Clovis City Council
December 16, 2024

1770
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th AWSC
4: Minnewawa Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour
Intersection Delay, s/veh 214.6
Intersection LOS F
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4* 4^ 4*
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 257 122 15 287 187 172 351 31 194 223 8 Future Vol, veh/h 6 257 122 15 287 187 172 351 31 194 223 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 6 276 131 16 309 201 185 377 33 209 240 9
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
approach . EB . ^urnir.-WB 'i NB SB " ~,:m
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 118.7 218.1 312.6 169.5

HCMLOS F F F F
Une .. ' NBLnl EBLn1 WBLnl SBLnl
Vol Left, % 31% 2% 3% 46%
VolThru,% 63% 67% 59% 52%
Vol Right, % 6% 32% 38% 2%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 554 385 489 425
LTVol 172 6 15 194
Through Vol 351 257 287 223
RTVol 31 122 187 8
Lane Flow Rate 596 414 526 457
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of UtII (X) 1.598 1,086 1.369 1.235
Departure Headway (Hd) 11.858 13.342 12.149 13.137
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 310 277 305 279
Service Time 9.858 11.342 10.149 11.137
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.923 1.495 1.725 1.638
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 312.6 118.7 218.1 169.5
HCM Lane LOS F F F F
HCM 95th-tile Q 29 12 20.9 16
ISA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1771
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th TWSC
5: Minnewawa Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour
. . . . - ^ .. .

Int Delay, s/veh 146
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4^ 4* 4* 4*
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 98 91 15 96 2 88 616 8 1 436 38
Future Vol. veh/h 38 98 91 15 96 2 88 616 8 1 436 38
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -None - -None - -
None - -None
Storage Length ■ - - - - - - - - - - -
Veh In Median Storage, # - 0
- -
0 - -
0 - -
0 -
Grade, %
-
0 - -
0 - -
0 - -
0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 92 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3
Mvmt Flow 40 103 96 16 101 2 93 648 8 1 474 40
Minor2 Minorl
Conflicting Flow All 1380 1338 494 1365 1354
Stage 1 496 496 -
838 838
Stage 2 884 842 -
528 516
Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 -

6.12 5.52
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 -

6.12 5.52
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018
PotCap-1 Maneuver 122 153 575 124 150
Stage 1 556 545 -
361 382
Stage 2 340 380 -
534 534
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver -25 131 575 22 129
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver -25 131 -
22 129
Stage 1 555 544 -
311 329
Stage 2 202 327 -
360 533
653 514

6.22 4.12
468 1052
0 657 0 0

4.13 2.227
926
926
Approach EB %B- M
HCM Control Delay, $/?97.82

HCM LOS F
$381.32
F

1.08 0.02
NBT NBREBLnlWBLnl SBL SBt'
Capacity (veh/h) 222
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.088
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8
HCM Lane LOS A
HCM 95th %tlle Q{veh) 0.3
- 94 78
- 2.547 1.522
■$797.8$ 381.3
F F
- 22.2 9.7
4 0.001

8.9 A
0 Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1772
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project 6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue Near Term wp_pm Peak Hour ^ ^ t A V i V
Movemenbs'l^^^^^H ymm *ir. :VilBL ,J4BT mR
Lane Configurations ft f f f + f f f
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 189 387 259 31 319 240 281 643 52 159 475 152 Future Volume (veh/h) 189 387 259 31 319 240 281 643 52 159 475 152 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 199 407 273 33 336 253 296 677 55 167 500 160 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 230 1018 454 115 415 352 324 678 574 197 542 460 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.22 0.22 0.18 0.36 0.36 0.11 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3610 1610 1810 1900 1610 1781 1870 1585 1767 1856 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 199 407 273 33 336 253 296 677 55 167 500 160 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1610 1810 1900 1610 1781 1870 1585 1767 1856 1572 Q Serve{gis}. s 11.9 10.1 16.2 1.9 18.6 16.1 18.0 40.0 2.5 10.3 28.9 8.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.9 10.1 16.2 1.9 18.6 16.1 18.0 40.0 2.5 10.3 28.9 8.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 230 1018 454 115 415 352 324 678 574 197 542 460 V/C Ratio(X) 0.87 0.40 0.60 0.29 0.81 0.72 0.91 1.00 0.10 0.85 0.92 0.35 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 343 1109 495 343 584 495 338 678 574 335 570 483 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.4 32.1 34.3 49.4 41.1 40.1 44.4 35.3 23.3 48.2 37.9 30.9 incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.9 0.4 2.4 0.5 7.7 4.7 27.1 34.2 0.1 3.9 20,5 0.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.8 4.2 6.3 0.9 9.1 6.5 10.1 23.5 0.9 4.7 16.0 3.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 57.3 32.5 36.7 50.0 48.7 44.8 71.5 69.5 23.4 52.1 58.5 31.5 LnGrp LOS E C D D D D E E C D E C
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
879

39.4 D
622

47.2 D
1028

67.6 E
827

52.0 D
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.1 38.3 18.0 30.2 16.3 46.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21,0 34.0 21.0 34.0 21.0 34.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1),s 20.0 30.9 13.9 20.6 12.3 42.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 1.5 0.1 3.6 0.1 0.0

11.0 37.2

4.0 6.0

21.0 34.0

3.9 18.2

0.0 4.5
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh
HCM 7th LOS

52.6 D
ISA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report
Pages
1773
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th TWSC
7: Project Driveway 1 & Peach Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations V 4
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 33 91 0 16 97
Future Vol, veh/h 0 33 91 0 16 97
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized -None -None -
None
Storage Length 0
- - - - -
Veh In Median Storage, # 0
-
0 - -
0 Grade, % 0
-
0 - -
0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 36 99 0 17 105
Maldf/Mlnor Minorl
Conflicting Flow All 239 99
Stage 1 99 -
Stage 2 140 -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 -
Critical Hdvi/y Stg 2 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 749 957
Stage 1 925 -
Stage 2 887 -
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 740 957
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 740 -
Stage 1 925 -
Stage 2 876 -
0 99
- 4.12
- 2.218
- 1494
- 1494
;SH wmmmmmmimt
HCM Control Delay, s/v 8.91 0 1.05

HCM LOS A
ItH^RVi/BLinl!
Capacity (veh/h) - 957 255
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.037 0.012
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - 8.9 7.4 0
HCM Lane LOS A A A
HCM 95th %tileQ(veh) - 0.1 0
LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1774
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th TWSC
8: Project Driveway 2 & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
EBT- m WBt WBT''Hm
Lane Configurations t f
Traffic Vol, veh/h 343 16 0 358 0 14
Future Vol, veh/h 343 16 0 358 0 14
Conflicting Reds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized -None -None -None
Storage Length - - - - -
0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - -
0 0
-
Grade, % 0
- -
0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 373 17 0 389 0 15
Silaior/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl
Conflicting Flow All 0 0
-
382
Stage 1
- • -
Stage 2 ■ • -
Critical Hdwy - -

6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1
- • -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
- • -
Follow-up Hdwy - -

3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 666
Stage 1 0 0
-
Stage 2 0 0
-
Platoon blocked, %
-
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - .. 666
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -
Stage 1
- •
Stage 2 - • -
HCM Control Delay, s/v

HCM LOS
J/llnor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLnl
Capacity (veh/h) 666
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.5
HCM Lane LOS B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1

EBT EBR WBT
ISA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1775
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th TWSC
9: Project Driveway 3 & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour
Int Delay, s/veh
Movement
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h
Future Vol, veh/h
Conflicting Peds, #/hr
Sign Control
RT Channelized
Storage Length
Veh in Median Storage
Grade, %
Peak Hour Factor
Heavy Vehicles, %
Mvmt Flow
1 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
t f
326 31 71 358 0 19
326 31 71 358 0 19
0 0 0 0 0 0
Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
-
None -None -None
- -
100 - -
0 U 0
- -
0 0 -
0 - -
0 0
-
92 92 92 92 92 92
2 2 2 2 2 2
354 34 77 389 0 21
liLi!
nor r
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
Stage 2
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
0 388 0

4.12 2.218
1170
- 1170
371

6.22 - 3.318
0 675
0 0
- 675
Approach - 7^1 si-' HB'
HCM Control Delay, s/v

HCM LOS
Minor Lane/Malor Mvmt;

1.37 10.5
B
Capacity (veh/h) 675 - 1170
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 - 0.066
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.5 - 8.3
HCM Lane LOS B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.2
::Vn
LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1776
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th TWSC
10: Project Driveway 4 & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
' EBT EBr
Lane Configurations f f f
Traffic Voi, veh/h 321 24 0 429 0 28
Future Voi, veh/h 321 24 0 429 0 28
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized -
None -None -None
Storage Length - - - - -
0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0
- -
0 0
-
Grade, % 0
- -
0 0
-
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 349 26 0 466 0 30
t\/lajor/Minor Majori Major2 Minorl
Conflicting Flow Aii
Stage 1
Stage 2
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
Approach ef
362
- 3.3 8
0 683
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 10.52

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl EBT EBR WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 683 .

HCM Lane V/G Ratio 0.045 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.5 . . .

HCM Lane LOS B
-
HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 -
ISA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1777
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project 4: Minnewawa Avenue & Behymer Avenue Existing YearWP^AM Peak Hour MIT >
>
V t A
V 1 V
Movemeh^MHHIHI mm EBB;, «r- :»■' N3L NET nbbh
Lane Configurations 4* 4* 4* 4*
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 8 162 125 25 222 253 85 240 19 175 207 4 Future Volume (veh/h) 8 162 125 25 222 253 85 240 19 175 207 4 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-BIke Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1885 1885 1885 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Ad] Fiow Rate, veh/h 8 167 129 26 229 261 88 261 20 180 213 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 123 377 282 135 312 334 237 443 31 370 313 5 Arrive On Green 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 Sat Fiow, veh/h 14 971 726 38 803 861 291 1363 95 624 964 16 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 304 0 0 516 0 0 369 0 0 397 0 0
Grp Sat Fiow(s),veh/h/in 1710 0 0 1703 0 0 1749 0 0 1604 0 0 Q Serve{g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Ciear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.03 0.42 0.05 0.51 0.24 0.05 0.45 0.01
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 781 0 0 781 0 0 710 0 0 688 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1094 0 0 1092 0 0 1111 0 0 1038 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1,00 0,00 0,00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.1 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Deiay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %iie BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Deiay(d), s/veh 7.4 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 304 516 369 397
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.4 9.3 9.5 9.9
Approach LOS A A A A
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0
Max QCiear Time (g_c+l1),s 7.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.7
jjitersectlonSummary
HCM 7th Controi Delay, s/veh
HCM 7th LOS

9.2 A

16.7 4.5

18.0 6.1

1.3 14.7

4.5 18.0

8.3 1.9

16.7 4.5

18.0 10.2

1.9 ISA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1778
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project 4: Minnewawa Avenue & Behymer Avenue Existing Year WP_PM Peak Hour MIT > > A t A
V i V
Moyement EBL . EBR-:.WVYDL. .i/m^4*- NBT kIDD ~
Lane Configurations 4* 4^ 4* 4^
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 5 197 82 15 233 179 127 259 30 187 168 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 5 197 82 15 233 179 127 259 30 187 168 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 100 100 100 100 100 100
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/in 1870 1870 1870 1900 1900 1900 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 212 88 16 251 192 137 278 32 201 181 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 118 446 182 125 354 261 296 429 45 411 293 11 Arrive On Green 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 8 1251 511 24 994 732 411 1185 123 663 809 31 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 305 0 0 459 0 0 447 0 0 390 0 0
Grp Sat Fiow(s),veh/h/ln 1770 0 0 1751 0 0 1719 0 0 1503 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Ciear(g_c), s 4.3 0.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.02 0.29 0.03 0.42 0.31 0.07 0.52 0.02
Lane Grp Cap(c). veh/h 745 0 0 740 0 0 770 0 0 715 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a). veh/h 1300 0 0 1287 0 0 1655 0 0 1465 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 100 100 100 100 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 100 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.0 0.0 0.0 8.9 0.0 0.0 8.6 0.0 0.0 8.5 0.0 0.0 incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay{d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %iie BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 0.0 15 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 15 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Deiay(d), s/veh 8.4 0.0 0.0 9.8 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 305 459 447 390
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.4 9.8 9.3 9.1
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s
Change Period (Y+Rc), s
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s
Max Q Clear Time {g_c+l1), s
Green ExtTime {p_c), s

16.1 15.9 16.1 15.9

4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5

29.5 21.5 29.5 21.5

8.6 6.3 8.4 9.2

3.0 15 2.8 2.2
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh
HCM 7th LOS

9.2 A
ISA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1779
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7thAWSC
3: Peach Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP AM Peak Hour MIT
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 17
intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4^
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 270 29 15 490 2 79 30 15 7 24 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 270 29 15 490 2 79 30 15 7 24 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 3 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 293 32 16 533 2 86 33 16 8 26 0
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach "EB WB mmmi NB SB _
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 12.6 21.5 11.1 9.9
HCM LOS B C B A -mi
Lane NBLnl EBLnl WBLnl SBLnl
Vol Left. % 64% 0% 3% 23%
Vol Thru, % 24% 90% 97% 77%
Vol Right, % 12% 10% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 124 299 507 31
LTVoi 79 0 15 7
Through Voi 30 270 490 24
RTVoi 15 29 2 0
Lane Flow Rate 135 325 551 34
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util {X) 0.231 0.465 0.755 0.06
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.158 5.152 4.934 6.428
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 582 699 738 555
Service Time 4.207 3.188 2.934 4.488
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.232 0.465 0.747 0.061
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 11.1 12.6 21.5 9.9
HCM Lane LOS B B C A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.9 2.5 7 0.2
LSA
08/10/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1780
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project Near Term WP AM Peak Hour MIT
>
> A t V i V
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4* 4* h
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 9 184 149 25 280 258 121 275 19 188 282 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 9 184 149 25 280 258 121 275 19 188 282 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1885 1885 1885 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 9 190 154 26 289 266 125 284 20 194 291 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 77 367 288 87 341 300 160 373 26 244 478 11
Arrive On Green 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 14 962 755 36 894 785 1767 1713 121 1767 1804 43 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 353 0 0 581 0 0 125 0 304 194 0 298 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1730 0 0 1715 0 0 1767 0 1834 1767 0 1848 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 8.0 5.5 0.0 7.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.2 0.0 0.0 16.2 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 8.0 5.5 0.0 7.3 Prop In Lane 0.03 0.44 0.04 0.46 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.02
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 732 0 0 728 0 0 160 0 399 244 0 489 V/C Ratlo(X) 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.76 0.80 0.00 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 826 0 0 822 0 0 258 0 696 327 0 773 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fllter(l) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.4 0.0 0.0 14.8 0.0 0.0 22.9 0.0 18.9 21.5 0.0 16.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 3.0 9.5 0.0 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr£.5 0.0 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 1.7 0,0 3.4 2.7 0.0 2.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 12.9 0.0 0.0 19.8 0.0 0.0 30.8 0.0 21.9 30.9 0.0 17,8 LnGrp LOS B B C C C B
Approach Vol. veh/h 353
Approach Delay, s/veh 12.9
Approach LOS B
581

19.8 8
429

24.5 C
492

23.0 C
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), t1.6 15.7 24.1 9.2 18.1 24.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax|.5 19.5 22.5 7.5 21.5 22.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1^,5 10.0 10.2 5.6 9.3 18.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0,1 1.2 1.6 0.1 1.3 1.4
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh
HCM 7th LOS

20.4 C
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1781
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project 5: Minnewawa Avenue & Perrin Avenue NearTerm WP_AM Peak Hour MIT >
Movement - OEBL :EBT EBR WBL
V ^ t V i V
WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBI^
Lane Configurations 1^
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 34 69 67 8 75 2 61 427 14 2 564 34 Future Volume (veh/h) 34 69 67 8 75 2 61 427 14 2 564 34 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ''""Mi Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 37 75 73 9 82 2 66 464 15 2 613 37 i Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 . I
Cap, veh/h 145 128 108 112 281 6 115 886 29 5 751 45
Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.43 0.43 -.j Sat Flow, veh/h 224 780 654 85 1707 39 1767 1787 58 1767 1732 105 Grp Volume{v), veh/h 185 0 0 93 0 0 66 0 479 2 0 650
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1658 0 0 1831 0 0 1767 0 1845 1767 0 1837 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 12.4 - 'iSlHi Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0,0 1.5 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 12.4 Prop In Lane 0.20 0.39 0.10 0.02 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.06
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 380 0 0 400 0 0 115 0 915 5 0 796 V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.52 0.41 0.00 0.82 Avail Cap{c_a), veh/h 846 0 0 910 0 0 225 0 1078 221 0 1068 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fllter(l) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.7 0.0 0.0 14.7 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 6.9 19.9 0.0 9.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.5 47.6 0.0 3.7 Initial Q Delay(d3). s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/lnl.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.9 0.1 0.0 4.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 16.6 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 22.7 0.0 7.3 67.5 0.0 13.6 LnGrp LOS B B C A E B - i
Approach Vol, veh/h 185 93 545 652
Approach Delay, s/veh 16.6 15.0 9.2 13.8
Approach LOS B B A B
|lmer-/^qhed Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 ■
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s4.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gma>^9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1^,Cfc Green Ext Time {p_c), s 0.0
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh
HCM 7th LOS

24.4 4.5

23.4 9.1

2.6 11.1

4.5 18.1

6.1 0.8

7.1 4.5

5.1 3.5

0.0 21.9

4.5 23.3

14.4 2.9

11.1 4.5

18.1 3.8

0.3 12.5
B
■s
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1782
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th AWSC
3: Peach Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour MIT
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 17.3
Intersection LOS C
i|5lovemenr " wr--mr"SBT""W" BbI
Lane Configurations 4* 4* 4* 4*
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 422 49 27 379 7 76 39 20 2 39 1
Future Vol, veh/h 1 422 49 27 379 7 76 39 20 2 39 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 1 449 52 29 403 7 81 41 21 2 41 1
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
||\pproach WB 1
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 > 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 19.8 17 11.6 10.3
HCM LOS C 0 B B, . MM■1
lane NBLnl EBLnl WBLn1 SSLni
Vol Left, % 56% 0% 7% 5%
Vol Thru, % 29% 89% 92% 93%
Vol Right, % 15% 10% 2% 2%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 135 472 413 42
LTVol 78 1 27 2
Through Vol 39 422 379 39
RTVol 20 49 7 1
Lane Flow Rate 144 502 439 45
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of UtII (X) 0.253 0.712 0.636 0.082
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.345 5.108 5.213 6.617
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 564 708 690 538
Service Time 4.406 3.149 3.256 4.694
HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.255 0.709 0.636 0.084
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 11.6 19.8 17 10.3
HCM Lane LOS B C 0 B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1 6 4.6 0.3
ISA
08/10/2024
Synctiro 12 Report

1783
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project Near Term WP PM Peak Hour MIT
> <
-
V t A V \ V
r^EBT. EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL ,NBT ;NBii. S.BL m- Mm
4* \ V
257 122 15 287 187 172 351 31 194 223 8
257 122 15 287 187 172 351 31 194 223 8
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
No No No No
1870 1870 1900 1900 1900 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856
276 131 16 309 201 185 377 33 209 240 9

0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 3 3 3
405 189 75 358 226 233 460 40 260 510 19

0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.15 0.29 0.29
1206 564 21 1067 673 1781 1695 148 1767 1777 67
0 0 526 0 0 185 0 410 209 0 249
0 0 1761 0 0 1781 0 1844 1767 0 1844

0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 11.4 6.3 0.0 6.1

0.0 0.0 15.4 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 11.4 6.3 0.0 6.1

0.32 0.03 0.38 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.04
0 0 659 0 0 233 0 500 260 0 529

0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.82 0.81 0.00 0.47
0 0 726 0 0 315 0 690 339 0 717

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00

0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00

0.0 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 18.7 22.6 0.0 16.1

0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0,0 9.5 0.0 5.6 10.2 0.0 0.7

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 5.1 3.1 0.0 2.4
I

0.0 0.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 32.6 0.0 24.3 32.9 0.0 16.7

C C C C B
413 526 595 458

17.2 23.0 26.9 24.1

B C C C
4 6

19.4 22.9 11.7 20.2 22.9

4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5

20.5 20.5 9.7 21.3 20.5

13.4 13.1 7.5 8.1 17.4

1.4 1.4 0.1 1.1 0.9
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 6
Future Volume (veh/h) 6
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00
Ped-BikeAd](Aj)bT) 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00
Work Zone On Approach
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.93
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2
Cap, veh/h 69
Arrive On Green 0.34
Sat Fiow, veh/h 7
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 413
Grp Sat Fiow(s),veh/h/ln1777
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0
Cycle Q Ciear(g_c), s 11.1
Prop In Lane 0.01
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 663
V/C Ratio(X) 0.62
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 730
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00
Upstream Filter(l) 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 15.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.4
Initial Q Deiay{d3), s/veh 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.9
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 17.2
LnGrp LOS B
►•I
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), t2.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmalc^lS
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l19,S
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1
to!ime:eti9,n?g.urom.^r.

HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh
HCM 7th LOS

23.2 0
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1784
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project 5: Minnewawa Avenue & Perrin Avenue Near Term wp_pm Peak Hour MIT - ^ ^
rlBL EBT EBRWBL _ mivWflRNBL _ NBT
t A
J^BR; SBL
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 38 98 91 15 96 2 88 616 8 1 436 38 Future Volume (veh/h) 38 98 91 15 96 2 88 616 8 1 436 38 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 40 103 96 16 101 2 93 648 9 1 459 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 -.-.-CSdKtf
Cap, veh/h 144 168 137 129 340 6 145 827 11 5 622 54
Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 177 822 671 119 1666 31 1781 1840 26 1767 1683 147 Grp Volume{v), veh/h 239 0 0 119 0 0 93 0 657 1 0 499
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1670 0 0 1816 0 0 1781 0 1866 1767 0 1829 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 11.7 0.0 0.0 9.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 11.7 0.0 0.0 9.2 Prop In Lane 0.17 0.40 0.13 0.02 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 448 0 0 475 0 0 145 0 839 5 0 676 V/C Ratlo(X) 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.78 0.22 0.00 0.74 Avail Cap{c_a), veh/h 878 0 0 931 0 0 228 0 1322 226 0 1296 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.4 0.0 0.0 13.2 0.0 0.0 17.4 0.0 9.1 19.5 0.0 10.7 incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 1.6 23.0 0.0 1.6 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/lnl.7 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 3.0 Unslg. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 15.4 0.0 0.0 13.5 0.0 0.0 22.1 0.0 10.8 42.4 0.0 12.3 LnGrp LOS B B C B D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 239 119 750 500
Approach Delay, s/veh 15.4 13.5 12.2 12.3
Approach LOS B B B B
Irimer - Assigned Phs
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s4,6 22.1 12.5 7.7 19.0 12.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax^S 27.7 18.3 5.0 27.7 18.3
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l13,ft 13.7 7.1 4.0 11.2 4.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.9 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.5
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh
HCM 7th LOS

12.8 B
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1785
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Willow Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour MIT
>
> <
1i
<
VVBR^ -WBL
t
NET NBRV
:SBL SET"
V
TSBR
Lane Configurations t f f f n r r
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 84 223 267 547 293 337 193 784 265 150 913 57 Future Volume (veh/h) 84 223 267 547 293 337 193 784 265 150 913 57 Initial Q (Ob), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-BIke Adj(Aj3bT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 87 230 275 564 302 347 199 808 273 155 941 59 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 123 366 311 615 544 461 223 1592 777 184 1473 457 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.29 0.29 0.13 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 1856 1572 3456 1870 1585 1781 5106 1585 1767 5066 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 87 230 275 564 302 347 199 808 273 155 941 59 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1767 1856 1572 1728 1870 1585 1781 1702 1585 1767 1689 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 12.0 18.1 17.0 14.5 21.1 11.7 13.7 11.3 9.1 17.2 2.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 12.0 18.1 17.0 14.5 21.1 11.7 13.7 11.3 9.1 17.2 2.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 123 366 311 615 544 461 223 1592 777 184 1473 457 V/C Ratlo(X) 0.71 0.63 0.89 0.92 0.56 0.75 0.89 0.51 0.35 0.84 0.64 0.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 147 411 348 615 564 478 223 1761 829 231 1776 551 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fllter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.3 39.0 41.4 42.8 31.8 34.2 45.7 29.9 16.7 46.7 32.8 27.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.4 2.8 21.7 18.3 2.1 8.0 32.0 0.8 0.9 16.4 1.5 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %lle BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 5.6 8.6 8.6 6.6 8.8 7.1 5.7 4.0 4.8 7.2 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 56.7 41.8 63.1 61.1 33.9 42.1 77.7 30.7 17.6 63.1 34.3 28.1 LnGrp LOS E D E E C D E C B E C c
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
592

53.9 D
1213

48.9 D
1280

35.2 D
1155

37.9 D
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.6 36.6 13.6 37.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.3 5.7 6.2 6.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.3 37.2 8.8 32.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1),s 13.7 19.2 7.1 23.1
Green Ext Time {p_c). s 0.0 11.7 0.0 3.7
T •'8'

16.4 5.3

13.9 11.1

0.1 38.8

5.7 36.6

15.7 13.2

23.5 4.6

18.9 19.0

0.0 27.5

6.5 23.5

20.1 0.9
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh
HCM 7th LOS

42.5 D
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1786
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Willow Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour MIT
> > <V t A
V
■ iS-Eifei
V
Lane Configurations f f V\ Mf r f
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 278 126 209 197 200 76 160 861 134 45 1252 449 Future Volume (veh/h) 278 126 209 197 200 76 160 861 134 45 1252 449 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flovi/, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1900 1900 1900 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 287 130 215 203 206 78 165 888 138 46 1291 463 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 337 357 302 249 264 223 270 1979 614 101 1908 592 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.39 0.39 0.06 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1810 1900 1610 3456 5106 1585 1767 5066 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 287 130 215 203 206 78 165 888 138 46 1291 463 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1810 1900 1610 1728 1702 1585 1767 1689 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.8 6.1 12.9 11.0 10.6 4.4 4.7 13.1 5.9 2.6 21.6 26.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.8 6.1 12.9 11.0 10.6 4.4 4.7 13.1 5.9 2.6 21.6 26.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 337 357 302 249 264 223 270 1979 614 101 1908 592 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.36 0.71 0.82 0.78 0.35 0.61 0.45 0.22 0.45 0.68 0.78 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 469 443 375 393 362 307 276 1979 614 152 1949 605 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.7 35.7 38.4 42.5 42.2 39.5 45.2 23.0 20.8 46.2 26.4 27.9 Incr Delay {d2), s/veh 16.7 1.7 9.0 16.4 14.0 2.6 2.7 0.5 0,6 1.2 1.6 8.8 Initial Q Delay{d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.2 2.9 5.6 6.0 6.0 1.9 2.1 5.2 2.2 1.2 8.7 10.8 Unslg. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay{d), s/veh 56.4 37.4 47.4 58.8 56.1 42.1 47.9 23.5 21.4 47.4 28.0 36.7 LnGrp LOS E D D E E D D C C D C D
Approach Vol, veh/h 632 487 1191 1800
Approach Delay, s/veh 49.4 55.0 26.7 30.8
Approach LOS D E C C
Phs - 6 ■ ■ 7
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.2 43.9 24.5 19.8 12.1 45.0 19.2 25.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.3 5.7 5.3 5.7 6.3 5.7 5.3 5.7 Max Green Setting {Gmax), s 8.1 39.0 26.7 19.3 8.7 37.3 22.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1),s 6.7 28.4 17.8 12.6 4.6 15.1 13.0 14.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 9.8 1.4 1.4 0.0 13.8 0.9 2.0 jhtlrsection
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 35.3
HCM 7th LOS D
LSA
10/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1787
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Sumnnary
3: Peach Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour MIT
EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL.
t A
NBTiiViiNBR,
V \ V
SBL ^SB7^«-:SBi
Lane Configurations 4* 4^ 4*
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 312 60 45 964 7 70 56 36 36 47 1 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 312 60 45 964 7 70 56 36 36 47 1 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-BIke Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -^4Hi Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1885 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 339 65 49 1048 8 76 61 39 39 51 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 0 1040 199 100 1226 9 183 101 54 172 183 3
Arrive On Green 0.00 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1513 290 45 1783 13 602 686 367 527 1235 20 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 404 1105 0 0 176 0 0 91 0 0
Grp Sat Flow{s),veh/h/ln 0 0 1803 1842 0 0 1654 0 0 1782 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 4.9 8.7 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 4.9 25.1 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.16 0.04 0.01 0.43 0.22 0.43 0.01 IMIHI Lane Grp Cap{c), veh/h 0 0 1240 1335 0 0 339 0 0 358 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 0 1734 1831 0 0 640 0 0 662 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0,00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 3.4 6.5 0.0 0.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 20.8 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.2 2.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay{d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/lrf).0 0.0 0.8 4.7 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh - ^
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 3.6 8.9 0.0 0.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 21.2 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 404 1105 176 91
Approach Delay, s/veh 3.6 8.9 23.3 21.2
Approach LOS A A C C
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.6 42.0 12.6 42.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 52.5 18.5 52.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 7.4 6.9 4.3 27.1
Green Ext Time {p_c), s 0.7 2.6 0.3 10.5
IMIt^-gctioh Summary'
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 9.7
HCM 7th LOS A
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1788
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Minnewawa Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour MIT
> < < ^ t A V i V
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + f t f t f
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 16 259 181 63 525 279 187 317 35 250 544 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 16 259 181 63 525 279 187 317 35 250 544 24 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Red-Bike Adj{A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flovi^, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1885 1885 1885 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Ad] Flow Rate, veh/h 16 267 187 65 541 288 193 327 36 258 561 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 153 641 543 322 651 552 335 640 542 524 655 29 Arrive On Green 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.34 0.34 0.12 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 656 1856 1572 944 1885 1598 1767 1856 1572 1767 1763 79 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 267 187 65 541 288 193 327 36 258 0 586 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 656 1856 1572 944 1885 1598 1767 1856 1572 1767 0 1841 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 8.0 6.4 4.1 19.1 10.4 5.0 10.2 1.1 6.6 0.0 21.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 20.7 8.0 6.4 12.1 19.1 10.4 5.0 10.2 1.1 6.6 0.0 21.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 153 641 543 322 651 552 335 640 542 524 0 684 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.42 0.34 0.20 0.83 0.52 0.58 0.51 0.07 0.49 0.00 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 248 909 771 458 924 783 425 920 779 675 0 1025 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter{l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.3 18.1 17.6 22.7 21.8 18.9 16.0 18.9 15.9 12.9 0.0 21.0 Incr Delay {d2), s/veh 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 4.5 0.8 1.6 0.6 0.1 0.7 0.0 4.8 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/l[€.3 3.1 2.1 0.9 8.1 3.5 1.9 4.2 0.4 2.4 0.0 9.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay{d), s/veh 31.6 18.6 18.0 23.0 26.3 19.7 17.6 19.5 16.0 13.7 0.0 25.8 LnGrp LOS C B B C C B B B B B C
Approach Vol, veh/h 470 894 556 844
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.8 23.9 18.6 22.1
Approach LOS B C B C
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), t3.4 29.5 29.5 11.5 31.4 29.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmak5(.t 35.9 35.5 10.7 40.3 35.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1?,& 12.2 22.7 7.0 23.2 21.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 2.1 1.8 0.2 3.7 3.9
htersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 21.4
HCM 7th LOS C
ISA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1789
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Minnewawa Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour MIT
>
EBR: WBL- WBT
^ A

WBR- MBL
t
NBXfJ
V \
Lane Configurations +1+
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 85 129 121 22 144 4 96 533 18 3 990 140 Future Volume (veh/h) 85 129 121 22 144 4 96 533 18 3 990 140 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mm
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ■-■mm Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 92 140 132 24 157 4 104 579 20 3 1076 152 mm Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 - m
Cap, veh/h 118 172 162 48 281 7 154 1505 52 133 1305 184 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.09 0.43 0.43 0.08 0.42 0.42 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 885 835 1781 1816 46 1767 3477 120 1767 3102 437 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 92 0 272 24 0 161 104 293 306 3 611 617 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1720 1781 0 1862 1767 1763 1834 1767 1763 1777 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 0.0 10.1 0.9 0.0 5.3 3.8 7.5 7.5 0.1 20.4 20.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.4 0.0 10.1 0.9 0.0 5.3 3.8 7.5 7.5 0.1 20.4 20.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.25
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 118 0 333 48 0 288 154 763 794 133 742 748 V/C Ratlo(X) 0.78 0.00 0.82 0.50 0.00 0.56 0.67 0.38 0.38 0.02 0.82 0.83 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 148 0 477 137 0 505 173 889 925 133 849 856 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 30.5 0.0 25.6 31.9 0.0 26.0 29.4 12.8 12.8 28.4 17.0 17.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 18.7 0.0 7.2 7.8 0.0 1.7 8,5 0.3 0.3 0.1 5.9 6.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ' mm %lle BackOfQ(50%),veh/li2.0 0.0 4.5 0.5 0.0 2.4 1.9 2.7 2.8 0.0 8.5 8.6 Unslg. Movement Delay, s/veh X®
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 49.3 0.0 32.8 39.7 0.0 27.7 37.9 13.1 13.1 28.5 22.9 23.0 LnGrp LOS D C D C D B B C C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 364 185 703 1231
Approach Delay, s/veh 37.0 29.2 16.8 23.0
Approach LOS D C B C
1- §-=—§■ r
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s9,5 33.3 6.3 17.4 10.3 32.5 8.9 14.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting {Gmax5t.a 33.5 5.1 18.4 6.5 32.0 5.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (9.0+113,% 9.5 2.9 12.1 5.8 22.5 5.4 7.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.6 fhfersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 23.8
HCM 7th LOS C
ISA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1790
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project 6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue Cumulative Year WP_AM Peak Hour MIT > > < t A V i V
Movement EBL EBY EBR _WBL. NBL NBT MBl SBT^^SBM
Lane Configurations ft f ft f
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 150 564 508 106 503 322 260 397 51 297 994 221 Future Volume (veh/h) 150 564 508 106 503 322 260 397 51 297 994 221 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 yMi
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-BikeAd](A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus. Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No ^mm
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 163 613 552 115 547 350 283 432 55 323 1080 240 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 '"m
Cap, veh/h 190 983 596 160 924 724 344 828 105 351 1272 568 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.20 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1767 3526 1572 1767 3526 1572 3428 3148 399 1767 3526 1572 GrpVolume(v), veh/h 163 613 552 115 547 350 283 241 246 323 1080 240 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1767 1763 1572 1767 1763 1572 1714 1763 1784 1767 1763 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.7 18.0 33.0 7.5 16.0 18.3 9.6 13.8 14.0 21.2 33.4 13.6 Cycle Q C!ear(g_c), s 10.7 18.0 33.0 7.5 16.0 18.3 9.6 13.8 14.0 21.2 33.4 13.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 190 983 596 160 924 724 344 463 469 351 1272 568 V/C Ratio(X) 0.86 0.62 0.93 0.72 0.59 0.48 0.82 0.52 0.52 0.92 0.85 0.42 Avail Cap{c_a), veh/h 224 983 596 179 924 724 550 536 543 433 1370 611 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(i) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 51.9 37.3 35.1 52.3 38.1 22.1 52.2 37.2 37.3 46.5 34.8 28.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 21.5 1.5 20.8 9.0 1.3 0.8 2.5 1.0 1.0 20.3 5.2 0.7 Initial Q Delay{d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/li6.7 7.6 17.6 3.6 6.8 6.4 4.1 5.9 6.0 11.2 15.0 5.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh '■'wwm
LnGrp Delay{d), s/veh 73.4 38.7 56.0 61.4 39.5 23.0 54.7 38.2 38.3 66.8 40.1 29.2 LnGrp LOS E D E E D C D D D E D C ij
Approach Vol, veh/h
Approach Delay, s/veh
Approach LOS
-Mslgned Phs
1328

50.2 D
1012

36.2 D
t'
770

44.3 D
1643

43.7 D
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), t5.9 48.7 16.7 37.0 27.5 37.1 14.7 39.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmalc5^.a 46.0 15,0 30.0 29.0 36.0 12.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+!11t.& 35.4 12.7 20.3 23.2 16.0 9.5 35.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 7.3 0.0 4.7 0.3 2.7 0.0 0.0 Ihtersection Summaiy
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 44.0
HCM 7th LOS D
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1791
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Willow Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour MIT
>
>
V t A
V i V
Movement ^mm^BT- EBR 'WBL WBT WBR^--NBL - NBT -SBg
Lane Configurations f t f f f
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 22 259 237 526 255 259 215 889 670 252 655 42 Future Volume (veh/h) 22 259 237 526 255 259 215 889 670 252 655 42 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad] 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Ad] Sat Flov^, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1900 1900 1900 1885 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 282 258 572 277 282 234 966 728 274 712 46 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 67 332 281 558 540 457 398 1683 777 243 1244 386 Airive On Green 0.04 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.28 0.28 0.22 0.33 0.33 0.13 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 3510 1900 1610 1795 5147 1598 1810 5187 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 24 282 258 572 277 282 234 966 728 274 712 46 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1755 1900 1610 1795 1716 1598 1810 1729 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 16.0 10.5 17.4 13.4 11.0 12.8 17.0 21.7 14.7 13.2 2.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 16.0 10.5 17.4 13.4 11.0 12.8 17.0 21.7 14.7 13.2 2.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 67 332 281 558 540 457 398 1683 777 243 1244 386 V/C Ratio{X) 0.36 0.85 0.92 1.02 0.51 0.62 0.59 0.57 0.94 1.13 0.57 0.12 Avail Cap(c_a}, veh/h 130 402 340 558 544 461 398 1755 799 243 1863 578 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 51.3 43.6 15.9 46.0 32.8 14.9 38.1 30.5 9.0 47.4 36.6 21.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 14.1 26.5 44.5 1.7 3.7 1.6 1.1 19.5 96.2 1.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %jie BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 8.5 5.7 10.8 6.2 4.2 5.8 7.1 9.4 13.1 5.7 1.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 52.5 57.7 42.4 90.5 34.5 18.6 39.7 31.5 28.5 143.5 38.0 21.6 LnGrp LOS D E D F 0 B D C C F D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 564 1131 1928 1032
Approach Delay, s/veh 50.5 58.8 31.4 65.3
Approach LOS D E C E
flmer^slgned Phs 2 3 4 1
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.5 31.9 10.3 37.6 20.0 41.5 22.0 25.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.3 5.7 6.2 6.5 5.3 5.7 4.6 6.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.7 39.3 8.0 31.3 14.7 37.3 17.4 23.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 14.8 15.2 3.4 15.4 16.7 23.7 19.4 18.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 11.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 12.1 0.0 1.4 HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh
HCM 7th LOS

47.9 D
ISA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1792
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: Willow Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour MIT
>
> < t V i V
Movement rr - . misii. 'lEBELse NBL NBE. :.3BL
Lane Configurations f f f f f
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 449 255 333 246 210 107 273 1373 280 120 908 401 Future Volume (veh/h) 449 255 333 246 210 107 273 1373 280 120 908 401 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Ad](A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1885 1885 1885 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 473 268 351 259 221 113 287 1445 295 126 956 422 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 498 467 395 293 251 213 345 1582 491 153 1564 486 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.25 0.25 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1900 1610 1810 1900 1610 3483 5147 1598 1810 5187 1610 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 473 268 351 259 221 113 287 1445 295 126 956 422 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1900 1610 1810 1900 1610 1742 1716 1598 1810 1729 1610 Q Serve(g_s), s 29.4 14.2 24.1 16.0 13.1 7.5 9.3 31.0 18.0 7.8 18.1 28.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c). s

29.4 14.2 24.1 16.0 13.1 7.5 9.3 31.0 18.0 7.8 18.1 28.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c). veh/h 498 467 395 293 251 213 345 1582 491 153 1564 486 V/C Ratio(X) 0.95 0.57 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.53 0.83 0.91 0.60 0.82 0.61 0.87 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 501 467 395 330 254 215 377 1586 492 153 1564 486 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.7 38.0 41.7 47.0 48.8 46.4 50.7 38.2 33.7 51.6 34.3 37.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 28.8 3.4 22.6 25.9 30.1 5.7 12.5 9.3 4.3 27.6 1.4 17.7 Initial Q D0lay(d3), sNeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 16.6 6.9 11.8 9.3 8.3 3.3 4.6 14.2 7.3 4.7 7.8 13.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 69.6 41.3 64.3 72.9 78.9 52.1 63.1 47.5 38.0 79.2 35.7 55.5 LnGrp LOS E D E E E D E D D E D E
Approach Vol, veh/h 1092 593 2027 1504
Approach Delay, s/veh 60.9 71.2 48.3 44.9
Approach LOS E E D D
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.6 40.2 38.8 20.9 16.0 40.9 23.8 33.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.3 5.7 5.3 5.7 6.3 5.7 5.3 5.7 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 12.4 33.6 31.7 15.3 9.7 35.3 20.9 26.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 11.3 30.4 31.4 15.1 9.8 33.0 18.0 26.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.2 0.5 0.0 HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh
HCM 7th LOS

52.6 D
ISA
10/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1793
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary
3: Peach Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour MIT
Movement '^S&eu: iflBL; EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR
^ t
INBLjI^i
A V i V
Lane Configurations 4^
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1 783 85 59 622 36 101 74 59 10 75 1 Future Volume (veh/h) 1 783 85 59 622 36 101 74 59 10 75 1 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-BIke Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flov/, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1 833 90 63 662 38 107 79 63 11 80 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 80 986 106 135 943 52 233 128 84 108 361 4
Arrive On Green 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1659 179 82 1585 87 580 619 406 94 1748 20 Grp Volume{v), veh/h 924 0 0 763 0 0 249 0 0 92 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1838 0 0 1755 0 0 1605 0 0 1863 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.5 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.10 0.08 0.05 0.43 0.25 0.12 0.01
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1172 0 0 1130 0 0 445 0 0 474 0 0 V/C Ratlo(X) 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a}, veh/h 1601 0 0 1506 0 0 758 0 0 835 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fllter(l) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0,00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 7.5 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -imam %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr8.9 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d}, s/veh 9.4 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 17.8 0.0 0.0 15.2 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 924 763 249 92
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.4 7.0 17.8 15.2
Approach LOS A A B a
l^imer-Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 1
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.9 31.4 13.9 31.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 37.5 18.5 37.5
Max Q Clear Time {g_c+l1), s 8.5 20.5 3.8 14.8 . i
Green ExtTime (p_c), s 1.0 6.4 0.3 6.0
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 9.8
HCM 7th LOS A
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1794
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary
4: Minnewawa Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour MIT
EBJiS, WBL:
t V \
Jig
V
■!^.-M
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 17 497 180 35 505 223 260 628 64 226 310 15 Future Volume (veh/h) 17 497 180 35 505 223 260 628 64 226 310 15 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pad-Bike Adj{A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1900 1900 1900 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 18 534 194 38 543 240 280 675 69 243 333 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 114 631 535 117 641 543 580 727 616 272 382 18 Arrive On Green 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.33 0.39 0.39 0.15 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 691 1870 1585 738 1900 1610 1781 1870 1585 1767 1756 84 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 18 534 194 38 543 240 280 675 69 243 0 349 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 691 1870 1585 738 1900 1610 1781 1870 1585 1767 0 1840 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 29.8 10.4 5.7 29.9 13.1 14.2 38.9 3.1 15.2 0.0 20.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 32.7 29.8 10.4 35.5 29.9 13.1 14.2 38.9 3,1 15.2 0.0 20.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05
Lane Grp Cap{c), veh/h 114 631 535 117 641 543 580 727 616 272 0 400 V/CRatio{X) 0.16 0.85 0.36 0.32 0.85 0.44 0.48 0.93 0.11 0.89 0.00 0.87 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 117 640 542 121 650 551 580 806 683 306 0 629 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.8 34.6 28.2 51.1 34.6 29.1 30.4 32.9 22.0 46.7 0.0 42.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 10,2 0.4 1.6 10.1 0.6 0.6 16.0 0.1 24.6 0.0 8.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/lr0.5 14.8 3.9 1.1 14.9 4.9 6.2 20.4 1.2 8.5 0.0 10.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 50.4 44.8 28.6 52.6 44.7 29.6 31.0 48.9 22.1 71.4 0.0 50.6 LnGrp LOS D D C D D C C D C E D
Approach Vol, veh/h 746
Approach Delay, s/veh 40.7
Approach LOS D
821

40.7 D
1024

42.2 D
592

59.1 E
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), 21.8 48.3 42.5 41.1 29.0 42.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmal^.S 48.5 38.5 29.5 38.5 38.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+m?,a 40.9 34.7 16.2 22.6 37.5;
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 2.9 1.5 0.7 1.9 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 44.6
HCM 7th LOS D
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1795
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary
5: Minnewawa Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour MIT
l^ovement EB>V EBR WBL
< ^ t A V i V
WBT WBR NBL NBt NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations *1 1^
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 129 179 149 23 177 5 161 1100 18 4 616 111 Future Volume (veh/h) 129 179 149 23 177 5 161 1100 18 4 616 111 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-BlkeAdj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 136 188 157 24 186 5 169 1158 19 4 648 117 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 174 231 193 49 317 9 215 1491 24 10 899 162
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.42 0.42 0.01 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 942 787 1781 1813 49 1781 3578 59 1767 2984 538 Grp Volume{v), veh/h 136 0 345 24 0 191 169 575 602 4 382 383 Grp Sat Flow{s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1729 1781 0 1862 1781 1777 1860 1767 1763 1759 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.4 0.0 11.1 0.8 0.0 5.6 5.4 16.4 16.5 0.1 11.4 11.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.4 0.0 11.1 0.8 0.0 5.6 5,4 16.4 16.5 0.1 11.4 11.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.31
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 174 0 423 49 0 325 215 740 775 10 531 530 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.81 0.49 0.00 0.59 0.79 0.78 0.78 0.42 0.72 0.72 Avail Cap(c_a}, veh/h 257 0 628 154 0 569 348 920 962 150 718 716 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 26.0 0.0 21.0 28.2 0.0 22.4 25.2 14.8 14.8 29.2 18.4 18.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.9 0.0 5.2 7.3 0.0 1.7 6.2 3.4 3.2 27.0 2.3 2.3 Initial Q Delay{d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ{50%),veh/lr2.2 0.0 4.7 0.4 0.0 2.4 2.5 6.3 6.6 0.1 4.5 4.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d}, s/veh 34.8 0.0 26.2 35.6 0.0 24.1 31.4 18.2 18.1 56.2 20.7 20.7 LnGrp LOS C C D C C B B E C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 481 215 1346 769
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.6 25.3 19.8 20.9
Approach LOS C C B C
iRmer-Sgned Phs 1 " 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s4.8 29.1 6.1 18.9 11.6 22.3 10.3 14.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax^.a 30.5 5.1 21.4 11.5 24.0 8.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l13,'b 18.5 2.8 13.1 7.4 13.4 6.4 7.6 -A'.-.

Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.1 0.0 1.3 0.2 3.6 0.1 0.7 HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 22.0
HCM 7th LOS C
LSA08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1796
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour MIT

EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations ^ f ++ f f
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 322 511 441 48 383 329 473 1097 90 199 692 230 Future Volume (veh/h) 322 511 441 48 383 329 473 1097 90 199 692 230 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mm
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-BIke Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mm Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/!n 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 339 538 464 51 403 346 498 1155 95 209 728 242 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 3 3 3
Cap, veh/h 348 797 709 215 593 466 758 1167 96 222 906 404 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.22 0.22 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.22 0.35 0.35 0.13 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3610 1610 1810 3610 1610 3456 3325 273 1767 3526 1572 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 339 538 464 51 403 346 498 617 633 209 728 242 "C:' Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1728 1777 1821 1767 1763 1572 Q Serve(g_s), s 22.3 16.3 0.9 3.1 12.6 7.4 15.7 41.3 41.4 14.0 23.1 10.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 22.3 16.3 0.9 3.1 12.6 7.4 15.7 41.3 41.4 14.0 23.1 10.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 mm Lane Grp Cap{c), veh/h 348 797 709 215 593 466 758 624 639 222 906 404 V/C Ratio(X) 0.97 0.68 0.65 0.24 0.68 0.74 0.66 0.99 0.99 0.94 0.80 0.60 mm Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 348 1267 918 215 905 606 758 624 639 222 1061 473 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 48.0 42.7 26.3 47.8 47.0 16.1 42.6 38.6 38.6 51.9 41.6 15.4 mm Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 41.2 1.5 1.6 0.2 2.3 4.8 1.7 33.1 33.2 44.3 4.4 2.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .mm %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/It8.6 7.2 10.0 1.3 5.6 4.8 6.7 22.7 23.4 8.9 10.6 3.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 89.2 44.2 28.0 48.0 49.3 20.9 44.3 71.7 71.8 96.2 46.0 17.6 LnGrp LOS F D C D D 0 D E E F D B
Approach Vol, veh/h 1341 800 1748 1179
Approach Delay, s/veh 50.0 36.9 63.9 49.1
Approach LOS D D E D
firher-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4' 5 r 8 I
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc),S0.2 36.8 27.0 25.7 19.0 48.0 20.2 32.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 *6
Max Green Setting (Gma2),.9 36.0 23.0 30.0 15.0 42.0 11.0 *42 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ltl^,^ 25.1 24.3 14.6 16.0 43.4 5.1 18.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 5.6 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 m
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 52.5
HCM 7th LOS D
* HCM 7th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

ISA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1797
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Transportation Impact Anaiysis De Young Properties Peach and Behvmer Project October 2024 Ciovis, California LSA

APPENDIX F

QUEUING ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
P:\20231181 De Young Annexatlon\Report\De Young Annexation Project TIA.docx (10/09/24) 1798
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Existing Year WP_AM Peak Hour
>
> < t A
V \ V
Une Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 82 134 188 93 289 106 714 53 70 630 56 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.28 0.35 0.37 0.62 0.43 0.48 0.09 0.32 0.45 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 42.5 30.1 6.9 41.2 32.6 42.8 26.7 0.3 42.3 27.6 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 42.5 30.1 6.9 41.2 32.6 42.8 26.7 0.3 42.3 27.6 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 41 57 0 46 117 53 114 0 35 102 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 96 124 54 103 235 115 177 0 85 163 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 240 90 250 105 250 205
Base Capacity (vph) 348 625 655 393 609 375 2860 952 371 2833 944 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Splllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.24 0.21 029 0.24 0.47 0.28 0.25 0.06 0.19 0.22 0.06 ISA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1799
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue &Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Existing Year WP_AM Peak Hour
> > ^ t i V
Una Group: I^EBL EBR NBlk;.

Lane Group Flow (vph) 177 172 91 720 822 122
v/c Ratio 0.42 0.34 0.18 0.25 0.43 0.18
Control Delay (s/veh) 24.3 6.0 27.0 6.6 15.3 4.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 24.3 6.0 27.0 6.6 15.3 4.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 59 0 16 39 82 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 115 42 39 69 128 30
Internal Link DIst (ft) 1383 1272 2582
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 230 235 130
Base Capacity (vph) 796 807 857 3247 2689 894
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.21 0.11 0.22 0.31 0.14
jntensection Summary i
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1800
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue Existing Year wp_am Peak Hour > —>■ > < V t A
V \ V
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 37 346 139 15 288 161 130 176 20 132 240 37 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.29 0.23 0.05 0.59 0.33 0.41 0.42 0.05 0.42 0.57 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 37.5 20.3 10.0 37.9 32.1 14.7 38.1 31.2 0.2 38.0 34.2 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 37.5 20.3 10.0 37.9 32.1 14.7 38.1 31.2 0.2 38.0 34.2 0.4 Queue Length 50th (It) 16 53 13 7 125 27 60 76 0 62 107 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 55 136 71 29 247 88 139 162 0 140 217 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 45 220 60 230 260 15
Base Capacity (vph) 554 1834 865 554 944 849 543 926 833 538 917 825 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.19 0.16 0.03 0.31 0.19 0.24 0.19 0.02 0.25 0.26 0.04 LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1801
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Existing Year WP_PM Peak Hour
Lane Group -
> - > <
. WBT :.

A t A
NBR
V
BBk.

V
Lane Group Flow (vph) 24 127 141 109 308 138 850 140 120 651 47 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.38 0.35 0.48 0.62 0.57 0.52 0.23 0.51 0.40 0.08 Control Delay (s/veh) 41.9 36.1 9.0 44.1 31.6 46.0 25.2 5.6 44.8 24,2 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 41.9 36.1 9.0 44.1 31.6 46.0 25.2 5.6 44.8 24.2 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 57 0 50 105 64 120 0 55 89 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 39 124 45 114 247 140 195 36 123 147 0 Internal Link Gist (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 240 90 250 105 250 205
Base Capacity (vph) 313 562 576 357 566 337 2593 877 341 2619 885 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.23 0.24 0.31 0.54 0.41 0.33 0.16 0.35 0.25 0.05 LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1802
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue &Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Existing Year WP_PM Peak Hour
Una Groups
> > ^ t I V
Lane Group Flow (vph) 143 203 209 946 734 107
v/c Ratio 0.39 0.41 0.41 0.31 0.42 0.17
Control Delay (s/veh) 24,8 6.7 27.5 6.5 16.3 4.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 24.8 6.7 27.5 6.5 16.3 4.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 45 0 36 52 70 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 98 47 72 88 119 30
Internal Link DIst (ft) 1383 1272 2582
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 230 235 130
Base Capacity (vph) 721 765 789 3050 2475 825
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.27 0.26 0.31 0.30 0.13
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1803
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Existing Year WP_PM Peak Hour
>
WBT
^ ^ t A V i y
W'-HSIBL" ^ NBT NBR - SBL SBT SBg
Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 311 117 6 253 129 136 248 25 72 198 38 v/c Ratio 0.15 0.27 0.20 0.02 0.54 0.28 0.42 0.45 0.05 0.24 0.49 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 34.4 19.6 8.5 34.3 30.5 11.9 35.4 28.3 0.2 34.9 31.8 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 34.4 19.6 8.5 34.3 30.5 11.9 35.4 28.3 0.2 34.9 31.8 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 45 7 2 105 14 59 105 0 30 82 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 60 117 53 15 206 62 132 197 0 83 170 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 45 220 60 230 260 15
Base Capacity (vph) 574 1876 883 574 978 876 563 959 860 557 950 852 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.17 0.13 0.01 0.26 0.15 0.24 0.26 0.03 0.13 0.21 0.04 * . ~ .'.

ISA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1804
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term NP AM Peak Hour
> - > r t
yiNKJ ^5
V i V
Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 159 228 160 366 154 752 100 91 703 57 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.41 0.45 0.65 0.75 0.64 0.46 0.16 0.46 0.54 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh) 48.0 35.3 7.7 51.5 40.5 51.8 27.5 2.5 48.3 31.1 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 48.0 35.3 7.7 51.5 40.5 51.8 27.5 2.5 48.3 31.1 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 47 78 0 89 176 86 132 0 51 130 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 100 152 61 169 #373 165 193 17 106 183 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Tum Bay Length (ft) 230 240 90 250 105 250 205
Base Capacity (vph) 281 504 594 317 500 302 2324 800 299 2302 794 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio
IR!S^cfton"Sumrjlirv

0.30 0.32 0.38 0.50 0.73 0.51
.* •" 1..

0.32 0.13 0.30 0.31 0.07
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1805
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue &Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term NP AM Peak Hour
> - > <
< t V i V
riir-■ stoiK Km, 'Vv'vSBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 207 72 197 107 98 32 125 782 81 24 916 188 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.19 0.41 0.38 0.35 0.09 0.37 0.35 0.11 0.14 0.57 0.31 Control Delay (s/veh) 39.6 33.8 8.1 42.0 42.1 0.5 45.8 20.4 1.6 46.2 28.0 7.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 39.6 33.8 8.1 42.0 42.1 0.5 45.8 20.4 1.6 46.2 28.0 7.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 104 34 0 54 50 0 34 97 0 13 158 11 Queue Length 95fh (ft) 207 83 59 125 117 0 77 199 11 44 243 65 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1383 5362 1272 2582
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 230 100 100 235 145 250 130
Base Capacity (vph) 568 542 600 477 441 471 359 2403 814 168 2259 792 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.13 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.07 0.35 0.33 0.10 0.14 0.41 0.24 LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1806
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue Near Term np_am Peak Hour >
> <
V t V \ V
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 112 436 COCOCM 47 368 227 217 335 39 203 589 155 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.42 0.51 0.27 0.80 0.50 0.80 0.59 0.07 0.77 1.05 0.29 Control Delay (s/veh) 60.6 34.5 20.7 56.0 54.8 25.5 69.4 40.7 0.3 67.7 93.1 16.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 60.6 34.5 20.7 56.0 54.8 25.5 69.4 40.7 0.3 67.7 93.1 16.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 81 143 91 33 254 83 156 213 0 146 -496 35 Queue Length 95th (ft) 148 193 179 77 392 170 #282 353 0 #249 #807 99 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Turn Bay Length (ft) 235 50 220 60 230 260 15
Base Capacity (vph) 328 1117 595 328 559 539 328 568 547 328 559 539 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.39 0.48 0.14 0.66 0.42 0.66 0.59 0.07 0.62 1.05 0.29 Intersection Summary
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ISA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1807
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
1: Willow Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term NP PM Peak Hour
fntersectlcn Surhmary
>
A
iNBlii
t
NBT
A
NBR
V i V
€BL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 23 158 196 193 354 189 854 221 145 657 43 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.54 0.48 0.71 0.63 0.71 0.54 0.36 0.62 0.44 0.08 Control Delay (s/veh) 44,7 43.4 9,7 53.3 32.6 54.0 27.8 8.9 51.0 27.4 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 44.7 43.4 9.7 53.3 32.6 54.0 27.8 8.9 51.0 27.4 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 82 0 100 134 99 146 18 77 113 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 162 60 #229 #343 #233 213 79 160 161 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 240 90 250 105 250 205
Base Capacity (vph) 282 506 573 321 568 304 2336 822 307 2360 812 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.31 0.34 0.60 0.62 0.62 0.37 0.27 0.47 0.28 0.05 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ISA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1808
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term NP PM Peak Hour
> > r t A
V \ V
Lane Group . jyvBi . NBL NBT NBR SBL itjjaZISIUBQ
Lane Group Flow (vph) 211 131 257 153 121 58 251 1047 160 59 800 180 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.40 0.55 0.89 0.37 0.14 0.76 0.54 0.23 0.35 0.52 0.30 Control Delay (s/veh) 62.0 23.8 9.9 78.4 23.3 0.7 43.8 15.9 3.5 30.6 17.2 4.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 62.0 23.8 9.9 78.4 23.3 0.7 43.8 15.9 3.5 30.6 17.2 4.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) -91 39 9 51 36 0 42 103 0 19 74 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #219 80 60 #159 75 0 #105 161 30 52 119 37 Intemal Link Dist (ft) 1383 5362 1272 2582
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 230 100 100 235 145 250 130
Base Capacity (vph) 256 650 700 171 650 670 329 1925 711 171 1775 671 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio
Intersection Summary ^

0.82 0.20 0.37 0.89 0.19 0.09 0.76 0.54 0.23 0.35 0.45 0.27 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1809
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue Near Term np_pm Peak Hour > < ^ t V i V
Lane Group Flow (vph) 199 407 273 33 336 216 296 644 55 146 480 160 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.34 0.44 0.20 0.79 0.50 0.94 1.02 0.09 0.67 0.91 0.31 Control Delay (s/veh) 71.8 31.9 17.2 56.8 57.6 26.7 88.2 81.0 2.0 65.9 64.4 18.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 71.8 31.9 17.2 56.8 57.6 26.7 88.2 81.0 2.0 65.9 64.4 18.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 150 134 79 24 245 82 230 -530 0 110 361 40 Queue Length 95th (ft) 246 179 159 61 364 163 #452 #936 9 186 #633 106 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Turn Bay Length (ft) 235 50 220 60 230 "260 15
Base Capacity (vph) 320 1192 629 320 546 529 314 632 598 311 530 516 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.62 0.34 0.43 0.10 0.62 0.41 0.94 1.02 0.09 0.47 0.91 0.31 InFersectfbn Sumniary
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue Is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles,
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1810
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
1: Willow Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP AM Peak Hour
> > < t V \ V
Lane Group iHEBL EBT EBR. WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT cb^i Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 160 228 220 378 154 752 121 93 703 57 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.45 0.47 0.75 0.76 0.65 0.47 0.20 0.48 0.54 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh) 48.6 37.6 8.2 55.5 41.0 52.8 27.8 4.3 48.9 31.3 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 48.6 37.6 8.2 55.5 41.0 52.8 27.8 4.3 48.9 31.3 0.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 47 82 0 123 185 86 133 0 52 130 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 101 155 62 #275 #399 167 194 31 109 183 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Tum Bay Length (ft) 230 240 90 250 105 250 205
Base Capacity (vph) 274 493 586 310 498 295 2272 786 292 2251 779 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.32 0.39 0.71 0.76 0.52 0.33 0.15 0.32 0.31 0.07 &itersection Summary
# 95th percentiie volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1811
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue &Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP AM Peak Hour
> <
Lane Group • "HHHi : •w'Vyflii
Lane Group Flow (vph) 214 72 197 107
v/c Ratio 0.57 0.19 0.41 0.39
Control Delay (s/veh) 40.5 34.3 8,1 42.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 40.5 34.3 8.1 42.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 111 35 0 56
Queue Length 95th (ft) 214 83 59 125
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1383
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 230 100
Base Capacity (vph) 557 532 592 468
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.14 0.33 0.23
98 0.36

43.0 0.0

43.0 52
117
5362
432
0 0
0 0.23
< ^ t V i V
32 0.09

0.5 0.0

0.5 0
0 100
465
0 0
0 0.07
125

0.38 46.9

0.0 46.9
35 77
235
352
0 0
0 0.36
796

0.35 20.4

0.0 20.4
101
202
1272
2380
0 0
0 0.33
81 0.10

1.5 0.0

1.5 0
11 145
808
0 0
0 0.10
24 0.15

47.1 0.0

47.1 13
44 250
165
0 0
0 0.15
957

0.59 28.2

0.0 28.2
169
256
2582
2216
0 0
0 0.43
207

0.33 8.4

0.0 8.4
15 74
130
784
0 0
0 0.26
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1812
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue Near Term WP_am Peak Hour > > < V
A t A
V i V
Una Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SET SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 112 436 288 47 368 239 217 346 39 236 620 155 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.42 0.51 0.27 0.80 0.52 0.80 0.64 0.07 0.83 1.11 0.29 Control Delay (s/veh) 60,6 34.5 20.7 56.0 54.8 26.9 69.4 43.2 0.3 70.5 110.2 16.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 60,6 34.5 20.7 56.0 54.8 26.9 69,4 43.2 0.3 70.5 110.2 16.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 81 143 91 33 254 91 156 229 0 169 -544 35 Queue Length 95th (ft) 148 193 179 77 392 184 #282 366 0 #321 #863 99 Intemal Link Dist (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Tum Bay Length (ft) 235 50 220 60 230 260 15
Base Capacity (vph) 328 1117 595 328 559 539 328 559 539 328 559 539 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.39 0.48 0.14 0.66 0.44 0.66 0.62 0.07 0.72 1.11 0.29 Intersection Summary -
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1813
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour
> > <
-
A t A
V V
Une Group MHHI mm. ^AfDT' "
VaNpK 1 ..NBR,- ..SBL . m mmam
Lane Group Flow (vph) 23 163 196 236 363 189 854 292 153 657 43 v/c Ratio 0.15 0.57 0.48 0.77 0.62 0.73 0.55 0.45 0.66 0.44 0.08 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.7 45.2 9.7 56.8 32.4 57.0 28.8 9.2 54.0 28.1 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.7 45.2 9.7 56.8 32.4 57.0 28.8 9.2 54.0 28.1 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 87 0 129 141 101 150 25 83 114 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 42 168 60 #309 #358 #239 215 98 170 162 0 Internal Link DIst (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 240 90 250 105 250 205
Base Capacity (vph) 270 484 556 307 590 290 2233 826 293 2255 782 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Splllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.34 0.35 0.77 0.62 0.65 0.38 0.35 0.52 0.29 0.05 IMfsectjon Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1814
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue &Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour
Lane Group
>

EBL EBT
>
EBR
<
V
Mm
t
NBT
A
NBR
V
S6L
i
SBT
V
SBB
Lane Group Flow (vph) 234 131 257 153 121 58 251 1094 160 59 827 194 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.40 0.56 0.89 0.37 0.14 0.77 0.57 0.22 0.35 0.54 0.32 Control Delay (s/veh) 76,6 23,8 10,1 78.9 23.3 0,7 43.9 16.2 3.5 30.7 17.4 4.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 76.6 23.8 10.1 78.9 23.3 0.7 43.9 16.2 3.5 30.7 17.4 4.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) -108 39 10 51 36 0 42 109 0 19 77 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #243 80 61 #159 75 0 #106 170 30 52 124 38 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1383 5362 1272 2582
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 230 100 100 235 145 250 130
Base Capacity (vph) 255 648 697 171 648 669 328 1929 712 171 1770 679 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Splllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio
Intersection Summarv ■

0.92 0.20 0.37 0.89 0.19 0.09 0.77 0.57 0.22 0.35 0.47 0.29 Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1815
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
Control Delay (s/veh)
Queue Delay
Total Delay (s/veh)
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Internal Link Dist (ft)
Tum Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
> - > <
»
V
mm-' ■ mi
t
NBT
A
NBR
V i
mmm
V
Hi
199 407 273 33 336 253 296 677 55 167 500 160

0.78 0.34 0.44 0.20 0.79 0.58 0.94 1.09 0.09 0.72 0.94 0.31

71.8 31.9 17.2 56.8 57.6 30.6 88.2 102.9 2.0 68.5 70.5 18.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

71.8 31.9 17.2 56.8 57.6 30.6 88.2 102.9 2.0 68.5 70.5 18.0 150 134 79 24 245 107 230 -601 0 126 381 40
246 179 159 61 364 200 #452 #995 9 210 #672 106
1251 861 1224 2572
235 50 220 60 230 260 15
320 1192 629 320 546 532 314 620 587 311 530 516
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.62 0.34 0.43 0.10 0.62 0.48 0.94 1.09 0.09 0.54 0.94 0.31 rCEXIBBiBBB —1
, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles,
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1816
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
1: Willow Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year NP AM Peak Hour
>
> t A
V V
Lane Group MDCfbu; . N8t SBL m .

Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 229 275 564 638 199 808 273 153 941 59 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.67 0.56 2.02 1.33 0.79 0.52 0.42 0.71 0.65 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh) 54.0 48.8 11.1 496.4 194.6 66.0 30.1 8.4 61.2 33.3 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 54.0 48.8 11.1 496.4 194.6 66.0 30.1 8.4 61.2 33.3 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 54 135 12 -567 -537 123 156 21 93 191 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 111 234 88 #882 #870 #273 211 87 #190 250 0 Internal Link DIst (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Tum Bay Length (ft) 230 240 90 250 105 250 205
Base Capacity (vph) 248 444 569 279 478 267 2050 774 264 2030 717 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.52 0.48 2.02 1.33 0.75 0.39 0.35 0.58 0.46 0.08 Intellection Summary
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown Is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
wm
fJrr.

LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1817
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year NP PM Peak Hour
< ^ t
WRi iNBL- NBT
A V i V
Lane Group Flow (vph) 473 245 351 259 207 113 287 1445 295 126 956 422 v/c Ratio 1.11 0.62 0.70 0.78 0.70 0.32 1.17 0.86 0.46 0.91 0.54 0.54 Control Delay (s/veh) 118.0 48.6 25.8 61.8 58.5 8.3 158.0 42.2 14.5 109.2 31.6 8.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 118.0 48.6 25.8 61.8 58.5 8.3 158.0 42.2 14.5 109.2 31.6 8.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) O CD 166 101 183 145 0 T CO CM 367 64 94 208 35 Queue Length 95th (ft) #612 253 212 #298 226 42 #221 430 145 #212 253 122 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1383 5362 1272 2582
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 230 100 100 235 145 250 130
Base Capacity (vph) 426 403 502 351 324 379 245 1693 645 138 1789 788 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Splllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.11 0.61 0.70 0.74 0.64 0.30 1.17 0.85 0.46 0.91 0.53 0.54 Intersection Summary —P
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue Is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentiie volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
10/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1818
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue Cumulative Year NP^AM Peak Hour >
> r < t V i V
(.ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NET NBR SBL SET SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 163 613 552 115 547 350 283 421 55 323 1050 240 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.60 0.93 0.61 1.09 0.71 0.96 0.84 0.11 1.10 2.09 0.49 Controi Deiay (s/veh) 71.8 41,2 51.9 67.6 109.7 39.4 95.6 59.4 2.2 129.2 523.4 27.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 71.8 41.2 51.9 67.6 109.7 39.4 95.6 59.4 2.2 129.2 523.4 27.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 129 221 302 91 -497 191 230 321 0 -295 -1342 99 Queue Length 95th (ft) 206 301 #560 154 #758 321 #428 #521 9 #507 #1675 190 Internal Link DIst (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Tum Bay Length (ft) 235 50 220 60 230 260 15
Base Capacity (vph) 294 1022 593 294 502 493 294 502 493 294 502 493 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.60 0.93 0.39 1.09 0.71 0.96 0.84 0.11 1.10 2.09 0.49 Intersection Summary - ^
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycies.
# 95th percentiie volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycies,
m*.

LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1819
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
1: Willow Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year NP PM Peak Hour
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
Gontroi Delay (s/veh)
Queue Delay
Total Delay (s/veh)
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Internal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
>
24 0.18

53.8 0.0

53.8 17
45 230
224
0 0
0 0.11
276

0.80 60.8

0.0 60.8
193
#294
2009
402
0 0
0 0.69
> <
258

0.51 8.7

0.0 8.7
0 69
240
544
0 0
0 0.47
572

2.29 615.0

0.0 615.0
-692
#917
90 250
0 0
0 2.29
^ t A V i V
. mm ■mM
550 234 966 728 265 712 46

1.03 0.97 0.56 0.92 1.10 0.41 0.07

83.4 100.4 31.5 33.7 132.8 29.1 0.2

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

83.4 100.4 31.5 33.7 132.8 29.1 0.2
-469 -178 208 265 JOCMCM
t
144 0
#686 #345 256 #530 #401 183 0
2713 2582 1915
250 105 250 205
536 241 1854 827 241 1854 667
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1.03 0.97 0.52 0.88 1.10 0.38 0.07
1 - Voiume exceeds capacity, queue is theoreticaiiy infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles,
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1820
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue &Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year NP AM Peak Hour
>
> t A
V i
Lane Group .. .u NBT NBR _ ^SBL -JSBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 287 123 215 203 187 78 165 888 138 46 1291 463 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.33 0.44 0.65 0.63 0.22 0.64 0.47 0.21 0.33 0.74 0.64 Control Delay (s/veh) 53.6 40.8 8.3 52.6 53.5 3.0 62.2 28.7 6.0 56.5 34.7 15.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 53.6 40.8 8.3 52.6 53.5 3.0 62.2 28.7 6.0 56,5 34.7 15.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 194 76 0 138 127 0 61 185 2 32 300 101 Queue Length 95th (ft) 294 135 63 218 206 11 #107 240 46 71 366 222 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1383 5362 1272 2582
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 230 100 100 235 145 250 130
Base Capacity (vph) 445 421 524 374 345 396 258 1884 670 160 1852 758 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio
intersectioh Summary

0.64 0.29 0.41 0.54 0.54 0.20 0.64 0.47 0.21 0.29 0.70 0.61 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown Is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
10/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1821
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year NP PM Peak Hour
Une Group '
> >
EBR
<
h'.ViViOswil
t A
V i
MWiSBaiM
V
Lane Group Flow (vph) 339 538 464 51 403 346 498 1122 95 209 708 242 v/c Ratio 1.14 0.43 0.68 0.32 0.87 0.72 1.71 2.09 0.18 0.83 1.44 0.50 Control Delay (s/veh) 143.0 33.8 27.3 61.8 65.3 39.1 365.5 519.8 8.7 79.9 243.4 28.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 143.0 33.8 27.3 61.8 65.3 39.1 365.5 519.8 8.7 79.9 243.4 28.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) -338 184 208 41 320 183 -622 -1528 2 171 -817 106 Queue Length 95th (ft) #529 240 339 85 #474 296 #839 #1799 45 #279 #1055 192 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Turn Bay Length (ft) 235 50 220 60 230 260 15
Base Capacity (vph) 297 1256 682 297 507 511 292 538 522 289 493 486 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spiliback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.14 0.43 0.68 0.17 0.79 0.68 1.71 2.09 0.18 0.72 1.44 0.50 Intet^ction Summary . . .•<' -VS y*
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

ISA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1822
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour
>
> <
-
t r
V \ V
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 230 275 564 649 199 808 273 155 941 59 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.67 0.56 2.02 1.35 0.80 0.52 0.43 0.71 0.65 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh) 54,1 48.8 11.1 497.1 203.6 66.1 30.1 8.4 61,8 33.3 0,4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 54,1 48.8 11.1 497.1 203.6 66.1 30.1 8.4 61.8 33.3 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 54 136 12 -567 -552 123 156 21 95 191 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 111 235 88 #882 #887 #273 211 87 #195 250 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Tum Bay Length (ft) 230 240 90 250 105 250 205
Base Capacity (vph) 247 444 569 279 479 266 2049 774 264 2029 716 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.52 0.48 2.02 1.35 0.75 0.39 0.35 0.59 0.46 0.08 Intersection Summaty
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1823
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour
>
> < t A
V i V
Lane Group i1»■ ..VVBRs- - NBL NBT NBR - SBL $BT' SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 287 130 215 203 206 78 165 COCOCO 138 46 1291 463 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.34 0.44 0.65 0.67 0.21 0.64 0.48 0.21 0.34 0.75 0.64 Control Delay (s/veh) 54.0 40.9 8.2 53.0 55.5 2.9 62.7 29.4 6.1 57.5 35.0 15.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 54.0 40.9 8.2 53.0 55.5 2.9 62.7 29.4 6.1 57.5 35.0 15.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 196 81 0 139 142 0 61 190 2 33 304 103 Queue Length 95th (ft) 294 141 63 218 226 11 #107 240 46 72 366 222 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1383 5362 1272 2582
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 230 100 100 235 145 250 130
Base Capacity (vph) 442 421 524 371 343 394 257 1849 660 142 1839 755 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.31 0.41 0.55 0.60 0.20 0.64 0.48 0.21 0.32 0.70 0.61 Intersection SuniimSv ' "I
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
10/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1824
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour
>
> < t A
V \ V
Une Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WET WBR NBL NET NBR SBL SET SER Lane Group Flow (vph) 163 613 552 115 547 350 283 432 55 323 1080 240 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.60 0.93 0.61 1.09 0.71 0.96 0.86 0.11 1.10 2.15 0.49 Control Delay (s/veh) 71.8 41.2 51.9 67.6 109.7 39.4 95.6 61.6 2.2 129.2 549.5 27.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 71.8 41.2 51.9 67.6 109.7 39.4 95.6 61.6 2.2 129.2 549.5 27.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 129 221 302 91 --497 191 230 333 0 -295 -1392 99 Queue Length 95th (ft) 206 301 #560 154 #758 321 #428 #542 9 #507 #1727 190 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Tum Bay Length (ft) 235 50 220 60 230 260 15
Base Capacity (vph) 294 1022 593 294 502 493 294 502 493 294 502 493 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.60 0.93 0.39 1.09 0.71 0.96 0.86 0.11 1.10 2.15 0.49 Intersection Summary '.- -Sa ■■P"!
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentiie volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

WP?
LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1825
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
1: Willow Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour
>
> < ^ t A V 4 V
Lane Group Flow (vph) 24 282
v/c Ratio 0.18 0.81
Control Delay (s/veh) 53,9 61.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 53.9 61.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 197
Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 #313
Internal Link DIst (ft) 2009
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230
Base Capacity (vph) 223 400
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.11 0.71
IhBitection Stimmary ■
258

0.51 8.6

0.0 8.6
0 69
240
542
0 0
0 0.48
572

2.25 601.5

0.0 601.5
-693
#913
90 254
0 0
0 2.25
559

1.02 81.3

0.0 81.3
-474
#695
2713
548
0 0
0 1.02
234

0.98 101.6

0.0 101.6
-183
#345
250
240
0 0
0 0.98
966

0.56 31.6

0.0 31.6
209
256
2582
1846
0 0
0 0.52
728

0.92 34.5

0.0 34.5
272
#535
105
822
0 0
0 0.89
274

1.13 142.4

0.0 142.4
-243
#413
250
242
0 0
0 1.13
712

0.41 29.2

0.0 29.2
145
183
1915
1864
0 0
0 0.38
46 0.07

0.2 0.0

0.2 0
0 205
671
0 0
0 0.07
3 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1826
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour
>
> < t A
V i V
Une Group EBL EBTvk MiaMBf .wag NBL NBT NBR SBUj
Lane Group Flow (vph) 473 268 351 259 221 113 287 1445 295 126 956 422 v/c Ratio 1.12 0.67 0.70 0.79 0.73 0.31 1.18 0.86 0.46 0.91 0.54 0.54 Control Delay (s/veh) 119.5 50.7 25.6 62.0 60.6 8.2 159.8 42.5 14.6 109.9 31.7 8.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 119.5 50.7 25.6 62.0 60.6 8.2 159.8 42.5 14.6 109.9 31.7 8.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) -406 184 101 183 156 0 -132 367 64 94 208 35 Queue Length 95th (ft) #612 278 212 #298 #244 42 #221 430 145 #212 253 122 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1383 5362 1272 2582
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 230 100 100 235 145 250 130
Base Capacity (vph) 424 402 502 349 322 379 244 1687 643 138 1782 787 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.12 0.67 0.70 0.74 0.69 0.30 1.18 0.86 0.46 0.91 0.54 0.54 Intersection Summary mmmm ■ii^y ;• • .
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycies.

ISA
10/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1827
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue Cumulative Year wp_pm Peak Hour ,nbR;Asbl sbt
Lane Group Flow (vph) 339 538 464 51 403 346 498 1155 95 209 728 242 v/c Ratio 1.14 0.43 0.68 0.32 0.87 0.72 1.71 2.15 0.18 0.83 1.48 0.50 Control Delay (s/veh) 143.0 33.8 27.3 61.8 65.3 39.1 365.5 546.6 CO 79.9 260.2 28.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 143.0 33.8 27.3 61.8 65.3 39.1 365.5 546.6 8.7 79.9 260.2 28.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) -338 184 208 41 320 183 -622 -1586 2 171 -852 106 Queue Length 95th (ft) #529 240 339 85 #474 296 #839 #1856 45 #279 #1094 192 Internal Link DIst (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Tum Bay Length (ft) 235 50 220 60 230 260 15
Base Capacity (vph) 297 1256 682 297 507 511 292 538 522 289 493 486 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 1.14 0.43 0.68 0.17 0.79 0.68 1.71 2.15 0.18 0.72 1.48 0.50 ITOMIon Summary ^ ' - -■
Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1828
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
1: Willow Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Existing Year WP_AM Peak Hour MIT
>
> < t A
V i V
|.ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 82 134 188 93 289 106 714 53 70 630 56 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.28 0.35 0.37 0.62 0.43 0.48 0.09 0.32 0.45 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 42.5 30.1 6.9 41.2 32.6 42.8 26.7 0.3 42.3 27.6 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 42.5 30.1 6.9 41.2 32.6 42.8 26.7 0.3 42.3 27.6 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 41 57 0 46 117 53 114 0 35 102 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 96 124 54 103 235 115 177 0 85 163 0 Internal Link DIst (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 240 355 300 455 415 205
Base Capacity (vph) 348 625 655 393 609 375 2860 952 371 2833 944 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.24 0.21 0.29 0.24 0.47 0.28 0.25 0.06 0.19 0.22 0.06 intersection Summary
LSA
08/12/2024
Synchrol 2 Report

1829
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: WillowAvenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Exisling Year WP_AM Peak Hour MIT
> > ^ t i V
Lane Group mmm r3'NBL^ mm
Lane Group Flow (vph) 177 172 91 720 822 122
v/c Ratio 0.42 0.34 0.18 0.25 0.43 0.18
Conlrol Delay (s/veh) 24.3 6.0 27.0 6.6 15.3 4.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 24.3 6.0 27.0 6.6 15.3 4.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 59 0 16 39 82 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 115 42 39 69 128 30
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1383 1272 2582
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 230 300 225
Base Capacity (vph) 796 807 857 3247 2689 894
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.21 0.11 0.22 0.31 0.14
ISA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1830
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue Existing Year WP_AM Peak Hour MIT >
> <
V t A
V i
Une Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 37 346 139 15 288 161 130 176 20 132 240 37 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.30 0.24 0.05 0.60 0.30 0.42 0.42 0.05 0.42 0.57 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 38.1 20.3 10.1 38.5 32.5 6.5 38.5 31.5 0.2 38.4 34.6 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 38.1 20.3 10.1 38.5 32.5 6.5 38.5 31.5 0.2 38.4 34.6 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 53 13 7 126 0 61 76 0 62 108 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 56 137 71 30 249 48 141 163 0 142 219 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Turn Bay Length (ft) 500 45 220 175 230 425 150
Base Capacity (vph) 534 1778 840 534 911 856 534 911 821 534 911 821 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio
iDtgrsection Summai.V^Hi

0.07 0.19 0.17 0.03 0.32 0.19 0.24 0.19 0.02 0.25 0.26 0.05 ISA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1831
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
1: Willow Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Existing Year WP_PM Peak Hour MIT
> < A t A V i V
Lane Group Flow (vph) 24 127 141 109 308 138 850 140 120 651 47 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.38 0.35 0.48 0.62 0.57 0.52 0.23 0.51 0.40 0.08 Control Delay (s/veh) 41.9 36.1 9.0 44.1 31.6 46.0 25.2 5.6 44.8 24.2 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 41.9 36.1 9.0 44.1 31.6 46.0 25.2 5.6 44.8 24.2 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 11 57 0 50 105 64 120 0 55 89 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 39 124 45 114 247 140 195 36 123 147 0 Internal Link DIst (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 240 355 300 455 415 205
Base Capacity (vph) 313 562 576 357 566 337 2593 877 341 2619 885 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.23 0.24 0.31 0.54 0.41 0.33 0.16 0.35 0.25 0.05 iK
LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1832
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue &Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Existing Year WP_PM Peak Hour MIT
^ t i V
(.ane Group EBL EBR NBl. NBT SBT:,:; sM
Lane Group Flow (vph) 143 203 209 946 734 107
v/c Ratio 0.38 0.41 0.41 0.31 0.41 0.17
Control Delay {s/veh) 24,5 6.5 27.3 6.4 16.1 4.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 24.5 6.5 27.3 6.4 16.1 4.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 45 0 37 52 69 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 96 47 71 87 117 29
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1383 1272 2582
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 230 235 225
Base Capacity (vph) 738 780 799 3080 2559 850
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.26 0.26 0.31 0.29 0.13
LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1833
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue Existing Year wp_pm Peak Hour MiT > < < \ t V I V
Une Group eiii^ ■ EBR- ■
WBR-- m MBJ NBRd
Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 311 117 6 253 129 136 248 25 72 198 38 v/c Ratio 0.15 0.27 0.20 0.02 0.54 0.26 0.42 0.45 0.05 0.24 0.49 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 34.4 19.6 8.5 34.3 30.5 6.9 35.4 28.3 0.2 34.9 31.8 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 34.4 19.6 8.5 34.3 30.5 6.9 35.4 28.3 0.2 34.9 31.8 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 45 7 2 105 0 59 105 0 30 82 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 60 117 53 15 206 43 132 197 0 83 170 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Turn Bay Length (ft) 500 45 220 175 230 260 150
Base Capacity (vph) 574 1876 883 574 978 894 563 959 860 557 950 852 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Splllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.17 0.13 0.01 0.26 0.14 0.24 0.26 0.03 0.13 0.21 0.04 S.-2r.^^Ki
LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report
Pages
1834
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
1: Willow Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP AM Peak Hour MIT
> < ^ t A V i
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown Is maximum after two cycles.

V
Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 160 228 220 378 154 752 121 93 703 57 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.45 0.47 0.75 0.76 0.65 0.47 0.20 0.48 0.54 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh) 48,6 37.6 8.2 55.5 41.0 52.8 27.8 4.3 48.9 31.3 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 48.6 37.6 8.2 55.5 41.0 52.8 27.8 4.3 48.9 31.3 0.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 47 82 0 123 185 86 133 0 52 130 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 101 155 62 #275 #399 167 194 31 109 183 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Tum Bay Length (ft) 230 240 355 300 455 415 205
Base Capacity (vph) 274 493 586 310 498 295 2272 786 292 2251 779 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.32 0.39 0.71 0.76 0.52 0.33 0.15 0.32 0.31 0.07 LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1835
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP AM Peak Hour MIT
iatiojiSummary
> <
WBR; nblt V
.'iSBIi:'
i V
Lane Group Flow (vph) 214 72 197 107 98 32 125 796 81 24 957 207 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.19 0.41 0.39 0.36 0.09 0.38 0.35 0.10 0.15 0.59 0.32 Control Delay (s/veh) 40.5 34.3 8.1 42.9 43.0 0.5 46.9 20.4 1.5 47.1 28.2 5.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 40.5 34.3 8.1 42.9 43.0 0.5 46.9 20.4 1.5 47.1 28.2 5.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 111 35 0 56 52 0 35 101 0 13 169 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 214 83 59 125 117 0 77 202 11 44 256 51 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1383 5362 1272 2582
Tum Bay Length (ft) 250 230 300 100 235 145 250 225
Base Capacity (vph) 557 532 592 468 432 465 352 2380 808 165 2216 805 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.14 0.33 0.23 0.23 0.07 0.36 0.33 0.10 0.15 0.43 0.26 /TfliBpixriTKGSSBlCin
LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1836
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
4: Minnewawa Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP AM Peak Hour MIT
t V i
j.ane Group EBT WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 353 581 125 304 194 298
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.87 0.57 0.67 0.70 0.50
Control Delay (s/veh) 16,2 33.3 38.7 27.6 41.5 20.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 16.2 33.3 38.7 27.6 41.5 20.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 76 166 44 98 68 92
Queue Length 95th (ft) 164 #379 #114 169 #170 158
Internal Link Dist (ft) 517 746 2579 1236
Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 350
Base Capacity (vph) 711 718 229 624 290 689
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.81 0.55 0.49 0.67 0.43
Intersection Summary . ispi
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown Is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1837
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
5: Minnewawa Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP AM Peak Hour MIT
^ t V i
Lane Group mm WBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 185 93 66 479 2 650
v/c Ratio 0.49 0.25 0.32 0.41 0.01 0.62
Control Delay (s/veh) 17,5 18.4 27.0 8.7 23.0 16.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 17.5 18.4 27.0 8.7 23.0 16.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 35 24 19 55 1 153
Queue Length 95th (ft) 82 55 54 205 6 #370
Internal Link DIst (ft) 5362 554 2572 2579
Tum Bay Length (ft) 175 100
Base Capacity (vph) 722 761 209 1226 204 1087
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.12 0.32 0.39 0.01 0.60
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1838
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue Near Term WP_AM Peak Hour MiT > > r t A
V i v
Une Group v. EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT ..

Lane Group Flow (vph) 112 436 288 47 368 239 217 346 39 236 620 155 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.42 0.52 0.27 0.80 0.45 0.80 0.64 0.07 0.83 1.11 0.29 Control Delay (s/veh) 60.6 34.5 21.9 56.0 54.8 11.3 69.4 43.2 0.3 70.5 110.2 16.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 60.6 34.5 21.9 56.0 54.8 11.3 69.4 43.2 0.3 70.5 110.2 16.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 81 143 97 33 254 25 156 229 0 169 --544 35 Queue Length 95th (ft) 148 193 187 77 392 99 #282 366 0 #321 #863 99 Internal Link DIst (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Tum Bay Length (ft) 500 45 220 175 230 425 150
Base Capacity (vph) 328 1117 589 328 559 611 328 559 539 328 559 539 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Splllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.39 0.49 0.14 0.66 0.39 0.66 0.62 0.07 0.72 1.11 0.29 Intersection Summary ^
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentlle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown Is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1839
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour MIT
> > < t A
V i V
|:ane Group EBR WBL ■ NET NBR SBL SET sbMH
Lane Group Flow (vph) 23 163 196 236 363 189 854 292 153 657 43 v/c Ratio 0.15 0.57 0.48 0.77 0.62 0.73 0.55 0.43 0.66 0.44 0.08 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.7 45.2 9.7 56.8 32.4 57.0 28.8 5.3 54.0 28.1 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 45.7 45.2 9.7 56.8 32.4 57.0 28.8 5.3 54.0 28.1 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 12 87 0 129 141 101 150 0 83 114 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 42 168 60 #309 #358 #239 215 59 170 162 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 240 355 300 455 415 205
Base Capacity (vph) 270 484 556 307 590 290 2233 860 293 2255 782 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.34 0.35 0.77 0.62 0.65 0.38 0.34 0.52 0.29 0.05 B'" * i*" ■ " ~ ~ '
iC!i-Tr-rfi-n —- — "-'i-
# 96th percentlle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles,
LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1840
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: WillowAvenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour MIT
> < ^ t V i V
tane Group mm.. .mi NBT NBR ml 'f.
58 251 1094 160 59 827 194

0.14 0.77 0.57 0.22 0.35 0.54 0.32

0.7 43.9 16.2 3.5 30.7 17.4 4.6

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.7 43.9 16.2 3.5 30.7 17.4 4.6
0 42 109 0 19 77 0
0 #106 170 30 52 124 38
1272 2582
100 235 145 250 225
669 328 1929 712 171 1770 679
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.09 0.77 0.57 0.22 0.35 0.47 0.29
Lane Group Flow {vph) 234 131 257 153
v/c Ratio 0.92 0.40 0.56 0.89
Control Delay (s/veh) 76.6 23.8 10.1 78.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 76.6 23.8 10.1 78.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) -108 39 10 51
Queue Length 95th (ft) #243 80 61 #159
Internal Link DIst (ft) 1383
Tum Bay Length (ft) 250 230 300
Base Capacity (vph) 255 648 697 171
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Splllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.20 0.37 0.89
Intersertinn .9i tmmarv
121

0.37 23.3

0.0 23.3
36 75
5362
648
0 0
0 0.19
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1841
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
4: Minnewawa Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour MIT
^ t V i
Lane Group Flow (vph) 413 526 185 410 209 249
v/c Ratio 0.70 0.87 0.68 0.78 0.72 0.46
Control Delay (s/veh) 24.5 36.7 40.6 31.0 41.7 20,2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 24.5 36.7 40.6 31.0 41.7 20.2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 123 171 68 138 77 74
Queue Length 95th (ft) #230 #352 #157 #235 #174 132
Internal Link DIst (ft) 517 456 2579 1236
Tum Bay Length (ft) 300 350
Base Capacity (vph) 639 647 290 642 311 663
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Splllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio
IMreict'on SumfnarV

0.65 0.81 0.64 0.64 0.67 0.38
# 95th percentlle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1842
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
5: Minnewawa Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour MIT
i-ane Group
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
Control Delay (s/veh)
Queue Delay
Total Delay (s/veh)
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Internal Link Dist (ft)
Tum Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
Intersection Summary
239

0.58 20.0

0.0 20.0
46 119
5362
655
0 0
0 0.36
^ t V i
119

0.29 18.7

0.0 18.7
27 73
554
676
0 0
0 0.18
93 0.51
37,8

0.0 37.8
25 #103
175
184
0 0
0 0.51
657

0.64 14.1

0.0 14.1
99 #402
2572
1110
0 0
0 0.59
1 0.01

26.0 0.0

26.0 0
4 100
182
0 0
0 0.01
499

0.63 16.6

0.0 16.6
110
238
2579
1057
0 0
0 0.47
:^«s2tieasMi
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1843
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Near Term WP PM Peak Hour MIT
> > < A t V i V
Lane Group ^ EBR WBL wbt^ WBR- - NBL NBT SBL - SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 199 407 273 33 336 253 296 732 167 500 160 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.37 0.46 0.20 0.82 0.49 0.90 0.59 0.72 0.90 0.29 Control Delay (s/veh) 87.9 36.3 21.6 58.3 62.6 11.9 79.1 34.7 69.5 61.8 10.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 87.9 36.3 21.6 58.3 62.6 11.9 79.1 34.7 69.5 61.8 10.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 167 149 96 26 266 24 245 254 137 397 20 Queue Length 95th (ft) #312 199 185 61 #397 101 #416 339 210 #597 74 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Turn Bay Length (ft) 500 45 220 175 230 425 150
Base Capacity (vph) 241 1117 593 166 476 567 355 1323 308 617 608 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.83 0.36 0.46 0.20 0.71 0.45 0.83 0.55 0.54 0.81 0.26 i^iWctioh Summaiy ■ '
jiirctassiaaarmanznEBSwrr?*; - - -
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1844
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
1: Willow Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour MIT
> >V t A
V i V
Une Group ERt;. mf VVBB NBL.: mc. NBR SBL,
Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 230 275 564 302 347 199 808 273 155 941 59 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.71 0.58 0.87 0.55 0.51 0.85 0.54 0.28 0.74 0.66 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 64.6 52.8 12.3 57.3 36.7 8.6 76.5 31.9 3.6 65.9 34.5 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 64.6 52.8 12.3 57.3 36.7 8.6 76.5 31.9 3.6 65.9 34.5 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 55 141 16 184 172 20 128 164 12 96 195 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #137 241 96 #336 286 103 #299 219 55 #212 257 0 Intemai Link Gist (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Tum Bay Length (ft) 230 240 355 150 300 455 415 205
Base Capacity (vph) 153 431 555 645 606 721 234 1850 964 242 1863 697 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio
intersection Summary'

0.57 0.53 0.50 0.87 0.50 0.48 0.85 0.44 0.28 0.64 0.51 0.08 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1845
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour MIT
Une Group
>
m»',-EBT
>
EBR
r
WBL> ■ WBT ■
t
NBT .NBR
V
SBl^
i
Lane Group Flow (vph) 16 267 187 65 541 288 193 327 36 258 586 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.42 0.28 0.21 0.84 0.42 0.61 0.51 0.06 0.50 0.85 Control Delay (s/veh) 27.1 25.4 4.8 24.0 40.7 9.3 22.8 26.4 2.1 14.5 38.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 27.1 25.4 4.8 24.0 40.7 9.3 22.8 26.4 2.1 14.5 38.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 118 0 26 287 32 55 150 0 77 309 Queue Length 95th (ft) 25 198 45 62 #480 99 #114 244 9 128 #467 Internal Link Dlst (ft) 517 746 2579 1236
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 125 100 150 300 350
Base Capacity (vph) 123 796 783 396 812 808 334 806 721 584 900 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.34 0.24 0.16 0.67 0.36 0.58 0.41 0.05 0.44 0.65 ition Summaty^
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown Is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1846
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
5: MinnewawaAvenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour MIT
> < t V 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 92 272 24 161 104 599 3 1228
v/c Ratio 0.65 0.60 0.18 0.48 0.63 0.38 0.02 0.83
Control Delay (s/veh) 59.5 26.5 38.3 32.5 54.2 14.9 35.3 25.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 59.5 26.5 38.3 32.5 54.2 14.9 35.3 25.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 42 80 11 68 47 88 1 242
Queue Length 95th (ft) #124 176 35 123 #131 148 10 #418 Internal Link Dist (ft) 5362 554 2572 2579
Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 100 175 100
Base Capacity (vph) 141 523 131 486 165 1702 127 1613
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.52 0.18 0.33 0.63 0.35 0.02 0.76 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report
Pages
1847
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour MIT
Lane Group
>
>
-EBR
<
WBb • WBT
V
t V i V
Lane Group Flow (vph) 163 613 552 115 547 350 283 487 323 1080 240 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.74 0.78 0.65 0.72 0.42 0.66 0.51 0.87 0.85 0.37 Control Delay (s/veh) 76.3 47.7 33.7 71.3 49.1 12.5 58.1 38.1 68.0 42.4 15.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 76.3 47.7 33.7 71.3 49.1 12.5 58.1 38.1 68.0 42.4 15.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 124 234 320 88 212 94 110 164 240 390 58 Queue Length 95th (ft) #255 314 469 #186 286 174 163 234 #412 539 138 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Tum Bay Length (ft) 500 45 220 175 230 425 150
Base Capacity (vph) 229 1009 763 183 917 890 563 1089 443 1407 705 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Splllback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.71 0.61 0.72 0.63 0.60 0.39 0.50 0.45 0.73 0.77 0.34 ihfersiecjtion Blimniafy'
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1848
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queuing and Blocking Report
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP AM Peak Hour MIT
Intersection: 9: Project Driveway 3 & Behymer Avenue
)\^ovement WB NB
Directions Served L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 28 103
Average Queue (ft) 3 22
95th Queue (ft) 17 60
Link Distance (ft) 399
Upstream BikTime (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Bik Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
ill
LSA
08/12/2024
SimTraffic Report

1849
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
1: Willow Avenue & Behymer Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour MIT
>
> <
V
A t V i V
^ne Group mi. yuiMLJfliR. m NBR , SBL .
vngQ
Lane Group Flow (vph) 24 282 258 572 277 282 234 966 728 274 712 46 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.79 0.50 0.97 0.41 0.37 0.68 0.67 0.90 1.07 0.59 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 51.3 56,5 8.4 74.4 30.2 5.3 51.9 35.7 27.9 119.4 37.9 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 51.3 56.5 8.4 74.4 30.2 5.3 51.9 35.7 27.9 119.4 37.9 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 178 0 198 124 0 147 211 191 -205 156 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 #308 68 #352 260 64 #264 263 #453 #410 205 0 Intemal Link Dist (ft) 2009 2713 2582 1915
Turn Bay Length (ft) 230 240 355 150 300 455 415 205
Base Capacity (vph) 137 424 559 591 676 756 342 1858 810 257 1978 731 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio
jntersection Summary

0.18 0.67 0.46 0.97 0.41 0.37 0.68 0.52 0.90 1.07 0.36 0.06 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1850
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
2: Willow Avenue &Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour MIT
> > rV
A t V i V
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 473 268 351 259 221 113 287 1445 295 126 956 422 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.60 0.64 0.82 0.87 0.30 0.80 0.92 0.48 0.85 0.63 0.55 Control Delay (s/veh) 71,2 46.3 20.0 66.3 81.5 2.3 67.2 48.4 14.5 94.4 37.2 5.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 71.2 46.3 20.0 66.3 81.5 2.3 67.2 48.4 14.5 94,4 37.2 5.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 344 180 80 185 163 0 108 377 60 93 224 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #551 271 186 #312 #302 3 #168 #467 142 #200 273 75 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1383 5362 1272 2582
Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 230 300 100 235 145 250 225
Base Capacity (vph) 498 443 550 329 253 376 374 1579 620 152 1529 773 Starvation Cap Reducfti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.95 0.60 0.64 0.79 0.87 0.30 0.77 0.92 0.48 0.83 0.63 0.55 Intersection Summary- • ^
# 95th percentlle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
10/09/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1851
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour MIT
(.ane Group
> >
: i/BL ■ WBT^
<

WBR - NBL
t
NBT
A
NBR
V
: SBL'
i
Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 534 194 38 543 240 280 675 69 243 349 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.91 0.34 0.57 0.91 0.40 0.50 0.92 0.10 0.84 0.79 Control Delay (s/veh) 43.3 58.4 17.4 68.6 57.8 15.6 37.0 51.2 8.1 72.7 53.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 43.3 58.4 17.4 68.6 57.8 15.6 37.0 51.2 8.1 72.7 53.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 393 55 24 399 58 171 482 6 185 255 Queue Length 95th (ft) 34 #595 118 #81 #602 129 286 #712 35 #327 332 Internal Link Dist (ft) 517 624 2579 1236
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 125 100 150 300 350
Base Capacity (vph) 73 653 618 75 666 656 566 823 731 311 644 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.25 0.82 0.31 0.51 0.82 0.37 0.49 0.82 0.09 0.78 0.54 |?l!eredctton Siirnmaiy jIi'IIH ifW Vti 1
# 95th percentlle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1852
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
5: Minnewawa Avenue & Perrin Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour MIT
> t V i
Lane Group ^ EBL EBT WBL WET NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 136 345 24 191 169 1177 4 765
v/c Ratio 0.65 0.59 0.18 0.56 0.65 0.69 0.03 0.75
Control Delay (s/veh) 49.9 24.1 38.3 33.5 43.7 18.8 35.5 28.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 49.9 24.1 38.3 33.5 43.7 18.8 35.5 28.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 60 103 10 79 72 184 2 154
Queue Length 95th (ft) #153 224 35 144 #162 #404 11 237 Internal Link DIst (ft) 5362 554 2572 2579
Tum Bay Length (ft) 175 100 175 100
Base Capacity (vph) 217 601 130 483 293 1753 126 1203
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.57 0.18 0.40 0.58 0.67 0.03 0.64 6itersectlon Summary
# 95th percentiie volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1853
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queues
6: Minnewawa Avenue & Shepherd Avenue
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour MIT
Lane Group
>
mm EBT^-
> <
^i/BT
V

WBR -NBL
t
"NBT
V
SBL
i
SBT
V
SBR'
Lane Group Flow (vph) 339 538 464 51 403 346 498 1250 209 728 242 v/c Ratio 0.98 0.61 0.53 0.20 0.67 0.64 0.68 1.02 0.95 0.79 0.45 Control Delay (s/veh) 92.9 44.9 18.6 48.3 52.8 22.5 50.5 68.7 103.2 48.1 14.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 92.9 44.9 18.6 48.3 52.8 22.5 50.5 68.7 103.2 48.1 14.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 263 207 188 35 155 114 186 -518 163 272 43 Queue Length 95th (ft) #480 263 301 77 210 175 #291 #721 #332 349 117 Intemal Link Dist (ft) 1251 861 1224 2572
Turn Bay Length (ft) 500 45 220 175 230 425 150
Base Capacity (vph) 346 1264 881 250 902 538 731 1230 219 1052 588 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spiilback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.98 0.43 0.53 0.20 0.45 0.64 0.68 1.02 0.95 0.69 0.41 Intersection Surfifriary '* , **. ' \ *
~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue Is theoretically infinite.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.

LSA
08/12/2024
Synchro 12 Report

1854
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Queuing and Blocking Report
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
Cumulative Year WP PM Peak Hour MIT
Intersection: 9: Project Driveway 3 & Behymer Avenue
Movement WB N6
Directions Served L R
Maximum Queue (ft) 51 32
Average Queue (ft) 23 9
95th Queue (ft) 44 30
Link Distance (ft) 399
Upstream BIk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage BIk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
LSA
08/12/2024
Simlraffic Report

1855
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Appendix A. California Agricultural LESA Worksheets
NOTES
he Peach and Behymer Residential Project Is a

7.44 acre project site located In unincorporated
resno County, within the City of Clovis Sphere of
ifluence (301). Two soil types have been identified
1 the project site: Ramona sandy loam (Ra) and
an Joaquin sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes,
iajor Land Resource Area (MLRA) 17 (ScA) (refer
I Figure 1: Soils, at the end of the worksheets). The
Dreage of each soli type Is divided by the total
'oject acreage (37.44 acres) to determine the
'oportlon of each soil type on the project site. The
and Capability Classification (LCC) and Storie
tdex for the onslte soils were found on the United
tates Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural
esources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil
urvey.
ccordlng to the USDA NRCS Web Soli Survey, the
LCs for the two soil types are as follows: I for Ra
nd IVs for ScA for Imgated land; and IVc for Ra and
's for ScA for nonlrrigated land. The property
^ners have Indicated that only 7 acres of Ra soil
Ithin the project site are Irrigated via Fresno
rigation District (FID) water deliveries. As such, an
CC value for Irrigated land was used for the 7
:;res of Ra soil that are Irrigated, while the
Dnirrigated LCC value was used for the remaining
:reages of nonlrrigated soil for each soil type in the
'Oject site.

Calculation of the Land Evaluation fLE) Score
Part 1. Land Capability Classification (LCC) Score: (1) Determine ^e total acreage of the project. (2) Determine the soil types within the project area and enter them in Column A of the Land Evaluation Worksheet provided on page 2-A.
(3) Calculate the total acres of each soil type and enter the amounts in Column B. (4) Divide the acres of each soli type (Column B) by the total acreage to determine the proportion of each soil type present. Enter the proportion of each soil type in Column C. (5) Determine the LCC for each soil type from the applicable Soil Survey and enter it in Column D. (6) From the LCC Scorino Table below, determine the point rating corresponding to the LCC for each soil type and enter it in Column E.

LCC Scoring Table
LCC
Class
' lie iis.w iiie iiis,w iVe IVs,w V Vi Vli Vlii
Points 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
(7) Multiply the proportion of each soil type (Column C) by the point score (Column E) and enter the resulting scores in Column F.
(8) Sum the LCC scores in Column F.
(9) Enter the LCC score in box <1 > of the Final LESA Score Sheet on page 10-A.

Part 2. Storie Index Score:
(1) Determine the Storie Index rating for each soil type and enter it in Column G. (2) Multiply the proportion of each soil type (Column C) by the Storie Index rating (Column G) and enter the scores in Column H.
(3) Sum the Storie Index scores in Column H to gain the Storie Index Score. (4) Enter the Storie index Score in box <2> of the Final LESA Score Sheet on page 10-A. 1-A
ccording to the USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey,
amona sandy loam has a Storie Index score of 95,
nd San Joaquin sandy ioam, 0 to 3 percent slopes,
ILRA17 has a Storie index score of 16.
1856
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Land Evaluation Worksheet
Land Capability Classification
(LCC)
and Storie Index Scores
Soil Map
Unit
Project
Acres
Proportion
of
Project Area

LCC LCC
Rating
LCC
Score
Storie
Index
Storie
Index
Score
Ra 29.93 0.7994 IVc 40 31.976 95 75.943
ScA 0.51 0.0136 IVs 40 0.544 16 0.2176
Ra 7.0 0.1870 1 100 18.7 95 17.765
Totals 37.44
(Must Sum
to 1.0)
LCC
Total
Score

51.22 Storie index
Total Score 93.9256
Site Assessment Worksheet 1.

Project Size Score
Total Acres
Project Size
Scores
Highest Project
Size Score
K
LCC Class
l-ll
LCC
Class
III
LCC
Class

IV-VIII

29.93 0.51

7.0 7.0 30.44
0 0
2-A
1857
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

LESA Worksheet (cont.)
NOTES
Column I - 7.0 acres of Class I
soils corresponds to a score of
0 points.

Column K - 30.44 acres of
Class IV soils corresponds to a
score of 0 points.

Calculation of the Site Assessment fSA> Score
Part 1. Project Size Score:.
(1) Using Site Assessment Worksheet 1 provided on page 2-A, enter the acreage of each soil type from Column B In the Column • I, J or K - that corresponds to the LOG for that soil. (Note: While the Project Size Score Is a component of the Site Assessment calculations, the score sheet Is an extension of data collected in the Land Evaluation Worksheet, and is therefore displayed beside it). (2) Sum Column I to determine the total amount of class Iand II soils on the project site. (3) Sum Column J to determine the total amount of class III soils on the project site. (4) Sum Column K to determine the total amount of class IV and lower soils on the project site. (5) Compare the total score for each LOG group in the Project Size Scorina Table below and determine which group receives the highest score.

Class or II Class III Class IV or Lower
Acreage Points Acreage Points Acreage Points
>80 100 >160 100 >320 100
60-79 90 120-159 90 240-319 80
40-59 80 80-119 80 160-239 60
20-39 50 60-79 70 100-159 40
10-19 30 40-59 60 40-99 20
10< 0 20-39 30 40< 0
10-19 10
10< 0
(6) Enter the Project Size Score (the highest score from the three LGG categories) in box <3> of the Final LESA Score Sheet on page 10-A.
3-A
1858
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

LESA Worksheet (cont)
NOTES
he 37.44-acre project site is made up of two parcels,
ssessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) 556-010-28 and
56-010-29.

PN 556-010-29, which represents approximately

3.93 acres of the project site, has an existing
roundwater well that currently provides water to the
roperty owner's existing residence onslte, and was
reviously used for agricultural irrigation; however, the 'ell at this parcel has experienced continued decline in roundwater and is no longer usable for irrigation. This ortion of the project site is also located within the FID oundary and is entitled to receive surface water
eliverles. However, drought conditions in the
sgion have resulted in dwindling surface water
jpplies, and the increasing utility costs for surtece
'ater supplies when available have placed
conomic restrictions on im'gation of the project site,
ince the onslte well was rendered unusable for
gricultural irrigation, and the high cost of FID water
eliverles limits the irrigation water supply for the
ite during non-drought years, only approximately 7
cres of this portion of the site are irrigated via FID water eliverles during non-drought years, while the remaining ind is not irrigated and left fallow. During drought years, rigation is infeasible and agricultural fields within this arcel are left fallow. Therefore, a water resource
vailability score of 45 was used for this portion of the roject site.

PN 556-010-28, which represents approximately

3.51 acres of the project site, does not have an
xlsting water source for im'gation. There are no
roundwater wells located on this parcel. This parcel is ot entitled to receive FID surface water deliveries,
ddltionally, this portion of the project site Is currently utside of the City of Clovis and Is not legally entitled to icelve any municipal water deliveries. Therefore, a
ater resource availability score of 20 was used for
ils portion of the project site.

Part 2. Water Resource Availability Score:
(1) Determine the type(s) of irrigation present on the project site, including a determination of whether there is dryland agricultural activity as well.
(2) Divide the site into portions according to the type or types of irrigation or dryland cropping that is available in each portion. Enter this information in Column B of Site Assessment Wo^sheet 2. - Water Resources Availability.
(3) Determine the proportion of the total site represented for each portion identified, and enter this information in Column C.
(4) Using the Water Resources Availabilitv Scorino Table, identify the option that is most applicable for each portion, based upon the feasibility of irrigation in drought and non-drought years, and whether physical or economic restrictions are likely to exist. Enter the applicable Water Resource Availability Score into Column D.
(5) Multiply the Water Resource Availability Score for each portion by the proportion of the project area it represents to determine the weighted score for each portion in Column E. (6) Sum the scores for all portions to determine the project's total Water Resources Availability Score (7) Enter the Water Resource Availability Score in box <4> of the Final LESA Score Sheet on page 10-A.
4-A
1859
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Site Assessment Worksheet 2. - Water Resources Availability

A B C D
Project
Portion
Water
Source
Proportion of
Project Area
Water
Availability
Score
Weighted
Availability
Score
(C X D)
1 FID Surface Water Delivery 0.6392 45 28.764
2 None Available 0.3608 20 7.216
3 4
5 6
(Must Sum
to 1.0)
Total Water
Resource
Score

35.98 5-A
1860
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Water Resource Availability Scoring Table
Option
Non-Drought Years Drought Years
WATER

RESOURCE
SCORE

RESTRICTIONS RESTRICTIONS
irrigated
Production
Feasible?
Physical
Restrictions
?
Economic
Restrictions
?
Irrigated
Production
Feasible?
Physical
Restrictions
?
Economic
Restrictions
?
1 YES NO NO YES NO NO 100
2 YES NO NO YES NO YES 95
3 YES NO YES YES NO YES 90
4 YES NO NO YES YES NO 85
5 YES NO NO YES YES YES 80
6 YES YES NO YES YES NO 75
7 YES YES YES YES YES YES 65
8 YES NO NO NO 50
9 YES NO YES NO 45
10 YES YES NO NO 35
11 YES YES YES NO 30
12 Irrigated production not feasible, but rainfall adequate for dryland production in both drought and non-drought years
25 13 Irrigated production not feasible, but rainfall adequate for dryland production in non-drought years (but not in drought years) 20 14 Neither irrigated nor dryland production feasible 0 6-A
1861
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

LESA Worksheet (cont.)
NOTES
As shown in Figure 2, the totai acreage
of the Zone of influence (ZOI) is 496.25
acres, and 461.45 acres of the ZOI are
under agricultural production (based on
the California Department of
Conservation Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program). Approximately 93
percent of the ZOI is under agricultural
production. Therefore, the Surrounding
Agricultural Land Score equates to 100
points.

Part 3. Surrounding Agricultural Land Use Score:
(1) Calculate the project's Zone of Influence (ZOI) as follows:
(a) a rectangle is drawn around the project such that the rectangle is the smallest that can completely encompass the project area.
(b) a second rectangle is then drawn which extends one quarter mile on all sides beyond the first rectangle.
(c) The ZOI includes all parcels that are contained within or are intersected by the second rectangle, less the area of the project itself.
(2) Sum the area of all parcels to determine the total acreage of the ZOI. (3) Determine which parcels are in agricultural use and sum the areas of these parcels (4) Divide the area in agriculture found in step (3) by the total area of the ZOI found in step (2) to determine the percent of the ZOI that is in agricultural use.
(5) Determine the Surrounding Agricultural Land Score utilizing the Surrounding Agricultural Land Scoring Table below.

Surrounding Agricultural Land Scoring Table
Percent of ZOI
in
Agriculture
Surrounding
Agricultural
Land Score
90-100 100
80-89 90
75-79 80
70-74 70
65-69 60
60-64 50
55-59 40
50-54 30
45-49 20
40-44 10
<40 0
I (5) Enter the Surrounding Agricultural Land Score in box <5> of the Final LESA Score Sheet on page 10-A. 7-A
1862
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Site Assessment Worksheet 3.

Surrounding Agricuitural Land and Surrounding Protected Resource Land B
Zone of Influence
Surrounding
Agricultural
Land Score
(From Table)
Surrounding
Protected
Resource
Land Score
(From Table)
Total Acres Acres In
Agriculture
Acres of
Protected
Resource
Land
Percent in
Agriculture
(A/B)
Percent
Protected
Resource Land
(A/C)
496.25 461.45 0 93 0 100 0
8-A
1863
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

LESA Worksheet (cont.)
NOTES
\s shown in Figure 3, the total acreage
)f the ZOI Is 496.25 acres. No portion of
he ZOI consists of protected resource
ands, defined as Williamson Act
:ontracted lands; publicly owned lands
nalntained as park, forest, or watershed
esources; and lands with agricultural,
vlldllfe habitat, open space, or other
latural resource easements that restrict
he conversion of such land to urban or
ndustrial uses. As such, the
Surrounding Protected Resource Score
equates to 0 points.

Part 4. Protected Resource Lands Score:

The Protected Resource Lands scoring relies upon the same Zone of Influence information gathered in Part 3, and figures are entered in Site Assessment Worksheet 3, which combines the surrounding agricultural and protected lands calculations.
(1) Use the total area of the ZOI calculated in Part 3. for the Surrounding Agricultural L^nd Use score. (2) Sum the area of those parcels within the ZOI that are protected resource lands, as defined in the California Agricultural LESA Guidelines.
(3) Divide the area that is determined to be protected in Step (2) by the total acreage of the ZOI to determine the percentage of the surrounding area that Is under resource protection. (4) Determine the Surrounding Protected Resource Land Score utilizing the Surrounding Protected Resource Land Scoring Table below.

Surrounding Protected Resource Land Scoring Table
Percent of ZOI
Protected
Protected Resource
Land Score
90-100 100
80-89 90
75-79 80
70-74 70
65-69 60
60-64 50
55-59 40
50-54 30
45-49 20
40-44 10
<40 0
I (5) Enter the Protected Resource Land score in box <6> of the Final LESA Score Sheet on page 10-A. 9-A
1864
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

LESA Worksheet (cont)
NOTES
e component LE and SA factors have been
tered into the Final LESA Score Sheet.

Final LESA Score Sheet
Calculation of the Final LESA Score:
(1) Multiply each factor score by the factor weight to determine the weighted score and enter in Weighted Factor Scores column.
(2) Sum the weighted factor scores for the LE factors to determine the total LE score for the project. (3) Sum the weighted factor scores for the SA factors to determine the total SA score for the project. (4) Sum the total LE and SA scores to determine the Final LESA Score for the project. e LE factor scores are multiplied by the factor
sights to determine the weighted score for
ch. The weighted LE factor scores are
mmed to determine the LE portion of the Final
;SA score.
e SA factor scores are multiplied by the factor
sights to determine the weighted score for
ch. The weighted SA factor scores are
mmed to deteimine the SA portion of the Final
;SA score.
e LE and SA subtotals are summed to
termlne the Final LESA Score. The
lai LESA Score for the proposed
3ject is 56.6834 points. A final score between
to 59 points is considered significant only if
5 LE and SA subscores are each greater than
equal to 20 points. Both the LE and SA
bscores for the project are greater than 20
ints. Therefore, the LESA Model concludes
it the conversion of the agricultural land
rime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide
portance, and Farmland of Local Importance)
the project site to a non-agriculturai use
luld constitute a significant impact.

Factor
Scores
LE Factors
Land Capability 22 Classification "
Storie "=2> 939256
Index
LE
Subtotal
SA Factor^
Project <3>
Size
Water Resource <4> A -I oo.yo Availability
Surrounding <5>
Agricultural Land
Protected
Resource Land ^
SA
Subtotal
Factor
Weight
Final LESA
Score
Weighted
Factor
Scores

12.805

23.4814

36.2864

20.397

56.6834
For further information on the scoring thresholds under the California Agricultural LESA Model, consult Section 4 of the Instruction Manual.
1865
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

HhHI' -i' •
»» I Hljiiliiiilii'r':! ' I •■■l\' II ■ —^T,, ~ J^.S5&',V:!BS5iW; ' '' ■ II
Ih if!
W|v); U' I'ii'.TSIT
> yi*
liVY^,.V.*:

I •••♦i
•HtOi
liiliiillpflii
^■mit
LSA
Project Location • 37.44 aaes FIGURE 1
I
Soils
2CO
SOuaCE: Nearmap (02/202i): USDA SSUR60 I2024J
Ra - Ramona sandy loam - 36.93 acres
ScA • San Joaquin sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. MLRA 17 • 0.51 acres Peach and Behymer Residential Project
Soils
l:\202417CO Or Young Peach ftchytw\6IS\ProtPcach and Bchyrrer Actidomial PiojcctNPrach and Bchymcr RcsidrnHal Projocl-aprK (5/17/2024) 1866
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
r • -T: -'i- r ^S, .«''i i
. ' • t.t •/«. •"■• • -•
•y}'-' I
3i7?mKS!B5W >-i»i;ii'M«Ul
Y«*
f^-., •< 1: .- ,.- ,f, „.^...
ir •, • ■ •"••:•• -y
Wi
Agricultural Lands within Zone of Influence
Prime Farmland - 256.29 acres
Farmland of Statewide Importance - 39
Farmland of Local Importance • 9S.28 aaes
Unique Farmland • 70.17 acres
Rural Residenhat Land • 34.53 acres
Urban and Bullt-Up Land - 0.27 acres
Agricultural Lands with Project Location
Prime Farmland - 36.80 acres
Farmland of Statewide Importance - 0.51 acres
Farmland of Local Importance - 0.06 acres
Rural Residential Land • 0.07 acres
Project Location • 37.44 acres
Zone of Influence • 496.25 acres
I
FIGURE 2
D
FEET
SOURCE: USGS The N.itfonal Map (2018)
Peach and Behymer Residential Project
Zone of Influence Agricultural Lands
li\20241700 Of Vnung Prach Brhvmpr\GIS\PTD\Pc.ifh .inri ScHymcf Rr^idrfitial ProjPCt\Prnch and Brhymcr Residential Project aprx (5/15/2024) 1867
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
m
y
. ...
« - r •
m.w^^
m!f;iir:;;;j';;:j;.V^ ;,g ■-^w.
;,•'!:: li"■ ' ■■.* •' w
5nTOS:«?w
. ,■ F lit'ii'iltirmiijit]
l»i
M m
.UrVil"- '
.f
!-t'r.<
LSA
I
Project Location - 37.44 acres
Zone of Influence • 496.25 acres
Williamson Act Enrollment 2023
Prime Agriculture Land
^ Nonprime Agriculture Land
Nonrenewal
Farmland Securitv Zone
Mixed Enrollment Agriculture Land

FIGURES
SOURCE; Ncarmap (02/20241; COOC (2023)
Peach and Behymer
Residential Project
Zone of Influence Protected Resource Lands
l:\202417CO [><■ Young Pcjch Brhyrrrr\GIS\RTo\P<'ach and BrhymcT Residential ProjcctVPcadi and Bchyrncr Rrs drntial Project.aprx (S/tS/2024) 1868
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

This page intentionally left blank
1869
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN

PEACH-BEHYMER SOUTHEAST REORGANIZATION
RO311
City of Clovis Peach-Behymer Southeast Reorganization
December 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
Attachment 11

P L A N N I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T
1 0 3 3 F I F T H S T R E E T • C L O V I S , C A 9 3 6 1 2

1.1 INTRODUCTION
A Site Specific Service Plan for providing services and improvements to land being annexed to the City is required by the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo). The site specific service plan provides assurance to LAFCo that newly annexed land to the City will be properly served as urban territory.

The service plan also provides information to property owners, districts and interesting parties who may have projects underway within the vicinity of the proposed annexation.

On November 21, 2024, the Clovis Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing and adopted a resolution recommending approval of the following applications:
a. Adoption of an environmental finding of a mitigated negative declaration and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program for Reorganization (RO) 311, Prezone (R) 2024-002, Vesting Tentative Tract Map (TM) 6482, and Planned Development Permit (PDP) 2024-002. b. Rezone 2024-006, approving a request to prezone the properties within the annexation area from the Fresno County AE-20 Zone District to the Clovis R-1-PRD Zone District. c. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6482, approving a request for a 266-lot single-family planned residential development on approximately 37.92 acres of land subject to the City Council’s approval of the annexation.
d. Planned Development Permit 2024-002, approving a request to approve a planned development permit for a 266-lot single-family residential development.

On December 16, 2024, the Clovis City Council conducted a noticed public hearing and took action to approve the following applications:
a. Adoption of an environmental finding of a mitigated negative declaration and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program for Reorganization (RO) 311, Prezone (R) 2024-002, Vesting Tentative Tract Map (TM) 6482, and Planned Development Permit (PDP) 2024-002. b. Rezone 2024-006, approving a request to prezone the properties within the annexation from the Fresno County AE-20 Zone District to the Clovis R-1-PRD Zone District. c. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6482, approving a request for a 266-lot single-family planned residential development on approximately 37.92 acres of land subject to the City Council’s approval of the annexation.
1870
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization December 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
d. Planned Development Permit 2024-002, approving a request to approve a planned development permit for a 266-lot single-family residential development.

On December 16, 2024, the Clovis City Council adopted a resolution addressing Reorganization RO311, requesting the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) take proceedings for the reorganization of the territory known as the Peach-Behymer Southeast Reorganization.

1.2 SERVICES EXISTING OR PROPOSED

1. Community Water Service
The Water Master Plan Update, completed in 2017, by Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group, was prepared to support the 2014 Clovis General Plan, and the development plans therein. The plan examined the feasibility of continued growth in the greater Clovis area from a water resource perspective. This included a review of existing and future demands for water from surface, groundwater, and reclaimed water. The study area corresponded with the General Plan planning area. The 2015 Urban Water Management Plan updated the water supply and demand issues identified in the 2017 Master Plan.

The City and Tarpey Village have 37 domestic water wells to provide for the needs of its residents. Some of these have wellhead treatment facilities to treat contaminated groundwater. The wells discharge water into a distribution main grid, based on a minimum of 12-inch mains, spaced at half-mile intervals. The present water storage facilities consist of one elevated tank and three ground level tanks. The total storage capacity is 7 million gallons.

The City began operations of the Surface Water Treatment Facility, located on the Enterprise Canal on the east side of Clovis, in 2004. Kings River water is supplied to the plant via Fresno Irrigation District’s (FID) Enterprise Canal. This 15 million gallon-per-day (MGD) plant allows Clovis to serve existing users and new growth areas, while lessening the demand on groundwater. In 2014, treatment capacity at the SWTF was increased to 22.5 MGD.

In 2009, the City began operation of the Water Reuse Facility (WRF) to treat wastewater from a portion of the City’s growth areas. In 2012, the City began using recycled water from this facility to irrigate public landscapes. At build-out of the system, this facility will be able to produce 8.4 MGD of recycled water.

The strategy for future water supply is termed “conjunctive use” where multiple elements are used to provide a secure long-term supply. It includes using both groundwater and treated surface water to ensure a secure drought-resistant water supply with the flexibility to use surface and groundwater supplies in a cost and operationally-efficient manner. This strategy is conducive to phased development that is critical to both community approval and existing operational constraints.

Water systems for newly developed areas, such as the project site, will be financed by development fees, assessment districts, and capital facilities funding. Additional surface water supplies for certain growth areas will be financed by the Water Supply development fee.

2. Water
The following water conditions have been placed on the project:

1. The applicant shall identify and abandon all water wells to City standards.

2. The applicant shall install water mains of the sizes and in the locations indicated below, and provide an adequately looped water system prior to occupancy. The water improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of 1871
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization December 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
existing improvements. Any alternative routing of the mains shall require approval of the City Engineer and shall be supported by appropriate calculations. a. Behymer Avenue – install 16" main along between Peach and Minnewawa Avenues. b. Behymer Avenue – install 16” main between Minnewawa and Clovis Avenues. c. Behymer Avenue – install 12” main between Willow and Peach Avenues. d. Behymer Avenue – install 24” main between Clovis and Baron Avenues e. Perrin Avenue – install 12” main between Willow and Chapel Hill Avenues. f. Palisde Avenue – install 12” main between Chapel Hill and Peach Avenues g. Peach Avenue – install 12” main between Palisade and Behymer Avenues. h. Interior Streets – install 8”mains.
i. Install water storage tank T-6 per the Water Master Plan. The City Engineer shall determine the timing for the installation of T-6 by a future City CIP project.

3. The applicant shall install a City standard water service to each lot of the proposed subdivision.

Water services shall be grouped at property lines to accommodate automatic meter reading system, including installation of connecting conduit. The water meter shall be placed in the sidewalk and not in planters or driveways.

4. All existing water services that will not be used with this development shall be abandoned by closing the service’s corporation stop and creating a physical separation between the corporation stop and the service.

5. The applicant shall notify all property owners’ annexed to the City and along streets where a new water main will be constructed to determine if they wish to be connected to City water.

Property owners shall work directly with the applicant regarding costs and location. The applicant shall notify property owners that water connection fees are required if they choose to connect.

6. Prior to recording a final map of any phase, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Fire Chief and City Engineer that there is adequate water pressure to serve the units to be constructed. The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to determine the adequacy of water supply/pressure for the proposed development.

7. Applicant acknowledges that water distribution and treatment capacity for the area within which the proposed subdivision is located is extremely limited, and that distribution may not be available to provide service for the proposed subdivision at such time as applicant is ready to seek approval of a final map. Applicant acknowledges, understands, and agrees that if such water distribution and treatment capacity is not available to serve the proposed subdivision, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis, the final map may not be approved. Notwithstanding the foregoing, applicant has freely and voluntarily chosen to proceed with the submittal and processing of the tentative map, intends to expend money, time and effort in connection therewith, and accepts the risks that the final map approval may be delayed until sufficient distribution is available as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis. Applicant agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Clovis from any and all claims, costs, expenses, and damages incurred or suffered by applicant, its principals, officers, employees, agents, or contractors, caused by, in connection with, or arising out of the unavailability of water distribution or treatment capacity to serve the proposed subdivision, or the City’s refusal or failure to approve a final map for the proposed subdivision because of the unavailability of water distribution or treatment capacity. 1872
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization December 2024 Site Specific Service Plan

3. Recycled Water
The following recycled water conditions have been placed on the project:

8. The applicant shall install recycled water mains of the sizes and in the locations indicated below. The recycled water improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements. All areas utilizing recycle water for irrigation shall be clearly marked on the improvement plans. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Any alternative routing of the mains shall require approval of the City Engineer and may require appropriate calculations. a. Paseos, Trails, and Neighborhood Parks – install mains as necessary to serve the paseos, trails, and the neighborhood parks.

4. Wastewater
The Fresno-Clovis Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility serves the Fresno and Clovis urban area from its location southwest of the two cities. The City of Clovis owns and maintains sewer lines within the City Sphere of Influence, with the exception of the Tarpey Village area, which is maintained by the City of Fresno.

The City operates the Water Reuse Facility which treats wastewater from a portion of the City and provides recycled water for use in public landscapes. This facility will be expanded as required to serve portions of the northwest and northeast growth areas. The City does not have sewer collection facilities constructed for the entire current Sphere of Influence at this time, but all areas have been master planned.

The Clovis Wastewater Master Plan Update in 2017 provided the City with a course of action with respect to wastewater service needs through the year 2035, in keeping with the Clovis General Plan.

Wastewater facilities for newly developed areas will be financed by development fees, assessment districts, and capital facilities funding.

The following sewer conditions have been placed on the project:

9. The applicant shall identify and abandon all septic systems to City standards.

10. The applicant shall install sanitary sewer mains of the size and in the locations indicated below, prior to occupancy. The sewer improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Any alternative routing of the mains shall require approval of the City Engineer and shall be supported by appropriate calculations. The improvements indicated below will provide temporary service until the improvements are installed that provide permanent service.
a. Behymer Avenue – install 16" main along between Peach and Minnewawa Avenues. b. Peach Avenue – install 12” main between Pallisade and Behymer Avenues. c. Interior Streets – install 8" mains.

11. The applicant shall install one (1) 4" sewer service house branch to each lot within the tentative tract.

12. All existing sewer services that will not be used with this development shall be abandoned by cutting and capping the service at the right-of-way line.
1873
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization December 2024 Site Specific Service Plan

13. The applicant shall notify all property owners annexed to the City and along streets where a new sewer main will be constructed to determine if they wish to be connected to City sewer. Property owners shall work directly with the applicant regarding costs and location. The applicant shall notify property owners that sewer connection fees are required if they choose to connect.

14. The City cannot guarantee at this time that sewer capacity will be available for this development when site construction occurs. The applicant, therefore, waives any claim or demand against the City for any delay in availability of sewer capacity for this subdivision.

15. Applicant acknowledges that sewage collection and treatment capacity for the area within which the proposed subdivision is located is extremely limited, and that capacity may not be available to provide service for the proposed subdivision at such time as applicant is ready to seek approval of a final map. Applicant acknowledges, understands, and agrees that if such sewage collection and treatment capacity is not available to serve the proposed subdivision, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis, the final map may not be approved. Notwithstanding the foregoing, applicant has freely and voluntarily chosen to proceed with the submittal and processing of the tentative map, intends to expend money, time and effort in connection therewith, and accepts the risks that the final map approval may be delayed until sufficient capacity is available as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis. Applicant agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Clovis from any and all claims, costs, expenses, and damages incurred or suffered by applicant, its principals, officers, employees, agents, or contractors, caused by, in connection with, or arising out of the unavailability of sewage collection or treatment capacity to serve the proposed subdivision, or the City’s refusal or failure to approve a final map for the proposed subdivision because of the unavailability of sewage collection or treatment.

5. Dedications and Street Improvements
The following street conditions have been placed on the project:

16. The applicant shall provide right-of-way acquisition or dedicate free and clear of all encumbrances and/or improve the following streets to City standards. The street improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s specific plans and shall match existing improvements. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the type, location, and grades of existing improvements. a. Behymer Avenue – Along frontage between Minnewawa Ave and Peach Ave, dedicate to provide right-of-way acquisition for 58' (exist 20' south) south of section line and 27’ (exist 20’) north of section line, and improve with curb, gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, curb return ramps, street lights, fiber optic conduit, median island, median island landscaping and irrigation, landscape strip, 39' (28’ South of centerline + 11’ North of centerline) permanent paving, permanent paving and overlay as necessary to match the existing permanent pavement, 3' paved swale, and transitional paving as needed.
b. Minnewawa Avenue – Along frontage, dedicate to provide right-of-way acquisition for

70.5' (exist 30') west of section line and 24.5’ (exist 30’) east of section line, and improve with curb, gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, curb return ramps, street lights, fiber optic conduit, median island, median island landscaping and irrigation, landscape strip, 29' (22.5’ West of centerline +16.5’ East of centerline) permanent paving, permanent paving and overlay as necessary to match the existing permanent pavement, 3' paved swale, and transitional paving as needed. c. Peach Avenue – Along frontage, dedicate to provide right-of-way acquisition for 56.5' (exist 30') east of section line and 24.5’ (exist 30’) west of section line, and improve with curb, gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, curb return ramps, street lights, fiber optic conduit, median island, median island landscaping and irrigation, landscape 1874
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization December 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
strip, 39' (22.5’ East of centerline +16.5’ West of centerline) permanent paving, permanent paving and overlay as necessary to match the existing permanent pavement, 3' paved swale, and transitional paving as needed. d. Interior Streets – Dedicate to provide for 50’ or 54’ of right-of-way in conformance with the City policy on street widths, and improve with curb, gutter, 5’ sidewalk adjacent to the curb, drive approaches, curb return ramps, streetlights, permanent paving, and all transitional paving as needed.
e. Entry feature streets with median islands shall have a minimum of 22’ wide travel lanes in each direction with parking or without parking. f. Temporary Turnabouts – Dedicate to provide for a 48' radius and install 45' of permanent/temporary paving plus 3' paved swale.
g. Install a traffic signal at Behymer and Minnewawa Avenues and provide the necessary right-of-way for the signal in its ultimate location.
h. Install all-way stop signs at Behymer and Peach Avenues. i. Provide for the design of a traffic signal at Minnewawa and Perrrin Avenues. j. The applicant shall relinquish all access to Peach, Behymer, and Minnewawa Avenues.

17. The applicant shall provide a dedication for a 10' public utility easement, where applicable, along all public frontages. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining approval by the utilities companies where alternate widths are provided. The applicant shall provide to the City copies of all final easements prior to final map acceptance.

18. For new onsite ADA paths of travel that connect to the City sidewalk, the applicant shall replace enough sidewalk to provide a compliant landing with appropriate transitions to existing sidewalk grades.

19. The applicant shall remove and repair all damaged or broken concrete improvements. The City Engineer may require the repair of additional improvements if they are damaged prior to occupancy.

20. The applicant shall not install any fences, temporary or permanent in public right-of-way.

21. The applicant shall provide preliminary title report, legal description and drawings for all dedications required which are not on the site. All contact with owners, appraisers, etc. of the adjacent properties where dedication is needed shall be made only by the City. The City will prepare an estimate of acquisition costs including but not limited to appraised value, appraisal costs, negotiation costs, and administrative costs. The applicant shall pay such estimated costs as soon as they are determined by the City.

22. The sideyard side of all corner lots shall have full width sidewalk except where planter strips or meandering sidewalk is proposed.

23. The applicant shall obtain "R Value" tests in quantity sufficient to represent all street areas, and have street structural sections designed by a registered civil engineer based on these "R Value" tests.

24. The applicant shall, at the ends of any permanent pavement abutting undeveloped property, install 2" x 6" redwood header boards that shall be placed prior to the street surfacing. 1875
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization December 2024 Site Specific Service Plan

25. Standard barricades with reflectors shall be installed at ends of streets abutting undeveloped property and any other locations to be specified by the City Engineer.

6. Solid Waste Collection
Refuse Collection collects and disposes of solid waste generated by residential and commercial customers located within the City. Private vendors, under City contract, collect waste from select commercial customers and recyclables and yard wastes from residential customers. For improved cost accounting and control, the Refuse Collection Unit is further organized into four sub-accounts identified as Administration, Residential, Commercial, and Community Cleanup.

Refuse Landfill conducts all operations necessary to landfill City refuse in accordance with county, state, and federal requirements. The Clovis landfill is an active Class III landfill which accepts municipal solid waste that is currently permitted through the year 2053.

Refuse Contracts provides refuse-related services to the community through contracts with private vendors.

These include refuse compactor and roll-off services for larger businesses, and residential curbside recycling, and greenwaste programs.

7. Fire Protection
The Fire Department employs two primary measures in determining service for the community and future development. The first measure is distribution. “Distribution” describes station locations that allow for a rapid first-due response deployment to mitigate fire and medical aid emergencies before they result in further life/property loss. Distribution is measured by how much of the jurisdiction is covered by first due units within our adopted response time goal of arrival within 5 minutes or less 90% of the time. The second term, “concentration” is a measure of how many multiple units are within sufficient proximity to provide the necessary tools, equipment and personnel, known as an effective response force, for a large scale incident or when another unit is assigned to a concurrent emergency. An initial effective response force is one that has been determined likely to stop the escalation of a fire emergency and bring it effectively under control.

In addition to these factors, Clovis Fire has conducted several station location studies over the last ten years to ensure efficient and effective operations. Stations have generally been located in between 4.5 to 5 mile squares near major street intersections. Previous studies identified various station configurations that could serve City growth depending on the type of development and infrastructure planned for these areas. Currently, the Clovis Fire Department operates out of five fire stations located throughout the City.

In determining desired levels of resource concentration to maintain existing standards and to provide equal protection to future growth areas, the Clovis Fire Department analyzed the risk assessment, call volume, population, critical task analysis, and industry standards. Depending on the factors previously noted, the number of units needed for an initial effective response force are dispatched as defined in the Critical Task Analysis document.

Consideration for community protection must also take into account utilization of Automatic Aid Agreements that provide the closest available resources, regardless of jurisdiction. Using software programs and data from neighboring jurisdictions, fire staff are able to analyze the concentration of units revealing detailed information regarding the deployment of resources necessary to provide an effective fire fighting force within defined response time goals for a geographic area neighboring other fire protection districts.

The Emergency Services Bureau is responsible for providing the resources needed by Fire Department staff who respond daily to requests for emergency and non-emergency services from the citizens of Clovis through four divisions: Operations, Support Services, Training, and Communications. The Operations Division activities include: responding to fires, first responder medical services, mutual/automatic aid, mapping, apparatus replacement, etc. The Training Division activities include coordination of recruitment, 1876
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization December 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
testing and training of new employees, in-service training for all Department employees and coordinated use of the Fire Training Center. Support Services Division activities include: apparatus maintenance, facilities maintenance, station supplies, etc. The Communications Division has responsibility for coordinating dispatch services to the Fire Department. Fire dispatch services are provided via a contract with the Fresno County Emergency Medical Services Division. Dispatch services coordinate the emergency response of all City fire resources and mutual or automatic aid resources. The Department continues to promote sound planning, economic efficiency, and effective use of the City resources while providing essential and valuable services.

The Life Safety and Enforcement Bureau is responsible for providing community risk reduction activities through two divisions: Fire Prevention and Emergency Preparedness. The Fire Prevention Division assists local businesses and building development though activities such as inspections and plan review to ensure safe occupancies comply with fire codes, standards, and local ordinances. Additional risk reduction is performed through public education where citizens learn about actions they can take to reduce their fire risk and learn emergency preparedness skills that are essential during times of crisis. Within the Bureau, the Investigations team has the responsibility to investigate all fires for cause and origin, and enforce minimum standards to safeguard life, health, property, and public welfare.

The Emergency Preparedness Division has the responsibility for preparing and carrying out emergency plans to protect property and the citizens of Clovis in case of actual or threatened conditions of disaster or extreme peril. This includes having an emergency plan in place, maintaining an Emergency Operations Center (EOC), ensuring policies and procedures are compliant with the National Incident Management System (NIMS) guidelines and exercises are conducted to evaluate system effectiveness. Within the Emergency Preparedness section are the Hazardous Materials Response Team and an Urban Search and Rescue Team. These teams are capable of responding to emergency incidents that require specialized tools, equipment, and personnel. Some funding for this division is augmented by state and federal grants.

The Fire Administration Division is responsible for supporting all department operations, administering the Accreditation program, and the development and administration of the Fire Department budget. Fire Administration provides administrative analysis, report preparation, coordination of programs, incident response data management, timekeeping, and other routine duties performed daily that support the delivery of emergency and non-emergency services. Fire Administration also identifies, writes, and manages grants to supplement funding for all Department programs.

The following fire conditions have been placed on the project:

26. Two Points of Access: Any development to this parcel will require a minimum of two (2) points of access to be reviewed and approved by the Clovis Fire Department. All required access drives shall remain accessible during all phases of construction which includes paving, concrete work, underground work, landscaping, perimeter walls. Developments of one- or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads.

27. Street Width for Single Family Residences: Minimum Access Road Width of 36 feet for Single Family Residences. Roads 36 feet or wider allow for Parking on both sides of street.

28. Exception Streets with houses on only one side of the street: Roads 32 feet or greater, to less than 36 feet in width require Fire Lane Markings on one side of the street. Parking is allowed on one side of street.

29. Street Width: Fire apparatus access width shall be determined by measuring from “base of curb” to “base of curb” for roadways that have curbs. When roadways do not have curbs, the measurements shall be from the edge of the roadway surface (approved all weather surface). 1877
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization December 2024 Site Specific Service Plan

30. Turning Radius: All access way roads constructed shall be designed with a minimum outside turning radius of forty-five feet (45’).

31. Temporary Street Signs: The applicant shall install temporary street signs that meet City Temporary Street Sign Standard #1.9 prior to issuance of building permits within a subdivision.

32. All Weather Access &Water Supply: The applicant shall provide all weather access to the site during all phases of construction to the satisfaction of the approved Clovis Fire Department Standard #1.2 or #1.3.

33. Private Street Names: Private street names shall be consistent with public street names to the north and south or to the east and west alignments as approved by the Fire Department.

34. Fire Access – Landscape Obstruction: Landscaping trees or shrubs located adjacent to the fire access drives shall be of the type that will not impede fire access due to their growth process.

35. Residential Fire Hydrant: 4 ½” x 2 ½” approved Residential Type fire hydrant(s) and “Blue Dot” hydrant locators, paint fire hydrant(s) yellow with blue top and caps, and paint the curb red shall be installed as specified by the adopted Clovis Fire Department Standard #1.4. Plans shall be submitted to the Clovis Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. The hydrants shall be charged and in operation prior to any framing or combustible material being brought onto the site. Hydrants curb markings and blue dots to be completed prior to occupancy of any homes.

36. Looped Water Main: The applicant shall install approved looped water main capable of the necessary flow of water for adequate fire protection and approved by the Clovis Fire Department.

8. Law Enforcement
The responsibility of the Police Department is to provide protection and police-related services to the community. The Department’s mission is to do this in a manner that builds public confidence and improves the quality of life in Clovis. Police headquarters is located at the Clovis Civic Center. Currently, the Police Department is allotted for 112 sworn officers. The current ratio is 0.90 sworn officers per 1,000 residents.

In accordance with the recommendations contained in the Police Department Master Service Plan, the Police Department will seek funding to achieve and maintain a ratio of 1.3 officers per 1,000 residents.

Police protection to the unincorporated areas is provided by the Fresno County Sheriff and California Highway Patrol. The City has a mutual aid assistance agreement with both agencies.

The operations of the Police Department, now and as the City grows, will be funded through the General Fund, Community Facilities District (CFD) fund, and grants. It is noted that continued annexation and development without proportionate increase in the funding of safety services will have an effect on the city’s ability to maintain acceptable service levels. If unable to maintain acceptable service levels, the department will have to reduce response to certain calls and possibly eliminate other services altogether. This reduction of services will greatly impact our citizens and the quality of life in our community.

The Department is organized into three major divisions, which are composed of seven budgetary sections.

The following Police Department conditions have been placed on the project:

37. Construction work shall be limited to the hours set forth in the Clovis Municipal Code. (CMC §

5.27.604.)

38. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain the structures and adjoining fences to the project free of graffiti. All forms of graffiti shall be removed within 48 hours. (CMC §§

5.27.101.)
1878
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization December 2024 Site Specific Service Plan

39. Emergency phone numbers for responsible parties shall be kept current during the building phase of the project.

40. All construction materials shall be located within a secured area or monitored by security staff during non-construction hours.

9. Parks & Recreation
The Parks Section provides maintenance to City parks, trails and trail lighting, street landscaping, City trees, and numerous recreational facilities, including playgrounds and picnic sites; maintains Old Town streetscape; and provides grounds maintenance at City administrative facilities. Some of these areas are maintained by Parks personnel, while others are maintained through contracts administered by the Parks section. Parks also provides support for civic activities such as hanging banners and decorating for Christmas, Rodeo Weekend, Big Hat Days, and Farmer's Market. The Parks Section administers the Landscape Maintenance District (LMD), which provides funding for maintenance of certain parks, trails, street landscaping, streetlights, and neighborhood architectural enhancement features for areas within the Landscape Maintenance District. All City owned landscaping that is not within the LMD is funded through the General Fund.

10. Transit Services
The Community Services Division administers various senior citizen programs at the Clovis Senior Activity Center. The Division also administers the City’s Round-Up demand-response transit program, the fixedroute Stageline transit program, and administers the City’s contract with Fresno Area Express (FAX). User fees, and state and federal transit funds and grants support the transit service.

11. Storm Drainage
Storm Drain responds to significant rainfall events by providing sand bags, pumping of flooded areas, monitoring stream channels, placing warning signage, and pumping temporary storm drain basins when needed. It also provides pre-storm cleaning of drain inlets to ensure debris do not hamper proper operation of the storm drain collection system. As development occurs, applicants will be required to construct storm drainage facilities in accordance with the standard and requirements of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District. Specific conditions for improvements to the storm drainage system will be issued as development projects are proposed and approved.

12. Street Lighting
The City is responsible for maintenance of traffic signals, the cost of energy/repairs/replacements for PG&Eowned streetlights within the City, energy and materials for City-owned streetlights, and maintenance of City-owned streetlights.

The following street light condition has been placed on the project:

41. The applicant shall install street lights. Street lights along the major streets shall be installed on metal poles to local utility provider’s standards at the locations designated by the City Engineer.

Street light locations shall be shown on the utility plans submitted with the final map for approval.

Street lights at future traffic signal locations shall be installed on approved traffic signal poles, including all conduits and pull boxes. Street lights along the major streets shall be owned and maintained by local utility providers. Proof of local utility provider’s approval shall be provided. The applicant may install thematic lighting, as approved by the City Engineer. If the applicant chooses to install thematic lighting, the applicant shall provide a conceptual lighting plan identifying adjacent properties that may be incorporated with thematic lights to create a neighborhood effect. Thematic 1879
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization December 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
lighting owned by the City shall be maintained by an additional landscape maintenance assessment.

13. Schools
The City of Clovis and its sphere of influence lies primarily within the Clovis Unified School District (CUSD).

The portion the sphere of influence within the Loma Vista Specific Plan, east of the Highland Avenue alignment lies within the Sanger Unified School District (SUSD). Only a small portion of the southwest area of the city lies in the Fresno Unified School District (FUSD). These districts are affected by residential growth in the Clovis area. The area of the City serviced by FUSD is fully built-out and future development within the City’s sphere of influence will not affect this district.

14. Other Services
Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) provides gas and electrical service to the City of Clovis, its sphere of influence, and Fresno County. Electrical service is supplied by underground and overhead lines routed through three substations in the greater Clovis area. The hierarchy of establishing electrical power lines from generation stations to customers is as follows: transmission distribution; sub-transmission; and service. PG&E provides gas to customers through plastic and steel underground lines. Residents not serviced by PG&E use propane fuel.

15. Financing of Services and Facilities
The City Council has established fiscal policies that govern the city’s financial administration and are designed to safeguard the City’s assets, provide a stable funding base, and ensure that adequate accounting data are compiled. These accounting data allow for the preparation of various accounting reports such as the annual budget and the annual year-end financial report. Following are the financial policies that provide the basis for the financial direction of the city.  The City’s budget policy states that all operating budgets shall be balanced and ongoing costs will not exceed current revenues plus available fund balance that exceeds reserve requirements. The minimum reserve for any operational fund is 10% of the budgeted expenditures with the goal for reserves of 15% of budgeted expenditures unless capital borrowing or extraordinary fiscal conditions require that higher levels of reserves be maintained. As discussed during the five-year forecast, the General Fund target reserve is now set at 25%, the current General Fund reserve is approximately 16.5%. Budgetary and purchasing controls have been instituted that ensure adherence to the adopted budget.
 The Enterprise Funds are to be fully supported by user fees and charges, and the Internal Services Funds are to be funded at appropriate levels to ensure reasonable ability to respond to unforeseen events. Annually, the City has designated a contribution of general funds to the General Government Services Fund (an Internal Service Fund) to address the building space needs for new fire stations, safety training facilities, regional park facilities, business and industrial parks, upgrades and new technology for improved productivity, and major remodeling, repairs, or additions to existing facilities.
 The City will not issue long-term debt to cover current operations. The City will consider the issuance of long-term debt to purchase/build capital assets when those assets will benefit users over several years and it is determined that it is more equitable to spread the capital investment and financing costs of the asset to current and future users of the asset.  Annually the City will have an independent audit of its financial records prepared by a certified public accountant pursuant to generally accepted auditing practices of the government finance industry and submit an annual financial report to the City Council by December 31 for the previous fiscal year.
1880
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

SITE SPECIFIC SERVICE PLAN
City of Clovis Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization December 2024 Site Specific Service Plan
 Fees for services will be charged directly to users of the services when appropriate and should cover the full cost of service delivery. Fees are to be reviewed on an annual basis to ensure that the fee is appropriate for the service provided compared to actual cost or an approved cost index.  Development impact fees will be established to ensure that new growth pays the cost of infrastructure improvements and is not a burden to existing tax payers.  The City will invest available cash assets in a manner consistent with the safeguards and diversity that a prudent investor would adhere to with primary emphasis on preservation of principal, sufficient liquidity to cover anticipated payment outflows, and high yields consistent with the first two goals. The City’s investments will be consistent with Section 53601 of the Government Code of the State of California that identifies which types of investments are eligible for investment of public funds and the maximum percentage of an investment portfolio that is allowed for any one investment.

The City is in compliance with all of its financial policies.

16. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance The City of Clovis has completed an environmental review (an assessment of the Project’s impact on natural and manmade environments) of the proposed project, as required by the State of California. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved and adopted by the Clovis City Council in conjunction with its approval of the Project.
1881
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Services
DATE: December 16, 2024
SUBJECT: Consider various items associated with approximately 201 acres on the east side of N. Minnewawa Avenue, between East Behymer and Shepherd Avenues. Multiple, owners; Lennar Homes, applicant; Yamabe & Horn Engineering Inc., representative.
a. Consider Approval - Res. 24-__, A resolution of the City Council adopting an environmental finding of a mitigated negative declaration and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program for Reorganization 310, Prezone 2024-005, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6375, and Planned Development Permit 2024-001.
b. Consider Introduction - Ord. 24-__, R2024-005, An ordinance of the City Council approving a request to prezone property within the annexation area from the Fresno County AE20 Zone District to the Clovis C-1, R-1-PRD, O, and P-C-C Zone Districts.
c. Consider Approval - Res. 24-__, TM6375, A resolution of the City Council approving a vesting tentative tract map for a 385-lot single-family planned residential development on approximately 58.9 acres of land. d. Consider Approval - Res. 24-__, PDP2024-001, A resolution of the City Council approving a planned development permit for a 385-lot single-family residential development.
e. Consider Approval - Res. 24-___, RO310, A resolution of the City Council approving application for the annexation of the territory known as the Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization area (approximately 201 acres).

Staff: Liz Salazar, Assistant Planner
Recommendation: Approve
1882
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution CEQA

2. Draft Ordinance R2024-005

3. Draft Resolution TM6375

4. Draft Resolution PDP2024-001

5. Draft Resolution RO310

6. Proposed Development Standards for PDP2024-001

7. Landscape Plan with PDP2024-001 Park Amenity

8. Elevations and Floor Plans

9. Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMRP

10. Correspondence from Commenting Agencies

11. Site Specific Service Plan

RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council take action to approve each component of the proposed Project as outlined in the subject title of this item.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Lennar Homes (“Applicant”) is requesting approval for a series of entitlement applications including a prezone (“R2024-005”), a vesting tentative tract map (“TM6375”), planned development permit (“PDP2024-001”), and an annexation (“RO310”), hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Project”. This Project is designed as a 385-lot planned single-family development within the City’s Heritage Grove planned growth area. The Project site is a portion of the larger ±201-acre annexation area. Approval of this Project would enable City staff to proceed with the annexation process through Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) and would enable the Applicant to proceed with the processing of a residential site plan review (“RSPR”) entitlement and development drawings.

BACKGROUND
 General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential (4.1 – 7.0 DU/Ac)  Master Plan Designation: Heritage Grove Master Plan
 Existing Zoning: Fresno County AE20 Zone District
 Parcel Size: ±58.9 acres (annexation area ±201 acres)  Current Land Use: Agriculture and vacant
 Adjacent Land Uses:
o North: Rural Residential & Agricultural
o South: Rural Residential & Single-Family Residential
o East: Single-Family Residential
o West: Agricultural
The Project site is located within the City’s Heritage Grove Urban Center that encompasses four square miles within the northwest sphere of influence area of Clovis. Heritage Grove is one of three Urban Centers identified in the City’s General Plan and designed as sub-communities that enable the City to grow while maintaining authentic, small town character and overall livability.

A goal within the Heritage Grove Urban Center is to achieve compact development patterns that integrate a variety of housing types, sizes, and densities at the neighborhood and community level, and development of a well-connected grid system of roads. 1883
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS
The Project proposes a 385-lot, non-gated planned single-family development on a ±54.60-acre portion of the total ±58.9-acre site. The remainder of the site is planned for a future park and is not included as part of the development. The Project site is designated for Medium Density (4.1 – 7.0 DU/Ac) in the Clovis General Plan and the Project conforms with the existing designation by proposing at the maximum density of 7 dwelling units per acre. The Project would include construction of public and private streets, sidewalks, landscaped areas, and three (3) pocket parks with related amenities. The Project will also include a Homeowner’s Association (“HOA”).

Approximately 40 of the overall ±58.9-acre Project site will be included in the proposed ±201- acre annexation boundary. The remaining ±18.9 acres were included in a recent annexation (RO305) approved by the City Council. As depicted in Figure 1 below, the Project site and proposed annexation area are located on the south side of E. Behymer Avenue, east of N.

Minnewawa Avenue, generally west of the Enterprise Canal, and north of Shepherd Avenue.

Figure 1 – Project Area
= Annexation Boundary
= Project Site TM6375
N
1884
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Prezone and Planned Development Permit
Prezone
The Project also requires a prezone and planned development permit (PDP). The proposed prezone, R2024-005, will designate a City zone district of R-1-PRD (Single-Family Planned Residential Development) to the Project site. Additionally, the application will encompass the prezoning of several other sites slated for annexation from Fresno County Zoning to City of Clovis Zoning. This prezoning process is a prerequisite for the integration of the sites into the City. Figure 2 below illustrates the proposed zoning for each property, all of which will align with their perspective underlying General Plan designations.

Figure 2 – Zone Districts
1885
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Prezone Required Findings and Analysis
The subsequent findings are necessary to approve an application for prezone.

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan;
The proposed prezone (R2024-005) conforms to the existing General Plan designations for sites within the annexation area, extending beyond the 58.9 acre Project site. The prezoning aligns internally with the outlined goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan. a. Land Use Element - Goal 3: Orderly and sustainable outward growth into three Urban Centers with neighborhoods that provide a balanced mix of land uses and development types to support a community lifestyle and small town character.

The Project is proposed within the Heritage Grove Urban Center, one of the three Urban Centers designated by the General Plan to facilitate growth in a manner that prioritizes high quality, fiscal sustainability and balance. Approval of the Project would contribute to fulfilling the design guidelines of the urban center, encompassing circulation patterns, public facilities, and aesthetic considerations. b. Land Use Element - Goal 3, Policy 3.9: Connected development. New development in Urban Centers must fully improve roadway, pedestrian, and bicycle systems within and adjacent to the proposed project and connect to existing urbanized development.

Circulation Element - Goal 1: A comprehensive and well-maintained multimodal circulation system that provides for safe and efficient movement of people and goods.

The Project has been designed to fulfill both the circulation requirements outlined in the General Plan and the design guidelines specific to Heritage Grove. The development will enhance the adjacent streetscape along N. Minnewawa and develop Clovis Avenue along the Project’s frontage, as well as internal local streets within the Project site. Development of Clovis Avenue will provide connection to the existing City developments situated immediately to the south and east of the Project site, thereby contributing to the overall street grid system in the area.
c. Land Use Element - Goal 3, Policy 5.1: Housing variety in developments.

Housing variety in developments. The Clovis General Plan has been planned to provide a variety of housing product types suitable to each state of a person’s life. Each development should contribute to a diversity of housing sizes and types within the standards appropriate to the land use designation.

Land Use Element - Goal 5: A city with housing, employment, and lifestyle opportunities for all ages and incomes of residents.
1886
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

The Project proposes a mixture of housing products with lot sizes ranging from 2,112 to 17,353 square feet, including compact single-family residential homes. Typically, with the incorporation of smaller-than-standard lot sizes and the creation of smaller homes, the cost of a home is reduced. Therefore, potentially creating opportunities for home ownership for families and individuals with moderate incomes.

Furthermore, the Project will contribute towards the City’s housing inventory. Offering a nontraditional single-family development, it adds to the diversity of housing options in Clovis. The development presents three distinct product types, which includes Lennar’s Wilde, Treasures and Core style homes. The Wilde product features 2-story smaller lot sizes, while the Treasures and Core products offer larger lots with homes ranging from single-story to 2 stories. With these three product types complementing the already unique single-family residential development, the Project will enhance the variety of housing options available within the City's existing housing stock.

2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City;
The Project is located within the City's designated growth area and has undergone comprehensive evaluation by multiple City departments and external agencies for feedback.

Importantly, no significant concerns were raised by these stakeholders. Additionally, the Project's environmental impacts have been assessed through the accompanying Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (“ISMND”). The ISMND concluded that the environmental impacts were determined to be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures.

3. The parcel is physically suitable (including absence of physical constraints, access, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and provision of utilities) for the requested zoning designations and anticipated land uses/ projects.

The Project site is well suited to accommodate the proposed 385-lot single-family residential subdivision and necessary utility connections to the site. Situated directly west of the current city limits, the Project shares proximity with similar single-family residential developments to the south and east. The Project site is situated adjacent to single-family homes in various densities to the south and east. Westward, across N. Minnewawa Avenue, agricultural lands border the Project site. The Project's location is consistent with both existing and planned surrounding land uses.

Planned Development Permit
The proposed R-1-PRD designation for the Project site is consistent with the existing Medium Density Residential general plan designation. The R-1-PRD Zone District is appropriate for single-family small lot uses, including attached and detached single-family structures on small lots. PDPs are required for all planned residential developments, including the proposed Project (Clovis Municipal Code [“CMC”] § 9.10.010, subd. (B)(6).). PDPs facilitate design flexibility and encourage innovative and superior site planning, culminating in a comprehensive development of high quality. Further details regarding the PDP are outlined below. 1887
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Development Standards
The PDP provides the flexibility to adjust or modify development standards, such as building coverage, height, setbacks, fence and wall heights, landscaping, open space, and street layout, where necessary and justifiable. The Applicant is requesting approval of a non-gated detached single-family PDP with reduced parcel size, reduced setbacks and increased lot coverage. The table below outlines the proposed development standards for the Project. There are three housing product types that are distinguishable by their elevation and floor plans. While the Applicant has provided models for each of their products, the home models will be assessed against the established development standards and formalized through the RSPR process, which has been included as a condition of approval for the tract map and PDP. The proposed development standards for TM6375 are outlined below in Table 1.

Table 1 above delineates alterations to the customary development criteria. For comparison, the last column of the table provides standards for the typical zone district consistent with Medium Density, specifically the R-1-MD Zone District. The requested deviations specifically include a reduction in lot size, parcel width and depth, setbacks, height, non-standard garages, and an increase in parcel coverage. Staff has reviewed the proposed development standards mentioned above for the proposed single-family residential development and found them to be compatible with similar projects recently approved through the PDP process. The Wilde portion of the Project proposes a zero-lot line on the garage side with a minimum of a seven (7) foot setback on the opposite from the garage. The side with a seven (7) foot minimum setback will include a fenced uncovered patio area that will also accommodate toter storage. A condition of approval is recommended requiring a paved path leading from the street to a gate for each uncovered patio area. For parcels identified with a zero (0) foot interior setback, staff recommends a condition of Table 1 - PDP Development Standards
Standard
Housing Products Typical City Standards
R-1-MD (Medium
Density)
Wilde
(188 units)
Treasures
(90 units)
Core
(107 units)
Minimum Lot Size (Square Feet) 2,112 4,230 4,230 4,500
Minimum Parcel Width 39’ 45’ 45’ 50’
Minimum Corner Parcel Width N/A 50’ 50’ 50’
Minimum Reverse Parcel Width N/A 55’ 55’ 50’
Minimum Parcel Depth 53’ 94’ 94’ 90’
Maximum Lot Coverage 62% 52% 45% 45%
Maximum Height 26’ 7” 18’ 11” 25’ 3” 35’
Front (Garage side) Setback 4’ 20’ 20’ 20’
Front (Living side) Setback 10’ 12’ 12’ 15’
Interior Side Setback 0’ non-patio side
7’ patio side 5’ 5’ 5’
Street Side Setbacks 3’ 10’ 10’ 10’
Rear Setback 10’ 10’ 20’ 15’
Garages
20’x20’ interior
dimension (2-car)
20’x20’
interior
dimension
(2-car)
20’x20’
interior
dimension
(2-car)
20’X22’ interior dimension
(2-car)
1888
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
approval requiring acceptable covenant and deed restrictions allowing access to the abutting properties for repair and maintenance purposes.

Residential Site Plan Review
The Applicant will be required to submit an RSPR in order to allow staff to review lot-specific development standards. Specific color and materials of the models, walls, amenities, landscaping, and fencing will be evaluated through the civil plans.

Parking
Per planned residential development standards, the minimum parking requirement is two (2) covered spaces, plus one (1) covered or uncovered guest space for each dwelling unit.

Therefore, the Project will provide a minimum of 770 covered spaces and 385 guest spaces.

The Applicant is proposing a two-car garage for each unit. The Treasures and Core products include driveways, which count towards the guest parking. The Wilde products propose 258 uncovered street parking, thus meeting the minimum parking requirements for the overall development. Each two-car garage shall provide a minimum size of twenty (20) feet by twenty (20) feet interior dimension, which will be reviewed with the residential site plan review.

Homeowners Association
Although the Project is non-gated, an HOA is required for the purpose of maintaining open spaces and common areas, which will ensure they remain well-kept and functional, as well as enforcing the covenants, conditions and restrictions. This requirement is designed to uphold community standards and elevate the quality of life for residents within the Project's jurisdiction.

Proposed Amenities
Chapter 9.66 of the Clovis Municipal Code (Planned Development Permits) provides for flexibility in development standards to accommodate various development types that may not conform to standard regulations. Within this context, planned residential developments are mandated to provide a program of amenities proportional to the deviations being requested. Amenities may include, but are not limited to, features such as open space and improvements to the existing public facilities, such as parks and trails. It’s important to note that PDP amenities are assessed on a project-by-project basis, as each development is unique in terms of its scale, location and context.

In exchange for the requested development standard deviations described in Table 1 of the report, the Applicant is proposing a combination of an on-site amenity that is targeted towards homeowners and an off-site amenity that will provide a general public benefit. The Project proposes three pocket parks, totaling approximately 56,425 square feet. Each pocket park will be equipped with a BBQ station, picnic tables, seat walls, and grass area. The two (2) southern parks will include a shade structure, while the northern park includes a children’s swing set. A conceptual illustration of the proposed parks is shown in Figure 3 below.

When assessing and determining an adequate amenity that would provide a general public benefit, staff evaluated opportunities for open space and other public improvements within and near the proposed tract map. Staff identified construction of the planned trail along N. Sunnyside 1889
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Avenue, adjacent to the existing PG&E substation. This portion of the trail will have a 50-footwide easement, including a 20-foot parkway, 12-foot walk and an 18-foot landscape buffer as shown in Figure 4 below. However, due to the overall cost and need to obtain the right-of-way, this option proved not to be proportionate to the Project.

In the absence of a physical improvement to serve as an amenity, the Applicant has agreed to contribute a dollar amount totaling approximately $95,450, based on a calculation methodology recently utilized in conjunction with other projects. This monetary amount will be reserved for utilization towards the portion of the trail along N. Sunnyside Avenue, adjacent to the PG&E substation. Ultimately, if development of this portion of the trail is infeasible, the funds could be used for alternative public benefit improvement outside of the Project vicinity, such as development of shade structures and seating areas within the following neighborhood parks:

Woods Park (TM5146), Pinnacles Park (TM5002) or Countryside Park (TM4732/5545).

It is important to highlight that, in addition to the requirement for proportional amenities, approval of a PDP necessitates the demonstration of superior development quality compared to what could be achieved through conventional development practices on the site. This might entail enhancements, such as upgraded entry points, embellished block walls along street frontages and superior exterior elevation design. These features are typically integrated into the proposed planned development projects by the Applicant, subject to review and approval during the civil plan review process and residential site plan evaluation for individual lots.

Figure 3 – Proposed Open Space
Figure 4 – Sunnyside PG&E Trail Easement
1890
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Planned Development Permits Required Findings and Analysis The required findings for the approval of a PDP application, and staff’s response to each of those findings are listed below. (CMC § 9.66.060.)

1. The PDP would:
a. Be allowed within the subject base zoning district.

The proposed PDP2024-001 is permissible within the R-1-PRD Zone District, which is proposed concurrently with the pre-zoning of the Project site. b. Be consistent with the purpose, intent, goals, policies, actions, and land use designations of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

The Project proposes a single-family residential use, which is consistent with the established land use of the General Plan. Refer to number 1 of the Prezone Findings and Analysis section.
c. Be generally in compliance with all of the applicable provisions of this Development Code relating to both on- and off-site improvements that are necessary to accommodate flexibility in site planning and property development and to carry out the purpose, intent, and requirements of this chapter and the subject base zoning district, including prescribed development standards and applicable design guidelines.

Although the Project requests deviations from development standards, the requested PDP is compliant with the prescribed development standards attached hereto as Attachment 4. 1891
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

The Project proposes to construct both on-site and off-site improvements as required and directed by the City Engineer to ensure compliance with the City’s Development Code. d. Ensure compatibility of property uses within the zoning district and general neighborhood of the proposed development.

The Project shares a comparable density and development type with the existing surrounding developments, thus ensuring compatibility within the area.

2. The proposed Project would produce a comprehensive development of superior quality (e.g., appropriate variety of structure placement and orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high-quality architectural design, increased amounts of landscaping and open space, improved solutions to the design and placement of parking facilities, incorporation of a program of enhanced amenities, etc.) than which might otherwise occur from more traditional development applications.

The Project will provide an amenity program associated with the PDP as described in the Proposed Amenities section of this report. The architectural design of the homes will undergo thorough evaluation during the RSPR process to ensure high quality. Furthermore, enhanced landscaping will be required throughout the Project as part of the Project's aesthetic improvements.

3. Proper standards and conditions have been imposed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.

PDP2024-001 will comply the Development Code, with Fire Department standards and Building Code regulations to ensure adherence to public health and safety requirements.

4. Proper on-site traffic circulation and control is designed into the development to ensure protection for fire suppression and police surveillance equal to or better than what would normally be created by compliance with the minimum setback and parcel width standards identified in Division 2 of this title (Zoning Districts, Allowable Land Uses, and Zone-Specific Standards).

PDP2024-001 will adhere to the standards set by the Fire Department and the requirements of the City Engineer concerning fire suppression measures and enhancements to traffic flow related to TM6375, respectively.

5. The subject parcel is adequate in terms of size, shape, topography, and circumstances to accommodate the proposed development.

The proposed TM6375 associated with the requested PDP proposes to develop 385 units with the average lot size of 3,698 square feet. Therefore, the site is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed Project.
1892
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

6. The design, location, operating characteristics, and size of the proposed development would be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity, in terms of aesthetic values, character, scale, and view protection.

As indicated above, the PDP2024-001 is compatible with the existing and planned adjacent land uses. In regard to view protection, the PDP proposes a reduced maximum height limit than that prescribed under the comparable R-1-MD Zone District. The proposed development will process a RSPR application where aesthetics and design will be evaluated in compliance with the Development Code.

Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6375
As shown in Attachment 3A, the Applicant is requesting approval of TM6375 for 385 lots with various outlots for the purposes of private streets and open space. The proposed TM6375 features a range of lot sizes from 2,112 square feet to 17,353 square feet, with an average size of about 3,698 square feet. This tract map is organized into three (3) non-gated communities (See Table 1). The northwestern portion will feature the developer's Core product line, the northeastern portion will feature the Treasure’s product line, while the southern neighborhood will showcase the more compact Wilde product line. The Core product line includes 107 units and the Treasures product line includes 90 units with sizes varying from 4,230 to 17,353 square feet. The Wilde product line (varying from 2,112 to 2,778 square feet) proposes 188 units featuring smaller lots and more compact housing options compared to the Core and Treasures lines. Further specifics regarding the vesting tentative tract map are detailed below.

Circulation
The Project proposes four (4) points of access, two (2) along N. Minnewawa Avenue, one (1) along Clovis Avenue, and one (1) along DeWitt Avenue. North Minnewawa and Clovis Avenues will comply with the City's standards for arterial roads, including compliance with the Heritage Grove Design Guidelines. The Project includes both public and private streets. Several private streets are designed to lead to the garages of the Wilde product homes. The Project includes sidewalks along all public streets. The private internal streets will not have traditional street lined sidewalks. However, the development will provide internal pedestrian pathways within each residential block.

Sewer and Water Impact
The Project’s impacts to water and sewer facilities were analyzed during the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review. Provost and Pritchard, the City’s water system consultant, provided a summary of water system impacts and concluded that the City has capacity to serve, and that infrastructure can accommodate the Project upon completion of the recommended connections. The City Engineer completed a sewer analysis and concluded that the City has capacity to accommodate the Project. The Project lies within the Fresno Irrigation District (FID) boundary and therefore, is eligible to utilize entitled surface water from the Kings River.

Heritage Grove Thematic Elements
The City’s 2014 General Plan directed the preparation and adoption of a comprehensive design document for the Heritage Grove area. As a result, the Heritage Grove Design Guidelines was 1893
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
developed and adopted on December 5, 2016. The document is intended to accommodate growth in a manner that is of high quality, fiscally sustainable and balanced. The design document establishes an overall agricultural theme and quality for Heritage Grove. It illustrates and directs the intended architectural, landscape and site elements to reinforce the theme and quality. The proposed Project is required to adhere to design standards outlined in the Heritage Grove Design Guidelines.

The Project will develop N. Minnewawa Avenue as a thematic street and Clovis Avenue as a community boulevard as designated by the Heritage Grove Design Guidelines. The N.

Minnewawa Avenue design requires an eighteen (18) foot parkway and the N. Clovis Avenue design requires a twenty (20) foot parkway, between the right-of-way and private parcels. Staff will work with the developer to establish a design that meets the intent provided in the Heritage Grove Design Guidelines.

Vesting Tentative Tract Map Findings and Analysis
The following are findings required to approve a vesting tentative tract map (CMC §§ 9.102.060, subd. (A), and 9.102.110, subd. (C).). It is important to note that some of these findings overlap with those detailed in the previous “Planned Development Permits Required Findings and Analysis” and “Prezone Required Findings and Analysis” sections of this report and will reference the information provided therein.

1. The proposed map, subdivision design, and improvements are consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.

The proposed map (TM6375) design maintains consistency with both the General Plan and the proposed PDP. Refer to number 1 of the “Prezone Required Findings and Analysis” section. All improvements will adhere to the proposed conditions of approvals and City standards. The specifics of these improvements will undergo scrutiny during the City's civil plan review process to ensure compliance with standards.

2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development.

Refer to number 5 of the “Planned Development Permits Required Findings and Analysis” section.

3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

As described in the ISMND prepared for the Project (Attachment 9), environmental impacts were determined to be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures.

Consequently, the Project is not anticipated to inflict substantial environmental harm or endanger fish and wildlife.

4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems.
1894
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

The design of the Project will comply with the Development Code, Fire Department standards and Building Code regulations to ensure adherence to public health and safety requirements.

Furthermore, during review of the Project, agencies and City departments had the opportunity to review the Project to ensure consistency with City codes and regulations and no serious public health or safety concerns were identified. Therefore, the Project was determined not to be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, or general welfare of the City.

5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. This finding may also be made if the review authority finds that alternate easements for access or use will be provided, and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This finding shall apply only to easements of record, or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, and no authority is hereby granted to the review authority to determine that the public at large has acquired easements of access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

During the final map review process conducted by the City's Engineering Division, all easements will be identified. Additionally, during the final map review, the City Engineer and other outside agencies will ensure that no conflicts with easements would occur as a result of the Project. As needed, alternate easements will be found that will be substantially equivalent to those previously required in TM6375.

6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

The City Engineer has determined that the City has the capacity to accommodate the proposed Project. Installation of sewer lines within the proposed subdivision and beyond its borders will adhere to the regulations set forth by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

7. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities.

The proposed subdivision will comply with the Development Code and California Building Code requirements as it relates to heating and cooling opportunities within TM6375.

8. The proposed subdivision, its design, density, and type of development and improvements conform to the regulations of this Development Code and the regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law.

The proposed subdivision is proposing a density of 7 units per acre, aligning with the Clovis General Plan's Land Use designation of Medium Density Residential (4.1-7.0 DU/Ac).

Furthermore, the proposed subdivision comprises single-family housing, in accordance with the residential development requirements outlined in the Clovis General Plan. The proposed 1895
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
development will process an RSPR application, where aesthetics and design will be evaluated in compliance with the Development Code and established PDP development standards.

Annexation
The Project is situated within the City’s Heritage Grove planned growth area and requires annexation into the City. While the Project site encompasses approximately 58.9 acres, a larger annexation area is proposed after consultation with the County of Fresno and the LAFCo staff to establish a logical boundary for incorporation with regard to the overall annexation timing of this area. In addition to the ±58.9-acre site, the proposed annexation boundary includes properties planned for future residential development at similar densities, future community park, mixed use development, and neighborhood commercial. If approved by the City Council, the annexation application will proceed to the LAFCo for processing and final consideration.

Development of the Project cannot occur without the completion of the annexation process.

Annexation Details:

Property owners: 18
Owners Consenting to Annexation: 18
Registered Voters: 18
Acreage: ±201
Standard Conditions of Annexation:

The City established standard baseline conditions for annexation projects that are incorporated into the resolution for the proposed annexation (Attachment 5). These conditions encapsulate the mutually agreed upon tax-sharing arrangements between the City and Fresno County and scheduling of public services for the annexation sites. A site-specific service plan has been prepared demonstrating the City’s capacity to effectively serve the properties within the proposed annexation territory. The plan requires approval from the City Council and will be provided to Fresno LAFCo. The plan is provided as Attachment 11 of this report.

Consistency with General Plan Goals and Policies
Staff has evaluated the Project in light of the goals and policies of the General Plan. The following goals and policies reflect Clovis' desire to maintain Clovis’ tradition of responsible planning and well-managed growth to preserve the quality of life in existing neighborhoods and ensure the development of new neighborhoods with an equal quality of life. These goals and policies seek to foster more compact development patterns that can reduce the number, length, and duration of auto trips.

Goal 3: Orderly and sustainable outward growth into three Urban Centers with neighborhoods that provide a balanced mix of land uses and development types to support a community lifestyle and small-town character.

Policy 3.5 Fiscal sustainability. The City shall require establishment of community facility districts, lighting and landscaping maintenance districts, special districts, and other special funding or financing tools in conjunction with or as a condition of development, building or permit approval, or annexation or sphere of influence 1896
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
amendments when necessary to ensure that new development is fiscally neutral or beneficial.

Policy 3.6 Mix of housing types and sizes. Development is encouraged to provide a mix of housing types, unit sizes, and densities at the block level. To accomplish this, individual projects five acres or larger may be developed at densities equivalent to one designation higher or lower than the assigned designation, provided that the density across an individual project remains consistent with the General Plan.

Goal 5: A city with housing, employment, and lifestyle opportunities for all ages and incomes of residents.

Policy 5.1: Housing variety in developments. The Clovis General Plan has been planned to provide a variety of housing product types suitable to each stage of a person’s life.

Each development should contribute to a diversity of housing sizes and types within the standards appropriate to the land use designation. This policy does not apply to projects smaller than five acres.

Policy 5.2 Ownership and rental. Encourage a mixture of both ownership and rental options to meet varied preferences and income affordability needs.

Planning Commission Hearing – November 21, 2024
On Thursday November 21, 2024, the Planning Commission considered the Project with staff presenting the Project alongside its recommendations and detailed information as described in the staff report. One individual voiced support for the project, highlighting its contribution to housing and overall development in the area. No one voiced opposition to the project during the hearing. After discussions, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve the entitlements associated with the Project. All items were approved with a vote of 4- 0-1, with Chair Antuna absent.

Public Notice and Comments
The City published a notice of this public hearing in The Business Journal on Monday, December 2, 2024. A public hearing notice was sent to area residents within 600 feet of the property boundaries for the December 16, 2024, City Council hearing. As of the completion of this staff report, staff has not received any comments from the public.

Review and Comments from Agencies
The Project was distributed to all City divisions as well as outside agencies, including Caltrans, Clovis Unified School District, Fresno Irrigation District, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, AT&T, PG&E, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, State Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the County of Fresno.

Comments received are attached (Attachment 10) only if the agency has provided concerns, conditions, or mitigation measures. Routine responses and comment letters are placed in the administrative record and provided to the Applicant for their records. 1897
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Community Facilities District
The fiscal analysis of the Loma Vista Specific Plan identified possible long-term funding shortfalls in Clovis’ Citywide operating and maintenance costs. To address this issue the City of Clovis implemented a Community Facilities District. Community Facilities Districts (CFDs) are a means of providing additional funding for the provision of public facilities and services for public safety in newly developing areas of the community where the city would not otherwise be able to afford to continue to provide an adequate level of service as the City continues to grow. The use of CFDs is fairly common among cities in California experiencing high rates of growth, such as Clovis, due to significant losses of local revenue from tax shifts authorized by the State of California and the need to continue to provide an adequate level of service as growth occurs.

A condition of approval has been added to TM6375 requiring participation of this Project in the CFD.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The City of Clovis has completed an Initial Study (see Attachment 9) assessing the project’s impact on natural and manmade environments, as required by the State of California. Staff is recommending approval of a mitigated negative declaration (“MND”). An MND is a written statement announcing that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment with the implementation of mitigation measures. The complete ISMND can be found on the City’s website at: https://cityofclovis.com/planning-and-development/ceqa.

In summary, environmental impacts were determined to be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures for agricultural resources, biological resources, cultural resources, geological resources, noise, greenhouse gas emissions, and tribal cultural resources. (See the mitigation and monitoring program attached hereto as Attachment 9.) The Notice of Intent to adopt an MND was posted to the City’s website at the web address listed above. (Cal.

Code Regs., Tit. 14, § 15072, subd. (b)(2).) The proposed MND was made available for public comment and review at the City’s Planning and Development Services Department from October 18, 2024, to November 21, 2024. (Cal. Code Regs., Tit. 14, § 15073, subd. (a).)

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
The proposed Project will provide a diversity in housing types, contribute a quality residential product and further advance growth within the Heritage Grove growth area as envisioned by the General Plan. The Project does not substantially impact sewer, water and other public services and will contribute to their proportionate share of infrastructure and open space. The Project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and Development Code and each component of the Project meets the findings that must be considered when making a decision on a project, as outlined in sections above. Staff therefore recommend that the City Council approve resolutions to adopt an MND and mitigation monitoring program in accordance with CEQA, and approve RO310, R2024-005, TM6375, and PDP2024-004, subject to the conditions of approval provided in Attachments 3B and 4A.
1898
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The annexation application will be prepared and submitted to LAFCo after all materials have been submitted by the applicant, sufficient to meet the conditions for the application.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.

Prepared by: Liz Salazar, Assistant Planner
Reviewed by: City Manager JH
1899
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION 24-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS ADOPTING A MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR REORGANIZATION 310, PREZONE 2024-005, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6375, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2024-001, PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES
WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, LLC (“Applicant”), 8080 N. Palm Avenue Suite 110, Fresno, CA 93711, has submitted various entitlement applications including Reorganization 310 (“RO310”), Prezone 2024-005 (“R2024-005”), Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6375 (“TM6375”) and Planned Development Permit (“PDP”) 2024-001 (“PDP2024-001”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Project”) for property located south of East Behymer Avenue, between North Minnewawa Avenue and the Enterprise Canal and north of East Shepherd Avenue within the Heritage Grove Urban Center (“Property”); and
WHEREAS, the City of Clovis caused to be prepared an initial study (hereinafter incorporated by reference) to evaluate potential environmental impacts from the Project, and on the basis of that study, it was determined that no significant environmental impacts would result from this Project with the adoption of mitigation measures; and
WHEREAS, the City adopted a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the 2014 General Plan Circulation Element Update on October 17, 2022. The SEIR evaluated potential land uses consistent with the General Plan and their associated VMT impacts. The SEIR finds that implementation of the 2014 General Plan may result in VMT metrics that are greater than the applicable thresholds. Mitigation measures include policies to reduce VMT. Because the City cannot demonstrate that the implementation of these policies would achieve VMT reductions to meet the VMT thresholds, the impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. Therefore, following approval of the SEIR, individual land use development projects that are consistent with the 2014 General Plan have the opportunity to tier their environmental review from the General Plan SEIR. The SEIR has disclosed the VMT impacts of land use development consistent with the General Plan. Therefore, significant and unavoidable VMT impacts associated with the General Plan have already been disclosed. Because the proposed Project is consistent with the 2014 General Plan, the Project’s significant transportation impacts do not require a project specific EIR. Overall, the Project, is determined to be consistent with the 2014 General Plan, and would result in a significant and unavoidable impact.

WHEREAS, on the basis of this initial study, a proposed mitigated negative declaration (“MND”) has been prepared, circulated, and made available for public comment pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000, et seq.), and Guidelines for implementation of CEQA (Cal. Code Regs., Tit. 14, §§ 15000, et seq.); and WHEREAS, the notice of intent to adopt an MND was posted to City’s website in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15072, subdivision (b)(2), and notice of the public hearing for this item was published with the Fresno Business Journal on November 29, 2024; and 1900
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

WHEREAS, the City Council has independently reviewed, evaluated, and considered the CEQA analysis outlined in the staff report, initial study, MND and all comments, written and oral, received from persons who reviewed the MND, or otherwise commented on the Project (“Administrative Record”).

NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ENTIRE RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AND FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing recitals as true and correct.

2. The initial study and MND for the Project are adequate, reflect the City’s independent judgment and analysis, and have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.

3. That the initial study and MND were presented to the City Council and the City Council has independently reviewed, evaluated, and considered the entire Administrative Record including the initial study, MND and all comments, written and oral, received from persons who reviewed the initial study and MND, or otherwise commented on the Project prior to approving the Project.

4. On the basis of the entire Administrative Record, that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment with the adoption of the mitigation measures identified in Attachment A.

5. The MND and the mitigation monitoring program set forth in Attachment A, including the mitigation measures identified therein and as described in the MND itself are hereby adopted.

6. Directs that the record of these proceedings shall be contained in the Department of Planning and Development Services located at 1033 Fifth Street, Clovis, California 93612, and the custodian of the record shall be the City Planner or other person designated by the Planning and Development Services Director.

7. The Planning and Development Services Director, or his/her designee, is authorized to file a notice of determination for the Project in accordance with CEQA and to pay any fees required for such filing.

8. The basis for the findings is detailed in the December 16, 2024, staff report, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, the entire Administrative Record, as well as evidence and comments presented in connection with the MND. * * * * *
1901
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on December 16, 2024, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:

Mayor City Clerk
1902
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

ATTACHMENT A:

Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
RO310, R2024-005, TM6375, and PDP2024-001
Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
Agriculture and Forestry Resources
AGR-1 The Project applicant shall prepare or fund an
agricultural resource evaluation prior to project
approval. The resource evaluation shall be use
generally accepted methodologies (such as
the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model) to identify the potentially significant
impact of the loss of agricultural land. If the loss
of agricultural land is determined to be a
potentially significant impact, the resource
evaluation shall consider the economic viability
of future agricultural use of the property. If the
agricultural resource is considered significant
and future agricultural use is considered
economically viable, the conversion will be
deemed significant. The City shall require
mitigation by one of the following methods:
• Mitigation at a 1:1 ration of converted to
preserved acreage through a regional
conservation easement, or payment of
its valuation equivalent if a fee
mitigation program is established. If 1:1
mitigation is determined to be
economically infeasible, based upon all
of the evidence, the ratio may be
reduced to an economically feasible
ratio or no further mitigation shall be
required. This determination shall be
City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
1903
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
made by the City’s Director of Planning
and Development Services based upon
substantial evidence in the record; or
• Other potential mitigation which
achieves the same mitigating effect as
the measures identified above,
consistent with the CEQA Statutes and
Guidelines. This determination shall be
made by the City’s Director of Planning
and Development Services based upon
substantial evidence in the record.

ARG-2 Prior to issuance of building permits for
development of APN 556-030-17S, the project
applicant would be required to petition for
cancellation of the Williamson Act contract for
APN 556-030-17S. The applicant would have
to meet circumstances and conditions set forth
in Government Code Section 51280. After
approval of the cancellation petition, the
applicant would be able to develop uses that
comply with the zoning designation of the
parcel per the Clovis Municipal Code.

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
ARG-3 Pursuant to Clovis Municipal Code Section

9.40.170 and the California Civil Code Section
3482.5, prior to approval of building occupancy
permits the Project developer shall provide
residents of the Project site Right-To-Farm
notifications. The Right-To-Farm notification
would advise future occupants of the Project
site that they are residing adjacent to
City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
1904
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
agricultural land that has been active for three
or more years and that they should expect
continued activities associated with agricultural
production.

Biological Resources
BIO-1 Sanford’s arrowhead. Prior to the start of
construction, a qualified biologist will conduct
protocol-level rare plant surveys following
California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s
2018 Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating
Impacts to Special Status Native Plant
Populations and Sensitive Natural
Communities, or most current agency
guidance. Surveys will target all habitats of the
Project site that could potentially support the
Sanford’s arrowhead, and will be conducted
when local populations of the Sanford’s
arrowhead are in bloom and readily
identifiable.

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
BIO-2 Sanford’s arrowhead. If Sanford’s arrowhead
populations are identified on site, project
design will be modified, if at all feasible, to
avoid the plants. A qualified biologist will
identify an appropriate buffer around the
plants, and no developments or other projectrelated activities will be permitted within.

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
BIO-3 Sanford’s arrowhead. If it is not feasible to
avoid Sanford’s arrowhead populations, the
affected populations will be salvaged in
accordance with a plan prepared by a qualified
biologist that will include contingencies for an
City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
1905
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
unsuccessful salvage effort. Salvage methods
may include seed collection and dispersal,
transplanting rootstock, and/or topsoil
collection and redispersal, as appropriate. The
relocation area(s) will be located in alternative
on-site emergent wetland habitat to be
established and maintained for this species,
and protected through a deed restriction,
conservation easement, or similar mechanism.

Relocation areas will be monitored by a
qualified biologist for a period of five years to
ensure successful establishment.

BIO-4 Monarch butterfly. Prior to the start of
construction, a qualified biologist will survey all
proposed work areas for milkweed plants. The
survey will be conducted at a time of year when
milkweed is readily identifiable. The objective
of the survey will be to tally and map all
milkweed plants that could potentially be
impacted by project activities (Milkweed
Survey).

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
BIO-5 Monarch butterfly. If feasible, any removal of
milkweed plants required for residential
buildout will take place entirely outside of the
period in which monarchs are most likely to
breed in the project vicinity, March 1-August 31
(Construction Timing).

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
BIO-6 Monarch butterfly. If removal of milkweed
plants cannot be avoided between March 1
and August 31, a qualified biologist will conduct
pre-construction surveys for non-volant life
stages of monarchs on those milkweed plants
City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
1906
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
that will be removed, within 10 days prior to the
start of construction. If any non-volant life
stages are identified, then those plants will be
avoided until it is confirmed by a qualified
biologist that a monarch is no longer present
(Preconstruction Surveys and Avoidance).

BIO-7 Monarch butterfly. Impacted milkweed plants
will be replaced on site in accordance with a
revegetation plan prepared by a qualified
biologist. A minimum of 50 replacement
plantings will be provided, or three times the
number of milkweed plants identified at the
time of the milkweed survey (see Mitigation
Measure BIO-4), whichever is greater.

Replacement plantings must be locally native;
preferred species are narrowleaf milkweed (A.
fascicularis) and showy milkweed (A.
speciosa). The planting site(s) must be in
area(s) that will not be mowed or treated with
pesticides or herbicides, to be guaranteed via
a deed restriction or similar protective
mechanism. Revegetation areas will be
monitored by a qualified biologist for a period
of five years to ensure successful
establishment. (Compensatory Mitigation).

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
BIO-8 Swainson’s hawk. If feasible, project activities
will take place entirely outside of the
Swainson’s hawk nesting season, defined here
as March 1 to September 15. If Mitigation
Measure BIO-8 is implemented, no further
mitigation for this species is required.
(Construction Timing).

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
1907
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
BIO-9 Swainson’s hawk. If project activities must
occur between March 1 and September 15, a
qualified biologist will conduct nest surveys for
Swainson’s hawks on and within ¼ mile of the
Project site within the survey periods
prescribed by Recommended Timing and
Methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting
Surveys in California’s Central Valley (SHTAC
2000). Three nest surveys will be conducted
in each of two survey periods, with the survey
periods defined as follows: Period I – January
1 to March 20, Period II – March 20 to April 5,
Period III – April 5 to April 20, Period IV – April
21 to June 10, and Period V – June 10 to July

30. Surveys will take place in the two survey
periods immediately prior to the anticipated
start of construction activities during the
nesting season, with the exception of Period III,
when no surveys should take place per the
SHTAC guidelines. The surveys will consist of
inspecting all accessible, suitable trees of the
survey area for the presence of nests and
hawks. (Nesting Surveys).

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
BIO-10 Swainson’s hawk. If active Swainson’s hawk
nests are detected during the surveys or
observed incidentally, a minimum ¼-mile nodisturbance buffer will be delineated and maintained around each nest, to remain in
place until the breeding season has ended or
until a qualified biologist has determined that
the birds have fledged and are no longer reliant
City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
1908
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
upon the nest or parental care for survival. (NoDisturbance Buffers).

BIO-11 Swainson’s hawk. If an active Swainson’s
hawk nest is detected, and a ¼-mile nodisturbance buffer is not feasible, the project applicant will consult with CDFW to discuss
how to implement the project and avoid take. If
take cannot be avoided, take authorization will
be obtained through the acquisition of a State
Incidental Take Permit (ITP), pursuant to Fish
and Game Code section 2081 subdivision (b).
(CDFW Consultation).

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
BIO-12 Other nesting birds and raptors. If feasible,
project activities will take place entirely outside
of the avian nesting season, defined here as
February 1 to September 15. If Mitigation
Measure BIO-12 is implemented, no further
mitigation for nesting birds or raptors is
required. (Construction Timing).

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
BIO-13 Other nesting birds and raptors. If project
activities must occur between February 1 and
September 15, a qualified biologist will conduct
surveys for active bird nests within 10 days
prior to the start of work during this period. The
survey area will encompass the site and
accessible surrounding lands within 250 feet
for nesting birds and 500 feet for nesting
raptors (Preconstruction Surveys).

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
BIO-14 Other nesting birds and raptors. Should any
active nests be discovered in or near the work
area, a qualified biologist will conduct an
City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
1909
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
additional survey to establish a behavioral
baseline of these nests. (Behavioral Baseline).

BIO-15 Other nesting birds and raptors. If feasible,
a qualified biologist will continuously monitor
active nests during project activities to detect
behavioral changes resulting from the project.

If behavioral changes occur, the activities that
appear to be causing the changes (as
determined by the qualified biologist) will be
discontinued. At the biologist’s discretion,
activities may be resumed (1) in a modified
form, with lower levels of visual or sound
disturbance, (2) following the implementation
of measures designed to reduce perceived
disturbance, e.g. visual buffers, and/or (3) at a
later nesting stage, when the affected birds are
less sensitive to disturbance. (Continuous
Monitoring).

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
BIO-16 Other nesting birds and raptors. If
continuous monitoring of active nests is not
feasible, or if nesting birds have behavioral
changes that persist following the
implementation of one or more of the corrective
actions identified above under Mitigation
Measure 4.1.4d, a minimum no-disturbance
buffer of 250 feet will be established around
active bird nests and 500 feet around active
raptor nests. These buffers will remain in place
until after the breeding season has ended or
until a qualified biologist has determined that
the birds have fledged and are no longer reliant
City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
1910
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
upon the nest or on-site parental care for
survival. Variance from these no-disturbance
buffers is possible when there is compelling
biological or ecological reason to do so. A
qualified biologist will advise and support any
variance from these buffers. (No-Disturbance
Buffers).

Cultural Resources
CULT-1
If archaeological or tribal resources or
materials are encountered during construction
activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of
the find shall halt until a qualified professional
archaeologist, can evaluate the significance of
the find and make recommendations. Cultural
resource materials may include prehistoric
resources such as flaked and ground stone
tools and debris, shell, bone, ceramics, and
fire-affected rock as well as historic resources
such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or structural
remnants.

If the qualified professional archaeologist
determines that the discovery represents a
potentially significant cultural resource,
additional investigations may be required to
mitigate adverse impacts from project
implementation. These additional studies may
include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or
data recovery excavation.

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
1911
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
If a potentially-eligible resource is
encountered, then the qualified professional
archaeologist, the Lead Agency, and the
project proponent shall arrange for either 1)
total avoidance of the resource or 2) test
excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if
eligible, total data recovery. The determination
shall be formally documented in writing and
submitted to the Lead Agency as verification
that the provisions for managing unanticipated
discoveries have been met.

CULT-2 If human remains are discovered during
construction or operational activities, further
excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited
pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California
Health and Safety Code and Project shall
follow the procedures and protocols set for un
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(e)(1). If
human remains are identified to be those of
Native American, California Health and Safety
Code 7050.5 requires the County coroner
notify the California Native American Heritage
Commission within 24 hours of discovery. All
reports, correspondence, and determinations
regarding the discovery of human remains on
the Project site shall be submitted to the Lead
Agency.

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
Geological Resources
1912
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
GEO-1
If prehistoric or historic-era cultural materials
are encountered during construction activities,
all work in the immediate vicinity of the find
shall halt until a qualified professional
archaeologist and/or paleontologist, can
evaluate the significance of the find and make
recommendations. Cultural resource materials
may include prehistoric resources such as
flaked and ground stone tools and debris, shell,
bone, ceramics, and fire-affected rock as well
as historic resources such as glass, metal,
wood, brick, or structural remnants.

If the qualified professional determines that the
discovery represents a potentially significant
cultural resource, additional investigations may
be required to mitigate adverse impacts from
project implementation. These additional
studies may include avoidance, testing, and
evaluation or data recovery excavation.

If a potentially-eligible resource is
encountered, then the qualified professional
archaeologist and/or paleontologist, the Lead
Agency, and the project proponent shall
arrange for either 1) total avoidance of the
resource or 2) test excavations to evaluate
eligibility and, if eligible, total data recovery.

The determination shall be formally
documented in writing and submitted to the
Lead Agency as verification that the provisions
City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
1913
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
for managing unanticipated discoveries have
been met.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
GHG-1 In order to meet the 2022 Scoping Plan GHG
requirements, consistent with State GHG
reduction and equity prioritization goals, each
residential unit shall provide electric vehicle
charging capabilities as part of the final
project designs.

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
Noise
NOISE-1 Exterior Noise. A sound wall shall be
constructed to a minimum height of six (6) feet
above Project-side grade along North
Minnewawa Avenue. In order for the sound
wall to effectively shield noise, where there will
be access to the development from North
Minnewawa Avenue, the sound walls will need
to be turned inward (eastward) for a distance
of approximately twenty (20) feet at roadway
access points. Other Project design features
that satisfy the City’s exterior noise exposure
noise level may fulfill this mitigation.

City of Clovis
Planning
During
Construction
and Prior to
Occupancy
NOISE-2 Interior Noise. Mechanical ventilation or air
conditioning shall be provided for all homes to
enable windows and doors to remain closed for
sound insulation purposes.

City of Clovis
Planning
During
Construction
and Prior to
Occupancy
Tribal Cultural Resources
1914
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
TCR-1
If archaeological or tribal resources or
materials are encountered during construction
activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of
the find shall halt until a qualified professional
archaeologist, can evaluate the significance of
the find and make recommendations. Cultural
resource materials may include prehistoric
resources such as flaked and ground stone
tools and debris, shell, bone, ceramics, and
fire-affected rock as well as historic resources
such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or structural
remnants.

If the qualified professional archaeologist
determines that the discovery represents a
potentially significant cultural resource,
additional investigations may be required to
mitigate adverse impacts from project
implementation. These additional studies may
include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or
data recovery excavation.

If a potentially-eligible resource is
encountered, then the qualified professional
archaeologist, the Lead Agency, and the
project proponent shall arrange for either 1)
total avoidance of the resource or 2) test
excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if
eligible, total data recovery. The determination
shall be formally documented in writing and
submitted to the Lead Agency as verification
City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
1915
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring Responsibility Timing Verification
(Date and
Initials)
that the provisions for managing unanticipated
discoveries have been met.

TCR-2 If human remains are discovered during
construction or operational activities, further
excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited
pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California
Health and Safety Code and Project shall
follow the procedures and protocols set for un
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(e)(1). If
human remains are identified to be those of
Native American, California Health and Safety
Code 7050.5 requires the County coroner
notify the NAHC within 24 hours of discovery.

All reports, correspondence, and
determinations regarding the discovery of
human remains on the project site shall be
submitted to the Lead Agency.

City of Clovis
Planning
Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
1916
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Attachment 2
ORDINANCE 24-___

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS AND

CHANGING THE OFFICIAL ZONE MAP OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.080.020 OF THE CLOVIS MUNICIPAL CODE TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 201 ACRES FROM THE FRESNO AE20 ZONE DISTRICT TO THE CLOVIS C-1, R-1-PRD, O, AND P-C-C ZONE DISTRICTS FOR PROPERTIES

LOCATED SOUTH OF EAST BEHYMER AVENUE, BETWEEN NORTH MINNEWAWA

AVENUE AND THE ENTERPRISE CANAL AND NORTH OF EAST SHEPHERD AVENUE
WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, LLC. 8080 N. Palm Avenue Suite 110, Fresno, CA 93711 (“Applicant”), has applied for a Prezone (“R2024-005”) (“Project”); and WHEREAS, the Applicant’s request is to prezone approximately 54.60 acres from the Fresno County AE20 Zone District to the Clovis R-1-PRD Zone District in conjunction with its proposal to annex the subject property and develop Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6375, which would subdivide the subject property into approximately 385 residential lots; and WHEREAS, after consultation with the County of Fresno and the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) regarding the Applicant’s proposal, the annexation boundary was expanded to encompass approximately 201 acres to create a logical boundary, creating the need to expand the prezoning application to include the full annexation boundary, including prezoning properties to the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial), R-1-PRD (Single-Family Planned Residential Development), O (Open Space), and P-C-C (Planned Commercial Center) Zone Districts; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on November 21, 2024, to consider the Project approval, at which time interested persons were given opportunity to comment on the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted and adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve R2024-005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission’s recommendations were forwarded to the City Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, the City published notice of the public hearing in The Business Journal on December 2, 2024 mailed public notices to property owners within 600 feet of the Property ten (10) days prior to the City Council hearing, and otherwise posted notice of the public hearing according to applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on December 16, 2024, to consider approval of R2024-005; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) analysis outlined in the staff report, which is incorporated by this reference herein, and elsewhere in the Administrative Record which determines that the Project meets the 1917
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
requirements pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and recommends that the City Council adopt the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring and reporting program; and WHEREAS, the City Council has had an opportunity to review and consider the entire Administrative Record relating to the Project, which is on file with the Department, and reviewed and considered those portions of the Administrative Record determined to be necessary to make an informed decision, including, but not necessarily limited to, the staff report and staff presentation, the written materials submitted with the request, and the verbal and written testimony and other evidence presented during the public hearing.

NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ENTIRE RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The proposed prezone is consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the adopted General Plan.

2. The proposed prezone would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City.

3. The Property is physically suitable (including absence of physical constraints, access, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and provision of utilities) for the requested zoning designation and development of the Project.

4. The City Council has adopted the Project’s mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring and reporting program.

5. The basis and evidence for the findings are detailed in the December 16, 2024, staff report, which is hereby incorporated by reference, the entire Administrative Record, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the public hearing.

The City Council of the City of Clovis does ordain as follows:

Section 1 The official map of the city is amended in accordance with Section 9.08.020 and Chapter 9.86 of the Clovis Municipal Code by rezoning certain land in the City of Clovis, County of Fresno, State of California, to wit:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

See the attached Attachment A.

From the Fresno County AE20 Zone District to the Clovis C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial), R1-PRD (Single-Family Planned Residential Development), O (Open Space), and P-C-C (Planned Commercial Center) Zone Districts;
Section 2 This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.
1918
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

APPROVED: December 16, 2024
______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk
* * * * * * * * * *
The foregoing Ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council held on December 16, 2024 and was adopted at a regular meeting of said Council held on January 6, 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED: January 6, 2025
___________________________________
City Clerk
1919
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Attachment A

AREA TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF CLOVIS GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION Being a portion of the West Half of Section 20 together with a portion of the East 30 feet of Section 19 and the South 40 feet of Section 17, Township 12 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base & Meridian, according to the Official United States Government Township Plat thereof, in the County of Fresno, State of California, described as follows:

BEGINNING at the Southeast Corner of said Section 19 and running along the South and West right-of-way line of Minnewawa Avenue according to the Grant Deed thereof recorded in Book 6706 at Page 288, Official Record Fresno County, the following 2 courses:

1. South 89°21'21” West, 30.00 feet along the South line of said Section 19 to the West right-of-way line of Minnewawa Avenue; thence

2. North 1°06'32” West, 5296.80 feet along the West right-of-way line of Minnewawa Avenue to the North line of said Section 19; thence Along the West, North, and East right-of-way lines of Behymer Avenue according to the map thereof recorded in Book 2 of Record of Surveys at Page 46, Fresno County Records, the following 2 courses:

3. North 1°06’32” West, 20.00 feet to the North right-of-way line of Behymer Avenue; thence

4. North 89°22’30” East, 1584.19 feet along the North right-of-way line of Behymer Avenue; thence
Leaving the right-of-way of Behymer Avenue, parallel with and 20.00 feet North of the North line of said Northwest quarter, continuing along the Easterly lines of Parcel 1 as well as the Easterly lines of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 2170 according to the map thereof recorded in Volume 13 of Parcel Maps at Page 35, Fresno County Records, also being the centerline of Enterprise Canal for the following 6 courses:

5. South 14°39’10” East, 679.67 feet along said Enterprise Canal; thence

6. South 26°57’27” East, 37.00 feet continuing along said Enterprise Canal; thence

7. South 48°08’27” East, 149.44 feet; thence

8. South 0°13’46” East, 294.28 feet; thence

9. South 24°09’58” East, 170.98 feet; thence

10. South 5°53’29” East, 99.75 feet; thence
Leaving the centerline of Enterprise Canal and running along the North line of Adjusted Parcel B of Lot Line Adjustment No. 21-06 as described in Grant Deed recorded on September 8, 2021 as Document No. 2021-0146955, Official Records Fresno County; along the East and South lines of said Adjusted Parcel B, being the following 15 courses:

11. North 89°22’23” East, 61.02 feet; thence

12. South 0°59’37” East, 72.67 feet to a tangent curve concave to the Northwest; thence
1920
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

13. 101.97 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 26°33'24" having a radius of 220.00 feet; thence

14. South 25°33’46” West, 342.65 feet to a tangent curve concave to the Southeast; thence

15. 129.78 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 26°33'24" having a radius of 280.00 feet; thence

16. South 0°59’37” East, 492.40 feet; thence

17. South 5°41’23” East, 180.24 feet; thence

18. South 5°16’32” East, 241.23 feet; thence

19. South 17°21’08” East, 355.48 feet to a tangent curve concave to the Northeast; thence

20. 226.11 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 74°01'42" having a radius of 175.00 feet; thence

21. North 88°37’10” East, 159.93 feet; thence

22. North 83°58’08” East, 159.90 feet; thence

23. North 78°57’55” East, 272.20 feet to the East line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 20; thence

24. South 0°56’40” East, 70.49 feet along said East line; thence

25. South 89°22’03” West, 1324.97 feet along said North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence
Along the East and South line of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 20 according to the map of Tract Map No. 6050 thereof recorded in Volume 90 of Plats at

26. South 1°01’26” East, 1956.64 feet along the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 20 to a point on the North line Shepherd Avenue right-of-way; thence

27. South 89°21’21” West, 1322.00 feet along the North right-of-way line for Shepherd Avenue to a point on the East line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 19; thence

28. South 1°06’32” East, 30.00 feet along said East line to the POINT OF

BEGINNING
CONTAINS 200.38 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
1921
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Attachment 3
RESOLUTION 24-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS APPROVING A VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR A 385-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION ON APPROXIMATELY 58.9 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF NORTH

MINNEWAWA AVENUE BETWEEN EAST PERRIN AND EAST SHEPHERD AVENUES WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, LLC (“Applicant”), 8080 N. Palm Avenue Suite 110, Fresno, CA 93711, submitted an application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6375 (“TM6375”) for a 385-lot single-family subdivision on approximately 58.9 acres of property (“Project”) located east of North Minnewawa Avenue between East Perrin and East Shepherd Avenues (“Property”); and
WHEREAS, the City published notice of the public hearing in the Fresno Business Journal on December 2, 2024, mailed public notices to property owners within 600 feet of the Property ten (10) days prior to said City Council hearing, and otherwise posted notice of the Public Hearing according to applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered TM6375 on November 21, 2024, at which time the Commission voted and adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve said map; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission’s recommendations were forwarded to the City Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed hearing was held on December 16, 2024, at which time the City Council considered TM6375; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has given careful consideration to this map December 16, 2024, and considered the considered the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) analysis outlined in the staff report and elsewhere in the Administrative Record which determines that TM6375 meets the requirements pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and recommends that the City Council adopt of an environmental finding of a mitigated negative declaration and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the entire Administrative Record relating to this map, which is on file with the City of Clovis Department of Planning and Development Services, and reviewed and considered those portions of the Administrative Record determined to be necessary to make an informed decision, including, but not limited to, the staff report, the written materials submitted with the request, and the verbal and written testimony and other evidence presented during the public hearing, and the conditions of approval attached as Attachment B to this Resolution, which are incorporated herein by this reference.

NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ENTIRE RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AND FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council hereby approves TM6375 as shown in Attachment A, subject to the City’s Council’s approval of as annexation, and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Attachment B to this Resolution.
1922
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

2. The Project satisfies the required findings for approval of a tentative tract map, as follows:
a. The proposed map, subdivision design, and improvements are consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
b. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development. c. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
d. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health or safety problems.
e. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. This finding may also be made if the review authority finds that alternate easements for access or use will be provided, and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This finding shall apply only to easements of record, or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, and no authority is hereby granted to the review authority to determine that the public at large has acquired easements of access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. f. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
g. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities.
h. The proposed subdivision, its design, density, and type of development and improvements conform to the regulations of this Development Code and the regulations of any public agency having jurisdiction by law.

3. The City Council has adopted the mitigated negative declaration mitigation and monitoring and reporting program for the TM6375 Project.

4. Without the conditions of approval (Attachment B of this resolution), the City Council could not make the findings necessary for approval of TM6375 (attached and labeled Attachment A).
1923
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

5. The basis for the findings is detailed in the December 16, 2024, staff report, which is hereby incorporated by reference, the entire Administrative Record, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the Public Hearing. * * * * *
The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on December 16, 2024, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:
______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk
1924
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

PROJECT TITLE SHEET DESCRIPTION Y&H No. Dr. By: Ch. By: Date: Sheet No. of Sheets Plot By: Alec Sandoval Plot Date: 10/29/2024 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 1.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727 TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Project No. APPROVALSAPPROVED (INITIALS) REVISIONS DATE APPROVED CITY OF CLOVIS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FEE ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STREETS PARKS SOLID WASTE UTILITIES CR 1 6 TRACT NO. 6375 MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERD COVER SHEET BB 8/8/2023 21-156 BASIS OF BEARINGS LEGEND SITE INFORMATION EXISTING TREES EXISTING BUILDINGS EXISTING LAND USE EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING PLANNED LAND USE SOURCE OF WATER SOURCE OF SEWER SOURCE OF GAS SOURCE OF TELEPHONE SOURCE OF ELECTRICITY ASSESSOR'S NUMBERS SITE AREA SITE ADDRESS VICINITY MAP: PROJECT SITE NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUESEE SHEET 5 SEE SHEET 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CLOVIS AVENUE BARON AVENUE PREPARED BY: SUBDIVIDER: OWNER: NOTES: PARKING SPACE ANALYSIS (LOTS 1-188): LOT INFO: SEE SHEET 3 SEE SHEET 4 Attachment A 1925 NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE 10 2,185 S.F. 11 2,185 S.F. 12 2,185 S.F. 19 2,183 S.F. 18 2,183 S.F. 55 2,184 S.F. 54 2,184 S.F. 59 2,184 S.F. 58 2,184 S.F. 57 2,184 S.F. 56 2,184 S.F. 139 2,184 S.F. 140 2,184 S.F. 141 2,184 S.F. 142 2,184 S.F. 143 2,184 S.F. 151 2,464 S.F. 153 2,184 S.F. 154 2,184 S.F. 155 2,184 S.F. 163 2,184 S.F. 164 2,184 S.F. 165 2,184 S.F. 173 2,184 S.F. 174 2,184 S.F. 175 2,184 S.F. 8 2,614 S.F. 7 2,234 S.F. 6 2,234 S.F. 4 2,234 S.F. 3 2,234 S.F. 5 2,234 S.F. 2 2,234 S.F. 1 2,514 S.F. 9 2,744 S.F. 20 2,744 S.F. 17 2,183 S.F. 31 2,184 S.F. 30 2,184 S.F. 22 2,184 S.F. 23 2,184 S.F. 24 2,184 S.F. 21 2,744 S.F. 32 2,744 S.F. 43 2,184 S.F. 42 2,184 S.F. 36 2,184 S.F. 34 2,184 S.F. 35 2,184 S.F. 33 2,744 S.F. 44 2,744 S.F. 60 2,630 S.F. 52 2,458 S.F. 45 2,630 S.F. 46 2,184 S.F. 47 2,184 S.F. 48 2,184 S.F. 49 2,184 S.F. 50 2,184 S.F. 51 2,184 S.F. 53 2,458 S.F. 150 2,184 S.F. 149 2,184 S.F. 148 2,184 S.F. 147 2,184 S.F. 146 2,184 S.F. 144 2,355 S.F. 138 2,464 S.F. 145 2,355 S.F. 160 2,184 S.F. 159 2,184 S.F. 158 2,184 S.F. 157 2,744 S.F. 156 2,744 S.F. 167 2,744 S.F. 170 2,184 S.F. 169 2,184 S.F. 168 2,184 S.F. 166 2,744 S.F. 180 2,184 S.F. 179 2,184 S.F. 178 2,184 S.F. 177 2,744 S.F. 176 2,744 S.F. 188 2,328 S.F. 187 2,223 S.F. 186 2,195 S.F. 185 2,167 S.F. 184 2,140 S.F. 183 2,112 S.F. 182 2,356 S.F. 29 2,184 S.F. 41 2,184 S.F. 13 2,185 S.F. 16 2,183 S.F. 14 2,620 S.F. 15 2,620 S.F. 25 2,184 S.F. 28 2,184 S.F. 27 2,620 S.F. 26 2,620 S.F. 37 2,184 S.F. 40 2,184 S.F. 39 2,620 S.F. 38 2,620 S.F. 181 2,620 S.F. 172 2,620 S.F. 162 2,620 S.F. 171 2,620 S.F. 152 2,620 S.F. 161 2,620 S.F.OUTLOT A 309,350 S.F. OUTLOT A 309,350 S.F. OUTLOT A 309,350 S.F. BLOOM AVENUE VINTAGE AVENUEHEIRLOOM LANE PROJECT TITLE SHEET DESCRIPTION Y&H No. Dr. By: Ch. By: Date: Sheet No. of Sheets Plot By: Alec Sandoval Plot Date: 10/29/2024 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 2.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727 TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Project No. APPROVALSAPPROVED (INITIALS) REVISIONS DATE APPROVED CITY OF CLOVIS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FEE ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STREETS PARKS SOLID WASTE UTILITIES CR 2 6 TRACT NO. 6375 MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERD MULTI-FAMILY BB 8/8/2023 21-156 SEE SHEET 4 SEE SHEET 3 LEGEND 1926
55 2,184 S.F. 54 2,184 S.F. 59 2,184 S.F. 58 2,184 S.F. 57 2,184 S.F. 56 2,184 S.F. 62 2,184 S.F. 63 2,184 S.F. 64 2,184 S.F. 76 2,184 S.F. 74 2,184 S.F. 75 2,184 S.F. 139 2,184 S.F. 140 2,184 S.F. 141 2,184 S.F. 142 2,184 S.F. 143 2,184 S.F. 151 2,464 S.F. 60 2,630 S.F. 52 2,458 S.F. 45 2,630 S.F. 46 2,184 S.F. 47 2,184 S.F. 48 2,184 S.F. 49 2,184 S.F. 50 2,184 S.F. 51 2,184 S.F. 53 2,458 S.F. 71 2,184 S.F. 70 2,184 S.F. 69 2,184 S.F. 61 2,744 S.F. 72 2,744 S.F. 81 2,184 S.F. 82 2,184 S.F. 83 2,184 S.F. 73 2,744 S.F. 84 2,744 S.F. 95 2,184 S.F. 94 2,184 S.F. 93 2,184 S.F. 86 2,184 S.F. 87 2,184 S.F. 88 2,184 S.F. 85 2,744 S.F. 96 2,744 S.F. 109 2,184 S.F. 110 2,184 S.F. 111 2,184 S.F. 116 2,184 S.F. 115 2,184 S.F. 114 2,184 S.F. 113 2,744 S.F. 112 2,744 S.F. 120 2,184 S.F. 121 2,184 S.F. 119 2,184 S.F. 126 2,184 S.F. 125 2,184 S.F. 124 2,184 S.F. 123 2,744 S.F. 122 2,744 S.F. 130 2,184 S.F. 131 2,184 S.F. 129 2,184 S.F. 135 2,184 S.F. 134 2,184 S.F. 133 2,744 S.F. 136 2,184 S.F. 132 2,744 S.F. 150 2,184 S.F. 149 2,184 S.F. 148 2,184 S.F. 147 2,184 S.F. 146 2,184 S.F. 144 2,355 S.F. 138 2,464 S.F. 145 2,355 S.F. 99 2,204 S.F. 100 2,204 S.F. 97 2,480 S.F. 98 2,204 S.F. 101 2,204 S.F. 102 2,778 S.F. 65 2,184 S.F. 68 2,184 S.F. 67 2,620 S.F. 66 2,620 S.F. 80 2,184 S.F. 77 2,184 S.F. 78 2,620 S.F. 79 2,620 S.F. 92 2,184 S.F. 89 2,184 S.F. 90 2,620 S.F. 91 2,620 S.F. 103 2,769 S.F. 107 2,492 S.F. 106 2,204 S.F. 105 2,204 S.F. 104 2,204 S.F. 137 2,620 S.F. 128 2,620 S.F. 118 2,620 S.F. 127 2,620 S.F. 117 2,620 S.F. 108 2,620 S.F. OUTLOT A 309,350 S.F. OUTLOT A 309,350 S.F. OUTLOT A 309,350 S.F. OUTLOT B 21,769 S.F. OUTLOT C 24,868 S.F. HEIRLOOM LANE BLOOM AVENUE VINTAGE LANE NORTH DEWITT AVENUE PROJECT TITLE SHEET DESCRIPTION Y&H No. Dr. By: Ch. By: Date: Sheet No. of Sheets Plot By: Alec Sandoval Plot Date: 10/29/2024 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 3.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727 TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Project No. APPROVALSAPPROVED (INITIALS) REVISIONS DATE APPROVED CITY OF CLOVIS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FEE ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STREETS PARKS SOLID WASTE UTILITIES CR 3 6 TRACT NO. 6375 MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERD MULTI-FAMILY BB 8/8/2023 21-156 SEE SHEET 4 SEE SHEET 5 SEE SHEET 2 LEGEND 1927

SUMMERSET AVENUE

NORTH DEWITT AVENUE NORTH PERRY AVENUE

NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE SUMMERSET AVENUE
NORTH OXFORD AVENUE WINDMILL AVENUE NORTH HARVARD AVENUE NORTH DARTMOUTH AVENUE WINDMILL AVENUE NORTH CHERRY LANE 22 21 23 55 2,184 S.F. 54 2,184 S.F. 56 2,184 S.F. 195 4,230 S.F. 196 4,230 S.F. 189 4,719 S.F. 197 4,230 S.F. 190 4,230 S.F. 198 4,230 S.F. 191 4,230 S.F. 199 4,230 S.F. 192 4,230 S.F. 200 4,230 S.F. 193 4,230 S.F. 201 4,230 S.F. 194 4,230 S.F. 216 4,500 S.F. 215 4,500 S.F. 214 4,500 S.F. 213 4,500 S.F. 212 4,500 S.F. 211 4,500 S.F. 210 4,500 S.F. 217 4,893 S.F. 209 9,292 S.F. 220 4,500 S.F. 221 4,500 S.F. 222 4,500 S.F. 223 4,500 S.F. 224 4,500 S.F. 218 4,899 S.F. 219 4,500 S.F. 207 4,232 S.F. 208 10,199 S.F. 204 4,230 S.F. 205 4,230 S.F. 206 4,230 S.F. 229 4,700 S.F. 230 4,699 S.F. 231 4,230 S.F. 232 4,230 S.F. 233 4,230 S.F. 234 4,230 S.F. 235 4,700 S.F. 276 4,230 S.F. 275 4,230 S.F. 274 4,230 S.F. 273 4,230 S.F. 272 4,230 S.F. 277 4,595 S.F. 292 4,500 S.F. 291 4,500 S.F. 290 4,500 S.F. 289 4,500 S.F. 288 4,500 S.F. 287 4,500 S.F. 286 5,277 S.F. 293 4,894 S.F. 307 4,500 S.F. 294 4,500 S.F. 306 4,500 S.F. 295 4,500 S.F. 305 4,500 S.F. 296 4,500 S.F. 304 4,500 S.F. 297 4,500 S.F. 303 4,500 S.F. 298 4,500 S.F. 302 4,500 S.F. 299 4,500 S.F. 301 5,278 S.F. 300 5,278 S.F. 319 4,700 S.F. 318 4,886 S.F. 313 4,230 S.F. 308 4,595 S.F. 309 4,230 S.F. 310 4,230 S.F. 311 4,230 S.F. 312 4,230 S.F. 316 4,230 S.F. 314 4,230 S.F. 315 4,230 S.F. 320 9,979 S.F. 325 4,500 S.F. 326 4,500 S.F. 327 4,500 S.F. 328 4,500 S.F. 321 9,858 S.F. 322 4,500 S.F. 323 4,500 S.F. 324 4,500 S.F. 329 5,493 S.F. 351 4,500 S.F. 350 4,500 S.F. 349 4,500 S.F. 348 4,500 S.F. 347 4,500 S.F. 353 4,500 S.F. 352 4,500 S.F. 346 5,447 S.F. 354 9,867 S.F. 359 4,700 S.F. 358 4,700 S.F. 357 4,700 S.F. 356 4,700 S.F. 355 10,067 S.F. 360 9,979 S.F. 365 4,500 S.F. 366 4,500 S.F. 367 4,500 S.F. 368 4,500 S.F. 361 9,876 S.F. 362 4,500 S.F. 363 4,498 S.F. 364 4,500 S.F. 369 5,458 S.F. 336 4,500 S.F. 339 4,500 S.F. 335 4,500 S.F. 340 4,500 S.F. 334 4,500 S.F. 341 4,500 S.F. 333 4,500 S.F. 342 4,500 S.F. 332 4,500 S.F. 343 4,500 S.F. 331 4,500 S.F. 344 4,500 S.F. 330 5,281 S.F. 345 5,282 S.F. 338 4,892 S.F. 337 4,893 S.F. 376 4,500 S.F. 375 4,500 S.F. 374 4,500 S.F. 373 4,500 S.F. 372 4,500 S.F. 371 4,500 S.F. 381 4,500 S.F. 383 4,500 S.F. 379 4,500 S.F. 380 4,500 S.F. 377 5,285 S.F. 378 5,284 S.F. 385 4,893 S.F. 370 4,892 S.F. 384 4,500 S.F. 382 4,500 S.F. 317 4,230 S.F. 4 2,234 S.F. 3 2,234 S.F. 2 2,234 S.F. 1 2,514 S.F. 52 2,458 S.F. 49 2,184 S.F. 50 2,184 S.F. 51 2,184 S.F. 53 2,458 S.F. 13 2,185 S.F. 16 2,183 S.F. 14 2,620 S.F. 15 2,620 S.F. 25 2,184 S.F. 28 2,184 S.F. 27 2,620 S.F. 26 2,620 S.F. 37 2,184 S.F. 40 2,184 S.F. 39 2,620 S.F. 38 2,620 S.F. 99 2,204 S.F. 100 97 2,480 S.F. 98 2,204 S.F. 65 2,184 S.F. 68 2,184 S.F. 67 2,620 S.F. 66 2,620 S.F. 80 2,184 S.F. 77 2,184 S.F. 78 2,620 S.F. 79 2,620 S.F. 92 2,184 S.F. 89 2,184 S.F. 90 2,620 S.F. 91 2,620 S.F. 228 4,232 S.F. 225 4,500 S.F. 227 10,368 S.F. 226 9,261 S.F. 202 4,230 S.F. OUTLOT A 309,350 S.F. OUTLOT A 309,350 S.F. 203 4,230 S.F. OUTLOT D 9,788 S.F. SEE SHEET 2 SEE SHEET 3 HEIRLOOM LANE HEIRLOOM LANE SEE SHEET 5 PROJECT TITLE SHEET DESCRIPTION Y&H No. Dr. By: Ch. By: Date: Sheet No. of Sheets Plot By: Alec Sandoval Plot Date: 10/29/2024 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 4.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727 TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Project No. APPROVALSAPPROVED (INITIALS) REVISIONS DATE APPROVED CITY OF CLOVIS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FEE ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STREETS PARKS SOLID WASTE UTILITIES CR 4 6 TRACT NO. 6375 MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERD RESIDENTIAL BB 8/8/2023 21-156 LEGEND 1928

SUMMERSET AVENUE
NORTH DEWITT AVENUE NORTH PERRY AVENUE NORTH WALKER AVENUE WINDMILL AVENUE NORTH RALPH AVENUE CLOVIS AVENUE WINDMILL AVENUE 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 23 REMAINDER 5,031 S.F. 220 4,500 S.F. 221 4,500 S.F. 222 4,500 S.F. 223 4,500 S.F. 224 4,500 S.F. 218 4,899 S.F. 219 4,500 S.F. 229 4,700 S.F. 230 4,699 S.F. 231 4,230 S.F. 232 4,230 S.F. 233 4,230 S.F. 234 4,230 S.F. 235 4,700 S.F. 249 6,091 S.F. 240 4,500 S.F. 244 5,495 S.F. 245 5,492 S.F. 243 4,500 S.F. 246 4,500 S.F. 242 4,500 S.F. 247 4,500 S.F. 241 4,500 S.F. 248 4,566 S.F. 238 4,500 S.F. 250 9,448 S.F. 237 5,954 S.F. 239 4,500 S.F. 251 7,501 S.F. 253 4,500 S.F. 254 5,483 S.F. 255 7,728 S.F.256 12,851 S.F. 252 4,500 S.F. 265 4,230 S.F. 276 4,230 S.F. 275 4,230 S.F. 274 4,230 S.F. 273 4,230 S.F. 272 4,230 S.F. 271 4,230 S.F. 270 4,230 S.F. 269 4,230 S.F. 268 4,230 S.F. 267 4,230 S.F. 266 4,230 S.F. 259 4,230 S.F. 264 4,230 S.F. 263 4,230 S.F. 262 4,230 S.F. 261 4,230 S.F. 260 4,230 S.F. 277 4,595 S.F. 258 5,592 S.F. 292 4,500 S.F. 291 4,500 S.F. 290 4,500 S.F. 289 4,500 S.F. 288 4,500 S.F. 287 4,500 S.F. 286 5,277 S.F. 293 4,894 S.F. 284 4,500 S.F. 278 4,893 S.F. 279 4,500 S.F. 280 4,500 S.F. 281 4,500 S.F. 282 4,500 S.F. 283 4,500 S.F. 285 5,277 S.F. 307 4,500 S.F. 294 4,500 S.F. 306 4,500 S.F. 295 4,500 S.F. 305 4,500 S.F. 296 4,500 S.F. 304 4,500 S.F. 297 4,500 S.F. 303 4,500 S.F. 298 4,500 S.F. 302 4,500 S.F. 299 4,500 S.F. 301 5,278 S.F. 300 5,278 S.F. 308 4,595 S.F. 309 4,230 S.F. 310 4,230 S.F. 311 4,230 S.F. 99 2,204 S.F. 100 97 2,480 S.F. 98 2,204 S.F. 92 2,184 S.F. 91 2,620 S.F. 228 4,232 S.F. 225 4,500 S.F. 227 10,368 S.F. 226 9,261 S.F. 387 223,441 S.F. 386 17,281 S.F. 236 7,696 S.F. 257 17,353 S.F. OUTLOT F 984 S.F. OUTLOT E OUTLOT D 9,788 S.F. OUTLOT G 53,420 S.F. BARON AVENUE CLOVIS AVENUE NORTH DEWITT AVENUE PROJECT TITLE SHEET DESCRIPTION Y&H No. Dr. By: Ch. By: Date: Sheet No. of Sheets Plot By: Alec Sandoval Plot Date: 10/29/2024 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 5.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727 TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Project No. APPROVALSAPPROVED (INITIALS) REVISIONS DATE APPROVED CITY OF CLOVIS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FEE ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STREETS PARKS SOLID WASTE UTILITIES CR 5 6 TRACT NO. 6375 MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERD RESIDENTIAL BB 8/8/2023 21-156 SEE SHEET 3 SEE SHEET 2 1929
PROJECT TITLE SHEET DESCRIPTION Y&H No. Dr. By: Ch. By: Date: Sheet No. of Sheets Plot By: Alec Sandoval Plot Date: 10/29/2024 File Location: F:\2021\21-156\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\21-156_TTM_SHT 6.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727 TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Project No. APPROVALSAPPROVED (INITIALS) REVISIONS DATE APPROVED CITY OF CLOVIS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FEE ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STREETS PARKS SOLID WASTE UTILITIES CR 6 6 TRACT NO. 6375 MINNEWAWA & SHEPHERD CROSS SECTIONS BB 8/8/2023 21-156 NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE DETAIL 24' ALLEY DETAIL F AA NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE DETAIL A 50' LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREET D 37.2' ALLEY DETAIL E 50' LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREET C 56' LOCAL STREET DETAIL B 73' LOCAL STREET DETAIL G 68' LOCAL STREET DETAIL GG NORTH DEWITT AVENUE H NORTH CLOVIS AVENUE I 1930 Attachment B
Conditions of Approval – TM6375
Planning Division Comments
(Liz Salazar, Assistant Planner – 559-324-2305)

1. The developer shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Project, included as Attachment 8 to the staff report.

2. TM6375 is approved per Attachment A.

3. This Project is subject to the development standards of the Heritage Grove Master Plan.

4. Prezone 2024-005 approves an R-1-PRD (Planned Residential Development) Zone District for the Project site. Density shall be consistent with the Medium Density Land Use Designation of the Clovis General Plan.

5. The proposed project shall produce a comprehensive development of superior quality than which might otherwise occur from more traditional development on the site which will be reviewed and approved through the civil plan review process and residential site plan review (RSPR).

6. The developer shall enter into a Homeowner’s Association (HOA) covenant regarding the maintenance of open space, common areas, and private drive aisles. Such agreements shall be disclosed to all future home buyers. The HOA shall be formed and functioning prior to tract acceptance.

7. The developer shall obtain City approval in advance of temporary and permanent subdivision signs through separate sign review, consistent with the development criteria of the Development Code Sign Ordinance.

8. No more than two of the same unit type (floor layout and exterior materials package) shall be repeated side by side. When two of the same units are repeated side by side, they shall be different colors. These identical provisions may be waived by the City Planner on a specific lot basis within the project when the size or configuration of a lot would otherwise prevent compliance with the above requirements of any other siting or setback/yard requirements established under this application. If such a waiver is requested, the developer and City Planner shall work together to ensure that any sitings of units not in compliance with the above requirements shall be of different materials and elevations in order to minimize any adverse visual impacts that may result.

9. TM6375 is subject to the development standards of Planned Development Permit (PDP) 2024-001 and any amendments thereafter. Any development standards not expressed within PDP2024-001 and TM6375 shall be subject to the underlying Zone District R-1-PRD Standards and Guidelines, and the Development Code.
1931
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

10.A RSPR is required to memorialize building plans and elevations for the different product types of TM6375. Specific color and materials of the models, walls, amenities, landscaping, and fencing will be evaluated through the civil plans.

11.Setbacks shall be measured to the exterior face of the framing of the structure. Exceptions to the setbacks are identified in section 9.24.100, of the Development Code.

12.Development standards for the lots of TM6375 shall be as follows:

Standard
Housing Products
Wilde
(188 units)
Treasures
(90 units)
Core
(107 units)
Minimum Lot Size (Square Feet) 2,112 4,230 4,230
Minimum Parcel Width 39’ 45’ 45’
Minimum Corner Parcel Width N/A 50’ 50’
Minimum Reverse Parcel Width N/A 55’ 55’
Minimum Parcel Depth 53’ 94’ 94’
Maximum Lot Coverage 62% 52% 45%
Maximum Height 26’ 7” 18’ 11” 25’ 3”
Front (Garage side) Setback 4’ 20’ 20’
Front (Living side) Setback 10’ 12’ 12’
Interior Side Setback
0’ non-patio
side 7’ patio
side
5’
5’
Street Side Setbacks 3’ 10’ 10’
Rear Setback 10’ 10’ 20’
Garages
20’x20’ interior
dimension (2-
car)
20’x20’
interior
dimension
(2-car)
20’x20’
interior
dimension
(2-car)

13.North Minnewawa Avenue is designated as a thematic street and shall have an 18-foot parkway, with a 9-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the right-of-way, 5-foot walk, and 4-foot landscape buffer setback.

14.Clovis Avenue is designated as a community boulevard and shall have an 20-foot parkway, with a 10-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the right-of-way, 6-foot walk, and 4-foot landscape buffer setback.

15.The developer shall construct a minimum six-foot high solid split face masonry wall along the limits of TM6375 adjacent to N. Minnewawa and Clovis Avenue.

16.Each lot with a zero (0) foot interior setback shall enter into a recordable covenant that provides access to each abutting property for repair and maintenance and other provisions as deemed necessary by the Planning and Development Services Director. 1932
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

17.To ensure consistency with the conditions of approval for TM6375, the developer shall provide, for the Planning Department’s review and approval, a copy of the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions prior to start of construction of homes on any lots.

18.The developer shall utilize street lights along local and private streets within the development area that are of the same design and luminosity as surrounding developments within Heritage Grove.

19.The developer shall contribute a proportionate share towards the acquisition and development of future parks in order for the City to maintain its adopted ratio of providing four (4) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, as stated in Policy 1.1 in the Open Space and Conservation Element of the 2014 General Plan. The proportionate fair share will be accessed by the Engineering Division.

20.All lighting shall be screened from direct view from the public right-of-way and adjacent residential properties.

21.All landscaping (open space and private yards) shall conform to the City of Clovis Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

22.Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved separately by the landscape review committee with the civil set for tree and landscape type and location.

23.Lots 1-188 shall provide an all-weather surface and path for the placement and storage of trash toters. The paved path shall lead from the street to the fenced noncovered patio areas within the 7-foot side yard to the street. The fenced noncovered patio area shall provide gate access.

24.Placement of trash toters for service pick-up shall be approved by the Engineering Division.

The developer shall restrict parking on trash service days along private streets as necessary in order to accommodate service for lots 1-188. If deemed necessary “Bloom Avenue” may be required as a private street to maintain “no parking” on trash service days. A minimum of 188 guest parking shall be maintained within the Wilde Series.

25.Landscape features and forms within amenity areas shall be consistent with Heritage Grove Design Guidelines. Details shall be provided in the construction plan.

26.Three (3) pocket parks totaling approximately 56,400 square feet with associated amenities shall be constructed as the private amenity.

27.As a public amenity for the Project, the developer shall contribute the dollar amount totaling $95,450 to the City for utilization in existing or future open space and/or park improvements.

28.The developer shall record a Covenant regarding a “right to farm,” for adjacent property owners. Such agreement shall be disclosed to all future home buyers. 1933
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

29.The applicant shall record a Notice of Nonconformance dealing with any structure used for model homes where the garage is converted for the use as a sales office.

30.Upon final recordation of this vesting tentative tract map, it shall be the applicant’s responsibility to furnish to the Planning Department an electronic (PDF) copy of the original map obtained from the Fresno County Recorder’s Office.

31.The applicant shall relay all conditions of approval for TM6375 to all subsequent purchasers of individual lots, if applicable, and/or to subsequent purchasers of this entire tract map development.

32.Prior to the final map acceptance, the developer shall incorporate an 8-foot wide pedestrian easement along the eastern property line, adjacent to the future City water storage tank(s) site.

Fire Department Conditions
(Rick Fultz, Fire Department Representative – 559-324-2224) Roads/ Access

33.Two Points of Access: Any development to this parcel will require a minimum of two (2) points of access to be reviewed and approved by the Clovis Fire Department. All required access drives shall remain accessible during all phases of construction which includes paving, concrete work, underground work, landscaping, perimeter walls. Developments of one- or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads.

34.Street Width for Single Family Residences: Minimum Access Road Width of 36 feet for Single Family Residences. Roads 36 feet or wider allow for Parking on both sides of street.

35.Exception Streets with houses on only one side of the street: Roads 32 feet or greater, to less than 36 feet in width require Fire Lane Markings on one side of the street. Parking is allowed on one side of street.

36.Street Width: Fire apparatus access width shall be determined by measuring from “base of curb” to “base of curb” for roadways that have curbs. When roadways do not have curbs, the measurements shall be from the edge of the roadway surface (approved all weather surface).

37.Turning Radius: All access way roads constructed shall be designed with a minimum outside turning radius of forty-five feet (45’).

38.Temporary Street Signs: The applicant shall install temporary street signs that meet City Temporary Street Sign Standard #1.9 prior to issuance of building permits within a subdivision.
1934
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

39.All Weather Access &Water Supply: The applicant shall provide all weather access to the site during all phases of construction to the satisfaction of the approved Clovis Fire Department Standard #1.2 or #1.3.

40.Private Street Names: Private street names shall be consistent with public street names to the north and south or to the east and west alignments as approved by the Fire Department.

41.Fire Access – Landscape Obstruction: Landscaping trees or shrubs located adjacent to the fire access drives shall be of the type that will not impede fire access due to their growth process.

Fire Hydrants

42.Residential Fire Hydrant: 4 ½” x 2 ½” approved Residential Type fire hydrant(s) and “Blue Dot” hydrant locators, paint fire hydrant(s) yellow with blue top and caps, and paint the curb red shall be installed as specified by the adopted Clovis Fire Department Standard #1.4. Plans shall be submitted to the Clovis Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. The hydrants shall be charged and in operation prior to any framing or combustible material being brought onto the site. Hydrants curb markings and blue dots to be completed prior to occupancy of any homes.

43.Looped Water Main: The applicant shall install approved looped water main capable of the necessary flow of water for adequate fire protection and approved by the Clovis Fire Department
Engineering / Utilities / Solid Waste Division Conditions (Sean Smith, Engineering Division Representative – 559-324-2363) (Paul Armendariz, Department Representative – 559-324-2649) Maps and Plans

44.The applicant shall have a final tract map prepared, in the form prescribed by the Subdivision Map Act and City of Clovis Municipal Code. The final tract map shall be submitted to the City of Clovis Engineering Division, and should include, but not be limited to, final tract map, the current filing fee, closure calculations, current preliminary title report, legal descriptions and drawings of required dedications.

45.The applicant shall submit separately to the City of Clovis Engineering Division, a set of construction plans on 24" x 36" sheets with City standard title block for all required improvements and a current preliminary title report. These plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer, and shall include a grading plan, landscape plan, a site plan showing trash enclosure locations and an overall site utility plan showing locations and sizes of sewer, water, storm drain, and irrigation mains, laterals, manholes, meters, valves, hydrants, fire sprinkler services, other facilities, etc. Plan check and inspection fees per 1935
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

City of Clovis Resolution No. 23-34 shall be paid with the first submittal of said plans. All plans shall be submitted at or before the time the building plans are submitted to the Building Division and shall be approved by the City and all other involved agencies prior to the release of any development permits.

46.Prior to the initial submittal of the improvement plans, the applicant shall contact Sean Smith at (559) 324-2363 to setup a coordination meeting (Pre-submittal Meeting).

47.Upon approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall provide the City with the appropriate number of copies. After all improvements have been constructed and accepted by the City, the applicant shall submit to the City of Clovis Engineering Division (1) digital copy to the City in PDF format of the approved set of construction plans revised to accurately reflect all field conditions and revisions and marked "AS-BUILT" for review and approval. Upon approval of the AS-BUILTs by the City, and prior to granting of final occupancy or final acceptance, the applicant shall provide to the City (1) digital copy in PDF format and two (2) bond copies.

48.The applicant shall comply with reporting requirements in accordance with Government Code 65940.1, which requires the City to, “request from a development proponent, upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the final inspection, whichever occurs last, the total amount of fees and exactions associated with the project for which the certificate was issued. The City shall post this information on its internet website, and update it at least twice per year.”
General Provisions

49.The applicant shall pay all applicable development fees at the rate in effect at the time of payment and prior to final map approval by Council or have the fees payable directly to the City through a separate escrow account at the time of recordation of the map.

50.The applicant is advised that, pursuant to California Government Code, Section 66020, any party may protest the imposition of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions imposed on a development project by a local agency. Protests shall be filed in accordance with the provisions of the California Government Code and shall be filed within 90 days after conditional approval of this application is granted. The 90 day protest period for this project shall begin on the “date of approval” as indicated on the “Acknowledgment of Acceptance of Conditions” form.

51.All reimbursement requests shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the requirements of the current version of the “Developer Reimbursement Procedures” a copy of which may be obtained at the City Engineer’s Office.

52.The applicant shall install all improvements within public right-of-way and easements in accordance with the City of Clovis standards, specifications, master plans, and record drawings in effect at the time of improvement plan approval. 1936
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

53.The applicant shall address all conditions, and be responsible for obtaining encroachment permits from the City of Clovis for all work performed within the City's right-of-way and easements.

54.The applicant shall submit a soils report or a waiver of soils report to the City of Clovis Engineering Division for approval by the City Engineer.

55.The applicant shall provide and pay for all geotechnical services per City policy.

56.The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the local utility, telephone, and cable companies. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to notify the local utility, telephone, and cable companies for the removal or relocation of utility poles where necessary. The City shall not accept first submittals without proof that the applicant has provided the improvement plans and documents showing all proposed work to the utility, telephone, and cable companies. All utility vaults in which lids cannot be sloped to match proposed finished grading, local utilities have 5% max slope, shall be located in sidewalk areas with pedestrian lids so the lid slope matches sidewalk cross slope.

57.All existing overhead and new utility facilities located on-site, within alleys, or within the street right-of-way along the streets adjacent to this tract shall be undergrounded unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

58.The applicant shall contact and address all requirements of the United States Postal Service Clovis Office for the location and type of mailboxes to be installed. The location of the facilities shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of improvement plans or any construction.

59.The applicant shall contact and address Caltrans requirements, and be responsible for obtaining encroachment permits from Caltrans for all work performed within the State rightof-way. The applicant shall be required to mitigate impacts to State Highway facilities as determined by the City Engineer.

Dedications and Street Improvements

60.The applicant shall provide right-of-way acquisition or dedicate free and clear of all encumbrances and/or improve the following streets to City standards. The street improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s specific plans and shall match existing improvements. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the type, location, and grades of existing improvements.
a. North Minnewawa Avenue – dedicate to provide right-of-way acquisition for 42.5' (exist varies) east of centerline and 24.5’ (existing 20’) west of centerline, and improve with curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb return ramps, street lights, fiber optic conduit, landscape strip, 43' (20.5’ west + 22.5’ east) permanent paving, permanent paving and overlay as necessary to match the existing permanent pavement, 3' paved swale, and transitional paving as needed.
1937
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
b. North Clovis Avenue – dedicate to provide right-of-way acquisition for 106' (exist 0'), and improve with curb, gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, curb return ramps, street lights, fiber optic conduit, median island, median island landscaping and irrigation, landscape strip, 56' (28’ west + 28 east’) permanent paving, permanent paving and overlay as necessary to match the existing permanent pavement, 3' paved swale, and transitional paving as needed.
c. Interior Streets – Dedicate to provide for 50’ or 54’ of right-of-way in conformance with the City policy on street widths, and improve with curb, gutter, 5’ sidewalk adjacent to the curb, drive approaches, curb return ramps, streetlights, permanent paving, and all transitional paving as needed.
d. Cul-De-Sacs - dedicate to provide for 52' radius and improve with curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, 43' permanent paving and all transitional paving as needed. e. Install a traffic signal at North Baron and North Clovis Avenues and provide the necessary right-of-way for the signal in its ultimate location. f. The applicant shall relinquish all access to Clovis and Minnewawa Avenues. g. Median island turn pockets require the approval of the City Engineer.

61.The applicant shall provide a dedication for a 10' public utility easement, where applicable, along all public frontages. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining approval by the utilities companies where alternate widths are provided. The applicant shall provide to the City copies of all final easements prior to final map acceptance.

62.For new onsite ADA paths of travel that connect to the City sidewalk, the applicant shall replace enough sidewalk to provide a compliant landing with appropriate transitions to existing sidewalk grades.

63.The applicant shall remove and repair all damaged or broken concrete improvements. The City Engineer may require the repair of additional improvements if they are damaged prior to occupancy.

64.The applicant shall not install any fences, temporary or permanent in public right-of-way.

65.The applicant shall provide preliminary title report, legal description and drawings for all dedications required which are not on the site. All contact with owners, appraisers, etc. of the adjacent properties where dedication is needed shall be made only by the City. The City will prepare an estimate of acquisition costs including but not limited to appraised value, appraisal costs, negotiation costs, and administrative costs. The applicant shall pay such estimated costs as soon as they are determined by the City. 1938
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

66.The sideyard side of all corner lots shall have full width sidewalk except where planter strips or meandering sidewalk is proposed.

67.The applicant shall obtain "R Value" tests in quantity sufficient to represent all street areas, and have street structural sections designed by a registered civil engineer based on these "R Value" tests.

68.The applicant shall, at the ends of any permanent pavement abutting undeveloped property, install 2" x 6" redwood header boards that shall be placed prior to the street surfacing.

69.Standard barricades with reflectors shall be installed at ends of streets abutting undeveloped property and any other locations to be specified by the City Engineer.

Sewer

70.The applicant shall identify and abandon all septic systems to City standards.

71.The applicant shall install sanitary sewer mains of the size and in the locations indicated below, prior to occupancy. The sewer improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Any alternative routing of the mains shall require approval of the City Engineer and shall be supported by appropriate calculations. The improvements indicated below will provide temporary service until the improvements are installed that provide permanent service. a. North Minnewawa Avenue – install 12" main along frontage. b. North Clovis Avenue – install 10" main along frontage. c. Interior Streets – install 8" mains.

72.The applicant shall install one (1) 4" sewer service house branch to each lot within the tentative tract.

73.All existing sewer services that will not be used with this development shall be abandoned by cutting and capping the service at the right-of-way line.

74.The applicant shall notify all property owners annexed to the City and along streets where a new sewer main will be constructed to determine if they wish to be connected to City sewer. Property owners shall work directly with the applicant regarding costs and location.

The applicant shall notify property owners that sewer connection fees are required if they choose to connect.

75.The City cannot guarantee at this time that sewer capacity will be available for this development when site construction occurs. The applicant, therefore, waives any claim or demand against the City for any delay in availability of sewer capacity for this subdivision. 1939
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

76.Applicant acknowledges that sewage collection and treatment capacity for the area within which the proposed subdivision is located is extremely limited, and that capacity may not be available to provide service for the proposed subdivision at such time as applicant is ready to seek approval of a final map. Applicant acknowledges, understands, and agrees that if such sewage collection and treatment capacity is not available to serve the proposed subdivision, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis, the final map may not be approved. Notwithstanding the foregoing, applicant has freely and voluntarily chosen to proceed with the submittal and processing of the tentative map, intends to expend money, time and effort in connection therewith, and accepts the risks that the final map approval may be delayed until sufficient capacity is available as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis. Applicant agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Clovis from any and all claims, costs, expenses, and damages incurred or suffered by applicant, its principals, officers, employees, agents, or contractors, caused by, in connection with, or arising out of the unavailability of sewage collection or treatment capacity to serve the proposed subdivision, or the City’s refusal or failure to approve a final map for the proposed subdivision because of the unavailability of sewage collection or treatment.

a. Permanent service to the Project requires the improvements indicated below in accordance with the Sewer Master Plan. The City Engineer shall determine the timing of the improvements in the event they are installed by a City CIP project or development.
b. CIP Project 6-B (DeWolf Trunk Sewer System).
c. CIP Project 6-A (Shepherd / Willow Pump Station and Force Main System). d. CIP Project AA (Phase 2 STWRF Expansion).

Water

77.The applicant shall identify and abandon all water wells to City standards.

78.The applicant shall install water mains of the sizes and in the locations indicated below, and provide an adequately looped water system prior to occupancy. The water improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements.

The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Any alternative routing of the mains shall require approval of the City Engineer and shall be supported by appropriate calculations. a. North Minnewawa Avenue – install 12" main along frontage. b. North Clovis Avenue – install 12" main along frontage. c. Interior Streets – install 8" mains.
1940
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

d. Install facilities to provide separation between Pressure Zone 2 east of North Minnewawa Avenue and Pressure Zone 1 west of North Minnewawa Avenue.

79.The applicant shall install a City standard water service to each lot of the proposed subdivision. Water services shall be grouped at property lines to accommodate automatic meter reading system, including installation of connecting conduit. The water meter shall be placed in the sidewalk and not in planters or driveways.

80.All existing water services that will not be used with this development shall be abandoned by closing the service’s corporation stop and creating a physical separation between the corporation stop and the service.

81.The applicant shall notify all property owners’ annexed to the City and along streets where a new water main will be constructed to determine if they wish to be connected to City water.

Property owners shall work directly with the applicant regarding costs and location. The applicant shall notify property owners that water connection fees are required if they choose to connect.

82.Prior to recording a final map of any phase, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Fire Chief and City Engineer that there is adequate water pressure to serve the units to be constructed. The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to determine the adequacy of water supply/pressure for the proposed development.

83.Applicant acknowledges that water distribution and treatment capacity for the area within which the proposed subdivision is located is extremely limited, and that distribution may not be available to provide service for the proposed subdivision at such time as applicant is ready to seek approval of a final map. Applicant acknowledges, understands, and agrees that if such water distribution and treatment capacity is not available to serve the proposed subdivision, as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis, the final map may not be approved. Notwithstanding the foregoing, applicant has freely and voluntarily chosen to proceed with the submittal and processing of the tentative map, intends to expend money, time and effort in connection therewith, and accepts the risks that the final map approval may be delayed until sufficient distribution is available as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the City of Clovis. Applicant agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Clovis from any and all claims, costs, expenses, and damages incurred or suffered by applicant, its principals, officers, employees, agents, or contractors, caused by, in connection with, or arising out of the unavailability of water distribution or treatment capacity to serve the proposed subdivision, or the City’s refusal or failure to approve a final map for the proposed subdivision because of the unavailability of water distribution or treatment capacity.
a. The Project requires the improvements indicated below in accordance with the Water Master Plan. The City Engineer shall determine the timing of the improvements in the event they are installed by a City CIP project or development.
b. P-3 (16” Water Main)
1941
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
c. P-4 (12” Water Main)
d. T-6 (3.5 MG Tank)
e. T-9 (7 MG Tank)
Recycled Water

84.The applicant shall install recycled water mains of the sizes and in the locations indicated below. The recycled water improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements. All areas utilizing recycle water for irrigation shall be clearly marked on the improvement plans. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Any alternative routing of the mains shall require approval of the City Engineer and may require appropriate calculations.
a. North Minnewawa Avenue – install 8" main along frontage. b. North Clovis Avenue – install 16” main along the property. c. Paseos, Trails, and Neighborhood Parks – install mains as necessary to serve the paseos, trails, and the neighborhood parks.

Grading and Drainage

85.The applicant shall contact the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) and address all requirements, pay all applicable fees required, obtain any required NPDES permit, and implement Best Available Technology Economically Achievable and Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology to reduce or eliminate storm water pollution.

Plans for these requirements shall be included in the previously required set of construction plans, and shall be submitted to and approved by FMFCD prior to the release of any development permits.

86.Portions of the project appear to lie within a flood zone. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Municipal Code.

87.In the event permanent storm drainage facilities are not available, the applicant shall provide temporary on-site retention basins for storm water disposal and provide a cash deposit for each basin to offset the City’s cost of maintaining the basins. The size and design shall be in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer and may change based on design calculations and access requirements for maintenance. The temporary pond maintenance deposit shall be based on size, depth, expected maintenance schedule, etc. However, the property owner shall be responsible for periodic cleaning of toxic material. The temporary basin is solely for the convenience of the subdivision.

88.The owner of the property on which the temporary basin(s) are located shall backfilled said basin(s) within ninety (90) days after notice is given by the City that the basin(s) are no longer needed. In the event the owner fails to backfill said basin(s) within said 90 days, the 1942
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

City may cause the basin to be backfilled. A lien to cover the cost of the work will be placed on the property, including the costs to prepare and enforce the lien. A covenant shall be prepared and recorded on the lot on which the basin(s) is/are located.

89.Grade differentials between lots and adjacent properties shall be adequately shown on the grading plan and shall be treated in a manner in conformance with City of Clovis Standard Drawing No. M-4 as modified by the City Council. Any retaining walls required on-site or in public right of way shall be masonry construction. All retaining walls shall be designed by a registered civil engineer.

Irrigation and Landscaping Facilities

90.The applicant, as a portion of the required tract improvements, shall provide landscaping and irrigation as required herein. The landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in public right-of-way and the area reserved for landscaping. The irrigation and landscape improvements shall be in accordance with the City’s master plans and shall match existing improvements. The applicant’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Plans for the required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be prepared by an appropriately registered professional at the applicant's expense and shall be approved by the City of Clovis Planning and Development Services Department and Public Utilities Department prior to the beginning of construction or the recording of the final tract map, whichever occurs first. Landscape and irrigation facilities that the City Landscape Maintenance District shall maintain: the mini-park, paseos, paseo lights, interior street lights, entry features, landscape strips along North Minnewawa and North Clovis Avenues, and the median islands in North Clovis Avenue. The landscape strip around the planned unit development may be maintained by a perpetual maintenance covenant.

91.The owner shall request annexation to and provide a covenant for the Landscape Maintenance District. The property owner acknowledges and agrees that such request serves as a petition pursuant to California State Proposition 218 and no further election shall be required for the establishment of the initial assessment. The assessment for each lot shall be obtained from the City for the tax year following the recordation of the final map.

The estimated annual assessment per average sized lot is $540.26, which is subject to change prior to issuance of building permit or final tract map approval and is subject to an annual change in the range of the assessment in the amount of the Consumer Price Index, U.S. City Average, All Urban Consumers (CPI Index), plus two percent (2%). The additional landscaping enhancements that exceed the City norms and are specific benefit to the property, such as the entry feature, columns, monuments, interior median islands, round-abouts, special street lights, etc, if determined to be maintained by the Landscape Maintenance District, shall be maintained by an additional landscape maintenance assessment. The applicant shall provide construction costs and deposit with the City an amount equal to 50% of the value of the enhanced landscaping hardscape features, or an alternate amount approved by the City Engineer, such as columns, monuments, and special street lights, that exceeds the City norms. The applicant shall provide the City with an estimate of the annual maintenance for the special lighting and landscaping enhancements 1943
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
that exceeds the City norms. The owner/developer shall notify all potential lot buyers before they actually purchase a lot that this tract is a part of a Landscape Maintenance District and shall inform potential buyers of the assessment amount. Said notification shall be in a manner approved by the City. The owner/developer shall supply all pertinent materials for the Landscape Maintenance District.

92.The applicant shall comply with the City of Clovis Water Efficient Landscape Requirements Ordinance.

93.The applicant shall contact and address all requirements of the Fresno Irrigation District (FID). This may include dedicating easements, piping or relocating any existing FID canals and ditches, replacing any existing irrigation piping, concrete lining or improving any existing canals, construction or reconstruction of any canals, culverts, and bridge crossings. Plans for these requirements and improvements shall be included as in the previously required set of construction plans, and shall be submitted to and approved by FID prior to the release of any development permits or recording of the final tract map. If a FID or private irrigation line is to be abandoned, the applicant shall provide waivers from all downstream users.

94.The applicant shall indicate on construction drawings the depth, location and type of material of any existing Fresno Irrigation District's irrigation line along the proposed or existing street rights-of-way or onsite. Any existing canals shall be piped. The material of the existing pipe shall be upgraded to the proper class of rubber gasket pipe at all locations unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

95.The applicant shall apply to the Fresno Irrigation District (FID) for transfer of irrigation water rights to the City of Clovis, if the property has not already been removed from FID and transferred to the City. The applicant shall execute a “Request for Change of Relative Value” that can be obtained and processed through FID. The applicant shall provide a copy of the completed form to the City.

96.All existing agricultural irrigation systems either on-site or in public right of way, whether FID or privately owned, shall be identified prior to any construction activity on the site.

Service to all downstream users of irrigation water shall be maintained at all times through preservation of existing facilities or, if the existing facilities are required to be relocated, the relocation and replacement of the existing facilities. It is the intent that downstream users not bear any burden as a result of development of the site. Therefore, the applicant shall pay all costs related to modification, relocation, or repair of any existing irrigation facilities resulting from or necessitated by the development of the site. The applicant shall identify on site plans and construction plans, all existing irrigation systems and their disposition (abandonment, repair, relocation, and/or piping). The applicant shall consult with the Fresno Irrigation District for any additional requirements for lines to be abandoned, relocated, or piped. The applicant shall provide waivers from all users in order to abandon or modify any irrigation pipelines or for any service interruptions resulting from development activities.

1944
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

97.The applicant shall provide a landscape and irrigation perpetual maintenance covenant recorded for landscaping installed in the public right-of-way behind the curb including easements that will not be maintained by the Clovis Landscape Maintenance District. A recordable covenant shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Clovis City Engineer prior to final map approval.

98.The applicant shall provide a perimeter wall perpetual maintenance covenant on all properties that have a perimeter wall that is installed on private property. A recordable covenant shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Clovis City Engineer prior to final map approval.

Miscellaneous

99.The applicant shall install street lights. Street lights along the major streets shall be installed on metal poles to local utility provider’s standards at the locations designated by the City Engineer. Street light locations shall be shown on the utility plans submitted with the final map for approval. Street lights at future traffic signal locations shall be installed on approved traffic signal poles, including all conduits and pull boxes. Street lights along the major streets shall be owned and maintained by local utility providers. Proof of local utility provider’s approval shall be provided. The applicant may install thematic lighting, as approved by the City Engineer. If the applicant chooses to install thematic lighting, the applicant shall provide a conceptual lighting plan identifying adjacent properties that may be incorporated with thematic lights to create a neighborhood effect. Thematic lighting owned by the City shall be maintained by an additional landscape maintenance assessment.
100. The applicant shall install all major street monumentation and section corner monumentation within the limits of the project work in accordance with City Standard ST32 prior to final acceptance of the project. Monumentation shall include all section corners, all street centerline intersection points, angle points and beginning and end of curves (E.C.'s & B.C.'s). The applicant/contractor shall furnish brass caps. Any existing section corner or property corner monuments damaged by this development shall be reset to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A licensed land surveyor or civil engineer licensed to perform land surveying shall certify the placement of all required monumentation prior to final acceptance. Brass caps required for installation of new monuments or replacement of existing monuments shall be provided by the contractor/the applicant and approved by City prior to installation. Within five days after the final setting of all monuments has been completed, the engineer or surveyor shall give written notice to the City Engineer that the final monuments have been set. Upon payment to the engineer or surveyor for setting the final monuments, the applicant shall present to the City Engineer evidence of the payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor.
101. A deferment, modification, or waiver of any engineering conditions shall require the express written approval of the City Engineer.
1945
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
102. The conditions given herein are for the entire development. Additional requirements for individual phases may be necessary pending review by the City Engineer.

Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) Comments (Amjad M. Qader, FMFCD Representative – 559-456-3292)
103. The applicant shall refer to the attached FMFCD correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the FMFCD for the requirements.

Fresno Irrigation District (FID) Comments
(Jeremy Landrith, Department Representative – 559-233-7161 ext. 7407) 104. The applicant shall refer to the attached FID correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the FID for the list of requirements.

County of Fresno Health Department Comments
(Kevin Tsuda, County of Fresno Health Department Representative – 559-600-3271) 105. The applicant shall refer to the attached Fresno County Health Department correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the Health Department for the list of requirements.

California Department of Transportation
(Kaylie Schreihans, Caltrans Representative – 559-383-5944) 106. The applicant shall refer to the attached Caltrans correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the Caltrans for the list of requirements.

County of Fresno Dept. of Public Works and Planning
(David Randall, Department Representative – 559-600-4052) 107. The applicant shall refer to the attached County of Fresno correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the County of Fresno for the list of requirements.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) (Ryan Grossman, District Representative – 559-230-6569) 108. The applicant shall refer to the attached SJVAPCD correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the SJVSPCD for the list of requirements.

Clovis Unified School District
(Andrew Nabors, CUSD Representative – 559-327-9264)
109. The applicant shall refer to the attached CUSD correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the CUSD for the list of requirements. 1946
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Department of Fish and Wildlife
(Kelley Nelson, CDFW Representative – 559-580-3194)
110. The applicant shall refer to the attached CDFW correspondence. If the list is not attached, please contact the DTSC for the list of requirements. 1947
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Attachment 4
RESOLUTION 24-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS APPROVING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2024-001 FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6375 LOCATED EAST OF NORTH MINNEWAWA AVENUE BETWEEN EAST PERRIN

AND EAST SHEPHERD AVENUES
WHEREAS, Lennar Homes of California, LLC (“Applicant”), 8080 N. Palm Avenue Suite 110, Fresno, CA 93711, submitted an application for Planned Development Permit (“PDP”) 2024-001 (“PDP2024-001”) to deviate from the R-1 Zone District development standards associated with Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6375 (“TM6375”) for a 385-lot single-family subdivision (“Project”) on approximately 58.9 acres of property located east of North Minnewawa Avenue between East Perrin and East Shepherd Avenues (“Property”); and WHEREAS, PDP2024-001 is in keeping with the intent and purpose of Chapter 66 of Title 9 of the Clovis Municipal Code (Development Code); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered PDP2024-001 on November 21, 2024, at which time the Commission adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve said PDP; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission’s recommendations were forwarded to the City Council for consideration; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed hearing was held on December 16, 2024, at which time the City Council considered PDP2024-001; and
WHEREAS, the City published notice of the public hearing in the Fresno Business Journal on December 2, 2024, mailed public notices to property owners within 600 feet of the Property, ten (10) days prior to said City Council hearing, and otherwise posted notice of the Public Hearing according to applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has given careful consideration to this PDP on December 16, 2024, and considered the considered the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) analysis outlined in the staff report and elsewhere in the Administrative Record which determines that PDP2024-001 meets the requirements pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and recommends that the City Council adopt of an environmental finding of a mitigated negative declaration and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the entire Administrative Record relating to the Project, which is on file with the Department, and reviewed and considered those portions of the Administrative Record determined to be necessary to make an informed decision, including, but not necessarily limited to, the staff report, the written materials submitted with the request, and the verbal and written testimony and other evidence presented during the public hearing, and the conditions of approval attached as Attachment A to this Resolution, which are incorporated herein by this reference. 1948
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ENTIRE RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AND FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council hereby approves PDP2024-001, subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Attachment A of this Resolution.

2. The Project satisfies the required findings for approval of a planned development permit, as follows:
a. The Project is allowed within the subject base zoning district; b. The Project is consistent with the purpose, intent, goals, policies, actions, and land use designations of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; c. The Project is generally in compliance with all of the applicable provisions of this Development Code relating to both on- and off-site improvements that are necessary to accommodate flexibility in site planning and property development and to carry out the purpose, intent, and requirements of this chapter and the subject base zoning district, including prescribed development standards and applicable design guidelines; d. The Project ensures compatibility of property uses within the zoning district and general neighborhood of the proposed development;
e. The Project would produce a comprehensive development of superior quality (e.g., appropriate variety of structure placement and orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high quality architectural design, increased amounts of landscaping and open space, improved solutions to the design and placement of parking facilities, incorporation of a program of enhanced amenities, etc.) than which might otherwise occur from more
traditional development applications;
f. Proper standards and conditions have been imposed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare;
g. Proper on-site traffic circulation and control is designed into the development to ensure protection for fire suppression and police surveillance equal to or better than what would normally be created by compliance with the minimum setback and parcel width standards identified in Division 2 of this title (Zoning Districts, Allowable Land Uses, and Zone-Specific Standards);
h. The subject parcel is adequate in terms of size, shape, topography, and circumstances to accommodate the proposed development; and i. The design, location, operating characteristics, and size of the proposed development would be compatible with the existing and future land 1949
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.
uses in the vicinity, in terms of aesthetic values, character, scale, and view protection.

3. The City Council has adopted the mitigated negative declaration mitigation and monitoring and reporting program for the TM6375 Project.

4. Without the conditions of approval (Attachment A of this resolution), the City Council could not make the findings necessary for approval of PDP2024-001.

5. The basis for the findings is detailed in the December 16, 2024, staff report, which is hereby incorporated by reference, the entire Administrative Record, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the public hearing. * * * * *
The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on December 16, 2024, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:
______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk
1950
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Attachment A
Conditions of Approval – PDP2024-001
Planning Division Comments
(Liz Salazar, Assistant Planner – 559-324-2305)

1. The Project must produce a comprehensive development of superior quality than which might otherwise occur from more traditional development on the site. This will be reviewed and approved through the civil plan review process and residential site plan review.

2. Three (3) pocket parks totaling approximately 56,400 square feet with associated amenities shall be constructed as the private amenity.

3. As a public amenity for the Project, the developer shall contribute the dollar amount totaling $95,450 to the City for utilization in existing or future open space and/or park improvements.

4. The developer shall construct a minimum six-foot high solid split face masonry wall along the limits of TM6375 adjacent to N. Minnewawa and Clovis Avenue.

5. The developer shall screen all ground mounted mechanical equipment from public view from abutting public streets and rights-of-way and open space uses. Screening material shall be constructed of materials consistent with the superior quality of the PDP and Heritage Grove Design Guidelines.

6. Lots with front facing elevations along N. Minnewawa Avenue shall adhere to front yard fencing standards. Fencing shall be limited to three (3) feet in height for material limiting 50% or more of visibility and seven (7) feet in height for material providing 50% or more of visibility. Fencing material shall be consistent with Heritage Grove Design Guidelines. Chain link is not permitted.

7. Landscape features and forms within amenity areas shall be consistent with Heritage Grove Design Guidelines. Details shall be provided in the construction plan.

8. No more than two (2) of the same unit type (floor layout and exterior materials package) shall be repeated side by side. When two (2) of the same units are repeated side by side, they shall be different colors. These identical provisions may be waived by the City Planner on a specific lot basis within the project when the size or configuration of a lot would otherwise prevent compliance with the above requirements of any other siting or setback/yard requirements established under this application. If such a waiver is requested, the developer and City Planner shall work together to ensure that any sitings of units not in compliance with the above requirements shall be of different materials and elevations in order to minimize any adverse visual impacts that may result.

9. Setbacks shall be measured to the exterior face of the framing of the structure. Exceptions to the setbacks are identified in § 9.24.100, of the Clovis Municipal Code.

10.Development standards for the lots of TM6375 shall be as follows:
1951
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Standard
Housing Products
Wilde
(188 units)
Treasures
(90 units)
Core
(107 units)
Minimum Lot Size (Square Feet) 2,112 4,230 4,230
Minimum Parcel Width 39’ 45’ 45’
Minimum Corner Parcel Width N/A 50’ 50’
Minimum Reverse Parcel Width N/A 55’ 55’
Minimum Parcel Depth 53’ 94’ 94’
Maximum Lot Coverage 62% 52% 45%
Maximum Height 26’ 7” 18’ 11” 25’ 3”
Front (Garage side) Setback 4’ 20’ 20’
Front (Living side) Setback 10’ 12’ 12’
Interior Side Setback
0’ non-patio
side 7’ patio
side
5’
5’
Street Side Setbacks 3’ 10’ 10’
Rear Setback 10’ 10’ 20’
Garages
20’x20’ interior
dimension (2-
car)
20’x20’
interior
dimension
(2-car)
20’x20’
interior
dimension
(2-car)

11.All lighting shall be screened from direct view from the public right-of-way and adjacent residential properties.

12.The developer shall utilize streetlights along local and private streets within the development area that are of the same design and luminosity as surrounding developments within Heritage Grove.

13.A residential site plan review is required to memorialize building plans and elevations for the different product types of TM6375. Specific color and materials of the models, walls, amenities, landscaping, and fencing will be evaluated through the civil plans. 1952
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Attachment 5
RESOLUTION 24-__

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLOVIS MAKING

APPLICATION TO THE FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION AND REQUESTING THE COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE SHEPHERDMINNEWAWA NORTHEAST REORGANIZATION WHEREAS, the City of Clovis desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the CorteseKnox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for the reorganization; and WHEREAS, the specific changes of organization requested are annexation to the City of Clovis and detachment from the Fresno County Fire Protection District; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be reorganized is inhabited, and on this day contains 18 voters, according to information received from the County Election Officer; and WHEREAS, a description of the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Attachment A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the proposal complies with the terms and standards of the tax sharing agreement between the City of Clovis and the County of Fresno; and WHEREAS, on December 16, 2024, the City Council adopted the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) analysis adopting the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the annexation and development project of the property, which is the subject of the Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization; and
WHEREAS, it is desired to provide that the proposed Shepherd-Minnewawa Northeast Reorganization be subject to the following terms and conditions:

1. The regular assessment roll shall be utilized.

2. Each new development will be required to demonstrate adequate water availability and, if necessary, will be required to drill and test a well, and to connect it to the city water system.

3. Each new development will be required to obtain sewage capacity from the trunk sewer specified by the City Engineer.

4. The provisions of Article II, Annexation by City, as agreed between the City of Clovis and the County of Fresno pursuant to the June 6, 2017, Memorandum of Understanding, as amended from time to time, regarding tax sharing shall apply.
1953
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

5. The applicants shall reimburse the City for any expense associated with the transition agreement for fire services with the Fresno County Fire Protection District that would apply to this proposal.

6. A "Right-to-Farm" covenant shall be recorded for each tract map or made a condition of each tract map.

7. Pursuant to Government Code Section 56663, the City shall consent to the annexation and waive its rights to a hearing.

8. Prior to approval, recordation or filing of an annexation, tentative map, final map, parcel map, or site plan (Project), the property covered by the Project shall be included within or annexed to a Community Facilities District (CFD), established by the City for the provision of public facilities and services, for which proceedings have been consummated, and shall be subject to the special tax approved with the formation or annexation to the CFD.

The applicant and the property owner acknowledge and agree that if the Project was not part of a CFD, the City might lack the financial resources to operate facilities and provide public services, such as police protection, fire protection, emergency medical services, parks and recreation services, street maintenance, and public transit. Absent the requirement for inclusion of the Project within a CFD, the City might not be able to make the finding that the Project is consistent with the General Plan and relevant specific plans, and might not be able to make the findings supporting approval of the Project as required by the Subdivision Map Act and the California Environmental Quality Act, and the City might be required to deny the application for the Project.

The owner/developer shall notify all potential lot buyers prior to sale that this Project is a part of a Community Facilities District and shall inform potential buyers of the special tax amount. Said notification shall be in a manner approved by the City.

This requirement may be waived in the discretion of the City Council if, at the time of the approval, recordation, or filing of the Project, the City Council has determined that it is not necessary that the Project be included in the CFD.

WHEREAS, the terms and conditions above are the sole responsibility of the City of Clovis to monitor and enforce. The Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission will not be required to enforce the aforesaid terms and conditions as a responsible agency; and WHEREAS, the reason for this proposed reorganization is to provide municipal services, local controls, and logical growth to the unincorporated area of the County that is remote from County services and undergoing urban development; and WHEREAS, this annexation proposal is consistent with the proposed City of Clovis’ general plan land use diagram designations; and
1954
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and approved the master service plan for the subject change of organization; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AND FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The annexation of property within the boundaries set forth in Attachment A is in compliance with the Standards of Annexation as identified in the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Clovis and the County of Fresno, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Sharing Agreement.

2. This Resolution of Application is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Clovis, and the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby requested to take proceedings for the reorganization of the territory as described in Attachment A, according to the terms and conditions stated above and in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
* * * * *
The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Clovis held on December 16, 2024, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:
______________________________ ______________________________ Mayor City Clerk
1955
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

Attachment A

CITY OF CLOVIS ANNEXATION

AREA TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF CLOVIS GEOGRAPHIC

DESCRIPTION
Being a portion of the West Half of Section 20 together with a portion of the East 30 feet of Section 19 and the South 40 feet of Section 17, Township 12 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base & Meridian, according to the Official United States Government Township Plat thereof, in the County of Fresno, State of California, described as follows:

BEGINNING at the Southeast Corner of said Section 19 and running along the South and West right-of-way line of Minnewawa Avenue according to the Grant Deed thereof recorded in Book 6706 at Page 288, Official Record Fresno County, the following 2 courses:

1. South 89°21'21” West, 30.00 feet along the South line of said Section 19 to the West right-of-way line of Minnewawa Avenue; thence

2. North 1°06'32” West, 5296.80 feet along the West right-of-way line of Minnewawa Avenue to the North line of said Section 19; thence Along the West, North, and East right-of-way lines of Behymer Avenue according to the map thereof recorded in Book 2 of Record of Surveys at Page 46, Fresno County Records, the following 2 courses:

3. North 1°06’32” West, 20.00 feet to the North right-of-way line of Behymer Avenue; thence

4. North 89°22’30” East, 1584.19 feet along the North right-of-way line of Behymer Avenue; thence
Leaving the right-of-way of Behymer Avenue, parallel with and 20.00 feet North of the North line of said Northwest quarter, continuing along the Easterly lines of Parcel 1 as well as the Easterly lines of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 2170 according to the map thereof recorded in Volume 13 of Parcel Maps at Page 35, Fresno County Records, also being the centerline of Enterprise Canal for the following 6 courses:

5. South 14°39’10” East, 679.67 feet along said Enterprise Canal; thence

6. South 26°57’27” East, 37.00 feet continuing along said Enterprise Canal; thence

7. South 48°08’27” East, 149.44 feet; thence

8. South 0°13’46” East, 294.28 feet; thence

9. South 24°09’58” East, 170.98 feet; thence

10. South 5°53’29” East, 99.75 feet; thence
Leaving the centerline of Enterprise Canal and running along the North line of Adjusted Parcel B of Lot Line Adjustment No. 21-06 as described in Grant Deed recorded on September 8, 2021 as Document No. 2021-0146955, Official Records Fresno County; along the East and South lines of said Adjusted Parcel B, being the following 15 courses:

11. North 89°22’23” East, 61.02 feet; thence

12. South 0°59’37” East, 72.67 feet to a tangent curve concave to the Northwest; thence
1956
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16.

13. 101.97 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 26°33'24" having a radius of 220.00 feet; thence

14. South 25°33’46” West, 342.65 feet to a tangent curve concave to the Southeast; thence

15. 129.78 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 26°33'24" having a radius of 280.00 feet; thence

16. South 0°59’37” East, 492.40 feet; thence

17. South 5°41’23” East, 180.24 feet; thence

18. South 5°16’32” East, 241.23 feet; thence

19. South 17°21’08” East, 355.48 feet to a tangent curve concave to the Northeast; thence

20. 226.11 feet along said curve, through a central angle of 74°01'42" having a radius of 175.00 feet; thence

21. North 88°37’10” East, 159.93 feet; thence

22. North 83°58’08” East, 159.90 feet; thence

23. North 78°57’55” East, 272.20 feet to the East line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 20; thence

24. South 0°56’40” East, 70.49 feet along said East line; thence

25. South 89°22’03” West, 1324.97 feet along said North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence
Along the East and South line of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 20 according to the map of Tract Map No. 6050 thereof recorded in Volume 90 of Plats at