Agenda packet — Banning City Council, December 10, 2024 (part 2 of 8)

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Lincoln Bogard, Administrative Services Director MEETING DATE: December 10, 2024
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2024-06 SA, Approving the Establishment of Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) 25-26 A and B for the Period of July 2025 through June 2026 and Approving Certain Related Actions
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2024-06 SA.

BACKGROUND:

Pursuant to Health and Safety Code (the “HSC”) Section 34172(a)(1), the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Banning was dissolved on February 1, 2012. Consistent with the provisions of the HSC, the City Council of the City of Banning previously elected to serve in the capacity of the Successor Agency. The Oversight Board has been established pursuant to HSC Section 34179 to assist in the wind-down of the dissolved Redevelopment Agency.

Per HSC Section 34177(o)(1), the Successor Agency is required to prepare a ROPS before each twelvemonth fiscal year period. Pursuant to HSC Section 34180(g), Oversight Board approval is required for the establishment of each ROPS. Pursuant to HSC Section 34177(o)(1), an Oversight Board-approved ROPS 25-26 A and B for the period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 must be submitted to the State Department of Finance, State Controller’s Office and to the County Auditor-Controller not later than February 1, 2025. The Oversight Board will approve the establishment of ROPS 25-26 A and B.

The Successor Agency staff has prepared the proposed Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the period of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 ("ROPS 25-26"), substantially in the form shown in Exhibit "A".

The Successor Agency staff has prepared an administrative budget for the fiscal period commencing on July 1, 2025, and continuing through June 30, 2026 (“FY 2025-26 Administrative Budget”), substantially in the form shown in Exhibit "B".

Successor Agency is entitled to an administrative cost allowance (the “Administrative Cost Allowance”) pursuant to HSC Sections 34171(b) and 34183(a)(3) in the approximate amount of [$250,000] for the 2025-26 fiscal year of which approximately [$125,000] will be disbursed July 1, 2025, and approximately [$125,000] will be disbursed January 2, 2026.

JUSTIFICATION:

At its meeting on January 18, 2024, the Countywide Oversight Board for the Successor Agency (“Oversight Board”) to the dissolved Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Banning 374
(“Successor Agency”) approved the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”) with the adoption of Resolution 2024-024 (Oversight Board Resolution).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Per HSC Section 34177, the Successor Agency is legally required to continue to make payments due for enforceable obligations. The Oversight Board has approved the establishment of ROPS 25-26 A and B, which will ensure that the Successor Agency has the authority to continue to pay its enforceable obligations.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Adopt Resolution 2024-06 SA as recommended.

2. Adopt Resolution 2024-06 SA with modifications.

BUDGETED?:

Yes
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2024-06 SA, ROPS.docx

2. Attachment 1a - Exhibit A ROPS 25-26 City of Banning.pdf

3. Attachment 1b-Exhibit B City of Banning SA Admin Budget FY25-26.pdf

4. Attachment 2-Resolution No. 2024-024_Banning SA ROPS 2024-25 and Admin Budget.pdf 375
Resolution 2024-06 SA

Page 1 of 6 ends

RESOLUTION 2024-06 SA

RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CITY OF BANNING APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE 25-26 A & B FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 2025 THROUGH JUNE 2026 AND APPROVING CERTAIN

RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code (the “HSC”) § 34172 (a ) (1), the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Banning was dissolved on February 1, 2012; and
WHEREAS, consistent with the provisions of the HSC, the City of Banning previously elected to serve in the capacity of the Successor Agency to the Dissolved Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Banning (the “Successor Agency”); and WHEREAS, per HSC § 34177 (o) (1), the Successor Agency is required to prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (the “ROPS”) before each twelve-month fiscal year period; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to HSC § 34180 (g), the Countywide Oversight Board of the County of Riverside (the “Oversight Board”) approval is required for the establishment of each ROPS; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to HSC § 34177 (o) (1), an Oversight Board-approved ROPS 25-26 A and B for the period of July 2025 through June 2026 and it will be submitted to the State Department of Finance, State Controller’s Office and to the County Auditor-Controller not later than February 1, 2025; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to HSC § 34177, the Successor Agency is legally required to continue to make payments due for enforceable obligations; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that the Successor Agency approve the establishment of the Successor Agency’s ROPS 25-26 A and B, which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency staff has prepared an administrative budget for the fiscal period commencing on July 1, 2025 and continuing through June 30, 2026 (“FY 2025-26 Administrative Budget”), substantially in the form shown in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference
WHEREAS, ROPS 25-26 A and B will be submitted to the Oversight Board for approval to ensure that the Successor Agency has the authority to continue to pay its enforceable obligations; and
WHEREAS, all of the prerequisites with respect to the approval of this Resolution have been met.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Successor Agency to the Dissolved Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Banning, as follows:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this 376
Resolution 2024-06 SA

Page 2 of 6 ends

Resolution.

SECTION 2. The Successor Agency’s ROPS 25-26 A and B for the period of July 2025 through June 2026, which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, is approved, inclusive of each enforceable obligation.

SECTION 3. The Successor Agency staff has prepared an administrative budget for the fiscal period commencing on July 1, 2025 and continuing through June 30, 2026 (“FY 2025-26 Administrative Budget”), substantially in the form shown in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 4. The amount requested for enforceable obligation No. 12, the Successor Agency’s Administrative Allowance, is consistent with the provisions of HSC § 34171 (b) and is thus considered fair and reasonable.

SECTION 5. The City Manager, as the Successor Agency’s Executive Director or designee, is authorized to: i) post the ROPS 25-26 A and B on the City’s website, ii) transmit the ROPS 25-26 A and B to the Oversight Board, the State Department of Finance, State Controller’s Office and to the County Auditor-Controller for their review within the timeframe and in the manner prescribed by the HSC; and iii) make ministerial revisions to ROPS 25-26 A and B, which may include, but are not limited to restating the information included within ROPS 25-26 A and B in any format that may be requested by the State Department of Finance, take such other actions and execute such other documents as are necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution, and to implement ROPS 25-26 A and B on behalf of the Successor Agency, including authorizing and causing such payments.

SECTION 6. This Resolution shall take effect upon the date of its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December 2024.

Chairperson
Banning Successor Agency
ATTEST:

Caroline Patton, Secretary
Banning Successor Agency
377
Resolution 2024-06 SA

Page 3 of 6 ends

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Serita Young, Agency Counsel
Richards, Watson & Gershon
378
Resolution 2024-06 SA

Page 4 of 6 ends

CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton, Secretary of the Banning Successor Agency, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2024-06 SA, was duly adopted by the Successor Agency of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 10th day of December 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Caroline Patton, Secretary
Banning Successor Agency
379
Resolution 2024-06 SA

Page 5 of 6 ends

EXHIBIT A

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

DISSOLVED COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

OF THE CITY OF BANNING
RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE 25-26 A and B
(JULY 2025 THROUGH JUNE 2026)
380
Resolution 2024-06 SA

Page 6 of 6 ends

EXHIBIT B

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

DISSOLVED COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

OF THE CITY OF BANNING

ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET
(JULY 2025 THROUGH JUNE 2026)
381
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Summary Filed for the July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026 Period Successor Agency: Banning
County: Riverside
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
25-26A Total
(July -
December)
25-26B Total
(January -
June)
ROPS 25-26
Total
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ - $ - $ - B Bond Proceeds - - -
C Reserve Balance - - -
D Other Funds - - -
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ 1,924,026 $ 513,531 $ 2,437,557 F RPTTF 1,799,026 388,531 2,187,557
G Administrative RPTTF 125,000 125,000 250,000
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ 1,924,026 $ 513,531 $ 2,437,557 Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:

Name Title
Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety
code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and
accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for
the above named successor agency. /s/
Signature Date
382
Banning
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - ROPS Detail July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026

Bonding
Continuing
Disclosure
Services
Merged 16,650 N $1,750 - - - - - $- - - - 1,750 - $1,750 5 Bond
Trustee
Fees
Fees 12/16/
2003
08/01/2037 US Bank Bond Trustee
Fees
Merged 85,675 N $2,750 - - - 2,750 - $2,750 - - - - - $- 12 Successor
Agency
Admin
Admin
Costs
02/01/
2012
08/01/2037 City of
Banning
The amount
requested for
the
Administrative
Allowance is
consistent
with the
provisions of
HSC § 34171
(b).

Merged 250,000 N $250,000 - - - - 125,000 $125,000 - - - - 125,000 $125,000 17 Arbitrage
Analysis
for TABs
Fees 12/16/
2003
08/01/2037 Willdan
Associates
Arbitrage
Analysis for
TABs
Merged 53,000 N $- - - - - - $- - - - - - $-
32 2016
Refunding
TABs
(Interest
Only
Portion)
Bonds
Issued
After 12/
31/10
09/22/
2016
09/01/2037 U.S. Bank,
NA
This item is
for the
interest only
portion of the
debt service
for the 2016
TABs, which
refunded the
2003 and
2007 TABs.

Merged 5,951,178 N $793,057 - - - 406,276 - $406,276 - - - 386,781 - $386,781 33 2016
Refunding
TABs
(Principal
Reduction
Portion)
Bonds
Issued
After 12/
31/10
09/22/
2016
09/01/2037 U.S. Bank,
NA
This item is
for the
principal
reduction
portion of the
debt service
for the 2016
TABs, which
refunded the
2003 and
Merged 20,895,000 N $1,390,000 - - - 1,390,000 - $1,390,000 - - - - - $- 383

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
#
Project
Name
Obligation
Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
25-26
Total
ROPS 25-26A (Jul - Dec)
25-26A
Total
ROPS 25-26B (Jan - Jun)
25-26B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds
RPTTF
Admin
RPTTF
2007 TABs.
384
Banning
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Report of Cash Balances July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation.

A B C D E F G H
ROPS 22-23 Cash Balances
(07/01/22 - 06/30/23)
Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued
on or before
12/31/10
Bonds issued
on or after
01/01/11
Prior ROPS
RPTTF and
Reserve
Balances retained
for future
period(s)
Rent, grants,
interest, etc.

Non-Admin
and Admin
1 Beginning Available Cash Balance (Actual 07/01/22)
RPTTF amount should exclude "A" period distribution
amount.
7,686,612
2 Revenue/Income (Actual 06/30/23)
RPTTF amount should tie to the ROPS 22-23 total
distribution from the County Auditor-Controller
- 2,438,551 Ties to RPTTF actual amount in FY23
3 Expenditures for ROPS 22-23 Enforceable Obligations
(Actual 06/30/23)
7,686,612 2,441,218 Actual FY23 expenditures
4 Retention of Available Cash Balance (Actual 06/30/23) RPTTF amount retained should only include the amounts
distributed as reserve for future period(s)
5 ROPS 22-23 RPTTF Prior Period Adjustment
RPTTF amount should tie to the Agency's ROPS 22-23 PPA
form submitted to the CAC
No entry required
6 Ending Actual Available Cash Balance (06/30/23)
C to F = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4), G = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)
$- $- $- $- $(2,667)
385
Banning
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 25-26) - Notes July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026
Item # Notes/Comments
4 Payments for Continuing Disclosures are paid during the ROPS "B" Cycle. 5 To pay for Bond Trustee Fees
12 The amount requested for the Admin allowance is consistent with the provisions of HSC 24171(b) was approved by the Oversight Board and is thus considered fair and reasonable 17 2016 TABs are paid on the "B" ROPS cycle every 5 years 32 Interest only portion of 2016 Refunding Debt Service 33 Principal portion of 2016 TABs Refunding Debt Service. 386
"EXHIBIT B"
July to Dec Jan to June
ROPS 25-26A ROPS 25-26B
Administrative Cost Allowance HSC § 34171 (b) 125,000 125,000 Administrative Cost Allowance (ROPS 25-26): 125,000 125,000 Successor Agency Indirect Costs:

Salaries & Benefits 114,323 114,323
Projected Operating Expenses 6,016 6,016
Total Indirect Costs 120,339 120,339
Successor Agency Direct Costs:

Professional Services 1,213 1,213
Annual Audit 3,255 3,255
Miscellaneous Expenses 194 194
Total Direct Costs 4,662 4,662
Total Successor Agency Indirect & Direct Costs 125,000 125,000 Admin Costs
Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency for City of Banning

ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET
July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026
Admin Cost Allowance
\\OneDrive-cibanningcaus\Finance\Bonds and Other Long Term Debt\CRA\ROPS\ROPS 25-26\For Council Meeting 12-10-2024\City of Banning SA Admin Budget FY 25- 26Admin ROPS 25-26 387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Stephanie Sirls, Transit Manager
Art Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: December 10, 2024
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2024-188, Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Design-Build Agreement with EFS West for the Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Station for an Additional Amount of $260,549 for a Standby Diesel Generator
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2024-188.

BACKGROUND:

The City owns and operates a CNG fueling facility located at the Corporate Yard (176 E. Lincoln Street).

The facility was commissioned in 2004 and serves the City’s fleet (i.e. transit buses and dump truck) and the Banning Unified School District (BUSD) bus fleet.

At the time of commissioning the CNG facility was available 24 hours a day, 7 days per week to the general public and to other agencies such as, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Caltrans, County of Riverside and Waste Management. Public access has been closed for over five years due to complications with the CNG fueling station.

The existing CNG fueling facility is several years beyond its useful life, is constantly under repair and parts have become increasingly difficult to purchase and in some cases are obsolete. As a result, the City of Banning released a Request for Proposals (RFP 23-034) for a CNG Fueling Station Design-Build project June 5, 2023. On September 12, 2023, the Council unanimously approved the project be awarded to EFS West Inc. of Valencia, California for being the highest ranked firm to complete the design and construction of the City’s new CNG fueling facility.

The scope of work included the completion of the project design, engineering, permits, grading, construction, material, labor, testing, verification, procurement, commissioning, and installation of all equipment. To date, final design is almost 100% complete.

As part of the RFP, the City included three (3) additive bid alternate items. EFS West, Inc. bid on the three items as follows:

Additive Bid Alternate Price
Second CNG Compressor $895,000
Standby Diesel Generator $260,549
Second Fuel Island $278,361
396
City staff has successfully secured additional funding from the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) through the FY 2024/2025 SRTP process for the purchase of the second CNG compressor and the standby diesel generator. Due to an increase in pricing for the second CNG compressor, staff is seeking Council’s authority to add only the standby generator to the agreement at this time. Staff will return at a later date with a request to add the second CNG compressor once staff deems the cost reasonable.

JUSTIFICATION:

A backup generator is needed to ensure the CNG station can continue to operate and dispense fuel to essential vehicles in the event of a power outage or other emergency situation. As outlined in the September 12, 2023 staff report, staff requested and were subsequently granted additional STA funding for a standby diesel generator based on the need for resiliency against service interruptions.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The current adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 includes a budgeted amount of $265,000 in Account No. 610-5800-434.90-56. The project is fully funded by State Transit Assistance (STA) funds as programmed in the City’s approved Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP).

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not adopt Resolution 2024-188 and provide alternative direction to staff. Not approving Resolution 2024-188 would result in not adding a backup power generator to the CNG facility, which provides fuel to the City's transit fleet and others. Additionally, STA funds received for the purpose of funding the addition of an emergency generator may be forfeited.

BUDGETED?:

Yes
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

Yes
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2024-188, EFS West Amendment CNG Station.docx

2. Amend No.1 to the DBA with EFS West.pdf

3. EFS Quote Generator.pdf

4. CC Resolution No. 2023-155 CNG Station EFS.pdf
397
Resolution 2024-188

Page 1 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION 2024-188

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE DESIGN-BUILD AGREEMENT WITH EFS WEST

FOR THE COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS FUELING STATION FOR AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $260,549 FOR A STANDBY DIESEL GENERATOR
WHEREAS, the City owns and operates a Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fueling facility located at the Corporate Yard (176 E. Lincoln Street), which serves the City’s fleet and the Banning Unified School District (BUSD) bus fleet; and
WHEREAS, the existing CNG fueling facility is several years beyond its useful life, has been under constant repair, and parts have become increasingly difficult to procure; and WHEREAS, on September 12, 2023, the City Council awarded the Design-Build project for the new CNG fueling facility to EFS West Inc. following a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP 23-034); and
WHEREAS, as part of the RFP, three additive bid alternate items were included, with EFS West providing a bid for a standby diesel generator in the amount of $260,549; and WHEREAS, a backup generator is essential to ensure the CNG station can continue to operate and dispense fuel during power outages or emergencies and the City successfully secured funding from the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) for the purchase of the standby diesel generator; and
WHEREAS, the City’s current adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 includes a budgeted amount of $265,000 in Account No. 610-5800-434.90-56, which is fully funded by State Transit Assistance (STA) funds.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby approves Amendment No. 1 to the Design-Build Agreement with EFS West for the CNG Fueling Station, authorizing an additional amount of $260,549 for the standby diesel generator.

SECTION 2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations, and transfers related to the Design-Build Agreement with EFS West for the CNG Fueling Station.

SECTION 3. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to make necessary non-substantive changes and to execute Amendment No.1 with EFS West.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. 398
Resolution 2024-188

Page 2 of 4 ends

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December 2024.

Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Serita R. Young, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
399
Resolution 2024-188

Page 3 of 4 ends

CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2024-188, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 10th day of December 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning, California
400
Resolution 2024-188

Page 4 of 4 ends

EXHIBIT A
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement with EFS West
401
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE DESIGN-BUILD AGREMENT (C00803)

FOR COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS (CNG) FUELING STATION

PROJECT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF BANNING AND EFS WEST
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE DESIGN-BUILD AGREEMENT FOR
SERVICES (“Amendment No. 1”) by and between the CITY OF BANNING (“City”) and EFS WEST, a California Corporation (“Design-Builder”) is effective as of this day:
______________.

RECITALS
A. City and Design-Builder entered into that certain Contract dated September 12, 2023 for the purpose of providing a Design Build for the Compressed Natural Gas (“CNG”) Fueling Station Project (“Agreement”) following a Request for Qualifications (RFQ-23- 028) and Request for Proposals (RFP-23-034) to Design-Build Entities for Design and Construction of a CNG Fueling Station in the City of Banning as approved by City Council Resolution ______
B. City and Design-Builder now desire to amend the Agreement to modify the Scope of Services, extend the Term of the Agreement to , and increase the Contract Sum to $[Insert dollar amount]].

The Parties therefore agree follows:

1. Amended Terms. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1.1 The Scope of Services as set forth in Section 1.1 of and Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby amended to include the Services set forth in Attachment 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

1.2 The maximum compensation for the Services performed pursuant to this Amendment No. 1 shall not exceed Two Hundred Sixty Thousand Five Hundred Forty-Nine Dollars ($260,549.00) thereby increasing the Contract Sum, as set forth in Section 5.1 of the Agreement, to Three Million Eight Hundred Three Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Two Dollars ($3,803,562.00).

1.3 The Term of the Agreement, as set forth in Section 4.2 of the Agreement, is hereby extended as follows:

4.2 Contract Times
B. Phase 2 – Completion Stage: June 30, 2025
C. Phase 3 - Removal of Existing Facilities Stage: June 30, 2025 unless sooner terminated or extended as provided in the Agreement.

2. Miscellaneous Provisions
402

2.1 Continued Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No.1, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 1, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this Amendment No. 1 and the provisions of the Agreement, this Amendment No. 1 shall control.

2.2 Consideration for Amendment. The parties hereby agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the modifications to the Agreement set forth in this Amendment No. 1.

2.3 Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 1, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 1, and (iv) entering into this Amendment No. 1 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound.

2.4 Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument.

2.5 Electronic Signatures. Each Party may adopt as its signature an electronic identification consisting of a symbol or code that is affixed to or contained in each document transmitted by such Party (“electronic signature”). The Parties hereto herby agree that electronic signatures are acceptable, shall have the same force and effect under the law as original wet signatures, and shall be sufficient to verify that the Parties have executed this Agreement and such other documents transmitted by the Parties.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
403
The Parties are signing this Amendment No. 1 on the date stated in the introductory clause.

CITY OF BANNING DESIGN-BUILDER: EFS WEST
Douglas Schulze,
City Manager
NAME:

TITLE:

City Council Approval: _______________ NAME:

TITLE:

ATTEST:

Caroline Patton
Administrative City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Richards, Watson & Gershon
Serita R. Young
City Attorney
NOTE: PROOF OF AUTHORITY TO BIND CONTRACTING PARTY REQUIRED.

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE

BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO DESIGN-BUILDER’S BUSINESS ENTITY.
404
PLANNING • DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION
28472 Constellation Road, Valencia, CA 91355
661.705.8200 • fax 661-775-9623
CSLB License # 826003 DIR# 1000011646
June 25, 2024 Rev1 October 17, 2024
City of Banning
Subject Add Alternative #3
Gentlemen:

EFS West is pleased to submit this proposal showing the cost break down for one alternative for the design build CNG upgrade project for the City of Banning CA.

Our bid proposal included the following alternative
Alternative #3 Purchase and installation of 400 kw Diesel Generator with MTS switch to power one compressor during a power outage for $260,549.

1. Added Design, Engineering, and permitting requirements. $13,100

2. 400amp Generator, additional electrical controls, and fuel for testing $168,925

3. Costs for additional material including electrical, mechanical, and crane services. $26,138

4. Costs for additional labor for installation, testing, and commissioning 11,820

5. 15% Overhead & Profit
$32,997

6. Insurance and Bonds
$7,569
If you have any questions on our proposal, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (661) 705-8264 / 818-235-6283 or at [email protected] Sincerely,
EFS West Inc.

Von Regli
Sr Project Manager
ATTACHMENT "1"
405
PLANNING • DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION
28472 Constellation Road, Valencia, CA 91355
661.705.8200 • fax 661-775-9623
CSLB License # 826003 DIR# 1000011646
June 25, 2024 Rev1 October 17, 2024
City of Banning
Subject Add Alternative #3
Gentlemen:

EFS West is pleased to submit this proposal showing the cost break down for one alternative for the design build CNG upgrade project for the City of Banning CA.

Our bid proposal included the following alternative
Alternative #3 Purchase and installation of 400 kw Diesel Generator with MTS switch to power one compressor during a power outage for $260,549.

1. Added Design, Engineering, and permitting requirements. $13,100

2. 400amp Generator, additional electrical controls, and fuel for testing $168,925

3. Costs for additional material including electrical, mechanical, and crane services. $26,138

4. Costs for additional labor for installation, testing, and commissioning 11,820

5. 15% Overhead & Profit
$32,997

Von Regli
Sr Project Manager
406
RESOLUTION 2023-155

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA,

AWARDING A DESIGN-BUILD AGREEMENT TO EFS WEST FOR THE

COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS ( CNG) FUELING STATION IN THE AMOUNT OF 3,543,013 AND APPROVING A 10% CONTINGENCY FOR A TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET OF $ 3,897,314 AND APPROVING AMENDMENT 3 WITH STV INCORPORATED FOR SUPPORT SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 109,000 WHEREAS, the City owns and operates a compressed natural gas (CNG) fueling facility located at the Corporate Yard ( 176 E. Lincoln Street). The facility was commissioned in 2004 and serves the City's fleet and the Banning Unified School District BUSD) bus fleet; and
WHEREAS, the CNG fueling facility is several years beyond it's useful life, is constantly under repair and parts are becoming increasingly difficult to purchase. If the facility were to go down the City's CNG fleet would have to travel to either Redlands, Moreno Valley or Palm Springs to refuel; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department, Transit Division, recently completed a zero- emission bus (ZEB) transition study to create a plan for a 100% zero-emission fleet by 2040 as required by the Innovative Clean Transit ( ICT) regulation enacted by the California Air Resources Board ( CARB). The ZEB transition study indicates that the City will continue to have CNG vehicles until 2039; and
WHEREAS, the City of Banning entered into a Professional Services Agreement with STV Incorporated ( STV) on June 25, 2021. STV's scope of work was to update an existing set of bridging documents ( 30% design) for a design- build solicitation to construct a new CNG fueling station. STV's engineer was the engineer of record for the original set of bridging documents developed in 2019; and
WHEREAS, a Request for Proposals ( RFP-23-034) was released on June 5, 2023.

A mandatory pre-proposal meeting was held on June 15, 2023 to go over the scope of work, deadlines and to answer any questions from prospective bidders. As a result of the RFP, the City received two proposals; and
WHEREAS, both proposals were evaluated and scored based on qualifications of the primary team member, the team, statement of understanding, responsiveness and price proposal. As a result the highest scored proposal was submitted by EFS West, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, staff has recommended that award of a Design-Build Agreement to EFS West, Inc. in the amount of $3,543,013; and
Resolution 2023- 155

Page 1 of 6 ends

407
WHEREAS, staff has also recommends the approval of Amendment 3 in the amount of $109 ,000 to the agreement with STV for support services during the design and construction phases of the new CNG fueling facility ; and WHEREAS, the total project budget is $ 4,006 ,314, which includes a 10% contingency for the construction phase; and
WHEREAS, the total project budget is currently budgeted in the approved budget for fiscal year 2023/2024 and is fully funded by State Transit Assistance funds programmed via the Riverside County Transportation Commission approved Short Range Transit Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. City Council approves a Design-Build Agreement for the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Fueling Station to EFS West , Inc. of Valencia , California in the amount of $3 ,543,013 and approving a 10% contingency in the amount of $354,301 for a total project budget of $3,897,314 and rejecting all other bids.

SECTION 2 . City Council approves Amendment 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with STV Incorporated for support services in the Amount of $109,000.

SECTION 3. City Council authorizes the City Manager or his designee to make necessary budget adjustments, appropriations and transfers related to the Design-Build Agreement with EFS West, Inc. for the CNG Fueling Station and to approve change orders within the 10% contingency .

SECTION 4 . City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute the Design-Build Agreement with EFS West , Inc. for CNG Fueling Station and Amendment 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with STV Incorporated.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of September 2023.

Resolution 2023-155

Page 2 of 6 ends

City of Banning
408
ATTEST:

Caroline Patton , D
City of Banning

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL CONTENT:

Serit~~~----
Richards , Watson & Gershon
Resolut ion 2023- 155

Page 3 of 6 ends

409
CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton , Deputy City Clerk of the City of Banning , California , do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2023-155 , was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning , California , at a regular meeting thereof held on the 12th day of September 2023 by the following vote , to wit:

AYES : Flynn , Gonales , Minjares , and Wallace .

NOES :

ABSENT: Sanchez .

ABSTAIN:

Resolution 2023-155

Page 4 of 6 ends

Caroline Patton , Dep City Clerk
City of Bann ing , Califo rnia
410

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Nate Smith, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Art Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: December 10, 2024
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2024-189, Adopting the Water Supply Verification for Tentative Tract Map 37388 (Atwell Phase 2B) RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2024-189.

BACKGROUND:

California Government Code §66473.7 requires affirmative written verification from the water purveyor of the public water system that sufficient water supplies are available for projects meeting certain criteria.

In the case of Tentative Tract No. 37388, the estimated number of residential units is 530, which is over the 500 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs) threshold requiring written verification of sufficient water supplies.

California Water Code §10910 requires the preparation of a water supply assessment, which provides substantial evidence in support of the written verification. A water supply assessment (WSA) was previously prepared for the entire Atwell SP (previously Butterfield SP) and approved by City Council with final modifications in 2011.

In addition to the WSA prepared for the entire SP, each individual tract map with water demands in excess of 500 equivalent dwelling units (EDUs) requires the preparation of a Water Supply Verification, pursuant to California Senate Bill 221 (Chapter 642, Statutes of 2001) and Government Code §66473.7(a)(1). If the water demand of the proposed project was accounted for in the most recent Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the water supply verification may draw upon the information and analysis in the UWMP previously prepared by the City. The City prepared and adopted its 2020 UWMP as of June 2021, and the prepared Water Supply Verification relied on the information within the City’s UWMP.

The Water Supply Verification, prepared by the City's consultant (West & Associates Engineering, Inc.) demonstrates that the City’s water supply will meet the water demands of the proposed Project. The combined indoor and outdoor water demands for Tentative Tract No. 37388 are estimated at 298 acrefeet per year. For the years 2025 through 2045, the City has a projected water supply of 14,398 acrefeet per year. In addition, the City of Banning maintains a storage account in the Beaumont Basin, currently estimated at 47,650 acre-feet. It is anticipated that recycled water recharge and conversions to non-potable irrigation will increase potable availability by 929 acre-feet per year in 2030 to 2,307 acrefeet per year in 2045. The City produced a total of approximately 7,843 acre-feet to meet demands during the 2022 calendar year.
411
JUSTIFICATION:

The WSV prepared for Tentative Tract No. 37388 is subject to and meets the requirements of the California Water and Government Codes.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There are no costs from the City’s existing budget involved with the above action, however the proposed development will generate operational and impact fee revenues for the City’s water funds.

ALTERNATIVES:

Reject Resolution 2024-189 and provide further direction to staff. If the resolution is not approved, further development of the Atwell Specific Plan Phase 2B would not be permitted.

BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

No
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2024-189, Water Supply Verification Atwell 2B.docx

2. Exb. A WSV TTM 37388 (ATWELL PHASE 2B).pdf
412
Resolution 2024-189

Page 1 of 5 ends

RESOLUTION 2024-189

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 37388 (ATWELL SP PHASE 2B)
WHEREAS, the City is the Water Purveyor for the water service area of the City of Banning; and
WHEREAS, a Water Supply Verification (WSV) has been prepared by the City’s consultant West & Associates Engineering, Inc for Tentative Tract No. 37388 (Project); and WHEREAS, the proposed Project is subject to California Senate Bill 221 (Chapter 642, Statutes of 2001) requiring a WSV because it is a Subdivision, pursuant to Government Code §66473.7(a)(1); and
WHEREAS, the WSV must be approved by the governing body of the public water system, the City of Banning; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared and adopted its 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) as of June 8, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the City approved a final version of the Water Supply Assessment (WSA) in December 2011 for the Butterfield Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the WSV prepared for the Project, attached and incorporated herein by this reference, relies on the information within the Butterfield Specific Plan WSA and the City’s adopted 2020 UWMP that indicates the City will have a sufficient water supply during the period from 2020 to 2045 during normal, single, and multiple dry years; and WHEREAS, the City’s water supply will meet the water demands of this proposed Project, existing uses, and other future uses.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby makes the following findings related to the WSV:

The City’s adopted 2020 UWMP, which is incorporated by this reference, identified three sources of water supply to meet projected water demands within the City’s service area:
groundwater, recycled water, and SWP water. As described in the City’s 2020 UWMP, a conservative approach was used to determine the availability of each of these water supply sources. As documented in the City's 2020 UWMP, the City has existing water entitlements and rights to meet future demands. Through an established practice of groundwater management utilizing several storage units, and by exercising its right under the Beaumont Basin Judgment, sufficient water supplies are available. In addition, the City has committed capital resources and planned investments in various water programs and facilities to serve all of its existing and planned customers, while replenishing ground water supplies. No shortages are anticipated within the City's service area in average/normal year, single dry year, and multiple dry year scenarios for the next twenty (20) years. 413
Resolution 2024-189

Page 2 of 5 ends

As of 2020, the City’s water supply is obtained from five (5) storage units of the San Gorgonio Pass Groundwater Sub-basin: Banning, Banning Bench, Banning Canyon, Cabazon, and Beaumont Storage Units. For the years 2025 through 2045, the City has a projected water supply of 14,398 acre-ft/yr.

In addition to the above yearly water supplies, the City maintains a storage account in the Beaumont Storage Unit, currently estimated by the Beaumont Basin Watermaster at 47,650 acre-ft.

In calendar year 2022, the City’s water demand was 7,843 acre-ft/yr. By 2045, an increase to 12,688 acre-ft/yr is projected. In addition, it is anticipated that the development of tertiary-level recycled water in the amount of 929 acre-ft/yr will be available by 2030 to offset potable water currently used for landscape irrigation.

Tentative Tract No. 37388 consists of 530 residential dwelling units along with park and open space areas on 109.9 acres located in the City of Banning. This project will have an estimated total annual average water demand of 298 acre-ft/yr. Water demand estimates are based on water demand factors from the Butterfield SP Water Supply Assessment.

Based on the above findings and the substantial evidence in the record including the WSA, WSV, staff report, and other documents incorporated therein, the City Council hereby finds that the public water system’s total projected water supplies available during normal, single dry and multiple dry water years during a 20-year projection will meet the projected water demand associated with the proposed Project, in addition to the public water system’s existing and planned future uses, including agricultural and manufacturing uses.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the Water Supply Verification, dated November 2024, for Tentative Tract No. 37388.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December 2024.

Mayor
City of Banning
ATTEST:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning
414
Resolution 2024-189

Page 3 of 5 ends

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Serita R. Young, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
415
Resolution 2024-189

Page 4 of 5 ends

CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2024-189, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 10th day of December 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning, California
416
Resolution 2024-189

Page 5 of 5 ends

EXHIBIT A
Water Supply Verification
417
Water Supply Verification
Atwell Specific Plan Phase 2B
(Tract Map 37388)
Developer: Tri Pointe Homes
Corona, CA
November, 2024
418
Water Supply Verification
Atwell Specific Plan Phase 2B
(Tract Map 37388)
City of Banning, CA
Public Works Department
99 East Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220
(951) 922-3130
Developer
Tri Pointe Homes -
Inland Empire Division Office
1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 600
Corona, CA 92879
(951) 397-0201
Report Prepared by:

West & Associates Engineering, Inc.
78 Anacapa Ct
Foothill Ranch, CA 92610
November, 2024
419
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TOC - 1
WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: Executive Summary
SECTION Page

1.1 Scope of Water Supply Verification ...................................................................................2 Section 2: Proposed Development
SECTION Page

2.1 Development Location .......................................................................................................4

2.2 Development Water Demands ..........................................................................................5

2.3 2020 UWMP Projections ...................................................................................................5 Section 3: Water Supply
SECTION Page

3.1 Water Supply Sources.........................................................................................................9

3.2 Groundwater Production..................................................................................................10

3.3 Description of Groundwater Basins..................................................................................12

3.4 Projected Groundwater Supply ........................................................................................16

3.5 Groundwater Management..............................................................................................18

3.6 Imported Water ................................................................................................................19

3.7 Banning Water Canyon ....................................................................................................20

3.8 Recycled/Non-Potable Water ...........................................................................................21 Section 4: Water Demand
SECTION Page

4.1 Recent Water Use ............................................................................................................24

4.2 Recent Water Use by Sector ............................................................................................24

4.3 Water Demand Projections ..............................................................................................26 Section 5: Water Supply vs. Demand Analysis
SECTION Page

5.1 City Supply Reliability .......................................................................................................29

5.2 Drought Risk Assessment..................................................................................................30

5.3 Ensuring Adequate Supply ...............................................................................................31 Section 6: Water-Use Efficiency Strategies
SECTION Page

6.1 Development Conservation Measures .............................................................................41 420
TOC - 2 ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B

TABLE OF CONTENTS
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
Section 7: Summary
SECTION Page

7.1 Conclusion and Recommendations ..................................................................................46 Appendices
Appendix A Council Resolution Adopting Water Supply Verification Appendix B Excerpts from the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (Excerpts from Sections 2, 3, 4, & 6)
Appendix C Beaumont Basin Judgment
Appendix D Excerpts from 2018 Integrated Master Plan
(Table 3.5 & Figure 6.11)
Appendix E California Government Code Section 66473.7
(Water Supply Verification)
List of Tables
1 Atwell Phase 2B Development Water Demands
2 Recent Groundwater Production (AFY)
3 Banning Annual Storage Consolidation - Beaumont Storage Unit 4 Projected Water Supply Availability (AF)
5 Historic SGPWA Water Purchases (AF)
6 Projected SGPWA Water Purchases (AF)
7 Potential Recycled Water Users
8 City’s Recent Water Use
9 Recent Water Use by Sector (AF)
10 Projected Water Use by Sector – With Development
11 Normal Water Year (AF) – With Development
12 Single Dry Year (AF) – With Development
13 Multiple Dry Years (2023-2027) (AF) – With Development 14 Multiple Dry Years (2028-2032) (AF) – With Development 15 Multiple Dry Years (2033-2037) (AF) – With Development 16 Multiple Dry Years (2038-2042) (AF) – With Development 17 Multiple Dry Years (2043-2047) (AF) – With Development 421
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TOC - 3
WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
List of Figures
1 Location Map/Aerial Photo
2 Proposed Planning Areas (Atwell Phase 2B)
3 Proposed Land Use Designations (Atwell Phase 2B)
4 Proposed Site Plan (Development Site Plan)
5 Existing & Proposed Groundwater Wells Adjacent to Proposed Phase 2B Development 6 Groundwater Storage Units
7 Current Water Demand by Sector (2022)
8 Projected Water Demand by Sector – With Development (in 2045) 422
TOC - 4 ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B

TABLE OF CONTENTS
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
423

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
1 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Secon 1: Execuve Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide an evalua$on of the adequacy of total exis$ng and future water supplies available to serve the proposed Specific Plan Phase 2B (Development) of the “Atwell” Project, which will encompass tenta$ve Tract Number 37388. This WSV an$cipates adequate water will be available to the Development during normal, single dry, and mul$ple dry water years during a 20-year projec$on. A Water Supply Verifica$on (WSV) is mandated by California Government Code Sec$on 66473.7 for a subdivision that includes proposed residen$al development of more than 500 dwelling units, which applies to this Development.

This WSV relies in part on the Water Supply Assessment (WSA) for the Bu>erfield Specific Plan (“Atwell" Project) that RBF Consul$ng prepared in June 2011 along with part of the DraB Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and later modified in December 2011 by Sec$on 4.1 of the Final EIR. This fulfilled the requirements of SB 610 when the Specific Plan was approved and the EIR was cer$fied.
424
2 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION

1.1 SCOPE OF WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION (WSV)
The City of Banning Public Works Department provides domes$c water services to the City of Banning (City) and por$ons of unincorporated Riverside County located southwesterly of the City limits. The City of Banning would provide water to all por$ons of the Development. This WSV documents sources of water supply, quan$fies water demands, evaluates drought impacts, and provides a comparison of water supply and demand, and will serves as the basis for the City to determine if adequate water will be available during normal, single dry, and mul$ple dry water years during a 20-year projec$on to meet the projected water demand associated with the Development. The Development is described in more detail later in Secon 2.

The scope of this WSV is defined under California Government Code Sec$on 66473.7, which includes the following elements:

1. 66473.7(b): The City shall include as a condi$on in any tenta$ve map that includes a subdivision a requirement that a sufficient water supply shall be available. Proof of the availability of a sufficient water supply shall be based on wri>en verifica$on from the applicable public water system within ninety (90) days of a request.

2. 66473.7(c): The verifica$on shall be supported by substan$al evidence, which may include the City’s most recently adopted Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), adopted pursuant to Water Code Sec$on 10610.
a. The en$re Atwell Project water demands were accounted for as part of the 2015 and 2020 UWMPs, therefore this WSV will verify those findings.

This WSV does not specifically address funding of new or exis$ng supplies. To serve the Development, the Developer (Tri-Pointe Homes) will be required to fund the acquisi$on of new supplemental supplies, including the treatment and distribu$on thereof. The extent of addi$onal funding will be determined by the City and may take the form of new connec$on (capacity) fees or separate, miscellaneous charges. The City will also prepare a “Will Serve Le>er”, which will declare that the City will provide a water service connec$on(s) to the proposed Development.

The Will Serve Le>er will be issued upon payment of all fees by the Developer. 425

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
3 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Secon 2: Proposed Development
The Atwell Specific Plan Phase 2B Development has a total project area of 119.9 acres and will consist of 530 single-family residen$al lots, six (6) parking lots, 26 open space and le>ered lots, private common driveways, and public streets, all within the Bu>erfield Specific Plan (now “Atwell" Project).

As outlined in the Bu>erfield Specific Plan (“Atwell” Project), the Phase 2B Development establishes ten (10) Planning Areas, including: 14, 15A, 15B, 16A, 16B, 21, 32, 33, 35B and 48B.

As shown in Figure 2, six (6) pf the Planning Areas {14, 15A, 15B, 16A, 16B, and 48B} are designated for residen$al use, and four (4) of the Planning Areas {21, 32, 33, and 35B} are designated for open space use (parks, etc.). The Planning Areas will be designed, permi>ed, and constructed over the course of available funding for the development. Currently, Planning Areas 15A and 15B are currently being constructed.
426
4 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION

2.1 DEVELOPMENT LOCATION
The Phase 2B por$on of the Atwell Project is located in the westerly por$on of the City, within the southeasterly por$on of the Atwell Project, just north of Phase 2A. It will encompass tenta$ve Tract Number 37388. The Atwell Project is located north of Interstate 10 and west of Highland Home Road, and is bounded on the west by the City’s boundary (Highland Springs Avenue). A Loca$on Map/Aerial Photo of the development is included in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Locaon Map/Aerial Photo
There are three (3) different land use designa$ons of the Phase 2B por$on of the Atwell Project, including Low-Density Residen$al, Medium-Density Residen$al, High-Density Residen$al, and Open Pace/Parks. The proposed land use designa$ons are indicated in Figure 3. 427

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
5 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024

2.2 DEVELOPMENT WATER DEMANDS
This WSV will verify the findings of the 2020 UWMP that determined sufficient water supply of the City to serve Phase 2B of the Atwell Project during normal, dry-year, and mul$ple-dry year scenarios through 2045. The projected water demands from Phase 2B Development are shown in Table 1 below:

Table 1: Atwell Phase 2B Development Water Demands
Land Use Acres
(See Figure 3)
Water
Demand Factor
(GPD/Acre) 1
Total Daily
Water Demand
(Gal)
Total Yearly
Water Demand
(Acre-Feet)
Low-Density Residen$al 39.5 2,334 92,193 103
Medium-Density Residen$al 22 2,763 60,786 68
High-Density Residen$al 31.4 3,053 95,864 107
Open Pace – Parks 17 1,019 17,323 19
Total 109.9 --- 266,166 298
1: Source: City of Banning 2018 Integrated Master Plan (IMP), Table 3.5 As indicated in Table 1 above, Phase 2B of the Atwell Project is expected to create an overall water demand of approximately 298 AF.

2.3 2020 UWMP PROJECTIONS
The City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (2020 UWMP) accounted for two (2) proposed developments, which include the Atwell Project (formerly “Bu>erfield Specific Plan”) and Rancho San Gorgonio Specific Plan.

The 2020 UWMP projected the City's water use for 2025-2045 broken down by sector (2020 UWMP Table 6.6). Two (2) proposed developments (totaling 8,300 connec$ons) were added to the es$mate for 2045. Three (3) persons per connec$on mul$plied by 8,300 connec$ons (totaling 24,900 persons) amounts to a Citywide total of 66,400 persons for 2045. Distributed annually 428
6 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
over 25 years, this amounts to a popula$on growth of 1,411 persons per year for 25 years, or about 316 acre-feet (AF) of increase in annual water demand, or 7,900 AF of total increase in water demand from 2020. The annual and overall increases will be offset by water use efficiency, resul$ng in only 4,000 AF of total increase in Citywide water demand at build-out condi$ons, for an average annual growth of 160 AF (Citywide). As indicated in Table 1, the total Phase 2B water demands (298 AF) are well within the UWMP projec$ons for ul$mate (build-out) water demands.

The 2020 UWMP determined that if water use efficiency increases, the City can expect to have an adequate water supply in future years. This is in spite of a projected popula$on growth over the next 25 years. Therefore, because the Development’s water demand was included in the 2020 UWMP, no further analysis would be required to determine if the City would have adequate water supply in future years to accommodate Phase 2B of the Development. Notwithstanding, the remaining por$ons of this WSV provide background informa$on on the City’s water system, comparison of water supply to water demand, and conclusions/recommenda$ons for the City. 429

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
7 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Figure 2: Proposed Planning Areas (Atwell Phase 2B)
Atwell
Phase 2B
430
8 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
Figure 3: Proposed Land Use Designaons (Atwell Phase 2B) Figure 4: Proposed Site Plan (Development Site Plan)
431

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
9 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Secon 3: Water Supply
The City’s water is obtained en$rely from local groundwater basins through nineteen (19) potable groundwater wells, one (1) non-potable groundwater well, and three (3) co-owned wells with the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District (BCVWD). Both imported water and surface water are used to recharge the groundwater aquifers. This Secon describes the current and projected water resources available to the City for this WSA.

3.1 WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
The City is within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley Hydrologic Unit, which encompasses several groundwater basins, including the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin (Basin), within which the City is located. Several large subbasins, the boundaries of which are generally defined by fault lines that restrict the lateral flow of water, underlie the Basin. The Basin extends from Banning easterly to the Salton Sea.
432
10 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
The City is underlain by the San Gorgonio Pass Subbasin (SGP Subbasin) por$on of the overall Basin. The SGP Subbasin is further divided into water “storage units” which are not totally independent from each other. The City relies on the following five (5) storage units as sources of groundwater storage supply:
• Beaumont Storage Unit (Beaumont Basin);
• West Banning Storage Unit;
• Cabazon Storage Unit.
• Banning Bench Storage Unit;
• Banning Water Canyon Storage Unit
The loca$on of the Storage Units is shown on Figures 5 and 6.

3.2 GROUNDWATER PRODUCTION
As men$oned previously, the City owns and maintains nineteen (19) potable groundwater wells, one (1) non-potable groundwater well, and three (3) addi$onal wells with BCVWD, for a total of twenty-three (23) wells. The pumping capacity of these wells is just over 14,000 AFY. However, this mechanical pumping capacity is actually limited to the safe yields and/or the adjudicated rights of the subbasins. The ground water produc$on for the previous 7-years (2016 to 2022) is contained in Table 2.

To accommodate the proposed developments in the City (including the Atwell Project), the City is planning to redrill or add new well(s), including Well M7, Well M12, and a new well (Well C8) within the overall Atwell Project (or within Phase 2B of the Atwell Project). The exis$ng and future/poten$al wells are shown in Figure 5.

Since any new wells would be located in the Beaumont Storage Unit (Basin), which is an adjudicated basin, the City would need to consider opera$on of the wells such that the combined pumping volume of all wells in the Beaumont Basin does not exceed the City’s adjudicated limits (See Secon 3.3: Beaumont Storage Unit).
433

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
11 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Figure 5: Exisng & Proposed Groundwater Wells Adjacent to Proposed Phase 2B Development Table 2: Recent Groundwater Producon (AFY)
Basin Name 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beaumont Storage Unit (Basin) 1,762 1,469 2,266 2,118 2,702 3,604 3,578 West Banning Storage Unit 1,396 1,967 1,957 1,326 1,719 947 809 Cabazon Storage Unit 1,211 685 1,006 526 0 210 541
Banning Bench Storage Unit 237 87 354 431 470 445 98
Banning Water Canyon Storage Unit 2,428 3,367 2,342 2,826 3,705 2,890 2,817 Total 7,035 7,576 7,924 7,226 8,596 8,096 7,843
Source: City of Banning, Groundwater Extrac(on Annual Reports 2016 through 2022. Amount of groundwater pumped for Beaumont Basin includes water received from Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District, through three (3) Co-Owned Wells with the City of Banning, that directly pump from the Beaumont Basin.

434
12 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
Hexavalent Chromium (Chromium-6)
Hexavalent chromium is a heavy metal that has been used in industrial applica$ons and found naturally occurring throughout the environment. While chromium can exist in a nontoxic, trivalent form, the hexavalent form has been shown to be carcinogenic and toxic to the liver (OEHHA, 2011). Hexavalent chromium is among the chemicals known to the state to cause cancer [Title 27, California Code of Regula$ons, Sec$on 27001], pursuant to California's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 ("Proposi$on 65"). The hexavalent chromium MCL is

0.010 mg/L or 10 µg/L effec$ve on October 1, 2024 and water systems with 10,000 or greater service connec$ons are required to comply by October 1, 2026, which applies to the City.

The City recently tested for hexavalent chromium at nineteen (19) out of its twenty-one (21) groundwater wells, and plan to test the remaining two (2) wells (4 and 5) in the near future. Wells 4 and 5 were down during the tes$ng period. Eleven (11) wells tested near or above the new MCL. Therefore, the City plans to construct several Treatment Facili$es throughout its service area. New well C8 will provide further water supply to the Atwell Project, which was recently drilled and plans for equipping the well are underway. The City is currently reviewing the poten$al to treat well C8 and exis$ng wells C2, C4, and M3 at a cluster loca$on currently referred to as the Foothill West Cluster Treatment Facility. New well C8 and the planned Foothill West Cluster Treatment Facility are located adjacent to the Development, as shown in Figure 5.

3.3 DESCRIPTION OF GROUNDWATER BASINS
The following basin descrip$ons are based on the Water Supply Verifica(on Tenta(ve Tract No. 37390, KWC Engineers. Inc., November 1, 2019 and the 2020 UWMP.

Beaumont Storage Unit (Beaumont Basin)
• The Beaumont Storage Unit, also referred to as the Beaumont Basin, is located in San Gorgonio Pass, a low-relief highland that is bordered on the north by the San Bernardino Mountains, on the southeast by the San Jacinto Mountains, and on the west by the San Timoteo Badlands. Surface sediment in the basin and the lowlands consist of unconsolidated and semi-consolidated Quaternary alluvium. Surrounding the alluvial sediments are semi-consolidated rocks of the San Timoteo Forma$on and igneous and 435

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
13 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
metamorphic rocks of the San Jacinto and San Bernardino Mountains. The unconsolidated Quaternary alluvium and upper por$on of the underlying San Timoteo Forma$on cons$tute the water-bearing aquifer.
• The boundaries of the basin are based on faults that form barriers to subsurface flow.

Major faults in the area include the Banning and Cherry Valley faults, which form the northern boundary of the basin.
• The total surface area is approximately 12,480 acres (19.5 square miles). • Groundwater occurs at depth in the Quaternary alluvium and the San Timoteo Forma$on. • The basin is replenished by infiltra$on of precipita$on, subsurface flow across faults, return flow from irriga$on and sep$c, and ar$ficial recharge. • The basin discharges via groundwater produc$on, subsurface flow across faults, rising water in San Timoteo Creek, and evapotranspira$on.
• The safe yield is 6,700 AFY based on 2013 Reevalua(on of the Beaumont Basin Safe Yield, dated April 3, 2015.
• The City operates four (4) groundwater produc$on wells designated: C2, C3, C4, and M3 and an addi$onal non-opera$ng well M9. The four (4) ac$ve wells have a combined nominal capacity of 4,650 gpm.
• The City also co-owns with BCVWD three (3) groundwater produc$on wells designated:
24, 25, and 26. The three (3) co-owned wells have a combined nominal capacity of 6,800 gpm, half of which is allo>ed to the City.
• The City’s total nominal pumping capacity in the Beaumont Basin is 8,050 gpm.

The Beaumont Storage Unit (Basin) is an adjudicated basin established by the S(pula(on for Entry of Judgment Adjudica(ng Groundwater Rights in the Beaumont Basin (see Appendix C). Pursuant to the Judgment, the Court appointed a five (5) member Watermaster Commi>ee, consis$ng of representa$ves from each of the five (5) appropriators, which include City of Banning, City of Beaumont, Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District, South Mesa Water Company, and Yucaipa Valley Water District. At the end of calendar year 2023, the City had approximately 47,650 AF in its storage account, based on the Beaumont Basin Watermaster Consolidated Annual Report. The City of Banning is permi>ed to store up to 80,000 AF in the Beaumont Basin. Table 3 indicates the City of Banning’s storage in the basin for the past 8-years according to the Beaumont Basin Watermaster Consolidated Annual Reports 2016 through 2023. 436
14 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
Figure 6: Groundwater Storage Units (Subbasins of San Gorgonio Pass Basin) City Boundaries
Development
Beaumont Storage
Unit (Basin)
437

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
15 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Table 3: Banning Annual Storage Consolidaon - Beaumont Storage Unit Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Storage in AFY 49,990 51,960 52,320 51,737 50,889 48,778 46,570 47,650 (1) Source: Beaumont Basin Watermaster Consolidated Annual Reports On an annual basis, the Watermaster determines the amount of groundwater to which each producer is en$tled from the Beaumont Basin without incurring a replenishment obliga$on. The City of Banning per Exhibit C S(pula(on for Entry of Judgment Adjudica(ng Groundwater Rights in the Beaumont Basin (see Appendix D) is en$tled to 31.43% of the unused overlying produc$on in the Beaumont Basin. Quan$$es to which the City is en$tled but does not pump can be credited to the City's storage account.

West Banning Storage Unit
• The total surface area is approximately 2,489 acres (3.9 square miles). • The area is underlain by alluvial sediments, with bedrock occurring to the north in the San Bernardino Mountains.
• The City operates four (4) groundwater produc$on wells designated: Wells C5, M7, M10, and M11 with a combined nominal pumping capacity of 2,650 gpm. • The City lost Well M12, due to a collapse and has recently completed the drilling, development, and tes$ng phase for its replacements (i.e., well M12A). Well M12A is expected to have a nominal pumping capacity of 400 gpm.

Banning Bench Storage Unit
• The total surface area is approximately 3,573 acres (5.9 square miles). • The area is underlain by alluvial sediments, with bedrock occurring to the north in the San Bernardino Mountains.
• The safe yield is 1,130 AFY.
• The average thickness is 600 feet.
• The es$mated capacity is 240,000 AF, according to the WSA18. • The City operates three (3) groundwater produc$on wells designated: Wells 1, 2, and 3 with a combined nominal pumping capacity of 3,650 gpm.
438
16 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
Banning Water Canyon Storage Unit
• The Banning Water Canyon Storage Unit is located north of the Banning Bench Storage Unit • The total surface area is approximately 1,058 acres (1.7 square miles). • The canyon bo>om comprises alluvium, and the canyon sides are bedrock. • The safe yield is 4,070 AFY.
• The average thickness is 161 feet.
• The es$mated capacity is 13,500 AF. According to the WSA28 • Addi$onal recharge occurs through the diversion of Whitewater River drainage into Banning Water Canyon via the San Gorgonio Flume.
• There are eight (8) ac$ve wells designated 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 with a combined nominal pumping capacity of 8,600 gpm.

Cabazon Storage Unit
• The Cabazon Storage Unit is located near the eastern boundary of the City, southeast of the West Banning Storage Unit and the Banning Bench Storage Unit. • The total surface area is approximately 17,215 acres (26.9 square miles). • The average thickness is 350 feet.
• The es$mate storage is 1,000,000 AF.
• The safe yield is 5,265 AFY.
• There is one (1) ac$ve well designated: C6 with a nominal pumping capacity of 900 gpm. • Non-potable Well NP-1 (aka R1) has been equipped and is expected to be in service in 2026 once the non-potable distribu$on system is complete.

3.4 PROJECTED GROUNDWATER SUPPLY
As stated previously in this chapter, due to its reliance on local groundwater sources, the City has not experienced any actual supply deficiencies, even during mul$ple drought years. According to the 2020 UWMP, “the City is confident that water supplies are adequate to meet demands for all weather condi(ons through 2045.” With the local groundwater reserves available to the City during the prepara$on of the 2020 UWMP, which accounted for the Development, the City did 439

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
17 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
not an$cipate any water shortages. This WSV will review and analyze supply and demand data for the years subsequent to the 2020 UWMP and prior to prepara$on of this WSV (2021 through 2023). Table 4 below shows the City’s projected water supplies and available volumes, based off the values reflected in Appendix E of 2020 UWMP, DWR Submi@al Table 6.9 (Appendix B) , with an updated end of calendar year 2023 amount of supply from the Beaumont Basin Storage Account.

Table 4: Projected Water Supply Availability (AF)
Year 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Beaumont Basin
Likely Used1 1,491 1,267 1,077 916 778
Total Available (Capacity) (6,700) (6,700) (6,700) (6,700) (6,700) West Banning Basin
Likely Used 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430
Total Available (Capacity)1 (1,430) (1,430) (1,430) (1,430) (1,430) Cabazon Basin
Likely Used 853 960 1,054 1,136 1,208
Total Available (Capacity)1 (1,208) (1,208) (1,208) (1,208) (1,208) Banning Bench
Likely Used 1,055 1,187 1,304 1,330 1,330
Total Available (Capacity)1 (1,330) (1,330) (1,330) (1,330) (1,330) Banning Water Canyon
Likely Used 3,679 3,730 3,730 3,730 3,730
Total Available (Capacity)1 (3,730) (3,730) (3,730) (3,730) (3,730) Recharge/Storage
Imported Recharge2 1,000 1,250 1,500 2,000 2,500
WWTP Recharge (Recycled Water)1 0 929 1,245 2,144 2,307 Additional Supply from Storage3 999 2,126 3,156 4,128 4,991 Supply from Storage* 47,652 47,656 43,274 34,993 24,355 Total Available Supply 56,841 57,550 53,294 45,751 35,138 (1) Rows used to calculate the Total Available Supply.
(2) Imported Recharge water was added to Supply from Storage for each preceding year, and therefore not double counted in Total Available Supply
(3) Addi(onal water Supply from Storage was subtracted from Supply from Storage for each preceding year, and therefore not double counted in Total Available Supply (4) See notes under UWMP Table 7.1 and notes under DWR Submi@al Table 6.9 in UWMP Appendix E for a detailed explana(on of the volumes above.
440
18 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION

3.5 GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT
The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, passed by the California Legislature in 2014, is an effort to regulate the use of groundwater in the state so that it is sustainable into the distant future. The Act requires all medium and high priority basins (the San Gorgonio Pass Subbasin is a medium priority basin) to develop a Groundwater Sustainability Plan by January 2022. The contents of this plan are prescrip$ve and well defined by Act. Major components of each plan are a water budget for the subbasin, a hydrogeological conceptual model of the subbasin, and a stakeholder outreach plan.

Specifically, if a proposed development/project and/or subdivision will obtain water from a basin that is designated as medium- or high-priority under Act, the following must be included in the Water Supply Assessment/Verifica$on:
• Informa$on as to whether the Department of Water Resources has iden$fied the basin as being subject to cri$cal condi$ons of overdraB; and
• A copy of the Groundwater Sustainability Plan or alterna$ve plan if a Groundwater Sustainability Agency has adopted such a plan.

According to the Department of Water Resources, the San Gorgonio Pass Subbasin is not iden$fied as being subject to condi$ons of cri$cal overdraB. The San Gorgonio Pass Subbasin has three (3) Groundwater Sustainability Agencies and all three are working together to produce a Groundwater Sustainability Plan. The various water agencies that overlie the subbasin include the Desert Water Agency, Mission Springs Water District, Cabazon Water District, the City of Banning, the Banning Heights Mutual Water Company, and the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency. As of the date of this Water Supply Verifica$on, a Groundwater Sustainability Plan has not been adopted.

441

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
19 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024

3.6 IMPORTED WATER
The City purchases State Water Project (SWP) water from the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency (SGPWA), one of 29 state water agencies with a SWP Water Supply Contract with the State Department of Water Resources (DWR). Quan$$es of SWP water purchased are recharged to the Beaumont Basin on SGPWA property. Recharge points were previously located at Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District (BCVMD). Quan$$es of water obtained from San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency for 2015-2022 are set forth in Table 5 below. Quan$$es that will be recharged in the future are dependent upon State Water Project water availability and storage capacity available to the City.

Table 5: Historic SGPWA Water Purchases (AF)
Year Purchases (AF)
2015 6861
2016 1,4771
2017 1,3501
2018 5001
2019 2501
2020 2501
2021 0
2 2022 352
2023 1,0003
Average: 616
2010 – 2015 Avg:
(2015 UWMP) 847
(1) Source: 2020 UWMP Table 3.2 Imported Water Supply 2015 to 2020 (2) Source: Beaumont Basin Watermaster Consolidated Annual Reports for 2021-2023. (3) Source: City’s Internal Repor(ng
In December 2020, the SGPWA announced that the SWP expected to deliver 10 percent of “Table A” contracted amounts in 2021. This alloca$on was decreased to 5 percent in March 2021. Due to con$nuing drought condi$ons throughout the State, in 2022 SWP alloca$ons to contrac$ng 442
20 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
agencies fluctuated from 0 to 15 percent of “Table A” amounts. The wet winter of 2023 and resultant near-record snowpack in the Sierra Nevada has allowed the DWR to announce increases in “Table A” deliveries in January (30 percent), February (35 percent), and March (75 percent) 2023. In April 2023, the DWR updated its expected deliveries from 75 to 100 percent of maximum annual “Table A” amounts.

Although the City may expect variable reliability in availability of SWP water, such water is not its primary source of water, as it is relied on exclusively for recharge, and previous short-term declines in SWP water availability have been and will con$nue to be offset by the City's substan$al reserves of stored groundwater and would not affect the City’s water supply. Due to the easing of drought condi$ons, the City received delivery of 100% of the 2023 order, and an$cipates even more in 2024. Table 6 shows the years in which the City’s amount of Purchases Water will increase. Beginning in 2024 this value will increase to 1,250 AF and remain so un$l 2035 when it will further increase to 1,500 AF. This value will remain the same un$l 2040 when it will further increase to 2,000 AF and then again in 2045 to 2,500 AF.

Table 6: Projected SGPWA Water Purchases (AF)
Year Purchases (AF)
2024 1,250
2035 1,500
2040 2,000
2045 2,500
Source: City’s Internal Projec(ons, increase based off past SGPWA contract with Ventura that will bring in addi(onal water supply for Banning and Yucaipa.

3.7 BANNING WATER CANYON
In average years the Whitewater Flume provides direct water use to the Banning Heights Mutual Water Company, and the rest goes to recharging the Banning Water Canyon, which the City can then pump from as groundwater. A lot of recharged water is received during the Spring. 443

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
21 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
The Apple Fire of 2020 encompassed the en$re Whitewater Flume structure that diverted water to be recharged into the Banning Water Canyon. In December of 2022 water diversion was restored to the Banning Water Canyon, but the system remains damaged and unable to deliver surface water to BHMWC; therefore, BHMWC's water demands are met by water deliveries from the City of Banning. SCE, BHMWC, and the City are working together to get the system back in opera$on as quickly as possible. Southern California Edison currently owns the Whitewater Flume system.

The City of Banning preserved water stored in the Banning Water Canyon by instead pumping more from the Beaumont Basin Storage Account. This is apparent in the amount in storage for years 2021 and 2022 in Table 3. Since then, enough water has naturally replenished the Banning Water Canyon that the City began pumping water again in 2023 and relied less on the Beaumont Basin Storage Account. The City is not sure when the rest of the system will be restored for direct water replenishment.

3.8 RECYCLED/NON-POTABLE WATER
At this $me there is no recycled water available in the City of Banning. According to the City’s 2018 IMP, the 2006 Recycled Water Master Plan, and the 2020 UWMP, the City an$cipated implemen$ng upgrades by 2025 at the City’s wastewater treatment plant that will meet ter$ary treatment standards to supply recycled water. The City now an$cipates that the wastewater treatment plant improvements will be completed by late 2026 to early 2027. Upon comple$on of the upgrades, approximately 2,700 AFY of recycled water would be available to recycled water customers.

This document is not iden$fying recycled water for use on the Development site, or as a poten$al supply source during the life of the Development. Recycled water use for the Development was also not iden$fied in the 2020 UWMP. However, if the Development were to u$lize recycled water, then the City’s increased use of recycled water would decrease the demand for potable water used in some irriga$on and increase the capability to increase recharging in the West Banning Basin.
444
22 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
Any proposed recycled water system is subject to the design requirements for the City of Banning Public Works Department and the demand criteria guidelines outlined in the 2018 IMP.

Poten
al Recycled Water Users
Upon comple$on of the recycled water upgrades, approximately 2,700 AFY of recycled water will be available to recycled water customers, based on the 2018 IMP. The City’s previous 2006 Recycled Water Master Plan iden$fied poten$al customers across the Interstate 10 Freeway.

However, the 2018 IMP indicated that these poten$al customers were not feasible, due to the difficulty with crossing the 10 Freeway and the railroad tracks, and since there are other poten$al customers south of the 10 Freeway. The poten$al recycled water customers are listed in Table 7 below. As shown in Table 7, the projected total demand for the Atwell Project is 864 AFY.

Ignor e
Table 7: Potential Recycled Water Users
Customer Recycled Water
Demand (AF)
Conversion Year
(Begin Usage of Recycled
Water)
Exisng Developments
Sun Lakes Golf Course 850 2030
Banning High School 175 2035
Dysart Park 87 2035
Lions Park 79 2030
Total 1,191 2035
Projected Developments
Atwell Project 864 20401
Rancho San Gorgonio
Development 217 20452
Neighborhood Park 35 2040
Total 1,116 2045
(1) City does not currently have a connec(on planned from the Recycled Water Main to the Atwell project at this (me. They are plumbing for recycled water, but is not planned for construc(on yet.
(2) By 2035 25% of the Rancho San Gorgonio Development will have converted the desired potable water piping to recycled water.
445

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
23 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Secon 4: Water Demand
As men$oned in Secon 2.3, only two (2) proposed developments, the Atwell Project (formerly “Bu>erfield Specific Plan”) and Rancho San Gorgonio Specific Plan, were accounted for in the 2020 UWMP and 2018 IMP Popula$on Projec$ons. The 2020 UWMP developed Popula$on Projec$ons by linear growth using SCAG es$mates for 2045, plus the two (2) proposed developments, that will bring the popula$on growth to an average of 1,411 persons per year for the next 25 years (to 2045). By 2045, the City will be approaching ul$mate "built-out" condi$ons with remaining expected future water demands primarily a>ributable to possible land use changes in residen$al densi$es and in-fill land development projects. As a result of the City’s local groundwater sources and imported recharge capacity from SGPWA, the City is in a posi$on of providing a reliable source of quality water for the built-out condi$ons.

446
24 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION

4.1 RECENT WATER USE
Annual water consump$on from 2016 to 2022 is listed in Table 8 below. Water consump$on since 2016 has been consistent, with a moderate spike in 2020.

Table 8
City’s Recent Water Use
Year
Total
Consumpon
(AF)
Populaon Per Capita
(GPCD)
2016 7,035 30,769 204
2017 7,576 30,981 218
2018 7,924 31,091 228
2019 7,226 31,142 207
2020 8,596 31,125 247
2021 8,096 31,189 232
2022 7,843 31,253 224
Average (last 7 years): 224
2010-2020 Avg. (2020 UWMP) 234
As indicated by Table 8, the City’s per capita water use has decreased since the 2020 UWMP due to water conserva$on.

4.2 RECENT WATER USE BY SECTOR
The City records water use per service connec$on only and bills customers based on a single water rate structure. Water sales data is compiled by City water staff and recorded on the DWR Form No. 38 (Public Water System Sta$s$cs) and submi>ed to DWR annually. The total water consump$on by customer type since 2015 is shown on Table 9 on the following page.

As noted by Table 9, Single-Family Residen$al accounts are the highest consuming sector in the City since most of the City is zoned for single-family accounts (with higher densi$es for mul$- 447

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
25 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
family accounts). Figure 7 also shows the Current Water Demand by Sector (2022). The City's unaccounted for water ranged from 497 to 1,275 AF, which on average is about 11 percent of the total water supply into the City's distribu$on system. Unaccounted for water consists of rou$ne flushing, unmetered use, and water losses. Although water losses have cost impacts on water agencies, they cannot be prevented en$rely. Instead, effort is given to controlling the quan$ty of water losses (to a cost-effec$ve extent) in order to reduce the cost impact of water losses on water opera$ons. For this reason, the City has prepared water loss audits using AWWA soBware.

The water audits for 2016 to 2019 are provided in the Appendix of the 2020 UWMP. The 2019 Audit shows that the City’s Leakage Index (the ra$o of real loss to unavoidable loss) was 1.16, which is an excellent score for water agencies.

Table 9: Recent Water Use by Sector (AF)
Sector 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Single Family Residen$al 3,370 3,728 3,775 3,438 3,966 4,030 3,955 Mul$-Family Residen$al 69 76 77 70 81 82 78
Commercial 1,686 1,792 1,944 2,021 1,992 2,118 1,546
Industrial 94 102 101 95 172 259 210
Ins$tu$onal/Governmental 58 64 58 28 23 39 410
Landscape Irriga$on
(Potable) 539 579 562 505 559 834 1,004
Landscape Irriga$on
(Non-Potable) 285 306 297 267 301 119 143
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Water Sales: 6,101 6,647 6,814 6,424 7,094 7,481 7,346 Unaccounted for Water* 934 929 1,110 802 1,502 615 497
Total Water Consumpon
(Total Supply into System): 7,035 7,576 7,924 7,226 8,596 8,096 7,843 *Difference between total supply into system and metered/measured volumes. May not match official AWWA Water Audit Reports. 448
26 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
Figure 7: Current Water Demand by Sector (2022)

4.3 WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS
According to the 2020 UWMP, although a constant consump$on rate provides a more conserva$ve approach, the decreasing consump$on rate scenario provides a more realis$c picture for planning purposes as it considers gradual improvements in water-use efficiency and in the case of a mul$ple year event includes mandatory conserva$on measures that would not be in effect in a single year event. For planning purposes, the City's projected water use for 2025- 2045 shown in the 2020 UWMP, which accounted for the Development, is broken down by sector in Table 10. Figure 8 shows the Projected Water Demand by Sector (in 2045) with the Development.

Single Family

50.4%
Multi-Family

1.0%
Commercial

19.7%
Industrial

2.7%
Institutional/
Governmental

5.2%
Landscape
(Potable)

12.8%
Landscape
(Non-Potable)

1.8% Loss

6.3%
449

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
27 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Table 10
Projected Water Use by Sector – With Development
Sector 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Water Service Area Popula$on 35,486 42,541 49,596 56,651 63,706 Consump$on Rate (GPCD)
Including 1.0% Annual Passive Savings 217 207 197 187 178 Demands
Single Family Residen$al 4,357 4,967 5,507 5,982 6,397
Mul$-Family Residen$al 86 98 109 119 127
Commercial 1,703 1,941 2,152 2,338 2,500
Industrial 232 264 293 318 340
Ins$tu$onal/Governmental 451 514 570 619 662
Landscape Irriga$on (Potable) 1,106 1,261 1,398 1,519 1,624 Landscape Irriga$on ((Non-Potable) 158 180 199 216 231
Total Water Sales: 8,093 9,226 10,229 11,112 11,883
Unaccounted for Water 548 625 693 752 805
Total Water Consumpon
(Total Supply into System): 8,641 9,851 10,922 11,864 12,688 Notes:

1. Overall projec(ons shown above are lower than the projec(ons shown in Table 6.6 of the 2020 UWMP due to recent lower water consump(on rates.

2. Some projected potable landscape irriga(on demands may be switched to the “non-potable” category when recycled water is available.

Figure 8: Projected Water Demand by Sector – With Development (in 2045) Single Family
6,397 AF
Multi-Family
127 AF
Commercial
2,500 AF
Industrial
340 AF
Institutional/
Governmental
662 AF
Landscape
(Potable)
1,624 AF
Landscape
(Non-Potable)
231 AF
Loss
805 AF
1 2
450
28 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
451

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
29 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Secon 5: Water Supply vs. Demand Analysis

5.1 CITY SUPPLY RELIABILITY
The City's groundwater is not subject to short-term water shortages resul$ng from temporary dry weather condi$ons. Further, as part of the Beaumont Basin adjudica$on, the City has the op$on of storing up to 80,000 acre-feet (AF) of water in the Beaumont Basin. At the end of calendar year 2023, the City of Banning had approximately 47,650 AF of groundwater available in the Beaumont Basin Storage Account (Table 3), which is u$lized as a buffer to make up for dry weather condi$ons and will be used in future years to meet demands that exceed local safe yields.

452
30 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION

5.2 DROUGHT RISK ASSESSMENT
The drought risk assessment is an assessment of the reliability of the City’s water supplies by comparing projected future water demands with expected available water supplies under three (3) different hydrologic condi$ons: normal year; a single dry year; and mul$ple dry years. Future supply and demand condi$ons can be determined from popula$on forecasts, capacity of water supply facili$es (wells), and recent water use trends.

Basis for Projected Demands
To project future demands, it will be assumed that total demand will change annually based on changes in popula$on mul$plied by the individual demand per-person (also known as the “percapita” consump$on rate, see Secon 4.1). The per-capita rates used in the future projec$ons will be based on actual water use data from the recent past. In par$cular, the City’s averages for the last seven (7) years will be used as the basis to project demands through the year 2045. To project demands and supplies, the following is assumed:
• Starting consumption rate of 224 gallons per capita per day (GPCD). This is based on the average consump$on of the City in the last 7 years.
• Decreasing consumption rate from 2023 onward with a passive savings of 1.0% annually (i.e. 222 GPCD in 2023).

Although a constant consump$on rate provides a more conserva$ve approach, the decreasing consump$on rate scenario provides a more realis$c picture for planning purposes since it considers gradual improvements in water-use efficiency. In the past 20 years for instance, the City has seen a 6% annual decrease in water use. For drought-$me demands, it is expected that there will be a small degree of increase due to the lack of rainfall on landscapes. To project demands during single and multiple (5) year drought periods, the following increase factors were assumed:
• Dry Year: 5%
• Mul$ple Dry Years: 5%, 8%, and 2%
453

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
31 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Although the UWMP did not assume increases in demand during dry years, the increase factors listed above are reasonable for the purposes of demand and supply projec$ons since the City has seen increases in demands prior to the 2014 Emergency Declara$on and 2015 Execu$ve Order.

Basis for Projected Supplies
To project future supplies, the City can expect groundwater supplies to be based on the combined capacity of its groundwater wells, with a maximum safe yield for each subbasin. The City’s groundwater basins have a combined safe yield capacity of roughly 9,200 AFY. Further, as part of the Beaumont Basin adjudica$on, the City has the op$on of storing up to 80,000 AF of water in the Beaumont Basin.

5.3 ENSURING ADEQUATE SUPPLY
The City has available groundwater supplies based on the safe yield of the subbasins and the City’s storage account. The City’s subbasin safe yield and storage account volumes are not expected to be affected during droughts las$ng up to five (5) years. Droughts will be addressed by following the criteria of the City's Water Shortage Con$ngency Plan (WSCP) along with implementa$on of the regional con$ngency plans. These programs are discussed in the UWMP.

As indicated by the tables on the following pages, with the Development’s projected water demand the City does not expect to have a water supply shortage during Normal Water Years, Single Dry Year, or Mul$ple Dry Years over the next 20 years.

The following tables were originally based off the 2020 UWMP, which at the $me u$lized data up to 2020. Since then, three (3) years of data has been produced and in order to be>er determine any possible supply shorZalls the most up to date data was used and the most conserva$ve approach was taken. Some key updates include:
• Popula$on Projec$ons updated based off 2022 value of 31,253 from the City’s 2022 Validated Water Audit.
• Imported Water purchased in 2023 was 1,000 AF, and is projected to increase to 1,250 AF in 2024, 1,500 AF in 2030, 2,000 AF in 2035, and 2,500 AF in 2045 (Table 6). 454
32 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
• It is an$cipated that Recycled Water will begin entering the City’s distribu$on system beginning in 2035, as shown in Table 7. This addi$onal supply will most likely supplement the Landscape Irriga$on (Potable and Non-Potable) sector with 1,245 AF in 2035 and will increase to 2,307 AF by 2040, where it will remain un$l further developments are made. i. Based off the Bu>erfield Specific Plan (“Atwell” Project), Recycled Water may be used at the Development. However, a quan$fied value was not given and not enough informa$on is available at this $me to determine an amount. Therefore, this WSV will conserva$vely exclude Recycled Water use that will specifically supplement the Development’s Projected Water Demand.
ii. The 2018 IMP projected that the Atwell Project would use approximately 864 AF of Recycled Water.
455

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
33 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Table 11
City of Banning Water Supply Availability & Demand Projecons - Including Atwell Project Normal Water Year (AF)
Water Sources 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Population
Water Service Area Population 35,486 42,541 49,596 56,651 63,706 Consumption Rate (GPCD)
Including 1% Annual Passive Savings 217 207 197 187 178 Supply
Groundwater Pumped (Total) 7,641 7,725 7,766 7,736 7,697 Pumped from Beaumont Basin Storage
Account2 999 2126 3156 4128 4991
Total Anticipated Use of Supplies
(Estimated Production) 8,641 9,851 10,922 11,864 12,688 Total Available Supply3 56,840 57,549 55,047 49,063 39,394 Demand
Total Estimated Demand1 8,641 9,851 10,922 11,864 12,688 Compare to Avg. Demand for
Previous 7 Yrs. (7,757 AF) 111% 127% 141% 153% 164%
Supply/Demand Comparison
Supply-Demand (Difference) 0 0 0 0 0
Supply/Demand (%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Available Leftover Supply Capacity 48,199 47,698 44,125 37,199 26,706 General Note: Projec(ons shown above, including per capita consump(on rates (GPCD), are lower than the projec(ons shown in Tables 7.1 to 7.7 of the 2020 UWMP due to recent lower water consump(on rates (since the 2020 UWMP).

Footnotes (see number references in table above):

1. Total Demand = Consump$on Rate x Popula$on
a. Average consump$on rate of last 7 years = 224 gallons per capita per day. b. Consump$on rate in 2016: 204 gpcd.
c. Consump$on rate in 2022: 224 gpcd.
d. Approximate “passive” savings over past 20 years: 6 gpcd per year. e. Projected “passive” savings: 1 gpcd per year = 178 gpcd by 2045.

2. The Beaumont Basin Storage Account at end of 2023 contained approximately 47,650 AF of groundwater.

3. Total Available Supply = [Safe Yield for each Basin (Beaumont Basin’s reasonably available volume for that year; Cabazon Basin’s maximum reasonably available volume, which takes place in 2045) + Beaumont Basin Storage Account]. a. Imported water purchased from SGPWA is recharged into the Beaumont Basin, and will be credited to the City in their storage account, allowing for the Reasonably Available Volume to increase. The projec$ons for Imported water purchased is based on the City’s recent purchases from SGPWA:
i. Low of 1,000 AF in 2025
ii. High of 2,500 AF in 2045
456
34 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
Table 12
City of Banning Water Supply Availability & Demand Projecons - Including Atwell Project Single Dry Year (AF)
Water Sources 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Population
Water Service Area Population 35,486 42,541 49,596 56,651 63,706 Consumption Rate (GPCD)
Including 1% Annual Passive Savings 217 207 197 187 178 Supply
Groundwater Pumped (Total) 7,641 7,725 7,766 7,736 7,697 Pumped from Beaumont Basin Storage
Account3 1,431 2,619 3,702 4,721 5,625
Total Anticipated Use of Supplies
(Estimated Production) 9,073 10,344 11,468 12,457 13,322 Total Available Supply4 56,077 56,022 50,752 41,945 29,568 Normal Year Supply 8,641 9,851 10,922 11,864 12,688
% of Normal Year 105% 105% 105% 105% 105%
Demand
Total Dry Demand1 9,073 10,344 11,468 12,457 13,322
Normal Year Demand 8,641 9,851 10,922 11,864 12,688
% of Normal Year 105% 105% 105% 105% 105%
Supply/Demand Comparison
Supply-Demand (Difference)5 0 0 0 0 0
Supply/Demand (%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Available Leftover Supply Capacity 47,004 45,678 39,284 29,488 16,246 General Note: Projec(ons shown above, including per capita consump(on rates (GPCD), are lower than the projec(ons shown in Tables 7.1 to 7.7 of the 2020 UWMP due to recent lower water consump(on rates (since the 2020 UWMP).

Footnotes (see number references in table above):

1. Total Demand = [Consump$on Rate x Popula$on] x Single Dry Year Increase of 105%.

2. Imported water purchased from SGPWA and recharged into the Beaumont Basin during a Single Dry Year will be 236 AF.

3. A net-zero Supply-Demand (Difference) reveals that an addi$onal amount of groundwater will be taken out of the Beaumont Basin Storage Account to meet the Total Dry Demand, on top of the Normal Water Year amount. A posi$ve difference will be added to the Available LeBover Supply Capacity (Total Available Supply - Total Dry Demand + Difference) of subsequent years, as a surplus of water that was not pumped due to a low Total Dry Demand. For all cases there is more than enough in storage, as shown by the Available LeBover Supply Capacity.

4. All other items derived in similitude to Table 11.
457

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
35 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Table 13
City of Banning Water Supply Availability & Demand Projecons - Including Atwell Project Mulple Dry Years (2023-2027) (AF)
Water Sources 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Population
Water Service Area Population 32,664 34,075 35,486 36,897 38,308 Consumption Rate (GPCD)
Including 1% Annual Passive Savings
222 220 217 215 213
Supply
Groundwater Pumped (Total) 7,641 7,641 7,641 7,641 7,641 Pumped from Beaumont Basin Storage
Account3 999 1,410 1,172 1,431 1,684
Total Anticipated Use of Supplies
(Estimated Production) 8,641 9,052 8,814 9,072 9,325
Total Available Supply4 56,840 57,494 56,320 55,383 54,897 Normal Year Supply 8,641 8,641 8,641 9,851 9,851
% of Normal Year 100% 105% 102% 92% 95%
Demand
Total Dry Demand1 8,521 9,052 8,814 9,072 9,325
Normal Year Demand 8,115 8,381 8,641 8,895 9,142
% of Normal Year 105% 108% 102% 102% 102%
Supply/Demand Comparison
Supply-Demand (Difference)5 120 0 0 0 0
Supply/Demand (%) 101% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Available Leftover Supply Capacity 48,319 48,562 47,506 46,311 45,572 General Note: Projec(ons shown above, including per capita consump(on rates (GPCD), are lower than the projec(ons shown in Tables 7.1 to 7.7 of the 2020 UWMP due to recent lower water consump(on rates (since the 2020 UWMP).

Footnotes (see number references in table above):

1. Total Demand = [Consump$on Rate x Popula$on] x Mul$ple Dry Year Increases of 105%, 108%, and 102%.

2. Imported water purchased from SGPWA and recharged into the Beaumont Basin during Mul$ple Dry Years will be as follows:
a. Dry Year 1: 1,653 AF
b. Dry Year 2: 236 AF
c. Dry Year 3: 236 AF
d. Dry Year 4: 945 AF
e. Dry Year 5: 1,653 AF

4. All other items derived in similitude to Table 11.
458
36 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
Table 14
City of Banning Water Supply Availability & Demand Projecons - Including Atwell Project Mulple Dry Years (2028-2032) (AF)
Water Sources 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Population
Water Service Area Population 39,719 41,130 42,541 43,952 45,363 Consumption Rate (GPCD)
Including 1% Annual Passive Savings
211 209 207 205 203
Supply
Groundwater Pumped (Total) 7,641 7,641 7,725 7,725 7,725 Pumped from Beaumont Basin Storage
Account3 2,212 2,749 2,323 2,553 2,777
Total Anticipated Use of Supplies
(Estimated Production) 9,854 10,390 10,048 10,277 10,501 Total Available Supply4 57,549 56,990 54,477 52,390 50,782 Normal Year Supply 9,851 9,851 10,922 10,922 10,922
% of Normal Year 100% 105% 92% 94% 96%
Demand
Total Dry Demand1 9,854 10,390 10,048 10,277 10,501
Normal Year Demand 9,384 9,620 9,851 10,076 10,295
% of Normal Year 105% 108% 102% 102% 102%
Supply/Demand Comparison
Supply-Demand (Difference)5 0 0 0 0 0
Supply/Demand (%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Available Leftover Supply Capacity 47,695 46,599 44,429 42,112 40,280 General Note: Projec(ons shown above, including per capita consump(on rates (GPCD), are lower than the projec(ons shown in Tables 7.1 to 7.7 of the 2020 UWMP due to recent lower water consump(on rates (since the 2020 UWMP).

Footnotes (see number references in table above):

1. Total Demand = [Consump$on Rate x Popula$on] x Mul$ple Dry Year Increases of 105%, 108%, and 102%.

4. All other items derived in similitude to Table 11.
459

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
37 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Table 15
City of Banning Water Supply Availability & Demand Projecons - Including Atwell Project Mulple Dry Years (2033-2037) (AF)
Water Sources 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037
Population
Water Service Area Population 46,774 48,185 49,596 51,007 52,418 Consumption Rate (GPCD)
Including 1% Annual Passive Savings 201 199 197 195 193 Supply
Groundwater Pumped (Total) 7,725 7,725 7,766 7,766 7,766 Pumped from Beaumont Basin Storage
Account3 3,310 3,851 3,375 3,577 3,774
Total Anticipated Use of Supplies
(Estimated Production) 11,035 11,576 11,140 11,343 11,540 Total Available Supply4 55,047 53,390 49,775 46,636 44,004 Normal Year Supply 10,922 10,922 11,864 11,864 11,864
% of Normal Year 101% 106% 94% 96% 97%
Demand
Total Dry Demand1 11,035 11,576 11,140 11,343 11,540
Normal Year Demand 10,510 10,718 10,922 11,120 11,314
% of Normal Year 105% 108% 102% 102% 102%
Supply/Demand Comparison
Supply-Demand (Difference)5 0 0 0 0 0
Supply/Demand (%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Available Leftover Supply Capacity 44,012 41,814 38,634 35,293 32,464 General Note: Projec(ons shown above, including per capita consump(on rates (GPCD), are lower than the projec(ons shown in Tables 7.1 to 7.7 of the 2020 UWMP due to recent lower water consump(on rates (since the 2020 UWMP).

Footnotes (see number references in table above):

1. Total Demand = [Consump$on Rate x Popula$on] x Mul$ple Dry Year Increases of 105%, 108%, and 102%.

4. All other items derived in similitude to Table 11.
460
38 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
Table 16
City of Banning Water Supply Availability & Demand Projecons - Including Atwell Project Mulple Dry Years (2038-2042) (AF)
Water Sources 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042
Population
Water Service Area Population 53,829 55,240 56,651 58,062 59,473 Consumption Rate (GPCD)
Including 1% Annual Passive Savings 191 189 187 185 183 Supply
Groundwater Pumped (Total) 7,766 7,766 7,736 7,736 7,736 Pumped from Beaumont Basin Storage
Account3 4,311 4,855 4,365 4,542 4,715
Total Anticipated Use of Supplies
(Estimated Production) 12,077 12,620 12,101 12,279 12,451 Total Available Supply4 49,063 46,405 41,787 37,658 34,060 Normal Year Supply 11,864 11,864 12,688 12,688 12,688
% of Normal Year 102% 106% 95% 97% 98%
Demand
Total Dry Demand1 12,077 12,620 12,101 12,279 12,451
Normal Year Demand 11,502 11,685 11,864 12,038 12,207
% of Normal Year 105% 108% 102% 102% 102%
Supply/Demand Comparison
Supply-Demand (Difference)5 0 0 0 0 0
Supply/Demand (%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Available Leftover Supply Capacity 36,986 33,785 29,685 25,379 21,609 General Note: Projec(ons shown above, including per capita consump(on rates (GPCD), are lower than the projec(ons shown in Tables 7.1 to 7.7 of the 2020 UWMP due to recent lower water consump(on rates (since the 2020 UWMP).

Footnotes (see number references in table above):

1. Total Demand = [Consump$on Rate x Popula$on] x Mul$ple Dry Year Increases of 105%, 108%, and 102%.

4. All other items derived in similitude to Table 11.
461

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
39 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Table 17
City of Banning Water Supply Availability & Demand Projecons - Including Atwell Project Mulple Dry Years (2043-2047) (AF)
Water Sources 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047
Population
Water Service Area Population 60,884 62,295 63,706 65,117 66,528 Consumption Rate (GPCD)
Including 1% Annual Passive Savings 181 180 178 176 174 Supply
Groundwater Pumped (Total) 7,736 7,736 7,697 7,697 7,697 Pumped from Beaumont Basin Storage
Account3 5,254 5,798 5,245 5,399 5,549
Total Anticipated Use of Supplies
(Estimated Production) 12,990 13,535 12,941 13,096 13,246 Total Available Supply4 39,394 35,793 30,231 25,222 20,768 Normal Year Supply 12,688 12,688 12,688 12,688 12,688
% of Normal Year 102% 107% 102% 103% 104%
Demand
Total Dry Demand1 12,990 13,535 12,941 13,096 13,246
Normal Year Demand 12,372 12,532 12,688 12,839 12,986
% of Normal Year 105% 108% 102% 102% 102%
Supply/Demand Comparison
Supply-Demand (Difference)5 0 0 0 0 0
Supply/Demand (%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Available Leftover Supply Capacity 26,403 22,258 17,289 12,126 7,522 General Note: Projec(ons shown above, including per capita consump(on rates (GPCD), are lower than the projec(ons shown in Tables 7.1 to 7.7 of the 2020 UWMP due to recent lower water consump(on rates (since the 2020 UWMP).

Footnotes (see number references in table above):

1. Total Demand = [Consump$on Rate x Popula$on] x Mul$ple Dry Year Increases of 105%, 108%, and 102%.

4. All other items derived in similitude to Table 11.
462
40 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
463

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
41 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Secon 6: Water-Use Efficiency Strategies
The City of Banning is commi>ed to implemen$ng water conserva$on programs and encourages its customers to conserve water whenever possible. This year (2024) the City became a member of the California Water Efficiency Partnership (CalWEP). The City con$nues to implement the seven (7) categories of conserva$on measures as described in the CalWEP Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The City of Banning is commi>ed to implemen$ng water conserva$on programs and encourages its customers to conserve water whenever possible.

6.1 DEVELOPMENT CONSERVATION MEASURES
As outlined in UWMP Chapter 9 - Conserva$on Measures, the following demand measures are applicable to the Development:
464
42 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
• City Ordinance No. 1039 was adopted by the City Council in 1991, prohibi$ng the waste of water. Ordinance No. 1039 describes ac$ons that are considered a waste of water and the subsequent penal$es if a viola$on were to occur.
• In 1998, this Ordinance was incorporated into City Ordinance No. 1231. In 2006, Assembly Bill No. 1881 was passed, requiring local agencies, beginning January 1, 2010, to adopt a model water efficiency landscape ordinance that is at least as effec$ve as the State's model water efficiency landscape ordinance. The City Council adopted Resolu$on No. 2010-06 on January 26, 2010 to meet this requirement.
• The City adopted Ordinance No. 1489 pertaining to drought water conserva$on. This ordinance sets forth mandatory prohibi$ons and addi$onal restric$ons on water use during drought condi$ons to comply with the execu$ve orders issued by Governor Brown pertaining to the declared drought emergency and with the emergency water conserva$on regula$ons promulgated by the State Water Resources Control Board. • All of the City's water service connec$ons, for all customer sectors, are metered.

Addi$onally, the City has installed dedicated landscape irriga$on meters for Sun Lakes Country Club, Caltrans, the City park system, and City school district facili$es. The City will con$nue to meter all new water service connec$ons.
• The City has a three (3)-$ered increasing rate structure that applies to all customers. The City is currently inves$ga$ng the poten$al of a fixed or drive-by Automa$c Meter Read (AMR) system that allows the City to monitor each individual customer account for water conserva$on.
• The City has ini$ated several water conserva$on programs to educate its water service customers in regard to various approaches to conserve water. At City Hall, water conserva$on pamphlets are displayed year-round as well as at public citywide events. 465

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
43 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
• As part of the City's normal opera$ons, the City repairs major leaks to the distribu$on system as soon as possible aBer they are discovered. Further, under the City's capital improvement plan, old leaking pipes are con$nually being replaced.

The City's average consump$on rate for the past 7 years is calculated to be 224 gallons per capita per day (GPCD), which demonstrates that the City has met its interim urban water use target of 284 GPCD as well as the 2020 target of 252 GPCD. The City can maintain its consump$on rates and future targets by con$nuing to focus on water conserva$on.

466
44 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

467

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
45 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION 2024
Secon 7: Water Supply Verificaon
The Atwell Specific Plan Phase 2B Development has a total project area of 119.9 acres and will consist of 530 single-family residen$al lots, six (6) parking lots, 26 open space and le>ered (unassigned) lots, private common driveways, and public streets, all within the Atwell Project (formerly “Bu>erfield Specific Plan”). The Development is located in the westerly por$on of the City, as shown in Figure 1. According to Secon 2, the projected water demand coming from the proposed Phase 2B Development is approximately 298 AFY. This demand was accounted for in the 2020 UWMP and 2018 IMP Popula$on Projec$ons.

This WSV reviewed and analyzed supply and demand data for the years subsequent to the 2020 UWMP and prior to this WSV (2021 through 2023). Based on the supply vs demand Tables 11 through 17 in Secon 5, the City can expect to meet future demands for all climate condi$ons through 2045, including the proposed Development.
468
46 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
ATWELL SPECIFIC PLAN PHASE 2B
2024 WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION

7.1 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The overall Atwell Project remaining phasing plan proposes four (4) future development phases with poten$al sub-phases. It is expected that individual WSV Reports will be provided for each subsequent phase of the project. Build-out condi$ons in the City will likely occur over an es$mated total dura$on of 30-years. Market condi$ons will dictate this pace and it is likely that build-out will occur at a slower pace.

Notwithstanding, the overall Atwell Project’s expected water demand is within the 2020 UWMP’s total projected water supply availability and demand during normal, single dry, and mul$ple dry water years for the next 20-25 years. Therefore, there will be adequate supplies to meet the projected water demand associated with the overall Atwell Project, in addi$on to the other exis$ng and projected water demands in the City.

This Phase 2B WSV shall be adopted by City Council via resolu$on. City staff shall prepare a staff report detailing the efforts made in preparing this WSV. The City will also prepare a “Will Serve Le>er”, which will declare that the City will provide a water service connec$on(s) to the proposed Project. The Will Serve Le>er will be issued upon payment of all fees by the Developer.

Should the construc$on of the proposed Project be delayed, it is recommended that this WSV be reviewed every five (5) years prior to construc$on, to verify that the City will have capacity to serve the Project.
469
Appendix A: Council Resolution Adopting Water Supply Verification Water Supply Verification – Atwell Specific Plan Phase 2B 470
Appendix B: Excerpts from 2020 Urban Water Management Plan Water Supply Verification – Atwell Specific Plan Phase 2B 471
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 2: SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION
2 - 7
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020

2.3.3 Recent Developments
The City has experienced very substantial
developments in recent years. Recent or
planned developments are shown on Figure

2.5. Some of these developments are listed
in Table 2.2:

Table 2.2
Recent Developments in City of Banning
(Since 2015 UWMP)
No. Development
1 Banning Distribution Center*
2 Mountain Ave. Baptist School
(Expansion of existing private school
and installation of five modular
building)
3 Inland Behavioral Health Services
4 ESTES Trucking Terminal*
5 West Coast Electric*
6 Cruz Industrial Truck Inc.
7 O'Reilly's Auto Parts*
8 Taco Bell
Tot. Eight (8) Developments
*Pending or Under Construction

2.3.4 Planned Developments
Currently, there are two (2) significant
developments planned within the City's
water service area, as described below. Final
subdivision maps prepared for the two
projects will comply with the provisions of
CA Government Code Section 66473.7.

Atwell (Formerly “Butterfield”)
The Atwell Specific Plan is a master planned
community project that encompasses 1,543
acres and includes approximately 4,900
residential dwelling units, two elementary
schools, two commercial sites, and
community parks and trails. The project will
be constructed in five phases over an
estimated period of 30 years. Figure 2.1
shows some of the developments currently
being constructed.

Figure 2.1: Atwell Development
A project-specific water supply assessment
(WSA), titled Water Supply Assessment for
Atwell Specific Plan, Issued June 2011 with
the Draft EIR, Modified December 2011 by
Section 4.1 of the Final EIR, was prepared to
determine the adequacy of existing and
future water supplies to serve the project.
472
2 - 8 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 2: SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for
Atwell, which includes an analysis of water
supply supported by the project specific
WSA cited above, has been approved by City
Council.

Tri Pointe Homes (formerly known as Pardee
Homes), the home builder responsible for
the new development, has stated that
escrow was closed on 83 homes in
2020. They are projecting 392 escrow
closings by year end of 2021, bringing the
total number of closed homes to 475. They
are projecting 316 escrow closings in 2022,
bringing the total number of homes
occupied by new buyers to 791.

Rancho San Gorgonio
The Rancho San Gorgonio Specific Plan
(Rancho San Gorgonio) is a master planned
community project that encompasses
approximately 831 acres and includes up to
3,385 residential dwelling units, almost 49
acres of neighborhood and community
parks, over 160 acres of paseos and open
space, and approximately 81 acres of rightof-way and utility easements. The project is anticipated to be constructed in six phases
over a period of 18 years. This period is likely
to be extended due to varying economic
factors.

A project-specific WSA was prepared for
Rancho San Gorgonio, titled Water Supply
Assessment Rancho San Gorgonio Specific
Plan, by Madole & Associates, Inc. and
Encompass Associates, Inc., in 2015.

The Draft EIR for Rancho San Gorgonio
analyzes water supply supported by the
project-specific WSA cited above. Both the
EIR and WSA have been completed and
approved by the City Council.

2.4 CLIMATE
The City is located within the San Gorgonio
Pass, which is a transitional zone where
coastal climates transition to desert,
resulting in significantly differing landscape
and geology. The climate can best be
characterized by hot, dry summers and
short, mild winters. The region receives an
average annual rainfall of approximately

19.7 inches, most of which takes place
between December and March.

Evapotranspiration (ETo) in the area ranges
from 7.88 inches in July to 1.94 inches in
December.

As the State of California and the Riverside
County region has undergone a several-year
drought, rainfall has been much lower in the
City. Southern California is also expected to
be in a moderate La Nina year for 2021.

Recent ETo and rainfall for the City is listed
in Table 2.3:
473
3 - 10 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Table 3.2
Imported Water Supply 2015 to 2020
(Purchases of SWP water from SGPWA)
Year Purchases
(AF)
2015 686
2016 1,477
2017 1,350
2018 500
2019 250
2020 250
Average: 752
2010-2015 Avg.
(2015 UWMP) 847
Although the City purchases imported
water, this water is used solely for recharge
of the Beaumont Basin. None of the water
purchased is supplied directly to the City’s
customers. The amount of imported water
available to the City for groundwater
recharge is dependent on SGPWA’s
available supply from the SWP. According to
the water supply contract between DWR
and the SGPWA, SGPWA’s maximum annual
entitlement from the SWP is 17,300 AFY.

Under shortage conditions, SGPWA could
limit volumes by implementing SGPWA’s
Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP).

The SGPWA also has a financial plan in place
to obtain additional supplies necessary to
meet projected demands within its service
area. Sources include the dry-year water
purchase program, exchanges with the
Crestline-Lake Arrowhead Water Agency
(CLAWA), and other supplemental water as
available. The SGPWA is expected to
purchase additional supplies by 2020 to
meet demands.

3.4 GROUNDWATER SOURCES
The City is within the boundaries of the
Coachella Valley Hydrologic Unit, which
encompasses several groundwater basins,
including the Coachella Valley Groundwater
Basin (Basin), within which the City is
located. The Basin is underlain by several
large subbasins, the boundaries of which
are mostly defined by fault lines that restrict
the lateral flow of water. The Basin extends
from Banning easterly to the Salton Sea.

The City is underlain by the San Gorgonio
Pass Subbasin (SGP Subbasin) portion of the
Basin per Figure 3.7 on the following page.

The SGP Subbasin is divided into water
storage units (also colloquially termed
"basins"), as depicted in Figure 3.8. The City
extracts groundwater from the West
Banning Storage Unit (formerly known as
the Banning Storage Unit), the Banning
Bench Storage Unit, the Cabazon Storage
Unit (formerly known as the East Banning
Storage Unit), the Beaumont Storage Unit,
and the Banning Water Canyon Storage
Unit, as shown in DWR Submittal Table 6-1
in Appendix E. The storage unit boundaries
have been defined in a 2006 USGS report
474
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
3 - 11
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020
Figure 3.7: San Gorgonio Pass Groundwater Basin
City Boundaries
475
3 - 12 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
on Groundwater Hydrology, in the San
Gorgonio Pass Area (Scientific Investigations
Report 2006-5026), prepared by USGS in
cooperation with the SGPWA, dated 2006.

Since this report, DWR, SGPWA, and the
City have refined the details of these
storage units.

Groundwater recharge in the area results
from precipitation infiltrating into the
ground within the surface water
catchments and particularly in the canyons
north of the City. An additional source of
recharge is subsurface inflow (also referred
to as underflow) from storage unit to
storage unit, infiltration of Whitewater
River diversions in the Banning Water
Canyon, and from percolation of treated
wastewater into the Cabazon Storage Unit.

The Banning Water Canyon area receives
water from the percolation of canyon flows
through the gravelly soils of the canyon
bottom. The San Gorgonio River running
southerly through the Banning Water
Canyon provides intake areas for
distributing water to spreading ditches that
interconnect with spreading ponds located
approximately one mile north of the
Banning Bench to enhance percolation.

A hydrogeological study was conducted by
Geoscience to determine the maximum
perennial yield of the groundwater storage
units in the vicinity and to determine the
anticipated future available water supply
from the Beaumont Storage Unit, West
Banning Storage Unit, Banning Bench
Storage Unit, Cabazon Storage Unit, and
Banning Water Canyon Storage Unit. The
findings of the study are set forth in the
report by Geoscience, titled Maximum
Perennial Yield Estimates for the Banning
and Cabazon Storage Units, and Available
Water Supply from the Beaumont Basin,
dated March 29, 2011 (herein referred to as
the Geoscience Report). The individual
basin safe yields and projected groundwater
production (from each basin) are included
in Table 3.4 of this Section and in Appendix
E as DWR Submittal Table 6-9 (Projected
Water Supplies).

3.4.1 Beaumont Basin (Storage Unit)
The Beaumont Storage Unit (also referred
to as the Beaumont Basin) is located
primarily in the City of Beaumont, with
some portions located within Banning,
Calimesa, and Cherry Valley, as depicted in
Figure 3.8. The Beaumont Storage Unit
covers approximately 12,480 acres (19.5
square miles). The City operates four (4)
groundwater production wells, namely
Wells C2, C3, C4, and M3, within the
Beaumont Basin. The City also maintains an
additional, non-operating well in the
Beaumont Basin (Well M9). The 4 active
wells have a combined nominal capacity of
4,650 gallons per minute (gpm). The City
also co-owns with BCVWD three additional
476
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
3 - 13
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020
Figure 3.8: Groundwater Basins in the City (Subbasins of San Gorgonio Pass Basin) City Boundaries
477
3 - 14 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Beaumont
Basin is the only
adjudicated
storage unit within
the San Gorgonio
Pass Basin
groundwater production wells (Wells 24,
25, and 26), with a combined nominal
capacity of 6,800 gpm, of which half is
allotted to the City. Therefore, the City's
total nominal pumping capacity in the
Beaumont Basin is 8,050 gpm. The
forementioned Wells in the Beaumont
Basin are shown in Figure 3.9.

The Beaumont Basin is an adjudicated basin
pursuant to the Stipulation for Entry of
Judgment Adjudicating Groundwater Rights
in the Beaumont Basin (the Judgment), a
copy of which is
included in Appendix L
of this Plan. Pursuant
to the Judgment, the
Court appointed a fivemember Watermaster
Committee, consisting
of members from each
of the five member agencies, which include
the Cities of Banning and Beaumont,
Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District,
South Mesa Water Company, and Yucaipa
Valley Water District.

The safe yield of the Beaumont Basin was
initially established at 8,650 AF/yr, to be
distributed among the appropriators. The
safe yield is to be reevaluated at least once
every ten years. Based on the 2013
Reevaluation of the Beaumont Basin Safe
Yield, dated April 3, 2015, the safe yield was
determined to be 6,700 AF/yr.

Based on a description of the Judgment
included in the Beaumont Basin
Watermaster 2019 Annual Report Draft,
dated December 2020 (referred to herein as
the 2019 Watermaster Report), a controlled
overdraft (also referred to as temporary
surplus) was created to allow the
appropriators to extract from the
Beaumont Basin, during the first ten years
after adoption of the Judgment, a maximum
of 16,000 AF/yr. The temporary surplus
was divided among the appropriators, with
City of Banning receiving 31.43 percent (or
5,029 AF/yr).

After the first 10 years of operation ended
in 2014, appropriators no longer receive the
temporary surplus and are permitted to
extract only the amount each has in storage
or credited to them. At the end of calendar
year 2019, the City had approximately
51,917.9 AF in its storage account, based on
the 2019 Watermaster Report. City of
Banning is permitted to store up to 80,000
AF in the Beaumont Basin.

On an annual basis, the Watermaster
determines the amount of groundwater to
which each producer is entitled from the
Beaumont Basin without incurring a
replenishment obligation. City of Banning is
entitled to 31.43% of the unused production
in the Beaumont Basin. Quantities to which
the City is entitled but does not pump can
be credited to the City's storage account.
478
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
3 - 15
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020
Figure 3.9: Well Locations in the Beaumont Basin
479
3 - 16 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Figure 3.10: Spreading Grounds at WWTP

3.4.2 West Banning Storage
The West Banning Storage Unit lies south of
the Banning Bench Storage Unit and east of
the Beaumont Storage Unit, as depicted on
Figure 3.8. The total surface area of the
West Banning Storage Unit is approximately
2,489 acres (3.9 square miles). The area is
underlain by alluvial sediments, with
bedrock occurring to the north in the San
Bernardino Mountains. The City currently
operates four (4) groundwater production
wells within the West Banning Storage Unit,
namely C5, M7, M10, and M11. The City lost
Well M-12 within the basin, due to a cavein, but is currently looking into redrilling.

3.4.3 Cabazon Storage Unit
The Cabazon Storage Unit is located near
the eastern boundary of the City, southeast
of the West Banning Storage Unit and the
Banning Bench Storage Unit, as depicted on
Figure 3.8. The Cabazon Storage Unit
encompasses a surface area of
approximately 17,215 acres (26.9 square
miles). The City currently operates one (1)
groundwater production well in the
Cabazon Storage Unit, namely Well C6, with
a nominal pumping capacity of 900 gpm.

Additional groundwater can be produced
from the Cabazon Storage Unit. A water
balance prepared for the Cabazon Storage
Unit, as described in the Geoscience Report,
determined that a positive change in
storage has occurred as a result of inflow
and outflow factors, including effluent from
the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP)
percolated from the adjacent spreading
grounds (Figure 3.10 above). Therefore,
future projections of available water from
480
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
3 - 17
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020
the Cabazon Storage Unit assume that all
inflow and outflow values remain the same,
with the exception of treated wastewater
applied to the basin.

For purposes of projecting Cabazon water
supplies into the future, inflow of recycled
water increases in time to account for the
increase of wastewater generated by an
increase in population over time, and this
recycled water will be percolated into the
Cabazon Storage Unit. Once the Phase I
expansion of the WWTP is completed,
approximately 1,680 AF/yr of recycled
water will be used for irrigation purposes
and will no longer be applied to the
Cabazon Storage Unit for direct percolation.

Well NP-1 is an offline non-potable well that
is near the City’s WWTP. It was drilled more
than 20 years ago, but was never equipped
to produce groundwater. There are plans to
equip it in the near future and use it prior to
the completion of the WWTP expansion.

Once the Title 22 improvements at the
WWTP are completed, Well NP-1 will serve
as a backup and will be used sparingly to
help the City meet peak irrigation demands.

3.4.4 Banning Bench Storage Unit
The Banning Bench Storage Unit is located
to the north of the West Banning Storage
Unit, as shown in Figure 3.8. The total
surface area of the Banning Bench Storage
Unit is approximately 3,573 acres (5.9
square miles). The City currently operates
three (3) groundwater production wells
within the Banning Bench Storage Unit,
namely Wells 1, 2, and 3, with a combined
nominal pumping capacity of 3,650 gpm.

3.4.5 Banning Water Canyon Storage Unit
The Banning Water Canyon Storage Unit is
located north of the Banning Bench Storage
Unit, as depicted in Figure 3.8. The total
surface area of the Banning Water Canyon
Storage Unit is approximately 1,058 acres
(1.7 square miles). The canyon bottom
comprises alluvium, and the canyon sides
are bedrock. The City currently operates
eight (8) groundwater production wells
within the Banning Water Canyon Storage
Unit, namely Wells 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and
12, with a combined nominal pumping
capacity of 8,600 gpm.

Additional recharge occurs in the Banning
Water Canyon Storage Unit through the
diversion of Whitewater River drainage into
Banning Water Canyon. The diverted water
flows along steep mountain slopes for
approximately 14 miles in a mostly concrete
lined conveyance system known as the
Whitewater Flume. The Whitewater Flume
is described in more detail in Section 3.6.

3.5 GROUNDWATER PRODUCTION
All wells within the City’s service area are
equipped with a flowmeter to measure
water production. Water production is
481
3 - 18 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
recorded monthly by City water staff and
reported annually to DWR. Over the past
five years of operation, groundwater
extraction has averaged 7,513 AFY. Table

3.3 displays the City's groundwater supplies
for years 2015 to 2020.

Table 3.3
Groundwater-Production
Year Production (AF)
2015 6,723
2016 7,035
2017 7,576
2018 7,924
2019 7,226
2020 8,596
Average 7,513
2010-2015 Avg.
(2015 UWMP) 8,246
Due to the City's increase in population
since 2015, the rebounding effects of the
mandatory declaration period, and an
abnormally dry 2020, groundwater
pumping has increased.

3.5.1 Projected Groundwater Supplies
Currently, the City does not utilize the
entire capacity of all of its storage units
(subbasins). The maximum annual amount
pumped by the City in the past 10 years is
just under 9,000 AF. Due to the projected
developments, the City expects pumping to
increase by 25% within 10 years and over
50% by the end of this UWMP planning
period (2045). The pumping capacity of the
City’s twenty-three (23) wells, including the
City’s co-owned wells with BCVWD, is just
over 14,000 AFY. However, this mechanical
pumping capacity is actually limited to the
safe yields and/or the adjudicated rights of
the subbasins. As noted, in some of the
subbasins, the City does not maximize
groundwater resources (i.e. Cabazon Unit).

Therefore, the City will be establishing new
groundwater resources to meet projected
demands. In the interim, the City will need
to supplement their current allowable
pumping capacity by dipping into their
Beaumont Basin storage account while the
City locates and drills new wells. This will
create new resources or establish
redundancy in existing resources in order to
meet water demands under built-out
conditions. Table 3.4 below shows the City’s
projected water supplies and available
volumes. These values are also reflected in
DWR Submittal Table 6.9 in Appendix E.
482
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
3 - 19
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020
Table 3.4
Projected Water Supply Availability (AF)
Year 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Basin Projected
(Available)
Projected
(Available)
Projected
(Available)
Projected
(Available)
Projected
(Available)
Beaumont Basin
1,491 1,267 1,077 916 778
(6,700) (6,700) (6,700) (6,700) (6,700)
West Banning Basin
1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430
(1,430) (1,430) (1,430) (1,430) (1,430)
Cabazon Basin
853 960 1,054 1,136 1,208
--- --- --- --- ---
Banning Bench
1,055 1,187 1,304 1,330 1,330
(1,330) (1,330) (1,330) (1,330) (1,330)
Banning Water Canyon
3,679 3,730 3,730 3,730 3,730
(3,730) (3,730) (3,730) (3,730) (3,730)
Imported Recharge 250 500 1,000 1,750 2,500
WWTP Recharge
(Recycled Water) 1,067 1,107 2,491 2,491 2,491
Additional Supply from Storage 999 2,126 3,156 4,128 4,991 Total Available Supply 63,098 59,351 51,220 40,439 28,551 Total Net Storage 47,169 43,422 35,291 24,510 12,622
Note: See notes under Table 7.1 and notes under DWR Submittal Table 6.9 in Appendix E for a detailed explanation of the volumes above.
483
3 - 20 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
To offset dependency on the groundwater
supplies listed above, the City intends to
begin using recycled water within the next
10 years, as described in Section 4.

The City will also continue to benefit
indirectly from regional conservation efforts
and also through SGPWA’s efforts to
augment its supplies and improve reservoir
storage capacities. Section 7 discusses
reliability issues and compares the City's
projected water supply availability to
projected demands for normal, dry, and
multiple dry years through 2045.

3.6 SURFACE WATER
The Whitewater Flume was built to provide
water and power to the City and Banning
Heights Mutual Water Company (BHWMC).

BHWMC utilizes approximately 1,000 AF/yr
of the Whitewater River diversions in the
Flume (Figures 3.11 and 3.12), and the
remainder of the diverted water flows into
the San Gorgonio River below the Banning
Heights Mutual Water Company (BHMWC)
extraction point. A portion of the natural
runoff and the Whitewater River diversions
are diverted into spreading ponds located
approximately one mile north of the
Banning Bench in order to increase
groundwater recharge.

Since 1913, surface water from the
Whitewater River has been diverted into
the Banning Water Canyon Storage Unit,
with an average of 1,500 AF/yr diverted into
Banning Water Canyon since 1961. The
water flowed within the Whitewater Flume
(mentioned above in Section 3.4.5 Banning
Water Canyon Storage Unit), and then
through two hydroelectric power plants.

Figure 3.11: Whitewater Flume System
Due to damage along sections of the
Whitewater Flume, surface flow is being
diverted into Burnt Canyon to the north,
and then back to the Whitewater Flume
upstream of Powerhouse No. 1, where it
continues downstream through
Powerhouse No. 2 to an above ground
reservoir operated by Banning Heights
Mutual Water Company (BHMWC). The
remaining water flows to the San Gorgonio
River, where it recharges the Banning
Water Canyon Storage Unit.

In June of 2010, Southern California Edison
(SCE), the City of Banning, BHMWC and the
SGPWA entered into an “Agreement for
484
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
3 - 21
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020
Transfer of San Gorgonio Hydroelectric
Project No. 344 Water Conveyance Facilities”
which determined that SCE would restore
and repair the facilities and transfer
ownership to the City and BHMWC.

Figure 3.12: Whitewater Flume System
In average years the Whitewater Flume
provides direct water use to the Banning
Heights Mutual Water Company, and the
rest goes to recharging the groundwater
basins, which the City can then pump from
as groundwater. A lot of recharged water is
received during the Spring.

The Apple Fire of 2020 encompassed the
entire Whitewater Flume structure. As of
April 2021, the Whitewater Flume remains
damaged and unable to deliver water to
BHMWC and the City of Banning. SCE,
BHMWC, and the City are working together
to get the system back in operation as
quickly as possible. Southern California
Edison currently owns the Whitewater
Flume system.

The City of Banning plans to conserve
stormwater flows from tributary creeks
within its service area by allowing water to
percolate into the ground. A preliminary
evaluation by the City indicated that a
portion of stormwater flows from creeks in
the area could be conserved as "new" water
to meet future needs. The Atwell
Development (previously known as
Butterfield) includes design features that
are estimated to capture and recharge
approximately 1,370 AF/yr of stormwater
flows from Smith Creek. The Rancho San
Gorgonio Specific Plan includes design
features that are estimated to capture and
recharge approximately 199 AF/yr of
stormwater at full buildout.

3.7 ALTERNATE WATER SOURCES
This section provides an overview of
alternative water sources (non-potable
supplemental supplies) and their potential
uses. Alternative water sources include
recycled water or greywater. A more
detailed look into recycled stormwater is
found in Section 4.

3.7.1 Greywater
Greywater systems have been used in
California to provide a source of water
supply for subsurface irrigation and also as
485
3 - 22 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 3: WATER SOURCES & SUPPLIES
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
a means to reduce overall water use.

Greywater consists of water discharged
from sinks, bathtubs, dishwashers, and
washing machines. Greywater systems
consist of an underground tank and
pumping system. Greywater is currently
legal for subsurface irrigation in the State of
California; however, strict regulations and
high installation costs have impeded
installation of professional greywater
systems and have the unintended
consequence of undocumented and
noncompliant use of greywater. An
example of a Greywater System is shown
below in Figure 3.13.

Figure 3.13: Greywater System
The City does not currently have a formal
program in place to support greywater use.

However, the promotion of greywater
systems as a means to reduce the City's
overall water use is not recommended since
the use of greywater is currently limited to
subsurface irrigation and therefore the
overall service area-wide reduction in water
use (in AF) would be minimal at best.

Additionally, any water diverted to
greywater systems would no longer be
available to be treated into recycled water.

3.8 TRANSFERS OR EXCHANGES
The City’s rights to annual groundwater
extraction are shown on DWR Submittal
Table 6-9 of Appendix E. In light of pending
housing growth, this table indicates that
preservation of the City’s groundwater
supplies is imperative for the City. Thus, the
leasing of groundwater rights is not feasible
for the City. Other than the sale of water to
High Valleys Water District, and occasionally
to BHMWC, the City is not planning to enter
into any groundwater transfer or exchange
opportunities with other agencies.

The City has one 12-inch interconnection
with BCVWD that is capable of transferring
water to the City during emergencies. The
emergency connection is located at the
intersection of Sun Lakes Blvd. & Highland
Springs Ave. During the summer of 2020 the
City took water from BCVWD through this
interconnection because four (4) wells were
out of operation. Before this year, the
interconnect had not been used since 2008.

3.9 PLANNED SUPPLY PROJECTS
The City continually reviews practices that
will provide its customers with adequate
and reliable supplies. Trained staff
continues to ensure the water quality is
486
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 4: RECYCLED WATER OPPORTUNITIES
4 - 7
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020
Figure 4.3: City of Banning WWTP and Percolation Ponds
487
4 - 8 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 4: RECYCLED WATER OPPORTUNITIES
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Since the Sun
Lakes Golf Course
provides the City
with existing
recycled water
demand, other
potential users can
“tap in” to the
proposed recycled
water pipeline.

4.3.2 Potential Recycled Water Use
From an engineering standpoint, there are
no physical barriers or constraints which
would cause the construction of recycled
water facilities to be unfeasible. The City is
relatively flat within the vicinity of potential
recycled water customers. The City
currently serves one customer (Sun Lakes
Golf Course) with
non‐potable water
from Well M7 and
Well M12. Typical
annual demand for
the Sun Lakes Golf
Course is 850 AFY or

0.8 MGD. Since the
Sun Lakes Golf Course
is located on the
westerly end of the
City, once the City constructs recycled
water pipelines to reach the Sun Lakes Golf
Course, other potential customers would be
within proximity to receive recycled water.

Therefore, construction of recycled water
facilities would prove feasible if the funding
for recycled water improvements and
pipeline infrastructure was covered, at least
in-part, by developers, and an agreement
was in place for the use of recycled water.

The City would then be able to provide
recycled water to its customers.

The City’s previous 2006 Recycled Water
Master Plan identified potential customers
across the Interstate 10 Freeway. However,
the 2018 IMP indicated that these potential
customers were not feasible, due to the
difficulty with crossing the 10 Freeway and
the railroad tracks, and since there are
other potential customers south of the 10
Freeway. The potential recycled water
customers are listed in Table 4.5 below:

Table 4.5
Potential Recycled Water Users
Customer Recycled Water
Demand (AF)
Existing Customers
Sun Lakes Golf Course 850
Banning High School 175
Dysart Park 87
Lions Park 79
Projected Developments
Atwell Development 864
Rancho San Gorgonio
Development 217
Five Bridges Development 223
Neighborhood Park 35
Total 2,530
As noted by Table 4.5 above, the exception
to maintaining only recycled water users
below the 10 Freeway would be the Atwell
Development (previously known as
Butterfield), since this is a relatively large
development. In addition, it would be
within about a 1-mile distance from the Sun
Lakes Golf Course. Assuming the Sun Lakes
Golf Course is provided recycled water
488
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 4: RECYCLED WATER OPPORTUNITIES
4 - 9
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020
service prior to completion of the Atwell
Development, the pipeline can be extended
to feed the Atwell Development due to the
proximity of the pipeline. A recycled water
line to the Atwell development may be
constructed in the future, but the City does
not currently have plans to fund or
construct such a project, as reflected in the
2018 Integrated Master Plan.

4.3.3 Recycled Water Alternatives
For the Atwell Development, the City had
considered construction of a satellite
wastewater treatment facility, but has since
moved away from this idea. Instead, Atwell
will send all of its sewer discharge to the
City's WWTP. However, the City is exploring
the option of using excess recycled water
(whatever is not used for irrigation) to
recharge the West Banning Basin. This
would allow the City to make full use of its
upgraded treatment capacity.

4.4 ENCOURAGING AND OPTIMIZING

RECYCLED WATER USE
Currently, there are no methods in place to
encourage the use of recycled water, since
recycled water infrastructure has not yet
been constructed as of this UWMP. Once
the City has the capacity to provide recycle
water, then they would consider incentives
to encourage and optimize recycled water
use. This may include:
 Outreach to general public
 Outreach to potential recycled
water customers
 Monitoring, enforcement and
training for recycled water use
 Temporary financial incentives, such
as free service for the first month
The exact methods will be developed as the
City’s recycled water system expands. If the
City applies for outside funding to construct
recycled water infrastructure, the City will
need to also secure funding specifically for
the purpose of actively promoting recycled
water use.
489
4 - 10 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 4: RECYCLED WATER OPPORTUNITIES
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Figure 4.4: City of Banning Potential Recycled Water Customers 490
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 6: WATER USE
6 - 15
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020
responsible manner. Water use priority
does not differ based on income level, but is
classified by the type of use.

The residential sector projections include
projected low-income housing in
accordance with the City’s Housing Element
(http://banning.ca.us/428/Housing-Element).

Page 14 ends

projecting a total of 1,163 additional lowincome housing units to meet the City’s Housing Needs Assessment. With an
estimated 2.5 persons per unit (or about 0.6
AFY per unit), the City will need an
additional 717 AF of water per year to
supply water to these projected lower
income housing units. These low-income
water demands are included in future
projections for single family and multifamily homes listed in Table 6.6 below.

6.8.3 Projected Water Use by Sector
For planning purposes, the City's projected
water use for 2025-2045 is broken down by
sector in Table 6.6. The estimates per
sector are based on the ratios of the sectors
shown in Table 6.3 and Figure 6.4. Figure

6.9 on the following page also shows the
Projected Water Demand by Sector (in 2045).

Table 6.6
Projected Water Demand by Sector
Sector 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Water Service Area Population 38,180 45,235 52,290 59,345 66,400 Consumption Rate (GPCD)
Including 1.0% Annual Passive Savings 222 211 201 191 181 Demands
Single Family Residential 4,505 5,071 5,569 6,004 6,382 Multi-Family Residential 92 103 114 123 130
Commercial 2,263 2,548 2,798 3,016 3,206
Industrial 195 220 241 260 276
Institutional/Governmental 26 29 32 35 37
Landscape Irrigation (Potable)* 635 715 785 846 900
Landscape Irrigation ((Non-Potable) 342 385 423 456 484 Total Water Sales: 8,059 9,070 9,961 10,739 11,415
Unaccounted for Water 1,448 1,630 1,790 1,930 2,052
Total Water Consumption
(Total Supply into System): 9,507 10,701 11,751 12,670 13,467 Note: Some projected potable landscape irrigation demands may be switched to the “non-potable” category when recycled water is available 491
6 - 16 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION 6: WATER USE
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Figure 6.9: Projected Water Demand by Sector (in 2045)
Single Family
6,382 AF
Multi-Family 130 AF
Commercial
3,206 AF
Industrial
276 AF
Institutional
37 AF
Landscape
(Non-Potable)
484 AF
Landscape
(Potable)
900 AF
Loss
2,052 AF
492
Appendix C: Beaumont Basin Judgment
Water Supply Verification – Atwell Specific Plan Phase 2B 493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
Appendix D: Excerpts from 2018 Integrated Master Plan
Water Supply Verification – Atwell Specific Plan Phase 2B 520
CHAPTER 3 | INTEGRATED MASTER PLAN | CITY OF BANNING
FINAL |MARCH ͮͬͭʹ| ͯ‐ͳ
Table ͯ.ͱ Water Demand Factors
Land Use Type Abbreviation Calculated WDF
(gpd/acre)
ͮͬͭͳ IMP WDF
(gpd/acre)
Rural RUR ͭͱͬ ͭͬͬ
Very Low Density Residential VLDR ͭ,ͲͯͲ ͭ,Ͳͬͬ
Low Density Residential LDR ͮ,ͯͯͰ ͮ,ͯͬͬ
Medium Density Residential MDR ͮ,ͳͲͯ ͮ,ʹͬͬ
High Density Residential HDR ͯ,ͬͱͯ ͯ,ͭͬͬ
Commercial COM ͱ,ͮͳͱ ͱ,ͯͬͬ
Industrial IND ͭ,ͲͳͰ ͭ,ͳͬͬ
Open Space ‐ Parks OS‐P ͭ,ͬͭ͵ ͭ,ͬͬͬ
Public Facilities PF ͯͳͯ Ͱͬͬ
Schools PF‐S ͯ,ͱͬͮ ͯ,ͱͬͬ
Notes:
(ͭ) WDFs calculated based on ͮͬͭͲ billing data and scaled up to average of ͮͬͭͮ‐ͮͬͭͰ demands.

As shown in Table ͯ.ͱ, the calculated WDFs for the City’s land uses range between ͭͬͬ for rural areas to ͱ,ͯͬͬ for commercial areas.

3.1.2.3 Potable Water Peaking Factors
Peaking Factors (PF) are typically used to determine the water demands for conditions other than ADD conditions. Peaking factors account for fluctuations in demands on a seasonal or hourly basis. For example, during hot summer days, water use is typically higher than on a cold winter day due to increased irrigation demands.

Common PFs include factors for Maximum Day Demands (MDD) and Minimum Day Demands (MinDD). PFs are determined using the water system demands for a selected period and dividing the quantity by the ADD. The MDD factor, for example, is determined by comparing the water demands for the day of the year with the highest daily water demand to the ADD.

The peaking factors determined in this report include:
 Monthly Peaking Factors.
 Daily Peaking Factors.

These PFs not only reflect a different time scale, but are often calculated using different data sources. The City’s PFs and data used to establish these are discussed below.

Monthly Peaking Factors
Monthly PFs represent the seasonal demand variation on a monthly basis, such as the MMD and MinMD factors. In the absence of daily production data for an entire calendar year, these factors can be established using monthly production summaries or historical billing data. The City’s monthly peaking factors based on historical monthly production are summarized in Table ͯ.Ͳ.

Since year ͮͬͭͱ demands were much lower due to conservation mandates, it is not included in this calculation.
521
UT
UTUTUT
UTUT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UTUT
UT
UT
UT
UT
UT
")
=
")
=
!ã
!ã !ã !ã !ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã !ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
!ã
#*
#*
!([
!([ !([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([
!([

BLUFF ST

SUN LAKES BLVD

HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE

HATHAWAY ST

SAN GORGONIO AVE

GILMAN ST

WESTWARD AVE

RAMSEY ST

WILSON ST
§¨¦10
8TH ST

LINCOLN ST

SUNSET AVE

CHARLES ST
Hargrave &
John St PRV San Gorgonio
& Lincoln PRV
South Mountain
Water Valve
Banning Water
Canyon PRV
Wells 1-12
Foothill East PRV &
Proposed Foothill
East 2 PRV
Southwest
Reservoir
San Gorgonio
Reservoirs
Sunset
Reservoirs
Brinton Reservoir
& Proposed
Foothill West PS
High Valley Tank
& Altitude Valve
Well M3
Well M10 Well M11
Well C3
Well C6
Proposed
Upper Main
Reservoirs
Proposed
Mountain North
Reservoir
Proposed
Foothill West
Reservoir
Fire Flow PRV
Woodland
& Lincoln
PRV 16th
& Hays
Well C9
PRV 8th St
& George
PRV 8th St &
Jacento View
PRV 4th St
& Wilson
PRV San Gorgonio
& Gilman
PRV Theodore
& Almond
Well C4
Well C5
Well C2,
Well C2 Forebay,
C2 Booster PS
Well C8

RSG PRV
Well C10
Well M7
Well M12
Proposed
Zone 1
Reservoir
Last Revised: February 13, 2018 \\io-fs-1\Data\GIS\GISBackup\Banning\MXD\Figure6.11_FutureSystemMaxPressures.mxd CHAPTER 6 | INTEGRATED MASTER PLAN | CITY OF BANNING
Figure 6.11 Future (2040) System Maximum Pressures with Re-zoning O
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
Disclaimer: Features shown in this
figure are for planning purposes and
represent approximate locations.

Engineering and/or survey accuracy
is not implied.

Data Sources: ESRI, Banning
Legend
Pressure > 150 psi
!([ New PRV
!ã Future Well
")
= Future PS
UT Future Tank
Future Pipeline
!([ Existing Valve
#* Existing BCVWD Interconnection
!ã Existing Well
")
= Existing PS
UT Existing Tank
Existing Pipeline
City Boundary
Parcel
Freeway
Pressure Zone
Foothill East Pressure Zone
Mountain North Pressure Zone
Lower I Pressure Zone
Lower Main Pressure Zone
Foothill West Pressure Zone
Mountain South Pressure Zone
Upper Main Pressure Zone
522
Appendix E: California Government Code Section 66473.7
Water Supply Verification – Atwell Specific Plan Phase 2B 523
Code: Select Code Section: 1 or 2 or 1001 Search
TITLE 7. PLANNING AND LAND USE [65000 - 66499.58] ( Heading of Title 7 amended by Stats. 1974, Ch. 1536. ) DIVISION 2. SUBDIVISIONS [66410 - 66499.41] ( Division 2 added by Stats. 1974, Ch. 1536. ) CHAPTER 4. Requirements [66473 - 66498] ( Chapter 4 added by Stats. 1974, Ch. 1536. ) 66473.7.

Up^ << Previous Next >> cross-reference chaptered bills PDF | Add To My Favorites Search Phrase: Highlight

GOVERNMENT CODE - GOV
ARTICLE 1. General [66473 - 66474.10] ( Article 1 added by Stats. 1974, Ch. 1536. ) (a) For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
(1) “Subdivision” means a proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, except that for a public water system that has fewer than 5,000 service connections, “subdivision” means any proposed residential development that would account for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of the public water system’s existing service connections.
(2) “Sufficient water supply” means the total water supplies available during normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years within a 20-year projection that will meet the projected demand associated with the proposed subdivision, in addition to existing and planned future uses, including, but not limited to, agricultural and industrial uses. In determining “sufficient water supply,” all of the following factors shall be considered:
(A) The availability of water supplies over a historical record of at least 20 years. (B) The applicability of an urban water shortage contingency analysis prepared pursuant to Section 10632 of the Water Code that includes actions to be undertaken by the public water system in response to water supply shortages.
(C) The reduction in water supply allocated to a specific water use sector pursuant to a resolution or ordinance adopted, or a contract entered into, by the public water system, as long as that resolution, ordinance, or contract does not conflict with Section 354 of the Water Code. (D) The amount of water that the water supplier can reasonably rely on receiving from other water supply projects, such as conjunctive use, reclaimed water, water conservation, and water transfer, including programs identified under federal, state, and local water initiatives such as CALFED and Colorado River tentative agreements, to the extent that these water supplies meet the criteria of subdivision (d). (E) If a proposed subdivision relies in whole or in part on groundwater, the following factors:
(i) For a basin for which a court or the State Water Resources Control Board has adjudicated the rights to pump groundwater, the order or decree adopted by the court or the State Water Resources Control Board. (ii) For a basin that has not been adjudicated, as follows:
(I) For a basin designated as high- or medium-priority pursuant to Section 10722.4 of the Water Code, the most recently adopted or revised adopted groundwater sustainability plan or approved alternative. If there is no adopted groundwater sustainability plan or approved alternative, information as to whether the Department of Water Resources has identified the basin or basins as overdrafted or has projected that the basin will become overdrafted if present management conditions continue. (II) For a basin designated as low- or very low priority pursuant to Section 10722.4 of the Water Code, information as to whether the Department of Water Resources has identified the basin or basins as Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites 524
overdrafted or has projected that the basin will become overdrafted if present management conditions continue.
(3) “Public water system” means the water supplier that is, or may become as a result of servicing the subdivision included in a tentative map pursuant to subdivision (b), a public water system, as defined in Section 10912 of the Water Code, that may supply water for a subdivision. (b) (1) The legislative body of a city or county or the advisory agency, to the extent that it is authorized by local ordinance to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the tentative map, shall include as a condition in any tentative map that includes a subdivision a requirement that a sufficient water supply shall be available. Proof of the availability of a sufficient water supply shall be requested by the subdivision applicant or local agency, at the discretion of the local agency, and shall be based on written verification from the applicable public water system within 90 days of a request.
(2) If the public water system fails to deliver the written verification as required by this section, the local agency or any other interested party may seek a writ of mandamus to compel the public water system to comply. (3) If the written verification provided by the applicable public water system indicates that the public water system is unable to provide a sufficient water supply that will meet the projected demand associated with the proposed subdivision, then the local agency may make a finding, after consideration of the written verification by the applicable public water system, that additional water supplies not accounted for by the public water system are, or will be, available prior to completion of the subdivision that will satisfy the requirements of this section.

This finding shall be made on the record and supported by substantial evidence. (4) If the written verification is not provided by the public water system, notwithstanding the local agency or other interested party securing a writ of mandamus to compel compliance with this section, then the local agency may make a finding that sufficient water supplies are, or will be, available prior to completion of the subdivision that will satisfy the requirements of this section. This finding shall be made on the record and supported by substantial evidence.
(c) The applicable public water system’s written verification of its ability or inability to provide a sufficient water supply that will meet the projected demand associated with the proposed subdivision as required by subdivision (b) shall be supported by substantial evidence. The substantial evidence may include, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(1) The public water system’s most recently adopted urban water management plan adopted pursuant to Part 2.6 (commencing with Section 10610) of Division 6 of the Water Code. (2) A water supply assessment that was completed pursuant to Part 2.10 (commencing with Section 10910) of Division 6 of the Water Code.
(3) A groundwater sustainability plan adopted or alternative approved pursuant to Part 2.74 (commencing with Section 10720) of Division 6 of the Water Code.
(4) Other information relating to the sufficiency of the water supply that contains analytical information that is substantially similar to the assessment required by Section 10635 of the Water Code. (d) When the written verification pursuant to subdivision (b) relies on projected water supplies that are not currently available to the public water system, to provide a sufficient water supply to the subdivision, the written verification as to those projected water supplies shall be based on all of the following elements, to the extent each is applicable:
(1) Written contracts or other proof of valid rights to the identified water supply that identify the terms and conditions under which the water will be available to serve the proposed subdivision. (2) Copies of a capital outlay program for financing the delivery of a sufficient water supply that has been adopted by the applicable governing body.
(3) Securing of applicable federal, state, and local permits for construction of necessary infrastructure associated with supplying a sufficient water supply.
(4) Any necessary regulatory approvals that are required in order to be able to convey or deliver a sufficient water supply to the subdivision. 525
(e) If there is no public water system, the local agency shall make a written finding of sufficient water supply based on the evidentiary requirements of subdivisions (c) and (d) and identify the mechanism for providing water to the subdivision.
(f) In making any findings or determinations under this section, a local agency, or designated advisory agency, may work in conjunction with the project applicant and the public water system to secure water supplies sufficient to satisfy the demands of the proposed subdivision. If the local agency secures water supplies pursuant to this subdivision, which supplies are acceptable to and approved by the governing body of the public water system as suitable for delivery to customers, it shall work in conjunction with the public water system to implement a plan to deliver that water supply to satisfy the long-term demands of the proposed subdivision. (g) The written verification prepared under this section shall also include a description, to the extent that data is reasonably available based on published records maintained by federal and state agencies, and public records of local agencies, of the reasonably foreseeable impacts of the proposed subdivision on the availability of water resources for agricultural and industrial uses within the public water system’s service area that are not currently receiving water from the public water system but are utilizing the same sources of water. To the extent that those reasonably foreseeable impacts have previously been evaluated in a document prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code) or the National Environmental Policy Act (Public Law 91-190) for the proposed subdivision, the public water system may utilize that information in preparing the written verification. (h) Where a water supply for a proposed subdivision includes groundwater, the public water system serving the proposed subdivision shall evaluate, based on substantial evidence, the extent to which it or the landowner has the right to extract the additional groundwater needed to supply the proposed subdivision. Nothing in this subdivision is intended to modify state law with regard to groundwater rights. (i) This section shall not apply to any residential project proposed for a site that is within an urbanized area and has been previously developed for urban uses, or where the immediate contiguous properties surrounding the residential project site are, or previously have been, developed for urban uses, or housing projects that are exclusively for very low and low-income households.
(j) The determinations made pursuant to this section shall be consistent with the obligation of a public water system to grant a priority for the provision of available and future water resources or services to proposed housing developments that help meet the city’s or county’s share of the regional housing needs for lower income households, pursuant to Section 65589.7.
(k) The County of San Diego shall be deemed to comply with this section if the Office of Planning and Research determines that all of the following conditions have been met:
(1) A regional growth management strategy that provides for a comprehensive regional strategy and a coordinated economic development and growth management program has been developed pursuant to Proposition C as approved by the voters of the County of San Diego in November 1988, which required the development of a regional growth management plan and directed the establishment of a regional planning and growth management review board.
(2) Each public water system, as defined in Section 10912 of the Water Code, within the County of San Diego has adopted an urban water management plan pursuant to Part 2.6 (commencing with Section 10610) of the Water Code.
(3) The approval or conditional approval of tentative maps for subdivisions, as defined in this section, by the County of San Diego and the cities within the county requires written communications to be made by the public water system to the city or county, in a format and with content that is substantially similar to the requirements contained in this section, with regard to the availability of a sufficient water supply, or the reliance on projected water supplies to provide a sufficient water supply, for a proposed subdivision. (l) Nothing in this section shall preclude the legislative body of a city or county, or the designated advisory agency, at the request of the applicant, from making the determinations required in this section earlier than required pursuant to subdivision (b).
(m) Nothing in this section shall be construed to create a right or entitlement to water service or any specific level of water service.
(n) Nothing in this section is intended to change existing law concerning a public water system’s obligation to provide water service to its existing customers or to any potential future customers. 526 (o) Any action challenging the sufficiency of the public water system’s written verification of a sufficient water supply shall be governed by Section 66499.37.
(Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 594, Sec. 1. (SB 1262) Effective January 1, 2017.) 527
528

CITY OF BANNING

STAFF REPORT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Douglas Schulze, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Nate Smith, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer Art Vela, Director of Public Works
MEETING DATE: December 10, 2024
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution 2024-190, Approving Final Tract Maps 37388, 37388-7, and 37388-8 and Release the Maps for Recordation; Authorize Staff to Sign the Subdivision Improvement Agreements and Final Tract Maps; Accept Faithful Performance and Labor Bonds for Public Improvements
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2024-190.

BACKGROUND:

Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 37388 was approved by City Council on January 10, 2023 as Resolution 2023-04. The proposed map implements the Atwell Specific Plan (also known as the Butterfield Specific Plan; “Specific Plan”) originally approved by the City Council in March of 2012, with minor modifications approved in 2017 and provides for the development as allowed by the Specific Plan.

The applicant has processed the final 3 Final Maps for portions of the approved Tentative Tract Map, as permitted by the Subdivision Map Act. The first three final maps (FM 37388-1, FM 37388-2, & FM 37388- 3) were approved by City Council on February 27, 2024. The next three maps (FM 37388-4, FM 37388- 5, FM 37388-6) were approved by City Council on May 28, 2024 with Resolution 2024-77. The final three maps are ready for approval. Final Tract Map 37388-7 subdivides a portion of Planning Area 14 with 68 residential lots and 10 street and open space lots. Final Tract Map 37388-8 subdivides a portion of Planning Area 16A into 52 residential lots and 5 street and open space lots. Final Tract Map 37388 subdivides a portion of Planning Area 16B into 31 residential lots and 3 street lots. All three maps are consistent with the approved Tentative Tract Map and Conditions of Approval.

Prior to bringing these maps to City Council for recordation, Tri-Pointe Homes was required to obtain an Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for proposed changes and impacts to the existing Smith Creek in the area to be subdivided. These agreements have been obtained and provided to the City as required in the Conditions of Approval.

Further, as these maps impact areas identified as a Zone A Floodplain by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the applicant was required to show that storm water flows can be mitigated to not cause flooding within the project or downstream. This is achieved by the construction of a large interim storm water detention basin north of the Southern California Edison powerline easement to reduce peak storm water flow through the project site. This was demonstrated with the preparation of a Conditional Letter of Map Approval (CLOMR) prepared and processed by the City of Banning and FEMA for the entirety of the project. The proposed interim basin was checked for consistency with the project CLOMR. Tri-Pointe Homes is continuing to work with the Riverside County Flood Control District 529
(RCFCD), CDFW, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) on the final design for the Smith Creek Detention Facility that would be the replacement for the interim basin and maintained by RCFCD.

When these maps are recorded, the subdivision of Atwell Phase 2B and Tentative Tract Map 37388 will be complete.

JUSTIFICATION:

Final Maps 37388, 37388-7, and 37388-8, were checked by the City’s consulting surveyor and were found to be technically correct and conform to the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. All Conditions of Approval required to be met prior to the recording have been met. The City Engineer has verified that the final maps are in substantial conformance with the approved TTM 37388.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact based on the approval of final maps. However, the recordation of the maps allows for the development of the project which will increase the assessed value of the properties resulting in an increase in property tax revenue. Additionally, the project will generate development impact fee revenues. The City’s cost for processing the project will be offset by processing fees.

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not adopt Resolution 2024-190 and provide staff with additional direction.

BUDGETED?:

No
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT:

Yes
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2024-190, FM 37388-7, FM 37388-8, and FM 37388

2. Exhibit A 37388-7 TRACT MAP.pdf

3. Exhibit B 37388-7 SIA.pdf

4. Exhibit C 37388-8 TRACT MAP.pdf

5. Exhibit D 37388-8 SIA.pdf

6. Exhibit E 37388 TRACT MAP.pdf

7. Exhibit F 37388 SIA.pdf

8. Att 1 - Atwell Composite Site Plan 2024_0115.pdf

9. Att 2 - Reso 2023-04 TTM 37388.pdf

10. Att 3 - TR 37388-7 Bonds.pdf

11. Att 4 - TR 37388-8 Bonds.pdf
530
Resolution 2024-190

Page 1 of 9 ends

RESOLUTION 2024-190

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NOS. 37388, 37388-7, AND 37388-8; AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SIGN THE FINAL TRACT MAPS AND SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS; RELEASING THE MAPS FOR RECORDATION; AND ACCEPTING THE PERFORMANCE AND

LABOR AND MATERIAL BONDS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 37388 was approved by City Council on January 10, 2023. The proposed map implements the Atwell Specific Plan (also known as the Butterfield Specific Plan; “Specific Plan”) originally approved by the City Council in March of 2012, with minor modifications approved in 2017 and provides for the development as allowed by the Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, Final Tract Map (TM) No. 37388, 37388-7, and 37388-8 will subdivide approximately 43.06 acres of vacant land into 151 numbered lots and 18 lettered lots for street and public utility and public park purposes; and is located north of Meadowline Way and west of Highland Home Road within the Specific Plan area; and
WHEREAS, the property owner has signed a Subdivision Agreement and has submitted bonds to assure that the required improvements including street, sewer, water, and storm drain improvements are constructed; and
WHEREAS, the TM 37388-7, 37388-8, and 37388 have been deemed technically correct and that they conform to the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the City Engineer has verified that TM 37388-7, TM 37388-8, and TM 37388 are in substantial conformance with the approved TTM 37388.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council approves TM 37388-7, TM 37388-8, and TM 37388, copies of which is hereby attached as Exhibit “A”, Exhibit “C”, and Exhibit “E” and made part of this Resolution.

SECTION 2. The City Council approves the execution of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement to be signed by the Mayor which is hereby attached as Exhibit “B”, Exhibit “D” and Exhibit “F” and directs the Administrative City Clerk to transmit TM 37388-7, TM 37388-8, and TM 37388 to the County Recorder of the County of Riverside for recordation.

SECTION 3. The City Council accepts the performance and labor and material bonds and authorize staff to sign the final maps.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December 2024.

Mayor
City of Banning
531
Resolution 2024-190

Page 2 of 9 ends

ATTEST:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Serita R. Young, City Attorney
Richards, Watson & Gershon
532
Resolution 2024-190

Page 3 of 9 ends

CERTIFICATION:

I, Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2024-190, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 10th day of December, 2024 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Caroline Patton, Administrative City Clerk
City of Banning, California
533
Resolution 2024-190

Page 4 of 9 ends

Exhibit A
Final Tract Map 37388-7
534
Resolution 2024-190

Page 5 of 9 ends

Exhibit B
Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Final Tract Map 37388-7 535
Resolution 2024-190

Page 6 of 9 ends

Exhibit C
Final Tract Map 37388-8
536
Resolution 2024-190

Page 7 of 9 ends

Exhibit D
Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Final Tract Map 37388-8 537
Resolution 2024-190

Page 8 of 9 ends

Exhibit E
Final Tract Map 37388
538
Resolution 2024-190

Page 9 of 9 ends

Exhibit F
Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Final Tract Map 37388 539

TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE
ESTIMATED TO BE $ ___________________ .

MATTHEW JENNINGS, COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR

TAX BOND CERTIFICATE
DATED: __________________________ , 20___ .

CASH OR SURETY TAX BOND

MATTHEW JENNINGS
DATED: __________________________ , 20_____ .

BOND HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE, AS OF THIS DATE, THERE

ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY,

MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR

SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES NOW A LIEN, BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHICH ARE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF $ ___________ HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED

WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED

UPON THE PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL, AND ALL SPECIAL

ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, WHICH AT THE TIME OF FILING OF THIS MAP WITH THE

COUNTY RECORDER ARE A LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE AND SAID BY: _________________________________ , DEPUTY

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
BY: ____________________________ , DEPUTY
SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE BY:

FILED THIS DAY OF , 20
AT M. IN BOOK OF MAPS,

AT PAGES AT THE REQUEST

OF THE CLERK OF THE CITY OF BANNING

PETER ALDANA, COUNTY ASSESSOR -
BY: DEPUTY
FEE
NO.

RECORDER'S STATEMENT
THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP.

SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
DATE: ________________ , 20___ .

THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY

IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF TRI POINTE HOMES IN JUNE, 2023. I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL MONUMENTS

ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED, OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN

ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP AND THAT THE

MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED, AND THAT DARYL J. CHRISTIAN L.S. 8554

CLERK - RECORDER
SIGNATURE OMISSIONS: SEE SHEET 2
ON 20 , BEFORE ME, , A NOTARY PUBLIC,
WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE

SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/

HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF

COUNTY OF

WITNESS MY HAND

STATE OF
PERSONALLY APPEARED _____________________________________________________________________

NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/

SIGNATURE
FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

I CERTIFY UNDER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE

PRINT NAME

PENALTY OF PERJURY

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE

VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE

DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.
)
)
) SS
NUMBERED LOTS:

THIS SUBDIVISON CONTAINS
68 THIS SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN.
1 COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
EASEMENT NOTES: SEE SHEET 2
LETTERED LOTS: 10
ABANDONMENT NOTES:

PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 66499.20.1/2 AND 66434(g) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT THE FILING OF THIS MAP SHALL

CONSTITUTE THE ABANDONMENT OF ALL EASEMENTS RIGHTS FOR ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THIS MAP WHICH WERE CREATED BY THE RECORDATION OF TRACT NO. 35966, FILED IN BOOK 473, PAGES 94 THROUGH 107, INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, NOT SHOWN ON THIS MAP.

CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT

CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF BANNING
DATE: ____________________ , 20____ .

I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE WITHIN MAP, THAT THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN THEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 37388 WHICH WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF BANNING CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 10, 2023, AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT (DIVISION 2 OF TITLE 7 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE) AND CHAPTER 22 OF THE BANNING MUNICIPAL CODE APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF NATHAN C. SMITH, RCE 74754
THE APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S STATEMENT
THE TENTATIVE MAP WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 10, 2023.

DAVID A. NEWELL

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATED:

CITY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT SAID MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.

ENGINEERING RESOURCES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
DATE: _______________________ , 20____ .

BY: ROBERT C. OLLERTON, PLS 7731
GROSS AREA: 26.80 ACRES
DARYL J. CHRISTIAN

WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN

HEREON, THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO

SAID LAND, THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE.

TRI POINTE HOMES IE-SD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,

OWNER'S STATEMENT
NAME: MICHAEL C. TAYLOR
TITLE: DIVISION PRESIDENT

CITY CLERK
DATED:

BY:

THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:

WE ALSO HEREBY RESERVE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP:

1. LOTS 'E' THROUGH 'H', INCLUSIVE, FOR OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES.

2. LOT 'E' AND 'H' FOR SIDEWALK AND TRAIL PURPOSES.

CITY ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
I, ____________________________ CITY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEETING HELD ON THE ______ DAY OF _________________________ , 20 ____ , DULY APPROVED THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION, AND ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC AS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION:

BANNING, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SAID CITY COUNCIL AT ITS REGULAR

LOTS 'A' THROUGH 'D', INCLUSIVE, FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, SUBJECT TO IMPROVEMENT.

1. 2. THE NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENTS LYING ADJACENT TO LOTS 'A' THROUGH 'D', INCLUSIVE, AS SHOWN HEREON. THE DEDICATION IS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.

3. THE 3' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENTS LYING ADJACENT TO THE SIDE LINES OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 68, INCLUSIVE, AS SHOWN HEREON. THE DEDICATION IS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.

4. THE NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENT OVER LOTS 'E' AND 'H' FOR SIDEWALK AND/OR TRAIL PARKING PURPOSES.

5. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF BANNING, LOTS 'A' THROUGH 'D', INCLUSIVE, FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.

1. 2. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF BANNING THE NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENTS LYING ADJACENT TO LOTS 'A' THROUGH 'D', INCLUSIVE, AS SHOWN HEREON. THE DEDICATION IS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.

3. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF BANNING THE 3' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENTS LYING ADJACENT TO THE SIDE LINES OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 68, INCLUSIVE, AS SHOWN HEREON.

THE DEDICATION IS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.

4. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF BANNING A NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENT OVER LOTS 'E' AND 'H' FOR SIDEWALK AND/OR TRAIL PURPOSES.

5. PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 66499.20.1/2 AND 66434(g) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT THE FILING OF THIS MAP SHALL

CONSTITUTE THE ABANDONMENT OF THAT PORTION OF THE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES RECORDED OCTOBER 13, 2022 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2022-0428552, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OR THIS MAP, AND NOT SHOWN ON THIS MAP.

FORMERLY KNOWN AS PARDEE

HOMES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
TOTAL LOTS: 78

WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF BANNING A NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENT OVER LOT 'I' FOR ACCESS, PARK AND VEHICLE PARKING PURPOSES.

THE NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENT OVER LOT 'I' FOR ACCESS, PARK AND VEHICLE SHEET OF 10 SHEETS
I:\89410\MAPPING\TR 37388-7 9-17-2024

IN THE CITY OF BANNING, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 37388-7
DARYL J. CHRISTIAN, L.S. 8554 MDS CONSULTING JANUARY, 2024 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 8 AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 4, 5, 7, 18, 19 AND LETTERED LOTS D, F AND H, ALL OF TRACT NO. 35966, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 473, PAGES 94 THROUGH 107, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS WITHIN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.

IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING

3. LOT 'I' FOR PARK, VEHICLE PARKING, LANDSCAPE AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES.

4. LOT 'J' FOR RECREATION, LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES.

5. LOT 'H' FOR STORM DRAIN, DRAINAGE AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES.

6. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF BANNING THE 3' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENTS LYING WITHIN LOTS 'E', 'F', 'G' AND 'H', AS SHOWN HEREON. THE DEDICATION IS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.

6. THE 3' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENTS LYING WITHIN LOTS 'E', 'F', 'G' AND 'H', AS SHOWN HEREON. THE DEDICATION IS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.

7. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF BANNING A NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENT OVER LOT 'H'' FOR STORM DRAIN, DRAINAGE AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES.

MAINTENANCE PURPOSES.

7. THE NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENT OVER LOT 'H' FOR STORM DRAIN, DRAINAGE, AND 540
2 PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436(a)(3) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE SIGNATURES OF

THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS AND/OR OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED, AS THEIR INTERESTS CANNOT RIPEN INTO FEE.

SIGNATURE OMISSIONS:

SOILS REPORT:

PURSUANT TO SECTION 66490 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, A PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT, PREPARED BY GEOCON WEST, INC., PROJECT NO. T2305-22-14, DATED DECEMBER 21, 2021, IS ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF BANNING, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HOLDER OF A RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES AND CANALS AS RESERVED IN THE PATENT RECORDED DECEMBER 1, 1919 IN BOOK 8, PAGE 40 OF PATENTS.

WILSON STREET HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVENUE HIGHLAND HOME ROAD SUNSET AVENUE INTERSTATE 10
BEDROCK OUTCROPPING PER M.B.
2171990.406
FD. 5/8" STAINLESS STEEL CENTER

PUNCH PIN, FLUSH, IN SANDSTONE

TRAK (BOMMER CANYON)
6088762.992
427/65-70 & M.B. 429/84-103.

OF BRASS DISK STAMPED STA.
2257398.558
FD. 1" STAINLESS STEEL ROD IN
LARGE BOULDER UP 1.0', 50' N.W.

MATH (LAKE MATHEWS)
6201355.292
57+82.57 PER M.B. 427/65-70
& M.B. 429/84-103.

GRID MEAS. & REC. PER M.B. 427/65-70 & M.B. 429/84-103) (N 52°49'02.84" E 141320.84'
(N 67°17'48.05" E 289248.38' GRID) PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE
8TH STREET
FD 1" I.P. W/SPIKE IN CENTER,
NO TAG, DN. 0.2', ACC. AS S.E.

R.S. 123/72-77 & M.B. 429/84-103.

COR. SEC. 1, T3S, R1W, SBM, PER
TRACT NO.
37298-1
(5337.44' GRID)
(N88°31'11"W 5338.03')

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

BASIS OF BEARINGS AND COORDINATES NOTE
ALL DISTANCES ARE GROUND DISTANCES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

THE BASIS OF BEARINGS AND COORDINATES FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE PER NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY, NAD 83, EPOCH 1995.5) BASED ON CONTROL STATIONS "TRAK" AND "MATH" AS SHOWN HEREON.

CALIFORNIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 6, (POSITIONS

GRID DISTANCES MAY BE OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES BY AN AVERAGE COMBINATION FACTOR OF 0.99988764.

NN
FD 1" I.P. W/SPIKE IN CENTER,
NO TAG, DN. 0.2', ACC. AS S.E.

R.S. 123/72-77 & M.B. 429/84-103.

COR. SEC. 1, T3S, R1W, SBM, PER
-0.°22'23.90"

CONVERGENCE
ANGLE

SOUTHERN SIERRAS POWER COMPANY, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED DECEMBER 1, 1919 IN BOOK 8, PAGE 40 OF PATENTS.

TRACT NO.
37388-7

CITY OF BANNING, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ELECTRIC UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED OCTOBER 13, 2022 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2022-0428552, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (N 78°27'06.21" E 157451.64' GRID)
TRACT NO.
37389-1
EASEMENT NOTES:

A EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN SIERRAS POWER COMPANY, RECORDED DECEMBER 1, 1919 IN BOOK 8, PAGE 40, OF PATENTS.

LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM RECORD INFORMATION.

B RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES AND CANALS IN FAVOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RECORDED DECEMBER 1, 1919 IN BOOK 8, PAGE 40, OF PATENTS.

LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM RECORD INFORMATION.

TRACT NO.
35967
(5290.83' GRID)
(N00°13'14"W 5291.42')

INDICATES VARIABLE WIDTH NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT OVER LOTS 'A' THROUGH 'D', INCLUSIVE, FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF BANNING, AS SHOWN HEREON. 1 5
4 2 INDICATES NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENT LYING ADJACENT TO LOTS 'A' THROUGH 'D', INCLUSIVE, DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF BANNING FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, AS SHOWN HEREON.

INDICATES NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENT OVER LOTS 'E' AND 'H', DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF BANNING FOR SIDEWALK AND/OR TRAIL PURPOSES, AS SHOWN HEREON.
3 INDICATES 3' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENTS, LYING ADJACENT TO THE SIDE LINES OF LOTS 1 THORUGH 68, INCLUSIVE, DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF BANNING FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, AS SHOWN HEREON.

INDICATES NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENT OVER LOT 'I', DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF BANNING FOR ACCESS, PARK AND VEHICLE PARKING PURPOSES, AS SHOWN HEREON.

M.B. 473/94-107 & M.B. 485/68-75.

FD 1" I.P., W/TAG, RCE 25742, DN. 1.8', ACC.

AS SECTION CORNER PER R.S. 123/72-77,
FD 1 1/2" BRASS CAP MARKED AS SHOWN,
DN. 0.4', ACC. AS SECTION CORNER PER R.S.

R.S. 123/72-77 & M.B. 429/84-103.

SHEET OF 10 SHEETS
I:\89410\MAPPING\TR 37388-7 9-17-2024

IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING 6 INDICATES 3' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENTS, LYING WITHIN LOTS 'E', 'F', 'G' AND 'H', AS SHOWN HEREON. DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF BANNING FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, INDICATES VARIOUS 10' WIDE EASEMENTS IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF BANNING FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, RECORDED OCTOBER 13, 2022, AS DOCUMENT NO. 2022-0428552, O.R.

C
7 INDICATES NON-EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENT OVER LOT 'H', DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF BANNING FOR STORM DRAIN, DRAINAGE AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES, AS SHOWN HEREON. 541
SHEET OF 10 SHEETS
I:\89410\MAPPING\TR 37388-7 9-17-2024

IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING

C MEADOWLINE WAY
STREET
APEX

RAINTREE PLACE

SURVEYOR'S NOTES

BOUNDARY SURVEY HIGHLAND HOME ROAD
3 WILSON STREET

L MERCURY
AVENUE
DETAIL "B" C HIGHLAND HOME ROAD L

DOCUMENT REFERENCE

ABBREVIATIONS
SEE SHEET 4

DOUGLAS AVENUE

TAMARACK LANE

EUREKA AVENUE
542
SHEET OF 10 SHEETS
I:\89410\MAPPING\TR 37388-7 9-17-2024

IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING 4 MEADOWLINE WAY

DOUGLAS

APEX STREET
AVENUE
543
SHEET OF 10 SHEETS
I:\89410\MAPPING\TR 37388-7 9-17-2024

IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING 5 INDEX MAP
66 LOT 'H'

LOT 'E' LOT 'F'

LOT 'G'

LOT 'J'
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25
65 67 68
64 63 62 61 60
59 58 57 56 55 54
53 52 51 50 49 48
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46
47 28 27 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

LOT 'I'

LOT 'D' LANE

DOUGLAS AVENUE
LEMON

LOT 'B'

LOT 'C'

TAMARACK LANE

EUREKA AVENUE

LOT 'A' APEX STREET
6 9
9 7
7 6
10 MEADOWLINE WAY
8 8
544
SHEET OF 10 SHEETS
I:\89410\MAPPING\TR 37388-7 9-17-2024

IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING

TAMARACK LANE

DOUGLAS AVENUE

LOT 'D'

LOT 'C'
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
60 61 62 63 64 65
59 58 57 56 55 54
53 49 50 51 52
48 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
LEMON

LOT 'B'

LOT 'I'

LOT 'H'
6 LANE
545
SHEET OF 10 SHEETS
I:\89410\MAPPING\TR 37388-7 9-17-2024

IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING 7 EUREKA AVENUE

TAMARACK LANE

LOT 'A'

LOT 'C'

LOT 'E'
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
48 49 50 51 52
37 38 39 40 41 42
35 34 33 32 31
36 LANE

LOT 'B'
21 30
43 29
44 22
LEMON

MEADOWLINE WAY

LOT 'H'
53 546
SHEET OF 10 SHEETS
I:\89410\MAPPING\TR 37388-7 9-17-2024

IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING 8 LOT 'J'
68 67
66 65
54 53

LOT 'I'

DOUGLAS AVENUE

LOT 'D'
44 APEX STREET
45 46 47

TAMARACK

LOT 'C'

LANE LANE
64 547
SHEET OF 10 SHEETS
I:\89410\MAPPING\TR 37388-7 9-17-2024

IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING 9 APEX STREET LOT 'F'

LOT 'I'
21 22 23 24 25
53 43 44 45
46 47
26 27
30 29 28

TAMARACK

LOT 'C'
LANE

EUREKA AVENUE

LOT 'A'

LOT 'E'

MEADOWLINE WAY APEX STREET

EUREKA AVENUE
LANE

TAMARACK LOT 'G'

LOT 'J'
548
SHEET OF 10 SHEETS
I:\89410\MAPPING\TR 37388-7 9-17-2024

IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING 10 12
11 10
9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 13 14
15 LOT 'H'

MEADOWLINE WAY MERCURY AVENUE

EUREKA AVENUE
LEMON
LANE
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575