Agenda packet — Carson City Council, May 6, 2025 (part 4 of 5)

5.3 Indemnification.

Contractor shall indemnify, defend with legal counsel approved by City, and hold harmless City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers (each, an “Indemnitee”) from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable legal counsel fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Contractor's performance of work under this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except such loss or damage which is caused by the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Should conflict of interest principles preclude a single legal counsel from representing both City and Contractor, or should City otherwise find Contractor’s legal counsel unacceptable, then Contractor shall reimburse the City its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable legal counsels fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. The Contractor shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) with respect to claims determined by a trier of fact to have been the resu lt of the Contractor’s negligent, reckless or wrongful performance. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.
-17-
01007.0006/1060572.1
Contractor obligations under this section apply regardless of whether or not such claim, charge, damage, demand, action, proceeding, loss, stop notice, cost, expense, judgment, civil fine or penalty, or liability was caused in part or contributed to by an Indemnitee. However, without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this Agreement, Contractor shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City for liability attributable to the active negligence of City, provided such active negligence is determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. In instances where City is shown to have been actively negligent and where City’s active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the obligation of Contractor will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the active negligence of City.

5.4 Notification of Third-Party Claims.

City shall timely notify Contractor of the receipt of any third- party claim relating to the work under this Agreement. City shall be entitled to recover from Contractor its reasonable costs incurred in providing such notification.

5.5 Performance and Payment Bonds.

Concurrently with execution of this Agreement , Contractor shall deliver to the City all of the following bonds if the Contract Sum should exceed $25,000:
(a) A performance bond securing the faithful performance of this Agreement, in an amount not less than 100% of the total compensation for this Agreement, as stated in Section

2.1. (b) A payment bond, securing the payment of all persons furnishing labor and/or materials in connection with the work under this Agreement, in an amount not less than 100% of the total compensation for this Agreement, as stated in Section 2.1.

All bonds shall be on the applicable forms provided in Exhibit “C” and Exhibit “D” attached hereto and made part hereof. The bonds shall each contain the original notarized signature of an authorized officer of the surety and affixed thereto shall be a certified and current copy of his/her power of attorney. The bonds shall be unconditional and remain in force during the entire term of the Agreement until released pursuant to Section 5.7 hereof.

5.6 Sufficiency of Insurer or Surety.

Insurance and bonds required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by companies qualified to do business in California, rated “A-” or better in the most recent edition of Best’s Rating Guide, The Key Rating Guide or in the Federal Register, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better. If the City determines that the work to be performed under this Agreement creates an increased or decreased risk of loss to the City, the Contractor agrees that the minimum limits of the insurance policies and the bonds may be changed accordingly upon receipt of written notice from the City’s Risk Manager.

5.7 Release of Securities.
-18-
01007.0006/1060572.1
City shall release the performance bond and payment bond when the following have occurred:
(a) Contractor has made a written request for release and provided evidence of satisfaction of all other requirements under Article 5 of this Agreement; (b) the Project has been accepted; and
(c) after passage of the time within which lien claims are required to be made pursuant to applicable laws; if lien claims have been timely filed, City shall hold the payment bond until such claims have been resolved, Contractor has provided statutory bond, or otherwise as required by applicable law.

ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

6.1 Records.

Contractor shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies, certified and accurate copies of payroll records in compliance with all applicable laws, or other documents r elating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Project Manager to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Project Manager shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of 3 years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required.

In the event of dissolution of Contractor’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Contractor ’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act.

6.2 Reports.

Contractor shall periodically prepare and submit to the Project Manager such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Project Manager shall require. Contractor hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Contractor agrees that if Contractor becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein , Contractor shall promptly notify the Project Manager of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto. -19-
01007.0006/1060572.1

6.3 Ownership of Documents.

All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “ documents and materials”) prepared by Contractor, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Project Manager or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Contractor shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Contractor will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Contractor, and Contractor ’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment. Contractor may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Contractor shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Contractor fails to secure such assignment, Contractor shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Contractor with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City.

6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.
(a) Information gained or work product produced by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Contractor. Contractor shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Project Manager.
(b) Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Project Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Contractor, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Contractor for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys’ fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor’s conduct. (d) Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admiss ions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by -20-
01007.0006/1060572.1
Contractor. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT ; DEFAULT , SUSPENSION AND

TERMINATION

7.1 California Law.

This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Contractor covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California.

7.2 Default of Contractor.

Contractor’s failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate or suspend this Agreement immediately by written notice to Contractor. If the Project Manager determines that Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, the Project Manager shall cause to be served upon Contractor a written notice of the default. Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

7.3 Suspension and Termination.
(a) The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends a portion of this Agreement such suspension shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. (b) This Agreement may be terminated by either party for cause. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause upon thirty (30) days’ written notice of termination. Upon termination, Contractor shall be entitled to compensation for completion of any portion of the Project accepted by City up to the effective date of termination unless any portion of the Project is accepted by City after termination in which event Contractor shall be paid for such completed portion.
-21-
01007.0006/1060572.1

7.4 Dispute Resolution Process.

Section 20104 et seq. of the California Public Contract Code prescribes a process utilizing informal co nferences, non -binding judicial -supervised mediation, and judicial arbitration to resolve disputes on construction claims of $375,000 or less. Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code prescribes a process for negotiation and mediation to resolve disputes on construction claims.

The intent of this Section is to implement Sections 20104 et seq. and Section 9204 of the California Public Contract Code. This Section shall be construed to be consistent with said statutes.

For purposes of these procedures, “claim ” means a separate demand by the Contractor, after the City has denied Contractor’s timely and duly made request for payment for ext ra work and/or a time extension, for (A) a time extension, (B) payment of money or damages arising from work done by or on behalf of the Contractor pursuant to the Agreement and payment of which is not otherwise expressly provided for or the Contractor is not otherwise entitled to, or (C) an amount the payment of which is disputed by the City.

The following requirements apply to all claims to which this section applies:
(a) Claim Submittal. The claim shall be in writing and include the documents necessary to substantiate the claim. Claims governed by this procedure must be filed on or before the date of final payment. Nothing in this section is intended to extend the time limit or supersede notice requirements otherwise provided in the Agreement for the filing of claims, including all requirements pertaining to compensation or payment for extra work, disputed work, and/or changed conditions. Failure to follow such contract ual requirements shall bar any claims or subsequent lawsuits for compensation or payment thereon. (b) S
upporting Documentation. The Contractor shall submit all claims in the following format:
(i) Summary of the claim, including references to the specific Contract Document provisions upon which the claim is based.
(ii) List of documents relating to claim: (a) Specifications, (b) Drawings, (c) Clarifications (Requests for Information), (d) Schedules, and (e) Other. (iii) Chronology of events and correspondence related to the claim. (iv) Statement of grounds for the claim.
(v) Analysis of the claim’s cost, if any.
(vi) Analysis of the claim’s time/schedule impact, if any. (c) City’s Response. Upon receipt of a claim pursuant to this section, City shall conduct a reasonable review of the claim and, within a period not to exceed 45 days, shall provide the Contractor a written statement identifying what portion of the claim is disputed and what portion is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim will be processed and made within 60 days after the City issues its written statement. -22-
01007.0006/1060572.1
(i) If the City needs approval from the City Council to provide the Contractor a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion of the claim, and the City Council does not meet within the 45 days or within the mutually agreed to extension of time following receipt of a claim sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, the City shall have up to three days following the next duly publicly noticed meeting of the City Council after the 45-day period, or extension, expires to provide the Contractor a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion. (ii) Within 30 days of receipt of a claim, the City may request in writing additional documentation supporting the claim or relating to defenses or claims the City may have against the Contractor. If additional information is thereafter required, it shall be re quested and provided pursuant to this subdivision, upon mutual agreement of City and the Contractor. (iii) The City’s written response to the claim, as further documented, shall be submitted to the Contractor within 30 days (if the claim is less than $50,000, within 15 days) after receipt of the further documentation, or within a period of time no greater than that taken by the Contractor in producing the additional information or requested documentation, whichever is greater.
(d) Meet and Confer. If the Contractor disputes the City’s written response, or the City fails to respond within the time prescribed, the Contractor may so notify the City, in writing, either within 15 days of receipt of the City’s response or within 15 days of the City’s failure to respond within the time prescribed, respectively, and demand an informal conference to meet and confer for settlement of the issues in dispute. Upon receipt of a demand, the City shall schedule a meet and confer conference within 30 days for settlement of the dispute. (e) M
ediation . Within 10 business days following the conclusion of the meet and confer conference, if the claim or any portion of the claim remains in dispute, the City shall provide the Contractor a written statement identifying the portion of the claim that remains in dispute and the portion that is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 days after the City issues its written statement. Any disputed portion of the claim, as identified by the contractor in writing, shall be submitted to nonbinding mediation, with the City and the Contractor sharing the associated costs equally. The City and Contractor shall mutually agree to a mediator within 10 business days after the disputed portion of the claim has been identified in writing, unless the parties agree to select a mediator at a later time. (i) If the parties cannot agree upon a mediator, each party shall select a mediator and those mediators shall select a qualified neutral third party to mediate with regard to the disputed portion of the claim. Each party shall bear the fees and costs charged by its respective mediator in connection with the selection of the neutral mediator. (ii) For purposes of this section, mediation includes any nonbinding process, including, but not limited to, neutral evaluation or a dispute review board, in which an independent third party or board assists the parties in dispute resolution through negotiation or by issuance of an evaluation. Any mediation utilized shall conform to the timeframes in this section. -23-
01007.0006/1060572.1
(iii) Unless otherwise agreed to by the City and the contractor in writing, the mediation conducted pursuant to this section shall excuse any further obligation under Public Contract Code Section 20104.4 to mediate after litigation has been commenced. (iv) All unresolved claims shall be considered jointly in a single mediation, unless a new unrelated claim arises after mediation is completed. (f) City’s Responses. The City’s failure to respond to a claim from the Contractor within the time periods described in this section or to otherwise meet the time requirements of this section shall result in the claim being deemed rejected in its entirety. A claim that is denied by reason of the City’s failure to have responded to a claim, or its failure to otherwise meet the time requirements of this section, shall not constitute an adverse finding with regard to the merits of the claim or the responsibility of qualifications of the Contractor. City’s failure to respond shall not waive City’s rights to any subsequent procedures for the resolution of disputed claims.
(g) G
overnment Code Claims. If following the mediation, the claim or any portion remains in dispute, the Contractor must comply with the claim procedures set forth in Government Code Section 900 et seq. prior to filing any lawsuit against the City. Such Government Code claims and any subsequent lawsuit based upon the Government Code claims shall be limited to those matters that remain unresolved after all procedures pertaining to extra work, disputed work, construction claims, and/or changed conditions, including any required mediation, have been followed by Contractor. If no such Government Code claim is submitted, or if the prerequisite contractual requirements are not satisfied, no action against the City may be filed. A Government Code claim must be filed no earlier than the date that Contractor completes all contractual prerequisites to filing a Government Code claim, including any required mediation.

A Government Code claim shall be inclusive of all unresolved claims unless a new unrelated claim arises after the Government Code claim is submitted. For purposes of Government Code Section 900 et seq., the running of the period of time within which a claim must be filed shall be tolled from the time the Contractor submits his or her written claim to the City until the time the claim is denied, including any period of time utilized by the meet and confer conference or mediation that does not result in a complete resolutions of all claims. (h) C
ivil Actions for Claims of $375,000 or Less . The following procedures are established for all civil actions filed to resolve claims totaling $375,000 or less:
(i) Within 60 days, but no earlier than 30 days, following the filing or responsive pleadings, the court shall submit the matter to non-binding mediation unless waived by mutual stipulation of both parties or unless mediation was held prior to commencement of the action in accordance with Public Contract Code section 9204 and the procedures in this Section.

The mediation process shall provide for the selection within 15 days by both parties of a disinterested third person as mediator, shall be commenced within 30 days of the submittal, and shall be concluded within 15 days from the commencement of the mediation unless a time requirement is extended upon a good cause showing to the court or by stipulation of both parties.

If the parties fail to select a mediator within the 15-day period, either party may petition the court to appoint the mediator.
-24-
01007.0006/1060572.1
(ii) If the matter remains in dispute, the case shall be submitted to judicial arbitration pursuant to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1141.10) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, notwithstanding Section 1141.11 of that code. The Civil Discovery Act ( Title 4 (commencing with Section 2016.010) of Part 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure) shall apply to any proceeding brought under this subdivision consistent with the rules pertaining to judicial arbitration.
(iii) Upon stipulation of the parties, arbitrators appointed for these purposes shall be experienced in construction law, and, upon stipulation of the parties, mediators and arbitrators shall be paid necessary and reasonable hourly rates of pay not to exceed the ir customary rate, and such fees and expenses shall be paid equally by the parties, except in the case of arbitration where the arbitrator, for good cause, determines a different division. (iv) In addition to Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 1141.10) of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, any party who after receiving an arbitration award requests a trial de novo but does not obtain a more favorable judgment shall, in addition to payment of costs and fees under that chapter, pay the attorney's fees of the other party arising out of the trial de novo.

7.5 Waiver.

Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.

Acceptance by City of any work or services by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.

Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

7.6 Rights and Remedies Are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercis e by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party.

7.7 Unfair Business Practices Claims.

Pursuant to Public Contract Code section 7103.5, i n entering into this Agreement, Contractor offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, (comme ncing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services or materials related to this Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to the Contractor without further acknowledgment by the Parties. -25-
01007.0006/1060572.1
ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Contractor, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Contractor or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest.

Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contractor ’s performance of services under this Agreement. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Project Manager. Contractor agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.

No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Contractor warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Contractor covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religi on, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or other protected class.

8.4 Unauthorized Aliens.

Contractor hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq. , as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Contractor so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Contractor hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City. -26-
01007.0006/1060572.1
ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Provisions Required By Law.

Each and every provision of law and clause required by law to be inserted in this Agreement shall be deemed to be inserted herein, and the Agreement shall be read and enforced as though it were included herein. If through mistake or otherwise any such provision is not inserted, or is not correctly inserted, then upon application of either party, the contract shall forthwith be physically amended to make such insertion or correction.

9.2 Notices.

Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Project Manager (with her/his name and City title), City of Carson, 701 E Carson Street, Carson, California 90745 and in the case of the Contractor, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy -two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

9.3 Interpretation.

The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

9.4 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original, whether the signatures are originals, electronic, facsimiles or digital. All such counterparts shall together co nstitute but one and the same Agreement. All signatures on bonds must be originals.

9.5 Integration; Amendment.

This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Contractor and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.
-27-
01007.0006/1060572.1

9.6 Severability.

In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.7 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion.

No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial inte rest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation. The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Contractor warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or conse quence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement.

Contractor further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not l imited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Contractor is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or othe r conduct resulting in such payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect.

Contractor’s Authorized Initials _______

9.8 Corporate Authority.

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

-28-
01007.0006/1060572.1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF CARSON, a California charter
city
______________________________
Lula Davis-Holmes, Mayor

ATTEST:

Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
_____________________________
Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney
[alh; rjl]
CONTRACTOR:

SELECT ELECTRIC, INC., a California
corporation
*By: _______________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: _____________________________

*By: _______________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: _____________________________

Address: 1700 E. Via Burton Street
Anaheim, CA 92806

*Two corporate officer signatures required when Contractor is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONTRACTOR ’S

SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE

INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTOR’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

01007.0006/1060572.1

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE
On __________, 2025 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same i n his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: _____________________________________

OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT

INDIVIDUAL

CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________

TITLE(S)

PARTNER(S) LIMITED

GENERAL

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

TRUSTEE(S)

GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER_______________________________
______________________________________
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________

___________________________________

TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________

DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.

01007.0006/1060572.1

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: _____________________________________

OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT

INDIVIDUAL

CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________

TITLE(S)

PARTNER(S) LIMITED

GENERAL

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

TRUSTEE(S)

___________________________________

TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________

DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE

01007.0006/1060572.1 A-1

EXHIBIT A
CONTRACTOR’S BID

SEE ATTACHED BID SCHEDULE
PROJECT NO. 1667

GRAND TOTAL: $787,887.00

01007.0006/1060572.1

EXHIBIT B

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
(Superseding Contract Boilerplate)

If the Parties wish to revise provisions in the Agreement above (from page 1 through the signature page), then the revisions shall be presented in this Exhibit B, with deletions shown in strike through and additions shown in bold and italics.

None.

01007.0006/1060572.1

EXHIBIT C

PERFORMANCE BOND
We, Select Electric, Inc. , a California corporation , as Principal, and _____________, as Surety, jointly and severally, firmly bind ourselves, our heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, as set forth herein, to the City of Carson (“City”) for payment of the penal sum of Seven Hundred Eighty Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty Seven U.S. Dollars and Zero Cents ($787,887.00). City and Principal have entered into an agreement, or are about to enter into the agreement attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, for completion of public works for the property(ies) referenced in said agreement. Surety herein approves of the terms and conditions of said agreement and binds itself to faithfully perform the obligations of Principal therein if Principal fails to so perform. Surety acknowledges that the agreement herein referenced shall be that document as executed by City and Principal.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that if the Principal shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform all of the covenants, conditions, and provisions in said agreement, and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on Principal's part to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City, City’s engineer, and their consultants, and each of their officials, directors, officers, employees and agents, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

Surety agrees that should it fail to take over and diligently perform the agreement upon Principal's default after notice and within the time specified in the agreement, Surety will promptly on demand deposit with City such amount as City may reasonably es timate as the cost of completing all of Principal's obligations. Surety's obligation for payment herein shall exist, notwithstanding any controversy between Principal and City regarding Principal's failure under the agreement, and payment by Surety should be conclusively presumed between the parties herein to relieve, as demanded, Surety's obligations herein and shall be deemed proper payment as between Principal and Surety.

Surety agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the agreement, or the work to be performed thereunder or the plans and specifications, or any matters unknown to Surety which may affect Surety's risk shall in any wis e affect its obligation on this bond, and it does thereby waive notice thereof.

Principal and Surety agree that if the City is required to engage the services of an attorney in connection with the enforcement of this bond, each shall pay City's reasonable attorneys' fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition to the above sum.

01007.0006/1060572.1
Executed this day of _________, ____.

Seal of Corporation _____________

By:____________________________________
Authorized Representative of Principal

Title: _____________

(ATTACH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES)

Any claims under this bond may be addressed to: (check one)

Surety's agent for service
of process in California: ( ) _____________________
[name of surety company]

_________________________ ____________________________________ Name Street Number
_________________________ ____________________________________ Street Number City and State
_________________________ ____________________________________ City and State Telephone Number
_________________________
Telephone Number
By:____________________________________
Attorney in Fact or other
Representative

(ATTACH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE)

Furnish the name, address and phone number of the company agent as well as the surety company.

Sureties must be authorized to do business in and have an agent for service of process in California and be on the accredited list of the United States Treasury Department (their bonds will be limited to such amounts as would be acceptable to the Treasury Department), and otherwise meet the requirements of the agreement.

01007.0006/1060572.1

EXHIBIT D

PAYMENT BOND

We, Select Electric, Inc. , a California corporation , as Principal, and _____________, as Surety, jointly and severally, firmly bind ourselves, our heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, as set forth herein, to the City of Carson (“City”) and those for whose benefit this bond insures in the sum of Seven Hundred Eighty Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty Seven U.S. Dollars and Zero Cents ($787,887.00). City and Principal have entered into an agreement, or are about to enter into the agreement attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, for completion of public works for the property(ies) referenced in said agreement. Surety herein approves of the terms and conditions of said agreement and binds itself to faithfully perform the obligations of Principal therein if Principal fails to so perform. Surety acknowledges that the agreement herein referenced shall be that document as executed by City and Principal. If Principal or any of Principal's contractors or subcontractors, fails to pay any of the persons named in Section 9000 et seq. of the California Civil Code employed in the performance of the agreement for materials furnished or for labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work or labor, then Surety shall pay the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified above, and also shall pay, in case suit is brought upon this bond, such reasonable attorneys' fees as shall be fixed by the court.

Surety agrees that it shall pay the amounts due the persons above named and diligently perform the agreement upon Principal's default after notice and within the time specified in the agreement.

If Surety fails to perform within the times specified in the agreement, Surety shall promptly on demand deposit with City such amount as City may reasonably estimate as the cost of completing all of Principal's obligations. Surety's obligation for payment herein shall extend, notwithstanding any controversy between Principal and City regarding Principal's failure under the agreement.

Principal and Surety agree that any payment by Surety pursuant to this paragraph should be conclusively presumed between the parties herein to relieve, as demanded, Surety's obligation herein and shall be deemed proper payment as between Principal and Surety.

This bond shall insure to the benefit of any and all of the persons named in Section 9000 et seq. of the California Civil Code so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.

Surety agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the agreement, or the work to be performed thereunder, or the plans and specifications, or any matters unknown to Surety which might affect Surety's risk, shall in any way affect its obligation on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice thereof.

Principal and Surety agree that should City become a party to any action on this bond, that each will also pay City's reasonable attorneys' fees incurred therein in addition to the above sums.

01007.0006/1060572.1

Executed this _____________ day of ___________, ______.

Seal of Corporation ______________

By:______________________________
Authorized Representative of Principal

Title: __________

(ATTACH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES)

Any claims under this bond may be addressed to: (check one)

Surety's agent for service
of process in California: ( ) ________________
[name of surety]

_________________________ _____________________________ Name Street Number

_________________________ _____________________________ Street Number City and State

_________________________ _____________________________ City and State Telephone Number
_________________________
Telephone Number
By:_____________________________
Attorney in Fact or other
Representative

(ATTACH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE)

Furnish the name, address and phone number of the company agent as well as the surety company.

01007.0006/1060572.1

EXHIBIT E

INVOICE FORM

FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 1 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

MEASURE M FUNDING AGREEMENT

MULTI-YEAR SUBREGIONAL PROGRAMS

This Funding Agreement (“FA”) is made and entered into effective as of November 30, 2023 (“Effective Date”), and is by and between the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA") and City of Carson ("GRANTEE") for Traffic Signal Upgrade - Avalon Blvd. and Gardena Blvd., LACMTA Project ID# MM5507.10 and FTIP# LA9919284, (the "Project"). This Project is eligible for funding under Line 63 of the Measure M Expenditure Plan.

WHEREAS, LACMTA adopted Ordinance #16-01, the Los Angeles County Traffic Improvement Plan, on June 23, 2016 (the “Ordinance”), which Ordinance was approved by the voters of Los Angeles County on November 8, 2016 as “Measure M” and became effective on July 1, 2017.

WHEREAS, the funding set forth herein is intended to fund Construction of the Project.

WHEREAS, the LACMTA Board, at its September 22, 2022 meeting, programmed $350,000, in Measure M Funds to GRANTEE for Construction of the Project, subject to the terms and conditions contained in this FA; and

WHEREAS, the Funds are currently programmed as follows: $350,000 in Measure M Funds in Fiscal Years (FY) 2022-23; FY 2023-24; and FY 2024-25. The total designated for the Construction of the Traffic Signal Upgrade - Avalon Blvd. and Gardena Blvd. is $350,000.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

The terms and conditions of this FA consist of the following and each is incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein:

1. Part I – Specific Terms of the FA

2. Part II – General Terms of the FA

3. Attachment A – Project Funding

4. Attachment B – Expenditure Plan- Cost & Cash Flow Budget

5. Attachment C – Scope of Work

6. Attachment D – Project Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines

7. Attachment D-1 – Intentionally omitted

8. Attachment D-2 – Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report

9. Attachment E – Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Sheet

10. Attachment F – Bond Requirements

11. Attachment G – Los Angeles County Regional ITS Architecture (CONNECT-IT) Consistency Self-Certification Policy Form

12. Attachment G-1 – Signal Synchronization, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and Transportation Technology Improvements

13. Any other attachments or documents referenced in the above documents

FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 2 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

In the event of a conflict, the Special Grant Conditions, if any, shall prevail over the Specific Terms of the FA and any attachments and the Specific Terms of the FA shall prevail over the General Terms of the FA.

Ü·¹·¬¿´´§ ·¹²»¼ ¾§ Ú¿²²§ Ð¿²
Ü¿¬»æ îðîìòðçòðç ïîæîðæíï óðéùððù
FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 4 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

PART I

SPECIFIC TERMS OF THE FA

1. Title of the Project (the "Project"): Traffic Signal Upgrade - Avalon Blvd. and Gardena Blvd. – Construction of the Project. LACMTA Project ID# MM5507.10, FTIP# LA9919284.

2. Grant Funds:

2.1 Programmed Funds for this Project consist of Measure M Funds.

2.2 To the extent the Measure M Funds are available; LACMTA shall make to GRANTEE a grant of the Measure M funds in the amount of $350,000 (the “Funds”) for the Project. LACMTA Board of Directors’ action of September 22, 2022 granted the Measure M Funds for the Project. The Funds are programmed over three (3) years for Fiscal Years (FY) 2022-23, FY 2023-24, and FY 2024-25.

3. This grant shall be paid on a reimbursement basis. GRANTEE must provide the appropriate supporting documentation with the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report.

GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if applicable, must be spent in the appropriate proportion to the Funds with each quarter’s expenditures. LACMTA will withhold 10% of eligible expenditures per invoice as retention pending an audit of expenditures and completion of scope of work.

4. Attachment A the “Project Funding” documents all sources of funds programmed for the Project as approved by LACMTA. The Project Funding includes the total programmed funds for the Project, including the Funds programmed by LACMTA and, if any, the GRANTEE Funding Commitment of other sources of funding. The Project Funding also includes the fiscal years in which all the funds for the Project are programmed. The Funds are subject to adjustment by subsequent LACMTA Board Action.

5. Attachment B is the Expenditure Plan- Cost & Cash Flow Budget (the "Expenditure Plan"). It is the entire proposed cash flow, the Budget and financial plan for the Project, which includes the total sources of all funds programmed to the Project, including GRANTEE and other entity funding commitments, if any, for this Project as well as the fiscal year and quarters the Project funds are anticipated to be expended. GRANTEE shall update the Expenditure Plan annually, no later than December 31, and such update shall be submitted to LACMTA’s Senior Executive Officer managing the Measure M Multi-Year Subregional Program in writing. If the LACMTA’s Senior Executive Officer managing the Measure M Multi-Year Subregional Program concurs with such updated Expenditure Plan in writing, Attachment B shall be replaced with the new Attachment B setting forth the latest approved Expenditure Plan. Payments under this FA shall be consistent with Attachment B as revised from time to time. Any change to the final milestone date must be made by a fully executed amendment to this FA.

6. Attachment C is the “Scope of Work”. The GRANTEE shall complete the Project as described in the Scope of Work. This Scope of Work shall include a detailed description of the Project and the work to be completed, including anticipated Project milestones and a schedule FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 5 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

consistent with the lapsing policy in Part II, Section 9, and a description of the Project limits, if the Project is a capital project. No later than December 31 of each year, GRANTEE shall notify LACMTA if there are any changes to the final milestone date set forth in the schedule or any changes to the Scope of Work. If LACMTA agrees to such changes, the parties shall memorialize such changes in an amendment to this FA. Work shall be delivered in accordance with the schedule and scope identified in this FA unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing in an amendment to this FA. If GRANTEE fails to meet milestones or fails to deliver the Project, LACMTA will have the option to suspend or terminate the FA for default as described in Part II, Sections 2, 9, 10 and 11 herein below. To the extent interim milestone dates are not met but GRANTEE believes and can show documentation acceptable to LACMTA supporting GRANTEE’s ability to make up the time so as to not impact the final milestone date, GRANTEE shall notify LACMTA of such changes in its Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports and such interim milestone dates will automatically be amended to the latest interim milestone dates provided in the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports Attachment D-2. In no event can the final milestone date be amended by a Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report.

7. No changes to this FA, including but not limited to the Funds, and any other source of funds from LACMTA in the Project Funding, Expenditure Plan or the Scope of Work shall be allowed without an amendment to the original FA, approved and signed by both parties.

8. Attachment D is the “Project Reporting & Expenditure Guidelines”. GRANTEE shall complete the “Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report”. The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report is attached to this FA as Attachment D-2 in accordance with Attachment D – Project Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines.

9. Attachment E, the "FTIP PROJECT SHEET (PDF)", is required to ensure that the Project is programmed correctly in the most up-to-date FTIP document. The FTIP PROJECT SHEET (PDF) can be found in ProgramMetro FTIP database under the reports section at https://programmetro.ecointeractive.com/secure2/login.asp. All projects that receive funding through Measure M must be programmed into the FTIP, which includes locally funded regionally significant projects for information and air quality modeling purposes. GRANTEE shall review the Project in ProgramMetro each year and update or correct the Project information as necessary during a scheduled FTIP amendment or adoption. GRANTEE will be notified of amendments and adoptions to the FTIP via e-mail. Changes to the FTIP through ProgramMetro should be made as soon as possible after GRANTEE is aware of any changes to the Project, but no later than October 1 of the year the change or update is effective. Should GRANTEE fail to meet this date, it may affect GRANTEE's ability to access funding, delay the Project and may ultimately result in the Funds being lapsed.

10. LACMTA anticipates it may need to avail itself of lower cost bonds or other debt, the interest on which is tax exempt for federal tax purposes (collectively, the “Bonds") to provide at least a portion of its funding commitments under this Agreement to GRANTEE.

GRANTEE shall ensure that the expenditure of the Funds disbursed to GRANTEE does not jeopardize the tax-exemption of the interest, as specified in the Bond Requirements attached as Attachment F to this Agreement. GRANTEE agrees to provide LACMTA with progress reports, expenditure documentation, and any other documentation as reasonably requested by LACMTA and necessary for LACMTA to fulfill its responsibilities as the grantee or FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 6 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

administrator or bond issuer of the Funds. With regard to LACMTA debt financing to provide any portion of the Funds, GRANTEE shall take all reasonable actions as may be requested of it by LACMTA's Project Manager for the Project, to assist LACMTA in demonstrating and maintaining over time, compliance with the relevant sections of the Federal Tax Code to maintain such Bonds’ tax status.

11. GRANTEE shall comply with the “Special Grant Conditions” attached as Attachment G, if any.

12. No changes to the (i) Grant amount, (ii) Project Funding, (iii) the Scope of Work (except as provided herein), (iv) Final milestone date or (v) Special Grant Conditions, shall be allowed without a written amendment to this FA, approved and signed by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his/her designee and GRANTEE. Modifications that do not materially affect the terms of this FA, such as redistributing Funds among existing budget line items or non- material schedule changes must be formally requested by GRANTEE and approved by LACMTA in writing. Non-material changes are those changes which do not affect the grant amount or its schedule, Project Funding, or the Scope of Work, including the Work schedule.

13. LACMTA's Address:

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Attention: Shrota Sharma
LACMTA Project Manager
Mail Stop: 99-18-02
Phone: (213) 418-3058
Email: [email protected]

14. GRANTEE's Address:

City of Carson
701 E Carson Street
Carson, CA 90745
Ian Holst
Phone: (310) 952-1700 x1822
Email: [email protected]

FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 7 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

PART II

GENERAL TERMS OF THE FA

1. TERM

The term of this FA shall commence on the Effective Date of this FA, and shall terminate upon the occurrence of all of the following, unless terminated earlier as provided herein: (i) the agreed upon Scope of Work has been completed; (ii) all LACMTA audit and reporting requirements have been satisfied; and (iii) the final disbursement of the Funds has been made to GRANTEE. All eligible Project expenses as defined in the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines (Attachment D), incurred after the FA Effective Date shall be reimbursed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this FA unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing.

2. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION

Should LACMTA determine there are insufficient Measure M Funds available for the Project, LACMTA may suspend or terminate this FA by giving written notice to GRANTEE at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of such suspension or termination. If a Project is suspended or terminated pursuant to this section, LACMTA will not reimburse GRANTEE any costs incurred after that suspension or termination date, except those costs necessary to: (i) return any facilities modified by the Project construction to a safe and operable state; and (ii) suspend or terminate the construction contractor’s control over the Project. LACMTA’s share of these costs will be consistent with the established funding percentages outlined in this FA.

3. INVOICE BY GRANTEE

Unless otherwise stated in this FA, the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report, with supporting documentation of expenses, Project progress and other documents as required, which has been pre-approved by LACMTA, all as described in Part II, Section 6.1 of this FA, shall satisfy LACMTA invoicing requirements. Grantee shall only submit for payment the LACMTA pre-approved Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report Packets to the LACMTA Project Manager at the email address shown in Part I and to LACMTA Accounts Payable Department as shown below.

Submit invoice with supporting documentation to:

[email protected] (preferable)
or
mail to:

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Accounts Payable
P. O. Box 512296
Los Angeles, CA 90051-0296
All invoice material must contain the following information:

Re: LACMTA Project ID# MM5507.10 and FA# 9200000000M550710 LACMTA Shrota Sharma; Mail Stop 99-18-2

FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 8 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

4. USE OF FUNDS

4.1 GRANTEE shall utilize the Funds to complete the Project as described in the Scope of Work and in accordance with the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines, the specifications for use for the transportation purposes described in the Ordinance, the Guidelines and the Multi-Year Subregional Programs Administrative Procedures.

4.2 Attachment C shall constitute the agreed upon Scope of Work between LACMTA and GRANTEE for the Project. The Funds, as granted under this FA, can only be used towards the completion of the Scope of Work detailed in Attachment C.

4.3 GRANTEE shall not use the Funds to substitute for any other funds or projects not specified in this FA. Further, GRANTEE shall not use the Funds for any expenses or activities above and beyond the approved Scope of Work (Attachment C) without an amendment to the FA approved and signed by the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his Designee. To the extent LACMTA provides GRANTEE with bond or commercial paper proceeds, such Funds may not be used to reimburse for any costs that jeopardize the tax exempt nature of such financings as reasonably determined by LACMTA and its bond counsel.

4.4 GRANTEE must use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner. If GRANTEE intends to use a consultant or contractor to implement all or part of the Project, LACMTA requires that such activities be procured in accordance with GRANTEE’s contracting procedures and consistent with State law as appropriate. GRANTEE will also use the Funds in the most cost-effective manner when the Funds are used to pay “in-house” staff time. This effective use of funds provision will be verified by LACMTA through on- going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits.

4.5 GRANTEE’S employee, officers, councilmembers, board member, agents, or consultants (a “GRANTEE Party”) are prohibited from participating in the selection, award, or administration of a third-party contract or sub-agreement supported by the Funds if a real or apparent conflict of interest would be involved. A conflict of interest would include, without limitation, an organizational conflict of interest or when any of the following parties has a financial or other interest in any entity selected for award: (a) a GRANTEE Party (b) any member of a GRANTEE Party’s immediate family, (c) a partner of a GRANTEE Party; (d) any organization that employs or intends to employ any of the above. This conflict of interest provision will be verified by LACMTA through on-going Project monitoring and through any LACMTA interim and final audits.

4.6 If a facility, equipment (such as computer hardware or software), vehicle or property, purchased or leased using the Funds, ceases to be used for the proper use as originally stated in the Scope of Work, or the Project is discontinued, any Funds expended for that purpose must be returned to LACMTA as follows: GRANTEE shall be required to repay the Funds in proportion to the useful life remaining and in an equal proportion of the grant to GRANTEE Funding Commitment ratio.

4.7 If the Project requires the implementation of an Intelligent Transportation Systems (“ITS”) project, GRANTEE shall ensure the Project is consistent with FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 9 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

the Regional ITS Architecture. Attachment G, the Los Angeles County Regional ITS Architecture (CONNECT-IT) Consistency Self-Certification Form, must be completed and signed for planned ITS projects and/or ITS projects that use local, state, or federal funds programmed or administered through LACMTA. Refer to www.laconnect-it.com to find information about the CONNECT-IT Service Packages.

4.8 If any parking facilities are designed and/or constructed using the Funds, GRANTEE shall coordinate with LACMTA parking program staff (see www.metro.net for staff listing) in the planning, design and management of the facility and shall ensure that its implementation is consistent with the LACMTA adopted parking policy.

For the parking policy, see
http://media.metro.net/projects_studies/call_projects/images/09%20Appendix%20D%20Pa rking%20Policy.pdf

5. REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS

Funds will be released on a reimbursement basis in accordance with invoices submitted in support of the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports. LACMTA will make all disbursements electronically unless an exception is requested in writing. Reimbursements via Automated Clearing House (ACH) will be made at no cost to GRANTEE. GRANTEE must register in LACMTA’s iSupplier portal and submit an application before grant payments can be made.

The link to the portal can be found at http://media.metro.net/uploads/EBB/Vendor Portal Registration.pdf. GRANTEE must provide detailed supporting documentation with its Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports. GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if any, must be spent in direct proportion to the Funds with each quarter’s payment.

6. REPORTING AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS/PAYMENT ADJUSTMENTS

6.1 GRANTEE shall submit the draft of Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report (Attachment D-2) within sixty (60) days after the close of each quarter on the last day of the months November, February, May and August to the LACMTA Project Manager for review and pre-approval of the applicable report. LACMTA Project Manager shall review and respond in writing to the draft Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report within thirty (30) calendar days from receipt. Grantee shall submit the LACMTA pre-approved Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report no later than five (5) days after receipt of LACMTA’s written approval. Should GRANTEE fail to submit either the draft or pre-approved reports within five (5) days of the due date and/or submit incomplete reports, LACMTA will not reimburse GRANTEE until the completed required reports are received, reviewed, and approved. The Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports shall include all appropriate documentation (such as contractor invoices, timesheets, receipts, etc.), and any changes to interim milestone dates that do not impact the final milestone date. All supporting documents must include a clear justification and explanation of their relevance to the Project. If no activity has occurred during a particular quarter, GRANTEE will still be required to submit the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports indicating no dollars were expended that quarter. If a request for reimbursement exceeds $500,000 in a single month, then GRANTEE can submit such an invoice once per month with supporting documentation. Expenses that are not invoiced to LACMTA Accounts Payable FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 10 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

within ninety (90) days after the lapsing date specified in Part II, Section 9.1 below are not eligible for reimbursement.

6.2 GRANTEE shall submit the Project expenditure estimates for the subsequent fiscal year by February of each year. LACMTA will use the estimates to determine the Project budget for the upcoming fiscal year.

6.3 LACMTA, and/or its designee, shall have the right to conduct audits of the Project as deemed appropriate, such as financial and compliance audits, interim audits, pre- award audits, performance audits and final audits. LACMTA will commence a final audit within six (6) months of receipt of acceptable final invoice, provided the Project is ready for final audit (meaning all costs and charges have been paid by GRANTEE and invoiced to LACMTA, and such costs, charges and invoices are properly documented and summarized in the accounting records to enable an audit without further explanation or summarization including actual indirect rates for the period covered by the FA period under review).

GRANTEE agrees to establish and maintain proper accounting procedures and cash management records and documents in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). GRANTEE shall reimburse LACMTA for any expenditure not in compliance with the Scope of Work and/or not in compliance with other terms and conditions of this FA. The allowability of costs for GRANTEE’s own expenditures submitted to LACMTA for this Project shall be in compliance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87. The allowability of costs for GRANTEE’s contractors, consultants and suppliers expenditures submitted to LACMTA through GRANTEE’s Quarterly Progress/Expenditures shall be in compliance with OMB Circular A-87 or Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 225 (whichever is applicable). Findings of the LACMTA audit are final. When LACMTA audit findings require GRANTEE to return monies to LACMTA, GRANTEE agrees to return the monies within thirty (30) days after the final audit is sent to GRANTEE.

6.4 GRANTEE’s records shall include, without limitation, accounting records, written policies and procedures, contract files, original estimates, correspondence, change order files (including documentation covering negotiated settlements), invoices, and any other supporting evidence deemed necessary by LACMTA to substantiate charges related to the Project (all collectively referred to as “records”). Such records shall be open to inspection and subject to audit and reproduction by LACMTA auditors or authorized representatives to the extent deemed necessary by LACMTA to adequately permit evaluation of expended costs. Such records subject to audit shall also include, without limitation, those records deemed necessary by LACMTA to evaluate and verify, direct and indirect costs, (including overhead allocations) as they may apply to costs associated with the Project.

These records must be retained by GRANTEE for three years following final payment under this Agreement. Payment of retention amounts shall not occur until after the LACMTA’s final audit is completed.

6.5 GRANTEE shall cause all contractors to comply with the requirements of Part II, Section 6, paragraphs 6.3 and 6.4 above. GRANTEE shall cause all contractors to cooperate fully in furnishing or in making available to LACMTA all records deemed necessary by LACMTA auditors or authorized representatives related to the Project.

FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 11 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

6.6 LACMTA or any of its duly authorized representatives, upon reasonable written notice, shall be afforded access to all GRANTEE’s records and its contractors related to the Project, and shall be allowed to interview any employee of GRANTEE and its contractors through final payment to the extent reasonably practicable.

6.7 LACMTA or any of its duly authorized representatives, upon reasonable written notice, shall have access to the offices of GRANTEE and its contractors, shall have access to all necessary records, including reproduction, at no charge to LACMTA, and shall be provided adequate and appropriate work space in order to conduct audits in compliance with the terms and conditions of this FA.

6.8 When business travel associated with the Project requires use of a vehicle, the mileage incurred shall be reimbursed at the mileage rates set by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), as indicated in the United States General Services Administration Federal Travel Regulation, Privately Owned Vehicle Reimbursement Rates.

6.9 GRANTEE shall be responsible for ensuring all contractors/ subcontractors for the Project comply with the terms of the Ordinance, the Guidelines and the Multi-Year Subregional Programs Administrative Procedures. GRANTEE shall cooperate with LACMTA Management Audit Services Department such that LACMTA can meet its obligations under the Ordinance, the Guidelines and the Multi-Year Subregional Programs Administrative Procedures.

6.10 GRANTEE shall certify each invoice by reviewing all subcontractor costs and maintaining internal control to ensure that all expenditures are allocable, allowable and reasonable and in accordance with OMB A-87 or FAR subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, part 225, (whichever is applicable) and the terms and conditions of this FA.

6.11 GRANTEE shall also certify final costs of the Project to ensure all costs are in compliance with OMB A-87 or FAR subpart 31 and 2 CFR Subtitle A, Chapter II, part 225, (whichever is applicable) and the terms and conditions of this FA.

6.12 In addition to LACMTA’s other remedies as provided in this FA, LACMTA may withhold the Funds if the LACMTA audit has determined that GRANTEE failed to comply with the Scope of Work (such as misusing Funds or failure to return Funds owed to LACMTA in accordance with LACMTA audit findings) and /or is severely out of compliance with other terms and conditions as defined by this FA, including the access to records provisions of Part II, Section 6.

7. GRANT

This is a one-time only grant of the Measure M Funds subject to the terms and conditions agreed to herein. This grant does not imply nor obligate any future funding commitment on the part of LACMTA.

8. SOURCES AND DISPOSITION OF FUNDS
FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 12 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

8.1 The obligation for LACMTA to grant the Funds for the Project is subject to sufficient Funds being made available for the Project by the LACMTA Board of Directors. If such Funds are not made available as anticipated from Measure M Program revenues, LACMTA will have the right to adjust the cash flow accordingly until such funds become available. LACMTA shall have no obligation to provide any other funds for the Project, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by LACMTA.

8.2 GRANTEE shall fully fund and contribute the GRANTEE Funding Commitment, if any is identified in the Project Funding (Attachment A), towards the cost of the Project. If the Funds identified in Attachment A are insufficient to complete the Project, GRANTEE agrees to secure and provide such additional non-LACMTA programmed funds necessary to complete the Project.

8.3 GRANTEE shall be responsible for any and all cost overruns for the Project pursuant to Section 8.2.

8.4 GRANTEE shall be eligible for the Funds up to the grant amount specified in Part I, Section 2 of this FA subject to the terms and conditions contained herein.

Any Funds expended by GRANTEE prior to the Effective Date of this FA shall not be reimbursed nor shall they be credited toward the GRANTEE Funding Commitment requirement, without the prior written consent of LACMTA. GRANTEE Funding Commitment dollars expended prior to the year the Funds are awarded shall be spent at GRANTEE’s own risk, or as delineated in a Letter of No Prejudice executed by the prospective GRANTEE and LACMTA.

8.5 If GRANTEE receives outside funding for the Project in addition to the Funds identified in the Project Funding and the Expenditure Plan at the time this grant was awarded, this FA shall be amended to reflect such additional funding. If, at the time of final invoice or voucher, funding for the Project (including the Funds, GRANTEE Funding Commitment, and any additional funding) exceeds the actual Project costs, then the cost savings shall be applied in the same proportion as the sources of funds from each party to this FA as specified in the Project Funding and both the Funds and GRANTEE Funding Commitment required for the Project shall be reduced accordingly. LACMTA shall have the right to use any cost savings associated with the Funds at its sole discretion, including, without limitation, programming the unused Funds to another project or to another grantee within the subregion in accordance with the Ordinance, the Guidelines and the Multi-Year Subregional Programs Administrative Procedures. If, at the time of final voucher, it is determined that GRANTEE has received Funds in excess of what GRANTEE should have received for the Project, GRANTEE shall return such overage to LACMTA within 30 days from final voucher.

9. TIMELY USE OF FUNDS / REPROGRAMMING OF FUNDS

9.1 GRANTEE must demonstrate timely use of the Funds by:

(i) Executing this FA within ninety (90) days of receiving formal transmittal of the FA from LACMTA, or by December 31 of the FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 13 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

first Fiscal Year in which the Funds are programmed, whichever date is later; and
(ii) Executing Contracts for Construction or Capital purchase within twelve (12) months from the date of completion of design; and (iii) Delivering Work in accordance with schedule; changes to the schedule will require an Amendment to Attachment C to reflect updated milestone dates. Meeting the Project milestone due dates as agreed upon by the LACMTA and GRANTEE in
Attachment C of this FA; and
(iv) Submitting the Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Reports as described in Part II, Section 6.1 of this FA; and
(v) Expending the Funds granted under this FA for allowable costs within three years or 36 months from July 1 of the Fiscal Year in which the Funds are programmed, unless otherwise stated in this FA. All Funds programmed for FY 2022-23 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2025. All Funds programmed for FY 2023-24 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2026. All Funds programmed for FY 2024-25 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2027.

9.2 In the event that the timely use of the Funds is not demonstrated as described in Part II, Section 9.1 of this FA, the Project will be reevaluated by LACMTA as part of its Annual Update process and the Funds may be reprogrammed to another project by the LACMTA Board of Directors in accordance with the Ordinance, the Guidelines and the Multi- Year Subregional Programs Administrative Procedures. In the event that all the Funds are reprogrammed, this FA shall automatically terminate.

10. DEFAULT

A Default under this FA is defined as any one or more of the following: (i) GRANTEE fails to comply with the terms and conditions contained herein; and/or (ii) GRANTEE fails to perform satisfactorily or make material changes, as determined by LACMTA at its sole discretion, to the Expenditure Plan, the Scope of Work, or the Project Funding without LACMTA’s prior written consent or approval as provided herein.

11. REMEDIES

11.1 In the event of a Default by GRANTEE, LACMTA shall provide written notice of such Default to GRANTEE with a 30-day period to cure the Default. In the event GRANTEE fails to cure the Default, or commit to cure the Default and commence the same within such 30-day period to the satisfaction of LACMTA, LACMTA shall have the following remedies: (i) LACMTA may terminate this FA; (ii) LACMTA may make no further disbursements of Funds to GRANTEE; and/or (iii) LACMTA may recover from GRANTEE any Funds disbursed to GRANTEE as allowed by law or in equity.

11.2 Effective upon receipt of written notice of termination from LACMTA, GRANTEE shall not undertake any new work or obligation with respect to this FA unless so FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 14 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

directed by LACMTA in writing. Any Funds expended after termination shall be the sole responsibility of GRANTEE.

11.3 The remedies described herein are non-exclusive. LACMTA shall have the right to enforce any and all rights and remedies herein or which may be now or hereafter available at law or in equity.

12. COMMUNICATIONS

12.1 GRANTEE shall ensure that all Communication Materials contain recognition of LACMTA’s contribution to the Project as more particularly set forth in “Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines” available online at http://metro.net/partners-civic. The Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines may be changed from time to time during the course of this Agreement. GRANTEE shall be responsible for complying with the latest Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines during the term of this Agreement, unless otherwise specifically authorized in writing by the LACMTA Chief Communications Officer.

12.2 For purposes of this Agreement, “Communications Materials” include, but are not limited to, press events, public and external newsletters, printed materials, advertising, websites radio and public service announcements, electronic media, and construction site signage. A more detailed definition of “Communications Materials” is found in the Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines.

12.3 The Metro logo is a trademarked item that shall be reproduced and displayed in accordance with specific graphic guidelines. The preferred logo lock-up for Funding Recipients to use is included in the Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines.

12.4 GRANTEE shall ensure that any subcontractor, including, but not limited to, public relations, public affairs, and/or marketing firms hired to produce Project Communications Materials for public and external purposes will comply with the requirements contained in this Section.

12.5 The LACMTA Project Manager shall be responsible for monitoring GRANTEE’s compliance with the terms and conditions of this Section. GRANTEE’s failure to comply with the terms of this Section shall be deemed a default hereunder and LACMTA shall have all rights and remedies set forth herein.

FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 15 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

13. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS

13.1 This FA, along with its Attachments, constitutes the entire understanding between the parties, with respect to the subject matter herein. The FA shall not be amended, nor any provisions or breach hereof waived, except in writing signed by the parties who agreed to the original FA or the same level of authority. Adoption of revisions or supplements to the Guidelines shall cause such revisions or supplements to become incorporated automatically into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.

13.2 GRANTEE is obligated to continue using the Project dedicated to the public transportation purposes for which the Project was initially approved. The Project right- of-way, the Project facilities constructed or reconstructed on the Project site, and/or Project property purchased, excluding construction easements and excess property (whose proportionate proceeds shall be distributed in an equal proportion of the grant to GRANTEE Funding Commitment ratio), shall remain dedicated to public transportation use in the same proportion and scope and to the same extent as described in this FA. Equipment acquired as part of the Project, including office equipment, vehicles, shall be dedicated to that use for their full economic life cycle, including any extensions of that life cycle achieved by reconstruction, rehabilitation, or enhancements.

13.3 In the event that there is any legal court (e.g., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, or the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California) proceeding between the parties to enforce or interpret this FA, to protect or establish any rights or remedies hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees.

13.4 Neither LACMTA nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or committed to be done by GRANTEE under or in connection with any work performed by and or service provided by GRANTEE, its officers, agents, employees, contractors and subcontractors under this FA. GRANTEE shall fully indemnify, defend and hold LACMTA and its subsidiaries, and its officers, agents and employees harmless from and against any liability and expenses, including without limitation, defense costs, any costs or liability on account of bodily injury, death or personal injury of any person or for damage to or loss of risk of property, any environmental obligation, any legal fees and any claims for damages of any nature whatsoever arising out of the Project, including without limitation: (i) use of the Funds by GRANTEE, or its officers, agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors; (ii) breach of GRANTEE’s obligations under this FA; or (iii) any act or omission of GRANTEE, or its officers, agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors in the performance of the work or the provision of the services, in connection with the Project including, without limitation, the Scope of Work, described in this FA.

13.5 Neither party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligation hereunder to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by unforeseen causes including acts of God, acts of a public enemy, and government acts beyond the control and without fault or negligence of the affected party. Each party hereto FTIP #: LA9919284
Subregion ID: South Bay

Project ID#: MM5507.10
FA# 9200000000M550710

Rev: 05.16.2023 16 Measure M Funding Agreement – MSP

shall give notice promptly to the other of the nature and extent of any such circumstances claimed to delay, hinder, or prevent performance of any obligations under this FA.

13.6 GRANTEE shall comply with and ensure that work performed under this FA is done in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, and procedural requirements including Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), and the applicable requirements and regulations of LACMTA. GRANTEE acknowledges responsibility for obtaining copies of and complying with the terms of the most recent federal, state, or local laws and regulations, and LACMTA requirements including any amendments thereto.

13.7 GRANTEE agrees that the applicable requirements of this FA shall be included in every contract entered into by GRANTEE or its contractors relating to work performed under this FA and LACMTA shall have the right to review and audit such contracts.

13.8 GRANTEE shall not assign this FA, or any part thereof, without prior approval of the LACMTA Chief Executive Officer or his designee. Any assignment by GRANTEE without said prior consent by LACMTA shall be void and unenforceable.

13.9 This FA shall be governed by California law. If any provision of this FA is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

13.10 The covenants and agreements of this FA shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, each of the parties and their respective successors and assigns.

13.11 GRANTEE will advise LACMTA prior to any key Project staffing changes. Notice will be given to the parties at the address specified in Part I, unless otherwise notified in writing of change of address or contact person.

13.12 GRANTEE, in the performance of the work described in this FA, is not a contractor nor an agent or employee of LACMTA. GRANTEE attests to no organizational or personal conflicts of interest and agrees to notify LACMTA immediately in the event that a conflict, or the appearance thereof, arises. GRANTEE shall not represent itself as an agent or employee of LACMTA and shall have no powers to bind LACMTA in contract or otherwise.

SOURCES OF FUNDS Prior Years FY2021-22 FY2022-23 FY2023-24 FY2024-25 FY2025-26 Total Budget
% of Budget

LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDING
MEASURE M MSP FUNDS 2,000$ 130,000$ 218,000$ 350,000$ SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS -$ -$ 2,000$ 130,000$ 218,000$ -$ 350,000$ 100% OTHER NON LACMTA FUNDING:

LOCAL: -$ 0%
STATE: -$ 0%
FEDERAL: -$ 0%
PRIVATE OR OTHER: -$ 0% SUM NON-LACMTA FUNDS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDS -$ -$ 2,000$ 130,000$ 218,000$ -$ 350,000$ 100%

ATTACHMENT A -PROJECT FUNDING
Measure M MSP - South Bay Highway Operational Improvements Program - Funding Agreement Projects - FA#: 9200000000M550710 Project Title: Traffic Signal Upgrade - Avalon Blvd. and Gardena Blvd. Project ID#: MM5507.10

PROGRAMMED BUDGET - SOURCES OF FUNDS

03.01.19 Measure M Funding Agreement - MSP
Attachment A - Project Funding
SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2023-24
Qtr 1
FY 2023-24
Qtr 2
FY 2023-24
Qtr 3
FY 2023-24
Qtr 4
FY 2024-25
Qtr 1
FY 2024-25
Qtr 2
FY 2024-25
Qtr 3
FY 2024-25
Qtr 4
TOTAL
BUDGET
LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS:

MEASURE M MSP FUNDS:

Planning Activities/Prog Dev $0
Environmental $0
Design and PS&E $0
Right-of-Way Acquisition $0
Construction $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 $350,000 Vehicle Purchase $0
Others $0
Total Measure M $0 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $350,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $0 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $350,000

PROJECT FUNDINGPROJECT FUNDING
FY2023-24 and FY2024-25 $0 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $350,000 TOTAL LACMTA FUNDS $0 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $350,000 TOTAL NON-LACMTA FUNDS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $350,000

ATTACHMENT B - EXPENDITURE PLAN COST & CASH FLOW BUDGET Measure M MSP - South Bay Highway Operational Improvements Program - Funding Agreement Projects - FA#: 9200000000M550710 Project Title: Traffic Signal Upgrade - Avalon Blvd. and Gardena Blvd. Project ID#: MM5507.10

PROGRAMMED SOURCES OF FUNDS

09.10.19 1 of 1
Measure M Funding Agreement - MSP
Attachment B - Expenditure Plan

Invoice #
QUARTERLY PROGRESS/EXPENDITURE REPORT Invoice Date
FA#
Quarterly Report #

GRANTEES ARE REQUESTED TO EMAIL THIS REPORT TO
[email protected]
or submit by mail to:

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Accounts Payable
P. O. Box 512296
Los Angeles, California 90051-0296
Please note that letters or other forms
of documentation may not be substituted for this form. Refer to the Reporting and Expenditure Guidelines (Attachment D) for further information.

Balance Remaining
% of Project Budget Expended to
Date
Grantee To Complete
LACMTA FA MEASURE M ATTACHMENT D-2
SECTION 1: QUARTERLY EXPENSE REPORT
Total Project Budget
Project-to-Date Expenditure
Funds Expended to Date (Include
this Quarter)
Please itemize grant-related charges for this Quarter on Page 5 of this report and include totals in this Section.

Retention Amount
This Quarter Expenditure
Project Quarter Expenditure
Net Invoice Amount (Less
Retention)
LACMTA Measure M MSP Grant $
9200000000M

12.06.19 1
Measure M Funding Agreement - MSP
Attachment D-2 Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report
PROJECT TITLE:

QUARTERLY REPORT SUBMITTED FOR:

Fiscal Year : 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
2021-22 2022-23 2023-24
Quarter : Q1: Jul - Sep Q2: Oct - Dec
Q3: Jan - Mar Q4: Apr - Jun
DATE SUBMITTED:

Measure M Multi-Year Subregional Program Type:

Phone Number:

E-mail:

SECTION 2: GENERAL INFORMATION
Contact Name:

Job Title:

Name:

FA #:

LACMTA Project Manager
E-mail:

Grantee Contact / Project
Manager
Phone Number:

Mailing Address:

City / Agency:

Department:

12.06.19 2
Measure M Funding Agreement - MSP
Attachment D-2 Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report
Start Date End Date
Ground Breaking Event
On schedule per original FA schedule Less than 12 months behind original schedule Between 12-24 months behind original schedule More than 24 months behind original schedule Yes No Not Applicable
Yes No Not Applicable
B. Was the project design started within 6 months of the date originally stated in the FA? C. Was a construction contract or capital purchase executed within 9 months after completion of design / specifications?

2. PROJECT COMPLETION
Total Project Duration (Months)
Ribbon Cutting Event
A. Based on the comparison of the original and actual project milestone schedules above, project is (select only one) :

Start Date
Construction
Design
FA Milestones
SECTION 3 : QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT
End Date

1. DELIVERABLES & MILESTONES
Original FA Schedule in Scope of Work
List all deliverables and milestones as stated in the FA, with start and end dates. Calculate the total project duration. DO NOT CHANGE THE ORIGINAL FA MILESTONE START AND END DATES SHOWN IN THE 2 ND AND 3 RD COLUMNS BELOW.

Grantees must make every effort to accurately portray milestone dates in the original FA Scope of Work, since this will provide the basis for calculating any project delay. If milestone start and/or end dates change from those stated in the Original FA Scope of Work, indicate the new dates under Actual Schedule below and re- calculate the project duration. However, this does not change the original milestones in your FA. PER YOUR FA AGREEMENT, ANY CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SCHEDULE MUST BE FORMALLY SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER TO LACMTA FOR WRITTEN CONCURRENCE.

Right-of-Way Acquisition
Actual Schedule
Environmental
Others
Vehicle Purchase

12.06.19 3
Measure M Funding Agreement - MSP
Attachment D-2 Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report

3. TASKS / MILESTONES ACCOMPLISHED
If the project is delayed (as described in #4), include action items that have been, or will be, undertaken to resolve the delay.

6. UPCOMING QUARTERLY TASKS / MILESTONES
List tasks or milestones expected to be accomplished next quarter.

7. PLAN EXPENDITURES
List tasks or milestones accomplished and progress made this quarter.

4. PROJECT DELAY
If project is delayed, describe reasons for delay (this quarter). Pay particular attention to schedule delays. If delay is for the same reason as mentioned in previous quarters, please indicate by writing "Same as Previous Quarter".

5. ACTION ITEMS TO RESOLVE DELAY

12.06.19 4
Measure M Funding Agreement - MSP
Attachment D-2 Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report
Provide expected expenditures (estimated) for next quarter.

12.06.19 5
Measure M Funding Agreement - MSP
Attachment D-2 Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 Invoice Payment Information:

Signature Date
Name Title
and that to the best of my knowledge and belief the information I certify that I am the responsible Project Manager or fiscal officer and representative of SECTION 4. ITEMIZED LISTING OF EXPENSES AND CHARGES THIS QUARTER INVOICE #
All expenses and charges must be itemized and listed below. Each item listed must be verifiable by an invoice and/or other proper documentation.

The total amounts shown here must be equal to this quarter’s expenditures listed on page 1 of this report. All expenses and charges must be reflective of the approved budget and rates as shown in the FA Attachment B, Scope of Work. Use additional pages if needed.

ITEM
-$
LACMTA will make all disbursements electronically unless an exception is requested in writing. Reimbursements via Automated Clearing House (ACH) will be made at no cost to GRANTEE. GRANTEE must register in LACMTA's iSupplier portal and submit an application before grant payments can be made. The link to the portal can be found at http://media.metro.net/uploads/EBB/Vendor Portal Registration.pdf.

Written exception requests for Check Payments should be completed and emailed to Accounts Payable at [email protected].

TOTAL EXPENSES CHARGED TO LACMTA MEASURE

M GRANT
Invoice
Reference
Pg(s)
stated in this report is true and correct.

All receipts, invoices, and time sheets, attached and included with this Expense Report must be listed and shown under the Invoice Number column of the Itemized Listing (above).

Note:

TOTAL

12.06.19 6
Measure M Funding Agreement - MSP
Attachment D-2 Quarterly Progress/Expenditure Report

CITY OF CARSON 701 East Carson Street
Report to Honorable Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 5:00 PM
CONSENT 42. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Dr. Arlington Rodgers, Director of Public Works PW Engineering Subject: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 25-052, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CARSONCITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET IN THE GENERAL FUND AND SPECIALREVENUE FUNDS FOR PROJECT NO. 1786 CITY HALL BATHROOMS AND KITCHENETTE RENOVATIONS I. SUMMARY
Project No. 1786 - City Hall Bathroom and Kitchenette Renovations is part of the City’s FY 24/25 Capital Improvement Program. This project includes the renovation of all the bathrooms and kitchenettes on the ﬁrst ﬂoor and second ﬂoor of City Hall, adding more stalls and sinks for staff and public use. On September 17, 2024, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Caltec Corporation (Caltec) for this Project in the amount of $1,697,000.00. No contingency fund was authorized for this project when the contract was awarded. On April 1, 2025, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to Public Works Agreement with Caltec Corporation for an additional amount of $198,475.52 to cover the costs for work due to unforeseen conditions.

As the project continues to progress, design revisions become an essential part of ensuring that the ﬁnal outcome meets the expectations of all stakeholders. Recently, the Mayor of the City of Carson suggested design changes on the ongoing restroom and kitchenette work, which requires a design revision and a change in the scope of work. As a result of recent design changes, staff is anticipating additional scope of work totaling approximately $450,000.

Staff requests that the City Council approve additional funding in the amount not to exceed $450,000.00 for Project No.1786: City Hall Bathroom and Kitchenette Renovations to cover the anticipated costs of the added work. Staff will effectuate implementation of the newly designed improvements via change order.

II. RECOMMENDATION
ADOPT Resolution No. 25-052 “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CARSON CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET IN THE GENERAL FUND AND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS" to increase project PW1786 budget authority by $450,000.00. (EXHIBIT NO. 1).

III. ALTERNATIVES

1. DO NOT APPROVE additional funding in the amount of $450,000.00. However, staff will not have suﬃcient funds to complete design changes as requested by the City for Project No. 1786.

2. TAKE another action the City Council deems appropriate consistent with the requirements of the law.

IV. BACKGROUND
Project No. 1786: City Hall Bathroom and Kitchenette Renovations is included in the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) list. This project includes the renovation of existing men and women restrooms and kitchenettes on the ground ﬂoor and second ﬂoor of City Hall building, adding more stalls and sinks for staff and public use, to meet current ADA standards . Demolition and design plans were prepared by BOA Architecture.

On September 17, 2024, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Caltec Corporation for Project No.1786: City Hall Bathroom and Kitchenette Renovations, in the amount of $1,697,000.00. No contingency fund was authorized for this project when the contract was awarded.

On April 1, 2025, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to Public Works Agreement with Caltec Corporation for an additional amount of $198,475.52 to cover the costs for design revisions due to unforeseen conditions.

As construction has progressed, design modiﬁcations have been requested by the Mayor. Subsequently, staff was directed to make additional design changes on the ongoing restroom and kitchenette work, which requires work outside of the original scope of work.

The Design Modiﬁcations Include:

Additional wall tile in the 2nd ﬂoor lobby men’s and women’s restroom.

Replacing the single large mirror in the 2nd ﬂoor lobby women’s restroom with two single mirrors, one above each sink.

Remove and replace the 2nd ﬂoor lobby men’s and women’s restroom toilet compartments with an alternate style and color to match the sink veneer.

Remove and replace the 2nd ﬂoor lobby women’s restroom water heater door with an alternate style that includes louvers.

Revise the design, layout, and color of all the 1st ﬂoor restroom toilet compartments.

Redesign the city council single occupant restroom with alternate ﬁnishes and layout.

Redesign the city council break room with alternate ﬁnishes, layout, new ceiling, new painted walls, and a recessed TV display.

These changes will necessitate additional funding to allow contractor to continue to work. While the architect is revising the plans, staff has been collaborating with the contractor to determine the added costs. It is anticipated that the additional work will result in the need for approximately $450,000.00 in additional funding. However, it should be noted that this is an estimate while staff is waiting for the revised plan, and the actual cost will be determined once the request for a change order is received from the contractor.

This increase in cost exceeds 25% of the original construction cost of $1,697,000.00. The Public Works agreement adopts the 2021 "Greenbook". Under section 2-7.1 of the "Greenbook," changes initiated by an agency exceeding 25% of the contract price shall be by written Supplemental Agreement between the contractor and agency, unless both parties agree to proceed with the changes by Change Order. The additional work resulting from the recent design changes has been discussed with the contractor, who has agreed to proceed with this work under a change order. Staff will effectuate implementation of the newly designed improvements via change order, continue to assess the impact of these changes, and coordinate accordingly to ensure all necessary approvals and documentation, such as change orders, are properly addressed in alignment with contract requirements.

Staff is requesting City Council to approve the additional funds in the amount of $450,000.00 to cover the cost for the Mayor's requested design modiﬁcations and changes in the scope of work. It should be noted that staff is recommended the use of Development Impact Fee (DIF) funds to cover some of the costs of this amendment.

Development impact fees are a one-time charge to new development imposed under the Mitigation Fee Act. These fees are charged to new development to mitigate impacts resulting from the development activity and cannot be used to fund existing deﬁciencies. This means that for improvements that beneﬁt existing as well as new development, impact fees can only pay for the portion of the improvement that beneﬁts the new uses. The project scope includes the expansion of existing facilities through the addition of toilet stalls and sinks, as well as kitchenette sinks and associated appliances for staff and public use. As such, DIF funds are permissible to use for funding this scope of work.

V. FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed amendment No. 2 with Caltec is for an additional $450,000.00. If the amendment is approved by Council, the requested funds will be allocated to project expenditure account 289-80-820-904-8008-PW1786 per the proposed Resolution 25-052.

VI. EXHIBITS

1. Resolution No. 25-052
Prepared by: Dr. Arlington Rodgers,Jr. Director of Public Works, Gilbert M. Marquez, P.E., City Engineer and VictorLopez, P.E., Associate Civil Engineer

Attachments
Resolution No. 25-052

RESOLUTION NO. 25-052

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CARSON CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET IN THE GENERAL FUND AND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2024-25 (FY24-25) budget on June 18, 2024 for the General Fund and Special Revenue Funds of the City via Resolution No. 24-056; and

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the FY2024-25 budget; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it necessary to amend the FY2024-25 General Fund budget and Special Revenue Funds budget.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, FIND, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The following amendment(s) will be made to the City’s FY2024-25 budget.

Account Description Increase/(Decrease)
289-80-820-904-6004-PW1748 Professional Services ($300,000.00) 289-80-820-904-8009-PW1715 Infrastructure Roadways ($150,000.00) 289-80-820-904-8008-PW1786 Infrastructure other than Buildings $450,000.00

Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall keep a copy of this resolution attached to the FY2024-25 budget on file, and effective as of May 6, 2025 the same shall be in force and effect.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 2025.

APPROVED

_________________________ ________________________
Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney Lula Davis-Holmes, Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF CARSON )
I, Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk of the City of Carson, California, hereby attest to and certify that the foregoing resolution, being Resolution No. 25-052 adopted by the City of Carson City Council at its meeting held on May 6, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMEBES:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

_____________________________
Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk
CITY OF CARSON 701 East Carson Street
Report to Honorable Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 5:00 PM
CONSENT 43. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Dr. Arlington Rodgers, Director of Public Works PW Engineering Subject: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENTWITH TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC TO PROVIDE ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES TO THEPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (CITY COUNCIL) I. SUMMARY
The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department is responsible for the design and construction of a number of projects including several that are grant funded. In an effort to enhance the capacity of the Engineering Division to deliver projects in a timely manner, staff solicited on-call professional engineering services. At its September 2022 Council meeting, the City Council approved a three-year contract for a not-to-exceed contract sum of $900,000 with Tait & Associates (Tait) to provide on-call professional engineering services. The initial contract with Tait was established based on estimated needs at that time. However, due to the increasing number of capital projects programmed for the next ﬁscal years, the continuous and increased need for the services of the on-call consultant was determined to be necessary.

It is requested that the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Contract Services Agreement with Tait to provide on-call professional engineering services, increasing the contract sum by $350,000 for a new total not-to- exceed contract sum of $1,250,000. The additional services constitute a change order under Section 2611(m)(2) of the City’s Municipal Code and accordingly, City is authorized to enter into this Amendment No. 1 without solicitation for the same.

II. RECOMMENDATION
TAKE the following actions:

1. APPROVE Amendment No. 1 to the Contract Services Agreement with Tait & Associates for on-call professional engineering services increasing the contract sum by $350,000 for a total contract sum of $1,250,000.00.

2. AUTHORIZE the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 with Tait & Associates following approval as to form by the City Attorney.

III. ALTERNATIVES

1. DO NOT APPROVE Amendment No. 1 to the Contract Services Agreement with Tait & Associates.

2. TAKE another action the City Council deems appropriate consistent with the requirements of the Law.

IV. BACKGROUND
The City’s 5-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was approved by the City Council on June 18, 2024. It is anticipated that the complexity and number of projects listed on the City’s CIP over the next ﬁve years will increase as compared to the previously approved 5-year CIP plans. Given the higher demand of CIP projects, there is an increased need for on-call consultants to assist with the development of plans, speciﬁcations, and estimates. The use of consultants is not in-lieu of using full-time employees, rather these consultants will be utilized to enhance the capacity of the current staff. In addition, there are several engineering related projects that currently require the services of consultants to meet the grant funding criteria.

To address the enhanced needs of the City, staff issued an RFP 22-109 soliciting on-call consultants. At its September 2022 Council meeting, the City Council approved a three-year contract for a not-to-exceed contract sum of $900,000 with Tait & Associates (Tait) to provide on-call professional engineering services.

Tait has experienced personnel and support team members that have expertise in the many facets of civil engineering, planning, and design services including roadways, utilities, drainage, surveying, and mapping, site development, and site remediation. They also provide review of environmental planning documents, tentative and ﬁnal maps, and site development plans for grading, buildings, landscaping, and street improvements. With 220 associates, they have the right blend of professional engineers, architects, surveyors, associates, environmental assessors, and construction personnel with the experience necessary to address critical and big picture concerns.

Given that multiple public works projects are anticipated to be added to the future CIP list, the enhanced services of Tait will be needed to implement those projects. There are currently pending task orders totaling approximately $350,000 for three different projects within the city that require the services of Tait. The existing balance in the current contract is insuﬃcient to cover the cost associated with these required services. In order to move forward with the award of the task orders, approval from the city council is requested.

Staff requests the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Contract Services Agreement with Tait to provide on-call professional engineering services, increasing the contract sum by $350,000 for a new total not-to-exceed contract sum of $1,250,000 to provide increased professional service support and assist City staff needs in managing the capital projects.

V. FISCAL IMPACT
If the proposed amendment is approved, the Tait & Associates contract will be increased by an additional $350,000.00 for a new total not-to-exceed contract amount of $1,250,000.00.

The requested three hundred and ﬁfty thousand ($350,000.00) for the proposed Tait contract amendment will utilize funds currently allocated in the adopted FY 24/25 budget in account 101-99-999-904-6004.

VI. EXHIBITS

1. Tait & Associates Original Contract

2. Tait Contract Amendment No. 1
Prepared by: Gilbert Marquez, P.E., City Engineering

Attachments
TAIT & ASSOCIATES INC Original Contract Agreement
Tait On Call Engineering Amendment No. 1

AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES

BETWEEN THE CITY OF CARSON AND
TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC.

THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this Ist_ day of January, 2023 by and between the CITY OF CARSON, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC., a California corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals or Invitation for Bids, the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.

B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services.

C. Pursuant to the City of Carson’s Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement.

D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder.

As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest 01007.0006/805662. -l-

- 1 -
01007.0006/1060917.1
AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES

THIS AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
(“Amendment No. 1”) by and between the CITY OF CARSON, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC., a California corporation (“Consultant”) is effective as of the ____ day of __________, 2025.

RECITALS

A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement for Contractual Services dated January 1, 2023 (“Agreement”) whereby Consultant agreed to provide On-Call Professional Engineering Services , generally relating to implementing various City capital improvement projects which may involve streets, storm drains, sewers, traffic signals, park facilities, as well as City Hall, Community Center, and other City-owned facilities, for three (3) years at a total Contract Sum of $900,000.00. The Agreement allows City to extend the Term by one (1) year at an additional not to exceed amount of $300,000.00.

B. City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement to increase the contract amount by $350,000.00 to allow Consultant to perform more of the contracted for services than originally anticipated to be needed by the City (“Additional Services”).

C. The Additional Services constitute a change order under Section 2611(m)(2) of the City’s Municipal Code and accordingly, City is authorized to enter into this Amendment No. 1 without solicitation for the same.

TERMS

1. Contract Changes. The Agreement is amended as provided herein (new text in bold italics and deleted text in strikethrough).

A. Section 2.1 “Contract Sum,” of the Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

“2.1 Contract Sum

Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the "Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars ($900,000) One Million Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($1,250,000.00) for the Term (the "Contract Sum"), and Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000) for the Extension Term if City's option is exercised pursuant to Section 3.4, unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.8.”

B. Section IV of Exhibit “C,” “Schedule of Compensation,” is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
- 2 -
01007.0006/1060917.1

“IV. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $900,000 $1,250,000.00 for the initial three-year Term of this Agreement , and $300,000 for the Extension Term, as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement, and as amended in Exhibit "B."”

2. Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 1, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 1, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 1.

3. Affirmation of Agreement; Warranty Re Absence of Defaults. City and Consultant each ratify and reaffirm each and every one of the respective rights and obligations arising under the Agreement. Each party represents and warrants to the other that there have been no written or oral modifications to the Agreement. Each party represents and warrants to the other that the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 1, is currently an effective, valid, and binding obligation.

Consultant represents and warrants to City that, as of the date of this Amendment No. 1, City is not in default of any material term of the Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the Agreement.

City represents and warrants to Consultant that, as of the date of this Amendment No. 1, Consultant is not in default of any material term of the Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the Agreement.

4. Adequate Consideration. The parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment No. 1.

5. Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 1, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 1, and (iv) the entering into this Amendment No. 1 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound.

6. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original, whether the signatures are originals, electronic, facsimiles or digital. All such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same Amendment No. 1.

- 3 -
01007.0006/1060917.1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF CARSON, a municipal
corporation

____________________________
Lula Davis-Holmes, Mayor
ATTEST:

_________________________________
Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP

_________________________________
Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney
[vas; rjl]
CONSULTANT:

TAIT & ASSOCIATES, a California
corporation
By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S SIGNATURES

SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS

MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY. 01007.0006/1060917.1 4

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

On __________, 2025 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: _____________________________________

OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT

INDIVIDUAL

CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________

TITLE(S)

PARTNER(S) LIMITED

GENERAL

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

TRUSTEE(S)

___________________________________

TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________

DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: _____________________________________

OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT

INDIVIDUAL

CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________

TITLE(S)

PARTNER(S) LIMITED

GENERAL

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

TRUSTEE(S)

___________________________________

TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________

DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed h d hi h hi ifi i h d d h hf l lidi f h d CITY OF CARSON 701 East Carson Street
Report to Honorable Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 5:00 PM
CONSENT 44. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Dr. Arlington Rodgers, Director of Public Works PW Engineering Subject: CONSIDER APPROVING AMENDMENT NO.4 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENTWITH RKA CONSULTING GROUP FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR PROJECT 675 SEPULVEDA BRIDGEWIDENING PROJECT (CITY COUNCIL).

I. SUMMARY
This action would approve a Fourth Amendment to a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with RKA Consulting Group Inc. (RKA) for additional design services and engineering support during construction of Project No. 675 – Sepulveda Bridge Widening from Alameda Street to the East City Limit (Exhibit No. 1).

During the late part of the design phase of the bridge widening project, utility lines were discovered to be in conﬂict with the proposed structural improvement. The unexpected utility conﬂicts have led to the need for additional professional services, including further engineering design, utility coordination, and revision of construction plans to address these unforeseen conditions.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with RKA Consulting to provide an additional $57,500 in funding. These additional funds will cover the cost of the additional professional services required as a result of the changes in the project scope due to the discovery of interfering utility lines and the necessary adjustments to the bridge's pile design.

II. RECOMMENDATION
TAKE the following actions:

1. APPROVE Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with RKA Corporation for additional design services in the amount of $57,500 for Project 675: Sepulveda Bridge Widening Project, thereby increasing the total not-to-exceed contract sum to $934,938.

2. AUTHORIZE the Mayor to execute the contract amendment, following approval as to form by the City Attorney.

III. ALTERNATIVES
TAKE another action the City Council deems appropriate consistent with the requirements of the Law.

IV. BACKGROUND
The City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) calls for the design and construction of Project. 675: Sepulveda Boulevard Bridge Widening from Alameda Street to the East City Limit. The project involves the widening and improvement of the roadway and bridge along Sepulveda Boulevard to provide three lanes of traﬃc in both directions, construction of new sidewalk, relocation of existing Southern California Edison’s (SCE) electrical lines, and the modiﬁcation of existing traﬃc signals. This critical infrastructure project aims to enhance traﬃc ﬂow, pedestrian safety, and overall transportation eﬃciency along Sepulveda Boulevard.

On May 1, 2016 the project scope was increased to account for additional roadway widening expanding the scope of the project which was initiated by Amendment No. 1. The project was halted due to loss of grant funding in 2017. In 2019 the city was awarded a multi-year grant and the project was restarted. On April 20, 2021 Amendment No. 2 was issued to address the design escalation cost due to changes in design codes and furthering the scope of Utility Management services provided by the design ﬁrm.

On August 1, 2023, the City Council approved Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with RKA Consulting Group Inc. for the additional design services and engineering support during construction. As the design phase of the project nearly gets completed, more utility lines have been discovered. These utility lines, which were previously undetected, require signiﬁcant adjustments to the design and construction plans to ensure the proposed improvements proceed without delay. In particular, additional work is required for the adjustment and relocation of piles needed to be driven as part of the bridge widening, which is critical to the project's success.

As a result, the project requires additional professional services to address the necessary design adjustments, coordinate with utility providers, and revise construction plans accordingly. These services will also ensure that any unforeseen circumstances are quickly addressed and that the project continues on schedule.

The City has been working on the Sepulveda bridge widening project, which involves signiﬁcant structural improvements aimed at enhancing safety and traﬃc ﬂow. The design phase has now been completed, and bids for the construction phase have been received. Staff is reviewing the bids and looking to award the construction contract of the project in the near future.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with RKA Consulting for an additional amount of $57,500 to cover the cost of the construction support and the additional services due to the discovery of interfering utility lines.

V. FISCAL IMPACT
If the proposed amendment is approved by City Council, $57,500 will be added to the Professional Services Agreement with RKA for a new total not-to-exceed contract sum of $934,938.00. Funds in the amount of $57,500.00 are available in the adopted FY 2024-2025 budget within account 101-80-820-100-6004.

VI. EXHIBITS

1. Proposed Amendment No. 4
Prepared by: Dr. Arlington Rodgers, PhD, Director of Public Works; Gilbert M. Marquez, P.E., City Engineer; KennethYoung, P.E., Sr. Civil Engineer

Attachments
RKA Consulting Amendment 4.pdf

AMENDMENT NO. 4

TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES

THIS AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
(“Amendment No. 4”) by and between the CITY OF CARSON, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and RKA CONSULTING GROUP, a California corporation (“Consultant” or “Engineer”) is effective as of the ____ day of _______, 2025. City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City and Consultant entered into that certain Professional Services Agreement for preparation of Construction Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) (“Agreement”) dated January 15, 2013, whereby Consultant agreed to prepare certain construction plans, specifications and estimates (“PS&E”) for City’s Project No. 675: Sepulveda Boulevard Widening from Alameda Street to the East City Limit (“Project”), a project for widening Sepulveda Boulevard from Alameda Street to the East City Limit, for a Contract Sum of $187,600; and B. City and Consultant entered into an amendment to the Agreement dated May 17, 2016 (“Amendment No. 1”), whereby Consultant prepared certain expanded scope of PS&E for the City for an additional amount of $244,693, thereby increasing the total Contract Sum to $432,293; and
C. Extensive work had been completed by Consultant on the Scope of Services required by the Agreement and Amendment No. 1, but because City lost its grant funding source, the Project was halted in 2017; and
D. In 2019, City was awarded a Measure “M” Multi-Year Sub-regional Program grant in the amount of $6,019,999 for the completion of the PS&E and construction of the Project; and E. City and Consultant entered into a second amendment to the Agreement dated April 20, 2021 (“Amendment No. 2”) to: (i) again expand the Scope of Services to be performed by Consultant; (ii) increase the total compensation to be paid by City to Consultant by an amount of $223,950, thereby increasing the total Contract Sum to $656,243; and (iii) amend the schedule of performance to clarify that the services to be provided by Consultant will not be completed unless and until City deems them to be complete and are accepted by City.

F. City and Consultant entered into a third amendment to the Agreement dated August 15, 2023 (“Amendment No. 3”) to: (i) increase the total compensation to be paid by City to Consultant by an additional amount of $221,195, thereby increasing the total Contract Sum to $877,438, to allow Consultant to conduct and complete additional services; and (ii) establish a date certain of December 31, 2026 for expiration of the Agreement term. The additional services were needed for historic bridge research and construction support, and due to requirements imposed by Los Angeles County Department of Public Works and the Storm Water Engineering Division, which require that additional elements be incorporated into the final design ready for construction identified during Final Plan check. These included additional space for utility relocation and

modeling of the Dominguez Channel to include analysis of a 100-year storm event and associated channel breach.

G. City and Consultant now desire to amend the Agreement to again expand the Scope of Services to be performed by Consultant and increase the total compensation by an amount not to exceed $57,500, thereby increasing the total Contract Sum to $934,938.

TERMS

1. Contract Changes. The Agreement is amended as provided herein (strikethrough represents deleted language while bold italics represents added language).

A. Section 9 (Compensation) is hereby amended as follows:
“Payment shall be made by Owner to Engineer for the services and work performed hereunder within thirty (30) days following receipt and approval by Owner of original invoices therefor. Engineer’s fees and charges for the services and work performed shall be invoiced monthly, or at such other intervals as may be mutually agreed upon, and said fees and charges shall in no event exceed Nine Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty-Eight Dollars ($934,938) Eight Hundred Seventy-Seven Thousand Four Hundred Thirty-Eight Dollars ($877,438) as set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part hereof.

B. Exhibit “A” (Scope of Services) is hereby amended by adding to the end thereof the professional services attached hereto as Exhibit “A- 3” (“Amendment No. 4 Scope of Work”).

C. Section I of Exhibit “C” (Schedule of Compensation) is hereby amended as follows:
“The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed $934,938 $877,438 as provided in Section 9 of this Agreement.”

2. Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2, Amendment No. 3 and this Amendment No. 4, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 4, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2, Amendment No. 3 and this Amendment No.

4. 3. Affirmation of Agreement; Warranty Re Absence of Defaults. City and Consultant each ratify and reaffirm each and every one of the respective rights and obligations arising under the Agreement, Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3. Each party represents and warrants to the other that there have been no written or oral modifications to the Agreement other than as provided herein, Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3. Each party represents and warrants to the other that the Agreement, as amended

by Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3, is currently an effective, valid, and binding obligation.

Consultant represents and warrants to City that, as of the date of this Amendment No. 4, City is not in default of any material term of the Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the Agreement.

City represents and warrants to Consultant that, as of the date of this Amendment No. 4, Consultant is not in default of any material term of the Agreement and that there have been no events that, with the passing of time or the giving of notice, or both, would constitute a material default under the Agreement.

5. Authority. The persons executing this Amendment No. 4 on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 4 on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Amendment No. 4, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Amendment No. 4, and (iv) the entering into this Amendment No. 4 does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said party is bound.

6. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 4 may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original, whether the signatures are originals, electronic, facsimiles or digital. All such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same Amendment No. 4.

[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 4 on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF CARSON, a California municipal
corporation

Lula Davis-Holmes, Mayor

ATTEST:

Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP

Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney
[rjl; mav]
CONSULTANT:

RKA CONSULTING GROUP, a California
corporation

By:

Name:

Title:

By:

Name:

Title:

SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS

MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE

On __________, 2025 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: _____________________________________

OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT

INDIVIDUAL

CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________

TITLE(S)

PARTNER(S) LIMITED

GENERAL

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

TRUSTEE(S)

___________________________________

TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________

DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE

On __________, 2025 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: _____________________________________

OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT

INDIVIDUAL

CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________

TITLE(S)

PARTNER(S) LIMITED

GENERAL

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

TRUSTEE(S)

___________________________________

TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________

DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE

EXHIBIT “A-3”

AMENDMENT NO. 4 SCOPE OF WORK

I. Through its subconsultant, PacRim Engineering, Consultant will provide the following additional design work (“Services”):

A. Incorporate Isolation Casing – The pile at the Southwest corner of Abutment I is close to the existing Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) Reinforced Concrete Box (RCB) drain. Isolation casings are required for the pile due to the LACFCD guidelines for Overbuilding and Air Rights which indicate a caisson/sleeve is required for the piles in close proximity to the existing drain. The comment was received from LA County Public Works and results in re-work of the pile foundation design calculations and incorporation of isolation casing details. This requires further coordination with the geotechnical engineer for additional recommendations to consider the pile capacity considering isolation casing.

B. Oil Line Conflict Resolution – Eight (8) oil lines with the piles at the Southeast abutment requires more time to develop the concept sketch for three (3) potential pile relocation options.

CITY OF CARSON 701 East Carson Street
Report to Honorable Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 5:00 PM
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY 45. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Duane Cobb, Housing Analyst CM/Housing CMO Housing & Neighborhood Subject: CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2025-2029 HOUSING AND URBANDEVELOPMENT (HUD) FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN, 2025-2029 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCKGRANT (CDBG) ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (AAP) I. SUMMARY
The City of Carson, as a recipient of Community Development Block Grant funding from the federal government, is required to prepare a Five-Year Consolidated Plan and an Annual Action Plan for the use of those resources. This public hearing is an opportunity to elicit public input into the development of these related documents.

The Consolidated Plan is a ﬁve-year planning document that identiﬁes needs within low- to moderate-income (LMI) communities and outlines how the City will address those needs. Ultimately, it guides investments and helps achieve HUD’s mission of providing decent housing, creating suitable living environments, and expanding economic opportunities for LMI populations. Jurisdictions participating in any of the following HUD funding programs must submit a Consolidated Plan every ﬁve years:

Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) – CDBG is a ﬂexible federal funding source that can be used for both housing and non-housing activities, including neighborhood revitalization, workforce and economic development, community and nonproﬁt facilities, and infrastructure and public services in LMI communities.

HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) – HOME is used for building, acquiring, and rehabilitating affordable housing for rent and homeownership. It may also be used for direct rental assistance to low-income residents.

Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) – ESG funds programs and services supporting people experiencing homelessness. This includes operating shelters, providing essential services to shelter residents, administering rapid rehousing programs, and delivering homelessness prevention services.

Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) – HOPWA supports low-income people living with HIV/AIDS and their families by providing affordable housing opportunities.

II. RECOMMENDATION
TAKE the following actions:

1. OPEN the public hearing, TAKE public testimony, and CLOSE the public hearing.

2. ALLOCATE CDBG funding for FY 2025/26 (Planning Year 2025).

3. AUTHORIZE the Mayor to execute agreements with the public service providers as designated by City Council following negotiation and approval as to form by the City Attorney.

4. APPROVE the proposed FY 2025/26 (FY2025) CDBG budget.

5. APPROVE the submission of the City’s 2025-2029 Five-Year Consolidated Plan, 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan, and Citizen Participation Plan to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

III. ALTERNATIVES
TAKE another action the City Council deems appropriate and that is consistent with applicable laws.

IV. BACKGROUND
The City of Carson has been a recipient of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, each year since the act was enacted. CDBG funding can be used for projects and programs primarily beneﬁting persons of low and moderate income.

Guidelines established by HUD for jurisdictions participating in its formula grant programs, including CDBG, as found in Title 24 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Part 91 and Part 570, mandate the preparation and submission of a Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) every ﬁve years, and an Annual Action Plan (AAP) each year. The ConPlan can be viewed as a strategic plan for the use of CDBG funds as well as other resources that the City devotes toward the achievement of similar objectives over a ﬁve-year period, with the AAP constituting the annual update of that strategy. HUD will evaluate the ConPlan and AAP against three basic objectives for the CDBG program:

Provision of decent housing,
Provision of a suitable living environment, and
Provision of expanded economic opportunities.

Essentially, a ConPlan consists of the following components:

Consultations with public and private agencies regarding housing and non-housing issues; A housing and market analysis describing the City's demographics, housing and facilities and services for the homeless as well as non homeless persons with special needs; Assessment of housing and non-housing community development needs of the City; and Five-year strategies for such issues as affordable housing and homelessness, non-housing community development, and housing.

It is estimated that HUD will allocate the City $660,108.00 in CDBG entitlement funding for Program Year 2025 (City Fiscal Year 2025/26). The City’s most recent ConPlan was submitted in 2020 and covers CDBG Program Years 2020 through 2024 (encompassing the period beginning July 1, 2020, and ending June 30, 2024). The City must now submit to HUD a new ConPlan for Program Years 2025 through 2029 (encompassing the period beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2029). As it has done each year, the City must also submit an AAP for Program Year 2025 (the period beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026), which, as the ﬁrst year of the ConPlan cycle, will be included as part of the ConPlan. The ConPlan was prepared with the assistance of a consulting ﬁrm, RSG Solutions, Inc. Based on the estimate, $132,021.60 will be allotted to Administration; $429,070.20 to Capital Improvement; and $94,977 to Public Services. The City will adjust the estimated amounts proportionally to match the actual allocation amounts once announced (please see Exhibit #3, 2025-2026 CDBG Proposed Summary Table).

The HUD regulations regarding ConPlans and AAPs mandate a citizen participation and public review process.

This includes a minimum of two public hearings prior to the submission of a ConPlan or an AAP. City staff and RSG Solutions, Inc. convened two public input sessions on the ConPlan and AAP; a virtual community input meeting on January 15, 2025, and an in-person community input meeting January 27, 2025.

Drafts of the ConPlan and AAP were made available on March 4, 2025, with public hearing taking place on March 18, 2025. Subsequently, the drafts are then subjected to a HUD-mandated 30-day public review and comment period which begins on March 19, 2025, and concludes on April 21, 2025.

CDBG Public Service Subrecipient Process
Each year, considerable public interest is devoted to the allocation of CDBG funds for eligible community public services. Per CDBG regulations, public service funding is restricted to no more than 15% of the annual entitlement allocation (that is, $99,016.20 for FY 2025-2026).

To qualify as a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) subrecipient in the City of Carson, an organization must meet speciﬁc eligibility requirements in accordance with HUD regulations (24 CFR Part 570) and local CDBG program guidelines. Eligible subrecipients include private nonproﬁt organizations (501(c)(3)), public agencies, and certain for-proﬁt entities that provide eligible public services beneﬁting low- and moderate-income (LMI) residents or addressing urgent community development needs. Staff notiﬁed over twenty organizations, including some based locally in Carson, regarding the application process and relevant deadline.

As stated in the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) documents that were disseminated as part of the program application, HUD requires that public service organizations shall not target or serve any single ethnic population.

Discrimination of any kind in the rendering of public services shall be cause for the rejection of a proposal.

Organizations whose primary purpose is to beneﬁt members of a particular ethnic group are not prohibited from applying for CDBG funds, but the program for which CDBG funds are sought must be open to persons outside that ethnic group. Religious or faith-based organizations are advised that Federal funding may not be used to support any religious activities or religious inﬂuence in the delivery of public services.

Additionally, any organization that applies to be considered for funding are required to demonstrate ﬁnancial and administrative capacity to manage federal funds, maintain compliance with HUD reporting and monitoring requirements, and adhere to federal regulations, including OMB’s Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200). Additionally, subrecipients must provide a measurable public beneﬁt to the community at large, ensure non-discriminatory service delivery, and document that at least 51% of program beneﬁciaries meet HUD’s LMI criteria. Compliance with environmental reviews, Section 504 (disability accessibility), and Section 3 (economic opportunities for low-income individuals) is also required. Applicants must submit a detailed program proposal, budget, organizational history, proof of nonproﬁt status (if applicable), and evidence of insurance coverage to be considered for funding.

Also, the following criteria are used in evaluating requests for public service funding:

The organization is viable, stable, and exhibits the administrative capacity to successfully complete a project history and performance including ﬁndings and/or corrections.

The service directly beneﬁts extremely low, low, and moderate income Carson residents.

The organization has a process in place to measure the amount of assistance provided to Carson residents.

The service will not duplicate or overlap an existing service.

The organization has other sources of funding to match or supplement the City’s CDBG funding.

The CDBG funding provided will be used for client services, not on-going administrative expenses.

CDBG public service funds (15% cap) cannot be rolled over from one program year to the next. The 15% cap for public services is based on each program year's total CDBG allocation, plus program income received in that year.

Jurisdictions must obligate and expend public service funds within the speciﬁed timeline, or they risk losing access to those funds. If public service funds are not fully utilized, they are typically reallocated to eligible CDBG activities in the following year but not added to the new 15% cap. This means unused public service funds could be reassigned to housing rehabilitation, infrastructure, or other eligible CDBG categories that do not have percentage caps (i.e. Neighborhood Pride Program).

A request for proposals (RFP) for public service providers was issued on January 14, 2025, with a response deadline of February 9, 2025. That RFP generated four responses, from the following entities:

Public Service Requests FY 2025/26
Fair Housing Foundation has requested $36,627.00
Housing Rights Center has requested $34,977.00
Boys & Girls Club of Carson has requested $40,000.00
Venice Family Clinic has requested $20,000.00
Subsequent to the Council Meeting of March 18, 2025, the City of Carson reopened the application window to submit proposals for the 2025-2026 CDBG via public Notice of Funding Availability. Beginning March 19, 2025 through Wednesday April 9, 2025 all interested parties were invited to submit descriptive program proposals and a required city application. All completed proposals and applications needed to be received no later than 12:00 P.M. on Wednesday, April 9, 2025.

Additional Public Service Requests FY 2025/26
Carson Hope Community Church has requested $16,000.00
Staff is recommending meeting the requested amounts for Boys & Girls Club of Carson and Venice Family Clinic.

If it is the Council’s pleasure, staff would like to recommend selecting the Housing Rights Center (HRC) as the Fair Housing provider for Public Service FY 2025/26. This recommendation is based on HRC’s expanded availability of in-person walk-in clinics, ensuring greater accessibility for Carson constituents who prefer direct, face-to-face assistance over online consultations. Additionally, HRC offers in-house legal services, enhanced referral resources, and dedicated staff support for both tenants and property owners, providing a higher level of comprehensive fair housing assistance. Carson Hope Community Church is ineligible for CDBG funding per HUD regulations.

All recommendations are based on the projected Public Services allotment from HUD. If the actual HUD allocation varies from the estimate recommendations will be adjusted proportionately, subject to the 15% cap. Remaining funds, if any, will be added to the Capital Improvement allocation.

The draft ConPlan issued for public review and comment (Exhibit No. 1) includes the recommended Program Year 2025-2026 AAP allocations. The CDBG Program Year 2025-2026 Action Plan is also included as part of Exhibit No.

1. These services are critical in assisting the City in fulﬁlling the aforementioned mandate to aﬃrmatively further fair housing, and in executing the Citizen Participation Plan (Exhibit No. 2).

Exhibit No. 3 (Proposed Project Summary Table) is a capsule summary of the funding requests and Exhibit No. 4 (2025-2026 CDBG Estimated Public Service Allocations) details Public Service requests and recommended allocations.

V. FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed action would allocate the FY 2025-2026 estimated grant of $660,108.00.

No impact to the General Fund is anticipated.

VI. EXHIBITS

1. Draft 2025-2029 Five-Year Consolidated Plan (pg. 4-132) and CDBG Program Year 2025-2026 Action Plan (pg.133-159)

2. Draft Citizen Participation Plan

3. 2025-2026 CDBG Proposed Project Summary Table

4. 2025-2026 CDBG Estimated Public Service Allocations

Attachments
Carson 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan (3.5.25 DRAFT).pdf
Carson Citizen Participation Plan (4.28.2025).pdf
2025-2026 CDBG Proposed Project Summary Table .pdf
2025-2026 CDBG Estimated Public Service Allocations.pdf

City of Carson

2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and
2025-2026 Annual Plan
DRAFT

Consolidated Plan CARSON 2
2025-2029
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 4 ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) ..................................................................4 The Process ........................................................................................................................... 8 PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b) .....................................................................8 PR-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(I) and 91.315(I) ..........................9 PR-15 Citizen Participation – 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c) ............................................ 14 Needs Assessment ............................................................................................................... 18 NA-05 Overview ........................................................................................................................... 18 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c) ............................................................. 20 NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) ................................... 34 NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) ....................... 37 NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens – 91.205 (b)(2) ............................. 40 NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion – 91.205(b)(2) ............................................... 42 NA-35 Public Housing – 91.205(b) ................................................................................................. 44 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205(c) ............................................................................ 50 NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b,d) ..................................................... 55 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 (f) ................................................. 59 Housing Market Analysis ..................................................................................................... 61 MA-05 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 61 MA-10 Number of Housing Units – 91.210(a)&(b)(2) ..................................................................... 62 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) ........................................................ 66 MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a) ............................................... 69 MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210(b) ............................................................................ 74 MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210(c) ...................................................................... 76 MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210(d)................................................................ 79 MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210(e) ........................................................................ 82 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f) ................................................ 83 MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion ............................................................................. 93 MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households -

91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2) ............................................................................................................. 98 MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3) ................................................................. 102

Consolidated Plan CARSON 3
2025-2029
Strategic Plan .................................................................................................................... 106 SP-05 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 106 SP-10 Geographic Priorities – 91.215 (a)(1) ................................................................................. 107 SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2) ............................................................................................. 108 SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions – 91.215 (b) ...................................................................... 110 SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2) .......................................................... 111 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure – 91.215(k) ....................................................................... 113 SP-45 Goals Summary – 91.215(a)(4) .......................................................................................... 117 SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement – 91.215(c) .................................................. 120 SP-55 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.215(h) ........................................................................ 121 SP-60 Homelessness Strategy – 91.215(d) ................................................................................... 123 SP-65 Lead-Based Paint Hazards – 91.215(i) ................................................................................ 126 SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy – 91.215(j) ...................................................................................... 128 SP-80 Monitoring – 91.230 ......................................................................................................... 130 Expected Resources ........................................................................................................... 133 AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c)(1,2) ................................................................................. 133 Annual Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................. 135 Projects ..................................................................................................................................... 137 AP-35 Projects – 91.220(d) ......................................................................................................... 137 AP-38 Project Summary.............................................................................................................. 139 AP-50 Geographic Distribution – 91.220(f) .................................................................................. 144 AP-55 Affordable Housing – 91.220(g) ........................................................................................ 145 AP-60 Public Housing – 91.220(h) ............................................................................................... 146 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities – 91.220(i) ................................................... 147 AP-75 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.220(j) ........................................................................ 151 AP-85 Other Actions – 91.220(k) ................................................................................................. 154 Program Specific Requirements ......................................................................................... 159

Consolidated Plan CARSON 4
2025-2029
Executive Summary
ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)

1. Introduction

As an entitlement jurisdiction under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the City of Carson (City) receives federal funds in proportion to its population size, concentration of poverty, and other socioeconomic and demographic data. To remain eligible for these funds, the City is required to submit a Consolidated Plan to HUD every five years. This document serves as Carson’s Consolidated Plan for the 2025 to 2029 Program Years.

The Consolidated Plan is a five-year planning document that identifies needs within low- to moderate-income (LMI) communities and outlines how the City will address those needs.

Ultimately, it guides investments and helps achieve HUD’s mission of providing decent housing, creating suitable living environments, and expanding economic opportunities for LMI populations. Jurisdictions participating in any of the following HUD funding programs must submit a Consolidated Plan every five years:

• Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) – CDBG is a flexible federal funding source that can be used for both housing and non-housing activities, including neighborhood revitalization, workforce and economic development, community and nonprofit facilities, and infrastructure and public services in LMI communities. • HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) – HOME is used for building, acquiring, and rehabilitating affordable housing for rent and homeownership. It may also be used for direct rental assistance to low-income residents.
• Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) – ESG funds programs and services supporting people experiencing homelessness. This includes operating shelters, providing essential services to shelter residents, administering rapid rehousing programs, and delivering homelessness prevention services.
• Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) – HOPWA supports low-income people living with HIV/AIDS and their families by providing affordable housing opportunities.

The City of Carson directly receives CDBG funding. The City anticipates receiving approximately $660,108 in CDBG funds annually over the next five program years, or $3,300,540 total.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 5
2025-2029
As the lead agency for the Consolidated Plan, the City of Carson follows HUD’s guidelines for citizen and community involvement and is responsible for overseeing citizen participation requirements that accompany the Consolidated Plan. The goals in this Consolidated Plan were developed through a collaborative process to identify the community's priority needs and outline the activities the City will undertake with these funds during the 2025 to 2029 period.

This Consolidated Plan includes the following components:
• A Needs Assessment that identifies the community’s affordable housing, community development, and homelessness needs.
• A Market Analysis that examines the existing housing market, public housing requirements, homeless population needs, and economic characteristics of the jurisdiction.
• A Strategic Plan outlining the strategies to address the identified priority needs over the next five years.
• An Annual Action Plan that summarizes the specific activities to be undertaken during the program year to address the priority needs.

2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview

The City established its goals and priorities for the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan based on the findings from the Needs Assessment and Market Analysis, as well as feedback gathered through community and stakeholder surveys and public input. Through these efforts, the City has identified four priority needs that will guide funding allocations and programmatic initiatives over the next five years.

The four priority needs for the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan cycle are:

• Affordable Housing: Assist in increasing and preserving access to high-quality affordable housing by investing in property rehabilitation.
• Community Services: Expand essential community services for vulnerable populations, including seniors, youth, and individuals with special needs. • Fair Housing Services: Broaden fair housing education by raising awareness of rights, fostering inclusivity, and eliminating barriers to access.

These priority needs represent the varied needs that emerged during the City’s Consolidated Plan community engagement and development process, which included qualitative and quantitative data gathered through citizen participation, market analysis, and assessment of Consolidated Plan CARSON 6
2025-2029
localized data. By aligning funding decisions with these priorities, the City seeks to maximize the impact of available resources and address the most urgent needs within the community.

3. Evaluation of past performance

As part of the Consolidated Plan process, the City is required to submit an annual Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), which reports on how funds were spent, the households that benefitted from the funds, and the progress toward meeting its annual goals for housing and community development activities. These reports are reviewed by the City of Carson City Council (City Council) and posted on the City’s website.

The City has successfully implemented affordable housing, community development, and public services activities in the previous Consolidated Plan cycle, impacting the lives of thousands of residents with low to moderate incomes. It is anticipated that the City and its partners will continue to positively impact residents through collaborative efforts. Below is a summary of some of the outcomes achieved during the first four years of the previous five-year Consolidated Plan cycle. Final outcome data for the previous Consolidated Plan cycle will be presented to HUD with the submittal of the Program Year 2024-25 CAPER.

• Rehabilitated 99 residential units through the City’s Neighborhood Pride Program • Provided fair housing services to 177 residents through the Fair Housing Program operated by the Housing Rights Center
• Served 12,106 individuals through the provision of public services

4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process

The City’s community participation process was informed by the Citizen Participation Plan, which guides the implementation of a community engagement process and notification of community meetings and public hearings. To ensure broad community involvement, the City held a community meeting and a stakeholder meeting and distributed both a Community Needs Assessment Survey and a Stakeholder Survey to gather input. To increase accessibility, the Community Needs Assessment Survey was made available in Spanish and Tagalog.

Community members were also able to provide input on the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan during a public comment period held from March 19 to April 21, 2025, and at public hearings on March 18, 2025, and May 6, 2025. Public notices for each hearing were published at least 10 days prior to the date of the hearing in the Daily Breeze newspaper, as well as posted at City Hall. All community engagement efforts are detailed further in the Process section of this plan.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 7
2025-2029

5. Summary of public comments

Feedback on community needs was collected through a community meeting and survey, a stakeholder meeting and survey, a public comment period, and at two formal public hearings.

These comments provided insight into community needs and informed the goals of the Consolidated Plan. The top priority needs identified were infrastructure improvements, economic development, services for special needs populations, and the development and preservation of affordable housing.

6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them

All public comments were accepted and included in Appendix G – Public Comments.

7. Summary

The City’s Consolidated Plan outlines the housing and community development strategies and objectives for the 2025-2029 period while fulfilling the statutory requirements necessary to receive CDBG funding. Beyond compliance, the City is dedicated to fostering robust participation from Carson residents and stakeholders throughout the Consolidated Plan process, with a particular focus on expanding opportunities for its residents with low to moderate incomes. This plan and its comprehensive community engagement efforts reflect the City’s commitment to inclusivity and equity in addressing housing and community development needs.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 8
2025-2029
The Process
PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b)

1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source

The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.

Table PR-05.01: Responsible Agencies

Agency Role Name Department/Agency
CDBG Administrator City of Carson Community Development Department, Housing Division

Narrative

The Housing Division of the City’s Community Development Department is the lead agency responsible for the preparation and administration of the Consolidated Plan, corresponding Annual Action Plans (Annual Plan), CAPERs, and the CDBG program. The implementation of programs funded by CDBG may be done in conjunction with other City departments.

Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information

Duane Cobb
Department of Community Development, Housing Division
801 East Carson Street
Carson, CA 90745
(310) 830-7600, ext. 1319
[email protected]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 9
2025-2029
PR-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(I) and

91.315(I)

1. Introduction

The City developed its 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan through consultation with local health and social service providers and adjacent local governments, homeless and social service providers active in Carson, and other stakeholders. These efforts are outlined below.

Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(I)).

To address the needs of residents with low to moderate incomes, the City of Carson collaborates with public and assisted housing providers, as well as private and governmental health, mental health, and service agencies. The Carson Housing Authority plays a central role in supporting affordable housing initiatives by partnering with developers and housing providers to leverage available resources and pursue funding opportunities. While the Carson Housing Authority does not own or manage public housing within the city, the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles (HACoLA), a division of the Los Angeles County Community Development Authority (LACDA), oversees this function and administers the Section 8 program.

The City’s Department of Community Services facilitates coordination with health and mental health service agencies. Through its allocation of up to 15 percent of annual CDBG funds for public services, the City has supported organizations such as South Bay Family Healthcare Center, Carson Child Guidance Program, and the Office of Samoan Affairs. These partnerships ensure residents have access to essential health and mental health services.

Carson is committed to fostering collaboration and leveraging resources to maximize the impact of available programs. The City engages with housing providers, regional entities, and service agencies throughout the year to endorse funding applications, identify opportunities for cooperative ventures, and avoid duplication of services. This ongoing coordination helps ensure the City can effectively meet the needs of its community.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 10
2025-2029
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness

The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) serves as the lead agency for the HUD- funded Los Angeles Continuum of Care (CoC), coordinating federal, state, county, and city funds to provide shelter, housing, and supportive services for individuals and families experiencing homelessness. The City of Carson works closely with LAHSA to align its efforts with the CoC’s strategic initiatives, leveraging resources and programs to address the needs of homeless residents, including chronically homeless individuals, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth, as well as those at risk of homelessness.

Recent developments by the City related to homelessness include:

• Continued involvement by City staff in the regular monthly meetings of the South Bay Coalition to End Homelessness;
• Ongoing participation in the Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative; • Continued participation in a joint program of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) to coordinate the following activities: outreach services; a South Bay Cities homeless hotline, screenings, and coordinated entry system assessments; case management; linkages to interim housing; housing location services; outreach to local landlords; and ongoing supportive services; and • Regular meetings of the City’s Homeless Task Force, which is coordinated by the Assistant City Manager and includes the Community Development, Community Services, and Public Safety Departments, as well as the County Sheriff’s Department (the law enforcement agency in Carson).

The City also collaborates with LAHSA on the annual Point-in-Time (PIT) Count, an essential effort by the community to engage and survey individuals experiencing homelessness to provide an accurate count of the region’s unsheltered and sheltered homeless populations.

During the 2022 PIT Count, a total of 133 people were identified as experiencing homelessness in the City of Carson, all of which were unsheltered.

Table PR-10.01 outlines the demographics of the unsheltered homeless population recorded during the 2024 PIT Count for Service Planning Area (SPA) 8, which includes the City of Carson, providing insight into the characteristics and needs of this vulnerable group.

Table PR-10.01: Point-in-Time Count Results for Service Planning Area 8

Consolidated Plan CARSON 11
2025-2029

% of
Unsheltered
Persons
# of
Unsheltered
Persons
% of
Sheltered
Persons
# of
Sheltered
Persons
Veteran 4% 178 13% 183
Female 30% 1,181 39% 562
Family Members 8% 304 29% 420
Under 18 Years Old 4% 161 19% 272
Note: Service Planning Area 8 Covers South Bay within the boundaries of the Los Angeles Continuum of Care. Long Beach is excluded from this boundary.

Data Source: 2024 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count

Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS

The City of Carson does not directly receive ESG funds. Instead, ESG funding for the region is administered by LAHSA, which serves as the lead agency for the Los Angeles CoC. LAHSA is responsible for establishing performance standards, evaluating outcomes of ESG-assisted projects, and developing funding, policies, and procedures for the administration of the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS).

City of Carson staff participates in LAHSA committee meetings, as schedules allow, to engage in discussions about standards, policies, and procedures related to ESG funds. LAHSA manages the Request for Proposals (RFP) process to allocate ESG funding to eligible programs. While no ESG- funded programs are currently based in Carson, several programs in neighboring cities, such as Torrance and Long Beach, have received funding and may provide services that benefit Carson residents through regional collaborations.

2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities

The City invited various community organizations, government entities, service providers, and stakeholders to participate in a stakeholder meeting and a community meeting regarding the Consolidated Plan. In addition to attending the meetings, stakeholders were given the opportunity to complete a survey unique to stakeholders to provide further input.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 12
2025-2029
Table PR-10.02: Agencies, Groups, and Organizations who Participated

Agency/Group/
Organization
Agency/Group/
Organization Type
What section of
the Plan was
addressed by
Consultation?
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
Los Angeles
Homeless Services
Authority
Regional Organization
– Continuum of Care
Housing Needs
Assessment,
Market Analysis
Provided localized data to inform the
Consolidated Plan
South Bay Coalition
to End
Homelessness
Regional Organization Housing Needs
Assessment,
Market Analysis
Provided localized data to inform the
Consolidated Plan
Housing Authority of
the County of Los
Angeles

Regional Organization
– PHA
Housing Needs
Assessment,
Market Analysis
Provided localized data to inform the
Consolidated Plan
Los Angeles County
Board of Supervisors
Other Government –
County
Housing Needs
Assessment
Coordination on countywide strategy
to prevent and address homelessness
Asociación Cultural
Los Angeles (ACLA)
Local non-profit
organization
Housing Needs
Assessment
Responded to stakeholder survey to
provide insight on community needs
Delta Sigma
Theta Sorority, Inc.,
Los Angeles South
Bay Alumnae
Chapter
Local non-profit
organization
Housing Needs
Assessment
Responded to stakeholder survey to
provide insight on community needs
Asian American
Drug Abuse Program
(AADAP)
Local non-profit
organization
Housing Needs
Assessment
Participated in community meeting
to provide insight on community
needs
City of Carson
Economic
Development
Commission
City Commission Housing Needs
Assessment
Participated in community meeting
to provide insight on community
needs
City of Carson
Women’s Issues
Commission
City Commission Housing Needs
Assessment
Participated in community meeting
to provide insight on community
needs

Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting

No agency or organization was purposely excluded from providing input on the Consolidated Plan.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 13
2025-2029
Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan

Table PR-10.03: Other Local/Regional/Federal Planning Efforts

Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each
plan?
Continuum of Care Los Angeles Homeless Service
Authority
This Consolidated Plan aligns with the
Los Angeles Homeless Service
Authority’s assessment of local
homeless needs and efforts.
2021-2029 Housing Element City of Carson This Consolidated Plan aligns with the goals of the City’s Housing Element, a
strategy for addressing housing needs
in Carson.

Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(l))

The City collaborates with neighboring jurisdictions and the County of Los Angeles to address housing and community development priorities. Coordination with the County is particularly important, as it administers programs like the Section 8 rental assistance voucher program for the City and neighboring jurisdictions. Additionally, the City works with local partners and stakeholders to leverage State resources to address shared priorities and maximize the impact of available funding and resources.

Narrative

Please see above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 14
2025-2029
PR-15 Citizen Participation – 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c)

1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting

During the development of the Consolidated Plan, the City implemented multiple strategies to gather community input and feedback. These efforts included a community meeting and a separate stakeholder meeting, as well as the dissemination of a Stakeholder Survey and a Community Needs Assessment Survey available both online and in print. The Community Needs Assessment Survey was offered in English, Spanish, and Tagalog. City staff conducted extensive outreach efforts ahead of the community events related to the Consolidated Plan. A total of 139 government and nonprofit agencies were notified of the opportunities to participate in the development of the Consolidated Plan. Additionally, notices about the meetings and surveys were distributed via email, posted on social media platforms, and shared on the City’s website to ensure broad community awareness and participation.

During the development of the Consolidated Plan, the City hosted two meetings to gather input from residents and stakeholders. The first meeting was a stakeholder meeting held virtually on January 15, 2025, which was attended by 3 participants. The second meeting was a community meeting that took place on January 27, 2025, at the City of Carson Community Center, which was attended by 27 participants. The presentation slides for the stakeholder and community meetings are provided in Appendices B and C, respectively. These meetings followed a two-part format: a presentation outlining the Consolidated Plan, HUD entitlement programs, and a demographic and economic overview of the City, followed by small group discussions during which attendees shared their perspectives on the community’s greatest needs. Feedback from these discussions was documented.

A Community Needs Assessment Survey was offered online and via hard copy to gather feedback on the Consolidated Plan and community priorities. The survey was available in English, Spanish and Tagalog, and completed by 30 respondents. Additionally, an online Stakeholder Survey was offered to key community stakeholders and completed by two stakeholders. The feedback collected through these surveys informed the goals outlined in this Consolidated Plan. A summary of the Community Needs Assessment Survey responses can be found in Appendix D. A summary of the Stakeholder Survey responses can be found in Appendix E.

A public notice was posted on the City’s website and at City Hall and printed in the Daily Breeze newspaper at least 14 days prior to the City Council public hearing on March 18, 2025, which was held to present the draft Consolidated Plan and open a 30-day public comment period. The Consolidated Plan CARSON 15
2025-2029
public notice provided information about the 30-day public comment period from March 19 to April 21, 2025. [INSERT NUMBER] public comments were received during the hearing on March 18, 2025. The draft Consolidated Plan and FY 2025-26 Annual Action Plan were available on the City website and in a hard copy format at City Hall during the 30-day public comment period. [INSERT NUMBER] public comments were received during the 30-day public review period. A second public notice was posted on the City’s website and at City Hall and printed in the Daily Breeze newspaper at least 14 days prior to the City Council meeting on May 6, 2025, at which the Consolidated Plan was approved. [INSERT NUMBER] public comments were received during the hearing on May 6, 2025. All public comments received during both hearings and during the public comment period are included in Appendix G of the Consolidated Plan. Copies of the public notices are included in Appendix H. The findings from these outreach activities helped shape the priority needs in the Consolidated Plan.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 16
2025-2029
Table PR-15.01: Citizen Participation Outreach

Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
responses/
attendance
Summary of
comments
received
Summary of
comments
not
accepted
and reasons
URL
(If
applicable)
Virtual
Stakeholder
Meeting –
January 15,
2025
Key
Stakeholders
3 attendees Top needs
identified by
attendees were
neighborhood
revitalization,
community
facilities, and
homeless
prevention
services.

All
comments
were
accepted.

Presentati
on slides
are
provided in
Appendix
B.

In-person
Community
Meeting –
January 27,
2025

Non-
targeted,
broad
community

27 attendees Top needs
identified by
attendees were
community
facility
improvements,
infrastructure
improvements,
and
neighborhood
revitalization.

All
comments
were
accepted.

Presentati
on slides
are
provided in
Appendix
C.

Community
Needs
Assessment
Survey

Non-
targeted,
broad
community
30 total responses Top needs
identified by
respondents
were affordable
housing
development,
economic
development,
housing services,
and
neighborhood
services.

All
comments
were
accepted.

URL
closed;
survey and
responses
are
provided in
Appendix
D

Consolidated Plan CARSON 17
2025-2029
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
responses/
attendance
Summary of
comments
received
Summary of
comments
not accepted
and reasons
URL
(If applicable)
Stakeholder
Survey
Key
Stakeholders
2 total
responses
Top needs identified
by respondents were
affordable housing
and support for
seniors and
individuals with
disabilities.

All
comments
were
accepted.

URL closed;
survey and
responses are
provided in
Appendix E
Public hearing
to present
draft
Consolidated
Plan and open
public
comment
period – March
18, 2025
Non-
targeted,
broad
community
# comments [INSERT SUMMARY] TBD N/A
City Council
public hearing
to adopt FY
25-29 Con Plan
and 24-25
Annual Plan –
May 6, 2025
Non-
targeted,
broad
community
# comments [INSERT SUMMARY] TBD N/A

Consolidated Plan CARSON 18
2025-2029
Needs Assessment
NA-05 Overview
The Needs Assessment includes the following sections:
• NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment
• NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems • NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems • NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burden • NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion
• NA-35 Public Housing
• NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment
• NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment
• NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs

Needs Assessment Overview

The Needs Assessment section describes the socioeconomic and housing landscape in the City of Carson. Carson has experienced slight population growth in recent years. As shown in Table NA-10.01, the population increased from 92,927 to 94,475 residents between 2017 and 2022, or 1.7 percent. As shown in Table NA-10.02, notable demographic shifts have occurred during this five-year period, particularly a 155 percent increase in individuals identifying as two or more races. Meanwhile, the White population decreased by 28 percent.

Economic trends reflect a widening income gap. As shown in Table NA-10.06, Carson households earning over $200,000 grew by 179 percent. However, as shown in Table NA-10.07, the number of Carson residents living below the poverty level decreased by only 12 percent.

Housing affordability remains a critical issue in Carson. As shown in Table NA-10.16, 32 percent of households are housing cost-burdened, meaning they spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing. Renters are disproportionately affected, with 48 percent of renter households experiencing cost burden.

The need for a range of services for individuals experiencing homelessness remains critical.

According to Point-in-Time Counts, the number of people facing homelessness has increased in recent years within the Los Angeles County CoC, particularly in Service Planning Area 8, which includes Carson. Additionally, the city is home to various non-homeless special needs populations that also require support.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 19
2025-2029

The primary source of data used in Needs Assessment section are HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) tabulations, which are based on the U.S Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) data and incorporate HUD-specified criteria relating to housing needs, HUD-defined income limits, and household types. This Needs Assessment predominantly uses data drawn from the most recent CHAS data set (2017-2021) and the most recent ACS data set (2018-2022). The information contained in this section informs the preparation of Carson’s housing and community development priorities and both five- and one- year investment strategies.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 20
2025-2029
NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c)

Table NA-10.01 shows the change in population and median income in Carson from 2017 to 2022. During this period, the population increased by 1.7 percent and the number of households increased 2.8 percent. The median income increased 36.5 percent in nominal terms.

Table NA-10.01: Population and Median Income
Demographi
cs
Base Year: 2017 Most Recent Year:
2022
% Change
Population 92,927 94,475 1.7%
Households 25,381 26,084 2.8%
Median
Income $75,517 $103,045 36.5%
Data
Source:
2013-2017 ACS (Base Year), 2018-2022 ACS (Most Recent Year) [Tables DP05 & S1901]

Table NA-10.02 compares Carson’s population distribution by race and ethnicity in 2017 and 2022. In 2022, Asian residents made up the largest racial group (26 percent), followed by Black residents (23 percent) and White residents (20 percent). Regarding ethnicity, Hispanic households accounted for 40 percent of the population, while non-Hispanic residents comprised 60 percent.

Table NA-10.02: Population by Race and Ethnicity
Race 2017 Five-Year ACS 2022 Five-Year ACS
Population % of Total Population % of Total
White 26,776 28.8% 19,310 20.4%
Black or African American 21,553 23.2% 21,222 22.5%
American Indian & Alaska Native 700 0.8% 549 0.6%
Asian 24,877 26.8% 24,137 25.5%
Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander 1,918 2.1% 1,790 1.9% Other 12,120 13.0% 14,781 15.6%
Two or More Races 4,983 5.4% 12,686 13.4%
Total 92,927 100.0% 94,475 100.0%
Non-Hispanic 57,707 62.1% 56,433 59.7%
Hispanic 35,220 37.9% 38,042 40.3%
Data Source: 2014-2018 and 2018-2022 ACS [Table DP05]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 21
2025-2029
As shown in Table NA-10.03, the group quarters population grew by 149 percent, rising from 1,303 in 2010 to 3,248 in 2020. The institutionalized population increased by 95 percent during this period, primarily due to growth in nursing facilities. The non-institutionalized population increased by 155 percent.

Table NA-10.03: Group Quarters Population
Group Quarters Type 2010 Census 2020 Census % Change
Population % of Total Population % of Total 2010-2020
Institutionalized
Correctional Institutions 13 10% 4 2% -69%
Juvenile Facilities 67 50% 40 15% -40%
Nursing Facilities 49 37% 216 83% 341%
Other Institutions 4 3% 0 0% --
Subtotal 133 100% 260 100% 95%
Non-Institutionalized
College Dormitories 571 49% 656 22% 15%
Military Quarters 0 0% 0 0% --
Other 599 51% 2,332 78% 289%
Subtotal 1,170 100% 2,988 100% 155%
Total Group Quarters
Population 1,303 100% 3,248 100% 149%
Data Source: 2014-2018 and 2018-2022 ACS [Table P18]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 22
2025-2029
As shown in Table NA-10.04, the total number of households in Carson increased from 25,381 in 2017 to 26,084 in 2022. Family households remained the majority in 2022, accounting for 81 percent of all households, with married -couple families comprising 53 percent. Non- family households declined slightly to 1 9 percent. Owner-occupied households remained the majority at 75 percent, while renter-occupied households made up 25 percent.

Table NA-10.04: Household Type by Tenure
Household Type 2017 Five-Year ACS 2022 Five-Year ACS
Population % of Total Population % of Total
Family Households 20,342 80.1% 21,233 81.4%
Married Couple Family 13,439 52.9% 13,912 53.3%
Owner-Occupied 10,556 41.6% 11,503 44.1%
Renter-Occupied 2,883 11.4% 2,409 9.2%
Other Family 6,903 27.2% 7,321 28.1%
Male Household, No
Spouse Present 1,820 7.2% 2,634 10.1%
Owner-Occupied 1,191 4.7% 1,951 7.5%
Renter-Occupied 629 2.5% 683 2.6%
Female Household, No
Spouse Present 5,083 20.0% 4,687 18.0%
Owner-Occupied 3,422 13.5% 3,100 11.9%
Renter-Occupied 1,661 6.5% 1,587 6.1%
Non-Family Households 5,039 19.9% 4,851 18.6%
Owner-Occupied 3,747 14.8% 2,942 11.3%
Renter-Occupied 1,292 5.1% 1,909 7.3%
Total 25,381 100.0%

26,084 100.0%
Data Source: 2013-2017 and 2018-2022 ACS [Table B25115]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 23
2025-2029
Table NA-10.05 shows household income distribution in Carson by family size, based on HUD Adjusted Median Family Income (HAMFI), which is HUD’s term for what is broadly referred to as Area Median Income (AMI). As shown, 14 percent of households earned incomes below 30 percent of HAMFI, while 44 percent earned incomes above 100 percent of HAMFI.

Table NA-10.05: Household Income by Family Size
0-30%
HAMFI
>30-50%
HAMFI
>50-80%
HAMFI
>80-
100%
HAMFI
>100%
HAMFI
Total Households 3,740 2,795 5,050 3,085 11,430
Small Family Households 950 1,240 2,335 1,480 5,970
Large Family Households 425 630 955 735 2,660
Household contains at least one
person 62-74 years of age 1,205 670 1,650 1,025 3,970
Household contains at least one
person age 75 or older 970 550 1,010 405 1,365
Households with one or more children
6 years old or younger 410 575 699 655 1,370
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Tables 5, 7 & 13]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 24
2025-2029
Table NA-10.6 compares households by income in Carson in 2017 and 2022. Households earning more than $100,000 per year represented 35 percent of households in 2017, compared to 52 percent in 2022. Meanwhile, households earning less than $15,000 accounted for 7 percent of households in 2017, compared to 6 percent in 2022.

Table NA-10.06: Households by Income
Income
2017 Five-Year ACS 2022 Five-Year ACS
Households % of Total Households % of Total
Less than $15,000 1,802 7.1% 1,617 6.2%
$15,000 to $24,999 1,954 7.7% 1,148 4.4%
$25,000 to $34,999 1,421 5.6% 1,382 5.3%
$35,000 to $49,999 2,919 11.5% 1,643 6.3%
$50,000 to $74,999 4,492 17.7% 3,469 13.3%
$75,000 to $99,999 3,858 15.2% 3,313 12.7%
$100,000 to $149,999 5,406 21.3% 6,025 23.1%
$150,000 to $199,999 2,030 8.0% 3,287 12.6%
$200,000 or more 1,497 5.9% 4,173 16.0%
Total 25,381 100.0% 26,084 100.0%
Data Source: 2013-2017 & 2018-2022 ACS [Table S1901]

Table NA-10.07 shows the change in the number of Carson residents living below the poverty level by age from 2017 to 2022. In 2017, the poverty rate was 10.6 percent, which decreased to

9.2 percent by 2022.

Table NA-10.07: Poverty by Age
Age
2017 Five-Year ACS 2022 Five-Year ACS
Persons in Poverty
% of
Total Persons in Poverty
% of
Total
Under 5 885 9.1% 364 4.2%
5 to 17 2,215 22.7% 1,576 18.3%
18 to 64 5,409 55.4% 4,871 56.6%
65 or Older 1,250 12.8% 1,793 20.8%
Total 9,759 100.0% 8,604 100.0%
Poverty
Rate 10.6% 9.2%
Data Source: 2013-2017 & 2018-2022 ACS [Table S1701]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 25
2025-2029
Housing Needs Summary Tables

Households are considered to have housing problems if they have one or more of the following conditions:

1. Substandard Housing Unit – Lacks Complete Kitchen Facilities. A complete kitchen consists of a sink with running water, a stove or range, and a refrigerator.

2. S ubstandard Housing Unit – Lacks Complete Plumbing Facilities: Complete plumbing consists of hot and cold running water, a flush toilet, and a bathtub or shower.

3. C ost Burdened Household: Monthly housing costs exceed 30 percent of monthly income. A household is severely cost burdened if their monthly housing costs exceed 50 percent of their monthly income. Note that, for renters, housing costs include contract rent and utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payments, utilities, association fees, insurance, and real estate taxes.

4. O
vercrowded Household: More than one person per room. Severe overcrowding is more than 1.5 persons per room.

Tables NA-10.08 and NA-10.09 highlight housing problems in Carson, categorizing households by income level and tenure (renter-occupied vs. owner-occupied).

Consolidated Plan CARSON 26
2025-2029
Table NA-10.08: Housing Problems by Tenure & Income
Renter
0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80-100% Total
Substandard Housing - Lacking
complete plumbing or kitchen facilities
75 15 15 0 105
Severely Overcrowded - With >1.51
people per room (and complete
kitchen and plumbing)
120 115 40 40 315
Overcrowded - With 1.01-1.5 people
per room (and none of the above

85 205 245 10 545
Housing cost burden greater than 50%
of income (and none of the above

980 170 140 20 1,310
Housing cost burden greater than 30%
of income (and none of the above

260 345 355 180 1,140
Zero/negative Income (and none of the
above problems)
90 0 0 0 90
Owner
0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80-100% Total
Substandard Housing - Lacking
complete plumbing or kitchen facilities
15 10 60 0 85
Severely Overcrowded - With >1.51
people per room (and complete
kitchen and plumbing)
30 30 55 0 115
Overcrowded - With 1.01-1.5 people
per room (and none of the above

35 180 185 90 490
Housing cost burden greater than 50%
of income (and none of the above

1,035 390 430 110 1,965
Housing cost burden greater than 30%
of income (and none of the above

345 210 885 565 2,005
Zero/negative Income (and none of the
above problems)
90 0 0 0 90

Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 3]
Consolidated Plan CARSON 27
2025-2029
Table NA-10.09: Severe Housing Problems by Tenure & Income Renter
0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80-100% Total
Having 1 or more of four housing
problems
1,260 505 440 70 2,275
Having none of four housing
problems
455 630 1,225 620 2,930
Household has negative income,
but none of the other housing

0 0 0 0 0
Owner
0-30% >30-50% >50-80% >80-100% Total
Having 1 or more of four housing
problems
1,115 610 725 195 2,645
Having none of four housing
problems
910 1,050 2,655 2,195 6,810
Household has negative income,
but none of the other housing

0 0 0 0 0

Tables NA-10.10 and NA-10.11 show the number of renter and owner households in Carson experiencing a cost burden greater than 30 percent and 50 percent, categorized by household type, income level, and tenure.

Table NA-10.10: Cost Burden > 30%
Household Type
Renter
0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total
Small Related 120 345 195 660
Large Related 80 210 95 385
Elderly 125 30 100 255
Other 15 35 15 65
Total need by income 340 620 405 1,365
Household Type
Owner
0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total
Small Related 135 50 505 690
Large Related 4 30 195 229
Elderly 235 150 250 635
Other 10 0 15 25
Total need by income 384 230 965 1,579

Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 2]
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 7]
Consolidated Plan CARSON 28
2025-2029
Table NA-10.11: Cost Burden > 30%
Household Type Renter
0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total
Small Related 285 115 85 485
Large Related 215 10 4 229
Elderly 365 10 45 420
Other 310 30 0 340
Total need by income 1,175 165 134 1,474
Household Type Owner
0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI Total
Small Related 320 230 215 765
Large Related 75 90 35 200
Elderly 595 70 125 790
Other 65 25 55 145
Total need by income 1,055 415 430 1,900

Tables NA-10.12 and NA-10.13 show the numbers of renter and owner households in Carson experiencing overcrowding and severe overcrowding. Again, overcrowding is defined as 1.1 to

1.5 people per room, while severe overcrowding is defined as more than 1.5 people per room.

Table NA-10.12: Crowding (More than one person per room) Household Type

Renter
0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI >80-100%
AMI Total
Single family 205 300 175 45 725
Multiple, unrelated 0 25 129 4 158
Other, non-family 0 0 0 0 0
Total need by income 205 325 304 49 883
Owner
0-30% AMI >30-50% AMI >50-80% AMI >80-100%

Total
Single family 35 45 170 45 295
Multiple, unrelated 20 165 100 40 325
Other, non-family 10 0 0 0 10
Total need by income 65 210 270 85 630

Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 7]
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 10]
Consolidated Plan CARSON 29
2025-2029
Table NA-10.13: Overcrowding and Severe Overcrowding
Data Source No Overcrowding Overcrowding Severe Overcrowding Households % of Total Households % of Total Households % of Total Owner
2017 Five-Year CHAS 17,560 92.8% 1,035 5.5% 320 1.7%
2021 Five-Year CHAS 18,020 93.2% 1,100 5.7% 215 1.1%
Renter
2017 Five-Year CHAS 5,175 80.0% 785 12.1% 505 7.8%
2021 Five-Year CHAS 5,720 84.6% 720 10.7% 320 4.7%
Total
2017 Five-Year CHAS 22,735 89.6% 1,820 7.2% 825 3.3%
2021 Five-Year CHAS 23,740 91.0% 1,820 7.0% 535 2.1%
Data Source: 2013-2017 and 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 10]

Tables NA-10.14 and NA-10.15 show the changes in the number of households with complete and incomplete plumbing and kitchen facilities from 2017 to 2022. As mentioned above, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, a housing unit is classified as lacking complete plumbing facilities when any of the following are not present: piped hot and cold water, a flush toilet, and a bathtub or shower. Likewise, a unit is categorized as lacking complete kitchen facilities when any of the following are not present: a sink with piped hot and cold water, a range/cooktop and oven, and a refrigerator.

Table NA-10.14: Households with Incomplete Plumbing Facilities Households 2017 Five-Year ACS 2022 Five-Year ACS
With Complete Plumbing Facilities 25,327 25,935
Lacking Complete Plumbing Facilities 54 149
Total Households 25,381 26,084
Percent Lacking 0.21% 0.57%
Data Source: 2013-2017 and 2018-2022 ACS [Table B25049]

Table NA-10.15: Households with Incomplete Kitchen Facilities Households 2017 Five-Year ACS 2022 Five-Year ACS
With Complete Kitchen Facilities 25,313 25,846
Lacking Complete Kitchen Facilities 68 238
Total Households 25,381 26,084
Percent Lacking 0.27% 0.91%
Data Source: 2013-2017 and 2018-2022 ACS [Table B25053]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 30
2025-2029
Tables NA-10.16 and NA-10.17 compare the number of households in Carson experiencing cost burden in 2017 and 2021. Again, a household is considered cost-burdened if they pay 30 to 50 percent of gross household income on housing costs. A household is considered severely cost- burdened if they pay more than 50 percent of gross household income on housing costs. For homeowners, gross housing costs include mortgage payments, property taxes, insurance, energy payments, water and sewer service, and refuse collection. For renters, gross housing costs include monthly rent and selected electricity and natural gas energy charges.

Table NA-10.16: Cost Burden and Severe Cost Burden by Tenure Data
Source
Less than 30% 31%-50% Above 50% Not Completed
Total
House-
holds
% of
Total
House-
holds
% of
Total
House-
holds
% of
Total
House-
holds
% of
Total
Owner
2017 Five-
Year CHAS 13,365 70.7% 3,175 16.8% 2,275 12.0% 95 0.5% 18,910 2021 Five-
Year CHAS 14,230 73.6% 2,970 15.4% 2,045 10.6% 90 0.5% 19,335 Renter
2017 Five-
Year CHAS 3,115 48.2% 1,670 25.8% 1,590 24.6% 90 1.4% 6,465 2021 Five-
Year CHAS 3,445 51.0% 1,715 25.4% 1,510 22.3% 90 1.3% 6,760 Total
2017 Five-
Year CHAS 16,480 64.9% 4,845 19.1% 3,865 15.2% 185 0.7% 25,375 2021 Five-
Year CHAS 17,675 67.7% 4,685 18.0% 3,555 13.6% 180 0.7% 26,095

Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance.

According to 2022 five-year ACS estimates, 16 percent of occupied housing units in Carson are occupied by a one-person household (4,095 households). Of these single-person households, 52 Data Source: 2013-2017 and 2017-2021 CHAS [Summary Level Data] Consolidated Plan CARSON 31
2025-2029
percent are aged 65 years or older (2,134 households). Senior single-person households often require housing assistance, as they typically rely on fixed incomes that may not keep pace with rising living costs.

Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking.

According to 2022 five-year ACS estimates, the median income for those living with a disability in Carson is $34,968, which is 79 percent of the median income of those living without a disability ($44,022).

There is no information available specifically on victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking in Carson. However, according to the U.S. Department of Justice 2020 Biennial Violence Against Women Report to Congress, approximately 44 percent of women and 25 percent of men nationwide experience some form of contact sexual violence in their lifetime. Due to the large number of domestic and sexual violence victims nationwide, it is anticipated that there is a need for housing assistance for domestic and sexual violence victims in Carson. Low-income individuals are particularly susceptible to domestic or sexual violence as they have limited access to resources, such as safe and secure housing and legal representation. Also at higher risk are chronically underserved populations, including rural victims and victims with disabilities.

What are the most common housing problems?

As shown in Table NA-10.08, the most common housing problem continues to be housing cost burden. Table NA-10.16 shows that 1,715 renter households are cost-burdened (spending 30 to 50 percent of income on housing), while 1,510 households are severely cost-burdened (spending more than 50 percent of income on housing). For owner-occupied households, 2,970 households are cost-burdened, and 2,045 households are severely cost-burdened.

Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems?

Overall, housing cost burden disproportionately affects renters, with 48 percent of renter households experiencing cost burden (3,225 of 6,760 households as shown in Table NA-10.16).

Comparatively, 26 percent of owner households experience cost burden (5,015 of 19,335 households as shown in Table NA-10.16). As shown in Table NA-10.10, 46 percent of cost- burdened households are small family households and 30 percent are elderly households. As Consolidated Plan CARSON 32
2025-2029
shown in Table NA-10.11, 37 percent of severely cost-burdened households are small family households and 36 percent are elderly households.

Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance.

Households most likely to be at risk of becoming unsheltered are those with extremely low incomes that are severely cost-burdened. As shown in Table NA-10.11, 1,175 renter households and 1,055 owner households in Carson earn below 30 percent of AMI and are severely cost- burdened. Households with extremely low incomes make up 66 percent of low-income households that are severely cost-burdened.

If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at-risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at-risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates:

Not applicable.

Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness

According to the National Alliance to End Homelessness, various factors contribute to an increased risk of homelessness, particularly housing-related challenges that create instability for vulnerable households. One of the most significant risk factors is low income, which is closely linked to housing insecurity. Many low-income households face unemployment or underemployment due to barriers such as a challenging labor market, limited education, gaps in work history, criminal records, unreliable transportation, unstable housing, poor health, and disabilities.

For those who are employed but still low-income, stagnant wages and rising housing costs create an affordability gap, making it difficult to maintain stable housing. As housing costs continue to increase, wages have not kept pace, leaving many individuals and families struggling to afford rent. The combination of low income and a shrinking supply of affordable housing places many households at heightened risk of homelessness.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 33
2025-2029
As discussed in this and the following sections, many households in the community face significant cost burdens and other housing challenges, further contributing to instability and increasing their risk of homelessness.

Discussion

Please see above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 34
2025-2029
NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole.

Introduction

HUD defines a disproportionate need as any need for a race/ethnicity that is more than 10 percent above the need for the total households at a particular income level. For example, if 40 percent of all very low-income households in a jurisdiction experience one or more of the four defined housing problems, but 50 percent of one specific ethnic group’s very low-income households experience housing problems, that would be considered a disproportionate need.

Again, the four housing problems are:

1. Unit lacks complete kitchen facilities;

2. Unit lacks complete plumbing facilities;

3. Household spends more than 30 percent of income on housing costs; and

4. Household includes more than one person per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, and half-rooms.

The following tables and analyses outline the share of households by race/ethnicity and income level experiencing a housing problem.

Table NA-15.01: Disproportionally Greater Need 0%-30% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Percent
with one
or more
housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 2,980 760 0 80%
White 315 155 0 67%
Black / African American 840 95 0 90%
Asian 565 160 0 78%
American Indian, Alaska
Native 0 0 0 -
Pacific Islander 50 0 0 100%
Hispanic 1,205 290 0 81%
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 1]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 35
2025-2029
Table NA-15.02: Disproportionally Greater Need 30%-50% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Percent
with one
or more
housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,670 1,130 0 60%
White 70 150 0 32%
Black / African American 400 210 0 66%
Asian 305 245 0 55%
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 10 0 0%
Pacific Islander 35 0 0 100%
Hispanic 830 500 0 62%
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 1]

Table NA-15.03: Disproportionally Greater Need 50%-80% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Percent
with one or
more
housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 2,405 2,650 0 48%
White 190 340 0 36%
Black / African American 645 720 0 47%
Asian 520 570 0 48%
American Indian, Alaska
Native 0 15 0 0%
Pacific Islander 15 0 0 100%
Hispanic 870 915 0 49%
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 1]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 36
2025-2029
Table NA-15.04: Disproportionally Greater Need 80%-100% of Area Median Income Housing Problems Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Percent
with one or
more
housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,015 2,070 0 33%
White 105 235 0 31%
Black / African American 285 385 0 43%
Asian 320 470 0 41%
American Indian, Alaska
Native 0 4 0 0%
Pacific Islander 0 65 0 0%
Hispanic 260 855 0 23%
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 1]

Discussion
Discussed in NA-30.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 37
2025-2029
NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems – 91.205 (b)(2)
Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole.

Introduction

While Section NA-15 measured disproportionate housing problems, this section measures disproportionate severe housing problems, which are defined as follows:

1. Unit lacks complete kitchen facilities;

2. Unit lacks complete plumbing facilities;

3. Household spends more than 50 percent of income on housing costs; and

4. Household includes more than 1.5 person per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, and half-rooms.

Again, HUD defines a disproportionate need as any need for a race/ethnicity that is more than 10 percent above the need for the total households at a particular income level. The following tables and analyses outline the share of households by race/ethnicity and income level experiencing a severe housing problem.

Table NA-20.01: Severe Housing Problems 0%-30% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problems Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Percent with
one or more
housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 2,375 1,365 0 64%
White 190 290 0 40%
Black / African American 775 160 0 83%
Asian 455 270 0 63%
American Indian, Alaska
Native 0 0 0 -
Pacific Islander 50 0 0 100%
Hispanic 900 600 0 60%

Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 2]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 38
2025-2029
Table NA-20.02: Severe Housing Problems 30%-50% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problems Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Percent
with one or
more
housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,115 1,680 0 40%
White 40 180 0 18%
Black / African American 315 295 0 52%
Asian 215 335 0 39%
American Indian, Alaska
Native 0 10 0 0%
Pacific Islander 15 20 0 43%
Hispanic 500 825 0 38%
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 2]

Table NA-20.03: Severe Housing Problems 50%-80% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problems Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Percent
with one or
more
housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,165 3,880 0 23%
White 120 410 0 23%
Black / African American 360 1,005 0 26%
Asian 205 885 0 19%
American Indian, Alaska
Native 0 15 0 0%
Pacific Islander 15 0 0 100%
Hispanic 455 1,330 0 25%
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 2]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 39
2025-2029
Table NA-20.04: Severe Housing Problems 80%-100% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problems Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Percent
with one or
more
housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 265 2,815 0 9%
White 0 345 0 0%
Black / African American 40 630 0 6%
Asian 135 660 0 17%
American Indian, Alaska
Native 0 4 0 0%
Pacific Islander 0 65 0 0%
Hispanic 90 1,030 0 8%
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 2]

Discussion

Discussed in NA-30.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 40
2025-2029
NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens – 91.205 (b)(2) Assess the need of any racial or ethnic group that has disproportionately greater need in comparison to the needs of that category of need as a whole.

Introduction:

Disproportionate greater need relative to housing cost burden is calculated by dividing the number of households in a cost burden category (i.e., not cost burdened, spending more than 30 percent on housing, or spending more than 50 percent on housing) by the total number of households for that given racial or ethnic group or the jurisdiction for a whole. For example, 68 percent of the jurisdiction spends 30 percent or less of their income on housing costs. This is calculated by dividing 17,679, or the number of households in this category, by the total households, or 26,108. The total households are calculated by summing the numbers in the top data row shown below.

The following section analyzes whether any racial or ethnic groups in Carson experience a disproportionately greater cost burden compared to the overall population. Again, housing cost burden is defined as households spending more than 30 to 50 percent of their income on housing, while severe cost burden applies to those spending more than 50 percent.

Table NA-25.01: Housing Cost Burden
Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50% No / negative
income (not
computed)
Jurisdiction as a whole 17,679
68%
4,690
18%
3,560
14%
179
1%
White 1,730
72%
400
17%
240
10%
34 1%
Black / African
American
4,880
67%
1,025
14%
1,360
19%
30 0%
Asian 4,910
71%
1,225
18%
765
11%
60 1%
American Indian,
Alaska Native
34 100%
0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
Pacific Islander 215
67%
55 17%
50 16%
0 0%
Hispanic 5,290
64%
1,790
22%
1,115
14%
15 0%
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 9]
Consolidated Plan CARSON 41
2025-2029
Discussion

Discussed in NA-30.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 42
2025-2029
NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion – 91.205(b)(2)

Are there any Income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole?

The data presented in Section NA-15 through NA-25 above show that there are racial or ethnic groups that experience disproportionately greater need in terms of housing problems. HUD defines a disproportionate need as any need for a certain race/ethnicity that is more than 10 percent above the need for the total households at a particular income level. As shown in the tables in the preceding sections, the following racial or ethnic groups have disproportionately greater need:

Housing Problems:
• 0-30 percent AMI: Black/African American; Pacific Islander • 30-50 percent AMI: Pacific Islander
• 50-80 percent AMI: Pacific Islander
• 80-100 percent AMI: Black/African American

Severe Housing Problems:
• 0-30 percent AMI: Black/African American; Pacific Islander • 30-50 percent AMI: Black/African American
• 50-80 percent AMI: Pacific Islander
• 80-100 percent AMI: None

There were no identified racial or ethnic groups that had a disproportionately greater need than the jurisdiction relative to housing cost burden.

Pacific Islander and Black/African American households are the most common groups to experience disproportionately greater needs. Note that, in absolute numbers, Pacific Islander households in Carson constitute a relatively small population of 320 households, of which 100 earn up to 80 percent of the AMI. White, Hispanic, Asian, and American Indian/Alaska Native households do not have disproportionately greater need in any category at any income level.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 43
2025-2029
Table NA-30.01 summarizes the total households in Carson with housing problems by income and race.

Table NA-30.01: Total Households with Housing Problems by Income and Race Income
Non-Hispanic by Race
Hispanic
(Any
Race) Total White Black Asian
American
Indian
Pacific
Islander
With Housing Problems
0-30% AMI 315 840 565 0 50 1,205 2,975
>30-50% AMI 70 400 305 0 35 830 1,640
>50-80% AMI 190 645 520 0 15 870 2,240
>80-100%
AMI 105 285 320 0 0 260 970
>100% AMI 95 380 900 0 45 315 1,735
Total 775 2,550 2,610 0 145 3,480 9,560
Total Households
0-30% AMI 470 935 725 0 50 1,495 3,675
>30-50% AMI 220 610 550 10 35 1,330 2,755
>50-80% AMI 530 1,365 1,090 15 15 1,785 4,800
>80-100%
AMI 340 670 790 4 65 1,115 2,984
>100% AMI 840 3,715 3,785 0 155 2,480 10,975
Total 2,400 7,295 6,940 29 320 8,205 25,189
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 1]

If they have needs not identified above, what are those needs?

Not applicable.

Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community?

Not applicable.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 44
2025-2029
NA-35 Public Housing – 91.205(b)

Introduction

The Carson Housing Authority does not own or operate any public housing within the city limits. In Carson, the role of a “public housing authority” (PHA), as the term is commonly understood, is carried out by the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles (HACoLA), a division of the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA). HACoLA oversees public housing units across Los Angeles County, although none of these properties are located in Carson. In addition to managing public housing, HACoLA administers rental assistance programs, including Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, which provide financial support to eligible low-income households.

The following tables present data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Public and Indian Housing (PIH) Information Center (PIC), offering further insights into public housing programs and rental assistance administered countywide by HACoLA (not only within Carson).

Table NA-35.01: Public Housing by Program Type
Program Type
Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project -
based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
# of units vouchers in use 0 253 2,883 21,087 47 20,550 268 163 59 *includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)

Consolidated Plan CARSON 45
2025-2029
Table NA-35.02: Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Program Type
Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project -
based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Average Annual Income 0 14,341 13,522 14,839 15,746 14,816 14,829 17,842 Average length of stay 0 6 8 8 0 8 0 6
Average Household size 0 3 2 2 2 2 1 4
# Homeless at admission 0 0 0 184 0 42 142 0
# of Elderly Program Participants (>62) 0 48 1,138 6,753 15 6,670 38 2 # of Disabled Families 0 40 534 4,416 17 4,269 83 16
# of Families requesting accessibility
features 0 253 2,883 21,087 47 20,550 268 163
# of HIV/AIDS program participants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
# of DV victims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)

Consolidated Plan CARSON 46
2025-2029
Table NA-35.03: Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Program Type
Race Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project -
based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
White 0 148 1,710 10,344 33 10,071 80 120 40
Black/African American 0 60 1,035 8,432 12 8,188 179 38 15 Asian 0 8 120 2,181 1 2,173 3 1 3
American Indian/Alaska
Native 0 0 11 76 1 67 6 2 0
Pacific Islander 0 37 7 54 0 51 0 2 1
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)

Consolidated Plan CARSON 47
2025-2029
Table NA-35.04: Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Program Type
Ethnicity Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project -
based
Tenant -
based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
Hispanic 0 124 1,121 7,293 11 7,122 40 105 15
Not Hispanic 0 129 1,762 13,794 36 13,428 228 58 44
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
Consolidated Plan CARSON 48
2025-2029
Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units:

As noted above, the City does not own or operate any public housing units. The public housing authority operating in Carson is the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles (HACoLA), a division of the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA). HACoLA manages public housing properties located throughout Los Angeles County, although none of these units are located in Carson. HACoLA's activity in Carson is limited to the Section 8 program.

Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice voucher holders

The most immediate needs of public housing and Housing Choice Voucher holders center around securing and maintaining affordable housing. Many voucher holders are extremely low- income households that are particularly vulnerable to housing instability due to factors such as rising rents, fixed or limited incomes, and a lack of available units that accept vouchers.

For many households, even a small increase in rent or unexpected financial hardship could lead to displacement. Challenges such as long wait times for housing assistance, difficulty finding landlords willing to participate in the voucher program, and inadequate supportive services further heighten this risk. Many households may also require supportive services, including case management, rental assistance, or emergency financial aid to ensure long-term housing stability.

How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at large

The housing needs of public housing and Housing Choice Voucher holders are significantly more urgent and prevalent compared to the general population. Households utilizing publicly supported housing typically have lower incomes, which increases their risk of housing instability, cost burden, and risk of experiencing homelessness.

Additionally, the rate of disabilities among public housing residents is higher than in the general population, creating a greater need for accessible units and supportive services. These factors, combined with limited housing availability and challenges related to landlord participation, make securing and maintaining stable housing particularly challenging for these households compared to the broader community.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 49
2025-2029
Discussion

Please see above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 50
2025-2029
NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205(c)

Introduction

The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) serves as the lead agency for the HUD- funded Los Angeles Continuum of Care (CoC), a regional network of service providers dedicated to addressing homelessness. As part of its efforts, LAHSA conducts the annual Point-in-Time (PIT) Count, which provides a snapshot of the homeless population on a given night. The Annual PIT data consists of information collected on the sheltered and unsheltered homeless population. It is a physical count of all homeless persons who are living in emergency shelter, transitional housing, safe havens, and on the street in a single night. Data describing the characteristics of sheltered homeless persons are obtained from the region’s Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) where possible and collected directly from providers not using HMIS as needed.

Unsheltered homeless are counted by direct observation, and volunteers canvas the regions by car and on foot during the chosen night. A large subset of the unsheltered population is also interviewed, providing data that is then used to estimate demographic details of the unsheltered population at a single point-in-time.

In the 2024 PIT Count for Service Planning Area 8 (SPA 8)—which covers the South Bay region within the Los Angeles CoC (excluding Long Beach)— 1,436 sheltered individuals and 3,992 unsheltered individuals were counted, totaling 5,428 individuals experiencing homelessness.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 51
2025-2029
Table NA-40.01 presents data from the 2024 Point-in-Time (PIT) Count for Service Planning Area 8 (SPA 8), which includes Carson. Note that individuals may be counted towards multiple or none of the categories, so the sum of the numbers shown does not total to the 5,428 individuals experiencing homelessness that were counted.

Table NA-40.01: Homeless Needs Assessment – Service Planning Area 8 Population Estimate the # of
persons experiencing
homelessness on a
given night
Sheltered Unsheltered
Persons in
Households with
Adult(s) and
Child(ren)
420 304
Chronically Homeless
Individuals 243 1,956
Chronically Homeless
Families 34 81
Veterans 183 178
Unaccompanied
Child 3 2
Persons with HIV 19 8
Note: Service Planning Area 8 covers South Bay within the boundaries of the Los Angeles Continuum of Care. Long Beach is excluded from this boundary.

Data Source: 2024 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 52
2025-2029
If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," and "number of days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth):

Table NA-40.02: Race/Ethnicity of Sheltered and Unsheltered – Service Planning Area 8 Race/Ethnicity Sheltered Unsheltered Total Prevalence in Homeless
Population (%)
White 603 952 1,555 29%
Black or African
American 628 1,276 1,904 35%
Asian 17 133 150 3%
American Indian,
Alaska Native, or
Indigenous
38 71 109 2%
Pacific Islander 16 5 21 0%
Middle Eastern or
North African 1 8 9 0%
Hispanic 476 1,791 2,267 42%
Note: Service Planning Area 8 covers South Bay within the boundaries of Los Angeles Continuum of Care. Long Beach is excluded from this boundary. Note that persons with multiple racial/ethnic identities are represented in multiple categories.

Data Source: 2024 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count

Table NA-40.03: Household Type of Sheltered and Unsheltered – Service Planning Area 8

% of
Unsheltered
Persons
# of
Unsheltered
Persons
% of
Sheltered
Persons
# of
Sheltered
Persons
Veteran 4% 178 13% 183
Female 30% 1,181 39% 562
Family Members 8% 304 29% 420
Under 18 Years Old 4% 161 19% 272
Note: Service Planning Area 8 covers South Bay within the boundaries of Los Angeles Continuum of Care. Long Beach is excluded from this boundary.

Data Source: 2024 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count

Consolidated Plan CARSON 53
2025-2029
In addition, the South Bay Coalition to End Homelessness provided the following Carson-specific data on homelessness. Note that the most current information available is for 2022.

Table NA-40.04: City of Carson Homeless Count Results

Data Source: South Bay Coalition to End Homelessness, Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, 2022

Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for families with children and the families of veterans.

Table NA-40.03 shows that families account for 8 percent of the unsheltered population and 29 percent of the sheltered population, according to 2024 Point-in-Time Count data. Additionally, veterans make up 4 percent of the unsheltered population and 13 percent of the sheltered population.

Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group.

Table NA-40.03 shows that 42 percent of individuals experiencing homelessness in Service Planning Area 8 are Hispanic, 35 percent are Black or African American, and 29 percent are

Consolidated Plan CARSON 54
2025-2029
White. Note that persons with multiple racial/ethnic identities are represented in multiple categories.

Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness.

Based on the 2024 PIT Count, in Service Planning Area 8, 1,436 individuals were sheltered (26 percent), and 3,992 individuals were unsheltered (74 percent), totaling 5,428 individuals experiencing homelessness.

Discussion

Please see above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 55
2025-2029
NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b,d)

Introduction:

The non-homeless special needs group is described as persons who are not homeless but who require housing or supportive services because of special characteristics. This group includes elderly (aged 62 and older); frail elderly; persons with mental, physical or developmental disabilities; persons with HIV/AIDS and their families; persons with alcohol or other drug addictions; and victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking.

Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community:

Elderly and Frail Elderly

Seniors (those 65 years of age and older) are considered a special needs group due to their relatively low income and relatively high presence of disabilities or limitations and dependency needs. According to 2022 five-year ACS estimates, 17 percent of Carson’s population is aged 65 years or older (16,245 individuals). Furthermore, 2,134 Carson households (8 percent of all households) consist of a person aged 65 or older living alone. Senior households are particularly vulnerable to housing problems due to limited income, prevalence of mental and physical disabilities, limited mobility and high health care costs. As shown in Table NA-10.11, 36 percent of low-income households experiencing severe housing cost burden are elderly (1,210 households).

Consolidated Plan CARSON 56
2025-2029
Persons with Disabilities

Table NA-45.01 presents disability rates by age, based on 2022 five-year ACS estimates. As shown, the disability rate was 13 percent citywide. As expected, the disability rate increases with age, reaching 52 percent among individuals aged 75 and older.

Table NA-45.01: Disability by Age
Age
Male Female Total
Disabled Disability Disabled Disability Disabled Disability Population Rate Population Rate Population Rate
Under 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
5 to 17 483 6.8% 110 1.6% 593 4.2%
18 to 34 949 8.1% 459 4.5% 1,408 6.4%
35 to 64 2,410 13.0% 1,859 9.7% 4,269 11.3%
65 to 74 1,129 27.4% 1,230 22.9% 2,359 24.9%
75 or Older 1,381 49.0% 2,113 54.7% 3,494 52.3%
Total 6,352 13.6% 5,771 12.2% 12,123 12.9%
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table B18101]

Table NA-45.02 presents the number of Carson residents with disabilities by type based on the 2022 five-year ACS estimates. Among individuals aged five years old and older, 8 percent have an independent living disability, 8 percent have an ambulatory disability, and 6 percent have a cognitive disability.

Table NA-45.02: Total Disabilities Tallied: Aged 5 and Older Disability Type Population
with
Disability
Percent
with
Disability
Hearing difficulty 2,442 2.6%
Vision difficulty 1,586 1.7%
Cognitive difficulty 5,388 6.0%
Ambulatory difficulty 6,796 7.6%
Self-care difficulty 3,646 4.1%
Independent living difficulty 6,017 7.9%
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table S1810]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 57
2025-2029
Persons with Alcohol or Other Drug Addictions

The Substance Abuse Prevention and Control (SAPC) division of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health tracks substance use disorder (SUD) treatment data across the county. Per SAPC’s most recent report for the 2023–2024 fiscal year, a total of 34,229 unique patients accounted for 56,196 treatment admissions. Of these individuals, 10 percent resided in Service Planning Area (SPA) 8. Alcohol was the most reported primary substance at admission (29 percent), followed closely by methamphetamine (29 percent) and prescription drugs (17 percent). The most frequently reported age range for first primary substance use was 12 to 17 years old (42 percent), highlighting the early onset of substance use among a significant portion of individuals seeking treatment.

Victims of Domestic Violence

Pinpointing specific numbers of domestic violence victims is difficult due to the lack of reporting and other mitigating factors. However, the California Department of Justice received 257 domestic violence-related calls for assistance in 2023 from residents of Carson, nearly identical to the number of calls in 2022 (255).

What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations and how are these needs determined?

The housing and supportive service needs of these populations were identified through multiple sources, including community and stakeholder meetings, as well as responses to surveys distributed to the community and identified stakeholders.

The Community Needs Assessment Survey results highlight affordable rental housing for seniors as the top housing priority, with 67 percent of respondents identifying it as one of the top three most critical needs. Other significant housing needs include affordable for-sale housing (with 63 percent of respondents identifying it as one of the top three most critical needs) and affordable rental housing for individuals and families with low to moderate incomes (with 40 percent of respondents identifying it as one of the top three most critical needs).

In terms of supportive services, the Community Needs Assessment Survey respondents ranked services for neglected and abused children as the highest priority, with 73 percent of respondents identifying it as a critical need. Other key services identified included centers and services for people with disabilities (with 67 percent of respondents identifying it as one of the

Consolidated Plan CARSON 58
2025-2029
top three most critical needs) and domestic violence services (with 50 percent of respondents identifying it as one of the top three most critical needs).

Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their families within the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area:

Individuals affected by HIV and/or AIDS represent a special needs population with unique challenges. The 2023 Los Angeles County Annual HIV Surveillance Report outlines the status of the HIV epidemic in the county. Key findings from the report include the following:
• As of year-end 2023, 51,796 Los Angeles County residents (including adolescent, adult and pediatric cases) were living with diagnosed HIV. This number excludes undiagnosed persons living with HIV.
• In 2022, 1,641 persons aged 13 years and older were newly diagnosed with HIV. • HIV diagnosis rates vary by population and location, with significant disparities. Males have a higher rate of new HIV diagnoses (35 per 100,000) compared to females (5 per 100,000).
• Black persons had higher rates of HIV diagnosis compared with all other racial and ethnic groups.

Discussion

Please see above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 59
2025-2029
NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 (f)

Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Facilities

Based on the Community Needs Assessment Survey, youth centers were identified as the top priority among critical community facility needs, with 43 percent of respondents ranking them as one of the top three most critical needs. Other key public facility priorities included senior centers (with 40 percent of respondents ranking them as one of the top three most critical needs) and community centers and healthcare facilities (both with 37 percent of respondents ranking them as one of the top three most critical needs), highlighting the importance of facilities that support families and youth in Carson.

How were these needs determined?

Public facilities needs were identified through multiple sources, including community and stakeholder meetings and responses to surveys distributed to the community and identified stakeholders.

Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Improvements

According to the Community Needs Assessment Survey, public safety improvements emerged as the top priority among critical infrastructure needs, with 47 percent of respondents identifying them as one of the top three most critical needs. Other key priorities included access to broadband internet (with 33 percent of respondents ranking them as one of the top three most critical needs) and bike/walking paths (with 30 percent of respondents ranking them as one of the top three most critical needs). Additionally, sidewalks, streets/alleys, and water/sewer improvements were equally ranked, with 27 percent of respondents ranking them as one of the top three most critical needs. These findings highlight the community’s emphasis on enhancing safety, connectivity, and essential infrastructure services.

How were these needs determined?

Public improvement needs were identified through multiple sources, including community and stakeholder meetings and responses to surveys distributed to the community and identified stakeholders.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 60
2025-2029
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services

Based on the Community Needs Assessment Survey, crime prevention programs were identified as the top priority among critical community service needs, with 50 percent of respondents ranking them as one of the top three most critical needs. Other key public service priorities included emergency preparedness (with 47 percent of respondents ranking them as one of the top three most critical needs) and childcare centers and services (with 40 percent of respondents ranking them as one of the top three most critical needs). These services are critical to improving safety, stability, and overall well-being for residents, particularly those in households with low to moderate incomes.

How were these needs determined?

Public services needs were identified through multiple sources, including community and stakeholder meetings and responses to surveys distributed to the community and identified stakeholders.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 61
2025-2029
Housing Market Analysis
MA-05 Overview
The Housing Market Analysis includes the following sections:
• MA-10 Housing Market Analysis: Number of Housing Units • MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing
• MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing
• MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing
• MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services
• MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services
• MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing
• MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets
• MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion
• MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing Occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households
• MA-65 Hazard Mitigation

Housing Market Analysis Overview

Table MA-05.01 presents the median sales price of single-family homes from 2020 to 2024, as reported by the California Association of Realtors. During this period, the median sales price increased by 35 percent, reflecting a significant rise in housing costs.

Table MA-

05.01:

Median Sales
Price of
Single-Family
Homes
Year
(Year to Date
as of October) Median Sales Price
2020 $583,500
2021 $697,450
2022 $795,000
2023 $751,500
2024 $790,000
Source: California Association of Realtors

Consolidated Plan CARSON 62
2025-2029
MA-10 Number of Housing Units – 91.210(a)&(b)(2)

Introduction

Table MA-10.01 provides an overview of housing units in Carson by type. Between 2017 and 2022, the total number of housing units increased by 4 percent. As of 2022, single-family homes comprised 79 percent of the housing stock, while apartment units accounted for 12 percent.

Table MA-10.01: Housing by Count of Units
Property Type 2017 Five-Year ACS 2022 Five-Year ACS
Number % of Total Number % of Total
1-unit detached
structure 18,307 70.1% 19,630 72.1%
1-unit, attached
structure 1,936 7.4% 1,796 6.6%
2-4 units 759 2.9% 577 2.1%
5-19 units 1,269 4.9% 1,021 3.7%
20 or more units 1,459 5.6% 1,794 6.6%
Mobile Home,
boat, RV, van,
etc.
2,389 9.2% 2,418 8.9%
Total 26,119 100.0% 27,236 100.0%
Data Source: 2013-2017 & 2018-2022 ACS [Table DP04]

Table MA-10.02 shows housing units by tenure from 2017 to 2022. In 2022, 72 percent were owner-occupied, while 24 percent were renter-occupied and 4 percent were vacant.

Table MA-10.02: Housing Units by Tenure
Tenure
2017 Five-Year ACS 2022 Five-Year ACS
Population % of Total Population % of Total
Occupied Housing Units 25,381 97.2% 26,084 95.8%
Owner-Occupied 18,916 72.4% 19,496 71.6%
Renter-Occupied 6,465 24.8% 6,588 24.2%
Vacant Housing Units 738 2.8% 1,152 4.2%
Total 26,119 100.0% 27,236 100.0%
Data Source: 2013-2017 & 2018-2022 ACS [Table DP04]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 63
2025-2029
Table MA-10.03 shows housing units by the year built, based on 2017 and 2022 five-year ACS estimates. Most housing units in Carson were built between 1950 and 1969, comprising 55 percent in 2022.

Table MA-10.03: Housing Units by Year Home Built
Year Built
2017 Five-Year ACS 2022 Five-Year ACS
Population % of Total Population % of Total
Built 2020 or later 0 0.0% 79 0.3%
Built 2010 to 2019 514 2.0% 666 2.4%
Built 2000 to 2009 1,329 5.1% 1,522 5.6%
Built 1990 to 1999 1,026 3.9% 1,038 3.8%
Built 1980 to 1989 2,303 8.8% 2,126 7.8%
Built 1970 to 1979 3,819 14.6% 3,677 13.5%
Built 1960 to 1969 8,645 33.1% 8,756 32.1%
Built 1950 to 1959 5,618 21.5% 6,284 23.1%
Built 1940 to 1949 1,951 7.5% 2,425 8.9%
Built 1939 or earlier 914 3.5% 663 2.4%
Total 26,119 100.0% 27,236 100.0%
Data Source: 2013-2017 & 2018-2022 ACS [Table DP04]

Table MA-10.04 shows the distribution of housing units in Carson by size and tenure, based on 2022 five-year ACS data. Among homeowners, the majority (82 percent) reside in units with three or more bedrooms. Among renters, unit sizes are more evenly distributed. While 44 percent of renters occupy units with three or more bedrooms, 36 percent reside in two- bedroom units, 16 percent reside in one-bedroom units, and 4 percent reside in studios or efficiency units.

Table MA-10.04: Occupied Housing Units by Bedroom Count and Tenure Owners Renters
Number % Number %
No bedroom 94 0.5% 294 4%
1 bedroom 322 2% 1,030 16%
2 bedrooms 3,015 15% 2,378 36%
3 or more bedrooms 16,065 82% 2,886 44%
Total 19,496 100% 6,588 100%
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table B25042]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 64
2025-2029
Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of units assisted with federal, state, and local programs.

Programs will target households that experience housing problems in the City of Carson. As shown in Table NA-10.08, an estimated 3,415 renter households and 4,660 owner households experience cost burden, overcrowding, and/or substandard housing. To improve housing stability and affordability, programs will prioritize assistance for low- and moderate-income households, including families, seniors, and individuals with disabilities.

Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts.

Carson’s 2021-2029 Housing Element includes an evaluation of low-income multifamily rental units at risk of becoming market rate housing within the 2021-2031 at-risk housing analysis period.

The Carson Gardens Apartments includes 100 assisted units and is considered at moderate risk of conversion, since the Section 8 contract with HUD will expire in 2031, according to HUD’s Multifamily Assistance and Section 8 Database as of December 2021.

Additionally, Grace Manor includes 30 assisted units and is considered at very high risk of conversion, because the Section 8 contract expires in 2022, according to HUD’s Multifamily Assistance and Section 8 Database as of December 2021. According to contract renewal information provided by HUD’s Multifamily Property/Contract/Rent & Utility Allowance Datasets, a 12-month contract with HUD for Grace Manor was renewed in July 2021. Grace Manor is owned by the Long Beach Affordable Housing Coalition (LBAHC), which is a non-profit Community Development Corporation (CDC). It is likely that the LBAHC will continue to maintain the project as affordable housing during the planning period by continuing to enter into 12-month contracts with HUD.

Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population?

As highlighted in the Needs Assessment section and reinforced by public input, the current housing stock in Carson does not adequately meet the needs of the population. This is most evident in the high rate of cost burden and severe cost burden among residents. As shown in Table NA-10.16, according to 2022 five-year CHAS data, 48 percent of renters and 26 percent of homeowners are cost-burdened, meaning they spend more than 30 percent of their income on

Consolidated Plan CARSON 65
2025-2029
housing. These households are the most likely to be living in units that do not fully meet their needs.

Describe the need for specific types of housing.

Based on the Community Needs Assessment Survey, affordable rental housing for seniors was identified as the top priority among housing needs, with 67 percent of respondents ranking it as one of the top three critical needs. Other key housing priorities included affordable for-sale housing (with 63 percent of respondents ranking it as one of the top three critical needs), and affordable rental housing for individuals and families with low to moderate incomes (with 40 percent of respondents ranking it as one of the top three critical needs).

Discussion

See above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 66
2025-2029
MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a)

Introduction

As in much of California, housing costs in Carson have risen over the past decade. The following section provides information on the cost of housing in Carson.

Table MA-15.01: Cost of Housing
Base Year: 2017 Most Recent Year: 2022 % Change
Median Home Value $402,500 $616,000 53%
Median Contract Rent $1,329 $1,675 26%
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS (Base Year), 2018-2022 ACS (Most Recent Year) [Table B25077 – Median Home Value & Table B25058 – Median Contract Rent]

Table MA-15.02: Rent Paid for Renter-Occupied Housing Units Rent Paid Number %
Less than $500 193 3%
$500-999 846 13%
$1,000-1,499 1,076 17%
$1,500-1,999 1,646 26%
$2,000 or more 2543 40%
Total 6,304 100%
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table B25063]

Table MA-15.03: Housing Affordability
Number of Units
affordable to Households
earning
Renter Owner
30% HAMFI 520 No Data
50% HAMFI 1,580 950
80% HAMFI 3,750 2,030
100% HAMFI No Data 3,520
Total 5,850 6,500
Data Source: 2016-2020 CHAS

Consolidated Plan CARSON 67
2025-2029
Table MA-15.04: Monthly Rent – Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale HUD Metro FMR Area Monthly Rent Efficiency
(no
bedroom)
1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
3 Bedroom
4 Bedroom
Fair Market
Rent $1,777 $2,006 $2,544 $3,263 $3,600
High HOME
Rent $1,559 $1,671 $2,007 $2,310 $2,558
Low HOME
Rent $1,213 $1,300 $1,560 $1,803 $2,011
Data Source: 2024 HUD FMR and HOME Rents

Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels?

The housing needs and cost burden analysis in the Needs Assessment highlight significant housing challenges faced by a substantial segment of the Carson population, particularly households with low incomes. These households are disproportionately affected by cost burdens, indicating a lack of sufficient housing options that are affordable to all income levels.

Public input reinforced this finding, with community members emphasizing the urgent need for more affordable housing for lower-income households. This highlights the importance of expanding housing options and assistance programs to better serve Carson residents.

How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to home values and/or rents?

Housing prices in Carson have risen significantly in recent years. If this trend continues, rising rents and home values will place more households under financial strain.

How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable housing?

Table MA-15.04 shows the current HUD fair market rents for rental housing, as well as the allowable high and low HOME rents. These rents are the upper limits of rents that can be charged by property owners with units assisted by HUD rental housing programs. Increasing rents in the region’s market have widened the gap between HUD FMRs and market rents, creating problems for low-income households seeking units that will accept their HUD voucher for rent assistance.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 68
2025-2029
Discussion

Housing costs in Carson remain out of reach for many households with low to moderate incomes, as reflected in the high proportion facing cost burdens and other housing challenges.

Housing affordability is expected to remain a major issue, highlighting the need for more affordable housing options.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 69
2025-2029
MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a) Introduction

The following section provides information on the condition of housing in the City of Carson.

Describe the jurisdiction's definition of "standard condition" and "substandard condition but suitable for rehabilitation":

The City of Carson defines standard and substandard housing condition based on California Health and Safety Code. California Health and Safety Code Section 17920.3 defines a substandard structure as any building or portion thereof in which there exists any of the following conditions to an extent that endangers the life, limb, health, property, safety, or welfare of the occupants, nearby residents, or the public:
• Inadequate sanitation (including lack of or improper bathroom facilities, running water, and heating);
• Structural hazards;
• Any nuisance;
• Faulty wiring;
• Unsafe or improper plumbing;
• Unsafe or improper mechanical equipment;
• Faulty weather protection;
• Conditions that could cause or augment the spread of a fire or explosion; • Unsafe or improper construction materials;
• Debris constituting a fire, health, or safety hazard; • Inadequate maintenance;
• Inadequate exits;
• Inadequate fire protection; or
• Space occupied for living, sleeping, cooking, or dining that were not intended for those purposes.

A standard housing condition is one in which none of the above conditions exist.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 70
2025-2029
As shown in Table MA-20.01 below, 31 percent of owner-occupied units and 56 percent of renter-occupied units in Carson have one or two selected physical or financial conditions. Note that the conditions are identical to the following four housing problems: (1) lacking complete plumbing facilities, (2) lacking complete kitchen facilities, (3) more than one occupant per room, and (4) housing costs greater than 30 percent of household income.

Table MA-20.01: Condition of Units
Condition of Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
With one selected Condition 5,715 29% 3,059 46%
With two selected Conditions 371 2% 634 10%
With three selected Conditions 37 0% 0 0%
With four selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0%
No selected Conditions 13,373 69% 2,895 44%
Total 19,496 100% 6,588 100%
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table B25123]

As shown in Table MA-20.02 below, most owner-occupied and renter-occupied housing in Carson was built between 1950 and 1979. Many of these units, particularly those occupied by lower-income households, may require rehabilitation.

Table MA-20.02: Year Unit Built
Year Unit Built Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
2000 or later 1,596 8% 671 10%
1980-1999 1,958 10% 1,026 16%
1950-1979 13,864 71% 3,996 61%
Before 1950 2,078 11% 895 14%
Total 19,496 100% 6,588 100%
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table B25036]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 71
2025-2029
Table MA-20.03 compares the status of vacant units in Carson in 2017 and 2022. By 2022, 31 percent of vacant units were for seasonal, recreational, or occasional use.

Table MA-20.03: Status of Vacant Housing Units
Status of Vacant Housing Units 2017 Five-Year ACS 2022 Five-Year ACS Units % of Total Units % of Total
For rent 96 13.0% 102 8.9%
Rented, not occupied 54 7.3% 0 -
For sale only 94 12.7% 57 4.9%
Sold, not occupied 65 8.8% 97 8.4%
For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 96 13.0% 359 31.2% For migrant workers 0 - 0 -
Other vacant 333 45.1% 537 46.6%
Total 738 100.0% 1,152 100.0%
Data Source: 2013-2017 & 2018-2022 ACS [Table B25004]

Table MA-20.04: Vacant Units
Suitable for
Rehabilitation
Not Suitable for
Rehabilitation
Total
Vacant Units Information on this table was not populated from the HUD IDIS system. Abandoned Vacant Units
REO Properties
Abandoned REO Properties

Table MA-20.05: Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Number % Number %
Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 15,942 82% 4,891 74% Housing Units Built before 1980 with Children 6 Years
Old or Younger Present 2,105 11% 969 15%
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table B25036] (Total Units); 2017-2021 CHAS [Table 13] (Units with Children present)

Consolidated Plan CARSON 72
2025-2029
Table MA-20.06: Vintage of Households by Income and Presence of Young Children Income
One or more
children age 6 or
younger
No children age 6
or younger Total
Built 1939 or Earlier
0-30% AMI 40 60 100
>30-50% AMI 0 35 35
>50-80% AMI 29 145 174
>80-100% AMI 25 55 80
>100% AMI 35 220 255
Total 129 515 644
Built 1940-1979
0-30% AMI 275 2,430 2,705
>30-50% AMI 450 1,830 2,280
>50-80% AMI 560 3,440 4,000
>80-100% AMI 550 2,055 2,605
>100% AMI 1,110 7,610 8,720
Total 2,945 17,365 20,310
Built 1980 or Later
0-30% AMI 95 835 930
>30-50% AMI 125 350 475
>50-80% AMI 110 760 870
>80-100% AMI 80 315 395
>100% AMI 235 2,210 2,445
Total 645 4,470 5,115
Total
0-30% AMI 410 3,325 3,735
>30-50% AMI 575 2,215 2,790
>50-80% AMI 699 4,345 5,044
>80-100% AMI 655 2,425 3,080
>100% AMI 1,380 10,040 11,420
Total 3,719 22,350 26,069
Data Source: 2017-2021 CHAS

Describe the need for owner and rental rehabilitation based on the condition of the jurisdiction's housing.

As shown in Table MA-20.02 above, approximately 80 percent of occupied housing units in Carson were built before 1980, highlighting the City's aging housing stock and the growing need for both owner and rental rehabilitation. Older housing stock presents challenges such as

Consolidated Plan CARSON 73
2025-2029
deferred maintenance, outdated infrastructure, and potential health hazards, including lead- based paint exposure. The rising costs of labor and materials, coupled with stagnant wages, make it difficult for many homeowners and landlords to afford necessary repairs, often resulting in deteriorating housing conditions.

Most affected by these conditions are low-income seniors and those with disabilities who do not have the resources, and in many instances, the physical capabilities to maintain their residences. Owners of aging rental units also may face challenges when there is insufficient cash flow to enable them to keep abreast of the maintenance and rehabilitation needs of their units.

Estimate the number of housing units within the jurisdiction that are occupied by low- or moderate-income families that contain lead-based paint hazards. 91.205(e), 91.405

Lead-based paint hazards are most commonly found in homes built before 1980. As shown in Tables MA-20.02 and MA-20.05 above, approximately 82 percent of owner-occupied and 74 percent of renter-occupied units were built before 1980, making them potential sources of lead exposure. Among these older units, 11 percent of owner-occupied and 15 percent of renter- occupied homes have children present, a population particularly vulnerable to lead poisoning.

To better estimate the number of housing units occupied by low- or moderate-income families that may contain lead-based paint hazards, Table MA-20.06 provides a breakdown of households living in pre-1980 units by income level. The high percentage of older rental units, combined with the presence of children in these homes, underscores the ongoing need for lead hazard remediation efforts, particularly in rental housing occupied by lower-income families.

Discussion

Please see above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 74
2025-2029
MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210(b)
Introduction

The Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles (HACoLA) administers Public Housing and Housing Choice Voucher programs for jurisdictions throughout Los Angeles County, including Carson. No public housing units are within Carson’s boundaries. Table MA-25.01 below summarizes existing housing vouchers administered by the HACoLA countywide (not only within Carson).

Table MA-25.01: Totals Number of Units by Program Type
Program Type
Certificate Mod-
Rehab
Public
Housing
Vouchers
Total Project
-based
Tenant -
based

Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled
*
# of units
vouchers
available 0 261 2,962 21,798 1 21,797 1,264 1,357 558
# of
accessible
units

*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)

Describe the supply of public housing developments:

Not applicable.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 75
2025-2029
Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an approved Public Housing Agency Plan Table MA-25.02: Public Housing Condition
Public Housing Development Average Inspection Score

N/A N/A

Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in the jurisdiction:

Not applicable.

Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment of low- and moderate-income families residing in public housing:

Not applicable.

Discussion

Not applicable.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 76
2025-2029
MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210(c)

Introduction

Table MA-30.01: Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households – Los Angeles Continuum of Care Totals Emergency Shelter Beds Transitional
Housing Beds
Permanent Supportive Housing
Beds
Year Round Beds
(Current & New)
Voucher /
Seasonal /
Overflow Beds
Current & New Current & New Under
Development
Households with Adult(s) and
Child(ren) 8,371 Unknown 938 5,888 Unknown
Households with Only Adults 15,165 Unknown 2,049 20,348 Unknown Chronically Homeless Households 0 Unknown 0 4,138 Unknown Veterans 256 Unknown 653 6,242 Unknown
Unaccompanied Youth 114 Unknown 1 12 Unknown
Data Source: 2024 Los Angeles Continuum of Care Housing Inventory Count

Consolidated Plan CARSON 77
2025-2029
Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are used to complement services targeted to homeless persons

Mainstream services, including health care, mental health support, and employment services, are essential in addressing the broader challenges that contribute to housing instability and homelessness. These services are integrated within the Los Angeles County CoC through partnerships with non-profit organizations, government agencies, and specialized service providers.

Through LAHSA, funding, program design, outcomes assessment, and technical assistance are provided to more than 100 non-profit partner agencies. These agencies deliver a continuum of programs ranging from outreach, access centers, emergency shelters, safe havens, transitional and permanent housing, and homelessness prevention services. They also offer the supportive services necessary to help individuals develop the skills and stability needed for long-term housing security.

In addition to coordinating service providers, LAHSA collaborates with both the City and County of Los Angeles to integrate mainstream services and housing opportunities, ensuring a broad and equitable distribution of resources throughout the Los Angeles County CoC. This partnership enhances access to health care, mental health treatment, substance use disorder services, workforce development programs, and other critical interventions that promote housing retention and self-sufficiency.

List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. If the services and facilities are listed on screen SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure or screen MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services, describe how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these populations.

Numerous homeless service providers in Los Angeles County operate as part of the Los Angeles County CoC. These service providers offer a comprehensive range of support beyond housing and shelter, including employment training, counseling, financial literacy, legal aid, childcare, and transportation services. These wraparound services help individuals and families experiencing homelessness address barriers to stable housing, secure employment, and achieve long-term self-sufficiency.

Additionally, the City of Carson partners with local service providers to meet the needs of individuals and families experiencing homelessness. These partnerships help ensure that

Consolidated Plan CARSON 78
2025-2029
emergency shelter, transitional housing, meal programs, healthcare, and supportive services are accessible to those in need. The City collaborates with key organizations, such as Harbor Interfaith Services, and Beacon Light Mission in conjunction with LAHSA to connect homeless individuals and families with available resources and long-term housing solutions. By leveraging partnerships and integrating supportive services, the City aims to provide comprehensive, person-centered assistance that moves individuals from homelessness to stable housing.

Furthermore, the City of Carson’s Public Safety Engagement Officer team collaborates with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) to conduct targeted outreach to individuals experiencing homelessness, particularly those who are unsheltered. SBCCOG has partnered with Watts Labor Community Action Committee (WLCAC), and Los Angeles Homeless Authority (LAHSA) a statewide network of service providers specializing in homelessness response. The City’s Public Safety Engagement Officer team serves as the first point of contact for unhoused individuals in Carson. Our outreach team directly engages with unsheltered individuals, building trust to assess their specific needs and connect them to essential services. For ongoing case management, we collaborate with WLCAC and LAHSA, which provide services such as housing assistance, interim housing, veterans' services, mental health care, medical services, employment support, and benefits enrollment. Through comprehensive, person-centered support, our collective goal is to help individuals transition from homelessness to stable housing and improved well-being. Through this coordinated approach, the City and its partners provide a comprehensive and person-centered response to homelessness, ensuring that individuals receive the support needed to transition into stable housing and improve their overall quality of life.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 79
2025-2029
MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210(d)

Introduction

The City will continue to maintain and coordinate services to assist individuals with special needs. Existing service providers will be supported when possible and existing funds will be prioritized and expended when appropriate and feasible.

Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental), persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, public housing residents and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify, and describe their supportive housing needs

The housing and supportive service needs of Carson’s special needs populations were identified through multiple sources, including community and stakeholder meetings, as well as responses to surveys distributed to the community and identified stakeholders.

The Community Needs Assessment Survey responses highlight affordable rental housing for seniors as the top housing priority, with 67 percent of respondents identifying it as a top three critical need. Other significant housing needs include affordable for-sale housing (with 63 percent of respondents identifying it as a top three critical need) and affordable rental housing for individuals and families with low to moderate incomes (with 40 percent of respondents identifying it as a top three critical need).

In terms of supportive services, the Community Needs Assessment Survey responses revealed that services for neglected and abused children ranked as the highest priority, with 73 percent of respondents identifying it as a top three critical need. Other key service needs include centers and services for people with disabilities (with 67 percent of respondents identifying it as a top three critical need) and domestic violence services (with 50 percent of respondents identifying it as a top three critical need).

Supportive housing for the elderly, persons with disabilities, individuals with addictions, and those living with HIV/AIDS is designed to promote independent living while providing necessary services. Individuals recovering from substance abuse may need short-term rehabilitation, counseling, or case management, whereas those with chronic conditions often require long- term assisted living, nursing care, and transportation services.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 80
2025-2029
Persons with mental or physical disabilities benefit from affordable housing paired with flexible supportive services that enable them to access and maintain stable housing. Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities may require additional resources, such as housing set-asides and specialized supportive housing programs, to ensure they have access to safe and appropriate living environments.

Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing

Persons returning from mental and physical health institutions may benefit from permanent supportive housing and other housing assistance programs designed to ensure long-term stability and prevent homelessness. In Los Angeles County, several agencies receive Measure H funding to provide permanent housing and support services, including the Departments of Health Services (DHS), Mental Health (DMH), Public Health (DPH), Children and Family Services (DCFS), and Public Social Services (DPSS), as well as the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) and the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA).

Permanent supportive housing is a type of permanent housing that provides long-term rental subsidies and Intensive Case Management Services (ICMS) to individuals who have experienced chronic homelessness and have disabilities, chronic medical conditions, and/or behavioral health conditions. By integrating housing with supportive services, permanent supportive housing ensures that individuals can access medical care, mental health treatment, and social services to maintain stability and independence.

Within this model, rapid rehousing programs provide time-limited rental subsidies to quickly house people who have recently become homeless and offer them services until they can gradually take on the rent themselves. Additionally, shallow subsidy programs provide a long- term rental subsidy to help people avoid homelessness or reentry into homelessness. This is a lower level of assistance, often based on a set monthly amount, unlike traditional “deep subsidies” such as those provided through permanent supportive housing or the federally- funded Housing Choice Vouchers, also called Section 8 Vouchers.

By integrating affordable housing with essential support services, these programs create a pathway to stability for individuals exiting health institutions, ensuring they have the resources needed to maintain housing, access healthcare, and reintegrate into the community.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 81
2025-2029
Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. 91.315(e)

Please see below.

For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs. Link to one-year goals. (91.220(2))

The Carson Housing Authority (not a public housing authority in the sense that that term is commonly understood, but an entity that was created to continue the remaining affordable housing obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency) has provided financial assistance in the development of, and continues to assist through the provision of rental subsidies, at the following developments:
• Carson City Center, 720 E. Carson St. (86 senior units) • Carson Terrace, 625 E. 219th St. (61 senior units)
• Avalon Courtyard, 22121 Avalon Blvd. (41 senior units) • Bella Vita/Sepulveda Senior Housing, 402 Sepulveda Blvd. (65 senior units) • Veterans Village, 600 W. Carson St. (50 units for veterans, scheduled to open during PY 2020)

Consolidated Plan CARSON 82
2025-2029
MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210(e)

Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential Investment

Based on the City’s previous work in its 2020 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, the following list of barriers to affordable housing in the City were identified:
• High levels of segregation
• Access to school proficiency
• Insufficient affordable housing in a range of unit sizes • Discriminatory patterns in lending
• Insufficient accessible affordable housing
• Lack of fair housing infrastructure
• Insufficient fair housing education
• Insufficient understanding of credit

Consolidated Plan CARSON 83
2025-2029
MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f)

Introduction

Carson’s strategic location within the dynamic South Bay region of Los Angeles County makes it a prime destination for businesses looking to access key markets across Southern California.

With excellent connectivity via the San Diego (405), Harbor (110), and Artesia (91) freeways, as well as proximity to world-class port and airport infrastructure, Carson offers businesses unparalleled logistical advantages. Additionally, the city benefits from a large resident workforce, stable residential neighborhoods with high homeownership rates, and potential recreational and placemaking opportunities along the Dominguez Channel. These strengths, combined with Carson’s well-established business and institutional assets, create a strong foundation for economic growth and investment.

Economic Development Market Analysis

The following tables provide a detailed analysis of the composition of Carson’s workforce, the alignment between jobs and workers across various sectors, and disparities in job availability within specific industries. The tables also detail unemployment rates, occupational sectors, and educational attainment, shedding light on the challenges and opportunities within Carson’s labor market.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 84
2025-2029
Table MA-45.01: Business Activity
Business by Sector Number of
Workers
Number of
Jobs
Share of
Workers%
Share of Jobs
%
Jobs less
Workers%
Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction 106 227 0.2% 0.6% 0.4% Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 2,976 3,078 6.1% 8.0% 1.9% Construction 3,152 1,430 6.5% 3.7% -2.8%
Education and Health Care Services 5,522 9,638 11.3% 25.2% 13.9% Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 844 1,669 1.8% 4.3% 2.5% Information 178 889 0.4% 2.3% 1.9%
Manufacturing 8,216 3,638 16.8% 9.5% -7.3%
Other Services 1,439 979 2.9% 2.6% -0.3%
Professional, Scientific, Management Services 3,129 2,931 6.4% 7.7% 1.3% Public Administration 60 1,907 0.1% 5.0% 4.9%
Retail Trade 5,211 3,579 10.7% 9.4% -1.3%
Transportation & Warehousing 8,843 3,645 18.1% 9.5% -8.6% Wholesale Trade 5,012 1,873 10.3% 4.9% -5.4%
Grand Total 48,833 38,277 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Note: In the “Jobs less workers %” column, a negative number reflects an oversupply of labor for the sector (more workers than jobs) and a positive number reflects an undersupply of labor (more jobs than workers). Number of workers are based on where workers live; number of jobs are based on where workers are employed. Both analyses are based on primary jobs.

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics OnTheMap, 2021

Consolidated Plan CARSON 85
2025-2029
Table MA-45.02: Labor Force
Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 48,702
Civilian Employed Population 16 years and
over 45,363
Unemployment Rate 6.9%
Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 11.6%
Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-64 6.4%
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Tables DP03 & B23001]

Table MA-45.03: Occupations by Sector
Sector Number of People
Management, business, science, and arts 15,258
Service 8,937
Sales and office 9,592
Natural resources, construction, and maintenance 4,141 Production, transportation and material moving 7,435
Total 45,363
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table S2401]

Table MA-45.04: Travel Time
Travel Time Number of Commuters Percentage of Total
< 30 Minutes 24,732 60%
30-59 Minutes 12,364 30%
60 or More Minutes 3,845 9%
Total 40,941 100%
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table B08303]

Table MA-45.05: Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 25 to 64 Years) Educational Attainment
In Labor Force
Civilian
Employed
Civilian
Unemployed
Not in
Labor Force
Less than high school graduate 5,133 439 2,924
High school graduate (includes
equivalency) 7,550 471 3,206
Some college or associate’s
degree 11,882 897 3,085
Bachelor’s degree or higher 13,151 772 1,637
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table B23006]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 86
2025-2029
Table MA-45.06: Educational Attainment by Age
Educational Attainment Age
18–24 yrs 25–34 yrs 35–44 yrs 45–65 yrs 65+ yrs
Less than 9th grade 7 324 719 2,553 2,342
9th to 12th grade, no
diploma 742 1,170 1,535 2,195 1,080
High school graduate,
GED, or alternative 2,077 2,800 2,494 5,933 3,563
Some college, no degree 4,397 3,629 2,705 5,347 3,628
Associate’s degree 654 1,665 749 1,789 1,238
Bachelor’s degree 625 2,969 2,248 6,037 3,349
Graduate or professional
degree 102 866 1,344 2,119 1,045
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table B15001]

Table MA-45.07: Educational Attainment – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months for Population 25 Years and Over
Educational Attainment Median Earnings in
the Past 12 Months
Less than high school graduate $29,936
High school graduate (includes equivalency) $40,226
Some college or associate’s degree $44,726
Bachelor’s degree $60,614
Graduate or professional degree $91,810
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [B20004]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 87
2025-2029
Table MA-45.08: Employment and Median Earnings Industry for Population 16 Years and Over with Earnings
Industry Total Civilian
Employed
Population
Median
Earnings
Health Care 9,176 $55,980
Professional Services 4,859 $49,485
Retail 3,826 $30,843
Manufacturing 3,703 $59,292
Transportation and Warehousing 3,701 $47,345
Education 3,272 $51,147
Accommodation & Food Services 2,781 $21,545
Construction 2,624 $44,313
Public Administration 2,249 $75,301
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation 1,600 $27,031
Wholesale Trade 1,561 $43,869
Other 1,482 $34,054
Finance & Insurance 1,443 $59,604
Information 1,130 $58,091
Real Estate 518 $47,439
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting 150 $38,625
Utilities 77 $89,205
TOTAL 44,152
Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table S2413]

Consolidated Plan CARSON 88
2025-2029
Figure MA-45.01: Median Income and Employment by Industry

Data Source: 2018-2022 ACS [Table S2413]

Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction?

As shown in Table MA-45.01, the three sectors with the greatest number of jobs in Carson are Education and Health Care Services (25 percent of jobs), Transportation & Warehousing (10 percent of jobs), and Manufacturing (10 percent of jobs). These three sectors also employ the largest share of workers, as follows: Transportation & Warehousing (18 percent of workers), Manufacturing (17 percent of workers), and Education and Health Care Services (11 percent of workers).

In several sectors, the number of workers exceeds the number of jobs, meaning that residents employed in these sectors are commuting to other jurisdictions to work. For example, there are only 3,645 Transportation & Warehousing jobs in the City, but 8,843 workers. At the other end of the spectrum, there are more jobs than workers in the Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate sector, indicating that additional people are commuting into the City for work. Overall, there are about 48,833 workers in the City, but just about 38,277 jobs.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 89
2025-2029
As shown in Table MA-45.02, the overall unemployment rate in Carson is 6.9 percent, according to 2022 five-year ACS estimates. However, California Employment Development Department data from December 2024 indicates that the overall unemployment rate is 5.5 percent.

Unemployment is notably higher among younger workers, with a rate of 11.6 percent for those aged 16 to 24, compared to workers aged 25 to 64 (6.4 percent).

Table MA-45.04 shows the commuting patterns of the City’s workers. Most workers drive less than 30 minutes to their place of employment (60 percent). Only 9 percent of workers drive more than an hour to work. Longer commute times lead to greater transportation costs, more greenhouse gas emissions, and a range of health issues.

Educational attainment strongly correlates with labor force participation and employment rates. As shown in Table MA-45.05, of the population aged 25 to 64 years old with less than a high school diploma, 34 percent are not participating in the labor force. In contrast, only 11 percent of individuals with a bachelor’s degree or higher are not in the labor force. This data indicates that higher education levels increase the likelihood of employment.

Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community.

The workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community in Carson were identified through community engagement, stakeholder meetings, survey responses, and the City's 2023 Economic Development Strategic Plan. The Community Needs Assessment Survey identified job creation and retention as the top economic development priority, with 57 percent of respondents citing it as a top three critical need. Other key workforce-related needs include employment training (with 50 percent of respondents ranking it as a top three critical need) and small business grants/loans (with 47 percent of respondents ranking it as a top three critical need).

The Economic Development Strategic Plan outlines key infrastructure improvements to support economic growth, particularly within Downtown Carson and key commercial corridors.

Infrastructure priorities include multi-modal connectivity (such as walking and bicycle paths), streetscape beautification, public transit improvements, and broadband expansion. The plan also emphasizes workforce development efforts, including partnerships with local and regional agencies to strengthen workforce training programs and a showcase workforce development program focused on construction and related industries to preserve and grow critical skill sets.

Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect

Consolidated Plan CARSON 90
2025-2029
job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create.

In 2022, the City of Carson, in partnership with Los Angeles County, established the Carson Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD), which encompasses approximately 1,735 acres (14 percent of the City’s land area). The purpose of the EIFD is to generate tax increment revenue to finance critical public infrastructure improvements, affordable and workforce housing, environmental remediation, and brownfield redevelopment. The Carson EIFD is expected to play a major role in economic development by providing funding for infrastructure projects that support local businesses, attract new investment, and enhance overall economic activity.

The Economic Development Strategic Plan also outlines several initiatives that will impact workforce development and business growth. These include targeted capital improvements in Downtown Carson, a shuttle system connecting key employment and commercial hubs, and streetscape enhancements to create a more vibrant business environment. Additionally, the Plan prioritizes broadband expansion, which is critical for modern businesses and workforce training programs.

Collectively, these upcoming improvements and investments will position Carson for sustained economic growth, attracting businesses, creating jobs, and improving the community’s overall quality of life.

How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction?

As shown in Table MA-45.05, the workforce data for Carson demonstrates a strong relationship between educational attainment and employment opportunities. Individuals with a bachelor’s degree show high levels of employment among those in the labor force, with 13,151 employed and 772 unemployed, indicating a strong demand for highly skilled workers. Individuals with less than a high school diploma face more limited job prospects, with 5,133 employed and 439
unemployed.

Additionally, the relationship between education and earnings is clear. As shown in Table MA-

45.07, median earnings for Carson residents aged 25 years old and above without a high school diploma are $29,936, while high school graduates earn a median income of $40,226, representing a 34 percent increase. Earnings continue to rise with higher education levels.

Those with a bachelor’s degree have median earnings of $60,614, and individuals with a

Consolidated Plan CARSON 91
2025-2029
graduate or professional degree have median earnings of $91,810. This data underscores the significant economic benefits of obtaining a high school diploma, college degree, or higher education credential.

Programs focused on upskilling and educational attainment, particularly for residents with lower education levels, may help bridge the gap between workforce skills and employment opportunities. Investments in technical training, certifications, and career pathways in growing industries and industries with a labor shortage could improve job access and economic outcomes for the workforce.

Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan.

The Consolidated Plan goals are intended to improve the lives of households with low to moderate incomes. Strengthening the workforce and labor market can create more jobs and higher wages, reducing financial strain on residents with lower incomes. Several areas of the city show a need for emphasis on workforce training initiatives, based on employment and income data.

The Economic Development Strategic Plan establishes workforce training initiatives, such as improving linkages to workforce development resources and establishing a “showcase” workforce development program focused on construction and related industries. This initiative seeks to provide pathways to sustainable employment and develop critical skill sets necessary for Carson’s long-term economic prosperity.

A key workforce initiative in Carson is the Carson One-Stop Career Center, affiliated with the South Bay Workforce Investment Board (SBWIB). The center serves as a comprehensive resource for both employers and job seekers, offering customized services to support hiring, workforce development, and training needs. Services are frequently customized to meet specific business and industry employment requirements and include job information, training and job placement services, labor market information, career workshops, job and career placement assistance, and individualized assessments.

The Rapid Response Program, also offered through the Carson Career Center and SBWIB, provides critical support to employees affected by layoffs or business closures. This program offers assistance with job search services, unemployment benefits, medical insurance referrals,

Consolidated Plan CARSON 92
2025-2029
and access to community resources. In some cases, Rapid Response may also help prevent layoffs by working directly with businesses to identify potential solutions.

Additionally, workforce training is incentivized through the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC), a federal program that encourages businesses to hire individuals from targeted populations, including veterans, ex-felons, SSI recipients, and high-risk youth. Employers may also benefit from cash reimbursements through On-the-Job Training (OJT) programs, which cover up to 50 percent of an employee's salary during their training period. These initiatives help bridge skill gaps and connect workers with sustainable career opportunities.

By expanding training, career development, and employer incentives, these workforce programs align with the Consolidated Plan’s goals by reducing financial hardship, increasing employment stability, and promoting long-term economic growth in Carson.

Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)?
No.

If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth.

Not applicable.

Discussion

Please see above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 93
2025-2029
MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion
Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration")

As stated previously, the four major housing problems recognized by HUD are as follows:

• Substandard Housing Unit – Lacks Complete Kitchen Facilities. A complete kitchen consists of a sink with running water, a stove or range, and a refrigerator. • S ubstandard Housing Unit – Lacks Complete Plumbing Facilities: Complete plumbing consists of hot and cold running water, a flush toilet, and a bathtub or shower. • C ost Burdened Household: Monthly housing costs exceed 30 percent of monthly income. A household is severely cost burdened if their monthly housing costs exceed 50 percent of their monthly income. Note that, for renters, housing costs include contract rent and utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payments, utilities, association fees, insurance, and real estate taxes.
• O
vercrowded Household: More than one person per room. Severe overcrowding is more than 1.5 persons per room.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 94
2025-2029
Figure MA-50.01 is a map indicating census tracts with a concentration of low-income households with any of the four severe housing problems.

Figure MA-50.01: Percentage of Low-Income Households with Any of the Four Severe Housing Problems

Data Source: 2023 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CPD Maps

Consolidated Plan CARSON 95
2025-2029
Figure MA-50.02 indicates which census tracts have a concentration of cost-burdened households.

Figure MA-50.02: Percentage of Cost-Burdened Households by Census Tract

Data Source: 2023 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CPD Maps

Consolidated Plan CARSON 96
2025-2029
Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low-income families are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration")

A minority concentration is defined as a census tract whose proportion of a non-white population is at least 20 percentage points higher than the area as a whole, according to HUD’s Rental Assistance Determination Minority Concentration Analysis Tool. Based on this definition, most of the city is considered a minority concentration area. Figure MA-50.03 below shows a map of the city using HUD’s Minority Concentration Analysis Tool.

Figure MA-50.03: Minority Concentration Map

Data Source: 2020 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development RAD Minority Concentration Analysis Tool

What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods? In Carson, low- and moderate-income and minority-concentrated areas are spread throughout the region. As shown in Figure MA-50.03, most of the city is considered a minority concentration area. The previous Market Analysis sections detail the characteristics of the market in Carson.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 97
2025-2029

Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods?

These areas are adjacent to many community assets, including schools and parks, as well as grocery stores, and service providers.

Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas?

Areas with high concentrations of low-income households may present an opportunity for investment through services and public facility funding. The City will continue collaborating with partner agencies to ensure cost-effective delivery of services and programs. Federal funding will be directed to those most in need.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 98
2025-2029
MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2)

Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households, including low- and moderate-income households and neighborhoods.

HUD guidelines require all Consolidated Plans to include a discussion on the broadband needs of the jurisdiction and the prevalence of the digital divide, defined as the gap between households with access to computers and internet on a regular basis and those who do not. In preparing the Consolidated Plan, the City used data from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to estimate the number of households with and without internet access.

The internet is an essential communications and information tool, enabling users to benefit from the growing interconnectedness of business, education, commerce, and daily activity.

Reliable internet access is increasingly recognized as a necessity for thriving in today’s economic environment. Communities without broadband access face significant challenges in keeping pace with the rest of the country, as limited connectivity hinders their residents’ ability to access educational and entrepreneurial opportunities online. The issue is particularly pronounced in low to moderate-income areas, where economic opportunities are already limited. Research indicates a strong correlation between expanded high-speed internet access and improved educational and employment prospects, especially in small cities and rural communities.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 99
2025-2029
Figure MA-60.01 shows broadband access across Carson, where broadband is defined as service with download speeds of 25 megabits per second (Mbps) and upload speeds of 3 Mbps (25/3 Mbps). As shown in the map, significant gaps in broadband coverage are minimal.

Figure MA-60.01: Map of Broadband Access

Data Source: California Interactive Broadband Map (data as of December 31, 2021)

In March 2024, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) raised their benchmark for high-speed fixed broadband from 25/3 Mbps to download speeds of 100 Mbps and upload

Consolidated Plan CARSON 100
2025-2029
speeds of 20 Mbps (100/20 Mbps). Figure MA-60.02 shows that 100 percent of units in Carson have access to high-speed fixed broadband with speeds of at least 100/20 Mbps.

Figure MA-60.02: Units with Fixed Broadband Access in Carson

Data Source: Federal Communications Commission (data as of June 30, 2024)

Consolidated Plan CARSON 101
2025-2029
Figure MA-60.03 shows the top 10 fixed broadband providers in Carson and the percentage of units served by each provider.

Figure MA-60.03: Top 10 Fixed Broadband Providers in Carson

Data Source: Federal Communications Commission (data as of June 30, 2024)

Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction.

As shown in Figure MA-60.03, multiple broadband providers serve Carson. Having a variety of broadband internet providers fosters competition, which often leads to improved service quality, lower prices, and greater innovation in technology. It gives consumers more choices, enabling them to select a provider that best meets their needs in terms of speed, reliability, and cost. Multiple providers can also increase network resilience, as alternative options ensure connectivity in case of service disruptions. This competitive landscape drives providers to continually enhance their offerings, ultimately benefiting both residential and business users with better overall internet services.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 102
2025-2029
MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3)

Describe the jurisdiction’s increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change.

On [INSERT DATE], the City of Carson adopted the 2024 Hazard Mitigation Plan, which is designed to function as a roadmap for the coordination and execution of hazard mitigation policies and initiatives within the city. It describes the characteristics of hazards which threaten the community, as well as mitigation goals, strategies, and associated actions to aid the City and its community in reducing risks and minimizing damages by taking proactive steps before disaster strikes.

The Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies 17 hazards, which are shown in Table MA-65.01 below.

Table MA-65.01: Hazard Profile Descriptions
# Hazard Description
1 Drought/Water
Shortage
A drought is a deficiency of precipitation over an extended period resulting in a water shortage. (FEMA, NRI).
2 Earthquake An earthquake is a shaking of the earth's surface by energy waves emitted by slowly moving tectonic plates overcoming friction with one another underneath the earth's surface (FEMA, NRI).
3 Extreme Heat Extreme heat is a period of abnormally and uncomfortably hot and unusually humid weather typically lasting two or more days with temperatures outside the historical averages for a given area. Extreme heat is responsible for the highest number of annual deaths among all weather-related hazards (FEMA, NRI).
4 Extreme Winder
Weather (Cold)
Extreme cold is a rapid fall in temperature within 24 hours and extreme low temperatures for an extended period (FEMA, NRI). 5 Flood A flood occurs when the existing channel of a stream, river, canyon, or other watercourse cannot contain excess runoff from rainfall or snowmelt, resulting in overflow onto adjacent lands. In coastal areas, flooding may occur when high winds or tides result in a surge of seawater into areas that are above the normal high tide line. 6 Hail Hail is a form of precipitation that occurs during thunderstorms when raindrops, in extremely cold areas of the atmosphere, freeze into balls of ice before falling towards the earth's surface (FEMA, NRI).

Consolidated Plan CARSON 103
2025-2029
# Hazard Description
7 High Wind High Wind consists of damaging winds, often originating from thunderstorms, that are classified as exceeding 58 mph (FEMA, NRI). 8 Hurricane A hurricane is a tropical cyclone or localized, low-pressure weather system that has organized thunderstorms but no front (a boundary separating two air masses of different densities) and maximum sustained winds of at least 74 mph (FEMA, NRI).
9 Industrial
Pollution/Chemical
Release
When these chemicals are released into the environment leads to different forms of pollution like air pollution, water pollution, and land pollution. A chemical release is the discharge or release of hazardous liquids, gases, or solids. It can occur due to an accident, a failure or an attack involving hazardous products (EPA).
10 Landslide/Mudflow A landslide is the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope (FEMA, NRI).
11 Land
subsidence/Karst
Land subsidence is a gradual settling or sudden sinking of the Earth's surface due to removal or displacement of subsurface earth materials.

Karst is a type of landscape where the dissolving of the bedrock has created sinkholes, sinking streams, caves, springs, and other characteristic features (USGS).
12 Pandemic A pandemic is a global outbreak of disease that occurs when a new virus emerges in the human population, spreading easily in a sustained manner, and causing serious illness. An epidemic describes a smaller-scale infectious outbreak, within a region or population, that emerges at a disproportional rate. Infectious disease outbreaks may be widely dispersed geographically, impact large numbers of the population, and could arrive in waves lasting several months at a time (CDC).
13 Severe Storm/
Thunderstorm
/Lightening
Severe storms refer to any dangerous meteorological phenomena with the potential to cause damage, serious social disruption, or loss of human life such as thunderstorms and lightning. NOAA classifies a thunderstorm as a storm with lightning and thunder produced by cumulonimbus clouds, usually producing gusty winds, heavy rain, and sometimes hail. Thunderstorms are usually short in duration but can cause significant damage. Lightening is an electrical discharge that results from the built of positive and negative charges within a thunderstorm. When the buildup becomes strong enough, lightning

Consolidated Plan CARSON 104
2025-2029
# Hazard Description
appears as a “bolt.” This flash of light usually occurs within the clouds or between the clouds and the ground. (NWS).
14 Tornado A tornado is a narrow, violently rotating column of air that extends from the base of a thunderstorm to the ground and is visible only if it forms a condensation funnel made up of water droplets, dust, and debris (FEMA, NRI).
15 Tsunami and Seiche A tsunami is a wave or series of waves generated by an Earthquake, Landslide, volcanic eruption, or even a large meteor hitting the ocean and causing a rise or mounding of water at the ocean surface. A tsunami can travel across an open ocean at about 500 mph and slow down to about 30 mph as it approaches land, causing it to grow significantly in height.

A seiche is a standing wave oscillating in a body of water. Wind and atmospheric pressure can contribute to seiche events. They are usually limited to partially or fully enclosed basins (NOAA). 16 Urban Fire Urban fires are classified as “uncontrolled burning in a residence or building from natural, human or technical causes”. These fires have the potential to spread to adjoining structures. Local city and county fire departments are tasked with the response and control of urban fires.
17 Wildfire A wildfire is an unplanned fire burning in natural or wildland areas such as forests, shrub lands, grasslands, or prairies (FEMA, NRI).

Data Source: 2024 City of Carson Hazard Mitigation Plan

Describe the vulnerability to these risks of housing occupied by low- and moderate-income households based on an analysis of data, findings, and methods.

Emergencies and disasters often highlight and exacerbate existing societal inequities, affecting groups based on socioeconomic status, race, age, disability, and other social factors. These events disproportionately impact certain populations, creating additional challenges in the preparation, response, and recovery phases. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic shed light on pre-existing disparities, such as limited healthcare access, leading to higher rates of hospitalizations and mortality among vulnerable groups. It is essential to recognize and understand these community-specific limitations and barriers to strive for equitable preparedness, mitigation, and response strategies for future incidents.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 105
2025-2029

To aid in this, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a comprehensive tool designed for emergency management planners and practitioners at state, local, and tribal levels. The SVI helps identify communities with high social vulnerability, potentially facing greater impacts during emergencies and disasters. Figure MA-65.01 below shows the breakdown of the overall SVI Score in the City of Carson.

Figure MA-65.01: City of Carson Overall SVI

Data Source: 2024 City of Carson Hazard Mitigation Plan

Consolidated Plan CARSON 106
2025-2029
Strategic Plan
SP-05 Overview

Strategic Plan Overview

The City’s Strategic Plan proposes eligible projects and activities to meet the priorities described in the Consolidated Plan. Ultimately, the Strategic Plan will help achieve the City's Consolidated Plan goals by guiding investments in Carson’s communities and households with low to moderate incomes.

The Strategic Plan includes the following sections:

• SP-10 Geographic Priorities
• SP-25 Priority Needs
• SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions
• SP-35 Anticipated Resources
• SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure
• SP-45 Goals Summary
• SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement
• SP-55 Barriers to Affordable Housing
• SP-60 Homelessness Strategy
• SP-65 Lead-Based Paint Hazards
• SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy
• SP-80 Monitoring

The four priorities for the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan cycle are as follows:

These goals, and the funded activities meant to achieve them, align with HUD's approaches to developing viable communities: (1) providing decent housing; (2) providing a suitable living environment; and (3) expanding economic opportunity.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 107
2025-2029
SP-10 Geographic Priorities – 91.215 (a)(1)

Geographic Area

Not applicable. Please see the discussion below.

Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA)

The City generally distributes funds on a project-by-project basis and does not distribute funds geographically, with the exception of the Commercial Façade/Rehabilitation program and selected public facility/infrastructure projects.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 108
2025-2029
SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2)
Priority Needs
Table SP-25.01: Priority Needs
Priority 1 Affordable Housing
Priority Level High
Description Assist in increasing and preserving access to high-quality affordable housing by investing in property rehabilitation.

Population Extremely Low-Income
Low-Income
Moderate-Income
Large Families
Families with Children
Elderly
Target Area Citywide
Associated
Goals
Expand Affordable Housing Options
Maintain and promote neighborhood preservation
Promote Community Development Programs
Basis for
Relative
Priority
Affordable housing and neighborhood preservation have been identified as a priority based on local housing data and input from the community and stakeholders.

Priority 2 Priority services for individuals with special needs and households with low to moderate incomes
Priority Level High
Description Expand essential community services for vulnerable populations.

Numerous special needs populations in the City are in need. These households have a variety of housing and service needs and continue to be a high priority within the City. These include the elderly, youth, persons with substance abuse problems, persons with disabilities, and victims of domestic violence. This also includes low-income households in need of public services.

Population Extremely Low-Income
Low-Income
Moderate-Income
Large Families
Families with Children
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Persons with Mental Disabilities

Consolidated Plan CARSON 109
2025-2029
Persons with Physical Disabilities
Persons with Developmental Disabilities
Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions
Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families
Victims of Domestic Violence
Non-housing Community Development
Target Area Citywide
Associated
Goals
Support public services
Promote Community Development Programs
Basis for
Relative
Priority
Community Services has been identified as a priority based on local housing data and input from the community and stakeholders.

Priority 3 Fair housing services
Priority Level High
Description Broaden fair housing education by raising awareness of rights, fostering inclusivity, and eliminating barriers to access.

Population Extremely Low-Income
Low-Income
Moderate-Income
Large Families
Families with Children
Elderly
Target Area Citywide
Associated
Goals
Expand Affordable Housing Options
Promote Community Development Programs
Basis for
Relative
Priority
Fair housing services are mandated by CDBG regulations and are made available to residents citywide. Additionally, as the housing landscape evolves with new rental laws and protections, the City remains committed to keeping Carson's renters and landlords well-informed.

Narrative (Optional)
Priority needs for Carson’s 2025 -2029 Consolidated Plan were identified through extensive housing and economic data, along with input from community and stakeholder meetings, stakeholder and resident surveys, and public hearings. These priority needs are integrated into the goals of this Consolidated Plan and will be addressed systematically through a series of project actions over the next five years. Program and project funding is allocated annually through a competitive application process, based on eligibility and available resources.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 110
2025-2029
SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions – 91.215 (b)

Table SP-30.01: Influence of Market Conditions
Affordable Housing Type Market Characteristics that will influence the use of funds available for housing type
Tenant Based Rental Assistance
(TBRA)
The City does not receive or use TBRA funds.

TBRA for Non-Homeless Special
Needs
The City does not receive or use TBRA funds.

New Unit Production The production of new housing units is influenced by several market conditions, including the cost of land, the cost of construction, and prevailing interest rates. The cost of land and labor act as major barriers to developing any type of new construction in the City with the limited amount of funds available.

Rehabilitation Rehabilitation activities can be influenced by the cost of materials and labor. Home rehabilitation can provide an opportunity for households to maintain safe, decent, affordable housing without the cost of acquisition or production. This may help the City to maintain the availability of units that are affordable to households at a variety of income levels.

Acquisition, including preservation Rising housing costs will limit the availability of funds to be used for acquisition due to the high cost of purchasing properties.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 111
2025-2029
SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2)

Introduction

The table that follows depicts the CDBG resources that the City of Carson is expected to have during the 2025 to 2029 Program Years. Anticipated funding levels for the CDBG program have been difficult to predict. Over the past five program years, the City’s CDBG funding has ranged from as much as $789,832 in PY 2020 to as little as $684,225 in PY 2024. Based on that five-year downward trend, the City is anticipating only $660,108 for PY 2025.

Table SP-35.01: Anticipated Resources
Program Source of
Funds
Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount
Available
Remainder
of ConPlan
$
Narrative Description
Annual
Allocation: $
Program
Income: $
Prior Year
Resources:
$
Total:
$
CDBG Public -
Federal
Acquisition,
Administration and
Planning, Economic
Development,
Housing,
Public
Improvements,
Public Services
$660,108 [INSERT
AMOUNT]
[INSERT
AMOUNT]
[INSERT
AMOUNT]
[INSERT
AMOUNT]
It is estimated that the City
will receive a CDBG
allocation of approximately
$3,300,540 over the five
years of the Consolidated
Plan based on past and
current funding.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 112
2025-2029
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied

While the CDBG program does not require matching funds, it serves as a critical tool for leveraging additional resources from private, local, state, and federal sources to expand the impact of funded activities. CDBG funds can be used strategically to attract and complement other investments, allowing for a more comprehensive approach to addressing community needs.

The City may pursue partnerships with state and local agencies, nonprofit organizations, and private sector stakeholders to maximize funding opportunities and provide sustainable public services, infrastructure improvements, and economic development programs.

If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan

The City of Carson recognizes the importance of leveraging public land to address housing and community needs and regularly reviews its real estate portfolio to assess whether properties are being utilized to their fullest potential. By evaluating its assets in alignment with housing and service priorities outlined in the Consolidated Plan, the City can create opportunities to support low- and moderate-income households, address homelessness, and expand access to essential services. In collaboration with local partners, the City will continue to explore publicly owned land as a resource to increase the supply of affordable housing and support broader community development goals.

Discussion

Please see above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 113
2025-2029
SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure – 91.215(k)

Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its consolidated plan including private industry, non-profit organizations, and public institutions.

Table SP-40.01: Institutional Delivery Structure
Responsible Entity Responsible Entity
Type
Role Geographic Area
Served
City of Carson Government Lead Agency – CDBG
Administrator
Jurisdiction
Housing Authority of the
County of Los Angeles
(HACoLA)
Public Housing
Authority
PHA Region
Los Angeles Homeless
Services Authority
(LAHSA)
Continuum of Care CoC Region

Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System

The institutional delivery system in Carson benefits from strong interdepartmental communication and collaboration. City staff work closely with various departments, community organizations, and agencies that assist low-income individuals and families to establish priorities and effectively allocate resources. While only a few entities have formal roles in administering HUD’s entitlement programs, the City, as the lead CDBG agency, coordinates efforts with a diverse range of stakeholders, including government agencies, businesses, nonprofit organizations, service providers, and sub-recipients.

A key strength of the delivery system is the ongoing communication and coordination among these entities, ensuring that programs align with community needs and that resources are maximized. However, the most significant gap in the system remains the limited availability of funding. The level of need in the City far exceeds available resources, making it difficult to fund all high-priority projects. As a result, some critical initiatives may experience delays while the City continues to seek additional funding sources to expand its capacity to meet community needs.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 114
2025-2029
Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services

Table SP-40.02: Homelessness Prevention Services Summary Homelessness Prevention
Services
Available in the
Community
Targeted to
Homeless
Targeted to People
with HIV
Homelessness Prevention Services
Counseling/Advocacy X X X
Legal Assistance X X
Mortgage Assistance
Rental Assistance X X
Utilities Assistance X X
Street Outreach Services
Law Enforcement X X
Mobile Clinics X
Other Street Outreach Services X X
Supportive Services
Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X
Child Care
Education X X
Employment and Employment
Training
X X
Healthcare X X

HIV/AIDS X X
Life Skills X X
Mental Health Counseling X X
Transportation X X
Other
Other

Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth)

The City of Carson’s service delivery system for addressing homelessness is built on collaboration with local and regional service providers to ensure individuals and families experiencing homelessness receive the necessary support, shelter, and housing opportunities.

Through partnerships with local agencies, the City connects chronically homeless individuals,

Consolidated Plan CARSON 115
2025-2029
families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth to emergency shelter, transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, and essential supportive services.

Additionally, Carson coordinates with the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), which plays a critical role in regional homeless response efforts, including data collection, resource allocation, and strategic planning. By aligning local efforts with broader regional initiatives, the City ensures a comprehensive and coordinated approach to addressing homelessness.

Through these efforts, Carson can leverage expertise, funding, and resources to create a more effective service delivery system that prioritizes long-term stability and self-sufficiency for those experiencing homelessness.

Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above

The City of Carson relies on a network of experienced agencies to deliver services to special needs populations and individuals experiencing homelessness. These organizations have a long history of providing critical support, including shelter, case management, mental health services, meals, and housing assistance. A major strength of the service delivery system is the collaboration between the City and regional partners, which allows for a more comprehensive response to the diverse needs of the population. Many service providers have established trust within the community, enabling them to effectively connect individuals to available resources.

Additionally, the City’s participation in regional initiatives, such as those led by LAHSA, strengthens access to data-driven strategies, funding opportunities, and best practices in homelessness prevention and intervention.

However, gaps remain in the service delivery system. The demand for services continues to exceed available resources, particularly as the population in need grows. Additional funding is needed to expand support for the growing population, along with improved coordination among service providers to enhance efficiency and impact.

Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs

The City will continue collaborating with nearby jurisdictions, nonprofit and faith-based organizations, and LAHSA to coordinate resources and develop strategies to address service

Consolidated Plan CARSON 116
2025-2029
gaps and priority needs. With a strong support structure in place, the City is confident in its ability to tackle the key priorities outlined in this Consolidated Plan.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 117
2025-2029
SP-45 Goals Summary – 91.215(a)(4)
Goals Summary Information

Table SP-45.01: Goals Summary

Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
Expand Affordable
Housing Options
2025 2029 Affordable Housing Citywide Decent and affordable housing; neighborhood
preservation
CDBG:
$2,642,295

X Households Assisted
Deliver Community
Services

2025 2029 Non-Homeless
Special Needs
Citywide Priority services for special
needs and LMI households
CDBG:
$469,760

X Persons Assisted
Provide Fair Housing
Services

2025 2029 Non-Homeless
Special Needs
Citywide Fair housing CDBG:
$140,000

X Persons Assisted

Consolidated Plan CARSON 118
2025-2029
Table SP-45.02: Goal Descriptions
Goal Name Goal Description
Expand Affordable Housing Options Assist in increasing and preserving access to high-quality affordable housing by investing in property rehabilitation.

Deliver Community Services

Expand essential community services for vulnerable populations, including seniors, youth, and individuals with special needs.

Provide needed public services within the City of Carson using CDBG resources not to exceed the 15% annual expenditure limit.

Support the CDBG program through CDBG administration and fair housing activities.

Provide Fair Housing Services Broaden fair housing education by raising awareness of rights, fostering inclusivity, and eliminating barriers to access.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 119
2025-2029
Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2)

The City estimates it will help at least 80 low- and moderate-income households access affordable housing over the course of the five year Consolidated Plan.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 120
2025-2029
SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement – 91.215(c) Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section 504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement)

The City of Carson does not own or operate any public housing.

Activities to Increase Resident Involvements

Not applicable.

Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part 902?

The public housing agency operating in Carson is the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles (HACoLA), a division of the Los Angeles Community Development Authority (LACDA).

HACoLA is not designated as troubled.

Plan to remove the ‘troubled’ designation

Not applicable.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 121
2025-2029
SP-55 Barriers to affordable housing – 91.215(h)

Barriers to Affordable Housing

Strategy to Remove or Ameliorate the Barriers to Affordable Housing

The City’s 2020 2020 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice outlined the below goals to address fair housing issues and impediments.

Table SP-55.01: Goals to Address Fair Housing Issues/Impediments

Fair Housing Goal Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice /
Contributing Factors
Fair Housing Issue Recommended Actions
Review zoning and
municipal codes for
barriers to housing
choice
High levels of
segregation,
Discriminatory patterns
in lending
Segregation Review zoning for areas with
restrictions to housing
development, including
minimum lot requirements;
make appropriate
amendments every year for
the next five (5) years.

Record activities annually.

Increase availability of
accessible housing
Insufficient accessible
affordable housing
Disability and
Access
Review development
standards for accessible
housing and inclusionary
policies for accessible
housing units; continue

Consolidated Plan CARSON 122
2025-2029

Fair Housing Goal Impediments to Fair
Housing Choice /
Contributing Factors
Fair Housing Issue Recommended Actions
recommending appropriate
amendments over the next
five (5) years. Record
activities annually.

Promote housing
opportunities in high
opportunity areas
Insufficient accessible
affordable housing
Disproportionate
Housing Need
Continue to use CDBG and
HOME funds to fund housing
rehabilitation for
homeowner and rental
housing option: 150
residential housing units
over five (5) years.

Promote community
and service provider
knowledge of
fair housing
Lack of fair housing
Infrastructure,
Insufficient fair housing
Education,
Insufficient
understanding of credit
Fair Housing
Enforcement and
Outreach
Continue to promote fair
housing education through
annual or biannual
workshops. Maintain
records of activities annually.

Ensure that fair housing
education materials are
available in the Spanish
language. Maintain records
of activities annually.

Promote annual outreach
and education related to
credit for prospective
homebuyers. Maintain
records of activities annually.

Partner with community
agencies to provide financial
literacy classes for
prospective homebuyers on
an annual basis. Maintain
records of activities annually.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 123
2025-2029
SP-60 Homelessness Strategy – 91.215(d)

Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs

PATH's outreach teams engage directly with unsheltered individuals, building trusting relationships to assess their specific needs and connect them to essential services. These services include housing assistance, interim housing, veterans' services, mental health care, medical services, employment support, and benefits enrollment. By providing comprehensive, person-centered support, PATH aims to help individuals transition from homelessness to stable housing and improved well-being.

Through this coordinated approach, the City and its partners provide a comprehensive and person-centered response to homelessness, ensuring that individuals receive the support needed to transition into stable housing and improve their overall quality of life.

Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless persons

At present, there are no emergency shelters or transitional housing facilities located in the City of Carson. Since there is an obvious need for such facilities, the City is exploring two avenues: a) outreach to a provider or providers of emergency shelters and/or transitional housing facilities who may be interested in operating such facilities within the city; or b) becoming such a provider itself. The City recently prepared and adopted amendments to its Zoning Code the accomplished the following:

• Permitting emergency shelters by tight in the ML (Manufacturing Light) and MH (Manufacturing Heavy) zones, and providing for development and operational standards;
• Identifying transitional and supportive housing as a residential use and permitting it in all residential zones, subject only to those standards /regulations that apply to other residential uses of the same type in the same zone; and • Permitting single-room occupancy (SRO) units in at least one zone.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 124
2025-2029
These changes will enable to City to monitor the inventory of sites appropriate to accommodate emergency, transitional, and supportive housing facilities and work with appropriate organizations to ensure that the needs of the homeless and extremely low income households are met.

As a result of participation in the Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative, City staff have become aware of SB (Senate Bill) 2, a State law requiring each city or county to identify at least one zone where emergency shelters are permitted by right and treating transitional and supportive housing as residential uses of property, subject only to restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone, so one of the tasks ahead for the Carson Homelessness Task Force would be to monitor the existing planning and zoning regulations to ensure the City’s compliance with SB 2.

Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again

The Time-Limited Subsidy Programs within the Permanent Housing Department of LAHSA play a critical role in helping individuals and families experiencing homelessness transition to permanent housing. These programs include Rapid Re-Housing, Recovery Re-Housing, and Shallow Subsidy/Street to Subsidy, all of which provide temporary financial assistance and housing support to help households secure stable housing quickly.

Time-Limited Subsidies are a key component of the LA Continuum of Care's permanent housing portfolio, designed to assist individuals and families who do not require deeper, long-term support, such as permanent supportive housing. These programs operate under a Housing First approach, meaning they serve individuals regardless of housing barriers and incorporate trauma-informed care and harm reduction strategies to ensure accessibility and effectiveness.

By providing flexible, short-term assistance, these programs help prevent returns to homelessness and support individuals in maintaining stable housing after their initial placement.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 125
2025-2029
Help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families who are likely to become homeless after being discharged from a publicly funded institution or system of care, or who are receiving assistance from public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education or youth needs

One of the local social service providers that has received CDBG public service funds in the past, the Office of Samoan Affairs, has incorporated a program of services to the homeless and persons at risk of becoming homeless (primarily counseling, referral to appropriate agencies, and assistance in applying for and obtaining benefits) into its multifaceted portfolio of services.

This would appear to be a prime candidate for subsequent years’ funding should the agency seek to pursue it.

Through the City’s membership in the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG), the City is participating in SBCCOG’s program of outreach to the local homeless community and referral to services. SBCCOG contracts with People Assisting the Homeless (PATH), a statewide network of agencies that provides services to the homeless, to coordinate the effort.

Additionally, the City entered into its own contract with PATH (using funding other than CDBG) for additional outreach services within Carson.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 126
2025-2029
SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards – 91.215(i)

Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards

Lead-based paint (LBP) regulations affect a variety of housing and community-based programs.

The process for identifying and resolving LBP issues varies depending upon the amount of assistance and the type of program affected. The most common actions that need to be taken are:
• Lead Hazard Evaluation – A risk assessment, paint testing or a combination of these to determine the presence of LBP hazards or LBP in properties built prior to 1978. • Lead Hazard Reduction – Activities designed to reduce or eliminate exposure to LBP hazards through methods including interim controls, standard treatments, or abatement.
• Clearance – An activity conducted following LBP hazard reduction activities to determine that the hazard reduction activities are complete.

As shown in Table MA-20.05, 82 percent of owner-occupied units and 74 percent of renter- occupied units in Carson were built before 1980, making them potential sources of lead-based paint exposure, as residential use of LBP was banned in 1978. Among these older units, 11 percent of owner-occupied units and 15 percent of renter-occupied units have children present in the home, a population particularly vulnerable to lead poisoning.

How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards?

The actions listed above support efforts to mitigate lead poisoning and hazards by facilitating access to safer housing and reducing exposure risks for vulnerable populations. Lead-based paint (LBP) exposure is a significant health concern, particularly for young children, as it can lead to serious physical and cognitive health issues. Again, in Carson, 11 percent of owner- occupied and 15 percent of renter-occupied housing units built before 1980 have children present, putting them at higher risk of lead exposure.

How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures?

Consolidated Plan CARSON 127
2025-2029
• Considering annual programs and materials that educate residents on the health dangers of lead-based paint and encourage the screening of children for elevated blood levels;
• Including lead-based paint hazard reduction as an eligible activity in rehabilitation programs;
• Reviewing current housing and rehabilitation cases to ensure that lead-based paint hazard reduction is incorporated; and
• Promoting awareness and elimination of lead-based paint hazards among other housing providers, including local non-profit housing developers.

The City’s efforts to conform to (24 CER) Section 570.608 regarding the notification, inspection, testing, and abatement procedures concerning lead-based paint as required in the CDBG certifications have most recently included the engagement of a consultant to conduct lead hazard inspections/evaluations, paint testing, risk assessments, and final clearance inspections.

All properties served by the City’s housing rehabilitation programs undergo an initial lead hazard assessment, with subsequent actions to be determined according to the results of that assessment.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 128
2025-2029
SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy – 91.215(j)
Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty-Level Families

Reducing poverty and improving economic stability for individuals and families requires a comprehensive, multifaceted approach that integrates affordable housing, economic development, education, and workforce opportunities. The City of Carson is committed to implementing strategies that address both the immediate needs of low-income households and the long-term economic opportunities that can lift families out of poverty.

To alleviate financial burdens, the City will allocate funding to help reduce housing costs by assisting with home repairs, preserving existing affordable housing, and ensuring that residents have access to stable and safe living conditions. These efforts aim to prevent displacement and promote housing stability, which are essential to economic mobility.

A strong economic development strategy is also key to poverty reduction. Elevating income levels for individuals and families living in poverty requires a multifaceted approach that includes affordable housing, livable communities, education, and job creation.

To maximize impact, the City will allocate funding to help in reducing housing costs can help lift families out of poverty rather than simply providing temporary relief. The City aims to create and preserve both affordable rental housing and homeownership opportunities to benefit as many residents as possible.

Strengthening the City’s economic base is another critical strategy for poverty reduction. The City will implement coordinated economic development efforts focused on job creation, business retention, expansion, and attraction. Additionally, individuals and families will be supported through job training, counseling, education, and direct connections to employment opportunities. These efforts will be carried out in collaboration with public and private organizations that provide education and workforce development programs., ensuring that local businesses can thrive and provide sustainable employment opportunities. Through partnerships with workforce development agencies and educational institutions, individuals and families will have access to job training, career counseling, and education programs that enhance skill development and increase access to higher-paying jobs.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 129
2025-2029
How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan

Carson’s anti-poverty strategy is closely aligned with the goals and objectives of the overall affordable housing plan. These goals include reducing poverty, creating new and affordable housing, developing and promoting services for at-risk populations, expanding job training, and providing public and social services.

The City plans to allocate federal funding to support affordable housing initiatives, strengthen neighborhoods, and expand essential community resources. This includes partnering with public and private organizations to provide a continuum of services that address housing, job training, and supportive programs for low- and moderate-income households. By coordinating housing policies with economic development and social services, the City ensures a comprehensive approach to poverty reduction, helping residents achieve long-term financial stability and self-sufficiency while strengthening the overall community.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 130
2025-2029
SP-80 Monitoring – 91.230

Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements

T
he City’s Community Development Department is responsible for ensuring that the receipt and expenditure of HUD funds complies with program requirements through the monitoring of program performance. Careful evaluation of the housing and public service delivery system can be the most effective tool in detecting gaps and making appropriate modifications. Carson will follow monitoring procedures identified in the City’s Subrecipient Monitoring Plan. Other procedures will include in-h
ouse review of progress reports and expenditures, and on-s ite visits
to ensure compliance with federal regulations. The monitoring system will encourage uniform reporting to achieve consistent information on beneficiaries. Monitoring will also aim at resolving any program or accounting findings or other problems that may keep an organization from meeting its contractual obligations. Technical assistance will be provided where necessary.

F
urthermore, project and financial data on CDBG-fu
nded activities will be maintained using
HUD’s Integrated Disbursement Information System (IDIS). Use of this system allows HUD staff easy access to local data for review and progress evaluation.

M
onitoring of Housing and Community Development Projects

Project Selection: Prior to selection of an activity for funding, the prospective subrecipient must submit an application describing the program for which it is seeking funding, the amount of funding requested, and the program’s goals/outcomes. The proposed programs are reviewed by staff to determine that they are eligible activities for CDBG funding and meet Consolidated Plan goals and objectives.

Contract Management: Each CDBG subrecipient has a written agreement with the City. The agreement specifies the program requirements, the program activity, funding amount, and the expected performance outcomes. During the program year, CDBG subrecipients are required to provide quarterly invoices and reports to the City. The quarterly report provides information about the individuals assisted and the organization’s performance in meeting its goals and objectives as provided in the subrecipient agreement, which is based upon furthering the Consolidated Plan goals and objectives. On a quarterly basis, the City reviews the invoices and

Consolidated Plan CARSON 131
2025-2029
reports to ensure that the subrecipients are spending the funds in a timely manner and meeting their performance goals.

Monitoring Compliance: In addition to the quarterly review of expenditures and performance, the City performs annual monitoring of each subrecipient following the City’s CDBG Subrecipient Monitoring Guide. The guide details the City’s monitoring goals, procedures and standards. Each subrecipient receives a monitoring questionnaire and document request list with a response deadline. The questionnaire requests information about program elements and knowledge.

Fo
llowing a checklist, staff performs an analysis of each subrecipient. The analysis exposes any possible compliance or performance issues and identifies those agencies requiring more comprehensive monitoring. Based on responses to the questionnaire and other criteria, at least one
-thi
rd of the subrecipients will be selected for more comprehensive monitoring and an on- s
ite visit.

Dur
ing the monitoring visit, staff will review information to help determine if the organization has knowledge and understanding of the CDBG regulations, documentation of the clients served and income eligibility, proper internal controls, and back-u p documentation of charges
made to the CDBG program. Within 30 days of the visit, subrecipients will receive a monitoring letter summarizing areas of improvement, findings, and/or concerns. The letter will specify any corrective actions required and include specific recommendations for improvement. The subrecipient will be given a deadline to provide a written response describing how and when the agency will resolve any findings. If a subrecipient is unable to meet the goals necessary to further the City’s plan, then the organization will not have its funding renewed.

Audit: If the subrecipient expends more than $750,000 in federal funds during the fiscal year, it is required to perform a single audit and submit a copy to the City. The audit is reviewed, and any findings are noted for follow-up.

Affordable Housing Projects

Affordable housing projects supported with federal funds (such as the CDBG program) and subject to the Consolidated Plan are monitored on a regular basis to ensure compliance with occupancy and affordability requirements. The City will perform the following monitoring functions:
• Provide project owners with new income limits and rent limits; • Review documentation of tenant income and owner compliance with rent limits;

Consolidated Plan CARSON 132
2025-2029
• Review owner rent increase requests;
• Perform Housing Quality Standards inspection and Code Compliance checks on HOME- funded rental properties in accordance with HOME regulations; and • Notify owners of any non-compliance and the necessary actions to restore compliance.

Loans

Over the years, the City has loaned CDBG funds to property owners through various community development programs to support Consolidated Plan goals, such as housing rehabilitation, commercial façade improvement, and down payment assistance programs. All of the loans administered by the City, the City will complete annual monitoring of title, taxes and insurance.

If continued owner occupancy was a requirement of the loan, then the City will collect the necessary documentation, as well. For loans administered by the City’s loan servicer, the City will regularly review the loan servicer’s monitoring activities and follow up on delinquent accounts.

Program Monitoring

At least quarterly, the City’s Community Development staff will review CDBG expenditures for the various activities to ensure that spending deadlines and individual program objectives are being met. As progress is made on the programs, accomplishment information will be entered in IDIS.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 133
2025-2029
First Program Year (2025-26) Annual Action Plan
Expected Resources
AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.420(b), 91.220(c)(1,2)
Introduction

The table that follows depicts the CDBG resources that the City of Carson is expected to have during the 2025 Program Year. For purposes of this table, the City is projecting the same amount of funding annually over the remainder of the Consolidated Plan period. However, the City recognizes that continued CDBG funding is not guaranteed.

Table AP-15.01: Expected Resources
Program Source
of
Funds
Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount
Available
Remainder
of ConPlan
$
Narrative Description
Annual
Allocation: $
Program
Income: $
Prior Year
Resources:
$
Total:
$
CDBG Public -
Federal
Acquisition;
Admin and
Planning;
Economic
Development;
Housing Public
Improvements;
Public Services
$660,108 $552,940 $466,207 $1,679,255 $4,065,070

Consolidated Plan CARSON 134
2025-2029
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied

The City will utilize Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funds to support affordable housing initiatives, ensuring that CDBG-funded programs align with and enhance broader housing efforts. Additionally, the City may pursue partnerships with state and local agencies, nonprofit organizations, and private sector stakeholders to maximize funding opportunities and provide sustainable public services, infrastructure improvements, and economic development programs.

If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan

Discussion

Please see above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 135
2025-2029
Annual Goals and Objectives

AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e)

Table AP-20.01: Goals Summary Information

Sort
Order
Goal Name Start
Year
End
Year
Category Geographic
Area
Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
1 Expand Affordable
Housing Options
2025 2026 Affordable Housing Citywide Decent and
affordable housing;
neighborhood
preservation
CDBG: $ X Households Assisted
2 Deliver Community
Services
2025 2026 Non-Homeless
Special Needs
Citywide Priority services for
special needs and
LMI households
CDBG: $ X Persons Assisted
3 Provide Fair Housing
Services
2025 2026 Non-Homeless
Special Needs
Citywide Fair housing CDBG: $

X Persons Assisted

Consolidated Plan CARSON 136
2025-2029
Table AP-20.02: Goal Descriptions

Goal Name Goal Description
Expand Affordable Housing Options Assist in increasing and preserving access to high-quality affordable housing by investing in property rehabilitation.

Deliver Community Services

Expand essential community services for vulnerable populations, including seniors, youth, and individuals with special needs.

Provide needed public services within the City of Carson using CDBG resources not to exceed the 15% annual expenditure limit.

Support the CDBG program through CDBG administration and fair housing activities.

Provide Fair Housing Services Broaden fair housing education by raising awareness of rights, fostering inclusivity, and eliminating barriers to access.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 137
2025-2029
Projects
AP-35 Projects – 91.220(d)

Introduction

The City of Carson allocated its CDBG resources in a manner that addresses its identified housing and community development needs. The projects and programs selected for funding over the upcoming program year are further listed in Section AP-38 according to project number followed by the project’s name and needs that are addressed. Funding for each program is also identified in the Section AP-38.

The projects listed in this section and in Section AP-38 reflect the recommendations adopted by the City Council at its meeting on [INSERT DATE].

Projects

Table AP-35.01: Project Information
# Project Name
1 Neighborhood Pride Program
2 Fair Housing
3 Boys and Girls Clubs of Carson
4 Venice Family Clinic
5 Program Administration

Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs

The Department of Community Development considered all public comments submitted during the public hearing and will take into account additional feedback received during the public review and comment period. These allocation priorities were developed through the public participation process to ensure they align with the community’s most pressing needs. The projects selected reflect the recommendations adopted by the City Council at its meeting on [INSERT DATE], based on community input, local data, and strategic planning efforts.

The allocation of CDBG funding is closely tied to the City’s local objectives, focusing on areas where the greatest impact can be made. However, limited resource availability remains the

Consolidated Plan CARSON 138
2025-2029
biggest obstacle to fully addressing the needs of underserved populations. To maximize the effectiveness of available funds, the City has and will continue to collaborate with government agencies, nonprofits, businesses, and other stakeholders to coordinate service provision and enhance program delivery. Strengthening these partnerships will help bridge resource gaps, improve service accessibility, and ensure that CDBG funds are used efficiently to support Carson’s most vulnerable communities.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 139
2025-2029
AP-38 Project Summary
Table AP-38.01: Project Summary Information

1 Project Name Neighborhood Pride Program
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Expand Affordable Housing Options
Maintain and Promote Neighborhood Preservation
Needs Addressed Decent affordable housing
Neighborhood preservation
Funding CDBG: [INSERT AMOUNT]
Description The Neighborhood Pride Program (NPP) is designed to assist low- a nd moderate-income owners of single-family detached dwellings and mobile homes with the preservation of decent, safe, and sanitary housing. The NPP corrects hazardous structural conditions, makes improvements considered necessary to eliminate blight, promotes healthy, sustainable, and resource-efficient housing, improves disabled access, and corrects building and health and safety code violations. As such, the program addresses two of the major priority needs in the City's Five-Year Consolidated Plan; provide decent affordable housing; and maintain and promote neighborhood preservation. Program funds may be used to complete approved and required housing rehabilitation activities and to address lead-based paint hazards. Eligible items include roofing, driveway replacement, exterior painting, stucco work, correction of faulty plumbing and heating, replacement of deteriorated stairs, hazardous wiring repairs, and security lighting The NPP provides financial assistance in the form of loans or grants to eligible households whose income does not exceed 80% of area median income, adjusted for household size. The program provides grants of up to 30,000 for single-family detached dwellings, and up to $20,000 for mobile homes. For single-family homes, amounts over $30,000 up to $50,000 are eligible for a loan at 3% simple interest. A participating household may receive a loan or a grant, but not both. This allocation includes funding for inspection services related to the rehabilitation projects and for lead and asbestos testing and abatement services (both handled by contract).

Target Date 6/30/2026

Consolidated Plan CARSON 140
2025-2029
Estimate the number
and type of families
that will benefit from
the proposed
activities
The City estimates that this program will rehabilitate a minimum of 20 single-family units and mobile home units (20 low- and moderate- income households) during Program Year 2025.

Location Description All target areas are included, but this can take place anywhere in the city provided that the applicant meets the low- to moderate-income guidelines as this is a direct benefit activity.

Planned Activities None at this time. Applications are reviewed upon submittal. 2 Project Name Fair Housing
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Maintain and Promote Affordable Housing Deliver Community Services
Needs Addressed Decent affordable housing
Fair housing
Funding CDBG: [INSERT AMOUNT]
Description As part of its obligation to affirmatively further fair housing, the City of Carson offers a Fair Housing Services program, under an annual contract with the Los Angeles-based Housing Rights Center. This program is designed to combat discrimination in housing on the basis of race, color, national origin, handicap, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, creed, or any other protected category. Since 2014, the City has included fair housing services within its CDBG public services allocation, rather than its administration allocation. Presently, the Housing Rights Center provides fair housing workshops for property owners, management, and tenants, education, outreach, complaint handling, and enforcement in accordance with State and Federal civil/housing rights laws. HRC's program consists of the following components: Housing Discrimination Complaint Investigation. HRC investigates housing discrimination complaints brought under both State and Federal fair housing laws. A housing discrimination complaint can be investigated through testing, the gathering of witness statements, or through research surveys. HRC resolves cases in a number of ways including conciliation, litigation or referrals.

HRC's litigation department has been very successful at winning strong judgments and settlements for its clients. Fair Housing Education and Outreach. HRC has established an effective and comprehensive outreach and education program by continuously developing and

Consolidated Plan CARSON 141
2025-2029
distributing written materials that describe the applicable laws that protect against housing discrimination and ways to prevent housing injustices. Tenant and Landlord Counseling. HRC provides telephone and in-person counseling to both tenants and landlords regarding their respective rights and responsibilities under California law and local city ordinances. In addition to answering basic housing questions, counselors commonly cite specific civil codes that pertain to the client's matter and/or provide sample letters that discuss a particular issue. When a client's matter is outside the scope of HRC's services, HRC provides appropriate referral information. These referrals include, but are not limited to local housing authorities, health, and building and safety departments, legal assistance agencies, and other social service providers.

Target Date 6/30/2026
Estimate the number
and type of families
that will benefit from
the proposed
activities
It is estimated that Fair Housing services will be provided to a minimum of 45 low- and moderate-income households, both existing and prospective residents of Carson.

Location Description Services are provided on a citywide basis Planned Activities None at this time. Program activity is generated through referrals, walk-ins and individual contact by persons perceiving potential discrimination, and through testing.
3 Project Name Boys and Girls Clubs of Carson
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Deliver Community Services
Needs Addressed Services for special needs and LMI households Funding CDBG: [INSERT AMOUNT]
Description This activity will provide a variety of after-school development and educational support programming for youth.

Target Date 6/30/2026
Estimate the number
and type of families
that will benefit from
the proposed
activities
50 low- to moderate-income households
Location Description 21502 South Main Street, Carson, CA 90745

Consolidated Plan CARSON 142
2025-2029
Planned Activities This activity will provide a variety of after-school development and educational support programming for youth.
4 Project Name Venice Family Clinic
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Deliver Community Services
Needs Addressed Services for special needs and LMI households Funding CDBG: [INSERT AMOUNT]
Description Venice Family Clinic (which has taken over from South Bay Family Health Care, with which it merged) operates a free community health clinic for the uninsured and underinsured on the campus of Carson High School.

Target Date 6/30/2026
Estimate the number
and type of families
that will benefit from
the proposed
activities
2,000 low- and moderate-income families
Location Description 270 West 223rd Street, Carson, CA 90745 Planned Activities Venice Family Clinic operates a free community health clinic for the uninsured and underinsured on the campus of Carson High School. 5 Project Name Program Administration
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Expand affordable housing options
Maintain and promote neighborhood preservation
Improve public facilities and infrastructure
Deliver community services
Needs Addressed Decent affordable housing
Neighborhood preservation
Services for special needs and LMI households
Priority public facilities and infrastructure
Fair housing
Funding CDBG: [INSERT AMOUNT]
Description This budget allocation is used to cover a portion of the personnel and non-personnel costs associated with the administration of the CDBG entitlement program for the City of Carson. The activities and staff functions covered under this allocation include general administration,

Consolidated Plan CARSON 143
2025-2029
planning (including housing, economic development, public improvement, capital improvement, and neighborhood planning), performance reporting and monitoring, equal opportunity compliance and programming, the implementation of the public outreach and citizen participation for the Five-Year Consolidated Plan planning process as well as the dissemination of information and facilitation of public participation needed to further the goals and objectives of Annual Action Plans. In addition to salary and benefit reimbursement for staff, this administration allocation includes other costs related to the administration of the CDBG program such as computer hardware/software, office supplies, support materials and staff training.

Target Date 6/30/2026
Estimate the number
and type of families
that will benefit from
the proposed
activities
Not applicable
Location Description Administration activities are carried out at the Carson Community Center, 801 East Carson Street (as the Housing Division has been relocated from City Hall).

Planned Activities Planned activities for administration include administering the CDBG program including monitoring visits, monthly review of program reports and fiscal reimbursement documentation, drawdowns, communication with agencies, directing RFP processes, and completing and executing subrecipient agreements and other contracts, among other activities.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 144
2025-2029
AP-50 Geographic Distribution – 91.220(f)

Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed

Geographic Distribution

Not applicable. Please see discussion above.

Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically

Not applicable. Please see discussion above.

Discussion

Not applicable. Please see discussion above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 145
2025-2029
Affordable Housing
AP-55 Affordable Housing – 91.220(g)

Introduction

In addition to federal funding, the City will continue to seek additional funding sources to support as many Carson households as possible.

Table AP-55.01: One-Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be
Supported
Homeless 0
Non-Homeless 9
Special-Needs 0
Total 9

Table AP-55.02: One-Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported
Through
Rental Assistance 0
The Production of New Units 0
Rehab of Existing Units 9
Acquisition of Existing Units 0
Total 9

Discussion

The above tables reflect the projected activity for the Neighborhood Pride housing rehabilitation program (single-family homes and mobile homes).

Consolidated Plan CARSON 146
2025-2029
AP-60 Public Housing – 91.220(h)
Introduction

In the wake of the statewide dissolution of redevelopment agencies (which, under the California Redevelopment Law, were required to allocate 20% of the tax increment revenues they received toward affordable housing), the City of Carson created a Carson Housing Authority to carry out the remaining affordable housing obligations. In that role, the Carson Housing Authority reviews proposals from prospective housing developers and determines to what extent it will provide assistance (primarily financial) to those developers.

Despite its name, however, the Carson Housing Authority does not own or operate any public housing within the city boundaries. In Carson, the role of a “public housing authority” (PHA), as the term is commonly understood, is carried out by the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA, formerly the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles, or HACoLA).

LACDA manages over 3,600 units of public housing in properties located throughout Los Angeles County (none in Carson), and also provides rental assistance to over 20,000 families within the County.

Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing

Not applicable, as the City of Carson does not own, operate, or manage any public housing.

Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership

Not applicable.

If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance

The public housing agency operating in Carson is the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles (HACoLA), a division of the Los Angeles Community Development Authority (LACDA).

HACoLA is not designated as troubled.

Discussion

Please see above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 147
2025-2029
AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities – 91.220(i)

Introduction

As previously mentioned, the City also collaborates with LAHSA on the annual Point-in-Time (PIT) count to engage and survey individuals experiencing homelessness to provide an accurate count of the region’s unsheltered and sheltered homeless populations.

• Continued involvement by City staff in the regular monthly meetings of the South Bay Coalition to End Homelessness;
• Ongoing participation in the Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative; • Continued participation in a joint program of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) to coordinate the following activities: outreach services; a South Bay Cities homeless hotline, screenings, and coordinated entry system assessments; case management; linkages to interim housing; housing location services; outreach to local landlords; and ongoing supportive services; and Regular meetings of the City’s Homeless Task Force, which is coordinated by the Assistant City Manager and includes the Community Development, Community Services, and Public Safety Departments, as well as the County Sheriff’s Department (the law enforcement agency in Carson).

Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs

As noted previously, LAHSA conducts point-in-time counts on an annual basis. In the 2024 PIT Count for Service Planning Area 8 (SPA 8)—which covers the South Bay region within the Los Angeles Continuum of Care (excluding Long Beach)—there were 1,436 sheltered individuals and

Consolidated Plan CARSON 148
2025-2029
3,992 unsheltered individuals, totaling 5,428 individuals experiencing homelessness.

The City of Carson collaborates with the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) to conduct targeted outreach to individuals experiencing homelessness, particularly those who are unsheltered. SBCCOG has partnered with People Assisting the Homeless (PATH), a statewide network of service providers specializing in homelessness response. PATH's outreach teams engage directly with unsheltered individuals, building trusting relationships to assess their specific needs and connect them to essential services. These services include housing assistance, interim housing, veterans' services, mental health care, medical services, employment support, and benefits enrollment. By providing comprehensive, person-centered support, PATH aims to help individuals transition from homelessness to stable housing and improved well-being.

Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons

At present, there are no emergency shelters or transitional housing facilities located in the city of Carson. Since there is an obvious need for such facilities, the City is exploring two avenues:
a) outreach to a provider or providers of emergency shelters and/or transitional housing facilities who may be interested in operating such facilities within the city; or b) becoming such a provider itself.

The City recently prepared and adopted amendments to its Zoning Code that accomplished the following:
• Permitting emergency shelters by right in the ML (Manufacturing Light) and MH (Manufacturing Heavy) zones, and providing for development and operational standards;
• Identifying transitional and supportive housing as a residential use and permitting it in all residential zones, subject only to those standards /regulations that apply to other residential uses of the same type in the same zone; and • Permitting single-room occupancy (SRO) units in at least one zone.

These changes will enable to City to monitor the inventory of sites appropriate to accommodate emergency, transitional, and supportive housing facilities and work with appropriate organizations to ensure that the needs of the homeless and extremely low income households are met.

As a result of participation in the Los Angeles County Homeless Initiative, City staff has become aware of SB (Senate Bill) 2, a State law requiring each city or county to identify at least one zone

Consolidated Plan CARSON 149
2025-2029
where emergency shelters are permitted by right and treating transitional and supportive housing as residential uses of property, subject only to restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone, so one of the tasks ahead for the Carson Homelessness Task Force would be to monitor the existing planning and zoning regulations to ensure the City’s compliance with SB 2.

Time-Limited Subsidies are a key component of the LA Continuum of Care's permanent housing portfolio, designed to assist individuals and families who do not require deeper, long-term support, such as Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH). These programs operate under a Housing First approach, meaning they serve individuals regardless of housing barriers and incorporate trauma-informed care and harm reduction strategies to ensure accessibility and effectiveness.

By providing flexible, short-term assistance, these programs help prevent returns to homelessness and support individuals in maintaining stable housing after their initial placement.

Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs

One of the local social service providers that has received CDBG public service funds in the past,

Consolidated Plan CARSON 150
2025-2029
the Office of Samoan Affairs, has incorporated a program of services to the homeless and persons at risk of becoming homeless (primarily counseling, referral to appropriate agencies, and assistance in applying for and obtaining benefits) into its multifaceted portfolio of services.

Additionally, the City entered into its own contract with PATH (using funding other than CDBG) for additional outreach services within Carson.

Discussion

See above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 151
2025-2029
AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing – 91.220(j)

Introduction

Both market and governmental factors can pose constraints to the provision of adequate and affordable housing. Two of the greatest barriers to affordable housing continue to be cost and supply. As demonstrated in the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, there is a great need for affordable housing in Carson. The City of Carson will continue to remove any barriers to affordable housing possible through the implementation of the Housing Element in compliance with State law, and by reducing development and cost constraints to developing housing when possible. Additionally, the City will continue to leverage available funding sources to support the development and preservation of affordable housing.

Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment

The City of Carson does experience barriers to affordable housing as identified in the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, including governmental constraints, market conditions, lack of funding sources, and land and construction costs. Many of the barriers are not controlled by the City, such as land and construction costs and state/federal constraints.

The City of Carson initiated an update of its Housing Element in 2022. The City will follow up on any governmental constraints to housing development that are identified in the Housing Element, including appropriate amendments to the Zoning Code.

The City continues to pursue the following strategies:

• Employ several policies to provide greater flexibility in site planning and promote more intense development. The City continuously monitors available sites that may be appropriate for residential uses. A density floor is a tool that can be used to promote maximum land use, establishing a minimum density within a given residential land use designation. The availability of developable acreage in upper density ranges allows for the development of certain types of housing.
• Continue considering alternate forms of development, including small-lot, single-family subdivisions; mobile home parks that allow owner-occupied spaces; senior citizen developments offering various types of care and assistance; mixed use

Consolidated Plan CARSON 152
2025-2029
residential/office/commercial developments; and planned unit developments (the latter being a form long in existence in the city, and the mixed-use residential/office/commercial model is seen to an increasing degree, for example, along Carson Street and Avalon Boulevard).
• To encourage developers to pursue low- and moderate-income housing projects, California provides regulatory tools to govern approval processes, permitting greater density for affordable housing projects that include additional development incentives.

The City employs a Density Bonus Ordinance to encourage developers to develop a portion of an otherwise market-rate product as affordable for low and moderate incomes, in order to meet the State-mandated affordable housing responsibilities. • Monitor all housing built prior to 1980 for lead-based paint and other hazardous or unsafe housing issues.
• Continue monitoring low- to moderate-income housing developments that have existing affordability controls for their risk of conversion to market rate. • Continue offering financial assistance to households that cannot qualify for conventional home improvement loans, in order to encourage and support the preservation of the affordable housing stock.
• Continue efforts to combat blighted and substandard housing through a combination of tools including enforcement, citation, and referral to the City’s housing rehabilitation programs.
• Continue, through the Carson Housing Authority, assisting the development of affordable multi-family housing.
• Encourage the development of mixed-use projects, including the development of specific plans that require housing as a key component of those developments. • Implement a 2012 Zoning Code amendment to facilitate development of housing for persons with disabilities. Housing opportunities for persons with disabilities can be addressed by the provision of affordable, barrier-free housing. Rehabilitation assistance can be targeted toward disabled renters and homeowners for necessary unit modifications.
• Seek State and Federal funds in support of housing construction and rehabilitation targeted toward persons with developmental disabilities. Also, provide regulatory incentives, such as expedited permit processing and fee waivers/deferrals, to projects targeted toward such persons. To further facilitate the development of housing units to accommodate persons with these disabilities, reach out annually to developers of supportive housing to encourage development of projects targeted toward special

Consolidated Plan CARSON 153
2025-2029
needs groups.

Discussion

Please see above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 154
2025-2029
AP-85 Other Actions – 91.220(k)

Introduction

This section discusses the City’s underserved needs and institutional structure for delivering housing and community development activities, as identified in the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan.

The most pressing underserved need in the community is affordable housing. Additionally, there is a significant need for housing and support services for populations with special needs, including seniors, large families, single-parent households, individuals with HIV/AIDS, and those with mental, physical, or emotional disabilities.

Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs

Limited resource availability remains one of the greatest challenges in addressing the needs of underserved populations. To maximize impact, the City prioritizes collaboration and leveraging of funds, working with governmental agencies, nonprofits, businesses, and other entities to coordinate the provision of services in Carson.

Many residents face economic hardship due to barriers such as unemployment, underemployment, limited education, and lack of job skills training. Other contributing factors include low wages, a shortage of affordable childcare, and a lack of nearby affordable housing options, all of which make it difficult for lower-income households and single parents to enter or remain in the workforce. To help address employability and job training challenges, the City partners with the South Bay Workforce Investment Board (SBWIB), a local Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) consortium that provides job placement, training, and workforce development services.

Transportation access also remains a significant obstacle, particularly for residents who rely on public transit for employment, education, and essential services. The City operates the Carson Circuit bus system, which coordinates with multiple regional transit providers, including the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Long Beach Transit, Compton Renaissance Transit, Torrance Transit, and Gardena Municipal Bus Lines. These efforts help

Consolidated Plan CARSON 155
2025-2029
improve mobility and expand economic opportunities for Carson residents.

Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing

As noted in the Projects section of this Annual Action Plan, over one-third of the proposed allocation of the City’s CDBG funds will be directed toward a major housing rehabilitation program aimed at maintaining and preserving the supply of affordable housing units in the city, the Neighborhood Pride Program.

In response to the State action eliminating local redevelopment agencies, the City of Carson created a Carson Housing Authority (CHA), which is assuming the housing programs of the former Carson Redevelopment Agency. The principal activities of the CHA are:
• Continuing rental assistance payments to two affordable multi-tenant residential developments (Avalon Courtyard, 92 units located at 22127 South Avalon Boulevard, and Carson Terrace Senior Apartments, 62 units located at 632 East 219th Street). • Monitoring Carson’s existing affordable housing projects for compliance with terms of their development agreements. Most of these projects were made possible by Redevelopment Agency loans.
• Seeing projects to completion, such as projects at 2525 East Carson Street and 21227- 21237 South Figueroa Street.
• Moving projects with existing development agreements forward to completion. This includes the soon-to-be completed Veterans Village at Carson (51 units at the corner of Carson and Figueroa Streets) and Carson Arts Colony (46 units at 21205 South Main Street).
• With any remaining funds, the CHA will form or assist new projects on other sites.

At present, the CHA’s functions do not include the operation of public housing (such as the Federally-assisted Section 8 program). That role within the boundaries of the city will continue to be carried out by the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles (HACoLA), a division of the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA).

The City will also continue to seek new HOME Investment Partnership Program funding.

Though not an entitlement community for HOME, the City has in the past obtained HOME funding through the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), and is currently (until July 2020) utilizing a $500,000 HOME grant from HCD with which it is operating a housing rehabilitation program targeted toward low- and very low-income

Consolidated Plan CARSON 156
2025-2029
homeowners.

Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards

The City realizes that lead-based paint poses a serious health hazard and therefore must be addressed. The City is attempting to minimize the incidence of lead paint poisoning by implementing the following:
• Ensuring that home improvement programs initiated by the City or non-profit providers identify and eliminate lead-based paint hazards;
• Considering annual programs and materials that educate residents on the health dangers of lead-based paint and encourage the screening of children for elevated blood levels;
• Including lead-based paint hazard reduction as an eligible activity in rehabilitation programs;
• Reviewing current housing and rehabilitation cases to ensure that lead-based paint hazard reduction is incorporated; and
• Promoting awareness and elimination of lead-based paint hazards among other housing providers, including local non-profit housing developers.

The City’s efforts to conform to (24 CFR) Section 570.608 regarding the notification, inspection, testing, and abatement procedures concerning lead-based paint as required in the CDBG certifications have most recently included the engagement of a consultant to conduct lead hazard inspections/evaluations, paint testing, risk assessments, and final clearance inspections.

All properties served by the City’s housing rehabilitation programs undergo an initial lead hazard assessment, with subsequent actions to be determined according to the results of that assessment.

Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families

Consolidated Plan CARSON 157
2025-2029
housing policies with economic development and social services, the City ensures a comprehensive approach to poverty reduction, helping residents achieve long-term financial stability and self-sufficiency while strengthening the overall community.

Actions planned to develop institutional structure

The City of Carson Community Development Department will ensure the effective administration of HUD entitlement grants and oversee the implementation of activities outlined in the Annual Action Plan. The department will continue to enhance operational efficiencies through improved coordination, technical assistance, and oversight of housing and community development programs.

The City will maintain ongoing collaboration with other municipal departments, government agencies, non-profit organizations, and private sector partners to facilitate the provision of housing, public services, and infrastructure improvements. The Community Development Department works closely with external agencies such as the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles (HACoLA) to ensure that low-income residents have access to safe and stable housing. Through strong interagency coordination, the City will continue to administer CDBG and other funding programs while seeking opportunities to enhance service delivery.

Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies

The City of Carson is committed to strengthening coordination between public and private housing providers and social service agencies to ensure the efficient delivery of housing and support services for residents in need. The City relies on a network of nonprofit social service organizations to provide essential services and collaborates with affordable housing developers to implement its housing goals.

To enhance coordination, the City will continue engaging with public agencies, housing providers, and service organizations throughout the year to plan and maximize the use of available resources. Regular communication will be maintained to facilitate the review and endorsement of funding applications, discuss opportunities for cooperative initiatives, and ensure that service providers and housing developers work together effectively. The City has historically allocated up to 15% of its annual CDBG funding for social services, reinforcing its

Consolidated Plan CARSON 158
2025-2029
commitment to supporting vulnerable populations.

Housing developments serving specific populations will also play a role in strengthening service coordination by informing residents about available local services and ensuring that service agencies are aware of upcoming housing opportunities during the project approval process.

Discussion

See above.

Consolidated Plan CARSON 159
2025-2029
Program Specific Requirements

AP-90 Program Specific Requirements – 91.220(l)(1,2,4)
Introduction
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out.

1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 1,024

2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan
0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0

4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan. 0 5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0 Total Program Income 1,024

Other CDBG Requirements

1. The amount of urgent need activities 0

2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be
used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum
overall benefit of 70 percent of CDBG funds is used to
benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan.

70.00%

0 City of Carson

Citizen Participation Plan for Programs
Funded Under the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development’s Office
of Community Planning and Development

Prepared by the Community Development Department
Updated April 2025

1 Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................. 2 Participation Policies ............................................................................................... 2 Citywide Advisory Commission................................................................................. 3 Development of Plans .............................................................................................. 4 Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) .................................. 5 Publication and Review Periods ................................................................................ 6 Public Hearings ........................................................................................................ 7 Plan Amendments .................................................................................................... 7 Access to Information and Records .......................................................................... 9 Technical Assistance ............................................................................................... 9 Comment and Complaint Process ............................................................................ 9 Anti-displacement and Relocation .......................................................................... 10 Monitoring and Evaluation ...................................................................................... 10 Appendix A: Community Organizations for Outreach Engagement ............................ 13 Appendix B: Community Organizations Serving People with Disabilities ................... 17

2 Introduction

The City of Carson (City) receives an annual entitlement of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for housing and community development activities to assist people with low to moderate incomes. In accordance with HUD requirements, the City must create a Five-Year Consolidated Plan (Consolidated Plan) that addresses affordable housing and community development needs, submit an Annual Action Plan (Action Plan) to outline spending and activities for the upcoming program year, and provide a Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) that summarizes the City’s accomplishments and use of CDBG funds in the previous program year.

Pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 24 CFR 91.105, the City must have and follow a detailed Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) that sets forth the City’s policies and procedures for community participation, solicitation of views, and recommendations from members of the community and other interested parties; a consideration of the views and recommendations received; and a process for incorporating such views and recommendations into decisions and outcomes related to CDBG funds.

This Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) serves to meet the federal requirements described above concurrently.

Participation Policies

The City actively encourages public involvement in development of its plans and reports. Community participation is crucial at every stage of the planning process, including identifying needs, setting priorities based on those needs, recommending activities to address high-priority needs, and evaluating the effectiveness of the programs and activities.

In addition to public input, the City welcomes comments from organizations serving Carson’s communities, including organizations serving residents with disabilities. A list of organizations that may be included in outreach efforts can be found in Appendices A and B.

The public will be given the maximum feasible opportunity to participate in the development of the Consolidated Plan, Action Plan, CAPER (Plan(s)) and substantial amendments to these Plans. The City will do the following in the development and implementation of the Plans:

• Encourage participation from residents.

• Encourage the involvement of persons with low to moderate incomes, particularly those living in the low- to moderate-income communities where funds are proposed to be used, and communities with planned revitalization.

3 • Encourage the involvement of residents of affordable, permanent supportive, and public housing.

• Encourage the involvement of residents with disabilities; racial and ethnic minorities; and residents who speak English as a second language.

• Encourage participation from organizations and businesses that support people with low to moderate incomes, such as the local Continuum of Care (CoC) developers, public health agencies, adjacent local governments, nonprofit organizations, philanthropic organizations, community-based and faith-based organizations, public housing agencies, resident advisory boards, resident councils, and/or resident management corporations.

• Provide residents reasonable and timely access to information, meetings, and records.

• Provide residents the opportunity to review and offer input and feedback regarding the use of CDBG, fair housing efforts, and the CAPER.

• Provide reasonable accommodations and translation services upon request, provided such services are available.

• Use comprehensive techniques to encourage and measure public participation and review program performance.

Additional efforts to be taken by the City to encourage public participation can be found in the “Development of Plans” section of this CPP.

Citywide Advisory Commission

City Ordinance 08-1399, adopted on February 6, 2008, designates the Citywide Advisory Commission (Commission) to serve in an advisory role to the City Council, staff, and City consultants on matters concerning the evaluation of community-wide issues related to CDBG funding, census activities, and special funding requests.

The Commission is responsible for contributing to the development of needs data and recommending priorities among identified needs, assisting in the refinement of both long- and short-term community development objectives, and discussing preferences among specific program options.

Additionally, the Commission reviews and provides feedback on community development strategies, facilitates citizen participation requirements in federally funded programs in accordance with Title 24 CFR Section 91.105 as directed by the City Council (which includes conducting public hearings), and serves as a platform for exchanging information and receiving input from the City Council and local citizens regarding the CDBG program, census activities, and special funding requests.

4 Development of Plans

As an entitlement jurisdiction, the City is required to prepare the following documents:

• Five-Year Consolidated Plan (Consolidated Plan);

• Annual Action Plan (Action Plan);

• Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER); and

• Citizen Participation Plan (CPP).

The City will make a concerted effort to notify residents, social service providers, business groups, nonprofit organizations, community and faith-based organizations, community boards and other interested parties of the development of the Consolidated Plan, Action Plan, and CAPER through public noticing, such as electronic mail, online postings, and newspaper notices.

The City will issue a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) and/or Request for Proposals (RFP) inviting proposals for CDBG activities. Upon request, the City will provide technical assistance to established organizations representing persons with extremely low to moderate income to develop proposals for eligible activities.

City staff will review annual grant proposals and make recommendations to the Carson City Council (City Council) concerning federal funding. City Council meetings are open to the public and available for viewing on the City’s website.

The City’s annual program year begins July 1 and concludes on the succeeding June 30 th. Every year, the City will prepare the Action Plan, which may contain a list of projects to be funded for the given program year with any additional funding received.

During each program year, additional funding may become available due to program income or projects that are under budget, delayed, or cancelled. A list of capital improvement projects may also be included in the Action Plan and approved by the City Council to serve as back-up projects. The City may initiate these projects at any time when funding becomes available. The City must receive HUD approval for these back- up projects along with the approved and funded projects as part of its approval of the Action Plan. Initiation and funding of these projects would not constitute a substantial amendment as defined within.

Prior to adoption of the Consolidated Plan and Action Plan, the City will make available the estimated amount of CDBG funding that it expects to receive, the activities that may be undertaken, the estimated amount of funds that will be used to benefit persons with low to moderate incomes, and any activities that may result in displacement.

To further encourage public participation, the City will publish public notices summarizing the proposed Consolidated Plan and/or Action Plan. Notices will be published in the local newspaper and on the City’s website. These notices will be 5 published at least ten (10) days before the scheduled public hearing. Each notice will include a summary of the Plan(s), outlining its content and purpose, a list of locations where the full Plan(s) can be reviewed, and details of the public hearing, including the date, time, and location.

The draft Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan will be made available for public review at least 30 days prior to final adoption. The public may access the draft plans on the City’s website and at the below locations. In addition, any amendments to the Consolidated Plan or Action Plan, as well as the CAPER, will also be made available for public review at the same locations.

City of Carson Office of the City Clerk (Office of the City Clerk) 701 East Carson Street
Carson, California 90745

City of Carson Community Development Department
701 East Carson Street
Carson, California 90745

Los Angeles County Public Library- Carson Regional Branch 151 East Carson Street
Carson, California 90745

The City will provide a reasonable number of free copies to citizens and groups upon request.

Following the 30-day public review and comment period, the City Council will adopt the Consolidated Plan or Action Plan and direct staff to finalize and submit it. A summary of all comments, including unaccepted comments with reasons for non-acceptance, will be included. The final Plan will be submitted to HUD at least 45 days before the start of the program year (July 1).

Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER)

The City will prepare an annual CAPER to evaluate the progress of the Consolidated Plan and to review accomplishments for the previous program year. Prior to submitting the CAPER to HUD, the public must be noticed. The City will issue a notice that will include the contents and purpose of the CAPER; and a list of locations where copies of the entire draft CAPER can be reviewed.

The CAPER will be available for review at the Office of the City Clerk, City’s Community Development Department, LA County Public Library – Carson Regional Branch, and on the City’s website. A comment period of not less than 15 days will be provided. All comments received in writing or orally will be included in the final submission to HUD.

The CAPER will be submitted to HUD no later than 90 days following the conclusion of the program year (June 30) to which it applies, pursuant to HUD regulations. 6 Publication and Review Periods

The City will incorporate multiple methods to inform residents, entitlement grant beneficiaries, local government officials, housing and community development officials, and others about public meetings, public hearings, and comment periods. The available methods are listed below; not all shall be used for each meeting but will be implemented as City staff deems appropriate in relation to the action being considered.

• Press release announcing the public forums, public hearings, and review and comment periods

• Notification on the City’s website

• Publication in a newspaper of general circulation

• Direct notification to residents and organizations currently being affected by the City’s CDBG funds, either through direct funding or through City-sponsored programs

• Direct notification (mail, e-mail, newsletter or flyers) to groups and/or organizations and individuals who have expressed an interest or whom the City identifies as having a greater potential interest, including but not limited to:
people with disabilities, seniors, and people experiencing or at risk of experiencing homelessness

• Notice/distribution will include City Council Offices, City Hall, and/or other inter- City departments

• News, media, and online sources

Notices for public hearings shall be publicized with a minimum of 10 days’ advanced notice.

The City shall provide reasonable public comment periods to ensure that all interested parties have sufficient time to examine the contents of any of the standard documents and submit written comments prior to finalization. City staff will aim to provide a thoughtful and written response to public comments within 15 days of receipt, whenever feasible. A summary of the written and public hearing comments and a summary of all comments not accepted and their reasons for dismissal will be attached to final documents and presented to the City Council for consideration.

Standard documents shall be available for public review on the City’s website and at the locations listed below. With the exception of the CAPER, all plans and substantial amendments shall have a public review and comment duration of a minimum of 30 calendar days. The CAPER shall have a public comment period of no less than 15 days.

7 Public Hearings

The City will conduct a minimum of two (2) public hearings during different stages of each program year. One of the required public hearings will be conducted prior to the publication of the proposed Consolidated Plan or Action Plan.

All public hearing notices will be placed as a legal notice or display advertisement in the City’s officially designated outlet for legal advertising (presently Our Weekly), or another publication of general circulation, for a minimum of 10 days prior to the public hearing date.

All public hearings, meetings of the City Council, and meetings of the Citywide Advisory Commission will be held at public facilities that are accessible to people with disabilities, which may include but is not limited to Carson City Hall (701 East Carson Street) and the Congresswoman Juanita Millender-McDonald Community Center (801 East Carson Street).

If special assistance or accommodations are needed to participate in a public hearing, please contact the City’s Community Development Department at least five working days prior to the date of that meeting. Persons with hearing or speech disabilities can dial 711 to connect with a free TTY service, which will assist in contacting the City’s Community Development Department for reasonable accommodations. Such an advisory will be included within the text of all publicly posted notices of such public meetings and/or public hearings.

Persons who would like information on the City’s compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 should contact the City’s Community Development Department at [email protected] or
by phone at 310-830-7600 ext. 1305.

Translation services will be available at public meetings upon advanced request.

Plan Amendments

The City shall amend the approved use of CDBG funds in the Consolidated Plan or Action Plan whenever one of the following decisions is made:

a) to make a change in allocation priorities, or a change in the method of the distribution of funds.

b) to carry out an activity, using funds from any program covered by the Consolidated Plan or Action Plan (including program income) not previously described in the Consolidated Plan or the Action Plan.

c) to change the purpose, scope, location, or beneficiaries of an eligible activity. 8 A substantial amendment occurs with one or more of the following:

a) An increase greater than 100% of the activity allocated if the allocation is $50,000 or more as listed in a published Consolidated Plan or Action Plan, or as amended.

b) An increase greater than $50,000 of the activity allocation if the allocation is less than $50,000 as listed in a published Consolidated Plan, or as amended.

c) An increase or decrease in an activity allocation greater than $300,000.

d) A new activity not previously described in a published Consolidated Plan, or as amended.

Substantial amendments must be authorized by City Council and will be available on the City’s website and through public notices in the newspaper. Minor changes and/or corrections may be made, so long as the changes do not constitute a substantial amendment. Minor changes, including but not limited to modifications of goal outcome indicators, shall not be considered a substantial amendment, and do not require public review or a public hearing.

All substantial amendments will be published in a newspaper of general circulation and will provide for a minimum public review and comment period of 30 days. The City will consider any comments received in writing, or orally at public hearings, regarding substantial amendments. A summary of these comments or views, and a summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons therefor, shall be attached to the substantial amendments of the Consolidated Plan or Action Plan, as applicable. No substantial amendments will be implemented prior to the expiration of the minimum 30- day public review and comment period.

Exceptions to this minimum 30-day public review and comment period will be made only in the case of a waiver of the 30-day requirement granted by HUD. In such a case, the published notice of the review and comment period will state the applicable timeframe.

Public notices will be published at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. Notices will include the date, time, location, and summary of the proposed action to help facilitate informed comments.

Upon City Council approval of the substantial amendments, the City will make the approved amendment public and notify HUD. A copy of each substantial amendments will be sent to HUD once approved. Letters transmitting copies of substantial amendments will be signed by the official representative of the City authorized to take such action.

Any changes in federal funding levels made after the comment period for the draft 9 Consolidated Plan and/or Action Plan has expired will not be considered an amendment or substantial amendment, even if these changes affect the distribution of funds.

Access to Information and Records

The City will ensure timely and reasonable access to information and records related to the development of the Consolidated Plan and CDBG program expenditures for the past five years. Available information includes the adopted Consolidated Plan or Action Plan, substantial amendments, performance reports, meeting minutes, and public comments.

Requests for information and records must be made to the City in writing. Staff will strive to respond within fifteen (15) business days, or as soon as possible thereafter.

Upon request, these documents will also be provided in accessible formats for people with disabilities.

Technical Assistance

Upon request, the City will provide technical assistance to organizations, particularly those representing persons with extremely low to moderate incomes, to help develop funding requests for CDBG-eligible activities. This assistance will include responding in writing to all written inquiries and verbally addressing verbal questions received from residents or group representatives on how to prepare and submit eligible program or project proposals. The City will also meet with groups or individuals, upon request, to help identify specific needs and support the preparation of project proposal applications.

Comment and Complaint Process

The City will consider any comments from residents received in writing or orally at public hearings in preparing this CPP, Consolidated Plan, Action Plans, CAPERs, and/or substantial amendments to these plans. A summary of all comments will be attached and submitted to HUD. The City will make a concerted effort to respond in writing to comments within 15 business days of receipt of comments. All written comments should be directed to the City’s Community Development Department.

The City will respond to written complaints received relating to the Consolidated Plan, Action Plans, CAPERs, and/or substantial amendments. Written complaints must describe the objection, date of complaint, and contact information of the complainant.

The City will respond to complaints within 15 business days of receiving the written complaint, acknowledging the letter, and identifying a plan of action. If necessary, correspondence may be addressed to:

10 City of Carson Community Development Department
701 East Carson Street
Carson, California 90745
[email protected]
310-830-7600 ext. 1305

Persons wishing to contact the Los Angeles Area HUD Office may address correspondence to:

U.S. Housing and Urban Development
Hong Lin
300 North Los Angeles St., Suite 4054
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Anti-displacement and Relocation

In the event that any residential displacement and relocation will result from program activity, the City ensures that, prior to carrying out the program activity, an Anti- Displacement and Relocation Plan in connection with that program activity will be developed.

In the event that any acquisition and/or relocation must take place in order to carry out a program activity, the City will ensure the acquisition and relocation comply with requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and implementing regulations at 49 CFR Part 24.

Monitoring and Evaluation

The City’s Community Development Department or its designee is responsible for monitoring activities implemented pursuant to the Consolidated Plan or Action Plan.

The Community Development Department will perform annual monitoring of all activities to ensure compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including the comprehensive planning requirements.
11 DEFINITIONS

Annual Action Plan (AAP) – An annual update to the Five-Year Consolidated Plan which highlights the activities to be conducted during a single program year in support of the priorities identified in the Consolidated Plan.

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) – A compilation of regulations issued by agencies of the federal government for the implementation of, compliance with, and enforcement of statutes enacted by the U.S. Congress.

Community Planning and Development (CPD) – The division of HUD responsible for administering that Department’s program(s) of formula-based financial assistance to states and units of local government (such as counties and cities).

Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) – An annual performance report of CDBG funds.

Consolidated Plan Program Year (see also Program Year) – The 12-month period for implementing HUD CPD programs. The program year shall begin on the first calendar day of a month.

Cost Burden – The extent to which gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceed 30% of gross income, based on data available from the U. S. Census Bureau.

Elderly Person – A person who is at least 62 years of age.

Extremely Low-Income Household – A household whose income does not exceed 30% of the median family income (adjusted for household size) for the Los Angeles/Long Beach/Glendale Metropolitan Fair Market Rent Area (Los Angeles County).

Large Family – Family of five or more persons.

Low-Income Household – A household whose income does not exceed 80% of the median income (adjusted for household size) of the median family income for the Los Angeles/Long Beach/Glendale Metropolitan Fair Market Rent Area (Los Angeles County).

Moderate-Income Household – A household whose income does is 80% to 120% of the median family income for the Los Angeles/Long Beach/Glendale Metropolitan Fair Market Rent Area (Los Angeles County).

Program Year – For HUD CPD programs, the Program Year has been established as beginning on July 1 and ending on the succeeding June 30. The HUD CPD program year corresponds with the City’s fiscal year.
12 Slum or Blighted Area – An area which meets a definition of a slum, blighted, deteriorated, or deteriorating area under state or local law, or where there is a substantial number of deteriorating or dilapidated buildings or improvements throughout the area.

13 Appendix A
Community Organizations for Outreach Engagement

Carson Samoan Assembly of God
1647 E. Carson St.

Carson, CA 90745
(310) 834-4898, (310) 834-3125
Iglesia Roca de Salvacion
24100 S. Avalon Blvd.

Carson, CA 90745
(310) 834-6951
http://carsonrocadesalvacion.org
(Website appears to be in Spanish
only)
Mission Ebenezer Family Church
Rev. Dr. Isaac Canales, Sr. Pastor
415 W. Torrance Blvd.

Carson. CA 90746
(310) 329-9128
www.missionebenezer.org

Samoan Congregational Church of the
City of Carson
(in another directory, this is listed as
“United Samoan Congregational
Church”)
Rev. Taisi Alaelua, Pastor
1717 E. Carson St.

Carson, CA 90745
(310) 549-0030
Samoan Congregational Community
Church
(in another directory, this is listed as
“Samoan Congregational Church”)
Rev. Fiatupu Tavai, Pastor
324 W. Carson St.

Carson, CA 90745
(310) 350-6685
http://sccsamoan.com
[email protected]
Spanish Seventh-Day Adventist
Church
Rev. Javier Elenes, Pastor
21828 Dolores St.

Carson, CA 90745
(310) 513-9733, (310) 549-0951
http://carsonspanish22.adventistchurchconnect.or
g
[email protected]

St. Philomena Catholic Church
21900 S. Main St.

Carson, CA 90745
Father Francis Ilano, Pastor
(310) 835-7161, (310) 830-5469 (fax)
www.stphilomenaparish.org
[email protected]

Zion United Methodist Korean Church
213 E. Lomita Blvd.

Carson, CA 90745
Rev. Son Pom Ye, Pastor
(310) 834-5504

Erasto R. Batongmalaque
Foundation/Filipino Veterans
Foundation
Sinaitenians of California
22035 S. Main St., #24
Carson, CA 90745
14 Dr. Jenny Batongmalaque, Executive
Director
23247 S. Main St.

Carson, CA 90745
(310) 835-8365
[email protected]
(310) 835-2472

Carson African American
Empowerment Coalition
Del Huff, President
868 E. Meadbrook St.

Carson, CA 90746
(310) 639-4026
Carson Black Heritage Association
Iva Voldase, President
19419 Tajauta Ave.

Carson, CA 90746
(323) 636-9429
Samoan Federation of America
High Chief Loa Pele Faletogo,
President/Executive Director
404 E. Carson St.

Carson, CA 90745
(310) 834-6403
[email protected]
Filipino Community of Carson
1602 E. 220th St.

Carson, CA 90745
(310) 513-1787

Japanese American Citizens League
Southwest District
244 S. San Pedro St., Suite 507
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 626-4471
www.jaclpsw.org
[email protected]
League of United Latin American
Citizens
Carson Leadership Council #3031
Ramona Pimentel, President
PO Box 4752
Carson, CA 90749
(310) 549-0053
[email protected]
NAACP—California State Conference
c/o Olivia Verrett, Chairperson
PO Box 4994
Carson, CA 90749
(310) 901-2555
Office of Samoan Affairs, Inc.

June Pouesi, Executive Director
454 E. Carson Plaza Dr., Suite 109
Carson, CA 90746
(310) 538-0555
[email protected]
http://officeofsamoanaffairs.org
Palm House, Inc.

Renato Casaclang, Executive Director
2515 E. Jefferson St.

Carson, CA 90810
(310) 830-7803

Southern California Indian Center
400 Continental Blvd., 6th Fl.

El Segundo, CA 90245
(213) 387-5572

100 Black Women of Carson
Attn: Clara Johnson
603-B University Dr., #337
Carson, CA 90746
Confederation of Filipino American
Associations
Attn: Joe Merton
22122 S. Main St
15 Carson, CA 90745
[email protected]

Casa de los Angelitos
954 Koleeta Dr.

Harbor City, CA 90710
(310) 325-8208
www.casadelosangelitos.org
[email protected]
Asian American Drug Abuse Program
2900 Crenshaw Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90016
(323) 293-6284, (323) 295-4075 (fax)
www.aadapinc.org

Pacific American Student Services
Sai Momoli, Chairman
21207 S. Catskill Ave.

Carson, CA 90745
(310) 678-3104
[email protected]
Asociacion Cultural de South Bay
Attn: Raquel Beltran
PO Box 11713
Carson, CA 90749
(310) 631-0945, (310) 631-0957
Filipino Action Group for the
Environment
Attn: Fe Koons
1631 Ballard St.

Carson, CA 90745
Filipino American Services Group, Inc.
135 N. Park View St.

Los Angeles, CA 90026
(213) 487-9804, (213) 487-9806 (fax)
[email protected]
www.fasgi.org

Pacific Islands Center for Educational
Development
Gary King, President
24231 Seagrove Ave.

Carson, CA 90745
People’s Community Organization for
Reform and Empowerment
(People’s CORE)
1610 Beverly Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90026
(213) 241-0995
www.peoplescore.net
[email protected]
Philippine Independence Day
Foundation
Joe Merton, Chairman
Moises “Jun” Agilpay, President
208 E. Carson St., Suite 202
Carson, CA 90745
(310) 549-3111, (310) 847-7607 (fax)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.phildf.org

Mapuifagalele Seniors and Youths
Involvement, Inc.

Le’avea Asi, Executive Director
23742 S. Main St.

Carson, CA 90745
(310) 834-3200
Le’avea Asi, Executive Director

Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.

L. A. South Bay Alumnae Chapter
Cynthia Hunter, President
PO Box 11025
Kayumanggi Lions Club
Tess L. Valera, Secretary
(no mailing address was included)
(310) 650-9786
www.kayumanggi.org
16 Carson, CA 90749
http://lasouthbaydst.org
[email protected]
[email protected]
Torres Martinez Tribal TANF
4500 E. Pacific Coast Hwy., Suite 500
Long Beach, CA 90814
(310) 878-1600, (800) 665-7649
www.torresmartinez.org
Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Inc.

Lambda Pi Zeta Chapter
c/o Beatrice R. Nelson
PO Box 11622
Carson, CA 90746
(310) 532-2475
Beta Pi Sigma Sorority, Inc.

Alpha Gamma Chapter
Itelia Walker, President
1045 Helmick St.

Carson, CA 90746
Carson Black Chamber of Commerce
603-B University Dr., PMB #181
Carson, CA 90746
(310) 729-5627
United Samoan Church
(also listed as “United Samoan
Congregational Christian Church”)
Rev. Matagiese Tunoa, Pastor
600 E. Double St.

Carson, CA 90745
(310) 513-8901

17 Appendix B
Community Organizations Serving People with Disabilities

Mid-Cities Association
JB Wagoner, Executive Director
14208 Towne Ave.

Los Angeles, CA 90061
(310) 329-9272
(310) 738-9096
(310) 329-3939 (fax)
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://arcmidcities.org
Los Angeles County Department of
Mental Health
150 W. 7th St.

San Pedro, CA 90731
(310) 519-6100
(310) 519-6218
California Department of Rehabilitation
1929 W. Artesia Blvd., Suite C
Compton, CA 90220
(310) 637-1151
www.dor.ca.gov

California Department of Rehabilitation
4300 Long Beach Blvd., Suite 200
Long Beach, CA 90807
(562) 422-8325
www.dor.ca.gov
The California Endowment
Attn: James Suazo, Hub Coordinator
920 Atlantic Ave., Suite 103
Long Beach, CA 90813
(562) 436-4800

Los Angeles County Department of
Military and Veterans Affairs
17600 B Santa Fe Avenue
Rancho Dominguez, CA 90221
(310) 761-2030
Peak Performance Training Centers,
Inc.

Attn: Sylvia Ortiz
4859 W. Slauson Ave., #340
Los Angeles, CA 90056
[email protected]

California Employment Development
Department
4300 Long Beach Blvd., Suite 600
Long Beach, CA 90807
(562) 728-6708
California Employment Development
Department
1220 Engracia Ave.

Torrance, CA 90505
(310) 782-2101

California Employment Development
Department
2909 E. Pacific Commerce Dr.

Compton, CA 90221
(310) 223-0785
Gardena-Carson YMCA
Gretchen Downey, Executive Director
1000 W. Artesia Blvd.

Gardena, CA 90248

United States Veterans Initiative
2001 River Ave.

Long Beach, CA 90810
(562) 200-7300
18 Home Ownership for Personal
Empowerment
Kristin Martin, Executive Director
21231 Hawthorne Blvd.

Torrance, CA 90505
[email protected]
www.hope-homes.org
Los Angeles County Community and
Senior Services
Area Agency on Aging
3333 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90010
(213) 738-2600
Los Angeles Homeless Services
Authority
Attn: Chief Program Officer
811 Wilshire Blvd., 6th Fl.

Los Angeles, CA 90017
www.lahsa.org
Alcoholics Anonymous
South Bay Central Office
1411 Marcelina Ave.

Torrance, CA 90501
(310) 618-1180
The Salvation Army
4223 Emerald St.

Torrance, CA 90503
(310) 370-4515
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.torrancecorps.org
United Way of Greater Los Angeles
1129 N. Avalon Blvd.

Wilmington, CA 90744
(310) 518-2559
The Salvation Army HAVEN
Southern California Division
Attn: Charles Smith
11301 Wilshire Blvd., Building #212
Los Angeles, CA 90073
(310) 478-3111, ext. 44588
[email protected]

National Council on Alcoholism and
Drug Dependence of the South Bay
Attn: Barbara Smith
1334 Post Ave.

Torrance, CA 90501
(310) 320-1087
South Bay Workforce Investment
Board
11539 Hawthorne Blvd., 5th Fl.

Hawthorne, CA 90250
(310) 970-7700
info@sbwib,org
www.sbwib.org

California Department of Public Social
Services
17600 B Santa Fe Ave.

Rancho Dominguez, CA 90221
(310) 761=2030
Goodwill Southern California
342 San Fernando Rd.

Los Angeles, CA 90031
(323) 223-1211
(562) 435-3411 (Charles Fleming, ext.
289)
www.goodwill.org

Braille Institute of America
741 N. Vermont Ave.

Los Angeles, CA 90029
(323) 663-1111
[email protected]
www.brailleinstitute.org
19 Disabled Resources Center
Attn: Dolores Nason
2750 E. Spring St., Suite 100
Long Beach, CA 90806
(562) 427-1000
(562) 427-2027 (fax)
(562) 427-1366 (TTY)
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://www.drcinc.org

South Central Los Angeles Regional
Center for Persons with Developmental
Disabilities, Inc.

Dexter Henderson, Executive Director
2500 S. Western Ave.

Los Angeles, CA 90018
(213) 744-7000
www.sclarc.org
Los Angeles County Department of
Children & Family Services
2325 Crenshaw Blvd.

Torrance, CA 90501
(310) 972-3111

California Association of the Deaf
4708 Roseville Rd., Suite 111
North Highlands, CA 95660
www.cad1906.org
Social Security Administration
20000 Mariner Ave.

Torrance, CA 90505
(800) 772-1213

Social Security Administration
2005 Long Beach Blvd.

Long Beach, CA 90806
(800) 772-1213

EDD/GLAD
(a joint program of the California
Employment Development Department
and the Greater Los Angeles Agency
on Deafness, Inc.)
5401 S. Crenshaw Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90043
[email protected]
South Bay Family Health Care
270 E. 223rd St.

Carson, CA 90745
www.sbfhc.org

Harbor View Community Services
850 E. Wardlow Rd.

Long Beach, CA 90807
(562) 981-9392
Pacific Resources Psychological Group
4201 Long Beach Blvd., Suite 230
Long Beach, CA 90807
(562) 988-1000
Southern California Resource Services
for Independent Living
Attn: Rudy Contreras
7830 Quill Dr., Suite D
Downey, CA 90242
(562) 862-6531
(562) 923-5274 (fax)
(562) 869-0931 (TTY)
Autism Advocates in Action Support
Group
Attn: Renita Verner
552 E. Carson St., Suite 104
Carson, CA 90745
(562) 857-4300
[email protected]
http://www.autismadvocatesinactionsg.com

20 John Tracy Clinic
740 E. Wardlow Rd.

Long Beach, CA 90807
(562) 426-2257
www.jtc.org

Alma Family Services
121 Linden Ave.

Long Beach, CA 90802
(562) 624-8844
(323) 881-3799
www.almafamilyservices.org
Autism Society of America
Greater Long Beach/San Gabriel
Valley Chapter
8635 Greenleaf Ave., Unit B
Whittier, CA 90602
(562) 665-5496
www.greaterlongbeach-asa.org
Veterans Affairs Long Beach
Healthcare System
5901 E. 7th St.

Long Beach, CA 90822
Harbor Regional Center
Attn: Patricia Del Monico, Executive
Director
21231 Hawthorne Blvd.

Torrance, CA 90503
(310) 540-1711
(310) 543-0691
www.harborrc.org
[email protected]
Ability First
3770 E. Willow St.

Long Beach, CA 90815
(562) 426-6161
(626) 396-1010
(877) 768-4600
www.abilityfirst.org
[email protected]
Mental Health America of Los Angeles
200 Pine Ave., Suite 400
Long Beach, CA 90802
(562) 285-1330
www.mhala.org
National Alliance for the Mentally Ill
PO Box 91206
Long Beach, CA 90809
(562) 435-2264
Special Olympics Southern California
1600 Forbes Way, Suite 200
Long Beach, CA 90810
(562) 502-1100
www.sosc.org
[email protected]
Team of Advocates for Special Kids
Attn: Mario Haug, Executive Director
100 W. Cerritos Ave,
Anaheim, CA 92805
(866) 828-8275
(714) 533-8275
www.taskca.org
[email protected]
Childnet Youth and Family Services
4155 Outer Traffic Circle
Long Beach, CA 90804
(562) 498-5500
(562) 498-5501
www.childnet.net

Community Family Guidance Center
10929 South St., Suite 208B
Cerritos, CA 90703
(562) 865-6444
https://cfgcenter.com

21 Greater Los Angeles Agency on
Deafness, Inc.
2222 Laverna Ave.

Los Angeles, CA 90041
(323) 478-8000 (Voice/TTY)
(323) 550-4226 (TTY)
(323) 892-2225 (Videophone)
[email protected]

Los Angeles County Department of
Mental Health
150 W. 7th St.

San Pedro, CA 90731
(310) 519-6100
(310) 519-6218
U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Gardena Community Based Outpatient
Clinic
1149 W. 190
th St.

Gardena, CA 90248
(310) 851-4705

2025-2026 CDBG Proposed Project Summary Table
Draft Budget 3/18/2025
2025 Entitlement Grant (Estimated) Proposed Budget
Subtotal $ 660,108.00

Program Income PY 2024 (Received year-to-date, available) $ Program Income PY 2025 Estimated, 20% available for Admin.) $ Prior Year’s Funds (Reprogrammed Funds-Estimate $
Subtotal $ 660,108.00

Total 2025 Estimated Funds Available $ 660,108.00

Administration
(Limited to 20% of PY 2025 Grant + 20% of PY 2025 Program Income) = $132,021.6 + $0 = $132,021.60

Administrative Expenses $ 132,021.60

Administrative Total $ 132,021.60

Physical Development Activities

Neighborhood Pride Program

Capital Improvement Subtotal $ 429,070.20

Public Services
(Limited to 15% of PY 2025 Grant + 15% of PY 2024 Program Income) = $99,016.20 + $0 = $99,016.20

Fair Housing – Housing rights Center $ 34,977.00
Boys & Girls Club of Carson $ 40,000.00
Venice Family Clinic $ 20,000.00

Public Services Total $94, 977.00

Summary

Total 2025 Allocation $ 660,108.00

Project/Activity Name Requested
Allocation
Recommended
Allocation
Public Service FY 2025/26 $99,016.20 $99,016.20
Fair Housing - Fair Housing Foundation $34,627.00 $ 0 Fair Housing - Housing Rights Center $34,977.00 $34,977.00 Boys & Girls Club of Carson $40,000.00 $40,000.00
Venice Family Clinic $20,000.00 $20,000.00
Carson Hope Community Church $16,000.00 $ 0 Requested Totals = $145,604.00 $94,977.00
Balance = ($30,588.00) $4,039.00
CITY OF CARSON 701 East Carson Street
Report to Honorable Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 5:00 PM
DISCUSSION 46. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Dr. Arlington Rodgers, Director of Public Works PW Engineering Subject: FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 BUDGET WORKSHOP NO. 2 – CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CITYCOUNCIL) I. SUMMARY
This is the second planned Budget Workshop being presented to the City Council before it considers adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026 budget on June 17, 2025. The ﬁrst Budget Workshop took place on April 15, 2025, where staff presented detailed information on the City’s revenue streams and the anticipated FY 2025-2026 personnel expenditures and departmental operating expenditures.

Annually, the City adopts a Capital Improvement Program that outlines fund allocations for the upcoming ﬁscal year. This report includes the proposed FY 2025-20206 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) plan.

II. RECOMMENDATION
TAKE the following actions:

1. CONDUCT a workshop to review the draft Fiscal Year 2025-2026 CIP 5-Year Plan; and

2. PROVIDE direction to staff on which projects to include in the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 budget document.

III. ALTERNATIVES
TAKE another action deemed appropriate by City Council.

IV. BACKGROUND
The following summarizes the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Five-Year Plan for the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The CIP will guide the City in the planning and scheduling of infrastructure improvement projects over the next ﬁve years, from Fiscal Year 2025-2026 through Fiscal Year 2029-2030. The CIP represents funding to accommodate the City’s growing infrastructure needs based on deferred maintenance and projects required to stay at the level of service residents expect. For Fiscal Year 2025-2026, the Proposed Capital Improvement Program annual budget request is approximately $169 million. Included in the request are several large continuing CIP projects, such as the Carriage Crest Park Expansion and the Citywide Pavement program. The proposed amount would include roughly $69 million in reimbursable grants, $27 million funded through Special Revenue, $22 million from the 2024 Revenue Release Bond funds and $50 million from the general reserve fund. Each year, the City’s Public Works department goes through a process of working with each city department that may have a CIP project to determine the scope and description of what is being requested and/or required. During this process, a cost estimate and schedule is developed.

Projects proposed for the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 take into consideration potential sources of funding including grants and other potential ﬁnancing opportunities. Projects are evaluated and prioritized based on the protection of public health and safety, adherence to both regulatory and legal requirements, environmental beneﬁts, public support, and alignment with the Strategic Key Targets of the Mayor and City Council.

Funding Sources:

The City’s general revenue streams are insuﬃcient to fund all the infrastructure rehabilitation and new projects requested by City Council and expected by the public. Therefore, Public Works has been proactive in obtaining grants for Roadways and Bike Lanes and currently has over $69 million in grants from various agencies, including Caltrans and Metro. The Waste Division in Public Works has also been proactive and obtained numerous State grants for improving the City’s compliance related to waste management and recycling. However, Public Works is responsible for the design and construction of everything in the city that is considered a capital project. Therefore, Public Works continues to seek out grants for projects city-wide and assists other departments, primarily for parks, bike lanes and roadway projects so that it can leverage projects with non-General Funds.

The type and cost of the project generally determines the funding source. The City receives monies from the following funding sources for CIP projects:

Gas Tax
SB1 (State sales tax for road improvements)
Measure R (County sales tax for road improvements)
Measure M (County sales tax for road improvements)
CalRecycle (for recycling programs)
Development Impact Fees (City-imposed)
County Quimby funds
CBDG (Locally-allocated federal dollars)
Measure W (County parcel tax for stormwater improvements) OGALS (State funding for local, state, and nonproﬁt organization projects) 2024 Revenue Release Bonds
Public Works is focused on investing in capital projects that reduce maintenance and operating costs Fiscal Year 2025-2026. Proposed CIP Expenditures The largest capital funding investment for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 is in the category of Roadways. At approximately $57 million, the Roadways category represents 34% of all proposed projects. In the past, Roadways were funded by Regional programs such as Measure R and Measure M, as well as State and Federal funds.

The proposed FY 2025-2026 funding sources as well as the requested amounts by project type are illustrated in the tables below:

Funding Summary
FUNDING SOURCE   AMOUNT
General Fund $         50,000,000
Reimbursable Grants $         69,048,233
Special Revenue/Entitlement Funding $         27,916,857 Lease Revenue Bond $         22,436,294
Total FY 2025-26 CIP Estimate $       169,401,384
Project Categories
TYPE COUNT FY25-26 ESTIMATE PERCENTAGE
Bikeways 4 $              13,099,773 8%
Buildings 6 $              11,102,912 7%
Parks 13 $              48,368,876 29%
Roadways 18 $              57,533,901 34%
Stormwater 4 $                3,434,531 2%
Technology 1 $              25,000,000 15%
Traﬃc 7 $              10,660,583 6%
Trees 1 $                   200,808 0%

Grand Total 53 $ 169,401,384 100%
V. FISCAL IMPACT
The City Council's directives from this workshop will inform the drafting of the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 budget. The proposed FY 2025-2026 CIP plan is estimated at approximately $169.4 million, with approximately $69 million being funded by reimbursable grants, $27.9 million by special revenues, $22.4 million from the 2024 Lease Revenue Bond, and $50 million from the general reserve respectively.

A comprehensive exhibit accompanies this background document to provide detailed insights into the CIP plan.

VI. EXHIBITS

1. FY 2025-2026 CIP Plan
Prepared by: Dr. Arlington Rodgers Jr., Public Works Director

Attachments
FY 25-26 CIP Attachment
FY2025-26 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PHASE PROJ # TYPE PROJECT NAME DESCRIPTION Total Project Estimate FY25-26 Estimate FY26-27 Estimate FY27-28 Estimate FY28-29 Estimate FY29-30 Estimate 1 Construction PW0675 Roadways Sepulveda Blvd -Widening The project involves widening and improvement of the roadway and bridge along Sepulveda Blvd to provide three lanes of traffic in both directions, construction of new sidewalk, relocation of existing electrical poles, and modification of existing traffic 25,000,000$ 12,409,061$ 13,102,001$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1368 Parks **Carriage Crest Park Expansion and Improvement Project Refurbish main building facility and develop the additional 10 acres leased from Sanitation District. The project will include extending existing parking lot, adding new parking lot, Dog park, and remote restroom on South East end of property. New playgr 23,468,092$ 22,058,539$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1393-4 Roadways Main Street Improvement from Carson St to Victoria Citywide Annual Overlay Program - Main Street - Carson to Victoria. The project includes grinding existing asphalt pavement and overlay with ARHM to extend life of the pavement. 1 3,600,000$ 239,202$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1393-5
Roadways
Avalon Street Reconstruction
Citywide Annual Overlay Program - - Avalon Blvd - 223rd to Lomita. The project includes asphalt pavement overlay, concrete reconstruction, tree removal and replacement, repair of damage sidewalk, driveway approaches, curbs and gutter, access ramps. (Combine PW1620, 1393-5, 1411-5)
7,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1411-4
Roadways
Main Street Concrete Improvement from Carson St to Victoria Annual concrete program - Main Street: Carson to Victoria. Concrete reconstruction, tree removal and replacement, repair of damage sidewalk, driveway approaches, curbs and gutter, access ramps to meet the requirements of ADA. 500,000$ 33,507$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1411-5
Roadways
Annual Concrete Program
Citywide Concrete Program - - Avalon Blvd - 223rd to South of Sepulveda. The project includes asphalt pavement overlay, concrete reconstruction, tree removal and replacement, repair of damage sidewalk, driveway approaches, curbs and gutter, access ramps. (Combine PW1620, 1393-5, 1411-5)
3,000,000$ -$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1515 Stormwater Carson Stormwater Capture Facility at Carriage Crest Park Compliance Project - Stormwater chambers under baseball field to divert stormwater into LA County Sanitation District's Regional & Water Pollution Control Plant 22,110,713$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1610 Parks **Foisia Park Design and Construction Design - Various upgrades to park facility. Competitive Grant and the award of funding will be available withing the next 3-4 months. Prop 68 1 12,757,062$ 10,883,933$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1630 Parks **Anderson Park Electrical Panel- Design and Construction Replace and upgrade main electrical switch gear and lighting control panel. (Combined PW1630 & PW1671) 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1632 Buildings Community Center Coiling Wall & Seismic Analysis Repair coiling wall at Community Center Main Hall - Seismic Analysis 1,484,000$ 1,247,071$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1636 Parks **Mills Park Renovations
Install new shade structure over picnic shelters and outdoor exercise equipment, Construct Unisex restrooms (pre-fabrication) for public use, monument sign, wading pool demo - Per Capita Grant 3,445,254$ 3,483,335$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1648 Parks *Athletic Field and walking path replacement Lighting -LED Upgrade athletic field lights to central control lighting system and convert the existing lights to LED - All Parks 3,387,951$ 3,388,069$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1649 Traffic Traffic Signal Intersection Upgrades - Avalon Blvd at Victoria, Main St at Sepulveda, Main St at 223rd St, and Figueroa St at Torrance BlvdTraffic Signal Upgrades at 4 Intersections - Avalon Blvd at Victoria, Main St at Sepulveda, Main St and 223rd St, Figueroa St at Torrance Blvd) 3,529,123$ 3,330,583$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1657
Traffic
*Traffic Signal Upgrades (M312.41 and M312.46) - Figueroa St at 234th St, Figueroa St at 223rd St, Figueroa St at Victoria St/190th St, Main St at 220th St, Main St at Albertoni St, and Main St at Victoria St Traffic Signal Upgrades at 6 Intersections - Figueroa St at 234th St, Figueroa St at 223rd St, Figueroa St at Victoria St/190th St, Main St at 220th St, Main St at Albertoni St, and Main St at Victoria St
Pending MTA's funding agreement for construction 6,000,000$ 3,730,000$ 2,270,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1667 Traffic *Upgrade existing traffic signal - Avalon Bl at Gardena Bl Traffic Signal Upgrade to include addition of left turn phase on north and south bound direction of Avalon Blvd. 500,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1674 Safety **Security Cameras Install tamper proof security cameras at parks. Work on broadband requirements. (Johnson Contols) 7,351,975$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1 Construction PW1676 Stormwater City of Carson Stormwater Green Street Engineering, Design & Implementation (Gardena & Main Street & Avalon) Compliance to the RWQCB stormwater - Includes engineered systems, permeable pavements & nature-based systems. The goal is to comply with regulations. 3,000,000$ 2,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Page 1 of 7 ends

Carson City CouncilMay 6, 2025

Carson City Council
May 6, 2025