Belmont City Council
March 12, 2024

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
● Open Space: Safety concerns, not enough restrooms.
● Parks: I do not have the time, biking does not feel safe. ● Athletic Fields: Not aware of the amenities, lack of amenities that interest, public transit is unavailable or inconvenient d enhance tree
multi-use paths in
estrooms
ees
enches and

rack
uiet areas for
to nature and
es. only)
hade (res. only)
cnic areas
ommunity
Question #3
● Open Spac
● Parks: I do
● Athletic Fie
that interes
*Resident only data
Question #5
● Strongly Agree: Bike pump track, maintain & enhance tree canopy, add more multi-use paths in parks
● Agree: Aquatics (by a lot), public art.
● Disagree: Opportunities to buy food or drink.
● Strongly Disagree: Access to WiFi, food/drink, lacrosse fields, and more rental spaces.

Question #5
● Strongly Ag
in parks
● Agree: Aqu
● Disagree: O
● Strongly Di
Question #5

APPENDIX I DRAFT
910
419

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
● Strongly Agree: Bike pump track, maintain & enhance tree canopy, add more multi-use paths in parks
● Agree: Aquatics (by a lot), public art.
● Disagree: Opportunities to buy food or drink.
● Strongly Disagree: Access to WiFi, food/drink, lacrosse fields, and more rental spaces. *Resident only data
Question #5
● Strongly Ag
in parks
● Agree: Aqu
● Disagree: O
● Strongly Di
Question #5
● Strongly Agree: Bike pump track, maintain & enhance tree canopy, add more multi-use paths in parks
● Agree: Aquatics (by a lot), public art.
● Disagree: Opportunities to buy food or drink.
● Strongly Disagree: Access to WiFi, food/drink, lacrosse fields, and more rental spaces.

Question #5
● Strongly Ag
in parks
● Agree: Aqu
● Disagree: O
● Strongly Di
*Resident only data
Question #7
DRAFT Community Outreach
911
420

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
● Strongly Agree: Bike pump track, maintain & enhance tree canopy, add more multi-use paths in parks
● Agree: Aquatics (by a lot), public art.
● Disagree: Opportunities to buy food or drink.
● Strongly Disagree: Access to WiFi, food/drink, lacrosse fields, and more rental spaces.

Question #7
● Strongly Ag
in parks
● Agree: Aqu
● Disagree: O
● Strongly Di
Question #7
● Strongly Agree: Bike pump track, maintain & enhance tree canopy, add more multi-use paths in parks
● Agree: Aquatics (by a lot), public art.
● Disagree: Opportunities to buy food or drink.
● Strongly Disagree: Access to WiFi, food/drink, lacrosse fields, and more rental spaces. *Resident only data
Question #8
● Strongly Ag
in parks
● Agree: Aqu
● Disagree: O
● Strongly Di
Question #8

APPENDIX I DRAFT
912
421

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
● Strongly Agree: Bike pump track, maintain & enhance tree canopy, add more multi-use paths in parks
● Agree: Aquatics (by a lot), public art.
● Disagree: Opportunities to buy food or drink.
● Strongly Disagree: Access to WiFi, food/drink, lacrosse fields, and more rental spaces.

Question #8
● Strongly Ag
in parks
● Agree: Aqu
● Disagree: O
● Strongly Di
*Resident only data
Question #9
● Strongly Agree: Bike pump track, maintain & enhance tree canopy, add more multi-use paths in parks
● Agree: Aquatics (by a lot), public art.
● Disagree: Opportunities to buy food or drink.
● Strongly Disagree: Access to WiFi, food/drink, lacrosse fields, and more rental spaces.

Question #9
● Strongly Ag
in parks
● Agree: Aqu
● Disagree: O
● Strongly Di
Question #9
DRAFT Community Outreach
913
422

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
● Strongly Agree: Bike pump track, maintain & enhance tree canopy, add more multi-use paths in parks
● Agree: Aquatics (by a lot), public art.
● Disagree: Opportunities to buy food or drink.
● Strongly Disagree: Access to WiFi, food/drink, lacrosse fields, and more rental spaces.

FOCUS GROUPS
delineate
not have been
ral near open
ark or
location and
focus group
but an area
ity Interested in participating in a focus group? Email [email protected] Open Space School
District/Youth
Sports
Inclusivity Youth Senior
Questions and Comments from
Advisory Committee
Comments from General Public

PROCESS
Push out 1

APPENDIX I DRAFT
914
423

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Upcoming Meetings NEXT STEPS
○ Focus Group Meetings (May & June)
○ Council of Cities Presentation May 28 at 6 pm
○ Parks & Rec Commission Meeting June 2
○ July and August Commission Meetings Combined: July 21 Previous Meetings:
○ April 6, Planning Commission
○ March 29, Belmont Rotary Presentation
○ March 9, Belmont City Council Meeting
○ March 4, PROS Advisory Meeting
○ March 2, BRSSD Superintendent Meeting
○ Feb 3, March 3, April 7, May 5 Parks & Rec Commission Meetings e

THANK YOU
DRAFT Community Outreach
915
424

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Belmont PROS Plan Advisory Committee Meeting #3
September 30, 2021

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
1 Purpose To discuss Belmont parks and park-specific DRAFT recommendations Introductions + Schedule
Efforts to Date
Park Typologies + Amenities
Park-Specific DRAFT Recommendations
Park Opportunity Sites DRAFT Recommendations
Next Steps
Discussion (Q+A, comments)
AGENDA
2 ADVISORY COMMITTEE
● Role
○ Insights: represent a diverse perspective of interests and ideas ○ Outreach: gather feedback and serve as community liaison to Master Plan team
○ Advise: review and provide input on the Master Plan process 3 PROCESS
Push out 1
4 APPENDIX I DRAFT
916
425

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Push out 1 month
BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
5 CITY-WIDE PARK PROXIMITY
Neighborhood Park Tier 1
Neighborhood Park Tier 2
Schools (JUA)
Trailhead
Community Park
1/8 mile
1/4 mile
1/4 mile
1/4 mile
1/2 mile
Park Access Radii
Park
Trailhead
6 CITY-WIDE PARK CONNECTIVITY

PEDESTRIANS
Source: 2016 Comprehensive
Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
7 CITY-WIDE PARK CONNECTIVITY

BICYCLISTS
Source: 2016 Comprehensive
Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
Class I
Class II
Class III
8 DRAFT Community Outreach
917
426

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS

EFFORTS TO DATE
● Existing Conditions
● Community Engagement
○ Online Survey
○ Focus Groups
● Benchmarking + Trends
● Park Typologies
9 COMMUNITY INPUTS: SURVEY
Top 5 Reasons to Visit a park, recreation, or open space 90%
60% 55% 47% 45%
Top 6 Amenities positively-rated To Enhance the Belmont Park Experience 65% 58% 56% 51% 51% 51%

BELMONT RESIDENTS ON PARKS
10 COMMUNITY INPUTS: FOCUS GROUPS

DOG OWNERS
More shade
More seating
More gathering and
social spaces
More waste bins
Water fountain

SENIORS
More seating
More shade
Generally happy with
existing parks
YOUTH
Hang-out space for
youth/teens
Add seating
Larger-sized play
equipment
Community tables
Game areas

INCLUSIVITY
Inclusive play elements
sized larger (not just for
small children)
Sensory and tactile play
Protected spaces, but
with multiple sightlines
and access points

SCHOOL DISTRICT/

YOUTH SPORTS
Incentivize school field
improvements
Continued growth in
sports field demand
Interest in synthetic turf
11 Amenity:

Basketball Court *
Multi-use Athletic Field *
Playground *
Reservable Picnic Area
Tennis Court *
AMENITIES: BENCHMARKED

0.0 AMENITY 1.0

AMENITY

0.50 AMENITY
BELMONT Burlingame San Carlos Saratoga California National Population Range
* includes amenities at Belmont’s Schools (JUA) sites
per 1,000 RESIDENTS
No CA or National benchmark
12 APPENDIX I DRAFT
918
427

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS

PARK TYPOLOGIES
Community Park Neighborhood Park
Tier 2
Neighborhood Park
Tier 1
● Generate the most visitors
● High use intensities
● Accessed by foot, bike, or car
● Large capture area (1/2 mile radius)
● Interacting with nature, gathering, and
recreation
● Local and nearby neighborhoods
● Accessed by foot, bike, and car
● Medium capture area (1/4 mile radius)
● Interacting with nature or gathering
● Local neighborhood
● Mainly accessed by foot or by bike
● Small capture area (1/8 mile radius)

STANDARD BASELINE AMENITIES

1. Natural Environment

2. Seating

3. Play Amenity

4. Picnic Opportunity

5. Multi-purpose Flexible Space

6. Recreation Amenity

7. Off-Street Parking

8. Permanent Restroom

9. Multi-use Athletic Field or Community
Facility

STANDARD BASELINE AMENITIES

1. Natural Environment

2. Seating

3. Play Amenity

4. Picnic Opportunity

5. Multi-purpose Flexible Space

6. Recreation Amenity

STANDARD BASELINE AMENITIES

1. Natural Environment

2. Seating

3. Identifiable Amenity
13 AMENITIES
Nature Gathering Nature Gathering Recreation
Amenity
Trees /
shade
relax gather Multi-use
path
All abilities dog bike
playground
Multi-use
lawn
Trees + Shade Natural Environment Gathering Area Multi-use Paths Multi-use Flex Space All-Abilities Play Dog Park Pump Track Seating
Nature + Play
+ Gathering
Play Amenity Recreation
Amenity
Recreation +
Play Amenity
??? Amenity
Pickleball
14 AMENITIES: BELMONT IDEAL
Benchmarked Amenity
2021 2035
All-Abilities Playground + 1 0
Basketball Court (Full) 0 + 2
Basketball Court (Half) 0 + 2
Multi-Use Athletic Field + 1 + 2
Play Element + 3 0
Playground 0 + 2
Reservable Picnic Area,
Small + 2 + 1
Reservable Picnic Area,
Large + 1 0
Tennis Court + 2 + 1
Priority Amenity
2021 2035
Community Garden + 1 0
Dog Park + 1 0
Dog Parklet + 2 0
Pump Track (Bike Park) + 1 0
Skate Park + 1 0
Water Play, Pool + 1 0
Water Play, Spray Park + 1 0
Secondary Amenity
2021 2035
Fitness Equipment Cluster + 1 0
Handball Court / Wall Ball 0 + 1
Horseshoe Pit / Bocce Ball
Court 0 + 1
Outdoor Classroom + 1 0
Performance Space 0 0
Teen Outdoor Space + 2 0
Volleyball Court + 1 0
Priority Amenities were highly ranked in community outreach 15

PAUSE FOR QUESTIONS
from Advisory Committee
16 DRAFT Community Outreach
919
428

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS SPECTRUM
Existing
Master Plan
Minor
Improvements
Upgraded or
New Amenity
Park
Redesign
Undeveloped
Parks
New Park
Opportunity
Master Plans
recently created
Extensive
community input
Recommendation:

Implement Master
Plan
Parks recently
developed or in
very good
condition
Minor
improvements to
maintain
high-quality
Current park
functioning well
New amenity to
meet identified
needs
Upgrade existing
amenity to meet
identified needs
No
change-in-use
Rethink
accessibility and
park layout
Park Master Plan
process
Existing parks are
undeveloped
Proposed
recommendations
to amenitize site
City-owned property
To fill gaps in park
proximity
Proposed
recommendations to
amenitize site
Barrett Community
Twin Pines
College View
Davey Glen
Patricia Wharton
Semeria
Wakefield
Alexander
Belameda
Belmont Sports
McDougal
O’Donnell
Cipriani
Hallmark
Hastings
Hidden Canyon
Ralston Ranch
Ralston & Old County
Oak Knoll
Alameda de las Pulgas
Belmont Village
Specific Plan
17 RECOMMENDATIONS: BARRETT COMMUNITY

EXISTING MASTER PLAN

10. Trees + Shade

3. Pool 4. Splash Park

7. Synthetic
Athletic Field

2. Dog Parklet

6. Community
Center

1. Parking : 5. Playground : 8. Multi-use Sports Court : 9. Picnic Area 18 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: BELAMEDA

UPGRADED/NEW AMENITY

1. Multi-use Path

3. Learn-to-Ride
Loop
f. Fitness
Equipment

2. Teen Outdoor
Space
4 + 5. Planting
Areas
Seating : Planting : High-Quality Landscape
19 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: BELMONT SPORTS

UPGRADED/NEW AMENITY

6. Synthetic
Athletic Fields

3. Fitness
Equipment 2. Pump Track

4. Picnic Tables 5. Planting Areas

1. Gathering
Space
Seating
20 APPENDIX I DRAFT
920
429

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS: O’DONNELL

UPGRADED/NEW AMENITY

3. Spray Element

2. BBQs 1. Reservable
Picnic Area
Planting : High-Quality Landscape
21 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: HIDDEN CANYON
OPTION A: NATURE-ORIENTED

UNDEVELOPED PARK

3. Community
Garden

4. Outdoor
Classroom
b. Seating /
Gathering Space

1. ADA Parking : 2. Parking : Accessible : Seating : Planting : Shade d. Picnic Area
c. Play + Outdoor
Experience
Entrance

4. Permanent
Restroom
22 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: HIDDEN CANYON
OPTION B: DOG PARKLET

UNDEVELOPED PARK

2. Parking 4. Permanent
Restroom 3. Dog Park
d. Picnic Area b. Gathering Space
+ Seating

1. ADA Parking : Accessible : Seating : Planting : Shade c. Play + Outdoor
Experience
Entrance
23 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: RALSTON RANCH

UNDEVELOPED PARK
d. Picnic Tables
f. Dog Parklet 1. Walking Paths
b. Seating c. Play Element
e. Gathering Space
Accessible : Trees : Planting
24 DRAFT Community Outreach
921
430

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS

PARK OPPORTUNITY SITES
Caltrain + Belmont Village
Specific Plan
Oak Knoll
Alameda de las
Pulgas
Park Proximity Map
25 DRAFT OPPORTUNITY: RALSTON & OLD COUNTY

INTERIM PLACEMAKING OPPORTUNITY

1. Dog Parklet 2. Placemaking
a. Gateway
planting b. Seating c. Skate Park Skate Park

3. Public Art
Accessible : Planting
26 DRAFT OPPORTUNITY: OAK KNOLL

NEW PARK OPPORTUNITY
b. Benches c. Play Element
Accessible : Planting
27 DRAFT OPPORTUNITY: ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS

NEW PARK OPPORTUNITY
b. Benches c. Play Element

1. Walking Paths
Accessible : Planting
28 APPENDIX I DRAFT
922
431

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Upcoming Community Input Opportunities
○ Online Comments and Feedback
○ Neighborhood Focus Group Meetings: mid-October
○ Parks & Rec Commission Meeting: November 3
○ City Council Meeting: November 23
PROS Plan: Implementation
○ Prioritization
○ Action Plan
e

NEXT STEPS
29 Comment and
provide feedback at
BelmontPROSplan.com
[email protected]
All Park-Specific Recommendations available on PROS Plan website.

Upcoming Meetings
○ Focus Groups (May)
○ Council of Cities Presentation May 27 at 6 pm
○ June Commission Meeting; Focus on Parks (not Open Space) data, priorities ○ July and August Commission Meetings Combined (third week in July) Previous Meetings:
○
○ April 6, Planning Commission
○ March 29, Belmont Rotary Presentation
○ March 9, Belmont City Council Meeting
○ March 3, PROS Advisory Meeting
○ March 2, BRSSD Superintendent Meeting
○ Feb 3, Park and Rec Commission Meeting
■ Survey live for 4 weeks (end April 30th) another constant contact the week before PROS Groups - Wednesday May 19th 9-10:45am June Commission and Focus Groups findings update/progress, next AC Meeting

DRAFT RECOMMENDATION FEEDBACK
30 NEIGHBORHOOD FOCUS GROUPS
delineate
not have been
ral near open
ark or
location and
focus group
but an area
ity
Neighborhood:

HIDDEN CANYON PARK
Mon Oct. 18, 6:30pm
Meeting will be Virtual
Neighborhood:

RALSTON RANCH PARK
Wed Oct. 20, 6:30pm
Meeting will be Virtual
Register to participate at BelmontPROSplan.com 31
QUESTIONS + COMMENTS
from Advisory Committee
32 DRAFT Community Outreach
923
432

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS

COMMENTS
from General Public
20 minutes allotted for comments on agenda items
Speaker time will be limited based on number of persons wishing to comment Questions will not be answered live in this meeting
Visit BelmontPROSplan.com or
email [email protected]
to comment and provide feedback
33 THANK YOU!
34 BelmontPROSplan.com
[email protected]
35 APPENDIX I DRAFT
924
433

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Advisory Committee #4
April 5, 2022

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
1 PROS Plan purpose:

Set the framework for decision makers in the planning,
maintenance, development, and/or rehabilitation of Belmont’s Parks and open space system for a 15 year horizon.

Purpose To discuss the Open Space Management Plan
PROS Plan Efforts to Date
Open Space Management Plan
○ Overview of planning process and tasks
○ Management alternatives input
Schedule + Next Steps
AGENDA
2 Push out 1 month
BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
3 EFFORTS TO DATE
4 ● Existing Conditions Assessments
● Community Engagement
● Benchmarking + Trends
● Park Typologies
● Park-specific Recommendations
○ Park-specific Focus Groups: Hidden Canyon 10/18, Ralston Ranch 10/20 ○ In-depth review at January, February, and March 2022 Parks & Recreation Commission ● Goals and Strategies
● Recommendation Prioritization + Action Plan
● Continuing Community Engagement
● Open Space Management Plan
DRAFT Community Outreach
925
434

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
BIG IDEAS + GOALS
5 Prioritize
Environmental
+ Financial
Sustainability
Celebrate
the Outdoors
Outdoor
Recreation
for All
The City
as Your
Backyard
12 Goals
BIG IDEAS + GOALS
6 The City
as Your
Backyard
Goal 1. Support a connected Belmont by encouraging a robust pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit network unifying PROS sites across the City.

Goal 2. Foster a healthy community through spaces, amenities, programs, and public art to encourage physical activity, social interaction, and highlight Belmont’s culture and history.

Goal 3. Expand and enhance the existing PROS system to meet evolving community needs by establishing new uses, improved spaces, and recreation amenities that highlight the natural environment.

BIG IDEAS + GOALS
7 Outdoor
Recreation
for All
Goal 4. Leverage assets of the PROS system to support community health providing diverse, equitable, and inclusive spaces and amenities with accessible routes.

Goal 5. Revitalize the PROS system to be adaptable, flexible, and supportive of many uses and users now and into the future.

Goal 6. Partner with a variety of agencies, departments, volunteer groups, other entities, and the community to actualize PROS Plan goals and policies.

BIG IDEAS + GOALS
8 Celebrate
the Outdoors
Goal 7. Develop and implement an Open Space Management Plan.

Goal 8. Expand educational opportunities in parks and open spaces to highlight the local ecosystems.

Goal 9. Continue to enrich Belmont’s outdoor recreation opportunities with trail improvements, volunteer collaborations, and wayfinding features.

APPENDIX I DRAFT
926
435

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
BIG IDEAS + GOALS
9 Prioritize
Environmental
+ Financial
Sustainability
Goal 10. Nurture the ecological strength of the City’s natural resources through resource-efficient landscapes and operations.

Goal 11. Provide high-quality, actively-managed, and well-maintained PROS assets supported by a range of funding sources.

Goal 12. Prioritize sustainable, resilient, and responsible management and maintenance practices, improvements, and projects at PROS sites.

AN ENGAGED COMMUNITY
10 Community Survey
Pop-up participation at City events
PROS Advisory Committee
Parks and Recreation Commission 4 meetings in 2021 + 2022 Updates at every
P&R Commission
meeting
Recommendations
reviewed in-depth at
Jan/Feb/March 2022
* April 24th
Celebrate the Music
Concerts in the Park, Movie
Night in the Park, etc.

Focus Groups
11 in 2021
Emails + Comments
Over 730
(2020 to February 2022)
Emails to [email protected] and/or P&R
Commission, and Comments via project website
City Council presentations
3 in 2021 + 2022
* April 16th
Egg Hunt

OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The purpose of the Open Space Management Plan is to guide City decision-making for:
● Managing sensitive resources
● Balancing recreation uses
● Mitigating hazards
11 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
12 DRAFT Community Outreach
927
436

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Plan process includes 8 tasks:

1. Project startup and orientation

2. Review of existing information

3. Develop goals and policies

4. Describe existing environmental conditions

5. Describe current and potential future recreational activities

6. Develop Management Alternatives and recommendations

7. Prepare Open Space Management Plan

8. Meetings for public input and Plan adoption
13 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN

1. Task 3: Develop Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

2. Task 4: Describe existing environmental conditions

3. Task 5: Describe current and potential recreational activities

4. Task 6: Development Management Alternatives
14 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Current Tasks

1. Reviewed goals and policies from existing City
planning documents.

2. Identified those goals and policies relevant to
the OSMP.

3. Reviewed and adapted goals, policies, and
implementation actions from regional open
space management plans.
15 Task 3: Goals and Policies
Goal=A general statement that articulates a desired outcome.

Policy=A more specific statement that states what steps the City will take to achieve a desired outcome.

Implementation Action=A measurable action that specifies how a desired outcome is achieved.

Developing definitions for key terms (e.g., riparian resources, sensitive resources) 16 Task 3: Goals and Policies

APPENDIX I DRAFT
928
437

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS

1. Existing planning documents include goals,
policies, and implementation actions in the
following categories:
a. Protection of sensitive resources
b. Trail maintenance
c. Visitor Demand and Management
d. Visitor Safety and Hazard Management
17 Task 3: Goals and Policies

1. Identified new categories to address
management issues and public comments:
a. New unauthorized trails
b. Trail closures - redundant trails
c. Protection of riparian resources
d. Adaptive Management
e. Use of e-bikes
f. Wildfire hazards
18 Task 3: Goals and Policies
Desktop Review of Environmental Conditions

1. CNDDB records

2. USFWS Information for Planning and Conservation Species

3. CNPS Inventory records

4. California Bird Species of Special Concern

5. USFWS Critical Habitat Mapper
19 Task 4: Environmental Assessment
Field Assessment of Environmental Conditions Waterdog and San Juan Canyon open spaces

1. “Ground-truth” vegetation communities obtained from the San Mateo County vegetation mapping.

2. Assess conditions of 9.6 miles of trails.

3. Determine if existing conditions provide suitable habitat for any special-status plant or wildlife species.

4. Assess baseline conditions of vegetation as observed from trails. 20 Task 4: Environmental Assessment
DRAFT Community Outreach
929
438

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Potentially suitable habitat for:

1. Western leatherwood

2. San Francisco Dusky Footed Woodrat
21 Task 4: Environmental Assessment
Image source: National Park Service
Trail Assessment reviewed the following:

1. Trail erosion

2. Presence of multiple trails (social trails) in a single area

3. Presence of legacy trails

4. Stream crossings
22 Task 4: Environmental Assessment
23 Task 4: Environmental Assessment
Low Erosion Example
24 Task 4: Environmental Assessment
Medium Erosion Example

APPENDIX I DRAFT
930
439

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
25 Task 4: Environmental Assessment
High Erosion Example
Examine current and future recreation uses

1. Both current and future use in Belmont open space areas are influenced by local population size.

2. Belmont’s population grew at 10% during the last decade.

3. Other factors, such as the pandemic and new technology, also influence use in more significant ways than
population size.

4. Results of regional park surveys show trail use and wildlife and scenery viewing most frequently engaged activities
for open space areas.
26 Task 5: Recreational Use Assessment
Managing the open space trail system

1. Trail system design and maintenance can accommodate
varying levels of use while avoiding environmental
degradation

2. Legacy trails were not always built or maintained with current Best Management Practices for trail design and maintenance

3. Management options for legacy trails:
a. Re-construct in the current, exact location
b. Construct new segment along the same general route
c. Re-route
d. Seasonal closures
e. Permanent closures 27
Task 5: Recreational Use Assessment

1. Developing two management alternatives for the OSMP.

2. Each alternative represents a mix of goals, policies, and implementation actions to address management concerns and public comments.

3. Choice between alternatives is typically not “All or None.” 28 Task 6: Management Alternatives
DRAFT Community Outreach
931
440

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Management Alternatives must address all goal/policy categories:

1. Protection of sensitive resources

2. Trail maintenance

3. Visitor Demand and Management

4. Visitor Safety and Hazard Management

5. New unauthorized trails

6. Trail closures

7. Protection of riparian resources

8. Adaptive Management

9. Use of e-bikes

10. Wildfire hazards
29 Task 6: Management Alternatives
Defining management actions:

1. Trail maintenance: periodic, regular actions to clean or repair drainage structures (Water bars, rolling dips).

2. Habitat restoration: identifying areas where native plants could be successfully restored, then designing and implementing restoration plans.

3. Adaptive Management: periodically collecting information on resources conditions and determining any follow-up actions to meet restoration or protection goals.

4. Wildfire hazards: periodically reducing excessive fuels through grazing, manual labor and equipment.
30 Task 6: Management Alternatives
How should the city and its partners allocate effort to the OSMP? 31 Task 6: Management Alternatives

1. Existing plans focused on protection sensitive resources, trail maintenance, visitor demand and management, and visitor safety/hazard management.

2. New policies are needed to address: adaptive management, trail management, protecting riparian resources, e-bikes, and wildfire hazards.

3. Multiple trail sections are in poor condition and need immediate attention.

4. Habitat conditions show minimal degradation.

5. Western leatherwood (plant) and SF Dusky-footed woodrat were found.

6. There are some opportunities for habitat restoration.

7. There are multiple opportunities for periodic wildfire hazard reduction. 32 Preliminary conclusions

APPENDIX I DRAFT
932
441

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS

1. Finish Environmental Use Assessment.

2. Finish Recreation Use Assessment.

3. Finish Management Alternatives.

4. Prepare Draft Open Space Management Plan.

5. Solicit Public Feedback.
33 Next Steps
34 ● Continuing Community
Input Opportunities
○ April 16: Egg Hunt
○ April 24: Celebrate
the Music
○ Email to
[email protected]
○ Parks & Recreation
Commission
● Open Space
Management Plan
○ July
● PROS Plan:

Implementation
○ Prioritization
○ Action Plan

SCHEDULE
THANK YOU!
35 www.BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]

ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Q + A
36 DRAFT Community Outreach
933
442

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
PUBLIC

COMMENTS
2 minutes per speaker
37 ADVISORY COMMITTEE

COMMENTS
38 Push out 1 month
BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
39 APPENDIX I DRAFT
934
443

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Advisory Committee Meeting
May 31, 2022

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
1 PROS Plan purpose:

Set the framework for decision makers in the planning,
maintenance, development, and/or rehabilitation of Belmont’s Parks and open space system for a 15 year horizon.

Purpose To discuss the Open Space Management Plan and provide guidance for the future of Belmont’s Open Spaces
Open Space Management Plan
○ Environmental Assessment
○ Base Plan and Management Alternatives
○ Implementation Actions and Requirements
Next Steps
AGENDA*
2 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Adoption of the OSMP will enable the city to:
• Augment existing goals and policies pertaining to open space • Commit to specific “implementation actions”
○ Actions may require funding, and possible environmental compliance and permitting requirements.
3 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN*
Key issues addressed:
4 Environmental
Sustainability
Balanced
Recreational
Uses + Trail
Management
Natural Hazard
Mitigation
DRAFT Community Outreach
935
444

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
5 Open space areas addressed in the Plan
6 City and County Plans
Belmont
General Plan
San Mateo
County Hazard
Mitigation Plan
Open Space Plans
MidPen
Resource
Management
Policies
Marin Road and
Trail
Management
Plan
Studies and Databases
California
Natural Diversity
Database
Relevant
peer-reviewed
literature
Community
Input
Emails/written
comments
Public meetings
Environmental
Assessment Base Plan
and
Recreation Alternatives
Use
Assessment
Inputs to Base Plan and Management
Alternatives
Existing Planning Documents Used
● San Mateo County Hazard Mitigation Plan (2021)
● ADA Transition Plan (2018)
● 2035 GP, Parks and Conservation Elements (2017)
● Belmont Climate Action Plan (2017)
● Open Space Trail Master Plan (1998)
● San Juan Hills Plan Area Plan (1988)
● Belmont Parks and Open Space Plan (1992)
● Western Hills Area Plan (1990)
7 Policy Gaps addressed by OSMP
● Protection of riparian resources
● Adaptive management and monitoring
● Trail closures/re-routing
● Trail maintenance
● E-bikes
8 APPENDIX I DRAFT
936
445

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Environmental Assessment
9 ● The environmental assessment is:
○ Is a master planning level study to
support development of goals, policies,
and implementation actions.
○ Involves limited fieldwork to identify
any environmental concerns that will
require detailed field based evaluation.
10 Environmental Assessment
● The environmental assessment is not:
○ A research project
○ A complete vegetation survey of the entire
open space areas
○ A series of wildlife surveys to verify the
presence of common or sensitive wildlife
species.

Desktop Review and Field Assessment of:

1. Common & sensitive plant species

2. Common & sensitive animal species

3. Vegetation communities-naturally occurring and
exotic

4. Trail conditions
11 Environmental Assessment
Components Desktop Review of Environmental Conditions
● CNDDB records
● USFWS Information for Planning and Conservation Species ● CNPS Inventory records
● California Species of Special Concern
● USFWS Critical Habitat Mapper
12 Environmental Assessment: Methods
DRAFT Community Outreach
937
446

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Field Assessment of Environmental Conditions (WDL and SJC)

1. Verify in the field vegetation communities identified in San Mateo County data (2021)

2. Assess conditions of trails

3. Determine if existing conditions provide suitable habitat for any special-status species

4. Assess baseline conditions of vegetation and wildlife habitat

5. Note any common wildlife and plant species observed
13 Environmental Assessment: Methods
Initial Field Assessment of Environmental Conditions
● 2 WRA staff performed field assessments on March 8, 21, and 22 ● Traversed over 10 miles of existing trails
14 Environmental Assessment: Results
Vegetation Rating Categories:
15 ● High Quality/Mostly Intact
● Moderate Quality/Moderately Altered
● Low Quality
● Low Quality/ Extensively Altered
Verify in the field vegetation communities at Waterdog Lake 16 Environmental Assessment: Results

APPENDIX I DRAFT
938
447

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Most abundant vegetation types at WDL
17 Coastal Live oak Chamise
18 Environmental Assessment: Results
Most abundant vegetation types at SJC
19 Coyote Brush Coastal Live oak
A. Trail erosion
B. Presence of multiple (braided) trails or trail sections in a single area C. Presence of unofficial trails
D. Stream crossings
20 Environmental Assessment: trail
condition indicators
Low Medium High
DRAFT Community Outreach
939
448

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
21 Environmental Assessment: Trail Condition
Findings
Location Low Erosion Medium Erosion High Erosion Total Erosion Instances

WATERDOG LAKE
Official trails 127 (56%) 77 (34%) 25 (11%) 229
Unofficial trails 59 (83%) 7 (10%) 6 (8%) 71

SAN JUAN CANYON
Official trails 5 (38%) 7 (54%) 1 (8%) 13
Unofficial trails 11 (85%) 2 (15%) 0 (0%) 13
Environmental Assessment: Trail Density Findings
● Trail density not having an effect on other environmental indicators:
○ Presence of common wildlife species
○ Presence of special status wildlife species
○ Habitat conditions
○ Carnivore movements
22 ● Western (Pacific) pond turtle
● Olive-sided flycatcher
● White-tailed kite
● San Francisco (saltmarsh) common yellowthroat
● Hoary bat
● American badger
23 Environmental Assessment: Findings
Sensitive Wildlife with Moderate or higher potential to occur During the March site visits WRA confirmed presence of these two special-status species

1. Western leatherwood

2. San Francisco Dusky Footed Woodrat
24 Environmental Assessment: Findings

APPENDIX I DRAFT
940
449

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Regarding baseline conditions of vegetation and wildlife habitat:

A. Most vegetation is in good condition.

B. Low potential to occur for many sensitive plant and animal species identified during “desktop” review
C. Recreation use generally not having environmental impacts a. Exception: trails that go directly through stream channels that are not “protected” with erosion stabilization features
D. Both open space areas contain habitat for bobcats and mountain lions. 25 Environmental Assessment: Findings
● California towhee
● Spotted towhee
● Wrentit
● California quail
● Anna’s hummingbird
● Common Merganser
● Mallard
● Red-shouldered hawk
● Mountain lion*
● Bobcat*
26 Environmental Assessment: Findings
Common Wildlife Identified
● Black-tailed mule deer
● Western fence lizard
● Pond turtle
● Bullthistle
● Annual hairgrass
● Sticky monkeyflower
● Yerba santa
● Blue gum eucalyptus
● Fennel
● French broom
● Toyon
● Foxtail barley
● Goldfields
● Arroyo lupine
● Pineapple weed
● Bur clover
27 Environmental Assessment: Findings
Common Plants Identified
● Gold back fern
● Harding grass
● Western choke cherry
● Coast live oak
● California blackberry
● Common snowberry
28 Environmental Assessment: Trail
Critical and Possible Recommendations

1. Critical: Address severe erosion areas

2. Critical: Protect stream crossings or reroute

3. Consider potential further assessment to determine
disposition of trails for appropriate management:
○ Maintain as is
○ Re-construct in the current, exact location for hydrology ○ Construct new segment along the same general route
○ Re-route entire trail
○ Seasonal closures
○ Permanent closures
DRAFT Community Outreach
941
450

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Recreation Use Assessment
29 Desktop Review

1. Note potential safety issues during trail conditions assessment.

2. Review local and regional trends in open space recreational uses.

3. Consider opportunities to improve trail user experiences.

Field Assessment of Environmental Conditions
● 2 WRA staff performed 2 additional days of field assessments 30 Recreation Use Assessment: Methods*
● Many trails or trail segments lack adequate
signage and wayfinding.
● Some trail segments lack sustainable
alignments/construction.
● There are multiple areas where visitor experiences
could be enhanced.
31 Recreational Use Assessment: Findings

1. Adopt trail construction standards for which existing trails can be assessed and improved.

2. Consider single use and single travel direction trail segments to enhance visitor experiences.

3. Measure recreation use and survey non-visitors to evaluate visitor experiences and management actions.
32 Recreation Use Assessment:

Recommendations

APPENDIX I DRAFT
942
451

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Wildfire Hazard Assessment
33 34
Wildland Fire Assessment: Findings

1. Calfire rates the two open space areas as very high (WDL) and high for SJC

2. Majority of vegetation in WDL and SJC open space areas are ranked low hazard and low ignition potential.

3. Many of the WDL open space lands immediately adjacent to residential areas subjected to recent fuel reduction.

Management Alternatives Update
35 1. The “Base” Plan is a set of objectives, policies, and implementation actions. a. Added new objectives and policies based on WRA’s expertise and experience. b. Many of these originated from city planning documents.

2. Objectives and policies from 2035 GP, Park & Recreation, and Conservation Elements are incorporated by reference.

3. One alternative provides an additional recreational policy.

4. One alternative provides additional habitat protection and restoration policies.
36 Base Plan and Management
Alternatives
DRAFT Community Outreach
943
452

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Objectives cover the following categories:
● Environmental Sustainability
● Balanced Recreation Use
● Natural Hazard Mitigation
● Vegetation Protection
● Wildlife Protection
● Water Resources
● Science based Management (Adaptive management)
● Expanded ability (human, financial resources)
37 Base Plan
● Includes 39 new policies.
● Includes 28 implementation actions.
● Representative implementation actions include:
○ Actively seek additional funding sources to support wildfire hazard mitigation. ○ Periodically conduct visitor surveys to gauge experiences for all trail users. ○ Monitor and control exotic or nuisance plant species. 38 Recreation Emphasis Alternative
● Contains 1 additional policy (evaluate new trails)
● Includes 3 additional implementation actions:
○ Designate existing connection routes or build new trails between open space areas
○ Implement single-use and one-way trail segments in areas identified in the Recreation Use Assessment
○ Evaluate potential new nature-based recreation programming for open space lands.
39 Habitat Emphasis Alternative
● Contains 4 additional new policies:
○ Expand volunteer restoration programs.
○ Preserve and enhance native wildlife habitat.
○ Preserve and enhance riparian, stream, and other wetland communities. ○ Partner with abutting property owners to manage adjacent fuel loads and vegetation.
40 APPENDIX I DRAFT
944
453

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Habitat Emphasis Alternative
● Contains 4 additional implementation actions:
○ Engage volunteer groups to monitor plant and wildlife species using citizen science efforts.
○ Restore and expand native bunchgrass areas.
○ Install wildlife cameras at high activity locations or in riparian habitats to monitor wildlife presence.
○ Install decontamination stations at high use trailheads to prevent the spread of SOD.
41 Implementation Requirements and
Examples*
42 1. Review/comment on Environmental Assessment and Recreation Use Assessment.

2. Review/comment on Base Plan.

3. Review/comment on Alternatives.

4. Open House event June 13
○ Hidden Canyon Park, 5-7pm

5. Plan adoption by City Council July 12.
43 Next Steps
44 Continuing Community
Input Opportunities

SCHEDULE
● Email to [email protected]
● May 31st PROS Advisory Committee
● OSMP Event planned for mid-June
DRAFT Community Outreach
945
454

APPENDIX I
PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS

ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Q + A
46 PUBLIC

COMMENTS
2 minutes per speaker
47 ADVISORY COMMITTEE

COMMENTS
48 THANK YOU!
45 www.BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]

APPENDIX I DRAFT
946
455

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD

ADVISORY COMMITTEE PRESENTATIONS
Push out 1 month
BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
49 DRAFT Community Outreach
947

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
948

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 457 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Parks and Recreation Commission
February 3, 2021

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
AGENDA
Purpose: Update Commission on Efforts to date and solicit input on project expectations

1. Project Overview

2. Efforts to Date

3. Desired Outcomes
Gates + Associates PROS Committee Advisory Committee
Avery Lyford
Karl Mittelstadt
Craig Michaels
Abby Sanders
Brigitte Shearer
Daniel Ourtiague
George Brunson

INTRODUCTIONS
Linda Gates
Casey Case
Melonie
O’Sullivan
Purpose of the Master Plan
Set the framework for decision makers in the
planning, maintenance, development, and or
rehabilitation of Belmont’s Parks and open space
system for a 15 year horizon.

PURPOSE
DRAFT Community Outreach
949

APPENDIX I
458 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
PROCESS PROCESS: OUTREACH STRATEGY
Round #1 Round #2 Round #3
Where are we now?
What do we want?
Identify Key Issues
Input on unmet needs
How can we meet our
needs?
Deeper dive on trends
from Round #1
Park Recommendations
What are our
priorities?
Master Plan
recommendations and
criteria for prioritization
PROCESS: OUTREACH EVENTS
- Project Website
- Advisory Committee Meetings (4 Total)
- Community-Wide Survey
- Stakeholder Focus Group Meetings (6 Total) - User Group or Topic (Open Space, Teens, etc., …)
- Neighborhood Meetings (6 Total)
- Community Pop Up Events (3 Total)
- Community Workshops (2 Total)
- Parks and Recreation Committee Presentation (4 Total) - Planning Commission Meeting
- City Council Presentation (3 Total)
PROCESS: OUTREACH
Outreach to date:
- Brand (Logo/Tagline)
- Project Website
- Identify Community Enhancers
- Selected Our Channels
- Began Our Questions for Round #1
Survey

APPENDIX I DRAFT
950

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 459 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
PROCESS: COMMUNITY OUTREACH
BelmontPROSPlan.com
PROCESS: COMMUNITY AWARENESS
Leveraging Existing Channels
- Social Media
- Banner on City Website
- E Newsletter
- Postcard Mailers/Sheets in Activity Kits
- Signs in Parks/Trails
- Existing Email Lists (Twin Pines, Barrett
Master Plan, Etc.)
- School Newsletters
- Newspapers
- Neighborhood association, clubs,
groups
ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Criteria Matrix
Sample
● Geographic
● Demographics
● Special Interests
● Vested Partners

SURVEY TOPICS
- Age of respondee
- Resident/ Non-Resident
- Frequency of use
- Which outdoor space used most frequently
- Reasons for use
- Barriers to use
- What do you like about the PROS
- What type of amenities would you like to see added?
- Which outdoor programs would you like to see added?
- Which community values should be reflected in the park system? - Priorities for the PROS master plan
- Additional thoughts
- Email address to subscribe to newsletter
DRAFT Community Outreach
951

APPENDIX I
460 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

ONLINE SURVEY AWARENESS
Presentations to the Community
City Council
Planning Commission
Youth Advisory Committee
VOICES - Youth Volunteer group
Rotary
Neighborhood Associations
Others?
Presentations will be virtual until
in-person gatherings are permitted
Round #1 Survey Participation Boosters
Community Enhancers
Schoolforce
Youth sports leagues
Chamber of Commerce
Faith based organizations
Others?

HONOR THE PAST
● 2001 Athletic Field Master
Plan
● 2018 ADA Transition Plan
● Parks, Recreation & Open
Space element of General
Plan
● Twin Pines & Barrett Master
Plans & community outreach
summaries
● San Juan Hills Area Plan
● Belmont Village Specific Plan
● Climate Action Plan
● Community Center
Conceptual Design Report
● Green Infrastructure Design
Guide
● 1998 Open Space Trail
Master Plan
● 1992 Parks and Open
Space Master Plan
● Park Improvement
Impact Fee Nexus
Study Draft
● Parcel Maps for Water
Dog Lake and San
Juan Canyon
● Belmont and School
Joint Use Agreement
● Western Hills Area
Plan
● GIS Maps of Parks
GUIDING PRINCIPLES ● General Plan
○ Community character
○ Easy mobility
○ Natural beauty
○ Thriving culture
○ Parks create sense of
community and quality of life
○ Harmony with land use policies
and the Circulation Element
● PROS Master Plan RFP
○ Sustainability
○ Inclusion
○ Environmental stewardship
○ Fire safety
○ Preservation
○ Historical and cultural character
● Other Objectives
○ Consider the mature park
system, evolving (not growing)
demographics and address
specific challenges
○ Reimagine the park system
with evolving use patterns,
emerging trends, embraces
technology
○ Focus investment on public /
private collaboration, revenue
generating operations and
maximizing public benefit/
return with a clear action plan
Benchmarking of 3 comparable
Cities
○ San Carlos
○ Foster City
○ Burlingame
City Staff Park Usage Study
○ Open Space – Waterdog
○ Community Parks –
McDougal Park & Athletic
Fields, Belameda Park
○ Neighborhood Parks –
Cipriani, Alexander Park,
Hallmark Park

BENCHMARKING

APPENDIX I DRAFT
952

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 461 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

EXISTING SITE ASSESSMENT DESIRED OUTCOMES
DRAFT Community Outreach
953

APPENDIX I
462 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting
June 2, 2021

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
Set the framework for decision makers in the
planning, maintenance, development, and/or
rehabilitation of Belmont’s parks and open
space system and related recreational
programming for a 15 year horizon.

PURPOSE

MASTER PLAN GOALS & GUIDING PRINCIPLES
○ Provide equitable access to resources and activities across the entire city ○ Promote inclusion to people of all backgrounds, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic position or physical/cognitive ability ○ Offer services and activities across a range of interests, abilities, and ages ○ Reflect our commitment to environmental resilience and sustainability ○ Respect the beauty and importance of our natural resources ○ Advances community health and well-being
○ Foster a sense of community and encourage social interaction ○ Are well maintained and actively managed over time
○ Can adapt to changing conditions and needs
○ Utilize transparent community process to inform decisions

SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS

APPENDIX I DRAFT
954

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 463 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Can we tease apart the
“othr”?
- Make the “other”
category not the first
- Group together or
similarly color-code
the non-Belmont
groups
- Resident
- non-resident
- People in Belmont
use OS and parks
outside of Belmont
and may balance
those who venture
to Belmont to use
amenities
Question #11
● Open Spac
● Parks: I do
● Athletic Fie
that interes
● Maintain and enhance tree
canopy
● Add more multi-use paths in
parks
● Add more restrooms
● Add more trees
● Add more benches and
places to sit
● Bike pump track
● Add more quiet areas for
connection to nature and
relaxation (res. only)
● Add more shade (res. only)
● Add more picnic areas
● Add more community
gardens
Question #3
● Strongly Agree: Bike pump track, maintain & enhance tree canopy, add more multi-use paths in parks
● Agree: Aquatics (by a lot), public art.
● Disagree: Opportunities to buy food or drink.
● Strongly Disagree: Access to WiFi, food/drink, lacrosse fields, and more rental spaces.

Question #5
● Strongly Ag
in parks
● Agree: Aqu
● Disagree: O
● Strongly Di
Question #5
DRAFT Community Outreach
955

APPENDIX I
464 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
● Strongly Agree: Bike pump track, maintain & enhance tree canopy, add more multi-use paths in parks
● Agree: Aquatics (by a lot), public art.
● Disagree: Opportunities to buy food or drink.
● Strongly Disagree: Access to WiFi, food/drink, lacrosse fields, and more rental spaces.

Question #7
● Strongly Ag
in parks
● Agree: Aqu
● Disagree: O
● Strongly Di
Question #9
● Strongly Agree: Bike pump track, maintain & enhance tree canopy, add more multi-use paths in parks
● Agree: Aquatics (by a lot), public art.
● Disagree: Opportunities to buy food or drink.
● Strongly Disagree: Access to WiFi, food/drink, lacrosse fields, and more rental spaces. *Resident only data
Question #9

NEXT STEPS
● Stakeholder Interviews, Focus groups
○ Schools - BRSSD & private schools
○ Seniors
○ Open Space Park Users
○ Dog Owners
○ Youth
○ Inclusivity Improvements
● Park Visitor Tallys
● Open Space Management Plan RFP
○ Recreational uses
○ Trail Assessment
○ Sustainability
○ Wildfire Risk Mitigation

APPENDIX I DRAFT
956

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 465 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

PARKS DISCUSSION
● What are the key takeaways from the survey responses? ● What information do we still need?
● Brainstorm
DRAFT Community Outreach
957

APPENDIX I
466 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Parks & Recreation Commission
November 3, 2021

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
1 Purpose To discuss park-specific DRAFT recommendations & public response to-date Introductions + Schedule
Efforts to Date
Park Typologies + Amenities
Park-Specific DRAFT Recommendations
Park Opportunity Sites DRAFT Recommendations
Next Steps
Discussion
AGENDA
2 PROCESS
Push out 1 month
3 Push out 1
BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
4 APPENDIX I DRAFT
958

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 467 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

CITY-WIDE PARK PROXIMITY
Neighborhood Park Tier 1
Neighborhood Park Tier 2
Schools (JUA)
Trailhead
Community Park
1/8 mile
1/4 mile
1/4 mile
1/4 mile
1/2 mile
Park Access Radii
Park
Trailhead
5 CITY-WIDE PARK CONNECTIVITY

PEDESTRIANS
Source: 2016 Comprehensive
Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
6 CITY-WIDE PARK CONNECTIVITY

BICYCLISTS
Source: 2016 Comprehensive
Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
Class I
Class II
Class III
7 ASSESSMENTS
● Existing Conditions
● Community Engagement
○ Online Survey
○ Focus Groups
⎼ Park-specific: Hidden Canyon 10/18, Ralston Ranch 10/20 ● Benchmarking + Trends
● Park Typologies
8 DRAFT Community Outreach
959

APPENDIX I
468 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
COMMUNITY INPUTS: SURVEY
Top 5 Reasons to Visit a park, recreation, or open space 90%
60% 55% 47% 45%
Top 6 Amenities positively-rated To Enhance the Belmont Park Experience 65% 58% 56% 51% 51% 51%

BELMONT RESIDENTS ON PARKS
9 COMMUNITY INPUTS: FOCUS GROUPS

DOG OWNERS
More shade
More seating
More gathering and
social spaces
More waste bins
Water fountain

SENIORS
More seating
More shade
Generally happy with
existing parks
YOUTH
Hang-out space for
youth/teens
Add seating
Larger-sized play
equipment
Community tables
Game areas

INCLUSIVITY
Inclusive play elements
sized larger (not just for
small children)
Sensory and tactile play
Protected spaces, but
with multiple sightlines
and access points

SCHOOL DISTRICT/

YOUTH SPORTS
Incentivize school field
improvements
Continued growth in
sports field demand
Interest in synthetic turf
10 Amenity:

Basketball Court *
Multi-use Athletic Field *
Playground *
Reservable Picnic Area
Tennis Court *
AMENITIES: BENCHMARKED

0.0 AMENITY 1.0

AMENITY

0.50 AMENITY
BELMONT Burlingame San Carlos Saratoga California National Population Range
* includes amenities at Belmont’s Schools (JUA) sites
per 1,000 RESIDENTS
No CA or National benchmark
11 PARK TYPOLOGIES
Community Park Neighborhood Park
Tier 2
Neighborhood Park
Tier 1
● Generate the most visitors
● High use intensities
● Accessed by foot, bike, or car
● Large capture area (1/2 mile radius)
● Interacting with nature, gathering, and
recreation
● Local and nearby neighborhoods
● Accessed by foot, bike, and car
● Medium capture area (1/4 mile radius)
● Interacting with nature or gathering
● Local neighborhood
● Mainly accessed by foot or by bike
● Small capture area (1/8 mile radius)

STANDARD BASELINE AMENITIES

1. Natural Environment

2. Seating

3. Play Amenity

4. Picnic Opportunity

5. Multi-purpose Flexible Space

6. Recreation Amenity

7. Off-Street Parking

8. Permanent Restroom

9. Multi-use Athletic Field or Community
Facility

STANDARD BASELINE AMENITIES

1. Natural Environment

2. Seating

3. Play Amenity

4. Picnic Opportunity

5. Multi-purpose Flexible Space

6. Recreation Amenity

STANDARD BASELINE AMENITIES

1. Natural Environment

2. Seating

3. Identifiable Amenity
12 APPENDIX I DRAFT
960

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 469 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

AMENITIES
Nature Gathering Nature Gathering Recreation
Amenity
Trees /
shade
relax gather Multi-use
path
All abilities dog bike
playground
Multi-use
lawn
Trees + Shade Natural Environment Gathering Area Multi-use Paths Multi-use Flex Space All-Abilities Play Dog Park Pump Track Seating
Nature + Play
+ Gathering
Play Amenity Recreation
Amenity
Recreation +
Play Amenity
??? Amenity
Pickleball
13 AMENITIES: BELMONT IDEAL
Benchmarked Amenity
2021 2035
All-Abilities Playground + 1 0
Basketball Court (Full) 0 + 2
Basketball Court (Half) 0 + 2
Multi-Use Athletic Field + 1 + 2
Play Element + 3 0
Playground 0 + 2
Reservable Picnic Area,
Small + 2 + 1
Reservable Picnic Area,
Large + 1 0
Tennis Court + 2 + 1
Priority Amenity
2021 2035
Community Garden + 1 0
Dog Park + 1 0
Dog Parklet + 2 0
Pump Track (Bike Park) + 1 0
Skate Park + 1 0
Water Play, Pool + 1 0
Water Play, Spray Park + 1 0
Secondary Amenity
2021 2035
Fitness Equipment Cluster + 1 0
Handball Court / Wall Ball 0 + 1
Horseshoe Pit / Bocce Ball
Court 0 + 1
Outdoor Classroom + 1 0
Performance Space 0 0
Teen Outdoor Space + 2 0
Volleyball Court + 1 0
Priority Amenities were highly ranked in community outreach 14

RECOMMENDATIONS SPECTRUM
Existing
Master Plan
Minor
Improvements
Upgraded or
New Amenity
Park
Redesign
Undeveloped
Parks
New Park
Opportunity
Master Plans
recently created
Extensive
community input
Recommendation:

Implement Master
Plan
Parks recently
developed or in
very good
condition
Minor
improvements to
maintain
high-quality
Current park
functioning well
New amenity to
meet identified
needs
Upgrade existing
amenity to meet
identified needs
No
change-in-use
Rethink
accessibility and
park layout
Park Master Plan
process
Existing parks are
undeveloped
Proposed
recommendations
to amenitize site
City-owned property
To fill gaps in park
proximity
Proposed
recommendations to
amenitize site
Barrett Community
Twin Pines
College View
Davey Glen
Patricia Wharton
Semeria
Wakefield
Alexander
Belameda
Belmont Sports
McDougal
O’Donnell
Cipriani
Hallmark
Hastings
Hidden Canyon
Ralston Ranch
Ralston & Old County
Oak Knoll
Alameda de las Pulgas
Belmont Village
Specific Plan
15 RECOMMENDATIONS: BARRETT COMMUNITY

EXISTING MASTER PLAN

10. Trees + Shade

3. Pool 4. Splash Park

7. Synthetic
Athletic Field

2. Dog Parklet

6. Community
Center

1. Parking : 5. Playground : 8. Multi-use Sports Court : 9. Picnic Area 16 DRAFT Community Outreach
961

APPENDIX I
470 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: BELAMEDA

UPGRADED/NEW AMENITY

1. Multi-use Path

3. Learn-to-Ride
Loop
f. Fitness
Equipment

2. Teen Outdoor
Space
4 + 5. Planting
Areas
Seating : Planting : High-Quality Landscape
17 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: BELMONT SPORTS

UPGRADED/NEW AMENITY

6. Synthetic
Athletic Fields

3. Fitness
Equipment 2. Pump Track

4. Picnic Tables 5. Planting Areas

1. Gathering
Space
Seating
18 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: O’DONNELL

UPGRADED/NEW AMENITY

3. Spray Element

2. BBQs 1. Reservable
Picnic Area
Planting : High-Quality Landscape
19 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: HIDDEN CANYON
OPTION A: NATURE-ORIENTED

UNDEVELOPED PARK

3. Community
Garden

4. Outdoor
Classroom
b. Seating /
Gathering Space

1. ADA Parking : 2. Parking : Accessible : Seating : Planting : Shade d. Picnic Area
c. Play + Outdoor
Experience
Entrance

4. Permanent
Restroom
20 APPENDIX I DRAFT
962

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 471 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: HIDDEN CANYON
OPTION B: DOG PARKLET

UNDEVELOPED PARK

2. Parking 4. Permanent
Restroom 3. Dog Park
d. Picnic Area b. Gathering Space
+ Seating

1. ADA Parking : Accessible : Seating : Planting : Shade c. Play + Outdoor
Experience
Entrance
21 PUBLIC RESPONSE: HIDDEN CANYON ○ Poor maintenance condition noted currently, and more of a concern if increased amenities at site
○ Concerned about vehicular access (traffic volume and speed, parking) ○ Many participants voiced support to keep the space natural and quiet ○ Phased implementation supported in order to manage traffic concerns ○ Picnic tables, seating, and child outdoor play amenity generally supported 22 VIRTUAL FOCUS GROUP MONDAY 10/18
DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: RALSTON RANCH

UNDEVELOPED PARK
d. Picnic Tables
f. Dog Parklet 1. Walking Paths
b. Seating c. Play Element
e. Gathering Space
Accessible : Trees : Planting
23 PUBLIC RESPONSE: RALSTON RANCH
24 VIRTUAL FOCUS GROUP WEDNESDAY 10/20
○ Walking paths and seating supported by multiple participants ○ Neighborhood residents generally against a dog-oriented amenity ○ Maintain and increase trees
○ Respect natural environment in any proposed changes
○ Traffic, specifically exiting Ralston Ranch Rd, considered negative to residents ○ Child play element supported
DRAFT Community Outreach
963

APPENDIX I
472 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

PARK OPPORTUNITY SITES
Ralston Ave +
Old County Rd
+ Belmont Village
Specific Plan
Oak Knoll
Alameda de las
Pulgas
Park Proximity Map
25 DRAFT OPPORTUNITY: RALSTON & OLD COUNTY

INTERIM PLACEMAKING OPPORTUNITY

1. Dog Parklet 2. Placemaking
a. Gateway
planting b. Seating c. Skate Park Skate Park

3. Public Art
Accessible : Planting
26 DRAFT OPPORTUNITY: OAK KNOLL

NEW PARK OPPORTUNITY
b. Benches c. Play Element
Accessible : Planting
27 DRAFT OPPORTUNITY: ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS

NEW PARK OPPORTUNITY
b. Benches c. Play Element

1. Walking Paths
Accessible : Planting
28 APPENDIX I DRAFT
964

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 473 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
PUBLIC RESPONSE: RECOMMENDATIONS
29 PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED OCTOBER 2021
○ Multiple comments in support of Pump Track (Bike Park) at Belmont Sports Complex (requests to include and exclude bike amenity at Hidden Canyon) ○ Positive response to proposed park at Alameda de las Pulgas (Opportunity Site) ○ Seating and Permanent Restroom for Hidden Canyon, add bike repair station ○ Request for more Youth- and Teen-oriented spaces
○ Splash park (water play) at O’Donnell not encouraged
○ Yes to Bocce ball (multiple locations)
○ Request for dog-oriented amenities, limited support for proposed sites ○ Maintain natural environs on undeveloped parks
○ Neighbors support park creation at summit of Oak Knoll Drive Upcoming Community Input Opportunities
○ Online Comments and Feedback
○ City Council Meeting: November 23
PROS Plan: Implementation
○ Prioritization
○ Action Plan
Upcoming Meetings
○ Focus Groups (May)
○ Council of Cities Presentation May 27 at 6 pm
○ June Commission Meeting; Focus on Parks (not Open Space) data, priorities ○ July and August Commission Meetings Combined (third week in July) Previous Meetings:
○
○ April 6, Planning Commission
○ March 29, Belmont Rotary Presentation
○ March 9, Belmont City Council Meeting
○ March 3, PROS Advisory Meeting
○ March 2, BRSSD Superintendent Meeting
○ Feb 3, Park and Rec Commission Meeting
■ Survey live for 4 weeks (end April 30th) another constant contact the week before PROS Groups - Wednesday May 19th 9-10:45am June Commission and Focus Groups findings update/progress, next AC Meeting

NEXT STEPS
30 Comment and
provide feedback at
BelmontPROSplan.com
[email protected]
All Park-Specific Recommendations available on PROS Plan website. e

DRAFT RECOMMENDATION FEEDBACK
31 QUESTIONS + COMMENTS
from P&R Commission
32 DRAFT Community Outreach
965

APPENDIX I
474 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

COMMENTS
from General Public
20 minutes allotted for comments on agenda items
Speaker time will be limited based on number of persons wishing to comment Questions will not be answered live in this meeting
Visit BelmontPROSplan.com or
email [email protected]
to comment and provide feedback
33 THANK YOU!
34 BelmontPROSplan.com
[email protected]
35 APPENDIX I DRAFT
966

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 475 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Park and Recreation Commission Meeting
May 4, 2022

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
1 PROS Plan purpose:

Set the framework for decision makers in the planning,
maintenance, development, and/or rehabilitation of Belmont’s Parks and open space system for a 15 year horizon.

Purpose To discuss the Open Space Management Plan and provide guidance for the future of Belmont’s Open Spaces
Open Space Management Plan
○ Overview of planning process and tasks
○ Results of the environmental and recreation assessments ○ Overview on Management alternatives development
Schedule + Next Steps
AGENDA
2 Today we’re talking about these tasks:

1. Review of existing information

2. Develop goals and policies

3. Conduct environmental assessment

4. Conduct recreational assessment

5. Develop Management Alternatives and recommendations
3 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
4 WRA Team
WRA Staff Experience Summary Role on Belmont
OSMP
Leslie Lazarotti Environmental regulatory compliance for public access/habitat restoration projects
for San Francisco Parks and Recreation,
San Mateo County Parks and Recreation,
and East Bay Regional Parks District.

Principal in charge,
regulatory strategy
John Baas, Ph.D. Open space planning for Midpen, San
Mateo, Marin and Sonoma counties, and
California Dept. of Water Resources.

Project Manager,
recreation ecology, trail
conditions assessment,
wildfire hazard
assessment
Ivy Poisson Open space planning for Sonoma County
Regional Parks, botanical surveys for
Midpen.

Plant and vegetation
communities evaluation
Brian Kearns,
Ph.D.

Specialized expertise in bird surveys,
wildlife evaluations for San Mateo County
Parks, East Bay Regional Park District,
and City of Cupertino Parks & Rec.

Wildlife evaluation and
trail condition
assessment
DRAFT Community Outreach
967

APPENDIX I
476 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
5 WRA Team (continued)
WRA Staff Experience Summary Role on Belmont OSMP
Rob Schell Expertise on biology of the
California red-legged frog, California
tiger salamander and vernal pool
species.

Senior advisor for wildlife
evaluations for the
environmental assessment
Robin Graham Protected area planning for
GGNRA. Expertise includes impacts
from recreation, visitor use
assessments, stakeholder
engagement, and visitor
management.

Trail condition assessment,
visitor management,
recreation ecology
Jason Mills Experience with wildfire hazard
reduction, and wildfire
recovery/revegetation for Sonoma,
Sonoma County Agricultural
Preservation and Open Space
District, and Napa Firewise Council.

Wildfire hazard analysis
advice for environmental
assessment

OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
6 Open Space areas addressed in the OSMP

OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Adoption of the OSMP will enable the city to:
• Augment existing goals and policies pertaining to open space • Commit to specific “implementation actions”
○ Actions may require funding, and possible environmental compliance and permitting requirements.
7 1. The OSMP is based on:
○ review of city planning documents
○ review of historical information
○ environmental & recreation assessments
○ community input

2. A forward looking plan for the next 15 years
8 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN

APPENDIX I DRAFT
968

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 477 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Key issues addressed:
9 Environmental
Sustainability
Balanced
Recreational
Uses + Trail
Management
Natural Hazard
Mitigation
● The environmental assessment is:
○ Is a master planning level study to
support development of goals, policies,
and implementation actions.
○ Involves limited fieldwork to identify
any environmental concerns that will
require detailed field based evaluation.
10 Environmental Assessment
● The environmental assessment is not:
○ A research project
○ A complete vegetation survey of the entire
open space areas
○ A series of wildlife surveys to verify the
presence of common or sensitive wildlife
species.

Environmental Assessment
11 Desktop Review and Field Assessment of:

1. Common & sensitive plant species

2. Common & sensitive animal species

3. Vegetation communities-naturally occurring and
exotic

4. Trail conditions
12 Environmental Assessment
Components
DRAFT Community Outreach
969

APPENDIX I
478 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Desktop Review of Environmental Conditions
● CNDDB records
● USFWS Information for Planning and Conservation Species ● CNPS Inventory records
● California Bird Species of Special Concern
● USFWS Critical Habitat Mapper
Field Assessment of Environmental Conditions (WDL and SJC)

1. Verify in the field vegetation communities identified in San Mateo County data (2021)

2. Assess conditions of trails

3. Determine if existing conditions provide suitable habitat for any special-status species

4. Assess baseline conditions of vegetation and wildlife habitat

5. Note any common wildlife and plant species observed 13 Environmental Assessment: Methods
Initial Field Assessment of Environmental Conditions
● 2 WRA staff performed field assessments on March 8, 21, and 22 ● Traversed over 10 miles of official and unofficial trails 14 Environmental Assessment: Results

1. Verify in the field vegetation communities at Waterdog Lake 15 Environmental Assessment: Results
16 1. Verify in the field vegetation communities
San Juan Canyon
Environmental Assessment:

Results

APPENDIX I DRAFT
970

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 479 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

2. Assess Trail Conditions:

A. Trail erosion
B. Presence of multiple trails or trail sections in a single area C. Presence of legacy trails
D. Stream crossings
17 Environmental Assessment: Methods
Low erosion Medium erosion High erosion 18
Environmental Assessment: Trail Condition
Findings
Level of Erosion Waterdog Lake San Juan Canyon Totals
Low 86 (61%) 5 (42%) 91 (59%)
Medium 39 (28%) 6 (50%) 45 (29%)
High 16 (11%) 1 (8%) 17 (12%)
Total 141 (100%) 12 (100%) 153 (100%)
● Western (Pacific) pond turtle
● Olive-sided flycatcher
● White-tailed kite
● San Francisco (saltmarsh) common yellowthroat
● Hoary bat
● American badger
19 Environmental Assessment: Findings
Sensitive Wildlife with Moderate or higher potential to occur 3. During the March site visits we confirmed presence of these two special-status species

1. Western leatherwood

2. San Francisco Dusky Footed Woodrat
20 Environmental Assessment: Findings
DRAFT Community Outreach
971

APPENDIX I
480 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

4. Assess baseline conditions of vegetation and wildlife habitat A. Most vegetation is in good condition.

B. Low potential to occur for many sensitive plant and animal species identified during “desktop” review
C. Recreation use generally not having environmental impacts a. Exception: trails that go directly through stream channels that are not “protected” with erosion stabilization features
D. Both open space areas have low potential to serve as wildlife migration corridors.
21 Environmental Assessment: Findings
● California towhee
● Spotted towhee
● Wrentit
● California quail
● Anna’s hummingbird
● Common Merganser
● Mallard
● Red-shouldered hawk
22 Environmental Assessment: Findings

5. Common Wildlife Identified
● Black-tailed mule deer
● Western fence lizard
● Pond turtle
● Bullthistle
● Annual hairgrass
● Sticky monkeyflower
● Yerba santa
● Blue gum eucalyptus
● Fennel
● French broom
● Toyon
● Foxtail barley
● Goldfields
● Arroyo lupine
● Pineapple weed
● Bur clover
23 Environmental Assessment: Findings

5. Common Plants Identified
● Gold back fern
● Harding grass
● Western choke cherry
● Coast live oak
● California blackberry
● Common snowberry
24 Environmental Assessment: Trail
Critical and Possible Recommendations

1. Critical: Address severe erosion areas

2. Critical: Protect stream crossings or reroute

3. Consider potential further assessment to determine
disposition of trails for appropriate management:
○ Maintain as is
○ Re-construct in the current, exact location for hydrology ○ Construct new segment along the same general route
○ Re-route entire trail
○ Seasonal closures
○ Permanent closures

APPENDIX I DRAFT
972

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 481 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Recreation Use Assessment
25 Desktop Review

1. Note potential safety issues during trail conditions assessment.

2. Review local and regional trends in open space recreational uses.

3. Consider opportunities to improve trail user experiences.

Field Assessment of Environmental Conditions
● 2 WRA staff performed 2 additional days of field assessments focused on trail mapping
26 Recreational Use Assessment: Methods
● Many trails or trail segments lack adequate signage and wayfinding.
● There are multiple parallel, braided trails.
● There are multiple areas where visitor experiences could be enhanced.
27 Recreational Use Assessment: Findings

1. Adding calming features to reduce speed, and landings for respite

2. Consider separate, new single use trails to enhance visitor experiences

3. For parallel, braided trails, designate as single use, one-way use or close if unnecessary
28 Recreational Use Assessment:

Recommendations
DRAFT Community Outreach
973

APPENDIX I
482 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Wildfire Hazard Assessment
29 30
Wildland Fire Assessment: Methods

1. Desktop review of aerial photography

2. Observe fuel conditions from trails

3. Review city’s recent fuel treatment activity

4. Evaluate wildfire hazards and ignition potential
based on vegetation types mapped and observed
2021 Completed
Completed 2021
Completed 2021
Completed 2019 Completed 2019
Completed Completed 2019
Completed 2020
Future 2021
Completed 2020
2020
Completed 2021

APPENDIX I DRAFT
974

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 483 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
33 Wildland Fire Assessment: Findings

1. Calfire rates the two open space areas as very high (WDL) and high for SJC

2. Majority of vegetation in WDL and SJC open space areas are ranked low hazard and low ignition potential.

3. Many of the WDL open space lands immediately adjacent to residential areas subjected to recent fuel reduction.
34 Wildland Fire Assessment:

Recommendations

1. Consider developing an annual fuel
treatment plan

2. Continue maintaining treatment areas

3. Conduct a field based evaluation of
conditions in SJC open space for
possible treatments
Management Alternatives Update
35 1. The “Base” Plan is a set of goals, policies, and implementation actions. a. Added new policies and goals based on WRA’s expertise and experience. b. Many of these originated from city planning documents.

2. One alternative provides additional recreational policies (e.g. e-bikes)

3. One alternative provides additional habitat protection and restoration policies.
36 Task 6: Management Alternatives
DRAFT Community Outreach
975

APPENDIX I
484 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

1. Publish Draft Environmental Use Assessment.

2. Publish Draft Recreation Use Assessment.

3. Publish Draft Management Alternatives.

4. Prepare Draft Open Space Management Plan.

5. Solicit Public Feedback.

6. Plan adoption.
37 Next Steps
38 Continuing Community
Input Opportunities

SCHEDULE
● Email to [email protected]
● May 31st PROS Advisory Committee
● OSMP Event planned for mid-June
THANK YOU!
39 www.BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]

COMMISSION
Q + A
40 APPENDIX I DRAFT
976

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 485 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
PUBLIC

COMMENTS
41 COMMISSION

COMMENTS
42 Push out 1 month
BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
43 DRAFT Community Outreach
977

APPENDIX I
486 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
3 Parks & Recreation Commission
July 6, 2022

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
1 PROS Plan purpose:

Set the framework for decision makers in the planning,
maintenance, development, and/or rehabilitation of Belmont’s Parks and open space system for a 15 year horizon.

Purpose To review and recommend the PROS Plan to the City Council PROS Plan
● Process
● Vision
● Recommendations
● Open Space Management Plan
● Implementation Strategy
AGENDA
2 Process: GUIDING PRINCIPLES

1. Provide equitable access to resources and activities across the entire city

2. Promote inclusion to people of all backgrounds, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic position, or physical/cognitive ability

3. Make all users feel welcome and safe

4. Offer services and activities across a range of interests, abilities, and ages

5. Reflect our commitment to environmental resilience and sustainability

6. Respect the beauty and importance of our natural resources

7. Advance community health and well-being

8. Foster a sense of community and encourage social interaction

9. Provide well maintained and actively managed facilities

10. Adapt to changing conditions and needs

11. Utilize transparent community process to inform decisions 4 APPENDIX I DRAFT
978

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 487 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Process: AN ENGAGED COMMUNITY
7 How the COMMUNITY informed and influenced the PROS Plan (a sample)

1. Open Space Management Plan
a. WRA Environmental Consultants
b. PROS Plan schedule extended

2. Proposed uses at undeveloped parks
a. Hidden Canyon Park + Ralston Ranch Park

3. Opportunity Site: Oak Knoll Drive

4. Additional Advisory Committee meeting
5 Process: SCHEDULE Process: AN ENGAGED COMMUNITY
6 Community Survey
PROS Advisory Committee
5 meetings in 2021 + 2022
Focus Groups
11 in 2021 Emails + Comments
Over 1,500(2020 to June 2022)
Emails to [email protected] and/or P&R
Commission, and Comments via project website
City Council presentations
3 in 2021 + 2022 * Next Meeting:

July 12th
Pop-up participation
at City events
Concerts in the Park
Movie Night in the Park
Egg Hunt
Celebrate the Music
etc.

Open Space
Open House
Parks and Recreation Commission
Updates at every P&R Commission meeting
19 meetings in 2020 + 2021 + 2022
Project
Website
3,800+
unique visitors
8 PROS PLAN VISION
Re-imagine the Belmont Parks, Recreation, and Open
Space (PROS)system to create the City’s Backyard that
fosters inclusive, experiential, and nurturing public
spaces by setting the framework for decision makers in the planning, maintenance, development, and/or rehabilitation, implementable over a 15 year horizon.

DRAFT Community Outreach
979

APPENDIX I
488 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
The Ideas: BIG IDEAS + GOALS
11 The City
as Your
Backyard
Goal 1. Support a connected Belmont by encouraging a robust pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit network unifying PROS sites across the City.

Goal 2. Foster a healthy community through spaces, amenities, programs, and public art to encourage physical activity, social interaction, and highlight Belmont’s culture and history.

Goal 3. Expand and enhance the existing PROS system to meet evolving community needs by establishing new uses, improved spaces, and recreation amenities that highlight the natural environment.

Vision: COMMUNITY THEMES
9 Amenities for Social
+ Physical Activity
More Seating
Opportunities
Physical
Connections
Amenities for
Diverse Interests
Accessible for
All Abilities
Create More
with Less
Connecting
with Nature
Available for Many
Uses + Users
Natural
Resources
Honor Belmont’s
Unique Landscape
Vision: BIG IDEAS + GOALS
10 Prioritize
Environmental
+ Financial
Sustainability
Celebrate
the Outdoors
Outdoor
Recreation
for All
The City
as Your
Backyard
Vision: BIG IDEAS + GOALS
12 Outdoor
Recreation
for All
Goal 4. Leverage assets of the PROS system to support community health providing diverse, equitable, and inclusive spaces and amenities with accessible routes.

Goal 5. Revitalize the PROS system to be adaptable, flexible, and supportive of many uses and users now and into the future.

Goal 6. Partner with a variety of agencies, departments, volunteer groups, other entities, and the community to actualize PROS Plan goals and policies.

APPENDIX I DRAFT
980

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 489 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Vision: CITY-WIDE PARK ACCESS
15 Access Radii
¼ mile Neighborhood Park Tier 1
¼ mile Undeveloped Park
½ mile Neighborhood Park Tier 2
Entire City Community Park
● Interconnected Park
System
○ Amenities
distributed across
the system
● Prioritize pedestrian
and bicycle access to
green spaces
○ Identify areas with
low access
○ Promote ped and
bike infrastructure
to reduce areas
with low access
○ Investigate new
park opportunity
sites in areas with
low access
Vision: BIG IDEAS + GOALS
13 Celebrate
the Outdoors
Goal 7. Develop and implement an Open Space Management Plan.

Goal 8. Expand educational opportunities in parks and open spaces to highlight the local ecosystems.

Goal 9. Continue to enrich Belmont’s outdoor recreation opportunities with trail improvements, volunteer collaborations, and wayfinding features.

Vision: BIG IDEAS + GOALS
14 Prioritize
Environmental
+ Financial
Sustainability
Goal 10. Nurture the ecological strength of the City’s natural resources through resource-efficient landscapes and operations.

Goal 11. Provide high-quality, actively-managed, and well-maintained PROS assets supported by a range of funding sources.

Goal 12. Prioritize sustainable, resilient, and responsible management and maintenance practices, improvements, and projects at PROS sites.

Recommendations: SYSTEM-WIDE STRATEGIES
16 ● Broad recommendations to impact the entire PROS system ● Organized under the Big Ideas and Goals
● Furthered by:
○ Strategic actions
○ Park-specific recommendations
○ Open Space Management Plan
74 Strategies
DRAFT Community Outreach
981

APPENDIX I
490 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Recommendations: NEW PARK OPPORTUNITY

OAK KNOLL DRIVE
b. Benches c. Play Element
Accessible : Planting
19 Community Feedback: Identified as an Opportunity Site via neighbor’s input, strong community support for new park “Safety Circle”
Signage
Recommendations: STRATEGIC ACTIONS
17 Inclusive +
All-Abilities Play
Social Gathering
Space
PROS Activation
Plan
“Pop-up” Park
Installations
Usage Study

RECOMMENDATIONS SPECTRUM
18 Recommendations: UNDEVELOPED PARK

HIDDEN CANYON PARK

4. Open Space
Gateway
e. Outdoor
Classroom
b. Seating
Opportunities

1. ADA Parking : 2. Parking : Accessible : Seating : Planting : Shade d. Picnic Area
c. Nature Play
Element

3. Restroom
20 Community Feedback: Community revised Option A
Nature-oriented, phase improvements per community request

APPENDIX I DRAFT
982

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 491 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
23 21
Recommendations: EXISTING PARK MASTER PLAN

TWIN PINES PARK

OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Open Space Management Plan identifies objectives, policies, and implementation actions for:

1. Environmental sustainability

2. Balanced recreation use

3. Natural hazard mitigation

4. Vegetation protection

5. Wildlife protection

6. Water resources

7. Science based management

8. Expanded implementation resources
22 1. Environmental Assessment

2. Recreational Use Assessment

3. Base Plan

4. Management Alternatives
24 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Plan consists of: Methods included:
● Desktop research
● Site visits
● Community and stakeholder input
DRAFT Community Outreach
983

APPENDIX I
492 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Key Takeaways

1. Overall habitat quality is high.

2. Existing nature-based recreational uses can continue on existing mapped and established, previously unmapped trails.

3. Continue wildfire fuel reduction efforts.
27 FINDINGS
Key Findings from Environmental Assessment, Recreation Use Assessment

1. Over 90 percent of the open space lands consist of native biological communities.

2. 11 special-status plant species and 7 special-status wildlife species have moderate/high potential to occur or are present.

3. Non-native species generally limited.

4. Trails represent about 1.3 percent of open space lands.

5. Approximately 50 stream crossings identified.

6. Less than 10% of trail erosion ratings were considered “high.”

7. Rates of participation in nature-based recreation are increasing. 25 FINDINGS
Key Findings Wildfire Hazard Assessment
Steep topography, weather, and the potential to
damage human life and structures
● Very high wildfire hazards for WDL
● High wildfire hazards for SJC
26 FINDINGS
28 OPEN SPACE THEMES
Objectives
Policies
Implementation
Actions
Natural
Hazard
Mitigation
Environmental
Sustainability
Objectives
Policies
Implementation
Actions
Balanced
Recreation
Use
Objectives
Policies
Implementation
Actions

APPENDIX I DRAFT
984

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 493 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
31 IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS
Recommendations based on:
● PROS Plan Big Ideas + Goals,
● Findings from WRA assessments,
● Public feedback
● Clear next steps for the City
Base Plan
Comprehensive set of objectives, policies and
implementation actions designed to:
● Protect sensitive resources
● Guide trail management and
manage recreation
● Mitigate the risk of natural hazards
29 BASE PLAN + MGMT ALTERNATIVES
Recreation Emphasis Alternative
Additional policy and implementation actions
related trails and recreational use
Habitat Emphasis Alternative
Additional policies and implementation actions
related to vegetation restoration and wildlife
protection
Mgmt Alt: COMMUNITY PREFERENCE
30 Advisory Committee #5 (5/31/22).

Poll question: Which Management Alternatives do you support? 35 responses (8 AC members + 27 participants)
Management Alternatives % of Vote
Base Plan (alone) 6%
Base Plan + Recreation Emphasis 37%
Base Plan + Habitat Emphasis 17%
Base Plan + Recreation Emphasis + Habitat Emphasis 40%

IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS
32 An implementation action is a discrete, measurable action that achieves a desired outcome.

Environmental
Sustainability
Ex. Improve
stream crossings
Balanced
Recreation
Use
Ex. Monitor
visitor use levels
Natural Hazard
Mitigation
Ex. Using grazing
reduce wildfire
fuels
DRAFT Community Outreach
985

APPENDIX I
494 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
35 FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS
● Develop recreation and volunteer restoration programs ● Examine portfolio of solutions for multi-use trail
experiences
Implementation Action Ratings
33 IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS
Easy Medium Hard
These actions can be
performed immediately under
existing City programs, funding,
or with minimal additional
effort.

These actions require additional
planning, equipment, staffing,
funding – either internal or
external, or other operational
changes.

These actions may require
substantial planning,
interagency coordination,
staffing, funding, or other
operational changes.
● Improve stream crossings (Hard)
● Fuels reduction plan (Medium)
● Monitor recreation use (Hard)
● Seasonal/weather dependent restrictions
on maintenance (Easy)
34 PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS

IMPLEMENTATION
36 ● PRIORITIZATION MATRIX
To prioritize park-specific recommendations
● FUNDING STRATEGIES + PARTNERSHIPS
Portfolio of funding for capital improvements, maintenance, and operations ● ACTION PLAN
for short term, long term, or ongoing

APPENDIX I DRAFT
986

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 495 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
THANK YOU!
39 www.BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]

PRIORITIZATION MATRIX
● To further PROS Plan goals
○ 12 goals
● To respond to community priority
○ N/A, Medium, High
● To serve an existing deficiency
○ Demographic group, Underserved area of
Belmont, Anticipated Areas of Increased
Residential Density, New use, Availability of
amenity/use, Resolve access issues
● To address an existing condition
○ N/A, Good, Fair, Poor, Critical or unsafe
37 The Document: PROS PLAN
38 PARKS & RECREATION

COMMISSION
Q + A
40 DRAFT Community Outreach
987

APPENDIX I
496 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Push out 1 month
BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
43 PUBLIC

COMMENTS
41 PARKS & RECREATION

COMMISSION

COMMENTS
42 APPENDIX I DRAFT
988

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 497 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
PROS PLAN PURPOSE:
● Study the existing PROS system: parks (developed and undeveloped), joint-use schools, and open spaces
● Present system-wide and park-specific prioritized recommendations ● Identify opportunities to increase parkland
● Develop a decision-making framework and implementation strategy

INTRODUCTION
3 Parks & Recreation Commission
January 10, 2024

PARKS, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACE
(PROS) MASTER PLAN
1 PROS PLAN VISION
Re-imagine the Belmont PROS system to create the City’s Backyard that fosters inclusive, experiential, and nurturing public spaces by setting the framework for decision makers in planning, maintenance, development, and/or rehabilitation, implementable over a 15 year horizon.

Meeting Purpose: Receive update on the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan (PROS Plan).

MEETING TOPICS:

1. Framework + Approach of PROS Plan

2. Document Organization and Components

3. PROS Strategies + Recommendations

4. Recap + Next Steps
AGENDA
2 GUIDING PRINCIPLES

1. Provide equitable access to resources and activities across the entire city

2. Promote inclusion to people of all backgrounds, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic position, or physical/cognitive ability

3. Make all users feel welcome and safe

4. Offer services and activities across a range of interests, abilities, and ages

5. Reflect our commitment to environmental resilience and sustainability

6. Respect the beauty and importance of our natural resources

7. Advance community health and well-being

8. Foster a sense of community and encourage social interaction

9. Provide well maintained and actively managed facilities

10. Adapt to changing conditions and needs

11. Utilize transparent community process to inform decisions 4 DRAFT Community Outreach
989

APPENDIX I
498 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
7 FRAMEWORK
5 Community Survey
PROS Advisory Committee
5 meetings in 2021 + 2022
Focus Groups
11 in 2021 Emails + Comments
Over 1,500(2020 to June 2022)
Emails to [email protected] and/or P&R
Commission, and Comments via project website
City Council presentations
4 in 2021 + 2022
Pop-up participation
at City events
Concerts in the Park
Movie Night in the Park
Egg Hunt
Celebrate the Music
etc.

Open Space
Open House
Parks and Recreation Commission
Updates at every P&R Commission meeting
19 meetings in 2020 + 2021 + 2022
Project
Website
3,800+
unique visitors

AN ENGAGED COMMUNITY COMMUNITY THEMES
6 Amenities for Social
+ Physical Activity
More Seating
Opportunities
Physical
Connections
Amenities for
Diverse Interests
Accessible for
All Abilities
Create More
with Less
Connecting
with Nature
Available for Many
Uses + Users
Natural
Resources
Honor Belmont’s
Unique Landscape
8 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION

APPENDIX I DRAFT
990

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 499 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Social Gathering
Space

SYSTEM-WIDE RECOMMENDATIONS
11 Inclusive +
All-Abilities Play
PROS Activation
Plan
“Pop-up” Park
Installations
Usage Study
Social Gathering
Space
Interconnect
Toolkit

ENVISIONING CITY-WIDE PARK ACCESS
9 Access Radius
¼ mile Neighborhood Park Tier 1
¼ mile Undeveloped Park
½ mile Neighborhood Park Tier 2
Entire City Community Park
Interconnected Park System
● Ensure amenities are well
distributed across the PROS
system
Prioritize Access to Green
Spaces
● Identify areas with low access
● Align with ongoing efforts to
promote pedestrian + bicycle
infrastructure
● Investigate new park
opportunity sites

STRATEGIES
10 ● Broad strategies to impact the entire PROS system
● Organized under the Big Ideas and Goals
● Furthered by:
○ System-wide Recommendations
○ Park-specific Recommendations
○ Open Space Recommendations
74 Strategies

PARK-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
12 1. Neighborhood Parks (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

2. Community Parks

3. Undeveloped Parks

4. Schools with Joint-Use Agreements

5. Opportunity Sites

6. Open Space
Recommendation magnitude is evaluated + contextualized by category:
○ Implement existing master plan
○ Minor improvement
○ Upgraded or new amenity
○ Park redesign
○ Undeveloped park
○ New park opportunity
DRAFT Community Outreach
991

APPENDIX I
500 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
EXAMPLE: IMPLEMENT MASTER PLAN

TWIN PINES PARK
EXAMPLE: UPGRADED OR NEW AMENITY
O’DONNELL PARK
EXAMPLE: MINOR IMPROVEMENTS

WAKEFIELD PARK
16 The Open Space Management Plan (OSMP) used a science-based technical approach to provide a comprehensive set of objectives, policies, and recommended actions designed to protect sensitive resources, guide trail and recreation management, and mitigate the risk of natural hazards. ● Site visits, mapping inventories, community input, City and County plans, relevant databases, peer-reviewed literature, an Environmental Assessment, and a Recreational Use Assessment informed three overarching themes:

OSMP PURPOSE
Environmental Sustainability Balanced Recreation Use Natural Hazard Mitigation Assessments evaluated the environmental conditions and risks to trails, streams, habitat, vegetation as well as the impacts of current recreational use on sensitive resources.

APPENDIX I DRAFT
992

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 501 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

IMPLEMENTATION
19 PRIORITIZATION MATRIX
To prioritize park-specific recommendations based on its ability to.. ● Further the 12 PROS Plan Goals
● Respond to community priority
● Serve an existing deficiency
● Address an existing condition
FUNDING STRATEGIES + PARTNERSHIPS
Portfolio of funding for capital improvements, maintenance, and operations

ACTION PLAN
Short term, long term, or ongoing
17 OSMP FINDINGS
Key Takeaways

1. Overall habitat quality is high.

2. Existing nature-based recreational uses can continue on established mapped and unmapped trails.

3. Continue wildfire fuel reduction efforts.

Priority - Tier 1 Recommendations
● Improve stream crossings (Hard)
● Seasonal/weather dependent restrictions on maintenance (Easy) ● Fuels reduction plan (Medium)
● Monitor recreation use (Hard)
Priority - Tier 2 Recommendations
● Nature-based recreation programs (Medium)
● Volunteer restoration programs (Easy)
● Trail calming features (Hard)
Easy Medium Hard
These actions can be
performed immediately
under existing City
programs, funding, or
with minimal additional
effort.

These actions require
additional planning,
equipment, staffing,
funding – either internal
or external, or other
operational changes.

These actions may
require substantial
planning, interagency
coordination, staffing,
funding, or other
operational changes.
18 The OSMP recommends further studies to guide open space improvements:
● Annual Fuel Reduction Plan
● Annual Trail Inventories
● Annual Recreation Usage Observation Studies
● Trail Design Guidelines (Specific to Belmont, or adopt an existing set from the State or other reputable source that includes ADA standards)
● Engineering Studies for Stream Crossing Projects

OSMP RECOMMENDED STUDIES
RECAP: REVISIONS
The PROS Plan was recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission on July 6, 2022 to the City Council for approval with the following amendments, now complete:

1. Consolidate the OSMP’s Base Plan and Management Alternatives objectives, policies, and implementation actions into a single plan.

2. Clearly present priority recommendations in the OSMP by theme - environmental sustainability, balanced recreation uses and trail management, and natural hazard mitigation.

3. Pursue the creation of dedicated parkland in downtown Belmont and the Belmont Village Specific Plan area in response to potential residential density increase in the area due to anticipated housing unit development as outlined in the 2023-2031 Housing Element update.

4. Apply consistent terminology to remove ambiguity.

5. Refine specific graphics for clarity.
20 DRAFT Community Outreach
993

APPENDIX I
502 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
23 www.BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
RECAP: CEQA
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Addendum to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared by WRA.

1. Required Approvals, Agreements, and Permits (expected - not an exhaustive list) a. Adoption of the PROS Plan (City)
b. Grading Permit (City)
c. Trail Stream Crossing Improvement Permits
i. Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (CA Department of Fish and Wildlife) ii. Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit (US Army Corps of Engineers) iii. 401 Water Quality Certification (CA Regional Water Quality Control Board)

2. Addendum Analysis + Findings
a. The Proposed Project would not result in new or substantially increased significant environmental impacts that were not previously disclosed in the 2017 EIR certified by the City.

3. Technical Studies
a. The Environmental Assessment is included in the OSMP. No further technical studies were required. 21 NEXT STEPS

1. Post documents on project website for community review.

2. Present at February Commission meeting.

3. Present to Council following Commission recommendation. 22 24
Base Plan: Initial Policies and Recommendations
+Recreation Emphasis Alternative
Additional policies and actions related trails and recreational use +Habitat Emphasis Alternative
Additional policies and actions related to vegetation restoration and wildlife protection The Base Plan and Alternatives were combined into ONE Management Plan based on feedback RECAP: OSMP
35 responses (8 AC members + 27 participants)
Poll: Which Management Alternatives do you support? % of Vote Base Plan (alone) 6%
Base Plan + Recreation Emphasis 37%
Base Plan + Habitat Emphasis 17%
Base Plan + Recreation Emphasis + Habitat Emphasis (combined) 40% May 31, 2022 (Advisory Committee #5)

ADD ONS

APPENDIX I DRAFT
994

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 503 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

ON THE WEB
Project website: home page button to documents + FAQ tab www.belmontprosplan.com
City website: home page banner and spotlight on P&R page www.belmont.gov
www.belmont.gov/departments/parks-and-recreation

SOCIAL MEDIA
P&R: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter
Citywide: Nextdoor, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn

OUTREACH UPDATE
3 EMAIL
Citywide eNews: Jan 12, Jan 19, + Feb 2
P&R eNews: Feb 5
Direct email: Jan 19

ANNOUNCEMENTS
P&R Commission: Jan 10 (agenda item - introduction) +
Feb 7 (agenda item - possible recommendation to Council) City Council: Jan 23 (verbal announcement from Mayor Mates) Parks & Recreation Commission
February 7, 2024

PARKS, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACE
(PROS) MASTER PLAN
1 PROS PLAN VISION
Re-imagine the Belmont PROS system to create the City’s Backyard that fosters inclusive, experiential, and nurturing public spaces by setting the framework for decision makers in planning, maintenance, development, and/or rehabilitation, implementable over a 15 year horizon.

AGENDA
2 MEETING PURPOSE

1. Receive an update on the PROS Plan

2. Possible recommendation to City Council

MEETING TOPICS
○ Document organization + framework
○ Strategies + recommendations
○ Recap revisions to date
○ EIR Addendum
○ Next steps

INTRODUCTION
4 PROS PLAN PURPOSE
Study the existing parks, recreation, and open space system ○ Identify gaps
○ Develop strategies
○ Present recommendations
○ Assess opportunities
○ Establish a framework for prioritization
that can be periodically revisited as resources become available + circumstances evolve DRAFT Community Outreach
995

APPENDIX I
504 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
7 OSMP FRAMEWORK
Purpose + Vision WHERE WE
ARE
Goal 7: Develop and implement an Open Space Management Plan (OSMP)

WHERE WE

WANT TO BE
Environmental Assessment Recreation Use Assessment Guiding Principles Needs Assessment WHERE WE ARE +
Objectives Policies
Environmental
Sustainability

HOW WE GET
THERE Prioritization
Balanced
Recreation Use
Natural Hazard
Mitigation
5 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION
6 PROS FRAMEWORK
Community Themes Big Ideas Goals

WHERE WE

WANT TO BE
Strategies Recommendations
System-Wide Park-Specific Opportunities Open Space

HOW WE GET
THERE Prioritization
Purpose + Vision Guiding Principles WHERE WE
ARE Needs Assessment

ENVISIONING CITY-WIDE PARK ACCESS
8 An Interconnected Park System
○ Identify areas with low access
○ Ensure amenities are well distributed
○ Investigate new opportunities
○ Align with ongoing ped + bike efforts
Park Typologies

APPENDIX I DRAFT
996

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 505 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

PARK-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
11 STRATEGIES
9 STRATEGIES: BROAD INITIATIVES THAT WILL…
○ Accomplish the PROS goals
○ Benefit the PROS system as a whole
○ Provide guidance for future decisions
○ Align with existing planning efforts

SYSTEM-WIDE RECOMMENDATIONS
10 Inclusive +
All-Abilities Play
Activation Plan
Pop-up Park
Installations
Usage Study
Social Gathering
Space
Interconnect Toolkit
EXAMPLE: IMPLEMENT MASTER PLAN

TWIN PINES PARK
DRAFT Community Outreach
997

APPENDIX I
506 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
15 Environmental Sustainability Balanced Recreation Use Natural Hazard Mitigation OSMP: A SET OF OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, AND PRIORITIES BASED ON… ○ Environmental Assessment: trails, stream crossings, habitat, vegetation ○ Recreational Use Assessment: impact of recreation on sensitive resources ○ Site visits + data collected in the field
○ Relevant databases + peer-reviewed literature
○ Community input
○ Regional best practices, guidelines + regulations

OSMP PURPOSE
EXAMPLE: MINOR IMPROVEMENTS

WAKEFIELD PARK
EXAMPLE: UPGRADED OR NEW AMENITY
O’DONNELL PARK
16 OSMP FINDINGS
Easy
These actions can be performed
immediately under existing City
programs, funding, or with minimal
additional effort.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

1. Overall habitat quality is high

2. Existing nature-based recreational use can continue on established mapped + unmapped trails

3. Continue wildfire fuel reduction efforts

PRIORITIES
TIER 1
○ Improve stream crossings (H)
○ Seasonal/weather-dependent
restrictions on maintenance (E)
○ Fuels reduction plan (M)
○ Monitor recreation use (H)
TIER 2
○ Improve stream crossings (H)
○ Nature-based recreation
programs (M)
○ Volunteer restoration programs (E)
○ Trail calming features (H)
Medium
These actions require additional
planning, equipment, staffing, funding –
either internal or external, or other
operational changes.

Hard
These actions may require substantial
planning, interagency coordination,
staffing, funding, or other operational
changes.

APPENDIX I DRAFT
998

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 507 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
19 RECENT REVISIONS

THE PROS PLAN WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ON JULY 6, 2022 TO CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS…

1. Consolidate the OSMP’s Base Plan and Management Alternatives objectives, policies, and implementation actions into a single plan.

2. Clearly present priority recommendations in the OSMP by theme - environmental sustainability, balanced recreation uses and trail management, and natural hazard mitigation.

3. Pursue the creation of dedicated parkland in downtown Belmont and the Belmont Village Specific Plan area in response to potential residential density increase in the area due to anticipated housing unit development as outlined in the 2023-2031 Housing Element update.

4. Apply consistent terminology to remove ambiguity.

5. Refine specific graphics for clarity.
2024 COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
17 FURTHER STUDIES

NEXT STEPS
○ Utilize the methodology presented in the OSMP for ongoing observation + monitoring ○ Develop an annual Fuel Reduction Plan
○ Conduct engineering studies for future stream crossing projects ○ Adopt trail design guidelines
(specific to Belmont OR adopt an existing set from the State or other reputable source) 18 IMPLEMENTATION
PRIORITIZATION: BASED ON THE ABILITY OF A RECOMMENDATION TO… ○ Further the PROS goals
○ Respond to community priorities
○ Resolve an existing deficiency
○ Address an existing condition
FUNDING + PARTNERSHIPS: OPPORTUNITIES TO COLLABORATE ON… ○ Capital improvements
○ Maintenance + operations
ACTION PLAN: IMPORTANT TARGETS IN THREE TIME FRAMES…
○ Short term > Long term > Ongoing
20 REVISION SUMMARY

LAYOUT/FORMATTING/GRAPHICS

1. Color-coding/revising graphics, tables, images, figures + captions for consistency

2. Section/chapter headers renamed/reorganized for clarity/flow/readability

3. Information presented visually where needed

CONTENT/TEXT

1. Terms clearly defined + used consistently

2. Text became more concise while preserving content/details

3. Concepts/topics elaborated/reworded/explained further where needed

4. Reflects latest information available + recent meetings/outreach statistics NOT CHANGED: THE PRIMARY TAKEAWAYS OF THE DOCUMENT…
○ Inventory + needs assessment results
○ Recommendations + opportunity sites
○ Prioritization matrix + action plan
DRAFT Community Outreach
999

APPENDIX I
508 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
23 CEQA UPDATE

EIR ADDENDUM
○ The addendum analyzed the potential impacts from the PROS Plan as they relate to the impact discussed in the 2017 EIR

FINDINGS
○ Limited new impacts were less than significant
○ No new significant impacts that had not already been discussed - no additional review is needed ○ All mitigation measures will apply
The addendum will accompany the PROS Plan to City Council for approval 21 CEQA UPDATE

CEQA PATHWAY
○ The PROS Plan was reviewed according to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
○ Policies and actions in the PROS Plan (including OSMP) were largely already addressed in the General Plan
○ To retain consistency and reduce redundancy, an addendum to the 2017 EIR was prepared
○ The addendum and the 2017 EIR are programmatic – they address potential impacts that may result from the implementation of policies and actions
22 CEQA UPDATE
Addendum
PROS Plan

NEXT STEPS
24 1. PRESENT TO CITY COUNCIL FOLLOWING COMMISSION

RECOMMENDATION

2. AS SPECIFIC PROJECTS EMERGE, INITIATE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

3. PERIODICALLY REVISIT THE PROS PLAN AS RESOURCES BECOME AVAILABLE + PRIORITIES CHANGE

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1000

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 509 PARKS + RECREATION COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
25 www.BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
DRAFT Community Outreach
1001

APPENDIX I
510 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

PLANNING COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Presentation to Belmont Planning Commission
April 6, 2021

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
AGENDA
Purpose: Present the City of Belmont’s Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Master Plan Project
● The Team
● Project Overview
● Outreach Strategy
● Efforts to Date
● Next Steps
Consultant: Gates + Associates
City Staff: Belmont Parks & Recreation Department
Advisory Committee: Representatives of Belmont’s
neighborhoods, demographics, and interests
The Team
Set the framework for decision makers in the
planning, maintenance, development, and/or
rehabilitation of Belmont’s parks and open
space system and related recreational
programming for a 15 year horizon.

PURPOSE

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1002

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 511

PLANNING COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS

GOALS & GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Develop a Master Plan that:
○ Provide equitable access to resources and activities across the entire city
○ Promote inclusion to people of all backgrounds, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic position or
physical/cognitive ability
○ Offer services and activities across a range of interests, abilities, and ages
○ Reflect our commitment to environmental resilience and sustainability
○ Respect the beauty and importance of our natural resources ○ Advances community health and well-being
○ Foster a sense of community and encourage social interaction ○ Are well maintained and actively managed over time
○ Can adapt to changing conditions and needs
○ Utilize transparent community process to inform decisions

PROCESS
PROCESS: OUTREACH STRATEGY
Round #1 Round #2 Round #3
Where are we now?
What do we want?
Identify Key Issues
Input on unmet needs
How can we meet our
needs?
Deeper dive on trends
from Round #1
Park Recommendations
What are our
priorities?
Master Plan
recommendations and
criteria for prioritization
PROCESS: OUTREACH
Outreach to date:
- Brand (Logo/Tagline)
- Project Website
- Identify Community Enhancers
- Selected Our Channels
- Prepare for Launch of Round #1 Survey
- Develop an Advisory Committee
- Survey Design & Launch
DRAFT Community Outreach
1003

APPENDIX I
512 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

PLANNING COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
PROCESS: COMMUNITY OUTREACH
BelmontPROSPlan.com

ADVISORY COMMITTEE
● Role:
○ Insights: represent a diverse perspective of interests and ideas ○ Outreach: gather feedback and serve as community liaison to Master Plan team
○ Advise: review and provide input on the Master Plan process SURVEY
● General Information Requested:
○ Who are you? Age and Neighborhood
○ Frequency of park, open space and outdoor recreation
program use
○ Opinion on existing park, open space and outdoor
recreation programs
○ Types of improvements desired for:
■ Parks
■ Open Spaces
■ Outdoor Recreation Programs
PROCESS: OUTREACH EVENTS
- Project Website
- Advisory Committee Meetings (4 Total)
- Community-Wide Survey
- Stakeholder Focus Group Meetings (6 Total) - User Group or Topic (Open Space, Teens, etc., …)
- Neighborhood Meetings (6 Total)
- Community Pop Up Events (3 Total)
- Community Workshops (2 Total)
- Parks and Recreation Committee Presentation (4 Total) - Planning Commission Meeting
- City Council Presentation (3 Total)

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1004

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 513

PLANNING COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
Benchmarking of 3 comparable
Cities
○ San Carlos
○ Foster City
○ Burlingame
City Staff Park Usage Study
○ Open Space – Waterdog
○ Community Parks – McDougal
Park & Athletic Fields,
Belameda Park
○ Neighborhood Parks – Cipriani,
Alexander Park, Hallmark Park

BENCHMARKING EXISTING SITE ASSESSMENT

NEXT STEPS
- Ongoing Survey Awareness Campaign
- Stakeholder Interviews, Focus groups
- Review Preliminary Survey Trends
DRAFT Community Outreach
1005

APPENDIX I
514 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Presentation to City Council
March 9, 2021

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
AGENDA
Purpose: Provide an update on Parks ,Recreation and
Open Space (PROS) Master Plan and solicit Council
feedback
● Introductions
● Project Overview
● Outreach Strategy
● Efforts to Date
● Next Steps
Gates + Associates PROS Committee
Avery Lyford
Karl Mittelstadt
Craig Michaels
Brigitte Shearer
Daniel Ourtiague
Michael Moran
Peter Meier
Casey Case
Linda Gates
Kelley Lotosky
Melonie O’Sullivan

INTRODUCTIONS
Advisory Committee
Abby Sanders
Karen Haas-Foletta
Bob Stahl
Nelson Corteway
David Braunstein
Scott Sisemore
Susan Wright
Donna Sanchez
Dean Wilson
Lynn Bell
Sergio Raddaverro
Dan Deguara/Rui Bao
Set the framework for decision makers in the
planning, maintenance, development, and or
rehabilitation of Belmont’s Parks and open
space system and related recreational
programming for a 15 year horizon.

PURPOSE

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1006

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 515

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS

GOALS & GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Develop a Master Plan that:
○ Provide equitable access to resources and activities across the entire city
○ Promote inclusion to people of all backgrounds, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic position or
physical/cognitive ability
○ Offer services and activities across a range of interests, abilities, and ages
○ Reflect our commitment to environmental resilience and sustainability
○ Respect the beauty and importance of our natural resources ○ Advances community health and well-being
○ Foster a sense of community and encourage social interaction ○ Are well maintained and actively managed over time
○ Can adapt to changing conditions and needs
○ Utilize transparent community process to inform decisions

PROCESS
PROCESS: OUTREACH STRATEGY
Round #1 Round #2 Round #3
Where are we now?
What do we want?
Identify Key Issues
Input on unmet needs
How can we meet our
needs?
Deeper dive on trends
from Round #1
Park Recommendations
What are our
priorities?
Master Plan
recommendations and
criteria for prioritization
PROCESS: OUTREACH
Outreach to date:
- Brand (Logo/Tagline)
- Project Website
- Identify Community Enhancers
- Selected Our Channels
- Prepare for Launch of Round #1 Survey
- Develop an Advisory Committee
DRAFT Community Outreach
1007

APPENDIX I
516 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
PROCESS: COMMUNITY OUTREACH
BelmontPROSPlan.com

ADVISORY COMMITTEE
● Role:
○ Insights: represent a diverse perspective of interests and ideas ○ Outreach: gather feedback and serve as community liaison to Master Plan team
○ Advise: review and provide input on the Master Plan process

DRAFT SURVEY
● General Information Requested:
○ Who are you? Age and Neighborhood
○ Frequency of park, open space and outdoor recreation
program use
○ Opinion on existing park, open space and outdoor
recreation programs
○ Types of improvements desired for:
■ Parks
■ Open Spaces
■ Outdoor Recreation Programs
PROCESS: OUTREACH EVENTS
- Project Website
- Advisory Committee Meetings (4 Total)
- Community-Wide Survey
- Stakeholder Focus Group Meetings (6 Total) - User Group or Topic (Open Space, Teens, etc., …)
- Neighborhood Meetings (6 Total)
- Community Pop Up Events (3 Total)
- Community Workshops (2 Total)
- Parks and Recreation Committee Presentation (4 Total) - Planning Commission Meeting
- City Council Presentation (3 Total)

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1008

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 517

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Benchmarking of 3 comparable
Cities
○ San Carlos
○ Foster City
○ Burlingame
City Staff Park Usage Study
○ Open Space – Waterdog
○ Community Parks –
McDougal Park & Athletic
Fields, Belameda Park
○ Neighborhood Parks –
Cipriani, Alexander Park,
Hallmark Park

BENCHMARKING EXISTING SITE ASSESSMENT

NEXT STEPS
- Online Survey Launch
March 12, 2021
- Planning Commission
Presentation
April 6, 2021
- Ongoing Survey Awareness
Campaign
DRAFT Community Outreach
1009

APPENDIX I
518 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
City Council
(Study Session)
November 23, 2021

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
1 Purpose To discuss park-specific DRAFT recommendations & public response to-date Introductions + Schedule
Efforts to Date
Park Typologies + Amenities
Park-Specific DRAFT Recommendations
Park Opportunity Sites DRAFT Recommendations
Next Steps
Discussion
AGENDA
2 PROCESS
Push out 1 month
3 Push out 1
BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
4 APPENDIX I DRAFT
1010

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 519

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS

CITY-WIDE PARK PROXIMITY
Neighborhood Park Tier 1
Neighborhood Park Tier 2
Schools (JUA)
Trailhead
Community Park
1/8 mile
1/4 mile
1/4 mile
1/4 mile
1/2 mile
Park Access Radii
Park
Trailhead
5 CITY-WIDE PARK CONNECTIVITY

PEDESTRIANS
Source: 2016 Comprehensive
Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
6 CITY-WIDE PARK CONNECTIVITY

BICYCLISTS
Source: 2016 Comprehensive
Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
Class I
Class II
Class III
7 CITY-WIDE PARK CONNECTIVITY

PUBLIC TRANSIT
Source: 2016 Comprehensive
Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
8 DRAFT Community Outreach
1011

APPENDIX I
520 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
COMMUNITY INPUTS: SURVEY
Top 5 Reasons to Visit a park, recreation, or open space 90%
60% 55% 47% 45%
Top 6 Amenities positively-rated To Enhance the Belmont Park Experience 65% 58% 56% 51% 51% 51%

BELMONT RESIDENTS ON PARKS
10 COMMUNITY INPUTS: FOCUS GROUPS

DOG OWNERS
More shade
More seating
More gathering and
social spaces
More waste bins
Water fountain

SENIORS
More seating
More shade
Generally happy with
existing parks
YOUTH
Hang-out space for
youth/teens
Add seating
Larger-sized play
equipment
Community tables
Game areas

INCLUSIVITY
Inclusive play elements
sized larger (not just for
small children)
Sensory and tactile play
Protected spaces, but
with multiple sightlines
and access points

SCHOOL DISTRICT/

YOUTH SPORTS
Incentivize school field
improvements
Continued growth in
sports field demand
Interest in synthetic turf
11 Amenity:

Basketball Court *
Multi-use Athletic Field *
Playground *
Reservable Picnic Area
Tennis Court *
AMENITIES: BENCHMARKED

0.0 AMENITY 1.0

AMENITY

0.50 AMENITY
BELMONT Burlingame San Carlos Saratoga California National Population Range
* includes amenities at Belmont’s Schools (JUA) sites
per 1,000 RESIDENTS
No CA or National benchmark
12 EFFORTS TO DATE
● Existing Conditions Assessments
● Community Engagement
○ Online Survey
○ Focus Groups
⎼ Park-specific: Hidden Canyon 10/18, Ralston Ranch 10/20 ● Benchmarking + Trends
● Park Typologies
● Park-specific Recommendations
9 APPENDIX I DRAFT
1012

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 521

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS

PARK TYPOLOGIES
Community Park Neighborhood Park
Tier 2
Neighborhood Park
Tier 1
● Generate the most visitors
● High use intensities
● Accessed by foot, bike, or car
● Large capture area (1/2 mile radius)
● Interacting with nature, gathering, and
recreation
● Local and nearby neighborhoods
● Accessed by foot, bike, and car
● Medium capture area (1/4 mile radius)
● Interacting with nature or gathering
● Local neighborhood
● Mainly accessed by foot or by bike
● Small capture area (1/8 mile radius)

STANDARD BASELINE AMENITIES

1. Natural Environment

2. Seating

3. Play Amenity

4. Picnic Opportunity

5. Multi-purpose Flexible Space

6. Recreation Amenity

7. Off-Street Parking

8. Permanent Restroom

9. Multi-use Athletic Field or Community
Facility

STANDARD BASELINE AMENITIES

1. Natural Environment

2. Seating

3. Play Amenity

4. Picnic Opportunity

5. Multi-purpose Flexible Space

6. Recreation Amenity

STANDARD BASELINE AMENITIES

1. Natural Environment

2. Seating

3. Identifiable Amenity
13 AMENITIES
Nature Gathering Nature Gathering Recreation
Amenity
Trees /
shade
relax gather Multi-use
path
All abilities dog bike
playground
Multi-use
lawn
Trees + Shade Natural Environment Gathering Area Multi-use Paths Multi-use Flex Space All-Abilities Play Dog Park Pump Track Seating
Nature + Play
+ Gathering
Play Amenity Recreation
Amenity
Recreation +
Play Amenity
??? Amenity
Pickleball
14 AMENITIES: BELMONT IDEAL
Benchmarked Amenity
2021 2035
All-Abilities Playground + 1 0
Basketball Court (Full) 0 + 2
Basketball Court (Half) 0 + 2
Multi-Use Athletic Field + 1 + 2
Play Element + 3 0
Playground 0 + 2
Reservable Picnic Area,
Small + 2 + 1
Reservable Picnic Area,
Large + 1 0
Tennis Court + 2 + 1
Priority Amenity
2021 2035
Community Garden + 1 0
Dog Park + 1 0
Dog Parklet + 2 0
Pump Track (Bike Park) + 1 0
Skate Park + 1 0
Water Play, Pool + 1 0
Water Play, Spray Park + 1 0
Secondary Amenity
2021 2035
Fitness Equipment Cluster + 1 0
Handball Court / Wall Ball 0 + 1
Horseshoe Pit / Bocce Ball
Court 0 + 1
Outdoor Classroom + 1 0
Performance Space 0 0
Teen Outdoor Space + 2 0
Volleyball Court + 1 0
Priority Amenities were highly ranked in community outreach 15

RECOMMENDATIONS SPECTRUM
Existing
Master Plan
Minor
Improvements
Upgraded or
New Amenity
Park
Redesign
Undeveloped
Parks
New Park
Opportunity
Master Plans
recently created
Extensive
community input
Recommendation:

Implement Master
Plan
Parks recently
developed or in
very good
condition
Minor
improvements to
maintain
high-quality
Current park
functioning well
New amenity to
meet identified
needs
Upgrade existing
amenity to meet
identified needs
No
change-in-use
Rethink
accessibility and
park layout
Park Master Plan
process
Existing parks are
undeveloped
Proposed
recommendations
to amenitize site
City-owned property
To fill gaps in park
proximity
Proposed
recommendations to
amenitize site
Barrett Community
Twin Pines
College View
Davey Glen
Patricia Wharton
Semeria
Wakefield
Alexander
Belameda
Belmont Sports
McDougal
O’Donnell
Cipriani
Hallmark
Hastings
Hidden Canyon
Ralston Ranch
Ralston & Old County
Oak Knoll
Alameda de las Pulgas
Belmont Village
Specific Plan
16 Bolded Parks are discussed in this presentation as examples of the Recommendations Spectrum DRAFT Community Outreach
1013

APPENDIX I
522 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS: BARRETT COMMUNITY

EXISTING MASTER PLAN

10. Trees + Shade

3. Pool 4. Splash Park

7. Synthetic
Athletic Field

2. Dog Parklet

6. Community
Center

1. Parking : 5. Playground : 8. Multi-use Sports Court : 9. Picnic Area 17 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: BELAMEDA

UPGRADED/NEW AMENITY

1. Multi-use Path

3. Learn-to-Ride
Loop
f. Fitness
Equipment

2. Teen Outdoor
Space
4 + 5. Planting
Areas
Seating : Planting : High-Quality Landscape
18 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: BELMONT SPORTS

UPGRADED/NEW AMENITY

6. Synthetic
Athletic Fields

3. Fitness
Equipment 2. Pump Track

4. Picnic Tables 5. Planting Areas

1. Gathering
Space
Seating
19 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: O’DONNELL

UPGRADED/NEW AMENITY

3. Spray Element

2. BBQs 1. Reservable
Picnic Area
Planting : High-Quality Landscape
20 APPENDIX I DRAFT
1014

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 523

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: HIDDEN CANYON
OPTION A: NATURE-ORIENTED

UNDEVELOPED PARK

3. Community
Garden

4. Outdoor
Classroom
b. Seating /
Gathering Space

1. ADA Parking : 2. Parking : Accessible : Seating : Planting : Shade d. Picnic Area
c. Play + Outdoor
Experience
Entrance

4. Permanent
Restroom
21 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: HIDDEN CANYON
OPTION B: DOG PARKLET

UNDEVELOPED PARK

2. Parking 4. Permanent
Restroom 3. Dog Park
d. Picnic Area b. Gathering Space
+ Seating

1. ADA Parking : Accessible : Seating : Planting : Shade c. Play + Outdoor
Experience
Entrance
22 PUBLIC RESPONSE: HIDDEN CANYON ○ Poor maintenance condition noted currently, and more of a concern if increased amenities at site
○ Concerned about vehicular access (traffic volume and speed, parking) ○ Many participants voiced support to keep the space natural and quiet ○ Phased implementation supported in order to manage traffic concerns ○ Picnic tables, seating, and child outdoor play amenity generally supported 23 VIRTUAL FOCUS GROUP, MONDAY 10/18
DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: RALSTON RANCH

UNDEVELOPED PARK
d. Picnic Tables
f. Dog Parklet 1. Walking Paths
b. Seating c. Play Element
e. Gathering Space
Accessible : Trees : Planting
24 DRAFT Community Outreach
1015

APPENDIX I
524 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
PUBLIC RESPONSE: RALSTON RANCH
25 VIRTUAL FOCUS GROUP, WEDNESDAY 10/20
○ Walking paths and seating supported by multiple participants ○ Neighborhood residents generally against a dog-oriented amenity ○ Maintain and increase trees
○ Respect natural environment in any proposed changes
○ Traffic, specifically exiting Ralston Ranch Rd, considered negative to residents ○ Child play element supported

PARK OPPORTUNITY SITES
Ralston Ave +
Old County Rd
+ Belmont Village
Specific Plan
Oak Knoll
Alameda de las
Pulgas
Park Proximity Map
26 DRAFT OPPORTUNITY: RALSTON & OLD COUNTY

INTERIM PLACEMAKING OPPORTUNITY

1. Dog Parklet 2. Placemaking
a. Gateway
planting b. Seating c. Skate Park Skate Park

3. Public Art
Accessible : Planting
27 DRAFT OPPORTUNITY: OAK KNOLL

NEW PARK OPPORTUNITY
b. Benches c. Play Element
Accessible : Planting
28 APPENDIX I DRAFT
1016

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 525

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
DRAFT OPPORTUNITY: ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS

NEW PARK OPPORTUNITY
b. Benches c. Play Element

1. Walking Paths
Accessible : Planting
29 PUBLIC RESPONSE: RECOMMENDATIONS
30 PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM OCTOBER + NOVEMBER 2021
○ Multiple comments in support of Pump Track (Bike Park) at Belmont Sports Complex (requests to include and exclude bike amenity at Hidden Canyon) ○ Positive response to proposed park at Alameda de las Pulgas (Opportunity Site) ○ Seating and Permanent Restroom for Hidden Canyon, add bike repair station ○ Request for more Youth- and Teen-oriented spaces
○ Splash park (water play) at O’Donnell not encouraged
○ Yes to Bocce ball (multiple locations)
○ Request for dog-oriented amenities, limited support for proposed sites ○ Maintain natural environs on undeveloped parks
○ Neighbors support park creation at summit of Oak Knoll Drive Continuing Community Input Opportunities
○ Online Comments and Feedback
PROS Plan: Open Space Assessment and Recommendations
PROS Plan: Implementation
○ Prioritization
○ Action Plan
e

NEXT STEPS
31 Comment and
provide feedback at
BelmontPROSplan.com
[email protected]
All Park-Specific Recommendations available on PROS Plan website.

Upcoming Meetings
○ Focus Groups (May)
○ Council of Cities Presentation May 27 at 6 pm
○ June Commission Meeting; Focus on Parks (not Open Space) data, priorities ○ July and August Commission Meetings Combined (third week in July) Previous Meetings:
○
○ April 6, Planning Commission
○ March 29, Belmont Rotary Presentation
○ March 9, Belmont City Council Meeting
○ March 3, PROS Advisory Meeting
○ March 2, BRSSD Superintendent Meeting
○ Feb 3, Park and Rec Commission Meeting
■ Survey live for 4 weeks (end April 30th) another constant contact the week before PROS Groups - Wednesday May 19th 9-10:45am June Commission and Focus Groups findings update/progress, next AC Meeting

DRAFT RECOMMENDATION FEEDBACK
32 DRAFT Community Outreach
1017

APPENDIX I
526 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
THANK YOU!
33 BelmontPROSplan.com
[email protected]
34 APPENDIX I DRAFT
1018

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 527

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
City Council
March 22, 2022

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
1 PROS Plan purpose:

Set the framework for decision makers in the planning,
maintenance, development, and/or rehabilitation of Belmont’s Parks and open space system for a 15 year horizon.

Purpose To update City Council on PROS Plan progress and the Open Space Management Plan Efforts to Date
Big Ideas + Goals
An Engaged Community
Park Recommendations + Prioritization
Open Space Management Plan
Schedule + Next Steps
AGENDA
2 Push out 1 month
BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
3 EFFORTS TO DATE
4 ● Existing Conditions Assessments
● Community Engagement
● Benchmarking + Trends
● Park Typologies
● Park-specific Recommendations
○ Park-specific Focus Groups: Hidden Canyon 10/18, Ralston Ranch 10/20 ○ In-depth review at January, February, and March 2022 Parks & Recreation Commission ● Goals and Strategies
● Open Space Management Plan
● Recommendation Prioritization Criteria
● Continuing Community Engagement
DRAFT Community Outreach
1019

APPENDIX I
528 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
BIG IDEAS + GOALS
5 Prioritize
Environmental
+ Financial
Sustainability
Celebrate
the Outdoors
Outdoor
Recreation
for All
The City
as Your
Backyard
12 Goals
BIG IDEAS + GOALS
6 The City
as Your
Backyard
Goal 1. Support a connected Belmont by encouraging a robust pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit network unifying PROS sites across the City.

Goal 2. Foster a healthy community through spaces, amenities, programs, and public art to encourage physical activity, social interaction, and highlight Belmont’s culture and history.

Goal 3. Expand and enhance the existing PROS system to meet evolving community needs by establishing new uses, improved spaces, and recreation amenities that highlight the natural environment.

BIG IDEAS + GOALS
7 Outdoor
Recreation
for All
Goal 4. Leverage assets of the PROS system to support community health providing diverse, equitable, and inclusive spaces and amenities with accessible routes.

Goal 5. Revitalize the PROS system to be adaptable, flexible, and supportive of many uses and users now and into the future.

Goal 6. Partner with a variety of agencies, departments, volunteer groups, other entities, and the community to actualize PROS Plan goals and policies.

BIG IDEAS + GOALS
8 Celebrate
the Outdoors
Goal 7. Develop and implement an Open Space Management Plan.

Goal 8. Expand educational opportunities in parks and open spaces to highlight the local ecosystems.

Goal 9. Continue to enrich Belmont’s outdoor recreation opportunities with trail improvements, volunteer collaborations, and wayfinding features.

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1020

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 529

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
BIG IDEAS + GOALS
9 Prioritize
Environmental
+ Financial
Sustainability
Goal 10. Nurture the ecological strength of the City’s natural resources through resource-efficient landscapes and operations.

Goal 11. Provide high-quality, actively-managed, and well-maintained PROS assets supported by a range of funding sources.

Goal 12. Prioritize sustainable, resilient, and responsible management and maintenance practices, improvements, and projects at PROS sites.

AN ENGAGED COMMUNITY
10 Community Survey
Pop-up participation at City events
PROS Advisory Committee
3 meetings
in 2021
* Next Meeting:

April 5th
(Open Space) Parks and Recreation Commission
Updates at every
P&R Commission
meeting
Recommendations
reviewed in depth at
Jan/Feb/March 2022
* April 24th
Celebrate the Music
Concerts in the Park, Movie
Night in the Park, etc.

Focus Groups
11 in 2021
Emails + Comments
Over 730(2020 to February 2022)
Emails to [email protected] and/or P&R
Commission, and Comments via project website
City Council presentations
3 in 2021 + 2022
* April 16th
Egg Hunt

PARK TYPOLOGIES
11 Neighborhood Tier 1: Wakefield Park
Neighborhood Tier 2: Davey Glen Park
Community: Twin Pines Park

CITY-WIDE PARK ACCESS
12 Pedestrian and Bike Access Radii
¼ mile Neighborhood Park Tier 1
½ mile Neighborhood Park Tier 2
½ mile JUA School Site
½ mile Trailhead
Entire City Community Park
● Interconnected Park
System
○ Amenities
distributed across
the system
● Prioritize pedestrian
and bicycle access to
green spaces
○ Identify areas with
low access
○ Promote ped and
bike infrastructure
to reduce areas
with low access
○ Investigate new
park opportunity
sites in areas with
low access
DRAFT Community Outreach
1021

APPENDIX I
530 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: ALEXANDER

UPGRADED/NEW AMENITY
13 4. Tennis +
Pickleball

6. Bocce Ball +
Horseshoes

1. Looped
Walking Path(s)

5. BBQs : 8. Trees: Plantings : Planting : Shade

3. Celebrate the
Park Entrance 2. ADA Accessible

7. All-Abilities
Playground
Community Feedback: Positive support for recommendations DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: HIDDEN CANYON

UNDEVELOPED PARK

4. Open Space
Gateway
e. Outdoor
Classroom
b. Seating
Opportunities

1. ADA Parking : 2. Parking : Accessible : Seating : Planting : Shade d. Picnic Area
c. Nature Play
Element

3. Restroom
14 Community Feedback: Nature-oriented, phase improvements DRAFT OPPORTUNITY: OAK KNOLL

NEW PARK OPPORTUNITY
b. Benches c. Play Element
Accessible : Planting
15 Community Feedback: Strong neighborhood support for new park “Safety Circle”
Signage
PUBLIC RESPONSE: RECOMMENDATIONS
16 PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM OCTOBER 2021 to MARCH 2022
○ Support for Pump Track (Bike Park) at Belmont Sports Complex ○ Strong support by neighbors for park creation at summit of Oak Knoll Drive ○ Water-conscious native plants and trees in parks
○ Positive response to proposed park at Alameda de las Pulgas (Opportunity Site) ○ Seating, Nature Play, and Restroom for Hidden Canyon Park ○ Request for more Youth- and Teen-oriented spaces
○ Splash park (water play) at O’Donnell not encouraged, game tables preferred ○ Support for Bocce ball (multiple locations)
○ Request for dog-oriented amenities, but opposition to proposed sites ○ Maintain natural environs in undeveloped parks
○ Phased improvements at undeveloped sites (Hidden Canyon Park and Ralston Ranch Park) ○ Increase signage and art to celebrate parks
○ Support for redevelopment of Community Center at Barrett ○ Support for active transportation (bike/walk) as a priority ○ Some opposition to new uses/amenities in existing parks

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1022

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 531

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS

PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA
17 To sort recommendations into short, medium or long term projects Community Support (High, Low, N/A)
Existing Condition (Unsafe, Poor, Fair, N/A or New)
Project Complexity (High, Low)
Estimated Cost (High, Low)
Further a Goal (point per goal)
Funding Opportunities (Grant Potential, General Fund, Partner) Users Serves (Youth, Teen, Adult, Senior)
To Meet Underserved (Need, Area, Demographic)
Reduce Operation and Maintenance (High, Low)
Sustainability Improvements (High, Low)

OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Status Update and Next Steps
18 Plan process includes 8 tasks:

1. Project startup and orientation

2. Review of existing information

3. Develop goals and policies

4. Describe existing environmental conditions

5. Describe current and potential future recreational activities

6. Develop Management Alternatives and recommendations

7. Prepare Open Space Management Plan

8. Meetings for public input and Plan adoption
19 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Ongoing task status:

1. Task 3: Goals and Policies

2. Task 4: Describe existing environmental
conditions

3. Task 5: Describe current and potential
recreational activities
20 Next Steps:

1. Draft report on environmental
conditions, March 2022

2. Draft Two Management Alternatives,
April 2022

3. Draft Open Space Management Plan,
April 2022

4. City Council adoption of Open Space
Management Plan, July 2022

OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
DRAFT Community Outreach
1023

APPENDIX I
532 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Push out 1 month
21 ● Continuing Community
Input Opportunities
○ April 16: Egg Hunt
○ April 24: Celebrate
the Music
○ Email to
[email protected]
○ Parks & Recreation
Commission
● PROS Plan: Open Space
Assessment
○ April 5: PROS
Advisory Committee
meeting
● PROS Plan:

Implementation
○ Prioritization
○ Action Plan

SCHEDULE
THANK YOU!
22 APPENDIX I DRAFT
1024

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 533

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
3 City Council
July 12, 2022

PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE

MASTER PLAN
1 PROS Plan purpose:

Set the framework for decision makers in the planning,
maintenance, development, and/or rehabilitation of Belmont’s Parks and open space system for a 15 year horizon.

Purpose To review and adopt the PROS Plan
PROS Plan
● Process
● Vision
● Recommendations
● Open Space Management Plan
● Implementation Strategy
● Parks & Recreation Commission Recommendation
AGENDA
2 Process: GUIDING PRINCIPLES

1. Provide equitable access to resources and activities across the entire city

2. Promote inclusion to people of all backgrounds, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic position, or physical/cognitive ability

3. Make all users feel welcome and safe

4. Offer services and activities across a range of interests, abilities, and ages

5. Reflect our commitment to environmental resilience and sustainability

6. Respect the beauty and importance of our natural resources

7. Advance community health and well-being

8. Foster a sense of community and encourage social interaction

9. Provide well maintained and actively managed facilities

10. Adapt to changing conditions and needs

11. Utilize transparent community process to inform decisions 4 DRAFT Community Outreach
1025

APPENDIX I
534 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Process: AN ENGAGED COMMUNITY
7 How the COMMUNITY informed and influenced the PROS Plan (a sample)

1. Open Space Management Plan
a. WRA Environmental Consultants
b. PROS Plan schedule extended

2. Proposed uses at undeveloped parks
a. Hidden Canyon Park + Ralston Ranch Park

3. Opportunity Site: Oak Knoll Drive

4. Additional Advisory Committee meeting
5 Process: SCHEDULE Process: AN ENGAGED COMMUNITY
6 Community Survey
PROS Advisory Committee
5 meetings in 2021 + 2022
Focus Groups
11 in 2021 Emails + Comments
Over 1,500(2020 to June 2022)
Emails to [email protected] and/or P&R
Commission, and Comments via project website
City Council presentations
4 in 2021 + 2022
Pop-up participation
at City events
Concerts in the Park
Movie Night in the Park
Egg Hunt
Celebrate the Music
etc.

Open Space
Open House
Parks and Recreation Commission
Updates at every P&R Commission meeting
19 meetings in 2020 + 2021 + 2022
Project
Website
3,800+
unique visitors
8 PROS PLAN VISION
Re-imagine the Belmont Parks, Recreation, and Open
Space (PROS)system to create the City’s Backyard that
fosters inclusive, experiential, and nurturing public
spaces by setting the framework for decision makers in the planning, maintenance, development, and/or rehabilitation, implementable over a 15 year horizon.

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1026

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 535

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
The Ideas: BIG IDEAS + GOALS
11 The City
as Your
Backyard
Goal 1. Support a connected Belmont by encouraging a robust pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit network unifying PROS sites across the City.

Goal 2. Foster a healthy community through spaces, amenities, programs, and public art to encourage physical activity, social interaction, and highlight Belmont’s culture and history.

Goal 3. Expand and enhance the existing PROS system to meet evolving community needs by establishing new uses, improved spaces, and recreation amenities that highlight the natural environment.

Vision: COMMUNITY THEMES
9 Amenities for Social
+ Physical Activity
More Seating
Opportunities
Physical
Connections
Amenities for
Diverse Interests
Accessible for
All Abilities
Create More
with Less
Connecting
with Nature
Available for Many
Uses + Users
Natural
Resources
Honor Belmont’s
Unique Landscape
Vision: BIG IDEAS + GOALS
10 Prioritize
Environmental
+ Financial
Sustainability
Celebrate
the Outdoors
Outdoor
Recreation
for All
The City
as Your
Backyard
Vision: BIG IDEAS + GOALS
12 Outdoor
Recreation
for All
Goal 4. Leverage assets of the PROS system to support community health providing diverse, equitable, and inclusive spaces and amenities with accessible routes.

Goal 5. Revitalize the PROS system to be adaptable, flexible, and supportive of many uses and users now and into the future.

Goal 6. Partner with a variety of agencies, departments, volunteer groups, other entities, and the community to actualize PROS Plan goals and policies.

DRAFT Community Outreach
1027

APPENDIX I
536 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Vision: CITY-WIDE PARK ACCESS
15 Access Radii
¼ mile Neighborhood Park Tier 1
¼ mile Undeveloped Park
½ mile Neighborhood Park Tier 2
Entire City Community Park
● Interconnected Park
System
○ Amenities
distributed across
the system
● Prioritize pedestrian
and bicycle access to
green spaces
○ Identify areas with
low access
○ Promote ped and
bike infrastructure
to reduce areas
with low access
○ Investigate new
park opportunity
sites in areas with
low access
Vision: BIG IDEAS + GOALS
13 Celebrate
the Outdoors
Goal 7. Develop and implement an Open Space Management Plan.

Goal 8. Expand educational opportunities in parks and open spaces to highlight the local ecosystems.

Goal 9. Continue to enrich Belmont’s outdoor recreation opportunities with trail improvements, volunteer collaborations, and wayfinding features.

Vision: BIG IDEAS + GOALS
14 Prioritize
Environmental
+ Financial
Sustainability
Goal 10. Nurture the ecological strength of the City’s natural resources through resource-efficient landscapes and operations.

Goal 11. Provide high-quality, actively-managed, and well-maintained PROS assets supported by a range of funding sources.

Goal 12. Prioritize sustainable, resilient, and responsible management and maintenance practices, improvements, and projects at PROS sites.

VISION TO IMPLEMENTATION
16 APPENDIX I DRAFT
1028

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 537

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS SPECTRUM
19 Recommendations: SYSTEM-WIDE STRATEGIES
17 ● Broad recommendations to impact the entire PROS system ● Organized under the Big Ideas and Goals
● Furthered by:
○ Strategic actions
○ Park-specific recommendations
○ Open Space Management Plan
74 Strategies
Social Gathering
Space
Recommendations: STRATEGIC ACTIONS
18 Inclusive +
All-Abilities Play
PROS Activation
Plan
“Pop-up” Park
Installations
Usage Study
Social Gathering
Space
Recommendations: NEW PARK OPPORTUNITY

OAK KNOLL DRIVE
b. Benches c. Play Element
Accessible : Planting
20 Community Feedback: Identified as an Opportunity Site via neighbor’s input, strong community support for new park “Safety Circle”
Signage
DRAFT Community Outreach
1029

APPENDIX I
538 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS

OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Open Space Management Plan identifies objectives, policies, and implementation actions for:

1. Environmental sustainability

2. Balanced recreation use

3. Natural hazard mitigation

4. Vegetation protection

5. Wildlife protection

6. Water resources

7. Science based management

8. Expanded implementation resources
23 Recommendations: UNDEVELOPED PARK

HIDDEN CANYON PARK

4. Open Space
Gateway
e. Outdoor
Classroom
b. Seating
Opportunities

1. ADA Parking : 2. Parking : Accessible : Seating : Planting : Shade d. Picnic Area
c. Nature Play
Element

3. Restroom
21 Community Feedback: Community revised Option A
Nature-oriented, phase improvements per community request 22 Recommendations: EXISTING PARK MASTER PLAN

TWIN PINES PARK

OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
24 APPENDIX I DRAFT
1030

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 539

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Key Findings from Environmental Assessment, Recreation Use Assessment

1. Over 90 percent of the open space lands consist of native biological communities.

2. 11 special-status plant species and 7 special-status wildlife species have moderate/high potential to occur or are present.

3. Non-native species generally limited.

4. Trails represent about 1.3 percent of open space lands.

5. Approximately 50 stream crossings identified.

6. Less than 10% of trail erosion ratings were considered “high.”

7. Rates of participation in nature-based recreation are increasing. 27 FINDINGS

1. Environmental Assessment

2. Recreational Use Assessment

3. Objectives, policies, implementation actions
25 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Plan consists of: Methods included:
● Desktop research
● Site visits
● Community and stakeholder input
26 OSMP PROCESS
Key Findings Wildfire Hazard Assessment
Steep topography, weather, and the potential to
damage human life and structures
● Very high wildfire hazards for WDL
● High wildfire hazards for SJC
28 FINDINGS
DRAFT Community Outreach
1031

APPENDIX I
540 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
OSMP
Comprehensive set of objectives, policies and
implementation actions designed to:
● Protect sensitive resources
● Guide trail management and manage
recreation
● Mitigate the risk of natural hazards
31 COMBINE BASE PLAN + ALTERNATIVES
+Recreation Emphasis Alternative
Additional policy and implementation actions
related trails and recreational use
+Habitat Emphasis Alternative
Additional policies and implementation actions
related to vegetation restoration and wildlife
protection
Key Takeaways

1. Overall habitat quality is high.

2. Existing nature-based recreational uses can continue on existing mapped and established, previously unmapped trails.

3. Continue wildfire fuel reduction efforts.
29 FINDINGS
30 OPEN SPACE THEMES
Objectives
Policies
Implementation
Actions
Natural
Hazard
Mitigation
Environmental
Sustainability
Objectives
Policies
Implementation
Actions
Balanced
Recreation
Use
Objectives
Policies
Implementation
Actions

COMMUNITY PREFERENCE
32 Advisory Committee #5 (5/31/22).

Poll question: Which Management Alternatives do you support? 35 responses (8 AC members + 27 participants)
Management Alternatives % of Vote
Base Plan (alone) 6%
Base Plan + Recreation Emphasis 37%
Base Plan + Habitat Emphasis 17%
Base Plan + Recreation Emphasis + Habitat Emphasis 40%

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1032

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 541

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Implementation Action Ratings
35 IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS
Easy Medium Hard
These actions can be
performed immediately under
existing City programs, funding,
or with minimal additional
effort.

These actions require additional
planning, equipment, staffing,
funding – either internal or
external, or other operational
changes.

These actions may require
substantial planning,
interagency coordination,
staffing, funding, or other
operational changes.
33 IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS
Recommendations based on:
● PROS Plan Big Ideas + Goals,
● Findings from WRA assessments,
● Public feedback
● Clear next steps for the City
Recommendation to merge the Base Plan with both management alternatives

IMPLEMENTATION ACTIONS
34 An implementation action is a discrete, measurable action that achieves a desired outcome.

Environmental
Sustainability
Ex. Improve
stream crossings
Balanced
Recreation
Use
Ex. Monitor
visitor use levels
Natural Hazard
Mitigation
Ex. Using grazing
reduce wildfire
fuels
● Improve stream crossings (Hard)
● Fuels reduction plan (Medium)
● Monitor recreation use (Hard)
● Seasonal/weather dependent restrictions
on maintenance (Easy)
36 PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS
DRAFT Community Outreach
1033

APPENDIX I
542 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS

PRIORITIZATION MATRIX
● To further PROS Plan goals
○ 12 goals
● To respond to community priority
○ N/A, Medium, High
● To serve an existing deficiency
○ Demographic group, Underserved area of
Belmont, Anticipated Areas of Increased
Residential Density, New use, Availability of
amenity/use, Resolve access issues
● To address an existing condition
○ N/A, Good, Fair, Poor, Critical or unsafe
39 37

FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS
● Develop recreation and volunteer restoration programs ● Examine portfolio of solutions for multi-use trail
experiences

IMPLEMENTATION
38 ● PRIORITIZATION MATRIX
To prioritize park-specific recommendations
● FUNDING STRATEGIES + PARTNERSHIPS
Portfolio of funding for capital improvements, maintenance, and operations ● ACTION PLAN
for short term, long term, or ongoing
The Document: PROS PLAN
40 APPENDIX I DRAFT
1034

APPENDIX I
DRAFT | Final February 2024 CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 543

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS

CITY COUNCIL
Q + A
43 PR COMM RECOMMENDATION
The Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan (PROS Plan) was recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission on July 6, 2022 to the City Council for approval with the following amendments.

1. Consolidate the Open Space Management Plan’s Base Plan and Management Alternatives objectives, policies, and implementation actions into a single plan.

2. Clearly present priority recommendations in the Open Space Management Plan by theme - environmental sustainability, balanced recreation uses and trail management, and natural hazard mitigation.

3. Pursue the creation of dedicated parkland in downtown Belmont and the Belmont Village Specific Plan area in response to potential residential density increase in the area due to anticipated housing unit development as outlined in the 2023-2031 Housing Element update.

4. Apply consistent terminology to remove ambiguity.

5. Refine specific graphics for clarity.
41 THANK YOU!
42 www.BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
PUBLIC

COMMENTS
44 DRAFT Community Outreach
1035

APPENDIX I
544 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES DRAFT | Final February 2024

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS

CITY COUNCIL

COMMENTS
45 Push out 1
BelmontPROSplan.com [email protected]
46 APPENDIX I DRAFT
1036
Community Outreach
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 509

DRAFT PARK-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION COMMENTS

PARK COMMENT COMMENTER
Belmont
Sports
Complex
"I would like to write in support of adding a a Pump
Track (Bike Park). This is very much needed in the community, especially since the track in Foster City at Shorebird is no longer accessible and may never be coming back. Please make sure this is accessible for all ages and skill levels. Also, the beauty of the track at Foster City is that the track was made of dirt, so it was more forgiving than something made of concrete. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments."
Kristie Eglsaer
9/30/21
Opportunity
- Alameda
De Las
Pulgas
Adding benches here would be great, there are some great views from this location! We should also look to define the sidewalk here as it can be a major pedestrian thoroughfare. Also, if Play Elements are added we should ensure that a fence or similar is used due to the traffic on Alameda.

Jack Gaynor
10/3/21
Hidden
Canyon
Park
"Great to see recommendations for more amenities at Hidden Canyon, the benches and toilet facilities will be greatly appreciated by all users. Given the parks outdoor use, I would suggest adding drinking water facilities (for both people and pets). Additionally, there are a large number of recreational bike users that visit Hidden Canyon; adding a bike repair stand with tools would assist them. The site would also be a perfect location for a bike skills area or pump track given the flat location and proximity to the Waterdog trails to allow children and beginners to learn.

Regarding the proposals both seem great, I personally think the dog park would see more use given the current trail users I see."
Jack Gaynor
10/3/21
Belmont
Sports
Complex
The proposal to build a pump track is great! This would be a great resource for kids and beginner cyclists to build their skills in a safe environment. The Can we look at locating the pump track near other areas of heavy cyclist use such as Waterdog open space? Jack Gaynor
10/4/21
Alexander
Park
"My name is Ryen Motzek, I grew up in Belmont and own a skate shop in San Mateo, where we sell lots of skateboards to Belmont residents. Belmont is where I started skating myself.

I strongly suggest building a skatepark in this location. It can be a small, plaza like space that blends with normal architecture/landscape, such as https://www.dezeen.com/awards/2020/longlists/bornskateplaza/ Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions." Ryen Motzek
10/7/21
Barrett
Community
Center
I encourage belmont to consider putting forth more of an effort on providing the youth of this city places to congregate and enjoy themselves, something Belmont has Always gone against. I’m just gunna say straight Belmont city council seriously needs to take into review what actions they take to support our youth because currently they are very slim.

Nicholas Hutter
10/7/21
Belmont
Sports
Complex
"Dear PROS Committee,
My family is excited to see the possibility of a pump track at one of Belmont’s parks. My kids (5 & 8) and I have enjoyed riding bikes together on multiple occasions at a pump track in South Lake Tahoe, and are thrilled that we might have a new, safe place for kids to ride bicycles near our home." Chris March
10/7/21
Hallmark
Park
Please consider area 2 in the park map to be used as a dog park. It is critically needed, and most of us using it is for that purpose now.

Bill Kurtz
10/9/21
O'Donnell
Park
I walk in the park daily and I see people using the basketball courts frequently. I'm not sure why you'd want to eliminate one although there is another one at the other end of the park so they would still have a place to play. I object to replacing this area with a water play area. We are in a drought and with global warming I can't see this as the best use of our limited water resources. How about a bocce ball court? To the best of my limited knowledge there isn't one in Belmont. Also it would be nice to see something slated primarily for adult usage.

Susan Kotta-Wait
10/10/21
Hallmark
Park
"I really like the idea of a Bocce Court at Hallmark Park! I hope it happens! It's a very effective use of space (typically, 2 to 4 players play at once)...

Thanks, all, for the hard work!
LKG"
Laurent Gharda
10/12/21
O'Donnell
Park
I like the idea of making the picnic areas eligible for reservations, however, I would also suggest that those costs remain affordable/low since this park is truly a neighborhood park and doesn't offer the same amenities as others like Twin Pines. The BBQ's need an upgrade as well so I appreciate that being captured but consider also updating the picnic tables, especially if rental fees are being imposed. Instead of a water play space at the front of the park, I'd suggest something more low maintenance and sustainable that still adds another element of play to the facility (i.e. built in concrete games like cornhole, bocce ball, ping pong, ladderball, mini golf, etc.) with a nice seating area. More running water during times of drought (with no end in sight) may not be the wisest investment for the City. Better yet, I'd love to see Bankshot Basketball considered as it's an inclusive amenity for people of all abilities.

Noreen LEek
10/12/21
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Community Outreach
1037

APPENDIX D
510 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES

DRAFT PARK-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION COMMENTS

PARK COMMENT COMMENTER
Alexander
Park
Yes, yes, yes to an updated play structure, pickleball lines, and bocce here! Noreen Leek 10/12/21
Barrett
Community
Center
AMEN to a pool in Belmont at Barrett! 100% support!!!! Noreen Leek 10/12/21
Opportunity
- Ralston
Ave & Old
County Rd.

I'm not convinced that a skate park directly adjacent to the train station in this location, is the best idea. In all of Belmont, we see the most homeless/panhandlers in this intersection and I wouldn't feel comfortable allowing my kids to hang out there. I'd prefer to see that space used for something with a greater community benefit.

Noreen Leek
10/12/21
Belmont
Sports
Complex
"I'm happy to see the Bike Pump Track slated for the Belmont Sports Complex. It makes so much more sense than other possible locations (access, parking, facilities, safety, etc.) Thank you for having listened to the Belmont residents' (including my) concerns during the Parks & Rec Commission Meeting – Feb 5, 2020 re: Bike Pump Track in the Belmont City Council Chambers.

The plan is shaping up nicely, including Bocce court at Hallmark Park!" Laurent Gharda
10/14/21
Belmont
Sports
Complex
"Glad to see the Bike Pump Track is slated for BSC where it belongs; not in Waterdog Open Space! Thank You!"
Jennifer Lien
10/14/21
Barrett
Community
Center
I heard there have been complaints about residents using the Barrett for their dogs after dog hours have ended. I’m assuming this applies to the morning session as the evening session only last a couple of months during the year, surely not enough time worth complaining about considering how many households in Belmont have dogs. How many houses border Barrett (the complainers) vs how many residents use the dog park? I think that’s a very important point to consider—the majority should be more important, meaning dog park users. It would be so easy to stop people from using the park after dog park hours have ended: put a lock on the gate overnight and put up a security camera to monitor daytime use. Belmont PD have the manpower to handle the gate locking and unlocking—they patrol Barrett regularly as it is. They also have the manpower to monitor a security camera that would show daytime abusers. Look to how San Carlos handles their City Hall Dog Park as an example.

Belmont absolutely needs two spaces for dogs. Cipriani is located in a whole different world from Barrett. Residents in Central Belmont have to drive to get there, adding to the traffic problems we’re already facing. Belmont should also have a hiking area for off-leash dogs, just one trail or section of a park would work. Look to Pulgas Ridge Preserve for an example of how to handle an off-leash space within a park. There are so many things geared towards children in Belmont but what about all the dogs? I don’t have children but my taxes go towards them and not dogs. Residents complain about dog poop on the streets and illegal off-leash dogs at Water Dog Lake…this happens because Belmont hasn’t allocated enough outlets for off-leash dog walking. With so many households having dogs in Belmont, the City needs to allocate more, not less, space for dogs. Please work with other cities to see how they handle their space allocation for dogs. Please make Belmont friendly for everyone, not just children. Thank you.

Katarina Koster
10/15/21
Hidden
Canyon
Park
We would like to get some benches and tables at this park. But we prefer not to have a dog park or pump track. City has not been maintaining it too well.

Keyuri Shah
10/17/21
Ralston
Ranch Park
Dear Belmont Parks and Recreation,
Thank you for soliciting feedback on the Open Space Master Plan. We attended an earlier feedback session that was focused on a pump park at Water Dog Lake – these thoughts are specific to Ralston Ranch Park. Or as we lovingly call it after 24-years of living next to it, the Ralston Ranch Woods.

1. We would like to see all or a much larger % of the park left natural (A) - ideally, all of it. Open space is what makes Belmont special and we are sad to see building being permitted in areas that had previously been restricted and the continued loss of wildlife habitat. Ralston Ranch Woods is home to owls, hawks, rabbits, deer and occasional fox, bobcats and mountain lions. We watch deer moving between the canyon on one side of RR to the other everyday (and our Ring cam is full of curious deer families grazing on our front lawn). So much of their open space is already encroached, it’s really a shame to develop RR Woods – be it chopping down existing trees, or building sidewalks, fences and other structures. That said, we do understand that we’re not the only stakeholders in this decision. So, we could support (B) and (C).

2. A play structure for small children (C) would be nice if positioned away from houses - and we already have a few benches (B) so that’s not much of a change and would be a welcome addition for families who live and walk in the neighborhood.

Wendy Miller
10/19/21
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX D DRAFT
1038
Community Outreach
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 511

DRAFT PARK-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION COMMENTS

PARK COMMENT COMMENTER
Ralston
Ranch Park
(con’t)

3. Everything else – a dog park that clears trees and puts up fences, picnic tables and young adult gathering area directly on the other side of existing homes sounds awful. (D,E,F) First, dog parks are usually made of dirt (do you know how windy it gets up here?), surrounded by a chain link fence (how unsightly as you enter RRR) – and adding more parked cars at the only exit point for RRR (where we already have daycare drop-off and pick-up) will only add further the congestion.

The clearing of trees also means more erosion. Most homes on the lower part of Ralston Ranch have sump pumps because of the water runoff in the winter that drains down the hill into their back yards – removing existing trees will only increase that problem.

Second, Belmont has a problem managing gathering areas – look at the cars/people at the Len Turner Memorial Vista Point (even after dark) who smoke, leave alcohol bottles and trash spilling over trash bins for the crow to throw around. It’s become a constant parking spot for Uber and Lift drivers, so the area needs more trash and recycling bins, more frequent servicing, and better monitoring by the police. Ditto for the car park areas at the trail head on Ralston Avenue and 92 intersections.

Third, people already drive to RRR and park along the street to access the trail heads for mountain biking. I’d prefer to see the city put in a water fountain, trash and recycling cans at the RRR turnaround and service it regularly for all the folks using the 16-miles of trails cut into Belmont’s open space. Hikers, dog walkers and mountain bikers.

Lastly, encouraging gathering of more people from outside the immediate neighborhood is simply inviting more crime. Robberies have increased in our area and the Belmont Police have acknowledged we are a quick getaway for criminals due to the easy access to 101 and 280.

Unintended consequences must be carefully considered – this would affect not only Ralston Ranch, but the Highlands and other neighborhoods around us.

If Homer and I had our druthers, we’d like to see the city expand (A) and just maintain the woods by trimming and clearing brush 2X year for fire safety, leaving all of the 70-plus trees alone. It would keep the space open for wildlife habitat and continue to be a place of solitude and quiet reflection for we humans. I’d like to see Belmont take better care of what we have (maintaining the trees, managing trash left by those already using our open spaces) and addressing issues at the vista point and car park areas.

To add to the conversation, how about planting and dedicating a grove of redwoods to those lost in the fires this year - with a natural labyrinth in the center? Some benches for quiet reflection or meditation would be delightful.

While we'd like to see the space kept natural, we could support B & C if tucked into a quiet space in the park – set away from homes.

Thank you for asking for our input!
Best Regards – Wendy Miller & Homer Wong
2 Ralston Ranch Road, Belmont"
Wendy Miller (con’t)
10/19/21
Ralston
Ranch Park
I’d like to attend the meeting Carol Rossi
10/19/21
Hidden
Canyon
Park
Thank you for hosting the session yesterday about the Hidden Canyon Park. I was there but didn't speak during during the meeting. I also live on Carlmont in the "pink" houses but not very close to the park. I, like many people there, would love to see the natural wildlife / open space feel maintained, with some improvements but nothing too invasive/disruptive. I don't think a dog park is a good idea for that reason, as well as others (issues with dogs off-leash, e.g.). I also would like to echo the statement made by several people that before we add more things, or in parallel, it would be good to improve the maintenance of what we do have. The park has typically been overgrown in the summer and muddy in the winter (ok, not so much lately, but we can hope). If we want to improve it for people's enjoyment, fixing those issues would be a good start. I like community gardens but I don't think this is the space for that either -- either it'd have to be seriously fenced and seriously watered (not advisable), or it'd die and/or get eaten by all the animals. Thank you for the good discussions! Lara Crawford
10/19/21
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Community Outreach
1039

APPENDIX D
512 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES

DRAFT PARK-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION COMMENTS

PARK COMMENT COMMENTER
Ralston
Ranch Park
Parks and Recreation:

My general comments regarding the current Park proposal for Ralston Ranch Park.

Firstly, I am unsure as to why the park limits are not extended all the way to the edge of sidewalks on Ralston Ave. It would make sense that this portion be included so that P&R can be responsible for maintaining and up keeping the entire area. It does not make sense to exclude this area as it provides another natural location to plant mitigation, replacement and screening trees for the community.

Screening trees are important as they provide mitigation from wind, visual intrusion, natural screens for wildlife to pass through the community, and on occasion an obstruction for wayward vehicles that come off Ralston Ave. Yes, this has happened and more than once; and the last one made it pretty far down the hill.

As for the elements of your plan:

DOG PARK
I am not sure that this location is the best and most appropriate location for a dog park.

Typically dog parks service wider community areas. Cipriani is the much better dog park for the overall community and services much of the local community in our area. Regardless, the proximity of Cipriani would limit the usage of this specific dog park to a smaller, defined part of the community and more than likely nearby San Mateo residents.

Residents of both of the Belmont communities should be the focus of this park and they both have established trailheads into the great open park areas adjacent to these communities. We have numerous dog owners in the community, including myself, and I personally prefer to walk my dogs through the trail system so that both the dogs and myself get exercise. So as a dog owner adjacent to this park, I would probably rarely use it. I am sure that will be true for most of the RRR community.

This type of park also does not have great parking and access. The roadway set up with one exit probably is not great for any more added traffic. Every person parking to access the park would have to work as a single trip in each direction for each visit. There are already bikers and hikers that use the trailhead at the cul de sac that park along the street, and most of these users also go out illegally through the Christian exit. This is just another traffic safety risk, especially at that intersection.

As I see it, most of this community would not necessarily use the dog park. However, most of the park is being captured as a dog park. As stated I am not sure that is the best usage of the space in the park for the neighborhood and the community.

If having a dog park to service this part of the community is important to P&R, I would suggest studying other location and more specifically a dog park at Fox Elementary School as an extension of your JUA. This would be much more ideal as it supports a wider section of this community, including the Hallmark neighborhood. It allows for better usage of the park spaces and a more functional dog park, with much better access and parking.

GATHERING/PICNIC AREAS
Gathering areas are fine as long as they are well maintained and policed. We already have local experience with the attractive nuisance at the lookout with the drinking, smoking and sexual activity only 500’ away. As a result, there is much apprehension from providing just another location for bad behavior to occur even closer to our homes.

Regardless of this, the plan placing these gathering spaces, picnic areas and such directly adjacent to the homes is not good planning. These should be located farther away to preserve and protect the privacy of this home owners. This is another consequence of having most of the functional space being used for a dog park. If you remove the dog park, the other tier 2 amenities can be better situated farther from the homes, including any play structures, gathering areas, picnic areas, garbage receptacles, etc. It would also create one specific space that is more open, and that is easier to access, use, maintain, and police.

This still does not mitigate the parking and traffic related issues. The goal should be to make this park be a destination primarily for the local communities surrounding it and not to draw in people from outside the community neighborhoods, especially those that have to specifically access it by car. Better for the community and better for the environment. We appreciate this upcoming forum to discuss the park as I think getting a better understanding of what the actual local affected Roy Schnabel
10/20/21
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX D DRAFT
1040
Community Outreach
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 513

DRAFT PARK-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION COMMENTS

PARK COMMENT COMMENTER
Ralston
Ranch Park
(con’t)
communities want from this park is beneficial and good planning.

Ultimately, I think that maintaining or preserving as much of the park as open space is probably a more ideal use of this park space. Your current online survey also seems to bear this out as only a very small percentage view the current space as unsatisfactory. If you eliminate those with no opinion than 85-90% of the respondents feel that the park in its current condition is excellent or satisfactory with over 60% of that in the excellent column.

I would also recommend that any additional, replacement or mitigation trees be planted along the perimeters of the park especially at Ralston Ave and adjacent to those homes closest to the park to continue to provide both natural visual, privacy and wind barriers.

Regards,
Roy and Maria Schnabel
97 Ralston Ranch Road
Belmont CA 94002"
Roy Schnabel
(con’t)
10/20/21
Hidden
Canyon
Park
I love biking at this park. Please keep it free and open for everyone to use. The best is after we stop at waterdog cafe or some other pub downtown and and have some wonderful food and drinks! Ralph Grundler
10/25/21
Other Keep Mountain Biking alive in Waterdog! This place is amazing and has allowed so many bay area citizens to connect with nature in a suburban landscape unlike any other.

Brent Ziegler
10/25/21
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.

Hi we live on hillman and have a toddler who started to walk recently. Together with many other similar aged kid, we don’t have a safe / toddler friendly playground within walking distance. The plan to build a playground area near oak knoll dr will largely benefit us and many similar familiars in this neighborhood, and I’m looking forward to hearing back from Belmont city! Xuening Liu
10/30/21
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.
"This area is in so much need of a park! There is no single play structure in a mile+ radius. That is, in the area with no sidewalks (or, worse: patchy and parked).

It's not only exhausting, but also plain dangerous to walk a toddler/stroller ~3 miles round-trips to College View / Davey Glen.

There are many families with small kids in immediate proximity of the Oak Knoll that would benefit greatly from having a park here."
Volha Zhurauskaya
10/30/21
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.
"My wife and I and our two kids (ages 1 and 3) moved to 1904 Oak Knoll Dr in May of this year. One of our neighbors recently mentioned that there was a petition for adding a small playground at the top of Oak Knoll Dr. I would like to voice my support for this opportunity.

Many of our neighbors on Valley View Ave and Oak Knoll Dr also have young kids, so a playground here would be much used.

Currently, I've been alternating between Twin Pines and Beresford Park to reach a playground where my kids can play. The closest park to us seems to be Patricia Wharton Park. While beautiful and wellmaintained, it's rather small and suitable for only sitting. Having a park with a playground in walking distance for our neighborhood would be great!"
Jason Wang
10/31/21
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.

We live at Oak Knoll Drive and we have small kids, this can be a place to entertain and meet neighbors.

Heloisa Rodrigues
11/1/21
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.

As a resident of this area with 2 kids and knowing how many kids in the area will benefit greatly from this project, I am strongly in favor of it. I really hope it gets approved and built as soon as possible. A nice park like this is sorely needed here and will be very much appreciated.

Eduardo Rodrigues
11/1/21
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.

This is a critical need for the neighborhood. I love the idea of additional seating and a modest structure. Only consideration would be to ensure we maintain the tree coverage as much as possible.

Zack Rhoades
11/1/21
Hidden
Canyon
Park
I frequently walk in the Hidden Canyon / Waterdog area and the narrow trails especially are simply too narrow for the bikes to safely pass anyone. There really should be restrictions on what trails the bikers can go on and they should not be allowed at all on the narrow trails. There are too many of them and too many bad apples among them. Putting up signs doesn't do anything. The bikers ignore them. And given the proximity of Hallmark park, I'm not sure why the bikers can't just go there, and leave the wildlife (and pedestrians) in peace at Waterdog and Hidden Canyon. Ideally, bikers should be banned entirely from Waterdog and Hidden Canyon.

Michael McEvoy
11/2/21
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Community Outreach
1041

APPENDIX D
514 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES

DRAFT PARK-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION COMMENTS

PARK COMMENT COMMENTER
Barrett
Community
Center
Would really love the rebuild of Barrett Community Center to start breaking ground! S Lee 12/7/21
Barrett
Community
Center
There is already a master plan approved and Conceptual Design report from 2020 for Barrett Community Center. Can we focus on executing the master plan, instead of spending resources in discovering new parks? Barret Community Center is old and the area is in much need of a renovation for community to enjoy.

A L
12/7/21
Barrett
Community
Center
Please please please do whatever possible to accelerate the Barrett center improvements. These are long overdue and will have a huge impact community life in Belmont.

Nadav Benbarak
12/7/21
Barrett
Community
Center
There are no basketball courts with lighting in Belmont. For those with young children or demanding work schedules this leaves only the evenings for a basketball game. It would be great to have lighting put in for some of the courts to enable this type of use. I personally organize a weekly game and drive 20 minutes to the nearest available court with lighting.

Nadav Benbarak
12/8/21
Barrett
Community
Center
Please accelerate the building of the new community center! Paul Perry 12/14/21
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.

Adding a playground at the top of Oak Knoll Drive is a great idea. There are lots of little kids living in the area with no park within walking distance. We live on Oak Knoll and always have to drive to a park. The small area at the top of Oak Knoll Dr isn't being used for anything right now so this would be a fantastic use of that space!
Jessie Hsu
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.
"HI Belmont Planning Team, I'm so happy this made to public review. My family and I live on Hillman Ave would be ecstatic if there was a park within walking distance we could take our toddler son to! We've been trying to take a greener approach and not to use our car while in town, but it has been a challenge with going to parks. It would be great if there could be a small play structure for the kids in the neighborhood to play with, but even a patch of flat maintained area would be much appreciated! We'll be happy to volunteer some time to help build a park for all the neighborhood! Best.

The Tam's"
Gregory Tam
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.

My family and I sometimes walk up Oak Knoll Drive for short hike (as do many in the neighborhood), and the addition of a small park space there with seating area/bench will be a very welcome improvement to the community at the currently underused space.

Cheuk Chi Lo
Twin Pines
Park
I really like the idea of providing ADA accessibility to all amenities. I would also recommend cleaning the bathrooms in Twin Pines Park as they are very old and usually dirty, and I support the idea of replacing the drinking fountain. This might be a long shot, but I have noticed that in various campuses and businesses across the Bay Area metal table tennis tables have been built. I think this is an awesome idea that gives the community a really fun way to engage in physical exercise, and it also promotes table tennis as a sport around the community. I think this could be implemented in any park, and I know its a long shot but just a suggestion.

Taran Tummala
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.
"A park here would be highly desired due to none within 20-30 min walking distance and there's been a big inbound of young kids in the neighborhood. I see kids playing in the nearby streets frequently and a park would be a safer place to play.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION!!!
-Adriene Wong"
Adriene Wong
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.

My wife and I have a 2 year old with another one on the way and would like to support the mini park at the top of Oak Knoll. We live at 1806 Mezes and currently have to walk all the way down to Davey Glen to access a park (or drive). We walked a couple of times but the distance has made it pretty difficult. A mini-park on Oak Knoll would be great. We moved to Belmont in 2020 and have really enjoyed it. A park in our vicinity would make it an even better place to raise our kids! Ryan Hannink
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.

Great plan! Really looking forward to having a playground at the top of Oak Knoll! Robin Raffard DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX D DRAFT
1042
Community Outreach
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 515

DRAFT PARK-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION COMMENTS

PARK COMMENT COMMENTER
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.

I have lived on Oak Knoll Drive for 30 years and have always thought the circle center at the top of our street could be conveniently used as a basic, but attractive resting, sitting location for the many people who travel up and down our road. There are also a number of new families in the area with younger children that would make this convenience a real joy. The size of the location seems perfect for a bench, a park-style picnic table and maybe a small youth playground slide (for the toddlers) without overwhelming the space. Adding additional planting would provide a new level of attractiveness. It's a nice sized space that with a small upgrade could provide a really great little park for this area that's slightly under served in this regard. The vision would be to create both a functional and beautiful pinnacle (park) that travelers will ascend to atop the Oak Knoll Drive hill.

Jeff Murphy
Hidden
Canyon
Park
"Thank you for listening to our voices about preserving the natural beauty of Hidden Canyon and not over developing the area and encouraging even more traffic than we have today in our cul de sac.

The proposed plans look great. I like that you're adding more amenities to areas that can accomodate higher traffic.

Thank you for hearing our voices, acknowledging and incorporating our input into your proposed plans.

Jakki"
Jakki Geiger
Opportunity
- Oak Knoll
Dr.
"We are residents of Oak Knoll for over five years; our younger one was born in Belmont. We enthusiastically support this initiative! Oak Knoll and the neighboring area are coming alive with toddlers and children. Since our terrain doesn't allow for much front yard mingling, a small park like this would be a great place for our children to get to know each other and build a community.

Looking forward to this!"
Snigdha Sen
Hidden
Canyon
Park
"Hi I've been leaving in Hidden valley more than 10 years. I am (and family , including high school goes) very excited that city want to update the hidden canyon. Let's do it! :) During our dinner table conversation , kids came with the plan :) A jogging track ( does go hand & hand with bicycles ), few picnic tables , swings & gazebo for Thi Chi , meditation , Yoga or senior gathering.

About plan definitely enhances the open nature around us & supports inclusiveness / community thinking.

Thanks for all energy and efforts you all putting for us! Yogesh"
Yogesh kulkarni
Barrett
Community
Center
"Hi, I support the idea of spaces for teens to hang out. Indoor/outdoor pool and lighted basketball courts would be ideal.

Thanks. Davinder"
Davinder
Josephson
Fox
Elementary
School
(JUA)
Please do not convert Ralston and Fox to artificial turf. It is such a joy for kids to be able to play on grass, it is better for the environment, and there are health concerns with turf fields.

Sumitra Chari
Alexander
Park
As a member of the Sterling Downs Community, I would like to see updated plantings at Alexander Park with native plants to promote biodiversity and a healthier ecosystem.

Travis Bench Bench
1/27/22
Alexander
Park
"Please no trees in the middle of the open grassy field, as that would block uses of the grass such as soccer, frisbee games.

Looped path + bocce looks great!"
Doug Ricket
1/27/22
Alexander
Park
Looped walking path and bocce ball court sounds great! Please leave the large field open and do not add trees in the middle of the field. Adding trees elsewhere, like over along the side of the playground area, would be great.

Jennifer Hennings
1/28/22
Barrett
Community
Center
Outdoor pool sounds AMAZING!! Please keep the pool -- we don't have any good public swimming pool options in Belmont and that would be an incredible addition to our city. Splash pad area is also great.

Jennifer Hennings
1/28/22
Twin Pines
Park
The erosion behind the playground and the war memorial is not currently fenced off and kids could easily fall over the edge. Please add a fence to prevent kids from falling over the edge into the creek.

The rest of the plans look great, especially improving creek access (#11), adding the grassy field (#10) and the water play element (#6).

Jennifer Hennings
1/2//22
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Community Outreach
1043

APPENDIX D
516 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES

DRAFT PARK-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION COMMENTS

PARK COMMENT COMMENTER
Hidden
Canyon
Park
"I live on Carlmont Drive, but based on the meeting on 2/2/2022 I think this applies across many of the park proposals as described in the meeting. Many of the neighborhoods have stated concerns over parking and traffic, but there doesn't seem to be any means to survey or assess current traffic and impact of adding elements with significant draw. For a Community Park proposed to draw from 1/4 mile, if you add parking are you not trying to pull people from farther away - this seemed inconsistent to me. Almost seems like less parking would serve to prioritize use for the local community, and potentially lead to further traffic challenges.

The other area would be community-stated concerns over maintenance capacity - this should be well understood and studied in advance of the community making an investment in adding amenities which can not be safely maintained. If the answer is that the city can maintain these amenities, then I am in favor of additional development. I keep hearing this is a concern - but have not heard attempts to address this transparently.

Thank you for sharing the pictures of the nature-themed elements, many of them are quite appealing.

I would avoid fencing as much as possible as this is a significant concern for the wildlife movement." Barbara Troupin
2/2/22
Cipriani Park Dog park should be renovated w/fake turf and split into two separate areas- one for big dogs and one for little.

Monica Ryan
2/12/22
Ralston
Ranch Park
I really like the idea of a small kids playground in the park. None of the current facilities are in walking distance for the residents of Ralston Ranch, Chistian Dr and others in the Skymont neighborhood.

Nikhil Madan
2/23/22
O'Donnell
Park
I am one of the Co-Presidents of the Homeview Neighborhood Association. I've asked a few local neighbors that are frequent users of the park of their thoughts about some of the proposed upgrades/ additions to O'Donnell. Regarding the possibility of a water play space, one neighbor noted that the two nearby water play spaces in San Carlos/San Mateo are very crowded in the summertime and parking was an issue at those sites. O'Donnell only has limited street parking. Another voiced a concern about water waste, particularly during the ongoing droughts we are having. Other items - Yes, replacing the well work current BBQ's is needed. Some of the automated sprinklers should be extended to a couple of tree's that were planted several years ago, not making much progress due to lack of water in those areas. We've attempted to hand-water, but it's difficult.

Michael Fabel
2/25/22
Barrett
Community
Center
On of the most enriching experiences one can have in Belmont is to watch the dogs scampering about in the enclosed area while the owners enjoy a social visit. Unfortunately, for reasons unfathomable by most sentient beings, the park is off-limits most of the year while the field remains unused. I'm told Belmont devotes a portion of the resources to responding to complaints by some toothless hag living adjacent to the park anytime a resident brings her dog to the field 'off hours'.

Belmont, alone on the peninsula, has a weird way of meeting the needs of their citizens. A manic love of regulations and a need to exercise power characterizes decades of poor governance in this insignificant town. You have this opportunity to embrace the beauty of dogs running free and their owners enjoying friendly banter. It's a beautiful sight.

Jerry Boyke
2/26/22
Wakefield
Park
I support keeping Wakefield Park largely the way it is and oppose any further development of the Park. This is a small park for the immediate neighborhood. It serves its purpose well. I understand some may see the park as needing human development; I see the park as a perfect natural area (when it's not sprayed with herbicides). Before the herbicides were sprayed I would lay on the oak leaves under the magnificent oak trees and just enjoy the surroundings.

The park was a requirement when our homes were built and the intent was for it always to remain a simple, natural setting with a couple of benches and a short path.

REPAIRING portions of the path is warranted. I urge that we repair what is currently there instead of tearing out and rebuilding.

Environmentalism must be included in everything we do. But, sadly it is not included in the PROS plan.

Waste and adding to the landfill is not environmentally justified.

Reducing our waste is critical to preserving natural resources and minimizing the use of landfills.

Repairing and refurbishment involve reusing resources and preventing the use of more resources.

Sadly, this is not reflected in any portions of the PROS process or proposal. A green PROS plan would include refurbishment & reuse, use of post-consumer recycled products, general practices that promote the use of plant-based or post-consumer ""plastics"" (structures, waste bags), etc.

Our local landfill is expected to be full within a few years and Recology has not identified a new dumpsite.

Deniz Bolbol
2/28/22
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX D DRAFT
1044
Community Outreach
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 517

DRAFT PARK-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION COMMENTS

PARK COMMENT COMMENTER
Wakefield
Park
(con’t)
People with physical challenges would likely have difficulty getting up the hill to the park ... not every area can be ADA accessible; Wakefield Park is one of those areas.

Please include in the MP working with local neighbors who want to adopt the Park to ensure it remains a natural area with healthy native habitat and not a dead zone sprayed with herbicide.

Thank you.

Deniz Bolbol
2/28/22
O'Donnell
Park
The current draft of the plan on this website indicates that the half basketball court would be converted to a water play space with spray elements. I strongly disagree with the conversion of the basketball court to a new amenity since it is frequently used by neighbors and Belmont residents. In fact, the court is the usual meeting space for our annual Homeview Halloween parade and costume contest. In addition, I do not believe there is a strong desire for the water play feature in this community given the megadrought, which will most likely mean that the water spray features will not be in use for prolonged periods of time.

If the water play space must be featured in the PROS Master Plan, it should be installed adjacent to the smaller children's playground. There is a small concrete landing in between the basketball court and playground (at the end of the sidewalk slope) where this feature could be added without impacting the basketball court.

Thank you consideration of this comment.

Caroline Pyrz
Caroline Pyrz
3/2/22
Hallmark
Park
I support maintaining the current walking paths and welcome commissioners' ideas regarding using a more natural looking, possibly more environmental and more durable material than asphalt. Glad you have already started maintenance on the tennis courts and adding pickle ball lines for another recreational activity but we already have 20,000 visitors per year entering our small Hallmark Park entrance and don't need to attract more visitors. Adding more oaks and native trees to replace the non-natives is welcome.

Agree with commissioners that leaving the steep upper meadow alone is the right choice as well as eliminating the bocce court idea for Hallmark. That may be a good idea for Twin Pines Park Community Center. I am not opposed to upgrading the current tot lot with new equipment as long as it fits in the current landscape but I am not in favor of any big McDonald playland type structures that would require excavation and removal of trees ruining our natural setting, beauty and tranquility that we currently enjoy.

Thank you for listening to the residents.

Jennifer Lien
3/4/22
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Community Outreach
1045

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1046
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 519
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
1/14/2021 Dear Park Commissioners,
With as few as 1,000 remaining, this beauty below is the rare and endangered San Francisco garter snake, christened “the most beautiful serpent in North America.” It is found ONLY in SF and the peninsula, and needs a riparian (pond/wetland) habitat for survival.

I have seen one in Waterdog, and they are documented on the General Plan Conservation Element as present in Waterdog, but they are very rare and are protected under the Endangered Species Act (U.S Fish and Wildlife Service).

If you are not aware of this beautiful creature, and our legal obligation to protect it, I highly recommend visiting this website to fully appreciate the importance of the disappearing riparian habitat that supports the few remaining animals; https://sfgartersnake.wixsite.com/dhsseadisc/why-should-you-care:

Moreover I urge you to take immediate action to close the illegally built trail, cut by bikers, that bisects Waterdog marsh, trampling and fragmenting one of the few remaining habitats of this rare and endangered snake.

That trail violates both the existing Park Master Plan (which stipulates no development in that marsh) and the John Brooks Contract, and it contradicts the General Plan Conservation Element.

Kristin Mercer
2/20/2021
and
2/27/2021
As residents of Belmont, we support keeping Waterdog Open Space an accessible and sustainable place for recreation, connecting with nature and building community. In the new Master Plan, we request you to consider:
· Maintaining the trails, as they are, for multi-use for hiking, biking, dog walking, exercise, connecting with nature, etc., consistent with best practices of other open spaces · Continuing outreach and education to trail users and groups to ensure safe and sustainable use of our trails. The “Love Waterdog” campaign is great.
· Continuing to collaborate with community groups and volunteers to support the maintenance and preservation of the trails. They are doing a great job along with Belmont P&R workers. Our trails get healthier every year.
· Exploring options for new trails to spread people out and relieve congestion · Installing additional benches at key view spots
Open space recreation carries enormous benefits for the folks that live in Belmont - a local park for stress reduction, exercise, revitalization, appreciation of nature, inculcation of conservationist and environmentalist ideals, fostering community pride, and improvement of quality of life. Our community has a need for recreational open space - Water dog has served this public need well for decades.

Karen and John
Moody
2/23/2021 I often hike the trails at Waterdog Lake and would like to remind the Parks and Recreation Commissioners that this area is also known as the John Brooks Memorial Open Space. Isn't this because the land was donated by John Brooks? As I understand it, the land was donated with the expressed purpose of preserving a natural space. Please bear this in mind when considering any trail developments that might put recreational biking (trail biking and in particular extreme mountain biking, which is really a sport) above the preservation the natural landscape and habitat. Indeed, I am very opposed to the construction of any trails that would cater to or attract anyone engaging in extreme mountain biking (which I assume involves high speeds and jumping). This is would also open the city up to unnecessary liability. Furthermore, I sincerely hope that the you are not still considering locating a bike pump track within Waterdog Open Space. Such a track does NOT belong there!!
Connie
Tettenborn
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1047

APPENDIX I
520 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
2/27/2021 Dear Parks and Recreation Commissioners and City Council, My name is Jack Gaynor and I am writing to provide a public comment for the Belmont Open Space Master Plan. My fiance and I have lived in the area and have enjoyed using the Open Spaces over the past three years that they were one of the deciding factors in our decision to settle here and start our family.

The various open spaces, particularly Waterdog, have been a constant source of joy over the past years, particularly during 2020. We are both hikers, mountain bikers and trail runners, and the multi-use nature of all the trails as they currently are has been one of the things we love about Waterdog as it means we can vary how we can enjoy the open space from day to day.

I have also volunteered with the Waterdog Trailkeepers to maintain the trails, fixing issues with drainage and adjusting the existing trails to better suit the multi-use nature, and I really appreciate that the Belmont Parks and Recreation department is collaborative in the care and maintenance of the trails.

As such I support keeping Waterdog Open Space an accessible and sustainable place for recreation, connecting with nature and building community, for all trail users. In the new Master Plan, I request you to consider:

Maintaining the trails, as they are, for multi-use for hiking, biking, dog walking, exercise, connecting with nature, etc., consistent with best practices of other open spaces Continuing outreach and education to all trail users and groups to ensure safe and sustainable use of our trails. The “Love Waterdog” campaign is great, and the signage really helps to share the nature of Waterdog.

Continuing to collaborate with community groups and volunteers to support the maintenance and preservation of the trails. Speaking personally I think we are doing a great job along with Belmont P&R workers, and our trails get healthier every year.

Open space recreation carries enormous benefits for the families that live in Belmont - a local park for stress reduction, exercise, revitalization, appreciation of nature, cultivating conservationist and environmentalist ideals, fostering community pride, and improvement of quality of life. Our community has a need for recreational open space for all trail users - Waterdog has served this public need well for decades and I hope that the Master Plan will continue this great history into the future.

Please feel free to contact me if you need any additional comments.

Jack Gaynor
3/2/2021 I would like to recommend that the planned survey have “open ended” questions and also that the questions allow for resident comments whenever possible. That is, if the questions are designed to provide for pre-prepared potential answers to choose from, there should also be an opportunity for “other” whereby people can respond with their own created comments or answer.

Bob Stahl
3/2/2021 Dear Parks and Recreation Commissioners and City Council, I support keeping Waterdog Open Space an accessible and sustainable place for recreation, connecting with nature and building community. In the new Master Plan, I request you to consider:
• Maintaining the trails, as they are, for multi-use for hiking, biking, dog walking, exercise, connecting with nature, etc., consistent with best practices of other open spaces. • Continuing outreach and education to trail users and groups to ensure safe and sustainable use of our trails. The “Love Waterdog” campaign is great.
• Continuing to collaborate with community groups and volunteers to support the maintenance and preservation of the trails. They are doing a great job along with Belmont P&R workers. Our trails get healthier every year.

Open space recreation carries enormous benefits for the folks that live in Belmont - a local park for stress reduction, exercise, revitalization, appreciation of nature, cultivating conservationist and environmentalist ideals, fostering community pride, and improvement of quality of life. Our community has a need for recreational open space - Waterdog has served this public need well for decades.

Personally, mountain biking at Waterdog has been my number one source of physical and mental health for over ten years. More recently I now also ride with my kids there. It is a critical part of my health, happiness and well being. It is one of my favorite places on earth and I hope you keep it accessible for all.

Jay Maloney
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1048
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 521
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/3/2021 My name is Julianne Kline and I am writing to provide a public comment for the Belmont Open Space Master Plan. My fiance and I have been enjoying Waterdog Park for years, so much so that we have recently bought a home 3 miles away.

Waterdog is one of the major venues where I learned to mountain and gravel bike over the past three years. Since it’s so close to home (we lived nearby before the home purchase too), I can ride directly from my door to the park. It is the only place to mountain bike in the area where I do not need to load my bike into my car to get there, which makes it a convenient and environmentally friendly option. The park is also technical, and gives a newer biker like me a chance to work on difficult skills.

During this tough pandemic, Waterdog had kept me and my fiance sane. I love gravel biking up Lake Road Trail, up through Sheep Camp Trail where I can come out on Canada Road. After hours on end stuck inside working from home, I enjoy taking breaks to hike the Crystal Springs Cross Country Trail. The trails are so beautiful and fun. I’ve recently explored San Juan Canyon which I discovered through word-of-mouth. More signage on these trails would help in making them more accessible to the community.

Thank you for maintaining the beautiful trails and open spaces. I urge you to continue maintaining the trails for all trail users in the future plans, such that the multi-use nature of the trails will be retained for those of us who enjoy hiking, biking, dog walking, exercising, walking, etc. We look forward to building a life and a family here, and look forward to many years to come of use of the Belmont Open Spaces.

Julianne K
3/3/2021 Dear Belmont Parks and Recreation Commissioners and Open Space Master Plan Advisory Committee:

Please create a separate process in the Master Plan to address future management of the Waterdog open space. Do not combine it with sporting activities or recreation classes.

Waterdog used to be a wonderful place to take peaceful nature hikes. However lately the mountain bikes are taking over the trails. Some of them are considerate. But many tear up the trails, go off trail, or ride at inappropriate times like after a rainfall when the trails are soft and vulnerable to erosion. Senior citizens (like myself) especially are starting to feel less comfortable hiking there because of the trail damage hazards and because of the fear of being hit by a bike. We can’t jump out of the way of an oncoming bike as quickly as we did when we were younger.

Please save the precious Waterdog native habitat for wildlife and low-impact hiking.

Carol Wilhelmy
3/3/2021 Dear Belmont City Council,
I am a long time resident of Belmont living and owning a home here for the past 35 years. My family and I have greatly enjoyed living in Belmont and have had much joy in being able to access Waterdog Open Space for recreational purposes including hiking and biking. It has served as a wonderful area for us as a community and spending time with family and friends of all ages connecting with nature. Our community has a need for this type of space, which Waterdog has served well for many years improving the quality of life in Belmont! I am reaching out to you as I understand that you are in process of developing a new Master Plan for this area.

As you develop the new Master Plan, I ask that you please consider to maintain the existing trails which are used for multiple purposes including exercising such as hiking, biking and dog walking, as well as community building and connecting with nature. These types of activities align with those of other Open Spaces in the area. I believe that the current volunteers and community groups who maintain the trails are doing an awesome job and the trails are in great shape.

I understand that there has been some discussion to change the park designation to be preserved as a wildlife preserve. I believe this would have negative impact on the overall Belmont community. Waterdog park is surrounded on all sides by residential development and the existing wildlife has adapted to the presence of people in this area. We are fortunate to already have a 23,000 acre wildlife preserve nearby on the other side of 280 (the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Peninsula Watershed). Keeping the Waterdog Open Space as the recreational park it is today is one of the highlights that leads my family to desire to stay in this area.

One of the activities that I personally enjoy in Waterdog is being able to ride my mountain bike in a safe and natural environment which is easily accessible from my home. The alternative to this would be to ride in the city streets with much traffic where even an experienced biker such as myself does not feel safe; unfortunately there are few bike lanes in Belmont and the roads are not wide enough to be bike friendly.

The only other option involves loading my bike and driving a distance to find another place to ride, which is not convenient nor good for the environment.

Chris Miller
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1049

APPENDIX I
522 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/3/2021
(con’t)
Just five years ago another Belmont institution, Belmont Iceland, closed operations suddenly and ended its long history of community recreation. Personally, I was involved with the hockey community there from 1978 until it closed in 2016. Needless to say, I was quite disappointed losing such an important part of our community. I had hoped that the city of Belmont could have kept the rink from closing permanently.

Looking ahead to todays agenda and the possibility of not allowing mountain biking at Waterdog in Belmont, I stand strong in my convictions that this should not be allowed to happen for all the reasons stated above. For this 35 year resident of Belmont, I would very much like to see the Waterdog Open Space area remain the wonderful area it is serving the recreational needs of our community.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Chris Miller
3/4/2021 Dear Commissioners,
I previously sent a comment via the contact link on the Parks and Open Space Plan website (https:// belmontprosplan.com/). While I understand that our parks and open space areas are available for anyone to use, it appears that there is no line asking for the home address or at least the city of residence to verify that the opinions of Belmont residents are prioritized in the community input regarding the Master Plan. Will the online survey have such a requirement?
There is ample documentation referring to Waterdog Lake as an Open Space Area. This designation should not be changed, and as an Open Space, motorized vehicles (including electric bikes) should be prohibited as stated in the 1992 Master Plan. Is there still a plan to build a bike pump track at Waterdog Lake? I am very opposed to this idea and would like to know where things stand with that earlier proposal.

Connie
Tettenborn
3/4/2021 To whom it may concern,
I’d love to see the city of Belmont build a skatepark- a few parents I know are going to try to go and support this idea.

Hays Michael
3/4/2021 Hello, I am very interested in seeing a Belmont skatepark constructed. Unfortunately I am not able to make the proposal meeting tonight, but I wanted to still voice my support. Thanks.

Joel Hamill
3/4/2021 Greetings, I’m a co-owner of Atlas Skateboard Store in San Mateo. We are the premiere shop that takes care of the skateboarders of the peninsula. We even have an employee that was born, raised and still lives in Belmont. I was his mentor at Carlmont HS about 12 years ago and then we hired him when he was old enough.

I will not be able to attend tonight’s meeting, but want to express my desire on behalf of the local youth to include a skateboard park in the planning as it is greatly needed in Belmont. Also, please involve skateboarders in the design process so as to not flub it as we have seen happen in other cities.

Thank you for hearing me out and feel free to reach out to me any time.

Mike Manidis
3/4/2021 To whom it may concern,
I unfortunately can’t make the virtual meeting for tonight’s master plan. However, I would like the voice the need for more skateparks in the Bay Area, specifically the desire to see a skatepark built in the City of Belmont.

I work at Atlas Skateboard Store in San Mateo and as someone born and raised in San Mateo I spent a great deal of my life in Belmont. In the recent past I have seen many Bay Area cities build skateparks and would love to see Belmont follow suit to help sustain the rising amount of skateboarders on The Peninsula.

Skateparks (or public places made available for skating) have a net positive effect on the community and would benefit the community greatly.

Patrick
Beaudouin
3/4/2021 I cannot attend the meeting today. But I am very excited to see a fun place to skateboard being built in Belmont.

Derik Stevenson
3/4/2021 My name is Wayne Nguyen, I won’t be able to attend the master meeting tonight. I do I want to discuss about having a skatepark for Belmont, it would add more public attention to the city. Please consider building a skatepark.

Wayne Nguyen
3/4/2021 I am unable to join tonights master plan meeting for a skatepark in belmont. I was born and raised in the area and always wished there was a skatepark in belmont. I would love to see one built for the community to enjoy.

Tim Quinn
3/4/2021 Hello my name is Greg Smith and I work at Thrasher Magazine and grew up in San Carlos. I won’t be able to make the meeting tonight but I would very much like to see a skatepark built down there. Please keep me informed and also if there is anything I can do or future meetings. Thank you so much and good luck! Greg Smith
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1050
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 523
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/4/2021 Skating has truly become one of the best ways for me to spend quality time with my son without having to feel like Im forcing him. Having a park local to us would be amazing and I strongly encourage you all to build one for the community.

John Shea
3/4/2021 I am not able to attend tonight’s Master Plan meeting, but I want to share with you now my desire for a skateboard park to be a part of Belmont’s future. I am 40 years old, have a PhD in mathematics, have worked as a professor and a community outreach program director, and have been a skateboarder for over 25 years. I know the value of skateboarding as a recreation, a culture, and a way of learning life lessons. I know that the people, young an old, of Belmont would benefit from a skatepark in their city Jack Love
3/4/2021 Hello,Unfortunately I won’t be able to join tonight’s master plan meeting. But I would love to see a skatepark being built for me, my son and for all of us in the community.

Daniel Beck
3/4/2021 I will be unable to make the meeting regarding the Belmont skatepark tonight. I wanted to reach out regardless, in order to express that I would love to see this project come to light. I feel that it would be a positive contribution to the community and the youth. Please feel free to reach out if needed.

John Voskuyl
3/4/2021 My name is Jake London, a local lifelong skateboarder and Sales Representative for some of the top brands in the industry (e.g., Santa Cruz Skateboards). I am unable to join tonight's meeting, but am interested in your master plan and would love to see a skatepark included in these plans. There are 2.2 million new skateboarders in the world as a result of 2020, and the positive mental and physical effects of this activity are invaluable. This is especially true of the youth at this time.

Jake London
3/4/2021 I wanted to express my support for a skate park in Belmont. I’m unable to attend tonight’s meeting.

In the past I organized youth support for other city’s skate parks and worked with park and rec departments to create safe skate programs that benefit riders of all ages.

Skateboarding has opened up a lot of paths in life because it is a community sport that teaches perseverance, struggle along with granting sweet rewards for hard work.

Please consider the positive effects having a skate park can have on the community and local businesses.

Larry Thomas
3/4/2021 My apologies for not being able to attend the meeting in person tonight I was pulled into work for a production emergency. I really hope you seriously consider a skateboard in the city of Belmont. Not only is it necessary to give kids a place to hang out, it’s a place where kids learn the hard lessons in life. Where they learn how to overcome objectives, interact with all different types of people, and form a community of peers in which they learn to rely on. With parents being forced to work long hours to make ends meet it is more and more necessary to have safe hang out spots for our youth. Skateboarding is entering the Olympics and the state of California has always been a driving force in not only the sport but the industry as well. If the city doesn’t consider sanctioning off space for a skatepark it is isolating a community from something they love. Please take this into consideration and thank you for your time.

Joey Escobar
3/4/2021 Unfortunately I am not able to attend tonight’s master plan meeting but I would like to state that I am fully in favor of a skatepark being built. Skateparks are vital to the communities they are built in as they keep the community active and act as a second home to a lot of kids. Please consider this when making your decision.

Gabby Mejia
3/4/2021 Hey there my name is Jesse Narvaez I won’t be able to join the meeting tonight but I’d love to say a few words thru email. I grew up in Redwood City but always skated all around the peninsula and from my 23 years of experience being a skateboarder I know that having a skatepark in your city helps a lot with kids staying out of trouble and best of all making friends. I now started my own skateboard company called Loopholewheels and I know that if it wasn’t for the Phil Shao memorial skatepark in Redwood City I wouldn’t be the same person I am today. Thank you for your time I hope Belmont gets its own skatepark in the near future.

Jesse Narvaez
3/4/2021 Hello, my name is Marissa. I won’t be able to join tonights meeting but I wanted to show my interest in the idea of a new park being built.I have met so many great people in just my one year of skating and having a new park would be an amazing opportunity to meet more friends in the community, get outside away from constant technology and learn some new skills you never thought you could do. It’s been very mentally healthy for me and so many people I’ve met and I hope to see more of it.

Marissa Rod
3/4/2021 I am writing as a 40 year old Carlmont high school graduate and avid skateboarder. I am not able to make it to tonight’s meeting, but I would absolutely love to see a skate park in Belmont Jack Shirley
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1051

APPENDIX I
524 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/4/2021 Unfortunately I am unable to join tonight’s meeting. However I would like the city to know that I fully support the plans to build a skate park.

Not only is a skatepark a place to build community, but it helps give kids and young adults (and adults!) a sense of purpose and place where they can exercise, practice discipline, build friendships and a community of their own.

As a successful business owner and skateboarder myself, I truly value everything that skateboarding and it’s global and local community has done for me. It has sent me around the world and built connections and friendships that have helped me succeed in my life.

I truly hope the city will move forward with plans and recognizes the value and impact a skate park will bring to Belmont’s thriving community and city.

Ian Ernzer
3/4/2021 cant make it tonight, but I want to say that skate parks are a safe outside individual activity that should be encouraged
Please do a skate park in Belmont.

David Keagy
3/4/2021 I'm not able to attend tonight's master plan meeting but we would love to see a skatepark built for the community and the youth of Belmont. I've been skateboarding for over 20 years and it has taught me so many invaluable life lessons as well as introduced me to life time friends that I still am close with today. I'd love to help in the future and crossing my fingers i can one day bring my kids there! Mike Richins
3/4/2021 Unfortunately, I am unable to attend tonight’s Master Plan Meeting. Rather than attending I want to register my support for the skatepark here.

Skateboarding has changed significantly in the past 20 years. Not only is it shaping up to be one of the most viewed events in the 2021 olympics it is also a possible remedy to the nation’s growing obesity problem among the young.

I think the building of a new skatepark will support the following -Offer a space for children and adults to participate in a free, accessible, and diverse physical activity. -Offer a place for high school age kids to meet and engage in healthy activity -Provide a place for kids to learn how to skateboard with the future possibility of representing their country and city in the olympics
There is very little other than the financial hurdles that will not be ultimately beneficial from the skatepark being built.

James Beavis
3/4/2021 Hi,
Growing up, there was never a good option for us to go skate without skating in private property and getting tickets. I think it would be a great addition for Belmont and get the youth outdoors. I would also enjoy spending time riding. Please consider this when voting.

Max Krieg
3/4/2021 Thank you so much for your assistance with creating a master plan in regards to our aim to building a skatepark, I'd still love to see the skatepark being built.

Tomoko Oikawa
3/4/2021 I am unable to make tonights master plan meeting, but I would love to see a skatepark built in Belmont! Tobin Valverde 3/4/2021 I heard the city is having a meeting about building a skatepark and I really wanted to go but I’m unavailable.

I’ve been living in the Bay Area my entire life and just recently city’s have started building parks and I say the more the better. It doesn’t have to be a major project with a huge pool and big ramps but just a plaza style skatepark is best.

Nick Perez
3/4/2021 I am personally in favor of adding a skateboard park to our community. A skateboard park will offer the youth of our community a safe and productive place to skateboard instead of in local parking lots. I hope you consider my thoughts on the issue
Dustin Waters
3/4/2021 The youth of Belmont would greatly benefit from having a skatepark built Jordan Herz 3/4/2021 Hello, I am available to attend the Belmont master plan but I would suggest a skatepark to be built for all the local citizens and nearby ones.

I think it would be great as anyone can enjoy a skatepark.

Lester Legarda
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1052
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 525
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/4/2021 Hi my name is Robert Miron and I am unable to attend tonights meeting about the Belmont Master Plan. I grew up skateboarding in San Mateo and have lived in many places around the world, but throughout my travels and localities i would always reflect on how fortunate i was to not only grow up in the peninsula, but that i also grew up with a skatepark and the world of skateboarding in San Mateo. I think it is essential for Belmont to build a skatepark and budget one into it's master plan because there are no skate parks in Belmont and with the creativity and potential of students from Carlmont high school, a skatepark would fit right in and further foster an alternative outlet for Belmont and the surrounding peninsula citie Robert Miron
3/4/2021 Sorry I’m not able to join the master plan meeting tonight about the skate park being built I think you guys should make it tho. Take some kids off the streets help out some kids learn some healthy active sports Sean Rael
3/4/2021 I am sending this in regards to the skatepark, as I possibly cannot make the meeting tonight at 7. Being a skateboarder from the peninsula for over 10 years, the idea of a new park brings a lot of excitement. There hasn’t been a lot of new skateparks, and the parks in the area are definitely outdated and becoming rough.

I think a new park brings a lot of positivity and brings the community together, considering since covid has hit skateparks have become more crowded. Thank you for putting the new skatepark into consideration, and hopefully we can have a new skatepark soon!
Matthew Mehl
3/4/2021 My name is Nicholas Hutter and I have been a resident of Belmont for 31 years. I grew up in this town. And not only did I grow up in this town I grew up skateboarding in this town. Obviously my opinion may seem biased, but I can say with absolute certainty that the building of a decent sized, well built, yet simple, and not overly expensive skatepark along with the renovation of the Barret community center would bring great value to Belmont and our community. I propose the beginning of setting plans into action to rebuild our community center, if you can really call it that(I know it used to be an old school), and include a skatepark.

At least that's where I had envisioned it since there appears to be room. I would love to see a few things change in Belmont, which would greatly increase Belmonts value, but this would be a great start. Who am I? Just a local resident who believes in providing the highest quality experience to all people around the world and of course in your immediate community. Let's do this! Nicholas Hutter
3/4/2021 Hello, I was unable to attend last nights meeting and would very much like a skatepark Belmont can call its own.

Skateparks are a source of wholesome entertainment and exercise and bring joy to a wide and diverse range of people. I am 40 years old and still am gravitated to skateparks after 25 years of skateboarding! Please supply our community with a skatepark
Nathan Perkel
3/4/2021 My apologies for not participating in the community call yesterday evening, March 4, 2021 at 7:00pm.

However, I am writing to you now asking you to please hear us skateboarders out by saying we need a new skatepark; specifically in the city of Belmont.

Speaking as a representative of the Skatepark on Treasure Island, as well as multiple other skateparks I have participated in donating for as well as build; having a well built, concrete skateboard park is the best alternative for the youth of today.

Having a skateboard park in the city of Belmont would give many children, as well as young and even older adults a healthy way to exert their time and energy. Especially during these times of Covid, and self quarantine. I believe the citizens, not only of Belmont, but the larger Bay Area would greatly appreciate your consideration in building a skateboard park.

Clay Howell
3/5/2021 Hello All,
I emailed the following to the Parks and Recreation commission, but I think it is good to send it here as well because otherwise I do not know whether the information would be available to everyone in the advisory committee and all consultants.

I attended the first advisory committee zoom meeting, and a question I asked was not answered. I wondered whether the Master Plan process included the ability to re-designate an Open Space area because, for several reasons, it appears that the difference between a park and an open space is not well understood or appreciated by the advisory committee, the consultant(s) and perhaps even some Commissioners. For example, I asked for clarification of “bike repair stations”, and a panelist replied that they could be in either a park or open space. Since if I remember correctly, this item in the survey was listed in the same space as permanent restroom facilities (with flush toilets?), this would suggest that the commission thinks it would be OK to build such facilies at Water Dog Lake Open Space. An open space is an essentially undeveloped area with the aim of preservation. Developments such as flush toilets and bike pump tracks and electric bikes do not belong in an Open Space preserve. Bike repair stations could be located in a parking lot area but not on the trails, but I would place them elsewhere in Belmont first if funds are limited.

Connie
Tettenborn
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1053

APPENDIX I
526 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/5/2021
(con’t)
The definition and distinction between Parks and Open Spaces should be clearly presented at the beginning of the survey. (I do recall some separate sections for these two in the survey, but not the specifics.) Another point I asked about was addressed to some extent. I said that “widening trails” should not beconsidered a “trail improvement” because widening a narrow single-use trail would encourage even greater IMPROPER use of such a trail by bicyclists. Indeed, the concept of a single-use trail for hikers only has been totally ignored by the City. The 1992 Master Plan has a map of Water Dog Lake Open Space, which indicates that the loop trail around the lake is for hiking only. Unfortunately, not only is Water Dog Lake Open Space referred to as a Park in various online places, but Trailforks.com, which in part caters to mountain bikers, lists the Loop trail with 4 stars for bikers. The Berry trail is also listed for mountain bike use on this site. The incorrect listing of Water Dog Lake “Park” on this site should be removed and signs should clearly state NO BIKES on these trails. The maps of the area provided by the city should also mark them as foot traffic only. If part of the Hidden Valley area is not designated as Open Space, perhaps a trail there could be for only bikes?
Another point I made regarding the survey and residency was also addressed, but I think that the question should be placed near the beginning of the survey, not the end, and should be required-- the form could not be completed or submitted if the question is left blank. Further, the options of “Don’t know” or “Not sure” should be added along with “Not a Belmont resident” instead of “Other” because some new folks may not know the name of their neighborhood. (I didn’t when I first moved here.) In this way, it will be possible to clearly identify which interests and priorities are those of Belmon citizens who are the ones paying city taxes.

Thank you for considering my points.

Connie Tettenborn
Connie
Tettenborn
3/7/2021 Hello All,
I would like to amend my earlier suggestion that the difference between Parks and open spaces be explained at the start of the survey so that residents will understand that there is a priority for preservation in open spaces. This introduction should include a clarification that Water Dog Lake is an example of an open space, and it should be stated that there is currently a ban on motorized vehicles at Water Dog Open Space. Because whether this ban includes e-bikes is debatable, a question should be added to the survey to specifically ask whether e-bikes should be prohibited in Water Dog preserve; the current ban is not being enforced regarding e-bikes, since the police chief (a mountain bike proponent) believes that he is enforcing the spirit of the law because, in his view, pedal-assist e-bikes are really no different from regular bikes.

Yet according to what I have seen on Nextdoor.com, even some mountain bikers believe e-bikes should be prohibited. In the Advisory Committee meeting last week, I recall that e-bikes were included in a part of the survey, but I do not recall where and the video recording was not clear enough to tell. Because this is a complex topic--there are three different classes of e-bikes; it is not feasible to enforce speed limits; some bikes have much wider tires with potentially greater trail impacts--I do not think that the city should allow such bikes in our Open Spaces without proper review. A follow-up survey question to whether e-bikes should be prohibited should be “Should research into allowing e-bikes in Water Dog Open Space be carried out?”
Note that from the Midpeninsula Open Space website: “Electric bicycles are not, and have never been, allowed on Midpen trails, except for use by individuals with a mobility disability on trails where bicycles are allowed.” Instead of just letting people make their own decisions, signs that specifically prohibit e-bikes are currently posted at Midpen trailheads. It is true that due to public interest, “[Midpen] Staff will initiate a short-term unpaved trails study to start by summer/fall 2021 on lands of a regional partner agency where e-bikes are currently allowed,” but at least they are doing the appropriate analysis.

Decisions regarding the use of e-bikes is very critical because of the many sites online that refer to trails in Water Dog Open Space: Mtbproject.com (in which the description of a Water Dog Lake trail ends with”...a ripsnortingly fast ride. Have fun!”), mtbr.com (which has an advocacy forum for e-bikes), singletrack.com, (which specifically says e-bikes are allowed at Water Dog Lake). Thus, if e-bikes are not allowed elsewhere but are allowed here in Belmont’s open space, the resulting increase in such bikes here would clearly negatively impact the peaceful enjoyment of the natural environment by hikers and the safety of both hikers and bikers. (An electric motor as small as that in an electric toothbrush makes an annoying buzz that can be heard 30 ft away in a different room!) Even if Belmont citizens want e-bikes in Water Dog Open Space, I strongly suggest that they be banned if Midpeninsula Open Space bans e-bikes at the completion of their study.

Regards,
Connie Tettenborn
Connie
Tettenborn
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1054
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 527
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/7/2021 Dear City Council Members,
We are Belmont residents and would like to share our opinion regarding the consideration to ban cycling from Waterdog. Both of our kids grew-up biking in these trails and our family enjoys daily walks through the park with our chocolate lab.

The use of all open spaces has increased during the pandemic, and we are happy to see how our local trails have offered residents an option for healthy outdoor activity during these difficult times. The increased traffic comes with challenges, and it is clear that some modifications may be needed. However, we must remember that as the pandemic gets under better control some of this increase in use will decline.

We have heard/seen arguments from both sides on this issue and it is clear that few people in the community have very strong opinions regarding this topic. While they may be the loudest, we do think they represent the character of our community and the friendliness that we see from almost everyone in the trails.

We would support the following:

Maintain all current trails open to bikes and pedestrians. Prevent the development of any new trails.

Provide good maintenance to the current trails, and do not close any trails.

Close trails for bikes (as needed) after rain.

Prohibit night riding.

Prohibit the use of e-bikes.

Launch an education campaign to foster a culture of kindness, sharing and safety in the trails and in our community.

Open communication and cooperation between Belmont Parks and Recreation and volunteer groups to upkeep, educate, and enforce rules at Waterdog.

Thank you for all the work you do.

Mauricia
Ronderos
3/8/2021 Dear Parks and Recreation,
please add me to the distribution list for upcoming PROS questionnaires and upcoming events so that I may participate.

If OK, I would also like to forward the information to friends and neighbors to help get the word out.

All the best,
Thaddeus Block
Thaddeus Block
3/8/2021 As someone who has previously develop opinion polls, surveys and worked on focus groups, I found the survey difficult to follow due to the lack of organization and, in some questions, inconsistent use of categories (parks, open spaces, recreation facilities). Additionally, in some questions, conflating different categories and inconsistent use of terminology creates a lack of understanding of respondents’ intentions.

Confusing questions, leading options, and conflating categories make any survey ineffective by failing to yield an accurate understanding of respondents’ intentions. Inconsistencies and lack of organization may lead to confusion which would further negate capturing respondents’ true intentions. Lack of clarity creates confusion and results will be left to interpretations rather than yielding clear, understandable results.

Because people likely will not spend excessive time trying to understand the intention of the question(s) -- making things as clear as possible is desirable.

While I would be happy to provide detailed feedback, I have limited my comments to a few obvious clarifications that are needed:

1. #5 “”What factors limit your ability to visits our parks and open spaces”” “”ability”” refers to the participants’ “”skills”” or “”capability”” or “”talent”” - rather I think you seek the factors that limit visitors’ use of the parks and open spaces.

Clearly conflating parks and open spaces means you will not know which answers apply to which area -- parks or open spaces.

2. #5 relates to parks & open spaces and “”facilities”” []Poor condition/maintenance of facility
[]The facilities Does not accommodate my needs
Deniz Bolbol
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1055

APPENDIX I
528 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/8/2021
(con’t)
The word “”facilities”” has somewhat consistently be used to address recreation facilities -- now you use the word “”facilities”” in relation to parks and open spaces which is inconsistent and confusing

3. #7 please clarify by adding bold text: “”parks (not recreation facilities or open spaces)”” for clarification

4. #8 please clarify by adding bold text: “”outdoor recreation/athletic facilities (not open spaces or parks)”” for clarification

5. #9 please clarify by adding bold text: “”open spaces (not recreation facilities or parks)”” for clarification
Again, the questions that conflate categories will not yield meaningful responses because the respondents’ intention will be unknown. Ambiguous survey questions force an interpretation of the results; interpretation is usually not desired if capturing the respondents’ true intentions is the goal.

Deniz Bolbol
3/8/2021 I have reviewed your draft PROS opinion survey and find some of the terminology confusing, several omissions and several biased questions.

1. #2 & #3 questions, you bring up three separate entities; parks, outdoor recreation facilities and open spaces but then in #4, you refer to the third entity as recreation/athletic facilities and in #8 you go back to using outdoor recreation facilities. As some of the facilities listed in #4 such as Barrett Community Center and Twin Pines Park buildings have indoor as well as outdoor facilities, the terminology “”outdoor recreation facilities”” is confusing. Why not use the term indoor/outdoor recreation facilities for ALL questions to be consistent?

2. You omitted the Belmont Sports Complex as one of the most important indoor/outdoor recreation facilities in Belmont?? How about Hidden Canyon Open Space and John Brooks Open Space Preserve?

3. In #9, the question should just read “”The following would greatly enhance my experience with open spaces in Belmont”” (delete amenities and uses which is confusing). You also have a typo (it should be just open, not opens spaces).

Widen and improve select existing trails is a biased question because it implies improvement which everybody favors and will elicit a strongly agree. You will then incorrectly infer that participants want wider trails.

Reduce/limit number of trails is similarly biased because it implies restrictions which nobody wants and will elicit a strongly disagree. You will then incorrectly infer that participants want more trails.

Since you allow everybody who are non residents of Belmont to answer your survey from all over the country, the answers to this survey will also represent organized special interest groups that have far more numbers than our ordinary citizens of Belmont. Therefore, this survey alone should not be used to determine the outcome of a 15 year Master Plan for our City of Belmont. Doing so could devalue property values and our tax base as well as irreversibly damage the eco-system and geological stability in our open spaces.

Thank you for your attention.

Jennifer Lien
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1056
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 529
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/9/2021 Dear All,
I sent an email to the Parks and Recreation Dept. before their January meeting and would like to share the pertinent information to everyone here because someone in the Advisory committee meeting asked about removing trails. I think the reply was that comments could be left. A possible reason for his question may be what I experienced on a hike on the Loop trail at Water Dog Lake. There was a very short bifurcation on this trail, and I took the left-hand trail to increase the social distance between me and my friend only to find that the trail had been modified into a bicycle ramp or jump that could not be walked down. This is the sort of unsanctioned trail that could be removed. I feel that simply having a place for additional comments would not fairly represent the community’s concerns about trails and bicycles in Water Dog Open Space. It is very easy to tick a box to say you have an interest in e-bikes or want wider trails, but it takes more effort to leave a comment. Does this place an inherent bias in the survey? Regarding widening trails, in that same January email, I said mentioned that the poison oak on narrow trails makes it hard to move to allow bikes to pass. I want to reiterate a comment I made at the Advisory committee meeting: widening such trails is NOT AN IMPROVEMENT as this would encourage greater improper usage of these trails by bicyclists AND widening certain trails would remove very beautiful species of flowers (there are a couple of purple perennial flowers at the edge of one trail--I think the Loop trail).

Rather, I think that bicycles should be restricted to wider trails. Finally, I want to encourage everyone to take into consideration the intent of the person who donated the land for Water Dog Open Space, which I believe was primarily to preserve a natural setting.

Regards,
Connie Tettenborn
Connie
Tettenborn
3/20/2021 I wanted to provide you my thoughts on the upcoming Master Plan for the Belmont Parks Department.

My husband and I have been residents of Belmont since 1985. We love the area and feel the Parks Department has done a lot to provide many avenues for recreation to all ages.

My major point I do want to make is regarding the Open Space Water Dog trails. Over the many years, we have lived here we walked or hiked the Water Dig trails literally hundreds of times. Our kids hiked there as well.

Over the last year however it has become too dangerous to hike or walk there due to the numerous bikers riding aggressively on the trails. There were several instances last year between May and September that my husband and I were nearly hit by bikers rounding curves which did not see us or we see them until they skidded into us. The fact that they ride on the single track trails is outrageous.

We’ve tried to bring our 6 year old and 8 year old on the trails and they too have nearly been hit by bikers.

As they are only 36 - 44 inches tall, bikers cannot see them running ahead of us. We now have to hold their hand if they want hike with us. As you can imagine, they do not want to be required to hold our hands on a 1-2 hour hike. Our daughter in law now refuses to let us take them on Water Dog trails out of fear for their safety.

I must also mention that many of our friends and neighbors also have stopped coming to the trails due to their concerns over the bikers on the single track trails. I think this is ridiculous that long time residents fear for their lives and will totally avoid these trails.

These single track trails should be kept open for walkers or hikers only. This should be a peaceful setting and not a situation where you need to be stressed and worried about your safety.

I also want to say that we used to see deer, rabbits and other wildlife. This does not happen anymore and I attribute this to the bikers racing on these trails.

Please make single track trails available only to hikers and walkers.

My understanding that this land was supposed to be a preserve per grants from John Brooks. In addition, previous Master Plans(1992 and 1998) required this. Why was this not followed? I hope you will bring the Open Space back to its original intent and use.

Thank you.

Pamela Stahl
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1057

APPENDIX I
530 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/29/2021 HI Karen,
How does one observe/join the following PROS presentations listed on the City website? Other Presentations/Events for the PROS Plan:

Belmont Rotary Presentation March 29th, 2021 12- 1 Pm
Presentation at BRSSD Superintendent Meeting March 2nd, 2021 Do I interpret correctly that this is the consultant addressing these groups and offering a Q&A after? Are the comments received at these meetings “on the record”; will they be recorded for inclusion in public comments?
Thanks,
Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
4/13/2021 Dear Parks and Recreation Commissioners and City Council Members, We have been Belmont residents for over thirty years and have raised our family here. Our three children have all gone through the local public schools; Central Elementary, Ralston Middle School and Carlmont High School (with the youngest now a Junior at Carlmont). In all these years we have greatly enjoyed the City’s open space, including Waterdog Lake / Hidden Canyon and San Juan Canyon / Sugarloaf Mountain.

This enjoyment includes walking, running, riding bicycles, exercising our dogs and enjoying nature. As you consider these open spaces in the new Master Plan, we urge you to maintain their current multi-use designation with no new restrictions.

Consistent with this, we fully support the “Love Waterdog” campaign and associated outreach and education to trail users and groups to ensure safe and sustainable use of our trails.

For the record, we are very grateful for the excellent work to maintain and enhance the trails and related facilities done by the partnership between the City’s Public Works department and various volunteers.

One request: Please install dog waste bags and garbage cans at the trailheads for San Juan Canyon (for example at the bottom of San Juan Blvd).

Patrick and Mai
Wheeler
4/16/2021 It is important that Belmont pays attention to it’s park trails. Right behind my home on Soho Circle is an ILLEGAL bike trail. The city has done NOTHING to protect me nor my neighbors from this trail. It is a disturbance to us and our neighbors. It is also a hinderance to our natural surroundings. It is also probably on my land. Many of us have complained to our Parks and Rec dept., but yet nothing gets done.

Also, on weekends, this bike trail as well as the walking trail creates a massive parking situation on Hallmark. Yet, nothing gets accomplished by the city to clear these problems.

WHAT CAN BE DONE???????
Kenneth.

Lebovitz
4/17/2021 Hi PROS Advisory Committee Members and Park Commissioners, Last September I was given the opportunity to lead a few Park Commissioners on a walking tour of Hidden Canyon. It’s very aptly named; most residents are largely unaware of this southern end of the Waterdog Open Space. But in fact Hidden Canyon is larger than the Waterdog acreage and the John Brooks acreage combined:

Waterdog 51 acres
John Brooks 49 acres
Hidden Canyon 180 acres
On our hike we stopped and discussed the extensive damages. We observed heavily eroded trails, especially on the southern slope where Rambler trail has ditches 4 feet deep and is widened to 30 feet in places. We saw drainage issues – some natural and some from homes above - that contribute to trail and slope damage. We hiked down the notorious Finch switchbacks, noting that no amount of maintenance could make them safe or sustainable. And we saw dirt and debris tossed into the creek – a direct violation of state guidelines for protection of riparian habitats.

All of this is even more saddening when you become familiar with the Western Hills Area Plan, adopted in 1990. The Plan recognizes the unique chaparral, riparian and oak woodland habitats of the canyon – areas that are now designated as “sensitive communities” for the diversity of plants and the animals that call them home. I urge you all to visit Hidden Canyon and to learn why it’s protection is so important to our regional Biodiversity Hotspot.

Thank you,
Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1058
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 531
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/18/2021 As a resident of San Mateo, I support keeping Waterdog Open Space an accessible and sustainable place for recreation, connecting with nature and building community. In the new Master Plan, I request you to consider:

Keep maintaining Waterdog Lake just as it is today. There are a ton of parks and outdoor spaces designated as “”hiking only”” available to hikers already, whereas mountain bikers already have very limited options. Please consider educating hikers that are uncomfortable sharing the trail about the hundreds of trails that are available for hiking exclusively in other areas. Closing Waterdog Lake Park to mountain bikers will result in people having less chances to engage in healthy exercise. I have biked dozes of times at Waterdog and never had any issues with hikers, it’s easy to be careful and polite and make space for each other, even on single track.

Some additional points:
• Maintaining the trails, as they are, for multi-use for hiking, biking, dog walking, exercise, connecting with nature, and community-building, consistent with best practices of other open spaces; • Continuing outreach and education to trail users and groups to ensure safe and sustainable use of our trails such as the excellent new “Love Waterdog” campaign. • Continuing to collaborate with community groups and volunteers to support the maintenance and preservation of the trails. They are doing a great job along with Belmont P&R workers. Our trails get healthier every year.
• Open space recreation has enormous benefits for the community, it’s a local park for stress reduction, exercise, revitalization, appreciation of nature, cultivating conservationist and environmentalist ideals, fostering community pride, and improvement of quality of life. Our community has a need for recreational open space - Water dog has served this public need well for decades. • Designating the park as a wildlife preserve makes little sense. The park is surrounded by all sides by residential development. The wildlife that that chooses to habitate there have adapted to the presence of humans. There is no need to designate this 300 acre park as a wildlife preserve when there is a 23,000 acre wildlife preserve just on the other side of 280, the San Francscico Public Utilites Commission Peninsula Watershed.

Fabian Frank
4/19/2021 Hello,
I support keeping Water Dog Open Space as a mountain biking friendly area. There are very few places like this in the Bay Area (maybe even country) and none on the Peninsula. Most other spaces in the Bay Area are for hikers only. This should be just thought of as a mountain biking park, it should get more funding to maintain the park but stay open to all types of use.

It seems that people who are against this are very Not In My Backyard, as there are plenty of nearby places for great hiking but none for mountain biking. More people need to get outside and mountain biking offers people an outlet. Bikers love the outdoors and appreciate it. The more people who enjoy the outdoors and can appreciate it the more likely they are to care about the environment in other ways, i.e eat less meat, drive less, recycle, consume less, etc.

All in all this is one of the best places to mountain bike in the area, people will have to drive hours to get to something similar. On top of that there is a very strong community around mountain biking at Water Dog and for years hikers, bikers, dog walkers, etc have all been able to enjoy the space with no real problems.

So I would like to see more funding in the master plan to support mountain biking and other uses at Water Dog.

Thanks,
Mike
Michael Jaron
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1059

APPENDIX I
532 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/19/2021 Hello All,
I forgot to email this to the above address so that all interested parties will receive this message regarding the survey. Are you getting ample input? Should the survey stay online longer? Thank you,
Connie
Dear Commissioners,
I just noticed an online plea for mountain bikers to fill out the survey. Given that anyone can fill out the survey and may not necessarily give an honest answer regarding residency, is there some analysis that can be done to determine whether the survey results are valid and give Belmont citizens’ views priority. We live here and pay city taxes and are responsible for the infrastructure here. Is there an estimated response rate, which could be compared with the number of people living in each neighborhood? Thank you,
Connie Tettenborn, PhD
Connie
Tettenborn
4/19/2021 To whom it may concern,
Our trails, through our open space and parks are being overrun by bikers, and now some with electric bikes. This is largely because other cities are outlawing bikes in their parks and open spaces.

These bikers disregard the safety of the walkers which always have to go off the trail to get out of their way often in unsafe situations like going up an embankment or into poison oak, unstable ground or a steep downslope. Many of the walkers are elderly and have a lot of trouble getting out of their way. Why are we making our parks and open spaces a playground for people that neighboring cities don’t want in their parks and open spaces?
We didn’t work hard to preserve our open spaces for bikers! We had no idea at the time that they would end up being the predominate users since many walkers are finding it unpleasant and too dangerous to use with the proliferation of bikers.
(I have a recurring fantasy of being blind and ‘accidentally’ poking my stick through the spokes of a fast passing bicycle.)
Gary Feierbach
4/21/2021 Hi,
I have been mountain biking in Water Dog for years and absolutely treasure it! It’s very unique to offer such amazing mountain biking right next to home.

Love sharing the space with all (hiking, groups, nature walks, etc.).

Please do not eliminate mountain bike riding there. There are many great hiking trails around, but only one place to mountain bike.

Cheers,
Julien
Julien Marcil
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1060
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 533
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/22/2021 Hi PROS committee and Park and Rec Commissioners, This Earth Day we are reflecting on sustainability for our planet. But since conservation begins at home, I’d like to address our sustainable stewardship of Belmont’s Open Spaces.

The first and foremost aspect of sustainability is balance. We want people to enjoy nature, but not to the detriment of the very thing they come to enjoy. That balance is achieved by managed trail density – enough trail access to enjoy nature, but not so much that it fragments habitats and destroys the ecosystem.

Last year I undertook a study of all open spaces within 20 miles of Belmont. I compiled data for 44 of the comparable preserves, and shared this data with Parks Commissioners. Now I urge you to watch the video of this presentation: Open Space Preserves in the San Mateo Region. (choose the 12 minutes in full, or a 3-minute summary at this link)
Fact: Waterdog has the highest trail density of any open space area on the peninsula, and probably the bay area. It has twice the trail density of other comparable small open space areas. This fragmentation and intensity of use is not sustainable.

As stewards of our city and our planet we are tasked with adopting sustainable policies. For Waterdog that means fewer trails and a more thoughtful approach to trail planning. For the sake of future residents, please consider this legacy as you guide our new Master Plan.

Feel free to contact me with questions.

Thank you for your service to our City,
Kristin Mercer
2035 Belmont General Plan Conservation Element p.5.3
“Belmont’s extensive open spaces are part of the regional open space network on the San Francisco Peninsula. Notable landmarks in the city include San Juan Hills, Western Hills, Water Dog Lake, and Belmont Creek…. These connected open spaces are valuable because they provide travel corridors for wildlife and increase wildlife population diversity. They also play important roles in stormwater management, ecological functions, and other environmental conservation efforts.

Kristin Mercer
4/30/2021 Hello Park Consultants to Belmont:

I live on close to Waterdog Lake Park and have for a long time been concerned about how bikers are ruining the trails there. In addition, one time when I was walking there, I almost got hit by a biker. The trails are ruined because so many bikers in the Bay Area come to Belmont to bike in the Park; however, people like myself who live near the Park should be given first priority about its uses. I hope that you will stop all bikers from using the trails near the Park.

Thank you for your attention!
Carol
Carol Epstein
5/1/2021 Please review the following new video illustrating Belmonts Waterdog Preserve. waterdogpreserve.org/beauty-destroyed
Regards,
Bill Kurtz
Bill Kurtz
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1061

APPENDIX I
534 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
5/6/2021 Dear PROS Advisory Committee:

Last night at the Park & Rec Commission meeting, I gave e following public comments which I have put into the following email for your information. Thank You for your attention.

San Mateo has over 50 open space preserves including Waterdog which has one of the smallest acreages yet more bike density than 90% of all other San Mateo open spaces. Because Waterdog is the only open space that allows mountain bikers on every single one of our 11 miles of Waterdog trails; both wide and narrow, bikers come from the entire Bay Area to sport speed on our narrow trails.

Mountain bikers have readily admitted that their desire for crowding our narrow hiking trails is because they seek their adrenaline thrills and excitement that comes with speed riding the narrow trails in our Open Space. But the sheer increasing volume from all over the Bay Area for their recreation is overwhelming our environment and damaging the trails to the point that no amount of biker volunteer trail maintenance can now keep up with the ruts, gullies and trenches they create.

Hikers also have a right to their recreation of a quiet walk in the woods and a day of peaceful contemplation of nature listening to the birds and the rustle of the trees. Hikers have a right to a place where they don’t have to worry about bikers screaming up behind them at top speed, slamming on their brakes, shooting gravel everywhere and swerving around them forcing them to step into the poison oak before speeding off again.

Bikers have falsely argued that they have a right to ALL the trails for their recreation in our open space, but that doesn’t give them them the right to damage so many narrow trails in our Waterdog. An equitable plan where both parties can enjoy their form of recreation is to leave the Narrow, quiet winding trails for hikers enjoy and to allow both bikers and hikers to share the Wide trails as originally intended. The thrills of speed biking recreation on narrow trails are best left to the other San Mateo open spaces that are much larger than Waterdog with trails able to naturally recover from such a rigorous sport.

Commissioners, as a long time Belmont resident, I truly feel it will be a shame if an entire generation of children will not have the opportunity to enjoy this natural beauty with quiet nature walks. So I ask you, “Isn’t it more important to preserve the natural beauty of Waterdog for future generations than to cater to thrill sport seekers?”
Jennifer Lien
Belmont
Jennifer Lien
5/13/2021 Dear Commissioners and PROS Advisory Committee, The results of the online survey overwhelmingly point to the conclusion that Open Space is a major concern, reflected not only by the survey responses but also by all the comments. This is despite the fact that the survey is population skewed against seniors over 65 not in the habit of computer responses while staying home during Covid, and despite being biased with questions such as Widen and Improve existing trails which should have been asked separately as Improve is considered an agreeable word.

Nevertheless, where Parks, Athletic facilities and Open Spaces were broken out, survey responses clearly indicated that over 79% reported walking does not feel safe (even if it is only based on the smaller number that responded), over 70% reported biking does not feel safe either and almost 84% agreed that there were safety concerns in Open Spaces. There is a problem with how the Open Space is currently being managed and deterring people from enjoying its beauty due to safety concerns. In addition, over 58% cited Open Space poor conditions and maintenance as a concern. Going forward, Open Spaces need to be treated differently from Parks and needs its own separate studies and I am glad that you have devoted a Focus Group to Open Space.

Non-Belmont bikers heavily influenced the survey from as far away as San Jose, Menlo Park, Palo Alto and their comments readily admit they come to our Open Spaces specifically to mountain bike because NO other local open space allows mountain bikes. Non resident mountain bikers can share our facilities by using the wide trails for their recreation but need to respect the survey results regarding safety, trail conditions, maintenance and environment.

Despite an overwhelming 51% response by non Belmont residents to this survey, I hope and expect that Belmont PROS Advisory members and Park and Rec Commissioners will make policy and management decisions that reflect your public service to Belmont resident taxpayers.

Thank you for your attention
Jennifer Lien
Jennifer Lien
5/13/2021 I would be interested in participating in the Open Space focus group Jonathan Carter DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1062
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 535
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
5/18/2021 Please sign me up. Many thanks. interested in open space focus group Deniz Bolbol 5/18/2021 In order to really understand what the danger of hiking in the Belmont open space is really like I encourage you to review a couple videos. These are of bikers riding the trails in Waterdog. They are taken by the bikers themselves riding the trails. While viewing, place yourself on the trail as a hiker, a narrow single track trail, with one of these guys bearing down on you, or coming around a blind corner. Picture yourself with a young child on the trail while viewing. Also, notice the hikers that are encountered are either forced or expected to get off the trail to allow bikers to pass by them. I personally have had many, many experiences where I had the life scared out of me, and also clipped by passing bikers who just kept on going.

Please also notice how narrow the trails are and the condition of the trails themselves, the rutting, the cut of the trail for thrill riding (they call this trail maintenance), the berms and tight bends, the riding over creeks and tree roots.

Go to your browser and type in: youtube.com, in the search type in Trailkeepers, Water Dog Lake Park”” and watch several of the videos to truly understand my comments. I you have and problems, please feel free to contact me.

Regards,
Bill Kurtz
Bill Kurtz
5/18/2021 I would like to volunteer for the open space focus group. I think I have a unique perspective to offer and I’m looking forward to having productive conversations about the future of the open space.

I also had a question about the survey results- a couple times during the meeting someone brought up a statistic, something like “”77% of people felt unsafe on the trails”” or similar. Someone had also said this was an incorrect/misleading interpretation of the results. Will you be posting the survey results online? I would like to look at them for myself. If you won’t be posting them, could you at least clarify this statistic? Thanks!
Austin Fisher
5/19/2021 Hi,
I’d like to participate in the focus group portion of the PROS Master Plan process. My order of preference would be:

1. Open Space

2. Youth
Scott Sisemore
5/22/2021 I write to you all in my head almost every morning. That is because we wake up to barking dogs at Barrett between 6 and 7 a.m. almost every day. The worst day is Sunday. This is despite our doublepaned windows.

The dog hours have gotten very popular this year. We have noticed a big increase in the number of dogs and noise.

We know we live by a community center, one that has gotten busier every year we’ve lived here.

But with the dog hours, you have taken away the only quiet hours we had - early morning, late evening and Sundays. Easter Sunday, having my elderly parents over for a socially distanced lunch - dogs barking.

Mother’s Day, enjoying our back yard with our kids - dogs barking. Today, we were awakened at 6:05 by a barking dog and while eating breakfast at 7:30, dogs barking frantically at other dogs outside the fence as their owners talked. We know people don’t even notice our houses or realize how sound travels in this little valley. But this is the problem with having a dog park in a neighborhood.

The thought of a permanent dog park at Barrett breaks our hearts. It does not matter that it will be moved a few hundred feet one way or the other (actually closer to us in the latest plan). There are not many of us living next to Barrett so perhaps it is easy to discount us. But we do have to live here 24/7.

As you develop your all parks plan for the city, could you consider putting a permanent dog park on the Sports Complex site or some other site, away from any neighbors, no matter how few? We have been told (repeatedly) to call Belmont Police when we see someone with dogs during off hours or if there is excessive barking. I could call every day. We did for a few days when dog hours opened this year, because people broke the rules every day. The new signs helped a little. Soccer practice helped a lot. But the reality is, I don’t want to call the police department every time there are dogs barking, someone there with dogs at the wrong time, or someone not picking up after their dog. One, this is exhausting. Two, there don’t seem to be any consequences for people breaking the rules. Three, all of us Barrett neighbors occasionally have to call the police for more serious disruptions at Barrett, often late at night. The police dispatcher knows us all. I don’t want to become an annoying presence to the police.

We appreciate you trying to accommodate a wide variety of citizens in Belmont. But, as Barrett neighbors, we really would like some help with this situation. Please advise at your earliest convenience.

Rose Laflin and
Justin Mauck
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1063

APPENDIX I
536 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
5/24/2021 I’d like to see specific information on open space “best practices” and management. I believe it’s very important for the Park Commissioners and Advisory Committee to have scientific studies and research available to review before making any decisions.

So far, the survey has provided only opinions by community members and non residents. Obviously there is a wide disparity of opinions on what is desired.

I strongly suggest that the Commissioners and Advisory Committee receive formal studies available.

Thank you.

Bob Stahl
5/24/2021 Dear Director Shearer, Gates Associates, and Park Commissioners, Last fall I was given an opportunity to present my research on Open Space Trail Density to a few of the Parks Commissioners. Now I respectfully request the opportunity to give this presentation to members of the PROS Advisory Committee, in a study session format.

Responsible land stewardship policies cannot be based on opinion; management of natural habitat is entirely different than management of recreationally developed parks. It requires a foundation in the science of ecology and environmental sustainability. While Belmont is lacking in that foundation, fortunately we are surrounded by open space management districts that do have extensive knowledge and experience. We should be looking to their examples to inform our policies.

I surveyed over 50 preserves and parks from Pacifica to Santa Clara, and identified 44 open space districts comparable to Belmont’s. I then compiled data on area, trail miles, and trail use to compare and contrast their policies. My presentation takes about 20 minutes using PowerPoint via Zoom. Multiple Commissioners and PROS members expressed a desire for more data, and I believe a broader awareness of other regional open spaces and their management policies will be a good starting point and foundation on which to build their study.

I’d be pleased to provide a preview. I look forward to helping our community create a progressive and enduring open space master plan.

Kristin Mercer
5/24/2021 As a Belmont resident for over 47 years, I would like to state my opposition to the continuing destruction of the trails in the Water Dog Lake park area. The evidence is clear when I visit our beloved open space that mountain bikes are the culprit. In addition, mountain bikers seem to have little regard for those who are merely using the trails for walking/hiking. As a city, we need to take a stand against this destruction done by both citizens and visitors. I have seen this abuse first hand and the effects are truly disturbing.

Glenn Morgan
5/31/2021 Dear PROS Advisors,
I’m glad the committee will be expanding focus on the topics of developed parks, seniors and athletic fields. However on the subject of open space, we do not need another “”focus group”” to identify the user’s wants, needs and values - users have been sharing that for over a year. What is needed for Open Space is FACTS and science. The users are not the ones to make policy recommendations - that is the job of this committee. And good policy requires data, not opinion. Please schedule time for factual presentations on conservation best practices, trail standards, natural habitat management and stewardship policies of other open space authorities.

I have submitted a request to present a data analysis of trail policies among all of the other open space districts in the San Mateo region. The powerpoint presentation takes about 20 minutes, and is necessary to your understanding of open space stewardship. Please feel free to contact me if you would like more information.

Kristin Mercer
6/7/2021 Just wanted to ask if you would be interested in getting external help with graphic design? We do all design work like banners, advertisements, photo edits, logos, flyers, etc. for a fixed monthly fee.

We don’t charge for each task. What kind of work do you need on a regular basis? Let me know and I’ll share my portfolio with you.

Eric G
6/7/2021 Hi PROS folks.

I just ran across this article and wanted to share it with this team because I found it really helpful (and challenging!). It provides some important things to consider as we discuss Belmont’s outdoor spaces and recreation programs:
https://www.melaninbasecamp.com/trip-reports/2021/5/20/a-refugees-guide-towards-a-more-inclusiveoutdoors Enjoy! :)
Susan Wright
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1064
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 537
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/7/2021 please keep this area open for bikes. It's accessible and large, there is enough room for all outdoor activities. Please continue to allow bikes!
Ross Levy
6/22/2021 Dear Council Members,
RE: Belmont Creek Stream Restoration Project.

The June 22, 2021 staff report for this project states “The City will cultivate local stewardship of Belmont Creek.”
How does this staff report statement comport with City failure to protect upper Belmont Creek which drains into Waterdog Lake?
A year ago, I reported to your Parks Commission a half-mile long unauthorized trail forged through the sensitive Belmont Creek riparian area. This trail is illegal on many levels, and directly damages the creek and water quality as well as the surrounding habitat. I shared photo evidence of dumping and erosion into the creek, damage to the habitat of endangered species, vandalism of a 100-year-old 50-foot-tall heritage bay tree, removal of endangered plants, and proof that the trail was never approved by the city.

To date the City has taken no steps to stop the eco-vandalism and illegal use of the trail. It is ironic that the City promises to protect and restore Belmont Creek, as the City Council intentionally looks the other way while portions of the Creek are being destroyed.

The Belmont Creek riparian trail is:

Unauthorized and was never approved by any City entity. The Park Director’s 2012 report stated there were “no new trails planned” after the construction of Lake Loop, and none have been approved since then.

Violates the Open Space Master Plan which specifically identified this marsh area for environmental protection,
Violates guidelines of the California Department of Water Resources, in neglect of the City’s contractual commitments of the Notre Dame Waterdog Lake lease and the John Brooks Preserve bequest, Violates Belmont’s own riparian guidelines as published in the Belmont leaflet “Erosion and Sediment Controls for Riparian Areas:
· Do not rake up leaf litter and fallen branches of native plants. This material provides food and shelter for beneficial insects, a crucial part of the food chain. · Do not dump yard wastes or grass clippings into the creek or riparian corridor. They smother existing plants, causing erosion and spreading invasive, nonnative plants. Their decomposition also robs the water of valuable oxygen, affecting fish and other aquatic organisms. · Minimize soil compaction. Control the use of trails and other recreational activities. · Control erosion by protecting areas where flowing water meets bare soil, such as on dirt roads, trails, driveways, earthen drainage ditches, or patches of bare or · Protect existing native vegetation. Construction, compaction, tilling, changes to soil grade or drainage patterns, should not occur under the tree drip-line (from the trunk to the edge of vegetation canopy).

Noted in the biologist report commissioned by Friends of Waterdog, which was sent to all City Council and Parks and Recreation Commissioners:
“Contrary to these policies, the City allowed wet crossings and an unmapped trail to be constructed through the riparian community west of Water Dog Lake. Significant habitat loss occurred during trail construction.

Ongoing use of the trail is causing additional habitat loss and degradation through trail widening, vegetation trampling and removal, and trail spidering, especially in the vicinity of Belmont Creek. The magnitude of impacts to riparian vegetation suggests a lack of environmental review and disregard for state regulations that protect riparian resources.”
The riparian communities of the entirety of Belmont Creek are protected under section 1602 of California Fish and Game Code (Lake and Streambed Alteration Program), and the water bodies themselves are protected under the federal Clean Water Act, the State’s Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, as well as section 1602 of California Fish and Game Code.

Again, I ask the Council to instruct staff to immediately close this illegal trail and begin restoration of the habitat that has been vandalized by its unauthorized construction and use. Especially during this drought, protecting all riparian areas is vital to our preservation of this rare and protected habitat.

Kristin Mercer
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1065

APPENDIX I
538 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/23/2021 Hello Park Commission and PROS Committee Members, When the Master Plan process was getting underway, I compiled a review of all open space preserves in the San Mateo Region to better inform the Commission on the topic of Open Space Stewardship.

Management of natural spaces requires very different objectives and knowledge than management of developed parks. I believe an awareness of stewardship policies and best practices adopted by other open space entities will better inform our own stewardship decisions, helping to ensure Belmont’s natural spaces remain healthy for future generations. A good starting point is this review of all open space areas in the San Mateo region.

I presented this data to members of the Park Commission in October 2020 and June 2021. This PDF is compiled from my original slide presentation. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.

Thank you for your work on behalf of the future of Belmont Parks and Open Space.

Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
7/15/2021 Hi, to whom it concerns,
I’m Xuening, a current resident in [REMOVED], Belmont. I’m petitioning to build a mini park within walking distance. Our daughter Erica was born last August and is eager to learn to walk. As she gains mobility, the need for outdoor spaces for kids to play safely greatly increased.

Most areas in Belmont have a playground within 10 mins walk, however, residences near us are underserved. A park at the top of Oak Knoll Drive could benefit tens/hundreds of residents nearby and I’m looking forward to hearing back.

Best,
Xuening
Xuening Liu
7/22/2021 Hello to the friendly folks in the Belmont Planning Commission! My wife and I and our two kids (ages 3 and 9 months) moved to [REMOVED] in May of this year. One of our neighbors recently mentioned that there was a petition for adding a small park at the top of Oak Knoll Dr. I would like to voice my support for the petition.

Currently, I’ve been alternating between Twin Pines and Beresford Park to reach a playground where my kids can play. The closest park to us seems to be Patricia Wharton Park. While beautiful and wellmaintained, it’s rather small and suitable for only sitting. Having a park with a playground in walking distance for our neighborhood would be great!
Thanks,
Jason Wang
Jason Wang
7/25/2021 Hi all,
I’m a homeowner at [REMOVED] here in Belmont.

Our family (Joe Sexton, age 37; Abbye Sexton, age 38; and Jack Sexton, age 14 months) is excited very excited about the prospect of the mini-park at the top of Oak Knoll Drive. It would be so fun to have a walkable park where our son Jack could play and meet more neighborhood kids! Best,
Joe
Joe Sexton
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1066
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 539
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
8/8/2021 Hello:

We are a family of four living at [REMOVED]. We strongly support the petition from Henry Lin, to build a playground at the top of Oak Knoll. Our children are two and five years old and love going to the playgrounds. Unfortunately, there is no playground within walking distance of our home so we always need to drive to the park, which we do at least once a week. Having a playground on Oak Knoll would add significantly to our quality of life, removing the need to drive and providing some great exercise and fun to the kids instead of playing inside.

Finally, the space is currently unused and seems to us perfectly appropriate for a little playground.

Thank you very much!
Robin, Jennifer, Audrey, and Xavier Raffard
Robin, Jennifer,
Audrey, and
Xavier Raffard
8/11/2021 Hello,
I’m a resident of Belmont at [REMOVED], and I’m writing to request a mini-park in my neighborhood.

My husband and I just moved to Belmont last September, and we are expecting our first child in January.

While we love walking our dog through Patricia Wharton Park, we’d love to have a playground close by where our coming little one will be able to play with neighborhood kids. When we heard about the potential for a mini-park at the top of Oak Knoll Drive (a spot we walk to often), we thought that would be perfect for kids -- the street gets MUCH less traffic than the intersection where Patricia Wharton Park is located and would be much safer.

We treasure the friendliness of our neighbors and would love the opportunity for our future children to make friends at a local park!
Thank you for your consideration.

Best,
Tiffany Shih and Phil Savoie (and our future baby!)
Tiffany Shih
8/20/2021 It has come to my attention that certain members of the Belmont Heights Civic Improvements Association (BHCIA) have been pushing for use limitations and restrictions on the Open Space as part of the Master Plan. I would urge the city council and members of the committee to give an appropriate amount of skepticism to any statements made by Ms. Bobol and Mr. Cuviello. Despite the title of the association, neither they, nor any of the members of the BHCIA, speak for myself regarding this issue. Contrary, to Ms.

Bobol and Mr. Cuviello’s assertions, assertions, as a resident of the Belmont Heights neighborhood and frequenter of the surrounding open space, I do not support any restrictions to the shared use of trails at Waterdog Lake or closure of any trails.

I appreciate the commission’s work on the master plan and as the current Vice Chairman of the San Mateo County Assessment Appeals Board, I understand the dedication and sacrifice it takes to serve in an appointed role. Please feel free to call or email me if I can answer any questions or be of any help.

Clinton Freeman
Clinton Freeman
8/20/2021 Dear City of Belmont Leadership,
Please support the continued access to Water Dog for multi-use activities including mountain biking.

The community (children and adults alike) benefits from access to the outdoors (exercise, experiencing nature, etc.). Please do not allow a small but loud group of individuals dictate how this community resource can be used. Providing “equitable access”, “inclusion”, supporting a “range of interests… and community health and well-being” are all principles of the Master Plan. To deprive access to mountain bikers or even hikers would be at odds with these principles.

I have hiked and ridden through Water Dog hundreds of times and have never experienced an issue. The proposed “solutions” from his minority group are extreme and would be a net negative to the community.

Please support the broader community and the greater good by supporting continued, multi-use access to Water Dog.

Feel free to call me should have you any questions or if it would be helpful for me to share my and my family’s positive experiences with Water Dog.

Thank you.

Jim Miller
Jim Miller
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1067

APPENDIX I
540 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
8/20/2021 I understand that certain members of the Belmont Heights Civic Improvements Association (BHCIA) have been pushing for use limitations and restrictions on the Open Space as part of the Master Plan. Belmont Open Space and Waterdog in particular are outdoor gems of Belmont suitable for multi-use recreation. It is hard to imagine that the wildlife in the park is impacted to a greater degree whether on foot or bicycle. I have ridden nearly 10,000 miles in Waterdog over the past 20years. During this time I have not seen any significant impact to wildlife. While there has been some trail misuse and wear caused by mountain bikes over the years, this is an issue that needs to be remedied through vigilance and education. The current trail maintenance that has been lovingly accomplished makes it even safer and more enjoyable to hike and bike in the park. It is not fair to restrict access to Waterdog due to the misdeeds of a few park users. Thus, as a long time resident of the Belmont and frequent user of the surrounding open space, I do not support any restrictions to the shared use of trails at Waterdog Lake or closure of any trails.

Lawrence Shubert
Lawrence
Shubert
8/22/2021 To whom it may concern:

Via our local NextDoor group, I have seen that members of our neighborhood association, the BHCIA, have been attempting to reduce the number of cross country meets we experience during the fall season.

As a resident of Belmont Heights, I wish to say that the BHCIA does not speak for me in this regard. My family has lived here since 2003, and we live at the corner of Wakefield & Hallmark--kitty-corner from the entrance to the running course. We have absolutely experienced the rise in traffic, along with the buses, during the cross country season.

However, my family really enjoys it. What a wonderful community resource. It’s a beautiful course and I walk there nearly every day. When my son was young, he loved to see all the buses go by. When he got older, he opened a lemonade stand to cater to thirsty runners! I do no worry about the impact on housing prices, or the very minor inconvenience of some increased traffic on a few days a year. The course is meant to be used, and I so appreciate having it. We should continue to encourage our young people to be outside and to exercise.

I do not feel the BHCIA has accurately represented the desire of our community. They have not done outreach and asked people how they feel. I have never seen a community survey about this specific issue.

Please keep the cross country course open for meets, even a few large ones. It’s a treasured resource.

Sincerely,
Cathy Pearl (former BHCIA VP)
Cathy Pearl
9/7/2021 Hi. 30-year ex-professional MTB rider of local trails and I have to say, the e-bikes are really just motorcycles. With 4” wide tires, big suspension, and typically armored pilots. And because they are motordriven, can exceed 50lbs in weight so they tear up the trails.

The bike I ride has 2.2” tires, and must be lightweight so I can pedal it up the hills! E-bikes just don’t seem like bicycles to me, and are causing more harm than good, especially in Waterdog.

I’d hate to see access for normal mtb taken away due to e-bike riding styles. Thanks Tom Sharp
Tom Sharp
9/27/2021 Dear Park and Recreation Committee.

On this coming Thursday, I would hope you would add on to your agenda the Illegal Bike Trail that was constructed in the canyon behind many homes in Belmont Heights. As a homeowner right behind this trail, it is very disturbing to me with talking and dog barking that this brings to our neighborhood, in addition to numerous cars parked on Hallmark.

We bought our home in Belmont Heights because it offered us tranquility and privacy. It appears that the City is now more interested in providing outdoor recreation to all the people of The Bay Area with our cross country track, hiking trail in Water Dog Park, and now an illegal bike tail. What if a biker should injure themself. Will the City be responsible?
It is time for Parks and Recreation to support our Belmont constituents first and not try and placate everyone else in the Bay Area.

Thank You
Ken Lebovitz
Ken Lebovitz
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1068
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 541
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
9/30/2021 Hello PROS Plan team,
I wanted to bring this foundation to your attention:
https://www.saris.com/page/foundation
A grant from this foundation could help with funding for the pump track. There could be other similar foundations to look into as well.

Thanks,
Austin Fisher
Austin Fisher
9/30/2021 Dear Parks and Rec Commissioners:

Unfortunately, I am unable to attend tonight’s meeting. I appreciate the work you are doing to improve Belmont.

We have a big interest in increasing bicycles and pedestrian safety in Belmont. We’d like to increase percentage of students who can bicycle to school safely, have a safe place to leave their bikes, to reduce car traffic, and promote independence in kids, as well as health benefits We are also interested in safe cycling for all community members, Right now I will not ride on Ralston; the area from Alameda heading wesr towards Highway 92 and the bike bridge is too dangerous with cars going 40 mph (and often faster) with no bike lane or protection. If I won’t ride, I don’t expect Ralston Middle School Community to feel safe riding either. With nearly students getting transported in cars, traffic on Ralston is out of control.

Encouraging students to walk or ride to school when we can ensure students safety us critical and would help meet several of your goals including making users feel safe, improving enviormental resiliance and sustainability (reducing traffic), and advancing community health and well-being by increasing physical activity, Ultimately protected bike lanes on Ralston would be ideal, even if it means reducing the median.

Short-term changed should involve reducing the speed limit on Ralston to 25 mph all the time. This would need enforcement and could be facilitated with traffic warming techniques like speed bumps/humps that are being used in other parts of Belmont
9/30/2021 Dear PROS plan committee,
I have spoken at meetings before, so will keep introductions brief. Suffice it to say that I am a well entrenched community member in the city of Belmont, having lived here for close to 20 years with my wife.

We are raising 3 wonderful children who are at this time attending public elementary, middle and high school! Go Wildcats, Rams, and Scotts!! We love our city and we love our parks and open space.

I believe we are working on this PROS plan at just the perfect time! While we do this, we need to zoom out a bit and reflect on the major issue in the room - climate change. I don’t think it would be responsible to look at any project right now, without at least incorporating climate change into the metrics. While it is overwhelming to think about the effects of greenhouse gasses and climate change, we can focus on the here and now. What can we do as a city and as a community to lead and ensure we are going in the right direction?
We need to begin to tackle the sticky business of entrenched car culture. I see parents dropping off kids all over town in cars. Going to the store in cars. Everyone goes everwhere in cars.

This IS entrenched car culture. However, we can make inroads quickly if we support creating safe routes for people to walk and bike to their destinations.

Electric bicycles can flatten the hills - try one out!
Green striping really does inform drivers that bicycles belong on the roads and are expected to be there.

Reducing the speed limits on the streets to 25 MPH would do FANTASTIC things for our overall safety, for drivers, cyclists and walkers alike. Our roads would become quieter and safer. The drivers would lose 4 seconds on their Ralston speed records, and we would gain a happier and safer community.

Improved signage and widening the bike lanes can make a huge difference in inviting potential cyclists to ride rather than drive.

It is great to have wonderful parks around the city, but the parks and schools should be connected by greenways and very safe routes that are tested and marked and established. The connections are as important as the destinations.

This way families can have confidence that their child will safely make it to school, the library or a park on time.

Thaddeus Block
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1069

APPENDIX I
542 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
9/30/2021
(con’t)
Our community will benefit by riding more bicycles - better exercise and more independence from cars.

There is an ebike club starting at Carlmont High School so our high school kids can easily get around town to school and extracurricular activities.

Lets address climate change head on - and make a claim as a city! Lets promote PRO pedestrian and PRO bicycle routes in our PROS plan, and start disrupting the entrenched car culture.

Sincerely,
Thaddeus Block
Thaddeus Block
10/1/2021 Dear Parks and Rec Commissioners:

Unfortunately, I am unable to attend tonight’s meeting but would like to add my thoughts.

Firstly, the work you are doing to improve Belmont is greatly appreciated, especially the attention to the efforts to build community by improving the local parks.

One of my concerns is the safety of pedestrian and bike travel in Belmont for seniors like myself and for the children going to school and accessing those parks. I live in the Cipriani neighborhood and enjoy going to nearby Waterdog Park walking or cycling. I have stopped cycling on the Ralston corridor to Hallmark, Canada Rd and Sawyer Camp trails as I do not feel safe cycling next to cars going 40+ mph on a road with no bike lanes and narrow shoulders. I will put the bike on a car and begin cycling outside Belmont.

Likewise, I do not use my bike to go to Carlmont to shop or have coffee, for the same reason. The congestion during school commute hours is awful, but I believe most parents would not feel safe letting their children cycle or walk to schools as I did at that age. They are missing out on a great experience that includes exercise and building independence as well as the obvious community and environmental benefits we all reap when we use our cars less.

I am aware of Assembly Bill AB43 becoming law and making it feasible for Belmont to regulate the speed on the major arteries to schools and to access parks. I would like to see the speed on roads like Ralston and Alameda de las Pulgas reduced to 25 mph and speed bumps placed by the school zones. I would like to see police enforcement of traffic rules during the school commute hours. I see those things as “baby steps” that would not require much more expensive but greatly needed infrastructure changes such as protected bike lanes on those streets.

Thanks for your efforts and please consider these options.

Sincerely, Arnie Berman
Arnie Berman
10/1/2021 Dear Parks and Rec Commissioners:

I am a long time resident of the Belmont-San Carlos area, a father of three and an experienced cyclist that rides upper Ralston on my bicycle nearly every day. Sadly, I am unable to attend tonight’s meeting but would like to add my thoughts.

First, the work you are doing to improve Belmont is greatly appreciated, especially the attention to the efforts to build community by improving the local parks.

One of my concerns is the safety of pedestrian and bike travel in Belmont, especially for seniors and and for children going to school and accessing those parks. While I bike on upper Ralston daily, this road is extremely dangerous for most cyclists, as cars routinely travel 40+ mph (even 50+) on a road with no bike lanes and narrow shoulders. Additionally, traffic congestion during school commute hours is awful, but I believe most parents would not feel safe letting their children cycle or walk to schools. They are missing out on a great experience that includes exercise and building independence as well as the obvious community and environmental benefits we all reap when we use our cars less.

I am aware of Assembly Bill AB43 becoming law and making it feasible for Belmont to regulate the speed on the major arteries to schools and to access parks. I would like to see the speed on roads like Ralston and Alameda de las Pulgas reduced to 25 mph and speed bumps placed by the school zones. I would like to see police enforcement of traffic rules during the school commute hours. I see those things as “baby steps” that would not require much more expensive but greatly needed infrastructure changes such as protected bike lanes on those streets.

Thanks for your efforts and please consider these options.

Respectfully,
Andrew Hsu
San Carlos Resident (former Belmont resident)
Andrew Hsu
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1070
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 543
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
10/3/2021 Dear PROS Committee and P&R Commission:

I watched the 9/30 PROS Committee meeting on Zoom and wanted to compliment Gates & Associates for their excellent and informative presentation. I’m pleased with the progress on the plan and hope the city can stay on pace to get the plan completed. I also wanted to offer some feedback on some items that were discussed during the meeting.

Hidden Canyon Park
I am glad that developing Hidden Canyon Park is finally on the agenda. As you know, in the 1990s, that parcel of land was dedicated as a city park by the developer of the Hidden Canyon tract under the Quimby Act as a condition of allowing the subdivision to be built. Due to lack of leadership and initiative of prior city councils, that tract of land has been sitting fallow for nearly 30 years. I’m grateful that our city current leadership recognizes the need for this resource to be utilized as it was originally intended. I think a permanent bathroom would be a great addition to that park. Someone mentioned having interpretive/ educational aspects to it, and I think that was a great idea. There could be signs to educate park users about local flora and fauna, trail use courtesy, and trail stewardship. I also agree with the comments at the meeting that because the park is so close to the open space interface, it should be developed with a natural aesthetic to it, and amenities such as metal/plastic playground structures would be out of character with the space.

This past summer, while in Bend, Oregon, I visited Rockridge city park. That park is much larger than Hidden Canyon, it has developed areas such as a large lawn, group picnic areas, a concrete skate park, etc. However, part of the park borders open space, and that portion of the park showcases some really great examples of natural amenities that blend in with the environment. Rather than a synthetic play structure, there is a “forest” of fossilized tree trunks and rocks placed for kids to play on.

There are also beginner and intermediate mountain bike skills courses. These are very short loop trails with both natural and man-made wooden and stone obstacles designed to allow beginning and/or younger riders to hone their bike handling skills in a safe environment before heading onto trails where mistakes have bigger consequences. Both of these amenities would be a perfect fit for Hidden Canyon. There are some photos of the park here: https://www.bendparksandrec.org/park/rockridge-park/ (you can also do a Google Images search for Rockridge Park Bend), and I have also attached a few photos that I took while I was there.

Connectivity
At the meeting there were a number of comments about the importance of having connectivity between parks and amenities. I agree wholeheartedly with those comments. I think the city is doing a great job with the sidewalks along Ralston Avenue and look forward to more improvements to improve pedestrian and cycling connectivity throughout the city. During the meeting when pump tracks were discussed, a public commenter suggested that a pump track location in the main residential area of Belmont would be preferable to the Sports Complex, because that would allow users to safely bike there rather than traversing the hazardous Ralston / El Camino Real route. I agree with that commenter. Also, during this discussion, there was an aerial view of Hidden Canyon Park up on the screen, showing both a trail and road leading to the space, so that site has great connectivity - not only from Carlmont and Hastings Drives, but from Hallmark Drive (via the Lake Road Trail)
Pump Track
I’m very pleased to hear committee members speaking favorably about pump tracks. As you know there is strong grassroots community interest in a pump track, evidenced by the PROS survey results. Yesterday, I attended the Derby and Day in the Park event in Brisbane. They had a modular pump track set up for the event, which was a big hit. I have attached a few photos. I chatted with the gentleman from American Ramp Company (the outfit who supplied the track for the event), he said they build dirt, asphalt, and concrete pump tracks, and built a dirt one at Stafford Lake Park in Novato, and recently built a concrete one in Simi Valley. The portable one at the event is made out of plywood and bolts together, it is intended for temporary use. He said when they build concrete or asphalt ones, they use forms similar to the portable track to pour the asphalt or concrete. He said from a maintenance perspective, they prefer asphalt tracks because they hold up to wear very well, allow bikes, scooters, and skateboards, and surface damage is very easy to repair.

Skate Park
During the meeting, I was also happy to hear the committee members speaking favorably about skate parks, and really pleased to finally see a concrete proposal for a small skate park in the Ralston / Old County Road area. There were some concerns expressed about space limitations for a skate park, and whether it would be too small to be used. There is such a pent-up demand for this type of amenity in Belmont, it will get used no matter the size. Belmont’s preteens and teens are starving for an amenity like this. As in Field of Dreams, if you build it, they will come.

Paul Sheng
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1071

APPENDIX I
544 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
10/3/2021
(con’t)
Coincidentally, while I was at the Brisbane event, I noticed they have a very small skate park right across the street from the event venue, which was being well-used and enjoyed by residents. I have attached a few photos to illustrate how a nice skate park can fit into a small space. During the meeting Brigitte mentioned that this park may be temporary in nature, and that can certainly be done, for example in Daly City has a skate park, which is not the greatest, but has prefabricated metal ramp and boxes rather than poured concrete. A few pictures are here: https://www.westcoastskateparks.com/skateparks/daly-cityskatepark-daly-city-california I’m sure that even if a small, temporary skate park is constructed, that will serve a a successful proof-of-concept, and I hope someday soon the city will construct a permanent skate park for its underserved teens.

Thank you for all the time and effort you have been putting into our PROS Plan, keep up the good work, and I look forward to continued progress.

Sincerely,
Paul Sheng
Paul Sheng
10/3/2021 Hi Kelley,
Thank you so much for this invitation. Unfortunately I did not get this email until it was too late. Is there a way that the communities involved with wanting to give input can send information via email? I’ve heard from a couple people that they would’ve needed more of a heads up. Been able to attend.

Please let me know, I’d like for her to be proper input for this process. Thank you! Ryen Motzek
10/19/2021 Dear Commissioners and PROS Committee,
At the PROS meeting for Hidden Canyon staff got an earful from residents expressing disapproval of development in the neighborhood park. There are three important points to summarize:
“Neighborhood” parks are defined in the General Plan (see below) as intended to serve only the immediate neighborhood, NOT to draw and serve visitors from the wider community. Located in sites where there is limited access and no parking, it is inappropriate to develop neighborhood parks as attractions for anyone who can’t walk a few blocks to get there. Belmont Heights currently struggles with traffic, noise pollution and pedestrian safety issues due to heavy use of the Cross Country Course. This growing conflict is the result of ignoring the General Plan and failing to consider available infrastructure and neighbors when scaling plans.
“Undeveloped” parks were never intended to be filled with amenities. The original plan for these open spaces was exactly at titled -“Undeveloped”. They were intended as natural space for wildlife corridors and shelter for our neighborhood visitors (deer, birds, etc.), as quiet, contemplative natural settings, and breathing space. Humans need to resist the urge to build on every little bit of nature. These spaces are NOT awaiting development, but rather intentionally UN-developed.

The Survey on which the consultants base their suggestions was wildly flawed. Over half of the respondents were NON Belmont residents. Yes, Belmont Parks are open to all visitors; but their intended purpose is to serve residents who live here and pay for them, not to attract and serve those from the wider community.

Belmont’s General Plan provides validity for our argument:

4.2 PARKS AND RECREATION

PARK CLASSIFICATIONS
The City provides its residents with several types of parks and recreation facilities. Parks are defined as land owned, leased, or provided to the City and used for public recreational purposes. In addition, there is joint use planning and operation of school district athletic facilities for public recreation. Parks and recreational facilities are classified as follows:
• Mini Park. A small park ranging from a quarter-acre to 2 acres that is located within a residential area and is intended to provide play areas for small children or passive sitting areas for residents within a quartermile-radius. • Neighborhood Park. A medium-sized park ranging from 2 to 10 acres that provides basic recreational activities for a specific neighborhood within a one-mile radius. • Community Park. A large park ranging from 20 to 50 acres that includes passive and active recreation facilities that serve the entire city or a substantial portion of the city.

Kristin Mercer
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1072
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 545
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
10/19/2021
(con’t)
• School Park. Athletic fields and facilities that operate under joint use agreements between the City and the School District and are used by the community during non-school hours. • Special Facility. A facility such as a community center, athletic complex, aquatic center or other cultural or athletic facility that services a specific recreational need for all or a portion of the city’s population.

This is why I repeatedly plead with staff and planners to really read the existing General Plan, Conservation Element, and Parks Master Plan. These plans are our blueprint. Please respect them.

Thank you ,
Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
11/5/21 Dear City Council, Parks & Rec Commission, and PROS Committee:

I watched the 11/3/21 meeting on Zoom and wanted to offer some input on Hidden Canyon Park. First, I thought Gates & Associates did a great job in presenting the draft parks improvement element of the PROS plan. I think the Parks staff and Gates have done a fantastic job of doing a needs assessment for our parks and recreational opportunities. The needs assessment shows a very clear need for additional parks in Belmont. Ralston Ranch and Hidden Canyon have been identified as two tremendous opportunities to fill our community’s needs - particularly Hidden Canyon which offers the largest opportunity, both in terms of acreage and the proximity to the widest population.

I was unable to make the focus group meeting for Hidden Canyon, but a friend of mine did and I was very disturbed by what he told me. It’s my understanding that nearly 100% of the participants were either homeowners from the Hidden Canyon development, or homeowners / political operatives from Belmont Heights such as Pat Cuvielo, Deniz Bolbol, and Kristen Mercer. There was not a single renter or landlord representative from any of the many nearby apartment buildings that house thousands of renters. If you take a look on Zillow, you can see that the Hidden Canyon housing development consists of 31 single family houses, with market values ranging from $2.2M to $2.7M. These are among the priciest homes in the city, if not the priciest.

As you know, the guiding principles of the PROS plan include the following points, among others:
- Provide equitable access to resources and activities across the entire city - Promote inclusion to people of all backgrounds, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic position, or physical/cognitive ability
- Make all users feel welcome and safe
- Adapt to changing conditions and needs
I’m concerned that the first two principles, equitable access and inclusion, are being steamrolled by elite special interests in this process. During the Parks & Rec Commission meeting, David Braunstein (PROS Committee member and former Belmont Mayor / City Councilman of 8+ years) made strong public comment advocating against any improvement in the Hidden Canyon park. He made an analogy that “just because you can build improvements in something like Yellowstone Park, it doesn’t mean you should do it.” In my opinion this is a false analogy. That analogy would be valid if there was a proposal to build things within the boundaries of the Open Space, but no one is proposing to do that. As you know, Hidden Canyon Park is a parcel of land that is already dedicated to city park use that sits between the Hidden Canyon development and the Waterdog Open Space. In the 1990s, the developer was required to grant that parcel to the city to be used as a park as a condition of the development permit. Specifically, the 1994 City Council resolution approving the Hidden Canyon tract states “. . . The 5.6 acre park area shall be dedicated to the City of Belmont for the provision of a park” and “The proposed park area will consist of a trail head, drinking fountains, and picnic tables to be developed by the City at a later date, subject to approval by the Parks and Recreation Commission.” See https://ecmx.belmont.gov:81/Image/DownloadPdf/133919

It seems to me that Mr. Braunstein, as well as the 30 other households in the wealthy Hidden Canyon neighborhood, have a vested interest in keeping that city park lot barren and unappealing. Apparently they feel improvements would increase traffic on “their” street. I put “their” in quotation marks because Carlmont Drive is of course a public street paid for by taxpayer dollars, which everyone has the right to use.

It would be a tremendous shame to see Hidden Canyon Park - the biggest opportunity we have to add desperately needed park infrastructure - lay fallow for the next 20 years, as it has for the past 27 years.

In the sale and re-sale contract of every home in the in Hidden Canyon tract, there would have been a disclosure that the 5.6 acre lot at the end of Carlmont Drive was designated to be a city park. Over the past 27 years, it appears a sense of entitlement has developed in that neighborhood that they can keep that land fallow for their benefit, which is to the detriment to the entire city. Of course, as adjoining neighbors to the city park land, they are important stakeholders, and the process needs to consider the impact any development will have on them. However, I feel like in the process thus far, their voices are dominating the discussion to the exclusion of almost everyone else.

Paul Sheng
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1073

APPENDIX I
546 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
11/5/2021
(con’t)
Consider this: the undeveloped Hidden Canyon park land is 5.6 acres. That is roughly the same size as Barrett Community center. We have a choice of either providing all 30,000 citizens of our city with 5.6 acres worth of parkland to fill an unmet need for our increasing population, or we can kowtow to interests of 31 of the city’s wealthiest households so they can have marginally fewer cars drive down “their” street. I think everyone is in agreement that development of Hidden Canyon Park should be as congruent with the natural setting as possible. It is not an appropriate place for things such as plastic playground equipment or splash pads. (However, a permanent bathroom would be a welcome addition - it would especially be appreciated by seniors and families with small children.) I really liked Commissioner Michaels’ idea of a staff outpost with outdoor classroom space. That would provide a great launching point for city staff-guided nature walks, fishing clinics, etc. Something like a scaled-down version of the interpretive center/restroom building at Arastadero Preserve in Palo Alto is something that would fit nicely in the space.

I have a question about the process as it pertains to Hidden Canyon Park. Mr. Braunstein is on the PROS Committee, he lives in the Hidden Canyon tract, and he has now gone on public record vigorously opposing any development of Hidden Canyon Park. (Mr. Braunstein has every right to express opinions at public meetings as a private citizen, and I have no issue with him expressing his opinions at the last Parks & Rec Commission meeting.) However, it seems like a conflict of interest for him to participate on the PROS Committee on items relating to Hidden Canyon Park. During Parks and Recreation Commission meetings, Commissioner Mittelstadt recuses himself when items of Commission business come up on trails adjoining his house. However, as a member of the PROS Committee, don’t the same legal or ethical rules require Mr. Braunstein to recuse himself from items of PROS Committee business adjoining his house? I feel the Hidden Canyon Park issue is just one example of a larger issue with the PROS process that City Council and the Parks & Rec Commission needs to address. We need more balance, more equity, and more inclusion. Of course, every citizen on every side of the issue has the right to speak and be heard.

However, the discussion is being dominated by “ghosts of Christmas past” - politicians who have been voted out of office years ago, and would-be politicians who don’t have enough support to get into office.

At each and every meeting, we are hearing from Deniz Bolbol (losing City Council candidate from 2018 election); Pat Cuvielo (losing City Council candidate from 2020 election), Kristen Mercer (former Planning Commissioner appointed by a prior political regime), and now former mayor/councilman Braunstein. It is a loud, constant drumbeat from the same tiny group of people every time. This is the least diverse demographic group I can possibly think of. They are all white, middle-aged to older retired or semi-retired political operatives who own $2.2M+ houses adjoining open space. To be clear, I am not saying these people should be marginalized or excluded from the process; I absolutely respect their First Amendment right to speak. However, they do not have the right to dominate every discussion and dictate how our community uses our land. There should be more balance in the process and more input from a broader and more diverse group of community members. More outreach is needed so regular community member voices can get heard over the roar of former/would be politicians.

Finally, I want to make one thing very clear: I am by no means critical of Parks Director Shearer, Gates & Associates, or their respective staff. I think they are all doing a fantastic job with the PROS plan, and the issues with the process are not due to them, but rather the constant barrage from this group of political operatives who are aggressively trying to dominate the agenda. I have a concrete suggestion to bring some balance to this process, at least as it pertains to Hidden Canyon Park.

There has already been a Hidden Canyon focus group meeting that was well-attended by the Hidden Canyon homeowners and Belmont Heights political operatives. How about conducting a second Hidden Canyon / Carlmont renter focus group? It will take some outreach to get those folks to the table, but it is well worth the effort. It just seems unfair and inequitable for policy decisions to be made on the basis of input from one tiny special interest group.

Thank you for taking the time to read my lengthy email, and I very much appreciate all the time and effort you are all putting into our PROS Plan process.

Regards,
Paul Sheng
Paul Sheng
1/7/2022 "I’m co-President of the Homeview Neighborhood Association. I believe there was mention made last year of some additional work planned/considered for O’Donnell, such as a water-play area of some sort, and/or other improvements/additions to the Park.

Please point me to the specific area in the PROS Plan that I can find detailed information on that.

Thanks!!!!!"
Michael Fabel
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1074
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 547
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
1/9/2022 I just wish to express my desire that the open space at the top of Ralston Ranch which is under concideration for turning it into a Dog Park by the Belmont Parks and Rec. Dept. is very much unwanted! It would create more traffic noise and congestion in that area. It would also be detrimental to the indigenous wildlife which use it as a Crossing area within the San Juan Canyon. The area is also a hill which makes it most unsuitable for such a park. Thank you! Jeanette Sacco-Belli saccobellistudio.com Jeanette SaccoBelli
1/10/2022 Dear Parks Taskforce, I submitted the below letter on October 18th and there was no acknowledgement you received it. I also attended the last comment session and will attend this Wednesday. I ran a survey monkey pulse of our Ralston Ranch Neighbors and there was all but one respondent whose first choice was to keep the park as open space, focusing funds on maintaining and planting more trees over time. The other responded their first choice was a walking path. No one wanted a dog park.

Finally, I would like to underscore the security and trash concerns outlined in my letter regarding the Len Turner Outlook - more often than not, trash is brimming over and posted signs for no drinking alcohol or parking after dusk are totally disregarded. Is this the responsibility of Belmont Police or Parks and Rec? Or perhaps both?
I look forward to an acknowledgement and an answer on what can be done for the Outlook.

Best regards - Wendy
October 18th, 2021
Dear Belmont Parks and Recreation,
Thank you for soliciting feedback on the Open Space Master Plan. We attended an earlier feedback session that was focused on a pump park at Water Dog Lake – these thoughts are specific to Ralston Ranch Park. Or as we lovingly call it after 24-years of living next to it, the Ralston Ranch Woods.

1. We would like to see all or a much larger % of the park left natural (A). Open space is what makes Belmont special and we are sad to see building being permitted in areas that had previously been restricted and the continued loss of wildlife habitat. Ralston Ranch Woods is home to owls, hawks, rabbits, deer and occasional fox, bobcats and mountain lions. We watch deer moving between the canyon on one side of RR to the other everyday (and our Ring cam is full of curious deer families grazing on our front lawn). So much of their open space is already encroached, it’s really a shame to develop RR Woods – be it chopping down existing trees, or building sidewalks, fences and other structures. That said, we do understand that we’re not the only stakeholders in this decision. So, we could support (B) and (C).

2. A play structure for small children (C) would be nice if positioned away from houses - and we already have a few benches (B) so that’s not much of a change and would be a welcome addition for families who live and walk in the neighborhood.

3. Everything else – a dog park that clears trees and puts up fences, picnic tables and young adult gathering area directly on the other side of existing homes sounds awful. (D,E,F) First, dog parks are usually made of dirt (do you know how windy it gets up here?), surrounded by a chain link fence (how unsightly as you enter RRR) – and adding more parked cars at the only exit point for RRR (where we already have daycare drop-off and pick-up) will only add further the congestion.

The clearing of trees also means more erosion. Most homes on the lower part of Ralston Ranch have sump pumps because of the water runoff in the winter that drains down the hill into their backyards – removing existing trees will only increase that problem.

Second, Belmont has a problem managing gathering areas – look at the cars/people at the Len Turner Memorial Vista Point (even after dark) who smoke, leave alcohol bottles and trash spilling over trash bins for the crow to throw around. It’s become a constant parking spot for Uber and Lift drivers, so the area needs more trash and recycling bins, more frequent servicing, and better monitoring by the police.

Ditto for the car park areas at the trail head on Ralston Avenue and 92 intersections.

Third, people already drive to RRR and park along the street to access the trail heads for mountain biking.

I’d prefer to see the city put in a water fountain, trash and recycling cans at the RRR turn-around and service it regularly for all the folks using the 16-miles of trails cut into Belmont’s open space - hikers, dog walkers and mountain bikers.

Wendy Miller
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1075

APPENDIX I
548 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
1/10/2022
(con’t)
Lastly, encouraging the gathering of more people from outside the immediate neighborhood is simply inviting more crime. Robberies have increased in our area and the Belmont Police have acknowledged we are a quick getaway for criminals due to the easy access to 92, 101 and 280. Unintended consequences must be carefully considered – this would affect not only Ralston Ranch, but the other neighborhoods around us as well.

If Homer and I had our druthers, we’d like to see the city expand (A) and just maintain the woods by trimming and clearing brush 2X year for fire safety, leaving all of the 70-plus trees alone. It would keep the space open for wildlife habitat and continue to be a place of solitude and quiet reflection for us humans. I’d like to see Belmont take better care of what we have (maintaining the trees, managing trash left by those already using our open spaces) and addressing issues at the vista point and car park areas.

To add to the conversation, how about planting a grove of redwoods around a natural labyrinth? Some benches for quiet reflection or meditation would be delightful.

If we have to develop the park, we could support B & C if tucked into a quiet space in the park – set away from homes.

Thank you for asking for our input!
Best Regards – Wendy Miller & Homer Wong
Wendy Miller
1/11/2022 Please find my past correspondence to P&R regarding this issue from the previous meeting.

To summarize, the discussion from the previous meeting was well represented by the local nearby community and the overwhelming consensus by the community represented was for keeping the park as natural, open and undeveloped as possible. We support sitting areas and walking paths and potentially a play structure. Here are my concerns in general:

Play Structure - is OK but should be located away from the fence lines of adjacent property owners to assure privacy and security
Dog Park – This is a horrible location for a dog park for many reasons. As a local dog owner, I would prefer to use the easily accessible trails to walk my dogs as do most of the neighborhood. If I need to socialize my dogs at a dog park, Cipriani is already fairly close. If you mean to add a dog park here, Fox MS is a much better location for access, use of space and parking.

Gathering/Picnic Areas – this can be just another attractive nuisance if not policed and maintained properly.

Given our experience with the lookout, there is not much confidence that this will be done properly.

Regardless, it should not be located against the adjacent resident for the aforementioned reasons above.

Maintenance and Additional Trees – The park limits should be extended to back of sidewalk on Ralston Ranch so the park can be maintained properly. This area tends to be the least maintained area. It would be nice to get some screening additional trees along the sidewalk and below where people can peer into the homes from the street above.

As mentioned in my past email, I would strongly recommend that any additional, replacement or mitigation trees be planted along the perimeters of the park especially at Ralston Ave and adjacent to those homes closest to the park to continue to provide both natural visual, privacy and wind + noise barriers.

Regards
Roy + Maria Schnabel
Roy and Maria
Schnabel
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1076
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 549
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
1/11/2022 Dear Commissioners and PROS advisory representatives, Confusion about the designation of Neighborhood Park vs. Community Park, Mini Park, and Open Space has created community conflict.

The 2035 General Plan Parks Element, section 4.2 (attached) differentiates between the classes of parks by size and appropriate use, and clearly Hidden Valley is intended as a “Neighborhood Park”.

4.2 PARK CLASSIFICATIONS
The City provides its residents with several types of parks and recreation facilities. Parks and recreational facilities are classified as follows:
· Mini Park. A small park ranging from a quarter-acre to 2 acres that is located within a residential area and is intended to provide play areas for small children or passive sitting areas for residents within a quarter-mile-radius.
· Neighborhood Park. A medium-sized park ranging from 2 to 10 acres that provides basic recreational activities for a specific neighborhood within a one-mile radius. · Community Park. A large park ranging from 20 to 50 acres that includes passive and active recreation facilities that serve the entire city or a substantial portion of the city.

Gates Associates affirmed this principle in Community Meeting #3 (below); neighborhood parks are to serve an area of 1/8 to 1/4 mile ONLY – not the wider community or region.

Hidden Valley is very clearly a “Neighborhood Park”.

It is only 5 acres – far too small to accommodate community-wide amenities without impacting park space.

It’s located at the end of a long dead-end residential street, with limited infrastructure and constrained emergency access in a high wildfire risk canyon. Traffic and Parking already overburden the entire length of Carlmont Drive (not just the single family homes), and providing parking for greater use would entail paving a large portion of the park.

Social equity is NOT the issue in this case. These General Plan standards are based on resident security, visitor safety, traffic circulation, emergency services, and City infrastructure considerations. Some of the public confuse this park with the adjacent 200 acres of Hidden Canyon. Already this neighborhood is dangerously overtaxed, serving as the gateway access to that open space, which the City promotes regionally. Unwittingly the City has, without consideration for capacity or resident and visitor safety, drawn thousands of visitors from a far wider region than intended by the General Plan.

The Park Master Plan MUST conform to General Plan standards, and your legal obligation is to ensure that conformance.

Please make it clear to staff and consultants as well as the general public, that intensification of use in this tiny park is not their choice; both the General Plan and prudent consideration of public safety and City planning dictate Hidden Valley is NOT a community park, but a neighborhood park.

Kristin Mercer
1/12/2022 Hi Everyone,
I wanted to reach out in support of your vision to maintain the trail system at Waterdog park and beyond as an inclusive trail system open to hikers, bikers, runners & pets.

I live by Sugarloaf mountain with my wife and 2 kids and we visit Waterdog park every week as a family for a hike through the park. My kids love the bridges on the backside of the lake.

My wife and I also visit the park on our mountain bikes and enjoy riding the entire park. It’s wonderful! Big props to the crew that maintains all the trails! Superb job fixing the ruts, clearing the dead trees.

Keep up the awesome work!
Thank you!
Ivan
Ivan Smiljanic
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1077

APPENDIX I
550 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
1/12/2022 Dear PROS plan committee,
As residents of Ralston Ranch Road, we are writing in support of leaving Ralston Ranch Road park as natural as possible and to limit development of the park to perhaps a walking path with some benches and possibly a small children’s play element. Our street abuts the Canyon and the deer use the park to cross from one side of the Canyon to the other side.

Having a dog park that would bring people from outside the neighborhood would increase concerns regarding traffic and safety. Our street is unique in that it is a U shaped street that has two ways to enter, but only one exit. The hairpin turn is narrower than the rest of the street and the family that lives at the bottom of the hairpin does not have a garage and must park their cars on the street. When there are cars going in both directions at the hairpin turn, one must be very careful to avoid the other car as one also navigates around the parked cars. In addition, the sun can be quite blinding at that spot during sunrise and sunset. Even though there is supposedly only one way to exit from our street, visitors and delivery trucks often exit out the wrong way which creates a safety hazard for those coming through the narrow entry of our street off of Christian Drive. Also concerning is the fact that the proposed entry to the dog park is right by the only authorized street exit and that area will become very congested when there are multiple cars parked along both sides of the street while cars both enter and exit.

Another concern about having our park become a destination for people from outside the neighborhood is the increased risk of burglaries. Our street is very close to the freeway and our local neighborhood has had burglaries in the past, and we do not want to potentially further endanger those who live here.

Ralston Ranch Road is incredibly windy and on trash day, the wind often blows the trash, as it is being dumped mid-air, down the street. If we have a picnic area where the trash cans are overflowing like they are at the Len Turner Memorial Vista Point, this will further add to the litter problem we are experiencing.

Having a picnic spot also gives people a chance to loiter after dark which may increase the prospects of safety concerns.

The trees in the park create a windbreak and sound break for the homes on our street since we are right off of busy Ralston Avenue. Limiting development and leaving most of them undisturbed would be our neighborhood’s preference. Our U shaped street slopes down from Ralston Avenue and some of the homes on our street have a sump pump to help with drainage. Removing a number of the trees for development may further exacerbate this drainage issue. In 2018 the trees also helped to prevent a car that went off of Ralston Avenue and into Ralston Ranch Road park from rolling all the way down into the homes adjacent to the bottom of the park. Although it would be nice to have a children’s play element, we worry about an accident like this happening again as people often speed down Ralston Avenue. It would be a tragedy to have people, children, and dogs injured if our park was developed as proposed and became a heavily used park and this kind of roll-over accident occurred once more.

Thank you for considering how the development of Ralston Ranch Road park will impact the wildlife and residents of the neighborhood. We hope the park will be left as natural as possible.

Sincerely,
Kip Leong and Yvonne Ong
Yvonne Ong
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1078
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 551
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
1/13/2022 Dear Park and Rec,
I would like to make sure that the neighborhood thoughts regarding the development of the Ralston Ranch Park are clearly expressed to PROS and the Park and Rec Commission. Based on comments made on the zoom meet, we want to make sure that the park stays as natural as possible to allow for the wildlife to roam through easily to access either side of the canyon around the neighborhood. We also expressed support of making sure this space allows for the local neighborhood, which is defined as a 1 mile radius, to have equitable access to the park. We are in support of having the city develop a sitting area and walking paths through the park, with the additional suggestion of a meditation walking circle. Overall, we aren’t opposed to a simple, small play structure, however we highlighted 1. our neighborhood is windy (one of, if not the windiest neighborhoods in Belmont- not conducive to being outside for extended periods of time) and foggy, 2. the play structure should not be placed up against the fence line of the neighbors properties but on the side of Ralston, 3. neighbors being concerned about trash accumulating and being blown around (as it is not maintained at the vista point), 4. bringing extra traffic into the neighborhood with the bend in the street (blind spot when sun is low in the sky at sunrise/sunset) and the 1-way turn around at the Christian exit, that a lot of outsiders use as an exit. Please consider that this property will require a significant amount of grading and that with erosion/water damage over time it will erode the natural drainage for the trees that are currently in the park. If the city puts in a seating area or a playground away from the residents fence line and closer to ralston avenue, it may need to consider building a retaining wall. A small playground or sitting area may possibly attract teenagers who might drink and smoke and cause a fire. In addition, the city will need to assess the PG&E line that runs along Ralston and goes to the station (at Christian) on Ralston Ranch Road. The line crosses somewhere from Ralston to Ralston Ranch Road. We do strongly oppose a dog park for many of the reasons stated above. Passive development (walking trails, meditation circle, sitting areas) for the Ralston Ranch Park is supported by this community. We appreciate the PROS committee reaching out to the local residents and hope that our opinions in developing the Ralston Ranch Park will be respected as it moves forward in developing our undeveloped parks in Belmont.

Thank you, Carol Rossi
Carol Rossi
1/13/2022 I am Bob Stahl, an advisory member of the Belmont Prosplan.

I want to let you know I’ve been receiving multiple emails from residents of the Ralston Ranch area who are against placing a dog park in the planned park area. They cite the limited street parking, narrow road, and increased traffic in the area from people coming from outside the area. They also believe installing a play structure is not in keeping with the naturalness of the area.

Please take this into consideration in your planning.

Thank you.

Bob Stahl
1/15/2022 Dear Parks & Recreation Commission:

I thought the format for discussing the various parks at the 1/12/22 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting worked out very well, and the meeting was very collaborative, creative, positive, supportive, and productive. I know that emailed comments about parks are being tallied in the PROS plan, so rather than sending a separate email about each park, I will submit all of my input in this one email by highlighting the park name in bold, and ask that Gates & Associates tally these comments separately for each park.

Patricia Wharton Park – I think the draft improvements are great, and I think That Comr. Foehr’s idea of putting in boulders for small kids to climb on is an excellent idea.

Wakefield Park – same as above, a walking path would be great. Again, excellent idea by Comr. Foehr for an observation deck for visitors to take in the view. In looking at Wakefield Park on Google Maps, it has a large barren area. Maybe that would be a place to consider a neighborhood pump track.

Belamdea Park – all the draft improvements look great, and the proposal for a teen outdoor experience is a fantastic idea – our teen population is underserved and there’s not much for teens to do after school. Many end up aimlessly hanging out at Carlmont Shopping Center. A teen outdoor zone at Belameda is very close to Carlmont High and would be an absolutely perfect location for that amenity.

Hidden Canyon Park - I agree wholeheartedly with Comr. Michael’s comments at the prior meeting, and they’re worth quoting here:

Paul Sheng
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1079

APPENDIX I
552 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
1/15/2022
(con’t)
“I also believe a big part of this connection with the community does happen through Hidden Canyon. I think we should have an open space outpost here, offering a natural transition from city to park to open space. We should run staff programs here. Let little kids sample nature here. Offer wildlife education. Invite everyone to learn, respect, and help out. There’s a ton we can do to enhance our open space while not turning the site into a manufactured, high-volume destination. In a smaller way, I think we should replicate this at all our major trailheads.”
I want to make a couple of points in response to public comments made by Deniz Bolbol, Pat Cuvielo, and Kristen Mercer, who were aggressively railing against any improvement to Hidden Canyon Park. They stated that Hidden Canyon is classified as a Neighborhood Park in the Master Plan, which is defined as “A medium-sized park ranging from 2 to 10 acres that provides basic recreational activities for a specific neighborhood within a one-mile radius.” That is correct.

But they went on to argue that because 10 or so Hidden Canyon tract homeowners essentially said “not in my backyard” to any improvement at the Hidden Canyon Focus Group meeting, no improvement should happen there. They also seemed to argue that the Master Plan legally requires Hidden Canyon to only serve the interests of those homeowners. Not so.

First, as the Commission correctly pointed out, Neighborhood Parks are a classification in the Master Plan, not a restriction or mandate on how parks can and should be improved to serve the community.

Second, consider what is actually within a one-mile radius of Hidden Canyon Park: Go to https://www. google.com/maps/place/Hidden+Canyon+Park/@37.5034277,-122.300551,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4 !1s0x808f9f62b039d777:0x84c7f24c0202cd4d!8m2!3d37.5034277!4d-122.2987105?hl=en and right-click your mouse pointer on the red marker for Hidden Canyon Park. A dialog box will come up.

Click on the last item “Measure distance.” Zoom out a bit, and then left-click your mouse on Casa Bona Avenue at Semeria Park. A line will appear, drawing a 1-mile radius to that point from the center of Hidden Canyon Park. If you left-click and hold the mouse pointer on the circle at the end of that line (the one at Semeria Park), you can rotate the line to see what’s within a one-mile radius of Hidden Canyon Park. That one-mile radius encompasses at least a third, if not more, of Belmont’s residential areas. It includes, for example:
-all of the homes, condos, and apartments in the Carlmont neighborhood; -most of the homes in the area behind/between Barrett Community Center and Notre Dame University; -all of the homes and apartments off Ralston near Charles Armstrong School and off Alameda near Carlmont High School (even past the Belmont border, well into the Devonshire area of San Carlos); -a large portion of the Cipriani neighborhood surrounding Semeria Park and Cipriani Elementary; -nearly the entire Belmont Heights neighborhood, from Tahoe/Yosemite Drive, all the residential streets that branch off Hallmark, and well past the San Carlos/Belmont Border at Hallmark and Crestview; So even if one strictly views Hidden Canyon Park’s classification as a “Neighborhood Park” under the Master Plan, then the “neighborhood” it serves -within a one-mile radius – includes portions of nearly every residential neighborhood in the city - and 100% of the Carlmont neighborhood, including all the apartments. (i.e. the highest-density neighborhood in the city.) Thus, under the Master Plan, Hidden Canyon park is intended to provide basic recreational activities for the thousands of people who live within that radius – not just the handful of homeowners in the pink townhouses on Carlmont Drive.

Commissioner Michaels’ vision for improvements to Hidden Canyon to serve as a natural transition to the open space is entirely consistent with the Master Plan, and the overwhelming majority of people in Belmont would like to see this vision come to fruition in the PROS Plan.

Thank you for considering my comments, and thank you for all of the time, effort, and dedication you put into serving on the Commission.
-Paul Sheng
Paul Sheng
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1080
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 553
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
1/29/2022 I want reiterate my request that the Water Dog open space have separate trails for bikers apart from hikers. Just yesterday my wife and I were on the John Brooks trail and two bikers raced past us nearly knocking us off the trail. They came from behind us without warning us and were within inches of us. They said nothing as they passed us. This has happened many times in the past.

The bikes have also ruined many of the trails almost creating highly slick and deep trails. In addition they run over roots they may kill the trees.

My wife and I hike the Rambler, Chaparral and John Brooks trails regularly and see very little wildlife(deer, rabbits, coyotes, snakes) than we have in prior years. I believe bikers have scared off many of these animals.

Please restrict bikers to separate trails in future Water Dog trail plans.

Thank you.

Bob Stahl
Bob Stahl
2/4/2022 First I’d like to thank the Parks & Rec Commission for their dedication and measured approach to figure out how parks can best serve the Belmont community.

After reviewing the proposed plans for Hidden Canyon, it seems clear to me, that developing this property in accordance with the Master Plan will be a wonderful addition to the Belmont community. The plans appear to thoughtfully provide spaces that will serve many needs.

As someone who lives across the street from a neighborhood park, I love the community it provides and the opportunity to share the good fortune of living near an open space. And I’m sure the neighbors living around Hidden Canyon will find it equally rewarding to see others discover this special green space.

I look forward to hearing more about the plans tonight! Thanks for all your work!
Mandy Gibbs
Belmont
Mandy Gibbs
2/4/2022 Dear Belmont Park and Rec Commission,
Regarding Agenda item 6 B.

I want to let you know that I am in favor of the development of Hidden Canyon park. The plans look stunning, and I believe that by developing this space, our community will be able to enjoy this breathtaking area.

Thank you,
Michelle Kelley “
Michelle Kelley
2/7/2022 I want the Park Commissioners and the Consultant reviewing the Open Space to know that the trails are unsafe to hikers and walkers due to bikers. In the last 5 days I’ve nearly been hit twice by bikers speeding around turns that stopped just 3-5 feet from me on the John Brooks trail. They skidded to a stop at the last second when they saw me. There was absolutely no warning to me as the bikers sped around blind curves.

They had no bell or other device to warn me. I was fortunate in both these occurrences as I could have been crashed into by these bikers.

Many of the trails are only 30”-36” wide and cannot accommodate a bike rider and a hiker. I implore you to restrict bikers from riding on any trail that is less than four feet wide.

I must also state many of my friends will no longer walk or hike these trails due the danger posed by the bikers. Many of these Belmont residents have hiked these trails for years but they literally fear for their life on these trails due to the numerous bikers on the trails who sped on the trails making it extremely dangerous. At some point someone is going to be seriously injured. It falls on the biker who undoubtedly will be sued and also the City of Belmont for allowing this unsafe condition to exist.

Thank you.

Pamela Stahl
Pamela Stahl
2/14/2022 Brigitte,
Attached please find a letter and attachments that we would like forwarded to WRA Consulting.

Thanks,
Paul
Paul Sheng
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1081

APPENDIX I
554 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
2/10/2022 As we turn our attention to the plan for Hidden Canyon Park, one great idea has been to add a nature interpretive center along with public restrooms and drinking fountains. An excellent example is the interpretive center down at Arastradero Preserve in Palo Alto. Worth checking out if you haven't been there.

If we do build such a center, I was wondering if we could add a tool shed in the back to store our trail maintenance tools? I have them now stored on the side of my house, which is fine, but at some point Mrs.

Carter might want to have her side yard back. And she's the boss! Also, I think we could raise funds pretty easily to build something if we put our minds to it. A lot of folks would donate.

Warmly,
Jonathan Carter, MD
Lead, Waterdog Trailkeeper Volunteers
Jonathan Carter
2/24/2022 Good morning Brigitte, it was nice talking to you this morning and I’m very happy to hear that further discussion of a dog park at Ralston Ranch Park has been terminated. We are all eager to see what the new plan looks like and if the other points in this petition have also been addressed.

Attached is a scan of our petition, with 97 signatures of residents within the 1-mile radius of Ralston Ranch Park - the area this park is intended to serve.

Thank you for listening and I know we all share a love of Belmont and are trying to find a good compromise.

Warmly - Wendy
Wendy Miller
2/24/2022 Dear Belmont Park and Rec Commissioners,
+2 Noreen and Mike, Homeview’s Co-Presidents, for perspective.

I am excited about many of the additions and upgrades being planned for Belmont’s parks and open spaces.

With that being said, I took a moment to review the current Pros Plan and there is a current change being suggested that I think can be done without disrupting the usage of a key feature of the park for many of our young people.

At present, there is a proposal to replace the half basketball court that sits on the eastern-most portion of O’Donnell park with a water feature which, on the surface (pardon the pun), is a fun idea! But, living near this park, I often observe that the two half court basketball areas are used very often by young people and that the eastern most half court (the one in the Pros Plan) has lower rims that allow for the very young to dribble and shoot baskets - something that clearly provides them with great joy and satisfaction.

To replace those courts, even with something as exhilarating as a water feature, would be a net loss for many of the young people that use O’Donnell Park on a daily basis. Especially since we could still provide the water feature (as proposed by a member of the Parks and Rec Advisory Council) by just relocating it to the fenced in children’s play area in the park a few meters due west of the current plan. Moreover, given the nature of water play with young kids running around the perimeter of water features, it seems to me that locating the water feature behind the existing fence and away from an unprotected intersection (Ralston and Kedith) is an elegant and much safer solution.

Therefore, I would like to officially request that the ProsPlan be amended to relocate the proposed water feature from the east facing basketball court to the gated section of the park.

Please let me know if I can do anything further to follow through with this humble request.

And, thank you for your service to our community.

Submitted respectfully,
Eli Latimerlo
Homeview (2003 - present)
Eli Latimerlo
2/25/2022 I heard that there were funds and initial bids to resurface the tennis courts at the park.

I do not see that on the agenda nor anywhere else on the Belmont website.

Don
Don Pierce
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1082
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 555
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
2/26/2022 I must again state the danger posed by bikers on the Water Dog trails. My wife and I have nearly been hit by bikers three times in the last three weeks by bikers on the John Brooks and Rambler trails. On many of these trails the width is less than 36 inches wide and there is no way for bikers to pass a walker or hiker safely without one party stopping to allow the other to pass.

Each of the last 3 weeks a speeding biker has come within inches of hitting us. Twice they rounded a blind turn in front of us. Neither they nor us saw each other until the last few seconds. The most recent time a biker came speeding up right behind us and veered off the trail to avoid hitting us- fortunately.

In any new plan for Water Dog Open Space, please plan to have separate trails for bikers and hiker/ walkers.

Thank you.

Bob Stahl
Bob Stahl
2/26/2022 Hello, this is Bob Stahl, a member of the Advisory Committee for the Belmont PROS Plan.

I want to bring to your attention requests from several neighbors who have contacted me and raised serious concerns regarding several of the proposals regarding changes or additions to Hallmark Park.

The concerns are as follows:

1.The residents do not want to add any amenities to the upper meadow up the hill from the tennis courts.

Several have told me that they have seen group going up there in the past for parties, creating loud noise late at night. The neighbors also do not want to create an “attraction” or structures to draw more people to the area and possibly leave trash, have parties, create possible wildfires and frankly destroy the natural environment. There are residents living right below the meadow as well whose privacy would be invaded.

2. Residents are concerned about drawing numerous more people to the park which they believe should be a “neighborhood park”. The area is very over crowed on days when the track meets occur and they do not want to see similar situations from major changes that will bring in more people than local neighbors.

3. They do look forward to resurfacing of the tennis courts, adding pickle ball lines and resurfacing the path to get to the tennis courts which is seriously in need of repair.

4. Residents are divided on the idea of a bocce ball court. Several stated they like the idea but they have concerns about the building of it, where it would be placed and how it would be maintained with all the pine trees in the area and the current inability to maintain the parks with the low budget Belmont has for park maintenance. Others bring up the fact that they have a concern about this being an attraction for that would require moving the current tot lot and possible cutting down more trees. Residents also do not want more traffic in the area.

5. Overall, residents feel there are enough amenities already at Hallmark Park and that it would be great to just improve what is there I.e. the tennis courts, play structure, pathway to the tennis courts. Obviously the CSM cross country trail is already there and is enjoyed by many neighborhood residents on a regular basis.

Residents enjoy the natural setting of Hallmark Park with the trees, some wild flowers, occasional deer, birds and rabbits.

Thank you.

Bob Stahl
Bob Stahl
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1083

APPENDIX I
556 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
2/27/2022 To Whom it may concern:

We live at [REMOVED] and have for the past 30 years. We love it here mainly because it is away from the crowds of the peninsula and the bay area. It is quiet and usually there isn’t a lot of traffic. Our children grew up here and now our grandchildren enjoy almost the same serene environment. Although Belmont is hardly the same sleepy town it was back then, this neighborhood has maintained its quaintness. We tolerate the track practices and races that take place every year. We clean up the garbage the visitors leave, we give up our street parking and we are kind and friendly to the crowds. We do this because we understand the uniqueness of the area and honestly don’t mind sharing it. The garbage accumulates and often overflows at the park and it takes the city quite some time to clean it up. The crows and other wildlife rummage around it and create quite a mess. We tolerate that as well. However, we are not prepared to do this on a daily basis.

If the city thinks for a moment that this will not affect our homes with the same issues we deal with when track season arrives, you are mistaken. If you want to update what is currently there, I am all for it. The current play structure is old and the wood is rotten and dangerous. The pathway is a trip hazard because of the tree roots coming through it. We already have a significant amount of people using the park daily for their workouts and tennis games. We don’t need any more traffic. We paid to live here, we pay an association fee to keep the area in good condition. We don’t need any interference from the city. If it’s not broke, don’t fix it.

Sincerely,
Michael and Stephanie Moore
Michael and
Stephanie Moore
2/27/2022 Attn: Park and Rec. Commission
As almost 50 yr residents in Belmont my wife and I are opposed to any additional structural buildings in Hallmark Park.

We moved to Belmont many years ago to enjoy the natural setting and tranquility of the area. To date, this has changed with cross country racing, additional walking paths and illegal bike paths. All this has brought in additional people as well as additional vehicles and Hallmark Drive and adjoining areas have become parking lots as outsiders are using our area creating difficulty to drive and to park in the area that we live in.

Enough is enough already! There are already existing dog parks, playground structures, ball courts etc that are nearby and are hardly used in Belmont and nearby areas.

Belmont does not need anymore of these areas! Let our population enjoy our natural settings of wild life, plants, trees, birds and animals. Why is it necessary to cover every inch of our beautiful Peninsula Area with man made things. Lets enjoy nature.

Thank you
Ken and Bobbie Lebovitz
Ken and Bobbie
Lebovitz
2/27/2022 “Park and Recreation Commissioners,
My wife and I have happily resided at [REMOVED] for more than 43 years. We drive past Hallmark Park multiple times each week. Over those years, my family, I, and many of my neighbors have enjoyed the current setting and facilities in the park. In earlier days my family used the tennis courts. Now, at 81, I play golf weekly, and my wife regularly attends exercise classes. Our daughter and son have their own families in the Bay Area. But new families are regularly locating in Belmont Heights and will likely visit Hallmark Park, as their families grow. I and many of my neighbors are opposed to the commissions plan to expand the park, including new structures. Apparently the commissioners are not familiar with the fact that a bocce ball court requires daily maintenance of the playing surface for the balls to roll true. So, a skilled parks employee would need to tend to that on a daily basis with proper supplemental court surface dressing and leveling tools. We support the proposed maintenance of the existing facilities. But otherwise, please leave well enough alone. We are sure that the commission can find other worthy placed to spend the taxpayers hard earned money!
Respectfully,
Bill Larsen”
Bill Larsen
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1084
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 557
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
2/27/2022 We oppose addition of any man-made structures or surfaces in Hallmark Park.

How have you missed the blaring message that Belmont residents value our natural settings? It’s expressed in the Belmont Vision Statement:
· Our natural surroundings inspire us to play, create, and contemplate. · Our actions today preserve and enhance Belmont’s beauty for future generations. and Conservation Element:
“Human safety and recreation opportunities must be balanced with maintaining the proper functioning of natural systems.” (p.5.3) and your own PROS guiding principles:
· Reflect our commitment to environmental resilience and sustainability · Respect the beauty and importance of our natural resources We moved to Belmont to raise our children in this natural setting. Every school-day they play on a schoolyard – on metal and plastic man-made structures; regulated, sanitized, surrounded by concrete with lines and rules.

Outside school is where they learn about our natural world and Hallmark Park is their classroom. We teach them to understand habitats, ecosystems, and the extraordinary and delicate balance of all inhabitants of our planet. They learn by immersive play; adventuring, inventing games using natural materials and their own imagination. Exploring a deer trail, they learn about feeding habits, shelters, the predator-prey balance. Exploring the meadow, they discover the incredible biodiversity of hundreds of plant species right under their noses.

You have constructed play spaces at every school. But these natural meadows and woods are far more valuable, and rapidly vanishing. Children need natural settings accessible to their neighborhood – not just in distant national parks. We need these natural settings as the classrooms for future generations if we are to change our horrible path of environmental exploitation.

Please leave Hallmark and all of our parks as natural as possible. Repair and maintain what you have.

Replace dead trees with native species. But leave the meadows and woods untouched.

Don’t invest in more man-made structures. Invest in restoring nature and teaching to value our natural world.

Thank you,
Kristin and Frank Mercer
Kristin and Frank
Mercer
2/27/2022 To whom it may concern:

I’m not sure who came up with this idea of building out Hallmark Park with new gaudy structures & artificial walkways, but as a 34 year resident of Hallmark Drive, I protest this plan. I love the natural landscape presently available. I hope you understand that just upgrading & maintaining the tennis courts (with new lines for Pickle Ball), the paths that already exist, removing dead trees & replacing them with native plants & trees will be suffice & much cheaper in the long run. And maybe upgrading the play structure that is already there.

Please: No new man-made structures or paths. Simplify this plan & keep nature on the top of the list! Sincerely,
Michelle Speert
Michelle Speert
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1085

APPENDIX I
558 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
2/27/2022 Hello Belmont’s Parks and Recreation:

I am writing to you now to let you know that as 25-year residents of Belmont Heights, my husband and I have enjoyed many walks in our neighborhood and at Hallmark Park, and consider the park an attraction that makes our neighborhood very special.

I was however, recently informed that you are considering adding to the park manmade structures in the upper meadow, as well as a bocce ball court and playground structures. While I support your efforts to maintain and/or upgrade the park’s paths, tennis courts, and tot lot and to replace non-native plants with native oaks, bays and buckeyes, I do not support the addition of the proposed manmade structures, bocce ball court, and playground structures to the park since those additions will ruin the park’s natural beauty.

I look forward to hearing that the proposed additions will not be allowed.

Thank you for your time.

Carol
Carol Epstein
2/27/2022 Dear Park & Rec,
I write as a resident of Belmont Heights to object to certain of the plans to “improve” Hallmark park. Years ago, in the 1970s, the BHCIA fought for preservation of this open space as a casual, natural park with tennis courts. The tennis courts were a specific wish of the Belmont Heights residents. Have we asked for a bocce ball court in our neighborhood? Have we been surveyed about a bocce court, or any other structural additions for that matter? Yes, the tennis courts, current paved paths, and tot lot have been sadly neglected over the years. We would be grateful for those long overdue upgrades, as well as replacing non-native with native plants. Please seek neighborhood specific input before going any further with plans for structures and paved paths in our “neighborhood park.””
Respectfully,
JoAnn Berridge
JoAnn Berridge
2/27/2022 To Whom It May Concern:

Personally, I think the Hallmark Park should be upgraded but not to the extent to attract more visitors, e.g., making the tot lot like a McDonald playland! Adding the bocce court should be definitely rule out! It will not only make our neighborhood very noisy but also congested with more cars creating parking problems! Our neighborhood has already attracted many bicyclists in the Water Dog area. We don’t want our neighborhood to become tourist attraction but for the enjoyment of us neighbors! Sincerely,
Bessie Ip
Bessie Ip
2/28/2022 Park and Rec,
Absolutely OPPOSED to your plan for new structures. Yes to fixing the current paths, tennis courts.

Ron and JoAnn Berridge
Ron and JoAnn
Berridge
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1086
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 559
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
2/28/2022 Thank you for all the work done on the PROS plan.

The Summary of Feedback is a step in the right direction but it is misleading due to the omission of pertinent data - specifically the number of supporters for various new amenities or sentiments.

Why is this important?
The Commission is given this summary without knowing whether one sentiment is more broadly supported by Belmont residents than another. For example, the Hidden Canyon neighborhood meeting had tremendous neighborhood attendance. The vast majority of residents (approx 10-15) opposed building a bathroom and gave reasons why. Only 2-5 residents supported the building of bathrooms. Yet, reading the Summary of Feedback the Commission would have no idea the tremendous opposition to the bathrooms.

This is because the Summary of Feedback merely states there was neighborhood support and opposition for the toilets -- which makes it sound like it was an evenly contested issue. This is not reflective of the public comments given at the neighborhood meeting.

In an effort of transparency, on the Summary of Feedback, I urge staff to add the number of public comments received supporting each amenity or sentiment (the number can be put in parenthesis next to the sentiment). This will enable the Commission to have all the data when making decisions.

Thank you.

Deniz Bolbol
Deniz Bolbol
2/28/2022 We prefer keeping the Park largely as is.

G& Y Weinstein
G& Y Weinstein
2/28/2022 We are dismayed at the planning for Hallmark Park. We absolutely need open space in our densely packed area of Hallmark homes. I would also be concerned of people coming in from other areas use the new spaces.

Please let our native area along for animals and green areas.

Rosemary Lake
Rosemary Lake
2/28/2022 I want to let you know my thoughts on the proposed plans for Hallmark Park.

1. This is a neighborhood park. The plan should not propose supposed improvements which will draw people driving to the park for events. It seems some of your plans will encourage this.

2. To plan an event space on the upper meadow is not something which should be done. This space is above homes just below the space. Leave it natural. Don’t build an event venue. That is unnecessary and counter to having the space where animals roam.

3. Fix the tennis courts, put in pickle ball lines.

4. Improve the children’s play area. Add another play structure.

5. Keep the entire area as natural as possible.

6. Repair the path leading to the tennis courts.

7. Don’t build a bocce ball court. It’s unnecessary and will require excavation of trees and land.

8. Please- this is a neighborhood park. This should not encourage people to drive from other areas to come here.

Thank you.

Pamela Stahl
Pamela Stahl
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1087

APPENDIX I
560 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
2/28/2022 Planning Commission and Others:

This message is form Bob Beaulieu and Corinne Cho-Beaulieu – we have lived at 2649 Wakefield Drive in Belmont for over 25 years.

We are asking you to please scrape any plans to change/modify Hallmark Park.

We feel it is a beautiful park and nature walk , open to all just the way it is.

In fact it is a real shame (in our opinion) that the city has already cut down so many trees Sometime this are simply beautiful and any intended improvement distracts form that beauty.

I believe this is the case.

Thanks you for listening ,
Bob Beaulieu and Corinne Cho-Beaulieu
Bob Beaulieu
and Corinne ChoBeaulieu
2/28/2022 I live across from Hallmark Park and for the past 40 years frequently visit or walk through it at least a couple times a week. It is a very small facility on a very small plot of land. It has a couple tennis courts which are frequently used by many local neighbors, and a small tot lot which is very seldom used. There is a path to walk around and some benches to sit and take in a view of the Bay Area. The setting is in a grove of trees, which makes it very relaxing.

To try and add anything additional to this area would ruin and trash the tranquility of the setting. There is no room for a Bocce ball court (I do enjoy playing the game) without serious excavation and tree removal.

To which the city just planted 20 new trees. The tot lot is more than sufficient, it is never crowded or frequented by more than one or two mothers/nannies at any given time. I bet I only see someone using it 1 out of 30 times I walk through.

To even think of adding a Dog Park to this small space if ridiculous, there is no viable space to do this. Are you going to add a dog park for 3-4 dogs usage at a time? There is a very small clearing up behind the tennis courts which has a flat area about 30 x 30 yards, one side is fenced for SFPUC property and the rest has severely steep drop offs down to neighbors backyards. People tromping around there would have views into their property and the windows of their homes. If you even think of putting something up there, you better get approval and sign off from those people, as I am sure most don’t know anything about what is going on with this proposal.

Also, the existing tennis courts are in poor condition as is the small paved path that currently exists. It would be great to see them refurbished. The City is not able to maintain the small facility that exists currently, why do you think adding additional facilities would get care and maintenance. Where are the funds and personnel going to come from? Not the City of Belmont. Don’t build more when you can’t maintain what we already have. Keep the natural settings, we don’t need additional man made structures replacing our trees.

Bill and Pat Kurtz
Bill and Pat Kurtz
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1088
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 561
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
2/28/2022 Hello,
Most of you know me pretty well. I wanted to take a few minutes to send you some information when I’m not on the clock and there is a bit less energy flying around.

I do want to say I think the entire commission is doing a great job in general and in working on the PROS plan in particular. I can well imagine how difficult it is at times with the venomous negativity coming from a few but it appears you have been able to weather that and stay focused on a plan that looks to me like it is really coming together in a way that is going to benefit many many people in the community.

This week’s presentation is about community parks so that is what I’m going to talk about here.

I was fortunate to be a commissioner when Semeria and then Davey Glen park were designed and built.

Both parks had many rounds of public input. Davey Glen was such a physical challenge due to being on a hillside that we almost didn’t make it across the finish line. But we did and both of these parks are serving as the quiet but well loved community parks they are supposed to be. Both parks started out with a good deal of very local opposition to any plan to change what was there. Remember what was there in both cases was a dirt lot people had just gotten used to. In the case of Semeria park, a vocal minority wanted the muddy, dirt lot to remain so they could park their work trucks there. Lots of hand wringing about parking and no place to park for residents when the park filled up. None of those fears materialized. Davey Glen had people up in arms at commission meetings talking about all the drug use that would happen with teenagers because its gonna be dark at night in there. None of that happened, in fact there is much more light in there at night and not some hidden drug den.

So you will continue to hear these fears at meetings to discuss the details. SOME are legitimate fears about how their street will change. MOST are illegitimate stories being told because people don’t want others to enjoy what they enjoy. In the case of people who live in the Pink homes at the top of Carlmont, everyone living there knows or should know the only reason those homes got built is because the developers and new buyers agreed to donate land and build a park at the end of the lane. What they don’t seem to realize is that the park is going to create massive improvements for the people living in those homes. Lots of families in those homes have younger kids and thats exactly who tend to use these small parks the most.

So now the city (we) are looking at some new small parks and improvements to existing parks. I strongly feel people trying to propose “Keep everything natural” don’t really want anything changed at all. In my mind, there is no point in putting in a park if it doesn’t attract young residents to play. So incorporating lasting play elements is essential. Once construction of park elements is completed, parks quickly look like they have always been there and the improvements are obvious. I strongly encourage you to go by Semeria and or Davey Glenn a few times over the next weeks as the plan comes together. What I think you will see is the parks are almost never crowded and yet are also almost never empty. These parks attract people in the neighborhood to get out of the house for a few hours. They rarely drive their cars to the park but sometimes do. Many of the park users are kids in strollers with moms or nanny. They grow up using and knowing the park, then they become teenagers and have other interests. That leaves room for the next set of kids in strollers and play age. Its what happens in parks.

So please don’t be afraid to be visionary in your plans. I love the idea of a Gateway to the open space and some of the examples could be copied as is, but why not create something of our own. Permanent and lasting conversation tables like we designed into Semeria and Davey glen provide for people to hang out and for people to have small parties or picnics. Once the initial construction is completed at Hidden Canyon, it will be more difficult to add or change once infrastructure has been installed. I encourage you to think big (well big for Belmont) and think of the people who will use the park. Plan for them not to appease the people who don’t want a park anyway. If that is their only position and the city has decided a park is going in, its time to stop listening to the people who don’t want the park. Listen to the people who will use it.

I know you all have the community in mind or you wouldn’t be spending your time on this commission since it has often been testy lately. But your commission works together WAY better than the commissions I was on and we were able to pull it off. I know you can too. Keep up the good work and I look forward to supporting your continued actions to make Belmont a better place to live for our residents.

Hope that wasn’t too long. I’ll repeat some of it at the meeting. Have a great day.

Kevin Sullivan”
Kevin Sullivan
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1089

APPENDIX I
562 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/1/2022 Greetings!
For almost 35 years, we have resided in our home at the corner of Hallmark and Wakefield Drive – just across the street from the entrance to Hallmark Park. We have enjoyed our neighborhood park and appreciate and support a refresh and repair work for safety concerns and restoration of our wonderful views.

The asphalt pathways are unsafe and in great need of repair due to years of neglect and incursion from tree roots. Over time, our original expansive views from the benches above the tennis court have been obscured by fast growing non native pine trees.

We support restoring the natural landscape by removing all non native trees and increasing maintenance in order to reduce the possible fire danger in our area and restore our views.

We support keeping our natural landscape and wildlife habitat which provides us with access to wildlife viewing and environmental education. Interpretive signage should be added to enhance the learning experience. Walking paths in the meadow area would be helpful.

The current tot lot is suitable only for toddlers and preschoolers. We support enhancing it to meet current standards and provide amenities for our neighborhood elementary school children, while maintaining a look and feel that blends into the park’s natural landscape. We suggest that the playground have a local wildlife and environmental theme to enhance the environmental component of the park.

We do not think we need additional amenities to Hallmark Park when the focus should be on the natural environment, a children’s playground and a tennis court.

We are concerned that adding additional amenities, such as a dog run area, will increase the traffic in our neighborhood, negatively impact the natural setting, and increase city costs for increased upkeep and maintenance.

Sincerely,
Michele Cohen and Lewis Scarpace
Michele Cohen
and Lewis
Scarpace
3/1/2022 To the Commission,
I currently live across the street from Hallmark Park and have lived here for more than 30 years. I do not support making any changes to Hallmark Park.

I feel if the City wants to build a bocce court, a dog run course and picnic tables, more man-made structures that they should look into the other parks in our area that have more space to build upon and add these new improvements.

The Belmont Sports Complex has a gravel parking lot where a large play structure could be added. This would give another area for families to use while they are attending baseball games at the complex.

Younger siblings could play on the new structures while waiting for their brother’s or sister’s games to end.

Added picnic tables and native trees could be planted in the area by the bandstands.

Barrett Community Center should have a fenced in dog run. Since this park is located in the middle of Belmont and is more centralized.

Twin Pines Park could gain more popularity from the addition of Bocce Ball courts and a newly built play structure. People could enjoy playing bocce ball after having spent the day in the park barbecuing. The courts could be built in the shaded areas so it would protect them from the summer heat. They would also be able to hear the music playing from the free music concerts on Sundays while playing bocce ball.

Children could play on newly designed structures in this park.

I feel that Hallmark Park should stay the way it currently is. The cross country course, tennis court and play structures that are currently there do not need to be redeveloped with additional play structures, dog parks, or bocce ball courts. We need to keep this park protected from the wildlife and birds of prey that live there.

This is our responsibility as fellow Belmont citizens to keep the ecological habitat of that area SAFE!!!! This park is for our children and future grandchildren to enjoy. If we add more structures and destroy the ground and fields where the open animals roam, we will be destroying our natural habitat.

Please take my suggestions into consideration. We need to protect and preserve what space we have left in our small town.

Thank you for your time.

Theresa Gotshalk
Theresa Gotshalk
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1090
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 563
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/1/2022 Hello Belmont Parks Commissioners,
I do NOT NOT support any new development at Hallmark Park.

It is already heavily used by Belmont residents and cross country races.

The tennis courts and existing path and playground should be maintained.

The existing vegetation of monterey pines can /should be replaced gradually by native trees.

Whenever I walk there I see TRASH on the ground and in the street gutters by cars parked by people who visit the area already, we do not need more! I pick up trash a lot! Bocce courts and dog park would only invite loud rowdy groups to congregate (also at night when our Police could not easily see from the street) and leave trash. Our residential neighborhood does not need any more that!
Put a dog park and other development at Barrett school where it is more centrally located with parking and not in a residential area.

PLEASE LEAVE HALLMARK PARK AS IT IS!
Make it easy for our Police to patrol.

Sincerely, Lynn Ashby
Lynn Ashby
3/2/2022 Hello,
I am a resident of Belmont Heights on Wakefield Drive since 2013. I am writing to express my concerns about the proposed plan for Hallmark Park. Neighborhoods are defined by certain characteristics, and this plan threatens to undermine and even destroy what makes Belmont Heights special.

This is a quiet neighborhood that already attracts many people who live beyond its borders to enjoy the hiking and biking trails. Moreover, we and all our neighbors already experience the traffic congestion and related issues brought on by the frequent cross country meets. We were aware of the meets when we bought our home. This proposed plan, however, would irrevocably change the character of the neighborhood. When we purchased our home, our son was 4 years old. We knew that going to a playground would necessitate going to Fox School after school hours or driving to local park. However, we were drawn to the area for its quiet and for its easy access to nature as well as the excellent school district. We moved from Sunnyvale, which has numerous wonderful large parks, including one to which we we walked frequently as a family. But those parks have much dedicated parking and some separation from surrounding homes. Those parks have also been part of the landscape for a very long time.

Even at a young age, we took our son down the path to Waterdog lake and he now at 12, enjoys bicycling the paths on his own or with friends.

I am in favor of updating the tennis courts as as well as the tot lot without making it much larger. The path leading to the tennis courts is also in need of serious repair. I think Hallmark Park has no place for a bocce court or wider paved paths. Without additional parking, congestion would increase even further. Note the issues with parking and illegal U-turns and runners darting out into the streets that we already experience during country country meets. During the height of the pandemic when we were sheltering at home, I appreciated more than ever that our sidewalks offered us the opportunity to take walks at various times of the day. I don’t see the need to create additional paths. These additional features also have the potential to attract late night gatherings. I hear from friends in San Mateo this is in issue at their parks.

Please do not destroy what makes this neighborhood special. A neighborhood can’t be all things. We knew when we moved here that we would be unable to walk to errands or to a large park, but the quiet, the extraordinary views, access to nature as well as the surrounding community and schoosl drew us to Belmont and this neighborhood in particular.

Sincerely,
Ines Salazar
Ines Salazar
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1091

APPENDIX I
564 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/2/2022 Hello Belmont Parks Commission,
I DO NOT support the proposed plan to “renovate” the Hallmark Park area.

Currently the tennis courts, children’s play structure, and walking paths are actively used, and enjoyed by Belmont citizens. The existing trees, other vegetation, and the open space should not be replaced with a dog park, additional play structures and bocce ball courts. Available funds should be put toward maintaining the tennis courts, existing vegetation, and walking paths. Older trees should be pruned, and parts of the walking paths have become dangerous trip hazards, and need to be repaired.

Hallmark Park should remain as it is currently designed. Thank you for your consideration.

Richard Ashby
Richard Ashby
3/2/2022 We are 36-year residents of the Belmont Heights residential area. Our draw to this area was the “”natural beauty”” and serenity of the landscape, watershed and preservation of vegetation and wildlife. The walking trails afford residents the rare opportunity to enjoy all of the above.

The proposed plans to broaden, excavate, develop and populate one of the last remaining residential parks into a public community. This proposal will bring more automobiles into the area, and disturb the wildlife and peaceful community our families have enjoyed for years. Preservation of the unique and cherished gifts of nature we may ALL still enjoy without modernizing and injecting new development will destroy what has been preserved for years. We are one with nature here. Noise, cars, trash and disrespecting nature’s gift is unacceptable.

The cross-country runs already bring hundreds of strangers and vehicles to our quiet community every Fall.

Hallmark Park should not become a public recreation area.

We are strongly opposed to the proposed changes to Hallmark Park.

Thank you,
Nace and Bonnie Passantino
Nace and Bonnie
Passantino
3/2/2022 Hi there
I am the resident of [REMOVED] in hallmark. Upgrading the play structure is very helpful for our family and the rest of families that have younger children. We are in favor of resurfacing the tennis court. I also think it is not a bad idea to have some seating area. This can be few benches. Having a looped walking path is a plus. I am not sure i support other ideas. Adding/replacing fountain to drink water is good idea too. The existing fountain was out of service some times back.

Best
Alireza razavi
Alireza razavi
3/3/2022 I just want to thank you all for your efforts and hard work on the Belmont Parks long term plans.

Also, I very much appreciate that you are listening to residents of each community regarding what they consider important to their neighborhood park. As you heard last night and received through email, residents near Hallmark Park want to see the park remain in as natural state as possible, resurface the tennis courts and pathway there and possibly add something for 6-12 year old children. Also, they feel it’s important to leave the upper meadow in its natural state.

Thank you again!
Bob Stahl
Bob Stahl
3/12/2022 Hi Brigitte,
As you and the Parks Commissioners are aware, I have done extensive research and collected lots of authoritative literature about the native habitat and wildlife of Waterdog and Hidden Canyon Open Spaces.

I respectfully request this material be provided to the Open Space consultants for their consideration, and to inform their recommendations.

This is email 1 of 4, coming separately because of the email attachment limitations.

Attached please find the following PDF:

Wildlife Habitat Impacts Waterdog Open Space.pdf
California Tiger Salamander.pdf
Rights of Nature for wcffg-1.pdf
Kristin Mercer
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1092
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 565
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/12/2022
(con’t)
Please confirm receipt and forwarding to the Open Space Consultant.

Thank you
Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
3/12/2022 Hi Brigitte,
I respectfully request this material be provided to the Open Space consultants for their consideration, and to inform their recommendations.

This is email 2 of 4, coming separately because of the email attachment limitations.

Attached please find the following PDF:

Environmental Damage Waterdog.pdf
Waterdog Trails Overdeveloped.pdf
Please confirm receipt and forwarding to the Open Space Consultant.

Thank you,
Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
3/12/2022 Hi Brigitte,
I respectfully request this material be provided to the Open Space consultants for their consideration, and to inform their recommendations.

This is email 3 of 4, coming separately because of the email attachment limitations.

Attached please find the following PDF:

Belmont Creek Riparian Habitat Report CDFW.pdf
estern Hills Hidden Canyon.pdf
Please confirm receipt and forwarding to the Open Space Consultant.

Thank you,
Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
3/12/2022 Hi Brigitte,
I respectfully request this material be provided to the Open Space consultants for their consideration, and to inform their recommendations.

This is email 4 of 4, coming separately because of the email attachment limitations.

Attached please find the following PDF:

Open Space Belmont’s Stepchild.pdf
PR 11072012 Open Space/pdf (staff report)
Stewardship regional.pdf
San Mateo Sugarloaf Management Plan March 2015.pdf
Please confirm receipt and forwarding to the Open Space Consultant.

Thank you,
Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1093

APPENDIX I
566 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/13/2022 Hi Brigitte,
You will remember early in the PROS process I presented the John Brooks history powerpoint to you on Zoom. With the hiring of the City’s Open Space consultants, WRA Environmental Consultants, I believe it is an opportunity to educate and inform them of important impacts and topics regarding Waterdog.

I have attached the John Brooks presentation in PDF printable format for their consideration and trust you will forward it to them.

In addition, under separate emails, I have sent 2 additional PDF printable format presentations on “”City Policies Ignored”” (Past) and “”Sport of Mountain Biking”” plus related “”Media Reports”” which should also be of interest to the Consultants and PROS Committee.

Thank you for your attention. Let me know if you have any questions.

Let’s treasure our Waterdog Open Space!
Jennifer
Jennifer Lien
3/13/2022 Hi Brigitte,
Attached please find my final printable PDF sent to you for the WRA Environmental Consultants to inform and educate them of the cumulative detrimental impacts to Waterdog trails, wildlife and habitat as well as endangerment of safety of hikers on narrow single-use trails.

Also attached are several media reports that may be of interest to all on this topic.

Thank you for your attention. Let me know if you have further questions.

Let’s preserve our Waterdog for generations to come!
Jennifer
Jennifer Lien
3/13/2022 To Whom It May Concern,
A warm thank you to the Parks and Rec Commissioners and Director for responding to our neighborhood’s request not to have a dog park at Ralston Ranch Park. A neighbor shared the diagram of the proposed revised plans with me for the park which does not include the dog park.

The plans do show picnic tables and a multi-purpose flexible space that says add seating space. Can you please elaborate as to the plans for the multi-purpose space and let us know how many picnic tables are planned? Our neighborhood does not want amenities that encourage loitering after dark which may increase the prospect of safety concerns.

Also, Ralston Ranch Road can be incredibly windy and on trash day, the wind often blows the trash, as it is being dumped mid-air, down the street. If we have a picnic area where the trash cans are overflowing like they are at the Len Turner Memorial Vista Point, this will further add to the litter problem we are experiencing.

Thank you,
Yvonne Ong
Yvonne Ong
3/17/2022 Hi Brigitte,
I was pleased to hear a consultant firm has been hired to provide an environmental evaluation of Waterdog.

If I may, I’d like to submit this reduced summary of my Strava data review of biking activity done last year that I hope can be of value to the consultants. Instead the long Powerpoint, I condensed it down to some ride data on major trails, and a couple speed charts.

Thanks, good luck with the process, and let me know if I can be of further help.

Regards,
Ed Mitchell
Ed Mitchell
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1094
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 567
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/19/2022 Dear Commissioners,
Thank you for the information that was provided last week on the status of parks in Belmont. I was interested in hearing about all the parks but my major concern is Hallmark Park since I live in close proximity to it. I was pleased to hear that most commissioners were not in favor of expanding the park. I walk through it frequently on my way to walking the cross country course. The tot lot is used infrequently and really does not need to be upgraded for older children. It is now a facility that is not used often and I do not think that the addition of modern equipment will increase its use. The tennis courts are though and need to be renovated as well as the sidewalks. I was also concerned about adding a bocce ball court or creating a facility on the hill. If a bocce ball court is added, you need to address ADA requirements and this area is not easily accessible. The area on the hill looks down into people’s homes and impacts personal space. In addition, we may be the only park in Belmont that does not have at least one designated parking space. The only parking is on the street. Street parking can be busy with individuals parking to access the cross county course. I hope that you will continue to support no additional structures and facilities to Hallmark park. It is a beautiful wild life preserve and should be maintained as such.

I have also walked in the Hidden Valley area. I agree that safe paths need to be maintained for bikers and walkers. Bikers often come down quickly off the canyon path and can potentially be dangerous to people sitting or walking in the area. I agree that signage about the wildlife would be educational but it needs to be maintained. Weathering takes a quick toll on signage so that it becomes eyesore if not maintained.

Finally, I was very concerned that comments were made by commissioners that they had not visited some of the parks. How can one vote on changes to a park if they have not seen it? As an educational administrator, I attended board meetings twice a month for over 20 years. I recognize and appreciate the time that a commissioner volunteers to support a program. But I also know that accepting to be a commissioner comes with a responsibility to understand what one is reviewing and voting on. I suggest a field trip to the parks. I frequently watched such activities by board members to visit construction projects in my school district. It provided them with a better lens to make decisions. I encourage all commissioners to visit the Belmont parks so that they can be informed about their needs.

Thanks you for hearing my concerns.

Dr. Patricia Kurtz
Patricia Kurtz
3/21/2022 Hi,
While I appreciate the efforts to resurface the tennis courts and add pickleball (both of which are definitely needed), I have a number of concerns (and suggestions) below:

Concerns:

I was disappointed to see that there was no new tennis courts added in the plan, despite the benchmarks showing that we are definitely below the surrounding areas and the “”ideal”” number suggests adding at least 2 courts. Currently the courts at Alexander park are always full and despite living near the park, I often have to go to other courts in neighboring cities to find an open court to play.

While pickleball would be a welcome add to the city, I think adding them to the existing tennis courts would exacerbate the supply/demand issue, as it would create further competition for an already scarce resource (pickleball and tennis players competing for the same courts, which are already in high demand).

Furthermore, playing tennis next to pickleball is less than ideal, especially since there’s no dividing fencing between the courts.

While resurfacing the courts, are in definite need, I worry the money spent to do so will not be optimized due to people using the courts for non-tennis activities (in Alexander Park at least). I think due to the proximity to the playground, often times kids will use the courts to ride bikes/scooters etc. Also, Alexander Park has become a de facto dog park, and dogs will often go into the courts, especially if the field is wet (I’ve found dog poop left on the courts).

Suggestions:

Please consider adding more dedicated tennis courts to the city. Perhaps at the open space next to the Belmont Sports Center? I think adding something like 4 or 5 courts in a single location would help address the supply issue.

I would strongly suggest having dedicated pickleball courts rather than combining tennis and pickleball onto a single court. Again, seems like there’s some open space next to the Belmont Sports Center to have both as separate amenities, but anywhere really would be great.

To help preserve the newly resurfacing of courts at Alexander Park would suggest:

Adding a seperate skate park somewhere nearby so that kids can have a place to ride their skateboards/ scooters rather than on the tennis courts
William Wong
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1095

APPENDIX I
568 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
3/21/2022
(con’t)
Adding a dog park in Sterling Downs to give dogs a safe and dedicated area to exercise so that Alexander Park (and the church parking lot) is no longer used as a dog park Could replace the gates to the tennis courts with the subway style gate to make it more difficult to bring non-tennis equipment into the courts
Lastly, to enhance the tennis courts would suggest:

Adding wind nets... this is definitely needed as it gets pretty windy there adding fencing to divide the courts (to keep balls from rolling onto the neighboring court) Adding lights to extend the hours for which people could use the courts Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback
William Wong
William Wong
4/1/2022 We am looking forward to next week’s PROS Advisory Committee meeting and want to reiterate my support for keeping Water Dog OS open for all: dog walkers, hikers, mountain bikers,etc. As avid naturalists, hikers, birders, and mountain bikers who have been using the trails at Water Dog for all of these activities for over 10 years, we believe Water Dog should continue to allow all of them. While we are aware there are a few very vocal activists who feel Mountain biking should be banned from most of the OS their arguments for doing so are flawed and over exaggerated. Animals and people are not being harmed by mountain biking. Actually it is the mountain bikers who make the trails safe and sustainable, if not for those of us putting in many hours of hard work every year, the trails would be in much worse shape.

We are also very excited by all the improvements suggested for the parks in Belmont such as additional play structures, a place for teens, improved walking trails, a pump track and skate park, exercise space and a pool as well as keeping some spaces natural. It is clear that a lot of work has been done to meet the very diverse needs of the community. Thank you for all your hard work.

Karen and John Moody
Karen and John
Moody
4/1/2022 I have been to the Parks website and looked at plans. I still do not see any updates on when theTennis courts will be resurfaced.

Don Pierce
4/1/2022 I am a resident of San Mateo who has been very fortunate to use the Waterdog Open Space for 22 years. My wife and two boys also use this valuable community open space. I absolutely support keeping Waterdog Open Space an accessible and sustainable place for recreation, connecting with nature and building community. In the new Master Plan, I request you to consider:

Maintaining the trails, as they are, for multi-use for hiking, biking, dog walking, exercise, connecting with nature, etc., consistent with best practices of other open spaces Continuing outreach and education to trail users and groups to ensure safe and sustainable use of our trails.

Continuing to collaborate with community groups and volunteers to support the maintenance and preservation of the trails. They are doing a great job along with Belmont P&R workers. Our trails get healthier every year.

Open space recreation carries enormous benefits for the folks that live in Belmont and residents of surrounding cities, such as San Mateo - a local park for stress reduction, exercise, revitalization, appreciation of nature, cultivating conservationist and environmentalist ideals, fostering community pride, and improvement of quality of life. Our community has a need for recreational open space - Water dog has served this public need well for decades.

Sincerely,
Simon North
Simon North
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1096
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 569
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/1/2022 This month, the commission will be discussing Belmont’s open space as part of the overall PROS plan. At some point, we need to discuss what our Waterdog trail map should be in the future? Are there redundant trails to remove? Are there additional trails that would add to the experience of the open space? I wanted to humbly suggest the following “”Future Waterdog Trail Map”” as a starting point for discussion of the open space. The green lines are existing trails. The blue line is a proposed new trail. The red lines are existing trails that I propose to remove. You can view this on Google Maps and play around with it by going to this link:
https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1iai29RPBIJMR8QFS0L1xM1fBmbOpa8i&ll=37.505045261891965%2C-122.30845913638426&z=16 Here are the ideas:

1. Create a Belmont Creek Trail below the dam that follows the isocontour shown in blue. This would be good for a few reasons. First, it would allow folks to get from the Lyall Road entrance (bottom of Lake Road) to Hidden Canyon without having to climb out of the whole canyon. Second, it bypasses Carlmont Drive so one doesn’t have to drive/cycle/bike along the houses on Carlmont Drive, improving their privacy.

Third, it would allow us to clean up Belmont Creek below the dam (as suggested by our former director Jonathan Gervais). Fourth, it would spread out users more and decrease trail user density. Finally, it would complete a perimeter trail and allow many more permutations of loops for recreationalists to use.

2. Remove the Elevator redundant fall-line trail (red). This is a fall line trail and redundant with Elevator. It doesn’t add anything to the park and is basically impossible to maintain.

3. Remove French Trail (red). This runs parallel to Ohlone. Although some like it and would like to see it preserved, creation of a Belmont Creek Trail (blue) would likely be an acceptable compromise to these users.

Thank you for your continued support of our multi-use trail system at Waterdog.

Jonathan Carter, MD
Leader, Waterdog Trailkeepers Volunteers
Jonathan Carter
4/2/2022 Dear Sir/Madam,
I regularly ride my mountain bike in Waterdog with friends and I am concerned about efforts to close it off to mountain bikers. My experience riding in Waterdog has always been positive and interactions with other users are always courteous and friendly. We are respectful of others and they always return the favor in kind. I trust that every effort will be made to keep the park opened to all users including cyclists.

Thank you,
Pierre Tremblay
Pierre Tremblay
4/4/2022 To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing to express my support for continued bicycle access to Waterdog Lake Open Space. The community of bicyclists that frequent Waterdog–many of whom visit from surrounding areas–contribute both to the park and to the local community by:

Volunteering their time to build and maintain the trails in the Waterdog OS.

Patronizing local businesses, including: restaurants, bike shops, grocery stores, and gas stations.

Not only does Waterdog serve as a fantastic outdoor recreation spot for Belmont residents; it also draws-in cyclists from other communities around the peninsula who enjoy riding the trails as well. Waterdog is the cycling destination I visit the most, and I often will drop-in to a local restaurant for food and drinks after a ride with friends.

Denying cyclists access to Waterdog would hurt the trails as well as local businesses.

Sincerely,
Eric Csongradi
Eric Csongradi
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1097

APPENDIX I
570 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/4/2022 Hello Belmont P&R Commission,
I would like to voice my enthusiastic support and gratitude for continued mountain bike access to Waterdog Park, especially as you finalize the PROS Master Plan.

Off-road cycling has been an ideal means to safely get my children off the couch and into the outdoors, while safely avoiding cars and traffic. Having access to mountain biking in a suburban setting on the Peninsula is a tremendous boon to the mid-Peninsula public, notably in San Mateo County as the county park system has largely marginalized the burgeoning cycling community.

Belmont’s leadership in providing equitable, thoughtful facilities to all user groups is a beacon on the Peninsula. I personally live in Portola Valley, where I also manage the town trail map and thus receive vocal input from many shockingly hostile user groups. The fortitude the commission has regularly shown in seeking openness and community throughout this process has been profoundly refreshing. Similarly the openness and good vibes my children and I have consistently experienced on Waterdog trails, from a diverse body of users, are a local treasure to be maintained.

It is my sincere hope that trail access can be maintained for all, and that we can learn to embrace mutual community in the outdoors, rather than to seek the exclusion and division that some vocal minorities have been pushing for. May we all continue to safely have fun on trails together. I think the charter says it best!

4.4-4 Maintain and enhance trails in open spaces in Belmont. Continue to support opportunities for shared use of trails among multiple users, including pedestrians and mountain bicyclists. Promote knowledge, trail etiquette, and consideration of multiple users on trails through education programs and signage.

Thank you for your consideration, and my best regards,
Dave
Dave Evans
4/4/2022 I’m quite upset that we can’t all get along and tolerate each other! I’m 64 years old and love to mountain bike or walk my dog at Waterdog. It’s a great place and I have access from my house without getting into the car. I thought our son to mountain bike there and he had so much fun riding there with his friends. That is a great alternative to screen time.

All the people that I have met on rides and walks are super friendly and respectful of each other.

During COVID, it was almost the only outdoor park where one could go to and enjoy some exercise and nature. During the stressful times it was a sanctuary. My son had a routine to bike for 45 minutes in a free period in High school. It kept him in shape with no PT and only Zoom school.

I hope for kinder people, that respect everybody and can enjoy Waterdog together as a community. Please keep Waterdog accessible for everybody.

Sincerely
Lotti Dunbar
Lotti Dunbar
4/4/2022 I am writing as a long-time (30+ years) Belmont resident to urge you to keep open space access open to all. Waterdog Open Space is the crown jewel of the Belmont Park and Recreation system and as such, we need to maintain inclusive access for all to enjoy.

There is a small group of vocal citizens who want to restrict activities in the open space, but I do not believe their views reflect those of the wider community. The survey results support this view.

Occasionally, I hear an anecdote about a “scary encounter” between mountain bikers and other trail users.

I don’t believe these are very common though we do need to work to make sure all users of the trails respect each other and share the trails responsibly.

I do have an anecdote of my own to share. This past summer, I was riding in Waterdog and saw a number of people with dogs. I decided to count how many were leashed. On the Lake Road 3 dogs of 4 were on leashes -- good. On the other trails in the Open Space, I saw 8 dogs, none of which were leashed. Does this mean we should restrict dogs in the Open Space? Of course not! It means that trail users need to be educated, respectful to others on the trail.

Thank you for your service to our community,
Michael Munrow
Michael Munrow
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1098
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 571
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/4/2022 Hello,
I am a 62 year-old retiree and wish to express my support for continued multi-use access to Waterdog Park.

A former runner, I am now a cyclist (due to bi-lateral hip replacements) who appreciates the mountain bike trails the park provides.

I also ride in many State, Santa Clara County and Mid-Pen Open Space parks and feel a multi-use approach has worked well over the years.

Thank you.

Andy Lott
Sunnyvale, CA
Andy Lott
4/4/2022 Hello,
My name is Jason Stewart. I am a mountain biker who frequents the trails at Waterdog lake. I first started riding there when I was a Carlmont high student back in the early 2000s. Waterdog is one of the few places that is close enough for those of us who live on the Peninsula to get a ride in after work or fit a quick ride in on a busy weekend. From my house on the San Carlos and Redwood City border, it is only a 15-minute drive to get to Waterdog. In order to get to similar trails in other open spaces, I would have to drive twice that distance if not further if Waterdog was closed to bicycles.

We as mountain bikers do not have as many options to get out and exercise as hikers do. Please do not limit us further.

Thanks,
Jason Stewart
Jason Stewart
4/5/2022 I live just across Ralston from Waterdog, and wanted to drop a note that I’m in support of keeping Waterdog open to all recreational activities, including mountain biking. I’ve attended some of the City Council meetings and watched the PROS plan with interest. The handful of persistent local NIMBYs in Belmont Heights frequently dominate the meetings with their agenda of exclusion, but I hope the council sees through the fact that, although loud, these people are in quite a minority in the community, including their own neighborhood.

I’ve heard about people “almost” getting all kinds of dramatic injuries, but haven’t heard of any data about actual incidents. As a frequent user of the open space, I’m deeply skeptical that there is actually a problem here, and it sounds to me instead like people stirring fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

Our trail system benefits from the trail maintenance the mountain bike groups donate, and I hope we keep Waterdog open to all. In the new Master Plan, I request you to consider:

Maintaining the trails, as they are, for multi-use for hiking, biking, dog walking, exercise, connecting with nature, etc., consistent with best practices of other open spaces Continuing outreach and education to trail users and groups to ensure safe and sustainable use of our trails.

Continuing to collaborate with community groups and volunteers to support the maintenance and preservation of the trails. They are doing a great job along with Belmont P&R workers. Our trails get healthier every year.

Thanks,
Scott Hill
Cipriani
Scott Hill
4/5/2022 Hello,
As a resident of Belmont for the past 6 years, I want to voice my support for keeping Waterdog Open Space an accessible and sustainable place for recreation, connecting with nature and building community.

In the new Master Plan, I request you to consider:
* Maintaining the trails, as they are, for multi-use for hiking, biking, dog walking, exercise, connecting with nature, etc., consistent with best practices of other open spaces * Continuing outreach and education to trail users and groups to ensure safe and sustainable use of our trails.

Sam Chao
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1099

APPENDIX I
572 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/5/2022
(con’t)
* Continuing to collaborate with community groups and volunteers to support the maintenance and preservation of the trails. They are doing a great job along with Belmont P&R workers. Our trails get healthier every year.

Open space recreation carries enormous benefits for the folks that live in Belmont - a local park for stress reduction, exercise, revitalization, appreciation of nature, cultivating conservationist and environmentalist ideals, fostering community pride, and improvement of quality of life. Our community has a need for recreational open space - Waterdog has served this public need well for decades.

Thank you,
Sam Chao
Sam Chao
4/6/2022 Hi Belmont staffs,
I want to write to let you know about how awesome the trail access for mountain biker has been at waterdog lake.

I commute from southbay to SF regularly, and always make a stop midway at Belmont’s Waterdog Lake mid drive to get a morning workout in. It reduces my commute in half with this midpoint stop, and I am more energized for the workday afterword.

Without this great and convenient access, I wouldn’t normally stop in Belmont. Please continue to keep up the great access you offer to mountain biker like myself.

Thank you
Jacob Kwan
Jacob Kwan
4/6/2022 Please continue to allow multi use trail access at waterdog. Everyone has been getting along for decades there. please don't let a couple vocal neighbors determine the outcome and use of a park used by thousands.

Bob Estes
4/6/2022 I would like to tell you of my support keep Waterdog a multi-use trail system. It is a friendly place, close to home, to get outside for exercise whether on bikes or hiking with the dog. We frequently go out to eat or get food at Lunardi.

I’d also like to remind you that many of the trails were built and are maintained by our mountain biking community.

Sincerely,
Judy Silverman
Judy Silverman
4/6/2022 Please maintain mountain bike access to Waterdog park. It is the only park that allows mountain biking that is easily accessible and nearby the local cities. Many of the trails in the park were built and continue to be maintained by mountain bikers. I have participated in both of these activities. I feel it is so unfortunate that a small group of citizens want to restrict access to this park. Please keep the park open to multi-user access.

Thank You,
Erik Cords
Erik Cords
4/7/2022 Dear Parks and Rec Commission,
Thank you for always-thoughtful consideration of the issues, and I’m sorry that you have to endure so much abuse from the group of anti-recreation partisans who seek to close off access to our open space. I’m sure this is not what you had in mind when you volunteered to serve on the Commission, and I admire your patience.

The anger in the voices of these public commenters was palpable. Perhaps they are frustrated that their narrative of environmental destruction by multi-use is simply without factual basis, and they are now resorting to name-calling and lashing out at the Commission itself. Generally, when a party to a debate resorts to name-calling and ad hominem attacks, that means they are unable to provide facts, evidence, reason, or logic to support their position. Attacking commenters who disagree with them as “ignorant” without providing any factual explanation of why the opposing party’s position is somehow wrong does not add anything productive to the discussion.

I wanted to make the below points during the meeting, but refrained since the meeting dragged on very late. I am writing mainly to correct some of the misinformation that came out in these public comments.

First, it is unclear why it is “ignorant” to point out that one mile away from Waterdog open space, there is a 23,000 acre wildlife preserve at the SFPUC Peninsula Watershed which is a state-designated fish and game refuge, and a protected area within the UNESCO Golden Gate Biosphere Reserve.

Paul Sheng
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1100
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 573
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/7/2022
(con’t)
While Waterdog can and should contribute to biodiversity, there is only so much it can do, given that it is 100% encircled by urban development and has a dam and a substantial amount of concrete storm drain infrastructure constructed within it to service those developments.

WRA’s preliminary analysis shows that anecdotal tales of environmental destruction are without foundation.

Apex predators such as bobcat and mountain lion sightings at Waterdog are commonplace. When a habitat is in decline, the first animals to leave are apex predators. The presence of these apex predators demonstrate that Waterdog remains a healthy ecosystem.

In his comments, Mr. Cuvielo lashed out at the cycling community for creating shortcuts and illegal trails.

With regard to shortcuts, those are not a cycling-specific phenomenon. Unauthorized shortcuts are a problem in every trail system, whether or not they are multi-use. Hikers, runners, dog walkers, equestrians, and cyclists can all create them.

What is unique about Waterdog is that volunteers from cycling community actively and successfully remove shortcuts on an ongoing basis. For example, on John Brooks trail, the hill behind Highlands Court became barren with trail braids, which can be seen in this Google Maps photo:
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.5051375,-122.3052449,216m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en Those trail braids worsened substantially during the Covid lockdown induced increase in trail use.

Volunteers from the Waterdog have completely closed off and restored the trail braids, and re-vegetated that hill with soil and plant material from the concrete drainage culverts that were clogged. If you look at that hill now, the trail braids in the Google Maps photo are no longer visible.

On the other side of John Brooks in that same area, a social shortcut trail developed between John Brooks and Chaparral. The Trailkeepers completely brushed over and closed the entrance to that shortcut, and it is no longer usable. The formerly barren area at Rambler near the origin of Finch is in the process of being restored by the Trailkeepers. All trail braids have been closed, and it is being restored with plantings of native species, including six new California Oak seedlings which are taking root. A steep shortcut from that area to Elevator was also closed off by the Trailkeepers. A major shortcut on Chaparral near Berry trail was completely closed off. The list goes on and on. Photos of some of this trailwork can be seen in this Google Photos album:
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipPD33TSN5_i4S6knTGCo2k53KWizGsV2s7-Zja6zp-D1BN6iYq6nF oKttJ1z0wCqg?key=b3UxZ2NpREpSbTREckJ2VlhxcXp2cWxIaDE3UTV3 Although there is no factual basis for this, Mr. Cuvelo, Ms. Bolbol, and Ms. Mercer continue to characterize the Soho Circle/ “”Flow”” trail and “”Ensatina”” trails as “”illegal”” or “”rogue”” trails. As pointed out in the Waterdog Open Space Stewards’ February 14, 2022 letter, these characterizations are wrong. Those are legacy trails, and both trails appear on the trail map approved by City Council in 1998 as and are identified in solid orange lines as “proposed single-use trail.” (Original and highlighted maps attached here for convenience.) For whatever reason, these two trails did not make their way onto the published trail map back in the late 1990s. These trails have been there for decades and are sustainable. These trails provide variety, spread out trail traffic which increases safety, and in the case of Soho Circle trail, provides access for maintenance of storm drain infrastructure.

In response to commenter Pat Cuvielo’s accusation to the Commission of changing its process for this item, I very much appreciated Comr. Mittelstadt’s setting the record straight by calmly explaining what the process was, and how it was identical to the process that is always followed.

Thank you again for the substantial amount of time you volunteer to serve on the commission, receive public comment during meetings, and reading the additional written public input.

Sincerely,
Paul Sheng
Paul Sheng
4/7/2022 Hello,
Hi all, my name is Jack. I’d like to first start with a big vote of thanks to the team running this process; I think you all are doing a great job. I’m a resident of San Mateo going on 4 years and I am also a volunteer with the Waterdog Trail Keepers and have helped to maintain the trail network, rehabilitate areas of the open space, and we have also closed off some trails that were not sustainable.

Id like to voice my support for maintaining the inclusive and equitable multi-use designation of the trails in the open space, and for their ongoing maintenance and upkeep with the possibility of new growth to adapt to the changing conditions and needs of the area.

Looking at the currently published guiding principles of this process, there are a few items that stand out in my mind; safe, inclusive and equitable access, facilitating activities across a range of interests, actively maintaining the spaces to sustain the natural environment, and adapting to changing conditions and needs.

Jack Gaynor
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1101

APPENDIX I
574 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/7/2022
(con’t)
In my opinion the best way to meet these principles is to maintain the multi-use designation of the trails and to continue the great work being done to conserve the trail network, and to look to grow and upgrade the trail network so it can safely and sustainably be enjoyed by the many different people of our community for years to come.

Well built and maintained trails facilitate ongoing and sustainable use of open spaces by a variety of users whether they be bikers, hikers, dog walkers, trail runners. There are proven methods that allow for clear sight lines, speed regulation, and proper drainage and sustainable use that also provide for an engaging experience for trail users and I’d like to advocate for additional efforts, both from volunteers and the city to maintain, upgrade and grow the grail network in the open space. Local organizations like the Sierra Buttes Trail Stewardship and the Santa Cruz Mountains Trail Stewardship have proven that multi-use trails can be built and maintained and such trail networks bring tangible benefits to the trail users and the local community and the team putting together the Open Space plan should reach out to these organizations to learn from their successful trail stewardship practices and to apply their practices to the Belmont Open Space.

Actively maintaining the open space is in my opinion the way to achieve the guiding principles of this process; restricting access to certain user groups fundamentally goes against the guidelines to provide equitable and inclusive access.

Given the changing conditions over the last 2 years I’d also like to advocate for additional facilities possibly in nearby park spaces to support the various users of the park and to enable inclusive and equitable access; permanent toilets, drinking facilities for people and pets, bike repairs stands, expanded parking I look forward to seeing the outcomes of this plan and continuing to enjoy the multi-use trails for many years to come.

Thanks,
Jack
Jack Gaynor
4/7/2022 Dear Parks and Rec Commission,
At Tuesday night’s PROS Advisory Committee meeting I was excited to hear from John Baas (PhD) and botanist and wetlands ecologist Ivy (I didn’t catch her last name) from WRA Environmental Consultants. It was encouraging to hear their preliminary findings: the open spaces in Belmont including Waterdog and San Juan Canyon are currently in pretty good shape with regards to ecosystem health.

Ivy mentioned two species in particular that she considered important in her assessment, the San Francisco Dusky Footed Wood Rat and a yellow blossomed shrub that is endemic to the San Francisco bay area, the Wester Leatherwood. Both appear to have healthy populations in the parks.

My son and I were riding our bikes in Waterdog just yesterday (4/6/22) and while waiting for me to catch up on the Rambler trail, he spotted a bob cat sitting quietly on the trail ahead, about 50 feet away, watching him. It’s common knowledge that apex predators prefer healthy ecosystems over degraded ones.

The analysis done by an independent and neutral third party (WRA), although preliminary, clearly demonstrates that the ecological health of the open spaces is reasonably good and therefore compatible with current recreational usage patterns.

Going forward, I hope that residents who continue to falsely assert that recreation is destroying the wildlife and the overall ecosystem in our open spaces are understood to be inconsistent with the professional ecologists.

Furthermore, we hear plenty of complaints from the same residents that the trail density is too high in our open spaces. Since our open spaces are not nature preserves, the city is under no obligations regarding trail density. Our current open spaces are considered healthy by professional ecologists so trail density at it’s current level appears sustainable.

Frankly, I think the open spaces could use more trails. The public opinion poll conducted by Gates and Associates last year clearly shows that our residents like to get outside to hike, walk their dogs and ride bikes. What’s wrong with priding ourselves on having abundant properly built and maintained trails? Sincerely,
Scott Sisemore
Scott Sisemore
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1102
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 575
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/7/2022 Hello PROS plan advocates and commission,
Today I am sending you a quick note as follow up to the two nights of meetings this week, both of which I attended and participated in with public comment. Thank you all for your time and effort on this important matter!
I enjoyed WRAs presentation on Tuesday evening, and found their group to be well qualified given their extensive experience and credentials. It was great to hear from subject matter experts on the state of our open space, and was glad to hear that their scientists have already been out in the field for substantial time to catalog species and to gain a deep understanding of our recreational open space. And, I was heartened to hear WRA state that from their perspective the health of our forest and open space is quite good. This is what I personally believe to be true, but always nice to hear it confirmed by a real expert! I express my condolences that you and others continue to take abuse from a small anti-recreation vocal minority. I cringe every time they come on for public comment just to criticize, lecture, and name call - often times deliberately trying to spread misinformation. But this is democracy, and so they must be heard.

Last night, after I made my personal comments in the public setting, I was derided by the next speaker Pat Cuvielo as ‘Ignorant, ignorant, ignorant....’ Now, given the source of the criticism, I’m not feeling too hurt! But I would suggest that this is the sort of behavior we don’t want to tolerate as a city, and it may be worthwhile setting more concrete ground rules at the beginning of each contested meeting to inform folks that this sort of behavior is not acceptable - if you agree.

I also worry that the comments of myself and others who are in the camp of ‘pro enviroment AND pro recreation’ can also get repetitive. Personally, I tend to show up to these meetings in order to provide what I hope is a more balanced view. That said, I really appreciated commissioner Michaels comments last night. Paraphrasing, I heard that it would be appreciated if public comments would provide reasonable plans that incorporate both sides of the argument. Well said! I don’t want the only public voices you hear to be from the anti-recreation group, because as we know from the citywide survey - the majority of our city is very supportive of recreational open space and multi use trail access. The challenge we have, is that the anti-recreation group seems to have lots of time on their hands, whereas most folks in the city have jobs and families to care for.......

The issue we face at home, is much like we see on the national level and abroad. Issues are ever more hyper-polarized, and so groups feel like they can only get what they want if they argue extremes - and this can get very boring and repetitive. How can we change the conversation? I’m open to suggestions and feel free to reach out to me directly for a conversation.

Last night I mentioned that our discussions feel like groundhog day - and they do! Its the same old arguments swirling around and around. The last speaker of the night, Mike, said it more eloquently. One statement he said I really liked. “we have to get to a point where we can make good use of this resource and be environmentally sound while we do it.” I think that captures the issue perfectly in my mind.

I don’t have a great or concrete solution to the problem at hand, other than we have to work through a process that at times feels slow and inefficient.

I do think that setting stronger ground rules at the beginning of these meetings would be helpful. Let folks know that name calling or bullying is unacceptable, and remind folks that first and foremost we are neighbors and we all want the same thing - a continued vibrant and healthy open space system. I would also suggest that you consider setting concrete boundaries to disallow agenda related comments during the general comment period. Last night we all sat through 30 minutes of agenda related comments which were allowed into the general comments, and this then pushed the dog discussion and PROS discussion later than they needed to be.

So in summary, I want to thank you all again for your hard work and thoughtfulness as we approach this hot topic!
I’m confident that we will get to a great solution for both the environment and for the entire community that loves and cherishes our beautiful open space.

All the best,
Thaddeus Block
Thaddeus Block
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1103

APPENDIX I
576 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/7/2022 Brigitte, Commissioners and PROS:

On 4/5, I attended the Open Space PROS Advisory meeting but was dismayed to learn that this was the PROS Advisory’s last meeting for the entire project! I believe a 5th PROS Advisory meeting devoted entirely to Open Space is absolutely necessary. Not allowing another PROS Advisory meeting for further discussion on our Open Space would be violating your last guiding principle to “Utilize a transparent Community Process to inform Decisions”.

This was the first opportunity for the PROS Advisory Committee to hear and see the WRA overview slide presentation on Open Space with no prior information given to the Committee for review. In a series of 30 rapid slides, John Baas, the project manager quickly covered the goals/policies which included the right “”buzzwords””, trail maintenance, habitat restoration, adaptive trail management, wildfire, environmental protection, visitor demand and safety and management, use of e-bikes, new unauthorized trails and protection of riparian resources which could have been used in any open space presentation. He provided no specifics or details regarding Belmont’s Open Space leaving both participants and observers bewildered, scrambling to take notes as he spoke. Without presenting any relevant information specific to Belmont’s Open Space, he asked the PROS Advisory Committee to help determine the allocation of his hypothetical pie chart which despite hypothetical, put a very low priority on important issues of Trail maintenance and Adaptive Trail Management which was not defined clearly.

Both the PROS committee and Park & Rec Commission appeared confused and wondering what WRA expected from the Advisory Committee regarding each of these topics which could be an in depth discussion by itself. Several Advisory members even commented it was premature to assess any pie allocation before seeing a report with more information. One member asked for another Advisory meeting and I agree that this request should be granted, not only to determine the pie allocation but to discuss each of the goals/policies for our Open Space.

To devote only one PROS Advisory meeting to the most important issue for Belmont, Waterdog Open Space and San Juan Canyon, after devoting so much time and effort to other parts of the PROS plan such as Neighborhood Parks is not only unfair, it appears to be attempting to bypass the proper process due for this important topic. Clearly, more specifics and information on each of WRA’s goals and policies for Belmont as well as much more clarification on his 2 management alternatives briefly mentioned with no explanations are sorely needed before any assessment can be given. The PROS Advisory Committee deserves another meeting to discuss WRA’s recommendations and alternatives before any decisions are made.

The PROS process up till now has been fairly transparent and informative with proper focus groups and meetings providing guidance. Let’s not mess up your hard fought process now by rushing through this most important topic of Belmont’s Open Space without giving the PROS Advisory Committee their right to discuss and analyze WRA’s recommendations and alternatives.

Thank you for your attention.

Jennifer Lien
Jennifer Lien
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1104
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 577
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/7/2022 In the April 5 WRA presentation I was pleased to hear mention of several important issues long overlooked in Belmont; riparian habitats, redundant and poorly designed trails, benchmarking stewardship policies of other open space districts, and the concept of adaptive management. I’m optimistic that Belmont can create an enlightened vision for a sustainable, biodiverse and healthy native habitat for our open spaces.

However Belmont’s Conservation Element policies regarding wildlife and natural habitat were largely omitted from the WRA draft goals. As you are aware, the Conservation Element is the section of our General Plan that addresses management of Open Space in Belmont, and as such is the most critical input into the Open Space plan. This is why the City RFP specifically cited awareness of Conservation Element policies.

Belmont General Plan section 4.1: “The Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Element bears a strong relationship to the Conservation Element, which is required to provide direction regarding the conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources. The Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Element addresses open space for outdoor recreation, while the Conservation and Safety elements discuss open space for preservation of natural resources and open space for public health and safety, respectively.” Belmont Conservation Element: “Human safety and recreation opportunities must be balanced with maintaining the proper functioning of natural systems….The habitats of the natural resources open spaces found in Belmont are discussed in more detail in the General Plan EIR.” Goal 5.3: “Protect and restore biological and ecological resources in Belmont, including sensitive wildlife species and their habitats.”
Policy 5.3-4: Maintain functional wildlife corridors and habitat linkage in order to contribute to regional biodiversity and the viability of rare, unique or sensitive biological resources throughout the city and region.

A mere focus on a few “species of special concern” is not adequate; the Conservation Element calls for a broad definition of functional habit for wildlife, including each of the sensitive natural habitat communities discussed in the Element.

Belmont residents are counting on your influence. Please ensure these VITAL goals are incorporated into the Master Plan, along with proposed policies to achieve these goals.

Thank you,
Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
4/10/2022 Dear PROS Plan Commission,
I am writing on behalf of about 40 neighbors who live in the Monte Cresta Dr area.

We have a beloved neighborhood hiking trail which some of us have used for decades - literally since 1975, as one couple told me, and a few other families in the 40-year range as well - which a developer is proposing to turn into a road and housing development.

We walk our dogs on it every day, we have raised our families hiking on this trail. Given the lack of sidewalks in our area, this trail is one of the few protected areas where we can safely walk without worrying about getting hit by traffic.

Its loss or diminishment would materially negatively impact our quality of life, not to mention cause ecological damage in disturbing the native flora and fauna of the area, especially given the excessive grading that would be required given the steep slope of the lots.

Can you give us any advice as to how to preserve access to this trail, possibly by having it recognized as protected open space?
This trail is the ”paper road” or “unimproved section” of Monte Cresta Dr.

Would love to set up some time to chat on this matter.

Best, Jen Lai
Jen Lai
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1105

APPENDIX I
578 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/11/2022 Dear PROS Committee and Park Commissioners,
At the April 5 presentation by WRA, the PROS committee appropriately refused to speculate on resource allocation for our Open Space until they see the written assessment of the current ecological conditions (to know our needs). While our open space may seem healthy to the casual observer, there are many issues that have degraded the natural habitat – some in the past and some continuing. To omit, and thus ignore, these known issues will be simply greenwashing; we can’t tackle our issues until we acknowledge them and agree they need fixing.

Some of these issues reflect a lack of standards, and others constitute vandalism pure and simple.

Belmont lacks standards for trail construction, defined trail use policies, and enforceable laws against vandalism of public lands. So long as we allow damaging practices we will be stuck in a cycle of constant repair and maintenance – working harder yet falling behind. However, if we first put a stop to ongoing damages, then we can free up future resources to invest in restoration and recreation. This is a principle of adaptive management, which WRA urges for Belmont. I expect to see the following issues included in the WRA Open Space assessment:

Trails, geology, hydrology:

Poorly designed trails; straight down slopes (causing erosion gullies, safety concerns), across steep crossslopes (destabilizing slopes), encroaching on streams, and crossing mapped debris flows, Unsanctioned trails allowed to proliferate unaddressed, Active debris flows/landslides,
Dumping of soil and cuttings into creeks, diverting natural flow, increasing silting and spreading invasives, Blockage of creek by wet crossings,
Drainage culverts (concrete) clogged or overgrown,
Exposed soils and destabilized slopes resulting from clear-cutting for fire breaks, Habitat and vegetation:

Excessive trail density fragmenting habitat (2-5 times more miles per acre than comparable open spaces), Unnecessary removal of native vegetation far beyond the trail width, including native white yarrow, sticky monkey, sage and oaks,
Abutting homes’ vandalism including: topping public trees, stairs and paths from gates, invasive species from back gardens, dumping of brush cuttings, broad spraying Roundup on open space, drainage pipes/ culverts discharge into open space,
Soil and cuttings shoveled downhill onto vegetation below, Encroachment on riparian habitats and vital water sources for wildlife, Sudden oak death,
Invasive species, most notably broom but also thistle, pines, and pampas grass, Drainage diverted directly onto oaks, leading to the decline and death of the tree, Trails and shortcuts undermining or compressing tree roots, leading to instability and decline of the tree, Improper branch cutting destabilizing the tree or introducing pathogens, Lumber and tools from unknown sources unmonitored, bringing pathogens and invasives.

I hope WRA, PROS representatives and City officials will ensure the new master plan addresses these issues.

Thank you,
Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
4/13/2022 Hello Kelley,
In follow-up to both the most recent PROS meeting and P&R commission meeting, I, too, would like to recommend to WRA that they review what the Santa Cruz Mountains Trail Stewardship (https:// santacruztrails.org/about) organization does. This group was just in the SJ Mercury news this week about their partnership to build more trails in newly obtained public land. I know that the LA and Marin county plans were used as a resource, but this is closer to home.

Also, any mention of the San Francisco garter snake by a non-herpetologist needs to be verified. It is a beautiful snake that also has others that look similar. I learned this years ago at a meeting of the Bay Area Amphibian and Reptile Society :-)
Thanks so very, very much for bearing with us in the community.

Best regards,
Lynn Bell
Lynn Bell
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1106
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 579
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/14/2022 Please do not limit mountain bike access in the WaterDog park. I really enjoy riding there during the weekdays as it is close to my house, the trails are well maintained, and it has a very good diversity of easy to technical trails. I personally try my best to be polite to all trail users, dog walkers, and whatever kind of animals I see and share the trails with.

It is my personal belief that mountain bikers should give way to all other trail users, which is something I practice each and every ride.

WaterDog also is a relative haven for young people who may not have access to drive long distances to enjoy outdoor activities, such as hiking and mountain biking. These outdoor activities should be encouraged and supported rather than discouraged and made impossible by a select, albeit very vocal, elites minority.

I believe most trail users share the same philosophy whether on bike or on foot. I also do hike those trails and walk my dog there on occasion and I’ve never had a bad interaction with any one yet. I also enjoy riding to the higher elevations, getting off the bike and admiring the views.

As for making it a nature preserve, what good is that if people aren’t allowed to enjoy nature first hand? There is precious little open space left in the Bay Area where people can personally enjoy and interact with nature, especially on a mountain bike, please don’t limit this further.

I have lived in San Mateo County my entire 63 years and have seen too much land taken away from residents in the name of ‘progress’ and conservation. We need to have someplace to ride, hike, and walk.

Sincerely,
Russell Roeckel
Russell Roeckel
4/20/2022 Hi Brigitte,
I wanted to let you know that I had a Zoom meeting with Craig Michaels last nite and presented the attached Powerpoint and video (Plse continue scrolling twice after the video to see my suggestions for Policy Actions and Goals). I want to be transparent and honest with you as I believe you have been with those of us that are trying to help preserve the future of Waterdog Open Space (I didn’t want you to think I was going over your head by responding to Craig’s invitation at the last P&R meeting to talk directly to the public).

I made it clear to him that my number 1 priority is Fairness and Equity which are the first and third guiding principles of the PROS plan and in order to accomplish that, Hikers need their own narrow trails to enjoy secluded, peaceful, nature walks without having to worry that a mountain biker will be whizzing by forcing them to rush to the sides of the trails to let them pass. Many of our neighbor residents have let it be known to us that they no longer walk Waterdog trails because they are too dangerous and have instead driven their cars to other parks to enjoy nature. How is that Fair and Equitable to Hikers when Mountain Bikers from all over the Bay Area are allowed to run uncontrolled on All our trails forcing Hikers to have to go elsewhere?
Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely,
Jennifer
(You need to download the attached Powerpoint first and then you can watch at your leisure) Powerpoint Show
https://mega.nz/file/fxpCDIIT#uUoD0PX8qoZe0WJZSaKa6-SHmCUbTwfYwWHB13s4DU4 Jennifer Lien
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1107

APPENDIX I
580 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
4/22/2022 Hi PROS Team,
Brigitte suggested I forward you my presentation and email that I sent to her and made to Craig Michaels over Zoom this week.

Below the links to the Powerpoint presentation in PDF and the KCRA video separately because the video is too big to play in the original link.

Link to presentation in pdf format
https://www.dropbox.com/s/d32qz2prf9sg34a/Craig%20Presentation%20v2.pdf?dl=0 Link to KCRA 3 video referenced in the pdf
https://www.dropbox.com/s/w1e7tz3rbayu9uk/Illegal%20Trail%20Bike%20Jump%202%20-%20KCRA%20 SOHO%20Low%20Low%20Res.mp4?dl=0
Thank you for your attention.

Jennifer Lien
Jennifer Lien
4/29/2022 Dear Commissioners,
I recently read the comments made during the April 6 Parks and Rec meeting and was both encouraged and disappointed. I am glad that the consultant, WRA, Inc., seems to be providing unbiased information.

However, I noted that there continues to be two competing factions and that an appropriate compromise may not be reached. I am concerned that in an effort to appease a vocal group of mountain bikers, the true intent of the land gift will be dismissed. In regard to reaching a compromise, I believe the comment made by Jennifer who “called for all unauthorized trails to be closed, for some trails to be designated for hiking only (per the 1992 Plan), and for e-bikes to be banned,” is a very fair and sound approach. While the city does want to encourage biking, it should be clear that biking to stores or work is different from recreational biking. E-bikes do not belong in the Open Space. I do not appreciate the buzz of a motor anywhere near me in what should be a quiet and peaceful place to enjoy nature. I do not want to worry about a cyclist trying to negotiate past me on a narrow trail. I do not like to worry about bikes whizzing by, but I can put up with that provided the path is wide enough to accommodate two-way traffic.

Thank you for your attention.

Regards,
Connie Tettenborn
Connie
Tettenborn
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1108
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 581
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
5/4/2022 I would like to comment on the WRA presentation presented in April and also ask about the revised plans for Hallmark Park.

First, regarding Hallmark Park. During the discussions of various park redesigns and future plans, it was discussed and I believe pretty much agreed that there is not a desire for a bocce ball court or an “event structure” at the meadow above Hallmark. The current website does not show any revision to the original proposed plan. When will the revision be posted on the PROS Plan website? Regarding the Water Dog Open Space, I want to make several comments.

The presentation by WRA was extensive and overall well done but I feel several points need to be made.

As an Advisory Committee member, long time Belmont resident of 30+ years and daily hiker on the John Brooks, Rambler and Chaparral trails, I feel that the surveys done missed several things:

1. Currently there are very few animals seen in the Open Space compared to prior years. In the past, it was common to see deer, rabbits, quail, coyotes and other wildlife.

2. Due to bikers now coming from all over the Bay Area as a mountain biking destination, many of my Belmont neighbors do not hike the trails as they consider it too dangerous. My wife and I have been nearly hit over a dozen times over the last 2-3 years by speeding bikers coming around blind curves. Many of the trails are only 24-36 inches wide which is not wide enough for a biker and a walker/hiker to pass safely.

Certainly, many bikers are careful but many are not and view the trails as a mountain bike race competition.

It’s interesting to note that many residents feel it is literally safer to walk on the streets than walk on the WD trails!

3. The bikes have ravaged the trails in many cases destroying tree roots, cutting the roots and in many cases making the trails so slick that it is difficult to walk or hike them.

4. Some of the Open Space(John Brooks) was specifically granted as a donation with the proviso that it be a “preserve”. Obviously this is not taken into consideration anymore and I don’t understand why.

Currently it is almost impossible to have a quiet “nature” walk there with bikers or the fear of bikers running a person over.

5. Many illegally constructed trails have been cut into the Open Space by the biker community. Let’s close these.

6. I strongly recommend that there be a separation of biker or multi purpose trails from hiker/walker trails.

I truly believe it’s important to allow bikers-young and old- to bike the area but keep these two areas separate. Bikers should only be allowed on trails 48 inches or more wide. As you probably know, many local open space parks do not allow bikers at all.

I’m very concerned about the future of this beautiful resource we have. Let’s use it but protect it so it remains a sustainable habitat for nature and wildlife in our city.

Thank you!
Bob Stahl“
Bob Stahl
5/9/2022 Dear Parks & Recreation Commission,
I watched the 5/4/22 Meeting and it seems to me that the consultant WRA is doing a very thorough and reasoned assessment of the open space. Their presentation was very informative, and validates what most community members have been saying all along, which is that the forests in Waterdog and San Juan are healthy, and contrary to what a tiny group of partisans keeps saying, the sky is not falling. It’s becoming obvious now that the same four people in the community are the only ones who are making comments against shared multi-use access: Deniz Bolbol, Pat Cuvielo, Kristen Mercer, and the woman who has the screen name of “”ennifer” or “Jenn Jenn.” I feel badly that both you and the consultant have to endure their tirades at every meeting. Please know that the community as a whole appreciates your all the time and effort you’ve been putting into this monumental task.

I was really taken aback at a public comment Kristen Mercer made. She said something to the effect that children and seniors can’t use the Waterdog trails because they’re too scared of bikes. No evidence to support this was cited of course. That is the complete opposite of my experience. I ride and hike Waterdog on at least a weekly basis, and I see plenty of seniors and young children on the trails. She tried to claim it was an equity issue, but couching an ageist statement like this in equity terms is beyond the pale. Seniors can and do ride mountain bikes. You don’t need to take my word for it, please see the attached letters (which I got from the PROS plan resource page) from seniors and near-seniors who cycle the trails and support multi-use.

Paul Sheng
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1109

APPENDIX I
582 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
5/9/2022 “Jenn Jenn” lodged some grievance that the consultant is failing to consider the impact of “all the mountain bikers from all over the bay area who ride all the trails.” This over-the-top statement belies a complete misunderstanding of the role Waterdog plays in the local trail resource system. Waterdog is a small trail system and is good for maybe a two hour or so ride. It is not a “destination” trail system. Yes, cyclists from out of town will ride Waterdog every now and again, but there’s not enough there to make it a major attraction - it’s not worth driving an hour plus to get to. If cyclists drive all the way from the South Bay, North Bay, or East Bay to the Peninsula, it’s much more worth their while to ride the exponentially larger trail networks in the MidPeninsula Open Space District such as El Corte De Madera, Russian Ridge, Skyline Ridge, Saratoga Gap, and so on. For example, in Santa Cruz County, there is a small trail system at De La Vega Park, similarly sized to Waterdog. I’ve ridden there once or twice, but if I’m going to drive all the way to Santa Cruz County, It’s much more worthwhile to ride the much larger trail systems at Soquel Demonstration Forest, Wilder Ranch, and so on. Anyway, if cyclists from out of town want to ride our trails, we should welcome them just as parks and open space areas in other areas welcome us. “Jenn Jenn” does not seem to understand the first two guiding PROS principles, which are to provide equitable access to resources and activities across the entire city, and promote inclusion to people of all backgrounds, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic position, or physical/cognitive ability. I always wonder if there is an undercurrent of racism behind these “locals only” attitudes. We saw this when this same group of folks were demanding that the Crystal Springs Cross Country Course be limited to local athletes only, which would shut out high school athletes from more diverse school districts from the East Bay and Central Valley. ”Locals only” seems like a racist dog whistle for “whites only.” It wouldn’t be a Parks & Rec Meeting if Deniz Bolbol and Pat Cuvielo didn’t make public comment about some perceived environmental disaster, but what was unusual about this meeting was that they both made comment on the agenda item on the consultant update, and later in the meeting, after comment for that item was closed, and public comment was opened up for items not on the agenda. As soon as that comment period opened, they both took the opportunity to make public comments about the consultant report. During Ms. Bolbol’s comment, a commissioner started to say ”with all due respect this time is for comments on items not on the agenda...” but Ms. Bolbol talked over the commissioner and bullied her way into completing her comment. If feel the Commission should take stronger action when public commenters are abusing the process like this. The Commission would be well within its rights to cut these comments off. It is unfair to the public, when someone who has already made a comment on an agenda item takes a “Mulligan” and gets further comment in, during a period with others are not expecting those comments to be made and are not prepared to respond. I would respectfully suggest that the Commission consult with the City Attorney on how to handle this situation in the future, because it is certain to happen again.

Thanks again for everything you’re doing, and keep up the good work. I think both the Commission and WRA are doing an excellent job of moving this process to the finish line in a measured, transparent, and considerate way.

Regards,
Paul Sheng
Paul Sheng
5/15/2022 Dear Commissioners and PROS committee,
I was frustrated to hear WRA consultants deny that Belmont’s open spaces serve as a wildlife corridor. It appears they confused the terms “wildlife migration” (long-distance seasonal movement of entire flocks or herds) with the correct term “connectivity corridors” (daily individual travel between interconnected open spaces).

All Belmont residents know we have wildlife in our canyons – we see them daily on trails and meadows, and our cameras capture their nocturnal ventures into our yards. And we also intuitively know they cannot survive within these open space pockets alone – they travel between canyons by crossing streets, yards, and even alleys. These open spaces are not isolated islands – they are part of a large habitat archipelago.

The consultants who wrote the General Plan Open Space and Conservation Elements, and 1992 Open Space Master Plan, as well as the California Department of Fish and Wildlife all recognize Belmont open spaces as part of a network of connected open spaces, important in preserving the biodiversity of our native species. To familiarize you with these authoritative sources, and how wildlife corridors work, I’ve put the facts into a few slides, below, and attach here the USDA Information Sheet on the topic.

The presence of nature and wildlife is what drew us to live in these hills. Residents decry the saddening trend of fewer and fewer wildlife sightings, as human activity increases in their habitat. We entrust you to create plans and policies that embody our General Plan and preserve the habitat and connected corridors critical to our native wildlife.

Thank you,
Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1110
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 583
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
5/18/2022 My name is Richard Newhauser. I live on Wakefield Dr. in Belmont and my backyard butts up to the Waterdog park.

I support continued multi-use access to Waterdog. Waterdog has been successfully managed as a mutliuse trail system for decades, and the trails have been sustainable based in large part due to volunteer trailwork by cyclists, through the Waterdog Trailkeepers.

My family, which includes my two sons, wife, and a dog, enjoy the trails daily through hikes, dog walks and Mt Biking. We love getting into the park as well as looking at it from our backyard.

Please continue to allow multi-access to Waterdog.

All the best,
Richard “Rick” Newhauser
Richard
Newhauser
5/26/2022 Brigitte, Park & Rec Commissioners and PROS Committee:

After more than 2 years, you will be concluding the PROS Master Plan analysis and provide recommendations regarding our Open Space.

During this time, many Belmont residents have provided informational reports, photos, videos and public comments on Waterdog summarized on our Belmont resident website (www.waterdogpreserve.org). The goal of all our efforts has been to guide this new Master Plan toward more Equity and Sustainability than past practices.

This email presentation below summarizes the 4 main Waterdog trail issues with their solutions that allow All users to “Love Waterdog”.

Please take time to read it and think carefully regarding the important decisions you will make that impact us and future generations for years to come.

Thank you for your attention.

Jennifer Lien
P. S. Brigitte, please forward this presentation to WRA consultants.

Jennifer Lien
5/27/2022 Hello,
I plan to attend the Belmont PROS Advisory Committee meeting #5 on May 31. As the time provided for public comment is short and I am not a Belmont resident, I would like to provide some comments via email and let the local folks speak live.

I’m a hiker and mountain biker in Santa Clara County. I visit Waterdog periodically as I have friends in the area. I enjoy the preserve and value the opportunity to ride and hike there. I strongly believe that it should continue to support multiple use including cycling.

More and more, we are seeing that joint engagement from multiple user groups is leading to better open space opportunities. I am an active trail advocate and a frequent volunteer with the Santa Cruz Mountains Trail Stewardship. SCMTS evolved from a mountain biking advocacy organization into a multi-use advocacy and trail building organization, and we are seeing huge benefits from the partnerships the organization has developed with land managers and between user groups. The new trail system developments at Cotoni-Coast Dairies and San Vicente Redwoods, as well as completed projects such as Glenwood Preserve, use modern thinking in trail system and trail design to manage multiple uses. The Trail Stewardship harnesses the power of hundreds of volunteers to do great work for all types of trail users, and works to ensure that all users can have good experiences simultaneously – meaning that goal interference and user conflict is minimized. While the mountain biking advocates in Belmont may not be quite this organized, I see them consistently advocating actively for better behavior, to honor the requests of the land managers, and to maintain trails.

My point is that the route to better open space interaction and experience is to engage the broad community constructively to build better trails and systems, maintain the systems for optimal experiences, and appeal to users to interact respectfully. Mountain biking communities are often the most active and engaged in trail building and maintenance, because they care deeply about quality of trails and have historically been shut out of many trail systems. I believe that Belmont’s best path will be to partner with the trail users including mountain bikers to do work in the system (maintenance; retrofitting for better experience and user interaction; or new trail building where appropriate) and to broadcast and promote the land managers’ requests (trail interaction; respect for the environment; etc.) to their larger user groups.

Thanks very much for your consideration.

Craig Gleason
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1111

APPENDIX I
584 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
5/31/2022 To Whom it May Concern,
I just want to express my support for mountain bike access to Waterdog. Unbiased data shows very limited trail damage by mountain bikers. Data also shows minimal disruption to wildlife. Continuing access to Waterdog not only encourages a healthier lifestyle, the presence of mountain bikers also help the local economy as they support local businesses and restaurants.

Ron
Ron Martin
5/31/2022 Dear PROS Committee, I have lived in San Mateo for 10 years and now in San Carlos for 3. I regularly ride my bike at Waterdog for recreation and fitness 3-4 times a week. I have never had an encounter with anyone in the park that was negative. Hikers, Bikers and Dog walkers all get along great. Limiting access to any of them would greatly impact the local economy in my eyes. From the local bike shop to the starbucks and Lunardis all within minutes for a post ride snack. I just took my 7 year old for his first mountain bike ride last Saturday and he was hooked.

Waterdog is an absolute gem and I would love to continue to ride there for years to come.

Thank You, A Concerned Citizen
Chris Bushman
5/31/2022 Dear Ms. Shearer, Parks commissioners, and staff:

Can you please point me to the 2035 population projections that were used as inputs to the current draft PROS master plan?
I am specifically concerned that the updated draft Housing Element, which won’t be released until June 8 and won’t be finalized until late summer, includes much higher population figures than those in the current General Plan or even the 2017 Belmont Village Specific Plan. It would be good to confirm that the PROS work was done with the most up-to-date population figures.

Thank you,
Joanne Adamkewicz
Joanne
Adamkewicz
5/31/2022 Dear Ms. Shearer,
Thank you very much for getting back to me promptly! I really appreciate that.

It makes sense that the PROS planning process started with the 2017 population projections. However, it is not finalized yet, and I very strongly hope that the latest figures can be incorporated somehow into this 2022 version of the PROS plan update, for two reasons.

First, the new number is much higher than the old forecast of 30,500 residents in 2035. The current population of Belmont is 28,360 per the recent Districting process. The Housing Element projects an additional 4500 (RHNA target build out) to 8250 (full build out) residents, for a total of 32,860 - 36,610 residents by the year 2030. The total by 2035 is unknown but will be even higher - likely more than 25% greater than the 30,500 forecast.

Second, the new population will not be evenly distributed throughout the city. In fact, 99% of the 4500- 8250 new residents will be added to the eastern area of Belmont, raising the existing population of 7100 to as many as 15,000 people, with only nominal growth in the remaining areas of the city. Such lopsided development is a challenge for any city plan, including roads, sewers, schools -- and parks.

I understand that the General Plan and the BVSP can and will be amended to address the growth envisioned in the Housing Element. But those documents deliberately leave the details up to the supporting elements, which includes the PROS master plan. But a plan based on a population forecast that is 25% too low, and with no consideration for geographic distribution of the growth -- such a plan will be obsolete within a year or two, and will fail at its goal of providing a useful blueprint for the future.

I acknowledge that the entire planning exercise unfortunately cannot be re-done with the correct population forecast. It’s too late. The table entitled “”IDEAL AMENITY QUANTITIES FOR 2021 AND 2035 POPULATIONS”” will remain unadjusted for the City’s latest and most accurate population forecast, thus creating an obstacle to accurate planning by other City departments.

So what I am requesting is that the text of the PROS plan acknowledge this disconnect. A statement should be added to the effect that the plan was developed with population forecasts from 2017; that the updated 2022 forecast shows growth to be faster, more dense, and more geographically concentrated than envisioned in the PROS plan; and that therefore, future modifications to the PROS master plan, the General Plan, and the BVSP should be pursued as appropriate to match this growth.

Thank you for your consideration, and thank you for passing this on to your consultants as well.

Joanne
Adamkewicz
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1112
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 585
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/1/2022 Dear Park Commissioners,
At the PROS meeting David Braunstein rightly called out the elephant in the room. To paraphrase: both sides repeat the same arguments without listening to the other – we’ve missed an opportunity to build community.

I have listened and I propose an equitable compromise solution; a trail use plan that provides space for a safe experience for users of differing interests and abilities, while protecting sensitive habitat.

Seniors, families with little children, and those seeking tranquil nature are displaced by speeding bikes on narrow trails, and this imbalance is not equitable. On our streets, pedestrians are not asked to jump off the sidewalk for oncoming bikes.

I have never suggested banning bikes – only that they be limited out of respect for the majority of residents who are NOT mountain bikers. ALL visitors have a right to use trails, but bikes are machinery for a sport that requires appropriate trails.

I think this plan checks all the boxes! But I hope to inspire discussion with “the other side”, who also have a right to enjoy their hobby in a safe and sustainable manner. I hope this compromise plan can move us forward to a solution that is equitable for all abilities and interest groups.

Thank you
Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
6/1/2022 Dear Commissioners and Committee members,
I spoke briefly after the PROS plan advisory committee meeting last night and thought it might be helpful to provide the following link. As I mentioned, the WRA, Inc., consulting firm neglected to review the documentation regarding the land gift of Waterdog Open Space. A discussion of it at a council meeting can be found here:
https://www.waterdogpreserve.org/brooks-contact-violated There were two requirements: That it be named something like “”The John S. Brooks Memorial Preserve”” and that it be retained in perpetuity as open space with perhaps trails that are low use as at that time.

Considering “”Habitat protection emphasis”” an alternative is simply wrong. It is not an alternative option- -it is the PURPOSE of an open space. “”Preserve”” is in the actual name that was suggested! Any consideration of new trails must take this into account. For example, putting in a connecting path for bikes would possibly create an unacceptable increase in usage levels. No e-bikes should be permitted because they are motorized, including pedal-assist bikes. (Except for officers enforcing the leash law!) I did not have time to clarify my concluding remark about single-use trails. I would only be willing to allow bikes on the narrow trails if they slowed WAY down to pass and did not make me step close to poison oak to let them by.

Thank you,
Connie Tettenborn
Connie
Tettenborn
6/4/2022 Hi John and Robin (please forward to Robin as I don’t have her email) Thank you for your OSMP plan presented to PROS Advisory meeting on 5/31. You have asked for feedback and I have some suggestions since I have been involved with this process for over 2 years as a resident hiker living in Belmont for over 40 years.

I have reviewed Category 2 of your plan (P19-34) “”Balancing recreational uses and Trail Management””; both your Base Plan “”must haves”” and your supplemental Recreational Alternatives Implementation (Easy, Medium or Hard) of the OSMP. PROS Advisory Committee members and Commissioners indicated that the OSMP appeared very general and vague and I agree. Rather than using general words like “”design, improve, prohibit, diversify, modify, adopt, diminish, add and develop””, the Base plan needs more specific implementation actions related to Waterdog. Below are “”must haves”” implementation specifics that would provide transparency and clarity in your final plan.

1. Clarify Single and Multi-Use Trails
Are your definitions and criteria the same as defined in the 1992 Master Plan listed below? Over the past decade, these official guidelies for single-use have been discarded by recreational bikers making All trails unofficially multi-use. To this day, the City 2020 Trail map uses the term Single-Track trail and Wide Trail with no clarification, definitions, guidelines or criteria to distinguish each trail type.

Sierra Club Guidelines for off street Biking
Jennifer Lien
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1113

APPENDIX I
586 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/4/2022
(con’t)

2. Designate Single-use for Hikers Only, Multi-use for both Bikers and Hikers (P20) Add definitions, guidelines and criteria for single-use and multi-use trails. Single-use trails for hikers are necessary because aggressive biking behavior on trails not designed for safe passing without long sitelines and on steep slopes create a public safety hazard for ALL users. Safety concerns have marginalized non-bike users which are the majority of residents.

3. Clarify that this statement is for authorized trails only. (P21)

4. Add “Balancing Recreation with Preserving Functional Ecosystems” (P23) Nowhere in your Base Plan is there a policy statement regarding the need to balance recreation with maintenance of natural systems, however, Belmont’s General Plan clearly states “Human Safety and Recreation must be balanced with maintaining the proper function of Natural Systems” (Sec. 5.3).

5. Add criteria and conditions for closing existing unauthorized, unsafe and damaged trails and modification of altered trails (P27)
Define and include criteria for legacy trails. P27 addresses future modification and approvals on open space lands but lacks policy on closing existing unauthorized, unsafe and damaged trails.

Specifically, close Soho trail, illegally built in 2017 and the Riparian trail that damages the riparian habitat as they both violate the John Brooks donation contract (John Brooks contract and the 1977 Belmont City Council minutes attached below).

Specifically, realign Canyon Creek trail that crosses the riparian habitat and Finch East to its original plan along the canyon rim to protect the wildlife and natural vegetation; away from all sensitive habitat and special status species located in the valley.

Define and provide criteria for legacy trails that includes public review, engineering studies and environmental impact analysis.

John Brooks Donation Contract: “Maintain as an unspoiled wild area or ”green belt” in perpetuity” Belmont City Council acknowledges John Brooks wishes and conditions.

6. Add “no group activity permit should be issued if it involves noise that would disturb wildlife or other users” (P30)
Change E-bike recommendation to allow for public discussion prior to conducting any policies and studies.

Motorized E-bike noise is unnatural amplified sound that disturbs natural tranquility.

7. Add maximum 15 mph bike speed with enforcement Signage (P31) Delete equestrians as they are not allowed in Waterdog
“Focusing on slowing travel speeds, maintaining safe speeds and adding calming features” can easily be accomplished by imposing a maximum 15 mph bike speed that many other parks and Sierra Club guidelines have already recommended. Without noting an actual speed, “safe speed” is purely subjective and meaningless.

Sierra Club policy observes a maximum speed limit of 15mph for all bicycles.

I hope the above suggestions for Base Plan Actions will assist you in providing more clarity, specifics and details regarding balanced recreation with ecosystem conservation in your final OSMP.

Thank you for your attention.

Jennifer Lien
Jennifer Lien
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1114
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 587
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/5/2022 Hi John and Robin (Please forward as I don’t have Robin’s email), Thank you for your OSMP presented to Belmont’s PROS Committee on May 31, 2022.

Our region is rated as a “Biodiversity Hotspot”, and Belmont’s Open Spaces are an integral and connected pocket of natural habitat essential to continuing biodiversity. But our open space is also essential to resident health and education. So achieving a sustainable balance between protection and recreation is the most important objective of this Plan. I thus object to the sly, but significant, replacement of “maintenance” for the actual General Plan priority of “maintaining the proper function of natural systems.” Throughout my comments, attached, you will find balance between environment, recreation and natural hazards woven into the objective, policy and action. Decision makers need WRA to help craft clear criteria to weigh this balance.

As observed by the PROS committee and Commission, many items are vague or lack specifics. Differing interpretations of current City Plans has led to conflict and inaction, so it’s essential that the plan help clarify, not muddy the waters. Thus, I submit for your consideration very specific edits intended to provide clarity and avoid misinterpretation, to reduce future disputes.

Thank you for your consideration,
Kristin Mercer
Kristin Mercer
6/10/2022 Dear Belmont City Council,
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

My son and I have both worked on maintaining and improving trails in waterdog (at organized trail work days). The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Best,
Nigel Ray
Nigel Ray
6/10/2022 As a long time Belmont resident, Advisory Committee member, and an individual who hikes the Water Dog trails 200+ days per year, I was very shocked and disappointed that the majority of Park & Rec Commissioners have already stated that they will recommend “multi use” trails in the Water Dog Open Space. This was stated at the Park & Rec meeting last week. I feel this decision does not take into consideration the numerous Belmont residents who feel that the most trails are unsafe due to the preponderance of bikers on narrow trails. It also is in conflict with the recommendation of the WRA report which lists on Table 9 to “Implement single-use and one-way trail segments in areas identified in the Recreation Use Assessment following sufficient public outreach”.

The WRA study also states that the trails should be designed and improved to facilitate safe trail use by all visitors. The decision to make all trails multi use violates this WRA recommendation in section P20.

In section P21, WRA states “the City may prohibit certain trail uses or apply increased trail use restrictions within certain areas to enhance safety, minimize conflicts between trail users, and protect natural resources areas””. Why can’t a certain number of trails be designated for hikers/ walkers only and this be implemented so that hikers do not have to worry about their safety and being run over by bikers? These should be the following trails: Berry, Chaparral, Raccoon Run, Rambler, Ohlone, Canyon Creek and Raccoon Run.

As I stated, I and my wife hike the WD trails 200+ days per year and have done so for many years. We have been nearly hit by bikers 6 times in the last 12 months. The bikers have stated: “show us the statistics of injuries or accidents caused by bikers”. Obviously the near misses to me and my wife do not show up in records but I can guarantee you that these near accidents have happened. Many of these near accidents occurred when bikers came around blind curves. They could not see us and we could not see them until the last seconds. We had to jump off the trail to avoid being hit. I must also say that numerous residents we meet walking on Belmont streets will no longer hike the WD trails due to the danger posed by the bikers.

Many residents say it is not enjoyable or conducive to a peaceful walk anymore as they have to constantly watch out for bikers.

Bob Stahl
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1115

APPENDIX I
588 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/10/2022
(con’t)
In the past two years we see less animals(deer, rabbits, quail, etc.) than in the past. Whereas we used to see deer on a weekly basis, we’ve seen only 3 deer since the beginning of this year.

In addition, many of the trails are damaged by bikers who have worn down the trails and made it so slick it is hard to climb some of the hilly areas. The bikes have also damaged many tree roots.

I must also request that you restrict the use of E bikes on the trails. E bikes go up to 28 MPH. Even Class 1 E bikes go 20 MPH and that can cause a severe injury if someone is hit by an E biker going 20 MPH.

E bikes usually are 45-50 pounds and if someone is hit by an E bike at 15-20 MPH, they will be severely injured. Many are designed just like motor cycles and do not need pedal assist. These bikes are not safe for other users on the trails.

Please take these ideas into consideration before finalizing your recommendations to the City Council. I believe it is your duty to represent all trail users. So far, you have shown favoritism to the bikers-many of them who do not even live in Belmont.

Thank you.

Bob Stahl
Bob Stahl
6/10/2022 Hi,
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails (Ensatina and Labor of Love), and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Best,
Nara Balakrishna
Nara Balakrishna
6/10/2022 Hi,
In addition to the template below, I also want to add that mountain biking is a fast growing sport that promotes responsible outdoor use and that the Bay Area as a whole should embrace the recreation desires of its users.

As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thanks for your consideration,
Max Vaillant
Max Vaillant
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1116
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 589
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/10/2022 Have been biking water dog for 26-years and just rode my favorite loop this morning. I strongly support the plan to keep all trails all access, including ebikes as I see the day not far off when I’ll have to switch! Water dog is my favorite place to ride in California. I support the following.

As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come
Frank Babbitt
6/10/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thanks,
Norman
Norman Fong
6/10/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Lencioni Construction Inc
Chad Lencioni
6/10/2022 I’ve read the recently released draft Recreation Use Assessment, and wanted to thank you all for the thoughtful approach to these recommendations. I’m a member of the Waterdog Open Space Stewards and agree with their positions on the recommendations in this draft posted at https://waterdogstewards.com/ articles/update-on-recreation-at-waterdog.

I’m a frequent user of the park, and volunteered when many of the trails we enjoy there were being built.

I’m thrilled at the recommendation to officially recognize the trails that are currently not on the maps, but are well-built and enhance the open space. I also support the erosion remediation recommendations.

I also support the WDOSS position that the trails at Waterdog should remain open (there are no redundant trails!) and multi-use. Waterdog has a wonderful community, and we should continue to embrace and foster it!
Thanks again for your patience and thoughtfulness in this process. I know that the vocal minority who want to shut users out of Waterdog have been loud, and I’m happy to see that they have largely been unsuccessful in their hateful campaign here and at the Cross Country Course. --Scott
Scott Hill
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1117

APPENDIX I
590 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/10/2022 Hi
As a user of the Waterdog open space, (mostly enjoying the space as a responsible mountain biker) I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Regards,
Mark Lefebvre
Mark Lefebvre
6/10/2022 Hi,
I live in Emerald Hills and have been involved with trail building (Lake Loop trail) as well as routine trail maintenance at Waterdog over many years (I started mountain biking at Waterdog in 2006). As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community - me personally included, and I strongly believe that all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I am both a mountain biker and a hiker and I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thank you for your time and effort and support of trail use at Waterdog! Best regards,
Jill Henrich
Jill Henrich
6/10/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space for the past 20 years, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there. I enjoy both biking and hiking with my family and our dog in this park and feel this is a place where we can all enjoy the various recreational opportunities the park has to offer.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Brian Stevenson
San Mateo County Resident
Brian Stevenson
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1118
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 591
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/10/2022 Hello. For the past 30 years or so, I’ve been a user of the Waterdog open space, and I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community (including by myself in years past), and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been. I do oppose the use of e-bikes, as those are more like motorcycles, and do not fit into the people-powered ethos of waterdog, IMO I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy.

Thank you—Tom S, San Carlos CA
Tom S.
6/10/2022 Hello,
As a hiker, dog owner and mountain biker my family and I love and use the Waterdog open space area several times a week.

I am writing to support multi-use recreation on the trails there. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Sincerely,
Rob
Robert Labatt
6/10/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, and bikers, as they always have been. I think that further enforcement of on-leash laws is needed for dog walkers.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. I also agree with allowing e-bikes, as they are limited as to speed and generally do not go any faster than normal bikes.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Nicolas Olivares
6/10/2022 Dear Parks and Rec Commission,
I reviewed the draft Recreation Use Assessment prepared by WRA Consultants for the PROS Plan, and I think overall the consultant’s approach is very balanced and reasonable. For the most part I agree wholeheartedly with their assessments and recommendations, and I think they’re both commonsense and based on solid science.

I disagree with a couple of their recommendations though. WRA recommends making Ensatina trail a hiker-only trail, and the trail known as “”Labor of Love,”” “”Flow,”” and “”Soho Circle”” trail cycling-only. I agree with the comments Commissioner Michaels made at the last P&R Committee meeting, to the effect of “”we should allow as many people as possible to enjoy all of our trails.”” For convenience, the recommendations from the report I’m referring to are pasted here:
”Trail recommendations for designating as single use.

Number 1 on the map below, trail connecting the John Brooks Trail with the Waterdog Lake Loop Trail.

This trail could be a good candidate for designating as pedestrian use only due to the low tree branches and unique shady experience that may encourage slow travel through this area. There are also two parallel trails so access to trailheads would not be restricted. This trail may need additional improvements like realigning trail away from the creek in areas.

Paul Sheng
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1119

APPENDIX I
592 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/10/2022
(con’t)
Number 2 on the map below, loop trail to the south of the John Brooks Trail. This trail could be a good candidate for designating as cycling only due to its winding alignment and banked corners. Because this trail is a loop branching off of the John Brooks Trail, trailhead access would not be restricted. Users of this trail may already be encouraging a single direction of travel (see photo below) which they City may choose to codify and install official signage. However, this decision should rely on assessments of the need for a single direction of travel and visitor surveys.”
Making single-use trails (hiker-only or cycling-only) fosters division and resentment in the trail user community. Belmont doesn’t have a dedicated park ranger, so in designating trails single-use, there’s really no way for the City enforce the rule. It doesn’t make sense to impose a rule that can’t be enforced.

Unfortunately, we have a few unhinged individuals in our community who have been known to physically accost and confront cyclists on the trails. I fear that if trails are designated single-use and a cyclist wanders onto the wrong trail, some self-appointed vigilante enforcer will confront or assault him or her.

Single-use trails are essentially a solution in search of a problem. All of the trails in Waterdog have always been multi-use, and there’s no compelling reason to segregate them. The two trails in question were built by volunteers from the cycling community, not exclusively for themselves, but for everyone to use and enjoy, including hikers, runners, and dog walkers.

The basis for WRA’s recommendation to make Ensatina (Number 2) hiker-only was “the low tree branches and unique shady experience that may encourage slow travel through this area.” This doesn’t seem like a good reason to systematically exclude an entire user group, and break with decades of Belmont’s tradition of allowing all user groups to use and enjoy all the trails.

The federal Bureau of of Land Management has a publication, Guidelines for a Quality Trail Experience, that makes some excellent points about shared multi-use trails:
• Sharing helps build a trail community. Visitors are encouraged to cooperate in order to preserve and protect a common resource, and encountering other types of users on a trail helps to establish mutual respect and inspire courtesy.
• Shared-use trails take better advantage of available space and trail mileage. Quite simply, they provide more trail for everyone to enjoy.
https://www.blm.gov/sites/blm.gov/files/Guidelines-for-a-Quality-Trail-Experience-2017.pdf Ironically, some public commenters at the last P&R meeting were critical of the consultant and Commission for “not bringing the sides together.” However, these same people are demanding single-use trails which literally do the opposite of bringing people together. Sharing is what brings people together, and sharing is what creates a sense of community. That’s always been our tradition and practice, and I hope you will preserve that in the final voting and implementation of our PROS plan.

As always, keep up the great work you’re doing and thank you for taking the time to read my email.

Regards,
Paul Sheng
Paul Sheng
6/10/2022 Hi all,
For the past 15 years my wife and I have enjoyed Waterdog for both hiking and mountain biking. We consistently go hiking there together every week or two, and I have biked there once or twice a week until I retired three years ago, and now I bike at Waterdog three times a week.

I strongly support multi-use access to all the trails, in particular Ensatina and Labor of Love.

These trails both provide unique challenges and joys for both hikers and bikers. I’ve never had a moment of “conflict” on the Labor of Love trail, either with another biker or with a hiker.

I have had moments on the Ensatina trail where I had to yield the right-of-way to an uphill biker, or, as a biker, to a hiker going either direction. In all my interactions on Ensatina, there has never been an uncomfortable moment—I cheerfully and insistently give the right-of-way to all hikers, always encourage them to have a “great hike”, and frequently offer advise on route selection (as someone who has been in Waterdog probably almost 2000 times!).

Michael Wright
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1120
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 593
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/10/2022
(con’t)
I personally see no reason not to keep all trails open to all users. It is true that in our use over 15 years that I have had maybe 4 moments (either as a hiker or a biker) where I felt uncomfortable by the behavior of a mountain biker. Things being what they are, I’ve had at least as many moments where I felt that hikers were discourteous or acted in an unsafe manner. In maybe 2000 times using the resource, this is pretty negligible.

I feel that if anything should be done to make Waterdog more enjoyably and safely usable for all users, it should be an education campaign. The existing signage is useful, but could be made more explicit with regards to right-of-way and suggestions for courteous behavior. I truly think that this would almost completely solve any issues that come from multi-use, and would leave all the trails open to all users.

Thanks you,
Mike Wright
Michael Wright
6/10/2022 Hi,
I live in Redwood City and have been involved with trail building (trail at the end of the dam) as well as routine trail maintenance at Waterdog over many years (I started mountain biking at Waterdog in 2012). As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community - me personally included, and I strongly believe that all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I am both a mountain biker and a hiker and I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thank you for your time and effort and support of trail use at Waterdog! Sincerely,
Pamela James
Pamela James
6/10/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.
-Ryan Hollowell
Ryan Hollowell
6/10/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space for the past three (decades), I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been. While to population has grown over the last e decades the open space has also improved i workers with Passion Trail bikes (Charles ) to help fund , maintain, and build trails for all.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come
Michael Schocket
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1121

APPENDIX I
594 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/10/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Regards,
Sam Chao
Sam Chao
6/10/2022 Dear Belmont City Council,
We are the Stucky family and we live next to Water Dog Park. We enjoy walking with the kids and grandma, running, biking and strolling with our puppy Emil. As users of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

Please keep all the trails open for all of us.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Sincerely, The Stucky Family - Lora, Linda, Lorna, Lyla, Lexy & Paul Lorna Stucky
6/11/2022 Good Morning!
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thank you,
Marc
Marc Siddens
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1122
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 595
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/11/2022 Hello team!
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thanks and best regards :)
Fabio
Fabio Mincone
6/11/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Russell
Russell
6/11/2022 Dear Belmont City Council,
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Brian Bishop
Brian Bishop
6/12/2022 I’m a 63-year-old Mountain Biker/Hiker born and raised in the area. My wife and I, our children, and our grandchild have been using the Waterdog open space for over 40 years. I support the multi-use recreation on the trails there. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been. I’m seeing better communication than ever between Hikers and Mountain Bikers on the trails.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. All the trails should be available for all user groups to enjoy.

Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision-making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Regards,
Chuck Spiteri
Chuck Spiteri
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1123

APPENDIX I
596 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/12/2022 I’ve been biking amd hiking at Waterdog park for 15 years and have always been impressed by how well everyone gets along. I wish there were more such areas in the Bay Area.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space.

Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users. - Bob Estes
Bob Estes
6/12/2022 Hello,
Please maintain access to waterdog for cyclists. These trails are well built, have a ton of amazing history, and enable low-cost recreation for anyone with shoes or a bicycle. Belmont should expand and embrace this regional gem.

Thank you for your consideration,
Ryan Kauffman
20+ year user of WaterDog (arriving by bike, not car)
Ryan Kauffman
6/12/2022 Dear Belmont City Council,
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails and leave them open to all users.

On a personal note, my 65 year old father and I (39) have greatly enjoyed riding e-mountain bikes (eMTB) at Waterdog. Waterdog is one of the only parks on the mid-peninsula that allows eMTBs and it is a game changer for my dad who can ride single track again. Being able to relive the nostalgia of my childhood by riding bikes with my dad is truly special, and I have Waterdog’s support for multi-use recreation to thank for that.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Sincerely,
Nolan Nichols
Nolan Nichols
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1124
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 597
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/12/2022 Hello,
I lived in Belmont for many years and enjoyed hiking and biking in Waterdog park and continue to do so. It’s great fun to go for a ride there and then have dinner at the Waterdog Tavern afterwards. I have also been involved with trail maintenance there starting in 2005.

As a user of the Waterdog open space, I support multi-use recreation on the trails there. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, including me, and I strongly believe that all trails there should continue to be available for everyone to enjoy as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I am both a mountain biker and a hiker and I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy.

Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thank you for your time and effort and support for trail use at Waterdog! Best regards,
Sally Schroeter
Sally Schroeter
6/12/2022 Dear Belmont City Council,
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails and leave them open to all users.

On a personal note, my 65 year old father and I (39) have greatly enjoyed riding e-mountain bikes (eMTB) at Waterdog. Waterdog is one of the only parks on the mid-peninsula that allows eMTBs and it is a game changer for my dad who can ride single track again. Being able to relive the nostalgia of my childhood by riding bikes with my dad is truly special, and I have Waterdog’s support for multi-use recreation to thank for that.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Sincerely,
Nolan Nichols
Peter Salkowski
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1125

APPENDIX I
598 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/12/2022 Hi Robin and John (please forward this email to Robin),

1. I couldn’t agree more with WRA assessments that visitors to San Mateo County parks as well as Belmont Open Spaces reported walking/hiking and running are the predominant reasons for their visits while a much smaller proportion reported biking as their reason. This clearly indicates that OSMP should be focusing more on Pedestrians than currently is the case and WRA’s recommendation to “designate trails as single use to improve feelings of safety by increasing predictability by allowing activity type” should be implemented. All visitors can share all trails but bike speeding is not appropriate use on narrow trails which should be reserved for purposes of “exercising, communing with nature and experiencing peace and quiet” No amount of passive bells, loaner bells, proper etiquette and signage will improve the pedestrian safety when mountain bikes speed past at 30 mph and take away from the natural experience of peace and quiet and improvement of mental well-being.

Just on Canyon Creek alone, over 40% of Strava bikers report an average speed of 15-27mph on the entire trail while over 90% report maximum speeds up to 30 mph on portions of the trail putting pedestrian safety at risk with absolutely no peace or quiet.

ED - Speed Distribution Strava.jpg

2. I vehemently disagree with designating Soho (labour of love), a previously unmapped trail as a one way bike trail. This is legally in flagrant violation of the John Brooks Preserve donation contract to preserve it in its natural state. For WRA to recommend that this unauthorized, unmapped trail be legalized for bikers only (no hikers) is a contradiction to their recommendation that previously unmapped trails (which have the highest number of categories of erosion) should be decommissioned or closed. Bikers want this trail as a one way downhill trail for speed racing, an active and competitive sport; hardly passive recreation. It sets a very bad precedent for allowing bikers to continue to build illegal, unmapped trails in anticipation they will be approved in the future. The Soho trail should be decommissioned and closed.

3. I agree that Waterdog has the highest trail density per acre at .04 miles per acre for both mapped and unmapped trails. It has 2.5 times the trail density of other local comparable small preserves which contributes to erosion, fragmented habitat and disruption of wildlife. Waterdog is already overbuilt with mapped and unmapped trails.

4. I agree with the use of remote motion activated cameras for gathering more data and information regarding pedestrian and cyclist activities, monitoring wildlife and monitoring a maximum 15 mph speed limit for cyclists. This additional data will be helpful in providing missing information to P&R for a complete analysis of the Open Spaces.

5. I disagree with E-bike approval for Waterdog as WRA failed to acknowledge that different classes of E-bikes are visually impossible to distinguish: therefore allowing Class 1 E-bikes means allowing ALL classes of E-bikes. The higher classes have larger, heavier motors and wider tires that will damage trails as their report clearly states that “”motorized trails experience most soil loss and erosion””. There is no need to authorize E-bikes when they currently already violate our open spaces!

6. I agree with passive recreation ideas such as P&R sponsored nature photography contests (particularly for kids), nature-led walks identifying vegetation and wildlife and weekly hiking trips by trail; all are ideas that support the predominant reasons why visitors visit our Open Spaces.

Thank you for your attention.

Jennifer Lien
Jennifer Lien
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1126
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 599
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/12/2022 Good afternoon,
I live in San Mateo near Hillsdale High school and have been involved with trail building (Berry trail) as well as routine trail maintenance at Waterdog over many years. As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails. Waterdog has given us hours of mother-son times, enjoying the outdoors on our bikes, building skills, starting from our front door. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, me personally included, and I strongly believe that all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for. The exceptions would be any trail closures and the singleuse designation of two trails in the open space. I am a mountain biker, hiker and dog walker and I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy and that we need to respect the different user groups and use it with tolerance and harmony.

Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thank you for your time and effort and support of trail use at Waterdog! Sincerely
Lotti Dunbar
Lotti Dunbar
6/12/2022 Dear Belmont City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission and PROS committee I am a resident of Belmont for over 30 years, and have enjoyed the Belmont Open Spaces over all of that time. Hiking, Running, and Biking in those spaces has been an incredible experience for me. Over those years, I believe the conditions of Waterdog Open Space have improved greatly. I have been attending Parks and Recreation Commission meetings for the past couple of years, and have heard all the arguments over and over again.

With the publication of the Draft Report, we have an unbiased appraisal of the condition of the Open Spaces and some recommendations for improvement going forward. This document, along with the results of the survey taken earlier in the planning process, and the results of the past city council election all point to the following conclusions:

The open spaces are in very good condition, though there is room for improvement Wildlife are generally in good condition in the open spaces People really enjoy the opportunity to make use of the open space Restrictions on biking in the open spaces are opposed by a large majority of the public (data from the survey and results of the last city council election)
Trails should be multi-use and we should encourage all to use the resources Some improvements mentioned in the Draft Report, including closure of the highly eroded “”fall line”” section on Rambler, and improving the riparian crossings with bridges, make a lot of sense to me. I hope that they will be implemented.

I was heartened to hear several Park and Recreation Commissioners voice support for keeping the trails multi-use. This seems very much in line with the values of the Belmont community. The draft report does endorse making one trail one-way bike only and one trail hiking only. I think this is a recommendation that should not be implemented. Starting to designate trails as accessible to one group and not another is counter to the inclusiveness we strive to maintain in Belmont. Also, once this president is set, I can imagine a never-ending series of calls for evermore restrictive policies in the future. While this suggestion may appear to be a fair one-for-one trade, I do believe it would be a mistake to implement it.

There was also a vague recommendation to close “”redundant”” trails. I’m not sure this is a good idea either. In some instances having more than one way to walk or bike may enhance the experience for all.

We will see different things on different trails, and spreading out the users over more trails can make the trip more enjoyable for all.

There has been a lot of work done to get to where we are today. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Parks and Recreation Commissioners for their service to the community. I am hopeful that we can come away with a Master Plan that will continue to keep the Open Spaces great places for everyone to enjoy over the coming years.

Respectfully,
Michael Munrow
Michael Munrow
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1127

APPENDIX I
600 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/12/2022 Dear Belmont City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission and PROS committee I am a resident of Belmont for over 30 years, and have enjoyed the Belmont Open Spaces over all of that time. Hiking, Running, and Biking in those spaces has been an incredible experience for me. Over those years, I believe the conditions of Waterdog Open Space have improved greatly. I have been attending Parks and Recreation Commission meetings for the past couple of years, and have heard all the arguments over and over again.

With the publication of the Draft Report, we have an unbiased appraisal of the condition of the Open Spaces and some recommendations for improvement going forward. This document, along with the results of the survey taken earlier in the planning process, and the results of the past city council election all point to the following conclusions:

The open spaces are in very good condition, though there is room for improvement Wildlife are generally in good condition in the open spaces People really enjoy the opportunity to make use of the open space Restrictions on biking in the open spaces are opposed by a large majority of the public (data from the survey and results of the last city council election)
Trails should be multi-use and we should encourage all to use the resources Some improvements mentioned in the Draft Report, including closure of the highly eroded “”fall line”” section on Rambler, and improving the riparian crossings with bridges, make a lot of sense to me. I hope that they will be implemented.

I was heartened to hear several Park and Recreation Commissioners voice support for keeping the trails multi-use. This seems very much in line with the values of the Belmont community. The draft report does endorse making one trail one-way bike only and one trail hiking only. I think this is a recommendation that should not be implemented. Starting to designate trails as accessible to one group and not another is counter to the inclusiveness we strive to maintain in Belmont. Also, once this president is set, I can imagine a never-ending series of calls for evermore restrictive policies in the future. While this suggestion may appear to be a fair one-for-one trade, I do believe it would be a mistake to implement it.

There was also a vague recommendation to close “”redundant”” trails. I’m not sure this is a good idea either. In some instances having more than one way to walk or bike may enhance the experience for all.

We will see different things on different trails, and spreading out the users over more trails can make the trip more enjoyable for all.

There has been a lot of work done to get to where we are today. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Parks and Recreation Commissioners for their service to the community. I am hopeful that we can come away with a Master Plan that will continue to keep the Open Spaces great places for everyone to enjoy over the coming years.

Respectfully,
Michael Munrow
Rob Anagnoson
6/13/2022 I am reaching out to you as an avid user of the Waterdog open space area. I’d like to share my position to continue to support the multi-use recreation for all of the trails for all types of users to enjoy. I am also an advocate for the Waterdog Open Space Stewards and appreciate the policies that have been established for the well being of this area and the community.

I ask that you please reconsider the proposal of certain trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails included in the open space. I would very much like to see this trail system, that was built and is being maintained by the community, remain open on a fully inclusive basis for all hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy.

I look forward to enjoying this open space with all of my various community members for many years to come.

Respectfully,
Chris Miller
Chris Miller
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1128
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 601
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/13/2022 As a resident of Belmont living in the Belmont Heights neighborhood and frequent user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there. I regularly hike, bird watch and explore nature in the Waterdog OS and occasionally bike the trails. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Regards,
Karen Moody
Karen Moody
6/13/2022 I’m hoping to attend the open house this evening at Waterdog/Hidden Canyon. However, if I don’t get a chance to speak, I want to get some of my thoughts out in advance.

I’ve been enjoying Waterdog for close to 20 years, and a resident of San Mateo for a little over 10 years.

In those 20 years, I’ve worked with Charles Jalgunas and Patti Ciesla (formerly of Passion Trail Bikes) and now the Trail Stewards of Waterdog during many trailwork days. One of the projects I’m most proud of is helping Patti construct the new lake loop trail, bringing my son on several occasions when he was maybe 3-5 years old. He’s 14 now, and just finished his freshman year at Serra HS.

During the pandemic, we got much more involved in mountain biking as a safe, social outdoor activity and found the Woodside Beasts. What we found with the Woodside Beasts was such a welcoming group who are passionate about the outdoors. Kids of all types and abilities are welcomed with open arms and provided the opportunity to enjoy many of the parks and open spaces in the Bay Area, incentivizing them to get outside and off of their devices. For me, this was so important during the pandemic, and will continue to be a great life lesson moving forward.

Sadly, it appears there are a small, very vocal minority that are trying to limit access to trails for cycling in Waterdog. I’ve seen first hand how these teens and pre-teens have fallen in love with being outside, meeting new friends, and learning new life skills (first aid, trail maintenance, philanthropy, civic duty, etc.).

However, there are people in our community that brand these kids as criminals or outlaws, and portray them in a negative light. That message can’t be further from the truth. What infuriates me is that during a trail maintenance day, working alongside the Belmont Parks and Rec, the neighbors called the police on us (and the kids). It was so frustrating trying to explain to my son why the police were questioning the work we were doing, and that it was approved by the city.

How can the city help change the neighborhood’s perception of these young kids? They spend countless hours working to maintain trail systems and better communities from San Francisco down to Santa Cruz, only to be told they aren’t welcome and are often scolded on the same trails they help maintain.

Please keep Waterdog open to all users. It’s such a beautiful space that should remain accessible for everyone to enjoy.

Kind regards,
Matt Leonard
Matt Leonard
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1129

APPENDIX I
602 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/13/2022 Council Members,
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I support multi-use recreation on the trails there. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Jamie Morgan
Jamie Morgan
6/13/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thanks,
Thad
Thad Trent
6/13/2022 I regularly use Waterdog open space, so wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

Specifics to your draft recommendations:

I do not support the restriction to hiking only on Ensatina Trail, the low hanging tree cover is a uniquely beautiful charm that my soul loves. I choose to enjoy while riding my bike, and would deeply like to continue to use this trail.

I do not support changing Labor of Love into a bike only trail, it too has a really fun, low tree cover, but maily oak trees that I love. Please leave this open to all users. I do support making this trail one-direction only.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Best regards,
Ryan
Ryan Fell
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1130
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 603
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/13/2022 Dear Community Officials,
I bike in Waterdog park approximately three days a week year around. It is an amazing multi-use park that needs to remain accessible to all. I wear bells on my bikes and always yield to others on the trails and have had no issues with walkers, runners, etc. I’ve found people to be very hospitable, especially when bikers are careful and thoughtful like most are.

As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Kind regards,
David Johnson
David Johnson
6/13/2022 To whom it may concern,
As a local resident and frequent user of the Waterdog open space, I strongly support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all the trails should continue to be available for hikers, dog walkers, and cyclists to enjoy equally.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exception that I am opposed to any trail closures and to the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. All the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy.

Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

Thanks,
Chris Strahorn
Chris Stranhorn
6/13/2022 Hello,
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision-making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Sincerely,
Miro Miklos
Miro Miklos
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1131

APPENDIX I
604 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/14/2022 To Belmont City Council,
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Best,
Devin Sezgen
Devin Sezgen
6/14/2022 Dear Belmont Parks and Recreation, and City Council, I know you’re in the planning stages of the open space master plan for Belmont Parks and recreation for the next 15 years, and as an avid mountain biker in the community I appreciate the opportunity to share my feedback.

My name is Reid Brozek. I’m a 17 year-old mountain biker, and live 3 miles from Waterdog Lake Park. I have been riding at Waterdog for over 5 years, on average about 2 times per week.

My first experiences at Waterdog was when I was completely new to the sport at around age 13. One day when my friends and I were at Waterdog trying to learn skills on the trails. One day around this time, three mountain bikers came down the trail. They were members of the Woodside Beasts, a local mountain biking team. The coach, Jarrod Ristow, made a friendly introduction and let us know about the team. I later joined, and so much of my positive mountain biking experiences and beyond have come from my development with the Beast organization, including the team practices at Waterdog Lake Park.

Throughout my years with the Woodside Beasts, I have learned many aspects of trail riding etiquette that I follow and role model at Waterdog. These include being respectful to people passing by, letting our group know when we pass a group of hikers or fellow bikers by saying “hiker” or “rider” up, giving the right of way to people going up the trail, and pulling off to the side when there are larger groups of people.

In addition, as part of the Woodside Beasts, the team organizes trail maintenance days at Waterdog, where we go out and clear the trail of debris including litter and we repair hazardous sections of the trail. These volunteer efforts improve the riding experience at Waterdog Lake Park for all riders, and also provide fun bonding time for the team, and instill a sense of pride in our sport.

Some of the best aspects of riding at Waterdog are the short climbs, the technical sections on trails like Rambler, and how Waterdog is a multi-use space. But the very best thing about Waterdog is its location, because it is the only place with this size and type of terrain on the mid peninsula.

I urge the City of Belmont, when considering their Open Space Master Plan, to preserve all existing trails at Waterdog and restore trails that have been recently blocked.

The second issue I want to raise is the development of a pump track. In the Draft Reccommendations for the Open Space Master Plan, the addition of a pump track was among the top amenities requested by the community. Currently, the closest pump track is in San Jose.

A pump track in Belmont would have supported the development of my biking skills as a new rider, and I would still enjoy it today as an experienced rider. I want to advocate for younger riders in my community to give them opportunities when I was starting out. A pump track in Belmont would provide opportunities for people to get outside and be more active.

Sincerely,
Reid Brozek
Reid Brozek
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1132
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 605
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/14/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Sincerely,
Mike Barad
Mike Barad
6/15/2022 Hello,
I am writing in support of multi-use recreation on the trails at the Waterdog open space. The trail system was built, and continues to be maintained, by the entire community. All trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been. The singular group that is trying to change and remove access to the park for a much broader segment of multiple user groups is a niche segment of the community that does not represent the actual diverse population of Belmont and the broader population that enjoys Waterdog. Please keep this in mind when making a decision that could potentially prevent children, adults and families from enjoying this park as they have been, for generations to come.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thanks,
Justin Carr
Justin Carr
6/15/2022 Dear Belmont City Council,
As a local who was raised in Belmont (Fox Elementary, Ralston Middle School, Carlmont High School), a current local resident in neighboring San Carlos and as a lifetime time user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there. I was first introduced to Waterdog open space by my parents in the mid-1970s as we would enjoy weekly family hikes. As I grew older, I started riding the Waterdog trails and have enjoyed them for over 30 years! I am now a father and enjoy the same hiking and riding with my own family that I grew to love over the years. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been for as long as I can remember! I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Regards,
Matt Herman
Matt Herman
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1133

APPENDIX I
606 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/15/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Sincerely,
Chuck Becker
Chuck Becker
6/15/2022 Dear Parks & Recreation Commission,
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thank you very much for your attention in this matter!
Peter
Peter Coward
6/16/2022 Hello,
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thank you
Lindsay
Lindsay Helmuth
6/16/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thank you, Eduardo
Eduardo Llach
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1134
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 607
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/16/2022 As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.
-Shelby Golan
Shelby Golan
6/17/2022 Hello Belmont/Waterdog decision-makers,
Please retain multi-use trails at Waterdog. I have ridden my mountain bike at Waterdog for years. It is truly a great park to ride and wouldn’t want it to change in any way, if possible. I know that mountain biking has become more popular in recent years and amidst the pandemic, and this has brought new users to the park, and possibly some riff-raff.

Here is the copy/paste version:

As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Regards,
Jonathan Lamb
Johnathan Lamb
6/17/2022 Hello,
As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thank you,
Susannah Calvin
Susannah Calvin
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1135

APPENDIX I
608 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
6/17/2022 Dear Belmont City Council and PROS Commission, I am a frequent user of Waterdog open space, and I support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been. I also support the use of e-bikes there and don’t see them as making any impact on the trails or other users due to their quiet operation and very low power compared to a dirt bike.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Sincerely,
Joel Wilson“
Joel Wilson
6/19/2022 Hello,
As Belmont resident and an avid user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write in support of multi-use recreation of the trails in Water dog. The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog. I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards and agree with the draft recommendations published recently with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. I’ve been hiking and biking in Water dog for over a decade hand never felt a situation where trails had to be restricted for enjoying a nice outdoors.

In the decade we have been living in Belmont, we love the city for all it has to offer. I am committed to doing my part to make Water Open Space safe an inclusive to all.

Please leave all trails in the park open to all users. I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Best Regards
Tushar
Tushar Nair
6/21/2022 Hello Belmont,
Waterdog was the origin of a great ride tradition where I formed some of the best friendships in my life.

As a user of the Waterdog open space, I wanted to write to support multi-use recreation on the trails there.

The trail system was built and is maintained by the community, and all trails there should continue to be available for hikers, bikers, and dog walkers to enjoy, as they always have been.

I support the Waterdog Open Space Stewards, and agree that the draft recommendations published recently are what the community is asking for, with the exceptions of any trail closures and the single-use designation of two trails in the open space. I feel that all the trails should be open for all user groups to enjoy. Thank you for using a scientific approach to policy making in Waterdog; please apply the same kind of data-based decision making to these two trails, and leave them open to all users.

I look forward to Belmont having a fully inclusive recreation plan for Waterdog that will keep it a great place for all users to enjoy for years to come.

Thank you,
Brook
Brook Burley
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1136
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 609
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
7/1/2022 Dear Commissioners and Councilmembers,
An article in the San Francisco Chronicle (Electric bicycle ban on trails staying put--Per report, e-bikes could impact safety and environment) was brought to my attention today. I have copied some pertinent information regarding this decision, which I think is relevant to the Waterdog Open Space here in Belmont.

Yes—some regions have opened up trails to e-bikes, but I think there is a big difference between recreational areas or parks, which have the primary purpose of recreation, and nature preserves with a primary purpose of preserving the natural environment. Below are quotes taken from the article. I added italics to emphasize the last statement.
“Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District voted to uphold its ban on e-bikes on the majority of its trails.” “Observing that e-bike use has exploded in the region, the district undertook a thorough two-year policy review that looked at the potential impacts of allowing e-bikes on its nature preserves. In an exhaustive report, the authors assessed noise impacts to nearby bat populations, potentially excessive uphill speeds, fire risk, soil impacts, and the potential for conflicts among e-bikers and other visitors.” “The four directors who voted to keep the ban largely in place noted that Midpen’s mission is to balance healthy natural ecosystems with agricultural and recreational uses and view its preserves as distinct from parklands in that way.”
“’What I want to emphasize is our job is to properly care for nature preserves, and it’s a very different approach required by agencies that are managing parks,” said Midpen Director Curt Riffle. “I’ve concluded that I just cannot support allowing motorized or motor-assisted bicycles into our preserves.’ Director Karen Holman echoed that rationale, describing possible unknown negative impacts to wildlife wrought by e-bike riders who might venture down Midpen trails farther and faster than mountain bikers.” “Overall, directors expressed trepidation about a lack of scientific research on e-bike impacts in natural areas. ‘One consideration … is that based on our past history, once a use is allowed in an area, it becomes more difficult to restrict that use if we find that negative impacts are indeed occurring,’ said Midpen General Manager Ana María Ruiz.”
This last point is critical to consider in the implementation of a pilot policy, as suggested on page xvi of the draft Open Space Master Plan. Also, it is apparent to me that opening up trails to e-bikes is not required to adhere to ADA regulations, given that the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District voted to uphold its ban.

Thank you for your careful consideration of this issue as you move forward.

Regards,
Connie Tettenborn
Connie
Tettenborn
DRAFT | Final February 2024
DRAFT Received Emails
1137

APPENDIX I
610 PARKS | RECREATION | OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN APPENDICES EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
7/3/2022 Hi Brigitte,
I want to call your attention to three significant errors on the PROS Drafts released June 28, 2022. These are not differences of opinion, but factual errors. I respectfully request these errors be corrected prior to submission of the drafts to City Council, and that these corrections be conveyed to the Commission in the July 6 discussion on the topic. I would greatly appreciate an e-mail acknowledgement of receipt of this notice, and confirmation that the errors will be corrected.

Thank you,
Kristin Mercer
Unauthorized Trails incorrectly identified as authorized (WRA Draft Final Open Space, pg. 6 and 20) On the WRA trail maps, six illegal trails are mis-labeled as authorized (solid black line). As you can see on the most recent City trail map below, these trails are NOT authorized and were not approved by the City for good reasons:

Ralston School – poses a security risk to students, was steep and badly eroded. This trail was closed by City actions in 2021.

Berry shortcut to Brooks – dangerously steep, redundant because it connects two trails that intersect just a few yards to the east
Chaparral to Brooks at Highlands Court – redundant because it connects two trails that intersect at the Somerset entrance, dangerously steep and eroded, bisecting chaparral habitat.

Elevator down to Chaparral – dangerously steep and eroded 2 ft ditch, causing widening yearly, bisecting chaparral habitat.

From Ohlone to Ohlone – redundant, dangerous slope and cross slope with trail width less than 1 foot, undermined roots and killed two previously healthy oaks, bisecting sensitive oak and fern forest and introducing invasive species.

Hastings Drive to Upper Creek – redundant, dangerously steep, highly eroded and widened beyond 10 feet.

Many of these trails were identified by residents in 2020 when the City was asked, and promised, to close them. Ralston trail was closed at that time. Ohlone appeared in 2020-21. Hastings has been closed or notused for many years.

Taken together these mistakenly mapped trails add to about a mile. On top of these we have the 1.5 miles of illegal trails in the Brooks Preserve (not shown here). All totaled, illegal trails account for an added ~20% more trail miles than the City acknowledges.

None of these trails have trail signage because the 2020 Trail Signage Committee acknowledged that these are NOT official trails. Illegal trails are a significant management issue that is totally omitted from the WRA assessment and recommendations, and should be documented as an area of focus.

There is no justification for sanctioning these dangerous, redundant, unsustainable, unplanned and illegally created trails. Please revise the WRA maps to remove these trails. And again, please take action to close these illegal trails.

E-bike policy -MidPen Open Space does not permit e-bikes (WRA Draft Final Open Space, pg.43) The WRA Draft Open Space Management Plan implies, on pg 43, that MidPen is poised to permit e-bikes on trails. In fact, at their June 29 meeting the MidPen board voted to ban e-bikes from narrow natural surface trails. This decision was based on an exhaustive study of impacts and policies of other open space stewardship agencies. It is thus reflective of the emerging “best practices” in light of the rapidly evolving e-technologies and growing use impacts from bike activity. The WRA draft needs to convey this recent ruling and correctly assess this emerging policy trend in order to avoid misleading Belmont decisionmakers.

Pg 43. “More recently, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) -which does not allow e-bikes on trails - commissioned a set of studies to investigate visitor perceptions and ecological impacts of e-bikes. A report on these studies to the Board of Directors submitted in March, 2022 included a recommendation that e-bikes be allowed wherever bikes were allowed (Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, 2022), however, the matter remains under consideration by the District at the time of this report writing.”
Attached is a recent Chronicle news article on the ruling, and you can also view the MidPen meeting online to verify this report (minutes not yet published). https://www.openspace.org/about-us/meetings/bod20220629 Kristin Mercer
DRAFT | Final February 2024

APPENDIX I DRAFT
1138
Received Emails
CITY OF BELMONT | LET’S BUILD OUR BACKYARD 611
EMAILS RECEIVED: [email protected]

DATE COMMENT COMMENTER
7/3/2022
(con’t)
Errors on Figure ES-3 Park Access Radii Map (Gates Belmont PROS Plan Final Draft, pg.xi) The Park Access Radii map on the PROS PLAN FINAL page xi incorrectly identifies six Neighborhood Parks as Community Parks (shaded teal instead of green). Park typology does not change on account of access radii. Despite the fact that these parks serve a larger neighborhood, they are still neighborhood parks, not intended to provide amenities to serve the entire community. Misrepresenting the type classifications will lead to decisions adversely impacting those neighborhoods and overburdening the area.

Please change the key-colors of the following parks to indicate they are Neighborhood parks (green), not Community parks (teal). The KEY for this graphic lacks the Community Park (orange dot) identifier. The Undeveloped parks (blue dot on the KEY) do not appear on the map.

Kristin Mercer
7/3/2022 Dear Brigitte, Park and Rec, City Council and PROS, As reported in WRA’s final draft Open Space Management Plan (OSMP) the majority of visitors to open spaces seek nature:
“exercising, communing with nature and experiencing peace and quiet” was cited in the 2021 Belmont survey as the leading purpose of visiting the Open Space. “walking, hiking and running while a much smaller proportion reported biking” was also the response to a survey of visitors to San Mateo County parks.

Yet in Belmont’s Waterdog, these purposes have been totally reversed with biking now the predominant activity, preventing residents and others from walking, hiking and running in peace and quiet, and communing with nature. The PROS guiding principles call for equity and inclusiveness, but currently the majority of residents are denied equitable access and inclusion; they don’t feel welcome and safe and don’t feel that their health and well being are advanced.

Bikers have argued that pedestrians are equally welcome to use the narrow trails and insist they are inclusive, but this argument is disingenuous because bikes on trails meant for hiking are forcing foot traffic out of Waterdog. We have an exclusionary, regional bike-dominated destination. By creating dangers to pedestrians with competitive speeding up to 30 mph on the curves of narrow trails; seeking ever steeper slopes and jumps for excitement, and building berms around narrow curves for enhanced speed they have scared away neighbors with small children, driven away avid senior hikers and created an environment of fear of walking in Waterdog. And this exodus is being encouraged by a San Mateo bike leader’s audacious public comments telling Belmont residents to go take a hike elsewhere other than Waterdog (click video link).
https://mega.nz/file/asxDTBDK#bwOhYtyDj9uiPYbQBl3vpGMY27wOLjz03N4zNUXw1LU Let’s be honest; no amount of “trail calming features” (bells, greetings, flat landings, slower speeds, reminder signs) will be enforceable and none of them will improve biker/hiker compatibility. Hikers walking at 1-5 mph seeking peace and quiet cannot compete with speeding 2- wheel machinery traveling up to 30 mph, whizzing past within inches on a 3-foot wide trail. This is neither safe nor conducive to either user group attempting to enjoy Waterdog, and is an accident waiting to happen.