Agenda packet — Coachella City Council, September 13, 2023 (part 5 of 6)

Item 27.

Sites Inventory and Methodology City of Coachella | B-9 sites in the inventory were located within a Specific Plan Area, the buildout estimate from the Specific Plan was utilized as the realistic capacity. Some Specific Plan areas, such as La Entrada Specific Plan, require significant investment of new and extended infrastructure. While these areas are developable, the City focused accommodation of RHNA on sites that have current access to infrastructure and did not include this Specific Plan in the sites inventory.

Site Selection Criteria
Since Coachella has a large amount of vacant land, the City selected sites that met the following criteria:
• Currently vacant
• Residential use is allowed under zoning and/or General Plan regulations • Is not on tribal land
• Not zoned agriculture reserve or agricultural transition Income Categorization
Eligible parcels were assessed to determine which income levels they can accommodate. Each parcel was determined to be able to accommodate a specific income category given its maximum allowable density standards. The lower income category threshold is consistent with the default density for Coachella pursuant to Government Code §65583.2.

Table B-6: Income Levels by Density
Density Income Level
< 20 dwelling units/acre Above moderate
20 – 29 dwelling units/acre Moderate
30+ dwelling units/acre Lower
Source: LWC, HCD
Per HCD guidance, sites accommodating lower-income housing should be between 0.5 and 10 acres and accommodate at least 16 units on a site. All sites originally considered lower income but whose lot sizes are smaller than 0.5 or larger than 10 acres, or do not accommodate at least 16 units, were categorized for moderate or above moderate housing.

Capacity Scenarios
As discussed above, two-scenarios were performed for the sites inventory. For each scenario, maximum and realistic unit capacity was calculated for parcels that meet all criteria previously mentioned. Maximum unit capacity was calculated by multiplying the area of a parcel by maximum density in dwelling units per acre (DU/AC). Realistic capacity is calculated by multiplying the area of each parcel by the realistic density for each zone or General Plan designation, shown in Table B-5. The following two sections explains the results for each scenario in greater detail.

Page 616 ends

Item 27.

B-10 | City of Coachella Sites Inventory and Methodology Scenario #1: Existing Zoning Capacity
Since the General Plan designations have not been fully implemented, there are only a select number of zones that have been rezoned to accommodate 30 or more units per acre (default density for lower income housing established by State law). Developable sites identified under the current zoning are only presumed to be feasible for moderate and above-moderate income housing.

Under existing zoning, a total of 175 parcels accommodates a total of 5,423 units for moderate and above moderate-income housing, resulting in a shortfall of 1,759 low-income units and 441 above moderate-income units and (taking into account pipeline projects) a surplus of 845 units for moderate-income households. See Table B-9 to see a summary of these results. Because this scenario was known to result in a shortfall of sites, and a rezoning program will be needed to accommodate the complete RHNA, further site-by-site analysis was not performed. The City will rely on Scenario #2, below.

Scenario #2: General Plan Potential Capacity
Coachella updated its General Plan in 2015, which established new place-based land use designations. The new land use designations significantly open more of the City to residential development at a variety of densities, up to 65 units per acre, increasing the city’s capacity for development. Since adoption, the City has not comprehensively updated the Zoning Code to ensure regulations are consistent with the General Plan, but the City has performed targeted zoning amendments to increase capacity.

To understand the potential capacity under the General Plan when rezoning is completed, a second site inventory was conducted using the General Plan land use and maximum and realistic density assumptions in Tables B-4 and B-5, respectively. Since the Zoning Code has not been updated, there are only a few examples of projects developed under the increased density allowances. To ensure a conservative unit estimate, the City assumes projects will generally build at minimum densities, or a reduced percentage of the average density. For areas targeted for mixed-use, such as the Downtown Center and Urban Employment Center, the City assumes residential comes in at 50 percent capacity, or in the Neighborhood Center at the low end of the density range at 15 units per acre. This is below the densities of recently approved affordable projects, including Pueblo Viejo Villas and Coachella Valley Apartments, two affordable projects described above. This scenario results in a shortfall of sites, without zoning regulations in place at the beginning of the planning period (October 15, 2021). As a result, the City proposes Programs 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 which commits the City to rezoning to implement this scenario, prioritize rezoning the lower income sites in accordance with Government Code Section 65583.2, specifically requirements of subdivisions (h) and (i), require residential use occupy 50 percent of the total floor area of a mixed-use project on mixed-use sites identified for lower income development, and to amend the General Plan to allow 100% residential in certain circumstances, respectively. Additionally, this scenario includes the addition of four City-owned sites adjacent to Downtown along Grapefruit Boulevard that are currently identified as Industrial in the General

Page 617 ends

Item 27.

Sites Inventory and Methodology City of Coachella | B-11 Plan. The City has submitted a TCC grant application to develop these sites for affordable housing, and has committed to amending the General Plan to designate these properties as Urban Employment, which allows up to 65 units per acre. (See Program 1.13 for the required General Plan map amendment)
Initial results identified several hundred parcels eligible for residential development, with over 30,000 potential units possible, far exceeding the RHNA at all income levels. Additional screening was performed to focus in on the most eligible and feasible development sites.

Site-by-Site Assessment
To ensure sites selected through the screening analysis are viable for development within the planning period, the City reviewed selected sites for existing conditions (e.g., environmental constraints, lack of infrastructure, ownership, built structures, etc.) that may preclude them from the site inventory. The City also compared the site inventory results to pipeline projects, 5th Cycle sites, and sites currently being rezoned. The analysis included a site-by-site assessment and refinement of sites depending on additional information from direct observation or firsthand experience from City staff. A select number of sites were removed, including those classified as vacant but contain built structures and large undeveloped sites to the north and east of the City not currently connected to city infrastructure. Sites that were originally screened out of the results because they were zoned for manufacturing or in agricultural operations were added back in if they are located adjacent to existing non-manufacturing development (e.g., near Downtown), or they are in process of being rezoned to a residential zone (such as the sites being rezoned to fulfill the 5th Cycle shortfall), or have the potential to redevelop in the planning period. Sites included in the 5th Cycle inventory were updated, as needed, to ensure the right zone assumption and site acreage were reflected in the 6th Cycle inventory. The final General Plan scenario results are provided in Table B-9.

B.2.6 Suitability of Nonvacant Sites
While the City of Coachella has large areas of vacant land that are planned for, and allow, residential development, most of the land east of State Highway 86 and much of the area north of 48th Avenue are not connected to water and sewer lines and are less likely to develop in the next 8 years without significant cost to extend infrastructure. The City has prioritized identification of sites that have existing infrastructure connections and are likely to develop or redevelop in the planning period. Therefore, the City’s Housing Element includes nonvacant sites. The City has adequate vacant sites for lower income housing and does not rely on nonvacant sites to accommodate any of the City’s lower income RHNA; however, the sites inventory identifies additional nonvacant sites for lower income to demonstrate the City’s excess capacity for housing development. The site inventory also identifies larger nonvacant sites to accommodate a portion of the City’s above moderate income RHNA. The City conducted an analysis to determine if substantial evidence exists to support the premise that housing can be accommodated on these

Page 618 ends

Item 27.

B-12 | City of Coachella Sites Inventory and Methodology sites and/or existing uses on these sites will be discontinued during the planning period (2021- 2029).

Nonvacant low income parcels include properties 1 to 8 acres in size with General Plan designations that promote residential mixed-use or multi-family residential development at densities up to 65 units per acre. These sites are mostly developed with commercial uses, with a couple sites used for agricultural production. The above moderate income sites are mostly used for a variety of agricultural operations and do not meet the density or site size thresholds to be considered suitable for lower income development. While agricultural production remains an important part of the Coachella Valley, and the City of Coachella, the City’s General Plan envisions these areas to transition to residential uses.

Screening nonvacant sites for potential inclusion in the site inventory included consideration of regional development trends recent and on-going City actions to rezone agricultural sites to residential zones with the support of the property owners, and utilized conservative assumptions in projecting units.

Table B-7 provides an overview of the 8 nonvacant sites that are included in the site inventory for lower income housing (Note: the City has adequate vacant land to fulfill the RHNA requirement for low income). As indicated in Table B-7, all of the sites are proposed to allow 25 to 65 dwelling units per acre.

The sites listed below have a wide variety of uses including agricultural land with accessory buildings, strip malls, a tire shop, a grocery store, a restaurant, and surface parking.

In addition to the sites identified or lower income housing, the City is also analyzing the suitability of redeveloping agricultural sites for above moderate income housing. The sites have been included because of the opportunity for housing development on sites near existing residential, public facility, and commercial uses and amenities, and that have access to water and sewer infrastructure.

Page 619 ends

Item 27.

Sites Inventory and Methodology City of Coachella | B-13 Table B-7: Existing Uses on Lower Income Sites
APN Address Zone General
Plan
Density
(du/ac)
Site Size
(acres)
Existing Use
Lower
Income
Unit
Capacity
603281044 C-G NC 40 0.71 Commercial- strip mall and
surface parking 11
603281053 C-G NC 40 8.13 Commercial- strip mall and
surface parking 122
767140002 C-G GN 25 9.46 Agriculture – unimproved
land 95
767140002 R-M NC 40 9.64 Agriculture with accessory
warehouses 145
603310021 C-G DC 65 0.67
Retail/Commercialfreestanding restaurant and
surface parking
11 603310017 C-G DC 65 1.38 Retail/Commercial- surface
parking lot 22
603310024 C-G DC 65 2.66 Retail/Commercial- grocery
store and surface parking 43
603310026 C-G DC 65 0.74 Retail/Commercial- tire shop
and surface parking 12
Total 461
Source: City of Coachella, LWC
Development trends in the Coachella Valley and eastern Riverside and Imperial demonstrate the redevelopment of underutilized nonvacant commercial properties, agricultural land, and even vacant commercially zoned infill properties into multi-family and residential mixed-use projects.

For instance, in Palm Springs, the 64 @ the Riv housing development completed in 2022 (containing a vacant restaurant, tennis courts, and surface parking) produced 64 units on 5.22 acres for a density of 12 dwelling units per acre. In addition, a commercially zoned property in the Palm Springs Downtown Specific Plan previously approved for a 142-room hotel instead is being developed into an infill mixed-use building including 45 residential units on 0.84 acres for a density of 54 units per acre. In El Centro, to the south, 288 units are proposed on 12.9 acres for a density of 22 units per acre on vacant infill commercial land; per Table B-3, Coachella itself is experiencing affordable residential mixed-use infill development on vacant commercially zoned property in its downtown. Projects like these indicate demand in the Coachella Valley for denser infill multi-family and residential mixed-use development in existing downtowns and commercial corridors; not merely demand for development on vacant land along the peripheries of its communities. These projects also indicate that there may be communities in the Coachella Valley that have a surplus of commercial land that could be converted to meet this residential demand.

Of course, however, demand for the conversion of agricultural land to multi-family housing exists in the Coachella Valley as well. 10 miles south of Coachella, in the unincorporated Riverside

Page 620 ends

Item 27.

B-14 | City of Coachella Sites Inventory and Methodology County community of Oasis, the County is processing a mixed-use affordable housing development to construct 160 units agricultural land on 26 acres for a density of 6 units per acre.

Table B-8 identifies four recently developed, planned, and/or proposed residential projects in the Coachella Valley. As stated above, one of these projects is being constructed on a large agricultural site surrounded by existing development, which is similar to conditions in Coachella.

The size of the sites ranges from 1 to 26 acres and the existing uses include agricultural and commercial. By-right densities range from about 25 to over 50 dwelling units per acre. Several of the projects in Table B-8 are within the range proposed by the City (see Table B-7, above).

Table B-8: Residential Development on Nonvacant or Commercially Zoned Sites in the Coachella Valley City/Community Address Site
Size (ac)
Previous
Use
Final
Unit
Count
Number of
Affordable
Units
By-Right
Density
(du/ac)
Density
Bonus?
Y/N
Year
Completed
/Status
Calculation
of Built
Density
(du/ac)
El Centro
Northeast
corner of
6 th Street
and Spear
Avenue

12.9 Vacant,
Commerci
ally Zoned
288 0 25 N
Under
review 22
Palm
Springs
2000 N.

Indian
Canyon
Drive

5.22 Restauran
t, tennis
courts,
and
parking
64 0 30 N
Building
permit
issued
2017;
recently
completed
12 Palm
Springs
Northeast
corner of
Belardo
Road and
Museum
Way

0.84 Vacant,
current
entitlemen
t for 142-
room
hotel
45 0 - N
Approved
2021; in
plan check
54 Oasis
(Unincorp
orated
communit
y in the
Coachella
Valley)
Southeast
corner of
66th
Avenue
and
Middleton
Street
26 Agricultur
e
160 160 - N
Under
review 6

Page 621 ends

Item 27.

Sites Inventory and Methodology City of Coachella | B-15 To encourage the redevelopment of nonvacant sites with higher-density residential uses, including housing affordable to lower incomes, the City has multiple programs to facilitate more intensive residential development. These include, but aren’t limited to:
• Program 1.1: General Plan Implementation
• Program 1.2: Lower Income Site Rezoning
• Program 1.3: General Plan Amendment
• Program 1.7: Large Sites
• Program 1.13: General Plan Amendment for Certain City-Owned Sites • Program 5.1: Zoning Code Constraints
• Program 5.3: Parking Requirements
• Program 6.4 Density Bonus
• Program 6.7: Streamlined Approvals
As described above, many of the nonvacant housing sites identified in the City have underperforming uses and/or excess capacity. Based on recent development trends and proactive efforts on the part of the City to encourage redevelopment of nonvacant sites, these sites are likely to provide much need housing in the City of Coachella.

Section B.3 Adequacy of Residential Sites in Meeting
RHNA
B.3.1 Summary
The following table summarizes the City’s methods for satisfying its RHNA (Table B-9). Taking into account projects in the pipeline, the City has a remaining RHNA of 6,778 units. Development capacity based on existing zoning is 5,423 units, with shortfalls in the lower income and above moderate-income categories. Capacity under General Plan designations is estimated at a realistic 10,003 units with a surplus of 3,225 units above the RHNA. The City commits to amending the Zoning Code and General Plan within three years to fully implement the updated General Plan designations, as outlined in Scenario #2. (see Program 1.1)

Page 622 ends

Item 27.

B-16 | City of Coachella Sites Inventory and Methodology Table B-9: Residential Development Potential and RHNA
Extremely-Low, Very Low
and Low
Moderate
Above
Moderate
Total
RHNA 2,032 1,367 4,487 7,886
Entitled/Proposed
Projects1 273 835 1,108
Remaining RHNA 1,759 1,367 3,652 6,778
Site Inventory Results
Scenario 1 – Existing
Capacity (Zoning Code) 2,212 3,211 5,423
Remaining RHNA- Zoning
Scenario 1,759 -8452 441
Scenario 2 – Potential
Capacity (General Plan)3 2,345 1,468 6,190 10,003
Remaining RHNAGeneral Plan Scenario -5862
-1012-2,5382-3,2252
1 Considers net new units only.
2 Negative value indicates a surplus of housing capacity. 3 Requires rezoning, see Programs 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3.

Source: City of Coachella, LWC 2021
B.3.2 Housing Sites Map
The following maps, Figures B-1 and B-2, show the inventory of adequate sites by income category for each scenario.

Page 623 ends

Item 27.

Sites Inventory and Methodology City of Coachella | B-17 Figure B-1: 6th Cycle Housing Element Site Inventory Map by Income Category for Zoning Scenario

Page 624 ends

Item 27.

B-18 | City of Coachella Sites Inventory and Methodology Figure B-2: 6th Cycle Housing Element Site Inventory Map by Income Category for the General Plan Scenario

Page 625 ends

Item 27.

Sites Inventory and Methodology City of Coachella | B-19 B.3.3 Housing Sites Table
The following tables list the parcels in the City’s housing sites inventory with unit capacity by income category.

Page 626 ends

Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
Zoning scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN Existing Land
Use Zoning Site Size
(Acres)
Max Density
(du/ac)
Max Capacity
(units)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category
601390029 VACANT R-E 2.76 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
601390025 VACANT R-E 10.42 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
601390014 VACANT R-E 1.97 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
601390006 VACANT R-E 35.08 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
601400001 VACANT R-S 19.70 6 118 95 Above Moderate
601400002 VACANT R-E 18.61 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603130001 VACANT C-N 2.07 8 17 13 Above Moderate
603130003 VACANT R-S 15.19 6 91 73 Above Moderate
603130005 VACANT A-T 0.11 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603130006 VACANT A-T 3.31 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603102010 VACANT R-S 47.28 6 284 227 Above Moderate
603102018 VACANT R-S 13.05 6 78 63 Above Moderate
603130015 VACANT A-T 0.55 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603130009 VACANT R-S 10.00 6 60 48 Above Moderate
603110012 VACANT R-S 32.84 6 197 158 Above Moderate
603110012 VACANT R-S 21.35 6 128 102 Above Moderate
603110012 VACANT R-S 9.73 6 58 47 Above Moderate
603241005 VACANT R-S 1.34 6 8 6 Above Moderate
603250009 VACANT R-S 0.46 6 3 2 Above Moderate
603250010 VACANT R-S 0.46 6 3 2 Above Moderate
603350002 VACANT A-R 40.18 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603350014 VACANT A-R 9.83 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603350015 VACANT A-R 7.29 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603350017 VACANT A-R 9.43 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603455008 VACANT R-S 0.64 6 4 3 Above Moderate
603350003 VACANT A-R 38.08 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603455024 VACANT R-S 0.53 6 3 3 Above Moderate
603330008 VACANT A-R 9.91 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603330007 VACANT A-R 9.77 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603330006 VACANT A-R 9.80 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603330005 VACANT A-R 9.95 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
603490022 VACANT R-O-6000 0.24 7 2 1 Above Moderate
612280018 VACANT R-S 20.27 6 122 97 Above Moderate
763020005 VACANT A-R 4.53 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763070013 VACANT R-S 66.87 6 401 321 Above Moderate
763070002 VACANT R-S 74.05 6 444 355 Above Moderate
763020020 VACANT A-R 2.84 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765450008 VACANT R-E 3.22 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update

Page 627 ends

Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
Zoning scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN Existing Land
Use Zoning Site Size
(Acres)
Max Density
(du/ac)
Max Capacity
(units)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category
765450018 VACANT R-E 3.20 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765450017 VACANT R-E 3.19 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765230005 VACANT R-E 1.55 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763090008 VACANT A-T 70.14 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765450007 VACANT R-E 2.39 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763020028 VACANT A-R 4.82 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763020007 VACANT A-R 10.29 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765450002 VACANT R-S 17.85 6 107 86 Above Moderate
765704001 VACANT R-O-6000 1.14 7 8 6 Above Moderate
763020008 VACANT A-R 10.52 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765251013 VACANT R-S 0.17 6 1 1 Above Moderate
763070006 VACANT R-S 41.04 6 246 197 Above Moderate
763020017 VACANT A-R 1.15 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763020016 VACANT A-R 2.19 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765460001 VACANT R-S 10.07 6 60 48 Above Moderate
763020015 VACANT A-R 1.27 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765253007 VACANT R-S 0.14 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765253009 VACANT R-S 0.21 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765255013 VACANT R-S 0.16 6 1 1 Above Moderate
763020011 VACANT A-R 4.79 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765256007 VACANT R-S 0.10 6 1 1 Above Moderate
763020012 VACANT A-R 4.92 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765283013 VACANT R-S 0.15 6 1 1 Above Moderate
763020013 VACANT A-R 5.02 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763100006 VACANT A-T 20.74 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763100011 VACANT A-T 20.51 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765623019 VACANT R-S 0.14 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765623020 VACANT R-S 0.14 6 1 1 Above Moderate
763060040 VACANT A-R 27.38 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763060008 VACANT R-S 34.78 6 209 167 Above Moderate
763080028 VACANT R-S 2.22 6 13 11 Above Moderate
763080003 VACANT R-S 59.70 6 358 287 Above Moderate
763100019 VACANT A-T 16.55 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763080030 VACANT R-S 31.90 6 191 153 Above Moderate
763100018 VACANT A-T 3.48 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765070009 VACANT R-S 0.57 6 3 3 Above Moderate
765275006 VACANT R-S 0.18 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765275007 VACANT R-S 0.10 6 1 1 Above Moderate
City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update

Page 628 ends

Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
Zoning scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN Existing Land
Use Zoning Site Size
(Acres)
Max Density
(du/ac)
Max Capacity
(units)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category
765276022 VACANT R-S 0.17 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765070010 VACANT R-S 0.65 6 4 3 Above Moderate
765070007 VACANT R-S 0.64 6 4 3 Above Moderate
765070004 VACANT R-S 0.66 6 4 3 Above Moderate
763080017 VACANT A-T 7.45 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765275011 VACANT R-S 0.09 6 1 1 Above Moderate
763080017 VACANT R-S 0.51 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765070005 VACANT R-S 0.67 6 4 3 Above Moderate
765070008 VACANT R-S 0.65 6 4 3 Above Moderate
765070011 VACANT R-S 0.66 6 4 3 Above Moderate
763080007 VACANT A-T 9.72 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765295002 VACANT R-S 0.16 6 1 1 Above Moderate
763080008 VACANT A-T 9.66 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763422025 VACANT R-O-6000 0.16 7 1 1 Above Moderate
763100007 VACANT A-T 16.89 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763100016 VACANT A-T 19.71 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763080018 VACANT R-S 18.61 6 112 89 Above Moderate
763080009 VACANT A-T 4.91 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763080016 VACANT A-T 7.49 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763080012 VACANT A-T 3.19 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
763120002 VACANT A-T 6.30 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765084001 VACANT R-S 0.19 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765083010 VACANT R-S 0.21 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765083004 VACANT R-S 0.17 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765083005 VACANT R-S 0.20 6 1 1 Above Moderate
763412030 VACANT R-O-6000 0.15 7 1 1 Above Moderate
763080015 VACANT A-T 5.08 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765083003 VACANT R-S 0.17 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765083009 VACANT R-S 0.22 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765083006 VACANT R-S 0.22 6 1 1 Above Moderate
763080010 VACANT A-T 2.54 1/lot 1 1 Above Moderate
765083008 VACANT R-S 0.26 6 2 1 Above Moderate
765083007 VACANT R-S 0.25 6 2 1 Above Moderate
765361001 VACANT R-S 0.12 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765115001 VACANT R-S 0.27 6 2 1 Above Moderate
763421037 VACANT R-O-6000 0.14 7 1 1 Above Moderate
765111013 VACANT R-S 0.21 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765115003 VACANT R-S 0.27 6 2 1 Above Moderate
City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update

Page 629 ends

Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
Zoning scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN Existing Land
Use Zoning Site Size
(Acres)
Max Density
(du/ac)
Max Capacity
(units)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category
763080014 VACANT R-S 4.35 6 26 21 Above Moderate
765115004 VACANT R-S 0.26 6 2 1 Above Moderate
765114004 VACANT R-S 1.74 6 10 8 Above Moderate
763412001 VACANT R-O-6000 1.31 7 9 7 Above Moderate
763411004 VACANT R-O-6000 0.25 7 2 1 Above Moderate
763412041 VACANT R-O-6000 0.35 7 2 2 Above Moderate
763413018 VACANT R-O-6000 0.24 7 2 1 Above Moderate
765111013 VACANT R-S 0.23 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765115005 VACANT R-S 0.49 6 3 2 Above Moderate
763080019 VACANT R-S 0.15 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765111006 VACANT R-S 0.46 6 3 2 Above Moderate
765151001 VACANT R-S 0.18 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765540025 VACANT R-S 0.13 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765540024 VACANT R-S 0.22 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765540023 VACANT R-S 0.22 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765164007 VACANT R-S 0.18 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765540021 VACANT R-S 0.22 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765540020 VACANT R-S 0.22 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765540019 VACANT R-S 0.22 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765521012 VACANT R-S 3.52 6 21 17 Above Moderate
765170002 VACANT R-S 4.99 6 30 24 Above Moderate
765420015 VACANT R-S 1.56 6 9 7 Above Moderate
765184013 VACANT R-S 0.15 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765184015 VACANT R-S 0.15 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765420006 VACANT R-S 2.77 6 17 13 Above Moderate
765182018 VACANT R-S 0.17 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765184020 VACANT R-S 0.14 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765184009 VACANT R-S 0.14 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765182009 VACANT R-S 0.21 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765200008 VACANT R-S 14.78 6 89 71 Above Moderate
765212054 VACANT R-S 0.24 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765200018 VACANT R-S 3.42 6 21 16 Above Moderate
765200012 VACANT R-S 3.03 6 18 15 Above Moderate
765212033 VACANT R-S 0.13 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765213005 VACANT R-S 0.11 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765212037 VACANT R-S 0.17 6 1 1 Above Moderate
765200023 VACANT R-S 7.95 6 48 38 Above Moderate
765440022 VACANT R-S 15.32 6 92 74 Above Moderate
City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update

Page 630 ends

Item 27.

Page 631 ends

Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
General Plan Land Use Scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN APN_1 Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Size (Acres) Max
Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category Infrastructure? Notes
603150006 Vacant UN C-G 29.43 38 20 589 Above Moderate Yes Yes 763060048 763060008 Vacant UN R-M 22.48 38 20 450 Above Moderate Yes Yes 612280018 612280018 Vacant NC R-S 20.27 40 15 304 Above Moderate Yes Yes 778170010 765450002 Vacant UE R-S 17.85 65 16 286 Above Moderate Y - Requires extension through the adjacent site
Yes 763060048 763060008 Vacant UN R-S 25.45 38 10 254 Above Moderate Yes 778390002 765440022 Vacant NC R-S 15.20 40 15 228 Above Moderate Yes Yes 778180003 765460001 Vacant UE R-S 10.07 65 16 161 Above Moderate Y - Requires extension through the adjacent site
768440008 765640005 Vacant SN R-S 14.85 8 4 59 Above Moderate Yes 768430017 765200008 Vacant SN R-S 12.80 8 4 51 Above Moderate Yes 768430010 765200023 Vacant SN R-S 7.94 8 4 32 Above Moderate Yes 768430002 765200018 Vacant SN R-S 3.42 8 4 14 Above Moderate Yes 768430001 765200012 Vacant SN R-S 3.03 8 4 12 Above Moderate Yes 778280011 765420006 Vacant SN R-S 2.77 8 4 11 Above Moderate Yes Yes 768254005 765115005 Vacant NC R-S 0.49 40 15 7 Above Moderate Yes 603130009 Vacant NC R-S 0.44 40 15 7 Above Moderate Yes 603150005 Vacant UN C-G 0.33 38 20 7 Above Moderate Yes 778101002 765272002 Vacant DC C-G 0.34 65 16 6 Above Moderate Yes 778060002 765261014 Vacant DC C-G 0.35 65 16 6 Above Moderate Yes 778113002 765314009 Vacant DC C-G 0.28 65 16 5 Above Moderate Yes 778071008 765302021 Vacant DC C-G 0.33 65 16 5 Above Moderate Yes 768232014 765093021 Vacant NC C-G 0.33 40 15 5 Above Moderate Yes 603150007 Vacant UN C-G 0.26 38 20 5 Above Moderate Yes 768254001 765115001 Vacant NC R-S 0.27 40 15 4 Above Moderate Yes 778100008 765271024 Vacant DC C-G 0.25 65 16 4 Above Moderate Yes Yes 768254004 765115004 Vacant NC R-S 0.26 40 15 4 Above Moderate Yes Yes 768254003 765115003 Vacant NC R-S 0.27 40 15 4 Above Moderate Yes 768393013 765164016 Vacant NC C-G 0.18 40 15 3 Above Moderate Yes 768393012 765164015 Vacant NC C-G 0.17 40 15 3 Above Moderate Yes 768383013 765154014 Vacant NC C-G 0.18 40 15 3 Above Moderate Yes 768383012 765154013 Vacant NC C-G 0.17 40 15 3 Above Moderate Yes 768440008 765640008 Vacant SN C-G 0.73 8 4 3 Above Moderate Yes 778060001 765261012 Vacant DC C-G 0.18 65 16 3 Above Moderate Yes 768383015 765154017 Vacant NC C-G 0.17 40 15 3 Above Moderate Yes 768402019 765522019 Vacant NC C-G 0.21 40 15 3 Above Moderate Yes 778242026 765383026 Vacant NC C-G 0.19 40 15 3 Above Moderate Yes 778101002 765272002 Vacant DC R-M 0.17 65 16 3 Above Moderate Yes 778061006 765262006 Vacant DC C-G 0.20 65 16 3 Above Moderate Yes 768440010 765640008 Vacant UN C-G 0.13 38 20 3 Above Moderate Yes 768402020 765522011 Vacant NC C-G 0.20 40 15 3 Above Moderate Yes Yes 778091005 765292005 Vacant DC R-M 0.18 65 16 3 Above Moderate Yes 768450022 765601022 Vacant NC C-G 0.10 40 15 2 Above Moderate Yes 778110001 765311001 Vacant DC C-G 0.14 65 16 2 Above Moderate Yes City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Page 632 Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
General Plan Land Use Scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN APN_1 Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Size (Acres) Max
Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category Infrastructure? Notes
Yes 768413012 765184013 Vacant NC R-S 0.15 40 15 2 Above Moderate Yes 778093002 765294013 Vacant DC C-G 0.15 65 16 2 Above Moderate Yes 768450020 765601020 Vacant NC C-G 0.12 40 15 2 Above Moderate Yes 778100010 765271029 Vacant DC C-G 0.14 65 16 2 Above Moderate Yes 768383010 765154020 Vacant NC C-G 0.16 40 15 2 Above Moderate Yes 778280006 765420021 Vacant NC C-G 0.15 40 15 2 Above Moderate Yes 778100011 765271028 Vacant DC C-G 0.14 65 16 2 Above Moderate Yes Yes 768413014 765184015 Vacant NC R-S 0.15 40 15 2 Above Moderate Yes 778061004 765262004 Vacant DC C-G 0.14 65 16 2 Above Moderate Yes 768254011 765115011 Vacant NC C-G 0.14 40 15 2 Above Moderate Yes 778150001 765361001 Vacant NC R-S 0.12 40 15 2 Above Moderate Yes 768450001 765601001 Vacant NC C-G 0.11 40 15 2 Above Moderate Yes In progress rezone to RM General
768450019 765601019 Vacant NC C-G 0.11 40 15 2 Above Moderate Yes In progress rezone to RMurban 763080019 Vacant NC R-S 0.14 40 15 2 Above Moderate Yes 768450015 765601015 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768455004 765606012 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768455003 765606013 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768451005 765602003 Vacant NC C-G 0.08 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450002 765601002 Vacant NC C-G 0.10 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768222009 765083009 Vacant SN R-S 0.21 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768451006 765602010 Vacant NC C-G 0.06 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768452006 765603027 Vacant NC C-G 0.07 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768222006 765083006 Vacant SN R-S 0.22 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768460005 765200008 Vacant SN R-S 0.14 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768451002 765602006 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768393007 765164007 Vacant SN R-S 0.18 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768452002 765603014 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 763413018 763413018 Vacant SN R-O-6000 0.24 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768454002 765605014 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768222008 765083008 Vacant SN R-S 0.26 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768421005 765212037 Vacant SN R-S 0.17 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450007 765601007 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768455005 765606011 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450016 765601016 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768455002 765606014 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450009 765601009 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450013 765601013 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768411018 765182018 Vacant SN R-S 0.17 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768222003 765083003 Vacant SN R-S 0.17 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768451003 765602005 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768250003 765111013 Vacant SN R-S 0.21 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768250003 765111013 Vacant SN R-S 0.23 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Page 633 Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
General Plan Land Use Scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN APN_1 Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Size (Acres) Max
Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category Infrastructure? Notes
768450018 765601018 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768413008 765184009 Vacant SN R-S 0.14 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768453006 765604027 Vacant NC C-G 0.07 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768222005 765083005 Vacant SN R-S 0.20 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768460002 765200008 Vacant SN R-S 0.14 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450005 765601005 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768453004 765604012 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450021 765601021 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768460003 765200008 Vacant SN R-S 0.14 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 763411004 763411004 Vacant SN R-O-6000 0.25 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450017 765601017 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450008 765601008 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450003 765601003 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768152019 765623019 Vacant SN R-S 0.14 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768210036 765070009 Vacant SN R-S 0.24 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768454003 765605013 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768460001 765200008 Vacant SN R-S 0.17 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768451004 765602004 Vacant NC C-G 0.08 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768421001 765212033 Vacant SN R-S 0.13 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450010 765601010 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768453001 765604025 Vacant NC C-G 0.07 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768454004 765605012 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768413018 765184020 Vacant SN R-S 0.14 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450012 765601012 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768223001 765084001 Vacant SN R-S 0.19 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450006 765601006 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768453003 765604013 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768411009 765182009 Vacant SN R-S 0.21 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768451001 765602008 Vacant NC C-G 0.07 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768452001 765603025 Vacant NC C-G 0.07 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450011 765601011 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768454005 765605011 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768452004 765603012 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768222004 765083004 Vacant SN R-S 0.17 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768453002 765604014 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768222010 765083010 Vacant SN R-S 0.21 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768421022 765212054 Vacant SN R-S 0.24 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768454006 765605027 Vacant NC C-G 0.07 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768250006 765111006 Vacant SN R-S 0.32 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 763421037 763421037 Vacant SN R-O-6000 0.14 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450014 765601014 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 763422025 763422025 Vacant SN R-O-6000 0.15 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768454001 765605025 Vacant NC C-G 0.07 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Page 634 Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
General Plan Land Use Scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN APN_1 Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Size (Acres) Max
Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category Infrastructure? Notes
768380001 765151001 Vacant SN R-S 0.17 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768452003 765603013 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450023 765601034 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768455001 765606025 Vacant NC C-G 0.07 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768450004 765601004 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768222007 765083007 Vacant SN R-S 0.25 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768460004 765200008 Vacant SN R-S 0.14 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768453005 765604011 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768455006 765606027 Vacant NC C-G 0.07 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768210037 765070009 Vacant SN R-S 0.24 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 778320006 765440021 Vacant NC R-S 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 778320006 765440021 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 778341007 765440022 Vacant SN R-S 0.04 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 768452005 765603011 Vacant NC C-G 0.09 40 15 1 Above Moderate Yes 768152020 765623020 Vacant SN R-S 0.14 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes 763080017 Vacant SN R-S 0.13 8 4 1 Above Moderate Yes
768422005 765213005 Vacant SN R-S 0.11 8 4 0 Above Moderate Yes 768460006 765200008 Vacant SN R-S 0.10 8 4 0 Above Moderate Yes 768461036 765200008 Vacant SN R-S 0.05 8 4 0 Above Moderate Yes 778191002 778191002 Agriculture UE R-S / M-S 48.33 65 16 773.28 Above Moderate Yes 778180004 778180004 Agriculture UE R-S 40.77 65 16 652.32 Above Moderate Yes 603110008 Agriculture UN R-S 29.78 38 20 596 Above Moderate Yes 778170011 778170011 Agriculture UE R-S 32.57 65 16 521.12 Above Moderate Yes 767140006 767140006 Agriculture GN R-M 18.61 25 10 181 Above Moderate Yes 768070003 768070003 Agriculture GN R-S 14.93 25 10 149.3 Above Moderate Yes 768290003 768290003 Agriculture SN R-PUD 37.08 8 4 148.32 Above Moderate Yes 603260050 603260050 Agriculture GN R-PUD 12.06 25 10 120.6 Above Moderate Yes 768070002 768070002 Agriculture GN R-S 9.84 25 10 98.4 Above Moderate Yes 768070006 768070006 Agriculture GN R-S 8.37 25 10 83.7 Above Moderate Yes 768260003 768260003 Agriculture SN R-PUD 18.23 8 4 72.92 Above Moderate Yes 768070004 768070004 Agriculture GN R-S 5.09 25 10 50.9 Above Moderate Yes 778420004 778420004 Vacant SN R-M 5.05 8 4 20.2 Above Moderate Yes 768070005 768070005 Agriculture GN R-S 1.32 25 10 13.2 Above Moderate Yes In Vista Del Agua SP.

Capacity based on Specific
Plan buildout in PA10
603310025 603310025 Retail/Commercial DC C-G 0.48 65 16 8 Above Moderate Yes 603310005 603310005 Retail/Commercial DC C-G 0.44 65 16 7 Above Moderate Yes 603310022 603310022 Retail/Commercial DC C-G 0.36 65 16 6 Above Moderate Yes 603310012 603310012 Retail/Commercial DC C-G 0.39 65 16 6 Above Moderate Yes 603310004 603310004 Retail/Commercial DC C-G 0.09 65 16 1 Above Moderate Yes In Vista Del Agua SP.

Capacity based on Specific
Plan buildout in PA2
City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Page 635 Item 27.

Capacity based on Specific
Plan buildout in PA8
778390003 765440003 Vacant UE M-S 4.40 65 20 88 Lower Yes 778081003 765322018 Vacant DC C-G 2.54 65 32 81 Lower Yes 778390004 765440004 Vacant UE M-S 4.75 65 16 76 Lower Yes 778010017 765240005 Vacant DC C-G 2.30 65 32 74 Lower Yes 768430012 765200021 Vacant NC C-G 4.30 40 15 64 Lower Yes 778170010 765450002 Vacant UE M-S 3.83 65 16 61 Lower Y - Requires extension through the adjacent site
778010017 765220026 Vacant DC C-G 1.81 65 32 58 Lower Yes Yes 763060048 763060008 Vacant NC R-M 8.09 40 10 39 Lower Yes 778010016 765220026 Vacant DC C-G 0.96 65 32 31 Lower Yes Yes 778010013 765240005 Vacant DC C-G 0.93 65 32 30 Lower Yes 778010014 765240005 Vacant DC C-G 0.84 65 32 27 Lower Yes 768253005 765114004 Vacant NC R-S 1.74 40 15 26 Lower Yes 778070002 765301003 Vacant DC C-G 0.78 65 32 25 Lower Yes Yes 778280009 765420015 Vacant NC R-S 1.56 40 15 23 Lower Yes 603310001 603310001 Vacant DC C-G 0.61 65 32 20 Lower Yes Yes 603241005 603241005 Vacant NC R-S 1.34 40 15 20 Lower Yes 778071005 765302010 Vacant DC C-G 0.59 65 32 19 Lower Yes Yes 778113001 765314008 Vacant DC C-G 0.58 65 32 18 Lower Yes 778320006 765430048 Vacant NC R-M 1.06 40 15 16 Lower Yes 778280001 765420018 Vacant NC C-G 0.99 40 15 15 Lower Yes 768210023 765070035 Vacant NC C-G 1.00 40 15 15 Lower Yes 778242022 765383023 Vacant NC C-G 0.98 40 15 15 Lower Yes in process to rezone to RM (urban)
778280003 765420020 Vacant NC C-G 0.90 40 15 14 Lower Yes 778242025 765383023 Vacant NC C-G 0.94 40 15 14 Lower Yes 778280002 765420019 Vacant NC C-G 0.90 40 15 14 Lower Yes 778242023 765383023 Vacant NC C-G 0.88 40 15 13 Lower Yes 778242026 765383023 Vacant NC C-G 0.87 40 15 13 Lower Yes in process to rezone to RM (urban)
778242024 765383023 Vacant NC C-G 0.90 40 15 13 Lower Yes 768440012 765640012 Vacant NC C-G 0.73 40 15 11 Lower Yes 767140002 767140002 Agriculture NC R-M 9.64 40 15 145 Lower Yes 603281053 603281053 Commercial NC C-G 8.13 40 15 121.95 Lower Yes 767140002 767140002 Agriculture GN C-G 9.46 25 10 95 Lower Yes City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Page 636 Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
General Plan Land Use Scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN APN_1 Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Size (Acres) Max
Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category Infrastructure? Notes
763131018 763131018 Vacant Ind M-H 5.16 65 16 83 Lower Yes 763131017 763131017 Vacant Ind M-H 4.06 65 16 65 Lower Yes 763400016 763400016 Vacant Ind M-H 3.54 65 16 57 Lower Yes 763400017 763400017 Vacant Ind M-H 3.59 65 16 57 Lower Yes 778420016 778420016 Vacant UE R-S 2.89 65 16 46.24 Lower Yes 603310024 603310024 Retail/Commercial DC C-G 2.66 65 16 43 Lower Yes 603310017 603310017 Retail/Commercial DC C-G 1.38 65 16 22 Lower Yes 603310026 603310026 Retail/Commercial DC C-G 0.74 65 16 12 Lower Yes 603310021 603310021 Retail/Commercial DC C-G 0.67 65 16 11 Lower Yes 603281044 603281044 Commercial NC C-G 0.71 40 15 10.65 Lower Yes Subtotal Lower 2345
778390007 765440007 Vacant UE M-S 78.23 65 20 630 Moderate Yes 778180003 765460001 Vacant UE M-S 18.29 65 16 293 Moderate Yes 778390005 765440008 Vacant UE M-S 29.34 65 20 192 Moderate Yes 768350002 765170002 Vacant GN R-S 4.99 25 10 50 Moderate Yes 768400001 765521012 Vacant GN R-S 3.52 25 10 35 Moderate Yes Yes 778414040 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 1.17 25 10 12 Moderate Yes 763060032 763060032 Vacant GN R-M 1.07 25 10 11 Moderate Yes 603270017 603270017 Vacant GN R-M 0.56 25 10 6 Moderate Yes 778415007 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.51 25 10 5 Moderate Yes 778413023 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.53 25 10 5 Moderate Yes 778191002 765472004 Vacant UE M-S 0.14 65 32 5 Moderate Yes Yes 778414039 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.37 25 10 4 Moderate Yes Yes 778054004 765285005 Vacant GN C-G 0.32 25 10 3 Moderate Yes Yes 778040002 765251013 Vacant GN R-S 0.17 25 10 2 Moderate Yes Yes 778044013 765255013 Vacant GN R-S 0.16 25 10 2 Moderate Yes Yes 778105001 765276022 Vacant GN R-S 0.17 25 10 2 Moderate Yes 778414041 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.17 25 10 2 Moderate Yes Yes 778104010 765275006 Vacant GN R-S 0.18 25 10 2 Moderate Yes Yes 778105012 765276014 Vacant GN R-M 0.17 25 10 2 Moderate Yes 778042009 765253009 Vacant GN R-S 0.21 25 10 2 Moderate Yes Yes 778400030 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.17 25 10 2 Moderate Yes 778411027 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778415006 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes Yes 778414014 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410007 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411014 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.10 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411024 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.06 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411023 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414007 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778090006 765291009 Vacant GN C-G 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778405010 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778405003 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Page 637 Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
General Plan Land Use Scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN APN_1 Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Size (Acres) Max
Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category Infrastructure? Notes
778414032 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412001 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403018 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410008 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778407005 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410014 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414026 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413004 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414017 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413006 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778415005 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403029 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413007 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes in process to rezone to RM
(urban). Only 31.5 acres
though.
778405008 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411004 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412008 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413011 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403030 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414003 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413022 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403032 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.10 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411003 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778405004 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778406010 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413019 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404008 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778104007 765275011 Vacant GN R-S 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411010 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413014 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411005 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.06 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412007 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403019 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403022 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778405012 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778407006 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411015 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.11 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778415008 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.07 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778415008 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.05 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414034 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403031 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778406005 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Page 638 Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
General Plan Land Use Scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN APN_1 Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Size (Acres) Max
Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category Infrastructure? Notes
778406004 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413013 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411019 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413002 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778045007 765256007 Vacant GN R-S 0.10 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778405001 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.11 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778042007 765253007 Vacant GN R-S 0.14 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403020 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes Yes 778410015 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413017 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes Yes 778413021 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410003 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778406009 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412006 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413005 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778405007 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403024 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403021 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412009 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414022 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778405005 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410013 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412014 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411001 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413018 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.07 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778406002 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412005 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414029 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.12 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403043 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.14 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778406001 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.11 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404004 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404002 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes Yes 778411011 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413001 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410009 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412013 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414015 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411012 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404009 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414011 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411016 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778415001 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412012 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Page 639 Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
General Plan Land Use Scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN APN_1 Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Size (Acres) Max
Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category Infrastructure? Notes
778411002 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410011 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414037 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778407002 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410016 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412002 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411026 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403025 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404005 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414013 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes in process to rezone to RM (urban). Only 9.6 ares
778414038 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414025 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413003 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778407001 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.11 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414020 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778405002 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404014 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.10 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778415002 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411009 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404006 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411028 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410002 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411020 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414024 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413016 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414031 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414023 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403026 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413012 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414012 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410010 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411017 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414002 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411007 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413010 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414009 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412004 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414010 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404007 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411022 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404011 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Page 640 Item 27.

Coachella- Site Inventory Table
General Plan Land Use Scenario
In Previous
Cycle? APN APN_1 Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Size (Acres) Max
Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Density
(du/ac)
Realistic Capacity
(units) Income Category Infrastructure? Notes
778405013 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414005 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414035 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414036 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778415004 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412011 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414006 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403023 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778407004 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778104009 765275007 Vacant GN R-S 0.10 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778405009 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411025 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778092008 765293008 Vacant GN C-G 0.14 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404010 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414008 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410004 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414018 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414001 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778406008 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411008 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414019 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414028 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.12 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778406006 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414030 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778405011 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404012 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410001 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414027 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404003 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778412003 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413015 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778403017 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778406003 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778406011 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414004 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.09 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778405006 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778410006 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778413008 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778405014 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.10 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778404013 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778407003 765440016 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778414021 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes 778411013 765440012 Vacant GN R-PUD 0.08 25 10 1 Moderate Yes City of Coachella- 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Page 641 Item 27.

Page 643 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-1
Appendix C:Housing Constraints
Contents
Appendix C: Housing Constraints ......................................................... C-1 Section C.1 Introduction......................................................................................................C-2 Section C.2 Governmental Constraints ...............................................................................C-2 C.2.1 Introduction......................................................................................................C-2 C.2.2 Land Use Controls ...........................................................................................C-2 C.2.3 Building and Housing Codes and Enforcement ..............................................C-25 C.2.4 Permits and Procedures.................................................................................C-25 C.2.5 On and Off-site Improvements .......................................................................C-32 Section C.3 Non-Governmental Constraints......................................................................C-33 C.3.1 Housing Supply/Conditions ............................................................................C-33 C.3.2 Development Costs........................................................................................C-34 C.3.3 Availability of Financing..................................................................................C-35 C.3.4 Summary .......................................................................................................C-36 Section C.4 Environmental and Infrastructure Constraints ................................................C-37 C.4.1 Environmental Constraints .............................................................................C-37 C.4.2 Infrastructure Constraints...............................................................................C-37

Page 644 ends

Item 27.

C-2 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
Section C.1 Introduction
The provision of decent, safe, and affordable housing is an important goal of the City of Coachella.

However, there are a variety of factors that encourage or constrain the development, maintenance, and improvement of the housing stock in the City. These include market mechanisms, government codes and regulations, and physical and environmental constraints. This section reviews and analyzes these potential constraints, in terms of a) governmental constraints, b) nongovernmental including market constraints, and c) environmental and infrastructural constraints.

Section C.2 Governmental Constraints
C.2.1 Introduction
Local policies and regulations can affect the quantity and type of residential development. Since governmental actions can constrain the development and the affordability of housing, State law requires the housing element to "address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing" (Government Code § 65583(c)(3)).

The City’s primary policies and regulations that affect residential development and housing affordability include: the Zoning Ordinance, the General Plan, development processing procedures and fees, on and off-site improvement requirements, and the California Building and Housing Codes. In addition to a review of these policies and regulations, an analysis of the governmental constraints on housing production for persons with disabilities is included in this Section.

C.2.2 Land Use Controls
This section provides an overview of the City’s land use controls and their relation to the City’s housing supply.

General Plan Land Use Designations
The City of Coachella adopted the General Plan Update in 2015. Chapter 4 of the General Plan is the Land Use and Community Character Element which directs the location and form of future development in the city. The 2015 General Plan has not yet been implemented through a comprehensive zoning ordinance update. The lack of an updated zoning ordinance reflecting the latest General Plan policies presents a significant constraint to the development of housing.

Government Code § 65583(c)(7) requires the identification of “means by which consistency will be achieved with other general plan elements and community goals”. The City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance are inconsistent with one another and the City must update the Zoning Ordinance to be consistent with the General Plan. (see Program 1.1) In the interim, the provisions

Page 645 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-3
of Senate Bill 330 allow for the City to approve projects consistent with the General Plan policies, land use designations, and densities in advance of a zoning ordinance update.

The General Plan includes nine land use designations that allow a range of residential development types (see Table C-1), at a variety of densities.

Table C-1: City General Plan Residential Land Use Designations General Plan Designation Allowed Density Description
Agricultural Rancho 1 unit per parcel or 1 unit per
40 acres
The Agricultural Rancho designation provides
areas for productive agriculture uses in the City.

Agricultural areas provide for active uses such
as date farms, field crops or grapes. In some
cases, this designation also encompasses other
working lands that provide an open space
benefit or are in other ways a non-urban land
use, such as mining. These rural environments
– and the natural and agricultural systems that
define them – are intended to be preserved in
perpetuity and may not be converted for urban
use.

Rural Rancho 0.4 (1 unit per 2.5 acres) – 1
du/ac
The Rural Rancho designation accommodates
low intensity residential development within a
preserved rural landscape. These areas are
intended to serve as a buffer between
Agriculture and any of the urban designations of
this Plan or as the edge of the urbanized City.

Suburban Neighborhood 2 – 8, with 5 du/ac average
for new projects
Suburban Neighborhoods provide a lower
intensity, quieter, family-living environment but
are still well connected to surrounding
neighborhoods, retail areas as well as natural
and agricultural open spaces. Because
Suburban Neighborhoods are less compact
than General Neighborhoods, they are
inherently less walkable and amenities such as
parks, schools and convenience retail are
farther from most residences. Accordingly,
greater accommodation is provided to the
automobile in these Neighborhoods, and
greater attention must be paid to bike routes.

General Neighborhood 7 – 25 du/ac, with 12 du/ac
average for new projects
General Neighborhoods provide a diversity of
housing that meets the needs of Coachella’s
many household sizes, incomes, and lifestyle
preferences. General Neighborhoods integrate
a range of single- and multi-family housing
options within a green, walkable neighborhood
environment that offers parks and playgrounds
for their residents and access to schools and
basic shopping needs within a comfortable
walk, bike ride or short drive.

Urban Neighborhood 20 – 38 du/ac with 30 du/ac
average for new projects
Urban Neighborhoods create a high-intensity,
walkable, transit-ready neighborhood with a
variety of types of housing - predominantly
multi-family of various types. Urban
Neighborhoods should be located in close
proximity to high quantities of commercial, civic
and recreational uses. The value of the Urban

Page 646 ends

Item 27.

C-4 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
Table C-1: City General Plan Residential Land Use Designations General Plan Designation Allowed Density Description
Neighborhood derives from its compactness,
and the degree to which it allows a larger
number of residents to live near one another,
within easy walking distance of parks, schools,
shops, transit and employment.

Neighborhood Center 15 – 40 du/ac
This designation creates a concentration of
commercial businesses and civic amenities—
often mixed with multi-family housing—within
convenient walking or biking distance of nearby
neighborhoods. Centers provide gathering
places for the residents of surrounding
neighborhoods and are ideal locations for highquality transit stops.

Downtown Center 20 – 65 du/ac
As Neighborhood Centers bring residents of
surrounding neighborhoods together by
providing a convenient and congenial
environment for everyday shopping and dining,
the Downtown brings the entire community
together in a one-of-a-kind Coachella center
that is the civic heart of the City.

Urban Employment Center 30 – 65 du/ac
This General Plan designation provides space
for a range of employment uses to help expand
and diversify the City’s economy and transform
Coachella from a small town to a full-service
city. The desired employment uses are office
and research and development rather than
industrial uses such as manufacturing,
distribution and warehouse. The employment
uses are supported by retail, service and similar
uses. Residential uses are allowed in
residential-only buildings or in a mixed-use
configuration with ground-floor retail. Also
allowed are higher education uses (such as a
college or university) designed in urban setting.

Regional Retail District 10 – 15 du/ac
This designation provides opportunities for a
wide range of shopping and entertainment in a
variety of urban and suburban formats. These
include regional shopping centers, mixed
destination centers or similar uses. The uses
allowed in this designation will cater to regional
clientele and provide a unique amenity to all
residents of the Coachella Valley and an
important revenue source for the City. The
primary purpose of the District is to provide for
commercial opportunities, with residential uses
supporting the retail environment.

Source: City of Coachella General Plan (2015)

Page 647 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-5
Zoning Districts
Title 17 of the Coachella Code of Ordinances contains the Zoning Ordinance. This section analyzes the Zoning Ordinance and the zones which allow residential development.

There are a total of seven base zones and three overlay zones as well as ten zones within the La Entrada and Vista Del Agua Specific Plans that allow residential development with various densities and housing types. Table C-2 lists the zones that allow residential development with a description of each.

Table C-2: Residential Zones
Zone Description
Agricultural Reserve Zone
This zone is intended to preserve certain designated prime agricultural lands within the city and protect those lands, which are deemed to be agricultural preserves, from the intrusion of urban development incompatible with agricultural land uses. This zone designation is reserved for only those lands which are subject to recorded Williamson Act contracts pursuant to Government Code, §51200 et seq.

Agricultural Transition
Zone
This zone has the purpose of permitting the continued agricultural use of those lands suited to eventual development in other uses and zones, pending proper timing for the economical provisions of utilities, major streets, and other facilities, so that compact, orderly development will occur.

Residential Estate Zone
This zone is intended to provide for the establishment of residential areas which are to be developed at low density and with reasonable and adequate limitations, safeguards, and controls for the keeping and maintenance of horses in those areas of the city where noncommercial equestrian activities may be an integral part of the neighborhood amenities.

Single-Family Zone
This zone is intended to provide areas within the city where development is limited to lowdensity concentrations of single-family dwellings, and to stabilize and protect the residential character of such areas. It has the further purpose of the provision of community facilities needed to complement urban residential areas and for institutions which require a residential environment and to minimize traffic congestion and to avoid an overload of utilities designed to service only low-density residential uses. The provisions of this zone are intended to encourage a suitable environment for family life through the regulation of densities of development, yards, fencing, heights, and similar aspects of development.

Residential Overlay Zone
The R-O-6000 zone is intended to provide adequate housing for all persons regardless of age, race, ethnic background, national origin, religion, family size, marital status, handicap, or any other arbitrary factor so long as such use is consistent with sound standards of public health and safety. It has the further purpose of maintaining and promoting residential living environments compatible and in harmony with the previously established patterns of development of existing low- and moderate-income housing. As such, the objective of this zoning designation is to provide the City with a device needed to correct existing shortages and to meet projected growth needs within the city.

Multiple-Family Zone
This zone is intended to provide for the establishment and expansion of multiple-family residential development areas at various medium and high population densities and related community services, all located in conformance with the general plan.

Mobile Home Subdivision
Zone
It is the intent of this chapter to provide regulations for the placement of mobile homes on individual lots within an approved subdivision specifically designed and designated for the sale, not rental, of lots to accommodate mobile homes as the dwelling unit. The minimum site that may be zoned for this purpose shall be twenty (20) acres, including one-half but not to exceed thirty-three (33) feet of width of adjacent boundary streets dedicated to the public.

Page 648 ends

Item 27.

C-6 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
Table C-2: Residential Zones
Zone Description
Neighborhood
Commercial Zone
This zone is intended to provide for every day, convenience shopping intended to serve residential neighborhoods, consistent with the environmental requirements of such neighborhoods. Convenience shopping facilities are those which provide space for retail and service businesses serving the immediate neighborhood. The provisions of this zone are intended to minimize or eliminate, insofar as possible, any conflicting aspects of commercial land use within residential neighborhoods, particularly as related to traffic, type of activity, and site requirements.

Senior Housing Overlay
Zone
The senior housing overlay district (SHO) is established to provide for the development of senior citizen housing pursuant to standards that reflect the unique needs and character of senior citizen housing in the city of Coachella. As such, it is the objective of this overlay district to encourage the development of senior citizen housing with appropriate amenities tailored to the needs of seniors to address the current shortage of affordable senior housing in the city as well as the projected growth needs of the senior citizen community.

The SHO District shall provide standard incentives for the development of a wide variety of specialized housing designed and restricted to residents aged fifty-five (55) years or older and qualified disabled residents.

Planned Unit
Developments
The purpose of this chapter is to provide for attractive, planned, residential districts in accordance with the general plan; to provide a means of achieving greater quality, variety and flexibility in residential development on relatively large areas of land; to encourage more imaginative and innovative design of projects; to promote more desirable living environments that would not be possible through the strict application of zoning standards; to assist in the development of old or blighted neighborhoods by providing incentives for higher quality multiple residential housing and project design; to require a more efficient use of open space, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and increased project amenities; to insure that such projects will be assets to their surrounding neighborhoods, and safeguards will be required through the conditional use procedure. The overall plan shall provide equivalent or higher standards of development, operation, light, air, safety, convenience, and aesthetics, than if developed under the underlying zone.

La Entrada Specific Plan
Very Low Density
Residential
The VLDR land use designation proposes up to approximately 133 residential dwelling units within two planning areas on approximately 66.4 acres of the site. As proposed, this land use designation will allow a range of 0.5-2.9 dwelling units per acre, located in the Hillside Village within the easternmost portion of the site. The lower density associated with this designation is meant to complement the surrounding open space areas located adjacent to these planning areas, and work with the existing landforms to create a neighborhood that blends with the existing slopes and uses landform grading to the extent possible.

Low Density Residential
The LDR land use designation proposes up to approximately 2,055 residential dwelling units within nine planning areas on approximately 448.7 acres. As proposed, this land use designation will allow a range of 3.0-5.9 dwelling units per acre, located predominantly within the northeastern portions of the Specific Plan area east of Street “A”. Many of these planning areas are located in areas of higher elevation adjacent to the open space areas along the northeastern edge of the Specific Plan. This low intensity land use provides a transition between the open space areas and the higher intensity development areas of the project.

Medium Density
Residential
The MDR land use designation proposes up to approximately 3,060 residential dwelling units within 19 planning areas on approximately 374.2acres of the site. As proposed this land use designation will allow a range of 6.0-12.9 dwelling units per acre, although densities could be lower, and will be located predominantly along the southwestern portion of the Specific Plan area, with a majority of them sited west of Street “A”. Many of these planning areas are located adjacent to the Village Paseo, park/recreation and open space areas of the Specific Plan and are associated with the community core areas of each village (which are comprised of mixed use and higher density residential uses).

Page 649 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-7
Table C-2: Residential Zones
Zone Description
High Density Residential
The HDR land use designation proposes up to approximately 1,832 residential dwelling units within six planning areas on approximately 91.6 acres of the site. As proposed this land use designation will allow a range of 13.0-25 dwelling units per acre, although densities could be lower, and will be located in close proximity to Mixed Use areas proposed in the Specific Plan. The HDR planning areas are mainly located along the major collector/arterial roadways within the Specific Plan and adjacent to the freeway. In addition, HDR uses are anticipated within the Mixed Use areas of the plan (see discussion below).

Mixed Use Residential
The Mixed Use designation proposes development of commercial/retail/office and community uses, along with high density residential uses in strategic locations through the site, associated with three Community Core areas of the project. The primary and largest Mixed Use location is proposed at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Street “A” in the Gateway Village in the northwestern portion of the site. Avenue 50 within this area is proposed to connect to Interstate 10, which will provide this portion of the site freeway access. Two other less intense Mixed Use areas are proposed along the Street “A” corridor. The three Mixed Use areas are connected by the Village Paseo and the offstreet trail system on Avenue “A”, or a potential future Sunline Transit Agency bus route extension.

Totaling approximately 135 acres, the MU designation will allow up to 99 acres of retail commercial and office use and up to approximately 720 high density residential units within 8 planning areas. Commercial development potential associated with the Mixed Use designation is estimated at approximately 1,510,879 square feet of retail commercial and office use based on an average floor area ratio of 0.35. Maximum FAR is 0.45 as outlined in the Development Regulations of this Specific Plan.

Vista del Agua Specific Plan
SingleFamily
Residential
R-1 4,000
The range of housing types within the Vista Del Agua Specific Plan includes a variety of single-family dwelling types, R-1 4,000, R-1 5,000 and R-1 6,000 residential are incorporated into four planning areas. These single-family areas are composed of four thousand square foot (4,000 sf) lot minimums, five thousand square foot (5,000 sf) lot minimums and six thousand square foot (6,000 sf) minimum lots. These three (3) minimum lot sizes will allow for a variety of single family detached residences within the proposed community.

R-1 5,000
R-1 6,000
MultiFamily
Residential
Cluster
Development
The multi-family residential component to the Vista Del Agua Specific Plan consists of three planning areas.

Planning Areas 2 & 3 will contain seventeen point four acres (17.44 ac.). These planning areas are located within walking distance to major thoroughfares, employment centers and commercial services, and therefore will contain the highest density in the Vista Del Agua Specific Plan at twenty units per acre (20 DU/ac.) This multi-family attached designation is characterized by low-rise condominiums or apartment buildings. This development will provide buildings up to three stories in height with recreation and community facilities with common open space areas.

Planning Area 4 will contain twenty-two point zero five acres (22.05 ac.). This multi-family area will allow for row townhomes, auto-court townhomes, paired homes, condominiums, or duplex product types. This multi-family component will be developed at a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre (12 DU/ac.) and will be located at the southwest corner of Street “A” and Avenue 47.

Multi-Family
Source: City of Coachella General Plan (2015); La Entrada Specific Plan, Vista del Agua Specific Plan

Page 650 ends

Item 27.

C-8 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
Development Standards
Development standards can constrain new residential development if the standards make it economically unfeasible or physically impractical to develop a particular lot, or there are not suitable parcels which meet the development criteria for building form, massing, height, and density in a particular zone.

Through its Zoning Ordinance, the City enforces minimum development standards for new residential uses. Table C-3 summarizes the basic standards for the City’s zones that allow residential development.

Table C-3: Development Standards in Zones that Allow Residential Development Zone Zone
Min. Lot
Size
Density
(units/
acre)
Min. Setbacks (ft.) Max.

Height
Max. Lot
Coverage
Min.

Open
Space
Front Side Rear
Agricultural
Reserve Zone A-R 40 acres
1 du/40-
acre lot
max.

Center line of
street: 60
Street line: 20
20 25
2 stories or
35 ft.,
whichever
is less

N/A N/A
Agricultural
Transition
Zone
A-T 5 acres 1 du/5-acre
lot max.

Center line of
street: 60
Street line: 20
20 25
2 stories or
35 ft.,
whichever
is less

N/A N/A
Residential
Estate Zone R-E
20,000
sq.ft.
1 du/ac
max.

Center line of
street: 60
Street line: 20
20 25
2 stories or
35 ft.,
whichever
is less

N/A N/A
Single-Family
Zone R-S
Interior
lots: 7,200
sq.ft.

Corner
lots: 7,200
sq.ft.

Avg. for
subdiv.::
7,000
sq.ft.
6 du/ac
max.

Main Unit: 15
Front-loading
garages: 20
Side-loaded
garages: 12
5 + 10 (15
combined)
Street
side: 10
20 2 stories
(30 ft.) 40% N/A
Residential
Overlay Zone
R-0-
6000
6,000
sq.ft.
7 du/ac
max.

Main Unit: 20
Side entry
garage: 12
Interior
lots: 5
Street
side: 10
15 2 stories or
35 ft.,
whichever
is less
40% N/A
MultipleFamily Zone R-M
Singlefamily
detached:
5,000
sq.ft.

Singlefamily
attached:
4,500
21 du/ac
max.
15 Interior
and corner
lots: 5 20
3 stories or
45 ft.,
whichever
is less
N/A
25% of
req. lot
area per
DU

Page 651 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-9
Table C-3: Development Standards in Zones that Allow Residential Development Zone Zone
Min. Lot
Size
Density
(units/
acre)
Min. Setbacks (ft.) Max.

Height
Max. Lot
Coverage
Min.

Open
Space
Front Side Rear
sq.ft.

Multifamily (5+
DU):
10,000
sq.ft.

Mobilehome
Subdivision
Zone
R-MH 4,500
sq.ft.
9 du/ac
max.
20 Min street
frontage: 35
5 5
Primary
use: 15 ft.

Accessory
use: 15 ft.

Conditional
use: 2
stories or
35 ft.,
whichever
is less

N/A N/A
Neighborhood
Commercial
Zone
C-N
5,000
sq.ft.
8 du/ac
max.

One or both
adjoining
zones are
res.: equal in
depth to the
avg. of req.
front yards of
adjoining
zones
Adjoining
street or
res. Zone:
10 Reversed
corner lot:
no less
than the
req. front
yard of
adjoining
key lot to
the rear
Adjoining
res. zone:
10 Adjoining
res. Use:
20 2 stories or
35 ft.,
whichever
is less
None N/A
Senior
Housing
Overlay Zone
SHO
Multifamily:
20,000
sq.ft.

Singlefamily:
2,500
sq.ft.

Dependent
upon base
zone
Detached
single-family:
20 Additional 1 ft.
of setback per
every foot in
height over 18
ft.

Detached
singlefamily:

Interior
side: 5
Exterior
side: 10
Detached
singlefamily: 10
Singlefamily
detached:
18 N/A N/A
La Entrada Specific Plan
Very Low
Density
Residential
VLDR 10,000
sq.ft

0.5-2.9
du/ac
Living space:
20 Interior: 10
(10% of lot
width)
Living
space: 15
Porch,
balcony,
or deck:
10 Primary
structure:
25 Accessory
structure:
15 60% N/A

Page 652 ends

Item 27.

C-10 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
Table C-3: Development Standards in Zones that Allow Residential Development Zone Zone
Min. Lot
Size
Density
(units/
acre)
Min. Setbacks (ft.) Max.

Height
Max. Lot
Coverage
Min.

Open
Space
Front Side Rear
Low Density
Residential LDR 5,500 sq.ft.

3.0-5.9
du/ac
Living space:
10 Interior: 5
Street: 10
Living
space
adjacent
to street:
15 Living
space not
adjacent
to street:
10 Patio
cover,
balcony,
or deck: 5
Garage:
5-8 or 18+
Primary
structure:
30 Accessory
structure:
15 65% N/A
Medium
Density
Residential
(Detached)
MDR 1,925
sq.ft.

6.0-12.9
du/ac
Facing the
street
Living space:
10 Facing motor
court
Living space:
5 Facing paseo
Living space:
5 Interior,
alley, or
motor
court: 5
Street: 10
Living
space
adjacent
to street:
10 Living
space not
adjacent
to street:
8 Patio
cover,
balcony,
or deck: 5
Garage:
5-8 or 18+
Primary
structure:
36 (2
stories)
Accessory:
15 70%
Private:
80 sq.ft.
per unit
Common:
100 sq.ft.
per unit
Medium
Density
Residential
(Attached)
MDR N/A 6.0-12.9
du/ac
Facing the
street
Living space:
8 Facing motor
court
Living space:
5 Facing paseo
Living space:
5 Interior,
alley, or
motor
court: 5
Street: 10
Living
space
adjacent
to street:
12 Living
space not
adjacent
to street:
10 (5 on
motor
court)
Patio
cover,
balcony,
or deck: 5
(3 on
motor
court)
Primary
structure:
36 (2
stories)
Accessory:
15 70%
Private:
80 sq.ft.
per unit
Common:
100 sq.ft.
per unit

Page 653 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-11
Table C-3: Development Standards in Zones that Allow Residential Development Zone Zone
Min. Lot
Size
Density
(units/
acre)
Min. Setbacks (ft.) Max.

Height
Max. Lot
Coverage
Min.

Open
Space
Front Side Rear
Garage:
3-8 or 18+
High Density
Residential
(Detached)
HDR 1,750
sq.ft.

13.0-25.0
du/ac
Facing the
street
Living space:
5 Facing motor
court
Living space:
5 Facing paseo
Living space:
3 Interior or
alley: 5
Street: 10
Living
space
adjacent
to street:
10 Living
space not
adjacent
to street:
5 Patio
cover,
balcony,
or deck: 3
Garage:
3-8 or 18+
Primary
structure:
45 (3
stories)
Accessory:
15 70%
Private:
80 sq.ft.
per unit 1
Common:
100 sq.ft.
per unit 1
High Density
Residential
(Attached)
HDR N/A 13.0-25.0
du/ac
Facing the
street
Living space:
5 Facing motor
court
Living space:
5 Facing paseo
Living space:
3 Interior,
alley, or
motor
court: 5
Street: 10
Living
space
adjacent
to street:
10 Living
space not
adjacent
to street:
5 Patio
cover,
balcony,
or deck: 3
Garage:
3-8 or 18+
Primary
structure:
45 (3
stories)
Accessory:
15 75%
Common:
80/48 2
sq.ft.

Private:
100/150 2
sq.ft.

Mixed Use
Residential MU N/A 13.0-25.0 du/ac
Facing the
street
Living space:
5 Facing motor
court
Living space:
5 Facing paseo
Interior,
alley, or
motor
court: 5
Street: 10
Living
space
adjacent
to street:
10 Living
space not
adjacent
to street:
5 Patio
cover,
balcony,
Primary
structure:
45 (3
stories)
Accessory:
15 75%
Common:
80/48 2
sq.ft.

Private:

N/A

Page 654 ends

Item 27.

C-12 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
Table C-3: Development Standards in Zones that Allow Residential Development Zone Zone
Min. Lot
Size
Density
(units/
acre)
Min. Setbacks (ft.) Max.

Height
Max. Lot
Coverage
Min.

Open
Space
Front Side Rear
Living space:
5 or deck: 3
Garage:
3-8 or 18+
Vista del Agua Specific Plan
Single-Family
Residential
R-1
4,000
4,000
sq.ft. 7.0 du
Living area:
12 Porches: 8
Interior: 5
Street: 10
Turn in
garage: 3
Main
structure:
15 Garage: 5
Patio
cover: 5
Second
story
deck: 10
Accessory
structure:
3 Main
structure:
35 Accessory
structure:
14 55%
Common:
7% of
planning
area
R-1
5,000
5,000
sq.ft. 6.0 du
Living area:
15 Porches: 8
Interior: 5
Street: 10
Turn in
garage: 3
Main
structure:
15 Garage: 5
Patio
cover: 5
Second
story
deck: 10
Accessory
structure:
3 Main
structure:
35 Accessory
structure:
14 55%
Common:
7% of
planning
area
R-1
6,000
6,000
sq.ft. 5.0 du
Living area:
17 Porches: 8
Interior: 5
Street: 10
Turn in
garage: 3
Main
structure:
15 Garage: 5
Patio
cover: 5
Second
story
deck: 10
Accessory
structure:
3 Main
structure:
35 Accessory
structure:
14 55%
Common:
7% of
planning
area
Multi-Family
Residential
Cluster
Development
5,000
sq.ft. 12.0 du
Perimeter
building: 15
Interior
building: 10
Perimeter
building
street: 15
Perimeter
building
property
line: 10
Interior
Perimeter
building
street: 15
Perimeter
building
property
line: 15
40 60%
Common:
7% of
planning
area

Page 655 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-13
Table C-3: Development Standards in Zones that Allow Residential Development Zone Zone
Min. Lot
Size
Density
(units/
acre)
Min. Setbacks (ft.) Max.

Height
Max. Lot
Coverage
Min.

Open
Space
Front Side Rear
building
street: 10
Interior
building
property
line: 0
Interior
building: 0
MultiFamily7,200
sq.ft. 20.0 du Building: 20Parking: 20
Interior: 5
Street: 10
Turn in
garage: 3
Building:
15 Parking:
20 55 60%
Common:
7% of
planning
area
Private
ground
level: 50
sq.ft.
(min: 7 ft.
horizontal,
8 ft.
vertical)
1 The standards only apply to detached motor court cluster product types. 2 150 sq.ft. of common outdoor open space and 48 sq.ft. of private outdoor open space shall be provided for multi-family flat product types.

Source: City of Coachella Zoning Ordinance; La Entrada Specific Plan, Vista del Agua Specific Plan Conclusion
The development standards in Table C-3 present a constraint to the development of housing.

Only one zone, R-M, allows multi-family housing as a primary use, at a maximum of three stories.

Density achievable under the R-M zone is limited to 20 units per acre, below the 30 units per acre threshold HCD determines feasible for affordable housing development. The C-N zone allows for multi-family dwelling units as well, but it is limited to the second story in a maximum two-story building. The density ranges for multi-family dwellings are complicated and vary depending on lot size and the number of units. The vast majority of base zoning districts only allow for single-family dwellings on moderate to large lots. The La Entrada Specific Plan allows for multi-family housing but limited to three story buildings. In addition, the requirement of an architectural review of all residential development with no objective criteria presents a constraint to the development of housing, as a subjective approval process can be unpredictable. Beyond the subjective criteria for mobilehomes in the A-R, A-T, and R-E zones, no design criteria is given for residential development. The City proposes Program 5.1 to update the Zoning code to facilitate production of a variety of housing types, at densities consistent with the General Plan.

Page 656 ends

Item 27.

C-14 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
Parking Standards
Table C-4 displays the required parking rates for residential land uses, applicable to all zones.

Table C-4: Parking Rates for Residential Land Uses
Residential Use Required Number of Spaces
Single-Family, Detached
R-0-6000 overlay zone 1 enclosed space per unit
In all other zones 2 enclosed space per unit
Multi-Family, Attached Single-Family, Duplexes
1-bedroom or studio 1 covered space + 2/3 open space per unit 2 or more bedrooms 1 covered space + 1 and 1/3 open space per unit Boardinghouses, Fraternities and Group Living
Quarters 1 space per resident
Convalescent and Sanitariums, Nursing Homes,
Rest Homes, Retirement Homes and Similar
Establishments
1 space per each 3 licensed beds
Senior Housing Overlay Zone
Active Retirement Community
Single-Family Units 2 enclosed parking spaces per unit; 1 space per nonresidential employee on the largest shift.

Townhome/Condominium 2 enclosed parking spaces per unit; 1 space per nonresidential employee on the largest shift; 1 guest space per 5 units.

Apartment 1 space for per bedroom; 1 space per nonresidential employee on the largest shift; 1 guest space per 5 units.

Independent Living Units
1 covered or enclosed parking space per unit; 1 parking space per nonresident employee on the largest shift; one guest space per 5 units.

Congregate Housing
One-half covered or enclosed space per unit; 1 parking space per nonresident employee on the largest shift; 1 guest space per 5 units; 1 space per 2 nonresident employees on the largest shift.

La Entrada Specific Plan
Single-Family/Residential 2 spaces per du covered or within a garage Attached/Multi-Family
Studio/1-bed 1 space per du, covered or within a garage 2+ beds 1 space per du, covered or within a garage

1.33 spaces per unit of open parking
Vista del Agua Specific Plan
R-1 4,000/5,000/6,000 2 garage spaces
Cluster Planning Development Area
2 spaces per unit, plus 1 non-exclusive space per unit to be located within 150 ft. of the cluster as measured from curb line at the intersection of the public street or private access-way and the shared drive. Minimum of 3 total spaces per unit.

Multi-Family Planning Area Private:

Page 657 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-15
Table C-4: Parking Rates for Residential Land Uses
Residential Use Required Number of Spaces
1-bed units - 1.75 spaces, including 1 space in a garage or carport
2-bed units - 2 spaces, including 1 space in a garage or carport 3-bed units - 2.5 spaces per unit, including 2 spaces in a garage or carport
Guest:
3 to 50 units - 1 space per 4 units
51 to 100 units - 1 space per 5 units
101+ units - 1 space per 6 units
Source: City of Coachella Zoning Ordinance; La Entrada Specific Plan, Vista del Agua Specific Plan Shared and Off-Site Parking: In addition to the standards in Table C-4, the Zoning Ordinance contains a section on shared and off-street parking, as a means of reducing the total number of required on-site parking spaces for different uses. Section 17.52.010.G (Shared and Off-Site Parking) dictates that shared or off-site parking can be allowed through a Conditional Use Permit approval, if the application complies with the following requirements:

1. A parking study addressing the potential peak parking demand and an actual parking survey of the parking facility under consideration shall be submitted.

2. Sufficient evidence shall be presented demonstrating that no substantial conflict in the principal hours or periods of peak demand for the structures or uses for which the joint use is proposed will exist.

3. Parties concerned in the use of shared or off-site parking facilities shall provide evidence of agreements for such use by a proper legal instrument, which shall be recorded in the office of the county recorder with two copies thereof filed with the planning division as a condition of any approval.

4. In no case shall the total parking reduction be allowed to exceed fifty (50) percent of the total parking for all uses combined.

5. Any off-site parking shall be located so that it will adequately serve the use for which it is intended, with safe and convenient access without unreasonable hazard to pedestrian, vehicular traffic, or traffic congestion, and shall not be detrimental to the use of any business, property or residential neighborhood in the vicinity.

Conclusion
Generally, the parking standards in Table C-4 present a constraint to the development of housing.

A point of clarity could be made regarding the fractional “open space per dwelling unit” applying to multi-family units. Multi-family units in other comparable jurisdictions tend to require an extra space or fraction dedicated for guest spaces or some other specified use. If the Zoning Ordinance is intentionally requiring 1.6 spaces per dwelling unit, without qualifying the open space for guests,

Page 658 ends

Item 27.

C-16 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
this requirement is generally more than most jurisdictions require and constrains the development of dense multi-family development. In addition, requiring 1.6 spaces for a studio dwelling unit will constrain the development of dense multi-family development, or affordable housing typologies whereas much parking is not needed. While the Zoning Ordinance does offer potential relief from parking requirements through shared and off-site parking, these can only be achieved in certain circumstances and require a Conditional Use Permit, even if the use is allowed by right. The Zoning Ordinance could provide more alternative parking reduction solutions such as lowering the requirement when providing bicycle parking, for affordable projects, or for projects near transit (see Program 5.3 to modify parking regulations).

Provisions for a Variety of Housing
The City has adopted provisions in its Zoning Ordinance that facilitate a range of residential development types. Table C-5 identifies the different housing types and how they are permitted in the main zones that allow for residential uses.

Table C-5: Housing Types Permitted by Base Zone
Housing Type
Base Zones

A-R A-T R-E R-S
R-0-
6000

R-M R-MH C-N SHO
Single-Family A A P P P P -- -- --
Duplex -- -- -- -- -- P -- -- --
Multi-Family -- -- -- -- C P -- C1
--
Accessory Living Quarters for
Employees A A -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Active Retirement/Independent
Living Community and Congregate
Housing Community
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- P
Boarding, Rooming, and Lodging
Houses -- -- -- -- C A -- -- --
Convalescent homes, Rest
Homes, and Sanitaria -- -- -- -- -- A -- -- --
Emergency Shelter -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Farmworker Housing C C -- -- C -- -- -- --
Guest Houses, Accessory Living
Quarters, and Servants Quarters -- -- A -- -- -- -- -- -- Manufactured Homes -- -- -- -- C -- -- -- --
Mobile Home Parks -- -- -- -- -- N P -- --
Secondary Housing Units (ADUs) -- -- -- A C -- -- -- -- SRO Unit -- -- -- -- N -- -- -- --
Supportive Housing A A P P C P P C1 P
Transitional Housing A A P P C P P C1 P

Page 659 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-17
Table C-5: Housing Types Permitted by Base Zone
Housing Type
Base Zones

A-R A-T R-E R-S
R-0-
6000

R-M R-MH C-N SHO
P = Permitted (Primary Use)
A = Permitted (Accessory Use)
C = Conditionally Permitted
N = Not Permitted
1 Limited to second story.

Source: City of Coachella Zoning Ordinance
Table C-6: Housing Types Permitted by Specific Plan Zone Vista Del Agua Specific Plan
La Entrada Specific Plan
Housing Type
Single-Family Multi-Family
R-1
4,000
R-1
5,000
R-1
6,000
Cluster MultiFamilyVLDR LDR MDR HDR MU
Single-Family P P P P -- P P P P P 1
Duplex -- -- -- -- -- -- -- P P P
Multi-Family -- -- -- P P -- -- -- P P
Live/Work -- -- -- -- -- -- -- C C --
Mobile Home Parks -- -- -- -- -- N N N N --
Secondary Housing Units
(ADUs) -- -- -- -- -- P P P -- --
Senior Housing Facilities -- -- -- -- P C C P P P
P = Permitted (Primary Use)
A = Permitted (Accessory Use)
C = Conditionally Permitted
N = Not Permitted
1 Townhomes only.

Source: Vista Del Agua Specific Plan, La Entrada Specific Plan Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs): The City’s Accessory Dwelling Unit standards were last updated in 2019 to comply with California Government Code §65852.2 and §65852.22. The City does not comply with the most recent State requirements for ADUs. The City must comply with new regulations. See Program 5.5 to reflect the new State law.

Emergency Shelters: Emergency shelters are allowed in the M-S Manufacturing Service Zone byright, without discretionary review. Outside of any Specific Plans, emergency shelters are only permitted in the M-S zone. Emergency shelters must comply with the following criteria:

Page 660 ends

Item 27.

C-18 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints

1. Emergency shelters shall be operated by a responsible agency or organization, with experience in managing or providing social services;

2. The shelter shall provide at least one qualified on-site supervisor at all times, plus one attendant for each fifty (50) occupants;

3. A shelter shall not be approved when another homeless shelter is existing within three hundred (300) feet of the proposed site;

4. Emergency shelters shall provide a setback of thirty (30) feet from the shelter building to any residential zone;

5. Parking shall be supplied at a ratio of one vehicle space per ten (10) beds, and one secured bicycle parking area designed to accommodate up to one bicycle per ten (10) beds;

6. Each shelter shall be limited to a maximum occupancy of fifty (50) persons, including warming shelters and daytime facilities; and

7. A management plan shall be required to address how the immediate sheltering needs of individuals who may be turned away from the shelter will be handled. The management plan shall establish a maximum length of time for which clients may be accommodated.

The above development standards, with the exception of the parking and separation requirements, comply with Government Code Section 65583(a)(4)(A), which requires that emergency shelters may only be subject to those development and management standards that apply to residential or commercial development within the same zone and certain, objective standards. Though setback requirements are not among the approved objective standards, all uses in the M-S zone are subject to a 30-foot setback where they abut a residential zone. The number of required parking spaces does not reflect the parking necessary to only accommodate shelter staff.

Therefore, these requirements will be amended to be consistent with state law, which requires sufficient parking for emergency shelter staff, provided that it is not more parking than is required for other residential or commercial uses within the same zone (Government Code §65583(a)(4)(A)). Furthermore, state law only allows a separation requirement of up to 300 feet between emergency shelters. A program has been included to amend the number of parking spaces require and separation requirement to be consistent with the state law (e.g., limitation of a maximum separation requirement of 300 feet) (Program 1.9).

Parcels in the M-S Manufacturing Service Zone are predominantly located along Grapefruit Blvd./Highway 111, with others located to the north along Interstate 10, to the east adjacent/south of 52nd Ave., and to the south on land owned by the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians west of Harrison St. There are a total of 86 M-S zoned parcels in the City, with an average lot size of 6.6 acres.

Page 661 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-19
Of these M-S parcels, 15 are vacant, with an average lot size of five acres, totaling 351.5 acres of vacant land in the M-S Zone. Four of these parcels are within a half-mile of transit, food, and medical service, including:
• APN 603-232-016 (3.8 acres) – Near City’s northern border along Avenue 48; features an existing occupiable building (29,180 sf) and for-sale as of May 2023 • APN 778-030-005 (14.5 acres) – Near Downtown, occupied by four industrial buildings leased to the Union Pacific Railroad
• APN 778-191-004 (7.92 acres) – Near Downtown, vacant
• APN 778-180-001 (2.57 acres) – Near Downtown, vacant
According to the 2023 Riverside County Homeless Point-in-Time (PIT) Count, there were an estimated 74 persons experiencing homelessness in Coachella, of which 67 were unsheltered (see Appendix A, Section A.3.5).The City conservatively assumes a rate of one bed per 600 square feet. Considering these assumptions, the 10.49 acres of vacant land near downtown could accommodate over 700 emergency shelter beds.

In addition, the City has hundreds of acres of vacant land in other zones that allow residential uses with access to amenities and services. Most specifically, there are 25.44 acres of land in the Downtown Center, which is applied in the core of the City, closest to the majority of City services and transit. Using a similarly conservative square footage estimate, the City has capacity on vacant parcels in the Downtown Core for over 1,800 beds. The table below outlines the vacant land capacity and corresponding General Plan designation. For more information on these sites, see Appendix B, Section B.3.3 (Housing Sites Table).

Table C-7: Vacant Land Area
Land Use Designation Vacant Land (Acres)
Downtown Center (DC) 25.44
General Neighborhood (GN) 343.79
Neighborhood Center (NC) 92.48
Suburban Neighborhood (SN) 57.49
Urban Employment Center (UE) 169.78
Urban Neighborhood (UN) 78.08
As indicated in Program 1.1 of the Housing Element, the City relies on the General Plan land use designations for the site inventory, as the General Plan land use designation is a more accurate and recent reflection of the land use policy across the City. AB 2339, among other things, requires cities to accommodate emergency shelters in zones which also allow residential development.

The City includes Program 1.14 to amend the Zoning Code to comply with AB 2339.

Farmworker Housing: The Zoning Ordinance does allow for farmworker housing, specifically designated as either “Farm labor camps” or “Facilities used for the purposes of providing shelter for migrant agricultural works” in the A-R, A-T, and R-O-6,000 zones by Conditional Use Permit.

Page 662 ends

Item 27.

C-20 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
Neither of these uses are defined in Chapter 17.06 (Definitions) to help further distinguish their use. The Zoning Ordinance has not been amended to comply with Health and Safety Code §17021.5 and §17021.6 which requires employee housing for six or fewer persons to be treated as a single-family structure and residential use in a residential zone and employee housing consisting of no more than 36 beds in group quarters designed for use by a single family or household to be treated as an agricultural use in a zone that allows agricultural activities. No conditional use permits, zoning variances, or other zoning clearance are to be required. As shown in Table A-10, 9.2 percent of Coachella workers are employed in farming, fishing, and forestry occupations in Coachella. Given the proximity to farmland located just outside City limits, there is a high demand for this residential housing type. The City proposes Programs 1.10 and 5.10 to facilitate housing for farmworkers.

Manufactured Homes and Mobile Home Parks:

The City does not have standards or requirements for manufactured homes on permanent foundations. To ensure manufactured homes are explicitly allowed in residential areas, as required by state law, the City proposes Program 5.7.

Chapter 17.52 (Mobilehome parks) provides supplemental standards for the development of mobile home parks in Coachella. Mobile home parks are subject to the following development standards:

1. Lot Requirements:
a. Minimum lot size: 5 acres.
b. Density: One mobilehome for each 4,500 sq. ft. of gross lot area. c. Lot width and depth shall be determined by the Planning Commission or City Council when the Conditional Use Permit is considered.

2. Yard Requirements:
a. Front Yard: 25 feet minimum.
b. Side Yard: 15 feet minimum.
c. Rear Yard: 15 feet minimum.

3. Requirements for Individual Mobilehome Sites within a Mobilehome Park:
a. Minimum individual site size shall be 3,000 sq. ft.
b. Each site shall have a minimum width of 35 feet.
c. Each mobilehome shall be set back at least five feet from the edge of any interior site roadway.

4. Height Limits:
a. Height limits shall be those in the zone in which a mobilehome park is authorized.

Page 663 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-21

5. Distance Between Buildings and Mobilehomes:
a. There shall be a minimum average distance between mobilehomes of twenty (20) feet; except that where placed end to end, the distance may be reduced by ten (10) feet.
b. There shall be a minimum distance between mobilehomes and accessory buildings of fifteen (15) feet.
c. There shall be a minimum distance between accessory buildings of ten (10) feet.

6. Useable Open Space:
a. A common recreational-leisure area shall be provided for each mobilehome park.

Such recreational-leisure area shall be for the purpose of providing usable open space for the residents of the mobilehome park and shall not be for the use of the general public.
b. The size of such recreational-leisure area shall be equal to at least four hundred (400) square feet for each mobilehome site. Cabanas, swimming pools, decks, game areas, and similar uses may be included in such an area.

Supplemental development standards for mobilehome parks are common in the region and the standards above do not constrain the development of mobilehome parks.

Mobilehomes in the A-R, A-T, and R-E Zones are subject to Architectural Review and compliance with the following:

1. All mobilehomes subject to this review process shall be certified under the National Mobilehome Construction and Safety Act of 1974; and permanent foundations shall be approved by the building official; and roof material. Roof overhang and exterior finish materials shall be the same as typically used on conventional single-family structures.;

2. All mobilehomes shall be compatible with surrounding development;

3. All mobilehomes subject to the same development standards that apply to a conventional single-family dwelling; and

4. All mobilehomes shall be allowed to be placed upon any lot of record. (A-T and A-R only) Multi-Family: Section 17.20.030 (Property development standards) contains standards that apply only to multi-family housing developments in the R-M zone. The development standards include lot size requirements, yard requirements, height limit, distance between buildings, and useable open space. Additionally, the Section requires minimum dwelling unit sizes for the following unit types:

1. Efficiency: 600 square feet

2. One-bedroom: 750 square feet

3. Two-bedroom: 900 square feet

Page 664 ends

Item 27.

C-22 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints

4. Each additional bedroom: 150 square feet
The three-story maximum building heights in the R-M zone coupled with large minimum unit sizes for efficiency and one-bedroom units presents a constrain the maximum potential density for a multi-family residential development. To address this, the City proposes Program 5.4 to remove unit size limitations.

Single Room Occupancy (SROs): A Single Room Occupancy unit is considered a small, affordable housing unit that can serve as an entry point into the housing market for people who previously experienced homelessness. The R-O 6000 overlay zone allows for “boardinghouses, transient occupancy facilities, and other such facilities needed for emergency housing”, subject to Conditional Use Permit approval. The R-M zone allows for boarding and lodging houses as an accessory use. Neither zone provides criteria to specify how these uses must be developed or procedures to encourage their development. The City must update the Zoning Ordinance to provide a more specific use definition for SROs and provide development standards and procedures to allow for their development in specific zones. See Program 5.9.

Supportive and Transitional Housing: Chapter 633 of Senate Bill 2 requires that supportive and transitional housing be permitted as a residential use, subject only to restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. The Zoning Ordinance does not mention Supportive and Transitional Housing as permitted uses in zones which allow residential dwellings. The lack of specific references to these required residential use types displays a deficiency in the Zoning Ordinance. The City must update the Zoning Ordinance to include Supportive and Transitional Housing as a residential use to avoid any potential impediments to their development. See Program 5.6.

Housing for Persons with Disabilities
The Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (§5115 and §5116) of the California Welfare and Institutions Code declares that mentally and physically disabled persons are entitled to live in normal residential surroundings. This classification includes facilities that are licensed by the State of California to provide permanent living accommodations and 24 hour primarily nonmedical care and supervision for persons in need of personal services, supervision, protection, or assistance for sustaining the activities of daily living. It includes hospices, nursing homes, convalescent facilities, and group homes for minors, persons with disabilities, and people in recovery from alcohol or drug addictions. The use of property as a licensed residential care facility for the care of six or fewer persons is considered a residential use that is permitted in all residential zones. No local agency can impose stricter zoning or building and safety standards on these homes than otherwise required for homes in the same district.

Persons with disabilities normally have a number of housing needs that include accessibility of dwelling units. Persons with disabilities normally have a number of housing needs that include accessibility of dwelling units, access to transportation, employment, and commercial services; and alternative living arrangements that include on-site or nearby supportive services. Title 24 of

Page 665 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-23
the California Code of Regulations ensures that new housing developments comply with and federal requirements for accessibility.

The City ensures that new housing developments comply with California building standards (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)) and federal requirements for accessibility. The City defines a family as "a person or persons living together as a single housekeeping unit in a residential building" which is not based on relationship of the household or the number of persons. The City's definition does not unnecessarily constrain living configurations conducive to persons with disabilities.

The Zoning Ordinance does not provide a specific use for Residential Care Facilities with associated thresholds for the amount of people allowed to live on-site. The Zoning Ordinance contains uses such as Convalescent homes, rest homes, and sanitaria, Congregate Housing Community, and Continuum of Care. While only two base zones and one zone within the Vista del Agua Specific Plan allow these types of uses, four out of the five zones within the La Entrada Specific Plan allow assisted living-type uses either permitted by-right or by Conditional Use Permit with no thresholds for distinction. The Zoning Ordinance does not explicitly reference housing for persons with disabilities beyond senior homes with assisted living accommodations. To address this constraint the City proposes Program 5.8 to update their regulations to accommodate for persons with disabilities, distinguish residential care use types, and allow for any residential care facility with 6 or fewer persons to be allowed by-right.

Reasonable Accommodation
The Zoning Ordinance does not currently have a Reasonable Accommodation policy which establishes a formal procedure for individuals with disabilities seeking equal access to housing.

The federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act prohibit discrimination against individuals with disabilities in housing and require that jurisdictions take affirmative action to eliminate regulations and procedures that deny housing opportunities to individuals with disabilities. Local jurisdictions must provide flexibility for individuals with disabilities or developers of housing for individuals with disabilities in the application of local zoning and building regulations and procedures. The City must update the Zoning Ordinance to include a Reasonable Accommodation policy and associated procedures.

See Program 4.2.

Incentives for Affordable Housing
Chapter 17.88 (Density Bonus and Development Incentives) covers the City’s Density Bonus provisions and incentives for the production of housing for very low income, low income, moderate income, and senior households.

In addition to the eligible density bonus percentage, an applicant may request one or more incentives or concessions in connection with its application for a density bonus. Section

17.88.040 (Number and types of density bonus and development incentives) lists the following available incentives and concessions:

Page 666 ends

Item 27.

C-24 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints

1. A reduction in the site development standards or a modification of zoning code requirements or architectural design requirements that exceed the minimum building standards approved by the California Building Standards Commission as provided in Part

2.5 Section 18907 of Division 13 of Health and Safety Code, including, but not limited to, a reduction in setback and square footage requirements and in ratio of vehicle parking spaces that would otherwise be required and that results in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions;

2. Approval of mixed-use development in conjunction with the housing development if the nonresidential land uses will reduce the cost of the housing development and the nonresidential land uses are compatible with the housing development and surrounding development;

3. Other regulatory incentives or concessions proposed by the application or that the city determines will result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions; and

4. Priority processing of a housing development that provides income-restricted units.

Additional incentives are offered for dedication of land, provision of childcare facilities, or preservation of affordable units in event of a condo conversion. These provisions for affordable housing bonuses and concessions were adopted during in 2013. There have been changes to State density bonus laws since 2013 (e.g., allowance for up to 50 percent density bonus). The City proposes Program 6.4 to update Chapter 17.88 to reflect current State law.

Replacement Policies
The City does not have a condominium conversion ordinance. Section 17.88.040.F (Condominium Conversion Incentives for Low-Income Housing Development) allows for additional 25 percent density bonus, If the developer of a conversion project agrees to:

1. Provide at least thirty-three (33) percent of the total units of the proposed condominium project to persons and families of low or moderate income; or

2. Provide at least fifteen (15) percent of the total units of the proposed condominium project to lower income households; and

3. Agree to pay for the reasonably necessary administrative costs incurred by the city.

Inclusionary Housing
The Zoning Ordinance does not currently have an inclusionary housing policy or ordinance.

Short-Term Rentals
The City does not have a short-term rental (STR) ordinance to control or regulate the use of residential properties for temporary rental. The City does prohibit the use of ADUs or JADUs from rental periods shorter than 30 days. The City has not observed a reduction in the availability or affordability of housing resulting from short-term rentals.

Page 667 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-25
C.2.3 Building and Housing Codes and Enforcement
City Building Code
The City of Coachella adopted the 2019 California Building Code (CBC), including Chapters 2 through 35, and Appendix C, G, H, I, and J as adopted by the State of California, based on the 2018 International Building Code as published by the International Code Council. In addition, the City amended portions of the CBC relating to automatic sprinkler systems, cement types, grading, soils, and drainage devices.

Code Enforcement
The City’s Code Enforcement Division enforces the City Code on a complaint basis and investigates violations of city ordinances regulating public health, buildings standards, and land use, among others. The Housing Element includes Policies B.d and B.e, as well as Programs 2.1,

2.2, and 2.4, to help maintain Code-compliant housing conditions.

C.2.4 Permits and Procedures
Permits and Procedures
The time required to process a project varies greatly from one entitlement to another and is directly related to the size and complexity of the proposal, as well as the number of actions or approvals needed to complete the process. Table C-8 identifies approvals and/or permits that could be required for planning entitlements along with their corresponding approval body.

Table C-8: Review Authority
Permit/Approval Approval Authority
Architectural Review Planning Director/ Planning
Commission/ City Council
Minor Modification Planning Director
Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission
General Plan Amendment City Council
Variance Planning Commission
Zone Change City Council
Zoning Text Amendment City Council
Specific Plan City Council
CEQA Negative Declaration Planning Commission or City
Council
Environmental Impact
Report
Planning Commission or City
Council

Page 668 ends

Item 27.

C-26 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
The development review and permitting process is administered by the Development Services Department, including both the Planning Division and Building Division. A typical single-family development must submit a planning application, accompanied by a site plan and building plan sets, which is then reviewed and decision is made by the Planning Commission at a public hearing.

Affordable housing projects would be considered for administrative review. Multi-family development of more than three dwelling units is subject to architectural review, approved by the Planning Commission, which makes a decision after conducting a public hearing. Affordable projects consistent with the zoning code and General Plan would be processed administratively.

Developments of four or more dwelling units are subject to an additional pre-application review process. SB-35 eligible affordable projects are handled administratively at the City of Coachella and no hearings are required. Any residential development projects that involve a Tentative Tract Map, Change of Zone, and/or General Plan requires both Planning Commission and City Council.

Due to the Zoning Map and General Plan inconsistency many development projects require a Zone Change as well. Multi-family projects typically require two public hearings prior to approval, with additional hearings required for projects subject to a CUP or requesting a Variance. The inconsistency between the Zoning Code regulations and the General Plan vision contributes to a lengthier and more uncertain review process. The Housing Element includes programs to align the Code with the General Plan which will clarify the entitlement process and reduce the need for rezonings as part of project approval.

The time lapse between project approval and building permit issuance varies and depends on both staff review times as well as when the applicant submits the permit application following entitlement. Staff does not control the timing of application submittal relative to project entitlement.

In 2020, the City issued building permits for 158 new single family housing units, as part of the Valencia and Escondida Pointe projects. For those projects, the City has observed a lapse of approximately 10.5 months between project entitlement approval and building permit issuance, with some permits issued in as little as 4.5 months. These projects provide both market rate above moderate-income housing for ownership. Also issued building permits in 2020 was the 104-unit deed-restricted affordable project, Pueblo Viejo Villas. The project was entitled in 2017 and permits were issued three years later in 2020.Architecture Review: Chapter 17.72 (Architecture Review) establishes the intent, process, and requirements for the architectural review process.

The stated intent of the process is to determine whether a proposed development will properly comply with the architectural guidelines of the City and the provisions and development standards required by this chapter or as prescribed by the planning director, or other authorized agent. The submission of a site plan is required to conduct an architectural review. The chapter establishes thresholds for approval by the Planning Director or the Planning Commission. The Planning Director is the approving authority for developments of three units or less and projects that involve 500 square feet of new multifamily residential square footage. The Planning Commission is the approval authority for any residential project involving more than three dwelling units.

Page 669 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-27
Development in the A-R, A-T, R-E, R-M, C-N, and SHO zones are subject to the architectural review process as follows:

A-R Zone- Mobilehomes (subject to special criteria)
A-T Zone- Single Family and Mobilehomes (subject to special criteria) R-E Zone- All development (mobilehomes subject to special criteria) R-S Zone- >3 units Planning Commission approval 1-3 units Director approval R-M Zone- All development
Architectural review is required for all new development in the A-T, R-M, C-N, and SHO zones.

Mobilehomes require architectural review in the A-R, A-T, R-E zones, and must comply with specific criteria. No specific architectural design criteria are mentioned for the R-M, C-N, and SHO zones or for single-family developments in the A-T zone. Besides the architectural review process, development in the City is not subject to any other design review guidelines which may impact housing supply and affordability.

Conditional Uses: Chapter 17.74 (Conditional Uses) establishes the process and procedures for any uses that require a Conditional Use Permit for approval. The Planning Commission is the review and approval authority on all Conditional Use Permit applications, each determination is required to meet the following findings:

1. The proposed use will not be in conflict with, but will be in harmony with and in accordance with the objectives of the general plan;

2. The proposed use will be located, designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and shall not change the essential character of the same area;

3. Consideration is to be given to harmony in scale, bulk, coverage and density, to the availability of public facilities and utilities, to harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character, to the generation of traffic and the capacity of surrounding streets, and to any other relevant impact of the development;

4. Where the proposed use may be potentially hazardous or disturbing to existing or reasonably expected neighboring uses, it must be justified by the common public interest as a benefit to the community as a whole; and

5. The proposed use will include vehicular approaches to the property designed for reasonable minimal interference with traffic on surrounding public streets or roads.

The Planning Commission has the discretion to attach conditions of approval to an application.

Section 17.74.020.C lists 15 potential conditions that could be applied to an approval. The conditions listed below provide an example of the types of conditions that could be applied to a residential project:

1. Requirement of yards other than the minimum size required by this chapter;

Page 670 ends

Item 27.

C-28 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints

2. Modification of the exterior features or appearance of any structure where necessary to preserve property values;

3. Requirement of screening of parking, recreation or storage areas or other portions of the subject property from adjoining premises or from any street by walls, fences, planting or other devices;

4. Control of location, number, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of signs and structures as related to creation of traffic hazards and appearance in harmony with surrounding development and community objectives; and

5. Requirement of off-street parking or other special features other than the minimum required by this chapter or applicable codes or regulations. (Note: Allows less than minimum as well as greater than.)
Minor Modifications: Section 17.70.120 (Minor modification) establishes the process which allows for relief from developments standards when the deviation does not create an adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The Planning Director may allow for modifications of the follow standards:

1. Reduction of minimum lot area and/or dimensions, by not more than twelve (12) percent for up to twenty (20) percent of the lots in a subdivision. However, such modifications are not permitted for lot area in the R-O 6000 zone, and the dwelling unit on such a lot shall meet all setback and coverage requirements.

2. Reduction in front, side, or rear yard setback by not greater than ten percent of coderequired minimum.

3. Increase in fence height not greater than ten percent above code required maximum.

4. Reduction in required off-street parking, by not greater than five percent of code-required minimum.

5. Increase in building height not greater than five percent above code-required maximum

6. Modification of allowable sign area not greater than ten percent above code-required maximum.

7. Modification of allowable paving and hardscape in the front yard of residential zones not greater than ten percent above code-required maximum.

8. Modification of allowable side of accessory structure not greater than ten percent above code-required maximum and minimum distance between accessory structures and other buildings not greater than ten percent of code-required minimum, in the residential zones.

The planning director must render a decision within 60 days from receipt of a complete application.

The director has the discretion to deny, approve, or approve the minor modification with conditions to protect the surrounding area.

Page 671 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-29
Pre-Application Review: Chapter 17.77 provides the process for a pre-application review of a proposed development. The City Manager appoints a case manager for the project from a relevant department (e.g., Planning, Economic Development, Public Works etc.) which interfaces with the applicant and involved agencies. The Chapter explicitly states that the pre-application meeting and any information provided during the meeting is not a city recommendation for approval or disapproval of the application. A pre-application meeting is required for the following housing-related applications:

1. Projects involving a specific plan adoption, specific plan amendment, or planned development overlay;

2. Projects involving a general plan amendment, or change of zone;

3. Projects involving four or more dwelling units;

4. New construction of more than 500 square feet of building area within the boundaries of the Pueblo Viejo Master Plan;

5. New construction located within the boundaries of an adopted specific plan, if review is required by the director;

6. Subdivisions of land involving five or more lots.

The Planning Director reserves the right to require a pre-application review for any project involving multi-agency coordination and discretionary land use entitlements, where proposed land uses have the potential to cause adverse impacts upon surrounding property owners.

While the four specific procedures described above are clearly described within their respective chapters/sections, the Zoning Ordinance does not present objective criteria to evaluate a project for compliance with the Architecture Review and Conditional Use processes without clear findings.

An architectural review process with no objective criteria presents uncertainty for an applicant and likely leads to a protracted approval process which may result in delays in approval, added cost to the entitlement process, and uncertainty for prospective developers. Additionally, residential uses do not have specific criteria and conditions listed in the Conditional Use chapter. The list of potential conditions gives the Planning Commission wide-ranging discretion on how to condition certain projects for approval. The subjectivity throughout the approval processes presents a constraint to the development of housing. To reduce the potential constraint in the development review process, the Housing Element includes Program 5.12.

Permit and Development Fees
Table C-9 details the City’s processing fees for all planning entitlements. One or more of the entitlements would be required to process a residential project.

Page 672 ends

Item 27.

C-30 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
Table C-9: Development Service Fees
Development Service Fee
General Plan Map Amendment $3,857 + $10/ac
General Plan Text Amendment $5,035 + cost of report
Specific Plan – Initial Draft – Processing only $5,976 + $10/ac Final Specific Plan – Submittal $3,857 + $5/ac + $5/unit Specific Plan Amendment $3,857.00
Zoning Map Amendments $5,976 + $10/ac
Zoning Text Amendments (Minor/Major) $2,679/$4,798 + cost of report Conditional Use Permit – Residential $3,857 + $10/ac + $5/unit Conditional Use Permit – Mobilehome Park $3,857 + $10/ac Conditional Use Permit – Recreational Vehicle Park $3,857 + $10/ac Conditional Use Permit – Planned Unit Development $3,857 + $10/ac + $5/unit Variance $2,679
Variance – Setbacks $1,714
Architectural Review – Single Family (1-4 units) $3,857 + $10/ac + $5/unit Architectural Review – Single Family (5+ units) $3,857 + $10/ac + $5/unit Architectural Review – Multi-Family (2-6 units) $3,857 + $10/ac + $5/unit Architectural Review – Multi-Family (7+ units) $3,857 + $10/ac + $5/unit Architectural Review – Second Unit on SF lot $2,305
Subdivision Ordinance Amendment $3,857
Tentative Maps – Single Family Tract $3,857 + $10/ac + $5/unit Tentative Maps – Multi-Family Condominium Tract
(Airspace)
$3,857 + $10/ac + $5/unit
Tentative Maps – Multi-Family Condominium Tract
(Townhomes type)
$3,857 + $10/ac + $5/unit
Tentative Parcel Map $3,857
Zoning Overlay District $3,857
Parcel Merger (2 to 4 lots) $2,679 + $100/lot + $25/ac
Development Agreement $9,998 Deposit (Actual Cost)
Modifications – Architecture Review $2,679
Modifications – Conditional Use Permit $2,679
Modifications – Specific Plan $2,679 + $5/ac + $5/unit
Modifications – Development Agreement $1,340 Deposit (Actual Cost) Time Extension – Architectural Review/CUP/Variance $1,125 Administrative Review & Approvals $250
Environmental Review – Categorical Exemption $541
Environmental Review – Initial Study
(Preparation/Review)
$4,780/$2,118

Page 673 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-31
Table C-9: Development Service Fees
Development Service Fee
Environmental Review – Negative Declaration $1,153
Environmental Review – Notice of Determination $1,153
Environmental Review – Environmental Impact Report
(Preparation/Review)
$10,000 Deposit (Actual Cost)/$5,000
Environmental Review – EIR Notice of Preparation $1,153 Environmental Review – MMP (Preparation/Plan Review) $2,500/$2,500 Environmental Review – MMP Notice of Preparation $1,153 Annexation/Detachment/SOI Amendments $6,213
Pre-Application Review $334
Appeal of Staff Decision to PC $1,880
Appeal of PC Decision to CC $2,539
Source: City of Coachella, Development Services – Fees, January 2014 Impact Fees
Table C-10 details the impact fees dependent on residential use type. The City’s impact fee schedule contains fees for single family and multi-family on a per-unit basis.

Table C-10: Impact Fees
Impact Fee Type Single-Family (per unit) Multi-Family (per unit) General Government $2,357.61 $1,980.39
Fire $1,750.03 $1,470.02
Police $306.52 $257.48
Park Improvements $6,480.35 $544.49
Park Land $1,377.00 $1,134.68
Library $577.88 $485.42
Streets and Transportation $2,685.98 $1,390.95
Art in Public Places1.25% x valuation .25% x valuation
TUMF1 $1,837.44 $1,276.80
Multi-Species $1,245.002 $518.002
Note:
1 Affordable Housing is exempted from TUMF and Art in Public Places fees. 2 0-8 Units per acre: $1,245.00; 8.1-14 units per acre: $518.00; More than 14 units per acre: $228.00.

Source: City of Coachella, Development Impact Fees 2017 The impact fees in Table C-10 display the cost of a single-family unit totaling $17,372.81 and a multi-family unit totaling $8,540.23, not including the Multi-Species and Art in Public Places impact

Page 674 ends

Item 27.

C-32 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
fees. These totals show that the impact fees for multi-family units are approximately half the cost of a single-family unit. The impact fees do not present a constraint to the development of multifamily housing.

Streamlined Approvals
California Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”), codified at Government Code Section 65913.41, became effective January 1, 2018.The intent of SB 35 is to expedite and facilitate construction of affordable housing. SB 35 requires cities and counties that have not made sufficient progress toward meeting their affordable housing goals for above-moderate and lower income levels to streamline the review and approval of certain qualifying affordable housing projects through a ministerial process. The City complies with state requirements of SB 35 as part of project review as projects are proposed. To ensure continued compliance facilitate this process the City proposes Program 6.7 to adopt local procedures consistent with SB 35.

Transparency
The City complies with all transparency laws and posts on the City website the zoning code, schedule of fees, exactions, and affordability requirements that would apply to a proposed housing development project.

C.2.5 On and Off-site Improvements
Chapter 16.28 (Improvements and Grading), within Title 16 - Subdivisions, specifies the required improvements for subdivisions. Required improvements include:

1. Grading, curbs, and gutter, paving and drainage structures necessary for the proper use and drainage of the development, streets, highways and/or public safety;

2. Site grading and drainage, taking into consideration the drainage pattern of adjacent improved or unimproved property and making drainage provisions adequate for total ultimate development of the natural tributary area.

3. Street name and traffic control signs;

4. Sidewalks and bicycle paths;

5. Fire hydrants and a water system with mains of sufficient size and capacity to provide future extensions to adjacent property;

6. Sanitary sewer facilities and connections for each lot;

7. Street trees as required by the director;

8. Provision shall be made for any and all railroad crossings necessary to provide access to or circulation within the proposed subdivision, including the preparation of all documents necessary for application to the state public utilities commission for the establishment and improvement of such crossings;

Page 675 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-33

9. Midblock pedestrian ways, where required;

10. Improvements on private access easements shall be required as determined by the city engineer;

11. Street lighting facilities shall be provided in accordance with the council's policy for the area of the city where the subdivision is located. Lighting shall be adequate to permit proper policing of the subdivision and shall be so screened or otherwise designed as not to interfere with views from the hillsides of the city;

12. All utility distribution lines including, but not limited to electric, communication, natural gas, and cable television lines installed in and for the purpose of supplying service to any subdivision shall be placed underground. Undergrounding shall include existing aboveground facilities located within the subdivision and extending to the first existing pole outside the subdivision;

13. Traffic signals in an amount proportionate to the benefits received according to rules and regulations as may be adopted from time to time by the council.

While improvements such as curbs, gutters, drainage, and street trees are typical of jurisdictions in the region, the requirement of traffic signals, bicycle paths, and undergrounding all utility lines may increase the cost associated with new residential subdivisions due to the added costs of these improvements. However; these improvements are intended to ensure new projects provide appropriate amenities for future residents and should not be removed.

Section C.3 Non-Governmental Constraints
Market factors over which a local government has only limited ability to control can influence the jurisdiction’s capacity to develop more housing. These market-related constraints include land cost, construction cost, and the availability of financing. An assessment of these nongovernmental constraints can inform the development of potential actions that can ameliorate its impact.

C.3.1 Housing Supply/Conditions
Market Overview: For-Sale
As shown in the Needs Assessment (Appendix A, Figure A-23), the financial crisis of 2007/2008 and the ensuing Great Recession caused home values in Coachella to drop 64 percent from 2006 to 2011. As of 2018, Coachella home values have not rebounded to their pre-Recession levels.

In 2018, the median sales value for a single-family home in Coachella was $245,000, compared to $200,000 in 2008 (23 percent increase). While Coachella median home sales price is 43% of the sales price in the SCAG region, the City and region price trends remain consistent over time.

Page 676 ends

Item 27.

C-34 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
Since the beginning of the recovery from the Great Recession in 2013, interest rates have been maintained at low levels of 3.5 to 4.5 percent. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, however, national 30-year mortgage rates have dropped to historically low levels, declining to 2.7 percent in late 2020. When interest rates are low, capital investment and housing production generally increase, and more people are likely to take out a mortgage than when interest rates are higher. In addition, consumers are able to borrow more money for the same monthly payment. Extremely low interest rates are one of the factors that has led to overall increased home values in Coachella above what has been seen in the past several years. Coupled with the general desire during the pandemic to move from denser to more spacious neighborhoods, the housing market will likely continue to be competitive in the near future.

Market Overview: Rental
As shown in the Needs Assessment (Appendix A, Figure A-24), Coachella rents are about twothirds that of rents in Riverside County. The median rent paid in Coachella in 2019 was $879.

Over the past 10 years, rents in Coachella have increased six percent while rents in Riverside County have increased 23 percent.

Per the Needs Assessment (Appendix A, Figure A-27), the most common rent category across all Coachella renters is $500 to $1,000 per month, which represents 53 percent of renters. Rent categories range from less than $500 per month (9.1 percent of Coachella renters) to more than $2,000 per month (0.9 percent of Coachella renters). While lower-income households spend a larger proportion of their income on rent, they generally spend less on rent overall.

C.3.2 Development Costs
Land Costs
Land cost was estimated through a review of vacant land sale transactions within the past year (2020 and 2021). Land in Coachella is estimated to cost an average of $17 per square foot (PSF), or about $735,000 per acre. Individual lots ranged from $5 to $42 PSF, or about $214,000 to $1,830,000 per acre. These lots ranged in sizes from 5,000 to 38,000 square feet.

Land is not considered a constraint to development, as there is availability of vacant land for future housing construction.

Construction Costs
According to a March 2020 report published by the Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, construction costs for multifamily housing in California have climbed 25 percent between 2009 and 2018. This increase is in part due to the higher cost of building materials, such as wood, concrete, and steel, as well as prevailing wage requirements. According to RSMeans, construction costs (including materials and labor but excluding soft costs such as fees) for a small apartment complex in the Coachella area ranged between $144 to $169 per square foot in the first quarter of 2021. Construction costs can vary depending on the type of development, ranging

Page 677 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-35
from more expensive steel-frame Type I construction to more affordable wood-frame Type V. Due to the smaller scale, single family homes tend to be more expensive to construct on a per square foot basis than multi-family. This cost can fluctuate depending on the type and quality of amenities to the property, such as expensive interior finishes, fireplace, swimming pool, etc.

Soft costs are the costs that are not directly incurred by the physical construction of the development. These costs include services for architectural, consultant, and legal services, as well as permitting requirements and impact fees. They generally range from 15 to 30 percent of total development costs but can fluctuate depending on local fees and exactions. Please refer to the Permit and Development Fees section, above, for a discussion of the City’s required permit and development fees.

C.3.3 Availability of Financing
The availability of financing can impact rates of homeownership. The ability to secure financing can be influenced by several factors, including creditworthiness, debt-to-income ratio, and the restrictiveness of mortgage lending standards. Reviewing data collected through the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) can reveal the role the lending market has had on local home sales. Home purchase loans in 2019 are summarized in the table below.

There was a total of about 340 loan applications for either government-backed or conventional loans in Coachella in 2019. The approval rate for both types of loans was about 70 percent.

However, driven by continued low mortgage interest rates, there were 449 applications for refinancing. These applications had a lower rate of approval at 49 percent.

In competitive housing environments when purchasing a new home may be out of reach for some, home renovations can be a desirable and more affordable way to add value to property. There were 65 home improvement applications in 2019. The approval rate for these types of applications was only 28 percent.

Table C-11: Total Home Loan Applications
Type Total Applications
Government-backed 188
Conventional 151
Refinancing 449
Home Improvement 65
5+ Units 2
Non-occupant 54
Source: HMDA, 2019

Page 678 ends

Item 27.

C-36 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
Figure C-1: Home Loan Application Disposition
Source: HMDA, 2019
C.3.4 Summary
Lower for-sale prices and rental rates have tempered large-scale market-rate housing production in Coachella. The city is still recovering from the housing shock of the 2008 Recession, though is currently experiencing a fair level of demand for single-family homes due to their relative affordability compared to the region, as well as the appeal of more open space during the COVID19 pandemic. Lower land costs have facilitated the development of affordable housing projects throughout the city, most of which are developed through partnerships with local non-profit housing providers. Most of the new construction is expected to be for lower-income households while market-rate housing projects are less common. Lower housing costs in Coachella have resulted in greater proportion of residents who own their own home rather than need to rent. The affordable development is crucial to the City, however, as those who do rent experience a much higher rate of housing cost-burden than the region overall.

While market conditions are not the main constraint to housing development in Coachella, market conditions may shift during the next eight years. In order to encourage housing development, the Housing Element includes programs to streamline approvals, as project delays can increase economic costs, as well as review fees to ensure they are not a constraint to development. 74% 70%
49%
28%
100%
65%
9% 10% 21%
62%
0%
18% 21% 15%
30%
11% 0%
20%
Government-backed Conventional Refinancings Home Improvement 5+ Units Non-occupant % Approved % Denied % Withdrawn or Incomplete

Page 679 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-37
Section C.4 Environmental and Infrastructure
Constraints
C.4.1 Environmental Constraints
The City of Coachella is a largely underdeveloped desert community located at the eastern end of the Coachella Valley. The Valley is flanked by the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains on the west and the Little San Bernardino Mountains on the east. The Coachella Valley generally slopes to the southeast towards the Salton Sea.

The City certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a General Plan Update in February 2015 (EIR SCH No. 2009021007). The General Plan EIR analyzed the impacts of the General Plan policies and objectives. Per the EIR, there are no environmental constraints related to hazardous materials and soil that would impede the development of housing at the capacities identified in the sites inventory and analysis. Additional analysis will be required if there is future rezoning to development standards above those outlined in the General Plan Update.

C.4.2 Infrastructure Constraints
Drainage
The dominant drainage/surface water feature in the Coachella Valley is the Whitewater River. The Whitewater River watershed is primarily in Riverside County within the Coachella Valley Planning Area of the Colorado River Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Regional drainage and flood control in the Planning Area are managed primarily by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The CVWD boundaries cover most of the Coachella Valley from the San Gorgonio Pass to the Salton Sea. The CVWD also maintains an extensive system of agricultural tile drains throughout the Coachella area. The tile drain system is designed with two primary functions. First, the tile drains return excess irrigation water to the Coachella Valley storm water channel, and second, they artificially lower Coachella’s otherwise high water table, protecting crops from inundations.

Channel and levee improvements have been made along most of the Whitewater River channel, limiting the 100-year flood zone primarily within the banks of the channel. The East Side Dike is designed to protect the Coachella branch of the All-American Canal, which passes through the northeastern part of the city. The Bureau of Reclamation provided funds for the East Side Dyke in the 1940’s, which was constructed with a series of detention basins to protect the canal from mountain runoff. The flow is directed into diversion channels which convey the runoff to the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel.

Page 680 ends

Item 27.

C-38 | City of Coachella Housing Constraints
Water
The City of Coachella’s Coachella Water Authority (CWA) is the water supplier for the entire City service area. As a public water supplier in the Coachella Valley, the City maintains a close and cooperative relationship with Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The CVWD is a multifaceted agency that delivers irrigation and domestic water (including drinking water), collects and recycles wastewater, provides regional storm water protection, replenishes the groundwater basin and promotes water conservation. The demands associated with the General Plan Update have mostly been accounted for as part of CVWD’s regional water supply planning efforts, which specifically include population projections within the City and its SOI through the year 2045.

In September 2009, CVWD and the City signed a Memorandum of Understanding (2009 MOU) to assist in ensuring a sufficient and reliable water supply for development projects within the City in a manner consistent with CVWD’s Water Management Plan as amended from time to time.

Under the terms of the 2009 MOU, various means are identified by which the City can provide for the supply of supplemental water to offset the demands associated with development projects approved by the City. For instance, under the 2009 MOU the City can participate in funding CVWD’s acquisition of supplemental water supplies to offset demands associated with newly approved projects within the City’s SOI. In February 2013, CVWD and the City signed a Memorandum of Understanding (2013 MOU) regarding implementation of the 2009 MOU. Among other things, the 2013 MOU further specifies the mechanism by which the City can finance and acquire supplemental water supplies from CVWD to meet the projected demands of new development projects, including the 6th Cycle RHNA, and establishes a process for preparing and adopting Water Supply Assessments and Written Verifications for such projects.

Sewer
The City’s wastewater treatment facilities are managed by the Coachella Sanitary District and are under the Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRBRWQCB). In order for wastewater treatment facilities to be in operation, they must comply with all requirements of the CRBRWQCB with annual reporting to monitor treatment practices. This regulatory framework ensures that wastewater treatment facilities that will be used to service the development under the City’s General Plan Update, including total capacity to accommodate the RHNA, and will comply with wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. In addition to the regulatory system, policies proposed in the General Plan Update require that adequate wastewater treatment capacity exist or be online before new development can be completed. Ensuring this additional capacity is in place prior to the occupation of new development would prevent plant overdemand and overflows of untreated wastewater into local waterways, preventing the exceedance of any requirements for treatment of wastewater and the associated environmental impacts associated with such. In the event that a wastewater treatment facility exceeds applicable requirements, new development will have to ensure a wastewater treatment facility that can handle the growth from new development before construction, either through the upgrades of additional facilities or the construction of new facilities. Understanding

Page 681 ends

Item 27.

Housing Constraints City of Coachella | C-39
this constraint, the City proposes Program 2.6 to consider requiring developers to plan for and construct oversize infrastructure improvements to build capacity for new growth. This program will particularly address the needs of Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities (DUCs) in the City’s sphere of influence, which often experience poor access to services and resources and limited or no infrastructure improvements. However, the cost of infrastructure investment in undeveloped areas of the city in and of itself poses a constraint to future housing development.

Page 682 ends

Item 27.

Page 683 ends

Item 27.

Existing Programs Review City of Coachella | D-1
Appendix D:Existing Programs Review
Contents
Appendix D: Existing Programs Review................................................. D-1 Section D.1 Existing Housing Programs Review .................................................................. D-2

Page 684 ends

Item 27.

D- 2 | City of Coachella Existing Programs Review
Section D.1 Existing Housing Programs Review
This Appendix documents the implementation status of the current Housing Element programs. The main purpose is to evaluate which programs were successful and should be continued, and which programs were ineffective and should be eliminated or modified.

The City’s focus during the 5th cycle was to complete the 4th and 5th Cycle shortfall rezonings to ensure there was adequate capacity for housing development. The City completed the 4th Cycle rezoning program in 2019, by adopting ordinance no. 1143, which rezoned portions of “Zona Central” to RM-Urban and RM- General for capacity of 1,916 units for lower-income units. In 2021 the City completed two separate rezoning projects to with realistic unit potential of 2,781 in new RM- Urban and RM- General zones. In addition, the City has actively worked with for profit and non-profit developers to entitle a variety of market rate and affordable projects. Market rate products include three-bedroom single-family products at Valencia at Coachella, Escondida Pointe, Sevilla, and Coachella 155. In 2020, the City approved Pueblo Viejo Villas, a mixed-use project with one and two-bedroom units restricted to households earning 30-60% AMI, and is affordable to low-income households. The project was funded through a variety of sources, including low-income housing tax credit equity, California Affordable Housing and Sustainable Community (AHSC) program, HOME funds and vouchers, and Infill Infrastructure Grant from HCD. This is the first project in the Coachella valley to utilize cap-and-trade funding. Coachella Valley Apartments was approved in 2020. Proposed by nonprofit Community Housing Opportunities Corporation (CHOC) and funded through sources including Joe Serna Farmworker Grant program, Coachella CFD loan, the project includes 50 replacement units and 60 new one, two, and three-bedroom units over two phases.

Affordable housing production benefits lower-income household groups, as well as special needs populations (such as female-headed households and senior households) because these households are also typically more affected by affordability issues due to limited and/or fixed incomes. As noted below, the City has worked throughout the 5
th Cycle to coordinate with non-profit developers to secure funding for housing for other special needs groups. The City will continue these programs in the 6 th Cycle and has
proposed additional programs this Cycle to facilitate housing for farmworkers and persons experiencing homelessness.

Page 685 ends

Item 27.

Existing Programs Review City of Coachella | D-3
Table D-1: Existing Housing Element Programs Review
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue
Goal 1: Adequate Housing. Adequate housing in the city by location, price, type, and tenure, especially for those of lower income and households with special needs.

1.1 The City will adopt the updated General Plan Land Use Element to provide for a wide range of housing opportunities, suitable for residents of all income levels. Following General Plan adoption, the City will conduct a study that analyzes changes needed to the Zoning Code to implement the new General Plan and will then complete a comprehensive Zoning Code update. Once the City's General Plan and Zoning Code are adopted, the City's standards will:
• Provide adequate, suitable sites for the construction of new housing, reflecting a variety of housing types and densities; • Explore and establish mechanisms such as incentives and funding to promote and preserve housing affordability in targeted growth areas;
• Meet the requirements of state housing law;
• Facilitate housing in a variety of neighborhood styles; • Allow mixed-use residential development; and
• Ensure the compatibility of residential areas with surrounding commercial and other nonresidential uses.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department (Note:

Community Development
Department (CDD) is now the
Development Services
Department (DSD). All
references to CDD shall be
implied to mean DSD)
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: General Plan
update adopted in early
2014, Compatibility Study
completed by 2014, Zoning
Code updated by 2015,
Examine potential affordable
housing incentives annually
or as needed when projects
are proposed, establish
incentives in conjunction with
the Zoning Code update by
2015.

The City has adopted
the updated General
Plan and has
completed some
Code amendments
but has not fully
implemented the
General Plan (not
completed the Zoning
Code update).

Modify - Update this
program to include
the Zoning Code
update only.

1.2 Continue to utilize environmental and other development review procedures to ensure that all new residential developments are provided with adequate public and private facilities and services. Require documentation of the adequate services and facilities that are or will be provided as a condition of approval.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: Ongoing,
2014–2021
The City ensures
projects are reviewed
by City departments
and external agencies
that provide public
and private facilities
and services for
comments and
conditions of
approval. The
provisions of
adequate services is
also requires as part
Continue.

Page 686 ends

Item 27.

D-4 | City of Coachella Existing Programs Review
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue
of the environmental
checklist.

1.3 While the new General Plan standards will create ample opportunity for higher-density housing appropriate to meet the lower-income RHNA for the 2008–2014 and 2014 – 2022 planning periods, zoning standards are not yet in place to facilitate development at planned General Plan densities.

Thus, as part of the planned Zoning Code update, the City will ensure that the new zoning standards facilitate housing development at new General Plan densities to accommodate the remaining 2008–2014 RHNA of 1,916 units and the remaining 2014–2022 RHNA of 2,542 lower-income units.

Potential rezone sites are listed in Table B-49. It is anticipated that sites rezoned to meet this remaining RHNA will be those located in the Urban Neighborhood and Urban Employment land use areas, which have planned minimum densities of 20 and 30 units per acre, respectively.

The City will ensure that sites made available through zoning changes to meet the Coachella’s remaining 2008–2014 RHNA and remaining 2014– 2021 lower-income RHNA meet the following criteria:
• Require a minimum density of 20 units per acre
• Be of adequate size to accommodate at least 16 units per site • Allow multi-family residential development “by right” (without discretionary review)
• At least 50 percent of sites will allow residential uses only Responsible Agency:

Community Development and
Building Departments
Funding: Department
budgets
Time Frame: Sites will be
made available within one
year of Housing Element
adoption.

The City completed
the rezoning to
accommodate the 4th
Cycle shortfall of
1,916 sites in 2019,
and implemented
minimum densities for
the RM-Urban
Neighborhood and
RM-General
Neighborhood.

Rezoning to complete
the 5th Cycle shortfall
is in progress as of
June 2021.

Delete - Rezoning
anticipated to be
completed by the
start of the 6th Cycle
Planning period.

1.4 Evaluate opportunities for parcel assembly and the use of underutilized sites for affordable housing. Discuss housing development potential with developers and consider relaxing development standards and prioritizing application processing to facilitate housing on these sites. Communicate with developers regarding the variety of housing development options available for these sites under the new General Plan.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: Ongoing,
2014–2021
The City has
encouraged parcel
assembly and use of
underutilized sites for
affordable housing
such as the Pueblo
Viejo Villas mixed use
project (Chelsea
Investments) which
required use of the
planning unit
development to
accommodate the
project height and
density.

Continue.

Page 687 ends

Item 27.

Existing Programs Review City of Coachella | D-5
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue

1.5 Regularly post housing data, such as information on building permits, vacancy rates,and availability of funding sources, on the City’s website and provide the information ina hard copy, available upon request.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
DepartmentFunding:

Department budgetTime
Frame: 2014; updated every
6 months thereafter
Not Complete.

Modify - Continue
providing info upon
request only.

1.6 Encourage developers to provide units with three or more bedrooms, suitable to house large households. In addition, identify incentives for development of housing suitable for families with children, with family members requiring assistance, and multigenerational families. Encourage and where feasible incentivize developers to construct new units that include a full bathroom and bedroom on the first floor.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: Offer incentives
and work with developers as
projects are processed
through the Community
Development Department.

New proposed single
family residential
development during
the 5th Cycle element
proposes a minimum
of 3 bedrooms
(Valencia at
Coachella, Pulte)
(Escondida Pointe,
DR Horton) (Sevilla,
Pulte) (Coachella
155, DR Horton)
Modify - Separate
policy from action.

1.7 Consider preparing a study to explore the benefits and impacts of an inclusionary housing ordinance. The study will:
• Determine an appropriate percentage of affordable units and potential level of affordability;
• Analyze potential program options including the provision of below market rates on and off-site as well as land
dedication and in-lieu fee options; and
• Examine administrative resources required to administer an inclusionary program.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: 2014
The City does not
have an inclusionary
housing policy and a
study has not been
conducted.

Modify - Consider
exploring incentivesbased programs to
avoid unnecessarily
constraining housing
development.

1.8 Facilitate development on large sites designated for high-density housing by communicating with developers regarding housing opportunities for these sites, providing priority subdivision processing, and utilizing the new Master Plan review process (as described in the draft General Plan Land Use Element) to facilitate affordable unit development. Work with land owners and developers to create sites ranging from one to 10 acres in size that are feasible and appropriate for the development of affordable housing.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: Adopt the
Master Plan process as part
of the new General Plan in
early 2014; engage in
ongoing dialogue with
developers; and offer priority
The City has
successfully made
progress on this
program through
various developments
/ conversations with
large-site property
owners, such as
Peter Rabbit Farms.

Continue.

Page 688 ends

Item 27.

D-6 | City of Coachella Existing Programs Review
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue
subdivision processing as
applications are submitted.

Goal 2: Conservation and Improvement. A preserved and well-maintained existing affordable housing stock.

2.1 Continue to implement the City’s Residential Rehabilitation Program as funding is available. Allow funds to be used to alleviate overcrowding, make improvements to accommodate the special needs of elderly and disabled residents, including persons with developmental disabilities, and improve energy efficiency. The City will continue to advertise the program on the City’s website, share program information with service organizations, and post program information in City Hal Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: CDBG and HOME
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding has not been
available for this
program but this City
is looking to make
funds available in the
next fiscal year with
CDBG funds.

Continue

2.2 Continue to monitor housing conditions throughout the city, and periodically conduct formal housing condition surveys.

Responsible Agencies:

Community Development and
Building Departments
Funding: Department
budgets and (for housing
condition surveys) CDBG
Planning/Technical
Assistance Grants
Time Frame: 2014 and as
funding is available through
2021
Code enforcement
monitors housing
conditions and
ensures compliance
of housing conditions
with City’s Municipal
Code. .

Modify - "…conduct
formal or informal
housing condition
surveys".

2.3 Continue to implement the abandoned and vacant property ordinances, enforce proactive neighborhood enhancement policies, and explore new methods of eliminating unsightly property conditions in residential areas.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: Ongoing,
2014–2021
Code Enforcement
continues to monitor
vacant properties and
ensure that Municipal
Code compliance.

Continue.

2.4 Continue to monitor health and safety issues related to substandard mobile home parks located within the city limits and those within the City’s sphere of influence. Explore funding opportunities for a loan or grant program to assist with mobile home unit and park repairs and improvements as well as mobile home ownership.

Responsible Agency:

Coachella Community
Services Department
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: Explore
program by 2015, monitoring
ongoing
No action
Modify- Clarify the
split responsibility
between City and
State for permitting
and compliance.

Page 689 ends

Item 27.

Existing Programs Review City of Coachella | D-7
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue

2.5 Maintain a representative and an alternate to the CVAG Housing Committee to consistently represent the City in discussions regarding housing issues.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department, City Council
Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: Annually
There is no longer a
CVAG Housing
Committee.

Modify –. City to
continue to
participate in CVAG
housing-related
discussions.

2.6 Participate in the SAFE Cities Committee and in other groups and committees that bring together public safety, neighborhood enhancement, and regional representatives
Responsible Agency:

Economic Development
Department
Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: Ongoing
This does not exist Delete.

2.7 Work with Riverside County, Riverside County LAFCO, Coachella Valley Water District, the Coachella Valley Regional Water Management Group (CVWRMG), and local advocacy organizations to identify and address housing-related infrastructure needs in disadvantaged unincorporated communities within and adjacent to the City’s sphere of influence. The City will participate in outreach and information gathering events and strategy sessions, contribute to efforts to identify and estimate the cost of potential infrastructure improvements including the preparation of the Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (prepared by CVWRMG), and pursue funding sources to complete
necessary upgrades.

As a condition of approval for development in new growth areas, require that developers plan for and construct oversized facilities to create infrastructure connection opportunities for nearby disadvantaged communities. Coordinate with agencies and
communities’ groups to explore annexation potential and timeframes.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: Attend events
as available, engage in
ongoing communication with
Riverside County and other
organizations, assist with
funding applications as
NOFAs are released, require
infrastructure extensions as
development agreements are
prepared in new growth
areas, engage in ongoing
dialogue(meet at least
annually) to determine
annexation potential and
timeframes.

The City is part of the
Coachella Valley
Regional Water
Management Group.

Since its formation
the City has applied
and received grant
funding to prepare
infrastructure plans
that extend outside
the City’s limits and
into its sphere of
influence, the City has
also secured funding
for the construction of
some of the identified
projects and is
currently under
application review for
others
Modify – Due to high
infrastructure costs,
relax requirement
(i.e., "Consider
requiring") for
oversized facilities in
new growth areas;
organize the different
components of this
program under a
broader DUCs
program.

Goal 3: Reduced Energy Usage. Reduced residential energy usage within the city, resulting in reduced housing costs.

3.1 Continue to utilize the development review process to incorporate energy conservation techniques into the siting and design of proposed residences to minimize energy consumption as well as housing costs Responsible Agencies:

Community Development and
Building Departments
Funding: Department
budgets
Time Frame: Ongoing
City has not tracked
this. But City has
started to add this to
design review for new
projects since
conservation
techniques are
Modify - Develop
objective standards
for energy
conservation
techniques.

Page 690 ends

Item 27.

D-8 | City of Coachella Existing Programs Review
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue
policies of the
General Plan.

3.2 Continue to require that, at a minimum, all new residential development complies with the energy conservation requirements of Title 24 of the California Administrative Code.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: Ongoing
This is required by the
Building Division Continue.

3.3 Assist in distributing information to the public regarding free home water consumption audits of the Coachella Water Authority and rebate programs offered by Imperial Irrigation District.

Responsible Agency: IID,
Community Development
Department
Funding: N/A, materials
provided by IID
Time Frame: Ongoing
No request for
information. City has
not actively
distributed
information.

Continue.

3.4 Assist in distributing information about energy efficiency retrofit rebates and financing opportunities available to the residents and property owners such as Energy Upgrade California, the New Solar Homes Partnership, and the Western Riverside Council of
Governments HERO program.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: N/A, materials
provided by rebate/financing
programs
Time Frame: Ongoing
No request for
information. City has
not actively
distributed
information.

Modify- City is not
located within
WRCOG. Remain
open to parrtnerships
between CVAG and
WRCOG for energy
programs.

Goal 4: Equal Housing Opportunity. Equal housing opportunities for all residents of the city regardless of race, religion, marital status, age, sex, nationality, physical or developmental disability, family size, and level and source of income.

4.1 Continue to provide information on fair housing law on the City’s website, at City Hall, and at the local library. In addition, the City Clerk shall continue to include a statement to City utility bills which indicates that information on fair housing laws is available to the public without charge.

Information will be provided in both English and Spanish. Complaints may be directed to the Community Development Department.

Responsible Agency: City
Manager’s Office, Community
Development Department,
City Clerk
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: Ongoing,
2014–2021
The City provides Fair
Housing brochures at
City Hall
Continue.

4.2 Adopt a “Reasonable Accommodation” procedure, in accordance with SB 520, as part of the updated Zoning Code to allow for administrative processing of requests for features and accessibility for persons with disabilities and persons with developmental disabilities.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: City General Fund
Time Frame: 2015, as part of
the comprehensive Zoning
Code update
Did not complete. Continue.

Page 691 ends

Item 27.

Existing Programs Review City of Coachella | D-9
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue

4.3 Amend the Zoning Code to define transitional and supportive housing in accordance with the Health and Safety Code, Sections 50675.14 and 50675.2, and specify that both types of housing shall be treated as residential uses of property, subject to the same restrictions/regulations as other types of housing in the same zoning district.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development and
Building Departments
Funding: City General Fund
Time Frame: Within one year
of Housing Element adoption
The Zoning Code
does not explicitly
allow transitional and
supportive housing,
subject to the same
requirements of a
residential use in the
same zone.

Continue.

4.4 Continue to actively support efforts of providers who establish short-term bed facilities for segments of the homeless population including specialized groups such as the mentally ill and the chronically disabled.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: General Fund
Time Frame: Ongoing,
2014–2021
No action Modify – Reframe as
policy.

4.5 Amend the Zoning Code to include manufactured housing as an approved housing type, as per State of California requirements.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department, Planning
Commission
Funding: City General Fund
Time Frame: 2015,
amendment will be
completed as part of the
comprehensive Zoning Code
update
Not Complete.

Manufactured
housing is allowed as
a conditional use only
in the R-O-6000
Residential Overlay
Zone.

Continue.

4.6 Revise the Zoning Code to allow State-licensed and unlicensed group homes, foster homes, residential care facilities, and similar facilities; to allow, by right, group homes with six or fewer persons in any residential zone; and to allow with administrative approval group homes with greater than six persons in all high-density residential zoning districts.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Departmental
budget
Time Frame: Within one year
of adoption of this Housing
Element
Not Complete. Group
homes are not listed
as an allowable use
in either R-S or R-M
zones.

Continue.

4.7 Amend the Zoning Code to ensure that permit processing procedures for farmworker housing do not conflict with Health and Safety Code Sections 10721.5 and 17021.6. The City will also ensure that such procedures encourage and facilitate the development of housing for farmworkers.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department, Planning
Commission
Funding: Departmental
budgets
Time Frame: Within one year
Not Complete. Code
(use tables) does not
discuss residential or
group farmworker
housing.

Continue.

Page 692 ends

Item 27.

D-10 | City of Coachella Existing Programs Review
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue
of adoption of this Housing
Element

4.8 Amend the Zoning Code to define single-room occupancy units (SROs) and identify zones in which SROs are allowed. Facilitate the development of SROs as appropriate housing type for persons with special needs and extremely low incomes.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department, Planning
Commission
Funding: Departmental
budgets
Time Frame: Within one year
of adoption of this Housing
Element
Not Complete. Continue.

4.9 Amend the Zoning Code to broaden the definition of “family” in keeping with state and federal law and current best practices to protect the rights of persons with disabilities and nontraditional families.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department, Planning
Commission
Funding: Departmental
budgets
Time Frame: Within one year
of adoption of this Housing
Element
Complete. Delete.

4.10 Encourage the development of housing for farmworkers by assisting developers with site identification and providing technical assistance on funding applications. In addition, the City will develop an informational brochure illustrating the possible funding sources and other potential incentives for the development of farmworker housing and provide this brochure at the Community Development Department and on the City web site.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department, Planning
Commission
Funding: Departmental
budgets
Time Frame: Assist
farmworker housing
developers as needed,
prepare and make brochure
available within one year of
Housing Element adoption
City assists
developers on
request. An
informational
brochure has not
been developed.

Modify- Remove
brochure
Goal 5: Remove Constraints. Policies, standards and programs that facilitate the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing commensurate with local needs.

5.1 Upon adoption of the General Plan, the City will conduct a study that analyzes changes needed to the Zoning Code to implement the new General Plan and will then complete a comprehensive Zoning Code update. The updated Zoning Code will build on concepts outlined in the Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department budget
Not Complete.

Modify - Ensure that
the Code update
removes barriers to
production of a

Page 693 ends

Item 27.

Existing Programs Review City of Coachella | D-11
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue
General Plan to incorporate the use of innovative land use techniques and construction methods such as clustering of units, density transfers, zero lot line development, and others to minimize housing development costs and to maximize development opportunities.

Time Frame: Every five
years
variety of housing
types.

5.2 Periodically (every five years) survey other cities in the Riverside County area to ensure that the City’s development fees are reasonable and do not pose an unreasonable constraint to housing development.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department
budget: possible CDBG
Planning/Technical
Assistance Grant
Time Frame: 2015 and 2020
Not complete
Modify- compare fees
to other jurisdictions
using a cost recovery
model

5.3 Encourage concurrent processing of entitlements to foster an environment conducive to business, allowing various analyses and staff reports to be done at the same time, rather than requiring one process to be completed before beginning the next process. Department staff will notify applicants early in development process of this policy and maintain public notice of the City’s policy on the website.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: Ongoing,
2014–2021
The City allows
concurrent processing
of entitlements and
encourages this.

Modify - Reframe as
a policy.

5.4 Review revisions to the Zoning Code to evaluate implementation of reduced parking requirements for residential projects serving special needs groups or for projects located close to public transportation or commercial services.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development and
Building Departments
Funding: Department
budgets
Time Frame: 2015 as part of
the comprehensive Zoning
Code update
Not Complete.

Modify - Amend code
to reduce parking
requirements for
special needs
groups, including low
income households.

5.5 Amend the Zoning Code to allow second units with ministerial review (rather than a Conditional Use Permit) in the R-O-6000 zone. Review second unit requirements and identify zoning changes to facilitate second unit development as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code update.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: 2015 as part of
the comprehensive Zoning
Code update
Not Complete.

However, City has an
ADU ordinance
consistent with GC
65852.

Modify - Remove
references to second
units in Code and rely
on the City's ADU
ordinance.

5.6 Monitor residential development under the new General Plan land use categories. Review densities proposed for new development, correspond with developers, and assess how the new densities are or are not working to facilitate housing development, particularly affordable housing units.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department budget
The city does not
regularly monitor
densities achieved
compared to densities
allowed under the
Modify - Meet SB 166
(No Net Loss) to
maintain site
inventory throughout
the planning period.

Page 694 ends

Item 27.

D-12 | City of Coachella Existing Programs Review
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue
Time Frame: Review
annually
new general plan.

City Staff has not
observed interest in
developers to
maximize density
permitted in higher
density land uses
such as the General
or Urban
Neighborhood
designations.

Goal 6: Adequate Housing//Housing Affordability. Adequate housing to meet the needs of all economic segments of the community.

6.1 When feasible, continue to defer development fees for housing units affordable to extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households.

Responsible Agencies:

Community Development,
Building, and Public Works
Departments
Financing: Department
budgets
Time Frame: Ongoing, as
projects are processed
through the Community
Development Department
City has entered into
agreements to allow
deferred development
fees
Continue.

6.2 Continue to work with nonprofit and for-profit developers to apply for financing to fund the development of housing affordable to lower-income and special needs households, particularly housing that will serve persons with extremely low incomes, farmworkers, the elderly, and persons with disabilities and developmental disabilities. Funding sources may include, but are not limited to, the USDA Section 515 Rural Housing Program, MHP, Joe Serna Farmworker Housing Grant Program, CalHome, Low Income Housing Tax Credits, and tax-exempt bonds. The City will be open to providing letters of support for funding applications; the City will also consider partnerships with nonprofits for utilization of City staff to help write and to review project applications. The City will take actions necessary to expedite processing and approvals for such projects.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: General Fund,
HCD
Time Frame: Assist with
funding applications as
needed, 2014–2021;
annually review potential
funding opportunities
The City has worked
with nonprofit
developers for
financing such as
Low income Housing
Tax Credits and IIG
funding.

Continue.

6.3 Continue to pursue funding for the construction and rehabilitation of affordable housing, including annual applications for HOME and CDBG funds. The City will work with nonprofit and for-profit housing developers Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: HCD
The City continues to
support this and has
supported nonprofits
applications for IIG
Continue.

Page 695 ends

Item 27.

Existing Programs Review City of Coachella | D-13
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue
and will take actions necessary to expedite processing and approvals for such projects.

Time Frame: Apply for
funding annually, 2014–2021
funds and low income
housing tax credits.

The City has
expedited
development
processing pursuant
to State SB 35
requirements.

1. Submitted a
successful grant
application under the
AHSC program to
build Pueblo Viejo
Villas (105 units)

CHELSEA

2. Rehabilitated/Preserv
ed Coachella
Community Homes
Apartments (101
units) CVHC

3. Rehabilitated/Preserv
ed Pueblo Nuevo
Apartments (50 units)
CVHC

4. Applied for Joe
Serna Farmworker
Housing Funding to
Rehabilitate/Preserve
Las Casas II & III
Apartments (115
units) CVHC (not
approved)

5. Replacing/Constructin
g Coachella Valley
Apartments (replacing
20 units; building

Page 696 ends

Item 27.

D-14 | City of Coachella Existing Programs Review
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue
addtl. 36 new units =
56 units)

6.4 Continue to offer a density bonus in keeping with state law (Government Code Section 65915).

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: Department budget
Time Frame: Ongoing,
2014–2021
The City continues to
offer a density bonus
incentive in Chapter

17.88 of the Zoning
Code.

Modify - Update
Density Bonus
Ordinance per new
State law.

6.5 As part of the City’s website update, the City will include housing-related resources including information regarding the City’s housing rehabilitation program, first-time homebuyer loans, loans available through CalHFA, and other relevant links.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: CalHFA First-Time
Homebuyer Program
Time Frame: 2015, as part of
the City’s comprehensive
website update
Not Complete. Continue.

Goal 7: Housing Preservation. Preservation of existing affordable housing opportunities for lower income residents of the city.

7.1 Actively support the Riverside County Housing Authority’s attempts to secure additional Section 8 rental assistance for low-income households.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Financing: HUD Section 8
Certificate and Housing
Voucher Programs
Time Frame: Ongoing
The City continues to
support Riverside
County Housing
Authority's efforts to
provide rental
assistance in
Coachella.

Continue.

7.2 Monitor and assist in the preservation of affordable units at risk of converting to market rate. Actions will include:
• Monitor the Risk Assessment report published by the California Housing Partnership Corporation (CHPC).
• Maintain regular contact with the local HUD office regarding early warnings of possible opt-outs.
• Maintain contact with the owners and managers of existing affordable housing to determine if there are plans to opt out in the future and offer assistance in locating eligible buyers. • Maintain the list of potential purchasers of at-risk units and act as a liaison between owners and eligible purchasers.

Responsible Agency:

Community Development
Department
Funding: HCD
Time Frame: As needed and
ongoing, 2014–2021
The City has
monitored the status
of housing projects
with expiring
covenants. City works
with Community
Housing
Opportunities
Corporation to apply
for 9% tax credit
allocation, Joe Serna
Funds, and County
Housing Authority
Continue.

Page 697 ends

Item 27.

Existing Programs Review City of Coachella | D-15
Program
#
Program
Description
Responsible
Party; Timeline
Evaluation
Modify/Delete/
Continue
• Ensure that all owners and managers of affordable housing are provided with applicable state and federal laws regarding notice to tenants of the owner’s desire to opt-out or prepay. State law requires a 12-month notice.
facilitated funding for
redeveloping an
existing affordable
housing site into 110
unit multifamily
residential
development (CV
Apartments).

Page 698 ends

Item 27.

Page 699 ends

Item 27.

Public Outreach Summaries City of Coachella | E-1
Appendix E: Public Outreach Summaries

Page 700 ends

Item 27.

Page 701 ends

Item 27.

Public Outreach Summaries City of Coachella | E-1
Appendix E: Public Outreach Summaries
E1. Focus Group Meetings
E2. Steering Committee Meetings
E3. Public Workshop
E4. Study Session

Page 702 ends

Item 27.

Page 703 ends

Date: May 6, 2021
Subject: Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update- Summary Focus Groups Focus Group Overview
The City of Coachella conducted two focus group meetings as part of the preparation of the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update. Led by the City’s consultant, Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. (LWC), the meetings were conducted virtually via Zoom, on Wednesday April 21, 2021 and Friday April 23, 2021 with 8 individuals with special knowledge and interest in housing issues in the City. The purpose of the meetings was to introduce the Housing Element update process and solicit feedback on housing related issues and opportunities which will inform and support the development of policies and programs for the City. The City conducted meetings with the following groups:

1. Community and Housing Advocates; and

2. Housing Developers
Each meeting began with a presentation by LWC on the Housing Element, including purpose, components of a Housing Element, and overview of State requirements. Following the presentation, LWC facilitated a discussion guided by open-ended questions about fair housing issues, market characteristics, development constraints, housing needs (including special needs groups), and unique housing conditions and opportunities in the city. Participants were encouraged to respond to the questions verbally, but the chat function was also available for use, if preferred. The presentation is included in Attachment A and the questions are provided in Attachment B of this memo.

The City identified and sent email invites to 51 individuals, with reminder notifications sent closer to the date. The participants were invited to join a meeting based on their industry and area of familiarity. Of the 51 invited individuals, 11 RSVP’d, and 8 individuals participated. LWC offered follow up meetings to three individuals who were unable to attend their scheduled meeting.

Below is a summary of the feedback received during the meetings.

E1. Focus Group Meetings

Page 704 ends

Item 27.
983 Osos Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | (805) 595 1345 | lisawiseconsulting.com | 2 Summary of Feedback
The following is a summary of the input received from all participants, in aggregate format.

A. Coachella Housing Needs

1. Underserved groups tend to be low-income individuals, older individuals, full time and seasonal agriculture workers, mixed status families, and Native Americans.

2. There is a need and an interest in creating workforce housing, especially housing for farmworkers near the farms.

3. Accessory Dwelling Units are a growing in-demand housing option in Coachella which should be encouraged, but a diverse range of housing types are still needed to meet the demands of the City.

4. Mixed status families are afraid to apply for additional housing aid from state and federal resources even though they may need it and qualify.

5. There is an interest in preserving existing seasonal farmworker housing in unincorporated areas of the County.

6. Development within the City of Coachella tends to concentrate and segregate housing opportunities based off socioeconomic status. There needs to be a better integration of various income level housing opportunities throughout the City.

B. Housing and Development Constraints

1. Development standards need to be reevaluated to increase flexibility in housing production.

Participants have shown desire to reduce setbacks, up zone areas, and create more mixed-use opportunities in the City’s Downtown.

2. Developers may use Senate Bill 35 for future development so City staff should increase familiarity with the law and its implication for housing development to help expedite approval.

3. Affordable housing developers are building larger family units (1-, 2-, and 3-bedroom apartments) and supportive housing. Larger family units require more amenities and infrastructure driving up costs and fees.

4. The type of affordable housing (e.g., attached apartments, row houses, etc.) is driven by the funding systems in place that pay for affordable housing development. Affordable housing developers are restricted to the type of housing that their funding sources pay for.

5. Affordable housing developers have difficulty meeting state and federal funding requirements because of the City’s density restrictions and other limitations (parking, height limits, Floor Area Ratio restrictions, etc.).

6. Affordable housing developers use scorecards to identify appropriate sites for development that are likely to be competitive for funding. For a site to be rated high on the scorecard, the site usually must be a certain size to meet a density threshold and must be located close in proximity to community amenities such as parks, transportation, and schools.

These sites are rare in Coachella and the greater Coachella Valley.

Page 705 ends

Item 27.
983 Osos Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | (805) 595 1345 | lisawiseconsulting.com | 3

7. Coachella may identify sites that they would like to be developed for affordable housing.

However, if the site does not have access to community amenities or infrastructure in-place then it is infeasible for affordable housing to be developed by nature of the funding mechanisms in place. Cities will not invest in infrastructure/amenities if the population is not there. Affordable housing developers cannot develop if the infrastructure/amenities is not in place. This is a cycle that requires better coordination to ensure sites meet criteria for funding.

C. Policy/Program Recommendations

1. Develop a comprehensive short term rental policy. Short term rentals fragment the community and are very expensive/lucrative preventing more housing from being established and can be related to the gentrification and displacement of communities within the City.

2. Explore various programs and policies that encourage equal opportunity to housing such as permanent affordability and inclusionary zoning.

3. Consider developing an anti-displacement policy because development is occurring disproportionately (primarily in the west part of the City) and at varying scales for different neighborhoods. Vulnerable communities have been displaced and more neighbors are atrisk.

4. Explore first-time homebuyer programs and subsidy programs for low-income residents in order for this income group to mix with the larger Coachella population.

5. Provide additional financial relief to affordable housing developers. If capital is not available, then the City should reevaluate its existing resources and processes to reduce overall construction costs. Multiple affordable housing developers emphasized fee waivers as an appropriate financial relief option.

6. Streamline the permitting process to reduce cost of development and time spent on permitting process. An expensive development process will defeat any well-intentioned policy because projects time and money on the administrative process and approval procedures.

7. Research the financial feasibility of mixed-use homes with affordable housing above commercial uses.

8. Annex agricultural land outside City limits to preserve and develop more farmworker housing. Farmworkers are an often-displaced socioeconomic group since the cost of living within the City is too high. In order to accommodate the needs of farmworkers and prevent further displacement, the City should consider annexing the agricultural land outside the City where the cost of living is more affordable and where farmworkers are currently commuting to.

Page 706 ends

Item 27.

Coachella
Housing Element Update
April 2021
1 Appendix : Focus Group Presentation

Page 707 ends

Item 27.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
Agenda
• What is the Housing Element
• Update Process
• Discussion
2

Page 708 ends

Item 27.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
A Housing Element is required by State law
and compels Woodland to do their “fair share”
of planning for adequate housing
What is the Housing Element
Housing Element must:
• Assess community housing needs and conditions of
housing stock
• Establish a roadmap to accommodate projected
housing demands
• Set citywide housing-related goals, objectives,
policies, and programs
• Show how the City will meet demand for housing for
all income levels
Other Mandatory
General Plan Elements:
3

Page 709 ends

Item 27.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update

1. Housing Element Review: A performance evaluation of policies and programs from previous housing elements.

2. Housing Needs Assessment: A review of the existing and projected housing needs, especially regarding special needs populations

3. Adequate Sites Inventory: A record of suitable land zoned to accommodate the City’s share of regional housing needs

4. Housing Resources Assessment: Identified opportunities to support the development, preservation, and rehabilitation of housing

5. Housing Constraints Assessment: Identified governmental and non-governmental (market, environmental, etc.) impediments to housing development

6. Implementation Plan: Goals, policies, and programs dedicated to meeting the City’s housing need
What is the Housing Element
Housing Element Components
4

Page 710 ends

Item 27.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
What is the Housing Element
Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
Regional Housing Needs
Assessment or RHNA:
• Projected number of new housing
units needed
• Each jurisdiction must show it can
accommodate its total RHNA
number, and its allocations by
income level.
• Mandated by State law
SCAG CVAG Coachella
6th Cycle
RHNA
6th Cycle
RHNA
6th Cycle RHNA
Share
Very Low
30-50% MFI 352,796 6,204 1,033
Low
50-80% MFI 206,807 4,664 999
Moderate
80-120% MFI 223,957 5,561 1,367
Above
Moderate
>120% MFI
559,267 15,190 4,487
Total 1,341,827 31,619 7,886
Coachella City Median income 4-person household: $34,224 5 Riverside County Median income 4-person household: $67,005 Page 711 Item 27.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
What is the Housing Element
How Does the Housing Element Help the City Meet its Goals? • Develop an inventory of sites sufficient to meet
the City’s RHNA allocation
• Establish policies and programs to incentivize
both market-rate and affordable housing
development
• Identify additional strategies to reduce constraints
and expand housing production
6

Page 712 ends

Item 27.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
Update Process

WE ARE HERE
7

Page 713 ends

Item 27.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
Focus Groups - Why We Are Here
• Purpose: Introduce the housing element update,
discuss opportunities and constraints to housing
development, and receive policy/program
recommendations
• Who/When: Three (3) focus group sessions for a
variety of stakeholders including
o Community and Housing Advocates
o Housing Developers
o Local Institutions and Businesses
Update Process
8

Page 714 ends

Item 27.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
• Group Norms
o Each participant will be treated with respect
o Please be mindful of time
o Allow other participants to finish speaking before beginning to speak • Format
o Open discussion with guided questions
o The chat function will be available if you would like to provide written comment, though the focus is will be on the dialogue.
• Recordation: Notes will be taken, and chats will be saved Focus Group Protocols
9

Page 715 ends

Item 27.

City of Coachella, Housing Element Update
Discussion

Page 716 ends

Item 27.
983 Osos Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | (805) 595 1345 | lisawiseconsulting.com | 4 Appendix B: Focus Group Discussion Questions
Community and Housing Advocates

1. Who are the most underserved groups in the City?

2. What type of housing is most needed/in short in supply in Coachella?

3. Do you see any disparities or concerns in housing patterns or trends in Coachella?

4. Are you concerned about concentration or segregation in housing access and/or opportunity in Coachella?

5. What are the most critical gaps in housing services/options in Coachella?

6. What are the challenges or barriers to filling these gaps/providing adequate and sufficient housing?

7. What would be your top policy or program recommendations to the City? Housing Developers

1. What types of housing does your organization specialize in? What role does your organization play in helping provide housing in Coachella?

2. What are the unique challenges with building housing in Coachella?

3. Are there any specific constraints with residential development standards and/or approval procedures in Coachella?

4. What are the most in demand housing typologies in Coachella? o What can the City do to facilitate these types of housing developments?

5. Where (geographically) do you see opportunities for (affordable) housing in Coachella?

6. What would be your top policy or program recommendations to Coachella?

7. For affordable developers only:
o Tell us about your most successful project in Coachella or nearby communities? Why? • What are the key factors for that success?
o What are the unique challenges with building affordable housing in Coachella?

Page 717 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 1 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
City of Coachella
Steering Committee Meeting Notes
Date: July 26, 2021
Time: 5:00 PM
Attendees:

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc.:
• Kathryn Slama
• David Bergman
• Lindsey Squirewell
City of Coachella:
• Gabriel Perez, Assistant Community Development Director Steering Committee:
• Ana Perez
• Taylor Varner
• Fernando Heredia
• Mike Walsh
• Jim Kosak
• Daniel Wozniak
• Absent
 Sahara Huazano – Alianza Coachella Valley
 Dave Davis- Chelsea Investments

1. Introductions

1. Taylor Varner - Lift to Rise
a. Lives in Indio
b. Regional Affordable Housing Planner at Lift to Rise
c. Wants to contribute as a community developer and provide input to the local government on constraints

2. Fernando Heredia - Our Lady of Soledad
a. Deacon at Our Lady of Soledad
b. Lives in La Quinta
c. Wants to help because effective housing creates productive citizenship E2.- Steering Committee Meetings

Page 718 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 2

3. Mike Walsh – Riverside County Housing Authority
a. Works for Riverside County Housing Authority, Workforce Housing b. Member of Our Lady of Soledad
c. Lives in Indio
d. Wants to help with solving housing challenges and creating effective partnerships with other organizations

4. Ana Perez – Real Estate Agent
a. Lives and works in Coachella for 12 years
b. Real estate professional
c. Opened her real-estate office in 2020
d. Wants to contribute housing market knowledge and service to the community

5. Jim Kosak – Strategic Land Partners
a. Works for Strategic Land Partners
b. Owner of 280-acre property
c. Developed hotels, mixed-use, and multi-family and single-family detached residential
d. Has 25 years of real-estate experience

6. Daniel Wozniak - Pulte Homes
a. Works as a developer for Pulte Homes (3rd largest builder in the U.S.) b. Four projects in Coachella, 50 – 200 lot projects
c. Lives in Coachella
d. Interested in what the City’s housing goals and interests are for the future

2. Steering Committee Overview
a. Discussed Role and Purpose of the Steering Committee b. Advisory Recommendations to City staff

3. Discussion
• No one is building 30 du/ac (HCD assumes affordable housing more likely on properties with densities allowed up to 30 du/ac). Cap and trade project (Pueblo villas) probably isn’t 30 ac/du. It is difficult to achieve the required density unless the units are studio or one bedroom, as its too expensive to build taller. The market cannot absorb the cost of affordable housing construction without outside sources. The current rents are not high enough to cover the costs of more expensive development typologies.
• Coachella needs more infrastructure investment, reduce funding and timing for future projects.

Suggests that policies should focus on high density and lower development costs to help fulfill the requirements (e.g. tiered fee structure). Opportunity to shorten entitlement timeline (takes years at times). Suggests City makes SB 35 streamlining more visible as an option.

Page 719 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 3 • Land brokers need incentives to increase density to bring down land costs and lower development costs if City wants to affordable housing units. Most owners entitle larger lots (7,200 sf) to set up for product types of key developers. Consider streamlining and allowing smaller lots w/o extra process.
• Organizations such as Habitat for Humanity will be helpful in the affordable housing construction and helping increase housing supply.
• Builders want certainty in development. Time to entitle land is a negative. Owners/developers will not ask for exceptions to requirements (even if allowed), if it would require any extra process or extend the review/entitlement period.
• Cost of land:
o Raw land always takes time to process, it is an expectation in the entitlement process o Cost of land depends on size, if it entitled, utility access, etc. o Some people buy land cheap, entitle and process CEQA then resell much higher (e.g. $10k/acre Agricultural land resell at $400k to $1M/acre if entitled and ready to go • City seeking “pro-housing’ designation. Recommend adding policies into the Housing Element to help identify incentives.

Page 720 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 1 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
City of Coachella
Steering Committee Meeting Agenda
Date: August 16, 2021
Time: 5:00 PM
Attendees:

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. (LWC):
• Kathryn Slama
• David Bergman
• Lindsey Squirewell
City of Coachella:
• Gabriel Perez, Assistant Community Development Director Steering Committee:
• Ana Perez– Real Estate Agent
• Taylor Varner - Lift to Rise
• Fernando Heredia- Our Lady of Soledad
• Mike Walsh – Riverside County Housing Authority
• Jim Kosak– Strategic Land Partners
• Daniel Wozniak - Pulte Homes
• Sahara Huazano (1st meeting) – Alianza Coachella Valley • Kenneth Rogers (1st meeting) – CVHC Sr project Manager in Indio

1. Technical Assessment Discussion
o Is Coachella considering an inclusionary housing requirement? o Is the 5th Cycle rezone program completed?
 City estimates completion in September 2021
o Is rezoning expected for the 6th cycle?
 City has capacity under General Plan land use. City will need to rezone to implement the General Plan
o Is City pursuing a “pro-housing” designation?
o Will the Housing Element address homelessness and farmworkers? o Constraints
 Development fees are higher for singer family development

Page 721 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 2  City should compare to other cities in the desert
 Are other requirements a constraint (e.g. setbacks)
• For single family, setbacks are not a constraint. Reduced setbacks would allow larger building envelope (for single family), not necessarily help with affordability
• Relaxed setbacks can create more infill sites opportunities – all density options should be considered
 Street with smaller widths (that don’t meet City ROW requirements) are subject to HOA rules and not zoning rules. This is difficult at times • Some developments provide private small street with no sidewalks to decrease building costs
• City to allow smaller streets, can avoid HOA and reduce costs o Affordable Housing and Incentives
 What are the incentives for developer to provide affordable housing since the profit yields less than market rate housing? Needs to make up the difference and protect market rate owners investment
 Incentives are usually a requirement of affordable development, unless City implements inclusionary requirement
 Community Land Trust- maintain affordability when sold  Single family is being excluded from affordable housing assumptions because high density requirements for affordable housing
 Affordable housing is not affordable to build, just affordable to tenants. Need subsidy and tax credits
 Don’t limit development too much, otherwise other development types are not feasible (e.g. single family)
 Programs can include covenants for home loans (for certain professions (teachers, nurses) they can qualify for higher loans
 For profit companies and nonprofit companies should team up to qualify for the most financing options (and the nonprofit can help navigate requirements for subsidy and tax credits)
 Developers should have options to include affordable housing

2. Draft Implementation Plan
o How are we going to prioritize affordable housing?
o Are we going to expand residential zones?
o SB35
 General Plan/Zoning consistency is a challenge without an updated Code  Look into San Francisco as a reference for SB35 implementation procedures o Uncertainty is the biggest risk for developers
 Remove CEQA requirements, decrease building process & plan check time

Page 722 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 3  Developers would pay extra for express/expedited processing  We should develop ways to lower development fees or give land to developers  Fee waivers to expedite process
o A city funded senior center funded would be a good amenity – provide residential development near by
o Amenities and neighborhood resources are important to consider to ensure equity in housing placement
 Create a subdivision of affordable housing next to market rate o No known areas of segregation or concentration
o No areas as high resources or opportunity by TCAC, this is a disadvantage when competing for funding
 What does Coachella need to have higher numbers of opportunity zones o Coachella has low income compared to region, but higher rate of home ownership  How to maintain ownership opportunities without USDA 502 loans

Page 723 ends

Item 27.
6th Cycle Housing Element Update
City of Coachella
Steering Committee Meeting #3 Agenda
Date: August 27, 2021 Call-In Number: +1669 900 6833
Time: 5:00 PM Meeting ID: 825 3325 0937 Passcode: 888689 Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82533250937?pwd=a2FCLzZVRUJuZ1lpVzkrcVNIcmlaUT09

1. Welcome

2. Draft Housing Element Release
a. Goals and Policies/ Programs Discussion

4. Public Workshop Preparation – October 14th
a. Ideas for Workshop Format
b. Outreach

5. Next Steps
a. Joint Study Session of City Council and Planning Commission Nov 8 at 5 p.m.

Page 724 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 1 City of Coachella
6th Cycle Housing Element Update
Public Workshop
Thursday, October 14, 2021, at 6:00 pm
Zoom Webinar
Introduction
On October 14, 2021, the City of Coachella (City) hosted a virtual public workshop for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update project. Gabriel Perez, Community Development Director, opened the meeting and explained the intent of the workshop is to provide information about the Housing Element Update process and answer questions. The presentation was available in English and live Spanish translation. Director Perez introduced additional City staff and the Consultant Team, Lisa Wise Consulting Inc. (LWC). Kathryn Slama, Senior Associate and project manager, and David Bergman, Director, presented on behalf of LWC. The presentation addressed the following topics:

1. Housing Element Overview

2. Process and Public Outreach

3. Housing Needs and Conditions in Coachella

4. Public Review Draft Housing Element

5. Next Steps for the Coachella Housing Element Update

6. Questions and Discussion
Format
The public workshop was facilitated by City staff, with a presentation from LWC. Due to COVID19 conditions, the meeting was held virtually via Zoom. Public participants were able to access the meeting by computer or by phone in English or Spanish. Participants were encouraged to provide feedback on the presentation and Housing Element document verbally at the meeting or by Zoom comment box. Over 20 people virtually attended the public workshop.

The City prepared a community workshop notice in English and Spanish that was published on the project website, Coachellahousingelement.com and distributed by the City. (see below).

E3.- Public Workshop

Page 725 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 2 The City remains available to accept comments or answer questions via phone or email.

Page 726 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 3 Summary of Comments
The following is a summary of questions and comments from members of the public and the subsequent discussion held during the public workshop:
• How can interested persons participate in the Housing Element Update process? There are many ways to participate in the Housing Element Update process. The steering committee meetings included non-profit and for-profit developers, faith-based groups, and the housing authority, among others. This workshop is another way to participate.

Additional opportunities for participation include the November 8, 2021, 5 p.m. City Council and Planning Commission study session and an upcoming online survey (expected the week of October 25, 2021)
• What does “affordable housing” mean? “Affordable” is a technical term that refers to the amount of income spent on housing (no more than 30%) relative to income categories set by the State (e.g., Extremely Low, Very Low, Low, Moderate) based on a region’s Area Median Income (AMI), in this case, for Riverside County. The AMI metric is often used on the scale of the household, instead of on the scale of individual persons. Affordable housing generally includes below market-rate housing and can come in a variety of all kinds of building types, including duplexes, courtyard housing, and apartments. • How is the City ensuring that Coachella residents won’t be displaced, including lowincome persons of color? The City should look at inclusionary zoning ordinances, rent control, land trusts, and types of anti-displacement strategies. The idea behind a housing element update is to ensure that cities have enough space available to produce housing attainable to persons at all income levels, including below market-rate housing.

Many of the sites identified by the City that will be used for complying with the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) are on vacant land, so they will not remove existing housing. In addition, the program recommendations (e.g. anti-displacement strategies) will be included for consideration at the upcoming City Council and Planning Commission study session scheduled for November 8, 2021. • How will the City prevent segregation of neighborhoods based on income levels and the concentration of poverty? The City is sensitive to this issue. Pursuant to state law, the City will conduct an analysis to “affirmatively further fair housing” and investigate areas that may be segregated by income, race, etc. Once that analysis is complete, the City will be able to identify any pockets of concentrated poverty and see whether any lowincome housing sites are identified there, and develop programs or policies as appropriate.
• The City should have its Code Enforcement Division help rehabilitate existing housing, such as small loans for residents to make repairs. The City does provide a Residential Rehabilitation Program to residents (as funding is available), and will continue to advertise this on its website, share information with service organizations, and post information in City Hall. Please also see Program 2.1 of the Housing Element Update.

Page 727 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 4 • Does the Housing Element Update consider climate goals and proximity to transit in its analyses? Yes, the Housing Element Update promotes housing near jobs and transit to reduce climate impacts that occur on account of commutes.

Page 728 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 1 City of Coachella
6th Cycle Housing Element Update
City Council/Planning Commission Joint Study Session
Monday, November 8, 2021, at 5:00 pm
Zoom Webinar and In-Person at the Coachella City Hall Council Chambers Introduction
On November 8, 2021, the City of Coachella (City) hosted an in-person/virtual joint City Council/Planning Commission study session for the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update project.

Mayor Steven Hernandez opened the meeting and introduced Gabriel Perez, Community Development Director, who explained the intent of the study session was to review the draft Housing Element Update, as well as to receive comment and answer questions. The presentation was available in English and live Spanish translation. Director Perez introduced the Consultant Team, Lisa Wise Consulting Inc. (LWC). Kathryn Slama, Senior Associate and project manager, and David Bergman, Director, presented on behalf of LWC. The presentation addressed the following topics:

1. Housing Element Overview

2. Process and Public Outreach

3. Housing Needs and Conditions in Coachella

4. Public Review Draft Housing Element

5. Public Workshop

6. Next Steps for the Coachella Housing Element Update

7. Questions and Discussion
Format
The study session was facilitated by Mayor Hernandez, Planning Commission Chair Virgen, and Director Perez, with a presentation from LWC. Due to COVID-19 conditions, the meeting was held virtually via Zoom with the option for in-person attendance at the Coachella City Hall Council Chambers. Public participants were able to access the meeting by computer or by phone in English or Spanish. Participants were encouraged to provide feedback on the presentation and Housing Element document verbally at the meeting or by Zoom comment box. Over 15 people attended the study session via Zoom.

The City noticed the study session on the City’s website and according to standard public meeting procedures.

E4.- Study Session

Page 729 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 2 The meeting was recorded and posted on the City’s webpage (https://coachellaca.swagit.com/play/11092021-715) so it may be viewed at any time. The City remains available to accept comments or answer questions via phone or email.

Summary of Comments
The following is a summary of questions and comments from both City Council and Planning Commission members, as well as questions and comments from members of the public. Three emails were also entered into the record.
• Elected and appointed officials want to receive Housing Element Update materials sufficiently in advance of meetings to be more prepared. • Does the fact that the median income in Riverside County is higher than the median income in Coachella present opportunities for Coachella? While grants and other funding for affordable housing are very competitive, the relative lower income of Coachella residents is a factor that could help proposed affordable housing projects in Coachella score higher for receiving funding or tax credits from programs through Riverside County or the State. Additionally, because the income limits are based on County-wide figures, a larger proportion of Coachella’s households will qualify for below market rate housing. • The City should look at its last (5th cycle) housing element update to see how it has been recently promoting affordable housing. The City has 560 units in the pipeline; 106 currently under construction. Let’s promote our successes. The City does look at how it has performed over the last housing cycle through its current housing element

Page 730 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 3 update. The housing element update will highlight how many affordable units have been built since the start of the last housing cycle.
• Affordable housing units in the City should be high-quality. Coachella residents that live in affordable housing units should not feel inferior to other residents, especially because of the quality of their housing. We want residents to feel at home and not segregated. While capacity constraints such as lot coverage restrictions can negatively impact the profitability of housing projects, and therefore in part the type of materials used for construction of affordable housing units, the Housing Element Update team will work to ensure affordable housing is not distinct from market-rate housing. The City can consider programs to require projects to provide the same type of fixtures and appliances for market rate and affordable units.
• The City needs to update its Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map to be consistent with its General Plan. The City currently is circulating a request for qualifications (RFQ) to this effect.
• The City should address senior housing needs, both in the short and long term.

Senior housing should be near amenities, as some senior may not have reliable transportation or may not be able to drive. The City should also streamline senior housing projects.
• The City should ensure sufficient housing for veterans and needs to collaborate with developers to build affordable housing.
• Housing prices continue to increase, whereas household incomes are remaining stagnant in Coachella. What can be done to combat this? The housing element is a roadmap for the production of affordable housing units, or the supply side of housing.

While access to high paying employment is a challenge, the housing element does not address this directly. Moreover, the City is looking into how to reduce governmental constraints that artificially increase the cost of housing, such as particular minimum lot sizes.
• Although the City has high homeownership rates, most homeowners in Coachella are cost-burdened by the cost of their housing. This is a problem for families. • The City should consider adopting an inclusionary zoning ordinance. • The City should encourage different types of housing (e.g., “missing middle” housing). This includes condominiums and fourplexes, etc. These types of housing should also be near amenities, such as access to medicine, jobs, churches, and counseling centers. We can look at the Zona Central between Avenue 50 and 52 to continue the grid. The housing element update promotes a diversified housing stock— everything from detached single-family housing to missing middle housing to federally subsidized, traditional affordable housing. The Housing Element acknowledges that access to amenities is an important factor in remaining competitive for subsidies and grant

Page 731 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 4 funds for affordable housing and will continue to work with developers to align sites for housing with high opportunity areas.
• Can the City require that first-time homebuyers have priority over others when submitting offers to purchase a home? The housing element team is not aware of any such programs in California. First-time homebuyer programs do exist where cities provide access to low interest rates or other types of funding, or education programs for first-time homebuyers. In some cities, first-time homebuyers experience difficulties in buying housing when they must compete with short-term rentals. The City does participate in a first-time homebuyer assistance program through Riverside County. • The City should consider a bond instrument, community revitalization investment authority, a transit occupancy tax, and/or inclusionary zoning geared towards housing. The City should also incentivize developers to build affordable housing, and increase fees for developers that don’t build it.
• The City should streamline affordable housing projects (have a quick turnaround time for plan check and reviews).

Screenshots
Screenshots from the Public Hearing are included below:

Page 732 ends

Item 27.

Lisa Wise Consulting, Inc. | City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element Update | 5 Page 733 Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-1 Appendix F: Affirmatively Furthering
Fair Housing (AFFH)
Contents
Appendix F: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH).......................F-1 Section F.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................F-2 F.1.1 Notes on Figures and Analysis...........................................................................F-2 Section F.2 Assessment of Fair Housing...............................................................................F-2 F.2.1 Fair Housing Outreach and Enforcement...........................................................F-2 F.2.2 Integration and Segregation ...............................................................................F-5 F.2.3 Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty ..................................F-1614 F.2.4 Access to Opportunity ..................................................................................F-2118 F.2.5 Disproportionate Housing Needs..................................................................F-3028 F.2.6 Other Relevant Factors ................................................................................F-3835 F.2.7 Summary of Fair Housing Issues .................................................................F-4137 Section F.3 Sites Inventory..............................................................................................F-4238 F.3.1 Potential Effects on Patterns of Segregation..................................................F-440 F.3.2 Potential Effects on Access to Opportunity ....................................................F-473 Section F.4 Contributing Factors and Meaningful Actions.................................................F-516

Page 734 ends

Item 27.

F-2 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Section F.1 Introduction
Assembly Bill 686, signed in 2018, establishes a statewide framework to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH) with the goal of achieving better economic and health outcomes for all Californians through equitable housing policies. AB 686 requires cities and counties to take deliberate actions to foster inclusive communities, advance fair and equal housing choice, and address racial and economic disparities through local policies and programs. Housing elements are now required to address the following five components:
• Inclusive and Equitable Outreach: A summary of fair housing outreach and capacity that includes all economic segments of the community.
• Assessment of Fair Housing: An assessment of fair housing issues, including integration and segregation patterns, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs for all identified populations
• Analysis of Sites Inventory: An evaluation of whether the sites inventory of the Housing Element improves or exacerbates conditions for fair housing. • Identification of Contributing Factors: The identification and prioritization of contributing factors related to fair housing issues.
• Priorities, Goals, and Actions to AFFH: The identification of fair housing goals and actions that directly address the contributing factors outlined above. The housing element should include metrics and milestones for evaluating progress and fair housing results.

This section documents four of the five components of the AFFH components. The summary of AFFH-related outreach is included in Appendix E.

F.1.1 Notes on Figures and Analysis
This Appendix contains geospatial data downloaded from HCD’s AFFH Data and Mapping Resources Hub. Additional analysis is sourced from the Census American Community Survey (ACS) and HCD’s pre-certified data, where appropriate.

Section F.2 Assessment of Fair Housing
F.2.1 Fair Housing Outreach and Enforcement
Fair housing complaints can be an indicator of housing discrimination. Fair housing issues can arise through discrimination against an individual based on the protected classifications of disability, race, national origin, familial status, disability, religion, or sex when renting or selling a dwelling unit.

Page 735 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-3 The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) is the federal agency responsible for eliminating housing discrimination, promote economic opportunity, and achieve diverse, inclusive communities. FHEO services and activities include investigating fair housing complaints, conducting compliance reviews, ensuring civil rights in HUD programs, and managing fair housing grants.

The City refers residents to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County and the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) to provide fair housing services for its residents. The Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) provides fair housing services to urban and unincorporated areas of Riverside County including Coachella. IFHMB offers training workshops and presentations about fair housing laws and the services and resources available through the agency. Workshops and presentations are offered for housing providers, city staff, and the public throughout the year. Topics covered in these workshops include federal and state fair housing laws, examples of discriminatory activities, suggested actions to avoid discrimination complaints, and providing resources such as brochures and other literature. The city provides residents with an online form through their website that allows people to submit fair housing complaints for a quick response time.

The City will maintain this partnership and will provide information regarding available fair housing services on the City’s website. The fair housing services provided by both the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County and IFHMB include providing information, investigation, education, conciliation, and/or referrals of housing discrimination complaints free of charge to individuals. It also provides fair housing workshops that are offered year-round to educate housing providers, tenants, homeowners, and financial and lending institutions on the key aspects of fair housing law. Further, their mediation departments provide information to landlords, tenants, mobile home park owners, and mobile home residents regarding their rights and responsibilities under the California Landlord and Tenant Laws, and facilitates negotiations between parties in housingrelated disputes.

This section discusses the fair housing services available to residents in the City and the corresponding organizations that provide fair housing services to both providers and consumers of housing, as well as the nature and extent of fair housing complaints received by the fair housing provider. In general, fair housing services include investigating and resolving housing discrimination complaints; discrimination auditing and testing; and education and outreach, such as disseminating fair housing information through written materials, workshops, and seminars.

The City refers residents to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County and the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) to provide fair housing services for its residents by disseminating educational information, performing investigations, local conciliation, and/or referrals of housing discrimination complaints free of charge to individuals. It also involves fair housing community workshops that are offered year-round to educate housing providers, tenants, homeowners, and financial and lending institutions on the key aspects of fair housing laws. From 2015 through 2017, the IFHMB provided fair housing services to 45 City residents. Of these individuals, 97 percent were lower-income earners. The largest race/ethnic group that was

Page 736 ends

Item 27.

F-4 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing provided fair housing services were Hispanic people. Through these, the City is well able to effectively disseminate fair housing resources and educational material through community outreach and other fair housing services provided to the residents of the City.

According to the California Department of Employment and Fair Housing, from 2009 through 2013, there were 17 fair housing cases in the City. Within this period, the highest number of fair housing cases filed were on the basis of race/color, resulting in 9 cases, followed by familial status with seven cases. Sexual orientation and having a national origin from Mexico had zero housing cases filed within the same period. Further, data from the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s (HCD) AFFH data viewer tool shows that from 2013 to 2021 there were fewer than 0.5 fair housing equal opportunity inquiries per 1,000 people in the City, as reported by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. This includes 23 total inquiries within the 2013-2021 period of which one was on the basis of disability, one on the basis of race, two on the basis of familial status, one on the basis of sex, and the rest were uncategorized. The disposition count for these inquiries was zero, while most were categorized as a failure to respond or to not be a valid issue. Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) data indicate that six inquiries were made in the City from Jan. 2013 to March 2021 on account of familial status (1), national origin (2), and no reason listed (3). The city does not have any pending lawsuits, enforcement actions, judgements, settlements, or findings related to fair housing and civil rights. There are no known fair housing lawsuits in the City.

City enforces fair housing and complies with fair housing laws and regulations through a twofold process: review of local policies and codes for compliance with State law, and referral of fair housing complaints to appropriate agencies. The City complies with State and federal housing laws as follows:
• Fair Housing Act; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – the City complies by ensuring its actions related to housing are not discriminatory through City protocols, decisionmaking procedures, and adhering to non-discrimination requirements of federal funding programs.
• American Disabilities Act – the City complies with the ADA through building permit review and issuance and as described in Appendix C (Housing Constraints, Section C.2.2, Housing for Persons with Disabilities).
• California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and FEHA Regulations – the City complies with FEHA and its regulations through referrals to legal assistance organizations, such as Fair Housing Council of Riverside County and the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB). The Housing Element includes policies and programs to continue to provide Fair Housing information in person and online, educate landlords and tenants regrading Fair Housing laws and tenant rights.
• Review Process (Government Code Section 65008) – The City Zoning Code is written to ensure that the City reviews affordable development projects in the same way as

Page 737 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-5 market-rate developments except in cases where affordable housing projects are eligible for preferential treatment. City’s actions regarding the development of housing for persons and families of very low, low, moderate, and middle incomes, or emergency shelters for the homeless, are not discriminatory. Programs are included in this Housing Element to facilitate housing for all households, including protected classes (e.g., programs regarding group homes, emergency shelters, and reasonable accommodation procedures). • Assembly Bill 686 (Government Code Section 8899.50) – Appendix F of this Housing Element documents compliance with Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing requirements. • Equal Access (Government Code Section 11135 et. seq.) – the City complies with antidiscrimination requirements by offering translation services for all public meetings and offers accessibility accommodations to ensure equal access to all regardless of membership or perceived membership in a protected class. • Density Bonus Law (Government Code Section 65915) – the City implements a density bonus program, as described in Appendix C (Housing Constraints) The Housing Element includes a program to ensure the City complies with recent updates to the Density Bonus Law.
• Senate Bill 35 (Government Code Section 65913.4). The Housing Element includes a program to comply with SB 35 by establishing a written policy or procedure, as well as other guidance as appropriate, to streamline the approval process and standards for eligible projects.
• Housing Accountability Act (Government Code Section 65589.5) – the City complies with the HAA by following established review periods and timelines. Housing Element includes programs to develop objective design standards to facilitate non-discretionary review of housing projects in compliance with the HAA.
• No-Net-Loss Law (Government Code Section 65863) – the City has documented compliance with sufficient capacity for RHNA, with a surplus capacity of over 3,000 units across all income categories. The City will ensure compliance with no-net-loss via required annual reporting to HCD.

F.2.2 Integration and Segregation
This section analyzes integration and segregation, including patterns and trends, related to populations with protected characteristics.

Race and Ethnicity
According to the United States Census, American Community Survey (ACS), approximately 72 percent of the Coachella population belonged to a racial minority group in 2019 (this is the most recent year that data is available). Coachella has more non-white racial and ethnic groups than Riverside County where this population comprises about 40 percent of the County’s total

Page 738 ends

Item 27.

F-6 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing population. Coachella has fewer White residents at about 28 percent of the population than the county at about 60 percent. In Coachella, 98 percent of the population of is Hispanic or Latino (of any race), compared to 48 percent of the population of Riverside County (see Appendix A, Housing Needs Assessment, Section A.2.3).

Figure F-1 provides Coachella’s historic non-white population percentages by block group from 2010 census data. Two block groups had non-white populations at that time that were between 21 and 40 percent and two block groups had percentages between 61 and 80 percent. The rest of the city at that time was in the 41 to 60 percent range. Surrounding areas of the city had similar levels of non-white populations in the 2010 census data.

Figure F-2 shows the non-white population percentage by census block group for 2018. The majority of block groups in the city had non-white populations above 80 percent. One block group in the northern portion of the city had a non-white population percentage of about 35 percent, one block group in the west had a non-white population of about 55 percent, and one block group had a non-white population of about 64 percent to the east.

The city had higher percentages of non-white population overall in 2018 as compared to 2010 according to census data. The 2018 ACS data showed an increase in non-white population percentages in all block groups in the city over 2010 levels. Coachella contains a racial and ethnic composition that is different from the region with a higher proportion of non-white population than the county, but it has a similar racial and ethnic composition to the block groups adjacent to the city.

Page 739 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-7 Figure F-1: Non-White Population Percentage (2010)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Page 740 ends

Item 27.

F-8 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-2: Non-White Population Percentage (2018)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Disability
People are considered to have a disability if they have one or more of the following: hearing difficulty, vision difficulty, cognitive difficulty, ambulatory difficulty, self-care difficulty, and independent living difficulty. Figure F-3 presents the census data for 2010 and 2014 for percentage of population with a disability and Figure F-4 shows the ACS 2015 to 2019 data for percentage of population with a disability.

According to the 2015 to 2019 ACS, approximately 8.0 percent of Coachella residents had a disability at that time, compared to 11.6 percent countywide (Table F-1). About half of Coachella’s census tracts had less than 10 percent of residents experiencing disability while the other half had between 10 and 20 percent during both five-year time periods. The distribution of this population is not appreciably different from the block groups adjacent to the city.

Page 741 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-9 Table F-1: Percentage of Population with a Disability (2019) Year Coachella Riverside County
Number Percentage Percentage
2019 3,635 8.0% 11.6%
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table S1810
Figure F-3: Percentage of Population with a Disability (2010 - 2014) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Page 742 ends

Item 27.

F-10 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-4: Percentage of Population with a Disability (2015 - 2019) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Familial Status
Familial status refers to the presence of at least one child under 18 years old. Examples of familial status discrimination include refusal to rent to families with children, eviction of families once a child joins, confinement of families to specific floors of a building, and overly restrictive rules regarding children’s use of common areas.

According to the 2015 to 2019 ACS, 31.0 percent of households in Coachella have one or more children under the age of 18. The city’s share of households with children present is lower than that of the county overall at 37.6 percent. It is higher than the surrounding neighboring jurisdictions of Indio (26.6 percent), La Quinta (23.9 percent), and Palm Desert (16.8 percent). Approximately

18.6 percent of married-couple households in Coachella have one or more children under the age of 18 versus 23.4 percent in the county overall (Table F-2).

Figure F-5 shows the approximate distribution of children in married couple households in Coachella. The estimated percentages of children residing within married couple households are

Page 743 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-11 highest in northern and western portions of the city at over 80 percent according to the most recent ACS data. This estimate ranges from about 53 percent to about 78 percent in other census tracts of the city.

Single parent households are also a fair housing protected class. Coachella has 5.3 percent of households comprised of male or female single-parent households with children. Female-headed households are of particular concern because they may experience greater housing affordability challenges due to typically lower household incomes compared to two-parent households. An estimated 4.8 percent of households in Coachella are single female-headed households with children (Table F-3).

As shown in Figure F-6, Coachella has some variability in the estimated percentages of children in single female-headed households. The number of children in female-headed households varies across the city from about 9 percent in the north to about 30 percent in the southern portion according to the ACS data.

Table F-2: Percentage of Married-Couple Households with Children Year Coachella Riverside County
2019 18.6% 23.4%
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table DP02
Table F-3: Percentage of Female-Headed Households with Children, No Spouse/Partner Present Year Coachella Riverside County
2019 4.8% 5.1%
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table DP02

Page 744 ends

Item 27.

F-12 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-5: Children in Married-Couple Households (2015 - 2019) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Page 745 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-13 Figure F-6: Children in Female-Headed Households with No Partner Present (2015 - 2019) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Income
According to the 2015 to 2019 ACS, the median household income in Coachella is $34,224, which is about half of the Riverside County median of $67,005 over the same period. Median household incomes in Coachella and Riverside County for 2019 are presented in Table F-4.

Figure F-7 displays the distribution of median household income by census block group in Coachella. Variations in household income are observed in adjacent block groups in the city with five block groups exhibiting median household income levels below $30,000. Most of the city has incomes in the $30,000 to $55,000 range, below the 2020 state median income of $87,100. One overlapping census block in a western portion of the city contains the next highest median income range ($55,000 to $87,100).

Page 746 ends

Item 27.

F-14 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Table F-4: Median Household Income
Year Coachella Riverside County
2019 $34,224 $67,005
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table S1901
Figure F-7: Median Household Income (2015 - 2019)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Low to Moderate Income Households
Figure F-8 displays income distribution across Coachella by showing the estimated percentage of low to moderate (LMI) income households by census tract. Most of the tracts in Coachella have more than 50% LMI households. The percentages within these tracts rage from 54 to 71 percent.

Two tracts that extend beyond city limits to the north and west contain approximately 22 percent and 17 percent of LMI households, respectively. Levels of LMI households are similar to Coachella to the north, east, and south of the city and generally lower to the west of the city. This

Page 747 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-15 pattern reflects the general trend within the Coachella Valley of the number of LMI households increasing from southwest to northeast.

Figure F-8: Low to Moderate Income Population (2011 – 2015) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Income is also disaggregated by race and ethnicity to further understand local patterns of segregation and integration. The poverty rates among racial and ethnic groups in Coachella and Riverside County are presented in Table F-5. Although the citywide poverty rate was 21.8 percent in 2019 compared to 13.7 percent for Riverside County, not all racial and ethnic groups in Coachella have the same likelihood of experiencing poverty.

The data presented in Table F-5 shows that city residents identifying as “Some Other Race” alone have the highest poverty rate of 24.3 percent as compared to 11.4 percent in the county (second lowest). Note that it is a common occurrence in communities with large Hispanic populations to select “Some Other Race”, as the distinction between race and ethnicity is sometimes unclear to census respondents. White residents have a poverty rate of 17.0 percent and make up 27.8 percent of the city population. These two groups combined account for approximately 98 percent

Page 748 ends

Item 27.

F-16 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing of the city population. The poverty rate for Hispanic or Latino individuals of any race in Coachella is 22.0 percent and this group constitutes 97.3 percent of the city population.

Black, American Indian, and two or more race residents experience poverty at high rates relative to their share of the population. These groups each represent less than 1 percent of the population but they each have poverty rates of about 5 percent according to ACS data.

Table F-5: Poverty by Race/Ethnicity (2019)
Race/Ethnicity
Coachella Riverside County
Number in
Poverty Poverty Rate % of Total Population Poverty Rate Total population below poverty
level estimate 9,814 21.8% - 13.7%
White alone 2,130 17.0% 27.8% 12.0%
Black or African American alone 13 4.9% 0.6% 17.5%
American Indian and Alaska Native
alone 21 5.4% 0.9% 20.8%
Asian alone 0 0.0% 0.3% 11.3%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific
Islander alone 0 0.0% 0.0% 13.0%
Some Other Race alone 7,632 24.3% 69.7% 18.2%
Two or more races 18 5.5% 0.7% 11.4%
Hispanic or Latino origin (of any
race) 9,683 22.0% 97.3% 16.7%
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table S1701
F.2.3 Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAP) are areas that exhibit both high racial/ethnic concentrations and high poverty rates. HUD defines R/ECAPs as census tracts with a majority non-white population (50 percent or more) and a poverty rate that exceeds 40 percent or is three times the average poverty rate for the county, whichever is lower.

R/ECAPs may indicate the presence of disadvantaged households facing housing insecurity and need. They identify areas whose residents may have faced historical discrimination and who continue to experience economic hardship, furthering entrenched inequities in these communities.

Figure F-9 shows the portions of Coachella identified as R/ECAPs, with Census tracts labelled, alongside the location of schools, parks, and public transit routes. Coachella contains portions of two Census tracts identified as R/ECAP areas: Tract 456.09 and Tract 457.05.

Page 749 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-17 Figure F-9: Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (2009 - 2013) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Tract 457.05
Tract 457.05 is more densely populated and entirely within City limits, allowing for a more accurate analysis of demographic characteristics as they relate to Coachella residents and fair housing problems. Table F-6 provides a summary of selected demographic characteristics and AFFH indicators for this tract.

Tract 456.09
Tract 456.09 covers two sections to the City’s south and east, with most of its area outside City boundaries. The portions of Tract 456.09 within the City are still sparsely-populated; as of 2022, the area between the Whitewater River and the Coachella Canal is almost entirely zoned for agricultural and commercial uses, while the area bisected by Highway 111 is zoned almost

Page 750 ends

Item 27.

F-18 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing entirely for manufacturing or heavy industrial use.1 There is limited transit access and schools in this tract. This tract’s R/ECAP status is likely the result of it containing several disadvantaged unincorporated communities (DUCs) directly outside City limits (Shady Lane, Cocopah, Thermal, and Fillmore Street; also see Appendix B, Section A.3.5) and unpermitted, informal mobile home parks.2It also contains land owned by the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians including the Tribe’s Augustine Casino, Temalpakh Farm, Cahuilla Ranch event venue.3 Portions of Tract 456.09 within City limits are identified as priority expansion areas as Coachella continues to grow. For example, Coachella’s General Plan includes policy direction to prioritize new residential development in the “Central Coachella Neighborhoods” subarea, envisioning a series of walkable, interconnected communities with a mix of housing types and amenities.

However, for current residents, this portion of the City still has very limited access to local services and amenities, which continue to be concentrated in older, western neighborhoods west of Highway 86. The transition of land use in this area and its incorporation into the City’s mobility and open space networks will address these concerns.

Table F-6: R/ECAP Analysis of Census Tract 457.05
Selected Demographic Characteristics (2019)
Total Population 9,353
Total Households 3,249
Average Household Size 2.88
Hispanic or Latino Origin (of any race) 97.9%
Median Age 32.5
Owner-Occupied Housing Units 43.6%
Renter-Occupied Housing Units 51.8%
AFFH Indicators
Integration and Segregation
Median Income $31,582
Poverty Rate 35.9%
Low/Moderate-Income Population 74.5%
Non-White Population 98.9%
Disability Rate 7.7%
1 City of Coachella, Official Zoning Map,
https://www.coachella.org/home/showpublisheddocument/8840/638015980867630000 (2022) 2 City of Coachella, General Plan Update, Land Use + Community Character (2015) 3 Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians, About Us. https://augustinetribe-nsn.gov/about-us/

Page 751 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-19 Table F-6: R/ECAP Analysis of Census Tract 457.05
Access to Opportunity
TCAC Opportunity Area Composite Score High Segregation & Poverty Job Proximity Index 3
CalEnviroScreen Score 54.1
Displacement Risk
Overcrowding Rate 25.0%
Renter Overpayment Rate 71.0%
Homeowner Overpayment Rate 47.1%
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates
Tract 457.05 shares many demographic characteristics with tracts elsewhere in the City as shown in other subsections of this Appendix. Nearly all households in this tract are Hispanic or Latino (of any race) at 97.9 percent and earn a median household income of $31,582, well below the County median, with a poverty rate of 35.9 percent. Household tenure is slightly majority renter-occupied (51.8 percent), and though both renters and homeowners experience high housing cost overpayment rates, a greater proportion of renter households (71 percent) experience a housing cost burden (see Section F.2.5 below for further analysis).

In the General Plan, Tract 457.05 is included in the “West Coachella Neighborhoods” subarea, which has seen a significant number of homes and retail centers built in recent decades. However, while some neighborhoods within this subarea are more walkable and built on a traditional street grid, Tract 457.05 is characterized by a “patchwork” development pattern that includes conventional subdivisions and auto-oriented roadways, reducing overall connectivity. General Plan policy encourages infill development of vacant and underutilized parcels and the retrofit of existing neighborhoods to promote walkability, slow traffic, and increase access to parks and recreational opportunities.

During the 5th Cycle Housing Element Update, six projects were identified as already entitled and have since been completed. As shown below in Section F.3 (Sites Inventory), further parcels in Tract 457.05 are identified in the 6
th Cycle’s Sites Inventory. Appendix B (Sites Inventory & Methodology) explores the anticipated affordability categories of these parcels in greater detail, but their development in-line with General Plan policies will enhance the services and amenities in this tract, which already features close proximity to several schools, Bagdouma Park, and the Route 8 SunLine bus which connects the neighborhood to the rest of the City (and a transfer point Downtown).

Page 752 ends

Item 27.

F-20 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAAs) Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAAs) are neighborhoods in which there are both high concentrations of non-Hispanic White households and high household income rates.

Based on research from the University of Minnesota Humphrey School of Public Affairs, RCAAs are defined as census tracts where 80 percent or more of the population is white, and the median household income is $125,000 or greater (which is slightly more than double the national median household income in 2016).

However, HCD has adjusted the RCAA methodology in consideration of California’s higher levels of diversity by lowering the white population percentage threshold to 50 percent. According to 2010 data available from HCD for this evaluation and provided in Figure F-10, Coachella has two census tracts are that are predominantly (greater than 50 percent) white majority where the population percentage gap between the next largest racial group is 33 percent in the north and 8 percent in the west, but these areas do not contain median incomes above $125,000 (Figure F7). Therefore, no census tracts within Coachella meet the criteria to be considered a RCAA.

Figure F-10: White Majority Tracts (2010)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Page 753 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-21 F.2.4 Access to Opportunity
One important component of fair housing is a neighborhood’s access to opportunity, which correlates relative place-based characteristics of an area, such as education, employment, safety, and the environment, with critical life outcomes, such as health, wealth, and life expectancy.

Ensuring access to opportunity means both investing in existing low-income and underserved communities, as well as supporting residents’ mobility and access to ‘high resource’ neighborhoods.

In February 2017, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) convened the California Fair Housing Task Force to provide research and evidence-based policy recommendations to further HCD’s fair housing goals of (1) avoiding further segregation and concentration of poverty and (2) encouraging access to opportunity through land use policy and affordable housing, program design, and implementation.

HCD and TCAC prepared opportunity maps to identify census tracts with the highest and lowest resources. High resource areas are areas with high index scores for a variety of opportunity indicators. Examples of indicators of high resources areas include high employment rates, low poverty rates, proximity to jobs, high educational proficiency, and limited exposure to environmental health hazards.

High resources tracts are areas that offer low-income residents the best chance of a high quality of life, whether through economic advancement, high educational attainment, or clean environmental health. Census tracts in the city that are categorized as moderate resource areas have access to many of the same resources as the high resource areas but may have fewer job opportunities, lower performing schools, lower median home values, or other factors that lower their indexes across the various economic, educational, and environmental indicators.

Low resources areas are characterized as having fewer opportunities to employment and education, or a lower index for other economic, environmental, and educational indicators. These areas have greater quality of life needs and should be prioritized for future investment to improve opportunities for current and future residents.

The opportunity maps inform TCAC, which oversees the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program, to distribute funding more equitably for affordable housing in areas with the highest opportunity. The analysis evaluates total access to opportunity and categorizes this access as high, moderate, or low, but also individually assesses opportunity access across more specific indicators, such as education, transportation, economic development, and environment.

Page 754 ends

Item 27.

F-22 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing TCAC Opportunity Areas – Composite Score
The 2021 TCAC Opportunity Areas Composite Score provides an aggregate index of three domains: economic, education, and environmental. Census tracts with higher composite scores indicate higher resource and higher opportunity areas overall. Coachella contains four composite score categories: moderate resource, low resource, high segregation and poverty, and missing/insufficient data (Figure F-11). Composite scores are in the moderate resource category in northern and western areas of the city. The high segregation and poverty areas are located in the southwestern portions of the city. Composite scores generally increase from east to west in the region.

Figure F-11: TCAC Opportunity Areas 2021 - Composite Score Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Page 755 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-23 Economic Score
The 2021 TCAC Opportunity Areas Economic Score for a census tract is based on poverty, adult education, employment, job proximity, and median home value indicators. The score is broken up by quartiles, with the highest quartile indicating more positive economic outcomes and the lowest score indicating least positive outcomes. Most of the city’s census tracts are in the lowest economic score quartile of 0.0 to 0.25 as shown in Figure F-12, indicating less positive economic outcomes for residents. Northern and western portions of the city have economic scores in the

0.5 to 0.75 range. Scores are generally different in Coachella than in the areas adjacent to the city. Economic scores generally increase from east to west in the surrounding areas.

Figure F-12: TCAC Opportunity Areas 2021 - Economic Score Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Page 756 ends

Item 27.

F-24 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Education Score
The 2021 TCAC Opportunity Areas Education Score for a census tract is based on math and reading proficiency, high school graduation rate, and student poverty rate indicators. The score is broken up by quartiles, with the highest quartile indicating more positive education outcomes and the lowest quartile signifying fewer positive outcomes. As shown in Figure F-13, the city mostly contains the lowest education score of less than 0.25 overall suggesting that students of various ages generally have less positive educational outcomes. One census tract in the northern portion of the city had education scores in the next higher quartile. Education scores are generally different in Coachella than in the areas to the east of the city with the scores generally increasing from east to west across the region.

Figure F-13: TCAC Opportunity Areas 2021 - Education Score Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Page 757 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-25 Environmental Score
Environmental scores for census tracts presented in Figure F-14 are based on 2021 TCAC Opportunity Areas Environmental Scores that reflect environmental risk. The scores are divided into quartiles with higher scores representing more positive environmental outcomes and lower scores indicating least positive environmental outcomes for residents living there. The city has a range of environmental scores with tracts in each quartile range indicating that residents are exposed to relatively higher or lower environmental risk factors depending on location (Figure F14). Environmental scores are relatively similar in Coachella when compared to the surrounding areas with the scores generally improving from east to west across the region.

Figure F-14: TCAC Opportunity Areas 2021 - Environmental Score Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Page 758 ends

Item 27.

F-26 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Jobs Proximity Index
HUD’s Jobs Proximity Index for a census tract measures the area’s distance from employment.

This index can be used as a proxy to indicate relative transportation needs in a community. The score is broken up by quintiles, with the highest quintile representing areas closest to job centers.

The Jobs Proximity Index score is varied across Coachella. The score improves in the central portion to the highest quintile indicating relatively closer proximity to job centers as shown in Figure F-15.

Figure F-15: Jobs Proximity Index (HUD, 2014 - 2017)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Disparities in Access to Opportunity for Persons with Disabilities People with disabilities often experience challenges with accessibility, discrimination, and housing choice that make it difficult to find suitable housing to meet their needs. This section analyzes such disparities to ensure the City is able to adequately serve its residents with disabilities.

According to the Needs Assessment (Appendix A, Figure A-23), the most common types of disabilities in Coachella in 2018 were ambulatory disabilities followed by cognitive disabilities.

Page 759 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-27 Disability categories are counted separately and are not mutually exclusive, as an individual may report more than one disability. An estimated 8.0 percent of Coachella residents (3,635 individuals) have a disability of some kind according to 2015 to 2019 ACS data.

The California Department of Developmental Services (DDS) currently provides communitybased services to approximately 350,000 persons with developmental disabilities and their families through a statewide system of regional centers, developmental centers, and communitybased facilities. DDS also provides data on developmental disabilities by age and type of residence. According to DDS and as shown in the Needs Assessment (Appendix A, Table A-8), there are about 784 residents with a development disability in Coachella with most of them (717) able to live in their own home with their family or guardian.

There are a variety of housing types appropriate for people with disabilities, such as licensed and unlicensed single-family homes, group homes, and transitional and supportive housing. The design of housing-accessibility modifications, proximity to services and transit, and the availability of group living opportunities represent some of the types of considerations that are important in serving this need group. The Housing Constraints Appendix (Appendix C) discusses how the city permits various housing types, including the allowance for reasonable accommodations.

The Inland Regional Center facility in the vicinity of Coachella provides support and services to people with disabilities, enabling them to live at home. The Inland Regional Center is one of 21 regional centers in California that provide point of entry to services for people with developmental disabilities in Riverside and San Bernadino Counties. The center is a private, nonprofit community agency that contracts with local businesses to offer a wide range of services to individuals with developmental disabilities and their families.

Disparities in Access to Transportation Opportunities
The HUD Low Transportation Cost Index is based on estimates of transportation costs for a family that meets the following description: a three-person single-parent family with income at 50 percent of the median income for renters for the region. These estimates originate from the Location Affordability Index (LAI). Transportation costs are modeled for census tracts as a percent of income for renters in these households.

Index values are inverted, and percentile ranked nationally, with values ranging from 0 to 100.

Higher index values indicate lower transportation costs in that neighborhood. Transportation costs may be low within a tract for a range of reasons, including greater access to public transportation and the density of homes, services, and jobs in that area.

Figure F-16 shows the Transportation Cost Index ranges in Coachella. The city contains two ranges of the index, the 21 to 39 quintile in the western portions of the city and the 40 to 58 quintile in the remaining areas. The index values in the western census tracts range from 34 to 39 indicating that those areas of the city are estimated to have lower transportation costs than that percentage (34 to 39) of the nation. Transportation costs are somewhat lower in other areas of the city (with higher index values).

Page 760 ends

Item 27.

F-28 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-16: HUD Low Transportation Cost Index
Source: HUD Spatial Data
Figure F-17 shows bus transit routes operated by SunLine Transit Agency that connect the City with other communities throughout the Coachella Valley. These bus routes include Route 1EV (connecting Downtown Coachella with the Palm Desert Mall via Highway 111 to the west), Route 6 (connecting Downtown Coachella with Palm Desert mall via Fred Warring Drive to the west), and Route 8 (which zig-zags through Coachella and connects it to Indio to the north and Thermal/Mecca to the south). According to the 2023-2025 Short Range Transit Plan:
“Routes 1, 6, and 9 currently connect at the Transfer Terminal at Vine Avenue and Fifth Street in Coachella. There are plans to develop a Coachella Mobility Hub at Fourth Street and Cesar Chavez Street, to open in January 2024. The Mobility Hub would provide a residential development, bus laybys, passenger amenities, and connecting pedestrian and bicycle paths. Following completion of the Mobility Hub, the current routes at the Vine Avenue Transfer Terminal should be refocused to service the Coachella Mobility Hub.

Frequency on Route 1 is proposed to increase to every 15 minutes upon completion of

Page 761 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-29 the mobility hub. Four additional buses have been procured to support this increased service on SunLine’s most productive route.”
Figure F-17: Transit Routes
The City’s existing bus routes provide moderate access to transit opportunities, especially for residents who need to commute to job centers elsewhere in the Coachella Valley. However, the Jobs Proximity Index illustrated above in Figure F-15 indicates that most populated regions of the City are still considered far from employment opportunities. Limited mobility options can have a greater impact on lower income populations and households who may not have access to alternate modes of transportation. Given the composition of Coachella, this means that lower income households and communities of color have limited transit access in Coachella. Continuing to implement General Plan policies related to infill development along key corridors will be essential to increasing the viability of new or expanded bus routes. For example, no cross-town bus routes currently link the City’s eastern and western neighborhoods, and such routes will be needed to connect the future neighborhood centers and industrial jobs centers envisioned by the General Plan, especially those east of Grapefruit Boulevard. A lack of transportation options throughout the City may otherwise restrict residents from accessing resources and opportunities not within their immediate neighborhoods.

Page 762 ends

Item 27.

F-30 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing F.2.5 Disproportionate Housing Needs
Overpayment
HUD defines overpayment, or “housing cost burden”, as households paying 30 percent or more of their gross income on housing expenses, including rent or mortgage payments and utilities.

Housing cost burden is considered a housing need because households that overpay for housing costs may have difficulty affording other necessary expenses, such as childcare, transportation, and medical costs.

Overpayment by Renters
Renters are more likely to overpay for housing costs than homeowners. As presented in the Needs Assessment (Appendix A), 70.3 percent of renters in Coachella are cost-burdened. The percentage of renter households experiencing cost-burden is highest in a southern census tract at about 80.4 percent and is in the 60 to 80 percent range in most of the city according to 2015 - 2019 ACS data (Figure F-18). According to the Needs Assessment (Appendix A), approximately

55.3 percent of renters in the SCAG region are cost-burdened.

Figure F-18: Overpayment by Renters (2015 - 2019)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Page 763 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-31 Overpayment by Homeowners
Homeowners generally experience a lower rate of cost burden than renters. Figures F-19 shows the percentages of homeowners experiencing overpayment in the 2015 to 2019 time period according to ACS data. Percentages of homeowners experiencing overpayment are highest at about 82.7 percent in a central census tract and between 60 and 80 percent in two adjacent tracts.

Between 40 and 60 percent of homeowners are cost-burdened in most areas of the rest of the city.

Figure F-19: Overpayment by Owners (2015 - 2019)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Overcrowding
Overcrowding is defined by the Census as a unit in which more than one person occupies a room (excluding bathrooms and kitchens) while severe overcrowding occurs when more than 1.5 people occupy a room. Overcrowded households are an indicator of housing needs, as lower income families or individuals may choose to live together in smaller spaces to save money on housing costs.

Page 764 ends

Item 27.

F-32 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing In addition to the strain on residents’ mental health, overcrowding can also lead to more rapid deterioration of the property due to increased usage. According to the 2015 to 2019 ACS data,

4.6 percent of households in Coachella experienced overcrowding and 1.4 percent experienced severe overcrowding. The city’s overcrowding rates are about the same as Riverside County at

5.1 percent and the city’s severely overcrowded rate is also much lower than the county’s 1.8 percent (Table F-7).

Table F-7: Overcrowding and Severe Overcrowding Rates (2019) Coachella Riverside County
Occupants Per Room Units Percentage Percentage

1.01 to 1.5 705 4.6% 5.1%

1.51 or more 215 1.4% 1.8%
Source: ACS 2019 5-Year Estimates, Table DP04
The distribution of overcrowded households in Coachella for the 2011 to 2015 time period are shown in Figure F-20. The map shows that overcrowding rates are highest in north-central and south-central census tracts, which are all above 20 percent. The statewide spatial data for severe overcrowding did not contain any values in the vicinity of Coachella as shown in Figure F-21.

Page 765 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-33 Figure F-20: Overcrowded Households (2011 – 2015)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data

Page 766 ends

Item 27.

F-34 | City of Coachella Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Figure F-21: Severely Overcrowded Households (2011 – 2015) Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Location Affordability Index
Figure F-22 shows the median gross rent across Coachella per HUD’s Location Affordability Index for the years 2012 to 2016. This index estimates household housing and transportation cost on a neighborhood-scale. These estimates show that most of the city has the lowest index value of less than $1,000. One census tract is between $1,000 and $1,500, and two tracts are between $1,500 and $2,000 per month.

This Needs Assessment (Appendix A) indicates the median monthly rent paid in Coachella in 2019 was $879 according to ACS 2015 to 2019 data. This rent amount is affordable to moderate income households but may be a cost-burden for lower-income households. It is less expensive to rent housing in Coachella than it is in Riverside County (Needs Assessment Appendix A, Figure A-24).

Page 767 ends

Item 27.

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing City of Coachella | F-35 Figure F-22: Location Affordability (2012 – 2016)
Source: HCD AFFH Spatial Data
Substandard Housing
Incomplete plumbing or kitchen facilities can be used as a proxy to indicate substandard housing conditions. According to the 2015 to 2019 ACS, 0.1 percent of Coachella households (17 units) lacked complete plumbing facilities and 0.3 percent of households (43 units) lacked complete kitchen facilities. Within Riverside County the number of households lacking each are 0.3 percent and 0.7 percent, respectively (Table F-8).

The age of housing stock can also be an indicator of substandard housing. As homes get older, there is a greater need for maintenance and repair. If not properly addressed, an aging housing stock can result in poorer living standards, incur more expensive repair costs and, under certain conditions, lower overall property values.

Coachella's housing stock is mostly newer than that of the SCAG region overall. According to the Needs Assessment (Appendix A), most of Coachella's housing units were built between 2000 and

Page 768 ends

Coachella City CouncilSeptember 13, 2023

Coachella City Council
September 13, 2023