Agenda packet — Beaumont City Council, June 3, 2025 (part 13 of 13)

City of Beaumont
Technical Specifications

BEAUMONT
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
Traffic Signal Upgrades

27. Violations of any of the above Provisions or provisions of the referenced publications, unless promptly and completely corrected to the satisfaction of the Engineer, shall, at the sole discretion of the City, be grounds for termination of the Contract, or shut down or partial shutdown of the work, without compensation to the Contractor or permittee, or liability to the City, all as prescribed by contractual obligation or State law, whichever is applicable.

28. Contractor shall be responsible for the furnishing, installation, monitoring, operation, and maintenance of temporary off -site traffic and street improvements, at intersections along alternate routes during construction, as shown on the plans or modify the temporary offsite improvements at the direction of the Traffic Engineer.

EXCEPTION: Contractor may not work on a street that is in front of a school between the hours of 7:00 AM and 3:30 PM. Monday through Friday unless written authorization is given by the City Engineer. All streets abutting a school ground can only be worked on during weekends.

Measurement and Payment: Payment for Traffic Control shall be made at the contract unit price per Lump Sum for Traffic Control and shall include full compensation for all materials, labor, tools, equipment and incidentals for doing all the traffic control -related work per project specifications and as directed by the Engineer and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor.

TP15. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGN
The Contractor shall install a temporary construction sign at the project limits, as approved by the Engineer.

Project signs shall conform to the following requirements:
• Outside sign dimensions shall be 4' x 8'; material shall be 3/4" marine grade plywood substrate painted white both sides and edges, or approved equal, with 1" wide black border
• Printing shall be black, except city logo, using latex or eco solvent UV inhibited ink • City will provide "initial proof' layout in digital format. Contractor shall provide "final proof" layout for Public Works approval.
• Contractor shall provide photo of actual sign to city for approval prior to installation. • Contractor shall install signs at project site at locations approved by Engineer. • Sign shall be securely mounted on 2 - 4"x4" wood posts set 5'(min) into stable earth.

Sign shall be 18" (min) clear of vehicular and pedestrian travel ways. Bottom of sign shall be 7' (min) above finished grade.
• Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining sign in good condition, graffiti free, for the duration of the project and at the completion of the project shall remove the sign

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
18

Page 1578 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Technical Specifications

BEAUMONT
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
Traffic Signal Upgrades
and posts, restore area to pre-existing condition, and deliver sign to the Public Works Department.

At a minimum the sign contents shall include:
• "City of Beaumont Capital Improvement Project"
• "Traffic Signal Upgrade Project"
• completion date
• construction amount
• information contact phone number
• reference to the City w/ logo and Council members:

Measurement and Payment: Measurement and Payment for Temporary Construction Signs shall be included in the contract unit price per Lump Sum (LS) for Traffic Control and shall include full compensation for, but not limited to, furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, for doing all work involved and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor.

TP16. CONSTRUCTION SURVEY AND MONUMENT PRESERVATION
Construction Survey, Staking and Monument Preservation includes qualified personnel, equipment, and supplies required for, but not limited to Project control, grading, paving, tie out of all centerline monuments, replacement of disturbed monuments, and additional items included in the contract documents.

The Contractor shall employ engineers or surveyors to perform adequate surveys and staking necessary to construct the work to the proper lines and grades. Reconstructed asphalt concrete surfaces shall have a cross slope between 1.5% and 3.5%. New curb & gutter shall have a minimum slope of 0.5%. Grade breaks must be spaced a minimum of 25' apart and be no greater than 0.25%. Copies of the field notes, cut sheets or diagrams used in setting stakes shall be promptly furnished to the Engineer.

The Contractor will be responsible for providing pre- and post -construction corner records for the City to file with Riverside County.

Measurement and Payment: Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this section shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work involved and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor.

TP17. CONSTRUCTION WATER
The Contractor shall obtain construction water from Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District. Temporary construction water meters are available from the District. These meters will require the Developer/Contractor make application at the District offices and pay all the required deposits/fees.

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
19

Page 1579 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Technical Specifications

BEAUMONT
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
Traffic Signal Upgrades
Measurement and Payment: Full compensation for conforming to the requirements of this section shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the various contract items of work involved and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor.

TP18. GUARANTEE
In addition to guarantees required elsewhere, the contractor shall and hereby does guarantee all Work for a period of one (1) year after the date of acceptance of the Work by the City and shall repair and replace any and all such Work, together with any other work which may be displaced in so doing that may prove defective in workmanship and/or materials within the one (1) year period from the date of acceptance, without expense whatsoever to the City, ordinary wear and tear and usual abuse or neglect excepted. In the event of failure to comply with the above mentioned conditions within five (5) days after being notified in writing, the City is hereby authorized to proceed to have the defects repaired and made good at the expense of the Contractor, who shall pay the cost and charges therefore immediately upon demand.

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
20

Page 1580 of 1702 ends

C25-46

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT "B"
CONTRACTOR'S Bid
(Insert behind this page.)
15

Page 1581 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid

BEAUMONT

REVISED & NEGOTIATED
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
Traffic Signal Upgrades

BASE BID

BID SCHEDULE
R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
ITEM
NO.

DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS
EST.

QUANTITY/
UNIT

UNIT PRICE
(FIGURES)

TOTAL COST
(FIGURES)
1 Mobilization
1 LS
6067.00
6067.00
2 Traffic Control
1 LS
4500.00
4500.00
3 Best Management Practices,
SWPPP/WPCP and NPDES
Requirements
1 LS
1000.00
1000.00
4 Clearing and Grubbing
1 LS
500.00
500.00
5 Traffic Signal Improvements (Base Bid)
1 LS
164000.00
164000.00
PROJECT BASE BID SUBTOTAL:
176067.00
In case of discrepancy between the unit price and the item cost set forth for a unit basis item, the unit price shall prevail and. shall be utilized as the basis for determining the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. However, if the amount set forth as a unit price is ambiguous. unintelligible or uncertain for any cause. or is omitted, or is the same amount as the entry in the "Item Cost" column, then the amount set forth in the "Item Cost" column for the item shall prevail and shall be divided by the estimated quantity for the item and the price thus obtained shall be the unit price. Final payment shall be determined by the Engineer from measured quantities of work performed based upon the unit price.

In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

BID FORM
12

Page 1582 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
NAME OF BIDDER:

BEAUMONT
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
Traffic Signal Upgrades

REVISED & NEGOTIATED

BID FORM
PTM General Engineering Services Inc.

The undersigned, hereby declare that we have carefully examined the location of the proposed Work, and have read and examined the Contract Documents, including all plans, specifications, and all addenda, if any, for the following Project:

R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
We hereby propose to furnish all labor, materials, equipment, tools, transportation, and services. and to discharge all duties and obligations necessary and required to perform and complete the Project for the following ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 1 BID TOTAL BID PRICE:

ADDITIVE
ALTERNATE 1
BID
ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 1 BID PRICE
(IN WRITTEN FORM)

ADDITIVE
ALTERNATE 1 BID
PRICE
(IN NUMBERS)
TOTAL

BID PRICE
Post Bid Revision
Fifty One Thousand Dollars
51000.00
In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

BID FORM
13

Page 1583 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
Request for bid BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

REVISED & NEGOTIATED
ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 1 BID

BID SCHEDULE
R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
ITEM
NO.

DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS
EST.

QUANTITY/
UNIT

UNIT PRICE
(FIGURES)

TOTAL COST
(FIGURES)
6 Traffic Signal Improvements (Additive
Alternate 1)
1 LS
Post Bid Revis
51000.00
on
51000.00
PROJECT ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 1 BID SUBTOTAL:
51000.00
In case of discrepancy between the unit price and the item cost set forth for a unit basis item, the unit price shall prevail and, shall be utilized as the basis for determining the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. However, if the amount set forth as a unit price is ambiguous, unintelligible or uncertain for any cause, or is omitted, or is the same amount as the entry in the "Item Cost" column, then the amount set forth in the "Item Cost" column for the item shall prevail and shall be divided by the estimated quantity for the item and the price thus obtained shall be the unit price. Final payment shall be determined by the Engineer from measured quantities of work performed based upon the unit price.

In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

BID FORM
14

Page 1584 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
Request for bid BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

BID FORM

REVISED & NEGOTIATED
NAME OF BIDDER: PTM General Engineering Services, Inc.

R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
We hereby propose to furnish all labor. materials, equipment, tools. transportation. and services. and to discharge all duties and obligations necessary and required to perform and complete the Project for the following ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 2 BID TOTAL BID PRICE:

ADDITIVE
ALTERNATE 2
BID
ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 2 BID PRICE
(IN WRITTEN FORM)

ADDITIVE
ALTERNATE 2 BID
PRICE
(IN NUMBERS)
TOTAL

BID PRICE
Post bid revision excluding " new 352i ATC
related to.

Forty Seven Thousand Dollars
controller cabinet" and
47000.00
In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

BID FORM
15

Page 1585 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

REVISED & NEGOTIATED
ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 2 BID

BID SCHEDULE
R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
ITEM
NO.

DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS
EST.

QUANTITY/
UNIT

UNIT PRICE
(FIGURES)

TOTAL COST
(FIGURES)
6 Traffic Signal Improvements (Additive
Alternate 2)
1 LS
Post bid revision
ATC controller cabinet
L70Q0 00
exc uding "new
and relates
47000.00
PROJECT ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 2 BID SUBTOTAL:
47000.00
In case of discrepancy between the unit price and the item cost set forth for a unit basis item, the unit price shall prevail and, shall be utilized as the basis for determining the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. However, if the amount set forth as a unit price is ambiguous, unintelligible or uncertain for any cause, or is omitted, or is the same amount as the entry in the "Item Cost" column, then the amount set forth in the "Item Cost" column for the item shall prevail and shall be divided by the estimated quantity for the item and the price thus obtained shall be the unit price. Final payment shall be determined by the Engineer from measured quantities of work performed based upon the unit price.

In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

BID FORM
16

Page 1586 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
--..�.. R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

FORM WAS PRELIMINARY & NOT FINAL, REVISED FORM ALSO ATTACHED

BID FORM
NAME OF BIDDER: PTM General Engineering Services Inc.

The undersigned, hereby declare that we have carefully examined the location of the proposed Work and have read and examined the Contract Documents, including all plans, specifications, and all addenda, if any, for the following Project:

R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
We hereby propose to furnish all labor, materials, equipment, tools, transportation, and services, and to discharge all duties and obligations necessary and required to perform and complete the Project for the following BASE BID TOTAL BID PRICE:

BASE
BID

BASE BID PRICE
(IN WRITTEN FORM)

BASE BID PRICE
(IN NUMBERS)
TOTAL

BID PRICE
Ne isNreJ 'eve* x"si-Owsoliz1,
sixhi seven do//yr5.
ild 1 b61
In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

BID FORM
11

Page 1587 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

FORM WAS PRELIMINARY & NOT FINAL, REVISED FORM ALSO ATTACHED

BASE BID

BID SCHEDULE
R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
ITEM
NO.

DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS
EST.

QUANTITY/
UNIT

UNIT PRICE
(FIGURES)

TOTAL COST
(FIGURES)
1 Mobilization
1 LS
2 Traffic Control
1 LS
NA Soo,oa
y ,5a),0O
3 Best Management Practices,
SWPPP/WPCP and NPDES
Requirements
1 LS
Ikt2 Qn
1000.0 O
4 Clearing and Grubbing
1 LS
500,00
50©.00
5 Traffic Signal Improvements (Base Bid)
1 LS
164, 66(2,01
1 Pi,OOO, 00
PROJECT BASE BID SUBTOTAL:
144 , 0 7.0n
In case of discrepancy between the unit price and the item cost set forth for a unit basis item, the unit price shall prevail and, shall be utilized as the basis for determining the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. However, if the amount set forth as a unit price is ambiguous, unintelligible or uncertain for any cause, or is omitted, or is the same amount as the entry in the "Item Cost" column, then the amount set forth in the "Item Cost" column for the item shall prevail and shall be divided by the estimated quantity for the item and the price thus obtained shall be the unit price. Final payment shall be determined by the Engineer from measured quantities of work performed based upon the unit price.

In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

BID FORM
12

Page 1588 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
--�. R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

FORM WAS PRELIMINARY & NOT FINAL, REVISED FORM ALSO ATTACHED

BID FORM
NAME OF BIDDER: PTM General Engineering Services Inc.

ADDITIVE
ALTERNATE 1
BID
ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 1 BID PRICE
(IN WRITTEN FORM)
I`P

ADDITIVE
ALTERNATE 1 BID
PRICE
(IN NUMBERS)
TOTAL

BID PRICE
5i 04 4-41() 41100444
6 2 , 000. 06
In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

BID FORM
13

Page 1589 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid

BEAUMONT
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
Traffic Signal Upgrades

FORM WAS PRELIMINARY & NOT FINAL, REVISED FORM ALSO ATTACHED ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 1 BID

BID SCHEDULE
R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
ITEM
NO.

DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS
EST.

QUANTITY/
UNIT

UNIT PRICE
(FIGURES)

TOTAL COST
(FIGURES)
Traffic Signal Improvements (Additive6
Alternate 1)
1 LS
/
b2 ,o(96
�i y /000
PROJECT ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 1 BID SUBTOTAL:
4'-2 , °On
In case of discrepancy between the unit price and the item cost set forth for a unit basis item, the unit price shall prevail and, shall be utilized as the basis for determining the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. However, if the amount set forth as a unit price is ambiguous, unintelligible or uncertain for any cause, or is omitted, or is the same amount as the entry in the "Item Cost" column, then the amount set forth in the "'Item Cost" column for the item shall prevail and shall be divided by the estimated quantity for the item and the price thus obtained shall be the unit price. Final payment shall be determined by the Engineer from measured quantities of work performed based upon the unit price.

In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

BID FORM
14

Page 1590 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

FORM WAS PRELIMINARY & NOT FINAL, REVISED FORM ALSO ATTACHED

BID FORM
NAME OF BIDDER: PTM General Engineering Services Inc.

ADDITIVE
ALTERNATE 2
BID
ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 2 BID PRICE
(IN WRITTEN FORM)

ADDITIVE
ALTERNATE 2 BID
PRICE
(IN NUMBERS) 6
TOTAL

BID PRICE
el -1 s/5l - ovsond
86, 0OQ
In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

BID FORM
15

Page 1591 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
Request for bid BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

FORM WAS PRELIMINARY & NOT FINAL, REVISED FORM ALSO ATTACHED ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 2 BID

BID SCHEDULE
R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
ITEM
NO

DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS
EST.

QUANTITY/
UNIT

UNIT PRICE
(FIGURES)

TOTAL COST
(FIGURES)
6 Traffic Signal Improvements (Additive
Alternate 2)
1 LS
Bo, oofl
,%, do0
PROJECT ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 2 B D SUBTOTAL:
,gb, aa0
In case of discrepancy between the unit price and the item cost set forth for a unit basis item, the unit price shall prevail and, shall be utilized as the basis for determining the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. However, if the amount set forth as a unit price is ambiguous, unintelligible or uncertain for any cause, or is omitted, or is the same amount as the entry in the "Item Cost" column, then the amount set forth in the "Item Cost" column for the item shall prevail and shall be divided by the estimated quantity for the item and the price thus obtained shall be the unit price. Final payment shall be determined by the Engineer from measured quantities of work performed based upon the unit price.

In case of discrepancy between the written price and the numerical price, the written price shall prevail.

BID FORM
16

Page 1592 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

BID CERTIFICATION
Bidder certifies that it is licensed in accordance with the law providing for the registration of Contractors,
License No.

Expiration Date
Class of license
891265

02.28.27 Class A / C10
If the bidder is a joint venture, each member of the joint venture must include the above information.

The undersigned acknowledges receipt, understanding and full consideration of the following addenda to the Contract Documents:

1. Addenda No. thru

2. Attached is the required bid security in the amount of not less than 10% of the Total Bid Price.

3. Attached is the fully executed Non -Collusion Affidavit form.

4. Attached is the completed Designation of Subcontractors form.

5. Attached is the completed Bidder Information Form.

6. Attached is the completed Contractor's Certificate Regarding Workers' Compensation form.

Bidder acknowledges and understands that, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 20676, sellers of"mined material" must be on an approved list of sellers published pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 2717(b) in order to supply mined material for this Contract.

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that all of the information submitted in connection with this Bid and all of the representations made herein are true and correct.

Name of Bidder PTM Genf ral Engineering Services Inc.

Signature
Name and Title Elizabeth H. Mendoza - President / CFO
Dated 4.3.25

BID FORM
17

Page 1593 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
�-- R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING

WORKERS' COMPENSATION
R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract.

Name of Bidder PTM G eral Engineering Services Inc.

Signature
Name and Title
Dated
Elizabeth H. Mendoza - President / CFO

4.3.25 CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATE REGARDING

WORKERS' COMPENSATION
18

Page 1594 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

BID BOND
R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
The makers of this bond are,
PTM GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
as Principal, and

NATIQNWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
, as Surety
and are held and firmly bound unto the City of Beaumont, hereinafter called the City, in the penal sum of TEN PERCENT (10%) OF THE TOTAL BID PRICE of the Principal submitted to CITY for the work described below, for the payment of which sum in lawful money of the United States, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that whereas the Principal has submitted the accompanying bid dated APRIL 4TH , 2025, for R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
If the Principal does not withdraw its bid within the time specified in the Contract Documents; and if the Principal is awarded the Contract and provides all documents to the City as required by the Contract Documents; then this obligation shall be null and void. Otherwise, this bond will remain in full force and effect.

Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract Documents shall in affect its obligation under this bond, and Surety does hereby waive notice of any such changes.

In the event a lawsuit is brought upon this bond by the City and judgment is recovered, the Surety shall pay all litigation expenses incurred by the City in such suit, including reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs, expert witness fees and expenses.

BID BOND
19

Page 1595 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above -bound parties have executed this instrument under their several seals this 25TH day of MARCH , 2025, the name and corporate seal of each corporation.
(Corporate Seal)
(Corporate Seal)
Title
PTM GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Surety
By BRITTON CHRISTIANSEN, ATTORNEY -in -FACT

BRITTON CHRISTIANSEN
Attorney -in -Fact
(Attach Attorney -in -Fact Certificate) Title

BID BOND
20

Page 1596 of 1702 ends

ZOL L in L65 L
•
, f.,. 7
•r/ •
1 ' •
is

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

CITY OF )
On this day of in the year 2025, before me,
, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally
appeared , known to me to be the person
whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney -In -Fact of the (Surety) acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of the (Surety) thereto and his own name as Attorney -In -
Fact.
(SEAL)
Commission expires:

Notary Public in and for said State
NOTE: A copy of the Power -of -Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must be attached hereto.

BID BOND
21

Page 1598 of 1702 ends

Power of Attorney
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT:

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, an Ohio corporation hereinafter referred to severally as the "Company" and collectively as "the Companies" does hereby make, constitute and appoint:

BRITTON CHRISTIANSEN; KEVIN VEGA; PHILIP E VEGA;
each in their individual capacity, its true and lawful attorney -in -fact, with full power and authority to sign, seal, and execute on its behalf any and all bonds and undertakings, and other obligatory instruments of similar nature, in penalties not exceeding the sum of

UNLIMITED
and to bind the Company thereby. as fully and to the same extent as if such instruments were signed by the duly authorized officers of the Company; and all acts of said Attorney pursuant to the authority given are hereby ratified and confirmed.

This power of attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following resolution duly adopted by the board of directors of the Company:
"RESOLVED, that the president, or any vice president be, and each hereby is, authorized and empowered to appoint attorneys -in -fact of the Company, and to authorize them to execute and deliver on behalf of the Company any and all bonds, forms, applications, memorandums, undertakings, recognizances, transfers, contracts of indemnity, policies, contracts guaranteeing the fidelity of persons holding positions of public or private trust, and other writings obligatory in nature that the business of the Company may require; and to modify or revoke, with or without cause, any such appointment or authority; provided, however, that the authority granted hereby shall in no way limit the authority of other duly authorized agents to sign and countersign any of said documents on behalf of the Company."
"RESOLVED FURTHER, that such attomeys-in-fact shall have full power and authority to execute and deliver any and all such documents and to bind the Company subject b the terms and limitations of the power of attorney issued to them, and to affix the seal of the Company thereto; provided, however, that said seal shall not be necessary for the validity of any such documents." This power of attorney is signed and sealed under and by the following bylaws duly adopted by the board of directors of the Company.

Execution of Instruments. Any vice president, any assistant secretary or any assistant treasurer shall have the power and authority to sign or attest all approved documents, instruments, contracts, or other papers in connection with the operation of the business of the company in addition to the chairman of the board, the chief executive officer, president, treasurer or secretary; provided, however, the signature of any of them may be printed, engraved, or stamped on any approved document, contract. instrument, or other papers of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be sealed and duly attested by the signature of its officer the lst day of April, 2024.

Antonio C. Albanese, Vice President of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATEOF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS: ss
On this 1st day of April, 2024, before me carne the above -named officer for the Company aforesaid, to me personally known to be the officer described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and he acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, deposes and says, that he is the officer of the Company aforesaid, that the seal affixed hereto is the corporate seal of said Company, and the said corporate seal and his signature were duly affixed and subscribed to said instrument by the authority and direction of said Company.

Sharon Leburda
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 011A6427697
Qualified in Kings County
Commiss,an Expires January 3, 2026
Notary Public
My Commsson Expires
CERTIFICATE January 3, 2026
I, Lezlie F. Chimienti, Assistant Secretary of the Company, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full. true and correct copy of the original power of attomey issued by the Company: that the resolution included therein is a true and correct transcript from the minutes of the meetings of the boards of directors and the same has not been revoked or amended in any manner; that said Antonio C. Albanese was on the date of the execution of the foregoing power of attorney the duly elected officer of the Company, and the corporate seal and his signature as officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority of said board of directors; and the foregoing power of attorney is still in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name as Assistant Secretary, and affixed the corporate seal of said Coli,cany this' _225th day of MARCH 2025
Assistant Secretary
BDJ 1(04-24)00

Page 1599 of 1702 ends

N° 3201

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE

SAN FRANCISCO

AMENDED
Certificate of Authority
Tars Is TO CERTIFY, That, pursuant to the Insurance Code of the State of California,

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
of COLUMBUS, OHIO
laws of OHIO
, organized under the
, subject to its Articles of Incorporation or
other fundamental organizational documents, is hereby authorized to transact within this State, subject to all provisions of this Certificate, the following classes of insurance: FIRE, MARINE,

SURETY, DISABILITY, PLATE GLASS, LIABILITY, WORKMENTS COMPENSATION,

COMMON CARRIER LIABILITY, BOILER AND MACHINERY, BURGLARY, SPRINKLER, TEAM AND VEHICLE, AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT and MISCELLANEOUS insurance, as such classes are now or may hereafter be defined in the Insurance Laws of the State of California.

THIS CERTIFICATE i.s expressly conditioned upon the holder hereof now and hereafter being in full compliance with all, and not in violation of any, of the applicable laws and lawful requirements made under authority of the laws of the State of California as long as such laws or requirements are in effect and applicable, and as such laws and requirements now are, or may hereafter be changed or arncnded.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, effective as of the._ 18TH day
of APRIL
, 191?_, I have hereunto set
my hand and caused my official seal to be affixed this 18Th day of _ APRIL
By
NO I ' .

Qualification with the Secretary of State must be accomplished as required by the California Corporations Code promptly after issuance of this Certificate of Authority. Failure to do so will be a violation of Ins. Code Sec. 701 and will be grounds for revoldng this Certificate of Authority pursuant to the covenants made in the application therefor and the conditions contained herein.
, I9-72
RICHARDS D. BARGER
r\ nsura7lce C nnmissioner
JOHN ,J J. FABER
Deputy
Fo W CE.3
41011.1.0.1 ,.TO ]00 our © oer

Page 1601 of 1702 ends

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
u..1.,,t tr�xarrc �
CIVIL CODE §1189
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County of Riverside
)
)
On d71• oZ- as- before me, Yee Ping Leung, Notary Public Date
Personally appeared Elizabeth H. Mendoza
Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer
Name(s) of signer(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(4 whose names) is/ace subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that) /she/jb¢y executed the same in his/her/jh irauthorized capacity(je≤), a nd that by bit/her/t rsignature(s) on the instrumentthe person(,e), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(,5) acted, executed the instrument.

YEE PING LEUNG
COMM # 2416239
RIVERSIDE County
California Notary Publid:'
Comm Exp Sept. 16, 2026:

Place Notary Seal Above
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

OPTIONAL -
Signature of (1Jotory Public
Though this section is optional, completing this information con deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document Document Date
Number of Pages Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name
❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s)
❑ Partner ❑ Limited ❑ General
❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact
❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator
❑ Other
Signer Is Representing
Signer's Name
❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s)
❑ Partner ❑ Limited ❑General
❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact
❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator
❑ Other
Signer Is Representing
©2014 National NotaryAssociation • www.NationalNotary.org • 1 -800 -US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item#5907

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
CIVIL CODE § 1189
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
County of SAN LUIS OBISPO
On
MAR 2 5 2025 before me McKENZIE SALAZAR, NOTARY PUBLIC
,
}
Date
personally appeared BRITTON CHRISTIANSEN
Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer
Name(s) of Signer(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws
of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph — — — — is true and correct.
1,•-•• MCKENZIE SALAZAR
_ "—is Notary Public - California
e San Luis Obispo County _
j Commission # 2y':sG74
My Comm. Expires Aug 13, 21127
Place Notary Seal Above
WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature

OPTIONAL
Signature of Notary Public
Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document.

Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:

Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer's Name:
❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s):
❑ Partner — ® Limited ❑ General
O Individual D Attorney in Fact
❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator
❑ Other:

Signer Is Representing:

Document Date:

Named Above:

Signer's Name:
❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s):
❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General
❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact
❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator
Other:

Signer is Representing:
©2014 National Notary Association • www.NationalNotary.org • 1 -800 -US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907

Page 1603 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS
R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
In compliance with the Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act of the Public Contract Code of the State of California, each bidder shall set forth below: (a) the name and the location of the place of business and (b) the portion of the work which will be done by each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the Contractor in excess of one-half of 1 percent of the prime contractor's total bid or ten thousand dollars ($10,000), whichever is greater.

Portion of the Work
Subcontractor
Location of Business
% of Work

DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS
22

Page 1604 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid

BEAUMONT
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
Traffic Signal Upgrades
Portion of the Work
Subcontractor
Location of Business
% of Work
Name of Bidder PTM G neral En.ineering Services Inc.

Signature
Name and Title Elizab'E'7'!' endoza - President / CFO
Dated 4.3.25

DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS
23

Page 1605 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
�_._. R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

INFORMATION REQUIRED OF BIDDERS
R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
A. INFORMATION ABOUT BIDDER
[**Indicate not applicable ("N/A") where appropriate.**] NOTE: Where Bidder is a joint venture, pages shall be duplicated and information provided for all parties to the joint venture.

1.0 Name of Bidder: PTM General Engineering Services Inc.

2.0 Type, if Entity:

Corporation

3.0 Bidder Address: 5942 Acorn Street, Riverside, CA
92504
951.710.1006 951.710.1000
Facsimile Number Telephone Number

4.0 License Information:
891265 Class A /C10

2.28.27 License No.
1000001433
Class of License Expiration Date
DIR Registration No.

5.0 How many years has Bidder's organization been in business as a Contractor? PTM has been in operation since 2007 & Officers have
been in the industry for 30 years

5.1 How many years has Bidder's organization been in business under its present name? 18 years

6.0 Under what other or former names has Bidder's organization operated? Jade Electric CSLB 684572 -Inactive Elizabeth Mendoza Sole Owner Freeway Electric CSLB 684572 - Inactive Brian Mendoza Sole Owner Freeway Electric CSLB 947816 Cancelled and formerly Brian Mendoza President/CFO Elizabeth Mendoza VP/Secretary

INFORMATION REQUIRED OF BIDDERS
24

Page 1606 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

7.0 If Bidder's organization is a corporation, answer the following:

7.1 Date of Incorporation:

7.2 State of Incorporation:

7.3 President's Name:

10.06.2006
California
Elizabeth H. Mendoza

7.4 Vice -President's Name(s): Brian Mendoza

7.5 Secretary's Name: Brian Mendoza

7.6 Treasurer's Name: Elizabeth H. Mendoza

8.0 If an individual or a partnership, answer the following:

8.1 Date of Organization:

N/A

8.2 Name and address of all partners (state whether general or limited partnership):

N/A

9.0 If other than a corporation or partnership, describe organization and name principals: N/A

10.0 List other states in which Bidder's organization is legally qualified to do business.

California

INFORMATION REQUIRED OF BIDDERS
25

Page 1607 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

11.0 What type of work does the Bidder normally perform with its own forces? traffic signal and lighting installation / modifications, ada improvements signing installation

12.0 Has Bidder ever failed to complete any work awarded to it? If so, note when, where, and why:

13.0 Within the last five years, has any officer or partner of Bidder's organization ever been an officer or partner of another organization when it failed to complete a contract? If so, attach a separate sheet of explanation:

14.0 List Trade References:

Walters Wholesale Attn: Ryan Thibault
200 N. Berry Street, Brea, CA 92821 T: 714.784.1820
J Supp y Company AJt e or - - -
1030 N. Batavia Ste A, Orange, CA 92867 T: 714.639.9498 Robertson's Ready Mix Attn: Della Rumsey
200 N. Main St, Corona, CA 92878 T: 951.493.6525
Swarco McCain Attn: Lihn Tran
2365 Oak Ridge Way, Vista, CA 92081 T: 760.734.5009

15.0 List Bank References (Bank and Branch Address):

Commercial Bank of California Attn: Dan Murad
19752 MacArthur Blvd #100, Irvine, CA 92612 T: 909.900.8626 Email: [email protected]

INFORMATION REQUIRED OF BIDDERS
26

Page 1608 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

16.0 Name of Bonding Company and Name and Address of Agent:

Agent: C&D Bonding Attn: Mr. Phillip E. Vega
534 E. Badillo St, Covina, CA 91723 T: 626.859.1000 E: [email protected] Surety: Nationwide Mutual Insurance Attn: Michael Vanasopha 1 Park Plaza Ste 600, Irvine, CA 92614 T: 213.507.4207

INFORMATION REQUIRED OF BIDDERS
27

Page 1609 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
--� R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades
B. LIST OF CURRENT PROJECTS (Backlog)
[**Duplicate Page if needed for listing additional current projects.**] Project
Description of
Bidder's Work
Completion
Date
Cost of
Bidder's Work
Contact Name &
Phone
CT 07-352004
Modify Signal & Lighting System.
7/25
$ 2,600,233
Mr. Thong Ton
310.261.8467
Caitrans Task Orders
Repair & Replace Electrical pale
foundations 213.700.1979
6/27
$ 1,108,108.04
Mr. Kurt Newton
07 377604 $
Modify Signal & Ltg Systems in City
3/26
684,048
Mr. Frank Shin310.213.3136
City of
Temecula
TS Pedestrian Signal
Upgrade Phase 2
10/25
$ 209,009
Mr. Nick Minicilii
951,693,3917
City of Rialto
Cedar Ave & Merill Ave TS Mod
8/25
$226,026
Mr. Rodolfo Victoria
909.820.2532
City of Norwalk
Studebaker and Halcourt TS Mod
10/25
$491,091
Mr. Cad Short
840.888.7675
City of Covina
TS Installation at 4th and Badillo St
3/26
$746,046
Mr Rafael Fajardo
626.384.5490
City of Simi Valley
Install Left Turn Phasing at Three
Inteseciians
1p25
$619,Q19
Mr. Justin Link
805.583.6884

INFORMATION REQUIRED OF BIDDERS
28

Page 1610 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid

BEAUMONT
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
Traffic Signal Upgrades
C. LIST OF COMPLETED PROJECTS - LAST THREE YEARS
[**Duplicate Page if needed for listing additional completed projects.**] Please include only those projects which are similar enough to demonstrate Bidder's ability to perform the required Work.

Project Client
Description of
Bidder's Work
Period of
Performance
Cost of Bidder's
Work
Contact Name
& Phone
City of Covina
TS Imp at Covina Blvd
06/2023 - 03/2024
$541.041
Mr. Rafael Fajardo PE
& Barranca Ave
626.3845490
City of Lynwood
TS Imp at Atlantic
03/2023 - 05/2024
$474,047
Mr. Mir Fattahi PE
& Carlin
949.351.6505
City of Monterey
TS Improvements
03/2022 - 01/2024
$1,035,500
Mr. Okan Demirci
Park
714.319,6137
CT 12A2034
Mod Signal & Ltg
03/2024 - 05/2024
$259,059
Mr. Mousse Essayli PE
Signing & Striping
949.279.8816
* More references upon request

INFORMATION REQUIRED OF BIDDERS
29

Page 1611 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades
p. EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE Personnel:

The Bidder shall identify the key personnel to be assigned to this project in a management, construction supervision or engineering capacity.

1. List each person's job title, name and percent of time to be allocated to this project:

Brian Mendoza - Vice President / Secretary - Project Management

2. Summarize each person's specialized education:

Resume attached

3. List each person's years of construction experience relevant to the project:

Resume attached

4. Summarize such experience:

Resume attached
Bidder agrees that personnel named in this Bid will remain on this Project until completion of all relevant Work, unless substituted by personnel of equivalent experience and qualifications approved in advance by the City.

INFORMATION REQUIRED OF BIDDERS
30

Page 1612 of 1702 ends

Brian Mendoza
P.O.B ox 7745 Riverside CA, 92513-7745
Email:[email protected] Cell 951.722.5755
Chief Estimator and Supervisor of Outside Operations
Supervisor of Outside operations with over 18 years of experience electrician with over 20 years of experience An effective communicator and team leader, experienced in coordinating and executing large and fast paced projects.

CAREER EXPERIENCE
Freeway Electric/ PTM Engineering Services, Inc. Riverside CA 06/2006 to Date
Chief Estimator/Supervisor of Outside Operations
In charge of managing the estimating department and finalizing bid packages: coordinating the beginning phase of an awarded project between the company and agency. Project submittals, contract review Coordinated and manage crews California region: handled various sized projects ranging in size from $1,000 to $4.5 million dealing with dry utilities, wet utilities, traffic signals, and road improvements, maintained coordination Freeway Electric / PTM General Engineering and subcontractor, and project owners. In charge of handling project's administrative work: monthly gross estimates, project progress schedule, materials requisitions, contract change order negotiations and equipment purchase and rental. .4.1400
High Light Electric Inc. / Pete & Sons Construction Inc. Riverside, CA 10/1995 to 06t2006
Chief Estimator
In charge of managing the estimating departicieitt and finalizing bid packages Coordinating the beginning phase of an awarded project between the company and agency or prime contractor that include project submittals, contract review. Successfully bid on projects totaling $12 million with an average spread 6%.

Area Supervisor
Coordinated and manage 10 crews consisting of 6 members per team in the southern California region: handled various sized projects ranging in size from $1,000 to $4.5 million dealing with dry utilities, wet utilities, traffic signal, and road improvements. Maintained coordination between High Light Electric Inc. and subcontractor, general contractor and project owners In charge of handling project's administrative work; monthly gross estimates, project progress schedule, materials requisitions, contract change order negotiations and equipment purchase and rentals.

Pagelof4

Page 1613 of 1702 ends

Brian Mendoza

CAREER EXPERIENCE CONTINUED
MBE Electric, Inc. in Riverside, CA
10/1989 TO 10/1995
Vice President and Head of Outside Operations
Manage outside operations for all projects ranging in size from & 1,000 to 2.5 million. Headed an around the clock electric crew and coordinated with CC Meyers to repair the I-10 Santa Monica Freeway after it collapsed during the 1994 Northridge Earthquake to complete the fast paced project in 66 days. Maintain coordination between MBB Electric and subcontractors, general contractor and project owners: implemented and enforced safety guidelines. Handled administrative work: monthly progress estimates, material requisitions, contract change order negotiations.

Vasco Corporation in San Fernando, CA
10/1987 to 06/1989
Foreman (Part Time)
Managed day to day operations of work crews and various project ranging in size from $1,000 to $5,000 in Eastern Los Angeles County: traffic signals, street lighting, signal interconnect.

Raymore Electric in Rosemead, CA
06/1986 to 10/1987
Crew Lender (Part Time)
In charge of working crews on projects that ranging from $25,000 to 250,000 throughout Los Angeles County.

WORKING SKILLS
• Capable of operating heavy equipment such as skip loaders, cranes, and backhoes • Hands-on experience with hand tools and power tools
• Capable of overseeing fast -paced and high profile project • An effective communicator and leader

EDUCATION
• International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
• Completed training course (1988-1989) in street lighting and traffic signal installations, code enforcement and blue print reading. • South Gate High School
• Received High School Diploma in 1988

Page 2 of 4 ends

Page 1614 of 1702 ends

BRIAN MENDOZA

CONTINUED

LANGUAGES
• English (Native)
• Spanish (Fluent)

AWARD RECEIVED
• Recipient of the U.S. Small Business "Young Entrepreneur of the year" Award in 1996, nationally.
• Recipient of the Certificate of Recognition by the City lo Los Angeles for "Small Business" in 1997.
• Recipient of the Certificate of Recognition by the State Assembly, Assemblyman Mr. Rod Pacheco, for the "Top 500 Inland Empire Small Business" in 1997.
• Ranked among the "Top 500 Inland Empire Hispanic Owned Companies" Since 1997.
• Certification of Appreciation for our participation and maximization in the " Century Freeway Affirmative Action" by CFAAC

PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL REFERNCES
Caltrans project#071224U4 (Electrical contract amount $4.5 million) Description of project: Installation of traffic signals, ramp metering, sing illumination, Highway Lighting, Fiber option communication and electrical irrigation along the I-10 Freeway in LOS Angeles County.
• Doug Dawson — Project Manager for prime contractor, Balfour Beatty Cell (949) 232-3276 and Office (909) 397-8040.
• Patty Galvan — Resident Engineer, Office (909) 594-4270 • Veronica Ross — Electrical Inspector, Cell (714) 606-6311

Page 3 of 4 ends

Page 1615 of 1702 ends

BRIAN MENDOZA

REFERNCES CONTINUED
City of Redlands Contract #208300-72304/41008 (Electrical contract amount is $218,800) project Completed in 2003
Description of project: Installation of traffic signals, modification of ramp metering, lighting and sign illumination.
• Bi11 Hensley — Senior Civil Engineer — Office (909) 798-7586 ext.2 • Juan Olvera — Project Manager for general contractor, H&H Construction — Cell (951) 453-7712 and Office (909) 473-7331.

Caltrans project #08-4567V4) Electrical contract amount is $ 938,238) project completed in 2005 Description of project: Installation of lighting system along the I-15 Freeway in San Bernardino County.
• Gary Vogel -- Project Manager for prime contractor, Granite Construction Cell:
(661) 549-3953 and Office (661) 726-4447.

Sandbag Projects, Segment 1, 2, 3 early segment 9, and alder Ave. (Total electrical contract amount was $3.2 million) Project completed in 2004.

Description of Projects: Installation of traffic signals, ramp metering, sign illumination, highway lighting, fiber optic communication, and electrical irrigation along the 1-10 Freeway in San Bernardino County.
• Harold Lantis -- Sandbag Contract Manager — Ce11: (760) 802-7730 and Office (909) 875-8029 ext.213.
• Tim Hanable — Caltrans Inspector — Cell: (951) 712-0021 • Al Ortega — Project Manager for prime contractor, Yeager Skanska — Cell: (714) 240-5333.

City of Indio Project#ST0137 (Electrical contract amount was $1.4 million) project completed in 2005.

Description of project: Installation of street lighting system, traffic signals, electrical irrigation, and dry Utilities.
• Gary Bexter -- Area Manager for prime contractor, Yeager Skanska Construction Cell: (909) 721-9749 and Office (760) 343-5472.
• Tommy Young — Project Manager for prime contractor — Cell: (951) 232-6618 and Office (760) 343-5472.
• Mehran Sepehri — City Engineer — Cell: (760) 250-2201 Additional Professional References:
• Zale Harris — Caltrans Inspector — Ce11: (951) 289-0047 • Ray Robles — Caltrans area supervisor — Cell: (909) 799-0646

Page 4 of 4 ends

Page 1616 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
Additional Bidder's Statements:

BEAUMONT
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
Traffic Signal Upgrades
If the Bidder feels that there is additional information which has not been included in the questionnaire above, and which would contribute to the qualification review, it may add that information in a statement here or on an attached sheet, appropriately marked:

E. VERIFICATION AND EXECUTION
These Bid Forms shall be executed only by a duly authorized official of the Bidder:

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing information is true and correct:

Name of Bidder
Signature
Name and Title
Dated
PTM Ger ral Engineering Services Inc.

Elizabeth H. Mendoza - President / CFO

4.3.25 INFORMATION REQUIRED OF BIDDERS
31

Page 1617 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont
Request for bid
R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont
BEAUMONT Traffic Signal Upgrades

NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
R-25-06 COUGAR AND BEAUMONT TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES
Elizabeth H. Mendoza , being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he is of President / CFO the party making the attached bid; that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid.

I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Name of Bidder _ PTM Genet'( I Engineering Services Inc.

Signature
Name and Title Elizabeth H. Mendoza - President / CFO
Dated 4.3.25

NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
32

Page 1618 of 1702 ends

C25-46

CITY OF BEAUMONT

PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT "C"

INSURANCE CERTIFICATES AND ENDORSEMENTS
(Insert behind this page.)
16

Page 1619 of 1702 ends

ACORO° CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
�..----

DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
05/13/2025
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

PRODUCER
McRae Associates Insurance Services
1265 N. Manassero St Suite 303
Anaheim, CA 92807
NAMEACT Maricela Aguirre
PHO(A/C, No. EXt): (714)779-6999 (A/C, ' No): (714)779-6903 E-MAIL
ADDRESS: [email protected]

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
NAIC #
INSURERA: ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY
24856

INSURED
PTM GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.

PO BOX 7745
RIVERSIDE, CA 92503
INSURER e : EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
10120
INSURERC: Admiral Insurance Company
24856
INSURERD: Ace American Insurance Co
22667
INSURER E: ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
27154
INSURER F: GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE CO
16691

COVERAGES
CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 00000180-0
REVISION NUMBER: 81

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

INSR
LTR

TYPE OF INSURANCE
ADDL
NSD
S
W VD

POLICY NUMBER

POLICY EFF
(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EXP
(MM/DD/YYYY)
LIMITS
A
X

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Y
Y
CA000033335-07
01/29/2025
01/29/2026

EACH OCCURRENCE
$ 1,000,000
$ 300,000

CLAIMS -MADE
X
OCCUR

DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence)
X
Deductible $5,000
MED EXP (Any one person)
$ 5,000

PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$ 1,000,000
GEN'L

AGGREGATE
X

LIMIT APPLIES
JECT
PER:

LOC

GENERAL AGGREGATE
$ 2,000,000
$ 2,000,000

PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$
B

AUTOMOBILE
X
X
X

LIABILITY

ANY AUTO
OWNED

AUTOS ONLY
HIRED

AUTOS ONLY
Deduc. Comp/Colt
A
X

SCHEDULED
AUTOS

NON -OWNED

AUTOS ONLY
$2,000
Y
Y
CF1 CA00225-221
02/09/2025
02/09/2026

MBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(CO.E accident)
$ 1,000,000
$
BODILY INJURY (Per person)
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
$

PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Per accident)
$
$
C
X

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB
X
OCCUR

CLAIMS -MADE
Y
Y
GX000005151-04
01/29/2025
01/29/2026

EACH OCCURRENCE
$ 5,000,000

AGGREGATE
$ 5,000,000
DED RETENT ON $ 0
In Excess of
$ GL & Aut
D

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
Y / N
N / A
Y
C58817569
08/01/2024
08/01/2025
X
PER

STATUTE
OTH-
ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
$ 2,000,000
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
$ 2,000,000
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
$ 2,000,000
E
F
IM I LEASED & RENT.

BUILDERS RISK POLICY
710-03-95-03-00
IMP25710650200
07/10/2024
05/23/2024
07/10/2025
05/23/2025
LIMITS
LIMIT
300,000
$500,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) Project Desc: R-25-06 Cougar and Beaumont Traffic Signal Upgrades project; (PTM Job P25-09) The City of Beaumont, its elected and appointed officers, employees, agents and volunteers are named as additional insured as required by written contract with respect to General Liability and Auto Liability. 30 Days' Notice of Cancellation to certificate holder, 10 days for non-payment of premium applies.

CERTIFICATE HOLDER

CANCELLATION
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th St.

Beaumont, CA 92223

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(MAG)

Page 620 ends

ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Printed by MAG on 05/13/2025 at 08:42PM

A�� [JIB CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

DATE(MM/DDNYYY)
01/28/2025
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

PRODUCER

PATRICK MCRAE INSURANCE SERVICES
1265 N. MANASSERO SUITE 303
ANAHEIM HILLS CA 92807
CONTNAME: Maricela Aguirre
(A/CNN . Eat): (714) 779-6999
(p' No): (714) 779-6903
E-MAIL
ADDRESS: [email protected]

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
NAIC #
INSURERA: CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
44520

INSURED
PTM GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.

PO BOX 7745
RIVERSIDE CA 92503
INSURER B : UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON
AA1122000
INSURERC:

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURERF:

COVERAGES
CERTIFICATE NUMBER:

REVISION NUMBER:

INSR LTR

TYPE OF INSURANCE

INSD DDL

SUBR WVD

POLICY NUMBER

POLICY EFF
(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EXP
(MM/DD/YYYY)
LIMITS

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

EACH OCCURRENCE
$

CLAIMS -MADE
OCCUR

DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence)
$
MED EXP (Any one person)
$

PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$
GEN'L

AGGREGATE
POLICY
OTHER:

LIMIT APPLIES
PRO-
JECT
PER:

LOC

GENERAL AGGREGATE
$

PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$
$

AUTOMOBILE

LIABILITY

ANY AUTO
OWNED

AUTOS ONLY
HIRED

AUTOS ONLY

SCHEDULED
AUTOS

NON -OWNED

AUTOS ONLY

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident)
$
BODILY INJURY (Per person)
$
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
$

PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Per accident)
$
$
A
X

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB
X
OCCUR

CLAIMS -MADE
Y
Y
SEO-130598
2ND TIER -GOING OVER

PRIMARY EXCESS
01/29/2025
01/29/2026

EACH OCCURRENCE
$ 5,000,000

AGGREGATE
$ 5,000,000
DED
RETENTION $
$

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY

ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
Y / N
N / A
PER

STATUTE
OTH-
ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
$
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
$
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
$
B

CONTRACTORS POLLUTION LIABILITY
ENP0011784-01
08/24/2024
08/24/2025
LIMIT OF INS.
$1,000,000 EACH INCIDENT
$2,000,000 POL. AGG.

DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS /VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) **Certificate holder and Description is the same as listed on the first certificate**.

CERTIFICATE HOLDER

CANCELLATION

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

The ACORD nam fbd l redisjt Mmarks of ACORD

Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability Policy
Named Insured
P.T.M. GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
5942 ACORN STREET,
RIVERSIDE, CA 92504
Endorsement Number
Policy Number
Symbol: WLR Number: C58817569
Policy Period
8/1/2024 TO 8/1/2025
Effective Date of Endorsement
8/1/2024
Issued By (Name of the Insurance Company)
Ace American Insurance Company
Insert the policy number. The remainder of the information is to be completed only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to the preparation of the policy.

This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated.

CALIFORNIA WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT This endorsement applies only to the insurance provided by the policy because California is shown in Item

3.A. of the Information Page.

We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule, but this waiver applies only with respect to bodily injury arising out of the operations described in the Schedule, where you are required by a written contract to obtain this waiver from us.

You must maintain payroll records accurately segregating the remuneration of your employees while engaged in the work described in the Schedule.

Schedule

1. ( ) Specific Waiver
Name of person or organization:
(x) Blanket Waiver
Any person or organization for whom the Named Insured has agreed by written contract to furnish this waiver.

2. Operations:

ALL CALIFORNIA OPERATIONS

3. Premium:

The premium charge for this endorsement shall be 1.0 percent of the California premium developed on payroll in connection with work performed for the above person(s) or organization(s) arising out of the operations described.

4. Minimum Premium: $0
Authorized Agent
WC 90 03 75 (05/18)

Page 1622 of 1702 ends

Policy Number: CA000033335-07
CG 20 10 04 13
Effective Date: 01/29/2025
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR

CONTRACTORS - SCHEDULED PERSON

OR ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

SCHEDULE
Name Of Additional Insured Person(s)
Or Organization(s)
Location(s) Of Covered Operations
Any person or organization that is an owner or manager of real property or personal property on which you are per- forming ongoing operations, or a contractor on whose be- half you are performing ongoing operations, but only if cov- erage as an additional insured is required by a written contract or written agreement that is an "insured contract", and provided the "bodily injury" or "property damage" first occurs, or the "personal and advertising injury" offense is first committed, subsequent to the execution of the contract or agreement.

All locations at which the Named Insured is performing
ongoing operations.

Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.

1. Your acts or omissions; or

2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf; in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s) designated above.

However:

1. The insurance afforded to such additional insured only applies to the extent permitted by law; and

2. If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the insurance afforded to such additional insured will not be broader than that which you are required by the contract or agreement to provide for such additional insured.

B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following additional exclusions apply:

This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurring after:

1. All work, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed; or
CG 20 10 04 13 © InsuRfifitSet623 Offi'WW,Q2c., 2012

Page 1 of 2 ends

2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project.

C. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following is added to Section III — Limits Of Insurance:

If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the most we will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance:

1. Required by the contract or agreement; or

2. Available under the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations; whichever is less.

This endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations.

CG 20 10 04 13 © insuBagegli6241s affic702c., 2012

Page 2 of 2 ends

Policy Number: CA000033335-07
CG 20 37 04 13
Effective Date: 01/29/2025
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR

CONTRACTORS - COMPLETED OPERATIONS
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART

SCHEDULE
Name Of Additional Insured Person(s)
Or Organization(s)
Location And Description Of
Completed Operations
Any person or organization that is an owner or manager of real property or personal property for whom you work or have worked, or a contractor on whose behalf you work or have worked, but only if coverage as an additional insured extending to "bodily injury" or "property damage" included in the "products -completed operations hazard" is required by a written contract or written agreement that is an "insured contract" and provided that the "bodily injury" or "property damage" first occurs subsequent to the execution of the contract or agreement.

All locations except locations where "your work" is or was related to a job or project involving single-family dwellings, multi -family dwellings (other than rental apartments in an apartment building: (a) originally constructed and at all times used for such purpose, or (b) converted from a commercial building), condominiums, townhomes, townhouses, time -
share units, fractional -ownership units, cooperatives and/or any other structure or space used or intended to be used as a residence.

Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.

A. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury" or "property damage" caused, in whole or in part, by "your work" at the location designated and described in the Schedule of this endorsement performed for that additional insured and included in the "products -completed operations hazard".

However:

1. The insurance afforded to such additional insured only applies to the extent permitted by law; and

B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following is added to Section III — Limits Of Insurance:

If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the most we will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance:

1. Required by the contract or agreement; or

2. Available under the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations; whichever is less.

This endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations.

CC 20 37 04 13
© Ins LP Q i1625 affi1ccO2c., 2011 Page 1 of 1 D

Policy Number: CA000033335-07

3. Limits of Insurance
a. The amount we will pay for damages is limited as described below with respect to damages covered under this en- dorsement:
(1) The Aggregate Limit shown in the Schedule is the most we will pay for the sum of all damages because of "property damage";
(2) The Each Occurrence Limit shown above is the most we will pay for the sum of all damages because of "prop- erty damage" arising out of any one "occurrence";
Supplementary Payments will reduce the Each Occurrence and Aggregate Limits of Insurance shown in the Schedule; and
(4) All sums we pay for damages or Supplementary Payments under this endorsement will reduce the Each Occur- rence Limit and the General Aggregate Limit shown in the Declarations.

4. Other Insurance
(3)
This insurance is excess over any other valid and collectible Property or Inland Marine insurance available to you, either as a Named Insured or an Additional Insured, whether primary, excess, contingent or any other basis.

PRIMARY AND NONCONTRIBUTORY —

OTHER INSURANCE CONDITION
(Insurance Services Office Endorsement CG 20 01 04 13)
The following is added to the Other Insurance Condition and supersedes any provision to the contrary:

Primary And Noncontributory Insurance
This insurance is primary to and will not seek contribution from any other insurance available to an additional insured under your policy provided that:
(1) The additional insured is a Named Insured under such other insurance; and (2) You have agreed in writing in a contract or agreement that this insurance would be primary and would not seek con- tribution from any other insurance available to the additional insured.

WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US (Insurance Services Office Endorsement CG 24 04 05 09)

SCHEDULE
Name Of Person Or Organization:

Any person or organization, but only if the following conditions are met:
(1) You have expressly agreed to the waiver in a written contract; and (2) The injury or damage first occurs subsequent to the execution of the written contract.

Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.

The following is added to Paragraph 8. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us of Section IV — Condi- tions:

We waive any right of recovery we may have against the person or organization shown in the Schedule above because of payments we make for injury or damage arising out of your ongoing operations or "your work" done under a contract with that person or organization and included in the "products -completed operations hazard". This waiver applies only to the per- son or organization shown in the Schedule above.

AD 68 93 01 17
Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., Page 3 of 8 D with itaags1i6,2€ if ,12ii02& 2013.

POLICY NO.: CF1CA00225-221

COMMERCIAL AUTO
ECA 04 521 04 14
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

ADDITIONAL INSURED - DESIGNATED ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE PART

SCHEDULE
Name Of Additional Insured Organization

ALL ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT WITH THE NAMED INSURED TO

BE NAMED AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED ON THIS POLICY WITH REGARD TO THEIR OPERATION, MAINTENANCE OR USE OF A COVERED "AUTO".

Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations.

The following is added to the Who Is An Insured
paragraph under Section II — Liability Coverage:

The organization shown in the Schedule with respect
to the operation, maintenance, or use of a covered
"auto" if you are required to add such organization to
this policy as an additional insured in order to comply with the terms of a written "insured contract" or written agreement. This does not apply when such contract
or agreement:

A. Involves the owner or anyone else from whom you
hire or borrow a covered "auto" unless it is a
"trailer" connected to a covered "auto" you own; or
B. Is executed after the date of "loss".

This paragraph does not apply if:

1. The terms and conditions of the written
"insured contract" had been agreed upon prior
to the "accident" or "loss"; and

2. You can definitively establish that the terms
and conditions of the written "insured contract"
ultimately executed are the same as those
which had been agreed upon prior to the
"accident" or "loss".

ECA 04 521 04 14
Copyright, Everest Reinsurance Company, 2014
Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., evill6Npefrtli792.n

Page 1 of 1 ends

POLICY NO.: CF1 CA00225-221

COMMERCIAL AUTO
ECA 24 503 02 14
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY

AGAINST OTHERS TO US
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

AUTO DEALERS COVERAGE FORM

BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM

MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM

SCHEDULE
Name of Person or Organization:

ALL PERSONS OR ORGANIZATIONS AS REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT WITH THE NAMED INSURED. THE WRITTEN CONTRACT MUST BE SIGNED PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE "ACCIDENT".
(If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.)
The TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US Condition is amended by the addition of the following:

We waive any right of recovery we may have against the person or organization shown in the Schedule above because of payments we make for an "accident" or "loss", provided that you are required under a written agree- ment to waive your rights of recovery. The written agreement must be made prior to the date of the "accident" or "loss". This waiver applies only to the person or organization shown in the Schedule above.

ECA 24 503 02 14
Copyright, Everest Reinsurance Company, 2014 Page 1 of 1 O Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc.Inc.Bage vti62Esgofer i0Eon.

POLICY NO.: CF1 CA00225-221

COMMERCIAL AUTO
ECA 24 509 04 14
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

PRIMARY AND NONCONTRIBUTORY -

OTHER INSURANCE CONDITION - BLANKET
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE PART
Paragraph c. of the Other Insurance General
Condition is replaced by the following:
c. Regardless of the provisions of Paragraph a.
above, this Coverage Form's Liability Coverage is
primary and we will not seek contribution from any
other insurance for any liability assumed under an
"insured contract" that requires liability to be
assumed on a primary noncontributory basis.

Additionally, only the coverage and limit of
insurance requirements of the "insured contract"
shall apply, and in no event shall those
requirements exceed the coverage and limits of
insurance provided under this policy.

ECA 24 509 04 14
Copyright, Everest Reinsurance Company, 2014
Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., Pagewil6Npefn11702n

Page 1 of 1 ends

California Levine Act Statement
California Government Code Section 84308, commonly referred to as the "Levine Act," prohibits any Beaumont City Council Member from participating in any action related to a contract or application if he or she receives any political contributions totaling more than $500 within the previous twelve months, and for twelve months following the date a final decision from the business/board or applicant.

The Levine Act also requires a member of the Beaumont City Council who has received such a contribution to disclose the contribution on the record of the proceeding.

Current Beaumont City Council Members are listed at:
https://www.beaumontca.gov/29/City-Council
Proposers are responsible for accessing this link to review the names prior to answering the following questions.

1. Have you or your company, or any agent/board member on behalf of you or your company/entity, made any political contributions of more than $500 to any Beaumont City Council Member in the 12 months preceding the date of the submission of your proposal or application, or the anticipated date of any Council action? YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):

2. Do you or your company/entity, or any agency on behalf of you or your company/entity, anticipate or plan to make any political contribution of more than $500 to any Beaumont City Council Member in the 12 months following any Council action related to your proposal or application?
YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):

NO
Answering yes to either of the two questions above does not preclude the Beaumont City Council from awarding a contract or approving an application or any subsequent action. It does however, preclude the identified Council Member(s) from participating in any actions related to your proposal or application.
o
Date
S
I,lizahu11t H _ N'16)))))07))
horized individual
Company/Applicant Name
6) v 5 (9"). 769-852C)
�t„ c� 1�rau,r:ont 1 ��0 E. 6th street, Eie��!,amont, CA 9.-.7?3 j � ,_�J.) tSc_.aurnc;n1:GA.gov

Page 1630 of 1702 ends

BEAUMONT
-C A L I F O R N I A
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Robert Vestal, Director of Public Works
DATE: June 3, 2025
SUBJECT: Highland Springs Avenue Painted Median Adjustment Description Adjust the painted median along Highland Springs Avenue, south of Sixth Street, to eliminate left turn ingress and egress from commercial center.

Background and Analysis:

Highland Springs Avenue is a key corridor that experiences significant traffic volumes.

The commercial center's current left -turn access contributes to congestion and safety concerns, leading to delays, near -misses, and potential collisions. City staff has reviewed traffic patterns and accident reports, and findings suggest that restricting left turns will streamline movement and mitigate risks.

Eliminating the left turn ingress and egress will improve safety, enhance traffic flow, and provide some economic benefits.

Improved Safety
• Reducing left -turn movements minimizes conflict points, lowering the likelihood of collisions.
• Preventing abrupt stops from vehicles attempting to turn left reduces rear -end crashes.
• Enhancing visibility and predictability for drivers leads to smoother traffic operations.

Enhanced Traffic Flow
• Eliminating left turns will optimize adjacent signal timing and alleviate bottlenecks.
• Increase left turn pocket length on the northbound Highland Springs Ave and Sixth Street Intersection.
• Increase left turn pocket length on the southbound Highland Springs Ave and Joshua Palmer Way Intersection.

Page 1631 of 1702 ends

• Drivers will utilize existing signalized intersections or alternate routes, distributing traffic more efficiently.
• Continuous movement along Highland Springs Avenue will reduce congestion during peak hours.

Economic Benefits
• Smoother traffic flow encourages more customers to access the commercial center via safer, alternative entry points.
• A reduction in accident -related delays improves accessibility, benefiting local businesses.
• Streamlined routes can enhance the area's overall appeal, supporting economic growth.

On May 6, 2025, Beaumont City staff engaged in discussions with the City of Banning's Public Works Director and City Engineer regarding the proposed median adjustment.

The City of Banning's Public Works Director and City Engineer expressed their agreement and support for the plan, recognizing its potential to improve regional traffic flow and minimize congestion -related risks.

City staff recommends authorizing the adjustment of the painted median along Highland Springs Avenue to eliminate left -turn ingress and egress at the commercial center intersection. Proper signage and public outreach should accompany implementation to ensure a smooth transition for motorists.

Page 1632 of 1702 ends

Figure 1 - Existing Highland Springs Avenue Median

Page 1633 of 1702 ends

ZOL I. 40 17E9I, abed
Figure 2- Proposed Highland Springs Avenue Median Adjustmen ts of
-n
z
D
m
77 rREVERSE CURV
N HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE.

X38, 70

REVERSE CURVE
50' 50'

EXISTING EXTEND
LEFT TURN -•• •••-LEFT TURN

POCKET TO POCKET
REMIAN
117'

REMOVE AND REPLACE

LEFT TURN POCKET AND

INSTALL PAINTED MEDIAN

W ITH CHEVRON STRIPING
20W

EXTEND LEFT

TURN POCKET
100'

EXISTING LEFT TURN-'

STRIPING TO REMAIN
'IS ) 3SI,W M

Fiscal Impact:

The estimated cost to prepare this staff report is $700.

All cost associated with revising the painted median is estimated to be $5,000 and will be paid from the Public Works operations budget.

Recommended Action:

Authorize City staff to adjust the painted median along Highland Springs Avenue, south of Sixth Street, to eliminate left turn ingress and egress from the commercial center intersection.

Attachments:

A. Improvement Plan

Page 1635 of 1702 ends

GENERAL SIGNAGE/STRIPING NOTES
(17)BOLT DOWN CHANNELIZERS
INSTALLED AT 6 FT. SPACING

AND CENTERED ABOUT ENTRANCE

ENLARGED PLAN
J
U
Q 0
W W
2 Z
O
U U
O0
F- Z
W
U
Z O
Q I
F-
Z
W
E 6TH ST.

LEFT TURN LANE TO BE REMOVED

AND REPLACED WITH RIGHT TURN

ONLY, PENDING APPROVAL FROM

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
96' APPROX
O
A

FIELD VERIFY
SCALE: 1" = 20'
I
N HIGHLAND SPRINGS AVE.
10FWYONRAMP
01 ti
Co
M

REVERSE CURVE
I
i_F-
LU
w
0 NM w
tt
W I -
a)
ti

REVERSE CURVE
Co
M
1 ti
w
U
Q
-J
U.1
0 w
0 5
w
0 Q
H
w
NG
0 O
a
z
ce
H
I-
w
w
J
Z
ci
w
S
0 w
I-
cc
a
J
-J
a
F-
N
Z
0QF-
w
X 0
w w a
J
U,
o z
z g
X u-
w w
-J
W RAMSEY ST.
0 � z
w
Y �
O w
O ce
a

JOSHUA PALMER WY
10 FWY OFF
RAMP
1 ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2010 CALTRANS DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD

PLANS, LATEST EDITION HEREAFTER REFEREED TO AS THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD PLANS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

2. TRAFFIC STRIPES, RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS AND SIGNS, (EXCEPT PAVEMENT LEGENDS), SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2010 MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD).

3. PAVEMENT LEGENDS SHALL EXACTLY MATCH THE CITY OF BEAUMONT STANDARD STENCILS.

4. RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS IN SECTION 85 OF

THE CALTRANS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, ENTITLED "PAVEMENT MARKERS". ADHESIVE FOR PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS IN SECTION 95-2.04 OF CALTRANS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (2010 EDITION) ENTITLED "RAPID SET EPDXY ADHESIVE FOR PAVEMENT MARKERS".

5. THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPES AND MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO THE SECTION 84-2, ENTITLED "THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS", AS

SPECIFIED IN THE CALTRANS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (2010 EDITION).

6. ALL TRAFFIC STRIPING, PAVEMENT LEGENDS AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS THAT

CONFLICT OR CONFUSE TRAFFIC AS A RESULT OF THE NEWLY INSTALLED WORK SHOWN

ON THIS PLAN SHALL REMOVED BY WET SANDBLASTING OR GRINDING AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
7 DEBRIS FROM REMOVAL OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE WORK AREA AND

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO PROTECT PERSONS AND PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE SANDBLASTING OPERATIONS. THE DEBRIS RESULTING

FROM THE SANDBLASTING SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR. DEBRIS WITHIN THE ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED BY MECHANICAL SWEEPING OR HIGH -POWER VACUUM.

8. ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 56, ENTITLED "SIGNS', AS SPECIFIED IN THE CALTRANS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (2010 EDITION).

SIGNS SHALL BE REFLECTORIZED SHEET ALUMINUM USING HIGH INTENSITY GRADE SHEETING WITH 3M #1150 PROTECTIVE OVERLAY FILM OR APPROVED EQUAL. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE MOUNTED WITH THEFT/VANDA-PROOF FASTENERS.

9. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE STANDARD SIZE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2010 MUTCD, EXCEPT PARKING RELATED SIGNS SHALL BE 12' x 18".

10. PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 4216, IF THE WORK IN AN AREA WHICH IS KNOWN, OR

REASONABLY SHOULD KNOW, TO CONTAIN SUBSURFACE INSTALLATIONS, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S.A.) AT 1-800-227-2600 AND OBTAIN AN INQUIRY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS (48 HOURS) PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK THAT PENETRATES THE EXISTING SURFACE.

11. STRIPING LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO APPLICATION OF THE THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL. CONTACT THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY INSPECTOR AT (951) 769-8520 EXT. 250 (BEAUMONT) 2 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO LAYOUT.

12. STEEL SIGN POSTS INSTALLED IN CONCRETE AREAS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN METAL SLEEVES TO FACILITATE REPLACEMENT. ALL POSTS SHALL BE 2" TELSPAR POSTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.

SCALE: 1"=40'
0 40'
80'
DIGAL1RT
Call 2 Working Days
Before You Dig!
811
BENCHMARK:

THE TOP OF CURB AT THE POINT OF

CURVATURE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF

THE NORTHWEST CURB RETURN AT THE

INTERSECTION OF HIGHLAND SPRINGS
AVENUE AND 2ND STREET.

ELEV. 2559.03, TBM
BY
MARK

DESCRIPTION
APPR.

DATE

PUBLIC WOR
<S DEPARTMENT
DESIGN BY:

RLV
DRAWN BY:

E.D.

CHECKED BY:

H.E.

SCALE:
1"=40'
DATE:
4/25/2025
JOB NUMBER:

BEAUMONT
-CAL_ I F-OFN I A -

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
REVIEWED BY:

RECOMMENDED BY:

APPROVED BY:

STAFF ENGINEER

PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
DATE:

DATE:

CITY OF BEAUMONT, CALIFORNIA
IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:

STRIPING PLANS
1691 E 6th St, Beaumont, CA 92223
SHEET
1 OF 1 SHEETS
FILE Na

ENGINEER

REVISIONS
CITY

CITY ENGINEER

Page 1636 of 1702 ends

BEAUMONT
-C A L I F O R N I A
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Robert Vestal, Director of Public Works
DATE: June 3, 2025
SUBJECT: Adopt a List of Projects Funded by SB 1 - The Road Repair and Accountability Act for FY25/26 (CIP R26-01)
Description Identify the projects and streets that will be funded by SB1 during the 25/26 FY.

Background and Analysis:

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, passed by the State of California, provides the City with a funding source through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). The funds available through the RMRA fund street, road and highway -related projects. The City is projected to receive $1,506,411 during FY 2025/26.

In order to obtain RMRA funds through the California Department of Transportation (DOT), the City is required to identify the projects that will be receiving RMRA funds on the capital improvement project (CIP) list. The following project was selected for FY 2025/26 RMRA funds:
• CIP R26-01 Citywide Street Rehabilitation and Maintenance 25/26 (Project) The project limits are as follows:
• A portion of the Fairway Canyon neighborhood, general boundaries are San Timoteo Canyon Rd, Stockton St., Cherry Valley Blvd., and the northern City boundary, and
• A portion of the Tournament Hills community between Cherry Valley Blvd. and Desert Lawn Dr.
• A portion of Union St. and Hannon Rd. bounded by the northern City boundary.

Page 1637 of 1702 ends

• A portion of the Town Center neighborhood, general boundaries are Olive Ave., Sixth St., Vallecito Ave., and Twelfth St.
• A portion of the Sundance neighborhood, with the general boundaries being Cherry Ave., Eighth St., Xenia Ave., and Oak Valley Parkway. • A portion of Highland Springs Avenue between Eighth Street and the UPRR Right -of -Way.

Figure 1 — Fairway Canyon & Tournament Hills Neighborhood

Page 1638 of 1702 ends

Figure 2 — Union St. and Hannon Rd.

O
4a,
is it a 3,c
• I ...z D e r ter..

II.; i. 1 5� dR'J 3� .414.„., "
N e. ! i i ,k4 4 . SI i - ID,
•
VW
Figure 3 — Town Center Neighborhood
i e �
st : ,
tai
u, Iryi�F
!t. l a :- C W +. .., '"' �+'_ •WO _ 6� •. �I �AI:27...:11:
y i..
!-"w il•- ,

7. 414
(r V R: ,y� I,Pca z�sls, • -.9 �/ *if,: , � � -.:il - , rSi aAr �� Y-4- tea . " a •c i rcv�! tom = < a Pr I • a_ ,fit y,#.

I s ,iLy r _r8ny _...J -t. cal '..44-r.'aa a. c IIir�_ _� Lnir11i7''r 1 '-',-11---=?',-,-: as c F-
%•• f 71".11r2.. P e ;l i ! 0 ` VII -05V , •. J vet L iY. ■Y' i cr
9TH
Figure 4— Sundance Neighborhood

Page 1639 of 1702 ends

C / .,..�Wrde. U 's s• a a
l�f QU .
fOiti,f .1t' 1�q .,...7,1-v.•
ae s�-- �..� .. :ate ?,
.

A
1 r. t • _ • lam'' i�
� ..

I ...!s r a
Jw
er a !k -
lL' - ��_.. i{• Jt -.,41,'y T-
r i - --fi
nN '
Iy •a y.
•
!• d
'"'� - �M .�1•,-ail
Figure 5- Highland Springs Avenue
As part of the ongoing maintenance on city streets, the Project will extend the life of existing streets based on the treatment method.
• Slurry Seal 5 to 7 years
• Mill and overlay 10 to 15 years
A majority of the streets in the Project will receive a slurry seal treatment, with select areas receiving mill and overlay. Minor cracks in the roadway will be sealed prior to all treatments. Refer to Attachment B for an exhibit of the streets and treatment methods.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost of preparing the staff report is estimated to be $400.

Page 1640 of 1702 ends

The current item has no fiscal impact. A future item will be brought to the City Council to award the construction of the project. The construction will be funded from the CIP26- 01 Citywide Street Rehabilitation and Maintenance FY25/26 project, as shown below.

CIP R26-01 Citywide Street Rehabilitation and Maintenance FY26 Project Funding Summary
Estimated Total Project Budget = $4,384,761
Current Project Budget = $4,384,761
CIP R26-01 Citywide Street Rehabilitation and Maintenance FY26 Project Budget Summary
Project
Component
Est. Total
Budget
Current
Budget
Paid to
Date
Remaining
Budget
Project Management
Preliminary Services
Environmental
WP -
Design
Permits
Right -of -Way
Construction $4,384,761
$4,384,761
Construction Management
I
$4,384,761 $4,384,761 $-

Page 1641 of 1702 ends

Recommended Action:

Waive the full reading and adopt by title only, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Beaumont to Adopt a List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2025/26 Funded by SB-1:

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017".

Attachments:

A. Resolution to Adopt a List of Projects Funded by SB 1 for FY 25/26: The Road Repair and Accountability Act.

B. Project Street List and Exhibit

Page 1642 of 1702 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT TO ADOPT A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi -modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project's completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and WHEREAS, the City, will receive an estimated $ 1,506,411 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2025-26 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the ninth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and WHEREAS, the City has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community's transportation priorities and the project list; and WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high -priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the communities priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the 2020 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City streets and roads are in an "good" condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a "Excellent" condition; and
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets

Page 1643 of 1702 ends

infrastructure, and using cutting -edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co -benefits statewide.

NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND by the City Council of the City Beaumont, State of California, as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The following list of newly proposed projects will be funded in -part or solely with Fiscal Year 2025/26 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:
a. Annual Citywide Street Rehabilitation and Maintenance 25/26:

1. Description: the project will consist of applying slurry seal treatment, and mill and overlay of existing streets within the City of Beaumont, consisting of local, collector, and secondary streets that are identified in the City's Pavement Management Report.

2. Schedule: Construction is anticipated to begin in May of fiscal year 25/26 and completion is anticipated in August 2026.

3. Useful Life: Slurry seal treatment is projected to increase the minimum useful life of streets by 5 years to a maximum useful life of 7 years. New asphalt surface is projected to increase the minimum useful life of streets by 15 years to a maximum useful life of 30 years.

4. Location: The streets that are applicable to receive slurry seal are as follows:
i. A portion of the Fairway Canyon neighborhood, general boundaries are San Timoteo Canyon Rd., Stockton St., Cherry Valley Blvd. and the northern City boundary.
ii. A portion of the Tournament Hills community between Cherry Valley Blvd. and Desert Lawn Dr.
iii. A portion of Union St. and Hannon Rd. bounded by the northern City boundary.
iv. A portion of the Town Center neighborhood, general boundaries are Olive Ave., Sixth St., Vallecito Ave., and Twelfth St.

Page 1644 of 1702 ends

v. A portion of the Sundance neighborhood, general boundaries are Cherry Ave., Eighth St., Xenia Ave., and Oak Valley Parkway.
vi. A portion of Highland Springs Avenue between Eighth St. and the UPRR Right -of -Way.

MOVED, PASSED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

By:

Mike Lara, Mayor

Page 1645 of 1702 ends

Street_Nam From_ To Treatment_ Location
Champions Desert Lawn Ryders Cup Mill Tournament Hills
Champions Ryders Cup Tukwet Canyon Mill Tournament Hills Tukwet Canyon Stockton City Bndry Mill Fairway Canyon
Armour Palmer Irwin Slurry Fairway Canyon
Irwin Armour Cul-de-Sac Slurry Fairway Canyon
Floyd Irwin Cul-de-Sac Slurry Fairway Canyon
Stockton Cherry Valley Cul-de-Sac Slurry Fairway Canyon Locke Stockton Byron Slurry Fairway Canyon
Byron Locke Stockton Slurry Fairway Canyon
Champions Ryders Cup Desert Lawn Mill Tournament Hills
Elm Eleventh Sixth Mill Town Center
Olive Ninth Eleventh Mill Town Center
Rena Olive Elm Mill Town Center
Tenth Place Olive Elm Mill Town Center
Ninth Place Olive Elm Mill Town Center
Pennsylvania Eighth Tenth Mill Town Center
Pennsylvania Tenth Eleventh Mill Town Center
Eleventh Michigan Pensylvania Mill Town Center
Cherry Eigth Eleventh Mill Town Center
Palo Alto Eighth Eureka Mill Town Center
Eureka Palo Alto Vallecito Mill Town Center
Vallecito Eighth Eureka Mill Town Center
Highland Springs Eghth Caltrans ROW Mill Market Place
Xenia Eighth Starlight Slurry Sundance
Carnation Xenia Mandrake Slurry Sundance
Freezia Queen Annes Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Dahlia Freezia Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Freezia Sea Lavendar Queen Annes Slurry Sundance
Lillies Sea Lavender Sweet Pea Slurry Sundance
Sweet Pea Lillies Sea Lavendar Slurry Sundance
Bird of Paradise Lillies Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Bouvardia Lillies Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Sea Lavendar Carnation Snapdragon Slurry Sundance
Petunia Sea Lavender Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Daffodil Sea Lavender Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Violet Daffodil Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Queen Annes Carnation Snapdragon Slurry Sundance
Caspia Queen Annes Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Snapdragon Carnation Starlight Slurry Sundance
Sea Lavender Snapdragon Tulip Slurry Sundance
Mandrake Periwinkle Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Periwinkle Mandrake Shamrock Slurry Sundance
Shamrock Periwinkle Sea Lavender Slurry Sundance
Polyanthus Mandrake Laurestine Slurry Sundance
Laurestine Polyanthus Hawthorn Slurry Sundance
Hawthorn Laurestine Shamrock Slurry Sundance
Syringa Shamrock Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Houstonia Shamrock Mistletoe Slurry Sundance
Cardamom Houstonia Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Quince Houstonia Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Quince Houstonia Sea Lavender Slurry Sundance
Liatris Sea Lavender Burgandy Rose Slurry Sundance
Burgandy Rose Liatris Ambrosia Slurry Sundance
Ambrosia Buttercup Burgandy Slurry Sundance
Saffron Burgandy Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Ardith Burgandy Cul-de-sac Slurry Sundance
Bilberry Burgandy Buttercup Slurry Sundance
Buttercup Bilberry Tiger Flower Slurry Sundance
Highland North UP ROW South UP ROW Mill Market Place
Hannon City Boundary Union Slurry Tournament Hills
Union City Boundary Hannon Slurry Tournament Hills

Page 1646 of 1702 ends

is • ± , .. s� 1
a rtr
s4 -o-Yi •.a"y tl� CIE' -- -
At'477Li "� e� h�dr l icy. 3 • ':

CITY OF BEAUMONT
Citywide Street Rehabilitation and Maintenance FY 25/26

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Page 1647 of 1702 ends

BEAUMONT 550 E. 6th Stree. Beaumont, CA 9222
(951) 769-8522
cAL,F0pNIa 'ylV' 1+V. LJran t+c are

CITY OF BEAUMONT
Citywide Street Rehabilitation and Maintenance FY 25/26

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Page 1648 of 1702 ends

\\,, Public Works Departme
.
550 E. 6th StreL
Beaumont, CA 92223
BEAUMONT (951) 769-8522
C A LI F 0 p N I A www.beaumontca.gov

N
O
h-
. -
CD
'71-
4)
O)
(0
0_

Page 1650 of 1702 ends

CITY OF BEAUMONT
Citywide Street Rehabilitation and Maintenance FY 25/26

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

Page 1651 of 1702 ends

^ublic Works Department
550 E. 6th tree
Beaumont, CA 92223
BEAUMONT (951) 769-8522
I F 0 P N I a- www.beaumontca.gov

BEAUMONT
-C A L I F O R N I A
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Robert L. Vestal, Public Works Director
Darron Usher, Principal Management Analyst
DATE June 3, 2025
SUBJECT: Acceptance and Execution of the Potrero Extension Benefit Area Reimbursement Agreement
Description Approve the Reimbursement Agreement with Potrero Extension Benefit Area developers for the cost share of the Nexus Study and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.

Background and Analysis:

On December 3, 2024, City Council received an update on the infrastructure challenges and planning efforts associated with the Potrero Extension Benefit Area (PEBA), which lies west of Pennsylvania Avenue and south of I-10. The proposed developments in this area comprise more than 30 million square feet of industrial and commercial uses, with many seeking annexation into the City of Beaumont.

To address infrastructure constraints and the need for coordinated development, the City contracted Fehr & Peers to conduct a focused Nexus Study and infrastructure delivery plan. The study evaluates roadway alignments, connection points, and cost estimates, and identifies each development's fair share of infrastructure needs. The Nexus Study was funded upfront by the City to expedite planning.

The Reimbursement Agreement formalizes cost participation from four key developers —Legacy Highlands, Beaumont Commerce Center, Inland Harbor, and Beaumont Heights —who collectively agreed to reimburse the City a combined total of $275,000. This includes $252,560 for the Nexus Study and $22,440 for associated review costs. The agreement establishes that each developer's contribution is voluntary, non-refundable, and non -reimbursable.

City staff recommends approving and executing the Reimbursement Agreement to secure reimbursement of study costs and affirm cooperative planning with the private sector for backbone infrastructure delivery.

Page 1652 of 1702 ends

Fiscal Impact:

Approval of the Reimbursement Agreement will result in the recovery of $275,000 to the City of Beaumont for costs previously advanced to support infrastructure planning in the Potrero Extension Benefit Area. This amount includes $252,560 for the Nexus Study prepared by Fehr & Peers and $22,440 for associated staff review and administrative costs. The reimbursement will restore General Fund resources used to expedite planning efforts and supports a fair -share cost distribution among participating developers. There are no additional fiscal impacts associated with executing this agreement. Please see the details below in Table 1.

Table 1. Industrial Fairshare Analysis
Industrial Development Fair share Analysis
Project Name
Total S+QF
Fair Share
Legacy Highlands
15,048,740
S150,666
Beaumont Commerce Center
6,234,338
562,417
Inland Harbor
1,037,4.48
5,146,841
S10,387
Beaumont Heights
S51,530
Total
27,467,467
S275,000
Traffic Study
Review
Total
5 252,5641
22,440
275,000
The estimated cost of preparing this staff report is $300.

Recommended Action:

Approve the Reimbursement Agreement with the Potrero Extension Benefit Area developers, and;
Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.

Attachments:

A. Reimbursement Agreement and Proposal

Page 1653 of 1702 ends

REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and effective as of the day of , 2025 ("Effective Date"), by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT ("CITY") whose address is 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223 and Inland Harbor, a corporation whose address is ; Beaumont Heights, a corporation whose address is ; Beaumont Commerce Center, a corporation whose address is ; and Legacy Highlands, a corporation whose address is (hereinafter singularly "DEVELOPER" and plurally "DEVELOPERS"). CITY and DEVELOPERS may be referred to individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties."

RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions of the parties to this Agreement:

A. DEVELOPERS desire to develop an area west of Pennsylvania Avenue and south of I-10 ("Potrero Extension Benefit Area") as illustrated in Exhibit "A". The DEVELOPERS, which are parties to this Agreement, have submitted or are in the process of submitting applications. with the CITY for several projects within the Potrero Extension Benefit Area consisting of more than 30 million square feet of industrial and commercial developments; and B. DEVELOPERS have planned to construct their projects within the Potrero Extension Benefit Area; and
C. DEVELOPERS have submitted entitlement packages and proposed infrastructure that only benefit their individual projects and do not consider the development of the Potrero Extension Benefit Area, which will be needed to mitigate in part the impacts of their proposed projects; and D. CITY and DEVELOPERS agree that there is currently insufficient infrastructure within the Potrero Extension Benefit Area to support the level of development proposed by DEVELOPERS; and
E. CITY and DEVELOPERS agree that a Nexus Study, as defined in Section 3 of this Agreement, is necessary to analyze and address the issues of street alignment as well as planning and development of cohesive master -planned facilities needed to mitigate the impacts of development within the Potrero Extension Benefit Area. CITY and DEVELOPERS further agree that the Nexus Study needs to be conducted for the benefit of DEVELOPERS to improve traffic infrastructure and facilities necessitated by their proposed developments; and 1

Page 1654 of 1702 ends

F. DEVELOPERS voluntarily agree to pay their share of the costs for the Nexus Study in the amounts specified in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (such amounts hereinafter referred to as "Reimbursement Sums of DEVELOPERS").

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and mutual covenants contained herein, CITY and DEVELOPERS agree as follows:

1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Parties accept the above recitals as true and correct and incorporate them herein as if they were fully restated in this Agreement.

2. Purpose and Scope. The primary purpose of this Agreement is to establish that DEVELOPERS are responsible for funding the cost of the Nexus Study, defined herein below, for the Potrero Extension Benefit Area.

3. Nexus Study. CITY has engaged with FEHR & PEERS, a California corporation whose address is 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 600, Walnut Creek, California 94596 to perform a focused nexus study and infrastructure delivery plan for the Potrero Extension Benefit Area. The study will consider roadway alignments, connection points, cost estimates, and other factors to ensure the area's efficient development. FEHR & PEERS proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" ("Proposal").

4. Nexus Study Cost. The CITY has initially advanced the cost of the Nexus Study.

DEVELOPERS shall reimburse the CITY for the full cost of the Nexus Study. Each developer shall pay within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date its fair share of the Nexus Study cost in the amounts set forth in Exhibit "B". The cost of the Nexus Study is Two Hundred Fifty -Two Thousand Five Hundred Sixty Dollars ($252,560.00) ("Study Cost").

4.1 Non -Reimbursable Payment. Each DEVELOPER's payment is non -reimbursable, and non-refundable, meaning that each DEVELOPER is solely responsible for paying their share of the Study Cost and such share shall not be refunded by the CITY for any reason.

5. CITY's Reservation of Rights and Discretion. Nothing in the Agreement shall grant any DEVELOPER any vested right, property right, guarantee or approval to develop their proposed project. CITY hereby expressly reserves all rights and discretion to approve or disapprove any project relating to the Potrero Extension Benefit Area. This reservation includes, but is not limited to, the right to: (i) review, evaluate, and assess any project proposal; (ii) request additional information or modifications to any project proposal; (iii) approve, conditionally approve, or deny any project proposal; (iv) impose conditions, restrictions, or requirements on any approved project; 2

Page 1655 of 1702 ends

(v) revoke or modify any previously granted approval as allowed by applicable law; and (vi) enforce compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and conditions. CITY's acceptance of DEVELOPER's voluntary payment for the Nexus Study does not constitute a waiver of any of CITY's rights, powers, or authorities. CITY retains full discretion, including but not limited to its discretion in all matters related to land use, zoning, permitting, and project approvals. Developers understand that additional and supplemental studies and analysis may be required in connection with impacts within the Potrero Extension Benefit Area.

5.1 Independent Review. Each DEVELOPER's independent project shall be reviewed and evaluated on its own merits. Prior approvals or disapprovals for similar projects shall not bind or limit the CITY's discretion in reviewing new projects.

6. DEVELOPERS Rights and Discretion.

6.1 No Guarantee. DEVELOPER's payment for the Nexus Study does not guarantee, promise, or imply any future approvals for projects or any other request that requires CITY's approval. Payment for the Nexus Study does not create any expectations of favorable treatment or expedited processing of future project applications.

6.2 Independent Payment for Nexus Study. Each DEVELOPER's payment for the Nexus Study is independent of and separate from any other obligations, deposits and fees related to that DEVELOPER's project.

7. Voluntary Participation. Each DEVELOPER hereby acknowledges and affirms that its participation in paying the Study Cost for the Nexus Study is entirely voluntary and not compelled, coerced, or mandated by CITY in any way. DEVELOPERS decision to contribute financially to the Nexus Study is made of its own free will and accord, without any undue influence, pressure, or inducement from CITY.

8. No City Imposed Conditions. CITY has not conditioned any approvals, permits, or other governmental actions on any DEVELOPER's participation in funding the Nexus Study.

9. Miscellaneous Provisions.

9.1 Entire Agreement and Modifications. This Agreement, which includes all attached exhibits, supersedes any and all previous agreements, either oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the Nexus Study and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of Study Cost. Any modifications of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by both parties. 3

Page 1656 of 1702 ends

9.2 Governing Law. This Agreement is made, entered into and shall be performed in the County of Riverside in the State of California and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced and governed under the laws of the State of California.

9.3 Venue. The Parties agree that exclusive venue for any and all legal proceedings arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be the state and federal courts located in Riverside County, California.

9.4 Severability. If any portion, section, sentence, provision or paragraph of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the entire balance of this Agreement not so affected shall remain in full force and effect.

9.5 Liability. If any one of the parties responsible for paying its fair share of the Nexus Study fails to pay such amount, the other non -defaulting Developers shall be responsible to pay the unpaid amount in proportion to their respective fair share amounts exclusive of the defaulting Developer's share. If any Developer fails to pay it prorate share of the defaulted amount it shall be in default of this Agreement and the non Defaulting Developers shall be responsible to pay in accordance with the proportionate shares of the non defaulting Developers.

9.6 Attorneys Fees. If any legal action or proceeding, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first above -written.

CITY:

CITY OF BEAUMONT
By:

DEVELOPER: DEVELOPER:

INLAND HARBOR BEAUM N HET TS
By: By: Sant
Name: Title: Name: oss Title: Manager
4

Page 1657 of 1702 ends

DEVELOPER:

BEAUMONT COMMERCE
CENTER
DEVELOPER:

LEGACY HIGHLANDS
By: By:

Name: Title:

Name: Title:
5

Page 1658 of 1702 ends

EXHIBIT "A"
(Potrero Extension Benefit Area)
Project Name
079 North
.M Fence
.ASM Beaumont Investbs
Beaumont Hits Connneme Cancer
=Inland Harbor
.Legacy Highlands
Lac Logic
.orbs Beaumont Heights
.tvchard Logistics eGtyBoundaty
o FroNct Mustang o Spheie_Of_Influence
•
.wG
r.-
1014/`a
_ 1 't
mos -Ow
I I I
MOM
n
I
0 0.35 p.7 14Miles
6 Geated By: Bradley Banhar
Date: Oct 3 2024

Page 1659 of 1702 ends

EXHIBIT "B"
(Reimbursement Sums of DEVELOPERS)
Industrial Development Fairshare Analysis
Project Name
Total SQF
Fair Share
Legacy Highlands
15,048,740
$150,666
Beaumont Commerce Center
6,234,338
$62,417
Inland Harbor
1,037,498
$10,387
Beaumont Heights
5,146,891
$51,530
Total
27,467,467
$275,000
Traffic Study
Review
Total
$ 252,560
$ 22,440
$ 275,000
7

Page 1660 of 1702 ends

EXHIBIT "C"
(FEHR & PEERS Proposal)
8

Page 1661 of 1702 ends

FEHR' PEERS
Updated October 2, 2024
Robert Vestal
Director of Public Works I City Engineer
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
Subject: South of SR 60 Roadway Infrastrcuture Delivery Plan and Fee Program Nexus Study
P23-2244-OC
Dear Robert:

This proposal reflects our recent phone conversations with City staff and our concerns related to delivering needed infrastructure in the City concurrent with industrial development in the referenced area of the City. Specifically, as we have started working with the City to review development applications generally located south of SR -60 and west of SR -79, we have realized the following:

1. The City is processing more than 30 million sq. ft. of industrial/warehousing development in this area.

2. Warehousing development trip generation can vary significantly depending on the client, with uses like High -Cube Transload and Short -Term Storage Warehouse generating daily trips at a rate of 1.4 trips per 1,000 sq. ft.; whereas General Light Industrial or High -Cube Fulfillment Center Warehouse — Sort generate between 4.87 and 6.44 trips per 1,000 sq. ft.

Given that most of the studies we have seen come through utilize the lower end of the trip rate range, it is imperative to understand how roadway capacity needs may change with more trip intensive land uses.

3. The City's General Plan identified three key roadway connections to serve this general area.

These facilities are:
a. The Potrero interchange (e.g. add ramp connections from the overcrossing to SR - 60) — recent funding of the interchange ramps will deliver this project sooner; however, there is only so much traffic this interchange can support and understanding how its capacity constrains may or may affect operations on Potrero and other streets needs to be understood
b. The extension of Potrero to the east, connecting it to SR -79 (and eventually over to the other portion of Potrero east of SR -79)
c. A new east/west roadway generally paralleling Potrero to the south d. The Beaumont Avenue interchange has limited capacity and routing trucks and passenger cars to it will increase the deficiency at that location

4. Although the traffic studies we have seen to -date have all followed the City's guidelines and generally identify spot improvements at various locations, none of them look at 3750 University Avenue Suite 225 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 274-4800 Fax (949) 859-3209 www.fehrandpeers.com

Page 1662 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont

Page 2 of 5 ends

identifying when each of these key infrastructure connections would be required to serve the proposed development. Additionally, none identify the final roadway alignment for the Potrero connection to SR -79 nor do they identify the best alignment for the new east -west roadway located south of Potrero.

5. The traffic studies assume much of this infrastructure is completed in the future without identifying how that infrastructure will be funded. As such, conceptual cost estimates for the identified roadway alignments would be helpful so that the City can start identifying a mechanism for funding and delivering the infrastructure (such as an updated transportation impact fee program or a road and bridge benefit district (RBBD)).

6. The City would benefit from a fee program/nexus study to determine new development's fair share contributions toward these projects.

The purpose of this proposal is to provide the City with services to help answer key questions noted above. Fehr & Peers has included Mark Thomas & Company to our team to assist in identifying alignment for the two east -west roadways noted above and to develop cost estimates for the proposed infrastructure.

Our proposed scope of work is described in detail below:

SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 1 — KICK OFF MEETING
The Fehr & Peers team will attend a kick-off meeting at the City with City staff. At this meeting, we will work with staff to better understand what development applications the City has received in the general study area and get a better understanding of any geometric layouts already developed for the facilities noted above. Fehr & Peers will also review any approved or submitted traffic studies in the area to better understand the availability of count data in the area.

We will work with the City to identify if they have a mechanism for controlling the tenants of the facilities after they are entitled. Specifically, if the traffic study assumed a trip generation rate of High -Cube Transload but the actual tenant is a High -Cube Fulfillment Center Warehouse — Sort, does the City have a mechanism to reassess infrastructure needs or obtain increased funding to deal with transportation needed infrastructure that would be required for the increased trips.

TASK 2 — CAPACITY MODEL ASSESSMENT
Fehr & Peers will develop a capacity model to assist in assessing the roadway capacity infrastructure.

We propose to initially look at roadway segment capacity to assist with answering some of the bigger questions of when development would occur.

Page 1663 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont

Page 3 of 5 ends

As we build the capacity model, we will work with staff to pre -build in traffic from entitled projects.

We will propose to then set up specific zones for proposed projects so that we can test different development yields (e.g. 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) that we will use to test when specific segments approach capacity and identify key facilities needed to address those capacity issues. We will also build into the assessment a two-step process; one using rates we are seeing used in the submitted traffic studies and another where more intensive uses (like Light Industrial or Fulfillment Center Warehouse — Sort) and how those assumptions change the results of the infrastructure needs.

Fehr & Peers will use some combination of a refined RIVCOM model and/or a sub -area refined trip assignment model to assist in developing the roadway network. We will use trip generation information using ITE and/or WRCOG trip rates including PCE conversion estimates to review roadway capacity at a PCE level.

Fehr & Peers will also utilize two sources for estimating the distribution of trips to/from this area.

First, we will use the RIVCOM travel demand model to assist with trip distribution estimates, but we also propose to use big data (Streetlight) to assist with this effort. Streetlight data will be used to estimate origin/distribution and trip routing for both passenger car and heavy vehicles from already developed industrial areas in the City. This will provide valuable information that will ensure that the trip distribution and trip assignment assumptions used reflect current demands in the study area. Please note that Streetlight data is available for no cost through the SCAG data portal and we have already pulled that data for our use in the City's truck route study.

Once the number of trips, distribution of trips, and routing of trips have been refined, we will include that information into our capacity assessment. Our goal would be to identify the number of trips that could be accommodated from the study area using the existing infrastructure (on a roadway segment basis) and start identifying when subsequent infrastructure would be required. These trips will be "backed into" the development utilizing the bookends of trip generation noted above to assist in planning this infrastructure in the City.

TASK 3 — ROADWAY ALIGNMENT DEVELOPMENT
Mark Thomas & Company will lead the roadway alignment assessment. scope proposes to utilize available data from Riverside County (such as contours), an assumed roadway cross-section, an assumed roadway design speed, existing utility information, and available right-of-way information to identify a potential alignment for connecting Potrero road in the study area and the best alignment for the future east -west roadway south of Potrero identified in the City's General Plan.

Once the alignments are identified, they will share that information with City staff to confirm the appropriateness of the alignment.

In addition to developing the alignments, Mark Thomas & Company will also complete a cost estimate for each facility (including review of the Potrero interchange). This will include a planning - level cost estimate, but will include assumptions for roadway costs, right -or -way estimates,

Page 1664 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont

Page 4 of 5 ends

engineering and design considerations, major drainage considerations, and a description of needed permits and environmental considerations needed to progress the projects.

TASK 4 - DOCUMENTATION
Fehr & Peers will work with the City on the most appropriate form of documentation but believe a memorandum summarizing the results of the traffic work, alignment strip maps, and planning cost estimates would be appropriate for the City to review and approve our work on Tasks 1-3.

TASK 5 - NEXUS STUDY
Fehr & Peers will utilize the information in Tasks 1-4 to develop a nexus study for this effort. The nexus study will utilize information from the City's General Plan along with estimates of development that will contribute traffic to these facilities.

Fehr & Peers will utilize the information to establish the following key components associated with impact fee programs, including:
• Rough proportionality of the fee related to the development contributing to the facility needs.
• Identification of any existing deficiencies and fair share calculations reflecting new development's fair share contribution toward those facilities. • Establishment of a metric to be used for the fee program calculation. That could be trips, passenger car equivalent trips, vehicles miles of travel, or other metric that normalizes the fee charged to new development.
• Establishment of an approach to address AB 602 requirements with the City. AB 602 requires the City to incorporate projects into their capital improvement program, update the fee every eight years, and to assure that any housing projects incorporated into the fee program address whether unit size should be accounted for in the impact fee program. • Preparation of a proposed fee schedule that can be utilized for this fee using typical land uses that would occur in the area.
• Draft and final nexus studies to be used by City staff.

SCHEDULE AND FEE
The Fehr & Peers team proposes to complete Tasks 1-5 within 20 weeks following our receipt of a work order for this effort. We will complete this effort on a time -and -materials basis for a not -to - exceed amount of $252,560 ($105,292) of which is Mark Thomas's effort for this project).

Page 1665 of 1702 ends

City of Beaumont

Page 5 of 5 ends

We look forward to our continued work with the City of Beaumont. If you have any questions, please call me directly at 949-308-6312.

Sincerely,

FEHR & PEERS
Jason D. Pack, P.E.

Principal

Page 1666 of 1702 ends

BEAUMONT
-C A L I F O R N I A
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Julie Van Hook, Public Information Officer
DATE June 3, 2025
SUBJECT: Consideration of Expanding the City's Military Banner Program to Include Veterans and Review of Suggested Donation Amount
Description In response to increasing public interest and feedback, staff is requesting Council direction to revisit the City's Military Banner Program to expand eligibility to include military veterans and review the program's current donation amount relative to actual costs.

Background and Analysis:

The City of Beaumont's Military Banner Program was established to honor active -duty military service members with personalized banners displayed along designated areas within the City. These banners, typically sponsored by family members or local organizations, are a visible sign of community recognition and support.

Allowing Veterans to participate would broaden the program's impact and acknowledge the contributions of those who have completed their service. Staff reviewed similar programs:
• Murrieta — Distinct banners for Veterans and activity duty members • Corona — Seasonal veteran displays (during November)
• Riverside — A separate Veterans Banner Program with clear criteria If the Council supports expanding the program to Veterans, staff will return with an established policy for consideration, including guidance on eligibility, banner design, and display periods.

Currently, the City requests a $250 donation per banner. However, the actual cost to the City averages about $500 per banner, including design, production, hardware, installation, and labor. The City is also responsible for replacing banners that become torn, blow down, or fade over time. The City's general fund absorbs this additional cost.

Page 1667 of 1702 ends

Fiscal Impact:

With only $5,000 budgeted for the next fiscal year, a budget amendment may be needed depending upon interest in the program and sponsorship amount.

The cost to prepare this staff report was approximately $150.

Recommended Action:

Direct staff to expand military banner program to honor Veterans.

Revise the donation model to require sponsors to contribute a one-time 50% fee of the total banner cost.

Include the updated Military Banner Program into the City's comprehensive Donation and Sponsorship Program.

Attachments:

A. Current Sample Banner

Page 1668 of 1702 ends

Attachment 1_Military Banner Example
eEwIONT HONORS

THANK YOU

FOR YOUR SERVICE
ARMY

Page 1669 of 1702 ends

BEAUMONT
-C A L I F O R N I A
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
DATE June 3, 2025
SUBJECT: Donation of $30,000 to the Beaumont Chamber of Commerce Description In lieu of planning and hosting the 2025 State of the City.

Background and Analysis:

The Beaumont Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) has historically taken the lead in organizing and hosting the City's annual State of the City address. The event provides an important opportunity to inform residents, businesses, and stakeholders about recent accomplishments, future priorities, and City leadership's strategic vision.

For 2025's event, City staff is proposing to assume full responsibility for the planning and hosting of the State of the City. This transition will allow the City to manage all aspects of the event -from messaging and presentation to logistics and execution -while also recognizing the Chamber's past efforts through a one-time financial contribution.

The proposed approach offers several advantages to the City while still honoring its partnership with the Chamber, including:
• Full control over event content and messaging, ensuring consistency with City priorities and branding
• Direct engagement with residents and businesses, enhancing transparency and civic pride
• Strengthened visibility of City leadership and accomplishments to a broad audience
• Potential cost recovery through sponsorships and ticket sales • Improved coordination among City departments, increasing efficiency and event quality
Potential revenue sources include:
• Sponsorship = $40,000
• Ticket Sales = $10,000
Potential expenditures include:

Page 1670 of 1702 ends

• Chamber donation = $30,000 ($5,800 is included in FY 25/26 budget) • Venue = $120 (cleaning fee only)
• Decorations = $6,000
• Stationary (invitations, programs, etc.) = $1,200
• Photo/AV = $33,000 (included in FY 25/26 budget)
• Advertising = $500 (included in FY 25/26 budget)
• Table rentals = $600
• Catering/Food = $16,000
Total cost = $87,420
Net cost after potential revenue = $37,420, all of which is already included in the FY 25/26 budget.

Transitioning the State of the City event to a City -led model enhances control, coordination, and community engagement. At the same time, the one-time donation to the Chamber acknowledges their years of service and continued role as a valued partner in promoting local business and civic pride.

Fiscal Impact:

The one-time $30,000 donation will be funded through FY 25/26 100-1050-7034. Event revenue may offset some budgeted expenses depending on sponsorship and ticket sales success.

Recommended Action:

Approve a one-time donation of $30,000 to the Beaumont Chamber of Commerce in recognition of their past efforts and support of economic development; and Authorize staff to plan and host the 2025 State of the City event.

Page 1671 of 1702 ends

BEAUMONT
-C A L I F O R N I A
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Elizabeth Gibbs, City Manager
DATE June 3, 2025
SUBJECT: Stewart Park Improvement Project Phase II — Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Grant Update
Description Strategic Plan Target 5 Goal — Quality of Life & Community Well Being — Goal 5.2, Complete the Construction of Stewart Park.

Background and Analysis:

On June 18, 2024, the City Council approved an amendment to the City's five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to allocate $3.1 million in funding for the construction of Phase II improvements at Stewart Park, intended to be used as a local match for the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership (ORLP) program. On July 8, 2024, Phase I construction commenced under a Public Works Agreement with Act 1 Construction Inc., following a public bid process.

In October 2024, the City was notified that it had been selected as one of fifteen California projects to move forward in the post -selection process for an ORLP award.

This step involves completing Post Selection Federal Requirements, including NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) and Section 106 (National Historic Preservation Act) reviews. The grant funding agreement will not be executed —and no federal funds will be disbursed —until these compliance items are completed and approved by the National Park Service (NPS).

While the City structured the project in two phases for internal budgeting and scheduling purposes, City staff recently learned that NPS and OGALS consider the entire Stewart Park project area a single undertaking subject to federal compliance requirements.

Therefore, under federal guidelines, no ground -disturbing activity (including grading, demolition, and trenching) was permitted anywhere within the park boundary until NEPA and Section 106 reviews were complete. Unfortunately, Phase I construction included substantial ground -disturbing activities such as demolition of park amenities, rough grading, trenching for utilities, and underground conduit installation. This activity began prior to federal clearance, and thus potentially placed the grant award at risk.

Page 1672 of 1702 ends

City staff met with OGALS and ORLP representatives on April 29, 2025, to discuss the Stewart Park project. At that meeting, OGALS formally requested that the City pause all construction activity within Stewart Park until NEPA and Section 106 compliance reviews are complete. The City remains committed to working collaboratively with OGALS and NPS to preserve the $3.1 million ORLP grant. OGALS staff have also committed to working with the City to ensure the grant requirements are fulfilled.

As of May 23, 2025, City staff, in collaboration with environmental consultant PlaceWorks, submitted the required NEPA and Section 106 documentation to OGALS.

This included the Cultural Assessment Report, Environmental Evaluation, and the Notice of Exemption (NOE). Once OGALS completes their review, they will forward these materials to the appropriate federal agencies. The current estimated processing timeline for review and clearance is 60-90 days, depending on federal staffing and agency workload. However, it should be noted that OGALS may take up to 90 days to forward the materials to the appropriate federal agencies.

City staff has also met with our federal lobbyist, David Turch & Associates, who in turn reached out to NPS staff for assistance and guidance in ensuring that the NEPA and Section 106 documents are highly prioritized since this now has become an emergent issue. An email was sent to NPS on May 30th requesting an immediate meeting and staff is awaiting a response. Other contact with state and congressional representatives is pending at the time of this writing.

OGALS staff has confirmed in writing that NPS could award projects as soon as September OR may award projects later than November. Once OGALS receives the Notices of Award, they will create a state contract to be sent promptly to the City for execution. OGALS has confirmed that once the City executes the agreement, construction can begin. The turnaround time for the contract can be as quickly as two weeks.

Timeline Summary
• November 2023: City Council approves splitting the Stewart Park project into two phases to accommodate budgetary limitations.
• December 2023: The ORLP funding opportunity is announced, and City staff begin pursuing the grant in alignment with the phased project approach. • April 2024: Application submitted for ORLP Round 7.
• June 2024: City Council allocates funding for Phase I I . • July 2024: Phase I construction begins.
• October 2024: City selected by NPS and begins post -award process. • November 2024: Environmental contract approved with PlaceWorks.

Page 1673 of 1702 ends

• April 29, 2025: OGALS requests construction pause.
• May 22, 2025: City Manager met with OGALS team to discuss options. • May 23, 2025: NEPA and Section 106 documents submitted to OGALS.

Implications
While OGALS staff conveyed a willingness to collaborate and help preserve the $3.1 million grant award, they stressed that continuation of Phase 1 construction could jeopardize the ORLP grant funding. This poses a substantial risk to project timelines, community expectations, and the overall redevelopment of Stewart Park.

Additionally, it is important to note that the current federal administration has signaled a willingness to withhold or limit federal funding to California and other states due to policy and regulatory disagreements. While no specific actions have yet been taken that would impact the ORLP grant, this evolving federal landscape introduces additional risk to the City's funding strategy for Stewart Park. Staff will continue to monitor federal developments and work closely with OGALS and NPS to safeguard the grant award and protect the City's interests.

Pro'ect Options for Consideration
In light of federal compliance requirements associated with the ORLP grant, staff has outlined various options for City Council consideration. Each option reflects a different approach to balancing grant eligibility, project timelines, and available funding.

Regardless of the option selected, the City will need to proceed with a formal bidding process for Phase II improvements.
• Option 1 — Pause All Construction Activity:

Direct staff to temporarily pause construction activities within the Stewart Park boundary effective June 4th until an agreement is signed by the City. This approach maximizes the City's ability to retain the $3.1 million ORLP grant but will result in project delays and an estimated cost increase of $280,000 related to Phase I contractor demobilization and scheduling impacts.
• Option 2 — Continue Construction with Full Understanding of Grant Risk Direct staff to continue Phase I construction activities as scheduled while NEPA and Section 106 reviews are underway. However, based on guidance received from OGALS and in consideration of federal grant compliance standards, this approach presents a high risk of grant forfeiture. In the meeting on May 23rd, staff inquired about possible negative impact to the City's standing in future federal grant programs and OGALS responded that no impact exists. Should funding be forfeited, the City would need to proceed with either Option 3 or 4.

Page 1674 of 1702 ends

• Option 3 — Revise Phase II Scope to Fit Existing Budget:

Direct staff to formally withdraw from the ORLP grant process and proceed with completing Phase I construction. Staff would bid a revised Phase II project that fits within the existing $3.1 million budget and possible create Phase I I I for Council consideration. Any remaining Phase I funds would be maximized to include as many community amenities as possible, and unfunded items would be deferred to a future project phase.
• Option 4 — Advance Full Phase II Scope and Secure Additional Funding:

Direct staff to formally withdraw from the ORLP grant process and continue with Phase I construction. Staff would then proceed with bidding the full Phase II scope as originally envisioned. Upon receiving bids, staff would explore potential funding solutions to address any shortfall resulting from the loss of the ORLP grant. While this option allows the complete project to move forward as planned, it would likely require financial commitment from the City. Pursuing new grant funding may not be conducive to the project timeline or structure, as most funding programs require similar pre -construction compliance and are generally not intended to support projects already underway.

Summary
Stewart Park is a highly visible and valued community project. It has been a public park since 1939 and is centrally located in an underserved area. Construction of new amenities is a key expectation among residents. Staff continues to engage in good -faith efforts to preserve the ORLP funding while honoring federal compliance requirements. If funding is forfeited, the City would need to reassess project phasing and seek alternative resources.

City leadership has remained in regular contact with OGALS, and the City Manager's meeting on May 23rd confirmed that, while the situation is serious, a continued commitment to compliance may still preserve the award. Staff remains optimistic that NPS will allow the project to proceed following review of the City's submission and that the community will ultimately benefit from both the completed improvements and the retention of federal funding.

Fiscal Impact:

Depending on Council's direction there may be a need to allocate additional funds to complete the Stewart Park Improvement Project.

During the formal bid process for Stewart Park Improvements Phase I, staff requested an alternative bid for Phase II work and the bids received ranged from $4,372,000 to $7,225,000.

Page 1675 of 1702 ends

Currently there is $3,100,000 available in CIP P24-01 Stewart Park Phase I I.

Recommended Action:

Staff recommends City Council opt for Option 1 — Pause All Construction Activity effective June 4th until such time as the City has executed the agreement, per OGALS staff.

Attachments:

A. Stewart Park Grant Application
B. Letter of Commitment — April 16, 2024
C. ORPL Budget Phase II

Page 1676 of 1702 ends

California Department of Parks and Recreation Powered by Submittable [) Title
City of Beaumont - Stewart Park
Renovation Phase II
by Brittany Navas H Outdoor Recreation Legacy
Partnership (ORLP) Round 7 - 2024 California
Process
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, California
92223
CA
United States
9517698520
[email protected]
01/31/2024
id. 45388411
Original Submission 01/31/2024
Score
Agency Name -
Project Name
City of Beaumont - Stewart Park Renovation Phase II
Agency Name City of Beaumont
Project Name Stewart Park Renovation Phase II
Grant Request 3204300.0
Amount
Committed Match 3204300.0
Amount
Total Project Cost 6408600.0
Amount
Eligibility Screening

1. Project Site Location in incorporated City/Town with at least 30,000 People This federal program is for projects in incorporated cities or towns with at least 30,000 people. To enable California's ORLP Review Team to assess if the project is in a City/Town with a population of at least 30,000 residents, provide the Project Site Address. If the site does not have a street address, create a hyperlink to the Google Map location of the project site. The project is in an city or town of at least 30,000 people = Eligible The project is not in an city or town of at least 30,000 people = Ineligible Does the project site No
have an address?

Page 1677 of 1702 ends

Please provide a link https://maps.app.goo.gl/QXX32BZ1 FjgA26KH7 to the project site
location using a
dropped pin in
Google Maps:

Number of people
living in the project's
city/town:
56,349

3. Eligible Census Tract Projects must be located within a Census tract that is determined to be disadvantaged per the Climate and Environmental Justice Screening Tool at https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov . Use the Tool to determine whether the project site is located within a disadvantaged census tract. Enter the project site address into the search bar at the top of the map. A disadvantaged census tract will be highlighted in blue on the map. Upload a screenshot below of the map and the top right corner where it states that the census tract is identified as disadvantaged.

The project is in a census tract identified by
https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov as disadvantaged = Eligible The project is not in a census tract identified by
https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov as disadvantaged = Ineligible See sample of eligible census tract below:

Screen Shot of Project's Census Tract Using The Climate and Environmental Justice Screening Tool
Disadvantaged_Screenshot_-_Stewart_Park.pdf

4. Committed Funds (match and reimbursement process) This federal program is a reimbursement only program and requires the applicant cash - flow 100% of the total project costs, with the understanding that ORLP can reimburse up to 50% of the total project cost. For example, for a $30 million project where the applicant is seeking a $15 million reimbursement in ORLP grant funding, the applicant must certify they have committed funds to complete the $30 million project. All non-federal (state, local, or private) sources are eligible. The only federal sources that are eligible as match for this program are Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act funding, and Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration Program (REPI) funding. For purpose of this proposal, "committed" means the money is already secured. Below, list each committed funding source and dollar amount of that source.

Committed Funds The applicant listed and certified eligible sources for both reimbursement and the minimum 50% match to equal the total project cost, with the understanding that ORLP can reimburse up to 50% of the total project cost = Eligible Committed funds are not available or more fundraising will be needed = Ineligible

Page 1678 of 1702 ends

Reimbursable
Cashflow Source:

What funding
source(s) is
proposed that will be
reimbursed by the
ORLP grant (up to
50% of the total
project cost)?
The City's municipal policy requires the City to maintain 16% of annual operating for a working cash flow reserve. This reserve serves as a buffer until receipts and reimbursements are received. The amount for FY24 is $10.85M.

Match Source: What
funding source(s) is
proposed that will be
used as match for
the ORLP grant (no
less than 50% of the
total project cost)?
At the January 16, 2024 Beaumont City Council meeting, council members approved a budget amendment to the Capital Improvement Plan allocating up to $3,500,000 in funding to serve as a match for this grant proposal.

Total Reimbursable
Amount to Cashflow
ORLP Grant:
3204300.0
Total Committed
Match Amount:
3204300.0
Total Project Cost:
6408600.0

4. Timeline Confirmation Here the applicant is certifying the timeline estimate for this federal grant program is understood. This program requires states to receive, review, and process applications before the applications may be forwarded to National Park Service to enter a national competition per the following timeline estimate: For Round 7: Application Deadline is January 31, 2024. California's OGALS Team will conduct its internal competitive review process. From March through April 2024, applicants with the most competitive applications will receive guidance from California's OGALS Team in consultation with NPS on how to complete the full federal application. NPS requires that all states submit their selected applications for the national competition by NPS' April 30, 2024 deadline.

NPS review committee's estimated selection date is November 1, 2024. If selected, NPS' review committee selects the application, applicants must complete the Post Selection Federal Requirements before NPS will issue a funding agreement. This process generally takes one year to complete.

Applicant should plan to complete project within 3 years from NPS' funding agreement. Timeline confirmation: Certifying understanding of the timeline = Eligible Applicant is unable to confirm the timeline is feasible = Ineligible

Page 1679 of 1702 ends

On behalf of the
applicant, I certify
that the project and
matching funds can
work within the
timeline estimate for
Round 7, as noted
above. Our agency
understands a grant
agreement must be
signed before the
project can proceed
with land acquisition
or development.
checked

5. Confirmation of Land Ownership for Public Outdoor Recreation in Perpetuity Here the applicant is certifying it will own the project property and agrees it will remain as a park for the public's benefit in perpetuity. This federal program is subject to 54 U.S.C. 200.305.f.3. of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act, which provides a source of protection to set aside land for public recreational benefits. Confirming land ownership and outdoor use in perpetuity: Certifying the land will be owned by the grant applicant and used for public outdoor recreation in perpetuity = Eligible Applicant is unable to confirm = Ineligible
On behalf of the
applicant, I certify
that the entire project
site is owned (or will
be acquired) by the
grant applicant.
checked
On behalf of the
applicant, I certify
that the entire park
will be placed under
federal protection for
outdoor recreational
use in perpetuity
should the grant be
awarded by NPS.

This means the site,
if funded, shall be
owned by our
agency, and remain
for outdoor
recreation use in
perpetuity.
checked
Selection Criteria
Project Summary Applicants should use this section to provide a summary of the proposed project deliverables. This summary is not scored.

Page 1680 of 1702 ends

Project Summary and Nestled in the heart of the City of Beaumont, Stewart Park has served Notes: multiple generations of residents as a recreational and communal space for the surrounding neighborhood since 1941. Stewart Park maintains a rich history as a community gathering point, hosting festivals, concerts, and the city's annual 4th of July celebration. However, the park is currently characterized by its lack of recreational features and poor state of repair.

The stage and pavilion had to be removed along with the community pool due to maintenance costs and needed repairs. The skate park is in need of replacement to upgrade to current standards and updated skate amenities.

The park is divided into three separate lots by 9th Street and 10th Street and access to the park is limited due to the lack of ADA pathways to traverse throughout the park. In 2021, the city initiated a comprehensive revitalization of Stewart Park. The new vision for Stewart Park was formed by an extensive community engagement process to ensure the project reflected the hopes and desires of its residents. During the summer of 2022, staff conducted surveys at events held at Stewart Park to engage residents during recreation to seek their feedback on what they would like to see. Additionally, staff visited nearby, low-income housing to engage residents who have a high investment in what their neighborhood park offers. A community -wide survey, flyers, and one-on-one engagements were offered in English and Spanish to ensure feedback was inclusive and reflective of the community we serve. Social media updates, collaboration with the school district, and regular City Council communications ensured widespread awareness of the project and its updates. The resulting project will transform Stewart Park into a jewel and source of pride for the surrounding community. This grand vision for Stewart Park includes the construction of two new playgrounds, basketball courts, picnic areas, a skate park, an outdoor stage, a splash pad, new accessible walkways, and the planting of new trees. Additionally, the new design will remove the dividing segments that separate the park into three separate lots and create a unified green space. The City of Beaumont is requesting Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership program funding to complete Phase II of the project, which includes construction of the older youth playground, basketball/pickleball courts, group picnic shelters, the skate park, the outdoor stage, the remaining accessible pathways, and additional tree planting. Currently the city only has enough local funding to complete the proposed Phase I. Funding from ORLP will enable the city to complete the second and final phase of the project. The city is working to complete NEPA and Section 106 clearance for both Phase I and Phase II prior to the start of construction. Stewart Park serves Census Tract 06065043900 (6,698 residents) and Census Tract 06065044000 (1,734 residents).

These tracts qualify as disadvantaged using the EPA's Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool and are classified as "park poor" by OGALS because there are fewer than 3 acres of park space per 1,000 residents.

Project Site Photos
Beaumont_Stewart_Park_Site_Photos.pdf
Criteria 1: Project Benefits
Criteria 1A: Type of Project

Page 1681 of 1702 ends

1.A - Type of Project In the first part of the section, the applicant will select one of the following project types. "New Park" means the project site has not been a public park in the past, and if the grant is awarded, the project will acquire land for or develop a new public park where one currently does not exist. "Expand Existing Park" means the project includes adding acreage to increase the official boundaries of an existing park. The project may also include improvements within the existing park boundary. "Improve Park / No Expansion" means the project will take place within the existing park boundary, and does not involve adding acreage to increase the size of the park boundary. Points for Type of Project New Park = 10 points Expand Existing Park = 7 points Improve Existing Park/No Expansion = 5 points The project will not create, expand, or improve a park = Ineligible What type of project
is proposed?
Expand Existing Park

1.B - New Outdoor Recreation Features While renovations of existing features can be part of the project, the purpose of this section is to check what new outdoor recreation features are proposed, as this will make the project more competitive to the National Review Committee. The new recreation feature(s) must be outdoors. How will the project's new recreation features create a large impact on the target community by significantly increasing the number of people or user groups who could be served? Points for New Recreation Features Four or More New Outdoor Recreation Features are proposed = 20 points Three New Outdoor Recreation Features are proposed = 15 points Two New Outdoor Recreation Features are proposed = 10 points One New Outdoor Recreation Features is proposed = 5 points The project only involves renovation of existing features = 0 points
Will the proposed
project involve the
creation of a new
outdoor recreation
feature?
Yes
New Feature #1:

Identify the type of
proposed new
outdoor recreation
feature. Why is this
feature determined to
be a high priority for
the park to attract
more use?
According to the community survey, new playground facilities were a high priority for residents, with playground amenities for ages 5 - 12 scoring as the second highest ranked priority feature. Phase II will include construction of this playground, providing older children with a separate amenity located next to the skate park. This playground will be tailored to parkour activities with netting to provide appropriate safety measures. The park aims to create a communal space tailored for older children while promoting physical well-being through activities that enhance balance and flexibility.

Will the proposed
project involve the
creation of another
new outdoor
recreation feature?
Yes

Page 1682 of 1702 ends

New Feature #2:

Identify the type of
proposed new
outdoor recreation
feature. Why is this
feature determined to
be a high priority for
the park to attract
more use?
Landscaping and lighting improvements were identified as the fourth highest ranked priority in the community survey. Stewart Park would benefit greatly by landscape and lighting improvements. Much of the parkland consists either of large dirt patches or grassy areas with bare spots, and lighting fixtures are minimal. Phase II of the renovation includes the installation of new lighting features, creation of the largest open grass area, and planting the majority of trees for the new Stewart Park.

Will the proposed
project involve the
creation of another
new outdoor
recreation feature?
Yes
New Feature #3:

Identify the type of
proposed new
outdoor recreation
feature. Why is this
feature determined to
be a high priority for
the park to attract
more use?
Stewart Park's transformation prioritizes walking trails, ranked fifth in the community survey. Currently, the park features a paved walkway between 10th and 11th Street, however, the revitalized park will expand this significantly. The redesign includes a new walking loop on the eastern end as well as a paved, accessible route throughout the entirety of the park, catering to individuals with mobility disabilities. Phase II has a commitment to ADA compliance, and will introduce 7,027 linear feet of new pathways, fostering inclusivity. These renovations aim to transform Stewart Park into an accessible and diverse recreational space for all ages and abilities.

Will the proposed
project involve the
creation of another
new outdoor
recreation feature?
Yes
New Feature #4:

Identify the type of
proposed new
outdoor recreation
feature. Why is this
feature determined to
be a high priority for
the park to attract
more use?
Phase II of the Stewart Park Renovation project includes new active recreation facilities. This includes significant upgrades to the existing skatepark and replacement of two weathered basketball courts with new multi -functional courts that can be used for basketball and pickleball. These two amenities ranked ninth and tenth respectively in the community survey.

While not the highest priority in the survey ranking, through engagement efforts it was found that there was sufficient community support for an upgraded skatepark to be included in the design.

Will the proposed
project involve the
creation of another
new outdoor
recreation feature?
No

Page 1683 of 1702 ends

1.C - Green Space The purpose of this section is to determine how the project will increase access to nature by creating new green spaces, nature themed recreation features (natural playgrounds, community gardens, etc.), shady areas (via tree cover), and natural landscapes that help cool the air and reduce urban heat island effects, reduce pollution, and have positive effects on mental and physical health. Use the text box below to describe how the project will create new green spaces, natural landscapes, and tree cover. Points for Green Space: The project creates substantial new green spaces, natural themed recreation features and landscapes, and tree cover compared to other statewide applications = 15 points The project creates moderate new green spaces, compared to other statewide applications = 10 points The project creates minimal new green spaces compared to other statewide applications = 5 points The project does not create new green spaces compared to other statewide applications = 0 points
Does the project
create new green
spaces, natural
themed recreation
features and
landscapes, and tree
cover?
Yes
How will the project
create new green
spaces, natural
landscapes, and tree
cover?
In totality, the Stewart Park Renovation project includes the creation of 245,785 square feet of open grassy area and will add 142 new trees. In 2015, CaIEPA's Urban Heat Island Index study found that the Inland Empire's urban heat island effect was so intense that it skewed the statewide map's overall scale. As the impacts of climate change accelerate, new tree canopy to combat urban heat island effect will be essential for communities like Beaumont. The new open area will serve as a multi -use field for soccer practices and other athletics.

Criteria 3: SCORP Priorities

Page 1684 of 1702 ends

3 - SCORP Priorities Select the applicable SCORP Priority boxes below and describe how this project meets that/those priority(s). Consider this guidance: New Park Access - All projects that qualify as a "new park" or "expanding an existing park" will satisfy this SCORP priority because the project is adding/increasing park acreage in a community. Preservation - If part or all of the project site has not previously been funded by the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF), it will meet this SCORP priority.

This is because if the grant is awarded, the grantee will commit to preserve the park for public outdoor recreational use in perpetuity. An existing park, park expansion, or new park can qualify for this. Multi -Use Parks for All Ages — Projects will be a fit for this priority if they are designed to bring families together by supporting art and music, sports, and multi - generational activities; support different active and passive recreation interests of all ages; and incorporate project design ideas from all age groups. Health Design Goals — If the project results from asking community members for their park design ideas for public health, this priority will apply.

Safety and Beautification — If the project includes at least one enhancement for safety and one for beautification, it will meet this SCORP Priority. For safety, the project may include lighting for night-time/longer use or other enhancements to improve the use of the feature. For beautification, landscaping can enhance the project's appearance and make this area of the park appear more welcoming. Note that National Park Service will not fund public art enhancements. Points for Meeting 2021- 2025 SCORP Priorities All Five SCORP Priorities will be met between the project elements = 15 points Four SCORP Priorities will be met between the project elements = 12 points Three SCORP Priorities will be met between the project elements = 9 points Two SCORP Priorities will be met between the project elements = 6 points One SCORP Priority will be met between the project elements = 3 points No SCORP Priority will be met = 0 points and will not be recommended for funding
Which SCORP
Priority(s) will this
project meet?
New Park Access
Preservation
Multi -Use Parks for All Ages
Health Design Goals
Safety and Beautification
How does the project
meet the SCORP
Priority for New Park
Access?
This project will expand Stewart Park by creating 46,938 square feet of additional park space in Phases I and II by removing segments of 9th Street and 10th Street that currently run through the park.

How does the project
meet the SCORP
Priority for
Preservation?
The Stewart Park Renovation project meets SCORP Priority for Preservation and will remain in compliance with Section 6(f)(3) of the LWCF Act, should it secure the ORLP grant. Notably, Stewart Park has not received LWCF funding previously, making it eligible for SCORP Priority for Preservation through this expansion and revitalization initiative. The City is committed to ensuring perpetual public outdoor recreational use, as well as creating green spaces and planting new trees. The project enhances the park while addressing community needs and environmental concerns by combating the urban heat island effect in the Inland Empire, fostering a sustainable community space.

Page 1685 of 1702 ends

How does the project
meet the SCORP
Priority for Multi -Use
Parks for All Ages?
Stewart Park's inclusive design fosters community bonds, supports music, sports, and multi -generational activities. Building on its history of hosting events, the redesign enriches the space for diverse interests. This multi- use park embraces active and passive recreation for all ages, with upgraded facilities in Phase II such as an improved skatepark and versatile courts for basketball and pickleball. The expansive walking trails cater to community members of all ages and abilities, complementing the playgrounds for children of varying age groups. Stewart Park will emerge as a vibrant, inclusive destination for the entire community.

How does the project
meet the SCORP
Priority for Health
Design Goals?
The community survey asked respondents to state how strongly they agreed with the following statement: "the park should include healthy lifestyle outdoor fitness areas designed for free and safe exercise for all members of the community." Residents overwhelmingly agreed or strongly agreed with this statement, and the expressed desire for amenities that promote healthy lifestyles informed the project's design. In totality, the project will construct 5,012 linear feet walking path to encourage active and healthy lifestyles. Further enhancements include upgrading the skatepark and replacing worn basketball courts with versatile spaces accommodating both basketball and pickleball.

How does the project
meet the SCORP
Priority for Safety
and Beautification?
The Stewart Park Renovation project prioritizes both safe public use and beautification. Landscaping is a central focus, completely overhauling the park and adding 245,785 square feet of open grassy area and 142 new trees. These enhancements will transform large dirt patches into a more inviting, community atmosphere. Safety improvements include the installation of new lighting features along walking paths and athletic courts, significantly enhancing visibility throughout the park. Phase II features a new playground for older children, designed for parkour activities with netting for added safety, aligning with the community's desire for a secure and aesthetically pleasing recreational space.

Agency Certification and Contact Person In this final section, the contact person is certifying an understanding that the proposal will go through a state competitive process, and the proposal is authorized on behalf of the applicant's agency. California's OGALS Team may ask the contact person project related questions.

Contact/Certifier
Name
Position/Title
Email
Phone Number
Brittany
Navas
Grants Analyst
[email protected]
+19097698520

Page 1686 of 1702 ends

I understand that the checked
State Parks Office of
Grants and Local
Services Competitive
Review Process will
use the above
information to rank all
statewide ORLP
proposals and select
the most competitive
proposals for ORLP
Round 7 as
explained at
vvvvw.parks.ca.gov/orlp.

I also certify that I
am authorized to
submit this proposal
on behalf of the grant
applicant.

Final Reminders Please only click the submit button below when you are ready to submit your proposal. If there is no blue submit application button, you are not the account owner and will not be able to submit the application. All required fields (indicated by a red asterisk*) must be complete before the proposal can be submitted. Responses must be complete and submitted before January 31, 2024 at 5:00 p.m. Additional documents will not be accepted after the deadline unless requested by OGALS. If you have any questions you can email your Competitive Review Project Officer for the project's county. In all cases the Submit button below must be clicked before January 31, 2024 at 5:00 p.m. Thank you for your interest in the ORLP California Process!

Page 1687 of 1702 ends

BEAUMONT
-c A L I F O R N I A -
April 16, 2024
To Whom it May Concern,
I am writing on behalf of the City Council of Beaumont to express our full endorsement and support for securing grant funding for Phase II of the Stewart Park Improvement Project through the Outdoor Legacy Recreation Program (ORLP).

The City Council is committed to advancing the revitalization of Stewart Park, a key initiative aligning with the City of Beaumont's Strategic Plan Goal Target #5: Quality of Life/Well-Being and Goal #7: Complete Stewart Park. Our city takes pride in offering parks and recreation services that cater to the diverse needs of every citizen. To further enhance the quality of life for our residents and accommodate the growth of our community, Beaumont has embarked on a comprehensive renovation of Stewart Park located in downtown Beaumont.

This renovation is the most significant undertaking for the 11 -acre park since its acquisition and development in 1939. Phase II of the project includes essential amenities such as multi - generational playground equipment, basketball/pickleball courts, a stage, group picnic shelters, skate park improvements, tiled entry plazas, accessible pathways, and additional landscaping enhancements. With the design for this phase now 100% complete, we are eager to proceed with the implementation of these improvements. Stewart Park will be transformed into a dynamic destination for families of all ages, offering recreational opportunities and fostering a sense of community.

In our pursuit of securing grant funding for this pivotal project, I am pleased to inform you that the Community Services Department is taking proactive measures by reallocating funds from other projects to fulfill the City's required match. This strategic initiative not only ensures compliance with the grant requirement but also optimizes the utilization of our internal resources. A comprehensive Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) amendment detailing this reallocation will be presented to City Council on May 7, 2024.

Given the total estimated cost of Phase II amounting to approximately $6.2M, the City Council recognizes the importance of securing external funding to complement our investment in this project. Therefore, we fully endorse the approach of seeking grant funding to cover 50% of the project costs, with the City providing a matching contribution.

Thank you for considering our application for grant funding, and we look forward to the opportunity to collaborate with the National Parks Association on this transformative initiative.

Sincerely,
David Fenn
Mayor
City of Beaumont 1550 E. 6th Street, 1i 8gAf}f2' ®2 (951) 769-8520 I BeaumontCA.gov

Cost Categories -
Unit of Measure & If Pre -Agreement $ subject to 25%
Cost Per Unit Federal Share Match Share Total Cost Cost - Dates budget cost # of Units
Incurred restrictions

1. Administration and Legal expenses
Grant Administration
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

2. Land, Structures, Rights -of -Way, Appraisals
$0.00

3. Relocation Expenses and Payments
$0.00
$0.00

4. Architectural and Engineering Fees
Enigneered design
$0.00
$0.00

5. Other Architectural and Engineering Fees
Conceptual drawing
$0.00
$0.00

6. Project Inspection Fees
Electrical inspection - city
$0.00
$0.00

7. Site Work
Grading
1 $ 160,183.00
$ 80,091.50
$ 80,091.50
$ 160,183.00
Contingency(10%)
1 $ 16,018.00
$ 8,009.00
$ 8,009.00
$ 16,018.00

8. Demolition and Removal
Demolition and removal of existing infrastructu
1 $ 50,410.00
$ 25,205.00
$ 25,205.00
$ 50,410.00
Contingency(10%)
1 $ 5,041.00
$ 2,520.50
$ 2,520.50
$ 5,041.00

9. Construction
Permanent Equipment; Playgrounds, Tables,
Basketball, Pickleball, Benches, Skate Park,
trash receptacles, other seating
1 $ 3,756,245.00
$ 1,878,122.50
$ 1,878,122.50
$ 3,756,245.00
Landscaping throughout the park - bushes,
shrubs, trees, turf
1 $ 659,247.00
$ 329,623.50
$ 329,623.50
$659,247.00
Irrigation throughout the park - water sensors,
timers, piping, installation costs
1 $ 272,450.00
$ 136,225.00
$ 136,225.00
$272,450.00
Electrical Improvements
1 $ 135,060.00
$67,530.00
$67,530.00
$135,060.00
Concrete, paving, foundation work
1 $ 602,866.00
$301,433.00
$301,433.00
$602,866.00
Contingency(10%)
1 $ 542,480.00
$ 271,240.00
$ 271,240.00
$542,480.00

10. Equipment
$0.00

11. Miscellaneous *
$0.001
$0.00

12. Contingencies**
Contingencies budgeted within each category.
$0.00

13. Indirect Costs
n/a

GRAND TOTAL
Totals above must be less than or equal to:
$0.00
$3,100,000.00 $3,100,000.00 $6,200,000.00
$3,100,000.00
Matching Share Contributors (Name and
funding source):

Match
Amount/Value
Type (cash,
donated land,
etc.)
Is Match Secure or firmly committed. If committed,
list date expected to be secured.

City of Beaumont General Fund $ 3,100,000.00 cash Yes, 4/16/2024

GRAND TOTAL
$ 3,100,000.00
$0.00
$1,550,000.00

Page 1689 of 1702 ends

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
Beginning Fund Balance
(unaudited)
FY 2025 Budgeted April Activity FYTD 2025 Actual
Revenues Receipts
FY 2025 Budgeted April Activity FD 2025 Actual YT
Expenditures Disbursements
% T/D Ending Fund
Balance
100 GENERAL FUND 41,960,431.31 69,405,070.00 5,287,305.12 55,016,949.76 79% 80,293,700.00 2,183,690.41 42,094,004.01 52% 54,883,377.06 120 SELF INSURANCE 6,898,220.84 160,000.00 20,094.23 224,088.29 0% 230,820.00 - 210,818.85 0% 6,911,490.28 200 GAS TAX 140,030.09 1,565,135.00 126,940.73 1,286,190.72 82% 1,565,135.00 934,008.08 60% 492,212.73 201 SB1 2,712,032.90 1,449,419.00 129,625.35 1,260,193.70 87% 2,349,111.00 900,890.00 38% 3,071,336.60 202 MEASURE A 2,310,642.29 923,257.00 71,946.33 684,101.52 74% 1,534,800.00 688,001.00 45% 2,306,742.81 205 AQMD 248,371.12 71,431.00 647.35 64,644.71 90% 265,500.00 - 93,274.73 0% 219,741.10 210 PEG 42,675.23 12,367.00 119.88 6,651.37 54% 23,934.40 - 8,634.40 0% 40,692.20 215 CDBG/GRANTS 91,549.17 6,357,565.00 9,352.27 628,772.83 10% 10,588,091.00 979,875.45 1,396,081.81 13% (675,759.81) 220 COPS 530,104.40 105,237.00 43,077.14 229,155.38 218% 343,467.00 7,642.08 248,165.83 72% 511,093.95 225 ASSET SEIZURES (STATE) 303,353.90 2,944.00 364.53 25,328.21 0% 286,462.00 9,664.72 218,799.96 0% 109,882.15 230 ASSET SEIZURES (FEDERAL) 100,705.72 597.00 352.81 20,633.94 0% 0% 121,339.66 240 OTHER FUNDS 522,798.79 75,756.00 2,004.81 125,738.95 166% 257,145.22 - 112,776.66 44% 535,761.08 250 CFD-ADMIN 1,367,147.35 1,366,197.00 4,330.91 1,057,595.68 77% 1,713,672.00 17,130.09 1,107,133.36 65% 1,317,609.67 255 CFD-MAINT SVCS 258,933.93 4,811,910.00 4,271.56 2,826,488.01 59% 5,346,769.00 67995 1,703,438.50 32% 1,381,983.44 260 CFD-PUBLIC SAFETY 552,116.41 1,589,899.00 2,213.53 993,225.95 62% 1,587,924.00 - 793,962.00 50% 751,380.36 500 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 51,057,566.07 139,703,835.00 6,455,330.52 15,853,972.62 11% 178,180,230.00 1,694,749.60 18,837,087.52 11% 48,074,451.17 510 CFD CAPITAL PROJECTS 12,616,801.13 2,127.00 30,085.03 367,731.25 0% 8,394,734.00 19,054.42 2,792,176.32 0% 10,192,356.06 550 DIF 7,032.71 21.42 1,165.65 0% - 0% 8,198.36
552 BASIC SERVICES DIF 1,193,509.06 222,523.00 20,966.17 171,338.29 77% 34,356.00 - 908.69 0% 1,363,938.66 554 GENERAL PLAN DIF 262,150.44 22,475.00 2,308.72 21,279.25 95% - 0% 283,429.69 555 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES DIF 2,959,965.64 349,589.00 55,388.98 333,665.18 95% 900,000.00 - 0% 3,293,630.82 556 TRAFFIC IMPACT DIF 1,252,418.95 135,510.00 3,795.31 103,707.74 77% 1,255,712.00 33,780.19 115,735.46 0% 1,240,391.23 557 PARKLAND DIF 5,523.20 24,908.94 0%
558 RAILROAD CROSSING DIF 2,431,181.44 164,743.00 30,907.82 182,550.48 111% 126,387.00 - 126,287.33 0% 2,487,444.59 559 POLICE FACILITIES DIF 2,087,989.95 253,688.00 38,005.06 238,853.72 94% 780,447.00 8,758.36 190,443.18 0% 2,136,400.49 560 FIRE STATION DIF 1,701,881.57 301,752.00 28,733.08 115,900.34 38% 914,321.00 - 68,548.33 0% 1,749,233.58 562 ROAD AND BRIDGE DIF 15,420,454.39 1,192,000.00 152,002.52 1,230,274.80 103% 11,566,029.00 251,124.74 1,573,698.41 0% 15,077,030.78 565 TRAILS DEVELOPMENT DIF 1,480.40 2,259.18 0% - - - 0% 2,259.18 566 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS DIF 1,129,129.20 301,712.00 4,837.52 187,785.45 62% - - 0% 1,316,914.65 567 COMMUNITY PARK DIF 3,493,326.22 1,090,088.00 13,485.56 161,509.71 15% 4,318,218.00 787,369.30 1,057,263.61 0% 2,597,572.32 568 REGIONAL PARK DIF 1,894,922.68 1,413.00 5,638.75 63,059.67 0% 1,842,925.00 57,163.24 101,077.99 0% 1,856,904.36 569 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK DIF 4,396,488.78 1,337,895.00 17,857.60 204,782.67 15% 1,349,000.00 0% 4,601,271.45 570 PASS THROUGH DIF 5,570,397.73 0% 6,362,815.00 98,638.65 359,212.10 0% 5,211,185.63 850 Beaumont Financing Authority 34,409,674.12 3,079,842.00 1,435,460.91 47% 3,079,842.00 3,079,841.79 0% 32,765,293.24 855 Beaumont Public Improvement Authorit 36,629,322.63 3,153,743.00 890,397.62 28% 3,153,743.00 3,005,832.38 0% 34,513,887.87 TOTALS 159,943,931.68 232,976,134.00 12,569,014.21 83,714,503.96 36% 328,645,289.62 6,216,636.25 81,818,102.30 25% 168,260,310.67

Page 1690 of 1702 ends

FY 2025
Beginning Fund Estimated April Activity
Balance (unaudited) Revenues

PROPRIETARY/ENTERPRISE FUNDS
FYTD 2025 Actual
Revenues
FY 2025 FYTD 2025
% Budgeted April Activity Actual % T/D Ending Fund
Expenditures Expenditures Balance
840 Community Facilities District (21Q016,093.23) 20,753,937.00 6,731,314.30 29,580,375.06 143% 20,144,790.00 97,055.00 38,982,329.57 0% (219,418,047.74) 860 Evidence 21,849.78 - 97.46 7,292.73 - - 29,142.51
TOTALS (209,994,243.45) 20,753,937.00 6,731,411.76 29,587,667.79 143% 20,144,790.00 97,055.00 38,982,329.57 194% (219,388,905.23)

Page 1691 of 1702 ends

PROPRIETARY/ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Beginning Fund
Balance
(unaudited)
FY 2025
Estimated April Activity
Revenues
FYTD 2025 Actual
Revenues
FY 2025 FYTD 2025
Budgeted April Activity Actual % T/D Ending Fund
Expenditures Expenditures Balance
564 RECYCLED WATER DIF 4,752,948.08 332,463.00 35,834.18 355,155.41 107% 1,943,687.00 74,694.81 272,710.77 0% 4,835,392.72 600 INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 9,719,886.39 1,578,920.00 20,776.77 1,405,469.66 89% 4,169,193.00 123,933.06 890,967.12 21% 10,234,388.93 700 WASTEWATER 7,598,525.02 14,830,049.00 155,164.01 11,504,033.97 78% 14,891,189.00 795,234.61 11,590,109.56 78% 7,512,449.43 705 WASTEWATER DIF 10,315,901.62 2,041,765.00 259,472.65 1,978,430.27 97% 8,162,910.00 38,484.00 666,342.20 8% 11,627,989.69 710 WASTEWATER CAPITAL PRO 102,999,422.07 15,630,847.00 1,091,357.06 6,945,003.51 44% 18,163,627.00 185,771.96 7,139,433.58 39% 102,804,992.00 750 TRANSIT (75,904.84) 3,278,071.00 235,134.83 2,775,862.58 85% 3,278,071.00 117,796.41 2,334,188.22 71% 365,769.52 755 Transit GASB 68 Fund 414,398.61 - - 0% - - - 0% 414,398.61 760 TRANSIT CAPITAL PROJECTS 4,997,496.25 21,754,638.00 - 5,693,360.98 26% 21,754,638.00 - 5,693,360.98 26% 4,997,496.25 TOTALS 140,722,673.20 59,446,753.00 1,797,739.50 30,657,316.38 52% 72,363,315.00 1,335,914.85 28,587,112.43 40% 142,792,877.15

Page 1692 of 1702 ends

BEAUMONT
-CALIFORNIA
April 15, 2025
League of California Cities (CalCities)
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
Subject: Opposition to Proposed Sales Tax Sharing Changes — Protecting Beaumont's Financial Stability
Dear CalCities Board Members,
On behalf of the City of Beaumont, I write to express our strong opposition to the Sales Tax Working Group's proposed recommendations to alter the allocation of the Bradley -Burns 1% Sales Tax for e -commerce transactions.

The proposed 50/50 revenue split between the point -of -sale and destination cities would have a significantly detrimental impact on Beaumont's fiscal stability. Our city has strategically invested in becoming a regional logistics hub, attracting distribution and fulfillment centers through responsible long-term planning. These decisions were made with a clear understanding that the resulting point -of -sale tax revenues would offset the considerable infrastructure burdens associated with this type of development.

The City of Beaumont is liable for the infrastructure that supports e -commerce operations —this includes roads, bridges, interchanges, traffic signals, high truck volumes, and commercial traffic.

The maintenance costs, unlike the proposed 50/50 revenue split, would not be shifted to the "destination" cities. To shift tax revenue away from the point of sales while ignoring all maintenance costs is not only inequitable but fundamentally flawed. We planned responsibly for the growth based on the current tax framework, and we are now being asked to absorb the costs without the revenue stream we were promised.

Based on FY2024 actuals, we estimate a loss of approximately $9.4 million annually should the 50/50 split be adopted. This would represent a significant blow to our ability to fund public safety, street repair, economic development, and core city services. The phased implementation period, while appreciated, does not negate the long-term structural deficit this proposal would impose on cities like Beaumont.

City of Beaumont 1550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, CA 92223 I (951) 769-8520 I BeaumontCA.gov

Page 1693 of 1702 ends

BEAUMONT
-CALIFORNIA-
Furthermore, this change retroactively undermines the very incentive structure that encouraged cities to invest in job creation, infrastructure, and commerce. If these recommendations proceed, cities that acted responsibly and fostered economic growth will be punished for their foresight.

This creates a chilling effect for future investment planning and sends a message that cities cannot rely on existing revenue frameworks when making long-term commitments to the community.

We strongly urge CalCities to reject this redistribution proposal and instead pursue policies that recognize the full financial responsibilities borne by point -of -sale cities. Any framework that ignores the cost of infrastructure maintenance while shifting revenue away is inherently inequitable and unsustainable.

We appreciate your ongoing advocacy and welcome the opportunity to work collaboratively on alternative solutions that uphold fiscal fairness and protect cities that have invested in California's economic engine.

Sincerely,
Mi
Mayor, ity of Beaumont
Cc:

City of Carson City of Manteca City of Richmond City of Victorville City of Chino City of Moreno City of Riverside City of Visalia City of Corona Valley City of San County of San
City of Eastvale City of Ontario Bernardino Bernardino
City of Fontana City of Oxnard City of San Diego County of City of Fresno City of Patterson City of Shafter Riverside City of Hayward City of Perris City of Stockton
City of Irvine City of Rancho City of Tracy
City of Jurupa Cucamonga City of Turlock
Valley City of Redlands City of Vacaville
City of Lathrop City of Rialto
City of Beaumont 1550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, CA 92223 I (951) 769-8520 I BeaumontCA.gov

Page 1694 of 1702 ends

May 22, 2025
Mayor Mike Lara
City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
Dear Mayor Lara,
Thank you for your letter regarding the Cal Cities City Managers Department Sales Tax Working Group's proposed recommendations to change the allocation of the Bradley - Burns 1% Sales Tax on e -commerce transactions. I sincerely appreciate your feedback and perspective, which is crucial for our member -driven organization and our advocacy on behalf of California cities.

The City Managers Department convened this diverse and representative group of city managers to examine local government sales tax issues and provide recommendations that equitably benefit cities across the state, further fiscal sustainability, and strengthen the viability of the sales tax.

The Working Group formed a consensus around a proposal to prospectively split the Bradley Burns sales and use tax from e -commerce transactions equitably between origin/fulfillment and destination cities, with each city receiving 50 percent of the revenues. Additionally, the proposal calls for a five-year phase -in approach and for use tax dollars in the county pools generated from out-of-state fulfillment to be allocated directly to the destination city. The proposal would not affect existing sales tax rebate agreements.

While the Working Group has completed its work, the proposed recommendations have not been adopted as the organization's official policy through our standing policy development process, which involves careful review and consideration by a policy committee and the Cal Cities Board. The Cal Cities Revenue and Taxation Policy Committee may consider the proposal at a future meeting and make a recommendation to the Cal Cities Board of Directors for final action. As part of any future consideration of the proposed recommendations, your letter will be included in the package of background materials for the Committee's and the Board's review.

To raise awareness about the proposal and gather input from peers, the City Managers Department is scheduling briefings with Regional Area Manager groups throughout the state. I have shared your letter with Department leadership to help inform those efforts.

I encourage the City of Beaumont to continue to engage in the process should the proposal move forward and have asked Cal Cities Senior Director of Public Affairs Kristine Guerrero to keep you apprised of the status of the proposal, including the timing 1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 91 6.658.8200 • calcities.org

41/41t40,

LEAGUE OF

CALIFORNIA
CITIES
of any consideration by the Revenue and Taxation Policy Committee or the Cal Cities Board.

Please feel free to contact Kristine or me if you have additional questions. Kristine can be reached directly at (626) 716-0076 or [email protected] Sincerely,
Car ly M. Coleman
Executive Director and CEO
League of California Cities
Cc:

City of Carson
City of Chino
City of Corona
Cit of Eastvale
Cit of Fontana
City of Fresno
City of Hayward
City of Irvine
City of Jurupa Valley
City of Lathrop
City of Manteca
City of Moreno Valley
City of Ontario
City of Oxnard
City of Patterson
City of Perris
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
City of Redlands
City of Rialto
City of Richmond
City of Riverside
City of San
Bernardino
City of San Diego
City of Shafter
City of Stockton
City of Tracy
City of Turlock
City of Vacaville
City of Victorville
City of Visalia
County of San
Bernardino
County of
Riverside
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento. CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org

Page 1696 of 1702 ends

CITY OF PERRIS

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
MICF AEL M. VARGAS
May 21, 2025
League of California Cities (CalCities)
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
Subject: Opposition to Proposed to E -Commerce Sales Tax Changes (Bradley Burns Sales Tax Reform) - Protecting Perris' Financial Stability
Dear CalCities Board Members,
On behalf of the City of Perris, I write to express our strong opposition to the Sales Tax Working Group's proposed recommendations to alter the allocation of the Bradley -Bums 1% Sales Tax for e -commerce transactions.

The proposed 50/50 revenue split between the point -of -sale and destination cities would have a significantly detrimental impact on Perris' fiscal stability. The City of Perris has spent years struggling to provide services to our residents due to the land use constraints that we have been faced with, through no fault of ours. We do not have the ability of developing large brick and mortar retail centers due to development intensity restrictions being located next to a military base. Our city has strategically invested in fulfillment centers through responsible long-term planning. These decisions were made with a clear understanding that the resulting point -of -sale tax revenues would offset the considerable infrastructure burdens associated with this type of development.

The City Manager's Sales Tax Group's recommendation came about during a time when e -commerce was thriving, which is no longer the case now. Due to the current volatile economic situation and tariffs, we are experiencing a decrease in e -commerce sales tax revenues to the point where one of our large fulfillment facilities has left the city. Based on FY2024 actuals, we estimate a loss of up to $3 million per year should the 50/50 split be adopted. Additionally, the City Manager's Sales Tax Group recommendation proposes a plus or minus of 10% to allow for flexibility that could apply to either the destination or host city. This is a large percentage of uncertainty as to where the additional plus or minus 10% could be allocated, thereby possibly causing up to a 60% loss of e -commerce sales tax revenue to host cities like us. This is a significant blow to our ability to fund public safety, street repair, economic development, and core city services. The phased implementation period, while appreciated, does not negate the long-term structural deficit this proposal would impose on cities like Perris. 101 North "D" Street
Perris, California 92570
(951) 943-6100 Ext. 231

Page 1697 of 1702 ends

We are liable for the infrastructure that supports e -commerce operations, which includes roads, bridges, interchanges, traffic signals, high truck volumes, and commercial traffic. The maintenance costs, unlike the proposed 50/50 revenue split, would not be shifted to the "destination" cities. To shift tax revenue away from the point of sales while ignoring all maintenance costs is not only inequitable but fundamentally flawed. We planned responsibly for the growth based on the current tax framework, and we are now being asked to absorb the costs without the revenue stream we planned.

Furthermore, this change retroactively undermines the very incentive structure that encouraged cities to invest in job creation, infrastructure, and commerce. If these recommendations proceed, cities that acted responsibly and fostered economic growth will be punished for their foresight. This creates a chilling effect for future investment planning and sends a message that cities cannot rely on existing revenue frameworks when making long-term commitments to the community.

Michael M. Vargas
Mayor, City of Perris
Cc:

City of Carson
City of Chino
City of Corona
City of Eastvale
City of Fontana
City of Fresno
City of Hayward
City of lrvine
City of Jurupa Valley
City of Cupertino
City of Manteca
City of Moreno Valley
City of Lathrop
City of Ontario
City of Oxnard
City of Patterson
City of Beaumont
City of Tracy
City of Redlands
City of Baldwin Park
City of Rialto
City of Richmond
City of Riverside
City of San Bernardino
City of San Diego
City of Shafter
City of Stockton
City of San Jacinto
City of Turlock
101 North "D" Street
Perris, California 92570
(951) 943-6100 Ext. 231
City of Vacaville
City of Victorville
City of Visalia
County of San Bernardino
County of Riverside
City of Ontario
City of Cupertino

Page 1698 of 1702 ends

C I TY OF
303 EAST B STREET I ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA 91764
PAUL S. LEON
MAYOR
ALAN D. WAPNER

MAYOR PRO TEM
JIM W. BOWMAN

DEBRA PORADA

DAISY MACIAS

COUNCIL MEMBERS
CalCities
Revenue and Taxation Committee
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
May 21, 2025

ONTARIO
(909( 395-2000 FAX (909) 395-2070 OntarioCA.gov

SHEILA MAUTZ

CITY CLERK
JAMES R. MILHISER

CITY TREASURER

SCOTT OCHOA

CITY MANAGER
Subject: Opposition to E -Commerce Sales Tax Changes (Bradley Burns Sales Tax Reform)
Dear CalCities Committee Members,
On behalf of the Ontario City Council, I write to express our continued opposition to altering the allocation of the Bradley -Bums 1% Sales Tax for e -commerce transactions. The rules that exist today related to sales tax revenues are part of a larger policy discussion regarding local government funding and have evolved over decades. Indeed, sales tax rules and guidelines are a direct reflection of how we treat property taxes in this state under Prop 13, as well as the larger local government funding regimen (Props 218 and 26, especially). Any endeavor to change sales tax rules in a vacuum, when cities have customized their respective revenue streams pursuant to the existing rules, will create a distortion that is neither fair nor practical.

Any retroactive change would undermine the very incentive structure that encouraged cities to invest in job creation, infrastructure, and commerce.

The City of Ontario currently feels the impact of traffic congestion, noise, truck storage, road wear and -tear, land use compatibility, and traffic safety/enforcement. Coupled with the impacts related to our airport's cargo operations, and two national freight lines, the price our community pays for the benefit of the greater region is indeed profound. Thousands of trucks traverse through our City each day as they support the national goods movement system. Recognizing

Page 1699 of 1702 ends

Ontario's role as a premier global gateway, we strive to provide a balanced quality of life for our residents. We support the continued education efforts of CalCities staff and stakeholders and believe this process should be allowed to be completed before any policy considerations are then discussed or considered for adoption. We welcome the opportunity to continue to work collaboratively on alternative solutions that uphold fiscal fairness and protect cities that have invested in California's economic engine.

Sincerely,
Scott Ochoa
City Manager
cc: CalCities Board
Ontario Legislative Delegation

Page 1700 of 1702 ends

CITYOF EASTVALE
12363 Limonite Avenue I Suite 9101 Eastvale, CA 91752
951.36L0900
May 28, 2025
League of California Cities (CalCities)
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
Subject: Opposition to Proposed E -Commerce Sales Tax Changes (Bradley Burns Sales Tax Reform)
Dear CalCities Board Members,
On behalf of the City of Eastvale, we write to express our strong opposition to the Sales Tax Working Group's proposed recommendations to alter the allocation of the Bradley -Burns 1% Sales Tax for e -commerce transactions.

The proposed 50/50 revenue split between the point -of -sale and destination cities would have a significantly detrimental impact on Eastvale's fiscal sustainability. Eastvale incorporated in 2010 and by 2011 lost a significant revenue stream when the state redistributed Vehicle License Fee revenue to special state law enforcement, which the city was not eligible for. Additionally, Eastvale has faced considerable land use constraints and limited commercial space. As a result, Eastvale made significant strategic investments in logistics and e -commerce infrastructure, which has allowed us to diversify our revenue base and fund essential city services.

Eastvale does not have the same volume of traditional retail as other cities due to its master - planned residential nature and limited commercial footprint. We have leaned into long-term economic development planning, including attracting major fulfillment and distribution centers that now serve as vital revenue generators. These developments were pursued with the understanding that point -of -sale tax revenues would help us meet the growing demands of a city that has doubled in population since incorporation in 2010.

Eastvale has taken on the infrastructure burdens and public safety costs that come with hosting high -volume e -commerce facilities that are not shared by destination cities. To now divert existing revenue away from cities that carry these burdens, without a corresponding shift in maintenance responsibility is inequitable and unsustainable.

The City Manager's Sales Tax Group's recommendations come at a time when e -commerce growth is plateauing and we are already seeing signs of volatility and decline in this sector. A revenue -sharing formula that removes significant revenue from point -of -sale cities like Eastvale eastvaleca.gov

Page 1701 of 1702 ends

threatens our ability to provide core services such as public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and community development. Based on fiscal year 2025 actuals, staff estimates the proposed shift would result in the loss of tens of millions in annual revenues. We rely on these revenues to provide vital services to the community, but to also maintain our roads, manage high truck traffic volumes, and provide adequate traffic control infrastructure necessitated by fulfillment operations. Calculating the precise impact is difficult because access to e -commerce purchase data specific to Eastvale is unavailable, which makes projecting the quality of Eastvale's fiscal health difficult. However, the City would be unable to maintain a structurally balanced budget with any loss of e -commerce revenue.

The proposal's allowance for an additional plus or minus 10% adjustment adds uncertainty and increases the potential for up to a 60% revenue loss. This degree of fiscal unpredictability is untenable for responsible, forward -planning cities like Eastvale, especially as we continue to build a stable foundation for future residents and businesses.

From incorporation in 2010, Eastvale has provided services from a small storefront located in a shopping center. In addition, our public library is located in a shared high school campus library, where hours of operation are limited by the school district. The nearest sheriff substation is located in a neighboring city over a half hour drive from the city. This lack of appropriate resources severely impacts our ability to serve our residents and businesses effectively. The city committed substantial resources towards construction of a Civic Center, which will include a City Hall, Library, and Police Station. Any reduction to e -commerce revenue will limit the city's ability to finance the project and provide vital services to the community.

All cities in California created revenue structures that were specific to local service needs required by the community. Cities that responsibly built and fostered economic growth should not be targeted for their foresight. We respectfully urge CalCities to reject the current redistribution proposal and instead advocate for solutions that equitably reflect the costs borne by point -of -sale cities. A sustainable and fair framework must account for the infrastructure obligations and economic investments that support California's e -commerce economy.

Sincerely,
7///,16/e(fi-n
Mike McMinn
Mayor
Salex Tax -Ad Hoc Committee Member
Jocelyn Yow
Mayor Pro Tem
Salex Tax -Ad Hoc Committee Member
eastvakeca.gav

Page 1702 of 1702 ends

Beaumont City CouncilJune 3, 2025

Beaumont City Council
June 3, 2025