Beaumont City Council
August 20, 2024

BEAUMONT
leuta
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
(951) 769-8520
www.ci.beaumont.ca.us
Case No./V.0).1 --bsilo
Receipt No. VDA\D'
Fee $
Date Paid
6 -Ina. only

BOND EXONERATION APPLICATION
Bond Type: ❑Performance ®Maintenance ❑Final Monument Inspection ❑Other:

1. Contact' s Name Rick Rush
Phone (951) 529-7795

2. Contact's Address 1250 Corona Pointe Court Suite 600 Corona, CA 92879

5. Contact's E-mail [email protected]

3. Developer Name Pardee Homes Phone (951) 529-7795
City/State/Zip
(If corporation or partnership application must include names of principal officers or partners)

4. Developer Address Same As Above
City/St/Zip

5. Description of Bonds (including Bond Number, Tract Map/Application number, Lot number, and description of improvements covered):

Bond #82295462-M
Street, Storm Drain & Sewer Improvements (Locals) Maintenance Bond File # (Sundance) Tract 31468-7

6. CERTIFICATION OF ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS: I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the information in this application and all attached answers and exhibits are true, comyleie an orrect.

Rick Rush
Print Name and Sign — Contact/Applicant
08/27/2020
Date

7. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, costs (including without limitation costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with contractor's performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations for which this Bond exoneration is requested, except for such loss mage which cauM d . , he active negligence of the City.

Rick Rush
Print Name and Sign — Contact/Applicant
08/27/2020
Date

8. Developer/Contractor has completed all the following items prior to requesting release or has included them in the application.
• Remove and replace concrete and AC as needed where lifting. • Provide AC crack fill as needed. Crack fill/seal shall be hot asphaltic emulsion. • Provide Type II slurry coat for all road surfaces.
• Restore/Verify pavement striping/markings.
• Restore/Verify blue dots and signage as needed.
• Clean and camera sewer. Provide report and video copy of camera survey. • Provide all final geotechnical reports.
• Provide Engineers' certification for line and grade within Right -of -Way. • Provide Landscape Architects Certification as required.

Rick Rush 08/27/2020
Print Name and Sign — Contact/Applicant Date

BEAUMONT
Punch List
Project Name: Street, Sewer and Storm Drain Improvement PW2020-0540
Inspected By: Jason Craghead
Item
No.
1 3
4 5
6 7
Description
Street Sign at Yarrow Ln. and Acanthus Ln.
needs replacement.

All Streets need Crack Seal, Thermoplastic
Striping Removal and Type II Slurry
applied.

All Driveways (122) not in accordance with
Riverside County Std. No. 207
Re -apply Thermoplastic Striping no less
than one week after Type II Slurry applied
S/W corner of Veronica Ct./Acanthus,
Curb Ramp not in compliance with
Riverside County Std. No. 403 Case A
Streetlights that are not working are
identified with Duct Tape "X" on front of
Light Pole
[COMPANY NAME]
Bond No. 82296452-M
Page: 1 of 1
Completed by
Construction
(Sign/Date)
Tract No. 31468-7
Date: 10/26/23, Updated
on 8/8/24
Accepted by
(Sign/Date)

MAINTENANCE BOND
BOND NO. 822 i6452 -M
PREMIUM 3Included in Cost of Performance Bond.

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

That , Pardee Homes,
as Principal and Federal Insurance Company . a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Indiana and authorized to transact business in the State of California (hereinafter called "Surety"), as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Beaumont,
as Obligee, hereinafter called Obligee, in the amount of One Hundred Fifty Nine Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety Three and 27/100 Dollars ($159.893.27), for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

Whereas, the above bounden Principal has entered into a certain written contract with the above named Obligee, providing for construction of certain subdivision improvements in Sundance PA 22. Sewer, Streets/Drainage, Pardee Job # 70499005, #31468-7 in the City of Beaumont, State of California; and WHEREAS, said work has been or will be completed by Principal.

NOW, THEREFORE, if said Principal shall promptly replace and repair any work proven to be defective because of faulty workmanship and/or material within a period of one (1) year from date of acceptance of the work by the Obligee, then this obligation to be void; Otherwise to remain in full force and effect.

Signed, Sealed and Dated this 24th day of May, 2018.

Pardee Homes
(Principal)
Federal Insurance Com
(S
(Seal)
(Seal)
anina Monroe, Attorney -in -Fact

ALL- PURPOSE

CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California }
County of Orange
on MAY 2 4 2018 before me,
}
Michelle Haase, Notary Public
{Here insert name and tige o1 fie once)
personally appeared Janina Monroe
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose name(*) is/am subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that km/she/toy executed the same in kis/her/their authorized capacityge and that by idsihernbeik signature(*} on the instrument the persona, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(e) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY -OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Note Public Signature
(Notary Public Seal)

MICHELLE HAASE
Notary Public - California
Orange County Z
Commission # 2161127
Comm. Ex Tres Au 22.2020

ADDITIONAL OPTIONAL INFORMATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS FORM

DESCRIPTION OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT
13(51/LA 8-2'19(0 LS2—M
(Title or escriptice of attached document)
bf- 15e a. ONVIT-51A*
(Title or {ion of attached document continued)
Number of Pages Document Date 51241 l

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY THE SIGNER
❑ Individual (s)
❑ Corporate Officer
(Title)
❑ Partner(s)
6a Attomey-in-Fact
❑ Trustee(s)
❑ Other
2015 Version voiw.Nolary('i&Ssea con 80(1.1:7:::-9855
This form complies with carent California statutes regarding notary wording and if needed, should be completed and attached to the doctmrent. Acknolaedgems from other stares may be completed for documents being sent to that state so long as the wording does not require the California notary to violate California noire)? law. • State and County information must be the State and County where the document signer(s) personally appeared before the notary public for acknowledgment. • Date of notarization must be the date that the signer(s) personally appeared which must also be the same date the acknowledgment is completed. • The notary public must print his or her name as it appears within his or her commission followed by a comma and then your title (notary public). • Print the name(s) of document signer(s) who personally appear at the time of notarization.
• Indicate the comet singular or plural forms by crossing off incorrect forms (i.e. lte/shddltey is lave ) or circling the correct fonns. Failure to correctly indicate this information may lead to rejection of document recording. • The notary seal impression must be clear and photographically reproducible.

Impression must not cover text or lines. If seal impression smudges, re -seal if a sufficient area permits, otherwise complete a different acknowledgment fbnn. • Signature of the notary public must match the signature on file with the office of the county clerk.
8 Additional information is not required but could help to ensure this acknowledgment is not misused or attached to a different document, Sr Indicate title or type of attached document, number of pages and date.

O Indicate the capacity claimed by the signer. If the claimed capacity is a corporate officer. indicate the title (i.e. CEO, CFO, Secretary). • Securely attach this document to the signed document with a staple.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.

State of California
County of Riverside
On May 30, 2018 before me, Sonal Shah, Notary Public
(insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared Michael Taylor
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature letialAZA
(Seal)
lih SONAL SHAH p
•
\ NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA y
COMMISSION # 2216371 EE
vrt, j' RIVERSIDE COUNTY
� , M ,C m_m. Ex:. September 30, 2021

Chubb
Surety
POWER Federal Insurance Company Attn: Surety Department OF Vigilant Insurance Company 15 Mountain View Road
ATTORNEY Pacific indemnity Company Warren, NJ 07059
Know All by These Presents, That FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation, VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation, do each hereby constitute and appoint Paul Boucher, Michelle Haase, Dennis Langer, Thomas G. McCall, Janina Monroe and Timothy Noonan of Los Angeles, California
each as their true and lawful Attorney- in- Fact to execute under such designation In their names and to affix their corporate seals to and deliver for and on their behalf as surety thereon or otherwise, bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof (other than bail bands) given or executed in the course of business, and any instruments amending or altering the same, and consents to the modification or alteration of any instrument referred to in said bonds or obligations.

In Witness Whereof, said FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPAiJ, VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY have each executed and attested these presents and affixed their corporate seals on this 28 day of July, 2014.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY
SS.

County of Somerset
On this 28th day of July, 2014 before me, a Notary Public of New Jersey, personally carne David J. Edwards, to me known to be Assistant Secretary of FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY, the companies which executed the foregoing Power of Attorney, and the said David J. Edwards, being by me duly swom, did depose and say that she is Assistant Secretary of FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY and knows the corporate seals thereof, that the seals affixed i0 the foregoing Power of Attorney are such corporate seals and were thereto affixed by authority of the By- Laws of said Companies; and that she signed said Power of Attorney as Assistant Secretary of said Companies by like authority; and that she is acquainted with David B. Norris, Jr., and knows him to be Vice President of said Companies; and that the signature of David B. Norris, Jr., subscribed to said Power of Attorney is in the genuine handwriting of David B. Norris, Jr., and was thereto subscribed by authority of sold By- Laws and in deponents presence.

Notarial Seal '
KATHERINE J. ADELAAR

NOTARY PUBLIC OF NEW JERSEY
No, 2316665
Commission Ezplres July 16,2019

CERTIFICATION
Extract from the By- Laws of FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY:

All powers of attorney for and on behalf of the Company may and shall be executed in the name and on behalf of Inc Company, either by the Chairman or the President or a Vice President or an Assistant Vice President, jointly with the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary, under their respective designations. The signature of such officers may be engraved, printed or lithographed. The signature of each of the following officers: Chairman, President. any Vice President, any Assistant Vice President. any Secretary, any Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Assistant Secretaries or Attorneys- in- Fact for purposes only of executing and attesting bands and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such power of attomey or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shah be valid and binding upon the Company with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached.' I. David J. Edwards, Assistant Secretary of FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY (the "Companies') do hereby certify that
(i) the foregoing extract of the By- Laws of the Companies is true and correct, (ii) the Companies are duly licensed and authorized to transact surety business in all 50 of the United States of America and the District of Columbia and are authorized by the U.S. Treasury Department further, Federal and Vigilant are licensed in the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Federal is licensed in American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and each of the Provinces of Canada except Prince Edward island; and (iii) the foregoing Power of Attorney is true, correct and in full force and effect Given under my hand and seals of said Companies at Warren, NJ this May 24, 2018 David J. Edwards, Assistant Secretary
IN THE EVENT YOU WISH TO NOTIFY US OF A CLAIM. VERIFY THE AUTHENTICITY OF THIS BOND OR NOTIFY US OF ANY OTHER MATTER. PLEASE CONTACT US AT ADDRESS LISTED ABOVE. OR BY Telrpnone(908:903-3493 Fax i909)_9¢3.3856 .-mall: surerymdnlbb.tom Form 1510- 022513- U GEN CONSENT (rev. 02.14)

h:\PDA1A\20I00606\CAOD\LANON .v'IMPROA\STREET do SD\666S77G1.DWG DSWWLSON a/7J07 2:02 pm aterryPaNey

VINELAND
FMV1S+dD SARFACE__ FS
GRADE BREAK G8

MOH POINT HP
7GP OF CURS- IC
ST
Beaumont
ST I
INTERSTATE 10

VICINITY MAP
Ins
LEGEND
NATURAL GROUND. ..... VG

PORTLAND CEMENT GON GREREPCC
ASPHALT carom AC

CONCRETE
DRIb£WAY

WATER METER

TELEPHONE BOX
WATER YALLE.

VAULT
DO NC
DWr
LOW POINT LP ,..... KId
PROPERTY LINE. .i CIE
RIGHT OF WAY "..Rim ...-_.� 1W
CURB FACE CF Kr
EDGE OF PAVEMENT... EP POSER PCLE_.___....... ..._......PP MOWED GRADE FG AGGREGATE BASE-...- ........... .AII
LOCAL OEPRESSION_...._LD TANGENT T
ENSTTNG ELEVATION 100.50 , (70050)
r7NRRNED ELEVATION +10[.50

PROPERTY LINE
CENB*INE
RUGNr-Or-wAY (R/11)
EXIST. WATERLINE
ccosr. BLOCK WALL
FIST_ CAS LANE
EXIT. ELECTRICAL UNE (EDISON)

EASEMENT LIVE
.454044
WILSON ST.

RAMSEY ST
MBA W-21'
Oen 14.139
CONSTRUCTION contractor agrees that In accordance with generally occeptedCOns 23.07 1F5 construction practices, construction contractor will be rewired to assume sole and complete reopensbtlty for job site conditions during the course of construction of the project. Inducting safely of of persons cad property, that this requirement shall be made to catty mnlinuously and not be limited to normal working hours, and construction contractor further aggress to defend. indemnify and Nall design professional harmless from any and at Rabtit$ red or alleged In cormectian with the performance of work on this project. excepting liability arising from the sale negligence of design professional.

UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES & USES: The engineer preparing these plans er0 not be responsible for, or noble for, unautha rred =angers to or uses of these pions.

Al changes to the plane must be In writing dr must be approved by the preporer of these Wens.

MC W=21'
1710 6.35 CFS
(IDs• 9.63 65
LEEIARAIION CF ENCREER OF RECCE*
THEREBY. DEaARE TEAT MV THY PROFE5SNCNAL amok RE woo OF THE

IMPROVEMENTS AS SHORN ON THESE PLANS COWLES MYTH THE CURRENT PRCFESSOY,IL ENGNEn8WG STANDARDS AND PRACTICE'S AS THE EN,YNEER IV RESPONSIBLE CHARGE CF PR -DESIGN CF THESE RfPA01EL EHTS !ACCEPT FULL REEPONSIBIUTY Fat SUCH DENIM I UNDERSTAND AND M30HONTEDGE THAT THE PLNJ *ECK CF REM PLANS BY THE CITY OF BEAUMONT lS A REVIEW FOR THE

LOOTED PURPOSE CF EMSIRING THAT DIEM PLANS COMPLY RUH WY PROCEDURES AND OiNER APPUCAB&E OWES AND OROWAAICES THE PLAN RENEW PROCESS IS NOT A DETERMINATION OF DIE TECHNICAL ADEQUACY OF THE DESIGN OF THE ASPROICA EN7S SUCH PLAN CHECK DOES NOT THEREFORE REUEIe i ICE OF MY DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY.

AS THE ENG'NEIR OF RECORD, I AGREE TO DEFEND AND 64DEMAWFf THE a7Y O° BFAUMON; ITS OFFICERS I1S AGMS AND ITS EMPLOYEES FROM ANY AND AU. UABRAY. CUIMS DAMAGES. OR MAWS " ANY PERSON OR PROPERTY -A iG-FROM NEOYIGENT ACTS ERRORS OR O655COVS OF THE ee:. OF RECORD, HIS EMPLOYEES. HIS AGENTS OR MS CONSULTANTS SIGNCATURE r gm& ropsfrmicrl
LICENSE w TIGGT EXP. ralstla7
RCONTAINED NYr N THESE PLANS

SNAIL NOT COMVENCE UNTIL AN
ENCROACHMENT ps/NoT AND/OR A
GRACING PEPaRT RAS SEEN ISSUES,
Trff FRAOIE Doris's WNW RIESE RAW S
RESREWSO4f FOR As'SL'IB1rJ pK APC7lR.1Cr.ARD
AACEP7ABC7r eF 114 CYSY'R AALON AY he
INst OF OSCRO4WOES AR5'.1a 4 7ER CITY
~mu IN caws court C'.umC he
MATE OM= NINe 6t RESPCSISSE 1 -OR
DETERMAWG AN ACT.'EPUBE SCUROWAAe
RECtoac Siff PHAVS POtomato BY ENE cm:

PAD
20'.SETBAOI

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
Street Improvement Plans
TRACT 31468-7

TULIP CIR N
Park
TYP1C .87RffTSEC1(ON
N
25'
25'
LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF SEC 2, T 3 S, R 1 W, SBM
IN THE CRY OF BEAUMONT, CAIJFORNIA.

R/Y
20' WRACK
I
SI$
t0'
7B'
Ile
PAD
1 TC-a.40.02' I .0 S+kr+'T12
'S a_. 31�
did
6` CURB & GUTTER
H Y T.0 _ H 4'AC OVER 8' CLASS 2 AB
YAXLOWLAIR•VBERMNMNLOWCOU T
9EIXI AWWY•ORCRSIWE`JONaX LANE
HEATH LAME. ACa1NTHWAITAEW®RONICACOIRT
TI.c 5.5

INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET

DESCRIPTION
I
TITLE SHEET. VICINITY MAP
2-8

STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS
9 STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLANS

SHEET NUMBER
(r/PICALI--
AAA
•Im ono ur

TRACT BOUNDARY DRIVE
TRACTT sr 47, 1-
r

INDEX MAP
SCALE I`= 100'
1 SCALE: i"' 100'

DIAL TOLL FREE
11800).227-2600
xURM6r YAWN' Dm
M2i Ya D1e
Ie01116Nas0 s6EIKGA101TOP Kama& ciaronos

BASIS OF BEARING&
=wow
BASTE OW 17E LINE WHEW STATURE
'TRAM- M0 %ITN'- (POSiT:Ca PER
NATIONAL CEOCL7IC SUM', MINDS.

EPOCH 1956.5) AS SOWN LW 11.8. 102,
PAM 50 7?RNEI 65 F RECCIEDS IN
COMTY REcar[ER's trruQE or
RIVERSIDE LGINTY. GALTFa6414
BEING: N 52'49'02.84" E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUMONT
tampon* ND. 07.A.82
1-3/6' BRASS DP AORAEWT MARKED
'CITY B.M. 7'. LOCATED At TIE S.E.
ma T4TH AID NOBlE4.VANES AVE..
59 FT. S'LY AID 22 F7. Etter
L PJTERLIte INTERSECTION, 2 FT. S'Lr or
or B.C.R.

ELEV... 2678.277 (1982)
or NARY
OC7AxP1Ke
Dtta41 BR

REVISIONS
1L RN
laGg3T 4 mom
>Art CAIFog
P1 t
PIED 1. Pace

DRAINAGE FLOW
W=14'
CM. 6.34 CFS
171»' 1 .66 CFS
CB�L Wm14'
CM= 6.84 cps
QNo• 10.68 OfS
I
I
I
r
J8'

DIRECTION (TYP)
SS'

GENERAL NOTE&

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEARING OF THE PROPOSED WORK AREA AND RELOCATION COSTS OF ALL COSTING UTUTES. PERI.ITIEE MUST INFORM WY OF ITS CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION, AT (951) 709-8520.

2. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, 'LATEST EDITION,' COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 461 AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS.

3. ALL UNDERGROUND FACUTIES, WITH LATERALS. SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO PAVING ME STREET SECTION NCLUDINC, BUT NOT LOOTED TO, THE FOLLOIMNS SEVER. WATER, ELEC3RID GAS. AND STORM DRAIN.

4. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR OR DEVELOPER TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL CONSTRUCTION. REGULATORY. GUIDE AND WARNING SIGNS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS AND ITS SURROUNDINGS.

TO PROVIDE SAFE PASSAGE FOR THE TRAVELING PUBLIC AND WORKERS UNTIL THE FINAL COMPLETION AND

ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE CITY,

5. ANY PRIVATE DRAINAGE FACAITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY. BY SIGNING THESE IMPROVEMENT PLANS. NO REVIEW OR APPROVAL CF THESE PRIVATE FACIUTIES ARE IMPLIED OR INTENDED BY CITY OF BEAUMONT PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.

6. IT SHAH BE THE RESPONSBIUTY OF THE DEVELOPER/OWNER OR CONTRACTOR TO APPLY TO THE CITY Cf BEAUMONT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, PERMIT SECTION. FOR AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR ALL WORK PERFORMED WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED FOR PUBUC USE; AI.D TO BE

RESPONSIBLE FOR SATISFACTORY COMPUANCE FCR ALL CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS DURING THE UFE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR THIS PROJECT. ADDITIONAL STUDIES AND/OR PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED.

7. THE DEVELOPER YELL INSTALL STREET NAME SIGNS CONFORMING TO RCTD STANDARD NO. SIB.

8. ALL STREET SECTIONS ARE TENTATIVE. ADDITIONAL SOIL TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AFTER ROUGH GRADING TO DETERMINE THE EXACT STREET SECTION REQUIREMENTS. USE RCRD STANDARD N0. 401 IF EXPANSIVE SOIL ARE NCOUNTERED.

9. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER TO INSTALL STREET CENTERUNE MONUMENTS AS REQUIRED BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 461.

10. ASPHALTIC EMULSION (FOG SEAL) SHALL BE APPLIED NOT LESS THAN FOURTEEN DAYS FOLLOWING PLAC*NENT OF THE ASPHALT SURFACING. FOG SEAL AND PAINT BINDER SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF

0.05 AND 0.03 GALLON PER SQUARE YARD RESPECTIVELY. ASPHALTIC EMULSION SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 37, 39 AND 94 OF ME STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.

11. AS DETERMINED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ME DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE AS A MINIMUM FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO CENTERUNE, AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO RECONSTRUCT EXISTING PAVEMENT.

INCLUDING BASE. AND MATCHING OVERLAY REQUIRED TO MEET THE STRUCTURAL STANDARDS FOR THE CURRENT ASSIGNED TRAFFIC INDEX.

12. CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS DISTURBING MORE THAN ONE ACRE MUST OBTAIN A NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPOES) PERMIT. OWNERS/DEVELOPERS ARE REQUIRED TO FILE A NOTICE OF

INTENT (NOD) PATH THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD (SMRCB), PREPARE A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPP) AND MOHITCRINQ PLAN FOR THE SITE.

13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL SIGNS AND MARKINGS NOTINCLUDEDIN THE SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN WHIN TARE PROJECT AREAS. OR ON ROADWAYS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES, UPON THE REQUEST OF THE °RECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CR HIS DESIGNEE TO IMPROVE TRAFFIC SAFETY ON THE ROADS UNDER THE JURISDICTION Of THE DEVELOPER.

14. EXSTNG STORM DRAIN PIPES / CULVERTS (WHETHER TO BE CONNECTED TO, EXTENDED, ADJUSTED.

DRAINED TO. OR JUST IN THE -PROJECT VICINITY) MUST BE REPAIRED, AND /0G. CLEANED TO. MAKE THEM FUNCTIONAL AND ACCEPTABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.

15. ALL STORM DRAIN, CATCH BASINS AND STORM WATER RUNOFF STRICTURES WILL BE PROW/ED MATH ADEQUATE CAPABILITIES TO FILTER AND RETAIN SEDIMENT AND GRIT. OIL AD CREASE TO PREVENT

POLLUTION IN STORM WATER RUNOFF IN COMPUANCE WITH THE CITY OF BEAUMONT'S BEST MANAGEMENT

PRACTICES AND THE BEAUMONT DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN FOR STORM WATER AS WELL AS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT REPORT or WASTE DISCHARGE FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY PERMITTEIS.

Is. DEVELOPER SHAD. BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE IN ASSURING MAT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CONFORM TO THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATO9S AND CITY OF BEAUMONT STANDARDS. WHERE DEVIATIONS EXIST, DEVELOPER SHALL PROPOSE CORRECTIVE MEASURES FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 17 THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REWIRE REVISION OF THE APPROVED PLANS TO ONFONM TO CURRENT

STANDARDS AND TO POST A NEW BOND IF CONSTRUCTION HAS NOT COMMENCED ITHIN TWO YEARS AFTER PLANS WERE APPROVED.

IS. TRENCHING FOR UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES IS NOT ALLOYED UNTIL SOIL COMPACTION REPORT IS SUBMITTED 0 AND APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.

19. SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAY APPROACHES WILL BE POURED/CONSTRUCTED ONLY AFTER DRIVEWAY LOCATION ARE DETERMINED.
15'
27'

38. 15'
1' T
31'
25'
IN. II
PL

DESIGN FS
[IPROVBENIS 9 Q.

LAN EDAPE TAT IX.IEDUN UR.

NUN. 5' AIDE ii" 6'SEAINC
CO GE
TO.0..5.36'
T60. O
COPAC1W DIRT FILL CTRS
BrelaUM

NOT T IE
STA. '19+14.00 TO. 59+04.02
19'
KIN.

V

10.7'
r
LIIH er
CI
stag SLING
5'AC DER 10'IY.II A9
T.C.= 7.5

CONSTRUCTION NOTES & QUANTITY ESTIMATES
NO.

DESCRIPTION
UNIT
QTY.
10 RaNSTR,ICT 4'AC LIEN IS' CLASS II. NTGREGA1E BASE.

SF
167,444
r.A
CONSTRUCT 8' FRE A-8. RIVERSIDE SRI.. NI 200. E ! � COUNTY CF LF

0.458
3 OONS•DTUCT CROSS GLIDER Is SPANDREL, PER CNNRY OF
ROUSE( SID. NO XS R 2091:

EA
13,:

O
RIVERSIDE SN (401(HYOD FIFIED )' PER COURT tf
SF
48,680
vt.v RAC
OORSiRUCT CURB RAC A. PER 031ARY IF
CASE RIVERSIDE SID. 03. 403.

EA
10 STLLlDT GUTTER DEPRESSION FOR CNN WqWpEQN�DR caw BASK DONFM COUNTY CF RIVERSIDE SID. ND. 311 CCM B).

EA
3 f 7
I Q
metier 61JIZE$ rerscsSTGI fOR DIE Mama CATCH BASIN,
PER COMITY GF RLVFASIOE STD. NO. 311 (CA`E C).

EA
2 O
I A8LL STREET ME SIGN PER COMM OF RIIEIESICE STD.

EA
9 o
INSTALL SIREEP LIGHT PER 83,1GTE STRFEE LIGHT PLANS.

EA
11 CONSTRICT 42' RCP (0•LOAD PER PROFILE):

LF
127
�Oil
acoma=
SOY RCP (D'LOAD PER PROFILE).

LF
200
COW= 18' RCP (0-.010 PR PROFILE).

LF
131
®
�R57R1CT CATCH BASIN N0. 1 PER Mk RD
SID. DIG. ND. 08100 (6 k Y Pet am).

EA
5 ®
OCNSTWIDT Ti Al MEN SiWIOTIfE NO. 3.

PER RCFC A TED SID. DIG. ID. TS303.`.

EA
1 ®
CONSTRUCT MAN N0. 1 PER SCFC
IYE a STD. 010. 03. IIt02 T.

EA
1 COISTRUCT a e• C&DIETE suer macaw
SF
1,644
MJINNINS ■ DOS,0N • co Nelmuarlom
74710 CORITRS CUR ORNE GLRTE 201
PAW DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92280.1866
760444.741 • FAX 76024USIe • ...ABPswn
OMB - 05667
ROE W. 5%67 oP, 12.71 -IT
OESI
CAR
DRAM an
ORR C
0400En BY:

ACS
SOLID
I•. 40'

PLOT DATE
03/07/2007
JIB 20100666
Amassed Byr
Ax r{gmovtl BsrAmman
HEMS
so E. 40. Amy
(as1/9- 9 •
.86x1
m 657 Ar(%r o8eMid
slowing Amwoo

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA

EST IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 31468-7
TITLE SHEET • warm Y MAP
GENERAL. NOTES
LWW$ 11111611 VI 8'Sf02, tAR R I.. £e,
!R LE 4117 CF sorx39rt. t¢RRMRA.
rac
Pardee Homes
SHEET
1 OR_e_ SHEETS
ORPIINB IIME.
4645T701.
rr� ��

AMORA 11/9/06 8:25 um
�PDATA\20100666\CADD\LAND\DLv\IMPROVE\STREET & SD\668ST702.OW0

10. 11,
2665-CUR9LRT
S
10 11
tin a,
YARROW LN.faymR BRf
as I t i e g .
.1'e so'R
za.21.6tEca! •iy
TC 2569.16
FH8t13.66
*w
21403.2 90R i4r '
91 TC268852 ,;• 4
b III Elsa
•
YAi;ROW ti h
LM.Zrgd
WIC
wow CONTA,NEO VERMIN THEW PLANS

SMALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A

GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUER
nE REEVE &N OVEER s(.06 now PRAYS' ,S
=ROOM TOR ASSION40 INT ACCSNROY AAA
ACCEPIABA/IYCF Be OEM 7KROH N NE
DENT AY OCCREAWOES AR3IAC MISS BIT
AMARAL.OR OYK9NC CM5LRLNTRYE JNE
P91515 WAVER SAS1 Sr RESPOARB1E.AVA
OOFNNNNM. AN ACOVIAEE =Tai AR7
RE%SR1 NE FINIS FBI . WNEDD BY VR an:
a
a
a0`Pcori ait6)
8R
H• Loos
".a9.eR
69 I

13. AOANTIIIUS LANE
TRACT 31468-7
VERONICA CT.
?CI
�`'1yA1 4.28 ' �6
87 " II%TC1+8HLIIJE'' I tg 4'11
78 BCt 11+94.15 8W SHEET £06 11494,26
71 72
In

DATA TABLE - CONTINUED
i DELTA/SAG
RADIUS
LENGTH

TANGENT

RELIPRK
FUO•y'2 CS•

68.91 OA k p7TYE7k
12 _ y qqt(yy 4.11:66
0O0p
1 qq5�

51. ......
' -
13 A1.1.Q� 418 25'
7 DO'
a1'
4 46
14 A• 1` '40-
.06'
.74'
'

0.05' 07lia
dm got 'or

25.00'
8s.
18 hoe tz t
y LZIrI-TR
17 tr 'Sly
407.00'
56:39'
2d3T'
16 4a'1)
-

50.00'
-,
..
119
tp "39�

40. W
I , .5�73'
-
y331
21 a 06611'6
705.013
1••.72'

54.95'
tr
832.00
CS.CQ"
..
24e
Is
31 -
N40
-
-
OP4O k 91rrER

BASIS OF BEARING&
BASED ON TIE LIFE BERM STATI01S
-7RNr AAD 76117' (FOSITI9G PER
M TM MI. ETIOLET1C MKT. INIOBJ,
EPECH 1995.5) AS SUM ON M.B. 102.

PARES 50 DROWN 65 OF RECORDS IN

WUJTY RECEIVER'S OFFICE OF

RINIRSILE CCONIY, CALIFORNIA
BONG: N 52'49'02.84" E
BENCHMARK: CITY OF BEAUNCN'T
OISERPRON Eq. 07.A.82
T -.T/6' 5045$.ce AOuerr wren
T11Y e.g. 7•. LOCAPED AT AE S.E.

COMER 14111 AIL) PSWISYLYANIA
SIFT. slr AAO 22 FT. E$Y OF
CDJTDUIE 1NIERSTiL7191 2 FT. S'LY or
OF B.C.R.

ELEV.. 2878.277 (1982)
EdG
;$g77
• t3
-80.60 -
73 15.
74 0C F
.17F•; 720.1 (9 curs)
..._VP1.9878.37-- -m
9r1.2A $.-V1.sOX.

R 475
57 56
DATA
TABLE
0 1E1.XA/�G
R40
i�
TA14GE7dT
r«
Nv5 37.,47:
!L£
NO1"15 9
-
91'
-
tr 06 4@09
SS0-0:1,

10.42. �'p '9
••
4 a 11'
750 CO
1 .15

53.67'
¢3
H004 '4x2 E
, -
29 .9a
r.

NI 37'10-T

r�
4 13 22 OB'
587-46'
110-52'
5#-53'
116
BY
SARI
D605 95

OESCA PTWN

REVISIONS
APPR DApa
*TY
2670.-GUMB LT
DimizciLL_-
2670 6
CURB RT-- --2678-'CURB RI
+n
ID
59 TO
G
.4AINNNNO It O[/IYN • OON•T•YOTION
• 111 7a%C COUNRJS CLUB ORM2. SUITE 201
PAEM 0 SER7.QAE?OISSA 02200.10E6
CONSULTING 70G34474S1 • RAN 71303468315 • wawRBFsae
OANE, t11041tOG
ICE NO. 17657 05. 2-31-01
G3
ORR
OWN 67:

LRR-OC
01426010 SE
165
SOV.i-
49'

PLOT OAIC
11/09/2006
dtB N10R
20100666
coot

60.118..
9116491,8.1
98:419$-S
06 -CENTERLINE FS;
TC ♦ RIGHT
12 267

CURB-LT-
2B707-OL
2674 -CURB RT

POINSETTIA WAY
TIGER FLOWER Dth
tr 84
rfi,
d`I i. .
�'S3
� IIGEl l �i
11'x,
Il i i'1
II ; !i
TT
II � li
;{ I I{
fi t i 1 it l I) gmq Kq
TIGER FLOWER DR.

SEE TRACT 31468-5 (MAJORS)

STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS
Roamed ON
�o x
Approved *
CRy of BQShAYAOng
Erroineorho Division
�laoNL 15.4[7
I
°°R YARROW LNI1
J 11 1!
19 A
18+19.96 SER
TC. 2670.06
FL 2669.56
88 YARROW LN.
50' a
IS' I 18'
7R0r11 E q'iO As
NNW 1'i 4O'
SERI: 1' • 4'
Q CONS1RUCT 4.1C OVER /MUSS 11 AEWEGATE BASE.
2 COtS117Ct 1YPE A-6 ass 6 BUTTER. PER COWRY
CF RIVERSIDE STD. NO. 2W.

COSTRUCT CROSSo . PER CONN CF
RE $79. NO. 09
SW RIVERSIDEE SM rm.(nD401 1Fl j PER 01141Y
L DIM ROW, CEE A. PER DIRTY OF
® 5711LT RIVERSIDE STD. NO. 403.
© COIGIR ET ERI1 DEPRESSION TRIO. CUM 311 196161 s)CA701 BAS1N, PER © PhDROLL D816.STREET NNE S124 Pat COI141Y OF RIVERSIDE STD. d INSTALL STREET L124T PER SEPARATE SLEET LRBHT PLANS.
23 TRACT 31458-7
21 .'
40 0 40 60 120
1 77RAPHIC SCALE
"CITY-OF-BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
GAY X4.10 -►7
530 E. 6111 S/R}7
S:AM NT. C4 9272.1
ni(90N)AS4S520 • FAA1461)50.SSN

BTREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS
'TRACT SN88-7

ACANTHUS LANE

POINSETTIA WAY
694164010 OMB • 6174 NM TO 11,12 6
LIMITED IN REIN VA IF EEC Y. T J S. RIO. 6W-
- IN 9E D71 E ffAISYR'. 0591IFDA. -

SHEET '
2 OF 9 SIEETS
Porde* Homes.

TPA111O NNE
666ST702.dp
FILE

ID
LAND \01VUMPROVE1
.4
10 11
12 13
14 1554
15 ie1
17 18
19 20
83' ID
PI 0 11408.00
EL 2672.26. -: .

04.129,8'40.5
4 - 0:5135
PI 0 1 400.£0
B 7672.26
641.16211'44).5m

EDELWEISS D
-
II li
ll 11
11 II
fl �
II II
II II ?`,' .�s. �,
I II i l!' 10 a69;95
1s 1 .11 16. 171' Zliq .- 8
g i 50` 1
EDELWEISS DR ge
.I P
i4Ya4K CONTAINED WITHIN THESE MANS
SHALL NOr COMMEND war, AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/CH A

CHASM PERMIT HAS BEEN /S AIL
TAE PRAA1E SWIM WAS Mfg :GANG
RL2POL6SLE 484 ASS AM N.TAC5*ICY4N9
ACCENANNY OP RR OE5GN 4048€, N Pe
8545 Cr =WAN= Nemo MEB 4Yh
Anwokat CR DWG cDr5TaLertcH BE
55168E 1TCNE48 Fall BE RESPONSILE ION
=War AN ACCEPTABLE 45440N ANO
REY36O RE FANS FOR AMMO) BY WE CBS
15`12.00
080. `
a 'YAWOW .LANE
TRACT 31468-7
a I 10
155
----4S Gra:.
9 ORCIHIS LN
132

1.68 9412
TRACT 31468-7
R8
DATA
TABLE
.
oTILT
BRG
RAMIS
LENGTH

TANGENT
1811.4NRK
WV' i8-=
141.48'
Cp11ER1.115
2 .6... . .4._%3 2 4 '300.00'
]74.47'
420.!_
14 54 425
-

84.50 ..
4 NSA • p I
6 --
R0 Nr
,,,,
..
do 05 56'
1000.00'

55.�1100}'

47.59'
_-
65 1�55�.4§•
1 H020 3 Vii

-
••
dn1¢1P13�
500.OD_

86.5 '

6.557
CENTERS_ IFE
y ,`
5x.9900
6Q Tie'
E4L
elf
}g �!
-

47.45'
-
I
21 d1. 45 t
"514'
218g ppQ�

29. 22
AP 3848

28.OES'

36. P3

0.47P RE!103
23 M 14.1
.00

3.5.48'
144'
-L11TO
24 Y1 id.
31L5.00`�
288.45-41
I .01
k j7riiR
-IS1.6
H)
- 9�266

3.61'
20 67 06'37'

74.00'
22 . 24
..
21 75.4 Y
-

46.41'
--
zl
Co. ,k5"
962.00'

93.34•

46.73'
--
24 PS 27' 16'6
-
125.53'
r -
-CI-R0 it DIETER
30 12
29 13

DIAL TOLL FREE
8OM 227-2600
Pe Wit tie Mats Dori
Weis Yes 1:41
4111 W 6RoiAn f CAFE NNW OF aamRFw 54)5114

BASIS OF BEARING&
BASED 1214 DE LIRE 6ETI5L1 STATIMS
-TRAIL AND )875 (AOSITIOVS PM
IWIIN& GEODETIC RACY. 14420.

EAODTI 1995.5) AS 9DIM4 O4 54.9. 102.

PAGES 50 DA5Ai4 65 CF MOWS IN
4114!5 RECORDER'S OFFICE OF
RIIERS/SE 441411. CALIFORNIA
8E4NG: N 52'49'02.84' E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUMONT
DESCRE a0M N0. 07.A.82
Jti/8' EAAS5 CAP 10041147 WANED
�CIIY S.Y. 7'. LOWED AT T7£ S.E.
4Y61E1 NTH AM. F0A611.VANIA
59 .FT. stymy 2$ FT. E LY OF
LEi42 S,IAE IMET6ECTLQ49, 2 FT. Sty r --
0F B.C.R.

ELEV.- 2678.277 (1982)
28 27
1410.

BT
484
0006+101
APPR.
€846458

REVISIONS
'26

CONSULTING
air"r a"
.95
P1+2672:01 -
16 O.
39221
4+9.82
PZ4670.26
•

TC RIGHT

YARROW LANE
TRACT 31468-7
>:1
18 r 19
48 COI 11429.00
TC 2670.18
FL 2 .66

DATA TABLE- CONTINUED
O
00-1-14726
RAplli$
LE3K TW
TAWGE7NT
Rf34Af8(
4L49'.3 4� 11
141.48'
CIAhB S (tlfiF,H
4 42

8. x'46.16'
.a
j12
..
1 R
--
AO
-- -
44 o- 52. 18
.00

65.26 1.
45 15'36' 101
-
466.06'
-
-- :•••.
f�]
ad4� 5,456 `
1 5.

87.56"

43. •-
_
'%
.�'
«.1}'
g.
4a0�501'00'
CURS k GUTTER
.,MANM,NO • 'OCf,•M • 'CON•L,.UCTICN
05 74.110 CONROORY CUM DRIVE EOIAIE 201
PALM DESERT, CALtPO+145 95540•'456
'49t • FAX 769816&45 • wwRRFmo
OATS Id De I be, -
Rc4 53- SKE7 08. 12-S-08
tE:5E04 8W
Gat
CORM TIT:

MAC
GED=
IBS
SCALE:
1•. 4o'

PLAT GAIL
11/09/2006
A2�
01W666
CBy o/ Beavrwl2 Rhea Wa7Aa
Embeerikig DIAtion
AA746iR1-
11+-9.00 MAT£ L
a ^ ^E SWEE Y}
:R1„ ,...._7_7,.17..1,8.1,5.,1!,i 8
e b' 1• Y by i
POINSETTIA WY.
pRIFILE SCALE
TERM 1'- 40'
VEHI: 1' - 4'
2875 CU1ia,S�
'coma 9 11_2675-€1.
rf
SX. E. 541 37854
EAL4CRT..4 9222.1
45193, j>i2-&500. 4441N44)244. Asa
-2675-' age R r

CONSTRUCTSON NOTES
Q 4f61RICT 4'AC OVER 8'0.F55 11 AG ATE ELME.

O Cr 11544TIIWEBEeE AA- ea. 2.

PER 0550T
PER 031511Y 44'
O RIVERSIDE CORSTRICT � 29 � k
OONSTRICT SI 618Th PER FURL PER 451415
W Cr RIVERSIDE STD. W. 401(0130 j.

CONSTRUCT CIS RAP. CASE A. PER COURT OF
O RIVERSIDE STD. NO. 403.

O PER COIM5 COMMOCT OF RIVERSIDE STD. NO. 311 ONE DEPRS1604 maim SEMIS BASIN.

O 6.4. MEET NM 5181 PER 451415 Cr RDERSI4C SID.814.

O INSTALL SHEET 11045 PER SEPARATE S1 I Lion' PLANS.
i €11
mR
m
672 11418.00
TC 2670.11
F1. 2669.81
20 88
gd
40 40 60 1
03441110 5644.£

BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA

STREET IMPROVEMENT FLANS
TRACT31468.7
YARROW LANe'
4184 00200 101114010
LAU1ID iN REN 04 OF SEC2. 1St*tr. SSE MAIINO M4C
-71E w
TN VENT LILRABRr" GRBR/M:" SST' dwa
SHEET
3 OF..9IEETS
Pardee Homes -'

/9/06 0:27 em
i
PCR. 50.'..9
PI��gC
E1 4"2876:43

00.919.0.411.90
pa

IOFMIGY
;•POINT
2076 CL
-207:5 -e,
82 Wig
8ORK CONYNNEO N1eM'N YNESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNIX AN
ENCROAcIMENr PEWIT' AND/OR A
GRADING PERMIT HAS SEEN Iiq¢R
SE PRIAM PIPOI t $IG1®.d NM PLANS K
2250' LREF0l AMMO R4- ACC41A4CY AND
ACCEP03CAY C7' fl 316118 /E:RiCM Pi fiK
117197 CF OISCREAWC6S 400010 AFDF CRY
APPAORLL CR 00140 CONSD91014YC 7NT
MOW 20206ER Vita HE 20 P :ME 120
CE70 00200 AN A4CEPL1906 SWAM A0
2200C 04 P1100 ,0R /1002020 SY AIE an:
83 81
10`
266
21 22
23 a
CENTERLINE Fs
50• 3287' '---POROF'80VC `'EG
CC- , -,;ac. .. - .:.-PI-®-11460:00-
a- _2024.02'
.� -a-100.5.0'231X.

TV
11 +t 2675 CL
;
;-2873-C
V ER ONICA4 O '--
TRACT 31468-7
it
R
ACANTHUS LN.
50' .
121 ~
78 7
BCR 13423.97
1C 2674.74

93.51 'FL 2674•
'12.39.16 MR
10 2673.06
88 T FL 2672.50 "e'
87 ,+
16�: 16•.17€.
11 1-7 71
72 7,
t1 I ]i ll 70
11 1 R11 2
ige 11 w !i
ACANTHUS LN.

T.

I
13-41-T- 21570 - CURB RiF
DIcAwr

DIAL TOLL FREE
18000 227-2800
As Lear Duo kteNN Oro
0■91■16110SIMIN/DO IOIMOO CPUONt
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

DESdRS0 0,9
BASED ON 11E LIRE &TFEEN STATIOVS
'SEW MO •1)77)7' (POSITIONS FEE
ANTW4IJ. EMETIC EMT, 144083,
EPOCH 1995.5) AS 91YAN ON Y.B. 102,
PAGES 50 11010100 65 OF RECORDS IN
cower RECLFIYS ?TILE OF

RIVERSIDE COMM G IFORNIA
BEING: N 52'49'02.84" E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUAONT
OE5C DDOAt N0. 07.A.82
1-3/17'' a7ASS CIP mum 1422610.

CITY 8.N. r. LOCATED AT IPE S.E.

COPPER 1411E AAD FE7AS3LYANIA AYE
59 FT. SLY AN 22 FT. E'LY OF
IEN7E]F.1AE INTERSECTION. 2 FT. SIT
OF B.C.R.

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982)
or
MARK
Fb10CiiER
DE000011ON

REVISIONS
alb
- an
APPIL
4,
w
R
206
MR 10442.

DT'L
C 2669.
-4

YARROW LANE
TRACT 31468-7
ACANTHUS-:LN,

50. :7-• ia�" a,.a
fig{ 1110+4136'
Fj TcNLINE`'
Re f SitEET
Y
468
E7R 10.41.30
w
062.12'
4019.03 • SR
PI647.04`-,

3.a.I -$-8 S,
.... POR:0F:80'VC...

PVT STA-r-10.60-
I'VI f3EY.r $08.72
9• -0.799:0•-1.1)77
cietTIV
t06.47' T3
CC
3 Id
07 apN
94 EC
PGR.GF 90=-VCL.

PI 41 10.50.00
O.* 2666:90

6.-0.5 .8- =1.240
rgg•
2679 --CURB rRT
96 2696.74
10+29.15903 t LO
.74
0 14�.V 0'
2830 -CL
pRorlLE scALe
100Ib 1". 40'
5 T. 1•-4'

CONBTFILICTION NOTES
10 0007ISZT VAC OVER 6. CLASS 1I. AG;AEGATE BASE.

C0 T
® RI ST0 FE -6. 0.82 k GUTTER. PM COREY OF
3 CC STRUCT CROSS GUTTER k 00J0 0., PER WIMP 1X'
0 RIVERSIDE SID. NO. 209 k 206A.
0 RICO s N (MIS PER FLAW). PER COUNTY OF
Q RHOS= 5110. CC61511004 0.193 10 4033. AM A. PER twoOF Q CFPER COLVIN coptmcr ARIVE I ISE s10D. 0 0. 311 FCR InCCAt) lal BASIN. ©' w 0116 STREET NNE SIOI F9R cony 95 RA ester SID.
0 INSTMI. STREET LIGHT PER SEPARATE STREET L1040 RAHS.

DATA TABLE

Q DELTA EIRG
RADIUS
LENGTH

TANGENT
1 ARK
111q.
-
149.x9'
4NF�INt
fkf86Y9� s �r
-
i0 Eil ]]E ©9TH
9iCIME-310
1 ilii01
1 LMLnrIFlEIkEli=11
9111h
ike, '.110
i1E

TFFFFFFFFFR
210ML :31t1M'LICAII i11A
WA

11.71 M!!!: TlFe3EEE=.
' ]ER•S
liM
AF=1EEF1C'lii
`.:If. ME'.11.`_7ti T:.:1E 224:•1
JENIi
&UMEN:Y+
Mi:IFt
9 0111E»iE�
3i>t::.:

F. )1
N6. � aElu.91•.03.--FifEilMil
s NI
40 ORAMt10 SCALE

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
Dai&'8111-fLI

14.0119
DAIR•-4°
Fri
550 E. 67N =tar
2047007. -04 92227 FGfi•
101(951)789.6600 •,4N(A11)201.2051
STREET 0WR0WMBNT PLANS
TRACT 814B9.7

VERONICA COURT
YeRaW
BTAiOIa► a TOM=
£CDIR'D RI BE 1■ 1/4 V SSC f, T it, tut, S41
IN DE 0.117 6 2007 ,. 20J0054.

SHEET
4 OF 9 SHEETS
rnrD6 N
66661704.dp
TRL 74
P00d60 Names

N
0 `t
N
N
0 8
7,5
-
-279-CURB-FIT
10 93
9-6
2X•CONYAUNEO 1WIiNN THESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNRL AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A
ORAOJNC PERM HAS BEEN ISSUED.

OS PAa1Tf EAGLVG 1 SCAM MESE PRAMS N
RLSPA19BIE FAR AL'LREG fil'E AEIZA4C/ AAA
ACC(PH f4i Y or IMF OEM Fg5024 554
SEW OF t» AWN AMR o1Y
APPROWL OR MHO 00MSDttlCnAR H11F
ANON =VEER SHALL BE Rf5FON6a4E 1PR
DEfVAINMS AN ACL{PCt54 SIWTAM -_
ALUM (AL HAYS 1014 APPp015 df NE Lin

DRILL TOLL FREE
1[800) 227-2600
At Loot 1W S11Y02�+1 GIP!
Bilon,tfo OatOof IOW* MAR BP Ia4nfRlC LIOIU
- '•- PLROF 80 VC
PLLID!GO.C2._
R. 'EL : 2666,60.
3-0.50%.0.-1.=
- " 3 '
67 (c
11 98
65 12- 13
59 99
64 DATA TABLE
d

DELTA/ECG
RADIUS
LENGTH

TANGENT
REMARK
I
N15'Ir9'07'{F
-

04.1 --
- IHE
7 a 124 114.40
750.00'
7 104.49'
05 38'B
4 B
-

40.055
-
Ck71TElNLLNR
5 d '

12.00 69.7$'

40.95'
c80,6.2
10 413 O4 V F
-
-34.13
-
[ t
11 o -GOD 1
?58
732..60'
1335-13'

96.0 06 0
-
_

1.1 A- 25'27'

34.30'

45.74'

25.77'
LUSH RE"TLFb1

BASIS OF BEARING&
DESD9PTD*
BASED 0V DE LIRE BEIREE'N STATISM
•0215 AM 1NI1K (POSITIONS ABP
HIUOAB. DECOETIC Slo1EY. N1083,
EPOCH 1995.5) AS SHOW CN M.8. 102.

PACES 50 T1ROUGH, 85 (1f 3ECOMIS IN
CdLMT AMMER'S OFFICE Cr
RIVERSIDE cowry. CALTF0514
BEING: N 52'49'02.84" E
14'•

HEATH LANE
8 683
62 61
TRACT 81468-7
101
192
15 6150--
103

DATA TABLE - CONTINUED
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
TAN1ENT
fitMARK
-
4p yy��
-
MATS i 6•rrrER
1 1:11:941161?J4 �7
103.34'

19.44'

6.73 1.11
-
-
dP11 5�
768,00'
711.
,10' , .9n
1,'5,7.7`-
-
31 1120 VI y4,o
"1
SS
A. 10 23 19'
107,00'
-44'
••
3S
N1o'i9 A2'F1
-

40.91,
-..
..
37 OP 97 I3 05 53-40'
RAW
DO -14'
CuR6 I GUTTER
BENCHMARK: CITY OF BEAUMONT
DESCRt RIM NO. 07.A.82
1-N8• RPA.SS GIP MWIENT WAILED
CITY B.Y. 7'. LOCATED AT DE S.C.

O:RER 14TH .410 P177456TLVMBA AVE..

SOFT. SIN AID 22 FT. MTV,
GENIERLDE INIFRSY:CTIOV. 2 FT. SIX OFD
CV B.C.R.

ELEV... 2678.277 (1982)
sr
us/apnea

REVISIONS
80 41
-r.
106
16'.

IOILG T'+�
6274"--

84.00m4q p p
! ..
28463.16 E0
GRB"1L' 108
105 106
g SIR
IMFPMpNINf It -OLAION f -6Og1TRY6TION
■r B. ■•

CONSULTING
AP"...:"P a
aIr g
74400 501R4T411 CLUB DINE BUM 2O
PALM ME RI CALIKPOPAR21891115
750441.7481 • FM 760311/315 • WINNlpso n
54 AV beilD�i
RCE 143.571M 0A. 2N31'07
.71
16481.86 HEATH LP4.

04.tl6ESOtIIA BY.

INTMECTICN
107
OES10
DRAIN BY;
,DC
mom 45
ASS
SC/LE

1.40 PLOT DATE
It/09/2005
.123 /Oak
20100665
28*6 URB -7
City of BB@UfNI7E
Englneeft Olvteke
--SURD: R7
�R.

PRDF'ILE SCALe
NW& l'- 40'
VERB 1' - 4'

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1Q CENSTISCT 4'A6 OVER 8' CLASS II. AEPRE1?A1E BATE.

O OFCONSRIOCT 6' TYPE A-6. CUMt RITTER. PER 0 M1Y
Y RIVE1610E STD. to. 200.

O as SIODI A III1 H EER RA). � YRIV OF
COISIRUCT CMS RAP. CASE A. PER CO RY OF
® RIVERSIDE STD. IO. 405.
[067!1137 carrot Cf]'IifSSIUN FOR cum 02841113 CAT84 BASIN.

PER SONY OF RIVERSIDE 510.. NO. 311 (CASE C).
norm.STREET NAE S151 PE)t MUM Or RIVERSIDE SID.
® lA. SIN.
® 116TAU. STREET LI9R PFR SEPARATE SSW LICHT PLAI6.

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA

STREET IMPROVEMENT KARS
TRACT.8146S.1-
EA
STAG 0100 TO Biel
LOO1R77 Mi5B 8V4 liSC2, TAAR 1-A 51R
IN At CITY QrBEALY217, MOI AA.
0 SHEET
511a0C III[
Lag

20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
122
20100:00 i 6ORRA RAY
I10444.36 01041
I Be
IVORK GYNTANEO A77NIN MSC PLANS
SHALL NoT COMMENCE LWRL AN

ENCROACMMENT PERMIT AND,DI A
IADB+C PERMIT HAS SEEN :55.1154.

BB Myr EA1L7 AN SCAM REX PINS .S
^ALS tE TOR A47.NAY lbE ACOAAILYAND
ACSEPFAYSRY CF SE GUM IE SN If Mt
SEW CF ElSCREPARCES AR76MC N IR aRr
44/54/151 OR 6AP03? CCNSRP4CSGL SE
P41475 AWNS S UL BE ROZPOISSZE FOR
0(f(RR:14M AR ACCEP7t&( SEW1-0N ,440
RaNmAC ARE 01455 FOR APPAOIEB Br PLCOX
123 00
TC 2882.47
15492.36 LC
MOON
FS 48
124
121
1�A9ATCHLJ, ,
SEE eiNEE
1_41:41.8249.!.

ORCHIS LN.

I� U
120
PCR.1F 130' YC
P!'■ 23+34.00 IL • 7686.27
60:91[:;8'?
JONQUIL LN.
119 §5110
E.9'_
40 i narr
:10+43.-1743 • gg

0.43.133 o. 117
R0 TCkLG,& 9� ge Ile
€sidEET1S; 10+43. EIR
47 DATA
TABLE
DELTAI9R?
RADIUS
LI7dGTH

TANGENT
�Ia<
1F£
C)
+4.30'
Ei 4 8'3P T
224.80"
Aya71tt1 1 j'
2161.00'
13 727.86'-

.04
_"_
4hQ�.� 4 SzV�
4, .443
-
c�IrI� 1PE
N
1 M ¢0 d4'O+r

52.06'
Ei.716'
S2.CS
6� T.&TNE

BEGONIA WAY
50 TRACT 31468-7
51 Ma� :4t . i:7
411:11!
Jill IEZINI I.T:�:�
llIEMIIEW- AIK-WASIMIDYEYASISN•X!1-X
r isImP.1
i51
tt TaEcY: 11E11
tii8=i
11MIII1:•iRMINIMMimall
1910EEINI f1i1i71i1i1i1Wf1•
fartWM11FA�i17IVA!eL
illittfi
f L:iMIISS=1MIM.N;liftilQii1i1i1Wfti
;•:T�.ILY.'si
fitM
iti N ]RE
rini1F ,EMI
SEr.191,11 WaHriinlititilif__
1111/SIMISIEWMIINFICKili
ILUEMa lt1:if
ELINEOfk3E114fkrEQAMEIC
IENI B
lii_
aICGIWRli_iii*
IIIM2 ., F=SLJr :7it!IIDUI2 2-1T.PT5i1II=
0 e

DIGALERT
OPAL TOLL Fib
1(800). 227-2800
At UM The %Vita Cole
Mem
04e1BI LIOsargeAS@R4R4E8O■NONIPOISM

BASS OF BEARING&
BESCRPROlt
BASED al RE LIRE BEDEW STATIR6
TRAK' MO %Mr (A051TILNS PER
SWIM. VENETIC S1RIEY, P44993.

ETGUI 1995_.0AS 956TH 8V Y.9. 102,
PAGES 50 7I BO4 85 OF 9802,09IN
COUIar REC RDS'S CrFICE OF
RIVERSIDE 84CMY. CALJFUOf1A
BEING: N 52'49'02.84" E
BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUMONT ,.

CL5:87P111CYLL• NO. 07.A.82'
1-3/8" ERGS CAP ACME? NAMED
'CITY 8.Y. 7'. LOCATED AT RE S.E.

GLRIER 14111419 FEN.ILVANIA AVE,
59 FT. S'LY AN122 FT. Ell' OF
67V:MLitt INIERSECTI(N, 2 FT. VD' 0r
OF B.C.R.

ELEV.. 2678.277 (1982)
NARK
6ESCMPI
OPAR. OA
10445454

REVISI NS
arr
a
115 4' 114

IRAINABE FUN
DIIECTIOV TrP
-arm' B
52 113
-59 55----
112
•--4x.55
110
57 53
55 DATA TABLE - CONTINUED
S310
DELT fBR6"
RADIUS
LENGTH

TANGENT
PWAARK
M 69 09

34.00 34.00'
CURB t BiTTE.R
15533.8411:
141
2199.00'
458.64'
229 2d.
..
-N76 33.04"+4
-
150.04'
-

0.501 t BV77ER
U
109
te
Si858
m
g
-3885-CUR
-26B5CUR8-R
107
4,
106
105
pBffILE 15
NORM t 40'
1 15 1• - 4•

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
( COMA= 4 AC VIER 8' CUSS II. AS6IEGATE BASE.
® ROOS=COISITIO? gSg TPD A -e__, 50.5 SUTTER. PER COUNTY OF 0nag SID PO.(�01I� YOPPSIEDI.)• PER COEl1Y cc
® RIB TT CUS STD. ROE 048E 4. PER COUNTY CF

3. ® It6TAU. SHEET NNE SIGN PER WMTY OF RIVEASIOE S1D.NO.818. ®:.INSTIL. STREET LI347 PER SPACE SI T U41T RIB.
40 40 ac t

GRAPHIC SCALE
, RLANNINO ■ OCOION • aSNOTRUCTIC

II II II PALM
MAIM CLUB DRAM SAE 201
PALM 001110, CAUFORN IA ♦I2 1456
CONSULTING 750340.7481 • FAX 7808/88815 • wavRBFACIC
f 805
R:u11EL & BUTTON
CAFE 4t10410r
REP 57167 1W 1-801
on! @4 BC
CPR
ORM Be:

CFR VC
0E015 05
165
sum
r- 40'
PLOT 0140
11/09/2006
AM
201
Pbrksed Bye
for Approter
Bg
ADmardEM
MSarrN • 0R5amr !44505
CITY OF BEAUMONT. CALIFORNIA
City of Maumer4
Engl eerte O1dabn
5611 E. 41N AREL7
HEOCNT. C4 92221
75(8511768-t17.1P • ratDst]9T.Rua

SWEET IMPROVINENT PLANS
TRACT 31488.7

BEGONIA WAY
40105060 TO 344$
EOC11i R17 NC IR V48F 652. 73S. R_t P.691
Rr TIE env rr moon DI*4344A:
410
Pardee Hann
SHEET
6 Or_e_9 wT5
000011110

a
a
Co
0 10
11 12
19 14
15 15
YAif I
RROW L.N.
1fl 11 11 I I it
11 NOR
WORK CONTAINED VADiAN MESE PLANS
SHALL NOT •CCAAMENLE UNTIL AN
ENCROACHMENT FERN!, AND/OR A
GRADING PERAef HAS BEEN /55UEA.

INS MINIS EA [A SOW NESS PUNT S
REVONSIBLE 7CR ASSU2W. 118 ACCA71AC7,AN0
A[CFPTAOUN OF NH COMM hISPfdAt NNE
AWLS Of 35d/EANCIES MOM ATTER 0/5
APAIYAW7. OR IMAM COVSIROCNO14 INC
PM/FE swam 5MM 71E RNSPONSBIS VCR
0/15M A/AS A4 ACQEMMA' SLwrm LAN
ROWS PIC N4AS SCR APPROVED AS N$' 0/Y.
132
30 TRACT 31468-7
0413144
1c
31 ,2160.53 OD]IIS LAZE
•10100.00 VOETTNI WLELU CT.

FS 2676.01 ¢ INT.
130
T.1
FL 2875.50
32 128
-1200
Mi0r : • .00 IC 2675.35
ATCNLIA(E I " PL 43 .00
qa 3EE SHE& 9 ,893
1110,0
0TB' 16' IIT.I ♦_'gi
I
VENETIAN MALLOW CT.
,125
125
IO
45 4
123
122
120 `t
121
DATA
TABLE
IN
7y
fi.!11:lkf..ss ij
Ff£]IAAK
Ii)r
>F
a= OMMrrlaaaxirsu
-i
RIB
W:IFIXESKIRDMONINIEllESIIMIMIaaaaa
iiMal
T(1rWI,
Fit+ EIrMaaaal
■liFAMa33330��
IIM
M771FaliEMAiNiMUMSaaaaCat_
Ell
a[•]t;iklia-
-Ot:
1IIits AEA.
sit f:1.1TIfli:-Si
WTI
a!1M=IP
aC:?•1C•T1fmmail[erlaILI:WARMA:W
JT•'7■■aii
]E=WANaaT
aaaaaaWi i
aISWIT
F1►E31A40l s
aa',rT faaaaaaT�a%r:3
L !iaaal
i=1
all
MC3iE3TIF
T■aa
aMUM.

IL
wiz
E Li:Yz7CPI[liMall=aliViLlia■■aa®■iliMITra■ar
a?l
ial
laaE;
1FIASi:it
al
all ]E9m®aaaaC7al_ .laaaaaL7
-as
cure I I.17f7ER
awl
is
332 00
INE,FO-1 01aaaaaY�
EM5Ta ilinfivaaaaC><a1,1:116"1laaaaa0Cr7ir ina.

RREF7LE SCALE
HERTZ 1•• 40'
NERD 1••4'
0 maw 4.00 0. Y e• OA95 IT, OMB= BASE.

IRIIC5 6' TYPE A L 9.FB 8 SUTTER, PER OWEN 0E
® CQSRT►ERSU SID. ND. 200.

ORISIRLOT 0 RL SID. ICI. 8 DMA.

PER o91Amr ¢
O RC sSII AIRDDIIYEESIEE SID. NT. PEFLMAL PER COWRY Cr
O 01LSIRUCT CURB REP. CASE A. PER WIRY OF
5 RI1¢ISRE STD. N0. 403.

INSTALL STREET NNE S10N PER COUNTY O7 RIVERSIDE STD.
® N0. 616.
90 INSTALL s1REET LI9TT PER SEPARATE STREET U9R PLANS.
a A+a 7
9RA.ANTCSCALE
DIRT

MAL TOLL FREE
1i8OO) 227-2600
IIL R pD4a
Boht11260101JO IUREU At■R 0I WOINONaVIR0
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

EASED ON NE 1.1AE NTAEOE STAT10N6
"WAR- AN7 '1WRP (PC61T10A6 ffF
*71000. EMETIC S HIES. NIOIB3,
SPOOR 1995.5) AS 9,10414 a N.B. 102.

RASES 50 DIEM 65 OF RECORDS IN

COURT ROWER S OFFICE OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY. CALIFTRYIA
BEING: N 52 49'02.84 E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEALAAEPIT
=WAX NO. 07.A.82
13/8' MASS CAP 1ENAENT IRMO
CITY B.N. 7•. LOCATED AT RE S.E.

CTI ER 14TH NV EEISSYLVANIA AVE.
59 FT. strop 22 FT. ETV CF
CF TERLIAE INTERSECTION. 2 FT. 5YY e
O' 8.C.R.

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982)
SY
r
POMO

OESCRPIVPA

REVISIONS
APPR. 0A7�..

Orr r
.•LANNINO ■ 0LaMON ■ cam aT*EUOTI0N
11 11 74150 001345117 CLUB OWE, SUM 201
PAUA DESERT. CALIPoRNEA 92260.1655
CONSULTING 7BO5A6.7Aa1 • Mx 76057!83 5 • wmRBEmn
CAIE: IAC.11144
Raga tail Eta. 12-71.6.7

DESIGN BO
1241(
MAfe'. B0
08000 EN
N55
1 1'• 40'

PLOT DATE
17/092036
as RIM
20100665
&Mewed Bye
for AppIRwamTsrldt
APPoved
Wake
My of Bestmorg
Waft Department 556 E. 6M WET

ECALMY SUM
111(9511,651-119V • i) vA.0112E
CITY OF BEAUMONT. CALIFORNIA

STREET IMPROVEMENT MAW
TRACT 31{08.7

ORCHIS LANE
8TH 10100 TO sans
Mire VINE* tI41rSEC 2. 73 1( R 7 V. SAM
T6 NE CITY WISFJAKIff, CALIFOIRA.

SHEET
OF_t_SHEEIS
I mow see
6A61ST707. dig
Pardee Roams
FILE

n
L'
53 O\LA
12 13
144.:
10°
0 2880; GN
2680 GL - , 8
-2684 CURB- R
10 TC' RIGHT
11 VENETIAN MALLOW COURT
B8
!I (1CHIS LIt 811
'� II l it 2875.88

13.28.53 FOR 43
10408.00 YEIETI YA11C11
-12585.53 CROSS LN.. I t '\ A 8150'
FS 2678.04 Q INT. N1utr
i$ w
129
130
7 r; 18• f 18 �;7;,
1,„t
ORCHIS LN.

NOM
WORK CONFAB:ED WHIN MESE PLANS
SHALL NO2 COMMENCE NNJR, AN
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AN0/CR A
GRADING POLO' HAS BEEN ISS'ED.
1W PYLOIT OMER WOO THEE HAAS'S
RESROM281E UDR 559Ai$A1 RE ACCWLICT AHD
SCCG?5441F, OF ME O 50 H77SCM w 18
MB OF Dr0RFRa5E5 MASAO AFTER A!1.'

OHM OR RAW CORSIMAIRK
A918A1E MOM SOLVE A RESPOM 26..0 fag
507FRte001Tr AV ACCEANME 5085100 885
REMO ME RAMS fat A9F500 Br 705E Gen
8738
12042.5,3 EGR
1C 2575.43
FL 2674.93
32 11
TRACT 31468-1
g42 41
10 54 Our;
Ss87.
33 DATA TABLE
9 DELTAOBRG
362■
1458 7x6
RADIUS
300.00'
LENGTH
16i.k

TANGENT

82.77 REMARK
combust

CEMEFLDE
wag 4 2680. CURB LT 26 GF
38 37
36 DATA

TABLE - CONTINUED
0 DELTA/Ma
RALIuS
LEWGIT

TANGENT
ROodat
10 ■
-

41.3[5
-•
Clue 6.5111851
11 6n 4 4 41
319.00 •
145 5
18'
12 m. 13 41''851.

T[17,00'

25.55'

12.65'
u Qi 21S 12 03'

49.00'

10.4 -
..
1� rw} Ot7' '■
-

43.6v-`
-
-.
1 0. 4 4`;1 2
107.
48, 1'
yy4�
--
_
19 M 2ii 4T 7

30.130' 116.93'

56.3'2'
••
15 NM 27 16 ■ _
_ -

87.30'
-
WV ::

DIAL TOLL FREE
1(800) 227-2600
ATL. DM
Baalac Cla
11•410quiCOMM /Ma Ai 04048[86 RUFNut
BA818 OF SEARING&
O SCRIP .

BASED CAI 11€ LIFE SEMEN STATIOF6
"we ANT 5N114 (PCSITIOVS PER
ANTIGEN. EECCETIC 1RYEY, N1283.

EP001 1995.5) AS SON ON B.B. 102,
PASS 50 7010160 65 OE OEMS IN
024112 ISCO ER S OFFICE OF
RIEERSICE 000012. CAL !FORM
BEING: N 52.49'02.84' E
BENCHMARK CITY OF "BEALIXINT
DSLBM2i NO. 07.A.82
1-3/8' ORASS CAP WHAM 50150
CITY B.B. 7'. 10017ED AT 1W S.E.

CONS 14701 AAD IEP8YLYANIA Al!..
59 FT. S'LY AND 22 FT. E'LY CF
CEiNT36.1AE INTERSECTION, 2 FT. SLY Cr
Cr B.C.R.

ELEV.. 2678.277 (1982)
6T
8186[
0551501:

DA
5005016

REVISIONS
071

11.05.63 13 2888.97` -
CENTERLINE` F
PoR.oF sor._vc .1 -
yg.4 19461.at air-I.111ea01.00 +
•
. EL"- 2668.95 . ;
POt.OP 50' -VC- .,- $8.126 .'_
9 �. �: m
2 .99 . gs
r 94.74%

JONQUIL LANE

OAK VALLEY PARKWAY
BEGONIA WY..;>318
48 i1 19 ge 117 81'N
TC 2685.56
10+90.00 .awn
.22498.05 BIIBONIA
FS 2685.79. 1 INTO
50 lV..~
;`2885.94
TC .74
FL 2885.24
45! I16
BEGONIA WY.-
2690 -CURB -41T
2680 -CL
268B -CU RB-RT
A, I!
5E 112• I 38' H 1 38' 0112
II 106' 1
r=�

OAK VALLEY PARKWAY

DATA TABLET- CONTINUED
35 24 76 ►'23' ''
PLANNING ■ 0Ca160 ■ COMM YCTICN
■... ■. 111:. 74-DO005772 owe.6 GLIM D SUM 3101
PAW DESERT, CALF0VMUS1000de66
CONSULTING 740.346-7481 • FAX 705046863 • ww44iFmm
A'i;191
381E
816E 819 1 D4', 12.041
RADIUS
OE5I91 BT:-+-
a4E
17ULN 05'
IRR.00
0EOE0 BY:
165
SCALE
I -4O• -

PLOT DOD -
11(09{2004
48 220/00666
LENSiti

65.45 85.25'

TANGENT
City of Bs Las i*l • • Works
Bigheerho Digskto
550 E. 81H SWEET
5414MV, CA 42223
1G(A510t2414420 . Fu895 %262.6526
morn r Sly 1P
11811'1' 1'- 40'
W M: t•-4'

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
0 COtSTROCT 4'AC OVER Cr CLASS II. AGGREGATE BASE•
Q 00151S T TtPE /r8. SID. RO CUTS bPPIO.�tJNT1 , PER COSMY CF O RICE SID AO.(4o D iFB)D). D. PER cou17T Cr
0 INSTAL ow LIGHT PER STEATC =ET uCNT PLANS.
6644.4614641114

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
STREET 818ROVISE14T PLANS
TRACT 81468.7

VENETIAN MALOW COUI T

JONQUIL LANE
601:1.0070 5669 8 510 TO 11.0606
13319112111,3fE*6.4 OF4Ti A. T38. R1I SS1
IN DE CTI1501.2821.- 04.IFMRA.

SHEET E E T
8 OF 9. SHEETS
FCR
Pardee

01.943
i4G
(5937770(6 .1..1

9 3
O
V1u1{EB;73 FPS 56.

BOX
80RK CONTM'NEO WHIN MESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A
GRADVNO PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

TIE' I4PAATf L7l9 $1G'Mm1C. Me RAW IS
Rl1POASaE 107 ASNURv0 DIE AOCI,RICYAMYr
'A.%YPf161RY LT De (685^ f IArm0. 6 116
076*? Of 0617856161' 160M ARFR MY
*PROWL A4 MAC LWM/AtC86 171E
PANNIC micro SOW RE ItSFOT866 iC9
#785666 AN AWARE =MN AND
WNW NNE PUNS fO9 Ammo 8Y ME CM,

DIAL TOLL FREE
1(800) 227-2800
mum Tio 4Otte
Yam CA)
UNIANIOJC"MCC ALMIN' IMAM cmM81

STORM DRAIN DATA TABLE
0 6EMIU6/DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH

TANGENT
NOTE
20 48'26'15'

45.00'

38.04 20.'14"
42'STOp1 BRAIN
21 N 74'51'0^5' I
--'

88.56 --
42'STCWI DRAIN
22 23
N 60'03'47" 9
--

3.18'
--
-
N 81'43'00' E
--

61.82'
--
30"STCR11 DRAIN
24 25
N 77'00'39' 11
--
119.95"
--
30'STDRI DRAIN
- 29'4258'

90.00 46.67'

23.87'
30'510921 DRAIN
26 27
N 39750'0-0" N
--

56.97`
--
1S'STDRM DRAIN
N. 15'31 25' R
-

6.88'
--
-
28 N 40'00'00' E
--

55.61'
--
18'ST66 DRAIN
29 N 01'55'42'.E
--

37.26'
--

18.518911 DRAIN
BASIS. OF BEARING&

DESCAE'IM

RAM EN TIE LIRE BERM STATIONS
"TOW NO '6916' (P06171046 PER
16770 60. GEODETIC 68864. N1083.

EMIR( 1995.2) AS 901IN CPI Y.B. 102,
PACES 50 111 01E155 C REMO IN
CORNY =OMCER S O''4ICE OF
RIi9ENSILE COMITY. GLIFORNIA
BEING: N 52'49'02.84" E
LINE 7
18' RCP SD
BENCHMARK: CITY {1F BEAUMONT
DESLRIPIS3E NO. 07.A.82
t-3/6" BRASS CAP AVOW 4L416C0
C1TY 8.U. 7'. LOCATED AT TIE S.E.

COVER 1416 NO FEN'SN.YANU
,59 FT. S'LY AND 22 F7. E'LY OF
CET EIO.IN: 1NTEREECTIDN, 2 FT. S'LY
OF 8.C.R.

ELEV... 2878.277 (1982)
4N0•1102
LINE 7 - YARROW LN

REVISIONS
TRACT 31468-7
EL 67
2670.0
LIN = 7
30- RCP Sn
INE 7B
26700. r
TRACT 31468-7
2660.5
■ ■ ■
CONSTJLT3 ND
HEATH LN.

LINE 7A
18' RCP SD
97 2669.3
2669.1
93 C
2869.2
PLANNING 9 OGSION N CONSrSCC?ION
74130 OOIN4IRY 15.18 DAM SURE 201
PAIN 0E6ERT, .:ALWORNIA 62200.848
160.348.7481 • FAX 7804418416 •- Mw88Fn1n
OATS tidal 10-,
96 - o
2669.0 A3
LINE 7
42 RCP SO
95 2669.0
VO .* 0DIN
BUD IM 00.4
x#50��UN
6*y.

NOM BY:
-VAC
WS
09ECAEO Ent
08 17

6.07 CATE
07 ELs2661:92"- -
10400.00 80 LITE 7-TARIM LN
NTH. LILJN KR -STARLIGHT
Mc I MI 8.0.4
FQ 2667.0
CC.( ' ION STRICTURE)
NIT 10.4 PR SEPARATE P1M6
(ME Y.N SD PLANS)
01 LIPP SUM DRAIN
PER SERRATE PLANS) 5D IMES)
Cit
JAIS y ty of Beaumont AdakWodcA ROE N0. VW OR 72-3117 20100664 Eng/ix:aft Division 870 E. 1r.+ Mg/
L. 5272j
T7t(457169fS2* • V 9I..EA-AS6
RF Rem F
HafUZ 1'' 40'
KO 1' - 4'

CONSTRUCTION NOTEQ
4 l CONSTRICT 42" ROP (04.0AD fiat swat).
1� wow W Tara (D•LOAD PER PROFILE).
® CONSTRUCT 16' RCP (D -LOAD PET TOWILE).
® 4 7A. CB100 (1T131 REIN 5 VIPER P161). RCM k:CO
CONSTRUCT 106615ION =UMW NO. 3,
® PER RCFC S E0) STD. DO. TO. 15303.
=STRUM NOME RCM0. 1. PER R.
® 5 RD STD. DOG. N0. 1(651.
® CONSIR CI 8" CO MTE 6.1671 DCASBE]IT

GRAPHIC SCALE
CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALrFORNIA
STORM DRAW IMPROVEMENT PUM16
TRACT 9N88.7
LINE 7 - YARROW LANE
am 8800m TO14Al2
LOWED IN TIE NOW 99:2, 736, 14 111. SN
1N AE CITY CF 8586T; CA
Pardee Homes
SHEET
8512130 NNE:
66153709_

Cherry Valley
N

VINELAND ST
INTERSTATE 10
Beaumont
LEGEND

DUTTON ST

VICINITY MAP
NTS

BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BCVNO

FINISHED SURFACE FS NATURAL GROUND NG
GRADE BREAK GB PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE...PCC

HIGH POINT HP ASPHALT CONCRETE AC

TOP OF CURB TC CONCRETE CONC

FLOWLINE FL DRIVEWAY DWY
LOW POINT LP WATER METER WA4
PROPERTY LINE JP. TELEPHONE 80X GTE

RIGHT OF WAY R/W WATER VALVE WV

CURB FACE CF VAULT VLT

EDGE OF PAVEMENT EP POWER POLE PP

FINISHED GRADE FG AGGREGATE BASE AB

LOCAL DEPRESSION LO TANGENT T
EXISTING ELEVATION 100.50 , (100.50)
FINISHED ELEVATION +101.50

PROPERTY LINE

CENTERLINE
RICHT-OF-WAY (R/W) - - __
EXIST. WATER LINE - --- ---- ---W--- --- --- ---
EXIST. BLOCK WALL
EXIST. GAS LINE -- C. --C.---- C-- ----
EXIST. ELECTRICAL LINE (EDISON) - - -- -0-- - - -

EASEMENT LINE - - - - -- - - -

DETAIL 'D'
NTS

EXISTING
16" DIP

THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL
NOT BE RESPONSIBLE 006/0+ LIABLE FOR

UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE
PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE

IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE
PREPARER OF THESE PLANS.

DETAIL 'A'
NTS
THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SIGN1NG THESE PLANS 15

RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THE ACCURACY AND
ACCEPTABILITY OF THE 0E51GN HEREON. IN THE
EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES AR151NG AFTER COUNTY

APPROVAL OR CURING CONSTRUCTION, THE

PRIVATE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

FOR DETERMINING AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AND

REVISINO THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY THE
COUNTY.

Banning
= WILSON ST.

RAMSEY 5T

SANITARY SEWER SS

BEGIN OF CURVE BC
ENO 01 CURVE EC

FLANGED FLG

INVERT INV

TYPICAL TIP

TOP OF PIPE TOP

BOTTOM OF PIPE BOP

NOT TO SCALE NTS
0760 HYDRANT F71

MECHANICAL JOINT MJ

STATION STA

STORM DRAIN SD

TEE III
VALVE
WATER SERVICE ®_

FIRE HYDRANT (IYET BARREL)
FIRE HYDRANT (BY OTHERS) p04
AIR AND VACUUM RELEASE .-
BLOW OFF -•
- 0
DRAIN
NOTE:

ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON
ARE TRUNCATED. ADD 2000' TO

THE ELEVATIONS TO OBTAIN THE

ACTUAL ELEVATIONS
NOTE;

WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A
GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

NOTE

SEE SEPARATE PLANS FOR

SEWER & STORM DRAIN
SYSTEMS.

FIRE H

SIDEWALK

PROPERTY LINE

BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Water Improvement Plans
TRACT 31468-7
2850 Zone
44)
)RACY 31468-
LOCATED WITHIN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, T 3 S, R 1 W, SBM f � \
\
der,« \
4 ilite
fit;
Mar: NUMBER
ite; 4 li . AI" b."
FN PER SEPA'.....,-----. P• lim
to :,-
1 4tliw
Ina p:121
VO11 � '�'., li
l's
' Iii ®� +i'��
.: 14117:- '' lij=I
4' e1 nr =
Nog e riNts 2 II Irk III il t i
OM.. CmVE il
9 •.1 --- -�/

INDEX OF SHEETS
DES9RIPT10N
1 TITLE STET
2 YARROW LANE - STA. 10+54.00 TO STA. 17+00.00
3 YARROW LANE - STA. 17400.00 TO STA. 22+86.52
POINSETTIA WAY - STA. 15+72.75 TO STA. 16+70.75
4 FEATH LANE - STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 164-72.96
5 ORP115 LANE - STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 16+51.15
6 BEGONIA WAY - STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 19+03.00
7 ACANTHUS LANE - STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 15+49.93
.IONOLIIL LANE - WA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 12+23.00
8 VQETIAN MALLOW CT - STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 13+83.66
VERONICA COURT - STA. 10400.00 TO STA. 12+60.42

IN THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES

WATER MAIN

CURS & GUTTER

RIGHT OF WAY

WATER SERVICE METER

TYPICAL WATER METER
AND F.H INSTALLATION (5O' RAW)

NOT TO SCALE

DISTRICT ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE
200 4 0 yrni
12%4PHI0 r41 Y

INDEX MAP
SCUT 7, 200'
FIGURE FIGURE 2

TWO LANE STREET AN INTERSECTION
6'
66 •= BLUE PAVEMENT MARKER
N8... FIRE HYDRANT

TYPICAL PAVEMENT MARKER
LOCATION -DETAIL °B'

THIS CETIFIES THAT THESE PLANS AD SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEN REVIEWED BY ND APE

NEEDY APPROVED BY BEAUMONT PERRY YNLEY WATER DISTRICT NO THAT THIS DISTRICT IS

WILLING AND ABLE TO SUPPLY WATER TO EVERY LOT IN THIS TRACT IN NICC RDANKE WITH TEE FIRE WATER LAWS ST IFOWNIA.
��.�` -_
R.E. NO. 15034
NOT TO 05,460
DIGS T
DIAL TOILI11/38
1(800) 2272600
At 0,°
Defor It a
Ol wwwoom oslImmooTCW60B11®PGAL A
OASIS OF BEARINGS:

BASED ON TIE LIRE BETWEEN STATIONS
'IRAK" AN) '144114' (POSITIONS PER
NATIONAL GEODETIC SLRVLY, NAD83,
EPOCH 1995.5) A5 SON ON N.B. 102,
PAGES 50 TNROA6H 65 OF RECORDS IN

CDIAYTY RECORDER'S OFFICE OF

RIVERSIDE MAIM, CALIFORNIA
N 52'49'02.84" E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUMONT
N0. 07.A.82
1-3/8' BRASS CAP AA889610 LARKED
"CITY B.M. 7'. LOCATED AT TIE S.E.

CCY8ER 14711 AN) PEAASYLVANIA AVE.
59 FT. S'LY AND 22 FT, E'LY OF
CENTERLINE IN1emECTIp6, 2 FT. S'LY tr'
OF B.C.R.

ELEV.- 2678.277 (1982)
BY
MARK

DESCRIPTION
APPR.

DATE

ENGINEER

REVISIONS
0TY

CONSULTING
N
t,
ALL MECHANICAL FITTTMS TO BE RESTRAINED.

2. ALL HYDRANT TEES TO BE PU3H-W JOINT A FLANGE OUTLET.

3. ALL, JOINTS TO 8E RESTRAINED SHALL BE WITH U.S. PIPE, FIELD-LCN 350' GASKETS CR DISTRICT APPROVED EClU1.

4. ALL HYDRANT, DRAIN AN) BLOW-CcF LATERALS SHALL HAVE RESTRAINED JOINTS.

6. INSTALL RESTRAINED) JO1NT5 (TWO PIPE LEHO196) BEFORE AD AFTER N1 TEES, CRQ5SES NO ELBOWS (HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL), AS A PINDER.

6. ALL PROPOSED 4 INCH BLOW -CET AND AIR VACUUA VALVE A50066.1 S AT INTERFACE CDMECTICN& ARE TELPORARY.

7. DOIESTIC WATER MAIN STALL BE 81011 FA PPESSLRE PASS 209 D.I.P. UNDER STP84 DRAIN CROSSINGS. A 20 F00T LENGTH CIF DIP SHALL 8E CENTERED UDER TIE S1DFM DRAIN SUCH THAT NO WATER MAIN JOINTS ARE WITHIN 4' or THE OUTSIDE DIA7ETER 8F 11E STYURLDRAIN. THE CLEARVERTICALSEPARATION SHALL BE MINIMUM 8F CITE FOOT.

APPLICANTS ENGINEER CERTIFICATE
THIS CERTIFIES THAT ON Neu. 2444 2012(9. I HAVE REVIEWED TIE PLANS OF TIE MAJESTIC WATER 14. 5Y5131 FOR MI5 TRACT AND 'REY MEET THE REQU1RELENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA SECTION OF 15.

THE AMERICAN WATER WO'85 ASSOCIATION. AN) 11.E RIVERSIDE MINTY STANOATDS WHERE THE INSTALLATION IS WITHIN SAID COWRY, FOR MINIULI REQUIROENTS FOR SAFE PRACTICE IN 118 PRODUCTION AN) DISTRIBUTION OF WATER FOR OGLESTIC USE. 16.

TEE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MD IRWS ISSICN MAINS AT TIE POINT OF SPPLY TO 11115 TRACT

ARE AEEOAATE TO SUPPLY WATER TO ALL SECTIONS OF THE TRACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION. 5-21 OF TIE ABOVE QUOTED STANDARDS.

MECHAM_-74) R.E. NO. 57667 i1 DA(

GENERAL WATER NOTES

ALL WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'DISTRICT STANDARDS FOR THE FURNISHING OF LATERALS AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF WATER AND 00000100 WATER FACILTITES', LATEST REVISION. AND THE ADOPTED ADDENDUMS THERETO.

2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A CONTRACTOR UCENSED IN 7HE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXPERIENCED IN WATER UTIIJTY CONSTRUCTION.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FROM 111E DISTRICT AND PAY INSPECTION AND VALVE COVER DEPOSIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. .

4. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL PIPE SHALL BE -CEMENT MORTAR UNEO DUCTILE IRON PIPE MINIMUM PRESSURE CLASS 150 WITH PUSH -ON JOINTS.

5. FOR SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN WATER AND RECYCLED WATER, STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER UNES, SEE RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD N0. 609 AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES GUIDANCE MEMO NO. 2003-02, DATED OCTOBER 16, 2003.

6. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (TELEPHONE N0. 1-B00-227-2600) FOR LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILTIIES, IW0 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.

7. CONTRACTOR SHALT. O8TANN NECESSARY PERMITS FROM CRY OF BEAUMONT AND/0R RIVERSIDE COUNTY, AS APPROPRIATE, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

8. ALL FIRE HYDRANI5 SHALL BE TYPE JONES 3765 (WET BARREL) 6' x 4' x 2.5' x 2.5' OUTLET, INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DISTRICT STANDARD PLATE N0. 1-1.

9. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DISTRICT AT (951) 845-9581 TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ON THE WATER LMUTY INSTALLATION.

10. NO EXISTING DISTRIBUTION 5oSILM VALVE SHALL BE OPERATED 8Y THE CONTRACTOR.

DISTRICT PERSONNEL WILL OPERATE ALL NECESSARY VALVES

11. ND DEVIATORS FROM THESE PLANS SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DISTRICT.

12. EXISTING WATER MAINS SHALL NOT BE TAKEN OUT OF SERVICE FOR MORE THAN 4 HOURS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL WATER USERS AFFECTED BY THE SHUTDOWN A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE ACTUAL SHUTDOWN. INDICATE THE DATE AND

PRECISE HOURS THAT THE MAIN WILL BE TAKEN OUT OF SERVICE

13. FIRE FLOW FOR THIS PROJECT IS 1000 GPM AT 20 P51 RESIDUAL I CERTIFY MAT TIE DESIGN OF TIE WATER SYSTEMS IS IN /CO(DAICE 01111 TIE Imo. 6) REQUIRTrk_PRESYRIBIED BY TIDE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE OEPARIIENT.

TIF2AleC
MICHAEL S. SUTTON R.E. ND. 57667 DATE

CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE JOB SITE

CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCROH PRACTICES,

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY

FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION -OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING

SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTYD THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE WOE TO APPLY

CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE UMRED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS, AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR

FURTHER AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD DESIGN PROFESSIONAL HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LUBIU1Y, REAL OR ALLEGED. IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OP WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL.

Q INSTALL 8' DIP (GLASS 150) 8A05ILL AND BEDDING
PER BCVWD STANDARD PLATE N0. 6 (36" MIN. COVER)
0 INSTALL TYPE JONES 3765 6'04'%2.5'02.5" NET BARREL FIRE HYDRANT ASSF1aY (GASS-A RATED) PER EOM STANDARD PLATE N0, 1-1
0 INSTALL 8" PLG X MU ADAPTER CESTRAINED
O INSTALL 2' AIR RELEASE AND VACUUM VALVE ASSEIEI-Y PER DCVO STANDARD PLATE NO. 5
Q INSTALL 8.08'06' FLANGED TEE
© INSTALL B' FLANGED GATE VALVE PER BOND STANDARD PLATE ND. 2 0 INSTAL 1' COPPER SERVICE LINE, TYPE K, PER BCVND STANDARD PLATE © 6010VE TEIPORARY 4' BLOW OFF.

Q REMOVE TOPORARY 2' AIR AND VACUA RELEASE VALVE ASSDE1LY 10 CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN LINE INTERSECTION PER DETAIL 'A' ON MEET 1 CL INSTALL ELIE REFLECTIVE FIRE HYDRANT PAVELEN1 MANORS PER DETAIL 'B' SLEET 1.

CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN LINE INTERSECTION PER DETAIL 'D' ON SHEET 1 Q INSTALL 6' 45' ODE RESTRAINED
14 INSTAL 8' 22.5' ace RESTRAINED
Q INSTALL 4' DRAIN PFR 80,00 STANDARD PLATE ND. 4-1
16 REMOVE DUSTING 8" END CAP AND JOIN 8' DIP
1© INSTALL a' ETD GAP
19 INSTAL 18' FLB X MJ ADAPTER RESTRAINED
INSTAL 18'018 118' FLANGED TEE
© INSTALL 16' FLANGED BJTIIIFLY VALVE PER BL,WD STAM)ARD PLATE NO. 2 ® INSTALL 8.06' REDUCER
19 ND, 6-2 AND PLATE NO 12 - - 125
1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY

FIRE DEPARTMENT

APPROVED BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
BY: A.E. DATE /-2.- 07

4.975 LF.
17 EA.
19 EA.
4 EA.
6 EA.

E.A.

FA.

EA.
1 EA.
6 Ell.
23 EA.
1 EA.
6 EA.
3 EA.
1 EA.
2 EA.
2 EA.
2 EA.
1 EA.
2 EA.
1 EA.

CONTRACTOR SHED. NOTIFY THE OSIRICT AT (951) 845-9581 TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE FOR SIDEWAUKS.

CONTRACTOR SHED. CONFORM TO THE STREET DICAVATION REPIACEMENT STANDARDS OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT.

AIR VACUUM RELEASE ASSEMBLIES PER DISTRICT STANDARD PLATE N0. 5 SHALL BE INSTALLED At ALL HIGH POINTS ON 111E WATER MAIN. ADDITIONAL ASSEMBUES

OVER THOSE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS MAY BE NECESSARY WHEN SUBSTRUCTURES

REWIRE A CHANGE IN UNE OR GRADE OF THE WATER LINE

17. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL MINIMUM 1" COPPER, TYPE K, SERVICE LATERALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 0)51095 SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON DISTRICT STANDARD PLATE 6-2, AND PLATE 12

18. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AI- RECONNECTS WITH DISTRICT PERSONNEL PRIOR TO ANY CONNECTIONS OR RETIREMENTS OF ANY DISTRICT FACILITIES.

19. CONTRACTOR SHAD. RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS Al' 1EES. ELBOWS, DEAD ENDS, ETC. AS INDICATED ON THE PLAITS A5 A MINIMUM, SEE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTE 5 ON SHEET 1.

20. CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR ALL COSTS FOR THE CORRECTION OR REMOVAL AND

REPLACEMENT OF DEFECTIVE WORK, AND ALL ADDITIONAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS THE CRY, COUNTY OR DISTRICT MAY INCUR ON ACCOUNT OF DEFECTIVE WORK.

INCLUDING THE COSTS OF ADDTIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE, PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT, INSPECTION, TESTING AND .OTHER SERVICES.

21. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BLUE REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RNER5IDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 'GUIDELINES FOR FIRE HYDRANT MARKINGS' LATEST REVISION AND DETAIL B' ON SHEET 1.

22. ALL FIRE HYDRANT BARR ARE TO BE CHROME YELLOW WITH TOPS AND NOZZLE CAPS PAINTED WITH THE FO0' WING CAPACITY -INDICATING COLOR SCHEME; CLASS -A GREEN.

23. ALL DRY -UTILITIES SHALL 8E L0061ED ON OPPOSITE PROPERTY UNE FROM WATER SERVICE LATERAL OR NO CLOSER THAN 2' TO ANY WATER SERVICE LATERAL

24. ALL PIPE SHALL BE HYDRO TESTED, DISINFECTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO FINAL CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATER UNES.

25. ALL MATIMGALS SH4ALL BE OF DOMESTIC ORIGIN AND NOT OF FOREIGN MANUFACTURE

28. CO U� N �TL� IN AUTOCAD FORMAT
OF THE ICI 6 APPR CORO DRAWIN - D1GIS': DORAL DATA DEFINITION TABLES.

PER DISTRICT STANDARDS, PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE -OF THE WORK.

27. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH TO THE DISTRICT COPIES OF ALL SOIL COMPACTION TEST REPORTS FOR THE INSTALLED WATER MAINS PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK.

28. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH TO THE DISTRICT INTERSECT TIE PLATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH DISTRICT STANDARD PLATE NO. D-2 FOR ALL VALVE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK.

PRIVATE ENGINEER'S NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR(S)

EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTNTIES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON 1HESE PLANS ARE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF AVAILABLE RECORDS. TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE THERE ARE NO DUSTING MUTES EXCEPT THOSE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS THE.

CONTRACTOR
RAND A OMIS UHERR UNESED TO TAKE OR STRUCTURES NOT SHOW ON THE PLANS, AND I5 CITIES REQUIRED FOR THE PROTECTION OF, AND A DAMAGE TO THESE ONES OR STRUCTURES.

R SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ALL UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES CONCERNED BEFORE STARTING WORK.

THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE 3711/06 LIABLE FOR UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE

IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS OUANTTES SHOWN HEREON ARE PROVIDED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL QUANTITIES PRIOR TO BIDDING FOR CONSTRUCTION.

THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SIGNING THESE PIANO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THE ACCURACY AND ACCEPTABILITY OF THE DESIGN HEREON. IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES ARISING AFTER DETERITY MIMINIH�ARAN �EPTTABLE SOLLUUTIONpAND REVISING THE PLANSFORFOk PPROVALL BY THE RESPONSIBLE IN TRACT 044 TOTAL FH 11
OFF TRACT DO'J TOTAL FH 7
PLANNING ■ DESIGNS ODNGTRUOTIDN
74-110 COUNTRY CLUB DRVE, SURE 201
PALM DEMENT. CALFODNA 92280-7655
760-346-74SF FAX 760346.8;15• wwABF.eom
OA1E: L1.1271DLii
M S 80AGFON R.C.E. 57667 • Ex0. 12-31-2001
DESIGN
CFR
DRAWN BY:

PAN
DECKED BY:

MSS
SCALE:
1'•40'
DATE:

APRIL. 2008
Se M1ADER
20100666

BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Riverside County, California
Da" let/

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA

WATER IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 31488-7

TITLE SHEET
GENERAL NOTES • VICINITY MAP • INDEX MAP
LOCATED WITHIN TIE +0114 OF SE0T7CN 2, T 3 S, R 1 1, SBI IN TIE CITY Cr MAIYYB, CALIFORNIA
Pardee Homes

S H E E
1 OF 8 SHEETS
MORE NUE.

FILE NO
H:\PDATA\20100666\CADD\LAND\DLV\IMPROVE\WATER\666DW701.DWG MIGUELLOPEZ 11/28/06 9:19 om

I _I t t- i
-t
01 -
i I -- H.-+.11----j.-1---1----H--h--!--f-.4.- -t_i--1
-- I r -+ * j 4- 1-1 I 1t r [._ jyyyyyy -4 ry 1-.JiI I
7 - i f- -it- F-- - -, r -T I 1. t _I L . i I -! -I -*--t L i 1 ! 1 1 I ! »-. ( -I * 1--.� -
I .I, I. I . ., - �- 1 -1--- I I T I _i T
I
I I
_ I _I- 1,_1.
10 T r- I- • --I
`o
b' 1 , I
rl "l 1 i is • . ,
'S± -0.0000-.♦-, .-{ t - --I-- ✓-.-1---I _ t ---,-
T -I 1I I i I Jr ! i i i :
-7171--110.• iI 1 i--t ' 1 -.r L-1 $41- 1 } . ' I ---r
1 f
I i i I I t f_ ! -! i 8;lFt"t-i- I r.-_--r_-_
4Ij _ r i ,_ I.`, --r- -,
.Jt- r -r 1 i - 81- I 1 -I 'I
LIB _i1 _ 1'8 ._ 4 -F-L-- j --r_ _t-- i---}-! F
a
.� • -,--, ±-t i i -. _ I I I I 1 !
I
! it ?-` I H r i
---- --' -- ! -' -L -t-1-- -- _I - -'-- -1- L 1 ---"J... _-- ,1 1-1-H ! I � �N=-_ � i� I j 1 42 E,F' I I j 1 f,---!'- -- -
J _i
r
r i l �� I I i I I t I - in
N - - 1 I - �_- - -1
I, 1.- ; 1 .I I 1 I .... .1 -f .i
+ F +-F- o LF a{ I -, F -f I r.
i I I- J, I i , i +
i s t- F r 1-
1 ._ 1- -'• `- - I-. JDI1v .. I_. ..1._ 1 _. _F. _I } 11 ...1 ._1 (.. , _r i. 1. - �j -" i`
_ I b2
T -11-
+
it'
i
i I fff - ' . r --I I- ' i r i
L L.. 1 t •i i' -1[. ..1, i I_

1. f f 4 t I
' 1 F 1 I I I. ,I I i J I _ _
I 1 F--- I -L ! . 1 ! I -1 I
f.,1-1-
_ T I -i_- I -+ ---_ 11 -� a ---i-{ 1-- + I. . - I l i -r- 1 I
I
I I I 1
I I _ _
' y. .a { �. ) I I [ I ' . t I r 1. I- i 1 I T
I
4_,
- `__4„.4_4_4_4.4_
[_--,,,--1. { r _ _ j. _ ! I , I I , T --i-t-- , I I I 1 i i - 1 11-6:164-- T r-'-_,• -I-i--t- •F-1---'.1----.1._, i , - C L i_1 y. . ._-- i l _j .r., 7.� { i h i.1 I. _..I- .ms-rINq ORME.I F .1.. ,I __+. .__.-. �__I_ .. 1__f _I_ - _ j... . ,_ { :. . 1 .-_• .. .i... .l �_.. J. .._ �.. .4 _.I J._ I i . . _ .I _ P'; 1 • 10 F!If ! r i I P CPOSED ININ- I I I• I I I i , 1 1 I ! ! ! I I I I 1 T 1 • it
.._; I -+ -- 1--r- --f 1. �. _1_.t 1-- 4- 4-SUI'3'AOEro -RI "r -L _ -. I- I r r }' -I -i -- �- t -T r _ _ .r I-1
'�-Y r _ r-_ -r--I- -F-+ 1 r 1._.. i
1 I H •,t,..,!,: L T--. _- - f. {. I _I _ I.. . i _ I. ... I. . . i -- -. _ , ! j f I I _ .I ' ,- , 1- j I 1-- - 4 - -: --F -1 - ,-- -, I- rt- "'�- ' �I - I -y _"- �-+. {-_. i - { ; _"."- - - , --1- -� .. �- i... ,. . r � .1 .._ !._ II
I' 1
1 . 1 L..
+
i
E 1 1 I t�
I I
I
f r ti i f17 r II' {' I -dodli r' i Ili l I 1 J [ I. , {' I r- I ; Wi_.1 f .,1'!,
4/ -L, -1,'--1 . -111
I1.._L I . ._ '. _ � i _+ .__t-L J. � L._i_. i. t { .f_. ._I 1_ .I 1 +.+. + {_ _ L_ _. }- ",- _ i

1. ! _. _.. . - I- f__: _.t_ -. I 1 . r
ill=
I i I ? I r ! i � ' * - i i 1 t 1'- L - I - L ..F.- -..,� . h N»I - 1.._ 1 .. . 'l - ( - I i
t r
I! F•
_ � � I Il I -! a___ � . ..___... - ---.:-t- f-..i.__� _ .F F _L t.� -. � . . .1._J. .._�._;.... ' .)
I IP .. _' �`� I W
if 1! i C It j r,-__71-117-_/..._11__i _ 1. I r 1
+- I+ --I--1- C-+� +- -f-- : -{--a-' I--14-- --r,--F-- 11 �-- »- t -.t ., . ,. ;_ ,',. .!... .1.._._
-,-1- ----r`i-...---- - - .{t{1���r-_+-r-H } .. '._7 J_... _.r 11-:i ..fir { --i- t_-i--1-J- --J- , +--i ' -I .li _L. ._ . i. 1 . . . . I. _ ! . _1..-- - - .� �.i 1_ . . i! 1 _I t i I _i WI I ! f I 7 t -t r.�i. l 8�,.1. 1 C . I .. 4 13 L_. .-_.L..._.. q _-l .. 1 -. .r 1 _ i.. r ._: . L. .. -1 . -I r - �. J L.

I f f I
}
�-----g r .s_.,-! - - --� ---F- +1L-*- t �-+- - --- -L-1- - -!-'r 1 ,- r -t -t --- Y --' I - - i --- r +--- ,--1.--,--j---- -+---t--+ I } ___ , I i-
�::... --.-- - ,.c_ ... ,. .. _ i_ ._ _ --t- .-,I . .-. ,,y._. 1 ffi . I: .. .I ._. . - _ _ I .._ J.. I I r - F -• I , I- - - i._ �_ _.'--I -- .I _.I
Kg yI •
I
,x I I , ! ! "� -- ^.,. K S I .IT. r'i'-w.:�T- !'-I- ,- t_ -I._ 'r• -41 r - I I I I � ( I I T I ! Ct11 I
o- ---1 �. F _ _. _..._, f t --t --r ! : E.l t-- -`I,'°Ip- t--�--1.- ` ...F-- `� • - -- -- ----r _ _-"?"': `F- �., -i r--�" r 1 J --r. - r-- - i. .y. - -'-- - - - ---- i---- j- '� n
W� - r -I { I
- -..I -. .J-- • --'-- ---- - -- ,, - --'- ; - - n ,i _i_ I _: I--- - L I 'I-� - 1. i _ I _ ! t • PIij, . _ . - !1 -ffi 1 1 �' +n i 1 1 ' I i f
1 -4---1--1-4-1
T "i T 4 �� rf , , , I �-�- � ..., �-r (� �'-? 81 .to 7g m r --y 1 i y r . . -� .T -I {_ _._I � I _t 4_ -. . I.._._i - =. _.1- ._ _ _ ._.1+ 11 1 .. ._ _.l _ .. .. t.. i _I-. _�. .. _ . __ ._..I _.I_ L. . . •
-1-1 I r' F 1 i 1 � 1 r-; I 1.--r6,60' -1 -r r -I --r : I r- f- 0 I I 1 I C r I
f 1 _.
1 rti"
i ..
t t +
C_
.�. t .8r_D.1R. f-CL?4SS-130 } t .L_Y 1 -1-
1 11 12
TRACT
31468-8
0‘21.21
o�� 91 a,
see N%
(STREET STATIONS)
10+00.00 YARROW LANE
12 69.00 EDELWEISS DRIVE

E INTERSECTION

THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL

NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR/OR LIABLE FOR

UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE
PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE

IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE
PREPARER OF THESE PLANS.

THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SIGNING THESE PIANS IS

RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THE ACCURACY AND
ACCEPTABILITY OF THE DESIGN HEREON. IN THE

EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES ARISING AFTER COUNTY
APPROVAL OR DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE

PRIVATE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

FOR DETERMNING AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AND

REVISING THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY THE

COUNTY,
10100.00

YARROW LANE
12+15.00

EDELWEISS DRIVE
NOTE

ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON
ARE TRUNCATED. ADD 2000' TO

THE ELEVATIONS TO OBTAIN THE

ACTUAL ELEVATIONS
NOTE

WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A
GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

NOTE

SEE SEPARATE PLANS FOR

SEWER & STORM DRAIN
SYSTEMS.

PROP. 8'
SEWER
8' END CAP
2' AVR k
JOIN EXIST. 8' WATER
5 13
.„34e
.0%0'1.0 30
1,1 1'
I
a to
n
4B •
j-�r " I 1 ' I i !-
i _ _1 1 7 1 t
iRAIPFD I I } I-' J- - I I r
T _..F__r,. r-1--t---r. .r.. ._y.._ .r.LICI: L- 1-{ '- -t + - --I -f -r I'- 3 f i-- +'-T-'-- I_. -- - Js3 L . i ., .. I. J I . .i I -. ! . �. .. •_ . i ---- f - -. i.. , I _ ' I 1 PROFILE SCALE:
a .. k.9 MASS -180 --{{ ;.._ T -'_ _. . r --- r 1 - : - - , I - -t- 14 YARROW LANE'
8 \
TRACT 31468-7
F 29
I
obi
(STREET STATIONS)
12+47,30 YARROW LANE
- 104-00.00 ORCHIS LAZE

V INTERSECTION
12+46.46

YARROW LANE
10+00.00

ORCFIIS LANE

WATER DATA
Q

DELTA/BRIT
RADIUS
LENGTH

TANGENT
1 N89'27'18 -W
141.48'
tr 72'3'33'
21E.OD" '
755.91'
212.07'
3 H16.54 a5'W
-

63.11'
-
4 N78'30'22'W
-

18.00'
5 t'49:8().-2•17,1/
-- 07.48'
-
6 N8400 22 N 1
_ _. 42.86'
-.

DIGS T

DIAL 'TOLL PREEB
1(800)227-2600
BehroYonDls
TO®0MON0UNIMBAImOP8OOLNNCAInG mA
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

BASED ON THE LIAE BETWEEN STATIONS
IRAK" AND "MATH" (POSITIONS PER

NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY, NAM,
EPOCH 1995.5) AS SHOWN ON M.B. 102,
PACES 50 11801K11 65 OF RECORDS IN

COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE OF

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
N 52'49'02.8411 E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUMONT
NO. 07.A.82
1-3/8' BRASS CAP MgAAENT HARKED
"CITY B.M. 7'. LOCATED AT TIE S.E.

COWER 14TH AND PENNSYLVANIA AVE.,
59 FT. S'LY AND 22 FT. E'LY or
CENTERLIAE INIU2oECTIOV, 2 FT. S'LY CF -
OF B.C.R.

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982)
BY
ARK

DESCRIPTION
APPR.

DAZE

ENGINEER

REVISIONS
CITY
15 16 17
28 TRACT 31468-7
/ 27
/r
5' WIDE PUBLIC

UTILITY EASEENT
■ ■ ■

CONSULTING
26 PLANNING ■ DESIGN ■ CONSTRIJOTnN
74-130 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SURE 201
PALM DESERT, CAUFORMA @7280-1855
760-348-748P FAX 7600408815. wwwABF.com
41/
-!7 C1 HAEL S. SUTTON
DAT�IMl `
R.C.E, 57862 • E 1--3-r-2007
5' WIDE PLBLIC

UTILITY EASEMENT
DESIGN 8Y:

ERR
DRAWN BY:

J1
CHECKED BY:

BOG
SCALE
1". 40,
DATE:

APRIL, 2006
JOB WEER:
20100666
®®806

GRAPHIC SEAL

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
0 INSTALL 8' DIP (CLASS 150) BACITILL MD RECORD
PER BCV11D STANDARD PLATE NO. 6 (36' YIN. COVER)
0 INSTALL TYPE .DIES 3765 6"X4'%2.5"X2.5' WET BARREL FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (CLASS -A RATED) PER BCVRD PLATE MO. 1-1
0 INSTALL 8' FI8 X 41.1 ADAPTER RESTRAINED
® INSTALL 2" AIR 131 FOCF MD VACUUM VALVE ASSEMBLY PER BOAS STANDARD PLATE NO. 5
0 INSTALL 8"X8"%8' FLANGED TEE
0 INSTALL 8" FLANGED GATE VALVE PER BOND STANDARD PLATE NO. 2 07 INSTALL 1" COPPER SERVICE LINE, TYPE K, PER BOAID STANDARD PLATE ND. 6-2 AND PLATE NO 12 0 REMOVE TEMPORARY 2' AIR MD VACUUM RELEASE VALVE ASSEMBLY 10 CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN LINE INTERSECTION PER DETAIL "A" CH SFfET 1 ® INSTALL 911E REFLECTIVE FIRE HYDRANT PAVE4ENT UNRI:RS PER DETAIL "B' SHEET 1 13 INSTALL 8' 45' BOO RESTRAINED
14 INSTALL 8' 22.5' BOO RESTRAIEED
16 REMOVE EXISTING 8" END CAP AND JOIN 8' DIP

BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Riverside County, California
Approved By.

Ise REIOHENBERGER
District Engineer
TICE Nn 18034
FOR:

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA

WATER IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 31468-7

YARROW LANE
ETA 10.6400 TO STA 17+0000
LOCATED IN TIE NW 1/4 5' gC 2, T 7 5, R I W, SEM

IN TIE CITY OF ECAUONT, CALIFORNIA
Pardee Homes
SHEET
OF 8 SHEETS
OOHING WAIF.

LE
11/28/06 9:20 am

I•
I i ri
F I - 6 0 h I
I'
r + I - • 1 1
1 i- 1 -
- - 1- 1 r- 1 + -' 1 L - • -- J
� L . i .. L . i I_ _ � .. i - I - II i ' • 1 _ r . l i- .) _ I 1 _I + 1_ I I- T--- l + 1.
1 I1 , I I I I 1
1 i 1 I I I - 1- r I _+ 1
i- t -.1------1'- I- -� 4 -I--i`_O -i'? -- _r 1 t ._I - -i-_is70 I -1- I! 1• E ! ! +---1-1-1 -t-1-
' -11
;
i- 1 1 J. I L _.i 1-a ,
- ! i j, 4 r! ti
�. r... - - '}-- i �.. _ + �- i i- _(/i 1 .. L T- 0 - I'4:W76T .9-..1-..-!. 1'!'_'1__ I rr(p I 1
--1- - -j 1- I - I- I -( I 1- I 1 -.
-
1 I i
i I I
I I •
(
t j. . 4..-1- i -- ._[_ 1 J j. I 4_ - ,.-
sda 4
� ,, N i 1 I
- t
1"h-.- I- ; -- . I .1-- --t-_ 1 4, -i--
1 T. } -i'-'14, 1 F 1 ii
-I - i-.-1- I 1. __1- i---1---,.. I-. '1 .. _
_
i 1- 1 I -+ I- I I - 1- Y I-1-
17 t

THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PUNS WILL

NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR/OR LIABLE FOR

UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE
PUNS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE
IN WRITING ANO +UST BE APPROVED BY THE
PREPARER OF THESE PLANS.

T - }•
a
--TS+ H
1 1
J I -1
I , I '1 -� O'va
'ic r 4
i I 1 1 I
I
25 I
I

THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SIGNING THESE PLANS IS

RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THE ACCURACY AND
ACCEPTABILITY OF THE DESIGN HEREON. IN THE

EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES ARISING AFTER COUNTY

APPROVAL OR DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE

PRIVATE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

FOR DETERMINING AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AND

REVISING THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY THE
COUNTY.

NOTE

ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON
ARE TRUNCATED. ADD 2000' TO

THE ELEVATIONS TO OBTAIN THE

ACTUAL ELEVATIONS
NOTE:

WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A
GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

NOTE:
• SEE SEPARATE PLANS FOR

SEWER & STORM DRAIN
SYSTEMS.
18+61.51

YARROW LANE
16+70.75

POINSETTIA NAY
cialj154705

I JOIN EXISTING
2 1---
19 14+98.75

POINSETTIA WAY
14+98.75
TIBER FLOWER DR.
pip
T

DIAL TOLL PRES
1(800)227-2600
AOAMNIVONffi
Yo. 09714
@♦tBBe1BDsaYIDA18RarIIOIM ANCAUJR0UA
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

BASED ON DE LIRE BETWEEN STATIONS
TRAK" AND "MAIN' (POSIT7D'VS PER
NATIONAL GEODETIC 011990Y, N4D83,
&VCR 1995.5) AS 910108 ON M.B. 102,
PACES 50 DROWN OF RECORDS IN
MAN RECORDER'S OFFICE 09
RIVERSIDE COL1IY, CALIFORNIA
N 52'49'02.84" E
BENCHMARK: CITY OF BEAUMONT
NO. 07.A.82
1-3/8' BRASS CAP M4ANAE]VT MARRED
CITY B.N. 7'. LOCATED Al TrE S.E.

COMBER 14TH AN) PEMJSYLVANIA 46,.
59 FT. S'LY ARD 22 F7. E'LY OF
CENTERLINE INTERSECTION, 2 FT. S'LY OF
OF B.C.R.

ELEV.- 2678.277 (1982)
_
1 �
I
1 L - T
I
a 4� 1
L. . i- 1-- 1- t
1 I ! I. 1I i
i
- 1 -1 1 1.- 4 I 1- _ .- 4 ,
•1
1 1- T 1 1 .. _ I I . . .. 1 1 ! _.
ji
. , OxisrtNG I a I-
1 i k 1 +.. 1 1 • I 1 ri
I I I 1
T`
PJR- 6.9.11). I9�DI -
1 7 S +ACE of. Q. IPE _ ..f i I_ .
1! I I - 1- i 1 1 ;
t i I J -'-- �- r--- , r
J.__ --L-1._ - 1 - -.._-
I i
-I-
•Jp a
11 +I
.•
1 I
1 _ Lu
L I
I
I - t ) 1
1 h-
-t A -+ h---` 'r 1 --t, +
, i t 1 j
1 I I i--. P T` _. T r._I I k} _
1 1 I +-39.4* __ , r 1-I I -r- +- 1 I! k a1 + k_ !I '
1 1- 4. 1 1 : : :- : ill :1 1:?, i
1 I. 4 II I i i
I I 1
B1---1-L-1---.-r-6 ..i I
C -I -I- i -r- r 1- -1-- -4-I
4 41 I
r. 1 `7 ! i t REsraAljaED lDx1>s
1 1 --i 201.'631LF1 I i -1 7 1 -1 • 1 - I__. �- t --t_ -. .__ 23c3� Li' 1•
) tr ,' F L t
ti 4 i j,4„,
t
iI I I �Q I r �L , .,
1 t-1.......
' -�-I l J ;- I -4-4. I- -1
.;. i._1 LI _,._ .... .. .�.- _ • '- j8'10! Pk G 5- 50. 1 -I. , I . ..1. i 1. ' 19 (STREET STATIONS) 20 21 22
18+62.79 YARROW LANE
= 11072.05 POINSETTIA WAY
5 INTERS CUM:
16+78.551 �a�elf11 t.

XING 8 SS
O 2f'
I NR
-88
20 89
(STREET STATIONS
10000.00 POINSET IA WAY
. 14+98.75 TIGER FLOWER DRIVE

INTERSECTION

ENGINEER
•
R rllus YARROW LANE
SEE SHEETT7E
2d10
TRACT 31468-7
68 (STREET STATIONS)
20+63.50 YARROW LANE '

INTENSECTION
20+63.14

YARROW LANE
10400.00

ACANTHUS LINE
1p01E
�4EU 5.
� s
No. 57667 %
Exp. 12-31-2007
✓ ., CIY \. -
CON16Ulm NCG
F' -I
67 66
PROP.
30'SD
NSA
sio.LANE
.Y 4
30'5()
(STREET STATIONS)
22+92.75 YARROW LANE
= 10000.00 HEATH LANE

INTERSECTION
22+86.52

YARROW LANE
10400.00

HEATH LANE
TRACT' 31468-7

WATER DATA

TANGENT
1 DELTA/DRG
RADIUS
LENGTH
7 m400'2211

38.05' -
3 A-05'25'56'
T011.00'�

96.15'

48.11'
3 N99-' 1g
-
2470,191
-
4 dR 1? 26'39
460.00'

99.91'

50.15'
5 N77'00'39'11
-
122.22'
-
6 NO0'32'42 E
-

98.00 -
,S 0.0050-
i
16 POINSETTIA WAY PROFILE
40 8
40 e0 120

GRAPHIC SCALE
W
680
670

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
Q INSTALL 8' DIP (CLASS 150) BAOIFILL AND BEDDING
PER BCYND STANDARD PLATE N0. 6 (36' MIN. COVER)
0 INSTALL TYPE JONES 3765 6'%4'02.5'X2.5' NET BARREL FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (CLASS -A RATED) PER RCM STANDARD PLATE NO. 1-1 0 INSTALL 6' EL9 X MJ ADAPTER RESTRAINED
05 INSTALL 8'58'X8' FLANGED TEE
© INSTALL 8' FLAMED GATE VALVE PER 8CVWD STAN/AID PLATE N0. 2 Q7 INSTALL 1' COPPER SERVICE LINE, TYPE N, PER BCVWD STANDARD RATE NO. 6-2 AND PLATE ND 12 ( REMOVE TEIPORARY 4' BLOW OFF
Q RELINE TEMPORARY 2' AIR AND VACUUM RELEASE VALVE ASSOBLY 10 CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN LINE INTERSECTION PER DETAIL 'A" ON MEET 1 11 INSTALL BLUE REFLECTIVE FIRE Ii8ORANT PAVEIEJIT MARKERS PER DETAIL 'B' SHEET 1 13 INSTALL 8' 45' BEM) RESTRADED
16 REMOVE D41571ND 8' DD CAP AND JOIN 8' DIP
•PLANNING • DEMON W OONSTRUCTION
74-130 COUNTRY CLUB BRAE, SUITE 201
PAIA158060 ,, CALIFORNIA 92260-1855
780-096-746F FAX 760.006,8915. WRwRBF.com
DESIGN BY:

MANN RY:

JW.

OECIED 60
1155
SCALE:

1.- 40'
1 DATE:

APRIL. 2006
R.C.E. 57667 • E NA i2-51-2007 '" H130
DATE A k14
iQ(
_ 0100566

BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Approved By
Riverside Qounty, California

JG REICHENBERGER
District Engineer
RCE 80.91034
1 CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
FON:

WATER -IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 31468-7

YARROW LANE AND POINSETTIA WAY
STA 17+9000 TO STA 22+1662 AND 6TA 1&72761016.7075
LOCATE] IN 11E 66 1/4 OF SEC 2, Y3 5, R 1 W, SEW
IN THE 0ITY OF BEALKNT, 59.1098416
SHEET
3 17 _11_ SHEETS
00661NG NAT£
Pardee Homes
FILE NO.:
5 0
0 0
0 a
0 5
•

I-.� t
L _1 . _ .i. i I- -� 1 r- + 1 1_ . _ a 0 149- 1 r _I
I I
_ C r
T � I i I� � T
I . T.+ 4T11i L- 1
J.

II -1 1 SS$� i
J I.a F i- t' r I- I -I I if
Oi T 1+ f
f . t 1 t =� 1� m+
i I -- t . ..i 1 y I i_ i_ ( I In
I _ { _ i , E ..

J - - i - _4 - --{- r _+ { }..-F 4 _ ., 751E { ? ' I -4- _il i .. . -. -4--... _-y_. .14 ... ,-. - 1. -
I F I + t i I I PE' INE� I
-F { I i - I 1- INIT51 -F
1 ! 1 I
__._4._L._L_ LJ.Y..T.—_L. _.L 1_ L.....1. _.L.i._�1»I_ __i_�._l_..L .. _..1 _L.L _I_,:.._._,..._ __t_-._._:.. 18000-00
FL4IH LAN:
22186,52

74.6101 LAKE
45 (STREET STATIONS)
= 22452.75 YARROW LANE
9 INTF10SECTIITd
BEND

THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL

NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR/OR LIABLE FOR

UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE
PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE

IN WRIRNG AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE
PREPARER OF THESE PLANS.
10 11
8EE E LANE

10.22.42 12' so
51490 B. WATER
THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SIGNING THESE PLANS 15

RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THE ACCURACY AND
ACCEPTABILITY OF THE DESIGN HEREON. IN THE

EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES ARISING AFTER COUNTY
APPROVAL OR DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE

PRIVATE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
FOR DETERMINING AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AN5

REVISING THE PUNS FOR APPROVAL BY THE
COUNTY.

NOTE

ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON
ARE TRUNCATED. ADD 2000' 10

THE ELEVATIONS TO OBTAIN THE

ACTUAL ELEVATIONS
NOTE;

WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A
GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

NOTE:

SEE SEPARATE PLANS FOR
SEWER Sc STORM DRAIN
SYSTEMS.
9/
I I 10+71..p.118' SD
1C1N8 8 WATER
t
I 1 --- r -1 - ' r -
I
87 :off + ! I I I
- +- r.. 48'1DCI• - 115(1 '--1 I 1 - I
12 13 14 15

HEATH LANE
TRACT 31468-7
F,5
98 99
63 102

WATER DATA
D

DELTA/BRG
RADIUS
LENGTH

TANGENT
1 #18.7'58'21'E
—

4.24'
2 12'53'21

19.60'
—
3 N16'
—
8y3g.51'
—
44'Oa'D7'�
4' -
359.75— 93.01'
1—
5 1
44 (IC -WV # .734.0
62 Q ; Q 61
[41,9"g
DIGS T
DNLTOLLA t80
1(800)227-2600
Al4 BatwaYo Gq4
ouDIr
Tammrmmlo 9QYESAIAiOPe00719931CATLWYA
BASIS OF BEARINGS.

BASED ON 1FE LIFE BETWEEN STATIONS
TRAK' AHD "MATH' (PO01710045 PER
NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY, NA083,
EPOCH 1995.5) AS. SHOWN ON M.B. 102,
PAGES 50 MOWN 65 OF RECORDS IN
cowry 800540ER S OFFICE OF

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
N 52'49'02.84" E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUMONT
NO, 07,A.82
1-3/8' BRASS CAP MONAAENT MARKED
CITY B.M. 7'. LOCATED AT THE S.E.
0509ER 14111 AND PENNSYLVANIA AVE.,
59 FT. S'LY AND 22 FT. E'LY OF
CEMEHLIAE INTERSECTION, 2 FT. S'LY O
OF B.C.R.

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982)

ENGINEER

OESCRIPRON
APPR.

BATE

REVISIONS
60 a
J 1_
103
-01
TRACL 314687
59 I
I
I
16 16+72.96

IEATN LATE
19403.00

BEGONIA WAY
58 sees 4" L4/Av
/p 8
100
107
\1 i
(STREET STATIONS)
16081.86 FEATH LANE
= 29al. 11 BEGONIA WAY
9 INTERSECTION
•
1-
'
r

PROFILE SCALE
HDRIZ: 1" - 40'
VERT, 1" • 4'
40 0 40 80 120

GRAPHIC SCALE

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
©1 INSTALL 8" DIP (CLASS. 150) BAC10'ILL AND BEDDING
PER RCM) STANDARD PLATE NO. 6 (36' MIN. COVER)
0 INSTALL TYPE JONES 3765 6'%4'X2.5'%2.5' WET BARREL FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (CLASS -A RATED) PER BCVWD STANDARD PLATE NO. 1-1 Q INSTALL 1' COPPER SERV10E LINE, TYPE K. PER BCVWD STMDIJB) PLATE NO. 6-2 AND PLATE NO 12 0 INSTALL 6L1E REFLECTIVE FIRE HYDRANT PAVEM:NT MARKERS PER DETAIL 'B' SHEET 1 13 INSTALL 8" 45' BETD RESTRAINED
Q INSTALL 4' DRAIN PER BCVWD STANDARD PLATE NO. 4-1
PLANNING • DESIGN • CON•TRDCT LIN
74-190 COUNTRY CLUB ENNE, SURE 201
•' PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 62260-1655
CONSULTING 760-546-7466 F02 7603462315 • , NAFIB .eom
MtiTTAEL S. SUTTON
DATE: 11,12.4L, CC
R.C.E. 57667 • EXP. 12-31-2007

OESLG ORR
DRANK BY:

JW
DECKED BY:

MSS
SCALE
1"= 40'
DATE:

APRIL, 2006

J)B NLIBEIE
20100666

BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Riverside County, California
APPlyred 95'
.1G %TEICHENBERGER
Di64ict Engineer
SCE Na 18034
/41:14€

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA

WATER IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 31468-7

HEATH LANE
STA 11413.00 TO 8TA 16.7288
LOCATED IN TIE NW 1/4 OF SEC 2, T 0 S, R 1 8, SBI
IN TIE CITY Of IEAUII 41, CALIFORNIA
SHEET
4 OF 8 SHEETS
eUW110 RAZE
FOR:

Pardee Homes
FILE 163a
H: \PDATA\20100666\CADO\ LAND \DLV\IMPROVE \ WATER \666DW704. DWG MIGUELLOPEZ 11/28/06 9:24 am

•
110+17.0018' WATER
XING 6' SS
10+00.00

ORCHIS LANE
12+46.44

YARROW LANE
11 (STREET STATIONS)
10+00.00 ORCHIS LANE
= 12+47.34 YARFMW LAPS
q INTERSECTION

THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL

NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR/OR UABLE FOR

UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE
PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST DE

IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE
PREPARER OF THESE PLANS.
{
I
I �J
' i ._
wyI
t FyVj 1 1
Oa.,..f 14., a,),.4......_4. 7T
r
=- N'1 I &I ,-1'$ a-1- 1-701 , I
-81 E1,-.7--2;t;-1 117'.i t
1 1
w-1- -I- • r -.i. I. .._; .. 1.
_YI I 21 LFI I I
' r 1 I
I
1---I- 1 - -'I -;--1 i _ 1 283.41ILF-i---i--1
y. ... I I I .... ... . I. I. __8 -e.ILP.I.CLAS-150)
I .L I. i ,A . . I : .a ,. I I i s ..
11 12

YARROW LANE
SEE SHEET 2
10 THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SIGNING THESE PLANS IS

RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THE ACCURACY AND
ACCEPTABILITY OF THE DESIGN HEREON. IN THE

EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES ARISING AFTER COUNTY

APPROVAL OR DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE

PRIVATE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

FOR DETERMINING AN ACCEPTABLE SOLURON AND

REVISING THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY THE
COUNTY.

NOTE:

ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON
ARE TRUNCATED. ADD 2000' TO

THE ELEVATIONS TO OBTAIN THE

ACTUAL ELEVATIONS
NOTE

WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A
GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

NOTE•

SEE SEPARATE PLANS FOR

SEWER & STORM DRAIN
SYSTEMS.

LF
, RESTRAINED
.. 1 .!JOINTS_
f._. --I
l I-
i
r f
• ,i

ORCHIS LANE
130 129 •
PROP.

SLIER
30 32
0 TRACT 31468-7
I
13 1-
a_L..1

1. _.. _- -L_.! B I D!I-,R,-q_A`.S-i154--! .1_. 1.

J .L 1 .L
1203.41

ORCHIS LANE
10400.0D

VENETIAN MALLOW COURT
14 15
000e)
(STREET STATIONS)
12+85.53 ORCHIS LANE
= 10+00.00 VENETIAN MALLOW COURT
¢ INTERSECTION
0 123
— rd

VENETIAN MALLOW COURT
SEE SHEET 8
WA1Ltt DATA
4 DELTA/BRG
RADIUS
LENGTH

TANGENT
H10-3907'

52.51'
2 A. 10.06.25
480.00'
FA6.26'

43.24'
361.00' 1¢58.5341'
74+40'
5_
N25.2404p.211'
,
B
B70'21,10'E
__ 14.14'
—
DIGS

DIAL TOIL AMEB
1(800)227-2600
Allmon*/ %Ta tDap
IA4bnYwlMy
WMOILI D®WSZVESAU64Y0PWIIMBINHJLffiUA

BASIS OF BEARINGS'

BASED ON THE LINE BETWEEN STATIONS
'TRAK' AND YI4TN' (POSITIONS PER
NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY, NA083,
EPOCH 1995.5) AS SHOWN ON 1.1,13. 102,
PAGES 50 T ROXif 65 OF RECORDS IN

COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE OF

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
N 52'49'02.84' E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUMONT
NO. 07.A.82
1-3/8' BRASS CAP 8491548NT MARKED
"CITY B.N. 7". LOCATE)) AT THE S.E.

CORNER 14TH AND PENNSYLVANIA AVE
59 FT. S'LY AAD 22 FT. ELY Or
CENTERLINE INTERSECTION, 2 FT. S'LY
OF B.C.R.

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982)
BT
AAA

DESCRIPTION
APPR.

DATE

ENGINEER

REVISIONS
OTY

4.1 CONSULTING
_r --Ti..__ __i__J '
L .
16 126 H TRACT 39468--7
j 12,5 7
1 �
45 124
45 eF,Z/
.94:670
s4,41
ywgy
6N
122
(STREET STATIONS)
16+44.36 ORCHIS LANE
20+00.00 BEGDNEA WAY
¢ INTERSECTION
120
121
I_.
- 1 I - FILL
©
1 40
, iI
�
= 1 I
1 i r r
1 ., i.-�--
! I _-L_i I .-

1.- L._
1 'I - .I i
•
r J.._,_
+
I
40 ' i. '' 1 _i 'I
90 120
gRAPHIC SCALE
PROFITPROFII C,�cr•AI EE,
HORIZ 1' a 40'
VERT: 1' = 4'

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
0 INSTALL B' DIP (CLASS 150) BAOffILL AND BEDDING
PER BOVWD STADA) PLATE NO. 6 (36' MIN. COVER)
0 INSTALL TYPE JONES 3765 6'X4'X2.5'X2.5' WET BARREL FIRE HYDRANT ASSEIEI_Y (CLASS -A RATED) PER BCVWD S M ARD PLATE NO. 1-1 Q INSTAL 8' FLG X MA ADAPTER RESTRAINED
Q INSTALL B'XVX6' FLANGED TEE
® INSTALL 8' FLANGED GATE VALVE PER BCVWD STMDARD PLATE ND. 2 0 INSTALL 1' COPPER SERVICE LINE, TYPE K, PER BM STANDARD PLATE N0. 6-2 AND PLATE NG 12. 10 OONSTRIICT WATER MAIN LINE INTERSECTION PER DETAIL 'A' ON SHEET 1 INSTALL BLUE REFLECTIVE FIRE HYDRANT PAVEMENT MARICES PER DETAIL 'B' SFEET 1 © INSTALL 8' 45' BEND RESTRAINED
PLANNING ■ DESMN W. CONSTRUCTION
74930 COUNTRY CLUB DONE, SUITE 201
PALM 051110 CALIFORNIA, 02260-165
760-346-7461. FAR 760.3468315• www.RBF.com-
DATE: ltt'iAILD(.

MICHAEL S. SUTTON
R.C.E. 57667 • EXP. 12-31-2007
DESIGN BY:

CRR
DRAWN BY:

JW
CHEOIED BY:

MSS
SCALE
1•= 40'
DATE:

APRIL. 2006
.D6 NADER
20100666

BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Riverside County, California
Approved BY.

UG REICHENBERGER
District EH9IR er
RCE No, 19034

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
FOR:

WATER IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 31468-7

ORCHIS LANE
8TA 1010000 TO STAN 16118
LOCATED IN TIE M 1/4 OR SEC 2, T 3 5, R I W, 581

IN TIE CITY OF ERAIADNT, CALIFORNIA
SHEET
5 OF E SHEETS
DRAWING NNE:

Pardee Homes
FILE NO.:

H:\PDATA\20100666\CADO\LAND\DLV\IMPROVE\WATER\6660W705.DWG MIGUELLOPEZ 11/28/06 9:26 cm

.4-._t 14, r T Im II -r 1
a.. 1 i_I ,i.1 --FIR 'I \F
' I ' L.. . I '• L. 7 - i ., .. -
--, . I - - . -I I --I --f-1
^ss i_. - _ I
-
I - I N I •-_ I- - 1
-1--4.--1r-----;----}r I t ' __ ..j.._i-
I -I f - 1 . -I , i
1, I i .i I I
1 1- , - d-1--1.,*,_ I j l
.r I-1 .. H 1 j - i 1. 4,-.F. a--
1 I _1 I _ I _ 4__1
1 1 ,

1. I I -
r 1 F- I •
10100.00

BEGONIA WAY
16+51.15

ORWIS LANE
122
123
124

THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL

NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR/OR LIABLE FOR

UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE

PLANS, ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE

IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE
PREPARER OF THESE PLANS.

RAIND 1
INNS, 1
10 (STREET STATIONS)
20+00.00 BEGONIA WAY
16+44.36 OR17r1IG LANE

ICE NTERSECT ION
1P1
T I
°ROS LANE
SEE SHEEfi 6

THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SIGNING THESE PLANS IS

RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THE ACCURACY AND
ACCEPTABILITY OF THE DESIGN HEREON. IN THE

EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES ARISING AFTER COUNTY
APPROVAL OR DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE

PRIVATE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

FOR DETERMINING AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AND

REVISING THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY THE
COUNTY.

NOTE:

ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON
ARE TRUNCATED. ADD 2000' TO

THE ELEVATIONS TO OBTAIN THE

ACTUAL ELEVATIONS
NOTE:

WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A
GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

NOTE

SEE SEPARATE PLANS FOR

SEWER & STORM DRAIN
SYSTEMS.
t --t1
1 i
.t `JIbR I- T- _
-A- ---r- I r # __ j ; __

4. 1 I .
1 1 1. 1 r 1
i +I
M
42 LF I •
1 JOI inn 1 .,
I
.. . -- ID) R5--C,AS5 j501. A } i- .. I -.. 1.
i
I LL.
1 -Hai tr[,92-- t -
I I
_T.. r4-fOi-
I
•
•
I _+
I I i I I I
T 1 1 I
289;341 Lt' I- - - I
L -; -
11 12 13
TRACT 31468 7 JONSEE OS E
SHEET
1pro7.go 8• WATER
WING 8 SS
N
t.
17 4c
117
12482.34

BEGONIA WAY
10+00.00

JONQUIL LANE
ft-

1. -I 74P I 1-1
4 L
{ I I
I - r... i...c4-ISTIW?•GRAi3E a - 1 . I _I.. t -. I.. ,. _ I_ t �.- uiB.�I -?a.}. i 1 _}_ H.J. r 1_{ -
: , 1
1_.�w ^ice I 1
i1 _ .+-1-7-- „~j 1 I i ... 1
1 I I i
-r-_-.. 1 :.-T.. I .,--!-T- -I-'-:''T�I`._I- I -T -.-
I I I ! I I -I , '' 1. 1. r 1 �4�
1 L TO 57
-Iq----
. '1
i �=III i s
,1 1 1 I �I I - If
-, 1 g L-417'4' -1 !-- 1 ' +
I �T•A
�R f
• �1
_.,fi I 1_I_._ 1 I_ 1
1_ i. -- .._ -1---!-
: !I !!4.!
;. . �. !- I .
'- T i 1. . 1 - -1-
1 1
I - .... L •I i
f
i 1 r
- {--f I
14 15
(STREET STATIONS)
)BEGONIAWAY BEGONIA WAY
11 00.00 JONQUIL LANE
INTERSECTION..., :::116014,-.31,54¢' , ,
116 tl 115
1 13
50 DIGALW

DIAL TOILIIRES
1(800)227-2600
u Il dine ooDij�
@wwwI030618ww 031181AwOPSDOIR®NCALRRWA
BASIS OF BE:ARINGS-

BASED ON THE LINE BETWEEN STATIONS
'TRAK' AND "ITATH' (POSITIONS PER
NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY. NA083,
EPOCH 1995.5) AS SHOWN ON M.B. 102.

PAGES 50 1150401/ 65 OF RECORDS IN

COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE OF
RIVERSIDE CoUVTY• CALIFORNIA
N 52.49'02.84" E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUMONT
NO. 07.A.82
1-3/8- BRASS CAP MOMAENT BARKED
CITY B.M. 7•. LOCATED AT TIE S.E.

COWER 14TH AN PENNSYLVANIA AVE.,
59 AT. STY AND 22 FT. ELY OF
CENTERLINE INIEJODECTION, 2 FT. S'LY Dr`
OF B.C.R.

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982)
BY
066

BESCBIPTON
APPR.

SE

ENGINEER

REVISIONS
CITY

C ON BU LTING
t - 1 r
T
Li,3166LA-�
-8- D+I-.P.-3,ASS77
16 j -
I
1 1() 1,
,
PROP. 8'
SEWER
57 109 61
TRACT 311468-7
WATeR DATA

TANGENT
Q

DELTA/BRG
LENGTH
T
N64 38'50-W
_.R4DTIUS
225.99'. -
2 a 1).54'14'
2182.00'
' 455.42'
2-:213.153'S
147833`Ik. W
-
188.63''
- -
6 N75'D6.36*
06 -
11=00'
-
6 NiC. 3134
- -

11.00 --•
7 N67.36'38'6
-

1.T8
-
8 N45.06 3.-1714
-

11.78 -
--1- -� r.
--
v 19
- + -
•
I
1 •- --4 6AO, _
1 I I1
-�--
a---{ 1 ` T
._.i.
t -I I
T----1 r -I-'
l
il- - -1- , 1• - i
-r I -i t
_f_,
It i
-.--. 1 - t--6-'0; ,-1-1----i-1------r,--- -i
,I
xi
107
`\\ ;
:��ay
I I I
i L I -.-I ._.1
1 .. 1 i i i i +
r r Hrt
(STREET STATIONS)
29+04.11 BEGONIA WAY
16+81.66 HEATH LANE _

INTERSECTION
19+03.00
BEGONIA= -Y
16+72.96

HEATH LANE
105

PROFILE SCALE
NDRIZ 1" = 40'
VERT: 1" = 4'
yNE
I z'3o'oD` y�
[19+63.04 DEFL
2'30'00'
184-72.04
18+91.22

22.5 BE/11
I
0 40 0 40 ED 1 N

GRAPHIC SCALE

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
• INSTALL 8' DIP (CLASS 150) AND BEDDING
PER BCVWD STANDARD PLATE NO. 6 (36' MIN. COVER)
0 INSTALL TYPE JONES 3765 8'%4'X2.5'%2.5' BET BARREL FIFE HYDRANT ASSD8LY (CLASS -A RATED) PER BCVWD STANDARD PLATE NO. 1-1 O3 INSTALL8• MO X MJ ADAPTER RESTRAINED
QS INSTALL 8-%6'x8' FLANGED TEE
INSTALL 8' FLAMED GATE VALVE PER ECM) STMDARD PLATE ND. 2 0 INSTALL l' COPPER SERVICE LINE, TYPE K, PER BCV9D STANDARD PLATE NO. 6-2 AN) PLATE ND 12 ij CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN LINE INTERSECTION PER DETAIL 'A' ON MEET 1 It INSTALL BLUE REFLECTIVE FIRE HYDRANT PAVEMENT MARKERS PER DETAIL 'B' SHEET 1 1® INSTALL B' 45' BEND RESTRAIAED
14 INSTALL 8' 22.5' BEND RESTRAINED
PUNNING ■ O*B1ON ■ OONBTRUOTION
74 -DO COUNTRY CLUB DRAM. SURE 201
PALM 06898, CALFONBIA 92260-1855
76•-346-7484. FAX 750.346.6315• wwwADFcom
MI :AE SUTTON
DESIGN 05'
ORR
DRAIN IT:

JW
CHEMED BY:

MSS
SCALE:
1"= 40'
DATE
APRIL, 2008
GATE: NSA.

R.C.E. 5] 6]4 .� IS -31-2007 201006fi6

BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Riverside County, California
Approved BY.
.20 REICHENBEROER
District Engn..

WOE Na 18084
1,1(14

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA

WATER IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 51468-7

BEGONIA WAY
6TH. 1010000 TO STA 19.0300
LOCATED DIME NO 1/4 OF SEC 2, T 3 S. R 1 6, SBI
IN THE CITY CF IEMMMF, C LIF88IN
0 SE
SE
S
0 B-
SE
-0
SHEET a
6 OF $ SHEETS

DRAWING NAME,

0. Pardee Homes
FILE 40.1

i i 1
-1--'i t !_ 1,-.1--6•
,�
©Qom
1000.00

ACANTHUS LANE
20+63.14

YARROW LANE
(STREET STATIONS)
10+00.00 ACANTHUS LANE
= 20+63.58 YARROW LANE --

PL INTERSECTION

THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL

NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR/OR LIABLE FOR

UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE
PLANS. ALL CHANCES TO THE PLANS MUST BE

IN WRITING ANO MUST BE APPROVED BY THE
PREPARER OF THESE PLANS.

THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SIGNING THESE PLANS IS

RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THE ACCURACY AND
ACCEPTABIUTY OF THE DESIGN HEREON. IN THE

EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES ARISING AFTER COUNTY
APPROVAL OR DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE

PRIVATE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

FOR DETERMINING AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AND

REVISING THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY THE
COUNTY.

I- _.._I._.
_
1 ) _
I II
L.a 1 4.4
�I
.IO�IJ4TS1 i
1-.�_ T i__I I � � � 2[i2.B1_ILF' -� .{ _.l I i •-._� _. --._{-. .I. .. I '.. -j • - ...
10 YARROW LANE
SEE SHEET 3
NOTE:

ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON
ARE TRUNCATED. ADD 2000' TO

THE ELEVATIONS TO OBTAIN THE

ACTUAL ELEVATIONS
NOTE

WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A
GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

NOTE

SEE SEPARATE PLANS FOR

SEWER & STORM DRAIN
SYSTEMS.
11 12 13
ACANTHUS. LANE

WATER DATA
O

DELTA/BRG
RADIUS
LENGTH

TANGENT
1 KO' i21.2'FA
-
52;
-
2 Cs 1 119
3 .6 08 `1'08"
7391.00 .00'
105.58
¢1_
4 NOO'32 42 E
--
204.775

5 N22'. 17.18'/)
-

81.10 -
6 NQ 41 50°0
-

17.97'
-
7 N23'24' 26'E
-
167.03'
-
6 H7.3.43' 213"E
-

18.00'
-
1219 T
DIAL10MMIE
1(800) 227-2600
At &4� mR Dry,
ois
@IDR00elIDRVICOAISSOPeOVISONn..lsw,
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

BASED ON THE LINE BETWEEN STATIONS
'TRAK" AND 'M47H' (POSITIONS PER
NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY, NA063,
EPOCH 1995.5) AS SHOWN ON M.B. 102,
PAGES 50 101 0151 65 OF RECORDS IN

COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE OF
RIVERSIDE cowry, CALIFORNIA
N 52'49'02.84" E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUMONT
NO, 07.A.82
1-3/8' BRASS CAP MGAAENT MARKED
'CITY B.M. 7'. LOCATED AT THE S.E.

CORNER 14711 AND PEMISYLVANIA AVE.,
59 F7. S'LY AND 22 FT. E'LY OF
CENIER-IRE INTERSECTION, 2 FT. S'LY OF
OF B.C.R.

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982)
87 I{P,.i CLASS 150
14 15
40 0 40 80 120

GRAPHIC SCALE
12+99.81 a' 01E'1
1ING 8" SS
Ci 79 ; 77
TRACT 3168-7
0 15049$' 4 ,.
2" ARE �P
To
72 (STREET STATIONS)
12+82.97 ACANTHUS LANE
_ 12+37.28 VERONICA COURT
'4 INTERSECTION

CONSULTING
B
MAR
OESCRIPRdB
APPR.

OA

ENGINEER

REVISIONS
CITY
R/W
75 73 1 /4
l
122.6 sage I
TRACT 31468-7
I
.L
f
{-
I t _i
1 I I !' 1 -. F .- I 1
i i,
' 1 .. 1-1-0"1 I ,�J .
(STREET STATIONS)
10+00.00 JONQUIL LANE
- 22 .05 BEGUN A WAY
E. INTERSECTION

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
0 INSTALL 8' DIP (CLASS 150) BAC1RILL AND BEDDING
PER DCVWD STANDARD PLATE 10. 6 (36' MIN. COVER)
Q2 INSTALL TYPE JCES 3765 6'54'12.5'52.5' NET BAWREL FIRE HYDRANT ASSD,BLY (CLASS -A RAID) PER EX.VND STANDARD PLATE ND. 1-1 0 INSTALL 8" FLG X ML ADAPTER RESTRAINED
0 INSTALL 2' AIR AND VAClA1M RELEASE VALVE ASSDOLY PER BCVND STANDARD PLATE NO. 5
©5 INSTALL 8'88"X8' FLANGI) TEE
0 INSTALL 8' FLANGED GATE VALVE PER MID STADAM PLATE ID. 2 INSTALL 1' COPPER SERVICE LINT, TYPE X. PER BOAT° EDWARDd PLATE NO. 6-2 AND PLATE NO 12 10 11
12 ECthT]NG GRaDEI

O Q PIPE
j --1-'-••-1
j _1 •
1 665 61 BCP ._y 4. I- . 4-
fir--�
21;LF
7)0 NT§ I
r
2z3 -Lt ! T
D.I R CLASS -1504
12+23.00

JONQUIL LAM
30+34.62

JONQUIL LANE
BEGONIA WAY 111+58.00 8' WATER
SEE SHEET 6 xI1D Ex. 8' GAS
11+69.001 B' WATER
_ XING EX. 30" GAS __
(STREET STATIONS)
'I I 1+81.00 JONQUIL LANE
- 30+45.69 OAK VALLEY PORT
I l PL INTERSECTION
11 i l

PROFILE SCALE
HORIZ: 1" • 40'
VERT: 1" . 4'
DEFT.
1 I.

OAK VALLEY PARKWAY
690
680
670
18 CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN LIRE INTERSECTION PER DETAIL "A" ON SHEET 1 0 INSTALL BLUE REFLECTIVE FIRE HYDRANT PAYMENT WARNERS PER DETAIL 'B' SHEET 1 © CONSTRICT WATER MAIN LIRE INIuENlIION PER DETAIL 'D' ON SHEET I 14 INSTALL 8' 22.5' BEND RESTRAINED
i© INSTALL 8' DD CAP
19 INSTAL). 16' FLO X MJ ADAPTER RESTRAINED
. INSTALL 16'X16'58' FLANGED TEE
(3 INSTALL 16' FLAILED BUTTERFLY VALVE PER BCVIID STANDARD PLATE M. 2 PLANNING ■ DESIGN ■ GGNSTRUCTIGN
74-180 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. BUTS 201
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 82260-IMSS
760-346-7489 FAX 760.04&8315. wwPABP.coIB
MICHAEL S. SUTTON
BATS tl 1:460
R.C.E. 57867 • EAR. 12-31-2007
(LESION BY
MANN BY:
.AN
DECKED BY:
855
SCALE:
1'- 40'
DATE:

APRIL, 2006

JOB HALER
20100686

BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Riverside County, California

JG REICHENBERGER
016hbW Engineer
FLOE Ma 19034
Dame

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA

WATER IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 31488-7

ACANTHUS LANE AND JONQUIL LANE
ETA 7010000 TO ETA 15N4993 AND STA 161609010 STA 12.2306 LUCATED IN THE NI 1/4 6 SEC 2, T 3 3, R 1 W, BBI

IN INC CITY OF EEAWRIT, CALIFORNIA
OR:

Pardee Homes
S H E
OF 8 SHEETS

CRAWINB NAVE
FILE NO.:.
11/28/06 9:29 am
0 0
IN
S
Ti
TO
IN
i
z
E T
Sa

670
1_y
F
680
I
t -j r • L 7 } t
t
1 1.

I I 1
iT
—1— t
f
+-
1 1
I
li a.-i ` I I.8 roX11
660 I H � I_ -r
f 1 t
1 I
1 1- 4 4 {4 L_ L. I
f _ I
I , I i•
•__�.. j `. -4..
t_ .i 1
y I. I i`
— 1_ I a; I 1 1.
, ,1
1 I
_._ _1.- I P1 LF 1 14 -I r f
-1._ RE3TRAi
i I
1' r
- 383.813 LF4 1
10 ORCHIS LANE
SEE SHEET 5
(STREET STATIONS)
10+00.00 VENETIAN MALLOW CT
= 12+85,53 ORCHIS LANE

PL INTERSECTION
10+X1.00
VEIETIAN MALL011 CT
12+83.41

ORCHIS LANE

THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL

NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR/OR LIABLE FOR

UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE
PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE

IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE
PREPARER OF THESE PLANS.
11 44
P-¥ -150a
12 VENETIAN MALLOW COURT
�I --- 0F17,0Q I8" 88100
I XING 8 SS

THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SIGNING THESE PLANS IS

RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THE ACCURACY AND
ACCEPTABIUTY OF THE DESIGN HEREON. IN THE
EVENT OF OiSCREPANCIES ARISING AFTER COUNTY

APPROVAL OR DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE

PRIVATE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

FOR DETERMINING AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AND

REVISING THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY THE
COUNTY.

NOTE:

ALT. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON
ARE TRUNCATED. ADD 2000' TO

THE ELEVATIONS TO OBTAIN THE

ACTUAL ELEVATIONS
43 PROP. 8'
32 NOTE

WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A
GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

NOTE:

SEE SEPARATE PLANS FOR

SEWER & STORM DRAIN
SYSTEMS.

TRACT 31468-7
®42 '
Ss
I 41
33 DIG '4' T

DIAL TOLL FRED
1(800) 227-2600
odgbs
BefoteYa0D4 D.+,
OCEDOK NDORV89A121TM OURUMWc•,MOVA
OASIS OF BEARINGS:

BASED ON THE LINE BEDEW STATIONS
"MAX" AAD 'MAIN' (POSITIONS PER
NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY, NA083,
ETCH 1995.5) AS SNOWN ON M.B. 102,
PALES 50 1510!X)1 65 OF RECORDS IN

COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE OF

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
N 52'49'02.84" E
BENCHMARK; CITY OF BEAUMONT
NO. 07.A.82
1-J/B" BRASS CAP MOMENT WIRKED
"CITY B,M, 7'. LOCATED AT RE S.E.

CORNER 14TH AND PENNSYLVANIA AVE..
59 FT. S'LY AND 22 FT. E'LY OF
CFMERLTAE INTERSECTION, 2 FT. S'LY RT
OF B.C.R.

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982)
R+
40 F-
DE5CRIP11+8
37 ENGINEER

REVISIONS
Ott
yFINI
-r h _.I _
)jI I
11 I I
1 y
Y$; . L I o0
1 ; 1 1 Q.'µP�mfN Li }
t - - L I 1 `jy 1 `:.

I I Cl Zz
I t - - 4. ; 1 -! I-
1 f t
-1
i 1 -- - A --r. . F.. .
1 f ; I
I
, i- I I. , i) I
: f
L

SERVICE
2" X REDUCER
2" AVR
dt
8 r--'
N '1
4 1 10480.00 '
8 END CAP
2' AVR it
8 ■ ■ •

CONSULTING
13 10
11 12
1__ _L -i

1. 1_I 4 ..
- --I F
-� • H
26�42

VERONICA COURT
TRACT 31468-7
0 11 0
80 —;a l r --Y1 T9 :---------
aTl
84 73
PROP. 8
SEIIER
I N
85 8T Q
7 WATER DATA

DELTA/BRG RADIUS -LENGTH TANGENT
N89 27'18`W
141.30'
155.81'

86.76'
N" 30'80'51'
289.00'

73.73'
3 868:'36.'27'6
4 1 N89'27'18'8
260.42'
,
40 (STREET STATIONS)

2.37.28 VERONICA COURT
12+82`57 ACANTHUS LANE
@ INTERSECTION

12.60.42 VERONICA COURT
12482.81

AGVIIFUS LANE
•
i j t-+ i
i
i-
1 Li '

GRAPHIC SCALE
©E100
RROFII F 04+61 F.

HORIZ 1' 40'
VERT: 1' = 4'
HO

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
V INSTALL 8" DIP (CLASS 150) SACKFUL MD BEDDING
PER WAD STANDARD PLATE ND. 6 (36' MIN. COVQR)
0 INSTALL TYPE JONES 3765 6'04'X2.5"X2.5" NET BARREL FIRE 1N08M7T ASSEABLY (I A55 -A RATED) PER ECM STANDARD RATE N0. 1-1 Q INSTALL e' FLG X 141 ADAPTER RESTRAINED
0 INSTALL 2 AIR AND VACUUM RELEASE VALVE ASSELOY PER BCVBD STANDARD PLATE N0. 5
Q5 INSTALL 8"08"X8" FLANGED TEE
© INSTAL 8' PLAIDED BATE VALVE PER EDVND STANDARD PLATE N0. 2 (:) INSTALL 1' COPPER SERVICE LINE, TYPE K, PER BCV8D STANDARD PLATE N0. 6-2 AND PLATE NO 12 1D CONSTRUCT 8ATER MAIN LINE INTERSECTION PER DETAIL 'A' ON SHEET 1 11 INSTALL BLUE REFLECTIVE FIRE HYDRANT PAVEMENT MARKERS PER DETAIL 'B' SHEET 1 1© INSTAL 8" ETE CAP
INSTAL 8'706' REDUCER
120
PLANNING ■ 0691011 • 'CONSTRUCTION
74-10 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUR8 201
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-853
760-346-748M FAX 760.0464015. ,,591808,o0
V1CHA TTON
001+: CG

11.8E 576 ' . 2-31-2007
DESIGN 8Y:
510+1+4 BY:

JW
CfEOED BY:

MSS
0100 F•
1"-• 40'
DATE:

APRIL, 2006
.me MISER
20100666

BEAUMONT CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Riverside County, California
fattkei

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA

WATER IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 31488-7

VENETIAN MALLOW CT AND VERONICA CT
FOR:
8TA 10.0090 TO 8TA 18.91166 AND BTA 886000 7012.6042
LOCATED IN 118 IN 6/4 OF 601 2, T 3 5, R 1 W. 591
IN 118 CITY Cr BEMIKN6, CALIFORNIA
Pardee Homes
ROVE\WATER\666DW708.DWG MIGUELLOPEZ 11/28/06 9.30 am
SHEET
8 OF E SHEETS -
DRAWING NNE:

FILE 110:

CherryVsfley

YINELAND ST
fNWSNEO RFACE. ...„..FS

ICON PONT JHP
INTERSTATE 10
Beaumont
LEGEND
FLOAHRtF._....._.._.._....F1
LOW PONT ..............:.LP

FRONERIY LINE
RICHT Or WAY............RAY
GTAPB FACE.._ _Cr
EDGE CF PAKYFNI.. FF
f61191ED GRADE_ .FG
LOCAL OFPRESSIOAL..._.....O

LOSING ELEVATION
FINISHED EIEVA110V

PROPERTY LINE
0NERUNE
MWNT-OF WIT (R/n)

EMI WATER LNFE
EL7SF. BLOC/ MU

EMU GAS LIRE
EAST. WECTMCAL LIRE (IDLSON)

EASEMENT LINE
NATURAL OROONT- ....,.NO
PORTLAND Q9IENT CONCRETE .ACC
ASAHALT CONORETE__.._.......__HC

CONCRETE MAC
ORKETHHY __ _ ...:_.DWF
WATER ME7EIP„,._....__...... _.NM
TELEPHONE BOX_ GTE
WATER VALE£. ....... _.___»...._WV
VAor. r.........__.._,..........,_ _KT
POAER POLE... PP
AGGREGATE BASE................_AB
TOG'S? , (70050)
+701.50
- �
CONSTRUCTION contractor agrees thot NH oaardanee with generally accepted cnnsfnrctlon pot construction contractor ell be required to assume tole and complete responsbillty for jab site caneFtione during the cewse of construction of the project, luarding safety of ad persons and preperlg Mot BIM fequinmant shall be made to apply centkomssfy o# not be IhlRed to normal working howl and constructla n contractor AuHher agrree& to defaa4 IndemnIfy and hold designprofessional harmkss from any mid oR llabWtjc real or alleged, 14 oonnsellon with the perfomanee of work on this project, mn:epting Bohny arithlg tool the sole negligence of design professional.

UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES & USE£ fie engineer prepormg these plans '.5 not be respons&le fo . or Fable for. unoutherMed charges to or arms of Mete pleas AN changes to the plans must be k ertONg & must be appeared by the papaw of these plans.

LEGENQ;

ASSEMBLY ASSY

BEGNNC OF CURB BC
CENTERLINE ..._...._ : CL

CURB & GUTTER CAN
CLEAN OUR -_....._._.._ _. CO
DRY BARREL 09
DUCTILE IRON PIPE ...... OP

ENO OF CURS - EC
FIRE HYDRANT .. fN
.FLOWLJWE ` Ft.

CATE VALVE CV
INVERT !NV
LATERAL .._._: .. LAT
STATION _.-..._ STA
TOP OF CURB._ To

PROPOSED PRCP
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT...PUE

TOP OF MANHOLE TMH

VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE VCP
POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE..PVC
CONTAINED INTTVN2 MESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AN
ENCYtOACNMENT PERMIT AND/OR A
GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.
st FRIATE EMBER S1ait0 NW BANS IS
Ammar Fa, ASSUARE O[ .arao Cr.w9
ALL1F41MTfY OF DC OfSION REAM W Rio'
We of HYARAYVL'YS Name AFAR CRY
APIYYmL OR RANO WOIAOCROIL RE
maw DOWLR LISLE BE RE,OteeSE ran
OEBBDRee sACCERABE ER/FODR AND
weave DE PINE ra APPRIAED err DIE an
DIET
CAL. TOLL WIRE
1(600) 221-2600
esTroilla it a7
E(BaS OOLNoa911eeAOOOPI OMONOMMA
PROP. 8' SEWER /ANN
PROP. 8' WATER PAIN - RB -
1' WATER SERNCE ... a
4" SEWER LATERAL
TEE KITH 3 -VALVES

BLOWOFF ASSEMBLY

BEND (SHOW SZE & DEFLECTION) -

WATER VALVE (GATE OR BUTTERFLY)

SEWER MANHOLE

PLAN OUT
HAa
O

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CAUFORNIA
Sewer Improvement Plans
TRACT 31468-7
LOCATED WITHIN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, T 8 S, R T W, SBM

IN THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CAUFORNIA
TRACT 31468-5

INDEX MAP
MO Y" ROD'
1 r `ti rs'
p_14
f --r 7m,
S OYE5R A
.1. GRACE
RAE
EL
Ios
8' NLAVAL DEPTH
-y9�Mf.�� ��t►�sfR�9M�
POINSETTIA WAY. YARROW W, HEATH BEGONIA WAY
ACANTHUS LN. VERONICA CT, VENETIAN MALLOW CT, (A011S LN

NOT TO SCALE

INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET
agsCRIPTION
.

TITLE SHEET

SEWER IMPROVEMENT PLANS
2-9
200 0 7 0 409 GOO
BASIS OF-BEAR0NlI&
L'FSrRPIM

BASED ON TIE LINE BETEEN STATIONS
ARAN' AAD 'YNGTH' (PETTieS PER
I MTIOIML GEODETIC ERVEY. ANON.

EPOCH 5995.5) AS SNOW ON Y.B. 102,
PAGES 50 TNROATl 65 OF AM= IN
00u5EY RECOVER S TWICE WE
RIVERSIDE COWLY. GLIFANIA
BE+NG: N 52'49'02.54" E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUMONT
OdYRP1R . NO. 07.A.82
1-3/B' maw OAP NovAE IT 1IAl9120
'CITY e.Y. 7'. LOCATE° AT THE S.E.

OO19ER 1411 IAD PORIDLVANIA
5e FT. STY AML) 22 IT. E'LT QF
64NHEM.UE INTERSECTILN4. 2 FT. S'LV 0
OF B.C.R.

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982)
NOTE:

TRENCHING FOR LRTRRTIES"AND
STRUCTURES 6 NOT ALLOWED..

UNRL SOL COMPACTION REPORT
rs IRIBAETTR97 TO AND APPROVED

BY THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT.

BY
MARK
OLSYJwr1al
MFR.

DATE
IMOWN.

REVISIONS ,hl
,. ..DIY •N

CONSULTING
'A
age nr.

R ,

SHAM BE METALLED MIND
DOTRSIRFAM CO HOUSE =man

FOR THE FOLLDNRAS LOT&
SATE 3
BHT 4
MR 5
EHT s
62 47
69 44
63 53
71 126
95 54
72 132
96 66
76 97
112
98 101
NOTE
NSW construction to be plod until
sew' system is approved for service
Rug to be removed ST presence of
Public Woks Inspector.
25'-28'
FG 0 H/9
I"
LAT. INN
0 R/e
18'
S --Air AP
SD
4'
5'
45'
8'PVC SEWER

SEWER LATERAL - TYPE 'A'
NTS

SEWER LATERAL - TYPE 'B'
WITS
"WYE -STATION O MAIN
SEWER LATERAL. CAL.LCUT
LAT. INVERT O.R/R

CONSTRUCTION NOTE REFERENCE
TYRCiAL OBER !ATAW.CNJAUIf
PLONNINa ■ Inman ■ CaNUYRUOT=N
7470 CONSIST cue OWE. 81TITe E01
PALM OEBERG CMTFOR NA (72661856
7(0,1167411 .. FAX 740946835 • wwARBFAom.

LFSI
CRAI N St
0610 FFI
BY
et MOO)
MSS
WALE.

RAT OMB
01111%700)
•
AIR
20107668

B'PYC SEWER

SEWER NOTES

1. SEWER CONSTRUCTION AND MWERINS SNAIL BEE ACCORDANCE WITH THE CRY OF BETWIONFS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.2. GRAVITY SEWER PROFRE ELA'A1DNS ARE TO BE FLOW MMES (CONOHAT INVERTS). 3 MANHOLES SHAM BE CONSTRUCTED IN MICE WITH CRTD STD 606. SEWER WINS MAY BE LAO THROUGH THE MANHOLESANDUSED AS A FORM FOR THE INVERT: OAST WON SHW.LBE USED FORT0 COVERS

4. PRIOR ro 00 1 OF SEWER, COMPACTOR SHALL IMPOSE DOSING SEINER AND VERIFY ITS 8051910 ELEVATION. WHERE CONNECTION TO D05TDIG TM/MOLES AND INLET 51118 Cf PROPER SIZE DoS 5, NO ALTERATIONS SHALL BE MADE TO 8WING0 MANHOLE BASE OR STUB EXCEPT AS SPEC4ICALY AUTHORIZED HY. THE CRY OF BEAUMONT.

B. MOIRE A NEW INLET MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN NA EOSTNG MANHOLE, TEE ELEVATION OF THE

INLET SHALL BE SUCH THAT ITS CROWN SHALL BE LEVELED WITH THE CROWN OF THE OUTLET PIPE. AT THOR PROJECTIONS TO THE WAMERS IENTERMIE

THE CONTRACTOR IS AWNED THAT THE WORK ON THIS PROJECT MAY INVOLVE WORDS IN THE H IRCSPAE. C NTRACADMINS TRA WT1 OBEERESPONSIBLE FOR 'CONFINED MR SPACE' ARTICLE

7. ALL SEWER INLETS AT TIE MANHOLE SHAD. BE SUCH THAT ITS CROWN SHAT BE LEVEL 1ATH ME CROWN OF TIE OWLET PPE. AT THHER PRDIM1UOTIS TO THE MAlOES CENTERLDIE

6. ALL STORM DRAINS, CATCH RAINS, AND STORK WATER RUNOFF STRUCRfRES MARL BE PROVIDE) um ADEQUATE CAPAISIUTIES 10 FILTER AND RETAIN SEDIMENT ED GRIT, OE AND GREASE. TO PREVENT POLLUTION IN STORM WATER RUNOFF IN COMPUANCE WITH THE CITY. OP. BEAUMONIS BEST HAMMEN! PRACTICES AND I(I THE BEAUMONT ORAD E MASTER PLAN FOR STORM WATER AS 5W. AS BEST MAIA OIENT-PRACICES IOENRFIE4 IN THE CIRRENT REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY PEEWEES.

9. PROVIDE BACKFI.OW PREVENRON DEVICES WHERE UPSTREAM RANH= REM IS HIGHER TITAN PAD ELEVATION. - -

10. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE MAISffii0 TAPE AT TOP OF PIPE CENTERLINE ON TOP OF PIPE BEDDING.

T1. SEWER LATERAL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE MRH RCJ.0 STANDARD 600. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR DETAILED ON PLATS ..

12. THE CALCULATED 'D IN THE PROFILE B M DEPTH OF SEWER MANHOLE, (0 -RNA --LOWEST .AVERT.)

13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL HAVE � .S ENG RRD NMI OBSERVE TRITICHI HO.

BACKINUUNG. AND Y ROAD
ROHE OF W Y.. TWO SETSS COMPACTION REPORTS CERTWYDND THAT WORKS DOMPACRON OF ALL UTILITY TRENCHES MOM AU. EASIMETTS O EE IN CONFORMANCE 10 SOINDA DS AND (NOOTECA SEld. REPORT SHALL BE SUBLOTTED AFTER EACH 1 triany IS COMPLEIED Ate CERTIRED. COMPACTION FEPORT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPT. OF WORKS AT LEAST TWO MORENO GAYS 8ETDPE AGGREGATE DAlE ISAGGREMTE ESE IMERNS ARE PIAdsR DNSITE. -

14. DEVELOPER SHALL EIE FULLY RESPONSIBLE IN ASSURING THAT PROPOSED 8/PROVEN/ITS CONFORM TO THE APPROVED PUNS. SPECIFICATIONS AND CITY OF BEAUMONT STANDARDS. WHERE DEMONS EXIST. DEVELOPER SHALL PROPOSE CORRECTIVE VASURES FOR RENEW MID APPROVAL SY THE Cu?.

PRIVATE ENGINEERS NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS}
I. TIE Df151ENCE MND. LO0A1E54 Of ANY UNDERGROUND WINES OR 51RIJC1iiRE3 SH0214 ON THESE PLANS ARE OSTAED BY A SEARCH Of AVAILABLE RECORDS. TO THE BST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE WERE ARE N0 CO5TW40 WU/TIES EXCEPT THOSE SHOWN ON THESE PUNS.. THE CONTRACTOR S IEQUiRED TO TAKE ALL PREGIUBONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE. UIRTDES

SHOWN, AND ANY OTHER USES OR STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN ON THESE AN D D IS
REQUIRED FOR THE PROTECTION CF. AND ANY DAMISE TO THESE IJNES OR STRUCTURES.

2. R SHILL -BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPOE ILTIY TO NOTIFY TIE OWNER OF ALL UTLBIES OR STRUCTURES CONCERNED BEFORE maw WORK. - -

3. QUANNRNES 514041 HEREON ARE PRCNICFD FCR BODING P'JRPO ES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL UWE RESPONSIBLE FOR VE]FYDIG AU. OLNNRRES PRIOR TO BOODO FOR CONSTRUCTION.

4. THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SIGFRIG THESE PLANS IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THE ACCURAL.r AND ACCEPTABILITY OF THE DESIGN HEREON. IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES ARISING AFTER CITY APPROVAL OR OWING CONSTRUCTION, THE PRIVATE ENGINEER STHALL BE RESPOHSIBI.E FOR DEERE/EN AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AND REVISING THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY.

DECLARATION OF .ENGINEER OF RECORD
I ANEW DECLARE THAT ti YY PROFESS:ONN. OPINION. NNE DESIGN OF THE INPRWF.14RMS AS SHOWN 91 PRACTICES. NN THESE ECOMPLiES WITH THE CURRENT ENGINEERIN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE THE STANDARDSAL ENGINEERDIC

DESIGN OF THESE
REPRO/EMIRS. IRS. I ACCEPT FULT. RESPUNSIBIUTY' FOR SUCH DESIGN. I UNDERSTAND AND

ANCHOR EDGE THAT THE PUN CHEER OFTHESEPLANS BY THE CRY OF BEAUMONT IS A REIIEW

FOR THE LINED PURPOSE OF OMEN THAT THESE PLANS COMPLY WITH CITY PROCEDURES AND OTHER APPUOABLE CODES AD ORDINANCES. THE PLAN RENEW PROCESS IS NOT A DEIERMNATON OF THE 15559KIN. ATEQUACY OF THE BIPROVEAIEMS. SUCH PLAN. CHOCK DOES NOT THEREFORE REUSE 1N OF MY DESIGN RESPONSIBLJTY..

AS TIE ENGINEER OF RECORD, I AGREE TD DEFOE_AD INDEMNIFY THE CITY OF BEANTONTI ITS AND MI. UABIUTY. CLAMS, DAMAGES, OR
INJURES TO ANY PERSON OR PROPERTY ARISING FROM NEGLIGENT ACTS. ERRORS OR OMISSIONS OF THE ENGINEER OF RpcpRD, HIS EMPLOTEESS. HIS AGENTS OR NS "CONSULTANTS. --

SIGNEURE SON

LICENSE
39LC7
DATE AL1HN167
EXP 11 T:t!t]'i
CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND ESTIMATES OF t1UANT7TNES
Qt RNSTAU. V PVC sum MAIN - - 4.210 IF
Q INSTALL 4' BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE
(AYERIOMI FIMMENT'S NG3-A UT EMAIL) -
O BITIsl 4" PLC SEER IATERAl.

POT 0110 STD. 600 (TM.)
Q INSTALL 4' RECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE WITH
CAST IRON MOLE COVER PER MD SID. 600-
0 REMOVE DUSTING S' PLUG AID JOIN EXISTING B' PVC SEWER Jf1'0 E. AN Spar
19 FA.
112 EA.
20 EA.
2a.

SHEET
1 B SHEETS
2 g
2 f
DROWN ASE: /_,
LOCATED MIMI 111E TI OF Sane t. i 35. 8 15. 4065$701 0 - - B IRE GIY ai 101.1011, &UMW6A - 4.

A

51 26+39.41 LOIN Lx.ei% SEER
10153.00. 6.0'RT. POINSETTIA WAY
FS 669.21
666

48.00 LE
8 PVC
SEYJEfa L
....8.,„
�6
26 1 13OT0 L.F'
> 5TR11cT. 8'Pvc-SERER'--
27 POINSETTIA WAY
71051 FLOWER DR
SEE TRPNCT 81488.6 MAJORS
Q 1 25466.41 lc MIN 617 twase3)
10113.00. 8.0.RT. PONEEITIA SAY
•15104.75, 13.0'LT. TIER FUSER
3 666 3!
(susET STRUMS; --

10.00.00 POINSETTIA 441'
=14498.75 TIGER 7120601 OR
1: TNT; F5 669.30
4 psi• %.

WORK CONTAINED N0TMN 7NESE PLANS
SNAI.c N07 CONiME1VE{ OHM AN
ENCROACN0EN7 PERMIT AND/OR A
GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN I5F0E0.
mT A1511101 DAWN 50006 DM ALMSa
RSSfOSMI E 7515 ASSf1A1C tort AMMO' Ak9
AcorPro 1070E 1116 WIN'150:0 of De
ELoir OF AmCR61 AAM 115005 04181 O5Y
/MAW -OR SSVS 6553055051151
7RLA1E6150531WL 6F MINV565C 1744
66100555.45 A665556 015400 No
4420 7 RIf 44455 FCR 5R4B01a-O A' 0Y ant

LOT NYER
19 L;672) ,E=akWT=
;big
CUM k SJFIER
40 4 1

SNARL IC SCALE

YARROW LANE

SEE RIGHT HEREON
670
660 -
27 28
29 30
31 {STREET STATIONS)
11+72.00 POINSETTIA SAY
=18462.751 YARROW LANE
111; Fs 610.3e
9,

51.54.41 w ft 4
18468. 79, 4.0'LT, TAN7OW LANE O
_,,.11+7! 100_..0_ Li0116ERU TAY
DI
CAN. TOLL. FREE,
TON 227-2600
oe Des
W11aA Vat 00

BASIS OF BEARING&
tiscpPror
ELMO/ 116 LIRE maim srArl55
8WC AAD 'INTIP- ( S_T1TOIS PER
NATIOL4. GEODETIC 55111645E Na98i.
1I10GN 1995.5) AS sou ON KO. 102.

PAM 50 TLR111196 65 4F RECORDS 16
MOOT FE09LOER'S OFFICE OF
RIVERSIDE cakaY NUFT1911A,
BEING: N 52'49'02.84" E
BENCHMARK CITY OF BEALLIoNT
5C1dPrl0R: NO. 07.A.82
r-3/8' sass ow LaU54T me=
'01TY 8.M. 7'. LOCATED AT 7EE S.E.
0091FR 447H AA0 F8VO5)LVANIA AVE.,
59 FT. S'LY ANT 22 FT. E'LY CF
C#HTEROE INTERSECTION. 2 FT. s'LY
OF B.C.R.

ELEV... 2678.277 (1982)
UM%
14EV4810
6 650
22 ?72•

YARAOWIANE

SEE LEFT HEREON
19a:vi tF
CONSTRUCT 8 PVC SERER

YARROW LANE
(STREET STATIONS)
20463.58 YARROW 131
=10100.00 AWNS LN
INF; FS 668:82
21 I
a <671

ACANTHUS NE
SEE 8YEI Ts
i
I
tt
'•ER
6" 041 0101701

PVC SERER
r2P55.35 if IN 12
20469.58, 6.0' LT YAMS U4
16 .96. 6.0 RT MINFRE LN
4 ^� 001 Rife
PAD ElEV.
9r J
t67t1 92 I

SEWER DATA
?tlt.:.M
golETAI!?►iF M[iLl/11_+11-1-
1151-:_=ZLi
it.m Z.NNIfY+lTSESof1�l[
nimiEVE
6Ii
IM713-111110E
11 =11
Md.- ::El .,1i-ii,99M1
KM 1186
••.ii3i1
7imlroa
:1•
ELM M^Si.}i'.yEi-:][!53is17.=.1SI<-Eala
�.-' '.�
ESlE TEN,
MIL_.a 1•® 711E
-
MAN.

ING ■ 056;55 • CONCTOI,CTION
14430 COINIHY Cum OFOVE BORE 301
P1LA CE(ERT. CAOF0RNA 5t0ab1N6
7603467481 . FAX 7!0345!755 • wm61BF51n
agc PA$ 75
DAre oriN OP.

BCE y0. 5744• 12-5+17
DR
ERR
tee:

CFO
0431,021 Br
16S
SINE

1.. 10'
EL01 DATE
01/11/2007
AM
20100566
repo
660
32 CONSTRUCTION NOTES
p usr4L0 W' PVC SERER 4516.
iTt � ai1 O SM. 60D.. uTFRAL. 13 EA
© INSTALL 4'. PM= METE 110010. 111111111I1
CAST 1806 WA1FIWE W EE PER CR10 STD. 608. - - - 3 EA
p MO= EX. 111.08 ALA JOIN pt. 8' PVC sae. - - - 1 EA
eft
31485.91 I IN N - 4
22498.98, 6.0'LT, YAIdm6 LNQ
.10466.23, 6.0'RT;. FEATS LN
95 r yp;
(STREET STATCO6)

22.92.75 YARROW LN
=10`00.00 WAN IN
6 11ar
94 RUIM11013N d•I.N DalaciAig qur
Da -111,4?
MAN
ANpowd

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CAUFORNIA

SEWER IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 814684

POINSETTIA WAY

YARROW LANE
sag 4544141 T07R161R1 5 Mk 1846441 TOWN1691
LOG= 15 4E M OA Site . T SLR -19.M
IN 146 CITY Of 9FNLQR. CILO6INIA
all' 01 Bowmen; R.t8C Walks D5paitme k • 500 E. 641 ST6117, EngbeerIng OA46105 .7.051176185.70 i 701.

Pardee Hornet
537 LF
1/11 M7 7:51' am
a
6 0
SHEETS
2 pioril F• CrAI9'
KM* r- 40'
LSRII f' • 4*
hagg
MOM CONTAINED WIPER MHES"E PLANS

SHALL NOT COMMENCE INERT AN

ENCROACFWENT PEBMRT AND/OR A
- GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED
NE MINE 083831 SNOW 1785E RAW Is
Ramseur WI ASCCfl117 inEAC:n0wRA1s
ACCEPTASUIT OF 178 *7 644 WWK a 07E
Doff OF OSCREDN0ES A5647 WW1 COY
M1r0NLL OR 01910 CG16(6IC00N AE
Maw SVOINE R BNUL AE R SFWEdRE FOR
=IMAM AN ACCEPTABLE =NON M60
NOM 96 PUNS FOR APPA81E087O4 CD:
295.� LF
378.51 LF
(Stmt. 1 STATIONS) -
93 22492-75 0 FEAYA14tT09 tN
•10.00.0 IN
Cs6� 2 1 INT
94 97
-�a
4G 40 80 120
GRAPNI0 SCALE
CONSTRUCT; B. PVC SEWER
32 33
98 131+85.81 I9 W 3 4
7288.88. 8.01.T, 1718218 LIE.'
-104C8.23. 8.0 RT. }UM Le
6b
S�6ti9.
99 98
34 35
;,ar..•. O7NSTRUCT'&'P1PL SEVER
38 HEATH LANE
ii34488.28]EW0.1 4
63 13.03.99. 5.01T. EC ,EAT UP

SEWER DATA
N]LS4PtLTA: .CillUMil.AUP.IutJf?. :Li
- REIWEt
1 List IFWx.0/011—�ti7[i718�SYITAi
•111111E36-11 ME !•11 Srl-f. R.)111 W Allli 14,18118
Li 11111 ®9'- W --'1q,
IIMIliAill l
DI ►i' T

DIAL TOLL FREE
1(800) 227,2800
Pa tionTro *1ulchaDow
9150900991 err*E49917449 901199194u9aM

BASIS OF BEARING

DOCAPROIA
BASED 05 DE LIFE BETWEEN STATIONS
'TRAIN' NO :2311' (POS:7196 PER
NATIONAL GEODETIC SLRIFY. 111067.

E+O-N 1995.5) AS 3&AIN ON 4.8. TO2.

PAGES SO DOMES OF =O EN IN
001MY-RECQtGR'S 0}FIC
RIIET6ILE COWRY, C4LIFORWIA,
BEING: N 52'49'02.84" E
BENCHMARK CITY Cr BEAUAONT
OF509PTOM NO. 07.A.82
!WA' 95195W It7AAENT 14Ut10D
'CITY B.Y. f. LOCATED AT DE S.E.

OMB 7412 NW PENSYLVANIA
59 FT. SLTAID22FT. E•LYOF
COMM IN£R>1:CTI0V, 2 FT. S7.Y Oc�
OF B.C.R.

ELEv.- 2678.277 (1982)
OY
9 a•01x801
OFitlOP' 9
'REVISIONS
DATE
an
■ ■ ■

CONSULTING
9-
:t
0'
111
—G' CURB 4 NUTTER
;,675.:12, •'S77.�
\LOT 159035
NCI ELEV.
37 •LANN,NO 9 9199091 U CONnSSmON

74.78 MIAOW =soave, SURE 971
FAIN DESERT. CALFORNA II 8.1610
7403467401 • FAX 70034496 • wrd6FA4m
- rta9 c' t 5
1Ai8 Ot1481t47/
FIE NO. 37887 LW. 11-31-07

OWED RD
SCALE

1., 4.

PLOT Alit-:
01/11/2007
..01 MEER
1010x,55
39 664

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
0 IISTML r P05 suet BEN. 674 LT.

O INSTALL 4' ROSIN PREVENTION COME
(Airittc t FO K SY•S 9483-A CR E0112.). 7
PER CR10 46787.017
ID 0� LATERAL.

Q 67U. 4• P ST mom veeec E WISH
0557 IRON YAIEVLE CIDER PER 000 SIB. 808. - - - - 2
O WIG= LOTS Rr7C71RI11B 5.405 FLOW DEVICE F'LW SUER.
-. (.I1Rt1 STATIONS)

16.91.84 NEAT LN
29404.II BEGONIA XY
INT
•10HA.00 ¢WS O

10.88.59.6.0' RT. }FATH W
.!9'08.53.5.0' L7. BBOI4IA ST
1 38
R
31 A
13 105
80 MdeN9Y BX
my of Beaus* RSYc II *$ Department 600 E. 619157471
MUM'. V,
Enoireetiv m em 57015/087-6570 • 4787DS7P-4 /DX
CITY OF BEAUMONT. CAUFORNIA

SEWER IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 31,4084

HEATH LANE
8Tk11.1 91TO7M5A8
LOWED DI 745IB.I/4 O NC 2. 7'31.' 81 3. SZ8I
III 11E LINK 0994988. 01181189
Pardee Homes
19 EA.

EA.

N
0 S
a
a
lb
N
s
I
SHEET I.

OF 8 SHEETS
.°48110"1..,

1c1>O 7L s0ALE
MALee 1'- 40'
ram 1" - 4'
680-
670
18 19

BEGONIA WAY
16 W 17
15+60.38.6.0 RT. ORO41S IN
-18494.00.6.0' LT, FARM WY
(STREET STATIONS)

20.00.00 BE6041A BY
=16+44.36 6Ra4IS LN
INT
124

SCNX CONTAINED MORN THESE PLANS
SHALL NOT C0VMA7L£ [WTK AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND/OR A
CRAWNC PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED.

P4' ANNE 0x0(0 SO•O mor RANT B
RESPa SIDLE FON mama TIE A:0184 ' 1140.
err 410 BE maw 14600 W ME
DOD at asoeset1CAS AIMS AFTER NM
APION41. 80 N2u1C COsosANRD4 TAE'
A•020 mom 04111 SE RESFONSCLE 147
aL1in11wia AY ACfiPTABIE SOruTON A10
M OND THE AVM FOR APA1204F0 Br ➢AE.CAV
143
.as.o
8E6 ofeert,
46 gy:
120
46 0 f
0r1A1i11C SCONE
1r
1 119
;685>
0 119404.Bo I8 w 18
22467.64.6.0' BEGONFAVY
it
118
48 117
49 3
4 arca44 144
9+-I

SEWER DAT
RADIus LE8101 TANGFM
zt
"- 230.71' - -
M
B- PVC
r-FINIBI S FFACE 0805
327.67 U'
15 CONSTRUCT 8'PVC SEW9ER,
14 (STREET ST/3106)
22+99.06 =MIA 80
10400.00 ,E011111.1/4
i INT: FS 68:+.]9
1s462.36 L1 w 4
23445.54, 8.0' 1.T. REAM GO
I$
oESI114 Ern
COI
.i1
53 s
13 iotsaBRD ENE1 F'B'f
ii
226.71 OF
CONSTRUCT 8"PVC SEWER
12 BEGONIA WAY
I.OT NAM
/^/---PAR F3EY.
113 / 112
x'685 i 5`-84.5`
•
�- i
11 110
Jil
�I o
7 ] 12110.71 19 its /5
88+78.13, 6.0'LT, 1339611A SAY
11 ctl
0 gI.
1 6' CURB i RITTER
I
1 1
T

OGIL TOLL FREE
1(800) 227-21300
"4 Woo 0.210*
uo••neEoi nce AI•RO 048111311aa0ow4
BASIS OF BEARINGS;
OESQ;iPTI,
OM w TIE WE BEE! GAMS
"MC AM 7Mm' (pOS1TNS 10 PER
4461 0L Ammo S[IT0EE►► 10/153,
MPOpN 1995,4 ASWOW di Y.9. 102.

PA6Es-50 NW,M1 65 OF REIXIK6 HN
mum AECOROFA'S 00010E 0f
RZYERS10E =NM CALIFORNIA
BEING: N 52'49'02.84' E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUNONT
orscRe1At NO. 07.A.82
PlAr BRASS CAP a01NAeu YYBaD
Cott B.Y. T. LAOIrm AT TIE S.E.
004600 74TH NO FEM611.204114 AVE..
59 FT. s'LrAID 22FT. Elf OF
=iMRE 1NTFRSECTION, 2 FT. S'cr AF
0T B.C.R.

ELEV.= 2678.277 (1982)
BY IAM11
AMR.

DATE
01121611

REVISIONS
cloy
_- ■ ■ •

CONSULTING
hoe
'L►00IHO • eaua2 • ee2N114YCT1eN
74+90 60601MTRY C1.UB DANE SIAME 201
PAIN 0{EEAT. 0.L000101 022004055
7440417441 • FAX 1600441015 • ....ARM=
Pagc tirgO5
BATE W111107
KB ND !VW PP. 4.041
MINN 911
0FAO'J61
MSS
SALE:
1'• 40'

PLOY WO
01/11/2007
JO OMR
2000666
11110X00 B1;
for Apparel
Amami
59 Cify of BeMm0X Pubic PVOrke DBpa+80er* 657 r. 60* sear BEAIAWI. C4 02223
Enaheeda 06421441 R'i.(F;1)A19-1240 . F..,25cp8 4420
10 690
I
670

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
V narou. r PVC SCPER 141Y. 812 IF.

DISTAL 4' atoms FIGAINTI04 MICE
(MERICIP1 FWLCY'S MISS -A 0R 0*WL). 8 FA.

Q PFRM. D SN B ST ' 25 EA.

Q 116TALL 4' MOST 0008TE16 WHOLE RIM
CST IRON W44A& 00400 PER 00Th SR). 606. - - - - 3 EA.

GMQATES LOTS FEOUMRIYB BALK FLT& MICE FOR SEER.
114 Via
146A too 8
1356
36+67.80
•10400.00 5 61115 O
16486.58. 8.0'86. IEA1H III
•49408.33, e.0'LT. Bf80N1A Br
(STREET STATIONS)

16.81.86 HEATH W
+29+04.11 Emma Tr.
5 INT

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
1BAOT 314138-7

BEGONIA WAY
SPk usisoe was a 8744 veto 19}38
1101100 IS SE IS 1/441P,TER 0.13 O, JI1 f, 804
0111S CITY OF SEISM 4400111114
SH
EET
4 GILL SHEETS
0218& 04E
14134
FI
Oft
Enna\ow\IMPROVEVEWEe\666SS7a.om; MIGUELLOPEi 1/+:/07 7:53 om I,
8 5
3-

wszta
WORN CONTAINED WHIN arm PLANS

SHALL NOT COMNENLE UNTIL AN
ENCiOAOIYENT PERM ANO/CR A
CRADI N0 AYR W T HAS BEEN ISSUED
RE ANNE 0.814 TN 9CmIC DEW PINS K
RESPONArE FAR ASSAYS ONE AO:WOFAN
A0:IPGISIIIY OF 0E tem IERMIN w NE
6TEN70F OLSOREVHO S IRM7 Mgt car
*MIA OR OUR41O CONE RCA6.Y. 9E
Miff ENGINEER 9NRL 6E 11666E NW
WEROW..6 AN ACXPRI .E SGW7.yN £0
/MM# Tie P5M5 FOR AMROI W Sr IN 0714.
29 30 31 32
33 34
89 671
(STPEEI5fAMS)- -
20463.58 YARROI LN
=10+00.08 ACANr}AS LN
(I INT: FS 668.62
.98

20449.66,6.0 LT YAWN LN
10476.96.1.0 RT =anus LN
40 AO 10 120

GRAPHIC SCALE

YARROW LANE
SEE SHEET 2
r-�LOT. 14A0ER
/ r-- PAD 0.EVI
2 '6�77.2j
8' 91TER:
• ON9 k d1TTER1
PATER IE1ER
_68
.:1 .8?

ACANTHUS LANE
87 (I76.61
6` ass I COTTER
69 70
C 8) rya
(STREET STAY:frZ)�
12482.9T ACANIHIS LN
12437.28 VERONICA CT
INT; FS 2873.85
VERONICA COURT 78
SEE SHEET a (-61.1)

SEWER DATA
CELTA
RADIUS

LEN ,TAN
GTH�BRG
ENT
REMARK
SO}
8"
3 OR21'TO 14'
344.00'
Ill':

64.29'

DIAL TOLL FREE
1(600) 227--2600
At Nlb rt .D40
o Yeti CIO
r•••Il••Y lsQ MA a 46w1rr 0 LIVIRA
BASIS OF wakes
780r
SEED 00 111 LIFE BE19F01STATI06
VW MO um' (P05161565 FOP
NSTIM L GEOXTIC 37RM►r1Y' 664603.

ERD1 1995.5) AS DM & Y.B. 402.

NOES 50 1FROIXi6 65178 MOM IN
COOT TE60TER S OFFICE I F
8111361E COMITY. CALIFORNIA
BEING: N 52'49'02.84" E

BENCHAMARIC CITY OF BEAULONT
5W/RPM NO. 07:A.82
1-1/6• BRASS CAP 1121.6ENT 28520
CITY B.N. Y. 1.021 D AT 17E S.E.

GORIER 14TH AID PLANS LVANIA' AVE..
59 FT. Sty MO 22 FT: MY CF
LENIE9.IAE INTERSECTION. 2 FT. S'LY OF
OF 9.C.R.

ELEV... 2878.277 (1982)
08 CEs:W00%
DATE
DOWER

REVISIONS
1 71
33138.23
•10400.00 F NI1 r•.1
.12.43.2C d6.0LT, VERONICA CT
•LANNINO • OCOION • CONSTRUCTION
r- 14 r PALM OESERT. CALIFORIA 02240.155
CONSULTING 1003461461 FAX 780340838 • wwu4OPNW
74310 oci. NTRY. CLUB sew, 61r18 sot
MTE: b7 1 N ! cri
R(£ O. 56661 DP. 8-21-07
35 ar UrM=ice-"
0 2
SCALE
1•. 40
PLOT 051e
Al. 11/2007
J 0100666
8 O
74 680
880

34.71.41 R in is 4
15419.21.17,22. LT IIGU014S UP
(STIEE1 STATIONS)-

5.11.2S ACANUOS
INT; FS 677.90
;7
Wawa eye !(� O60 (7i
APPF4ed sr� DOWIAD
City of Beaumont FthIc larineeriD KbHa
SO E. 61681)8:7
m(E7i7N-d520Rr AVta:'MP
pNd'n F QUI!,
1K1418 1'+ 40'
16111 1 � 4'

CONSTRUCTION NOTES

0. BASAL $ PVC SEIF7t MAIN. 508 NF.
© 06565.6. 4.81551 N MENTION DEVICE
(PAERIOIN F021 8'S 166YA OR 836116.). 4 EA.
1 1761711. 8 4' 10.60D F9IC SPR LITERAL.

O Fm COD 10 EA.
04 URDU 4' FIN 4Sl MIDE1E 140410.E BITN
CAST IRON VWIflE COVER PER CRIS SIB. 606. - - - -- 2 EA.

PAICA1E3 LOTS tEAUIRINO BADE FLOW DEVISE FOR SERER.

CITY OF BEAUMONT. CALIFORNIA
swam MINT PLANS
TRACT 31466-7

ACANTHUS LANE
6144 66851510 NITS
=TE IN OE NM I(4 OF =A.138.610. 541
G 116 enr a mum. 04.0166 NA
Pudee Hanes
SHEE
5 T
S
CF. -8 -SHEETS 3.

MARL N4E, I IC -
66655705.4.5 e

/i9R•Ur ra"
lortrz 4o''
YFRI: 1' • 4'
870
252.91 Li
.19LEROLIO-OVER PIFE.

S EISEE01FR PIPE:

Liffg

RORA' CONTAINED SINN THESE PLANS

SHALL NOT COAIYENCE VNTL AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ANO/OR A
CRAOINC DEPART HAS BEEN ISSUED.

RTE PAM 61I31YOTR swats BARE PlAid d
RE517SSSLE FOR ASSINAt RE ACCURCTAFD
AO ms:A /IY or RE ono IIBOOAI. N TAE
AAPROWIL'OR 0441Y0 ON
Malt FASM EEP BALL RE RESFMNIGE RA!
CERMAI1O Mel ALIEATA■E SWAN NAY
REVESM TAE FYAAS FAR APRCS90 BY THE OTE
13 •
12+56.51
9186:76.80' LT. =MICA cJ C.
12 CONSTRUCT 8 -PVC
670
560
11 VERONICA COURT
"-:LOT NA.NDI
677.' 79 +, 'PAD AEv.
_
E8
i 78
877�di
r aoB A GUTTER
RATER
�_ 1
y; _6,.418
I: a
O
1 e I 86 87
85 I84 ' I 7 ?6si
I .,57
'0 0 40 60 100
Lr-[AP111: SCALE
:G77.5)
10 AOFW7MJ8 LANE
BEE SHEET 5
IILI
1 [email protected]
870
660

12.43.26, 6.01T, VERONICA CT
•32198.97. 0.0'R1'. AMENS LE
(STREET STATIONS)
12+37.28 vERDIICA CT
12+82.97 AOANINUS LN
9 INT; FS 2673.85
SEWER DATA°_
o RYA 140
RADIl15

TANGENT

REIAARK
i 1g l
-■
-
.5TN
1'
i& 7.39
-
.31
-` g'
f vC
. .•W 951+,00'
.a3'

47.3o'
S' L
174:A419"1. �
306.00'
1 .•T!'
X1.67'
S PVC
T

DIAL TOLL FREE
1(800) 227-2600
ML OM
ORENNWIDm¢NJWO`10A NONGWOra
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

DESCRPTIDM
945E0 CH TIE LOVE B_T1W8 STATICAS
'TRWr /10 'LWTN' (POSITIONS PER
TIATIOVA! L'ECOETIC SLRYEY, N106T.

EPOCH 1995.5) AS SHOW By 8.9. M.

AWES 50 TIMM l5 OF MOATSIN
cwlsv RELY R's OFFICE OF
MIER9/ E cowry. C LIVO AIIA
BEING: N 52'49'02.84' E

BENCHMARK CITY OF BEAUMONT
OESCRPDOM NO. 07.A.82
1-1/8- MISS CAP ISPAAEMT IMMO
'CITY B.M. 7'. LOWED AT TIE S.E.

CORNER NTH AA(A PEAN FLPANIA AVE.,
59 FT. S'LY AMP 22 FT. E'LT OF
CDYTERJIAE IMERSECTIOV, 2 FT. S'LY Cr`--
OF B.C.R.
8Y OAR
ELEV... 2678.277 (1982) ENSIEBA
RE3838IONS
f-IX.9NOt6D met PEPS
FTNE919E3FALE SlER PIPE
i7'
179.25 LF •
-
CO•STRUCT.11:F" -VC- SEWER
31 30
29 E 31463.12 II Ni 312
14153.56.8.0' U. YANG/ UIQ
8' RATER

0.11* R GUTTER.
mp
(WNLt1 STATk)
16+48.78 .
:NT
PLANNING ■ DEMON ■ CONOT.ACOON
■. ■ P4430 COUNTRY C. YE O■ . SURE 201
r
PALM OE'SERL CAJFOFWA 82080-156'
CONSULTING 3104467481 • FAX 760.9441:n1-• ww.RBFm■
Pogc b1" i5
BATS mtll[JI�-
�07111 Er•.,2-84
soot
.- 211.4`_ LF
B'HVC
28 YARROW LANE
1 29169.81 %NL IU 6I I 4
16444.99 BACK
•161572.76 HEM 6.0' U. YARROW UI
74 1
•
880
670

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
0 INSTALL 8' PLC SEES MAIN. 643 LP.

O MULL
COD STD.M6000.. LATEih1L. 19 EA.
0 01sT/,. 4' NEW COMTE IMIEip1E Will(
CIST IRON MAMIE COYER. PER MO 510. 906- - - - 3 EA.

Ions)
`ACTT IA WAY
LATE
9 NIB: FS 0170.
1274641N ie w i1
f 30458.79 6A'IT. YARROI LAS
'111173. .0.019. POINSETTIA WAY
II
. I
°POINSETTIA WAY
GEE EIMEET2
e CIAB & G ITTFR /
25 1874 4j
18 Lor SUMER
PAD ELEV.

YIAAQR ad 918
City of BeaMmont PLtIc Wskb DPI DIOnent C. I rM OASrT
> 04 01011 51.031776971525 • 44x1641444 a Lf
CITY OF BEAUMEONT. CALIFORNIA

SWIM IMPROVESENT PLANS
TRACT $1466.7

VERONICA COURT
YARROW LAN.
6Tk 3!18181 TO 7!18196 6 6Tk sAgono 516481
10841FD In 110 111 1/4 if SEC 2. 1 313. R-1 1. SBI
I. DE CITY 6• 1F-10011, ONSINADA
SHEET
6 6 SNEERS
CORM 199-
65555796.Lop
Pardee Homes
H: \POATA\20100668\CAD0\UND\Oi:,V\IMPROVE\SEVIER\566SS706.DW0 MGW1LOPET 1/11/07.7:55 am

10 11
12 13
10 EDELWEISS DRNE
MEE TRACT sM88-8 MAJORS
SEWEREPLANE3
12 I1
WORK CONTAINED *NNW HIES£ PLA

SNAIL NOT COMMENCE UNIR AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ANO/OR A
CRAVING PERMIT HAS BEEN 'snot
or Abw75 alma WPC 0331 PANS 75
ACC7PAt6V/Y ei R@ 577558 Roam W rNe
Taw as 8a10HEVANCE5 AR'.56 ARER 077
A6PIA7N0 OR 6 6L' taldis nat RE
AaldlE O.GNefN 9R:N iE Wradlt( RI?
',moot AN ACLIPIAAIE 5070335 A40
R41am Nt AAN S A* AOAWOIFO Sr THE 0@i.
11 12

YARROW LANE
+0410.90
•124'0.00 4 07.70 8
12475.086.0' RT. E_DEI.IEISS 0R�
.10166.00; 6.0 LT. HMO LN
15 132
61�7d�pa S575 8t:
(STREET STATIONS)
10+00.00 OROIIS LN
12+47.30 5/481011 LN
E INT; FS 673.07
PLANE
SEE SNEET8
1 37.m �
.D0II cf. a
SEER
8 .873. 41.0
(STREET STAT4N6)
10400.00 Maw LN
•14469.00 EFE1-FEISS aR
9 40 0 C 90

GRA HIC SCALE
12 10 r 11

LOT HIABER
PAD ELEV 77
13 14

12.46.11!
-1500.00 6 MI #13
12432.67. 6.0.45. TAME UI
10405.85. 5.63'07, ORCOS UI
f8/C9
6' £I 124 It GUTTER
•
9RTER 1£TER
(0712 /

5..0
670
660
(STREET STATIONS)

12.85.53 moos LN ----"-
=10.00.06 VEAETIAN IN.L011 CT
E INT; FS 670.04
28 !75.76
4:-
27 (65 1',

WER DATA
OMTA Eric
RADI
REME00(
zz7 111
•
3i.

I.

N69'27'fa'e
-
141,18^
-
'1,3;7100;'
.2g'
146
?ill.
. P•
C0 27 1S'1�
1Y4. ttt
pvc
I
e•]O 51
735;714;t
706,
iA7.
4,;-i:
- PrC
TI
arm 77'0
-

87. 17'
17'
1'
e" WC
T

DAL TOLL FREE
1(900) 221-2800
tibiae 1b VA2 iDa 0q4
Rp5616mitb 81m6 N,66'v pm®n 5Ji V➢161

BAGS OF BEARINGS
EOM ON TIE LEAF EV IEF1-STAMM
'TAW 1751 7N171' ((600181086 A3?
NATIe4RL 6E00ET/C 3LRSEY. /1803.

EPOCH 1985.5 AS SONOM11.8. 702.

PACES 50 T 65 OF rams IN
way R£COROER's OFFICE CF

RIYFASEOE MUM, CALIFOENEA
BEYNG: N 52'49'02.84' E
BENCHMARK CITY OF EiEAWONT
tESCR 51 5 NO. 07.A.82
f-',Ar BRASS COP167664815716175
Ctir 0.1. r. L0047ED AT 776: S.C.

CORNER 741* A7D P680511.VANIA
.59(5. s'LTA7622FT: Ely CF
00208 0301MDE itot3sECT70V, 2 Ft. s'LY w-
e" B.C.R.

ELEV.,. 2878.277 (1982)
67 070.512

REVISIONS
129
;6711. 17."
120.3-LF�
--CONSTRUCT 8 -PVC SEINER,

CROWS LANE
SEE SHEET 6

OVER PETE

VENETIAN MALLOW COURT
111424.30 l4 W 179
11430.30. 6.0'LT, VETETIAN imam CT�
42 :E6t : f `6t:. :;,gin 40
I y ,/ 39
I
880
670'
TN- + r s7LATER
10100.00 6' c.043y 8 0.6 791
-12+66.61 6 Yl PiS II 4
70406.00. 6.0'LT.. RHEUM IPLIJN CTO
-12491.53. 6.0'RT. CR1741S LH

3.i
PLANNING ■ 05510* ■ CONSTRUCTION
.., 7433 WORRY CLUB DANE, SIZE 2
111 ` 21 PALM 0ESERT. CA5..ORNIA 65200•'556
CONSULTING 788748.7461. • FAA 1121216212A • wwnRBFmm
9 b111115
547E 011111 b7
82 NO 51661 EXP. it -3747
Lai HAM

PAO ELEV
DESIGN 66

CRAM BYE
*EOM 651
MSS
SCALE:

RAT OUEt
01/11/2007
2111 20100666
14 615.20
I 15456.33 flo

13.60.00,6.0• LT. 496.61 1 NUM CT®

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
mum 6` PVC son km.

O PI 51 4676131rLATERAL.

Q IEmT/U,. 4' PRECAST 0010 ETE WHOLE WITH
CAST IRON 00E 02(00 PER 0070 SID. 606. - - - - 4 EA.

Q MOVE CC PUS 1651 LOIN E%. 6• PC SEER. - - - - I EA.
ay O10eazmoo( PaE60 Works DaparC,AxE 550 E. 1/11 77557
BeP4 Ge 9162!
Enoksorke FA 7vq
DATslon ILL4551074&3520:• A200(9507t5.aur

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
1168641 IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 31488-7

YARROW LANE

VENETIAN MALLOW COURT
6TAc10100101A.008 6 6TA: 04001V.61M
=AND IN IC NI 1/4. If SC 2. 7 3 2. R 1.6. SRI
61 At 5111 OF 185941. C4LIFWI0A
hid* H0Rles
705LF.
18 EA.

SHEET

10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
Bgrg

CONTAINED WPM THEE PLANS
SHALL NOT COMME7ECE UN71L AN

ENCROACHMENT PERMIT ANWOR A
GRADING PERMT HAS BEEN iSSUEO.

DE NNWUE MOW 9CAw best PINE a
RESPO S®LE FOR ASLAaMS 71E ALYAWLY AAD
ACOEPA6[Rr 6F DIF 01315TH 7RNON. 67 7hE
Sits Of D607EfNKCS ABENG N7OR 09?
APPRmE O7 DORIVO CYAA57RU:NOM liE
A9ANR LIICAIER Vitt BE RESPOMSILE AAR
OFTOBOV61 AN ADCPEA•E MOWN ALO
RAMC ME FUNS FOR ANE BP 6r THE 067:

YARROW LANE 152
BEE SHEET 7 75. Bj
(STREET S7AT10N5)
10400.00 ORO41S LN
=12447:30 YARROW I N
$ INT: FS 673.07

10.05.15,5.63' RT. 050115 IN
-12+52.62, 6.0' LT. YAM IN
11 +0 49 Af0 'z

GRAPHIC SCALE
30 <11-6 76:.
282.64 if a ..

COMSTRVCT-8--PVC SEWER
(STREET STATIONS)

12.85.53 0110115 U4
=10.00.00 YFIC IAN 011105 CT
C INT; FS 676.04
131 130 120
C677.0 I ....§,S.0 ( iA`
O 9
�a I. 1 ill
'
-`/18:$ lF -

S SEWER

ORCHIS LANE
(
=10.00.00 L 165 115 0
12491.53.0.0' RT. 011085 LN
10105.00.6.0' LT, VENETIAN @LL09 CT
128 127 128
.$7o, :172) I F82 1J
1 3 2
1 1

VENETIAN MALLOW
SEE OHM 7 (t. '

SEWER DATA
104 7,4 114-211A- PALAIJI11. 11-. 1
fI111LYDiE`Zi ML.#EF3N=A8ELM 1111117_ 11111111111111=111 .111711Mil NUM= IIM•lif i.�
E1•IIIITKIWIL4.11 :11 WPZilfAll11111111111=1 1
664 ]F i1fIYAl LLLLLLLLL7 Llt..i[:101 t3Ci: 1
REMARK

DIAL TOLL FREE
1(800) 227-2600
N Look 01oMAIN Ow
- 640444 Y44016
woom e.6 mom Amvmaim orrtais
BA818 OF BEARING&
80670 ORME LIKE REDEEM STATIEA6
"iRAK" AND 'ILI1N' PoSIrl0I8 FUT
KNTIBVN. 6706710 711083:

EPODE 1985.5) A5 004011 E1 H.B. 102.

PAGES 50 WON 04 65.OF lELC0R0S BF
LG(AYrY FEMECER'S-OFFICE EF.

RIMS= £8077. C LIFORVU
BEING: N 52'49.'92.84` E
BENCHMAR(: CITY OF REAUAONT
=mom NO. 07. A.82
84ASS GIP 10V,*ENT wart
CITY B.H. 7'. LOCATED Ar TEE S.E.

EMIR 1418 MO F N SYLVANIA AYE..
59 FT. 5'Lr AM) 22 FT. E'Lr CF
OENIE9JIE !NIFRSECTI0V, 2 FT. 5'Lr
OF 9 C.R:

19..E1, 2878.277 (1982)
Or
MARX
64014201
015901'1171

REVISIONS
APPR
DAVE
Page
44 8
231:49-1F, •
COFETTh. T- 8"PVCSEWER
45 1
..r
6" (x178 AI OJ11ER
114+07.5616 IN x70
14+12.28.9.0' RT. IS (010619 LHO
PLANNING • OL•IUN • CONSTRUCTION

74.00 001) 0 CLUB OWN SATE 791
PALI4 DESERT. CNFOOIM 802404655
760.166.7461 • FAX 78031669E • NNWABFCom
5 0:10,57661 Ie4j s�13�
�j Y441
124
685-
675
665
•
0'P. (STREET STATICES)
20+00.00 BEGONIA WY
=16.44.36 MCNLS UA
C INT
110+43.8 I!- W 117 4
16460.36,0.0' ITT, (RODS LH
=19494.60.6.0' LT, ROOM NY
ISA 120
'S :GE t.

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
Qt BE1AL.I. S' PVC MIER MIN.

O MULL 4" BACIP O0 PREVEM101C LEVICE
(MEW(CI FOLICRY'S 1+53-A OR 110.61.). -.
itigrtsu
4' PLC SE7FR LATEIPL.

CRTD 510. 600.. -
Q INSTALL. 4' RECAST C(NCRE TE:IG)8OLE WTTN
CAST -INN WHOE COW3t PER 0510 570. ®e. - - -
635 LF.
1/SWAM LOTS REOULRIN9 BACK F1.0M ESVICE FOR MIIER.
3 EA.
17 EA.
3 EA,
CITY OF BEAUMONT. CALIFORNIA

SEWER IMPROVEMENT PLANS
TRACT 91489.7
QR1 IAN(
0404 104600 TO 1614001 -
LOWED DI 11£ 1/4 CO= 2, T 3 6, RI I, 901
IN.11C CIIT 10 worM7, 4L1P0A0k'
Pardee. Homes
SHEET

O' SWEETS
MARIN6 NNE 4-
�/ X36

When Recorded Return
Original To:

City of Beaumont
550 East 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223

NO RECORDING FEE REQUIRED PER
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
NOTICE is hereby given that the CITY OF BEAUMONT, 550 East 6th Street, Beaumont, California, 92223, a municipal corporation, is an owner in fee of easements in the properties hereinafter described. Said owner hereby ACCEPTS the maintenance of the following improvements:

Street Improvements for Tract No. 31468-6, PW2018-0127
Street and Storm Drain Improvements for Tract a No. 34290, PW2020-0554 Street and Storm Drain Improvements for Tract a No. 31468-5, PW2020-0539 Street, Storm Drain, and Sewer Improvements for Tract a No. 31468-7, PW2020-0540 on the property hereinafter described and that was COMPLETED prior to August 20, 2024, by the developer(s).

The property on which said work of improvement was completed in the City of Beaumont, County of Riverside, and State of California lying in Section(s) 02, Township 3 South, Range 1 West.

Date David Fenn,
Mayor of the City of Beaumont, CA
VERIFICATION:

I the undersigned am the Mayor of the City of Beaumont, the declaring of the foregoing Notice of Acceptance. I have read the said Notice of Acceptance and know the contents thereof: The same is true of my knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date David Fenn,
Mayor of the City of Beaumont, CA

A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document, to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On before me, Notary Public, personally appeared
, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

BY:

NOTARY
(SEAL)

AGREEMENT FOR INDEMNITY, REIMBURSEMENT AND RELEASE IN

EXCHANGE FOR BOND EXONERATION

THIS AGREEMENT FOR INDEMNITY, REIMBURSEMENT AND RELEASE IN EXCHANGE FOR BOND EXONERATION ("Agreement") is entered into between TR1 POLITE HOMES HOLDING INC.. a Delaware corporation ("Tri Pointe"). and the CITY OF BEAUMONT, a California municipal corporation ("City").' In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties do hereby agree as follows:

RECITALS
A. In connection with a residential project constructed by Tri Pointe in the City known as Su.ndance which includes Tract No. 31468-6, Tract No. 34290, Tract No. 31468-5. and Tract No. 3146E-7 (collectively, the "Projects), the City is currently holding certain bonds previously provided by Tri Pointe to the City pursuant to the Subdivision Improvement Agreements (individually, a "SLI" and collectively, the "SL4s") for the Projects for purposes of securing the completion of certain infrastructure improvements in the Projects; B. The total lots in the Projects are as follows: 159 lots in Tract No. 31468-6.23 lots in Tract No. 34290. 110 lots in Tract No. 31468-5, and 132 lots in Tract No. 31468-7, for a total number of 424 lots in the Projects combined:

C. The Projects are fully constructed per approved plans, including all infrastructure secured by the bonds currently being held by the City, and all residential units ire the Projects have been sold to homebuyers;
D. The amounts of the bonds and the bond numbers for the Projects that the City is currently holding are as follows: (1) Bond No. 5022637 for $2,236,624.65 for Tract No. 31468- 6; (2) Bond No. 52BSBDL9439 for 8163,323.00 for Tract No. 34290, (3) Bond No. 5022636-M for $237,846.79 for Tract No. 31468-5, and (4) Bond No. 82296452-M for $159,893.27 for Tract No. 31468-7, for a total amount of $2,797,687.71 (collectively, the "Bonds"); E. The City has not yet exonerated the Bonds due to a dispute between the City and Tri Pointe regarding certain improvements secured by the Bonds, and, F. Pursuant to this Agreement, the City agrees to terminate the SIAs and exonerate the Bonds in exchange for Tri Pointe agreeing to provide certain indemnification and reimbursement payments to the City, as set forth in more detail below.

Tri Pointe and City are at times referred to herein individually as a 'Party:' and collectively as "the Parties."
-1-

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals which are incorporated by reference herein, and in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, Tri Pointe and City agree as follows:

1. Effective Date.

This Agreement shall become effective and legally binding on the Parties on the date upon which this Agreement has been fully executed by Tri Pointe and the City (the "Effective

2. Term.

Unless otherwise terminated earlier by mutual written consent of the Parties, the term of this Agreement shall be for a period of ten. (10) years, commencing on the Effective Date and automatically expiring on the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date (the "Term").

3. Indemnity.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, and at its sole expense, Tri Pointe promises and agrees that for a period of ten (10) years commencing on the Effective Date of this Agreement, to hold harmless, defend (with counsel of City's choice), protect and indemnify the City, its elected and appointed officials, employees, agents, and attorneys from and against any and all liabilities, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, court actions, lawsuits, losses, expenses, or costs, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness fees and court costs (collectively, `Actions"), which it may sustain as the result of any claim(s), proceeding(s), suits), action(s), or lawsuit(s) brought against City under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12101) (the "ADA"); the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.); the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov't. Code § 12900 et seq.); the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Cal. Civil Code § 51); the Disabled Persons Act (Cal. Civil Code § 54 et seq.); or any other similar local, state or federal act or regulation in connection with any of the sidewalks and/or driveway aprons for the residential units in the Projects.

4. Reimbursement.

In addition to the foregoing, Tri Pointe agrees that immediately upon execution of this Agreement, it will pay City the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars (525,000) to defray attorneys' fees, staff time and costs incurred by the City in connection with this matter.

5. Termination of Subdivision Improvement Agreements; Release of Securities.

Upon the Effective Date, this Agreement shall serve as the Parties' mutual written consent to terminate all four SIAs for the Projects in their entirety. Within ten (10) calendar days of the Effective Date of this Agreement and Tri Pointe's payment referred to in section 4 above, City agrees to take any and all actions, and execute any and all documents necessary to cause the

Bonds currently being withheld by the City under the SIAs for the Projects to be fully released and exonerated.

6. Event of Default.

Failure by a Party to perform any action or covenant required by this Agreement within the time periods provided herein following notice and failure to cure as described hereafter, constitutes a "Default" or "Event of Default" under this Agreement. A Party claiming a Default shall give written Notice of Default to the other Party specifying the Default. The claimant shall not institute any. proceedings against the other Party. and such other Party shall not be in Default ifsuch Party within thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of such Notice of Default, immediately and with due diligence, commences to cure, correct or remedy the specified Default and shall complete such cure, correction or remedy with diligence. In the event the Party in Default, or causing such Default, fails to cure within said thirty (30) days, or if such breach is of a nature that it cannot be cured within said thirty (30) days, then the defaulting Party shall commence to cure in an additional fifteen (15) days (i.e., within forty-five (45.) days of Notice of Default) and the defaulting Party shall diligently complete such cure, correction or remedy within a reasonable time thereafter but in no event later than one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of the Notice of Default.

7. Institution of Legal Actions.

In addition to any other rights or remedies and subject to the restrictions otherwise set forth in this Agreement. any Party may institute an action at law or equity to seek specific performance of the terms of this Agreement. or to cure, correct or reified} any Default. to recover drunftges for any Default, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purpose of this Agreement.

8. Inaction Not a Waiver of Default.

Any failures or delays by either Party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any Default shall not operate as a waiver of any Default or of any such rights or remedies. or deprive either such Party of its right to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies,

9. Applicable Law And Venue.

The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. The Parties agree that venue in any litigation between them related to this Agreement shall be in Riverside County, California.
-3-

10. Notices. All notices, demands, approvals and other communications in connection with this Agreement shall be in writing and be delivered to the appropriate party at its address as follows:
if to Tri Pointe:

If to City:

Tri Pointe Homes Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corp
. Tri Pointe Homes 1E -SD, Inc., a California
corporation.
11250 Corona Pointe Ct, #600
Corona, CA 92879
Attention: Mike Taylor, Division President
Frriail: Mi e.Tae1gnEeTriP;sinnteHor es.eo
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
Attn: City Manager and City Attorney

11. Amendments and Counterparts.
rts.

All amendments_ or modifications of this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be signed by both of the Parties. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts with the same effect as if all original signatures were placed on one document, all of which together shall be one and the same agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, a facsimile or sheet (pdf or .tif file or equivalent) signature shall be considered as the equivalent of an original signature, shall be deemed good and valid acceptance of this Agreement, shall be reasonably relied upon by the Parties, and in counterparts that shall together constitute the Parties' Agreement as if it was one original instrument. This Agreement does not affect any other agreement between the City and Tri Pointe, including, but not limited to the Sundance Development Agreement.

12. Severabitityt.

In the. event any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein.

13. Time is of the Essence.
'I'ime is of the essence of all of the provisions of this Agreement.

14. Authority of Signatories to Agreement
Each person executing this Agreement represents and warrants that he or she is duly authorized and has legal capacity to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the Party for which such execution is made, and has the requisite authority to bind his or her respective Party.
_q_

15. Entire Agreement
This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties. This Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the Parties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof.

INT WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth below.
"TRI POINTE"
Tri Pointe Homes Holdings. Inc., a Delaware Corp.

J, I;~.;`�:

By: . 9 w .-`-
Glenn J. Keeler, Chief Financial Officer
;.CITY„

CITY OF BEAUMONT,
a California municipal corporation
1634618.7
[Insert one and title
ATTEST:

W ii' Nrt-'4 'F'4v^C3G AA
NJICUte vel'ufl1btt, 17 /41 £a=,5 e
d427,401.-'
APPROVED TO FORM:

O. Pxnkney, City ey
-5-

BAUME ONTA -c A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Carole Kendrick, Interim Community Development Director DATE August 20, 2024
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Consideration of Proposed Amendments to the Beaumont Municipal Code Chapter 9.03 "Regulations of Special Events", "Definitions" Section 9.03.020.1. (PLAN2024-0064)
Description Recommended amendments to the Beaumont Municipal Code Section

9.03.020.1.1 and 9.03.020.1.2 related to definitions for major and minor special events to be consistent with the current fee schedule.

Background and Analysis:

At the July 16, 2024, City Council meeting, the proposed item was continued to the August 20, 2024, City Council date to allow for further research into the fee schedule in relation to special events. During this period, staff determined that necessary changes would need to be made to the City's adopted Development Fee schedule.

Annual fee adjustments will be made to the fee schedule utilizing the current consumer price index (CPI), per the March 7, 2023, City Council staff report that considered the updated fee study. Staff is requesting to incorporate the special event fee modifications with the CPI update and bring an updated Zoning Ordinance Amendment concurrently.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this staff is approximately $250.

Recommended Action:

Continue the public hearing to a future date to allow staff additional time to propose CPI adjustments to the fee schedule.

Incorporated herein by Reference:

City of Beaumont General Plan
City of Beaumont Zoning Ordinance

Development Related Fee Schedule effective July 1, 2023 Contents of City of Beaumont Planning Department Project File PLAN2024-0064 Resolution No. 2023-03 (Adopting a Comprehensive Fee Schedule Update and Adopting a Comprehensive Fee Schedule Establishing User Fees for Certain Specified Services

BAUME ONTA -c A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Jillian Fountain, Assistant Planner
DATE August 20, 2024
SUBJECT: Public Hearing of Tentative Parcel Map 38953 (PM2024-0003) for Consideration of a Finance and Conveyance Map to Subdivide 110.19 Acres into Six (6) Parcels, located in Planning Area 20 of the Oak Valley & SCPGA Golf Course Specific Plan. APN: 413-790-010
Description An application for a Tentative Parcel Map 38953 for Consideration of a Finance and Conveyance Map located in Planning Area 20 of the Oak Valley & SCPGA Golf Course Specific Plan.

Background and Analysis:

The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel Map No. 38953 (PM2024- 0003) for a finance and conveyance map for the subdivision of 110.19 acres into six (6) parcels, in Planning Area 20 of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 31462 within the Oak Valley & SCPGA Golf Course Specific Plan. The proposed application is consistent with the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) that was adopted for the underlying project Oak Valley & SCPGA Golf Course Specific Plan (SP318/ EIR418).

The Oak Valley SCPGA Specific Plan #318 encompassing 1,747.9 acres allowing 4,355 dwelling units was adopted by the County of Riverside on August 14, 2001. The property was annexed into the City of Beaumont on April 9, 2003, by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) by LAFCO 2002-43-5. The Oak Valley SCPGA Specific Plan includes the developments of Fairway Canyon and Tournament Hills. The subject property is located within the Fairway Canyon portion of the specific plan.

The subject property is located within Phase 4C of the development and more specifically in Planning Areas 20A1, 20A2, 20B1, 20B2, 20C1 and 20C2 as shown in Exhibit F.

The proposed finance and conveyance map does not allow development of the parcels but does provide larger lots to be sold or transferred. Future development of the lots will require the recordation of final tract maps, in which tentative tract maps are already

approved for the subject property. The project has been conditioned to preclude development until such time that the final tract maps are recorded.

Project Setting:

The project setting can also be seen in the following materials attached to this staff report:
• General Plan Land Use Map (Attachment C)
• Zoning Map (Attachment D)
• Aerial Photograph (Attachment E)
The 110.19 -acre site is currently vacant. The property is located in an area which contains single family residences to the north and east, and vacant land to the south and west. The land uses, zoning, and General Plan land use designations of the project site and surrounding area are shown in the following table.

LAND USE

GENERAL PLAN
ZONING

PROJECT
SITE
Vacant Land
Single Family
Residential
Oak Valley Specific Plan
(SPA)
NORTH
Single Family
Residential
Open Space
Oak Valley Specific Plan
(SPA)
SOUTH
Vacant Land
Open Space
Oak Valley Specific Plan
(SPA)
EAST
Single Family
Residential
Single Family
Residential
Oak Valley Specific Plan
(SPA)
WEST
Vacant Land
Single Family
Residential (SFR)
Oak Valley Specific Plan
(SPA)
Development Review Committee (DRC):

The Development Review Committee reviewed the project for design on May 30, 2024.

Staff from the various City departments provided written comments that have been incorporated into the proposed conditions of approval.

Zoning Consistency:

The use is subject to and is consistent with the Development Standards for the Specific Plan zone. The use would meet the objectives of the approved zoning and the use and is compatible with uses permitted in the zone, subject to approval of a Plot Plan.

General Plan Consistency:

The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of Beaumont. The land use designation for the project site is Single Family Residential as shown in Attachment C. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan policies in Goal 3.3, 3.3.1 "Support the development of new housing opportunities, as defined by the Land Use Plan contained in this Element."
CEQA Review:

From the standpoint of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified in 2001 for the Oak Valley SCPGA Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 318) (SCH# 2000051126), with latest Addendum of the EIR was approved by City Council in 2014 (13-EIR-03), assessing the environmental impacts of the overall project and subsequent implementation steps, including subdivision of the site. The EIR and the findings made by the City Council remain pertinent and adequate for use for current application. Execution of this subdivision will require adherence to the mitigation monitoring program established for the project.

Public Communications:

On August 6, 2024, property owners located within a 300 -foot radius of the project site were notified of the public hearing. In addition, a notice was published in the Press Enterprise newspaper with a 10 -day advanced notice of the hearing. At the time of report preparation, the Planning Department has not received any letters of comment from the public in favor or opposition to the project. Any comments received prior to the time of the scheduled City Council meeting will be provided at the time of the public hearing.

Approval Authority:

The Beaumont Municipal Code, Section 16.04.020 designates the Planning Commission as the "advisory agency" charged with reviewing and making recommendations on all proposed parcel map land divisions and tentative subdivision maps in the city. Section 16.24.050.A authorizes the Planning Commission to conditionally approval or disapprove all tentative parcel maps and tentative subdivision maps and land divisions and submit to the City Council for final approval.

When a tentative map is required under the Subdivision Map Act (66463.5(a)), an approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall expire 24 months after its

approval or conditional approval. The Subdivision Map Act does allow for up to four (4) years of extensions subject to approval by the original approving body, however the proposed subdivision is subject to the Development Agreement (City of Beaumont Resolution No. 1987-34) dated November 18, 2003, which has a term of 25 years (Item 7 of the DA) and tentative tract maps shall be granted an extension of time for the term of the Development Agreement (Item 33 of the DA). Therefore, the expiration date for the proposed subdivision is November 18, 2028.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost for staff review and staff report preparation is $500.00.

Recommended Action:

Hold a public hearing;
Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 38953 (PM2024-0003) subject to the Development Agreement and the attached conditions of approval; and
Direct staff to prepare a Notice of Determination for the Applicant to file with the Riverside County Clerk Recorder.

Attachments:

A. Tentative Parcel Map No. 38953
B. Draft Conditions of Approval
C. General Plan Land Use Designation Map
D. Zoning Map
E. Aerial Photograph
F. Fairway Canyon - Phase 4 Phasing Map
G. Proof of Publication
Incorporated herein by Reference:

City of Beaumont General Plan
City of Beaumont Zoning Ordinance
Project Site's Riverside Conservation Authority Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan Informational Map
Contents of City of Beaumont Planning Department Project File Tentative Parcel Map No. 38953 (PM2024-0003), Tentative Tract Map No. 31426, LAFCO 2002-43-5, 02- ANX-02, Development Agreement dated November 18, 2003, PLAN2021-0625 (Partial Assignment & Assumption of Development Agreement), Oak Valley SCPGA Specific Plan 318 and Environmental Impact Report 418.

11FAIRWAY CANYON - 4C CONVEYANCE PURPOSES""FOR FINANCE ANDTENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38953VICINITY MAP10SITETENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38953"FOR FINANCE AND CONVYANCE PURPOSES"ENGINEERLAND USEOWNER/DEVELOPERSCHOOL DISTRICTUTILITY PURVEYORSSITE INFORMATIONCONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIPEXISTING EASEMENT NOTES:BASIS OF BEARINGSBENCHMARK NOTE:LEGAL DESCRIPTIONLOT / PARCEL AREA TABLEGENERAL NOTESPage 334 of 805

BEAUMONT

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PLANNING DEPARTMENT

DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
-CALIFORNIA-
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: July 24th, 2024
CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20th, 2024
PROJECT NAME: Tentative Parcel Map No. 38953
PROJECT NO.: PM2024-0003
DESCRIPTION: A request for a finance and conveyance map to subdivide 110.90 acres into six (6) parcels, for Tentative Tract Map 38953, located in Planning Area 20 of the Oak Valley & SCPGA Golf Course Specific Plan
APPLICANT: Meritage Homes of California, a California Corporation LOCATION: West of Sorenstam Drive and north of San Timoteo Canyon Road APN: Portion of 413-790-010

PROJECT
Note: Any conditions revised at a hearing will be noted by strikeout (for deletions) and/or underline (for additions), and any newly added conditions will be added at the end of all conditions regardless of the Department originating the condition.

STANDARD CONDITIONS
The following conditions of approval are for Tentative Parcel Map No. 38953 and consist of all subsequent conditions and all conditions of approval for the Oak Valley Specific Plan (SP No. 318) and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan.

1. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Beaumont, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Beaumont, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Beaumont, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38953 and the Environmental Impact Report certified by the Beaumont City Council in conjunction with the SCGPA Golf Course at Oak Valley Specific Plan, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code, Section 66499.37. The City of Beaumont will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Beaumont and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Beaumont.

Tentative Parcel Map No. 38953
Draft Conditions of Approval

2. The subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the pertinent requirements of The Beaumont Municipal Code, unless modified by the conditions listed below.

3. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire on November 18, 2028, per 7 of the Development Agreement between the City of Beaumont and SDC Fairway Canyon LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, that has been partially assigned and assumed by Meritage Homes of California, Inc., a California corporation.

Action on a minor change and/or revised map request will not extend the time limits of the tentative map. Approval of the final map by the City Council is required.

4. The conveyance/financing purposes map is located within the SCGPA Golf Course at Oak Valley Specific Plan. The project is limited to the overall density and intensity, allowed uses, design guidelines, including entry monumentation and landscaping, setbacks shall comply with SCGPA Golf Course at Oak Valley Specific Plan.

5. This map is approved for financing and land conveyance purposes only. No applications for building permits or grading permits shall be submitted for the parcels/lots created by this map until approval of subsequent tentative maps for development purposes.

6. If required by the Planning Department, within ten (10) days of approval by the City Council ten (10) copies of an Amended Per Final Conditions map shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department prior to release of the final conditions of approval.

7. Any subsequent review/approvals required by the conditions of approval, including but not limited to grading, landscaping, plot plan and/or building plan review, shall be reviewed on an hourly basis based on, or such fee as may be in effect at the time of submittal.

8. The subdivider shall be fully responsible for maintenance and upkeep of any and all slopes, landscaped areas, open space areas, future development areas and irrigation systems until such time as maintenance responsibilities are assumed by other as approved by the Planning Department.

9. The properties contained within Tentative Parcel Map 38953 are part of the SCPGA Golf Course at Oak Valley Specific Plan Specific Plan, approved originally by the Beaumont City Council on November 5, 2002, and later amended in 2004, 2005, 2014 and 2021. The provisions and criteria of the SCPAGA Golf Course at Oak Valley Specific Plan shall control and guide the development.

10. An Environmental Impact Report EIR was prepared and certified for the SCPGA Golf Course at Oak Valley Specific Plan Specific Plan, Addendum(s) were

Tentative Parcel Map No. 38953
Draft Conditions of Approval

prepared for the subsequent amendment and a series of mitigation measures were adopted by the City Council to mitigate the potential impacts of the project. All of the mitigation measures set forth in the subject environmental document are herewith established as conditions of approval for the underlying Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 31462.

11. The approval of this map shall not result in any vesting provisions relative to City of Beaumont fees and exactions. The provisions of the Development Agreement shall prevail in all cases.

12. The proposed parcels shall have legal access from a public road, or access shall be feasible and required by conditions of approval of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 31462.

FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced project, the Fire Department requires the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:

13. Prior to Recordation: All lots have acceptable legal access either by lot configuration or by a separate recorded document. A conceptual engineering design shall be submitted to provide assurance that access can be designed and constructed.

A. Provide conceptual engineering design to ensure access can be designed and constructed to each lot per Riverside County Ordinance 460 Section

10.16. PUBLIC WORKS

14. All lots or parcels will have access to a public street either by lot configuration or by a separate document of dedication to be recorded concurrently with a parcel map or tract map. A concept -level engineering effort must be submitted with the tentative map to provide assurance that access can be designed and constructed.

15. When the property owner desires to obtain a permit to improve any of the lots/parcels created by this process, a separate tentative map and parcel map or tract map will be required to obtain those development rights.

End of
Conditions

TPM 38953 General Land Use Designation Map
1:18,056

0.25 7/17/2024, 2:37:22 PM
General Plan
4 Open Space
Single Family Residential
Rural Residential 1
City Boundary
Street Labels

0 I
0 0.13

0.5 mi

0.2 0.4
County of San Bernardino, Maxar

0.8 km
City of Beaumont
County of San Bernardino, Maxar I RCIT GIS, LAFCO I RCIT I Riverside County Assessor / RCIT

TPM 38953 Zoning Map
7/17/2024, 2:36:33 PM
Zoning
City Boundary
Union Pacific Rail Roadway Street Labels
Specific Plan

0 I
0 1:18,056

0.13 0.25 0.5 mi
+ i r II

0.2 0.4 0.8 km
County of San Bernardino, Maxar
City of Beaumont
County of San Bernardino, Maxar I RCIT GIS, LAFCO I RCIT I Riverside County Assessor / RCIT

TPM38953 Aerial Photograph
PM2024-0003
0 752
0 1 505 Feet
`IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user.

REPORT PRINTED ON... 7/17/20 4 2:33:5 P
© Riverside County GIS
Notes
Legend

7..1
County Boundary
City Boundaries
Parcels, Public
Blueline Streams
City Areas

® NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS
PHASE 4A - ± 111.6 AC
PHASE 48-±107.9AC
PHASE 4C - ± 105.0 AC
PA -20A2 64
50X100

PROPOSED DESIGN
P.A

LOT/PAD SIZE
#OF LOTS

ACREAGE

HOME BUILDER
25A
47'X80'
126

22.07 AC GROSS
26A
45'X100'
167

33.17 AC GROSS
26B
50'X100'
101

20.80 AC GROSS
25B
55'X90'
73 13.67 AC GROSS
25C
55'X90'
62 13.05 AC GROSS

SUBTOTAL
529
18A
55'X100'
77 DR HORTON
18B
50'X100'
111

MERITAGE HOMES
22A
60'X100'
67 MERITAGE HOMES
22B
60'X100'
55 DR HORTON
22C
55'X100'
55 MERITAGE HOMES
22D
55'X100'
54 MERITAGE HOMES

SUBTOTAL
419
20A1
50'X100'
59 MERITAGE HOMES
20A2
50'X100
64 MERITAGE HOMES
20B1
45'X80'
68 MERITAGE HOMES
20B2
SCHOOL

12.80 AC GROSS
20C1
55'X100'
107

MERITAGE HOMES
20C2
55'X100'
68 MERITAGE HOMES

SUBTOTAL
366
TOTAL
1314

REVISIONS
DATE
BY
DATE
BY
PA -20C2 68
55X100
PA -20A1 59
50X100
PA -20C1 10
55X100

PROPOSED
SCHOOL
PA -2081 68 SITE
45X80 PA -2082

12.80 AC
PA -228 55
0X100
PA -22D 54
55X100
PA -22C 55
55X100
Oq
FAIRWAY CANYON PHASE 4
SCALE: 1 "=700'
DATE: 7/18/2024
DESIGNED: CG
CHECKED: RS
PLN CK REF:

F.B.

PA -25C V="1
55X90

13.05 AC
PA -25B (7"-
55X90

13.67 AC
PA -25A
47X80

22.07 AC
Kimley »Horn
3801 UNIVERSITY AVE, SUITE 300, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
PHONE: (951) 543-9868 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
PROJ. NO. 19526102
SHEET
OF
1 1
SHEETS
7/18/2024 12:08:20 PM
OVERALL PANNING AREAS.DWG
MLC FAIRWAY CANYON 4C\CAD\EXHIBITS\2024.07.17
K:\RIV_LDEV\ 1 95261 012

BEAUMONTA O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
DATE August 20, 2024
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Consideration of a Resolution for the First Amendment to the City's FY 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Plan
Description Approval of a Resolution to amend the five-year FY 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).

Background and Analysis:

The City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a 5 -year planning document which identifies the major capital improvement expenditures and gives a proposed sequence of implementing their design and construction. The CIP is reviewed, revised, and adopted annually to account for completed and newly identified projects. Occasionally, the CIP is amended within a given year to promote better use of the City's limited financial resources, focus priorities, update projects, and assist in the coordination of public and private development.

On June 4, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-15 "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont Adopting a Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2025-2029." Government Code Section 66002 allows the City Council to periodically update the adopted CIP.

On July 16, 2024, the County of Riverside Deputy Chief Pemberton agreed to sell to the City a fire engine that is pending delivery to the County. At that meeting, City Council directed staff to work with the County of Riverside to purchase that fire engine, requiring a capital improvement plan amendment. Included in the proposed budget are costs to cover required equipment needed once the vehicle is delivered.

Staff is proposing to amend the CIP by adding the fire engine and engine equipment purchase.

NEW PROJECTS

F25-02 Fire Engine: Purchase a Smeal Type 1 Pumper with tool mounting, 360 camera system, waterous pump oil cooler, raise hose bed pre -connects, scene lights for cab roof corners, and necessary equipment to outfit the engine.

Funding Source
New Budget
Fire Services DIF
$700,000
General Fund
$1,000,000
Fiscal Impact:

The estimated cost to prepare this staff report is $413.

The estimated impact to the Fire Services DIF is $700,000 and the remaining $1,000,000 from FY2025 unprogrammed revenues for a total of $1,700,000. The following table is a summary of the project budget change and funding source.

CIP
Project
Budget
Changes
Funding
Source
FY
Funding
Update
F25-02 Fire Engine and Engine
Equipment
$1,700,000
Fire
Services
DIF and
General
Fund
2025
A New
Project
Recommended Action:

Hold a Public Hearing, and
Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont Amending the Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2025-2029"; and
Approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $1,700,000.

Attachments:

A. CIP Resolution Amendment No. 1
B. Public Notice
C. Budget Adjustment Form

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT

AMENDING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2025-2029
WHEREAS, on June 04, 2024, the City Council of the City of Beaumont adopted the City's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2029 ("CIP") at a duly noticed public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Beaumont desires to amend CIP, as defined below;
WHEREAS, these specific revisions are detailed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code, section 66002, the City duly gave public notice of the public hearing of the proposed amendments and revisions to the CIP, a copy of which has been on file with the City Clerk at least 10 calendar days prior to the City Council's commencement of such public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to revise and amend the Capital Improvement Plan as set forth herein;

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BEAUMONT CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council hereby approves and amends the Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2029, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by this reference.

Section 2. The Capital Improvement Plan may be updated by the City Council from time to time pursuant to California Government Code, section 66002, or as otherwise provided by law.

Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption.

MOVED, PASSED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
1

By:

David Fenn, Mayor
City of Beaumont
ATTEST:

By:

Nicole Wheelwright
Deputy City Clerk
2

EXHIBIT A
SUMMARY OF FY 2024 —2028 CIP BUDGET AMENDMENT No. 5
3

THE PRESS -ENTERPRISE

KEEP YOUR EYES ON THE 'PRISE
pe.com
3512 14 Street
Riverside, California 92501
(951) 368-9229
[email protected]
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, California 92223
Account Number:

Ad Order Number:

Customer's Reference/PO Number:

Publication:

Publication Dates:

Total Amount:

Payment Amount:

Amount Due:

Notice ID:

Invoice Text:
5209298
0011685693
The Press -Enterprise
08/10/2024
$174.51
$0.00
$174.51
HE6nxgpsLSWNgtiYWDgQ
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City of Beaumont will conduct a public hearing to consider the matter described below. The City of Beaumont's public hearing will be held at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 20, 2024, at 550 East Sixth Street, Beaumont, California. REVISIONS TO THE APPROVED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PLAN FOR FYS 2024/25 - 2028/29 This meeting will be open to the public and will be recorded for live streaming on the City's official YouTube webpage . Please use the following link during the meeting for live stream access: BeaumontCa.gov/Livestream Public comments will be accepted using the following options: 1. Emailed comments will be read aloud during the corresponding item of the meeting. Please submit your comments to [email protected] 2. In person public comments. 3. Call -in comments using a designated public comment phone line (951) 922-4845. City Council will conduct a public hearing to receive testimony and comments from all interested persons. Public comments shall not exceed three minutes unless otherwise authorized by City Council. Comments can be submitted any time prior to the meeting as well as during the meeting until the end of the corresponding item. Dated: August 6, 2024

CIP Amendment 1 - Page 1 of 1

THE PRESS -ENTERPRISE

KEEP YOUR EYES ON THE 'PRISE
The Press -Enterprise
3512 14 Street
Riverside, California 92501
(951) 368-9229
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, California 92223
Publication: The Press -Enterprise

PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF
Ad Desc: 0011685693
FILE NO. 0011685693

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
I am a citizen of the United States. I
am over the age of eighteen years and
not party to or interested in the above -
entitled matter. I am an authorized
representative of THE PRESS -
ENTERPRISE, a newspaper of general
circulation, printed and published daily
in the County of Riverside, and which
newspaper has been adjudicated a
newspaper of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of
Riverside, State of California, under
date of April 25, 1952, Case Number
54446, under date of March 29, 1957,
Case Number 65673, under date of
August 25, 1995, Case Number
267864, and under date of September
16, 2013, Case Number RIC 1309013;
that the notice, of which the annexed is
a printed copy, has been published in
said newspaper in accordance with the
instructions of the person(s) requesting
publication, and not in any supplement
thereof on the following dates, to wit:
08110/2024
I certify (or declare) under the penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.

Date: August 10, 2024.

At: Riverside, California
Signature
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City of Beaumont will conduct a public hearing to consider the matter described below. The City of Beaumont's public hearing will be held at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 20, 2024, at 550 East Sixth Street, Beaumont, California.

REVISIONS TO THE APPROVE❑ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT PLAN FOR FY52024/25-2028/29
This meeting will be open to the public and will be recorded for live streaming on the City's official YouTube webpage . Please use the following link during the meeting for live stream access:

BeaumontCa.gov/Livestream
Public comments will be accepted using the following options:

1. Emalled comments will be read aloud during the corresponding item of the meeting. Please submit your comments to NlcoleW@ BeaumantCa.gov

2. In person public comments.

3. Call-ln comments using a designated public comment phone line (951) 922-4845.

City Council will conduct a public hearing to receive testimony and comments from all interested persons. Public comments shall not exceed three minutes unless otherwise authorized by City Council.

Comments can be submitted any time prior to the meeting as well as during the meeting until the end of the corresponding Item.

Dated: August 6, 2024
The Press -Enterprise
Published: 8/10/24

CIP Amendment 1 - Page 1 of 1

DATE:

BEAUMONT
—C: A I. I I- t) H N IA -
8/20/2024
City of Beaumont
Budget Adjustment Form
FY 2023/2024
DEPARTMENT NAME: Fire
PREPARED BY: Jennifer Ustation

APPROVED BY
*Account Number for Example only
Revenue = (Credit)
Expense = Debit
Revenue = (Credit)
Expense = Debit
Debit
(Credit)

ACCOUNT NUMBER

ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION

CURRENT BUDGET

ADJUSTMENT

NEW BUDGET AMT
Explanations / Justification
560-0000-9960-0000
Transfers Out
-
700,000.00
700,000.00
Transfer to Project F25-02 Fire Engine
100-0000-9960-0000
Transfer Out
5,927,743.00
1,000,000.00
6,927,743.00
Transfer to Project F25-02 Fire Engine
500-0000-9950-0000 F25 -
02T
Transfers In
(12,744,560.00)
(1,700,000.00)
(14,444,560.00)
Transfer in Project F25-02 Fire Engine
500-0000-8060-0000
F25 -02A
Vehicles
-
1,700,000.00
1,700,000.00
Project F25-02 Fire Engine
TOTALS
$ 1,700,000.00
Net Effect

https://beaumontca.sharepoint.com/sites/financegroup2/Shared Documents/Budgets/FY2024-2025/Budget Adjustments/Budget Adjustment Form 1: Budget Adjustment Form (2)

BAUME ONTA -C A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Robert L. Vestal, Public Works Director
DATE August 20, 2024
SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
Description Approve the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines.

Background and Analysis:

On June 16, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-20, vehicle miles of travel (VMT) significance thresholds and level of service (LOS) guidelines in response to Senate Bill (SB) 743. SB 743 changed how transportation impacts are measured under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) from using vehicle LOS to using Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). The adopted thresholds of significance for determining the significance of transportation impacts were recommended in an analysis conducted by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) on behalf of its member jurisdictions. The WRCOG study (Study) was prepared by Fehr and Peers. The Study also provided guidance on TIA, which City staff currently uses as a standard.

On December 1, 2020, the City Council adopted the 2040 General Plan which included Circulation Element Goal 4.1.2 "Maintain LOS D on all auto -priority streets in Beaumont."
On March 5, 2024, City Council received a presentation on Level of Service (LOS).

During the meeting, City Council directed staff to consider a LOS C for select parts of the City and develop TIA guidelines that reduce traffic impacts from new development and significant redevelopment.

Subsequently, City staff directed Fehr and Peers to develop TIA guidelines specific to the City. The purpose of Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines is to provide general instructions for analyzing the potential transportation impacts of proposed development projects (e.g., general plan amendments and zoning changes). These guidelines present the recommended format and methodology that should generally be utilized in preparing TIAs.

The proposed TIA Guidelines include an update to the LOS, enhanced requirements, and minor changes to the VMT guidance based on experience gained by City staff since 2020.

Level of Service Update:

Current
• LOS D on all auto -priority streets
• LOS E on all other streets
Proposed
• LOS C for any study facility located
on or west of Pennsylvania
Avenue and south of 1-10 (e.g.

LOS C for the southwest portion of
the City)
• LOS D at all other locations in the
City
Enhanced Requirements:

The TIA is a technical document with several requirements, methods, and procedures.

There are several changes proposed; the following are notable:
• Protected left -turn phasing are mandatory when the peak hour left turn volume exceeds 240 vehicles or when the left -turn crosses more than two through lanes or when the conflicting through volume may create potential safety concerns • The City supports use of protected/permissive phasing for streets that are four lanes or less, where there is good viability, and where speeds are not too high and should be recommended when appropriate
• For developments that will generate significant heavy vehicle volumes (more than 50 heavy vehicles per day), the analysis must also include the following assessment:
o Detailed review of all proposed routes to/from the site to ensure that there is adequate design to serve heavy vehicles that would include:
o A review of turning radii at intersections
o Review of the existing pavement quality on these routes o Coordination with City staff to verify that the pavement was constructed to support the increase in heavy vehicles
o A review to minimize the conflicts between heavy vehicles and vulnerable roadway users (maximize separation between heavy vehicles and bicycles/pedestrians)

o Review of other geometrics (horizontal and vertical clearances) to ensure routes can serve the development
• All project -level improvements shall be the responsibility of the project sponsor to implement. Special considerations will be made through coordination with City staff for any improvement that has monies already collected for it through other funding mechanisms (like TUMF or the City's DIF program). Please note that the City's goal is to implement improvements prior to them being needed by the project (e.g. concurrency of improvements with issuance of occupancy permits) and the traffic study should clearly identify who is responsible for the improvement along with when it is needed to form the basis of conditioning the project
• TIA must prepare a Trip distribution (%) and assignment (trip count assignment) The proposed TIA Guidelines have been designed to comply with the CEQA Guidelines expectations and build on the information prepared for WRCOG's Implementation Pathway Study.

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed TIA Guidelines. A General Plan amendment will be required to match the TIA Guidance LOS and will be brought to City Council at a future meeting.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this staff report and presentation is estimated at $1,500.

The cost for Fehr and Peers to perform the required analysis and present the results is $41,000 and will be paid from the Public Works department's contractual services budget, GL Account 100-3100-7068-0000.

Recommended Action:

Approve the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines performed by Fehr and Peers, dated August 2024, and direct staff to develop an implementation and enforcement policy for future consideration.

Attachments:

A. TIA Guidelines
B. Presentation

BEAUMONT

C A L I F Q R N I A -
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the
City of Beaumont

FEHR'S'PEERS
Updated 07.18.2024

Table of Contents
Introduction 4
Preamble 5
Background Information 6
Guidelines Organization 6
Introduction 8
CEQA Changes 9
Need for Transportation Impact Analysis 11
Level of Service Assessment for General Plan Consistency 15 Methodologies 16
Study Area Boundaries for LOS assessment 17
Analysis Scenarios 17
Data Collection, Project Trip Generation, and Forecasting Methodologies 18 Intersection General Plan Consistency Requirements 20
Roadway Segment General Plan Consistency Requirements 22 Site Access, Safety, and Other Analyses 22
Improvements for Transportation Impacts 23
CEQA Assessment - VMT Analysis 25
Analysis Methodology 26
CEQA VMT Impact Thresholds 30
VMT Mitigation Measures 31
CEQA Assessment - Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis 32 Transportation Impact Study Format 34
Attachments 37
Project Scoping Form 38
Detailed VMT Forecasting Information 41
2

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 06.21.2024
Introduction

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Preamble
The City of Beaumont adopted vehicle miles of travel significance thresholds and level of service (LOS) guidelines through Council Resolution No. 2020-20 which was adopted on June 16, 2020.

Since that time, the City has completed a Council Action Plan and has expressed concerns related to LOS in particular. Additionally, Fehr & Peers provided an LOS informational presentation to council on March 5, 2024.

Furthermore, the City has seen a lot of development activity in the southwest part of the City. This development activity is generally for warehouse development at a scale that was not anticipated when the City completed the General Plan Update. These warehouse development projects are also being constructed on speculation — meaning that no specific tenant has been identified — which decreases the confidence in the trip generation estimates for those projects. This is compounded by the fact that trip rates for warehouses vary a lot —1.71 trips per KSF per day for a warehouse vs.

6.44 trips per ksf per day for a high -cube fulfillment center (sort) — which could lead to underestimation of trip generation for these facilities.

Given the above, the City has decided that a differential LOS policy — requiring less congestion in this area of the city compared to the rest of the city — has merit and that the traffic study guidelines should be modified accordingly.

Finally, SB 743 has been in -place for four years in the City. These guidelines also reflect any small changes to the VMT guidance based on experience gained by City staff during that time.

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Background Information
SB 743, signed by the Governor in 201.3, is changing the way transportation impacts are identified.

Specifically, the legislation has directed the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to look at different metrics for identifying transportation as a CEQA impact. The Final OPR guidelines were released in December 2018 and identified vehicle miles of travel (VMT) as the preferred metric moving forward. The Natural Resources Agency completed the rule making process to modify the CEQA guidelines in December of 2018.

In anticipation of the change to VMT, WRCOG completed a SB 743 Implementation Pathway Study in 2019 to assist their member organizations with answering important implementation questions about the methodology, thresholds, and mitigation approaches for VMT impact analysis. The WRCOG study can be accessed on-line ( http://www.fehrandpeers.com/wrcog-sb743/) and includes the following main components.
• Thresholds Evaluation Memorandum — Potential thresholds WRCOG agencies could consider when establishing thresholds of significance for VMT assessment • Methodologies and Calculations Memorandum — Types of VMT that could be considered for impact assessment
• Tools Evaluation Memorandum — Types of tools that could be used to estimate VMT and the pros/cons associated with each tool
• Mitigation Memorandum — Types of mitigation that can be considered for VMT mitigation • VMT Screening Tool — An on-line GIS tool that can be used for VMT screening All WRCOG agencies can utilize the information produced through the Implementation Pathway Study to adopt their own methodology and significance thresholds for use in CEQA compliance.

As noted in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(b) below, lead agencies are encouraged to formally adopt their significance thresholds and this is key part of the SB 743 implementation process. (b) Each public agency is encouraged to develop and publish thresholds of significance that the agency uses in the determination of the significance of environmental effects. Thresholds of significance to be adopted for general use as part of the lead agency's environmental review process must be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation, and developed through a public review process and be supported by substantial evidence. Lead agencies may also use thresholds on a case -by -case basis as provided in Section 15064(b)(2).

The City has completed this process as noted above, having adopted a threshold of significance by resolution in 2020.

Guidelines Organization
The remainder of this guidelines document is organized as follows.

1. Introduction

2. Need for Transportation Impact Study

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024

3. LOS Assessment for General Plan Consistency

4. CEQA Assessment - VMT Analysis

5. CEQA Assessment - Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis

6. Transportation Impact Analysis Format

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Introduction

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
One of the fundamental roles of government agencies is the construction and maintenance of public infrastructure facilities including roadways, rail and bus facilities, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, stormwater treatment facilities, parks, and other public facilities.

When private development occurs, it is the responsibility of government to ensure that there are adequate public facilities to serve increment population and employment growth. For the transportation system, one way to address this issue is the preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA).

For the past several decades, the preparation of a TIA was integrated into the CEQA process, in which the TIA was used primarily to analyze a project's impacts under CEQA. However; with the passage of SB 743, changes to the TIA process are necessary. Specifically, a TIA may be need as a stand-alone document which is a requirement of project approval and will include information for the decision makers that is not required as part of the CEQA process.

The purpose of Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines is to provide general instructions for analyzing the potential transportation impacts of proposed development projects (e.g., general plan Amendments and zoning changes). These guidelines present the recommended format and methodology that should generally be utilized in the preparation of TIAs. These recommendations are based on Riverside County's most recent TIA Guidelines from April 2008 with updates to comply with the state of the practice advances and new California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) expectations prompted by Senate Bill 743 (SB 743). These recommendations are general guidelines and the City of Beaumont has the discretion to modify the TIA requirements based on the unique characteristics of a particular project.

To avoid unnecessary delays or revisions and to streamline the TIA preparation and review process, Beaumont requires that the applicant submit and have approved a scoping form prior to the preparation and submittal of a draft TIA. A version of the scoping form is attached to this document and includes a process for both LOS assessment and VMT assessment.

CEQA Changes
A key element of SB 743 is the elimination of auto delay, level of service (LOS), and other similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant impacts.

This change is intended to assist in balancing the needs of congestion management with statewide goals related to infill development, promotion of public health through active transportation, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

SB 743 contains amendments to current congestion management law that allows cities and counties to effectively opt -out of the LOS standards that would otherwise apply in areas where Congestion Management Plans (CMPs) are still used (including Riverside County). Further, SB 743 required the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to update the CEQA Guidelines and establish criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts. In December 2018, OPR

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
released their final recommended guidelines based on feedback with the public, public agencies, and various organizations and individuals. OPR recommended Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the most appropriate measure of project transportation impacts for land use projects and land use plans. For transportation projects, lead agencies may select their own preferred metric but must support their decision with substantial evidence that complies with CEQA expectations. SB 743 does not prevent a city or county from continuing to analyze delay or LOS outside of CEQA review for other transportation planning or analysis purposes (i.e., general plans, impact fee programs, corridor studies, congestion mitigation, or ongoing network monitoring); but these metrics may no longer constitute the sole basis for CEQA impacts.

These updated TIA Guidelines have been designed to comply with the CEQA Guidelines expectations and build on the information prepared for WRCOG's Implementation Pathway Study.

il
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Need for Transportation
Impact Analysis
11

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
The need for a TIA may stem from CEQA compliance, general plan consistency, or both.

Discretionary actions of public agencies all trigger CEQA review, but whether a TIA is required depends on the findings of the City of Beaumont's initial study and the potential for the project to cause a significant impact. General plan consistency is required for all discretionary actions as well but Beaumont has discretion as to how consistency is determined.

Need to Complete LOS as part of the 1 in nnaiysis
The following activities generally will not require a TIA that includes LOS analysis. This presumption is based on the activities associated with the project (e.g. they are local serving) or the limited trip generation of the project (e.g. projects that generate less than 100 peak hour trips as they typically do not affect LOS significantly once distributed to the local roadway network). • All residential parcel maps
• Single family residential tracts of less than 100 lots • Apartments and multi -family projects of less than 150 units • Plot plan and uses cases for projects of one acre or less • Preschools, local serving elementary schools and local serving middle schools • Local serving churches, lodges, community centers, neighborhood parks and community parks
• Mini storage yards
• Congregate care facilities that contain significant special services, such as medical facilities, dining facilities, recreation facilities and support retail services • Any use which can demonstrate trip generation of less than 100 vehicle trips in the peak hour.

Beaumont reserves the right to require an applicant to prepare additional traffic analysis based on:
• Presence of an existing or potential safety problem
• Location of the development in an environmentally or otherwise sensitive area, or in an area that is likely to generate public controversy
• Presence of a nearby substandard intersection or street • Need for a focused study for access/operational issues • Request from an affected agency, such as Caltrans or adjacent City; if the request is deemed reasonable and appropriate
Need to complete VMT as part of the TIA Analysis
The following activities generally will not require a TIA that includes VMT. This presumption is based on the substantial evidence provided in the OPR Technical Advisory supporting SB 743 implementation or is related to projects that are local serving which, by definition, would decrease

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
the number of trips or the distance those trips travel to access the development (and are VMT- reducing projects).
• Projects located in a Transit Priority Areas (TPA) (as defined later in this guidance) • Projects located in a low-VMT generating area (as defined later in this guidance) • Local -serving K-12 schools
• Local parks
• Day care centers
• Local -serving gas stations
• Local -serving banks
• Local -serving hotels (e.g. non -destination hotels)
• Student housing projects
• Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the

RTP/SCS
• Infill affordable housing projects
• Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips' o This generally corresponds to the following "typical" development potentials:
• 11 single family housing units
• 16 multi -family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units • 10,000 sq. ft. of office
• 15,000 sq. ft. of light industrial2
• 63,000 sq. ft. of warehousing'
• 79,000 sq. ft. of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse' 1 This threshold ties directly to the OPR technical advisory and notes that CEQA provides a categorical exemption for existing facilities, including additions to existing structures of up to 10,000 square feet, so long as the project is in an area where public infrastructure is available to allow for maximum planned development and the project is not in an environmentally sensitive area. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15301, subd. (e)(2).) Typical project types for which trip generation increases relatively linearly with building footprint (i.e., general office building, single tenant office building, office park, and business park) generate or attract an additional 110-124 trips per 10,000 square feet. Therefore, absent substantial evidence otherwise, it is reasonable to conclude that the addition of 110 or fewer trips could be considered not to lead to a significant impact.
2 Threshold may be higher depending on the tenant and the use of the site. This number was estimated using rates from ITE's Trip Generation Manual.

Coordination with Beaumont
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
To streamline the TIA preparation and review process, the TIA preparer shall solicit input and approval for the City prior to the preparation and submittal of a draft TIA document. A TIA "Project Scoping Form", attached, shall be prepared by the Engineer and submitted to the City for approval prior to the preparation of a draft TIA. The Project Scoping Form provides for agreement of the following key points before initiating the TIA.
• Determination of study area, intersections, and roadway links to be analyzed. • Project trip generation, distribution, and assignment. • Presentation of screening criteria used to screen the project from VMT assessment or proposed methodology/metrics that will be applied to estimate VMT. • Use of other approved projects for background traffic, traffic growth assumptions, or integration with the RIVCOM travel demand model.
• Coordination with adjacent agencies.
• For projects within one mile of a state highway, or any project that may add traffic on the state highway, the Engineer shall also coordinate with Caltrans.

il
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
level of Service Assessment
for General Plan Consistency

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Methodologies
The following LOS analysis is required to meet with general plan consistency requirements.

Intersections
The most recent version of the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board) should be utilized for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. The following parameters should be included in the analysis.
• Saturation Flow Rate consistent with field measurements or 1,900 passenger cars/hour/lane • Heavy Vehicle Factor based on count data or provided by the local agency; analyst may use a Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) conversion to reflect heavy vehicles in the volume or incorporate the heavy vehicle factor in the capacity calculation consistent with HCM requirements
• Grade based on existing or proposed grade of the facility • Minimum green time should be based on existing signal timings (timing sheets provided by the City, Caltrans, County, adjacent cities, or collected in the field) • Cycle lengths should be based on existing signal timings or measured in the field • Lost time should be based on existing signal timings or consistent with the recommendations from the HCM
• Peak hour factors should be based on count data; future peak hour factor should be 0.95 • Intersections must be evaluated with HCM-consistent software; for locations where closely spaced intersections occur or queues build over space and time (extending to upstream or downstream intersections), microsimulation should be utilized to accurately evaluate the intersections as a system. This may require inclusion of freeway facilities.

When developing mitigation, the following recommendations should be considered. • Exclusive left -turn lanes should be considered when peak hour volumes exceed 100 • Dual left -turn lanes should be considered when peak hour volumes exceed 300 • Protected left -turn phasing should be mandetory when the peak hour left turn volume exceeds 240 vehicles or when the left -turn crosses more than two through lanes or when the conflicting through volume may create potential safety concerns • The City supports use of protected/permissive phasing for streets that are four lanes or less, where there is good viability, and where speeds are not too high and should be recommended when appropriate
The City may require roadway segment evaluation in addition to intersection analysis. In those instances, roadway segment capacity should be based on capacities documented in Beaumont's General Plan EIR.
16

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Study Area Boundaries for LOS assessment
In general, the minimum area to be studied should include any intersection of "Collector" or higher classification street, with "Collector" or higher classification streets; at which the proposed project will add 50 or more peak hour trips. In general, the study area should not exceed a 5 -mile radius from the project site unless evidence is available to justify a larger area. Please note that the City may expand or contract the study area at their discretion.

Analysis Scenarios
The following study scenarios should be included for intersection capacity analysis:
a) Existing Conditions
b) Background Conditions — Defined as Opening Year Conditions with traffic from approved projects in the area (note, if there are no or limited approved projects in the area of the project, an ambient growth rate could be considered in lieu of assigning traffic from approved projects in the area)
c) Background Plus Project Conditions — Defined as background conditions plus traffic from the proposed project
d) Cumulative No Project Conditions — Defined as ambient growth to the Cumulative Horizon (typically coinciding with the forecast horizon of the RIVCOM travel demand forecasting model) that includes traffic from approved and pending projects in the area e) Cumulative Plus Project Conditions — Defined as Cumulative No Project Conditions plus traffic from the proposed project
Phased projects could be evaluated in three ways. First, the analyst can identify which phase of a project triggers a needed improvement based on the comparison of Background Conditions to Background Plus Project Conditions (this is the City's preferred this approach as it identifies a "threshold" of development that can occur before improvements are triggered). Alternatively, they can provide a phased assessment looking at the opening year of each phase. Finally, for large phased projects, the project as a whole could be evaluated initially; however, subsequent traffic studies would have to be completed for each proposed phase implementation to ensure that improvements are implemented when they are needed. The City should be consulted to identify which approach is most appropriate for a proposed project if phasing is proposed; however, the first option noted above is recommended for most phased projects.

Recommendations for developing Ambient Traffic and Cumulative Traffic are provided in the next section of this document.
17

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Data Collection, Project Trip Generation, and
Forecasting Methodologies
The following recommendations pertaining to traffic count collection, project trip development, and traffic forecasting methodologies have been developed to maintain consistency across different TIAs and reflect current state of the practice.

Traffic Counts
Data for existing traffic conditions should be collected for the project using the following guidelines. • Peak period turning movement counts at all study intersections, roadway segments (if required) and/or driveways, including bicycle and pedestrian counts at intersections with high non -automotive use, should be collected. For intersections with high percentages of heavy vehicles, turning movement counts should count heavy vehicles separately. • Average Daily Traffic (ADT) for all roadways within study area (if required) and vehicle classification counts in areas with a high percentage of heavy vehicle use. • Traffic counts should not be used if more than one year old without prior approval. • Traffic data should not be collected on weeks that include a holiday and non -school session time periods unless approved by the local agency.
• Traffic data should not be collected between Thanksgiving and the first week of the new year without prior approval.
• Traffic counts should be conducted on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, or Thursdays. • For congested conditions, back of queue estimates by approach (and turning movement) should be conducted every 15 minutes.

Unless directed otherwise by the City, counts should be collected during the following time frames presuming the time period captures the beginning and end times of any congested conditions. • Morning (7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.)
• Afternoon/evening (4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.)
• Midday and "School -Release" peak hours — If directed by the City • Other peak hours, off-peak, weekend or special event, may also be required depending on the project location and type of use
Count data should be included in the study appendices.
18

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Trip Generation
Local trip generation surveys should be conducted for at least three similar project sites following the methodology contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook. If locally valid trip generation surveys cannot be conducted, then use of the ITE trip generation rates is allowed but limitations of the data should be fully disclosed especially related to land use context. Trip generation for high truck generating uses such as high cube warehouses, logistics space, etc. shall be determined with local agency input on a case -by -case basis and may utilize survey information prepared by WRCOG for some of these uses. The proposed trip generation should be listed in the scoping form for review and approval prior to study initiation.

Trip internalization for mixed use developments (if applicable) should be calculated using state of the practice methodologies. At the time these guidelines were developed, the EPA's mixed -use trip generation (or MXD) methodology or ITE's mixed use trip generation method are the state of the practice and should be approved by the local agency prior to use in any studies. Trip internalization calculations (including gross trips, net trips after internalization, and MXD input assumptions (such as intersection density, TOD assumptions, acres, etc.)) should be documented in the TIA.

For projects that anticipate the generation of significant truck traffic, all truck trips should be converted into passenger car equivalents (PCE) for the capacity analysis or the analyst should adjust the heavy vehicle percentage in the capacity assessment appropriately. PCE conversions should utilize either information from WRCOG (preferred) if the land use is consistent with those studies or should be developed using other data sources that are appropriate for estimating PCE conversion rates.

Trip Distribution
The project's trip distribution should be based on expected origin -destination patterns related to the project's land uses. Preferred methods include the use of mobile device data measuring trip distribution for similar sites or land uses (a minimum of three locations) and select zone assignments from RIVCOM. Other data may be used to help refine trip distribution patterns including the relative location of population, commercial, recreational and employment centers; existing peak hour link and turning movement volumes; ADT volumes; proximity to regional transportation corridors; and knowledge of local and regional traffic circulation. A preliminary trip distribution pattern map should be submitted in the scoping form for review and approval by the City.

The trip distribution may be further refined, after consultation with the City, based on consideration of following factors:
• Type of proposed development
• Location and intensity of development
• Conditions on the roadway network in the vicinity

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
• Similar land use in the vicinity
• Truck route system
• As directed by the City
Trip Forecasts
For Cumulative Conditions, the adopted Riverside County Travel Demand Model (RIVCOM) should be used to develop future traffic volume forecasts for the cumulative horizon year. Prior to running the model, the Traffic Study preparer should review the land use growth allocations in the study area to verify that the allocations are representative of the available land supply created by previously approved projects, the general plan, and applicable zoning.

Intersection General Plan Consistency
Requirements
Consistent with the acceptable LOS outlined in the City's General Plan, Council Priority Actions, and recent council presentations, the local agency considers the following criteria for application in a traffic study to identify infrastructure improvements required to provide acceptable operations.

Please note that this analysis will be completed to demonstrate general plan/City policy consistency.

Specific CEQA thresholds, which are based on VMT requirements, are described later in these guidelines and shall be the sole basis for determining CEQA-related impacts.

Signalized Intersection Operating Requirements
• Any signalized study intersection operating at an acceptable LOS without project traffic in which the addition of project traffic causes the intersection to degrade to an unacceptable LOS shall identify improvements to improve operations back to acceptable. • Any signalized study intersection that is operating unacceptably without project traffic where the project increases delay by 5.0 or more seconds shall identify improvements to offset the increase in delay.

The City defines acceptable LOS as noted below:
• LOS C for any study facility located on or west of Pennsylvania Avenue AND south of 1-10 (e.g. LOS C for the southwest portion of the City) • LOS D at all other locations in the City
20

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
At AL
Unsignalized Intersection General Plan Consistency
Requirements
An operational improvement would be required if the study determines that either section a) or both sections b) and c) occur:
a) The addition of project related traffic causes the intersection to degrade from an acceptable LOS to an unacceptable LOS (see definition above related to what the City defines as acceptable).

OR
b) The project adds 5.0 seconds or more of delay to an intersection that is already projected to operate without project traffic at an unacceptable LOS, AND
c) The intersection meets the peak hour traffic signal warrant after the addition of project traffic.

If the conditions above are satisfied, improvements should be identified that achieve the following:
• An acceptable LOS for case a) above or to pre -project LOS and delay for case b) above.

Industrial and Warehousing Considerations
For developments that will generate significant heavy vehicle volumes (more than 50 heavy vehicles per day), the analysis must also include the following assessment:
• Detailed review of all proposed routes to/from the site to ensure that there is adequate design to serve heavy vehicles that would include:
o A review of turning radii at intersections
o Review of the existing pavement quality on these routes o Coordination with City staff to verify that the pavement was constructed to support the increase in heavy vehicles
o A review to minimize the conflicts between heavy vehicles and vulnerable roadway users (maximize separation between heavy vehicles and bicycles/pedestrians) o Review of other geometrics (horizontal and vertical clearances) to ensure routes can serve the development
21

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Roadway Segment General Plan Consistency
Requirements
Intersections typically provide the transportation constraint on vehicle capacity. As such, these guidelines focus on the evaluation of intersections. However, in some instances, roadway segment evaluation could be appropriate and may be requested by the City.

Consistent with the acceptable LOS for the City, the following roadway segment requirements should be considered and improvements recommended if the project exceeds the noted operational goals:
• Any study roadway segment operating at an acceptable LOS without project traffic in which the addition of project traffic causes the segment to degrade to an unacceptable LOS should identify improvements to achieve an acceptable LOS. • Any roadway segment that operates unacceptably in the no project scenario where the project adds traffic in excess of 5% of the roadway capacity (e.g. a volume -to -capacity ratio increase of 0.05) should identify improvements to add capacity to the segment.

Site Access, Safety, and Other Analyses
A project's TIA must analyze site access and safety around the project and on adjacent streets. The recommended analyses are summarized below.

Site Access Analysis
The following analyses are required to improve the project access circulation and to limit driveways and local street access on arterial streets:
a) Intersection Sight Distance — All on -site intersections, project access driveways or streets to public roadways should provide adequate sight distance. Adequate intersection sight distance should be determined using the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. b) Driveway Length and Gated Entrance — Primary project driveways should have a throat of sufficient length to allow vehicles to enter the project area without causing subsequent vehicles to back out onto the public street system.
c) Limit Driveway Impacts — Driveways and local streets access on arterial streets should be limited to minimize the impacts on arterial streets. Driveways should be located to maintain a reasonable distance from an adjacent intersection and/or driveway. Whenever possible, driveways should be consolidated with adjacent properties. 22

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
d) Corner Clearance — A driveway should be a sufficient distance from a signalized intersection so that right -turn egress movements do not interfere with the right -turn queue at the intersection. In addition, every effort should be made to provide right -turn egress movements with sufficient distance to enter the left -turn pocket at the adjacent intersection.
e) Right Turn Lanes at Driveways — If the project right turn peak hour volume is 50 or more vehicles, a right -turn deceleration lane should be reviewed for appropriateness on all driveways accessing major arterial and secondary streets. The length of right turn lane should be sufficient to allow a vehicle traveling at the posted speed to decelerate before entering the driveway as outlined in the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. f) Adequacy of pedestrian facilities to/from the project site providing convenient and direct access for those users.
g) Bicycle accessibility from nearby bike routes to the project site. h) Accessibility from adjacent transit stops to/from the project site providing convenient and direct access for those users.
(rattle Signal Warrant Analysis
A peak hour traffic signal warrant analysis should be performed for all unsignalized study intersections for the project opening year (if applicable) and build -out year conditions. The signal warrant analysis should be performed using the latest edition of the California MUTCD. The warrant analysis should be included in the study appendices.

In determining the location of a new traffic signal on an arterial street or approaching an arterial street, traffic progression and simulation analysis may be required using Synchro/SimTraffic software or equivalent at the direction of the City.

Improvements for Transportation Impacts
As part of the final acceptance of a TIA, the City will review and approve any required improvements and/or fair share contributions necessary to improve the transportation -related deficiencies caused by the proposed development. These should be included as part of the conditions of approval and should be in addition to any improvements required by any other departments. Any transportation improvements based on a transportation study will be in addition to any other fees related to the existing fee programs (unless the needed improvement is already included in an existing fee program (such as TUMF).

Fair share contributions identified in the TIA and subsequently listed in the conditions of approval shall be required before a building permit will be issued. Improvements required in a TIA and subsequently listed in the conditions of approval shall be completed prior to occupancy. 23

Level of Service Improvements
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Improvements for project level improvements should focus on providing operations that offset the project impact (e.g. achieve a "no project" level of service). Improvements could consist of signal timing improvements, lane restriping, or new lanes to study facilities. All project -level improvements shall be the responsibility of the project sponsor to implement. Special considerations will be made through coordination with City staff for any improvement that has monies already collected for it through other funding mechanisms (like TUMF or the City's DIF program). Please note that the City's goal is to implement improvements prior to them being needed by the project (e.g. concurrency of improvements with issuance of occupancy permits) and the traffic study should clearly identify who is responsible for the improvement along with when it is needed to form the basis of conditioning the project.

Cumulative deficiencies should include a fair -share contribution toward achieving acceptable levels of service as noted below. Alternatively, if a cumulative location is included in an existing traffic impact fee program (such as TUMF), payment of those fees would constitute an appropriate contribution.

Finally, the project applicant could revisit the project description in an effort to reduce the project impacts if viable.

For improvements that are needed where the applicant is not solely responsible, a fair share computation should be computed and reported for each such mitigation. The fair share amount should be calculated using the following formula:
project trips
Fair share =
project trips + future development trips
Trips noted above should correspond to the peak hour where the deficiency occurs for intersection assessment or daily trips for roadway segment impacts. If a project degrades operations during both peak hours, then the analysis should identify the peak hour for fair share assessment that has the highest project burden for fair share contribution.

il
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
CElIA Assessment - VMT
Analysis

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
A key element of SB 743, signed in 2013, is the elimination of automobile delay and LOS as the sole basis of determining CEQA impacts. The most recent CEQA guidelines, released in December 2018, recommend VMT as the most appropriate measure of project transportation impacts. However, SB 743 does not prevent a city or county from continuing to analyze delay or LOS as part of other plans (i.e., the general plan), studies, or ongoing network monitoring.

The following recommendations assist in determining VMT impact thresholds and mitigation requirements for various land use projects' TIAs.

Analysis Methodology
For purposes of SB 743 compliance, a VMT analysis should be conducted for land use projects as deemed necessary by the Traffic Division and would apply to projects that have the potential to increase the average VMT per unit of measurement compared to the City's average baseline VMT per unit of measurement. Normalizing VMT per person, employee, or service population essentially provides a transportation efficiency metric that the analysis is based on. Using this efficiency metric allows the user to compare the project to the remainder of the unincorporated area for purposes of identifying transportation impacts.

These guidelines are based on the WRCOG Implementation Pathway Study which provides options for both methodologies and VMT screening. The methodologies and significance thresholds presented below are based on WRCOG recommendations from the Implementation Pathway Study; lead agencies may wish to modify these thresholds with alternative thresholds of significance and methodologies as appropriate. Additional information related to the Implementation Pathway Study can be found at https://www.fehrandpeers.com/wrcog-sb743/ .

Project Screening
There are three types of screening that lead agencies can apply to effectively screen projects from project -level assessment. These screening steps are summarized below:

Step 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
Projects located within a TPA' may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. This presumption may NOT be appropriate if the project:
3 A TPA is defined as a half mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high quality transit corridor per the definitions below.

Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 - 'Major transit stop' means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus 26

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024

1. Has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75;

2. Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the project to supply parking);

3. Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as determined by the City but generally would require growth of the project to be inconsistent with the land use projections contained within the RIVCOM model); or

4. Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high -income residential units.

Step 2: Low VMT Area Screening
Residential and office projects located within a low VMT-generating area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. In addition, other employment -related and mixed -use land use projects may qualify for the use of screening if the project can reasonably be expected to generate VMT per resident, per worker, or per service population that is similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area.

For this screening in the WRCOG area, the RIVCOM travel forecasting model was used to measure VMT performance for individual jurisdictions and for individual traffic analysis zones (TAZs). TAZs are geographic polygons similar to Census block groups used to represent areas of homogenous travel behavior. Total daily VMT per service population (population plus employment) was estimated for each TAZ. This presumption may not be appropriate if the project land uses would alter the existing built environment in such a way as to increase the rate or length of vehicle trips.

To identify if the project is in a low VMT-generating area, the analyst may review the WRCOG screening tool and apply the appropriate threshold (identified later in this chapter) within the tool.

Additionally, as noted above, the analyst must identify if the project is consistent with the existing land use within that TAZ and use professional judgement that there is nothing unique about the project that would otherwise be mis-represented utilizing the data from the travel demand model.

The WRCOG screening tool can be accessed at the following location:
http://gis.fehrandpeers.com/WRCOGVMT/
Step 3: Project Type Screening
routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.

Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 - For purposes of this section, a 'high -quality transit corridor' means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.
27

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Local serving retail projects less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing vehicle travel.

In addition to local serving retail, the following uses can also be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary as their uses are local serving in nature:
• Local -serving K-12 schools
• Local parks
• Day care centers
• Local -serving gas stations
• Local -serving banks
• Local -serving hotels (e.g. non -destination hotels)
• Student housing projects
• Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the

RTP/SCS
• Affordable housing projects
• Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips4 o This generally corresponds to the following "typical" development potentials:
■ 11 single family housing units
■ 16 multi -family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units ■ 10,000 sq. ft. of office
■ 15,000 sq. ft. of light industrials
■ 63,000 sq. ft. of warehousing?
■ 79,000 sq. ft. of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse? 4 This threshold ties directly to the OPR technical advisory and notes that CEQA provides a categorical exemption for existing facilities, including additions to existing structures of up to 10,000 square feet, so long as the project is in an area where public infrastructure is available to allow for maximum planned development and the project is not in an environmentally sensitive area. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15301, subd. (e)(2).) Typical project types for which trip generation increases relatively linearly with building footprint (i.e., general office building, single tenant office building, office park, and business park) generate or attract an additional 110-124 trips per 10,000 square feet. Therefore, absent substantial evidence otherwise, it is reasonable to conclude that the addition of 110 or fewer trips could be considered not to lead to a significant impact.
5 Threshold may be higher depending on the tenant and the use of the site. This number was estimated using rates from ITE's Trip Generation Manual.
28

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
d di
VMT Assessment for Non -Screened Development
Projects not screened through the steps above should complete VMT analysis and forecasting through the RIVCOM model (once complete) model to determine if they have a significant VMT impact. This analysis should include 'project generated VMT' and 'project effect on VMT' estimates for the project TAZ (or TAZs) under the following scenarios:
• Baseline conditions - This data is already available in the web screening map. • Baseline plus project for the project - The project land use would be added to a separate TAZ that would be created to contain the project land uses. A full base year model run would be performed and VMT changes would be isolated for the project TAZ and across the full model network. The model output must include reasonableness checks of the production and attraction balancing to ensure the project effect is accurately captured. If this scenario results in a less -than -significant impact, then additional cumulative scenario analysis may not be required (more information about this outcome can be found in the Thresholds Evaluation discussion later in this chapter). • Cumulative no project - This data is available from WRCOG. • Cumulative plus project - The project land use would be added to a separate TAZ that would be created to contain the project land uses. The addition of project land uses should be accompanied by a reallocation of a similar amount of land use from other TAZs; especially if the proposed project is significant in size such that it would change other future developments. Land use projects will generally not change the cumulative no project control totals for population and employment growth. Instead, they will influence the land use supply through changes in general plan land use designations and zoning. If project land uses are simply added to the cumulative no project scenario, then the analysis should reflect this limitation in the methodology and acknowledge that the analysis may overestimate the project's effect on VMT.

The model output should include total VMT, which includes all vehicle trips and trip purposes, and VMT per "unit of measurement". For most projects, it is recommended that the origin -destination method be used to estimate project -generated VMT and the unit of measurement would be service population; however, for some uses that are homogeneous (like a warehouse, office, or residential neighborhood), the VMT analysis could utilize the projection -attraction and the unit of measurement would be employees or residents. Total VMT (by speed bin) is needed as an input for air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG), and energy impact analysis while total VMT per unit of measurement is recommended for transportation impact analysis.

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Both "plus project" scenarios noted above will summarize two types of VMT: (1) project generated VMT per unit of measurement and comparing it back to the appropriate benchmark noted in the thresholds of significance, and (2) the project effect on VMT, comparing how the project changes VMT on the network looking at Citywide6 VMT per service population or a subregional VMT per service population and comparing it to the no project condition.

Project -generated VMT shall be extracted from the travel demand forecasting model using the origin -destination trip matrix (or production -attraction trip matrix if appropriate as noted above) and shall multiply that matrix by the final assignment skims. The project -effect on VMT shall be estimated using a subregional boundary (such as a City limit or WRCOG TUMF Zone boundary) and extracting the total link -level VMT for both the no project and with project condition.

A detailed description of this process is attached to these guidelines.

CEQA Impact Thresholds
VMT Impacts
An example of how VMT thresholds would be applied to determine potential VMT impacts is provided below.

A project would result in a significant project -generated VMT impact if either of the following conditions are satisfied:

1. The baseline project -generated VMT per unit of measurement exceeds the City's current average VMT per service population (note, for more efficient cities in the WRCOG region, or

2. The cumulative project -generated VMT per unit of measurement exceeds the City's baseline VMT per service population.

The project's effect on VMT would be considered significant if it resulted in either of the following conditions to be satisfied:

1. The baseline link -level boundary VMT per service population (City or subregional boundary) to increase under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition), or

2. The cumulative link -level boundary VMT per service population (City or subregional boundary) to increase under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition).
6 Note that, for projects near the boundary of the City, using the City boundary may not be appropriate as the influence area would be truncated. In that instance, an alternative boundary should be utilized and supported through substantial evidence.
30

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Please note that the cumulative no project shall reflect the adopted RTP/SCS; as such, if a project is consistent with the regional RTP/SCS, then the cumulative impacts shall be considered less than significant subject to consideration of other substantial evidence.

Please note that, for roadway infrastructure projects, a VMT impact would occur if the following conditions occur:
• The project would increase Citywide VMT (or subregional VMT) compared to the VMT that would otherwise be generated by the City's defined General Plan Roadway network (e.g. roadway network expansion that would increase VMT compared to the City's General Plan network assumptions).

VMT Mitigation Measures
To mitigate VMT impacts, the following choices are available to the applicant:

1. Modify the project's built environment characteristics to reduce VMT generated by the project

2. Implement transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to reduce VMT generated by the project.

3. Participate in a VMT fee program and/or VMT mitigation exchange/banking program (if they exist) to reduce VMT from the project or other land uses to achieve acceptable levels As part of the WRCOG Implementation Pathway Study, key TDM measures that are appropriate to the region were identified and can be accessed at the following location, https://www.fehrandpeers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/TDM-Strategies-Evaluation.pdf Measures appropriate for most of the WRCOG region are summarized in Attachment B of the TDM Strategies Evaluation Memorandum. Evaluation of VMT reductions should be evaluated using state - of -the -practice methodologies recognizing that many of the TDM strategies are dependent on building tenant performance over time. As such, actual VMT reduction cannot be reliably predicted and monitoring may be necessary to gauge performance related to mitigation expectations. 31

il
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
CElIA Assessment - Active
Transportation and Public
Transit Analysis
32

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Potential impacts to public transit, pedestrian facilities and travel, and bicycle facilities and travel can be evaluated using the following criteria.
• A significant impact occurs if the project conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decreases the performance or safety of such facilities.

Therefore, the TIA should include analysis of a project to examine if it is inconsistent with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding active transportation or public transit facilities, or otherwise decreases the performance or safety of such facilities and make a determination as to whether it has the potential to conflict with existing or proposed facilities supporting these travel modes. 33

il r
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Transportation Impact Study
Format
3,1

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
The recommended TIA format is as follows:

1. Executive Summary
a. Table summarizing significant impacts and mitigation measures

2. Introduction
a. Purpose of the TIA and study objective
b. Project location and vicinity map (Exhibit)
c. Project size and description
d. Existing and proposed land use and zoning
e. Site plan and proposed project (Exhibit)
f. Proposed project opening year and analysis scenarios

3. Methodology and Impact Thresholds

4. Existing Conditions
a. Existing roadway network
b. Existing traffic control and intersection geometrics (Exhibit) c. Existing traffic volumes — AM and PM peak hour and ADT (Exhibit) d. Existing level of service (LOS) at intersections (Table) e. Existing bicycle facilities (Exhibit)
f. Existing transit facilities (Exhibit)
g. Existing pedestrian facilities

5. Project Traffic
a. Trip generation (Table)
b. Trip distribution (%) and assignment (trip count assignment) (Exhibit) c. Project peak hour turning movements and ADT (Exhibit)

6. Background Conditions (Opening Year) Analysis
a. No Project analysis
i. Committed (funded) roadway improvements
ii. Approved project trip generation (Table, if required) iii. Approved project trip assignment and distribution (Exhibit, if required) iv. Peak turning movement and ADT (Exhibit)
v. Intersection level of service (Table)
vi. Roadway segment level of service (Table)
b. Plus Project analysis
i. Plus Project peak turning movement and ADT (Exhibit) ii. Intersection level of service (Table)
iii. Roadway segment level of service (Table)

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
iv. Identification of intersection and roadway segment deficiencies

7. Cumulative Year Analysis
a. No Project analysis
i. Committed (funded) roadway improvements
ii. Pending projects and verification of how they are included in the travel demand forecasting model
iii. Cumulative Year peak turning movement and ADT (Exhibit) iv. Intersection level of service (Table)
v. Roadway segment level of service (Table)
b. Plus Project Analysis
i. Plus Project peak turning movement and ADT (Exhibit) ii. Intersection level of service (Table)
iii. Roadway segment level of service (Table)
iv. Identification of intersection and roadway segment deficiencies

8. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis

9. Site Access Analysis

10. Safety and Operation Improvement Analysis

11. Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis

12. Improvements and Recommendations
a. Proposed improvements at intersections
b. Proposed improvements at roadway segments
c. Recommended Improvements categorized by whether they are included in fee plan or not. (Identify if these improvements are included in an adopted fee program)

13. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
a. Project VMT per person/employee for all analysis scenarios b. Project effect on VMT for all analysis scenarios
c. Identification of VMT impacts
d. Proposed VMT Mitigation Measures

14. Appendix
a. Approved scope of work
b. Traffic counts
c. Intersection analysis worksheets
d. VMT and TDM calculations
e. VMT and TDM mitigation calculations
f. Signal warrant worksheets
36

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Attachments
37

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Project Scoping Form
This scoping form shall be submitted to Beaumont to assist in identifying infrastructure improvements that may be required to support traffic from the proposed project.

Project Identification:

Case Number:

Related Cases:

SP No.

EIR No.

GPA No.

CZ No.

Project Name:

Project Address:

Project Opening
Year:

Project
Description:

Name:

Address:

Telephone:

Fax/Email:

Consultant:

Developer:

Trip Generation Information:

Trip Generation Data Source:

Current General Plan Land Use: Proposed General Plan Land Use:

Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning:
38

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Existing Trip Generation
Proposed Trip Generation
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
AM Trips
PM Trips
Trip Internalization: ❑ Yes ❑ No ( % Trip Discount)
Pass -By Allowance: ❑ Yes ❑ No ( % Trip Discount)
Potential Screening Checks
Is your project screened from specific analyses (see Page 11 of the guidelines related to LOS assessment and Pages 24-26).

Is the project screened from LOS assessment? Yes
No
LOS screening justification (see Page 11 of the guidelines):

Is the project screened from VMT assessment? Yes
No
VMT screening justification (see Pages 24-26 of the guidelines):

Level of Service Scoping
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
• Proposed Trip Distribution (Attach Graphic for Detailed Distribution):

North
South
East
West
%
%
%
%
• Attach list of Approved and Pending Projects that need to be considered (provided by the City and adjacent agencies)
• Attach list of study intersections/roadway segments
• Attach site plan
• Not other specific items to be addressed:
o Site access
o On -site circulation
o Parking
o Consistency with Plans supporting Bikes/Peds/Transit
o Other
• Date of Traffic Counts
• Attach proposed analysis scenarios (years plus proposed forecasting approach) • Attach proposed phasing approach (if the project is phased) VMT Scoping
For projects that are not screened, identify the following:
• Travel Demand Forecasting Model Used
• Attach WRCOG Screening VMT Assessment output or describe why it is not appropriate for use
• Attach proposed Model Land Use Inputs and Assumed Conversion Factors (attach) 40

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
Detailed VMT Forecasting Information
Most trip -based models generate daily person trip -ends for each TAZ across various trip purposes (HBW, HBO, and NHB, for example) based on population, household, and employment variables.

This may create challenges for complying with the VMT guidance because trip generation is not directly tied to specific land use categories. The following methodology addresses this particular challenge among others.

Production and attraction trip -ends are separately calculated for each zone, and generally:
production trip -ends are generated by residential land uses and attraction trip -ends are generated by non-residential land uses. OPR's guidance addresses residential, office, and retail land uses.

Focusing on residential and office land uses, the first step to forecasting VMT requires translating the land use into model terms, the closest approximations are:
• Residential: home -based production trips
• Office: home -based work attraction trips
Note that this excludes all non -home -based trips including work -based other and other -based other trips.

The challenges with computing VMT for these two types of trips in a trip -based model are 1) production and attraction trip -ends are not distinguishable after the PA to OD conversion process and 2) trip purposes are not maintained after the mode choice step. For these reasons, it not possible to use the VMT results from the standard vehicle assignment (even using a select zone re- assignment). A separate post -process must be developed to re -estimate VMT for each zone that includes trip -end types and trip purposes. Two potential approaches to tackle this problem are described below.

Quick and Easy
This approach uses standard model output files and requires minimal custom calculations. It is based on a regional MPO trip -based model with peak (PK) and off-peak (OP) skims and person trip production -attraction (PA) matrices.
• Calculate custom vehicle trip PA matrices from PK and OP person trip matrices o Keep trip purposes and modes separate
o Use average vehicle occupancy rates for drive -alone and shared ride trips • Use the final congested drive -alone PK and OP skim matrices to estimate trip length between zones
• Multiply the skim matrices by vehicle trip matrices to estimate VMT • Sum the PK and OP results to estimate daily VMT and aggregate mode trip purpose and mode
• Calculate automobile VMT for individual TAZs using marginal totals:
41

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for the City of Beaumont Updated 07.18.2024
o Residential (home -based) - row total
o Office (home -based work) - column total
Detailed and Complicated
The quick and easy process described above simplifies the approach but does not account for different congestion patterns throughout the day (AM, MD, PM, and NT), the direction of travel (all productions are origins and all attractions are destinations), or the benefits of exclusive lanes (HOV or HOT lanes). This more detailed approach attempts to address these limitations and better estimate the VMT produced by the vehicle assignment model. • Re -skim final loaded congested networks for each mode and time period • Run a custom PA to OD process that replicates actual model steps, but:
o Keeps departure and return trips separate
o Keeps trip purpose and mode separate
o Converts person trips to vehicle trips based on auto occupancy rates and isolates automobile trips
o Factors vehicle trips into assignment time periods
• Multiply appropriate distance skim matrices by custom OD matrices to estimate VMT • Sum matrices by time period, mode, and trip purpose to calculate daily automobile VMT • Calculate automobile VMT for individual TAZs using marginal totals:
o Residential (home -based) - row of departure matrix plus column of return matrix o Office (home -based work) - column of departure matrix plus row of return matrix Appropriateness Check;
Regardless of which method is used, the number of vehicle trips from the custom PA to OD process and the total VMT should match as closely as possible with the results from the traditional model process. The estimated results should be checked against the results from a full model run to understand the degree of accuracy. Note that depending on how each model is setup, these custom processes may or may not include IX/XI trips, truck trips, or special generator trips (airport, seaport, stadium, etc.).

When calculating VMT for comparison at the study area, citywide, or regional geography, the same methodology that was used to estimate project -specific VMT should be used. The VMT for these comparisons can be easily calculated by aggregating the row or column totals for all zones that are within the desired geography.
42

Traffic Impact Study Guidelines
Jason D. Pack, P.E.

FEHR PEERS

01 02
03 Background
Proposed Changes
Council Input

FEHR PEERS
LOS
Defined in the General Plan
Level of service is a qualitative description of traffic flow based on several factors, such as speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Six levels are typically defined, ranging from LOS "A," representing completely free -flow conditions, to LOS "F," representing breakdown in flow resulting in stop -and -go conditions. LOS "E" represents operations at or near capacity and is an unstable level during which vehicles are operating with minimum space for maintaining uniform flow. As such, on key auto -priority corridors, it is important to improve those facilities to allow for freer movement of travel. However, in key areas of the City where retail, pedestrian, and bicycle travel are expected (such as the City's downtown core of Beaumont Avenue and Sixth Street), slower travel is expected (improving safety) and free -flow travel is not desired.

MANAGE TRAFFIC
Goal .i Promote smooth tragic flows and balance operational , ien y, technological, and economic f a ibility.

Policies:
4,141 Reduce vehicular congestion on auto -priority streets to the greatest extent possible. 4,1,2 Maintain LOS D on all auto -priority streets in Beaumont. LOS E is considered acceptable on non -auto -priority streets.

4..L3 Identify key streets and intersections that will be exempt from the LOS threshold due to inadequate right-of-way, environmental constraints, or funding limitations.

FEHR''PEERS

What are Traffic Study Guidelines
✓When new development is proposed, they provide guidance to developers to ensure the following:
✓The project evaluates the project impacts as defined under CEQA - this primarily relates to vehicle miles of travel (VMT), consistency with existing and planned non -automotive
facilities, and safety.
✓LOS assessment to ensure that adequate capacity exists on the system to serve the proposed project
✓Consistency and predictability in the technical assessment

FEHR'S' PEERS

How the LOS Policy is Translated
into Current Guidelines
✓Maintain LOS D
✓Projects that degrade LOS below LOS D must improve the facility to achieve LOS D
FEHR �' PEERS

What We Heard and Have Observed
✓March 5t" council workshop - council concerned about congestion ✓Council Action Plan has also discussed addressing congestion ✓Development activity in the southwest part of the City is primarily warehouse development being constructed on speculation (no tenant identified). Land use at this scale was not completely contemplated in the General Plan.
✓Trip rates by tenant for warehouses/distribution centers can varry considerably (1.71 - 6.44 trips per KSF)

FEHR 'S' PEERS

Proposed Change
The City defines acceptable LOS as noted below:
▪ LOS C for any study facility located on or west of Pennsylvania Avenue AND south of 1-10 (e.g. LOS C for the southwest portion of the City) • LOS D at all other locations in the City
FEHR ` PEERS

41. FEHR) PEERS
Questions and Input
z ..

BAUME ONTA -C A L I F O R N I
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Robert L. Vestal, Public Works Director
DATE August 20, 2024
SUBJECT: Truck Route Study
Description Results of the Truck Routing Study and Recommended Improvements.

Background and Analysis:

On December 1, 2020, City Council adopted the 2040 General Plan, which describes the potential truck priority network to serve existing, planned, and future industrial development, as well as commercial uses. The General Plan provides conceptual routes and recommends formalizing truck routes following an analysis of truck access needs. Furthermore, the General Plan states, "The City should work toward designating certain streets throughout the City as truck routes. These routes should not overlap with bicycle facilities." It contains two goods movement policies:
• 4.6.1 Prioritize goods movement along specific routes in the City, consistent with the adopted layered network, to foster efficient freight logistics. • 4.6.2 Minimize or restrict heavy vehicle traffic near sensitive areas such as schools, parks, and neighborhoods.

On May 21, 2024, City Council received a presentation on the framework of the truck route analysis; subsequently, City Council provided direction to staff to prepare a Truck Route Study (Study), Attachment A.

The Study is pursuant to the General Plan and the May 21, 2024, City Council meeting.

The Study provides information about truck access, regulations, and land development associated with trucking operations. The intent of the analysis is to provide the City with sufficient information to codify local truck routes. In addition, pursuant to the discussion at the City Council meeting held on May 21, 2024, the Study also provides potential solutions to address the impacts of trucks parking in unauthorized or unwanted areas within and adjacent to the City.

The study's results include a proposed Truck Route Network and proposed improvements supporting the Truck Routes.

Truck Route Network
Existing and future land uses were analyzed with a focus on industrial uses, warehouses, distribution centers, and other freight -generating land uses. Land use information was collected from the adopted 2040 General Plan Update. Industrial and residential land uses have grown together over the years, and truck traffic has increased on almost all major roadways. The Study developed and implemented the following metrics:

Table 3. Truck Route Improvement Primary Metrics
Safety
Infrastructure Access
Community Impact
Goal: Avoid intersections
with heavy commute /
pedestrian /cyclist traffic
Metric: Number of bikes/
pedestrians and percentage
of trucks
Goal: Prioritize roadways
that provide the primary
access to heavy freight
generators
Metric: Yes/no
classification as Major
Arterial by the local
jurisdiction; yes/no as a
roadway that primarily
serves truck generators
Goal: Conformity with
Caltrans requirements for
California Legal trucks
CVC Section 35401
Metric: Yes/no match with
Caltrans requirements
Goal: Have sufficient
route and intersection
right of way, turning radii
and lane width to
accommodate WB-67
Metric: Yes/no
availability of California
Legal turning radius and
12 -foot lane width in
existing right-of-way
Goal: Provide connectivity
and continuity through
multiple jurisdictions
Metric: Ranking of
jurisdictional continuity and
access
Goal: Provide access to truck
parking/staging areas, and
existing or planned
commercial/ industrial zones
Metric: Relative access to
existing and future truck
generating land uses defined
in local General Plans
Goal: Avoid schools (or safe
routes to schools), hospitals,
parks, or other areas with
high pedestrian use
Metric: Proximity to sensitive
community uses
Goal: Avoid residential areas
Metric: Proximity to
residential land uses and land
zoned for residential uses
Note: Metrics that require additional data (e.g., ped/bike counts or truck parking inventories) have been assessed qualitatively.

Table 4. Truck Route Improvement Secondary Metrics
Operation
Infrastructure Land use
Safety
Goal: Align routes with local
jurisdiction plans
and studies
Metric: Yes/no alignment
with local jurisdiction plans
and studies
Goal: Prioritize routes with
good pavement conditions
and regular maintenance
Metric: Pavement
condition; maintenance
budgets and programs
Goal: Minimize impact to
adjacent residences
Metric(s): Housing density,
setbacks, existence of
sidewalks and bike lanes,
vegetative barriers, etc.

Goal: Minimize collisions
Metric: Number and
severity of truck -involved
accidents as percentage of
total traffic and truck trips

The recommended Truck Priority Network is presented below and reflects the metrics and analysis described in the Study.

City Boundery
— Truck Priority
-- Potential Roadway with Truck Priority
Truck Route Improvements
Fehr and Peers took the following steps to identify a list of recommended projects:

• Prepared a list of potential projects for short- and long-term improvements. • Evaluated all short-term projects for required infrastructure to accommodate trucks.
• Screened short-term projects based on right-of-way (ROW) requirements. • Classified short-term projects into three tiers: Tier 1 is low-cost and easy to implement (e.g., striping); Tier 2 is medium- to high -cost and somewhat more difficult to implement (e.g., reconstructing curbs, medians, may require multiple jurisdiction coordination and/or ROW acquisition (e.g., improvements to the intersection of SR 60 EB off -ramp, 1-10 WB on -ramp, and 6th Street). • Created a list of potential improvement projects located within the City of Beaumont and its sphere of influence (SOI).
• Long-term projects are included in the list as well. These projects may be needed due to future industrial/ logistics development projects.

Table 1 lists Tier 1 and Tier 2 projects.

Table 1. Truck Route Network Recommended Improvements
Item Recommendation - Main, Extents
Tier 1
T1.1 Pennsylvania Avenue from E 6th Street to Oak Valley Parkway California Avenue from 1St Street to 6th Street, and 6th Street from California Avenue and westbound 1-10 on -ramp
T1.3 6th Street from Pennsylvania Avenue and Highland Springs Avenue T1.4 N Highland Springs Avenue from 1-10 to Cherry Valley Boulevard T1.5 W 1St Street from Veile Avenue to Beaumont Avenue (Class II Bike Lane Relocation) T1.6 E Oak Valley Parkway between Beaumont Avenue and Cherry Avenue, and Cherry Avenue T12
Tier 2
T2.1 W 4th Street and Veile Avenue Intersection
T2.2 Luis Estrada Road from Veile Avenue to Beaumont Avenue T2.3 Luis Estrada Road and Beaumont Avenue Intersection T2.4 15t Street and Beaumont Avenue Intersection
T2.5 1St Street and Veile Avenue Roadway and Intersection T2.6 Oak Valley Parkway and Potrero Boulevard Intersection Upon approving the Truck Route Study, staff will develop an implementation and enforcement policy for future consideration by City Council. Additionally, staff will evaluate the recommended improvements and develop appropriate Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects. Staff will also work with new development projects that impact the Truck Route and condition the projects to construct associated improvements.