific Plan Areas
NOTES:

1. Non-ticketed pedestrian routes for east-west circulation shall be provided through the Theme Park District connecting major destinations (theme parks, Downtown Disney, hotels, and parking facilities) to Harbor Boulevard, Walnut Street, and Disneyland Drive.

2. Potential locations of pedestrian bridges:
∙ Harbor Boulevard, between Manchester Avenue and Disney Way ∙ Disneyland Drive, between Magic Way and Katella Avenue ∙ Katella Avenue connecting the Anaheim Convention Center area to what is now Disney’s California Adventure theme park (EIR 311)

3. As of November 2021, there is bus/shuttle access, however, such access may be removed if a transit center is moved the DRSP Parking District East Parking Area or adjacent ARSP Parking Overlay.

4. The location of access points may be adjusted subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
24 Parking District
West Parking
Area
(16,700 parking
spaces)
District A
Theme Park District
Up to 3,657,115 sf of
additional theme park uses
permitted, less that developed
at the theme park overlays
(no changes to theme
park parking)
Theme Park East Overlay
Up to 840,000 sf of theme park
(no changes to theme park parking)
and up to 3,348 hotel rooms
Parking Overlay
5,700 parking spaces and
up to 534 hotel rooms
Parking Overlay
Accommodates East Parking
Area permitted parking and
up to 1,116 hotel rooms
Southeast District
Up to 390,000 sf of theme
park, 1,852 hotel rooms and
5,100 parking spaces
Theme Park West Overlay
Up to 80,000 sf of theme
park (no changes to theme
park parking) and up to 45
additional hotel rooms
Former Hotel
District
3,258 hotel
rooms removed
Theme Park
District
500 hotel
rooms added
with access
to Ball Road
at West Place
Theme Park District
906 hotel rooms added
with access to Ball Road
at Cast Place
Parking District
East Parking Area
(17,600 parking spaces)
Disneyland
Theme Park
California Adventure
Theme Park
5 Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale

ANALYZED PROJECT LAND USE SCENARIO FIGURE
8 Theme Park District
Southeast District
District A
Parking District
Proposed DRSP Districts
Theme Park Overlay
Parking Overlay
Disney ARSP Properties
25 26
TABLE 1

CURRENTLY PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
Land Use Allowed by
Specific Plan
Existing Development
[a]
Remaining
Entitlement [a]
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan
Hotel District (97 acres)
Hotel Rooms 5,600 rooms 2,342 rooms [b] 3,258 rooms
Hotel Retail/Restaurant 300,000 sf 159,549 sf 140,451 sf Hotel Meeting Space 200,000 sf 161,220 sf 38,780 sf
Parking Spaces 9,930 spaces 5,885 spaces 4,045 spaces
Theme Park District (292 acres)
Theme Park 6,850,000 sf 3,192,885 sf [c] 3,657,115 sf
Administration Building 475,000 sf 305,430 sf 169,570 sf Administration Parking Spaces 2,300 spaces 1,545 spaces 755 spaces Parking District (57.1 acres)
East Parking Area 17,600 spaces 2,179 spaces [d] 15,421 spaces West Parking Area 16,700 spaces 16,298 spaces 402 spaces Future Expansion District (24.7 acres)
Parking Area 5,100 spaces 2,529 spaces 2,571 spaces
Total
7,825,000 sf
5,600 hotel rooms
51,630 parking spaces
3,819,084 sf
2,342 hotel rooms
28,436 parking spaces
4,005,916 sf
3,258 hotel rooms
23,194 parking spaces
Disney ARSP Properties
1515 S. Manchester Avenue
1585 S. Manchester Avenue
1530 S. Harbor Boulevard
(Manchester Cast Member Lot)
(14.88 acres)
1,116 hotel rooms
(75 rooms per gross acre or
75 rooms per lot or parcel,
whichever is greater)
Cast Member parking
(1,261 spaces - temporary
parking lot initially approved
on May 8, 2019, and an
approximately 67,424-sf office
building)
1,116 hotel rooms
1900 S. Harbor Boulevard
(Toy Story Lot)
(44.66 acres)
3,348 hotel rooms
(75 rooms per gross acre or
75 rooms per lot or parcel,
whichever is greater) [e]
Toy Story Parking Lot
(4,603 spaces - temporary
parking lot approved through
June 26, 2024)
3,348 hotel rooms
333 W. Ball Road
(Harbor Cast Member Lot)
(10.69 acres)
534 hotel rooms
(50 rooms per gross acre or
75 rooms per lot or parcel,
whichever is greater)
Cast Member parking
(1,324 spaces) 534 hotel rooms
1717 S. Disneyland Drive
(Paradise Pier Hotel)
(5.15 acres)
564 hotel rooms
(50 rooms per gross acre or
75 rooms per lot or parcel,
whichever is greater) [f]
Paradise Pier Hotel
(489 rooms and
approximately 17,619 sf in
ancillary commercial uses)
45 hotel rooms
Notes:
sf = square feet.
[a] These numbers are as of the date of the Notice of Preparation, October 21, 2021; over the course of this environmental review process, these numbers may change due to ongoing development efforts based on current entitlements. [b] Existing hotel rooms include Vacation Ownership Resort (VOR) units at the Grand Californian Hotel and the Disneyland Hotel. [c] This amount includes the existing 246,702 sf of retail, dining, and entertainment in Downtown Disney as of the NOP. The DRSP allows up to 350,000 sf of retail, dining and entertainment sf in either the Theme Park or Hotel District. [d] This amount includes the exisitng 842 spaces in the Ball Cast Member Lot. The DRSP allows up to 5,000 parking spaces identified for the East Parking Area to be located in the Theme Park District. [e] Acreage for density excludes ultimate public right-of-way for Clementine Street and Gene Autry Way. [f] The Paradise Pier Hotel property is comprised of two parcels: a 4.48-acre parcel that includes 489 hotel rooms and a 0.67-acre property that is allowed 75 hotel rooms.
27 TABLE 2

PROPOSED PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
Land Use Maximum Allowable Development
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan
Theme Park District (389 acres)
Hotel Rooms Up to 5,600 rooms [a]
Hotel Retail/Restaurant Up to 300,000 sf
Hotel Meeting Space Up to 200,000 sf
Parking for Hotel Uses Up to 9,930 spaces
Theme Park District Retail Entertainment Up to 350,000 sf [b] Theme Park and Back-of-House Uses Up to 6,850,000 sf [b,c] Administration Building 475,000 sf
Administration Building Parking 2,300 spaces
Theme Park Parking 5,000 spaces [d]
Parking District (57.1 acres)
East Parking Area Up to 17,600 spaces [d]
West Parking Area Up to 16,700 spaces
Southeast District (24.7 acres)
Theme Park Up to 390,000 sf [c]
Hotel Rooms Up to 1,852 rooms [a]
Parking 5,100 spaces
Total Maximum Allowable Development
7,825,000 sf
5,600 hotel rooms
51,630 parking spaces
Disney ARSP Properties [e]
Parking Overlay (25.57 acres) [f]
1515 S. Manchester Avenue, 1585 S. Manchester
Avenue, and 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard
(Manchester Cast Member Lot)
A portion of the parking spaces allocated
to the East Parking Area of the DRSP and
up to 1,116 hotel rooms
333 W. Ball Road
(Harbor Cast Member Lot)
Up to 5,700 parking spaces and
up to 534 hotel rooms [g]
Theme Park East Overlay (44.66 acres) [h]
1900 S. Harbor Boulevard
(Toy Story Lot)
Up to 840,000 sf of theme park uses and
up to 3,348 hotel rooms [c]
Theme Park West Overlay (5.15 acres)
1717 S. Disneyland Drive
(Paradise Pier Hotel)
Up to 80,000 sf of theme park uses and
up to 564 hotel rooms [c]
Notes:
sf = square feet.
[a] Up to 1,852 hotel rooms may be constructed in the Southeast District; however, an equivalent number of potential hotel rooms would be removed from the allotment for the Theme Park District, such that the maximum number of hotel rooms would not exceed 5,600. [b] Up to 350,000 sf of the theme park and back-of-house sf may be developed as retail, dining and entertainment sf. [c] Theme park sf may be constructed in the Southeast District and Theme Park East Overlay; however, an equivalent number of potential theme park sf would be removed from the allotment for the Theme Park District, such that the maximum theme park sf would not exceed 6,850,000 sf. The amount of restaurant sf in the Southeast District and the Theme Park East Overlay shall be further limited to up to 20 percent of the allotted theme park square footage in each District/Overlay.
[d] Up to 5,000 parking spaces may be constructed within the Theme Park District; however, an equivalent number of potential spaces would be removed from the allotment for the East Parking Area.
[e] Actual acres for hotel density to be determined by a licensed Civil Engineer / Land Surveyor. [f] For any square footage for back-of-house uses or limited retail, dining, and entertainment uses, the traffic generation characteristics of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the otherwise permitted hotel/motel (including accessory uses) density as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager prior to approval of building plans. Further, the proposed development shall not result in infrastructure impacts greater than those associated with the property's permitted hotel/motel density, unless such impacts are duly analyzed and mitigated pursuant to subsequent environmental review (such impacts shall be determined through a sewer and traffic impact analyiss to be submitted to the City Engineer). Additional infrastructure studies may be required as determined by the Planning Director. [g] Up to 5,700 parking spaces includes the number of existing spaces (1,324 spaces) plus additional spaces (4,376 spaces). [h] The planned extensions of Clementine Street and Gene Autry Way are proposed to be removed as part of the Project; therefore, the total acreage for the Theme Park East Overlay has been adjusted to include the acreages associated with these street rights-of-way; however, the maximum intensity of up to 3,348 hotel rooms would not change.
28 TABLE 3

LIST OF ANALYZED INTERSECTIONS
No. North/South Street East/West Street

1. Walnut Street Ball Road

2. Flore Street / West Place Ball Road

3. [a] Disneyland Drive I-5 Southbound Off-ramp

4. Disneyland Drive Ball Road

5. Disneyland Drive / West Street Katella Avenue

6. Ox Road / Cast Place Ball Road

7. Harbor Boulevard Ball Road

8. [a,b] Harbor Boulevard I-5 Northbound Ramps

9. [a,b] Harbor Boulevard I-5 Southbound Ramps

10. Harbor Boulevard Manchester Avenue

11. Harbor Boulevard Disney Way

12. [b] Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue

13. Harbor Boulevard Convention Way / Toy Story Parking

14. Harbor Boulevard Orangewood Avenue

15. Clementine Street Disney Way

16. Clementine Street Katella Avenue

17. [a] I-5 Southbound Off-ramp Disney Way

18. Anaheim Boulevard Ball Road

19. Anaheim Boulevard Cerritos Avenue

20. [a] Anaheim Boulevard I-5 Northbound On-ramp / Anaheim Way

21. [a] Anaheim Boulevard Disney Way / I-5 Ramps / Manchester Avenue

22. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street Katella Avenue

23. Haster Street Gene Autry Way

24. Haster Street Orangewood Avenue

25. [a,b] Manchester Avenue / I-5 Southbound Ramps Katella Avenue

26. [a,b] Anaheim Way Katella Avenue

27. [a] I-5 HOV Ramps Gene Autry Way

28. Walnut Street Cerritos Avenue

29. Walnut Street Katella Avenue

30. Euclid Street Ball Road

31. [c] Euclid Street Katella Avenue

32. Harbor Boulevard Vermont Avenue
Notes:

All intersections under the jurisdiction of the City of Anaheim except as noted. [a] Under Caltrans jurisdiction.
[b] Designated Orange County Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program intersection. [c] Shares jurisdiction with City of Garden Grove.
29 TABLE 4

LIST OF ANALYZED STREET SEGMENTS
No. Street Extents

1. Ball Road Euclid Street to Walnut Street

2. Ball Road Walnut Street to Disneyland Drive

3. Ball Road Disneyland Drive to Harbor Boulevard

4. Ball Road Harbor Boulevard to Anaheim Boulevard

5. Manchester Avenue Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

6. Disney Way Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

7. Disney Way Clementine Street to Anaheim Boulevard

8. Katella Avenue 9th Street to Walnut Street

9. Katella Avenue Walnut Street to Disneyland Drive

10. Katella Avenue Disneyland Drive to Hotel Way

11. Katella Avenue Hotel Way to Harbor Boulevard

12. Katella Avenue Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

13. Katella Avenue Clementine Street to Anaheim Boulevard

14. Katella Avenue Anaheim Boulevard to Manchester Avenue

15. Katella Avenue Manchester Avenue to Anaheim Way

16. Orangewood Avenue West Street to Harbor Boulevard

17. Orangewood Avenue Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

18. Orangewood Avenue Clementine Street to Haster Street

19. Orangewood Avenue Haster Street to Manchester Avenue

20. Walnut Street Ball Road to Cerritos Avenue

21. Walnut Street Cerritos Avenue to Katella Avenue

22. Disneyland Drive Manchester Avenue to Ball Road

23. Disneyland Drive Ball Road to Magic Way

24. Disneyland Drive Magic Way to Katella Avenue

25. West Street Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue

26. Harbor Boulevard Ball Road to I-5

27. Harbor Boulevard Manchester Avenue to Disney Way

28. Harbor Boulevard Disney Way to Katella Avenue

29. Harbor Boulevard Katella Avenue to Convention Way

30. Harbor Boulevard Convention Way to Orangewood Avenue

31. Harbor Boulevard Orangewood Avenue to Wilken Way

32. Clementine Street Manchester Avenue to Disney Way

33. Clementine Street Disney Way to Katella Avenue

34. Anaheim Boulevard Ball Road to Cerritos Avenue

35. Anaheim Boulevard Cerritos Avenue to I-5

36. Anaheim Boulevard I-5 to Katella Avenue

37. Haster Street Katella Avenue to Gene Autry Way

38. Haster Street Gene Autry Way to Orangewood Avenue
30 Chapter 2
Project Setting
This chapter presents the Project’s current environmental setting with regard to the street and transit system, including existing traffic operations. Additional information about pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure (including existing and proposed infrastructure) is provided in Chapter 5.

EXISTING STREET SYSTEM
The existing street system in the Study Area consists of a regional roadway system including freeways, arterials, and smart streets. These facilities provide regional, sub-regional, or local access and circulation within the Study Area. Typically, the speed limits range between 25 and 45 miles per hour (“mph”) on the streets and the speed limit is 65 mph on freeways.

Freeway System
The freeway system provides regional access to the Study Area. I-5 provides the bulk of regional access, but drivers also get to the Study Area using SR 57, SR 22, and SR 91. Together these freeways also provide extensive regional connectivity. Each are summarized below:
 I-5 travels northwest and southeast through the Study Area, with interchanges at Disneyland Drive, Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim Boulevard / Disney Way / Katella Avenue, and Gene Autry Way, including direct access to and/or from high-occupancy-vehicle (“HOV”) lanes at several interchanges. I-5 traverses the state of California, locally connecting south Orange County to Los Angeles, passing through Irvine and Santa Ana to the southeast and Buena Park, Norwalk, and Downey to the northwest. Because it travels northwest and southeast, it provides connections to nearly every freeway in Southern California and, thus, serves as a collector for the entire region.
 SR 57 travels north and south approximately 1.4 miles east of the Study Area, with interchanges at Orangewood Avenue, Katella Avenue, and Ball Road. It travels from the I5 / SR 57 / SR 22 freeway interchange approximately 1.7 miles southeast of the Study Area to the eastern San Gabriel Valley to the north, passing through or adjacent to the cities of 31 Orange, Fullerton, Placentia, Brea, Walnut, Diamond Bar, Pomona, and San Dimas. It provides connections to east-west freeways SR 91, SR 60, I-10, and I-210, which travel between the South Bay, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, and Pasadena to the west and Riverside, San Bernardino, and the rest of the Inland Empire to the east.  SR 22 travels east and west approximately 2.0 miles south of the Study Area, with an interchange at Euclid Street and Harbor Boulevard. It travels from Long Beach to the west to Tustin to the east, passing through the cities of Seal Beach, Westminster, Garden Grove, and Orange. It provides connections to I-405 near Long Beach and SR 55 in Tustin, as well as passing through the I-5/SR 57/SR 22 interchange.
 SR 91 travels east and west approximately 2.4 miles north of the Study Area, with interchanges at Euclid Street and Harbor Boulevard. It travels from Redondo Beach and Gardena to the west to Riverside and the Inland Empire to the east, passing through the cities of Compton, Paramount, Lakewood, Bellflower, Artesia, Cerritos, Buena Park, Fullerton, Placentia, Yorba Linda, and Corona. It provides connections to nearly every northsouth freeway in the greater Los Angeles area.

Street System
The major roadways providing regional and sub-regional access to the Project site vicinity are classified by the General Plan Circulation Element as arterials (major, primary, and secondary) and smart streets. Smart streets seek to improve traffic capacity and smooth traffic flow through signal synchronization, bus turnouts, removal of on-street parking, consolidation of driveways, and implementation of landscaped median islands to limit left turns onto or off of the street. The following is a brief description of the roadways in the Study Area, including their street classifications in the General Plan Circulation Element, as illustrated in Figure 10, Roadway Classifications.
 Anaheim Boulevard is a Primary Arterial and travels in the north-south direction. The roadway connects to Haster Street at Katella Avenue and is located east of the Project site. It provides three lanes in each direction, with either a center left-turn lane or divider and left-turn lanes at intersections.
 Ball Road is a Primary Arterial and travels in the east-west direction. It is located adjacent to several components of the Project site, including the northern boundary of the proposed Theme Park District and the southern boundary of HCML. It provides access to the Theme Park District at Flore Street / West Place, Disneyland Drive, and Ox Road / Cast Place and to HCML via a driveway between Harbor Boulevard and Lemon Street. Ball Road provides three lanes in each direction, with either a center left-turn lane or divider and leftturn lanes at intersections. 32  Cerritos Avenue is a Secondary Arterial west of Walnut Street and Primary Arterial east of Anaheim Boulevard and travels in the east-west direction. There is no connection between Walnut Street and Anaheim Boulevard. West of Walnut Street, it provides one lane in each direction with a center left-turn lane. East of Anaheim Boulevard, it provides two lanes in each direction with a center left-turn lane.  Clementine Street is a Secondary Arterial and travels in the north-south direction. The roadway connects to Manchester Avenue at Alro Way adjacent to the East Parking Area and currently terminates at Katella Avenue, where it provides access to the Southeast District. Under the General Plan Circulation Element, Clementine Street is planned to be extended south to Orangewood Avenue, which would pass through the Toy Story Lot. It provides one lane in each direction north of Disney Way and two lanes in each direction south of Disney Way, with a center divider and left-turn lanes at intersections.  Disney Way is a Major Arterial and travels in the east-west direction between Harbor Boulevard and Anaheim Boulevard and provides access to the East Parking Area. It provides three lanes in each direction, with a center divider and left-turn lanes at intersections.
 Disneyland Drive is a Secondary Arterial and travels in the north-south direction through the middle of the proposed Theme Park District, providing access to the West Parking Area, hotels, and other parking along the street. Disneyland Drive connects with Manchester Avenue at the I-5 ramps north of Ball Road and with West Street at Katella Avenue. It provides two lanes in each direction, with a center divider.  Euclid Street is a Primary Arterial and travels in the north-south direction. It is located west of the Project site and provides four to five travel lanes, two to three lanes in each direction, with either a center left-turn lane or divider and left-turn lanes at intersections.  Flore Street / West Place is a Local Street providing access to a residential neighborhood north of Ball Road (Flore Street) and providing access to the proposed Theme Park District south of Ball Road (West Place). Both streets provide one lane in each direction with leftturn lanes at Ball Road.  Gene Autry Way is a Primary Arterial and travels in the east-west direction. The roadway has a western terminus at Haster Street and provides three lanes in each direction, with a center divider and left-turn lanes intersections. It provides direct ramp access to the I-5 HOV lanes. Under the General Plan Circulation Element, Gene Autry Way is planned to be extended west to Harbor Boulevard at Convention Way, which would pass through the Toy Story Lot (Theme Park East Overlay).
 Harbor Boulevard is a Major Arterial and travels in the north-south direction. It is located on the eastern boundary of the Theme Park District and provides access for shuttles and buses at the East Esplanade and to a back-of-house / redirect road at Disney Way, which provides back-of-house circulation along the southern edge of the Theme Park District and connects to Disneyland Drive. Harbor Boulevard provides three lanes in each direction, with a center divider and left-turn lanes at intersections.  Haster Street is a Primary Arterial and travels in the north-south direction. The roadway connects to Anaheim Boulevard at Katella Avenue. It provides access to the Southeast District, for which it forms the eastern boundary. It provides three southbound lanes and 33 two to three northbound lanes north of Gene Autry Way and two lanes in each direction south of Gene Autry Way, with a center left-turn lane throughout and left-turn lanes at intersections. Under the General Plan Circulation Element, Haster Street is planned to have three northbound lanes north of Gene Autry Way.
 Katella Avenue is a Major Arterial west of Walnut Street and a Resort Smart Street between Walnut Street and I-5. It travels in the east-west direction and provides access to the proposed Theme Park District via two driveways between Walnut Street and Disneyland Drive and via Disneyland Drive itself. It also provides access to the Southeast District (currently the Katella Cast Member Lot), part of the DRSP, at Clementine Street.

It provides three to four lanes in each direction, with a center divider and left-turn lanes at intersections. Under the General Plan Circulation Element, Katella Avenue is planned to have four travel lanes in each direction between Disneyland Drive and I-5.  Magic Way is a local east-west roadway connecting Walnut Street to Disneyland Drive and providing local access to Disney parking (including the Pixar Pals structure to the north and the Lilo and Stitch surface lots to the south) and the Disneyland Hotel. It provides one to two lanes in each direction, with turn lanes for local access.  Manchester Avenue is a Secondary Arterial and travels in the east-west and northwestsoutheast directions along the west side of I-5. There are multiple disconnected sections of Manchester Avenue within the Study Area. The northernmost section connects Lincoln Avenue to Disneyland Drive and provides two lanes in each direction, with left-turn lanes at intersections. The middle section connects Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street, provides access to MCML and the East Parking Area, and provides one lane in each direction with a center left-turn lane. The southernmost section, which only provides southbound travel, begins at Anaheim Boulevard and travels southeast past Orangewood Avenue, providing two lanes and turn lanes as needed. Under the General Plan Circulation Element, Manchester Avenue is planned to have two northbound and two southbound lanes north of Alro Way.
 Orangewood Avenue is a Secondary Arterial west of Manchester Avenue and Primary Arterial east of Manchester Avenue and travels in the east-west direction. It is located south of the Project site and provides two lanes in each direction, with a center left-turn lane and left-turn lanes at intersections.
 Ox Road / Cast Place is a Local Street providing access to a hotel and parking lot north of Ball Road (Ox Road) and providing access to the current Disneyland back-of-house area, which is and would remain part of the Theme Park District south of Ball Road (Cast Place).
 Walnut Street is a Secondary Arterial and travels in the north-south direction along the western boundary of the West Parking Area of the Parking District and the proposed Theme Park District. The roadway has a southern terminus at Katella Avenue. South of Ball Road, it provides two lanes in each direction with a center divider. North of Ball Road, it provides one lane in each direction.
 West Street is a Secondary Arterial and travels in the north-south direction. The roadway connects with Disneyland Drive at Katella Avenue. It provides two lanes in each direction, with a center left-turn lane and left-turn lanes at intersections. 34 PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM
There are various ways to travel to the Study Area via public transit, as the theme parks and hotels are major tourist destinations. The various public transit options within and around the Study Area as of December 2022 are described below and shown in Figure 11, Public Transit.  OCTA Route 37 – OCTA Route 37 is a local line that travels between La Habra and Fountain Valley with an average headway of 30 minutes during the weekday morning and afternoon peak periods and 40 to 50 minutes on weekends. This line travels along Euclid Street west of the Project within the Study Area and stops at Ball Road, Cerritos Avenue, and Katella Avenue.
 OCTA Route 43 – OCTA Route 43 is a local line that travels between Fullerton and Costa Mesa with an average headway of 24 minutes during the weekday morning and afternoon peak periods and 20 to 30 minutes on weekends. This line travels along Harbor Boulevard within the Study Area and stops at Ball Road, The Disneyland Resort’s East Esplanade, and Katella Avenue.
 OCTA Route 46 – OCTA Route 46 is a local line that travels between Los Alamitos and Orange, with an average headway of 40 minutes during the weekday morning and afternoon peak periods and 50 to 60 minutes on Sundays. This line travels along Ball Road within the Study Area with nearby and adjacent stops at Walnut Street, West Place, Cast Place, and Harbor Boulevard north of the Project site.
 OCTA Route 47 – OCTA Route 47 is a local line that travels between Fullerton and Newport Beach with an average headway of 20 minutes during the weekday morning and afternoon peak periods and 30 minutes on weekends. This line travels along Anaheim Boulevard and Haster Street within the Study Area and stops at Ball Road and Katella Avenue.  OCTA Route 50 – OCTA Route 50 is a local line that travels between Long Beach and Orange with an average headway of 20 minutes during the weekday morning and afternoon peak periods and 40 minutes on weekends. This line travels along Katella Avenue within the Study Area and stops at Walnut Street, Disneyland Drive, Harbor Boulevard, Clementine Street, and Anaheim Boulevard.
 OCTA Route 83 – OCTA Route 83 is a local line that travels between Anaheim and Laguna Hills with an average headway of 30 minutes during the weekday and weekend. This line generally travels along Katella Avenue within the Study Area. Route 83 circulates around the perimeter of the proposed Theme Park District and provides multiple stops along Katella Avenue, Walnut Street, Ball Road, and Harbor Boulevard, including at The Disneyland Resort’s East Esplanade and on Katella Avenue at Clementine Street.  OCTA Bravo Route 543 – OCTA Bravo Route 543 is an express line that travels between Fullerton Transportation Center and Costa Mesa with an average headway of 12 minutes during the weekday morning and afternoon peak periods and 20 minutes on weekends. This line travels along Harbor Boulevard within the Study Area and stops at Ball Road, The Disneyland Resort’s East Esplanade, and at Katella Avenue. 35  Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“Metro”) Route 460 – Metro operates Route 460, a local line that travels between downtown Los Angeles and The Disneyland Resort. It has an average headway of 20 to 30 minutes during the weekday morning and afternoon peak periods and 30 minutes on weekends. This line travels along Harbor Boulevard, Manchester Avenue, and Disney Way within the Study Area and stops at Manchester Avenue and adjacent to The Disneyland Resort’s East Shuttle Area.  Riverside Transit Agency CommuterLink Route 200 – CommuterLink Route 200 is a commuter express bus connecting San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, and Anaheim. It operates approximately every 90 minutes on weekdays and 90 minutes to two hours on weekends. This line travels along Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard within the Study Area and stops at the intersection of Katella Avenue & Harbor Boulevard.

In addition to the inter-city bus lines summarized above, Anaheim Resort Transportation (“ART”) is a public transportation system that provides circulator shuttles with 15 different routes within and around The Anaheim Resort area and nearby vicinity, providing a convenient transportation alternative for short trips within the area. Each ART route stops at the East Shuttle Area serving the Disneyland and Disney California Adventure theme parks.

Additionally, the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (“ARTIC”) is located approximately 2.9 miles east of the Project site on Katella Avenue and is a major transit hub with local bus and commuter rail services. The Orange County Line of Metrolink and Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner include a stop at this station. Metrolink also operates six other rail lines that connect directly or indirectly to the Orange County Line and, therefore, can reach ARTIC. The ART Sports Complex Line connects The Disneyland Resort with ARTIC via Katella Avenue.

PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE
Extensive public and private infrastructure is available to accommodate pedestrian traffic within The Anaheim Resort area. Public infrastructure includes wide sidewalks consistent with General Plan Circulation Element requirements, crosswalks at intersections, pedestrian push-buttons and crosswalk count-down timers, and accessible curb ramps. Private pedestrian infrastructure on the Project Site includes many of the same features as well as pedestrian bridges over Magic Way adjacent to Disneyland Drive and over Disneyland Drive as part of the Downtown Disney entertainment district.
36 The only location within the Study Area missing adequate pedestrian infrastructure as identified in the ARSP is on the southwest side of Manchester Avenue adjacent to 1477 S. Manchester Avenue, which lacks sidewalks. Manchester Avenue has not yet been dedicated or widened to its full width adjacent to that property, which is not owned or controlled by Disney.

BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE
Figure 12, Existing and Planned Resort-Area Bicycle Infrastructure, shows a map of existing and planned bicycle facilities within the Study Area. These facilities are classified in the General Plan Circulation Element and the City’s Bicycle Master Plan as Class I Bike Paths, Class II Bike Lanes, and Class III Bike Routes. Existing facilities have been implemented, while planned facilities have been designated for implementation but have not been designed or engineered, and in some cases the ROW required to implement has not yet been obtained by the City. Each facility is summarized below by classification:

Class I Bike Paths
Class I Bike Paths provide for bicycle travel on ROW completely separated from the street. There are no existing Class I Bike Paths within the Study Area. The General Plan Circulation Element plans Class I Bike Paths at two locations, as shown in Figure 12:
 The Union Pacific rail ROW and Southern California Edison ROW west of Walnut Street  The Southern California Edison property north of Disney Way and extending east past Anaheim Boulevard
Class II Bike Lanes
Class II Bike Lanes provide striped and signed lanes within the paved street ROW. As shown in Figure 12, there are currently Class II Bike Lanes on:
 Euclid Avenue north of Ball Road
37  Cerritos Avenue west of Walnut Street13 and east of Anaheim Boulevard  Ball Road west of Loara Street and between Anaheim Boulevard and Claudina Street  Anaheim Boulevard north of Cerritos Avenue
 9th Street south of Katella Avenue
 Orangewood Avenue west of Janette Lane and east of Harbor Boulevard The General Plan Circulation Element plans Class II Bike Lanes on:
 Euclid Street south of Ball Road
 9th Street between Cerritos Avenue and Katella Avenue  Walnut Street (full length)
 Cerritos Avenue between Euclid Street and Carnelian Street  Ball Road between Loara Street and Flore Street / West Place, between Lemon Street and Anaheim Boulevard, and east of Claudina Street
 Vermont Avenue east of Citron Street
 Anaheim Boulevard between Cerritos Avenue and Katella Avenue  Haster Street between Katella Avenue and Simmons Avenue  Orangewood Avenue between West Street and Harbor Boulevard Class III Bike Routes
Class III Bike Routes are signed-only bike routes (i.e., no striping to denote a separation of bicycles from vehicular traffic). Existing Class III bike routes are provided on:
 Cerritos Avenue between Euclid Street and Carnelian Street  Ball Road between Loara Street and Walnut Street
 Walnut Street north of Ball Road
13 Except for a missing portion between Euclid Street and Carnelian Street. 38 Each of these Class III Bike Routes are planned to be upgraded to Class II Bike Lanes as summarized above. As shown in Figure 12, the General Plan Circulation Element plans additional Class III Bike Routes on:
 Citron Street north of Vermont Avenue
 Lemon Street

EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND OPERATING CONDITIONS
New traffic volumes were collected at the analyzed intersections and street segments in April 2022, representing Existing Conditions. The morning and afternoon peak hour turning movement counts at the intersections are illustrated in Figure 13, Existing Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Volumes.

Full traffic count data for intersections and segments is provided in Appendix B.

Intersection ICU Analysis
Table 5, Existing Intersection Operating Conditions – Intersection Capacity Utilization Methodology, shows intersection operations under Existing Conditions during the weekday morning and afternoon peak hours. It summarizes the V/C ratios and corresponding LOS at each of the analyzed intersections. As shown in Table 5, each of the 32 analyzed intersections currently operate at LOS D or better during each analyzed peak hour. Detailed ICU LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix D.

Caltrans Intersection HCM Analysis
Delay and LOS were calculated using the HCM methodology at nine intersections that include one or more Caltrans freeway ramps. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 6, Existing Caltrans Intersection Operating Conditions – Highway Capacity Manual Methodology, and the HCM LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix E. As summarized, each of the nine intersections currently operates at LOS D or better during both peak hours. 39 Street Segment Analysis
The City’s established daily capacities for street segments are summarized in Table 7, Street Segment Daily Capacity Assumptions, consistent with the ARSP SEIR traffic analysis. Table 8, Existing Street Segment Daily Operating Conditions, shows the existing 24-hour street segment volumes and operating conditions based on those capacities. As shown, all but one of the analyzed street segments currently operates at LOS C or better on a daily basis. Segment #23, Disneyland Drive from Ball Road to Magic Way, currently operates at LOS D on a daily basis.

40 41
42 43
44 45
46 TABLE 5

EXISTING INTERSECTION OPERATING CONDITIONS

INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION METHODOLOGY
Existing Conditions

ICU LOS

1. Walnut St & AM 0.575 A
Ball Rd PM 0.571 A

2. Flore St / West Pl & AM 0.582 A
Ball Rd PM 0.532 A

3. Disneyland Dr & AM 0.359 A
I-5 Southbound Off-ramp PM 0.262 A

4. Disneyland Dr & AM 0.670 B
Ball Rd PM 0.748 C

5. Disneyland Dr / West St & AM 0.413 A
Katella Ave PM 0.469 A

6. Ox Rd / Cast Pl & AM 0.393 A
Ball Rd PM 0.444 A

7. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.633 B
Ball Rd PM 0.648 B

8. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.563 A
[a] I-5 Northbound Ramps PM 0.653 B

9. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.415 A
[a] I-5 Southbound Ramps PM 0.426 A

10. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.332 A
Manchester Ave PM 0.374 A

11. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.262 A
Disney Way PM 0.338 A

12. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.446 A
[a] Katella Ave PM 0.520 A

13. Harbor Blvd & Convention AM 0.236 A
Way / Toy Story Parking PM 0.315 A

14. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.497 A
Orangewood Ave PM 0.567 A

15. Clementine St & AM 0.189 A
Disney Way PM 0.231 A

16. Clementine St & AM 0.319 A
Katella Ave PM 0.463 A
Notes:
[a] Designated Orange County Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program intersection.

No. Location Peak
Hour
47 TABLE 5 (CONT'D)

EXISTING INTERSECTION OPERATING CONDITIONS

INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION METHODOLOGY
Existing Conditions

ICU LOS

17. I-5 Southbound Off-ramp & AM 0.200 A
Disney Way PM 0.254 A

18. Anaheim Blvd & AM 0.427 A
Ball Rd PM 0.517 A

19. Anaheim Blvd & AM 0.325 A
Cerritos Ave PM 0.591 A

20. Anaheim Blvd & I-5 NB AM 0.396 A
On-ramp / Anaheim Way PM 0.512 A

21. Anaheim Blvd & Disney Way AM 0.407 A
I-5 Ramps / Manchester Ave PM 0.451 A

22. Anaheim Blvd / Haster St & AM 0.350 A
Katella Ave PM 0.501 A

23. Haster St & AM 0.284 A
Gene Autry Way PM 0.381 A

24. Haster St & AM 0.491 A
Orangewood Ave PM 0.664 B

25. Manchester Ave / I-5 SB AM 0.465 A
[a] Ramps & Katella Ave PM 0.464 A

26. Anaheim Way & AM 0.367 A
[a] Katella Ave PM 0.469 A

27. I-5 HOV Ramps & AM 0.156 A
Gene Autry Way PM 0.222 A

28. Walnut St & AM 0.692 B
Cerritos Ave PM 0.564 A

29. Walnut St & AM 0.401 A
Katella Ave PM 0.492 A

30. Euclid St & AM 0.558 A
Ball Road PM 0.623 B

31. Euclid St & AM 0.491 A
Katella Ave PM 0.530 A

32. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.599 A
Vermont Ave PM 0.526 A
Notes:
[a] Designated Orange County Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program intersection.

No. Location Peak
Hour
48 TABLE 6

EXISTING CALTRANS INTERSECTION OPERATING CONDITIONS

HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY
Existing Conditions
Delay LOS

3. Disneyland Dr & AM 6.2 A
I-5 Southbound Off-ramp PM 5.3 A

8. Harbor Blvd & AM 16.2 B
[a] I-5 Northbound Ramps PM 14.3 B

9. Harbor Blvd & AM 7.2 A
[a] I-5 Southbound Ramps PM 7.4 A

17. I-5 Southbound Off-ramp & AM 20.0 B
Disney Way PM 17.3 B

20. Anaheim Blvd & I-5 NB AM 19.6 B
On-ramp / Anaheim Way PM 25.6 C

21. Anaheim Blvd & Disney Way AM 39.9 D
I-5 Ramps / Manchester Ave PM 40.0 D

25. Manchester Ave / I-5 SB AM 21.2 C
[a] Ramps & Katella Ave PM 21.2 C

26. Anaheim Way & AM 21.6 C
[a] Katella Ave PM 23.3 C

27. I-5 HOV Ramps & AM 12.1 B
Gene Autry Way PM 14.4 B
Notes:

Results based on HCM 6th Edition Signalized methodology calculating average delay, in seconds, per vehicle.[a] Designated Orange County Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program intersection.

No. Location Peak Hour
49 TABLE 7

STREET SEGMENT DAILY CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS
Facility Type Daily Capacity
8-lane Divided (8D) 75,000
6-lane Divided (6D) 56,300
4-lane Divided (4D) 37,500
4-lane Undivided (4U) 25,000
2-lane Divided (2D) 18,750
2-lane Undivided (2U) 12,500
Notes:

Source: Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Traffic Study Report (PB, December 2010).
50 TABLE 8

EXISTING STREET SEGMENT DAILY OPERATING CONDITIONS
Existing Conditions
Daily
Trips V/C Ratio LOS

1. Ball Road
Euclid Street to Walnut Street

2. Ball Road
Walnut Street to Disneyland Drive

3. Ball Road
Disneyland Drive to Harbor Boulevard

4. Ball Road
Harbor Boulevard to Anaheim Boulevard

5. Manchester Avenue
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

6. Disney Way
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

7. Disney Way
Clementine Street to Anaheim Boulevard

8. Katella Avenue
9th Street to Walnut Street

9. Katella Avenue
Walnut Street to Disneyland Drive

10. Katella Avenue
Disneyland Drive to Hotel Way

11. Katella Avenue
Hotel Way to Harbor Boulevard

12. Katella Avenue
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

13. Katella Avenue
Clementine Street to Anaheim Boulevard

14. Katella Avenue
Anaheim Boulevard to Manchester Avenue

15. Katella Avenue
Manchester Avenue to Anaheim Way

16. Orangewood Avenue
West Street to Harbor Boulevard

17. Orangewood Avenue
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

18. Orangewood Avenue
Clementine Street to Haster Street

19. Orangewood Avenue
Haster Street to Manchester Avenue
Notes:

Arterial segment capacities from Table 7.

No. Location
MidBlock
Lanes
Total
Capacity
6D 56,300 25,231 0.45 A
6D 56,300 42,751 0.76 C
6D 56,300 29,026 0.52 A
2D 18,750 8,376 0.45 A
6D 56,300 35,475 0.63 B
6D 56,300 26,990 0.48 A
13,584 0.24 A
6D 56,300 10,138 0.18 A
6D 56,300
6D 56,300 33,693 0.60 A
6D 56,300 29,846 0.53 A
6D 56,300 37,019 0.66 B
6D 56,300 36,798 0.65 B
6D 56,300 37,028 0.66 B
8D 75,000 38,135 0.51 A
8D 75,000 35,147 0.47 A
4D 37,500 19,621 0.52 A
4U 25,000 15,086 0.60 A
4U 25,000 19,178 0.77 C
4D 37,500 19,658 0.52 A
51 TABLE 8 (CONT'D)

EXISTING STREET SEGMENT DAILY OPERATING CONDITIONS
Existing Conditions
Daily
Trips V/C Ratio LOS

20. Walnut Street
Ball Road to Cerritos Avenue

21. Walnut Street
Cerritos Avenue to Katella Avenue

22. Disneyland Drive
Manchester Avenue to Ball Road [a]

23. Disneyland Drive
Ball Road to Magic Way

24. Disneyland Drive
Magic Way to Katella Avenue

25. West Street
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue

26. Harbor Boulevard
Ball Road to I-5

27. Harbor Boulevard
Manchester Avenue to Disney Way

28. Harbor Boulevard
Disney Way to Katella Avenue

29. Harbor Boulevard
Katella Avenue to Convention Way

30. Harbor Boulevard
Convention Way to Orangewood Avenue

31. Harbor Boulevard
Orangewood Avenue to Wilken Way

32. Clementine Street
Manchester Avenue to Disney Way

33. Clementine Street
Disney Way to Katella Avenue

34. Anaheim Boulevard
Ball Road to Cerritos Avenue

35. Anaheim Boulevard
Cerritos Avenue to I-5

36. Anaheim Boulevard
I-5 to Katella Avenue

37. Haster Street
Katella Avenue to Gene Autry Way

38. Haster Street
Gene Autry Way to Orangewood Avenue
Notes:

Arterial segment capacities from Table 7.
[a] Existing traffic count for Segment #22 was collected north of Ball Road but south of the flyover ramp, and therefore only includes traffic from four at-grade lanes.

No. Location
MidBlock
Lanes
Total
Capacity
4D 37,500 10,363 0.28 A
4D 37,500 15,057 0.40 A
4D 37,500 33,701 0.90 D
4D
[a] 37,500 28,633 0.76 C

0.56 A
4U 25,000 15,989 0.64 B
4D 37,500 16,853 0.45 A
8D 75,000 42,173

0.51 A
6D 56,300 25,839 0.46 A
6D 56,300 34,512 0.61 B
6D 56,300 28,802

0.32 A
6D 56,300 26,134 0.46 A
6D 56,300 24,477 0.43 A
4U 25,000 7,990

0.54 A
6D 56,300 24,886 0.44 A
4U 25,000 6,518 0.26 A
6D 56,300 30,208

0.49 A
6D 56,300 20,828 0.37 A
6D 56,300 19,913 0.35 A
4D 37,500 18,281
52 Chapter 3
Future Year Traffic Forecasts
This chapter describes the development of future traffic conditions for use in the operational analysis for Project traffic. The traffic forecasting methodology was developed in consultation with City staff. Future without Project Conditions against which the Project is measured represent a future scenario in which the DRSP and ARSP are fully developed according to existing entitlements. Future with Project Conditions modify the Future without Project Conditions based on the shift of traffic due to land use changes (i.e., the relocation of hotel rooms and the addition of new permitted parking at HCML) and shifts in traffic due to infrastructure modifications (i.e., the removal of planned extensions of Clementine Street and Gene Autry Way and the closure of Magic Way to public through traffic).

FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The Future without Project Conditions include all permitted density and intensity of various land use types as well as completion of the roadway facilities as identified in the General Plan Circulation Element. That specific scenario was analyzed in the ARSP SEIR as the “General Plan Buildout Year 2030 With Project Conditions.” The ARSP SEIR traffic analysis was developed using the ATAM, the City’s travel demand forecasting model. ATAM was developed for the City and certified by OCTA to be consistent with OCTAM. OCTAM itself is based on, and consistent with, the SCAG regional transportation model, which covers the six-county SCAG region. ATAM uses regional traffic assumptions consistent with OCTAM (and thereby consistent with SCAG) and, therefore, incorporates adopted regional growth projections. Therefore, the traffic volumes from the “General Plan Buildout Year 2030 With Project Conditions” scenario from the ARSP SEIR were chosen to represent the Future without Project Conditions in this analysis.

The major changes to roadway facilities assumed completed under the Future without Project Conditions (compared to present-day infrastructure) are:
53  Extension of Clementine Street from Katella Avenue to the existing stub north of Orangewood Avenue
 Extension of Gene Autry Way from Haster Street to Harbor Boulevard  Widening of Katella Avenue to an eight-lane street from Disneyland Drive to I-5  Widening of Euclid Avenue to a six-lane street from Broadway to Katella Avenue Intersection lane configurations assumed under Future without Project Conditions are illustrated in Appendix C. These include some changes to actual or planned intersection lane configurations since the ARSP SEIR, documented in Appendix C. Figure 14, Future without Project Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Volumes, shows the peak hour turning movement volumes at the study intersections under Future without Project Conditions. Table 9, Future Street Segment Daily Traffic Volume Forecasts, shows the Future without Project Conditions daily volumes at the street segments.

PROJECT TRAFFIC – LAND USE DEVELOPMENT
As described in Chapter 1, the Project allows the transfer of uses permitted under the DRSP to other areas within the DRSP and to Disney ARSP Properties. Hotels may be constructed within the expanded Theme Park District and the proposed Southeast District. Theme park uses may also be constructed within the expanded Theme Park District, within the proposed Southeast District, and within the Theme Park West Overlay (Paradise Pier Hotel) and the Theme Park East Overlay (Toy Story Parking Lot). Additional parking would be permitted at HCML. Development of hotels in newly permitted locations would result in the removal of hotel trips from the currently permitted locations (i.e., accessing the existing Hotel District from Disneyland Drive) and the addition of hotel trips to newly permitted locations (i.e., off of Ball Road and in the Southeast District) as summarized in Figure 8.

Development of theme park uses in new locations would not alter traffic conditions compared with what was analyzed in the DR EIR because theme park parking would remain in the West Parking Area, East Parking Area14, and Southeast District. The only potential change in traffic associated 14 Though the parking spaces permitted in the East Parking Area may also be developed within the Parking Overlay, access to these spaces would not change and, therefore, there would be no change to traffic patterns. Similarly, up to 5,000 spaces permitted in the East Parking Area may be developed in the Theme Park District. 54 with Project modifications to parking is an increase in the number of permitted parking spaces at HCML.

Parking spaces do not intrinsically generate traffic, and the Project does not increase the permitted square footage for trip-generating uses such as theme park uses and hotels. Despite the fact the additional parking spaces permitted by the Project at HCML would not generate new trips to the Study Area, they were conservatively treated as trip-generating uses in this analysis.

The Project traffic shifts associated with the relocation of hotel rooms and the addition of parking spaces was estimated using a combination of trip generation estimates and distribution assumptions. Because the Project does not propose to reduce the amount of parking at any currently permitted location, no currently permitted parking traffic was relocated. However, new trips were added to the Study Area to reflect the new parking spaces proposed at HCML.

Trip Generation
The land uses within The Disneyland Resort are unique trip generators that do not conform to trip generation rates for typical land uses based on published data. Therefore, the trip generation rates used in this study were developed using alternative methods. They are based on, and consistent with, the estimates developed for the DR EIR for hotel rooms and theme park uses.

The DR EIR estimates were developed using empirical data from Disneyland and Walt Disney World Resort in Orlando, Florida. They are based on a design-day attendance forecast with application of mode split factors, vehicle occupancy factors, local versus tourist attendance factors, and time-of-day factors.

The DR EIR estimated total DRSP trips by land use, user group (i.e., cast member versus guest), and travel mode on an hourly basis. In order to normalize to rates applicable to the Project hotel rooms and parking spaces, the appropriate subsets of the total estimates from the DR EIR were divided by the total permitted hotel rooms and theme park parking spaces, respectively.

For parking spaces, the trip generation rates are based on the cumulative total of theme park guest and cast member trips, as those groups often share parking areas. The parking space rates were compared to empirical theme park parking rates developed using The Disneyland Resort 55 data from the Christmas holiday season in 2016 (which had higher attendance than a design day), and the two sets of rates were similar. Therefore, in consultation with City staff, the rates developed from the DR EIR were used for consistency. While parking spaces do not intrinsically generate traffic, parking-space-based trip generation rates were used as a proxy for theme park development in this analysis. Because the Project permits additional parking spaces at HCML that were not included in the DR EIR or ARSP SEIR, this analysis conservatively estimates additional trips associated with those spaces, even though the overall amount of permitted theme park space does not increase with the Project.

The resulting trip generation rates and estimates for the various components of Project traffic shifted or added under Future with Project Conditions are shown in Table 10, Trip Generation Estimates, and the details of the rate development are provided in Appendix F. As shown, hotel rooms were estimated to generate 5.032 daily trips, 0.222 trips during the morning peak hour, and 0.396 trips during the afternoon peak hour. Theme park parking spaces were estimated to generate 1.578 daily trips, 0.121 trips during the morning peak hour, and 0.079 trips during the afternoon peak hour.

The Project assumes that the remaining hotel rooms currently permitted within the Hotel District (3,258 rooms based on Table 1) would instead be located in the Southeast District (1,852 rooms) and in the DRSP areas south of Ball Road (500 rooms west of Disneyland Drive and 906 rooms east of Disneyland Drive), as shown in Figure 8. This scenario is used as it was identified as having the greatest change in traffic conditions compared with the current entitlements (i.e., development of the Project Site to the full permitted density at the currently permitted locations).

Therefore, as shown in Table 10, the analyzed Project scenario would shift 16,396 daily hotel trips (including 723 morning peak hour trips and 1,289 afternoon peak hour trips) away from Disneyland Drive and to access points on Ball Road and at the Southeast District. The Project would also result in the addition of 8,997 daily parking trips (including 690 morning peak hour trips and 450 afternoon peak hour trips) to HCML with access from Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road.

Trip Distribution
Regional trip distribution assumptions for the hotel rooms and theme park parking were developed based on existing regional traffic patterns. These patterns were identified based on traffic counts, 56 surveys conducted by Disney, and traffic records from StreetLight Data, a service that aggregates cell phone location data for the purpose of identifying travel patterns. The regional distribution patterns for hotel visitors and theme park guests and cast members are shown in Figure 15, Regional Trip Distribution.

Local distribution patterns are dependent on local access, for which various assumptions were made for this analysis. Hotel rooms permitted within the Theme Park District are assumed to take access from Ball Road at Flore Street / West Place and at Ox Road / Cast Place. Hotel rooms and parking in the Southeast District would be accessed via Katella Avenue and the proposed signalized driveway on Haster Street. Hotel rooms and parking at HCML would be accessed on Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road.

Figure 16, Net Land Use Development Peak Hour Intersection Volumes shows the cumulative peak hour traffic shifts, additions, and removals associated with the Project scenario at the analyzed intersections. Table 9 summarizes the cumulative daily traffic shifts, additions, and removals at the street segments.

PROJECT TRAFFIC – INFRASTRUCTURE MODIFICATIONS
The Project would also make modifications to existing or proposed public roadways as shown in Figure 5. Two changes, including the abandonment and closure of Magic Way between Walnut Street and Disneyland Drive and the modification of Disney Way from a six-lane arterial to a fourlane arterial between Harbor Boulevard and Anaheim Boulevard, would have no discernible effect on traffic patterns within the Study Area. On the other hand, the proposed removal of the planned future extensions of Gene Autry Way between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street and Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue would result in redistribution of traffic around the closures.

The removal of the planned future extensions of Gene Autry Way and Clementine Street were analyzed together, since they bisect the same major block bounded by Harbor Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Haster Street, and Orangewood Avenue (“Superblock” for the purposes of this discussion). Under Future without Project Conditions, there are four Gateway Intersections into the Superblock: Harbor Boulevard & Convention Way, Katella Avenue & Clementine Street, 57 Haster Street & Gene Autry Way, and Orangewood Avenue & Clementine Street. Two components of traffic would be redistributed due to Project closures: traffic driving through these extensions without stopping (“Pass-Through Traffic”) and traffic with an origin or destination within the Superblock (“O-D Traffic”). With the Project, two of the future Gateway Intersections (Haster Street & Gene Autry Way, Orangewood Avenue & Clementine Street) would no longer provide access to the Superblock and access to new development on the interior of the Superblock would be restricted to the two remaining Gateway Intersections and the existing Haster Street driveway to the Southeast District south of Katella Avenue.

Pass-Through Traffic
Pass-Through Traffic was estimated based on ARSP SEIR forecasts of traffic at the planned intersection of Clementine Street & Gene Autry Way, an intersection through which all PassThrough Traffic must travel. A portion of that traffic was estimated to be Pass-Through Traffic and, based on the directions of approach and departure as well as the turning movements at the Gateway Intersections, reasonable assumptions were developed for the pass-through routes this traffic would take. Since all pass-through routes would be eliminated with the abandonment of the planned extensions, all Pass-Through Traffic was reassigned to logical alternative routes, primarily using the four Superblock boundary streets. The general distributions of these rerouted trips were verified against ATAM forecasts showing the difference in trips with and without the closures.

O-D Traffic
Under Future without Project Conditions, the Superblock is assumed to be developed with up to 3,348 hotel rooms in addition to the residential, hotel, and commercial uses that already exist on the periphery. It would also be developed with the permitted DRSP use within the Southeast District (5,100 parking spaces) along the north side of the Superblock.

58 With the Project, all of these uses would remain permitted within the Superblock15, but access to future development on the interior would generally be limited to Harbor Boulevard at Convention Way, Katella Avenue at Clementine Street, and Haster Street at the driveway to the Southeast District. Some O-D Traffic is already assumed to use the former two access points under Future without Project Conditions, but the remainder had to be reassigned.

The amount of O-D Traffic to be reassigned was estimated to be the balance of the trips within the Superblock after removal of the Pass-Through Traffic described above. Similar to the PassThrough Traffic, the O-D Traffic was reassigned to logical alternative routes to access the same portions of the Superblock, informed by turning movements and verified against ATAM forecasts.

The cumulative total removed and rerouted Pass-Through Traffic and O-D Traffic at the study intersections is shown in Figure 17, Clementine Street & Gene Autry Way Shifts Peak Hour Intersection Volumes. Table 9 summarizes the cumulative daily rerouted traffic volumes at the street segments.

Summary of Traffic Redistributions
The traffic redistributions described above and summarized in Figure 17 and Table 9 result in increases in traffic primarily on streets surrounding the Superblock.  Daily traffic volumes added to Katella Avenue adjacent to the Superblock are relatively consistent east and west of Clementine Street between approximately 7,530 and 8,050.

West of Harbor Boulevard, there is virtually no effect on Katella Avenue (190 daily trips); east of Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street, there are large increases in traffic to I-5 (approximately 5,230 daily trips between Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street and the I-5 southbound ramps and 2,380 daily trips between the southbound and northbound ramps).  Daily traffic volumes added to Orangewood Avenue adjacent to the Superblock would differ east and west of Clementine Street. West of Clementine Street there would be an increase of approximately 3,600 daily trips, while east of Clementine Street there would 15 The Project’s Theme Park East Overlay also permits up to 840,000 sf of theme park uses in addition to the 3,348 hotel rooms. The Project would also permit up to 390,000 sf of theme park uses and 1,852 hotel rooms in addition to 5,100 parking spaces in the Southeast District. If developed, theme park uses (the trips that would travel to and from DRSP designated parking areas) could reduce the amount of other development within the Superblock and, thus, would reduce the amount of O-D Traffic. This analysis conservatively assumes that all permitted trip-generating uses would be developed within the Superblock.
59 be an increase of approximately 7,660 trips. There would be virtually no effect on Orangewood Avenue east of Haster Street (30 daily trips).  Daily traffic volumes added to Haster Street adjacent to the Superblock would be approximately 5,900 north of Gene Autry Way and 3,670 south of Gene Autry Way. There would be a minimal addition of daily trips on Anaheim Boulevard north of Katella Avenue (approximately 760 trips).
 Daily traffic volumes added to Harbor Boulevard adjacent to the Superblock would be approximately 7,090 north of Convention Way and 2,430 south of Convention Way. There would be virtually no effect on Harbor Boulevard south of Orangewood Avenue (240 daily trips), and north of Katella Avenue there would be an increase of approximately 3,540 daily trips.

The differences in volumes on the different segments of the four streets adjacent to the Superblock relate to the amount of traffic forecast in the ARSP SEIR to travel to / from and through the Superblock on the extensions of Clementine Street and Gene Autry Way. On Orangewood Avenue and Harbor Boulevard in particular, substantial amounts of traffic that were originally forecast to travel through the Superblock and the intersection of Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue (in either direction) would instead travel around the Superblock. These trips were already on the segments of Harbor Boulevard south of Convention Way or Orangewood Avenue west of Clementine Street, but only when rerouted would they also travel on the segments of Harbor Boulevard north of Convention Way or Orangewood Avenue east of Clementine Street. Therefore, there would be a substantial increase in traffic on Harbor Boulevard north of Convention Way compared to south of it and on Orangewood Avenue east of Clementine street compared to west of it.

Additionally, a similar amount of traffic is forecast to shift to Orangewood Avenue (a maximum of approximately 7,660 daily trips) than Katella Avenue (a maximum of approximately 8,050 trips), despite Orangewood Avenue being a lower-classification street with fewer lanes. This is due primarily to the fact that Orangewood Avenue, even after the increases in traffic, has more residual capacity and would operate at a better LOS than Katella Avenue based on the analysis in Chapter

4. 60

FUTURE WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The Future with Project Conditions peak hour traffic volumes, shown in Figure 18, Future with Project Conditions Peak Hour Intersection Volumes, incorporate the cumulative effects of the Project on Future without Project Conditions traffic volumes from Figure 14. These include the hotel and parking traffic shifts from Figure 16 and the traffic shifts resulting from removal of the planned extensions of Clementine Street and Gene Autry Way in Figure 17. The Future with Project Conditions daily traffic volumes at street segments are shown in Table 9.

61 62
63 64
5%
5%
10%
10%
30%
35%
10%
5%
10%
5%
35%
40% 5
Ball Rd
Vermont Av
Magic Wy
Disney
Wy
Convention Wy
Manchester Av
Cast Pl
West Pl
Harbor Bl
Clementine St
Disneyland Dr West St
Haster St
Anaheim Bl
Walnut St
Gene Autry Wy
Katella Av
Cerritos Av Cerritos Av
Paradise Wy
Orangewood Av
Chapman Av
Not to Scale
LEGEND
Hotel Trip Distribution

REGIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE
15 % Theme Park Trip Distribution
%
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
TABLE 9

FUTURE STREET SEGMENT DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS
Project Traffic
Land Use
Shifts
[a]
Gene Autry &
Clementine
Shifts
Total
Project
Traffic

1. Ball Road
Euclid Street to Walnut Street

2. Ball Road
Walnut Street to Disneyland Drive

3. Ball Road
Disneyland Drive to Harbor Boulevard

4. Ball Road
Harbor Boulevard to Anaheim Boulevard

5. Manchester Avenue
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

6. Disney Way
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

7. Disney Way
Clementine Street to Anaheim Boulevard

8. Katella Avenue
9th Street to Walnut Street

9. Katella Avenue
Walnut Street to Disneyland Drive

10. Katella Avenue
Disneyland Drive to Hotel Way

11. Katella Avenue
Hotel Way to Harbor Boulevard

12. Katella Avenue
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

13. Katella Avenue
Clementine Street to Anaheim Boulevard
Notes:
[a] Includes rerouting of trips and new development (parking at HCML) associated with DisneylandForward Project permitted development compared to what is currently permitted under the DR EIR and ARSP SEIR. 48,14328,96634,34861,334
7,601 66,861
(27) 56,903
(1,916) 65,194
Future with
Project
Conditions
00000
3,1601,560 2,306
67,110 (1,916)10,29026,660 746
746
63,060 (1,916)59,840 (1,330) 6,721 66,561 8,051
No. Location
Future
without
Project
Conditions
308
00 190
7,533
0 (1,030)
(1,726)
48,170 (27) (27)34,040 30859,260 6856,930 (27)42,390 2,724 2,724 45,114 746 11,036
17,040 746 3,906 20,94658,690 (1,030) 57,66047,460 1,650 1,650 49,110 75 TABLE 9 (CONT'D)

FUTURE STREET SEGMENT DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS
Project Traffic
Land Use
Shifts
[a]
Gene Autry &
Clementine
Shifts
Total
Project
Traffic

14. Katella Avenue
Anaheim Boulevard to Manchester Avenue

15. Katella Avenue
Manchester Avenue to Anaheim Way

16. Orangewood Avenue
West Street to Harbor Boulevard

17. Orangewood Avenue
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

18. Orangewood Avenue
Clementine Street to Haster Street

19. Orangewood Avenue
Haster Street to Manchester Avenue

20. Walnut Street
Ball Road to Cerritos Avenue

21. Walnut Street
Cerritos Avenue to Katella Avenue

22. Disneyland Drive
Manchester Avenue to Ball Road

23. Disneyland Drive
Ball Road to Magic Way

24. Disneyland Drive
Magic Way to Katella Avenue

25. West Street
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue

26. Harbor Boulevard
Ball Road to I-5
Notes:
[a] Includes rerouting of trips and new development (parking at HCML) associated with DisneylandForward Project permitted development compared to what is currently permitted under the DR EIR and ARSP SEIR. 000000
59,460 6,027 6,027 65,487 034,500 (3,128) (3,128) 31,37215,030 (253) (253) 14,77742,930 0 0 42,93032,800 (13,147) (13,147) 19,65317,740 0 0 17,74016,430 0 0 16,430 29,139
25,910 0 33 25,94322,670 0 0 22,67021,850 0 3,601 25,451 0 3,6017,659
33 21,480 0 7,659
61,891
53,740 (873) 1,510 55,25057,710 (1,050)
Future with
Project
Conditions
5,2312,383
4,181
No. Location
Future
without
Project
Conditions
76 TABLE 9 (CONT'D)

FUTURE STREET SEGMENT DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS
Project Traffic
Land Use
Shifts
[a]
Gene Autry &
Clementine
Shifts
Total
Project
Traffic

27. Harbor Boulevard
Manchester Avenue to Disney Way

28. Harbor Boulevard
Disney Way to Katella Avenue

29. Harbor Boulevard
Katella Avenue to Convention Way

30. Harbor Boulevard
Convention Way to Orangewood Avenue

31. Harbor Boulevard
Orangewood Avenue to Wilken Way

32. Clementine Street
Manchester Avenue to Disney Way

33. Clementine Street
Disney Way to Katella Avenue

34. Anaheim Boulevard
Ball Road to Cerritos Avenue

35. Anaheim Boulevard
Cerritos Avenue to I-5

36. Anaheim Boulevard
I-5 to Katella Avenue

37. Haster Street
Katella Avenue to Gene Autry Way

38. Haster Street
Gene Autry Way to Orangewood Avenue
Notes:
[a] Includes rerouting of trips and new development (parking at HCML) associated with DisneylandForward Project permitted development compared to what is currently permitted under the DR EIR and ARSP SEIR.

No. Location
Future
without
Project
Conditions
Future with
Project
Conditions
8,470 2,144 1,949 10,419 (195)
50,570 1,498 8,587 59,15747,600 1,498 3,930 51,53054,67025,290 2,796 8,701 33,99139,830 0 3,671 43,50155,320 1,279 1,279 56,59931,080 1,584 2,345 33,425 0 761
5,9053,671
46,190 1,279 1,279 47,46950,410 1,498 1,741 52,15124,080 746 746 24,826 0 243
0 7,0892,432
3,295 5,803 60,473
56,950 2,550 6,085 63,035
2,5083,535
77 TABLE 10

TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES - FUTURE WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Generation Rates [a]
Theme Park Rates (per parking space) 1.578 0.105 0.017 0.121 0.036 0.043 0.079Resort Hotel Rates (per hotel room) 5.032 0.147 0.075 0.222 0.192 0.204 0.396 Trip Generation Estimates
Existing Hotel District
Removal of 3,258 resort hotel rooms (16,396) (479) (244) (723) (624) (665) (1,289) Southeast District (KCML)
Addition of 1,852 resort hotel rooms 9,320 272 139 411 355 378 733 Theme Park District
Addition of 1,406 resort hotel rooms [b] 7,076 207 105 312 269 287 556 333 W. Ball Road (HCML)
Addition of 5,700 theme park parking spaces 8,997 596 94 690 205 245 450 Notes:
[a] Trip generation rates are based on trip generation estimates from The Disneyland Resort Traffic Study (Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., November 6, 1992).
[b] For analysis purposes, 500 of these hotel rooms are assumed to be developed south of Ball Road west of Disneyland Drive (accessing the Theme Park District via Intersection #2, Flore Street / West Place & Ball Road), and 906 hotel rooms are assumed to be developed south of Ball Road east of Disneyland Drive (accessing the Theme Park District via Intersection #6, Ox Road / Cast Place & Ball Road).

Description Daily
Morning Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Hour
78 Chapter 4
Future Traffic Operations
This chapter presents the analysis of Future without Project Conditions and Future with Project Conditions traffic operations based on the peak hour intersection and daily street segment traffic volumes described in Chapter 4. It includes ICU analysis for all study intersections, HCM analysis for Caltrans ramp intersections, queue lengths at key turn pockets, and street segment analysis.

ICU ANALYSIS
The ICU analysis for the 32 study intersections is provided in Table 11, Future Intersection Operating Conditions – Intersection Capacity Utilization Methodology. ICU worksheets are provided in Appendix D.

Future without Project Conditions
As shown in Table 11, under Future without Project Conditions, a total of 26 intersections are forecast to operate at LOS D or better during both the morning and afternoon peak hour. The following six intersections are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during one or both peak hours:
 Intersection #4, Disneyland Drive & Ball Road
 Intersection #5, Disneyland Drive / West Street & Katella Avenue  Intersection #7, Harbor Boulevard & Ball Road
 Intersection #12, Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue
 Intersection #22, Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue  Intersection #31, Euclid Street & Katella Avenue
79 Each of these intersections were also forecast to operate at LOS E or F in the ARSP SEIR.

Future with Project Conditions
As shown in Table 11, under Future with Project Conditions, 23 intersections are forecast to operate at LOS D or better during both the morning and afternoon peak hour. Compared with Future without Project Conditions, four additional locations are forecast to operate at LOS E or F during one or both peak hours. Intersection #4, Disneyland Drive & Ball Road, would improve from LOS E to LOS D during the afternoon peak hour and from LOS D to LOS C in the morning peak hour with the Project. Therefore, a total of nine intersections would operate at LOS E or F during one or both peak hours under Future with Project Conditions, prior to implementation of any of the improvements described in Chapter 7, including:
 Intersection #5, Disneyland Drive / West Street & Katella Avenue  Intersection #7, Harbor Boulevard & Ball Road
 Intersection #12, Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue
 Intersection #14, Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue  Intersection #16, Clementine Street & Katella Avenue
 Intersection #18, Anaheim Boulevard & Ball Road
 Intersection #22, Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue  Intersection #24, Haster Street & Orangewood Avenue
 Intersection #31, Euclid Street & Katella Avenue
CMP Intersections
Five of the analyzed intersections along Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue are designated CMP intersections. At these locations, it is acceptable to operate at LOS E under the CMP16, but if any CMP intersection is found to operate at LOS F, the City is required to address the deficiency 16 Goal 2.1 of the City’s General Plan Circulation Element maintains a standard o LOS D or better. 80 and restore the intersection to LOS E or better conditions. As shown in Table 11, each of these intersections are forecast to operate at LOS E or better during both peak hours and, therefore, comply with CMP requirements.

CALTRANS INTERSECTION HCM ANALYSIS
Delay and LOS was calculated using the HCM methodology at nine intersections that include one or more Caltrans freeway ramps. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 12, Future Caltrans Intersection Operating Conditions – Highway Capacity Manual Methodology, and the HCM LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix E. As shown in Table 12, Intersection #27, I-5 HOV Ramps & Gene Autry Way, would operate at LOS E during the afternoon peak hour under Future without Project Conditions; however, it would improve to LOS D with the Project.

Intersection #21, Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps / Manchester Avenue, would operate at LOS D during the afternoon peak hour under Future without Project Conditions; however, it would worsen to LOS E with the Project.

INTERSECTION QUEUES
Intersection queues were calculated within turn lanes using the HCM methodology to determine if potential physical or operational modifications could be warranted. The analysis reports both the 95th percentile queue length (that which may be exceeded not more than 5% of the time) and the 50th percentile queue length, which is the median queue during the peak hours. Table 13, Future Conditions Intersection Queues, summarizes the queue results for Future without Project Conditions and Future with Project Conditions. As shown, 13 intersections are projected to have one or more turn movements where the Project would add at least 25 feet of queueing (approximately one car-length), causing or lengthening a turn pocket exceedance during one or both peak hours based on the 95th percentile queue length. Nine of those locations would meet those criteria based on the 50th percentile queue length. The HCM queuing worksheets are provided in Appendix E.
81 STREET SEGMENTS
The 38 street segments were analyzed using the V/C methodology based on the City-defined arterial street capacities from Table 7. The daily street segment LOS results are provided in Table 14, Future Street Segment Daily Operating Conditions. As shown, under Future without Project Conditions, 20 segments operate at LOS C or better and the remaining 18 segments operate at LOS D or worse. Under Future with Project Conditions, 17 segments operate at LOS C or better and the remaining 21 segments operate at LOS D or worse. The Project would cause four locations to worsen from LOS C or better to LOS D or worse. The Project would also improve conditions at Segment #23, Disneyland Drive from Ball Road to Magic Way, from LOS D to LOS A. The following 21 segments would operate at LOS D or worse under Future with Project Conditions:
 Segment #3, Ball Road from Disneyland Drive to Harbor Boulevard  Segment #4, Ball Road from Harbor Boulevard to Anaheim Boulevard  Segment #8, Katella Avenue from 9th Street to Walnut Street  Segment #9, Katella Avenue from Walnut Street to Disneyland Drive  Segment #10, Katella Avenue from Disneyland Drive to Hotel Way  Segment #11, Katella Avenue from Hotel Way to Harbor Boulevard  Segment #12, Katella Avenue from Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street  Segment #13, Katella Avenue from Clementine Street to Anaheim Boulevard  Segment #14, Katella Avenue from Anaheim Boulevard to Manchester Avenue  Segment #16, Orangewood Avenue from West Street to Harbor Boulevard  Segment #19, Orangewood Avenue from Haster Street to Manchester Avenue  Segment #24, Disneyland Drive from Magic Way to Katella Avenue  Segment #26, Harbor Boulevard from Ball Road to I-5
 Segment #27, Harbor Boulevard from Manchester Avenue to Disney Way  Segment #28, Harbor Boulevard from Disney Way to Katella Avenue  Segment #29, Harbor Boulevard from Katella Avenue to Convention Way 82  Segment #30, Harbor Boulevard from Convention Way to Orangewood Avenue  Segment #31, Harbor Boulevard from Orangewood Avenue to Wilken Way  Segment #32, Clementine Street from Manchester Avenue to Magic Way  Segment #34, Anaheim Boulevard from Ball Road to Cerritos Avenue  Segment #35, Anaheim Boulevard from Cerritos Avenue to I-5 Peak Hour Segment Analysis
In accordance with City Guidelines, those segments found to operate at LOS D or worse on a daily basis under Future with Project Conditions were further analyzed for peak hour operating conditions to determine whether the segments operate acceptably (LOS D or better on a peak hour basis). This analysis was conducted on the 21 segments found to operate at LOS D or worse on a daily basis. The results are summarized in Table 15, Future Street Segment Peak Hour Operating Conditions. As shown, each of the segments were found to operate at LOS D or better during both peak hours.
83 TABLE 11

FUTURE INTERSECTION OPERATING CONDITIONS

INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION METHODOLOGY
Future without
Project Conditions
Future with
Project Conditions
ICU LOS ICU LOS Change

1. Walnut St & AM 0.730 C 0.735 C 0.005
Ball Rd PM 0.720 C 0.721 C 0.001

2. Flore St / West Pl & AM 0.640 B 0.680 B 0.040
Ball Rd PM 0.520 A 0.580 A 0.060

3. Disneyland Dr & AM 0.560 A 0.526 A -0.034
I-5 Southbound Off-ramp PM 0.490 A 0.449 A -0.041

4. Disneyland Dr & AM 0.870 D 0.795 C -0.075
Ball Rd PM 0.920 E 0.835 D -0.085

5. Disneyland Dr / West St & AM 0.840 D 0.834 D -0.006
Katella Ave PM 0.940 E 0.912 E -0.028

6. Ox Rd / Cast Pl & AM 0.770 C 0.808 D 0.038
Ball Rd PM 0.720 C 0.737 C 0.017

7. Harbor Blvd & AM 1.100 F 1.115 F 0.015
Ball Rd PM 0.960 E 0.988 E 0.028

8. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.740 C 0.761 C 0.021
[a] I-5 Northbound Ramps PM 0.790 C 0.814 D 0.024

9. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.610 B 0.685 B 0.075
[a] I-5 Southbound Ramps PM 0.510 A 0.597 A 0.087

10. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.410 A 0.498 A 0.088
Manchester Ave PM 0.470 A 0.542 A 0.072

11. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.490 A 0.566 A 0.076
Disney Way PM 0.680 B 0.797 C 0.117

12. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.800 C 0.857 D 0.057
[a] Katella Ave PM 0.950 E 0.951 E 0.001

13. Harbor Blvd & Convention AM 0.600 A 0.528 A -0.072
Way / Toy Story Parking PM 0.810 D 0.743 C -0.067

14. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.850 D 0.959 E 0.109
Orangewood Ave PM 0.900 D 0.915 E 0.015

15. Clementine St & AM 0.570 A 0.611 B 0.041
Disney Way PM 0.570 A 0.633 B 0.063

16. Clementine St & AM 0.650 B 0.706 C 0.056
Katella Ave PM 0.850 D 0.983 E 0.133
Notes:
[a] Designated Orange County Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program intersection.

No. Location Peak
Hour
84 TABLE 11 (CONT'D)

FUTURE INTERSECTION OPERATING CONDITIONS

INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION METHODOLOGY
Future without
Project Conditions
Future with
Project Conditions
ICU LOS ICU LOS Change

17. I-5 Southbound Off-ramp & AM 0.520 A 0.538 A 0.018
Disney Way PM 0.530 A 0.575 A 0.045

18. Anaheim Blvd & AM 0.820 D 0.839 D 0.019
Ball Rd PM 0.900 D 0.907 E 0.007

19. Anaheim Blvd & AM 0.720 C 0.716 C -0.004
Cerritos Ave PM 0.860 D 0.865 D 0.005

20. Anaheim Blvd & I-5 NB AM 0.550 A 0.599 A 0.049
On-ramp / Anaheim Way PM 0.850 D 0.876 D 0.026

21. Anaheim Blvd & Disney Way AM 0.710 C 0.741 C 0.031
I-5 Ramps / Manchester Ave PM 0.850 D 0.889 D 0.039

22. Anaheim Blvd / Haster St & AM 0.900 D 0.946 E 0.046 Katella Ave PM 0.920 E 0.984 E 0.064

23. Haster St & AM 0.800 C 0.625 B -0.175
Gene Autry Way PM 0.900 D 0.790 C -0.110

24. Haster St & AM 0.790 C 0.816 D 0.026
Orangewood Ave PM 0.830 D 0.934 E 0.104

25. Manchester Ave / I-5 SB AM 0.770 C 0.790 C 0.020
[a] Ramps & Katella Ave PM 0.790 C 0.849 D 0.059

26. Anaheim Way & AM 0.810 D 0.818 D 0.008
[a] Katella Ave PM 0.780 C 0.792 C 0.012

27. I-5 HOV Ramps & AM 0.550 A 0.489 A -0.061
Gene Autry Way PM 0.790 C 0.673 B -0.117

28. Walnut St & AM 0.850 D 0.853 D 0.003
Cerritos Ave PM 0.730 C 0.732 C 0.002

29. Walnut St & AM 0.890 D 0.891 D 0.001
Katella Ave PM 0.880 D 0.875 D -0.005

30. Euclid St & AM 0.750 C 0.751 C 0.001
Ball Road PM 0.800 C 0.803 D 0.003

31. Euclid St & AM 0.870 D 0.872 D 0.002
Katella Ave PM 0.940 E 0.937 E -0.003

32. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.750 C 0.758 C 0.008
Vermont Ave PM 0.780 C 0.788 C 0.008
Notes:
[a] Designated Orange County Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program intersection.

No. Location Peak
Hour
85 TABLE 12

FUTURE CALTRANS INTERSECTION OPERATING CONDITIONS

HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY
Future without Project
Conditions
Future with
Project Conditions
Delay LOS Delay LOS Change

3. Disneyland Dr & AM 9.2 A 8.9 A -0.3
I-5 Southbound Off-ramp PM 8.0 A 7.8 A -0.2

8. Harbor Blvd & AM 14.7 B 16.6 B 1.9
[a] I-5 Northbound Ramps PM 33.9 C 48.4 D 14.5

9. Harbor Blvd & AM 10.7 B 13.6 B 2.9
[a] I-5 Southbound Ramps PM 7.2 A 8.7 A 1.5

17. I-5 Southbound Off-ramp & AM 17.4 B 18.4 B 1.0
Disney Way PM 18.0 B 19.8 B 1.8

20. Anaheim Blvd & I-5 NB AM 17.4 B 20.2 C 2.8
On-ramp / Anaheim Way PM 42.6 D 46.7 D 4.1

21. Anaheim Blvd & Disney Way AM 43.5 D 45.3 D 1.8
I-5 Ramps / Manchester Ave PM 53.8 D 58.1 E 4.3

25. Manchester Ave / I-5 SB AM 42.3 D 44.7 D 2.4
[a] Ramps & Katella Ave PM 33.4 C 37.9 D 4.5

26. Anaheim Way & AM 31.4 C 31.6 C 0.2
[a] Katella Ave PM 33.1 C 34.5 C 1.4

27. I-5 HOV Ramps & AM 22.8 C 21.5 C -1.3
Gene Autry Way PM 75.2 E 46.8 D -28.4
Notes:

Results based on HCM 6th Edition Signalized methodology calculating average delay, in seconds, per vehicle.[a] Designated Orange County Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program intersection.

No. Location Peak Hour
86 TABLE 13

FUTURE CONDITIONS QUEUING
95th Percentile Queue Length Average 50th Percentile Queue Length Without
Project
Conditions
With
Project
Conditions
Change
Without
Project
Conditions
With
Project
Conditions
Change
Intersection #2. Flore Street / West Place & Ball Road
Westbound Left-Turn 210 A.M. 397 421 24 264 283 19
[a] P.M. 296 328 32 185 210 25
Intersection #6. Ox Road / Cast Place & Ball Road
Westbound Left-Turn 220 A.M. 322 388 66 205 257 52
[a] P.M. 130 239 109 72 141 69
Intersection #7. Harbor Boulevard & Ball Road
Eastbound Right-Turn 200 A.M. 2,778 2,957 179 1,757 1,868 111 [a] P.M. 1,399 1,928 529 448 1,258 810
Intersection #10. Harbor Boulevard & Manchester Avenue
Southbound Left-Turn 130 A.M. 316 400 84 200 266 66
[a] P.M. 147 184 37 82 102 20
Intersection #11. Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way
Southbound Left-Turn (dual) 260 A.M. 258 291 33 156 180 24 [a] P.M. 159 223 64 88 128 40
Westbound Left-Turn (dual) 480 A.M. 128 207 79 71 118 47 [b] P.M. 408 569 161 272 388 116
Notes:

All lengths shown in feet as reported in the HCM analysis provided in Appendix F. Bolded values indicate queues exceed the turn pocket storage length. Queues are reported per lane. At dual turn lanes, the reported queue length would be experienced in each lane.[a] Existing turn pocket length.[b] Average length of two turn pockets.

Intersection
Turn
Pocket
Length
Peak
Hour
87 TABLE 13 (CONT'D)

FUTURE CONDITIONS QUEUING
95th Percentile Queue Length Average 50th Percentile Queue Length Without
Project
Conditions
With
Project
Conditions
Change
Without
Project
Conditions
With
Project
Conditions
Change
Intersection #12. Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue
Northbound Right-Turn 300 A.M. 179 395 216 99 262 163
[a,c] P.M. 239 711 472 142 523 381
Westbound Left-Turn (dual) 300 A.M. 236 399 163 139 253 114 [a,c] P.M. 303 813 510 189 536 347
Intersection #14. Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue
Southbound Left-Turn 210 A.M. 92 273 181 51 167 116
[a,c] P.M. 154 298 144 85 186 101
Intersection #16. Clementine Street & Katella Avenue
Southbound Left-Turn 285 A.M. 169 169 0 94 94 0
[a,c] P.M. 485 651 166 327 429 102
Intersection #21. Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps / Manchester Avenue Northbound Left-Turn 200 A.M. 140 208 68 78 119 41
[a] P.M. 410 487 77 274 336 62
Intersection #22. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue Southbound Left-Turn (dual) 240 A.M. 317 336 19 201 215 14 [a,c] P.M. 287 324 37 178 200 22
Southbound Right-Turn 170 A.M. 390 465 75 258 318 60
[a,c] P.M. 340 506 166 219 352 133
Westbound Left-Turn (dual) 270 A.M. 353 375 22 229 240 11 [a,c] P.M. 358 406 48 233 263 30
Notes:

All lengths shown in feet as reported in the HCM analysis provided in Appendix F. Bolded values indicate queues exceed the turn pocket storage length. Queues are reported per lane. At dual turn lanes, the reported queue length would be experienced in each lane.[a] Existing turn pocket length.[c] Turn pocket could be lengthened when intersection is upgraded to its full General Plan Circulation Element standard configuration (subject to City Final plans at construction).

Intersection
Turn
Pocket
Length
Peak
Hour
88 TABLE 13 (CONT'D)

FUTURE CONDITIONS QUEUING
95th Percentile Queue Length Average 50th Percentile Queue Length Without
Project
Conditions
With
Project
Conditions
Change
Without
Project
Conditions
With
Project
Conditions
Change
Intersection #23. Haster Street & Gene Autry Way
Southbound Left-Turn (dual) 300 A.M. 66 228 162 37 133 96 [d] P.M. 183 350 167 102 226 124
Intersection #24. Haster Street & Orangewood Avenue
Northbound Left-Turn 300 A.M. 92 154 62 51 85 34
[d] P.M. 252 402 150 151 258 107
Southbound Left-Turn 300 A.M. 181 159 -22 101 89 -12
[d] P.M. 221 307 86 128 187 59
Intersection #25. Manchester Avenue / I-5 Southbound Ramps & Katella Avenue Eastbound Right-Turn 610 A.M. 561 652 91 398 473 75
[a] P.M. 514 630 116 359 455 96
Notes:

All lengths shown in feet as reported in the HCM analysis provided in Appendix F. Bolded values indicate queues exceed the turn pocket storage length. Queues are reported per lane. At dual turn lanes, the reported queue length would be experienced in each lane.[a] Existing turn pocket length.[d] Intersection is not yet built to its full configuration under the General Plan Circulation Element. Future turn pockets are assumed to be 300 feet in length per Engineering Standard Detail 164-C, except where physical space precludes that length.

Intersection
Turn
Pocket
Length
Peak
Hour
89 TABLE 14

FUTURE STREET SEGMENT DAILY OPERATING CONDITIONS
Future without
Project Conditions
Future with
Project Conditions
Daily
Trips V/C Ratio LOS Daily Trips V/C Ratio LOS Change

1. Ball Road
Euclid Street to Walnut Street

2. Ball Road
Walnut Street to Disneyland Drive

3. Ball Road
Disneyland Drive to Harbor Boulevard

4. Ball Road
Harbor Boulevard to Anaheim Boulevard

5. Manchester Avenue
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

6. Disney Way 6D 56,300
[b] Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street 4D 37,500

7. Disney Way 6D 56,300
[b] Clementine Street to Anaheim Boulevard 4D 37,500

8. Katella Avenue
9th Street to Walnut Street

9. Katella Avenue
Walnut Street to Disneyland Drive

10. Katella Avenue
Disneyland Drive to Hotel Way

11. Katella Avenue
Hotel Way to Harbor Boulevard

12. Katella Avenue
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

13. Katella Avenue
Clementine Street to Anaheim Boulevard
Notes:

Arterial segment capacities from Table 7.[a] Deficient locations (LOS D or worse under Future with Project Conditions based on daily traffic volumes) are further analyzed for peak hour operating conditions in Table 15.[b] Under Future with Project Conditions, the minimum road dimensions would be reduced to 4-lane divided.

Deficient
Location
[a]

YESYESYES
NO
YESYES
NONONO

YESYESYES
8D 75,000 59,840 0.80 C 66,561 0.89 D 0.098D 75,000 59,260 0.79 C 66,861 0.89 D 0.10

0.87 D -0.02
8D 75,000 63,060 0.84 D 61,334 0.828D 75,000 67,110 0.89 D 65,194 D -0.02
6D 56,300 56,930 1.01 F 56,903 1.01 F 0.006D 56,300 48,170 0.86 D 48,143 0.86 D 0.00

0.56 A 0.26
26,660 0.47 A 28,966 0.7717,040 0.30 A 20,946
C 0.30
A 0.03
6D 56,300 47,460 0.84 D 49,110 0.87 D 0.034U 25,000 10,290 0.41 A 11,036 0.446D 56,300 58,690 1.04 F 57,660 1.02 F -0.026D 56,300 42,390 0.75 C 45,114 0.80 C 0.05 No. Location
MidBlock
Lanes
Total
Capacity
6D 56,300 34,040 0.60 A 34,348 0.61 B 0.01 NO
90 TABLE 14 (CONT'D)

FUTURE STREET SEGMENT DAILY OPERATING CONDITIONS
Future without
Project Conditions
Future with
Project Conditions
Daily
Trips V/C Ratio LOS Daily Trips V/C Ratio LOS Change

14. Katella Avenue
Anaheim Boulevard to Manchester Avenue

15. Katella Avenue
Manchester Avenue to Anaheim Way

16. Orangewood Avenue
West Street to Harbor Boulevard

17. Orangewood Avenue
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street

18. Orangewood Avenue
Clementine Street to Haster Street

19. Orangewood Avenue
Haster Street to Manchester Avenue

20. Walnut Street
Ball Road to Cerritos Avenue

21. Walnut Street
Cerritos Avenue to Katella Avenue

22. Disneyland Drive
Manchester Avenue to Ball Road

23. Disneyland Drive
Ball Road to Magic Way

24. Disneyland Drive
Magic Way to Katella Avenue

25. West Street
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue

26. Harbor Boulevard
Ball Road to I-5
Notes:

Arterial segment capacities from Table 7.[a] Deficient locations (LOS D or worse under Future with Project Conditions based on daily traffic volumes) are further analyzed for peak hour operating conditions in Table 15.

Deficient
Location
[a]

NONONONO
YES
NO
YESYES
NO
YES
NONO
YES
8D 75,000 59,460 0.79 C 65,487 0.87 D 0.084U 25,000 15,030 0.60 A 14,777 0.59 A -0.01

0.52 A -0.35
34,500 0.92 E 31,372 0.84
4D 37,500 32,800 0.87 D 19,6534D 37,500 D -0.086D 56,300 42,930 0.76 C 42,930 0.76 C 0.004D 37,500 16,430 0.44 A 16,430 0.44 A 0.00

1.04 F 0.00
4D 37,500 17,740 0.47 A 17,740 0.474U 25,000 25,910 1.04 F 25,943 A 0.00
4D 37,500 21,480 0.57 A 29,139 0.78 C 0.214D 37,500 21,850 0.58 A 25,451 0.68 B 0.104U 25,000 22,670 0.91 E 22,670 0.91 E 0.008D 75,000 53,740 0.72 C 55,250 0.74 C 0.02 No. Location
MidBlock
Lanes
Total
Capacity
8D 75,000 57,710 0.77 C 61,891 0.83 D 0.06
91 TABLE 14 (CONT'D)

FUTURE STREET SEGMENT DAILY OPERATING CONDITIONS
Future without
Project Conditions
Future with
Project Conditions
Daily
Trips V/C Ratio LOS Daily Trips V/C Ratio LOS Change

27. Harbor Boulevard
Manchester Avenue to Disney Way

28. Harbor Boulevard
Disney Way to Katella Avenue

29. Harbor Boulevard
Katella Avenue to Convention Way

30. Harbor Boulevard
Convention Way to Orangewood Avenue

31. Harbor Boulevard
Orangewood Avenue to Wilken Way

32. Clementine Street
Manchester Avenue to Disney Way

33. Clementine Street
Disney Way to Katella Avenue

34. Anaheim Boulevard
Ball Road to Cerritos Avenue

35. Anaheim Boulevard
Cerritos Avenue to I-5

36. Anaheim Boulevard
I-5 to Katella Avenue

37. Haster Street
Katella Avenue to Gene Autry Way

38. Haster Street
Gene Autry Way to Orangewood Avenue
Notes:

Arterial segment capacities from Table 7.[a] Deficient locations (LOS D or worse under Future with Project Conditions based on daily traffic volumes) are further analyzed for peak hour operating conditions in Table 15.

NO
Deficient
Location
[a]

YESYESYESYES
NO
YESYES
NONO
YESYES
6D 56,300 39,830 0.71 C 43,501 0.77 C 0.06

0.59 A 0.04
6D 56,300 25,290 0.45 A 33,991 0.606D 56,300 31,080 0.55 A 33,425 A 0.15
6D 56,300 55,320 0.98 E 56,599 1.01 F 0.036D 56,300 46,190 0.82 D 47,469 0.84 D 0.02

0.99 E 0.03
4U 25,000 8,470 0.34 A 10,419 0.424U 25,000 24,080 0.96 E 24,826 A 0.08
6D 56,300 50,410 0.90 D 52,151 0.93 E 0.036D 56,300 47,600 0.85 D 51,530 0.92 E 0.076D 56,300 50,570 0.90 D 59,157 1.05 F 0.156D 56,300 56,950 1.01 F 63,035 1.12 F 0.11 No. Location
MidBlock
Lanes
Total
Capacity
6D 56,300 54,670 0.97 E 60,473 1.07 F 0.10
92 TABLE 15

FUTURE STREET SEGMENT PEAK HOUR OPERATING CONDITIONS
Future with
Project Conditions
Volume
[b] V/C Ratio LOS

3. Ball Road AM 9,666 5,050 0.522 A
Disneyland Drive to Harbor Boulevard PM 7,158 5,107 0.713 C

4. Ball Road AM 5,174 3,821 0.739 C
Harbor Boulevard to Anaheim Boulevard PM 4,745 3,521 0.742 C

8. Katella Avenue AM 6,997 3,909 0.559 A
9th Street to Walnut Street PM 9,600 3,968 0.413 A

9. Katella Avenue AM 6,997 4,679 0.669 B
Walnut Street to Disneyland Drive PM 9,600 4,678 0.487 A

10. Katella Avenue AM 9,605 5,241 0.546 A
Disneyland Drive to Hotel Way PM 8,630 4,931 0.571 A

11. Katella Avenue AM 9,503 4,847 0.510 A
Hotel Way to Harbor Boulevard PM 8,697 5,851 0.673 B

12. Katella Avenue AM 9,503 5,008 0.527 A
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street PM 8,697 6,016 0.692 B

13. Katella Avenue AM 9,215 5,202 0.565 A
Clementine Street to Anaheim Boulevard PM 8,660 6,555 0.757 C

14. Katella Avenue AM 9,215 5,549 0.602 B
Anaheim Boulevard to Manchester Avenue PM 8,660 6,461 0.746 C

16. Orangewood Avenue AM 4,143 2,070 0.500 A
West Street to Harbor Boulevard PM 2,746 2,230 0.812 D

19. Orangewood Avenue AM 3,605 1,768 0.490 A
Haster Street to Manchester Avenue PM 3,031 2,069 0.683 B Notes:
[a] Roadway capacities calculated based on 1,900 vehicles per hour per lane multiplied by the percentage of green time allocated to traffic on the arterial street based on the ICU analysis of adjacent study intersections. [b] Total volume is the bi-directional peak hour traffic based on volumes through adjacent study intersections. 88844
Total
Capacity
[a]
8 No. Location Peak Hour Mid- Block Lanes
66668
93 TABLE 15 (CONT'D)

FUTURE STREET SEGMENT PEAK HOUR OPERATING CONDITIONS
Future with
Project Conditions
Volume
[b] V/C Ratio LOS

24. Disneyland Drive AM 2,811 2,158 0.768 C
Magic Way to Katella Avenue PM 2,868 2,525 0.880 D

26. Harbor Boulevard AM 8,691 5,662 0.651 B
Ball Road to I-5 PM 7,577 5,574 0.736 C

27. Harbor Boulevard AM 8,440 3,081 0.365 A
Manchester Avenue to Disney Way PM 6,922 4,199 0.607 B

28. Harbor Boulevard AM 8,440 3,205 0.380 A
Disney Way to Katella Avenue PM 6,922 4,282 0.619 B

29. Harbor Boulevard AM 6,583 3,425 0.520 A
Katella Avenue to Convention Way PM 6,010 4,252 0.707 C

30. Harbor Boulevard AM 6,583 3,483 0.529 A
Convention Way to Orangewood Avenue PM 6,010 4,190 0.697 B

31. Harbor Boulevard AM 4,591 2,983 0.650 B
Orangewood Avenue to Wilken Way PM 6,659 3,972 0.596 A

32. Clementine Street AM 2,446 1,543 0.631 B
Manchester Avenue to Disney Way PM 3,010 1,928 0.641 B

34. Anaheim Boulevard AM 5,547 3,220 0.580 A
Ball Road to Cerritos Avenue PM 6,027 3,700 0.614 B

35. Anaheim Boulevard AM 6,909 3,910 0.566 A
Cerritos Avenue to I-5 PM 6,242 4,720 0.756 C
Notes:
[a] Roadway capacities calculated based on 1,900 vehicles per hour per lane multiplied by the percentage of green time allocated to traffic on the arterial street based on the ICU analysis of adjacent study intersections. [b] Total volume is the bi-directional peak hour traffic based on volumes through adjacent study intersections.

No. Location Peak Hour Mid- Block Lanes Total Capacity [a] 6466668664
94 Chapter 5
Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation
The Study Area has substantial amounts of pedestrian traffic, especially in the core Disneyland Resort areas along Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard. It has limited bicycle traffic. This chapter summarizes the Project’s potential effects on pedestrian and bicycle activity and infrastructure.

PEDESTRIAN PATHS OF TRAVEL
Figure 6 shows a map of pedestrian routes within the DRSP and ARSP with the Project. These locations were reviewed for existing pedestrian activity during the peak hours based on crosswalk data from the traffic counts. At areas with high levels of pedestrian activity, pedestrians are typically in crosswalks during each signal cycle. Heavy pedestrian activity occurs on both sides of Harbor Boulevard between Manchester Avenue and Orangewood Avenue as well as on both sides of Katella Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Clementine Street. Heavy pedestrian activity also occurs on Disneyland Drive, including on the east side between Ball Road and Magic Way and crossings at Magic Way, Paradise Way, and Downtown Drive.

The Disneyland Resort and Anaheim Convention Center are the primary drivers of pedestrian activity, both of which attract and produce pedestrian trips from and to the surrounding restaurants and hotels. A limited number of pedestrians also walk between Disney-operated parking facilities, such as the Toy Story Lot, and the theme parks. For many of these trips, buses and shuttles provide popular alternatives to walking. Disney provides a tram service to carry guests from the West Parking Area to the west side of the theme park entry plaza and a bus service to carry guests from the Toy Story Lot to the East Esplanade transportation hub on the east side of the theme park entry plaza. A couple of the non-Disney hotels in the vicinity offer a complimentary guest shuttle to the East Esplanade. The ART system provides numerous short-hop routes throughout the Anaheim Resort area, including many that stop at the East Esplanade.

Additionally, OCTA, Riverside Transit, and Metro offer routes that stop at or adjacent to the East 95 Esplanade. Many of the pedestrian trips are, therefore, made not out of necessity but as a matter of convenience or expedience by guests who expect that the trip will be faster on foot.

It is important to note that The Anaheim Resort area also has a high rate of pedestrians using mobility assist devices such as strollers, scooters, and wheelchairs. Many theme park visitors are families with young children and many other guests are elderly or disabled. Therefore, the pedestrian network in The Anaheim Resort area was carefully designed to accommodate the variety of pedestrian types and abilities and all future plans must continue to ensure those accommodations are provided.

PROJECT EFFECTS ON PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE
The Project’s direct effects on pedestrian infrastructure would be generally limited to the streets that would be modified and would not negatively impact connectivity or safety within the Study Area. With the removal of the planned extensions of Clementine Street and Gene Autry Way, future sidewalks along those streets would also be eliminated, but there would be limited reason for pedestrians to traverse the length of either extension if it were installed. Despite the closure of Magic Way, pedestrian connectivity would be provided between the Theme Park District and Walnut Street. With the development of a parking structure in the East Parking Area of the Parking District, there would not be a pedestrian sidewalk on the north side of Disney Way adjacent to the structure. However, a pedestrian pathway would connect the East Parking Area to the sidewalk west of the East Parking Area continuing west to Harbor Boulevard.

Most of the pedestrian infrastructure proposed as part of the current DRSP and ARSP has been implemented. One key feature that has yet to be implemented, and that would continue to be proposed as part of the Project, is construction of at least one and up to three pedestrian bridges spanning Harbor Boulevard as part of development of the East Parking Area, which would help to reduce at-grade pedestrian crossings, improving safety as well as traffic operations. The Project would also include the installation of a pedestrian signal on Walnut Street at Magic Way, which would be a new pedestrian feature.

The Project’s direct effects on pedestrian activity would be primarily concentrated around areas of new development where there is currently only surface parking. For example, development of 96 the East Parking Area would substantially increase pedestrian activity across Harbor Boulevard (though that activity would be separated from street traffic by at least one and up to three pedestrian bridges). Development of hotel and/or theme park space in the Southeast District or Theme Park East Overlay area would reduce pedestrian traffic currently traveling between the Toy Story Lot and the theme parks because there would no longer be a large guest parking area serving the Theme Park District (approximately 5-9% of guests currently parking at Toy Story Lot currently walk rather than take Disney’s complimentary bus to the theme parks based on a pedestrian study conducted by Disney).

PROJECT EFFECTS ON BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE
The Project would directly affect bicycle infrastructure on streets with existing or proposed bicycle infrastructure adjacent to the Project Site that could have new or modified access, including Walnut Street, Disney Way, Ball Road, and Haster Street. As previously described, the Project includes amendments to the General Plan Circulation Element and the City’s Bicycle Master Plan to modify the classification of the planned bike facility on Walnut Street between Katella Avenue and Ball Road from Class II Bike Lanes to a Class I Bike Path on the east side of Walnut Street.

Similarly, it would modify the planned bike path in the Southern California Edison property north of Disney Way to travel between Anaheim Boulevard and Clementine Street instead of Harbor Boulevard.

On Walnut Street, Disney would install a Class I Bike Path with a single two-way, off-street, shared-use pathway for pedestrians and bicycles with a minimum width of 10 feet on the east side of the street from Ball Road to Katella Avenue. On Disney Way, Disney would install a Class I Bike Path on the north side of Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard and Clementine Street and a single two-way, off-street, shared-use pathway for pedestrians and bicycles with a minimum width of 10 feet on the west side of Clementine Street between Alro Way and Disney Way. It would also install a bike parking facility in the East Parking Area and/or the Parking Overlay just north of the East Parking Area. On Haster Street, the Project proposes to install a new signalized intersection to the Southeast District south of Katella Avenue17. This would not conflict with planned Class II Bicycle Lanes on Haster Street but would add one additional signalized crossing 17 This action would be subject to a traffic signal warrant analysis. 97 point for bicyclists. The Project does not propose any changes along Ball Road, and any access improvements on that street would be designed to accommodate planned Class II Bicycle Lanes as needed.

The Project would also indirectly affect bicycle infrastructure through the removal of planned extensions of Clementine Street and Gene Autry Way. These changes would modify traffic volumes and intersection configurations on Haster Street at Gene Autry Way and on Orangewood Avenue at Clementine Street, which have existing or planned Class II Bike Lanes.

98 Chapter 6
Transportation Improvements
This chapter identifies potential intersection modifications to address operational issues resulting from the Project based on City criteria and standards. Some of the potential modifications were determined to be infeasible, and so this chapter further identifies which improvements are feasible and recommended for implementation. This chapter also summarizes the transportation-related PDFs and MMs from the DR EIR and ARSP SEIR that apply to the Project.

INTERSECTION MODIFICATIONS CONSIDERED BASED ON ICU ANALYSIS Intersection deficiencies were identified based on either meeting the City’s sliding scale for Project-level increase to V/C ratio or causing or worsening LOS E or F conditions based on the ICU analysis presented in Table 11. Under the sliding scale criteria, the Project would result in a deficiency if it increased the intersection V/C ratio by 0.05 or more for an intersection operating at LOS C, by 0.03 or more for an intersection operating at LOS D, or by 0.01 or more for an intersection operating at LOS E or F. As shown in Table 16, Future Intersection Operating Conditions and Modifications Considered – Intersection Capacity Utilization Methodology, the following 11 intersections meet one or both criteria:
 Intersection #6, Ox Road / Cast Place & Ball Road (sliding scale)  Intersection #7, Harbor Boulevard & Ball Road (sliding scale and LOS E or F)  Intersection #11, Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way (sliding scale)  Intersection #12, Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue (sliding scale and LOS E)  Intersection #14, Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue (sliding scale and LOS E)  Intersection #16, Clementine Street & Katella Avenue (sliding scale and LOS E)  Intersection #18, Anaheim Boulevard & Ball Road (LOS E) 99  Intersection #21, Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps / Manchester Avenue (sliding scale)
 Intersection #22, Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue (sliding scale and LOS E)
 Intersection #24, Haster Street & Orangewood Avenue (sliding scale and LOS E)  Intersection #25, Manchester Avenue / I-5 Southbound Ramps & Katella Avenue (sliding scale)
Intersection Modifications Considered
The severity of the deficiencies identified above varies, as does the feasibility of improving them.

Two of the identified locations are located at Project access points (Intersections #6 and #16) and will be subject to a focused access analysis if and when any Project development is proposed that would take public vehicular access through those intersections. Several locations with sliding scale deficiencies would still operate at LOS D or better (Intersections #6, #11, #21, and #25), which is within the City’s General Plan standard and, therefore, may not warrant modification. The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations as part of the ARSP SEIR for two locations (Intersections #7 and #22), as further improvement to those intersections was found to be infeasible. Two locations (Intersections #21 and #25) are at Caltrans ramp locations and, thus, are outside of the City’s jurisdiction to approve changes.

Nonetheless, consistent with the City Guidelines, Table 16 identifies modifications considered for each of the intersections found to be deficient along with the ICU results with implementation of the modifications. The feasibility of these modifications is further discussed below.  Intersection #6, Ox Road / Cast Place & Ball Road: The sliding scale deficiency at Intersection #6 could be reduced by converting the eastbound right-turn lane to a shared through/right-turn lane. However, this would require providing a fourth through lane east of the intersection, which leads directly to the Ball Road overpass over I-5, which only provides three lanes and is under Caltrans jurisdiction. Therefore, this improvement is infeasible due to the lack of available ROW and the lack of jurisdiction. Nonetheless, this sliding scale deficiency occurs at LOS D, which is an acceptable operating condition under the City’s General Plan Circulation Element. Further, the primary cause of the deficiency is the assumption that up to 906 hotel rooms would be constructed using the south leg of Intersection #6 for guest vehicular access, which may never occur and, thus, the Projectrelated deficiency may never materialize. As such, rather than identify a specific improvement as part of this study, Disney would be required to conduct an access analysis 100
at such time as Disney applies for a permit to construct any Project development that would cause 100 or more peak hour vehicle trips to take public access from this intersection. The access analysis would examine LOS and queuing at Intersection #6 with the proposed development, and any deficiencies identified in that analysis would be remedied to the City’s satisfaction.
 Intersection #7, Harbor Boulevard & Ball Road: The deficiencies at Intersection #7 could be reduced through widening the intersection to add a fourth northbound, southbound, and eastbound through lane and a second eastbound right-turn lane.

However, these modifications would require acquisition of private ROW and would require approval from Caltrans for modifications to the west leg of the intersection. Therefore, this improvement is infeasible due to the lack of available ROW and the lack of jurisdiction.

The ARSP SEIR also identified a deficiency at this location and found the same improvements to be infeasible, and the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for this location.
 Intersection #11, Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way: The sliding scale deficiency at Intersection #11 could be reduced through widening the westbound approach to add a third westbound left-turn lane and restriping the westbound through lane to provide a shared through/right-turn lane. The existing pedestrian crosswalk across the north leg of the intersection would be removed in conjunction with the dual westbound right-turn lanes.

Pedestrians would cross Harbor Boulevard on the south side of the intersection and at one or more pedestrian bridges over Harbor Boulevard between Disney Way and Manchester Avenue constructed as part of the Project. This improvement is feasible within the available ROW with the removal of the center median on Disney Way and narrowing of the sidewalks on the north and south side of Disney Way approaching Harbor Boulevard and is, therefore, recommended for implementation.
 Intersection #12, Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue: The deficiencies at Intersection #12 could be reduced through widening to provide a third northbound left-turn lane and exclusive eastbound and westbound right-turn lanes. However, these modifications would require acquisition of private ROW and are, therefore, infeasible. This intersection is a CMP intersection and, as such, LOS E is considered an acceptable operating condition.

Also, the City is exploring options to accommodate pedestrians above-grade rather than in crosswalks, which would substantially increase vehicular capacity and improve traffic flow through the intersection. Disney would contribute to operational improvements for the Harbor Boulevard corridor to address the deficiency, as further described below.  Intersection #14, Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue: The deficiencies at Intersection #14 could be reduced through modification of the northbound and southbound approaches to provide dual left-turn lanes and widening the eastbound approach to provide an exclusive right-turn lane. The left-turn lanes can be installed within the existing ROW through removal of the center medians and narrowing of the sidewalks on Harbor Boulevard and are, therefore, feasible. The eastbound right-turn lane would require acquisition of private ROW and is, therefore, infeasible. With only the feasible improvements in place, the morning peak hour sliding scale deficiency would be reduced but not eliminated, and the intersection would remain at LOS E. The afternoon peak hour deficiencies would be eliminated and, therefore, the feasible improvements are recommended for implementation. Disney would contribute to operational improvements for the Harbor Boulevard corridor to address the remaining deficiency, as further described below.
101
 Intersection #16, Clementine Street & Katella Avenue: The deficiencies at Intersection #16 could be reduced (though not fully eliminated) through modification of the southbound approach to provide dual left-turn lanes. The additional turn lane can be installed within the existing ROW through removal of the center median and is, therefore, feasible. With this improvement in place, the morning peak hour sliding scale deficiency would be eliminated and the afternoon peak hour deficiency would be substantially reduced, including reducing the LOS back to LOS D, which is an acceptable operating condition under the City’s General Plan Circulation Element. Further, the primary cause of the deficiency is the assumption that up to 1,852 hotel rooms would be constructed using the south leg of Intersection #16 for guest vehicular access, which may never occur and, thus, the Project-related deficiency may never materialize. As such, rather than identify a specific improvement as part of this study, Disney would be required to conduct an access analysis at such time as Disney applies for a permit to construct any Project development that would cause 100 or more additional peak hour vehicle trips to take public access from this intersection. The access analysis would examine LOS and queuing at Intersection #16 with the proposed development, and any deficiencies identified in that analysis would be remedied to the City’s satisfaction.
 Intersection #18, Anaheim Boulevard & Ball Road: The deficiency at Intersection #18 could be reduced through modifying the northbound right-turn lane to also allow through movements. This would require widening north of Ball Road for a fourth receiving lane, which would require the acquisition of private ROW and is, thus, infeasible. The Projectrelated increase to V/C ratio at this intersection is less than 0.01 during the afternoon peak hour, though it causes the intersection LOS to worsen from LOS D (right at the LOS E threshold) to LOS E.
 Intersection #21, Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps / Manchester Avenue: This intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction. See next section for discussion of potential improvements, which would require approval from Caltrans.  Intersection #22, Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue: The deficiencies at Intersection #22 could be reduced through widening to provide a fourth northbound through lane and a third southbound left-turn lane. These improvements would require the acquisition of private ROW and are, thus, infeasible. The ARSP SEIR also identified a deficiency at this location and found the same improvements to be infeasible, and the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for this location.  Intersection #24, Haster Street & Orangewood Avenue: The deficiencies at Intersection #24 could be reduced through modifying the northbound and southbound approaches to provide dual left-turn lanes and modifying the westbound right-turn lane to provide a shared through/right-turn lane. The northbound and southbound left-turn lanes could be installed within the future ROW required for the intersection under the City’s Planned Roadway Network configuration for this location. Because the ROW needed for the currently planned configuration of this intersection has not yet been acquired by the City, the additional northbound and southbound left-turn lanes are not yet feasible.

However, the City’s Planned Roadway Network map could be modified to incorporate the dual left-turn lanes such that they could be installed directly by the City once the ROW is obtained. However, the modification of the westbound right-turn lane (which is a future lane planned for installation under the Planned Roadway Network map) to a shared through/right-turn lane would require widening the westbound departure lanes on the west side of the intersection. This would require additional private ROW and is, thus, infeasible. 102
 Intersection #25, Manchester Avenue / I-5 Southbound Ramps & Katella Avenue:

This intersection is under Caltrans jurisdiction. See next section for discussion of potential improvements, which would require approval from Caltrans.

Operational Improvements
Five of the locations identified above, including Intersections #7, #12, and #14 on Harbor Boulevard and #18 and #22 on Anaheim Boulevard, would still operate at LOS E because the modifications considered above were found to be infeasible18. In lieu of direct improvements to these locations, the Project proposes to provide funding that could be used at the discretion of the City Traffic Engineer for operational improvements within The Anaheim Resort. The amount of the operational improvement funding would be determined by agreement between the City and Disney based on preliminary engineering estimates of the costs of implementing infeasible improvements, including ROW acquisition costs.

MODIFICATIONS CONSIDERED AT CALTRANS INTERSECTIONS
Caltrans intersection deficiencies were identified based on the Project causing or worsening LOS E or F conditions based on the HCM analysis presented in Table 12. Intersection #21, Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps / Manchester Avenue, causes LOS E operations in the afternoon peak hour. Additionally, Intersection #25, Manchester Avenue / I-5 Southbound Ramps & Katella Avenue, would have a sliding scale deficiency under the City’s criteria using the ICU methodology as described above. Both locations were reviewed for potential modifications to address the deficiencies. These are summarized below and in Table 17, Future Caltrans Intersection Operating Conditions and Modifications Considered – Highway Capacity Manual Methodology, along with the HCM results assuming implementation of the modifications.  Intersection #21, Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps / Manchester Avenue: The deficiency at Intersection #21 could be reduced (resulting in LOS D conditions during both peak hours) through restriping the northbound approach to provide a second left-turn lane along with modifying the traffic signal to use a lead-lag phasing to 18 In the case of Intersection #14, Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue, the identified modifications were partially feasible, but the addition of an eastbound right-turn lane was found infeasible, resulting in LOS E conditions during the morning peak hour.
103
separate the northbound and southbound left-turn signal phases. This modification is feasible within the existing available ROW.
 Intersection #25, Manchester Avenue / I-5 Southbound Ramps & Katella Avenue:

The deficiency at Intersection #25 could be reduced through restriping the northbound approach to provide one left-turn lane and two right-turn lanes along with modifying the traffic signal to eliminate the north-south split phasing. This modification is feasible within the existing available ROW.

Both of these modifications are physically and operationally feasible but would require approval from Caltrans, which cannot be guaranteed. Disney would work with Caltrans to review and potentially implement these modifications.

MODIFICATIONS CONSIDERED FOR INTERSECTION QUEUES
Turn movement queue deficiencies were identified where the Project would add at least 25 feet of queueing (approximately one car-length), causing or lengthening a turn pocket exceedance during one or both peak hours. As shown in Table 18, Future Conditions Queueing and Modifications Considered, the following 13 intersections are projected to have one or more turn movements meeting these criteria based on the 95th percentile queue:
 Intersection #2, Flore Street / West Place & Ball Road (westbound left-turn lanes)  Intersection #6, Ox Road / Cast Place & Ball Road (westbound left-turn lanes)  Intersection #7, Harbor Boulevard & Ball Road (eastbound right-turn lane)  Intersection #10, Harbor Boulevard & Manchester Avenue (southbound left-turn lane)  Intersection #11, Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way (southbound and westbound left-turn lanes)
 Intersection #12, Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue (northbound right-turn lane, westbound left-turn lanes)
 Intersection #14, Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue (southbound left-turn lane)  Intersection #16, Clementine Street & Katella Avenue (southbound left-turn lane)  Intersection #21, Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps / Manchester Avenue (northbound left-turn lane)
104
 Intersection #22, Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue (southbound and westbound left-turn lanes, southbound right-turn lane)
 Intersection #23, Haster Street & Gene Autry Way (southbound left-turn lanes)  Intersection #24, Haster Street & Orangewood Avenue (northbound and southbound leftturn lanes)  Intersection #25, Manchester Avenue / I-5 Southbound Ramps & Katella Avenue (eastbound right-turn lane)
Potential Turn Pocket Modifications
There are many factors that affect queue lengths at turn pockets, including vehicular traffic volumes, pedestrian traffic volumes, crossing distances, and signal cycle lengths and timing settings. Additionally, because the Project allows for a range of development in various places, and the analysis in this report is based on a General Plan buildout condition that assumes substantial amounts of new development (including non-Project development) over a long period of time within the Study Area, the results of the queue analysis are hypothetical. Further, as Table 13 shows, many of the deficiencies identified using the 95th percentile queue length would not occur under the 50th percentile queue length, which is a much more common operation.

Nonetheless, Table 18 identifies locations where either the turn pockets could potentially be extended or where feasible intersection improvements (based on the potential improvements identified in Tables 16 and 17) could reduce queueing based on deficiencies identified using the 95th percentile queue length. These are further discussed below.  Intersection #2, Flore Street / West Place & Ball Road: The westbound left-turn pocket at this location would be deficient without the Project. Potential Project development taking access from this location could worsen the queues. Should the Project propose development that would trigger an access analysis at this location (as further discussed below), such an analysis would include evaluating queuing. Should feasible and necessary improvements be identified at that time, the Project would be required to implement those improvements as a condition of approval.  Intersection #6, Ox Road / Cast Place & Ball Road: The westbound left-turn pocket at this location would be deficient without the Project. Potential Project development taking access from this location could worsen the queues. Should the Project propose development that would trigger an access analysis at this location (as further discussed below), such an analysis would include evaluating queuing. Should feasible and necessary improvements be identified at that time, the Project would be required to implement those improvements as a condition of approval. 105
 Intersection #7, Harbor Boulevard & Ball Road: The eastbound right-turn pocket at this location would be deficient without the Project and Project development is forecast to worsen the queue by at least one car-length during the morning and afternoon peak hours.

It is infeasible to lengthen the eastbound right-turn pocket due to lack of ROW and the proximity to Caltrans facilities. It should be noted the ARSP SEIR identified a LOS deficiency at this location and the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations due to no feasible improvements.
 Intersection #10, Harbor Boulevard & Manchester Avenue: The southbound left-turn pocket at this location would be deficient without the Project. Project development is forecast to worsen the queue by at least one car-length. It is feasible to lengthen the southbound left-turn pocket to accommodate the forecast queue. Though this could likely be accommodated without affecting Caltrans ROW, it would reduce the length of a northbound through lane leading to Intersection #9 (Harbor Boulevard & I-5 Southbound Ramps) and, therefore, would be subject to review by Caltrans.  Intersection #11, Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way: The southbound and westbound left-turn pockets are forecast to be deficient with implementation of the Project. However, the improvement proposed at this intersection in Table 16 – including adding a third westbound left-turn lane and removing the pedestrian crosswalk across the north leg of the intersection – would reduce queue lengths below the lengths of the turn pockets.  Intersection #12, Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue: The northbound right-turn pocket and westbound left-turn pockets are forecast to be deficient with implementation of the Project. It is infeasible to lengthen the northbound right-turn pocket due to lack of ROW. However, it is feasible to lengthen the westbound left-turn pocket, but it would require removal of landscaping in the center median. Alternatively, double-servicing the westbound left-turn pocket would reduce the westbound left-turn queue to 193 feet during the morning peak hour (less than the condition without the Project) and to 337 feet during the afternoon peak hour (only 34 feet more than the condition without the Project) while minimally affecting other queues or overall intersection delay.  Intersection #14, Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue: The southbound left-turn pocket is forecast to be deficient with implementation of the Project. However, the improvement proposed at this intersection in Table 16 – including the addition of a second southbound left-turn lane – would reduce the queue length below the length of the turn pocket.
 Intersection #16, Clementine Street & Katella Avenue: The southbound left-turn pocket at this location would be deficient without the Project. Project development is forecast to worsen the queue by at least one car-length. However, the improvement proposed at this intersection in Table 16 – consisting of the addition of a second southbound left-turn lane – would reduce the queue length below the length of the turn pocket.  Intersection #21, Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps / Manchester Avenue: The northbound left-turn pocket at this location would be deficient without the Project. Project development is forecast to worsen the queue length by at least one carlength. However, the improvement proposed at this intersection in Table 17 – consisting of the addition of a second northbound left-turn lane – would reduce the queue below the length of the turn pocket.
106
 Intersection #22, Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue: The southbound and westbound left-turn pockets and the southbound right-turn pocket at this location would be deficient without the Project. Project development is forecast to worsen the queues by at least one car-length at those three turn pockets. It is infeasible to lengthen the southbound right-turn pocket due to lack of ROW. However, it is feasible to lengthen the southbound and westbound left-turn pockets, though both would require removal of landscaping in the center median. Alternatively, double-servicing the southbound and westbound left-turn pockets has potential to reduce the queues but would increase queues at through movements as well as increase overall vehicle delay. It should be noted the ARSP SEIR identified a LOS deficiency at this location and the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations due to no feasible improvements.  Intersection #23, Haster Street & Gene Autry Way: The southbound left-turn pocket at this location is forecast to be deficient with implementation of the Project. This intersection is not yet at its final buildout configuration under the City’s Planned Roadway Network.

There is space to install a longer turn pocket than the City’s standard length of 300 feet.

Therefore, it is recommended that the design for the buildout configuration study the need to incorporate a longer southbound left-turn pocket to address the potential queue deficiency.
 Intersection #24, Haster Street & Orangewood Avenue: The northbound and southbound left-turn pockets are forecast to be deficient with implementation of the Project. However, the improvement proposed at this intersection in Table 16 – including the addition of second northbound and southbound left-turn lanes – would reduce the queue lengths below the lengths of the turn pockets.
 Intersection #25, Manchester Avenue / I-5 Southbound Ramps & Katella Avenue:

The eastbound right-turn pocket is forecast to be deficient with implementation of the Project. It is infeasible to increase the turn pocket length, as it extends to the adjacent upstream intersection to the west (Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street). However, the improvement proposed at this intersection in Table 17 – including the modification of the northbound approach to a more efficient configuration – would help to reduce queuing at the eastbound right-turn pocket.

STREET SEGMENTS
Street segment deficiencies would occur if any segment were found to operate at LOS E during one or both peak hours. As shown in Table 15, none of the street segments would operate at LOS E during the peak hours and, therefore, no segment deficiencies were identified, and no improvements are warranted.
107

RECOMMENDED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
From the potential intersection modifications identified in Tables 16 through 18, Table 19, Recommended Intersection Improvements, summarizes those improvements recommended for implementation by the Project. It includes the feasible intersection improvements identified above, along with operational improvements and intersections subject to access and queuing analyses.

Table 19 also identifies the development that would trigger the need for each improvement. The triggers, most of which are tied to the generation of 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips, are designed such that the improvements would not be required upon development of a land use that does not generate trips (such as a new security booth or restrooms), but that they would be triggered upon development of the first substantive Project components that would contribute traffic to each location. The 100-trip threshold would be met with net new the development of approximately 800 theme park parking spaces or 250 hotel rooms19 based on the trip generation rates in Table 10.

OTHER TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
Table 20, Other Transportation Improvements, summarizes transportation-related PDFs that the Project would incorporate, along with the timing or development trigger for each feature. Many of the triggers are tied to specific actions taken by Disney as part of Project development, such as the requirement to install a pedestrian signal on Walnut Street at Magic Way upon closure of Magic Way to public through traffic. Others are identified by specific trip generation thresholds as with the transportation improvements identified above, and others are on-going or tied to the technical results of access analyses.

Additionally, the Project is required to continue to operate The Disneyland Resort’s TDM program to encourage, incentivize, and facilitate cast members’ choices to use alternative travel modes, alternative work schedules, and clean air vehicles. It includes a variety of measures including:

19 These development thresholds are noted for reference only. The need to implement improvements would be identified based on a calculation of net new peak hour trips, regardless of whether or not these approximate development thresholds are met.
108
 Bicycle parking and amenities
 Online ride-matching and carpool/vanpool programs
 Guaranteed return trip
 Incentives for using alternative travel modes
 Flex schedule and telecommuting
 Electric vehicle parking and incentives
 Shuttle services
 Promotions, marketing, and education

DRSP AND ARSP MITIGATION MEASURES AND PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES The Project would be subject to MMs and PDFs from the DR EIR and ARSP SEIR to the extent they have not already been implemented. A summary of those measures is provided below, and the full text of each measure is provided in Appendix A.

The Disneyland Resort Project Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0067  MM 3.3-1: Implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent.  MM 3.3-2: Pay appropriate traffic signal assessment fees.  MM 3.3-3A: Dedicate the ultimate rights-of-way for arterial highways and intersections on or adjacent to parcels under Disney ownership. [Completed.]  MM 3.3-3B: Dedicate the ultimate rights-of-way for any properties acquired by Disney in the future adjacent to arterial highways.
 MM 3.3-4: Guest transportation systems will move guests from the parking facilities to the Theme Park District. [Completed.]
 MM 3.3-5: A bus and shuttle drop-off area will be located adjacent to Harbor Boulevard north of Disney Way. It may be located adjacent or internal to the East Parking Area parking structure. [Completed.]
109
 MM 3.3-6: Implement the traffic improvements identified in Table 3.3-16 [of Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0067] in accordance with the phasing plan approved by the City Engineer. [Completed.]
 MM 3.3-8: Add eastbound and westbound dual left-turn lanes and an eastbound right-turn lane to Intersection #16, Clementine Street & Katella Avenue; Add a southbound right-turn pocket to the entrance to the Southeast District on Haster Street and provide west half-width of a six-lane arterial south of Katella Avenue to the southern property line of the Southeast District. [Completed.]
 MM 3.3-9: Add a westbound right-turn lane at Intersection #18, Anaheim Boulevard & Ball Road; Modify Intersection #6, Ox Road / Cast Place & Ball Road to provide (1) a minimum of 150 feet of dual lane storage or a minimum of 250 feet of single-lane storage for the westbound left-turn lane, (2) an eastbound right-turn pocket with 250 feet of storage, and (3) three inbound and a minimum of two outbound lanes and an entrance gate at least 400 feet south of Ball Road serving the Disneyland Administration Building entrance. [Completed.]
 PDF 3.3-1: Public parking facilities at the Southeast District and/or the East Parking Area will be oriented to receive northbound I-5 traffic.
 PDF 3.3-2: Access roads leading to the parking facilities shall be sized to accommodate peak hour traffic.
 PDF 3.3-3: Building plans shall show direct ramps to each level of the East Parking Area facilities and accommodate a “speed parking” operation.  PDF 3.3-4: Guest transportation systems will move guests from the parking facilities to the Theme Park District.
 PDF 3.3-5: A bus and shuttle drop-off area will be located adjacent to Harbor Boulevard north of Disney Way. It may be located adjacent or internal to the East Parking Area parking structure.
 PDF 3.3-4: Conveyance systems will transport Disneyland Resort guests around the project.  PDF 3.3-5: A theme park drop-off area for buses and shuttles will be located adjacent to Harbor Boulevard north of Disney Way or internal to the East Parking Area of the Parking District or another accessible location.
 PDF 3.3-6: A mixed-flow off-ramp from southbound I-5 to Disneyland Drive will replace the existing Ball Road off-ramp as part of Caltrans’ I-5 Widening Project. [Completed.]  PDF 3.3-7: A two-lane flyover overcrossing will be constructed over Intersection #4, Disneyland Drive & Ball Road, to provide convenient access between I-5 and the West Parking Area. [Completed.]
 PDF 3.3-8: Signalized intersections will be provided at major hotel entrances along Disneyland Drive between Katella Avenue and Ball Road. [Completed.] 110
 PDF 3.3-9: Disney Way [formerly Freedman Way] will be widened to three through lanes, where possible, and necessary turn lanes, in each direction between Harbor Boulevard and I-5. [Completed.]
 PDF 3.3-10: The capacity of Walnut Street will be restrained from Katella Avenue to Ball Road to discourage increased traffic on Walnut Street. [Completed.]  PDF 3.3-11: Magic Way [formerly Cerritos Avenue] will be shifted north by approximately 1,100 feet between Walnut Street and Disneyland Drive and left-turns to and from Walnut Street will be prohibited. [Completed.]
 PDF 3.3-12: A high-occupancy-vehicle off-ramp will be constructed from southbound I-5 to Disneyland Drive as part of Caltrans’ I-5 Widening Project. [Completed.]  PDF 3.3-13: A high-occupancy vehicle off-ramp will be constructed from northbound I-5 to Disney Way [formerly Freedman Way] as part of Caltrans’ I-5 Widening Project. [Completed.]
 PDF 3.3-14: The following intersection improvements will be implemented unless otherwise indicated by the year 2001:
o Redesign Intersection #4, Disneyland Drive & Ball Road, to include an overcrossing. o Redesign Intersection #11, Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way, to accommodate three lanes eastbound and westbound and adding dual left-turn southbound lanes. o At Intersection #21, Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps / Manchester Avenue, add a third through lane eastbound and westbound and a second left-turn lane eastbound.
o At Intersection #15, Clementine Street & Disney Way, install third through lanes eastbound and westbound, left-turn lanes eastbound and westbound, second through lanes northbound and southbound, and a left-turn lane southbound.

Remove the right-turn lane northbound.
o Reconfigure the intersection of Walnut Street & Magic Way. o Reconfigure the intersection of Disneyland Drive & Magic Way [Completed.]
 PDF 3.3-15: Implement and administer a comprehensive TDM program for all cast, which will strive to achieve an average vehicle ridership goal of 1.5 persons per vehicle and an average length of out-of-area guest stay of 1.72 days.
 PDF 3.3-17: Explore other measures to achieve trip reductions, including the formation of a Disneyland Resort Transportation Management Association or an Anaheim Resort Area Transportation Management Association.
111
 MM 3.8-11: Reimburse the City for the use of any Anaheim Police Department or Anaheim Traffic Management Center personnel providing temporary traffic control services.  MM 3.8-12: Establish an on-site public information office and telephone hotline to provide construction scheduling and phasing information to the public.  PDF 3.8-1 through 3.8-8: Submit a Traffic Mitigation and Construction Phasing and Control Plan identifying a Construction Staging Area Plan (PDF 3.8-1), a Truck Route Plan (PDF

3.8-3), a Construction Traffic Management Plan (PDF 3.8-4), a Trip Reduction Plan (PDF

3.8-5), and a Traffic Management Plan (PDF 3.8-6).
 PDF 3.8-9: Submit a quarterly update report showing upcoming construction activities and including traffic mitigation and control planning.
 PDF 3.8-11: Show how the project will be in compliance with the Traffic Mitigation and Construction Phasing and Control Plan.

Several additional MMs and PDFs that relate to traffic are summarized in the Air Quality section of Subsequent EIR No. 352.

ARSP Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C
MMs identified in the ARSP Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C apply only to development at the Disney ARSP Properties and only to the extent there is no similar or identical MMs in The Disneyland Resort Project Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0067. The following measures may apply:
 MM 5.14-1: Prepare a traffic improvement phasing analysis.  MM 5.14-2: Pay appropriate traffic signal assessment fees.  MM 5.14-3: Dedicate the ultimate rights-of-way adjacent to arterial highways.  MM 5.14-4: Join and financially participate in the ART system and the Anaheim Transportation Network.
 MM 5.14-5: Provide a plan to coordinate rideshare services for construction employees.  MM 5.14-6: Provide TDM measures for a hotel development that exceeds 100 rooms per gross acre.
112
 MM 5.14-7: Reimburse the City for the use of any Anaheim Police Department or Anaheim Traffic Management Center personnel providing temporary traffic control services during construction.
 MM 5.14-8: Record a covenant to implement and administer a comprehensive TDM program for all employees.
 MM 5.14-9: Prepare a TDM plan for review by the City Traffic Engineer.  MM 5.14-12: The City shall review the location of any proposed gates across a driveway.  MM 5.14-13: Building plans shall show all driveways with a minimum 15-foot radius curb return unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
 MM 5.14-14: Security in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, completion guarantee, or cash, shall be posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of all engineering requirements.
 MM 5.14-15: Implement traffic improvements as identified in the project traffic study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as defined by the City’s General Plan.  MM 5.14-16: Determine when intersection improvements shall be constructed.  MM 5.14-17: Identify any project traffic impacts within the City of Orange and pay the fair share responsibility for mitigating them.
 MM 5.14-18: Identify the project’s proportionate impact on freeway mainline and/or ramp locations and its fair share percentage responsibility. The City shall estimate the cost of the project’s responsibility.
 MM 5.14-19: Pay the identified fair share responsibility of improvements determined in MM

5.14-15.
 MM 5.14-20: Determine whether a bus stop is required to be placed adjacent to the property.  MM 5.14-21: Designate an on-site contact responsible for coordinating with the Anaheim Transportation Network and implementing mitigation measures.  MM 5.14-22: If the costs of identified improvements in the traffic study for the ARSP cannot be covered by the funding allocation under City fee programs and funding sources, develop an update to the City traffic fee program to ensure completion of the recommended improvements.

113
TABLE 16

FUTURE INTERSECTION OPERATING CONDITIONS AND MODIFICATIONS CONSIDERED

INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION METHODOLOGY
Future without
Project Conditions Future with Project Conditions Future with Project Conditions with Modifications Considered ICU LOS ICU LOS Change
Exceeds
Sliding
Scale
Criteria
Causes or
Worsens
LOS E
or F
Modifications Considered ICU LOS Change
Exceeds
Sliding
Scale
Criteria
Causes or
Worsens
LOS E
or F

6. Ox Rd / Cast Pl & AM 0.770 C 0.808 D 0.038 YES NO 0.717 C -0.053 NO NO [a,b] Ball Rd PM 0.720 C 0.737 C 0.017 NO NO 0.727 C 0.007 NO NO

7. Harbor Blvd & AM 1.100 F 1.115 F 0.015 YES YES 0.913 E -0.187 NO NO [c] Ball Rd PM 0.960 E 0.988 E 0.028 YES YES 0.922 E -0.038 NO NO

11. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.490 A 0.566 A 0.076 NO NO 0.655 B 0.165 NO NO [b] Disney Way PM 0.680 B 0.797 C 0.117 YES NO 0.720 C 0.040 NO NO

12. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.800 C 0.857 D 0.057 YES NO 0.820 D 0.020 NO NO [d] Katella Ave PM 0.950 E 0.951 E 0.001 NO YES 0.897 D -0.053 NO NO

14. Harbor Blvd & AM 0.850 D 0.959 E 0.109 YES YES 0.865 D 0.015 NO NO Orangewood Ave PM 0.900 D 0.915 E 0.015 YES YES 0.842 D -0.058 NO NO

16. Clementine St & AM 0.650 B 0.706 C 0.056 YES NO 0.691 B 0.041 NO NO [a] Katella Ave PM 0.850 D 0.983 E 0.133 YES YES 0.886 D 0.036 YES NO

18. Anaheim Blvd & AM 0.820 D 0.839 D 0.019 NO NO 0.839 D 0.019 NO NO Ball Rd PM 0.900 D 0.907 E 0.007 NO YES 0.846 D -0.054 NO NO

21. Anaheim Blvd & Disney Way AM 0.710 C 0.741 C 0.031 NO NO 0.741 C 0.031 NO NO [b,e] I-5 Ramps / Manchester Ave PM 0.850 D 0.889 D 0.039 YES NO 0.876 D 0.026 NO NO

22. Anaheim Blvd / Haster St & AM 0.900 D 0.946 E 0.046 YES YES 0.868 D -0.032 NO NO [c] Katella Ave PM 0.920 E 0.984 E 0.064 YES YES 0.880 D -0.040 NO NO

24. Haster St & AM 0.790 C 0.816 D 0.026 NO NO 0.771 C -0.019 NO NO Orangewood Ave PM 0.830 D 0.934 E 0.104 YES YES 0.838 D 0.008 NO NO

25. Manchester Ave / I-5 SB AM 0.770 C 0.790 C 0.020 NO NO 0.790 C 0.020 NO NO [b,d,e] Ramps & Katella Ave PM 0.790 C 0.849 D 0.059 YES NO 0.746 C -0.044 NO NO Notes:
[a] Provides direct access to the Project Site. This location would be subject to an access analysis upon development of portions of the Project taking public vehicular access through this intersection.[b] Intersection operates at level of service (LOS) D or better during both peak hours prior to improvement, which is an acceptable condition in the City of Anaheim General Plan.[c] Intersection has an adopted Statement of Overriding Considerations in Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340 for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan.[d] Designated Orange County Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program intersection.[e] Intersection is under Caltrans' jurisdiction.

No. Location Peak Hour
Convert NB approach to 1L, 2R,
eliminate split signal phase
Add NBL, SBL,
convert WBR to WBT/R
Add NBT, SBL
Add NBL, SBL, EBR
Convert NBR to NBT/R
Convert EBR to EBT/R
Add SBL
Add NBL, SBL, EBR
Add NBL, WBR, EBR
Add WBL, convert WBT to WBT/R,
eliminate north crosswalk
Add NBT, SBT, EBT, EBR
114
TABLE 17

FUTURE CALTRANS INTERSECTION OPERATING CONDITIONS AND MODIFICATIONS CONSIDERED

HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL METHODOLOGY
Future without
Project Conditions
Future with
Project Conditions
Future with Project Conditions with Modifications Considered Delay LOS Delay LOS Change Modifications Considered Delay LOS Change

21. Anaheim Blvd & Disney Way AM 43.5 D 45.3 D 1.8 NO 44.4 D 0.9 NO I-5 Ramps / Manchester Ave PM 53.8 D 58.1 E 4.3 YES 53.3 D -0.5 NO

25. Manchester Ave / I-5 SB AM 42.3 D 44.7 D 2.4 NO 35.4 D -6.9 NO [a] Ramps & Katella Ave PM 33.4 C 37.9 D 4.5 NO 36.3 D 2.9 NO Notes:

Results based on HCM 6th Edition Signalized methodology calculating average delay, in seconds, per vehicle.[a] Designated Orange County Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program intersection.

Convert NB approach to 1L, 2R,
eliminate split signal phase
Exceeds
Caltrans
Standard
No. Location Peak Hour Exceeds Caltrans Standard
Add NBL, SBL, EBR
115
TABLE 18

FUTURE CONDITIONS QUEUING AND MODIFICATIONS CONSIDERED
95th Percentile Queue Length
Without
Project
Conditions
With
Project
Conditions
Change
Intersection #2. Flore Street / West Place & Ball Road
Westbound Left-Turn 210 A.M. 397 421 24
[a] P.M. 296 328 32
Intersection #6. Ox Road / Cast Place & Ball Road
Westbound Left-Turn 220 A.M. 322 388 66
[a] P.M. 130 239 109
Intersection #7. Harbor Boulevard & Ball Road
Eastbound Right-Turn 200 A.M. 2,778 2,957 179
[a] P.M. 1,399 1,928 529
Intersection #10. Harbor Boulevard & Manchester Avenue
Southbound Left-Turn 130 A.M. 316 400 84
[a] P.M. 147 184 37
Intersection #11. Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way
Southbound Left-Turn (dual) 260 A.M. 258 291 33
[a] P.M. 159 223 64
Westbound Left-Turn (dual) 480 A.M. 128 207 79
[b] P.M. 408 569 161
Notes:

All lengths shown in feet as reported in the HCM analysis provided in Appendix F. Bolded values indicate queues exceed the turn pocket storage length. Queues are reported per lane. At dual turn lanes, the reported queue length would be experienced in each lane.[a] Existing turn pocket length.[b] Average length of two turn pockets.

Intersection
Turn
Pocket
Length
Peak
Hour Modifications Considered
Subject to Access Analysis.

See Table 19.

Subject to Access Analysis.

See Table 19.

SBL turn pocket could be lengthened
to accommodate queues.

Recommended intersection improvement
(add WBL, convert WBT to WBT/R,
eliminate north leg pedestrian crosswalk)
would reduce queues.

See Table 19.

Intersection subject to Statement of
Overriding Considerations in ARSP SEIR.

Infeasible to lengthen EBR turn pocket.
116
TABLE 18 (CONT'D)

FUTURE CONDITIONS QUEUING AND MODIFICATIONS CONSIDERED
95th Percentile Queue Length
Without
Project
Conditions
With
Project
Conditions
Change
Intersection #12. Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue
Northbound Right-Turn 300 A.M. 179 395 216
[a,c] P.M. 239 711 472
Westbound Left-Turn (dual) 300 A.M. 236 399 163
[a,c] P.M. 303 813 510
Intersection #14. Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue
Southbound Left-Turn 210 A.M. 92 273 181
[a,c] P.M. 154 298 144
Intersection #16. Clementine Street & Katella Avenue
Southbound Left-Turn 285 A.M. 142 140 -2
[a,c] P.M. 385 515 130
Intersection #21. Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps / Manchester Avenue Northbound Left-Turn 200 A.M. 140 208 68
[a] P.M. 410 487 77
Intersection #22. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue Southbound Left-Turn (dual) 240 A.M. 317 336 19
[a,c] P.M. 287 324 37
Southbound Right-Turn 170 A.M. 390 465 75
[a,c] P.M. 340 506 166
Westbound Left-Turn (dual) 270 A.M. 353 375 22
[a,c] P.M. 358 406 48
Notes:

All lengths shown in feet as reported in the HCM analysis provided in Appendix F. Bolded values indicate queues exceed the turn pocket storage length. Queues are reported per lane. At dual turn lanes, the reported queue length would be experienced in each lane.[a] Existing turn pocket length.[c] Turn pocket could be lengthened when intersection is upgraded to its full General Plan Circulation Element standard configuration (subject to City Final plans at construction).

Infeasible to lengthen NBR turn pocket
due to right-of-way constraints.

WBL turn pocket could be lengthened;
alternatively, double-servicing WBL could
reduce queues. See Table 19.

Intersection
Turn
Pocket
Length
Peak
Hour Modifications Considered
Recommended intersection improvement
(add SBL) would reduce queues.

See Table 19.

Recommended intersection improvement
(add NBL, SBL) would reduce queues.

See Table 19.

Recommended intersection improvement
(add NBL) would reduce queues
(subject to Caltrans approval).

See Table 19.

Intersection subject to Statement of
Overriding Considerations in ARSP SEIR.

Infeasible to lengthen SBR turn pocket.

SBL and WBL turn pockets could be
lengthened to accommodate queues.
117
TABLE 18 (CONT'D)

FUTURE CONDITIONS QUEUING AND MODIFICATIONS CONSIDERED
95th Percentile Queue Length
Without
Project
Conditions
With
Project
Conditions
Change
Intersection #23. Haster Street & Gene Autry Way
Southbound Left-Turn (dual) 300 A.M. 66 228 162
[d] P.M. 183 350 167
Intersection #24. Haster Street & Orangewood Avenue
Northbound Left-Turn 300 A.M. 92 154 62
[d] P.M. 252 402 150
Southbound Left-Turn 300 A.M. 181 159 -22
[d] P.M. 221 307 86
Intersection #25. Manchester Avenue / I-5 Southbound Ramps & Katella Avenue Eastbound Right-Turn (dual) 610 A.M. 561 652 91
[a] P.M. 514 630 116
Notes:

All lengths shown in feet as reported in the HCM analysis provided in Appendix F. Bolded values indicate queues exceed the turn pocket storage length. Queues are reported per lane. At dual turn lanes, the reported queue length would be experienced in each lane.[a] Existing turn pocket length.[d] Intersection is not yet built to its full configuration under the General Plan Circulation Element. Future turn pockets are assumed to be 300 feet in length per Engineering Standard Detail 164-C, except where physical space precludes that length.

Intersection
Turn
Pocket
Length
Peak
Hour
Infeasible to increase EBR turn pocket due
to distance to upstream intersection.

Turn pocket to be designed to
accommodate queues as needed upon
buildout to General Plan Standard.

Recommended intersection improvement
(add NBL, SBL) would reduce queues.

See Table 19.

Modifications Considered
118
TABLE 19

RECOMMENDED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
No. Location Recommended Improvement Improvement Trigger [a] Feasible Intersection Improvements [b]

11. Harbor Boulevard & Disney Way Add WBL, restripe WBT to shared WBT/R and eliminate north leg crosswalk Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, or at the Southeast District.

12. Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue Re-program the traffic signal to double-service the WBL turn lane to reduce WBL queuing Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

14. Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue Add NBL, SBL Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

16. Clementine Street & Katella Avenue Add SBL Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, or at the Southeast District.

22. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue
Lengthen SBL and WBL turn
pockets to accommodate queues
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

Improvements Subject to Caltrans Review or Approval [c]

10. Harbor Boulevard & Manchester Avenue Lengthen SBL turn pocket Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area or Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area.

21. Anaheim Boulevard & Disney Way / I-5 Ramps /Manchester Avenue Add NBL and reprogram signal
for lead-lag left-turn operation
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, or at the Southeast District.

25. Manchester Avenue / I-5 Southbound Ramps & Katella Avenue Restripe NB Approach to 1L, 2R
and remove split phase
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

Notes:
[a] Net trip generation estimates would be based on the trip rates Identified in Table 10 or the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual.

Peak hour public trips represent vehicle trips made from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. by resort guests. [b] Feasible improvements are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.[c] These improvements require Caltrans review or approval to be implemented, and therefore cannot be guaranteed by the City. 119
TABLE 19 (CONT'D)

RECOMMENDED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
No. Location Improvement Trigger [a]
Operational Improvement Funding

7. Harbor Boulevard & Ball Road Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips to or from HCML.

12. Harbor Boulevard & Katella Avenue
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

14. Harbor Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

18. Anaheim Boulevard & Ball Road Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips to or from HCML.

22. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street & Katella Avenue
Proposed development generating at least 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area, Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, at the Southeast District, or at the Theme Park East Overlay.

Intersections Subject to Access Analysis [d]

2. Flore Street / West Place & Ball Road Proposed development generating any net new peak hour vehicle trips to or from this access point. [e]

6. Ox Road / Cast Place & Ball Road Proposed development generating any net new public peak hour vehicle trips to or from this access point.

13. Harbor Boulevard & Convention Way / Toy Story Parking Proposed development generating at least 100 net new public peak hour vehicle trips to or from this access point.15. Clementine Street & Disney Way Proposed development generating at least 100 net new
public peak hour vehicle trips at the East Parking Area or Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area.

16. Clementine Street & Katella Avenue Proposed development generating at least 100 net new public peak hour vehicle trips to or from this access point.

Notes:
[a] Net trip generation estimates would be based on the trip rates Identified in Table 10 or the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual.

Peak hour public trips represent vehicle trips made from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. by resort guests. [d] An access analysis would examine level of service (LOS) and queuing at the public vehicular access points for a given development and identify any necessary improvements for proper functioning of those access points, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. [e] At this location, the access analysis would include consideration of adding an additional access point to the Ball Cast Member Lot on Ball Road. 120
TABLE 20

OTHER TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
No. Project Design Feature Timing

1. Install pedestrian signal on Walnut Street at Magic Way. To be installed upon closure of Magic Way to public through traffic.2. Install Class I Bike Path on the east side of Walnut Street from Ball Road to Katella Avenue. To be installed prior to final Building and Zoning Inspection for cumulative development of at least 10,000 square feet in the southwestern portion of the Theme Park District (south of Paradise Way and west of the Paradise Pier Hotel parking structure).3.

Install Class I Bike Path on the north side of Disney Way between Clementine Street Anaheim Boulevard, a Class I Bike Path on the west side of Clementine Street between Alro Way and Disney Way, and a bicycle parking facility in the East Parking Area and/or the adjacent Parking Overlay.

To be installed with construction of a parking structure or transportation facility, whichever is earlier, at the East Parking Area or the Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area.

4. Install pedestrian bridge(s) over Harbor Boulevard with public access to/from the sidewalk on Harbor Boulevard. [a] To be installed with the construction of a parking structure or transportation facility at the East Parking Area or the Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area in connection with the construction and prior to the operation of parking structures and/or a substantial increase in surface spaces or substantial change in operation of those spaces in the East Parking Area and/or the adjacent Parking Overlay.

5. Install traffic signal control at the intersection of Manchester Avenue / Clementine Street & Alro Way. [b] To be installed when signal warrants indicate it would be needed on the basis of an access analysis conducted for proposed development within the East Parking Area or Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area.

6. Provide in-lieu contribution and dedicate right-of-way adjacent to the Project Site on Ball Road and Haster Street for proposed Class II Bicycle Lanes on those streets.

Fee and dedication to be provided for each street prior to receipt of final Building and Zoning Inspection for cumulative development of at least 10,000 square feet on adjacent Disney property (northernmost portions of the Theme Park District for Ball Road, in the Southeast District for Haster Street).

7. Install traffic signal control at the existing driveway to the Southeast District on Haster Street south of Katella Avenue. [b] To be installed when signal warrants indicate it would be needed on the basis of an access analysis conducted for proposed development within the Southeast District or the Theme Park East Overlay.

8. Widen Katella Avenue to four westbound lanes along Disney's property adjacent to the Theme Park District from Disneyland Drive to approximately 800 feet west of Harbor Boulevard.

To be widened prior to receipt of final Building and Zoning Inspection for cumulative development of at least 10,000 square feet in the southwestern portion of the Theme Park District or development generating at least 50 net new public trips at the East Parking Area, the Parking Overlay north of the East Parking Area, the Southeast District, or the Theme Park East Overlay.

9. Widen Katella Avenue to four eastbound lanes along Disney's property adjacent to the Southeast District (from approximately 700 feet west of Clementine Street to approximately 400 feet east of Clementine Street).

To be widened prior to receipt of final Building and Zoning Inspection for cumulative development of at least 10,000 square feet in the Southeast District.

Notes:
[a] The Project would include at least one and up to three bridges between Manchester Avenue and Disney Way.[b] This action would be subject to a traffic signal warrant analysis. 121
Chapter 7
Project Construction
The DR EIR and ARSP SEIR noted that construction of The Disneyland Resort would impact City streets either due to construction traffic or temporary disruptions to roadway capacity due to adjacent construction activity. The DR EIR, therefore, required any construction activities that would result in disruption to traffic to prepare and implement traffic management plans. These include a Construction Traffic Management Plan to govern construction activity, a Trip Reduction Plan for construction crew vehicles, and a Traffic Management Plan to sequence and phase offsite roadway and infrastructure improvements.

Construction of the Project would occur in stages as market conditions indicate over a period of up to 40 years in accordance with a Development Agreement. For each stage of construction, Disney would prepare and submit the appropriate traffic management plans and would work with the City to implement them.
122
References
1991 Orange County Congestion Management Program, Orange County Transportation Authority, 1991.

The 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy, Southern California Association of Governments, April 2016.

The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, City of Anaheim, September 2012, as amended.

City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, City of Anaheim, 1996.

City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element, City of Anaheim, Revised June 2018.

City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for CEQA Analysis, City of Anaheim, June 2020.

CEQA Transportation Analysis for the DisneylandForward Project, Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc., August 2023.

The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, City of Anaheim, Adopted June 29, 1993, as amended.

Engineering Standard Detail No. 164-C, City Department of Public Works, 2008.

Final Environmental Impact Report for the Disneyland Resort EIR No. 311, Michael Brandman Associates, certified June 22, 1993, and Addenda.

Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340, Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, Anaheim, California, BonTerra Consulting, December 2012.

Master Plan of Arterial Highways, Orange County Transportation Authority, 2017, as amended.

Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, December 2018.

Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2017.

Appendix A
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan &
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
Project Design Features & Mitigation Measures

Disneyland Resort Specific Plan

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 0067 AS MODIFIED ON OCTOBER 8, 1996 (INCLUDING PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES) FOR

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
UPDATED FEBRUARY 4, 2022 TO REFLECT APPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIVALENCIES CEQA Action Environmental Impact Report No. 311 (Resolution No. 93R-107; EIR Addendum (Resolution No. 96R-176) Project Description General Plan Amendment No. 331 and Specific Plan No. 92-1 (Including Zoning and Development Standards, Design Guidelines and a Public Facilities Plan).

Applicant The Walt Disney Company, 500 South Buena Vista Street, Burbank, California, 92521.

Contact: Douglas M. Moreland, Disney Development Company.

Project Location The project site is located along the westerly side of Interstate 5 (I-5). Ball Road on the north and Katella Avenue on the south are the major east-west thoroughfares crossing the Specific Plan area. Harbor Boulevard is the main northsouth thoroughfare running through the Specific Plan area. I-5 abuts the northeastern edge of the project site.

Terms and Definitions 1. Applicant - The Walt Disney Company, its successors and assigns.

2. Property Owner/Developer – Any owner or developer of real property within The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area, including the C-R Overlay Area and District A.

3. Disneyland Resort – The Disneyland Resort, including a second gated theme park, modifications to the Disneyland Hotel, a new Disneyland Administration Building, new hotels, entertainment areas, internal transportation systems, public parking facilities in the Parking, Theme Park and Hotel Districts, and the South Parking Area in the Future Expansion District. None of the mitigation measures or project design features contained herein shall be required to be implemented prior to issuance of any permits for or construction of new structures, improvements, or other modifications within the existing Disneyland theme park.

4. Second Theme Park – A gated theme park planned south of the existing Disneyland theme park.

5. Future Expansion District – The Future Expansion District is a 24.7-acre south of Katella Avenue which is proposed primarily for development as the South Parking Area (the Future Expansion District includes a one-acre parcel which is governed by the C-R Overlay).

6. Project Design Features (PDFs) – Measures incorporated into The Disneyland Resort project by the applicant with the intent of minimizing potential environmental impacts. The project design features included in this Mitigation Monitoring Program will be implemented as mitigation measures.

7. Environmental Equivalent/Timing – Any Project Design Feature or Mitigation Measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City, which will have the same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed “environmental equivalent/timing” and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be borne by the applicant.

8. Responsibility for Monitoring – Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all departments listed for each mitigation measure.

9. Ongoing Mitigation Measures – The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this mitigation monitoring program will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer and/or applicant in January of each year stating how compliance with the subject measure(s) has been achieved. Mitigation Measures are referenced in parentheses by their section number as identified in the Draft EIR. Mitigation Measures and/or Project Design Features designated to occur on an ongoing basis are noted with an asterisk (*). When compliance with a mitigation measure/project design feature has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the mitigation measure will be deemed satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For mitigation measures/project design features that are to be monitored “Ongoing During Construction”, the annual letter will review those mitigation measures/project design features only while construction is occurring; monitoring will be discontinued after construction is complete. A final annual letter will be provided at the close of construction.

10. The City recognizes that the certain infrastructure improvements and service capabilities, as identified in this Mitigation Monitoring Program, will serve not only the applicant but also other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, The Anaheim Resort, and the service area, each of which should contribute in allocable share of the cost of these improvements. To implement this requirement as it applies to other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, The Anaheim Resort, and the service area, the City shall make appropriate arrangements with other public agencies, if any, to reimburse the applicant to the extent that its contributions for these improvements exceed the applicant’s allocable share of the cost. Such arrangements shall include one or more of the following: (1) creation of integrated financing districts; (2) entry into a reimbursement agreement with the applicant; (3) creation of appropriate community facilities districts, assessment districts and/or use of similar public financing districts and/or mechanisms; and (4) creation of such other mechanisms or districts as may be appropriate to provide for the reimbursement of these costs. The determination of the allocable share of improvement costs attributable to the applicant and other property owners/developers, and reimbursement amounts, shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such improvements and equipment and personnel among property owners/developers, including the applicant, in the Specific Plan area, The Anaheim Resort, or otherwise defined service area, as applicable, depending on the area served.

11. To the extent that this Mitigation Monitoring Program requires the applicant to submit plans for several phases simultaneously, it is understood that such later phase plans may be considered preliminary and may be subject to change. Such preliminary plans for the later phase will not be required to provide the level of detail required for the initial phase plans provided that more detailed plans will be submitted separately at a later time. Nevertheless, such preliminary plans for the later phase shall provide sufficient schematic or descriptive detail to ensure that plans submitted for said later phase shall comply with the provisions of this Mitigation Monitoring Program and shall be consistent with the provisions of the initial phase plans.

12. Timing – This is the point where a mitigation measure/project design feature must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure/project design feature must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Program will occur, as routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure design feature has been complied with. For example, if the timing is “to be shown on approved building plans” subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance.

13. Building Permit – For purposes of this Mitigation Monitoring Program, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building or structural expansion/modification of any existing building, but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions to an existing structure or building.

14. Note: Mitigation Measure No. 3.3-7 and Project Design Feature 3.3-16 (which were initially included in this Mitigation Monitoring Program) have been intentionally deleted and are no longer applicable.

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 1 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION

LAND USE-RELATED PLANS AND POLICIES
MM 3.1-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

The Planning Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City Departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed environmental equivalent.

MM 3.1-2 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
Building plans shall be submitted by the property owner/developer and will be reviewed for consistency with the Specific Plan.

Planning Department, Planning and Building Divisions
PDF 3.1-1 Prior to Approval of
Each Final Site Plan or Issuance of Each Building Permit, Whichever Occurs First The proposed project shall be implemented based on the guidelines and standards in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, which includes zoning and development standards, design guidelines, and a Public Facilities Plan. All development proposals within The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area must be consistent with The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and the City of Anaheim General Plan.

Planning Department, Planning Division

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
MM 3.2-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.2-2 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
For parking facilities associated with the Hotel and Parking Districts, the property owner/developer shall submit plans detailing the setbacks for the parking structures and landscaping plans which minimize compatibility impacts of the parking facilities on surrounding areas, consistent with Section 5.8 of the Specific Plan.

Planning Department, Planning Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 2 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.2-1 Prior to Approval of
Each Final Site Plan or Issuance of Each Building Permit, Whichever Occurs First Applicant shall submit documentation that project design features are in compliance with all building setbacks, height standards, landscaping requirements, and design guidelines as specified in Section 7.0 of Appendix B, The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan.

Planning Department, Planning Division

TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION
MM 3.3-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.3-2 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
Appropriate traffic signal assessment fees shall be paid by the property owner/developer to the City of Anaheim in amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit or credit given for City-authorized improvements.

Planning Department, Building Division; Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division MM 3.3-3A Prior to Approval of the
First Final Subdivision Map or Issuance of the First Building Permit (Other Than for Phase I), Whichever Occurs First; or Pursuant to a Mutually Agreed-Upon Schedule for Dedication and Public Improvements The property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate rights-ofway (as indicated in the General Plan Circulation Element, as amended per GPA No. 331) for the following arterial highway/street half-sections (where the property owner/developer owns only one side of the ultimate right-ofway) or full-sections (where the property owner/developer owns both sides of the ultimate right-of-way) on or adjacent to parcels under its ownership to the City of Anaheim:
a. Katella Avenue (to ultimate 8-lane facility) b. Walnut Street c. West Street/Disneyland Drive d. Ball Road e. Harbor Boulevard f, Freedman Way g. Clementine Street h. Manchester Avenue i. Cerritos Avenue j. Haster Street Planning Department, Planning Division; Public Works Department, Development Services Division; City Attorney’s Office

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 3 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.3-3B Within 120 Days of
Acquiring Properties Adjacent to Arterial Highways/Street Intersection Half Sections included in (3.3- 3A) If, after the initial dedications, any additional parcels are acquired by the applicant adjacent to the arterial highway/street intersection half-sections included in (MM 3.3- 3A), the applicant shall notify the City in writing of said acquisition and the ultimate rights-of-way for said properties shall be irrevocably offered for dedication to the City of Anaheim.

Planning Department, Planning Division; Public Works Department, Development Services Division; City Attorney's Office MM 3.3-4 Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit for the Disneyland Administration Building; to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections for the Disneyland Administration Building The applicant shall provide a cast guard entrance 150' 400’ south of Ball Road at the entrance to the Disneyland Administration Building with three inbound and a minimum of two outbound lanes to minimize queuing onto Ball Road. (Note: Environmental Equivalent measure approved 8/30/94 which included the provision of a gate guard entrance located 400’ south of the intersection of Ball Road/Disneyland Administration Building driveway).

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Completed
MM 3.3-5 Prior to approval of the
First Grading Plan for each phase of the Disneyland Resort A phasing plan shall be submitted for review and approval to the appropriate City Engineer in Anaheim and/or Garden Grove (for improvements within Garden Grove) demonstrating how the improvements shown in Table 3.3- 16, as approved by the City Engineer, will be constructed. [SEE TABLE 3.3-16] Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 4 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.3-6 In accordance with the
timing set forth in the phasing plan
Excluding the Disney Administration Building, relocation of the SCE transmission lines and demolition, but including the South Parking Area, the applicant shall mitigate (through constructing or paying the actual total costs for consultant/contractor services for preliminary and final engineering, soils analysis, right-of-way acquisition, demolition, relocation, construction and inspection, and other related expenses) the traffic impacts of the Disneyland Resort by implementing the improvements identified in Table 3.3-16, as approved by the City Engineer, in accordance with the phasing plan approved by the City Engineer. If the City of Anaheim adopts a traffic impact fee, as discussed in Section 3.3.1.3 of the EIR, funds collected under this program with nexus to these improvements may be used to reimburse the applicant for the portion of the baseline improvements (as identified in Table 3.3-16) which exceed the project share of the improvements. Improvements otherwise funded by public sources prior to approval of the Final Site Plan for each phase will be deleted from project participation.

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division MM 3.3-8 In accordance with the
Approved Phasing Plan
The following improvements are required:
• Add eastbound and westbound dual left-turn lanes
and an eastbound right-turn lane to the Clementine Street/Katella Avenue intersection, with a storage length of 200 feet accommodating six lanes on Katella Avenue with a 24-foot wide median tapering to 4 feet median nose through the left turn pockets. • Add a southbound right-turn pocket to the rightturn-in- only entrance to the South Parking Area on Haster Street, with a storage length of 150 feet; and, provide west half-width of ultimate six lane arterial south of Katella Avenue to the southern property line of the South Parking Area.

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 5 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.3-9 In accordance with the
Approved Phasing Plan for the Disneyland Administration Building The following improvements shall be required:
 Add a westbound right-turn lane at Anaheim
Boulevard/Ball Road.
 Restripe existing left-turn lane westbound to provide a minimum of 150 feet of dual lane storage or a minimum of 250 feet of single-lane storage at Ball Road/Disneyland Administration Building driveway.  Provide an eastbound right-turn pocket with 250 feet
of storage at Ball Road/Disneyland Administration building driveway. (Note: Environmental equivalent measure approved on August 30, 1994 (Administration Building MMP No. 0067) which required that the eastbound rightturn pocket at Ball Road/Disneyland Administration Building driveway shall maintain existing storage and be designed as a free right-turn. Applicant to irrevocably offer for dedication the right-of-way adjacent to right-turn pocket for full buildout of Ball Road).  Redesign the Disneyland Administration Building
entrance driveway to provide three inbound and a minimum of two outbound lanes, with its own entrance gate located a minimum of 150 400 feet south of the intersection at Ball Road/Disneyland Administration Building driveway. (Note: Environmental equivalent measure approved on August 30, 1994 (Administration Building MMP No. 0067) for this item which required the provision of the gate guard entrance to be located 400 feet south of the intersection of Ball Road/Disneyland Administration Building driveway).

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Completed

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 6 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.3-1 Prior to demolition of
the existing Disneyland parking lot, replacement parking for the existing Disneyland Theme Park parking spaces removed will be constructed; Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park, the West Parking Area will be Constructed Access Improvements and Public Parking Facilities Included in Project Design (Exhibits 3.2-2 and 3.2-3) Public Parking Facilities. New public parking facilities will be constructed at opposite sides of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area to receive traffic from the 1-5. At Phase II, Code required parking will be provided. At buildout of Phase III, a minimum of 24,500 guest and cast parking spaces will be provided. The West Parking Area will be oriented to receive southbound 1-5 traffic, and the parking facilities in the southern areas of the Theme Park and Hotel Districts and/or East Parking Area will be oriented to receive northbound 1-5 traffic.

Public Works Department, Design Division
PDF 3.3-2 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections for each the East and West Parking Structures/Facilities Improved Access. Access roads leading up to the
parking facilities shall be sized to accommodate traffic at peak hours, thereby substantially reducing the likelihood of backups onto City streets and freeway ramps. Guest vehicles will enter and exit the West Parking Area via the proposed extension of West Street/Disneyland Drive. Cast access will enter and exit either at West Street/Disneyland Drive or via a single access on Cerritos Avenue with right-turn in and left-turn out only. No cast or guest access or egress will occur from Walnut Street.

Public Works Department, Design Division
PDF 3.3-3 Prior to Issuance of
each Building Permit; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections for both the East and West Parking Structures Speed Parking. Building plans shall show direct ramps
to each level of the East and West Parking Area facilities to minimize internal circulation within the garages and accommodate the project's "speed parking" operation.

Planning Department, Building Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 7 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.3-4 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspection for Each Parking Structure and/or Facility Conveyance Systems. In addition to an extensive
network of landscaped pedestrian thoroughfares, conveyance systems will transport Disneyland Resort guests around the project. Guest transportation systems will move guests from the parking facilities to the Theme Park District. The monorail/guest transportation systems shall move guests from the Hotel District to the Theme Park District. Future connections may also be provided to the Future Expansion District.

Public Works Department, Design Division
PDF 3.3-5 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park for Phase II; and if pursued, to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections for the East Public Parking Structure or Other Accessible Location in Phase III.

Theme Park Drop-Off Area. To provide access to the
attractions in the Specific Plan area to people staying outside of The Disneyland Resort area, a bus and shuttle drop-off area will be located adjacent to Harbor Boulevard north of Freedman Way in Phase II as shown on Exhibit 4.4.2a of the Specific Plan; or, in Phase III, the facility may be located adjacent or internal to the East Public Parking Structure, or other accessible location in the Theme Park or Hotel Districts. The types of vehicles served at this facility may include public and private passenger shuttles and buses.

Public Works Department, Design Division
PDF 3.3-6 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to the First Final Building and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park
Roadway Improvements Included in Project Design I-5 - West Street/Disneyland Drive Southbound Mixed Flow Offramp A mixed-flow offramp currently proposed as part of the 1-5 widening project is planned from southbound I-5 to West Street/Disneyland Drive to replace the existing Ball Road offramp. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved on 4/12/99 to change the timing of this measure as Disney’s California Adventure theme park would not be open to the public generating vehicular traffic until the I-5 West Street/Disneyland Drive southbound mixed flow offramp opened. This would be monitored and verified by the City prior to Final Public Works Department, Design Division
Completed

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 8 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
Building and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park.) PDF 3.3-7 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park West Street/Disneyland Drive/Ball Road Overcrossing
(Exhibits 3.2-3 and 3.2-4) To reduce congestion for vehicles entering the West Parking Area from I-5, an overcrossing is planned at West Street/Disneyland Drive and Ball Road. The intersection of West Street and Ball Road shall be constructed with a two- lane flyover over Ball Road as a project design feature. The overcrossing would take southbound I-5 traffic exiting at West Street/Disneyland Drive over Ball Road, and then allow convenient access to the entrance of the parking facility. The design of the Ball Road and West Street/Disneyland Drive intersection, shall provide a north leg (southbound Disneyland Drive) of two through lanes, one shared left-turn/through lane, and one left-turn lane of three through lanes and two left turn lanes; a south leg (northbound Disneyland Drive) of one right-turn lane, one shared right-turn/through lane, one shared leftturn/through lane, and one left-turn lane of one right turn lane, two through lanes and one left turn lane; an east leg (westbound Ball Road) of three through lanes and two left turn lanes; and, a west leg (eastbound Ball Road) of one right turn lane, three through lanes and two left turn lanes. This overcrossing may be one-way inbound in the morning, two-way during the afternoon, then one-way outbound during the outbound peak. Access and egress points will be provided both north and south of Ball Road. Both the HOV ramp and the mixed-use off ramp at 1-5 and West Street/Disneyland Drive would have access to the overcrossing. A full intersection at West Street/Disneyland Drive will still be provided at grade. When the overcrossing is one-way, counter-flow movements can be made along West Street/Disneyland Drive.

Public Works Department, City Engineer Design Division
Completed

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 9 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
(Note: Environmental equivalent approved on 7/27/20 to reflect the Ball Road/Disneyland Drive intersection lane configuration that was implemented by 2001 (and still in place on 7/27/20 and to change the Monitoring Responsibility to the Public Works Department, City Engineer.).

PDF 3.3-8 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park West Street/Disneyland Drive Intersections and Turn
Pockets To facilitate traffic flow along West Street/Disneyland Drive between Katella Avenue and Ball Road, signalized intersections will be provided at major hotel entrances. Appropriate turn pockets including double left-turn lanes and right-turn only lanes will also be provided as needed to maintain acceptable service levels. West Street/Disneyland Drive itself will have two travel lanes in each direction.

Public Works Department, Design Division
PDF 3.3-9 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; to be Implemented in accordance with the approved Phasing Plan Freedman Way Widening
The addition of the northbound HOV offramp at Freedman Way and the realignment of the southbound onramp will require the widening of Freedman Way between Harbor Boulevard and Clementine Street; Clementine Street to 1-5. Three through lanes, where possible, and necessary turn lanes in each direction will be provided.

Public Works Department, Design Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 10 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.3-10 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park Speed/Capacity Restrictions on Walnut Street
Between Cerritos Avenue and Ball Road, Walnut Street will be improved adjacent to the strawberry field in accordance with the City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element. To discourage any increase in traffic on Walnut Street, the capacity of the road will be restrained, from Katella Avenue to Ball Road. Possible methods include narrowing the street entrances at Katella Avenue and Ball Road and replacing the existing signal with a stop sign at the existing intersection of Walnut Street and Cerritos Avenue. This and other options will be evaluated, and a plan to maintain the current character of Walnut Street will be developed.

Public Works Department, Design Division
PDF 3.3-11 To be Shown on
Street Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park Cerritos Avenue Realignment
With the development of the Hotel District, Cerritos Avenue between Walnut Street and West Street/Disneyland Drive will be moved up to approximately 1,100 feet to the north and will be renamed. The new roadway will be two lanes wide and will be designed to discourage access from or onto Walnut Street. Southbound left turns will not be allowed at the Walnut Street/Cerritos Avenue intersection. Westbound Cerritos Avenue left turns at Walnut Street will not be allowed.

Public Works Department, Design Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 11 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.3-12 To be Shown on
Street Improvement Plans; to be Implemented by Caltrans in conjunction with the I5 Widening Project. (The I-5 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Offramps are part of Caltrans' I-5 Widening Project and will be completed independent of The Disneyland Resort Project. The HOV ramps were not assumed in the analysis of traffic impacts of the Disneyland Resort and are not required as a condition of the opening or operation of the Disneyland Resort.) I-5-West Street/Disneyland Drive Southbound HOV Offramp Caltrans' I-5 Widening Project includes a new HOV offramp from southbound I-5 to West Street/Disneyland Drive. This ramp would be built at the same time as the I-5 Widening Project. The ramp will bring high occupancy vehicles (HOVs) conveniently from the HOV lane in the median of I-5 to the West Parking Area.

Caltrans; Public Works Department, Design Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 12 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.3-13 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; to be Implemented by Caltrans in conjunction with the I-5 Widening Project. (The 1-5 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Offramps are part of Caltrans' 1-5 Widening Project and will be completed independent of The Disneyland Resort Project. The HOV ramps were not assumed in the analysis of traffic impacts of the Disneyland Resort and are not required as a condition of the opening or operation of the Disneyland Resort.) 1-5/Freedman Way Northbound HOV Offramp
Caltrans' 1-5 Widening Project includes a proposed HOV offramp connecting the northbound HOV lanes on 1-5 to Freedman Way and an undercrossing of Anaheim Boulevard to Freedman Way. This ramp will carry a substantial number of vehicles to the East Parking Area and remove them from Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue. This ramp (shown in Exhibit 3.2-2 of Volume I of the EIR) will allow northbound 1-5 traffic to access the parking facility conveniently from the freeway and also provide access for other vehicles to Harbor Boulevard. It will improve the level of service of the section of Katella Avenue crossing 1-5, as well as the intersections of Katella Avenue with Anaheim Boulevard, Haster Street, Clementine Street, and Harbor Boulevard. The ramp is discussed in detail in Appendix C-1, Volume III.

Caltrans; Public Works Department, Design Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 13 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.3-14 To be Shown on
Street Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park Intersection Improvements Included in Project Design
The following intersection improvements, which are assumed in the analysis of project traffic, will be implemented unless otherwise indicated by the year 2001 (0pening of Second Theme Park) as part of the project design that will enhance the overall performance of the surrounding circulation system:
• Redesign and reconstruct the intersection of Ball
Road/West Street/Disneyland Drive to include an overcrossing. • Redesign the Harbor Boulevard/Freedman Way
intersection by accommodating three lanes eastbound and three lanes westbound through the intersection and adding double left turn lane southbound. In Phase III, the entrance to the surface parking lot may be removed. • At the intersection of Anaheim Boulevard and
Freedman Way, add a third through lane eastbound and westbound and a second left-turn lane eastbound, or equivalent improvements as defined by Caltrans during the final geometric design of the I-5 interchange. • At the intersection of Clementine Street and Freedman Way, add the following improvements or equivalent improvements as defined by Caltrans during the final geometric design of the I-5 interchange:
- third through lanes eastbound and westbound- left-turn lanes eastbound and westbound- second through lanes northbound and southbound- left-turn lane southbound- remove right-tum lane northbound • Reconfigure the Walnut Street/Cerritos Avenue
intersection.
• Reconfigure the West Street/Disneyland Drive/Cerritos Avenue intersection to satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Public Works Department, Design Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 14 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.3-15 Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park; and, on-going during project operation Transportation Demand Management Program The need to minimize cast vehicle trips to reduce congestion and improve air quality, consistent with the goals of both the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and with the Regional Mobility Plan of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), is recognized. The Disneyland Resort will implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all cast, which will strive to achieve an average vehicle ridership (AVR) goal of 1.5 persons per vehicle and, an average length of out-of-area guest stay of 1.72 days, by 2001. At this point in project development, it is not possible to predict precisely which programs and activities would be most successful for the Disneyland Resort in meeting these goals. In addition, applicant will review annually with the City any changes to the TDM Program and the Program's effectiveness toward achieving a 1.5 AVR. In consultation with the SCAQMD, the City of Anaheim and other agencies, and after analyzing the effectiveness of these items, The Walt Disney Company will select specific programs for implementation.

Southern California Association of Governments; South Coast Air Quality Management District; Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 15 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
Objectives of the TDM program are:
• Increase ridesharing and use of alternative
transportation modes by guests.
• Meet the cast 1.5 AVR target.• Provide a menu of commute alternatives for the Disneyland Resort cast, to reduce project-generated trips. • Provide transportation "linkages" to existing and
future transportation modes (other than singleoccupant vehicle travel) for both the Disneyland Resort cast and guests.

Implementation strategies and elements of the TDM program for cast and guest trips are described below.

Cast
Making a commitment to commute management and trip reduction will become an integral part of the new-hire training. A menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both, existing and future cast commute options would be examined, including, but not limited to, the following:
• Onsite Service. Onsite services, such as the food,
retail, and other services may be provided to the cast. • Ridesharing. A computer listing of all cast
members may be developed for the purpose of providing a "matching" of members with other cast members who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare to the Disneyland Resort.

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 16 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
• Vanpooling. A computer listing of all cast members
may be developed for the purpose of matching numbers of cast who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool to the Disneyland Resort. • Transit Pass. Southern California Rapid Transit
District and Orange County Transportation Authority (including commuter rail) passes may be promoted through financial assistance and onsite sales to encourage cast to use the various transit and bus services to the Disneyland Resort from throughout the region. • Commuter Bus. As commuter "express" bus
service expands throughout the region, passes for use on these lines may be provided for cast members who choose to use this service. Financial incentives will be provided. • Shuttle Service. A computer listing of all cast
members living in proximity to the Disneyland Resort may be generated, and a local shuttle program will be offered to encourage cast members to travel to work by means other than the automobile. • Bicycling. A Disneyland Resort Bicycling Program
may be developed to offer a bicycling alternative to cast members. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers will be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area would be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options. • Rental Car Fleet. A "fleet vehicle" program may be
developed to provide cast members who travel to work by means other than an automobile with access to automobiles in case of emergency, medical appointments, etc. This service would help cast members use alternative modes of transportation by ensuring that they would be able to have personal transportation in the event of special circumstances.

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 17 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
 Guaranteed Ride Home Program. The program
may provide cast members who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift. In essence, this program addresses the concerns of the cast member who rideshares and might be stranded without a vehicle in the event of an emergency.  Housing Coordinator and Referral Program and
Local Hiring Efforts. Continue to provide referral service to facilitate employees in finding housing and actively recruit prospective employees residing within 30-minute commute shed.  Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip.

Design an incentives program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips.  Work Schedule
 Staggered Shifts. The Disneyland Resort cast
may work different hours throughout the daily hours of park operation. A thorough review of cast shifts would be undertaken to provide the potential for cast shifts during nonpeak travel times, thus lessening peak hour congestion.  Compressed Work Week. The Disneyland
Resort may review the possibility of developing a "compressed work week" program, which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts, as an option for cast members. This program would help eliminate certain trips on certain days that would otherwise be generated daily by the Disneyland Resort Cast.

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 18 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
 Telecommuting. The Disneyland Resort
employs a variety of cast in different positions, cast members include clerical, office support, and administrative members. The Disneyland Resort may explore the possibility of a "telecommuting" program that would link some of these cast members to The Disneyland Resort via electronic means (e.g., computer with modem). This would help to eliminate certain trips that would otherwise be generated by a cast member who would otherwise physically need to be at the Disneyland Resort.  Work Environment/Facility Management
 Parking Management. The Disneyland Resort
may develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than single-occupant auto to travel to work.  Management Staff. The existing Disneyland
theme park transportation management staff may be expanded onsite to accommodate new employees and to explore relationships with adjacent employers to determine whether joint efforts can lead to greater reductions in VMT by project employees.  Amenities. Transit systems, transit shelters,
bicycle storage areas, and other amenities may be provided with efficient parking management for cast and guests.  Access. Preferential access to high occupancy
vehicles and shuttles may be provided.
 Delivery Management. Schedule deliveries in
nonpeak traffic congestion hours to the extent reasonably practicable.

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 19 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
 Financial Incentives In addition to the above items, certain financial incentives will be integrated into The Disneyland Resort TDM program, such as:
 Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or
Public Transit. Currently, federal law provides tax-free status for up to $60 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit (including commuter rail and/or express bus pools).  Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Cast
members may be offered financial incentives for bicycling to work; they would be provided with secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers.  Special “Premium" for the Participation and
Promotion of Trip Reduction. Tickets/passes to project theme parks and/or vacations could be offered to employees who recruit other cast members for vanpool, carpool, or other Disney trip reduction programs.  Delivery Management. Schedule deliveries in
non- peak traffic congestion hours to the extent reasonably practicable.  Guests
Even though visitors are estimated to average nearly four persons per vehicle, additional programs and incentives could and will be provided to encourage even more guest use of ridesharing, transit, and other modes of travel to and from !he Disneyland Resort. The applicant is currently developing a list of potential programs and is working with the City of Anaheim and OCTA on the provision of convenient linkages to other modes of transportation. Marketing materials for the Disneyland Resort will describe it as an "auto-free" zone with a range of transportation amenities where cars are not needed.

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 20 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.3-17 Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park
Transportation Management Association
Other measures to achieve trip reductions and other TDM program objectives will be explored, including the formation of a Disneyland Resort Transportation Management Association (TMA), or an Anaheim Resort Area TMA. To increase the likelihood of success of the TDM program, cooperation among other groups and businesses who either have existing TDM programs or have a need for TDM programming could be networked with cast participants. By expanding the number of participants in the various programs, more benefit in trip reduction is likely to be achieved. The TMA would be responsible for matching cast and guest commute services; marketing/promoting ridesharing alternatives (i.e., vanpooling, bicycling, etc.); and providing a "fair share" payment of local TDM programs provided through the TMA. (PDF 3.3-17) Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Completed

AIR QUALITY
MM 3.4-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.4-2 Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspection Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
The property owner/developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for all permitted new and modified stationary sources. Copies of permits shall be given to the Planning Department. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved on 7/1/98 to change the timing of the measure.) South Coast Air Quality Management District; Planning Department, Planning Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 21 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.4-3* Ongoing During
Operation of the Disneyland Resort
The applicant shall implement the following measures to reduce emissions:

1. To the extent practicable, schedule goods movements
for off-peak traffic hours.

2. Use clean fuel for attraction rides and other uses, as practicable.

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division

3.4-4 Prior to Issuance of
the First Building Permit for the Second Theme Park Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park The applicant shall submit a site and operations plan for this facility showing the location and configuration of the on-site cast financial and dining services in conformance with the Specific Plan. The applicant shall provide cast financial and dining services within the Theme Park District and Hotel District to accommodate cast members.

Planning Department, Planning Division
MM 3.4-5 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
The property owner/developer shall submit evidence that low emission paints and coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings in compliance with AQMD regulations. This information shall be denoted on the project plans and specifications.

South Coast Air Quality Management District; Planning Department, Building Division MM 3.4-6 Prior to Issuance of the
First Building Permit for the Future Expansion District, Excluding the South Parking Area; and, Ongoing During Project Operation The following will be achieved: (1) the 1.5 AVR target for all cast and (2) the average length of the out-of-area guest stay of 1.72 days, or a demonstration that the SCAG VMT reduction targets have been met through other means.

South Coast Air Quality Management District; Southern California Association of Governments; Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 22 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.4-2* Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park; and Ongoing During Project Operation The project has been designed to reduce dependence on the private automobile, which will reduce and avoid many of the traffic-related emissions associated with the existing Disneyland theme park, as well as those normally associated with hotels and day-use only special event activities. Guests will be encouraged to park their cars and leave them for the duration of their visits, thus eliminating the trips to restaurants and sightseeing, or entertainment attractions normally associated with vacation stays. Marketing efforts in Southern California will promote the Disneyland Resort as a mini-vacation site for Southland residents.

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division PDF 3.4-3 Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park
A wide range of entertainment, lodging, retail and restaurant attractions will be located within the project area and will be linked by an electrically powered monorail system, pedestrian ways/guest transportation system to transport visitors from parking facilities to the Disneyland Resort, and/or pedestrian bridges, walkways and promenades. Convenient walkway access within the Hotel District and adjacent uses, such as the City of Anaheim Convention Center, will also facilitate pedestrian trips by non-project guests who will remain within the project area rather than use automobiles to travel to restaurants and entertainment outside of the area.

Planning Department, Planning Division
PDF 3.4-4 In Accordance with
Transportation and Circulation Mitigation Measures
The Disneyland Resort traffic will be accommodated, and existing traffic conditions and circulation patterns will be improved through implementation of the identified transportation and parking features, including parking facilities, monorail and pedestrian way/guest transportation systems and convenient access to parking facilities from the freeway.

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division PDF 3.4-5* Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits for Each of the East and West Public Parking Structures ;Ongoing During Project Operation All public day-use parking facilities, not including hotel, hotel accessory uses or cast parking facilities, will have a crew of cast members, based on parking predictions, on each lot or facility level, to assist speed parking procedures. In addition, the East and West public parking structures will incorporate the following Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 23 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
design features on each facility level, to assist speed parking procedures:

1. Signage designed to enhance smooth traffic flows
and reduce traffic flows on each facility level.

2. Speed ramps which will take cars directly to the
level that has available spaces, thus eliminating circulation movement and time involved with hunting for a space. The speed parking striping and procedures currently used at the Disneyland theme park parking lot will be adapted to use within the parking structures and will be designed to safely park 60 cars per minute. (Refer to Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards, in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan.)

3. Ceiling clearances and lateral clearances, an open
well design, and enhanced lighting levels will eliminate the enclosed feeling of a standard garage, which tends to slow drivers.

PDF 3.4-6 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
Project design will incorporate the following energysaving features. This energy savings will also contribute to reduced emissions:

1. Improved thermal integrity of structures and
reduced thermal load through use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors.

2. Efficient heating and other appliances. 3. Incorporation of appropriate passive solar design. 4. Proper sealing of buildings. 5. Use of drought-resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy used in pumping and transporting water. (Note: Environmental Equivalent prior to 3/98 which deleted notation for drought resistant landscaping as the Utilities Department, Water and Electric Services

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 24 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
requirement is addressed in MM 3.10.6-2 and monitoring this aspect of the feature would result in a redundant effort).

PDF 3.4-7 Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park
There will be a special drop-off area on Harbor Boulevard north of Freedman Way, or internal or adjacent to the East Public Parking Structure, or other accessible location, for shuttle buses to help encourage use of buses by area visitors.

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division PDF 3.4-8* Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park; Ongoing During Project Operation The applicant will implement a comprehensive and aggressive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all project employees.

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division NOISE
MM 3.5-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.5-2* Ongoing During Project
Operation of the Second Theme Park
The applicant shall obtain (on an annual basis) a permit for use of fireworks.

Fire Department Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division MM 3.5-3 Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit for Amphitheater
Plans submitted for the location of the amphitheater will document that the facility is no closer than 2,000 feet from the nearest existing residence. The design and orientation of the amphitheater will be reviewed by a certified acoustical engineer; the applicant shall submit a report, for review and approval by the City, to ensure that noise from the amphitheater does not exceed the noise levels established by the City of Anaheim Sound Pressure Level Ordinance.

Planning Department, Building Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 25 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.5-4 Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspection for the Amphitheater. Within 9 Months of Commencement of Amphitheater Operations A Noise Monitoring Program prepared by a certified acoustical engineer shall be submitted for review and approval. The applicant shall submit the results of the Noise Monitoring Program conducted by a certified acoustical engineer to ensure that there are no violations of the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance from amphitheater operations outside the Disneyland Resort. If noise in excess of the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance is detected, the applicant shall modify operations within three days to bring the Amphitheater into conformance with the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance.

Planning Department, Planning and Building Divisions
MM 3.5-5 Prior to Approval of
Each Final Site Plan; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections For hotels within the 70 CNEL contour from West Street/Disneyland Drive, the property owner/developer shall submit a noise study prepared by a certified acoustical engineer identifying whether noise attenuation is required, and defining any attenuation measures and specific performance criteria, if any such measures are required to comply with the Uniform Building Code. Ultimate noise attenuation requirements, if any, shall depend on the final locations of such buildings and noise-sensitive room/uses inside the buildings.

Planning Department, Building Division
MM 3.5-6 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
For construction of the public parking facilities, South Parking Area facility, and any hotel parking facilities adjacent to residential areas, plans shall document that the driving surfaces shall be a textured surface to minimize tire squeal noise.

Planning Department, Building Division
MM 3.5-7* Ongoing During Project
Operations of the Second Theme Park
Engine noise from sweeping equipment used in the public parking facilities, South Parking Area facilities and any hotel parking facilities adjacent to residential areas shall be muffled.

Planning Department, Building Division
MM 3.5-8 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections For structures that are adjacent to residential areas, the applicant shall ensure that all mechanical ventilation units are shown on plans and installed in compliance with the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance.

Planning Department, Building Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 26 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.5-1* Ongoing During Project
Operations
Lower noise-producing fireworks displays will be used at the Second Theme Park to minimize noise from 11:00 p.m. fireworks shows to meet the noise levels in the City of Anaheim Sound Pressure Level Ordinance.

Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division
PDF 3.5-2 Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit for the West Public Parking Facility; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park Noise from the west public parking facility adjacent to Walnut Street will be reduced by the provision of convenient access to the parking facility, sound attenuation devices (louvers and walls), the use of textured deck surfaces to reduce tire squealing, and tiering the parking facility in the West Parking Area above the third floor to provide greater distance to the receptors. Noise from the West Public Parking Facility adjacent to the Conestoga Hotel will be reduced by the provision of sound attenuation louvers in the openings on the north side of the structure adjacent to the Conestoga Resort.

Planning Department, Building Division
PDF 3.5-3 Submittal of Noise
Study Prior to Issuance of Southwest Parking Area Building Permit; and Sound Wall Construction Prior to the Commencement of Operation of the Southwest Parking Area The applicant shall construct a 9-14 feet in height sound wall along Walnut Street next to the Southwest Parking Area. The actual height of the wall will be determined by a noise study submitted with the parking facility construction plans.

Planning Department, Building Division

EARTH RESOURCES - GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY
MM 3.6-1 Prior to Approval of
Each Grading Plan
The property owner/developer shall submit a thorough soils and geological report for the area to be graded, based on proposed grading and prepared by an engineering geologist and geotechnical engineer. The report shall comply with Title 17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.

Public Works Department, Development Services Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 27 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.6-2 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
The property owner/developer shall submit for review and approval detailed foundation design information for the subject buildings, prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations by a geotechnical engineer.

Planning Department, Building Division
MM 3.6-3 Prior to Issuance of
Each Foundation Permit
The property owner/developer shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer for review and approval which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations to determine if soft layers are present immediately beneath the footing site and to ensure that compressibility does not underlie the footing.

Planning Department, Building Division
MM 3.6-4 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
The property owner/developer shall submit plans showing that the proposed structure has been analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the most recent seismic standards in the Uniform Building Code adopted by the City of Anaheim.

Planning Department, Building Division
MM 3.6-5* Ongoing During Project
Operations
The property owner/developer shall coordinate earthquake training with the Fire Department for hotel staff and cast members.

Fire Department
MM 3.6-6 Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspection Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
For hotels, the property owner/developer shall submit an earthquake emergency response plan for review and approval. That plan shall require posted notices in all hotel rooms on earthquake safety procedures. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved on 1/15/99 to change the timing of the measure.) Fire Department

GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE HYDROLOGY
MM 3.7-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 28 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.7-2 Prior to Approval of
Phase II Grading Plan; to be Implemented in Accordance with the Phasing Plan; and, prior to approval of Phase III Grading Plan; to be Implemented in Accordance with the Phasing Plan.

The property owner/developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff Management Plan (MDRMP) for review and approval. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following items: a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and including the 100-year storm. b. A delineation of the improvements to be
implemented for control of project-generated drainage and runoff. c. Detailed assessment of existing water quality,
potential water quality impacts, and a description of proposed measures to maintain water quality to the extent required by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and its regulations, including the following:

1. Incorporation of structural and nonstructural Citycontrolled Best Management Practices (BMPs).

BMPs shall, to the extent permitted by law, include, but are not limited to, containment of masonry and paint wastes on the construction site; proper disposal of vehicle fuel and maintenance wastes; disposal of trash and debris; prohibiting water wash down of paved areas (both during and after construction unless allowed by the NPDES permit); and education/training for construction workers on these practices. Engineering details, maintenance procedures, and funding responsibilities of these BMPs shall also be described.

2. Incorporation of measures to comply with
applicable actions to be identified by the RWQCB in conformance with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) statewide water quality control plan for inland surface waters, adopted April 11, 1991.

Orange County Environmental Management Agency; Regional Water Quality Control Board; Caltrans; Public Works Department, Development Services Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 29 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION

3. Description of a water quality monitoring program to monitor water quality during and subsequent to construction and to evaluate the effectiveness of BMPs. The water quality monitoring program shall identify: (1) the person/agency responsible for implementing the program, (2) sources of pollutants in runoff (e.g., nuisance •flows from development areas, irrigation flows), (3) specific types of pollutants expected in runoff that will be monitored (e.g., total suspended solids, phosphorous, lead), (4) water quality sampling stations that are representative of runoff from the sources identified above, (5) sampling program methodology, including devices to be used and frequency and duration of sampling, (6) method for evaluating data collected from a sampling program, including threshold standards for determining effectiveness of BMPs, and (7) additional measures, if necessary, to increase the effectiveness of the BMPs to the threshold standards identified in C(l) above.

MM 3.7-3 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit Exclusive of the Theme Parks including the Retail/Entertainment Component, Prior to Issuance of Each Building Permit (for non Setback Realm Areas); Prior to approval of Final Site Plan (for Setback Realm Areas) For the West Parking Facility: prior to approval of initial building permits for interim condition of a The property owner/developer shall submit landscaping and irrigation plans and an Irrigation Management Program to integrate and phase the installation of streetscape landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. This landscape plan shall include a maintenance program to control the use of fertilizers and pesticides, and an irrigation system designed to minimize surface runoff and overwatering. Additionally:
a. The landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape architect shall submit plans in accordance with Anaheim's Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance and Guidelines including:

1. Project Information. 2. Maximum Applied Water Use expressed as annual totals.

3. Soil management report or specifications.

Planning and Building Department, Planning Division Public Utilities, Water Services Community Services Department, Parks Division (public right-of-way landscape plans)

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 30 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
portion of the West Parking Area (for the final landscape plans for the Walnut Street Setback area and for the area adjacent to the Walnut Street soundwall in the private realm); and prior to approval of building permits for the ultimate condition of the West Parking Area (for the final landscape plans for West Street/ Disneyland Drive setback landscape, Cerritos Ave. setback landscape, landscaping at entrance to hotels and landscaping interior to hotel and RD&E parking)

4. Landscape design plan. 5. Irrigation design plan. 6. Grading design plan. b. The Irrigation Management Program shall specify
methods for monitoring the irrigation system and shall be designed by an irrigation engineer (plans to be submitted in accordance with the Specific Plan). The system shall ensure that irrigation rates do not exceed the infiltration of local soils and that the application of fertilizers and pesticides do not exceed appropriate levels of frequencies. c. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be
developed to be consistent with the provisions of the Specific Plan, which require that the Estimated Applied Water Use (EAWU) to be less than the Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) the maximum annual water allowance for the project (excluding theme parks) not exceed 80 percent of the mean annual evapotranspiration, or that the landscape irrigation system include water-conserving features such as low-flow irrigation heads, automatic irrigation scheduling equipment, flow sensing controls, rain sensors, soil moisture sensors, and other water- conserving equipment. In addition, all irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with reclaimed water, if it should become available. (Note: Environmental equivalents were approved for this measure as follows: Prior to 8/97, environmental equivalent approved which clarifies the timing relative to the Setback Realm Areas and non-Setback Realm Areas and its inapplicability to the theme parks including the retail/entertainment component; deleted the reference to the intended purpose of the plan to integrate and phase the installation of streetscape landscaping with the proposed Utilities Department, Water Services; Planning Department, Planning Division (Specific Plan consistency) Utilities Department, Electric Services, Administration, Resource Efficiency Section (Landscape Irrigation plans, Irrigation Management Program and conservation measures)

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 31 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
construction schedule in that the Specific Plan requires the approval of Final Site Plans for the Setback Realm Areas which will be submitted on a street-by-street basis rather than on an individual project component basis. It should be noted that this measure will apply to and be monitored with the ultimate landscaping only and not with any interim landscaping condition. On 10/8/97, environmental equivalent approved to clarify the timing for the West Parking Facility as the SP-4 portion of the West Parking Area will first be developed to accommodate surface parking in an interim condition only. Implementation of this measure for all of the West Parking Area would require substantial portions of the landscaping to be removed in order to implement plans for the ultimate condition of the West Parking Area. On 7/26/18, environmental equivalent approved to add new language as standard required information to be included as part of the Landscape Plans submittal. In addition, new language calls for consistency with Estimated Applied Water Use (EAWU) and Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA). With the exception of the Planning Department, other departments were deleted from the “Responsible for Monitoring” Section of this Measure, as they are not required to review/monitor.) MM 3.7-4* Ongoing During
Operation of the Disneyland Resort
The applicant shall provide for the following: cleaning of all paved areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim including,' but not limited to, private streets and parking lots on not less than a monthly basis. Using water to clean streets, parking Jots, and other areas shall be allowed on a periodic basis if allowed in the applicant's NPDES permit. Nightly washdown shall be allowed in the theme parks and, where advisable to maintain safe and sanitary working conditions, the back-of-house area, if allowed in the applicant's and City's NPDES permit. Flushing debris, residue, and sediment down the storm drains shall conform to the applicant's NPDES requirements. Applicant agrees that material deposited in City storm drains shall not be in violation of the City's NPDES permit.

Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 32 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.7-5 Prior to Each Final
Building and Zoning Inspection (for nonSetback Realm
Areas); Prior to Acceptance by City Engineer (for Setback Realm Areas) The property owner/developer shall submit a Certificate of Substantial Completion, as described in the Specific Plan, which establishes that the landscape irrigation systems have been installed as specified in the approved landscaping and irrigation plans. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved prior to 3/98 which clarifies the timing relative to the Setback Realm Areas and non-Setback Realm Areas. It should be noted that this measure will apply to and be monitored with the ultimate landscaping only and not with any interim landscaping condition).

Planning Department, Planning Division
PDF 3.7-1 To be Installed With
Project Water Mains; to be Connected if Reclaimed Water Becomes Available For the West Parking Facility: prior to approval of initial building permits for interim condition of a portion of the West Parking Area (for the final landscape plans for the Walnut Street Setback area and for the area adjacent to the Walnut Street soundwall in the private realm); and prior to approval of building permits for the ultimate condition of the West Parking Area (for the final landscape plans for West Street/ Disneyland Drive setback landscape, Cerritos Ave. setback To reduce the project's demand on potable water, the property owner/developer shall install water lines onsite so that reclaimed water may be used for landscape irrigation and other purposes, if and when it becomes available. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved on 10/8/97 to clarify the timing for the West Parking Facility as the SP-4 portion of the West Parking Area will first be developed to accommodate surface parking in an interim condition only. Implementation of this measure for all of the West Parking Area would require substantial portions of the landscaping to be removed in order to implement plans for the ultimate condition of the West Parking Area.) Utilities Department, Water Services

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 33 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
landscape, landscaping at entrance to hotels and landscaping interior to hotel and RD&E parking)

CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS
MM 3.8-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.8-2* Ongoing During
Grading Operations
The property owner/developer shall implement standard practices from all applicable codes and ordinances to prevent erosion.

Public Works Department, Development Services Division
MM 3.8-3 Prior to Approval of
Each Grading Plan Prior to Issuance of Each Grading Permit The property owner/developer shall obtain required NPDES construction storm permits from the State Water Resources Control Board, if applicable. Copies of the Notice of Intent or permits, as applicable, shall be submitted to the City Engineer. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved prior to 3/98 to change the timing for submittal of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to a more appropriate point in the process.) State Water Resources Control Board; Public Works Department, Development Services Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 34 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.8-4* Ongoing During
Construction
The following measures will be followed by the property owner/developer to reduce air quality impacts:
a. Normal wetting procedures or other dust palliative
measures shall be followed during earth-moving operations to minimize fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. b. Roadways adjacent to the project shall be swept and
cleared of any spilled export material at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust; haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of material exported from the project site occur. c. Where practicable, heavy duty construction
equipment shall be kept onsite when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the project site. d. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or
debris shall either be covered prior to entering public streets or shall comply with the vehicle freeboard requirements of Section 23114 of the California Vehicle Code for both public and private roads. This California Vehicle Code section stipulates that the load, where it contacts the sides, front and back of the cargo container area, remain six inches from the upper edge of the container area, and that the load does not extend, at its peak, above any part of the upper edge of the cargo container area.. e. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems
necessary to water and maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed. f. Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces
to 15 miles per hour or less.

Planning Department, Building Division; Public Works Department, Development Services Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 35 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
g. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds
(as instantaneous gust) exceed 25 miles per hour and during second stage smog alerts. h. The project will comply with the SCAQMD Rule
402, which states that no dust impacts offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible emissions from construction. i. Use low emission mobile construction equipment
(e.g., tractors, scrapers, dozers, etc.) where practicable. j. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators rather than temporary power generators, where practicable. k. Maintain construction equipment engines by
keeping them properly tuned.
l. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent
practicable.
(Note: Environmental equivalent approved on 1/19/99. California Vehicle Code Section 23114 states that: “Vehicles transporting loads of aggregate materials shall not be required to cover their loads if the load, where it contacts the sides, front, and back of the cargo container area, remains six inches from the upper edge of the container area, and if the load does not extend, at its peak, above any part of the upper edge of the cargo container area.” The South Coast Air Quality Management District, in its Rule 403 Implementation Handbook, states that adherence to the abovereferenced Code Section is equivalent to covering haul vehicles as a means of controlling fugitive dust. The environmental equivalent text for this mitigation measures reflects these requirements.)

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 36 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.8-5 Prior to Approval
Issuance of Each Grading Plan Permit(for Import/ Export Plan) and Prior to Issuance of Demolition Permit (for Demolition Plan) Other than for the Disneyland Administration Building or the relocation of the SCE transmission lines, the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export Plans. The plans shall include identification of offsite locations for material export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The applicant shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all can be reused on the project site. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved prior to 3/98 which changed the timing for the submittal of the Import/Export Plan to a more appropriate point in the process.) Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division MM 3.8-6* Ongoing During
Construction
The property owner/developer shall implement the following to limit emissions from architectural coatings and asphalt usage:
a. Use nonsolvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate.
b. Use solvent-based coatings, where they are
necessary, in ways that minimize solvent emissions.
c. Encourage use of high-solid or water-based coatings.

Air Quality Management District; Planning Department, Building Division MM 3.8-7* Ongoing During
Demolition and Construction
Construction noise shall be limited by the property owner/developer to 60 dBA along the property boundaries of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area before 7:00 a.m. and after 7:00 p.m. as governed by Chapter 6.7, Sound Pressure Levels, of the Anaheim Municipal Code. (Note: Planning Department changed the responsible Division to the Code Enforcement Division.) Planning Department, Building
Division and Code Enforcement Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 37 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.8-8 Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit
For the parking facility in the West Parking Area or any parking structure or facilities in the Hotel District and the South Parking Area, an 8-foot perimeter or portable construction barrier along streets adjacent to construction areas, to be in place during construction, shall be provided to minimize noise impacts. (Note: Planning Department changed the responsible Division to the Code Enforcement Division.) Planning Department, Building Division Code
Enforcement Division
MM 3.8-9* Ongoing During
Construction
The property owner/developer shall ensure that all internal combustion engines on construction equipment are fitted with properly maintained mufflers. (Note: Planning Department changed the responsible Division to the Code Enforcement Division.) Planning Department, Building Division Code
Enforcement Division
MM 3.8-10* Ongoing During
Demolition and Construction
In the event that hazardous waste, including asbestos, is discovered during site preparation or construction, the property owner/developer shall ensure that the identified hazardous waste and/or hazardous material are handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5), according to the requirements of the California Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22, and the Uniform Fire Code, Article 87.

Air Quality Management District for asbestos disposal; Orange County Health Department for hazardous waste and material disposal; Fire Department, Environmental Protection Section for hazardous materials/wastes from underground storage tanks.

MM 3.8-11* Ongoing During
Construction
If Anaheim Police Department or Anaheim TMC personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fairshare basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services.

Police Department; Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division; City Attorney's Office

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 38 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.8-12* Prior to Issuance of the
First Demolition, Grading or Building Permit for Phase II, Whichever Occurs First Excluding permits for relocation of the SCE transmission lines, or for demolition related to relocation of the SCE transmission lines as specified in the Phasing Plan, the applicant will establish an onsite public information office (which is conveniently and accessibly located) where construction scheduling and phasing information will be available to the public. The public information office shall be open during construction hours. A telephone "hotline" will be provided to the community to allow members of the public to call the office with questions or comments during business hours. At least one liaison officer will be staffed at the office. The liaison officer shall be available to answer questions from the public and shall coordinate with the City of Anaheim, other public agencies, and major developers in the area regarding the coordination of construction activities and infrastructure improvements. The City shall be provided with a monthly summary of the calls received and follow-up actions.

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division PDF 3.8-1 Prior to Issuance of the
First Each Building Permit for the Disneyland Resort or, any Other Timing Specifically Provided in this Measure Excluding the relocation of SCE Transmission lines or the Disneyland Administration Building, the applicant shall submit a Traffic Mitigation and Construction Phasing and Control Plan. To the extent needed, as determined by the Public Works Department, the following project design features (PDF 3.8-1 - 3.8-8) require the applicant to submit at different times the plans for construction of both Phase II and Phase III development. The Traffic Mitigation and Construction Phasing and Control Plan shall identify the following:
a. A Construction Staging Area Plan showing the
location and size of the construction staging area. The Plan shall also show how the staging area will be screened from view in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. (Note from 1997 DRSP Mitigation Monitoring Guide: Screening will be reviewed in compliance with the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan in as much as the City of Anaheim Municipal Code contains no specific requirements for screening.) Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division; Planning Department, Planning Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 39 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
(Note: Environmental equivalent approved prior to 3/98 which allows the Construction Staging Area Plan to be prepared for each project component to ensure the Plan includes sufficient detail to address said component).

PDF 3.8-2 Prior to Approval of
Each Grading Plan or
Issuance of Each Demolition or Building Permits, Whichever Occurs First b. A Construction Barrier Plan showing the location
and types of barriers to be in place during grading and construction. Said plan shall provide for all construction areas to be screened from view in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code and shall include provision for the type and height of the barriers to be placed along all construction perimeters prior to the commencement of demolition, site preparation or grading, whichever occurs first. (Note from 1997 DRSP Mitigation Monitoring Guide: Screening will be reviewed in compliance with the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan in as much as the City of Anaheim Municipal Code contains no specific requirements for screening.) (Note: Environmental equivalency approved on 3/13/97 to clarify the plan shall be submitted prior to approval of each grading plan or issuance of each demolition or building permit).

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division; Planning Department, Planning Division PDF 3.8-3 Prior to Approval of
Each Grading Plan or Issuance of EachDemolition or Building Permit, Whichever Occurs First; Implemented During Grading Site Preparation and Construction
c. A Truck Route Plan identifying truck routes along
arterials, avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible and in compliance with the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. The Plan shall show conformance with the external noise limits for construction between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. The Plan shall also prohibit construction traffic on residential streets where improvements are not planned and shall provide measures to ensure that truck drivers are directed away from residential streets and travel on approved routes only. Measures to assist in guiding truck movement on the arterial roadway system include, but Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division; Planning Department, Planning Division Code Enforcement Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 40 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
are not limited to, provision of truck route maps to truck drivers and placement of flagpersons and construction signage at appropriate locations. The Truck Route Plan shall provide for monitoring of street conditions and potential repairing and/or repaving by property owner/developer after completion of construction as required by the City Engineer. (Note: Environmental equivalency approved on 3/13/97 to clarify the plan shall be submitted prior to approval of each grading plan or issuance of each demolition or building permit. The Planning Department also clarified Code Enforcement was the responsible Division.) PDF 3.8-4 Prior to Approval of
Each Grading Plan or
Issuance of Each Demolition or Building Permit, Whichever Occurs First; Implemented During Grading and Construction d. A Construction Traffic Management Plan which
includes mechanisms to reduce construction-related traffic congestion which shall be implemented during grading and construction, including, but not limited to, the following:

1. Configure construction parking to minimize onsite
and offsite traffic interference.

2. Minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes.3. Provide flagpersons to guide traffic, as determined in the plan.
(Note: Environmental equivalency approved on 3/13/97 to clarify the plan shall be submitted prior to approval of each grading plan or issuance of each demolition or building permit. The Planning Department also clarified Traffic was the responsible Division).

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division; Planning Department, Planning Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 41 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.8-5 Prior to Approval of
the First Each
Grading Plan for Phase II and III Southwest Parking Facility e. A Trip Reduction Plan (excluding the demolition for or relocation of the SCE transmission lines) for construction crew vehicles shall be prepared to reduce potential vehicle trips on the road and identify parking locations for construction employees and equipment. (Notes: Environmental equivalent approved on 4/1/97 which allows the Trip Reduction Plan to be prepared for each project component to ensure the Plan includes sufficient detail to address said component).

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division; Planning Department, Planning Division PDF 3.8-6 Prior to Issuance of the
First Approval of each Building Permit for Each Phase
f. A Traffic Management Plan for phasing of roadway
improvements, specifying the sequencing of construction to do the following:

1. Coordinate scheduling with other planned
construction in the area, including the I-5 widening project.

2. Coordinate scheduling with other infrastructure
improvements to allow them to be facilitated efficiently during roadway improvements, such as sewer, storm drain, and water line improvements.

3. Outline procedures for any required traffic
detours during construction, including provision of tour bus stops.

4. Phase each roadway improvement to allow
access to all existing businesses/residential areas. In some instances this will require laneby-lane renovation, temporary bypass roads, or traffic reroutes.

5. Employ vertical shoring as often as possible.

This will minimize the amount of road surface that will be disturbed at a given location.

6. Sequence the construction of each roadway
improvement to minimize disruption to residents and businesses.

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 42 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION

7. Establish offsite parking and staging areas,
where practical and possible, to minimize the impact to existing level of service on adjacent roadways. These offsite parking and staging areas will allow a dispersion of traffic flow to noncritical areas and will encourage bussing of construction workers from the offsite areas to the construction sites.

8. Identify how the project improvement
construction schedules and haul routes will be coordinated with other areawide improvements. The applicant shall coordinate with the Convention Center and area hotels to ensure continued operations of these facilities, as well as the continued operation of the existing Disneyland theme park and Disneyland Hotel. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved on 7/24/97 to integrate the requirements of PDF 3.8-7 into the Traffic Management Plan. It also changes the timing for the measure as development of the South Parking Facility constitutes an early minor component of the Disneyland Resort and, therefore does not warrant preparation and implementation of a project-wide Traffic Management Plan, rather, it provides for the preparation of a Traffic Management Plan for the South Parking Facility only at this point. The need for a project-wide Traffic Management Plan will be assessed with each Grading Plan and will be required when determined warranted by the City.)

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 43 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.8-7 Combined with PDF 3.8-6
Prior to Issuance of the
First Building Permit
g. Infrastructure Coordination Plan showing how
the project improvement construction schedules and haul routes will be coordinated with other areawide improvements. The applicant shall coordinate with the Convention Center and area hotels to ensure continued operations of these facilities, as well as the continued operation of the existing Disneyland theme park and Disneyland Hotel. (Note: Environmental equivalent for PDF 3.8-6 approved on 7/24/97 which combined the monitoring requirement for this feature with PDF 3.8-6 in that infrastructure coordination is a component of the Traffic Management Plan and separate monitoring of this feature would result in a redundant effort.) Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation Division
PDF 3.8-8 Prior to Approval of the
First Each Grading Plan for Phase II of the Disneyland Resort and III Southwest Parking Facility h. An Infrastructure Improvement Master Phasing
Plan containing (a) infrastructure layout, (b) sizing,
including supporting calculations, and (c) infrastructure construction phasing. (Note: The following Environmental Equivalencies were approved: On 3/21/97, environmental equivalent approved to change the timing of this measure as development of the Southwest Parking Lot constitutes an early minor component of the Disneyland Resort and, therefore, does not warrant preparation and implementation of a project-wide infrastructure Improvement Master Phasing Plan, rather it provides for the preparation of a Infrastructure Improvement Master Plan for the Southwest Parking Lot only at that date. The need for a project-wide Infrastructure Improvement Master Phasing Plan would be assessed with each Grading Plan and would be required when determined warranted by the City.

Public Works Department, Development Services Division Traffic and Transportation Division; Planning Department, Planning Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 44 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
Prior to 3/98, an environment equivalent was approved to eliminate the requirement for sizing, including supporting calculations, as this information is required with the actual improvement plans and is not addressed as part of a phasing plan.) PDF 3.8-9 Ongoing During Project
Construction
The applicant shall submit a quarterly update report showing construction activities for the upcoming quarter which shall include traffic mitigation and control planning and construction scheduling.

Public Works Department; Planning Department, Planning Division PDF 3.8-10* Ongoing During
Construction
To decrease solid waste resulting from the construction phases, asphalt and concrete which is demolished as a part of project demolition and construction may be crushed and reused on the project site.

Public Works Department, Development Services Division
PDF 3.8-11 Prior to Approval of
Each Grading Plan
The applicant shall show how the project will be in compliance with the Traffic Mitigation and Construction Phasing and Control Plan.

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division; Planning Department, Planning Division

EMPLOYMENT, POPULATION, AND HOUSING
MM 3.9-1* Varies The applicant shall implement the project design feature included herein or its environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 45 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.9-1* Ongoing During Project
Operations
The existing Disneyland theme park and Disneyland Hotel special employment programs such as summer employment for teachers and educational programs offering local high schools students jobs will continue. The Walt Disney Company will also aggressively recruit workers who are already a part of the resident work force in the region. Implementation of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan will further efforts in offering employment opportunities at various socioeconomic levels.

Planning Department, Planning Division

PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITIES - FIRE
MM 3.10.1-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.10.1-2 Prior to
Commencement of Structural Framing on Each Parcel or Lot Onsite fire hydrants shall be installed and charged, as required, by the property owner/developer.

Fire Department
MM 3.10.1-3 Prior to Approval of
Each Grading Plan
The property owner/developer shall submit an emergency
fire access plan to ensure that service to the site is in accordance with Fire Department service requirements.

Fire Department
MM 3.10.1-4 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
The property owner/developer shall submit a Construction Fire Protection Plan which shall include detailed design plans for accessibility of emergency fire equipment, fire hydrant location, and any other construction features required by the Fire Marshal. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for securing facilities acceptable to the Fire Department and hydrants shall be operational with required fire flow.

Fire Department
MM 3.10.1-5 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit; to be Implemented Prior to Each Final Building and Zoning Inspection Plans shall indicate that all buildings, exclusive of parking structures, shall have sprinklers installed by property owner/developer.

Fire Department

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 46 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.10.1-6 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
Plans shall be submitted to ensure that development is in accordance with the City of Anaheim Fire Department Standards, including:
a. Overhead clearance shall not be less than 14 feet
for the full width of access roads.
b. Bridges and underground structures to be used
for Fire Department access shall be designed to support Fire Department vehicles weighing 75,000 pounds. c. All underground tunnels shall have sprinklers.

Water supplies are required at the entrances. Standpipes shall also be provided when determined to be necessary by the Fire Department. d. Adequate off-site public fire hydrants contiguous
to the Specific Plan area and onsite private fire hydrants shall be provided by the property owner/developer. The precise number, types, and locations of the hydrants shall be determined during building permit review. Hydrants are to be a maximum of 400 feet apart. e. A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall
remain in the water system. Flow rates for public parking facilities shall be set at 1,000 to 1,500 gpm.

Fire Department
MM 3.10.1-7 Prior to Issuance of the
First Building Permit in Phase II
The property owner/developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Anaheim to pay or cause to be paid its fair share of the funding for one additional fire inspector to maintain adequate levels of service of ongoing fire inspection of the Project and in the Anaheim Resort.

Fire Department; City Attorney's Office

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 47 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.10.1-8 Prior to Issuance of the
First Building Permit for Phase II of the Disneyland Resort, Excluding Permits for Demolition or the Relocation of the Existing SCE Transmission Lines The EIR identifies the following equipment in connection with the Project, other development within the C-R Overlay and District A of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area, and cumulative development in the Anaheim Resort:
• A vehicle equipped with specialty tools and equipment to enable the Fire Department to provide heavy search and rescue response capability.
• A medical triage vehicle/trailer, equipped with
sufficient trauma dressings, medical supplies, stretchers, etc., to handle 1 ,000 injured persons, and an appropriate storage facility.
• One additional fire truck company.• One additional Paramedic company.• Modification to existing fire stations to accommodate the additional fire units.

To implement this requirement as it applies to the applicant, the applicant shall provide or cause to be provided funding for the following equipment:
• One fire truck company; • One paramedic company; and • Modifications to existing fire stations to accommodate the fire truck company and the paramedic company.

The applicant shall not be required to contribute to the purchase of the other equipment identified in the Final EIRbecause the applicant has or will provide its own emergency response equipment and personnel.

Fire Department; City Attorney's Office

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 48 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
The City recognizes that these improvements will serve not only the applicant but also other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, and the service area, each of which should contribute its allocable share of the cost of the improvements. To implement this requirement as it applies to other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, and the service area, the City shall, and shall make appropriate arrangements with other public agencies, if any, to reimburse the applicant to the extent that its contributions for these improvements exceed the applicant's allocable share of the cost. Such arrangements shall include one or more of the following: (1) creation of integrated financing districts; (2) entry into a reimbursement agreement with the applicant; (3) creation of appropriate community facilities districts, assessment districts, and/or the use of similar public financing districts and/or mechanisms; and (4) creation of such other mechanisms or districts as may be appropriate to provide for the reimbursement of these costs. The determination of the allocable share of improvement costs attributable to the applicant and other property owners/developers, and reimbursement amounts, shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such equipment and personnel among property owners/developers, including the applicant, in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, or the otherwise defined service area, as applicable, depending on the area served. To implement this mitigation measure, the City has adopted the Fire Protection Facilities and Paramedic Services Impact Fee Program. Compliance with this Program by the property owner/developer (per Ordinance No. 5496 and Resolution No. 95R-73 dated May 16, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this Mitigation Measure, or the City may enter into alternative financing arrangements with the applicant.

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 49 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.10.1-9 Prior to Approval of
Street Improvement Plans
The water supply system shall be designed by the property owner/developer to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage for the proposed land use and fire protection in accordance with Fire Department requirements. (3.10.1-9) Fire Department; Public Utilities Department, Water Services MM 3.10.1-10 Prior to Each Final
Building and Zoning Inspections, emergency telephone service numbers shall be posted for at least one telephone in each facility (for nonoccupied facilities) and emergency telephone service numbers shall be posted at each telephone that is deemed appropriate by the Fire Department in each facility (for occupied facilities); prior to Opening Day, emergency telephone service numbers will be posted within The Disneyland Resort for all telephones that are deemed appropriate by the Fire Department.

The property owner/developer shall place emergency telephone service numbers in prominent locations as approved by the Fire Department. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved on 2/7/00 to change the timing for this measure as the majority of The Disneyland Resort will not be open to the public nor occupied by employees of Disneyland prior to Opening Day, and therefore will not require the posting of emergency telephone service numbers at more than one telephone per facility. Prior to Opening Day, after which time all facilities will be open to the public and occupied by employees, all emergency telephone numbers will be posted, in accordance with the requirements of the Fire Department.) Fire Department
PDF 3.10.1-1 *
Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park; Ongoing During Project Operation The existing services and capabilities of the Disneyland Fire Department shall be extended within the Disneyland Resort. Existing services include preconstruction checks, preinvestigation of fires and alarms, preplanning for fires and evacuations, fire prevention program activities, and monitoring of pyrotechnics and special effects.

Fire Department

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 50 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION

PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITIES - POLICE
MM 3.10.2-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.10.2-2* Ongoing During
Operation of the Disneyland Resort
The operator of the public parking facilities shall provide an adequate staff of private security officers for patrol and surveillance of the facilities.

Police Department
MM 3.10.2-3 Prior to the Issuance of
the First Building Permit for Phase II of the Disneyland Resort (excluding the Relocation of the SCE Transmission Lines) The property owner/developer shall enter into an agreement with the City of Anaheim to pay or cause to be paid its fair share of the funding for police personnel and equipment necessary to meet the service needs of the Anaheim Resort.

Police Department, City Attorney
MM 3.10.2-4 Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park
The applicant shall provide space within The Disneyland Security Office, to support the Anaheim Police Department to the satisfaction of the Police Department, based on the following criteria:
 During the design phase of the security area, a police representative shall be kept informed of the plans for the security area.  All facilities shall be within The Disneyland Resort
Security Office on a shared basis.
 Separate holding rooms for adult and juvenile
offenders shall be provided for the use of the Disneyland Security Department.  Additional private interview rooms shall be made
available for the shared use of the Anaheim Police Department and the Disneyland Security Department, including adequate areas for onsite storage needs and a common area for computers.

Police Department

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 51 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.10.2-5 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit for Parking Structures
The Police Department shall review the safety measures incorporated into the building plans for the parking structures within the Specific P an area to be submitted by the property owner/developer. The security measures shall include the following or other substitute security measures as may be approved by the Police Department:
 For the West and East Public Parking Structure, and
the Southwest Parking Facility, closed circuit television surveillance and recording equipment shall be provided.  For the hotel parking structures, closed circuit
television surveillance and recording equipment shall be provided.  For the Disneyland Administration Building and the
South Parking Area (south of Katella Avenue and west of Haster Street), guarded entrance and exit gates shall be provided.

Police Department
MM 3.10.2-6* Ongoing During
Operation of the Disneyland Resort
The applicant shall continue to provide anti-gang and substance abuse educational programs which are currently provided for park security cast members.

Police Department
PDF 3.10.2-1* Ongoing During
Operations
The Disneyland Security Department shall be expanded to provide equivalent levels of service to the entire Disneyland Resort. These services will include initial response, investigation, and report writing. Entry points to the theme parks will be patrolled by the Disneyland Security Department.

Police Department
PDF 3.10.2-2 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit for Each Parking Facility; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections In the West and East Public Parking Structures and in the hotel parking structures, closed circuit television monitoring and recording or other adequate security measures will be used extensively.

Police Department

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 52 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.10.2-3* Ongoing During Project
Operation
The applicant shall continue to provide and expand its Court Liaison program to meet the needs of the Disneyland Resort.

Police Department
PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITIES – SOLID WASTE
MM 3.10.3-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.10.3-2 For the Second
Theme Park, prior to Opening Day, except where solid waste recycling facilities are required for operation of facility prior to Opening Day (in which case solid waste recycling facilities will be provided prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections); and for the Remainder of The Disneyland Resort, Prior to Final Zoning and Building Inspections Excluding the relocation of SCE transmission lines, the Disneyland Administration Building and demolition, the property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Director of Maintenance for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, as implemented by the City of Anaheim, the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management Plan, and the City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plan, administered by the Department of Maintenance. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved on 12/7/99 to change the timing for this mitigation measure as the majority of Disney’s California Adventure will not be open to the public nor occupied by employees of Disneyland prior to Opening Day, and therefore, will not be generating solid waste. With respect to the remainder of The Disneyland Resort, solid waste management facilities will be provided as part of the Certificate of Occupancy process, after which time facilities will be occupied, and therefore, generating solid waste. Mitigation measure also references “Director of Maintenance”. This has been changed to Director of Public Works, inasmuch as City Maintenance functions are now overseen by the Public Works Department. Additionally, the Department of Maintenance reference in the mitigation measure has been changed to Department of Public Works, Streets and Sanitation Division).

Maintenance Department
Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 53 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.10.3-3 Prior to Final Zoning
and Building Inspection; to be Implemented During Operation of the Theme Parks A solid waste management plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the applicant for the Disneyland Resort theme parks to ensure that the project plans comply with AB 939, as administered by the City of Anaheim, and the County’s and City’s Integrated Waste Management Plans. Waste management mitigation measures that shall be taken to reduce solid waste generation shall include:
a. Detailing the locations and design of back-of-house
recycling facilities.
b. Complying with all Federal, State, and City
regulations for hazardous material disposal.
c. Continuing participation in the City of Anaheim's
voluntary "Recycle Anaheim" program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City.

In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989 (AB 939), the applicant shall implement numerous solid waste reduction programs at the Disneyland Resort, including:
• Facilitating paper recycling by providing chutes or
convenient locations for sorting and recycling bins.
• Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially from retail areas) by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and baling. • Facilitating glass recycling (especially from
restaurants) by providing adequate space for sorting and storing. • Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable
materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and the number of trips required for collection. • Prohibition of curbside pick-up within the Disneyland Resort.

Maintenance Department; Fire Department, Environmental Protection Section (for hazardous material disposal)

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 54 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.10.3-1 Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park; and continuing on an Ongoing Basis During Project Operation The existing solid waste recycling and waste minimization practices at the Disneyland theme park shall be expanded as feasible to serve the Disneyland Resort. Existing practices include:
• Usage of recycled paper products for stationery,
letterhead, and packaging.
• Recovery of materials such as aluminum and
cardboard.
• Collection of office paper for recycling. • Collection of polystyrene (foam) cups for recycling. • Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery.

Maintenance Department

PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITIES - PARKS
MM 3.10.4-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the Mitigation Monitoring Program process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.10.4-2 Prior to Issuance of the
First Building Permit for Phase II
The applicant shall enter into an agreement to pay the cost of providing night lighting to two existing ballfields at one or more existing City community parks complete with support amenities, including parking, security lighting, restrooms, spectator seating, and drinking fountains. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department that delineates the conditions under which payment for improvements will be provided.

Community Services Department, Parks Division; City Attorney's Office PDF 3.10.4-1 Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park
Substantial area within the Disneyland Resort has been designed to encourage utilization by pedestrians in a parklike setting linking key areas of the project. The pedestrian amenities will include landscaped pedestrian walkways linking West Street/Disneyland Drive to Harbor Boulevard; and a new entry plaza for Disneyland and the Second Theme Park where the guest transportation system will drop off guests from the parking facilities and hotels.

Planning Department, Planning Division; Public Works Department, Design Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 55 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.10.4-2 Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park
The applicant will provide an eating area, outside the paid gates, easily accessible to park guests, within the Theme Park District for those who bring their own food. Design features will include a 50-table layout with comparable spacing to other theme park eating areas. Drinking fountains, security, landscaping, lighting, vending machines, and nearby restrooms/locker facilities will be provided.

Community Services Department, Parks Division
PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITIES -ꞏSCHOOLS
MM 3.10.5-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.10.5-2 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
The property owner/developer shall provide proof that school impact fees have been paid consistent with State statute.

Planning Department, Building Division
PDF3.10.5-1 Ongoing During Project
Operations
The existing Disneyland theme park has developed and/or has engaged in a series of educational programs in cooperation with the local community and regional agencies and organizations, designed to enhance and complement the educational opportunities and experiences for the youth. The 10 educational programs that currently exist are indicated below (see Section 3.10.5, Schools, for detailed information regarding these programs):

1. The Disneyland Creativity Challenge Awards Program 2. Orange County Young Listeners Concerts 3. Junior Achievement (JA) 4. Work Exposure Day at Disneyland 5. Disney Magic Music Days 6. Job Search Strategy Class 7. "Free From Drugs" Program 8. Job Training Opportunities 9. School Support Programs 10. CIF Champion Celebration The applicant will continue these programs and/or substitute similar programs of equal importance.

Planning Department, Planning Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 56 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION

PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITIES - WATER
MM 3.10.6-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.10.6-2 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit or Approval of Each Landscape Plan, Whichever Occurs First; to be Implemented Prior to Final Zoning and Building Inspections; and, Continuing on an Ongoing Basis During Project Operation With the exception of the West Parking Area, Prior to Issuance of Each Building Permit (for non-Setback Realm Areas); Prior to approval of Final Site Plan (for Setback Realm Areas); to be Implemented Prior to Final Zoning and Building Inspections (for non-Setback Realm Areas) and Prior to Acceptance by the City Engineer (for Setback Realm Areas); and Continuing on an Ongoing Basis During Project Operation Among the water conservation measures to be shown on plans and implemented by the property owner/developer (to the extent feasible within the Theme Park District) within the Specific Plan area include the following:
• Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system. • Use of waterway re-circulation systems. • Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and urinals.
• Use of self-closing valves on drinking fountains. • Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown when it becomes available.
• Continuation of the existing cooling tower
recirculation system.
• Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip
irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors. • Low-flow shower heads in hotels. • Water-efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other water-using appliances.
• Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when
evaporation rates are lowest.
• Provide information to the public in conspicuous
places regarding water conservation.
• Use of water-conserving landscape plant materials
wherever feasible.

Utilities Department, Resource Efficiency Section; Community Services Department, Parks Division; Planning Department, Building Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 57 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
West Parking Area: Prior to approval of initial building permits for interim condition of a portion of the West Parking Area (for the final landscape plans for the Walnut Street Setback area and for the area adjacent to the Walnut Street soundwall in the private realm); and prior to approval of building permits for the ultimate condition of the West Parking Area (for the final landscape plans for West Street/ Disneyland Drive setback landscape, Cerritos Ave. setback landscape, landscaping of entrance to hotels and landscaping interior to hotel and RD&E parking). • Use of vacuum and other equipment to reduce the
use of water for washdown of exterior areas.
(Note: Environmental equivalents were approved for this measure as follows: Prior to 10/8/97, environmental equivalent approved to clarify the timing relative to the Setback Realm Areas and non-Setback Realm Areas. It should be noted that this measure will apply to and be monitored with the ultimate landscaping only and not with any interim landscaping condition. On 10/8/97, environmental equivalent approved to change the timing for the West Parking Area as the SP-4 portion of the West Parking Area will first be developed to accommodate surface parking in an interim condition only. Implementation of this measure for all of the West Parking Area would require substantial portions of the landscaping to be removed in order to implement plans for the ultimate condition of the West Parking Area. On 7/26/18, environmental equivalent approved which, with the exception of the Planning Department, removed other departments from the “Responsible for Monitoring” Section of this measure as they are not required to review/monitor. It also removed the following language: “(to the extent feasible within the Theme Park District)”.) MM 3.10.6-3 Prior to Each Final
Zoning and Building Inspection
The property owner/developer shall submit a certified water audit for landscape irrigation systems except for areas within the Theme Parks.

Utilities Department, Resource Efficiency Section

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 58 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.10.6-4 Prior to Issuance of
the First Building Permit for the Disneyland Administration Building; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections for the Disneyland Administration Building The existing 12-inch water main between Ball Road and the southeast corner of the Disneyland Administration Building site will be replaced by the applicant with a new 16-inch diameter main to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department.

Utilities Department, Water Services
Completed
MM 3.10.6-5 Prior to Issuance of the
First Building Permit for Phase II, Excluding Permits for the Demolition or Relocation of the Existing SCE Transmission Lines For construction in the back-of-house area, excluding the Disneyland Administration Building, the existing 12 and 10-inch water mains located between the southeast corner of the Disneyland Administration Building site and Harbor Boulevard north of Manchester Avenue will be replaced with a new 16-inch water main to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department. Note: Implementation of the water improvement required in Condition of Approval #72, which requires a new 16” water main to be constructed in Manchester Avenue/Midway Drive between the Harbor/Manchester intersection and the Anaheim Boulevard/Midway Drive intersection, has been determined as environmentally equivalent to the adopted mitigation measure. (Note: On 2/27/97, environmental equivalent approved to add a note to clarify this measure.) Utilities Department, Water Services; City Attorney's Office MM 3.10.6-6
Prior to Issuance of the First Building Permit for Phase II, Excluding Permits for Demolition or the Relocation of the Existing SCE Transmission Lines; to be Implemented in Accordance with the The applicant shall submit for review and approval an engineering report and phasing plan demonstrating the incorporation of the following water system improvements into The Disneyland Resort. The applicant shall construct or cause to be constructed the following improvements:
a. The existing 8-inch water main in Clementine
Street from Katella Avenue to Freedman Way shall be replaced by a 20-inch water main.

Utilities Department, Water Services; City Attorney's Office Completed

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 59 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
Approved Phasing Plan
b. The existing 10-inch water main in Freedman Way
from Clementine Street to Harbor Boulevard shall be replaced by a 20-inch water main. c. The existing 10-inch water main in Harbor
Boulevard from Katella Avenue to Freedman Way shall be replaced by a 20-inch water main. d. The 12-inch water main in Katella Avenue from
Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street shall be replaced by a 20-inch water main. e. The existing 10-inch water main in Harbor
Boulevard from Freedman Way to Harbor Boulevard north of Manchester Avenue shall be replaced by a 16-inch water main.

The City recognizes that these improvements will serve not only the applicant but also other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, the, Anaheim Resort and the service area, each of which should contribute its allocable share of the cost of these improvements. To implement this requirement as it applies to other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, and the service area, the City shall, and shall make appropriate arrangements with other public agencies, if any, to reimburse the applicant to the extent that its contributions for these improvements exceed the applicant's allocable share of the cost. Such arrangements shall include one or more of the following: (1) creation of integrated financing districts; (2) entry into a reimbursement agreement with the applicant; (3) creation of appropriate community facilities districts, assessment districts, and/or use of similar public financing districts and/or mechanisms; and (4) creation of other such mechanisms or districts as may be appropriate to provide for the reimbursement of these costs. The determination of the allocable share of improvement costs attributable to the applicant and other property owners/developers, and reimbursement amounts, shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such improvements among property owners/developers, including the applicant, in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, or otherwise

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 60 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
defined service area, as applicable, depending on the area served. To implement this mitigation measure, the City has adopted the Anaheim Resort Water Facilities Fee Program (Rule 15E of the Water Rates, Rules and Regulations). Compliance with this Fee Program by the property owner/developer (per Resolution No. 95R-140, effective September 1, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this Mitigation Measure, or the City may enter into alternative financing arrangements with the applicant.

MM 3.10.6-7 Prior to Issuance of
the First Building Permit for Phase II, Excluding Permits for Demolition or the Relocation of the Existing SCE Transmission Lines The applicant shall submit for review and approval an Engineering Report and Phasing Plan demonstrating the incorporation of a new water supply well in the vicinity of Clementine Street and Freedman Way.

Utilities Department, Water Services; City Attorney’s Office MM 3.10.6-8 Prior to Final
Building and Zoning Inspections for Phase II
The applicant shall fund or cause to be funded the drilling of a new water supply well in the vicinity of Clementine Street and Freedman Way.

Utilities Department, Water Services; City Attorney’s Office MM 3.10.6-9
Prior to Final Building and Zoning
Inspections for the
Second Theme Park
The applicant shall cause to be constructed the site
improvements for the well in the vicinity of Clementine Street and Freedman Way.

The City recognizes that these improvements will serve not only the applicant but also other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, and the service area, each of which should contribute its allocable share of the cost of these improvements. To implement this requirement as it applies to other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, and the service area, the City shall, and shall make appropriate arrangements with other public agencies, if any, to reimburse the applicant to the extent that its contributions for these improvements exceed the applicant's allocable share of the cost. Such Utilities Department, Water Services; City Attorney’s Office

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 61 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
arrangements shall include one or more of the following: (1) creation of integrated financing districts; (2) entry into a reimbursement agreement with the applicant; 3) creation or appropriate community facilities districts, assessment districts, and/or use of similar public financing districts and/or mechanisms; and (4) creation of other such mechanisms or districts as may be appropriate to provide for the reimbursement of these costs. The determination of the allocable share of improvement costs attributable to the applicant and other property owners/developers, and reimbursement amounts, shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such improvements among property owners/developers, including the applicant, in the Specific Plan Area, the Anaheim Resort or otherwise defined service area, as applicable, depending on the area served.

The City has adopted the Anaheim Resort Water Facilities Fee Program (Rule 15E of the Water Rates, Rules and Regulations). Compliance with this Fee Program by the property owner/developer (per Resolution No. 95R-140, effective September 1, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this mitigation measure. It is noted that the City may require the applicant to provide an advance in accordance with Rule 15E of the Water Rates, Rules and Regulations to complete the site improvements for the new water supply well for which the drilling phase was previously completed under Mitigation Measure No. 3.10.6-8. The City may also enter into alternative financing arrangements with the applicant to ensure that this mitigation measure is implemented.

PDF 3.10.6-1 Eliminated
Prior to Each Final
Building and Zoning Inspection for the Disneyland Resort The Disneyland Resort will be developed with piping onsite to use reclaimed water when it is available from the County Sanitation District of Orange County (CSDOC), for use in the Disneyland Resort waterways and for irrigation. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved prior to 3/98 which eliminated the monitoring requirement for this measure in that it was duplicative of PDF 3.7-1 and separate monitoring would result in a redundant effort).

Utilities Department, Water Services

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 62 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.10.6-2 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior
to Street Relocation or
Final Building and
Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme
Park, Whichever
Occurs First
With development of the Disneyland Resort, some street rights-of-way will be relocated, therefore requiring relocation of the utilities. The following improvements are included in the development of the Disneyland Resort:
• The existing 10-inch water main in Cerritos
Avenue between Walnut Street and West
Street/Disneyland Drive will be abandoned with the
proposed realignment of this portion of Cerritos
Avenue, and a new 12-inch water main will be
installed in the new Cerritos Avenue right-of-way.
• The existing 12-inch and 14-inch water mains in
West Street/Disneyland Drive will be replaced with
a 20-inch water main and relocated with the
realignment of the West Street/Disneyland Drive right-of-way. • An onsite 12-inch dual-feed water main through
the proposed Disneyland Resort from the
proposed water line in West Street/Disneyland
Drive to the proposed water line in Harbor
Boulevard will be constructed. The dual-feed
system will create two means of water supply to any point fed from this line and will ensure good fire flow protection.

Utilities Department, WaterServices

PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITIES - WASTEWATER/SEWER
MM 3.10.7-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance
through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 63 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.10.7-2 Prior to Issuance of the
First Building Permit for the Disneyland Administration Building; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspection for the Disneyland Administration Building The applicant shall submit a report indicating that the Administration Building will not increase the sewage flows to Ball Road beyond historic levels. The applicant will upgrade or parallel the existing 1 0-inch diameter pipe in Winston Road from the Disneyland property line to West
Street/Disneyland Drive with an approximate 1 2 -inchdiameter pipe. Additionally, an upgrade or parallel pipe to the existing 10-inch diameter pipe in West Street between Winston Road and Cerritos Avenue will be
provided.

Public Works Department, Development Services Division and Design Division MM 3.10.7-3 Prior to the First Final
Building and Zoning
Inspection for Phase II,
Excluding Permits for
Demolition or the Relocation of the Existing SCETransmission Lines The applicant shall construct or cause to be constructed the following improvements:
• A City' sewer main upgrade line or parallel sewer
line to the existing 24-inch sewer main in Katella
Avenue, from the existing 27-inch District sewer line
at Walnut Street or Ninth Street to Harbor
Boulevard.
• A City sewer main upgrade line or parallel sewer line to the existing 15-inch sewer main in Harbor Boulevard from Katella Avenue to Manchester Avenue.

Public Works Department, Design Division; City Attorney's Office

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 64 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
The City recognizes that these improvements will serve not only the applicant but also other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, and the service area, each of which should contribute its allocable share of the cost of these improvements. To implement this requirement as it applies to other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, and the service area, the City shall, and shall make appropriate arrangements with other public agencies, if any, to reimburse the applicant to the extent that its contributions for these improvements exceed the applicant's allocable share of the cost. Such arrangements shall include one or more of the following: (1) creation of integrated financing districts; (2) entry into a reimbursement agreement with the applicant; (3) creation of appropriate community facilities districts, assessment districts, and/or use of similar public financing districts and/or mechanisms; and (4) creation of other such mechanisms or districts as may be appropriate to provide for the reimbursement of these costs. The determination of the allocable share of improvement costs attributable to the applicant and other property owners/developers, and reimbursement amounts, shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such improvements among property owners/developers, including the applicant, in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, or otherwise defined service area, as applicable, depending on the area served.

To implement this mitigation measure, the City has adopted the Sewer Impact and Improvement Fee Program for the South Central City Area. Compliance with this Fee Program by the property owner/developer (per Ordinance No. 5490 and Resolution No. 95R-60 dated April 18, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this Mitigation Measure, or the City may enter into alternative financing arrangements with the applicant.

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 65 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.10.7-1
To be Shown on Street Improvements Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park With development of the Disneyland Resort, some street rights-of-way will be realigned, therefore requiring concurrent relocation of the sewer line to the proposed rights-of-way as follows:
• Reconstruction of the existing pipeline in West
Street/Disneyland Drive when the street alignment is implemented. • Construction of a 15-inch to 21-inch pipeline in
Cerritos Avenue between West Street/Disneyland Drive and Walnut Street when the existing street is abandoned and relocated. • Construction of a 12-inch pipeline in West
Street/Disneyland Drive from Winston Road to Cerritos Avenue.

Public Works Department, Design Division
PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITIES – STORM DRAINS
MM 3.10.8-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.10.8-2 Prior to Approval of
Grading Plans; to be Constructed Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park Excluding the relocation of the SCE transmission lines or demolition, a detailed drainage study and plan that identifies either no increase in area historic drainage flows and no changes in area historic drainage patterns, except as already addressed through Project Design Features; or, that identifies additional drainage improvements to meet multi-year storm design frequency discharges for Phase II and Phase III improvements and to protect property in the event of a 100-year storm design frequency shall be submitted for review and approval.

It is noted that the City has adopted the Storm Drain Impact and Improvement Fee Program for the South Central City Area. Compliance with this Fee Program
by the property owner/developer (per Ordinance No.
5491 and Resolution No. 95R-61 dated April 18, 1995)
shall satisfy the requirements of this Mitigation
Measure, or the City may enter into alternative financing arrangements with the applicant.

Public Works Department, Development Services Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 66 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.10.8-3 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; Prior to approval of a Grading Plan for the South Parking Area; to be Implemented Prior to the First Final Building and Zoning Inspection for the South Parking Area The applicant shall construct or cause to be constructed detention/retention facilities in the South Parking Area to ensure that the storm water runoff from the Future Expansion District does not increase area historic drainage flows and does not alter historic drainage patterns. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved prior to 3/98 which changed timing to reflect that the grading plan was the appropriate plan with which to first monitor this measure).

Public Works Department, Development Services Division
Completed
PDF 3.10.8-1 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park If the proposed runoff will be discharging at or below area historic levels, and consistent with area historic patterns, The Disneyland Resort tributary to the Katella Avenue drainage basin will not be required to implement drainage main line infrastructure improvements. Detention/retention facilities of storm runoff may be considered in the final design phase of the overall public system; however, such proposed detention/retention facilities must have maintenance guarantees and would be required to meet strict design criteria so that they may function properly in multi-year storm design frequencies.

Public Works Department, Design Division
PDF 3.10.8-2 To be Shown on Street
Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections for the Second Theme Park Due to the proposed relocation of the portion of Cerritos Avenue between Walnut Street and West Street/Disneyland Drive, the existing storm drain lines in this part of Cerritos Avenue will be abandoned. As part of the reconstruction of Cerritos Avenue, a new storm drain line will be installed from West Street/Disneyland Drive within the new right-ofway to Walnut Street, and then in existing right-of-way along Walnut Street and Cerritos Avenue to the ABC Channel.

Public Works Department, Design Division
PDF 3.10.8-3
To be Shown on Street Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park Due to the lowering of a portion of West Street/ Disneyland Drive, a new storm drain line with a pump system shall be constructed to pump water from the sump area to the proposed Cerritos Avenue storm drain line.

Public Works Department, Design Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 67 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.10.8-4
To be Shown on Street Improvement Plans; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park Storm drain laterals are required as part of normal street construction and are listed as follows: New storm drain laterals will be constructed in West Street/Disneyland Drive north of Katella Avenue to drain runoff to Katella Avenue; in West Street/Disneyland Drive north of the realigned Cerritos Avenue to drain runoff to Cerritos Avenue; and, in Walnut Street north of existing Cerritos Avenue; and in Walnut Street north of Katella Avenue to drain runoff to Katella Avenue. All will be designed in compliance with the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central City Area.

Public Works Department, Design Division

PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITIES - ELECTRICITY
MM 3.10.9-1
Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.10.9-2 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
The property owner/developer shall submit plans showing that each of the project's buildings will comply with the State Energy Conservation Standards for New Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Code of Regulations).

Utilities Department, Resource Efficiency Section
MM 3.10.9-3 Prior to issuance of the
first Building Permit for Phases II and III
The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Anaheim to address the need, timing and financial responsibility for improvements required to serve the increase in electrical demand associated with development of the Disneyland Resort project. Pursuant to this agreement, the applicant shall provide demand projections to the City based on the applicant's development plans. When warranted by demand projections of the project, the applicant shall construct or cause to be constructed a maximum 100 MVA substation and associated facilities on the Disneyland Resort property to accommodate the increased demand. This requirement will not be necessary until the demand from the project of the existing and new Disneyland Resort project exceeds 45 MVA. The substation site shall comply with all City requirements for the necessary Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division, City Attorney's Office

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 68 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
installation and maintenance within or crossing rights-ofway. The applicant shall enter into the agreement with the City (dated March 18, 1997) to meet the increased electrical demands for opening day (June 30, 2001) of The Disneyland Resort. (Note: Environmental equivalency approved on 4/28/98 to reference the approved agreement between the City and the Walt Disney World Company. The 3/18/97 City Council staff report indicated that MMP No. 0067 identified the need to construct a 69kV electric substation on Disney’s property as a mitigation measure to address the impact of the Project on the City’s electric system. Staff determined that service can be provided through the City’s 12kV system, thereby, eliminating the need for the substation.) MM 3.10.9-4 Prior to Issuance of
Building Permit for the undergrounding of the SCE 220kV Electrical Lines If the SCE 220kV electrical lines are to be undergrounded, then a leak response/safety plan shall be submitted for review and approval and will include, at a minimum, the following information:
a. Leak and spill procedure b. Location of absorbent materials and containers c. Storage and handling procedures d. First aid measures The plan shall outline the procedures for responding to a leak or other events identified by the Fire Department.

Fire Department
PDF 3.10.9-1 Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park
The Southern California Edison transmission lines that cross the existing Disneyland South Parking Lot will be relocated, with the 66kV lines undergrounded and the 220KV lines in an aerial configuration.

Planning Department, Planning Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 69 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.10.9-1a
Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park Coordinate with the Southern California Edison Company for the relocation of the 220 kV lines and 66kV lines presently crossing the existing Disneyland theme park parking lot.

Planning Department, Planning Division
PDF 3.10.9-2 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit; to be Implemented Prior to Each Final Building and Zoning Inspection In order to conserve energy, the Disneyland Resort shall implement numerous energy saving practices in compliance with Title 10, which may include the following:
• Consultation with the City energy-conservation
experts for assistance with energy-conservation design features. • Use of high-efficiency air conditioning systems
controlled by a computerized management system including features such as a variable air volume system, a 100-percent outdoor air economizer cycle, sequential operation of air conditioning equipment in accordance with building demands, isolation of air conditioning to any selected floor or floors. • Use of electric motors designed to conserve energy. • Use of special lighting fixtures such as motion sensing lightswitch devices and compact fluorescent fixtures in place of incandescent lights. • Use of T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Metal
hallide or high-pressure sodium for outdoor lighting and parking lots.

Utilities Department, Electrical Services
PDF 3.10.9-3 At Time That Relocated
220 kV Transmission Lines Are Placed in Service
The 220KV transmission lines will use cross-phasing and/or use other reasonable methods agreed to by SCE in the aerial alignment to minimize EMF levels.

The Planning Department, Planning Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 70 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION

PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITIES - NATURAL GAS
MM 3.10.10-1 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
The property owner/developer shall submit plans which shall ensure that buildings are in conformance with the State Energy Conservation Standards for nonresidential building (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Administrative Code).

Utilities Department, Energy Services
MM 3.10.10-2
Prior to Approval of Each Final Building and Zoning Inspection The Southern California Gas Company has developed several programs which are intended to assist in the selection of most energy-efficient water heaters and furnaces. The property owner/developer shall implement a program, as required, to reduce the demand on natural gas supplies.

Planning Department, Building Division
PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITIES -ꞏTELEVISION
MM 3.10.12-1 Prior to Issuance of First
Building Permit; and, 6 Months After Topping Out for Phase II and Phase III of the Disneyland Resort Excluding the Disneyland Administration Building, a preproject study of area television reception shall be undertaken by the applicant to determine baseline conditions. After topping out for Phase II and Phase III of the Disneyland Resort, a followup study of area television reception shall be undertaken immediately by the applicant. If the City of Anaheim determines that the proposed project creates a significant impact on broadcast television reception at local residences, a signal booster or relay system shall be installed on the roof of the tallest project building to restore broadcast television reception to its original condition as soon as practicable.

Planning Department, Planning Division

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
MM 3.11-1 Varies The applicant shall implement the project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 71 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.11-2 Prior to Approval of the
First Grading Plan or Issuance of the First Demolition Permit, Whichever Occurs First, for Each Phase Investigation for the presence of cryptic tanks using geophysical methods shall be conducted in the subject area for the property owner/developer by a qualified environmental professional in the areas of former service stations and those areas known or thought to have been formerly occupied by USTs and where tank removal has not been verified prior to excavation or grading in these areas. Soil sampling or a soil organic vapor survey may be required if soil sampling results are not available or indicate contamination is present above regulatory guidelines. If warranted, subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken in these areas, and appropriate remediation measures developed, if necessary, before demolition, excavation, or grading takes place in these areas.

Orange County Health Department; Fire Department, Environmental Protection Section MM 3.11-3 Prior to Removal of
Underground Tanks; and, During Removal of Underground Tanks A permit shall be obtained for removal of underground tanks by the property owner/developer. During removal of the underground storage tank, a representative from the Environmental Protection Section shall be onsite to direct soil sampling.

Orange County Health Department; Fire Department, Environmental Protection Section MM 3.11-4 Ongoing During
Remediation
Remediation activities conducted on behalf of the property owner/developer of surface or subsurface contamination not related to USTs shall be overseen by the Orange County Health Department. Information on subsurface contamination from an underground storage tank shall be provided to the Fire Department. (Note: Mitigation measure references “Fire Department.” This was changed prior to 3/98 to Public Utilities Department, Water Services Administration, Environmental Services inasmuch as the Public Utilities Department now oversees UST and subsurface contamination remediation).

Orange County Health Department; Fire Department,
Environmental Protection Section Public Utilities Department, Water Services Administration, Environmental Services, MM 3.11-5 Prior to Approval of the
First Grading Plan or Issuance of the First Phase I Demolition Permit, Whichever Occurs First The property owner/developer will submit a plan which details procedures that will be taken if a previously unknown UST or other unknown hazardous materials or waste is discovered onsite.

Orange County Health Department; Fire Department, Environmental Protection Section

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 72 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.11-6 Prior to Approval of
Grading Plan for the Miller Tools/ Mobile Brake Site
A site reconnaissance survey of the Miller Tools/Mobile Brake building shall be conducted by a qualified environmental professional for the property owner/developer to assess any potential presence of hazardous materials at this facility. Where possible, interviews with property owners and/or company representatives shall be conducted to obtain information on the hazardous material usage histories and handling practices of the sites and, if available, copies of contaminant investigation reports shall be reviewed to evaluate the presence and level of hazardous substances in the soil at each property. The results of this investigation shall be submitted to the Orange County Health Department for review and approval. If warranted, subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken by a qualified environmental professional in coordination with the Orange County Health Department. Appropriate remediation measures will be developed, if necessary, before demolition, excavation, or grading take place in these areas.

Orange County Health Department; Fire Department, Environmental Protection Section MM 3.11-7 Prior to Approval of
Grading Plan or Issuance of Demolition Permit, Whichever Occurs First A qualified environmental consultant shall attempt to contact the current and/or known former owners of the following on behalf of a property owner/developer within the C-R Overlay Area; the 7-11 convenience store and the vacant parcels at 1340 S. West Street/Disneyland Drive and 321 West Katella Avenue to obtain information regarding the status of underground tanks and/or tank closures at these sites. If necessary, subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken by a qualified environmental professional. Results of those analyses shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. The following properties have completed this measure as of July 1996: Katella Car Wash, 350 W. Katella Avenue; the Shell Service Station, 2100 S. Harbor Boulevard; National Car Rental.

Fire Department, Environmental Protection Section

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 73 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
MM 3.11-8 Prior to Relocation of
Transformers Within Non- Disney-Controlled Properties or City-OwnedTransformers Within the Specific Plan Area That May Contain PCBs Which Are Being Moved or Relocated as Part of Project Development, The transformers shall be tested by the property owner/developer for PCBs.

Utilities Department, Electric Services
MM 3.11-9 Prior to Approval of
Grading Plan or Issuance of Excavation Permit
For the northern portion of the West Street/Disneyland Drive strawberry farm (pumphouse area), the small remaining amount of shallow soil affected by lubricating oil shall be handled and disposed of according to all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations.

Orange County Health Department; Fire Department, Environmental Protection Section MM 3.11-10 Prior to Approval of
Grading Plan or Issuance of Excavation Permit
Several representative samples of shallow soils shall be collected and analyzed by the property owner/developer for pesticide and herbicide residue in the West Street/Disneyland Drive agricultural area and the S&S Nurseries area. If soils containing pesticides or herbicides above regulated limits are found, remedial actions shall be carried out before disturbance of the soils. Remedial actions should consist of removal and disposal or treatment of affected soils according to all applicable local, state, and federal regulations.

Orange County Health Department; Fire Department, Environmental Protection Section; Orange County Agriculture Department PDF 3.11-1* Ongoing During Project
Operation
The current compliance efforts for hazardous materials utilized at the existing Disneyland theme park and Disneyland Hotel described under Section 3.11.1.1, shall be expanded to encompass the Disneyland Resort to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

Fire Department

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 74 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION

VISUAL RESOURCES AND AESTHETICS
MM 3.12-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.12-2 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit; to be Implemented Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections The property owner/developer shall submit plans which illustrate that all mechanical equipment and trash areas for the subject buildings will be screened from adjacent public streets and adjacent residential areas.

Planning Department, Planning Division
MM 3.12-3 Prior to issuance of
Each Building Permit With the exception of the West Parking Facility and Exclusive of the Theme Parks including the Retail/Entertainment Component, Prior to Issuance of Each Building Permit (for non-Setback Realm Areas); Prior to approval of Final Site Plan (for Setback Realm Areas) For the West Parking Facility: prior to approval of initial building permits for interim condition of a portion of the West Parking Area (for the final landscape plans for the Walnut Street Setback area and for the area adjacent to The property owner/developer shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan for areas outside of the theme parks.

This plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall include a phasing plan for the installation and maintenance of landscaping associated with that building permit. (Note: Prior to 10/97, environmental equivalent approved which clarifies the timing relative to the Setback Realm Areas and non-Setback Realm Areas and its inapplicability to the theme parks including the retail/entertainment component. It should be noted that this measure will apply to and be monitored with the ultimate landscaping only and not with any interim landscaping condition. On 10/8/97, environmental equivalent approved to clarify the timing for the West Parking Facility as the SP-4 portion of the West Parking Area will first be developed to accommodate surface parking in an interim condition only. Implementation of this measure for all of the West Parking Area would require substantial portions of the landscaping to be removed in order to implement plans for the ultimate condition of the West Parking Area.) Planning Department, Planning Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 75 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
the Walnut Street soundwall in the private realm); and prior to approval of building permits for the ultimate condition of the West Parking Area (for the final landscape plans for West Street/ Disneyland Drive setback landscape, Cerritos Ave. setback landscape, landscaping at entrance to hotels and landscaping interior to hotel and RD&E parking).

MM 3.12-4 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit for Each Parking Facility Along Walnut Street; to be Implemented Prior to Each Final Building and Zoning Inspection The property owner/developer shall submit plans which detail the lighting system for the parking facilities along Walnut Street. The systems shall be designed and maintained in such a manner as to conceal light sources to the extent feasible to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer, with a letter from the engineer stating that, in the opinion of the engineer, this requirement has been met.

Planning Department, Planning Division
MM 3.10.7-3 MM 3.12-5
Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspection for the Disneyland Resort The applicant shall participate in a landscape assessment and maintenance district, if one is established for the Anaheim Resort.

City Attorney's Office

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 76 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.12-1 Prior to Approval of
Final Site Plan or Issuance of Each Building Permit, Whichever Occurs First The proposed Specific Plan incorporates design guidelines as well as zoning and development standards, many of which have been designed to reduce the potential visual impacts of the project and to present a visually integrated resort area, including:
 The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for
heavily landscaped streetscapes and gives the guidelines for trees and shrubs, light fixtures, benches, monuments, and signs located within the landscaped area.  The East and West Parking Areas and the hotel parking facilities will have landscaped setbacks from the public right-of-way and are restricted in height.  Rights-of-way will be landscaped to add to the
aesthetics of the area.
• The landscape treatments will vary to create distinct places visually.
• The West Parking Area and hotel parking facilities will be terraced back from Walnut Street with landscaping treatments above 40 feet. In addition, canopy trees will be planted in a center median on Walnut Street, and the parkway along the street will be landscaped. • A coordinated color theme for major street features will be incorporated into the design.
• The service areas and back-of-house areas will be
screened from public view.
• All rooftop equipment on buildings will be screened as per the Specific Plan.
 A layered landscape treatment in the setback realm
will provide screening of a 9-14 feet in height sound wall adjacent to the Southwest Parking Area.

Planning Department, Planning Division; Community Services Department, Parks Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 77 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION

CULTURAL RESOURCES
MM 3.13-1 Prior to Approval of
Each Grading Plan
The property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented:
a. The archaeologist must be present at the pregrading
conference in order to establish procedures fortemporarily halting or redirecting work to permit thesampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts ifpotentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall
determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the
property owner/developer for exploration and/or
salvage.
b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the
grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational or research institution. c. Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted.

Public Works Department, Development Services Division
MM 3.13-2 Prior to Approval of
Each Grading Plan
The property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented:
a. The paleontologist must be present at the pregrading conference in order to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the Public Works Department, Development Services Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 78 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the
grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational research institution. c. Any paleontological work at the site shall be
conducted under the direction of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted. Upon
completion of the grading, the paleontologist shall
notify the City as to when the final report will be
submitted.

ENERGY
MM 3.14-1 Varies The applicant shall implement all project design features or their environmental equivalent. The City of Anaheim Planning Department will ensure compliance through the mitigation monitoring process.

Refer to Note #7 on page 1.

MM 3.14-2 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit
The property owner/developer shall demonstrate on plans that fuel-efficient models of gas-powered building equipment have been incorporated into the proposed project to the extent feasible.

Planning Department, Building Division

THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
- 79 -

TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION
PDF 3.14-1* Prior to Final Building
and Zoning Inspection for the Second Theme Park; and, Ongoing During Project Operation
The project shall be developed in conformance with The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and shall offer a broad diversity of theme park, retail, dining and entertainment experiences which will enhance the destination resort character of The Disneyland Resort. As a result, many visitors will extend their length of stay; thus, incremental vehicular trips to and from the site are expected to be reduced. (Note: Environmental equivalent approved prior to 3/98 which eliminated the requirement for monitoring this feature on an ongoing basis during project operation in that the approval of the various project components will constitute satisfaction of the feature).

Planning Department, Planning Division
PDF 3.14-2 Prior to Issuance of
Each Building Permit for Public Day-Use Parking Facilities The public parking facilities, which may be used for theme park guest parking, shall be designed in accordance with the speed parking procedures set forth in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards, of the Specific Plan which will assist in reducing vehicular fuel from idling engines.

Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division TABLE 3.3-16

SECOND THEME PARK MITIGATION PLAN
- 1 -

LOCATION DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT
I. Project Design Features
A. Streets
West Street
West Street (Katella Avenue to Ball Road)
Freedman Way (Harbor Boulevard to
Clementine Street: Clementine Street to I-5)
Clementine Street (Freedman Way to Katella
Avenue)
Walnut Street (Adjacent to strawberry field and
median from Katella Avenue to Ball Road)
Cerritos Avenue (Walnut to West)
B. Intersections
Ball Road/West Street/Disneyland Drive
Harbor Boulevard/Freedman Way
Anaheim Boulevard/Freedman Way
Clementine Street/Freedman Way
Walnut Street/Cerritos Avenue (N)
Walnut Street/Cerritos Avenue (S)
Ball Road Overcrossing
Realignment and reconstruction
Widening
Widening
Widening
Realignment and reconstruction
Complete redesign
Complete redesign
Add 3rd through eastbound and westbound, 2nd leftturn eastbound 3rd through eastbound and westbound, left-tum eastbound and westbound, remove right-tum northbound, and left turn southbound, 2nd through northbound and southbound
Realign
Reconfigure
II. Mitigation Measures
Anaheim Boulevard/Ball Road
Euclid Street/Ball Road
Harbor Boulevard/Chapman Avenue
Walnut Street/Ball Road
Baseline
Add 2nd left-tum
northbound, southbound
Add 2nd left-tum northbound,
southbound
Add 2nd left-tum eastbound and
westbound, remove right-tum
eastbound and westbound
Add eastbound through
Project
Add right-tum westbound
Add 2nd left-tum eastbound, and
westbound, remove right-tum
eastbound
Add 2nd left-tum northbound
and southbound, remove righttum southbound
TABLE 3.3-16

SECOND THEME PARK MITIGATION PLAN
- 2 -

LOCATION DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT
III. Katella Avenue Smart Street"
Katella Avenue/West Street/Disneyland Drive
Euclid Street/Katella Avenue
Harbor Boulevard/Katella Avenue
Anaheim Blvd./Haster Street/Katella Avenue
IV. I-5 Improvements
I-5 Southbound at West Street
V. The Disneyland Administration
Building Mitigation Plan
Anaheim Boulevard/Ball Road
West Street (N)/Ball Road
Ball Road/DLAB Driveway
VI. South Parking Area
Clementine Street/Katella Avenue
Haster Street, south of Katella Avenue
Add right-tum westbound
Add 2nd left-tum eastbound, westbound
Add right-tum southbound
Add right-tum eastbound and westbound
Mixed-flow off-ramp
Add a westbound right-tum lane
Restripe/redesign the existing westbound right-tum lane to a shared right-through lane
Redesign the westbound left-tum lane to provide 150 feet of dual lane storage or 250 feet of single lane storage and the eastbound right-tum lane to provide 250 feet of storage
Redesign the DLAB entrance driveway to provide three inbound lanes and a minimum of two outbound lanes, with its own parking entrance gate at approximately 150 feet south of the intersection South half-width of six lane arterial adjacent to applicant-owned property plus eastbound right-tum only; dual left-tum lanes eastbound and westbound
West half-width of ultimate six lane arterial south of Katella Avenue to the southern property line of the South Parking Area, plus 150 foot right-turn only lane to right-in only driveway at South Parking Area access
Further improvements, if necessary, to maintain Clementine Street/Katella Avenue intersection at not worse than LOS D shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer a. Refer to Section 3.3.3, Project Design Features, for a more detailed description. b. Eligible Katella Smart Street improvements are scheduled to be funded from Measure M. c. Currently proposed as part of I-5 widening project.
d. Ultimate right-of-way and improvements details will be coordinated with the applicant and will be set forth in the final improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
1 Terms and Definitions 1. Property Owner/Developer  Any owner or developer of real property within the Anaheim Report Specific Plan Area. 2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing  Any mitigation measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City, which will have the same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning and Building Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed “environmental equivalent timing” and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be borne by the property owner/developer. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the City’s adopted Fee Schedule.

3. Timing  This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Plan will occur, as routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure has been complied with. For example, if the timing is “to be shown on approved building plans” subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance.

4. Responsibility for Monitoring  Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all departments listed for each mitigation measure. Outside public agency review is limited to those public agencies specified in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan which have permit authority in conjunction with the mitigation measure.

5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures  The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer in January of each year demonstrating how compliance with the subject measure(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the measure will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored “Ongoing During Construction,” the annual letter will review those measures only while construction is occurring; monitoring will be discontinued after construction is complete. A final annual letter will be provided at the close of construction.

6. Building Permit  For purposes of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building or structural expansion or modification of any existing building, but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions to an existing structure or building.

AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
UPDATED AND MODIFIED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 85C 2 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
AESTHETICSMM 5.1-1 Prior to final site plan
approval
Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner/developer shall submit a shade and shadow analysis to the Planning and Building Department for review and approval demonstrating that the proposed structure(s) would avoid creating significant shade and shadow impacts on adjacent land uses to the maximum extent feasible. A significant shade and shadow impact would occur when outdoor active areas (e.g., outdoor eating areas, hotel/motel swimming pools, and residential front and back yards) or structures that include sensitive uses (e.g., residences) have windows that normally receive sunlight are covered by shadows for more than 50 percent of the sunlight hours.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.1-2 Prior to issuance of
building permits
Prior to issuance of building permits, all plumbing or other similar pipes and fixtures located on the exterior of the building shall be shown on plans as fully screened from view of adjacent public rights-of-way and from adjacent properties by architectural devices and/or appropriate building materials. A note indicating that these improvements will be installed prior to final building and zoning inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.1-3 Ongoing Ongoing, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for the removal of any on-site graffiti within 24 hours of its application.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.1-4 Prior to Final Site Plan
approval
Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the location and configuration of all lighting fixtures including ground-mounted lighting fixtures utilized to accent buildings, landscape elements, or to illuminate pedestrian areas shall be shown on all Final Site Plans. All proposed surface parking area lighting fixtures shall be down-lighted with a maximum height of 12 feet adjacent to any residential properties. All lighting fixtures shall be shielded to direct lighting toward the area to be illuminated and away from adjacent residential property lines.

Planning and Building Department
3 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM 5.1-5 Prior to final building and
zoning inspections
Prior to final building and zoning inspections, private streets within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area shall have street lights installed which are compatible with the design standards used for the public streets as determined by the Public Utilities Department.

Public Utilities Department
MM 5.1-6 Prior to final building and
zoning inspections
Prior to final building and zoning inspections, root and sidewalk barriers shall be provided for trees within seven feet of public sidewalks.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.1-7 Prior to final building and
zoning inspections
Prior to final building and zoning inspections, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department a letter from a licensed landscape architect certifying that all landscaping and irrigation systems have been installed in accordance with landscaping plans approved in connection with the Final Site Plan.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.1-8 Ongoing Ongoing, all on-site non-Public Realm landscaping and irrigation systems, and Public Realm landscaping and irrigation systems, within area in which dedication has not been accepted by the City, shall be maintained by the property owner/developer, in compliance with City standards.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.1-9 Ongoing Ongoing, any tree planted within the Setback Realm shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.1-10 Ongoing Ongoing, a licensed arborist shall be hired by the property owner/developer to be responsible for all tree trimming.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.1-11 Prior to issuance of each
building permits
Prior to issuance of each building permits, unless records indicate previous payment, a fee for street tree purposes shall be paid or cause to be paid to the City of Anaheim based on the length of street frontage in an amount as established by City Council resolution or credit against the fee given for City authorized improvements installed by the property owner/developer.

Planning and Building Department
4 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM 5.1-12 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, all air conditioning facilities and other roof and ground-mounted equipment shall be shown on plans as shielded from public view and the sound buffered to comply with City of Anaheim noise ordinances from any adjacent residential or transientoccupied properties. A note indicating that these improvements shall be installed prior to final building and zoning inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.1-13 Prior to Final Site Plan
approval
Prior to Final Site Plan approval, plans shall show that the rear elevations of buildings visible from off-site areas shall be architecturally accented to portray a finished look.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.1-14 Prior to Final Site Plan
approval
Prior to Final Site Plan approval, plans shall show that no shuttle/bus/vehicular drop-off areas shall be permitted in hotel/motel or vacation resort front setback area.

Planning and Building Department
AIR QUALITYMM 5.2-1 Ongoing during project
operation
Ongoing during project operation, the property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce emissions to the extent practical, schedule goods movements for off-peak traffic hours, and use clean fuel for vehicles and other equipment, as practicable.

Planning and Building Department
MM 5.2-2 Prior to the issuance of
each building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence that low emission paints and coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings, in compliance with SCAQMD regulations. The information shall be denoted on the project plans and specifications. The property owner/developer shall submit an architectural coating schedule and calculations demonstrating that VOC emissions from architectural coating operations would not exceed 75 pounds per day averaged over biweekly periods. The calculations shall show, for each coating, the surface area to be coated, gallons (or liters) of coating per unit surface area, and VOC content per gallon (or liter). The property owner/developer shall also implement the following to limit emissions from architectural coatings and asphalt usage:

Planning and Building Department
5 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
a. Use non-solvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate; b. Use solvent-based coatings, where they are necessary.

MM 5.2-3 Ongoing during
construction
Ongoing during construction, the property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce construction-related air quality impacts. These measures shall include, but are not limited to:
a. Normal wetting procedures (at least twice daily) or other dust palliative measures shall be followed during earth-moving operations to minimize fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code including application of chemical soil stabilizers to exposed soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover in disturbed areas as quickly as practicable. b. For projects where there is excavation for subterranean facilities (such as parking) on-site haul roads shall be watered at least every two hours or the on-site haul roads shall be paved. c. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approved soil binders, according to manufacturer’s specification, to exposed piles. d. Roadways adjacent to the project shall be swept and cleared of any spilled export materials at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust; and, haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of materials exported from the project site occur.
e. Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the project site. f. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall be covered prior to entering public streets.
g. Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not carry dirt on tires onto public streets, including treating onsite roads and staging areas.

Planning and Building Department
6 Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Department
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
h. Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes. i. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed. j. Reduce Traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less.
k. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust) exceed 25 miles per hour and during first and second stage smog alerts. l. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible emissions from construction. m. Use low emission mobile construction equipment (e.g., tractors, scrapers, dozers, etc.) where practicable.
n. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators rather than temporary power generators, where practicable. o. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned.
p. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable.

MM 5.2-4 Prior to issuance of each
grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan) Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all can be reused on the project site.