Agenda packet — Baldwin Park City Council, March 16, 2022 (part 3 of 4)

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2021, 02:06:20 PM
Project Name: 13266 Ramona Bl in Baldwin Park
Project Description: 11-unit Residential Condominium Project Project Location
Jurisdiction:

Baldwin Park
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)

APN TAZ
8552-004-017 22270300
8552-004-018 22270300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2012
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 11
Total DUs: 11
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

E%tremely Low Income: 0 W
Very Low Income: 0 W
Low Income: 0 W
Parking:

Motor Vehicle Parking:

Bicycle Parking:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 2 ends

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: SGVCOG Average
VMT Baseline Value 1: 3690/
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15W
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local Jurisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
3091 3091 3091
Low VMT Screening Analysis Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass)

Attachment #3
Exhibit “A”, Architectural Plans with Tentative Tract Map

Attachment #4
Vicinity Map

Vicinity Map

LOCATION: 13266 Ramona Boulevard

CASE NUMBER: PR 20-33 / TM 83328

DATE: May 26, 2021

AREA
MAP
Not to Scale
N

Subject
Property

STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. ________11_________
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sam Gutierrez, Director of Public Works
DATE: March 16, 2022
SUBJECT: Accept Construction Improvements, Approve Cooperative Agreement with the City of Irwindale, and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion for City Project, CIP 20-37 Major and Residential Streets Rehabilitation Project

SUMMARY
This report seeks Council consideration for the acceptance of various Major and Residential Streets Improvements throughout the City. This item will close the construction contract and authorize the filling of a Notice of Completion (NOC) with the LA County Recorder’s Office. This request also includes the approval of a Cooperative Agreement with the City of Irwindale for improvements completed within their boundary and for the benefit of the commuting public. The work includes asphalt concrete pavement cold-mill and overlay, installation of highly visible crosswalks with Rapid Repeater Flashing Beacons (RRFB), new ADA compliant access ramp upgrades, concrete repairs to sidewalks, curb and gutter, driveway access aprons, traffic pavement marking and striping and installation of speed cushions at various locations. The project also includes the construction of new sidewalk, curb and gutter and a cross-gutter along Garvey Avenue between Puente Avenue and Garden View Lane.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Accept the construction improvements by Onyx Paving Company, Inc. and authorize the recordation of a Notice of Completion for City Project No. CIP 20-37; and

2. Approve and authorize CEO to execute Cooperative Agreement with the City of Irwindale for an amount of $41,424.70; and

3. Authorize the Director of Finance to deposit $41,424.70 into the project funding and to make the necessary budget adjustments to create a new project account for the expenditures related to the project; and

4. Authorize an appropriation in the amount not-to-exceed $10,776.50 from Fund #256 to Account #256-50-520-58100-15082 for additional work-related project Inspection and construction; and

5. Authorize the release of retention funds in the amount of $81,700 to Onyx Paving Company, Inc. upon the expiration of 35-day notice period.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund. The total FY2021-22 approved CIP budget for the project is $1,704,458.00 detailed in the following table:

The total unspent funds are $30,648.20 from the revenue of the City of Irwindale contribution and approved budget.

BACKGROUND
On August 17, 2021, a total of six (6) bids were received and checked for errors, and all were determined to be valid. The lowest responsive and responsible bid was from Onyx Paving Company, Inc. of Anaheim with a bid of $1,484,000.

On September 1, 2021, City Council approved plans and specifications for the project, authorize the award of a construction contract with Onyx Paving Company, Inc., in an amount of $1,484,000, and approve a request for service (RFS) proposal with Infrastructure Engineers (IE) for the construction management/ inspection services in the amount of $59,850.

The selection of streets was done through the City’s Pavement Management System (PMS) utilized to identify and rate the condition of City streets to facilitate the development of pavement rehabilitation projects and programs. With the aid of the PMS, Staff analyses the conditions of the streets and develops street improvement programs with various funding scenarios which are programed in the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The PMS ranks streets based on a Pavement Condition Index (PCI rating) ranging from zero to 100 with zero being the poorest condition. The streets selected for this project were identified by the PMS for rehabilitation.

DISCUSSION
The proposed project consists of seven (7) street segments encompassing major and residential streets including Baldwin Park Boulevard, Ramona Boulevard, Merced Avenue, Garvey Avenue, Dalewood Street, Walnut Street and Fairgrove Avenue. The work includes asphalt concrete pavement cold-mill and overlay, installation of highly visible crosswalks with flashing beacons, new ADA compliant access ramp upgrades, concrete repairs to sidewalks, curb and gutter, driveway access aprons, Rapid Repeater Flashing Beacons (RRFB), traffic pavement messages and striping and installation of speed cushions at various locations. The project also includes the construction of new sidewalk, curb and gutter and a cross gutter along Garvey Avenue between Puente Avenue and Garden View Lane.

Approved Funds Amount
CIP20-37
Prop C – Acct. #245-50-520-58100-15082 including a budget transfer of $49,458 from Acct #245-50-520-58100-15625 $249,458.00 LLMD –Acct. #251-50-520-58100-15082 $100,000.00
Measure M –Acct # 254-50-520-58100-15082 $80,000.00
SB1 –Acct # 256-50-520-58100-15082 $1,275,000.00
Appropriate City of Irwindale contribution for improvements from Account # 256-50-520-58100-15082 $10,776.50
Total Funding $1,715,234.50
Construction Costs Amount
Construction Contract $1,484,000.00
Construction Change Orders including quantity adjustments $154,384.50 Contact Administration and Inspection Services (including additional work) $76,850.00 Total Construction Costs $1,715,234.50
The total construction cost of the project is $1,715,234.50 which includes several changes addressing unforeseen and additional work items to complete the project. Change orders were executed for the installation of additional speed cushions, traffic signal loops, additional drainage features to address a flood condition on Garvey Avenue as shown in attachment 2.

To complete the project close-out, Staff recommends that the City Council accept the improvements and authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office.

Additionally, approve a cooperative agreement between the City of Irwindale and the City of Baldwin Park for work on Ramona Boulevard at the San Gabriel River Bridge abutment and paving on Ramona Boulevard from El Monte City Limits to Syracuse Avenue.

LEGAL REVIEW
None Required.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Notice of Completion

2. City of Irwindale Cooperative Agreement

3. Change Order Summary

RECORDING REQUESTED
BY:

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
When Recorded Return To:

Name: CITY OF BALDWIN
PARK
Address: 14403 East Pacific
Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA
91706

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
APN: N/A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:

1. A certain work of improvement on the property hereinafter described and known as:

City Project No. CIP 20-37, Major and Residential Streets Rehabilitation Project for the City of Baldwin Park
and was ACCEPTED by the City Council on: March 16, 2022

2. The FULL NAME of the OWNER is City of Baldwin Park

3. The FULL ADDRESS of the OWNER is 14403 E. Pacific Avenue, Baldwin Park, CA 91706

4. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was COMPLETED on March 11, 2022

5. The work of improvement completed is described as follows: Various Streets Improvements in the form of new Sidewalk, curb and gutter, bulb-outs, sidewalks, ADA Ramps, driveways, traffic signal loops, new AC pavement, restriping, Rapid Repeating Flashing Beacons (RRFB), handrails, drainage improvements and Speed Cushions improvements.

6. THE NAME OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR, if any, for such work of improvement is Onyx Paving Company, Inc.

7. The street address or location of said property is Ramona Blvd. from El Monte City limits to Syracuse Ave., Merced Ave. from Ramona Blvd. to Baldwin Park Blvd., Baldwin Park Blvd. from Kenmore Ave. to Breese Ave., Walnut Ave. from Los Angles St. to Palm Ave., Fairgrove Ave. from Syracuse Ave. to Frazier St., Garvey Ave. from Puente Ave. to Dalewood St., and Dalewood St. from Garvey Ave. to Merced Ave.

The undersigned, being duly sworn, is the Public Works for the City of Baldwin Park, makes this verification on behalf of said entity, has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof, and that the facts stated herein are true.

By:

David Lopez, Associate
Engineer
By:

John Beshay, PE
Engineering Manager
Date: _______ _______
Place of Execution: City of Baldwin Park, City Hall___________ I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date Signature: Sam Gutierrez, Director of
Public Works
City of Baldwin Park, City Hall
Place of Execution

City of Baldwin Park
Project Change Order Summary
City Project No. CIP 20-37, Major and Residential Streets Rehabilitation Project
No. Change Order Description Cost
1 Repair to adjacent to bridge abutment $ 38,990
2 Addition cost for revised slough wall on Dalewood St. $ 14,500 3 R&R Driveway and sidewalk at 3743 Kenmore Ave. $ 7,160 4 Grade and remove excess soil from behind v-gutter $ 7,636 5 Remove 5 LF of slough wall $ 2,938
6 Grade and pave Green Waste yard on Center St. $ 22,067 7 Shotcrete on Dalewood St. east of Puente Ave. $ 11,870 8 Handrail changes on Dalewood St. $ 1,900
9 T-cut trench on Big Dalton Ave./ Garvey Ave.

Pavement markings change for speed humps $41,023.50
10 Addition cost for revised slough wall on Dalewood St. $ 1,250 11 Eliminate handrail powder coating $
(1,950.00)
12 Extend Loops on Merced Ave. N. of Baldwin Park Blvd. $ 7,000 Total $154,384.5
0 STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. ________12_________
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Enrique C. Zaldivar, Chief Executive Officer
Ron Garcia, Acting Director of Community Development
PREPARED BY: Carol Averell, Housing Manager
DATE: March 16, 2022
SUBJECT: Amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Baldwin Park, and Lorraine Mendez
and Associates, Inc.

SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to request that the City Council consider approving an amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Baldwin Park and Lorraine Mendez and Associates, Inc. to complete various planning and reporting requirements per the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations and meet the agency’s deadlines to guarantee the City receives CDBG and HOME funds for fiscal year 2022/23 and continue addressing the needs of the community as we emerge from this pandemic.

This item was continued from the February 2nd City Council meeting.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve an amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement approved as to form by the City Attorney between the City of Baldwin Park and Lorraine Mendez and Associates, Inc., to complete the following items:
a. FY 2019/20 Annual Plan Cares Act Substantial Amendment b. HOME ARP Allocation Plan
c. FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan
d. Other HUD Programs Administration tasks including, but not limited to, assistance with HUD Monitoring response, excluding the financial sections which previously responded, 2021/22 CAPER; and

2. Direct the Chief Executive Officer and the City Attorney to prepare and execute the amendment with Lorraine Mendez and Associates, Inc.; and

3. Authorize the Director of Finance to appropriate the funds and budget amendment accordingly.

FISCAL IMPACT
The funds for this agreement not to exceed $50,000, are proposed to be funded as follows:

1. CDBG Coronavirus Admin Funds (CDBG-CV) up to $25,000 (account #220-40-470-51101- 17050); and

2. CDBG Admin Funds (FY 2021-22) of $3,905 (account #220-470-51101-14700); and

3. HOME ARP Admin Funds up to $21,095 (account #221-40-470-51101-17057).

BACKGROUND
Pursuant to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), all state and local governments receiving Federal funds are required to prepare a five-year strategy designed to address the needs of extremely low, low and moderate-income households within the community as well as the completion of an Annual Action Plan to be submitted 45 days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year.

If any substantial changes must be made during the Program Years a Substantial Amendment must be prepared and submitted to HUD. These plans serve as an application for grant funding for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership Act (HOME) funds received by the City. At the end of each fiscal year the city is also required to submit a Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) to report outputs and outcomes that provides an assessment of the City’s performance.

In addition, due to COVID-19, the City received CDBG Coronavirus (CDBG-CV) funds to address the health and economic challenges brought on by the coronavirus pandemic; and HOME American Rescue Plan (HOME-ARP) funds to assist with production or preservation of affordable housing, tenant based rental assistance, supportive services, homeless prevention services and housing counseling; and the purchase and development of non-congregate shelter units. In order to utilize these funds, a comprehensive plan must be submitted to HUD.

DISCUSSION
The Housing Division manages all HUD funding allocated to the City of Baldwin Park, including CDBG, HOME, and manages the Baldwin Park Housing Authority, which is a separate entity from the City. The Housing Division has seven (7) staff members; five (5) staff mainly work with the Housing Authority Section 8 and Public Housing programs, and two (2) staff work with the CDBG and HOME Programs.

Currently one staff member is out on medical leave.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City of Baldwin Park received CDBG Coronavirus (CDBG-CV) funding to be used to prevent, prepared for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, and on April 8, 2021, HUD announced the new HOME ARP allocations. In addition, the Housing Authority launched its new Project Based Voucher Program and received funding for the new Emergency Housing Voucher Program (EHV). Both HOME ARP and EHV programs are new programs that must primarily benefit individuals and families that are homeless, at risk of homelessness, fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, or human trafficking. In addition, the Housing Authority received funding for the new Emergency Housing Voucher Program that also must be used. Moreover, the Housing Division was also tasked with managing the Rent Stabilization Ordinance (RSO), and the COVID-19 hotline. Since January 2020, the Housing Division has taken on five (5) new programs that have been managed with existing housing staff.

The additional consultant services to the Housing Division would allow staff to maintain the continuity of anticipated level of supportive service to the community. Due to the management of additional programs and grants, a consultant services amendment is needed to assist Housing Division staff to complete reports including the FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan, FY 2019/20 Annual Plan Cares Act Substantial Amendment, HOME ARP allocation plan and a portion of the CDBG Monitoring response regarding the Code Enforcement comprehensive plan to further address the decline of the CDBG targeted code enforcement areas.

In August 2021, city staff requested quotes from three consultants to provide professional services for the preparation of the CAPER report. The quotes were requested from MDG Associates, Inc., Jack Wang, and Lorraine Mendez and Associates, Inc. Based on the response, consultants that specialized in HUD programs are scarce and extremely busy due to COVID, Cares Act funds and HOME ARP.

One of the three consultants was able to assist the city.

On August 6, 2021, the City entered into an agreement with Lorraine Mendez and Associates, Inc., under the Director of Community Services’ spending authority for the preparation of the City’s 2020/21 CAPER with the option that if additional services are needed by the City, an amendment to the agreement will be required to add such services.

It has been determined that the services needed will exceed the spending limit for consulting services under the Chief Executive Officer’s authority. Therefore, staff recommends amending the current agreement with Lorraine Mendez and Associates, Inc., not to exceed $50,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved to form of the report.

ALTERNATIVE

1. City Council may choose not to approve this report; however, due to the need to meet constricted deadlines to receive funding, staff strongly recommends approval; and/or

2. City Council may direct staff with a desired alternative.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Lorraine Mendez and Associates, Inc. Proposal

2. Lorraine Mendez and Associates, Inc. Agreement

3. Lorraine Mendez and Associates, Inc. Amendment No.1

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK

PROPOSAL
FOR

PREPARATION OF THE
2019/20 AAP (CARES ACT)
SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT ; THE
HOME -ARP ALLOCATION PLAN;
THE 2022/23 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN;

AND OTHER HUD PROGRAM

ADMINISTRATION

Prepared for:

City of Baldwin Park
Community Development Department

January 19, 2022

Prepared by:

Lorraine Mendez & Associates, Inc.
2205 Spyglass Trail W.

Oxnard, CA 93036

⬧ 2205 Spyglass Trail W. , Oxnard CA 93036 ⬧ T: (805) 665 -7310 ⬧ ⬧ E: Lorraine [email protected] ⬧
January 19, 2022

City of Baldwin Park
Community Development Department
ATTN: Ben Martinez, Community Development Director
14403 E. Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706
DELIVERED VIA EMAIL: [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK’S 2019/20 AAP (CARES ACT) SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT; HOME -ARP ALLOCATION PLAN ; THE 2022/23 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN ; AND OTHER

HUD PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AS NEEDED

Dear Mr. Martinez,

Thank you for the opportunity to provide services related to the preparation of above-mentioned subject documents. I am pleased to offer my services based upon extensive experience in providing professional grants administration services, including those re lated to the Community Development Block Grant and Home Investment Partnerships Act . I provide professional and technical services to various cities in Orange and Los Angeles Counties . I assist them with the development and implementation of program activities to ensure they are within HUD compliance.

My consultant services also include the preparation and analysis of reports such as the Annual Action Plan, Consolidated Plan, and Comprehensive Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). I ensure that all projects and activities are reported timely and accurately in the Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS).

As principal of Lorraine Mendez & Associates (LM&A), I will maintain responsibility for project management, serve as the primary staff member responsible for preparation of all documents, and coordination with City staff. LM&A is committed to completing all assignments with detail and accuracy and ensuring all projects are on schedule.

All correspondence regarding this proposal can be addressed to:

Lorraine Mendez, Principal
Lorraine Mendez & Associates
2205 Spyglass Trail W.

Oxnard, CA 93036
(805) 665-7310
[email protected]

⬧ 2205 Spyglass Trail W. , Oxnard CA 93036 ⬧ T: (805) 665 -7310 ⬧ ⬧ E: Lorraine [email protected] ⬧

The price indicated in Section 6 – Cost Proposal is valid for 90 days from the date of this letter.

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to the opportunity to work for the City of Baldwin Park.

Sincerely,

LORRAINE MENDEZ & ASSOCIATES

City of Baldwin Park| Proposal for Substantial Amendments and 2022 AAP 1 SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION

Lorraine Mendez & Associates, LLC (LMA) has been in operation for over a decade, however Ms.

Mendez has over 20 years of experience working in or alongside municipalities in the administration of HUD programs. Ms. Mendez has been under contract with other jurisdictions over the last 15 years assisting with similar services as is being proposed in Baldwin Park. Ms.

Mendez is currently contracted with the cities of Westminster, Huntington Beach, Anaheim, and Henderson, NV and has contracted with the cities of Huntington Park , Garden Grove, Baldwin Park, El Monte, and Burbank in the past, as well.

It is understood that the City of Baldwin Park is seeking a qualified firm/person(s) to assist staff, on an as-needed basis, with the preparation of the following documents:

1. Substantial Amendment to 2019/20 Annual Action Plan (CARES Act Amendment)

2. 2021/22 HOME-ARP Allocation Plan

3. FY 2022/23 Annual Action Plan

4. Other HUD Program Administration tasks including, but not limited to, assistance with HUD Monitoring response, 2021/22 CAPER, etc.

It is also understood that Baldwin Park currently has staff assigned full-time to the management and administration of these programs; nonetheless, they desire to contract with a competent consultant or firm to prepare the documents for them. LMA has experience in the development of the Annual Action Plan , 5-Year Consolidated Plan, CAPER, and AAP Amendments , IDIS, file management, HUD program policies and procedures, subrecipient monitoring, and other tasks related to the management and implementation of HUD grants, which are available to be provided on an as-needed basis.

City of Baldwin Park| Proposal for Substantial Amendments and 2022 AAP 2 SECTION 2 – PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Lorraine Mendez of Lorraine Mendez & Associates brings over 20 years of professional experience working with local governments – first as an employee in a Community Development Department where she gained knowledge and experience in the fields of Redevelopment, housing, community development, fiscal management, goal setting, and performance trackin g, and as of 2006, as a consultant dealing exclusively with CDBG and HOME entitlement programs.

Lorraine Mendez has been under contract with local jurisdictions over the last 15 years, including the cities of Westminster, Huntington Beach, Anaheim, Garden Grove, Huntington Park, Burbank, Baldwin Park, El Monte, and Henderson, Nevada providing administrative services associated with the HUD Program, more fully described in Section 3 – Qualifications and Resumes. Ms.

Mendez has a B.A. in Economics with a minor in Business Administration from California State University, Northridge.

In Westminster specifically, Ms. Mendez manages the entire CDBG program, and only relies on staff to receive direction, gather needed data, and attend Council meetings. For Westminster’s HOME program, Ms. Mendez prepares environmental review records, subsidy layering review analyses, and affordable housing agreements as needed. Also, a major focus in Westminster has been to improve the overall administration and implementation of the City’s HUD programs as required by HOME and CDBG reg ulations. Ms. Mendez has been successful at addressing program deficiencies and has established improved administrative protocols for activities under the CDBG and HOME programs.

For the Cities of Huntington Beach, Anaheim, and Henderson, Ms. Mendez provides a variety of services on an as -needed basis. Main services provided include the setting up, funding, and maintenance of HUD activities in IDIS; the development and maintenance of Annual Action Plans, Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPER’s), and AAP Amendments (both minor and substantial); analyses of HUD funding availability and timeliness commitment and expenditure of funds; Environmental Review Records; assistance with draws; research and analysis of proposed projects; a ctivity eligibility reviews; development of standardized quarterly reporting for CDBG subgrantees; area benefit analyses; and other tasks as requested.

City of Baldwin Park| Proposal for Substantial Amendments and 2022 AAP 3 SECTION 3 – QUALIFICATIONS & RESUMES

Lorraine Mendez & Associate s is qualified to assist with the development of the City’s AAP Substantial Amendments, the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, the FY 2022/23 Annual Action Plan , and other CDBG and HOME related tasks, as needed. As project principal, Lorraine Mendez will maintain responsibility for ensuring the overall quality of work of her firm and any subcontracted staff (if needed) for this project, and the timeliness of project deliverables.

Over the past 15 years working exclusively as a consultant for cities such as Westminster, Huntington B each, Anaheim, Garden Grove, El Monte, Huntington Park, Burbank, and Henderson, Nv., Ms. Mendez has provided an array of HUD-related services and work products as outlined below and in the resume that follows:

1. CDBG/HOME Programs Administration
a. Develop and Maintain Project Filing System and Checklist, including all necessary eligibility documentation to ensure compliance with HUD and federal cross -cutting requirements.
b. Conduct environmental reviews and prepare environmental review records for all activities in accordance with NEPA and the implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 58. c. Manage the federal Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS) required to set-up, revise, fund, and report upon accomplishments and beneficiaries for all CDBG and HOME activities.
d. Generate, format, download, and analyze IDIS Reports. e. Prepare agreements for subrecipients (both outside and intradepartmental). f. Assist in department budget preparation and work program. g. Jointly with the Finance Department, assume financial management responsibilities, including preparing draw requests, receipting and drawdown of program income, approving subrecipient payment requests, and monitoring CDBG/HOME expenditures. h. Provide contract administration of CDBG and HOME programs and projects. i. Develop quarterly subrecipient performance reports for quarterly submission. j. Ensure subrecipients submit quarterly reports and conduct desktop monitoring on a quarterly basis.

2. HOME Acquisition/Rehabilitation Program
a. Develop subsidy layering guidelines for rental and owner housing. b. Conduct financial analysis/layering review for Federally assisted residential acquisition and rehabilitation projects.
c. Assist City staff in drafting deal points and affordable housing agreements for federally assisted residential new construction, and acqu isition/rehabilitation projects, and/or review of affordable housing agreements, exhibits, and documents as to compliance with established HUD HOME regulations.

City of Baldwin Park| Proposal for Substantial Amendments and 2022 AAP 4 d. Prepare environmental review records for proposed HOME affordable housing projects.

3. Respond to HUD and Single Audit Letters and/or Memorandums as Needed a. Address and rectify all concerns and findings emanating from possible Agency or Federal Single Audit Reports.

4. CDBG and HOME Monitoring
a. Conduct desk and on-site CDBG subrecipient monitoring visits as required by regulation (monitoring typically occurs after the end of the program year). ✓ Prepare appointment letters.
✓ Conduct on -site visit with public service subrecipients, gather needed financial, beneficiary, and other necessary documentation to prepare monitoring report. ✓ Prepare monitoring report outlining subrecipient strengths and weaknesses, concerns, findings, and corrective actions to be taken. ✓ Follow-up with subrecipients on implementation of recommended corrective actions and prepare monitoring close-out letters as needed.
✓ Provide technical assistance to staff and CDBG public service providers as needed. b. Conduct desk and on-site HOME monitoring of affordable housing projects. ✓ Prepare appointment letters to property owners or management. ✓ Schedule on-site inspections to determine compliance with housing, local and state codes.
[Note: City may opt to use Building or Code Enforcement staff to conduct on -site inspections, or Lorraine Mendez & Associates, upon City’s r equest, may perform inspections.]
✓ Conduct on-site monitoring to include review of project documents and tenant files to ascertain project compliance with HOME requirements, e.g. rents, tenant income eligibility, occupancy eligibility, property standards, a ffirmative marketing and fair housing, and lease terms.
✓ Prepare monitoring reports and follow-up correspondence until monitoring close out.

Report will outline strengths and weaknesses, concerns, findings, and corrective actions to be taken.

5. Develop and Maintain HUD Grants Management Policies and Procedures Manual (Program Guidelines)

6. Prepare Annual Action Plans and Amendments to 5-Year Consolidated Plan a. Prepare draft and final Action Plan, amendments to the Action Plan and, if applicable, required amendments to 5-Year Consolidated Plan as needed, oversee public review, and submit to HUD via IDIS pursuant to HUD regulations.

7. Prepare Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPER)

City of Baldwin Park| Proposal for Substantial Amendments and 2022 AAP 5 a. Preparation of draft and final CAPER document, oversight of public review, and submittal to HUD via IDIS pursuant to HUD regulations.

City of Baldwin Park| Proposal for Substantial Amendments and 2022 AAP 6 Lorraine M. Mendez
2205 Spyglass Trail W.

Oxnard, CA 93036
(805) 665-7310
[email protected]

SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS
• Twenty years local government experience.
• B.A. degree in Economics with minor in Business Administration.

EMPLOYMENT HISTORY

Principal, Lorraine Mendez & Associates
March 2010 – Present: City of Westminster
May 2013 – Present: City of Huntington Beach
December 2019 – Present: City of Anaheim
December 2020 – Present: City of Henderson, Nevada
March – September 2020: City of Baldwin Park
January 2019 – December 2019: City of El Monte
July 2013 – December 2018: City of Garden Grove
July 2006 – November 2017: City of Huntington Park

• Assist in on-going administration of HUD’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) programs, including:
→ Preparation of Annual Action Plan, Five Year Consolidated Plan, and Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER).
→ Preparation of department protocols and procedures.
→ Management of the federal Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS) required to set-up, revise, fund, and report on accomplishments and program beneficiaries for all CDBG and HOME activities.
→ On-site monitoring for, and technical assistance to, each CDBG public service subrecipient to ensure compliance with federal requirements and adherence to the entity’s subrecipient agreement with the City.
→ Assumption of financial management responsibilities, such as preparing draw requests, approving payment requests, and monitoring CDBG/HOME expenditures. → Preparation of CDBG and HOME fiscal budget.
→ Monitoring of City’s HOME -assisted affordable ho using agreements including on -site monitoring of housing projects to ensure compliance with HOME regulations.

City of Baldwin Park| Proposal for Substantial Amendments and 2022 AAP 7 → Assistance with special assignments as needed including the development a code enforcement strategy for use of CDBG funding, in-depth auditing of the City’s minor home repair program, and review of staff reports, requests for proposals, and other department reports and correspondence.

Principal, Lorraine Mendez & Associates
July 2012 – 2016: City of Burbank
• Prepared CDBG Procedures Manual as required by HUD.

Sub-Consultant on Various Assignments
January 2007 – May 2009: Cities of Bakersfield, Burbank, Indio, Garden Grove, Santa Clarita
• July 2014 – 2016: Assisted GRC Associates with the development of the City of Bakersfield’s Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plan, Citizen Participation Plan, and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice reports.
• September 2012 – March 2014: Assisted Karen Warner Associates with the development of Burbank’s Consolidated Plan using the new eCon Planning Suite, and the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice reports.
• January 2009 – May 2009: Assisted Castaneda & Assoc with development of Indio’s 2009 - 2013 Consolidated P lan and 2009 -2010 Annual Action Plan using both a written plan submission and HUD’s Consolidated Plan Management Process (CPMP). • August 2008 – February 2009 : Assisted Solomon & Associates with the monitoring of affordable housing agreements of the Garden Grove Redevelopment Agency to ensure compliance with Federal HOME regulations.
• January 2007 – June 2007: Drafted City of Santa Clarita’s 2007 Annual Action Plan.

Administrative Analyst II
October 2000 – June 2005: Community Development Department, City of Burbank • Division manager for Community Development Department Administration Division • Coordinated budget for Department including General Fund, Special Revenue, Housing Authority, Redevelopment, CDBG, HOME, and CIP funds.
• Chaired the Budget Action Team (BAT), an intra -divisional committee responsible for recommending cost-reduction plans to include streamlining business processes, increasing revenues, and finding technological solutions to common business practices. • Prepared Housing and Redevelopment Division budget for 3 fiscal years. • Assisted in preparation of Annual HCD Report, Implementation Plan, State Controllers Report and other State and Federal mandated reports including gathering census data on population, ethnicity, households, housing occupancies, and income demographics.

City of Baldwin Park| Proposal for Substantial Amendments and 2022 AAP 8 SECTION 4 – KEY PERSONNEL

Lorraine Mendez & Associates is proposing to provide one staff person for the development of the aforementioned Substantial Amendments, HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, FY 2022/23 Annual Action Plan, and other tasks as required. Should additional support be needed, LM&A is able to provide supplementary staffing to assist with the contract services.

Ms. Mendez will assume responsibility for requested assignments pursuant to the scope of work with reliance on city staff to perform administrative support functions , such as p ublic and community meetings and presentations related to the adoption of the Plans. Ms. Mendez will provide all written Plans, staff reports, and public notices.

City of Baldwin Park| Proposal for Substantial Amendments and 2022 AAP 9 SECTION 5 – CLIENT REFERENCES

References for Lorraine Mendez
City of Westminster

Contact Information: Alexa Smittle, (714) 548-3674, [email protected]

Description of Services Provided : Management and implementation of CDBG and HOME programs, including entire scope of services listed in this proposal.

Dates of Work Performed: 2010 to Present

City of Huntington Beach

Contact Information: Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Director of Community Development, (714) 374-1519. [email protected]

Description of Services Provided : Annual Action Plan, CAPER, Amendments, IDIS, CDBG Monitoring, Environmental Review Records, Technical Assistance.

Dates of Work Performed: 2013 to Present

City of Anaheim

Contact Information : Albert Ramirez, Project Manager , (714) 765-4300 ext. 4826, [email protected]

Description of Services Provided: Assistance with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA

Dates of Work Performed: March 2020 to Present

City of Baldwin Park| Proposal for Substantial Amendments and 2022 AAP 10 SECTION 6 – COST PROPOSAL

Lorraine Mendez & Associates, LLC proposes to provide requested services set forth in this proposal up to the contract price not to exceed $50,000, plus reimbursable expenses. Pursuant to the City’s request, additional services are available and can be provided at an hourly rate, by an amendment to the original contract to add such services, or under a separate contact for such services.

Personnel Hourly Rate Average Weekly Hours
Lorraine Mendez $120/hour As Needed to complete
Substantial
Amendments, HOME-
ARP Allocation Plan, and
other tasks as needed.

Lorraine Mendez $10,000 fixed fee for FY
2022/23 Annual Action
Plan

Lorraine Mendez $9,500 fixed fee for FY
2021/22 CAPER

The Consultant will not bill for overhead. The following expenses directly attributable to work performed under this agreement shall be reimbursed at cost:

• Contract management necessary to manage, assign, review, invoice, etc. work performed by subcontractors at City’s request. Typical time allotted to such tasks is approximately 4 hours per month.
• Printing and reproduction costs associated with document reproduction. • Mileage expenses at IRS rate, currently $.56 per mile; rate to be updated as necessary. • Other expenses related to document preparation.

Any subcontractors brought on to serve under contract with Lorraine Mendez & Associates will serve as independent contractors, not Lorraine Mendez & Associates’ employees. Subcontractors and Lorraine Mendez agree to the following rights consistent with an independen t contractor relationship:

• Subcontractors have the right to perform services for others during the term of the Agreement.
• Subcontractors have the right to control and direct the means, manner and method by which the services required by the Agreement will be performed. • Lorraine Mendez & Associates shall not require Subcontractor to devote full time to performing the services required by the Agreement.
• Subcontractor is not eligible to participate in any employee pension, health, vacation pay, sick pay or other fringe benefit plan of Lorraine Mendez & Associates.

City of Baldwin Park| Proposal for Substantial Amendments and 2022 AAP 11 • Subcontractors shall pay all income taxes and FICA (Social Security and Medicare taxes) incurred while performing under the Agreement.
• Subcontractors will maintain independent insurance as required by the City.

Authorized Signature:

Type Name: Lorraine M. Mendez

Title: Principal

Date: January 19, 2021

AMENDMENT NUMBER 1

TO THE CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AND LORRAINE MENDEZ AND ASSOCIATES INC.

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This First Amendment to the Consultant Services Agreement (“First Amendment”) is made and entered into this March 16, 2022, by and between the City of Baldwin Park, (“City”), and Lorraine Mendez and Associates Inc. (“Consultant”).

2. RECITALS.

2.1 Agreement. City and Consultant entered into that certain Consultant Services Agreement dated August 6, 2021, (“Agreement”), whereby Consultant agreed to provide professional services associated with the preparation and completion of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) reports as defined in the Scope of Services attached to the referenced Agreement.

2.5 Amendment. City and Consultant mutually desire to amend the Consultant Services Contract Agreement for the first time and replace the Scope of Services attached to and incorporated into this Amendment as “Exhibit A” and Compensation attached to and incorporated into this Amendment as “Exhibit B”.

3. NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant agree as follows:

3.1 Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this First Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this First Agreement, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this First Amendment.

3.2 Adequate Consideration. The Parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this First Agreement.

3.3 Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed in duplicate originals, each of which is deemed to be an original, but when taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.

3.4 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this First Amendment on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this First Amendment on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this First Amendment, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this First Amendment and (iv) the entering into this First Amendment does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this First Amendment to be executed the day and year first above written.

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK: CONSULTANT: Lorraine Mendez and
Associates, Inc.

By: ___________________________ By: ____________________________ Enrique C. Zaldivar, CEO Lorraine Mendez, Principal
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: __________________________ By: ______________________________ Marlen Garcia, City Clerk Robert N. Tafoya, Esq., City Attorney

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF WORK
Preparation of the following documents:

1. Substantial Amendment to 2019/20 Annual Action Plan (CARES Act Amendment)

2. 2021/22 HOME-ARP Allocation Plan

3. FY 2022/23 Annual Action Plan

4. Other HUD Program Administration tasks including, but not limited to, assistance with HUD Monitoring response – Code Enforcement comprehensive plan, 2021/22 CAPER, and other administrative items on as needed basis.

EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION
The compensation for Lorraine Mendez & Associates, LLC services shall be set forth in this proposal up to the contract price not to exceed $50,000, plus reimbursable expenses.

Pursuant to the City’s request, additional services are available and can be provided at an hourly rate, by an amendment to the original contract to add such services, or under a separate contract for such services.

Personnel Hourly Rate Average Weekly Hours
Lorraine Mendez $120/hour As Needed to complete
Substantial Amendments,
HOME-ARP Allocation
Plan, and other tasks as
needed.

Lorraine Mendez $10,000 fixed fee for FY
2022/23 Annual Action
Plan
Lorraine Mendez $9,500 fixed fee for FY
2021/22 CAPER
The Consultant will not bill for overhead. The following expenses directly attributable to work performed under this agreement shall be reimbursed at cost:
 Contract management necessary to manage, assign, review, invoice, etc. work performed by subcontractors at City’s request. Typical time allotted to such tasks is approximately 4 hours per month.
 Printing and reproduction costs associated with document reproduction.  Mileage expenses at IRS rate, currently $.56 per mile; rate to be updated as necessary.
 Other expenses related to document preparation.

STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. ________SA-1_________
TO: Honorable Chair and Board Members of the Successor Agency to the Dissolved Community Development Commission of The City of Baldwin Park
FROM: Rose Tam, Director of Finance
DATE: March 16, 2022
SUBJECT: Successor Agency To The Dissolved Community
Development Commission of The City of Baldwin
Park Warrants and Demands

SUMMARY
Attached is the Warrants and Demands Register for the Successor Agency to the Dissolved Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park to be ratified by the City Council.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board ratify the attached Warrants and Demands Register.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total of the attached Warrants Register for Successor Agency of the City of Baldwin Park was $5,235.00.

BACKGROUND
The attached Claims and Demands report format meets the required information as set out in the California Government Code. Staff has reviewed the requests for expenditures for the appropriate budgetary approval and for the authorization from the department head or its designee. Pursuant to Section 37208 of the California Government Code, the Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee does hereby certify to the accuracy of the demands hereinafter referred. Payments released since the previous meeting and the following is a summary of the payment released:

1. The February 4 to March 3, 2022, Successor Agency Warrant with check number 13575 through 13576 in total amount of $ 5,235.00 was made on behalf of Successor Agency of the City of Baldwin Park constituting of claim and demand against the Successor Agency of the City of Baldwin Park, are herewith presented to the City Council as required by law, and hereby ratified.

LEGAL REVIEW
Not Applicable

ATTACHMENT

1. Check Register

STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. _______SA-2__________
TO: Honorable Chair and Board Members of the Successor Agency to the Dissolved Community Development Commission of the City of Baldwin Park
FROM: Rose Tam, Director of Finance
DATE: March 16, 2022
SUBJECT: Treasurer’s Report – January 2022

SUMMARY
Attached is the Treasurer’s Report for the month of January 2022. The Treasurer’s Report lists all cash for the City which includes the Baldwin Park Financing Authority, the Housing Authority, and the Successor Agency to the Community Development Commission (CDC). All investments are in compliance with the City’s Investment Policy and the California Government Code.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board receive and file the Treasurer’s Report for January 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT
None

BACKGROUND
City of Baldwin Park Investment Policy requires the Treasurer’s Report be submitted to the Mayor and City Council on a monthly basis.

LEGAL REVIEW
Not Applicable

ATTACHMENT

1. Exhibit “A”, Treasurer’s Report

STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. ________13_________
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ron Garcia, Acting Director of Community Development DATE: March 16, 2022
SUBJECT: A Request to the City Council from the Planning Commission on Multiple Zoning and General Plan Land
Use Changes which would Achieve Consistency with the
Downtown Specific Plan (Location: City ’s Downtown
Area; Applicant: City of Baldwin Park; Case Numbers: SP 22-01, GPA 22-01 and ZC 22-01)

SUMMARY
On February 23, 2022, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution PC 22-01 recommending that the City Council approve multiple zoning and general plan land use changes for the implementation of the Baldwin Park Downtown Specific Plan. The Downtown Specific Plan directs new growth to the downtown area where public, civic, and transit infrastructure exists and reinvestment is desirable, while protecting existing stable neighborhoods in Baldwin Park.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council:

1. Open the public hearing, hear public testimony; and

2. Adopt City Council Resolution 2022-012 entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park, California Adopting the Findings of Fact and Approving General Plan Land Use Amendments to Achieve Consistency with the Downtown Specific Plan”; and”; and

3. Introduce for first reading, by title only, Ordinance entitled: “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park Amending Chapter 153 of the Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) As it Pertains to Implementation of the Baldwin Park Downtown Specific Plan”.

CEQA\NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
As specified in Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Lead Agency shall prepare an Addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. The addendum found that the updates to the proposed Specific Plan would not introduce new significant environmental impacts beyond those which have already been identified and characterized in the 2016 Final Environmental Impact Report that was prepared for the approved Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan (SCH#2014121098).

A Notice of Public Hearing was posted in the Baldwin Park Press on Thursday, March 3 rd, City Hall, and the City’s website. Public Hearing Notices were also mailed to the owners and occupants within the boundary of the City’s Downtown area.

BACKGROUND
On February 17, 2016, the city approved the Downtown Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan (SP-15-01). The Specific Plan included an urban design framework, circulation, parking, zoning and development standards and guidelines to bring revitalizing activities to the Downtown and improve access to all modes of transportation including transit, walking and bicycling. The intent in creating the Specific Plan was to facilitate development especially residential development in the Downtown area proximate to the Metrolink Station. The primary objectives were to identify land use options that included increased housing densities and mixed uses, as well as to create pedestrian linkages between the station, community facilities and major recreation, retail, and residential nodes of activity.

Further the Downtown TOD Specific Plan was designed to facilitate the return of Downtown Baldwin Park as a vibrant and walkable heart of the city. The Plan was created to provide opportunities for developers to build on the City’s unique historical and cultural characteristics to enhance the Downtown core; take advantage of access to regional transit, including Metrolink and numerous Foothill Transit and Metro bus routes that serve downtown; create a strong community identity and sense of place; provide new employment, housing and shopping opportunities; and strengthen the City’s tax base.

Several opportunity sites within walking distance of the Metrolink and Transit Center parking structure were identified in the plan process that would allow for significant potential infill development and adaptive reuse of existing under-utilized structures to better serve the transit-oriented Downtown area and generate new investment. The main goal of the Downtown TOD Specific Plan was to guide future development of mixed uses in a walkable environment, streamline the development process and serve as an incentive for economic development. The build-out of the Specific Plan consisted of 833 residential units and 289,135-square feet of non-residential space.

Since the approval of the Specific Plan, City staff determined the existing maximum density of 30 du/ac and development standards limited potential housing development within the downtown area. In January of 2020 the City was awarded a $310,000, SB 2 planning grant from the State of California Housing and Community Development Department “(HCD)”. HCD launched the SB 2 Planning Grants Program to provide funding and technical assistance to all local governments in California to help cities and counties prepare, adopt, and implement plans and process improvements that streamline housing approvals and accelerate housing production.

The city utilized the grant to update the Specific Plan and associated environmental documents to allow for increased maximum density of 40 du/ac and implementation of greater flexibility development standards to incentivize the construction of housing.

DISCUSSION
The proposed Specific Plan would be implemented over a 14-year span (2021-2035) by a variety of participants, including city and county agencies, business and property owners, community members and groups, non-profit organizations, and elected and appointed officials.

The Downtown Baldwin Park Specific Plan is developed as a form-based code (FBC), to provide clear direction and predictable process and outcomes. The current specific plan is a hybrid consisting of traditional and form related standards (also called Euclidean after the legal case that established zoning as acceptable). Traditional zoning is primarily focused on the use. In FBCs, the focus is on the building form, uses are not necessarily separated, although they can be in cases such as single-family residential and manufacturing. In addition, FBCs place increased focus on the design of the public realm, the connection between the building and the street and open spaces (including sidewalk and parkway).

The Specific Plan provides standards that require that buildings be placed at or near the property line and restrict parking lots from separating the building from the street along the front property line.

Standards are established for setbacks, height, and lot size. Heights are limited to four stories (up to 50 feet) in the Downtown Core, up to three stories (up to 35 feet) with provision for four story element (up to 50 feet) in the Downtown Corridor, and two stories (up to 25 feet) with provision for three story element (up to 35 feet) in the Downtown Edge. Parking requirements are reduced and based on the principal that visitors will be able to park once and visit more than one building during their visit.

The Specific Plan also regulates the type of building and the frontage of the buildings. The purpose of those regulations is to provide appropriate scale and design for buildings on a lot, the height and the building massing. Frontages are regulated based on the varying uses and context.

The Downtown Specific Plan additionally includes Street and Block Standards. The street standards include existing and proposed street sections of the streets in the Downtown area. The Block standards establish standards for subdividing super-blocks into smaller blocks to transform the area into a walkable, interconnected street network. This would require large blocks like the Park Plaza on Maine and Value Plus Market place to create new streets and blocks at such time as they wish to redevelop their properties. The Plan also identifies existing natural, built, and socio-economic assets; a community-supported shared vision for implementation; goals and policies to guide decision-makers; actions to develop projects and partnerships to implement the goals and policies; catalytic public and private projects to spur economic investment, and residential and commercial development in Downtown; and streetscape improvements to activate the public realm, providing an inviting and engaging urban core.

Development Potential
The existing Specific Plan covers an area of 115 acres and accommodated up to 833 new residential units, for a total of 934 residential units, and a non-residential capacity increase of 289,135 square feet (SF) for a total of 1,175,673 SF of non-residential capacity.

The proposed covers 122-acre Plan area and would accommodate up to 1,745 residential units and 186,981 SF of non-residential uses within the Downtown Core, Downtown Corridor, and Downton Edge zoning districts. The table below provides a comparison between existing development of the approved Specific Plan and development with the proposed Specific Plan.

Comparison of Approved and Proposed Specific Plans

FINDINGS OF FACT- AMENDMENT TO THE ZONE CHANGE

1. The zoning map amendments are consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan.

The zone change would be consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. The adoption by ordinance of the specific plans and the associated zone changes for the identified properties implements two General Plan goals: Goal 1.0 of the Land Use Element states that that the City should maintain a balanced mix and distributions of land uses throughout Baldwin Park. Goal 2.0 of the Land Use Element directs the city to accommodate new development that is compatible with and complements existing conforming land uses. The amendments furthermore provide consistency between the zoning map and the General Plan land use map

2. The amendment would not adversely affect surrounding properties.

The Specific Plan includes a form-based code that carefully considers existing development and facilitates context sensitive new development. A variety of new and existing parks and open space are weaved together with walkable streets within a contextual development framework that would complement and enhance adjacent residential, commercial, and mixed-use areas.

3. The amendment promotes public health, safety, and general welfare.

Safe streets, crime prevention strategies through environmental design, and various places of gathering would improve the overall safety, physical and mental health, and social and economic welfare of the downtown area and the larger community surrounding the downtown.

4. The amendment serves the goals and purposes of the zoning code.

FINDINGS OF FACT – GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
1) The amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan.

The General Plan amendments are consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan in that they would avoid creating a General Plan/zoning inconsistency in land use recommendation with the identified Specific Plan areas. 2) The amendment would not adversely affect surrounding properties.

The General Plan amendments would not adversely affect surrounding properties as the amendments will ensure consistency with the zoning designation and standards in the identified specific plan. Development of the identified properties with the amended General Plan designation would complement and enhance adjacent residential, commercial, and mixed-use areas and implement Goal 2.0 of the Land Use Element, which directs the City to accommodate new development that is compatible with and complements existing conforming land uses.
3) The amendment promotes public health, safety, and general welfare.

The General Plan amendments promote public health, safety, and general welfare of adjacent properties and the City as a whole by providing zoning/General Plan consistencies within the specific plan areas and ensuring the orderly development of the identified parcels and specific plans.
4) The amendment serves the goals and purposes of the zoning code.

The General Plan amendments serves the goals and purpose of the zoning code in that they provide for the orderly and compatible development of new uses that will enhance the character of the community while creating additional housing and mixed-use development options.

PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
On February 23, 2022, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 22-01recommending approval to the City Council on multiple zoning and general plan land use changes for the implementation of the Baldwin Park Downtown Specific Plan. The Downtown Specific Plan directs new growth to the downtown area where public, civic, and transit infrastructure exists and reinvestment is desirable, while protecting existing stable neighborhoods in Baldwin Park.

LEGAL REVIEW
This report has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and content.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Specific Plan 22-01(https://www.baldwinpark.com/online-documents/community- development/planning/specific-plans/downtown-tod-specific-plan/2860-draft-tod-downtown- specific-plan1/file )

2. Vicinity Map

3. Addendum to the Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan EIR (SCH#2014121098) (https://www.baldwinpark.com/online-documents/community-development/planning/specific- plans/downtown-tod-specific-plan/2860-draft-tod-downtown-specific-plan1/file )

4. Draft City Council General Plan Amendment Resolution 2022-012

5. Draft City Council Zoning Ordinance

6. Planning Commission Resolution 22-01
Please use the following link to access the Specific Plan 22-01:

Specific Plan 22-01(https://www.baldwinpark.com/online- documents/community-development/planning/specific-plans/downtown-tod- specific-plan/2860-draft-tod-downtown-specific-plan1/file ) If you wish to view the Specific Plan in person, please schedule and appointment with the City Planning Department by emailing Acting Director of Community Development/City Planner Ron Garcia at
[email protected] or by phone at (626) 960-4011 ext. 475.

VICINITY MAP

CASE NUMBER: SP 22-01, GPA 22-01, ZC 22-01

LOCATION: City’s Downtown Area

DATE: March 16, 2022

Please use the following link to access the addendum to the Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan EIR (SCH# 2014121098):
(https://www.baldwinpark.com/online-documents/community- development/planning/specific-plans/downtown-tod-specific-plan/2860- draft-tod-downtown-specific-plan1/file)
If you wish to view the Addendum to the Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan EIR (SCH#20141211098) in person, please schedule and appointment with the City Planning Department by emailing Acting Director of Community Development/City Planner Ron Garcia at
[email protected] or by phone at (626) 960-4011 ext. 475.

RESOLUTION 2022-013

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN

PARK, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND

APPROVING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENTS TO

ACHIEVE CONSISTENCY WITH THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 65300 of the Government Code, the City of Baldwin Park adopted a General Plan with long range planning goals and objections and land use recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park adopted the Downtown Specific Plan, (hereinafter “Specific Plan”) setting forth all conditions of land use and development within the Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Baldwin Park Community Development Department has proposed amendments to the land use designations of approximately 122 acres within the Downtown Specific Plan (see Attachment A); and
WHEREAS, amendment to the General Plan is required in conjunction with the amendment to the adopted Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, by adoption of this Resolution, the City Council approves the amendment to the General Plan and the Specific Plan entailing changes in land use designations within said property in the Downtown area as shown in “Attachment A”; and WHEREAS, the City Council held legally, noticed public hearings to amend the General Plan and all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Based upon information provided, the staff report presented to the City Council regarding the Application, and the testimony received at the hearing, the City Council hereby finds and determines:
a) The amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan.

The General Plan amendments are consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan in that they would avoid creating a General Plan/zoning inconsistency in land use recommendation with the identified Specific Plan areas. b) The amendment would not adversely affect surrounding properties.

The General Plan amendments would not adversely affect surrounding properties as the amendments will ensure consistency with the zoning designation and standards in the identified specific plan. Development of the identified properties with the amended General Plan designation would complement and enhance adjacent residential, commercial, and mixed use areas and implement Goal 2.0 of the Land Use Element, which directs the City to accommodate new development that is compatible with and complements existing conforming land uses.
c) The amendment promotes public health, safety, and general welfare.

The General Plan amendments promote public health, safety, and general welfare of adjacent properties and the City as a whole by providing zoning/General Plan consistencies within the specific plan areas and ensuring the orderly development of the identified parcels and specific plans.
d) The amendment serves the goals and purposes of the zoning code.

SECTION 3. Any potential impacts associated with the Specific Plan are consistent with potential impacts characterized and mitigated for in the 2016 approved Specific Plan EIR, no new significant impacts or impacts of substantially greater severity than previously described would occur as a result of the proposed Specific Plan, and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(c), an Addendum is included in the public record for the approved Specific Plan.

SECTION 4. Based upon the findings set forth above, and its legislative discretion, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the General Plan Land Use Changes pursuant to Attachment A of this Resolution shall be approved.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the Secretary of the Planning Commission.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____ day of March, 2022. _____________________________
Emmanuel Estrada
MAYOR
ATTEST:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
I, MARLEN GARCIA, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on March _____, 2022 by the following vote to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
__________________________________

MARLEN GARCIA

CITY CLERK
ATTACHMENT A: General Plan Land Use Map

ORDINANCE NO. XXXX

AN ORDINANCE OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN
PARK AMENDING CHAPTER 153 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
(ZONING ORDINANCE) AS IT PERTAINS TO IMPLEMENTATION OF

THE BALDWIN PARK DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, directing new growth to the downtown area where public, civic, and transit infrastructure exists and reinvestment is desirable, protects existing stable neighborhoods in Baldwin Park; and
WHEREAS, downtown development is the best opportunity to increase property and sales tax revenue and to maintain and enhance the retail and small business core for Baldwin Park; and
WHEREAS, specific plan can streamline the development of affordable housing within the downtown area consistent with Baldwin Park’s legal obligation to provide its fair share of affordable housing need in the region; and WHEREAS, specific plan can provide a balance between predictable development review process, development outcomes that add to and reinforce the downtown vibrancy and sense of place, while offering flexibility for all types of development; and
WHERAS, adopted specific plan and their associated environmental documentation can provide potential developers with a sense of security when pursuing a development project at the same time ensure high quality architecture, landscape architecture, and urban design outcomes for the downtown area; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan will provide consistency between the Zoning designations and General Plan Land Use designations, as required by State Law, on the various properties within previously approved specific plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitations are hereby adopted by the City Council as findings. Based on those findings, the City Council determines the public health, safety and general welfare of the City of Baldwin Park, its residents, property owners, businesses and visitors can be enhanced by amending the zoning map to reflect the subject changes as shown in Attachment “A” is in the best interest of the community to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City; and
SECTION 2. Based on the foregoing findings and determinations, City Council adopts the findings of fact as follows relating to zone map amendments:
1) The zoning map amendments are consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan.

The zone change would be consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. The adoption by ordinance of the specific plans and the associated zone changes for the identified properties implements two General Plan goals: Goal 1.0 of the Land Use Element states that that the City should maintain a balanced mix and distributions of land uses throughout Baldwin Park. Goal 2.0 of the Land Use Element directs the City to accommodate new development that is compatible with and complements existing conforming land uses. The amendments furthermore provide consistency between the zoning map and the General Plan land use map. 2) The amendment would not adversely affect surrounding properties.

SECTION 3. Potential impacts associated with the Specific Plan are consistent with potential impacts characterized and mitigated for in the 2016 approved Specific Plan EIR. No new significant impacts or impacts of substantially greater severity than previously described would occur as a result of the proposed Specific Plan. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(c), an Addendum is included in the public record for the approved Specific Plan.

SECTION 4. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its final reading and adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____ day of _____, 2022. _____________________________
Emmanuel Estrada
MAYOR
ATTEST:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

XXXX was duly approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on _____, 2022 by the following vote to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
__________________________________

MARLEN GARCIA

CITY CLERK
ATTACHMENT A: Zoning Map

RESOLUTION NO. PC 22-01

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION

OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK RECOMMENDING

THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE FINDINGS OF

FACT AND APPROVE MULTIPLE ZONING AND

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CHANGES WHICH

WOULD ACHIEVE CONSISTENCY WITH THE
DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (LOCATION: CITY’S
DOWNTOWN AREA; APPLICANT: CITY OF
BALDWIN PARK; CASE NUMBERS: SP 22-01, GPA
22-01 AND ZC 22-01)

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF
BALDWIN PARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, an amendment to the General Plan is required in conjunction with the amendment to the adopted Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, changes in land use designations within said property in the Downtown area are required to achieve consistency with the Downtown Specific plan; and
WHEREAS, A duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Baldwin Park on February 23, 2022 to receive comments and consider an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zone Change to achieve consistency with the Downtown Specific Plan.

SECTION 2. The Planning Commission based upon it’s public review recommends that the City Council adopt the findings of fact relating to the General Plan Land Use Map Update.

A. The amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan.

B. The amendment would not adversely affect surrounding properties.

The General Plan amendments would not adversely affect
surrounding properties as the amendments will ensure consistency Resolution PC 22-01
February 23, 2022

Page 2 ends

with the zoning designation and standards in the identified specific plan. Development of the identified properties with the amended General Plan designation would complement and enhance adjacent residential, commercial, and mixed-use areas and implement Goal

2.0 of the Land Use Element, which directs the City to
accommodate new development that is compatible with and complements existing conforming land uses.

C. The amendment promotes public health, safety, and general welfare.

D. The amendment serves the goals and purposes of the zoning code
The General Plan amendments serves the goals and purpose of the zoning code in that they provide for the orderly and compatible development of new uses that will enhance the character of the community while creating additional housing and mixed-use development options.

SECTION 3. The Planning Commission, based upon its public review, recommends that the City Council approve and adopt the update to the General Plan Land Use Map designations for consistency with the downtown specific plan by restating and amending the current General Plan Land Use Map.

SECTION 4. The Planning Commission based upon it’s public review recommends that the City Council adopt the findings of fact relating to the Zoning Change:

A. The zoning map amendments are consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan
The zone change would be consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. The adoption by ordinance of the specific plans and the associated zone changes for the identified properties implements two General Plan goals: Goal 1.0 of the Land Use Element states that that the City should maintain a balanced mix and distributions of land uses throughout Baldwin Park. Goal 2.0 of Resolution PC 22-01
February 23, 2022

Page 3 ends

the Land Use Element directs the City to accommodate new development that is compatible with and complements existing conforming land uses. The amendments furthermore provide consistency between the zoning map and the General Plan land use map
B. The amendment would not adversely affect surrounding properties.

C. The amendment promotes public health, safety, and general welfare.

D. The amendment serves the goals and purposes of the zoning code.

The zone change provides for the orderly and compatible development of new uses that will enhance the character of the community while creating additional affordable housing, commercial, and mixed-use development options. Adoption by ordinance of the zone designation changes also provides the City with additional enforceability with regard to specific zoning regulations SECTION 5. The Planning Commission, based upon its public review, recommends that the City Council approve and adopt multiple zoning and general plan land use changes which would achieve consistency with the downtown specific plan, in its entirety.

SECTION 6. Any potential impacts associated with the Specific Plan are consistent with potential impacts characterized and mitigated for in the 2016 approved Specific Plan EIR, no new significant impacts or impacts of substantially greater severity than previously described would occur as a result of the proposed Specific Plan, and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(c), an Addendum is included in the public record for the approved Specific Plan.

Resolution PC 22-01
February 23, 2022

Page 4 ends

SECTION 7. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and forward a copy hereof to the City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park.

PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of February, 2022.
____________________________________

JOANNA VALENZUELA,MADAM CHAIR

BALDWIN PARK PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS.

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
I, RON GARCIA, Secretary of the City of Baldwin Park Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution PC 22-01 was duly and regularly approved and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 23rd day of February, 2022 by the following vote:

Resolution PC 22-01
February 23, 2022

Page 5 ends

AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Cleave, Mayor Pro
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None
_________________________________

RON GARCIA, SECRETARY

BALDWIN PARK PLANNING COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. ________14_________
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Enrique C. Zaldivar, Chief Executive Officer
Rose Tam, Director of Finance
Ron Garcia, Acting Director of Community Development
DATE: March 16, 2022
SUBJECT: Baldwin Park Resident Owned Utility District (BPROUD) Program-Decertification and Reversion Process-Summary
Report

SUMMARY
Upon City Council direction provided to Staff at its meeting of June 16, 2021, we embarked on a re- evaluation process of the City’s BPROUD Program that would analyze the underpinnings of the merits of the program as articulated at its inception, to determine whether they remained valid, in light of the fact that the program found itself at a financial deficit, and in need of a customer rate adjustment to rectify the imbalance.

With the assistance of the Cordoba Corporation team, Staff conducted an analysis of the BPROUD Program and presented its findings to the City Council at its meeting of October 6, 2021. Staff determined that the merits originally attached to the BPROUD program and presented to the City Council had in effect not materialized and its underpinnings were no longer valid; thus, recommended that the City Council make a finding that the city should no longer be in the electricity supply business, and further that the city decertify as a Community Choice Aggregator (CCA) agency and revert its generation business back to Southern California Edison (SCE).

City Council concurred with Staff findings and instructed staff to proceed with the decertification and reversion process, starting with the City Council’s declaration of its intent to decertify. This launched an inherently laborious, nerve-wracking, complicated process which had no precedent other than another CCA in Riverside County that had an emergency bankruptcy proceeding with all the challenges associated with it.

We are happy and proud to present to you this report which in effect is the conclusion of the Decertification and Reversion Process of the BPROUD Program with all the good indicators, starting with a very smooth and seamless transition completed as of March 5, 2022, 17,522 (99.99%) of all 17,524 residential, institutional, and commercial customers, without any interruption of service or administrative confusion.

And as a general statement, the financial outcomes at the conclusion of the process, are overall positive. We will be able to recoup a greater majority of the General Fund loans and transfers made during the time in which the program was at a deficit, which amount to $2.637 million, and cover consultant and other associated costs.

Truly a testament to the collaborative relationship with all the partners engaged in this difficult undertaking, and herein recognized and appreciated: California Choice Energy Authority (CalChoice) and its family of subconsultants (Pacific Energy Advisors, Bayshore Consulting Group, Calpine Energy Solutions (Calpine), Maher Accounting, Braun Blaising Smith Wynn (BBSW), Hall Energy Law (Hall Energy); Southern California Edison (SCE), The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC); and your very own City Staff and Consultants (Office of the CEO, Department of Finance, Department of Community Development, City Attorney, Chief of Police, Cordoba Corporation, Best, Best and Krieger Law firm).

This report memorializes to a large extent the transactional activity that took place during the reversion and decertification process, as well as it identifies remaining future related activities, that while seemingly inconsequential, must still be done as part of our regulatory compliance, or as contractual obligations.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt and approve the City Council Resolution No. 2022-013 and authorize the Chief Executive Officer to submit a final letter of withdrawal as an associate member of CalChoice; and

2. Approve an amendment to the City’s Administrative Services Agreement (ASA) with CalChoice and its family of consultants that will reduce the monthly fee roughly from $55,000 monthly to $36,000 monthly and terminating at the end of June 2022, granting the Chief Executive Officer authorization to make minor adjustments to the contract prior to final execution, while keeping to the material, Council approval intact; and

3. Recognize the fund proceeds received from the disposition of the BPROUD energy contracts in its portfolio; and

4. Authorize the CEO and Director of Finance to transfer the proceeds from the BPROUD Lockbox to the General Fund (Fund #100) and the Future Development Fund (Fund #200) for any costs, transfers and loans incurred from these funds as deemed appropriate upon final payment of energy supply and other related invoices; and

5. Authorize the CEO to take any and all actions necessary to effectuate the deregistration process, including, but not limited to, submitting a final letter to the CPUC attesting to the completion of the deregistration process and requesting CPUC concurrence with a statement of further regulatory compliance obligations as a decertified CCA no longer serving load, and obtaining verification and certification of all remaining compliance obligations, such as Renewables Portfolio Standard requirements; and

6. Authorize the CEO, Director of Finance, and City Attorney to effectuate any administrative agreements with SCE that would settle and resolve outstanding receivables from former BPROUD customers that would remain beyond June 2022; and

7. Recognize that the City will take custody of all customer data (electronic form) related to BPROUD held by Calpine and will safeguard the data in accordance with CPUC and City data retention guidelines; and

8. Recognize the recall and release of the BPROUD Letter of Credit deposit of $147,000 held by the River City Bank for the benefit of SCE and returned to the City upon SCE confirmation of the completion of the reversion and acknowledgement by the CPUC; and

9. Recognize the receipt of $112K provided to BPROUD by the State’s Customer Arrearage Relief Program (CAPP); and

10.Authorize the CEO to enter into a subsequent agreement with Direct Energy Business Marketing, LLC/NRG (DEBM/NRG) who will act as the scheduling coordinator for the City of Baldwin Park for California Independent Service Operator (CAISO) related energy settlements from the scheduling and actual usage of energy during the time that BPROUD was serving customers, that will take place for several months beyond the actual delivery of energy to BPROUD customers; and

11.Authorize the Director of Finance to continue the banking relationship with River City Bank for BPROUD “lockbox” security services until such time as not required pursuant to contractual obligations; and

12. Establish a standing communication forum between City Staff and SCE that will facilitate and ensure that the service needs of Baldwin Park residents are always addressed.

FISCAL IMPACT
Proceeds from the liquidation and reassignment of BPROUD energy supply contracts yielded a net $2,918,000; plus, receipts from recall of the Letter of Credit worth $147,000 and the California Arrearage Payment Program (CAPP) of $111,537 for a total of $ $3,176,537. Costs include the recovery of the General Fund loans and transfers of $2,637,568, estimated professional and legal services of $344,697, SCE Re-entry fees of $8,375, and pre-existing expenses prior to the deregistration process of $272,542. Outstanding receivables from customer bill payments will be made after the date of this Staff Report, as well as final financial true ups with the California Independent System Operator (CAISO). BPROUD will be deregistered with little additional financial impact to the City’s General Fund pending closure of the outstanding items. There will be no service impact to the customers.

BACKGROUND
• Previously it was shown that BPROUD could incur substantial losses because of generation costs doubling while rates to customers remained constant • To operate BPROUD, the city provided a loan and transfers totaling $2.6M • If the City decided to de-certify BPROUD by February 2022, the range of losses were conservatively forecasted to be between $1.1M-$1.9M.
• This range was based on increasing rates by 30% and the sale of energy supply contracts held by BPROUD.

1. A range of potential outcomes was presented which were dependent upon market conditions and supplier negotiations. The final results were more favorable than anticipated.

2. The losses did not include the following (included in the Financial Impact section below) • Previous fiscal year losses and startup costs
• SCE fees for returning customers to SCE, and the only previous example was Western Community Energy, which was in the millions
• CalChoice services March-June, legal services, and Cordoba services • Upon the recommendations of staff, the City decided to discontinue its CCA program and return customers to SCE in February 2022, and to increase rates by 30% retroactive to September 2021 to offset operating costs.

Soonest Re-entry to
SCE Feb 2022
CalChoice Term Expires
August 2022
First In The Green
Apr-23
Worst case: No rate increase and generation contract losses of 25% -4,954,136 -5,469,279 -7,665,237 Likely case: No rate increase and no generation contract losses -2,954,136 -3,469,279 -5,665,237 Possible case: 30% rate increase and no generation contract losses -1,854,436 -851,903 -425,404 Best case: 30% rate increase and generation contract gains of 10% -1,054,436 -51,903 374,596

DISCUSSION
Activities Conducted To-Date
• Held multiple weekly meetings with SCE, CalChoice, Baldwin Park team, and the CPUC to ensure progress toward the goal of a seamless transition for customers back to SCE bundled service. During these meetings issues were addressed and solved

1. To date, all customers have been transitioned with the exception of one that will be transitioned in the near future.
• Key activities included the following:

1. Sent the CPUC an official Notice of Deregistration letter

2. SCE submitted their re-entry fee of $8K, much lower than anticipated based on mutual agreement between the City and SCE regarding the most favorable time from a financial perspective to return customers to SCE

3. SCE billing system had an issue with the retroactive rate increase of 30%, resulting in delayed revenue for the first two weeks in December. The issue was resolved, and all revenue was collected

4. SCE and Calpine conducted a pilot of 119 BPROUD customers to ensure that no issues occurred during the transition back to SCE. No significant issues occurred. • CalChoice conducted several negotiations with energy suppliers and was able to liquidate or assign the contracts for a net benefit of $2.9M (much higher than anticipated)

1. Contracts consisted of three main categories: conventional CAISO energy hedges; Resource Adequacy (RA), a compliance product; and Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS), as mandated by the state.
• Hedge contracts were successfully negotiated for $3.025M • RA responsibilities were assumed by the city of Lancaster for a cost of $107K • RPS responsibilities are being assumed by CalChoice for no financial impact • Legal counsel (BBK, BBSW) coordinated with the CPUC to identify future regulatory requirements related to RA and RPS, and Integrated Resource Planning (IRP)

1. Given that there have been no CCAs that have voluntarily stopped service to customers, there were no established proceedings on how to handle these regulatory requirements

2. However, the team has made great progress and several requirements have been waived. We are awaiting additional CPUC formal decisions regarding regulatory compliance requirements in the near future
• Communicated with customers regarding the return transition of customers to SCE bundled service: direct mail, newsletter, social media, BPROUD website, and bill messaging • Customer calls to the call center were tracked for complaints or issues related to the transition.

Only 12 customers called, with no complaints
• To reduce customer confusion, customers who started new electrical service during the month of January 2022 were enrolled early in SCE service, rather than BPROUD.

Financial Impacts
 Previously it was forecasted that the City could potentially incur a loss between $1.1M-1.9M  Below is a table that details the financial transactions to date

1. There are two transactions not included in the table that could impact the bottom line:
remaining account receivables/payables (end of April) and the CAISO settlements (end of May)
 Not considering these two outstanding issues, the City should recover the majority of its general funds used to supplement the operation of the BPROUD project. Below are the details:

1. FY 20-21 losses were $273K

2. GF loans and transfer to BPROUD were $2.638M

3. Liquidation and assignment of energy supply contracts netted $2.918M

4. CalChoice services through June will be $145K, a reduction from the previous estimate of $217K due to the winding down of services provided after the return of customers to SCE

5. Baldwin Park professional services of $200K, including legal and consultant fees, and printing

6. Letter of credit worth $147K will be returned to Baldwin Park upon approval of SCE and the CPUC, estimated to be by the end of April

7. Receipt of $112K in CAPP funds from the State of California in January to offset customer accounts receivable incurred during the pandemic.

Objective
Activity Pluses
(Revenue)
Minuses
(Cost) Balance Description
Previous Fiscal Year
Start Up Costs $ (95,029) BPROUD program start up
Net Income/(Loss) from FY 2020-21-BPROUD
Fund 450
$ (177,514) Loss was reported in the previous FY before loans from the GF
Summary costs from previous Fiscal Years $ (272,542) Costs that occurred in previous Fiscal Years Current Fiscal Year
General Fund Loans to BPROUD (2,637,568)$ July 2021-November 2021 Negotiated Contract sales $ 2,918,000 Includes hedge contracts, RA contracts. Assumes that remaining IRP and RPS will not incur costs or
revenue
CalChoice Professional Services (144,697)$ Revised CalChoice fees include legal fees from Blansing and Hall. Services after June would be on
an as needed basis. Originally, CC submitted full
costs services through August totaling $302,083.

Baldwin Park Professional Services $ (200,000) Legal, Study, Printing SCE Re-entry fees $ (8,375) Once reversion is complete, BP will pay SCE Letter of Credit after decertification $ 147,000 Once reversion is complete SCE will release BP from obligation of letter of credit
California Arrearage Payment Program (CAPP) $ 111,537 Payment from California program Delayed billing & Payment Arrangements TBD TBD Negotiate final outstanding amount by June, 2022 Account Receivables/Payables TBD TBD Majority will be computed by April, 2022, some lingering payment arrangements could continue
thru the end of 2022
CAISO Settlements TBD TBD Majority will be computed by May, 2022 Current Fiscal Year Revenue/Cost/Balance $ 3,176,537 $ (2,990,640) $ 185,897 Does not include potential Accounts Receivables and CAISO Settlements
Total Revenue/Cost/Balance $ 3,176,537 $ (3,263,182) $ (86,645) Does not include potential Accounts Receivables and CAISO Settlements
To forecast the financial impact through June 2022. October City Council presentation ferecasted Estimated BPROUD Financial Impacts
SCE
A great partnership was established early on, despite the term nerve-wracking used earlier in the report, this was overall a successful implementation and a positive experience for all those involved, most importantly the customers.
 By the numbers

1. 12/8-12/29: 119 customers transitioned & 100% billed

2. 1/28-2/28: 17,522 customers transitioned & 96.7% billed as of 3/7/22  This includes 125 Net Energy Metering (NEM) customers  One account pending transition
 Activities

1. All accounts transitioned on their Meter Read Date (MRD), which minimized billing issues and all but eliminated impact to the customer

2. All accounts eligible for BPROUD service had their CCA eligible profile end-dated to 12/31/21, eliminating the potential of customers enrolling with BPROUD in early 2022 and then being returned to SCE service after a short period

3. Calls to SCE from customers in the city of Baldwin Park were systematically routed to an elevated customer service team; this guaranteed that any BPROUD-related calls were handled by agents who were knowledgeable about the nuances and potential pain-points customers may have experienced during the reversion

4. Beginning in October 2021, SCE held multiple internal meetings with all relevant departments (Billing, IT, Customer Service, etc.) to ensure all stakeholders were well informed

5. Beginning in October 2021, SCE held a weekly meeting with external partners (city of Baldwin Park, Cordoba, CalChoice, etc.) to provide updates, strategize, and reach consensus on pertinent issues

6. Looking ahead
 SCE will ensure the one remaining customer is transitioned back to SCE service on their February MRD
 SCE will partner with BPROUD to ensure customers receive their final bills in a timely manner
 SCE will continue to meet with BPROUD at an agreed-upon cadence, providing updates & seeking input as necessary
 For all returned customers, SCE will provide generation and delivery of electrical service.
 Will there be changes to SCE’s relationship with Baldwin Park? o Customer wise, no different from any of SCE’s other customers. The only difference to the customer is that SCE will once again be providing the generation of their electrical service; once all CCA charges have been reconciled, the BPROUD portion of the bill will go away.
o Although the SCE team that manages CCAs would no longer meet directly with Baldwin Park, the city would still be engaged with their public affairs advisor, as an SCE customer would be able to participate in eligible programs, etc.

CalChoice
 Great partner, continue to provide service thru June to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements
 Negotiated liquidation and reassignment of energy supply contracts to minimize exposure to Baldwin Park
 Managed deregistration process with CPUC for the benefit of Baldwin Park to minimize on-going regulatory compliance requirements.

Regulatory Requirements
 BBSW and BB&K have been working with the CPUC to identify the remaining regulatory obligations for BPROUD, including withdrawing from the RPS and IRP proceedings and satisfying remaining requirements
 A letter is being prepared and will be sent to the CPUC describing the regulatory obligations that have been satisfied and asking for CPUC acknowledgement and an expeditious decertification  BPROUD anticipates working with the CPUC on closing out remaining requirements, including final verification and certification of RPS obligations by the CPUC and CEC.

ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives recommended.

LEGAL REVIEW
This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Joint Powers Resolution 2022-013

2. Amended Agreement with California Choice Energy Authority RESOLUTION NO. 2022-013

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN

PARK, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S WITHDRAWAL

FROM THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT

REGARDING THE CALIFORNIA CHOICE ENERGY AUTHORITY AND

DIRECTING THE TAKING OF FURTHER ACTIONS RELATED

THERETO
WHEREAS, the City of Baldwin Park ("City") is a municipal corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of California, with the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park ("City Council") serving as the governing body of the City; and WHEREAS, the California Choice Energy Authority ("Authority") is a joint exercise of powers authority created under the Joint Exercise of Powers Act (California Government Code Section 6500, et seq.) by that certain agreement dated August 14, 2012, and originally entitled "Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Clean Energy Authority" ("JPA Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the Authority changed its name to the "California Choice Energy Authority" via its adoption of the First Amendment to the JPA Agreement on March 28, 2017; and
WHEREAS, Section 12 of the JPA Agreement provides that public agencies may be added as parties to the JPA Agreement, and thereby become members of the Authority, upon the following: (i) the filing with the Authority of an executed counterpart of the JPA Agreement, together with a copy of the resolution of the governing body of the joining public agency approving the JPA Agreement and the execution and delivery thereof; and (ii) adoption of a resolution of the Authority's governing body approving the addition of such public agency as a member; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 2019-16 on April 17, 2019 authorizing the City to become a party to the Agreement and a member of the Authority; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that withdrawing from the Agreement and as a member of the Authority will further the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Based on the staff report, presentation, public comment, and other matters presented to the City Council during its consideration of this matter, the City Council finds and declares that the foregoing recitals are true and correct, and hereby incorporated as substantive findings of this Resolution.

Section 2. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the City to withdraw from the JPA Agreement, and thereby approves and authorizes the City to withdraw its membership in the Authority. The City Manager is authorized and directed to execute a withdrawal from the JPA Agreement on behalf of the City and file the same, along with a copy of this Resolution, with the Authority pursuant to Section 12 of the JPA Agreement.

Section 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City to enter into, and the City Manager is authorized and directed to execute on the City's behalf, an amendment to the administrative services agreement with the Authority for the wind-down of its Community Choice Aggregation (“CCA”) operations in a form substantially similar to that attached hereto as Exhibit "A" ("Services Agreement"). The City Council further authorizes the Authority to enter into any ancillary agreements required in connection with the Services Agreement on behalf of the City.

Section 4. The City Council hereby authorizes the City to enter into, and the City Manager is authorized and directed to execute on the City's behalf, a termination agreement with regard to the security agreement, inter-creditor agreement, and one or more account control agreements in a form substantially similar to those respective agreements as are attached hereto as Exhibit "B" ("Termination of Security Agreements").

The City Council further authorizes the Authority to enter into any ancillary agreements on behalf of the City required in connection with the Termination of Security Agreements.

Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The City Clerk shall enter this Resolution into the official book of resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of March 2022.

EMMANUEL J. ESTRADA, MAYOR
ATTEST:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } ss:

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK }
I, Marlen Garcia, City Clerk of the City of Baldwin Park do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022.013 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park at a regular meeting thereof held on March 16, 2022, and that the same was adopted by the following vote to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None

MARLEN GARCIA

CITY CLERK
1 REVISED CALCHOICE SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH BROUD

AMENDED AND RESTATED

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
(CITY OF BALDWIN PARK),
Dated March __, 2022
between

CALIFORNIA CHOICE ENERGY AUTHORITY,
as
Provider,
and

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK,
as Customer
2 AMENDED AND RESTATED ADMINISTRATIVE

SERVICES AGREEMENT (CITY OF BALDWIN
PARK)
This AMENDED AND RESTATED ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT (CITY OF BALDWIN PARK) (this “Agreement”), dated as of March __, 2022 (the “Effective Date ”), is between California Choice Energy Authority, a California joint powers authority (“Provider”), and City of Baldwin Park, a municipal corporation and general law city organized and operating under the laws of the State of California (“Customer”). Provider and Customer are sometimes referred to in this Agreement individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

R E C I T A L S
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Public Utilities Code (the “Code”) Sections 366.1,et. seq., Customer has been registered as a “community choice aggregator” (“CCA”) (as defined in the Code), which has been established for the purpose of delivering community choice aggregation services to certain customers located within its boundaries; WHEREAS, pursuant to Code Section 366.2, Customer submitted its implementation plan to the California Public Utilities Commission (the “CPUC”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Code Section 366.2, a community choice aggregator may enter into agreements for services to facilitate the sale and purchase of electricity and other related services; and
WHEREAS, Provider has also been registered as a CCA and has expertise and knowledge in the management and administration of community choice aggregation programs and maintains business relationships with multiple energy suppliers; and WHEREAS, due to Provider’s expertise and knowledge, Customer engaged Provider as an independent contractor, for the purpose of facilitating the purchase and sale of electricity and other related services on behalf of Customer and for performing certain other duties and services on the terms and conditions set forth in that certain Administrative Services Agreement dated August 5, 2019 (the “Original Agreement”); and WHEREAS, Customer has filed a Notice of Intent to deregister its Community Choice Aggregator Program (BPROUD) with the CPUC, setting forth Customer’s desire to cease its operations as a CCA; and
WHEREAS, due to Provider’s expertise and knowledge, Customer seeks to engage Provider as an independent contractor, for the purpose of facilitating certain aspects of the wind-down of Customer’s operations as a CCA; and
WHEREAS,the Parties desire to amend, restate and supersede the terms of the Original Agreement in its entirety; and
WHEREAS, Provider is willing to perform such duties and services for Customer on the terms and conditions set forth herein for a fee; and
3 NOW, THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement and such other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1

DEFINITIONS

1.1 Definitions.

As used in this Agreement, all capitalized terms shall have the respective meanings given to them in this Agreement and in Exhibit A (Schedule of Definitions).

1.2 Construction.

All references herein to an agreement shall be to this Agreement as amended, supplemented or modified from time to time. All references to a particular entity shall include a reference to such entity’s successors and permitted assigns. The words “herein,” “hereof” and “hereunder” and other words of similar import shall refer to this Agreement as a whole, including all appendices, annexes, exhibits and schedules, and not to any particular section or subsection of this Agreement. Wherever from the context it appears appropriate, each term stated in either the singular or plural shall include the singular and the plural and pronouns stated in the masculine, feminine or neuter gender shall include the masculine, feminine and neuter genders. The words “includes” or “including” shall be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation.” All references to statutes and related regulations shall include any amendments of the same and any successor statutes and regulations. All exhibits and schedules to this Agreement are hereby incorporated herein by reference, including the following:
(i) Exhibit A – Schedule of Definitions
(ii) Exhibit B – Scope of Work
(iii) Exhibit C – Fixed Fee Rate, Reimbursable Expenses and Notice Address
(iv) Exhibit D – Authorization Documents
(v) Exhibit E – Customer Approval Procedures
(vi) Exhibit F – Form of Authorized Officer Approval
(vii) Exhibit G – Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement and Amendments Thereto
ARTICLE 2

ENGAGEMENT OF PROVIDER
4 2.1 Engagement of Provider.

Customer hereby engages Provider as an independent contractor to perform certain services as set forth in Exhibit B in connection with Customer’s wind-down of its CCA program, and to perform certain other duties, all as set forth in this Agreement. In consideration of the fees and cost reimbursements payable to Provider hereunder, Provider accepts such engagement and agrees to perform the Services in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof.

2.2 Relationship.
(a) Provider shall act as an independent contractor of Customer with respect to the performance of its obligations hereunder. Neither Provider nor its Affiliates, employees or Subcontractors (including Provider’s legal counsel) or the employees of any such parties engaged in connection with the Services shall be deemed to be an agent, representative, employee, or servant of Customer. This Agreement is not intended to create, and shall not be construed to create, a relationship of partnership or an association of profit between Customer and Provider. Provider is not admitted to practice law in any jurisdiction, and will not provide legal advice to Customer in connection with the performance of the Services. Provider is not licensed as a provider of accounting services, does not hold any certifications required to be held by those providing accounting services, and will not provide any services that require such licensing and certification. Provider is not licensed as a financial advisor, financial manager, insurance advisor, or insurance broker.
(b) In the unanticipated event that Provider or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Provider providing Services hereunder claims, or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (“PERS”), to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the Customer, Provider shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Customer for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Provider or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of Customer. (c) Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, Provider and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing Services hereunder shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by Customer, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of Customer and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by Customer for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

2.3 Engagement of Third Parties.
5 Provider may, subject to the other provisions of this Agreement, engage such Persons as it deems reasonably necessary and appropriate for the purpose of performing or carrying out any of the Services or its obligations under this Agreement; provided, however, that no such engagement shall relieve Provider of any of its obligations or liabilities under this Agreement, including those set forth in Article 7; and provided further, that, except as provided herein, Provider’s use of such Persons shall not modify or increase the compensation payable to Provider pursuant to Article 5. Except as expressly set forth herein, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create any contractual relationship between any such Person (including Provider’s legal counsel) and Customer.

ARTICLE 3

TERM AND RENEWAL

3.1 Term.
(a) Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 8, the term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue until June 30, 2022 (the “Term”).
6 (b) Unless sooner terminated as set forth in Article 8, at the expiration of theBase Term, the term of this Agreement shall be automatically extended until such time as a Party provides written notice to the other Party that it elects to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Article 8 (such written notice, a “Termination Notice”). Following receipt by such other Party of a Termination Notice, this Agreement shall terminate as set forth in Section 8.4.

ARTICLE 4

DUTIES OF PROVIDER

4.1 Services.

During the Term, Provider shall perform the services identified in the Scope of Work set forth in Exhibit B hereto or as otherwise agreed to by the Parties pursuant to the terms hereof (the “Services”). The Services shall be comprised of those services identified in the Scope of Work Exhibit as “Fixed Fee Services” (collectively, the “Fixed Fee Services”) and those services to be performed on behalf of Customer and identified in the Scope of Work Exhibit as “Reimbursable Services” (collectively, the “Reimbursable Services”).

4.2 General Operating Standards.

Provider shall perform the Services in a good, workmanlike, and commercially reasonable manner in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement and Applicable Laws. For avoidance of doubt, the Parties expressly agree that Customer has secured its own legal counsel pertaining to its dissolution of its CCA and Provider shall have no obligation to monitor and/or notify Customer of any change in laws, regulations or other legal obligations.

Provider shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Services to be planned and performed in a timely and cost-effective manner. Provider shall coordinate with Customer with respect to the requirements relating to applicable provisions of the Authorization Documents that relate to the tasks to be completed by Customer on or before the date requested by Customer.

4.3 Personnel.

Provider’s administration personnel as a group, including any Persons engaged by Provider pursuant to Section 2.3, shall be qualified in administering services related to community choice aggregation programs, possess any certification(s) or license(s) necessary or required by law to perform the service, and experienced in the duties to which they are assigned.

ARTICLE 5

FEES AND COST REIMBURSEMENT
7 5.1 Fixed Fees.
(a) As compensation for performing the Services, Customer shall pay Provider the fees set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
8 5.2 Reimbursable Expenses. During the Term, Customer shall reimburse Provider for the expenses actually incurred by Provider in connection with the performance of the Reimbursable Services described in Paragraph B in the Scope of Work (the “Reimbursable Expenses”) in accordance with Exhibit C.
(a) The Reimbursable Expenses shall be allocated to Customer as follows:
(i) Data management fees will be allocated to Customer on the basis of the Customer’s total number of electric service accounts multiplied by the per account maintenance fee invoiced bythe Data Management service provider. (ii) Fees and costs for Professional Services and Legal Services incurred in performance of the Reimbursable Services for the benefit of Provider’s members generally will be allocated among all Provider members (including Customer) on an equal basis.
(iii) Fees and costs for Professional Services, Legal Services, and Supplemental Procurement Services incurred solely on behalf of Customer will be directly assigned to and payable byCustomer.
(b) The Reimbursable Expenses incurred by Provider shall be invoiced and payable as set forth in Section 5.3.

5.3 Invoicing and Payment Procedures.
(a) Except as required by Section 5.3(c) and (e) below, the Fixed Fee and the Reimbursable Expenses shall be payable for each month not later than thirty (30) days following receipt of a Payment Invoice (each such date, a “Payment Date”) and shall be prorated for any partial monthly period at the beginning and end of the Term, with such prorations based on a thirty (30) day calendar month. Invoiced amounts will be paid by wire transfer of immediately available funds to Provider at an account designated in writing by Provider. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties may agree to a different payment due date for the Supplemental Procurement Services portion of the Reimbursable Expenses.
(b) Provider shall submit invoices to Customer at least ten (10) Business Days prior to the relevant Payment Date for the Fixed Fee and Reimbursable Expenses that are due and payable on such Payment Date. Invoices (“Payment Invoice”) by Provider shall be sent to Customer at the address(es) set out in Exhibit C. (c) Provider may submit invoices to Customer and to the collateral agent for payment from the lockbox account established pursuant to the Security Documents not less than ten (10) Business Days prior to the relevant Payment Date for the Fixed Fee and Reimbursable Expenses that are due and payable on such Payment Date. The terms and conditions for payment of any Payment Invoice to be paid from the lockbox account shall be governed by the Security Documents.
9 (d) Either Party may, in good faith, dispute the correctness of any invoice, bill, charge, or any adjustment to an invoice, rendered under this Agreement, or adjust any invoice for any arithmetic or computational error within twelve (12) months of the date the invoice, bill, charge, or adjustment to an invoice, was rendered. If a Payment Invoice or portion thereof, or any other claim or adjustment arising thereunder, is disputed, payment of the undisputed portion of the Payment Invoice shall be required to be made when due, with written notice of the objection given to the other Party. Any invoice dispute or invoice adjustment shall be in writing and shall state the basis for the dispute or adjustment. Payment of the disputed amount (the “Disputed Payment”) shall not be required until the dispute is resolved. The Parties shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve the Disputed Payment within ten (10) Business Days of receipt of the notice of the Disputed Payment.

Once the Parties agree on a resolved payment amount (the “Resolved Payment Amount ”), Provider shall cause the next monthly Payment Invoice to reflect a credit or charge, as appropriate, based on the resolution of the payment dispute, in the amount of the Resolved Payment Amount. Inthe event the Parties are unable to resolve a payment dispute within ten (10) Business Days, the lesser amount shall be deemed due payable unless and until a different amount is identified following conclusion of the dispute resolution provisions in Article 12, or a court of competent jurisdiction orders otherwise.
(e) The Parties agree that notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Payment Date for the final invoice hereunder shall be no later than May 15, 2022 and such final invoice shall include pre-payment of services to be rendered through June 30, 2022 and shall be paid through the lockbox account established pursuant to the Security Documents.

5.4 Records and Audits.
(a) Except as otherwise required by Applicable Laws, Provider shall keep books and records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles with respect to Services performed for a period of three (3) years after the applicable creation date of such book or record; or any such longer period as may be required by law. (b) Upon no less than seventy-two (72) hours’ notice to Provider, Provider shall make such books and records related to the Services available for inspection and audit by Customer or its designated agents at Customer’s expense during Regular Work Hours and at the office where such books and records are kept; provided that Provider’s company software, books and records not directly related to this Agreement shall not be subject to inspection or audit.
(c) If any such inspection or audit discloses that any error has occurred and that, as a result thereof, any overpayment or any underpayment has occurred, the amount thereof shall promptly be paid with interest at the rate set forth in Section 5.5 to the Party to whom it is owed by the other Party; provided that Provider or Customer, as applicable, shall only be liable for any amounts hereunder that relate to a period within twelve (12) months of the date of the inspection or audit conducted by Customer.

5.5 Past Due Amounts.
10 Any amounts due under this Agreement, if not timely paid by the Party from whom they are due, shall bear interest at the per annum rate equal to the Prime Rate (as published in The Wall Street Journal) plus one and one-half percent (1.5%), prorated on the basis of a 365-day year (or such lower rate as is the maximum rate permitted by Applicable Law) from the date that such amount was due and payable (taking into account any grace period herein provided) until the time that such amount is paid.
11 ARTICLE 6
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES; COVENANTS

6.1 General Representations and Warranties.

Each Party, for itself only, hereby represents and warrants to the other Party hereto, as of the date hereof, that:
(a) It is an entity duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the applicable laws of the jurisdiction in which it was formed. (b) It has the requisite power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder (including with respect to any indemnity obligations hereunder), and the execution, delivery and performance hereof do not and will not contravene any Applicable Law, or any order of any court or Governmental Authority or agency applicable to or binding on it or any of its properties, or contravene the provisions of, or constitute a default under, its organizational documents or any indenture, mortgage, contract or other agreement or instrument to which it is a party or by which it or any of its property is bound or affected.
(c) This Agreement has been duly authorized by all necessary actions on the part of such Party and the execution, delivery and performance by such Party of this Agreement do not require any approval not already obtained by it or any approval or consent not already obtained of any trustee or holders of indebtedness or obligations of such Party. (d) No authorization or approval or other action by, and no notice to or filing with, any Governmental Authority or regulatory body is required for the due execution, delivery or performance by such Party of this Agreement. (e) The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement have been duly authorized by all requisite entity actions.
(f) The person signing this Agreement is authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of, and to bind, the applicable Party. (g) Assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement by the other Parties hereto, this Agreement constitutes its valid and binding obligation, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except to the extent such enforceability is limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium or similar laws affecting or relating to the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and by general equitable principles (regardless of whether such enforcement is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law). (h) Except for the pending deregistration of Customer with the CPUC, there are no pending or, to such Party’s knowledge, threatened actions or proceedings against such Party before any court or administrative agency which would materially adversely affect such Party’s ability to perform its obligations hereunder. 12 6.2 Additional Customer Representations and Warranties. (a) Delegation of Authority and Authorization Documents. Customer has taken and performed all acts necessary, and has received all necessary authorizations, approvals or other actions required by, and has made all necessary filings with, any Governmental Authority that is required for the (i) delegation of authority to Provider as contemplated hereby, (ii) filing with Provider written notice of withdrawal from Provider, and (iii) adoption of a resolution of its governing body approving the withdrawal from the JPA. The Authorization Documents represent a true, complete and accurate list of all such necessary authorizations, approvals, actions and filings and Customer has provided true, complete and accurate copies of the Authorization Documents to Provider as of the Effective Date. Other than the Authorization Documents, there are no other authorizations, approvals, filings or other actions required for Customer to enter into this Agreement, perform its obligations hereunder and delegate authority to Provider to perform the Services. (b) Security Documents and Ancillary Documents. Subject to Provider’s compliance with the Customer Approval Procedures and, in connection with any Energy Contract entered into on behalf of Customer, Provider is authorized to (i) enter into Energy Contracts on behalf of Customer, (ii) grant to the counterparties to any such Energy Contracts a first priority security interest in any amounts received from the Utility, Customer or the end- users in Customer’s territory pursuant to such Energy Contracts (as contemplated in the Security Documents), (iii) arrange for any funds received from the Utility, Customer or such end-users in connection with such Energy Contracts to be deposited into a lockbox account pledged to the counterparties to any such Energy Contract and be paid to any such counterparties in accordance with the terms and conditions of such Energy Contracts and the Security Documents, and (iv) enter into any needed ancillary documentation required in connection with the execution, performance or administration of the Energy Contracts, the Security Documents or in connection with the provision of the Services. (c) Authorized Officer. Customer has designated the Authorized Officer to approve Provider’s execution of Energy Contracts as set forth in and subject to the Customer Approval Procedures, on behalf of Customer, for the purchase of energy and renewable energy and Customer has authorized the Authorized Officer to provide any such approval in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F. Upon receipt of the Authorized Officer’s approval of any Energy Contract or other action, Provider is authorized to enter into such Energy Contract or perform such action on behalf of Customer.
(d) Legal Counsel. Customer has retained its own legal counsel to advise Customer with regard to the deregistration and wind-down of its CCA operations, including, but not limited to, legal, regulatory, and compliance obligations including, but not limited to, the sufficiency of its procurement of Resource Adequacy and Renewable Portfolio Standards energy products.

6.3 Customer Covenants. Customer covenants and agrees as follows:
(a) Authorizing Documents. Customer shall maintain the Authorization Documents in full force and effect throughout the Term and shall immediately inform Provider of any change to the identity of the Authorized Officer hereunder or to the Authorization Documents that may affect the ability of Provider to perform its obligations hereunder. 13 (b) Collateral Agent’s Determinations. In performing the Services hereunder, Provider may rely upon the authorizations and instructions received from the Authorized Officer (if such authorization is required pursuant to the Customer Authorization Procedures) and may rely on the accuracy of the Customer Approval Procedures. Provider shall have no liability to Customer for actions taken in reliance on authorizations or instructions received by the Authorized Officer or in compliance with the Customer Approval Procedures. Until such time as Customer instructs Provider in writing that an individual is no longer an “Authorized Officer” hereunder, Provider shall have no duty to inquire as to the authority of such Authorized Officer to provide the authorizations or instructions in connection with the Services. In the event that Provider is at any time unsure as to the identity of the Authorized Officer hereunder, Provider may request written instructions from Customer as to the course of action to be adopted by Provider and Provider shall be entitled to conclusively rely upon such written instructions without liability to Customer or any other Person. (c) Data Access. If requested by Provider, Customer shall assist Provider in obtaining information regarding Customer’s end-users from the Utility, including the number of end- user customers that form part of Customer’s community choice aggregation program, the energy consumption, load shapes and usage data of such end-users and the proportional share of such end- users in Customer’s territory.
(d) Customer Rates. Customer shall establish and maintain end-user customer rates designed to generate revenues sufficient to satisfy the overall revenue requirement for Customer, including timely payment of all Customer’s obligations under this Agreement, all Energy Contracts and the Security Documents.

6.4 Response Time.
(a) Customer Response Time.
(i) In all circumstances where Provider requests the approval, consent or cooperation of Customer to any action (or inaction) hereunder, Customer shall consider and respond to such request with reasonable promptness as is feasible under the circumstances.
(ii) Provider will exercise commercially reasonable efforts to provide as much advance notice of such request as is reasonable given the prevailing circumstances and the nature of the matters for which a response is requested. (iii) If Provider is prevented from performing its obligations under this Agreement as the result of an unreasonable delay on the part of Customer to provide a required response required pursuant hereto, then Provider’s obligations hereunder shall be excused until such time as Customer provides its required response.
(b) Provider Response Time.
14 (i) With respect to the provision of the Services, Provider shall promptly respond to any request or direction from or on behalf of Customer and to any event that requires action by Provider pursuant to this Agreement within the time frame by which such response is required hereunder. 15 ARTICLE 7

INDEMNIFICATION

7.1 Indemnification by Provider.
(a) Subject to Section 7.1(b), Provider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless each Customer Indemnified Party from and against any and all Claims incurred or asserted against such Customer Indemnified Party arising out of or otherwise in connection with Provider’s gross negligence, bad faith, recklessness or willful misconduct in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder, including any Claims relating to any liability resulting from any violation of or noncompliance with any Applicable Law to be complied with by Provider hereunder. Provider’s obligations under this paragraph shall include all costs (including but not limited to attorneys fees) incurred in performing the same. Customer may employ counsel at its own expense with respect to any claims or demands asserted or sought to be collected against it; provided, if counsel is employed because Provider does not assume control of the defense, Provider will bear the reasonable expenses of Customer’s counsel. (b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, Provider shall not be required to defend, indemnify or hold harmless any Customer Indemnified Party from and against, and no Customer Indemnified Party shall be exculpated from, any Claims to the extent such Claims (i) are caused by or arise from the breach of this Agreement by Customer or the gross negligence, bad faith, recklessness or willful misconduct of such Customer Indemnified Party; (ii) relate to changes to the market rate for electricity, including the fact that, from time to time, negotiated rates under Energy Contracts entered into by Provider on behalf of Customer may be higher than rates charged by the Utility, (iii) relate to defaults under the Energy Contracts that are not caused by Provider’s gross negligence, bad faith, recklessness or willful misconduct, or (iv) are the result of a change in governmental regulation or a change in Applicable Law.

7.2 Indemnification by Customer.
(a) Subject to Section 7.2(b), Customer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless each Provider Indemnified Party from and against any and all Claims incurred or asserted against such Provider Indemnified Party arising out of or otherwise in connection with this Agreement and/or Provider’s entry into any Energy Contract on behalf of Customer or the end-users in Customer’s territory, including any Claims resulting from (i) the failure of Customer (or the end-users in its territory) to make payments with respect to an Energy Contract, (ii) a default by Provider under any Energy Contract entered into pursuant hereto that is the result of an act or omission of Customer. Customer’s obligations under this paragraph shall include all costs (including but not limited to attorneys fees) incurred in performing the same, and/or (iii) Customer’s failure to comply with any legal, regulatory, or compliance obligations, including, but not limited to, failure to procure sufficient Resource Adequacy and/or Renewable Portfolio Standards energy products. Provider may employ counsel at its own expense with respect to any claims or demands asserted or sought to be collected against it; provided, if counsel is employed because Customer does not assume control of the defense, Customer will bear the reasonable expenses of Provider’s counsel. 16 (b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, Customer shall not be required to defend, indemnify or hold harmless any Provider Indemnified Party from and against, and no Provider Indemnified Party shall be exculpated from, any Claims to the extent caused by or arising from the breach of this Agreement by Provider or the gross negligence, bad faith, recklessness or willful misconduct of such Provider Indemnified Party.

7.3 Indemnification Procedure.
(a) After receipt by an Indemnified Party of notice of the commencement of any Claim that is indemnifiable by Provider under Section 7.1 or Customer under Section 7.2 (as applicable, in such capacity, the “Indemnifying Party”), such Indemnified Party shall give prompt written notice to the relevant Indemnifying Party of the commencement thereof. The failure to promptly notify such Indemnifying Party shall not relieve the Indemnifying Party of any liability that it may have to any Indemnified Party with respect to such action; provided that, to the extent that any such failure to provide prompt notice is responsible for an increase in the indemnity obligations of the Indemnifying Party, the Indemnifying Party shall not be responsible for any such increase.
(b) When required to indemnify an Indemnified Party in accordance with this Article 7, the relevant Indemnifying Party shall assume on behalf of such Indemnified Party and conduct with due diligence and in good faith the defense of any Claim against such Indemnified Party, whether or not the Indemnifying Party shall be joined therein, and the Indemnified Party shall cooperate with the Indemnifying Party in such defense. (c) The Indemnifying Party shall have charge and direction of the defense and settlement of such Claim; provided, however, that without relieving the Indemnifying Party of its obligations hereunder or impairing the Indemnifying Party’s right to control the defense or settlement thereof, the Indemnified Party may elect to participate through separate counsel in the defense of any such Claim, but the fees and expenses of such counsel shall be at the expense of such Indemnified Party unless (i) the employment of counsel by such Indemnified Party has been authorized in writing by the Indemnifying Party, (ii) the Indemnified Party shall have reasonably concluded that there exists a material conflict of interest between the Indemnifying Party and such Indemnified Party in the conduct of the defense of such Claim (in which case the Indemnifying Party shall not have the right to control the defense or settlement of such Claim on behalf of such Indemnified Party) or (iii) the Indemnifying Party shall not have employed counsel to assume the defense of such Claim within a reasonable time after notice of the commencement thereof. In each of such cases the reasonable fees and expenses of counsel shall be at the expense of the Indemnifying Party. (d) The Indemnifying Party shall obtain the prior written consent of the Indemnified Party (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed) before entering into a settlement of or ceasing to defend such claim or action if, pursuant to or as a result of such settlement or cessation, injunctive or equitable relief or other non-monetary relief, remedy or arrangement will be imposed against the Indemnified Party or if the Indemnifying Party will not fully pay or satisfy all amounts payable with respect to such proceeding or settlement. In no event shall the Indemnifying Party be required to indemnify an Indemnified Party with respect to amounts paid in settlement of a claim unless such claim was settled with the consent of the Indemnifying Party. 17 7.4 Limitations of Liability.
(a) Total Limitation of Liability. Except for amounts payable as provided in Section 7.1 (Indemnification by Provider) and Section 2.2(b), and except for amounts payable as a result of any reckless, willful or criminal conduct by Provider or its Affiliates or any of their employees, agents, officials, Subcontractors or independent contractors, Provider’s total liability under this Agreement to Customer Indemnified Parties on all Claims of any kind, whether based on contract, indemnity, warranty, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise, for all losses or damages arising out of, connected with, or resulting from this Agreement or from the performance or breach thereof, or from any services covered by or furnished during the Term of this Agreement shall with respect to any fiscal year in no case exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the value of the Fixed Fee payable in such fiscal year.

Similarly, except for amounts payable as provided in Section 7.2 (Indemnification by Customer), Customer’s total liability under this Agreement to Provider Indemnified Parties on all Claims of any kind, whether based on contract, indemnity, warranty, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise, for all losses or damages arising out of, connected with, or resulting from this Agreement or from the performance or breach thereof, or from any services covered by or furnished during the Term of this Agreement shall with respect to any fiscal year in no case exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the value of the Fixed Fee payable in such fiscal year.
(b) No Liability for Energy Contracts. Customer acknowledges that Provider will be entering into Energy Contracts on behalf of Customer and the end-users in Customer’s territory. Customer acknowledges and agrees that neither Provider nor any member of Provider shall be liable for the amount of any shortfall between the payments due to the counterparty under such Energy Contracts and the amount received from such end-users unless such shortfall is the result of the gross negligence, willful misconduct, conversion, misappropriation or theft on the part of Provider.
(c) Waiver of Consequential Damages. Except in connection with indemnification for third-party Claims or Claims resulting from gross negligence or willful misconduct, in no event, whether based on contract, indemnity, warranty, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise, shall a Party or its respective Affiliates be liable for special, incidental, exemplary, indirect or consequential damages.

7.5 Survival.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the provisions of this Article 7 are intended to and shall survive termination of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 8

TERMINATION

8.1 Termination by Customer.
(a) Termination for Cause.
18 (i) Without limiting any other rights or remedies it may have, Customer shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause by delivery of a Termination Notice to Provider in connection with the occurrence of any of the following events:

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 19 (1) Provider fails to make any payment required to be made by Provider to Customer hereunder when such payment is due and owing under this Agreement, and such failure shall continue for ten (10) calendar days after written notice thereof has been given to Provider. (2) Provider has filed against it petitions under any
insolvency or bankruptcy Law of any jurisdiction which are not dismissed within ninety (90) calendar days of the date filed, proposes any dissolution, liquidation, composition, financial reorganization or recapitalization with creditors, makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy under any provision of Applicable Law or consents to the filing of any bankruptcy or reorganization petition against it under any similar law, or if receivers, trustees, custodians or similar agents are appointed or take possession with respect to any property or business of Provider.
(3) Provider fails to comply (other than for Force Majeure reasons) in any material respect with any term, provision or covenant of this Agreement, other than the payment of sums to be paid hereunder, and such failure shall continue for thirty (30) calendar days after written notice thereof has been given to Provider.
(4) Provider assigns this Agreement in violation of the provisions of Section 13.6.
(ii) Notwithstanding the foregoing, Customer shall not have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 8.1(a) if the occurrence of any of the events or conditions described in this Section 8.1(a) is the result of Customer’s bad faith, willful misconduct or gross negligence. (b) Timing of Termination. If Customer delivers a Termination Notice to Provider pursuant to Section 8.1(a) or 8.1(b), this Agreement shall terminate as set forth in Section 8.4.

8.2 Termination by Provider.
(a) Termination for Cause.
(i) Without limiting any other rights or remedies it may have, Provider shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause by delivery of a Termination Notice to Customer in connection with the occurrence of any of the following events:
(1) Customer has failed to make any undisputed payment
required to be made to Provider under this Agreement and such failure is not remedied within ten (10) calendar days after the date on which Customer has received notice of such failure to make such payment.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 20 (2) Customer has filed against it petitions under any insolvency or bankruptcy law of any jurisdiction which are not dismissed within ninety (90) calendar days of the date filed, proposes any dissolution, liquidation, composition, financial reorganization or recapitalization with creditors, makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy under any provision of Applicable Law or consents to the filing of any bankruptcy or reorganization petition against it under any similar law, or if receivers, trustees, custodians or similar agents are appointed or take possession with respect to any property or business of Customer.
(3) Customer fails to establish or maintain end-user customer rates in compliance with Section 6.3(d), as reasonably determined by Provider, and fails to establish such rates within thirty (30) calendar days after written notice thereof has been given to Customer. (4) Customer assigns this Agreement in violation of the provisions of Section 13.6.
(5) Customer fails to comply (other than for Force Majeure reasons) in any other material respect with any term, provision or covenant of this Agreement, other than the payment of sums to be paid hereunder, or as otherwise provided above, and such failure continues for sixty (60) calendar days after written notice thereof has been given to Customer; provided, however, that if such failure cannot reasonably be cured within said sixty (60) day period and Customer has diligently commenced the cure of such failure within said period, then Customer shall have a commercially reasonable additional period of time to cure such default not to exceed an additional ninety
(90) calendar days.
(ii) Provider shall not have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 8.2(a) if the occurrence of any of the events or conditions described in this Section 8.2(a) is the result of Provider’s bad faith, willful misconduct or gross negligence.
(b) Termination for Convenience. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Provider shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement or any part of the Services for convenience, at Provider’s sole discretion with or without cause, by delivery of a Termination Notice to Customer at any time after the expiration of the Base Term; provided that no Termination Notice shall be effective for at least thirty (30) calendar days following Customer’s receipt of the same, or any such longer period as my be indicated in the Termination Notice.
(c) Timing of Termination. If Provider delivers a Termination Notice to Customer pursuant to Section 8.2(a) or 8.2(b), this Agreement shall terminate as set forth in Section 8.4.

8.3 Cooperation Upon Termination.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 21 In connection with any termination of this Agreement in accordance herewith, at the reasonable request of Customer, Provider shall cooperate with Customer to provide for the orderly transition of the performance of the Services to a replacement administrator, including the transfer of documentation and data access, in a manner that shall not prejudice Customer or hamper Customer’s ability to receive the Services and the benefits thereof from a replacement administrator after a smooth and timely transition.

8.4 Effect of Termination; No Prejudice.
(a) Effect of Termination. Subject to Section 8.4(b) below, if Customer or Provider delivers a Termination Notice in accordance with, and as permitted by, this Agreement, then this Agreement shall terminate on the later to occur of (i) thirty (30) calendar days from the date of such Termination Notice and (ii) the date on which all of the Energy Contracts to which Provider is a party on behalf of Customer on the date of such Termination Notice have terminated in accordance with their respective terms. (b) No Prejudice. Termination of this Agreement shall not affect any rights or obligations as between the Parties that may have accrued prior to such termination or that expressly or by implication are intended to survive termination whether resulting from the event giving rise to termination or otherwise. In addition, except as expressly provided for herein, termination of this Agreement for any reason shall be without prejudice to Provider’s right to receive a proportional amount of the Fixed Fees or payment of any outstanding Reimbursable Expenses as of the date of termination. Except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement, remedies are cumulative and the exercise of, or failure to exercise, one or more remedies by a Party shall not limit or preclude the exercise of, or constitute a waiver of, other remedies provided for under this Agreement by such Party. For breach of any provision of this Agreement for which an express remedy or measure of damages is herein provided, (i) such express remedy or measure of damages shall be the sole and exclusive remedy hereunder, (ii) the liability of the Party that has committed such breach shall be limited as set forth in such provision and (iii) the Parties hereby waive all other remedies or damages at law or in equity with respect to such breach. If no remedy or measure of damages is expressly provided herein with respect to a breach of any provision of this Agreement, the liability of the Party that has committed such breach shall be limited to direct actual damages only; provided that this limitation shall not apply to (A) Provider’s obligation with respect to indemnifying and holding harmless each Customer Indemnified Party to the extent of any amount owed to a third party other than a Customer Indemnified Party, if any, or (B) Customer’s obligation with respect to indemnifying and holding harmless each Provider Indemnified Party to the extent of any amount owed to a third party other than an Provider Indemnified Party.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 22 ARTICLE 9

FORCE MAJEURE

9.1 Force Majeure.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, each Party’s obligations under this Agreement shall be suspended by any Force Majeure if and to the extent that such Party is prevented or delayed from performing by reason of the Force Majeure; provided, however, that:
(i) the suspension of performance shall be of no greater scope and of no longer duration than is necessarily caused by the Force Majeure and required by any remedial measures;
(ii) no obligations of any Party that arose before the occurrence of Force Majeure shall be excused as the result of the occurrence; and (iii) each Party shall use commercially reasonable efforts to remedy its inability to perform; provided, further, that no Force Majeure shall excuse any payment obligations of either Provider or Customer otherwise due hereunder. (b) If the performance by a Party of its obligations under this Agreement is affected by any Force Majeure, such Party shall as soon as practicable notify the other Parties of the nature and extent thereof.

ARTICLE 10

NOTICES

10.1 Notices.
(a) All notices and other communications required or permitted by this Agreement or by Applicable Law to be served upon or given to a Party by any other Party shall be deemed duly served, given and received (i) on the date of service if served personally or if sent by facsimile transmission or electronic mail during Regular Work Hours (each with appropriate confirmation of receipt) to the Party to whom notice is to be given, or (ii) on the fourth (4th) day after mailing, if mailed by first class registered or certified mail, postage prepaid or (iii) on the next day if sent by a nationally recognized courier for next day service and so addressed and if there is evidence of acceptance by receipt addressed to the address(es) set forth in Exhibit C.
(b) The Parties, by like notice in writing, may designate, from time to time, another address or office to which notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement.

ARTICLE 11

CONFIDENTIALITY
DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 23 11.1 General Confidential Information.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, without the prior written consent of the other Parties hereto, no Party shall disclose Confidential Information (as defined below) received in connection with the performance of the Services. (b) Each Party that receives any Confidential Information from the disclosing Party shall use the same degree of care that it uses to protect its own confidential information of like nature, but no less than a reasonable degree of care, to maintain in confidence the Confidential Information of the disclosing Party. (c) No Party shall have any obligation under this Section 11.1 with respect to any information that:
(i) at the time of disclosure is in the public domain, or thereafter becomes part of the public domain, in each case through a source other than the receiving Party in violation of this Agreement;
(ii) is subsequently learned by receiving Party from a third party that, to the knowledge of the receiving Party, is not under an obligation to keep such information confidential;
(iii) was known to the receiving Party at the time of disclosure to be without confidentiality restrictions, as can be demonstrated by contemporaneous written evidence;
(iv) is generated independently by the receiving Party without reference to the Confidential Information of the disclosing Party, as can be demonstrated by contemporaneous written evidence, or
(v) is required to be disclosed pursuant to Applicable Law, regulation, subpoena, court order or other legal process or professional requirements, or in connection with the enforcement of the receiving Party’s rights under this Agreement. Prior to any such disclosure, the disclosing Party shall, to the maximum extent possible, provide reasonable notice to the other Party, with adequate time (to be judged based upon the facts and circumstances surrounding the disclosure) for the non-disclosing party to seek court intervention if it should so elect in its sole and absolute discretion. (d) For purposes of this Agreement, “Confidential Information ” shall mean all end-user customer specific information, including energy consumption, and market sensitive data, including non-public wholesale energy pricing disclosed in connection with negotiation or procurement of energy or related products under Energy Contracts in connection with the Services whether or not such information was owned or developed by the disclosing Party, which the receiving Party may obtain knowledge of, through or as a result of the relationship established hereunder with the disclosing Party. (e) Provider shall obtain written approval from Customer in connection with any press release or promotional materials that reference the relationship established through this Agreement and such Parties shall agree on the form and content of such press release.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 24 DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 25 11.2 Limited Disclosure of Confidential Information.

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 11.1, Provider shall be entitled to the extent necessary for the performance of its duties hereunder to allow access to the Confidential Information to such of its employees and consultants who are directly concerned with the carrying out of Provider’s duties under this Agreement, provided that Provider shall inform each of such Persons of the confidential nature of, and Provider’s obligation of confidentiality with respect to, such Confidential Information and such employees and consultants shall agree to keep the Confidential Information confidential in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 12

DISPUTE RESOLUTION

12.1 Negotiations.

The Parties shall attempt in good faith to resolve all disputes promptly by negotiation, as set forth below.
(a) A Party may give another Party written notice of any dispute between such Parties that has not been resolved in the normal course of business. Representatives of such Parties at levels one level above the personnel who have previously been involved in the dispute shall meet at a mutually acceptable time and place within ten (10) Business Days after delivery of such notice, and thereafter as often as they reasonably deem necessary, to exchange relevant information and to attempt to resolve the dispute. (b) If such representatives are unable to resolve, or do not anticipate being able to resolve, the dispute within twenty (20) calendar days after receiving notice of such dispute, either Party may initiate legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction as provided in Section 13.2.
(c) If a Party intends to be accompanied at a meeting by an attorney, the other Party shall be given at least three (3) Business Days’ notice of such intention so that the other Party may also be accompanied by an attorney. All negotiations pursuant to this Section

12.1 are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of the Federal Rules of Evidence and applicable state rules of evidence. Each Party shall bear its own costs for this dispute resolution phase.

12.2 Continued Prosecution of the Work.

In case of any dispute, Provider shall continue to diligently perform its obligations under this Agreement, and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing and subject to Section 5.3(c), Customer shall continue to make payments to Provider for those portions of the Services performed hereunder that are not the subject of dispute in accordance with this Agreement.

ARTICLE 13

MISCELLANEOUS
DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 26 13.1 Execution.

This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the different Parties on separate counterparts, each of which, when so executed and delivered (including by electronic mail), shall be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.

13.2 Governing Law; Venue and Jurisdiction.

THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE

WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WITHOUT REGARD TO ITS CONFLICT OF LAWS RULES.

ANY LITIGATION ARISING HEREUNDER SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE

JURISDICTION OF ANY STATE OR FEDERAL COURT LOCATED IN THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA AND VENUE SHALL BE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OR THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY. ANY OF THE FOREGOING COURTS SHALL HAVE PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER THE PARTIES HERETO.

EACH PARTY WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHTS TO CONTEST SAID JURISDICTION AND

VENUE AND WAIVES ANY RIGHT TO COMMENCE ANY ACTION AGAINST THE OTHER PARTY IN ANY OTHER JURISDICTION.

13.3 Intentionally Omitted.

13.4 Amendments, Supplements, Etc.

Neither this Agreement nor any of the terms hereof may be amended, supplemented, or modified orally, but only by an instrument in writing signed by Provider and by Customer.

13.5 Headings.

The headings of the Articles and Sections of this Agreement have been inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not modify, define or limit any of the terms or provisions hereof.

13.6 Assignment.
(a) Neither Party may assign, pledge or otherwise transfer this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Party.
(b) Any attempted assignment, pledge or other transfer in violation of this Section 13.6 shall be null and void.

13.6 Successors and Assigns.

This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties, and their respective successors and assigns, to the extent that assignment is permitted hereunder.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 27 13.7 Other Customers.

Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent or prohibit Provider from providing the same or similar services to any Person not a Party to this Agreement and from entering into a form of agreement substantially similar to this Agreement with any such Persons; provided that the provision of such services does not adversely affect Provider’s ability to perform its obligations hereunder.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 28 13.8 Waiver.

No provision of this Agreement may be waived except in writing by the waiving Party.

The waiver of any breach of any term or condition hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of any other or subsequent breach, whether of like or different nature.

13.9 Severability.

If any provision of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, unenforceable or void, that provision shall be modified so as to be enforceable and as nearly as possible reflect the original intention of the Parties, it being agreed and understood by the Parties that (i) this Agreement and all the provisions hereof shall be enforceable in accordance with their respective terms to the fullest extent permitted by Applicable Law, and (ii) the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

13.10 Construction.

Every term and provision of this Agreement shall be construed simply according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against any Party.

13.11 Entire Agreement.

This Agreement, including the exhibits and schedules attached hereto, which are hereby incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any Person other than the Parties any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of this Agreement.

13.12 Third-Party Beneficiaries.

This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole benefit of the Parties and each of their permitted successors and assigns and no other person or entity shall be a direct or indirect legal beneficiary of, have any rights under, or have any direct or indirect cause of action or claim in connection with this Agreement.

13.13 Survival.

Section 5.4, Article 7, Article 8, Article 9, and Article 13 shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement and any provision which by its terms or by implication is intended to survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement shall so survive.

13.14 No Rules of Construction Against Drafter.

Each Party acknowledges that it and its attorneys have been given an equal opportunity to negotiate the terms and conditions of this Agreement and that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party or any similar rule operating against the drafter of an agreement shall not be applicable to the construction or interpretation of this Agreement.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 29 DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 30 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized officers of the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.

CALIFORNIA CHOICE ENERGY AUTHORITY
By:

Jason Caudle, Executive Director

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
Enrique Zaldivar, Chief Executive Officer
ATTEST:

Jean M. Ayala, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Robert Tafoya, City Attorney
DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F A-1
33073648v1

EXHIBIT A

SCHEDULE OF DEFINITIONS
The terms defined in this Schedule of Definitions shall include the plural as well as the singular and the singular as well as the plural. Except as otherwise indicated, all the agreements or instruments herein defined shall mean such agreements or instruments as the same may from time to time be supplemented or amended or the terms thereof waived or modified to the extent permitted by, and in accordance with, the terms thereof. When used in the Agreement (as defined below), unless otherwise defined therein, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below:
“Affiliate” of a Person (the “First Person”) shall mean a Person which directly or indirectly Controls, or is Controlled by, or is under common control with, the First Person, and shall also include any limited partnership or limited liability company of which the First Person or Affiliate thereof is the general partner, managing member or manager, as the case may be, and any Subcontractor, agent, representative, employee or authorized personnel of the First Person. “Control” of a Person shall mean the customership, directly or indirectly, of more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting securities of that Person. “Agreement” means this Administrative Services Agreement between Customer and Provider.
“Applicable Law” shall mean all laws, statutes, orders, decrees, injunctions, licenses, permits, approvals, agreements and regulations of any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over the matter in question which are applicable to or which affect Provider’s provision of the Services and/or the subject matters encompassed by this Agreement. “Authorization Documents” shall mean the documents identified and summarized in Exhibit D, and the requirements of any documents in replacement of the foregoing or in addition thereto provided by Customer and added to and summarized in Exhibit D from time to time.
“Authorized Officer” means the officer(s) of Customer designated as an “Authorized Officer” in the Customer Approval Procedures.
“Base Term” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(a). “Bundled Load” means the proposed electric energy consumption of a member of Provider, as set forth in the implementation plan filed for such member pursuant to Code Section 366.2.
“Business Day” shall mean any day except a Saturday, Sunday or other day on which commercial banks in the State of California are authorized by law to close. “Claims” shall mean claims, actions, damages, expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees), fines, penalties, losses or liabilities. “Code” shall have the meaning given thereto in the recitals.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F A-2
33073648v1
“Confidential Information” shall have the meaning given in Section

11.1(d). “CPUC” shall have the meaning given thereto in the recitals.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F A-3
33073648v1
“Customer” shall have the meaning given thereto in the introductory paragraph of the Agreement, and its permitted successors and assigns, if any, under the Agreement. “Customer Approval Procedures” means the approval procedures set forth in Exhibit E hereto. “Customer Indemnified Party” shall mean Customer (including successors and permitted
assigns) and its shareholders, partners, directors, officers, agents and employees. “Disputed Payment” shall have the meaning given thereto in Section 5.3(d). “Effective Date” shall have the meaning given in the introductory paragraph of this Agreement.
“Energy Contract” means an agreement for the purchase of energy, renewable energy or related products, including long-term power purchase agreements and master power purchase and sale agreements and/or confirmation letter thereto, entered into by Provider for the benefit of Customer.
“Fixed Fee” shall have the meaning given thereto in Section 5.1(a). “Fixed Fee Services” shall have the meaning given thereto in Section 4.1.
“Force Majeure” shall mean any event that wholly or partly prevents or delays the performance by the Party affected of any obligation arising under this Agreement, but only if and to the extent such event is not within the reasonable control, directly or indirectly, of and not the fault of the Party affected including (provided that the foregoing requirements are satisfied): condemnation; expropriation; invasion; plague; drought; landslide; storms or wind of sufficient intensity to prevent safe performance of work; tornado; hurricane; tsunami; flood; lightning; earthquake; fire; explosion; epidemic; quarantine; war (declared or undeclared), terrorism or other armed conflict; material physical damage to an energy facility to the extent caused by third parties; strikes and other labor disputes (including collective bargaining disputes and lockouts) involving Subcontractors; riot or similar civil disturbance or commotion; other acts of God; acts of the public enemy; blockade; insurrection, riot or revolution; sabotage or vandalism; embargoes; and actions of a Governmental Authority (excluding the actions of the claiming party). “Force Majeure” shall not include (1) an event that prevents or delays (i) Provider’s or Customer’s compliance with (a) Applicable Laws; and (b) Permits required under Applicable Law in connection with such Party’s performance under this Agreement and (ii) Customer’s indemnity obligations hereunder, (2) labor shortages; (3) labor strikes and other labor disputes (including collective bargaining disputes and lockouts) with regard to work by Provider or a Subcontractor (except if such action is part of a regional or national action); or (4) economic hardship (including lack of money).
“Governmental Authority” shall mean any federal, provincial, state or local government authority, agency, court or other body, officer or public entity, including any zoning authority, building inspector, or health or safety inspector, including the CPUC.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F A-4
33073648v1
“Indemnified Party” shall mean a Provider Indemnified Party or Customer Indemnified Party. “Indemnifying Party” shall have the meaning given thereto in Section 7.3. “JPA” shall mean that certain Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Clean Energy Authority dated August 14, 2012, as the same has been or may be amended from time to time.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F A-5
33073648v1
“Payment Date” shall have the meaning given thereto in Section

5.3. “Payment Invoice” shall have the meaning given thereto in Section 5.3.
“Permit” shall mean any waiver, exemption, variance, franchise, certification, approval, permit, authorization, license, consent, or similar order of or from any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over the matter in question.
“Person” shall mean any individual, partnership, joint stock company, corporation, trust, unincorporated association or joint venture, a government or any department or agency thereof, or any other entity.
“Provider” shall have the meaning given thereto in the introductory paragraph of this Agreement, and its successors and permitted assigns, if any. “Provider Indemnified Party” shall mean Provider and its Affiliates and their respective shareholders, partners, directors, officers, agents, employees and representatives. “Regular Work Hours” means 8:00 am (PT) to 5:00 pm (PT) on a Business Day. “Reimbursable Expenses” shall have the meaning set forth in Section

5.2. “Reimbursable Services” shall have the meaning given thereto in Section 4.1. “Scope of Work Exhibit” means Exhibit B hereto. “Security Documents” means, with respect to each Energy Contract, the security documents entered into by Customer in connection therewith pursuant to which Customer grants to the energy suppliers under each Energy Contract (or its collateral agent) a security interest in any and all monies received from the Utility or the end-users in Customer’s territory in connection with such Energy Contract, which security documents shall include (i) an account control agreement for an account (sometimes referred to as a “lockbox account”) among Customer, an account bank and the energy supplier to such Energy Contract (or its collateral agent), (ii) an intercreditor and collateral agency agreement, among Customer, the counterparties to such Energy Contracts and, if applicable, the collateral agent, and (iii) a security agreement between Customer and the counterparty to such Energy Contract (or its collateral agent).
“Services” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.1 and shall be comprised of the Fixed Fee Services and the Reimbursable Services.
“Subcontractors” means any subcontractor, of any tier, vendor or supplier of materials, equipment or services to Provider or any subcontractor, of any tier, of any Person engaged or employed by Provider or any subcontractor of any tier that provides any part of the Services. “Supplemental Procurement Services” has the meaning set forth in Exhibit B. “Term” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(a).

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F A-6
33073648v1
“Termination Notice” shall have the meaning given thereto in Section 3.1(b). “Utility” means Southern California Edison.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F A-7
33073648v1
Exhibit B, Attachment A
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE AND SCHEDULE OF SERVICES

1. Settlement Quality Meter Data Services (SQMD) – Necessary to comply with CAISO requirements. The last submission for load served on 2/28/2022 is due 5/11/2022.

Consultant shall submit daily SQMD files to BPROUD’s Scheduling Coordinator or BPROUD directly for final submission to the CAISO.

2. Billing and Accounting Functions
a. Consultant will continue to process, validate, and manage usage, invoice, billing, payment, and accounting functions key to ensuring BPROUD can collect all the revenue it is due and BPROUD customer balances are accurately settled.
b. These services shall end when SCE stops sending EDI transactions for processing, expected around 5/31/2022.
c. For the avoidance of doubt, support for the California Arrearage Payment Program (CAPP) and the Arrearage Management Plan (AMP) is not included in these services.

3. Transition of Customers back to SCE
a. Consultant shall support the orderly transition of BPROUD’s customers back to SCE.

4. Ongoing access to Calpine’s System
a. In order to support ongoing billing and customer service functions, including looking up customer bills, answering billing inquiries, and supporting a smooth transition of customers back to SCE, the Consultant shall make available its CRM for BPROUD to access until the termination date of this agreement.

5. Transfer of BPROUD Data
a. If requested, Consultant shall deliver to BPROUD all BPROUD data in a mutually agreed to format at the expiration of Participant/Administrative Services Agreement with California Choice Energy Authority, in an industry- standard format and under a mutually agreed-upon timeline.

6. Call Center
a. Consultant shall continue to operate the call center through 3/31/2022, at which point it will be transitioned to a voicemail managed by BPROUD staff.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F A-8
33073648v1
EXHIBIT “B”
BUDGET
The following budget covers services from the start of the post-petition period through the end of June, 2022 when services will be fully sunset:

Month Fees
Feb-22 $18,981
Mar-22 $18,981
Apr-22 $15,000
May-22 $10,000
Total $62,962
For any work provided after May 31st, Consultant will charge a minimum fee of $10,000 per month.

B-9
33073648v1

EXHIBIT B

SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. Fixed Fee Services (through June 2022 unless otherwise noted)

1. Scheduling Coordination
(a) Coordination of CAISO Settlements

2. Account Services
(a) Monthly Lockbox Reconciliations through March 2022 (Bayshore) (b) Review and Validate Invoices from Schedule Coordinator (PEA) (c) Monthly UUT Return through March 2022 (Maher)
(d) Collections on Returns Receivables through March 2022 (Maher) (e) Quarterly Electric Energy Surcharge Return through March 2022 (Maher) (f) Monthly Transactions Accounting through March 2022 (Bayshore) (g) Daily Deposit Tracking and Reporting to Calpine through March 2022 (Bayshore)
(h) Cross-training of BP Finance Staff through March 2022 (Bayshore) (i) Data Management Services through May (Calpine; scope attached)

3. Administration and Management of CCA Program
(a) Power Procurement (possible excess Renewable Energy Certificate sales)
(b) WREGIS Account Management (including the acceptance, retirement, and potential transfer of Renewable Energy Certificates) (c) Power Supply Settlement and Invoice Validation
(d) Historical Hourly Load Date Submission for RA (if still required by the CEC and CPUC)
(e) Provide Financial and Operations Reports
(f) Coordinate with Calpine and SCE on Billing Issues through March 2022 (Bayshore)
(g) Direct Distribution of Funds from Lockbox through March 2022 (Bayshore)
(h) Transition of Lockbox to Non-Secured Account

4. Regulatory Representation and Compliance Filings
B-
1033073648v1
(a) Monthly EIA Submissions
(b) Annual EIA Submission
(c) QFER Submissions
(d) RPS PCIA Data Requests
(e) RA PCIA Data Requests
(f) IRP Monthly Procurement Status Reports (if still required by the CPUC) (g) CARB Annual Retail Sales Reporting

5. Not Included in Scope of Services
(a) JRC Updates (CPUC has indicated this is not required) (b) Annual Power Source Disclosure Program Report
(c) Annual Power Content Mailer
(d) Preparation of Council Staff Report for approval of Power Source Disclosure Program Report and Power Content Label
(e) Biennial IRP Update (if still required by the CPUC) (f) Year End Activity
(g) Tracking and coordination of AMP payment plans with SCE B-
1133073648v1

EXHIBIT C

FIXED FEE RATE, REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES

AND NOTICE ADDRESS

1. Fixed Fee Rate: For Services Performed the month of:

March 2022 - $ 13,562.00
April 2022 - $ 8,950.00
May 2022 - $ 4,610.00
June 2022 - $ 4,610.00

2. Reimbursable Expenses:
(a) Calpine: For Services Performed the month of:

March 2022 - $ 18,981.00
April 2022 - $ 15,000.00
May 2022 - $ 10,000.00

3. Pacific Energy Advisors: For Services Performed the month of:

March 2022 - $ 16,000.00
April 2022 - $ 10,560.00
May 2022 - $ 5,440.00
June 2022 - $ 5,440.00

4. Bayshore Consulting Group: For Services Performed the month of:

March 2022 - $ 2,592.50

5. Maher Accountancy: For Services Performed the month of:

March 2022 - $ 2,500.00

6. Extra Work as Requested:
(a) CalChoice $60 - $150 per hour
(b) Bayshore $60 - $150 per hour
(c) PEA $250 - $300 per hour

7. Legal Services (as incurred): $ 10,000 not to exceed

8. Address for Notices:

B-
1233073648v1
Provider: California Choice Energy
Authority 44933 Fern Avenue
Lancaster, California
93534 Attn: Cathy
DeFalco
Tel: 888.639.2411
Email: [email protected]
With a copy to Provider’s legal
counsel: Stradling Yocca Carlson &
Routh
Attn: Allison Burns
Tel: 949.725.4187
Email: [email protected]
Customer: City of Baldwin Park
Attn: Enrique Zaldivar
Tel: 626.813.5204
Email: [email protected]
C-1
33073648v1

EXHIBIT C

FIXED FEE RATE, REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES

AND NOTICE ADDRESS

9. Address for Notices:

Provider: California Choice Energy
Authority 44933 Fern Avenue
Lancaster, California
93534 Attn: Cathy
DeFalco
Tel: 888.639.2411
Email: [email protected]
With a copy to Provider’s legal
counsel: Hall Energy Law PC
Attn: Stephen Hall
Tel: 503.477.9354
Email: [email protected]
And
Allison Burns, City Attorney
Stradling Yocca Carlson &Rauth
660 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1600
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Email: [email protected]
Tel: (949) 725-4000
Customer: City of Baldwin Park
Attn:Shannon Yauchzee Enrique C. Zaldivar, P.E.Tel:
626.813.5204
Email: [email protected]
[email protected]
D-1
33073648v1

EXHIBIT D

AUTHORIZATION DOCUMENTS
[City’s Resolution to Withdraw from CalChoice]
DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F E-1
33073648v1

EXHIBIT E

CUSTOMER APPROVAL PROCEDURES

1. Authorized Officer
[Table to be completed with name, title of Customer’s officer that is authorized to provide Provider with necessary approvals.]
Nam
e
Title
Chief Executive Officer
Additional Authorized Title
DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 33073648v1

EXHIBIT F

FORM OF AUTHORIZED OFFICER APPROVAL
Prior to any procurement, CalChoice, or CalChoice representative will communicate the details of the proposed procurement via email. An Authorized Officer, as identified in Exhibit E, will give written approval of the procurement via email.

DocuSign Envelope ID: CB7F0FBE-E5EB-463D-A038-C123A1E3629F 33073648v1
F-1
4 EXHIBIT G

JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS

AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENTS

THERETO
5 G-1

STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO. ________15_______
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Sam Gutierrez, Director of Public Works
DATE: March 16, 2022
SUBJECT: Introduction of Ordinance entitled: “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park Amending Chapter 73 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code Relating to Speed Limits on Certain Streets”

SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to request that the City Council consider an ordinance which would adopt speed limits on city streets that are recommended in the 2021 Engineering and Speed Survey Study by amending Chapter 73 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce for first reading, by title only, Ordinance entitled, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park, California amending Chapter 73 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code relating to speed limits on certain streets”.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact with the adoption of Ordinance.

BACKGROUND
Posted speed limits on city streets are regulated by the California Vehicle Code and other State requirements. California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide those local entities may declare apparent speed limits of more than 25 miles per hour on City streets. To be responsive and have speed limits that are appropriate and legally defensible, the State requires a study, also referred to as a “speed survey”, be conducted every five years consistent with Vehicle Code Section 627. The prior study was completed and adopted in 2016 and therefore a new study must now be considered.

In May 2021, a Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey was completed by Infrastructure Engineers which included collection of data and analysis of 58 roadway segments. This latest study was initiated in anticipation of the expiration of the previous study. The new study’s results are herein summarized.

The latest study considers actual vehicle counts and speeds for each roadway segment and recommends changes to speed limits. If the study is approved, the City may post and enforce the speed limits.

DISCUSSION
The study’s data collection, analysis and recommendations are based on standardized traffic engineering practice and must follow the guidelines set by Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). In general, the speed survey measures and documents the traffic speed at each segment. A speed limit change is considered if the 85 th percentile of the measured speeds is different from the posted or prior approved speed limit.

Minor differences may be explained and can be disregarded, but usually a difference of 5 miles per hour or greater is carefully evaluated against historical limits at that location, and against current land use, adjacent segment speed limits, street geometry, and accident history. Considerations to establish speed limits include:
 Continuity of street segments
 School safety
 Pedestrian Crossings
 Street Geometry
 Street Classification
 Number of collisions
Also considered was the City’s traffic safety master plan which helped identify changes in roadway characteristics and surrounding land uses. If an unsafe condition was identified, changes in traffic controls would be considered.

The speed survey recommendations are summarized on Attachment “2” and essentially validate the changes for the posted speed limits citywide.

On February 2, 2022, City Council directed staff to perform a speed survey for seven segments where speed limits were being proposed to increase. These segments are near or around school zones. The initial speed survey was conducted at the peak of the pandemic lockdown in May 2021. The new speed survey for these segments were conducted and validated no changes to the existing speed limits.

The speed survey revealed that out of 58 roadways studied, 56 have adequate speed limits, therefore, no changes in speed limit were recommended. Two (2) locations were recommended for speed limit modifications as follows:

Location Limit Change Speed Limit (MPH)
Pacific Avenue Ramona Boulevard to Big Dalton Avenue Decrease From 40 to 35 Pacific Avenue Big Dalton Avenue to South City Limit Decrease From 40 to 35 The adoption of the study’s recommendations would allow for proper police enforcement activities to be upheld in court. Without a current speed survey speeding tickets could be overturned in court.

LEGAL REVIEW
This report has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and content.

ALTERNATIVE
The City Council could choose not to adopt this ordinance which would result in speed limits not being changed to reflect the recommendations of the Engineering and Traffic Survey and Study. Not changing the speed limits to reflect the recommendations of the Engineering and Traffic Survey and Study would preclude the use of radar by Police in enforcing those speed limits.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Ordinance

2. Speed Survey Summary Table

3. Existing / Proposed Conditions Map

4. Speed Survey Report (Revised)
ORDINANCE NO. 1467

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BALDWIN PARK AMENDING CHAPTER 73 OF THE BALDWIN PARK MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO

SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park desires to maintain the highest level of traffic safety on city streets; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits of more than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously authorized the establishment of Chapter 73 of the Baldwin Park Municipal Code to establish and therefore enable the legal enforcement of speed limits on city streets; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, from time to time as set forth by the rules and regulations of the State, re-established or revises the speed limits as may be necessary for the safe movement of vehicles and pedestrians based upon an Engineering and Traffic Survey.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Baldwin Park does hereby ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Baldwin Park finds and declares that an Engineering and Traffic Survey and Study has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code.

SECTION 2. The Baldwin Park Municipal Code, Chapter 73, is hereby amended by replacing Schedule II - Speed Limits - in its entirety, with the Schedule shown in Exhibit “A” based upon the findings and recommendations of the Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted by the City.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall have it published in accordance with the provisions of state law.

SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days from and after its final adoption.

APPROVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED this ___ day of ________ , 2022.

EMMANUEL J. ESTRADA
MAYOR
ATTEST:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
I, Marlen Garcia, Deputy City Clerk, of the City of Baldwin Park, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. XXXX was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held February 2, 2022 and was adopted by the City Council at its regular meeting held on , 2022 by the following vote of the Council:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT:

COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

MARLEN GARCIA, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Exhibit “A”

SCHEDULE II
No.

Limits
From To Speed
Badillo St. 1 Ramona Blvd. East City Limit 40
Baldwin Park
Blvd. 2 Live Oak Ave. Olive St. 40
3 Olive St. Los Angeles St. 40
4 Los Angeles St. Ramona Blvd. 40
5 Ramona Blv. Merced Ave. 40
6 Merced Ave. Francisquito Ave. 40
7 Francisquito Ave. I-10 40
8 I-10 South City Limit 40
Bess 9 I-10 Baldwin Park Blvd. 30
10 Syracuse Ave. Frazier St. 25
Big Dalton 11 Pacific Ave. I-10 25
Center St. 12 Olive St. Los Angeles St. 30
13 Los Angeles St. Ramona Pkwy 30
Commerce Dr. 14 Rivergrade Rd. Live Oak Ave. 40
Francisquito
Ave. 15 Ramona Blvd. Frazier St. 35
16 Frazier St. Baldwin Park Blvd. 35
17 Baldwin Park Blvd. South City Limit 35
Frazier 18 Bess Ave. Francisquito Ave. 35
Harlan Ave. 19 Los Angeles St. Ramona Blvd. 25
Live Oak Ave. 20 Rivergrade Rd. Baldwin Park Blvd. 45
Los Angeles St. 21 West City Limit Center St. 40
22 Center St. Maine Ave. 40
23 Maine Ave. East City Limit 40
Maine Ave 24 Arrow Hwy Olive St. 35
25 Olive St. Los Angeles St. 35
26 Los Angeles St. Ramona Blvd. 35
27 Pacific Ave. Merced Ave. 35
28 Merced Ave. Francisquito Ave. 35
Merced Ave. 29 Olive St. Los Angeles St. 35
30 Los Angeles St. Ramona Blvd. 35
31 Ramona Blvd. Baldwin Park Blvd. 35
32 Baldwin Park Blvd. Vineland Ave. 35
Merced Ave. 33 Vineland Ave. Puente Ave. 35
Olive St. 34 West City Limit Baldwin Park Blvd. 30
35 Baldwin Park Blvd. East City Limit 30
Pacific Ave. 36 Ramona Blvd. Big Dalton Ave. 35
37 Big Dalton Ave. South City Limit 35
Puente Ave. 38 South City Limit Merced Ave. 40
39 Merced Ave. Root St. 40
40 Root St. Ramona Blvd. 30
Ramona Blvd. 41 I-605 Francisquito Ave. 40
42 Francisquito Ave. Merced Ave. 40
43 Merced Ave. Baldwin Park Blvd. 40
44 Baldwin Park Blvd. Badillo St. 35
45 Badillo St. East City Limit 35
Rivergrade Rd. 46 Brooks Dr. Live Oak Ave. 45
Root St. 47 Puente St. East City Limit 40
Stewart Ave. 48 Live Oak Ave. Olive St. 30
49 Olive St. Los Angeles St. 30
50 Los Angeles St. Ramona Blvd. 30
Syracuse Ave. 51 Bess Ave. Ramona Blvd. 30
Vineland Ave. 52 South City Limit Merced Ave. 30
53 Merced Ave. Pacific Ave. 30
54 Pacific Ave. Badillo St. 30
City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 15
Table 3: Speed Survey Summary

No.

Street

Segment

Length
in
Miles

ADT

85th
Percentile
(mph)

Posted
Speed
Limit

Recom'd
Speed
Limit

Result
1 Badillo St Ramona Blvd to East City Limit 0.56 14,588 45 40 40 JUSTIFIED 2 Baldwin Park Blvd Live Oak Ave to Olive St 0.50 7,907 46 40 40 JUSTIFIED 3 Baldwin Park Blvd Olive St to Los Angeles St 0.48 11,670 43 40 40 NO CHANGE 4 Baldwin Park Blvd Los Angeles St to Ramona Blvd 0.43 12,844 41 40 40 NO CHANGE 5 Baldwin Park Blvd Ramona Blvd to Merced Ave 0.55 14,529 41 40 40 NO CHANGE 6 Baldwin Park Blvd Merced Ave to Francisquito Ave 0.66 17,775 44 40 40 JUSTIFIED 7 Baldwin Park Blvd Francisquito Ave to I-10 0.34 21,948 38 40 40 NO CHANGE 8 Baldwin Park Blvd I-10 to South City Limit 0.36 25,696 37 40 40 NO CHANGE 9 Bess Ave I-10 to Baldwin Park Blvd 0.32 7,337 31 30 30 NO CHANGE 10 Bess Ave Syracuse Ave to Frazier St 0.48 3,411 30 25 25 JUSTIFIED 11 Big Dalton Ave Pacific Ave to I-10 1.00 3,361 39 25 25 JUSTIFIED 12 Center St Olive St to Los Angeles St 0.48 1,769 34 30 30 JUSTIFIED 13 Center St Los Angeles St to Ramona Blvd 0.65 923 33 30 30 NO CHANGE 14 Commerce Dr Rivergrade Rd to Live Oak Ave 0.61 1,545 37 40 40 NO CHANGE 15 Francisquito Ave Ramona Blvd to Frazier St 0.48 10,683 41 35 35 JUSTIFIED 16 Francisquito Ave Frazier St to Baldwin Park Blvd 0.34 14,339 40 35 35 JUSTIFIED 17 Francisquito Ave Baldwin Park Blvd to South City Limit 0.53 26,371 34 35 35 NO CHANGE 18 Frazier St Bess Ave to Francisquito Ave 0.71 5,500 38 35 35 NO CHANGE 19 Harlan Ave Los Angeles St to Ramona Blvd 0.72 3,510 37 25 25 JUSTIFIED 20 Live Oak Ave Rivergrade Rd to Baldwin Park Blvd 0.55 28,483 43 45 45 NO CHANGE 21 Los Angeles St West City Limit to Center St 0.36 19,604 43 40 40 NO CHANGE 22 Los Angeles St Center St to Maine Ave 1.00 14,269 39 40 40 NO CHANGE 23 Los Angeles St Maine Ave to East City Limit 0.39 9,066 41 40 40 NO CHANGE 24 Maine Ave Arrow Hwy to Olive St 0.49 7,966 38 35 35 NO CHANGE 25 Maine Ave Olive St to Los Angeles St 0.49 11,302 33 35 35 NO CHANGE 26 Maine Ave Los Angeles St to Ramona Blvd 0.36 14,824 32 35 35 NO CHANGE 27 Maine Ave Pacific Ave to Merced Ave 0.73 3,564 38 35 35 NO CHANGE 28 Maine Ave Merced Ave to Francisquito Ave 0.68 5,663 37 35 35 NO CHANGE 29 Merced Ave Olive St to Los Angeles St 0.50 3,822 37 35 35 NO CHANGE 30 Merced Ave Los Angeles St to Ramona Blvd 0.60 7,133 37 35 35 NO CHANGE 31 Merced Ave Ramona Blvd to Baldwin Park Blvd 0.36 8,452 38 35 35 NO CHANGE 32 Merced Ave Baldwin Park Blvd to Vineland Ave 0.36 13,176 35 35 35 NO CHANGE 33 Merced Ave Vineland Ave to Puente Ave 0.34 12,216 36 35 35 NO CHANGE 34 Olive St West City Limit to Baldwin Park Blvd 0.73 4,147 36 30 30 JUSTIFIED 35 Olive St Baldwin Park Blvd to East City Limit 1.23 6,864 34 30 30 JUSTIFIED City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 16
Table 3: Speed Survey Summary (Continued)

No.

Street

Segment

Length
in
Miles

ADT

85th
Percentile
(mph)

Posted
Speed
Limit

Recom'd
Speed
Limit

Result
36 Pacific Ave Ramona Blvd to Big Dalton Ave 0.43 17,905 37 40 35 DECREASED 37 Pacific Ave Big Dalton Ave to South City Limit 0.36 18,588 36 40 35 DECREASED 38 Puente Ave South City Limit to Merced Ave 0.76 25,191 43 40 40 NO CHANGE 39 Puente Ave Merced Ave to Root St 0.87 12,031 42 40 40 NO CHANGE 40 Puente Ave Root St to Ramona Blvd 0.51 4,815 35 30 30 JUSTIFIED 41 Ramona Blvd I-605 to Francisquito Ave 0.70 27,738 40 40 40 NO CHANGE 42 Ramona Blvd Francisquito Ave to Merced Ave 0.96 20,438 43 40 40 NO CHANGE 43 Ramona Blvd Merced Ave to Baldwin Park Blvd 0.45 24,456 39 40 40 NO CHANGE 44 Ramona Blvd Baldwin Park Blvd to Badillo St 0.56 19,038 33 35 35 NO CHANGE 45 Ramona Blvd Badillo St to East City Limit 0.42 5,576 42 35 35 JUSTIFIED 46 Rivergrade Rd Brooks Dr to Live Oak Ave 0.74 10,542 51 45 45 JUSTIFIED 47 Root St Puente St to East City Limit 0.33 6,146 41 40 40 NO CHANGE 48 Stewart Ave Live Oak Ave to Olive St 0.48 3,971 37 30 30 JUSTIFIED 49 Stewart Ave Olive St to Los Angeles St 0.48 2,254 34 30 30 JUSTIFIED 50 Stewart Ave Los Angeles St to Ramona Blvd 0.52 2,255 33 30 30 NO CHANGE 51 Syracuse Ave Bess Ave to Ramona Blvd 0.49 3,745 35 30 30 JUSTIFIED 52 Vineland Ave South City Limit to Merced Ave 0.91 6,287 34 30 30 JUSTIFIED 53 Vineland Ave Merced Ave to Pacific Ave 0.67 4,609 37 30 30 JUSTIFIED 54 Vineland Ave Pacific Ave to Badillo St 0.41 3,524 36 30 30 JUSTIFIED 55 Bogart Ave Pacific Ave to Ramona Blvd 0.20 1,202 31 NP 25 JUSTIFIED 56 Downing Ave Pacific Ave to Ramona Blvd 0.25 1,571 34 NP 25 JUSTIFIED 57 Frazier St/Dalewood St Judith St to Baldwin Park Blvd 0.51 5,983 32 NP 25 JUSTIFIED 58 Garvey Ave Syracuse Ave to Tracy St 1.16 2,380 31 NP 25 JUSTIFIED General Calming Measures
Reducing the 85 th percentile speed may be accomplished by implementing calming measures that reduce the speed of the motorists. There are a wide variety of calming measures that can be implemented on a segment to reduce the 85 th percentile speed. Some examples of calming measures are curb extensions, chicanes, roundabouts, traffic circles, raised median, diverters, radar speed feedback signs, and speed humps. However, it should be noted that a calming measure may only be recommended and placed after a thorough investigation of the current geometric conditions and analyzing the level of service (LOS) of each segment by the engineer.

As a result, a separate study must be implemented for each segment to warrant a specific calming measure to be placed.

2 DATE:02/23/22
INFRASTRUCTUREENGINEERS3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250Brea, CA 92821Tel: (714) 940-0100Fax: (714) 940-0700www.infrastructure-engineers.comAPENDIX "D"EXISTING RADAR SPEED ZONE MAPDESIGNED BY:S.MOUSAVI 1 INFRASTRUCTUREENGINEERS
LIVE OAK AVE.IRWINDALE HWY
OLIVE ST.

LOS ANGELES ST.

RAMONA BLVD. RAMONA BLVD.SYRACUSE AVE.

PUENTE AVE.BIG DALTON AVE.VINELAND AVE.

FRAZIER ST.

BALDWIN PARK BLVD.

MAINE AVE.

FRANCISQITO AVE.

BALDWIN PARK BLVD.

STEWART AVE.

CENTER ST.BADILLO ST.PUENTE AVE.

HARLAN ST.

GARVEY AVE.

MERCED AVE.

AZUSA CANYON RD.

MAINE AVE.LEGEND:

ROOT ST.

DALWOOD ST.

BESS AVE
PACIFIC AVE.

RIVERGRADERD.COMMERCE DR.

BOGART AVE.DOWNEY AVE.
2 DATE:02/24/22
INFRASTRUCTUREENGINEERS3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250Brea, CA 92821Tel: (714) 940-0100Fax: (714) 940-0700www.infrastructure-engineers.comAPENDIX "D"PROPOSED RADAR SPEED ZONE MAPDESIGNED BY:S.MOUSAVI 2 INFRASTRUCTUREENGINEERS
LIVE OAK AVE.IRWINDALE HWY
OLIVE ST.

LOS ANGELES ST.

RAMONA BLVD. RAMONA BLVD.SYRACUSE AVE.

PUENTE AVE.BIG DALTON AVE.VINELAND AVE.

FRAZIER ST.

BALDWIN PARK BLVD.

MAINE AVE.

FRANCISQITO AVE.

BALDWIN PARK BLVD.

STEWART AVE.

CENTER ST.BADILLO ST.PUENTE AVE.

HARLAN ST.

GARVEY AVE.

MERCED AVE.

AZUSA CANYON RD.

MAINE AVE.LEGEND:

ROOT ST.

DALWOOD ST.

BESS AVE
PACIFIC AVE.

RIVERGRADERD.COMMERCE DR.

BOGART AVE.DOWNEY AVE.
3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250
Brea, CA 92821
Tel.: (714) 940-0100
Fax: (714) 940-0700
www.infrastructure-engineers.com

March 1st, 2022

Mr. Sam Gutierrez
Director of Public Works
City of Baldwin Park
14403 Pacific Avenue
Baldwin Park, CA 91706

Subject: Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study

Dear Mr. Gutierrez
Infrastructure Engineers (IE) is pleased to provide this citywide speed zone survey and speed limit study pursuant to a request from the City of Baldwin Park. This report documents the findings of our investigation.

Should you have any questions or comment s, please do not hesitate to contact Shawn Mousavi at (714) 940-0100, ext. 5226, [email protected] or you may contact me by phone at (714) 940- 0100, or email at [email protected]
Sincerely,
Infrastructure Engineers

Amir Farahani, P.E, T.E.

Principal Traffic Engineer

Attachments: Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study

CITYWIDE SPEED ZONE SURVEY AND SPEED LIMIT STUDY
(ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY)

PREPARED FOR:

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK

PREPARED BY:

3060 Saturn Street, Suite 250
Brea, California 92821
(714) 940-0100

Under the Supervision of
Amir Farahani, P.E., T.E.

Principal Traffic Engineer

Project No. 1020.105

Date: March 1st, 2022

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Certification ............................................................................................................................ ii Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 1 Engineering and Traffic Survey ............................................................................................ 2 Maximum Speed Limit .......................................................................................................... 3 Prima Facie Speed Limits (CVC 22352) .............................................................................. 3 Intermediate Speed Zones ................................................................................................... 4 Speed Zoning Procedures .................................................................................................... 4 Definitions ............................................................................................................................. 8 Local Street Exceptions (CVC 40802) .................................................................................. 8 Other Considerations ............................................................................................................ 8 CVC 22358.3 ........................................................................................................................ 9 Speed Survey Data - Procedures Used for the Speed Survey Program ............................. 9 Roadway Conditions ........................................................................................................... 10 Speed Limit Posting ............................................................................................................ 10 Collision Data ...................................................................................................................... 11 Procedures Used for Collision Data Collection .................................................................. 11 Procedures Used for Collision Rate ................................................................................... 11 Table 1: Statewide Travel and Collision Rates for California State Highways .................. 11 Table 2: Collision Data Summary ....................................................................................... 12 Table 2: Collision Data Summary (Continued) ................................................................... 13 Survey Results and Recommendation ............................................................................... 14 Table 3: Speed Survey Summary ....................................................................................... 15 Table 3: Speed Survey Summary (Continued) .................................................................. 16 General Calming Measures ................................................................................................ 16 Table 4: Survey Supports Current Posted Speed Limit – No Change ............................... 17 Table 4: Survey Supports Current Posted Speed Limit – No Change (Continued) ........... 18 Table 5: Survey Speeds Differ from Posted Speed, Limit Can be Justified....................... 19 Table 5: Survey Speeds Differ from Posted Speed, Limit Can be Justified (Continued) .. 20 Table 6: Survey Speeds Differ from Posted Speed, Limit Must be Decreased ................. 21 Appendix “A” Spot Speed Survey Data Sheets and Average Daily Traffic Counts ............. A Appendix “B” Engineering and Traffic Survey Sheets .......................................................... B Appendix “C” Collision Data ................................................................................................. C Appendix “D” Existing and Proposed Radar Speed Zone Map............................................ D City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

ii
Certification

I, Amir Farahani, do hereby certify that this citywide speed zone survey and speed limit study was performed under my supervision for the City of Baldwin Park and is accurate and complete. I certify that I am both experienced in performing studies of this type and duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Civil and Traffic Engineer.

_________________________
Amir Farahani, P.E., T.E.

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 1
Summary
This report documents the results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted to update the speed limits of certain streets within the City of Baldwin Park arterial , collector, and residential street network. The study will provide recommendations to verify, increase , or decrease posted speed limits within existing city boundaries based on the data and the survey results.

A total of 58 survey locations were selected , and spot speed surveys wer e conducted by City Traffic Counters (CTC) at 58 locations in conformance with State law for establishing speed limits.

The majority of the 58 segments have the necessary justifications to support current posted speed limits as previously adopted and poste d. All segments were reviewed in detail including traffic volumes, collision history, adjacent land uses, roadway characteristics and field observations.

Background
Statutes within the California Vehicle Code (CVC) require that governmental agencies periodically review and update their posted speed limits. These periodic updates are required for the City’s enforcement agency to enforce speed limits with radar. The process involves the review of existing posted speed limits for adequacy in terms of adjacent land use, traffic demands, roadway conditions, continuity of speed limits, collisions, and field surveys of motorist driving patterns (speed survey).

The Baldwin Park Police Department performs the City of Baldwin Park’s enforcement of speed limits on City roadways. The enforcement of speed limits and response to speed ‐related issues is primarily using radar. Speed enforcement involves routine enforcement throughout the city and selective enforcement at locations where a disproportionate number of traffic collisions have occurred and, on those roadways, where complaints of high‐speed vehicles are received.

The volume and speed radar data were obtained from 05/25/21 to 06/09/21 , and the data was used to determine the recommended speed limits for the 58 street segments. The City requested that segments 12, 13, 15, 29, 34, 35, and 52 have its volume and speed radar data be updated and reevaluated with more recent data. The City had concerns that the COVID-19 pandemic and schools not being opened had impacted the results in 2021 for those selected segments. As a result, volume and radar data were obtained on 2/15/22 to reexamine said street segments to determine its recommended speed limit.

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 2
Engineering and Traffic Survey
The method prescribed by the latest California Vehicle Code and the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) is performance of an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The definition of an “Engineering and Traffic Survey” is contained in section 627 of the California Vehicle Code and is presented in the shaded Figure 1 box that follows:

Figure 1. Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 45, Stats. 2000. Effective January 1, 2001.

The California Vehicle Code has set certain regulations regarding the posting and enforcement of speed zones. These regulations generally reflect the viewpoint that speed zoning should be based on traffic conditions and natural driver behavior and not because of an arbitrary response to a traffic event or occurrence. This concept is known as the “Basic Speed Law.”

All fifty states of the United States base their speed regulations on the Basic Speed Law. In California CVC 22350 defines the basic speed law as shown in Figure 2:

Figure 2. Amended Ch. 252, Stats. 1963. Effective September 20, 1963.

Engineering and Traffic Survey
(a) “Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the hi ghway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one -quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

Figure 1. Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 45, Stats. 2000. Effective January 1, 2001.

Basic Speed Law
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Figure 2. Amended Ch. 252, Stats. 1963. Effective September 20, 1963.

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 3
This law recognizes that driving conditions vary widely from time ‐to‐time and place ‐to‐place; therefore, no set or fixed driving rules will adequately serve all conditions. The motorist s will constantly adjust their driving behavior to fit the conditions they encounter. Drivers must learn to do this with minimum assistance from law enforcement. The Basic Speed Law is founded on the belief that most motorists can modify their driving behavior properly if they are aware of conditions around them.

Several other statutes of the Vehicle Code are also significant in evaluating speed limits. Among these are:

Maximum Speed Limit
CVC 22349 states in California the maximum speed for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour. The Maximum speed for most trucks and for vehicles towing any trailer is 55 miles per hour.

CVC Section 22356 permits a maximum speed limit of 70 MPH on some highways.

Prima Facie Speed Limits (CVC 22352)
All other speed limits are prima facie limits, which, “on the face of it,” are reasonable and prudent under normal conditions. A driver may exceed any prima facie limit if it is safe to do so under prevailing conditions. However, when a police officer cites driver f or exceeding a prima facie speed limit, it is up to the driver to prove, if he can, that he was driving in a reasonable and prudent manner under the existing conditions. The opportunity given to the driver to exceed a prima facie speed limit when it is saf e to do so recognizes the fact that any posted speed limit cannot adequately reflect the many different conditions of traffic, weather, visibility, etc., that may be found on the same highway at different times.

CVC 22352 establishes 15 MPH limit in alley s, blind intersections, and blind railroad crossings and 25 MPH limit in business and residence districts as prima facie limits. There is also a part ‐ time 25 MPH limit in school zones when children are present in route to or from school or adjacent to a senior center.

Business and residence districts are defined in the Vehicle Code as specific areas meeting a specified minimum density of roadside development. CVC Section 235, 240 and 515 define their regulations as shown in Figure 3, Figure 4, and Figure 5. A count of houses or active businesses facing on a highway must be made to determine whether a valid business or residence district exists. The law does not require posting of prima facie speed limits when such roadside conditions are readily apparent.

Figure 3. (Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
CVC Excerpt
Business District
235. A “business district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.

Figure 3. (Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 4

Figure 4. (Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
Figure 5. (Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
Intermediate Speed Zones
State law permits local authorities to lower the maximum speed limit (65 MPH) or to raise the speed limit in business and residence districts (25 MPH) based on a traffic and engineering survey. These “intermediate speed limits” bet ween 25 and 65 MPH must be posted to clearly define the limits of the zone and the prima facie speed established. CVC 22357 authorizes the increase in limits.

These intermediate speed zones are the zones most typically enforced by radar. As a result, a current Engineering and Traffic survey is required to facilitate or justify these zones.

Speed Zoning Procedures
The MUTCD California Edition section 2B. 13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1) specifies a method for providing an Engineering and Traffic survey of speed limits on City and County roadways and Local Streets. It is excerpted in Figure 6, Figure 7, and Figure 8 as follows:

CVC Excerpt
Business and Residence Districts: Determination
240. In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions in Sections 235 and 515:
(a) No building shall be regarded unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.
(b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be regarded for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district. (c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs, and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures.
(d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.

Figure 4. (Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
CVC Excerpt
Residence
District
515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.

Figure 5. (Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 5

Figure 6. Section is referencing CA-MUTCD on page 136.

California MUTCD excerpts PG 136
2014 Edition Revision 6 (March 30, 2021)
Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
24 CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.

Standard:
25 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by Caltrans, consideration of all of the following:

A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.

B. Collision records.

C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Guidance:
26 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 27 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:

A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.

B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,

C. Devices, other than radar , capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.

D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section. If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section.

Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.

E. Speed measurements should be taken during off‐peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.

F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.

G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.

H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.

I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 miles should be avoided, except in transition areas.

J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.

K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.

L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 6
Support:
28 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning.

Refer to CVC 22358.5.

Option:
29 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:

A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 miles, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 miles the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 miles but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph 1 or 2 above.

B. Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
30 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:

1. State Highways ‐ The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Caltrans District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B‐101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
• Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone. • Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile. b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.

2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that

Figure 7. Section is referencing CA-MUTCD on page 136-137.

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 7

Conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two‐year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.

b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits – Figure 2B‐103(CA) & 2B‐104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.

31. In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency.

Guidance

32. The factors justifying a reduction below the 85 th percentile speed for the posted speed limit are the same factors mentioned above. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed zone survey or the accompanying engineering report.

33. The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.

Support:

34. Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not really apparent to the driver surfaces in collision histories

35. Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed. Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B‐102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits belo w the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals.

36. The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent. Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.

Option:

37. When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.

Guidance:

38. Speed zones of less than 0.5 miles and short transition zones should be avoided.

Figure 8. Section is referencing CA-MUTCD on page 137-138.

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 8
Definitions
Percentile Speeds – The percentile speed is a speed at or below which that percentage of the total sample is traveling.

50th Percentile – The median speed

85th Percentile – The critical speed is the 85th percentile. Motorists exceeding the 85the percentile speed are generally considered to be driving faster than is safe under prevailing conditions. This percentile may serve as the guide for establishing the posted speed limit.

Pace – The pace is the 10 MPH range of speeds containing the largest number of observations.

This can usually be determined by visual inspection of the Vehicle Speed Survey Sheet. After determining the pace, it is useful to compute the percentage of vehicles in the pace, the percentage over the pace and the percentage under the pace. A normal speed distribution will contain approximately 70% of the sample within the pace with 15% above and 15% below.

Collision Rate – Collision rates are calculated for each roadway segment surveyed and are summarized. Rates are calculated based on collisions per million vehicles miles of travel on that segment of roadway. This analysis has utilized the expected collision rates published by Caltrans in the “2010 Collision Data on California State Highways” publication. Los Angeles County guidelines classify as excessive any collision rate that exceeds 1.6 times the County expected rate. If the City mid ‐block collision rates are more than 1.6 times the County expected rate, a 5 MPH reduction of speed limit may be justified.

Local Street Exceptions (CVC 40802)
Many streets are designated as “Local” streets per CVC 40802(2)(b). The speed limit for these streets do not require special jurisdictions. The code is as follows:

For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. When a street or road does not appear on the “California Road System Maps,” it may be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:

1. Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.

2. Not more than one‐half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.

3. Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.

Other Considerations
Every street should be inspected for unusual traffic, roadway, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to a motorist. A check should be made of the adequacy of traffic control devices, roadway alignment, width, surface condition, collision history, and any unique traffic hazards that may exist. Any of these cond itions may warrant the selection of a speed lower than the 85th percentile speed for speed zoning.

The 25‐mile per hour prima facie limit in residence districts may not be reduced except on narrow streets as authorized by Section 22358.3 of the vehicle Code.

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 9
CVC 22358.3
Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Speed Survey Data - Procedures Used for the Speed Survey Program To identify the speed characteristics of vehicular traffic on the street system in Baldwin Park, a spot speed survey program was performed. Locations were selected on arterial , collector, and residential streets as designated by the City of Baldwin Park. Sufficient spot speed s urvey locations were selected to obtain a speed profile on each roadway.

City Traffic Counters ( CTC) accomplished the spot speed survey data and average daily traffic (ADT) collection. The summary of the spot speed data and ADT counts are shown in Appendix “A”. In order to ensure the creditability of vehicular speed analysis, the following guidelines were adhered to in the spot speed survey field data collection:

1. It was imperative that drivers may not be influenced to slow down by the presence of the speed survey vehicle, the equipment, or the personnel. The survey vehicle and equipment were unmarked, and emphasis was placed on locating them in an inconspicuous location.

2. Measurements were made at sufficient distance from intersections where signals or other control devices could affect normal operating speeds.

3. Measurements were not taken at locations where geometric, or roadway factors exist that could cause drivers to slow down from normal speeds. Such factors were sharp horizontal or vertical curve, poor pavement surface, roadway construction, etc.

4. The data was recorded on the “Radar Speed Meter – Data and Analysis Forms.”

5. The Vehicles were selected on a random basis. The samples are representative and do not include unusually high or low proportions of “speeders,” sports cars, trucks, etc.

6. The sample size is large enough to form a bell‐shaped curve. This normally requires 50 or more observations for each location, depending on the size and use of the streets.

7. The traffic conditions during the period of measurement were re presentative of normal traffic conditions.

The speed measured is established during non-peak hour to represent motorists speed during free flow. The 85th percentile shall represent the motorists speed during free flow movement and normal traffic conditions.

CTC conducted new spot speed survey for segments 12, 13, 15, 29 , 34, 35, and 52 on 2/15/22 per the City’s request. The tables indicated in this report and in the Appendix reflect the data obtained from the CTC on 2/15/22.

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 10
Roadway Conditions
Field reviews of the roadways in the City of Baldwin Park were conducted and incorporated int o the final recommended speed limits. These are pertinent roadway characteristics, surrounding land uses, and other factors that could have a bearing on the establishment of speed zones.

For this study, each roadway was divided into study sections. All da ta was then correlated and reviewed and summarized in Appendix “B.”
Speed Limit Posting
Speed limit signing should be installed in conformance with the California MUTCD. All speed limit signs must be reflective and conform to the current standards of the S tate of California, Department of Transportation. The following policies are recommended by the California MUTCD, for the placement of speed limit signs as shown in Figure 9.

Figure 9. Speed limit standards are referencing Section 2B.13 of the CA-MUTCD.

• Speed limits signs should be located at the beginning of all restricted speed zones. • Speed limit signs should be posted on street entrances to the City approximately 200 to 400 feet beyond the City entrance sign, no matter what the speed limit is.
• Speed limit signs should be installed approximately 200 feet, but not more than 500 feet beyond major intersections.
• Speed limit signs should be posted so that distance between speed limit signs will be approximately one mile.
• Streets with speed prima facie limits of 25 MPH need not be posted with speed limit signs, unless the streets are arterials or may appear to the driver to be arterials, and engineering and traffic investigation indicates that speed limit signing for a 25 MPH is required. Baldwin Park has adopted a policy to identify most major residence areas with posting of 25 MPH signs. • A speed limit sign should not be installed within 500 feet in advance of or within a curve or turn, which has been posted with a curve or a turn warning sign. • Pavement markings are not required but may be used in conjunction with postings. The City of Baldwin Park has adopted a policy to add pavement markings to key traffic control signs.

Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2‐1)
Standard:

03 Speed Limit (R2‐1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another.

04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is nece ssary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.

Figure 9. Speed limit standards are referencing Section 2B.13 of the CA-MUTCD.

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 11
Collision Data
Procedures Used for Collision Data Collection
The data collection for collisions for each roadway segment was selected from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) annual collision report for a duration of a three-year period. Two sets of three-year collision data are present in Appendix “C.” The up to date (1/3/19 to 1/3/22) collision data was used due to the request from the City to reanalyze segments 12, 13, 15, 29, 34, 35, and 52. All other segments used the three-year period from 4/24/18 to 4/24/21 to obtain the collision rate.

Procedures Used for Collision Rate
The collision rate is expressed in collision per million vehicle miles (MVM) and is calculated using the following formula:

𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 (𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑀𝑉𝑀⁄ ) = 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑥 1,000,000 𝐴𝐷𝑇 × 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 × 𝑁𝑜. 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑎𝑦𝑠
No. of collision = Number of collisions during the selected SWITRS survey period (3 years) for the segment in both directions
1,000,000 = Conversion factor for Million-Vehicle-Miles (MVM) Traveled ADT (veh/day) = Average Daily Traffic for the segment in both directions Distance (miles) = Roadway segment distance traveled by a vehicle No. of Days = Number of days during the selected SWITRS sample period (3 years = 1,095)
Counts were taken during summer, which may lead to a lower ADT value s. As a result, the calculated collision rates may be perceived higher than if the ADT were taken during a school day. ADT does not affect 85th percentile speed.

ADT Counts for segments 12, 13, 15, 29, 34, 35, and 52 were measured again during a school day as requested by the City. Five of the seven segments had a minor increase in volume while the other segments had a minor decrease in volume. Calculated collision rate for these segments is lower due to the decrease in the number of collisions for the most recent three year period.

To evaluate the collision pattern of each street segment, the calculated rates were compared to the expected collision rates provided from Caltrans in Table 1. The number of collisions, expected collision rates, and calculated collision rates are summarized in Table 2.

Table 1: Statewide Travel and Collision Rates for California State Highways Roadway Type: Urban Expected Collision Rate*
2 and 3 Lanes 0.96
4 Lane (Divided) 1.19
4 Lane (Undivided) 1.13
6 Lane (Divided) 1.18
6 Lane (Undivided) 1.28
*Source: 2018 collision data on California state highways published by California Department of Transportation
City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 12
Table 2: Collision Data Summary

No.

Street

Segment Class

Length
in
Miles

ADT

Number
of
Collisions

Expected
Collision
Rate

Calculated
Collision
Rate
1 Badillo St Ramona Blvd to East City Limit Arterial 0.56 14,588 6 1.19 0.67 2 Baldwin Park Blvd Live Oak Ave to Olive St Arterial 0.50 7,907 1 1.19 0.23 3 Baldwin Park Blvd Olive St to Los Angeles St Arterial 0.48 11,670 5 1.19 0.82 4 Baldwin Park Blvd Los Angeles St to Ramona Blvd Arterial 0.43 12,844 7 1.19 1.16 5 Baldwin Park Blvd Ramona Blvd to Merced Ave Arterial 0.55 14,529 8 1.19 0.91 6 Baldwin Park Blvd Merced Ave to Francisquito Ave Arterial 0.66 17,775 8 1.19 0.62 7 Baldwin Park Blvd Francisquito Ave to I-10 Arterial 0.34 21,948 17 1.19 2.08 8 Baldwin Park Blvd I-10 to South City Limit Arterial 0.36 25,696 10 1.19 0.99 9 Bess Ave I-10 to Baldwin Park Blvd Collector 0.32 7,337 4 0.96 1.56 10 Bess Ave Syracuse Ave to Frazier St Collector 0.48 3,411 11 0.96 6.14 11 Big Dalton Ave Pacific Ave to I-10 Collector 1.00 3,361 7 0.96 1.90 12 Center St Olive St to Los Angeles St Collector 0.48 1,769 2 0.96 2.15 13 Center St Los Angeles St to Ramona Blvd Collector 0.65 923 2 0.96 3.04 14 Commerce Dr Rivergrade Rd to Live Oak Ave Residential 0.61 1,545 1 0.96 0.97 15 Francisquito Ave Ramona Blvd to Frazier St Arterial 0.48 10,683 7 1.13 1.25 16 Francisquito Ave Frazier St to Baldwin Park Blvd Arterial 0.34 14,339 7 1.13 1.31 17 Francisquito Ave Baldwin Park Blvd to South City Limit Arterial 0.53 26,371 34 1.19 2.22 18 Frazier St Bess Ave to Francisquito Ave Collector 0.71 5,500 7 0.96 1.64 19 Harlan Ave Los Angeles St to Ramona Blvd Collector 0.72 3,510 3 0.96 1.08 20 Live Oak Ave Rivergrade Rd to Baldwin Park Blvd Arterial 0.55 28,483 10 1.19 0.58 21 Los Angeles St West City Limit to Center St Arterial 0.36 19,604 8 1.13 1.04 22 Los Angeles St Center St to Maine Ave Arterial 1.00 14,269 16 1.13 1.02 23 Los Angeles St Maine Ave to East City Limit Arterial 0.39 9,066 3 1.13 0.77 24 Maine Ave Arrow Hwy to Olive St Collector 0.49 7,966 5 0.96 1.17 25 Maine Ave Olive St to Los Angeles St Collector 0.49 11,302 9 0.96 1.48 26 Maine Ave Los Angeles St to Ramona Blvd Collector 0.36 14,824 15 0.96 2.57 27 Maine Ave Pacific Ave to Merced Ave Collector 0.73 3,564 5 0.96 1.76 28 Maine Ave Merced Ave to Francisquito Ave Collector 0.68 5,663 6 0.96 1.42 29 Merced Ave Olive St to Los Angeles St Arterial 0.50 3,822 6 1.13 2.87 30 Merced Ave Los Angeles St to Ramona Blvd Arterial 0.60 7,133 1 1.13 0.21 31 Merced Ave Ramona Blvd to Baldwin Park Blvd Arterial 0.36 8,452 5 1.13 1.50 32 Merced Ave Baldwin Park Blvd to Vineland Ave Arterial 0.36 13,176 7 1.13 1.35 33 Merced Ave Vineland Ave to Puente Ave Arterial 0.34 12,216 8 1.13 1.76 34 Olive St West City Limit to Baldwin Park Blvd Collector 0.73 4,147 2 1.13 0.60 35 Olive St Baldwin Park Blvd to East City Limit Collector 1.23 6,864 8 0.96 0.87 City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 13
Table 2: Collision Data Summary (Continued)

Note: The number of collisions shown is total midblock collision per segment within Table 2. For each intersection collision total, reference Appendix C. Appendix B collision intersection total is per street corridor. As a result, intersections collisions that are within two segments in the corridor are only accounted for once. For example, the intersection of Stewart Avenue and Olive Street is within segment 48 and 49 and is accounted for once in segment 48 and not segment 49 for the entirety of the Stewart corridor from segment 48 to segment 50.

No.

Street

Segment Class

Length
in Miles

ADT

Number of
Collisions

Expected
Collision
Rate

Calculated
Collision
Rate
36 Pacific Ave Ramona Blvd to Big Dalton Ave Arterial 0.43 17,905 19 0.96 2.25 37 Pacific Ave Big Dalton Ave to South City Limit Arterial 0.36 18,588 10 0.96 1.36 38 Puente Ave South City Limit to Merced Ave Arterial 0.76 25,191 23 1.19 1.10 39 Puente Ave Merced Ave to Root St Arterial 0.87 12,031 20 1.13 1.74 40 Puente Ave Root St to Ramona Blvd Arterial 0.51 4,815 6 0.96 2.23 41 Ramona Blvd I-605 to Francisquito Ave Arterial 0.70 27,738 13 1.19 0.61 42 Ramona Blvd Francisquito Ave to Merced Ave Arterial 0.96 20,438 18 1.19 0.84 43 Ramona Blvd Merced Ave to Baldwin Park Blvd Arterial 0.45 24,456 12 1.19 1.00 44 Ramona Blvd Baldwin Park Blvd to Badillo St Arterial 0.56 19,038 12 1.19 1.03 45 Ramona Blvd Badillo St to East City Limit Arterial 0.42 5,576 3 1.13 1.17 46 Rivergrade Rd Brooks Dr to Live Oak Ave Arterial 0.74 10,542 1 1.19 0.12 47 Root St Puente St to East City Limit Arterial 0.33 6,146 3 1.13 1.35 48 Stewart Ave Live Oak Ave to Olive St Collector 0.48 3,971 4 0.96 1.92 49 Stewart Ave Olive St to Los Angeles St Collector 0.48 2,254 4 0.96 3.38 50 Stewart Ave Los Angeles St to Ramona Blvd Collector 0.52 2,255 4 0.96 3.12 51 Syracuse Ave Bess Ave to Ramona Blvd Collector 0.49 3,745 6 0.96 2.99 52 Vineland Ave South City Limit to Merced Ave Collector 0.91 6,287 9 0.96 1.44 53 Vineland Ave Merced Ave to Pacific Ave Collector 0.67 4,609 5 0.96 1.48 54 Vineland Ave Pacific Ave to Badillo St Collector 0.41 3,524 7 0.96 4.42 55 Bogart Ave Pacific Ave to Ramona Blvd Residential 0.20 1,202 2 0.96 7.60 56 Downing Ave Pacific Ave to Ramona Blvd Residential 0.25 1,571 2 0.96 4.65 57 Frazier St/
Dalewood St Judith St to Baldwin Park Blvd Collector 0.51 5,983 4 0.96 1.20 58 Garvey Ave Syracuse Ave to Tracy St Collector 1.16 2,380 4 0.96 1.32 City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 14
Survey Results and Recommendation
The results of the surveys and findings as found in the “Study” are summarized in Tables 3 through 6. Supporting documentation is presented within Appendix “B.” Descriptions of the tables and recommendations for speed limit adjustment are indicated below in the following four categories:

1. Table 3 (SUMMARY) presents a summary of all locations surveyed and subsequent speed posting recommendations.

2. Table 4 (NO CHANGE) presents a summary of the locations where the current speed limit remains the same. These are locations where the 85th percentile speed complies with the current posted speed limit, or the segment is exempt due to residential, or business prima facie speed zones and no adverse conditions exist which would suggest or require a change to the speed limit.

3. Table 5 (JUSTIFIED) presents a summary of the locations where the 85th percentile speed exceeds current posted speed limit. However, the existing posted speed limit can be justified based on the posted limit of adjacent segments or other factors not readily apparent to the driver. See Figure 10 for a more detailed explanation from the California Manual for Setting Speed Limits . Justifications are presented in remarks section and on the engineering and traffic survey sheets contained in Appendix “B.”

4. Table 6 (DECREASED) summarizes locations where speeds must be decreased when the 85th percentile indicate lowering is appropriate or roadway characteristics or adjacent development fall within prima facia categories pursuant to California Vehicle Code.

A radar speed zone map of the existing posted speed limits and the proposed posted speed limits are shown in Appendix “D.”

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

` 15
Table 3: Speed Survey Summary

No.

Street

Segment

Length
in
Miles

ADT

85th
Percentile
(mph)

Posted
Speed
Limit

Recom'd
Speed
Limit

` 16
Table 3: Speed Survey Summary (Continued)

No.

Street

Segment

Length
in
Miles

ADT

85th
Percentile
(mph)

Posted
Speed
Limit

Recom'd
Speed
Limit

As a result, a separate study must be implemented for each segment to warrant a specific calming measure to be placed.

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

17 Table 4: Survey Supports Current Posted Speed Limit – No Change

No.

Street

Segment

Length
in
Miles

ADT

85th
Percentile
(mph)

Posted
Speed
Limit

Recom'd
Speed
Limit

Result

Justification
3 Baldwin Park Blvd
Olive St to
Los Angeles St 0.48 11,670 43 40 40 NO CHANGE

Existing limit consistent with 85th percentile
4 Baldwin Park Blvd
Los Angeles St to
Ramona Blvd 0.43 12,844 41 40 40 NO CHANGE

Existing limit consistent with 85th percentile
5 Baldwin Park Blvd
Ramona Blvd to
Merced Ave 0.55 14,529 41 40 40 NO CHANGE

Existing limit consistent with 85th percentile
7 Baldwin Park Blvd
Francisquito Ave to
I-10 0.34 21,948 38 40 40 NO CHANGE

Existing limit consistent with 85th percentile
8 Baldwin Park Blvd
I-10 to
South City Limit 0.36 25,696 37 40 40 NO CHANGE

Existing limit consistent with 85th percentile
9 Bess Ave
I-10 to
Baldwin Park Blvd 0.32 7,337 31 30 30 NO CHANGE

Existing limit consistent with 85th percentile
13 Center St
Los Angeles St to
Ramona Blvd 0.65 923 33 30 30 NO CHANGE

Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
14 Commerce Dr
Rivergrade Rd to
Live Oak Ave 0.61 1,545 37 40 40 NO CHANGE

Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
17 Francisquito Ave
Baldwin Park Blvd
to South City Limit 0.53 26,371 34 35 35 NO CHANGE

Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
18 Frazier St
Bess Ave to
Francisquito Ave 0.71 5,500 38 35 35 NO CHANGE

Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
20 Live Oak Ave
Rivergrade Rd to
Baldwin Park Blvd 0.55 28,483 43 45 45 NO CHANGE

Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
21 Los Angeles St
West City Limit to
Center St 0.36 19,604 43 40 40 NO CHANGE

Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
22 Los Angeles St
Center St to Maine
Ave 1.00 14,269 39 40 40 NO CHANGE

Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
23 Los Angeles St
Maine Ave to East
City Limit 0.39 9,066 41 40 40 NO CHANGE

Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
24 Maine Ave
Arrow Hwy to Olive
St 0.49 7,966 38 35 35 NO CHANGE

Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
25 Maine Ave
Olive St to Los
Angeles St 0.49 11,302 33 35 35 NO CHANGE

Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
26 Maine Ave
Los Angeles St to
Ramona Blvd 0.36 14,824 32 35 35 NO CHANGE

Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

18 Table 4: Survey Supports Current Posted Speed Limit – No Change (Continued)

No.

Street

Segment

Length
in
Miles

ADT

85th
Percentile
(mph)

Posted
Speed
Limit

Recom'd
Speed
Limit

Result

Justification
27 Maine Ave
Pacific Ave to
Merced Ave 0.73 3,564 38 35 35 NO CHANGE Existing limit supported by 85th percentile 28 Maine Ave
Merced Ave to
Francisquito Ave 0.68 5,663 37 35 35 NO CHANGE Existing limit supported by 85th percentile 29 Merced Ave
Olive St to
Los Angeles St 0.50 3,822 37 35 35 NO CHANGE
Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
30 Merced Ave
Los Angeles St to
Ramona Blvd 0.60 7,133 37 35 35 NO CHANGE Existing limit supported by 85th percentile 31 Merced Ave
Ramona Blvd to
Baldwin Park Blvd 0.36 8,452 38 35 35 NO CHANGE Existing limit supported by 85th percentile 32 Merced Ave
Baldwin Park Blvd
to Vineland Ave 0.36 13,176 35 35 35 NO CHANGE Existing limit supported by 85th percentile 33 Merced Ave
Vineland Ave to
Puente Ave 0.34 12,216 36 35 35 NO CHANGE Existing limit supported by 85th percentile 38 Puente Ave
South City Limit to
Merced Ave 0.76 25,191 43 40 40 NO CHANGE Existing limit supported by 85th percentile 39 Puente Ave
Merced Ave to Root
St 0.87 12,031 42 40 40 NO CHANGE Existing limit supported by 85th percentile 41 Ramona Blvd
I-605 to
Francisquito Ave 0.70 27,738 40 40 40 NO CHANGE Existing limit supported by 85th percentile 42 Ramona Blvd
Francisquito Ave to
Merced Ave 0.96 20,438 43 40 40 NO CHANGE
Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
43 Ramona Blvd
Merced Ave to
Baldwin Park Blvd 0.45 24,456 39 40 40 NO CHANGE
Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
44 Ramona Blvd
Baldwin Park Blvd
to Badillo St 0.56 19,038 33 35 35 NO CHANGE
Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
47 Root St
Puente St to
East City Limit 0.33 6,146 41 40 40 NO CHANGE
Existing limit supported by 85th percentile
50 Stewart Ave
Los Angeles St to
Ramona Blvd 0.52 2,255 33 30 30 NO CHANGE
Existing limit supported by 85th percentile

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

19 Table 5: Survey Speeds Differ from Posted Speed, Limit Can be Justified

No.

Street

Segment

Length
in
Miles

ADT

85th
Percentile
(mph)

Posted
Speed
Limit

Recom'd
Speed
Limit

Result

Justification
1 Badillo St
Ramona Blvd to
East City Limit 0.56 14,588 45 40 40 JUSTIFIED
Consistent posting with adjacent segment
justifies reduction of 85th by 5 MPH. This is a
transition segment as it changes to 45 MPH as
this street enters the City of West Covina
2 Baldwin Park Blvd
Live Oak Ave to
Olive St 0.50 7,907 46 40 40 JUSTIFIED
Consistent posting with adjacent segment
justified reduction of 85th by 5 MPH
6 Baldwin Park Blvd
Merced Ave to
Francisquito Ave 0.66 17,775 44 40 40 JUSTIFIED
Consistent posting with adjacent segment
justified reduction of 85th by 5 MPH
10 Bess Ave
Syracuse Ave to
Frazier St 0.48 3,411 30 25 25 JUSTIFIED
Segment is within a residence district existing
speed limit prima facia 25 MPH CVC
22352(b)(1)
11 Big Dalton Ave Pacific Ave to I-10 1.00 3,361 39 25 25 JUSTIFIED Segment is within a residence district existing
speed limit prima facia 25 MPH CVC
22352(b)(1)
12 Center St
Olive St to Los
Angeles St 0.48 1,769 34 30 30 JUSTIFIED
Uncontrolled crosswalk and high calculated
collision rate of 2.15 justify round down of 85th
percentile speed
15 Francisquito Ave
Ramona Blvd to
Frazier St 0.48 10,683 41 35 35 JUSTIFIED
Uncontrolled crosswalk justifies reduction of
85th percentile by 5 MPH
16 Francisquito Ave
Frazier St to Baldwin
Park Blvd 0.34 14,339 40 35 35 JUSTIFIED
Two (2) uncontrolled crosswalk justifies
reduction of 85th percentile by 5 MPH
19 Harlan Ave
Los Angeles St to
Ramona Blvd 0.72 3,510 37 25 25 JUSTIFIED
Segment is within a residence district existing
speed limit prima facia 25 MPH CVC
22352(b)(1).
34 Olive St
West City Limit to
Baldwin Park Blvd 0.73 4,147 36 30 30 JUSTIFIED
Uncontrolled crosswalk justifies reduction of
85th percentile speed by 5 MPH
35 Olive St
Baldwin Park Blvd
to East City Limit 1.23 6,864 34 30 30 JUSTIFIED
Consistent with adjacent roadway segment
justify round down of 85th by 5 MPH
40 Puente Ave
Root St to
Ramona Blvd 0.51 4,815 35 30 30 JUSTIFIED
Two (2) uncontrolled crosswalk justifies
reduction of 85th percentile by 5 MPH
45 Ramona Blvd
Badillo St to East
City Limit 0.42 5,576 42 35 35 JUSTIFIED
Consistent with adjacent roadway segment
justifies reduction of 85th by 5 MPH
46 Rivergrade Rd
Brooks Dr to Live
Oak Ave 0.74 10,542 51 45 45 JUSTIFIED
Segment is within a business district justifies
reduction of 85th percentile by 5 MPH
48 Stewart Ave
Live Oak Ave to
Olive St 0.48 3,971 37 30 30 JUSTIFIED
Poor driveway visibility justifies reduction from
85th by 5 MPH
City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

20 Table 5: Survey Speeds Differ from Posted Speed, Limit Can be Justified (Continued)

No.

Street

Segment

Length
in
Miles

ADT

85th
Percentile
(mph)

Posted
Speed
Limit

Recom'd
Speed
Limit

Result

Justification
49 Stewart Ave
Olive St to
Los Angeles St 0.48 2,254 34 30 30 JUSTIFIED
Poor driveway visibility justifies reduction from
85th by 5 MPH
51 Syracuse Ave
Bess Ave to
Ramona Blvd 0.49 3,745 35 30 30 JUSTIFIED
Two (2) uncontrolled crosswalk justifies
reduction of 85th percentile by 5 MPH
52 Vineland Ave
South City Limit to
Merced Ave 0.91 6,287 34 30 30 JUSTIFIED
Uncontrolled crosswalk justifies round down of
85th percentile by 5 MPH
53 Vineland Ave
Merced Ave to
Pacific Ave 0.67 4,609 37 30 30 JUSTIFIED
Uncontrolled crosswalk justifies reduction of
85th percentile by 5 MPH
54 Vineland Ave
Pacific Ave to
Badillo St 0.41 3,524 36 30 30 JUSTIFIED
Consistent posting with adjacent segment
justifies reduction of 85th by 5 MPH
55 Bogart Ave
Pacific Ave to
Ramona Blvd 0.20 1,202 31 NP 25 JUSTIFIED
Uncontrolled crosswalk and segment is within
business district justifies reduction of 85th
percentile by 5 MPH
56 Downing Ave
Pacific Ave to
Ramona Blvd 0.25 1,571 34 NP 25 JUSTIFIED
Segment is within a residence district with an
existing speed limit prima facia 25 MPH CVC
22352 (b)(1)
57 Frazier St/
Dalewood St
Judith St to
Baldwin Park Blvd 0.51 5,983 32 NP 25 JUSTIFIED
Segment is within a business district justifies
reduction of 85th percentile by 5 MPH
58 Garvey Ave
Syracuse Ave to
Tracy St 1.16 2,380 31 NP 25 JUSTIFIED
Segment is within a residence district existing
speed limit prima facia 25 MPH CVC
22352(b)(1)

Figure 10. Referencing section 3.4.4 of the California Manual for Setting Speed Limits.

California Manual for Setting Speed Limits (Revised February 2020)

When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed of fr ee-flowing traffic, rounding as standard mathematics directs. Under some circumstances the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile spee d. If a 5 mph reduction is justified, the E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 22358.

CVC 21400 allows for setting the speed limit at the 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile even if mathemat ical rounding would require the speed to be posted above the 85th percentile. If this option is used, then the additional 5 mph reduction cannot be used. In effect, this law allows an enginee r to round down to the nearest increment of the 85th instead of up. The engineer cannot then take a further reduction.

Figure 10. Referencing section 3.4.4 of the California Manual for Setting Speed Limits.

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

21 Table 6: Survey Speeds Differ from Posted Speed, Limit Must be Decreased

No.

Street

Segment

Length
in
Miles

ADT

85th
Percentile
(mph)

Posted
Speed
Limit

Recom'd
Speed
Limit

Result

Justification
36 Pacific Ave
Ramona Blvd to Big
Dalton Ave 0.43 17,905 37 40 35 DECREASED
A new lane configuration with bike lanes has
reduced the 85th percentile speed. Justifies
lowering posted speed by 5 MPH.
37 Pacific Ave
Big Dalton Ave to
South City Limit 0.36 18,588 36 40 35 DECREASED
A new lane configuration with bike lanes has
reduced the 85th percentile speed. Justifies
lowering posted speed by 5 MPH

City of Baldwin Park
Citywide Speed Zone Survey and Speed Limit Study (Engineering and Traffic Survey)

Appendix “A”
Spot Speed Survey Data Sheets and Average Daily Traffic Counts

DATE: 05/27/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 11:54AM 12:21PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RAMONA BLVD AND EAST CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 15285 BADILLO ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 X 0 1 1 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 X X X X 1 3 4 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 0 0 0
50 X X X X X 5 0 5
49 X X X 1 2 3
48 X X X 3 0 3
47 X X X X X 3 2 5
46 X X X X X X 2 4 6
45 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 85TH %: 45 45 45 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 4 13
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 50TH %: 40 39 39 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13
36 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 15TH %: 34 33 33 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 13 19 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 34 - 43 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 *
32 X X X 3 0 3 P % IN PACE: 65% 58% 62%
31 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 0 9 9 C % OVER PACE: 22% 23% 23%
29 X 0 1 1 E
28 X X X 2 1 3 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 19% 15%
27 X 0 1 1 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 40 39 39 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 28 40 34
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.25 0.36 0.15
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.50 0.60 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
113 113 226
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

BADILLO STREET
DATE: 05/26/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 12:35PM 1:02PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): FRANCISQUITO AVE AND I-10 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3119 BALDWIN PARK BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 X X 2 0 2
48 X X 0 2 2
47 X X X X 3 1 4
46 X X 0 2 2
45 X X X X X 5 0 5
44 X X X X 3 1 4
43 X X 2 0 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 0 0
41 X X 0 2 2
40 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 85TH %: 39 38 38 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 2 2 4
38 X X X X X X X X X X 0 10 10 50TH %: 27 31 30 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
36 X X X 1 2 3 15TH %: 22 26 24 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X 2 3 5 *
34 X X X X 2 2 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 25 - 34 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 2 12 14 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 12 16 P % IN PACE: 58% 68% 62% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 14 21 C % OVER PACE: 24% 26% 25% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 11 16 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 * % UNDER PACE: 18% 5% 13% 27 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 13 29 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 32 31 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14
24 X X X X X X 5 1 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 62 36 50
23 X X X X X X X 5 2 7
22 X X X X 4 0 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 8 6 7 M.P.H.
21 X X X X X 5 0 5
20 X X X X X X 5 1 6 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.28 0.19 19 X X X X X 5 0 5
18 X X X X 2 2 4 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.69 0.53 0.44 M.P.H. 17 X 0 1 1
16 X 1 0 1
15 X 1 0 1
131 130 261

BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/26/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 2:08PM 2:32PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): I-10 AND SOUTH CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 957 BALDWIN PARK BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 1 0 1
46 0 0 0
45 X X 1 1 2
44 X X X X 4 0 4
43 X 0 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X 2 0 2
41 X X 2 0 2
40 X X X X X 5 0 5 85TH %: 38 36 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 3 2 5
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 50TH %: 32 31 31 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13 15TH %: 27 27 27 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19 P % IN PACE: 68% 78% 73% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10 23 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 C % OVER PACE: 28% 19% 24% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 13 16 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7 19 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 3% 3% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 11 17 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 31 32 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X 3 2 5
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 27 20 24
23 X X 1 1 2
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.17 0.10
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.42 0.32 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
120 115 235
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD
DATE: 05/26/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 10:14AM 10:51AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LIVE OAK AVE AND OLIVE ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 5118 BALDWIN PARK BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 1 0 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 X X X 1 2 3
50 X X X X 2 2 4
49 X X X 1 2 3
48 X X X X X X 1 5 6
47 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9
46 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12
43 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13
41 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 85TH %: 44 47 46 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8 20
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 50TH %: 38 41 39 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6 19
36 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 15TH %: 33 35 34 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 *
34 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 39 - 48 36 - 45 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 *
32 X X X X X X 3 3 6 P % IN PACE: 65% 61% 62%
31 X X X 2 1 3 A
30 X X X X 3 1 4 C % OVER PACE: 14% 7% 16%
29 X X 1 1 2 E
28 X 1 0 1 * % UNDER PACE: 20% 33% 22%
27 X 1 0 1 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 41 40 M.P.H.
25 X 1 0 1
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 33 29 32
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.28 0.16
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.56 0.53 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
104 104 208
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD
DATE: 05/26/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 11:26AM 11:48AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LOS ANGELES ST AND RAMONA BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4234 BALDWIN PARK BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 X 0 1 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 0 1 1
50 X 0 1 1
49 0 0 0
48 X 0 1 1
47 0 0 0
46 X 0 1 1
45 X X X 2 1 3
44 X X 1 1 2
43 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X 2 4 6
41 X X X X X X 2 4 6
40 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 85TH %: 39 42 41 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 12 16 50TH %: 35 37 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 12 23 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5 16 15TH %: 31 32 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 12 24 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 33 - 42 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4 15 P % IN PACE: 79% 72% 75% 31 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 A
30 X X X X X 4 1 5 C % OVER PACE: 11% 12% 15%
29 X X X X X X 2 4 6 E
28 X X X X X 3 2 5 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 16% 9%
27 X X 1 1 2 *
26 X 0 1 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35 37 36 M.P.H.
25 X 1 0 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17 30 24
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.16 0.28 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.53 0.33 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
107 106 213
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD
DATE: 05/26/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 12:13PM 12:29PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MERCED AVE AND FRANCISQUITO AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3575 BALDWIN PARK BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 X 1 0 1
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 1 0 1
53 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 0 1 1
50 X 0 1 1
49 X 0 1 1
48 X 1 0 1
47 X X X 2 1 3
46 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
45 X X X X X 3 2 5
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5 18
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 5 15 85TH %: 44 43 44 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 14 22
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 50TH %: 40 38 39 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19 15TH %: 34 32 33 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 35 - 44 35 - 44 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 *
32 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 P % IN PACE: 73% 64% 69%
31 X X X X 3 1 4 A
30 X X X X X 1 4 5 C % OVER PACE: 12% 9% 10%
29 X X X X X X X X X X 2 8 10 E
28 X X 0 2 2 * % UNDER PACE: 15% 27% 21%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 40 38 39 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 27 27 28
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.24 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.49 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
119 112 231
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD
DATE: 05/26/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 10:52AM 11:22AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): OLIVE ST AND LOS ANGELES ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4711 BALDWIN PARK BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 X 1 0 1
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 0 1 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X X 1 1 2
50 X X 2 0 2
49 X X 0 2 2
48 X X X X X X 6 0 6
47 X X 1 1 2
46 X X X X X 2 3 5
45 X X X X X 3 2 5
44 X X X X 4 0 4
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 10 13 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9 21
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 85TH %: 45 43 43 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 50TH %: 39 39 39 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 15TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 *
34 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 35 - 44 34 - 43 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 *
32 X X X X X 2 3 5 P % IN PACE: 68% 76% 72%
31 X X X X 3 1 4 A
30 X X 2 0 2 C % OVER PACE: 16% 10% 15%
29 X X 0 2 2 E
28 X X 0 2 2 * % UNDER PACE: 16% 14% 13%
27 X X 1 1 2 *
26 X X 1 1 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 39 39 M.P.H.
25 X 1 0 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 33 25 29
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.31 0.24 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.56 0.49 0.37 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
106 105 211
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD
DATE: 05/26/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 11:53AM 12:10PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RAMONA BLVD AND MERCED AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3876 BALDWIN PARK BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X 0 1 1
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 X 0 1 1
47 X X X X 2 2 4
46 X X 1 1 2
45 X X X 1 2 3
44 X X 1 1 2
43 X X X X X X 1 5 6 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X 2 3 5
41 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 85TH %: 40 42 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 50TH %: 35 36 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 11 21 15TH %: 30 31 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 P % IN PACE: 72% 67% 69% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 C % OVER PACE: 8% 19% 15% 29 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 E
28 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 * % UNDER PACE: 21% 14% 15%
27 X X X X X 4 1 5 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35 36 36 M.P.H.
25 X 1 0 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 29 26
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.20 0.27 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.45 0.52 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
106 107 213
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

BALDWIN PARK BOULEVARD
DATE: 06/02/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 9:01AM 9:37AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): I-10 AND BALDWIN PARK BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 13050 BESS AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X 1 0 1
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 32 30 31 M.P.H.
39 X X X 3 0 3
38 X X 2 0 2 50TH %: 26 26 26 M.P.H.
37 X 1 0 1
36 X X 2 0 2 15TH %: 22 23 23 M.P.H.
35 X X 1 1 2 *
34 X X X X X X 3 3 6 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 23 - 32 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 X X X 3 0 3 *
32 X X X X X X 4 2 6 P % IN PACE: 70% 90% 80%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 13 18 C % OVER PACE: 19% 3% 12% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 15 20 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 * % UNDER PACE: 11% 7% 8% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 20 31 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 27 27 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 26 10 18 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 22 X X X X X X X X X X X 9 2 11 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 3 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13
20 X X X 3 0 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.25 0.09 0.08
19 X X 2 0 2
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.50 0.29 0.28 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
105 119 224
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

BESS AVENUE
DATE: 06/02/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 9:46AM 10:54AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SYRACUSE AVE AND FRAZIER ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 12918 BESS AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0 This street segment took additional time to attain the 57 0 0 0 100 samples in each direction. It took one hour and ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0 eight minutes.
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X 1 0 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X 1 0 1
40 X 1 0 1 85TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 25 26 26 M.P.H.
37 X 0 1 1
36 X X X X 4 0 4 15TH %: 19 21 21 M.P.H.
35 X X 0 2 2 *
34 X X 1 1 2 * 10 MPH PACE: 20 - 29 20 - 29 20 - 29 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X 1 4 5 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 9 12 P % IN PACE: 67% 79% 74% 31 X X X X X X 3 3 6 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 C % OVER PACE: 18% 15% 17% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 19 28 * % UNDER PACE: 15% 6% 9% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 21 29 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 26 26 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 13 21
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 15 25 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 31 16 22 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 11 14
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 4 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 12 16
20 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.30 0.10 0.08 19 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9
18 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.55 0.31 0.28 M.P.H. 17 X X X X 3 1 4
16 X X X X X 4 1 5
15 0 0 0
103 168 271
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

BESS AVENUE
DATE: 06/03/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 3:03PM 3:51PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PACIFIC AVE AND I-10 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3465 BIG DALTON AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 0 1 1
48 0 0 0
47 X X X 2 1 3
46 X 1 0 1
45 X 1 0 1
44 X X 1 1 2
43 X X X X 3 1 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X 2 2 4
41 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9
40 X X X X 2 2 4 85TH %: 39 39 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
38 X X X X X X X X X X 9 1 10 50TH %: 32 30 31 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 3 17 15TH %: 24 23 23 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 2 8 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 26 - 35 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 *
32 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 P % IN PACE: 48% 50% 46%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 C % OVER PACE: 14% 22% 16% 29 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 * % UNDER PACE: 38% 28% 37% 27 X X X X X X 3 3 6 *
26 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 31 31 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 4 13
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 53 47 51 23 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10
22 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 7 7 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X 4 2 6
20 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.46 0.22 19 X X X X 2 2 4
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.63 0.68 0.46 M.P.H. 17 X 0 1 1
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
132 103 235
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

BIG DALTON AVENUE
DATE: 06/09/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 11:53AM 2:13PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PACIFIC AVE AND RAMONA BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: PARKING STRUCTURE FOR METROLINK/FRONTIER COMMUNICATION 63 0 0 0 EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: NOT POSTED OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0 This street segment took additional time to attain 57 0 0 0 100 samples in each direction. It took two hours and ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0 20 minutes.
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 X 0 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 X 1 0 1 85TH %: 34 30 31 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 X X 2 0 2 50TH %: 25 25 25 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 4 1 5
36 X X X X 1 3 4 15TH %: 19 21 20 M.P.H.
35 X X X 2 1 3 *
34 X X X X X 5 0 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 20 - 29 20 - 29 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X 1 4 5 *
32 X X X 2 1 3 P % IN PACE: 64% 76% 70%
31 X X X X 0 4 4 A
30 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 C % OVER PACE: 19% 17% 20%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 * % UNDER PACE: 17% 6% 10% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 12 16 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 26 26 26 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 36 22 29 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9
20 X X X X X X X X X X 2 8 10 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.35 0.20 0.14 19 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11
18 X X X X 2 2 4 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.59 0.45 0.37 M.P.H. 17 X X X X X X 5 1 6
16 X 1 0 1
15 0 0 0
103 109 212

BOGART AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 02/15/22 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 1:03PM 2:20PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): OLIVE ST AND LOS ANGELES ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4507 CENTER ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 0 1 1
43 X 0 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X 0 3 3
41 X 0 1 1
40 X X 0 2 2 85TH %: 32 35 34 M.P.H.
39 X X X 1 2 3
38 X X 1 1 2 50TH %: 29 31 30 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 2 2 4
36 X X 1 1 2 15TH %: 26 26 26 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 *
34 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 25 - 34 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 9 12 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 P % IN PACE: 82% 74% 78% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 13 25 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 C % OVER PACE: 8% 19% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8 25 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8 20 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 7% 9% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 *
26 X X X X X X 3 3 6 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 31 30 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9
24 X X X X X 2 3 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13 28 21
23 X X X 2 1 3
22 X X X X 4 0 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X X X 1 2 3
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.13 0.28 0.11
19 X 1 0 1
18 X 0 1 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.36 0.53 0.33 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUD
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
TO

CENTER STREET
DATE: 02/15/22 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 3:22PM 4:49PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LOS ANGELES ST AND RAMONA BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4073 CENTER ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 32 33 33 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X X 0 2 2 50TH %: 29 30 29 M.P.H.
37 X X 1 1 2
36 X X X X 1 3 4 15TH %: 25 26 25 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X 3 3 6 *
34 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 24 - 33 25 - 34 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 11 18 P % IN PACE: 83% 83% 83% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 13 26 C % OVER PACE: 8% 10% 8% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 7% 10% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7 19 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 30 29 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10
24 X X X X X 4 1 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 18 16
23 X X X X X 4 1 5
22 X X 1 1 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 X X 1 1 2
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.14 0.18 0.08
19 0 0 0
18 X X X 3 0 3 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.42 0.29 M.P.H. 17 X X 0 2 2
16 0 0 0
15 X 0 1 1
100 100 200

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
TO

CENTER STREET
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 06/03/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 10:54AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RIVERGRADE RD AND LIVE OAK AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 5051 COMMERCE DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0 This street segment took additional time to attain 57 0 0 0 100 samples in one direction. It took one hour and ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0 54 minutes.
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 X 0 1 1
44 X 0 1 1
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X 1 2 3
41 X X X 1 2 3
40 X X X X X 2 3 5 85TH %: 35 38 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 0 5 5
38 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 50TH %: 30 32 31 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X 5 0 5
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 0 11 11 15TH %: 26 27 27 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4 17 P % IN PACE: 75% 70% 69% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 12 15 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 C % OVER PACE: 19% 20% 17% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 E
28 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 * % UNDER PACE: 7% 10% 14%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 33 32 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9
24 X X X X 3 1 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 23 23
23 X X X 2 1 3
22 X 1 0 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.22 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.47 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
91 105 196

COMMERCE DRIVE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 06/09/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 2:17PM 4:04PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PACIFIC AVE AND RAMONA BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: DOWNING AVE/CENTRAL AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: NOT POSTED OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0 This street segment took additional time to attain 57 0 0 0 100 samples in each direction. It took one hour and ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0 47 minutes.
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 1 0 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X 0 1 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X 2 0 2
41 X X 2 0 2
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 35 33 34 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 X X 1 1 2 50TH %: 27 25 26 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 3 1 4
36 X X X X 4 0 4 15TH %: 20 18 20 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X 4 2 6 *
34 X X X X X 2 3 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 20 - 29 20 - 29 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 P % IN PACE: 55% 59% 57%
31 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 A
30 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 C % OVER PACE: 27% 23% 28%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 * % UNDER PACE: 18% 17% 14% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 *
26 X X X X X X 5 1 6 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 25 26 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 50 34 42 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 14
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 STANDARD DEVIATION: 7 6 7 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X 2 4 6
20 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.48 0.29 0.20 19 X X X 1 2 3
18 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.69 0.54 0.44 M.P.H. 17 X X X X X X 1 5 6
16 X X X X X X 3 3 6
15 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
104 111 215
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

DOWNING AVENUE
DATE: 05/25/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 1:48PM 2:04PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN PARK BLVD AND SOUTH CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: SIERRA CENTER/TARGET PARKING LOT 63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 31 30 30 M.P.H.
37 X X X 2 1 3
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 15TH %: 28 26 27 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 26 - 35 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8 21 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6 21 P % IN PACE: 89% 86% 86% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 14 25 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 14 25 C % OVER PACE: 11% 7% 11% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 12 23 * % UNDER PACE: 0% 7% 2% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X 2 10 12 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 30 30 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11
24 X X X X 0 4 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 10 11 10
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3 3 3 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.09 0.10 0.05
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.30 0.31 0.22 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
107 115 222

FRANCISQUITO AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/25/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 2:08PM 2:25PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): FRAZIER ST AND BALDWIN PARK BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 13529 FRANCISQUITO AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 X 0 1 1
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 0 1 1
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X X X 1 2 3
45 X 0 1 1
44 X X X 2 1 3
43 X X X X X 3 2 5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
41 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 85TH %: 41 40 40 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 50TH %: 35 36 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 15TH %: 31 31 31 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 5 15 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 31 - 40 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 P % IN PACE: 72% 73% 72% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 C % OVER PACE: 9% 15% 22% 29 X X X 1 2 3 E
28 X X X 1 2 3 * % UNDER PACE: 19% 12% 6%
27 X 0 1 1 *
26 X X 2 0 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35 36 36 M.P.H.
25 X X X 2 1 3
24 X X 2 0 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 24 25 25
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.23 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.48 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
110 107 217

FRANCISQUITO AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 02/15/22 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 2:59PM 3:16PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RAMONA BLVD AND FRAZIER ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 13233 FRANCISQUITO AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 1 0 1
48 0 0 0
47 X X X 3 0 3
46 X X X 2 1 3
45 X X 2 0 2
44 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
43 X X X 1 2 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X 3 3 6
41 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
40 X X X X X X 4 2 6 85TH %: 42 39 41 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 50TH %: 34 35 34 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
36 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8 15TH %: 29 30 29 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 14 18 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 30 - 39 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 P % IN PACE: 63% 73% 67%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6 17 C % OVER PACE: 32% 15% 23% 29 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 * % UNDER PACE: 5% 12% 11% 27 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
26 X X 0 2 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35 35 35 M.P.H.
25 X X X 1 2 3
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 35 21 28
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.35 0.21 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.59 0.46 0.37 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUD
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
TO

FRANCISQUITO AVENUE
DATE: 06/02/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 10:57AM 12:03PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BESS AVE AND FRANCISQUITO AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3047 FRAZIER ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X X 0 2 2
45 0 0 0
44 X X 0 2 2
43 X X X X 0 4 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X 1 4 5
41 X X X X X X X X X X 1 9 10
40 X X X X X X X 1 6 7 85TH %: 36 40 38 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 0 4 4
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 50TH %: 31 35 33 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 11 14
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 14 21 15TH %: 25 29 27 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 32 - 41 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 P % IN PACE: 70% 64% 65% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4 16 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 C % OVER PACE: 11% 9% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 E
28 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 * % UNDER PACE: 19% 28% 21%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 *
26 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 34 33 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10
24 X X X X 3 1 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 30 29
23 X X X 2 1 3
22 X X X 2 1 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X 1 0 1
20 X X 1 1 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.22 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 X 0 1 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.46 0.47 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
103 138 241
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

FRAZIER STREET
DATE: 06/03/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:01AM 10:29AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): JUDITH ST AND BALDWIN PARK BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: LEORITA ST/DALEWOOD ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: NOT POSTED OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0 This street segment took additional time to
57 0 0 0 attain 100 samples in each direction. It took one hour ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0 and 28 minutes.
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X X 2 0 2
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 27 28 28 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 2 2 4
36 X X X 3 0 3 15TH %: 23 25 23 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 *
34 X X X X X 3 2 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 22 - 31 24 - 33 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 3 16 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 P % IN PACE: 79% 86% 80% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 4 17 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 12 28 C % OVER PACE: 19% 9% 18% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10 28 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 15 35 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 5% 2% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 12 34 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 12 28 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 28 28 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 10 30 24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 4 23 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 11 17 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 3 24 22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 1 19 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 3 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X 5 1 6
20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.08 0.11 0.05
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.33 0.22 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
232 102 334

FRAZIER STREET/DALEWOOD STREET
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUD
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 06/03/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 10:38AM 11:39AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SYRACUSE AVE AND TRACY ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: FAIRGROVE AVE/GARVEY AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: NOT POSTED OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 X 1 0 1
44 0 0 0
43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 33 30 31 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 X X X X 4 0 4 50TH %: 26 25 26 M.P.H.
37 X X 2 0 2
36 X X 1 1 2 15TH %: 22 21 21 M.P.H.
35 X X X X 2 2 4 *
34 X X X X 4 0 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 21 - 30 21 - 30 21 - 30 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X 2 3 5 *
32 X X X X 2 2 4 P % IN PACE: 72% 79% 75%
31 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 10 13 C % OVER PACE: 24% 10% 17% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 * % UNDER PACE: 4% 11% 8% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 11 15 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 27 25 26 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9 22
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 30 16 24 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17
22 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 20 X X X X X X X X X X X 2 9 11 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.15 0.11 19 X X X X 1 3 4
18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.39 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
104 107 211
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO

GARVEY AVENUE
DATE: 06/02/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 1:29PM 2:32PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LOS ANGELES ST AND RAMONA BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4111 HARLAN AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X X 1 1 2
45 0 0 0
44 X X 0 2 2
43 X X 1 1 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X 1 0 1
41 X X X X 1 3 4
40 X X X X 2 2 4 85TH %: 37 39 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X 2 7 9
38 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 50TH %: 32 33 33 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 6 22
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 15TH %: 28 28 28 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4 15 P % IN PACE: 79% 68% 74% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8 21 C % OVER PACE: 9% 20% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5 18 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 13% 12% 27 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 *
26 X X X 1 2 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 33 33 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X 4 2 6
24 X X X X X 3 2 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 26 24
23 X X X 1 2 3
22 X X 1 1 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.17 0.26 0.11
19 X 1 0 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.42 0.51 0.33 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
123 102 225

HARLAN AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/26/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 9:22AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RIVERGRADE RD AND BALDWIN PARK BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 14020 LIVE OAK AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X 1 0 1
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 0 0 0
50 X X 2 0 2
49 X 1 0 1
48 X X 2 0 2
47 X X X 3 0 3
46 X X X X X X 2 4 6
45 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8
44 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
43 X X X X X X 4 2 6 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 13 26 85TH %: 44 41 43 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 50TH %: 38 37 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8 20
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11 25 15TH %: 34 33 33 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 16 21 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 32 - 41 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 11 17 P % IN PACE: 72% 82% 77% 31 X X X X 1 3 4 A
30 X 1 0 1 C % OVER PACE: 25% 15% 20%
29 X X 1 1 2 E
28 0 0 0 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 3% 3%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 37 38 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25 16 21
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.23 0.14 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.37 0.30 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
112 120 232

LIVE OAK AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/27/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 1:57PM 2:18PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): CENTER ST AND MAINE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 14313 LOS ANGELES ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 1 0 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 1 0 1
50 X 0 1 1
49 0 0 0
48 X 1 0 1
47 0 0 0
46 X X X X 3 1 4
45 X X X 2 1 3
44 X 0 1 1
43 X X 2 0 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X 1 3 4
41 X X 1 1 2
40 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 85TH %: 39 38 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 50TH %: 34 35 35 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 16 25 15TH %: 30 31 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 30 - 39 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10 28 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19 P % IN PACE: 76% 84% 79% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 C % OVER PACE: 24% 9% 16% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 * % UNDER PACE: 0% 7% 4%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35 35 35 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25 16 21
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.15 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.38 0.30 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
116 111 227

LOS ANGELES STREET
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/27/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 1:25PM 1:53PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MAINE AVE AND EAST CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 14536 LOS ANGELES ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 1 0 1
49 X X 0 2 2
48 X 0 1 1
47 X X 2 0 2
46 X X X 3 0 3
45 X 1 0 1
44 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9
43 X X X X X 5 0 5 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 1 13
40 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 85TH %: 41 40 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8 21
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8 23 50TH %: 37 35 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 15TH %: 32 31 31 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 31 - 40 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15 P % IN PACE: 72% 75% 71% 31 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 9 2 11 C % OVER PACE: 11% 14% 14% 29 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 E
28 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 * % UNDER PACE: 17% 11% 15%
27 X 0 1 1 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 36 36 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 22 22
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.16 0.22 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.40 0.46 0.31 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
134 104 238

LOS ANGELES STREET
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/27/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 2:22PM 2:38PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WEST CITY LIMIT AND CENTER ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 13413 LOS ANGELES ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 X 1 0 1 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 1 0 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X X 2 0 2
49 X X 2 0 2
48 X X X 2 1 3
47 X X X X 4 0 4
46 X X X X 3 1 4
45 X X X X X 3 2 5
44 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8
43 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 2 13
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 85TH %: 44 40 43 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8 24 50TH %: 38 36 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13 15TH %: 33 32 33 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 13 22 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 13 18 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 31 - 40 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 P % IN PACE: 65% 78% 70% 31 X X X X X X 2 4 6 A
30 X X X X 1 3 4 C % OVER PACE: 23% 15% 21%
29 X X X X X X 3 3 6 E
28 X X 2 0 2 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 7% 9%
27 X X 1 1 2 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 36 38 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 31 17 26
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 4 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.16 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.51 0.40 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
120 106 226

LOS ANGELES STREET
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/25/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:10AM 9:53AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ARROW HWY AND OLIVE ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4820 MAINE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 0 1 1
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X X 1 1 2
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X X X X X X 3 3 6 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X 0 5 5
41 X X X 1 2 3
40 X X X X X 1 4 5 85TH %: 36 39 38 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X 0 10 10
38 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 50TH %: 33 34 33 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X 2 4 6
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 15TH %: 28 29 29 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7 23 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 6 24 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19 P % IN PACE: 80% 64% 72% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 C % OVER PACE: 5% 23% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 E
28 X X X X X X 2 4 6 * % UNDER PACE: 15% 13% 14%
27 X X X X X X 4 2 6 *
26 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 34 33 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
24 X X 1 1 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17 29 23
23 X 1 0 1
22 X X 0 2 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.15 0.26 0.10
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.51 0.32 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
116 111 227

MAINE AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/25/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 10:26AM 10:45AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LOS ANGELES ST AND RAMONA BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4335 MAINE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 33 31 32 M.P.H.
39 X 0 1 1
38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 29 28 28 M.P.H.
37 X X 2 0 2
36 X X 2 0 2 15TH %: 26 24 25 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X 4 1 5 *
34 X X X X X X X 6 1 7 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 P % IN PACE: 85% 89% 84% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21 C % OVER PACE: 5% 3% 8% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11 25 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 8% 7% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 21 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 28 29 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 2 13 15
24 X X X X X X X X X X X 2 9 11 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13 11 13 23 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
22 X X X X X 3 2 5 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 3 4 M.P.H.
21 X X X 1 2 3
20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.13 0.10 0.06
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.35 0.31 0.24 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
106 111 217

MAINE AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/25/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 11:57AM 12:48PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MERCED AVE AND FRANCISQUITO AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3528 MAINE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X 0 1 1
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 1 0 1
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X 1 0 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X X X X 2 2 4
40 X X X 1 2 3 85TH %: 36 38 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11
38 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 50TH %: 32 33 32 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8
36 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 15TH %: 28 28 28 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 30 - 39 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 P % IN PACE: 78% 73% 74% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 12 24 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 C % OVER PACE: 15% 6% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 E
28 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 * % UNDER PACE: 7% 22% 12%
27 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 *
26 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 33 33 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X 3 3 6
24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17 23 20
23 X X 1 1 2
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.17 0.23 0.10
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.48 0.32 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
101 102 203

MAINE AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/25/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:56AM 10:19AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): OLIVE ST AND LOS ANGELES ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4724 MAINE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 33 33 33 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 X X 1 1 2 50TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 X X 0 2 2 15TH %: 25 26 26 M.P.H.
35 X 0 1 1 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 25 - 34 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 P % IN PACE: 89% 89% 89% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 C % OVER PACE: 3% 4% 3% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 18 29 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 12 23 * % UNDER PACE: 8% 7% 8% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 29 29 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15
24 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13 11 12
23 X X X X X X 4 2 6
22 X X X X 2 2 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 3 3 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.12 0.10 0.05
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.35 0.31 0.23 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
107 110 217

MAINE AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/25/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 10:51AM 11:51AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PACIFIC AVE AND MERCED AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3903 MAINE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X X 0 2 2
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X X X 2 1 3
43 X X 1 1 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X 3 2 5
41 X X X X 3 1 4
40 X X X 1 2 3 85TH %: 37 38 38 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
38 X X X X X X X 1 6 7 50TH %: 34 33 33 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19 15TH %: 29 27 28 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 4 13 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 3 15 P % IN PACE: 80% 64% 72% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 C % OVER PACE: 14% 19% 17% 29 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 * % UNDER PACE: 6% 17% 11% 27 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 *
26 X X X X X 1 4 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 33 33 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X 2 4 6
24 X X X X 1 3 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 31 25
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 6 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.30 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.42 0.55 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
104 105 209

MAINE AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 06/01/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 2:03PM 2:21PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN PARK BLVD AND VINELAND AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 14122 MERCED AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 X 1 0 1
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 36 33 35 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 31 29 30 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5 19 15TH %: 26 25 26 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 1 12 *
34 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 27 - 36 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 P % IN PACE: 76% 84% 75% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4 15 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 16 24 C % OVER PACE: 8% 11% 22% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 14 24 * % UNDER PACE: 16% 4% 3% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 11 21 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 11 21 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 29 30 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12
24 X X X X X X X X X X X 1 10 11 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 17 12 16 23 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.15 0.11 0.07
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.33 0.26 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
118 116 234

MERCED AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 06/01/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 12:27PM 12:52PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LOS ANGELES ST AND RAMONA BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4309 MERCED AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0 This street segment took additional time to attain 57 0 0 0 the 100 samples in each direction. It took one hour ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0 and 25 minutes to complete.
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 1 0 1
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X X 1 1 2
46 X 1 0 1
45 X 1 0 1
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X 0 2 2
41 X X 0 2 2
40 X X 1 1 2 85TH %: 37 38 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X 2 4 6
38 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 50TH %: 33 33 33 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 15TH %: 28 28 28 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 13 29 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 P % IN PACE: 77% 78% 77% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 15 22 A 30 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 C % OVER PACE: 10% 19% 18%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 11 16 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 3% 5% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 *
26 X X X 3 0 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 33 33 M.P.H.
25 X X 1 1 2
24 X X X 2 1 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 19 20
23 X 1 0 1
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.20 0.18 0.10
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.45 0.43 0.31 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
108 103 211

MERCED AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 02/15/22 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 11:27AM 12:59PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): OLIVE ST AND LOS ANGELES ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4711 MERCED AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 1 0 1
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X 1 0 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 0 0 0
40 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 85TH %: 37 38 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 1 4 5
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 50TH %: 34 35 34 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23 15TH %: 31 32 31 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 15 26 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 12 24 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 31 - 40 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12 25 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23 P % IN PACE: 91% 94% 92% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 C % OVER PACE: 6% 0% 6% 29 X X X 2 1 3 E
28 X 1 0 1 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 6% 3%
27 X 1 0 1 *
26 X 1 0 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 35 34 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 11 8 9
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3 3 3 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.11 0.08 0.05
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.33 0.28 0.21 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
TO

MERCED AVENUE
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 06/01/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 12:56PM 1:20PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RAMONA BLVD AND BALDWIN PARK BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3730 MERCED AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 0 1 1
50 0 0 0
49 X 1 0 1
48 0 0 0
47 X X 1 1 2
46 X 1 0 1
45 X 0 1 1
44 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X 1 2 3
41 X X X X X X 3 3 6
40 X X X 1 2 3 85TH %: 37 39 38 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 0 4 4
38 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 50TH %: 33 33 33 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 15TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 4 13 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 * 10 MPH PACE: 29 - 38 27 - 36 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 13 21 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 14 27 P % IN PACE: 79% 73% 75% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 C % OVER PACE: 10% 24% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 E
28 X X X X 1 3 4 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 4% 11%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 *
26 X X X X X 4 1 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 34 34 M.P.H. 25 X X 1 1 2
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 26 24
23 X X 0 2 2
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.25 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.46 0.50 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
104 106 210

MERCED AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 06/01/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 2:24PM 2:47PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): VINELAND AVE AND PUENTE AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 14340 MERCED AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 0 1 1
43 X X 2 0 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 0 0
41 X X X 3 0 3
40 X X X 1 2 3 85TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
39 X X X 1 2 3
38 X X X X X X 3 3 6 50TH %: 32 30 31 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 15TH %: 28 26 27 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 25 - 34 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7 20 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8 20 P % IN PACE: 83% 73% 75% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7 24 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 C % OVER PACE: 8% 25% 8% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 16 26 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * % UNDER PACE: 8% 3% 17% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 10 13 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 32 31 32 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X 0 8 8
24 X X X 0 3 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 19 17
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.12 0.16 0.07
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.35 0.40 0.27 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
118 118 236

MERCED AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 02/15/22 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:11AM 10:10AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN PARK BLVD AND EAST CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 14333 OLIVE ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 0 1 1
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X X X X 1 3 4
40 X X 0 2 2 85TH %: 31 35 34 M.P.H.
39 X X 0 2 2
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 28 31 29 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 0 4 4
36 X X X 2 1 3 15TH %: 25 27 26 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X 2 3 5 *
34 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 26 - 35 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 12 17 P % IN PACE: 85% 78% 81% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 C % OVER PACE: 5% 15% 12% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9 21 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 7% 8% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5 18 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 31 30 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X 9 2 11
24 X X X X X 2 3 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13 20 18
23 X X X 2 1 3
22 X X X X 3 1 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 X X 2 0 2
20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.13 0.20 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.36 0.45 0.30 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
TO

OLIVE STREET
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
DATE: 02/15/22 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 10:14AM 11:24AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WEST CITY LIMIT AND BALDWIN PARK BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 14053 OLIVE ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 0 0 0
45 X X X 0 3 3
44 0 0 0
43 X X 1 1 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X X X 1 2 3
40 X X 1 1 2 85TH %: 35 37 36 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 2 2 4
38 X X X X 3 1 4 50TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 1 4 5
36 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 15TH %: 26 26 26 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 P % IN PACE: 76% 70% 73% 31 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 C % OVER PACE: 11% 22% 17% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 8% 11% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 32 31 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11
24 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 28 24
23 X 0 1 1
22 X 1 0 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.19 0.28 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.44 0.53 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
TO

OLIVE STREET
DATE: 05/27/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 12:33PM 12:51PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BIG DALTON AVE AND SOUTH CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 14848 PACIFIC AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X X 0 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X 0 1 1
41 X 1 0 1
40 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 85TH %: 37 35 36 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X 5 1 6
38 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 50TH %: 33 31 32 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X 2 4 6
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 15TH %: 29 28 28 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 7 26 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 26 - 35 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 11 21 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 P % IN PACE: 81% 85% 82% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 13 24 C % OVER PACE: 15% 15% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 11 18 * % UNDER PACE: 5% 0% 4% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X 2 10 12 *
26 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 32 32 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13 15 14
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.12 0.14 0.07
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.35 0.37 0.26 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
109 107 216

PACIFIC AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/27/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 12:53PM 1:16PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): RAMONA BLVD AND BIG DALTON AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 14623 PACIFIC AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 0 0 0
45 X 0 1 1
44 X X 1 1 2
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X X 2 2 4
41 X X X X 3 1 4
40 X X X X 2 2 4 85TH %: 37 38 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9
38 X X X X X X 2 4 6 50TH %: 33 32 33 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 5 15 15TH %: 29 29 29 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7 19 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 12 24 P % IN PACE: 84% 78% 81% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 C % OVER PACE: 13% 16% 15% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 15 24 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 7% 5% 27 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 33 33 33 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 14 19 17
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.14 0.18 0.08
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.37 0.42 0.28 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
105 107 212

PACIFIC AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/27/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:24AM 9:46AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MERCED AVE AND ROOT ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 346 PUENTE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 0 0 0
50 X X 1 1 2
49 X X X X X 2 3 5
48 X X X 1 2 3
47 X 1 0 1
46 X X X 3 0 3
45 X X X 2 1 3
44 X X X X X 3 2 5
43 X X X X 1 3 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X 5 0 5
41 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 85TH %: 42 41 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 50TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 15TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 32 - 41 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 P % IN PACE: 68% 73% 71% 31 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 C % OVER PACE: 19% 13% 16%
29 X X X 1 2 3 E
28 X X X X 3 1 4 * % UNDER PACE: 13% 14% 13%
27 X X X 1 2 3 *
26 X 0 1 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 37 37 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 27 27 27
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.26 0.26 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.51 0.51 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
104 104 208

PUENTE AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/27/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 10:51AM 11:49AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): ROOT ST AND RAMONA BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3913 PUENTE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 1 0 1
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X 1 1 2
41 X X X X 2 2 4
40 X 1 0 1 85TH %: 35 35 35 M.P.H.
39 X X X 1 2 3
38 X X X X 1 3 4 50TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X 4 2 6
36 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 15TH %: 27 26 26 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 * 10 MPH PACE: 26 - 35 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19 P % IN PACE: 76% 75% 75% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 4 13 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9 22 C % OVER PACE: 14% 14% 14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 * % UNDER PACE: 10% 11% 11% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 11 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 31 31 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X 4 2 6
24 X X X X X X 2 4 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 23 21 22
23 X X X X 1 3 4
22 X X 1 1 2 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X X X X 2 2 4
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.21 0.19 0.10
19 0 0 0
18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.46 0.44 0.32 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
107 109 216

PUENTE AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/27/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:00AM 9:18AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SOUTH CITY LIMIT AND MERCED AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 1813 PUENTE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 X 1 0 1
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 1 0 1
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 X X 1 1 2
50 0 0 0
49 X X 1 1 2
48 X 0 1 1
47 X X 2 0 2
46 X X X 3 0 3
45 X X X X X 3 2 5
44 X X X X X X X X X 8 1 9
43 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X 9 1 10
41 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 85TH %: 44 40 43 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 50TH %: 37 36 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 14 22
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 11 17 15TH %: 32 31 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 13 24 * 10 MPH PACE: 33 - 42 31 - 40 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 *
32 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 P % IN PACE: 63% 77% 67%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 A
30 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 C % OVER PACE: 20% 15% 16%
29 X X X X X X 3 3 6 E
28 X X X 1 2 3 * % UNDER PACE: 17% 8% 17%
27 X X X X 4 0 4 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 36 37 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 34 20 28
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 4 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.19 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.43 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
122 107 229

PUENTE AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
CLOUDY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/26/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 3:46PM 4:18PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BADILLO ST AND EAST CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 15003 RAMONA BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 1 0 1
50 X 0 1 1
49 0 0 0
48 X X X X X 3 2 5
47 X X X X X 3 2 5
46 X X X X X 3 2 5
45 X X X 1 2 3
44 X X X 1 2 3
43 X X X X 1 3 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X 4 2 6
41 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14 85TH %: 42 41 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 50TH %: 35 35 35 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 15TH %: 30 31 31 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 30 - 39 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 P % IN PACE: 63% 72% 67% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 12 18 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 C % OVER PACE: 18% 24% 19% 29 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 E
28 X X X X X 5 0 5 * % UNDER PACE: 19% 4% 14%
27 X X 2 0 2 *
26 X 0 1 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
25 X X 2 0 2
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 34 26 30
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.32 0.25 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.57 0.50 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
106 105 211

RAMONA BOULEVARD
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/26/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 3:14PM 3:36PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BALDWIN PARK BLVD AND BADILLO ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 14226 RAMONA BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X 1 0 1
40 X X 1 1 2 85TH %: 33 33 33 M.P.H.
39 X X X 1 2 3
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %: 28 28 28 M.P.H.
37 X X X 1 2 3
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 23 25 25 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X 4 2 6 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 24 - 33 23 - 32 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19 P % IN PACE: 77% 87% 80% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 C % OVER PACE: 16% 12% 16% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 14 23 * % UNDER PACE: 7% 1% 4% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 29 29 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 14 16 23 X X X X X X X X X X 9 1 10
22 X X X X X 5 0 5 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 X X X 3 0 3
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.17 0.13 0.08
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.42 0.36 0.28 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
107 106 213

RAMONA BOULEVARD
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/25/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 3:19PM 3:40PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): FRANCISQUITO AVE AND MERCED AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 13105 RAMONA BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 0 1 1
50 X X X 1 2 3
49 X X X X 3 1 4
48 X X X X 1 3 4
47 0 0 0
46 X X X X 1 3 4
45 X X X X X 1 4 5
44 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8
43 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14
40 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 85TH %: 41 44 43 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 3 13 50TH %: 37 36 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8 22
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 18 31 15TH %: 32 33 33 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12 26 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 34 - 43 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 P % IN PACE: 76% 64% 69% 31 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 A
30 X X X X X X 2 4 6 C % OVER PACE: 15% 17% 17%
29 X X X X X 4 1 5 E
28 X 1 0 1 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 19% 14%
27 X 0 1 1 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 38 38 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 29 26
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.24 0.10
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.42 0.49 0.32 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
125 123 248

RAMONA BOULEVARD
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/25/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 2:57PM 3:14PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): I-605 AND FRANCISQUITO AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 13001 RAMONA BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 1 0 1
48 X X 2 0 2
47 X X X X 3 1 4
46 0 0 0
45 X X X X 2 2 4
44 X X X X 2 2 4
43 X X X X 1 3 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X 2 4 6
41 X X X X X 3 2 5
40 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 85TH %: 40 40 40 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 13 19
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21 50TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7 21
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7 24 15TH %: 32 31 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9 21 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5 17 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 P % IN PACE: 82% 81% 81% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 C % OVER PACE: 15% 13% 14%
29 X 1 0 1 E
28 0 0 0 * % UNDER PACE: 3% 6% 5%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 36 36 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 17 18
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.17 0.16 0.08
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.41 0.40 0.29 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
116 104 220

RAMONA BOULEVARD
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/26/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 2:48PM 3:07PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MERCED AVE AND BALDWIN PARK BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 14001 RAMONA BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 X X 0 2 2
47 X 0 1 1
46 X 1 0 1
45 X X X 2 1 3
44 X X 1 1 2
43 X X X X X 2 3 5 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X 2 0 2
41 X X X 1 2 3
40 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 85TH %: 39 39 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 11 17 50TH %: 35 35 35 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 13 22
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 15TH %: 32 31 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 13 24 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 30 - 39 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 P % IN PACE: 82% 83% 82% 31 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11 C % OVER PACE: 8% 14% 13% 29 X X X X X 4 1 5 E
28 X X 1 1 2 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 3% 5%
27 X X X 2 1 3 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35 36 35 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 15 19 17
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.14 0.18 0.08
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.38 0.42 0.28 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
107 107 214

RAMONA BOULEVARD
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/26/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 9:29AM 10:07AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BROOKS DR AND LIVE OAK AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4920 RIVERGRADE RD
63 X 0 1 1
62 0 0 0
61 X 0 1 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 X 1 0 1
59 X 1 0 1 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 X X 1 1 2 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X X X X 1 3 4
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X X X X X 3 2 5
53 X X X X X X 4 2 6 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10
51 X X X X X X X 6 1 7
50 X X X X X X 5 1 6
49 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10
48 X X X X X X 3 3 6
47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 13 18
46 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7 21 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 10 1 11
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12
40 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 85TH %: 51 49 51 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 3 2 5
38 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 50TH %: 43 44 44 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11
36 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 15TH %: 37 36 37 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 *
34 X X X X X 2 3 5 * 10 MPH PACE: 37 - 46 40 - 49 40 - 49 M.P.H. 33 X X X X 1 3 4 *
32 X X X X 2 2 4 P % IN PACE: 55% 60% 56%
31 X X X 0 3 3 A
30 0 0 0 C % OVER PACE: 33% 15% 19%
29 X X 1 1 2 E
28 0 0 0 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 25% 25%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 44 44 44 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 39 46 42
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 7 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.46 0.18
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.67 0.42 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
131 102 233

RIVERGRADE ROAD
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 05/27/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 9:51AM 10:44AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PUENTE ST AND EAST CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 15050 ROOT ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 X 1 0 1
48 X 0 1 1
47 X X 0 2 2
46 X 0 1 1
45 X X X 1 2 3
44 X X 1 1 2
43 X X X 1 2 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19 85TH %: 40 41 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 5 15
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 50TH %: 36 36 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8 19 15TH %: 33 32 33 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 15 26 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 32 - 41 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 P % IN PACE: 86% 77% 81% 31 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 A
30 X X 2 0 2 C % OVER PACE: 12% 12% 10%
29 X X X 0 3 3 E
28 X 0 1 1 * % UNDER PACE: 2% 11% 9%
27 X X 0 2 2 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 36 36 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 13 23 18
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.12 0.20 0.08
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.34 0.45 0.28 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
110 111 221

ROOT STREET
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUD
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 06/03/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 10:58AM 11:56AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LIVE OAK AVE AND OLIVE ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 5055 STEWART AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 X 0 1 1
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 X X 0 2 2
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X 0 2 2
41 X X X X 1 3 4
40 X X 0 2 2 85TH %: 35 38 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 1 3 4
38 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8 50TH %: 30 33 31 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10
36 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 15TH %: 25 25 25 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 29 - 38 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7 20 P % IN PACE: 71% 61% 61% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 C % OVER PACE: 16% 12% 11% 29 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 * % UNDER PACE: 14% 27% 28% 27 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 32 31 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11
24 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 20 35 29 23 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9
22 X X X X 1 3 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 6 5 M.P.H.
21 X X X 3 0 3
20 X X 0 2 2 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.19 0.31 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.44 0.56 0.37 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
103 110 213

STEWART AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUD
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 06/03/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 1:08PM 1:59PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LOS ANGELES ST AND RAMONA BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4141 STEWART AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 X X 2 0 2 85TH %: 33 32 33 M.P.H.
39 X X 1 1 2
38 X 1 0 1 50TH %: 28 28 28 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 3 1 4
36 X X X 2 1 3 15TH %: 23 23 23 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 *
34 X X X X 4 0 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 P % IN PACE: 69% 78% 73% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 C % OVER PACE: 10% 7% 11% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11 24 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 * % UNDER PACE: 21% 15% 16% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 28 28 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 22 17 20 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 4 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X 3 1 4
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.19 0.16 0.09
19 X X X X 2 2 4
18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.44 0.40 0.30 M.P.H. 17 X 0 1 1
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
115 108 223

STEWART AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 06/03/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 11:59AM 1:04PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): OLIVE ST AND LOS ANGELES ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4641 STEWART AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 X 0 1 1
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X X 1 1 2
40 X 1 0 1 85TH %: 32 35 34 M.P.H.
39 X X X 0 3 3
38 X X X X X 0 5 5 50TH %: 28 28 28 M.P.H.
37 X X 0 2 2
36 X X X X X 1 4 5 15TH %: 23 22 23 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 * 10 MPH PACE: 23 - 32 22 - 31 22 - 31 M.P.H. 33 X X X X 4 0 4 *
32 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 P % IN PACE: 75% 61% 67%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9 23 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 C % OVER PACE: 15% 29% 25% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 * % UNDER PACE: 9% 10% 8% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 28 29 29 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10
24 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 32 26 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5 16
22 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 6 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9
20 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.18 0.28 0.12 19 X X 1 1 2
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.43 0.53 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
106 113 219

STEWART AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 06/02/21 DAY: Wednesday TIME PERIOD: 12:16PM 1:22PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BESS AVE AND RAMONA BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3349 SYRACUSE AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 X 0 1 1
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X 2 1 3
41 X 0 1 1
40 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 85TH %: 34 37 35 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X 0 8 8
38 X X 0 2 2 50TH %: 28 29 29 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X 2 4 6
36 X X X 0 3 3 15TH %: 24 25 24 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 24 - 33 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11 P % IN PACE: 73% 66% 69% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 2 14 16 C % OVER PACE: 10% 27% 17% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 * % UNDER PACE: 17% 8% 15% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 15 25 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 11 17 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 29 30 30 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6 18
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 23 33 29 23 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10
22 X X X 2 1 3 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H.
21 X X X X 4 0 4
20 X X X 0 3 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.22 0.25 0.12
19 X X 1 1 2
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.47 0.50 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
104 132 236

SYRACUSE AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 06/01/21 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 3:29PM 4:01PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): MERCED AVE AND PACIFIC AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3461 VINELAND AVE
63 0 0 0
62 X 0 1 1
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 1 0 1
48 X 1 0 1
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X X X 2 1 3
43 X X 2 0 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X 0 1 1
41 X X X X 2 2 4
40 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 85TH %: 38 37 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X 2 3 5
38 X X X X X X 3 3 6 50TH %: 34 33 33 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 15TH %: 30 29 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 4 19 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 18 28 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 P % IN PACE: 78% 77% 78% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10 24 A 30 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 C % OVER PACE: 16% 14% 15%
29 X X X X X X 3 3 6 E
28 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 * % UNDER PACE: 6% 9% 7%
27 X X X 2 1 3 *
26 X X 1 1 2 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 34 33 34 M.P.H.
25 X X X 0 3 3
24 X X 1 1 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 21 26 24
23 X X 1 1 2
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X X 1 1 2
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.20 0.26 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.45 0.51 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
106 102 208

VINELAND AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 06/03/21 DAY: Thursday TIME PERIOD: 2:16PM 2:59PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): PACIFIC AVE AND BADILLO ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3956 VINELAND AVE
63 X 1 0 1
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X X 2 0 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 0 0
41 X X X 3 0 3
40 X X 2 0 2 85TH %: 37 35 36 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8
38 X X X X X 1 4 5 50TH %: 31 30 30 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 15TH %: 24 25 25 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4 16 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 * 10 MPH PACE: 28 - 37 25 - 34 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5 16 P % IN PACE: 66% 74% 67% 31 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10 25 C % OVER PACE: 11% 17% 12% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 13 22 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23 * % UNDER PACE: 23% 9% 21% 27 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 *
26 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 31 30 31 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9
24 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 38 18 29 23 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
22 X X X X 3 1 4 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 4 5 M.P.H.
21 X X X 3 0 3
20 X X X X X X X 6 1 7 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.17 0.12 19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.41 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
136 107 243

VINELAND AVENUE
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE: 02/15/22 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 2:28PM 2:52PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): SOUTH CITY LIMIT AND MERCED AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3827 VINELAND AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 0 0 0
40 X 0 1 1 85TH %: 33 35 34 M.P.H.
39 X X X 2 1 3
38 X X X 2 1 3 50TH %: 29 30 29 M.P.H.
37 X 0 1 1
36 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 15TH %: 26 26 26 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X 0 9 9 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 26 - 35 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 P % IN PACE: 91% 80% 84% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6 18 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23 C % OVER PACE: 7% 10% 13% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8 23 * % UNDER PACE: 2% 10% 3% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9 22 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 30 30 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11
24 X X X X 2 2 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 11 16 13
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 3 4 4 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.11 0.16 0.07
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.33 0.40 0.26 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
CARLOS

PARTLY CLOUD
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF BALDWIN PARK
TO

VINELAND AVENUE
City Traffic Counters
www.ctcounters.com
Badillo Street
Btwn Ramona Blvd & East City Limit

Page 1 ends

Baldwin Park City CouncilMarch 16, 2022

Baldwin Park City Council
March 16, 2022