Agenda packet — Beaumont City Council, September 2, 2025 (part 9 of 14)

DOC #2021-0431271 Page 10 of 20
Section 24. Indemnification
Developer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, city council, commissions, boards, subcommittees and City's elected and appointed officials, commissioners, board members, officers, agents, consultants and employees ("City Parties") from and against any and all liabilities, demands, claims, actions or proceedings and costs and expenses incidental thereto (including costs of defense, settlement and reasonable attorneys' fees), which any or all of them may suffer, incur, be responsible for or pay out as a result of or in connection with any challenge to the legality, validity or adequacy of any of the following items: (i) this Agreement and the concurrent and subsequent permits, licenses and entitlements approved by City; (ii) any environmental determination made by City in connection with the Project, Project Site or this Agreement; and (iii) any proceedings or other actions undertaken by City in connection with the adoption or approval of any of the above. In the event of any administrative, legal, equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including without limitation a governmental entity or official) challenging the legality, validity or adequacy of any of the above items or any portion thereof, the Parties shall mutually cooperate with each other in defense of said action or proceeding. Notwithstanding the above, City, at its sole option, may tender the complete defense of any third -party challenge as described herein. In the event City elects to contract with special counsel to provide for such a defense, City shall meet and confer with Developer regarding the selection of counsel, and Developer shall pay all costs related to retention of such counsel by City. Developer shall have no obligations under this Section 24 (except in relation to matters which occurred prior to the date of such transfer) with respect to any portion or all of the Subject Property after it has transferred and conveyed its fee interest in such portion or all of the Subject Property to a third party.

Section 25. Delays in Performance
In addition to any other provisions of this Agreement with respect to delay, Developer and City shall be excused for performance of their obligations hereunder during any period of delay caused by acts of God or civil commotion; major acts of terrorism occurring in the United States of America, riots, strikes, picketing, or other labor disputes; shortage of materials or supplies; damage to or prevention of work in process by reason of fire, floods, earthquake, or other casualties; litigation, restrictions imposed or mandated by governmental or quasi -governmental entities; and/or enactment of conflicting provisions of the Constitution, laws of the United States of America, the State of California, or any codes, statutes, regulations or executive mandates promulgated thereunder. If written notice of such delay is given to either party within thirty (30) days after the commencement of such delay, an extension of time for such cause shall be granted in writing for the period of the delay, or longer as may be mutually agreed upon.

Section 26. Events of Default
A default under this Agreement shall be deemed to have occurred upon the happening of one or more of the following events or conditions: (i) a warranty, representation, or statement made or furnished by Developer expressly in this Agreement 10

Page 1116 of 1893 ends

DOC #2021-0431271 Page 11 of 20
to City or by City to Developer is false or proves to have been false in any material respect when it was made, or (ii) a finding by City made following a periodic review of the Agreement under the procedure provided in this Agreement, based on substantial evidence, that Developer has not complied in good faith with one or more of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, or (iii) Developer's failure to perform any of its material obligations under this Agreement (each an "Event of Default"). Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default by Developer or City, the non -defaulting party shall provide the other party thirty (30) calendar days written notice specifying the nature of the alleged default and the manner in which said default may be satisfactorily cured ("Notice of Default").

Subject to any extensions of time by mutual consent of the parties in writing, and subject to the provisions of Sections 25 and 31 of this Agreement, the failure or unreasonable delay by either party to perform any material term or provision of this Agreement for a period of thirty (30) days after the receipt of a written notice of default from the other party shall constitute a default under this Agreement. If the nature of the alleged default is such that it cannot reasonably be cured within such thirty (30) calendar day period, the commencement of the cure within such time period and the diligent prosecution to completion of the cure shall be deemed a cure within such period. Any Notice of Default given hereunder shall specify in detail the nature of the alleged Event of Default and the manner in which such Event of Default may be satisfactorily cured in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. During the time periods herein specified for cure of an Event of Default, the party charged therewith shall not be considered to be in default for purposes of termination of this Agreement, institution of legal proceedings with respect thereto, or whether any further building permits shall be issued with respect to the Project Site.

Section 27. No Ministerial Permits upon Developer Default No ministerial permits, such as but not limited to building permits and grading permits, shall be issued nor shall any applications for such ministerial permits be accepted for any structure or improvement for the Project or on the Project Site during the course of any default proceedings initiated by City until after it has been determined Developer is not in default or until such default is cured by Developer or is waived by City.

Section 28. Applicable Law
This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

Section 29. Venue
In the event that suit is brought by either party to this Agreement, the parties agree that venue shall be exclusively vested in the State courts of the County of Riverside, California or where appropriate, in the United States District Court, Southern District of California, Riverside, California.
11

Page 1117 of 1893 ends

DOC #2021-0431271 Page 12 of 20
Section 30. No Damages Relief
Notwithstanding anything else in this Agreement to the contrary, the parties acknowledge that neither would have entered into this Agreement had either been exposed to damage claims for any breach hereof. As such, the parties agree that in no event shall either party be entitled to recover monetary damages of any kind whatsoever (other than the recovery of costs and attorney's fees pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or applicable law) against the other for breach of this Agreement.

Section 31. Legal Action; Attorneys' Fees
Either party may, in addition to any other rights or remedies, institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy a default, enforce any covenant or agreement herein, enjoin any threatened or attempted violation hereof, or enforce by specific performance the obligations and rights of the parties hereto. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to be paid by the losing party.

Section 32. Notices
Any notice or communication required hereunder among City and Developer shall be in writing, and may be given either personally or by registered mail, return -receipt requested.

Notice, by personal delivery, shall be deemed to have been given and received on the actual receipt by any of the addressees designated below as the party to whom notices are to be sent.

Notice by registered mail shall be deemed to have been received when delivered by the US Mail service to the recipient. Any party hereto may at any time, upon written notice to the other party hereto, designate any other address in substitution of the address to which such notice or communication shall be given. Such notices or communications shall be given to the parties at their addresses set forth below:

To City:

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
Attention: Community Development Director
To Developer:

USEF Crossroads I & II, LLC
USAA Real Estate Company
9830 Colonnade Blvd., Suite 600
San Antonio, TX 78230
Attn: Lange Allen
E-mail: l ue.a en' cam
12

Page 1118 of 1893 ends

DOC #2021-0431271 Page 13 of 20
Section 33. Consistency of Entitlements withAgreement
The parties hereto acknowledge that it is their intention that all terms, conditions and obligations of any and all entitlements related to the Project Site and/or Project, or arising from this Agreement shall be consistent with, or at minimum, shall not conflict with, the terms, provisions and obligations of this Agreement.

Section 34. Partial Invalidity Due to Governmental Action In the event state or federal laws or regulations enacted after the Effective Date, or formal action of any governmental entity other than City, prevent compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement, or require changes in plans, maps or permits approved by City, the parties agree that the provisions of this Agreement shall be modified, extended or suspended only to the minimum extent necessary to comply with such laws or regulations.

Section 35. Further Actions andInstruments
The parties agree to provide reasonable assistance to the other and cooperate to carry out the intent and fulfill the provisions of this Agreement. Each of the parties shall promptly execute and deliver all documents and perform all acts as necessary to carry out the matters contemplated by this Agreement.

Section 36. Entire Agreement
This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto contain all the representations and the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Except as otherwise specified in this Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto, any prior correspondence, memoranda, warranties, representations and agreements unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, are superseded in total by this Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto.

Section 37. Severability
If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is repealed by referendum or is held by a court of competent jurisdiction or an authorized government enforcement agency to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions, if any, of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, unless enforcement of this Agreement as so invalidated would be unreasonable or grossly inequitable under all the circumstances or would frustrate the purposes of this Agreement.

Section 38. Authority to Execute Agreement
13

Page 1119 of 1893 ends

DOC #2021-0431271 Page 14 of 20
The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Developer and City warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this Agreement and the authority to bind Developer and City, as applicable, to the performance of their respective obligations hereunder.

Section 39. Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in duplicate counterpart originals, each of which is deemed to be an original, and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

Section 40. Recordation
In order to comply with Section 65868.5 of the Development Agreement Statute, the parties do hereby direct the City Clerk to cause a copy of this Agreement to be recorded with the Riverside County Recorder's Office within ten (10) days after the Enacting Ordinance takes effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the dates written above.
14

Page 1120 of 1893 ends

DOC #2021-0431271 Page 15 of 20
USEF CROSSROADS I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company BY: USAA EAGLE REAL ESTATE MULTI -SECTOR
OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, its managing member
By: USAA Ea OP GP, LLC,
a Delaw imited liabili
y, its general partner
Title: Executive managing Direclur
Date Signed:

STATE OF TEXAS

COUNTY OF BEXAR
Personally appeared before me,
1 , Notary Public,
, wit "" whom I am per _ ally acquainted, and who
acknowledged that he executed the within instrument for the purposes therein contained, and who further acknowledged that he is th f USAA Eagle OP GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, general partner of U agle Real Estate Multi -Sector Operating Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, managing member of USEF CROSSROADS I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and is authorized to execute this instrument.

WITNESS my hand, at office, this day of , 2021.

MARY ANN SANTIAGO
Notary Public, State of Teas
My Comm. x.11.04-2024
ID No.13276396-3
t
Notary 'Ptr i lic
My Commission Expires: as
16 065611.00522 363652 vl

Page 1121 of 1893 ends

DOC #2021-0431271 Page 16 of 20

USEF CROSSROADS II, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: USAA Eagle Real Estate Multi -Sector Operating Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, its managing member
By:

Name:

Title:

Date Signed:
any, its general partner

STATE OF TEXAS

COUNTY OF BEXAR
Bruce C. Petersen
Executive Managing Director
Personally appeared before me,
p y acquainted, and who
acknowledged that he executed the within instrument for the purposes therein contained, and who further acknowledged that he is the C F,°` SAA Eagle OP GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, general partner of US • - _le Real Estate Multi -Sector Operating Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, managing member of USEF CROSSROADS II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and is authorized to execute this instrument. 1` 4 `,1I�. f , Notary Public,
wi whom I am erso ll
WITNESS my hand, at office, this day of

MARY ANN SANTIAGO
Notary Public, State of Texas
My Comm. Exp. 11-04-2024
ID No. 13276396-3
17 , 2021.

Notate blic
My Commission Expires:
065611.00522 363652 vl

Page 1122 of 1893 ends

DOC #2021-0431271 Page 17 of 20
Exhibit "A"
Tract 1:

PARCEL "B" AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" TO LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 16-LLA- 002, RECORDED MAY 31, 2016, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2016-0221815 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

A PORTION OF PARCEL 2, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 34209, IN THE CITY OF

BEAUMONT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 233, PAGES 81 THROUGH 85 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LYING WITHIN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN

BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 229.97 FEET EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 02° 23' 07" WEST, 1065.16 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PROSPERITY WAY (78.00 FEET WIDE), AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 34209;
THENCE ALONG LAST SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH 87° 36' 53" EAST, 1297.61 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE IN LAST SAID

NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS 489.00 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07° 13' 38" AN ARC LENGTH OF 61.68 FEET;

THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE ALONG LAST SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, NORTH 85° 09' 29" EAST, 272.23 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2;
THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2, NORTH 00° 29' 47" WEST, 1004.85 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT THEREIN;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH 86° 46' 09" WEST,

15.00 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT THEREIN;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH 00° 29' 47" WEST,

23.26 FEET TO SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2, NORTH 87° 36' 53" WEST, 1562.51 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

Tract 2:

PARCEL "A" OF NOTICE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 16-LLA-002, AS EVIDENCED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED MAY 31, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2016- 0221815 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1 AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 2, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 34209,

IN THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS 18 065611.00522 363652 vl

Page 1123 of 1893 ends

DOC #2021-0431271 Page 18 of 20
PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 233, PAGES 81 THROUGH 85 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL

MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LYING WITHIN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 229.97 FEET EASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 02° 23' 07" WEST, 1065.16 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PROSPERITY WAY (78.00 FEET WIDE), AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 34209; THENCE ALONG LAST SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, NORTH 87° 36' 53" WEST, 871.62 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE IN LAST

SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS 100.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17° 12' 31" AN ARC LENGTH OF 30.03 FEET; THENCE

TANGENT TO SAID CURVE ALONG LAST SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, NORTH 70° 24' 22" WEST, 50.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 61.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 67° 27' 57" AN ARC LENGTH OF 71.83 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT "G" AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 34209; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT "G", NORTH 87° 36' 53" WEST, 100.62 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "I" AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 34209; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "I", NORTH 01° 23' 48" WEST, 1002.52 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID NORTHERLY LINE ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF MORENO VALLEY FREEWAY, AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 34209; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1, SOUTH 88° 06' 53" EAST, 116.17 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1, SOUTH 79° 09' 57" EAST, 279.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE IN SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1, CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 425.00 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29° 30' 19" AN ARC LENGTH OF 218.86 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1, NORTH 71° 19' 44" EAST, 156.05

FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE IN SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 375.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21° 03' 23" AN ARC LENGTH OF 137.81 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2, SOUTH 87° 36' 53" EAST, 292.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2:

NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS FOR ROADWAYS, UTILITIES & OTHER PURPOSES AS CREATED BY THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED "DECLARATION OF

COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR CROSSROADS LOGISTIC CENTER AN INDUSTRIAL COMMON INTEREST DEVELOPMENT" RECORDED JUNE 14, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2016- 0243325 AND AMENDED BY THAT CERTAIN 19 065611.00522 363652 vl

Page 1124 of 1893 ends

DOC #2021-0431271 Page 19 of 20
"FIRST AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR CROSSROADS LOGISTIC CENTER" RECORDED OCTOBER 19, 2018 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2018- 0414545 BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL 3: NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR

EMERGENCY ACCES, INGRESS AND EGRESS, AS SET FORTH IN THAT CERTAIN "EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT GRANT AND AGREEMENT" RECORDED JUNE 15, 2016 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2016- 0244428 OF OFFICIAL RECOORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

Tract 3:

PARCEL A AS SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF PARCEL MERGER NO. 19-M-005, AS EVIDENCED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 07, 2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0401443 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 34209, IN THE CITY OF BEAUMONT,

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 233, PAGES 81 THROUGH 85 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH LOT "C" OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 34209 VACATED BY RESOLUTION NO. 2018-30 - NOTICE OF STREET VACATION NO. 18-SV-004 BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, RECORDED OCTOBER 19, 2018 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2018-0414547, OF

OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, ALL LYING WITHIN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN

BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4, SOUTH 87° 36' 53" EAST, 726.11 FEET TO THE WESTERLY CURVED LINE OF SAID LOT "C", BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 961.00

FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF NON -TANGENT CURVE BEARS SOUTH 85° 25' 24" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "C" THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES:
1) SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03° 00' 23", AN ARC LENGTH OF 50.43 FEET;
2) SOUTH 07° 34' 59" WEST, 81.37 FEET;
3) SOUTH 51° 04' 05" WEST, 23.55 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY CURVED LINE OF 4TH STREET (100.00 FEET WIDE) AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 34209, BEING

THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,150.00 FEET; A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF NON -TANGENT CURVE BEARS NORTH 04° 49' 54" EAST;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF 4TH STREET THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES:
20 065611.00522 363652 vl

Page 1125 of 1893 ends

DOC #2021-0431271 Page 20 of 20
1) EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16° 46' 49", AN ARC LENGTH OF 336.80 FEET;
2) SOUTH 68° 23' 17" EAST, 589.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,050.00 FEET; 3) EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20° 50' 09", AN ARC LENGTH OF 381.84 FEET;
4) SOUTH 89° 13' 26" EAST, 499.45 FEET;
5) NORTH 46° 19' 53" EAST, 26.61 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF DISTRIBUTION WAY (78.00 FEET WIDE) AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 32409;

THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF DISTRIBUTION WAY THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES:
1) NORTH 00° 29' 47" WEST, 625.48 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 639.00 FEET; 2) NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24° 02' 37", AN ARC LENGTH OF 268.15 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 561.00 FEET,

A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF TANGENT REVERSE CURVE BEARS SOUTH 66° 27' 10" EAST;
3) NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28° 23' 21", AN ARC LENGTH OF 277.97 FEET;
4) NORTH 04° 50' 31" WEST, 60.21 FEET;
5) NORTH 51° 02' 01" WEST, 27.46 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PROSPERITY WAY (78.00 FEET WIDE) AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 34209;

THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PROSPERITY WAY THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES:
1) SOUTH 85° 09' 29" WEST, 65.88 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 567.00 FEET; 2) WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07° 13' 38", AN ARC LENGTH OF 71.52 FEET;
3) NORTH 87° 36' 53" WEST, 2,169.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET; 4) WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17° 12' 31", AN ARC LENGTH OF 30.03 FEET;
5) SOUTH 75° 10' 35" WEST, 50.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 61.00 FEET; 6) WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 67° 27' 57", AN ARC LENGTH OF 71.83 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT "F" OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 34209, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 52° 38' 32" WEST;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT "F", NORTH 87° 36' 53" WEST,

95.47 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 4, SOUTH 01° 23' 48" EAST, 796.71 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
21 065611.00522 363652 vl

Page 1126 of 1893 ends

7Column

INTERIM AD DRAFT
This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run in The Press -Enterprise on the dates indicated below.

If changes are needed, please contact us prior to deadline at (951) 368-9229.

Notice ID: XypcgldV41Qse6Xwt942 I Proof Updated: Jan. 23, 2025 at 03:37pm PST Notice Name: Development Annual Reviews 2024
FILER
Katie Jenson
[email protected]
(951) 769-8520
Columns Wide: 4

FILING FOR
The Press -Enterprise
Ad Class: Legals
01/26/2025: City Notices 268.00
Subtotal $268.00
Tax % 0
Total $268.00
See Proof on Next Page
Development Annual Reviews 2024 - Page 1 of 2

Page 1127 of 1893 ends

LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City of Beaumont will conduct publlc hearings to consider the matter described below. The Planning Commission's public hearing will be held of S:0D p.m. on Wednesday February 12 th , 2025 at 550 East Sixth Street, Beaumont, California.

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ANNUAL REVEIWS, Per City o€
Beaumont Resolution 1987-34, the City of Beaumont Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing and review the status of the following development agreements active between a developer and the City of Beaumont:

Pardee Homes
SDC Fairway Canyon, LLC
LV Heartland LLC
Exeter Cherry Valley Land LLC
Mc Donald Property Group
USEF Crossroads LLC
Public comments can be made in person, using the public comment phone line or by written email. Phone -1n comments will be accepted by calling the designated public comment phone line (951) 922- 4845 prior to the corresponding item. Public comments shall not exceed three minutes unless otherwise authorized by City Council.

Written comments can be emaiied to [email protected] Public comments accepted via email will be read aloud during the corresponding Item of the meeting. Comments can be submitted any time prior to the meeting as wel I as during the meeting until the end of the corresponding item.

This meeting will be conducted in ,person and also and will be recorded for live streaming. Ad City of Beaumont public meetings will be made available via live streaming and made available on the City's official YouTube webpage. Please use the following link during the meeting for live stream access: BeaumontCcr.gov/Llvestream Katie Jenson
Assistant Planner
[email protected]
The Press -Enterprise
Published: 1/26/25
Development Annual Reviews 2024 - Page 2 of 2

Page 1128 of 1893 ends

Z
W
L
cu
a)
Q
N
W

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution.

Require Annual Council
DA Review.

Page 1130 of 1893 ends

s
•
• • • • • • .
• • • • • • • • • •
•
. • • • • • .
• • •
• • • • • • • •
. • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • •
•
. • • •
• • • • • •
• • •
• • • • • • • • . • •
• •
• • • • • • • • • •• • • •
. • •
• ••
•
•
•
• • • • • • • •
• • .
• •
•
•

BACKGROUND
• a •

Page 11 ends

Resolution No. 1987-34, adopted
May 11, 1987.

February 12, 2025 Planning
Commission vote.

February 18, 2025 City Council
directive.

Compartmentalized and focused on
DA research apart from CFD
discussion.
1 of 1893

II I _
CA
t‘;aYActive Development
Agreements
Heartland
/ Olivewood
Hidden
Canyon
Rolling

Page 1132 of 1893 ends

Beaumont
=;r,.;
Ude'. vii,..

Ea*
Sundance
,10

Active
Inactive
Corn let

CURRENT

AGREEMENTS
Tournament
Heartland
Olivewood
O Valey Par Nay
Canyon
Roam;
Map data w. OpenStreetMap contrib

4. y
:Mount Davrs
865 m
Beaumon
CA..
s, Microsoft, fa
Sundance
Eat eth street
•nogle, Esri Community r
,stributors, Map layer i
0 0.5 1
I t
2 Mile
i I

Page 1133 of 1893 ends

Created By: Bradley Barnhart
Date: Feb 6 2025

Active/In
Progress
Inactive
Complete
Homes
Left to
Build
Development 6
Agreements
2 1,079
TOTAL
• Nine (9) total.
• Six (6) in progress.
• Two (2) inactive.
• One (1) complete.
6 2
1 9
Effective Agreements

Recommended Changes
Required Annual DA Review
#ACITYELEVATED

CITY OF BEAUMONT
550 East 6th Street, Beaumont, CA 92223
951) 769-8520
BEAUMONTCA.GOV
004

Planning Commission Authority
• Annually.
• Public Hearing.
• Good faith compliance
demonstration,
determination, and
recommendation.

Page 1136 of 1893 ends

Next Steps
Rely
Rely upon work of advisory body.

Develop additional opportunities
for review and analysis.

Action item confirmation.

Page 1137 of 1893 ends

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution.

Require Annual Council
DA Review.

Page 1138 of 1893 ends

BEAUMONT
-C A L I F O R N A -
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Kari Mendoza, Administrative
DATE: September 2, 2025
SUBJECT: Authorize Changes to the Uniform Compensation Plan Description: The attached compensation plan has been updated to reflect all new classifications approved in the FY 2026 adopted budget, labor negotiated cost of living increases and recommended classification changes.

Background and Analysis:

On June 3, 2025, Council adopted the FY 25/26 budget with 279 full time equivalent employees. The new classifications authorized Administrative Assistant, Assistant Director of Community Services, Buyer, Communication Specialist, Customer Service Supervisor, Facility Maintenance Worker, GIS Intern, Public Works Manager, Purchasing Manager and Transit Supervisor. The new position salaries were studied through subscriptions with Neogov and Govinvest Live Compensation Module.

Negotiated cost of living increases and minimum wage adjustments are also reflected in the updated uniform compensation plan.

Staff and administration are consistently evaluating workloads, current positions, staffing levels and individual department organizational structures. The Police Department recently completed a comprehensive evaluation of the department's current staffing model and organizational structure. This analysis included a comparison to the recently conducted California POST Management Study Report on the Beaumont Police Department. The objective was to identify opportunities to better align job titles and divisional structures with their intended functions and purposes, ensuring the highest quality service delivery to the Beaumont community.

As a result of the evaluation, the department proposes transferring Dispatch to the Operations Division due to its critical and sensitive public safety functions that need 24/7 management coverage. As a result, the department recommends eliminating the classification of Police Services Manager and one Support Services Supervisor, replacing it with two Dispatch Supervisors. These classifications will add to the direct supervision of dispatch operations across all shifts, seven days a week. The Dispatch

Page 1140 of 1893 ends

Supervisors will report to the Lieutenants of the Operations Division, who already provide 24/7 management coverage, ensuring consistent leadership and accountability.

Lastly the department seeks to eliminate one Support Services Specialist and add one Property and Evidence Technician. Support Services Specialists primarily complete records management tasks. Currently, these employees complete temporary terms in the Property & Evidence Department on a rotational basis. Employees assigned to the property & evidence role must complete extensive training and continuous updates to ensure compliance with ever-changing legislation and regulations. Because of the comprehensive training and unique expertise in these positions, the California Peace Officers Standard and Training (POST) management study recommended "establishing a policy and practice of at least one permanent position in the Property & Evidence section of BPD. The goal of this recommendation is for the development of staff to the highest level of skills and experience afforded to an employee involved in this critical function." Current staff will be eligible to compete for these new classifications and or be placed in existing vacant positions they qualify for.

Fiscal Impact:

The elimination of one Police Services Manager and one Support Services Supervisor and the addition of two Dispatch Supervisors will provide a total savings of $61,007 in salary and benefits to the General Fund.

The elimination of one Support Services Specialist and the addition of one Property and Evidence Technician will have no impact on the general fund, as the salary schedule will remain the same.

The cost of living increases for executive staff were not captured during the annual budget process and will result in a fully burdened increase of $116,058 which can be absorbed by salary savings due to vacant positions.

Recommended Action:

Approve the attached Uniform Compensation Plan.

Approve the elimination of one Police Services Manager, PSM-01.

Approve the elimination of one Support Services Supervisor, SSSPV-01.

Approve the elimination of one Support Services Specialist, SSS-06.

Approve the addition of two Dispatch Supervisors, DS -01 and DS -02.

Approve the addition of one Property & Evidence Technician, PET -01.

Page 1141 of 1893 ends

Attachments:

A. City Uniform Compensation Plan — Redlined and Clean Version B. Police Department Organizational Chart

Page 1142 of 1893 ends

8 L ONT
- COMPENSATION PLAN -
Adopted by City Council January 21, 2025 TBD
Effective January 2 , 2025Juk 112025
M I U Assi:n • d T i
.

Sal ry
Range
Psition
Accountant
SEIU
5957
696
Account Technician I
SEIU
4846
5856
Account Technician II
SEIU
525#1
6260
Administrative Assistant I
SEIU
44 54
Administrative Assistant II
SEIU
48 58
Administrative Services Director
Employment Contract
9492
104102
Animal Control Officer I
SEIU
4846 _
5856
Animal Control Officer II
SEIU
5250
6268
Assistant Director of Community Services
Manager/Professional/Technical
78 88
Assistant Director of Finance
Manager/Professional/Technical
8585
9593
Assistant Engineer
SEIU
6269
7278
Assistant Planner
SEIU
5856
6866
Associate Engineer
SEIU
6664
7674
Associate Planner
SEIU
6462
7472
Budget Analyst
Manager/Professional/Technical
6462
7472
Building/Grounds/Maintenance
Su • ervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
6269
7278
Building/Grounds/Maintenance Worker
SEIU _
4249
5259
Building Inspector
SEIU
5654
6664
Building Permit Technician I
SEIU
4412
5452
Building Permit Technician II
SEIU
504g
6055
Buildin_ Plans Examiner
SEIU
6159
7169
Bus Driver
SEIU
3937
494-7
Buy er _
SEIU
54 64
Chief Buildin_ Official
Manager/Professional/Technical
8684
9694
_
Chief of Police
Employment Contract
10098
110�9g
Ci Engineer / Public Works Director
Em.lo ment Contract
9492
104102
Cit Manager
Em.lo ment Contract
102
112
Communications Specialist
SEIU
I 50
60 Community Development Director
Employment Contract
9492
104102
Communit Enhancement Officer I
SEIU
5045
6058
Community Enhancement Officer II
SEIU
5452
6462
Community Services Director
Employment Contract
8684
9694
Communi Services Officer
POA
5048
6058
Customer Service Coordinator I
SEIU
3654
4644
Customer Service Coordinator II
SEIU
4249
5258
Customer Service Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
59 69
Deputy City Manager
Employment Contract
9694
106" 0''
_
City Clerk
Manager/Professional/Technical
6866
7876
_Deputy
Director of Water Reclamation
Employment Contract
8786
9795
Dispatch Su pervisor
POA
62 72
Dated: January 21, 2025
tf:M9m 'ompen9f tlfMan

Page 1 of 2 ends

Economic Development Director
Employment Contract
9290
102--09
Economic Development Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
7674
8684
Engineering Development Technician I
SEIU
4846
585-6
Engineering Development Technician II
SEIU
5048
605-8
Environmental Compliance Program
Specialist
Manager/Professional/Technical
6563
7573
Executive Assistant
Manager/Professional/Technical
5755
6765
Facility Maintenance Worker
SEIU
42 52
Finance Director
Employment Contract
9492
1044-02
GIS Anal st
_
SEIU
5755
6765
Position
MU Assigned To
Salary
I• US1 I'/)
Range
TopStep
GIS Intern
36 46
Grants Analyst
SEIU
6260
7270
Grounds/Parks/Facilities Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
7674
8684
HR/Payroll Technician
SEIU
4846
5856
I-IR/Risk Analyst
Manager/Professional/Technical i
6260
7270
Information Technology Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
8583
9593
IT Analyst I _
SEIU
5553
6563
IT Analyst II _
SEIU
6361
7374 -
Lead Building/Grounds Maintenance Worker
SEIU _ _
4846
5856
Lead Bus Driver
SEIU
4543
5553
Lead Dispatcher _
POA
5452
6462
Lead Street Maintenance Worker
SEIU
5250
6260
Lead Support Services Specialist
Police Officers Association
4644
5654
Lifeguard
SEIU
292-7
3432
Mechanic
SEIU _
4846
5856
Management Analyst I
SEIU
5654
6664
Management Analyst II
SEIU
6260
7270
Payroll / Benefits Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
67655
7775
Planning Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
8280
9290
Police Cadet
31 31
Police Captain
Police Management
9593
1054-03
Police Corporal _
Police Officers Association
7472
8482
Police Lieutenant
Police Management
9088
1009-8,
Police Officer _
Police Officers Association
6866
7876
Police Sergeant
Police Officers Association
8078
9088
Police Services Mana er
Mana er/Professional/Technical
7573
8583
Police Trainee
49 49
Pool Manager
SEIU
3634
4139
Principal Engineer
Manager/Professional/Technical
7674
_
8684
Principal Management Analyst _
Manager/Professional/Technical
7270
8280
Procurement/Contract Specialist
SEIU
_
5957
6967
Project Manager (CIP)
Manager/Professional/Technical
737
8384
Property Evidence Technician
POA
42 52
Public Information Officer
Manager/Professional/Technical
7472
8482
Public Safety Dispatcher I
Police Officers Association
4644
5654
Public Safety Dispatcher II
Police Officers Association
5250
6260
Dated: January 21, 2025
® Q44/410 rtib89arn

Page 2 of 2 ends

Public Works Inspector
SEIU _
6159
716-9
Public Works Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
74 84
Purchasing Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
74 84
Records Technician
SEIU
4846
5856
Recreation Coordinator
SEIU
4846
5856
Recreation Specialist
SEIU
2926
3936
Recreation Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
7169
817-9
Senior Engineer
Manager/Professional/Technical
7674
I 8684
Senior Management Analyst
Manager/Professional/Technical
6765
7775
Senior Planner
Manager/Professional/Technical
7279
8289
Street Maintenance Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
6364-
7374
Street Maintenance Worker
SEIU
4846
5856
Support Services Specialist I
Police Officers Association
3634
4644
Su. .ort Services S pecialist II
Police Officers Association
4240
5259
Position
MOU Assigned To
Salary
Range
l op .Step
First Step
Support Services Supervisor
Police Officers Association
6269
7270
Transit Manager I
Manager/Professional/Technical
76 1-
8684
Transit Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
65 75
Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
676-5
7775
Wastewater Collections Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
6462
7472
Wastewater Collection System Worker I
SEIU
5048
606-8
Wastewater Collection System Worker II
SEIU
5452
6462
Wastewater Plant Operator I
SEIU
5553
6563 -
Wastewater Plant Operator II
SEIU
615-9
7169
Wastewater Plant Operator III
SEIU
6563
7574
Wastewater Plant Operator IV
SEIU
6967
797-7
Wastewater Plant Operator V
SEIU
73 8384 -
Wastewater Plant Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
6967
797-7
Water Safety Instructor
SEIU
2927
3432
Dated: January 21, 2025 L/niggik 3414§Alio n

Page 3 of 2 ends

Page 1146 of 1893 ends

BEAUMONT
- COMPENSATION PLAN -
Adopted by City Council TBD
Effective July 1, 2025
Position
MOU Assigned To
Salary
Range
kips! Step
Tots MI) -
Accountant
SEIU
59 69
Account Technician I
SEIU _
48 58
Account Technician II
SEIU
52 62
Administrative Assistant I
SEIU
44 54
Administrative Assistant II
SEIU
48 58
Administrative Services Director
Employment Contract
94 104
Animal Control Officer I
SEIU
48 58
Animal Control Officer II
SEIU
52 62
Assistant Director of Community Services
Manager/Professional/Technical
78 88
Assistant Director of Finance
Manager/Professional/Technical
85 95
Assistant Engneer
SEIU -
62 72
Assistant Planner
SEIU - _ _
58 68
Associate Engineer
SEIU
66 76
-
Associate Planner
SEIU
64 74
Bud et Analyst
Mana er/Professional/Technical
64 74
Manager/Professional/Technical
62 72
Building/Grounds/Maintenance
Supervisor
Building/Grounds/Maintenance Worker
SEIU
42 52
Building Inspector
SEIU
56 66
Building Permit Technician I
SEIU
44 54
Building Permit Technician II
SEIU
50 60
Building Plans Examiner
SEIU
61 71
Bus Driver
SEIU
39 49
Buyer
SEIU
54 64
Chief Building Official
Manager/Professional/Technical -
86 96
Chief of Police
Employment Contract
100
_ 110
City Engineer / Public Works Director
Employment Contract
94 104
City Manager
Employment Contract
102
112
Communications Specialist
SEIU
50 60
Community Development Director
Employment Contract
94 104
Community Enhancement Officer I
SEIU
50 60
Community Enhancement Officer II
SEIU
54 64
Community Services Director
Employment Contract
86 96
Community Services Officer
POA -
50 60
Customer Service Coordinator I
SEIU _
36 46
Customer Service Coordinator II
SEIU
42_
52 Customer Service Supervisor _
Manager/Professional/Technical
59 69
Deputy City Manager
Employment Contract
96 106
Deputy City Clerk
Manager/Professional/Technical
68 78
Director of Water Reclamation
Employment Contract
87 97
Dispatch Supervisor
POA
62 72
Dated: August 25, 2025
893
&ffar'm L ompenssatronn Plan
Page I of 2

Position
MOU Assigned To
Salary
Range
I irst.S7ep
7opSlep
Economic Develo3ment Director
Employment Contract
92 102
Economic Development Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
76 86
Engineering Development Technician I
SEIU
48 58
Engineering Development Technician II
SEIU
50 60
Environmental Compliance Program
Specialist
Manager/Professional/Technical
65 75
Executive Assistant
Manager/Professional/Technical
57 67
Facility Maintenance Worker
SEIU
42 52
Finance Director
Employment Contract
94 1042
GIS Analyst
SEIU
57 67
GIS Intern _ _
_ _
36 46
Grants Analyst
SEIU
62 72
Grounds/Parks/Facilities Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
76 86
HR/Payroll Technician
SEIU
48 58
HR/Risk Analyst
Manager/Professional/Technical
62 72
Information Technology Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical '
85 95
IT Analyst I
SEIU
55 65
IT Analyst II
SEIU
63 73
Lead Building/Grounds Maintenance Worker
SEIU _
48 58
Lead Bus Driver
SEIU I
45 55
Lead Dispatcher
POA
54 64
Lead Street Maintenance Worker
SEIU
52 62
Lead Support Services Specialist
Police Officers Association
46 56
Lifeguard
SEIU
29 34
Mechanic
SEIU
48 58
Management Analyst I
SEIU
56 66
Management Analyst II
SEIU
62 72
Payroll / Benefits Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
67 77
Planning Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
82 92
Police Cadet
_
31 31
Police Captain
Police Management
95 105
Police Corporal
Police Officers Association
74 84
Police Lieutenant
Police Management
90 100
Police Officer
Police Officers Association
68 78
Police Sergeant
Police Officers Association
80 90
Police Services Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
75 85
Police Trainee
49 49
Pool Manager
SEIU
36 41
Principal Engineer
Manager/Professional/Technical
76 86
Principal Management Analyst
Manager/Professional/Technical
72 82
Procurement/Contract Specialist
SEIU
59 69
Pro'ect Manager (CIP)
Manager/Professional/Technical
73 83
Property Evidence Technician
POA
42 52
Public Information Officer
Manager/Professional/Technical
_
74 84
Public Safety Dispatcher I
Police Officers Association
46 56
Public Safety Dispatcher II
Police Officers Association
52 62
Dated: August 25, 2025
(JP* (1440tottr4G2t953au

Page 2 of 2 ends

Position
MOU Assigned To
Salary
Range
First Step
7 op Step
Public Works Inspector
SEIU
61 71
Public Works Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
74 84
Purchasing Manager
Manger/Professional/Technical
74 84
Records Technician
SEIU
48 58
Recreation Coordinator
SEIU _
48 58
Recreation Specialist
SEIU
29 39
Recreation Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
71 81
Senior Engineer
Manager/Professional/Technical
76 86
Senior Management Analyst
Manager/Professional/Technical
67 77
Senior Planner
Manager/Professional/Technical
72 82
Street Maintenance Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
63 73
Street Maintenance Worker
SEIU
48 58
Support Services Specialist I
Police Officers Association
36 46
Support Services Specialist II
Police Officers Association
42 52
Support Services Supervisor
Police Officers Association
62 72
Transit Manager
Manager/Professional/Technical
76 86
Transit Supervisor _
Manager/Professional/Technical
65 75
Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
67 77
Wastewater Collections Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
64 74
Wastewater Collection System Worker I
SEIU
50 60
Wastewater Collection System Worker II
SEIU
54 64
Wastewater Plant Operator I
SEIU
55 65
Wastewater Plant Operator II
SEIU
61 71
Wastewater Plant Operator III
SEIU
65 75
Wastewater Plant Operator IV
SEIU
69 79
Wastewater Plant Operator V
SEIU
73 83
Wastewater Plant Supervisor
Manager/Professional/Technical
69 79
Water Safety Instructor
SEIU
29 34
Dated: August 25, 2025
unRwiErinligAsgtioliNI

Page 3 of 2 ends

Page 1150 of 1893 ends

City of Beaumont
Salary Range Table
Effective 1/1/2025
Step
Annual
Monthly
Bi-Weckly
Hourly
0 5 17.638.-14
S 1.-169.87
078.40
S 8.48 '
I
5 18.075?4
S 1.506.27
S
S 8,692
S 18.532.8))
S 1.544, 10
S :11.80
S 8,91
3 5 18.990.,6
5 1 582.53
5 730 40
4 S 19.468.80
S 1.622.11)
S
5 S
S 1
S
S
6 S 2).446.44
S 1.703.87
S
7 5 20.966.40
S 1.7.17.20
S
S 0.08
8 $ 21.186.36
S 1.790.53
9 S 22.027.2))
S I
S
10 ` 22.588.80
S
11 5 _
S 1.929.20
5 I .13
12 $ •
S 1
S I
13 S 21.315.24
$
S 1.6')
14 S 24.918.36
$ 2.076.53
b 958.-10
1 .98
15 S
$ 2.128.53
S
S
16 5 26.187.24
ti 2.182.27
S
17 $ -,,, v:1 1111
5 -) 7:l. (lfl
5 ., _ `. ,,, I
ti
18 5 27.518..61
5 2._93?0
S .058.40
S I
19 '
5 28.201_80
5 2.350.10
.084.80
S 3.56
20 15

28.911.96
5 2,4.09.33
S 112.00
S 13.')0
21 5 _'..9.619.24
S 2.46827 '
5 .139.21)
5 1 1.2-1
22 5 30.368.04
5 2.530.67
S .16800
S 11.60
23 5 31.1 16.84
5 2.593.07
S 196.80
$ 1.96
24 S 31.907.16
S 2.658.9.,
S I
$
25 5 32.697.4)0 ,
S
S 1.257 60
26 S 33.508.81) '

2.'92.10
S 1.288.80
27 $ 34,361.64
$ 2,863.47
$ 1,321.60
$ 16.52
28 $ 35,214.36
$ 2,934.53
$ 1,354.40
$ 16.93.
29 $ 36,087.96
$ 3,007.33
$ 1,388.00
$ 17.35
30 $ 37,003.20
$ 3,083.60
$ 1,423.20
$ 17.79
31 $ 37,918.44
$ 3,159.87
$ 1,458.40
$ 18.23
32 $ 38,875.20
$ 3,239.60
$ 1,495.20
$ 18.69
33 $ 39,852.84
$ 3,321.07
$ 1,532.80
$ 19.16
34 $ 40,830.36
$ 3,402.53
$ 1,570.40
$ 19.63
35 $ 41,849.64
$ 3,487.47
$ 1,609.60
$ 20.12
36 $ 42,910.44
$ 3,575.87
$ 1,650.40
$ 20.63 _
37 $ 43,971.24
$ 3,664.27
$ 1,691.20
$ 21.14
38 $ 45,073.56
$ 3,756.13
$ 1,733.60
$ 21.67
39 $ 46,196.76
$ 3,849.73
$ 1,776.80
$ 22.21
40 $ 47,361.60
$ 3,946.80
$ 1,821.60
$ 22.77
41 $ 48,547.20
$ 4,045.60
$ 1,867.20
$ 23.34
42 $ 49,753.56
$ 4,146.13
$ 1,913.60
$ 23.92
43 $ 51,001.56
$ 4,250.13
$ 1,961.60
$ 24.52
44 $ 52,270.44
$ 4,355.87
$ 2,010.40
$ 25.13
45 $ 53,580.84
$ 4,465.07
$ 2,060.80
$ 25.76
46 $ 54,932.76
$ 4,577.73
$ 2,112.80
$ 26.41
47 $ 56,305.56
$ 4,692.13
$ 2,165.60
$ 27.07
48 $ 57,699.24
$ 4,808.27
$ 2,219.20
$ 27.74
49 $ 59,155.20
$ 4,929.60
$ 2,275.20
$ 28.44
50 $ 60,632.04
$ 5,052.67
$ 2,332.00
$ 29.15
51 $ 62,150.40
$ 5,179.20
$ 2,390.40
$ 29.88
52 $ 63,689.64
$ 5,307.47
$ 2,449.60
$ 30.62
53 $ 65,291.16
$ 5,440.93
$ 2,511.20
$ 31.39
54 $ 66,913.56
$ 5,576.13
$ 2,573.60
$ 32.17
55 $ 68,598.36
$ 5,716.53
$ 2,638.40
$ 32.98
56 $ 70,304.04
$ 5,858.67
$ 2,704.00
$ PIV
151
Step
Annual
Monthly
Bi-Weckly
Ilourly
57 $ 72.072.00
$ 6,006.00
$ 2,772.00
$ 34.65
58 $ 73,860.84
$ 6,155.07
$ 2,840.80
$ 35.51
59 $ 75,711.96
$ 6,309.33
$ 2,912.00
$ 36.40
60 I
$ 77,604.84
$ 6,467.07
$ 2,984.80
$ 37.31
61 $ 79,539.24
$ 6,628.27
$ 3,059.20
$ 38.24
62 $ 81,536.04
$ 6,794.67
$ 3,136.00
$ 39.20
63 $ 83,574.36
$ 6,964.53
$ 3,214.40
$ 40.18
64 $ 85,654.44
$ 7,137.87
$ 3,294.40
$ 41.18
65 $ 87,796.80
$ 7,316.40
$ 3,376.80
$ 42.21
66 $ 90,001.56
$ 7,500.13
$ 3,461.60
$ 43.27
67 $ 92,247.96
$ 7,687.33
$ 3,548.00
$ 44.35
68 $ 94,556.76
$ 7,879.73
$ 3,636.80
$ 45.46
69 $ 96,927.96
$ 8,077.33
$ 3,728.00
$ 46.60
70 $ 99,361.56
$ 8,280.13
$ 3,821.60
$ 47.77
71 $ 101,816.04
$ 8,484.67
$ 3,916.00
$ 48.95
72 $ 104,374.44
$ 8,697.87
$ 4,014.40
$ 50.18
73 $ 106,974.36
$ 8,914.53
$ 4,114.40
74 $ 109,657.56
$ 9,138.13
$ 4.217.60
$ 52.72
75 $ 112,403.16
$ 9,366.93
$ 4,323.20
$ 54.04
76 $ 115,211.16
$ 9,600.93
$ 4,431.20
77 $ 118,081.56
$ 9,840.13
$ 4,541.60
$ 56.77
78 $ 121,035.24
$ 10,086.27
$ 4,655.20
$ 58.19
79 $ 124,071.96
$ 10,339.33
$ 4,772.00
$ 59.65
80 $ 127,171.20
$ 10,597.60
$ 4,891.20
$ 61.14
81 $ 130,353.60
$ 10,862.80
$ 5,013.60
$ 62.67
82 $ 133,598.40
$ 11,133.20
$ 5,138.40
$ 64.23
83 $ 136,947.24
$ 11,412.27
$ 5,267.20
$ 65.84
84 $ 140,358.36
$ 11,696.53
$ 5,398.40
$ 67.48
85 $ 143,873.64
$ 11,989.47
$ 5,533.60
$ 69.17
86 $ 147,471.96
$ 12,289.33
$ 5,672.00
$ 70.90
87 $ 151,153.56
$ 12,596.13
$ 5,813.60
$ 72.67
88 $ 154,939.20
$ 12,911.60
$ 5,959.20
$ 74.49
89 $ 158,808.00
$ 13,234.00
$ 6,108.00
$ 76.35
90 $ 162,780.84
$ 13,565.07
$ 6,260.80
$ 78.26
91 $ 166,857.60
$ 13,904.80
$ 6,417.60
$ 80.22
92 $ 171,017.64
$ 14,251.47
$ 6,577.60
$ 82.22
93 $ 175,302.36
$ 14,608.53
$ 6,742.40
$ 84.28
94 $ 179,691.24
$ 14,974.27
$ 6,911.20
$ 86.39
95 $ 184,163.16
$ 15,346.93
$ 7,083.20
$ 88.54
96 $ 188,780.76
$ 15,731.73
$ 7,260.80
$ 90.76
97 $ 193,502.40
$ 16,125.20
$ 7,442.40
$ 93.03
98 $ 198,327.96
$ 16,527.33
$ 7,628.00
$ 95.35
99 $ 203,299.20
$ 16,941.60
$ 7,819.20
$ 97.74
100
$ 208,374.36
$ 17,364.53
$ 8,014.40
$ 100.18
101
$ 213,574.44
$ 17,797.87
$ 8,214.40
$ 102.68
102
$ 218,919.96
$ 18,243.33
$ 8,420.00
$ 105.25
103
$ 224,390.40
$ 18,699.20
$ 8,630.40
$ 107.88
104
$ 230,006.40
$ 19,167.20
$ 8,846.40
$ 110.58
105
$ 235,747.20
$ 19,645.60
$ 9,067.20
$ 113.34
106
$ 241,633.56
$ 20,136.13
$ 9,293.60
$ 116.17
107
$ 247,665.60
$ 20,638.80
$ 9.525.60
$ 119.07
108
$ 253,863.96
$ 21,155.33
$ 9,764.00
$ 122.05
109
$ 260,208.00
$ 21,684.00
$ 10,008.00
$ 125.10
110
$ 266,718.36
$ 22,226.53
$ 10,258.40
$ 128.23
111
$ 273,395.16
$ 22,782.93
$ 10,515.20
$ 131.44
��
3 ui li 4°
$'20
87,247 .96
$ 23,937.33
$ 11,048.00
$ 138.10

Page 1152 of 1893 ends

Chief of Police
/
Operations Captain
Support Captain
� 1 L
Operations Lieutenant 1
Patrol Team 1 Sergeant
Patrol Team 2 Sergeant
Dispatch Supervisor 1
Operations Lieutenant 2
Patrol Team 3 Sergeant
Patrol Team 4 Sergeant
Dispatch Supervisor 2
Support Lieutenant
Detective Sergeant
COPPS Sergeant
Traffic Sergeant
Support Services Supervisor

Page 1153 of 1893 ends

BEAUMONT
-C A L I F O R N A -
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Robert L. Vestal, Public Works Director
Dustin Christensen, Principal Engineer
DATE: September 2, 2025
SUBJECT: First Street Widening Feasibility Study Results — Capital Improvement Project (CIP) No. R25-04
Description: Strategic Plan Target 2 — Infrastructure, Projects, and Traffic — Goal 5 — Advance the First Street Widening project through the Design Phase to improve traffic flow, enhance safety, and support future growth and development in the area.

Background and Analysis:

On October 29, 2024, the City awarded a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to MNS Engineers, Inc., to conduct a feasibility study for widening First Street between Beaumont Avenue and Pennsylvania Avenue. The feasibility study focused on identifying the engineering, environmental, and permitting requirements needed to widen First Street, as well as providing cost estimates for design and construction. The scope included the following:
• Survey for Right -of -Way (R/W) verification and grade elevations. • Property and R/W research to determine existing vs. ultimate R/W, and potential property acquisitions.
• Drainage review to determine proper stormwater flow and access to existing storm drains.
• Edison relocation/undergrounding requirements.
• Utility coordination/relocation (storm drain, water, sewer, gas, dry utilities). • Preliminary environmental review to determine California Environmental Act (CEQA) level of effort, as well as regulatory permitting requirements. • Funding requirements, including any opportunities for development related funding.
• Summary of the level of effort and scope needed to complete the design. • Design and construction cost estimates.

Page 1154 of 1893 ends

Feasibility Study Results:

Right -of -Way Acquisition - The report identified that the acquisition of right-of-way will be a major consideration for the project. The following table summarizes the R/W needs for the project.

RIGHT OF WAY AREAS
Description
Quantity
Unit
Subject
APN 418-260-023
2,249
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-260-024
1,549
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-270-031
1,701
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-270-032
6,525
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-270-039
938
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-270-040
2,102
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-310-007
8,300
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-320-007
3,499
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-320-011,-012
3,802
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-250-007
4,349
sf

RAN ACQUISITION
APN 418-250-010
4,019
sf

WW ACQUISITION
APN 418-260-013
4,164
sf
RfW ACQUISITION
APN 418-260-014
4,199
sf

RJW ACQUISITION
APN 418-330-017
1,679
sf

RANI ACQUISITION
APN 418-330-018
3,799
sf

RAW ACQUISITION
APN 418-330-020
982
sf

RAW ACQUISITION
APN 418-330-022
838
sf

WW ACQUISITION
APN 418-330-023
664
sf

RAW ACQUISITION
APN 418-341-007
2,000
sf

RIW ACQUISITION
APN 418-341-009
4,199
sf

RAY ACQUISITION
APN 418-341-030
700
sf

F ,'W ACQUISITION
APN 418-341-039
799
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
Table 1- Property Acquisition Summary
Drainage: The report reviewed the existing topography and drainage constraints within the project. The project is outside of the 100 -year flood plain. Existing culverts will need to be extended/upsized, and stormwater biofiltration units may be required.

Utilities: Utility research indicated various utilities within the R/W, including water, sewer, electrical, gas, and dry utilities. Most of these utilities will be impacted by the project and will need to be lowered/relocated. The most affected utility will be the electrical lines and

Page 1155 of 1893 ends

power poles (Edison). The Edison poles and lines will need to be undergrounded for the length of the project.

Environmental Review: The project will require compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If federal funding is acquired for construction, the project will also require compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Various environmental technical studies will be needed, including Agricultural, Biological, Cultural, Air Quality, Noise, and Paleontological. It is anticipated that an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) will be the appropriate level of CEQA documentation.

Compliance with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) will be required since the project is increasing the capacity of the street. Regulatory Permitting is also expected, with possible permits from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW).

Preliminary Design Layout: A preliminary design layout was provided showing plan views and cross sections of the street widening. This layout was based on the 100 -foot ultimate width of the street section. A portion of the preliminary design layout is provided below for reference:

LEGEND

PAVEMENT WIDENING
=SIDEWALK
'LANDSCAPE

FIBER LINES

GAS LINES

24. RCP CROSSINGS

SCE OH LINES

POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
w
z
w
ate!
z
o
2 a
111
m
EXISTING 24. RCP

EXTENSION
NEEDED. TO BE

DESIGNED IN THE
NEXT PHASE.

ABBREVIATIONS
EP • EDGE OF PAVEMENT

SW - SIDEWALK

BL - BIKE LANE
ETW • EDGE OFTRAVELED WAY

CL - CENTERLINE

FL FLOWLINE

PVW - RIGHT OF WAY

RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

L S - LANDSCAPE
APN 418-270-042
APN 418-310-007
Figure 2- Preliminary Design Layout
APN 418-270-039
SW
LANDSCA.

EXISTING STREET

LIGHTING TO BE

RELOCATED TO NEW

SIDEWALKITYPICALI
APN 418-270-032

ROADSIDE DITCH FLOWLINE

TO BE GRADED TO CONVEY

FLOW TO THE EXISTING
CROSS CULV€RTS, DETAILS

ANALYSIS AND SIZING TO BE

STODIING IN THE NEXT
PRASE.

EXISTING SGE

DISTRIBUTION
POLES. POLES AND

LINES TO BE

RELOCATED BY
OTHERS {TYPICAL]
APN 418-270-040
1ST STREET

PLAN VIEW
SCALE: 1'=50' N
A

Page 1156 of 1893 ends

Cost Estimates: The study provided the following preliminary cost estimates for design and construction of the project:

Project Management
Meetings, Schedule, Contract
$50,000
Preliminary Design
(30% Concept Aporoval)
Alternative Screening and Selection
$50.004
Environmental Clearance (CEQA)
Technical Studies, Environmental Document
$60,000
Utility Coordination and Relocations
Utility Letters, Utility Relocation Coordination
$15,000
Drainage Analysis and Reports
Hydraulics and Hydrology Analysis, Drainage Report
$30,000
Geotechnical Analysis and Reports
Geatech Explorations and Report
$30,000
Right of Way Coordination
Right of Way Requirement Maps
$25,000
6C% PS&E
Plans, Specifications and Estimate
S290,000
95°Io P5&E
Plans, Specifications and Estimate
$90.000
100% PS&E
Plans, Specifications and Estimate
$55,000
RE File & Bid Support
As-Builts
$15.000
TOTAL,"
3700,000
Figure 2 — Design Cost Estimates (*does not include R/W acquisition Costs) Roadway
Roadway Ex, Pavement, Concrete,'C&G, Sidewalk, Curb Ramps $1.690,300
Traffic
Signing and Striping, Signal Mods, Electrical/Lighting
$745,000
Temporary Traffic Control
Temporary harriers, signage
Drainage
Pipe, Catch Basins, override Drains, BMP's
$562,500
Landscapiing
Hardscaping, Planting
$100,000
Miscellaneous
Relocation of fences, gates, removals, and minor items
$155,500
Mobilization

1.0%
$328,400
Contingency
25%
$897,500
TOTAL'
$4,487, 500
Figure 3 — Construction Cost Estimates
Next Steps: The study outlines the following next steps that the City needs to take to move forward with the project design:
• Complete the preliminary design and 30% level plans and specifications. • Complete the environmental document.
• Acquire the necessary right-of-way.
• Complete the final design plans, specifications, and bid documents. • Bid and construction of the project.

The completion of the feasibility study completes the current phase of the project. The City will need to prepare and advertise an RFP to award the next phase of the project.

At this time, staff recommends advertising an RFP to complete the preliminary design and the environmental document, utilizing the remaining budget from CIP R25-04.

Page 1157 of 1893 ends

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this staff report is estimated to be $350.

Completion of the preliminary design and environmental document will be paid from CIP R25-04 First Street Widening Feasibility Study and Preliminary Engineering. A future item will be brought to the City Council for a contract award for design.

The following table is a summary of the funding and budget for CIP R25-04 First Street Widening Feasibility Study and Preliminary Engineering:

CIP R25-04 1st Street Widening Feasibility Study Project Funding Summary
Estimated Total Project Budget= $500,000
Current Project Budget= $500,000
Nmom

DIF - R&B,
$500,000 , 100%
CIP R25-04 1st Street Widening Feasibility Study Project Budget Summary Project
Component
Est. Total
Budget
Current Paid to Remaining
Budget Date Budget
Project Managem iglill
en
Preliminary Services
$65,000 I $65,000 $(53,047)
$11,953
Environmental
Design
■L $435,000 ■ $435,000
�■ $435,000
Permits
Mai Alba
Right -of -Way
MI NM
•
Construction
Construction Management 1IW �TT
Equipment
$500,000
$500,000
$ 53,047
$446,953

Page 1158 of 1893 ends

Recommended Action:

Direct City staff to move forward with the preliminary design and environmental document for the First Street Widening in agreement with the First Street Widening Feasibility Study.

Attachments:

A. First Street Widening Feasibility Study
B. Presentation

Page 1159 of 1893 ends

MNS
City of Beaumont
1St Street Widening Feasibility Study
City Project No. C24-124

CONSULTANT
MNS ENGINEERS, INC.

Riverside Office 3850 Vine Street, Suite 110
(LOCAL OFFICE) Riverside, CA 92507

PROJECT

CONTACT
Hector Salcedo, PE — Project Manager
760.500.7790 mobile I [email protected]
AUTHORIZED Brandon Reyes, PE — Principal
SIGNATURE 951.532.4510 mobile I [email protected] June 10, 2025
TITLE PAGE Page 1160 of 1893

C-) MNS
Contents
15' Street Widening Feasibility Study
1 SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION 2

1.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2

1.2. BACKGROUND 2
SECTION 2. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 4

2.1. ROADWAY 4

2.2. DRAINAGE 5

2.2.1. ROADWAY DRAINAGE STANDARDS 5

2.2.2. WATERWAYS 5

2.2.3. FLOODPLAIN ENCROACHMENT 5

2.2.4. STORM WATER TREATMENT 6

2.2.5. PROPOSED DRAINAGE FACILITIES 6

2.3. UTILITIES 6

2.4. RIGHT OF WAY 8
SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL 9

3.1. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 9
SECTION 4. FUNDING 11

4.1. FUNDING ANALYSIS 11
SECTION 5. COST ESTIMATE 13

5.1. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE AND DESIGN (PS&E) 13

5.2. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERS ESTIMATE 13
SECTION 6. SUMMARY 14

6.1. RECOMMENDATION 14

6.2. NEXT STEPS 15
SECTION 7. ATTACHMENTS 16
A. VICINITY MAP 16
B. LAYOUT PLAN EXHIBIT 16
C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS MEMORANDUM 16
D. DRAINAGE EXHIBITS 16
E. UTILITY AS-BUILTS 16
F. RIGHT OF WAY IMPACTS EXHIBIT 16
G. FEE ESTIMATE - ENVIRONMENTAL AND FINAL DESIGN 16
H. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 16

Page 1161 of 1893 ends

MNS
Section 1. Introduction
15' Street Widening Feasibility Study

1.1. Project Description
The City of Beaumont (City) with assistance from MNS Engineering proposed to conduct a feasibility study of widening 1st Street between Beaumont Avenue and Pennsylvania Avenue (project), see Attachment A for a Vicinity Map. The project focused on the following items:
➢ Roadway Improvements
➢ Environmental Impacts
➢ Drainage Impacts
➢ Utility Impacts
➢ Right of Way Impacts
➢ Cost of Future Design and Construction Phases
Purpose and Need
Purpose: The purpose of the project is to identify engineering and environmental impacts of widening 1st Street to its ultimate width and scope the future costs of the project phases, and to provide engineering alternatives where feasible.

Need: 1st Street currently is one lane in each direction and requires widening to accommodate the future land use designations and roadway classifications per the City's general plan.

1.2. Background
Existing Conditions
1st Street is a major road that runs east -west from Veile Avenue to the West and Highland Springs Avenue to the East. It is the City's primary road south of Interstate 10 (I-10) and serves as the main route to get to the I-10/Beaumont Avenue and I- 10/Highland Springs Interchanges for the community located south of the freeway. 2 Within the project limits 1st Street is a 2 -lane facility with a shared two-way left turn lane. In the westbound direction, the roadside consists of dike from Pennsylvania Ave to Maple Avenue and then curb & gutter from Maple Avenue to Beaumont Avenue. There is approximately a total of 500 feet of sidewalk in two spot locations. A Class II bike lane runs along the westbound direction. In the eastbound direction, the roadside consists of dike from Beaumont Avenue to approximately 400 feet before Maple Avenue and then curb & gutter to approximately 400 feet before Pennsylvania Avenue. There is approximately a total of 250 feet of sidewalk. A Class II bike lane runs along the eastbound direction. There are residential and commercial driveways located on both sides of the road.

Pavement conditions along 1st Street are relatively good, with minor cracking. This project would recommend widening the existing road and maintaining the existing pavement as much as possible. Further pavement analysis and geotechnical analysis shall be done in future phases.

Page 1162 of 1893 ends

MNS
1St Street Widening Feasibility Study
General Plan Consistency
The City's December 2020 General Plan provides the framework for mobility goals in the City. The general plan classifies 1st Street as a Major Highway (Raised Median) within our project limits.

ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
Proposed Roadways
Freeway
Expressway A
}r Expressway B
- Urban Arterial Highway
- Arterlal Highway (4 Lanes)
Wei Arterial Highway Frontage
- Arterial Highway (2 Lanes)
- Major Highway {Painted Median)
- Major Highway {Raised Median)
UNIDO. Major Frontage
- Downtown Streets
- Secondary Streets
t=om- Secondary Frontage
Collector Streets {4 Lanes)
Industrial Collector {Painted Median)
Industrial Collector (Raised Median)
2 AW.s
I I
I 3

Page 1163 of 1893 ends

0 MNS
15' Street Widening Feasibility Study
Section 2. Preliminary Engineering
Et'imadvar
I 6' I 6'
Si I 8' 12'
I Trav I 12
Land- Sid Bike Travel Lane Travel Lane
scaping walk Lane
12'
Median
100'
Right-of-way
t t
12'
Travel Lane
12'
Travel Lane
8'
Bike
Lane
tt■
I Side- I Land- I
walk scaping

4. 2.1. Roadway
The proposed improvements for this project include the following:
➢ Widening from a 2 -lane facility to a 4 -lane facility ➢ Convert striped median to a raised median
➢ Addition of curb and gutter, and sidewalks (gap closure) ➢ Improving bicycle and pedestrian facilities with bike lanes, and standard curb ramps ➢ Maintaining an/or improve access to existing driveways 4 Corridor Needs
An 8 -foot shoulder is recommended when shared with bike lanes, consistent with built out portion of 1st Street east of Pennsylvania Ave. Per the City's general plan, 1st Street within the project limits is a bicycle and pedestrian priority corridor. It is also identified as an auto -priority corridor, which requires an elevated level of service. Another alternative identified is to convert/build a 5 or 6 -foot shoulder with a physical buffer of 2 or 3 feet classifying the bike lane as a Class IV facility (see Attachment B for a Layout Plan Exhibit and Buffered Bike Lane Variation Exhibit). The project will need to balance both aspects of improving a heavily vehicle -traveled facility while providing a safe route for pedestrians and bicycles. Conceptual bike facilities can be studied early in the preliminary engineering/environmental phase to make sure the Cities' goals are met. If a switch to Class IV facilities is made, consideration of barrier limits at intersections, signal operations, and barrier protection would need to be considered.

The existing vertical geometry along 1st Street consists of a rolling terrain, with 2 sag curves and 2 crest curves. The existing vertical curves range from 500 feet to 550 feet for sag curves, and 400 feet to 500 feet crest curves. The curves meet a design speed between 40 mph and 45 mph. To meet a design speed of 50 mph which is the standard for the proposed roadway classification, it would require flattening out the existing profile which would mean a full reconstruction of the road. Further detailed profile design will be evaluated in the next project phase. For this study it was assumed the existing profile will be maintained.

Local Access Impacts
The project pavement widening would be staged in a way that would allow the road to stay open during construction with an emphasis of local access to businesses and residents to be maintained during construction, which is realistic for this project.

The project will install a raised median that will allow for left turns at major intersections of 1st Street/Maple Avenue and 1st Street/Michigan Avenue. Maple Avenue and Michigan Avenue were considered major since they provide connections to 3rd Street and Potrero Blvd respectively. The remainder of the local access points along the corridor will be right-in/right-out streets.

Page 1164 of 1893 ends

MNS
15' Street Widening Feasibility Study
I 5
Intersection & Various Improvements
Due to the widening of 1st Street at the intersections of Pennsylvania Avenue and Beaumont Avenue, curb returns will need to be re-established, which will require relocation of a signal pole. One signal pole will be impacted at the northwest quadrant of the Pennsylvania/1st Street intersection. The remainder of the signal poles at the Pennsylvania Avenue and Beaumont Avenue should not be impacted since the poles would still fall within the proposed sidewalk area; ADA compliance would need to be confirmed.

Detailed intersection and signal layouts will be verified during subsequent design phases of the project. Traffic improvements will include new striping and relocated signage due to the widening of the road in each direction of travel. Standard City street lighting also currently exists along 1st Street and would need to be relocated behind the new curb in each direction. See Attachment B for a Layout Plan Exhibit.

2.2. Drainage
Drainage Master Plans
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District authored a Drainage Master Plan dated July 1983 covering the City of Beaumont and surrounding areas. The Drainage Master Plan provide any hydrologic data and does not propose any stormwater facilities along 1st Street within the project limits.

Existing Storm Drain System
Within the project limits, there are three culverts which convey flows from the north side of 1st Street to the south, maintaining the natural drainage pattern. The first culvert, located near Beaumont Avenue, is a 24" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) installed as part of the Arco gas station improvements constructed in 2009. The first culvert outlet has a concrete headwall. The second culvert is located approximately 250' east of the Maple Avenue intersection. The second culvert consists of two 24" RCP storm drains with grouted rip rap at the end of each pipe. The second culvert has a concrete headwall inlet and outlet. The third culvert is approximately 260' west of the intersection with Pennsylvania Avenue. The third culvert consists of three 24" RCP with grouted rip rap at each pipe. The third culvert has a concrete headwall outlet. Graded ditches convey overland flow to and from the third culvert.

Asphalt overside drains or catch basins were placed at the local roadway sag points. Record drawings are provided in Attachment D.

2.2.1. Roadway Drainage Standards
The project would follow the Riverside County Transportation Department Plan Check Guidelines, Section V: Drainage (Drainage Guidelines). Per the Drainage Guidelines the 10 -year frequency storm shall be contained below the tops of curb, and the 100 -year frequency storm shall be contained within the street right of way, for the on -site flows.

For the roadside flows (off -site) existing drainage patterns will be maintained. In general, within our project site, off -site flows travel from the north side of 1st Street and cross over through 24" existing culverts and continue flow south of 1st Street. Our project would investigate placing earthen roadside ditches along the northerly portion of 1st Street and have flow conveyed similarly to the existing conditions to the crossing culverts.

2.2.2. Waterways
Based on a review of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Quadrangle map attached as Attachment D, no "blue line" streams cross 1st Street within the project limits. However, based on field reviews there are ephemeral or intermittent drainage that would require permits from CDFW, the RWQCB and possible the Army Corps.

2.2.3. Floodplain Encroachment
Based on a review of FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) 06065C0811G and 06065C0812G, 1st Street is outside the 100 -year floodplain. FIRM maps are provided in Attachment D.

Page 1165 of 1893 ends

MNS

2.2.4. Stormwater Treatment
1st Street Widening Feasibility Study I 6
Proposed Riverside County projects need to abide by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Santa Ana Region Order No. R8-2010-0033, NPDES Permit No. CAS618033 for Stormwater (Wet Weather) and Non-Stormwater (Dry Weather) Discharge from the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems. Per Section I II — Project Evaluation of Low Impact Development: Guidance and Standards for Transportation Projects for the Santa Ana Reqion Riverside County Co-Permittees. The NPDES permit states:
"Transportation Projects shall incorporate the following LID Principals and BMPs to the maximum extent practicable:
➢ Conservation of natural areas to the extent feasible
➢ Minimization of the impervious footprint
➢ Minimization of disturbances to natural drainage
➢ Design and construction of pervious areas to receive runoff from impervious areas ➢ Use of landscaping minimizes irrigation and runoff, promotes surface infiltration, and minimizes the use of pesticides and fertilizers.

The extent to which these design principles may be incorporated into a project using LID Principles and BMPs techniques depends on the project type and the project -specific feasibility analysis." As the project will provide curb and gutter and sidewalks, the green elements within an urban street parkway may be feasible for implementation. Biofiltration cells or bioretention areas within the parkway could be installed upstream of proposed catch basins to intercept first flush flows prior to discharge into the natural drainage courses.

2.2.5. Proposed Drainage Facilities
The project will implement drainage improvements which maintain the existing drainage pattern of the surrounding roadway. This preliminary drainage assessment does not include hydrologic and hydraulic analyses; therefore, the existing cross culverts have not been evaluated for hydraulic capacity. The final sizing of proposed drainage facilities will be contingent upon the hydraulic analysis performed during final design.

The proposed drainage facilities will consist of extending the existing cross culverts and reconstructing headwalls and grouted rip rap to continue to convey flow under the roadway to existing drainage pathways. With construction of curb and gutter and sidewalk, the overside drains will be replaced with catch basins. Existing catch basins will need to be removed and constructed at the new curb line. The need for additional catch basins will be determined by hydraulic analysis for a wider roadway, determining the spacing required to maintain adequate unflooded width per the County of Riverside's design standards. Ditches should be provided on the north side of lst Street where the roadway is in a fill condition to convey flows to the nearest cross culvert.

2.3. Utilities
Utility research was initiated via the Dig Alert website to establish a list of potential utility companies in and around the Proposed Project Area, see Attachment E Utility As-Builts. Requests for as-builts were sent out on December 16th, 2024, to the following companies:

1. AT&T

2. Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District

3. Frontier/Verizon

4. Southern California Edison

5. Southern California Gas

6. Charter/Spectrum

Page 1166 of 1893 ends

MNS
1St Street Widening Feasibility Study
The following table represents the companies that responded with information on their utilities within the project area:

Utility Summary
Utility Type
Owner
Potential Impact-
As-Builts
Electrical
Southern California Edison (SCE)
Distribution line poles
Received
Gas
Southern California Gas
High-pressure natural gas pipe
Received
Water
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water
District (BCVWD)
Fire hydrants, water valves, culvert
crossings
Pending
Wireless/Communication
AT&T
No Facilities
No Facilities
Frontier (Verizon)
Conduit facilities
Copper facilities
Fiber optic facilities
Received
Charter/Spectrum
Underground and Overhead lines
Received
7 The City is believed to have prior rights in this corridor and during future phases of the project utility, coordination will be maintained and updated as the project moves into final design and construction, with the following initial observations:

Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District
It is assumed that BCVWD line or valve relocations will be done by the utility company since the City has prior rights along the project limits. There are existing fire hydrants, water valves and pipe culvert crossings that will be impacted with the project. There are 3 different 24" RCP crossings along 1st street that will need to be extended due to the project.

Frontier/Verizon
It is assumed that Frontier/Verizon line relocations will be done by the utility company since the City has prior rights along the project limits. There are copper and fiber lines that run along the north side of 1st Street through our project limits. The copper and fiber lines are joint poles with SCE. Positive identification of the line will be done in future phases when utility lines are potholed.

Southern California Edison
It is assumed that SCE pole relocations will be done by the utility company since the City has prior rights along the project limits.

Coordination with SCE will be done in the subsequent phases of the project to provide them with close to 95% plans for them to design their facility whether they underground or move poles. SCE schedule of pole relocations or underground design will be a critical path item, as they can take between 12-18 months to finalize their design. An approximate cost to underground SCE lines may vary depending on current construction market activities, but for planning purposes cost to underground SCE lines is approximately $3000 per linear foot.

Southern California Gas
It is assumed that SoCal Gas line and/or valve relocations will be done by the utility company since the City has prior rights along the project limits. There is a 30" high pressure gas line that runs along the southerly portion of 1st Street through our project limits.

Positive identification of the line will be done in future phases when utility lines are potholed. During the environmental phase of the project utility coordination will continue, during the PS&E phase of the project utility potholing, relocation letters and utility relocation plans will be coordinated with each utility owner.

Charter/Spectrum
It is assumed that Charter/Spectrum line relocations will be done by the utility company since the City has prior rights along the project limits. There are underground and overhead lines that run along the north side of 1st Street through our project limits. The underground lines generally run from Beaumont Avenue to Magnolia Avenue and the overhead lines generally run from Magnolia Avenue to Maple Avenue. Positive identification of the line will be done in future phases when utility lines are potholed.

Page 1167 of 1893 ends

MNS
15' Street Widening Feasibility Study
I 8

2.4. Right of Way
For this project there will be a need to acquire right of way. See Attachment F — Right of Way Impacts Exhibit. The impacted properties are commercial and residential property types, impacting twenty-three assessors' parcel lots. The table below describes the type of impact on each of these lots:

Parcels with Right of Way Impacts
418-270-042
Commercial
Existing driveway impact due to widening. Project will replace existing driveway.
418-270-039
Commercial
Existing driveway and property fence impact due to widening.

Project will replace existing driveway and fence.
418-270-032
Commercial
Existing driveway and property landscaping impact due to widening. Project will replace existing driveway and landscaping. 418-270-040
Commercial
Existing driveway and property landscaping impact due to widening. Project will replace existing driveway and landscaping. 418-270-031
Single Family Residential
Existing driveway impact due to widening. Project will replace existing driveway.
418-260-024
Single Family Residential
Existing fence impact due to widening. Project will replace existing fence.
418-260-023
Commercial
Existing driveway impact due to widening. Project will replace existing driveway.
418-310-007
Vacant
Vacant land
418-320-011
Vacant
Vacant land
418-320-012
Vacant
Vacant land
418-330-020
Single Family Residential
Existing fence impact due to widening. Project will replace existing fence
418-330-023
Single Family Residential
Existing fence impact due to widening. Project will replace existing fence
418-330-022
Single Family Residential
Existing fence impact due to widening. Project will replace existing fence
418-330-017
Vacant
Vacant land
418-330-018
Single Family Residential
Existing fence impact due to widening. Project will replace existing fence
418-250-007
Vacant
Trees removed to create space for relocation of overhead electrical poles
418-250-010
Vacant
Trees removed to create space for relocation of overhead electrical poles
418-341-007
Commercial
Existing driveway and property wall impact due to widening. Project will replace existing driveway and property wall
418-341-039
Commercial
Existing driveway and property wall impact due to widening. Project will replace existing driveway and property wall
418-341-030
Single Family Residential
Existing driveway and property wall impact due to widening. Project will replace existing driveway.
418-341-009
Vacant
Vacant land
418-260-013
Vacant
Vacant land
418-260-014
Vacant
Vacant land
Most of the property impacts occur along the westbound side of 1st Street. On the eastbound side there are a few residential homes that will be impacted as well. The existing right of way width along 1st Street is 90 feet near the intersection of Beaumont Avenue and 80 feet the rest of the project length. There will be an additional 20 feet of right of way that will need to be obtained as part of this project.

Page 1168 of 1893 ends

MNS
15' Street Widening Feasibility Study
I 9
Property impacts may be minimized by reducing lane widths and reduction in the raised median width, for purposes of this study and analyzing the total impacts of what an ultimate section would look like a worst -case scenario approach was taken.

Widening to one side of the road was considered but caused full takes of residential or commercial lots on the opposite side of the road, so this option was not studied further. Alternatively, widening and shifting traffic on both sides of the road was considered to limit impacts to residential and commercial lots, but this option would have introduced two reversing curves with short tangents lengths in between before having to shift again, so this option was not studied further.

Section 3. Environmental

3.1. Environmental Constraints
Below is a brief summary and recommendation for each section of the Environmental Constraints Analysis.

Agricultural Resources
➢ Summary: Land is designated as urban or farmland of local importance; no active farming or Williamson Act contracts. ➢ Recommendation: Include a site -specific analysis of past agricultural use in the CEQA document.

Biological Resources
➢ Summary: No special -status species or vegetation communities observed, but suitable habitat exists for burrowing owls and nesting birds. Surveys required. The project site is located within Western Riverside MSHCP designated survey area for both burrowing owl and narrow endemic plants.
➢ Recommendation: Conduct focused surveys for burrowing owls and narrow endemic plants; perform nesting bird clearance surveys before construction.

Hydrology/Flood Zones
➢ Summary: Project area lies in two watersheds and is in FEMA Zone X (minimal flood hazard). ➢ Recommendation: No flood mitigation needed but confirm drainage design aligns with watershed boundaries.

Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands
• Summary: One drainage feature located at the southeast corner of 1st Street and Beaumont Avenue may be state or federally jurisdictional.
➢ Recommendation: Conduct a formal Jurisdictional Delineation to determine permitting needs.

Land Use/Zoning
➢ Summary: Area zoned for commercial and industrial use with transit -oriented development (TOD) overlay. ➢ Recommendation: Ensure project design complies with zoning and TOD overlay requirements.

Paleontological Resources
➢ Summary: Some areas have high sensitivity for paleontological resources. ➢ Recommendation: Include mitigation measures in CEQA to address potential discoveries during excavation.

Page 1169 of 1893 ends

MNS
1' Street Widening Feasibility Study I 10
CEQA
➢ Summary: An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) is likely appropriate. ➢ Recommendation: Prepare IS/MND covering all CEQA checklist topics with mitigation for identified impacts.

Technical Studies
➢ Summary: Habitat assessment and jurisdictional delineation are required. ➢ Recommendation: Complete these studies early to inform permitting and mitigation planning.

Plant/Wildlife Surveys
➢ Summary: Surveys for burrowing owls, narrow endemic plants, and nesting birds are required. ➢ Recommendation: Schedule surveys according to seasonal windows and regulatory timelines.

Regulatory Permitting
➢ Summary: Based on the drainage features identified through field investigations at the southeast corner of 1St Street and Beaumont Avenue, those features are expected to be considered state jurisdictional waters subject to Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code and Porter Cologne Act. The drainages may also be considered federal jurisdictional waters subject to Section 401 and/or 404 of the Clean Water Act, depending on the type of streambed (ephemeral streambeds are not federally jurisdictional) and downstream connection to other waterbodies. If the formal Jurisdictional Delineation determines that any of the regulatory permits described are required for the project, the future phase of the project would be required to prepare the following permit application and materials (as required) for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and CDFW for submittal. ➢ Recommendation: Initiate coordination with USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW early in the process.

DBESP (Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation) ➢ Summary: Required if burrowing owls are found on -site. ➢ Recommendation: Prepare DBESP if needed and submit to RCA, CDFW, and USFWS for approval.

It is expected that an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) would be the appropriate level of CEQA documentation and that mitigation measures would be required for the project. Issues that would be analyzed in the IS/MND would include:
➢ Aesthetics
➢ Agricultural and Forestry Resources
➢ Air Quality
➢ Biological Resources
➢ Cultural Resources
D. Energy
➢ Geology/Soils
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Hazards/Hazardous Materials
➢ Hydrology/Water Quality
➢ Land Use/Planning
➢ Mineral Resources
➢ Noise
➢ Population/Housing
➢ Public Services
➢ Recreation
➢ Transportation/Traffic
➢ Utility/Service Systems
➢ Wildfire

Page 1170 of 1893 ends

MNS
Section 4. Funding
1' Street Widening Feasibility Study I 11

4.1. Funding Analysis
Introduction
Our team has prepared a funding analysis that describes the various funding sources and financing mechanisms that can be assembled into a comprehensive funding plan for the 1st Street Widening Project. The funding analysis identifies specific grant programs which align with the scope of project and evaluates threshold requirements for eligibility and preparedness. Threshold requirements and pre -application conditions will include funding match, demographic status, economic status, and environmental documentation status requirements. The availability and amounts of funding will conform to the needs of the project addressed in this Feasibility Study. Once the grants are identified and the analysis is complete, the City will decide when to submit an application.

Our team has also considered Beaumont's status to pursue grants. This includes details and characteristics specific to the City of Beaumont that could influence the City's eligibility and competitiveness for certain grant programs. These details are outlined below:

Location: northwestern Riverside County, in the Inland Empire region of Southern California Incorporated: November 18, 1912
Population size: 58,463 (2023, US Census Bureau)'
Population Growth: 37.3% since 2010 (US Census Bureau)
Race & Hispanic Origin: 46% Hispanic or Latino, 48% White, 8% Asian, 16% two or more races, 9% Black or African American
Income & Poverty: $102,469 median household income, 8% persons in poverty Disadvantaged Communities (DACs): Within the City, two census block groups are considered disadvantaged (GEOID: 06065044000 and 060650439001)2
CalEnviroScreen 4.0: Overall percentile for census tracts within the City range from 41%-85%3 Analysis and Recommendation
Our team analyzed and identified potential funding opportunities in accordance with their alignment with key project features, focusing on project type and funding status. Table A-1 provides details of the identified grant programs discussed in this analysis.

As part of this funding analysis, our team did not investigate Federal grant programs funded by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), which is expiring and no longer a viable option. Future Federal transportation funding will depend on the enactment of the federal budget for the Federal fiscal year 2025-2026, which is indeterminable at this time.

Our team analyzed the following state grant programs (some of which also depend on Federal funds): Sustainable Transportation Planning (STP), Active Transportation Program (ATP), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), Solutions for Congested Corridors Program (SCCP) and Local Partnership Program (LPP). Most grants, including STP, ATP, HSIP and SCCP, aim to reduce reliance on personal vehicles, enhance transit systems, improve active transportation facilities or encourage carpooling, not improve conditions for vehicles. Although bike lanes and sidewalks are included in this project, the addition of travel lanes is not an eligible cost under STP, ATP, HSIP and SCCP. Therefore, our team recommends the City pursue the Local Partnership Program, which is funded through Senate Bill 1 (SB 1). It is important to note that LPP has a particularly high local match requirement of 50 percent. The SB 1 LPP operates on a biennial schedule, with the next call for projects expected in August 2026.

LPP funds can be used for the construction phase only. It is also important to note that LPP will evaluate and prioritize projects with a high state of readiness. Therefore, our team recommends that the City have at least 65% design plans ready at the time of 1 https://www.census.gov/c uickfacts/fact/table/beaumontcitycalifornia/PST120224 2 https://gis.water.ca.cov/app/dacs/
3 https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/11 d2f52282a54ceebcac7428e6184203/page/CalEnviroScreen-4 0/

Page 1171 of 1893 ends

MNS
1' Street Widening Feasibility Study I 12
application to the LPP in November 2026, with 100% design plans anticipated to be completed by the time the California Transportation Commission (CTC) approves the program of projects approximately six months following. This ensures that a subsequent allocation request to the CTC for LPP funds can coincide with the City's readiness to advertise for construction bids.

Our team examined funding opportunities at the regional level. Specifically, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) has offered funding through the Regional Arterials Call for Projects. Funding consists of local Measure A Western Riverside County Regional Arterial and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Regional Arterial funds. Transportation projects eligible for this Call for Projects generally include construction activities for arterial capacity enhancement and improvements, signal synchronization, freeway interchanges, and grade separations. Approved projects are expected to be ready to be constructed within two years. Up to 20 percent of the available funding may be approved for the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) phase. A full allotment of points in the application scoring is given for a local match of 50 percent or greater.

This grant was last offered in 2023; however, this program is not regularly periodic. Our team monitors RCTC funding activities and will inform the City in a timely manner of the availability of this or similar funding.

Our team recommends that the City considers complementing grant funding with an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). EIFDs are a mechanism for local governments in California to finance infrastructure projects using future property tax increment, without increasing current property taxes. They do this by designating a specific set of parcels as the boundaries of the district and capturing the growth in property tax revenue within that area to fund infrastructure projects. The future commercial and industrial developments that will surround the 1St Street Widening project, as well as any other developable parcels in the city, provide an opportunity to develop a substantial capital resource which can be combined with grant funding such as LPP. The EIFD concept can not only serve to raise substantial capital but also serve as local match funding for a grant such as LPP.

State and Regional Grant Program Details Table
Grant Information
State Grants
Regional Grants
SB 1 Local Partnership Program
(LPP)
Regional Arterials Call for Projects
Funding Agency
California Transportation Commission
(CTC)
Riverside County Transportation
Commission (RCTC)
Minimum/Maximum
Grant
None
Max 10% of available funding
Local Match
50%
0%-50%
Eligibility Constraints
Must have voter approved
transportation tax or fee
Construction -ready priority
NOFO Release Date
(P) = Projected
August 2026 (P)
TBD
Application Due Date
(P) = Projected
November 2026 (P)
TBD

Page 1172 of 1893 ends

�> MNS
Section 5. Cost Estimate
1' Street Widening Feasibility Study I 13

5.1. Environmental Clearance and Design (PS&E)
Our team has prepared a design fee that would take this feasibility study into the next phases of obtaining environmental clearance and final design PS&E approval. Below is a table of key tasks and costs for the next phase. See Attachment G — Fee Estimate.

Project Management
Meetings, Schedule, Contract
$50,000
Preliminary Design
(30% Concept Approval)
Alternative Screening and Selection
$50,000
Environmental Clearance (CEQA)
Technical Studies, Environmental Document
$60,000
Utility Coordination and Relocations
Utility Letters, Utility Relocation Coordination
$15,000
Drainage Analysis and Reports
Hydraulics and Hydrology Analysis, Drainage Report
$30,000
Geotechnical Analysis and Reports
Geotech Explorations and Report
$30,000
Right of Way Coordination
Right of Way Requirement Maps
$25,000
60% PS&E
Plans, Specifications and Estimate
$290,000
95% PS&E
Plans, Specifications and Estimate
$80,000
100% PS&E
Plans, Specifications and Estimate
$55,000
RE File & Bid Support
As-Builts
$15,000
TOTAL*
$700,000

5.2. Preliminary Engineers Estimate
Our team has prepared a preliminary engineers estimate for the project. Below is a table of the key cost elements for the estimate.

See Attachment H — Construction Cost Estimate.

Roadway
Roadway Ex, Pavement, Concrete, C&G, Sidewalk, Curb Ramps $1,698,300
Traffic
Signing and Striping, Signal Mods, Electrical/Lighting
$745,000
Temporary Traffic Control
Temporary barriers, signage
Drainage
Pipe, Catch Basins, Overside Drains, BMP's
$562,500
Landscaping
Hardscaping, Planting
$100,000
Miscellaneous
Relocation of fences, gates, removals, and minor items
$155,500
Mobilization
10%
$326,400
Contingency
25%
$897,500
TOTAL*
$4,487,500
* Note: Total Fee does not include Right of Way Acquisitions or Appraisals. Engineers estimate does not include support costs, these costs can be determined during the next phase of the project. Depending on the project schedule and timeline of when the City will plan to construct the project, escalation will need to be factored into the price shown in this estimate.

Page 1173 of 1893 ends

MNS
Section 6. Summary

6.1. Recommendation
1' Street Widening Feasibility Study I 14
Based on the findings of this feasibility study, the following recommendations are provided to guide the City of Beaumont through the next phases of the 1st Street Widening Project:

1. Advance to Environmental Phase
Initiate the environmental clearance process under CEQA with the preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). This should be supported by technical studies including biological assessments, jurisdictional delineation, traffic analysis, and geotechnical investigations.

2. Conduct Required Surveys and Permittinc
Perform focused surveys for burrowing owls, narrow endemic plants, and nesting birds, critical to obtain seasonal surveys as soon as possible. Begin coordination with regulatory agencies (USACE, RWQCB, CDFW) to determine permitting needs for the drainage feature at the southeast corner of 1st Street and Beaumont Avenue.

3. Refine Preliminary Desicn
Continue development of the geometric design, including widening limits, driveway tie-ins, curb ramps, and signal modifications. Evaluate the feasibility of Class IV bike lanes to meet the City's multimodal transportation goals.

4. Initiate Right -of -Way Planning
Prepare detailed right-of-way maps and begin early coordination for acquisition and appraisal of impacted parcels.

Consider design refinements to minimize property impacts where feasible.

5. Coordinate with Utility Providers
Maintain ongoing communication with utility companies, especially Southern California Edison, to plan for relocations.

Begin potholing and mapping of utility lines in the next phase to avoid construction delays.

6. Pursue Fundinc Opportunities
Prepare for the SB 1 Local Partnership Program (LPP) application by targeting 65% design completion by late 2026.

Explore Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) formation to support local match requirements and long-term capital planning.

7. On-Goinq Updates to Cost Estimates and Schedule
Refine the preliminary cost estimate to include right-of-way acquisition, support costs, and escalation factors. Develop a detailed project schedule that aligns environmental, design, permitting, and funding milestones.

By following these recommendations, the City will be well -positioned to advance the 1st Street Widening Project through environmental clearance, final design, and ultimately to construction, ensuring the corridor meets future mobility, safety, and community development needs.

Page 1174 of 1893 ends

1' Street Widening Feasibility Study I 15

6.2. Next Steps
Based on our feasibility study findings below is a list of recommendations/next steps for the future environmental and final design phases.

Traffic Analysis — A traffic study will need to be prepared as part of the environmental phase of the project to evaluate addition of lanes and asses turn pocket needs and lengths. This was not included as part of this study.

Environmental — An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration is the level of environmental report that is likely for the project.

Next steps will be to perform environmental technical studies to support the level of environmental document. The preliminary design concept in this study will facilitate the establishment of a project environmental footprint.

Design — The geometric concept prepared for this study will continue to be revised and detailed as part of the next phases.

Widening limits, driveway tie-ins, proposed grading, curb ramp design, signal design, drainage design will all be looked at in the environmental phase and detailed in the final design phase.

Geotechnical — This study did not include a geotechnical analysis aside from a desktop review of the existing pavement conditions of 1st Street. As part of the future phases, geotechnical analysis will include pavement recommendations, a geotechnical report, and geotechnical explorations (if needed).

Right of Way — As part of this study, the existing right of way limits were established along 1St Street, and approximate right of way takes were calculated. During the environmental phase, right of way maps will be prepared and right of way takes will be further detailed and established. In the final design phase right of way coordination, acquisition and appraisals will be completed.

Utilities — As part of this phase utility as-builts were collected from owners within the vicinity of the project. On -going coordination will continue in the environmental and design phase of the project.

Schedule - The critical path items related to schedule for the environmental phase will be the traffic analysis and potential mitigation for Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), and coordinating with resource agencies on the potential mitigation needed for the drainage feature crossings and need for permits. During the final design phase utilities and right of way will be the critical path items that will need to start as early as possible.

Page 1175 of 1893 ends

MNS
1' Street Widening Feasibility Study I 16
Section 7. Attachments
A. Vicinity Map
B. Layout Plan Exhibit
C. Environmental Constraints Memorandum
D. Drainage Exhibits
E. Utility As-Builts
F. Right of Way Impacts Exhibit
G. Fee Estimate — Environmental and Final Design
H. Construction Cost Estimate

Page 1176 of 1893 ends

ATTACHMENT A

Page 1177 of 1893 ends

PROJECT VICINITY MAP

Page 1178 of 1893 ends

ATTACHMENT B

Page 1179 of 1893 ends

ViNE Exhibit 1a. Layout Plan
I
z
LEGEND
0 / 'J
i
O
o0

PAVEMENT WIDENING

SIDEWALK

LANDSCAPE

FIBER LINES

GAS LINES
24" RCP CROSSINGS

SCE OH LINES

POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
o �\
f

ABBREVIATIONS

EP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT

SW - SIDEWALK

BL - BIKE LANE

ETW - EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY

CL - CENTERLINE

FL - FLOWLINE

R/W - RIGHT OF WAY

RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

L S - LANDSCAPE
APN 418-270-042
u
;er
O
o O
--- ---.----- T -- ---
3+00
•
CL
4+00
APN 418-270-039
5+00
APN 418-270-032
•

ROADSIDE DITCH FLOWLINE

TO BE GRADED TO CONVEY

FLOW TO THE EXISTING
CROSS CULVERTS. DETAILS

ANALYSIS AND SIZING TO BE

STUDIING IN THE NEXT
PHASE.

APN 418-270-040
-01
APN 418-270-031
6+00
.0
7+30
8+00
1ST ST

ROADSIDE DITCH FLOWLINE

TO BE GRADED TO CONVEY

FLOW TO THE EXISTING
CROSS CULVERTS. DETAILS

ANALYSIS AND SIZING TO BE

STUDIING IN THE NEXT
PHASE.
r\ �%
APN 418-260-024
� E
SW

LANDSCAPE
2595
APN 418-260-023
//
O
9+00
.0
10+00
i
i
IL
n
•
/ 1-1 inAmow„
EXISTING 24" RCP

EXTENSION
NEEDED. TO BE

DESIGNED IN THE
NEXT PHASE.

APN 418-310-007
51 '

EXISTING STREET

LIGHTING TO BE

RELOCATED TO NEW

SIDEWALK(TYPICAL)
6'
ETW
39'
ETW
13'
ETW
ETW
13'
6'

TWIT TL
DIKE
3I
KE
SW

EP LANDSCAPE
Exist
R/W

EXISTING SCE

DISTRIBUTION
POLES. POLES AND

LINES TO BE

RELOCATED BY

OTHERS (TYPICAL)
-p
k
/
100'

PLAN VIEW
SCALE: 1'=50' N
GR
SIBLF
APN 418-320-011/418-320-012
R/W
90'
Exist
R/W
FL
12'
76'
FL
12'
6'
ETW
6 12'
12'

ETW ETW
1 2'! 4' 12'
12' ETW6,
6'
6'
LS
SW
3L
BL
SW
LS
C &G
C&G
R/W
0 4+00
CL
c
14+00
•
0 10
y
N
0 O
16+00

4.10 0
17+00
0 EP
SW

LANDSCAPE
APN 418-320-007
1 00'
EXISTING TWO 24" RCP
EXTENSION NEEDED.

TO BE DESIGNED IN
THE NEXT PHASE.

R/W
Exist
R/W
12'
80'
FL
76'
Exist
R/W
FLH
12'
6'
6'
ETW
6'
12'
12'
ETW
1 ETW
12'
12'
ETW
6'
6'
6'
LS
SW
3L
3L
SW
LS
C&G
C&G
Existing Cross Section
Proposed Section A -A
Proposed Section B -B

Page 1180 of 1893 ends

IViNS Exhibit lb. Layout Plan
LEGEND

PAVEMENT WIDENING

SIDEWALK

LANDSCAPE

FIBER LINES

GAS LINES
24" RCP CROSSINGS

SCE OH LINES
APN 418-260-013

ABBREVIATIONS

EP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT

SW - SIDEWALK

BL - BIKE LANE

ETW - EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY

CL - CENTERLINE

FL - FLOWLINE

R/W - RIGHT OF WAY

RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

L S - LANDSCAPE

EXISTING SCE

DISTRIBUTION
POLES. POLES AND

LINES TO BE

RELOCATED BY

OTHERS (TYPICAL)

ROADSIDE DITCH FLOWLINE

TO BE GRADED TO CONVEY

FLOW TO THE EXISTING
CROSS CULVERTS. DETAILS

ANALYSIS AND SIZING TO BE

STUDIING IN THE NEXT
PHASE.

APN 418-260-014
APN 418-250-007
EP
SW

LANDSCAPE
APN 418-250-010
40 N
�+9
CL
40 15+00
19+00
20+00
•
21+00
22+00
23+00
24+00
25+00
4 O
In
N
M
APN 418-330-023
APN 418-330-022
•

LANDSCAPE
APN 418-330-020
R/W
EP
sw
C\
APN 418-330-017
I//
100'
26 ()

VXISTING STREET

LIGHTING TO BE

RELOCATED TO NEW

SIDEWALK(TYPICAL)
J
APN 418-330-018
R/W
Exist
R/W
80'
Exist
R/W
FL
12'
76'
FL
12'
6'
6'
ETW
8 12'
1 2' ETW 1 ETW 12'
1 ETW
2' 8,
6'
6'
LS
SW
3L
3L
SW
LS
C&G
Proposed Section C -C
C&G
1ST,IST E' 4 _
• o r ._. .
26✓
/ /
—
40 28+00
29+00
30+00
APN 418-341-007

PLAN VIEW
SCALE: 1'=50' N
C
Co
z
R/W
EXISTING THREE 24" RCP
EXTENSION NEEDED. TO

BE DESIGNED IN THE
NEXT PHASE.

EXISTING SIGNAL

POLE RELOCATION

REQUIRED
32+00
A
0 _
4)
VAlASNN3d
D
D
c
•
•
•
w
•Z
w
a•
O
In

NOT V SIBLE
O
O
Co
a_
100'
APN 418-341-009
R/W
Exist
R/W
r�L
12'
80'
Exist
/1/\/
76'
12'
6'
6'
6,ETW 12'

ETW ETW
12' 4' ! 1 2'
12'
1 ETW
2' ,
6'
6'
LS
SW
EL
3L
SW
LS
C&G
Proposed Section D -D
C&G
0 0

Page 1181 of 1893 ends

MNB Exhibit 2a. Layout Plan - Buffered Bike Lane Variation LEGEND

PAVEMENT WIDENING

SIDEWALK

LANDSCAPE

FIBER LINES

GAS LINES
24" RCP CROSSINGS

SCE OH LINES

POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
EXISTING 24" RCP

EXTENSION
NEEDED. TO BE

DESIGNED IN THE
NEXT PHASE.

ABBREVIATIONS

EP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT

SW - SIDEWALK

BL - BIKE LANE

ETW - EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY

CL - CENTERLINE

FL - FLOWLINE

R/W - RIGHT OF WAY

RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

L S - LANDSCAPE
APN 418-270-042
APN 418-310-007
1 3' ETW ETW
1 Existing Cross Section
APN 418-270-039

EXISTING STREET

LIGHTING TO BE

RELOCATED TO NEW

SIDEWALK(TYPICAL)
Exist
R/W
SW

LANDSCAPE
APN 418-270-032

ROADSIDE DITCH FLOWLINE

TO BE GRADED TO CONVEY

FLOW TO THE EXISTING
CROSS CULVERTS. DETAILS

ANALYSIS AND SIZING TO BE

STUDIING IN THE NEXT
PHASE.

EXISTING SCE

DISTRIBUTION
POLES. POLES AND

LINES TO BE

RELOCATED BY

OTHERS (TYPICAL)
APN 418-270-040
1ST SIRE T
Proposed Section A -A
10+00
Exist
R/W
APN 418-270-031

11.00 APN 418-320-011/418-320-012
Exist
R/W

ROADSIDE DITCH FLOWLINE

TO BE GRADED TO CONVEY

FLOW TO THE EXISTING
CROSS CULVERTS. DETAILS

ANALYSIS AND SIZING TO BE

STUDIING IN THE NEXT
PHASE.

LANDSCAPE
APN 418-320-007
Proposed Section B -B
APN 418-260-023
16+00
EXISTING TWO 24" RCP
EXTENSION NEEDED.

TO BE DESIGNED IN
THE NEXT PHASE.

Exist
R/W

Page 1182 of 1893 ends

MNB Exhibit 2b. Layout Plan - Buffered Bike Lane Variation LEGEND

PAVEMENT WIDENING

SIDEWALK

LANDSCAPE

FIBER LINES

GAS LINES
26' RCP CROSSINGS

SCE OH LINES
APN 418-260-013

ABBREVIATIONS

EP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT

SW - SIDEWALK

BL - BIKE LANE

ETW - EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY

CL - CENTERLINE

FL - FLOWLINE

R/W - RIGHT OF WAY

RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE

L S - LANDSCAPE
7 EXISTING SCE

DISTRIBUTION
POLES. POLES AND

LINES TO BE

RELOCATED BY

OTHERS (TYPICAL)

ROADSIDE DITCH FLOWLINE

TO BE GRADED TO CONVEY

FLOW TO THE EXISTING
CROSS CULVERTS. DETAILS

ANALYSIS AND SIZING TO BE

STUDIING IN THE NEXT
PHASE.

APN 418-260-014
APN 418-250-007
EP
SW ,,! „T „��, �

LANDSCAPE
APN 418-250-010
EXISTING THREE 24" RCP
EXTENSION NEEDED. TO

BE DESIGNED IN THE
NEXT PHASE.

EXISTING SIGNAL

POLE RELOCATION

REQUIRED
D
N
-04
z
z
cf.)
D
w
c wz
D
•
CL
w
18+00
• CV
IG
19+00 20+00 21+00
22+00
23+00
24+00
1S STREET_
. . . ®®._
25+00
--
N
4 APN 418-330-023
APN 418-330-022
.
r

LANDSCAPE
APN 418-330-020
3/W
EP
SW
APN 418-330-017
//
100'
2610
t
. .t,
200
N
27i OE
28 "1
E00
29+00
30+00
31+00
N
M
/EXISTING STREET

LIGHTING TO BE

RELOCATED TO NEW

SIDEWALK(TYPICAL)
APN 418-330-018
R/W
Exist
R/W
80'
Exist
R/W
FL
12'
76'
FL
12'
6'
6'
6' 2TW
12'
1 2' ETW 1 ETW 12'
ET
12' 2' 6'
6'
6'
LS
SW
3L
3 U
F
F
E
R
3 3L
U
F
F
E
3 SW
LS
C&G
Proposed Section C -C
C&G
T
U
7 /
/
/
/
/
APN 418-341-007
TT*

PLAN VIEW
SCALE: 1'=50' N
3/1/V
C
06 z
0 iE
32+00
33+t:

O
APN 418-341-030
1 00'
APN 418-341-009
3/W
Exist
R/W
r�L
12'
80'
Exist
3/W
76'
FLI
12'
6'
6'
5' 2TW
12'
ETWETW!
1 3' 2 1
12'
12' ET 2' 5'
6'
6'
LS
SW
3L
3 U
F
F
E
3 3 3L
U
F
F
E
R
SW
LS
C&G
Proposed Section D -D
C&G
a
+00
J
z
a 0
Y w
as
0

Page 1183 of 1893 ends

ATTACHMENT C

Page 1184 of 1893 ends

Environmental Constraints Analysis
1st Street Widening Project
City of Beaumont, Riverside County, California
Prepared For:

City of Beaumont
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, California 92223
Contact: Dustin Christensen, P.E.

Principal Engineer
PREPARED BY:

MNS Engineers, Inc.

Renee Gleason
Senior Planner
3850 Vine Street, Suite 110
Riverside, CA 92507
January 2025

Page 1185 of 1893 ends

MNS

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Page 1186 of 1893 ends

MNB
Table of Contents
1 Introduction 1

1.1 Project Site Description and Location 1

1.2 Methodology 1
2 Results and Discussion 2

2.1 Agricultural Resources 2

2.2 Biological Resources 2

2.2.1 Existing Conditions 2

2.2.2 Special -Status Vegetation Communities 2

2.2.3 Special -Status Species 2

2.2.4 Nesting Birds/Avian Species 3

2.2.5 Critical Habitat 3

2.2.6 Western Riverside County MSHCP Compliance 3

2.3 Hydrology/Flood Zones 3

2.4 Jurisdictional Waters (State and Federal) and Wetlands 3

2.5 Land Use/Zoning 4

2.6 Paleontological Resources 4
3 Anticipated Environmental Compliance Approach 4

3.1 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 4

3.1.1 Draft and Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration including Noticing 4

3.2 Technical Studies 5

3.2.1 Habitat Assessment and Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Analysis 5

3.2.2 Jurisdictional Delineation 5

3.3 Plant/Wildlife Surveys 5

3.3.1 Burrowing Owl Focused Surveys and Pre -Construction Surveys 5 PAGE I i Page 1187 of 1893

MNB

3.3.2 Narrow Endemic Plant Survey 6

3.3.3 Pre -Construction Nesting Bird Clearance Surveys 6 3,4 Regulatory Permitting 6

3.4.1 Section 404 Nationwide Permit 6

3.4.2 Section 401 Water Quality Certification or Waste Discharge Requirement 6

3.4.3 Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement 7

3.4.4 Permit Tracking and Resource Agency Coordination 8

3.5 Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation 8 4 References 9
List of Attachments
Attachment I: Site Photographs
Attachment I I : Literature Review Results
Attachment I I I : USFWS National Wetlands Inventory
PAGE
iii Page 1188 of 1893

MNB
Acronyms and Abbreviations
APN assessor's parcel number
BMP best management practice
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFGC California Fish and Game Code
CIRP Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
CNPS California Native Plant Society
DOC California Department of Conservation
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FESA Federal Endangered Species Act
GIS Geographic Information System
I-10 Interstate 10
IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation Project Planning Tool MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
MSHCP Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
Project 1ST Street Widening Project
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
SR -79 State Route 79
SSC Species of Special Concern
USAGE United States Army Corps of Engineers
USDA United States Department of Agriculture
USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service
USGS United States Geological Survey
WL Watch List
WotS waters of the State
WotUS waters of the US
PAGE
ti

Page 1189 of 1893 ends

C MNS
1 Introduction

CITY OF BEAUMONT
1ST STREET WIDENING PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS
This report contains the findings of MNS Engineers, Inc.'s (MNS) Environmental Constraints Analysis for the proposed 1st Street Widening Project (project or project site) located in the City of Beaumont, in western Riverside County, California. The purpose of this analysis is to inform the City of the potential environmental constraints associated with the project from a permitting and resource impact standpoint. This memorandum is intended to be supplemental to the engineering report prepared by MNS' engineers.

1.1 Project Site Description and Location
The proposed project is located the central portion of the City of Beaumont in western Riverside County.

The project site is located south of Interstate 10 (I-10), east of Beaumont Avenue, north of Potrero Boulevard, and west of Pennsylvania Avenue. The project proposes widening an approximately 0.62 -mile segment of 1st Street between Beaumont Avenue and Pennsylvania Avenue from 2 to 4 lanes.

Existing surrounding uses in the project area north of 1st Street include single-family residential and commercial uses including a gas station, RV storage facility, and a pavement marking company. Existing surrounding uses to the south of 1st Street include vacant/open space and scattered single-family residential units.

1.2 Methodology
To identify the general environmental constraints associated with implementation of the project, MNS' environmental specialists reviewed existing published sources such as the City of Beaumont General Plan and zoning for the project area, available GIS data from the County of Riverside, as well as available data and aerial mapping. In addition, the potential for special -status species' known to occur and/or having the potential to occur in the study area was evaluated using data from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), and the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) database.

MNS Senior biologist Mello Dee Hrdlicka inventoried and evaluated the extent and conditions of the vegetation communities found withing the boundaries of the survey area and confirmed existing conditions within the survey area on January 28, 2025. MNS biologist did encounter some access restrictions and where access was not available, either due to private residences or fencing, a visual assessment was done with binoculars where appropriate. Refer to Table 1 below for a summary of the survey date, timing, surveyors, and weather conditions.

Table 1: Survey Date, Time, Surveyor, Temperature and Wind Date
Time
(Start/Finish)
Surveyor
Temperature
Wind Speed mph
(Start/Finish)
January 28, 2025
8:55/12:02
Mello Dee Hrdlicka
41 partly cloudy/47
partly cloudy
3-7
As used in this report, "special -status" refers to species that are either federally -/State -listed, proposed, or candidates; plant species that have been designated a California Rare Plant Rank by the California Native Plant Society; wildlife species that are designated by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife as Fully Protected, Species of Special Concern, or Watch List; or State/locally rare vegetation communities.

PAGE I 1 Page 1190 of 1893

C MNS
2 Results and Discussion

CITY OF BEAUMONT
1ST STREET WIDENING PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS

2..1 Agricultural Resources
Based on the California Department of Conservation (DOC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, California Important Farmland Finder, the lands north of 1st Street within the project boundaries are designated as "Urban and Built -Up Land" and "Farmlands of Local Importance." The lands to the south of 1St Street within the project boundaries are designated as "Other Land" and "Farmlands of Local Importance." The project site is not under a Williamson Act contract and there is no active farming on the property. A site - specific analysis of potential past use of adjacent farmlands will be required in the project -specific CEQA analysis.

2.2 Biological Resources

2.2.1 Existing Conditions
Based on the Riverside County GIS database, vegetation in the project area consists of agricultural land and developed/disturbed land uses. In addition, there are no blue -line streams identified within or adjacent to the project area.

2.2.2 Special -Status Vegetation Communities
The CNDDB literature review identified one special -status vegetation community as occurring within the USGS Beaumont, California 7.5 -minute quadrangle: Southern Cottonwood Willow Riparian Forest (refer to Attachment II). No natural vegetation communities, including Southern Cottonwood Willow Riparian Forest, were identified within the project site and a 50 -foot buffer. The land cover types were limited to disturbed and developed. One drainage is located along the southeast corner of 1st Street and Beaumont Avenue, but the vegetation is limited to non-native herbaceous cover.

2.2.3 Special -Status Species
The CNDDB and CNPS literature review identified sixty-six (66) special -status plant species and twenty (20) special -status wildlife species as occurring within the USGS Beaumont, California 7.5 -minute quadrangle (refer to Attachment II).

The open space located throughout the project site was disturbed with no natural habitat communities present. Vegetation communities were mapped and included disturbed and developed land covers and one drainage feature located along the southeast corner of 1St Street and Beaumont Avenue. The open space areas and vacant lots throughout the project site are disturbed due to routine weed abatement activities, as such, natural communities are not present. There are several stands of River redgum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) throughout the project site, and along with ornamental habitat provided by the residential homes scattered throughout the area, there is suitable nesting bird habitat. One raptor nest was noted, with two Red-tailed hawks, in a stand of river redgum just north of 1st Street at the east end of the project site.

Pre -construction nesting bird surveys would be required within three days prior to the start of construction/ground disturbing activities.

No special -status plant species were observed during the field survey. The open spaces throughout the project site are routinely disturbed during weed abatement activities (i.e., disking, tilling), as such, natural communities are not present. However, based on the project site's location within the Western Riverside MSHCP designated survey area for narrow endemic plants (Marvin's onion, Many -stemmed dudleya), a narrow endemic plant survey will be required to satisfy the requirements of the MSHCP.

PAGE I 2 Page 1191 of 1893

C MNS

CITY OF BEAUMONT
1ST STREET WIDENING PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS
No special -status wildlife species were observed during the field survey. However, the project site does provide suitable habitat for burrowing owl in the open spaces throughout the site. The project site is also located within a Western Riverside MSHCP designated survey area for burrowing owl, burrowing owl protocol surveys will be required to satisfy the requirements of the MSHCP. A list of plant and wildlife species observed is provided in Attachment III of this report.

2.2.4 Nesting Birds/Avian Species
Potential nesting habitat for raptors and other protected avian species is present within or immediately adjacent to the project site. Individual trees may provide nesting habitat for raptor species, special -status avian species, and other avian species protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 and Fish and Game Code. Mitigation measures consistent with CDFW recommendations are typically provided during the CEQA process if the project has the potential to impact the species, as discussed in Section 3 below.

2.2.5 Critical Habitat
Under the definition used by the federal Endangered Species Act (FESA), designated "Critical Habitat" refers to specific areas within the geographical range of a species that were occupied at the time it was listed that contain the physical or biological features that are essential to the survival and eventual recovery of that species and that may require special management considerations or protection, regardless of whether the species is still extant in the area. According to the USFWS Threatened and Endangered Species Active Critical Habitat mapper, the project site and area are not located within designated Critical Habitat for any federally listed species.

2.2..6 Western Riverside County MSHCP Compliance
Based on the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) MSHCP information map, the project site and vicinity are not located within a criteria cell. In addition, the project site and vicinity are not located in an area identified as "conserved lands." The project site is located within a Western Riverside MSHCP designated survey area for both burrowing owl and narrow endemic plants (Marvin's onion, Many -stemmed dudleya). The project site and vicinity are not located with a Western Riverside MSHCP survey area for amphibians, small mammals, or invertebrate species. As such, MNS recommends that the baseline biological assessment recommended above include the results of a narrow endemic plant survey conducted by a qualified/permitted biologist if suitable habitat occurs within the project disturbance footprint.

2.3 Hydrology/Flood Zones
Based on the Riverside County GIS database, the project limits traverse the boundaries of two watersheds; the western portion of the roadway alignment falls within the Santa Ana River watershed and the eastern portion of the roadway alignment falls within the San Jacinto Valley watershed.

Based on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Map Service Center, Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) No. 06065C0811 G and No. 06065OO812G (both effective August 28, 2008), the project limits are within an area designated by FEMA as Zone X (areas of minimal flood hazard) and are not located within a flood hazard area.

2.4 Jurisdictional Waters (State and Federal) and Wetlands According to the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory, no wetlands, inland bodies of water (Le., ponds, lakes), or riverine resources occur within or adjacent to the project site (refer to Attachment III of this report).

During the field investigation, there were several culverts noted along 1st Street that divert water from the roads to the adjacent open fields. One culvert located along the southeast corner of 1St Street and Beaumont PAGE I 3 Page 1192 of 1893

C MNS

CITY OF BEAUMONT
1ST STREET WIDENING PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS
Avenue had standing water and was connected to a v -ditch providing drainage to the culvert. Within this small drainage feature occurred Baltic rush (Juncus balticus), Prairie sunflower (Helianthus petiolaris), Dove weed (Croton setiger) and maltese star -thistle (Centaurea melitensis). These features are expected to be considered state jurisdictional waters subject to Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code and Porter Cologne Act. The drainages may also be considered federal jurisdictional waters subject to Section 401 and/or 404 of the Clean Water Act depending on the type of streambed (ephemeral streambeds are not federally jurisdictional) and downstream connection to other waterbodies. A formal Jurisdictional Delineation is recommended if the proposed project will result in temporary access or construction or permanent structures within these drainages.

2.5 Land Use/Zoning
Based on the City's Land Use Map, the two land use designations occurring within the project vicinity are General Commercial and Industrial, with a TOD (transit -oriented development) overlay occurring south of 1st Street. Based on the City's Zoning Map, the two zoning designations occurring within the project vicinity are Community Commercial and Manufacturing, with a TOD overlay to the south and east of 1st Street.

2.6 Paleontological Resources
According to the Riverside County GIS database, the majority of the project area is designated as "Undetermined Potential" for paleontological sensitivity. However, a small portion of the 1St Street roadway alignment traverses an area designated as "High Sensitivity" for paleontological resources. In addition, construction activities required for the proposed road widening may result in inadvertent discoveries of buried cultural and paleontological resources during ground disturbance associated with the project.

Therefore, potential impacts to paleontological resources should be evaluated and discussed in the CEQA document and mitigation measures will likely be required. 3 Anticipated Environmental Compliance Approach
Based upon our review of the project site and the Western Riverside MSHCP survey requirements, we anticipate that the following documents, technical studies, surveys, and permitting may be required for environmental compliance for the project:

3..1 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

3.1.1 Draft and Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration including Noticing The preliminary analysis included in this memorandum is intended to support early planning efforts and is not intended to represent a level of analysis that will be required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The discussion focuses on key resource areas and does not consider all topical areas of the CEQA Checklist under Appendix G.

CEQA requires that state and local government agencies consider the environmental consequences of projects over which they have discretionary authority before taking action on those projects (Public Resources Code [PRC] 21000 et seq.). Future planning and/or construction of individual projects may be undertaken and would be subject to the required CEQA compliance process. It is expected that an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) would be the appropriate level of CEQA documentation and that mitigation measures would be required for the project. Issues that would be analyzed in the IS/MND would include aesthetics, agricultural and forestry resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology/soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards/hazardous materials, hydrology/water quality, land use/planning, mineral resources, noise, population/housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, utility/service systems, and wildfire.

PAGE I 4 Page 1193 of 1893

C MNS

3.2 Technical Studies

CITY OF BEAUMONT
1ST STREET WIDENING PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS

3.2.1 Habitat Assessment and Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Analysis
A formal assessment of the project site's on -site biological resources and potential to support special -status biological resources should be conducted and will be required for approval by the RCA. The assessment should make determinations on the potential for special -status resources to occur on the project site and should provide a full, in-depth analysis of the project's compliance with the Western Riverside County MSHCP.

3.2.2 Jurisdictional Delineation
As discussed in Section 2.4, a formal Jurisdictional Delineation is recommended if the proposed project will result in temporary access or construction or permanent structures within the drainages that were identified on the project site. A site visit will be conducted that will determine the limits of state and federal jurisdictional waters and wetlands located within the boundaries of the project site. The jurisdictional delineation fieldwork will result in the following:
• Determination of the USACE' ordinary high-water mark (OHWM) and indicate the existence of any three (3) -parameter wetlands on -site. The actual presence or absence of wetlands on -site will be verified through the determination of the presence of wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils in accordance with the September 2008 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (Version 2.0); • Identification of CDFW jurisdictional areas being on -site streambed and active banks, or to the outer drip line of riparian vegetation (if present), pursuant the California Fish and Game Code; and • In cases where isolated waters, not subject to federal jurisdiction are present, the delineation will identify areas under the jurisdiction of the RWQCB pursuant to the California Porter -Cologne Water Quality Act (Porter -Cologne).

Prior to visiting the project site, a literature review will be conducted of relevant information that supports the site reconnaissance and report preparation. Sources reviewed are anticipated to include, but may not be limited to, topographic maps, soil surveys, historic and current aerial photography, flood and wetland inventory maps, hydrology/climate information, and watershed data. A thorough on -site investigation would then be conducted to identify the limits of aquatic features subject to each regulatory agency jurisdiction. A comprehensive written report will then be prepared summarizing the results of the jurisdictional delineation literature review and fieldwork, as well as identifying required regulatory permitting for the project.

3.3 Plant/Wildlife Surveys

3..3.1 Burrowing Owl Focused Surveys and Pre -Construction Surveys Based on the project site's location within a Western Riverside MSHCP designated survey area for burrowing owl, burrowing owl protocol surveys will be required on the project site to satisfy the requirements of the Western Riverside County MSHCP. If burrowing owls are identified on the project site during the surveys, the project proponent will be required to avoid the burrows and preserve 90% of suitable burrowing owl habitat with long-term conservation value on the project site or incorporate mitigation for loss of those lands into a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) report (refer to Section 3.5). This preservation requirement is not necessary if survey results are negative. Survey results and anticipated impacts to habitat with long-term conservation value, if burrowing owls are present, would be incorporated into the Habitat Assessment and Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Analysis.

PAGE I 5 Page 1194 of 1893

C MNS

CITY OF BEAUMONT
1ST STREET WIDENING PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS
It should also be noted that pre -construction burrowing owl surveys would also be required within thirty (30) days prior to ground disturbance regardless of whether focused surveys are positive or negative.

3.3.2 Narrow Endemic Plant Survey
Based on the project site's location within a Western Riverside MSHCP designated survey area for narrow endemic plants (Marvin's onion, Many -stemmed dudleya), a narrow endemic plant survey will be required on the project site to satisfy the requirements of the Western Riverside County MSHCP.

3.3.3 Pre -Construction Nesting Bird Clearance Surveys
A nesting bird survey shall be conducted within three (3) days prior to the start of construction/ground disturbing activities. In the event that active nests are discovered, a suitable buffer (distance to be determined by the biologist) shall be established around such active nests, and no construction/ground disturbing activities within the buffer allowed, until the biologist has determined that the nest(s) is no longer active (i.e., the nestlings have fledged and are no longer dependent on the nest).

3.4 Regulatory Permitting
As discussed in Section 2.4, the drainage features identified on the project site are expected to be considered state jurisdictional waters subject to Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code and Porter Cologne Act. The drainages may also be considered federal jurisdictional waters subject to Section 401 and/or 404 of the Clean Water Act, depending on the type of streambed (ephemeral streambeds are not federally jurisdictional) and downstream connection to other waterbodies. If the formal Jurisdictional Delineation (described in Section 3.2.2) determines that any of the regulatory permits described below are required for the project, MNS would prepare the following permit application and materials (as required) for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and CDFW for submittal.

3.4.1 Section 404 Nationwide Permit
A request for authorization under the Section 404 Nationwide Permit (NWP) program would be prepared for review by the City and submitted to the USACE. MNS would review all of the NWPs to determine which specific permit could apply and then recommend the NWP that provides the least restrictions and notification requirements. The request for NWP authorization generally includes:
• Detailed description of the proposed project;
• Detailed description of the jurisdictional areas to be impacted by the proposed project (this is generally accomplished by submittal of the Jurisdictional Delineation Report); • Discussion of approvals and certifications being obtained from other federal, state or local agencies; • The Streambed Alteration Notification package submitted to CDFW; • The request to the RWQCB for water quality certification; • Biological Resources Assessment (to determine whether Section 7 Endangered Species Act consultation with USFWS is required); and
• Cultural Resources report for the project (to facilitate USACE tribal consultation and to determine whether Section 106 consultation with the State Historic Preservation Office is required).

3.4.2 Section 401 Water Quality Certification or Waste Discharge Requirement Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires that any discharge of dredge or fill material into Waters of the U.S., including wetlands, not violate state water quality standards. Water quality certification must be PAGE I 6 Page 1195 of 1893

MNS

CITY OF BEAUMONT
1ST STREET WIDENING PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS
obtained as a condition of Section 404 of the CWA before USACE would issue the 404 NWP. A written request for a Section 401 Water Quality Certification would be submitted to the RWQCB. The 401 Water Quality Certification request generally includes the following items:
• A completed application form;
• A detailed project description;
• A description of project impacts;
• A description of best management practices provided by the applicant to avoid erosion and sedimentation or discharge of materials into stormwater, both during construction and long-term operation;
• A discussion of the approvals being obtained from other federal, state, and local agencies • The project CEQA document;
• The application fee assessed using the RWQCB Dredge and Fill Fee Calculator (to be assessed by MNS and provided by the City).

Under the new State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State, the RWQCB requires that a request for pre -application meeting be submitted 30 days prior to submitting the 401 application. MNS would submit the request by email and facilitate the pre -application meeting, which is typically held online via Zoom or Microsoft Teams. Pursuant to the State Permit Streamlining Act, the RWQCB has 30 days following receipt of the 401 application to deem an application complete or request additional information. Following a determination that the application is complete, the RWQCB has an additional 60 days to issue the 401 Water Quality Certification.

In the event that an AJD is issued by the USACE and the onsite waters determined to be Waters of the State only, the 401 application will be used by the RWQCB to issue a Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR).

Issuance of a WDR involves the additional step of RWQCB Board agenda item and approval.

3.4.3 Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement
MNS would prepare the Streambed Alternation Agreement (SAA) application for submittal to CDFW to request authorization for temporary and permanent impacts to Waters of the State. The SAA request generally includes the following items:
• A completed application form;
• A detailed project description;
• A description of project impacts;
• A discussion of the approvals and certifications being obtained from other federal, state and local agencies;
• The project CEQA document;
• The SAA application fee using the 2023 fee schedule (to be assessed by MNS and provided by the Applicant).

CDFW is a state agency; therefore, under the state Permit Streamlining Act, when the term of the requested agreement is 5 years or less, CDFW has 30 days following receipt of the 1602 application to deem and application complete or request additional information. Following a determination that the application is PAGE

Page 1196 of 1893 ends

C MNS

CITY OF BEAUMONT
1ST STREET WIDENING PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS
completed, CDFW has an additional 60 days to issue the draft 1602 SAA for review/signature by the Applicant.

3.4.4 Permit Tracking and Resource Agency Coordination
Regulatory permit applications would be coordinated with USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW throughout processing to ensure that any potential issues are communicated to the City and resolved at the earliest possible opportunity. Coordination may include telephone, email or written correspondence, or meetings with the agencies.

3.5 Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation As discussed in Section 3.3.1, if an occupied burrow is found in the project impact area during the preconstruction clearance survey, a burrowing owl avoidance and minimization plan and Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) analysis would need to be prepared and submitted to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), CDFW, and USFWS for approval prior to initiating project activities. The DBESP would describe the potential impacts and proposed mitigation measures to ensure the post -project functions and values are biologically equivalent or superior, and in compliance with the MSHCP, and provide an analysis to document that the proposed burrowing owl mitigation would offset impacts to burrowing owl, as set forth under the MSHCP.

PAGE I 8 Page 1197 of 1893

C MNS
4 References

CITY OF BEAUMONT
1ST STREET WIDENING PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS
California Department of Conservation (DOC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), California Important Farmland Finder. Accessed online at: DLRP Important Farmland Finder 'ca.qov) California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2025a. Biogeographic Information and Observation System, California Natural Diversity Data Base, California. Data base report on threatened, endangered, rare or otherwise sensitive species and communities for the USGS Beaumont, California 7.5 -minute quadrangle.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2025b. RareFind 5, California Natural Diversity Data Base, California. Data base report on threatened, endangered, rare or otherwise sensitive species and communities for the USGS Beaumont, California 7.5 -minute quadrangle.

California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2025. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (online edition, v8-03 0.39). Accessed online at: http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/ .

Dudek & Associates, Inc (Dudek). 2003. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Final MSHCP, Volumes I and II . Prepared for County of Riverside Transportation and Lands Management Agency. Approved June 17, 2003.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Map Service Center, Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) No. 06083C0495G (effective December 4, 2012). Accessed online at: FEMA Flood Mao Service Center Search By Address
U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025a. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) Project Planning Tool. Accessed online at: httos://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/.

U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025b. National Wetlands Inventory.

Accessed online at: https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-ma3per/ .

U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025c. Threatened and Endangered Species Active Critical Habitat Report. Accessed online at: httos://ecos.fws.qov/ecp/report/table/critical- habitat.html
Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA). 2025. Western Riverside MSHCP Information Map. Accessed online at: RCA MSHCP Information Map PAGE I 9 Page 1198 of 1893

MNE

CITY OF BEAUMONT
1ST STREET WIDENING PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS

ATTACHMENT I

Page 1199 of 1893 ends

iMNS
Environmental Due Diligence Report

SW W NW N
210 240 270 300 330 0
I- I• I• I• I• I- I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I- I• I• BRG: 282°W (T) POS: 33°55'17"N,116°57'58"W ±16ft ALT: 2583ft Photograph 1: West facing from corner of Pennsylvania Avenue and First Street on south side of 1st Street showing disturbed habitat.

W NW N NE
270 300 330 0 30 60 9
BRG: 357°N (T) POS: 33°55'17"N,116°58'0"W ±16ft ALT: 2580ft Photograph 2: Culvert on south side of 1st Street.
1

Page 1200 of 1893 ends

0 MNS
Environmental Due Diligence Report I 2

SW W I NW
10 240 270 30( 330 0 30
I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• 1• N
BRG: 303°NW (T) POS: 33°55'18"N,116°57'58"W ±16ft ALT: 2568ft Photograph 3: Disturbed sweetbush and brome habitat on north side of 1st street at Pennsylvania Avenue. 30 NE 60
I• I• I• I• I• I•
E
90 1
SE
S
120 150 180
I • I• I • I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I•
BRG: 104°E (T) POS: 33°55'18"N, 116°57'58"W ±16ft ALT: 2562ft Photograph 4: Drainage culvert at corner of 1st Street and Pennsylvania Avenue on north side of 1st Street.

Page 1201 of 1893 ends

MNS
Environmental Due Diligence Report

W NW N NE
270 300 330 0 30 60

1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.

BRG: 344°N (T) POS: 33°55'20"N,116°58'2"W ±16ft ALT: 2563ft Photograph 5: Red rivergum (eucalyptus) trees to the north of the project site showing raptor nest.

BRG: 310°NW (T) POS: 33°55'18"N,116°58'3"W ±16ft ALT: 2577ft Photograph 6: Eucalyptus grove along north side of 1st Street. 3 1st Street Widening Project

Page 1202 of 1893 ends

f3) MNS
Environmental Due Diligence Report
S
180 210
I • I• I• I• I
S
W 240 P11 NW
0 300 330 N0
I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I
BRG: 270°W (T) POS: 33°55'18"N,116°58'10"W ±16ft ALT: 2610ft Photograph 7: Facing west along north side 1St Street showing disked fields.

SW W NW N
0 210 240 270 300 330 0
• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• BRG: 275°W (T) POS: 33°55'17"N,116°58'8"W ±16ft ALT: 2604ft FifloW
Photograph 8: Facing west showing disturbed habitat along south side of 1st Street. a Available
o ONLY INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
Property Management B Rail EshreSences
www.00only.coan
714-261-7871
4

Page 1203 of 1893 ends

saJ M
Environmental Due Diligence Report
30 60 90 I 120 150 180
• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• 1

NE E SE S
BRG: 106°E (T) POS: 33°55'17"N,116°58'7"W ±16ft ALT: 2595ft Photograph 9: South side of 1st Street facing east showing residential.

N NE � E SE
0 30 60 90 120 150
I• I• I• I• I• I• 1• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• BRG: 82°E (T) POS: 33°55'18"N,116°58'22"W ±16ft ALT: 2632ft Photo 10: Corner of Maple Avenue and 1st Street facing east showing residential along northside.

I 5

Page 1204 of 1893 ends

MNS
Environmental Due Diligence Report I 6

SW W NW N
210 240 270 - 300 330 0
• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I BRG: 277°W (T) POS: 33°55'18"N, 116°58'22"W ±16ft ALT: 2631ft Photograph 11: Corner of Maple Avenue and 1st Street facing west showing residential along northside and eucalyptus grove along south side.

NE E I SE S
30 60 90 120 150 180
• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• 1• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• BRG: 96°E (T) POS: 33°55'17"N, 116°58'18"W ±16ft ALT: 2602ft 28 Jan 2025, 10:49:03
Photo 12: Facing east at corner of South Palm Avenue and 1St Street showing disturbed residential habitat. 1st Street Widening Project

Page 1205 of 1893 ends

MNS
Environmental Due Diligence Report
S sw
180 210
240 I 270 300
W
• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I•
NW 330
I• I• I• I• I
BRG: 258°W (T) POS: 33°55'17"N, 116°58'18"W ±16ft ALT: 2606ft 28 Jan 2025, 10:49:29
Photograph 13: Facing west along 1st Street at South Palm Avenue showing a lower lying field with disturbed habitat from weed abatement activities.

W NW I N NE
270 300 330 0 30 60
I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• l• I• BRG: 352°N (T) POS: 33°55'17"N, 116°58'20"W ±16ft ALT: 2619ft Photograph 14: Culvert passing under 1st Street on south side where empties into low lying field. 1 7
1st Street Widening Project

Page 1206 of 1893 ends

MNS
Environmental Due Diligence Report

N NE I E SE
0 30 60 90 120 150
• 1 1• I i I• I I I I• I I• I I I 1 I• I I• I
BRG: 79°E (T) POS: 33°55'17"N,116°58'19"W ±16ft ALT: 2608ft Photo 15: Eucalyptus grove along South Palm Avenue.

N NE E SE
0 30 60 I 90 120 150
• I. 1 1. 1• 1• I• 1• 1• 1• 1• I• I• 1• I• I• I• I• I• I BRG: 78°E (T) POS: 33°55'17"N,116°58'36"W ±16ft ALT: 2582ft Photo 16: Disturbed habitat to the east of Beaumont Avenue. 1 8
1st Street Widening Project

Page 1207 of 1893 ends

MNS
Environmental Due Diligence Report
NW 330
• I • I • I •
N
0 I• I •
30 1 60
E
90 120
• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I•
SE
BRG: 45°NE (T) POS: 33°55'17"N,116°58'37"W ±16ft ALT: 2576ft 1 9
Photo 17: Culvert on east side of Beaumont Avenue and south side of 1st Street with Baltic rush, prairie sunflower, star - thistle and disturbed surrounding habitat.

NW N
300 330 0
30 NE E
60 90
• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• I• l• I• I• I• I• I• I 12 BRG: 27°NE (T) POS: 33°55'17"N,116°58'37"W ±16ft ALT: 2575ft 28 Jan 2025, 1148:08
Photo 18: Gas station and other commercial properties along north side of 1st Street at Beaumont Avenue. 1st Street Widening Project

Page 1208 of 1893 ends

MNS
Environmental Due Diligence Report I 10
N NE
0 30 60

1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1• • 1. 1. 1. 1. 1 1. 1. 1. 1
E SE
90 120 150
BRG: 71°E (T) POS: 33°55'18"N,116°58'27"W ±16ft ALT: 2618ft Photo 19: Ornamental vegetation along north side of 1st Street at the western end of the project site. 1st Street Widening Project

Page 1209 of 1893 ends

MNE

CITY OF BEAUMONT
1ST STREET WIDENING PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1210 of 1893 ends

Attachment 2
Species Observed
Scientific Name*
Common Name
Plants
Bebbia juncea
Sweetbush
Bromus sp.

Brome
Avena barbata
Slender wild oat
Brassica tournefotii
Saharan mustard
Salsola tragus
Prickly Russian thistle
Heterotheca grandiflora
Telegraphweed
Eucalyptus camaldulensis
River redgum
Helianthus petiolaris
Prairie sunflower
Juncus balticus
Baltic rush
Centaurea melitensis
Maltese star -thistle
Croton setiger
Dove weed
Pinus halepensis
Aleppo pine
Ficus pumila
Climbing fig
Syagrus romanzoffiana
Queen palm
Rhaphiolepis indica
Indian hawthorn
Phoenix dactylifera
Date palm
Acacia baileyana
Cootamundra wattle
Cupressus sempervirens
Mediterranean cyprus
Eriogonum fasciculatum
California buckwheat
Birds
Tyrannus vociferans
Cassin's kingbird
Calypte anna
Anna's hummingbird
Zonotrichia leucophrys
White -crowned sparrow
Corvus brachyrhynchos
American crow
Setophaga coronata
Yellow-rumped warbler
Haemorhous mexicanus
House finch
Passer domesticus
House sparrow
Anthus rubescens
American pipit
Spinus psaltria
Lesser goldfinch
Buteojamaicensis
Red-tailed hawk
Sturnus vulgaris
European starling
Sayornis saya
Say's Phoebe
Mammals
Sylvilagus audubonii
Desert cottontail

Page 1211 of 1893 ends

MNE

CITY OF BEAUMONT
1ST STREET WIDENING PROJECT

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS

ATTACHMENT III

Page 1212 of 1893 ends

January 8, 2025
Wetlands
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
1st Street Widening Project
Freshwater Emergent Wetland • Lake
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Other
Freshwater Pond Page 1213 of 18 Riverine
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site.

National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
This page was produced by the NWI mapper

ATTACHMENT D

Page 1214 of 1893 ends

MNS
City of Beaumont
1st Street Widening Feasibilty Study
Magnitude of Construction Cost (Drainage)
1/29/2025
Item #
Description
Unit
Quantity
Unit Cost
Cost
Notes
1 24" Reinforced Concrete Pipe
LF
300
$ 500
$ 150,000
Culvert extension only
2 Catch Basin (W=21')
EA
5 $ 25,000
$ 125,000
3 Concrete Headwall
EA
5 $ 15,000
$ 75,000
4 Grouted Rip -Rap
SF
250
$ 50
$ 12,500
Construction Subtotal
$ 362,500
Contingency 25%
$ 90,625
Construction Cost Total
$ 453,125
Additive Alternative
1 Parkway Biofiltration System
EA
5 $ 40,000
$ 200,000
Additive Alternative Subtotal
$ 200,000
Contingency 25%
$ 50,000
Additive Alternative Cost Total
$ 250,000

Page 1215 of 1893 ends

116°58'7.97"W 33°56'21.61"N
116°56'14.61"W 33°54'15.93"N

FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION

SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP

FOR DRAFT FIRM PANEL LAYOUT

SPECIAL FLOOD

HAZARD AREAS

OTHER AREAS OF

FLOOD HAZARD

OTHER AREAS

GENERAL

STRUCTURES
rAfft
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V, 499
With BFE or Depth Zone AE, A0, AH, VE, AR
Regulatory Floodway

0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard Zone X
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee
See Notes Zone X
Area with Flood Risk due to Levee
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard

I I I I I I I I I I

20.2 17.5
8 Effective L0MRs
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
Water Surface Elevation
Coastal Transect
Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)

NOTES TO USERS
For information and questions about this Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), available products associated with this FIRM, including historic versions, the current map date for each FIRM panel, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Flood Map Service Center website at https://msc.fema.gov .

Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, and/or digital versions of this map. Many of these products can be ordered or obtained directly from the website.

Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Flood Map Service Center at the number listed above.

For community and countywide map dates, refer to the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction.

To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.

Basemap information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by USDA, Farm Service Agency (FSA).

This information was derived from NAIP, dated April 11, 2018.

This map was exported from FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) on 1/23/2025 10:59 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. For additional information, please see the Flood Hazard Mapping Updates Overview Fact Sheet at https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/118418 This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.

The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date.

G:J.. JV. 12626

EET FEET
2624`FEET
26191FEI T'
2616,FEET

4.29 FEET

FLOODWAY
226:121FEET
SCALE
A
N
Map Projection:

GCS, Geodetic Reference System 1980;
Vertical Datum: NAVD88
For information about the specific vertical datum for elevation features, datum conversions, or vertical monuments used to create this map, please see the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Report for your community at https://msc.fema.gov 1 inch = 500 feet
1:6,000
0 250 500
0 50 100
200
1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
300
Meters
400

NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM

FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAF
PANEL 812 OF 3805
Panel Contains:

COMMUNITY

CITY OF BEAUMONT

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

CITY OF BANNING
L
060246 0812
OTHER

FEATURES
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary

Page 1216 of 1893 ends

MAP NUMBER
06065C0812G

EFFECTIVE DATE
August 28, 2008

117°W 33°56'21.61"N
116°58'7.12"W 33°54'15.93"N

FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION

SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP

FOR DRAFT FIRM PANEL LAYOUT

SPECIAL FLOOD

HAZARD AREAS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V, A99
With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
Regulatory Floodway

OTHER AREAS OF

FLOOD HAZARD

OTHER AREAS

GENERAL

STRUCTURES
rAfft

20.2 17.5
8 Effective LOMRs
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
Water Surface Elevation
Coastal Transect
Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)

For community and countywide map dates, refer to the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction.

To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.

Basemap information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by USDA, Farm Service Agency (FSA).

This information was derived from NAIP, dated April 11, 2018.

This map was exported from FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) on 1/23/2025 10:57 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. For additional information, please see the Flood Hazard Mapping Updates Overview Fact Sheet at https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/118418 This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.

SCALE
N
Map Projection:

GCS, Geodetic Reference System 1980;
Vertical Datum: No elevation features on this FIRM
For information about the specific vertical datum for elevation features, datum conversions, or vertical monuments used to create this map, please see the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Report for your community at https://msc.fema.gov 1 inch = 500 feet
1:6,000
0 250 500
0 50 100
200
1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
300
Meters
400
jn
National Flood

NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM

FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAF
PANEL 811 OF 3805
Panel Contains:

COMMUNITY

CITY OF BEAUMONT

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
NI �� FAVIEL
060245 0811
OTHER

FEATURES
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary

Page 1217 of 1893 ends

MAP NUMBER
06065C0811G

EFFECTIVE DATE
August 28, 2008

NOTES:

1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEARING OF THE ITS OF BEAUMONT ., PROPOSE=D WORK AREA, AND RELOCATION COSTS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEER WITH A PARKWAY 44 `z

CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AT THE PRE --CONSTRUCTION MEETING FOR REVIEW AND CDMMENT.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY AND TREE' IMPR E ENS REHABILITA TN i ALL OCCUPANTS AFFECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION, A MINIMUM OF TWO p 'tt' (2)BUSINESS DAYS ADVANCE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AND DURATION FOR

OF WORK,
cctPROJECT
,
tea
SITE 6TH STREET
ST

RA MS,EY ST,

2. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALTRANS 1 S 7" 1T1?.I15'

STANDARDS AND COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. p
CALIFORNIA AVE TO PENNS YL VA AVE.

CITY DFBEAUMONT
'....

. ....
c4
1 3. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT IN

PLACE ALL OF THE STREET CENTERLINE MONUMENTS AND TO NOTIFY THE CALIFORNIA ENGINEER IF ANY OF SAID MONUMENTS BECOME DISTURBED OR DAMAGED.

AVE.
(FROM
EUCLID
AVE.

BEAUMONT
-NIA
A VE .

MA
GN0L I A
A VE .

MAPLE
A VE
w
.
1ST
04 53
4 STREET

Ev
Lb

VICINITY MAP

4. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY TO THE CITY OF N.T.S.

BEAUMONT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FOR AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR ALL ;#
1 • -€
I �' •
,�„_ �,
a
m,,
1 I! I 1! 6 f I l I I f I E I!
_
I
.....,.
i
J
41 '5.:..

J
...-
f f
................
- Z
'� ti
C
.k1i},a
f
L S
i
.2pp}] �.
off
1 WORK ON EXISTING CITY MAINTAINED ROADS AND ANY OTHER NECESSARY PERMITS. i ,
o
amn
1 i
f
?
+ ,
v
Axw
�w•
.'
S 1
T
.f.. 4"'
f�
rc
3 F
a
t
�r
r
s

_
..._.
1 ~�
-

5. DRIVEWAY APPROACHES WILL BE INSTALLED AND CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF .in
!�
,,.W „w ,..w ,sbe ,woo �... • ,.
-_..
_
II
fir!
�,M„ „�
- .�
, _

—
--
.
r
,
LEGEND
BEAUMONT STANDARD 206 AND 207

,`
. _.. ._
�,..�.--�-'-
'"�—
°''�"�i
�°":
'
—� STREET SIGN

6. ASPHALTIC EMULSION (FOG SEAL) SHALL BE APPLIED NOT LESS THAN =-E
—.—:
`� E
Ir
j_•+°
_ _� ' '
t
,
—u
F
'�
— 1
„.}

,s
�j
1 MONUMENT
p FD �Id AS NOTED
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF THE ASPHALT .

SURFACING AND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 0.05 GALLONS PER ` '`"
-
y�-•-•+,
may a
•m6.'
' ..
�l. Jr ]jy`�'
r'
'
1 . r

r .. ,
f'
['.t t
f
..
0 WATER VALVE
CALTRANS STANDARDS.
7, MECHANICAL SWEEPING SHALL BE DONE BY CONTRACTOR PER CALTRANS STANDARDS.

8. LONGITUDINAL PAVING JOINTS SHALL BE WITHIN ONE (1) FOOT OF LANE LINES OR IN CENTER OF LANES.
ommammi
mr.mm®.q
MAPLE
AVE.
i
_____r Imimm
l
mummiggimg
Immune= immomil
immommill
1 ST
■. ___i
STREET
=moms
moill
. _.r.r...
seir.m
PENNSYLVANIA AVE.

GAS LINE

W WATER METER
pQ GAS

BACK FLOW VALVE

I
m....� .®�
� 1.�...�
,.�....
�
7C CHAIN LINK FENCE : . . . .
}
INDEX
MAP

9. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OR ITS AGENTS DOES NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR AND HIS ENGINEER FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE • J
tl
lit
f 477,4
{
;
'�•, ,a

"'
PDWIs'R ALE

FIRE HYDRANT

CORRECTION OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, v ^

t.
:
"�
-`J
,
..

UPON REQUEST THE APPROPRIATE PLAN REVISIONS SHALL BE PROMPTLY

REQUEST,

M
-�
�.

TH
S
M
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. -
-
T"--',
_
, : . ... _`'
' cam '
�
ti
1 1
.u,: s. •
'-
-
TREE
,
`
1O, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SMOOTH RIDING TRANSITION AT THE BEGINNING / ,, r
/
,
� ,-
; i
""`'3
r
� ..
w.*h

r�
ESTIMATED CUT: 13,693 CUBIC
YARDS
WALL
AND THE END OF THE A.C. OVERLAY, AND ANY AREA REQUIRING i
gI
.211 SAINTERSECTIONS,
I.
�,,,
•'
'
,_� i'tql

ESTIMATED FILL: 3,922 CUBIC
YARDS
TRANSITION OF THE NEW A,C, OVERLAY SURFACE, TO THE EXISTING. SURFACE, .4...

A'
�.. ;"
i
EXPORT: 9,770 CUBIC YARDS

11. NEW STRIPING SHALL BE CAT —TRACKED IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING OVERLAY

OPERATION AND VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE CITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO FINAL

OPERATION
STRIPING. STRIPING SHALL BE PER STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC MANUAL, R/W .� . .pn .w wrrrr em immil rr
84'
el
.r..mmmmd
m..mammm mums=
R/W
e®mmam�
RAN

MICHIGAN
mrrrrrmis
AVE. 5
84'
mmilrrr... .um.ri.mea rrre...... arrr.ma
.

R
R/W
80' R
AND THESE DRAWINGS.

CONTRACT
TC
TC
TC
rC
TC
18'
n'
TC
32'
5'
2'
181
22'
32'
6"
_ 5',
14'
4'
22'
32'
6'u`
6'

EXISTING
20'
-
-

12. ALL MANHOLES, SURVEY MARKERS, AND VALVES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO EXISTING 20'
""
GRADE, BY THE CONTRACTOR, AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE OVERLAY.

13. DURING PAVING OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE

REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PROJECT'S SPECIFICATIONS,

14. STREET STRUCTURAL SECTION IS TENTATIVE, FINAL STRUCTURAL SECTION WILL BE EXISTING 6"
cI o.00
EXISTING sA

CURB & GUTTER

CURB GUTTER
—o_2src
1•
_
DETERMINED AFTER ROUGH GRADING PER CALTRANS STANDARD 301 METHOD. 1 -'
_
r
__

15. STREET LIGHTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH CITY OF BEAUMONT APPROVED �. _ ......:4,;..�....,, ..�._.-. . .. . . . . � -•
� __,:.-: .-.:.-=.::_:,:__,,_�.�-
LIGHTING STANDARDS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.

16. ALL STORM DRAINS, CATCH BASINS, AND STORM WATER RUNOFF STRUCTURES WILL BE _._
A
. ....::. ..:M_,--.
•., 3
A , .

FIRST STREET
13 FIRST STREET
C c 13
/ RS T STREET

PROVIDED WITH ADEQUATE CAPABILITIES TO FILTER AND RETAIN SEDIMENT AND GRIT, OIL AND

GREASE, TO PREVENT POLLUTION IN STORM WATER RUNOFF IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF BEAUMONT'S BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND ::THE BEAUMONT DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN

FOR STORM WATER AS WELL AS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IDENTIFIED IN THE CURRENT REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY PERMITTEES.

RA
NOTIFICATIONS:

FROM STA : 31+49.10 TO 36+11.11
(NO SCALE)
80 R/W

VW
FROM STA : 36+11.11 TO 39+50.51
(NO SCALE) ..

R/W RA 80'
80'
S7" 4 .91
FROM A • .�9+5O 51 To 8+fly
(NO
RA
TC
""
LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 141
6'
20'
. FL
32' _
s'
2t
TC q. TC
14'
'
FL q.

20.'
TC
32' s'
2'

THE LOCATIONS AND VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE PRIOR TO f
.

f 4'
. G' -
. 20' .
- 32' ,
6' _
2'
-
F

DETERMINE EXACT
COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND

ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL CONCERNED UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF EXCAVATION. CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICES ALERT AT (8OO) 227-26OO
-v.02 rc
•
OLD. 00
�,
•, ,
EXISTING PR€VATEIY OWNED IMPROVEMENTS ON PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY SHALL BE PROTECTED

OR REPLACED IF DAMAGED, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER,
„
-r:
2%
TYP.
2 2
J.

2%
1•
.ti
�?.
_
1 2%
�
I_
2 �
2 �

NAT RUNOFF ALLOWED TODRAIN THE
.. :
- ��
SHALL ,. . _..__.._: _...._ _._... _., , :._ .M_.

N TRASH, DEBRIS OF ANY CONTAMINATED BE LLQ ED
o s Es ,
_ - :.
�.• ,,. _ -
-
10 SHALL PROTECT X I EXISTING CATCH BASINS N BY U ,.. n, - ., EXISTING CATCH BASINS. CONTRACTOR THE E S G B S S USE A

•
_
OF SAND BAGS AND OTHER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. ALL THE COLLECTED SEDIMENT 13 IAA+ 13 FIRST R _A
AND DEBRIS SHALL BE CAREFULLY REMOVED AND DISPOSED OFF SITE. F I I I S T STREET 13 A
13 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT {USA} AT LEAST TWO (2) FIRST FROM STA 48+05.91 TO 52+20.84
STREET
FROM STA : 56+85.98 TO 72+90.59
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK, ..AND CONTACT THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES AND :

AGENCIES: FROM STA: 52+20.84

VIVO SCALE)
TO 58+85.98 R I3
N
� OSCALE)
a�'
CITY OF BEAUMONT DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS (MR. IJEEPAK MOORJANI, RCE) (951) 769-852O (NO SCALE)
1 14'
FL
s'
20'
FL
32'
$P
2,
BEAUMONT-CHERRY VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (MR. CHUCK BUTCHER) (951) 845-9581 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY (USA) 1-8O0-422-4133
CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND QUANTITIES: QUANTITY UNITS
-
1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (USA) 1-8O0-422-4133 .40' A.C. PAVEMENT OVER 0.90' COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE CLASS III I \ 229,E19 SQUARE FEET O RELOCATE EXISTING MAIL BOX(ES) 0 CONSTRUCT 0GENERAL
6 EACH
TELEPHONE (USA) 1-800-422-4133
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 0 CONSTRUCT 6" A.C. DIKE PER PER R,C.T,D, STD, 212 231.96 LINEAR FEET 1O REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER (95?} 955 12OO •
INLAND VALLEY CABLEVISION (951) 787-2031 C) CONSTRUCT TYPE "O" MOUNTABLE DIKE PER CALTRANS STANDARD A67 3,556 LINEAR FEET 11 REMOVE/RELOCATE EXISTING POWER POLE, 2 LINEAR FEET
(BY OTERS) TYP, 16 EACH
"? : .
-
-
2�'-
2%
%. ...

F
2 =.
04 CONSTRUCT CROSS GUTTER PER R. C.T.D, STD, 209 /1\4\3 .2' 3 EACH 12 INSTALL OVERSIDE DRAIN FOR MOUNTABLE DIKE PER CAL TRANS STD. D87D 3 EACH
3 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING. THE :.COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF-.JHIS.:,PROJECT INCLUDING SAFETY ® I INSTALL 24" R.C.P. STORM DRAIN LINE D E --565:2.9.601 LINEAR FEET A 13 CONSTRUCT TYPE A-6 CURB PER R.C.T.D. 3 STD. 200 3,717 LINEAR FEET p
OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS 'REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND

FIRST STREET
EET
CONSTRUCT CURB .INLET CATCH BASIN PER R.C.T.D. STD. 300 I D i 3 EACH 14 FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL. WORKING HOURS AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, IDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE CITY AND ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL. LIABILITY, O CONSTRUCT GUTTER DEPRESSION CASE "C" PER R.C.T.D, STD. 311 # E 3 EACH A15 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY PER R.C.T.D. STD.

FROM STA : 72+90.59 TO 77+03.39
207 12 EACH (NO SCALE)
REAL OR ALLEGED IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ' ON THIS PROJECT, � CONSTRUCT AC DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER R.C.T.D. STD. 206 � �f 1 H EACH 16 CONSTRUCT HEADWALL/WINGWALL PER EXCEPT FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE CITY OR ENGINEER.

CAL -TRANS STD. O89 2 EACH L J
Service Alert
Cali : TD i_L FREE
, 1-800-227-2600
TWO WORK i NG DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
A
OOtVSTRUCT Ci�RB ANi3 Gt�TTER PER R.C.T.D. STD. 200Underground

RECOMMENDED FOR

APPROVAL
SEAL
-
PPROVED BY DATE -6-0
> [i
CITY

STREETIMPROVEMENT
(FROM CALIFORNIA
Ti
�
S
OE

BEAUMONT

S TR
AVE. TO

w.� S'""
E
PLANS
E T
PENNSYLVANIA AVE.)2/6/O6
.T T
SHEET NO.

OF 5 SC-IT5 .
11/225570:

CONSTRUCT CROSS GLITTER PER R,C.T,D. STD. ads
1i
t � �
- --. _ � . .

ZfB/f38
CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY PER t R.C.T.D. 20�
►4'
�
�,
%
*,
�� pf a4�
�'' �P o� F
4r *
o r r+
NO. O051047
Exp.9-'•3O--O9
-
9 ?
). CO,/

OF CALF
((
1 2/6/08
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN PER R.C.T.D. STD. 300
-
_
_ ' :_ �351�' h'�ye Park Drive, Suite ,204
: Temecuk4 Ca ' orraa £,25.90
Ted.• (951) 6�'G »�4t Far ��51J 6?`6 .2d54
2/5/08
CONSTRUCT GUTTER DEPRESSION CASE "C" PER R.C.T.D.

STfl. 311

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WO S
INSTALL 24 R.C.P.
�
DATE
The private engineer signing these plans is responsibly for the accuracy and acceptability of the design hereon. In the event of discrepancies arising after city approval or during construction. the private engineer shall be responsible far determining an i city. nble solution and revising the glans for approval by the city.
2/27/08
REVISE PRC�F€LE STATIONING AND ELEVATIONS
FILE NO.
1560 A
2/27/08
CO�iSTIUCT HEADWALL/Y5+[trfGlNAI t PER GAL --TAMS STET. O89 CHECKED BY:
''
SCALE:

As Sownacce

BENCHMARK N G H M A R K
2/27/08

ADJUST CONSTRUCTION QUANTITES

FOR City �Seaumont
W.O.

DATE:

FEB. 2OO8
CITY OF BEAUMONT No. O5.A.82
ELEVATION: 2fi31.257
2/28/08

REVISE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS
DATE
Ji/O e
DESIGNED BY:TLC DRAWN BY: BH CHECKED BY:

DATE
BY
MARK
APPR.

DATE

Page 1218 of 1893 ends

DATE

BY MARK
APPR
DATE

RECOMMENDED FOR

APPROVAL
DATE
CHECKED BY:

SEAL
sof ESSIpv
( Mo%
CC NO. C051047
Exp.9--30-09
APPROVED BY DATEW- %

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WOR
<S
Urban Logic Consultant's
49517 Ridge Park ,drive, Suite ,200
Temecula; Calzfornia 92580
TeL: (9$/) 876-/944 Paz (95/) 678-2054(
SCALE: As Shown

BENCHMARK
CITY OF BEAUMONT No. 05.A.82
ELEVATION: 2631.257

CITY OF BEAUNCNT
STREET 6VPRCVE\ENT PLANS
=1RST STRET
STA. 31+39.84 TO 43+00

ENGINEER

REVISIONS
CITY
DESIGNED BY: TLC
DRAWN BY: BH
CHECKED BY:

DATE i 1hope i
--,,-

Page 1219 of 1893 ends

FOR The City of Beaumont

47+00
48+00
49+00
50+00
51+00
52+00
53+00
54+00
55+00
W cn
CO
43+00

RIGHT OF WAY

RIGHT OF WAY
,x RIGHT OF WAY
RIGHT OF WAY S "'
81*
44+00

RIGHT OF' WAY
N
45+00
,4 FL
24",MP;
STA:43+79.64 FIRST ST. 2

BEAUMONT AVENUE -
` ; f •WtiEXISTING C.M.F
81'
.EDGE OF PAVEMENT

BEAUMONT AVENUE

GRAPHIC SCALE
(IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.

Underground Service Alert
Coil: TOLL FREE
1—800-227-2600

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
The private engineer signing these plans is responsible for the accuracy and acceptability of the design hereon. In the event of discrepancies arising after city approval or during construction, the private engineer shall be responsible for determining an acceptable solution and revising the plans for approval by the city.
/25108
2/6/08

RIGHT OF WAY

74.69 EX. LIP`._
CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER PER R.C.T.D. STD. 200
CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY PER R.C.T.D. STD. 207
46+00

RIGHT OF WAY
/

RECOMMENDED FOR

APPROVAL
222 l :.

FIRST STREET
SEAL
QlQfESsIOH
►� �C.�P MpORS L^
W ig
ci Z�m
NO. C051047 27
w'Exp.9_30--09/

OF- CANY(

APPROVED BY
z
•
2605 .. , nsz
. ..�.

La co
U
Z
on
HIGH POINT ELEV = 26O962
HIGH POINT STA = 531-14 26
P;VI STA = 52+70
PVi ELEV .- 26#5,54
POR. OF .50Q.00'VC
co g
(V
0 2i
141
`� ,,y ,. } .:\ `— z ., RIGHT OF WAY
DAYLIGHT LINE ` �� %` N� r` W
. \ 43 11"
y F �` /
•
/Ail LA ---•:

DATE 4 E ''
Urban Logic consultants
SCALE: As Shown
.R409 Park I ve, Suite .200
Temecula; California 9,259)
Tel: (9510 #76'--1941Paz (951) 8782051

BENCHMARK
CITY OF BEAUMONT No. 05.A.82
ELEVATION: 2631.257
z
0 Tr -
CO
N
Dart
R�
N
ry}
z
"PROPOSED 32` 'SOUTH;
CONSTRUCTION`S TO S
260
261.0—
.
2605-
2s�e
2605 -

PROFILE
HORIZ.1 "=40'
VERT .1 "=4'
CD
C7
ul
7 t
� A
UU
300 UU
Z U)
:3 LIJ
U3
I
CONSTRUCT 0.40' A.C. PAVEMENT OVER 0:90' COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 1€ CONSTRUCT TYPE "0" MOUNTABLE DIKE PER CALTRANS STANDARD A87 INSTALL 24" R.C.E. STORM DRAIN LINE
CONSTRUCT CURB INLET CATCH BASIN PER R.C.T,D. STD. 300
CONSTRUCT GUTTER DEPRESSION CASE "C" PER R.C.T.D. STD. 311

REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER
REMOVE/RELOCATE EXISTING POWER POLE.

CONSTRUCT TYPE A-6 CURB PER R.C.T.D. STI?. 200

INURE IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS
CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER R.C.T.D. STD. 207.

CITY OF BEAUMONT

STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS

FIRST STR IT
STA. 43+00 TO 55+00
FOR The Oily of Beaumont
SHEET NO.

OF 5 SHTS.

Page 1220 of 1893 ends

2595
2595
CD
CD
U)}�
F-
W
W U)
W
WZ
W..J
W
WO
2 55+00
56+00 57+00

MAPLE AVENUE

GRAPHIC SCALE
MATCH EX.

CONDITIONS
( IN FEET )
finch= 40 ft.

A,5
API.:X.:A NU
r
7,.
58+00
4,8.91.

INV.86.33_
,f10X 10 G TED/
RIPRAP
Ca, 6
rya'
Q"r
✓ °7.

C4 c0
Pillk
59+00
0 to
5 X 15 GROUTED
RIPRAP
60+00
EX. RIW
a �c�o
C2
F--
o\LA-
rfi
61+00
RIW

FIRST STREET
62+00
53+00
54+00

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
CONSTRUCT 0.40' A.C. PAVEMENT OVER 0.90' COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE 2Y
65+00
CONSTRUCT TYPE "D" MOUNTABLE DIKE PER CALTRANS STANDARD A87 CONSTRUCT CROSS GUTTER PER R.C.T.D. STD. 209
INSTALL 24" R.C.P. STORM DRAIN LINE
CONSTRUCT CURB INLET CATCH BASIN PER R.C.T.D. STD. 300
CONSTRUCT GUTTER DEPRESSION CASE "C" PER R.C.T.D. STD. 311

RELOCATE EXISTING MAIL BOX(ES)

REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER
REMOVE/RELOCATE EXISTING POWER POLE.

INSTALL OVERSIDE DRAINS FOR MOUNTABLE DIKE PER CAL TRANS STD. D87D x 2130,5

CLASS II
HIGH .:POINT ELEY =-.2-607.17
HIGH PONT STA `; 66+44.73
P .STA .67+35
66+00
t,
P -VI ELEV 2610.46.
400.00' .' VC
_.,,,261-5 -
-25
._..._.;2.605.......__m_

PROFILE
HORIZ.1"=40'
VERT.1"=4'
67+00
C]
CO in
ite
UJ

0. W
W
z (I)
J W
W
0 2
CONSTRUCT TYPE A-6 CURB PER R.C.T.D. 5Tt]. 200.

CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY PER R.C.T.D. STD. 207
CONSTRUCT HEADWALL/WINGWALL PER CAL -TRANS STD. 089
Underground Service Alert
Cali: TOLL FREE
1-800-227--2600

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
1/25/08
CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER PER R.C.T.D. STD. 200
2/5/08
2/6/O8
2/6/08
CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY PER R.C.T.D. STD. 207
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN PER R.C.T.D. STD. 300
CONSTRUCT GUTTER DEPRESSION CASE "C" PER R.C.T.D.

STD. 311
The private engineer signing these plans is responsible for the accuracy and acceptability of the design hereon. In the event of discrepancies arising after city approval or during construction, the private engineer shall be responsible for determining an acceptable solution and reviis€ng the plans for approval by the city.
2/6/08
2/27/08
t INSTALL 24" R.C.P.

A CONSTRUCT HEADWALL/WINGwALL PER CAL —TRANS STD. 089

REVISE PROFILE STATIONING AND ELEVATIONS
2/27/08
DATE
BY
MARK
APPR.

DATE

ENGINEER

REVISIONS
CITY
DATE
CHECKED BY:

DATE 4/o:/';g
SEAL
ciaN
cts
tlr
0 NO. C051047
Exp,9--30-09
CAM --

APPROVED BY
N -DIRECTOR \F PUBLIC WORKS
DATE
Urban Logic Consultants
0517 Ridge Park Prove, Suave ZOO
Temecula, California 92596
Tel: /95f) 676-1.914 Fax (951) 676—'O51
SCALE: As Shown
DATE:

FEB. 2008

BENCHMARK
CITY OF BEAUMONT No. 05.A.82
ELEVATION: 2631.257

CITY OF BEAUMONT
STREET IV'PROVEMEN.T PLANS
FIST
STA. 55+QQ TO 67+00
FOR The City of Bea rno i1
w.

SHEET NO.
4 OF SHTS.

FILE NO.
/5O
DESIGNED BY: TLC
DRAWN BY: BH CHECKED BY: JW

Page 1221 of 1893 ends

2603
11 HIGH. POINT.. ELEV...,- 2607.43
'HIGH POINT: STA = .66+44.73
I POI; STA = . 67+35
:ELEV-------r-26,10,72t
400.00'' VC ~ '�
I)
0 2605 -

PROPOSED FINISHED
- SURFACE ;© - CENTERLINE
0 1 HIGH POINT ELEV = 2607.1-7
-- I-IlO P 11N f STA = ;881'44 7,3
i PVI STA =167+35 :

PVi ELEV = 2610,46
'POR O 400.00'.-. VC.' -
67+00
CD
C7
y !�
W I—
li'
I W
Z
W J
W I
2 73+00
74+00
75+00
76+00
77+00
78+00
68+00
r �r

GRAPHIC SCALE
co
3 m
r R135'
CrD
j CO
it)
L=54.98'
X54,98'
CROSS[ GUTTER,
69+00
in;
• -
w ni•
R=35'_
to
T
LI

MICHIGAN AVENUE
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
..PROPOSED ----32'. SOUTH
TGP .,0
70+00

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
x25.9].7
71+00
9NI STA = '73+-O0
P l.. ELEV ` 2576;55
Pg1R. OF 250.00' VC
72+00
EXISTING . GROUND,... .
0: CEN TERLI'N E
PROPOSED 32' SOUTH I..

TOP OF CURB
x2
x 2571 .5
10 X 10 GROUT
MOv C.M`.�
l O X l U GROUTED
RIPRAP

FIRST STREET
LOW POINT ELEV = 2571.94
LOI1 POINT STA = -75+84.56- -``.. '
PVi STA 75+25
VI ELEV = 2571.46
200.00': VC
co "'V f4i. 6---
_re)
F.`1
o
74 EE�
x

PROPOSED FINISHED
SURFACE t.CENTERLINE F
/1 .00{ % I f'��'^

EXISTING CL PROFILE
co
-.

PROFILE
HORIZ.1"=40'
VERT.1"=4'
:-,,ter::�, i'T L�
�1w6:3..�
1 IA AVE.

G
._ P._ `e..,• G •- G
• -.._M

PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE
0 CONSTRUCT 0.40' A.C. PAVEMENT OVER 0.90' COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE CLASS II O CONSTRUCT TYPE "D" MOUNTABLE DIKE PER CALTRANS STANDARD A87 CONSTRUCT CROSS GUTTER PER CITY OF BEAUMONT STANDARD 209 INSTALL 24" R.C.P. STORM DRAIN LINE
0 CONSTRUCT A.C. DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER R.C.T.D. STD. 206 4 RELOCATE EXISTING MAIL BOX(ES)
0 REMOVE/RELOCATE EXISTING POWER POLE.
12 INSTALL OVERSIDE DRAINS FOR MOUNTABLE DIKE PER CAL TRANS STD. 087D CONSTRUCT TYPE A-6 CURB PER R.C.T.D. STD. 200
Underground Service Alert
Gall: TOLL FREE
1-800-227--2600

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
1/25/08
1/25/08
2/6/08
The private engineer signing these plans is responsible for the accuracy and acceptability of the design hereon. In the event of discrepancies arising after city approval or during construction, the private engineer shall be responsible for determining on acceptable solution and revising the plans for approval by the city.
2/27/08
2/27/08
2/28/08
CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER PER R.C.T.D. STD. 200
CONSTRUCT CROSS GUTTER PER R.C.T.D. STD. 209
CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY PER R.C.T.D. 207

REVISE PROFILE STATIONING AND ELEVATION
CONSTRUCT HEADWALL/WINGWALL PER CAL —TRANS STD. 089

REVISE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS

RECOMMENDED FOR
APPROVAL ,\
1 ._5✓
ta'
DATE
SEAL
okof E55ioN4
�+:i�Qpl� Moo
�v
r
N0. C051047
Exp.9-30-09

PPROVED Y

DIRECTOR
DATES • r�
Urban Lope Consultants
40'517 1?dye Park ,drove, Saute .288
Temecula; California 92598
Tel: (951 6761-1,911 Fax (85/) 67762854
CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY PER R.C.T.D. STD. 207
CONSTRUCT HEADWALL WINGWALL PER CAL —TRANS STD. D89

CITY OF BEAUMONT

STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS

FIST SRET
STA. 67+00 TO 77+13.86
SHEET NO.

OF 5 SHTS.

FILE NO.

APPR.

DATE
DATE
BY
MARK

ENGINEER

REVISIONS
CITY
CHECKED BY:

DATE 3I.
'pT�fV t f
OF C A�1

Page 1222 of 1893 ends

SCALE: As Shown
DATE:

FEB. 2008

BENCHMARK
CITY OF BEAUMONT No. 05.A.82
ELEVATION: 2631.257
FOR The Cit of Beaumont W.O.

PARTME
T
OF THE
USGS U.S. DEU.S. GEOLI INTERIOR

GIICAL SURV Y
science for a changing world
The National Map
US Topo

BEAUMONT QUADRANGLE

CALIFORNIA - RIVERSIDE COUNTY

7.5 -MINUTE SERIES
-117.0000° NT

34.0000°
3762000mN
61 60
59 58
57 56
55 54
53 52
51 50
49 01
02 03
04 05
06 07
08 09
10 511 000mE

33.8750° NT
-117.0000°
501 000m E
02 Produced by the United States Geological Survey
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and
1 000 -meter grid:Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 11S This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may be
generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before entering private lands.

Imagery NAIP, April 2020 - June 2020
Roads U.S. Census Bureau, 2016
Roads within US Forest Service Lands FSTopo Data
with limited Forest Service updates, 2018
Names GNIS, 1981 - 2021
Hydrography National Hydrography Dataset, 2001 - 2020
Contours National Elevation Dataset, 2019
Boundaries Multiple sources; see metadata file 2017 - 2021 Public Land Survey System BLM, 2020
Wetlands FWS National Wetlands Inventory 1975 - 1985
03 0°2'
1 MILS
..MN
11°37'
207 MILS
UTM GRID AND 2019 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
U.S. National Grid
100,000 - m Square ID
NT
04 1

0.5 05
0 06
SCALE 1:24 000
KILOMETERS 1
07 2
1000
1 500

0.5 0
METERS
0 1000
2000
1000 0
MILES
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
7000 8000 9000 10000
FEET
CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
This map was produced to conform with the
National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard.
08 QUADRANGLE LOCATION
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
1 Yucaipa
2 Forest Falls
3 San Gorgonio Mountain
4 El Casco
5 Cabazon
6 Lakeview
7 San Jacinto
8 Lake Fulmor
09 10

ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Expressway
Secondary Hwy
Ramp
lipInterstate Route
BFS Primary Route
Local Connector
Local Road
4WD
11 US Route ED State Route
FS Passenger H FS High
Route Clearance Route
Check with local Forest Service unit
for current travel conditions and restrictions.

BEAUMONT, CA
2021
-116.8750°

33.8750°
-116.8750°

34.0000°
Grid Zone Designation
11S

Page 1223 of 1893 ends

ADJOINING QUADRANGLES

J MNS
1' Street Widening Feasibility Study

ATTACHMENT E

Page 1224 of 1893 ends

Page to the North: NT -0253-C
411
64 1289713E
4760008E
d-£STO-1N :Tse/N all oT abed
Billing department; SCE only charges for maps that include SCE infrastructure. 4719527E UG-5
Y 11
8901 4606126E
4115231E E,'
/ 4603537E
U
Ln.
5601589
Arco
ampm
5611638
4201995E 4672573E,�! 0 0 4601700E 3" duct
Jack in the Box
tID8g110074 2190470E L - 1.1-r
OE E
R co
d d
5601590
ED m
79 O 0
> >
a <
O 0
E E
O
to to
1C
�j. ;flirt 4" Jll lrt 4606123E
`to06124E -�
4719528E
u
CI"
4246690E
1,4246691E
4246692E
O
5" duct
E 1st St
4639556E
O 4227233E
4607085E
4606122E
4606121E UG-5598903
1CG�U0'
I4 7 E FIM77959405N.•. 483E
3 666 2210596E O GT115707
P 4246693E
I
Facility Map
UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT DIAL 811

CALL USA FOR UNDERGROUND LOCATING
Grid Name: NT -0253-E (US National Grid)
Cap ---

DIST PAD

DIST PEDESTAL

DIST POLE ---

DIST SPLICEBOX

DIST VAULT
OH Conductor 0 - 750 volts UG Telecom Cable
OH Conductor 751 volts - 22.5 kV — — - OH Telecom Cable UG Conductor 751 volts - 22.5 kV Fiber Optic Span - MapSales Overhead Conductor - Other/Unknown Overhead
Duct DIA Inches Underground
UG Segment / Duct Alignment Parcels
PagePto e So Fi:1VT�02� G
E-3rd=S
E 3rd
E 1st St
E
bst=5
Date: 2/5/2025
Geomatics I Central Field Services
For Reference Only
Features depicted herein are planning level accuracy, and intended for informational purposes only. Distances and locations may be distorted at this scale. Always consult with the proper legal documents or agencies regarding such
features.

Service Layer Credits: World Street Map: Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User Community
National Geographic Style Base: Sources: Esri, USGS
Fiber Optic: USGS, FEMA
World Hillshade: Esri, NASA, NGA,
National Geographic Style: Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAH, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the
GIS User Community
0 30 60 120
Feet
1 inch ecuals 133 feet

ISOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON
An EDISON INTERNATIONAL"' Company
t: NT -0253-F
w
a)
0 (1)

Page to the North: NT -0253-D
Lm4760008E
J-£SZO-IN .4sa/ \ ail of abed
Billing department; SCE only charges for maps that include SCE infrastructure. 4607084E
4606121E
2190472E
U� 4606120E
UG-5598903 i
4607831E 2190474E
2190486E
`; 1Ut 1Y-JGL w
4607829E 4671731E ® UG-5598904
4671733E 4607827E
Cx p
2190488E 2190489E _ „
-- , ,S Hurt
4607837E
4813513E
2210596E GT115707
2190473E
-
E 1st St
a)
E
a
tv
ETT
483239E
483240E
483241E
483242E
4376661E
O1733182E
483243E
Michigan Ave
Michigan Ave
1248010E
E1st St
14607826E
4115276E
1806250E
4115275E
1805948E
Facility Map
UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT DIAL 811

CALL USA FOR UNDERGROUND LOCATING
Grid Name: NT -0253-F (US National Grid)
0 Cap --- OH Conductor 0 - 750 volts UG Segment / Duct Alignment * DIST HANDHOLE OH Conductor 751 volts - 22.5 kV UG Telecom Cable CIE DIST PEDESTAL UG Conductor 0 - 750 volts Fiber Optic Span - MapSales DIST POLE UG Conductor 751 volts - 22.5 kV Underground
o DIST VAULT Duct DIA Inches Parcels
PagePto e So �:1VT�02� H
E 3rd -St
—E"1'st=St
G
Tv
C
-P
Date, 2/5/2025
Geomatics I Central Field Services
For Reference Only
Features depicted herein are planning level accuracy, and intended for informational purposes only. Distances and locations may be distorted at this scale. Always consult with the proper legal documents or agencies regarding such
features.

ISOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON
On I:lit/OV IV'I't: RV'.t TIO 11." Company
LU
c+�
I
m
O
to
CO
LU
a)
0 a)
Cn
r0
a

Page to the North: NT -0353-C
2190488E 2190489E
E 1st St
14607826E
0 O 4115275E
0 rt
TI
N
Ul
W
jri
Billing department; SCE only charges for maps that include SCE infrastructure. 4607837E
4477933E
4019171E.
_.1
N-A.190493E I r
♦ I
2357541E
4415123E
401-9172E
to
co
y
ni
CD
1 44019173E
4 4242245E
I /
I /
I /
I j
4019174E
1 li
co
C
la
N
C
C
m
a
5" duct
o UG-5641287
4415124E 5"duct 4415125E 3"duct
Sunnyslope
Cemetery
E 1st St
E 1st S
2260711E
♦
Facility Map
UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT DIAL 811

CALL USA FOR UNDERGROUND LOCATING
Grid Name: NT -0353-E (US National Grid)
Cap
• DIST HANDHOLE

DIST MANHOLE
❑ DIST PAD

DIST POLE
© DIST SPLICEBOX
0 DIST VAULT

TRNS POLE
CIE DIST PEDESTAL --- OH Conductor 0 - 750 volts
OH Conductor 751 volts - 22.5 kV UG Segment / Duct Alignment --- OH Conductor 66 - 300 kV UG Telecom Cable
UG Conductor 0 - 750 volts Fiber Optic Span - MapSales
UG Conductor 751 volts - 22.5 kV Underground
Duct DIA Inches Parcels
pnrrc 1 777 rrf 1 S2QQ
Page to ' e ou
5" duct
5592216
5592215
Ct
v),
9,
5" duct
C
rr
5587924
Date: 2/5/2025
Geomatics I Central Field Services
0-
G
f?
For Reference Only
5587886
Features depicted herein are planning level accuracy, and intended for informational purposes only. Distances and locations may be distorted at this scale. Always consult with the proper legal documents or agencies regarding such
features.

ISOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON
On I:lit/OV IV'I't: RV'.t TI()\' 11.' Company

w
CI
w
0 110
O
A
co
0 114
186
190
L 13
J
250 296
r
149
151
155
L9
£621.40 8ZZ I- abed
BE4um cwrAvE
Co
W

BEA UMONT AVE
v �+
v
�w l'
J
4i1 I ��"'' ,ril" atep
.A
I
VI
VI
V+
I r
I u+ /
II
r
I
I
I
I
L5
v
v
649
l2
CO
w
0 X
L';6
97 I
m
UI
-9H 2000
r
N
655
KOBE ST Kobe St 5
i '718 L1
L 32 732 ll 731 728 729
'I 730
u
r'''--
133 756 745 740 743 v
756
ar
L 34 773 780 771 758 765 778 anV w ale d SPALMAVE Palm Ave 789 794 795 A 791 789 794 L2
805
L 35
8 136 811
L37 823
0 1.

A
L 38
L 39
L 40
L41
L 42
1 43
l 44
NJ
NJ
V1
N
NJ
'D
6VZ
r
VI
1257
1265
1V
°D 1269
1289
1295
re CI
O
N
835
849
865
883
903
919
927
945
959
808 815
816 833
828
840
852
868
890
912
924
938
950
962
973 974
1222
987 990
N
1232
1238
1250
g 1254
1262
0 1268
N
N
1227
1233
1245
1257
1263
1271
1275
x
VI
V,
V,
O+
d
810 80N 808
73 rn CI
v D
828 817 Z 820
845 842
N
851 850 871 864
153
154
k
N
V

DIEGO RD
W NJ
ti
151
133
ti
ti
A I'�
v+
KinIKINN AVE
w
c
N
Vi
N
886
890
916
932
954
ti
976
'0
8 V1
M ichigan A
II
60 L2
L2
851
N
rn
I2
L2
909
MICHIG AN AVE any ue614DIW
M ANZANITA PARK RD 3M N'd9S‘''?
GAETAcr
CI
ti

GLORIA AVE
'a Ave. ,
N
o
rn
1266
1270
1272 1276
1283
1284 1282
1287
LENOgE CT
rn
1344
1349
1)93
I,
m
0 1290
L.) —
1338
1296
Lenore Ct
N w
as ,
135Q 1355 1- 344
CD
1362N 1363 1356 X35.3
--I
1 370 136J rD 1368 1365
6 3 13/3 a? 13/2 13/1
1 3 7, 1 v N
E 1. 377 1.374 H75 r,
(5.
-� 1324
O138? 13/9 ,-
z 1.376
o `... ao. ST 1.383 1.3,-,8
cc p w O
LC:', N4`6. 1380
© 'vim fib
O 1� q ve
-0 1.1.'
CD
0 in
.:>& A
m
'441. 1
S�jty _ 0 1...
14)./ J 7 7
41 S 4
0 142 1416 sio Pkwy
0 1425 J42
0 1434 S
m 1418
14331
0 1436 4.33 143?
1 `^ ii
1439 ( 3 143?
1441 n� 1442 �_1 1 3
O F' Id , 4.38
1443 3 n 1449 -, 144,
144(i 14.
0 1. ,
1265
1269
1273
1289
CI
0 L 110
105
0 w
0 A
108
Q
N 0
w
1447
1449
1452
1454
1451
1453
3(`d 31civaL
H
1442
1451
0 V
FE`S
1258
1262
1268
1214
1280
0 r
N
O
A
01 II
o r. II o
0 CO 0 I IN
O
1419
0 g
0 C'
1432
0 N
1440
1444
1446
71110
w
01 0i
00 6
r
w
1329
NJ
O
I o

BERKSHIRE AVE
r
01 r
40 svfr
45'5
6y°
r
N '0
A
C
s
as
0 Pennsylvania Ave
1330
1342
1350
co
co
7409
1477
VI
V
Cr.
cr, VI
w
V T iIN5?1ti39
i
L 104
141s Q co
1423
1420
1427 p
1428
1431 0

1.135
1434

14.3,
1443 1436.
1445. 1440
147 ORN
CN
405
O
tl
Ir
IN
1101
L2
1051
8 10711
rn
w
0 S
z
m
8 m
UI
V,
VI
A

0. A
0 r
any voiNd219
0 L2
29 any eluenl>Csuuad
any
1 36
?� N '14
w 0
!� w

4.3 A
0 9Z.V1
1432
NJ
1415
1423
1429
1431
1433
1437
v
w
1441
LNN
1s pooMPa21IS GO M032J
r
0 N
1410
1416
1422
1428
1430

LEEDS AVE
I 1438
1442
1446
1448
0 "qve 1450.
?8 22
m
UI
rn
r
u,
L 160
L 159
VI
0 V
w
L2
13 M4GN0LIA-AVE,
VI
'0
650
N
W V1
O
N
•
V
550

EI ID AVE
L5
L •8
01 �I
W
V0
L"245
U,
tID
L8
L 144

BEAUMONT AVE

BEAUMONT AVE
11i`r

ORANGE AVE
di I
I E� 1��
I�� 1[r 1OG f
a' M�'APL�E"AVE
Co NJ ACo
CI
240
750
L 4 853
L4
L4
0 co
PENNSYLVANIA AVE Pennsylvania Ave
moNmouT AVE

0. tz
rc

0. 0
764
L 130
•
01 435
o
rn rn

4.40 111
NJ
171
•
01 •
NJ
01 NJ
0 VI
Taal 681- = uau! 1-
ro
CfCl
LIABILITY STATEMENT The facilities and their depiction on these maps are believed to be reasonably accurate, but the maps are not to be used in lieu of field verification or calling USA at 800-422-4133. NO WARRANTY expressed or implied (including of merchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose) is made as to any matter, including but not limited to, the design, size, type or location of the facilities, their presence or absence, the accuracy of the maps, the means used to transmit the data, absence of viruses (if transmitted electronically, by disk or diskette), data translation or transmission errors or omissions, compatibility with the user's system or as its ability to interpret the data correctly or at all, or any other matter. The Gas Company has no liability for damages (direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or punitive) arising from the transmission, receipt or use by others of the maps or information contained in the maps.

Map Name: 0003-25-2000
Map Type: Gas Asset M ap
Printed By: GTTS
Printed Date:
1/15/2025

l
0,5
3AV 31dVW
J
0I
zlN

MAGNOLIA AVE
1 BEAUMONT AVE (CA -79
J
0 2
W
w

Page 1229 of 1893 ends

FRONTIER
LEGEND

MAPS ARE NOT TO SCAL

CONDUIT FACILITIES

COPPER FACILITIES

PIKER PACILITI ES

PROPOSED FACILITIES

LOT LINES

STREET CENTER LINE

JOINT POLES

ONTIER POLE

Page 1230 of 1893 ends

FRONTIER°
t
N
1 LEGEND *MAPS ARE NOT TO SCALE*

CONDUIT FACILITIES

COPPER FACILITIES

FIRER FACILITIES

PROPOSED FACILITIES

LOT LINES

STREET CENTER LINE

JOINT POLES
O

FRONTIER POLES
CALL 811 FOR LOOK UP
_ E 1ST ST _ _
m
Iz
1zz
D
D
m

Page 1231 of 1893 ends

Pennsylvania Avenue
Map
Beaumont, CA 92223
Red -existing Charter aerial facilities
within project limits.

Green -existing Charter underground
facilities within project limits.
a
G
m
0 75

CALIFORNIA AVE
5 0'®
U
Cpl
296}2
m
250
m
1)
VF1FY
145'
Fg
236'
149
151
E 2ND ST
153
Cd9ar Avenue
VERIFY
170'
170'
ast
rd Street
gey
NA
VERIFY
170'
170'
a,
0 @
4 C
80 42
110
249
VERIFY
155'
East 1st Street
230'
W
O
J
O
W
VERIFY
190'
190'
a
251
85'
N
O
VL
NA
O2
NA.

EUCLID AVE
117'
400'
VERIFY
156'
156'
126
123'
NA
Q
0 37'
�-4
53' .

MAGNOLIA AVE
W

MAGNOLIA
z
E 3RD ST
500'
z
NA
671
VERIFY
550
ED
V
(3,
V
650
VERIFY

ORANGE AVE
VL

BEAUMONT AVE

NO NAME
VL
VL
185
173
161
149
137
125
113
0 East 1st
Street
700
NA
VL
VL
VL
E 3RD ST
VL
1060
East 3rd Street
E 3RD ST
24018
m
z
z
v,
z
5 in
m
01 N
853
24214
VL
•0
tw
VL
VL
'(2
iC
175'
245'

11. O
244}13
186
174
3 D 162
m
m
138
126
102
E 1ST ST
Cf
N
0 m
CO
130'
a)
m
120'
O
O
O
145'
--
st
arty
e
a,
C)
2 a,
D
z
m
co
co
I8
- ---Q--- -- -- -
------- ---
_�7 z 289'
CO
97'

POTRERO BLVD
z
m
z
VL
VL
VL
2ND ST
D
- -------- ------
618'

BECK CT
CO
East 1st Street
10y
Potrero Bou/evard
63 GOR
--- -- --------

Page 1232 of 1893 ends

J MNS
1' Street Widening Feasibility Study

ATTACHMENT F

Page 1233 of 1893 ends

:).) VINE Right of Way Impacts Exhibit
LEGEND

PROPOSED R/W ACQUISITION AREA

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT

EXISTING R/W
APN 418-270-042
APN 418-270-039
3+00 4+00
APN 418-310-007
APN 418-270-032

PROPOSED R/W
EXISTING R/W.

TCE.
i
K r _ APN 418-270-040r'
APN 418-270-031
APN 418-320-011/APN 418-320-012

PLAN VIEW
SCALE: 1'=50' N

TCE AREAS

RIGHT OF WAY AREAS
Description
Quantity
Unit
Subject
Description
Quantity
Unit
Subject
APN 418-260-023
1,125
sf
TCE
APN 418-260-023
2,249
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-260-024
775
sf
TCE
APN 418-260-024
1,549
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-270-031
850
sf
TCE
APN 418-270-031
1,701
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-270-032
1,631
sf
TCE
APN 418-270-032
6,525
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-270-039
469
sf
TCE
APN 418-270-039
938
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-270-040
1,051
sf
TCE
APN 418-270-040
2,102
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
TOTAL TCE AREA = 5,901 sf = 0.14 ac
APN 418-310-007
8,300
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-320-007
3,499
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-320-011,-012
3,802
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY AREA = 30,665 sf = 0.70 ac
13+00
APN 418-260-024
14+00 15+00
APN 418-320-007
APN 418-260-023
1G+00 17+00 y.

Page 1234 of 1893 ends

'>> VINE Right of Way Impacts Exhibit
LEGEND
co
s
O
AI Cr)
00 z
0 PROPOSED R/W ACQUISITION AREA

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT

EXISTING R/W
z
0 19+00 20+00 21+00
APN
418-330-017
APN 418-260-014

PROPOSED R

EXISTING R/W
APN 418-330-018
APN 418-341-007

PLAN VIEW
SCALE: 1'=50' N
C.

TCE AREAS

RIGHT OF WAY AREAS
Description
Quantity
Unit
Subject
Description
Quantity
Unit
Subject
APN 418-330-017
840
sf
TCE
APN 418-250-007
4,349
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-330-018
1,900
sf
TCE
APN 418-250-010
4,019
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-330-020
491
sf
TCE
APN 418-260-013
4,164
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-330-022
419
sf
TCE
APN 418-260-014
4,199
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-330-023
334
sf
TCE
APN 418-330-017
1,679
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-341-007
1,000
sf
TCE
APN 418-330-018
3,799
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-341-030
350
sf
TCE
APN 418-330-020
982
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-341-039
400
sf
TCE
APN 418-330-022
838
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
TOTAL TCE AREA = 5734 sf = 0.13 ac
APN 418-330-023
664
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-341-007
2,000
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-341-009
4,199
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-341-030
700
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
APN 418-341-039
799
sf

R/W ACQUISITION
TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY AREA = 37,391 sf = 0.74 ac
>
J
vest -
a_

Page 1235 of 1893 ends

J MNS
1' Street Widening Feasibility Study

ATTACHMENT G

Page 1236 of 1893 ends

City of Beaumont
MNS Engineers, Inc., Team Resource Fee Estimate
1st Street Widening Imrpovements - Environmental and Final Design Fees

FEES SUBJECT TO CHANGE DURING THE OFFICIAL SCOPE AND FEE

NEGOTIATIONS OF FUTURE PHASES OF THE PROJECT
Principal -In -Charge
Project Manager
Senior Project
Engineer
Associate Engineer
Assistant Engineer
Principal Planner
Associate Planner
Assistant Planner
Task Descriptions
$375
$290
$245
$200
$185
$235
$150
$155
Task A. Project Management
1 . Project Set Up
1 4

2. Field Review
2 2
2 2
2 3.a Kickoff Meeting
1 2
1 1

3.b Monthly Meeting (18)
5 18
36 3.c Additional Meeting (6)
2 6
12 4. QA/QC
8 20

5. Project Schedule
18 6. Monthly Progress Report and Invoice
9 18
Task B. Phase I - Preliminary Design (PA & ED)

1.a 35% Plans
Title Sheet
2 8
General Notes
2 8
16 Typical Sections (1 Sheets)
2 8
16 8
Plan (3 Sheets)
6 24
40 60
Signing and Striping Plans (3 Sheets)
2 8
16 20

1.b Design Standards
2 4

2. Right of Way Requirement Maps
8 15
50 50

4. Hydrology/Hydraulics
4 15
22 32

5. Utility Coordination
3 4
8 20
40 6.SWPPP
4 15
22 32

7. Geotechnical Analysis and Reports
8 30
50 60

8. Environmental. Services
40 120
200
Task C. Phase II - Final Design (65%, 95% & Final)
IF
W

1. Plans
65% Plans Roadway and Drainage (30 Sheets)
20 80
300
500
Construction Details- (2 Sheets)
16 40
40 Signing and Striping and Signals (8 Sheets)
20 40
60 200
Prepare 95% Plans (Update 65% Plans) 40 Sheets
30 80
100
110
Prepare Final Plans (Update 95% Plans) 40 Sheets
15 40
80 100

2. Draft and Final Specifications
8 16
20 3. Cost Estimate (65%, 95% & Final)
Total Staff Hours
Total Staff Costs
4 16
16 Staff Summary
61 323
724
1,042
712
41 122
202
$22,875
$93,670
$177,380
$208,400
$131,720
$9,635
$18,300
$31,310
Fee Exludes the following items: Traffic Analysis, Permits, Right of Way Acquisitions and Appraisals, Utility Relocation Design Task Summary
10 5
59 20
28 18
27 10
26 130
46 6
123
73 75
73 148
360
$58,400 $213,700
$5,800
$7,300
$26,800
$9,500
$1,600
$25,300
$15,200
$15,700
$15,200
$30,800
900 $250 $204,500
96 $22,500
320 $64,600
320
$500
$69,200
235
$500
$49,200
44 36
$250
$12,800
i
$10,100 $432,900
Project Summary
3227
Hours
$1,500
N.G.
$696,000

GRAND TOTAL
N -G-
$696,000

Page 1237 of 1893 ends

J MNS
1' Street Widening Feasibility Study

ATTACHMENT H

Page 1238 of 1893 ends

Feasibility Study Project Estimate
Type of Estimate : Feasibility Study
Project Limits : 1st Street from Beaumont Avenue to Pennsylvania Avenue Project Description: Roadway Widening along 1st Street

SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
Current Year Cost

TOTAL ROADWAY COST

TOTAL STRUCTURES COST
$
$
4,487,500
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 4,487,500
TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY COST $
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS $
4,488,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST
$ 4,490,000

Page 1 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
I. ROADWAY ITEMS SUMMARY
Section Cost
1 Earthwork
2 Pavement Structural Section
3 Drainage
4 Landscape and Irrigation
5 Traffic Items
6 Minor Items
7 Roadway Mobilization
8 Total Roadway Contingency
$ 129,600
$ 1,568,700
$ 562,500
$ 100,000
$ 747,300
$ 155,500
$ 326,400
897,500

TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS
$ 4,487,500
Estimate Prepared By : Hector Salcedo, PE
3/7/2025
Project Manager
Date
Exclusions: This estimate does not include costs for the following items: Support Costs, Right of Way, and Escalation.

Page 1 ends

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SECTION 1: EARTHWORK
Item code
190101 Roadway Excavation
17010X Clearing & Grubbing
Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
CY 1,046 x 100.00 = $ 104,600
LS/ACRE 1 x 25,000.00 = $ 25,000
TOTAL EARTHWORK SECTION ITEMS $ 129,600
SECTION 2: PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION
Item code Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
390132 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A) TON 2,000 x 234.64 = $ 469,280 26020X Class 2 Aggregate Base TON/CY 1,867 x 110.74 = $ 206,752 731516 Minor Concrete (Driveway) CY 43 x 1,473.65 = $ 63,367 731627 Minor Concrete (Curb, Sidewalk, and Curb Ramp) CY 797 x 1,000.00 = $ 797,000 398100 Remove Asphalt Concrete Dike LF 2,473 x 13.04 = $ 32,248 SECTION 3: DRAINAGE
85585.539
TOTAL PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION ITEMS $ 1,568,700
Item code
Catch Basin
65XXXX 24" Reinforced Concrete Pipe
703233 Grouted Rip Rap
721430 Concrete (Headwall)
XXXXXX Parkway Biofiltration System
SECTION 4: ENVIRONMENTAL
5B - LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION
Item code
20XXXX Landscaping System
SECTION 5: TRAFFIC ITEMS
6A - Traffic Electrical
Item code
870200 Lighting System
870400 Signal and Lighting System
6B - Traffic Signing and Striping
Item code
846020 Remove Painted Traffic Stripe
846025 Remove Painted Pavement Marking
820610 Relocate Roadside Sign
84XXXX Permanent Pavement Delineation
Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
EA 5 x 25,000.00 = $ 125,000
LF 300 x 500.00 = $ 150,000
SF 250 x 50.00 = $ 12,500
EA 5 x 15,000.00 = $ 75,000
EA 5 x 40,000.00 = $ 200,000
TOTAL DRAINAGE ITEMS $ 562,500
Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
LS 1 x 100,000.00 = $ 100,000
Subtotal Landscape and Irrigation $ 100,000
TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL $ 100,000
Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
LS 1 x 200,000.00 = $ 200,000
LS 1 x 400,000.00 = $ 400,000
Subtotal Traffic Electrical $ 600,000
Unit Quantity Unit Price ($) Cost
LF 12,734 x 1.50 = $ 19,101
SQFT 1,088 x 2.00 = $ 2,176
EA 26 x 1,000.00 = $ 26,000
LS 1 x 100,000.00 = $ 100,000
Subtotal Traffic Signing and Striping $ 147,277
TOTAL TRAFFIC ITEMS $ 747,300

Page 14 ends

3/7/2025

PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
SUBTOTAL SECTIONS 1 through 7 $ 3,108,100
SECTION 6: MINOR ITEMS
8A - Americans with Disabilities Act Items
ADA Items
8B - Bike Path Items
Bike Path Items
8C - Other Minor Items
Other Minor Items

1.0% $ 31,081

3.0% $ 93,243
Total of Section 1-7 $ 3,108,100 x 5.0%
SECTIONS 7: ROADWAY MOBILIZATION
$ 155,405

TOTAL MINOR ITEMS
$ 155,500
Item code
999990 Total Section 1-8 $ 3,263,600 x 10% = $ 326,360
SECTION 8 : ROADWAY CONTINGENCY*
Risk Amount from Risk Register
Additional or Residual Contingency
Total Section 1-12
(for Known Risks)
(for Unknown/Undefined Risks)
$ 3,590,000 x
TOTAL ROADWAY MOBILIZATION $ 326,400
0%
25%
25%
$897,500
$897,500
TOTAL CONTINGENCY*
$897,500

Page 1 ends

3/7/2025

BEAUMONT

CALIFORNIA
1st Street Feasibility Study
City of Beaumont

Page 1243 of 1893 ends

Agenda
Project Purpose and Need
Existing Conditions
Preliminary Engineering
Environmental Assessment and Funding
Analysis
Cost Estimate and Recommendations

Page 1244 of 1893 ends

Purpose and Need
Purpose: Identify engineering and environmental impacts of widening 1st Street to its ultimate width and scope the future costs of the protect phases, and to provide engineering alternatives where feasible.

Need: 1st Street currently is one lane in each direction and requires widening to accommodate the future land use designations and roadway classifications per the City's general plan.

Page 1245 of 1893 ends

➢ 2 -lane facility with shared left turn lane
➢ Sidewalk gaps
➢ Class II Bike Lanes
Residential and Commercial land uses

Page 1246 of 1893 ends

Preliminary Engineering
➢ General Plan
Consistency
➢ 4 -lane facility with raised median

ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
Proposed Roadways
Freeway
Expressway A
-I- Expressway B
- Urban Arterial Highway
- Arterial Highway {4 Lanes)
Arterial Highway Frontage
- Arterial Highway {2 Lanes)
— Major Highway (Painted Median)
Major Highway (Raised Median)
K♦ Major Frontage
— Downtown Streets
Secondary Streets
p -s -e- Secondary Frontage
Collector Streets (4 Lanes)
Industrial Collector {Painted Median)
Industrial Col lector (Raised Medianl

Page 1247 of 1893 ends

Preliminary engineering
> Existing Drainage
➢ Existing conditions consist of 3 locations of 24"
reinforced concrete pipe crossings. Overside
drains and catch basins are at roadway sag
points.
> Drainage Design
➢ Follow Riverside County Transportation
Department Drainage Guidelines
> 10 -year storm contained below top of curb
> 100 -year storm contained within Right of Way
> Maintain existing drainage patterns
> Proposed 24" reinforced concrete pipe extensions
and new catch basins
> Potential permits from California Department of
Fish & Wildlife (CDFW), Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB), Army Corps of Engineers
(ACOE)
> Potential BMP implementation within the street
parkway.

Page 1248 of 1893 ends

Preliminary Engineering
➢ Utility Impacts
➢ As-Builts requested during study
Utility Type Owner
Potential Impacts
Electrical
Southern California Edison (SCE)
Distribution line poles
Gas
Southern California Gas
High-pressure natural gas pipe
Water
Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water
District (BCVWD)
Fire hydrants, water valves, culvert
crossings
AT&T
No Facilities
Wireless/Communication Frontier (Verizon)
Conduit facilities
Copper facilities
Fiber optic facilities
Charter/Spectrum
Underground and Overhead lines

Page 1249 of 1893 ends

LEGEND
_PAVEMENT WNENNG

SIDEWALK

O LANDSCAPE

EWER LINES

GAS LINES
24' RCA CROSSINGS
� SCE 0H LINES` , P071821AL JURISDICTIONAL WATERS

ABBREVIATIONS
FP. FOGS OF PAVEMENT

SW - SIDEWALK
W. -DAtM LANE

ETW - EDGE OF TRAYEIED WAY

CL - CENTERLNE

FL ROMP&

RW- RIGHT OF WAY

RCP - RENFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
L S • LANDSCAPE
APN 418-270-042

EXISTING S'REET

LKIHI IIIG TORE

RELOCATED TO NEW
SAX WAlA ITV MAE.

FAMINE 24- RCP

EXTENSION
— NEEDED 10 DE
DESIGNED N "no
NEXT P11A T
• $
0 a .

APN 418-310-007
SI'

MAGNOLIA AVENUE
E111
6'
39'
ETV
ETW
u
TWL TL
DIKE
Existing Cross Section
➢ Vertical profile will be
maintained
➢ Rolling terrain with 400'-
550' vertical curves
➢ Longitudinal Grades vary
between 1.0%-6.5%
APN 418-270-039
Exist
RfW
APN 418-270-032

ROADSIDE DITCH FLOWLNE
70 SE GRADED 70 CONVEY
FLOW TO THE €XISTNG
CROSS CULVERTS. DETALS

ANALYSIS AND DOING TORE
SWIM IN TIW .'ENT
PHASE
(SISTINE SCE

TOSTROUTION

MIFS PELF SAND

I NCS TO DC

REI OCATEO SY

OTHERS 'TYPICAL,
APN 418-320-011/418-320-012
APN 418.320-007
100'
PrAlinninrriry FroninchQring
➢ Preliminary Design Layout
APN 418.270.040

PLAN VIEW A
SCALE: 1'=50' N
90'
1 FL
76'
R/t
xlSt
R/1F
6-
6'
LS
SW
C8G
81 ,ETWETW
13 E2W,
S'
6'
BL
$W
C&G
Proposed Section A -A
LS

APLE AVENUE
APN 418-270.031
R/W
80AD5OE DITCI FLOWT.INE

TO SE GRADED TO CONVEY

PLOW TO THE EXISTING
CROSS CULVERI S. MINES

ANALYSIS AND SONG TORE

SIUDINGN THE NEXT
PHASE.

APN 418-260-024
100'
APN 418.260.023 •
EXISTING TWO Pr RCP
EXTENSxN NEEDED.
10 SE 060(8IED IN

THE NEXT PHASE

PALM AVENUE
R/V
Exist Exist
R/11 80. R/V
11' IFL
•
7 FL

6. ID'
6'
6'
5 ETW
2 72'
ETW
13'
C ETV
Its'
T3'
ETW
12' 2'
5'
6'
6'
LS
Si
Bl
R
�jr�Lf�
Y
i
I

8 BL
R
SW
LS
r i
Proposed Section B -B

Page 1250 of 1893 ends

APN 418-330-023

LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS
-PAVEMENT ',ADDEND*
=SIDEWALK
=LANDSCAPE

FIBER LINES

OAS LIDS
20 RCP CROSSINGS

SCE OHEWES
APN 418-250-013
Ep - EDG0 OF PAVEMENT

SW SIDEWALK
BL - BIK0 CALF

ERN - EDGE OF -RAVELED OAT

CL -CENTERLINE
FL - FLIY AJ4E

RIO- RIOHT OF WAY

PCP- EEINFGRGED CONCRETE PIPE
l S - LMNDSCAFE
APN 418-330-017
2 100'
➢ Vertical profile will be
maintained
➢ Rolling terrain with 400'-
550' vertical curves
➢ Longitudinal Grades vary
between 1.0%-6.5%

EXISTING SCE
DATEIM.IT+GN
roles. POLES AND
LINk410 0b

RELOCATED BY
OTHERS ITYPI[;AL,
ROADSIDE DITCH 01001026
TORE 0RA5E0 TO C01YWEN
FLOW TITHE E#ISTNG

CROSS CULVERTS DETAILS
MALES'S AND SUING "O 3.

MIMING IN THE NF. %T
MADE.

APN418-260.014
E1IST1NG STREET

LIGHTING TO BE
RFI r0.0TED TI NEW
8IOEWALKITYPI0'LI
410m-
APN 418-330-018
0/1
LS
5 DO'
L T�, F
6' TYI 15'
I2' ETV 10' ETV 72.'.
12' ETV
E•BL
R Y
Y
BL
r �
tico-c
Proposed Section C -C
CBG�
Exist
RJW
12'
S
S
LS
PrPliminory EnninPPring
➢ Preliminary Design Layout

PLAN VIEW
SCALE: 1'=50° N
APN 418-250-007
2 d
RFW
APN 418-250-010
APN 418.041.009
E%1911NG 1FAEE 34• MCP

EOTENSIONNEEDED TO
FL DESIGNED 04141E
NEXT P0100.
1-x111045 SIGNAL

POLE RELOCATION
R€0DMED
R/40
Exist Exist
RPF Pelf
I
12-
L 7E' F
n2.'
6 S'
5 R Tw 11'
13° ETWET1T!I
IS'
12' El
5'
6'
6"
LS
Sr
BL
E
R

E BL
R
Sw
LS
Coc
Proposed Section D -D
W
d

Page 1251 of 1893 ends

➢ Right of Way Analysis
➢ 0.27 acres of TCC Impacts, 1.44 acres of Right of Way Takes W
W
4 Z
0 w a,
0 6
e
e
a
-1rlE
61 f'. .-.

APN 418-260.013
0 z
a
z
w
4 a_
J
O
o .
4 2
APN 418-310-007

PLAN VIEW
ant
Neon melmonruls
APN 418-330-017
APN 418-270-032
APN 418.260-014
APN 418
APN 418-210-0408
APN 418-320-011IAPN 418-320-012
APN 418-250-007
U>
APN 418-341-007
w
z
w
4 U
J
O.
g
APN 418
260-024
APN 418-320-007
APN 418-250-010
APN 418-341.009
APN 418-260-023
1,..MICI-
W
Z
w
>
4 J
4 0-
L

Page 1252 of 1893 ends

Environmental Assessment
➢ Constraints analyzed
Agricultural Resources
Biological Resources
Hydrology/Flood Zones
Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands
Land Use/Zoning
Paleontological Resources
Technical Studies
Plant/Wildlife Surveys
Regulatory Permitting
DBESP (Determination of
Biologically Equivalent or Superior
Preservation)
➢ Expected Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration (Is/MND)
➢ Aesthetics
➢ Agricultural and Forestry Resources
➢ Air Quality
➢ Biological Resources
➢ Cultural Resources
➢ Energy
➢ Geology/Soils
➢ Greenhouse Gas Emissions
➢ Hazards/Hazardous Materials
➢ Hydrology/Water Quality
➢ Land Use/Planning
➢ Mineral Resources
➢ Noise
➢ Population/Housing
➢ Public Services
➢ Recreation
➢ Transportation/Traffic
➢ Utility/Service Systems
➢ Wildfire

Page 1253 of 1893 ends

Cost Estimate
➢ Environmental Clearance and Design (Ps&E)
ee
Project Management
Meetings, Schedule, Contract
$50,000
Preliminary Design
(30% Concept Approval)
Alternative Screening and Selection
$50,000
Environmental Clearance (CEQA i
Technical Studies, Environmental Document
$60,000
Utility Coordination and Relocations
Utility Letters, Utility Relocation Coordination
$15,000
Drainage Analysis and Reports
Hydraulics and Hydrology Analysis, Drainage Report
$30,000
Geotechnical Analysis and Reports
Geotech Explorations and Report
$30,000
Right of Way Coordination
Right of Way Requirement Maps
$25,000
60% PS&E
_ Plans, Specifications and Estimate
$290,000
95% PS&E
_ Plans, Specifications and Estimate
$80,000
100% PS&E
Plans, Specifications and Estimate
$55,000
RE File & Bid Support
As-Builts
$15,000
TOTAL*
$700,000
* Note: Total Fee does not include Right of Way Acquisitions or Appraisals. Engineers estimate does not include support costs, these costs can be determined during the next phase of the project. Depending on the project schedule and timeline of when the City will plan to construct the project, escalation will need to be factored into the price shown in this estimate.

Page 1254 of 1893 ends

Cost Estimate
➢ Preliminary Engineers Estimate
Roadway
Roadway Ex, Pavement, Concrete, C&G, Sidewalk, Curb Ramps $1,698,300
Traffic
Signing and Striping, Signal Mods, Electrical/Lighting
$745,000
Temporary Traffic Control
Temporary barriers, signage
Drainage
Pipe, Catch Basins, Overside Drains, BMP's
$562,500
Landscaping
Hardscaping, Planting
$100,000
Miscellaneous
Relocation of fences, gates, removals, and minor items
$155,500
Mobilization
10%
$326,400
Contingency
25%
$897,500
TOTAL*
$4,487,500
* Note: Total Fee does not include Right of Way Acquisitions or Appraisals. Engineers estimate does not include support costs, these costs can be determined during the next phase of the project. Depending on the project schedule and timeline of when the City will plan to construct the project, escalation will need to be factored into the price shown in this estimate.

Page 1255 of 1893 ends

Funding Analysis
State and Regional Grant Program Details Table
Grant Information
State Grants
Regional Grants
SB 1 Local Partnership Program
(LPP)
Regional Arterials Call for Projects
Funding Agency
California Transportation Commission
(CTC)
Riverside County Transportation
Commission (RCTC)
Minimum/Maximum
Grant
None
Max 10% of available funding
Local Match
50%
0%-50%
Eligibility Constraints
Must have voter -approved
transportation tax or fee
Construction -ready priority
NOFO Release Date
(P) = Projected
August 2026 (P)
TBD
Application Due Date
(P) = Projected
November 2026 (P)
TBD

Page 1256 of 1893 ends

Recommendation/Next Steps
Recommendations

1. Advance to Environmental Phase

2. Conduct Required Surveys and Permitting

3. Refine Preliminary Design

4. Initiate Right -of -Way Planning

5. Coordinate with Utility Providers

6. Pursue Funding Opportunities

7. On -Going Updates to Cost Estimates and
Schedule
Next Steps
➢ Prepare Traffic Analysis
➢ Perform Environmental Technical Studies and Establish Environmental Footprint
➢ Develop Geometric Design to 30%, Upon Approval
Continue to PS&E 60%, 90%, and 100%
➢ Conduct Geotechnical Investigations and Analysis
➢ Prepare Right of Way Maps
➢ Continue Utility Coordination
➢ Determine Vehicle Miles Traveled Impacts and
mitigation strategies (Critical Path Item)

Page 1257 of 1893 ends

Questions and Answers
�J MNS
•

Page 1258 of 1893 ends

BEAUMONTA -C A L I F O R N -
Staff Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Robert L. Vestal, Public Works Director
Dustin Christensen, Principal Engineer
DATE: September 2, 2025
SUBJECT: GHD, Inc. Professional Service Agreement — Capital Improvement Project (CIP) No. R25-15 (Contract No. C25-120)
Description: Award a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to GHD, Inc. for the Preliminary Design Report (PDR) for the Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Project (Project).

Background and Analysis:

On September 17, 2024, the City Council adopted the Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan (DBRP) prepared by GHD, Inc., which included proposed new design features to enhance the downtown area. These features included angle and parallel parking, raised center medians on Beaumont Avenue and 6th Street, decorative crosswalks, roundabouts, and designated parking lots.

On March 28, 2025, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) inviting qualified firms to submit proposals for the preparation of a comprehensive PDR for the Downtown Beaumont Revitalization. The Preliminary Design effort includes both the preliminary design report and 30% level preliminary design plans and specifications.

On May 13, 2025, the City received a single proposal in response to its request for professional services to prepare the PDR. The proposal was submitted by GHD, Inc., a firm with a strong track record in revitalization projects for other cities. GHD is familiar with the proposed project and completed the previous planning document that was adopted by the City.

The Scope of the proposed design effort includes the following:
• Investigations
o Survey and Centerline Control
o Right -of -Way Analysis
o Utility Research and Potholing

Page 1259 of 1893 ends

o Geotechnical Investigation
o Hydrological/Drainage Analysis
o Traffic Studies and Assessments
o Street and Pedestrian Lighting Analysis
o Tree Impact Analysis
• Design Options
o Renderings, exhibits, color boards, etc. for public presentations • Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
o Introduction
o Project Features and Design Criteria
o Preliminary Design (30%)
■ Street Improvement Plans
■ Sidewalk, Pedestrian, and ADA Plans
■ Intersection Signalization Plans
■ Street and Pedestrian Lighting Plans
■ Signing and Striping Plans (Bike Lanes)
■ Landscaping and Irrigation Plans
• Utility Plans (Existing, Proposed, and Relocation)
• Street Furniture Plans
• Monument and Overhead Sign Plans
• Wayfinding Signage Plans
o Preliminary Design Specifications
o Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates
o Statement of Limitations
o Reports and Studies
• Survey and Boundary Control Technical Memorandum
■ Right -of -Way Technical Memorandum
• Utility Research and Potholing Technical Memorandum
• Geotechnical Report
• Hydrology Report
• Traffic Studies and Analysis
• Lighting Analysis Technical Memorandum
■ Tree Impact Analysis Technical Memorandum
• Environmental Services
The proposed design effort will complete the preliminary design for the project. This phase is designed to inform future decisions and establish the groundwork for the

Page 1260 of 1893 ends

detailed final design phase, environmental review, bidding, and construction of the final project. The Project limits are shown in the following figure:

On August 19, 2025, City Staff presented an update on what this DBRP includes while confirming some of these proposed features.

Given this prior engagement and GHD's familiarity with the community's goals, challenges, and opportunities, City Staff recommends moving forward with the firm to prepare the PDR. For reference and transparency, the full proposal from GHD, Inc. has been included as Attachment A to this report.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost to prepare this staff report is estimated to be $350.

Funding for this Project is provided by CIP R-25-15 Downtown Revitalization Feasibility Study (Project). The following is a summary of the funding and budget for the project:

Page 1261 of 1893 ends

CIP R-25-15 Downtown Revitalization Feasibility Study Project Funding Summary
Estimated Total Project Budget= $1,600,000
Current Project Budget= $1,600,000
CIP R-25-15 Downtown Revitalization Feasibility Study Project Budget Summary
Project
Component
Est. Total
Budget
Current
Budget
Paid to
Date
Remaining
Budget
Project Management
Preliminary Services
Environmental
Design
$1,600,000 $1,600,000
Permits
Right -of -Way
Construction
Construction Management
Equipment
(Total
$1,600,000
$1,600,000
$-

Page 1262 of 1893 ends

Recommended Action:

Approve the agreement with GHD, Inc. for the preparation of a PDR, for the period of September 2, 2025, through September 2, 2030, in an amount not to exceed $1,483,634;
Approve the contingency of $116,366 for a total not -to -exceed of $1,600,000 and authorize the City Manager to sign off on any preceding amendments or purchase change orders within the authorized contingency amount; and, Authorize the issuance of a purchase order to GHD, Inc. in the amount of $1,483,634 for the preparation of a PDR.

Attachments:

A. Professional Services Agreement — GHD, Inc.

B. Levine Act Statement — GHD, Inc.

Page 1263 of 1893 ends

City of Beaumont Agreement #
C25-120

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR is made and effective as of the 2nd day of September 2025, by and between the CITY OF BEAUMONT ("CITY") whose address is 550 E. 6th Street, Beaumont, California 92223 and GHD, INC. ("CONTRACTOR"), whose address is 320 Goddard Avenue, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618.

RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into on the basis of the following facts, understandings and intentions of the parties to this Agreement:

A. The CITY Public Works Department desires to engage CONTRACTOR to provide Professional Design Services for the Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Preliminary Design Project (CIP R25-15);
B. The CITY published a Request for Proposals, using the formal RFP procedures, on March 28, 2025; The Request for Proposals (RFP) is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; C. The CONTRACTOR responded to the Request on May 13, 2025; CONTRACTOR has made a proposal ("Proposal") to the CITY to provide such professional services, which Proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference; and, D. The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide such services pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and represents and warrants to CITY that CONTRACTOR possesses the necessary skills, licenses, certifications, qualifications, personnel and equipment to provide such services.

E. The CITY desires to engage CONTRACTOR to provide the services provided in the Proposal.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and mutual covenants contained herein, CITY and CONTRACTOR agree as follows:

1. Term of Agreement. This Agreement is effective as of the date first above written and shall continue until terminated as provided for herein. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement shall automatically terminate after five (5) years unless extended by the parties with the approval of the City Council of the CITY.

2. Services to be Performed. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide the services ("Services") as follows: Proposal per Exhibit "B". All Services shall be performed in the manner and according to the timeframe set forth in the Proposal. CONTRACTOR designates Todd Tregenza, AICP as CONTRACTOR'S professional(s) responsible for overseeing the Services

Page 1264 of 1893 ends

City of Beaumont Agreement #
C25-120
provided by CONTRACTOR.

3. Associates and Subcontractors. CONTRACTOR may, at CONTRACTOR's sole cost and expense, employ such competent and qualified independent associates, subcontractors and consultants as CONTRACTOR deems necessary to perform the Services; provided, however, that CONTRACTOR shall not subcontract any of the Services without the written consent of CITY.

4. Compensation.

4.01 CONTRACTOR shall be paid at the rates set forth in the Cost Proposal and shall not increase any rate without the prior written consent of the CITY. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, total fees and charges paid by CITY to CONTRACTOR under this Agreement shall not exceed One Million Four Hundred Eighty -Three Thousand Six Hundred Thirty -Four Dollars ($1,483,634).

4.02 CONTRACTOR shall not be compensated for any Services rendered nor reimbursed for any expenses incurred in excess of those authorized unless approved in advance by the CITY, in writing.

4.03 CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, on or before the fifteenth (15th) of each month, itemized invoices for the Services rendered in the previous month. The CITY shall not be obligated to pay any invoice that is submitted more than sixty (60) days after the due date of such invoice. CITY shall have the right to review and audit all invoices prior to or after payment to CONTRACTOR. This review and audit may include, but not be limited to CITY's:
a. Determination that any hourly fee charged is consistent with this Agreement's approved hourly rate schedule;
b. Determination that the multiplication of the hours billed times the approved rate schedule dollars is correct;
c. Determination that each item charged is the usual, customary, and reasonable charge for the particular item. If CITY determines an item charged is greater than usual, customary, or reasonable, or is duplicative, ambiguous, excessive, or inappropriate, CITY shall either return the bill to CONTRACTOR with a request for explanation or adjust the payment accordingly, and give notice to CONTRACTOR of the adjustment.

4.04 CONTRACTOR shall receive payment by the CITY for the services provided specified in Exhibit "B".
a. CONTRACTOR shall submit all invoices to the City of Beaumont's Accounts Payable at the email address listed below.
b. CONTRACTOR will send the original invoices to:

Page 12 ends

City of Beaumont Agreement #
C25-120
City of Beaumont
Attn: Finance Department -Accounts Payable
[email protected]
c. Each invoice shall contain a minimum of the following information:
invoice number and date; PO number (once issued by the CITY), remittance address; bill -to and ship -to addresses of ordering department/division; Agreement number (24-157), quantities; item descriptions, unit prices, extensions, sales/use tax if applicable, an invoice total, and any other information requested by the CITY.

4.05 If the work is satisfactorily completed, CITY shall pay such invoice within thirty (30) days of its receipt. Should CITY dispute any portion of any invoice, CITY shall pay the undisputed portion within the time stated above, and at the same time advise CONTRACTOR in writing of the disputed portion.

5. Obligations of CONTRACTOR.

5.01 CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all Services in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Proposal. In the event that the terms of the Proposal shall conflict with the terms of this Agreement, or contain additional terms other than the Services to be rendered and the price for the Services, the terms of this Agreement shall govern and said additional or conflicting terms shall be of no force or effect.

5.02 Except as otherwise agreed by the parties, CONTRACTOR will supply all personnel, materials and equipment required to perform the Services. CONTRACTOR shall provide its own offices, telephones, vehicles and computers and set its own work hours. CONTRACTOR will determine the method, details, and means of performing the Services under this Agreement.

5.03 CONTRACTOR shall keep CITY informed as to the progress of the Services by means of regular and frequent consultations. Additionally, when requested by CITY, CONTRACTOR shall prepare written status reports.

5.04 CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying, when due, all income and other taxes, fees and withholding, including withholding state and federal taxes, social security, unemployment and worker's compensation, incurred as a result of the compensation paid under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY for any claims, costs, losses, fees, penalties, interest, or damages suffered by CITY resulting from CONTRACTOR's failure to comply with this provision.

5.05 In the event CONTRACTOR is required to prepare plans, drawings, specifications and/or estimates, the same shall be furnished in conformance with local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.

5.06 CONTRACTOR represents that it possesses all required licenses necessary or applicable to the performance of Services under this Agreement and the Proposal and

Page 1266 of 1893 ends

City of Beaumont Agreement #
C25-120
shall obtain and keep in full force and effect all permits and approvals required to perform the Services herein. In the event CITY is required to obtain an approval or permit from another governmental entity, CONTRACTOR shall provide all necessary supporting documents to be filed with such entity.

5.07 CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for obtaining Employment Eligibility Verification information from CONTRACTOR's employees, in compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-603 (8 U.S.C. 1324a), and shall ensure that CONTRACTOR's employees are eligible to work in the United States.

5.08 In the event that CONTRACTOR employs, contracts with, or otherwise utilizes any Ca1PERS retirees in completing any of the Services performed hereunder, such instances shall be disclosed in advance to the CITY and shall be subject to the CITY's advance written approval.

5.09 Drug -free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the CONTRACTOR will comply with the requirements of the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code, Section 8350 et seq.) and will provide a drug - free workplace.

5.10 CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules, regulations, entitlements and/or permits applicable to, or governing the Services authorized hereunder.

6. Insurance. CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to be solely responsible for the health and safety of its employees and agents in performing the Services under this Agreement and shall comply with all laws applicable to worker safety including but not limited to Cal -OSHA.

Therefore, throughout the duration of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR hereby covenants and agrees to maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Attached hereto as Exhibit "C" are copies of Certificates of Insurance and endorsements as required by Section 7.02. If existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, CONTRACTOR agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so.

CONTRACTOR shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance:

6.01 Commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate; CONTRACTOR agrees to have its insurer endorse the general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insured's CITY, its officials, employees and agents. CONTRACTOR also agrees to require all contractors and subcontractors to provide the same coverage required under this Section 6.

6.02 Business Auto Coverage in an amount no less than $1 million per accident.

If CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR's employees will use personal autos in performance of the Services hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person.

Page 12647 of 1893 ends

City of Beaumont Agreement #
C25-120

6.03 Workers' Compensation coverage for any of CONTRACTOR's employees that will be providing any Services hereunder. CONTRACTOR will have a state -approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by California law. The provisions of any workers' compensation will not limit the obligations of CONTRACTOR under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to CITY, its employees, officials and agents.

6.04 Optional Insurance Coverage. Choose and check one: Required _ /Not Required ; Errors and omissions insurance in a minimum amount of $2 million per occurrence to cover any negligent acts or omissions committed by CONTRACTOR, its employees and/or agents in the performance of any Services for CITY.

7. General Conditions pertaining to Insurance Coverage

7.01 No liability insurance coverage provided shall prohibit CONTRACTOR from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. CONTRACTOR waives all rights of subrogation against CITY regardless of the applicability of insurance proceeds and shall require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise.

7.02. Prior to beginning the Services under this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall furnish CITY with certificates of insurance, endorsements, and upon request, complete copies of all policies, including complete copies of all endorsements. All copies of policies and endorsements shall show the signature of a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf.

7.03. All required policies shall be issued by a highly rated insurer with a minimum A.M. Best rating of "A:VII"). The insurer(s) shall be admitted and licensed to do business in California. The certificates of insurance hereunder shall state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice has been given to CITY.

7.04 Self-insurance does not comply with these insurance specifications.

CONTRACTOR acknowledges and agrees that that all insurance coverage required to be provided by CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor, shall apply first and on a primary, non- contributing basis in relation to any other insurance, indemnity or self-insurance available to CITY.

7.05 All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by CITY, as the need arises. CONTRACTOR shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect CITY's protection without CITY's prior written consent.

7.06 CONTRACTOR agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against CONTRACTOR or arising out of the Services performed under this Agreement. CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but

Page 12658 of 1893 ends

City of Beaumont Agreement #
C25-120
not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY.

8. Indemnification.

8.01 CONTRACTOR and CITY agree that CITY, its employees, agents and officials should, to the extent permitted by law, be fully protected from any loss, injury, damage, claim, lawsuit, cost, expense, attorneys' fees, litigation costs, defense costs, court costs or any other costs arising out of or in any way related to the performance of this Agreement by CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor or agent of either as set forth herein.

Accordingly, the provisions of this indemnity are intended by the parties to be interpreted and construed to provide the fullest protection possible under the law to CITY.

CONTRACTOR acknowledges that CITY would not enter into this Agreement in the absence of the commitment of CONTRACTOR to indemnify and protect CITY as set forth herein.
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its employees, agents and officials, from any liability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses, damages or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, actual attorneys' fees incurred by CITY, court costs, interest, defense costs, including expert witness fees and any other costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever without restriction or limitation incurred in relation to, as a consequence of or arising out of, or in any way attributable actually, allegedly or impliedly, in whole or in part to the performance of this Agreement.

CONTRACTOR's obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall include any and all claims, suits and proceedings in which CONTRACTOR (and/or CONTRACTOR's agents and/or employees) is alleged to be an employee of CITY.

All obligations under this provision are to be paid by CONTRACTOR as they are incurred by CITY.
b. Without affecting the rights of CITY under any provision of this Agreement or this Section, CONTRACTOR shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless CITY as set forth above for liability attributable solely to the fault of CITY, provided such fault is determined by agreement between the parties or the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction.
8A. Indemnification Design Professionals.
8A.01 In the event that CONTRACTOR is a design professional under California Civil Code Section 2782.8 this Section 8A shall apply instead of Section 8. To the fullest extent permitted by California law and in accordance with California Civil Code section 2782.8, CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, trustees and members ("Indemnified Parties") from any and all actions, assessments, counts, citations, claims, costs, damages, demands, judgments, liabilities (legal, administrative or otherwise), losses, notices, expenses, fines, penalties, proceedings, responsibilities, violations, attorney's and consultants' fees and causes of action including, but not limited to those for, injury to property or persons, including personal injury and/or death ("Claim(s)"), to the extent that the Claim(s) arises out of,

Page 12 ends

of 1893

City of Beaumont Agreement #
C25-120
pertains to, or relates to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONTRACTOR, its directors, officials, officers, employees and consultants arising out of, connected with, or resulting from the performance of the Services, the Project, or this Agreement. This indemnity excludes liability caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnified Parties.

The cost to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend charged to CONTRACTOR shall not exceed CONTRACTOR'S proportionate percentage of fault.

9. Additional Services, Changes and Deletions.

9.01 In the event CONTRACTOR performs additional or different services than those described herein without the prior written approval of the City Manager and/or City Council of CITY, CONTRACTOR shall not be compensated for such services.

CONTRACTOR expressly waives any right to be compensated for services and materials not covered by the scope of this Agreement or authorized by the CITY in writing.

9.02 CONTRACTOR shall promptly advise the City Manager and Finance Director of CITY as soon as reasonably practicable upon gaining knowledge of a condition, event or accumulation of events which may affect the scope and/or cost of Services. All proposed changes, modifications, deletions and/or requests for additional services shall be reduced to writing for review and approval by the CITY and/or City Council.

10. Termination of Agreement.

10.01 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, CITY, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement with or without cause, or for no cause, at any time by giving twenty (20) days' written notice to CONTRACTOR.

10.02 In the event of termination, the payment of monies due CONTRACTOR for undisputed Services performed prior to the effective date of such termination shall be paid within thirty (30) business days after receipt of an invoice as provided in this Agreement.

Immediately upon termination, CONTRACTOR agrees to promptly provide and deliver to CITY all original documents, reports, studies, plans, specifications and the like which are in the possession or control of CONTRACTOR and pertain to CITY.

11. Status of CONTRACTOR.

11.01 CONTRACTOR shall perform the Services in CONTRACTOR's own way as an independent contractor, and in pursuit of CONTRACTOR's independent calling, and not as an employee of CITY. However, CONTRACTOR shall regularly confer with CITY's City Manager as provided for in this Agreement.

11.02 CONTRACTOR agrees that it is not entitled to the rights and benefits afforded to CITY's employees, including disability or unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, retirement, Ca1PERS, medical insurance, sick leave, or any other employment benefit. CONTRACTOR is responsible for providing, at its own expense, disability, unemployment, workers' compensation and other insurance, training, permits,

Page 1270 of 1893 ends

City of Beaumont Agreement #
C25-120
and licenses for itself and its employees and subcontractors.

11.03 CONTRACTOR hereby specifically represents and warrants to CITY that it possesses the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the Services under this Agreement in a competent, professional manner, without the advice or direction of CITY and that the Services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standards customarily applicable to an experienced and competent professional rendering the same or similar services in the same geographic area where the CITY is located. Further, CONTRACTOR represents and warrants that the individual signing this Agreement on behalf of CONTRACTOR has the full authority to bind CONTRACTOR to this Agreement.

12. Ownership of Documents; Audit.

12.01 All draft and final reports, plans, drawings, studies, maps, photographs, specifications, data, notes, manuals, warranties and all other documents of any kind or nature prepared, developed or obtained by CONTRACTOR in connection with the performance of Services performed for the CITY shall become the sole property of CITY, and CONTRACTOR shall promptly deliver all such materials to CITY upon request. At the CITY's sole discretion, CONTRACTOR may be permitted to retain original documents, and furnish reproductions to CITY upon request, at no cost to CITY.

12.02 Subject to applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, CITY shall hold all intellectual property rights to any materials developed pursuant to this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall not such use data or documents for purposes other than the performance of this Agreement, nor shall CONTRACTOR release, reproduce, distribute, publish, adapt for future use or any other purposes, or otherwise use, any data or other materials first produced in the performance of this Agreement, nor authorize others to do so, without the prior written consent of CITY.

12.03 CONTRACTOR shall retain and maintain, for a period not less than four years following termination of this Agreement, all-time records, accounting records and vouchers and all other records with respect to all matters concerning Services performed, compensation paid and expenses reimbursed. At any time during normal business hours and as often as CITY may deem necessary, CONTRACTOR shall make available to CITY's agents for examination all of such records and shall permit CITY's agents to audit, examine and reproduce such records.

13. Miscellaneous Provisions.

13.01 This Agreement, which includes all attached exhibits, supersedes any and all previous agreements, either oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the rendering of Services by CONTRACTOR for CITY and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of such Services in any manner whatsoever. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by both parties.

13.02 CONTRACTOR shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights or interest

Page 12 ends

City of Beaumont Agreement #
C25-120
in this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement.

13.03 CONTRACTOR shall timely file FPPC Form 700 Conflict of Interest Statements with CITY if required by California law and/or the CITY's conflict of interest policy.

13.04 If any legal action or proceeding, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.

13.05 This Agreement is made, entered into and shall be performed in the County of Riverside in the State of California and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced and governed under the laws of the State of California. The parties agree that venue in any litigation between them shall be in Riverside County, California.

13.06 CONTRACTOR covenants that neither it nor any officer or principal of its firm has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, either directly or indirectly, which will conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of their Services hereunder.

CONTRACTOR further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor.

13.07 CONTRACTOR has read and is aware of the provisions of Section 1090 et seq. and Section 87100 et seq. of the Government Code relating to conflicts of interest of public officers and employees. CONTRACTOR agrees that they are unaware of any financial or economic interest of any public officer or employee of the CITY relating to this Agreement. It is further understood and agreed that if such a financial interest does exist at the inception of this Agreement, the CITY may immediately terminate this Agreement by giving notice thereof. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the requirements of Government Code section 87100 et seq. and section 1090 in the performance of and during the term of this Agreement.

13.08 Improper Consideration. CONTRACTOR shall not offer (either directly or through an intermediary) any improper consideration such as, but not limited to, cash, discounts, services, the provision of travel or entertainment, or any items of value to any officer, employee or agent of the CITY in an attempt to secure favorable treatment regarding this Agreement or any contract awarded by CITY. The CITY, by notice, may immediately terminate this Agreement if it determines that any improper consideration as described in the preceding sentence was offered to any officer, employee or agent of the CITY with respect to the proposal and award process of this Agreement or any CITY contract. This prohibition shall apply to any amendment, extension or evaluation process once this Agreement or any CITY contract has been awarded. CONTRACTOR shall immediately report any attempt by any CITY officer, employee or agent to solicit (either directly or through an intermediary) improper consideration from CONTRACTOR.

Page 12 ends

City of Beaumont Agreement #
C25-120

13.09 Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the entire balance of this Agreement not so affected shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have made and executed this Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first above written.

CITY:

CITY OF BEAUMONT
By:

Mike Lara, Mayor
Date:

ATTEST:

By:

Nicole Wheelwright, Deputy City Clerk
Date:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

John O. Pinkney, City Attorney
Date:

CONTRACTOR:

GHD, INC.

By:

Print Name: To + d T, egenza
Title: Principal _
Date: 8/28/2025

Page 12 ends

City of Beaumont Agreement #
C25-120
EXHIBIT "A"

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
(insert behind this page)

Page 1274 of 1893 ends

BEAUMONT
C A L I F 0 R N I A
Website:
www.beaumontca.gov
Address:
550 E. 6th Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
Phone:
951.769.8520
Request for Proposal
for
Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
for the
Downtown Beaumont Revitalization
Item
Dates
Questions in by:

April 18, 2025, 12:00 p.m. PST
Answers posted by:

April 24, 2025, 12:00 p.m. PST
Proposals due by:

May 13, 2025, 3:00 p.m. PST
Contact:

Raveena Chara
Procurement & Contracts Specialist
[email protected]
RFP Available
City of Beaumont Planet Bids portal:
https://vendors.planetbids.com/portal/66785/bo/bo-search

Page 12715 of 1893 ends

The City of Beaumont (City) is seeking proposals from qualified firms and individuals (Consultants) interested in preparing the Preliminary Design Report (PDR) for the City's Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan (boundaries shown in Red below). The PDR will provide a high-level overview of the proposed Downtown Beaumont Revitalization project and its design approach before moving into detailed engineering phases. A PDR typically includes a project overview, design objectives, site analysis, conceptual design descriptions, system breakdowns, key technical specifications, preliminary cost estimates, schedule timelines, risk assessments, environmental considerations, and a discussion of potential design alternatives. &:aLrwret A
._ w eth Si a �E Su, r,
v �4 I
v`
"dp �.1..— --1 ;In ',t. J
J.,
\ �'7C
1 f
c
XYS �? E 6th St
\, N\`S't`'
ti. ``sue
•`''tea —��+� — --..,.—
W 4th St Lug: FStrada Rd ,
Chaa!iiut Arc
UOMnIOrrn Ale° t'Iiln t6ener81 Nldn CIUDI!•r 1 . Houn1are - l?OwntOwf ReYIta11Ia1Art Plan Rourrd.3..,
All services provided by the Consultant shall be performed by individuals who meet the qualifications, education, and certification/licensing requirements for the position. The successful Consultant shall also have the resources to provide cost-effective and timely services, including providing customer service to the City.

Qualified firms that submit a proposal will be evaluated in accordance with the requirements defined within this RFP. Upon successful negotiations with the City, the selected firm will provide professional engineering services as described in the scope of this RFP.

Page 12 ends

The City of Beaumont was incorporated in November 1912. The City is located in the western portion of Riverside County and is bounded on the west by Calimesa and unincorporated areas, on the north by the unincorporated County areas (Cherry Valley), on the south by unincorporated County areas, and the City of San Jacinto, and on the east by the City of Banning. The land area within the City's boundaries is approximately 26 square miles.

The City interacts with other government agencies, including but not limited to the California Department of Transportation, the County of Riverside, RCTC, and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board.

The City is seeking proposals from qualified Consultants to prepare a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) for the Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan. The PDR shall include, but is not limited to, engineering research, surveying, preparation of assessments, studies, reports, exhibits, preliminary plans, and environmental determination needed to complete the PDR and advancement into Final Design.

The Scope of Services for a Preliminary Design Report for the Downtown Revitalization Feasibility Study is attached as Exhibit A.

Additional Responsibilities
The Consultant shall be responsible for completing the specified services in accordance with the City's Professional Services Agreement (PSA) by Independent Contractor, a sample of which is attached (Exhibit B).

The term of the Professional Services Agreement shall be determined upon the need for services and consistent with the City's policies. The initial period of the contract is three (3) years, with two one-year extensions as approved by the City Council, subject to agreement terms and the Beaumont Municipal Code.

Proposals shall clearly address all the information requested and describe the methodology to be used to accomplish each of the project tasks. Please note: this RFP cannot identify each specific, individual task required to successfully and completely implement this project. The City relies on the professionalism and competence of the selected firm to be knowledgeable of the general areas identified in the scope of services. The City will not approve an addendum to the selected firm's agreement which do not involve a substantial change from the general scope of work identified in this RFP.

Page 12 ends

The proposal shall clearly address all the information requested herein. To achieve a uniform review process and obtain the maximum degree of comparability, it is required that proposals be organized and contain all information as specified below. Proposers shall submit one copy of the proposal and one copy of the cost proposal on the Planetbids portal, both proposals will need to be submitted separately.

A. Cover Letter: Maximum of two (2) pages serving as an Executive Summary which shall include an understanding of the scope of services. The RFP shall be transmitted with a cover letter that must be signed by an official authorized to bind the consultant contractually. That letter accompanying the RFP shall also provide the name, title, address, and telephone number of individuals with the authority to negotiate and contractually bind the consultant. The cover letter constitutes certification by the consultant, under penalty of perjury, that the consultant complies with nondiscrimination requirements of the State and Federal Government. An unsigned proposal or one signed by an individual unauthorized to bind the consultant may be rejected.

B. Introduction/Information: Introduction of the service proposal, including a statement of understanding for the types of services contemplated shall be a maximum of two (2) pages. Any participating firms and proposed sub -consultants shall be identified and included in the proposal (all sub -consultants must be approved by the City prior to signing the agreement with City).

C. Firm Profile: The Firm Profile shall be a maximum of five (5) pages. Provide a description of the firm, including number of professional personnel, years in business, office location(s), organizational structure (e.g., corporation, partnership, sole practitioner, etc.), areas of particular expertise, etc. Location of the principal office that will be responsible for the implementation of this contract.

In addition, any participating firms and proposed subcontractors shall be identified and included in the proposal (all subcontractors must be approved by the City prior to signing the agreement with the City).

D. Key Personnel: The Key Personnel shall be a maximum of two (2) pages. Provide a summary description of the key personnel who will be involved in this project, their roles and responsibilities, and their experience in similar, past projects. The proposal must name a project manager. In addition to this summary, full resumes should be provided.

E. Scope of Services: Provide a description of the tasks, sub -tasks, and deliverables that will be provided, in a maximum of ten (10) pages. The scope of work should be presented in logical format that can be easily attached to the Professional Services Agreement. Any additional items not mentioned in Exhibit A (Scope of Services) required to obtain final approval, shall be included in the proposal as additional items for consideration. The fully recommended Scope of Services should be presented as an attachment to the proposal and shall be in a logical format that can be easily attached to the Professional Services Agreement (Exhibit B). Provide a discussion on how the objectives of the Scope of Services will be accomplished.

Page 12748 of 1893 ends

F. Approach: The proposal should set forth a detailed work plan, including an explanation of the methodology and process for providing the services required in this RFP. Detailed project schedule, identifying all tasks and deliverables to be performed, durations for each task, and overall time of completion. The firm's approach to delivering the scope of services shall be a maximum of six (6) pages. Describe the firm's approach to communicating effectively with City staff and officials, other jurisdictional stakeholders, and the public, to facilitate successful delivery of assigned tasks.

G. Additional Information: The Additional Information section shall be a maximum of two (2) pages. Any other information that should be considered, such as any special services or customer service philosophy, which defines your firm's practice.

H. References: The References section shall be a maximum of three (3) pages. Six to nine references including name, address, contact person, and phone number of the company, length of time services were provided, and a description of the services provided.

I. Resumes: The Resume section of the proposal shall not exceed thirteen (13) pages.

Provide professional resumes for the key personnel and sub -consultants assigned to the project.

J. Cost proposal (including hourly rates) must be submitted in a separate sealed envelope.

The separate Cost Proposal is not included as part of the page count for the proposal.

K. The firm will be required to maintain an active City of Beaumont Business License and professional liability insurance including liability at a minimum of one million per occurrence, worker's compensation, and vehicle coverage including comprehensive and collision insurance naming the City of Beaumont as additional insured. The proposal shall state whether such insurances will be in force at the time of contract execution.

All questions or requests for clarifications (RFC) regarding this RFP shall be submitted on Planetbids by April 18, 2025, 12:00 p.m. No RFC or questions will be accepted after 12:00 p.m. on April 18, 2025. Responses to all questions will be posted on the City's Planetbids portal to allow all users to review the City's responses to all questions within one (1) week of the question's due date.

Submit one (1) digital color copy of proposal and one (1) digital copy of the cost proposal in PDF format on Planetbids in accordance with the bid submission deadline of May 13, 2025, 3:00 p.m.

Proposal must be titled "Proposal for City of Beaumont Preliminary Design Report", and Cost proposal must be titled "Cost Proposal for City of Beaumont Preliminary Design Report" By proposing on this project, you are indicating that you agree to all terms and conditions of the City's Professional Services Agreement (PSA), which is attached to this RFP as Exhibit A.

If prior to the date fixed for submission of Proposals, a prospective Company discovers any ambiguity, conflict, discrepancy, omission or other errors in this RFP or any of its appendices, exhibits or attachments, the Company shall immediately notify the City of such error in writing and request modification or clarification of the document. Modifications shall be made by written Addenda to the RFP.

Page 12 ends

If a Company fails to notify the City, prior to the date fixed for submissions of Proposals, of an error in the RFP known to the Company, or an error that reasonably should have been known to the Company, the Company shall submit its Proposal at its own risk, and if the Company is awarded a Contract, it shall not be entitled to additional compensation or time by reason of the error or its later correction.

All communications regarding technical, scope, and/or project related questions and requests for clarifications, changes, exceptions, and deviations to the terms and conditions set forth in this RFP shall be submitted via "Q&A" through the City's Electronic Bidding System, Planetbids, before the deadline and according to these specifications herein. Any and all other bidding communications shall only be with Raveena Chara, Procurement Contract Specialist, [email protected].

The Final day for receipt of questions from the Proposer shall be on or before the due date indicated in the RFP event schedule section below. To ensure fairness and avoid misunderstandings, all communications must be in written format and submitted only in the format set forth above. Any verbal communications will not be considered or responded to. All questions received by the due date will be logged and reviewed.

No postmarked proposals will be accepted. Once submitted, proposals cannot be altered without prior written consent of the City. The prospective bidder assumes sole responsibility for submitting a complete bid proposal in response to this RFP. No special consideration will be given after bid proposals are opened due to a bidder's failure to comply with all requirements of the RFP.

All costs associated with preparation of any proposal shall be the sole responsibility of the proposer. Each proposal shall be limited to a maximum of 45 pages, using a minimum 12 -point font size.

Event
Date
RFP Issued
March 28, 2025
Questions submitted on Planet Bids deadline
April 18, 2025 @
12:00 p.m.

Answers to Questions on Planet Bids will be posted by
April 24, 2024 @
12:00 p.m.

Proposals Due
May 13, 2025 @
3:00 p.m.

Interviews (if required)
May 26 — May 30, 2025
Award Date (Tentatively)
June 17, 2025

Page 12 ends

Prior to the proposal submittal deadline, all proposals will be designated as confidential to the extent permitted by the California Public Records Act. After the proposal submittal deadline, all responses will be regarded as public records and will be subject to review by the public. Any language purported to render confidential all or portions of the proposals will be regarded as non- effective and will be disregarded.

The City reserves the right to amend the RFP by addendum prior to the final proposal submittal date. The addenda will be posted on the City's Planet Bids Portal:
nttps://venaors.planetbias.com/portalbb R5b/bono-search City of Beaumont Rights and Options
This RFP does not commit the City of Beaumont to award a contract or to pay any cost incurred with the preparation of a proposal or contract for services described herein.

The City may, in its sole discretion and without any obligation to act reasonably, reject any and all proposals, waive informalities and minor irregularities in any proposal reviewed, negotiate with any qualified source submitting a proposal, extend deadlines, and/or request additional information. Subsequent to negotiations, prospective trustees may be required to submit revisions to their proposals. The City may reject any proposal that does not conform to the instructions provided in this RFP. Additionally, the City reserves the right to negotiate all final terms and conditions of any proposal received before entering into final contract.

The City reserves the right to postpone selection for its own convenience, to withdraw this RFP at any time, and to reject any and all proposals without indicating any reason for such rejection.

As a function of the RFP process, the City of Beaumont reserves the right to remedy technical errors in response to the RFP and to modify the published scope of services and scope of work.

Proposals submitted in response to the RFP will not be returned.

All property rights, including publication rights of all reports produced by respondents in connection with services performed under this agreement will be vested in the City. In addition, respondents will not publish or release any of the results of its examination without the express written permission of the City.

Responses must be submitted no later than the date and time stated on this RFP. Responses shall be reviewed and rated as set forth in the Selection Process section of this RFP. The City will then determine which firm best meets the City's requirements.

During the evaluation process, the City reserves the right (where it may serve the City's best interest) to request additional information or clarification from respondents. At the discretion of the City, firms submitting proposals may be requested to make oral presentations as part of the evaluation process.

The City reserves the right to retain all proposals submitted and to use any ideas in a proposal regardless of whether the proposal was selected. Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in this Request for Proposals, unless clearly and specifically

Page 128 ends

noted in the proposal as submitted and confirmed in the contract between the City and the firm selected.

The City reserves the right to negotiate final pricing with the most qualified firm.

The City's standard Professional Services Agreement is included as Exhibit A. Upon award of the contract, it is expected that the successful proposer will accept the Agreement terms and conditions "as is" without modification. Any contract modifications are to be stated prior to the time of submittal.

Any costs incurred in the preparation of the response, presentation to the City, travel in conjunction with such presentations, or samples of items shall be the responsibility of the respondent. The City assumes no responsibility and no liability for costs incurred by respondents prior to the issuance of a contract.

The proposer shall furnish the City with such additional information as the City may reasonably require.

The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive informalities and minor irregularities in any proposal reviewed. The City may reject any proposal that does not conform to the instructions provided in this RFP. Additionally, the City reserves the right to negotiate all final terms and conditions of any proposal received before entering into a final contract.

The Consultant shall disclose any personal or professional financial, business, or other relationships with the City that may have an impact on the outcome of this contract or any resulting project. The consultant shall also list current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome of this contract.
roposaI Evaluation/Selectic
The City intends to engage the most qualified consultant available who demonstrates a thorough understanding of the City's needs. City staff will use the following criteria to evaluate the proposals:

Criteria
Points
Demonstrated Professional Skill and Credentials
20 Approach to Performing These Types of Services
25 Related Experience and Previous Projects
15 Understanding of the Scope of Services
25 Ability and Available Resources to perform the required Services 15 Total
100

Page 1202 of 1893 ends

The City may request a qualification interview with the highest -ranked consultant(s) prior to determining the final ranking. This selection will be conducted according to the City's adopted procedures. The City may select the top two firms and enter into negotiation. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals.

CONTACT WITH ANY CITY EMPLOYEE OTHER THAN THE CONTACT NAMED IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND WILL BE CAUSE FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF THE PROPOSAL.

Links to applicable design standards can be found on the City's website:
https://www.beaumontca.gov/1236/Standards
A. Scope of Services
B. Sample Professional Services Agreement (PSA)
C. Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan
D. 2040 General Plan PEIR

Page 12 ends

END OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

EXHIBITS TO FOLLOW

Page 12 ends

EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
(insert behind this page)

Page 1285 of 1893 ends

BEAUMONT
-C A L I F O R N I A -
EXHIBIT "B"

SAMPLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA)
(insert behind this page)
1

Page 1286 of 1893 ends

The Scope of Services will require the Consultant to provide all labor, equipment, tools, and furnishings necessary to prepare a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) that includes the associated assessments, studies, reports, findings, and preliminary design for the Downtown Beaumont Revitalization Plan (DBRP). Project tasks shall include, but are not necessarily limited to, those items noted below. If the Consultant feels that additional tasks are warranted, they must be clearly identified in the Consultant's proposal. The Scope of Services shall generally include the following tasks:

1. Task 1: Project Management

2. Task 2: Data Gathering and Analysis

3. Task 3: Investigations
o Survey and Centerline Control
o Right -of -Way Analysis
o Utility Research and Potholing
o Geotechnical Investigation
o Hydrological/Drainage Analysis
o Traffic Studies and Assessments
o Street and Pedestrian Lighting Analysis
o Tree Impact Analysis

4. Task 4: Design Options
o Renderings, exhibits, color boards, etc. for public presentation.

5. Task 5: Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
o Introduction
o Project Features and Design Criteria
o Preliminary Design (30%)
• Street Improvement Plans
• Sidewalk, Pedestrian, and ADA Plans
• Intersection Signalization Plans
• Street and Pedestrian Lighting Plans
• Signing and Striping Plans (Bike Lanes)
• Landscaping and Irrigation Plans
• Utility Plans (Existing, Proposed, and Relocation)
• Street Furniture Plans
• Monument and Overhead Sign Plans
• Way Finding Signage Plans

Page 1287 of 1893 ends

o Preliminary Design Specifications
o Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates
o Statement of Limitations
o Reports and Studies
• Survey and Boundary Control Technical Memorandum
• Right -of -Way Technical Memorandum
• Utility Research and Potholing Technical Memorandum
• Geotechnical Report
• Hydrology Report
• Traffic Studies and Analysis
• Lighting Analysis Technical Memorandum
• Tree Impact Analysis Technical Memorandum

6. Optional - Task 6: Environmental Services

Page 1288 of 1893 ends

Detailed Scope of Service'
Task 1 — Project Management
• Coordinate and lead the Project Kick -Off meeting with the City to discuss and review the following:
o List of all stakeholders (other than City), and who will be invited in future meetings, and/or special meetings with "other" stakeholders
o Project background, goals, constraints, and approach
o Project reporting/communication protocols/coordination o Design Approach
o Project Schedule
o Critical/High Priority Scope Items
• Provide project design schedule (baseline and monthly progress updates) in MS Project format. At a minimum, the schedule shall include all submittals, meetings, and milestones.

The schedule shall be updated regularly and reviewed during the monthly progress meetings.
• Coordinate monthly progress meetings with the City. Coordinate meetings with other agencies and stakeholders as necessary.
• Establish effective quality assurance and quality control procedures. o All notes and design calculations, along with design drawings and specifications, shall be reviewed by an appropriate reviewer independent of the Project design team prior to each design submittal. Independent reviewer can be in-house staff or a subconsultant.
o Perform constructability and operational review of the Preliminary Design. o Perform Value Engineering of the proposed design.
• It is assumed the selected Consultant has developed a complete scope of work to achieve the goals of the project as necessary. However, if the Consultant believes during the project development, an additional task will be necessary, which could not have been assumed previously to be part of the scope, before proceeding with any additional work, the Consultant shall notify the City. The Consultant shall submit to the City an additional task order request with detailed explanation and justification for the additional task, including cost and schedule impacts. The City will review and respond to the Consultant's request within a reasonable time.

Submittals: Submit all documents prepared in each task for review and comments. Incorporate review comments and update these documents as necessary. Documents shall be submitted electronically in original file formats (AutoCAD, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, MS Project, etc.), as well as pdf formats.

Project Documents shared file: Create a shared file for project documents and provide access to the City. The format of the filing system for shared files shall be discussed with the City and developed accordingly.

Page 1289 of 1893 ends

Beaumont City CouncilSeptember 2, 2025

Beaumont City Council
September 2, 2025