Clovis City Council
December 16, 2024

2 The following comments pertain to the demolition of any existing structure(s):
 Should the structure(s) have an active rodent or insect infestation, the infestation should be abated prior to demolition of the structure(s) in order to prevent the spread of vectors to adjacent properties.
 In the process of demolishing the existing structure(s), the contractor may encounter asbestos containing construction materials and materials coated with lead-based paints.  If asbestos containing materials are encountered, contact the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District at (559) 230-6000 for more information.  If the structure(s) were constructed prior to 1979 or if lead-based paint is suspected to have been used in these structures, then prior to demolition work the contractor should contact the following agencies for current regulations and requirements:
 California Department of Public Health, Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch, at (510) 620-5600.
 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, at (415) 947-8000.  State of California, Industrial Relations Department, Division of Occupational Safety and Health, Consultation Service (CAL-OSHA) at (559) 454-5302.

REVIEWED BY:

Kevin Tsuda, R.E.H.S.

Environmental Health Specialist II (559) 600-33271
KT
cc: Deep Sidhu- Environmental Health Division (CT. 55.25) Brandon De Young- Applicant ([email protected]) 188
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
1 Joyce Roach
From: Schreihans, Kaylie@DOT <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 11:23 AM
To: Marissa Jensen
Cc: Joyce Roach; Padilla, Dave@DOT
Subject: [External] Comments TM6482, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, and RO311 TIA Good aŌernoon,
Thank you for the opportunity to review TM6482, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, and RO311 and the associated TIA. We concur with the esƟmated trip generaƟon and VMT analysis. Due to the trip distribuƟon provided in the TIA and the distance of the project to the nearby State Routes, it is projected that the proposed project will have a minimal impact on the State Highway System.

Future expansion phases of the project should be sent to Caltrans for review.

Thank you,

Kaylie Schreihans
Transportation Planner
California Department of Transportation
Office of Regional and Community Planning,
Local Development Review
Caltrans District 6
Phone: (559) 383-5944
1352 W. Olive Avenue
Fresno, CA 93778-2616
189
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
190
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
191
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
192
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
193
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
194
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
195
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
196
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

October 11, 2024
Marissa Jensen
City of Clovis
Planning and Development Services
1033 Fifth St
Clovis, CA 93612
Project: TM6482, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, RO311 – De Young Properties District CEQA Reference No: 20241042
Dear Ms. Jensen,
The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the Planning Application Request (PA) from the City of Clovis (City) for the projects mentioned above. Per the PA, the project consists of a 266-lot single-family residential development (Project). The Project is located on the SEC of N. Peach and E. Behymer Avenue, in Clovis, CA.

The District offers the following comments at this time regarding the Project:

Project Related Emissions
At the federal level under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), the District is designated as extreme nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone standards and serious nonattainment for the particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size (PM2.5) standards. At the state level under California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), the District is designated as nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 standards.

The District’s initial review of the Project concludes that emissions resulting from construction and/or operation of the Project may exceed any of the following significance thresholds as identified in the District’s Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts: https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/g4nl3p0g/gamaqi.pdf.

The District recommends that a more detailed preliminary review of the Project be conducted for the Project’s construction and operational emissions. 197
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 2 of 9 District Reference No: 20241042
October 11, 2024
Construction Emissions
The District recommends, to reduce impacts from construction-related diesel exhaust emissions, the Project should utilize the cleanest available off-road construction equipment.

Operational Emissions
Operational (ongoing) air emissions from mobile sources and stationary sources should be analyzed separately. For reference, the District’s significance thresholds are identified in the District’s Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/g4nl3p0g/gamaqi.pdf.

Recommended Mitigation Measure: At a minimum, project related impacts on air quality should be reduced to levels below the District’s significance thresholds through incorporation of design elements such as the use of cleaner Heavy Heavy-Duty (HHD) trucks and vehicles, measures that reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMTs), and measures that increase energy efficiency. More information on transportation mitigation measures can be found at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/ob0pweru/clean-air-measures.pdf Health Risk Screening/Assessment
The City should evaluate the risk associated with the Project for sensitive receptors (residences, businesses, hospitals, day-care facilities, health care facilities, etc.) in the area and mitigate any potentially significant risk to help limit exposure of sensitive receptors to emissions.

To determine potential health impacts on surrounding receptors (residences, businesses, hospitals, day-care facilities, health care facilities, etc.) a Prioritization and/or a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should be performed for the Project. These health risk determinations should quantify and characterize potential Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) identified by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment/California Air Resources Board (OEHHA/CARB) that pose a present or potential hazard to human health.

Health risk analyses should include all potential air emissions from the project, which include emissions from construction of the project, including multi-year construction, as well as ongoing operational activities of the project. Note, two common sources of TACs can be attributed to diesel exhaust emitted from heavy-duty off-road earth moving equipment during construction, and from ongoing operation of heavy-duty on-road trucks.
198
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 3 of 9 District Reference No: 20241042
October 11, 2024
Prioritization (Screening Health Risk Assessment):

A “Prioritization” is the recommended method for a conservative screening-level health risk assessment. The Prioritization should be performed using the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s (CAPCOA) methodology. Please contact the District for assistance with performing a Prioritization analysis.

The District recommends that a more refined analysis, in the form of an HRA, be performed for any project resulting in a Prioritization score of 10 or greater. This is because the prioritization results are a conservative health risk representation, while the detailed HRA provides a more accurate health risk evaluation.

Health Risk Assessment:

Prior to performing an HRA, it is strongly recommended that land use agencies/ project proponents develop and submit for District review a health risk modeling protocol that outlines the sources and methodologies that will be used to perform the HRA.

A development project would be considered to have a potentially significant health risk if the HRA demonstrates that the health impacts would exceed the District’s established risk thresholds, which can be found here:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/ceqa/.

A project with a significant health risk would trigger all feasible mitigation measures.

The District strongly recommends that development projects that result in a significant health risk not be approved by the land use agency.

The District is available to review HRA protocols and analyses. For HRA submittals please provide the following information electronically to the District for review:
• HRA (AERMOD) modeling files
• HARP2 files
• Summary of emissions source locations, emissions rates, and emission factor calculations and methodologies.

For assistance, please contact the District’s Technical Services Department by:
• E-Mailing inquiries to: [email protected]
• Calling (559) 230-5900
Recommended Measure: Development projects resulting in TAC emissions should be located an adequate distance from residential areas and other sensitive receptors to prevent the creation of a significant health risk in accordance to CARB's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective located at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/resource-center/strategydevelopment/land-use-resources. 199
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 4 of 9 District Reference No: 20241042
October 11, 2024
Ambient Air Quality Analysis
An Ambient Air Quality Analysis (AAQA) uses air dispersion modeling to determine if emissions increases from a project will cause or contribute to a violation of State or National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The District recommends an AAQA be performed for the Project if emissions exceed 100 pounds per day of any pollutant.

An AAQA uses air dispersion modeling to determine if emission increase from a project will cause or contribute to a violation of State or National Ambien Air Quality Standards. An acceptable analysis would include emissions from both projectspecific permitted and non-permitted equipment and activities. The District recommends consultation with District staff to determine the appropriate model and input data to use in the analysis.

Specific information for assessing significance, including screening tools and modeling guidance, is available online at the District’s website:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/ceqa/.

Voluntary Emission Reduction Agreement
Criteria pollutant emissions may result in emissions exceeding the District’s significance thresholds, potentially resulting in a significant impact on air quality.

When a project is expected to have a significant impact, the District recommends the environmental review also include a discussion on the feasibility of implementing a Voluntary Emission Reduction Agreement (VERA) for this Project.

A VERA is a mitigation measure by which the project proponent provides pound-forpound mitigation of emissions increases through a process that develops, funds, and implements emission reduction projects, with the District serving a role of administrator of the emissions reduction projects and verifier of the successful mitigation effort. To implement a VERA, the project proponent and the District enter into a contractual agreement in which the project proponent agrees to mitigate project specific emissions by providing funds for the District’s incentives programs.

The funds are disbursed by the District in the form of grants for projects that achieve emission reductions. Thus, project-related impacts on air quality can be mitigated.

Types of emission reduction projects that have been funded in the past include electrification of stationary internal combustion engines (such as agricultural irrigation pumps), replacing old heavy-duty trucks with new, cleaner, more efficient heavy-duty trucks, and replacement of agricultural equipment with the latest generation technologies.

In implementing a VERA, the District verifies the actual emission reductions that have been achieved as a result of completed grant contracts, monitors the emission reduction projects, and ensures the enforceability of achieved reductions. After the project is mitigated, the District certifies to the Lead Agency that the mitigation is 200
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 5 of 9 District Reference No: 20241042
October 11, 2024
completed, providing the Lead Agency with an enforceable mitigation measure demonstrating that project-related emissions have been mitigated. To assist the Lead Agency and project proponent in ensuring that the environmental document is compliant with CEQA, the District recommends the environmental document includes an assessment of the feasibility of implementing a VERA.

Vegetative Barriers and Urban Greening
There are residential units located near the Project. The District suggests the City consider the feasibility of incorporating vegetative barriers and urban greening as a measure to further reduce air pollution exposure on sensitive receptors (e.g., residential units).

While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, vegetative barriers have been shown to be an additional measure to potentially reduce a population’s exposure to air pollution through the interception of airborne particles and the update of gaseous pollutants. Examples of vegetative barriers include, but are not limited to the following: trees, bushes, shrubs, or a mix of these. Generally, a higher and thicker vegetative barrier with full coverage will result in greater reductions in downwind pollutant concentrations. In the same manner, urban greening is also a way to help improve air quality and public health in addition to enhancing the overall beautification of a community with drought tolerant, low-maintenance greenery.

Clean Lawn and Garden Equipment in the Community
Since the Project consists of residential development, gas-powered residential lawn and garden equipment have the potential to result in an increase of NOx and PM2.5 emissions. Utilizing electric lawn care equipment can provide residents with immediate economic, environmental, and health benefits. The District recommends the Project proponent consider the District’s Clean Green Yard Machines (CGYM) program which provides incentive funding for replacement of existing gas powered lawn and garden equipment. More information on the District CGYM program and funding can be found at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/grants/clean-green-yardmachines-residential/ On-Site Solar Deployment
It is the policy of the State of California that renewable energy resources and zerocarbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers by December 31, 2045. While various emission control techniques and programs exist to reduce air quality emissions from mobile and stationary sources, the production of solar energy is contributing to improving air quality and public health. The District suggests that the City consider incorporating solar power systems as an emission reduction strategy for the Project. 201
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 6 of 9 District Reference No: 20241042
October 11, 2024
District Rules and Regulations
The District issues permits for many types of air pollution sources, and regulates some activities that do not require permits. A project subject to District rules and regulations would reduce its impacts on air quality through compliance with the District’s regulatory framework. In general, a regulation is a collection of individual rules, each of which deals with a specific topic. As an example, Regulation II (Permits) includes District Rule 2010 (Permits Required), Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review), Rule 2520 (Federally Mandated Operating Permits), and several other rules pertaining to District permitting requirements and processes.

The list of rules below is neither exhaustive nor exclusive. Current District rules can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/rules-and-planning/current-district-rulesand-regulations. To identify other District rules or regulations that apply to future projects, or to obtain information about District permit requirements, the project proponents are strongly encouraged to contact the District’s Small Business Assistance (SBA) Office at (559) 230-5888.

District Rules 2010 and 2201 - Air Quality Permitting for Stationary Sources
Stationary Source emissions include any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit any affected pollutant directly or as a fugitive emission. District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) requires operators of emission sources to obtain an Authority to Construct (ATC) and Permit to Operate (PTO) from the District. District Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) requires that new and modified stationary sources of emissions mitigate their emissions using Best Available Control Technology (BACT).

This Project may be subject to District Rule 2010 (Permits Required) and Rule 2201 (New and Modified Stationary Source Review) and may require District permits. Prior to construction, the Project proponent should submit to the District an application for an ATC. For further information or assistance, the project proponent may contact the District’s SBA Office at (559) 230-5888.

District Rule 9510 - Indirect Source Review (ISR)
The Project is subject to District Rule 9510 because it will receive a projectlevel discretionary approval from a public agency and will equal or exceed 50 residential units.

The purpose of District Rule 9510 is to reduce the growth in both NOx and PM emissions associated with development and transportation projects from mobile 202
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 7 of 9 District Reference No: 20241042
October 11, 2024
and area sources; specifically, the emissions associated with the construction and subsequent operation of development projects. The ISR Rule requires developers to mitigate their NOx and PM emissions by incorporating clean air design elements into their projects. Should the proposed development project clean air design elements be insufficient to meet the required emission reductions, developers must pay a fee that ultimately funds incentive projects to achieve off-site emissions reductions.

Per Section 5.0 of the ISR Rule, an Air Impact Assessment (AIA) application is required to be submitted no later than applying for project-level approval from a public agency. As of the date of this letter, the District has not received an AIA application for this Project. Please inform the project proponent to immediately submit an AIA application to the District to comply with District Rule 9510 so that proper mitigation and clean air design under ISR can be incorporated into the Project’s design. One AIA application should be submitted for the entire Project.

Information about how to comply with District Rule 9510 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/indirect-source-review-rule-overview The AIA application form can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/permitting/indirect-source-review-rule-overview/formsand-applications/ District staff is available to provide assistance and can be reached by phone at (559) 230-5900 or by email at [email protected].

District Rule 4002 (National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants)
In the event an existing building will be renovated, partially demolished or removed, the Project may be subject to District Rule 4002. This rule requires a thorough inspection for asbestos to be conducted before any regulated facility is demolished or renovated. Information on how to comply with District Rule 4002 can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/compliance/demolitionrenovation/ District Rule 4601 (Architectural Coatings)
The Project may be subject to District Rule 4601 since it is expected to utilize architectural coatings. Architectural coatings are paints, varnishes, sealers, or stains that are applied to structures, portable buildings, pavements or curbs.

The purpose of this rule is to limit VOC emissions from architectural coatings.

In addition, this rule specifies architectural coatings storage, cleanup and labeling requirements. Additional information on how to comply with District 203
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 8 of 9 District Reference No: 20241042
October 11, 2024
Rule 4601 requirements can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/tkgjeusd/rule-4601.pdf
District Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions)
The project proponent may be required to submit a Construction Notification Form or submit and receive approval of a Dust Control Plan prior to commencing any earthmoving activities as described in Regulation VIII, specifically Rule 8021 – Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities.

Should the project result in at least 1-acre in size, the project proponent shall provide written notification to the District at least 48 hours prior to the project proponents intent to commence any earthmoving activities pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). Also, should the project result in the disturbance of 5- acres or more, or will include moving, depositing, or relocating more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of bulk materials, the project proponent shall submit to the District a Dust Control Plan pursuant to District Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and Other Earthmoving Activities). For additional information regarding the written notification or Dust Control Plan requirements, please contact District Compliance staff at (559) 230-5950.

The application for both the Construction Notification and Dust Control Plan can be found online at: https://ww2.valleyair.org/media/fm3jrbsq/dcp-form.docx Information about District Regulation VIII can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/dustcontrol
District Rule 4901 - Wood Burning Fireplaces and Heaters The purpose of this rule is to limit emissions of carbon monoxide and particulate matter from wood burning fireplaces, wood burning heaters, and outdoor wood burning devices. This rule establishes limitations on the installation of new wood burning fireplaces and wood burning heaters.

Specifically, at elevations below 3,000 feet in areas with natural gas service, no person shall install a wood burning fireplace, low mass fireplace, masonry heater, or wood burning heater.

Information about District Rule 4901 can be found online at:
https://ww2.valleyair.org/compliance/residential-wood-smoke-reductionprogram/ 204
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Page 9 of 9 District Reference No: 20241042
October 11, 2024
Other District Rules and Regulations
The Project may also be subject to the following District rules: Rule 4102 (Nuisance) and Rule 4641 (Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations).

District Comment Letter
The District recommends that a copy of the District’s comments be provided to the Project proponent.

If you have any questions or require further information, please contact Ryan Grossman by e-mail at [email protected] or by phone at (559) 230-6569.

Sincerely,
Tom Jordan
Director of Policy and Government Affairs
For: Mark Montelongo
Program Manager
205
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
dtsc.ca.gov

SENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
November 13, 2024
Marissa Jensen
Assistant Planner
City of Clovis
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, CA 93612
[email protected]
RE: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RO311, R2024-006, PDP2024- 002, AND TM6482 DATED NOVEMBER 1, 2024, STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER 2024110044
Dear Marissa Jensen,
The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the RO311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, and TM6482 project (project). The proposed project site is approximately a 37.92-acre property designated for Medium High-Density Residential development in the City of Clovis General Plan.

The applicant is proposing to zone the project site to allow for the development of a planned single-family residential development with unique development standards. The project proposes 266 single-family residences with a ±0.75-acre park, associated landscaping, and utility and pedestrian infrastructure. DTSC recommends and requests consideration of the following comments:

1. When agricultural crops and/or land uses are proposed or rezoned for residential use, a number of contaminants of concern (COCs) can be present.

The Lead Agency shall identify the amounts of Pesticides and Organochlorine Pesticides (OCPs) historically used on the property. If present, OCPs 206
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Marissa Jensen
November 13, 2024

requiring further analysis are dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane, toxaphene, and dieldrin. Additionally, any level of arsenic present would require further analysis and sampling and must meet HHRA NOTE NUMBER 3, DTSC-SLs approved thresholds. If they are not, remedial action must take place to mitigate them below those thresholds.

Additional COCs may be found in mixing/loading/storage areas, drainage ditches, farmhouses, or any other outbuildings and should be sampled and analyzed. If smudge pots had been routinely utilized, additional sampling for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and/or Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons may be required.

2. DTSC recommends that all imported soil and fill material should be tested to assess any contaminants of concern meet screening levels as outlined in DTSC's Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) Guidance Manual.

Additionally, DTSC advises referencing the DTSC Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material Fact Sheet if importing fill is necessary. To minimize the possibility of introducing contaminated soil and fill material there should be documentation of the origins of the soil or fill material and, if applicable, sampling be conducted to ensure that the imported soil and fill material are suitable for the intended land use. The soil sampling should include analysis based on the source of the fill and knowledge of the prior land use. Additional information can be found by visiting DTSC’s Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) webpage.

DTSC appreciates the opportunity to comment on the MND for the RO311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, and TM6482 project. Thank you for your assistance in protecting California’s people and environment from the harmful effects of toxic substances. If you have any questions or would like clarification on DTSC’s comments, please respond to this letter or via email for additional guidance.
207
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Marissa Jensen
November 13, 2024

Sincerely,
Tamara Purvis
Associate Environmental Planner
HWMP - Permitting Division – CEQA Unit
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]
cc: (via email)
Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation
State Clearinghouse
[email protected]
Dave Kereazis
Associate Environmental Planner
HWMP-Permitting Division – CEQA Unit
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]
Scott Wiley
Associate Governmental Program Analyst
HWMP - Permitting Division – CEQA Unit
Department of Toxic Substances Control
[email protected]
208
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, POP2024-002, ANDTM6482
INFTIAL Study
City of Clovis
DeYoung Properties
R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, and TM6482
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
October 2024
PREPARED BY:

Marlssa Jensen, MA
Assistant Planner
Planning & Development Services
(559) 324-2338
[email protected]
Attachment 1B
I
Attachment 10
209
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
Cmr OF Clovis

INITIAL STUDY
This Initial Study was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq., CEQA Guidelines Title 14, Section 15000 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations.

PROJECT TITLE:

LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS:

CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE
NUMBER:

PROJECT LOCATION:

PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND
ADDRESS:

LAND USE DESIGNATION:

ZONING DESIGNATION:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

SURROUNDING LAND USES AND
SETTING:

REQUIRED APPROVALS:

HAVE CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN
TRIBES REQUESTED CONSULTATION? IF
SO, HAS CONSULTATION BEGUN?
R0311, R2024-006. PDP2024-002, and TM6482
City of Clovis
Planning & Development Services
1033 Fifth Street
Clovis, CA 93612
Marissa Jensen, Assistant Planner
(559) 324-2338
[email protected]
South of E. Behymer Avenue between N. Minnewawa
Avenue and the N. Peach Avenue alignment in Clovis, CA
DeYoung Properties
677 W. Paimdon Drive Suite 208
Fresno, CA 93704
Existing - MH (Medium High Density)
Existing - AE-20 (Fresno County, Exclusive Agricultural) Proposed - R-1-PRD (Single-Family Planned Residential
Development)
See page 7 of this Initial Study
See pages 6 and 7 of this Initial Study
See page 9 of this Initial Study
Tribes did not request consultation.
210
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006. PDP2024-002. AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED 5
B. PROJECT OVERVIEW 6
C. PROJECT LOCATION 6
D. EXISTING SETTING 6

1. Existing Conditions 6

2. Surrounding Conditions 6

3. Land Use Designation

4. Zoning Designation
E. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. Project Entitlements

2. Project Construction and Phasing

3. Site Preparation

4. Project Components
F. REQUIRED PROJECT APPROVALS 9
G. TECHNICAL STUDIES 9
H. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 16

1. Aesthetics 16

2. Agriculture and Forestry Resources 18

3. Air Quality 21

4. Biological Resources 25

5. Cultural Resources 27

6. Energy 30

7. Geology and Soils 31

8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 33

9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 36

10. Hydrology and Water Quality 39

11. Land Use and Planning 43

12. Mineral Resources 44

13. Noise 44

14. Population and Housing 46

15. Public Services 47

16. Recreation 49

17. Transportation 50

18. Tribal Cultural Resources 53

19. Utilities and Service Systems 55

20. Wildfire 57

21. Mandatory Findings of Significance 58
I. REPORT PREPARATION 61
211
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002. ANDTM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: PROJEa Location and Existing Conditions 10
Figure 2: General Plan Land Use Designation 11
Figure 3: Zoning 12
Figure 4: Conceptual Tract Map 13
Figure 5: conceptual park layout 14
Figure 6: Conceptual elevations 15
212
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002. AND TM6482
Initial Study
City OF Clovis
A. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, as indicated by the checklist and corresponding discussion In this Initial Study. □ Aesthetics Agriculture & Forestry Resources □ Air Quality lEI Biological Resources Cultural Resources □ Energy
1^ Geology & Soils IE! Greenhouse Gas Emissions □ Hazards & Hazardous Materials □ Hydrology & Water Quality □ Land Use/Planning □ Mineral Resources Noise □ Population/Housing □ Public Services
□ Recreation lEI Transportation lEI Tribal Cultural Resources □ Utilities & Service Systems □ Wildfire □ Mandatory Findings of Significance Determination
On the basis of this Initial evaluation:
□ I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
^ I find that, although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponents. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
□ I find that the proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environmental, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) will be prepared.
□ I find that the proposed Project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environmental, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed In an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets.

An EIR is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. □ I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately analyzed In an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is required.

Prepared By:
10/30/2024
Marlssa Jensen, MA, Assistant Planner
Planning & Development Services
City of Clovis
Date
Approved By:

V'A^WS 2024.10.31
08:03:33-07'00'
Renee Math Is, Director
Planning & Development Services
City of Clovis
Date
213
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006. PDP2024-002, ANDTM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
B. PROJECT OVERVIEW
Juli Kutka of DeYoung Properties (applicant) proposes to annex (R0311) and Prezone (R2024-006) the subject property from Fresno County's AE-20 (Exclusive Agricultural, 20-acre minimum parcel size) zone district to the R-1-PRD (Single-Family Planned Residential Development) and the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zone districts. The annexation boundary consists of ±37.92 acres, the project site is ±36.92 acres and is located south of E. Behymer Avenue, between N. Minnewawa Avenue and the N. Peach Avenue alignment in the County of Fresno, Califomia. The Project is situated adjacent to agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities. The aforementioned applications will facilitate the development of a 266-lot single-family subdivision. Tract Map 6482 (TM6482), inclusive of a Planned Development Permit (PDP2024-002) for enhanced development. The project will include site improvements (i.e., landscaping, parking, sidewalks, and utility infrastructure). The project shall be referred to throughout the document as "proposed Project" and/or "Project." Details regarding the Project and operations are described more throughout the initial Study, beginning under Section E.

C. PROJECT LOCATION
As shown in Figure 1, the proposed ±37.92-acre annexation boundary is situated south of E. Behymer Avenue between N. Minnewawa Avenue and the N. Peach Avenue alignment. The ±36.92-acre area proposed for development herein referred to as "Project site" encompasses the majority of the annexation area with the exception of a small ±1 acre parcel situated at the southeast corner of the boundary. The proposed development will occupy the entire parcels with Accessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) 556-010-28 and 29. APN 556-010-12 will not be incorporated as part of the proposed development but will be annexed into the City based on the need for a logical boundary per Fresno County and LAFCo's annexation requirements.

The Project is within the City's Heritage Grove planned growth area. Heritage Grove encompasses ±2,560 acres of land bounded by Willow Avenue to the west, Sunnyside Avenue to the east. Copper Avenue to the north and the Shepherd Avenue to the south. This area has been examined programmaticaily in the City's current General Plan EIR. This document evaluates potential environmental impacts in detail.

D. EXISTING SETTING
This section describes the existing conditions, surrounding conditions, as well as the General Plan land use and zoning designations.

1. EXISTING CONDITIONS
As shown in Figure 1 below, the Project site is primarily undeveloped with some orchards, a singlefamily residence, and accessory buildings. The site is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities

2. SURROUNDING CONDITIONS
As referenced below in Table 1, and shown on Figure 1, the Project site situated adjacent to agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities.

Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses
Land Use Designation Existing Zoning* Existing Land Use North Medium High Density Residential AE-20 Rural Residential Properties, Orchards, Undeveloped
East Neighborhood Commercial AE-20 Orchards
South Medium + Medium High Density
Residential
AE-20 Orchards
West High Density Residential R-3 Rural Residential Property, Undeveloped
214
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
I *AE-20 (Exclusive Agricultural, 20-acre parcel minimum). R-3 (Multifamily High Density) I

3. LAND USE DESIGNATION
As shown in Figure 2, the Project site has an existing General Plan Land Use designation of Medium High Density Residential. The Medium High Density Residential designation allows for single-family residential development at a density of 7.1-20.0 dwelling units per acre.

4. ZONING DESIGNATION
As shown in Figure 3, the Project site is currently zoned AE-20 (Exclusive Agricultural, 20-acre minimum parcel size) in the County of Fresno, however, proposes a Prezone to the Clovis R-1-PRD (Single-Family Planned Residential Development) for ±36.92 acres of the annexation area and R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zone Districts for the remaining ±1-acre portion of the Project site. The R-1- PRD and R-1 Zone Districts are consistent with the existing Medium High Density land use designation.

E. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project site is a ±37.92-acre property designated for Medium High-Density Residential development in the City of Clovis General Plan. The applicant is proposing to Prezone the project site to allow for the development of a planned single-family residential development with unique development standards. The Project proposes 266 single-family residences with a ±0.75-acre park, associated landscaping, and utility and pedestrian infrastructure. This section describes the components of the proposed Project in more detail, including site preparations, proposed structures, and on- and off-site improvements.

1. PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS
The Project would include several planning entitlements, including a prezone, vesting tentative tract map, planned development permit, and residential site plan review. The prezone is to bring the zoning into consistency with the proposed general plan land use designation, the tentative tract map is required to subdivide the property in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and City standards, the planned development permit is to evaluate the unique development standards and enhanced development features such as architecture, landscaping, parking and additional amenities, and the residential site plan review is required to memorialize the design and layout of the homes.

2. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION AND PHASING
The Project is anticipated to begin construction in the winter of 2025 with full buildout by winter of 2029.

This schedule is an estimation only and Is contingent upon entitlements, and the market, among other factors.

3. SITE PREPARATION
Site preparation would include the demolition of the existing home, acessory structures, and orchards.

Typical grading activities would occur to ensure an adequately graded site for drainage purposes. Part of the preparation would include the removal of any other vegetation, crops, and trees necessary to accommodate the Project. Other site preparation activities would include minor excavation for the installation of utility infrastructure, for conveyance of water, sewer, stormwater, and irrigation.

4. PROJECT COMPONENTS
This section describes the overall components of the Project, such as the proposed buildings, landscape, vehicle and pedestrian circulation, and utilities. 215
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311. R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
Demolition
The existing residence, fruit orchards, and accessory structures wiii be demolished to accommodate the development of the Project.

Site Layout and Circulation
The Project is proposing 266 lots, ranging from ±2,090 square feet to ±8,434 square feet, with an average of ±3,682 square feet, and a 0.75-acre neighborhood park. The Project is bound by E.

Behymer Avenue to the north, N. Minnewawa Avenue to the east, and the N. Peach Avenue alignment to the west. The applicant will be required to install N. Peach Avenue and upgrade N. Minnewawa and E. Behymer Avenues to City standards. Along with improvements to the surrounding streets, the applicant is also proposing a network of internal public streets. The Project would be accessed via three (3) points of ingress/egress from E. Behymer Avenue and one (1) point of shared ingress/egress from N. Peach Avenue. The installation of pedestrian paths of travel from the N. Peach, E. Behymer, and N.

Minnewawa frontages would be required as part of the Project. Per the Heritage Grove Master Plan, community corner paseos are required at the corners of N. Peach and E. Behymer Avenues and N.

Minnewawa and E. Behymer Avenues.

Parking
The CMC requires that residential planned residential developments provide a minimum of two (2) covered spaces plus one (1) covered or uncovered guest space for each dwelling unit. Each garage would be required to have an interior dimension of 20 feet by 20 feet for two car garages and 10 feet by 20 feet for single-car garages. The applicant is requesting a deviation from the typical parking requirement, by only proposing one (1) covered space and one (1) uncovered space for a portion of the homes. The Planned Development Permit may adjust or modify, where necessary and justifiable, all applicable development standards. The proposed parking deviation will be reviewed thoroughly as part of the Residential Site Plan Review (RSPR) process for compliance.

Landscape
The Project would include landscape throughout the site. Landscaped areas would generally be located along the frontage of major streets, as well as in the front yard areas of each parcel, consistent with the CMC. Landscape plans are typically provided during the City's residential RSPR process at which time the proposed landscape would be reviewed for compliance with the City's water efficient landscape regulations and guidelines. As an amenity to the Project, the applicant is providing a neighborhood park (see Figure 5 for the conceptual design).

Utilities
Utilities for the site would consist of water, sewer, electric, cable, gas, and stormwater infrastructure.

Trenching and digging activities would be required for the installation of necessary pipelines typical of development. All utility plans would be required to be reviewed and approved by the appropriate agency, and/or department to ensure that installation occurs to pertinent codes and regulations. Other infrastructure would include new fire hydrants as required by the City of Clovis Fire Department.

Utilities are provided by and managed from a combination of agencies, including the Fresno Irrigation District (FID), which provides the City's water supply which is then supplied to customers by the City of Clovis, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) which has responsibility for storm water management, and the City's public utilities department which provides for solid waste collection, and sewer collection services. Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) provides electricity and natural gas within the City of Clovis.
216
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
F. REQUIRED PROJECT APPROVALS
The City of Clovis requires the following review, permits, and/or approvals for the proposed Project; however, other approvals not listed below may be required as identified throughout the entitlement process:

Annexation
Rezone (Prezone)
Tentative Tract Map
Planned Development Permit
Residential Site Plan Review
Grading Permit
Building Permit
San Joaquin Air Pollution Control District
Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
G. TECHNICAL STUDIES
The analysis of the Project throughout this Initial Study relied in part on the technical studies listed below prepared for the Project, as well as other sources, including, but not limited to, the 2014 Clovis General Plan EIR, departmental staff, Califomia Department of Conservation, and the California Department of Toxic Control Substances.

Appendix A: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Memorandum dated August 2024 Appendix B: Biological Resources Evaluation dated June 2024 Appendix C: Cultural Resource Assessment dated June 24, 2024 Appendix D: Water Infrastructure Investigation dated May 28, 2024 Appendix E: Transportation Impact Analysis dated October 2024 Appendix F: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis dated August 2024 Appendix G: Califomia Agricultural LESA Worksheets dated May 15, 2024 217
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
Figure 1: Project Location and Existing Conditions
iiiillili
Behymer Avenue
It m
i
lAnnexatbn Boundary (±37.92 acres) I Project Site (±36.92 acres) 10 218
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, and TM6482
iNFTtAL Study
City of Clovis
Figure 2: General Plan Land Use Designations
E Brhmer.Wr
GC3
- _ _ Boindary,
I
I aa » (±37.92 acres) 1
Medium high Oensiiy Residenlia]
(7.1-20.0 du/ac)
Medium DertsiV Residential
(4.1-7.0 du/ac)
Neigh bofhood
Commerdal
■j-'
Trmrmr
O
N
A
11 219
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006. PDP2024-002, ANDTM6482
INFTIAL Study
City ofClovis
Figure 3: Current Zoning
T BujiK "I W'J E BchMurr Ave
cm
r " ""i Annexation Botndary I — — (+37.92 acres) AE-20 (Exclusive Agricultural. 20«cre minimum parcel size) Fresno County Zoning
12 220
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP20244)02, AND TM6482
Initial Study
CityofClovis
Figure 4: Conceptual Tract Map
tASTBHIYMta AVtSVE
K
i
PNMea
13 221
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024.006, PDP2024.002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
CfTY OF Clovis
Figure 5: Conceptual Park Layout

ROUNDABOUT
W/OANTR££
0*>6N PLAY / TURF
OAKTRee

OAK TREES
14 222
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024'002, AND TM6482
iNtTiAL Study
City of Clovis
Figure 6: Conceptual Elevations
I
I 11 ^ ' d '
15 223
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024^06, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
H. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
This section provides an evaiuation of the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project and are based on CEQA Guidelines Appendix G. For each issue area, one of four conclusions is made:
• No Impact: No project-related impact to the environment would occur with project development. • Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not result in a substantial and adverse change in the environment. This impact level does not require mitigation measures. • Less Than Significant with Mitigation incorporated: The proposed project would result in an environmental impact or effect that is potentially significant, but the incorporation of mitigation measure(s) would reduce the project-related impact to a less than significant level. • Potentially Significant impact: The proposed project would result in an environmental impact or effect that is potentially significant, and no mitigation can be identified that would reduce the impact to a less than significant level.

1. AESTHETICS
Except as provided In Public Resources
Code Section 21099, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
incorporated
Less Than
Significant
impact
No
impact
a. Have a substantial effect on a scenic vista? X
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
state scenic highway?
X
c. Substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality of public views of the
site and its surroundings? (Public views are
those that are experienced from publicly
accessible vantage point), if the project is in
an urbanized area, would the project conflict
with applicable zoning and other regulations
governing scenic quality?
X
d. Create a new source of substantial light or
glare that would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
X
Environmental Setting
The City of Clovis is located within the San Joaquin Valley. Thus, much of the City and its surrounding areas are predominately flat. As a result, on clear days, the Sierra Nevada Mountains are visible to the east depending on your location. Aside from Sierra Nevada, there are no officially designated focal points or viewsheds within the City. However, Policy 2.3, Visual Resources, of the Open Space Element of the 2014 Clovis General Plan, requires maintaining public views of open spaces, parks, and natural features and to preserve Clovis' viewshed of the surrounding foothills.

As mentioned above in the Project Description, the site is located south of E. Behymer Avenue between N.

Minnewawa Avenue and the N. Peach Avenue alignment. In general, the Project site will be in the fringes of Clovis following annexation and is situated on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single16 224
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City OF Clovis
family residence, and accessory buildings. The site is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities.

Discussion
a) Would the project have a substantial effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. As mentioned above, there are no officially designated scenic vistas or focal points in the City of Clovis. While the Sierra Nevada Mountains can be viewed on clear days the Project would allow structures to be constructed at a maximum height of 35 feet. The units will be constructed at a typical maximum height for standard single family residential zone districts. Additionally, there are no officially designated scenic vistas in the area, therefore no Impact would occur with regards to the project having a substantial effect on a scenic vista. As a result, no mitigation measures are required. b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? No Impact. As stated in the 2014 Clovis General Plan EIR, there are no Caltrans-designated scenic highways within the City of Clovis.^ Further, there are no existing historical structures or rock outcroppings located on or within the immediate vicinity of the site, therefore, the Project would result in no impact with regards to substantially damaging scenic resources within a State scenic highway. c) Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations goveming scenic quality?
Less-Than-Slgniflcant Impact. As mentioned previously, the existing site is primarily undeveloped with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. The site is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities. The Project is located within the Heritage Grove planned growth area. Although the project is proposing to convert agricultural land to residential uses, this conversion is pursuant to the 2014 General Plan. Upon completion, the project will not be consistent with the existing rural residential properties and orchards that currently exist in the surrounding area; however it will be consistent with future single-family development at Medium and Medium High Densities, per the General Plan designations.

Further, the Project would undergo the RSPR process which would ensure that the overall design and character is consistent and/or complements the surrounding areas. The RSPR process will ensure the Project complies with relevant design policies, such as in the Heritage Grove Master Plan, the CMC, and the General Plan. During the review, the height, color and materials are reviewed for consistency with these plans and guidelines. Consequently, a less-than-slgnificant impact would occur with regards to substantially degrading the existing visual character of the site and its surroundings, and no mitigation measures are required. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project consists of 266 single-family homes. As a result of the existing site being primarily agricultural, the Project would result in new sources of light and glare. Light and glare from 1 2014 Clovis General Plan EIR, June 2014, Page 5.1-1
17 225
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006. PDP2024-002, ANDTM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
the Project would be typical of residential development, including but not limited to, sources such as exterior lighting for safety, light, and glare from vehicles or from light reflecting off surfaces such as windshields. Other sources of light would be the interior lighting of the units at night. These sources of light and glare are not typically associated with causing significant effects on the environment. Further, the site is surrounded by agricultural uses planned for single-family residences that will eventually result in similar sources and intensities of light and glare. Sources of future light and glare are comprised of streetlights, and light and glare from vehicles going to and from home.

Although the Project would introduce new sources of light and glare, the RSPR process would ensure that the design and placement of lighting is appropriate to minimize potential light and glare impacts to surrounding properties. Further, the Project would be required to comply with Section 9.22.050, Exterior Light and Glare, of the CMC, which requires light sources to be shielded and that lighting does not spillover to adjacent properties.

Overall, through the City's design review process and compliance with Section 9.22.050 of the CMC, the Project would result in a less-than-slgnificant impact with regard to lighting adversely affecting day or nighttime views in the area. No mitigation measures are required.

2. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to nonagriculturai use.

X
b. Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
X
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code section 12220
(g)) or timberland (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 4526)?
X
d. Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
X
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest
use?
X
Environmental Setting
The site is located south of E. Behymer Avenue between N. Minnewawa Avenue and the N. Peach Avenue alignment. In general, the Project site will be in the fringes of Clovis following annexation and is situated on a 18 226
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311. R2024-006, PDP2024-002, ANDTM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. The site is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities.

Discussion
a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program ohhe California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. According to the California Important Farmland finder interactive map from the California Department of Conservation ,2 the Project site is considered Prime Farmland (2020 data), which is defined by the Department of Conservation as farmland with the best combination of physical and chemical features able to sustain long term agricultural production. This land has the soil quality, growing season, and moisture supply needed to produce sustained high yields. The Project would develop ±36.92 acres with 266 single-family homes. Therefore, development of the proposed Project would result in the conversion of Prime Farmland to a non-agricultural use.

The City of Clovis 2014 General Plan identifies that the 2035 buildout of the General Plan would result in significant unavoidable impacts related to conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Statewide importance. Thus, the potential impacts associated with the conversion of farmlands as described above were evaluated in conjunction with the General Plan EIR. This initial study relies on the General Plan EIR through the tiering concept (Section 15152 of the CEQA Guidelines) with regard to the analysis of potential farmland conversion impacts associated with the Project. As stated in the General Plan EIR, City policies seek to preserve the agricultural legacy of Clovis by facilitating thoughtful conversion of farmland and supporting "right to farm" and regional conservation efforts. Therefore, with the inclusion of the following Mitigation Measure, impacts in this category will be reduced to a less than significant impact with mitigation.

Mitiaation Measure AGR-1: The Project applicant shall prepare or fund an agricultural resource evaluation prior to project approval. The resource evaluation shall use generally accepted methodologies (such as the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model) to identify the potentially significant impact of the loss of agricultural land. If the loss of agricultural land is determined to be a potentially significant impact, the resource evaluation shall consider the economic viability of future agricultural use of the property. If the agricultural resource is considered significant and future agricultural use is considered economically viable, the conversion will be deemed significant. The City shall require mitigation by one of the following methods; • Mitigation at a 1:1 ration of converted to preserved acreage through a regional conservation easement, or payment of its valuation equivalent if a fee mitigation program is established. If 1:1 mitigation is determined to be economically infeasible, based upon all of the evidence, the ratio may be reduced to an economically feasible ratio or no further mitigation shall be required.

This determination shall be made by the City's Director of Planning and Development Services based upon substantial evidence in the record; or
• Other potential mitigation which achieves the same mitigating effect as the measures identified above, consistent with the CEQA Statutes and Guidelines. This determination shall be made by 2 Farmland Mapping, California Department of Conservation. Interactive mapping tool (https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/).
19 227
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311. R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
INITIAL Study
City OF Clovis
the City's Director of Planning and Development Services based upon substantial evidence in the record.

The Project site is not designated for farming-related activities under the 2014 General Plan as such would be consistent with the planned growth of the Heritage Grove area and as identified in the General Plan EIR the conversion of farmlands of importance cannot be mitigated. Consequently, because the Project would not result in unplanned impacts to important farmland, a less than significant impact with mitigation would occur.
b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? No impact. As shown in Figure 5.2-2 of the Agricultural Resources Chapter of the 2014 Clovis General Plan EIR, the Project site is not under a Williamson Act Contract. Further, the site is not currently zoned or designated for agricultural use. As a result, the Project would have no impact with regards to conflicting with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act Contract. c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g)) or timberland (as deifned in Public Resources Code section 4526)?
No Impact. The Project site does not contain forest land. Further, the site is not zoned for forestry or other forestry related uses. As a result, no impact would occur with regards to conflicts with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land.
d) Would the project result In the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. See discussion under Section 2c.
e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. Although the Project site for development of 266-single family homes contains Prime Farmland according to the Department of Conservation, the site is not designated for agricultural uses, see discussion in Section 2a. The 2014 Clovis General Plan designates the Project site for residential uses. The Project annexation area is located within the Heritage Grove area which is planned to be converted to non-agricultural land pursuant to the 2014 General Plan. However, given that the development within the annexation area would be phased over time, some adjacent agricultural uses would continue to operate until other projects are proposed to be constructed. The City's General Plan contains policies to aid in the preservation of agricultural land, including Policies 2.4 and 2.5 of the General Plan's Open Space and Conservation Element. As such Mitigation Measure AG-2 would be implemented to ensure notification of Right-To Farm to future residents of the Project site, such that residents would be prepared to accept inconveniences and discomfort associated with normal farm activities on parcels adjacent to the Project site. Issuance of Right-to-Farm notifications would prevent agricultural operations from being the subject of nuisance complaints and being forced to cease or curtail operations. The Project site is not designated for forest or timberland. With implementation of Mitigation Measure AG-2, the proposed Project would not result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use, and the impact would be less-thansignificant impact with mitigation.

Mitioation Measure AGR-2: Pursuant to Clovis Municipal Code Section 9.40.170 and the California Civil Code Section 3482.5, prior to approval of building occupancy permits the Project developer shall 20 228
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024^02, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
provide residents of the Project site Right-To-Farm notifications. The Right-To-Farm notification would advise future occupants of the Project site that they are residing adjacent to agricultural land that has been active for three or more years and that they should expect continued activities associated with agricultural production.

3. AIR QUALITY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Conflict with or obstruct irhplementation
of the applicable air quality plan? X
b. Result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant for.
which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
X
c. Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations? X
d. Result in other emissions (such as
those leading to odors) adversely
affecting a substantial number of
people?
X
Environmental Setting
An Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Memorandum (AQ/GHG Memo) was prepared by LSA Associates Inc. (LSA) in August of 2024 (see Appendix A). Information in this AQ/GHG Memo is used for the analysis included in both the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions section of this Initial Study.

San Joaquin Valley Air Basin
The City of Clovis (City) is in the central portion of the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB). SJVAB consists of eight counties: Fresno, Kern (western and central), Kings, Tulare, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, and Stanislaus. The SJVAB is approximately 25,000 square miles. It is bordered by the Sierra Nevada in the east, the Coast Ranges in the west, and the Tehachapi mountains in the south. The valley is topographically flat with a slight downward gradient to the northwest. The valley opens to the sea at the Carquinez Straits where the San Joaquin-Sacramento Delta empties into San Francisco Bay.

Topography
The topography of a region is important for air quality because mountains can block airflow that would help disperse pollutants and can channel air from upwind areas that transports pollutants to downwind areas. The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) covers the entirety of the SJVAB. The SJVAB is generally shaped like a bowl. It Is open in the north and is surrounded by mountain ranges on all other sides.

The Sierra Nevada mountains are along the eastern boundary (8,000 to 14,000 feet in elevation), the Coast Ranges are along the western boundary (3,000 feet in elevation), and the Tehachapi Mountains are along the southern boundary (6,000 to 8,000 feet in elevation).

Climate
The SJVAB is in a Mediterranean climate zone and is influenced by a subtropical high-pressure cell most of the year. Mediterranean climates are characterized by sparse rainfall, which occurs mainly in winter. Summers are hot and dry. Summertime maximum temperatures often exceed 100®F in the valley. 21 229
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006. PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
The subtropical high-pressure cell is strongest during spring, summer, and fall and produces subsiding air, which can result in temperature inversions in the valley. A temperature inversion can act like a lid, inhibiting vertical mixing of the air mass at the surface.

Any emissions of pollutants can be trapped below the inversion. Most of the surrounding mountains are above the normal height of summer inversions (1,500-3,000 feet).

Winter-time high pressure events can often last many weeks, with surface temperatures often lowering into the 30®F. During these events, fog can be present, and inversions are extremely strong. These wintertime inversions can inhibit vertical mixing of pollutants to a few hundred feet.

Ambient Air Quaiity Standards
The Clean Air Act (CAA) was passed in 1963 by the US Congress and has been amended several times. The 1970 CAA amendments strengthened previous legislation and laid the foundation for the regulatory scheme of the 1970s and 1980s. In 1977, Congress again added several provisions, including nonattainment requirements for areas not meeting National Air Quality Standards (AAQS) and the Prevention of Significant Deterioration program. The 1990 amendments represent the latest in a series of federal efforts to regulate the protection of air quality in the United States. The CAA allows states to adopt more stringent standards or to include other pollution species. The California Clean Air Act, signed into law in 1988, requires all areas of the state to achieve and maintain the California AAQS by the earliest practical date. The California AAQS tend to be more restrictive than the National AAQS, based on even greater health and welfare concerns.

These National and California AAQS are the levels of air quality considered to provide a margin of safety in the protection of the public health and welfare. They are designed to protect "sensitive receptors," those most susceptible to further respiratory distress, such as asthmatics, the elderly, very young children, people already weakened by other disease or illness, and persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise. Healthy adults can tolerate occasional exposure to air pollutant concentrations considerably above these minimum standards before adverse effects are observed.

Both California and the federal government have established health based AAQS for six air pollutants. As shown In Table 3, Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants, these pollutants are carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), lead (Pb), and suspended partlculate matter (PM2.5and PM10). In addition, the state has set standards for sulfates and hydrogen sulfide. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety.

In addition to the criteria pollutants, toxic air contaminants (TACs) are another group of pollutants of concem.

TACs are injurious in small quantities and are regulated despite the absence of criteria documents. The identification, regulation and monitoring of TACs is relatively recent compared to that for criteria pollutants.

Unlike criteria pollutants, TACs are regulated based on risk rather than specification of safe levels of contamination.

Attainment Status
The air quality management plans prepared by SJVAPCD provide the framework for SJVAB to achieve attainment of the state and federal AAQS through the State Implementation Plan. Areas are classified as attainment or nonattainment areas for pollutants, depending on whether they meet the ambient air quality standards. Nonattainment areas are imposed with additional restrictions as required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. There are different classifications for attainment and the severity classifications for ozone nonattainment range in magnitude from marginal, moderate, and serious to severe and extreme. These classifications are used as a foundation to create air quality management strategies to improve air quality and comply with the National AAQS.
22 230
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
Table 2: Air Quality Attainment Status for Fresno County Discussion
Pollutant State Federal
Ozone (1-hour) Sever/Nonattainment Not Applicable
Ozone (8-hour) Nonattainment Extreme Nonattainment
PM10 Nonattainment Attainment (Maintenance)
PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment
Carbon Monoxide Attainment Attainment (Maintenance)
Nitrogen Dioxide Attainment Unclassified/Attainment
Lead Attainment Unclassified/Attainment
Sulfur Dioxide Attainment Unclassified
Sulfates Attainment No Federal Regulation
Hydrogen Sulfide Unclassified No Federal Regulation
a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicabie air quality pian? Less-Than-Significant Impact With Mitigation. In general, regional air quality impacts and attainment of standards are the result of the cumulative impacts of all emission sources within the air basin. Thus, individual projects are generally not large enough to contribute measurably to an existing violation or air quality standards alone. Although the CEQA Guidelines indicate that a significant impact would occur if the Project were to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan, the SJVAPCDs 2015 Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI) does not provide specific guidance on analyzing conformity with the plan. Thus, for purposes of analyzing this potential impact, the AQ/GHG Report considered impacts based on: (1) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicabie air quality plan; (2) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase if any criteria pollutant for which the project region nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard: (3) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; and (4) Result in other emissions such as those lead to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people.® The San Joaquin Valley Air Board (SJVAB) is designated as non-attainment for O3 and PM2.5 for federal standards and non-attainment for O3, PM10, and PM2.5 for State standards. Construction of the proposed project would not result in the generation of criteria air pollutants that would exceed SJVAPCD thresholds of significance. In addition to the construction period thresholds of significance, the SJVAPCD has implemented Regulation VIII measures for dust control during construction. These control measures are intended to reduce the amount of PM10 emissions during the construction period.

Mitigation Measure AiR-1: Consistent with San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions), the following controls are required to be included as specifications for the proposed project and implemented at the construction site:
• All disturbed areas, including storage piles, which are not being actively utilized for construction purposes, shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant or covered with a tarp or other suitable cover or vegetative ground cover. • All on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access roads shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant.

3. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Report by LSA Associates Inc. (LSA) in August of 2024 23 231
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City OF Clovis
• All land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land leveling, grading, cut and fill, and demolition activities shall be effectively controlled of fugitive dust emissions utilizing application of water or by presoaking.
• When materials are transported off site, all material shall be covered, or effectively wetted to limit visible dust emissions, and at least 6 inches of freeboard space from the top of the container shall be maintained.
• All operations shall limit or expeditiously remove the accumulation of mud or dirt from adjacent public streets at the end of each workday. (The use of dry rotary brushes is expressly prohibited except where preceded or accompanied by sufficient wetting to limit the visible dust emissions. Use of blower devices is expressly forbidden). • Following the addition of materials to, or the removal of materials from, the surface of outdoor storage piles, said piles shall be effectively stabilized of fugitive dust emissions utilizing sufficient water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant.

Construction emissions associated with the proposed project have a less-than-significant impact with mitigation implemented.
b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less-Than-Significant Impact. See discussion under Section 3a above. c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less-Than-Significant impact. Sensitive receptors are generally considered to include children, the elderly, and persons with pre-existing respiratory and cardiovascular illness. The SJVAPCD considers a sensitive receptor a location that houses or attracts children, the elderly, or people with illnesses. Examples of these receptors are considered to be hospitals, residences, schools and school facilities, daycare facilities, and convalescent facilities. The nearest sensitive receptors to the Project site would be the residences located approximately 75 feet west and 100 feet north of the project site.

Based the AQ/GHG Report, an evaluation of nearby land uses shows the maximum cancer risk for the residential receptor would be 9.92 in one million, which would not exceed the SJVAPCD cancer risk threshold of 20 in one million. The worker receptor risk would be lower at 6.02 In one million and the school receptor risk would be 0.24 in one million, which would also not exceed the SJVAPCD cancer risk thresholds. The total chronic hazard index would be 0.010 for the residential receptor MEI and worker receptor MEI and less than

0.001 for the school receptor MEI, which are all below the threshold of 1.0. In addition, the total acute hazard index would be nominal (0.000), which would also not exceed the threshold of 1.0. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would not exceed SJVAPCD thresholds and would not expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. No significant health risk would occur from project construction emissions. Additionally, compliance with SJVAPCD rules would further limit doses and exposures, reducing potential health risk related to vehicle and equipment emissions to a level that is not significant. Once the proposed project is constructed, it would not be a source of substantial emissions.

Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur with no mitigation measures. d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
24 232
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006. PDP2024-002, ANDTM6482
Initial Study
City OF Clovis
Less-Than-Significant Impact. Generally, sources considered to emit odors are associated with wastewater treatment facilities, sanitary landfills, petroleum refineries, chemical manufacturing, and other industrial/manufacturing related uses. During project construction, some odors may be present due to diesel exhaust. However, these odors would be temporary and limited to the construction period. The proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Any odors in general would be confined mainly to the project site and would readily dissipate. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. Thus, a less-thanslgnlficant impact would occur with no mitigation measures.

4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies or regulations, or by
the Califomia Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
X
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or
US Fish and Wildlife Service?
X
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vemal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
X
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
X
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a
tree preservation policy or ordinance?
X
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
X
Environmental Setting
A Biological Resources Evaluation (BRE) was prepared by LSA in June 2024 (see Appendix B). This BRE included a literature review, records search, and field survey on May 1, 2024, to identify the existence and potential for occurrence of sensitive or special-status plant and animal species in the project vicinity. The Project site is located on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and 25 233
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002. ANDTM6482
iNFTiAL Study
City of Clovis
accessory buildings. The site is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities
Discussion
a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Sen/ice?
Less-Than-Significant Impact With Mitigation. As described in the BRE, is located on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. The site comprises of an existing single-family residence and no natural plant communities occur in the area of the Project site."^ No special-status wildlife species or diagnostic signs of special-status wildlife species were present on the Project site, however, may be marginally suitable for isolated habitat for several regionally occurring specialstatus species (Swainson's hawk). Mature trees on the site could provide suitable nesting habitat for treenesting species. During the May 1, 2024 survey of the site, there were no signs indicating occupation by these species.

Implementation of mitigation measures BIO-1, BIO-2, and BIO-3 would ensure that a iess-than-significant impact with mitigation occurs.

Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Pre-Activity Surveys for Swainson's Hawk Nests. If Project activities must occur during the nesting season (February 15 to August 31), pre-activity surveys shall be conducted for Swainson's hawk nests within 14 days prior to the start of construction. The surveys would be conducted within the Project site plus a 0.5-mile buffer. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the methodology outlined in existing protocols. Note that Sawinson's hawks may establish a nest at any time from February through June; multiple Swainson's hawks nest surveys may be necessary in one season at the direction of a qualified biologist, depending on the timing of Project construction. If no Swainson's hawk nests are found, no further action is required.

Mitigation Measure BIO-2: Swainson's Hawk Nest Avoidance. If an active Swainson's hawk nest is discovered at any time within 0.5 mile of active construction, a qualified biologist shall complete an assessment of the potential for current construction activities to impact the nest. The assessment shali consider the type of construction activities to impact the nest. The assessment shall consider the type of construction activities, the location of construction relative to the nest, the visibility of construction activities from the nest location, and other existing disturbances in the area that are not related to construction activities of this Project. Based on this assessment, the biologist shall determine if construction activities can proceed and if nest monitoring will be required. At a minimum, construction activities shali not occur within 100 feet of an active nest and shali require monitoring if within 500 feet of an active nest. These buffers may need to increase depending on the sensitivity of the nest location.

Mitigation Measure BIO-3: Pre-Activity Nesting Bird Surveys. If Project activities must occur during the nesting season (February 15 to August 31), pre-activity nesting bird surveys shall be conducted no more than 7 days prior to the start of construction at the construction site plus a 250-foot buffer for songbirds and a 500-foot buffer for raptors (other than Swainson's hawk). If no active nests are found, no further action is required; however, note that nests may become active at any time throughout the summer, including when construction activities are occurring. If active nests are found during the 4 Biological Resources Evaluation prepared by LSA, June 2024. 26 234
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
survey or at any time during Project construction, an avoidance buffer ranging from 50 feet to 350 feet shall be required, as determined by a qualified bioiogist. The avoidance buffer shail remain in place until the biologist has determined that the young are no ionger reliant on the nest. Work may occur within the avoidance buffer under the approvai and guidance of the biologist. The biologist shali have the abiiity to stop construction if nesting aduits show signs of distress.

Project impacts to special-status species will be reduced to a less-than-signiflcant Impact with mitigation implemented.
b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in iocai or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
No impact. There are no sensitive naturai communities present. Therefore, the Project would have no impacts to sensitive naturai communities and no measures are required. c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands as (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
No Impact. No Jurisdictional aquatic resources are present on the Project site. No impacts to Jurisdictional resources would occur with construction of the Project and no measures are required. d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory ifsh or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
No Impact. The BRE did not identify the site as a regional or local wildlife movement corridors,® thus, no impact would occur.
e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
No Impact. The Project is not iocated within the boundaries of an adopted Habitat Conservation Pian, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved habitat conservation pian. Development of the Project would not conflict with any habitat conservation plan; therefore, no impact would occur and no mitigation measures are required.
f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The City and Fresno County currentiy do not have a regionai Natural Community Conservation Plan or a Habitat Conservation Plan. The Project site is subject to relevant biological resource policies of the 2014 General Plan. Therefore, there are no impacts to conservation plans. Overall, no impact would occur.

5. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No
Would the project: Significant With Mitigation Significant impact 5 Biological Resources Evaluation prepared by LSA, June 2024, page 3. 27 235
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002. AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
Impact Incorporated Impact
a. Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a
historical resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
X
b. Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant
to §15064.5?
X
c. Disturb any human remains,
including those interred outside
of formal cemeteries?
X
Environmental Setting
The Project site is located on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. The site is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities.

A Cultural Resource Assessment (Cultural Study) was prepared by Peak & Associates, Inc. dated June 24, 2024 (see Appendix C). This cultural assessment included a records search at the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (SSJVIC), Native American Heritage Commission's (NAHC) Sacred Lands File, desktop archival research, as well as a pedestrian survey of the Project site.

In addition to the Cultural Study, City staff conducted Native American Consultation in compliance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB52). In compliance with AB52, invitations for consultation were mailed on July 11, 2024 which affords Native tribes thirty (30) days to respond and to request consultation. During this timeframe, no requests for consultations were received.

Discussion
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5?
Less-Than-Significant Impact With Mitigation. As previously mentioned, the Project site is located on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. The site is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities. A cultural resource records search was conducted for the Area of Potential Effects (APE) and a 0.25-mile radius at the SSJVIC on May 13, 2024. The search indicated that no prehistoric sites were found during the survey, there is a slight possibility that a site may exist and be totally obscured by vegetation, fill or other historic activities, leaving no surface evidence. Should artifacts or unusual amounts of stone, bone, or shell be uncovered during construction activities, an archeologist should be consulted for on-the spot evaluation of the finding.® Further, compliance with Policy 2.9 of the General Plan, which calls for the preservation of historical sites and buildings of state or national significance, would ensure that if there were historical resources present, they would be protected. Because there is the slight possibility for the accidental or inadvertent uncovering of archaeological resources during construction. Mitigation Measure CULT-1 would serve to reduce those potential impacts by requiring any work to stop until any found artifacts can be properly removed and inventoried by a qualified archaeologist. Therefore, regarding the Project causing a substantial adverse 6 Cultural Resource Assessment by Peck & Associates, June 24,2024, pages 11-12. 28 236
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
iNtTiAL Study
City of Clovis
change in the significance of a historical resource the Project would result in a less-than-significant impact with mitigation.

Mitigation Measure CULT-1: If prehistoric or historic-era cultural or archaeological materials are encountered during construction activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find shall halt until a qualified professional archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeologist, can evaluate the significance of the find and make recommendations. Cultural resource materials may include prehistoric resources such as flaked and ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone, ceramics, and fire-affected rock as well as historic resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or structural remnants.

If the qualified professional archaeologist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant cultural resource, additional investigations may be required to mitigate adverse impacts from project implementation. These additional studies may include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or data recovery excavation.

If a potentially eligible resource is encountered, then the qualified professional archaeologist, the Lead Agency, and the project proponent shall arrange for either 1) total avoidance of the resource or 2) test excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if eligible, total data recovery. The determination shall be formally documented in writing and submitted to the Lead Agency as verification that the provisions for managing unanticipated discoveries have been met.
b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
Less-Than-Significant Impact With Mitigation. The Project site is located on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. The site is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities. The site's ground has been previously disturbed as a result of the agriculture, single-family residence and other ground disturbing activities throughout the years. Nevertheless, the potential remains that archeological resources could be inadvertently or accidentally uncovered during ground-disturbing activities such as trenching, digging, and the installation of utilities and other infrastructure.

Because there is the slight possibility for the accidental or inadvertent uncovering of archaeological resources during construction. Mitigation Measure CULT-1 would serve to reduce those potential impacts by requiring any work to stop until any found artifacts can be properly removed and inventoried by a qualified archaeologist. Therefore, the Project would result in a less-than-significant impact with mitigation. c) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less-Than-Significant Impact With Mitigation. The Project site is located on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. The site is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities The site's ground has been previously disturbed as a result of the agriculture, and residential uses and other ground disturbing activities throughout the years. Nevertheless, the potential remains that human remains could be inadvertently or accidentally uncovered during ground-disturbing activities such as trenching, digging, and the installation of utilities and other infrastructure.

Because there is the slight possibility for the accidental or inadvertent uncovering of human remains during construction. Mitigation Measure CULT-2 would serve to reduce those potential impacts by requiring any work 29 237
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
to stop until any found human remains can be properly removed by the County coroner and/or tribes.

Therefore, the Project wouid resuit in a less-than-significant impact with mitigation.

Mitigation Measure CULT-2: If human remains are discovered during construction or operational activities, further excavation or disturbance shaii be prohibited pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the Caiifomia Heaith and Safety Code. The specific protocol, guidelines, and channeis of communication outlined by the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the Pubiic Resources Code (Chapter 1492, Statutes of 1982, Senate Bili 297), and Senate Bill 447 (Chapter 44, Statutes of 1987), shall be followed. Section 7050.5(c) shali guide the potential Native American invoivement, in the event of discovery of human remains, at the direction of the County coroner. Ali reports, correspondence, and determinations regarding the discovery of human remains on the project site shall be submitted to the Lead Agency.

6. ENERGY
Wouid the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Result in a potentiaily significant
environmentai impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or
operation?
X
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or
iocai plan for renewable energy or
energy efficiency?
X
Environmental Setting
The Project site is located on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. The site is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities.

DISCUSSION
a) Would the project result In a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, Inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project proposes the construction of 266 singie-famiiy homes on ±36.92 acres, along with associated iandscape, hardscape, and infrastructure (i.e., drive aisles, utilities, etc.). The Project would include construction activities typicai of residential development, thus, is not generaliy considered the type of use or intensity that wouid result in the unnecessary consumption of energy. The units themseives would comply with Title 24 Green Building Standards for energy efficiency, as weli as be required to compiy with the latest water efficient iandscape policy regulations, and Caiifomia Buiiding Code. Further, the Project wouid be required to compiy with Clovis 2014 Generai Plan Policy 3.4, and 3.7 of the Open Space and Conservation, which cali for the use of water conserving and drought toierant iandscape, as weii as energy efficient buiidings. Consequently, compliance with these measures would ensure that the Project does not result in a significant impact due to the unnecessary consumption of energy and less-than-slgnlficant impact would occur with no mitigation measures.
30 238
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311. R2024-006. PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. See discussion under Section 6a above.

7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault,
as delineated on the most recent
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State Geologist for
the area or based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault?
X
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? X
iii. Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction? X
iv. Landslides? X
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss
of topsoil? X
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as
a result of the project, and potentially result
in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
X
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial direct or
indirect risks to life or property?
X
e. Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
altemative waste disposal systems where
sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
X
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or unique geologic
feature?
X
Environmental Setting
The 2014 Clovis General Plan EIR identified no geologic hazards or unstable soil conditions known to exist on the Project site.
31 239
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial study
City of Clovis
Discussion
a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Aiquist-Prioio Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?; ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?; Hi) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?; iv) Landslides? Less-Than-Significant Impact. Although the Project site does not have any known faults on the site, the potential remains that seismic ground-shaking could occur from the fault located east of the Project. However, adherence to the most current California Building Codes would ensure that the structures are constructed safely and in compliance with the appropriate building codes. With regards to liquefaction, the 2014 General Plan EIR states that the soil types in the area are not considered conducive to iiquefaction due to their high clay content or from being too coarse.^ Further, the site is generally flat and therefore landslides would not occur at the Project site. Overall, due to the location away from a known fault, adherence to the most recent California Building Codes, and the flat topography, a less-than-significant impact would occur with regards to potential impacts from seismic activity.
b) Would the project result in substantial soli erosion or the loss of topsoii? Less-Than-Slgnificant Impact. Although the site is relatively flat, grading activities would be required to ensure a flat and graded surface prior to construction, which may result in the soil erosion and loss of topsoii.

However, as part of the Project, grading plans are required to be submitted and approved by the Engineering Division to ensure appropriate grading of the site. Thus, this review and approval process would ensure that a less-than-significant impact occur and no mitigation measures are required. c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, iiquefaction or collapse?
Less-Than-Significant impact. See discussion under Section 7a. d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating direct or indirect substantial risks to life or property? No impact. According to the 2014 Clovis General Plan EIR, expansive soils are mostly present in areas along the northern edge of the non-Sphere of Influence (SOI) and the easternmost part of the Clovis non-SOl plan area. Because the Project is not within the vicinity of these areas, there would be no potential for creating direct or indirect substantial risks to life or property with regards to expansive soils. As a result, no impact would occur.
e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No impact. The Project does not propose the use of septic tanks; therefore, no impact would occur. 7 2014 Clovis General Plan EIR, Chapter 5: Geology and Soils, page 5.6-3. 32 240
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City OF Clovis
f) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paieontoiogicai resource or unique geologic feature?
Less-Than-Significant Impact With Mitigation. The Project site has been previously disturbed, as well as the immediately surrounding areas with no known occurrences of the discovery of paieontoiogicai resources, in addition, the BRE concluded that the potential for uncovering of subsurface deposits is unlikely.

Nevertheless, the possibility remains that the inadvertent or accidental discovery could occur during ground disturbing construction activities. However, Mitigation Measure GEO-1, below, would serve to protect the accidental discovery of paieontoiogicai resources. As such, a iess-than-significant with mitigation impact would occur.

Mitigation Measure GEO-1: If prehistoric or historic-era cultural materials are encountered during construction activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find shall halt until a qualified professional archaeologist and/or paieontologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeologist, can evaluate the significance of the find and make recommendations. Cultural resource materials may include prehistoric resources such as flaked and ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone, ceramics, and fire-affected rock as well as historic resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or structural remnants.

If the qualified professionai determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant cultural resource, additional investigations may be required to mitigate adverse impacts from project implementation. These additional studies may include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or data recovery excavation.
if a potentially eligible resource is encountered, then the qualified professionai archaeologist and/or paleontologist, the Lead Agency, and the project proponent shall arrange for either 1) total avoidance of the resource or 2) test excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if eligible, total data recovery. The determination shall be formally documented in writing and submitted to the Lead Agency as verification that the provisions for managing unanticipated discoveries have been met.

8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Generate greenhouse gas
emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the
environment?
X
b. Conflict with any applicable plan,
policy or regulation of an agency
adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse
gases?
X
Environmental Setting
Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are referred to as greenhouse gases (GHGs) because they capture heat radiated from the sun as it is reflected into the atmosphere. The accumulation of GHG's has been impiicated as a driving force for global climate change. Definitions of climate change vary between and across regulatory authorities and the scientific community, but in general can be described as the changing of the 33 241
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006. PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
INITIAL Study
CityofClovis
earth's climate caused by natural fluctuations and anthropogenic activities which alter the composition of the global atmosphere.

Individual projects contribute to the cumulative effects of climate change by emitting GHGs during construction and operational phases. The principal GHGs are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and water vapor. While the presence of the primary GHGs in the atmosphere are naturally occurring, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) are largely emitted from human activities, accelerating the rate at which these compounds occur within earth's atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is the "reference gas" for climate change, meaning that emissions of GHGs are typically reported in "carbon dioxide-equivalent" measures.

Emissions of carbon dioxide are largely by-products of fossil fuel combustion, whereas methane results from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Other GHGs, with much greater heatabsorption potential than carbon dioxide, include hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride, and are generated in certain industrial processes.

There is intemational scientific consensus that human-caused increases in GHGs have and will continue to contribute to global warming, although there is uncertainty concerning the magnitude and rate of the warming.

Potential global warming impacts in California may include, but are not limited to, loss in snowpack, sea level rise, more extreme heat days per year, more high ozone days, more large forest fires, and more drought years. Secondary effects are likely to include a global rise in sea level, impacts to agriculture, changes in disease vectors, and changes in habitat and biodiversity.

In 2005, in recognition of California's vulnerability to the effects of climate change. Executive Order 8-3-05 was signed. The order sets forth a series of target dates by which statewide emission of GHGs would be progressively reduced, as follows: by 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels; by 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; and by 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. In 2006, California passed the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Assembly Bill 32), which requires the California Air Resources Board to design and implement emission limits, regulations, and other measures, such that feasible and cost-effective statewide GHG emissions are reduced to 1990 levels by 2020.

In December 2009, the SJVAPCD adopted guidance for addressing GHG impacts in its Guidance for Valley Land Use Agencies In Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for New Projects under CEQA. The guidance relies on performance-based standards, otherwise known as Best Performance Standards (BPS), to assess significance of project-specific GHG emissions on global climate change during the environmental review process. Projects can reduce their GHG emission impacts to a less than significant level by implementing BPS. Projects can also demonstrate compliance with the requirements of AB 32 by demonstrating that their emissions achieve a 29% reduction below "business as usual" (BAD) levels. BAD is a projected GHG emissions inventory assuming no change in existing business practices and without considering implementation of any GHG emission reduction measures.

Significance Criteria
The SJVAPCDs Guidance for Valley Land Use Agencies In Addressing GHG Impacts for New Projects Under CEQA provides initial screening criteria for climate change analyses, as well as draft guidance for the determination of significance.

The effects of project specific GHG emissions are cumulative, and therefore climate change impacts are addressed as a cumulative, rather than a direct, impact. The guidance for determining significance of impacts has been developed from the requirements of Assembly Bill 32. The guideline addresses the potential cumulative impacts that a project's GHG emissions could have on climate change. 34 242
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311. R2024-006, PDP20244)02, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City OF Clovis
Since climate change is a global phenomenon, no direct impact would be identified for an individual land development project. The following criteria are used to evaluate whether a project would result in a significant impact for climate change impacts:
• Does the project comply with an adopted statewide, regional, or local plan for reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions?
• Does the project achieve 29% GHG reductions by using approved Best Performance Standards? • Does the project achieve Assembly Bill 32 targeted 29% GHG emission reductions compared with BAU?
Projects that meet one of these guidelines would have less-than-significant impact on the global climate. The goal of 29% below BAU for emissions of GHG has been used as a threshold of significance for this analysis.

In December 2022 the 2022 Scoping Plan was approved by the GARB which assesses progress toward achieving carbon neutrality by 2045. Because neither the City of Clovis or the SJVAPCD have developed or adopted numerical GHG significance threshold, the proposed Project was analyzed for consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan consistent with statewide climate goals. The 2022 Scoping Plan includes key project attributes that reduce operational GHG emissions.

Discussion
a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
Significant and Unavoidabie impact. The Project would include the construction and operation of 266 single-family homes and associated infrastructure (i.e., sewer and water infrastructure, roadways, sidewalks, etc.). As such, short-term GHG emissions would be produced through the construction phase of the Project.

Using CalEEMod, it is estimated that the annual emissions associated with construction of the proposed project would be approximately 1,545.0 metric tons of CO2 e per year. Additionally, long-term GHG emissions are typically generated from mobile sources (e.g., vehicle and truck trips), area sources (e.g., maintenance activities and landscaping), indirect emissions from sources associated with energy consumption, waste sources (land filling and waste disposal), and water sources (water supply and conveyance, treatment, and distribution). As part of the AQ/GHG Report,® the proposed Project would result in emissions of approximately 2,650.4 MT CO2 e per year. With this information, the Project was analyzed for consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan. The 2022 Scoping Plan includes key project attributes that reduce operational GHG emission in Appendix D, Local Actions, of the 2022 Scoping Plan.

The first approach the State recommends for determining whether a proposed residential or mixed-use residential development would align with the State's climate goals is to examine whether the project includes key project attributes that reduce operational GHG emissions. As demonstrated in Table K of the AQ/GHG Report,® the Project would not be consistent with the 2022 Scoping Plan key residential and mixed-use project attributes related to VMT reduction. As discussed in Table K and in the project's TIA, the proposed project would result in a significant and unavoidable VMT impact. As previously noted, the project is consistent with the City's General Plan. During preparation of the General Plan, an EIR was prepared, along with a Statement of Overriding Consideration, that discussed the potential environmental impacts and required mitigation 8 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Report, LSA, August 2024. 9 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Report, LSA, August 2024. 35 243
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
measures to be implemented/followed by all future projects that are consistent with the General Plan. The proposed project would be conditioned to implement and follow these measures. Therefore, though proposed project would have a significant and unavoidable transportation impact under CEQA, no further mitigation measure would be required for the project related to VMT.

As discussed above, the proposed project would generally comply with existing State regulations adopted to achieve the overall GHG emissions reduction goals identified in the 2022 RTF. However, as described above, the proposed project would not be consistent with the 2022 Scoping Plan key residential and mixed-use project attributes related to VMT reduction. As such, the proposed project would not contribute to its "fair share" of emission reductions required to support achieving long-term State GHG reduction goals due to project's significant and unavoidable VMT impact. Therefore, the proposed project would conflict with the plans and policies adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases, including the GARB 2022 Scoping Plan, Executive Order B-30-15, SB 32, and AB 1279. As such, although the proposed project would have a significant and unavoidabie impact under CEQA, no further mitigation measures would be required for the project related to GHG.
b) Would the project conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Significant and Unavoidable Impact. Based on the AQ/GHG Report,^^ the overall GHG emissions reduction goals were identified in the 2022 RTF. However, as described above, the proposed project would not be consistent with the 2022 Scoping Plan key residential and mixed-use project attributes related to VMT reduction. As such, the proposed project would not contribute to its "fair share" of emission reductions required to support achieving long-term State GHG reduction goals due to project's significant and unavoidabie VMT impact. Therefore, the proposed project would conflict with the plans and policies adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases, including the GARB 2022 Scoping Plan, Executive Order B-30-15, SB 32, and AB 1279.Gonsequently, the AQ/GHG Report found this potential impact to be a significant and unavoidabie impact, however, as discussed above no additional mitigation measures required based on the Project's consistency with the General Plan designation of Medium High Density and the Heritage Grove Growth planned growth area.

9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Greate a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
X
b. Greate a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
X
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter
X
10 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Report, LSA, August 2024. 36 244
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City OF Clovis
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a
list of hazardous materials sites compiied
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a resuit, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
X
e. For a project iocated within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or pubiic use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard or
excessive noise for people residing or
working in the project area?
X
f. Impair impiementation of or physicaily
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
X
g. Expose people or structures, either directiy
or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wiidland fires?
X
Environmental Setting
For purposes of this chapter, the term "hazardous materials" refers to both hazardous substances and hazardous wastes. A "hazardous material" is defined in the Code of Federai Reguiations (CFR) as "substance or materiai that is capable of posing an unreasonable risk to heaith, safety, and property when transported in commerce" (49 CFR 171.8). Califomia Health and Safety Code Section 25501 defines a hazardous material as "any material that, because of its quantity, concentration, or physical, or chemical characteristics, poses a significant present or potentiai hazard to human heaith and safety or to the environment if reieased into the workplace or the environment." Hazardous materials include, but are not limited to, hazardous substances, hazardous waste, and any material which a handler or the administering agency has a reasonable basis for beiieving that it would be injurious to the health and safety of persons or harmful to the environment if released into the workpiace or the environment.
"Hazardous wastes" are defined in Caiifomia Health and Safety Code Section 25141(b) as wastes that "...because of their quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious characteristics, [may either] cause or significantiy contribute to an increase in mortaiity or an increase in serious illness, or pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed of, or otherwise managed."
The nearest school to the Project site is Riverview Eiementary School, located approximately one and a half (1.5) mile west of the site at its ciosest point.

Discussion
a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project consists of the construction of 266 single-family homes on ±36.92 acres. The type of hazardous materials that would be associated with the Project are those typical of residential uses, such as the use of household cleaners, landscape maintenance products, soaps, and 37 245
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
potential pesticides (for pest control). These materiais, when used and applied properly, would not necessarily create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Further, these materials are not anticipated to be stored in large quantities that could pose a threat. Overall, the Project would not routinely transport, use, or dispose of hazardous materiais other than those typical of residential development, which are not generally considered of the type or quantity that would pose a significant hazard to the public when used as directed.

During construction, typical equipment and materials would be used that are associated with residential construction; however, any chemicals or materiais would be handled, stored, disposed of, and/or transported according to applicable laws. Consequently, because the Project is not of the type of use that would routinely transport, use, or dispose of hazardous materials a less-than-slgnificant impact would occur with no mitigation measures.
b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materiais into the environment?
Less-Than-Signlficant Impact. See discussion above under Section 9a. c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materiais, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. As mentioned above, the Project site is located approximately one and a half (1.5) mile from the nearest school. Further, the Project is not of the type of use typically associated with emitting hazardous emissions or handling the type or quantity of hazardous materials such that it would pose a risk or threat to the school, or surrounding area. Therefore, no Impact would occur. d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materiais sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the pubiic or the environment?
No Impact. According to the California Department of Toxic Substance Control EnviroStor Database, the Project site is not located on or within the immediate vicinity of a hazardous materiais site.""^ Therefore, no Impact would occur.
e) For a project iocated within an airport iand use pian or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miies of a pubiic airport or pubiic use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The Project is located approximately seven (7) miles northeast of the Fresno Yosemite International Airport and is not within the Airport Influence Area, safety zones, noise, or airspace and overflight areas. Therefore, no impact would occur.
f) impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response pian or emergency evacuation pian?
Less-Than-Slgnificant Impact. The Project will connect in the internal street network to N. Peach, E.

Behymer, and N. Minnewawa Avenues. Although the Project could result in temporary traffic detouring or closures during buildout, these delays would be temporary and would be coordinated with the City Planning 11 California Department of Toxic Substance Control, EnviroStor Database, https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?globalJd=71003467, accessed on September 30, 2024. 38 246
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
and Development Services Department and other departments to ensure safe access to and from the area is maintained. Further, the site itself would be reviewed by City departments to ensure adequate site access and circulation is provided in the event of an emergency. Overall, a less-than-significant impact would occur with no mitigation measures.
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or Indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project site it is not located in an area typically associated with wildfires.

Although urban fires could occur, the Project would be constructed to the latest fire code standards, which would include fire sprinklers in each unit, as well as the installation of several fire hydrants throughout the site as required by the Clovis Fire Department. Further, other life safety features would be required such as smoke detectors, which would be reviewed and checked by the Fire Department to ensure proper operation prior to occupancy. Ultimately, a less-than-significant Impact would occur with no mitigation measures.

10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground water
quality?
X
b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
X
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem
of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious surfaces, in
a manner which would: (i) result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site; (ii)
substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or offsite; (iii) create or
contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff; or (iv)
impede or redirect flood flows?
X
i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation
on- or off-site? X
ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or offsite? X
iii. Create or contribute runoff water which X
39 247
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002. AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? X
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to protect inundation? X
e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
X
Environmental Setting
The City is within the drainages of three streams: Dry Creek, Dog Creek, and Redbank Slough. On the north.

Dry Creek discharges into the Herndon Canal in the City of Fresno west of Clovis. South of Dry Creek, Dog Creek is a tributary of Redbank Slough, which discharges into Mill Ditch south of Clovis (USGS 2012). A network of storm drains in the City discharge into 31 retention basins, most of which provide drainage for a one- to two-square-mile area. Most of the Plan Area east and northeast of the City is not in drainage areas served by retention basins.

The Project is located within the FMFCD boundary, and subject to its standards and regulations. Detention and retention basins in the FMFCD's flood control system are sized to accommodate stormwater from each basin's drainage area in built out condition. The current capacity standard for FMFCD basins is to contain runoff from six inches of rainfall during a 10-day period and to infiltrate about 75 to 80 percent of annual rainfall into the groundwater basin (Rourke 2014). Basins are highly effective at reducing average concentrations of a broad range of contaminants, including several polyaromatic hydrocarbons, total suspended solids, and most metals (FMFCD 2013). Pollutants are removed by filtration through soil, and thus do not reach the groundwater aquifer (FMFCD 2014). Basins are built to design criteria exceeding statewide Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) standards (FMFCD 2013). The urban flood control system provides treatment for all types of development—not just the specific categories of development defined in a SUSMP—^thus providing greater water quality protection for surface water and groundwater than does a SUSMP.

In addition to their flood control and water quality functions, many FMFCD basins are used for groundwater recharge with imported surface water during the dry season through contracts with the FID and the cities of Fresno and Clovis (FMFCD 2013).

The pipeline collection system in the urban flood control system is designed to convey the peak flow rate from a two-year storm.

Most drainage areas in the urban flood control system do not discharge to other water bodies and drain mostly through infiltration into groundwater. When necessary, FMFCD can move water from a basin in one such drainage area to a second such basin by pumping water into a street and letting water flow in curb and gutter to a storm drain inlet in an adjoining drainage area (Rourke 2014). Two FMFCD drainage areas discharge directly to the San Joaquin River, and three to an irrigation canai, without storage in a basin. Six drainage areas containing basins discharge to the San Joaquin River, and another 39 basins discharge to canals (FMFCD 2013).
40 248
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, and TM6482
iNiTtAL Study
City of Clovis
A proposed development that would construct more Impervious area on its project site than the affected detention/retention basin is sized to accommodate is required to infiltrate some stormwater onsite, such as through an onsite detention basin or drainage swales (Rourke 2014).

The Big Dry Creek Reservoir has a total storage capacity of about 30 thousand acre-feet (taf) and controls up to 230-year flood flows. Fancher Creek Dam and Reservoir hold up to 9.7 taf and controls up to 200-year flood flows. Redbank Creek Dam and Reservoir hold up to 1 taf and controls up to 200-year flood flows.

Groundwater
Clovis is underlain by the Kings Groundwater Basin that spans 1,530 square miles of central Fresno County and small areas of northern Kings and Tulare counties. Figure 5.9-4, Kings Groundwater Basin, shows that the basin is bounded on the north by the San Joaquin River, on the west by the Delta-Mendota and Westside Subbasins, the south by the Kings River South Fork and the Empire West Side Irrigation District, and on the east by the Sierra Nevada foothills. Depth to groundwater in 2016 ranged from 196.5 feet at the northwest City boundary to 69.5 feet at the southeast City boundary (Clovis 2016), 25 feet at the southeast SOI boundary, and about 20 feet at the eastern Plan Area boundary (RD 2013). The Kings Subbasin has been identified as critically overdrafted (Provost & Pritchard 2011).

In the Plan Area, groundwater levels are monitored by the City of Clovis and FID. The overall area has not experienced land subsidence due to groundwater pumping since the early 1900s (FID 2006). Subsidence occurs when underground water or natural resources (e.g., oil) are pumped to the extent that the ground elevation lowers. No significant land subsidence is known to have occurred in the last 50 years as a result of land development, water resources development, groundwater pumping, or oil drilling (FID 2006). The City has identified a localized area of subsidence of 0.6 feet in the vicinity of Minnewawa and Herndon Avenues within the last 14 years (Clovis 2016). Regional ground subsidence in the Plan Area was mapped as less than one foot by the US Geological Survey in 1999 (Galloway and Riley 1999). Groundwater levels in the San Joaquin Valley are forecast to hit an all-time low In 2014 (UCCHM 2014).

New development in accordance with the General Plan Update would increase the amount of impervious surface in the Plan Area, potentially affecting the amount of surface water that filters into the groundwater supply. Groundwater levels are monitored in the Plan Area by the FID and the City of Clovis. As described in the 2015 City of Clovis Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), groundwater recharge occurs both naturally and artificially throughout the City. The Kings Groundwater Basin area is recharged through a joint effort between the Cities of Clovis and Fresno and the FID (CDWR 2006). Approximately 8,400 acre-feet per year (afy) of water are intentionally recharged into the Kings Groundwater Basin by the City of Clovis, and approximately 7,700 afy of water naturally flow into groundwater in the City's boundaries (Clovis 2011).

The FMFCD urban stormwater drainage system would provide groundwater infiltration for runoff from developed land uses in detention basins in the drainage system service area.

Projects pursuant to the proposed General Plan Update and developed outside of the FMFCD urban stormwater drainage system would be required to meet the requirements of NPDES regulations, including the implementation of BMPs to improve water retention and vegetation on project sites.

Discussion
a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project is located on a site that was previousiy anticipated for residential use. As with any development, existing policies and standards are required to be complied with, which are 41 249
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
iNiTiAL Study
CrrvoF Clovis
assessed during review of the entitlements. As such, the Engineering Division, as well as outside agencies such as the FMFCD review all plans to ensure that none of the water quality standards are violated and that waste discharge requirements are adhered to during construction and operation of the Project. Consequently, this process of Project review and approval would ensure that a less-than-significant impact occur with no mitigation measures.
b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project would not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level due to the Project. The 2014 General Plan EIR identified a net decrease in ground water aquifer throughout the region, however, because the City's domestic water system is primarily served through surface water via existing water entitlements, the loss of aquifer is less than significant. The City has developed a surface water treatment plant (opened in June 2004) that reduces the need for pumped groundwater, and has also expanded the municipal groundwater recharge facility. The Projects impacts to groundwater are less than significant with no mitigation measures required. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would: (i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; (ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; (Hi) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources cif polluted runoff; or (iv) impede or redirect flood flows? Less-Than-Slgnificant Impact. There are no streams or rivers on the site that would be altered as a result of the Project. The site is mostly pervious since it is currently undeveloped, and as a result, the Project would increase the number of impervious surfaces by installing paving for roadways and sidewalks. However, the drainage pattern would be constructed per existing policies and regulations through review of the plans by the City Engineering Division and the FMFCD to ensure the site is properly and adequately drained such that the storm drain system is maintained and so that no flooding occurs. Consequently, this review and approval by City engineers and FMFCD would mean that the Project result in a less-than-signlficant impact would occur with no mitigation measures.
d) Would the project, in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
Less-Than-Slgnlflcant Impact. Due to the Central Valley's location away from the ocean, an impact from a tsunami is unlikely. The majority of the site is located within the 1% annual flood (100-year flood) area as mapped by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); however, the CMC Section 8.12, Floodplain Management lists standards and requirements for new construction within special flood zones; therefore, the Project would implement flood hazard management as required by the CMC. As a result of adhering to required flood hazard management, the Project would not risk the release of pollutants due to inundation and consequentiy, the Project would result in a less-than-significant impact would occur with no mitigation measures.
e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan ?
42 250
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City OF Clovis
Less-Than-Significant Impact. The City of Clovis is within the North Kings County Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA). Pursuant to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014 (SGMA), certain regions in California are required to develop and implement a groundwater management plan that sustainably manages groundwater resources. The proposed Project would comply with the 2020 City of Clovis UWMP which promotes programs and policies to manage water supplies. Nevertheless, the Project would derive the majority of its water from surface water sources and does not propose or include plans for groundwater use. With regards to water quality control, the Project would be required to adhere to appropriate storm drain conveyance and the protection of water resources which would include the installation of backfiow preventers. Consequently, the Project would result in a less-than-significant impact with no mitigation measures.

11. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Wouid the project:

Potentially
Significant
impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
impact
No
impact
a. Physically divide an existing
community? X
b. Cause a significant environmental
impact due to a conflict with any land
use plan, policy, or regulation adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
X
Environmental Setting
As described above in the Project Description, the Project site is located on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. The site is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities.

Discussion
a) Would the project physically divide an existing community? Less-Than-Significant impact. Although the site is located on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings, the general area surrounding the property is designated for future residential development of varying densities. Typically, physically dividing existing communities is associated with the construction of a new road intersecting an established area or introducing uses that are not necessarily in line with the existing uses and planned land uses of the area. However, the Project site has been previously designated in the 2014 Clovis General Plan and zoned for residential use.

Consequently, because the proposed Project is the type of use previously planned for this site and the general areas, it would not physically divide an existing community. Rather, it seeks to add new housing stock to the City with installation of a new public sidewalk and roadway infrastructure. Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. b) Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less-Than-Significant impact. As mentioned in the Existing Setting Section above, the Project site is currently within the County of Fresno Jurisdiction and zoned AE-20 (Exclusive Agricultural). However, the Project site will be rezoned to the R-1-PRD (Single-Family Planned Residential Development) Zone District 43 251
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
though this entitlement application (Rezone 2024-006). According to Section 9.10.010(B)(5) of the CMC, the R-1-PRD Zone District Identifies areas appropriate for single-family small lot uses, Including attached and detached single-family structures on small lots. If approved, the Project will be required to go through the RSPR entitlement process for review for compliance with relevant design policies, such as In the Heritage Grove Master Plan, the CMC, and the General Plan. During the review, the height, color, and materials are reviewed for consistency with these plans and guidelines. As a result of the Project In complying with the land use and zoning designation upon approval, as well as the review process ensuring General Plan and other applicable policies are adhered to, the Project would result In a less-than-significant Impact with regards to conflicting with a land use plan. No mitigation measures are required.

12. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
impact
No
Impact
a. Result In the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would
be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
X
b. Result In the loss of availability of a
locally Important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other
land use plan?
•
X
Environmental Setting
The City of Clovis 2014 General Plan EIR defines minerals as any naturally occurring chemical elements or compounds formed from Inorganic processes and organic substances.''^ The 2014 General Plan EIR Indicates that there are no active mines or Inactive mines within the Plan Area of the City of Clovis.

Discussion
a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
No Impact. As stated above, the City of Clovis does not have any active mines or Inactive mines. Further, the Project site Is not zoned, designated, or otherwise mapped for mineral resource extraction, or for having mineral resources of value to the region present on or below the surface of the site. Therefore, no Impact would occur.
b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. Please refer to the discussion under Section 12a.

13. NOISE
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Would the project: Significant Significant With Significant Impact 12 2014 Clevis General Plan EIR, Chapters: Mineral Resources, page5.11-1. 44 252
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
Impact Mitigation
Incorporated
impact
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the vicinity of the project in excess
of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
X
b. Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels? X
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the
proiect area to excessive noise levels?
X
Environmental Setting
The Project site located on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. As such, existing ambient noise levels are typical of those associated with rural residential development, such as the sound of vehicles passing by, the sound of talking, and recreation could be expected within the Project vicinity. As a result of construction existing ambient noise levels may be slightly elevated as a result of the use of construction equipment, such as large trucks, tractors, and other construction tools associated with residential development. These increases would be temporary, however, and would cease upon completion of the neighborhood.

An acoustical analysis was prepared for the Project by LSA in August of 2024 and the analysis below is based in part on the study. As part of the acoustical analysis, noise exposure from traffic on E. Behymer and N.

Minnewawa Avenues was calculated for future conditions using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model. The acoustical analysis can be found in Appendix F of this Initial Study.

Discussion
a) Would the project result In generation of a substantial temporary or permanent Increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or appiicable standards of other agencies? Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project would include development of 266 single-family homes on an undeveloped site. Thus, the Project would result in a temporary and permanent increase in ambient noise levels as a result of construction and operation. However, as mentioned above, the Project site is located on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. The site is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities.

The Project would introduce new ambient noise from the construction and operation of the homes, these noises would represent the typical type of noise levels that is expected for a planned residential land use.

While increases in ambient noise would occur due to the construction of the Project, this increase would be temporary and would be required to adhere to local regulations limiting the hours of construction.

Section 9.22.080 of the Clovis Municipal Code. Table 3-1: Maximum Exterior Noise Standards sets the maximum permissible sound levels, categorized by land use, as summarized in Table D. The sound level 45 253
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, ANDTM6482
INITIAL Study
City of Clovis
limits set forth in the table shall not be exceeded by noise emanating from either the same land use category or a different land use category. Because of the residences near the project site, the applicable operational noise level standard for this project is 55 dBA Leq. Section 5.27.604 states that construction activities are only permitted between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday. From June 1 through September 15, permitted construction activity may commence after 6:00 a.m., Monday through Friday.

The acoustical analysis indicated that the increase in project-related traffic noise would be no greater than 0.9 dBA on currently constructed roads. Noise level increases less than 3 dBA are not perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. While there is an increase of 26.9 dBA CNEL on the segment of Peach Avenue south of Behymer Avenue, the overall noise level of 47.5 dBA CNEL would be well below the City's exterior noise level standard of 65 dBA CNEL for residential uses. Therefore, traffic noise impacts from project-related traffic on off-site sensitive receptors would a less-than-signifleant impact, and no mitigation measures are required.
b) Would the project result In generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project includes development of 266 single-family homes and associated infrastructure (i.e., sidewalks, roadways, curb, gutter, stormdrains, etc.). The proposed project would not generate vibration levels related to on-site operations. In addition, vibration levels generated from projectrelated traffic on the adjacent roadways are unusual for on-road vehicles because the rubber tires and suspension systems of on-road vehicles provide vibration isolation. Based on a reference vibration level of

0.076 in/sec PPV, structures greater than 20 ft from the roadways that contain project trips would experience vibration levels below the standard of 0.2 in/sec PPV; therefore, vibration levels generated from project-related traffic on the adjacent roadways would have a less-than-significant impact, and no mitigation measures are required.
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The Project is located approximately seven (7) miles northeast of the Fresno Yosemite International Airport and is not within the Airport Influence Area, safety zones, noise, or airspace and overflight areas. Therefore, no impact would occur.

14. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
X
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
X
46 254
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, ANDTM6482
Initial Study
City OF Clovis
Environmental Setting
The Project site is iocated on a primariiy undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buiidings. The site's topography is generally flat and characterized somewhat with fruit orchards.

Discussion
a) Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example through extension of roads or other infrastructure) ?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project would result in 266 singie-family homes. The Project site has an existing Generai Plan Land Use designation of Medium High Density Residential which ailows for a density range of 7.1 - 20.0 du/ac. Calcuiated with gross acres; the Project site would require a range of 262 to 738 dweliing units. The proposed density is 7.2 units per gross acre. Further, the Project includes residential use on a site that is planned for the type of use being proposed. Unplanned population growth is typicaiiy associated with providing new services in remote areas of the City or other infrastructure that was not previously identified in the Generai Pian. Although the Project would result in new housing units and popuiation to the site, this growth was previousiy planned and anticipated under the 2014 General Plan. Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Less-Than-Signiflcant Impact. The Project site is developed with one single family residence that is currently occupied. While there is an existing occupied home on the site, the Project is not displacing a substantiai number of peopie. Therefore, the Project wouid not resuit in the substantial displacement of existing people or housing and a less-than-signiflcant impact wouid occur.

15. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Wouid the Project resuit in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision
of new or physicaliy aitered governmental
facilities, need for new or physicaily altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other performance
obiectives for any of the public services:
a. Fire protection? X
b. Poiice protection? X
c. Schools? X
d. Parks? X
e. Other public faciiities? X
47 255
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006. PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
INITIAL Study
City OF Clovis
Environmental Setting
The Project would be served by the Clovis Fire Department, Clovis Police Department, with mutual aid from the City of Fresno, when needed. The Project site would also be within the Clovis Unified School District.

The nearest fire station is Fire Station #3, located approximately three (3) miles south of the site. The other closest fire station is Fire Station #5, located approximately six (6) miles to southeast of the site.

Discussion
a) Would the project result In substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection services? Less-Than-Slgnlficant Impact. Although the Project would result in 266 new residential units, the site is located adjacent to an area of the City that is already served by the Clovis Fire Department. Also, the site itself is in close proximity to Fire Station's #3 and #5, which would mean that response times should be able to be maintained during calls for service. As part of the entitlement process for the Project, the Clovis Fire Department will review the design and site layout to ensure adequate fire safety measures and site circulation are achieved. This would include placement of new fire hydrants in certain locations throughout the site, adequate drive widths for fire truck and emergency vehicle access, and the appropriate application of fire codes, such as installation of sprinkler systems, fire alarms, and smoke detectors. Overall, with the site's close proximity to numerous fire stations, construction that would meet the latest fire code standards, and review by the Clovis Fire Department, impacts related to effects on the performance of the Fire Department would be less-than-significant and no mitigation measures are required. b) Would the project result In substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental Impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police protection services?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. Although the Project would result in 266 new residential units, the site is located adjacent to an area of the City already served by the Clovis Police Department. The Clovis Police Department headquarters are located at 1233 Fifth Street, which is approximately five (5) miles from the site.

As part of the entitlement process for the Project, the Clovis Police Department will review the design and site layout to ensure adequate safety measures are achieved. Consequently, a iess-than-signlficant impact would occur and no mitigation measures are required.
c) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools? Less-Than Significant Impact. As part of the review process, Clovis Unified School District (CUSD) is provided the opportunity to comment and work closely with the City as development is proposed. As mentioned previously, the Project site was previously planned for residential development, as indicated in the 2014 Clovis General Plan. As such, the CUSD has been aware of the potential for this type of development at this location. As part of the process, the Project would be required to pay school fees which typically go towards the improvement and/or construction of new schools or expanding existing schools if and when needed, as determined by the CUSD. Therefore, because the Project is consistent with what was previously 48 256
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002. AND TM6482
Initial Study
City OF Clovis
planned for at this site in addition to payment of appropriate school fees set by the CUSD, a less-thansignificant Impact would occur and no mitigation measures are required. d) Would the project result In substantial adverse physical Impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause signiifcant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks? Less-Than-Signlficant Impact. Although the Project proposes one (1) ±33,000 square foot neighborhood park, this park would not cause significant environmental impacts in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks. Furthermore, the Project is required to request annexation to and provide a covenant for the Landscape Maintenance District. Consequently, a lessthan-significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures are required. e) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical Impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for other public facilities? Less-Than-Slgnificant Impact. Although the Project would result in 266 new residential units, residential uses have been previously planned for in the 2014 Clovis General Plan in this area. Also, through the entitlement process, the Project would undergo review by several departments and agencies for compliance with appropriate regulations and policies. This could result in various impact fees that are intended to maintain and enhance public facilities as appropriate to be able to accommodate the Project. As such, payment of the typical development fees, as well as project review by the different department and agencies, would result in the Project having a less-than-significant impact to public facilities. No mitigation measures are required.

16. RECREATION
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
impact
a. Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities
such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur
or be accelerated?
X
b. Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities that
might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
X
Environmental Setting
The nearest existing recreational site is Dry Creek Trailhead, located at the corner of Shepherd and Sunnyside Avenues. A future community park is planned approximately 530 feet southeast of the Project site.

Discussion
49 257
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002. AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less-Than-Significant Impact. As mentioned in the Population and Housing section of this Initial Study, the Project is of the type previously planned and accounted for in the 2014 Clovis General Plan. Although 266 new residential units would be constructed, therefore, adding new population to the area that may utilize parks within the surrounding area, this growth was planned for with regards to park usage throughout the city.

Further, the Project itself would include landscaped and open space areas on-site for its residents, as well as a pocket park space within the neighborhood, thereby, providing areas of recreation within the site itself. The Project would also be required to comply with 2014 General Plan Policy 2.2 of the Open Space and Conservation Element which encourages the incorporation of on-site natural resources. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physicai effect on the environment? Less-Than-Significant impact. The Project site itself would construct an on-site neighborhood park. The Project itself would not require the construction or expansion of new recreational facilities elsewhere that would have an adverse physicai effect on the environment. The Project would also be required to contribute a proportionate share towards the acquisition and development of future parks in order for the City to maintain its adopted ratio of providing four (4) acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, as stated in Policy 1.1 in the Open Space and Conservation Element of the 2014 General Plan, and Section 3.4.03 of the CMC. As such, a lessthan-signlflcant impact would occur and no mitigation measures are required.

17. TRANSPORTATION
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Conflict with a program plan,
ordinance or policy addressing the
circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian
facilities?
X
b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
X
c. Substantially increase hazards due to
a geometric design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
X
d. Result in inadequate emergency
access? X
Environmental Setting
The project is bound by N. Peach Avenue to the west, E. Behymer Avenue to the north, and N. Minnewawa Avenue to the east. The circulation network serving the site including internal site circulation will be constructed as part of the project.

According to the 2014 Clovis General Plan Circulation Diagram in the Circulation Element (Figure C-1 of the Circulation Element), North Peach Avenue is classified as a "Collector" street. Collectors generally intended to 50 258
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, and TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
provide for relatively short distance travel between and within neighborhoods and that serve longer through trips. East Behymer and North Minnewawa are classified as "Arterial" roads. An arterial road is a high-capacity road that connects different areas of the city and is a crucial part of the national transportation system. Arterial roads are designed to carry large amounts of traffic efficiently and minimize delays.

A Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared by LSA in October of 2024 (included as Appendix E of this Initial Study). The information and analysis in the following sections is based in part on the results of the TIA.

Discussion
a) Would the project conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? Less-Than-Significant Impact. As mentioned above, the site is on land that was previously planned for residential use in the 2014 Clovis General Plan. As described in the Population and Housing section above, the Project will be consistent with the planned density. The 2024 Clovis General Plan considers level of service (LOS) D as the LOS standard vehicle traffic operations, except for roadway segments that are adopted in the City's General Plan EIR to operate at LOS E or F. At study intersections under the jurisdiction of the City of Clovis, a significant impact would occur at a signalized intersection when LOS falls below the target LOS of D with the addition of project traffic or when project increases the average delay at an intersection already operating at an unacceptable LOS.

The TIA studied six (6) intersections 1) Willow and Behymer Avenues, 2) Willow and Perrin Avenues, 3) Peach and Behymer Avenues, 4) Minnewawa and Behymer Avenues, 5) Minnewawa and Perrin Avenues, and 6) Minnewawa and Shepherd Avenues for existing conditions, existing-plus-project conditions, near term with project conditions, and cumulative conditions to the year 2046. Each scenario is based on the Projects a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips as determined in the TIA. According to the TIA, the Project would result in 186 trips in the a.m. peak hours of between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and 250 trips in the p.m. peak hours between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., as well as a total of 2,508 daily vehicle trips. Per the TIA, with incorporation of improvements recommended for each scenario, all study intersections will operate at satisfactory LOS levels thus, the Project, will not conflict with the Circulation Element of the 2014 General Plan. Consequently, a lessthan-significant impact would occur. No mitigation measures are required. b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b) ? Significant and Unavoidable Impact. Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) requires that relevant CEQA analysis of transportation impacts be conducted using a metric known as vehicle miles traveled (VMT) instead of level of service (LOS). VMT measures how much actual auto travel (additional miles driven) a proposed project would create on California roads. If the proposed project adds excessive car travel onto our roads, the proposed project may cause a significant transportation impact. Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b)(4) a lead agency has discretion to choose the most appropriate methodology to evaluate a project's VMT, including whether to express the change in absolute terms, per capita, per household or in any other measure. A lead agency may use models to estimate a project's VMT and may revise those estimates to reflect professional judgment based on substantial evidence. Any assumptions used to estimate VMT and any revisions to model outputs should be documented and explained in the environmental document prepared for the project.

On October 17, 2022, the City of Clovis adopted the Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (Guidelines), dated September 15, 2022. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, the City of Clovis has adopted thresholds of significance to determine when a project will have a significant transportation impact based on VMT. The City has developed screening criteria to streamline the analysis for projects that meet certain 51 259
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
criteria. A project will require a detailed VMT analysis unless it meets at least one of the City's five screening criteria^^:
• Small Projects that generate less than 500 vehicle trips per day (i.e., Single-Family Residential developments with less than 53 dwelling units).
• Provision of affordable housing
• Local-serving retail projects with areas of 100,000 square feet and below • Projects located in a High-Quality Transit Area (HQTA) as defined on page 8 of the City's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines
• Project located in low VMT area
The Project does not qualify for the screening criteria; therefore, shall be evaluated per Guidelines thresholds.

The significance thresholds and specific VMT metrics are described on page 10 of the City's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines. Per the City's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, the residential land use impact threshold is 14.1 VMT per capita. The Project will generate 14.9 VMT per capita which is greater than the threshold of 14.1 VMT per capita; therefore, the Project would create a significant transportation impact.

Feasible mitigation measures must be identified to avoid or substantially reduce a significant impact under CEQA. Mitigation of VMT impacts typically requires changes in habits and behaviors of residents. Project design features that encourage mode shift from automobiles to transit or nonmotorized modes can potentially reduce project specific VMT. The potential VMT reduction was estimated using the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association's (CAPCOA) "Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vuinerabiiities, and Advancing Health and Equity - Designed for Local Govemments, Communities, and Project Deveiopers" dated December 2021.

Although the Project would create a significant transportation impact, the project is consistent with the City's General Plan. During preparation of the 2014 General Plan Circulation Element Update, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was prepared, along with a statement of Overriding consideration, that discussed the potential environmental impacts and required mitigation measures to be implemented/followed by all future projects that are consistent with the General Plan. The project will be conditioned to implement and follow these measures.

The City adopted a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the 2014 General Plan Circulation Element Update on October 17, 2022. The SEIR evaluated potential land uses consistent with the General Plan and their associated VMT impacts. The SEIR finds that implementation of the 2014 General Plan may result in VMT metrics that are greater than the applicable thresholds. Mitigation measures include policies to reduce VMT. Because the City cannot demonstrate that the implementation of these policies would achieve VMT reductions to meet the VMT thresholds, the Impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Therefore, following approval of the SEIR, individual land use development projects that are consistent with the 2014 General Plan have the opportunity to tier their environmental review from the General Plan SEIR pursuant to section 15152 of the CEQA Guidelines. The SEIR has disclosed the VMT impacts of land use development consistent with the General Plan. Therefore, significant, and unavoidable VMT impacts associated with the General Plan have already been disclosed. Because the proposed Project is consistent with the 2014 General Plan, the Project's significant transportation impact does not require the preparation of a project specific EIR. Although the Project, has been determined to be consistent with the 2014 General Plan and is tiering from the SEIR, it would remain a significant and unavoidable impact. 13 Transportation Impact Analysis, LSA, October 2024, page 4. 52 260
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project would result in a significant impact if it would include features that would create a hazard such as a sharp curve in a new roadway or create a blind corner or result in sight distance Issues from entryways. Through the entitlement process, the Project would undergo review by multiple City divisions, such as Planning and Engineering, to ensure that the site layout conforms to existing regulations, such as the CMC, and other applicable codes, such as the fire code and building code. During this review, the Project would need to make the necessary corrections to ensure that no hazardous design features would result from the Project. Further, the main roadway network (N. Peach, E. Behymer and N.

Minnewawa Avenues) will be constructed to City roadway standards. Therefore, because the Project would undergo site plan and design review to ensure consistency and adherence to applicable design and site layout guidelines, a less-than-significant impact would occur, and no mitigation measures are required d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Less-Than-Signlficant Impact. The Project would include three (3) ingress/egress access points to the proposed development from E. Behymer Avenue and one (1) ingress/egress access point from the N. Peach alignment. As part of the Project review, the Clovis Fire Department would review all plans to ensure adequate emergency access is provided. This review includes review for adequate roadway widths, turning radii, as well as adequate access to units and accessibility to water. Consequently, because the Project plans would be required by the CMC to be reviewed and approved by Clovis Fire Department and Police Department prior to construction, this impact would be less-than-slgnificant, and no mitigation measures are required.

18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Listed or eiigible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a
local register of historical resources as
defined in Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k)?
X
b. A resource determined by the lead agency,
in Its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision
(c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Section
5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph,
the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California
Native American Tribe?
X
Environmental Setting
On September 25, 2014, Governor Jerry Brown signed Assembly Bill (AB52), which intends to protect a new class of recourse under CEQA. This new class Is Tribal Cultural Resources and provides an avenue to identify Tribal Cultural resources through a consultation process. AB52 applies to all projects where a Notice of 53 261
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006. PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
Determination is filed. Furthermore, the consultation process is required to be complete prior to filing a Notice of Intent.

City staff conducted Native American Consultation in compliance with AB52. In compliance with AB52, invitations for consultation were mailed on July 1, 2024, which affords Native tribes thirty (30) days to respond and to request consultation. During this timeframe, no requests for consultations were received. Additionally, the Cultural Study prepared by Peak & Associates Inc. dated August 2024, included a records search from the CHRIS SSJVIC, which did not identify any tribal resources.

Discussion
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change to a listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
No Impact. See discussion under Section 5a.
b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change to a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a Califomia Native American Tribe? Less-Than-Signlficant Impact With Mitigation. As mentioned above, the City invited three (3) Native American tribes to consult on the Project under AB 52, and no tribes requested consultation within the 30-day period. The Project site is primarily undeveloped and would require trenching and ground-disturbing activities during construction for the installation of utility infrastructure needed to serve the Project. Although no cultural resources were identified at the site, the potential remains that cultural resources could be inadvertently discovered during ground-disturbing activities. However, implementation of Mitigation Measures TCR-1 and TCR-2 below would reduce potential significant impacts and ensure protection in the event of accidental discovery of any cultural resources. With Mitigation Measure TCR-1 and TCR-2, impacts would be less-thansignificant with mitigation.

Mitigation Measure TCR-1: If cultural or archaeological materials are encountered during construction activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find shall halt until a qualified professional archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeologist, can evaluate the significance of the find and make recommendations. Cultural resource materials may include prehistoric resources such as flaked and ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone, ceramics, and fire-affected rock as well as historic resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or structural remnants.

If the qualified professional archaeologist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant cultural resource, additional investigations may be required to mitigate adverse impacts from project implementation. These additional studies may include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or data recovery excavation.

If a potentially eligible resource is encountered, then the qualified professional archaeologist, the Lead Agency, and the project proponent shall arrange for either 1) total avoidance of the resource or 2) test excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if eligible, total data recovery. The determination shall be formally documented in writing and submitted to the Lead Agency as verification that the provisions for managing unanticipated discoveries have been met.
54 262
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
Mitigation Measure TCR-2: if human remains are discovered during construction or operational activities, further excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The specific protocol, guidelines, and channels of communication outlined by the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code (Chapter 1492, Statutes of 1982, Senate Bill 297), and Senate Bill 447 (Chapter 44, Statutes of 1987), shall be followed. Section 7050.5(c) shall guide the potential Native American involvement, in the event of discovery of human remains, at the direction of the County coroner. All reports, correspondence, and determinations regarding the discovery of human remains on the project site shall be submitted to the Lead Agency.

19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
incorporated
Less Than
Significant
impact
No
impact
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
X
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?
X
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider that serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project's projected demand in
addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
X
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity
of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair
the attainment of solid waste reduction
goals?
X
e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
X
Environmental Setting
The electricity and natural gas services in the City of Clovis are provided by PG&E. AT&T/SBC provides telephone service to the City.

The City's water supply sources include groundwater drawn from the Kings Sub-basin of the San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin and surface water from the FID. Surface water is treated at the City of Clovis Surface Water Treatment Facility.

The City of Clovis provides sewer collection service to its residents and businesses. Treatment of wastewater occurs at the Fresno-Clovis Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (RWTP). The Fresno-Ciovis RWTP is 55 263
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
operated and maintained by the City of Fresno and operates under a waste discharge requirement issued by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. Additionally, the City has completed a 2.8 mgd wastewater treatment/water reuse facility, which will service the City's new growth areas.

The FMFCD has the responsibility for storm water management within the Fresno-Clovis metropolitan area of the Project site. Stormwater runoff that is generated by land development is controlled .through a system of pipelines and storm drainage detention basins.

Discussion
a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which couid cause significant environmental effects? Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project includes construction of 266 residential units. As mentioned above, the site is a use previously accounted for in the 2014 Clovis General Plan. Further, as part of the review process for the Project, the wastewater impacts will be evaluated by the City Engineer to ensure compliance with the City's Waste Water Master Plan, as well as FMFCD, so that the Project would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements such that a new ifacility would be required nor would the existing treatment facility need to be expanded. While the Project would introduce new units at this site, the type of development would be consistent with the land use designation and Zone District. Upon review and approval by the City Engineer, the Project would result in a less-than-slgnificant impact. No mitigation measures are required. b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less-Than-Significant impact. The Project is of the type of development previously accounted for the in 2014 Clovis General Plan. The Project will be primarily served through surface water and will be required to purchase water allocation rights through Fresno Irrigation District. Therefore, the Project is anticipated to be adequately served by City water. Further, the Project would comply with current Green Building Codes, as well as the water efficient landscape policies with regards to water conserving features. Lastly, the Project would be required to comply several water conserving policies, such as Policy 3.4 and 3.5 of the Open Space and Conservation Element. Overall, a less-than-slgnificant impact would occur with no mitigation measures c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
Less-Than-Significant impact. Because the Project is of the type previously planned and accounted for in the 2014 Clovis General Plan, it is not likely that the Project would result in a demand that would exceed the capacity of the wastewater treatment facility. Further, the Project is reviewed by the appropriate departments and agencies to ensure compliance and adequate capacity with regard to infrastructure, such as the ability to provide adequate wastewater treatment. Consequently, the impact would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are required. d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less-Than-Significant impact. The Project would introduce new solid waste throughout construction and operation of the Project. However, the Project would be required to comply with Chapter 6.3.1, Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Debris, of the CMC during construction. This section of the CMC 56 264
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
requires that a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of waste tonnage from a project be diverted from disposal, and that all new residential (and commercial) construction within the City shall submit and obtain approval for a waste management plan prior to construction activities. Compliance with these measures would ensure that the Project does not result in a significant impact during the construction phase of the Project. Further, compliance with policies in the General Plan for the reduction and recycling of solid waste would serve to reduce impacts of solid waste by promoting and encouraging the recycling of materials. Lastly, according to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), the City of Clovis has exceeded their target per resident disposal rate of 4.7 pounds per day per resident, meaning that Clovis residents are actually producing less solid waste than the target set by the State.^^ Consequently, a lessthan-significant impact would occur. No mitigation measures are required. e) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Less-Than-Significant. See discussion 19d above.

20. WILDFIRE
if located in or near state responsibility
areas or lands classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
X
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project occupants to,
pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
X
c. Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads,
fuel breaks, emergency water sources,
power lines or other utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or that may result in
temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?
X
d. Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
X
Environmental Setting
The Project site is located on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. The site's topography Is generally flat and characterized somewhat with fruit orchards. 14 Calrecycle, City of
httDs://www2.calrecvcle.ca.QOv/LGCentral/DiversionProaram/JurisdictionDiversionPost2006.

September 30. 2024.

Clovis,
accessed
57 265
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311. R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
Discussion
a) Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project is located at a site that is surrounded by primarily agricultural uses designated for future residential development at varying densities. Although the Project could result in temporary traffic detouring or closures during buiidout, these delays would be temporary and would be coordinated with the City Engineering Division and other departments to ensure safe access to and from the area is maintained. Further, the site itself would be reviewed by City departments to ensure adequate site access and circulation is provided in the event of an emergency. Overall, a less-than-significant impact would occur with no mitigation measures.
b) Would the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, poilutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildifre?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. The general vicinity of the site is flat, therefore, is not of the type of topography nor in a location likely to exacerbate wildfire risks. Additionally, the Project site is located in an area mapped by CAL FIRE as "unzoned" per the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer, indicating the area is not located in an area within State Responsibility Areas into Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Further, the Project would be required to comply with the latest fire codes and would be required to include sprinklers on the interior of the homes and require installation of several hydrants throughout the site. Lastly, the site plans would undergo review by the Clovis Fire Department to ensure that all fire safety regulations are met.

Therefore, a less-than-significant impact would occur with no mitigation measures. c) Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire irsk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Less-Than-Significant Impact. As a new development, installation of a private roadway network, water lines, and power lines would be required; however, these utilities and infrastructure are typical of residential development and would be constructed to standards of the respective agencies and departments which oversee them, as well as be required to comply all necessary plan review and permitting requirements of such departments and agencies. As such, a less-than-significant impact would occur. No mitigation measures are required.
d) Would the project expose people or structures to significant irsks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-ifre slope instability, or drainage changes? Less-Than-Significant Impact. The City of Clovis has generally flat topography, and the site itself is in an area that is not in close proximity to hillsides that would expose people or structures to significant risks associates with downstream flooding or landslides as a result of runoff or post-fire slope instability. As such, a less-than-significant impact would occur.

21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Does the proiect have the potential to X
58 266
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP20244)02, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below selfsustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially
reduce the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal, or
eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed In
connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future prelects)?
X
c. Does the project have environmental effects
that will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
X
Environmental Setting
The Project site is located within the City of Clovis* sphere of influence on a primarily undeveloped site with some orchards, a single-family residence, and accessory buildings. The site's topography is generally flat and characterized somewhat with fruit orchards.

Discussion
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a ifsh or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining leveis, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantiaily reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important exampies of the major periods of Caiifomia history or prehistory? Less-Than-Significant Impact. As discussed throughout the Initial Study, the Project would result in a significant and unavoidable VMT impact. However, during preparation of the General Plan, an EIR was prepared, along with a Statement of Overriding Consideration, that discussed the potential environmental impacts and required mitigation measures to be implemented/followed by all future projects that are consistent with the General Plan. The proposed project would be conditioned to implement and follow these measures.

Therefore, though the proposed project would have a significant and unavoidable transportation impact under CEQA, no further mitigation measure would be required for the project related to VMT. Outside of transportation, the project will not have any Impacts on fish, wildlife, plants, or animal communities. Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact as it would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment.
59 267
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024-006, PDP2024-002, AND TM6482
Initial Study
City OF Clovis
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project includes mitigation measures in certain topic areas identified throughout this Initial Study, which would reduce potential impacts to a less-than-significant level. None of these impacts would be cumulatively considerable since most are either temporary impacts from construction or site specific. With the exception of air quality that is generally considered measurable cumulatively, the Project was found to have a significant and unavoidable impact as discussed in the GHG section of this Initial Study. As such, this Project would be required to comply with those same regulations, ensuring adequate mitigation as development occurs. Lastly, while the Project would introduce 266 new residential units to an existing vacant site, the type of use was previously accounted for In the 2014 Clovis General Plan buildout.

Thus, a less-than-significant impact would occur with no mitigation measures. c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less-Than-Significant impact. As discussed throughout the document, although the Project would result in an increased VMT impact, the integration of mitigation measures as prescribed for all projects consistent with the General Plan will be required. Thus ensuring the Project will not affect human beings either directly or indirectly that would result in an impact that could not be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. Therefore, a less-than-significant Impact would occur. No migration measures are required. 60 268
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

R0311, R2024^06, PDP2024-002, ANDTM6482
Initial Study
City of Clovis
I. Report Preparation
Lead Agency
Marissa Jensen, MA
Assistant Planner
City of Giovis
Pianning & Development Services
Technical Studies
Air Quaiity and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Memorandum
Peach and Behymer Residentiai Project
ISA Associates, Inc.

Bioiogicai Resources Assessment
Peach and Behymer Residential Project
LSA Associates, Inc.

Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis
De Young Peach and Behymer Residential Project
LSA Associates, Inc.

Cultural Resource Assessment
DeYoung Development, City of Ciovis
Melinda A. Peak
Peak & Associates, Inc.

Transportation Impact Analysis
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
LSA Associates, Inc.

California Agricultural LESA Worksheets
De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project
LSA Associates, Inc.
61 269
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
TM6482
Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initiais)
Agriculture and Foresdy Resources
AGR-1 The Project applicant shall prepare or fund an
agricultural resource evaluation prior to project
approval. The resource evaluation shall use
generally accepted methodologies (such as the
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model) to
identify the potentially significant impact of the loss of agricultural land. If the loss of agricultural land is detennined to be a potentially significant impact, the
resource evaluation shall consider the economic
viability of future agricultural use of the property. If the agricultural resource is considered significant
and future agricultural use is considered
economically viable, the conversion will be deemed
significant. The City shall require mitigation by one
of the following methods:
• Mitigation at a 1:1 ration of converted to
preserved acreage through a regional
conservation easement, or payment of its
valuation equivalent if a fee mitigation
program is established. If 1:1 mitigation Is
determined to be economically infeasible,
based upon all of the evidence, the ratio may
be reduced to an economically feasible ratio
or no further mitigation shall be required.

This determination shall be made by the
City's Director of Planning and Development
City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
270
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responslbifity Timing
Verification
(Date and
initials)
Services based upon substantial evidence
in the record; or
• Other potential mitigation which achieves
the same mitigating effect as the measures
identified above, consistent with the CEQA
Statutes and Guidelines. This determination
shall be made by the City's Director of
Planning and Development Services based
upon substantial evidence in the record.

AGR-2 Pursuant to Clovis Municipal Code Section 9.40.170 and the Califomla Civil Code Section 3482.5, prior
to approval of building occupancy permits the
Project developer shall provide residents of the
Project site Right-To-Farm notifications. The RightTo-Farm notification would advise future occupants of the Project site that they are residing adjacent to
agricultural land that has been active for three or
more years and that they should expect continued
activities associated with agricultural production.

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
Air Quality
AIR-1 Consistent with San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Control District (SJVAPCD) Regulation VIII
(Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions), the following controls
are required to be included as specifications for the
proposed project and implemented at the
construction site:

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
271
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Proposed
Mitigatidn Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
initials)
All disturbed areas. Including storage plies,
which are not being actively utilized for
construction purposes, shall be effectively
stabilized of dust emissions using water or
chemical stabilizer/suppressant or covered
with a tarp or other suitable cover or
vegetative ground cover.

All on-slte unpaved roads and off-site
unpaved access roads shall be effectively
stabilized of dust emissions using water or
chemical stabilizer/suppressant.

All land clearing, grubbing, scraping,
excavation, land leveling, grading, cut and
fill, and demolition activities shall be
effectively controlled of fugitive dust
emissions utilizing application of water or by
presoaklng.

When materials are transported off site, all
material shall be covered, or effectively
wetted to limit visible dust emissions, and at
least 6 Inches of freeboard space from the
top of the container shall be maintained.

All operations shall limit or expedltlously
remove the accumulation of mud or dirt from
adjacent public streets at the end of each
workday. (The use of dry rotary brushes Is
expressly prohibited except where preceded
or accompanied bv sufficient wetting to limit
272
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initials)
the visible dust emissions. Use of blower
devices is expressly forbidden).

Following the addition of materials to, or the
removal of materials from, the surface of
outdoor storage piles, said piles shall be
effectively stabilized of fugitive dust
emissions utilizing sufficient water or
chemical stabilizer/suppressant.

Biological Resources
BIO-1 Pre-Activity Surveys for Swainson's Hawk
Nests. If Project activities must occur during the
nesting season (February 15 to August 31), preactivity surveys shall be conducted for Swainson's hawk nests within 14 days prior to the start of
construction. The surveys would be conducted
within the Project site plus a 0.5-mile buffer. The
survey shall be conducted in accordance with the
methodology outlined in existing protocols. Note
that Sawinson's hawks may establish a nest at any
time from February through June; multiple
Swainson's hawks nest surveys may be necessary
in one season at the direction of a qualified biologist, depending on the timing of Project construction. If
no Swainson's hawk nests are found, no further
action is required.

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
BIO-2 Swainson's Hawk Nest Avoidance. If an active
Swainson's hawk nest is discovered at any itme
within 0.5 mile of active construction, a qualified
City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
273
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibiiity Timing
Verification
(Date and
inltiais)
biologist shall complete an assessment of the
potential for current construction activities to impact the nest. The assessment shall consider the type of
construction activities to impact the nest. The
assessment shall consider the type of construction
activities, the location of construction relative to the nest, the visibility of construction activities from the nest location, and other existing disturbances in the
area that are not related to construction activities of this Project. Based on this assessment, the biologist
shall determine if construction activities can
proceed and if nest monitoring will be required. At a
minimum, construction activities shall not occur
within 100 feet of an active nest and shall require
monitoring if within 500 feet of an active nest. These
buffers may need to increase depending on the
sensitivity of the nest location.

BIO-3 Pre-Activity Nesting Bird Surveys. If Project
activities must occur during the nesting season
(February 15 to August 31), pre-activity nesting
bird surveys shall be conducted no more than 7
days prior to the start of construction at the
construction site plus a 250-foot buffer for
songbirds and a 500-foot buffer for raptors (other
than Swainson's hawk). If no active nests are
found, no further action is required; however, note
that nests may become active at any time
throughout the summer, including when
construction activities are occurring. If active nests
are found during the survey or at any time during
274
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibiiity Timing
Verification
(Date and
ihitiais)
Project construction, an avoidance buffer ranging
from 50 feet to 350 feet shall be required, as
determined by a qualified biologist. The avoidance
buffer shall remain in place until the biologist has
determined that the young are no longer reliant on
the nest. Work may occur within the avoidance
buffer under the approval and guidance of the
biologist. The biologist shall have the ability to stop construction If nesting adults show signs of
distress.

Cultural Resources
CULT-1 If archaeological or tribal resources or materials are encountered during construction activities, all work
In the immediate vicinity of the find shall halt until a qualified professional archaeologist, can evaluate
the significance of the find and make
recommendations. Cultural resource materials may
include prehistoric resources such as flaked and
ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone,
ceramics, and fire-affected rock as well as historic
resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or
structural remnants.

If the qualified professional archaeologist
determines that the discovery represents a
potentially significant cultural resource, additional
investigations may be required to mitigate adverse
Impacts from project Implementation. These
additional studies may include avoidance, testing,
and evaluation or data recovery excavation.

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
275
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Proposed
Mitigsrtion Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(pate and
Initiais)
If a potentially-eligible resource is encountered,
then the qualified professional archaeologist, the
Lead Agency, and the project proponent shall
arrange for either 1) total avoidance of the resource
or 2) test excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if
eligible, total data recovery. The determination shall
be formally documented in writing and submitted to
the Lead Agency as verification that the provisions
for managing unanticipated discoveries have been
met.

CULT-2 If human remains are discovered during
construction or operational activities, further
excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited
pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the Califomia Health
and Safety Code and Project shall follow the
procedures and protocols set for un CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.4(e)(1). If human remains
are identified to be those of Native American,
Califomia Health and Safety Code 7050.5 requires
the County coroner notify the NAHC within 24 hours
of discovery. All reports, correspondence, and
determinations regarding the discovery of human
remains on the project site shall be submitted to the
Lead Agency.

City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
Geological Resources
GEO-1
If prehistoric or historic-era cultural materials are
encountered during construction activities, all work
City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
276
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
initials)
in the Immediate vicinity of the find shall halt until a qualified professional archaeologist and/or
paleontologist, can evaluate the significance of the
find and make recommendations. Cultural resource
materials may include prehistoric resources such as
flaked and ground stone tools and debris, shell,
bone, ceramics, and fire-affected rock as well as
historic resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick,
or structural remnants.

If the qualified professional determines that the
discovery represents a potentially significant
cultural resource, additional investigations may be
required to mitigate adverse Impacts from project
Implementation. These additional studies may
Include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or data
recovery excavation.

If a potentially-eligible resource Is encountered,
then the qualified professional archaeologist and/or
paleontologist, the Lead Agency, and the project
proponent shall arrange for either 1) total avoidance
of the resource or 2) test excavations to evaluate
eligibility and, if eligible, total data recovery. The
determination shall be formally documented In
writing and submitted to the Lead Agency as
verification that the provisions for managing
unanticipated discoveries have been met.

Tribal Cultural Resources
TCR-1 If archaeological or tribal resources or materials are encountered during construction activities, all work
City of Clovis Planning Pnorto Permits
and During
Construction
277
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
Initiais)
in the Immediate vicinity of the find shall halt until a qualified professional archaeologist, can evaluate
the significance of the find and make
recommendations. Cultural resource materials may
include prehistoric resources such as flaked and
ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone,
ceramics, and fire-affected rock as well as historic
resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or
structural remnants.

If the qualified professional archaeologist
determines that the discovery represents a
potentially significant cultural resource, additional
investigations may be required to mitigate adverse
impacts from project implementation. These
additional studies may Include avoidance, testing,
and evaluation or data recovery excavation.

If a potentially-eligible resource is encountered,
then the qualified professional archaeologist, the
Lead Agency, and the project proponent shall
arrange for either 1) total avoidance of the resource
or 2) test excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if
eligible, total data recovery. The determination shall
be formally documented in writing and submitted to
the Lead Agency as verification that the provisions
for managing unanticipated discoveries have been
met.

TCR-2 If human remains are discovered during
construction or operational activities, further
excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited
pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health
City of Clovis Planning Prior to Permits
and During
Construction
278
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Proposed
Mitigation Summary of Measure Monitoring
Responsibility Timing
Verification
(Date and
initiais)
and Safety Code and Project shall follow the
procedures and protocols set for un CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.4(e)(1). If human remains
are identified to be those of Native American,
California Health and Safety Code 7050.5 requires
the County coroner notify the NAHC within 24 hours
of discovery. All reports, correspondence, and
determinations regarding the discovery of human
remains on the project site shall be submitted to the
Lead Agency.
279
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

AIR QUALITY AND

GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACT ANALYSIS

PEACH AND BEHYMER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

CITY OF CLOVIS, CALIFORNIA
LSA
October 2024
280
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

AIR QUALITY AND

GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACT ANALYSIS

PEACH AND BEHYMER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

CITY OF CLOVIS, CALIFORNIA
Submitted to:

Juli Kutka
De Young Properties
677 W. Palmdon Drive, #208
Clovis, California 93612
Prepared by:

LSA
2565 Alluvial Avenue, Suite 112
Clovis, California 93611
(559) 490-1210
Project No. 20241700
LSA
October 2024
281
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Grecnhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS i
FIGURES AND TABLES Hi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS Iv
INTRODUCTION 1
Project Location and Description 1
Existing Land Uses In the Project Area 2
BACKGROUND 5
Air Pollutants and Health Effects 5
Ozone 6
Carbon Monoxide 6
Particulate Matter 6
Nitrogen Dioxide 6
Sulfur Dioxide 6
Lead 6
Volatile Organic Compounds 7
Toxic Air Contaminants 7
Greenhouse Gases 11
Carbon Dioxide 12
Methane 13
Nitrous Oxide 13
Hydrofluorocarbons, Perfluorocarbons, and Sulfur Hexafluoride 13 Black Carbon 13
REGULATORY SETTING 15
Air Quality Regulations 15
Federal Regulations 15
State Regulations 15
Regional Regulations 16
Local Regulations 20
Greenhouse Gas Regulatory Setting 20
Federal Regulations 20
State Regulations 21
Regional Regulations 24
Local Regulations 25
SETTING 26
Attainment Status 26
Existing Climate and Air Quality 26
Air Quality Monitoring Results 29
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory 29
Global Emissions 29
United States Emissions 29
State of California Emissions 31
METHODOLOGY 32
P;\20241700 OeYoung Behymer Technlcal\PR0DUCTS\02_AQ_6HG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 282 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air QuAiiTv AND Greenhouse Gas Impact Anaiysis Peach ano Behymer Resioentiai Project October 2024 City of Clovis, Caiifornia LSA
Construction Emissions 32
Construction Health Risk Assessment 32
Operational Emissions 32
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 33
THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE 34
Air Quality 34
Regional Emissions Thresholds 34
Local Microscale Concentration Standards 34
Health Risk Thresholds 35
Greenhouse Gas Thresholds 35
IMPACTS ANALYSIS 36
Air Quality Impacts 36
Consistencywith ApplicableAir Quality Plans 36
Criteria Pollutant Analysis 37
Health Risk on NearbySensitive Receptors 41
Odors 42
Naturally Occurring Asbestos 42
Valley Fever 43
Greenhouse Gas Impacts 43
Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 43
Consistency with Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Plans 47 CONCLUSION 51

APPENDICES
A: CALEEMOD OUTPUT SHEETS
B: HRA MODEL SNAPSHOTS AND OUTPUT
P;\20241700 OeYoung Behymer Techr>ical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx {10/23/2A) 283 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhous£ Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Ciovis, California LSA

FIGURES AND TABLES

FIGURES
Figure 1: Regional Project Location 3
Figure 2: Project Site 4
TABLES
Table A: Sources and Health Effects of Air Pollutants 8 Table B: Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards 9 Table C: Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Gases 12 Table D: San Joaquin Valley Air Basin Air Quality Attainment Status 26 Table E: Ambient Air Quality at Nearby Monitoring Stations 30 Table F: Regional Thresholds for Construction and Operational Emissions 34 Table G: Short-Term Regional Construction Emissions 38
Table H: Project Operational Emissions 40
Table I: Health Risks from Project Construction to Off-Site Receptors 41 Table J: Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions 44
Table K; Project Consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan Key Residential and Mixed-Use Project Attributes that Reduce GHGs 45
P:\20241700 DeVoung Behymer Technicai\PROOUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach artd Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) III 284
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

AtR Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Project
City of Ciovis, California LSA

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
Hg/m3
AAQS
AB
APN
APS
AQMP
BPS
CAA
CAAQS
CalEEMod
CALGreen Code
CAP
CAPCOA
GARB
CARB Handbook
CCAA
CCAP
CEQA
CH4
City
degrees Celsius
degrees Fahrenheit
micrograms per cubic meter
ambient air quality standards
Assembly Bill
Assessor's Parcel Number
Alternative Planning Strategy
Air Quality Management Plan
best performance standard
Federal Clean Air Act
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
California Emissions Estimator Model
California Green Building Standards Code
Climate Action Plan
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association
California Air Resources Board
California Air Resources Board's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook California Clean Air Act
Climate Change Action Plan
California Environmental Quality Act
methane
City of Ciovis
P:\20241700 DeVoung BehvTier Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) IV 285
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air QuAiiTv and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Project
City of Ciovis, California LSA
CO
C02
COie
DPM
EG
EV
Fresno COG
GAMAQI
GHG
GHGRx
GWP
HFC
HI
HRA
HVAC
IPCC
ISR
LED
LESA
MEl
MERV
MMT
MPO
MT
carbon monoxide
carbon dioxide
C02 equivalents
diesel particulate matter
Executive Order
electric vehicles
Fresno Council of Governments
Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts greenhouse gas
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Exchange
Global Warming Potential
hydrofluorocarbon
Hazard Index
Health Risk Assessment
heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Indirect Source Review
light-emitting diode
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
maximum exposed individual
minimum efficiency reporting value
million metric tons
Metropolitan Planning Organization
metric tons
P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technica^PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer • AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 286 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air QuAiiTY AND Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
OCTOSER 2024
Peach and Gehymer Resioentiai Project
City of Clovis, Calieornia LSA
N2O
NAAQS
NO;
NOA
NOx
O3
OEHHA
Pb
RFC
PM
PMio
PM2.5
project
RCM
ROC
ROG
RPS
RTP
SCS
SFe

SJVAPCD
SO2
TAG
TIA
nitrous oxide
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
nitrogen dioxide
naturally occurring asbestos
nitrogen oxides
ozone
California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment lead
perfluorocarbon
particulate matter
particulate matter that is 10 microns or less in diameter particulate matter that is 2.5 microns or less in diameter Peach and Behymer Residential Project
Regulatory Compliance Measure
reactive organic compound
reactive organic gas
Renewables Portfolio Standard
Regional Transportation Plan
SustainableCommunitiesStrategy
sulfur hexafluoride
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
sulfur dioxide
toxic air contaminant
Transportation Impact Analysis
P:\20241700 OeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUaS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.doot (10/23/24) VI 287
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 CiTV OP Clovis, California LSA
UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
VMT vehicle miles traveled
VOC volatile organic compound
P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_ACLGHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer • AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) y j j 288 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quaiity and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Ciovis, California LSA

INTRODUCTION
This Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Impact Analysis has been prepared to evaluate the potential air quality and GHG emissions impacts associated with the Peach and Behymer Residential Project (project) in unincorporated Fresno County, California and proposed to be annexed into the City of Ciovis. This analysis was prepared using methods and assumptions recommended in the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District's (SJVAPCD) Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI).^ This analysis includes a description of the existing regulatory framework, an assessment of project construction and operation period emissions, and an assessment of GHG emissions and energy impacts resulting from the proposed project.

PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The approximately 37-acre project site is located southeast of the intersection of East Behymer Avenue and North Peach Avenue Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) 556-010-28 and 556-01-029, in unincorporated Fresno County. The project site is currently primarily planted with orchards and contains two existing residential units that would be demolished as part of the project. Figure 1 shows the project location, and Figure 2 shows the project's site plan.

The proposed project is located within City's sphere of influence (SOI) and within the northwest urban center growth area. The proposed project would be annexed into the City of Ciovis and would include the construction of a 266-unit single-family residential development. The proposed project would include approximately 0.84 acre of park space. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan. Based on the project's Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), the proposed project is estimated to generate 2,508 average daily trips.^ The proposed project would comply with the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code) building measures. In addition, based on information provided by the Project Applicant, the proposed project would be all-electric and is anticipated to include the following sustainable features^:
• Installation of ENERGY STAR dishwashers, bathroom exhaust fans, water heaters, and windows; • Installation of high-efficiency heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems and programmable thermostats;
• Installation of solar on each residence per CALGreen Code requirements; • Installation of a breaker and wiring for electric vehicles (EV) at each residence; • Installation of cool roof tiles and high-performance, formaldehyde-free Insulation; 1 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). 2015. Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts. March 19. Website: www.valleyalr.org/transportation/ceqaJdx.htm (accessed June 2024).

LSA. 2024. De Young Properties Peach and Behymer Project Transportation Impact Analysis. August.

De Young Properties, 2024. De Young EnergySmart Home Features. Website:
https://deyoungproperties.eom/smart-home/#green-smart (accessed June 2024).

P:\20241700 OeYoung Behymer Technical\PROOUCTS\02_ACLGH6\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 289
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air QuAiiTY ANo Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Resioential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
Installation of minimum efficiency reporting value {MERV)-8 filters; Installation of 100 percent light-emitting diode (LED) lighting; Use of drip irrigation;
Installation of lo\w-flow water fixtures;
Use of low volatile organic compound (VOC) paints;
Recycle up to 90 percent of construction waste; and
Independent inspections at random for energy-efficiency verification.

Construction activities for the project would include demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to begin in 2024. The proposed project would not require the import or export of soil but would include the demolition of approximately 6,500 square feet of existing buildings. Grading, site preparation, and building activities would involve the use of standard earthmoving equipment such as large excavators, cranes, and other related equipment.

EXISTING LAND USES IN THE PROJECT AREA
For the purposes of this analysis, sensitive receptors are areas of the population that have an Increased sensitivity to air pollution or environmental contaminants. Sensitive receptor locations include residences, schools, daycare centers, hospitals, parks, and similar uses that are sensitive to air quality. Impacts on sensitive receptors are of particular concern because those receptors are the population most vulnerable to the effects of air pollution.

The project site is surrounded primarily by agricultural uses with some residential and commercial uses. The areas adjacent to the project site include the following uses:
• North: Existing agricultural uses and a few single-family residences opposite East Behymer Avenue;
• East: Existing agricultural uses and a single-family residence at the southeast corner of the project site;
• South: Existing agricultural uses and a single-family residence at the southeast corner of the project site; and
• West: Existing agricultural uses, vacant land, and a few single-family residences.

The closest sensitive receptors to the project site include single-family residences located approximately 75 feet west of the project site and 100 feet north of the project site.

P:\20241700 OeYoung Behymer Teehnical\PROOUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (XO/23/24) 290 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

AtR Quality and GRtENHOusf Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Project
City of Clovis, California LSA
Figure 1: Regional Project Location
P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 291 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air QuAiiTr and Greenhouse Gas Impact Anaitsis
October 2024
Peach and Behtmer Residential Project
City of Ciovis, California LSA
Figure 2: Project Site
P:\20Z41700DeYoung Behymer Technical\PROOUCTS\02_AQ_GH6\OeYoung Peach and Behymer-AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 292 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality ano Greinhoust Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis. California LSA

BACKGROUND
This section provides current background information on air pollutants and their health effects. It also provides current regulatory background information, including Information from the California Air Resources Board's (GARB) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook'' (GARB Handbook), a description of the general health risks of toxics, and the significance criteria for project evaluation.

AIR POLLUTANTS AND HEALTH EFFECTS
Both State and federal governments have established health-based ambient air quality standards {California Ambient Air Quality Standards [CAAQS] and National Ambient Air Quality Standards [NAAQS], respectively) for six criteria air pollutants:® carbon monoxide (GO), ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), lead (Pb), and suspended particulate matter (PM). In addition, the State has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility-reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. Long-term exposure to elevated levels of criteria pollutants may result in adverse health effects. However, emission thresholds established by an air district are used to manage total regional emissions within an air basin based on the air basin's attainment status for criteria pollutants. These emission thresholds were established for individual projects that would contribute to regional emissions and pollutant concentrations and could adversely affect or delay the projected attainment target year for certain criteria pollutants.

Because of the conservative nature of the thresholds and the basin-wide context of individual project emissions, there is no known direct correlation between a single project and localized air quality-related health effects. One individual project that generates emissions exceeding a threshold does not necessarily result in adverse health effects for residents in the project vicinity. This condition is especially true when the criteria pollutants exceeding thresholds are those with regional effects, such as ozone precursors like nitrogen oxides (NOx) and VOGs.

Occupants of facilities such as schools, daycare centers, parks and playgrounds, hospitals, and nursing and convalescent homes are considered to be more sensitive than the general public to air pollutants because these population groups have increased susceptibility to respiratory disease.

Persons engaged in strenuous outdoor work or exercise also have increased sensitivity to poor air quality. Residential areas are considered more sensitive to air quality conditions, compared to commercial and industrial areas, because people generally spend longer periods of time at their residences, with greater associated exposure to ambient air quality conditions. Recreational uses are also considered sensitive compared to commercial and industrial uses due to greater exposure to ambient air quality conditions associated with exercise.

California Air Resources Board (GARB). 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. April.

Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the federal and State governments have established ambient air quality standards, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health.

P;\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PftOOUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQReport.docx (10/23/24) 293 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Aiit Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behvmer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
Ozone
Rather than being directly emitted, O3 (smog) is formed by photochemical reactions between NOx and VOCs. O3 is a pungent, colorless gas. Elevated ozone concentrations result in reduced lung function, particularly during vigorous physical activity. This health problem is particularly acute in sensitive receptors such as the sick, elderly, and young children. O3 levels peak during the summer and early fall months.

Carbon Monoxide
CO is formed by the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, almost entirely from automobiles. It is a colorless, odorless gas that can cause dizziness, fatigue, and impairments to central nervous system functions. CO passes through the lungs into the bloodstream, where it interferes with the transfer of oxygen to body tissues.

Partlculate Matter
PM is the term used for a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets found in the air. Coarse particles are those that are 10 microns or less in diameter (PMio). Fine, suspended particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5), is not readily filtered out by the lungs. Nitrates, sulfates, dust, and combustion particulates are major components of PMio and PM2.S. These small particles can be directly emitted into the atmosphere as byproducts of fuel combustion; through abrasion, such as tire or brake lining wear; or through fugitive dust (wind or mechanical erosion of soil). They can also be formed in the atmosphere through chemical reactions.

Particulates may transport carcinogens and other toxic compounds that adhere to the particle surfaces and can enter the human body through the lungs.

Nitrogen Dioxide
NO2 is a reddish-brown gas that is a byproduct of combustion processes. Automobiles and industrial operations are the main sources of NO2. Aside from its contribution to ozone formation, NO2 also contributes to other pollution problems, including a high concentration of fine particulate matter, poor visibility, and acid deposition. NO2 may be visible as a coloring component on high pollution days, especially In conjunction with high ozone levels. NO2 decreases lung function and may reduce resistance to infection.

Sulfur Dioxide
SO2 is a colorless, irritating gas formed primarily from incomplete combustion of fuels containing sulfur. Industrial facilities also contribute to gaseous SO2 levels in the region. SO2 irritates the respiratory tract, can injure lung tissue when combined with fine particulate matter, and reduces visibility and the level of sunlight.

Lead
Leaded gasoline (phased out in the United States beginning in 1973), paint (on older houses and cars), smelters (metal refineries), and the manufacture of lead storage batteries have been the primary sources of lead released into the atmosphere. Lead has multiple adverse neurotoxic health effects, and children are at special risk. Some lead-containing chemicals cause cancer in animals.

P:\20241700 DeYoung BehvmerTechntc3i\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYogng Peach and Behymer - AQ Repoft.docx (10/23/24) 294 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
Lead levels in the air have decreased substantially since leaded gasoline was eliminated. Ambient lead concentrations are only monitored on an as-warranted, site-specific basis in California. On October 15, 2008, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) strengthened the NAAQS for lead by lowering it from 1.5 to 0.15 micrograms per cubic meter (pg/m^). The USEPA revised the monitoring requirements for lead in December 2010. These requirements focus on airports and large urban areas, resulting in an increase in 76 monitors nationally.

Volatiie Organic Compounds
VOCs {also known as reactive organic gases [ROGs] and reactive organic compounds [ROCs]) are formed from the combustion of fuels and the evaporation of organic solvents. VOCs are not defined as criteria pollutants, however, because VOCs accumulate in the atmosphere more quickly during the winter, when sunlight is limited and photochemical reactions are slower, they are a prime component of the photochemical smog reaction. There are no attainment designations for VOCs.

Toxic Air Contaminants
In addition to the criteria pollutants discussed above, toxic air contaminants (TACs) are another group of pollutants of concern. TACs are injurious in small quantities and are regulated by the USEPA and the CARB. Some examples of TACs include benzene, butadiene, formaldehyde, and hydrogen sulfide. The identification, regulation, and monitoring of TACs is relatively recent compared to that for criteria pollutants.

TACs do not have ambient air quality standards (AAQS), but are regulated by the USEPA, the CARB, and the SJVAPCD. In 1998, the CARB identified particulate matter from diesel-fueled engines as a TAC. The CARB has completed a risk management process that identified potential cancer risks for a range of activities using diesel-fueled engines.® High-volume freeways, stationary diesel engines, and facilities attracting heavy and constant diesel vehicle traffic (e.g., distribution centers and truck stops) were identified as posing the highest risk to adjacent receptors. Other facilities associated with increased risk include warehouse distribution centers, large retail or industrial facilities, highvolume transit centers, and schools with a high volume of bus traffic. Health risks from TACs are a function of both concentration and duration of exposure.

Unlike TACs emitted from industrial and other stationary sources noted above, most diesel particulate matter (DPM) is emitted from mobile sources—primarily "off-road" sources such as construction and mining equipment, agricultural equipment, and truck-mounted refrigeration units, as well as "on-road" sources such as trucks and buses traveling on freeways and local roadways.

Although not specifically monitored, recent studies indicate that exposure to DPM may contribute significantly to a cancer risk (a risk of approximately 500 to 700 in 1,000,000) that is greater than all other measured TACs combined.'The technology for reducing DPM emissions from heavy-duty trucks is well established, and both State and federal agencies are moving aggressively to regulate engines and emission control systems to reduce and remediate diesel emissions. The CARB anticipated that by CARB. 2000. Stationary Source Division and Mobile Source Control Division. Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles. October.

Ibid.

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_6HG\0eYoung Peach and Behymer • AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 295 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behyuer Residential Project
City of Ciovis, California LSA
2020, average statewide DPM concentrations wiii decrease by 85 percent from levels in 2000 with full implementation of the CARB's Diesel Risk Reduction Plan,® meaning that the statewide health risk from DPM is expected to decrease from 540 cancer cases in 1,000,000 to 21.5 cancer cases in 1,000,000.The CARB 2000 Diesel Risk ReductionPlan is still the most recent version and has not been updated.

Table A summarizes the sources and health effects of air pollutants discussed in this section. Table B presents a summary of CAAQS and NAAQS.

Table A: Sources and Health Effects of Air Pollutants
Pollutants Sources Primary Effects
Carbon
Monoxide (CO)
• Incomplete combustion of fuels
and other carbon-containing
substances, such as motor exhaust
• Natural events, such as
decomposition of organic matter
• Reduced tolerance for exercise
• Impairment of mental function
• Impairment of fetal development
• Death at high levels of exposure
• Aggravation of some heart diseases (angina)
Nitrogen
Dioxide (NO2)
• Motor vehicle exhaust
• High temperature stationary
combustion
• Atmospheric reactions
• Aggravation of respiratory illness
• Reduced visibility
• Reduced plant growth
• Formation of acid rain
Ozone
(O3)
• Atmospheric reaction of organic
gases with nitrogen oxides in
sunlight
• Aggravation of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases • Irritation of eyes
• Impairment of cardiopulmonary function
• Plant leaf injury
Lead
(Pb)
• Contaminated soil ♦ Impairment of blood functions and nerve construction • Behavioral and hearing problems in children
Suspended
Particuiate
Matter
(PM2.5 and
PMio)
• Stationary combustion of solid
fuels
• Construction activities
• Industrial processes
• Atmospheric chemical reactions
• Reduced lung function
• Aggravation of the effects of gaseous pollutants
• Aggravation of respiratory and cardiorespiratory diseases • Increased cough and chest discomfort
• Soiling
• Reduced visibility
Sulfur Dioxide
{S02)
• Combustion of sulfur-containing
fossil fuels
• Smelting of sulfur-bearing metal
ores Industrial processes
• Aggravation of respiratory diseases (asthma, emphysema) • Reduced lung function
• Irritation of eyes
• Reduced visibility
• Plant injury
• Deterioration of metals, textiles, leather, finishes, coatings, etc.

Source: California Air Resources Board (2015).

CARB. 2000. Stationary Source Division and Mobile Source Control Division. Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particuiate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles. October.

P:\20241700 DeYoung BehYrnerTechnical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\0eYoung Peach and Behymer- AQReport.docx (10/23/24) 296 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Proiect
City of Clovis. California LSA
Table B: Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards Pollutant
Averaging
Time
California Standards^ Federal Standards^
Concentration^ Method^ Primary''® Secondary'-' Method^
Ozone
{Os)»
1-Hour 0.09 ppm
(180 pg/m') Ultraviolet
Photometry
-
Same as
Primary
Standard
Ultraviolet
Photometry 8-Hour 0.07 ppm
(137 pg/m')

0.070 ppm
(137 pg/m')
Respirable
Particuiate
Matter
(PMio)»
24-Hour 50 Mg/m'
Gravimetric or Beta
Attenuation
150 pg/m' Same as
Primary
Standard
Inertial
Separation and
Gravimetric
Analysis
Annual
Arithmetic
Mean
20 ug/m' -
Fine
Particuiate
Matter
(PMjs)®
24-Hour -
35 pg/m' Same as
Primary
Standard
Inertial
Separation and
Gravimetric
Analysis
Annual
Arithmetic
Mean
12 pg/m' Gravimetric or Beta
Attenuation 9.0 pg/m"'
Carbon
Monoxide
(CO)
8-Hour 9.0 ppm
(10 mg/m') Non-Dispersive
Infrared
Photometry
(NDIR)
9 ppm
(10 mg/m') -
Non-Dispersive
Infrared
Photometry
(NDIR)
1-Hour 20 ppm
(23 mg/m')
35 ppm
(40 mg/m')
8-Hour
(Lake Tahoe)
6 ppm
(7 mg/m')
- -
Nitrogen
Dioxide
(NOi)"
Annual
Arithmetic
Mean

0.03 ppm
(57 pg/m') Gas Phase
Chemi-luminescence
53 ppb
(100 pg/m^)
Same as
Primary
Standard
Gas Phase
Chemiluminescence 1-Hour 0.18 ppm
(339 pg/m')
100 ppb
(188 pg/m')
Lead
(Pb)«.»
30-Day
Average 1.5 pg/m'
Atomic
Absorption
- -
High-Volume
Sampler and
Atomic
Absorption
Calendar
Quarter
-

1.5 pg/m'
(for certain areas)" Same as
Primary
Standard
Rolling 3-
Month
Average'
-

0.15 pg/m'
Sulfur
Dioxide
(SOt)"
24-Hour 0.04 ppm
(105 ng/m3|
Ultraviolet
Fluorescence

0.14 ppm
(for certain areas)
-
Ultraviolet
Fluorescence;
Spectrophotometry
(Pararosaniline
Method)
3-Hour - -

0.5 ppm
(1300 pg/m')
1-Hour 0.25 ppm
(655 pg/m')
75 ppb
(196 pg/m')"
-
Annual
Arithmetic
Mean
-

0.030 ppm
(for certain areas)"
-
VisibilityReducing
Particles"
8-Hour See footnote 14
Beta Attenuation
and Transmittance
through Filter Tape.

No
Federal
Standards
Sulfates 24-Hour 25 pg/m' Ion Chromatography
Hydrogen
Sulfide 1-Hour 0.03 ppm
(42 pg/m')
Ultraviolet
Fluorescence
Vinyl
Chloride^ 24-Hour 0.01 ppm
(26 pg/m') Gas Chromatography
Source; California Air Resources Board (2016) (Website: https://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf).

Table notes are provided on the following page.

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technlcal\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GH6\0eYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 297 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas (mpact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
^ California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except 8-hour Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (1- and 24-hour}, nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter (PMio, PM^ s, and visibility reducing particles), are values that are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California Ambient Air Quality Standards are listed in the Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations.
^ National standards (other than ozone, particulate matter, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The ozone standard is attained when the fourth highest 8-hour concentration measured at each site in a year, averaged over 3 years, is equal to or less than the standard. For PMio, the 24-hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24-hour average concentration above 150 pg/m^ is equal to or less than one. For PMj.s, the 24-hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over 3 years, are equal to or less than the standard.

Contact USEPA for further clarification and current national policies. ^ Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated. Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr. Most measurements of air quality are to be corrected to a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr; ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume, or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas.
* Any equivalent measurement method which can be shown to the satisfaction of the CAR6 togive equivalent results at or near the level of the air quality standard may be used.
^ National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety to protect the public health. ® National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant.
' Reference method as described by the USEPA. An "equivalent method" of measurement may be used but must have a "consistent relationship to the reference method" and must be approved by the USEPA. ® On October 1, 2015, the national 8-hour ozone primary and secondary standards were lowered from 0.075 to 0.070 ppm. ® On December 14, 2012, the national annual PM2.S primary standard was lowered from 15 pg/m' to 12.0 pg/m®. The existing national 24- hour PM2.Sstandards (primary and secondary) were retained at 35 pg/m®, as was the annual secondary standard of 15 pg/m®. The existing 24-hour PMw standards (primary and secondary) of 150 pg/m® also were retained. The form of the annual primary and secondary standards is the annual mean, averaged over 3 years.

To attain the 1-hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 98"' percentile of the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 100 ppb. Note that the national 1-hour standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the national 1-hour standard to the California standards the units can be converted from ppb to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 100 ppb is identical to 0.100 ppm. " On June 2, 2010, a new 1-hour SO2 standard was established, and the existing 24-hour and annual primary standards were revoked. To attain the 1-hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 99"* percentile of the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 75 ppb. The 1971SO2 national standards (24-hour and annual) remain in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2010 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1971 standards, the 1971 standards remain In effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2010 standards are approved.

Note that the 1-hour national standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm).

To directly compare the 1-hour national standard to the California standard the units can be converted to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 75 ppb is identical to 0.075 ppm.

The CARS has identified lead and vinyl chloride as 'toxic air contaminants' with no threshold level of exposure for adverse health effects determined. These actions allow for the implementation of control measures at levels below the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants.
" The national standard for lead was revised on October 15, 2008, to a rolling 3-month average. The 1978 lead standard (1.5 pg/m® as a quarterly average] remains in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2008 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1978 standard, the 1978 standard remains in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2008 standard are approved.

In 1989, the CARB converted both the general statewide 10-mile visibility standard and the Lake Tahoe 30-mile visibility standard to instrumental equivalents, which are "extinction of 0.23 per kilometer" and "extinction of 0.07 per kilometer" for the statewide and Lake Tahoe Air Basin standards, respectively.

On February 7,2024, the federal annual PM2.5 standard was revised from 12.0 pg/m' to 9.0 pg/m'. "C = degrees Celsius
pg/m' = micrograms per cubic meter
CARB = California Air Resources Board
mg/m' = milligrams per cubic meter
PMio = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.S = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size ppb = parts per billion
ppm = parts per million
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCT$\02_AQ_GHG\0eYoung Peach and Behymer • AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 298 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Qualitv and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behyuer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA

GREENHOUSE GASES
Global climate change is the observed increase in the average temperature of the Earth's atmosphere and oceans in recent decades. The Earth's average near-surface atmospheric temperature rose 0.6 ± 0.2 degrees Celsius (°C) or 1.1 ± 0.4 degrees Fahrenheit (T) in the 20^^ century. The prevailing scientific opinion on climate change is that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities. The increased amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other GHGs are the primary causes of the human-induced component of warming. GHGs are released by the burning of fossil fuels, land clearing, agriculture, and other activities, and lead to an increase in the greenhouse effect.®
GHGs are present in the atmosphere naturally, are released by natural sources, or are formed from secondary reactions taking place in the atmosphere. The gases that are widely seen as the principal contributors to human-induced global climate change are:

CO2
Methane {CH4)
Nitrous oxide (N2O)
Hydrofluorocarbons (MFCs)
Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
Sulfur hexafluoride (SFe)
Over the last 200 years, humans have caused substantial quantities of GHGs to be released into the atmosphere. These extra emissions are increasing GHG concentrations in the atmosphere, and enhancing the natural greenhouse effect, which is believed to be causing global warming. While manmade GHGs include naturally-occurring GHGs such as CO2, methane, and N2O, some gases, like HFCs, PFCs, and SFsare completely new to the atmosphere.

Certain gases, such as water vapor, are short-lived in the atmosphere. Others remain in the atmos phere for significant periods of time, contributing to climate change in the long term. Water vapor is excluded from the list of GHGs above because it is short-lived in the atmosphere and its atmospheric concentrations are largely determined by natural processes, such as oceanic evaporation. For the purposes of this air quality analysis, the term "GHGs" will refer collectively to the six gases listed above.

These gases vary considerably in terms of Global Warming Potential (GWP), which is a concept developed to compare the ability of each GHG to trap heat in the atmosphere relative to another gas. The global warming potential is based on several factors, including the relative effectiveness of a gas to absorb infrared radiation and length of time that the gas remains in the atmosphere The temperature on Earth Is regulated by a system commonly known as the "greenhouse effect." Just as the glass in a greenhouse lets heat from sunlight in and reduces the heat escaping, greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere keep the Earth at a relatively even temperature. Without the greenhouse effect, the Earth would be a frozen globe; thus, although an excess of greenhouse gas results in global warming, the naturally occurring greenhouse effect is necessary to keep our planet at a comfortable temperature.

P:\20241700 OeYoung Behymer Technlcal\PftOOUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 299 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air QuAiiTY and Greenhouse Gas (mpact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Proiect
City of Ciovis, California LSA
{"atmospheric lifetime"). The GWP of each gas is measured relative to carbon dioxide, the most abundant GHG; the definition of GWP for a particular GHG is the ratio of heat trapped by one unit mass of the GHG to the ratio of heat trapped by one unit mass of CO2 over a specified time period.

GHG emissions are typically measured In terms of pounds or tons of CO2 equivalents (C02e). Table C shows the GWP for each type of GHG. For example, SFs is 23,500 times more potent at contributing to global warming than CO2.

Table C: Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Gases
Gas
Atmospheric Lifetime
(Years)
Global Warming Potential
(lOO-Vear Time Horizon)
Carbon Dioxide 50-200 1
Methane 12 28
Nitrous Oxide 114 265
HFC-23 270 12,400
HFC-134a 14 1,300
HFC-152a 1.4 138
PFC: Tetrafluoromethane (CF4) 50,000 6,630
PFC: Hexafluoromethane (CjFe) 10,000 11,100
Sulfur Hexafluoride (SFe) 3,200 23,500
Source; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) {IPCC 2014).

CARB = California Air Resources Board
HFC = hydrofluorocarbons
RFC = perfluorocarbons
The following discussion summarizes the characteristics of the six GHGs and black carbon.

Carbon Dioxide
In the atmosphere, carbon generally exists in its oxidized form, as CO2. Natural sources of CO2 include the respiration (breathing) of humans, animals, and plants, volcanic out gassing, decomposition of organic matter and evaporation from the oceans. Human caused sources of CO2 include the combustion of fossil fuels and wood, waste incineration, mineral production, and deforestation.

Natural sources release approximately 150 billion tons of CO2 each year, far outweighing the 7 billion tons of manmade emissions of CO2 each year. Nevertheless, natural removal processes, such as photosynthesis by land- and ocean-dwelling plant species, cannot keep pace with this extra input of manmade CO2, and consequently, the gas is building up in the atmosphere.

In 2021, total annual CO2 accounted for approximately 81.2 percent of California's overall GHG emissions.^® Transportation is the single largest source of CO2 in California, which is primarily comprised of on-road travel. Electricity production, industrial and residential sources also make important contributions to CO2 emissions in California.

CARB. 2022b. GHGs Descriptions & Sources in California. Website: ww2.arb.ca.gov/ghg-descriptlonssources (accessed June 2024).

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technlcal\PROOUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer • AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 12 300 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Grccnhouse Gas Imract Analysis Peach and Behymer Resiuential Proiect October 2024 City of Ciovis. California LSA
Methane
CH4 is produced when organic matter decomposes in environments lacking sufficient oxygen.

Natural sources include wetlands, termites, and oceans. Decomposition occurring in landfills accounts for the majority of human-generated CH4 emissions in California and in the United States as a whole. Agricultural processes such as intestinal fermentation, manure management, and rice cultivation are also significant sources of CH4 in California. Total annual emissions of CH4 accounted for approximately 9.8 percent of GHG emissions in California in 2021." Nitrous Oxide
N2O is produced naturally by a wide variety of biological sources, particularly microbial action in soils and water. Tropical soils and oceans account for the majority of natural source emissions. Nitrous oxide is a product of the reaction that occurs between nitrogen and oxygen during fuel combustion.

Both mobile and stationary combustion emit N2O, and the quantity emitted varies according to the type of fuel, technology, and pollution control device used, as well as maintenance and operating practices. Agricultural soil management and fossil fuel combustion are the primary sources of human-generated N2O emissions in California. Nitrous oxide emissions accounted for approximately

3.4 percent of GHG emissions in California in 2021."
HydrofluorocarbonS; Perfluorocarbons, and Sulfur Hexafluoride MFCs are primarily used as substitutes for ozone-depleting substances regulated under the Montreal Protocol." PRCs and SFs are emitted from various industrial processes, including aluminum smelting, semiconductor manufacturing, electric power transmission and distribution, and magnesium casting. There is no aluminum or magnesium production in California; however, the rapid growth in the semiconductor industry leads to greater use of PRCs. HFCs, PRCs, and SRe accounted for about

5.6 percent of GHG emissions in California in 2021.^''
Black Carbon
Black carbon is the most strongly light-absorbing component of PM formed by burning fossil fuels such as coal, diesel, and biomass. Black carbon is emitted directly into the atmosphere in the form of PM2.5 and is the most effective form of PM, by mass, at absorbing solar energy. Per unit of mass in the atmosphere, black carbon can absorb one million times more energy than CO2." Black carbon contributes to climate change both directly, such as absorbing sunlight, and indirectly, such as GARB. 2022b. GHGs Descriptions & Sources in California. Website: ww2.arb.ca.gov/ghg-descriptionssources (accessed June 2024).

Ibid.

The Montreal Protocol Is an International treaty that was approved on January 1,1989, and was designated to protect the ozone layer by phasing out the production of several groups of halogenated hydrocarbons believed to be responsible for ozone depletion.

GARB. 2022. op. cit.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2015. Black Garbon, Basic Information. February 14, 2017. Website: 19januarY2017snapshot.epa.gov/www3/airquality/blackcarbon/basic.html (accessed June 2024).

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PROOUCTS\02_AQ_.GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 301 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Proiect October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
affecting cloud formation. However, because black carbon is short-lived in the atmosphere, it can be difficult to quantify its effect on global warming.

Most U.S. emissions of black carbon come from mobile sources (52 percent), particularly from dieselfueled vehicles. The other major source of black carbon is open biomass burning, including wildfires, although residential heating and industry also contribute. The CARB estimates that the annual black carbon emissions in California will be reduced approximately 50 percent below 2013 levels by 2030.^® CARB. 2017b. Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy. March. Website: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ sites/default/files/2020-07/final_SLCP_strategy.pdf (accessed June 2024).

P:\20241700 OeYoung Behymer Technical\PROOUCTS\02_AQ^6HG\OeYoung Peach and Behymer • AQ Reportdocx (10/23/24) ^4 302 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Aia Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Ciovis. California LSA

REGULATORY SETTING

AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS
The USEPA and the CARB regulate direct emissions from motor vehicles. The SJVAPCD is the regional agency primarily responsible for regulating air pollution emissions from stationary sources (e.g., factories) and indirect sources (e.g., traffic associated with new development), as well as monitoring ambient pollutant concentrations.

Federal Regulations
Federal Clean Air Act
The 1970 federal Clean Air Act (CAA) authorized the establishment of national health-based air quality standards and also set deadlines for their attainment. The Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 changed deadlines for attaining national standards as well as the remedial actions required of areas of the nation that exceed the standards. Under the Clean Air Act, State and local agencies in areas that exceed the national standards are required to develop State Implementation Plans to demonstrate how they will achieve the national standards by specified dates.

State Regulations
California Clean Air Act
In 1988, the California Clean Air Act (CCAA) required that all air districts in the State endeavor to achieve and maintain CAAQS for CO, O3, SO2, and NO2 by the earliest practical date. The CCAA provides districts with authority to regulate indirect sources and mandates that air quality districts focus particular attention on reducing emissions from transportation and area-wide emission sources. Each nonattainment district is required to adopt a plan to achieve a 5 percent annual reduction, averaged over consecutive 3-year periods, in district-wide emissions of each nonattainment pollutant or its precursors. A Clean Air Plan shows how a district would reduce emissions to achieve air quality standards. Generally, the State standards for these pollutants are more stringent than the national standards.

California Air Resources Board
The CARB is the State's "clean air agency." The CARB's goals are to attain and maintain healthy air quality, protect the public from exposure to toxic air contaminants, and oversee compliance with air pollution rules and regulations.

Assembly Bill 2588 Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act. Under Assembly Bill (AB) 2588, stationary sources of air pollutants are required to report the types and quantities of certain substances their facilities routinely released into the air. The goals of the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Act are to collect emission data, identify facilities having localized impacts, determine health risks, and notify nearby residents of significant risks.

P;\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PROOUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) ^5 303 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quaiity and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and 8ehymer Residential Project OCTO0ER 2024 City oe Clovis, California LSA
The California Air Resources Board Handbook. The GARB has developed an Air Quality and Land Use Handbook^' which is intended to serve as a general reference guide for evaluating and reducing air pollution impacts associated with new projects that go through the land use decision-making process. According to the GARB Handbook, air pollution studies have shown an association between respiratory and other non-cancer health effects and proximity to high traffic roadways. Other studies have shown that diesel exhaust and other cancer-causing chemicals emitted from cars and trucks are responsible for much of the overall cancer risk from airborne toxics in California. The GARB Handbook recommends that county and city planning agencies strongly consider proximity to these sources when finding new locations for "sensitive" land uses such as homes, medical facilities, daycare centers, schools, and playgrounds.

Land uses that can produce air pollution sources of concern include freeways, rail yards, ports, refineries, distribution centers, chrome plating facilities, dry cleaners, and large gasoline service stations. Key recommendations in the GARB Handbook include taking steps to avoid siting new, sensitive land uses:
• Within 500 feet of a freeway, urban roads with 100,000 vehicles/day or rural roads with 50,000 vehicles/day;
• Within 1,000 feet of a major service and maintenance rail yard; • Immediately downwind of ports (in the most heavily impacted zones) and petroleum refineries; • Within 300 feet of any dry cleaning operation (for operations with two or more machines, provide 500 feet); and
• Within 300 feet of a large gas station (defined as a facility with a throughput of 3.6 million gallons per year or greater).

The GARB Handbook specifically states that its recommendations are advisory and acknowledges land use agencies have to balance other considerations, including housing and transportation needs, economic development priorities, and other quality of life issues.

The recommendations are generalized and do not consider site-specific meteorology, freeway truck percentages, or other factors that influence risk for a particular project site. The purpose of this guidance is to help land use agencies determine when to further examine project sites for actual health risk associated with the location of new sensitive land uses.

Regional Regulations
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
The SJVAPGD Is responsible for controlling emissions primarily from stationary sources. The SJVAPGD maintains air quality monitoring stations throughout the basin. The SJVAPGD, in coordination with the eight county transportation agencies, is also responsible for developing, updating, and GARB. 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. April.

P:\20241700 DeYoung BehymerTechnical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer-AQReport-docx (10/23/24) 304 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas [mpact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
implementing air quality attainment plans for the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB). The SJVAPCD also has roles under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts. The SJVAPCD prepared the GAMAQI to assist lead agencies and project applicants in evaluating the potential air quality impacts of projects in the SJVAB. The GAMAQI provides SJVAPCD-recommended procedures for evaluating potential air quality impacts during the CEQA environmental review process. The GAMAQI provides guidance on evaluating short-term (construction) and long-term (operational) air emissions. The most recent version of the GAMAQI, adopted on March 19, 2015, was used in this evaluation. It contains guidance on the following:
• Criteria and thresholds for determining whether a project may have a significant adverse air quality impact
• Specific procedures and modeling protocols for quantifying and analyzing air quality impacts • Methods to mitigate air quality impacts
• Information for use in air quality assessments and environmental documents, including air quality, regulatory setting, climate, and topography data Current Air Quality Plans. The SJVAPCD is responsible for formulating and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the SJVAB. The main purpose of an AQMP is to bring the area into compliance with federal and State air quality standards. The SJVAPCD does not have one single AQMP for criteria pollutants, rather the SJVAPCD address each criteria pollutant with its own Plan.

The SJVAPCD has the following AQMPs:
2022 Plan for the 2015 8-Hour Ozone Standard
2018 Plan for the 1997, 2006, and 2012 PM2.S Standards
2016 Moderate Area Plan for the 2012 PM2.5 Standard
2016 Plan for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard
2013 Plan for the Revoked 1-Hour Ozone Standard
2007 PMio Maintenance Plan
2004 Revision to the California State Implementation Plan for Carbon Monoxide The SJVAPCD's AQMPs incorporate the latest scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories.

The SJVAPCD's AQMPs included the integrated strategies and measures needed to meet the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS), implementation of new technology measures, and P:\20241700DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GH6\OeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Repoft.dooi (10/23/24) 305 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air QuALirr and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Sehymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
demonstrations of attainment of the 1-hour and 8-hour ozone NAAQS as well as the latest 24-hour and annual PM2,5 standards.

The SJVAPCD's current air quality plans are discussed below.

Ozone Plans. The SJVAPCD's Governing Board approved the 2022 Plan for the 2015 8-hour ozone standard on December 15, 2022. The comprehensive strategy in this plan will reduce NO* emissions by 72 percent by 2037 and will bring the San Joaquin Valley into attainment of USEPA's 2015 8-hour ozone standard as expeditlously as practicable by the 2037 attainment deadline.

Particulate Matter Plans. The SJVAPCD adopted the 2007 PMid Maintenance Plan in September 2007 to assure the SJVAB's continued attainment of the USEPA's PMio standard. The USEPA designated the valley as an attainment/maintenance area for PMio.

The 2008 PM2.5 Plan builds upon the comprehensive strategy adopted in the 2007 Ozone Plan to bring the SJVAB into attainment of the 1997 national standards for PM2.5. The USEPA has identified NO* and SO2 as precursors that must be addressed in air quality plans for the 1997 PM2.5 standards. The 2008 PM2.5 Plan is a continuation of the SJVACPD's strategy to improve the air quality in the SJVAB.

The SJVAPCD prepared the 2012 PM2.5 Plan to bring the San Joaquin Valley Into attainment of the USEPA's most recent 24-hour PM2.S standard of 35 pg/m\ The CARB approved the SJVAPCD's 2012 PM2.S Plan at a public hearing on January 24, 2013. The plan, approved by the SJVAPCD Governing Board on December 20, 2012, will bring the San Joaquin Valley into attainment of USEPA's 1997 PM2.5 standard as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than, December 31, 2020.

The SJVAPCD adopted the 2018 Plan for the 1997, 2006, and 2012 PM2,5 federal standards on November 15, 2018. This plan addresses the USEPA federal 1997 annual PM2.S standard of 15 pg/m^ and 24-hour PMa.s standard of 65 pg/m^ the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard of 35 pg/m^ and the 2012 annual PM2.5 standard of 12 pg/m^. This plan demonstrates attainment of the federal PM2.S standards as expeditiously as practicable.

Rules and Regulations. The SJVAPCD rules and regulations that may apply to the proposed project include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Rule 8011—General Requirements: Fugitive Dust Emission Sources. Fugitive dust regulations are applicable to outdoor fugitive dust sources. Operations, including construction operations, must control fugitive dust emissions in accordance with SJVAPCD Regulation VIII. According to Rule 8011, the SJVAPCD requires the implementation of control measures for fugitive dust emission sources.
• Regulation VIII—Fugitive PMio Prohibitions. Rules 8011-8081 are designed to reduce PMio emissions (predominantly dust/dirt) generated by human activity, including construction and demolition activities, road construction, bulk materials storage, paved and unpaved roads, and P:\20241700 OeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.doc* (10/23/24) 306 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City or Ciovis, California LSA
carryout and track out. All development projects that Involve soil disturbance are subject to at least one provision of the Regulation VIII series of rules. • Rule 2201—New and Modified Stationary Source Review Rule. This rule provides the review of new and modified stationary sources of air pollution to operate without interfering with the attainment or maintenance of ambient air quality standards and results in no net increase in emissions above specified thresholds.
• Rule 4102—Nuisance. The purpose of this rule is to protect the health and safety of the public, and applies to any source operation that emits or may emit air contaminants or other materials. • Rule 4601—Architectural Coatings. The purpose of this rule is to limit VOC emissions from architectural coatings. Emissions are reduced by limits on VOC content and providing requirements on coatings storage, cleanup, and labeling. • Rule 4901—Wood Burning Fireplaces and Wood Burning Heaters. The purpose of this rule Is to limit emissions of carbon monoxide and particulate matter from wood burning fireplaces, wood burning heaters, and outdoor wood burning devices.
• Rule 9510—Indirect Source Review. This rule reduces the impact of NOx and PMio emissions from new development projects. The rule places application and emission reduction requirements on development projects meeting applicability criteria in order to reduce emissions through on-site mitigation, off-site SJVAPCD-administered projects, or a combination of the two. Compliance with SJVAPCD Rule 9510 reduces emissions impacts through incorporation of on-site measures as well as payment of an off-site fee that funds emission reduction projects in the SJVAB. The emissions analysis for Rule 9510 is detailed and is dependent on the exact project design that is expected to be constructed or installed.

Compliance with Rule 9510 is separate from the CEQA process, though the control measures used to comply with Rule 9510 may be used to mitigate significant air quality impacts.

Fresno County Association of Governments
Fresno Council of Governments (Fresno COG) is responsible for regional transportation planning in Fresno County and participates in developing mobile source emission inventories used in air quality attainment plans. Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs) are State-mandated plans that identify longterm transportation needs for a region's transportation network. Fresno COG's 2022 RTP charts the iong-range vision of regional transportation in Fresno county through the year 2042. The RTP Identifies existing and future transportation related needs, while considering all modes of travel, analyzing alternative solutions, and identifying priorities for the anticipated available funding for the 1,100 projects and multiple programs included within it. Senate Bill (SB) 375, which went into effect In 2009, added statutes to the California Government Code to encourage planning practices that create sustainable communities. It calls for each metropolitan planning organization to prepare a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) as an integrated element of the RTP that is to be updated every four years. The SCS is intended to show how integrated land use and transportation planning can lead to lower GHG emissions from autos and light trucks. Fresno COG has included the SCS in its 2022 RTP.

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymef Technical\PROOUaS\02_Aq_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer • AQ Report.doex (10/23/24) ig 307 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Am Quality amd Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach ano Behymer Resioential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
Local Regulations
City of Clovis General Plan
The City of Clovis (City) addresses air quality in the Air Quality Element of the General Plan. The Air Quality Element provides goals, policies, and action items that work to meet or exceed all State and federal air quality standards. Applicable air quality policies and action items from the Air Quality Element are listed below.
• Policy 1.1: Land use and transportation. Reduce greenhouse gas and other local pollutant emissions through mixed use and transit-oriented development and well-designed transit, pedestrian, and bicycle systems.
• Policy 1.3: Construction activities. Encourage the use of best management practices during construction activities to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants as outlined by the SJVAPCD. • Policy 1.6: Alternative fuel infrastructure. Encourage public and private activity and employment centers to incorporate electric charging and alternative fuel stations. • Policy 1.8: Trees. Maintain or plant trees where appropriate to provide shade, absorb carbon, Improve oxygenation, slow stormwater runoff, and reduce the heat island effect. • Policy 2.1: Regional coordination. Support regional efforts to reduce air pollution (criteria air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions) and collaborate with other agencies to improve air quality at the emission source and reduce vehicle miles traveled. • Policy 2.6: Innovative mitigation. Encourage innovative mitigation measures to reduce air quality impacts by coordinating with the SJVAPCD, project applicants, and other Interested parties.

GREENHOUSE GAS REGULATORY SETTING
This section describes regulations related to GHGs at the federal, State, and local level.

Federal Regulations
The United States has historically had a voluntary approach to reducing GHG emissions. However, on April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the USEPA has the authority to regulate CO2 emissions under the CAA.

While there currently are no adopted federal regulations for the control or reduction of GHG emissions, the USEPA commenced several actions in 2009 to implement a regulatory approach to global climate change, including the 2009 USEPA final rule for mandatory reporting of GHGs from large GHG emission sources in the United States. Additionally, the USEPA Administrator signed an endangerment finding action in 2009 under the CAA, finding that seven GHGs (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, NF3, PRCs, and SFe) constitute a threat to public health and welfare, and that the combined emissions from motor vehicles cause and contribute to global climate change, leading to national GHG emission standards.

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PROOUCTS\02_AQ.GH6\DeYoung Peach and Behymer • AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 20 308 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymeh Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
State Regulations
The CARB is the lead agency for Implementing climate change regulations in the State. Since its formation, the CARB has worked with the public, the business sector, and local governments to find solutions to California's air pollution problems. Key efforts by the State are described below.

Assembly Bill 32 (2006), California Global Warming Solutions Act California's major initiative for reducing GHG emissions is AB 32, passed by the State legislature on August 31, 2006. This effort alms at reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The CARB has established the level of GHG emissions in 1990 at 427 million metric tons (MMT) of C02e. The emissions target of 427 MMT requires the reduction of 169 MMT from the State's projected business-as-usual 2020 emissions of 596 MMT. AB 32 requires the CARB to prepare a Scoping Plan that outlines the main State strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline and to reduce GHGs that contribute to global climate change. The Scoping Plan was approved by the CARB on December 11, 2008, and contains the main strategies California will implement to achieve the reduction of approximately 169 MMT C02e, or approximately 30 percent, from the State's projected 2020 emissions level of 596 MMT C02e under a business-as-usual scenario (this is a reduction of 42 MMT C02e, or almost 10 percent from 2002-2004 average emissions). The Scoping Plan also includes CARB-recommended GHG reductions for each emissions sector of the State's GHG inventory. The Scoping Plan calls for the largest reductions in GHG emissions to be achieved by implementing the following measures and standards:
• Improved emissions standards for light-duty vehicles (estimated reductions of 31.7 MMT C02e); • The Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (15.0 MMT C02e);
• Energy efficiency measures in buildings and appliances and the widespread development of combined heat and power systems (26.3 MMT C02e); and
• A renewable portfolio standard for electricity production (21.3 MMT C02e).

The CARB approved the First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan on May 22, 2014. The First Update identifies opportunities to leverage existing and new funds to further drive GHG emission reductions through strategic planning and targeted low carbon investments. The First Update defines CARB climate change priorities until 2020, and also sets the groundwork to reach long-term goals set forth in EOs S-3-05 and B-16-2012. The Update highlights California's progress toward meeting the "near-term" 2020 GHG emission reduction goals as defined in the initial Scoping Plan. It also evaluates how to align the State's "longer-term" GHG reduction strategies with other State policy priorities for water, waste, natural resources, clean energy, transportation, and land use.

CARB released a second update to the Scoping Plan, the 2017 Scoping Plan,^® to reflect the 2030 target set by EO B-30-15 and codified by SB 32.

CARB. 2017a. California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. November.

P:\20241700 DeYoung BehymerTechnical\PROOUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer- AQReport.docx (10/23/24) 21 309 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Aia Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach ano Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
Most recently, the 2022 Scoping Plan^® was approved in December 2022 and assesses progress towards achieving the SB 32 2030 target and lay out a path to achieve carbon neutrality no later than 2045. The 2022 Scoping Plan focuses on outcomes needed to achieve carbon neutrality by assessing paths for clean technology, energy deployment, natural and working lands, and others, and is designed to meet the State's long-term climate objectives and support a range of economic, environmental, energy security, environmental justice, and public health priorities.

Senofe Bill 375 (2008)
Signed into law on October 1, 2008, SB 375 supplements GHG reductions from new vehicle technology and fuel standards with reductions from more efficient land use patterns and improved transportation. Under the law, the CARB approved GHG reduction targets in February 2011 for California's 18 federally designated regional planning bodies, known as Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs). The CARB may update the targets every 4 years and must update them every 8 years. MPOs, in turn, must demonstrate how their plans, policies, and transportation investments meet the targets set by the CARB through SCSs. The SCSs are included with the Regional Transportation Plan, a report required by State law. However, if an MPO finds that its SCS will not meet the GHG reduction target, it may prepare an Alternative Planning Strategy (APS). The APS identifies the impediments to achieving the targets.

Executive Order B-30-15 (2015)
Governor Jerry Brown signed Executive Order (EO) B-30-15 on April 29, 2015, which added the immediate target of:
• GHG emissions should be reduced to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.

All State agencies with jurisdiction over sources of GHG emissions were directed to implement measures to achieve reductions of GHG emissions to meet the 2030 and 2050 targets. CARB was directed to update the AB 32 Scoping Plan to reflect the 2030 target, and therefore, is moving forward with the update process. The mid-term target is critical to help frame the suite of policy measures, regulations, planning efforts, and investments in clean technologies and Infrastructure needed to continue reducing emissions.

Senate Bill 350 (2015) Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act SB 350, signed by Governor Jerry Brown on October 7, 2015, updates and enhances AB 32 by introducing the following set of objectives in clean energy, clean air, and pollution reduction for 2030:
• Raise California's renewable portfolio standard from 33 percent to 50 percent; and • Increasing energy efficiency in buildings by 50 percent by the year 2030.

The 50 percent renewable energy standard will be implemented by the CPUC for the private utilities and by the CEC for municipal utilities. Each utility must submit a procurement plan showing it will CARB. 2021. 2022 Scoping Plan Update. May 10. Website: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/ 2022-12/2022-sp.pdf (accessed June 2024).

P;\20241700 DeVoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ^GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQfieport.docx (10/23/24) 22 310 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality ano Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Proiect October 2024 City of Ciovis. California LSA
purchase clean energy to displace other non-renewable resources. The 50 percent Increase in energy efficiency in buildings must be achieved through the use of existing energy efficiency retrofit funding and regulatory tools already available to state energy agencies under existing law. The addition made by this legislation requires State energy agencies to plan for and implement those programs in a manner that achieves the energy efficiency target.

Senate Bill 32, California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2016, and Assembly Bill 197 In summer 2016 the Legislature passed, and the Governor signed, SB 32, and AB 197. SB 32 affirms the importance of addressing climate change by codifying into statute the GHG emissions reductions target of at least 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 contained in Governor Brown's April 2015 EO B-30-15. SB 32 builds on AB 32 and keeps us on the path toward achieving the State's 2050 objective of reducing emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels, consistent with an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) analysis of the emissions trajectory that would stabilize atmospheric GHG concentrations at 450 parts per million C02e and reduce the likelihood of catastrophic impacts from climate change.

The companion bill to SB 32, AB 197, provides additional direction to CARB related to the adoption of strategies to reduce GHG emissions. Additional direction in AB 197 meant to provide easier public access to air emissions data that are collected by CARB was posted in December 2016.

Senate Bill 100
On September 10, 2018, Governor Brown signed SB 100, which raises California's Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) requirements to 60 percent by 2030, with interim targets, and 100 percent by 2045. The bill also establishes a State policy that eligible renewable energy resources and zerocarbon resources supply 100 percent of all retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers and 100 percent of electricity procured to serve all State agencies by December 31, 2045. Under the bill, the State cannot increase carbon emissions elsewhere in the western grid or allow resource shuffling to achieve the 100 percent carbon-free electricity target.

Executive Order B-55-18
EO B-55-18, signed September 10, 2018, sets a goal "to achieve carbon neutrality as soon as possible, and no later than 2045, and achieve and maintain net negative emissions thereafter." EO B-55-18 directs CARB to work with relevant State agencies to ensure future Scoping Plans identify and recommend measures to achieve the carbon neutrality goal. The goal of carbon neutrality by 2045 is in addition to other statewide goals, meaning not only should emissions be reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050, but that, by no later than 2045, the remaining emissions be offset by equivalent net removals of COze from the atmosphere, including through sequestration in forests, soils, and other natural landscapes.

Assembly Bill 1279
AB 1279 was signed in September of 2022, and codifies the State goals of achieving net carbon neutrality by 2045 and maintaining net negative GHG emissions thereafter. This bill also requires California to reduce statewide GHG emissions by 85 percent compared to 1990 levels by 2045 and directs CARB to work with relevant state agencies to achieve these goals.

P;\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRO0UCTS\02_AQ_GHG\0eYoong Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.doc* (XO/23/24) 23 311 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Am Quality and Greenhouse Gas Imract Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
Executive Order N-79-20
EO N-79-20, which was signed by the Governor on September 23, 2020, sets the following goals for the State: 100 percent of in-state sales of new passenger cars and trucks shall be zero-emission by 2035; 100 percent of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles in the State shall be zero-emission by 2045 for all operations where feasible and by 2035 for drayage trucks; and 100 percent of off-road vehicles and equipment in the State shall be zero-emission by 2035, where feasible.

Regional Regulations
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
Tulare County is located within the SJVAB, which is under the jurisdiction of theSJVAPCD. The SJVAPCD has regulatory authority over certain stationary and industrial GHG emission sources and provides voluntary technical guidance on addressing GHGs for other emission sources in a CEQA context. SJVAPCD Initiatives related to GHGs are described below:

Climate Change Action Plan. The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) was adopted on August 21, 2008. The CCAP includes suggested best performance standards (BPS) for proposed development projects. However, the SJVAPCD's CCAP was adopted in 2009 and was prepared based on the State's 2020 GHG targets, which are now superseded by State policies (I.e., the 2022 CALGreen Code) and the 2030 GHG targets, established in SB 32.

San Joaquin Valley Carbon Exchange and Rule 2301. The SJVAPCD initiated work on the San Joaquin Valley Carbon Exchange in November 2008. The Exchange was implemented with the adoption of Amendments to Rule 2301 Emission Reduction Credit Banking on January 19, 2012. The purpose of the carbon exchange is to quantify, verify, and track voluntary GHG emissions reductions generated within the San Joaquin Valley.

The SJVAPCD incorporated a method to register voluntary GHG emission reductions with amendments to Rule 2301. The purposes of the amendments to the rule include the following:

Provide an administrative mechanism for sources to bank voluntary GHG emission reductions for later use
• Provide an administrative mechanism for sources to transfer banked GHG emission reductions to others for any use
• Define eligibility standards, quantitative procedures, and administrative practices to ensure that banked GHG emission reductions are real, permanent, quantifiable, surplus, and enforceable The SJVAPCD is participating in a new program developed by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) to encourage banking and use of GHG reduction credits referred to as the CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Exchange (GHGRx). The GHGRx provides information on GHG credit projects within participating air districts. The SJVAPCD is one of the first districts to have offsets available for trading on the GHGRx.

P:\20241700 DeVoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 24 312 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality ano Grecnhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City op Clovis, California LSA
Local Regulations
City of Clovis
The City of Clovis General Plan provides goals, policies, and action items that work to meet or exceed all current and future state-mandated targets for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.

The following policies and action items from the General Plan, listed below, would be applicable to the proposed project.
• Policy 1.1: Land use and transportation. Reduce greenhouse gas and other local pollutant emissions through mixed use and transit-oriented development and well-designed transit, pedestrian, and bicycle systems.
• Policy 1.6: Alternative fuel infrastructure. Encourage public and private activity and employment centers to incorporate electric charging and alternative fuel stations. • Policy 2.1: Regional coordination. Support regional efforts to reduce air pollution (criteria air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions) and collaborate with other agencies to improve air quality at the emission source and reduce vehicle miles traveled. • Policy 2.2: Cross-jurisdictional issues. Collaborate with regional agencies and surrounding Jurisdictions to address cross-jurisdictional transportation and air quality issues. • Policy 2.3: Valleywide programs. Establish parallel air quality programs and implementation measures with other communities across the San Joaquin Valley. • Policy 2.4: Public participation. Encourage participation of local citizens, the business community, and interested groups and individuals in air quality planning and implementation. • Policy 2.6: Innovative mitigation. Encourage innovative mitigation measures to reduce air quality impacts by coordinating with the SJVAPCD, project applicants, and other interested parties.

P;\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technlca^PR0DUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report-docx (10/23/24) 25 313 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Project
City of Clovis, California LSA

SETTING
This section provides the current SJVAPCD attainment status, climate and air quality, ambient air quality monitoring results, and GHG emissions inventory.

ATTAINMENT STATUS
The CARB is required to designate areas of the state as attainment, nonattainment, or unclassified for all State standards. An attainment designation for an area signifies that pollutant concentrations did not violate the standard for that pollutant in that area. A nonatto/nment designation indicates that a pollutant concentration violated the standard at least once, excluding those occasions when a violation was caused by an exceptional event, as defined in the criteria. An unclassified designation signifies that data do not support either an attainment or nonattainment status. The CCAA divides districts into moderate, serious, and severe air pollution categories, with increasingly stringent control requirements mandated for each category.

The USEPA designates areas for O3, CO, and NO2 as either does not meet the primary standards, or cannot be classified, or better than national standards. For SO2, areas are designated as does not meet the primary standards, does not meet the secondary standards, cannot be classified, or better than national standards.

Table D provides a summary of the attainment status for the SJVAB with respect to NAAQS and CAAQS.

Table D: San Joaquin Valley Air Basin Air Quality Attainment Status Pollutant State Federal
Ozone (1-hour) Severe/Nonattainment Not Applicable
Ozone {8-hour) Nonattainment Extreme Nonattainment
Pf^io Nonattainment Attainment (Maintenance)
PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment
Carbon Monoxide Attainment Attainment (Maintenance)
Nitrogen Dioxide Attainment Unclassified/Attainment
Lead Attainment Unclassified/Attainment
Sulfur Dioxide Attainment Unclassified
Sulfates Attainment No Federal Standard
Hydrogen Sulfide Unclassified No Federal Standard
Source: California Air Resources Board and USEPA (2023).

PMio = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.S = particulate matter less than 2,5 microns in size

EXISTING CLIMATE AND AIR QUALITY
Air quality is a function of both local climate and local sources of air pollution. The amount of a given pollutant in the atmosphere is determined by the amount of the pollutant released and the atmosphere's ability to transport and dilute the pollutant. The major determinants of transport and dilution are wind, atmospheric stability, terrain, and for photochemical pollutants, sunshine.

P;\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYour>g Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.doc* (10/23/24) 26 314 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Grccnhousc Ga$ Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Resiocntiai Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
The project site is located within the SJVAB and is under the jurisdiction of the SJVAPCD. A region's topographic features have a direct correlation with air pollution flow and therefore are used to determine the boundary of air basins. The SJVAB is comprised of approximately 25,000 square miles and covers of eight counties Including Fresno, Kings, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus and Tulare, and the western portion of Kern. The SJVAB Is defined by the Sierra Nevada mountains in the east (8,000 to 14,000 feet in elevation), the Coast Ranges in the west (averaging 3,000 feet in elevation), and the Tehachapi mountains in the south (6,000 to 8,000 feet in elevation). The valley is basically flat with a slight downward gradient to the northwest. The valley opens to the sea at the Carquinez Straits where the San Joaquin-Sacramento Delta empties into San Francisco Bay.

An aerial view of the SJVAB would simulate a "bowl" opening only to the north. These topographic features restrict air movement through and out of the basin.

Although marine air generally flows into the basin from the San Joaquin River Delta, the Coast Range hinders wind access into the SJVAB from the west, the Tehachapi Mountains prevent southerly passage of air flow, and the high Sierra Nevada range is a significant barrier to the east. These topographic features result in weak air flow which becomes blocked vertically by high barometric pressure over the SJVAB. As a result, the SJVAB is highly susceptible to pollutant accumulation over time. Most of the surrounding mountains are above the normal height of summer inversion layers (1,500 to 3,000 feet).

Local climatological effects, including wind speed and direction, temperature, inversion layers, precipitation and fog, can exacerbate the air quality in the SJVAB. Wind speed and direction play an important role in dispersion and transport of air pollutants. Wind at the surface and aloft can disperse pollution by mixing vertically and by transporting it to other locations. For example, in the summer, wind usually originates at the north end of the SJVAB and flows in a south-southeasterly direction through the SJVAB, through Tehachapi pass, into the Southeast Desert Air Basin. In the winter, wind direction is reversed and flows in a north-northwesterly direction. In addition to the seasonal wind flow, a sea breeze flows into SJVAB during the day and a land breeze flowing out of the SJVAB at night. The diversified wind flow enhances the pollutant transport capability within SJVAB.

The annual average temperature varies throughout the SJVAB, ranging from the low 40s to high 90s, measured in degrees Fahrenheit {"F). With a more pronounced valley influence, inland areas show more variability in annual minimum and maximum temperatures than coastal areas. The climatological station closest to the site is the Fresno Yosemite International Airport Station (043257). The monthly average maximum temperature recorded at this station from January 1948 to June 2016 ranged from 54.6*'F in January to 98.3°F in July, with an annual average maximum of

76.5''F. The monthly average minimum temperature recorded at this station ranged from 35.3''F In December to 65.7''F in July, with an annual average minimum of 50.4''F.^° These levels are still Western Regional Climate Center, n.d. Fresno Yosemite International Airport (043257), Period of Record Monthly Climate Summary. Website: https://wrcc,dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca32S7 (accessed January 2023).

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 27 315 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Am Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
representative of the project area. January and December are typically the coldest months and July is typically the warmest month In this area of the SJVAB.

The majority of annual rainfall In the SJVAB occurs between November and March. Summer rainfall is minimal and is generally limited to scattered thundershowers in desert regions and slightly heavier showers near the lower portion of the SJVAB and along the Sierra Nevada mountains to the east. Average monthly rainfall during that period varied from 0.01 inches in July and August to 2.09 inches in January, with an annual total of 10.89 inches.^^ Patterns in monthly and yearly rainfall totals are predictable due to the recognizable differences in seasons within the valley.

The vertical dispersion of air pollutants in the SJVAB Is limited by the presence of persistent temperature inversions. Because of cooling of the atmosphere, air temperature usually decreases with altitude. A reversal of this atmospheric state, where the air temperature Increases with height, is termed an inversion. Inversions can exist at the surface, or at any height above the ground. The height of the base of the inversion Is known as the "mixing height." This Is the level within which pollutants can mix vertically. Air above and below the Inversion base does not mix because of the differences in air density. Semi-permanent systems of high barometric pressure fronts frequently establish themselves over the SJVAB, preventing low pressure systems that might otherwise bring rain and winds that clean the air.

Inversion layers are significant in determining ozone formation, and CO and PMio concentrations.

Ozone and Its precursors will mix and react to produce higher ozone concentrations under an Inversion. The Inversion will also simultaneously trap and hold directly emitted pollutants such as carbon monoxide. PMio is both directly emitted and created in the atmosphere as a chemical reaction. Concentration levels of pollutants are directly related to Inversion layers due to the limitation of mixing space.

Surface or radiation inversions are formed when the ground surface becomes cooler than the air above it during the night. The earth's surface goes through a radiative process on clear nights, where heat energy is transferred from the ground to a cooler night sky. As the earth's surface cools during the evening hours, the air directly above It also cools, while air higher up remains relatively warm. The inversion is destroyed when heat from the sun warms the ground, which in turn heats the lower layers of air; this heating stimulates the ground level air to float up through the inversion layer.

The combination of stagnant wind conditions and low inversions produces the greatest pollutant concentrations. On days of no inversion or high wind speeds, ambient air pollutant concentrations are lowest. Periods of low Inversions and low wind speeds are conditions favorable to high concentrations of CO and PMio. In the winter, the greatest pollution problems are CO and NO* because of extremely low inversions and air stagnation during the night and early morning hours. In Western Regional Climate Center, n.d. Fresno Yosemite International Airport (043257), Period of Record Monthly Climate Summary. Website: https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl7ca3257 (accessed January 2023),
P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRO0UCTS\02_AQ_6HG\0eYoung Peach and Behymer • AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 28 316 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quaiitv ano Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 202A City of Ciovis, California LSA
the summer, the longer daylight hours and the brighter sunshine combine to cause a reaction between hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen to form photochemical smog.

AIR QUALITY MONITORING RESULTS
Air quality monitoring stations are located throughout the nation and are maintained by the local air pollution control district and State air quality regulating agencies. The SJVAPCD, together with the CARB, maintains ambient air quality monitoring stations in the SJVAB. The air quality monitoring stations closest to the project area are located at 908 North Villa Avenue in Ciovis and 3727 North First Street in Fresno, California.

Pollutant monitoring results for years 2021 to 2023 at the nearby ambient air quality monitoring stations, shown in Table E, indicate that air quality in the area has generally been moderate. As indicated in the monitoring results, the State PMio standard was exceeded 111 times in 2021, 73 times in 2022 and an unknown number of times in 2023. In addition, the federal PMio standard was exceeded an unknown number of times in 2021 but not exceeded in 2022 or 2023. The federal PM2.5 standard had 22 exceedances in 2021, four exceedances in 2022, and no exceedances in 2023. The State 1-hour ozone standard was exceeded six times in 2021, no times in 2022, and an unknown number of times in 2023. The State 8-hour ozone standard was exceeded 37 times in 2021, 26 times in 2022, and 21 times in 2023. The federal 8-hour standard was exceeded 34 times in 2021, 23 times in 2022, and 21 times in 2023. The CO, NO2, and SO2 standards were not exceeded in this area during the 3-year period.

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
An emissions inventory that identifies and quantifies the primary human-generated sources and sinks of GHGs is a well-recognized and useful tool for addressing climate change. This section summarizes the latest information on global. United States, and California GHG emission inventories.

Global Emissions
Worldwide emissions of GHGs in 2020 totaled 22.9 billion metric tons (MT) of C02e. Global estimates are based on country Inventories developed as part of the programs of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.^^
United States Emissions
In 2022, the year for which the most recent data are available, the United States emitted about 6,343.2 MMT C02e. Overall, net emissions increased by 1.3 percent from 2021 to 2022 and decreased by 16.7 percent from 2005 levels. The increase in total GHG emissions was driven by an increase In CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2021. GHG Data from UNFCCC.

Website: unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/transparency-and-reporting/greenhouse-gas-data/ghg-dataunfccc/ghg-data-from-unfccc (accessed April 2024).

P:\20241700 0eYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_ACl_GH6\0eVoung Peach and Behymer-AQ Report.doc* (10/23/24) 29 317 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhousc Gas (mpact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Proiect
City of Ciovis, California LSA
Table E: Ambient Air Quality at Nearby Monitoring Stations Pollutant Standard 2021 2022 2023
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Maximum 1-hour concentration (ppm) 1.3 1.3 1.5
Number of days exceeded: State: > 20 ppm 0 0 0
Federal: > 35 ppm 0 0 0
Maximum 8-hour concentration (ppm) 1.2 1.1 1.3
Number of days exceeded: State: > 9 ppm 0 0 0
Federal: > 9 ppm 0 0 0
Ozone (O3)
Maximum 1-hour concentration (ppm) 0.123 0.109 0.102
Number of days exceeded: State: > 0.09 ppm 6 0 ND
Maximum 8-hour concentration (ppm) 0,100 0.084 0.083
Number of days exceeded: State: > 0.07 ppm 37 26 21
Federal: >0.07 ppm 34 23 21
Coarse Particulates (PMio)
Maximum 24-hour concentration (pg/m^) 208.8 127.0 104.0 Number of days exceeded: State: > SO pg/m' 111 73 ND
Federal: > 150 pg/m^ ND 0 0
Annual arithmetic average concentration (pg/m^) 43.2 36.2 ND Exceeded for the year: State: > 20 pg/m^ Yes Yes ND
Federal: > 50 pg/m^ No No ND
Fine Particulates (PM^s)
Maximum 24-hour concentration (pg/m^) 104.6 41.9 34.7
Number of days exceeded: Federal: > 35 pg/m^ 22 4 0
Annual arithmetic average concentration (pg/m^) 15.1 10.5 8.6 Exceeded for the year: State: > 12 pg/m^ Yes No No
FederaP > 12 pg/m'® Yes No No
Nitrogen Dioxide (NOj)
Maximum 1-hour concentration (ppm) 0.049 0.051 0.048
Number of days exceeded; State: > 0.250 ppm 0 0 0
Annual arithmetic average concentration (ppm) 0.008 0.009 0.008 Exceeded for the year: Federal: > 0,053 ppm No No No
Sulfur Dioxide (SOz)^
Maximum 1-hour concentration (ppm) 0.008 0.003 0.005
Number of days exceeded: State: > 0.25 ppm 0 0 0
Maximum 24-hour concentration (ppm) 0 0 0
Number of days exceeded: State: > 0.04 ppm 0.003 0.001 0.002 Federal: > 0.14 ppm 0 0 0
Annual arithmetic average concentration (ppm) 0.0004 0.0003 0.0004 Exceeded for the year: Federal: >0.030 ppm No No No
Sources: CARB (2023) and USEPA (2023).
' On February 1, 2024, the federal annual PMj s standard was revised from 12.0 ng/m^ to 9.0 ng/m^. However, since the data presented in Table E is through 2022, it uses the 12.0 pg/m^ standard that was in effect through 2022. ' Data for SOj was taken from 3727 North First Street, Fresno monitoring station. All other data was taken from 908 North Villa Avenue, Ciovis Monitoring Station.
pg/m^= micrograms per cubic meter
CARB = California Air Resources Board
ND = No data. There were insufficient (or no) data to determine the value, ppm = parts per million
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
P;\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PROOUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer-AQfieporT.doc* (10/23/24) 30 318 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
In 2022, CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion increased by 1 percent relative to the previous year. This increase in fossil fuel consumption emissions was due primarily to economic activity rebounding after the height of the COVlD-19 pandemic. Of the five major sectors (e.g., residential and commercial, agricultural, industry, transportation, and electricity generation), transportation accounted for the highest amount of GHG emissions in 2022 (approximately 28 percent), with electricity generation second at 25 percent and emissions from industry third at 23 percent." State of California Emissions
The State emitted approximately 381.3 MIVIT COze emissions in 2021, which was 12.1 MMT C02e higher than 2020 levels and 49.7 MMT C02e below the 2020 GHG limit of 431 MMT C02e." GARB estimates that transportation was the source of approximately 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2021. The next largest sources included industrial sources at approximately 19 percent and electricity generation at 16 percent. The remaining sources of GHG emissions were commercial and residential activities at 10 percent, agriculture at 8 percent, high GWP at 6 percent, and waste at 2 percent."
USEPA. 2024. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2022. Website:
https://www.epa.gOv/system/files/documents/2024-04/us-ghg-inventory-2024-main-text_04-18- 2024.pdf (accessed June 2024).

CARB. 2023. California Greenhouse Gas Emissions for 2000 to 2021, Trends of Emissions and Other Indicators Report. Website: https://ww2.arb.ca.gOv/sites/default/files/2023-12/2000_2021_ghg_ inventory_trends.pdf(accessed June 2024).

Ibid.

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PROOUaS\02_AQ_GHG\OeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 3 \ 319 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Imract Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project OcTosER 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA

METHODOLOGY
The methodology used to estimate air quality and GHG impacts is described below.

CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
Construction activities can generate a substantial amount of air pollution. Construction activities are considered temporary; however, short-term impacts can contribute to exceedances of air quality standards. Construction activities include site preparation, earthmoving, and general construction.

The emissions generated from these common construction activities include fugitive dust from soil disturbance, fuel combustion from mobile heavy-duty diesel- and gasoline-powered equipment, portable auxiliary equipment, and worker commute trips.

The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2022.1 computer program was used to calculate emissions from on-site construction equipment and emissions from worker and vehicle trips to the site. Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to begin in 2024, which was included in CalEEMod. The construction duration of the proposed project is not yet known; therefore, this analysis utilizes a CalEEMod default construction schedule, which assumes construction would begin December 2024 and end October 2028. The proposed project would not require the Import or export of soil but would require the demolition of approximately 6,500 square feet of existing buildings, which was also included in CalEEMod. This analysis also assumes the use of Tier 2 construction equipment and that the proposed project would comply with SJVAPCD Regulation VIII for fugitive dust control. Other detailed construction information is currently unavailable; therefore, this analysis utilizes CalEEMod default assumptions.

CONSTRUCTION HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
A construction Health Risk Assessment (HRA), which evaluates construction-period health risk to offsite receptors, was performed for the proposed project, and the analysis is presented below. To estimate the potential cancer risk associated with construction of the proposed project from equipment exhaust {including DPM), a dispersion model was used to translate an emission rate from the source location to a concentration at the receptor location of interest (i.e., a nearby residence and worksites). Dispersion modeling varies from a simpler, more conservative screening-level analysis to a more complex and refined detailed analysis. This refined assessment was conducted using the CARB exposure methodology with the air dispersion modeling performed using the USEPA dispersion model AERMOD. The model provides a detailed estimate of exhaust concentrations based on site and source geometry, source emissions strength, distance from the source to the receptor, and meteorological data.

OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
The air quality analysis includes estimating emissions associated with long-term operation of the proposed project. Consistent with the SJVAPCD guidance for estimating emissions associated with land use development projects, the CalEEMod computer program was used to calculate the longterm operational emissions associated with the project.

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Tcchnical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report-docx (10/23/24) 32 320 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air QuAiiTY ano Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
As discussed in the Project Description section, the proposed project would include the construction of 266 single-family residential units and approximately 0.84 acre of park space. The proposed project analysis was conducted using land use codes Single Family Housing and City Park. Trip generation rates used in CalEEMod for the project were based on the project's TIA, which identifies that the proposed project would generate approximately 2,508 average daily trips. In addition, the following project features were included in CalEEMod:

Installation of ENERGY STAR dishwashers;
Installation of LED lighting;
Use of drip Irrigation;
Installation of low-flow water fixtures;
Use of low VOC paints;
Recycling of up to 90 percent of construction waste; and Independent inspections at random for energy-efficiency verification.

In addition, consistent with SJVAPCD Rule 4901, this analysis assumes that the proposed project would not include any wood burning (or natural gas) fireplaces. Where project-specific data were not available, default assumptions (e.g., energy usage, water usage, and solid waste generation) from CalEEMod were used to estimate project emissions. CalEEMod output sheets are included in Attachment B.

GREENHOUSE GAS ANALYSIS
GHG emissions associated with the project would occur over the short term from construction activities, consisting primarily of emissions from equipment exhaust. There would also be long-term GHG emissions associated with project-related area sources, energy consumption, water conveyance and treatment, and waste generation.

P:\2O2417CI0 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_6HG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.doa (10/23/24) 33 321 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Project
City of Clovis, California LSA

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE

AIR QUALITY
The State CEQA Guidelines Indicate that a project would normally have a significant adverse air quality impact if project-generated pollutant emissions would do any of the following:
• Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; • Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project is nonattainment under applicable federal or State ambient air quality standards; • Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; or • Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) affecting a substantial number of people.

Regional Emissions Thresholds
The SJVAPCD defines emissions thresholds in the GAMAQI, established based on the attainment status of the air basin in regard to air quality standards for specific criteria pollutants. Because the concentration standards were set at a level that protects public health with an adequate margin of safety, these emission thresholds are regarded as conservative and would overstate an individual project's contribution to health risks. The related impacts are discussed further in the Project Impacts section. The SJVAPCD regional emission thresholds for construction and operation are shown in Table F.

Table F; Regional Thresholds for Construction and Operational Emissions Emissions Source Pollutant Emissions Threshold (tons per year) CO NOx ROG SOx PMio PM2.5
Construction 100 10 10 27 15 15
Operations 100 10 10 27 15 15
Source: Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (SJVAPCD 2015).

CO = carbon monoxide ROG = reactive organic gas
NOx = nitrogen oxides SJVAPCD = San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District PM2 s = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size SO* = sulfur oxides PMio = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
Local Microscale Concentration Standards
The significance of localized project impacts under CEQA depends on whether ambient CO levels in the vicinity of the project are above or below State and federal CO standards. Because ambient CO levels are below the standards throughout the SJVAB, a project would be considered to have a significant CO impact if project emissions result in an exceedance of one or more of the 1-hour or 8-hour standards. The following are applicable local emission concentration standards for CO:

P:\20241700 DeVoung Behymer Technical\PftODUCTS\02_ACLGHQ\DeYoung Peach and Behymer-AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 34 322 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Proiect October 2024 City of Ciovis, California LSA
• California State 1-hour CO standard of 20 ppm
• California State 8-hour CO standard of 9 ppm
Health Risk Thresholds
Both the State and federal governments have established health-based AAQS for seven air pollutants. For other air pollutants without defined significance standards, the definition of substantial pollutant concentrations varies. For TACs, "substantial" is taken to mean that the individual health risk exceeds a threshold considered to be a prudent risk management level.

The following limits for maximum individual cancer risk (MICR) and noncancer acute and chronic Hazard Index (HI) from project emissions of TACs are considered appropriate for use in determining the health risk for projects in the SJVAB:
• MICR: MICR is the estimated probability of a maximum exposed individual (MEI) contracting cancer as a result of exposure to TACs over a period of 30 years for adults and 9 years for children in residential locations, 350 days per year. The SJVAPCD's Update to the District's Risk Management Policy to Address the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Revised Risk Assessment Guidance Document states that emissions of TACs are considered significant if an HRA shows an increased risk of greater than 20 in 1 million. • Chronic HI: Chronic HI Is the ratio of the estimated long-term level of exposure to a TAC for a potential MEI to its chronic reference exposure level. The chronic HI calculations include multipathway consideration when applicable. The project would be considered significant if the cumulative increase in total chronic HI for any target organ system would exceed 1.0 at any receptor location.
• Acute HI: Acute HI is the ratio of the estimated maximum 1-hour concentration of a TAC for a potential MEI to its acute reference exposure level. The project would be considered significant if the cumulative increase in total acute HI for any target organ system would exceed 1.0 at any receptor location.

GREENHOUSE GAS THRESHOLDS
The State CEQA Guidelines indicate that a project would normally have a significant adverse GHG emission impact if the project would:
• Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; or
• Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs.

Neither the City nor the SJVAPCD has developed or adopted numeric GHG significance thresholds.

Therefore, this analysis evaluates the GHG emissions based on the project's consistency with applicable State GHG reduction goals.

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymef Technical\PRO0UCTS\02_AQ_GH6\0eYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 35 323 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air QuAiiTY and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project OcTORER 2024 City op Clovis, California LSA

IMPACTS ANALYSIS
This section identifies the air quality and GHG emissions impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project.

AIR QUALITY IMPACTS
Air pollutant emissions associated with the project would occur over the short term from construction activities and over the long term from operational activities associated with the proposed project.

Consistency with Applicable Air Quality Plans
An air quality plan describes air pollution control strategies to be implemented by a city, county, or region classified as a nonattainment area.. As discussed above, the SJVAB is designated as nonattainment for O3 and PMz.s for federal standards and non-attainment for O3, PMio, and PMi.s for State standards. The main purpose of the air quality plan is to bring the area into compliance with the requirements of the federal and State air quality standards. To bring the San Joaquin Valley into attainment, the SJVAPCD adopted the 2022 Plan for the 2015 8-Hour Ozone Standard in December 2022 to satisfy Clean Air Act requirements and ensure attainment of the 75 parts per billion (ppb) 8- hour ozone standard.^®
To ensure the SJVAB's continued attainment of the USEPA PMio standard, the SJVAPCD adopted the 2007 PMio Maintenance Plan in September 2007." The SJVAPCD adopted the 2018 Plan for the 1997, 2006, and 2012 PM2.5 Standards in November 2018, to address the USEPA 1997 annual PMz.s standard of 15 pg/m^ and 24-hour PM2.S standard of 65 pg/m^ the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard of 35 pg/m^ and the 2012 annual PM2.5 standard of 12 pg/m^.^® For a project to be consistent with SJVAPCD air quality plans, the pollutants emitted from a project should not exceed the SJVAPCD emission thresholds or cause a significant impact on air quality. In addition, emission reductions achieved through implementation of offset requirements are a major component of the SJVAPCD air quality plans. As discussed below, construction of the proposed project would not result in the generation of criteria air pollutants that would exceed SJVAPCD thresholds of significance. In addition to the construction period thresholds of significance, the SJVAPCD has implemented Regulation VIII measures for dust control during construction. These control measures are intended to reduce the amount of PMio emissions during the construction period. Implementation of the fugitive dust control measures outlined in Regulatory Compliance Measure (RCM) AIR-1, would ensure that the proposed project complies with Regulation VIII, further reduces the short-term construction period air quality impacts, and ensures compliance with air SJVAPCD. 2016. 2016 Plan for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard. June 16. Website: www.valleyair.org/ A[r_Qualitv__Plans/Ozone-Plan-2016.htm (accessed June 2024).

SJVAPCD. 2007. 2007 PMio Maintenance Plan and Requestfor Redesignation. Website: www.valleyair.org/ Air_Quality_Plans/docs/Maintenance%20Planl0-2S-07.pdf (accessed June 2024).

SJVAPCD. 2018. 2018 Plan for the 1997, 2006, and 2012 PM2.S Standards. November 15. Website:
http://valleyair.org/pmplans/documents/2018/pm-plan-adopted/2018-Plan-for-the-1997-2006-and2012-PM2.5-Standards.pdf (accessed June 2024).

P:\20241700DeVoung BehymerTechnical\PfiODUCTS\02_AQ_GH6\DeYoung Peach and Behymer-AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 36 324 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhousc Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
quality plans. In addition, as discussed below and shown in Table H, long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed project, including area, energy, and mobile source emissions, would also not exceed SJVAPCD established significance thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct Implementation of SJVAPCD air quality plans.

Criteria Pollutant Analysis
The SJVAB is currently designated as nonattainment for the federal and State standards for O3 and PM2.5. In addition,the SJVAB is In nonattainmentfor the PMio standard.The SJVAB's nonattainment status Is attributed to the region's development history. Past, present, and future development projects contribute to the region's adverse air quality impacts on a cumulative basis. By its very nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. No single project is sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of an ambient air quality standard. Instead, a project's individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality Impacts. If a project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considerable, then the project's impact on air quality would be considered significant.

In developing thresholds of significance for air pollutants, the SJVAPCD considered the emission levels for which a project's individual emissions would be cumulatively considerable. If a project exceeds the identified significance thresholds, its emissions would be cumulatively considerable, resulting in significant adverse air quality impacts to the region's existing air quality conditions. The following analysis assesses the potential construction- and operation-related air quality impacts.

Construction Emissions
During construction, short-term degradation of air quality may occur due to the release of particulate emissions generated by demolition, grading, paving, building, and other activities.

Emissions from construction equipment are also anticipated and would include CO, NOx, ROG, directly-emitted particulate matter {PM2.5 and PMio), and TACs such as diesel exhaust particulate matter.

Construction activities associated with the proposed project would include demolition, site preparation, grading, paving, and building activities. Construction-related effects on air quality from the proposed project would be greatest during the site preparation phase due to the disturbance of soils. If not properly controlled, these activities would temporarily generate particulate emissions.

Sources of fugitive dust would include disturbed soils at the construction site. Unless properly controlled, vehicles leaving the site would deposit dirt and mud on local streets, which could be an additional source of airborne dust after it dries. PMio emissions would vary from day to day, depending on the nature and magnitude of construction activity and local weather conditions. PMio emissions would depend on soil moisture, silt content of soil, wind speed, and the amount of operating equipment. Larger dust particles would settle near the source, while fine particles would be dispersed over greater distances from the construction site.

Water or other soil stabilizers can be used to control dust, resulting in emission reductions of 50 percent or more. The SJVAPCD has implemented Regulation VIII measures for reducing fugitive dust emissions (PMio). With the implementation of Regulation VIII measures, fugitive dust emissions from construction activities would not result In adverse air quality impacts.

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRQOUCTS\02_AQ_GH6\OeYoung Peach and Behymer-AQReport.docx (10/23/24) 37 325 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Project
City of Clovis, CAiifoRNiA LSA
In addition to dust-related PMio emissions, heavy trucks and construction equipment powered by gasoline and diesel engines would generate CO, SO2, NOx, ROG, and some soot particulate (PM2.5and PMio) in exhaust emissions. If construction activities were to increase traffic congestion in the area, CO and other emissions from traffic would increase slightly while those vehicles idle In traffic. These emissions would be temporary in nature and limited to the immediate area surrounding the construction site.

Construction emissions were estimated for the project using CalEEMod and are summarized in Table G. Appendix A provides CalEEMod output sheets.

Table G: Short-Term Regional Construction Emissions
Construction Year Pollutant Emissions (Tons per Year)
ROG NOx CO SOx PMio PM2.5
2024 <0.1 0.3 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
2025 0.1 4.0 3.1 <0.1 0.4 0.2
2026 0.1 2.6 2.3 <0.1 0.2 0.1
2027 0.1 1.6 2.2 <0.1 0.2 0.1
2028 1.7 1.3 1.1 <0.1 0.1 0.1
Maximum Emissions 1.7 4.0 3.1 <0.1 0.2 0.2
SJVAPCD Threshold 10.0 10.0 100.0 27.0 15.0 15.0
Significant? No No No No No No
Source; Compiled by LSA (June 2024).

CO = carbon monoxide
N0,= nitrogen oxides
PM2.S = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PMio = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
ROG = reactive organic gas
SJVAPCD = San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District SOx = sulfur oxides
As shown in Table G, construction emissions associated with the proposed project would not exceed the SJVAPCD's thresholds for ROG, NO*, CO, SOx, PMio, and PM2.S emissions. In addition to the construction period thresholds of significance, the SJVAPCD has implemented Regulation VIII measures for dust control during construction. Implementation of Regulatory Compliance Measure (RCM) AIR-1 would ensure that the proposed project complies with Regulation VIII.

RCM AIR-1 Consistent with San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) Regulation VIII (Fugitive PMio Prohibitions), the following controls are required to be included as specifications for the proposed project and implemented at the construction site:
• All disturbed areas, including storage piles, which are not being actively utilized for construction purposes, shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant or covered with a tarp or other suitable cover or vegetative ground cover.
• All on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access roads shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant.

P;\20241700 OeYoung Behymer TechnlCBl\PR0DUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\0eVoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 38 326 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality ano Grlinhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Bihymer Besioential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
• All land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land leveling, grading, cut and fill, and demolition activities shall be effectively controlled of fugitive dust emissions utilizing application of water or by presoaking. • When materials are transported off site, all material shall be covered, or effectively wetted to limit visible dust emissions, and at least 6 inches of freeboard space from the top of the container shall be maintained. • All operations shall limit or expeditiously remove the accumulation of mud or dirt from adjacent public streets at the end of each workday. (The use of dry rotary brushes is expressly prohibited except where preceded or accompanied by sufficient wetting to limit the visible dust emissions. Use of blower devices is expressly forbidden.)
• Following the addition of materials to, or the removal of materials from, the surface of outdoor storage piles, said piles shall be effectively stabilized of fugitive dust emissions utilizing sufficient water or chemical stabilizer/ suppressant.

Construction emissions associated with the proposed project would be less than significant with implementation of ROM AIR-1. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard.

Operational Air Quality Impacts
Long-term air pollutant emission impacts associated with the proposed project are those related to mobile sources (e.g., vehicle trips), energy sources (e.g., natural gas), and area sources (e.g., architectural coatings and the use of landscape maintenance equipment).

Mobile source emissions include ROG and NOx emissions that contribute to the formation of ozone.

Additionally, PMio emissions result from running exhaust, tire and brake wear, and the entrainment of dust into the atmosphere from vehicles traveling on paved roadways.

Energy source emissions result from activities in buildings for which natural gas is used. The quantity of emissions Is the product of usage intensity (i.e., the amount of natural gas) and the emission factor of the fuel source. However, the proposed project would not include natural gas and no natural gas demand is anticipated during operation of the proposed project.

Typically, area source emissions consist of direct sources of air emissions located at the project site, including architectural coatings and the use of landscape maintenance equipment. Area source emissions associated with the project would include emissions from the use of landscaping equipment and the use of consumer products.

Long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed project were calculated using CalEEMod. Table H provides the proposed project's estimated operational emissions. Appendix A provides CalEEMod output sheets.

P:\20241700 OeYoufig Behymer Technical\PR0DUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 39 327 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Project
City of Clovis, California LSA
Table H: Project Operational Emissions
EmtssionType Pollutant Emissions (Tons per Year)
ROG NOx CO SOx PMio PM2.S
Mobile Sources 1.4 1.3 9.1 <0.1 2.2 0.6
Area Sources 2.3 <0.1 1.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Energy Sources 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Project Emissions 3.7 1.3 10.5 <0.1 2.2 0.6
SJVAPCD Threshold 10.0 10.0 100.0 27.0 15.0 15.0
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No
Source: Compiled by LSA (June 2024).

Note: Some values may not appear to add correctly due to rounding.

CO = carbon monoxide ROG = reactive organic gas
NO, = nitrogen oxides SJVAPCD = San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District PM2 s = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size SOx = sulfur oxides PMjo = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
The results shown in Table H indicate the proposed project would not exceed the significance criteria for daily ROG, NOx, CO, SOx, PMio, or PM2.5 emissions. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or State AAQS.

Long-Term Microscale (CO Hot Spot) Analysis
Vehicular trips associated with the proposed project would contribute to congestion at intersections and along roadway segments in the vicinity of the proposed project site. Localized air quality impacts would occur when emissions from vehicular traffic increase as a result of the proposed project. The primary mobile-source pollutant of local concern is CO, a direct function of vehicle idling time and, thus, of traffic flow conditions. CO transport is extremely limited; under normal meteorological conditions, it disperses rapidly with distance from the source. However, under certain extreme meteorological conditions, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthful levels, affecting local sensitive receptors (e.g., residents, schoolchildren, the elderly, and hospital patients).

Typically, high CO concentrations are associated with roadways or intersections operating at unacceptable levels of service or with extremely high traffic volumes. In areas with high ambient background CO concentrations, modeling is recommended to determine a project's effect on local CO levels.

An assessment of project-related impacts on localized ambient air quality requires that future ambient air quality levels be projected. Ambient CO levels monitored at the Clovis air quality monitoring stations, the closest stations to the project site, showed a highest recorded 1-hour concentration of 1.5 ppm (the State standard is 20 ppm) and a highest 8-hour concentration of 1.3 ppm (the State standard is 9 ppm) during the past 3 years (Table E). The highest CO concentrations would normally occur during peak traffic hours; hence, CO impacts calculated under peak traffic conditions represent a worst-case analysis.

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Techr»ical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 40 328 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Grecnhousc Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymcr Residential Project
City of Clovis, California LSA
Based on the project's TIA, the proposed project would result in 186 a.m. and 250 p.m. peak-hour trips. With implementation of the recommended improvements outlined in the TIA, the proposed project would not result in any operational deficiencies to the surrounding roadway system. The evaluation of the study area intersections shows that the addition of traffic associated with the proposed project is not expected to create a significant level of service changes. Therefore, given the extremely low level of CO concentrations in the project area and the lack of traffic impacts at any intersections, project-related vehicles are not expected to result in CO concentrations exceeding the State or federal CO standards. No CO hot spots would occur, and the project would not result in any project-related impacts on CO concentrations.

Health Risk on Nearby Sensitive Receptors
Sensitive receptors are defined as residential uses, schools, daycare centers, nursing homes, and medical centers. Individuals particularly vulnerable to diesel particulate matter are children, whose lung tissue is still developing, and the elderly, who may have serious health problems that can be aggravated by exposure to diesel particulate matter. The project site is surrounded primarily by agricultural uses with some residential and commercial uses. The closest sensitive receptors to the project site include single-family residences located approximately 75 feet west of the project site and 100 feet north of the project site.

A construction HRA, which evaluates construction-period health risk to off-site receptors, was performed for the proposed project. Table I, below, identifies the results of the analysis assuming the use of Tier 2 construction equipment as proposed by the project. Model snapshots of the sources are shown in Appendix B.

Table I: Health Risks from Project Construction to Off-Site Receptors Location
Carcinogenic
Inhalation Health Risk in
One Million
Chronic Inhalation
Hazard Index
Acute Inhalation
Hazard Index
Residential Receptor Risk 9.92 0,010 0.000
Worker Receptor Risk 6.02 0.010 0.000
School Receptor 0.24 <0.001 0,000
SJVAPCD Significance Threshold 20.0 In one million 1.0 1.0 Significant? No No No
Source: LSA (June 2024).

SJVAPCD = San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District As shown in Table I, the maximum cancer risk for the residential receptor MEI would be 9.92 in one million, which would not exceed the SJVAPCD cancer risk threshold of 20 in one million. The worker receptor risk would be lower at 6.02 in one million and the school receptor risk would be 0.24 In one million, which would also not exceed the SJVAPCD cancer risk thresholds. The total chronic hazard index would be 0.010 for the residential receptor MEI and worker receptor MEI and less than 0.001 for the school receptor MEI, which are all below the threshold of 1.0. In addition, the total acute hazard index would be nominal (0.000), which would also not exceed the threshold of 1.0.

Therefore, construction of the proposed project would not exceed SJVAPCD thresholds and would P:\20241700 OeVoung Behymer Technical\PROOUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer • AQ Reporr.docx (10/23/24) 41 329 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas tMPAcr Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
not expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. No significant health risk would occur from project construction emissions.

The proposed project would include the construction of a 266-unit single-family residential development. As identified in Table H, project operational emissions of criteria pollutants would be below SJVAPCD significance thresholds; thus, they are not likely to have a significant impact on sensitive receptors. In addition, the proposed project would be required to implement District Rule 9510, Indirect Source Review (ISR). Implementation of Rule 9510 would reduce operational emissions of NOx and PMio by 33.3 percent and 50 percent, respectively. Compliance with SJVAPCD rules would further limit doses and exposures, reducing potential health risk related to vehicle and equipment emissions to a level that is not significant. Once the proposed project is constructed, the proposed project would not be a source of substantial emissions. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in new sources of TACs. Therefore, the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial levels of TACs.

Odors
The SJVAPCD addresses odor criteria within the GAMAQ.I. The district has not established a rule or standard regarding odor emissions, rather, the district has a nuisance rule: "Any project with the potential to frequently expose members of the public to objectionable odors should be deemed to have a significant impact."
During project construction, some odors may be present due to diesel exhaust. However, these odors would be temporary and limited to the construction period. The proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Any odors in general would be confined mainly to the project site and would readily dissipate. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

Naturally Occurring Asbestos
The project is in Fresno County, which is among the counties found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soWs}^ However, according to the California Geological Survey, no such rock has been identified in the project vicinity. In addition, the proposed project would require demolition of the existing residential uses. As such, demolition activities may expose asbestos used in building materials; however, the proposed project would be required to comply with the SJVAPCD's rules related to demolition, including SJVAPCD Rule 3050: Asbestos Removal Fees and Rule 4002: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, which would help reduce asbestos exposure. Therefore, with compliance of SJVAPCD Rules 3050 and 4002, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and would not be significant.

California Department of Conservation (DOC), n.d. California Geological Survey. Asbestos. Website:
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/minerals/mineral-hazards (accessed June 2024).

P:\20241700 0eyoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer-AQReport.doc* (10/23/24) 42 330 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Gre{nhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymcr Residential Project October 2024 City of Ciovis. California LSA
Valley Fever
The closest sensitive receptors to the project site include single-family residences located approximately 75 feet west of the project site and 100 feet north of the project site. Except under high wind conditions, this distance is sufficient that particulate matter would settle prior to reaching the nearest sensitive receptor. In addition, crosswinds influenced by the adjacent roadways would help dissipate any particulate matter associated with the construction phase of the project.

Therefore, any Valley fever spores suspended with the dust would not be anticipated to reach the sensitive receptors. However, during project construction, it is possible that workers could be exposed to Valley fever through fugitive dust. Dust control measures, consistent with SJVAPCD Regulation VIM, would reduce the exposure to the workers and sensitive receptors. Therefore, dust from the construction of the project is not anticipated to significantly add to the existing exposure of people to Valley fever.

GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACTS
This section describes the potential GHG impacts associated with Implementation the proposed project.

Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
This section describes the proposed project's construction- and operational-related GHG emissions and contribution to global climate change.

Short-Term Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Construction activities associated with the construction of residential and nonresidential development capacity would cause short-term GHG emissions. Construction activities with the proposed project would produce combustion emissions from various sources. During construction, GHGs would be emitted through the operation of construction equipment and from worker and builder supply vendor vehicles, each of which typically use fossil-based fuels to operate. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHGs such as CO2, CH4, and N2O. Furthermore, CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Exhaust emissions from on-site construction activities would vary daily as construction activity levels change.

The SJVAPCD does not have an adopted threshold of significance for construction-related GHG emissions. However, lead agencies are encouraged to quantify and disclose GHG emissions that would occur during construction. Using CalEEMod, it is estimated that the annual emissions associated with construction of the proposed project would be approximately 1,545.0 metric tons of C02e per year. Construction GHG emissions were amortized over the life of the project (assumed to be 30 years) and added to the operational emissions. When annualized over the life of the project, amortized construction emissions would be approximately 51.5 MT C02e per year.

Long-Term Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Long-term GHG emissions are typically generated from mobile sources (e.g., vehicle and truck trips), area sources (e.g., maintenance activities and landscaping), indirect emissions from sources associated with energy consumption, waste sources (land filling and waste disposal), and water sources (water supply and conveyance, treatment, and distribution). Mobile-source GHG emissions P:\20241700 DeYoung BehymerTechnical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\0eYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 43 331 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality ano Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Project
City of Clovis, California LSA
would include project-generated vehicle trips to and from the project. Area-source emissions would be associated with activities such as landscaping and maintenance on the project site. Energy source emissions would be generated at off-site utility providers as a result of increased electricity demand generated by the project. Waste source emissions generated by the proposed project include energy generated by land filling and other methods of disposal related to transporting and managing project generated waste. In addition, water source emissions associated with the proposed project are generated by water supply and conveyance, water treatment, water distribution, and wastewater treatment.

Following guidance from the SJVAPCD, GHG emissions for operation of the project were calculated using CalEEMod. Based on the analysis results, summarized in Table J, the proposed project would result in emissions of approximately 2,650.4 MI C02e per year. These estimated emissions are provided for informational purposes, and the significance of the proposed project Is further analyzed below. CalEEMod output sheets are provided in Attachment B.

Table J: Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Emission Type Operational Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) CO2 CH4 N2O €□28
Mobile Sources 2,225.3 0.1 0.1 2,266.2
Area Sources 6.6 <0.1 <0.1 6.7
Energy Sources 229.7 <0.1 <0.1 231,9
Water Sources 12.3 0.3 <0.1 21.3
Waste Sources 21.1 2.1 0.0 72.8
Amortized Construction Emissions 51.5
Totai Operationai Emissions 2,650.4
Source: Compiled by LSA (June 2024).

CH< = methane
CO2 = carbon dioxide
COje = carbon dioxide equivalent
NiO = nitrous oxide
As discussed, the SJVAPCD has not established a numeric threshold for GHG emissions. The significance of GHG emissions may be evaluated based on locally adopted quantitative thresholds or consistency with a regional GHG reduction plan (such as a Climate Action Plan [CAP]). Neither the City nor the SJVAPCD has developed or adopted numeric GHG significance thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project was analyzed for consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan.

The 2022 Scoping Plan includes key project attributes that reduce operational GHG emissions in Appendix D, Local Actions,^" of the 2022 Scoping Plan. As discussed in Appendix D of the 2022 Scoping Plan, absent consistency with an adequate, geographically specific GHG reduction plan such as a CEQA-qualified CAP, the first approach the State recommends for determining whether a proposed residential or mixed-use residential development would align with the State's climate goals is to examine whether the project Includes key project attributes that reduce operational GHG emissions.
^ GARB. 2022a. 2022 Scoping Plan Appendix D Local Actions. November. Website: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ sltes/default/files/2022-ll/2022-sp-appendix-d-local-actions.pdf (accessed June 2024).

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_6HG\DeVoung Peach and Behymer-AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 44 332 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Project
City of Clovis, California LSA
The project's consistency with key project attributes from the 2022 Scoping Plan that would be applicable to residential and mixed-use development is shown in Table K.

Table K: Project Consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan Key Residential and Mixed-Use Project Attributes that Reduce GHGs
Priority Areas Key Project Attribute Project Consistency Transportation
Electrification
Provides EV charging Infrastructure that,
at minimum, meets the most ambitious
voluntary standard in the CALGreen
Code at the time of project approval
Consistent. CALGreen Code requires provision of
infrastructure to accommodate EV chargers. The
proposed project would Install a breaker and wiring
for EV at each residence, consistent with CALGreen
requirements. Therefore, the proposed project would
be consistent with this key project attribute.

VMT Reduction Is located on Infill sites that are
surrounded by existing urban uses and
reuses or redevelops previously
undeveloped or underutilized land that is
presently served by existing utilities and
essential public services (e.g., transit,
streets, water, sewer)
Not consistent. The project site is surrounded
primarily by agricultural uses with some residential
and commercial uses. The surrounding residential uses
are presently served by existing utilities and essential public services (e.g., transit, streets, water, sewer).

However, as described In the TIA, the project's vehicle miles traveled (VMT) was calculated to be 14.9 VMT
per capita, 5.5 percent higher than the City's VMT per
capita threshold. As further discussed in the TIA, the
project is consistent with the City's General Plan.

While preparation of the General Plan, an
Environmental Impact Report was prepared, along
with a statement of Overriding consideration, that
discussed the potential environmental Impacts and
required mitigation measures to be
implemented/followed by all future projects that are
consistent with the General Plan. The project will be
conditioned to Implement and follow these measures.

Therefore, the though project will have a significant
and unavoidable transportation Impact under CEQA,
no further mitigation measure would be required for
the project. However, because the proposed project
would result In a significant and unavoidable VMT
impact, the proposed project would not be consistent
with this key project attribute.

Does not result in the loss or conversion
of natural and working lands
Not consistent. The project site Is currently being used for residential and agricultural uses Including an active orchard, The project site is zoned Exclusive
Agricultural with a minimum 20-acre lot size. Based on
California DOC FMMP information, the project site Is
designated as Prime Farmland and Farmland of
Statewide Importance. According to the County of
Fresno Assessor's Map, no portion of the project site Is under an active Williamson Act contract. A sitespecific LESA model was prepared for the project, which found that the conversion of the agricultural
land (Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide
Importance, and Farmland of Local Importance) on the
project site to a non-agricultural use would constitute a significant impact. Therefore, the proposed project
P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technica!\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoun6 Peach and Behymer • AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 45 333 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and 6re€nhous£ Gas Impact Analysis
October 2024
Peach and Behymer Residential Project
City of Ciovis, California LSA
Table K: Project Consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan Key Residential and Mixed-Use Project Attributes that Reduce GHGs
Priority Areas Key Project Attribute Project Consistency would not be consistent with this key project
attribute.

Consists of transit-supportive densities
(minimum of 20 residential dwelling
units per acre) or is in proximity to
existing transit stops (within a half mile)
or satisfies more detailed and stringent
criteria specified in the region's SCS
Not consistent The proposed project would Include
the construction of 266 single-family units on a 37-
acre project site. Therefore, the proposed project
would result in less than 20 residential dwelling units per acre. In addition, the project site Is not located
within 0,5 mile of a transit stop. As such, the proposed project would not be consistent with this key project
attribute.

Reduces parking requirements by
eliminating parking requirements or
including maximum allowable parking
ratios (I.e., the ratio of parking spaces to
residential units or square feet); or
providing residential parking supply at a
ratio of less than one parking space per
dwelling unit; or for multifamily
residential development, requiring
parking costs to be unbundled from costs
to rent or own a residential unit
Consistent. The proposed project would consist of 266
single-family units and would be consistent with the
City's parking requirements for single homes. The
proposed project would not provide additional on-site
street parking space. Thus, the project would be
consistent with the intent of this key project attribute.

At least 20 percent of units included are
affordable to lower-income residents
Consistent. The proposed project would not include
affordable residential units. Although the proposed
project would not include affordable housing, the
proposed project would provide needed single-family
housing. Therefore, the proposed project would be
consistent with this key project attribute.

Results in no net loss of existing
affordable units
Consistent. The proposed project would demolish two
existing residential uses; however, the proposed
project would not result in the removal of any existing affordable units. As such, the proposed project would
be consistent with this key project attribute.

Building
Decarbonization
Uses all-electric appliances without any
natural gas connections and does not
use propane or other fossil fuels for
space heating, water heating, or Indoor
cooking
Consistent The proposed project would be all-electric,
which is consistent with this key project attribute.

Source: Compiled by LSA (June 2024).

CALGreen Code = California Green Building Standards Code GPA DOC = California Department of Conservation LESA
EV = electric vehicle SCS =
FMMP = Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program VMT
GHG = greenhouse gas
s General Plan Amendment
= Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Sustainable Communities Strategy
= vehicle miles traveled.

P:\20241700 OeYoung Behymer Technlca^PROOUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeVoung Peach and Behymer • AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 46 334 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air QuAiiT* and Greenhousj Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Resioentiai Project I A October 2024 City of Ctovis. California L
Residential and mixed-use projects that have all of the key project attributes as outlined in Table K would be considered to accommodate growth in a manner consistent with State GHG reduction and equity prioritization goals as outlined in the 2022 Scoping Plan. As demonstrated in Table K, the proposed project would not be consistent with the 2022 Scoping Plan key residential and mixed-use project attributes related to VMT reduction.

As discussed in Table K and in the project's TIA, the proposed project would result In a significant and unavoidable VMT Impact. As previously noted, the project is consistent with the City's General Plan. During preparation of the General Plan, an EIR was prepared, along with a Statement of Overriding Consideration, that discussed the potential environmental impacts and required mitigation measures to be implemented/followed by ail future projects that are consistent with the General Plan. The proposed project would be conditioned to implement and follow these measures.

Therefore, though proposed project would have a significant and unavoidable transportation impact under CEQA, no further mitigation measure would be required for the project related to VMT.

The proposed project would implement required VMT mitigation measures as identified in the City's General Plan EIR. However, they would not reduce the impact to a less than significant level.

Additionally, the proposed project would result in less than 20 residential dwelling units per acre and is not located within 0.5 mile of a transit stop. Further, as determined by the site-specific Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA), conversion of the agricultural land (Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Farmland of Local Importance) on the project site to a nonagricultural use would constitute a significant impact. There are no additional feasible mitigation measures that would reduce this impact. As such, the proposed project would not be consistent with all project attributes in the 2022 Scoping Plan GHG emission thresholds. As such, the proposed project would result in the generation of GHG emissions would have a significant and unavoidable impact on the environment.

Consistency with Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Plans An evaluation of the proposed project's consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan and the 2024-2050 RTP/SCS is provided below.
2022 Scoping Plan
The following discussion evaluates the proposed project according to the goals of the 2022 Scoping Plan, EO B-30-15, AB 1279, SB 32, and AB 197.

EO B-30-15 added the immediate target of reducing GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. GARB released a second update to the Scoping Plan, the 2017 Scoping Plan, to reflect the 2030 target set by EO B-30-15 and codified by SB 32. SB 32 affirms the importance of addressing climate change by codifying into statute the GHG emissions reductions target of at least 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 contained in EO B-30-15. SB 32 builds on AB 32 and keeps us on the path toward achieving the State's 2050 objective of reducing emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels.

The companion bill to SB 32, AB 197, provides additional direction to the GARB related to the adoption of strategies to reduce GHG emissions. Additional direction in AB 197 intended to provide easier public access to air emissions data that are collected by GARB was posted in December 2016.

AB 1279 establishes State policy to achieve net zero GHG emissions no later than 2045 and for P;\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technlcal\PRODUaS\02_ACLGHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 47 335 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Anaiysis Peach and Behymer Residential Proiect October 2024 City of Ciovis, California LSA
Statewide anthropogenic GHG emissions to be reduced to at least 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2045.

In addition, the 2022 Scoping Plan assesses progress toward the statutory 2030 target, while laying out a path to achieving carbon neutrality no later than 2045. The 2022 Scoping Plan focuses on outcomes needed to achieve carbon neutrality by assessing paths for clean technology, energy deployment, natural and working lands, and others, and is designed to meet the State's long-term climate objectives and support a range of economic, environmental, energy security, environmental justice, and public health priorities.

The 2022 Scoping Plan focuses on building clean energy production and distribution infrastructure for a carbon-neutral future, including transitioning existing energy production and transmission infrastructure to produce zero-carbon electricity and hydrogen, and utilizing biogas resulting from wildfire management or landfill and dairy operations, among other substitutes. The 2022 Scoping Plan states that in almost all sectors, electrification will play an important role. The 2022 Scoping Plan evaluates clean energy and technology options and the transition away from fossil fuels, including adding four times the solar and wind capacity by 2045 and about 1,700 times the amount of current hydrogen supply. As discussed in the 2022 Scoping Plan, EO N-79-20 requires that all new passenger vehicles sold in California will be zero-emission by 2035, and all other fleets will have transitioned to zero-emission as fully possible by 2045, which will reduce the percentage of fossil fuel combustion vehicles.

Energy efficient measures are intended to maximize energy efficiency building and appliance standards, pursue additional efficiency efforts including new technologies and new policy and implementation mechanisms, and pursue comparable investment in energy efficiency from all retail providers of electricity in California. In addition, these measures are designed to expand the use of green building practices to reduce the carbon footprint of California's new and existing Inventory of buildings. As identified above, buildout of the proposed project would be required to comply with the latest Title 24 and CALGreen Code standards regarding water efficiency and energy conservation requirements. Additionally, the proposed project would be all-electric. The elimination of natural gas in new development would help projects implement their "fair share" of achieving long-term 2045 carbon neutrality consistent with State goals. As such, if a project does not utilize natural gas, a lead agency can conclude that it would be consistent with achieving the 2045 neutrality goal and will not have a cumulative considerable impact on climate change." In addition, the proposed project would include the following sustainable features: Installation of ENERGY STAR dishwashers, bathroom exhaust fans, water heaters, and windows; installation of high-efficiency HVAC systems and programmable thermostats; installation of solar on each residence per CALGreen Code requirements; Installation of cool roof tiles and high-performance, formaldehyde-free insulation; installation of MERV-8 filters; installation of LED lighting; and independent inspections at random for 31 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2022. Justification Report: CEQA Thresholds for Evaluating the Significance of Climate impacts From Land Use Projects and Plans. April. Website:
https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa-guidelines-2022/appendjx-bthresholds-for-evaluating-significance-of-climate-impacts_final-pdf (accessed June 2024).

P:\20241700 DeVoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_6H6\OeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 48 336 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
energy-efficiency verification. Therefore, the proposed project would comply with applicable energy measures.

Water conservation and efficiency measures are Intended to continue efficiency programs and use cleaner energy sources to move and treat water. Increasing the efficiency of water transport and reducing water use would reduce GHG emissions. As noted above, buildout associated with the proposed project would be required to comply with the latest Title 24 and CALGreen Code standards, which include a variety of different measures, including reduction of wastewater and water use. In addition, the proposed project would use drip irrigation and install low-flow water fixtures. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any of the water conservation and efficiency measures.

The goal of transportation and motor vehicle measures is to develop regional GHG emissions reduction targets for passenger vehicles. Specific regional emission targets for transportation emissions would not directly apply to the proposed project. The Pavley II (LEV III) Advanced Clean Cars Program will reduce GHG emissions from new cars by 34 percent from 2016 levels by 2025, resulting in a 3 percent decrease in average vehicle emissions for all vehicles by 2020. Vehicles traveling to the project site would comply with the Pavley II (LEV III) Advanced Clean Cars Program.

Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with the identified transportation and motor vehicle measures.

Fresno COG 2022 RTP/SCS
The Fresno COG RTP/SCS reflects transportation planning for Fresno County through 2046. The vision, goals, and policies in the 2022 RTP are intended to serve as the foundation for both short and long-term planning and guide implementation activities. The core vision in the 2022 RTP is to create a region of diverse, safe, resilient, and accessible transportation options that improve the quality of life for all residents by fostering sustainability, equity, a vibrant economy, clean air, and healthy communities. The 2022 RTP contains transportation projects to help more efficiently distribute population, housing, and employment growth, as well as forecast development that is generally consistent with regional-level general plan data. The actions in the 2022 RTP address all transportation modes (e.g., highways, local streets and roads, mass transportation, rail, bicycle, and aviation facilities and services) and consists of short and long-term activities that address regional transportation needs. While the actions are organized by the five key policy areas, many of them support multiple goals and policies. Some actions are intended to support the SCS and reduce GHG emissions directly, while others are focused on the RTP's broader goals. The 2022 RTP does not require that local General Plans, Specific Plans, or zoning be consistent with the 2022 RTP, but provides incentives for consistency for governments and developers.

The proposed project would not interfere with the Fresno COG's ability to achieve the region's GHG reductions. Furthermore, the proposed project is not regionally significant per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15206, and it would not conflict with the 2022 RTP targets because those targets were established and are applicable on a regional level. The proposed project would include the construction of 266 single-family residential units. As such, the proposed project land uses would be consistent with the growth assumptions used in the 2022 RTP. Therefore, it is anticipated that P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 49 337 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Gr«enhous£ Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Ciovis, California LSA
implementation of the proposed project would not interfere with Fresno COG's ability to implement the regional strategies outlined in the 2022 RTP.

Summary
As described above, the proposed project would generally comply with existing State reguiatlons adopted to achieve the overall GHG emissions reduction goals identified in the 2022 RTP. However, as described above, the proposed project would not be consistent with the 2022 Scoping Plan key residential and mixed-use project attributes related to VMT reduction. As such, the proposed project would not contribute to its "fair share" of emission reductions required to support achieving long-term State GHG reduction goals due to project's significant and unavoidable VMT impact.

Therefore, the proposed project would conflict with the plans and policies adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases, including the CARB 2022 Scoping Plan, Executive Order B-30-15, SB 32, and AB 1279.

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_6H6\0eYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 50 338 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and Greenhousc Gas (mpact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Pro;ect October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA

CONCLUSION
Based on the analysis presented above, construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in the generation of criteria air pollutants that would exceed SJVAPCD thresholds of significance. In addition, the proposed project is not expected to produce significant emissions that would affect nearby sensitive receptors. The project would also not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) affecting a substantial number of people. Operation of the proposed project would generate GHG emissions that would have a significant and unavoidable impact on the environment. In addition, the proposed project would be consistent with the growth assumptions used in the Fresno COG 2022 RTP/SCS, but would not be consistent with the goals of the 2022 Scoping Plan.

P:\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Technical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GHG\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 51 339 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Air Quality and GREENHOUSt Gas Impact Analysis Peach and Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Clovis, California LSA
This page Intentionally left blank
P:\20241700 OeYoung Behymer Technical^R0DUCTS\02_AQ_GH6\Deyoune Peach and Behymer • AQ Report.dooc (10/23/24) 52 340 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Am Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Peach ano Behymer Residential Project October 2024 City of Ciovis, California LSA

APPENDIX A

CALEEMOD OUTPUT SHEETS
P;\20241700 DeYoung Behymer Teehnical\PRODUCTS\02_AQ_GH6\DeYoung Peach and Behymer - AQ Report.docx (10/23/24) 341 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report 'able of Contents
. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector . Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.2. Demolition (2024) - Mitigated
1/85
342
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202

3.3. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated

3.4. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated

3.5. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated

3.6. Site Preparation (2025) - Mitigated

3.7. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated

3.8. Grading (2025) - Mitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.10. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated

3.11. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.12. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated

3.13. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated

3.14. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated

3.15. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated

3.16. Building Construction (2028) - Mitigated

3.17. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated

3.18. Paving (2028) - Mitigated

3.19. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated
2/85
343
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202

3.20. Architectural Coating (2028) - Mitigated
. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
3/85
344
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.5.2. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 4/85
345
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soli Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species • Mitigated ,Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.3.2. Mitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
5/85
346
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
6/85
347
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change
7/85
348
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Blomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
User Changes to Default Data
8/85
349
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
. Basic Project Information
.1. Basic Project Information
De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 'roject Name
construction Start Date
Dperaticnal Year
.ead Agency
.and Use Scale
Xnalysis Level for Defaults
/Vindspeed (m/s)
Precipitation (days)
-ocation
county
2ity
Xir District
Xir Basin
rAZ
£DFZ
•iectric Utility
jas Utility
Xpp Xfersion
.2. Land Use Types
De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project
12/2/2024
202S
Project/site
County

2.70 21.2

36.88062613315833. -119.71577194386307
Fresno
Unln<»rporated
San Joaquin Valley APCD
San Joaquin Valley
2569
5 Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Pacific Gas & Electric
2022.1.1.24
Lot Acreage Building Area <sq ft) Landscape Area (sq Special Landscape ft) Areaisqft)
Description
9/65
350
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 jingle Family
-lousing
266 Dwelling Unit 36.2 516,700 3.115.620
Jity Park 0.84 Acre 0.84 0.00 36,590
.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector 851
construction
•nergy
Energy
Energy
Vater
Vater
Waste
0-6
E-2
E-7*
E-22*
W-4
W-5
S-4*
Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results.

I Emissions Summary
:.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds :riteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs {lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 36,590
Measure Title
Use Diesel Particulate Filters
Require Energy Efficient Appliances
Require Higher Efficacy Public Street and Area Lighting Obtain Third-party HVAC Commissioning and Veri cation of Energy Savings
Require Low-Flow Water Fixtures
Design Water-Efficient Landscapes
Recycle Demolished Construction Material
n Mit. ROG
)aiiy,
>ummer
Max]
PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2 50 PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 Jnmit.
/K.
deduced

59.1 59.1

48.9 48.9

36.1 36.1

0.06 1.36 3.70 5.06 1.23 1.45 2.68

0.06 0.20 3.70 3.90 0.18 1.45 1.64
— 85% — 23% 85% — 39%

6.720
6,720
6,720
6,720

0.27 0.27

0.10 0.10
6,745

6.745
10/85
351
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Daily,
/Vinter
Max)
Jnmit.
i^it.
/o
deduced
Werage
Dally
Max)
Jnmit.
i4it.

Reduced
\nnual
Max)
Jnmit.
■Alt.
/o
Reduced

59.1 59.1

9.23 9.23

1.69 1.69

48.9 48.9

22.1 22.1

4.03 4.03

36.0 36.0

17.3 17.3

3.15 3.15

0.08 0.06

0.03 0.03

0.01 0.01

1.36 0.20
85%

0.67 0.10
85%

0.12 0.02
85%

7.76 7.76

1.62 1.62

0.30 0.30

6.88 7.93
11%

2.29 1.72
25%

0.42 0.31
25%

1.23 0.18
85%

0.62 0.09
85%

0.11 0.02
85%

3.96 3.96

0.68 0.68

0.12 0.12

4.98 4.11
17%

1.29 0.77
40%
0,24

0.14 40%
6,706
6,706
3,244
3,244
537
537
6,706
6,706
3,244
3,244
537
537

0.27 0.27

0.13 0.13

0.02 0.02

0.10 0.10

0.07 0.07

0.01 0.01
6,731
6,731
3,264
3,264
540
540
:.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
)riteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T
Daily -
— — — — — — — — _ — — — — —
Summer
Max)
1025 1.42 48.9 36.1 0,06 1.36 3.70 5.06 1.23 1.45 2,68 —

6.720 6,720 0.27 0.10 6,745
!026 1.02 19.7 17.8 0.03 0.69 0.62 1.31 0.65 0.15 0.80 — 3,333 3,333 0.12 0.10 3,368
;027 1.00 19.6 17.6 0.03 0.69 0.62 1,31 0.65 0.15 0.80 — 3,313 3,313 0.12 0.09 3,347
o CO 59.1 19.6 17.4 0.03 0.69 0.62 1.31 0.65 0.15 0.80 3,294 3,294 0.12 0.09 3,327 11/85
352
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
3aily -
'Vinter
Max)
>024 0.78 25.1 18.7 0.03 0.79 0.19 0.98 0.71 0.04 0.75
>025 1.41 48.9 36.0 0.06 1.36 7.76 8.88 1.23 3.96 4.98
>026 0.98 19.7 17.2 0.03 0.69 0.62 1.31 0.65 0.15 0.80
>027 0.94 19.7 17.0 0.03 0.69 0.62 1.31 0.65 0.15 0.80
>028 59.1 19.7 16.8 0.03 0.69 0.62 1.31 0.65 0.15 0.80
\verage
Daily
— — — — — — — — — —
>024 0.05 1.47 1.10 < 0.005 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.04 <0.005 0.04 >025 0.79 22.1 17.3 0.03 0.67 1.62 2.29 0.62 0.66 1.29
>026 0.70 14.1 12.3 0.02 0.50 0.43 0.93 0.46 0.10 0.57
>027 0.69 14.0 12.2 0.02 0.50 0.43 0.93 0.46 0.10 0.57
>028
\nnual
!024

9.23 7.25 6.23 0.01 0.28 0.18 0.46 0.26 0.04 0.30

0.01 0.27 0.20 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 >025 0.14 4.03 3.15 0.01 0.12 0.30 0.42 0.11 0.12 0.24
>026 0.13 2.57 2.25 < 0.005 0.09 0.08 0.17 0.08 0.02 0.10 >027 0.13 2.56 2.22 < 0.005 0.09 0.06 0.17 0.06 0.02 0.10 >028 1.69 1.32 1.14 < 0.005 0.05 0.03 0.08 0.05 0.01 0.06 & Behymer Project Custonn Report, 6/20/2i
3,615 3,615 0.15 0.05 3.633

6.706 6,706 0.27 0.10 6,731
3,270 3,270 0.13 0.10 3,302
3,251 3,251 0.13 0.10 3,283
3,233 3,233 0.13 0.10 3,265
212 212 0.01 < 0.005 213
3,244 3,244 0.13 0.05 3,264
2,348 2,348 0.09 0.07 2,372
2,335 2,335 0.09 0.07 2,356
1,114 1,114 0.04 0.03 1,124

35.2 35.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 35.3
537 537 0.02 0.01 540
389 389 0.01 0.01 393
387 387 0.01 0.01 390
185 185 0.01 < 0.005 186
:.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
Iriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2 5D PW2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 3aily - —
Jummer
Max)
>025 1.42 48.9 36.1 0.06 0.20 3.70 3.90 0.18 1.45
12/65

1.64 6.720 6,720 0.27 0.10 6,745
353
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 ;026 1,02 19.7 17.8 0.03 0.11 0.62 0.72 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 3,333 3,333 0.12 0.10 3,368
;027 1.00 19.6 17.6 0.03 0.11 0.62 0.72 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 3,313 3,313 0.12 0.09 3,347
>028 59.1 19.6 17.4 0.03 0.11 0.62 0.72 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 3,294 3,294 0.12 0.09 3,327
)ally -
/Vinler
Max)
>024 0.78 25.1 18.7 0.03 0.12 0.19 0.31 0.11 0.04 0,15 — 3,615 3,615 0.15 0.05 3,633
>025 1.41 46.9 36.0 0.06 0.20 7.76 7.93 0.18 3.96 4.11 — 6,706 6,706 0.27 0.10 6,731
>026 0.98 19.7 17.2 0.03 0.11 0.62 0.72 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 3,270 3,270 0.13 0.10 3,302
>027 0.94 19.7 17.0 0.03 0.11 0.62 0.72 0.10 0.15 0.25 — 3,251 3,251 0.13 0.10 3,283
>028 59.1 19.7 16.8 0.03 0.11 0.62 0.72 0.10 0.15 0.25 - 3,233 3,233 0.13 0.10 3,265
Xverage
:>aily
>024 0.05 1.47 1.10 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 <0.005 0.01 — 212 212 0.01 < 0.005 213
>025 0.79 22.1 17.3 0.03 0.10 1.62 1.72 0.09 0.68 0.77 — 3,244 3,244 0.13 0.05 3,264
>026 0.70 14.1 12.3 0.02 0.08 0.43 0.51 0.07 0.10 0.18 — 2,348 2,348 0.09 0.07 2.372
>027 0.69 14.0 12.2 0.02 0.08 0.43 0.51 0.07 0.10 0.18 — 2,335 2,335 0.09 0.07 2,358
>028
Xnnual
>024

9.23 7.25 6.23 0.01 0.04 0.18 0.23 0.04 0.04 0.08 —
1,114 1,114 0.04 0.03 1,124

0.01 0.27 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 35.2 35.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 35,3 >025 0.14 4.03 3.15 0.01 0.02 0.30 0.31 0.02 0.12 0.14 — 537 537 0.02 0.01 540
>026 0.13 2.57 2.25 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 369 389 0.01 0.01 393
>027 0.13 2.56 2.22 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.03 - 387 387 0.01 0.01 390
>028 1.69 1.32 1.14 <0.005 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 185 185 0.01 <0.005 186 :.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for dally, lylT/yr for annual) JnMit ROG PMIOE PMlOD PM10T PW2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 13/85
354
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report. 6/20/202 )aily.
summer
Max]
Jnmit. 21.8 6.82 72.2 0.14 0.11 11.9 12.0 0.10 3.02 3.12 148 15,907 16,055 15.7 0.78 16,723

21.8 6.82 72.2 0.14 0.11 11.9 12.0 0.10 3.02 3.12 144 15,867 16,010 15.2 0.77 16,664 deduced
— — — — — — — — — —
3% < 0.5% <0.5% 3% 1% <0.5%
)aily,
Writer
Max)
Jnmit. 19.5 7,60 50.2 0.13 0.10 11.9 12.0 0.10 3.02 3.11 148 14,687 14,835 15.8 0.83 15,480 ^it. 19.5 7.60 50.2 0.13 0.10 11.9 12.0 0.10 3.02 3.11 144 14,647 14,791 15.3 0.82 15,422 deduced
— — — — — — — — — — 3% < 0.5% <0.5% 3% 1% <0.5%
Werage
Daily
Max)
Jnmit. 20.3 7.23 57.3 0.13 0.11 11.7 11.8 0.10 2.97 3.07 148 14,966 15,114 15.7 0.80 15,766 i^it. 20.3 7.23 57.3 0,13 0.11 11.7 11.8 0.10 2.97 3.07 144 14,926 15,069 15.3 0.79 15,707 deduced
— — — — — — — — — — 3% <0.5% < 0.5% 3% 1% < 0.5%
\nnual
Max)
Jnmit. 3.70 1.32 10.5 0.02 0.02 2.14 2.16 0.02 0.54 0.56 24.5 2,478 2,502 2.60 0.13 2,610 i^it. 3.70 1.32 10.5 0.02 0.02 2.14 2.16 0.02 0.54 0.56 23.8 2,471 2,495 2.53 0.13 2,601 ■/<• — — — — — —
3% < 0.5% < 0.5% 3% 1% < 0.5%
deduced
:.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Iriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) PMIOD PM10T PM2 5E PM2 50 PW2.5T BC02
14/85
NBC02 C02T
355
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 }aily,
Summer
Max)
— — —
/obile 8.44 6.68 57.1 0.14 0.10 11.9 12.0 0.10 3.02 3.11 — 14,292 14,292 0.57 0.70 14,554
\rea 13.3 0.14 15.1 <0.005 0.01 —

0.01 0.01 —

0.01 0.00 130 130 0.02 <0.005 131
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 —

0.00 —
1,389 1,369 0.22 0.03 1,403
Water — — — — — — — — — —

20.5 95.8 116 2.12 0.05 185
Waste — — — — — — - — — —
127 0.00 127 12.7 0.00 446
Sefrlg. — - — — — — - — — — — — — — —

3.71 fetal 21.8 6.82 72.2 0.14 0.11 11.9 12.0 0.10 3.02 3.12 148 15,907 16,055 15.7 0,78 16,723 Daily,
Winter
Max)
— — — — — — — —
/obile 7.50 7.60 50.2 0.13 0.10 11.9 12.0 0.10 3.02 3.11 — 13,112 13,112 0.67 0.75 13,352
\rea 12.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 89.6 89.6 0.01 < 0.005 90.5
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 —

0.00 —
1,389 1,389 0.22 0.03 1,403
Water — — — — — — — — — —

20.5 95.8 116 2.12 0.05 185
Waste — — — — — — — — — —
127 0.00 127 12.7 0.00 446
Seftig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

3.71 fetal 19.5 7.60 50.2 0.13 0.10 11.9 12.0 0.10 3.02 3.11 148 14,687 14,835 15.8 0.83 15,480 Werage
^aily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
i^ebile 7.62 7.16 49.8 0.13 0.10 11.7 11.8 0.10 2.97 3.07 — 13,441 13,441 0.62 0.72 13,688
\rea 12.7 0.07 7.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 —
< 0.005 < 0.005 —
< 0.005 0.00 40.0 40.0 <0.005 < 0.005 40.3
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —

0.00 —
1,389 1,389 0.22 0.03 1,403
Water — — — — — — — — — -

20.5 95.8 116 2.12 0.05 185
Waste — — — — — — - — — —
127 0.00 127 12.7 0.00 446
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

3.71 fetal 20.3 7.23 57.3 0.13 0.11 11.7 11.8 0.10 2.97 3.07 148 14,966 15,114 15.7 0.80 15,766 15/85
356
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
i^obiie 1.39 1.31 9.09 0.02 0.02 2.14 2.18 0.02 0.54 0.56 — 2,225 2.225 0.10 0.12 2,266
\rea 2.31 0.01 1.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 -< 0.005 < 0.005 -< 0.005 0.00 6.63 6.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.67 •nergy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 —

0.00 —
230 230 0.04 < 0.005 232
fVater — — ~ — — ~ _ — — —

3.40 15.9 19.3 0.35 0.01 30.6
A/aste — - — - — — — — — —21.1 0.00 21.1 2.11 0.00 73.8 Refrig. — — — — — — - — — — — - — - -

0.62 fotal 3.70 1.32 10.5 0.02 0.02 2.14 2.16 0.02 0.54 0.56 24.5 2,478 2,502 2.60 0.13 2,610 :.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ector ROG NOx
)aily,
5umm0r
Max)
PM10E PM100 PM10T PM2.5E PM2 5D PM2 5T BC02 NBC02 |C02T CH-I Mobile 8.44 6.68 57.1 0.14 0.10 11.9 12.0 0.10 3.02 3.11 — 14,292 14,292 0.57 0.70 14,554
Uea 13.3 0.14 15.1 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 -0.01 0.00 130 130 0.02 < 0.005 131 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 -

0.00 —
1,387 1,387 0.22 0.03 1,401
Vater — — — - - — - — - —16.5 57.7 74.1 1.70 0.04 129
fVaste — — — — — — — — — — 127 0.00 127 12.7 0.00 446
^efrig. — - - — — — — — — — — — - - — 3.71
fotal 21.8 6.82 72.2 0.14 0.11 11.9 12.0 0.10 3.02 3.12 144 15,867 16,010 15.2 0.77 16,664 Daily,
Winter
Max)
" " " " " " " " " " "
Mobile 7.50 7.60 50.2 0.13 0.10 11.9 12.0 0.10 3.02 3.11 — 13,112 13,112 0.67 0.75 13,352
^rea 12.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 89.6 89.6 0.01 < 0.005 90.5 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 —0.00 —
1,387 1,387 0.22 0.03 1,401
fVater 16.5 57.7 74.1 1.70 0.04 129
16/85
357
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 fl/aste — — — — —
^efrig. — — — — -
rotal 19.5 7.60 50.2 0.13 0.10
\verage
7aily
— — — — —
i^obile 7.62 7.16 49.8 0.13 0.10
Xrea 12.7 0.07 7.46 < 0.005 < 0.005
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Nater — — — - -
fVastd — — — — —
^efrig. — — — — -
Total 20.3 7.23 57.3 0.13 0.11
Annual — — — - —
•Aobile 1.39 1.31 9.09 0.02 0.02
\rea 2.31 0.01 1.36 < 0.005 < 0.005
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
'Vater — - — — —
/Vaste — — — — —
^efrtg. - — — - -
Total 3.70 1.32 10.5 0.02 0.02

11.9 11.7

11.7 2.14

2.14 12.0

11.8 < 0.005

0.00 11.8

2.16 <0.005

0.00 2.16

0.10 0.10
< 0.005

0.00 0.10

0.02 < 0.005

0.00 0.02

3.02 2.97

2.97 0.54

0.54 127

3.11 144

3.07 —
< 0.005 0.00

0.00 3.07

0.00 0.56
i. Construction Emissions Details

1.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Jriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Dnsite —

16.5 127
144

0.56 —
<0.005 0.00

2.72 21.1

23.8 0.00 127 12.7 0.00 446
— — — — 3.71
14,647 14,791 15.3 0.82 15,422
13,441 13,441 0.62 0.72 13,668

40.0 40.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 40.3
1,387 1.387 0.22 0.03 1,401

57.7 74.1 1.70 0.04 129

0.00 127 12.7 0.00 446
— — — — 3.71
14,926 15,069 15.3 0.79 15,707
2,225 2,225 0.10 0.12 2,266

6.63 6.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.67
230 230 0.04 < 0.005 232

9.55 12.3 0.28 0.01 21.3

0.00 21.1 2.11 0.00 73.8
— — - - 0.62
2,471 2,495 2.53 0.13 2,601
17/85
358
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Daily, —
Summer
Max)
Dally, —
Winter
Max)
Dff-Road 0.72
Equipment
Demolition —
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Werage —
Jally
Dff-Road 0.04
Equipment
Demolition —
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
\nnual —
Dff-Road 0.01
Equipment
Demolition —
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Dffsite —
Daily, —
Summer
Max)
Daily, —
A/inter
Max)
Worker 0.06
/endor 0.00

24.9 18.2 0.03 0.79 0.79 0.71

0.08 0.08

0.71 0.01 0.01
3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 3,437

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.46 1.07 <0.005 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 201 201 0.01 < 0.005 202 — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.27 0.19 <0.005 0.01
— — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 33.3 33.3 <0.005 <0.005 33.4
< 0.005 < 0.005 _

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.05 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

82.4 82.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 83.7

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
18/85
359
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 ^auting <0.005 0.14
\verage — —
}aily
Worker
/endor
Hauling
\nnuai
Worker
/endor
Hauling
< 0.005

0.00 < 0.005
< 0.005

0.00 < 0.005
<0.005

0.00 0.01
<0.005

0.00 < 0.005

0.03 0.03

0.00 <0.005

0.01 0.00
< 0.005
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03

0.00 0.00
< 0.005

0.00 0.00
< 0.005

0.00 0.00
< 0.005

0.00 0.00
< 0.005
<0.005

0.00 <0.005
< 0.005

0.00 < 0.005

0.03 < 0.005

0.00 <0.005
<0.005

0.00 <0.005
< 0.005 0.01

0.00 0.00
<0.005

0.00 0.00
< 0.005
< 0.005

0.00 < 0.005
<0.005

0.00 < 0.005

0.01 < 0.005

0.00 < 0.005
< 0.005

0.00 < 0.005
107 107 <0.005 0.02 112

5.01 5.01 <0.005 <0.005 5.10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

6.28 6.26 <0.005 <0.005 6.59

0.83 0.83 <0.005 < 0.005 0.84

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.04 1.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.09

1.2. Demolition (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for dally, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for dally, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx S02 PMIOE PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 N20 C02e Dnsite —
)aily, —
summer
Max}
)aily. —
Winter
Max}
Dff-Road 0.72
Equipment
)emolition —
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Xverage —
}aily
:>tf-Road 0.04
Equipment

24.9 0.00
ie.2

0.00 0.03

0.00 0.12

0.00 0.08

0.00 0.12

0.08 0.00

0.11 0.00

0.01 0.00

1.46 1.07 <0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01

0.11 0.01

0.00 0.01
3,425 3.425 0.14 0.03 3,437

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
201 201 0.01 <0.005 202
19/65
360
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Demolition —
Dnslte
ruck

0.00 \nnual —
Dff-Road
Equipment

0.01 Demolition —
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 0.00

0.27 0.00
Dffsite —
Daily, —
Summer
De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202

0.00 0.19

0.00 0.00 0.00
<0.005 <0.005 —

0.00 0.00 0.00
< 0.005 < 0.005

0.00 0.00
< 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 —

0.00 0.00
< 0.005

0.00 < 0.005

0.00 0.00
< 0.005

0.00 < 0.005 —
< 0.005

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

33.3 33.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 33.4

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max)
Daily.
(Vinter
Max)
A/orker 0.08 0.05 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 —

82.4 82.4 <0.005 < 0.005 83.7
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling <0.005 0.14 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 107 107 < 0.005 0.02 112
\verage
Daily
A/orker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 <0.005 < 0.005 —

5.01 5.01 < 0.005 <0.005 5.10
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling
\nnual
A/orker
<0.005 0.01 <0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 <0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —

6.28 6.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.59
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —

0.83 0.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.84
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —

1.04 1.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.09
i.3. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated
20/85
361
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 )riteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annuai) PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T
Ensile — — — — —
3aily, — — — — —
Summer
Max}
Jaily, — — — — —
Winter
Max)
Dff-Road 0.72 24.9 18.2 0.03 0.79
Equipment
Semolition — — — — —

0.79 0.71

0.08 0.08

0.71 0.01 0.01
Dnsite 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — ruck
\verage — — — — —
Saily
Dff-Road 0.06 2.00 1.46 <0.005 0.06
Equipment
Semolition — — — — —

0.06 0.06 — 0.06

0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 —
Dnsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ruck
\nnual — — — — —
Dff-Road 0.01 0.37 0.27 < 0.005 0.01
Equipment
demolition — — — — —

0.01 0.01 0.01
<0.005 < 0.005 — <0.005 <0.005 —
dnsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ruck
dffsite — — — — — — — —
Summer
Max)
3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 3,437

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
275 275 0.01 <0.005 276

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

45.5 45.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 45.7

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
21/85
362
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 3aily,
/Vinter
Max)
Vorker
/endor
-lauling
Xverage
)aily
Worker
/endor
-fauling
Xnnual
Worker
/endor
-lauling

0.06 0.04 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 —80.7 80.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 82.0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 0.13 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —105 105 < 0.005 0.02 110 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.71 6.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.82

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —6.42 8.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 <0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.11 1.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.13

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.39 1.39 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.46

1.4. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx S02 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 N20 C02e Dnsite —
)aiiy, —
summer
Max)
)ai!y, —
Winter
Max)
Dff-Road 0.72
Equipment
)emolition —

24.9 18.2 0.03 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11
— — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.01 0.01
3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 3,437
22/85
363
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Dnsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ruck
3aily
Dff-Road 0.06 2.C0 1.46 <0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 275 275 0.01 <0.005 276 Equipment
Demolition — — — — — o.01 0.01 — <0.005 <0.005 _ — — — _ — Dnsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ruck
Dff-Road 0.01 0.37 0.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 45.5 45.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 45.7 Equipment
Demolition — — — — —< 0.005 < 0.005 —
< 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — —
Dnsite
ruck
Dffsite

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Summer
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Afinter
Max)
/Vorker 0.06 0.04 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 —

80.7 80.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 82,0
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-lauling < 0.005 0.13 0.03 < 0.005 <0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 105 105 < 0.005 0.02 110
Werage
Dally
A/orker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —

6.71 6.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.82
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-lauling
Annual
Aforker
< 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 <0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —

8.42 8.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.82
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.11 1.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.13 23/85
364
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 /endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 ;.5. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
iriterla Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.39 1.39 <0.005 < 0.005 1.46
ROG NOx
Onsite —
Jaily, —
Jummer
Max)
Daily, —
fl/inter
Max)
Dff-Road 1.07
Equipment
Dust From —
Material
■Movement
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Werage —
Daily
Dff-Road 0.09
Equipment
Dust From —
Material
ilovement
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
\nnual —
Dff-Road 0.02
Equipment
PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5e PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4

39.9 28.3 0.05 1.12 — 1.12
— — — — 7.67 7.67

1.02 — 1.02
— 3.94 3.94

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.28 2.33 < 0.005 0.09 — 0.09
— — — — 0.63 0.63

0.08 — 0.08
— 0.32 0.32

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.60 0.42 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 0.02

5.295 5.295 0.21 0.04 5.314

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
435 435 0.02 < 0.005 437

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.02 — 72.1 72.1 <0.005 <0.005 72.3
24/85
365
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 3ust From
Material
.dovement

0.11 0.11 0.06 0.06
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Dffsite — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
)aiiy,
Summer
Max]
~~ — — — — — — — — — —
:>aily,
Winier
Max)
" " — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.05 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 94-2 94 2 < 0.005 < 0.005 95.6
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Werage
)aily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < o.oos 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —

8.02 8.02 <0.005 < 0.005 8.15
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
\nnual — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 <0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 <0.005 < 0.005 0.00 <0.005 < 0.005 —

1.33 1.33 <0.005 < 0.005 1.35
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.6. Site Preparation (2025) - Mitigated
;riteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG MO. t;o so?
Dnsite —
25/65
366
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Summer
Max)
A/inter
Max)
Dff-Road 1.07 39.9 28.3 0.05 0.17 — 0.17 0.15 — 0.15 — 5,295 5,295 0.21 0.04 5,314 Equipment
Just From — _ _ — — 7.67 7.67 — 3.94 3.94 _ _ _ _ _ _
4aterial
i/lovement
Jnsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ruck
Jaily
Jff-Road 0.09 3.28 2.33 <0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 435 435 0.02 < 0.005 437 Equipment
Just From — _ _ _ — 0.63 0.63 — 0.32 0.32 _ _ _ _ _ _
lAaterial
lAovement
Jnsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ruck
Dff-Road 0.02 0.60 0.42 <0.005 <0.005 — <0.005 <0.005 — <0.005 — 72.1 72.1 <0.005 <0.005 72.3 Equipment
Just From _ _ _ _ _ 0.11 0.11 — 0.06 0.06 _ _ _ _ _ _
<Aaterial
(Movement
Jnsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ruck
Summer
Max)
26/85
367
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 )aily,
Winter
Max)
Worker 0.07 0.05 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 /endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 \verage
Oaiiy
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 /endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling
\nnual
Worker

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 /endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.7. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Ylterla Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx
Dnsite —
Jaily, —
5ummer
Max)
Dff-Road 1.33
Equipment
)ust From —
i^aterial
tiovement
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 46.6

0.00 35.3 0.06 1.36 — 1.36 1.23 — 1.23
— — — 3.59 3.59 — 1.42 1.42

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

94.2 94.2 <0.005 < 0.005 95.6

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

8.02 6.02 <0.005 < 0.005 6.15

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.33 1.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.35

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NBC02 C02T CH4 N20 C02e

6.599 6,599 0.27 0.05 6,622

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
27/85
368
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 3aily, —
A/inter
Max)
Dff-Road 1.33
zquipment
lustFrom —
<Aaterial
Movement
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Vverage —
Daily
Dff-Road 0.27
Equipment
Dust From —
/aterial
lAovement
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Xnnual —
Dff-Road O.OS
Equipment
Dust From —
lAaterlai
lAovement
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Dffsite —
Daily, —
Summer
Max)

48.8 35.3 0.06

0.00 1.36

3.59 1.36

3.59 1.23

1.42 10.0 7.26 0.01 0.28

0.74 0.28

0.74 0.25

0.29 1.83 1.33 <0.005 0.05

0.13 0.05

0.13 0.05 —

0.05 1.23

1.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.25 0.29

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.05 0.05

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 6,622

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,356 1,356 0.06 0.01 1,361

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
224 224 0.01 < 0.005 225

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
iVorker 0.09 0.05 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 O.CO 0.03 0.03 — 121 121 < 0.005 0.01 123
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
28/85
369
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Daily,
fl/inter
Max]
Worker 0.08 0.05 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.03 0.03 -108 108 <0.005 0.01 109 /endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
\verage
Daily
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 -22.9 22.9 <0.005 < 0.005 23.3 /endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling
Annual
Worker

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 <0.005 < 0.005 —

3.79 3.79 <0.005 < 0.005 3.85
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.8. Grading (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx PM10E PMIOD PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 3nsite —
Jaily. —
summer
Max)
Dff-Road 1.33
Equipment
Dust From —
Material
tlovement
Drsite
ruck

0.00 48.8

0.00 35.3 0.06 0.20 — 0.20 0.18 — 0.18
— — — 3.59 3.59 — 1.42 1.42

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6,599

0.00 6,599

0.00 0.27

0.00 0.05

0.00 6,622

0.00 29/85
370
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

Daily, —
Winter
Max)
3ff-Road 1.33
Equipment
Dust From —
i4aterial
(Movement
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Vverage —
Daily
Dff-Road 0.27
Equipment
Dust From —
)4aterial
Movement
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
\nnual —
3ff-Road 0.05
Equipment
Dust From —
(Material
Movement
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Dffsite —
Daily, —
Summer
Max)
De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202

48.8 35.3 0.06 0.20

3.59 0.20

3.59 0.18

10.0 7.26 0.01 0.04

0.74 0.74

1.83 1.33 <0.005 0.01

0.13 0.01

0.13 0.01

1.42 0.04 0.04 —

0.05 0.18

1.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.04 —

0.29 0.29 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00

0.01 0.05

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 6,622

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,356 1,356 0.08 0.01 1,361

0.00 0.00 0.00 O.CO 0.00
224 224 0.01 < 0.005 225

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Worker 0.09 0.05 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 121 121 < 0.C05 0.01 123
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
30/85
371
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 :}aily,
/Vinter
Max)
'
Worker 0.08 0.05 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 108 108 < 0.005 0.01 109
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
■tauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Vverage
)aily
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 —

22.9 22.9 < 0.005 <0.005 23.3
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling
Xnnuai
Worker

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.79 3.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.85 /endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Yiteria Pollutants {lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 Jnsite —
>aily, —
jummer
Max)
3ff-Road 0.62
iquipment
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 18.9 14.3

0.00 0.00

0.02 0.69 — 0.69 0.64 — 0.64

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
2,396 2,398 0.10 0.02 2,406

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
)aily. —
A/inter
Max)
31 /85
372
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Dff-Road 0.62
Equipment
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
\verage —
Daily
Dff-Road 0.21
Equipment
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 \nnual —

18.9 0.00

6.46 0.00

14.3 0.00

4.80 0.00

0.02 0.00

0.01 0.00

0.69 0.00

0.24 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.69 0.00

0.24 0.00

0.64 0.00

0.22 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.64 0.00

0.22 0.00
2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 2,406

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
821 821 0.03 0.01 824

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Dff-Road
Equipment

0.04 1.18 0.89 < 0.005 0.04 —

0.04 0.04 0.04 136 136 0.01 < 0.005 136
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dffsite — — - — - — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
Max)
A/orker 0.41 0.22 3.56 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 581 581 0.02 0.02 591
/endor 0.02 0.60 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 374 374 0.01 0.06 392
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
Vinter
Max)
iVorker 0.36 0.26 2.89 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 515 515 0.02 0.02 523
/endor 0.02 0.64 0.28 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 375 375 0.01 0.06 391
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
\verage
Daily
Worker 0.13 0.08 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 183 183 0.01 0.01 186
/errdor 0.01 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 <0.005 0.01 0.01 — 128 128 <0.005 0.02 134
32/85
373
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Xnnual — — — — — - - - — — — — — — — —
A/orker 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 —

30.3 30.3 <0.005 < 0.005 30.6
/endor < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 -

21.2 21.2 <0.005 < 0.005 22.2
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
;.10. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated
Jriteria Pollutants (lb/day otr dally, ton/yr otr annual) and GHGs (lb/day otr daily, MT/yr for annual) Dnsite —
Jaily. —
jummer
Max)
5ff-Road 0.62
iquipment
Dnslie 0.00
ruck
)aily. —
fl/inter
Max)
:ff-Road 0.62
Equiprrienl
Dnsile 0.00
ruck
\v0rage —
3aily
5ff-Road 0.21
Equipment
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Vnnual —

18.9 14.3 0.02 0.10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
— 0.10 0.10 — 0.10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

18.9 14.3 0.02 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

6.46 4.90 0.01 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 2,406

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 2.406

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
821 821 0.03 0.01 824

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
33/85
374
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Dff-Road
Equipment

0.04 1.18 0.89 <0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 —
136 136 0.01 < 0.005 136
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dffsite - — — — — — — - — — - — - - — —
itaily.

Summer
Max)
" " " " " " " " " "
A/orker 0.41 0.22 3.56 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 —581 581 0.02 0.02 591 /endor 0.02 0.60 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 -374 374 0.01 0.06 392 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
)aily,
A/inter
Max)
Worker 0.36 0.26 2.89 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 515 515 0.02 0.02 523
/endor 0.02 0.64 0.28 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 —375 375 0.01 0.06 391 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Werage
}aily
Worker 0.13 0.08 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 183 183 0.01 0.01 186
/endor 0.01 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 128 128 <0.005 0.02 134
Hauling
^nual
Worker

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.02 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 —

30.3 30.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8
/endor < 0.005 0.04 0.02 <0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —

21.2 21.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.2
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.11. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ocalion ROG PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2 5D PM2.5T BC02
34/85
NBC02 C02T
375
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Dnsite —
3aily, —
Summer
Max)
>ff-Road 0.62
Equipment
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
3aily. —
Winter
Max)
3ff-Road 0.62
Equipment
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Werage —
Saily
Dff-Road 0.44
Equipment
3nsite 0.00
ruck
\nnual —
3ff-Road 0.08
Equipment
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
>ffsite —
Daily, —
Summer
Max)

18.9 0.00

18.9 0.00

13.5 0.00

2.46 0.00

14.3 0.00

14.3 0.00

10.2 0.00

1.86 0.00

0.02 0.00

0.02 0.00

0.02 0.00

0.69 0.00

0.69 0.00

0.49 0.00
< 0.005 0.09

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.69 0.00

0.69 0.00

0.49 0.00

0.09 0.00

0.64 0.00

0.64 0.00

0.46 0.00

0.08 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.64 0.00

0.64 0.00

0.46 0.00

0.08 0.00
2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 2,405

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 2,405

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 1,718

0.00 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 284

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Worker 0.38 0.20 3.28 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 568 568 0.02 0.02 578
/endor 0.02 0.58 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 367 367 0.01 0.08 385
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.CO
35/85
376
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Jaily,
A/inter
Max)
Worker 0.34 0.24 2.65 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 —505 505 0.02 0.02 513 /endor 0.02 0.62 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 368 366 0.01 0.06 384
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Werage
Oaily
Worker 0.25 0.16 1.93 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 373 373 0.01 0.02 380
/endor 0.01 0.43 0.19 < 0.005 <0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 —262 262 0.01 0.04 275 Hauling
\ ni^i fsl

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AiltlUal
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 —61.8 61.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 62.8 /endor < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 <0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 <0.005 < 0.005 —43.4 43.4 < 0.005 0.01 45.4 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
:.12. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants {lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 Dnsrte —
Jaily, —
>ummer
Max)
Dff-Road 0.62
Equipment
Dnsrte
ruck

0.00 18.9 14.3 0.02 0.10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
— 0.10 0.10 — 0.10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 2,405

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Jaily, —
Vinter
Max)
36/85
377
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/2 Dff-Road 0.62 18.9 14.3 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 2,405 Equipment
3nsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ruck
\verage
Daily
>ff-Road 0.44 13.5 10.2 0.02 0.07 —

0.07 0.07 0.07 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 1,718
Equipment
Dnsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ruck
Vnnual
Dff-Road 0.08 2.46 1.86 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 284 Equipment
Dnsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ruck
Dffsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, — — — — —
Summer
Max)
Worker 0.38 0.20 3.28 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 568 568 0.02 0.02 578 /endor 0.02 0.58 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 367 367 0.01 0.06 385 -lauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 O.CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, — — _
A/inter
Max)
Worker 0.34 0.24 2.65 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 505 505 0.02 0.02 513 /endor 0.02 0.62 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 368 368 0.01 0.06 384 -lauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — O.CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Werage — — — — __
Daily
Worker 0.25 0.16 1.93 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 373 373 0.01 0.02 380 /endor 0.01 0.43 0.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 262 262 0.01 0.04 275 37/85
378
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Hauling
Vnni ifil

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MII lUal
Worker 0.04 0,03 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 /endor < 0.005 0.06 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

61.8 61.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 62.8

43.4 43.4 < 0.005 0.01 45.4

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.13. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for dally, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2 5E PM2 50 |PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T Cl-14 Onsite —
Daily. —
jummer
Max}
Off-Road 0.62
iquipmenl
Onsite 0.00
rudt
Dally, —
Winter
Max)
Dff-Road 0.62
Equipment
Dnslle 0.00
ruck
\verag8 —
Dally
Dff-Road 0.44
Equipment
Dnslte 0.00
ruck
\nnual —

16.9 14.3 0.02 0.69

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

18.9 14.3 0.02 0.69

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

13.5 10.2 0.02 0.49

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
— 0.69 0.64 — 0.64

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
— 0.69 0.64 — 0.64

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
— 0.49 0.46 — 0.46

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 2,405

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 2,405

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,712 1.712 0.07 0.01 1,718

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
38/85
379
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Dff-Road
•quipment
Dnsite
ruck

0.08 0.00
3ffsite —
Daily, —
summer
Max)

2.46 0.00

1.86 0.00
< 0.005

0.00 0.09

0.00 0.00

0.09 0.00

0.08 0.06

0.00 0.00 0.00
283

0.00 283

0.00 0.01

0.00 <0.005

0.00 1.14. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx PM10E PM10D PMIor PM2.5E |PM2 5D PM2.5T |BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 39/85
284

0.00 iVorker 0.36 0.18 3.03 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 557 557 0.01 0.02 566
/endor 0.02 0.56 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 359 359 0.01 0.05 376
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily,
VInter
Max)
" " " " " — — — — — — "
Vorker 0.30 0.22 2.46 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 494 494 0.02 0.02 502
/endor 0.02 0.60 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 360 360 0.01 0.05 376
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Vverage
Dally
Vorker 0.23 0.14 1.78 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 366 366 0.01 0.02 372
/endor 0.01 0.42 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 257 257 0.01 0.04 266
Hauling
Xnnual
Worker

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.04 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 60.5 60.5 <0.005 < 0.005 61.6 /endor <0.005 0.08 0.03 <0.005 <0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 <0.005 < 0.005 —

42.5 42.5 < 0.005 0.01 44.4
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
380
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Dnsite —
Daily, —
jummer
Max)
Dff-Road 0.62
Equipment
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Daily, —
Winter
Max)
Dff-Road 0.62
Equipment
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 Werage —
Daily
Dff-Road 0.44
Equipment
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
\nnual —
Dff-Road 0.08
Equipment
O.CO
Dffsite —
Dnsite
ruck
Daily, —
Summer
Max)

18.9 0.00

18.9 0.00

13.5 0.00

2.46 0.00

14.3 0.00

14.3 0.00

10.2 0.00

1.86 0.00

0.02 0.00

0.02 0.00

0.02 0.00

0.10 0.00

0.10 0.00

0.07 0.00
< 0.005 0.01

0.00 0.00
O.CO
O.CO

0.00 0.00

0.10 0.00

0.10 0.00

0.07 0.00

0.01 0.00

0.10 0.00

0.10 0.00

0.07 0.00

0.01 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.10 —

0.00 —

0.10 0.00

0.07 0.00

0.01 0.00
2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 2,405

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 2,405

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 1,718

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
283 283 0.01 < 0.005 284

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Worker 0.36 0.18 3.03 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 557 557 0.01 0.02 566
/endor 0.02 0.56 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 359 359 0.01 0.05 376
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
40/85
381
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/i Oaily,
Winter
Max)
— — - - — - — - — — - - — — — -
Worker 0.30 0.22 2.46 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 494 494 0.02 0.02 502 /endor 0.02 0.60 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 360 360 0.01 0.05 376 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Werage
)aily
Worker 0.23 0.14 1.78 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 366 366 0.01 0.02 372 /endor 0.01 0.42 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 257 257 0.01 0.04 268 Hauling
Annual
Worker

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.04 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 60.5 60.5 <0.005 < 0.005 61.6 /endor < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 42.5 42.5 <0.005 0.01 44.4 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ;.15. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for dally, MT/yr for annual) PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2 50 PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T
Dnsite —
Jaily, —
>ummer
Max)
Dff-Road 0.62
Equipment
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 18.9 14.3 0.02 0.69 — 0.69 0.64 — 0.54

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2.397 2.397 0.10 0.02 2,406

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3aily. —
Vinter
Max)
41 /85
382
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 3ff-Road 0.62
Equipment
Dnsite 0.00
aick
\verage —
}aiiy
3ff-Road 0.16
Equipment
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 \nnual —
Dff-Road 0.03
Equipment
Jnsite
ruck

0.00 18.9

0.00 4.67

0.00 0.89

0.00 14.3

0.00 3.69

0.00 0.67

0.00 0.02

0.00 0.01

0.00 0.69

0.00 0.18

0.00 0.00

0.00 < 0.005 0.03

0.00 0.00 0.00

0.69 0.00

0.18 0.00

0.03 0.00

0.64 0.00

0.17 0.00

0.03 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.64

0.00 0.17

0.00 0.03

0.00 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 2,406

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 619 619 0.03 0.01 621

0.00 103 103 <0.005 <0.005 103

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Dffsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
)aily,
Summer
Max)
—
Vorker 0.33 0.16 2.82 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 546 546 0.01 0.02 555
/endor 0.02 0.55 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 350 350 0.01 0.05 367
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
)aiiy,
A/inter
Max)
"
Vorker 0.29 0.20 2.28 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 485 485 0.02 0.02 493
/endor 0.02 0.58 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 351 351 0.01 0.05 367
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Werage
)aily
Vorker 0.08 0.05 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 130 130 < 0.005 0.01 132
/endor < 0.005 0.15 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 42/85

0.01 0.01 —90.6 S0.6 < 0.005 0.01 94.8
383
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 \nnual
Vorker 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 21.5 21.5 <0.005 <0.005 21.8 /endor < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.0 15.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 15.7 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.16. Building Construction (2028) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for dally, MT/yr for annual) Dnsite —
3aliy. —
summer
Max)
Dff-Road 0.62
iquipment
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
)aily, —
Vinter
Max)
Dff-Road 0.62
Equipment
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
\verage —
:)aily
3tf-Road 0.16
Equipment
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
\nnual —

18.9 14.3 0.02 0.10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

18.9 14.3 0.02 0.10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.87 3.69 0.01 0.03

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
— 0.10 0.10 — 0.10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
— 0.10 0.10 — 0.10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
— 0.03 0.02 — 0.02

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 2,406

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 2,406

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
619 619 0.03 0.01 621

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
43/85
384
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Dtf-Road
Equipment
0,03 0.89 0.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 103 103 < 0.005 < 0.005 103 Dnsite
ruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dflslte — — — _ — — — — — — — — — — — —
^ally,
summer
Max)
Worker 0.33 0.16 2.82 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 —546 546 0.01 0.02 555 /endor 0.02 0.55 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 —350 350 0.01 0.05 367 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
:)aily,
Winter
Max)
" " " " " " " " " " " " " " "
Worker 0.29 0.20 2.28 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 —485 485 0.02 0.02 493 /endor 0.02 0.58 0,26 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 —351 351 0.01 0.05 367 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
\verage
Daily
Worker 0.08 0.05 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 130 130 <0.005 0.01 132
/endor < 0.005 0.15 0.06 < 0.005 <0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 -90.6 90.6 < 0.005 0.01 94.8 Hauling
\nnual
Worker

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 —21.5 21.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.8 /endor < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —

15.0 15.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 15.7
Hauling 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
i.17. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 44/85
ROG iNOx PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2 5D PM2 5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 385
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 3nsite —
Jaily. —
summer
Max)
>ff-Road 0.50
Equipment

0.00 0.00
'aving
Dnsite
ruck
Daily, —
Winter
Max)
Werage —
Daily
Dff-Road 0.08
Equipment
'aving
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 0.00
Xnnual —
Dff-Road 0.01
Equipment
'aving
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 0.00

13.3 0.00

2.00 0.00

0.37 0.00

10.6 0.00

1.60 0.00

0.29 0.00

0.01 0.00

0.58 0.00
< 0.005 0.09

0.00 0.00
< 0.005 0.02

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.58

0.00 0.09

0.00 0.02

0.00 0.54

0.00 0.08

0.00 0.01

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.54 0.00

0.08 0.00

0.01 0.00 —
1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 1,516

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
228 228 0.01 < 0.005 228

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

37.7 37.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 37.8

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Dffsite —
Daily, —
summer
Max)
Worker 0.05 0.02 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 —

85.5 85.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 86.9
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-lauiing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
45/85
386
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 )aily,
Winter
Max)
\verage
Daily
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 /endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ^tl^lUal
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 <0.005 < 0.005 /endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

11.9 11.9 <0.005 < 0.005 12.0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.96 1.96 <0.005 < 0.005 1.99

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.18. Paving (2028) - Mitigated
iriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for dally, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx
3nsite —
Jaily, —
iummer
Max)
3ff-Road 0.50
Equipment
'aving
Dnsite
ruck
)aily,
Vinter
Max)
Werage
)aiiy

0.00 0.00
PM10E PWIOD PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NDC02 C02T CH4

13.3 0.00

10.6 0.00

0.01 0.00

0.09 0.00 0.00

0.09 0.00

0.08 —

0.00 0.00

0.08 —

0.00 —
1,511

0.00 1,511

0.00 0.06

0.00 0.01

0.00 1,516

0.00 46/85
387
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Dff-Road 0.08 2.00 1.60 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 228 228 0.01 <0.005 228 Equipment
'aving 0.00 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Dnslte 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ruck
Dff-Road 0.01 0.37 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 37.7 37.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 37.8 Equipment
'aving 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3nsite
ruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Dffsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
}aily,
Summer
Max)
— — — — — — — — — —
/Vorker 0.05 0.02 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 —

85.5 85.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 86.9
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
^aily,
Winter
Max)
Werage
}aily
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —

11.9 11.9 < 0.005 <0.005 12.0
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling
\nnual
Worker

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
< 0.005 <0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 <0.005 <0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —

1.96 1.96 <0.005 <0.005 1.99
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
47/85

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
388
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202

1.19. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated
'.rlterla Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs {lb/day for dally, MT/yr for annual) Dnsite —
3aily, —
iummer
Max)
Dff-Road 0.05
Equipment
Xrchitectu 59.0
al
boatings
3nslte 0-00
ruck
3aily. —
Wnter
Max)
Dff-Road 0.05
Equipment
Vrchitectu 59.0
al
^eatings
Dnsite 0.00
ruck
Vverage —
)aily
Dff-Road 0.01
Equipment
\rchitectu 8.89
al
boatings
Dnsite 0.00
ruck

1.09 0.96 <0.005 0.07 0.07 0,06 0.06 — 134 134 0.01 <0.005 134

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.09 0.96 <0.005 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 — 134 134 0.01 <0.005 134

0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.16 0.15 <0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 20.1 20.1 <0.005 <0.005 20.2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48/85
389
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 \nnual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Dff-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 —
< 0.005 < 0.005 —
< 0.005 —3.33 3.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.34
Vrchitectu
al
boatings

1.62 — — — — — — — — - — — — — — —
>isite
ruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Dffsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
)aily,
Summer
Max)
— — — — — — —
A^orker 0.07 0.03 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 109 109 < 0.005 < 0.005 Ill
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.co 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sally,
Winter
Max)
Worker 0.06 0.04 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 —

97.0 97.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 98.5
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Werage
Sally
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 <0.005 —

15.1 15.1 <0.005 < 0.005 15.4
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling
\nnual
Worker

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —

2.51 2.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.54
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
49/85
390
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 ;.20. Architectural Coating (2028) - Mitigated
:riteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx 302 PM10E PMIOD PM10T PM2,5E PM2.5D PM2.5T 8C02 NBC02 C02T CH4 N20 C02e

0.01 0.01 0.01
Onsite — — — — — —
Daily, _ _ _ _ _ _
jummer
Max)
Dff-Road 0.05 1.09 0,96 <0.005 0.01 —
iquipment
\rchitecau 59.0 — — — — — — — — —
al
Doatings
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ruck
Writer
Max)
Dff-Road 0.05 1.09 0.96 <0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 0.01
•quipment
UchHectu 59.0 — — — — — — — — — —
al
Doatings
Dnsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — ruck
Daily ^
Dff-Road 0.01 0.16 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 — <0.005 <0.005 — <0.005 — •quipment
\rchitectu 8.89 — — — — — — — — — —
al
Doatings
Dnslte 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — ruck
134 134 0.01 <0.005 134

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
134 134 0.01 <0.005 134

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

20.1 20.1 <0.005 <0.005 20.2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo
50/85
391
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 \nnual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Dff-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 <0.005 —<0.005 < 0.005 —
< 0.005 —

3.33 3.33 <0.005 < 0.005 3.34
\rchi1ectu
a]
Doatings

1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Dnsite
ruck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.co 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Dffsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
3aily,
Summer
Max)
—
A/orker 0.07 0.03 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 109 109 < 0.005 < 0.005 111
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.co 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Satly,
ATinter
Max)
A/orker 0.06 0.04 0.46 o.co 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 —97.0 97.0 <0.005 < 0.005 98.5 /endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
\verage
}aily
A/orker 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 <0.005 —

15.1 15.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 15.4
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling
\nnual
A/orker

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
<0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 <0.005 —

2.51 2.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.54
/endor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
51/85
392
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 [. Operations Emissions Details
-.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx 302 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 N20 C02e 3aily. —
jummer
Max)
jingle 6.43
-amily
-lousing
yityPark 0.01
rot^ 8.44
3aily. —
Vinter
Max)
jingle 7.50
•amily
-lousing
:ity Park 0.01
rotal 7.50
\nnual —
jingle 1.39
•amily
-lousing

6.67 57.0 0.14 0.10 11.9
< 0.005 0.04

6.68 57.1
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01

0.14 0.10 11.9

7.59 0.01

7.60 1.31

50.1 0.04

50.2 9.09

0.13 0.10 11.9
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01

0.13 0.10 11.9

0.02 0.02 2.14

12.0 0.01

12.0 12.0

0.01 12.0

2.16 0.10 3.01 3.11
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

0.10 3.02 3.11

0.10 3.01 3.11
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005

0.10 3.02 3.11

0.02 0.54 0.56
:ityPark <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 — fotal 1.39 1.31 9.09 0.02 0.02 2.14 2.16 0.02 0.54 0.56 .1.2. Mitigated

14.281 14,281 0.57 0.70 14,544

10.5 10.5 < 0.005 <0.005 10.7

14.292 14,292 0.57 0.70 14,554
13,103 13,103 0.67 0.75 13,343

9.68 9.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 9.85
13,112 13,112 0.67 0.75 13,352
2,224 2,224 0.10 0.12 2,265

0.86 0.86 <0.005 <0.005 0.88
2,225 2,225 0.10 0.12 2.266
52/85
393
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for dally, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NO* S02 PM10E PMIOD PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 N20 C02e Total

3.01 0.10 3.01

0.54 1.39 1.31 9.09 0.02 0.02

3.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

0.10 3.02 3.11
Jummer
Max)
Jingle 8.43 6,67 57.0 0.14 0.10 11.9 12.0 0.10
■amily
-lousing
JityPark 0.01 <0.005 0.04 <0.005 <0,005 0.01 0.01
Total 8.44 6.68 57.1 0.14 0.10 11.9 12.0
Daily, — — — — — — —
Vinter
Max)
Jingle 7.50 7.59 50.1 0.13 0.10 11.9 12.0
■amily
-lousing
DItyPark 0.01 0,01 0.04 <0.005 <0.005 0.01 0.01
Total 7.50 7,60 50.2 0.13 0.10 11,9 12.0
\nnual — — — — — — — —
Jingle 1.39 1.31 9,09 0.02 0.02 2.14 2.16 0.02
-amily
-lousing
DItyPark <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 —

3.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005

0.10 3,02 3.11

0.56 14,281 14,281 0.57 0,70 14,544

2.14 2.16 0.02 0.54 0.56 —

10.5 10.5 <0.005 <0.005 10.7
14,292 14,292 0,57 0.70 14,554
13,103 13,103 0.67 0.75 13,343

9.68 9.68 < 0.005 < 0,005 9.85
13,112 13,112 0.67 0.75 13,352

2.224 2,224 0.10 0.12 2,265

0.86 0.86 <0,005 <0.005 0.88

2.225 2,225 0.10 0.12 2,266
-.2. Energy
.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) PM10O PM10T PM2.5E PM2 5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T
53/85
394
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Summer
Max)
-amily
-lousing
Sity Park — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
Max)
^amily
•lousing
Sity Park — — — — — — — — — —
^amily
-lousing
Sity Park — — — — — — — — — —
rota! — — — — — — — — — —
.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants {lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 1,389 1.389 0.22 0.03 1,403

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,389 1,389 0.22 0.03 1,403

1.389 1,389 0.22 0.03 1,403

0.00 1.389
230

0.00 230

0.00 1,389
230

0.00 230

0.00 0.22

0.04 0.00

0.04 ROG NOx
Jaily, —
Summer
Max)
Single —
-amily
Housing

0.00 0.03

0.00 1,403
< 0.005 232

0.00 0.00
<0.005 232
302 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 N20 C02e 1,387 1,387 0.22 0.03 1,401
54/85
395
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Jity Park —
Total —
)aily, —
Afinter
Max)
jingle —
-amily
-lousing
>ity Park —
Total —
\nnual —
jingle —
-amily
-lousing
vity Park —
Total —

0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00
1,387 1,387 0.22 0,03 1,401
1,387 1,387 0.22
230 230 0.04

0.03 1,401

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
1,387 1,387 0,22 0,03 1,401
< 0.005 232
0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00
230 230 0,04 < 0.005 232
.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 5aily. —
jummer
Max)
jingle 0,00
-amily
-lousing
:ity Park 0,00
Total 0,00
5aily, —
ATinter
Max)
0,00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0,00

0.00 o.oo

0.00 0.00
PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 0,00
0,00

0.00 0,00
0,00

0.00 0.00
o.oo

0.00 0,00 —
0,00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
55/85
396
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 jingle 0.00
■amily
-lousing
3ity Park 0.00
fotai 0.00
\nnual —
jingle 0.00
^amily
Housing
iity Park 0.00
rota! 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 —

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
'fiteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and QHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) }ally.
jummer
Max)
jingle
•amily
Housing
jingie
-amiiy
Housing

0.00 Dity Park 0.00
Total 0.00
3aiiy. —
Winter
Max)

0.00 Dtty Park 0.00
Total 0.00
\nnuai —
PM10E IPMIOD IPMIOT |PM2".F PM2 |PM25T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
56/85

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
397
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Single
•amiiy
-lousing

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00
Jity Park 0.00
Total 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-.3. Area Emissions by Source
.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) oiitce iROG
)aily,
Summer
Max)
PM10E iPf.lMD IPMIOT |PM2.Sc |PM2ED |PM2 5T NBC02 C02T CH4 -(earths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consumer 11.1 — — — —
'roducts
\rchitectu 0.89
al
Soatlngs
.andscap 1.32
I
Squipmen

0.14 15.1 <0.005 0.01
fotai 13.3 0.14 15.1 <0.005 0.01
Daily. _ _ _ _ _
Wnter
Max)
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consumer 11.1 — — — —
>roducts

0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 69.6 89.6 0.01 < 0.005 90.5

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.00 0.00

0.01 40.3 40.3 <0.005 < 0.005 40.5

0.01 0.00 130 130 0.02 <0.005 131

0.00 0.00 89.6 89.6 0.01 < 0.005 90.5
57/85
398
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 ^hitectu 0.89 — — — — —
al
boatings
Total 12.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 Consumer 2.03 — — — — — — — — — —
'roducts
\rchltectu 0.16 — — — — — — — — — —
al
boatings
.andscap 0.12 0.01 1.36 <0.005 <0.005 — <0.005 <0.005 — <0.005 — i
Equipmen
Total 2.31 0.01 1.36 <0.005 < 0.005 — <0.005 <0.005 — <0.005 0.00 .3.2. Mitigated
Yiteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)

0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 89.6 89.6 0.01 < 0.005 90.5

3.33 3.33 <0.005 <0.005 3.37

3.29 3.29 <0.005 <0.005 3.31

6.63 6.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.67
cutce ROG NOx PMIOIE IPMIOD PM10T |PM2.5C IPMSSD |PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 Jaily, _ _ _ _ _
Summer
Max)
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consumer 11.1 — — — —
Products
\rchitectu 0.89 — — — —
al
Soatings

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 89.6 89.6 0.01 <0.005 90.5
.andscap 1.32
>
Equipmen

0.14 15.1 <0.005 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 40.3 40.3 < 0.005 <0.005 40.5 58/85
399
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 rotal 13.3 0.14 15.1 <0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01
Winter
Max)
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00
Consumer 11.1 — — — — — — —
Products
Xrchitectu 0.89 — — — — — — —
al
Coalings
rota!
Annual —
Hearths 0.00
Consumer 2.03
Products
\rchitectu 0.16
al
boatings
.andscap 0.12
i
iqulpmen

12.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00

0.01 0.00 130 130 0.02 <0.005 131

0.00 0.00 89.6 89.6 0.01 < 0.005 90.5

0.00 0.00 89.6 89.6 0.01 < 0.005 90.5

0.00 0.00 3.33 3.33 < 0.005 <0.005 3.37

0.01 1.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 — <0.005 <0.005 — <0.005 — 3.29 3.29 <0.005 <0.005 3.31 rota! 2.31 0.01 1.36 <0.005 <0.005 — <0.005 <0.005 — <0.005 0.00 6.63 6.63 <0.005 <0.005 6.67 -.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs {lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NO* 802 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 N20 C02e )aily. —
jummer
Max)
59/85
400
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Single —
-amily
Housing
Sity Park —
rota! —
Jaily, —
A/inter
Max)
Single —
-amily
Housing
Sity Park —
Total —
\nnual —
Single —
-amily
Housing
SIty Park —
Total —

20.5 94.3

0.00 20.5

20.5 0.00

20.5 3.40
0,00

3.40 1.51

95.8 94.3

1.51 95.8

15.6 0.25

15.9 115

1.51 116
115

1.51 116

19.0 0.25

19.3 2.12 0.05 183
< 0.005 < 0.005 1.52

2.12 0.05 185

2.12 0.35

0.05 183
<0.005 < 0.005 1.52

2.12 0.05 185

0.01 30.4
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.25

0.35 0.01 30.6
.4.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx
3aily, —
Summer
Max)
Single —
•amily
Housing
Sity Park —
Total —
PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2 5E PM2 5D PM2 5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4

16.5 0.00

16.5 58.0
-0.36

57.7 74.5
-0.36

74.1 1.70 0.04 129
> -0.005 > -0.005 -0.37

1.70 0.04 129
60/85
401
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Winter
Max)
^amily
-(ousing
iity Park — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — —
■amily
-lousing
^ity Park — — — — — — — — — —
-.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)

16.5 0.00

16.5 2.72
o.oo

2.72 )aily, —
lummer
Max)
single —
•amily
-lousing
Jity Park —
rota) —
Daily, —
Winter
Max)
127

0.04 127

58.0 74.5
•0.36 •0.36

57.7 74.1

9.61 12.3

0.00 0.00

0.00 127

0.04 127

1.70 0.04 129
> -0.005 > -0.005 -0.37

1.70 0.04 129

0.26 0.01 21.4
■0.06 -0.06 > -0.005 > -0.005 -0.06

9.55 12.3 0.28 0.01 21.3

12.7 0.00
< 0.005 0.00

12.7 0.00
445

0.14 446
61/85
402
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 -amily
-lousing
::ity Park — — — — — — — — — —
\nnual — — — — — — — — — —
-amily
-lousing
iity Park — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — —
.5.2. Mitigated
'fiteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHQs (lb/day for dally, MT/yr for annual) 127

0.04 127

21.1 0,01

21.1 )aily, —
Summer
Max]
Single —
-amiiy
■lousing
Sity Park —
Total —
)ally, —
Winter
Max)
Single —
^amiiy
-lousing
Sity Park —
Total —
Annual —
127

0.04 127
127

0.04 127

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
127

0.04 127

21.1 0.01

21.1 12.7 0.00 445
PM10E PM10D PMIOT PM2.'IE PM2 5D |PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
127

0.04 127
127
O.04
127
< 0.005 0.00

12.7 0.00

2.11 0.00

12.7 0.00
<0.005 0.00

12.7 0.00

12.7 0.00
< 0.005 0.00

12.7 0.00

0.14 446

73.7 < 0.005 0.00 0.02

2.11 0.00 73.8
445

0.14 446
445

0.14 446
62/85
403
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 -amily
Housing
ilty Park — — — — — — — — — —
-.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) IPMIOE PullOD IPMIOT IPM2.5E PM2 5D IPM2.5T

21.1 0.00 21.1 2.11 0.00 73.7

0.01 0.00 0.01 <0.005 0.00 0.02

21.1 0.00 21.1 2.11 0.00 73.8
Daily, —
summer
Max)
single —
■amily
Housing
;:ity Park —
rota! —
Daily, —
Vinter
Max)
single —
•amily
Housing
Dity Park —
fotaJ —
\nnual —
single —
•amily
Housing
Dily Park —
C02T CH4

3.71 0.00

3.71 3.71

0.00 3.71

0.62 0.00
63/85
404
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 .6.2. Mitigated
Jriteria Pollutants (lb/day for dally, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx
3aily,
summer
Max)
single
■amily
-lousing
ilty Park
rotal
)aily,
iVinter
Max)
single
■amily
Housing
>ity Park
rota!
\nnual
single
=amily
Housing
iity Park
ToUJ
PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 -.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
.7.1. Unmitigated

0.62 3.71

0.00 3.71

3.71 0.00

3.71 0.62

0.00 0.62
64/85
405
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 :riterla Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs {lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.50 PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T
)aily,
Jumtner
Max)
fotal
3aily.
/Vinter
Max)
fotal
\nnuai
fotal
.7.2. Mitigated
Iriteria Pollutants (lb/day for dally, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for dally, MT/yr for annual) ROG NOx PM10E PMIOD PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBCG2 IC02T CH4 3ally,
summer
Max)
fotal
Dally,
Winter
Max)
fotal
\nnual
fotal
65/85
406
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 •.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) I I
Jummer
Max)
fl/inler
Max)
fotal — — — — — — — — — —

8.2. Mitigated
Iriteria Pollutants (lb/day for dally, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for dally, MT/yr for annual) I
Jaily, —
Summer
Max)
rotal —
Jaily, —
A/inter
Max)
rotal —
66/85
407
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 \nnual — — — — — —
Total — — — — — —
•.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
,9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) S02 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 N20 C02e Daily, —
Summer
Max)
rota! —
Daily. —
Wnter
Max)
Total —
\nnual —
Total —
.9.2. Mitigated
TIteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for dally, MT/yr for annual) PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 Daily, —
Summer
Max)
Total —
67/85
408
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Vinter
Max)
-.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated iriteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, h^T/yr for annual) jPMlOE PMIOD PMIOT PM2 fiP PM? hD |PM? nC02 NBC02 C02T CH.) )aily. —
Summer
Max)
fot^ —
5aily, —
Writer
Max)
rot^ —
\nnuaJ —
fotal —
.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants {lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs {lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ROG N0> PMIOE jPMlDD jPMIOT |PM25E |PM25D |PM:5T BC02 NBC02 C02T CH4 Daily. —
Summer
Max)
fotal —
68/85
409
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report. 6/20/202 Jaily, —
Winter
Max)
rota! —
\nnual —
rotal —
.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (ib/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) pecies ROG
3aily. —
summer
Max)
Vvoided —
subtotal —
sequester —
.Hj
subtotal —
Removed —
subtotal —
PM10E PM10D PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BC02 NBC02 C02T
5aily, —
Winter
Max)
\voided —
subtotal —
sequester —
kJ
subtotal —
Removed —
69/85
410
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Subtotal —
\nnual —
\voided —
Subtotal —
Sequester —
;d
Subtotal —
Removed —
Subtotal —
.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants {lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) egelalion ROG
Summer
Max)
Winter
Max)
Total — — — — — — _ __ _
Annual — ~ — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — —
.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Titeria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 70/85
411
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 )aily, —
jummer
Max)
Total —
3aily, —
tVinter
Max)
Total —
Annual —
fotal —
.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Poiiutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily. MT/yr for annual) 5aily, —
summar
Max)
Avoided —
JubtotaJ —
Sequester —
id
Subtotal —
Semoved —
Subtotal —
Sally, —
Winter
Max)
\voided —
Subtotal —
71 /85
412
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Sequester
Ki
Subtotal
Removed
Subtotal
^nr^ual
\voided
Subtotal
Sequester
id
Subtotal
Semoved
Subtotal
). Activity Data
i.l. Construction Schedule
Phase Type Start Date End Dale Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description demolition Demolition 12/2/2024 2/10/2025 5.00 50.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 2/11/2025 3/25/2025 5.00 30,0 — Srading Grading 3/26/2025 7/9/2025 5.00 75,0 —
Suilding Construction Building Construction 7/10/2025 5/11/2028 5.00 740 — 'aving Paving 5/12/2028 7/28/2028 5.00 55.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/29/2028 10/14/2028 5.00 55.0 — 72/85
413
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 i.2. Off-Road Equipment
.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipmeni Type Fuel Ty
)emoiition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel
)emoiition Excavators Diesel
demolition Concrete/lndustriai
Saws
Diesel
>ile Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel
trading Graders Diesel
trading Excavators Diesel
Brading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel
trading Scrapers Diesel
Brading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel
Suiiding Construction Forkiifts Diesel
Suiiding Construction Generator Sets Diesel
Suiiding Construction Cranes Diesel
Suiiding Construction Welders Diesel
Suiiding Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel
'aving Pavers Diesel
'aving Paving Equipment Diesel
'aving Rollers Diesel
Xrchitectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tiers
Tier S
Number per Day
S.OO

3.00 1.00

3.00 4.00

1.00 S.OO

8.00 S.OO

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00
S.OO

8.00 S.OO

1.00 Hour.s Per Day

8.00 8.00

8.00 8.00

8.00 8.00

8.00 8.00

8.00 8.00

8.00 8.00

7.00 8.00

7.00 8.00

8.00 8.00

6.00 Horsepower
367

36.0 33.0
367

84.0 148

36.0 84.0
4S3
367
8S.0

14.0 367

46.0 84.0

81.0 69.0

36.0 37.0

0.40 0.38

0.73 0.40

0.37 0.41

0.38 0.37

0.48 0.40
O.SO

0.74 0.S9

0.45 0.37

0.4S

0.36 0.38

0.48 73/85
414
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 .2.2. Mitigated
demolition
demolition
demolition
Site Preparation
Site Preparation
Equipmunl Typu Fuel TyptRubber Tired Dozers Diesel
Excavators Diesel
Concrete/Industrial Diesel
Saws
Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel
Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel
Engine Tier
Tier 2
Tier 2
Tier 2
Tier 2
Tier 2
Number per Day

2.00 3.00

1.00 3.00

4.00 Hours Per D.ly

8.00 8.00

8.00 8.00

8.00 Horsepower
367

36.0 33.0
367

84.0 0,40

0.38 0.73

0.40 0.37
oes
Srading Graders Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Srading Excavators Diesel Tier 2 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Srading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 2 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
trading Scrapers Diesel Tier 2 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Srading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Building Construction Forkiifts Diesel Tier 2 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 2 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/BacKh
oes
Diesel Tier 2 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
'aving Pavers Diesel Tier 2 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
'aving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 2 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 'aving Rollers Diesel Tier 2 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Xrchitectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 2 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 '.3. Construction Vehicles
74/85
415
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
.3.1. Unmitigated
De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Ont' VVay Trips per Day Miles per Trrp
Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 15,0 7.70 LDA.LDT1.LDT2
Demolition Vendor —4.00 HHDT.MHDT
Demolition Mauling 1.50 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Cnsite truck — —
HHDT
site Preparation — - — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 7.70 LDA.LDT1.LDT2
>ite Preparation Vendor —

4.00 HHDT.MHDT
Dite Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
lite Preparation Onsite truck — —
HHDT
Brading ~ — — -
Brading Worker 20.0 7.70 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Brading Vendor -

4.00 HHDT.MHDT
Brading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Brading Onsite truck — —
HHDT
Buiiding Construction - — — —
Building Construction Worker 95.8 7.70 LDA,1.DT1 ,L0T2
Building Construction Vendor 28.4 4.00 HHDT.MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — —
HHDT
'aving - — — —
'aving Worker 15.0 7.70 LDA.LDT1,LDT2
'aving Vendor —

4.00 HHDT.MHDT
'aving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
'aving Onsite truck — —
HHDT
75/85
416
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
.3.2. Mitigated
Demolition
Demolition
Demolition
Demolition
Demolition
Jite Preparation
>ite Preparation
}ite Preparation
>ite Preparation
Site Preparation
Brading
Brading
Brading
Brading
Brading
Building Construction
Building Construction
Building Construction
Building Construction
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Onsite truck
Trip Typo
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Onsite truck
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Onsite truck
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Onsite truck
Worker
Vendor
Hauling

19.2 0.00

7.70 4.00

20.0 Qne-Way Trips per Day

15.0 1.50

17.5 0.00

20.0 0.00

95.8 28.4

0.00 Miics per Trip

7.70 4.00

20.0 7.70

4.00 20.0

7.70 4.00

20.0 7.70

4.00 20.0
LDA,LDT1,LDT2
HHDT.MHDT
HHDT
HHDT
LDA,LDT1.LDT2
HHDT.MHDT
HHDT
HHDT
LDA,LDT1 ,LDT2
HHDT.MHDT
HHDT
HHDT
LDA,LDT1 ,LDT2
HHDT.MHDT
HHDT
HHDT
LDA.LDT1 ,LDT2
HHDT.MHDT
HHDT
76/85
417
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 Building Construction Onsite truck — —
HHDT
'aving — — - -
^aving Worker 15.0 7.70 LDA,LDT1 ,LDT2
^ving Vendor —

4.00 HHDT.MHDT
'aving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
'aving Onsite truck - —
HHDT
Uchitectural Coating — — — —
^chitectural Coating Worker 19.2 7.70 LDA.LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor —

4.00 HHDT.MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — —
HHDT

1.4. Vehicles
.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
bontrol Strategies Applied PM10 Reduction 1PfVlf? 5 Reduction /Vater unpaved roads twice daily 55% 55%
.imit vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 25 mph 44% 44% Sweep paved roads once per month 9% 9%

1.5. Architectural Coatings
'hase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non ResidfciHiai Inioiioi Area
Coaled |sq ft)
Non-Residential Extenor Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated ^sq Itj
Architectural Coating 1,050,368 350,123 0.00 0.00 —

1.6. Dust Mitigation
77/85
418
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 .6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Material Imported (cy)

0.00 0.00
demolition
Site Preparation
grading
'aving
Material Exported toy)

0.00 0.00
.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
;ontroi Strategies Applied
A/ater Exposed Area
A/ater Demolished Area
i.7. Construction Paving
single Family Housing
dity Park
Frequency (per day)
Area Paved (acres)

2.93 0.00
Acres Graded (acres)

0.00 45.0
225

0.00 PM10 Reduction
61%
36%

1.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors Wh per Year and Emission Factor (Ib/MWh)
J024
1025
1026
1027
1028
kWh per Year

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 204
204
204
204
204

0.03 0.03

0.03 0.03

0.03 Matciial Demolished (Building
St|uaie Footage)
6,500

0.00 0.00

0.00 Acres Paved racres)
0%
0%

2.93 PM2.5 Reduction
61%
36%
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
<0.005
78/85
419
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202

1.9. Operational Mobile Sources
.9.1. Unmitigated
Trips Wnekday Trips Saturday
single Family
Tousing
2,506
)ity Park 0.66
.9.2. Mitigated
slrtgle Family
-lousing
Trips. Weekday
2,508

0.66 2,508

1.65 Trips Saturday
Dity Park
i.10. Operational Area Sources
.10.1. Hearths
.10.1.1. Unmitigated
earth Type
jingle Family Housing
Nood Fireplaces
3as Fireplaces
'ropane Fireplaces
Electric Fireplaces
<10 Fireplaces
Conventional Wood Stoves
Catalytic Wood Stoves
2,508

1.65 Trips Sunday
2,508

1.84 Trips Sunday
2,508

1.84 Trips Year
915,559
353
Tnps.Yoar
915,559
353
VMT Weekday VMT Saturday
16,810

4.42 16,810

4.42 Unmitigated inumberi
0 0
0 133
133
0 0
79/85
16,810

11.1 VMT Weekday VMT Saturday
16,810

11.1 VMT Sunday

16.810

12.4 VMT.'Sunday
18,810

12.4 6,135.600
2,380
6,135,600
2,380
420
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Reach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 <lon-Catalytic Wood Stoves
'ellet Wood Stoves
.10.1.2. Mitigated
earth Type
single Family Housing
Vood Fireplaces
jas Fireplaces
^ropane Fireplaces
ilectric Rreplaces
<Jo Rreplaces
Conventional Wood Stoves
Catalytic Wood Stoves
-Jon-CatalyUc Wood Stoves
'ellet Wood Stoves
Unmitigated (number)
0 0
0 133
133
0 0
0 0
.10.2. Architectural Coatings
esidentiai Interior Area Coated (sq it) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coaled (sq (1)
1050367.5 350,123 0.00
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coaled
(sq ft)

0.00 Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
.10.3. Landscape Equipment
>now Days
Cummer Days
day/yr
day/yr

0.00 180
80/85
421
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.

De Young Properties Peach & Behymer Project Custom Report, 6/20/202 .10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
snow Days
summer Days
day/yr
day/yr
i.11. Operational Energy Consumption
.11.1. Unmitigated
ilectricity (kWh/yr) and 002 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) single Family Housing
^rty Park
Electricity (kWh yr)
2,486,191

0.00 204
204

0.0330

0.0330
.11.2. Mitigated
•lectricity (kWh/yr) and CQ2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) single Family Housing
^ity Park
Clcc'.r'CJty (r.Wti y
2,482,041

0.00 204
204

0.0330

0.0330
i.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
.12.1. Unmitigated
single Family Housing
iity Park
Indoor Water (gal/year)
10,718,736

0.00 0.00
160

0.0040

0.0040

0.0040

0.0040
Natur.il Gas ikBTU yri

0.00 0.00
Naiuial Gas ikBTU yn

0.00 0.00
Outdoor Water (gal/year)
52,272,945
1,116,187
81 /es
422
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
1451 259382.8 4084275 9.76E-04 1.49E-04 8.04E-05
1452 259392.6 4084297 9.66E-04 1.47E-04 7.96E-05
1453 259402.4 4084319 9.53E-04 1.45E-04 7.86E-05
1454 259412.3 4084341 9.39E-04 1.43E-04 7.74E-05
1455 259422.1 4084362 9.22E-04 1.41E-04 7.60E-05
1456 259431.9 4084384 9.05E-04 1.38E-04 7.46E-05
1457 259441.8 4084406 8.90E-04 1.36E-04 7.34E-05
1458 259451.6 4084428 8.72E-04 1.33E-04 7.18E-05
1459 259461.4 4084449 8.53E-04 1.30E-04 7.03E-05
1460 259471.3 4084471 8.34E-04 1.27E-04 6.87E-05
1461 259481.1 4084493 8.14E-04 1.24E-04 6.71E-05
1462 259490.9 4084515 7.95E-04 1.21E-04 6.55E-05
1463 259500.8 4084536 7.74E-04 1.18E-04 6.38E-05
1464 259510.6 4084558 7.53E-04 1.15E-04 6.21E-05
1465 259520.4 4084580 7.31E-04 l.llE-04 6.02E-05
1466 259530.3 4084602 7.07E-04 1.08E-04 5.83E-05
1467 259540.1 4084623 6.82E-04 1.04E-04 5.62E-05
1468 259549.9 4084645 6.57E-04 l.OOE-04 5.41E-05
1469 259559.8 4084667 6.32E-04 9.62E-05 5.21E-05
1470 259569.6 4084688 6.07E-04 9.25E-05 5.01E-05
1471 259579.5 4084710 5.84E-04 8.90E-05 4.82E-05
1472 259589.3 4084732 5.63E-04 8.58E-05 4.64E-05
1473 259599.1 4084754 5.44E-04 8.29E-05 4.49E-05
1474 259609 4084775 5.26E-04 8.02E-05 4.34E-05
1475 259618.8 4084797 5.10E-04 7.77E-05 4.20E-05
1476 259628.6 4084819 4.94E-04 7.52E-05 4.07E-05
1477 259638.5 4084841 4.78E-04 7.28E-05 3.94E-05
1478 259648.3 4084862 4.62E-04 7.03E-05 3.80E-05
1479 258305.3 4083623 1.82E-04 2.78E-05 1.50E-05
1480 258281 4083624 1.78E-04 2.71E-05 1.47E-05
1481 258256.6 4083625 1.74E-04 2.65E-05 1.43E-05
1482 258232.3 4083626 1.70E-04 2.59E-05 1.40E-05
1483 258208 4083627 1.66E-04 2.53E-05 1.37E-05
1484 258183.6 4083628 1.62E-04 2.47E-05 1.34E-05
1485 258159.3 4083629 1.58E-04 2.41E-05 1.30E-05
1486 258135 4083630 1.54E-04 2.35E-05 1.27E-05
1487 258110.6 4083631 1.51E-04 2.29E-05 1.24E-05
1488 258086.3 4083632 1.47E-04 2.24E-05 1.21E-05
1489 258062 4083633 1.43E-04 2.18E-05 1.18E-05
1490 258037.6 4083634 1.40E-04 2.13E-05 1.15E-05
1491 258013.3 4083635 1.36E-04 2.07E-05 1.12E-05
1492 257989 4083636 1.33E-04 2.02E-05 l.lOE-05
1493 257964.6 4083637 1.30E-04 1.98E-05 1.07E-05
1494 257940.3 4083638 1.27E-04 1.93E-05 1.04E-05
1495 257916 4083639 1.24E-04 1.89E-05 1.02E-05
1496 257891.6 4083640 1.21E-04 1.84E-05 9.97E-06
1497 257867.3 4083641 1.18E-04 1.80E-05 9.76E-06
423
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
1404 258484.3 4083689 2.54E-04 3.87E-05 2.09E-05
1405 258506.7 4083698 2.66E-04 4.05E-05 2.19E-05
1406 258529 4083706 2.79E-04 4.25E-05 2.30E-05
1407 258551.4 4083714 2.93E-04 4.47E-05 2.42E-05
1408 258573.8 4083723 3.08E-04 4.69E-05 2.54E-05
1409 258596.2 4083731 3.24E-04 4.93E-05 2.67E-05
1410 258618.5 4083739 3.40E-04 5.18E-05 2.80E-05
1411 258640.9 4083747 3.57E-04 5.45E-05 2.95E-05
1412 258663.3 4083756 3.75E-04 5.72E-05 3.09E-05
1413 258685.7 4083764 3.94E-04 6.00E-05 3.25E-05
1414 258708 4083772 4.14E-04 6.30E-05 3.41E-05
1415 258730.4 4083781 4.34E-04 6.61E-05 3.57E-05
1416 258752.8 4083789 4.54E-04 6.92E-05 3.75E-05
1417 258775.2 4083797 4.75E-04 7.24E-05 3.92E-05
1418 258797.6 4083805 4.97E-04 7.57E-05 4.10E-05
1419 258819.9 4083814 5.19E-04 7.91E-05 4.28E-05
1420 258842.3 4083822 5.41E-04 8.25E-05 4.46E-05
1421 258864.7 4083830 5.64E-04 8.59E-05 4.65E-05
1422 258887.1 4083839 5.86E-04 8.93E-05 4.83E-05
1423 258909.4 4083847 6.09E-04 9.27E-05 5.02E-05
1424 258931.8 4083855 6.31E-04 9.61E-05 5.20E-05
1425 258954.2 4083863 6.53E-04 9.95E-05 5.38E-05
1426 258976.6 4083872 6.75E-04 1.03E-04 5.56E-05
1427 258998.9 4083880 6.96E-04 1.06E-04 5.74E-05
1428 259021.3 4083888 7.16E-04 1.09E-04 5.91E-05
1429 259043.7 4083897 7.36E-04 1.12E-04 6.07E-05
1430 259066.1 4083905 7.54E-04 1.15E-04 6.22E-05
1431 259088.4 4083913 7.72E-04 1.18E-04 6.36E-05
1432 259110.8 4083921 7.87E-04 1.20E-04 6.49E-05
1433 259133.2 4083930 8.02E-04 1.22E-04 6.61E-05
1434 259155.6 4083938 8.15E-04 1.24E-04 6.72E-05
1435 259177.9 4083946 8.25E-04 1.26E-04 6.80E-05
1436 259200.3 4083955 8.35E-04 1.27E-04 6.88E-05
1437 259222.7 4083963 8.43E-04 1.28E-04 6.95E-05
1438 259254.9 4083993 8.71E-04 1.33E-04 7.18E-05
1439 259264.7 4084015 8.93E-04 1.36E-04 7.36E-05
1440 259274.6 4084036 9.13E-04 1.39E-04 7.52E-05
1441 259284.4 4084058 9.31E-04 1.42E-04 7.67E-05
1442 259294.2 4084080 9.47E-04 1.44E-04 7.81E-05
1443 259304.1 4084102 9.61E-04 1.46E-04 7.92E-05
1444 259313.9 4084123 9.72E-04 1.48E-04 8.02E-05
1445 259323.7 4084145 9.81E-04 1.49E-04 8.09E-05
1446 259333.6 4084167 9.87E-04 1.50E-04 8.14E-05
1447 259343.4 4084188 9.91E-04 1.51E-04 8.17E-05
1448 259353.3 4084210 9.91E-04 1.51E-04 8.17E-05
1449 259363.1 4084232 9.89E-04 1.51E-04 8.15E-05
1450 259372.9 4084254 9.84E-04 1.50E-04 8.11E-05
424
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
1357 259398.3 4084758 7.31E-04 l.llE-04 6.03E-05
1358 259408.3 4084780 7.00E-04 1.07E-04 5.77E-05
1359 259418.3 4084802 6.72E-04 1.02E-04 5.54E-05
1360 259428.3 4084824 6.45E-04 9.82E-05 5.32E-05
1361 259438.2 4084846 6.19E-04 9,43E-05 5.10E-05
1362 259448.2 4084868 5.94E-04 9.05E-05 4.90E-05
1363 258313.5 4083823 2.66E-04 4.06E-05 2.20E-05
1364 258289.2 4083824 2.59E-04 3.94E-05 . 2.13E-05
1365 258264.8 4083825 2.51E-04 3.82E-05 2.07E-05
1366 258240.5 4083826 2.44E-04 3.71E-05 2.01E-05
1367 258216.2 4083827 2.37E-04 3.61E-05 1.95E-05
1368 258191.8 4083828 2.30E-04 3.50E-05 1.89E-05
1369 258167.5 4083829 2.23E-04 3.39E-05 1.84E-05
1370 258143.2 4083830 2.16E-04 3.29E-05 1.78E-05
1371 258118,8 4083831 2.09E-04 3.19E-05 1.72E-05
1372 258094.5 4083832 2.03E-04 3.09E-05 1.67E-05
1373 258070.2 4083833 1.96E-04 2.99E-05 1.62E-05
1374 258045.9 4083834 1.90E-04 2.90E-05 1.57E-05
1375 258021.5 4083835 1.84E-04 2.81E-05 1.52E-05
1376 257997.2 4083836 1.79E-04 2.72E-05 1.47E-05
1377 257972.9 4083837 1.73E-04 2.64E-05 1.43E-05
1378 257948.5 4083838 1.68E-04 2.56E-05 1.39E-05
1379 257924.2 4083839 1.63E-04 2.49E-05 1.35E-05
1380 257899.9 4083840 1.59E-04 2.42E-05 1.31E-05
1381 257875.5 4083841 1.55E-04 2.36E-05 1.28E-05
1382 257851.2 4083842 1.51E-04 2.30E-05 1.25E-05
1383 257826.9 4083843 1.48E-04 2.25E-05 1.22E-05
1384 257802.5 4083844 1.45E-04 2.21E-05 1.19E-05
1385 257778.2 4083845 1.42E-04 2.16E-05 1.17E-05
1386 257753.9 4083846 1.39E-04 2.12E-05 1.15E-05
1387 257729.5 4083847 1.37E-04 2.09E-05 1.13E-05
1388 257705.2 4083848 1.35E-04 2.05E-05 l.llE-05
1389 257680.9 4083849 1.33E-04 2.02E-05 l.lOE-05
1390 257656.5 4083850 1.31E-04 2.00E-05 1.08E-05
1391 257632.2 4083851 1.29E-04 1.97E-05 1.07E-05
1392 257607.9 4083852 1.28E-04 1.94E-05 1.05E-05
1393 257583.5 4083853 1.26E-04 1.92E-05 1.04E-05
1394 257559.2 4083854 1.24E-04 1.89E-05 1.02E-05
1395 257534.9 4083855 1.23E-04 1.87E-05 l.OlE-05
1396 257510.6 4083856 1.21E-04 1.84E-05 9.97E-06
1397 258327.7 4083631 1.89E-04 2.89E-05 1.56E-05
1398 258350 4083640 1.97E-04 3.00E-05 1.62E-05
1399 258372.4 4083648 2.05E-04 3.12E-05 1.69E-05
1400 258394.8 4083656 2.13E-04 3.25E-05 1.76E-05
1401 258417.2 4083665 2.22E-04 3.39E-05 1.83E-05
1402 258439.5 4083673 2.32E-04 3.54E-05 1.91E-05
1403 258461.9 4083681 2.43E-04 3.70E-05 2.00E-05
425
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
1310 258677 4083958 6.31E-04 9.61E-05 5.20E-05
1311 258699.7 4083966 6.62E-04 l.OlE-04 5.46E-05
1312 258722,5 4083974 6.94E-04 1.06E-04 5.72E-05
1313 258745.2 4083983 7.26E-04 l.llE-04 5.99E-05
1314 258767.9 4083991 7.58E-04 1.16E-04 6.25E-05
1315 258790.6 4084000 7.90E-04 1.20E-04 6.51E-05
1316 258813.3 4084008 8.22E-04 1.25E-04 6.77E-05
1317 258836.1 4084016 8.53E-04 1.30E-04 7.03E-05
1318 258858.8 4084025 8.83E-04 1.34E-04 7.28E-05
1319 258881.5 4084033 9.12E-04 1.39E-04 7.52E-05
1320 258904.2 4084042 9.40E-04 1.43E-04 7.75E-05
1321 258926.9 4084050 9.66E-04 1.47E-04 7.96E-05
1322 258949.7 4084059 9.88E-04 1.51E-04 8.15E-05
1323 258972.4 4084067 l.OlE-03 1.54E-04 8.33E-05
1324 258995.1 4084075 1.03E-03 1.57E-04 8.49E-05
1325 259017.8 4084084 1.05E-03 1.60E-04 8.64E-05
1326 259040.5 4084092 1.06E-03 1.62E-04 8.77E-05
1327 259063.3 4084101 1.08E-03 1.64E-04 8.87E-05
1328 259086 4084109 1.09E-03 1.65E-04 8.95E-05
1329 259118.7 4084139 1.12E-03 1.71E-04 9.26E-05
1330 259128.7 4084162 1.15E-03 1.76E-04 9.51E-05
1331 259138.7 4084184 1.18E-03 1.80E-04 9.72E-05
1332 259148.6 4084206 1.20E-03 1.83E-04 9.91E-05
1333 259158.6 4084228 1.22E-03 1.86E-04 l.OlE-04
1334 259168.6 4084250 1.24E-03 1.88E-04 1.02E-04
1335 259178.6 4084272 1.25E-03 1.90E-04 1.03E-04
1336 259188.6 4084294 1.25E-03 1.91E-04 1.03E-04
1337 259198.6 4084316 1.26E-03 1.91E-04 1.03E-04
1338 259208.6 4084338 1.25E-03 1.91E-04 1.03E-04
1339 259218.5 4084360 1.25E-03 1.90E-04 1.03E-04
1340 259228.5 4084382 1.23E-03 1.88E-04 1.02E-04
1341 259238.5 4084404 1.22E-03 1.86E-04 l.OOE-04
1342 259248.5 4084426 1.20E-03 1.83E-04 9.92E-05
1343 259258.5 4084449 1.18E-03 1.80E-04 9.74E-05
1344 259268.5 4084471 1.16E-03 1.76E-04 9.54E-05
1345 259278.5 4084493 1.13E-03 1.72E-04 9.32E-05
1346 259288.5 4084515 l.lOE-03 1.68E-04 9.09E-05
1347 259298.4 4084537 1.07E-03 1.63E-04 8.84E-05
1348 259308.4 4084559 1.04E-03 1.59E-04 8.59E-05
1349 259318.4 4084581 l.OlE-03 1.54E-04 8.33E-05
1350 259328.4 4084603 9.78E-04 1.49E-04 8.06E-05
1351 259338.4 4084625 9.43E-04 1.44E-04 7.78E-05
1352 259348.4 4084647 9.08E-04 1.38E-04 7.49E-05
1353 259358.4 4084669 8.72E-04 1.33E-04 7.19E-05
1354 259368.3 4084691 8.35E-04 1.27E-04 6.88E-05
1355 259378.3 4084713 7.99E-04 1.22E-04 6.59E-05
1356 259388.3 4084735 7.64E-04 1.16E-04 6.30E-05
426
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
1263 258273.1 4084025 4.09E-04 6.23E-05 3.37E-05
1264 258248.7 4084026 3.94E-04 6.00E-05 3.24E-05
1265 258224.4 4084027 3.79E-04 5.77E-05 3.12E-05
1266 258200.1 4084028 3.64E-04 5.55E-05 3.00E-05
1267 258175.7 4084029 3.50E-04 5.33E-05 2.89E-05
1268 258151.4 4084030 3.37E-04 5.13E-05 2.77E-05
1269 258127.1 4084031 3.23E-04 4.93E-05 2.67E-05
1270 258102.7 4084032 3.11E-04 4.74E-05 2.56E-05
1271 258078.4 4084033 2.99E-04 4.55E-05 2.46E-05
1272 258054.1 4084034 2.87E-04 4.37E-05 2.37E-05
1273 258029.7 4084035 2.76E-04 4.20E-05 2.27E-05
1274 258005.4 4084036 2.65E-04 4.04E-05 2.19E-05
1275 257981.1 4084037 2.56E-04 3.89E-05 2.11E-05
1276 257956.7 4084038 2.46E-04 3.75E-05 2.03E-05
1277 257932.4 4084039 2.38E-04 3.62E-05 1.96E-05
1278 257908.1 4084040 2.30E-04 3.50E-05 1.89E-05
1279 257883.7 4084041 2.23E-04 3.39E-05 1.83E-05
1280 257859.4 4084042 2.16E-04 3.29E-05 1.78E-05
1281 257835.1 4084043 2.10E-04 3.20E-05 1.73E-05
1282 257810.7 4084044 2.04E-04 3.11E-05 1.68E-05
1283 257786.4 4084045 1.99E-04 3.03E-05 1.64E-05
1284 257762.1 4084046 1.95E-04 2.96E-05 1.60E-05
1285 257737.8 4084047 1.90E-04 2.90E-05 1.57E-05
1286 257713.4 4084048 1.86E-04 2.84E-05 1.54E-05
1287 257689.1 4084049 1.83E-04 2.79E-05 1.51E-05
1288 257664.8 4084050 1.79E-04 2.73E-05 1.48E-05
1289 257640.4 4084051 1.76E-04 2.68E-05 1.45E-05
1290 257616.1 4084052 1.72E-04 2.63E-05 1.42E-05
1291 257591.8 4084053 1.69E-04 2.58E-05 1.39E-05
1292 257567.4 4084054 1.66E-04 2.52E-05 1.36E-05
1293 257543.1 4084055 1.62E-04 2.47E-05 1.34E-05
1294 257518.8 4084056 1.58E-04 2.41E-05 1.31E-05
1295 258336.2 4083831 2.80E-04 4.26E-05 2.30E-05
1296 258358.9 4083840 2.94E-04 4.48E-05 2.42E-05
1297 258381.7 4083848 3.10E-04 4.72E-05 2.55E-05
1298 258404.4 4083857 3.27E-04 4.98E-05 2.69E-05
1299 258427.1 4083865 3.45E-04 5.26E-05 2.85E-05
1300 258449.8 4083873 3.65E-04 5.56E-05 3.01E-05
1301 258472.5 4083882 3.86E-04 5.89E-05 3.19E-05
1302 258495.3 4083890 4.09E-04 6.23E-05 3.37E-05
1303 258518 4083899 4.33E-04 6.59E-05 3.57E-05
1304 258540.7 4083907 4.58E-04 6.98E-05 3.77E-05
1305 258563.4 4083916 4.84E-04 7.38E-05 3.99E-05
1306 258586.1 4083924 5.12E-04 7.80E-05 4.22E-05
1307 258608.9 4083932 5.40E-04 8.23E-05 4.45E-05
1308 258631.6 4083941 5.70E-04 8.68E-05 4.70E-05
1309 258654.3 4083949 6.00E-04 9.14E-05 4.94E-05
427
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
1216 258590.9 4084123 9.08E-04 1.38E-04 7.49E-05
1217 258613.4 4084131 9.55E-04 1.45E-04 7.87E-05
1218 258635.8 4084139 l.OOE-03 1.53E-04 8.26E-05
1219 258658.2 4084147 1.05E-03 1.60E-04 8.64E-05
1220 258680.7 4084156 1.09E-03 1.67E-04 9.02E-05
1221 258703.1 4084164 1.14E-03 1.74E-04 9.40E-05
1222 258725.5 4084172 1.18E-03 1.80E-04 9.76E-05
1223 258748 4084181 1.23E-03 1.87E-04 l.OlE-04
1224 258770.4 4084189 1.27E-03 1.93E-04 1.04E-04
1225 258792.9 4084197 1.31E-03 1.99E-04 1.08E-04
1226 258815.3 4084206 1.34E-03 2.04E-04 l.llE-04
1227 258837.7 4084214 1.37E-03 2.09E-04 1.13E-04
1228 258860.2 4084222 1.40E-03 2.14E-04 1.16E-04
1229 258882.6 4084230 1.43E-03 2.17E-04 1.18E-04
1230 258905 4084239 1.45E-03 2.21E-04 1.19E-04
1231 258927.5 4084247 1.46E-03 2.23E-04 1.21E-04
1232 258949.9 4084255 1.47E-03 2.24E-04 1.21E-04
1233 258982.2 4084286 1.52E-03 2.32E-04 1.26E-04
1234 258992.1 4084307 1.56E-03 2.38E-04 1.29E-04
1235 259001.9 4084329 1.60E-03 2.43E-04 1.32E-04
1236 259011.8 4084351 1.63E-03 2.48E-04 1.34E-04
1237 259021.6 4084373 1.65E-03 2.51E-04 1.36E-04
1238 259031.5 4084394 1.66E-03 2.53E-04 1.37E-04
1239 259041.4 4084416 1.67E-03 2.54E-04 1.38E-04
1240 259051.2 4084438 1.67E-03 2.54E-04 1.38E-04
1241 259061.1 4084460 1.66E-03 2.53E-04 1.37E-04
1242 259070.9 4084482 1.65E-03 2.51E-04 1.36E-04
1243 259080.8 4084503 1.63E-03 2.48E-04 1.34E-04
1244 259090.7 4084525 1.60E-03 2.43E-04 1.32E-04
1245 259100.5 4084547 1.56E-03 2.38E-04 1.29E-04
1246 259110.4 4084569 1.52E-03 2.32E-04 1.26E-04
1247 259120.2 4084591 1.48E-03 2.26E-04 1.22E-04
1248 259130.1 4084612 1.43E-03 2.18E-04 1.18E-04
1249 259140 4084634 1.38E-03 2.11E-04 1.14E-04
1250 259149.8 4084656 1.33E-03 2.03E-04 l.lOE-04
1251 259159.7 4084678 1.28E-03 1.95E-04 1.05E-04
1252 259169.6 4084700 1.22E-03 1.87E-04 l.OlE-04
1253 259179.4 4084721 1.17E-03 1.78E-04 9.62E-05
1254 259189.3 4084743 l.llE-03 1.69E-04 9.16E-05
1255 259199.1 4084765 1.06E-03 1.61E-04 8.71E-05
1256 259209 4084787 l.OOE-03 1.53E-04 8.25E-05
1257 259218.9 4084809 9.51E-04 1.45E-04 7.84E-05
1258 259228.7 4084830 9.03E-04 1.38E-04 7.44E-05
1259 259238.6 4084852 8.59E-04 1.31E-04 7.08E-05
1260 259248.4 4084874 8.16E-04 1.24E-04 6.73E-05
1261 258321.7 4084023 4.42E-04 6.73E-05 3.64E-05
1262 258297.4 4084024 4.25E-04 6.48E-05 3.50E-05
428
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
1169 259039 4084859 1.33E-03 2.03E-04 l.lOE-04
1170 259048.7 4084880 1.25E-03 1.90E-04 1.03E-04
1171 258329.9 4084223 8.60E-04 1.31E-04 7.09E-05
1172 258305.6 4084224 8.25E-04 1.26E-04 6.80E-05
1173 258281.3 4084225 7.91E-04 1.20E-04 6.52E-05
1174 258256.9 4084226 7.57E-04 1.15E-04 6.24E-05
1175 258232.6 4084227 7.23E-04 l.lOE-04 5.96E-05
1176 258208.3 4084228 6.90E-04 1.05E-04 5.68E-05
1177 258183.9 4084229 6.57E-04 l.OOE-04 5.41E-05
1178 258159.6 4084230 6.25E-04 9.52E-05 5.15E-05
1179 258135.3 4084231 5.94E-04 9.05E-05 4.90E-05
1180 258110.9 4084232 5.65E-04 8.60E-05 4.65E-05
1181 258086.6 4084233 5.37E-04 8.18E-05 4.42E-05
1182 258062.3 4084234 5.10E-04 7.77E-05 4.21E-05
1183 258037.9 4084235 4.85E-04 7.39E-05 4.00E-05
1184 258013.6 4084236 4.62E-04 7.04E-05 3.81E-05
1185 257989.3 4084237 4.40E-04 6.70E-05 3.63E-05
1186 257965 4084238 4.20E-04 6.40E-05 3.46E-05
1187 257940.6 4084239 4.01E-04 6.11E-05 3.30E-05
1188 257916.3 4084240 3.83E-04 5.84E-05 3.16E-05
1189 257892 4084241 3.67E-04 5.59E-05 3.02E-05
1190 257867.6 4084242 3.52E-04 5.36E-05 2.90E-05
1191 257843.3 4084243 3.38E-04 5.15E-05 2.78E-05
1192 257819 4084244 3.25E-04 4.95E-05 2.68E-05
1193 257794.6 4084245 3.13E-04 4.77E-05 2.58E-05
1194 257770.3 4084246 3.02E-04 4.60E-05 2.49E-05
1195 257746 4084247 2.92E-04 4.44E-05 2.40E-05
1196 257721.6 4084248 2.82E-04 4.29E-05 2.32E-05
1197 257697.3 4084249 2.73E-04 4.15E-05 2.25E-05
1198 257673 4084250 2.64E-04 4.03E-05 2.18E-05
1199 257648.6 4084251 2.56E-04 3.90E-05 2.11E-05
1200 257624.3 4084252 2.49E-04 3.79E-05 2.05E-05
1201 257600 4084253 2.41E-04 3.68E-05 1.99E-05
1202 257575.6 4084254 2.34E-04 3.57E-05 1.93E-05
1203 257551.3 4084255 2.28E-04 3.47E-05 1.88E-05
1204 257527 4084256 2.22E-04 3.38E-05 1.83E-05
1205 258344.2 4084031 4.70E-04 7.17E-05 3.88E-05
1206 258366.6 4084039 5.01E-04 7.63E-05 4.13E-05
1207 258389 4084048 5.34E-04 8.13E-05 4.40E-05
1208 258411.5 4084056 5.69E-04 8.66E-05 4.69E-05
1209 258433.9 4084064 6.05E-04 9.22E-05 4.99E-05
1210 258456.3 4084073 6.44E-04 9.82E-05 5.31E-05
1211 258478.8 4084081 6.85E-04 1.04E-04 5.65E-05
1212 258501.2 4084089 7.27E-04 l.llE-04 5.99E-05
1213 258523.6 4084098 7.71E-04 1.17E-04 6.35E-05
1214 258546.1 4084106 8.16E-04 1.24E-04 6.72E-05
1215 258568.5 4084114 8.62E-04 1.31E-04 7.10E-05
429
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
1122 257628.4 4084352 3.13E-04 4.77E-05 2.58E-05
1123 257604.1 4084353 3.03E-04 4.62E-05 2.50E-05
1124 257579.8 4084354 2.94E-04 4.47E-05 2.42E-05
1125 257555.4 4084355 2.85E-04 4.34E-05 2.35E-05
1126 257531.1 4084356 2.77E-04 4.21E-05 2.28E-05
1127 258351.9 4084231 9.21E-04 1.40E-04 7.59E-05
1128 258373.9 4084239 9.85E-04 1.50E-04 8.12E-05
1129 258395.9 4084247 1.05E-03 1.60E-04 8.66E-05
1130 258417.9 4084255 1.12E-03 1.71E-04 9.23E-05
1131 258439.9 4084263 1.19E-03 1.81E-04 9.81E-05
1132 258461.9 4084272 1.26E-03 1.92E-04 1.04E-04
1133 258483.9 4084280 1.33E-03 2.03E-04 l.lOE-04
1134 258505.9 4084288 1.41E-03 2.14E-04 1.16E-04
1135 258527.9 4084296 1.48E-03 2.25E-04 1.22E-04
1136 258549.9 4084304 1.55E-03 2.36E-04 1.28E-04
1137 258571.9 4084312 1.62E-03 2.47E-04 1.34E-04
1138 258594 4084320 1.69E-03 2.58E-04 1.39E-04
1139 258616 4084329 1.76E-03 2.68E-04 1.45E-04
1140 258638 4084337 1.82E-03 2.77E-04 1.50E-04
1141 258660 4084345 1.88E-03 2.87E-04 1.55E-04
1142 258682 4084353 1.94E-03 2.95E-04 1.60E-04
1143 258704 4084361 1.99E-03 3.03E-04 1.64E-04
1144 258726 4084369 2.03E-03 3.09E-04 l,67E-04
1145 258748 4084377 2.07E-03 3.15E-04 1.70E-04
1146 258770 4084386 2.10E-03 3.19E-04 1.73E-04
1147 258792 4084394 2.12E-03 3.22E-04 1.74E-04
1148 258814 4084402 2.12E-03 3.23E-04 1.75E-04
1149 258845.6 4084431 2.19E-03 3.34E-04 1.81E-04
1150 258855.3 4084453 2.25E-03 3.43E-04 1.85E-04
1151 258865 4084474 2.30E-03 3.50E-04 1.90E-04
1152 258874.6 4084496 2.34E-03 3.56E-04 1.93E-04
1153 258884.3 4084517 2.36E-03 3.60E-04 1.95E-04
1154 258894 4084538 2.37E-03 3.61E-04 1.95E-04
1155 258903.7 4084560 2.37E-03 3.61E-04 1.95E-04
1156 258913.3 4084581 2.35E-03 3.58E-04 1.94E-04
1157 258923 4084602 2.32E-03 3.53E-04 1.91E-04
1158 258932.7 4084624 2.27E-03 3.46E-04 1.87E-04
1159 258942.3 4084645 2.22E-03 3.38E-04 1.83E-04
1160 258952 4084667 2.15E-03 3.27E-04 1.77E-04
1161 258961.7 4084688 2.07E-03 3.15E-04 1.70E-04
1162 258971.4 4084709 1.98E-03 3.02E-04 1.63E-04
1163 258981 4084731 1.89E-03 2.88E-04 1.56E-04
1164 258990.7 4084752 1.79E-03 2.73E-04 1.48E-04
1165 259000.4 4084773 1.70E-03 2.58E-04 1.40E-04
1166 259010 4084795 1.60E-03 2.44E-04 1.32E-04
1167 259019.7 4084816 1.51E-03 2.30E-04 1.24E-04
1168 259029.4 4084838 1.42E-03 2.16E-04 1.17E-04
430
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
1075 258777.8 4084505 2.72E-03 4.14E-04 2.24E-04
1076 258787.9 4084528 2.80E-03 4.26E-04 2.31E-04
1077 258797.9 4084550 2.86E-03 4.36E-04 2.36E-04
1078 258807.9 4084572 2.90E-03 4.42E-04 2.39E-04
1079 258818 4084594 2.92E-03 4.45E-04 2.41E-04
1080 258828 4084616 2.92E-03 4.45E-04 2.41E-04
1081 258838 4084638 2.90E-03 4.41E-04 2.39E-04
1082 258848.1 4084661 2.85E-03 4.34E-04 2.35E-04
1083 258858.1 4084683 2.77E-03 4.22E-04 2.29E-04
1084 258868.1 4084705 2.68E-03 4.08E-04 2.21E-04
1085 258878.2 4084727 2.57E-03 3.92E-04 2.12E-04
1086 258888.2 4084749 2.45E-03 3.73E-04 2.02E-04
1087 258898.2 4084771 2.31E-03 3.52E-04 1.91E-04
1088 258908.3 4084794 2.17E-03 3.31E-04 1.79E-04
1089 258918.3 4084816 2.04E-03 3.10E-04 1.68E-04
1090 258928.3 4084838 1.90E-03 2.89E-04 1.57E-04
1091 258938.4 4084860 1.77E-03 2.69E-04 1.46E-04
1092 258948.4 4084882 1.64E-03 2.50E-04 1.35E-04
1093 258334 4084323 1.27E-03 1.93E-04 1.04E-04
1094 258309.7 4084324 1.22E-03 1.86E-04 l.OlE-04
1095 258285.4 4084325 1.17E-03 1.79E-04 9.67E-05
1096 258261 4084326 1.13E-03 1.71E-04 9.27E-05
1097 258236.7 4084327 1.08E-03 1.64E-04 8.87E-05
1098 258212.4 4084328 1.03E-03 1.56E-04 8.46E-05
1099 258188 4084329 9.77E-04 1.49E-04 8.06E-05
1100 258163.7 4084330 9.29E-04 1.41E-04 7.66E-05
1101 258139.4 4084331 8.81E-04 1.34E-04 7.26E-05
1102 258115.1 4084332 8.34E-04 1.27E-04 6.87E-05
1103 258090.7 4084333 7.89E-04 1.20E-04 6.50E-05
1104 258066.4 4084334 7.46E-04 1.14E-04 6.15E-05
1105 258042.1 4084335 7.05E-04 1.07E-04 5.81E-05
1106 258017.7 4084336 6.66E-04 1.02E-04 5.49E-05
1107 257993.4 4084337 6.30E-04 9.60E-05 5.19E-05
1108 257969.1 4084338 5.96E-04 9.09E-05 4.92E-05
1109 257944.7 4084339 5.65E-04 8.61E-05 4.66E-05
1110 257920.4 4084340 5.36E-04 8.16E-05 4.41E-05
nil 257896.1 4084341 5.08E-04 7.74E-05 4.19E-05
1112 257871.7 4084342 4.83E-04 7.36E-05 3.98E-05
1113 257847.4 4084343 4.59E-04 7.00E-05 3.79E-05
1114 257823.1 4084344 4.37E-04 6.66E-05 3.60E-05
1115 257798.7 4084345 4.17E-04 6.35E-05 3.44E-05
1116 257774.4 4084346 3.98E-04 6.06E-05 3.28E-05
1117 257750.1 4084347 3.81E-04 5.80E-05 3.14E-05
1118 257725.7 4084348 3.65E-04 5.56E-05 3.01E-05
1119 257701.4 4084349 3.50E-04 5.33E-05 2.89E-05
1120 257677.1 4084350 3.37E-04 5.13E-05 2.78E-05
1121 257652.7 4084351 3.25E-04 4.94E-05 2.68E-05
431
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
1028 258216.5 4084427 1.61E-03 2.45E-04 1.32E-04
1029 258192.2 4084428 1.53E-03 2.34E-04 1.27E-04
1030 258167.8 4084429 1.46E-03 2.23E-04 1.21E-04
1031 258143.5 4084430 1.39E-03 2.12E-04 1.15E-04
1032 258119.2 4084431 1.32E-03 2.01E-04 1.09E-04
1033 258094.8 4084432 1.25E-03 1.90E-04 1.03E-04
1034 258070.5 4084433 1.18E-03 1.79E-04 9.70E-05
1035 258046.2 4084434 l.llE-03 1.69E-04 9.14E-05
1036 258021.8 4084435 1.04E-03 1.59E-04 8.59E-05
1037 257997.5 4084436 9.79E-04 1.49E-04 8.07E-05
1038 257973.2 4084437 9.19E-04 1.40E-04 7.57E-05
1039 257948.8 4084438 8.62E-04 1.31E-04 7.10E-05
1040 257924.5 4084439 8.08E-04 1.23E-04 6.66E-05
1041 257900.2 4084440 7.58E-04 1.15E-04 6.25E-05
1042 257875.8 4084441 7.11E-04 1.08E-04 5.86E-05
1043 257851.5 4084442 6.68E-04 1.02E-04 5.51E-05
1044 257827.2 4084443 6.28E-04 9.57E-05 5.18E-05
1045 257802.8 4084444 5.91E-04 9.01E-05 4.87E-05
1046 257778.5 4084445 5.58E-04 8.50E-05 4.60E-05
1047 257754.2 4084446 5.28E-04 8.04E-05 4.35E-05
1048 257729.9 4084447 5.01E-04 7.63E-05 4.13E-05
1049 257705.5 4084448 4.76E-04 7.25E-05 3.92E-05
1050 257681.2 4084449 4.54E-04 6.92E-05 3.74E-05
1051 257656.9 4084450 4.34E-04 6.61E-05 3.58E-05
1052 257632.5 4084451 4.16E-04 6.34E-05 3.43E-05
1053 257608.2 4084452 4.00E-04 6.09E-05 3.29E-05
1054 257583.9 4084453 3.84E-04 5.86E-05 3.17E-05
1055 257559.5 4084454 3.70E-04 5.64E-05 3.05E-05
1056 257535.2 4084455 3.57E-04 5.44E-05 2.94E-05
1057 258356.9 4084331 1.36E-03 2.07E-04 1.12E-04
1058 258379.7 4084339 1.45E-03 2.21E-04 1.20E-04
1059 258402.5 4084348 1.55E-03 2.36E-04 1.28E-04
1060 258425.4 4084356 1.65E-03 2.51E-04 1.36E-04
1061 258448.2 4084365 1.74E-03 2.66E-04 1.44E-04
1062 258471 4084373 1.84E-03 2.81E-04 1.52E-04
1063 258493.8 4084382 1.94E-03 2.95E-04 1.60E-04
1064 258516.7 4084390 2.03E-03 3.10E-04 1.68E-04
1065 258539.5 4084399 2.13E-03 3.24E-04 1.75E-04
1066 258562.3 4084407 2.22E-03 3.38E-04 1.83E-04
1067 258585.2 4084416 2.30E-03 3.50E-04 1.90E-04
1068 258608 4084424 2.38E-03 3.62E-04 1.96E-04
1069 258630.8 4084432 2.45E-03 3.73E-04 2.02E-04
1070 258653.6 4084441 2.51E-03 3.82E-04 2.07E-04
1071 258676.5 4084449 2.56E-03 3.90E-04 2.11E-04
1072 258699.3 4084458 2.60E-03 3.96E-04 2.14E-04
1073 258722.1 4084466 2.62E-03 3.99E-04 2.16E-04
1074 258745 4084475 2.63E-03 4.01E-04 2.17E-04
432
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
981 257807 4084544 9.26E-04 1.41E-04 7.63E-05
982 257782.6 4084545 8.60E-04 1.31E-04 7.09E-05
983 257758.3 4084546 8.01E-04 1.22E-04 6.60E-05
984 257734 4084547 7.48E-04 1.14E-04 6.16E-05
985 257709.6 4084548 7.00E-04 1.07E-04 5.77E-05
986 257685.3 4084549 6.57E-04 l.OOE-04 5.42E-05
987 257661 4084550 6.19E-04 9.43E-05 5.10E-05
988 257636.6 4084551 5.85E-04 8.91E-05 4.82E-05
989 257612.3 4084552 5.54E-04 8.43E-05 4.56E-05
990 257588 4084553 5.25E-04 8.01E-05 4.33E-05
991 257563.6 4084554 5.00E-04 7.61E-05 4.12E-05
992 257539.3 4084555 4.76E-04 7.25E-05 3.92E-05
993 258360.7 4084431 2.05E-03 3.12E-04 1.69E-04
994 258383.3 4084439 2.18E-03 3.32E-04 1.80E-04
995 258405.9 4084448 2.31E-03 3.51E-04 1.90E-04
996 258428.5 4084456 2.44E-03 3.71E-04 2.01E-04
997 258451.1 4084464 2.56E-03 3.90E-04 2.11E-04
998 258473.7 4084473 2.68E-03 4.09E-04 2.21E-04
999 258496.3 4084481 2.80E-03 4.27E-04 2.31E-04
1000 258518.9 4084489 2.92E-03 4.44E-04 2.40E-04
1001 258541.5 4084498 3.02E-03 4.61E-04 2.49E-04
1002 258564.1 4084506 3.12E-03 4.75E-04 2.57E-04
1003 258586.6 4084514 3.20E-03 4.88E-04 2.64E-04
1004 258609.2 4084523 3.27E-03 4.99E-04 2.70E-04
1005 258631.8 4084531 3.32E-03 5.06E-04 2.74E-04
1006 258654.4 4084540 3.36E-03 5.11E-04 2.77E-04
1007 258677 4084548 3.37E-03 5.13E-04 2.78E-04
1008 258709.5 4084578 3.47E-03 5.29E-04 2.86E-04
1009 258719.5 4084600 3.58E-03 5.45E-04 2.95E-04
1010 258729.4 4084622 3.66E-03 5.58E-04 3.02E-04
1011 258739.3 4084644 3.71E-03 5.65E-04 3.06E-04
1012 258749.2 4084666 3.72E-03 5.67E-04 3.07E-04
1013 258759.2 4084688 3.69E-03 5.63E-04 3.05E-04
1014 258769.1 4084710 3.63E-03 5.53E-04 2.99E-04
1015 258779 4084732 3.53E-03 5.38E-04 2.91E-04
1016 258789 4084754 3.40E-03 5.17E-04 2.80E-04
1017 258798.9 4084776 3.23E-03 4.93E-04 2.67E-04
1018 258808.8 4084798 3.05E-03 4.65E-04 2.52E-04
1019 258818.8 4084820 2.86E-03 4.35E-04 2.36E-04
1020 258828.7 4084842 2.66E-03 4.05E-04 2.19E-04
1021 258838.6 4084864 2.46E-03 3.75E-04 2.03E-04
1022 258848.5 4084886 2.27E-03 3.46E-04 1.87E-04
1023 258338.1 4084422 1.92E-03 2.93E-04 1.58E-04
1024 258313.8 4084423 1.86E-03 2.84E-04 1.54E-04
1025 258289.5 4084424 1.80E-03 2.75E-04 1.49E-04
1026 258265.2 4084425 1.74E-03 2.65E-04 1.43E-04
1027 258240.8 4084426 1.67E-03 2.55E-04 1.38E-04
433
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
934 257543.4 4084655 6.76E-04 1.03E-04 5.57E-05
935 258364.5 4084531 3.15E-03 4.81E-04 2.60E-04
936 258386.7 4084539 3.33E-03 5.07E-04 2.74E-04
937 258409 4084547 3.50E-03 5.33E-04 2.88E-04
938 258431.2 4084555 3.66E-03 5.58E-04 3.02E-04
939 258453.5 4084564 3.82E-03 5.82E-04 3.15E-04
940 258475.7 4084572 3.97E-03 6.05E-04 3.28E-04
941 258498 4084580 4.11E-03 6.26E-04 3.39E-04
942 258520.2 4084588 4.23E-03 6.45E-04 3.49E-04
943 258542.4 4084597 4.33E-03 6.60E-04 3.57E-04
944 258564.7 4084605 4.41E-03 6.72E-04 3.63E-04
945 258586.9 4084613 4.46E-03 6.79E-04 3.67E-04
946 258609.2 4084621 4.47E-03 6.81E-04 3.68E-04
947 258641.2 4084651 4.63E-03 7.06E-04 3.82E-04
948 258651 4084673 4.79E-03 7.29E-04 3.95E-04
949 258660.7 4084694 4.89E-03 7.44E-04 4.03E-04
950 258670.5 4084716 4.93E-03 7.50E-04 4.06E-04
951 258680.3 4084738 4.91E-03 7.48E-04 4.05E-04
952 258690.1 4084759 4.83E-03 7.36E-04 3.98E-04
953 258699.9 4084781 4.69E-03 7.14E-04 3.86E-04
954 258709.6 4084802 4.48E-03 6.83E-04 3.70E-04
955 258719.4 4084824 4.24E-03 6.45E-04 3.49E-04
956 258729.2 4084846 3.96E-03 6.03E-04 3.26E-04
957 258739 4084867 3.66E-03 5.58E-04 3.02E-04
958 258748.7 4084889 3.36E-03 5.12E-04 2.77E-04
959 258342.3 4084522 2.98E-03 4.54E-04 2.46E-04
960 258317.9 4084523 2.92E-03 4.45E-04 2.41E-04
961 258293.6 4084524 2.85E-03 4.35E-04 2.35E-04
962 258269.3 4084525 2.78E-03 4.24E-04 2.29E-04
963 258244.9 4084526 2.70E-03 4.11E-04 2.23E-04
964 258220.6 4084527 2.61E-03 3.98E-04 2.15E-04
965 258196.3 4084528 2.52E-03 3.84E-04 2.08E-04
966 258171.9 4084529 2.43E-03 3.70E-04 2.00E-04
967 258147.6 4084530 2.33E-03 3.54E-04 1.92E-04
968 258123.3 4084531 2.22E-03 3.38E-04 1.83E-04
969 258098.9 4084532 2.11E-03 3.22E-04 1.74E-04
970 258074.6 4084533 2.00E-03 3.05E-04 1.65E-04
971 258050.3 4084534 1.89E-03 2.89E-04 1.56E-04
972 258025.9 4084535 1.78E-03 2.72E-04 1.47E-04
973 258001.6 4084536 1.67E-03 2.55E-04 1.38E-04
974 257977.3 4084537 1.56E-03 2.38E-04 1.29E-04
975 257952.9 4084538 1.46E-03 2.22E-04 1.20E-04
976 257928.6 4084539 1.35E-03 2.06E-04 1.12E-04
977 257904.3 4084540 1.26E-03 1.91E-04 1.04E-04
978 257879.9 4084541 1.16E-03 1.77E-04 9.59E-05
979 257855.6 4084542 1.08E-03 1.64E-04 8.88E-05
980 257831.3 4084543 9.98E-04 1.52E-04 8.23E-05
434
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
887 258454.8 4084662 5.86E-03 8.93E-04 4.83E-04
888 258476.5 4084670 6.03E-03 9.18E-04 4.97E-04
889 258498.2 4084679 6.15E-03 9.37E-04 5.07E-04
890 258519.9 4084687 6.23E-03 9.50E-04 5.14E-04
891 258541.5 4084695 6.26E-03 9.53E-04 5.16E-04
892 258572.8 4084724 6.52E-03 9.93E-04 5.37E-04
893 258582.3 4084745 6.76E-03 1.03E-03 5.57E-04
894 258591.8 4084766 6.88E-03 1.05E-03 5.67E-04
895 258601.4 4084787 6.91E-03 1.05E-03 5.70E-04
896 258610.9 4084808 6.82E-03 1.04E-03 5.62E-04
897 258620.4 4084829 6.61E-03 l.OlE-03 5.45E-04
898 258630 4084850 6.29E-03 9.58E-04 5.18E-04
899 258639.5 4084871 5.88E-03 8.96E-04 4.85E-04
900 258649 4084892 5.42E-03 8.26E-04 4.47E-04
901 258346.4 4084622 4.76E-03 7.24E-04 3.92E-04
902 258322 4084623 4.71E-03 7.17E-04 3.88E-04
903 258297.7 4084624 4.65E-03 7.09E-04 3.83E-04
904 258273.4 4084625 4.58E-03 6.98E-04 3.78E-04
905 258249 4084626 4.50E-03 6.86E-04 3.71E-04
906 258224.7 4084627 4.41E-03 6.72E-04 3.64E-04
907 258200.4 4084628 4.31E-03 6.57E-04 3.55E-04
908 258176 4084629 4.20E-03 6.40E-04 3.46E-04
909 258151.7 4084630 4.08E-03 6.21E-04 3.36E-04
910 258127.4 4084631 3.94E-03 6.01E-04 3.25E-04
911 258103 4084632 3.80E-03 5.79E-04 3.13E-04
912 258078.7 4084633 3.65E-03 5.55E-04 3.00E-04
913 258054.4 4084634 3.48E-03 5.31E-04 2.87E-04
914 258030 4084635 3.32E-03 5.05E-04 2.73E-04
915 258005.7 4084636 3.14E-03 4.79E-04 2.59E-04
916 257981.4 4084637 2.96E-03 4.51E-04 2.44E-04
917 257957.1 4084638 2.77E-03 4.22E-04 2.28E-04
918 257932.7 4084639 2.58E-03 3.93E-04 2.13E-04
919 257908.4 4084640 2.39E-03 3.64E-04 1.97E-04
920 257884.1 4084641 2.20E-03 3.36E-04 1.82E-04
921 257859.7 4084642 2.02E-03 3.08E-04 1.67E-04
922 257835.4 4084643 1.85E-03 2.81E-04 1.52E-04
923 257811.1 4084644 1.68E-03 2.56E-04 1.39E-04
924 257786.7 4084645 1.53E-03 2.33E-04 1.26E-04
925 257762.4 4084646 1.39E-03 2.11E-04 1.14E-04
926 257738.1 4084647 1.26E-03 1.92E-04 1.04E-04
927 257713.7 4084648 1.15E-03 1.75E-04 9.48E-05
928 257689.4 4084649 1.05E-03 1.60E-04 8.67E-05
929 257665.1 4084650 9.66E-04 1.47E-04 7.96E-05
930 257640.7 4084651 8.91E-04 1.36E-04 7.35E-05
931 257616.4 4084652 8.27E-04 1.26E-04 6.81E-05
932 257592.1 4084653 7.70E-04 1.17E-04 6.35E-05
933 257567.7 4084654 7.20E-04 l.lOE-04 5.94E-05
435
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
840 258484 4084722 7.57E-03 1.15E-03 6.24E-04
841 258506.6 4084731 7.62E-03 1.16E-03 6.28E-04
842 258539.1 4084761 7.99E-03 1.22E-03 6.59E-04
843 258549 4084783 8.29E-03 1.26E-03 6.84E-04
844 258558.9 4084805 8.44E-03 1.29E-03 6.95E-04
845 258568.9 4084827 8.40E-03 1.28E-03 6.93E-04
846 258578.8 4084849 8.17E-03 1.24E-03 6.73E-04
847 258588.7 4084871 7.75E-03 1.18E-03 6.39E-04
848 258598.6 4084893 7.19E-03 l.lOE-03 5.93E-04
849 258348.4 4084672 6.11E-03 9.30E-04 5.03E-04
850 258324.1 4084673 6.08E-03 9.26E-04 5.01E-04
851 258299.8 4084674 6.04E-03 9.20E-04 4.98E-04
852 258275.4 4084675 5.98E-03 9.11E-04 4.93E-04
853 258251.1 4084676 5.91E-03 9.00E-04 4.87E-04
854 258226.8 4084677 5.82E-03 8.87E-04 4.80E-04
855 258202.4 4084678 5.73E-03 8.72E-04 4.72E-04
856 258178.1 4084679 5.61E-03 8.55E-04 4.63E-04
857 258153.8 4084680 5.49E-03 8.36E-04 4.52E-04
858 258129.4 4084681 5.35E-03 8.15E-04 4.41E-04
859 258105.1 4084682 5.20E-03 7.92E-04 4.28E-04
860 258080.8 4084683 5.03E-03 7.66E-04 4.15E-04
861 258056.4 4084684 4.85E-03 7.39E-04 4.00E-04
862 258032.1 4084685 4.65E-03 7.09E-04 3.83E-04
863 258007.8 4084686 4.44E-03 6.77E-04 3.66E-04
864 257983.4 4084687 4.22E-03 6.43E-04 3.48E-04
865 257959.1 4084688 3.98E-03 6.07E-04 3.28E-04
866 257934.8 4084689 3.74E-03 5.69E-04 3.08E-04
867 257910.4 4084690 3.48E-03 5.30E-04 2.87E-04
868 257886.1 4084691 3.22E-03 4.90E-04 2.65E-04
869 257861.8 4084692 2.96E-03 4.50E-04 2.44E-04
870 257837.4 4084693 2.69E-03 4.10E-04 2.22E-04
871 257813.1 4084694 2.44E-03 3.72E-04 2.01E-04
872 257788.8 4084695 2.20E-03 3.35E-04 1.81E-04
873 257764.5 4084696 1.97E-03 3.00E-04 1.63E-04
874 257740.1 4084697 1.77E-03 2.69E-04 1.46E-04
875 257715.8 4084698 1.58E-03 2.41E-04 1.30E-04
876 257691.5 4084699 1.42E-03 2.16E-04 1.17E-04
877 257667.1 4084700 1.28E-03 1.95E-04 1.06E-04
878 257642.8 4084701 1.16E-03 1.77E-04 9.58E-05
879 257618.5 4084702 1.06E-03 1.62E-04 8.74E-05
880 257594.1 4084703 9.75E-04 1.48E-04 8.03E-05
881 257569.8 4084704 9.01E-04 1.37E-04 7.43E-05
882 257545.5 4084705 8.38E-04 1.28E-04 6.90E-05
883 258368 4084630 5.00E-03 7.61E-04 4.12E-04
884 258389.7 4084638 5.23E-03 7.97E-04 4.31E-04
885 258411.4 4084646 5.46E-03 8.31E-04 4.50E-04
886 258433.1 4084654 5.67E-03 8.63E-04 4.67E-04
436
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
793 257598.2 4084803 1.83E-03 2.79E-04 1.51E-04
794 257573.9 4084804 1.62E-03 2.46E-04 1.33E-04
795 257549.6 4084805 1.45E-03 2.21E-04 1.19E-04
796 258371.1 4084730 8.36E-03 1.27E-03 6.89E-04
797 258412.4 4084745 9.01E-03 1.37E-03 7.43E-04
798 258453.7 4084760 9.45E-03 1.44E-03 7.79E-04
799 258504.1 4084796 l.OOE-02 1.53E-03 8.26E-04
800 258522.3 4084836 1.06E-02 1.62E-03 8.75E-04
801 258540.4 4084876 1.03E-02 1.56E-03 8.45E-04
802 258326.1 4084723 8.01E-03 1.22E-03 6.60E-04
803 258301.8 4084724 7.99E-03 1.22E-03 6.59E-04
804 258277.5 4084725 7.96E-03 1.21E-03 6.56E-04
805 258253.1 4084726 7.91E-03 1.20E-03 6.52E-04
806 258228.8 4084727 7.84E-03 1.19E-03 6.46E-04
807 258204.5 4084728 7.76E-03 1.18E-03 6.39E-04
808 258180.1 4084729 7.66E-03 1.17E-03 6.31E-04
809 258155.8 4084730 7.54E-03 1.15E-03 6.21E-04
810 258131.5 4084731 7.40E-03 1.13E-03 6.10E-04
811 258107.2 4084732 7.25E-03 l.lOE-03 5.98E-04
812 258082.8 4084733 7.08E-03 1.08E-03 5.83E-04
813 258058.5 4084734 6.88E-03 1.05E-03 5.67E-04
814 258034.2 4084735 6.67E-03 1.02E-03 5.50E-04
815 258009.8 4084736 6.43E-03 9.80E-04 5.30E-04
816 257985.5 4084737 6.17E-03 9.40E-04 5.09E-04
817 257961.2 4084738 5.89E-03 8.97E-04 4.85E-04
818 257936.8 4084739 5.58E-03 8.50E-04 4.60E-04
819 257912.5 4084740 5.25E-03 8.00E-04 4.33E-04
820 257888.2 4084741 4.90E-03 7.47E-04 4.04E-04
821 257863.8 4084742 4.54E-03 6.91E-04 3.74E-04
822 257839.5 4084743 4.16E-03 6.34E-04 3.43E-04
823 257815.2 4084744 3.78E-03 5.75E-04 3.11E-04
824 257790.8 4084745 3.39E-03 5.17E-04 2.80E-04
825 257766.5 4084746 3.02E-03 4.61E-04 2.49E-04
826 257742.2 4084747 2.67E-03 4.07E-04 2.20E-04
827 257717.8 4084748 2.35E-03 3.58E-04 1.94E-04
828 257693.5 4084749 2.06E-03 3.14E-04 1.70E-04
829 257669.2 4084750 1.82E-03 2.77E-04 1.50E-04
830 257644.8 4084751 1.61E-03 2.45E-04 1.33E-04
831 257620.5 4084752 1.43E-03 2.19E-04 1.18E-04
832 257596.2 4084753 1.29E-03 1.97E-04 1.06E-04
833 257571.9 4084754 1.17E-03 1.79E-04 9.68E-05
834 257547.5 4084755 1.08E-03 1.64E-04 8.86E-05
835 258371 4084681 6.41E-03 9.77E-04 5.29E-04
836 258393.6 4084689 6.71E-03 1.02E-03 5.53E-04
837 258416.2 4084697 6.99E-03 1.06E-03 5.76E-04
838 258438.8 4084706 7.23E-03 l.lOE-03 5.96E-04
839 258461.4 4084714 7.43E-03 1.13E-03 6.13E-04
437
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
746 257722 4084848 7.46E-03 1.14E-03 6.15E-04
747 257697.6 4084849 6.40E-03 9.75E-04 5.27E-04
748 257673.3 4084850 5.36E-03 8.16E-04 4.41E-04
749 257649 4084851 4.39E-03 6.68E-04 3.62E-04
750 257624.6 4084852 3.56E-03 5.42E-04 2.93E-04
751 257600.3 4084853 2.91E-03 4.43E-04 2.40E-04
752 257576 4084854 2.43E-03 3.71E-04 2.01E-04
753 257551.6 4084855 2.09E-03 3.19E-04 1.73E-04
754 258374.2 4084780 1.13E-02 1.73E-03 9.34E-04
755 258395.9 4084788 1.18E-02 1.80E-03 9.73E-04
756 258417.6 4084796 1.22E-02 1.85E-03 l.OOE-03
757 258439.3 4084804 1.24E-02 1.88E-03 1.02E-03
758 258470.5 4084833 1.32E-02 2.01E-03 1.09E-03
759 258480 4084854 1.38E-02 2.11E-03 1.14E-03
760 258489.6 4084876 1.39E-02 2.12E-03 1.15E-03
761 258499.1 4084897 1.36E-02 2.07E-03 1.12E-03
762 258352.5 4084772 1.08E-02 1.65E-03 8.91E-04
763 258328.2 4084773 1.09E-02 1.66E-03 8.97E-04
764 258303.9 4084774 1.09E-02 1.66E-03 9.01E-04
765 258279.5 4084775 1.09E-02 1.67E-03 9.02E-04
766 258255.2 4084776 1.09E-02 1.66E-03 9.01E-04
767 258230.9 4084777 1.09E-02 1.66E-03 8.98E-04
768 258206.5 4084778 1.08E-02 1.65E-03 8.93E-04
769 258182.2 4084779 1.08E-02 1.64E-03 8.87E-04
770 258157.9 4084780 1.07E-02 1.62E-03 8.79E-04
771 258133.5 4084781 1.05E-02 1.61E-03 8.69E-04
772 258109.2 4084782 1.04E-02 1.59E-03 8.58E-04
773 258084.9 4084783 1.02E-02 1.56E-03 8.44E-04
774 258060.5 4084784 l.OOE-02 1.53E-03 8.28E-04
775 258036.2 4084785 9.83E-03 1.50E-03 8.10E-04
776 258011.9 4084786 9.58E-03 1.46E-03 7.90E-04
777 257987.5 4084787 9.30E-03 1.42E-03 7.66E-04
778 257963.2 4084788 8.98E-03 1.37E-03 7.40E-04
779 257938.9 4084789 8.62E-03 1.31E-03 7.11E-04
780 257914.6 4084790 8.23E-03 1.25E-03 6.78E-04
781 257890.2 4084791 7.79E-03 1.19E-03 6.42E-04
782 257865.9 4084792 7.31E-03 l.llE-03 6.03E-04
783 257841.6 4084793 6.80E-03 1.04E-03 5.61E-04
784 257817.2 4084794 6.25E-03 9.52E-04 5.15E-04
785 257792.9 4084795 5.67E-03 8.64E-04 4.68E-04
786 257768.6 4084796 5.08E-03 7.74E-04 4.19E-04
787 257744.2 4084797 4.48E-03 6.82E-04 3.69E-04
788 257719.9 4084798 3.90E-03 5.94E-04 3.21E-04
789 257695.6 4084799 3.35E-03 5.10E-04 2.76E-04
790 257671.2 4084800 2.86E-03 4.36E-04 2.36E-04
791 257646.9 4084801 2.44E-03 3.72E-04 2.01E-04
792 257622.6 4084802 2.10E-03 3.20E-04 1.73E-04
438
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
699 257990.6 4084862 1.91E-02 2.91E-03 1.58E-03
700 257966.3 4084863 1.88E-02 2.86E-03 1.55E-03
701 257942 4084864 1.84E-02 2.81E-03 1.52E-03
702 257917.6 4084865 1.80E-02 2.74E-03 1.48E-03
703 257893.3 4084866 1.75E-02 2.66E-03 1.44E-03
704 257869 4084867 1.69E-02 2.57E-03 1.39E-03
705 257844.6 4084868 1.62E-02 2.47E-03 1.33E-03
706 257820.3 4084869 1.54E-02 2.35E-03 1.27E-03
707 257796 4084870 1.45E-02 2.21E-03 1.19E-03
708 257771.6 4084871 1.35E-02 2.05E-03 l.llE-03
709 257747.3 4084872 1.23E-02 1.87E-03 l.OlE-03
710 257723 4084873 l.lOE-02 1.68E-03 9.06E-04
711 257698.6 4084874 9.58E-03 1.46E-03 7.89E-04
712 257674.3 4084875 8.07E-03 1.23E-03 6.65E-04
713 257650 4084876 6.55E-03 9.97E-04 5.40E-04
714 257625.6 4084877 5.14E-03 7.83E-04 4.24E-04
715 257601.3 4084878 3.99E-03 6.08E-04 3.29E-04
716 257577 4084879 3.17E-03 4.84E-04 2.62E-04
717 257552.7 4084880 2.63E-03 4.01E-04 2.17E-04
718 258372.7 4084829 1.62E-02 2.46E-03 1.33E-03
719 258408.8 4084842 1.70E-02 2.60E-03 1.40E-03
720 258434.8 4084866 1.84E-02 2.80E-03 1.52E-03
721 258330.2 4084823 1.57E-02 2.39E-03 1.29E-03
722 258305.9 4084824 1.58E-02 2.41E-03 1.31E-03
723 258281.6 4084825 1.59E-02 2.43E-03 1.31E-03
724 258257.3 4084826 1.60E-02 2.44E-03 1.32E-03
725 258232.9 4084827 1.60E-02 2.44E-03 1.32E-03
726 258208.6 4084828 1.60E-02 2.44E-03 1.32E-03
727 258184.3 4084829 1.60E-02 2.43E-03 1.32E-03
728 258159.9 4084830 1.59E-02 2.43E-03 1.31E-03
729 258135.6 4084831 1.58E-02 2.41E-03 1.31E-03
730 258111.3 4084832 1.57E-02 2.40E-03 1.30E-03
731 258086.9 4084833 1.56E-02 2.38E-03 1.29E-03
732 258062.6 4084834 1.54E-02 2.35E-03 1.27E-03
733 258038.3 4084835 1.52E-02 2.32E-03 1.25E-03
734 258013.9 4084836 1.50E-02 2.28E-03 1.23E-03
735 257989.6 4084837 1.47E-02 2.24E-03 1.21E-03
736 257965.3 4084838 1.44E-02 2.19E-03 1.18E-03
737 257940.9 4084839 1.40E-02 2.13E-03 1.15E-03
738 257916.6 4084840 1.36E-02 2.06E-03 1.12E-03
739 257892.3 4084841 1.31E-02 1.99E-03 1.08E-03
740 257867.9 4084842 1.25E-02 1.90E-03 1.03E-03
741 257843.6 4084843 1.18E-02 1.81E-03 9.77E-04
742 257819.3 4084844 l.llE-02 1.70E-03 9.17E-04
743 257794.9 4084845 1.03E-02 1.57E-03 8.51E-04
744 257770.6 4084846 9.44E-03 1.44E-03 7.78E-04
745 257746.3 4084847 8.48E-03 1.29E-03 6.99E-04
439
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
652 258283.6 4084875 2.64E-02 4.03E-03 2.18E-03
653 258259.3 4084876 2.67E-02 4.06E-03 2.20E-03
654 258235 4084877 2.68E-02 4.08E-03 2.21E-03
655 258210.6 4084878 2.69E-02 4.10E-03 2.22E-03
656 258186.3 4084879 2.69E-02 4.10E-03 2.22E-03
657 258162 4084880 2.69E-02 4.10E-03 2.22E-03
658 258137.6 4084881 2.69E-02 4.10E-03 2.22E-03
659 258113.3 4084882 2.68E-02 4.09E-03 2.21E-03
660 258089 4084883 2.68E-02 4.08E-03 2.21E-03
661 258064.6 4084884 2.66E-02 4.06E-03 2.19E-03
662 258040.3 4084885 2.64E-02 4.03E-03 2.18E-03
663 258016 4084886 2.62E-02 4,00E-03 2.16E-03
664 257991.7 4084887 2.60E-02 3.96E-03 2.14E-03
665 257967.3 4084888 2.57E-02 3.91E-03 2.12E-03
666 257943 4084889 2.53E-02 3.85E-03 2.08E-03
667 257918.7 4084890 2.49E-02 3.79E-03 2.05E-03
668 257894.3 4084891 2.43E-02 3.71E-03 2.01E-03
669 257870 4084892 2.38E-02 3.62E-03 1.96E-03
670 257845.7 4084893 2.30E-02 3.51E-03 1.90E-03
671 257821.3 4084894 2.22E-02 3.38E-03 1.83E-03
672 257797 4084895 2.12E-02 3.23E-03 1.75E-03
673 257772.7 4084896 2.01E-02 3.06E-03 1.65E-03
674 257748.3 4084897 1.87E-02 2.85E-03 1.54E-03
675 257724 4084898 1.71E-02 2.61E-03 1.41E-03
676 257699.7 4084899 1.53E-02 2.33E-03 1.26E-03
677 257675.3 4084900 1.32E-02 2.01E-03 1.09E-03
678 257651 4084901 1.09E-02 1.66E-03 8.97E-04
679 257626.7 4084902 8.42E-03 1.28E-03 6.94E-04
680 257602.3 4084903 6.15E-03 9.37E-04 5.07E-04
681 257578 4084904 4.48E-03 6.82E-04 3.69E-04
682 257553.7 4084905 3.49E-03 5.31E-04 2.88E-04
683 258373.7 4084854 2.01E-02 3.07E-03 1.66E-03
684 258417.8 4084885 2.28E-02 3.47E-03 1.88E-03
685 258331.3 4084848 1.96E-02 2.99E-03 1.62E-03
686 258306.9 4084849 1.99E-02 3.03E-03 1.64E-03
687 258282.6 4084850 2.00E-02 3.05E-03 1.65E-03
688 258258.3 4084851 2.02E-02 3.07E-03 1.66E-03
689 258233.9 4084852 2.02E-02 3.08E-03 1.67E-03
690 258209.6 4084853 2.03E-02 3.09E-03 1.67E-03
691 258185.3 4084854 2.03E-02 3.09E-03 1.67E-03
692 258160.9 4084855 2.02E-02 3.08E-03 1.67E-03
693 258136.6 4084856 2.02E-02 3.07E-03 1.66E-03
694 258112.3 4084857 2.01E-02 3.06E-03 1.65E-03
695 258088 4084858 2.00E-02 3.04E-03 1.64E-03
696 258063.6 4084859 1.98E-02 3.02E-03 1.63E-03
697 258039.3 4084860 1.96E-02 2.99E-03 1.62E-03
698 258015 4084861 1.94E-02 2.95E-03 1.60E-03
440
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
605 258453.3 4086608 3.12E-04 4.76E-05 2.57E-05
606 259863.8 4085076 3.03E-04 4.62E-05 2.50E-05
607 259863.1 4085052 3.07E-04 4.68E-05 2.53E-05
608 259862.4 4085027 3.12E-04 4.75E-05 2.57E-05
609 259861.7 4085002 3.18E-04 4.85E-05 2.62E-05
610 259860.9 4084977 3.26E-04 4.96E-05 2.68E-05
611 259860.2 4084953 3.34E-04 5.09E-05 2.76E-05
612 259859.5 4084928 3.44E-04 5.24E-05 2.84E-05
613 259858.8 4084903 3.54E-04 5.40E-05 2.92E-05
614 259858 4084878 3.64E-04 5.55E-05 3.00E-05
615 258357.7 4084897 3.53E-02 5.38E-03 2.91E-03
616 258333.3 4084898 3.70E-02 5.64E-03 3.05E-03
617 258309 4084899 3.79E-02 5.77E-03 3.12E-03
618 258284.7 4084900 3.84E-02 5.85E-03 3.17E-03
619 258260.3 4084901 3.88E-02 5.91E-03 3.20E-03
620 258236 4084902 3.91E-02 5.96E-03 3.22E-03
621 258211.7 4084903 3.93E-02 5.98E-03 3.24E-03
622 258187.3 4084904 3.93E-02 5.99E-03 3.24E-03
623 258163 4084905 3.94E-02 6.00E-03 3.24E-03
624 258138.7 4084906 3.93E-02 5.99E-03 3.24E-03
625 258114.3 4084907 3.93E-02 5.98E-03 3.24E-03
626 258090 4084908 3.92E-02 5.97E-03 3.23E-03
627 258065.7 4084909 3.90E-02 5.95E-03 3.22E-03
628 258041.3 4084910 3.89E-02 5.92E-03 3.20E-03
629 258017 4084911 3.87E-02 5.89E-03 3.19E-03
630 257992.7 4084912 3.84E-02 5.85E-03 3.17E-03
631 257968.3 4084913 3.81E-02 5.81E-03 3.14E-03
632 257944 4084914 3.78E-02 5.76E-03 3.12E-03
633 257919.7 4084915 3.74E-02 5.69E-03 3.08E-03
634 257895.4 4084916 3.69E-02 5.62E-03 3.04E-03
635 257871 4084917 3.63E-02 5.53E-03 2.99E-03
636 257846.7 4084918 3.56E-02 5.42E-03 2.93E-03
637 257822.4 4084919 3.47E-02 5.29E-03 2.86E-03
638 257798 4084920 3.37E-02 5.13E-03 2.78E-03
639 257773.7 4084921 3.24E-02 4.94E-03 2.67E-03
640 257749.4 4084922 3.09E-02 4.71E-03 2.55E-03
641 257725 4084923 2.91E-02 4.43E-03 2.40E-03
642 257700.7 4084924 2.69E-02 4.10E-03 2.22E-03
643 257676.4 4084925 2.42E-02 3.68E-03 1.99E-03
644 257652 4084926 2.08E-02 3.17E-03 1.72E-03
645 257627.7 4084927 1.67E-02 2.55E-03 1.38E-03
646 257603.4 4084928 1.20E-02 1.82E-03 9.87E-04
647 257579 4084929 7.49E-03 1.14E-03 6.17E-04
648 257554.7 4084930 5.06E-03 7.71E-04 4.17E-04
649 258374.7 4084879 2.62E-02 4.00E-03 2.16E-03
650 258332.3 4084873 2.57E-02 3.92E-03 2.12E-03
651 258308 4084874 2.62E-02 3.98E-03 2.16E-03
441
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
558 259489.5 4086072 1.92E-04 2.93E-05 1.59E-05
559 259480.8 4086095 1.91E-04 2.90E-05 1.57E-05
560 259472.1 4086118 1.89E-04 2.88E-05 1.56E-05
561 259440.9 4086152 1.89E-04 2.88E-05 1.56E-05
562 259418.5 4086162 1.91E-04 2.91E-05 1.57E-05
563 259396 4086172 1.93E-04 2.94E-05 1.59E-05
564 259373.6 4086183 1.95E-04 2.97E-05 1.61E-05
565 259351.1 4086193 1.97E-04 3.00E-05 1.62E-05
566 259328.7 4086203 1.99E-04 3.03E-05 1.64E-05
567 259306.2 4086214 2.01E-04 3.06E-05 1.66E-05
568 259283.8 4086224 2.03E-04 3.09E-05 1.67E-05
569 259261.3 4086235 2.05E-04 3.12E-05 1.69E-05
570 259238.9 4086245 2.07E-04 3.16E-05 1.71E-05
571 259216.4 4086255 2.10E-04 3.20E-05 1.73E-05
572 259194 4086266 2.13E-04 3.24E-05 1.75E-05
573 259171.6 4086276 2.16E-04 3.28E-05 1.78E-05
574 259149.1 4086286 2.19E-04 3.33E-05 1.80E-05
575 259126.7 4086297 2.22E-04 3.39E-05 1.83E-05
576 259104.2 4086307 2.26E-04 3.45E-05 1.87E-05
577 259081.8 4086318 2.31E-04 3.52E-05 1.90E-05
578 259059.3 4086328 2.36E-04 3.59E-05 1.94E-05
579 259036.9 4086338 2.41E-04 3.67E-05 1.98E-05
580 259014.4 4086349 2.46E-04 3.75E-05 2.03E-05
581 258992 4086359 2.51E-04 3.82E-05 2.07E-05
582 258969.5 4086370 2.56E-04 3.90E-05 2.11E-05
583 258947.1 4086380 2.61E-04 3.97E-05 2.15E-05
584 258924.6 4086390 2.64E-04 4.03E-05 2.18E-05
585 258902.2 4086401 2.68E-04 4.08E-05 2.21E-05
586 258879.8 4086411 2.70E-04 4.12E-05 2.23E-05
587 258857.3 4086421 2.72E-04 4.15E-05 2.25E-05
588 258834.9 4086432 2.74E-04 4.17E-05 2.26E-05
589 258812.4 4086442 2.75E-04 4.20E-05 2.27E-05
590 258790 4086453 2.77E-04 4.21E-05 2.28E-05
591 258767.5 4086463 2.78E-04 4.24E-05 2.29E-05
592 258745.1 4086473 2.79E-04 4.26E-05 2.30E-05
593 258722.6 4086484 2.81E-04 4.28E-05 2.31E-05
594 258700.2 4086494 2.82E-04 4.30E-05 2.33E-05
595 258677.7 4086504 2.84E-04 4.33E-05 2.34E-05
596 258655.3 4086515 2.87E-04 4.37E-05 2.36E-05
597 258632.8 4086525 2.89E-04 4.40E-05 2.38E-05
598 258610.4 4086536 2.91E-04 4.44E-05 2.40E-05
599 258588 4086546 2.94E-04 4.48E-05 2.43E-05
600 258565.5 4086556 2.97E-04 4.53E-05 2.45E-05
601 258543.1 4086567 3.00E-04 4.58E-05 2.48E-05
602 258520.6 4086577 3.03E-04 4.62E-05 2.50E-05
603 258498.2 4086588 3.07E-04 4.67E-05 2.53E-05
604 258475.7 4086598 3.10E-04 4.72E-05 2.55E-05
442
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
511 259661 4084983 3.94E-04 6.00E-05 3.25E-05
512 259660.3 4084958 4.06E-04 6.18E-05 3.34E-05
513 259659.6 4084934 4.19E-04 6.38E-05 3.45E-05
514 259658.9 4084909 4.32E-04 6.58E-05 3.56E-05
515 259658.1 4084884 4.45E-04 6.78E-05 3.67E-05
516 259855.1 4085100 3.03E-04 4.62E-05 2.50E-05
517 259846.4 4085123 3.03E-04 4.61E-05 2.50E-05
518 259837.7 4085146 3.03E-04 4.61E-05 2.50E-05
519 259829 4085169 3.02E-04 4.61E-05 2.49E-05
520 259820.3 4085192 3.02E-04 4.60E-05 2.49E-05
521 259811.6 4085215 3.01E-04 4.58E-05 2.48E-05
522 259802.9 4085238 2.98E-04 4.54E-05 2.46E-05
523 259794.2 4085262 2.95E-04 4.50E-05 2.43E-05
524 259785.5 4085285 2.91E-04 4.44E-05 2.40E-05
525 259776.8 4085308 2.87E-04 4.37E-05 2.36E-05
526 259768.1 4085331 2.82E-04 4.29E-05 2.32E-05
527 259759.4 4085354 2.77E-04 4.21E-05 2.28E-05
528 259750.6 4085377 2.71E-04 4.14E-05 2.24E-05
529 259741.9 4085400 2.66E-04 4.06E-05 2.20E-05
530 259733.2 4085424 2.62E-04 3.98E-05 2.16E-05
531 259724.5 4085447 2.57E-04 3.91E-05 2.12E-05
532 259715.8 4085470 2.53E-04 3.85E-05 2.08E-05
533 259707.1 4085493 2.49E-04 3.79E-05 2.05E-05
534 259698.4 4085516 2.45E-04 3.73E-05 2.02E-05
535 259689.7 4085539 2.42E-04 3.68E-05 1.99E-05
536 259681 4085562 2.39E-04 3.64E-05 1.97E-05
537 259672.3 4085586 2.37E-04 3.60E-05 1.95E-05
538 259663.6 4085609 2.34E-04 3.57E-05 1.93E-05
539 259654.9 4085632 2.32E-04 3.54E-05 1.92E-05
540 259646.2 4085655 2.31E-04 3.51E-05 1.90E-05
541 259637.5 4085678 2.29E-04 3.49E-05 1.89E-05
542 259628.8 4085701 2.27E-04 3.47E-05 1.87E-05
543 259620.1 4085724 2.26E-04 3.44E-05 1.86E-05
544 259611.4 4085748 2.24E-04 3.41E-05 1.84E-05
545 259602.6 4085771 2.22E-04 3.39E-05 1.83E-05
546 259593.9 4085794 2.21E-04 3.36E-05 1.82E-05
547 259585.2 4085817 2.19E-04 3.33E-05 1.80E-05
548 259576.5 4085840 2.17E-04 3.31E-05 1.79E-05
549 259567.8 4085863 2.15E-04 3.28E-05 1.77E-05
550 259559.1 4085887 2.13E-04 3.24E-05 1.75E-05
551 259550.4 4085910 2.10E-04 3.20E-05 1.73E-05
552 259541.7 4085933 2.07E-04 3.16E-05 1.71E-05
553 259533 4085956 2.05E-04 3.12E-05 1.69E-05
554 259524.3 4085979 2.02E-04 3.07E-05 1.66E-05
555 259515.6 4086002 1.99E-04 3.03E-05 1.64E-05
556 259506.9 4086025 1.97E-04 3.00E-05 1.62E-05
557 259498.2 4086049 1.94E-04 2.96E-05 1.60E-05
443
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
464 259351.5 4085913 2.32E-04 3.54E-05 1.92E-05
465 259342.9 4085936 2.29E-04 3.49E-05 1.89E-05
466 259334.2 4085959 2.27E-04 3.45E-05 1.87E-05
467 259325.5 4085982 2.25E-04 3.42E-05 1.85E-05
468 259294.5 4086015 2.25E-04 3.42E-05 1.85E-05
469 259272.1 4086026 2.27E-04 3.46E-05 1.87E-05
470 259249.7 4086036 2.30E-04 3.50E-05 1.89E-05
471 259227.3 4086046 2.32E-04 3.54E-05 1.91E-05
472 259205 4086057 2.34E-04 3.57E-05 1.93E-05
473 259182.6 4086067 2.37E-04 3.61E-05 1.95E-05
474 259160.2 4086077 2.39E-04 3.64E-05 1.97E-05
475 259137.9 4086088 2.42E-04 3.69E-05 1.99E-05
476 259115.5 4086098 2.45E-04 3.73E-05 2.02E-05
477 259093.1 4086108 2.48E-04 3.78E-05 2.04E-05
478 259070.7 4086119 2.51E-04 3.83E-05 2.07E-05
479 259048.4 4086129 2.55E-04 3.89E-05 2.10E-05
480 259026 4086139 2.60E-04 3.96E-05 2.14E-05
481 259003.6 4086150 2.65E-04 4.03E-05 2.18E-05
482 258981.3 4086160 2.70E-04 4.11E-05 2.23E-05
483 258958.9 4086171 2.76E-04 4.21E-05 2.28E-05
484 258936.5 4086181 2.82E-04 4.30E-05 2.33E-05
485 258914.2 4086191 2.89E-04 4.40E-05 2.38E-05
486 258891.8 4086202 2.95E-04 4.50E-05 2.43E-05
487 258869.4 4086212 3.01E-04 4.59E-05 2.48E-05
488 258847 4086222 3.07E-04 4.67E-05 2.53E-05
489 258824.7 4086233 3.11E-04 4.74E-05 2.57E-05
490 258802.3 4086243 3.15E-04 4.80E-05 2.60E-05
491 258779.9 4086253 3.18E-04 4.84E-05 2.62E-05
492 258757.6 4086264 3.20E-04 4.88E-05 2.64E-05
493 258735.2 4086274 3.23E-04 4.91E-05 2.66E-05
494 258712.8 4086284 3.25E-04 4.94E-05 2.68E-05
495 258690.4 4086295 3.26E-04 4.97E-05 2.69E-05
496 258668.1 4086305 3.29E-04 5.01E-05 2.71E-05
497 258645.7 4086315 3.31E-04 5.04E-05 2.73E-05
498 258623.3 4086326 3.34E-04 5.09E-05 2.75E-05
499 258601 4086336 3.37E-04 5.13E-05 2.78E-05
500 258578.6 4086346 3.41E-04 5.19E-05 2.81E-05
501 258556.2 4086357 3.44E-04 5.24E-05 2.84E-05
502 258533.8 4086367 3.48E-04 5.31E-05 2.87E-05
503 258511.5 4086377 3.52E-04 5.37E-05 2.90E-05
504 258489.1 4086388 3.57E-04 5.43E-05 2.94E-05
505 258466.7 4086398 3.61E-04 5.50E-05 2.98E-05
506 258444.4 4086408 3.65E-04 5.57E-05 3.01E-05
507 259663.9 4085082 3.63E-04 5.54E-05 3.00E-05
508 259663.2 4085057 3.69E-04 5.62E-05 3.04E-05
509 259662.5 4085033 3.76E-04 5.73E-05 3.10E-05
510 259661.7 4085008 3.84E-04 5.85E-05 3.17E-05
444
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
417 258479.9 4086188 4.29E-04 6.53E-05 3.53E-05
418 258457.7 4086198 4.34E-04 6.62E-05 3.58E-05
419 258435.4 4086209 4.41E-04 6.73E-05 3.64E-05
420 259464 4085088 4.51E-04 6.87E-05 3.72E-05
421 259463.3 4085063 4.60E-04 7.00E-05 3.79E-05
422 259462.6 4085039 4.71E-04 7.17E-05 3.88E-05
423 259461.8 4085014 4.83E-04 7.36E-05 3.98E-05
424 259461.1 4084989 4.98E-04 7.59E-05 4.11E-05
425 259460.4 4084964 5.15E-04 7.84E-05 4.24E-05
426 259459.7 4084939 5.33E-04 8.12E-05 4.39E-05
427 259458.9 4084915 5.51E-04 8.40E-05 4.55E-05
428 259458.2 4084890 5.70E-04 8.68E-05 4.70E-05
429 259655.2 4085105 3.62E-04 5.52E-05 2.99E-05
430 259646.6 4085128 3.62E-04 5.51E-05 2.98E-05
431 259637.9 4085151 3.61E-04 5.50E-05 2.98E-05
432 259629.2 4085174 3.59E-04 5.47E-05 2.96E-05
433 259620.5 4085198 3.57E-04 5.44E-05 2.94E-05
434 259611.8 4085221 3.54E-04 5.39E-05 2.91E-05
435 259603.2 4085244 3.49E-04 5.32E-05 2.88E-05
436 259594.5 4085267 3.44E-04 5.24E-05 2.84E-05
437 259585.8 4085290 3.38E-04 5.15E-05 2.79E-05
438 259577.1 4085313 3.32E-04 5.05E-05 2.73E-05
439 259568.5 4085336 3.25E-04 4.95E-05 2.68E-05
440 259559.8 4085359 3.18E-04 4.85E-05 2.62E-05
441 259551.1 4085382 3.12E-04 4.75E-05 2.57E-05
442 259542.4 4085405 3.06E-04 4.66E-05 2.52E-05
443 259533.8 4085428 3.00E-04 4.58E-05 2.48E-05
444 259525.1 4085451 2.95E-04 4.50E-05 2.43E-05
445 259516.4 4085474 2.90E-04 4.42E-05 2.39E-05
446 259507.7 4085497 2.86E-04 4.36E-05 2.36E-05
447 259499 4085521 2.83E-04 4.31E-05 2.33E-05
448 259490.4 4085544 2.80E-04 4.26E-05 2.31E-05
449 259481.7 4085567 2.77E-04 4.22E-05 2.28E-05
450 259473 4085590 2.74E-04 4.18E-05 2.26E-05
451 259464.3 4085613 2.72E-04 4.14E-05 2.24E-05
452 259455.7 4085636 2.69E-04 4.10E-05 2.22E-05
453 259447 4085659 2.67E-04 4.07E-05 2.20E-05
454 259438.3 4085682 2.65E-04 4.03E-05 2.18E-05
455 259429.6 4085705 2.62E-04 3.99E-05 2.16E-05
456 259421 4085728 2.59E-04 3.95E-05 2.14E-05
457 259412.3 4085751 2.57E-04 3.91E-05 2.11E-05
458 259403.6 4085774 2.53E-04 3.86E-05 2.09E-05
459 259394.9 4085797 2.50E-04 3.81E-05 2.06E-05
460 259386.2 4085820 2.47E-04 3.76E-05 2.03E-05
461 259377.6 4085843 2.43E-04 3.70E-05 2.00E-05
462 259368.9 4085867 2.39E-04 3.64E-05 1.97E-05
463 259360.2 4085890 2.36E-04 3.59E-05 1.94E-05
445
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
370 259317.2 4085478 3.48E-04 5.30E-05 2.87E-05
371 259308.5 4085501 3.43E-04 5.23E-05 2.83E-05
372 259299.9 4085524 3.39E-04 5.17E-05 2.80E-05
373 259291.2 4085547 3.35E-04 5.10E-05 2.76E-05
374 259282.6 4085570 3.31E-04 5.04E-05 2.73E-05
375 259274 4085593 3.27E-04 4.98E-05 2.69E-05
376 259265.3 4085616 3.23E-04 4.92E-05 2.66E-05
377 259256.7 4085639 3.18E-04 4.85E-05 2.62E-05
378 259248.1 4085662 3.14E-04 4.78E-05 2.59E-05
379 259239.4 4085685 3.09E-04 4.71E-05 2.55E-05
380 259230.8 4085708 3.04E-04 4.63E-05 2.51E-05
381 259222.1 4085731 2.99E-04 4.56E-05 2.46E-05
382 259213.5 4085754 2.94E-04 4.48E-05 2.42E-05
383 259204.9 4085777 2.89E-04 4.41E-05 2.38E-05
384 259196.2 4085800 2.85E-04 4.34E-05 2.35E-05
385 259187.6 4085823 2.81E-04 4.28E-05 2.31E-05
386 259179 4085846 2.77E-04 4.22E-05 2.28E-05
387 259148 4085879 2.77E-04 4.21E-05 2.28E-05
388 259125.8 4085889 2.80E-04 4.26E-05 2.31E-05
389 259103.5 4085900 2.83E-04 4.31E-05 2.33E-05
390 259081.2 4085910 2.87E-04 4.37E-05 2.36E-05
391 259059 4085920 2.90E-04 4.42E-05 2.39E-05
392 259036.7 4085931 2.94E-04 4.48E-05 2.42E-05
393 259014.4 4085941 2.98E-04 4.54E-05 2.45E-05
394 258992.2 4085951 3.02E-04 4.60E-05 2.49E-05
395 258969.9 4085962 3.06E-04 4.66E-05 2.52E-05
396 258947.6 4085972 3.10E-04 4.73E-05 2.56E-05
397 258925.3 4085982 3.16E-04 4.81E-05 2.60E-05
398 258903.1 4085992 3.22E-04 4.91E-05 2.65E-05
399 258880.8 4086003 3.29E-04 5.01E-05 2.71E-05
400 258858.5 4086013 3.37E-04 5.13E-05 2.78E-05
401 258836.3 4086023 3.45E-04 5.25E-05 2.84E-05
402 258814 4086034 3.53E-04 5.37E-05 2.91E-05
403 258791.7 4086044 3.60E-04 5.49E-05 2.97E-05
404 258769.5 4086054 3.67E-04 5.59E-05 3.03E-05
405 258747.2 4086065 3.73E-04 5.69E-05 3.08E-05
406 258724.9 4086075 3.79E-04 5.77E-05 3.12E-05
407 258702.6 4086085 3.83E-04 5.84E-05 3.16E-05
408 258680.4 4086095 3.87E-04 5.90E-05 3.19E-05
409 258658.1 4086106 3.91E-04 5.96E-05 3.22E-05
410 258635.8 4086116 3.95E-04 6.01E-05 3.25E-05
411 258613.6 4086126 3.99E-04 6.07E-05 3.29E-05
412 258591.3 4086137 4.03E-04 6.13E-05 3.32E-05
413 258569 4086147 4.07E-04 6.20E-05 3.36E-05
414 258546.8 4086157 4.12E-04 6.27E-05 3.39E-05
415 258524.5 4086168 4.17E-04 6.35E-05 3.44E-05
416 258502.2 4086178 4.22E-04 6.44E-05 3.48E-05
446
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
323 258891 4085794 3.86E-04 5.88E-05 3.18E-05
324 258868.9 4085804 3.92E-04 5.98E-05 3.23E-05
325 258846.8 4085815 3.99E-04 6.08E-05 3.29E-05
326 258824.7 4085825 4.08E-04 6.21E-05 3.36E-05
327 258802.5 4085835 4.16E-04 6.34E-05 3.43E-05
328 258780.4 4085845 4.26E-04 6.49E-05 3.51E-05
329 258758.3 4085856 4.37E-04 6.65E-05 3.60E-05
330 258736.2 4085866 4.47E-04 6.81E-05 3.68E-05
331 258714 4085876 4.57E-04 6.96E-05 3.76E-05
332 258691.9 4085886 4.66E-04 7.10E-05 3.84E-05
333 258669.8 4085896 4.74E-04 7.22E-05 3.91E-05
334 258647.7 4085907 4.81E-04 7.33E-05 3.97E-05
335 258625.5 4085917 4.88E-04 7.43E-05 4.02E-05
336 258603.4 4085927 4.95E-04 7.54E-05 4.08E-05
337 258581.3 4085937 5.01E-04 7.64E-05 4.13E-05
338 258559.2 4085948 5.09E-04 7.75E-05 4.19E-05
339 258537 4085958 5.16E-04 7.87E-05 4.26E-05
340 258514.9 4085968 5.24E-04 7.99E-05 4.32E-05
341 258492.8 4085978 5.33E-04 8.12E-05 4.39E-05
342 258470.7 4085989 5.41E-04 8.25E-05 4.46E-05
343 258448.5 4085999 5.50E-04 8.38E-05 4.54E-05
344 258426.4 4086009 5.59E-04 8.52E-05 4.61E-05
345 259264.1 4085094 5.90E-04 8.99E-05 4.86E-05
346 259263.4 4085069 6.05E-04 9.22E-05 4.99E-05
347 259262.6 4085044 6.23E-04 9.49E-05 5.13E-05
348 259261.9 4085020 6.43E-04 9.79E-05 5.30E-05
349 259261.2 4084995 6.66E-04 l.OlE-04 5.49E-05
350 259260.5 4084970 6.91E-04 1.05E-04 5.70E-05
351 259259.7 4084945 7.19E-04 1.09E-04 5.92E-05
352 259259 4084921 7.47E-04 1.14E-04 6.16E-05
353 259258.3 4084896 7.76E-04 1.18E-04 6.40E-05
354 259455.4 4085111 4.49E-04 6.84E-05 3.70E-05
355 259446.7 4085134 4.47E-04 6.81E-05 3.68E-05
356 259438.1 4085157 4.44E-04 6.76E-05 3.66E-05
357 259429.4 4085180 4.40E-04 6.71E-05 3.63E-05
358 259420.8 4085203 4.35E-04 6.63E-05 3.59E-05
359 259412.2 4085226 4.29E-04 6.53E-05 3.53E-05
360 259403.5 4085249 4.21E-04 6.42E-05 3.47E-05
361 259394.9 4085272 4.13E-04 6.29E-05 3.41E-05
362 259386.3 4085295 4.04E-04 6.16E-05 3.33E-05
363 259377.6 4085318 3.95E-04 6.02E-05 3.26E-05
364 259369 4085341 3.86E-04 5.88E-05 3.18E-05
365 259360.3 4085364 3.78E-04 5.76E-05 3.11E-05
366 259351.7 4085387 3.71E-04 5.65E-05 3.05E-05
367 259343.1 4085410 3.64E-04 5.54E-05 3.00E-05
368 259334.4 4085433 3.58E-04 5.45E-05 2.95E-05
369 259325.8 4085455 3.53E-04 5,38E-05 2.91E-05
447
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
276 258526.8 4085759 6.84E-04 1.04E-04 5.64E-05
277 258504.9 4085769 6.96E-04 1.06E-04 5.74E-05
278 258483 4085779 7.10E-04 1.08E-04 5.85E-05
279 258461.1 4085789 7.25E-04 l.lOE-04 5.97E-05
280 258439.2 4085799 7.40E-04 1.13E-04 6.10E-05
281 258417.3 4085809 7.56E-04 1.15E-04 6.23E-05
282 259064.2 4085100 8.29E-04 1.26E-04 6.84E-05
283 259063.4 4085075 8.60E-04 1.31E-04 7.09E-05
284 259062.7 4085050 8.94E-04 1.36E-04 7.37E-05
285 259062 4085025 9.32E-04 1.42E-04 7.68E-05
286 259061.3 4085001 9.73E-04 1.48E-04 8.02E-05
287 259060.6 4084976 1.02E-03 1.55E-04 8.40E-05
288 259059.8 4084951 1.07E-03 1.63E-04 8.80E-05
289 259059.1 4084926 1.12E-03 1.70E-04 9.22E-05
290 259058.4 4084902 1.17E-03 1.79E-04 9.67E-05
291 259255.5 4085117 5.85E-04 8.91E-05 4.82E-05
292 259246.9 4085139 5.79E-04 8.82E-05 4.77E-05
293 259238.3 4085162 5.72E-04 8.72E-05 4.72E-05
294 259229.8 4085185 5.63E-04 8.58E-05 4.64E-05
295 259221.2 4085208 5.52E-04 8.40E-05 4.55E-05
296 259212.6 4085231 5.40E-04 8.23E-05 4.45E-05
297 259204 4085254 5.28E-04 8.05E-05 4.35E-05
298 259195.4 4085276 5.16E-04 7.86E-05 4.25E-05
299 259186.8 4085299 5.04E-04 7.68E-05 4.16E-05
300 259178.3 4085322 4.93E-04 7.51E-05 4.06E-05
301 259169.7 4085345 4.82E-04 7.35E-05 3.98E-05
302 259161.1 4085368 4.73E-04 7.20E-05 3.90E-05
303 259152.5 4085390 4.64E-04 7.07E-05 3.82E-05
304 259143.9 4085413 4.56E-04 6.94E-05 3.76E-05
305 259135.4 4085436 4.48E-04 6.83E-05 3.69E-05
306 259126.8 4085459 4.41E-04 6.71E-05 3.63E-05
307 259118.2 4085482 4.33E-04 6.60E-05 3.57E-05
308 259109.6 4085505 4.26E-04 6.49E-05 3.51E-05
309 259101 4085527 4.19E-04 6.38E-05 3.45E-05
310 259092.4 4085550 4.11E-04 6.26E-05 3.39E-05
311 259083.9 4085573 4.04E-04 6.15E-05 3.33E-05
312 259075.3 4085596 3.96E-04 6.03E-05 3.26E-05
313 259066.7 4085619 3.88E-04 5.91E-05 3.20E-05
314 259058.1 4085641 3.81E-04 5.80E-05 3.14E-05
315 259049.5 4085664 3.74E-04 5.69E-05 3.08E-05
316 259041 4085687 3.67E-04 5.59E-05 3.03E-05
317 259032.4 4085710 3.61E-04 5.50E-05 2.98E-05
318 259001.7 4085743 3.60E-04 5.48E-05 2.97E-05
319 258979.5 4085753 3.64E-04 5.55E-05 3.00E-05
320 258957.4 4085763 3.69E-04 5.63E-05 3.04E-05
321 258935.3 4085774 3.74E-04 5.70E-05 3.09E-05
322 258913.2 4085784 3.80E-04 5.79E-05 3.13E-05
448
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
229 258434.5 4085699 8.90E-04 1.36E-04 7.34E-05
230 258412.8 4085709 9.10E-04 1.39E-04 7.50E-05
231 258964.2 4085103 1.02E-03 1.56E-04 8.42E-05
232 258963.5 4085078 1.07E-03 1.63E-04 8.80E-05
233 258962.8 4085053 1.12E-03 1.70E-04 9.22E-05
234 258962 4085028 1.17E-03 1.79E-04 9.68E-05
235 258961.3 4085004 1.23E-03 1.88E-04 1.02E-04
236 258960.6 4084979 1.30E-03 1.98E-04 1.07E-04
237 258959.9 4084954 1.37E-03 2.09E-04 1.13E-04
238 258959.2 4084929 1.45E-03 2.20E-04 1.19E-04
239 258958.4 4084905 1.53E-03 2.32E-04 1.26E-04
240 259055.7 4085122 8.17E-04 1.24E-04 6.73E-05
241 259047.2 4085145 8.03E-04 1.22E-04 6.62E-05
242 259038.7 4085167 7.88E-04 1.20E-04 6.49E-05
243 259030.2 4085190 7.69E-04 1.17E-04 6.34E-05
244 259021.7 4085213 7.49E-04 1.14E-04 6.17E-05
245 259013.2 4085235 7.29E-04 l.llE-04 6.01E-05
246 259004.7 4085258 7.10E-04 1.08E-04 5.85E-05
247 258996.2 4085280 6.92E-04 1.05E-04 5.70E-05
248 258987.7 4085303 6.75E-04 1.03E-04 5.56E-05
249 258979.2 4085326 6.59E-04 l.OOE-04 5.43E-05
250 258970.7 4085348 6.43E-04 9.80E-05 5.30E-05
251 258962.2 4085371 6.29E-04 9.58E-05 5.18E-05
252 258953.7 4085393 6.14E-04 9.36E-05 5.06E-05
253 258945.2 4085416 6.00E-04 9.14E-05 4.94E-05
254 258936.7 4085438 5.86E-04 8.92E-05 4.83E-05
255 258928.2 4085461 5.72E-04 8.71E-05 4.71E-05
256 258919.8 4085484 5.58E-04 8.50E-05 4.60E-05
257 258911.3 4085506 5.44E-04 8.29E-05 4.49E-05
258 258902.8 4085529 5.32E-04 8.10E-05 4.38E-05
259 258894.3 4085551 5.20E-04 7.92E-05 4.28E-05
260 258885.8 4085574 5.09E-04 7.75E-05 4.19E-05
261 258855.4 4085607 5.06E-04 7.71E-05 4.17E-05
262 258833.5 4085617 5.14E-04 7.84E-05 4.24E-05
263 258811.6 4085627 5.23E-04 7.97E-05 4.31E-05
264 258789.7 4085637 5.33E-04 8.12E-05 4.39E-05
265 258767.8 4085647 5.43E-04 8.27E-05 4.48E-05
266 258745.9 4085657 5.55E-04 8.45E-05 4.57E-05
267 258724 4085667 5.68E-04 8.65E-05 4.68E-05
268 258702.1 4085678 5.82E-04 8.87E-05 4.80E-05
269 258680.2 4085688 5.97E-04 9.10E-05 4.92E-05
270 258658.3 4085698 6.12E-04 9.33E-05 5.05E-05
271 258636.4 4085708 6.27E-04 9.55E-05 5.17E-05
272 258614.5 4085718 6.40E-04 9.74E-05 5.27E-05
273 258592.6 4085728 6.51E-04 9.92E-05 5.37E-05
274 258570.7 4085738 6.62E-04 l.OlE-04 5.46E-05
275 258548.8 4085749 6.73E-04 1.02E-04 5.55E-05
449
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
182 258472.6 4085580 1.07E-03 1.63E-04 8.83E-05
183 258451.1 4085590 l.lOE-03 1.67E-04 9.03E-05
184 258429.6 4085600 1.12E-03 1.71E-04 9.25E-05
185 258408.1 4085610 1.15E-03 1.75E-04 9.48E-05
186 258864.3 4085106 1.30E-03 1.99E-04 1.07E-04
187 258863.5 4085081 1.38E-03 2.10E-04 1.13E-04
188 258862.8 4085056 1.46E-03 2.22E-04 1.20E-04
189 258862.1 4085031 1.54E-03 2.35E-04 1.27E-04
190 258861.4 4085007 1.64E-03 2.50E-04 1.35E-04
191 258860.6 4084982 1.74E-03 2.65E-04 1.43E-04
192 258859.9 4084957 1.85E-03 2.82E-04 1.53E-04
193 258859.2 4084932 1.97E-03 3.00E-04 1.62E-04
194 258858.5 4084907 2.09E-03 3.18E-04 1.72E-04
195 258955.8 4085125 l.OOE-03 1.53E-04 8.26E-05
196 258947.3 4085147 9.81E-04 1.49E-04 8.08E-05
197 258938.9 4085170 9.58E-04 1.46E-04 7.89E-05
198 258930.5 4085192 9.33E-04 1.42E-04 7.69E-05
199 258922.1 4085215 9.08E-04 1.38E-04 7.49E-05
200 258913.6 4085237 8.83E-04 1.34E-04 7.28E-05
201 258905.2 4085260 8.58E-04 1.31E-04 7.07E-05
202 258896.8 4085282 8.32E-04 1.27E-04 6.85E-05
203 258888.3 4085304 8.06E-04 1.23E-04 6.64E-05
204 258879.9 4085327 7.84E-04 1.19E-04 6.46E-05
205 258871.5 4085349 7.63E-04 1.16E-04 6.29E-05
206 258863 4085372 7.42E-04 1.13E-04 6.11E-05
207 258854.6 4085394 7.21E-04 l.lOE-04 5.94E-05
208 258846.2 4085416 7.01E-04 1.07E-04 5.78E-05
209 258837.7 4085439 6.82E-04 1.04E-04 5.62E-05
210 258829.3 4085461 6.63E-04 l.OlE-04 5.47E-05
211 258820.9 4085484 6.46E-04 9.84E-05 5.33E-05
212 258812.4 4085506 6.30E-04 9.60E-05 5.19E-05
213 258782.3 4085539 6.27E-04 9.54E-05 5.16E-05
214 258760.5 4085549 6.39E-04 9.73E-05 5.26E-05
215 258738.8 4085559 6.51E-04 9.92E-05 5.37E-05
216 258717.1 4085569 6.65E-04 l.OlE-04 5.49E-05
217 258695.3 4085579 6.81E-04 1.04E-04 5.62E-05
218 258673.6 4085589 6.99E-04 1.06E-04 5.76E-05
219 258651.9 4085599 7.18E-04 1.09E-04 5.92E-05
220 258630.1 4085609 7.38E-04 1.12E-04 6.08E-05
221 258608.4 4085619 7.57E-04 1.15E-04 6.24E-05
222 258586.6 4085629 7.75E-04 1.18E-04 6.39E-05
223 258564.9 4085639 7.93E-04 1.21E-04 6.53E-05
224 258543.2 4085649 8.08E-04 1.23E-04 6.66E-05
225 258521.4 4085659 8.20E-04 1.25E-04 6.76E-05
226 258499.7 4085669 8.38E-04 1.28E-04 6.91E-05
227 258478 4085679 8.54E-04 1.30E-04 7.04E-05
228 258456.2 4085689 8.70E-04 1.33E-04 7.17E-05
450
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
135 258636.3 4085402 l.llE-03 1.68E-04 9.11E-05
136 258615.1 4085412 1.14E-03 1.73E-04 9.38E-05
137 258594 4085422 1.17E-03 1.79E-04 9.67E-05
138 258572.8 4085432 1.21E-03 1.85E-04 9.99E-05
139 258551.6 4085441 1.25E-03 1.91E-04 1.03E-04
140 258530.4 4085451 1.29E-03 1.97E-04 1.07E-04
141 258509.2 4085461 1.33E-03 2.03E-04 l.lOE-04
142 258488.1 4085471 1.37E-03 2.08E-04 1.13E-04
143 258466.9 4085481 1.40E-03 2.14E-04 1.16E-04
144 258445.7 4085490 1.44E-03 2.19E-04 1.19E-04
145 258424.5 4085500 1.48E-03 2.25E-04 1.22E-04
146 258403.3 4085510 1.52E-03 2.31E-04 1.25E-04
147 258764.3 4085108 1.74E-03 2.66E-04 1.44E-04
148 258763.6 4085084 1.87E-03 2.84E-04 1.54E-04
149 258762.8 4085059 2.00E-03 3.05E-04 1.65E-04
150 258762.1 4085034 2.15E-03 3.28E-04 1.78E-04
151 258761.4 4085009 2.32E-03 3.53E-04 1.91E-04
152 258760.7 4084985 2.49E-03 3.79E-04 2.05E-04
153 258760 4084960 2.68E-03 4.08E-04 2.21E-04
154 258759.2 4084935 2.87E-03 4.37E-04 2.37E-04
155 258758.5 4084910 3.06E-03 4.67E-04 2.53E-04
156 258855.9 4085128 1.27E-03 1.94E-04 1.05E-04
157 258847.6 4085150 1.24E-03 1.89E-04 1.02E-04
158 258839.2 4085172 1.20E-03 1.83E-04 9.92E-05
159 258830.9 4085194 1.17E-03 1.78E-04 9.62E-05
160 258822.5 4085216 1.13E-03 1.72E-04 9.32E-05
161 258814.2 4085239 1.09E-03 1.67E-04 9.02E-05
162 258805.8 4085261 1.06E-03 1.61E-04 8.73E-05
163 258797.5 4085283 1.03E-03 1.56E-04 8.45E-05
164 258789.2 4085305 9.91E-04 1.51E-04 8.17E-05
165 258780.8 4085327 9.53E-04 1.45E-04 7.86E-05
166 258772.5 4085350 9.21E-04 1.40E-04 7.59E-05
167 258764.1 4085372 8.91E-04 1.36E-04 7.35E-05
168 258755.8 4085394 8.63E-04 1.31E-04 7.12E-05
169 258747.4 4085416 8,37E-04 1.27E-04 6.90E-05
170 258739.1 4085438 8.12E-04 1.24E-04 6.69E-05
171 258709.2 4085470 8.07E-04 1.23E-04 6.65E-05
172 258687.7 4085480 8.25E-04 1.26E-04 6.80E-05
173 258666.2 4085490 8.46E-04 1.29E-04 6.97E-05
174 258644.7 4085500 8.68E-04 1.32E-04 7.16E-05
175 258623.2 4085510 8.94E-04 1.36E-04 7.37E-05
176 258601.7 4085520 9.22E-04 1.40E-04 7.60E-05
177 258580.2 4085530 9.50E-04 1.45E-04 7.83E-05
178 258558.7 4085540 9.79E-04 1.49E-04 8.07E-05
179 258537.2 4085550 l.OlE-03 1.53E-04 8.29E-05
180 258515.7 4085560 1.03E-03 1.57E-04 8.47E-05
181 258494.1 4085570 1.05E-03 1.60E-04 8.65E-05
451
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
88 258613.6 4085088 3.42E-03 5.21E-04 2.82E-04
89 258612.9 4085063 3.81E-03 5.80E-04 3.14E-04
90 258612.2 4085039 4.24E-03 6.46E-04 3.50E-04
91 258611.5 4085014 4.71E-03 7.18E-04 3.89E-04
92 258610.7 4084989 5.20E-03 7.93E-04 4.29E-04
93 258610 4084964 5.69E-03 8.67E-04 4.69E-04
94 258609.3 4084940 6.15E-03 9.37E-04 5.07E-04
95 258608.6 4084915 6.54E-03 9.97E-04 5.39E-04
96 258656.3 4085133 2.39E-03 3.64E-04 1.97E-04
97 258648.3 4085154 2.29E-03 3.49E-04 1.89E-04
98 258640.3 4085175 2.19E-03 3.33E-04 1.80E-04
99 258632.3 4085197 2.08E-03 3.18E-04 1.72E-04
ICQ 258624.3 4085218 1.99E-03 3.02E-04 1.64E-04
101 258616.3 4085239 1.89E-03 2.88E-04 1.56E-04
102 258608.3 4085260 1.80E-03 2.74E-04 1.49E-04
103 258600.3 4085282 1.72E-03 2.62E-04 1.42E-04
104 258592.3 4085303 1.64E-03 2.50E-04 1.35E-04
105 258563.6 4085334 1.63E-03 2.48E-04 1.34E-04
106 258542.9 4085343 1.69E-03 2.57E-04 1.39E-04
107 258522.3 4085353 1.75E-03 2.67E-04 1.44E-04
108 258501.6 4085363 1.82E-03 2.77E-04 1.50E-04
109 258481 4085372 1.89E-03 2.88E-04 1.56E-04
110 258460.3 4085382 1.95E-03 2.97E-04 1.61E-04
111 258439.7 4085391 2.01E-03 3.07E-04 1.66E-04
112 258419 4085401 2.08E-03 3.17E-04 1.71E-04
113 258398.4 4085410 2.15E-03 3.27E-04 1.77E-04
114 258664.3 4085111 2.49E-03 3.80E-04 2.05E-04
115 258663.6 4085087 2.72E-03 4.15E-04 2.25E-04
116 258662.9 4085062 2.99E-03 4.55E-04 2.46E-04
117 258662.2 4085037 3.28E-03 4.99E-04 2.70E-04
118 258661.4 4085012 3.59E-03 5.47E-04 2.96E-04
119 258660.7 4084988 3.93E-03 5.99E-04 3.24E-04
120 258660 4084963 4.27E-03 6.51E-04 3.52E-04
121 258659.3 4084938 4.62E-03 7.03E-04 3.81E-04
122 258658.6 4084913 4.93E-03 7.52E-04 4.07E-04
123 258756.1 4085130 1.69E-03 2.57E-04 1.39E-04
124 258747.9 4085152 1.63E-03 2.49E-04 1.35E-04
125 258739.6 4085174 1.58E-03 2.40E-04 1.30E-04
126 258731.4 4085196 1.52E-03 2.32E-04 1.25E-04
127 258723.2 4085218 1.46E-03 2.23E-04 1.21E-04
128 258715 4085239 1.41E-03 2.14E-04 1.16E-04
129 258706.8 4085261 1.35E-03 2.06E-04 l.llE-04
130 258698.6 4085283 1.30E-03 1.98E-04 1.07E-04
131 258690.4 4085305 1.25E-03 1.90E-04 1.03E-04
132 258682.1 4085327 1.20E-03 1.82E-04 9.86E-05
133 258673.9 4085349 1.15E-03 1.76E-04 9.51E-05
134 258665.7 4085371 l.llE-03 1.69E-04 9.16E-05
452
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
41 258458.6 4084919 1.91E-02 2.91E-03 1.57E-03
42 258506.4 4085137 4.84E-03 7.37E-04 3.99E-04
43 258498.4 4085158 4.47E-03 6.81E-04 3.68E-04
44 258490.4 4085180 4.13E-03 6.29E-04 3.41E-04
45 258482.4 4085201 3.83E-03 5.84E-04 3.16E-04
46 258453.7 4085232 3.77E-03 5.75E-04 3.11E-04
47 258433.1 4085241 3.99E-03 6.09E-04 3.29E-04
48 258412.4 4085251 4.22E-03 6.43E-04 3.48E-04
49 258391.8 4085260 4.45E-03 6.77E-04 3.66E-04
SO 258514.4 4085116 5.23E-03 7.96E-04 4.31E-04
51 258513.7 4085091 6.12E-03 9.32E-04 5.05E-04
52 258513 4085066 7.19E-03 l.lOE-03 5.93E-04
53 258512.2 4085041 8.40E-03 1.28E-03 6.92E-04
54 258511.5 4085017 9.64E-03 1.47E-03 7.95E-04
55 258510.8 4084992 1.08E-02 1.64E-03 8.90E-04
56 258510.1 4084967 1.18E-02 1.79E-03 9.69E-04
57 258509.3 4084942 1.24E-02 1.90E-03 1.03E-03
58 258508.6 4084918 1.28E-02 1.95E-03 1.05E-03
59 258556.8 4085135 3.71E-03 5.65E-04 3.05E-04
60 258541.5 4085175 3.28E-03 5.00E-04 2.70E-04
61 258526.2 4085216 2.90E-03 4.42E-04 2.39E-04
62 258491.3 4085265 2.71E-03 4.12E-04 2.23E-04
63 258452 4085284 2.96E-03 4.52E-04 2.44E-04
64 258412.6 4085302 3.23E-03 4.92E-04 2.66E-04
65 258563.7 4085090 4.45E-03 6.79E-04 3.67E-04
66 258562.9 4085065 5.07E-03 7.72E-04 4.18E-04
67 258562.2 4085040 5.76E-03 8.78E-04 4.75E-04
68 258561.5 4085015 6.50E-03 9.91E-04 5.36E-04
69 258560.8 4084990 7.25E-03 l.lOE-03 5.97E-04
70 258560 4084966 7.94E-03 1.21E-03 6.55E-04
71 258559.3 4084941 8.54E-03 1.30E-03 7.04E-04
72 258558.6 4084916 8.97E-03 1.37E-03 7.40E-04
73 258606 4085135 2.93E-03 4.46E-04 2.41E-04
74 258597.7 4085157 2.77E-03 4.22E-04 2.28E-04
75 258589.3 4085179 2.62E-03 3.99E-04 2.16E-04
76 258581 4085202 2.47E-03 3.76E-04 2.04E-04
77 258572.6 4085224 2.33E-03 3.55E-04 1.92E-04
78 258564.3 4085246 2.20E-03 3.36E-04 1.82E-04
79 258556 4085268 2.08E-03 3.18E-04 1.72E-04
80 258526.1 4085300 2.06E-03 3.14E-04 1.70E-04
81 258504.6 4085310 2.15E-03 3.28E-04 1.78E-04
82 258483.1 4085320 2.25E-03 3.43E-04 1.86E-04
83 258461.6 4085330 2.35E-03 3.58E-04 1.94E-04
84 258440.1 4085340 2.44E-03 3.72E-04 2.02E-04
85 258418.5 4085350 2.54E-03 3.87E-04 2.09E-04
86 258397 4085360 2.64E-03 4.02E-04 2.17E-04
87 258614.4 4085113 3.08E-03 4.69E-04 2.54E-04
453
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
2007
.IQIO) ilniilf
MaxYr 2 4.89E-02 7.45E-03 4.03E-03
Row 33 T2 T2L3 T4f
Col 3 4 5
Adjustment 100% 15% 8%
Year 2 Year 2 Year 2
1 258389.5 4085119 1.73E-02 2.63E-03 1.42E-03
2 258388.7 4085095 2.75E-02 4.19E-03 2.27E-03
3 258388 4085070 3.82E-02 5.81E-03 3.15E-03
4 258387.3 4085045 4.49E-02 6.84E-03 3.70E-03
5 258386.6 4085020 4.88E-02 7.43E-03 4.02E-03
6 258385.8 4084996 5.06E-02 7.71E-03 4.17E-03
7 258385.1 4084971 5.06E-02 7.71E-03 4.17E-03
8 258384.4 4084946 4.86E-02 7.40E-03 4.00E-03
9 258383.7 4084921 4.19E-02 6.38E-03 3.45E-03
10 258407.8 4085136 1.06E-02 1.62E-03 8.76E-04
11 258383.9 4085162 1.03E-02 1.56E-03 8.46E-04
12 258413.7 4085094 1.70E-02 2.58E-03 1.40E-03
13 258413 4085069 2.28E-02 3.47E-03 1.88E-03
14 258412.3 4085044 2.77E-02 4.22E-03 2.28E-03
15 258411.6 4085020 3.12E-02 4.76E-03 2.57E-03
16 258410.8 4084995 3.33E-02 5.08E-03 2.75E-03
17 258410.1 4084970 3.42E-02 5.20E-03 2.82E-03
18 258409.4 4084945 3.35E-02 5.10E-03 2.76E-03
19 258408.7 4084921 3.11E-02 4.73E-03 2.56E-03
20 258432.8 4085136 8.37E-03 1.28E-03 6.90E-04
21 258402.2 4085179 7.38E-03 1.12E-03 6.08E-04
22 258438.7 4085093 1.20E-02 1.83E-03 9.91E-04
23 258438 4085068 1.54E-02 2.35E-03 1.27E-03
24 258437.3 4085044 1.89E-02 2.87E-03 1.55E-03
25 258436.5 4085019 2.17E-02 3.30E-03 1.79E-03
26 258435.8 4084994 2.37E-02 3.61E-03 1.95E-03
27 258435.1 4084969 2.48E-02 3.78E-03 2.04E-03
28 258434.4 4084945 2.49E-02 3.80E-03 2.06E-03
29 258433.7 4084920 2.41E-02 3.67E-03 1.99E-03
30 258457.7 4085135 6.83E-03 1.04E-03 5.63E-04
31 258444.4 4085170 5.78E-03 8.80E-04 4.76E-04
32 258420.5 4085196 5.67E-03 8.64E-04 4.67E-04
33 258386.1 4085212 6.37E-03 9.70E-04 5.25E-04
34 258463.7 4085092 9.21E-03 1.40E-03 7.59E-04
35 258463 4085068 1.14E-02 1.74E-03 9.40E-04
36 258462.3 4085043 1.37E-02 2.09E-03 1.13E-03
37 258461.5 4085018 1.59E-02 2.43E-03 1.31E-03
38 258460.8 4084993 1.77E-02 2.69E-03 1.46E-03
39 258460.1 4084969 1.88E-02 2.87E-03 1.55E-03
40 258459.4 4084944 1.93E-02 2.94E-03 1.59E-03
454
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.
2937 256S26J8 4086214.85 1.03E-05 187E-04 1.166-04 1.166-04 6.456-05 2938 256516J3 4086193.03 l.lOE-05 U9E-04 1.176-04 1.176-04 6.556-05 2939 256506.29 4086171.21 1.12E-05 1.6tE-04 1.196-04 1.196-04 6.646-05 2940 256496.24 4086149.39 1.13E-0S 1.64E-04 1.216-04 1.216-04 6.726-05 2941 256486.19 4086127.57 1.14E-05 18SE-04 1.226-04 1.226-04 6.796-05 2942 256476.14 4086105.75 1.15E-05 1.67E-04 1.236-04 1.236-04 6.866-05 2943 256466.1 4086083.93 1.16E-05 1.6SE-04 1.246-04 1.246-04 6.916-05 2944 256456.05 4086062.11 1.17E-05 1.69E-04 1.246-04 1.246-04 6.946-05 294S 256446 4086040.29 1.17E-0S 1.696-04 1.256-04 1.256-04 6.956-05 2946 256435.95 4086018.47 1.17E-05 189E-04 1.256-04 1.256-04 6.946-05 2947 256425.91 4085996.65 1.16E-0S 1.6SE-04 1.246-04 1.246-04 6.916-05 2948 256415.86 4085974.83 1.15E-05 187E-04 1.236-04 1.236-04 6.866-05 2949 25640561 4085953.01 1.14E-05 185E-04 1.226-04 1.226-04 6.786-05 29S0 256395.76 4085931.19 1.12E-05 183E-04 1.206-04 1.206-04 6.6SE-OS 2951 256385.71 4085909.37 l.lOE-05 189E-04 1.186-04 1.186-04 6.556-05 2952 256375.67 4085887.55 l.OSE-05 186E-04 1.156-04 1.156-04 6.40E-05 2953 256365.62 4085865.73 1.05E-05 182E-04 1.126-04 1.126-04 6.246-05 2954 256355.57 4085843.91 l.OlE-05 1.47E-04 1.086-04 1.086-04 6.036-05 29SS 256345.52 4085822.09 9.7SE-06 1.41E-04 1.046-04 1.046-04 5.816-05 2956 256335.48 4085800.27 9.37E-06 186E-04 9.996-05 9.996-05 5.576-05 2957 256325.43 4085778.45 8.95E-06 1.296-04 9.546-05 9.546-05 5.326-05 2958 256315.38 4085756.63 a.51E-06 1.23E-04 9.086-05 9.086-05 5.066-05 2959 256305.33 4085734.81 8.07E-06 1.17E-04 8606-05 8.606-05 4.806-05 2960 256295.29 4085712.99 7.64E-06 l.lOE-04 8.146-05 8.146-05 4.546-05 2961 256285.24 4085691.17 7.22E-06 1.04E-04 7.706-05 7.706-05 4.296-05 2962 256275.19 4085669.35 6.81E-06 9856-05 7.266-05 7.266-05 4.056-05 2963 256265.14 4085647.53 6.44E-06 9J1E-05 6876-05 6.876-05 3.836-05 2964 256255.09 4085625.71 6.10E-06 8836-05 6816-05 6.516-05 3.636-05 2965 256245.05 408560369 S80E-06 8396-05 6.196-05 6.196-05 3.456-05 2966 256235 4085582.07 5.54E-06 8.026-05 5916-05 5916-05 3.296-05 2967 256224.95 4085560.26 S.32E-06 7.70E-05 5.686-05 5.686-05 3.166-05 2968 256214.9 408553864 5.14E-06 783E-05 5.486-05 5.486-05 3.056-05 2969 25620466 4085516.62 489E-06 7.21E-05 5316-05 5316-05 2.966-05 2970 256194.81 40854946 486E-06 702E-05 5.186-05 5.186-05 2.896-05 2971 256184.76 4085472.98 4.75E-06 687E-05 5.066-05 5.066-05 2.826-05 2972 256174.71 4085451.16 4.65E-06 6.72E-05 4.966-05 4.966-05 2.766-05 2973 256164.67 4085429.34 486E-06 6.606-05 4866-05 4.866-05 2.716-05 2974 256154.62 4085407.52 4.4SE-06 6.476-05 4.776-05 4.776-05 2.666-05 2975 256144.57 4085385.7 4.39E-06 6.3SE-OS 4.686-05 4.686-05 2.616-05 2976 256134.52 4085363.88 480E-06 6.22E-05 4896-05 4896-05 2.566-05 2977 256124.47 4085342.06 4.22E-06 6.106-05 4.506-05 4806-05 2.516-05 2978 256114.43 4085320.24 4.13E-06 5.976-05 4.406-05 4.406-05 2.466-05 2979 256104.38 4085298.42 4.05E-06 5866-05 4.326-05 4.326-05 2.416-05 2980 25609463 40852766 3.98E-06 5.756-05 4.246-05 4346-05 2.366-05 2981 256084.28 4085254.78 3.91E-06 5.656-05 4.166-05 4.166-05 2.326-05 2982 256074.24 4085232.96 3.85E-06 5.566-05 4.106-05 4.106-05 2.296-05 2983 25762963 4086654.U 7.14E-06 1.036-04 7.616-05 7.616-05 4.246-05 2984 257653.81 408665366 7.07E-0G 1O2E-04 7846-05 7846-05 4.206-05 2985 257678.09 408665168 7.01E-06 1.016-04 7.476-05 7.476-05 4.176-05 2986 257702.38 4086650.9 6.95E-06 1.016-04 7.416-05 7.416-05 4.136-05 2987 257726.66 4086649.83 6.89E-06 9.976-05 7.356-05 7.356-05 4.106-05 2988 257750.94 4086648.75 6.83E-06 9.886-05 7.296-05 7.296-05 4.066-05 2989 257775.22 4086647.68 6.77E-06 9.806-05 7.226-05 7.226-05 4.036-05 2990 257799.5 4086646.6 6.71E-06 9.716-05 7.166-05 7.166-05 3.99E-05 2991 257823.79 4086645.53 6.65E-06 9.616-05 7.096-05 7.096-05 3.956-05 2992 257848.07 4086644.45 6.58E-06 9.516-05 7.016-05 7.016-05 3916-05 2993 257872.35 4086643.38 6.50E-06 9.406-05 6.936-05 6.936-05 3866-05 2994 257896.63 4086642.3 6.41E-06 9.276-05 6.846-05 6.846-05 3816-05 2995 257920.91 403664U3 6.32E-06 9.146-05 6.746-05 6.746-05 3.766-05 2996 257945.19 4086640.15 6.22E-06 8996-05 6.636-05 6.636-05 3.706-05 2997 257969.48 4036639.07 6.11E-06 8846-05 6.526-05 6.526-05 3.636-05 2998 257993.76 4086638 6.00E-06 8686-05 6.406-05 6.406-05 3.576-05 2999 258018.04 4086636.92 5.88E-06 8516-05 6.276-05 6.276-05 3.506-05 3000 258042.32 408663585 5.76E-06 8336-05 6.146-05 6.146-05 3826-05 3001 258066.6 4086634.77 5.64E-06 8166-05 6.016-05 6.016-05 3.356-05 3002 25809069 4086633.7 5.52E-06 7986-05 5.886-05 5.886-05 3.286-05 3003 258115.17 4086632.62 5.40E-06 7826-05 5.766-05 5.766-05 3.216-05 3004 258139.45 4086631.55 5.2SE-06 7.666-05 5.646-05 5.646-05 3.156-05 3005 258163.73 4086630.47 5.19E46 7816-05 5.S3EOS 5.536-05 3.086-05 3006 258188.01 4086629.4 5.10E-06 7.376-05 5.436-05 5836-05 3.036-05 3007 258212.29 4086628.32 5.01E-06 7.246-05 5.34E05 5.346-05 2.986-05 3008 258236.58 4086627.24 4.93E-06 7.126-05 5.256-05 5.256-05 2.936-05 3009 258260.86 4086626.17 4.85E-06 7.016-05 5.176-05 5.176-05 2.886-05 3010 258285.14 4086625.09 4.77E-06 6.916-05 5.096-05 5.09E-O5 2.846-05 3011 258309.42 4086624.02 4.70E-06 6.806-05 5.016-05 5.016-05 2.796-05 30U 258333.7 4086622.94 4.63E-06 6.706-05 4.946-05 4.946-05 2.756-05 3013 258357.99 408662187 4.56E-06 6606-05 4.866-05 4866-05 2.716-05 3014 258382.27 4086620.79 483E-06 6806-05 4.796-05 4.796-05 2.676-05 3015 25840665 4086619.72 4.42E-06 6406-05 4.726-05 4.726-05 2.636-05 3016 25843063 4086618.64 4.35E-06 6306-05 4.646-05 4846-05 2896-05 i.esE-oe