2. Prohousing Designation Application with Attachments — Anaheim City Council, June 9, 2026 (part 1 of 3)

Prohousing Designation Program Application
State of C
alifornia
Governor Gavin Newsom
Tomi
quia Moss, Secretary
Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency
Gustav
o Velasquez, Director
Department of Housing and Community Development
Megan K
irkeby, Deputy Director
Division of Housing Policy Development
651 Bannon
Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
Websit
e: http://www.hcd.ca.gov/planning-and-community-development/prohousing- designation-program
Email: [email protected]
February 20
25 Application Checklist
Yes No
Application Information ☒ ☐
Certification and Acknowledgement ☒ ☐
The Legislative Information form is completed. ☒ ☐
The Threshold Requirements Checklist is completed. ☒ ☐
A duly adopted and certified Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program is included in the application package. (See Appendix 1 for the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program form.)
☒ ☐
If applicable, the Proposed Policy Completion Schedule is completed. (See Appendix 2.)
☒ ☐
The Self-Scoring Sheet is completed. (See Appendix 3 for the Self- Scoring Sheet and the Sample Self-Scoring Sheet.)
☒ ☐
One-page summary describing consistency with the 7 Principles for Addressing Encampments is completed. (See Appendix 5 for a template to assist.)
☒ ☐
The checklist confirming that a Diligent Public Participation process was conducted. (See Appendix 6 for the template.)
☒ ☐
Additional information and supporting documentation (Applicant to provide as Appendix 7.)
☒ ☐
Appli
cation Information
Applicant (Jurisdiction): City of Anaheim – Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division
Applicant Mailing Address: 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. 1st Floor City: Anaheim
ZIP Code: 92805
Website: https://www.anaheim.net/490/Planning-
Building
Authorized Representative Name Joanne Hwang
Authorized Representative Title: Deputy Director of Planning Services Division
Phone: (714) 765-5139
Email: [email protected]
Contact Person Name: Christine Nguyen
Contact Person Title: Senior Planner
Phone: (714) 765-4942
Email: [email protected]
Total Self-Score (Based on Appendix 3): 61

CERTIFICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT

As authorized by the Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program (Resolution No. ) , which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full, I hereby submit this full and complete application on behalf of the applicant.

I certify that all information and representations set forth in this application are true and correct.

I further certify that any proposed Prohousing Policy identified herein will be enacted within two (2) years of the date of this application submittal.

I acknowledge that this application constitutes a public record under the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.) and is therefore subject to public disclosure by the Department.

Signature: __________________________________________

Name and Title: Joanne Hwang, Deputy Director of Planning Services Division

Date: June , 2026

Legislative Information

District Number Legislators Name(s)

State
Assembly
District

59 67
68 Phillip Chen
Sharon Quirk-Silva
Avelino Valencia

State
Senate
District

34 37
Thomas J. Umberg
Steven Choi

Applicants can find their respective State Senate representatives at https://www.senate.ca.gov/, and their respective State Assembly representatives at https://www.assembly.ca.gov/

Threshold Requirements Checklist

The applicant meets the following threshold requirements in accordance with Section 6604 of the Regulations:

Yes No
The applicant is a Jurisdiction. ☒ ☐
The applicant has adopted a Compliant Housing Element. ☒ ☐ The applicant has submitted or will submit a legally sufficient Annual Progress Report prior to designation.
☒ ☐
The applicant has completed or agrees to complete, on or before the relevant statutory deadlines, any rezone program or zoning that is necessary to remain in compliance with Government Code sections 65583, subdivision (c)(1), and 65584.09, subdivision (a), and with California Coastal Commission certification where appropriate. ☒ ☐
The applicant is in compliance, at the time of the application, with applicable state housing law, including, but not limited to those included in Government Code section 65585, subdivision (j); laws relating to the imposition of school facilities fees or other requirements (Gov. Code, § 65995 et seq.); Least Cost Zoning Law (Gov. Code, § 65913.1); Permit Streamlining Act (Gov. Code, § 65920 et seq.); and provisions relating to timeliness of CEQA processing by local governments in Public Resources Code sections 21080.1, 21080.2, and 21151.5(a). ☒ ☐
The applicant further acknowledges and confirms that its treatment of homeless encampments on public property complies with and will continue to comply with the constitutional rights of persons experiencing homelessness and that it has submitted a one-page summary to the Department demonstrating how the applicant has enacted best practices in their jurisdiction related to the treatment of unhoused individuals camping on public property, consistent with United States Interagency Council on Homelessness’ “7 Principles for Addressing Encampments,” (June 17, 2022 update), hereby incorporated by reference. ☒ ☐
The applicant has duly adopted and certified, by the applicant’s governing body, a Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program, which is hereby incorporated by reference. (A true and correct copy of the resolution is included in this application package.) ☒ ☐

Appendix 1: Formal Resolution for the Prohousing Designation Program

[Signed Copy to be Inserted Here]

Appendix 2: Proposed Policy Completion Schedule
The City of Anaheim adopted several prohousing policy changes during the drafting, public outreach, and adoption phases of the 6th Cycle Housing Element and is not proposing any additional amendments or policy changes at this time.

Category
Number
Concise Written Description of
Proposed Policy
Key Milestones and
Milestone Dates
Anticipated
Completion
Date
Notes
Appendix 3: Self-Scoring Sheet and Sample Self-Scoring Sheet Category
Number
Concise Written Description of Prohousing
Policy
Enacted
or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution,
zoning code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 7
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total
Points
1A 6th Cycle Housing Element Appendix B
has "Total Units: Pipeline Projects, ADU,
and Candidate Sites" of 27,735. The
RHNA obligation is 17,453. This is 159% of
the obligation.

E Housing
Element
Electronic copy
attached
(Attachment
1A)
3 2 1 4
1B The Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC)
Section 18.38.255 Two-Unit Development
and Urban Lot Split; doesn’t go beyond
what is required by SB 9.

E Zoning Code 0 0 0 0
1C Points awarded in 1A. 0 0 0 0
1D AMC Section 18.52.020 does not exceed
statutory requirements under the Density
Bonus Law.

E Zoning Code 0 0 0 0
1E City’s ADU and Two-Unit Development and
Urban Lot Split regulations do not increase
density beyond what is required by the
State.

E Zoning Code 0 0 0 0
1F City’s residential parking requirements are
not less restrictive than the State’s
requirements.

E Zoning Code 0 0 0 0
1G The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0
1H AMC Section 18.08.030 Table 8-A allows
single-family detached, single-family
attached, and multifamily in the General
Commercial (C-G) and Low Intensity Office
(O-L) zones.

E Zoning Code AMC Section

18.08.030
1 2 1 2
1I Modification to structural setbacks can be
done through CUP per AMC Section

18.06.090.

E Zoning Code AMC Section

18.06.090
1 5 1 2

E Municipal Code AMC Chapter

17.40 1 7 1 2
1L The City updated their Land Use Element,
including the Zoning Code and General
Plan amendments associated with the
Housing Element Update and Center City
Corridors Implementation Plan to provide
for new residential and mixed-use
opportunities throughout the city. This was
implemented through the adoption of
Chapter 18.12 (Mixed-Use Zones),
amendments to the Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan, and the rescission
of Chapters 18.30 (Downtown Mixed Use
(DMU) Overlay Zone) and 18.32 (Mixed
Use (MU) Overlay Zone).

E Land Use
Element and
Zoning Code
Land Use
Element
AMC C
hapter

18.12 1 1 2 3
2A The City’s zoning code permits a variety of
housing types by right. Multi-Family
Residential Zones allow multi-family,
single-family, supportive, and transitional
housing through a ministerial approval
process. The Residential Opportunities
Overlay Zone permits by-right multi-family
residential development throughout the
City at densities consistent with the
General Plan. The Platinum Triangle Mixed
Use Overlay Zone also permits by-right
single-family, senior, supportive, and
transitional housing. Together, these zones
and approval processes support efficient
E Zoning Code AMC Section

18.06.030
Multiple-Family
Uses
Resi
dential
Opportunities
Overlay Zone
Plat
inum
Triangle Mixed
Use Overlay
Zone
3 1 2 5

Category
Number
Concise Written Description of Prohousing
Policy
Enacted
or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution,
zoning code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 7
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total
Points
land use by enabling a wider range of
higher-density housing types and
increasing housing supply to support
affordability.
2B The City has maintained a consistent
practice of program-level CEQA analysis
tied to its General Plan. Program EIR No.
330 was certified in 2004 for the General
Plan and Zoning Code Update;
Supplemental EIR No. 346 followed in
2013 to provide environmental
documentation for the 2014–2021 Housing
Element (pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15163); and Program EIR No. 356
was certified in 2025 for a focused General
Plan update. Together, these documents
reflect the City's ongoing commitment to
streamlined, program-level environmental
review.

E General Plan
EIRs
Environmental
Impact Reports
| Anaheim, CA
- Official
Website
2 0 0 2
2C The East South Street Residential project
had streamlined review under SB 226 for
an infill development.

E Website East South
Street
Residential
2 2 1 3
2D The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0
2E AMC Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family
Residential Zones) provides for ministerial,
by-right approval of residential
development projects that meet objective
zoning standards, including requirements
for density, height, setbacks, parking, and
design. Because compliance is determined
based on clear, measurable criteria,
qualifying projects consistent with the
E Zoning Code AMC Chapter

18.06 Multiple-
Family
Residential
Zones
2 2 1 3

E Review
Timeline
Document
Electronic copy
attached
(Attachment
2G)
1 0 0 1
2H AMC Chapter 18.40 General Development
Standards are objective within the code.

Graphical depictions of the code are
provided for commonly referenced zones
and corridors with special guidelines.

E Zoning Code AMC Chapter

18.40 General
Development
Standards
1 0 0 1
2I The Planning Division uses GoPost portal;
Building Division uses AnaheimNEXT for
most permits - select permits go through a
different portal. These establish a one-
stop-shop permitting processes or a single
point of contact where entitlements are
coordinated across city approval functions
(e.g., planning, public works, building) from
entitlement application to certificate of
occupancy.

E Websites GoPost Portal
Anahe
imNEXT
1 0 0 1
2J Streamlined process for ADUs, including
reduced processing times under ADU
Express. Pre-approved ADU catalogue
also expedites review times.

E Website ADU Anaheim |
Anaheim, CA -
Official Website
1 2 1 2
2K Entitlement applications are separated by
types.
0 0 0 0

E Website Andy’s Map
Development
Activity |
Anaheim, CA -
Official Website
Building
Permits
https://www.an
aheim.net/529/
Building-
Permit-Reports
1 0 0 1
2M Points awarded under 2E. 0 0 0 0
2N The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0
3A Anaheim has a Soil Report Waiver for
Residential structures in R-3 Occupancies.

E Waiver Form Soils-Report-
Waiver-for-
Residential-
Structures-R3-
Occupancies
3 2 1 4
3B Anaheim has pre-approved ADU design
plans. These ADU plans have already
been reviewed and approved by the City of
Anaheim and are available for local
property owners. Additional options will
continue to be made available.

E Website Pre-Approved
Plan Catalogue
| Anaheim, CA
- Official
Website
2 2 1 3
3C Anaheim's Fee Deferral Program -
payment of impact fees for new residential
and commercial development to be
deferred until the development is ready for
final inspection.

E Anaheim's Fee
Deferral
Program
Anaheim's Fee
Deferral
Program
1 8 1 2
3D AMC Chapter 18.26 Mobile Home Park
Overlay Zone (MHP) - provides for the
orderly growth and development of sites
for mobile home parks, consistent with the
E Zoning Code AMC Chapter

18.26 Mobile
Home Park
1 1 2 3

Overlay Zone
(MHP)
3E The 2017 Anaheim Bicycle Master Plan is a
policy document that guides the City of
Anaheim in its implementation of citywide
bicycle facilities. The Plan identifies a
network of existing and proposed bicycle
facilities that will improve multi -modal
connectivity and increase bicycle mode
share, especially for short trips. Thi s is
achieved through a system of on-street bike
lanes and routes and off-street bike paths to
connect residents, visitors, and workers to
their destinations. The Bicycle Mas ter Plan
increases access to public transportation by
increasing bicycle mode share options. It
also acts as a climate change solution as
bicycling is a more climate friendly
transportation option.

E 2017 Anaheim
Bicycle Master
Plan
Bicycle Master
Plan |
Anaheim, CA -
Official Website
1 1 2 3
3F Anaheim has Universal Design Guidelines
via the Accessible Home. These principles
guide the design and construction of
homes to incorporate features that are
usable by people of all abilities.

E Anaheim
Universal
Design
Guidelines
Anaheim
Universal
Design
Guidelines
1 0 0 1
3G The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0
3H The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0

E Developer
Incentives
Program
Developer
Incentives
Programs
Website
1 8 1 2
4A The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0
4B On August 20, 2024, the City Council
adopted the Anaheim Local Housing Trust
Fund Ordinance No. 6588 which
established the Anaheim Local Housing
Trust Fund (A-LHTF). The A-LHTF is
designed to receive and invest public and
private contributions, including the local in-
lieu fees, state and federal housing grants,
and philanthropic donations, to implement
strategic housing solutions.

E Ordinance No.
6588
Electronic copy
attached
(Attachment
4B)
2 8 1 3
4C On May 29, 2025, the City Council adopted
the Anaheim Local Housing Trust
Guidelines and Fund Allocation Plan. To
address these needs, the A-LHTF will
invest in three primary program areas:
o Build More Homes
Initiative: Funds the development
and rehabilitation of affordable
rental and for-sale housing to
increase the city's long-term
supply.
o First-Time Homeowners
Program: Offers financial support
for low- and moderate-income
households to purchase their first
home in Anaheim.

E Anaheim Local
Housing Trust
Guidelines and
Fund Allocation
Plan
Electronic copy
attached
(Attachment
4C)
2 8 1 3

Category
Number
Concise Written Description of Prohousing
Policy
Enacted
or
Proposed
Documentation
Type (e.g.,
resolution,
zoning code)
Insert Web
Links to
Documents or
Indicate that
Electronic
Copies are
Attached as
Appendix 7
Points Enhancement
Category
Number
Enhancement
Points
Total
Points
o Housing Stability
Program: Provides one-time
emergency assistance to prevent
displacement of low-income
seniors and families at risk of
eviction or homelessness.
4D The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0
4E The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0
4F The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0
4G The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0
4H The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0
4I The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0
4J The jurisdiction does not currently have a
standard for this policy.
0 0 0 0
4K The city leverages the Anaheim Housing
Authority's project based vouchers to
assist with the operational gap funding for
permanent supportive housing. A recent
example is the Azure Apartments.

Staff Report
and Contract
Electronic copy
attached
(Attachment
4K)
1 0 0 1
4L AMC Section 17.32.040 exempts
affordable housing developments from
Transportation Impact Fees. This reduces
financial burden and affirmatively furthers
fair and affordable housing developments.

E Municipal Code AMC Section

17.32.040
1 8 1 2
4M On August 14, 2018, the City Council
adopted an Affordable Housing Policy
affirming that affordable housing is a
priority in the City of Anaheim in response
E Affordable
Housing
Website
Affordable-
Housing
Website
1 8 1 2

TOTAL 38 23 61
Appendix 4: Examples of Prohousing Policies with Enhancement Factors If a Pr
ohousing Policy incorporates any of the enhancement factors specified in the Scoring Criteria Enhancement Factors chart, it will receive extra points as indicated therein. Examples of such qualifying Prohousing Policies include the following:

Categ
ory 1: Favorable Zoning and Land Use (1A: EF2, 1H: EF2, 1I: EF5, 1K: EF7, 1L:

EF1)
• The Ci
ty of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 1A for sufficient sites as established in the 6th Cycle Housing Element Appendix B and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 2 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 1H for allowing residential uses in non-residential zones as established in the Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.08.030 and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 2 points. • The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 1I for modification of development standards to allow increases density as established in the Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.06.090 and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 5 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 1K for establishment of inclusionary housing programs as established in the Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 17.40 and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 7 points. • The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 1L for other zoning and land use actions the measurably support the Acceleration of Housing Production as established in the Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.12 and the General Plan Land Use Element and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 1 points.

Categ
ory 2: Acceleration of Housing Production Timeframes (2A: EF1, 2C: EF2, 2E:

EF2, 2J: EF2)
• The Ci
ty of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 2A for the establishment of ministerial approval processes for multiple housing types as established in the Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.06.030, the Residential Opportunities Overlay Zone, and the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 1 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 2C for the documented practice of streamlining housing development at the project level as demonstrated by the East South Street Residential project and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 2 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 2E for the elimination of public hearings for projects consistent with zoning and the general plan as established in the Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.06 and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 2 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 2J for the priority permit processing or reduced plan check times for ADUs/JADUs or multifamily housing as demonstrated by the ADU Anaheim Official Website and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 2 points.

Category 3: Reduction of Construction and Development Costs (3A: EF2, 3B: EF2, 3C:

EF8, 3D: EF1, 3E: EF1, 3I: EF8)
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 3A for the waiver or significant reduction of development impact fees for residential development with units affordable to Lower-Income Households as demonstrated by the Anaheim Soil Report Waiver for Residential structures in R-3 Occupancies and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 2 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 3B for the adoption of policies that reduce barriers for property owners to create ADUs/JADUs as demonstrated by the Anaheim Pre-Approved ADU Design Catalog and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 2 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 3C for the adoption of fee reduction strategies that reduce fees for housing for persons with special needs as demonstrated by Anaheim's Fee Deferral Program and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 8 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 3D for the accelerating housing production through innovative housing types as established in the Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.26 Mobile Home Park Overlay Zone (MHP) and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 1 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 3E for the measures that reduce costs for transportation-related infrastructure or programs that encourage active modes of transportation or other alternatives to automobiles as established in the 2017 Anaheim Bicycle Master Plan and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 1 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 3I for other policies that quantifiably reduce construction or development costs.as demonstrated by the Anaheim Developer Incentives Program and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 8 points.

Categ
ory 4: Providing Financial Subsidies (4B: EF8, 4C: EF8, 4L: 3F8, 4M: EF8) • The Ci
ty of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 4B for the establishment of local housing trust funds or collaboration on a regional housing trust fund, which include the Jurisdiction’s own funding contributions as demonstrated by the adopted Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 8 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 4C for the demonstration of regular use or planned regular use of funding for preserving assisted units at-risk of conversion to market rate uses and conversion of market rate uses to units with affordability restrictions as demonstrated by the Anaheim Local Housing Trust Guidelines and Fund Allocation Plan and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 8 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 4L for the provision of subsidies for housing affordable to Extremely Low-Income Households as the established by the Anaheim Municipal Code Section 17.32.040 for the exemption of affordable housing developments from Traffic Impact Fees and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 8 points.
• The City of Anaheim PDP application qualifies for points under Category 4M for other policies that quantifiably promote, develop, or leverage financial resources for housing affordable to Lower-Income Households as the established by the Anaheim adopted Affordable Housing Policy and also qualifies for Enhancement Factor 8 points.

Appendix 5: Homeless Encampment Template
Subchapter 6.6 Prohousing Designation Program requires applicants to confirm that its treatment of encampments on public property complies with and will continue to comply with the constitutional rights of persons experiencing homelessness. An application must include a one-page summary demonstrating how the applicant has enacted best practices in their jurisdiction related to the treatment of unhoused individuals camping on public property , consistent with the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness’ “7 Principles for Addressing Encampments (June 17, 2022). The following template and certification are included to help jurisdictions meet this threshold.
• Principle 1: Estab lished a Cross-Agency, Multi-Sector Response to Encampments – Describe how system partners (name partners) work together to prioritize health and safety both for residents and unsheltered individuals. (350 characters max) The City's existing outreach team, the Community Care Response Team (CCRT), is the key partner in outreach and housing services. CCRT conduct s day-to-day engagement activities and provide linkages to housing resources including rapid re- housing dedicated to Enrollment Resolution Funding (ERF) households and those existing in the community.

CCRT provide s transportation and administrative support for shelter linkages including assessment, payment, and resulting reimbursement. CCRT operates under City Net, who have experience in administering ERF activities. The City's Homeless Assessment Liaison Officers (HALO), Code Enforcement, and Public Works team have also established strong partnerships with each other and the local Caltrans team to coordinate cleanups on state right of ways and other public areas . They are responsible for connections to outreach services and clearing debris and hazardous materials from identified sites. The teams have worked in tandem under the Clean California Act funding to ensure public and state-owned sites remain available and accessible for their intended uses. • Principle 2: Engage Encampment Residents to Develop Solutions – Desc ribe street outreach efforts to engage with encampment residents to find alternative shelter, housing, and service options using the housing first approach before an existing encampment is closed. (350 characters max)
The City offer s person-centered services which includes ensuring that individuals have resources to holistically address their immediate needs as well as their personal and housing goals. Participants engaging in outreach services can choose where, when, and how they interact with case managers and housing navigators. All outreach workers are trained in trauma- informed care and render services that engage rather than penalize participation. A variety of interim shelter options are available to participants including placement at the City's congregate shelter and in non-congregate options available through this proposal and existing partnerships. Participants have a dedicated case manager that navigates them from the encamped site to housing. This includes assessing and enrolling clients into all housing programs in the community, informing them of their potential permanent housing options, and working with the client on the best housing match for them

• Principle 3: Conduct Comprehensive and Coordinated Outreach – De scribe multidisciplinary connection strategies and linkages to resources and permanent housing solutions that is customized to individual needs. If applicable, describe how the jurisdiction uses the coordinated entry system to connect individuals to resources and permanent housing. (350 characters max)
The
City has an existing community outreach service provider to expand capacity to include a new team dedicated solely to individuals displaced by this encampment resolution effort.

Two case managers and two housing navigators work with the population and track their progress through services. As part of ensuring dedicated resources, the City use s Enrollment Resolution Funding ( ERF) funding to include motel voucher options for individuals that prefer non- congregate shelter and Rapid Re -Housing (RRH) to expedite movement into permanent housing. Our current outreach team is experienced with both interventions so interruptions in services to ERF households is expected to be minimal. ERF households are also connected to existing and readily accessible homelessness services in the city including Anaheim -dedicated street medicine and motel rooms funded by California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal (CalAIM), homeless set-aside vouchers from the Anaheim Housing Authority, and set-aside Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) units built under Anaheim's Affordable Housing division.

Outr
each teams utilize the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) as part of this process to track engagement with displaced persons as well as a separate tracker set up to reflect the expectations of the ERF grant to properly track progress of displaced persons. Progress towards goals are marked as displaced persons engage in outreach services including case management and housing navigation; as households enter interim housing throughout the community both funded and not funded by ERF; and are matched to ERF RRH or the variety of permanent housing options available thr ough the County of Orange.

All populations served by ERF are assessed by outreach workers for entry into the local Coordinated Entry System (CES) to ensure all potential housing matches are explored.

Client records are updated in HMIS and outreach teams work with Coordinated Entry to keep records updated so clients do not fall off Coordinated Entry due to inactivity.

Coordinated Entry policies current ly prioritize unsheltered status and length of homelessness for a housing match through CES. Individuals that choose to continue to reside at the encampment site will be more likely to match to a regional housing resource than those that choose to enter shelter or bridge housing as offered as part of this proposal.

While outreach and engagement workers will work in good faith with all people served, they will educate households on their likelihood of a housing match through CES based on housing status, offer the immediate RRH resources linked to ERF as a housing option of choice.
• Principle 4: Address Basic Needs and Provide Storage – Des cribe efforts to meet basic needs, health, safety, and access to storage (timeframes) for people experiencing unsheltered homelessness while creating clear pathways to permanent housing . (350 characters max)
The City has an established protocol for the storage of personal items which includes tagging of items and storage for up to 90 days during which time an individual living unsheltered can ask for repossession of their personal property at any time. All property is properly tagged, documented, and stored by Anaheim Police Department at a location central to the City. When entering shelter or permanent housing, outreach teams work in earnest with households to consolidate their belongings for transport. All other items are marked for disposal by City Public Works in agreement with the household. The City's congregate shelter has storage for personal items in the same area that a household is assigned to sleep in to allow easy access.

As part of Clean California, the City already works with Caltrans on regularly scheduled wast
e removal at sites along State Route 91. Outreach is conducted to individuals occupying the sites days prior to waste removal teams entering the site. Individuals residing at these prioritized encampment areas continue to have access to public facilities at La Palma Park, with the City's Homeless Initiatives team in constant contact with the City Parks Division to help restrooms remain open for public use.
• Principle 5: Ensure Access to Shelter or Housing Options – Describe how low barrier resources to housing and supportive services are communicated to encampment residents.

Include how strategies involve alternative measures to criminalization, focusing on service engagement and harm reduction. (350 characters max)
All pa
rticipants are connected to our local street medicine program, funded by the California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal (CalAIM) and administered by the local managed care plan, to meet physical and mental healthcare needs. All healthcare services have a basis in harm reduction to address the periphery needs of displaced individuals as they seek housing. Throughout a participant's stay in interim housing, harm reduction principles are practiced to ensure programming is responsive to experiences that a participant may have and to minimize the occurrence of unintended harm that could adversely affect their engagement with services. Likewise, permanent housing programs administered by the City and those available through the County practice harm reducti on and utilize methods to improve services that are responsive towards housing placements, lease up, and stability.

Homeless assistant liaison officers (HALO) have trained citywide police patrol and City employees likely to contact people living outside on available resources and protocols for reporting concerns. The City prioritizes sending outreach teams as a first response to calls for homelessness assistance. HALO have also enacted protocols to minimize the number of recorded infractions for people living outside, filing informational reports in their internal law enforcement system rather than issue citations or violations. The compilation of reports allows all patrol units to know individuals are engaging in services or are being assisted by HALO officers and thus reduces the likelihood of the individual being penalized while residing outside. HALO officers also consistently refer suitable candidates to the City's court-diversion program, designed to enroll homeless individuals with a co- occurring substance or mental health condition into a personal wellness plan in lieu of jail time. • Principle 6: Develop Pathways to Permanent Housing and Supports – Describe Housing First strategies emphasizing low barriers, a harm-reduction model, and services to support people obtaining permanent housing more efficiently. Identify efforts to align federal, state, and local funding/programs to provide clear pathways to permanent housing. (350 characters max)
The Ci
ty follows Housing First practices across all of its homelessness and housing programs, recognizing low barrier practices and access to housing help resolve a household's homelessness. Outreach services work with clients on housing navigation wherever they feel most comfortable including from the street or in interim housing. At present, the City's contracted outreach team also has experience working w ith clients as they enter residential treatment programs or other institutions to ensure they remain connected to housing services upon exit. The proposed Encampment Resolution F unding (ERF)-funded Rapid Re- Housing ( RRH) component prioritizes entrance to housing and work towards eliminating barriers to housing. Outreach housing navigators have experience working with households residing outside; navigating and addressing challenges related to credit, sobriety, and documentation from the street and that historically prevented households from successful lease up.

While outreach services are already available to households in the days prior to and after cleanups, additional dedicated teams help provide more personalized case management and housing navigation that will follow them wherever they reside in the City while dedicated RRH resources give households a resource that can more immediately resolve their homelessness. The availability of more robust, dedicated resources also minimizes the number of handoffs for households leading to a greater likelihood of households remaining engaged in services that deter a return to the prioritized sites. • Principle 7: Create a Plan for What Will Happen to Encampment Sites After Closure – D
escribe plans for former encampment spaces (long-term solutions to prevent encampments from reoccurring) . Include efforts to emphasize safety, accessibility, and inclusivity that improve infrastructure. Example: Communities can include curb cuts to increase mobility access and enhanced lighting to encourage safety. (350 characters max) The City of Anaheim uses a coordinated approach to manage former encampment sites and reduce the likelihood of repopulation. Because many encampments are located on or near properties owned by other agencies, the City works closely with partners such as Caltrans, Orange County Public Works, and Union Pacific Railroad to gain access and implement site- specific improvements. On City -owned property that poses an imminent health and safety risk, these may include reinforced fencing, mini -mesh chain link, K -rail, guardrails, cinder block walls, and ground treatments such as rip rap, rock, and gravel. In areas that must remain publicly accessible, such as parks, transit stops, and streets, modifications to landscaping, seating, and structures are made as needed to discourage encampment activity while maintaining access compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

In addi
tion to environmental changes, the City maintains regular outreach and monitoring of known encampment locations. Street outreach teams canvass these areas to offer equitable shelter and services before and after closures that meet the unique needs of individuals encountered. The coordinated clean-ups bring multiple service providers on-site to assist individuals with transportation to shelter, treatment, or recovery housing. The City also conducts joint operations with partner agencies on third-party properties to ensure sites are addressed regularly, and access to services is available, and minimize health and safety risks to encampment site inhabitants.

Cer
tification and Authorization:

Signature of Authorized Representative Date
Appendix 6: Public Participation Checklist
Pursuant to Sections 6601, 6602, and 6605, applicants are required to demonstrate how they have engaged in a “Diligent Public Participation Process.” Please complete this checklist, and sign, to confirm that the applicant has complied with this requirement. Attach and reference any comments you received during the process.

Regulation Text Explanation Yes No
Outreach through a
variety of methods and
languages to ensure
access to the public
process and provide
opportunities for public
input.

The City of Anaheim conducted outreach using a
variety of methods and languages to ensure broad
public awareness and participation. Building on the
City’s extensive Housing Element outreach
program, the City utilized a combination of digital
and in-person engagement tools, including a
dedicated project website, email notifications,
social media postings, public notices, and
distribution of flyers at community locations.

Outreach materials and meetings were provided in
English and Spanish, with additional language
support available upon request. These efforts
reflect Anaheim’s established multilingual
engagement practices used during the Housing
Element process, which included bilingual
workshops and materials to reach a diverse
population.

For the Prohousing Designation Application, the
City re-engaged stakeholders through targeted
email notifications, public meeting announcements,
and online access to draft materials, ensuring
continued access to the public process.
☒
☐
Specific effort to engage
all segments of the
community, including
individuals or
representatives of lower-
income and special
needs households, for-
profit and non-profit
developers, and special
needs service providers.

The City made a concerted effort to engage all
segments of the community, including lower-
income households, Environmental Justice (EJ)
communities, special needs populations,
developers, and housing service providers. This
effort builds upon the City’s Housing Element
outreach program, which included a Housing
Element Update Committee (HEUC), technical
focus groups, and stakeholder interviews involving
housing advocates, community organizations,
major employers, and real estate professionals.

Additionally, the City’s Environmental Justice
Element identifies disadvantaged communities
based on CalEnviroScreen and prioritized
engagement with populations experiencing higher
☒ ☐
pollution burdens, housing cost burdens, and
linguistic isolation. The Prohousing outreach
process incorporated these findings by focusing
outreach efforts on these communities and
leveraging existing stakeholder networks to ensure
meaningful participation.

Availability of the draft
document to the public,
including notification to
interested parties and all
segments of the
community, for thirty (30)
calendar days and
subsequent versions for
seven (7) calendar days.

The draft Prohousing Designation Application was
made available to the public for review via the
City’s website and through direct notification to
stakeholders and interested parties. The City
provided a public review period consistent with
State requirements, modeled after the Housing
Element process, which included a 30-day public
review period followed by a minimum 7-day review
period for any revised draft prior to final
consideration.

The City collected public comments through
multiple channels, including email, online
submissions, and public meetings which occurred
during the Housing Element and Environmental
Justice draft and adoption processes, and ensured
that updated materials were made accessible to
the public throughout the process.
☒
☐
Public hearings and
informative meetings.

The City conducted public meetings to inform the
community about efforts to increase the availability
of affordable housing during the Housing Element
and Environmental Justice draft and adoption
process and included the comments and findings
in the Prohousing Designation Application which
was made available on the city’s website with
targeted email notification to Housing Element and
Environmental Justice Element stakeholders to
provide opportunities for public input. These efforts
build on Anaheim’s established practice of
conducting public workshops, Planning
Commission meetings, and City Council hearings
as part of the Housing Element process, where
community members were invited to provide input
and comment on policy direction and draft
documents.

For the Prohousing Designation Application, the
City presented the application to the City Council,
providing an opportunity for public comment prior
to submittal.
☒
☐
Consideration of
comments, including
incorporation of
comments into a
jurisdiction's application
and Prohousing Policies
as appropriate.

The City documented and considered all
comments received during the public review
process. Public input was collected through
meetings, written submissions, and prior Housing
Element engagement activities. Consistent with
past practice, all comments were reviewed,
summarized, and provided to decision-makers,
including the City Council, as part of the
consideration process.

Where appropriate, comments were incorporated
into the Prohousing Designation Application. For
comments not incorporated, the City provided
explanations to ensure transparency and
accountability in the decision-making process.
☒
☐
Cer
tification and Authorization:

Signature of Authorized Representative Date
Diligent Public Participation Process Summary
City of Anaheim Prohousing Designation Application
The City of Anaheim’s public outreach strategy for the Proh ousing Designation Application is grounded in a comprehensive, multi-year engagement program conducted as part of the Sixth Cycle Housing Element and Environmental Justice (EJ) Element. This effort included community workshops, stakeholder committees, technical focus groups, public surveys, and public hearings, engaging a broad cross-section of Anaheim residents and stakeholders.

Through this process, the City established a strong foundation of community input regarding housing needs, barriers to development, affordability challenges, and programs to enhance equitable access to housing. Outreach efforts were conducted in English and Spanish and were designed to reach diverse populations, including lower -income households, renters, and underrepresented communities.

The adoption of the City’s Environmental Justice Element further strengthened this foundation by identifying disadvantaged communities using CalEnviroScreen and highlighting areas with higher pollution burden, housing cost burden, and linguistic isolation. These findings informed a targeted outreach approach for the Prohousing Application, ensuring that engagement efforts prioritized communities most impacted by housing challenges.

Building on this established framework, the prohousing outreach effort focused on re-engaging stakeholders and providing meaningful opportunities for public review and input. The City made the draft application publicly available through its website and distributed notifications through established stakeholder lists, including participants from the Housing Element process, community organizations, and development stakeholders.

The City made the Prohousing Designation Application available on the City website for public review, explaining its purpose and benefits, and soliciting public feedback. Additional input was collected through direct stakeholder outreach. Consistent with State requirements, the City provided a public review period of 30 days and made revised materials available prior to final consideration.

All comments received were documented, reviewed, and considered in the preparation of the final application. Where appropriate, feedback was incorporated into the City’s prohousing policies and implementation approach.

Overall, Anaheim’s outreach strategy demonstrates a diligent, inclusive, and iterative public participation process that builds upon extensive prior engagement and ensures that the Prohousing Designation Application reflects community input, equity considerations, and local housing priorities.

Appendix 7: Additional Information and Supporting Documentation This documentation demonstrates the City of Anaheim’s implementation of prohousing policies through housing production, financial investment, regulatory alignment, and interagency coordination. Each item is cross-referenced to applicable prohousing scoring categories.

A. Demonstrated Housing Production & Outcomes
A-1. Affordable Housing Development Overview (2023)
Scoring Alignment:

Category 4 (General – Demonstrated Outcomes & Implementation Capacity) Supports AFFH / Equity Distribution (Program Intent)
Description: Comprehensive overview of existing and proposed affordable housing developments across Anaheim, including unit counts by type (family, senior, permanent supportive housing, and special needs).

Purpose: Demonstrates the City’s ability to implement Prohousing policies at scale and deliver housing across income levels and populations.

Key Highlight: The City has facilitated development of 4,572 affordable units citywide, including permanent supportive housing and special needs housing (see summary table on page 2).

B. F
inancial Incentives, Partnerships & Project Delivery
B-1. HOME Fund Midway Project
(Includes Cooperation Agreement, Staff Report, and Funding Materials) Scoring Alignment:

Category 4A – Local Financial Assistance
Category 4B – Leveraged/External Funding (Regional/State/Federal) Category 3A – Fee Reductions/Deferrals
Category 2C – Streamlined Project Facilitation (implementation evidence) Description: Consolidated materials documenting City and Housing Authority participation in financing and facilitating the Midway Affordable Apartments project.

Purpose: Provides comprehensive evidence of real-world implementation, including:
• Direct City subsidy (HOME funds, Housing Asset Funds) • Fee deferrals (parks and transportation)
• Ground lease/public land contribution
• Leveraged funding (tax credits, private financing, Housing Trust Fund) • Streamlined CEQA clearance (infill/program EIR reliance) Key Highlights:
• 86-unit, 100% affordable project serving extremely low -, very low -, and low -income households
• $3.04M HOME funds + $1.96M local housing funds + land value contribution • Fee deferrals and Section 8 PBV support
• CEQA streamlined through Program EIR consistency (no additional environmental review required)
C. P
olicy Commitment & Regulatory Framework
C-1. Affordable Housing Policy Resolution (2018)
Scoring Alignment:

Category 4M – Local Policies Supporting Affordable Housing Production Category 3A – Incentives (Fee Deferral/Waiver Framework) Category 2 (General – Regulatory Alignment with State Law) Description: City Council resolution establishing affordable housing as a City priority and outlining strategies to increase supply.

Purpose: Provides formal policy basis for regulatory relief, incentives, and housing partnerships.

Key Highlights:
• Identifies significant RHNA shortfall and unmet need
• Supports expedited processing, fee deferrals/waivers, and regulatory flexibility (see policy discussion on page 3)
• Encourages partnerships and developer engagement to deliver affordable units C-2. Wat
er Priority Resolution (SB 1087 Implementation)
Scoring Alignment:

Category 2F – Infrastructure Prioritization
Category 2N – Other Regulatory Incentives Supporting Housing Production Description: Resolution prioritizing water service allocation for developments that meet lower - income housing needs.

Purpose: Demonstrates implementation of State housing law (SB 1087/Gov. Code §65589.7) and prioritization of infrastructure resources for qualifying housing developments.

Key Highlight: Establishes priority access to water service for projects addressing lower-income RHNA needs, ensuring infrastructure does not constrain housing production.

D. S
upplemental Implementation Evidence
D-1. Anaheim Housing Authority Resolution AHA2021-003
Scoring Alignment:

Category 4A – Financial Assistance (Supplemental Evidence) Category 4I – Public Agency Participation
Description: Resolution approving the preliminary award and agreements supporting the Midway affordable housing project.

Purpose: Confirms formal Housing Authority action and commitment to project funding and implementation.

Key Highlight: Authorizes execution of agreements and funding necessary to advance an 86- unit affordable housing development on publicly controlled land (see resolution text, page 1).

Appendix B
Adequate Sites Analysis

ATTACHMENT
1A & 4E
(APPENDIX 3)
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-2

1. Adequate Sites Analysis Background
State law requires each city and county to identify adequate sites, by income category, to meet its Regional Housing Need Assessment (RHNA) allocation.

The City of Anaheim plans to meet its 2021-2029 RHNA need by income category through the identification of adequate sites and related Policies and Programs detailed in this Housing Element. This appendix includes details on the sites determined to meet the City’s RHNA, which include:
• Submitted Development Applications known as “Projects in the Pipeline”; • Anticipated development of accessory dwelling units (ADU) with regional affordability assumptions developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD); and • Candidate Sites, as described in the categories below. o Sites within existing zones, overlay zones, or specific plan development areas that permit development of housing;
o Sites within the proposed Center City Corridors (C3) Implementation Plan that are anticipated to accommodate housing developments (subject to the approval of the C3 Implementation Plan and any associated General Plan Amendments);
o Sites designated for residential land use by the General Plan that require a proposed addition of the Residential Opportunity (RO) or Mixed -Use (MU) Overlay Zone in order to streamline the development of housing;
o Sites requiring a change in General Plan Land Use and Zoning designations, in order to permit development of housing; and
o Sites owned by the Anaheim Housing Authority and Successor Agency.

Table B -1: Summary of Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Allocation and Adequate Sites Analysis provides a summary of the City’s RHNA allocation and types of sites projected to meet the housing need for each income category. Table B-1 displays the following Income Categories:

Lower Income: Table B-1 combines the Very Low Income and Low Income categories of the RHNA allocated units into “Lower Income” for Projected ADU and Candidate Sites because the development requirements for these units are consistent. State law considers any Candidate Site that has a permitted density of 30 or more dwelling units per acre and is between 0.5 and 10 acres to be suitable to develop units for Lower Income Households. However, although the City can count all sites that allow 30 or more dwelling units per acre within the Lower Income category, the City has elected to include sites that allow 60 or more dwelling units per acre in the Moderate Income category. The City does not currently have any Lower Income units built at this higher density range of 60 dwelling units per acre and therefore, thought it would be more appropriate to place these units in the Moderate Income category. Therefore, the Lower Income category Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-3
only include sites that allow 30 or more dwelling units per acre, but less than 60 dwelling units/acre. The Extremely Low Income category is a subset of the Very Low Income category and represents 50 percent of the Very Low Income RHNA Allocation.
• Moderate Income: The City considers any Candidate Site that has a permitted density of 18 or more dwelling units per acre suitable to develop units for Moderate Income Households. In addition, although stated above and pursuant to State law, the City can count all sites that allow 30 or more dwelling units per acre within the Lower -Income category, the City has elected to include sites the permit up to 60 dwelling units per acre in the Moderate Income category, consistent with market realities.
• Above Moderate Income: Any site that permits fewer than 18 dwelling units per acre or is a Pipeline Project that is not proposing to provide any income-restricted units, is included in the Above Moderate Income category.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-4
Table B-1: Summary of Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Allocation and Adequate Sites Analysis Extremely Low
Income
Very Low/ Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income Total
RHNA (2021-2029) 1,884 4,280 2,945 8,344 17,453
Units within Pipeline Projects
Pipeline Projects (Table B-2) 118 216 91 6,106 6,531
Projected Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Construction
Lower Income Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income Total
Projected ADU Construction 514 227 15 756
Projected Dwelling Units on Candidate Sites (Table B-10) Unit Capacity: Citywide
No Proposed Change in General Plan
Land Use Designation
No Proposed Change in Zoning
557 5,319 108 5,984
Unit Capacity: Citywide
No Proposed Change in General Plan
Land Use Designation
Proposed Change in Zoning to
Residential Opportunity or Mixed Use
Overlay Zone
93 2,408 517 3,018
Unit Capacity: Citywide
Proposed Change in General Plan Land
Use Designation
Proposed Change in Zoning
6,838 0 480 7,318
Unit Capacity: Citywide
Housing Authority and Successor
Agency Sites
98 286 8 392
Unit Capacity: Center City
Corridors (C3)Implementation
Plan
No Proposed Change in General Plan
Land Use Designation
Proposed Change in Zoning to C3
Specific Plan
0 1,157 661 1,818
Unit Capacity: Center City
Corridors (C3) Implementation
Plan
Proposed Change in General Plan Land
Use Designation
Proposed Change in Zoning to C3
Specific Plan
171 844 903 1,918
Total on Candidate Sites 7,757 10,014 2,677 20,448
Total Summary
RHNA (2021-2029) 6,164 2,945 8,344 17,453
Total Units: Pipeline Projects,
ADU, and Candidate Sites 8,605 10,332 8,798 27,735
Total Unit Capacity Over
RHNA 2,441 7,387 454 10,282
Percentage of Unit Surplus 40% 251% 5% 59%
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-5

2. Pipeline Projects
Pipeline projects are indicators of the future development of housing throughout the City, based upon property owner/developer interest. Since the start of the projection period for the Sixth Cycle Planning Period (June 30, 2021), the City has multiple projects in different stages of the pipeline. These stages include:
• Application Stage
• Conceptual Development Review Application: an applicant has submitted a housing project for Conceptual Development Review Application, which may be followed by the submittal of a Development Application
• Development Application: the property owner has submitted a Development Application that is in process but not yet approved
• Approved Entitlements: The Development Application that has approved for the site, but the City has not issued building permits as of June 30, 2021
• Under Construction: The City has issued building permits, but it is not yet constructed, as of June 30, 2021
There are many factors that may affect t he status and anticipated completion of pipeline projects . The City works with applicants to ensure compliance with all relevant requirements and tries to streamline the process wherever possible. When selecting adequate sites to accommodate the City’s RHNA, considerations were taken to determine that sites would become available during the planning period.

While anticipated completion dates, planning horizons, and development phasing are dependent on the applicant, the City is confident that pipeline projects will reach the construction phase and become available during the planning period. This assumption is b ased on market trends, past development examples, and applicant interest. Additionally, pipeline projects in the pre -application stage have been analyzed against any known barriers to development and only those without barriers or constraints were selected.

During the drafting of the Sixth Cycle Housing Element, the City has seen projects go from the conceptual phase all the way to the construction phase. The table below has been updated according to the most up- to-date statuses of projects. In Anaheim, p re-application meetings are encouraged and sometimes required in order to ensure applicants understand the City’s requirements. These meetings also increase approval certainty and increase the likelihood that proposed developments reach the construction phase.

Based on past experience , the City has seen that a pplicants who request pre-application meetings and those who are required to, typically submit a formal application. Of those that reach the application phase, it is very uncommon that applicants do not receive entitlement approvals. The City is confident in assessing that applicants who go through the pre-application process and submit applications will typically receive entitlements and ultimately reach the construction phase. The City believes this general trend will also be true for all pipeline projects selected in Table B-2.

For larger projects such as OC Vibe and A-Town Development Areas C and D, applicants have been coordinating with the City and intend to develop within the planning period. The OC Vibe project which will bring 1,500 units, 900 of which will be developed during the planning period, is beginning construction in mid to late 2023.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-6
In the Fifth Cycle Housing Element, the City included pipeline projects totaling 4,282 units. Of all of the projects included as pipeline projects, only one project, totaling 525 units, did not move forward to construction and entitlements have lapsed. The remaining projects have been completed or are currently under construction to be completed in the 6th Cycle planning period.

Table B-2: Pipeline Projects provides a detailed list of pipeline projects in Anaheim.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-7
Table B-2: Pipeline Projects
Unique
ID APN(s) Status as of 12-8-21 Acres Project Name Address Zoning Maximum Density Allowed
Percentage of
Maximum Density
Allowed
Description
Extremely
Low Income
Units
Low
Income
Units
Moderate
Income
Units
Above
Moderate
Income Units
Total
Units Affordability Assumption
P-3 25503201 Approved 0.15 Carleton
Apartments 114 N Carleton Ave RM-4 36 DU/Acre 80% 4-unit multiple-family residential development 0 0 0 4 4 Market Rate
P-5
27107107,
27107108,
27107110
Under Construction 0.68 Anaheim B - 31
Townhomes 1075 N Harbor Blvd C-G
31-unit attached single-
family residential
development
0 0 0 31 31 Market Rate
P-6
25009109,
25009110,
25009111
Under construction 5.30 1600 W Lincoln
Avenue Apartments 1600 W Lincoln Ave C-G (MU) 60 DU/Acre 99% 315-unit mixed-use
development with 3,413
square-foot retail space.
0 0 0 315 315 Market Rate
P-7
03625108
,03625136,
03625134,
03625128,
03625126,
03625132,
03625124,
03625130
Development Application 0.46 625 S Illinois Street 625 S Illinois St RS-2 6 DU/Acre 109% 3-lot single-family residential development 0 0 0 3 3 Market Rate
P-8 03501051 Approved 4.48 The Invitation 1122 N Anaheim Blvd I (MU) 60 DU/Acre 100% 269-unit multiple-family residential development 0 0 0 269 269 Market Rate
P-9
08218501,
08218552,
08218553,
08218547,
08218548,
08218559, +
Under Construction 2.26 Anaheim Midway 110 W Midway Dr I 86-unit multiple-family residential development. 28 57 0 1 86
Method of Affordability:

Density Bonus Agreement
& Affordable Housing
Covenant
P-10
07111040,
07111028,
07111041
Approved 2.85 Parkgate Center 2301-2331 W Lincoln
Ave RM-3 18 DU/Acre 94%
48-unit attached and
detached single family
residential development
0 0 0 48 48 Market Rate
P-11 12707101,
12707107 Development Application 0.70 Linbrook Villas 2280 W Lincoln Ave T 12-unit multiple-family residential development 0 0 0 12 12 Market Rate
P-13 07241701 Development Application 0.44 2 Custom Homes Development 1204 N Brookhurst St RS-2 6 DU/Acre 152%
2-lot single-family
residential development
with an ADU on each lot
0 0 0 4 4 Market Rate
P-14 03535051 Under Construction 0.56 Lincoln Apartments 1221 E Lincoln Ave RM-4 36 DU/Acre 94% 19-unit multiple-family residential development 0 0 0 19 19 Market Rate
P-15 07988238 Conceptual 0.7 850 Western Ave 850 S Western Ave RS-2 6 DU/Acre 100% 2-lot single-family residential development 0 0 0 2 2 Market Rate
P-17 07988237,
07988236 Approved 1.39 Pepperwood Place 910 S Western Ave RS-4 12-lot single family residential development 0 0 0 12 12 Market Rate
P-19 13446137 Conceptual 0.68 Mungall
Apartments 3701 W Mungall Dr RM-4 36 DU/Acre 98% 24-unit multiple-family residential development. 0 0 0 24 24 Market Rate
P-20 36322102 Development Application 3.48 145 S Vista Grande 145 S Vista Grande T 2-lot single-family residential development 0 0 0 1 1 Market Rate
P-21
08327075,
08327069,
08327067,
08327073,
08327074,
08327051,
08327077
Approved 10.84 LT Platinum Center 2040 S State College
Blvd I
405-unit mixed-use
development with
583,000 gross square feet
of commercial uses, a
200-room hotel, and
77,000 gross square feet
of office.
0 0 0 405 405 Market Rate
P-22 07988234 Approved 0.36 Ball and Western
Apartments 3175 W Ball Rd RM-4 36 DU/Acre 85% 11-unit multiple-family residential development 0 0 0 11 11 Market Rate
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-8
Table B-2: Pipeline Projects
Unique
ID APN(s) Status as of 12-8-21 Acres Project Name Address Zoning Maximum Density Allowed
Percentage of
Maximum Density
Allowed
Description
Extremely
Low Income
Units
Low
Income
Units
Moderate
Income
Units
Above
Moderate
Income Units
Total
Units Affordability Assumption
P-23 12660204 Approved 1.80 39 Commons Beach
II - Rental 212 S Beach Blvd SP 2017-1
100-unit multiple-family
development (processed
in conjunction with P-27)
20 79 0 1 100
Method of Affordability:

Density Bonus Agreement
& Affordable Housing
Covenant
P-24 12723149 Development Application 0.94 Orange Avenue - 8 Units
9812 W Orange Ave
(Unincorporated) RS-3 8 DU/Acre 106% 8-lot single family residential development 0 0 0 8 8 Market Rate
P-25
08246135,
08246134,
08246124,
08246125,
08246139,
08246123,
08246131
Development Application 10.34
SEC Ball and
Anaheim Mixed
Use
1200-1354 S Anaheim
Blvd and 200 E Ball
Rd
C-G
159-unit mixed use
development with 182-
room hotel and 6,000
square feet of retail
0 0 16 143 159
Method of Affordability:

Density Bonus Agreement
& Affordable Housing
Covenant
P-28 25010108,
25010109 Development Application 0.78
Anaheim A -
Broadway
Townhomes
1661 W Broadway RM-3.5 27 DU/Acre 161%
34-unit single-family
attached residential
development
0 0 0 34 34 Market Rate
P-29 03702123 Development Application 0.59 Broadway Tower Apartments 122 W Broadway C-G
36-unit mixed use
development with 667
square feet of retail
0 0 0 36 36 Market Rate
P-31 12921230 Development Application 0.79 1625 W Cerritos 4- Lot Subdivision 1625 W Cerritos Ave RS-2 6 DU/Acre 105% 4-lot single family
residential development
with one ADU
0 0 0 5 5 Market Rate
P-32 08216011* Under Construction 0.61 Center of Hope 1340 Lewis St I 72-unit permanent
supportive housing
development
70 0 0 2 72
Method of Affordability:

Affordable Housing
Covenant
P-33 12705143 Under Construction 6.49 Townes at
Broadway 2323 W Broadway RM-3 18 DU/Acre 96%
112-unit attached single
family residential
development
0 0 0 112 112 Market Rate
P-34 03702411 Conceptual 2.02 Lumberyards 275 E Santa Ana St I 56 unit attached single-
family residential
development
0 0 0 56 56 Market Rate
P-36
08218528,
08218527,
08218531,
08218526,
08218529,
08218530,
08218551,
08218539,
08218541,
08218540,
08218535,
08218558. +
Under Construction 6.4 Legacy Anaheim 200 W Midway Dr T 156-unit attached single-
family residential
development
0 0 0 156 156 Market Rate
P-37 25803105* Under Construction 3.63
39 Commons - NEC
Beach Blvd/Lincoln
Ave
208-224 N Beach Blvd SP 2017-1
65-unit attached single-
family residential
development
0 0 0 65 65 Market Rate
P-38 35627104 Development Application 4.19 Rio Grande
Subdivision 6268 E Rio Grande Dr RH-2 1 DU/Acre 95% 4-lot single family residential development 0 0 0 4 4 Market Rate
P-41 36121168 Development Application 4.58 VYAS Development 860 S Peralta Hills Dr RH-1 1 DU/Acre 100% 3 lot single-family residential development 0 0 0 3 3 Market Rate
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-9
Table B-2: Pipeline Projects
Unique
ID APN(s) Status as of 12-8-21 Acres Project Name Address Zoning Maximum Density Allowed
Percentage of
Maximum Density
Allowed
Description
Extremely
Low Income
Units
Low
Income
Units
Moderate
Income
Units
Above
Moderate
Income Units
Total
Units Affordability Assumption
P-42 12810108 Development Application 0.92 Tinh Homes 1767 W Orange Ave T 6-lot single-family residential development 0 0 0 8 8 Market Rate
P-44 34352203 Approved 0.44 Short Street Parcel
Map 5055 E Short St RS-3 8 DU/Acre 114% 4-lot single-family residential development 0 0 0 4 4 Market Rate
P-45 07211021,
07211050, + Approved 7.17 Lincoln at Euclid 1631-1667 W Lincoln Ave RM-3.5 27 DU/Acre 60%
115-unit single family
attached residential
development
0 0 0 115 115 Market Rate
P-47 03603144 Approved 0.4 Walnut Parcel Map 201 S Walnut St RS-2 6 DU/Acre 83% 2-lot single-family residential development 0 0 0 2 2 Market Rate
P-48 03611203,
03611232 Development Application 0.55 Lincoln Colony
Apartments
898-914 W Lincoln
Ave C-G 43-unit multiple-family
residential development 0 0 0 43 43 Market Rate
P-50 23212136 Under Construction 4.49
A-Town
Development Area
H
1430 E Triad St T
84-unit attached single-
family residential
development
0 0 0 84 84 Market Rate
P-51 23212130 Development Application 3.3
A-Town
Development Area
B
1332-1338 E Katella
Ave I (PTMU) 85 DU/Acre 96%
270-unit mixed-use
development with 21,615
square feet of ground-
floor commercial uses
0 0 0 270 270 Market Rate
P-52 23212134 Development Application 0.23
A-Town
Development Area
F
Tract 17703 I 73-unit multiple-family
residential development 0 0 0 73 73 Market Rate
P-53 23212135 Under Construction 5.37
A-Town
Development Area
G
1589 E Gene Autry
Way I 154-unit multiple-family
residential development 0 0 0 154 154 Market Rate
P-54 12921223 Approved 0.51 Ryan Homes 1679 W Cerritos Ave RS-4 3-lot single-family residential development 0 0 0 3 3 Market Rate
P-55 12624217,
12624218 Approved 0.423 807 S Dale 807-807 1/2 S Dale
Ave RS-2 6 DU/Acre 100% 2-lot single family
residential development 0 0 0 2 2 Market Rate
P-56 08329303,
08329305 Under Construction 17.57 Jefferson Stadium
Park Final Phase 1912 S Jacaranda St I
332-unit mixed use
development with 14,504
square feet of retail space
0 0 0 332 332 Market Rate
P-58 03702201 Under Construction 0.58 Lemon Street
Industrial 400 S Lemon St I
1-unit (caretakers unit) in
a 7,239 square foot
industrial building
0 0 0 1 1 Market Rate
P-59
34518125,
34518126,
34518127, +
Approved 9.4 Link OC 1011-1091 N Tustin
Ave SP 2015-1
406-unit mixed use
development with 5,000
square feet of new
commercial space
0 0 0 406 406 Market Rate
P-60 07016116* Under Construction 3.83
Melia Homes
(Victory Baptist
Church)
227 N Magnolia Ave RM-3 18 DU/Acre 86%
59-units attached single-
family residential
development
0 0 6 53 59 Market Rate
P-61
03619148,
03619249,
03619255,
03619247,
03619257,
03619250,
03619253
Approved 11.32 BARN 350 W Center Street
Promenade O-L
57-unit mixed-use project
with 16,500 square feet
of commercial and office
space
0 0 0 57 57 Market Rate
P-63 23212133 Development Application 3.1
A-Town
Development Area
E
1825-1845 S State
College Blvd I 257 multiple-family
residential units 0 0 0 257 257 Market Rate
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-10
Table B-2: Pipeline Projects
Unique
ID APN(s) Status as of 12-8-21 Acres Project Name Address Zoning Maximum Density Allowed
Percentage of
Maximum Density
Allowed
Description
Extremely
Low Income
Units
Low
Income
Units
Moderate
Income
Units
Above
Moderate
Income Units
Total
Units Affordability Assumption
P-65 08221403,
08221405 Under Construction 11.87 Avanti Anaheim
Boulevard 100 W Cerritos Ave RM-3.5 27 DU/Acre 91% 292 attached single-family residential units 0 0 30 262 292 Method of Affordability:

Density Bonus Agreement
P-66
38652114,
38652117,
25352117,
25360103,
25352129,
25352131,
25352130,
25360104,
25359101,
25352132,
23207102,
38652116,
38652120,
23207209,
23207208,
23207103,
23207206,
25360102,
25352134,
25352135,
25352137,
25352133,
23207207*,
37531127*,
25352136*
Approved, Breaking
Ground late 2023 95 OC Vibe 2695 E Katella Ave PR
1500-unit mixed use
development around and
including Honda Center
and ARTIC
0 80 37 783 900
Method of Affordability:

Development Agreement,
Density Bonus Agreement
& Affordable Housing
Covenant
P-67 25508117 Completed 4.40 Alexan Center City 255 N Anaheim Blvd C-G 11-units conversion of
11,136 square feet of
commercial space to 11
live/work units in an
existing mixed-use
development.
0 0 0 11 11 Market Rate
P-69 26715134 Under Construction 7.00 La Palma Village
1110-1116 N
Anaheim Blvd and
115-125 W La Palma
Ave
I
New 152 unit residential
subdivision and 10 unit
residential subdivision
with 922 square feet of
ground floor commercial
space
0 0 0 162 162 Market Rate
P-70
35445117,
35445119,
35445131,
35445132,
35445133*
Development Application 16.70
Anaheim Hills
Festival Shopping
Center
8020 E Santa Ana
Canyon Rd SP 90-1 600-unit multiple-family
residential development 0 0 0 600 600 Market Rate
P-71 08373118,
08373119 Conceptual 4.01 Sunkist Lincoln
Townhomes 2420 E Lincoln Ave C-G
86-unit single family
attached residential
development
0 0 0 86 86 Market Rate
P-72 07074101 Development Application 0.93 1442 N Dale Ave 1442 N Dale Ave T 18-unit single family
attached residential
development
0 0 2 16 18 Method of Affordability:

Density Bonus Agreement
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-11
Table B-2: Pipeline Projects
Unique
ID APN(s) Status as of 12-8-21 Acres Project Name Address Zoning Maximum Density Allowed
Percentage of
Maximum Density
Allowed
Description
Extremely
Low Income
Units
Low
Income
Units
Moderate
Income
Units
Above
Moderate
Income Units
Total
Units Affordability Assumption
P-73 23212131,
23212132 Under Construction 6.51
Remainder
DAG2008-00006 (A-
Town Development
Areas C and D)
23212131, 23212132 I (PTMU) 85 DU/Acre 92% Up to 508 dwelling units 0 0 0 508 508 Market Rate P-74 12710221* Development Application 1.25 Melia Homes (Faith Lutheran Church) 2219 W Orange Ave T
24-unit single family
attached residential
development
0 0 0 24 24 Market Rate
P-80
07114138,
07114120,
07114136,
07114146
Conceptual 0.51 Moro Place 2365 W Moro Pl RS-2 6 DU/Acre 163% 3-lot single-family residential development 0 0 0 5 5 Market Rate
Totals: 118 216 91 6,106 6,531
Note: The following Pipeline Projects were deleted based on no or low probability to develop within Sixth Cycle or as originally proposed:

P-12: 3360 W Lincoln Ave for 235 total units
P-27: Beach / Lincoln for 134 total units
P-30: 1171 N West St for 157 total units
P-35: 7788 E Santa Ana Canyon Rd for 513 total units
P-39: 1200-1204 S Phoenix Club Dr for 1320 total units
P-57: Deepark Dr / Antler Ct for 35 total units
P-68: 2000 E Gene Autry Way for 5175 total units

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-12

3. Accessory Dwelling Units
Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) are housing units, which property owners may develop in addition to an existing single- or multiple-family residential use. These housing units can be freestanding or attached to a primary structure and provide additional housing on an existing residential lot. Often ADUs provide housing for family members or the property owners rent these units to members of the community. In accordance with State law, the City allows ADUs in all zones that allow for single -family dwelling or multiple-family dwelling unit development. The City only permits Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) in single-family dwelling unit zones.

The City of Anaheim has determined, based on past performance, that it is appropriate to anticipate the development of 756 accessory dwelling units from 2021 to 2029. During 2021, the City has received 216 ADU building permit applications and has issued 158 , which is more than four times the total of ADUs permitted in 2019 and almost double the amount permitted in 2020 . This provides for a solid indication that the ADU production has been consistently increasing in the City. However, these extra units are not reflected in this analysis in order to maintain a conservative estimate for ADU production during the planning period. Table B-3 below displays the calculation and estimated projection for the 8-year planning period. The basis for these assumptions is the following calculations:
• The average number of ADUs permitted between 2018 to 2020 (42 units) • Double the average (84 units) to reflect the ADU growth that the City can reasonably expect, in consideration of new state legislation and policy considerations • Extrapolate this average over the 8-year projection period Table B-3: Accessory Dwelling Unit Assumptions
Year ADU Permitted
Projection Period Total: 756 units
2029 (projected) 84 units
2028 (projected) 84 units
2027 (projected) 84 units
2026 (projected) 84 units
2025 (projected) 84 units
2024 (projected) 84 units
2023 (projected) 84 units
2022 (projected) 84 units
2021 (actual)1 158 units
2020 (actual) 90 units
2019 (actual) 32 units
2018 (actual) 4 units
1From January 1, 2021-December 2021, the City issued building permits for 158 ADUs.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-13
For the purposes of this projection exercise, the City assumes a percentage of ADUs to be consistent with Affordability Assumptions produced by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The SCAG conducted analysis consists of the following steps:
• Calculating maximum rent limits for RHNA income categories for one-person and two person households by county
• Conduct survey of rents for ADUs in the SCAG region
• Use survey data to determine proportion of ADUs within each income category • Create assumption of how many persons will occupy each ADU, finalize proportions Using the proportions SCAG created for Orange County, the City has allocated the following ADUs for each income category:

Table B-4: Accessory Dwelling Unit Projections by Income Category Income Category Percent of Total Units Units
Very Low Income 25% 189 units
Low Income 43% 325 units
Moderate Income 30% 227 units
Above Moderate Income 2% 15 units
Total 756 units
The City has developed Housing Production Strategies (see Section 4: Housing Policy Plan) in support of the above projections, to facilitate the development of ADUs available for lower income households.

4. Candidate Sites
This section contains a description and listing of the candidate sites identified to meet RHNA need as of August 2021 and includes a surplus of assumed units 60 percent over RHNA to respond to changing market conditions and projects that may develop other than as assumed . Table B-10 provides a full list of these sites. The City of Anaheim has identified sites with capacity to accommodate the City’s 2021-2029 RHNA using existing residentially zone land and that will require a General Plan Amendment or Rezone. The City identified land to accommodate the RHNA based on the following criteria:
• Selected sites are between half of an acre and ten acres; • Selected sites currently permit residential development or are identified for General Plan Amendment or Rezone to permit Housing at an appropriate density identified below by income category pursuant to Government Code Section 65583.2(c)(3)(B)(iv). This Code Section permits a jurisdiction within a metropolitan county, such as Orange County, to count units on sites that allow a minimum of 30 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) as appropriate for accommodating lower income households. However, in that the City has not had any Low or Very Low Income Housing developed at a density of 60 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) or greater, it has elected to identify sites that permit a density of 60 du/ac as appropriate for accommodating Moderate Income housing:
o Low and Very Low Income
▪ An assumed density of at least 30 du/ac and less than 60 du/ac o Moderate Income
▪ An assumed density of at least 18 du/ac and less than 30 du/ac OR Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-14
▪ An assumed density of at least 60 du/ac
o Above Moderate Income
▪ An assumed density of less than 18 du/ac
• Selected sites are also near essential resources such as transportation routes, schools, and grocery markets to further fair housing opportunities. By selecting sites near these valuable resources, residents of Anaheim would be given more opportunity to live in areas with better resources, which would in turn improve the quality of life of all residents. • Figure B-6: Candidate Sites Inventory District 1 through • Figure B -11: Candidate Sites Inventory District 6 show all sites that the City has identified to accommodate its RHNA allocation.

Capacity Calculations
The City utilized the following capacity calculation on parcels identified to accommodate RHNA units:
• The City identified the net available land of each parcels for development opportunity; • The City assumed a conservative 80 percent of the maximum density permitted on each parcel including for parcels which also permit 100 percent nonresidential uses and mixed use. The assumed development potential of 80 percent of the maximum density permitted in respective zones is a conservative assumption based on the City’s past development. As shown in Tables B - 2 and B-5, residential developments in the City often exceed maximum densities allowed in their respective zones. Applicants in the City most commonly develop up to maximum densities to maximize a property’s development capacity and developers rarely propose housing at densities below 80 percent of the maximum allowed. To account for the range in densities developed, the City estimates that an 80 percent assumption of the maximum density permitted is significantly lower than the true estimate but is confident that the assumption can account for the rare cases when developments do not achieve or exceed maximum densities. Table B-5 provides examples of past development in the City and shows that reside ntial density is maximized on mixed -use parcels, even when commercial is also constructed on site, and developments rarely develop under 80 percent of maximum densities allowed.
• The assumed density of 60 du per acre is associated with a mixed -use land use that permits dwellings-multiple family and/or dwellings -single-family attached as a primary use, with or without a nonresidential use. Table B-5 provides examples of past development in the City and shows that residential density is maximized on mixed-use parcels, even when commercial is also constructed on site . Additionally, virtually all recent residential development in the City has occurred on infill sites which transitioned from nonresidential to residential; • Based on this assumed density, the City calculated each identified site’s capacity to develop at its designated income category;
• For sites designated to accommodate lower and moderate income units:
o These sites are shown with projected capacity at 100% affordable development o The City understands that not every development will occur 100% affordability and has therefore added additional sites to the inventory with the capacity to accommodate additional lower and moderate-income units.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-15
Table B-5: Example Development on Mixed -Use Parcels
Project Address/ APN Dwelling
Units Zoning Size (Acres) General Plan (max.
density) Project Analysis
1600 W Lincoln Avenue
APN: 25009111 315 C-G (MU) 5.25 Mixed-Use High
(60 du/ac)
With its 315 residential units, the
project utilized 100% of the
allowed residential density in
addition to providing a 3,413
square-foot retail space.
1122 N Anaheim
Boulevard
APN: 03501051
269 I (MU) 4.48 Mixed-Use High
(60 du/ac)
With its 269 residential units, the
project utilized 100% of the
allowed residential density.
1041 & 1075 N Link
(formerly Pacificenter)
APN: 34518127 and
34518125
406
Specific Plan
/ Transit
Oriented
Area DA-3

14.68 Mixed-Use High
(60 du/ac)
With its 406 residential units, the
project maximized density in the
residential phases (5.26 acres) of
the Link OC project immediately
adjacent to the Anaheim Canyon
Metrolink station.
1837 S Market St
APN: 23212130 270 I (PTMU) 3.2
Master Site Plan
Target Residential
Range
(50 – 85 du/ac)
With its 270 residential units, the
project utilized 96% of the
maximum residential density in
addition to providing 21,640
square feet of commercial space.
1404 E Katella
APN: 23212131 253 I (PTMU) 3.0
Master Site Plan
Target Residential
Range
(50 – 85 du/ac)
With its 253 residential units, the
project utilized 93% of the
maximum residential density in
addition to providing 17,278
square feet of commercial space.

The City identified unit capacity on candidate sites considering existing development on site and the feasible addition of housing, development standards for the respective zone, and the remaining acreage after subdivision. Then unit capacity was calculated by multiplying the net acreage of the site (considering existing environmental issues and existing structures) by the assumed density.

A sample site calculation for a nonvacant site is shown below:
• Site 19 - APN: 27107106
• Zone: C-3 GPA and RCL (DA)
• Rezone Density: 36 dwelling units/acre
• Existing use: Underutilized hotel with large surface parking. The location of this site near other residential uses makes it desirable for housing development. Redevelopment of this site to accommodate housing is feasible as an individual parcel or combination with adjacent parcels.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-16
• Existing Structures: 1
• Acreage: .86 acres
• Existing Environmental Considerations: no existing environmental considerations • Net units: 24
• Total Affordable Unit yield: 24
Table B -10 lists the candidate sites identified, including notes detailing why each site was selected. A number of non-vacant sites were selected as they are underutilized and have had frequent property turnover. Underutilized sites include commercial lots with large parking area that remains mostly unused and underutilized hotels with large surface parking areas . In addition, recent and frequent property turnover may be seen as a sign of an unsuccessful commercial lot.

Mostly commercial in nature, most of the non-vacant sites identified in Table B-10 are underutilized or are considered non vacant per HCD’s standards. These sites were analyzed based on viability for redevelopment, as well as:
• Parcel acreage
• Availability of land for residential development
• Existing use
• Accessibility to resources and transit proximity
Development of Non-Vacant Sites for Residential Use
State law presumes that non-vacant sites are subject to constraints based on the existing use, and findings are required to demonstrate the feasibility of non -vacant sites for housing. This analysis may include a description of the existing use, market conditions, and previous redevelopment experience, as well as any new programs and incentives to promote reuse and redevelopment. Infill development on non-vacant sites are identified to help meet the City’s RHNA. The non -vacant sites identified present opp ortunities for future residential development in important areas within the City. The City has evaluated recent projects, within the last five years, which have included the development of residential units on non-vacant sites that required a Zoning Map Amendment for residential use . Table B-6 provides each projects location, zoning, use prior to development with housing, and the number of dwelling units constructed on site.

The City has also conducted a parcel specific analysis of existing uses for each of the identified sites. This analysis of existing uses, including indicators of a likelihood that the existing use will redevelop within the next eight years, are provided in Table B-10. The information that the City used for this analysis is readily available to the City and found through online research. As part of the site selection process, the City analyzed existing residentially zoned parcels that have propensity to develop at their existing densities.

To further justify housing opportunity sites included in the Sites Inventory, example developments have been identified in Anaheim and adjacent cities to demonstrate “recycling” trends occurring in the region.

Recycling land is desirable to help achieve th e Legislature’s goal of alleviating California’s identified housing crisis. According to HCD, during the last ten years, housing production averaged fewer than 80,000 new homes each year, and ongoing production continues to fall far below the projected nee d of 180,000 additional homes annually. The lack of supply and high rent costs suggests that land recycling activities is a method to consider when addressing housing needs.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-17
Identified projects share many characteristics with selected opportunity sites including zoning, lot size, previous use, geographic location, and potential for lot consolidation. These projects show strong trends for converting the following uses to high-density residential:
• Commercial office space
• Underperforming retail space
• Surface parking
• Restaurants
• Auto repair shops
• Motels
Development trends in the City show that a vast majority of mixed-use zoned projects have a residential component with a marginal representation or square footage being devoted to commercial use. None of the proposed mixed-use zoned projects are 100 percent devoted to non-residential purposes. Therefore, it can also be reasonably assumed that further residential development would continue to occur in areas zoned mixed -use to accommodate both residential and non -residential uses. It is anticipated that development in mixed-use zones will integrate residential development where nonresidential and low- density residential uses are present, providing additional housing in higher -resource areas with greater access to transportation and jobs.

The City will work to continue this trend by facilitating the development of mixed-use projects by offering development incentives and working with developers to discuss housing development opportunities in areas designated for mixed -use. Additionally, the City will promote affordable housing development in the high resource areas of the City. As candidate and non-candidate sites develop, the City will continue to monitor development trends and potentially adjust development assumptions.

Lease Analysis
Existing lease agreements on infill and non -vacant properties present a potential impediment that may prevent residential development within the planning period. State law requires the City to consider lease terms in evaluating the use of non -vacant sites. The City made diligent efforts to consider existing lease agreements during the candidate site analysis process; however, the City does not have access to private party lease agreements or other contractual agreements amongst private parties. While the City does not have access to lease structures, as these are private documents, sites were analyzed to identify sites that show characteristics indicating they are likely to redevelop within the planning period, including the following:
• Past performance redeveloping non-vacant sites
• Analysis of existing use
• Market analysis of land costs and redevelopment opportunities In addition, the City has met with local developers and land owners to solicit overall Housing Element feedback and interest and support in the City’s Sites Inventory strategy. As shown in Table B-6 below, the City has had past experience with redevelopment of non-vacant sites. Future residential development in the City may include the demolition of currently vacant retail structures, and/or separate residential development in the current parking area with the addition of a parking structure or underground parking to account for the lost spaces. Specific details on the dev elopment of the site will depend on proposals and collaboration with potential developers.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-18
Table B-6: Example Development of Non-Vacant Sites for Residential Uses Project
Address/ APN
Dwelling
Units Zoning Size
(Acres)
Use Prior
to Housing Project Analysis
1600 W Lincoln
Avenue
315 C-G
(MU) 5.25 Auto
Dealership
General Plan Amendment from
General Commercial to Mixed -Use High Land
Use Designation and Zone Change to add
Mixed Use (MU) Overlay Zone to Existing “C -G”
General Commercial Zone.

APN: 25009111
1619-1699 W
Lincoln Ave
115 RM 3.5 7.17
Industrial
Uses/
Freeway
Remnant
General Plan Amendment from General
Commercial to Mid Density Residential Land
Use Designation and Zone Change to RM 3.5
Multiple-Family Residential from C - G, “T”
Transitional, and “I” Industrial Zones.

APN: 03527040
100-394 W
Cerritos Ave 292 RM 3.5 11.87
Light
Industrial/
Office
Complex
General Plan Amendment from General
Commercial to Mid Density Residential land
use designation and
Zone Change from C -G to RM -3.5 APN: 08221405
702-798 N
Ethan Way 39 RM 3.5 1.57
Outdoor
Storage/
Vehicle
General Plan Amendment from Low Density
Residential to Mid Density Residential land use
designation and Zone Change from I to RM 3.5
Zone APN: 03520501 Storage/
Parking
312-400 S Euclid
and 1678 W
Broadway 39 RM-3 2.35 Small Retail
Center
General Plan Amendment from
General Commercial and Corridor Residential
to the Low -Medium Residential Density land
use designation and Zone Change from C -G to
RM-3 Multiple Family
Residential Zone
APN: 25005118
Table B -6 above shows that there is interest in redevelopment of non -vacant sites within the City of Anaheim. Many of the candidate housing sites within the inventory are similar to those mentioned above in that they are industrial or commercial land uses. Additionally, virtually all recent residential development in the City has occurred on infill sites which transitioned from nonresidential to residential.

Many of the candidate housing sites are near residential uses, which makes them more compatible for residential development as there are already neighborhood communities in the vicinity. All sites in the candidate housing site inventory have been chosen based on their redevelopment potential and their beneficial locations within the City.

The identified sites in Table B-10 are similar in size to the examples in Table B-6 which indicates that lot size is not an impediment to redevelopment. Additionally, the existing uses of identified sites are similar, and in many cases, identical to the examples in Table B-6. Past performance and examples in the City can guide future redevelopment opportunities. As mentioned above, many of the candidate sites are located near or adjacent to existing residential uses, making redevelopment into residential more feasible due to compatibility. Many of the candidate sites are aging and underuti lized, making redevelopment an attractive option for both current owners and future developers.

The examples in Table B-6 are located near some candidate sites and also located along the same corridors as most of the candidate sites. The Table B-6 examples are surrounded by the same or similar uses as Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-19
many of the candidate sites. Based on a multitude of factors listed above as well as past development trends, the City determined that nonvacant sites are suitable to accommodate the City’s RHNA Fifth Cycle Sites.

The City has included 15 sites from the Fifth Cycle Housing Element Update in the Sixth Cycle Housing Element Update, 10 of which are included at modified (increased) capacities and five of which are included at the capacity reflected by the Fifth Cycle. The strategies that follow, excepting the “Existing City Wide Capacity” reflect new strategies the City has developed to accommodate the Sixth Cycle RHNA.

Corridor Analysis for Nonvacant Sites
To further align the development examples in Table B-6 with the candidate sites inventory, the City has created corridor analysis which characterize the previous condition of the typical redevelopment sites within Anaheim. Those development scenarios are described below and applied both to the real world examples in Table B-6 and to each candidate housing site. This further solidifies their redevelopment potential as each site within the inventory shares characteristics with previous development on sites with existing uses. The development scenarios are as outlined below.

COMMERCIAL – SHOPPING CENTER
Regional commercial trends within Southern California are leading to the re -envisioning of shopping centers and malls as lifestyle centers where regional and neighborhood serving retail uses complement housing for a more walkable development. The sites in Table B-10 demonstrate significant potential to redevelop due to existing tenant vacancies and vacant land that is available to be developed within shopping center properties. These areas have drastically underutilized parking fields which represent opportunity to introduce residential uses which complement remaining existing commercial uses and bring new users into the area. The City assumes that development of these areas will either occupy underutilized surface parking areas in addition to the existing commercial uses or will replace existing uses all together. This is consistent with development seen within the region and realistic for future development in the City of Anaheim.

Recent local examples of this type of redevelopment include:
• MainPlace Mall in Santa Ana which envisions the development of up to 1,900 residential units in addition to existing commercial, office, and the addition of a hotel. • Metro Towne Square mall in Santa Ana, an outdoor neighborhood serving shopping mall where plans are underway to redevelop the area with a new mixed-use development with nearly 4,000 dwelling units and experiential commercial retail stores/restaurants. • Westminster Mall in Westminster which envisions up to 3,000 new residential units in a dated mall space. The new units largely occupy open parking fields as is envisioned in the sites proposed in the cities inventory.

COMMERCIAL – MAIN CORRIDOR (CENTRAL AVENUE, CHINO AVE, RIVERSIDE DRIVE, EUCLID) Main corridor roads include commercial sites along Anaheim Blvd, Harbor Blvd, Ball Rd, Lincoln Ave, Katella Ave, Beach Blvd, and State College Blvd. These are the primary commercial and transportation corridors throughout the City and provide access to public transportation, regional highways/freeways, shopping for required goods, job-creating uses, and necessary resources for lower -incomes households.

These are significant redevelopment opportunities for the City and it is anticipated that the sites identified Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-20
along major commercial corridors will redevelop within the planning period. Much like existing shopping centers and mall properties, it is anticipated that future development on these sites will either incorporate the existing uses on site or redevelop entirely.

COMMERCIAL – SELF-STORAGE
Existing self-storage facilities and propertied which primarily serve as storage facilities do not fully utilize the potential for these parcels. These sites are located along major corridors which provide convenient transit access. Underutilized properties such as these are high value given the low intensity of existing uses. Given the adjacency to residential uses, underutilized nature, and close proximity to schools and open space, these sites are likely to be developed for housing in the near term.

HOTELS AND MOTELS
The City of Anaheim has facilitated the conversion of hotels and motels into longer term housing and anticipates the continuation of this trend. Many older hotels and motels in the City have been in disrepair for years and the City has seen developer interest in either converting these uses into permanent housing or demolishing existing uses and developing new units. Hotels and motels provide significant opportunity in terms of housing growth as they are often located along major corridors or close to existing residential areas adjacent to community resources such as commercial shopping centers, schools, and parks. The identified sites are adjacent to major transit corridors which increases the likelihood for development.

These areas have drastically underutilized parking fields which represent opportunity to introduce long term residential uses which complement remaining existing commercial uses and bring new users into the area. The City assumes that development of these areas will either occupy underutilized surface parking areas in addition to the existing uses or will replace existing uses all together. This is consistent with development seen within the region and realistic for future development in the City.

Market Analysis
In addition to an existing use analysis, the City of Anaheim utilizes information on market conditions to facilitate the redevelopment of non -vacant sites for residential use. A California Association of Realtors (CAR) report for Historic Housing trends shows that the average time a unit spent on the market in Orange County is just 17 days in the last four years (2019-2023) and just 15 days in the last two years.1 Additionally, according to the CAR Current Sales and Price Statistical Survey, the median cost of a home for sale in Orange County increased by over 30 percent from 2021-20232. Both indicators signify an increased market demand for new housing.

In addition to market appetite, the cost of land in the City, on average, is lower than neighboring jurisdictions. Based on the analysis of sale prices of vacant lots in Anaheim, the estimated average cost of land per square foot in the City is about $40.46 per square foot. On average, this is lower than the surrounding jurisdictions and the average for Orange County which ranges from $60 to $120 per square foot. Paired with increased demand for housing, and almost all recent development in the last decade coming from infill opportunities, assumed redevelopment in the City is reasonable. 1 Median time on Market of Existing Detached Homes, Historical Data, California Association of Realtors (CAR), Accessed online: September 8, 2023. https://www.car.org/marketdata/data 2 Current Sales and Price Statistics, California Association of Realtors (CAR), Accessed online: September 28, 2021. https://www.car.org/marketdata/data

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-21
Redevelopment Factors

The City has identified a number of factors which, when paired together, show an increased likelihood of the nonvacant sites redeveloping; Table B-7 details the redevelopment factors and includes the amount of applicable sites. These examples are highlighted in the “Corridor Analysis for Nonvacant Sites” above and the “Representative Sites Analysis” below. Programs included in the Housing Policy Program are meant to further facilitate residential development in Anaheim.

Table B-10 specifies redevelopment factors applicable to each site. All parcels have at least three redevelopment factors.

Table B-7: Redevelopment Factors for Candidate Sites
Redevelopment Factor Applicable
Sites Notes

1. Existing structure was built prior to
1990 (over 30 years ago) – Aging
structures over 30 years are
considered likely in need of some
rehabilitation. As structural age
increases so does the need for repairs
and improvements and the likelihood
for redevelopment. Age may also
incentivize property owners to sell or
redevelop their property to maximize
their investment.
95% Redevelopment of older commercial uses is the most
common redevelopment pattern in the City of
Anaheim and is extremely common as highlighted in
the representative sites analysis section below. These
projects redeveloped to include a variety of new,
residential uses such as mixed-use developments and
fully residential developments with affordable
components. Examples 1, 2, 4, and 5 in the
representative sites analysis section below fall into
this category.

2. Existing uses do not include housing
units. Sites with existing housing units
may be more difficult to redevelop as
existing tenants would need to find
alternative accommodations and may
have an active lease. As such , parcels
with existing units are limited.

However, in certain cases an existing
development may be able to
accommodate new units or become a
good candidate for redevelopment.
100% As analyzed in redevelopment factor #1 above, the
redevelopment of nonresidential to residential is the
most common redevelopment pattern in the City of
Anaheim. All examples in the representative sites
analysis section below fall into this category.

In the 5 th Housing Element Cycle, the City approved
residential projects with prior residential uses,
including single -family home s, and lower density
apartment structures. Neighboring jurisdictions have
also seen the redevelopment of lower density
residential transitioning into higher density
residential. While the City has seen intensification of existing residential uses, the City encourages the
redevelopment of nonresidential uses in an effort to
preserve all existing residential uses. The
redevelopment of existing residential uses may
intensify residential uses but may also replace units
that are "naturally-occurring” affordable units.

3. Adjacent parcels – Adjacent parcels
may be consolidated to facilitate
more intense and higher density
development.
75% Anaheim and the n eighboring jurisdictions of Santa Ana have seen successful multi -family development
built through the consolidation of adjacent parcels.

Typical examples include projects consolidating
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-22
parcels such as surface parking lot s,
commercial/retail buildings, and office building s. All examples in the representative sites analysis section
below fall into this category.

4. Part or fully surface parking lot –
Surface parking lots are not
considered vacant, yet they do not
have existing built structures and are
therefore good candidates for
redevelopment.
85% Surface parking lot redevelopment has been
successful in the City and the region. A couple
examples are included in the representative sites
analysis section below.

5. City-Owned – A City-owned parcel is
considered an ideal candidate site
given the jurisdictions ability to
control the sell and development of
the site. As such, the City may be able
to choose a buyer who plans on
redeveloping the parcel to the extent
anticipated in the Housing Element.
2% Housing Production Strategy 1W: City-Owned Sites
and Surplus Land Act is included in the Housing
Policy Program to establish actions the City will take
to develop City-owned land.

6. Hotel/Motel – The City of Anaheim
has facilitated the conversion of
hotels and motels into longer term
housing and anticipates the
continuation of this trend. Many older
hotels and motels in the City have
been in disrepair for years and the City
has seen developer interest in either
converting these uses into permanent
housing or demolishing existing uses
and developing new units.
6% Hotels and motels provide significant opportunity in terms of housing growth as they are often located
along major corridors or close to existing residential
areas adjacent to community resources such as
commercial shopping centers, schools, and parks.

The identified sites are adjacent to major transit
corridors which increases the likelihood for
development. These areas have drastically
underutilized parking lots and represent an
opportunity to introduce long term residential uses
that complement remaining existing commercial uses
and bring new users into the area. The City assumes
that development of these areas will either occupy
underutilized surface parking areas in addition to the
existing uses or will replace existing uses all together.

This is consistent with development seen within the
region and realistic for future development in the
City. The City implemented the Anaheim Motel
Conversion Ordinance to allow the conversion of
motels to Permanent Supportive Housing for
extremely-low income househol ds, providing
another tool to increase the amount of extremely -
low income units.

7. Specific or Master Plan – The City of
Anaheim has planned for balanced
development opportunities for
commercial, office, residential, and
industrial uses linked together with
walkable streets, open space and
consistent landscape and established
49% The City has included additional residential capacity in the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan and Platinum
Triangle Master Plan (Housing Production Strategy
1G) areas, which include the Anaheim Metrolink
Canyon Station and the Anaheim Regional
Transportation Intermodal Center, respectively. Sites
are also identified in the Beach Boulevard Specific
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-23
regulatory frameworks in the form of
Specific or Master Plans. Sites in areas
governed by existing Specific or
Master Plans, the adoption of which
added residential uses to the area,
provide the opportunity to develop
additional housing in this planned
context.

Plan. New residential development has already
occurred pursuant to all three plans.

Representative Sites Analysis
Due to the large number of suitable sites in the City’s inventory, the five “representative sites” of recent sites redeveloped with residential uses were analyzed . The analysis was prepared to describe development patterns and highlight similarities with candidate sites identified in the sites inventory . As mentioned above, due to a lack of available vacant land in Anaheim , virtually all recent residential development in the City has occurred on infill sites that transitioned from non-residential to residential use. During the site selection process, the City analyzed whether existing uses would impede or prevent additional development. Based on those factors, candidate sites were removed if they were deemed not suitable for residential development in the planning period.

The following examples highlight existing infill development in the City and are representative of residential development across the City in the types of uses before and after residential development. All existing uses in these examples are similar or even identical to many of the existing uses found in the Sixth Cycle candidate sites table (Table B-10).

Example #1: 1600 W Lincoln Avenue
Just south of the I -5 freeway in Anaheim, construction is underway for a large mixed -use multifamily residential complex featuring a total of 315 studio, one -, two-, and three-bedroom apartments, ranging from 600 to 1,900 square feet in size. The project, dubbed Zia, is being developed on the former site of a car dealership at 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue. The apartment complex, which will span across a 5.2-acre site, also calls for amenities such as a 4,900-square-foot fitness center, a children’s lounge area, a pool, multiple courtyards, co -working spaces, a basketball court, a walking path, and a private park. The 315 -unit development will also have ground -floor commercial space. The apartments are expected to open for residents starting in mid-2024. Figure B-1 below shows the previous use in October 2021 and construction of the new residential apartment complex as of January 2023.

The previous use, an auto dealership, is similar to other auto sales and repair uses along many of the City’s main corridors. These uses typically have structures with small footprints of the overall lot and can easily be demolished and redeveloped with higher intensity uses such as the one currently under construction.

Sites that have similar uses have seen an uptick in redevelopment due to the relatively streamlined process of redeveloping existing sites. Example #1 exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.

The development site below is located across the street from another nonvacant infill development project that is also under construction. That development is analyzed below (Example #2: 1619 -1699 W Lincoln Ave).

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-24
Figure B-1: Suitability of Nonvacant Sites Example #1 (1600 W Lincoln Avenue) October, 2021
January, 2023
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-25
Example #2: 1619-1699 W Lincoln Ave
The 7.17-acre site, located near the northeast corner of Euclid Street and Lincoln Avenue, consisted of four contiguous lots previously owned by the City of Anaheim and Anastasi Development Company. The applicant proposed razing existing uses, including a manufacturing facility and two auto dealerships, to make way for the construction of 115 attached one-, two-, and three-bedroom dwellings.

The development was completed in 2023 and consists of 27 separate buildings, each standing three stories in height and sit atop two -car garage s. The project has approximately 34,000 square feet of common open space amenities, including a courtyard with a pool, a spa, and three pocket parks. Figure B-2 below shows the previous use in October 202 0 and construction of the new residential apartment complex as of January 2023.

The previous uses, a manufacturing facility and two auto dealerships, are similar to other uses along many of the City’s main corridors. These uses typically have structures with small footprints of the overall lot and can be demolished and redeveloped with higher intensity uses such as the one shown below. Example #2 exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.

The development site is located across the street from another nonvacant infill development project that is also under construction. That development is analyzed above (Example #1: 1600 W Lincoln Ave).

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-26
Figure B-2: Suitability of Nonvacant Sites Example #2 (1619-1699 W Lincoln Ave) January, 2023
October, 2020

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-27
Example #3: 100-394 W Cerritos Ave

The 11.87-acre site, located near the intersection of Anaheim Blvd and I-5, is being constructed as a large multifamily residential complex featuring a total of 292 two -, three -, and four -bedroom apartments, ranging from 1,200 to 2,000 square feet in size. The project, dubbed 100 West is being developed on the former site of an office complex with some light industrial uses as well. The residential complex also calls for amenities such as a community recreation center. Figure B-3 below shows the previous use in March 2019 and construction of the new residential apartment complex as of January 2023.

The previous uses, an office park with some light industrial uses and a banquet hall , are similar to other uses along many of the City’s main corridors such as Anaheim Blvd. These uses typically have structures with small footprints of the overall lot and can be demolished and redeveloped with higher intensity uses such as the one shown below. The development has 30 moderate -income units. Example #3 exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.

The development site is located adjacent to a new hotel development which opened in April 2021.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-28
Figure B-3: Suitability of Nonvacant Sites Example #3 (100-394 W Cerritos Ave)

January, 2023
March, 2019
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-29
Example #4: 702-798 N Ethan Way
The project, called the Downtown Anaheim 39, was completed in early 2022 and provides 39 homes on a

1.57-acre property that was previously used for RV storage. The development consists of seven three - story buildings, each standing approximately 37 feet in height with a mix of two- and three-bedroom floor plans and 106 parking spaces for residents and guests. The development is near the downtown area and is a representation of various other infill projects that have been completed in the area and continue to be proposed and constructed. Figure B-4 below shows the previous use in December 2017 and the new residential apartment complex as of May 2022.

The previous uses, an RV storage, is similar to other uses along many of the City’s main corridors and industrial areas. These uses typically have structures with small footprints of the overall lot and can be demolished and redeveloped with higher intensity uses such as the one shown below. Example #4 exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-30
Figure B-4: Suitability of Nonvacant Sites Example #4 (702-798 N Ethan Way)

December, 2017
May, 2022
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-31
Example #5: 312-400 S Euclid
The 2.35-acre site was previously occupied with three buildings totaling 102,432 square feet of office, a small strip mall, and restaurant uses. The site’s previous uses were similar to its current surrounding uses, including a retail commercial center to the south, and various commercial uses across Euclid Street to the west. The development included the demolition of existing office, commercial, and restaurant buildings to construct 39 attached and detached condominium units.

The development is near the downtown and Anaheim Resort and is a r epresentative of other infill projects that have been completed in the area and continue to be proposed and constructed. Figure B-5 below shows the previous use in January 2018 and the new residential complex as of September 2022.

The previous uses are similar or identical to other uses along many of the City’s main corridors and industrial areas. These uses typically have structures with small footprints of the overall lot and can be demolished and redeveloped with higher intensity uses such as the one shown below. Example #5 exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-32
Figure B-5: Suitability of Nonvacant Sites Example #4 (312-400 S Euclid) View from Euclid Street - December, 2018
View from Euclid Street - September, 2022

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-33
Figure B-5: Suitability of Nonvacant Sites Example #5 (312-400 S Euclid) Continued View from Broadway - December, 2018
View from Broadway - September, 2022

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-34
Representative Sites Analysis Summary

Examples 1 through 5 above have been analyzed as sites representative of the sites in the candidate sites inventory ( Table B -10). The existing uses on the identified candidate sites are similar or identical to previous uses in the examples above . These uses do not impede on future redevelopment. The five examples analyzed above are disbursed throughout the City to show the viability of redevelopment in all areas of the City.

Sites that have similar uses as the examples analyzed above have seen an uptick in redevelopment due to the relatively streamlined process of redeveloping existing sites. Sites that are on main corridors or are within a half mile of a freeway have become increasingly attractive to developers as well as future residents. These areas are attractive due to ease of connectivity to other parts of the City and region, proximity to grocery stores and entertainment, and the presence of diverse uses which make these areas more people-friendly. These areas also benefit from more lax development standards and benefits such as density bonuses and State-funding available to developments in accessible areas. A summary of each representative site is provided below:

• Figure B-1 (Example #1) shows that a former auto-related facility was redeveloped into a mixed- use residential apartment building with 315 units.
• Figure B-2 (Example #2) shows an industrial storage area was redeveloped into medium-density residential units.
• Figure B -3 ( Example #3) demonstrates an office park that was redeveloped into high -density residential units.
• Figure B-4 (Example #4) shows a paved storage yard that was converted into medium -density residential units.
• Figure B-5 (Example #5) is an example of a strip mall and office building that was redeveloped into medium-density residential units.

Table B-10 indicates the most common existing uses were commercial buildings, parking lots, industrial buildings, business and office spaces, commercial strip malls, and hotels. These uses are consistent with the examples provided above and these uses are commonly converted to residential uses.

Due to a lack of vacant land, virtually all recent residential development in the City has occurred on infill sites which transitioned from nonresidential to residential such as those analyzed above. During the site selection process, the City analyzed existing uses to determine if the uses impede or preclude additional development and removed all sites that were not suitable for development.

Recent residential development, market trends, and developer interest all indicate that redevelopment of nonvacant sites is feasible and through the analysis in this appendix, the City has justified the suitability of nonvacant sites. Anaheim has facilitated an unprecedented amount of infill development in the City in the Sixth Cycle and will continue to facilitate and encourage efficient use of its limited available land.

Existing Citywide Capacity
The City has multiple zones which permit residential development at appropriate densities for affordable housing and which have remaining capacity to accommodate residential development. There are 79 sites identified under existing zoning within approximately 117 acres of potential development area. These sites are primarily within the Platinum Triangle, Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan, and Beach Boulevard Specific Plan but are also in other areas throughout the City. These sites have the capacity to develop Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-35
5,984 units, 557 of which have the capacity to develop affordably. Additionally, the City has committed to Housing Production Strategy 1K that creates by-right housing development opportunities on sites that have been identified in two or more consecutive Housing Element planning periods.

City Center Corridors (C3) Implementation Plan
The development of the C3 Implementation Plan is currently underway, and the City anticipates that it will bring considerable housing potential to the study area. The City has identified multiple sites to accommodate its RHNA allocation within the future C3 Implementation Plan using the assumptions detailed previously in this appendix. In order to accommodate this capacity, several of the identified sites will require General Plan land use designation changes, in addition to receiving a change in zoning as part of the approvals for the C3 Implementation Plan.

Table B-8: Sites for Rezone within C3Implementation Plan Category Income Sites Acres Unit Capacity
No Change in GPLU
Designation
Lower Income 0 0 0
Moderate Income 8 15 1,157
Above Moderate Income 11 14 661
Proposed Change
in GPLU Designation
Lower Income 8 7 171
Moderate Income 8 24 844
Above Moderate Income 24 27 903
Total: 59 87 3,736
NOTE: Further site details are in Table B-10
Citywide Zoning or Overlay Zone Change
The City identified sites, which require a change in the Zone or Overlay Zone designation to accommodate housing at appropriate densities for all income levels. Several of these sites will also require a change to the General Plan Land Use designation. Implementation of policies under Housing Production Strategy Area (found within Section 4: Housing Policy Program) will reclassify these sites to add either the Residential Opportunities (RO) Overlay Zone or the Mixed Use (MU) Overlay Zone as indicated below.

This rezone strategy intends to create housing opportunities in well -connected nonresidential areas of the City. The overlay zones will permit residential uses. The proposed overlays will not replace the existing zoning but will be an additional entitlement to these properties that looks to promote the development of affordable housing through higher density development. These are new overlays within the City and development standards will be created within input from the community, experienced developers, and City decision makers. These development standards will be based on historical development within the City and will support development at the densities identified in this Housing Element. There are no inconsistencies with the base zoning or General Plan Land Use created by the implementation of these overlays.

Considering existing development and a lack of vacant land, the City’s housing strategy to demonstrate capacity for the 2021-2029 RHNA growth need relies on infill development opportunities throughout the Anaheim. In each of these sites, existing land use policy either allows residential by -right, allows residential by-right through a mixed-use development project, or does not allow residential at all. As part of the identification of new sites, the City will adopt new land use regulations (found within Section 4:

Housing Policy Program) that will ensure residential development is permitted by-right. It is not the City’s

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-36
intent to exclude the permitting of nonresidential development in these areas, as it is a vital land use component that contributes to a livable, mixed-use character in support of many citywide goals.

While the City understands its RHNA obligations, it must also continue to accommodate growth for jobs, retail, services, and amenities, especially in existing mixed-use land use category areas. In order to account for and address this, the City has evaluated each of the sites and has accounted for nonresidential growth.

The assumptions vary depending on the past performance of recent development and future projected trends. In areas where there are pending applications and owner or developer interest, assumptions for residential were increased. Conversely, assumptions were decreased in areas where residential development is more speculative.

Between the redevelopment assumptions and the demonstrative projects exhibiting a solid trend towards residential development, the City believes mixed -use designated areas are conducive to residential development and essential to maintaining thriving, vibrant neighborhoods.

However, until January 1, 2030, Government Code Section 65589.5(j)(4) allows development of sites that are consistent with objective General Plan standards and criteria without the requirement for a zone change.

Table B-9: Sites for Rezone Citywide
Category Income Sites Acres* Unit Capacity
No Change in GPLU
Designation
Lower Income 2 3 93
Moderate Income 34 36 2,408
Above Moderate
Income 15 22 517
Proposed Change in
GPLU Designation
Lower Income 117 262 6,838
Moderate Income 0 0 0
Above Moderate
Income 1 22 480
Total: 169 345 10,336
NOTE: Further site details are in Table B-10.
*Rounded to the nearest acre
Housing Authority and Successor Agency Sites
The City has identified sites currently owned by the City’s Housing Authority and Successor Agency as having additional capacity to accommodate housing development at existing zoning capacity. Based on existing maximum densities permitted by the General Plan/Zoning or planned for by the Housing Authority or Successor Agency, which would allow up to either 36 du/ac or 60 du/ac, these sites have the capacity to accommodate 392 units of residential development. The permitted or planned development intensities for these sites have the capacity to result in the development of 98 affordable units. The remaining 294 units consist of 286 moderate income units and 8 above moderate units. There are a total of 16 City - Owned, Housing Authority or Successor Agency sites in Table B-10: Anaheim Full Sites Inventory. These sites are identified as Unique ID#s 406 through 453 in Table B-10. Seven of the sites have had an NOA on May 2, 2022 and the City received a HCD Compliance Letter on Sept 15, 2022. Seven more sites are planned to be available in 2023. Housing Production Strategy 1W: City -Owned Sites and Surplus Land Act has been added to the Housing Plan to provide a process to make city-owned sites available. The City has released NOAs for 7 candidate site properties in 2022 and plans to release the additional 7 by 2025.

The City will take the following actions:

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-37
• Maintain compliance with the Surplus Land Act throughout the 2021-2029 Housing Element period
• Establish and implement a variety of incentives to facilitate housing development. • Make properties available through the Surplus Land Act process • Continue to release candidate site properties through the NOA / RFP process and solicit developers by Spring 2025
• Target Exclusive Negotiating Agreements for the candidate sites by Spring 2026 • Target land use entitlements issuance for the candidate sites by Winter 2027 As of 2023, the City is on track to make all City-owned properties available by December 2025, but will evaluate alternative actions if the City is not meeting timeline goals. The City will evaluate progress every year beginning in February 2024.

All candidate sites were analyzed for any known conditions that preclude or significantly impact development in the planning period. Examples of other known conditions include shape, access, property conditions, easements, contamination, and airport compat ibility. Based on this analysis, the City determined that all candidate sites can feasibly develop housing and do not experience any known constraints.

Figure B-6 through B-11 display the sites identified to accommodate the City of Anaheim’s RHNA for the 2021-2029 Housing Element Planning Period, with the exception of ADU, which the City and State law permit within residential areas citywide. As described in this appendix, the development capacity for each site depends on its permitted density, consistency with surrounding uses, the City’s past performance, development trends, and the site’s location, as well as known development factors. District 5 has the most candidate sites providin g 37.7 percent of the units ( 7,747 units), followed by District 3 at 20.6 percent (4,226 units), District 6 at 20 percent (4,120 units), District 4 at 14.5 percent (2,987 units), District 1 at 6.7 percent (1,372 units), and District 2 at less than half a percent (108 units).

Table B-10 identifies each Candidate Site with a unique identifier used to track sites within the inventory, as well as by assessor parcel number (APN) and physical address . Additionally, the table provides the following information for each parcel:
• Category, including sites identified in the previous Housing Element • Parcel size and whether the site meets the minimum site size (0.5 acres) and is no greater than the maximum site size (10 acres) permitted by State law to be considered as a lower income (low and very low income) site
• Existing and, as applicable, any proposed General Plan Land Use Designation • Existing and, as applicable, any proposed Zoning (including Specific Plan and Overlay Zones) • Maximum and Assumed Density
• Potential Housing Units by Income Category based on Assumed Density • Assumed Income Category based on expected density of development Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-38
Figure B-6: Candidate Sites Inventory District 1

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-39
Figure B-7: Candidate Sites Inventory District 2

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-40

Figure B-8: Candidate Sites Inventory District 3

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-41
Figure B-9: Candidate Sites Inventory District 4

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-42
Figure B-10: Candidate Sites Inventory District 5

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-43
Figure B-11: Candidate Sites Inventory District 6

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-44 Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
3 03711130
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
NO ADDRESS 0.27 Yes No
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
I RO Residential-
Mid C3IP (RM-3.5) No
Overlay 27 21.6 5 0 0 5 Above
Moderate
This parcel is parking affiliated with an
industrial building. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, and

4. 4 23416109
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
221 E BALL RD 0.29 No Commercial-
General I SABC Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 13 0 0 13 Above
Moderate
This parcel has a two-story industrial
building with similar adjacent uses.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
5 08248115
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1380 S
ANAHEIM BLVD 0.3 No Commercial-
General I SABC Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 14 0 0 14 Above
Moderate
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
6 03713025
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1017-1021 E
SOUTH ST 0.36 Yes No
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
I RO Residential-
Mid C3IP (RM-3) No
Overlay 27 21.6 7 0 0 7 Above
Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
7 23416107
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
201 E BALL RD 0.37 No Commercial-
General I SABC Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 17 0 0 17 Above
Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
8 03713026
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1027-1029 E
SOUTH ST 0.39 Yes No
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
I RO Residential-
Mid C3IP (RM-3) No
Overlay 27 21.6 8 0 0 8 Above
Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
9 08248116
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
231 E PALAIS RD 0.47 No Commercial-
General I SABC Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 22 0 0 22 Above
Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
10 08240404
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
100 W
WINSTON RD 0.52 Yes Commercial-
General C-G SABC Mixed-Use
Medium
C3IP (MU
MED)
No
Overlay 36 28.8 14 14 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-45
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
11 03618338
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
831 S HARBOR
BLVD 0.54 Yes Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
Mid C3IP (MU-MID) No
Change 27 21.6 11 0 0 11 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains an office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
12 25108315
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
551 S OLIVE ST 0.55 Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
I SABC Mixed-Use
Mid C3IP (MU-MID) No
Overlay 27 21.6 11 0 0 11 Above
Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
13 25112114
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
871 S HARBOR
BLVD 0.61 Yes Residential-
Medium O-L Mixed-Use
Mid C3IP (MU-MID) No
Change 27 21.6 13 0 0 13 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a hotel and parking
on-site. Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6.
14 08249225
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1401 S
ANAHEIM BLVD 0.69 Yes School C-G SABC Mixed-Use
Medium
C3IP (MU
MED)
No
Overlay 36 28.8 19 19 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
15 08249230
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1363 S
ANAHEIM BLVD 0.75 Yes Commercial-
General C-G SABC Mixed-Use
Medium
C3IP (MU
MED)
No
Overlay 36 28.8 21 21 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a restaurant with
parking. The location of this site near
other residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
16 03711129
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
301 E SANTA
ANA ST 0.75 Yes Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
I RO Residential-
Mid C3IP (RM-3.5) No
Overlay 27 21.6 16 0 0 16 Above
Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
17 07343528
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
NO ADDRESS 0.76 Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
C-G Mixed-Use
Medium
C3IP (MU
MED)
No
Change 36 28.8 21 21 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

The location of this site near other
residential uses makes it desirable for
housing development. Redevelopment
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-46
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
of this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 4, and

6. 18 23416108
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
215 E BALL RD 0.81 Yes Commercial-
General I SABC Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 38 0 0 38 Above
Moderate
This parcel is mostly parking space and
has one industrial building on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
19 27107106
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1101 N HARBOR
BLVD 0.86 Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
C-G Mixed-Use
Medium
C3IP (MU
MED)
No
Change 36 28.8 24 24 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

The location of this site near other
residential uses makes it desirable for
housing development. Redevelopment
of this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4,
and 6.
20 23416110
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
231-301 E BALL
RD 0.95 Yes Commercial-
General I SABC Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 45 0 0 45 Above
Moderate
This parcel is used for industrial uses and
includes outdoor storage and 3
buildings. Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2,and 4.
21 03618337
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
839-859 S
HARBOR BLVD 1.07 Yes Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
Mid C3IP (MU-MID) No
Change 27 21.6 23 0 0 23 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains one institutional
building and parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
22 23416113
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1110 S

TECHNOLOGY
CIR

1.43 Yes Commercial-
General I SABC Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 68 0 0 68 Above
Moderate
This parcel has one industrial building
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
and 4.
23 23416112
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1104-1106 S

TECHNOLOGY
CIR

1.56 Yes Commercial-
General I SABC Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 74 0 0 74 Above
Moderate
This parcel has one institutional building
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, and

4. 24 23416105 C-3 GPA
and RCL
1100 S
TECHNOLOGY 1.59 Yes Commercial-
General I SABC Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 76 0 0 76 Above
Moderate
This parcel has one industrial building
along with outdoor storage and parking
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-47
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
(DA) CIR on-site. Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
25 23416111
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
309-323 E BALL
RD 1.76 Yes Commercial-
General I SABC Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 84 0 0 84 Above
Moderate
This parcel has one industrial building
along with outdoor storage and parking
on-site. Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
26 03713028
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
601-605 S EAST
ST 1.93 Yes Yes Residential-
Medium I RO Residential-
Mid C3IP (RM-3) No
Overlay 27 21.6 41 0 0 41 Above
Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
27 25108122
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
520 S CLAUDINA
ST 2.07 Yes Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
I RO, SABC Mixed-Use
Mid C3IP (MU-MID) No
Overlay 27 21.6 44 0 0 44 Above
Moderate
This parcel has one industrial/office flex
building and parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
28 08248114
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1360 S
ANAHEIM BLVD 2.38 Yes Commercial-
General I SABC Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 114 0 0 114 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains an office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
29 03521009
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
701-791 E
SYCAMORE ST 2.41 Yes Residential-
Low Density I Residential-
Medium C3IP (RM-4) No
Change 36 28.8 69 69 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2 and 4.
30 25108126
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
300 E SANTA
ANA ST 2.67 Yes Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
I RO, SABC Mixed-Use
Mid C3IP (MU-MID) No
Overlay 27 21.6 57 0 0 57 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains outdoor storage and
industrial buildings for a lumber yard.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
31 07308323
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
245 W CARL
KARCHER WAY 2.69 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 129 0 129 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-48
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
32 03501035
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
110 E

COMMERCIAL
ST

2.99 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 143 0 143 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
33 03713015
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
905 E SOUTH ST 3.59 Yes Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
I RO Residential-
Mid C3IP (RM-3) No
Overlay 27 21.6 77 0 0 77 Above
Moderate
This parcel has industrial buildings and
outdoor storage on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
34 03501047
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1240-1244 N
ANAHEIM BLVD 3.97 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 190 0 190 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
35 03501052
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1160-1190 N
ANAHEIM BLVD 7.96 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 382 0 382 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
36 25516101 C-3 RCL
(DA)
290 W LINCOLN
AVE 0.47 No Mixed-Use
Urban Core C-G DMU No Change C3IP (MU-UC) No
Overlay 100 80 37 0 37 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a restaurant with
parking. The location of this site near
other residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
37 25507611
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
280 E LINCOLN
AVE 0.53 Yes
Mixed-Use
High and
Parks
C-G and PR Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 25 0 0 25 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. The 2021 APR
findings show that this parcel was
preparing a RFP in 2021. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4 and 5.
38 25516106 C-3 RCL
(DA)
100 W LINCOLN
AVE 0.53 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core C-G DMU No Change C3IP (MU-UC) No
Overlay 100 80 42 0 42 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-49 Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
40 03510114 C-3 RCL
(DA) No Address 0.58 Yes Mixed-Use
High RM-4 No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 27 0 0 27 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains an accessory
structure with parking for a commercial
use. The location of this site near other
residential uses makes it desirable for
housing development. Redevelopment
of this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
and 4.
41 03510117 C-3 RCL
(DA) 113 W ADELE ST 0.58 Yes Mixed-Use
High T No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Overlay 60 48 27 0 0 27 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a parking lot for a
commercial use. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
42 25516104 C-3 RCL
(DA)
198 W LINCOLN
AVE 0.83 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core C-G DMU No Change C3IP (MU-UC) No
Overlay 100 80 66 0 66 0 Moderate
This parcel contains an commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
43 25506112 C-3 RCL
(DA)
200 N HARBOR
BLVD 0.91 Yes Mixed-Use
High O-L No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 43 0 0 43 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
44 03510122 C-3 RCL
(DA)
423 N ANAHEIM
BLVD 0.99 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 47 0 0 47 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-50
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
45 26715105 C-3 RCL
(DA)
201 E LA PALMA
AVE 1.13 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 54 0 0 54 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains one industrial
building and parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
46 25111112 C-3 RCL
(DA)
101 S HARBOR
BLVD 1.15 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 55 0 0 55 Above
Moderate
This parcel has a commercial building
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
and 4.
47 25507712 C-3 RCL
(DA)
20-50 S
ANAHEIM BLVD 1.34 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 64 0 0 64 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains commercial office
buildings with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
48 03501073 C-3 RCL
(DA)
1150 N
ANAHEIM BLVD 1.45 Yes Mixed-Use
High I No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 69 0 0 69 Above
Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
49 26715104 C-3 RCL
(DA) NO ADDRESS 1.82 Yes Mixed-Use
High I No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 87 0 0 87 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains an industrial
building and parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
50 25506416 C-3 RCL
(DA)
303 W LINCOLN
AVE 1.85 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 88 0 0 88 Above
Moderate
This parcel has a office building with
mostly medical office and parking
redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
51 25506417 C-3 RCL
(DA)
100 N HARBOR
BLVD, 401-451

W LINCOLN AVE

2.1 Yes Mixed-Use
High O-L No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 100 0 0 100 Above
Moderate
This parcel has offices and parking
redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
52 25516102 C-3 RCL
(DA)
270-280 W
LINCOLN AVE 3.05 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core C-G DMU No Change C3IP (MU-UC) No
Overlay 100 80 244 0 244 0 Moderate This parcel contains commercial buildings with parking. The location of
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-51
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
53 25516105 C-3 RCL
(DA)
130 W LINCOLN
AVE 3.96 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core C-G DMU No Change C3IP (MU-UC) No
Overlay 100 80 316 0 316 0 Moderate
This parcel contains commercial
buildings with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
54 25516103 C-3 RCL
(DA)
140-250 W
LINCOLN AVE 4.96 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core C-G DMU No Change C3IP (MU-UC) No
Overlay 100 80 396 0 396 0 Moderate
This parcel contains commercial
buildings with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
56 08375140 RCL Only NO ADDRESS 0.28 No Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area A) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area A),
MU
100 80 22 0 22 0 Moderate
This parcel has a small parking lot on-
site. Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
58 08375103 RCL Only
1810-1818 S
LEWIS ST, 902 E

KATELLA AVE

0.46 No Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area A) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area A),
MU
100 80 36 0 36 0 Moderate
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
59 08375105 RCL Only 1822 S LEWIS ST 0.63 Yes Mixed-Use Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area A) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area A),
MU
100 80 50 0 50 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
60 08375104 RCL Only 914 E KATELLA
AVE 0.73 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area A) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area A),
MU
100 80 58 0 58 0 Moderate
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
61 08375116 RCL Only 1844-1848 S
LEWIS ST 0.84 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area A) No Change No Change PTMU
(Katella 100 80 67 0 67 0 Moderate This parcel has an industrial building and parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-52
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
Sub-
Area A),
MU
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
62 25353206 RCL Only 2400 E KATELLA
AVE 0.94 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core O-L PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area C) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area C),
MU
100 80 75 0 75 0 Moderate
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
63 25353207 RCL Only NO ADDRESS 0.95 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core O-L PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area C) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area C),
MU
100 80 76 0 76 0 Moderate
This parcel has parking for an office
building. Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
64 08375117 RCL Only 1826-1842 S
LEWIS ST 0.97 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area A) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area A),
MU
100 80 77 0 77 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
65 08375136 RCL Only 1860 S LEWIS ST 1.85 Yes Mixed-Use Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area A) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area A),
MU
100 80 148 0 148 0 Moderate
This parcel has accessory industrial
buildings and an outdoor storage yard.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
66 08375138 RCL Only
1900 S LEWIS
ST, 917 E GENE

AUTRY WAY

2.01 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area A) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area A),
MU
100 80 160 0 160 0 Moderate
This parcel has industrial buildings and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
67 25353213 RCL Only 2406-2432 E
KATELLA AVE 2.11 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core C-G PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area C) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area C),
MU
100 80 168 0 168 0 Moderate
This parcel has commercial buildings and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
68 25353204 RCL Only 2300 E KATELLA
AVE 3.26 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core O-L PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area C) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area C),
MU
100 80 260 0 260 0 Moderate
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
69 25353208 RCL Only 2460 E KATELLA
AVE 6.02 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core O-L PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area C) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area C),
100 80 481 0 481 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a section of vacant
land and parking for an existing office
building and has the potential to
accommodate future housing
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-53
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
MU development. Exhibits redevelopment
factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
70 03719072 RCL Only 1947-1959 E
LINCOLN AVE 0.15 No Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 7 0 0 7 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a medical office
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
71 03529064 RCL Only 111 N STATE
COLLEGE BLVD 0.15 No Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 7 0 0 7 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
73 03529053 RCL Only 101 N STATE
COLLEGE BLVD 0.16 No Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 7 0 0 7 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a restaurant with
parking. The location of this site near
other residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
74 03719060 RCL Only 1928 E CENTER
ST 0.18 No Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 8 0 0 8 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
75 03719066 RCL Only 1905 E LINCOLN
AVE 0.18 No Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 8 0 0 8 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
76 03528144 RCL Only 1815 E CENTER
ST 0.21 No Mixed-Use
High O-L No Change No Change MU 60 48 10 0 0 10 Above
Moderate
This parcel has an institutional building
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-54 Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
and 4.
78 03528143 RCL Only 115 N COFFMAN
ST 0.26 No Mixed-Use
High O-L No Change No Change MU 60 48 12 0 12 0 Moderate This parcel contains a surface parking lot
associated with a religious institution.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
79 03719071 RCL Only 119 S STATE
COLLEGE BLVD 0.26 No Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 12 0 12 0 Moderate This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
80 03719070 RCL Only 1927-1937 E
LINCOLN AVE 0.32 No Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 15 0 15 0 Moderate This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
81 03719064 RCL Only 1909 E LINCOLN
AVE 0.33 No Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 15 0 15 0 Moderate This parcel contains a restaurant with
parking. The location of this site near
other residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
82 03719068 RCL Only 105 S STATE
COLLEGE BLVD 0.35 No Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 16 0 16 0 Moderate This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
83 03528145 RCL Only 1811 E CENTER
ST 0.36 No Mixed-Use
High O-L No Change No Change MU 60 48 17 0 17 0 Moderate This parcel contains an office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-55 Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
84 03529071 RCL Only 1911-1915 E
CENTER ST 0.38 No Mixed-Use
High O-L No Change No Change MU 60 48 18 0 18 0 Moderate This parcel contains an office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
85 03719073 RCL Only 1921-1925 E
LINCOLN AVE 0.46 No Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 22 0 22 0 Moderate This parcel contains a restaurant with
parking. The location of this site near
other residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
86 03529047 RCL Only 1901 E CENTER
ST 0.47 No Mixed-Use
High O-L No Change No Change MU 60 48 22 0 22 0 Moderate This parcel contains an office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
87 13527104 Existing
GP
3050 W
LINCOLN AVE 0.5 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2017-1
(MU-H)
No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 24 0 24 0 Moderate
This parcel has a commercial building
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4
and 7.
88 07989329 Existing
GP
913 S BEACH
BLVD 0.52 Yes Residential-
Medium
SP 2017-1 (R-
M)
No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 14 14 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4, 6,
and 7.
90 03528146 RCL Only 1775 E LINCOLN
AVE 0.53 Yes Mixed-Use
High O-L No Change No Change MU 60 48 25 0 25 0 Moderate This parcel contains an office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-56
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
91 03528158 RCL Only 1717 E LINCOLN
AVE 0.56 Yes Mixed-Use
High O-L No Change No Change MU 60 48 26 0 26 0 Moderate This parcel contains a medical office
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
92 03529050 RCL Only 121 N STATE
COLLEGE BLVD 0.57 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 27 0 27 0 Moderate This parcel contains an office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
93 34518117 Existing
GP NO ADDRESS 0.59 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 28 0 0 28 Above
Moderate
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. Exhibits
redevelopment factor 7.
94 13745125 Existing
GP
2333 S

MANCHESTER
AVE

0.59 Yes Yes Residential-
Medium C-G RO No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 16 16 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has a commercial building
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
and 4.
95 34512114 Existing
GP
1011 N GROVE
ST 0.61 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 29 0 29 0 Moderate
This parcel is has parking space and an
auto repair building on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
96 34512115 Existing
GP
1081 N GROVE
ST, 3470 E LA

PALMA AVE

0.61 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 29 0 29 0 Moderate
This parcel has parking space and an
auto repair and servicing building on-
site. Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
97 07916423 Existing
GP
735 S BEACH
BLVD 0.63 Yes Residential-
Medium
SP 2017-1 (R-
M) No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 18 18 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

The location of this site near other
residential uses makes it desirable for
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-57
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
housing development. Redevelopment
of this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4, 6
and 7.
98 03529063 RCL Only 125 N STATE
COLLEGE BLVD 0.63 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 30 0 30 0 Moderate This parcel contains parking and a
previously demolished commercial
building site. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
99 07916413 Existing
GP
831 S BEACH
BLVD 0.66 Yes Residential-
Medium
SP 2017-1 (R-
M) No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 19 19 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4,
and 7.
100 13526104 Existing
GP
3036 W
LINCOLN AVE 0.67 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2017-1
(MU-H) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 32 0 0 32 Above
Moderate
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development.
101 07916422 Existing
GP
733 S BEACH
BLVD 0.68 Yes Residential-
Medium
SP 2017-1 (R-
M) No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 19 19 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4,
and 7.
102 12661101 Existing
GP
2912 W
LINCOLN AVE 0.7 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2017-1
(MU-H) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 33 0 33 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4, 6,
and 7.
103 03529067 RCL Only
201-205 N

STATE COLLEGE
BLVD

0.71 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 34 0 34 0 Moderate This parcel contains a restaurant with
parking. The location of this site near
other residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-58 Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
104 26833102 Existing
GP NO ADDRESS 0.73 Yes Yes Residential-
Medium T RO No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 21 21 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a nursery and
outdoor storage yard with parking. The
location of this site near other
residential uses makes it desirable for
housing development. Redevelopment
of this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, and

4. 105 03529060 RCL Only
225-227 N

STATE COLLEGE
BLVD

0.74 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 35 0 35 0 Moderate This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
106 07916412 Existing
GP
837 S BEACH
BLVD 0.75 Yes Residential-
Medium
SP 2017-1 (R-
M)
No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 21 21 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4, 6,
and 7.
107 12611101 Existing
GP
420 S BEACH
BLVD 0.77 Yes Mixed-Use
Medium
SP 2017-1
(MU-M)
No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 22 22 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4, 6,
and 7.
108 07995132 Existing
GP
725 S BEACH
BLVD 0.86 Yes Mixed-Use
Medium
SP 2017-1
(MU-M)
No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 24 24 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7..
109 07995106 Existing 711 S BEACH 0.89 Yes Mixed-Use SP 2017-1 No Change No Change No 36 28.8 25 25 0 0 Low and This parcel contains a commercial Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-59
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
GP BLVD Medium (MU-M) Change Very Low building and outdoor recreation use (batting cages) with parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
110 07995127 Existing
GP
705 S BEACH
BLVD 0.92 Yes Mixed-Use
Medium
SP 2017-1
(MU-M) No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 26 26 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 4, 6
and 7.
111 13745122 Existing
GP
2307 S

MANCHESTER
AVE

0.93 Yes Yes Residential-
Medium C-G RO No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 26 26 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
112 34512111 Existing
GP
1041 N GROVE
ST 0.93 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 44 0 44 0 Moderate
This parcel contains an industrial
building and parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
113 03529077 RCL Only 1919 E CENTER
ST 0.99 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 47 0 47 0 Moderate This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4,
and 6.
114 07995130 Existing
GP NO ADDRESS 1 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2017-1
(MH-H) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 48 0 0 48 Above
Moderate
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. Exhibits
redevelopment factor 7.
115 03529059 RCL Only 1919 1/2 E
CENTER ST 1.01 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change No Change MU 60 48 48 0 48 0 Moderate This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4,
and 6.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-60
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
116 12661118 Existing
GP
2940 W
LINCOLN AVE 1.04 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2017-1
(MH-H) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 49 0 49 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
117 03529074 RCL Only 215 N STATE
COLLEGE BLVD 1.07 Yes Mixed-Use
High O-L No Change No Change MU 60 48 51 0 51 0 Moderate This parcel contains a medical office
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
118 34501112 Existing
GP
1010 N GROVE
ST 1.14 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 54 0 54 0 Moderate
This parcel contains an industrial
building and parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
120 07989333 Existing
GP
907 S BEACH
BLVD 1.28 Yes Residential-
Medium
SP 2017-1 (R-
M) No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 36 36 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
121 13526119 Existing
GP
3030 W
LINCOLN AVE 1.31 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2017-1
(MU-H) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 62 0 62 0 Moderate
This parcel has a commercial building
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4,
and 7..
122 07916414 Existing
GP
821-823 S
BEACH BLVD 1.31 Yes Residential-
Medium
SP 2017-1 (R-
M) No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 37 37 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a hotel with
accessory restaurant and parking. The
location of this site near other
residential uses makes it desirable for
housing development. Redevelopment
of this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4, 6,
and 7.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-61
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
124 34501104 Existing
GP
1070 N GROVE
ST, 3500 E LA

PALMA AVE

1.37 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 65 0 65 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
125 34613202 Existing
GP
1070-1076 N
TUSTIN AVE 1.43 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 68 0 68 0 Moderate
This parcel contains two commercial
restaurant buildings and a parking lot.

The location of this site near other
candidate housing sites and residential
uses makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7..
126 13526117 Existing
GP
3000-3020 W
LINCOLN AVE 1.64 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2017-1
(MU-H) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 78 0 78 0 Moderate
This parcel a commercial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7..
127 12611120 Existing
GP
502-518 S
BEACH BLVD 1.67 Yes Mixed-Use
Medium
SP 2017-1
(MU-M) No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 48 48 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains commercial
buildings with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
128 12603226 Existing
GP
2630 W
LINCOLN AVE 1.71 Yes Yes Residential-
Medium C-G RO No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 49 49 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a hotel with parking.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4,
and 6.
130 34613211 Existing
GP
1032-1064 N
TUSTIN AVE 1.79 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 85 0 85 0 Moderate
This parcel contains an office building
and a parking lot. The location of this
site near other candidate housing sites
and residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-62 Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
131 34613201 Existing
GP
1086-1092 N

TUSTIN AVE,
3800-9822 E LA

PALMA AVE

1.88 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3)
No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 90 0 90 0 Moderate
This parcel contains an office building
and a parking lot. The location of this
site near other candidate housing sites
and residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
132 34613210 Existing
GP
1006-1028 N
TUSTIN AVE 1.88 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3)
No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 90 0 90 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a commercial
building and a parking lot. The location
of this site near other candidate housing
sites and residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
133 34613212 Existing
GP
1000 N TUSTIN
AVE 2.24 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3)
No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 107 0 107 0 Moderate
This parcel contains an office/showroom
building and a parking lot. The location
of this site near other candidate housing
sites and residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
134 07995121 Existing
GP
3030 W
ORANGE AVE 2.26 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2017-1
(MU-H)
No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 108 0 108 0 Moderate
This parcel contains parking lot
associated with a medical office
building. The location of this site near
other residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
135 07995126 Existing
GP
3010 W
ORANGE AVE 2.27 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2017-1
(MU-H)
No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 108 0 108 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a medical office
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-63
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
136 35901180 RCL Only NO ADDRESS 2.3 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G SC No Change No Change SC, MU 60 48 110 0 0 110 Above Moderate
This parcel is a parking lot associated
with a medical office use and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
137 34518116 Existing
GP 1031 N LINK 2.46 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 118 0 118 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a hotel and a
parking lot. The location of this site near
other candidate housing sites and
residential uses makes it desirable for
housing development. Redevelopment
of this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4, 6,
and 7.
138 34518103 Existing
GP
1097 N TUSTIN
AVE 2.65 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2015-1 (DA-
3) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 127 0 127 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a parking lot for
associated commercial buildings. The
location of this site near other candidate
housing sites and residential uses makes
it desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
140 03446033 Existing
GP
1515 W NORTH
ST 3.01 Yes Residential-
Medium RM-4 No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 86 86 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
141 35901176 RCL Only 411 N LAKEVIEW
AVE 3.5 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G SC No Change No Change SC, MU 60 48 168 0 168 0 Moderate This parcel contains medical office
building and a parking lot. The location
of this site near other candidate housing
sites and residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
142 35901175 RCL Only 441 N LAKEVIEW
AVE 3.61 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G SC No Change No Change SC, MU 60 48 173 0 0 173 Above Moderate
This parcel is mostly vacant with a small
section of parking lot for adjacent
medical office use and has the potential
to accommodate future housing
development. Exhibits redevelopment
factors 1, 2, and 4.
143 34518124 Existing 1011-1021 N 6.27 Yes Mixed-Use SP 2015-1 (DA- No Change No Change No 60 48 300 0 300 0 Moderate This parcel contains a large commercial Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-64
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
GP TUSTIN AVE High 3) Change building and a parking lot. The location of this site near other candidate housing
sites and residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
144 13525128 Existing
GP
105-135 N

BEACH BLVD,
3021 W

LINCOLN

8.49 Yes Mixed-Use
High
SP 2017-1
(MU-H) No Change No Change No
Change 60 48 407 0 407 0 Moderate
This parcel contains commercial
buildings and parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
145 23208107 Existing
GP
1301 E

ORANGEWOOD
AVE

0.75 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I
PTMU
(Gateway
Sub-Area A)
No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 37 0 37 0 Moderate
This parcel contains an office building
and parking. Redevelopment of this site
to accommodate housing is feasible as
an individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
146 23208106 Existing
GP
1101 E

ORANGEWOOD
AVE

0.88 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I
PTMU
(Gateway
Sub-Area A)
No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 43 0 43 0 Moderate
This parcel contains an office building
and parking. Redevelopment of this site
to accommodate housing is feasible as
an individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
147 23208122 Existing
GP
1601 E

ORANGEWOOD
AVE

1.07 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I
PTMU
(Gateway
Sub-Area A)
No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 53 0 53 0 Moderate
This parcel contains an office building
and parking. Redevelopment of this site
to accommodate housing is feasible as
an individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
148 23208116 Existing
GP NO ADDRESS 1.09 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core O-L
PTMU
(Gateway
Sub-Area A)
No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 54 0 54 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a section of parking
lot for an affiliated office building.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
149 23208120 Existing
GP NO ADDRESS 1.32 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core O-L
PTMU
(Gateway
Sub-Area A)
No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 65 0 65 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a section of parking
lot for an affiliated office building.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
150 23208119 Existing
GP
1515 E

ORANGEWOOD
AVE, 2060 S

1.7 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core O-L
PTMU
(Gateway
Sub-Area A)
No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 84 0 84 0 Moderate
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-65
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
SANTA CRUZ ST as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
151 23208105 Existing
GP
1535 E

ORANGEWOOD
AVE
2 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core O-L
PTMU
(Gateway
Sub-Area A)
No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 99 0 99 0 Moderate
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
152 23212121 Existing
GP
1605 E GENE
AUTRY WAY 1.04 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I
PTMU (Gene
Autry Sub-
Area C)
No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 73 0 73 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7..
153 23212120 Existing
GP
1919 S STATE
COLLEGE BLVD 8.32 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I
PTMU (Gene
Autry Sub-
Area C)
No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 589 0 589 0 Moderate
This parcel has multiple office buildings
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4,
and 7.
154 08375113 Existing
GP
1000 E KATELLA
AVE 0.79 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area A) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 63 0 63 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
155 08375115 Existing
GP NO ADDRESS 1.19 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area A) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 94 0 94 0 Moderate
This parcel contains an industrial
outdoor storage yard with no structures.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
156 08375101 Existing
GP
1016 E KATELLA
AVE 2.13 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area A) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 170 0 170 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
outdoor storage yard. Redevelopment
of this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4,
and 7..
157 08226134 Existing
GP
1701 E KATELLA
AVE 0.92 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area B) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 52 0 52 0 Moderate
This parcel has a commercial building
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4,
and 7.
158 08226109 Existing
GP
1910-1911 E
WRIGHT CIR 0.99 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area B) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 56 0 56 0 Moderate This parcel has an industrial building and parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-66
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
159 08226112 Existing
GP
1711 S STATE

COLLEGE BLVD,
1981 E WRIGHT
CIR

1.05 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area B) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 59 0 59 0 Moderate
This parcel has a wholesale use in an
industrial building and parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7..
160 08226111 Existing
GP
1951-1961 E
WRIGHT CIR 1.08 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area B) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 61 0 61 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
161 08226108 Existing
GP
1900-1904 E
WRIGHT CIR 1.3 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area B) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 73 0 73 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
162 08226110 Existing
GP
1921-1931 E
WRIGHT CIR 1.38 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area B) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 78 0 78 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
164 08327112 Existing
GP
2131 S DUPONT
DR 0.51 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 33 0 33 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
165 08327110 Existing
GP
2151 S DUPONT
DR 0.51 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 33 0 33 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
166 23201126 Existing
GP NO ADDRESS 0.52 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core O-L PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 34 0 34 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a section of parking
lot for an affiliated office building.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
167 08327104 Existing
GP
2220 S DUPONT
DR 0.58 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 37 0 37 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-67
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
168 08327205 Existing
GP
2191 S DUPONT
DR 0.58 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 37 0 37 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
169 08327105 Existing
GP
2210 S DUPONT
DR 0.6 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 38 0 38 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
170 08327103 Existing
GP
2230 S DUPONT
DR 0.6 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 39 0 39 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
171 08327206 Existing
GP
2221 S DUPONT
DR 0.61 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 39 0 39 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
172 08327207 Existing
GP
2231 S DUPONT
DR 0.77 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 49 0 49 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4 and 7.
173 08327102 Existing
GP
2240 S DUPONT
DR 0.79 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 51 0 51 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
174 08327107 Existing
GP
2198 S DUPONT
DR 1.17 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 75 0 75 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
175 08327113 Existing
GP
2124-2130 E

ORANGEWOOD
AVE

1.27 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 82 0 82 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-68
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
176 08327106 Existing
GP
2200 S DUPONT
DR 1.29 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 84 0 84 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
177 08327101 Existing
GP
2300 E

ORANGEWOOD
AVE

1.47 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 95 0 95 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
178 23201146 Existing
GP
2170 S TOWNE
CENTRE PL 2 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core O-L PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 130 0 130 0 Moderate
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
179 08327108 Existing
GP
2165 S DUPONT
DR 2.09 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core I PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 136 0 136 0 Moderate
This parcel has an industrial/office flex
building and parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
180 23201152 Existing
GP NO ADDRESS 2.09 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core C-G PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 136 0 136 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a section of parking
lot for an affiliated office building.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
181 23201128 Existing
GP
2150 S TOWNE
CENTRE PL 2.26 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core O-L PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 147 0 147 0 Moderate
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
182 23201130 Existing
GP
2190 S TOWNE
CENTRE PL 2.55 Yes Mixed-Use
Urban Core O-L PTMU
(Orangewood) No Change No Change No
Change 100 80 166 0 166 0 Moderate
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
221 08325039 GPA and
RCL
818 E KATELLA
AVE 0.51 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 14 14 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This contains a surface parking lot.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
222 08224204 GPA and 1645 S 0.52 Yes Industrial I SABC Mixed-Use No Change MU 36 28.8 14 14 0 0 Low and This parcel has an industrial building and Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-69
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
RCL CLAUDINA WAY Medium Very Low parking on-site. Redevelopment of this site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
225 25358103 GPA and
RCL
1501 S HARRIS
CT 0.53 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 15 15 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
226 25353101 GPA and
RCL
1650 S STATE
COLLEGE BLVD 0.53 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 15 15 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has a restaurant building and
parking on-site. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7..
227 08325070 GPA and
RCL
T 4 R 10 SEC 26
POR NW1/4 0.54 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 15 15 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and does not
contain any structures. Redevelopment
of this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factor 7.
228 08224203 GPA and
RCL
1631 S

CLAUDINA WAY,
Unit

0.55 Yes Industrial I SABC Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 15 15 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
230 08226120 GPA and
RCL
1000 E HOWELL
AVE 0.57 Yes Office-Low I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 16 16 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7
231 25361107 GPA and
RCL
1650 S SINCLAIR
ST 0.59 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 16 16 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
232 08325046 GPA and
RCL 1815 S LEWIS ST 0.6 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 17 17 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
233 25361104 GPA and 1620 S SINCLAIR 0.62 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use No Change MU 36 28.8 17 17 0 0 Low and This parcel has an industrial building and Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-70
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
RCL ST Medium Very Low parking on-site. Redevelopment of this site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
234 08224118 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 0.62 Yes Public-
Institutional C-G SABC Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 17 17 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development.
235 08226119 GPA and
RCL
1040 E HOWELL
AVE 0.65 Yes Office-Low I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 18 18 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
236 08224205 GPA and
RCL
1655 S

CLAUDINA WAY,
Unit

0.66 Yes Industrial I SABC Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 19 19 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
237 25361105 GPA and
RCL
1630 S SINCLAIR
ST 0.67 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 19 19 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
238 25359210 GPA and
RCL
1550 S SINCLAIR
ST 0.67 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 19 19 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
239 25361106 GPA and
RCL
1640 S SINCLAIR
ST 0.68 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 19 19 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
240 25361203 GPA and
RCL
1621 S SINCLAIR
ST 0.68 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 19 19 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
241 08226117 GPA and
RCL
1140 E HOWELL
AVE 0.71 Yes Office-Low I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 20 20 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
242 08226121 GPA and 1650 S LEWIS ST 0.74 Yes Office-Low I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use No Change PTMU 36 28.8 21 21 0 0 Low and This parcel has an industrial building and Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-71
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
RCL Medium (Office),
MU
Very Low parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
243 08224206 GPA and
RCL
1665 S

CLAUDINA WAY,
Unit

0.77 Yes Industrial I SABC Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 22 22 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
244 08329094 GPA and
RCL
1300 E GENE

AUTRY WAY,
Unit

0.77 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 22 22 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
245 25361205 GPA and
RCL
1641 S SINCLAIR
ST 0.8 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 23 23 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
247 08226118 GPA and
RCL
1100 E HOWELL
AVE 0.8 Yes Office-Low I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 23 23 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
248 25306111 GPA and
RCL
2111 E HOWELL
AVE 0.83 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 23 23 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
249 25358112 GPA and
RCL
1531 S SINCLAIR
ST 0.89 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 25 25 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an institutional building
within an industrial park and parking on-
site. Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
250 08224122 GPA and
RCL
1640 S

CLAUDINA WAY,
Unit

0.9 Yes Industrial I SABC Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 25 25 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
252 25358111 GPA and
RCL
1525 S SINCLAIR
ST 0.9 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 25 25 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-72
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
253 25306121 GPA and
RCL
2211 E HOWELL
AVE 0.93 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 26 26 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
254 08329085 GPA and
RCL
2040 S SANTA
CRUZ ST 0.95 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 27 27 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
255 25358107 GPA and
RCL
1520-1530 S
HARRIS CT 0.95 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 27 27 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
256 08225070 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 0.96 Yes Office-Low I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 27 27 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
257 08329086 GPA and
RCL
2050 S SANTA
CRUZ ST 0.96 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 27 27 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an office building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
258 08224207 GPA and
RCL
1705 S

CLAUDINA WAY,
Unit

0.98 Yes Industrial I SABC Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 28 28 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
259 25359208 GPA and
RCL
1520 S SINCLAIR
ST 0.99 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 28 28 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
260 08224208 GPA and
RCL
1711 S

CLAUDINA WAY,
Unit

0.99 Yes Industrial I SABC Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 28 28 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-73
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
261 25306104 GPA and
RCL
1600 S STATE
COLLEGE BLVD 0.99 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 28 28 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
262 25361204 GPA and
RCL
1631 S SINCLAIR
ST 1.01 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 29 29 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
263 08226116 GPA and
RCL
1200 E HOWELL
AVE 1.03 Yes Office-Low I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 29 29 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
264 25359211 GPA and
RCL
2570 E
CERRITOS AVE 1.04 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 29 29 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an industrial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
265 25358115 GPA and
RCL
2550 E
CERRITOS AVE 1.17 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 33 33 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
266 25358108 GPA and
RCL
2530-2532 E
CERRITOS AVE 1.19 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 34 34 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
267 25361201 GPA and
RCL
1591 S SINCLAIR
ST 1.22 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 35 35 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
268 25361102 GPA and
RCL
1560 S SINCLAIR
ST 1.34 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 38 38 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an industrial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-74
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
269 08224115 GPA and
RCL
517-521 E
KATELLA AVE 1.4 Yes Office-High C-G PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 40 40 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7
270 25358102 GPA and
RCL
1500 S SUNKIST
ST 1.42 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 40 40 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
271 25358101 GPA and
RCL
1550 S SUNKIST
ST 1.46 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 42 42 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
272 25353102 GPA and
RCL
1656-1660 S

STATE COLLEGE
BLVD

1.47 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 42 42 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7..
273 08329069 GPA and
RCL
1190 E
STANFORD CT 1.51 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 43 43 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an industrial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
274 25361202 GPA and
RCL
1601 S SINCLAIR
ST 1.56 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 44 44 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an industrial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-75
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
275 25353103 GPA and
RCL
2020 E HOWELL
AVE 1.64 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 47 47 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
276 08325045 GPA and
RCL
710 E KATELLA
AVE 1.7 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 48 48 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
277 08224114 GPA and
RCL
615-801 E
KATELLA AVE 1.84 Yes Office-High O-L PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 52 52 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
278 25358106 GPA and
RCL
1560-1580 S
HARRIS CT 1.84 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 52 52 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
279 25306107 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 1.87 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 53 53 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an outdoor storage
yard for an industrial business (no
structures on-site). Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
and 4.
281 25306106 GPA and
RCL
2051-2091 E
HOWELL AVE 1.89 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 54 54 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
282 25358116 GPA and
RCL
1555-1565 S
SINCLAIR ST 1.95 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 56 56 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
283 08329109 GPA and 1950-1998 S 1.96 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use No Change PTMU 36 28.8 56 56 0 0 Low and This parcel contains a wholesale retail Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-76
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification

RCL ANAHEIM WAY,
1983 S SANTA
CRUZ ST, 909-
911 E

STANFORD CT
Medium (Office),
MU
Very Low use with office in a building with
parking. The location of this site near
other residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
284 08224209 GPA and
RCL
1721-1771 S
CLAUDINA WAY 1.98 Yes Industrial I SABC Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 57 57 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contain a multi-tenant
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
285 25306102 GPA and
RCL
1530 S STATE
COLLEGE BLVD 2.04 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 58 58 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
286 25361103 GPA and
RCL
1580-1590 S
SINCLAIR ST 2.08 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 59 59 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an industrial
building with parking for an instructional
fitness use. Redevelopment of this site
to accommodate housing is feasible as
an individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
287 08325074 GPA and
RCL
700 E KATELLA
AVE 2.18 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 62 62 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building for wholesale with outdoor
storage yard and parking. The location
of this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
288 25306105 GPA and
RCL
1620-1630 S

STATE COLLEGE
BLVD

2.19 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 63 63 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building for wholesale and outdoor
storage with parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
289 25358105 GPA and
RCL
1541-1551 S
HARRIS CT 2.27 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 65 65 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an industrial
building with parking. The location of
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-77
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
290 25306103 GPA and
RCL
1548-1550 S

STATE COLLEGE
BLVD

2.3 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 66 66 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building for wholesale and outdoor
storage with parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
291 25306122 GPA and
RCL 1600 S PAGE CT 2.36 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 67 67 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building for wholesale and outdoor
storage with parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
292 08225058 GPA and
RCL
1213 E HOWELL
AVE 2.58 Yes Office-Low I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 74 74 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
293 08225088 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 2.86 Yes Office-Low I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 82 82 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
294 25306115 GPA and
RCL 1541 S PAGE CT 2.92 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 84 84 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
296 25362204 GPA and
RCL
2401 E KATELLA
AVE 3.23 Yes Office-High O-H PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 93 93 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
298 25362301 GPA and 1630 S SUNKIST 3.59 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use No Change MU 36 28.8 103 103 0 0 Low and This parcel has an industrial building and Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-78
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
RCL ST Medium Very Low parking on-site. Redevelopment of this site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
299 25362101 GPA and
RCL
1620 S SUNKIST
ST, 1636-1646 S

STADIUM VIEW
AVE, 1645 S

SINCLAIR ST

3.79 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 109 109 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains industrial buildings
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
300 08224112 GPA and
RCL 1701 S LEWIS ST 3.82 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 110 110 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has one industrial building
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
and 4.
301 08225901 GPA and
RCL
1111 E HOWELL
AVE 4.35 Yes Office-Low I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 125 125 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
302 08224113 GPA and
RCL 1771 S LEWIS ST 4.55 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 131 131 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
304 08226115 GPA and
RCL
1212-1222 E
HOWELL AVE 5.25 Yes Office-Low I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 151 151 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
306 08225069 GPA and
RCL 1620 S LEWIS ST 5.75 Yes Office-Low I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 165 165 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
307 08224120 GPA and
RCL
1650 S

CLAUDINA WAY,
511-515 E

KATELLA AVE

5.93 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 170 170 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has two industrial buildings
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-79
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
and 4.
308 25353104 GPA and
RCL
2120 E HOWELL
AVE 6.31 Yes Office-High I PTMU (Office) Mixed-Use
Medium No Change
PTMU
(Office),
MU
36 28.8 181 181 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has six industrial/office flex
buildings and parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
309 25306123 GPA and
RCL 1540 S PAGE CT 8.17 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 235 235 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
310 08224110 GPA and
RCL
1625-1629 S
LEWIS ST 8.59 Yes Industrial I Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 247 247 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel industrial buildings and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
318 07309030 GPA and
RCL
1600-1610 N
LEMON ST, 50-
60 E

ORANGETHORPE
AVE

0.76 Yes Commercial-
Regional C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 21 21 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
319 07309035 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 0.77 Yes Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 22 22 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development.
320 07309046 GPA and
RCL No Address 0.88 Yes Commercial-
Regional C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 25 25 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a section of parking
lot for an associated commercial use.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
and 4.
321 07309043 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 0.96 Yes Commercial-
Regional C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 27 27 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a section of parking
lot for an associated commercial use.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-80
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
and 4.
322 07309037 GPA and
RCL
1440 N LEMON
ST, Unit 0.99 Yes Commercial-
Regional C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 28 28 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a restaurant and
parking on-site. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
323 07309039 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 1.2 Yes Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 34 34 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development.
324 07309045 GPA and
RCL
1460-1480 N
LEMON ST 1.53 Yes Commercial-
Regional C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 44 44 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development.
325 07309050 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 1.67 Yes Commercial-
Regional C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 48 48 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a section of parking
lot for an associated commercial use.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
and 4.
326 07309044 GPA and
RCL
1430 N LEMON
ST 2.39 Yes Commercial-
Regional C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 68 68 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
327 07309041 GPA and
RCL
1520 N LEMON
ST 3.34 Yes Commercial-
Regional C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 96 96 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains commercial
buildings with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
328 07309031 GPA and
RCL
88-96 E

ORANGETHORPE
AVE, 1632 N
LEMON

9.23 Yes Commercial-
Regional C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 265 265 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building. The location of this site near
other candidate housing sites and
residential uses makes it desirable for
housing development. Redevelopment
of this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-81
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
and 4.
347 34938117 GPA and
RCL
5711 E LA
PALMA AVE 0.51 Yes Commercial-
General
SP 2015-1 (DA-
5)
Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 14 14 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building and a parking lot. The location
of this site near other candidate housing
sites and residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. The parcel is part of an
underutilized shopping center, the
Canyon Village Plaza, that struggles to
get and retain tenants. Anchor tenants
are seasonal. It is under common
ownership with Site ID 385. The
shopping center was built in 1977. This
site is part of the cluster of parcels 347,
385. Changing the General Plan from
commercial to mixed use signals the
City’s interest in residential uses and
removes barriers for the construction of
a housing development on this property.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4,
and 7.
349 26803102 GPA and
RCL
200 S RIO VISTA
ST, 2805-2807 E

LINCOLN AVE

0.61 Yes Commercial-
Neighborhood C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 17 17 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an office building
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
351 34938111 GPA and
RCL
5755 E LA
PALMA AVE 0.64 Yes Commercial-
General
SP 2015-1 (DA-
5)
Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 18 18 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial (car
wash) building and a parking lot. The
location of this site near other candidate
housing sites and residential uses makes
it desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
355 26803105 GPA and
RCL
2813-2827 E
LINCOLN AVE 0.84 Yes Commercial-
Neighborhood C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 24 24 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other candidate housing
sites and residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-82
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
357 34908154 GPA and
RCL
5780 E LA
PALMA AVE 1.12 Yes Commercial-
General
SP 2015-1 (DA-
5)
Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 32 32 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is a surface parking lot and
has the potential to accommodate
future housing development. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
358 35919224 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 1.39 Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
C-G SC Mixed-Use
Medium No Change SC, MU 36 28.8 40 40 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial multi-
tenant building and parking on-site. The
location of this site near other candidate
housing sites and residential uses makes
it desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
360 34908169 GPA and
RCL
5750 E LA
PALMA AVE 1.82 Yes Commercial-
General
SP 2015-1 (DA-
5)
Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 52 52 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. Exhibits
redevelopment factor 7.
361 34367106 GPA and
RCL
4679 E
ORCHARD DR 1.84 Yes Residential-
Low Density T Residential-
Medium RM-4 No
Change 36 28.8 52 52 0 0 Low and
Very Low
The location of this site near other
candidate housing sites and residential
uses makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. It is less than a
mile from the Anaheim Canyon Station
and could also provide housing to the
local workforce, including for the Kaiser
Permanente Hospital Campus to the
east and/or for those served by the
Anaheim Regional Center located at the
front of the parcel. Changing the
General Plan from commercial to mixed
use signals the City’s interest in
residential uses and removes barriers for
the construction of a housing
development on all or part of this
property. This site is part of the cluster
with Site ID 381. Exhibits redevelopment
factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
363 35919223 GPA and
RCL
480 N LAKEVIEW
AVE 2.17 Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
C-G SC Mixed-Use
Medium No Change SC, MU 36 28.8 62 62 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development.
364 36018401 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 2.2 Yes Residential-
Low Density T Residential-
Medium RM-4 No
Change 36 28.8 63 63 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a commercial use
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-83
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
365 26803103 GPA and
RCL
2809 E LINCOLN
AVE 2.25 Yes Commercial-
Neighborhood C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 64 64 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an industrial
building with parking. The location of
this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
372 34367201 GPA and
RCL
18192 ORCHARD
DR 3.59 Yes Residential-
Low Density T Residential-
Medium RM-4 No
Change 36 28.8 103 103 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a property
management office use and a majority
vacant (85%) lot. The location of this site
near other candidate housing sites and
residential uses makes it desirable for
housing development. Redevelopment
of this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels. This
site is part of the cluster of parcels 361,
372, 473, 474 that would likely be
consolidated into one project area to
accommodate grade changes and
provide vehicular access. This cluster sits
between the Yorba Linda Lakebed Park
and Glenview Elementary School.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
and 4.
378 34628103 GPA and
RCL
5621-5635 E LA
PALMA AVE 5.53 Yes Commercial-
General
SP 2015-1 (DA-
5)
Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 159 159 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains commercial uses
and a parking lot. The location of this
site near other candidate housing sites
and residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.4,
and 7.
385 34938120 GPA and
RCL
5737-5797 E LA
PALMA AVE 7.86 Yes Commercial-
General
SP 2015-1 (DA-
5)
Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 226 226 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains commercial uses
and a parking lot. The location of this
site near other candidate housing sites
and residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-84
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. The parcel is part of an
underutilized shopping center, the
Canyon Village Plaza, that struggles to
get and retain tenants. Anchor tenants
are seasonal. It is under common
ownership with Site ID 347. The
shopping center was built in 1977. This
site is part of the cluster of parcels 347,
385. Changing the general plan from
commercial to mixed use signals the
City’s interest in residential uses and
removes barriers for the construction of
a housing development on this property.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4,
and 7.
388 12806103 RCL Only 1820 W
LINCOLN AVE 0.65 Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
T No Change No Change RO 18 14.4 9 0 0 9 Above
Moderate
This parcel has a medical office building
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, and

4. 389 12806105 RCL Only 1834 W
LINCOLN AVE 0.66 Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
T No Change No Change RO 18 14.4 9 0 0 9 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains medical offices and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
391 12632111 RCL Only 1239 S
MAGNOLIA AVE 0.9 Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
T No Change No Change RO 18 14.4 12 0 0 12 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a montessori school
with parking. The location of this site
near other residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
392 03529076 RCL Only 1927 E CENTER
ST 1.21 Yes Mixed-Use
High T No Change No Change MU 60 48 58 0 58 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a hotel use and a
parking lot. The location of this site near
other candidate housing sites and
residential uses makes it desirable for
housing development. Redevelopment
of this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 3, 4,
and 6.
393 13407263 RCL Only 141 S KNOTT
AVE 1.53 Yes Residential-
Medium T No Change No Change RO 36 28.8 44 44 0 0 Low and Very Low
This parcel contains a nursing home
building and parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-85
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
394 26833206 RCL Only 2954 E JACKSON
AVE 1.72 Yes Residential-
Medium T No Change No Change RO 36 28.8 49 49 0 0 Low and Very Low
This parcel is mostly vacant and has
some public utility infrastructure on the
site. The location of this site near other
candidate housing sites and residential
uses makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
395 12921237 RCL Only 1438-1444 S
EUCLID ST 1.77 Yes Residential-
Corridor T No Change No Change RO 13 10.4 18 0 0 18 Above Moderate
This parcel has a nursing home building
and parking on-site. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as an individual parcel or
combination with adjacent parcels.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3,
and 4.
396 07056241 RCL Only 527 N DALE AVE 1.84 Yes Residential- Low Density T No Change No Change RO 6.5 5.2 9 0 0 9 Above Moderate
This parcel contains a school with
parking. The location of this site near
other residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, and 4.
397 25318144 RCL Only NO ADDRESS 2.78 Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
T No Change No Change RO 18 14.4 40 0 0 40 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a parking lot
associated with a religious institution.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
398 12834202 RCL Only 1220 S EMPIRE
ST 6.31 Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
T No Change No Change RO 18 14.4 90 0 0 90 Above
Moderate
This parcel has a private school/religious
institution and parking on-site.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
406 03621015
HA and
SA Site /
C-3 RCL
(DA) Only
507 S LEMON ST 0.56 Yes Yes
Residential
Low-Medium
Density
I RO, SABC No Change C3IP (RM-3) No
Overlay 18 14.4 8 0 0 8 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a contractor storage
yard and accessory structures with
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Housing Authority
assembling site for release through
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-86
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
NOA/RFP process Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
411 03702212
HA and
SA Site /
C-3 RCL
(DA) Only
145 W SANTA
ANA ST 1.04 Yes Yes Residential-
Medium I RO, SABC No Change C3IP (RM-4) No
Overlay 36 28.8 29 29 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel has an industrial building and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Housing Authority
assembling site for release through
NOA/RFP process. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
431 03711318
HA and
SA Site /
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
455 E SANTA
ANA ST 0.15 No Residential-
Low Density RM-4 Residential-
Medium C3IP (RM-4) No
Change 36 28.8 4 4 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. Housing
Authority assembling site for release
through NOA/RFP process Exhibits
redevelopment factors 2, 3, 4 and 5.
432 03711333
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
NO ADDRESS 0.03 No Residential-
Low Density RM-4 Residential-
Medium C3IP (RM-4) No
Change 36 28.8 0 0 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development.
433 03711332
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
NO ADDRESS 0.12 No Residential-
Low Density RM-4 Residential-
Medium C3IP (RM-4) No
Change 36 28.8 3 3 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development.
434 07308342
HA and
SA Site /
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
331 W CARL
KARCHER WAY 0.58 Yes Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 27 0 27 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a section of parking
lot associated with a vocational school.

Housing Authority assembling site for
release through NOA/RFP process.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4
and 5.
435 07308334
HA and
SA Site /
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1260 N HARBOR
BLVD 1.23 Yes Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 59 0 59 0 Moderate
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. Housing
Authority assembling site for release
through NOA/RFP process. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 2, 3, 4 and 5.
436 07308341
HA and
SA Site /
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
401 W CARL
KARCHER WAY 2.23 Yes Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 107 0 107 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a school with
parking. The location of this site near
other residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Housing Authority
assembling site for release through
NOA/RFP process. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-87
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
437 07308338
HA and
SA Site /
C-3 GPA
and RCL
(DA)
1301-1315 N
ANAHEIM BLVD 1.94 Yes Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
High C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 93 0 93 0 Moderate
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. Housing
Authority assembling site for release
through NOA/RFP process. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 2, 3, 4 and 5.
447 03407048
HA and
SA Site
GPA and
RCL
1563 W
LINCOLN AVE 0.19 No Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 5 5 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. NOA Released by
Successor Agency on May 2, 2022, HCD
Compliance Letter on Sept 15, 2022.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 2, 3, 4
and 5.
448 03407077
HA and
SA Site
GPA and
RCL
1501 W
LINCOLN AVE 0.69 Yes Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 19 19 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. NOA Released by
Successor Agency on May 2, 2022, HCD
Compliance Letter on Sept 15, 2022
(would develop with APN 034-070-79,
and 80). Exhibits redevelopment factors
2, 3, 4 and 5.
449 03407079
HA and
SA Site
GPA and
RCL
NO ADDRESS 0.01 No Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 0 0 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. NOA Released by
Successor Agency on May 2, 2022, HCD
Compliance Letter on Sept 15, 2022
(would develop with APN 034-070-77)
Exhibits redevelopment factors 2, 4 and

5. 450 03407080
HA and
SA Site
GPA and
RCL
T4S R10W SEC 9
POR OF SE1/4
SW1/4
0 No Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 0 0 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development with combination
of other surrounding parcels. NOA
Released by Successor Agency on May 2,
2022, HCD Compliance Letter on Sept
15, 2022 (would develop with APN 034-
070-77) Exhibits redevelopment factors
2, 3, 4 and 5.
451 03407084
HA and
SA Site
GPA and
RCL
T4S R10W SEC 9
POR OF SE1/4
SW1/4

0.06 No Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 1 1 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a section of a street,
owned by CalTrans. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as combination with adjacent
parcels. NOA Released by Successor
Agency on May 2, 2022, HCD
Compliance Letter on Sept 15, 2022
Exhibits redevelopment factors 2, 3, 4
and 5.
452 03407083
HA and
SA Site
GPA and
RCL
1541 W
LINCOLN AVE 1.21 Yes Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 34 34 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. NOA Released by
Successor Agency on May 2, 2022, HCD
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-88
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
Compliance Letter on Sept 15, 2022
Exhibits redevelopment factors
2, 3, 4 and 5.
453 03407085
HA and
SA Site
GPA and
RCL
T4S R10W SEC 9
POR OF SE1/4
SW1/4

0.22 No Commercial-
General C-G Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 6 6 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a section of a street,
owned by CalTrans. Redevelopment of
this site to accommodate housing is
feasible as combination with adjacent
parcels. Exhibits redevelopment factors
1, 2, 3, and 4.
454 36021206 GPA and
RCL
950-970 N
TUSTIN AVE 2.9 Yes Commercial-
Neighborhood
SP 2015-1 (DA-
4)
Mixed-Use
Medium No Change MU 36 28.8 83 83 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains two flex buildings
and a parking lot. The location of this
site near other candidate housing sites
and residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 4, and 7.
455 25353209 RCL Only 2438 E KATELLA
AVE 0.4 No Mixed-Use
Urban Core C-G PTMU (Katella
Sub-Area C) No Change No Change
PTMU
(Katella
Sub-
Area C),
MU
100 80 32 0 32 0 Moderate
This parcel has a restaurant use and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
456 25111164 C-3 RCL
(DA)
600 W LINCOLN
AVE 0.56 Yes Mixed-Use
High C-G No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 26 0 26 0 Moderate
This parcel has a restaurant use and
parking on-site. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, and 4.
457 03611307 C-3 RCL
(DA) 121 S CITRON ST 0.63 Yes Mixed-Use
High T No Change C3IP (MU-H) No
Change 60 48 30 0 30 0 Moderate
This parcel contains a school with
parking. The location of this site near
other residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2,and 4.
458 26833106 Existing
GP
2930 E

FRONTERA ST,
Unit A

1.75 Yes Yes Residential-
Medium T RO No Change No Change No
Change 36 28.8 50 50 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a plant nursery with
no permanent structures. The location
of this site near other residential uses
makes it desirable for housing
development. Redevelopment of this
site to accommodate housing is feasible
as an individual parcel or combination
with adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 2, 3, and 4.
459 34516135 GPA and
RCL
1391 N
JEFFERSON ST 0.96 Yes Industrial SP 2015-1 (DA-
1)
Residential-
Medium No Change RO 36 28.8 27 27 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an industrial use
and a parking lot. The location of this
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-89
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
site near other candidate housing sites
and residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. The parcel is
underdeveloped with a 15% FAR where
the maximum is 50% FAR. The buildings
were built in 1973. It less than a mile
from the Anaheim Canyon Station and
could also provide housing to the local
workforce in Anaheim Canyon. Changing
the General Plan from industrial to
residential signals the City’s interest in
residential uses and removes barriers for
the construction of a housing
development on this property. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
461 34516106 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 1.71 Yes Industrial SP 2015-1 (DA-
1)
Residential-
Medium No Change RO 36 28.8 49 49 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an outdoor storage
yard (no structures). The location of this
site near other candidate housing sites
and residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 2, 3, 4, and 7.
463 34516105 GPA and
RCL
1395 N
JEFFERSON ST 1.01 Yes Industrial SP 2015-1 (DA-
1)
Residential-
Medium No Change RO 36 28.8 29 29 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a contractors
storage yard/ trucking yard. The location
of this site near other candidate housing
sites and residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
465 34516101 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 3.53 Yes Industrial SP 2015-1 (DA-
1)
Residential-
Medium No Change RO 36 28.8 101 101 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant. The location of this
site near other candidate housing sites
and residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factor 7.
466 34516102 GPA and
RCL
1477 N
JEFFERSON ST 4.14 Yes Industrial SP 2015-1 (DA-
1)
Residential-
Medium No Change RO 36 28.8 119 119 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is mostly vacant with a
modular building on-site. The location of
this site near other candidate housing
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-90
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
sites and residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
468 34516103 GPA and
RCL
1401 N
JEFFERSON ST 4.9 Yes Industrial SP 2015-1 (DA-
1)
Residential-
Medium No Change RO 36 28.8 141 141 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains mainly parking lot
with accessory structures for auto
storage. Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
469 34516104 GPA and
RCL
1397 N
JEFFERSON ST 1.21 Yes Industrial SP 2015-1 (DA-
1)
Residential-
Medium No Change RO 36 28.8 34 34 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains an industrial use
and a parking lot. The location of this
site near other candidate housing sites
and residential uses makes it desirable
for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. The parcel is
underdeveloped with a 13% FAR where
the maximum is 50% FAR. It is less than
a mile from the Anaheim Canyon Station
and could also provide housing to the
local workforce in Anaheim Canyon.

Changing the General Plan from
industrial to residential signals the City’s
interest in residential uses and removes
barriers for the construction of a
housing development on this property.

Exhibits redevelopment factors 1, 2, 3, 4,
and 7.
470 34516128 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 8.99 Yes Industrial SP 2015-1 (DA-
1)
Residential-
Medium No Change RO 36 28.8 258 258 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a parking lot. The
location of this site near other candidate
housing sites and residential uses makes
it desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 2, 3, 4, and 7.
471 34516124 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 1.92 Yes Industrial SP 2015-1 (DA-
1)
Residential-
Medium No Change RO 36 28.8 55 55 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel contains a parking lot. The
location of this site near other candidate
housing sites and residential uses makes
it desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-91
Table B-10 Anaheim Full Sites Inventory
Existing Proposed
Unique
ID APN Category Address Acres
Fifth
Cycle
Site
Sizing
Criteria
General Plan
Land Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-Area)
General
Plan Land
Use
Zoning
(Specific Plan
Development
Area)
Overlay
Zone
(Sub-
Area)
Max
Density
(du/ac)
Assumed
Density
(80% of
Max)
Assumed
Units
(du)
Assumed
Lower
Income
(du)
Assumed
Moderate
Income
(du)
Assumed
Above
Moderate
Income
(du)
Income
Category Justification
adjacent parcels. Exhibits
redevelopment factors 2, 3, 4, and 7.
472 34516133 GPA and
RCL
1320 N TUSTIN
AVE 22.24 No Industrial SP 2015-1 (DA-
1)
Residential-
Mid No Change RO 27 21.6 480 0 0 480 Above
Moderate
This parcel contains a car auction
building and a parking lot. The location
of this site near other candidate housing
sites and residential uses makes it
desirable for housing development.

Redevelopment of this site to
accommodate housing is feasible as an
individual parcel or combination with
adjacent parcels. The parcel is
underdeveloped with a 9% FAR where
the maximum is 50% FAR. It is less than
a mile from the Anaheim Canyon Station
and could also provide housing to the
local workforce in Anaheim Canyon.

Changing the General Plan from
industrial to residential signals the City’s
interest in residential uses and removes
barriers for the construction of a
housing development on all or part of
this property. Exhibits redevelopment
factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7.
473 34306112 GPA and
RCL NO ADDRESS 2.37 Yes Residential-
Low Density T Residential-
Medium RM-4 No
Change 36 28.8 68 68 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. This site is part of
the cluster of parcels 361, 372, 473, 474
that would likely be consolidated into
one project area to accommodate grade
changes and provide vehicular access.

This cluster sits between the Yorba Linda
Lakebed Park and Glenview Elementary
School.
474 34306127 GPA and
RCL 14841 YORBA ST 2.02 Yes Residential-
Low Density T Residential-
Medium RM-4 No
Change 36 28.8 58 58 0 0 Low and
Very Low
This parcel is vacant and has the
potential to accommodate future
housing development. This site is part of
the cluster of parcels 361, 372, 473, 474
that would likely be consolidated into
one project area to accommodate grade
changes and provide vehicular access.

This cluster sits between the Yorba Linda
Lakebed Park and Glenview Elementary
School.

Total Units: 20,448 7,757 10,014 2,677
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-92

5. Alternative Sites
As provided for in Government Code Section 65400(a)(2)(B)(iii), local governments can count existing housing units to address up to 25 percent of their housing need for low and very low income by counting existing units substantially rehabilitated, converted to affordable from market rate, or preserved through the provision of “committed assistance” if those units also meet the requirements of Government Code Section 65583.1(c). Such sites are referred to as Alternate Sites.

As previously provided, the City has identified adequate sites for all income categories and as such provision of Alternative Sites as allowed by 65583.1(c) is not required. However, the City has a long track record of acquiring, rehabilitating and preserving existing housing units for lower income households. As stated in the Housing Rehabilitation Strategy 4A of the Section 4: Housing Policy Programs , the City is continuing to commit to providing resources for the creation of lower income units during the Sixth Planning Cycle in conformance with Government Code Section 65583.1(c) through the Anaheim Housing Authority with subsidy amounts generally ranging from $220,000 to $258,000 per unit. Therefore, the City intends to report such qualifying units toward s the City's annual progress addressing housing need for lower income households. Table B -11 below provides the list of sites with potential acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservations projects to serve as Alternate Sites:

Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-93
Table B-11: Alternate Sites
Funding Source Project Name Development Type Developer Location Estimated Number of Units
Extremely-
Low (30%)
Very-Low
(50%)
Low
(80%)
Moderate
(120%)
Total
Affordable
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Hermosa Village Phase
III Resyndication
Acquisition/
Rehabilitation Related 1515 S. Calle Del Mar 8 46 22 0 76 Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Hermosa Village Phase
IV Rehabilitation
Acquisition/
Rehabilitation Related 1515 S. Calle Del Mar 4 22 10 0 36 Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Avon/Dakota (Phase
III)
Acquisition/
Rehabilitation Related 605-620 Eton 8 13 6 0 27
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Bel'Age Manor Acquisition/
Rehabilitation
Jamboree/Jonathan
Rose 1660 W. Broadway 0 59 119 0 178
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Hermosa Village
(formerly
Jeffrey/Lynne)
Neighborhood
Acquisition/
Rehabilitation Related S/W Corner of
Cerritos and Walnut 35 84 60 0 179
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Avon/Dakota Acquisition/
Rehabilitation TBD
Dakota Street
between South and
Vermont
29 70 49 0 148
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Ariel/Olinda
Neighborhood
Acquisition/
Rehabilitation TBD
S/E Corner of
Danbrook and Knott
Avenue
51 120 84 0 255
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Glen/Neighbors Acquisition/
Rehabilitation TBD N/W Corner of Euclid
and La Palma Avenue 72 170 120 0 362
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Guinida Lane Acquisition/
Rehabilitation TBD
Guinida
Lane/Midway and
Anaheim Blvd.
53 124 88 0 265
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Balsam/Curtis Acquisition/
Rehabilitation TBD
S/E Corner of
Placentia and State
College Blvd.
34 80 56 0 170
Appendix B: Adequate Sites Analysis Page B-94
Table B-11: Alternate Sites
Funding Source Project Name Development Type Developer Location Estimated Number of Units
Extremely-
Low (30%)
Very-Low
(50%)
Low
(80%)
Moderate
(120%)
Total
Affordable
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Anna Drive Acquisition/
Rehabilitation TBD
S/E Corner of Anna
Drive and la Palma
Avenue
55 131 92 0 278
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Alameda/Brownwood
/Catalina (ABC)
Acquisition/
Rehabilitation TBD
S/S Corner of
Brookhurst and
Alameda
53 126 89 0 268
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Rose/Bush/Vine Acquisition/
Rehabilitation TBD S/W Corner of East
and Sycamore 93 220 154 0 467
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Haster/
Orangewood
Acquisition/
Rehabilitation TBD N/E Corner Haster
and Orangewood 173 407 286 0 866
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Park Lane Acquisition/
Rehabilitation TBD
N/W Corner of
Lawrence and
Miraloma Way
89 209 147 0 445
Low Mod Funds leveraged with
State and Federal Tax Credit and
other available funding sources
Benmore/
Canfield
Acquisition/
Rehabilitation TBD
S/E Corner of
Benmore Lane and
Acacia Street
76 180 127 0 383
Rental Rehabilitation Total: 833 2,061 1,509 0 4,403
Filing Deadline* Decision By Filing Deadline* Decision By (TUES) (TUES) (TUES) (TUES)
1/6/2026 1/20/2026 7/21/2026 8/4/2026
1/13/2026 1/27/2026 7/28/2026 8/11/2026
1/20/2026 2/3/2026 8/4/2026 8/18/2026
1/27/2026 2/10/2026 8/11/2026 8/25/2026
2/3/2026 2/17/2026 8/18/2026 9/1/2026
2/10/2026 2/24/2026 8/25/2026 9/8/2026
2/17/2026 3/3/2026 9/1/2026 9/15/2026
2/24/2026 3/10/2026 9/8/2026 9/22/2026
3/3/2026 3/17/2026 9/15/2026 9/29/2026
3/10/2026 3/24/2026 9/22/2026 10/6/2026
3/17/2026 3/31/2026 9/29/2026 10/13/2026
3/24/2026 4/7/2026 10/6/2026 10/20/2026
3/31/2026 4/14/2026 10/13/2026 10/27/2026
4/7/2026 4/21/2026 10/20/2026 11/3/2026
4/14/2026 4/28/2026 10/27/2026 11/10/2026
4/21/2026 5/5/2026 11/3/2026 11/17/2026
4/28/2026 5/12/2026 11/10/2026 11/24/2026
5/5/2026 5/19/2026 11/17/2026 12/1/2026
5/12/2026 5/26/2026 11/24/2026 12/8/2026
5/19/2026 6/2/2026 12/1/2026 12/15/2026
5/26/2026 6/9/2026 12/8/2026 12/22/2026
6/2/2026 6/16/2026 12/15/2026 12/29/2026
6/9/2026 6/23/2026 12/22/2026 1/5/2027
6/16/2026 6/30/2026 12/29/2026 1/12/2027
6/23/2026 7/5/2023* 1/5/2027 1/19/2027
6/30/2026 7/14/2026 1/12/2027 1/26/2027
7/7/2026 7/21/2026 1/19/2027 2/2/2027
7/14/2026 7/28/2026 1/26/2027 2/9/2027
Dec. 2025
Z212(714) 765-5139 Phone (714) 765-5280 Fax www.anaheim.net/planning 2026 ADMINISTRATIVE & REGULATORY

PERMIT FILING SCHEDULE

PLANNING SERVICES DIVISION
*All required application materials and fees must be submitted and paid by close of business on the filing deadline date
**Date adjusted for holiday
200 S. Anaheim Blvd., Suite 162, Anaheim, California 92805 To submit online, visit the Submittal Instructions website www. anaheim.net/5756. Administrative and Regulatory permit applications may also be submitted in-person by appointment at the Planning Services Division Counter at City Hall. Digital format of application materials are required for in-person submittal.

Contact Eibet Olmedo at [email protected] or 714-765-5139 for questions or to schedule a submittal appointment.

ATTACHMENT 2G
(APPENDIX 3)
l \ 1 1 • i i

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADDING SECTION

1. 08. 100 TO CHAPTER 1. 08 OF THE ANAHEIM

MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING THE

ANAHEIM LOCAL HOUSING TRUST FUND
WHEREAS, on April 2, 2024, Housing and Community Development staff presented background information to the City Council on the continuing need for funding and policies to addressaffordable housing needsin Anaheim, and following arobust discussion, the City Council directed staff to advance strategiesto increase funding for future programming to addresslocal housing needsin the form of an Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund (A- LHTF); and WHEREAS, based on City Council feedback and research, it was determined that the A- LHTF should be structured as a public model, which provides the ability for the City Council to serve as an oversight body, ensuring that no funds are expendedwithout prior approval, and the Director of Housing and Community Development, or designee, should serveasthe administrator of the LHTF, with the Director' s administrative responsibilities set forth in the A- LHTF program guidelines to be presentedfor future City Council approval; and WHEREAS, a primary function of many LHTFs is to provide gap financing for the development of new affordable housing units, City leadershipwill have the opportunity to direct staff on the priorities deemed appropriate for Anaheim, based on the source of funds received; and, WHEREAS, once further funding resources are defined, staff will return to City Council with operatingguidelines for the A-LHTF, a five- year plan that setsout program priorities, aswell as a budget request to access funds in the A- LHTF; and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the City will have accessto flexible funding, which will be recommendedfunding sourcesfor the A-LHTF; and
WHEREAS, on August 14, 2018, the City Council adopted, by Resolution, an Affordable Housing Policy Statement, which declares that addressing the City' s affordable housing needs is a priority, and established a voluntary, incentive -based approach to promote and facilitate affordable housing development, including the Housing Ambassador Program, which to date has resulted in developersmaking voluntary financial contributions totaling $561,000, to be used at the City' s discretion; and
WHEREAS, on May 7, 2024, the City Council unanimously approved DisneylandForward, a $1.9 billion, 10 -year expansionplan for the Disneyland Resort, including Disney' s commitment to a $30 million contribution to affordable housing in Anaheim, and it was anticipated that these funds would be deposited in the new A- LHTF; and,
ATTACHMENT 4B
(APPENDIX 3)
WHEREAS, in October2023, the City respondedto aNotice of Funding Opportunity from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for the newly created Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing ( PRO Housing) program authorized and funded by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, which allows granteesto use awardsto further develop, evaluate, andimplement housing policy plans, improve housing strategies, andfacilitate affordable housing production andpreservation, and on June26, 2024, Anaheim was selectedasone of only 21 jurisdictions to receive this highly competitive grant funding in the amount of $ 3,497,200, including $ 1,000,000 in seedfunding for the A- LHTF; and, WHEREAS, another potential source of funds for the A- LHTF is the State of California' s Local Housing Trust Fund program, which provides a matching grant ( dollar for dollar) to local housing trust funds that are funded on an ongoing basis from both private andpublic contributions or public sources; and,
WHEREAS, as outlined in the City' s draft 2021-2029 Housing Element, under Section 4 of the plan entitled Housing Policy Program, the City may establish an Affordable Housing Development Fee, which is proposed to apply to specific sites described in the Housing Element, to support the A- LHTF.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.

Chapter 1. 08 ( Funds) of the Anaheim Municipal Code is amended to add Section 1. 08. 100, which shall read in its entirety as follows:

Section 1. 08. 100 — Local Housing Trust Fund
010 Establishment and Pug]ose. The City Council hereby establishes the City of Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund (" LHTF") to provide assistancein developing and maintaining affordable housing in the City.
020 Fundinc Sources. The LHTF shall
contributions and grant opportunities
other legally available source.
030 Eligible Uses: Guidelines.
receive funding from voluntary developer
The LHTF may also receive funds from any
0301 Generally. Funds deposited in the LHTF, and all interest thereon, shall be used to increase, improve, and preserve the City' s supply of affordable housing.
0302 Guidelines. The terms and conditions governing the City' s expenditure of funds from the LHTF shall be set forth in guidelines adopted by the City Council (" Guidelines"). Among other things, the Guidelines shall establish eligible project types, eligible and ineligible costs, funding criteria and priorities, typical loan terms, and the application process. Adoption of the Guidelines, and any amendments, shall be by City Council resolution. 0303 City Council Approval. Notwithstanding subsection . 0302 ( Guidelines) above, all expenditures from the LHTF shall require City Council approval. 040 Administration.
0401 Housin,, and Community Development Department. The Director of Housing and Community Development, or designee, shall serve as the administrator of the LHTF. The Director' s administrative responsibilities shall be set forth in the Guidelines.
0402 Finance Department. The Finance Director/ City Treasurer, or designee, shall provide financial managementand accounting servicesfor the LHTF.

In addition to any responsibilities provided in the Guidelines, these responsibilities shall include: disbursing and collecting LHTF funds; maintaining and managing a separate account or accounts for LHTF funds; and, maintaining financial records for the LHTF.
050 Annual Report. The Director of Housing and Community Development, or designee, shall prepare and present an annual report to the City Council regarding the activities undertaken with funds from the LHTF in the previous year and any other topics required by the Guidelines.

SECTION 2.

The City Council of the City of Anaheim hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence, phrase, term or word of this ordinance be declared for any reason to be invalid; it is the intent of the City Council that it would have adopted all other portions of this ordinance independent of the elimination of any such portion as may be declared invalid. If any section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one (or more) section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase had been declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 3.

The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be printed once within fifteen ( 15) days after its adoption in the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper of generalcirculation, published and circulated in the City of Anaheim andthirty ( 30) daysfrom and after its final passage, it shall take effect and be in full force.

THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at aregular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 13 day of August , 2024, and thereafter passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 20 day of August ; 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Mayor Aitken and Council Members Kurtz, Diaz,
Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel and Meeks
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

CITY OF ANAHEIM
By: aQ7 1.

MAYOR OF I CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATT T:
4AITYCLERKOF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

CLERK' S CERTIFICATE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, THERESA BASS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original Ordinance No. 6588 introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 13th day of August. 2024, and that the same was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the
20th
day of August, 2024, by the following
vote of the members thereof:

AYES: Mayor Aitken and Council Members Kurtz, Diaz, Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel and Meeks
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21Stof August, 2024. o

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
SEAL)
ANAHEIM BULLETIN R. EwsE See Proof on Next Page
Anaheim Bulletin
1920 Main St. Suite 225
Irvine , California 92614
7141 796- 2209
200 S. Anaheim Blvd., Suite 217
Anaheim, California 92805

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Orange County
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a parry to or interested in the above - entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper that has been adjudged to be a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Orange County, State of California, on December 28, 1951, Case No. A- 21021 in and for the City of Anaheim, County of Orange County, State of California; that the notice, of which the annexed is a true printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit:
08/ 29/ 2024
I certify ( or declare) under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct:

Executed at Anaheim, Orange County, California, on
Date: Aug 29, 2024.

SWTiiure
ORD - 6588 ( 5190168) - Page 1 of 2

SUMMARY PUBLICATION

CITY OF ANAHEIM
ORDINANCE NO. 6588
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADDING SECTION 1. 08. 100 TO CHAPTER

1. 08 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING THE ANAHEIM LOCAL HOUSING TRUST FUND This ordinance adds section 1.08. 100 to chapter 1. 08 of the Anaheim Municipal Code establishing the Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund, and provides direction regarding funding sources, eligible uses of the funds, and administration of the Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund.

I, Theresa Bass, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Is a summary of Ordinance No. 6588, which ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim on the 13th day of August, 2024 and was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Council on the 20th day of August, 2024 by the following rol I cal I vote of the members thereof:

AYES: Mayor Aitken and Council Members Kurtz, Diaz, Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel and Meeks NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
The above summary Is a brief description of the sublect matter contained In the text of Ordinance No. 6588 which has been prepared pursuant to Section 512 of the Charter of the City of Anaheim. This summary does not Include or describe every provision of the ordinance and should not be relled on as a substitute for the ful I text of the ordinance.

To obtain a copy of the full text of the ordinance, please contact the Office of the City Clerk, ( 714) 763- 5166, between 8: 00 AM and 5: 00 PM, Monday through Friday. There Is no charge for the copy.

Anaheim Bulletin
Published: 6/ 29/ 24
ORD - 6588 ( 5190168) - Page 2 of 2

CLERK' S CERTIFICATE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, THERESA BASS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original Ordinance No. 6588 and was published in the Anaheim Bulletin on the 29t' day of August, 2024, pursuant to Section 512 of the City Charter of the City of Anaheim.

ITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
SEAL)
Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 0
ADOPTED ON MAY 29, 2025
ATTACHMENT 4C
(APPENDIX 3)
Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Executive Summary
II. Background
III. Local Need
IV. Eligible Projects and Programs
A. Build More Homes Initiative
B. First-Time Homeowners Program
C. Housing Stability Program
V. Administration
VI. Funding Sources and Financial Management
VII. Monitoring and Evaluation

APPENDICES
A. Allocation Plan
B. Overview of Optional Programs
C. Homelessness Prevention and Stabilization Pilot Program D. City of Anaheim Senior Safety Net Program Policies and Procedures Faces of Anaheim Homeownership
Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 1
I. Executive Summary
The Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund (A-LHTF) was officially established on August 20, 2024, through the adoption of Anaheim Municipal Code Section 1.08.100.

As initially contemplated by the City Council, the purpose of the A-LHTF is to advance the development of affordable housing and related programs in Anaheim. Potential activities such as gap financing and land acquisition for affordable rental housing, downpayment assistance to homebuyers, and housing stability programs such as eviction prevention assistance were all considered as part of the adoption discussion.

The A-LHTF is designed to receive and invest public and private contributions, including local in-lieu fees, state and federal housing grants, and philanthropic donations, to implement strategic housing solutions. Anaheim’s historical investments have produced over 6,000 units since 1978.

Yet the need remains critical: over 35,000 households remain on the Section 8 waitlist, and rent levels continue to exceed what low-income households and seniors can reasonably afford.

To address these needs, the A-LHTF will invest in three primary program areas:
• Build More Homes Initiative: Funds the development and rehabilitation of affordable rental and for-sale housing to increase the city’s long-term supply. • First-Time Homeowners Program: Offers financial support for low- and moderate- income households to purchase their first home in Anaheim. • Housing Stability Program: Provides one-time emergency assistance to prevent displacement of low-income seniors and families at risk of eviction or homelessness.

These guidelines outline the framework for administering the A-LHTF, including program eligibility, investment criteria, financial controls, monitoring and reporting requirements, and the City’s ongoing role in implementation and oversight.

Together, the A-LHTF and these program guidelines represent Anaheim’s renewed commitment to housing opportunity and stability, providing a flexible platform to meet local housing needs today and into the future.

Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 2
II. Background
As has been widely documented, the State of California has a statewide housing affordability crisis, which also manifests at the local level. While the issue has received much media and political attention in recent years, it has been developing for decades. The shortage of housing stock is often cited as the root cause of rising housing costs, increased homelessness, and other social and economic problems.

Historically, the City of Anaheim (City), through a variety of programs and incentives, has provided a broad spectrum of housing options for persons who live and/or work in Anaheim.

Since 1978, the City’s efforts have resulted in the creation of over 6,000 units, both rental and homeownership, including 5,742 affordable units. In 2005, the City Council adopted the Affordable Housing Strategic Plan (the “Strategy”), which set a goal of constructing 1,200 affordable housing units for very low to moderate-income households. City staff met this goal, and subsequently, the goal was adjusted to 2,700 units to be delivered between 2009 through 2014. The City was well on track to meet and possibly even exceed that goal when a significant funding stream, the Redevelopment Housing Set-Aside fund, was eliminated.

On February 1, 2012, the State of California dissolved redevelopment. Prior to dissolution, the City of Anaheim generally received approximately $15-$17 million per year from tax increment funds for affordable housing production. In the aftermath of the dissolution, there has been a dearth of resources to continue affordable housing production at the scale that previously was possible. To put this into context, the only remaining, reliable source of funding for affordable housing production in the decade that followed the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency was the federal HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) program. However, the HOME program also experienced a significant disinvestment during roughly the same period, that is, program funding was reduced by 50 percent between FY 2010 and FY 2016, such that the Anaheim allocation went from $2,240,380 to $1,067,408. For FY 2024, the City’s HOME allocation is $1,314,087.60.

Following significant industry advocacy to re-establish some sort of local recurring fund, State legislators passed the Building Homes and Jobs Act (SB 2, 2017), establishing a $75 recording fee on real estate documents to increase the supply of affordable homes in California. These funds established the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) fund, which generates approximately $3 million annually for Anaheim as of 2019. When combined with HOME funds, annual recurring sources of funds for housing production total approximately $4.6 million annually. The Anaheim cash contribution, also referenced as gap financing, has averaged $6 million, based on the cost of two latest affordable housing developments, Finamore Place (completed in February 2022) and Miraflores Apartments. It is important to recognize that there are additional City costs associated with the production of affordable housing, such as site acquisition and environmental mitigation actions that are not part of the gap financing figure, as these are generally incurred in advance of providing the soft financing assistance. It is also further noted that HOME funds can be used for various housing interventions, and a large Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 3
portion of these funds are pre sently committed to preventing home lessness in the form of tenant- based
rental assistance.

On August 20, 2024, Ci ty Council adopted Ordinance No. 6588, establishing the Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund (A-LHTF) to pr ovide assistance in developing and maintaining affordable housing. The A-LHTF est ablishes a locally-controlled mechanism to receive federal and state affordable
housing grants, local developer contributions, in-lieu fees, and potential philanthropic donations to further Anaheim’s affordable housing
initiatives.

On May 29, 2025, City Council approved the program guidelines and allocation plan for the Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund (A-LHTF) authorizing City staff to proceed with implementing the activities outlined in these guidelines.

III. Loca
l Need
As of the writing of these guidelines, Anaheim residents’ need for affordable rental and homeownership housing can be best understood through two general indicators – housing cost burden and affordable program wait lists and interest lists. For context, the most recent United States Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) data estimates there are 340,505 residents in Anaheim occupying 109,885 housing units with 60,647 being rental units (55.2%) and 49,238 homeowner units (44.8%).

Housing Cost Burden
For housing costs to be considered affordable, a household’s total housing costs should not exceed 30 percent of household income, according to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Households that spend more than 50 percent of their income on housing costs are defined as “extremely housing cost burdened.” Housing cost burden can impact both rental and homeownership households. The following exhibits outline that extreme cost burden impacts approximately 33 percent of renters and 13 percent of homeowners citywide.

Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 4
Affor
dable Program Wait Lists and Interest Lists
To better understand local needs, staff reviewed these housing waiting lists and ran affordability scenarios for two highly representative groups: seniors and low wage workers. The data below highlights the extent of unmet demand for affordable housing programs in Anaheim:
• Over 35,000 households are on the combined Anaheim Section 8 Housing Choice V oucher program waiting lists
• Approximately 5,000 households on the Affordable Housing interest list

Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 5
This demand is compounded by a severe affordability gap. According to the Social Security Administration, the latest average Social Security monthly income for a senior is $1,839.83.

Based on recent data available on Rent.com and Rent Café, the average rent for a studio in Anaheim is $1,947.

The average rent for a one-bedroom apartment in Anaheim is currently $2,078. For individuals working a minimum-wage job, or $16.50/hour, assuming full time work, the average rent for a one-bedroom apartment represents 78.7 percent of gross earnings.

In response to this need, the Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund (A-LHTF) is structured around three core investment areas designed to increase the supply of affordable housing, expand homeownership opportunities, and prevent displacement of vulnerable residents.

The following A-LHTF Guidelines include an overview of the following: eligible projects and programs; administration and oversight of funds; funding sources and financial management protocols; and monitoring and evaluation procedures.

IV . Eli
gible Projects and Programs
The A-LHTF includes three primary eligible projects and programs, also referred to as investment “buckets,” to achieve the Fund’s objectives – Build More Homes Initiative, First- Time Homeowners Program, and Housing Stability Program. Funding amounts in each investment bucket are included in Appendix A.

A. Baseline Criteria
All eligible projects and programs shall adhere to the following baseline criteria:
1) Anaheim Live/Work Preference - In an effort to support existing Anaheim residents and employers, all projects and programs shall continue the Anaheim Housing Authority’s policy of including a preference for program participants to either currently reside continuously in Anaheim for the past 12 months or currently work in Anaheim continuously for the past 12 months.
a) Assistance under the Housing Stability Program is only for Anaheim residents living within the City of Anaheim limits.
2) Project or housing unit must be located within the City of Anaheim 3) Trust funds should be leveraged with other city, state, federal or philanthropic sources, where possible.
4) Geographically Distributed Funds – Funding Allocation Plans should strive to expend Trust funds between the six Council Districts, when feasible. Certain funding “buckets” that correlate to existing affordable housing developments may not be able to achieve geographic funding parity. For citywide programs, such as the First-Time Homeowners Program, staff should make best efforts to inform potential program participants in all Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 6
Council Districts.

B. Primary Investment “Buckets”
The following outlines the three primary investment “buckets” including target beneficiaries, project types, eligible uses, and affordability requirements. 1) Build More Homes Initiative
The production of more housing units that individuals and families can afford to rent or buy continues to be a primary strategy in achieving the City’s goal of increasing livability in the 2025 Strategic Plan. The City’s Housing and Community Development Department has a longstanding history of facilitating the production of more housing units through assembling sites for development and/or providing gap financing. The Build More Homes Initiative seeks to build upon the City’s legacy and provide Trust funds to support the various activities necessary to build more homes that residents can afford, inclusive of rental development and homeownership developments.
a) Target Beneficiaries:
i) Workforce (individuals and families)
ii) Households Experiencing Homelessness (individuals and families) iii) Active Older Adults (55+ years of age)
iv) Special Needs (e.g., Transitional Aged Youth, persons with disabilities, persons with AIDS).
b) Project Types:
i) New construction rental housing (including integrated, ancillary community - serving spaces)
ii) New construction for-sale housing (including integrated, ancillary community serving spaces)
iii) Adaptive reuse of non-residential buildings (motel, office, etc.) iv) Substantial rehabilitation of existing multifamily housing c) Eligible Uses
i) Acquisition of future development sites and associated costs (closing costs, property taxes, relocation, etc.)
ii) Site preparation costs (environmental assessments and clean-up, demolition, property maintenance/security, etc.)
iii) Gap financing (based on financial analysis)
iv) Ineligible Uses: Trust funds may not be used for transitional housing, group homes, temporary housing, and/or homeless shelters.

Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 7
d) Affordability Requirements:
i) Affordability requirements of l everaged funding sources shall apply. ii) In the event leveraged funding sources do not have affordability requirements, the City shall determine necessary affordability requirements on a project-by- project basis to ensure the funds provide long-term impact. e) Fund Reimbursement:
i) All expended funds shall be accrued on a per project basis and structured as a loan to the project. Loans will carry a simple interest rate of 4% and be repaid through a split of residual receipts once the development has stabilized. ii) All reimbursed loans shall be deposited back into the Trust to be reused for a future development.
f) Leveraging of Funds:
i) A-LHTF shall be leveraged with other federal, state, local funding sources for gap financing and strategic acquisitions. A-LHTF funds shall not exceed 50% of total City investment.
2) First-Time Homeowners Program
The Anaheim Downpayment Assistance Program provides first time homebuyers the opportunity to purchase a home in Anaheim through a $50,000 downpayment assistance loan. The purpose of the Program is to facilitate access to home ownership opportunities for those households that can qualify for a primary mortgage, except where market prices are out of reach, or they lack sufficient down payment funds.

This new program is designed to help households that do not qualify for existing programs but face challenges in achieving homeownership due to high market prices or insufficient down payment funds.
a) Target Beneficiaries:
i) Household income may not exceed 150% of the area median income for Orange County.
ii) First-time homebuyers who have not had an ownership interest in any real property at any time during the last three (3) years.
iii) Must be pre-qualified for a fixed-rate First Mortgage. b) Project Types:
i) The property must be defined as a single-family residential property (Single- Family Home, Townhome, or Condominium).
ii) Must meet lender mortgage guidelines.
c) Eligible Uses:
i) First-time homebuyer must occupy the property as a primary residence; non- occupant co-borrowers are not allowed.

Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 8
d) Affordability and Application Requirements:
i) First-time homebuyer must contribute a minimum of 3% but no more than 20% of the home purchase price toward the down payment. Of that amount, up to 5% of the home purchase price may come from family gift funds. ii) First-time homebuyer shall cover all closing costs. iii) City loan funds must be applied towards downpayment only. iv) In-Person Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Approved homebuyer education and counseling is required for one occupying first-time homebuyer.
v) Home purchase price may not exceed the average home purchase price in Anaheim which will be determined and updated by the City on a quarterly basis. e) Fund Reimbursement:
i) Structured as a 30-year fixed mortgage loan bearing a 3% simple interest rate - requiring no monthly payments.
ii) Repayment is due when the home is no longer owner-occupied, the property is sold or the title is transferred.
iii) Refinancing of the first mortgage is permitted only to lower the interest. Any cash-out refinancing will trigger repayment of the loan. 3) Housing Stability Program
Since 2020, the City offers emergency assistance through the COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance (ERAP) Senior Safety Net (SSNP) programs, funded by one-time COVID-19 relief, Housing Set Aside and V oluntary Developer Donations funds.

From July 2022 to June 2024, after the end of California's eviction moratorium, Anaheim's ERAP highlighted the continued need for rental among family households.

With more than 1,400 unique households requesting assistance at this time, 32% of households at or below 50% AMI reported facing imminent eviction and housing instability by receiving a pay or quit or eviction notice from their landlord. Similarly, since the inception of the SSNP, there has been an increasing number of households requesting emergency assistance with 200 households awarded assistance over the past 5 years. However, these programs lack ongoing funding to be sustainable, and hold several limitations from age, household type, and ties to pandemic-related financial hardships.

To offer ongoing support to Anaheim families and seniors, the Housing Stability Program would include two tranches for each population including the creation of a new program for families and supplemental funding for the existing senior program.

Housing Stability Assistance Program for Families
This program will assist eligible family households address emergency, short-term circumstances impacting their housing status. The purpose of the program is to promote Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 9
housing stability among low-income families by providing one-time financial assistance in an amount not to exceed $5,000 to prevent housing displacement, eviction, and homelessness.
a) Target Beneficiaries:
i) Very low-income (at or below 50% of the Orange County Area Median Income) family households (24 CFR § 5.403; 42 USC 1437a(b)(3)) residing in Anaheim facing imminent housing instability or a recent destabilizing event and do not actively receive subsidized rental assistance.
b) Eligibility Requirements
i) Be a City of Anaheim renter for the last 12 months (owners, subleases, motel tenants, and residents in unincorporated Anaheim are not eligible for this program)
ii) Have a documented risk of imminent housing instability or recent destabilizing event (see Documentation Requirements)
iii) Have a household income of 50% or below the Orange County Area Median Income
iv) Demonstrate ability to maintain housing stability beyond assistance period. v) Confirmation of non-duplicate benefit of other emergency assistance or subsidy program
c) Documentation Requirements:
i) Complete Program Application
ii) Proof of Residence in City of Anaheim for past 12 months, which may include:
• Current and Complete Lease Agreement
• Anaheim Public Utility Bill
• Documentation included under Proof of Income or Applicant Identity iii) Proof of Income
• Two Months of complete and non-redacted Bank Statements, or • Pay stubs for all employed members of an Eligible Household (one month), or
• Unemployment statements or benefits letters, or
• Social Security and Social Security Disability Insurance statements or benefits letters
• Most recent household tax return (If a household is not required to complete a tax return, then a Form W-2, a Form 1099-MISC, or other tax statements for the Eligible Household, members may be substituted) vi) Proof of Applicant Identity.

All household members shall be listed by name on the application and household members over 18 years old shall provide proof of identity.

Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 10
Acceptable documentation for identity verification comes in several forms, including:
• A form of government-issued identification, such as a birth certificate or driver’s license
• Foreign identification documents, such as passports, or driver IDs • An employment identification card from the applicant’s employer • Certificate of marriage or license
• Certified copy of divorce decree
• Copy of a certified, court-ordered maintenance award (if legal) or a notarized statement declaring separation
• Public Assistance participation documentation
• A tax return or other tax document that includes the applicant’s name • A utility or other bill with complete name and address that is consistent with application. School transcripts or other enrollment form with complete name and address that is consistent with application. vi) Documentation of imminent housing instability or recent destabilizing event.

This is a non-exhaustive list and may vary depending on applicant circumstances.
• Signed Pay or Quit or Eviction Notice from landlord
• At Fault Eviction due to nonpayment of rent - Unlawful Detainer or Judgement
• Loss of job – Notice of Separation Letter from Employer on Employer Letterhead or Employee Development Department (EDD) Notice of Unemployment Insurance Award or Denial
• Medical Expense – Medical Bill
• Natural Disaster – Insurance Claim
• Victim of domestic violence – Form HUD-5382
vi) Landlord Participation and Payment Information
• Written Verification of Landlord Participation
• Complete and Signed W-9 Form
• Proof of Ownership
ο Property deed
ο Mortgage note
ο Complete and non-redacted tax return with a completed Schedule E form
ο Property insurance.
d) Payment Types:
i) For households facing imminent housing instability, such as an eviction, one-time rental arrears assistance that does not exceed two months of rental arrears in an amount not to exceed $5,000 paid directly to the landlord Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 11
ii) For households facing a recent destabilizing event, one-time emergency assistance may be granted as security deposit assistance in an amount not to exceed $5,000 paid directly to the landlord
e) Application
i) Direct referral from City staff or nonprofit agency presently contracted with the City of Anaheim
ii) Applications will be processed on a first-come, first-served basis until funds are depleted
f) Notification
i) Application Selection and Documentation Request
ii) Confirmation of Participation and Issuance of Landlord Agreement iii) Final Determination to Applicant (Award or Denial) g) Administration
i) Application Review and Determination administered by City staff • City staff administration expenditures will be leveraged to the extent possible with federal, state, and local grant funds
h) Marketing
i) The City will advertise this program through the City and A-LHTF website and referring partner agencies.

Supplement to Senior Safety Net Program - Emergency Assistance The Senior Safety Net Program (SSNP) was enacted in February 2020 to assist eligible older adults to address emergency or short-term situations impacting their housing status.

The purpose of the program is to promote housing stability among low-income seniors by providing either emergency or short-term rental assistance to prevent displacement and/or assist in obtaining decent, safe, affordable housing. The emergency assistance component of SSNP assists households 55 years or older.

As the SSNP operates with federal funds and is required to comply with federal guidance, the SSNP will operate in accordance with the most recent City Council adopted policies and procedures comparable to the A-LHTF baseline criteria noted above. The SSNP policies and procedures are included in Appendix D.

V.Administration
The following section outlines the governance structure, roles of staff, administrative costs and Guideline adoption/amendment procedures.

1. Governance
Anaheim City Council shall perform all the following functions:

Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 12
• Provide policy direction and oversight
• A-LHTF Guideline adoption, including amendments
• Funding allocation in the Funding Allocation Plan
• Approve program-specific expenditures or project-specific funding commitments • Review Annual Report
The Anaheim Housing and Community Development Commission shall serve as an advisory body on all matters of the A-LHTF and provide a recommendation to the Anaheim City Council.

2. Staff and Administration
The day-to-day operations and administration of the A-LHTF shall be completed by the Housing and Community Development Department and assisted by the Finance Department.
• Housing and Community Development Department- The Director of Housing and Community Development, or designee, shall serve as the administrator of the A- LHTF. The Director’s administrative responsibilities shall include implementation, monitoring, evaluation and reporting on the projects and programs outlined in the Guidelines and Funding Allocation Plans.
• Finance Department - The Finance Director/City Treasurer, or designee, shall provide financial management and accounting services for the LHTF including disbursing and collecting A-LHTF funds; maintaining and managing a separate account or accounts for A-LHTF funds; and, maintaining financial records for the A-LHTF.

The implementation and administration of the various programs will incur administrative costs including legal, project management personnel, third party financial and economic analysis, and environmental and labor compliance management. Funding Allocation Plan budgets shall include a 3.12% allocation to cover administrative costs.

3. Adoption and Amendments to the Guidelines
The adoption of A-LHTF Guidelines, and any amendments, shall be through a Resolution of the City Council. Additionally, the Housing and Community Development Commission shall provide a recommendation to the City Council prior to City Council consideration. Drafts of Guidelines and/or amendments shall be made available for public review in accordance with all standard City Clerk protocols.

VI. Funding
Sources and Financial Management
The City of Anaheim’s Housing and Community Development Department has a longstanding history of managing multiple federal, state and local funding sources to support the existing affordable housing projects and programs. The A-LHTF will serve as an additional local funding source to support new tailored programs or be leveraged with other state and federal funding.

Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 13
The following outlines the potential funding sources that can be accepted into the Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund (A-LHTF), budgeting and allocating procedures, prioritization considerations, audits and transparency measures.

1. Funding Sources
The A-LHTF serves as a vehicle to receive funds from other government, private and philanthropic sources to invest in housing initiatives. The following is a list of potential sources that may be deposited into the A-LHTF:
• Local government funding (City General Funds, etc.)
• Federal and State grants (Federal PRO Housing grant, State Local Housing Trust Fund Program, etc.)
• Private and philanthropic contributions (Development Agreement Community Benefit funds, Foundation philanthropic gifts, etc.)
• In-Lieu Fees (paid to the City of Anaheim as an alternative to providing affordable housing units on-site as required by the Affordable Housing Ordinance) • Funds collected and utilized pursuant to an assessment district and its guidelines by providing a specific benefit to the payors of the assessment Funding sources may have specific funding requirements that require those funds to be spent on a certain investment “bucket” or on a targeted population. Individual fund monitoring and reporting will be required for any funding source specific requirements.

2. Budgeting and Allocation
The available and projected funds in the A-LHTF shall be budgeted in the A-LHTF Funding Allocation Action Plan during the city’s annual budget planning process.

Requests to expend funds on individual programs or programs outlined in the A-LHTF Funding Allocation Plan shall require separate Council actions. Transfer for funds from the A-LHTF may be required to the Anaheim Housing Authority (“Authority”) for purposes of combining with other funding sources prior to acquiring a future development site, gap financing a development, etc. This shall take the form of a Cooperation Agreement between the City and the Authority.

3. Financ
ial Controls and Audits
A-LHTF will be subject to the City’s standard financial controls, including regular audits and financial reporting requirements. All A-LHTF activities will comply with the City’s adopted audit procedures, and any additional financial oversight required by individual funding sources will also be implemented to ensure transparency and accountability.

4. Transparency
All Guidelines, Funding Allocation Plans and Annual Reports shall be posted on the City’s website for public access. Any proposed action to adopt or modify the Guidelines, allocate funds and expend funds will be duly noticed and posted according to standard City protocols for discretionary Council actions.

Anaheim Local Housing Trust Fund – Guidelines
MAY 2025 14
VII. Monitoring and Evaluation
The City of Anaheim will be diligent stewards of the funds deposited into the A-LHTF. Staff will continue and expand existing monitoring and evaluation procedures to ensure compliance with funding source(s), occupancy requirements, loan repayments terms, and other key performance metrics.

The Director of Housing and Community Development, or designee, shall prepare and present an annual report to the City Council regarding the activities undertaken with funds from the A- LHTF in the previous year and any other topics required by the Guidelines.

The A-LHTF seeks to provide long-term community benefits. At a minimum, the following list of key performance metrics shall be evaluated and outlined in the Annual Reports:
• Number of homeowners assisted
• Affordable housing units produced
• Total funding utilized and leveraged
• Underutilized and/or nuisance sites acquired
APPENDIX A – FUNDING ALLOCATION PLAN
The table below outlines the recommended use of the initial $16 million in A-LHTF resources to support key affordable housing priorities.

Program Investment Amount Percentage
Starting Balance $16,000,000* 100.00%
Build More Homes Initiative $5,000,000* 31.25%
First-Time Homebuyer Programs $5,000,000 31.25%
Housing Stability Program $1,000,000 6.25%
Administration $500,000 3.12%
Reserve Account $4,500,000
*Includes $1M from a federal grant that requires use of funds for housing production.

28.13%
APPENDIX B – OVERVIEW OF OPTIONAL PROGRAMS
I. Preserving Affordable Housing Program
Preservation of affordable housing is a crucial issue for the city of Anaheim, where economic disparities and rising housing costs pose significant challenges to the community. To combat these issues, Anaheim is committed to preserving its existing rental housing stock to expand housing opportunities for very low-low- and moderate-income households.

Affordable housing preservation efforts fall into two categories: deed restricted housing and naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH).
• Deed Restricted Affordable Housing - Deed restricted housing includes properties where affordability is legally mandated through covenants, ensuring that rents remain accessible to low- and moderate-income households. These restrictions are typically tied to subsidies or public funding and are enforced for a 55-year term. Anaheim actively monitors these properties and tracks expiring covenants. By tracking the covenants, the City can intervene as necessary to renew or extend agreements to prevent units from transitioning to market rate. This monitoring strategy is part of a broader strategy to maintain the city’s affordable housing inventory and prevent displacement within the community.
• Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing (NOAH) - NOAH refers to rental properties that are affordable without the benefit of government subsidies or deed restrictions. These units tend to have lower rents due to factors like such building age, location, or other factors that influence price rather than formal affordability mechanisms. NOAH is crucial because it often serves as an unofficial segment of the affordable housing market.

The City faces limitations in its authority to prevent them from being sold to market rate developers. This gap in regulatory control poses a challenge. Rents for unrestricted NOAH units are set by individual property owners based on market conditions, making them vulnerable to leaving the affordable housing stock. As these units age, significant capital investments are needed to maintain their quality. However, the relatively low rents that make these units affordable often result in limited cash flow for owners, hindering long-term maintenance efforts. By offering resources to NOAH property owners in exchange for a deed-restricted affordability commitment, the City can preserve these units while incentivizing owners to invest in necessary building improvements.

The following outlines the challenges facing preservation of deed-restrict and naturally occurring affordable housing:
• The City has identified 462 units at risk of losing their affordability covenants in the next 10 years.
• Existing State and Federal financial resources are ill suited for preservation projects that are smaller than 50 units.
• Currently, there are no State or Federal funding sources that are set-aside exclusively for unsubsidized affordable housing preservation. Federal sources that include tax credits, CDBG, HOME, are generally only compatible with larger, rental projects. Larger developments are favored because they can achieve more units per dollar invested, which makes them more competitive in the application process.

Capital Improvement and Rehabilitation Funds
Dedicated financial resources are needed to ensure the continued affordability and physical quality of the assisted housing stock. In the event resources become available, below are some ways to preserve affordable housing stock with financial incentives:
• Establish dedicated funding streams to support capital repairs and improvements in deed- restricted units.
• Offer low- or no-interest loans or grants to owners for necessary rehab, contingent upon extending affordability restrictions.
• Provide financial incentives for property owners who voluntarily extend or renew expiring deed restrictions.
• Use public-private partnerships and layered financing (e.g., tax credits, local housing trust funds) to support timely acquisitions.

II. Nei
ghborhood Improvement & Economic Connectivity Program
Neighborhoods serve as the foundational building blocks of a city’s socioeconomic well-being.

In Anaheim, where overcrowding and access to resources impact livability, many vulnerable communities face challenges related to infrastructure, mobility, safety, and economic connectivity. Past projects like Hermosa Village provided comprehensive improvements, including the renovation of its affordable housing properties, community facilities, and public infrastructure, transforming an aging neighborhood into a thriving community. While these efforts reflect the City’s commitment to serve Anaheim’s most vulnerable neighborhoods, many communities continue to face livability challenges and disconnection from high-opportunity areas.

Leveraging a more systems-thinking approach to neighborhood improvement, this effort will focus on enhancing the existing housing stock and mobility infrastructure to strengthen connections between existing multifamily neighborhoods and high-opportunity areas, such as employment hubs and commercial corridors. Using city-owned code enforcement data, OCTA transportation ridership, and Streetlight on-demand transportation pattern analytics, the Anaheim Livability Lab will identify aging housing and stock mobility-challenged neighborhoods strategically located near commercial corridors, where targeted investments can improve access to jobs, services, and foster economic opportunity.

HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION AND STABILIZATION

PILOT PROGRAM

DOUGLAS BECHT

DIRECTOR OF CARE COORDINATION

CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE STUDY OF PEOPLE EXPERIENCING

HOMELESSNESS
 High housing costs combined with low incomes left
participants vulnerable to homelessness.
 32% entered homelessness from a stable living
situation in which they were on a lease, mortgage, or
other written agreement, although most were on a
lease (rather than a mortgage).
 These individuals described rapid descents precipitated by discrete events, such as a threatened (or actual) eviction, domestic violence, a family health crisis that required immediate full-time caretaking, an incarceration, or
wildfire.
 By the time they became homeless, many had navigated
through a series of less stable and lower quality housing.

These included moving from being a primary leaseholder
to renting a room in a shared house, having multiple
roommates, or renting low-quality housing.

CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE STUDY OF PEOPLE EXPERIENCING

HOMELESSNESS
 Participants believed that financial assistance would help them obtain housing and exit homelessness.
 Eighty-six percent thought that a monthly subsidy of $300-$500 a month would help them re-enter housing.
 Ninety-five percent thought a lump-sum payment of $5,000- $10,000 would help them.
 Ninety-six percent thought that a Housing Choice Voucher (or similar rental subsidy) would help them re-enter housing

PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA:

MANY CA RENTERS REMAIN FINANCIALLY STRESSED
 One million California renters are behind on their rent payments, and almost 150,000 of them believe that it is very or somewhat likely they will face eviction in the next two months, according to recent Census Bureau surveys.
 The majority (60%) of those behind on rent are at least two months in arrears, and one-third are three or more months behind.
 Economically vulnerable renters are most at risk. Those who have experienced recent declines in wages are almost twice as likely than others to be behind in rent, and low-income households (less than $35,000 per year) are five times as likely as high-income households (greater than $100,000 per year) to be behind.  Renters with a high school diploma or less are more than twice as likely (15%) as college graduates (7%) to be behind.
2023 HOMELESS SURVEY
 18.2 % of people surveyed reported becoming homelessness for the first time in the last 12 months. The following is a breakdown of their length of homelessness by months:

HOMELESS SERVICE SYSTEM PILLARS

PREVENTION
 What is Prevention? Prevention is a short-term intervention provided to individuals and families at risk of homelessness or experiencing a housing crisis to achieve housing stability.  What is the goal of Prevention? Keep individuals and families in their homes and avoid an eviction with short- term interventions to stabilize housing
 Principles & Commitments
 Early Intervention
 Increase Community Awareness & Education
 Effective Reentry & Transition Planning
 Measure Outcomes
 Prevention is an Integral Components of the Homeless System of Care

HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION AND STABILIZATION

PILOT PROGRAM
Eligibility Criteria
 Head of household who is age 18 or older
 Orange County Resident
 Household combined income at or below 30% Area
Median Income
 Be at risk of homelessness
Program Components
 Maximum assistance of $10,800 through the term of
the Program
 Direct Financial Assistance – includes rental arrears, past due utility bills, and forward rent and/or utility bills based on financial need. This is a maximum of $6,000.
 Stabilization Payments – recurring financial allocations of $400 each month, for up 12 months to cover
essential living expenses. This is a maximum of $4,800.  Paired with robust case management focuses on
developing financial stability and supportive services
plans to identify community-based programs and
resources that support the household in achieving
housing stability.

Priority Population
 Seniors, age 60 years and older
 Single parent household
 Be at imminent risk of homelessness
1 CITY OF ANAHEIM

SENIOR SAFETY NET PILOT PROGRAM GUIDELINES/OPERATING

PROCEDURES
(June 2023)
I. INTRODUCTION
The Senior Safety Net Program (Program) is a pilot program enacted to assist eligible seniors to address emergency or short -term situations impacting their housing status. The purpose of the program is to promote housing stability among low income seniors by providing either emergency or short-term rental assis tance to prevent displacement and/or assist in obtaining decent, safe, affordable housing. The need for assistance will be evaluated through case management services and based on the qualifications outlined below.

The pilot
program will utilize funds from the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funds, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds and Housing Set -Aside funds. All regulatory requirements applicable to these programs must be adhered to in the administration of this program.

II. Qualifying Guidelines
The guideli
nes below primarily apply to provisions of emergency assistance and the Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA). Assistance in identifying and/or navigating community services, as described under the case management component of the Program is open to all seniors.

1. Senior
is defined as 55 years of age or older for the Case Management and Emergency Assistance components of the program. For HOME Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA), senior is defined as 62 years of age and older.

2. Resi
dency Requirement - to be eligible for any financial assistance, a senior must be a current resident and have resided in the City for a period of no less than six (6) consecutive months.

Applicants must provide documentation verifying their current place of residence.

3. Incom
e requirements – Priority in providing financial assistance will be given to seniors whose income is at or below the Extremely Low Income (ELI) category, which is 30% of the Average Median Income (AMI), as established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for federal programs. In all cases, income may not exceed the Very Low Income, or 50% of the AMI category, for either the Emergency or TBRA components of the Program.

4. The applic
ant and all other adults residing in the household must provide a current picture identification (i.e. government issued ID, including driver’s license, State ID, and student ID if 18 and younger.)

5. The applic
ant and all household members, 18 years of age and older, must provide proof of income dated within the last 30 days (i.e. employment stubs, unemployment, S.S.I., S.S., Cal-Works, documentation of self-employment, child support, etc.) when requesting Emergency or TBRA assistance. If additional documentation is necessary to confirm total household income, the applicant must provide the information requested in a timely manner, generally defined as 10 business days, in order to continue with the eligibility review process. 2 6. The applicant and all household members, 18 years of age and older, must provide documentation of assets dated within the past 30 days. The eligibility process will include a review of assets.

Households with liquid assets exceeding $5,000 and or an overall net worth at or exceeding $100,000 are not eligible for assistance under the Emergency Assistance component of the Senior Safety Net Program. Liquid assets refers primarily to resources such as savings and checking accounts that do not require further action or expense to access. A review of net worth will take into consideration all assets including real property with the exception of mobile homes.

III. Case Management
Case manage
ment services are available to all seniors. There is no income verification associated with this component of the Program. Services under this section include; • Intake
and assessment of client needs, coordination of a service delivery plan, para- professional counseling, and follow-up on success of client/agency linkage, and conduct client progress checks.
• Infor
mation and referral services; identification of on-going support services/needs of seniors, assistance in accessing services; identification of short-term and long-term needs of clients and providing responsible referrals to social service agencies for assistance. • Monit
or and document client progress toward independence; establish and prepare case management files; prepare and maintain long term tracking records of clients; prepare and maintain statistical and narrative reports, productivity records, daily staff logs, project plans, and incident reports.

IV. Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP)
The Eme
rgency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) is a periphery program run by the City of Anaheim offering rental and utility assistance. Assistance through ERAP may be provided to qualifying seniors experiencing housing instability related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Households must provide sufficient documentation demonstrating COVID-19 hardship to qualify for assistance.

Ass
istance is only available to households that show proof of past due rent or utility payments. The total amount of assistance provided is made at the discretion of the program administrator pending available funding and in compliance with ERAP program guidelines.

V. Emergency Assistance
Emer
gency assistance may be provided to eligible seniors experiencing financial hardship which may contribute to housing displacement as a result of an unforeseen event such as a job loss, medical emergency, loss of family member, and/or significant but short-term increase living expenses.

Assistance may also be provided to assist a qualifying senior to obtain permanent, stable housing.

Under l
imited circumstances, emergency assistance may be provided to address a significant rent increase or utility bill (on a case by case basis). When assistance is requested to address these circumstances, applicants must be able to demonstrate that moving forward they will have sufficient income to cover rent and other living expenses needed to remain stably housed.

A rev
iew of asset is required as a condition of providing any emergency assistance. Households with 3 liquid assets that exceed $5000 and/or a net worth at or above $100,000 are not eligible for emergency assistance. Additionally, applicants may be asked to utilize available assets before any emergency assistance is provided.

Emer
gency assistance can be provided to eligible seniors for the following categories:
• Moving c
osts – when the applicant is moving into a unit that provides financial stability or obtaining housing following displacement. Not to exceed $1000. • Rent ar
rears – not to exceed two months’ rent or $3000 whichever is less. • Secur
ity deposit – not to exceed two months’ rent or $3000, whichever is less. Assistance shall only be provided to meet the property owner’s customary security deposit requirement, that is, if only a one month deposit is requested from new tenants, financial assistance shall not exceed that amount.
• Assist
ance with first and last month’s rent – not to exceed $3000 • Assista
nce for other expenses for which there is a demonstrated nexus between the financial assistance requested and housing stability may be considered on a case-by-case basis and will need to be approved by an authorized manager.

Emer
gency assistance may only be granted once in a 5 year period. In some cases, it may be necessary to provide assistance for two or more categories. For example, it may be necessary to provide assistance with moving assistance and a security deposit to stabilize a senior experiencing a financial hardship. In such cases, assistance shall not exceed $4000.

VI. Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA)
Appli
cants who may need more assistance than is available under the Emergency Assistance component of the Program to achieve housing stability may be considered for Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). This component of the Program is funding by federal HOME funds therefore all program requirements governing documentation and income requirements will apply. TBRA assistance may be approved for up to 6 months depending on the needs of the applicant. Under limited circumstances, assistance may be extended on a case by case basis but may not exceed 12 months.

Department Director approval is required for assistance beyond 6 months.

Case m
anagement for TBRA will include up to three one-on-one appointments with the program staff to review and collect eligibility documentation necessary to administer TBRA. Applicants must agree to return documents to program administrators in a timely manner (on average within five business days) and program administrators reserve the right to deny applicants based on non-responsiveness or non- compliance.

A HO
ME TBRA Form will be completed by program staff for every client that receives TBRA assistance.

VII. TENANT SELECTION POLICY
The Tenant Bas
ed Rental Assistance (TBRA) program follows all of the requirements set forth 4 for the HOME Program under Section 24, Part 92, of the Code of Federal Regulations (24 CFR 92).

A. Eligible Participating Tenant Households - For the purposes of participating in the City’s TBRA Program, an eligible Senior Tenant Household must qualify as a low-income household and must meet local preference requirements. Senior is defined as 62 years of age and older.

While t
he definition of a low-income household is a Tenant Household that has an adjusted annual income that does not exceed eighty percent (80%) of the median income, adjusted for family size, established by U.S. Department of HUD for the City of Anaheim , the City may adopt local priorities.

The purposes o
f the Senior Safety Net program, the City shall adopt the following local priorities:

1. Seniors (62 years or older) whose income is at or below 30 % of AMI and that are paying over 50% of their monthly income for rent, first-come, first-served basis.

2. Seniors (62 years or older) whose income is at 30% that are paying over 30% of their monthly income for rent, first-come, first-served basis.

3. Seniors (62 years or older) whose income is at or below 50% or AMI that are paying over 50% of their monthly income for rent, first-come, first-served basis.

4. Seniors (62 years or older) whose income is at or below 50% or AMI that are paying over 30% of their monthly income for rent, first-come, first-served basis.

Applicants shall be selected based on Fair Housing priorities which prohibit discrimination based on age, race, creed, religion, sex, handicap, national origin or familial status.

B. Determination of Participating Tenant Household Income - Gross annual income, includes all payment from all sources, whether in cash or in-kind, that is anticipated to be received by all adult members of the Participating Tenant Household. The Gross Annual Income includes, but is not limited to:

1. Gross amount of wage, salary, overtime pay, commissions, fees, tips and bonuses

2. Net income from the operation of a business or profession

3. Interest and other income of any kind from real or personal property

4. Full amount of periodic payments received from social security, annuities, insurance policies, retirement funds, pensions, disability/handicap or death benefits

5. Payment in lieu of earnings such as unemployment, worker’s compensation and severance pay.

6. Social Security Assistance (SSA) and/or Social Security Disability Supplemental Income Assistance (SSI)

7. Alimony, child support and other regular contributions 5 B. Adjustment of gross monthly income - Monthly income shall equal one-twelfth of gross annual income, reduced by each $400.00 per senior household member.

VIII. ELIGIBLE HOUSING UNITS

A. Eligible Housing Units - Participating Tenant Households receiving Program assistance from the City of Anaheim must reside in an eligible Housing Unit. An eligible Housing Unit must:

1. Be inspected to demonstrate t hat the housing unit meets the f ederally established Housing Quality Standards (HQS) as set forth in 24 CFR 982.401. If necessary, eligible households may apply for assistance (in the form of a loan or grant) through the City’s Residential Rehabilitation Program, if repairs are necessary to pass an HQS inspection.

2. Receive no other rent subsidies from Federal, State or other local sources.

Occupancy Standard - The eligible Housing Unit shall contain at least one bedroom or living/sleeping room of appropriate size. The following occupancy standard shall apply:

Unit Type Number in Household
One-Bedroom Unit 1 to 3 Persons
Two-Bedroom Unit 3 to 5 Persons
Three-Bedroom Unit 5 to 7 Persons

IX. ADVERTISING TO ELIGIBLE SENIOR HOUSEHOLDS RESIDING IN HOUSING UNITS LOCATED

WITHIN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

The City shall advertise the Program by distributing flyers and/or offering workshops to senior residents.

LANDLORD REQUIREMENTS

• The lease agreement will include a lease addendum that will be executed in connection with the lease between the landlord and the eligible household.

• The addendum will include the terms of the rental assistance payments to be paid to the landlord on behalf of the eligible household, confirm the obligations of the landlord, confirm obligations of the eligible household regarding payment of rent, utilities and appliances, rules and regulations of tenancy and confirm the landlord's obligation to maintain the housing unit in accordance with HQS. • The property owner will be required to provide the City or its Consultant with notice of a lease termination, prohibit discrimination by the landlord against the eligible household as well as lease provisions prohibited by the HOME Program.
6 • The City or its Consultant will review the rental agreement to confirm its compliance with state law and all HOME Program requirements.
• Each landlord will be required to submit a completed IRS Form W -9 Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification. The City or its Consultant will rely on this information when issuing a 1099 form to each payee as required by the IRS. A 1099 form must be issued annually to all participating landlord (payee).

MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF RENTAL SUBSIDY/TENANT HOUSEHOLD CONTRIBUTION A. Payment Standard - The City shall utilize the Payment Standard established by the Anaheim Housing Authority (AHA) for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program, which is published by AHA on a yearly basis. (See Attached Rent Subsidy Chart).

B. Total Tenant Household Payment - Participating Tenant Households shall pay 50% of their adjusted monthly income (as hereafter defined) for housing costs consisting of monthly rent payment. If the r ent is above the Payment Standard the household will pay 50% of its income toward housing plus the amount by which the rent exceeds the payment standard C. Rent Reasonableness Review - City shall review the Participating Tenant Household’s lease agreement to verify the amount of rent paid on a monthly basis, excluding utilities.

X. LENGTH OF ASSISTANCE
The City will
provide rental assistance payments for up to six months from the date of the execution of Rent Payment Contract with the possibility of an extension, not to exceed twelve months.

Rental Assistance Payments will be made by the City on a monthly basis directly to the Property Manager. Assistance may be terminated upon verification that the Participating Tenant Household:

A. Is no longer income eligible (i.e. income exceeds fifty percent of area median income adjusted per family size), or
f
B. No longer resides in the eligible Housing Unit on a full-time basis.

In additi
on, rental assistance could be terminated if the City no longer receives HOME funding. If HOME funding to the City is discontinued the TBRA program funding will be terminated on June 30th of the current program year.

XI. RIGHT TO AN INFORMAL HEARING PROCEDURE
Participating Tenant Households have the right to be heard by an impartial official, without prejudice.

Program participants may appeal a proposed Program action that may have an adverse effect upon them by submitting a written Request for Hearing to the City of Anaheim, which includes the Participating Tenant Household's objection, name and relationship of all potential parties, list of documents to be presented, current address and telephone number. Appeals must be filed within seven (7) calendar days 7 of notification of proposed Program action.

The informal hearing will be scheduled as soon as possible. The informal hearing shall be conducted in English. Notice of Informal Hearing will be issued at least ten days prior to the Hearing appointment. The Participating Tenant Household may bring legal counsel and/or a translator at their expense.

Participating Tenant Household may bring person(s) to testify and/or documents at their expense.

Participating Tenant Households may review pertinent file documentation as along as such documentation does not infringe on any other party's rights.

Within ten business days of the Informal Hearing, the official's decision will be mailed.

XII. PROGRAM PROCEDURES

1. The City or its Consultant receives the application.

2. City staff reviews application and tenant lease agreement. The lease must be signed by the tenant and landlord which outlines the prohibited lease terms and other basic leasing requirements.

3. Annual gross income is verified and adjusted monthly income is calculated to determine the Total Tenant Payment.

4. Application approved by City staff.

5. Unit inspection.

6. Preparation and execution of the Rental Assistance Contract between the City and the Participating Tenant Household.

7. City sets up project on HUD IDIS.

8. City will make monthly payments to the Property Manager on a reoccurring basis based on the discretion of the Community and Economic Development Manager . City shall drawdown Federal funds to reimburse City for such costs.

DEFI

NITIONS
Fair Market Rent (FMR)
The Fair Market Rent (FMR) is a rent standard that is established and published by the U.S. Department of HUD for individual jurisdictions based upon the rent for standard units within that jurisdiction.

Housing Unit Characteristics
The Housing Unit Characteristics are certain minimum housing quality standards that meet local building codes as well as established Federal Section 8 Program minimum housing quality standards.

Initial Income Verification
8 Initial Income Verification determines if program applicants are income-eligible by reviewing original source documents.

Income eligibility
Income eligibility is based on anticipated GROSS ANNUAL income from all sources as follows:

1. The full amount, before any payroll deductions, of wages and salaries, overtime pay, commissions, fees, tips and bonuses, and other compensation for personal services;

2. The net income from operation of a business or profession. Expenditures for business expansion or amortization of capital indebtedness shall not be used as deductions in determining net income. An allowance for depreciation or assets used in a business or profession may be deducted, based on straight line depreciation, as provided in Internal Revenue Service regulations. Any withdrawal of cash or assets from the operation of a business or profession will be included in income, except to the extent the withdrawal is reimbursement of cash or assets invested in the operation by the Family;

3. Interest, dividends, and other net income of any kind from real or personal property. Expenditures for amortization of capital indebtedness shall not be used as a deduction in determining net income. An allowance for depreciation is permitted only as authorized in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. Any withdrawal of cash or assets from an investment will be included in income, except to the extent the withdrawal is reimbursement of cash or assets invested by the Family. Where the Household has Net Household Assets in excess of $5,000, annual Income shall include the greater of the actual income derived from all Net Household Assets or a percentage of the value of such Assets based on the current passbook savings rate, as determined by HUD;

4. The full amount of periodic payments received from social security, annuities, insurance policies, retirement funds, pensions, disability or death benefits and other similar types of periodic receipts, including a lump-sum payment for the delayed start of a periodic payment;

5. Payments in lieu of earnings, such as unemployment and disability compensation, worker's compensation and severance pay (but see paragraph (c)(3) of this section);

6. Welfare Assistance. If the Welfare Assistance payment includes an amount specifically designed for shelter and utilities that is subject to adjustment by the Welfare Assistance agency in accordance with the actual cost of shelter and utilities, the amount of Welfare Assistance income to be included as income shall consist of:
(i) The amount of the allowance or grant exclusive of the amount specifically designated or shelter or utilities, plus
(ii) The maximum amount that the Welfare Assistance agency could in fact allow the Household for shelter and utilities. If the Household's Welfare Assistance is ratably reduced from the standard of need by applying a percentage, the amount calculated under this paragraph (b)(6)(ii) shall be the amount resulting from one application of the percentage;

7. Periodic and determinable allowances, such as alimony and child support payments, and regular contributions or gifts received from persons not residing in the dwelling;

8. All regular pay, special pay and allowances of a member of the Armed Forces (but see paragraph (c)(7) of this section); and
9 9. Any earned income tax credit to the extent it exceeds income tax liability.

GROSS ANNUAL income does not include the following:

1. Income from employment of children (including foster children) under the age of 18 years;

2. Payments received for the care of foster children;

3. Lump-sum additions to Household assets, such as inheritances, insurance payments (including payments under health and accident insurance and worker's compensation), capital gains and settlement for personal or property losses (but see paragraph (b)(5) of this section);

4. Amounts received by the Household that are specifically for, or in reimbursement of, the cost of medical expenses for any family member;

5. Income of a live-in aide, as defined in 24 CFR 813.102;

6. Amounts of educational scholarships paid directly to the student or to the educational institution, and amounts paid by the Government to a veteran, for use in meeting the costs of tuition, fees, books, equipment, materials, supplies, transportation, and miscellaneous personal expenses of the student.

Any amount of such scholarship or payment to a veteran not used for the above purposes that is available for subsistence is to be included in income;

7. The special pay to a Household member serving in the Armed Forces who is exposed to hostile fire;

8. (i) Amounts received under training programs funded by HUD (ii) Amounts received by a Disabled person that are disregarded for a limited time for purposes of Supplemental Security Income eligibility and benefits because they are set aside for used under a Plan to Attain Self-Sufficiency (PASS); or
(iii) Amounts received by a participant in other publicly assisted programs which are specifically for or in reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred (special equipment, clothing, transportation, child-care, etc.) and which are made solely to allow participation in a specific program;

9. Temporary, nonrecurring or sporadic income (including gifts);

10. For all initial determinations and reexaminations of income carried out on or after April 23, 1993, reparation payments paid by a foreign government pursuant to claims filed under the laws of that government by persons who were persecuted during the Nazi era; or

11. Amounts specifically excluded by any other Federal stature from consideration as income for purposes of determining eligibility or benefits under a category or assistance programs that includes assistance under the United States Housing Act of 1937.

Lease
The lease must be a written document and have a term of at least one year.

Maximum TBRA Payment
10 The maximum TBRA payment is the difference between 50% of the Participating Tenant Household’s adjusted monthly income and the rent limit (payment standard) established by the City.

Program Participant Selection
Participant selection occurs upon the receipt of a complete application package from a tenant household that is processed on a first-come, first-serve basis.

Payment Standard
The P
rogram shall utilize the Payment Standard established by the Anaheim Housing Authority (AHA) for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program, which is published by AHA on a yearly basis. (See Attached Rent Subsidy Chart). If space rent is above the FMR household will pay 50 percent of its income toward housing plus the amount by which the unit’s space rent exceeds the payment standard.

Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA)
Tenant based rental assistance is a rental subsidy program provided by the City to help individual households afford housing costs.

Total Tenant Payment
The total tenant payment is the share of the amount of monthly rent to be paid by the Participating Tenant Household.
11 CURRENT INCOME GUIDELINES
Based on HUD Guidelines published June 21, 2023
FAMILY
SIZE

VERY LOW
(30% OF MEDIAN)
LOW
(50% OF MEDIAN)
1 $30,150 $50,250
2 $34,450 $57,400
3 $38,750 $64,600
4 $43,050 $71,750
5 $46,500 $77,500
6 $49,950 $83,250
7 $53,400 $89,000
8 $56,850 $94,750
12 FAIR MARKET RENTS
FY 2023
Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA HUD Metro FMR Area
FMRs for All Bedroom Sizes
2023 FMRs Per Unit Based on Number of Bedrooms
One-Bedroom Two-Bedroom Three-Bedroom Four-Bedroom
$2,113 $2,539 $3,448 $4,032
Fair Market Rents (FMRs) are published by HUD to be used by the Orange County Housing Authority (OCHA) for administration of the Housing Choice Voucher Program effective October 1, 2018. 201 S. Anaheim Blvd.

Tenth Floor
Anaheim, CA
92805
Tel: (714) 765-4300
Fax: (714) 765-4630
www.anaheim.net

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
City of Anaheim

HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT
DATE: APRIL 18, 2023
FROM: HOUSING & COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT:

APPROVE A COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR THE NORTH

HARBOR ANAHEIM PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING

PROJECT PREVIOUSLY
KNOWN AS THE STUDIO 6 MOTEL

INTERIM HOUSING PROJECT
ATTACHMENT (Y/N): YES ITEM # 22
GOVERNMENT CODE §
84308 APPLIES: YES
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council, by Motion, approve a Cooperation Agreement, substantially in the form attached hereto,
by and between the City of Anaheim and the Anaheim Housing Authority, for the North Harbor Anaheim Permanent Supportive Housing Project formerly known as Studio 6 Motel, located at 1251 North Harbor Boulevard for the rehabilitation and conversion of the existing interim housing project; authorize the Director of Housing & Community Development to execute and administer the agreement; and authorize de minimis changes that do not substantially change the terms and conditions of the Cooperation Agreement, as determined by the City Attorney.

BACKGROUND:

In December 2021, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (State HCD) released a Notice of Funding Availability
for the Homekey Program. On
January 25, 2022, the Anaheim (City) City Council and the Anaheim Housing Authority (Authority) approved the submission of an application for Homekey Program Round 2 funds in partnership with Linc Housing Corporation (Developer) and the project’s supportive services provider, American Family Housing USA, a California non-profit corporation for the acquisition and rehabilitation of the 119-room Studio 6 Motel built on 1.47 acres located at 1251 N. Harbor Boulevard. The Homekey Program provides funding to support the acquisition and occupancy of hotels, motels, and other existing structures to support the expedient delivery of affordable housing for persons experiencing homelessness.

On March 28, 2022, the City and the Developer were awarded $26,537,559 to acquire and operate the Studio
6 Motel as interim housing (Phase I). This initial phase involved the rehabilitation of 89 units for the purposes of interim housing as required by Homekey funding guidelines. The 89 units were in fair condition and ready for occupancy after minor repairs except for units that required renovation to meet the Homekey accessibility and hearing/visual requirements. Additional improvements ATTACHMENT 4K
(APPENDIX 3)
Preliminary Funding Award Letter and Cooperation Agreement for Linc Housing Corporation April 18, 2023

Page 2 of 3 ends

Anaheim City CouncilJune 9, 2026

Anaheim City Council
June 9, 2026