Coachella City Council
September 13, 2023

City Hall Council Chamber
1515 Sixth Street, Coachella, California
(760) 398-3502  www.coachella.org
AGENDA

OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE

CITY OF COACHELLA

CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING

THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE COACHELLA SANITARY DISTRICT,

COACHELLA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COACHELLA FINANCING AUTHORITY,

COACHELLA EDUCATIONAL AND GOVERNMENTAL ACCESS CABLE CHANNEL CORPORATION,

COACHELLA WATER AUTHORITY, AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COACHELLA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY September 13, 2023
5:00PM – CLOSED SESSION
6:00 PM – REGULAR MEETING
In-Person Meeting
Location:

Coachella City Hall
Council Chamber
1515 Sixth Street
Coachella, CA
If you would like to attend the meeting via Zoom, here is the link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88457271898?pwd=REdzU1NoQmpVSFhWTDVaZ0VCekYxdz09 Or One tap mobile : 16699006833,,88457271898#,,,,*606140# Or Telephone:

US: +1 669 900 6833
Webinar ID: 884 5727 1898
Passcode: 606140
Spanish: El idioma español está disponible en Zoom seleccionado la opción en la parte de abajo de la pantalla
 Public comments may be received either in person, via email, telephonically, or via Zoom with a limit of 250 words, or three minutes:
o In Real Time:

If participating in real time via Zoom or phone, during the Public Comment Period, use the “raise hand” function on your computer, or when using a phone, participants can raise their hand by pressing *9 on the keypad.
o In Writing:

Written comments may be submitted to the City Council electronically via email to [email protected]. Transmittal prior to the start of the meeting is required. All written comments received will be forwarded to the City Council and entered into the record. o If you wish, you may leave a message at (760) 262-6240 before 5:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting.  The live stream of the meeting may be viewed online by accessing the city's website at www.coachella.org, and clicking on the "Watch Council Meetings" tab located on the home page, and then clicking on the "live" button.

Agenda City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting September 13, 2023

CALL TO ORDER: - 5:00 P.M.

ROLL CALL:

APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
“At this time the Council/ Board/Corporation/Authority may announce any items being pulled from the Agenda or continued to another date or request the moving of an item on the agenda” PUBLIC COMMENTS (CLOSED SESSION ITEMS):

ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION:

1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957(b)(1) 1)
Title: City Manager
Title: City Attorney

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant Exposure to Litigation, Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)/(e)(1) One (1) Potential Case

3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of Litigation, Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
One (1) Potential Case
RECONVENE REGULAR MEETING: - 6:00 P.M.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS:

PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS:

4. Center for Employment Training (CET) Presentation of Services

5. Proclamation Presented to Javier Figueroa

6. Presentation by RAICES Cultura on All Children Thrive California - Youth Development and Policy Work in the City of Coachella

7. Bagdouma and Veterans Memorial Parks Amenity Recommendations

8. Proclamation for Suicide Prevention Month

Agenda City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting September 13, 2023

9. Presentation by Raftelis for the Utilities Departments

10. Proclamation Recognizing Staff for their Service and Dedication Safety of The City of Coachella WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:

CONSENT CALENDAR:
(It is recommended that Consent Items be acted upon simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by a Council Member or member of the audience.)

11. Regular Meeting Minutes of July 26, 2023, of the City of Coachella, Coachella Sanitary District, Coachella Fire Protection District, Coachella Financing Authority, Coachella Educational and Governmental Access Cable Corporation, Coachella Water Authority, and Successor Agency to the Coachella Redevelopment Agency.

12. Special Meeting Minutes of August 7, 2023, of the City of Coachella, Coachella Sanitary District, Coachella Fire Protection District, Coachella Financing Authority, Coachella Educational and Governmental Access Cable Corporation, Coachella Water Authority, and Successor Agency to the Coachella Redevelopment Agency.

13. Special Meeting Minutes of August 23, 2023, of the City of Coachella, Coachella Sanitary District, Coachella Fire Protection District, Coachella Financing Authority, Coachella Educational and Governmental Access Cable Corporation, Coachella Water Authority, and Successor Agency to the Coachella Redevelopment Agency.

14. Adopt Ordinance No. 1206 - City of Coachella Objective Design Standards for Multi-family Residential and Mixed-Use development - Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 22-04 is a Proposal to Amend Coachella Municipal Code Title 17, Zoning, Adopting Objective Design Standards for Multi-family Residential Development to apply to G-N General Neighborhood, U-N Urban Neighborhood, DT-PV Downtown Pueblo Viejo, DT-PV Transition, U-E Urban Employment and Neighborhood Commercial zones.(Second Reading)

15. Professional Service Agreement with Heptagon Seven to develop final Plans, Specifications and Engineer’s Estimates for a Roundabout at Avenue 53 and Calle Empalme.

16. Addition Work Request (AWR) #1 for Engineering and Landscape Services associated with the Avenue 53 Tot Lot.

17. Investment Report for May and June, 2023

18. Authorize the City Manager to Execute Professional Services Agreements with Willdan, Interwest, and 4 Leaf, Inc. for Building Department Services

19. Award Amendment No. 1 to Construction Agreement with WGJ Enterprises Inc. (dba PCI) for the FY 2023-26 On-Call Striping Contract Project No. 083122, in the Amount not to Exceed $150,000

20. Authorize the City of Coachella’s Tacos, Tequila and Chavelas Festival Beer Garden Operation on October 21, 2023 at Veterans Memorial Park from 4 pm to 8 pm

Agenda City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting September 13, 2023

21. Voucher Listing- EFT's/Utility Billing Refunds/FY 2022-2023 and FY 2023-2024 Expenditures as of September 13, 2023, $8,506,206.42
NEW BUSINESS CALENDAR (LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE):

22. Sponsorship of Run With Los Muertos Event:
a) Sponsorship request from Eventscape International, Inc. for $35,000.00 for the 2023 Run With Los Muertos Event; and
b) Approval for operation of a beer garden on November 4, 2023 in Downton Sixth Street from 4:00 pm to midnight.

23. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Vintage Landscape to allow for Repair of Landscape Improvements at Rancho Las Flores Park Increasing Compensation of Agreement by an Additional $150,000

24. Provide Staff Direction for the 2023 Hometown Heroes Honorees

25. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-62 Authorizing the City Manager to Submit an Application to the Strategic Growth Council for the Community Resilience Centers Implementation Grant Program in the Amount of Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000) and Approve the Collaborative Stakeholder Structure, the Draft Partnership Agreement, and Execute All Related Grant Documents SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COACHELLA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY:

26. Resolution No. SA-2023-01, Approving the Last and Final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (LFROPS)
PUBLIC HEARING CALENDAR (QUASI-JUDICIAL):

27. City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element General Plan Amendment No. 21-02 and Environmental Assessment No. 22-03 for Consideration of the City of Coachella 6th Cycle Housing Element for 2021- 2029. City-Initiated
PUBLIC COMMENTS (NON-AGENDA ITEMS):

The public may address the City Council/Board/Corporation/ Authority on any item of interest to the public that is not on the agenda but is in the subject matter jurisdiction thereof. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes.

REPORTS AND REQUESTS:

Council Comments/Report of Miscellaneous Committees.

City Manager’s Comments.

ADJOURNMENT:

Agenda City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting September 13, 2023

Complete Agenda Packets are available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office at 53-462 Enterprise Way, Coachella, California, and on the City’s website www.coachella.org.

THIS MEETING IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

WHEREAS, a lifelong resident and proud CV High School graduate Javier Figueroa began serving the Parks and Recreation Commission on June 26, 2019; and WHEREAS, Javier served as a coach in the Coachella Youth Baseball & Softball Association (CYBSA) and has demonstrated his service to the community; and WHEREAS, during Javier’s tenure on the Parks and Recreation Commission he, was instrumental in resolving conflicts pertaining to field use requests by local sports leagues. He focused on ensuring community access and equitable allocation of park spaces; and WHEREAS, Javier also focused on connecting people to their community and establishing a sense of place; and
WHEREAS, Javier remains an advocate of Coachella’s parks and is excited to see the expansion of its park acreage as Coachella was a recipient of $8.5 million in State Prop 68 grants funds.

NOW THEREFORE, I, Steven A. Hernandez, Mayor of the City of Coachella, by the power vested in me, do hereby recognize
Javier Figueroa
and urge all citizens of the City of Coachella to thank him for serving on the Parks and Recreation Commission.

IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have hereunto set my
hand and caused the official seal of the City of
Coachella, California to be affixed this 13th day of
September, 2023.
______________________________________
Steven A. Hernandez, Mayor
City of Coachella, California

Item 5.

Landscape and Park
Amenity Recommendations
Bagoudma, Veterans Memorial Park, City Hall

Item 7.

Bagdouma Park – Horseshoe Pits
Proposed
• Construction Costs = $15k - $25k
• Total Sets = 4 - 6
• Maintenance Costs = $1k annually

Item 7.

Veterans Memorial Park – Flags
Existing Flags:

US, POW, Army, Marine Corps,
Navy, CA, Coachella
Missing Flags:

Space Force & Coast Guard

Item 7.

City Hall Small Fountain
Existing – Out of Service due to
vandalism
Proposed – Decorative Fountain Style
Planter

Item 7.

WHEREAS, in 2021, suicide was the 11th leading cause of death in the United States and the 2nd leading cause of death among individuals between the ages of 10 to 44 ; and WHEREAS, in the United States in 2021, there were an average of 132 suicides per day, resulting in over 48,000 suicides (Centers for Disease Control); and WHEREAS, the stigma associated with mental health conditions and suicidality works against suicide prevention by discouraging persons at risk for suicide from seeking life-saving help and further traumatizes survivors of suicide loss and people with lived experience of suicide; and WHEREAS, everyone has a role to play in preventing suicide and can learn suicide risks and warning signs and encourage those who struggle to seek help; ; and WHEREAS, organizations such as The American Foundation for Suicide Prevention envision a world without suicide, and are dedicated to saving lives and bringing hope to those affected by suicide, through research, education, advocacy and resources for those who have lost or struggle; and WHEREAS, everyone has a role to play in preventing suicide and can learn suicide risks and warning signs and encourage those who struggle to seek help.

NOW THEREFORE, I, Steven A. Hernandez, Mayor of the City of Coachella, by the power vested in me, do hereby recognize
Suicide Prevention Week
and urge all citizens of the City of Coachella to promote awareness that there is no single cause for suicide, and that suicide most often occurs when stressors exceed current coping abilities of someone suffering from a mental health condition.

IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and caused the official seal of the City of Coachella,
California to be affixed this 13th day of September 2023. _____________________________________
Steven A. Hernandez, Mayor
City of Coachella, California

Item 8.

CITY OF
Coachella
Utility Operations Staffing Study
Project Report / September 2023

Item 9.

CITY OF COACHELLA UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY
This page intentionally blank to facilitate two-sided printing.

Item 9.
19 Garfield Place, Suite 500 Cincinnati, OH 45202
www.raftelis.com
September 8, 2023
Bill Pattison
Finance Director
City of Coachella
53-990 Enterprise Way
Coachella, CA 92236
Subject: Utility Operations Staffing Study
Dear Mr. Pattison:

Raftelis is pleased to provide its Report on the Utility Operations Staffing Study of the City of Coachella Utilities Department. Providing utility services helps to preserve the health, environment, and prosperity of the community.

They are critically important; providing them efficiently and effectively ensures that customers get high value. It is commendable that the City has commissioned this assessment to build upon an already strong foundation. We believe that it will help the organization have continued success in addressing the community’s needs going forward.

This assessment evaluates the Utilities Department’s water and wastewater operations and identifies opportunities to enhance efficiency and effectiveness. It summarizes Raftelis’ analysis of staffing resources, organizational structures, technology, asset management, and related areas to develop recommendations.

Coachella is fortunate to have a Utilities Department that is staffed with people who care deeply about the community, are passionate about the environment, and committed to meeting customer expectations. There is a great deal of good work being done, and the recommendations in this report are intended to build upon and enhance these efforts.

Thank you for the opportunity to assist the City of Coachella. Please don’t hesitate to contact us at any time.

Sincerely,

Scott Parker Rebekka G. Hosken
Senior Manager Senior Manager

Item 9.

CITY OF COACHELLA UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY
This page intentionally blank to facilitate two-sided printing.

Item 9.

CITY OF COACHELLA UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................3 BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY.......................................................... 3 ABOUT THE COACHELLA UTILITIES DEPARTMENT .................................. 3 Structure...........................................................................................................................3 Core Services Matrix .......................................................................................................4 Staffing..............................................................................................................................5 Financial Condition..........................................................................................................6 PEER BENCHMARKING .......................................................................9 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................15 Staffing & Structure .......................................................................................................15 Operational Efficiency ...................................................................................................19 CONCLUSION......................................................................................25

Item 9.

CITY OF COACHELLA UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY
List of Tables
Table 1: List of Report Recommendations...............................................................................2 Table 2: Utilities Department Core Services ............................................................................5 Table 3: Utilities Department Authorized Staffing Level, FY2019 – FY2023 ..........................5 Table 4: Water Authority Fund Revenues by Category, FY2019 – FY2023 ............................6 Table 5: Water Authority Fund Expenditures by Category, FY2019 – FY2023 ......................6 Table 6: Sanitary District Fund Revenues by Category, FY2019-FY2023 ..............................7 Table 7: Sanitary District Fund Expenditures by Category, FY2019-FY2023 ........................8 Table 8: Peer Organization Information....................................................................................9 Table 9: Peer Organization Operational Statistics...................................................................9 Table 10: Benchmark Salary Comparison..............................................................................22 Table 11: Summary of Recommended Positions...................................................................25 List of Figures
Figure 1: Utilities Department Organizational Structure, FY2023...........................................4 Figure 2: Water Customer Accounts per Water FTE .............................................................10 Figure 3: Sewer Customer Accounts per Sewer FTE ............................................................11 Figure 4: MGD Water Produced per Water FTE......................................................................11 Figure 5: MGD Wastewater Collected per Wastewater FTE..................................................12 Figure 6: Miles of Water Main per Water FTE.........................................................................13 Figure 7: Miles of Sewer Main per Wastewater FTE ..............................................................13 Figure 8: Meter Reading Workflow..........................................................................................17

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 1
Executive Summary
The City of Coachella commissioned Raftelis to complete a study of the City’s Utilities Department to determine appropriate staffing levels under optimal performance conditions, as well as identify opportunities to enhance organizational efficiency and effectiveness. The recommendations in this report build upon the Department’s strengths, especially its impressive professional staff who take pride in providing high levels of service to the Coachella community. Raftelis used a combination of techniques to assess the Utilities Department staffing levels, organizational structure, and operational circumstances, including comparing Coachella’s utility operations to national and local peer utilities in southern California and gauging the effectiveness of various Utilities Department activities compared with industry best practices. Finally, we relied on our experience working with over 1,200 utilities of all sizes both in California and around the country.

The Utilities Department faces several challenges in delivering efficient and effective service; most importantly, low authorized staffing levels paired with significant employee turnover relative to the scope and scale of work undertaken by the department. As a result, some employees that remain are facing burnout. Additionally, like many utilities across California, Coachella competes with both neighboring municipalities and special utility districts for qualified staff and has experienced high levels of employee turnover. Backfilling these roles is especially difficult in the water and wastewater industry given the licenses required for many positions. This makes employee retention a high priority.

While filling current vacancies, particularly in the Water Authority, would likely boost productivity and morale, this report recommends that the Department needs additional positions in several areas to begin conducting proactive maintenance activities in accordance with industry best practices. Coachella currently performs little preventative maintenance (PM) or predictive maintenance on the City’s water and wastewater infrastructure. An increasing number of pipeline leaks and other asset failures force staff to spend their time reacting to pressing operational needs and limits their capacity to operate proactively, which poses considerable financial and operational risks going forward. Although the Department has shown resilience by continuing to deliver the current level of service in the face of these challenges, it will likely struggle to sustain that standard if these issues are not proactively addressed.

There are also various technological and resource challenges impacting operational efficiency. Examples include the presence of a significant number of water meters which cannot be accurately read via radio signal and require timeconsuming manual reads. The Department also does not consistently record maintenance information, limiting its ability to use data to set maintenance and capital planning priorities. Lack of heavy equipment and staff to run that equipment makes addressing operational failures, like main breaks, more difficult than would be the case if there were dedicated resources available. While the City’s Utilities staff do an excellent job minimizing the impact of these challenging circumstances, they must be addressed to sustain the high quality of service customers have come to expect.

To address the challenges listed above, Raftelis recommends both adding new positions in key operational areas and enhancing maintenance through greater utilization of progressive maintenance practices. Additionally, several recommendations propose ways to increase operational efficiency and effectiveness. The following table summarizes the list of recommendations proposed in this report.

Item 9.
2 CITY OF COACHELLA
Table 1: List of Report Recommendations
Number Recommendation
1 Create a Chief Treatment/Distribution Operator position in the Water Authority to increase management capacity.
2 Add a full-time Equipment Operator position to support Water and Sanitary maintenance activities. 3 Add three full-time treatment and/or distribution operator positions in the Water Authority. 4 Utilize temporary staff to perform meter reads until the transition to AMI is complete. 5 Add up to four full-time treatment and/or collections operator positions in the Sanitary District and build a dedicated Sanitary collections crew.
6 Move toward an asset management-based approach to infrastructure management. 7 Implement a rolling replacement budgeting cycle for equipment to perform preventative maintenance. 8 Conduct a focused compensation study of neighboring utilities including municipal and special utility districts.
9 Upgrade and expand the SCADA network that allows staff to remotely monitor the water and wastewater systems.
10 Add one full-time SCADA/Instrumentation Technician position to program and maintain the Department’s SCADA communications network.
11 Conduct a critical spares exercise to identify critical spare parts and components needed for operational equipment in both water and wastewater and then contract with a parts supplier to order and deliver commonly needed parts and components for water and sanitary assets.

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 3
Introduction
Background and Methodology
In September 2022, the City of Coachella engaged Raftelis to conduct a staffing study of the City’s Utilities Department. The goal of the study is to assess if the Department has the appropriate staffing levels and structure to achieve its current and future goals. This assessment also includes a review of the Department’s major functions and processes to identify opportunities to improve organizational workflows.

Raftelis conducted a kick-off meeting for the study in November 2022 with the Assistant to the City Manager, Finance Director, Utilities Director, Sanitary Superintendent, Water Superintendent, collective bargaining representatives, and consultant team. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the scope of the project, the City’s objectives, and to finalize the project schedule. Raftelis then submitted a data request to collect background information about various topics, including organizational structures, operations, and staffing elements. Raftelis reviewed numerous documents provided by the City, including:
• Organizational Charts
• Budget documents and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
• Staffing and personnel data
• Maintenance schedules and data
• Water production and wastewater collection data
• Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
To perform this study, individual interviews were conducted with the City’s Finance Director and five members of the Utilities Department’s leadership team. Group interviews were also conducted with staff from the Department’s different functional areas. Raftelis also visited the major water and wastewater treatment facilities to gain an understanding of their condition, as well as speak to staff about operations and maintenance practices. These tours included additional conversations with supervisory personnel and discussions with front line staff. After the visits, follow-up meetings and emails occurred with staff to clarify our understanding of the information provided, ask additional questions, and to discuss organizational structure and staffing options.

About the Coachella Utilities Department
As a full-service municipality, Coachella provides water and sanitary wastewater service to over 46,000 people across a 32 square mile service area. The Utilities Department provides for the treatment and distribution of potable water to over 9,000 residential, commercial, and industrial water service connections, as well as the collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater from more than 8,000 wastewater service connections. The City’s principal water supply is local groundwater pumped from six City-owned and operated wells, producing approximately 6.4 million gallons per day (MGD) of potable water distributed via 120 miles of pipeline. The sanitary system is comprised of one wastewater treatment plant designed to treat up to 4.5 MGD of wastewater to secondary standards, before being discharged into the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. The sanitary collection system that conveys wastewater from customers to the treatment plant consists of 90 miles of pipelines, two sewage pump stations, and over 1,600 manholes.

STRUCTURE
The Utilities Department is organized into three key functions: Administration, Water Authority (Water), and Sanitary District (Sanitary). The Department’s approved 2023 staffing level is 17.0 full-time equivalents (FTEs), including 3.0 Administration FTEs, 7.00 Water FTEs, and 7.00 Sanitary FTEs. The Water Authority consists of one

Item 9.
4 CITY OF COACHELLA
Water Superintendent who manages a team of six staff positions. The Sanitary District is overseen by a Sanitary Superintendent and one Chief Treatment/Collections Operator, who directly supervises five staff and reports to the Superintendent. The following figure outlines the Department’s organizational structure in FY2023.

Utilities Manager

1.0 FTE
Water Authority
Superintendent

1.0 FTE
Sanitary District
Superintendent

1.0 FTE
Environmental
Compliance
Program Manager

1.0 FTE
Assistant Engineer

1.0 FTE
Senior Water
Service Worker III

1.0 FTE
Senior Water
Service Worker IV

1.0 FTE
Water Service
Worker II

2.0 FTE
Chief Treatment/
Collections
Operator

1.0 FTE
Treatment Plant
Operator I

3.0 FTE
Treatment Plant
Operator II

2.0 FTE
Water Authority Sanitary District Administration
Water Service
Worker I

2.0 FTE
Figure 1: Utilities Department Organizational Structure, FY2023 An Administrative Assistant II position located in the Public Works Department provides approximately 25% support to the Utilities Department. An Environmental Compliance Inspector position in Administration has been shown in the Department’s budget but has not been filled nor funded.

CORE SERVICES MATRIX
The following table provides an overview of core services provided by the Utilities Department; it is not meant to be all-inclusive, but a summary of the main services provided by Utilities staff.

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 5
Table 2: Utilities Department Core Services
Department
Function Program Area Activities and Service Levels
Administration
Executive
Management
• Oversee Departmental operations to ensure service level expectations are met
• Communicate operational updates to City Manager, City Council, and stakeholders
• Participate in regional environmental initiatives
Regulatory
Compliance
• Track, manage, and report Departmental activities in accordance with applicable regulations
Project/Contract
Management
• Oversee all contracts with third party vendors
• Ensure all projects are delivered on-time and within budget Design &
Construction
Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP)
Implementation
• Provide engineering expertise and support to capital projects • Develop maintenance schedules and plans for lateral and vertical infrastructure
Water Treatment Water Treatment
• Operate the City’s six active groundwater wells
• Conduct regular water quality tests to ensure water meets acceptable drinking standards
• Inspect and maintain wellhouses and pump stations
Water Distribution Water Distribution
• Conduct maintenance of water mains, valves, and hydrants • Respond to water line breaks and leaks
• Perform flushing of water mains to ensure water quality Wastewater
Treatment
Wastewater
Treatment
• Operate the City’s wastewater treatment plant and perform maintenance and repairs as needed
• Inspect and maintain lift stations
Wastewater
Collection Wastewater Collection
• Conduct regular maintenance of sewer mains including televising and cleaning
• Respond to sanitary sewer overflows and blockages

STAFFING
Full-time administration and operations and maintenance (O&M) staffing has increased by 6% between FY2018 and FY2023, or a net increase of 1.0 FTE. This total does not account for the Utilities Department’s overhead allocations from other internal service departments within the City or shared positions. While staffing levels have remained stable in the Sanitary District during that time span, Administration dropped and then returned to the FY18 level with no net increase in positions, and the Water Authority added 1.0 FTE. The following table shows budgeted and approved staffing levels by division for the last six fiscal years.

Table 3: Utilities Department Authorized Staffing Level, FY2019 – FY2023 Division FY2018
Budget
FY2019
Budget
FY2020
Budget
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2023
Budget
Percent
Change
FY2019 –
FY2023
Administration 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 3.00 0%
Water Authority 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 17%
Sanitary District 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 0%
Total 16.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.50 17.00 6%
It should be noted that the Department has experienced numerous vacancies in recent years. While the Water Authority has 7.00 authorized positions, at the time of this review, only three positions (including the Superintendent) were filled. Staffing is supplemented by part-time temporary workers. Vacancies and staff retention are having a significant negative impact upon the Department’s ability to complete planned work.

Item 9.
6 CITY OF COACHELLA

FINANCIAL CONDITION
As is appropriate per government accounting standards, both the Water Authority and Sanitary District are accounted for as Enterprise Funds in the City’s books. Enterprise Funds are self-supporting funds that sell goods and services to the public for a fee and are considered business-type activities.

In summary, both funds are healthy and have revenues exceeding expenditures. The net position for both funds has been improving from past years; in fact, the City has resources available to further invest in the utilities as shown below.

Water Authority Fund
A review of the City’s most recent Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022, shows that the Water Authority had an increase in net position of $3,682,247 for FY2022. Table 4 below shows Water Authority revenues by category from FY2019 to FY2023.

Table 4: Water Authority Fund Revenues by Category, FY2019 – FY2023 Category FY2019
Actual
FY2020
Actual
FY2021
Actual
FY2022
Estimated
FY2023
Budget
Percent
Change
FY2019 –
FY2023
Utility Service
Revenue $6,221,940 $5,991,611 $6,370,803 $6,851,756 $6,200,000 -0.35% Connection Fees $19,670 $22,474 $795,862 $21,461 $592,500 2912.20% Ground Water
Replenishment $433,729 $437,331 $459,736 $502,319 $550,000 26.81% Other Charges for
Service $165,131 $97,450 $43,557 $64,020 $115,000 -30.36% Investment $162,734 $218,918 ($10,683) ($214,583) $0 -100.00% Intergovernmental
Revenues $154,666 $65,224 $92,011 $196,863 $100,000 -35.34% Total Revenues $7,157,870 $6,833,008 $7,751,286 $7,421,836 $7,557,500 5.58% As can be seen, most revenues are stable, with the most variability in connection fees and investment income and with an overall increase of 5.58% from FY2019 actuals to FY2023 budget.

Table 5 below details Water Authority Fund expenditures by category for the last five years.

Table 5: Water Authority Fund Expenditures by Category, FY2019 – FY2023 Category FY2019
Actual
FY2020
Actual
FY2021
Actual
FY2022
Estimated
FY2023
Budget
Percent
Change
FY2019 –
FY2023
Operating Costs $2,200,430 $2,622,740 $2,659,613 $2,796,019 $3,309,825 50.42% Administrative Costs $1,518,447 $2,031,019 $1,975,145 $1,904,069 $1,943,480 27.99% Depreciation &
Amortization $1,300,348 $1,300,348 $1,300,348 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 -7.72% Debt Service $483,642 $483,642 $483,642 $556,655 $509,437 5.33% Transfers Out $618,502 $618,502 $618,502 $601,436 $793,115 28.23% Total Expenditures $6,121,369 $7,056,251 $7,037,250 $7,258,179 $7,755,857 26.70%

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 7
Expenditures were more variable. Budgeted operating costs increased by 50% over FY2019 and transfers out increased by 28.23%. Operations increases included budgeting for replacement of vehicles and increasing costs of energy and staff salaries and overtime.

The fund’s total net position, the sum of all previous positive and negative annual changes to the bottom line, of $28,978,383 includes $5,3437,463 in unrestricted net position or “reserves” available for use without restriction. The Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) suggests a reserve level of 90 days’ (three months) of operating expenses. For the Water Authority, this would equal $861,584 (25% of annual operating expenses of $3,446,336).

The Water Authority’s unrestricted reserves of $5,347,463 are well above this amount and, in fact, are 155% of annual operating expenditures. FY2022 saw both an increase in operating revenues and a decrease in expenses, a large portion of which was due to the reduction of pension liability and associated expense. The City issued pension obligation bonds in 2020 to pay down the City’s pension liability.

Transfers out, which typically reimburse the City’s General Fund for the use of administrative staff such as legal, finance, or human resources personnel who support the utilities, were budgeted at $793,115 for FY2022-23 for the Water Authority, which is equivalent to 24.0% of Water Authority costs. In our experience, this is on the high end; as a point of comparison, the transfers out of other nearby municipal utilities for FY2022 are equal to 4.6% of expenditures for the City of Oceanside, 1.1% for the City of Redlands, and 1.1% for the City of Norco.

Sanitary District Fund
A similar review for the Sanitary District shows a positive change in net position of $4.1 million. FY2022 saw both an increase in operating revenues and a decrease in expenses, a large portion of which was due to the reduction of pension liability and associated expense. The City issued pension obligation bonds in 2020 to pay down the City’s pension liability.

Table 6 below shows Sanitary District Fund revenues by category for the last five years.

Table 6: Sanitary District Fund Revenues by Category, FY2019-FY2023 Category FY2019 Actual FY2020 Actual FY2021 Actual FY2022 Estimated
FY2023
Budget
Percent
Change
FY2019 –
FY2023
General
Revenue $183,787 $178,215 $172,514 $160,000 $99,000 -46.13% Connection
Fees $616,377 $729,354 $1,036,778 $930,000 $922,500 49.66% Utility Service
Revenue $5,866,814 $5,969,661 $6,657,982 $6,050,000 $5,850,000 -0.29% Investment
Income ($29,976) $47,911 ($1,223) $22,702 $17,027 -156.80% Other
Revenues $0 $42,966 $69,372 $0 $0 0.00%
Transfers In $219,675 $0 $0 $0 $0 -100.00%
Total
Expenditures $6,856,677 $6,968,107 $7,935,423 $7,162,702 $6,888,527 0.46% Table 7 below details Sanitary District Fund expenditures by category for the last five years.

Item 9.
8 CITY OF COACHELLA
Table 7: Sanitary District Fund Expenditures by Category, FY2019-FY2023 Category FY2019
Actual
FY2020
Actual
FY2021
Actual
FY2022
Estimated
FY2023
Budget
Percent
Change
FY2019 –
FY2023
Operating Costs $1,981,881 $2,134,986 $2,208,431 $2,677,555 $2,485,408 25.41% Administrative Costs $1,491,828 $1,447,857 $1,746,257 $1,610,687 $1,404,994 -5.82% Depreciation &
Amortization $1,390,971 $1,389,501 $1,394,418 $1,500,000 $1,450,000 4.24% Debt Service $650,684 $612,591 $606,339 $666,879 $614,964 -5.49% Transfers Out $570,968 $779,701 $941,259 $945,811 $798,920 39.92% Total Expenditures $6,086,332 $6,364,636 $6,896,704 $7,400,932 $6,754,286 10.97% Expenditures increased by 10.97% over 2019. Operating costs increased by 25%, including the costs of energy and employee salaries and overtime. Transfers out increased by 39.92% over 2019. The Sanitary Fund total net position of $21,514,454 includes $6,269,887 in unrestricted net position or “reserves” available for use. A reserve level of 90 days (three months) of operating expenses for the Sanitary District would equal $515,745 (25% of operating expenses of $2,062,980). The Sanitary District’s unrestricted reserves of $6,269,887 are well above this amount and, in fact, are 304% of annual operating expenditures.

Transfers out, which typically reimburse the City’s General Fund for the use of administrative staff such as legal, finance, or human resources personnel who support the utilities, were $798,920 for the Sanitary District, which is equivalent to 32.1% of operating costs.

The Sanitary District Fund’s health improved significantly between FY2021 and FY2022, from having a negative $1.2 million unrestricted net position to a positive $6.3 million, due to a combination of factors. First, the City eliminated significant pension liabilities and expenses by issuing a pension obligation bond. Second, $6.2 million in restricted net position for capital projects in FY2021 became unrestricted in FY2022; the nature of this change is unknown but contributed to the large increase in unrestricted net position for the year.

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 9
Peer Benchmarking
To inform this study, the City of Coachella identified five utility organizations in southern California to use as peers for benchmarking comparisons. These organizations are the Coachella Valley Water District, Indio Water Authority, Mission Springs Water District, City of Redlands, and Desert Water Agency. These peer organizations were chosen based on their similar traits to Coachella, such as proximity, environmental conditions, services provided, or size.

Data from peer organizations came from publicly available sources such as adopted budgets, water quality reports, and organization websites. Table 8 below provides organizational information about each benchmark utility including total staffing, services provided, customer accounts, and water and wastewater volume.

Table 8: Peer Organization Information
Utility Governance Services Provided Water
O&M FTEs
Wastewater
O&M FTEs
Water
Customer
Accounts
Wastewater
Customer
Accounts
City of Coachella Municipality Water, Wastewater 7.25 7.25 9,080 7,472 Mission Springs WD Authority Water, Wastewater 10.49 13.51 13,480 9,364 Indio Water Authority Municipality Water 24.00 N/A 24,895 N/A Desert Water Agency Authority Water 34.00 N/A 23,000 N/A City of Redlands Municipality Water, Wastewater 40.00 22.00 22,639 18,000 Coachella Valley WD Authority Water, Wastewater 134.15 133.85 112,180 98,351 It is important to note that the number of FTEs shown for each organization focuses on operations and maintenance staffing levels for water and wastewater operations. These O&M functions include water and wastewater treatment, distribution/collections, facility maintenance, and meter reading. Administrative and support services positions, such as finance, human resources, information technology, and others, were not included in the scope of this benchmarking analysis.

In addition to the services provided, O&M staffing levels, and number of customer accounts, this analysis also compared peer utilities’ operational statistics to Coachella. These statistics include the number of groundwater wells, wastewater treatment plants, average daily potable water production and wastewater influent collected, and miles of pipelines. The following table outlines these statistics for each peer organization.

Table 9: Peer Organization Operational Statistics
Utility Groundwater
Wells
Wastewater
Treatment
Plants
Ave. MGD
Drinking
Water
Treated
Ave. MGD
Wastewater
Collected
Miles of
Water Main
Miles of
Sewer Main
City of Coachella 6 1 6.41 2.93 120 90
Mission Springs WD 13 2 7.14 2.00 237 125
Indio Water Authority 20 N/A 18.00 N/A 347 N/A
City of Redlands 28 1 29.32 4.0 384 247
Desert Water Agency 29 N/A N/A N/A 392 N/A
Coachella Valley WD 95 5 83.50 16.66 2,032 1,162
In general, benchmarking attempts to use a variety of metrics to piece together a picture of how utilities compare.

Given the unique operational circumstances and environments of each utility organization, however, true apples-toapples comparisons are elusive. The most universal of these metrics is the number of customer accounts per FTE

Item 9.
10 CITY OF COACHELLA
utility employee, which are shown in the following two figures that present the water customer accounts per water FTE and sewer customer accounts per sewer FTE.

Figure 2 shows the number of water accounts per FTE. Coachella has 1,252 accounts per water FTE, which is 42% higher than the benchmark organization average. While having more water accounts per water employee compared to peers may indicate high levels of organizational efficiency, this does not appear to be the case in Coachella. A more likely explanation is that the Utilities Department is understaffed relative to its responsibilities. One would expect a smaller utility organization, like Coachella, to have fewer accounts per FTE than their larger peers, which typically benefit from economies of scale.

Figure 2: Water Customer Accounts per Water FTE
Figure 3 shows the number of wastewater accounts per wastewater FTE. Coachella has 1,031 accounts per Sanitary FTE, which is 38% higher than the peer average. Similar to the previous measure, having more wastewater accounts per wastewater employee compared to peers is not necessarily an indication of greater operational efficiency. In the case of Redlands, which operates a much more complex membrane bioreactor wastewater treatment plant that treats effluent to tertiary standards, the comparatively high number of accounts per FTE could indicate a commendable level of efficiency. In the case of Coachella, which treats effluent to secondary standards, a probable explanation for the high number of accounts per FTE is that the Sanitary District is understaffed compared to its peers. 530 566
676
836
1,252 1,285
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
Indio Water
Authority
City of Redlands Desert Water
Agency
Coachella Valley
WD
City of Coachella Mission Springs
WD
Water Accounts per Water FTE
Peer Average (880)

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 11
Figure 3: Sewer Customer Accounts per Sewer FTE
Another metric used to measure staffing levels is MGD of water produced or wastewater collected per FTE. Figure 4 shows that Coachella produces an average of 0.38 MGD per water employee, which is 48% less than the benchmark average. However, this is in line with expectations for a utility the size of Coachella’s, which does not benefit from the same economies of scale that its larger peers do. For instance, Coachella has six active groundwater wells with a total capacity of 16.5 MGD, while most of the benchmark organizations have dozens of wells and substantially higher production to meet the needs of their larger service populations.

Figure 4: MGD Water Produced per Water FTE
693 735
818
1,031
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
Mission Springs WD Coachella Valley WD City of Redlands City of Coachella Wastewater Accounts per Wastewater FTE
Peer Average (749)

0.38 0.62

0.68 0.73

0.88 0.00

0.10 0.20

0.30 0.40

0.50 0.60

0.70 0.80

0.90 1.00
City of Coachella Coachella Valley
WD
Indio Water
Authority
Mission Springs
WD
City of Redlands
Water Produced (MGD) per FTE
Peer Average (0.73)

Item 9.
12 CITY OF COACHELLA
Note that the relative rankings between the peer utilities can change when efficiency is measured on an account or a production basis. The average water used per account, the mix of customers a utility serves, and even how leaky a water distribution system is can greatly influence these relative rankings.

Figure 5 presents the average volume of wastewater (MGD) collected per wastewater FTE. Coachella collects an average of 0.40 MGD of wastewater per Sanitary employee, which is 167% more than its peers.

As not all peers provide wastewater treatment service, including the Indio Water Authority and Desert Water Agency, comparisons can only be made for some peers.

Figure 5: MGD Wastewater Collected per Wastewater FTE
The miles of water main per water FTE is a metric used to compare water system maintenance operations across different organizations. As shown in Figure 6, Coachella has approximately 16.6 miles of water main per Water Authority O&M FTE, which is the second largest among peer organizations and 32% higher than the peer average.

This is likely another indication of Coachella’s relatively lean staffing structure.

0.12 0.15

0.18 0.40

0.00 0.05

0.10 0.15

0.20 0.25

0.30 0.35

0.40 0.45
Coachella Valley WD Mission Springs WD City of Redlands City of Coachella Wastewater Collected (MGD) per FTE
Peer Average (0.15)

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 13
Figure 6: Miles of Water Main per Water FTE
For the wastewater collections system, the miles of sewer main per wastewater FTE shows the relative amount of infrastructure maintained per position across different organizations. On average, there are 10.7 miles of sewer main per FTE across all organizations and Coachella is responsible for 12.4 miles per FTE, which is 16% more than the peer average. Figure 7 shows the miles of sewer main per collections FTE across the benchmark organizations.

Figure 7: Miles of Sewer Main per Wastewater FTE
As mentioned previously, smaller urban utilities tend to have lower outputs than larger organizations, which benefit from operational economies of scale. Nevertheless, Coachella’s ratios of accounts per FTE, wastewater collected per FTE, and miles of pipelines per FTE, are considerably higher than peer averages. Only the number of gallons of water produced per FTE is lower than the average of the other benchmark organizations. Collectively, while at first glance these high ratios may appear favorable, it likely indicates that Coachella’s water and wastewater operations are understaffed.

7.4 9.6 10.1

15.1 16.6

22.6 -

5.0 10.0

15.0 20.0

25.0 Indio Water
Authority
City of
Redlands
Desert Water
Agency
Coachella
Valley WD
City of
Coachella
Mission
Springs WD
Miles of Water Main per Water FTE
Peer Average (12.6)

8.7 9.3

11.2 12.4

0.0 2.0

4.0 6.0

8.0 10.0

12.0 14.0
Coachella Valley WD Mission Springs WD City of Redlands City of Coachella Miles of Sewer Main per Wastewater FTE
Peer Average (10.7)

Item 9.
14 CITY OF COACHELLA
This page intentionally blank to facilitate two-sided printing.

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 15
Analysis and
Recommendations
The analysis and recommendations detailed in this section identify specific and actionable steps the Utilities Department can take to strengthen performance in two key areas: 1) Staffing and Organizational Structure, and 2) Operational Efficiency. While this assessment included reviewing all of the Department’s work units and functions, the proposed recommendations focus upon those areas with the greatest opportunities for improvement.

STAFFING & STRUCTURE
Recommendation 1: Create a Chief Treatment/Distribution Operator position in the Water Authority to increase management capacity.

The current management structure of the Water Authority consists of one Water Superintendent who is responsible for managing six Water operators and handling accounts payable administrative duties. The Water Superintendent should provide highly complex support to the Utilities Manager and should focus on administrative work, such as reports and planning improvements in the Department. In practice, the current Superintendent has limited capacity to do anything other than address urgent operational and maintenance issues. This individual spends considerable time in the field filling in staffing gaps brought about by vacancies and a growing maintenance backlog. This limits their ability to handle administrative obligations and provide strategic management for the Water Authority.

To provide additional management capacity within the Water Authority, a Chief Treatment/Distribution Operator position should be added under the Water Superintendent to supervise the Water Authority’s six operator positions and manage daily operations. This position would be similar to the Chief Treatment/Collections Operator in the Sanitary District’s reporting structure, which has been instrumental in supporting the Sanitary Superintendent.

Mirroring this structure by creating a Chief Treatment/Distribution Operator role in the Water Authority would allow the Superintendent to focus more on administrative needs (like compliance and other reporting) as well as strategic maintenance initiatives that will help the Water Authority become more proactive. It would further position the Water Authority, and the Utilities Department as a whole, to better address anticipated future staffing growth in response to Coachella’s growing population and expanding water and wastewater infrastructure. Employee retention could also be favorably impacted by creating this role, as it would create further promotional opportunities for staff who desire to build careers with the Utilities Department.

Although creating this position requires a financial commitment, it would allow the Water Superintendent to spend more time enhancing the Department’s practices to prolong the useful life of capital infrastructure. Both the Water and Sanitary Superintendents should ideally have capacity to assist the Utilities Manager with budget, CIP, and Department planning and support, which they currently do not have. The benefits of a robust asset management approach, as outlined in Recommendation 6, would likely save the City considerably more money than the costs associated with adding a Chief Treatment/Distribution Operator.

Recommendation 2: Add a full-time Equipment Operator position to support Water and Sanitary maintenance activities.

The Utilities Department currently shares an Equipment Operator position with the City’s Public Works Department, paying 50% of this operator’s salary and benefits costs while Public Works pays the other 50%. Based on this cost allocation, both departments should have equal access to the Equipment Operator for an average of 20 hours per week. Unfortunately, Utility Department staff report that Public Works’ needs are often prioritized over

Item 9.
16 CITY OF COACHELLA
theirs, which means the Utilities Department typically has access to the Equipment Operator less than 50% of the time, sometimes significantly so. This negatively impacts the speed with which Utilities staff can respond to urgent maintenance issues, causing repairs to be delayed or resulting in contractors being brought in to perform excavation work.

As the current infrastructure continues to age, maintenance needs are expected to increase in the coming years. The addition of more infrastructure associated with the arrival of new residents and developments will make access to a dedicated utility Equipment Operator an important component of the City’s current and future maintenance approach. To avoid paying a premium for contractors and better ensure maintenance issues are addressed as quickly as possible, the Utilities Department should add a full-time Equipment Operator position to support Water and Sanitary maintenance activities.

Recommendation 3: Add three full-time treatment and/or distribution operator positions in the Water Authority.

While filling the three current operator vacancies within the Water Authority will greatly improve the current challenges associated with operations, additional positions are needed to transition the Water Authority from a reactive maintenance approach to a proactive one. Adding more positions would also promote near- and long-term financial and operational sustainability by reducing overtime, which currently accounts for a significant portion of the Water Authority’s personnel costs. For instance, even with six approved operator positions, the FY2023 budget still includes $100,000 for operator overtime expenses. This represents a considerable amount of overtime, which stresses the utility financially and can have an impact on employee health, wellness, and safety. Staff report often working on their Fridays off (outside of their 40-hour workweek) and being on-call frequently, which is not sustainable. Although some financially motivated employees may enjoy the extra pay overtime brings, the City must be mindful of overworking employees who already perform physically demanding labor. Additional staff will also help the Water Authority follow required safety practices, including marking underground utilities prior to digging and having an employee perform traffic control duties while field crews do work in or alongside roadways. The lack of staff has also contributed to the inability to ensure adequate preventive maintenance programs, which include such activities as regularly exercising valves to ensure they remain operational, implementing a flushing program at water dead-ends to ensure water quality, and more. Presently, staff are limited primarily to reactive responses to daily work orders, service leaks, and repairs.

To mitigate these risks, three full-time treatment/distribution operator positions should be created. This would bring the Water Authority’s total staffing level to 10.25 FTEs from the current total of 7.25 FTEs. With 10.25 full-time staff, the Water Authority will be able to field separate maintenance crews to perform proactive and reactive maintenance, something which it is not currently able to do. It will also create additional flexibility to input critical condition and maintenance data into GIS and allow for staff to take paid time off, attend training, and reduce the frequency that these operators must be on standby during evenings and weekends. These would all amount to a significant improvement in employees’ quality of life and morale, and potentially result in improved productivity and employee retention. Although salaries, benefits, and equipment costs associated with adding these new positions is significant, the financial and operational benefits the City would experience over time will likely make it a worthwhile investment.

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 17
Recommendation 4: Utilize temporary staff to perform meter reads until the transition to AMI is complete.

The City currently bills water and sewer customers bi-monthly, requiring the Water Authority to read over 9,000 customer meters beginning on the 1st and 15th days of each month. The Department does not have dedicated meter reading staff, meaning the Water Authority’s treatment and distribution operators are pulled away from their normal duties to read meters.

Meters are read using Automated Meter Reading (AMR) systems that allow staff to capture information from each meter via radio waves while driving by customers’ homes, a process which typically takes one day to complete. Unfortunately, there are usually a significant number of errors, whereby the AMR system does not properly transmit the correct value. According to Water Authority staff at the time of this review, there are approximately 700 meter misreads per billing cycle, which is about 8% of the 9,080 accounts. According to the January 2023 Utilities Manager Quarterly Activity Report, there were 5,564 non-reads from April to June 2022, an average of 1,855 per month. These errors are identified in the billing process and reported to Water Authority staff so they can go back out and manually read the meters in question, which is very time consuming.

Figure 8 outlines the meter reading workflow and process for addressing errors.

Given the Utilities Department’s staffing challenges, it is impractical to have licensed treatment and distribution operators reading water meters when they should be monitoring well sites, responding to maintenance emergencies, and performing proactive maintenance.

The City recognizes this issue, as well as the ongoing challenge of meter reading errors, and is in the process of transitioning to Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI). In contrast to AMR systems, AMI systems consist of digital meters that should reduce the number of manual reads each billing cycle and are generally more accurate.

Until AMI is fully implemented, which may take several years, the Department should consider hiring temporary workers for a specific temporary period to perform meter reads so its licensed operators can focus on higher priority needs. By relieving treatment and distribution operators of meter reading duties, the Department will be better equipped to respond to maintenance needs, advance preventative maintenance practices, and monitor water production and quality.

The City could hire temporary staff, train them, and encourage them to hire for the new positions being opened rather than leave for other jurisdictions. The addition of staff in Recommendation 3 above may provide the unlicensed, lower-classification staff capacity to allow for this work to be done in-house. The addition of permanent in-house staff would also help the Department to implement a routine meter exchange program, switching out inoperable or malfunctioning meters with working ones to reduce the number of manual reads that are necessary.

Start of Billing Cycle
One staffer drives by to
read meters
(Two Days)
Read Okay?
All staff given list of
non-reads to
investigate
(Two-three days)
Close to billing to
deadline?
Request volunteers
from Sanitary or other
staff to help investigate
non-reads in time
Give reads to
Customer Service to
generate bills
Complete until the next
billing cycle
NO
YES
YES
NO
Figure 8: Meter Reading Workflow

Item 9.
18 CITY OF COACHELLA
In-house staff could regularly exchange meters year-round rather than the City having to outsource and contract for meter exchange programs at specific times of the year as has been done in 2022 and 2023.

Recommendation 5: Add up to four full-time treatment and/or collections operator positions in the Sanitary District and build a dedicated Sanitary collections crew.

Although the Sanitary District is currently fully staffed, it is also highly reactive and struggling to keep pace with its maintenance calls for service. Daily plant maintenance, including a series of both preventative and corrective activities from de-ragging the headworks facilities pumps to cleaning clarifiers, typically takes priority within the division and consumes significant time and attention. Staff recognize that the City also needs a properly maintained collections system to provide the high levels of service its customers expect, and this is not currently happening. For instance, the City’s 90 miles of collections pipelines have never been completed jetted, as the Sanitary District only has capacity to clean and inspect the hot spots where leaks and breaks occur frequently. Furthermore, there is limited capacity, as well as insufficient camera equipment, to televise sewer lines after they are cleaned to assess their condition and look for roots or other indications of inflow and infiltration (I&I). Deferred pipeline and lift station maintenance can lead to costly failures and decrease the useful lifespan of these assets, which are very expensive to rehabilitate and replace. Unfortunately, the lack of staff limits the amount of time and attention that can be dedicated to collection system maintenance. Even when the focus of crew activity is on collections maintenance, there are still not enough personnel to conduct maintenance efficiently. For instance, although the Sanitary District has two vactor trucks for cleaning sewer pipelines (only one of which was operational at the time of this report), it does not have enough employees to use both trucks at the same time and staff must split their time between plant and collection system work. Staffing constraints also force leadership to defer proactive projects (things like CCTV inspections of sewers, sewer jetting, manhole and pipeline inspection, etc.) to deal with more pressing needs or emergencies, which typically require a full-team response.

To improve the Sanitary District’s ability to provide its desired level of service, up to four full-time treatment and/or collections operator positions should be created. While the Sanitary District’s current five operators and Chief Treatment/Collections Officer are all dual-certified in both treatment and collections, these new positions could be focused on collections-specific roles to begin to build a collections crew. Many utilities employ a dedicated collections maintenance crew, consisting of three full-time positions, to create daily capacity for collections system maintenance because it is natural that the regulatory requirements of plant operations will always take priority over non-regulated but equally important maintenance and prevention work on the collections system. Department and Sanitary District leaders should determine whether dual-certification, which promotes flexible staffing arrangements but is more difficult to hire and train for, or a collections-specific approach to these new positions is best.

Regardless of the Department’s preference regarding dual versus single certification, adding these new positions should greatly improve the Sanitary District’s capacity to perform proactive and reactive maintenance in both the facility and in the collection system. It may also allow the Department to cut back n its use of costly contractors it sometimes relies on to address service line blockages and other maintenance issues. Furthermore, adding new positions would likely improve employee satisfaction and retention by making it easier to take time off and attend training needed to maintain or receive certifications. Given the competitive local labor market, the Department should consider creative hiring strategies if it encounters difficulty attracting promising candidates, such as offering operator-in-training (OIT) opportunities or even hiring temporary staff. While the Department also uses temporary staff to perform certain functions, there have been few instances of converting temps who meet performance expectations to permanent hires. Temporary staff offer a low-risk way to assess an individual’s fit and potential to take on more specialized roles and responsibilities within the organization. In the long-term, these staffing levels should be reassessed as the City’s wastewater infrastructure expands to accommodate new residents and growth, but adding this crew as soon as possible would be a significant addition that should pay immediate dividends to the Sanitary District and its customers.

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 19

OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY
Recommendation 6: Move toward an asset management-based approach to infrastructure management.

More staffing should have an impact on all areas of service delivery, especially if the hiring is combined with the implementation of a series of best practices operational activities. Currently, according to Utilities Department staff, most maintenance activities are reactive, and staff are essentially “fighting fires” every day as issues arise. Other, more routine but necessary maintenance activities are not happening. For example, in the water system, valves are not being regularly exercised; in wastewater, manholes are not being regularly inspected. Utility location associated with construction is not being performed. There are no dedicated staff to maintain and landscape well sites. Simply put, the Department does not have enough capacity to respond to its current maintenance workload, let alone perform proactive maintenance with the goal of extending the useful life and function of its assets.

Utility organizations that only perform reactive maintenance pay dearly when expensive assets fail prematurely and cause service disruptions. There is already evidence of this happening in Coachella. For example, valves in the water distribution network are not regularly exercised to ensure they are able to function, sometimes resulting in maintenance crews failing to quickly isolate leaks because they cannot find a working valve. In one case, crews attempting to isolate a leak had to turn many valves before finally managing to isolate a leak, at which point considerable amounts of water had been lost and the length of the outage to customers was far greater than anticipated. Coachella’s location in a desert environment that is often subject to long droughts makes the loss of any treated water significant, and every effort to reduce the impacts of breaks should be considered and implemented when possible.

To capitalize on more staffing capacity, the Department should move toward employing a robust Asset Management (AM) approach, which encompasses planning, design, operations, maintenance, and renewal activities, throughout the lifecycle of its assets. Success in this effort will depend on how maintenance activities and asset conditions are tracked, as well as how this data is used to establish maintenance priorities, and, ultimately, make decisions on how assets will be managed. As it looks forward, Coachella should consider a number of initiatives with regard to making this happen, including:
• Risk-Based Management – Risk, as defined by the International Standards Organization in statement 31000, is “the effect of uncertainty on objectives.” Utilizing this definition as a guide, a risk-based management approach requires the Department to both articulate what it wants to do (its objectives) and identify, to the greatest extent possible, what circumstances may impede its achievement of those objectives. From there a “treatment” or approach to mitigating risk can be formulated and measured for effectiveness. In running any organization as complex and multi-faceted as a public utility, there will inevitably be a host of corresponding, sometimes competing, objectives that compete for resources and attention. This makes the codification of objectives, once agreed to, very important so that their impact relative to the risk the organization incurs is properly considered. Their listing also gives direction to those involved with assuring their compliance a reference point to judge their approach to work. In Coachella, infrastructure risk assessment is often performed informally, based on staff experience, and standards may vary across the utility. This is not unusual in utilities, but it can cause confusion amongst staff, decision-makers, and customers. A wellarticulated series of objectives based on an agreed to service level and with a consideration of risk is necessary for impactful decision-making that sets the utility up for success. This can be done at the strategic, Department-wide level, to the individual asset or system level. As new staff is hired, the Department will be best served if they can be educated on what the Department’s purpose is and what might impact the achievement of that purpose. A risk-based management approach can help achieve that.

Item 9.
20 CITY OF COACHELLA
• Use Sedaru® as an Asset Management and Planning Tool – One way to address risk is to have good, consistent, highly reliable data, from which operational and planning decisions can be made. Like a lot of utilities, Coachella is already in process of tracking asset condition and their corresponding risk level, where risk is the combination of the likelihood of an asset failing (represented by condition) and consequence of failure. While the Utilities Department has some of its infrastructure assets in GIS and its asset management system, Sedaru, key information about these assets, including maintenance history, installation date, age, size, location, etc., is inconsistently recorded and still in process due to staff capacity constraints. To use Sedaru to its full potential, all maintenance activities and asset information should be catalogued consistently. This information should then be used to guide maintenance and capital planning. The Department can then use Sedaru to make informed decisions on how and when to operate, maintain, and replace its assets.
• Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Practices – As the organization matures toward more mature Asset Management practice, the adoption of reliability-centered maintenance activities should be a goal.

RCM advances past preventative maintenance and reactive maintenance to predictive maintenance practices that rely on condition, criticality, and past maintenance data to develop individual maintenance plans for all major assets. Adopting RCM will reduce unnecessary PM and help to mitigate the amount of unplanned maintenance.

Prioritizing an AM approach may lead to significant operational and cultural changes in the organization, from how supervisors and shift leaders assign work, to tasking certain employees with performing preventative and predictive maintenance while others focus on reactive maintenance, to reconceptualizing equipment needs to more robust training, etc. It should be noted that integrating AM principles into the Department’s current operating approach is a significant undertaking and the benefits could take years to fully realize. However, there is no viable alternative if the organization is to sustainably operate; failure to properly maintain utility assets will inevitably lead to more service disruptions and costly repairs. Making Asset Management a high priority moving forward will ensure Coachella’s significant investments in its community and environment are protected and their benefits are sustained well into the future.

Recommendation 7: Implement a rolling replacement budgeting cycle for equipment to perform preventative maintenance.

In addition to creating new Water and Sanitary positions to enhance the Department’s maintenance efforts, additional equipment and resources are needed to maximize operational efficiency and effectiveness. For example, although Sanitary staff clean sewer lines using a jet truck, they do not have a CCTV camera to televise sewer pipelines following cleaning. Inspecting those segments is a best practice that can identify problems before they become critical and could impact service delivery. To this end, a camera and, preferably, a CCTV van with monitors and other necessary equipment, is needed. This will allow staff to properly navigate and view the pipeline conditions in real time. Ideally, a program will be designed to ensure the van will follow closely behind the jet truck to televise lines just after they are cleaned, when problem areas are most visible. Similarly, staff open manhole covers by hand, which is physically demanding and carries a high risk of injury. Consideration should be given to purchasing mechanical liftgates and other tools to minimize the effort required to open manholes, saving employees’ energy, promoting safety, and potentially increasing productivity.

In some cases, the Department has the correct resources, but they are old or dysfunctional and need to be replaced.

Water Authority staff shared that their concrete saw, used to cut through concrete and asphalt streets and sidewalks to reach buried pipelines, is very old and often takes up to one hour to start. This is problematic as the saw is required for most pipeline repairs, costing staff precious time when addressing maintenance emergencies. The Utilities Department should carefully assess its needs for new and upgraded equipment as a part of the annual budgeting and

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 21
long-term capital planning efforts. At a time when the Utilities Department is limited by staffing constraints, having the right equipment will help the City get the most out of Water and Sanitary employees. The exploration of new, more efficient technologies is also encouraged.

Recommendation 8: Conduct a focused compensation study of neighboring utilities including municipal and special utility districts.

According to several staff, the Utilities Department has lost many employees to neighboring utility organizations in recent years, and Coachella’s comparatively low wages are noted as the driving force behind the City’s struggles to retain qualified staff, along with high levels of overtime and frequent on-call shifts. This turnover has only made circumstances more challenging for the employees who remain, resulting in increasing amounts of overtime to compensate for vacancies, an inability or unwillingness to take paid leave, and other scheduling challenges.

While a salary and compensation survey was not within the scope of this review, in order to test this theory Raftelis benchmarked a few utility positions against salary schedules in other utilities in the region using publicly available information.

Table 10 below shows the salary range comparison for four positions: Water Service Worker I, Water Service Worker II, (Wastewater) Treatment Plant Operator I, and (Wastewater) Treatment Plant Operator III. This comparison shows that, for all four positions and despite a recent 7% salary range increase for Coachella staff in July, the City of Coachella range is below that in peer utilities as peers have continued to increase their ranges as well.

Item 9.
22 CITY OF COACHELLA
Table 10: Benchmark Salary Comparison

AGENCY POSITION TITLE MINIMUM MIDPOINT MAXIMUM
Coachella Water Service Worker I $51,322 $58,412 $65,501 Hi-Desert WD Water Quality Technician I $64,391 $76,666 $88,940 Redlands Water Distribution Operator $52,538 $59,796 $67,054 Valley Sanitary District N/A
Mission Springs WD Water Production Operator I $62,962 $71,812 $80,662 Indio Water Utility Worker I $41,099 $50,910 $60,721
Peer Average $55,247 $64,796 $74,344
Above/Below -7.11% -9.85% -11.90%
Coachella Water Service Worker II $58,002 $66,015 $74,027 Hi-Desert WD Water Quality Technician II $73,820 $87,891 $101,963 Redlands Water Treatment Operator II $62,719 $71,406 $80,092 Valley Sanitary District N/A
Mission Springs WD Water Production Operator II $69,534 $79,279 $89,024 Indio Water Utility Worker II $45,410 $56,251 $67,091
Peer Average $62,871 $73,707 $84,543
Above/Below -7.74% -10.44% -12.44%
Coachella Treatment Plant Operator I $58,002 $66,015 $74,027 Hi-Desert WD Wastewater Treatment Plant
Operator I $64,391 $76,666 $88,940
Redlands Wastewater Facilities Operator I $57,346 $65,289 $73,232 Valley Sanitary District Wastewater Operator I $57,720 $67,535 $77,350 Mission Springs WD Wastewater Treatment Plant
Operator I $66,165 $75,452 $84,739
Indio N/A
Peer Average $61,406 $71,235 $81,065
Above/Below -5.54% -7.33% -8.68%
Coachella Treatment Plant Operator III $72,445 $82,453 $92,460 Hi-Desert WD Wastewater Treatment Plant
Operator III $84,629 $100,761 $116,893
Redlands Wastewater Facilities Operator III $67,915 $77,322 $86,728 Valley Sanitary District Wastewater Operator III $70,174 $82,095 $94,016 Mission Springs WD N/A
Indio N/A
Peer Average $74,239 $86,726 $99,212
Above/Below -2.42% -4.93% -6.81%
Although many public utilities across the country are struggling to attract and retain staff, municipal utilities in California face unique competition from the state’s many special utility districts, which tend to offer better pay.

Coachella neighbors several municipal utilities and special districts, including most of the regional peers cited in the benchmarking section of this report, contributing to a highly competitive local labor market.

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 23
Given the difficulties of attracting skilled and licensed utility professionals, Coachella must do everything it can to make the Utilities Department an attractive place to work. Retaining existing staff is also of the utmost importance, as their institutional knowledge of the Department’s unique facilities and infrastructure takes years to develop and cannot be easily replaced. While the City should consider recruitment and retention holistically, from compensation to employee development and workplace culture, ensuring salaries and wages are aligned with market rates should be a high priority. The Department has plans to seek consultant support to conduct a compensation study of neighboring utilities, which is an excellent way to determine where Coachella’s salaries may be out of line with the local market. This study should include a representative sample of both municipal utilities and special utility districts to provide a comprehensive picture of Coachella’s competitive labor landscape. The study’s results will guide the City in ensuring its salaries and benefits are sufficient to attract and retain the skilled staff needed to operate its utilities.

Recommendation 9: Upgrade and expand the SCADA network that allows staff to remotely monitor the water and wastewater systems.

The Utilities Department utilizes supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) technologies to monitor the various aspects of its water and wastewater plants and systems. SCADA systems are critical for effective utility operations as they help maintain system efficiency and communicate issues in real time, allowing staff to intervene quickly when issues arise. However, Coachella’s SCADA network is outdated and is not extensively installed throughout the water and wastewater systems. For example, wastewater treatment plant operators who are on-call during the overnight and weekend hours are notified at home when an alarm is triggered in the plant, but cannot remotely access the SCADA network to determine the cause and severity of the issue. This requires the on-call operator to go to the plant and assess the situation, which may not be urgent or could even be a false alarm. Similarly, because SCADA instruments are not installed at all operational facilities, including some wastewater lift stations, operators cannot remotely monitor their performance.

To preserve staff capacity and support accurate, real-time monitoring of the water and wastewater systems, the Department should invest in SCADA upgrades that improve remote access capabilities, and possibly remote control for certain purposes. Upgraded SCADA instruments should also be fully deployed throughout the water and wastewater infrastructure systems to provide operators with comprehensive information so they can take corrective actions, when needed. Upgrading and expanding the Department’s SCADA networks for the Water Authority and Sanitary District will create new maintenance needs, which the recommended SCADA/Instrumentation Technician would be able to address (Recommendation 10). While the Department could incur several hundreds of thousands of dollars upgrading and expanding the use of SCADA technologies, doing so is an industry best practice that would increase operational efficiency and minimize risks.

Recommendation 10: Add one full-time SCADA/Instrumentation Technician position to program and maintain the Department’s SCADA communications network.

The Utilities Department currently does not have dedicated staff for programming and maintaining SCADA instruments throughout these plants and systems. Many utility organizations, including several of the peer utilities referenced in the benchmarking section of this study, have dedicated technicians responsible for installing, calibrating, and maintaining SCADA instruments. Coachella primarily relies on contractors to perform these duties, and occasionally has one Sanitary District employee, who was formerly an electrician, conduct minor SCADA maintenance. Having in-house staff available to manage this SCADA network and ensure it is properly integrated with Departmental technologies is a best practice which the City should consider moving forward.

Given the size of the Utilities Department’s water and wastewater systems, one full-time SCADA/Instrumentation Technician should be capable of maintaining both the Water and Sanitary SCADA networks. Other duties could also include general facility maintenance during periods when the need for SCADA maintenance is slow; however

Item 9.
24 CITY OF COACHELLA
this Technician’s workload will likely increase if the Department updates and expands its SCADA networks, as advised in Recommendation 9. The ideal candidate for this role will need to be knowledgeable of water and wastewater operational technologies, as well as, ideally, a proficient commercial electrician. The Department should determine whether candidates will be required to hold a Journeyman’s electrician license based on local requirements. Ultimately, having this dedicated SCADA resource will ensure the Department’s Water and Sanitary operators are receiving accurate data in real time, improving their ability to isolate leaks, control flows, and more.

Recommendation 11: Conduct a critical spares exercise to identify critical spare parts and components needed for operational equipment in both water and wastewater and then contract with a parts supplier to order and deliver commonly needed parts and components for water and sanitary assets.

The Utilities Department does not maintain a robust inventory of spare parts and components for asset repairs and replacements, instead buying most parts and materials as they are needed. While the Department previously contracted with a supplier for parts purchase and delivery, this practice was discontinued several years ago. Instead, staff currently track inventory and purchase parts at local hardware stores, including Lowe’s and Home Depot. With the Department stretched thin due to staffing constraints, spending valuable time driving to pick up parts is not the best use of the Department’s licensed operators. Furthermore, larger parts and orders often require multiple trips in the Department’s light duty vehicles and pickup trucks, costing further time that could be spent at the plant or in the field. This inefficient use of time could also lead to negative consequences if the required parts are not on hand for a maintenance emergency, and the maintenance crews must leave the site to find it in a local store.

Performing a critical spares exercise to identify and inventory critical spare parts and components will assure that the Department is aware and can adequately stock those items that are needed to effectively run the Utility. If possible, the Department should also once again contract with a parts supplier to streamline the ordering and delivery process so staff can focus their energy on urgent maintenance and operational needs. Most parts suppliers will deliver orders directly to one of the Department’s facilities, allowing for convenient access without the need to drive offsite to collect the materials. Scheduled orders may also be possible, whereby the most used parts can be purchased and delivered automatically on a regular basis (e.g., quarterly) to streamline the procurement process. It is also worth considering purchasing the most used parts in bulk, both to maintain a sufficient inventory and also to benefit from wholesale pricing, if available. Contracting with a parts provider is a simple way to increase staff capacity and ensure the right parts and resources are on hand when needed.

Item 9.

UTILITY OPERATIONS STAFFING STUDY 25
Conclusion
This organizational assessment was undertaken to identify opportunities to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the Water Utilities Department’s staff and operations. The Department is fortunate to have skilled and dedicated employees who provide high quality services to the Coachella community, improving public health and quality of life for residents, businesses, and visitors. The recommendations outlined in this report are intended to build upon the Department’s strengths and prepare it to meet present and future challenges.

Presently, both the Water Authority and Sanitary District are highly reactive in their approach to infrastructure maintenance, and this is largely due to their lean staffing numbers. As a result, water and wastewater assets, from motors to pumps to pipelines, are not proactively maintained to prevent defects and ensure optimal performance, leading to untimely asset failures that negatively impact customers. This study identified several opportunities to enhance the Department’s O&M staffing levels and improve maintenance practices to help the Department implement an asset management approach centered around preventative and predictive maintenance and improve operations and service levels now and in the future. As such, we recommend the addition of several O&M positions in the Water Authority and Sanitary District. Table 11 below summarizes these recommended positions.

Table 11: Summary of Recommended Positions
Position Division Number
of FTEs
Estimated Cost Impact
(Midpoint + 30%
Benefits)
Chief Treatment/ Distribution Officer Water Authority 1 $140,930 Equipment Operator
Water Authority &
Sanitary District
(50/50 cost allocation)
1 $92,022
Wastewater Treatment/ Distribution
Operator I Water Authority 3 $257,456
Water Treatment/ Collections Operator I Sanitary District 4 $303,740 SCADA/ Instrumentation Technician
Water Authority &
Sanitary District
(50/50 cost allocation)
1 $100,304
TOTAL 10 $894,452
The City is urged to add these positions as soon as possible to begin reaping the maintenance benefits and alleviate current pressures on existing personnel. The planned salary study of the Utilities Department should aid recruitment efforts for these positions, as it will help the City determine if it has competitive compensation offerings. Some of the recommended changes can be implemented immediately as they represent formalization of existing relationships or the need for heightened focus on specific services or functions. Other changes will require time and careful phasing to ensure staff and services are cared for in the process. For all changes, the organization will need to communicate clearly why they are being implemented and what impacts, if any, the changes will have on employees.

Using this report as a guide, the Department will be able to continue to improve operations and services and to streamline its operations for the benefit of Coachella’s residents, businesses, and visitors. Prioritization of these recommendations and thoughtful, planned implementation should ensure resources are expended prudently and any risks to utility operations are reduced.

Item 9.

WHEREAS, a Hurricane Hilary made landfall as a tropical storm on Sunday, August 20, 2023 and an additional monsoonal storm entered on Friday, September 1; and WHEREAS, both storms resulted in heavy rainfall that brought 3 to 4 inches of rain impacting the City of Coachella resulting in significant damage and flash flooding that impacted City infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, City staff responded in deploying preventative flood measures throughout the City before the storm; and
WHEREAS, City staff responded on the cleanup and recovery of both storms at a timely manner.

NOW THEREFORE, I, Steven A. Hernandez, Mayor of the City of Coachella, by the power vested in me, do hereby recognize
Gabriel Martin, Maritza Martinez, Maricarmen Aguirre, Janeth Lara, Cesar Talamantes, Joann Lopez, Vincent Orfano, Jason Stevens, Risseth Lora, Rene Rosales, Sara Montano, Pete Hernandez, Joel Zendejas, Ramon Gutierrez, Ricardo Rabago, Heri Osuna, Aaron Gasu, Mario Sanchez, Jose Montoya, Horacio Murillo, Ray Gamboa, Albert Brisuano, Alberto Gutierrez, Alex Alarcon, Hector Morin, Jose Nunez, Tony Delara, Castulo Estrada, Jesus Chabolla, Gustavo Gallegos, Robert Huerta, Domingo Felix, Cesar Zendejas, Jose Duran, Erfrain Rodriguez, Pedro Sustaita, Edgar Beltran, Jose Rosette, Jesse Bribiesca, Jose Meza, Angel Coronel, Robert Aguilar, Julio Hermosillo, Miguel Felix , Justin Karp and urge all citizens of the City of Coachella to recognize staff for their service and dedication to the safety of our residents.

IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have hereunto set my
hand and caused the official seal of the City of
Coachella, California to be affixed this 13th day of
September 2023.
___________________________________
Steven A. Hernandez, Mayor
City of Coachella, California

Item 10.

Proclamations Names

1. Gabriel Martin

2. Maritza Martinez

3. Maricarmen Aguirre

4. Janeth Lara

5. Cesar Talamantes

6. Joann Lopez

7. Vincent Orfano

8. Jason Stevens

9. Risseth Lora

10.Rene Rosales

11.Sara Montano

12.Pete Hernandez

13.Joel Zendejas

14.Ramon Gutierrez

15.Ricardo Rabago

16.Heri Osuna

17.Aaron Gasu

18.Mario Sanchez

19.Jose Montoya

20.Horacio Murillo

21.Ray Gamboa

22.Albert Brisuano

23.Alberto Gutierrez

24.Alex Alarcon

25.Hector Morin

26.Jose Nunez

27.Tony Delara

28.Castulo Estrada

29.Jesus Chabolla

30.Gustavo Gallegos

31.Robert Huerta

32.Domingo Felix

33.Cesar Zendejas

34.Jose Duran

35.Erfrain Rodriguez

Item 10.

36.Pedro Sustaita

37.Edgar Beltran

38.Jose Rosette

39.Jesse Bribiesca

40.Jose Meza

41.Angel Coronel

42.Robert Aguilar

43.Julio Hermosillo

44.Miguel Felix

45.Justin Karp

Item 10.

City Hall Council Chamber
1515 Sixth Street, Coachella, California
(760) 398-3502  www.coachella.org

MINUTES

OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE

CITY OF COACHELLA

CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETING

THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE COACHELLA SANITARY DISTRICT,

COACHELLA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COACHELLA FINANCING AUTHORITY,

COACHELLA EDUCATIONAL AND GOVERNMENTAL ACCESS CABLE CHANNEL CORPORATION,

COACHELLA WATER AUTHORITY, AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COACHELLA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY July 26, 2023
5:00PM – CLOSED SESSION
6:00 PM – REGULAR MEETING
In-Person Meeting
Location:

Coachella City Hall
Council Chamber
1515 Sixth Street
Coachella, CA
If you would like to attend the meeting via Zoom, here is the link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88457271898?pwd=REdzU1NoQmpVSFhWTDVaZ0VCekYxdz09 Or One tap mobile : 16699006833,,88457271898#,,,,*606140# Or Telephone:

US: +1 669 900 6833
Webinar ID: 884 5727 1898
Passcode: 606140
Spanish: El idioma español está disponible en Zoom seleccionado la opción en la parte de abajo de la pantalla
 Public comments may be received either in person, via email, telephonically, or via Zoom with a limit of 250 words, or three minutes:
o In Real Time:

If participating in real time via Zoom or phone, during the Public Comment Period, use the “raise hand” function on your computer, or when using a phone, participants can raise their hand by pressing *9 on the keypad.
o In Writing:

Written comments may be submitted to the City Council electronically via email to [email protected]. Transmittal prior to the start of the meeting is required. All written comments received will be forwarded to the City Council and entered into the record. o If you wish, you may leave a message at (760) 262-6240 before 5:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting.  The live stream of the meeting may be viewed online by accessing the city's website at www.coachella.org, and clicking on the "Watch Council Meetings" tab located on the home page, and then clicking on the "live" button.

Item 11.

Minutes City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting July 26, 2023

CALL TO ORDER:

The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Coachella was called to order at 5:01 P.M.

ROLL CALL:

PRESENT: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen (arrived at 5:08 pm) Councilmember Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez
City Clerk Zepeda
ABSENT: City Treasurer Aviles
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

City Manager Martin asked Council to continue Item #2 from closed session to the next council meeting to review the new information received. Mayor Pro Tem Galarza requested to table Item #26 due to the ambiguity and staff will work on acquiring the information being requested.

Motion: To approve continuance of Item #2 and table Item #26 Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Mayor Hernandez
Approved: 2-2, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: Councilmember Delgado, and Councilmember Dr. Figueroa ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Virgen
The motion failed. The item will come back when they have a full council.

PUBLIC COMMENTS (CLOSED SESSION ITEMS):

None
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION:

1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957(b)(1)
1) Title: City Manager
2) Title: City Attorney

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant Exposure to Litigation, Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)/(e)(1)

Item 11.

Minutes City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting July 26, 2023

One (1) Potential Case
Councilmember Virgen arrived at 5:10 pm during closed session.

The Council went back to the Approval of the Agenda item once there was a full council The City Manager suggested taking out item 2 from the closed session calendar and Mayor Pro Tem Galarza requested tabling item 26. There was a roll call that did not pass.

Motion: To approve the agenda with continuance of Item #2 and table Item #26 Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Mayor Hernandez
Approved: 3-2, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza, and Councilmember Virgen NOES: Councilmember Delgado, and Councilmember Dr. Figueroa ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
RECONVENE REGULAR MEETING:

The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Coachella was reconvened at 6:04 P.M.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

City Manager Dr. Martin led the Pledge of Allegiance.

CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS:

City Attorney Campos stated that Council met in Closed Session to discuss item 1 only, and direction was given, but no reportable action was taken.

PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS:

3. Presentation by Kounkuey Design Initiative on the City of Coachella Displacement Avoidance Plan WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:

City Clerk Zepeda stated that “We received two letters were received from Lift To Rise via email, July 25th, 2023, in support of items #27 and #28.”
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(It is recommended that Consent Items be acted upon simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by a Council Member or member of the audience.)\ Mayor Hernandez asked to pull item #8 and item #15 for discussion, approved with consent calendar.

Item 11.

Minutes City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting July 26, 2023

(Mayor Pro Tem Galarza stepped away at 6:33pm and returned at 6:34pm)

4. Regular Meeting Minutes of June 28, 2023, of the City of Coachella, Coachella Sanitary District, Coachella Fire Protection District, Coachella Financing Authority, Coachella Educational and Governmental Access Cable Corporation, Coachella Water Authority, and Successor Agency to the Coachella Redevelopment Agency.

5. Voucher Listing- EFT's/Utility Billing Refunds/FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24 Expenditures as of July 26, 2023 for $6,516,659.46

6. Department Quarterly Reports - 4th Quarter

7. Authorize Execution of Master Lease Equity Agreement with Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. for the Purchase of a 2024 Ford F550 in the amount of $155,847

8. Authorize Award of Central Park Architectural and Engineering Design Services Project No. P-31 in the amount of $838,888.00 to Albert A. Webb Associates

9. Reject IRC Backflow’s bid as “Non-Responsive”, and Approve Awarding a Contract for the Replacement of 600 Domestic Consumption Meters to the Van Dyke Corporation in the amount of $80,400.00 plus 10% contingency

10. Authorize Awarding a Stipend to City of Coachella Resident Engagement Academy Participants in the Amount of $250 to Each Participant for a Total of $6,250

11. Resolution No. 2023-58 approving a Part Time Public Works Parks Maintenance Worker, in the Parks Division, and Defunding a Part Time Parks Ranger position in the Parks and Recreation Division

12. Approve Updated Cooperative Agreement for El Grito Event between: the City of Coachella, Telemundo and Mexican Consulate in San Bernardino and Approve Operation of a Beer Garden at Rancho Las Flores Park for the 2023 El Grito Event

13. Award Construction Agreement to Superb Engineering for Las Luna & Calle Bouganvilia Retention Basin Landscape Improvements City Project No. LL-01 & LL-05 for $177,039

14. Authorize Award of a Professional Services Agreement to Rhythm Tech Productions LLC in the amount of $32,799.81 for the 2023 El Grito event

15. Authorize Execution of Rideshare Services Agreement with Latino Equity Advocacy Policy Institute and Authorize the City Manager to sign the Master Lease Equity Agreement with Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. for the purchase of seventeen (17) Model Y Teslas in the amount of $1,029,010

16. Coachella Valley 1 Apartments– Subordination Agreement Motion: To approve consent calendar.

Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

Item 11.

Minutes City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting July 26, 2023

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
NEW BUSINESS CALENDAR (LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE):

17. Designation of Voting Delegate and Alternates to the League of California Cities Annual Conference & Expo
Motion: To nominate Councilmembers Virgen and Dr. Figueroa as voting delates for League of Cities Conference.

Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Councilmember Delgado
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

18. Resolution No. 2023-30 Approving the Ratification of a Four Year Memorandum of Understanding Agreement between the City of Coachella and Teamsters Local 1932, representing the Confidential MidManagement Employees Bargaining Unit Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

19. Appointments to the Cultural and Arts Commission
The Council made the following nominations:

1. Armando Lerma by Mayor Hernandez

2. Clara Nieblas by Councilmember Virgen

3. Irene N. Rodrigues by Councilmember Delgado

4. Juan Ponce Ramos by Councilmember Dr. Figueroa

Item 11.

Minutes City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting July 26, 2023

5. Oralia “Yaya” Ortiz by Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Alternate: Javier Figueroa
Motion: To approve appointments to the Cultural and Arts Commission.

Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

20. Making Findings on an Energy Services Contract and Facility Financing for an Energy Efficiency Project Required Under California Government Code Section 4217.10 et. seq. and Authorizing an Energy Services Contract
Councilmember Dr. Figueroa stepped away at 7:11 pm and returned at 7:12 pm.

Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa
Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

21. Execution of the Eleventh Amended Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Coachella and Sports Leagues.
(Mayor Hernandez stepped away at 7:31pm and returned at 7:31pm. Mayor Pro Tem Galarza stepped away at 7:31pm and returned at 7:32pm. )
Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Mayor Hernandez
Seconded by: Councilmember Virgen
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza

Item 11.

Minutes City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting July 26, 2023

NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

22. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-55 Authorizing the City Manager to Apply for, Accept and Execute all Related Documents for Grant Funds in an Amount of Twenty-Nine Million Five Hundred Thousand ($29,500,000) Dollars from the State’s Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) program, administered by the Strategic Growth Council (SGC) and the Department of Conservation for Projects Within the Coachella Prospera Proposed Project area Authorizing the Execution of a Public Safety CFD Deferral Agreement, Partnership Agreement and all Other Required Documents
Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

23. Authorize the Use and Purchase Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Technology (Karina Quintanilla spoke in favor for this item.)
Motion: To oppose the item and not bring this item back.

Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Mayor Hernandez
Approved: 3-2, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Virgen, Mayor pro Tem Galarza, Mayor Hernandez NOES: Councilmember Delgado, and Councilmember Dr. Figueroa ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

24. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-57 Authorizing the City of Coachella’s Participation in the County of Riverside’s Urban County Program for Fiscal Years 2024-25, 2025-2026, and 2026-2027 (Councilmember Dr. Figueroa stepped away at 9:14pm and returned at 9:16pm.) Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Mayor Hernandez
Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza

Item 11.

Minutes City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting July 26, 2023

Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

25. Authorize the Awarded Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Grant Funds that were Originally Intended to be Reimbursed to the City for the Land Acquisition Costs of the Transit Hub Site to be Used for the Construction of the Transit Hub; and Appropriate $497,556 from General Fund Reserves to Fund the Shortfall for the Transit Hub Project Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Mayor Hernandez
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

26. Discussion Regarding City Council Meeting Schedule
Tabled
PUBLIC HEARING CALENDAR (QUASI-JUDICIAL):

27. Introduce Ordinance No. 1206 City of Coachella Objective Design Standards for Multi-family Residential and Mixed-use Development - Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 22-04 is a Proposal to Amend Coachella Municipal Code Title 17, Zoning, Adopting Objective Design Standards for Multi-family Residential Development to apply to G-N General Neighborhood, U-N Urban Neighborhood, DT-PV Downtown Pueblo Viejo, DT-PV Transition, U-E Urban Employment and Neighborhood Commercial zones (First Reading)
(Mayor Hernandez recused himself from item #27)
(Councilmember Dr. Figueroa stepped away at 9:26pm and returned at 9:27pm) (Mayor Pro Tem Galarza stepped away at 9:27pm and returned at 9:28pm) Open To Public Comment 9:54 P.M and Closed 9:57 P.M.

No Public Comments.

Item 11.

Minutes City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting July 26, 2023

Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa
Seconded by: Councilmember Virgen
Approved: 4-1, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Mayor Hernandez
ABSENT: None

28. City of Coachella Zoning Consistency Update General Plan Amendment No. 23-02, Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 22-03, and Change of Zone No. 23-01 a proposed update of the Official Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance for Consistency with the Coachella General Plan and Amendments to the General Plan 2035 and Official General Plan Map (City-Initiated)
(Mayor Hernandez recused himself from item #28)
Open To Public Comment 9:59 P.M and Closed 10:00 P.M.

No Public Comments.

Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa
Seconded by: Councilmember Virgen
Approved: 4-1, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Mayor Hernandez
ABSENT: None

29. General Plan Amendment No. 23-03 and Environmental Assessment No. 23-03 “General Plan Addendum Project” Establishment of General Plan Land use Designations for Three Areas That Were Evaluated as Part of the City of Coachella General Plan Planning Area in the Certified 2015 Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) but for Which no General Plan land use Designation was Identified. Areas Include:
(1) Generally Bounded by Dillon Road to the west, Fargo Canyon to the North, Parcel Boundaries to the east, and East Side Dike to the Southeast (Northern Project Area); (2) Generally bounded by Jackson Street on the west, approximately 0.25 mile north of 51st Avenue on the north, Calhoun Street on the east, and 52nd Avenue on the south (Western Project Area); and (3) Generally bounded by State Route 86 (SR-86) to the west, Avenue 60 to the north, Lincoln Street to the east, and 62nd Avenue to the south (Southern Project Area) (Applicant: City-Initiated)
(Councilmember Delgado recused herself from this item.)

Item 11.

Minutes City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting July 26, 2023

Open To Public Comment 10:09P.M and Closed 10:09 P.M.

No Public Comments.

Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa
Seconded by: Mayor Hernandez
Approved: 4-1, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Councilmember Delgado
ABSENT: None

30. Public Hearing for Resolution No. 2023-52 Confirming the Assessment and Diagram and Ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments for the City of Coachella Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 through 40 for Fiscal Year 2032/2024
Open To Public Comment 10:14P.M and Closed 10:15 P.M.

No Public Comments.

Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Councilmember Virgen
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

31. Adopt Resolution No. SD-2023-04 Authorizing the Collection of Residential Sanitary Sewer Rates for Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Through the County of Riverside Tax Roll Open To Public Comment 10:16 P.M and Closed 10:16 P.M.

No Public Comments.

Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Councilmember Figueroa
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

Item 11.

Minutes City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting July 26, 2023

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

32. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-48 Authorizing the Establishment of an Annual Special tax for City of Coachella Community Facilities District No. 2005-01 (Law Enforcement, Fire and Paramedic Services) and Annexation Areas Thereto for Fiscal Year 2023/2024
Open To Public Comment 10:17 P.M and Closed 10:17 P.M.

No Public Comments.

Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Councilmember Virgen
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

33. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-51 Approving a 36-Month Renewal of Entertainment Permit No. 22-02 for the Rancho Escondido Event Venue, an Outdoor Entertainment Venue Located on an 8.6-acre Site at 85321 Avenue 44 (APN# 696-520-014). Applicant: Leonel Lopez and Margarita Lopez Open To Public Comment 10:21 P.M and Closed 10:33 P.M.

Bill Collins opposed this item.

Debra Schuster opposed this item.

Thomas Aguilar opposed this item.

Margarita Lopez supported this item.

Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Councilmember Delgado
Seconded by: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza

Item 11.

Minutes City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting July 26, 2023

NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS (NON-AGENDA ITEMS):

The public may address the City Council/Board/Corporation/ Authority on any item of interest to the public that is not on the agenda but is in the subject matter jurisdiction thereof. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes.

None.

REPORTS AND REQUESTS:

Council Comments/Report of Miscellaneous Committees.

Councilmember Dr. Figueroa - Attended the Coachella Prospera, shout out to Celina Jimenez, staff and all the partners. He attended the small businesses event and it was very informative.

Councilmember Virgen- Attended the Coachella Prospera and congratulated Celina Jimenez as well. She spoke about her experiences and encounters in the NALEO conference. She attended the Strategic Growth with the City and staff and the Council attended. She was invited to Assembly member Eduardo Garcia’s office yesterday and she spoke to some of their interns. She said they reminded her of the City’s interns. She requested an update on Youth Advisory Commission and an update on interns; more specifically, who they work with, what they are working on, and a small report.

Councilmember Delgado – She gave an update on SCAG approved $11,888,000 to RCTC. The Airport Commission is allowing sponsorships advertisement opportunities. They have a new CEO that starts in September. She attended the small celebration for a senior (Prospero Montes Perez) and stated her parents knew who he was. She was disappointed that they were unable to talk about the City Council meetings this evening because it is important that they are not canceling meetings and continue having meeting at the set dates or rescheduling the meetings. She spoke on the importance of public safety conversations for the City.

Councilmember Galarza – He attended the Coachella Prospera event and the National Association of Latino Elected Official Conference as a first timer. It was very informative and he got to meet other elected officials.

The conference was very educational. He requested that staff shorten item presentations.

Mayor Hernandez- He made some contact with the Bureau of Reclamation with the water department to get a $1.5 million grant for the replacement of meters. His requests are that this Council to take seriously the Heat Action Plan that it is more than just planting trees or shade equity. He recommended that staff look into this new economy and the transition from carbon based machines to electric, Look into a workforce plan, focus on arts and music and provide a good avenue for employment as they have plenty of good talent, for the Public Works Director and City Engineer start the road work plan, a profile on the interns of the City; videos on the interns. He also recommended that the Public Works Department replace the sand in the volleyball courts with beach sand. The entry point monuments could be better

Item 11.

Minutes City Council Closed Session and Regular Meeting July 26, 2023

City Manager’s Comments.

The City Manager invited the Council to the Bagdouma Basketball Courts Ribbon Cutting and thanked staff participation.

ADJOURNMENT:

There being no further business to come before the City Council and the Agencies, Mayor Hernandez adjourned the meeting at 11:11 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
_____________________
Angela Zepeda
City Clerk

Item 11.

City Hall Council Chamber
1515 Sixth Street, Coachella, California
(760) 398-3502  www.coachella.org

MINUTES

OF A SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE

CITY OF COACHELLA

CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING

THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE COACHELLA SANITARY DISTRICT,

COACHELLA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COACHELLA FINANCING AUTHORITY,

COACHELLA EDUCATIONAL AND GOVERNMENTAL ACCESS CABLE CHANNEL CORPORATION,

COACHELLA WATER AUTHORITY, AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COACHELLA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY August 07, 2023
6:00 PM – SPECIAL MEETING
In-Person Meeting
Location:

Coachella City Hall
Council Chamber
1515 Sixth Street
Coachella, CA
If you would like to attend the meeting via Zoom, here is the link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88457271898?pwd=REdzU1NoQmpVSFhWTDVaZ0VCekYxdz09 Or One tap mobile : 16699006833,,88457271898#,,,,*606140# Or Telephone:

US: +1 669 900 6833
Webinar ID: 884 5727 1898
Passcode: 606140
Spanish: El idioma español está disponible en Zoom seleccionado la opción en la parte de abajo de la pantalla
 Public comments may be received either in person, via email, telephonically, or via Zoom with a limit of 250 words, or three minutes:
o In Real Time:

If participating in real time via Zoom or phone, during the Public Comment Period, use the “raise hand” function on your computer, or when using a phone, participants can raise their hand by pressing *9 on the keypad.
o In Writing:

Written comments may be submitted to the City Council electronically via email to [email protected]. Transmittal prior to the start of the meeting is required. All written comments received will be forwarded to the City Council and entered into the record. o If you wish, you may leave a message at (760) 262-6240 before 5:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting.  The live stream of the meeting may be viewed online by accessing the city's website at www.coachella.org, and clicking on the "Watch Council Meetings" tab located on the home page, and then clicking on the "live" button.

CALL TO ORDER:

Item 12.

Minutes City Council Special Meeting August 07, 2023

The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Coachella was called to order at 6:03 P.M.

ROLL CALL:

PRESENT: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza (arrived at 6:11pm), Mayor Hernandez
ABSENT: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa
City Clerk Zepeda, City Treasurer Aviles
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
“At this time the Council/ Board/Corporation/Authority may announce any items being pulled from the Agenda or continued to another date or request the moving of an item on the agenda” Motion: To approve agenda.

Made by: Councilmember Virgen
Seconded by: Mayor Hernandez
Approved: 3-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Mayor Hernandez, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Delgado NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza (arrived at 6:11pm) RECONVENE REGULAR MEETING:

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

City Manager Dr. Martin led The Pledge of Allegiance.

CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS:

None.

PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS:

None.

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:

Item 12.

Minutes City Council Special Meeting August 07, 2023

None.

CONSENT CALENDAR:
(It is recommended that Consent Items be acted upon simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by a Council Member or member of the audience.) NEW BUSINESS CALENDAR (LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE):

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2023-59 Authorizing an Application by the City of Coachella Requesting the Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission to take Proceeding for a Sphere of Influence Amendment to Include the Pocket 7 Area Within the City of Coachella Sphere of Influence Boundary Motion: To approve per staff recommendation.

Made by: Mayor Hernandez
Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Approved: 4-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Virgen, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa
PUBLIC HEARING CALENDAR (QUASI-JUDICIAL):

PUBLIC COMMENTS (NON-AGENDA ITEMS):

The public may address the City Council/Board/Corporation/ Authority on any item of interest to the public that is not on the agenda but is in the subject matter jurisdiction thereof. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes.

None.

REPORTS AND REQUESTS:

Council Comments/Report of Miscellaneous Committees. - None.

City Manager’s Comments. - None
ADJOURNMENT:

There being no further business to come before the City Council and the Agencies, Mayor Hernandez adjourned the meeting at 6:29 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Item 12.

Minutes City Council Special Meeting August 07, 2023

_____________________
Angela M. Zepeda
City Clerk

Item 12.

City Hall Council Chamber
1515 Sixth Street, Coachella, California
(760) 398-3502  www.coachella.org

MINUTES

OF A SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE

CITY OF COACHELLA

THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE COACHELLA SANITARY DISTRICT,

COACHELLA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COACHELLA FINANCING AUTHORITY,

COACHELLA EDUCATIONAL AND GOVERNMENTAL ACCESS CABLE CHANNEL CORPORATION,

COACHELLA WATER AUTHORITY, AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COACHELLA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY August 23, 2023
6:00 PM – SPECIAL MEETING
In-Person Meeting
Location:

Coachella City Hall
Council Chamber
1515 Sixth Street
Coachella, CA
If you would like to attend the meeting via Zoom, here is the link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88457271898?pwd=REdzU1NoQmpVSFhWTDVaZ0VCekYxdz09 Or One tap mobile : 16699006833,,88457271898#,,,,*606140# Or Telephone:

US: +1 669 900 6833
Webinar ID: 884 5727 1898
Passcode: 606140
Spanish: El idioma español está disponible en Zoom seleccionado la opción en la parte de abajo de la pantalla
 Public comments may be received either in person, via email, telephonically, or via Zoom with a limit of 250 words, or three minutes:
o In Real Time:

If participating in real time via Zoom or phone, during the Public Comment Period, use the “raise hand” function on your computer, or when using a phone, participants can raise their hand by pressing *9 on the keypad.
o In Writing:

Written comments may be submitted to the City Council electronically via email to [email protected]. Transmittal prior to the start of the meeting is required. All written comments received will be forwarded to the City Council and entered into the record. o If you wish, you may leave a message at (760) 262-6240 before 5:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting.  The live stream of the meeting may be viewed online by accessing the city's website at www.coachella.org, and clicking on the "Watch Council Meetings" tab located on the home page, and then clicking on the "live" button.

CALL TO ORDER: - 6:00 P.M.

Item 13.

Minutes City Council Special Meeting August 23, 2023

ROLL CALL:

PRESENT: Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Delgado (arrived at 6:01pm) City Clerk Zepeda, City Treasure Aviles
ABSENT: None
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
“At this time the Council/ Board/Corporation/Authority may announce any items being pulled from the Agenda or continued to another date or request the moving of an item on the agenda” Motion: To approve the agenda as presented.

Made by: Councilmember Dr. Figueroa
Seconded by: Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
Approved: 4-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Delgado (arrived at 6:01pm)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

City Manager Dr. Martin led The Pledge of Allegiance.

NEW BUSINESS CALENDAR (LEGISLATIVE AND ADMINISTRATIVE):

1. Resolution No. 2023-60 Ratifying and Declaring a Local Emergency Related to Hurricane/Tropical Storm Hillary
Motion: To approve staff recommendation.

Made by: Mayor pro Tem Galarza
Seconded by: Mayor Hernandez
Approved: 5-0, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmember Virgen, Councilmember Dr. Figueroa, Mayor Hernandez, Mayor Pro Tem Galarza, Councilmember Delgado
NOES: None

Item 13.

Minutes City Council Special Meeting August 23, 2023

ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS (NON-AGENDA ITEMS):

The public may address the City Council/Board/Corporation/ Authority on any item of interest to the public that is not on the agenda but is in the subject matter jurisdiction thereof. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes.

None.

ADJOURNMENT:

There being no further business to come before the City Council and the Agencies, Mayor Hernandez adjourned the meeting at 6:44 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,
_____________________
Angela M. Zepeda
City Clerk

Item 13.

STAFF REPORT
9/13/2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Gabriel Perez, Development Services Director
SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance No. 1206 - City of Coachella Objective Design Standards for Multi-family Residential and Mixed-Use development - Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 22-04 is a proposal to amend Coachella Municipal Code Title 17, Zoning, adopting objective design standards for multi-family residential development to apply to G-N General Neighborhood, U-N Urban Neighborhood, DT-PV Downtown Pueblo Viejo, DT-PV Transition, U-E Urban Employment and Neighborhood Commercial zones. (Second Reading)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1206 approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 22-04 that amends the Coachella Municipal Code Title 17 (Zoning) to require objective design standards for multi-family residential and mixed-use developments.

BACKGROUND:

The State of California adopted Senate Bill (SB) 35 and SB 330 to address the State housing crisis and reduce barriers to housing production. The laws require cities to review new multi-family residential development administratively in compliance with objective design standards.

Objective design standards are considered objective if they are measurable and verifiable and involve no subjective judgement by a City official.

Housing Accountability Act
The Housing Accountability Act (HAA) was first passed as California state law in 1982 identifying a lack of housing as a statewide problem and allows the State to limit local governments from denying, reducing density of, or make infeasible housing development project, emergency shelters or farmworker housing that are consistent with a city’s objective development standards then the project approval authority must approve the application and issue permits within 90 to 180 days.

Senate Bill 35
Senate Bill 35 passed as California state law in 2017 to increase housing supply and allows developers of affordable multi-family residential and mixed-use development projects to submit an application under a streamlined ministerial review process for cities that have not met their share of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). Projects pursuing streamlined review under SB 35 must include:

Item 14.
 10 percent of units as affordable to lower-income households making at or below 80 percent of the Average Median Income.
 Project sites zoned for residential use, mixed-use development or have a general plan designation that allows for residential use or a mixed-use development.

If the development meets all state criteria then the project must be approved in 90 days for development with less than 150 units and 180 days for development with more than 150 units.

Only objective design standards may be applied in the design review of SB 35 eligible projects.

Senate Bill 330
Senate Bill 330, Housing Crisis Act, was effective January 2, 2020 and sunsets January 1, 2025 with the intent of increasing production of housing and further limiting the ability of cities to apply regulations that limit housing production. SB 330 applies to residential projects and mixed-use projects with two-thirds square footage for residential units. SB 330 limits the ability of cities to:

 Change the land use designation or zoning of sites that reduces capacity of housing units below what was allowed under the land use designation as of January 1, 2018, except with a concurrent increase capacity for housing units in land use designation or zoning of sites elsewhere.
 Adopt a moratorium on housing development.
 Apply subjective design standards in the design review of residential development.

The City of Coachella has not adopted objective design standards and there are only residential design guidelines in the Pueblo Viejo Implementation Strategy Plan and Single Family Residential design guidelines that are not considered standards and many of the guidelines would be considered objective in nature. Crandall Arambula is the consulting firm that worked with City staff in the development of the draft objective development standards for multi-family residential development as presented in this staff report.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The draft objective development standards presented in this report would apply citywide to multifamily residential development and mixed-use development. The draft Ordinance would amend the City of Coachella Municipal Code (C.M.C.), Title 17, Zoning, and would be consistent with the development standards identified in the G-N General Neighborhood, U-N Urban Neighborhood, DT-PV Downtown Pueblo Viejo, DT-PV Transition, U-E Urban Employment and Neighborhood Commercial zones. The City Council is scheduled to consider revised zoning and development standards under the Zoning Consistency Update that would adopt the G-N General Neighborhood, U-N Urban Neighborhood, DT-PV Downtown Pueblo Viejo, DT-PV Transition, and U-E Urban Employment zones at their regular City Council meeting on June 21, 2023.

The draft objective design standards are organized into site planning and building design standards for multi-family housing. Figures are includes in the design standards to identify visually how building form and site design are to be implemented. The Multi-family Site Planning Development

Item 14.
and Design Standards are intended to ensure minimum standards for aesthetics, walkability, and safety for a multi-family project’s site design that includes:
 Public Realm Standards. These standards apply to street rights-of-way and any necessary easement and include a parkway zone, sidewalk zone, and transition area zone. These standards define the function and character of the perimeter right-of-way areas and are organized according to three street types. (Street Type A – Narrower streets with lower traffic volumes of 15,000 average daily trips, Street B – Wider streets with higher traffic volumes of more than 15,000 average daily trips, Street Type C – private streets less than 5,000 average daily trips).
 Public Realm Transition Standards. These standards establish requirements for required building setback behind the public realm line along Street Type A and B.  Site Landscaping Standards. These standards require drought tolerant landscaping and minimum common area landscaping standards.
 Site Outdoor Illumination Standards. These standards establish minimum illumination requirements to ensure nighttime safety for residents and other users.  Site and Public Realm Utilities Standards. These standards are intended to ensure utilities do not detract from visual quality of the public realm or building facades.  Site Freestanding Walls, Fences, and Gates Standards
 Site Solid Waste Container Enclosure Standards. These standards are intended to ensure garbage areas are properly located and screened from view of the public realm.

The Multi-family Building Design Standards are intended to ensure minimum design standards that ensure quality in the form and character of the building environment which includes:
 Building Modulation These standards establish minimum design standards for the form and character of proposed building that includes: horizontal and vertical modulation, roof form and materials, façade color, façade materials, and fenestration.  Residential entry standards. These standards apply to first floor residential entries to encourage street-oriented pedestrian activity that includes both lobby entries and individual residential unit entries. A minimum of 5 feet is required behind the public realm line and the first floor entrances.
 First floor transparency standards. These standards are intended to ensure engagement with the public realm and providing transparency between the pedestrian realm and first floor uses.

General Plan Consistency
The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan in that it promotes the public health, safety and welfare by imposing objective design standards for the public realm, site and building design.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Item 14.

The Planning Division completed an initial environmental assessment of the project per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Planning Division completed an initial environmental assessment of the project per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Staff recommends the City Council determine that the draft Objective Design Standards are exempt from further review of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is an administrative activity which will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment and is not a "project" as defined by section 15378 pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines 15060(c)(2 and 3) and 15061(b)(3). The Ordinance will not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed in the Coachella General Plan 2035 and the Zoning Ordinance.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no expected fiscal impact of the adoption of Objective Design Standards. The adoption of the Objective Design Standards would provide greater certainty to residents, property owners, and developers in the development review process for the expectations for the design of multifamily and mixed-use developments. The Objective Design Standards program also establishes a streamlined ministerial application process for eligible affordable housing projects under State Law.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Adopt Ordinance No. 1206 approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 22-04 that amends the Coachella Municipal Code Title 17 (Zoning) to require objective design standards for multi-family residential and mixed-use developments.

2. Deny Ordinance No. 1206.

3. Continue this item and provide staff with direction.

RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE(S):

Staff recommends Alternative #1 as noted above.

Attachment:

1. Ordinance No. 1206, Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 23-04 Exhibit A – Objective Design Standards Multi-family Residential Project Modifications to Title 17, Zoning Ordinance

Item 14.

ORDINANCE NO. 1206

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
COACHELLA MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 17, ZONING, TO

ESTABLISH OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS

APPLICABLE TO THE DESIGN OF MULTIPLE FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND MIXED-USE
DEVELOPMENT. CITY-INITIATED
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted to the City of Coachella (“City”) by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City has the police power to regulate the use of land and property within the City in a manner designed to promote public convenience and general prosperity, as well as public health, welfare, and safety; and, WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 35, went into effect January 1, 2018 and is intended to encourage the production of housing to address the California housing crisis, which streamlined and ministerial review process for eligible multi-family housing projects; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 330, went into effect January 1, 2020 and is intended to increase the production of housing and limit the ability of cities to apply regulations that limit housing production; and
WHEREAS, the State Laws referenced allow cities to regulate the design of multiplefamily residential and mixed-use development with the adoption of objective design standards if they are measurable and verifiable and involve no subjective judgement by a City official.

WHEREAS, the proposed Ordinance would amend Title 17 (Zoning) to implement the establish objective design standards that allow the City to regulate the design of multiple-family residential and mixed-use development as required under State Law.

WHEREAS, based on that analysis, the City Council finds that the Objective Design Standards are exempt from further review of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is an administrative activity which will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment and is not a "project" as defined by section 15378 pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines 15060(c)(2 and 3) and 15061(b)(3). The Ordinance will not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed in the Coachella General Plan 2035 and the Zoning Ordinance.

WHEREAS, on June 7, 2023 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to review the project at which time during the hearing members of the public were given an opportunity to testify regarding the Project; and
WHEREAS, after said public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this Ordinance.

Item 14.

WHEREAS, on July 26, 2023 the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to review the project at which time during the hearing members of the public were given an opportunity to testify regarding the Project; and

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The City Council of the City of Coachella, California, hereby finds that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as substantive findings of this Ordinance.

SECTION 2. Amendment to Municipal Code Title 17, Zoning, is hereby amended as identified in Objective Design Standards Exhibit A.1 and amending Coachella Municipal Code Chapter 17.20
SECTION 3. CEQA Analysis. The Planning Division prepared an environmental assessment for the proposed zoning ordinance amendment and based on that analysis the City Council finds that the Objective Design Standards are exempt from further review of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is an administrative activity which will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment and is not a "project" as defined by section 15378 pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines 15060(c)(2 and 3) and 15061(b)(3). The Ordinance will not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed in the Coachella General Plan 2035 and the Zoning Ordinance.

SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance, or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. Publication and Effective Date. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause this Ordinance to published or posted as required by law, which shall take full force and effect thirty (30) days from its adoption.

Item 14.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th of September, 2023 by the following vote:

Steven Hernandez, Mayor
City of Coachella
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Angela M. Zepeda, City Clerk
City of Coachella
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Carlos Campos, Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney

Item 14.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

CITY OF COACHELLA
)
) ss.
)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No.1206 was duly and regularly introduced at a meeting of the City Council on the 26th day of July 2023, and that thereafter the said ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 13th day of September 2023.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Delia Granados
Deputy City Clerk

Item 14.

Chapter 17.20
Coachella Multi-Family
Objective Design Standards (ODS)
Final Draft
June 30, 2023

Item 14.

Chapter 17.20 – OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL

17.20.010 Multifamily Site Design Standards
A. Applicability. The development and design standards provided in this subsection shall apply to G-N General Neighborhood, U-N Urban Neighborhood, and applies to multi-family residential buildings in the DTPV Downtown Pueblo Viejo zone, DT-PV Transition zone, and the U-E Urban Employment, and Neighborhood Commercial Zone District. The following development and design standards shall be used in determining a project’s consistency with the purpose of this Code of Ordinances and with the policies of the General Plan related to site design. The standards shall apply to all new multi-family residential building construction. Review of projects under this subsection is ministerial and shall be consistent with 17.72.

Architectural Review procedures and requirements.

B. Public Realm Standards.

The public realm standards apply to street rights-of-way and any necessary easement. The public realm standards define the function and character of the perimeter rights-of-way that provide pedestrian circulation, access, amenities and a buffer transition between roadways and multi-family buildings.

1. Street Types. The street type standards address the full range of roadway conditions where adjacent multifamily uses may occur citywide. The intent of the standards is to establish the minimum requirements for pedestrian and resident comfort, safety, and access while ensuring that all multifamily or mixed-use development is economically viable. The standards consider the relationship between motor vehicle traffic volume, speed, and traffic lane geometry and provide the appropriate minimum width of the public realm that is necessary to create a livable and vibrant environment.

The standards provide three options with different public realm geometry between the curb and building façades in response to different Coachella existing or planned roadway conditions. a. Street Type A. These streets generally are narrower and have lower traffic volumes, less than 15,000 Average Daily Trips (ADT). Multi-family buildings on sites that front Urban Residential with Parking, Urban Street 2-Lane, and Urban Street 4-Lane typologies as designated in the Coachella General Plan Chapter 05 Mobility Element shall comply with these standards. b. Street Type B. These streets generally are wider and have higher traffic volumes greater than 15,000 ADT. Multi-family buildings on sites that front Major Arterial, Primary Arterial, or Collector Street typologies as designated in the Coachella General Plan Chapter 05 Mobility Element shall comply with these standards.
c. Street Type C. These private street standards apply to sites that include internal site multimodal access streets that have very low volumes less than 5,000 ADT. Multi-family sites that include private roadways shall comply with these standards.

Item 14.

2. Public Realm Summary Table. The summary Table 1 provides an at-a-glance summary of all street types and standards that apply. Complete description of the standards intent, setback, and zones for each are provided on the following pages.

Item 14.

3. Street Type A Standards.
a. Public Realm Setback. All new multi-family development on sites that front Urban Residential with Parking, Urban Street 2-Lane, and Urban Street 4-Lane shall comply with a 15-foot minimum first floor setback measured from the back-of-curb to the public realm-line on public streets. No first-floor building façade shall be located beyond the public realm-line as specified in Figure

17.20.010.1.

FIGURE 17.20.010.1

STREET TYPE A PUBLIC REALM STANDARDS

Item 14.
i. Public easement— a 5-foot public realm easement shall be provided. ii. Structural exemptions— 1-foot wide (maximum) building at-grade projections, columns, posts, or pilasters are permitted in the Transition Area Zone (TAZ) required public realm easement. A minimum of 4-foot width between the building structure and the Sidewalk Zone (SWZ) shall be provided.
iii. Weather protection— awnings and canopies that extend a maximum of 5 feet over the public realm are permitted. A minimum vertical clearance of 8 feet measured from the public realm finished grade to the bottom of the awning or canopy structural components shall be provided.

4. Street Type A Public Realm Zones. The intent of the multi-family public realm standards is to foster a safe, direct, and comfortable pedestrian access to first floor residential entries, internal driveways, common spaces, and paseos and encourage first floor street-oriented residential activity and visibility. Three distinct and contiguous sidewalk zones comprise the public realm. a. Parkway Zone (PKZ). There shall be a required 4-foot PKZ width measured from the back-ofcurb to the Sidewalk Zone (SWZ). i. Landscaping— all PKZ shall be landscaped a minimum of 20 percent of the total multifamily development site frontage(s). All landscaping shall be selected, installed, irrigated, and maintained per 8.44.220 California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) requirements and according to City approved landscape plans. Turf grass shall be prohibited. A combination of decomposed granite mulching and drought tolerant native and desert-adaptable shrubs, succulents, groundcover, and ornamental trees shall be permitted. Street trees shall be spaced a maximum of 25 feet on-center and have a minimum canopy radius of 15 feet and shall cover a minimum of 20 percent of paved areas at maturity. Landscape beds and tree wells shall have a minimum dimension of 4 feet in width and 12 feet in length. Live plant materials shall constitute a minimum of 25 percent of all surface area coverage at installation. A permanent underground irrigation system shall be installed. Spray irrigation shall be prohibited. ii. Street furniture— benches, transit shelters, tables, chairs, trash receptacles, public art, bike racks are not required but shall be permitted.
iii. Illumination— sidewalk light poles and fixtures are not required but shall be permitted. iv. Paving— poured in place concrete, stone, concrete or brick unit pavers are permitted. A maximum of 80 percent paving of the PKZ shall be permitted. Cast iron tree grates shall be permitted and shall be included in any paving calculation. v. Utilities— transmission line poles, sidewalk and roadway light poles and fixtures, utility boxes and vaults, and traffic control devices, are permitted in the parkway zone. All applicable utility standards of Coachella Code Chapter 16.32 Design and Development Standards shall apply.
vi. Signs— temporary or permanent roadway or wayfinding signs shall be permitted.

Advertising or development identification signs shall be prohibited. All signs shall comply with Coachella Chapter 5.48 Outdoor Advertising Sign Standards and all applicable traffic federal and local sign standards, as specified in Figure 17.20.XXX.1.

Item 14.
b. Sidewalk Zone (SWZ). There shall be a required 6-foot SWZ width measured between the Parkway Zone to the Transition Area Zone.
i. Accessibility— The required SWZ width shall remain clear of all obstructions to maintain universal access. Steps and rough textured surface treatments are prohibited within the SWZ.
ii. Street furniture—permanent or temporary street furniture shall be prohibited. iii. Paving— the SWZ shall consist of poured in place scored concrete or concrete, brick, or stone unit pavers. Stamped concrete is prohibited.
iv. Landscaping— plant material in beds or pots shall be prohibited. Any landscape material planted in the TAZ or PKZ shall not project into the SWZ at a height less than 8 feet above finished SWZ grade.
v. Signs—temporary or permanent signs shall be prohibited. vi. Walls and fences—temporary or permanent fences or enclosures shall be prohibited. vii. Illumination— sidewalk-oriented light poles and fixtures shall be prohibited. viii. Utilities— fire hydrants, transmission line poles, utility boxes, and traffic control devices shall be prohibited. Below grade utility lines and vaults shall be permitted. c. Transition Area Zone (TAZ). There shall be a minimum 5-foot TAZ width measured from the SWZ to the public realm-line.
i. Landscaping— the TAZ shall be landscaped a minimum of 20 percent of the total site frontage(s). All landscaping shall be selected, installed, irrigated, and maintained per

8.44.220 California MWELO requirements. Landscaping and trees shall comply with the 2022 Coachella Grapefruit Boulevard Standards (CGBS) Sections 5.106.12 through 5.106.12.3. A combination of decomposed granite mulching and drought tolerant native and desertadaptable shrubs, succulents, ground cover, and ornamental trees shall be permitted. No planting bed shall be less than 3 feet in width. Live plant materials shall constitute a minimum of 25 percent of all surface area coverage at installation. A permanent underground irrigation system shall be installed. Spray irrigation shall be prohibited. ii. Street furniture— permanent or temporary seating shall be permitted in the TAZ. iii. Paving— permitted paved surfaces shall consist of brick, concrete, or stone unit pavers, concrete banding, or scored or brushed concrete with integral color pigment that is complementary but distinguished from the SWZ paving. Stamped concrete shall be prohibited. Steps that provide access to above-grade front door entrances are permitted. iv. Illumination— building wall washing uplighting and landscape accent light poles and fixtures less than 18 inches in height shall be permitted. Sidewalk light poles and fixtures are permitted.
v. Walls and fences— retaining or landscape planter concrete or masonry walls or wrought iron fences 42 inches or less in height are permitted. Walls and fences shall include a landscaped setback of a minimum 2 feet width from the SWZ.
vi. Utilities—ground or façade mounted utilities shall be screened. Below grade utility vaults or lines shall be permitted in the TAZ.
vii. Parking— below grade parking structures shall be permitted in the TAZ.

Item 14.

5. Street Type B Standards.
a. Public Realm Setback. All new development in multi-family sites that front Major Arterial, Primary Arterial, or Collector street shall comply with a 20-foot minimum first floor setback measured from the back-of-curb to the public realm-line on public streets. No first-floor building façade shall be located beyond the public realm-line as specified in Figure 17.20.010.2.

FIGURE 17.20.010.2

STREET TYPE B PUBLIC REALM STANDARDS
i. Public easement— a 10 foot easement shall be provided.

Item 14.
ii. Structural exemptions— 1-foot wide building at-grade projections, columns, posts, or pilasters are permitted in the Transition Area Zone (TAZ) required public realm easement.

A minimum of 3-foot width between the building structure and the Sidewalk Zone (SWZ) shall be provided.
iii. Weather protection— awnings and canopies that extend a maximum of 5-feet over the public realm are permitted. A minimum vertical clearance of 8 feet measured from the public realm finished grade to the bottom of the awning or canopy structural components shall be provided.

6. Street Type B Public Realm Zones. The intent of the Street Type B public realm is to foster safe and comfortable pedestrian access to multi-family sites that front busier streets with traffic volumes greater than 15,000 ADT by providing a more robust landscaped buffer between the roadway and the sidewalk. Three distinct and contiguous sidewalk zones comprise the public realm. a. Parkway Zone (PKZ). There shall be a required 10-foot parkway zone width measured from the back-of-curb to the SWZ.
i. Landscaping— the PKZ shall be landscaped a minimum of 60 percent of the total multifamily development site frontage(s). All landscaping shall be selected, installed, irrigated, and maintained per 8.44.220 California MWELO requirements and according to City approved landscape plans. Turf grass shall be prohibited. A combination of decomposed granite mulching and drought tolerant native and desert-adaptable shrubs, succulents, groundcover, and ornamental trees shall be permitted. Street trees shall be spaced a maximum of 25 feet on-center and have a minimum canopy radius of 15 feet at maturity.

Landscape beds and tree wells shall have a minimum dimension of 4 feet in width and 12 feet in length. Live plant materials shall constitute a minimum of 25 percent of all surface area coverage at installation. A permanent underground irrigation system shall be installed.

Spray irrigation shall be prohibited.
ii. Street furniture— benches, transit shelters, tables, chairs, trash receptacles, public art, bike racks shall be permitted.
iii. Illumination— sidewalk light poles and fixtures are permitted. iv. Paving— poured in place concrete, brick, concrete, or stone unit pavers are permitted. A maximum of 40 percent paving of the PKZ shall be permitted. Cast iron tree grates shall be permitted and shall be included in any paving calculation. v. Utilities— transmission line poles, sidewalk and roadway light poles and fixtures, utility boxes and vaults, and traffic control devices, are permitted in the parkway zone. iv. Signs— temporary or permanent roadway or wayfinding signs shall be permitted.

Advertising or development identification signs shall be prohibited. b. Sidewalk Zone (SWZ). There shall be a required 6-foot sidewalk zone width measured between the Parkway Zone to the Transition Area Zone. There shall be no variation in location or width of the SWZ. Serpentine or curved sidewalk alignment is prohibited. i. Accessibility— the required sidewalk zone width shall remain clear of all obstructions to maintain universal access. Steps are prohibited within the sidewalk zone. ii. Paving— the SWZ shall consist of poured in place scored concrete or concrete, brick, or stone unit pavers. Stamped concrete is prohibited.

Item 14.
iii. Street furniture— Permanent or temporary street furniture shall be prohibited. iv. Landscaping— plant material in beds or pots shall be prohibited. Any landscape material planted in the TAZ or PKZ shall not project into the SWZ at a height less than 8 feet above finished SWZ grade.
v. Signs—temporary or permanent signs shall be prohibited. vi. Walls and fences—temporary or permanent fences or enclosures shall be prohibited. vii. Illumination— sidewalk-oriented light poles and fixtures shall be prohibited. viii. Utilities— fire hydrants, transmission line poles, utility boxes, and traffic control devices shall be prohibited. Below grade utility lines and vaults shall be permitted. c. Transition Area Zone (TAZ). There shall be a minimum 4-foot Transition area Zone width measured from the Sidewalk Zone to the public realm-line. i. Landscaping— landscaping shall consist of a minimum of 50 percent of the total site frontage(s) excluding any frontage that includes an arcade. All landscaping shall be selected, installed, irrigated, and maintained per 8.44.220 California MWELO requirements Landscaping and trees shall comply with the 2022 Coachella Grapefruit Boulevard Standards (CGBS) Sections 5.106.12 through 5.106.12.3. A combination of decomposed granite mulching and drought tolerant native and desert-adaptable shrubs, succulents, groundcover, and ornamental trees shall be permitted. No planting bed shall be less than 3 feet in width. Live plant materials shall constitute a minimum of 25 percent of all surface area coverage at installation. A permanent underground irrigation system shall be installed.

Spray irrigation shall be prohibited.
ii. Street furniture— permanent or temporary seating shall be permitted in the TAZ. iii. Paving— to increase the width of the SWZ, permitted paved surfaces shall consist of brick, concrete, or stone unit pavers, concrete banding, or scored or brushed concrete with integral color pigment that is complementary but distinguished from the SWZ paving.

Stamped concrete shall be prohibited. Steps that provide access to above-grade front door entrances are permitted.
iv. Illumination— building wall washing uplighting and landscape accent light poles and fixtures less than 18 inches in height shall be permitted. Sidewalk light poles and fixtures are permitted.
v. Walls and fences— retaining or landscape planter concrete or masonry walls or wrought iron fences 72 inches or less in height are permitted. Walls and fences shall include a landscaped setback of a minimum 2 feet width from the SWZ. vi. Utilities—ground or façade mounted utilities shall be screened. Below grade utility vaults or lines shall be permitted in the TAZ.
vii. Parking— below grade parking structures shall be permitted in the TAZ.

Item 14.

7. Street Type C Standards.
a. Private Street Standards. The intent of private street standards is to foster a low speed, multi-modal access where driving, walking and cycling space can be integrated. All new development sites that include private roadways shall comply with a 48-foot minimum right-ofway width measured between the fronting build-to lines. No portion of any building façade shall be located beyond the build-to line as specified in Figure 17.20.010.3.

FIGURE 17.20.010.3

STREET TYPE C STANDARDS

Item 14.
i. Public access— an access easement for walking and biking shall be provided for private property internal streets. Access shall be maintained 24 hours per day and all days of the year. No walking and biking ingress or egress from public streets shall be gated. ii. Amenity— the streets shall be designed as a component of an integrated system of common open spaces and paseos of the site while providing essential auto and delivery access to access parking garages and first floor residential entries. The design of the streets shall be unified, consistently utilizing the same paving, landscaping, illumination, and street furniture elements of paseos and common open spaces. iii. Speed limit— a maximum 15 mile per hour speed limit shall be required for all internal private streets. Speed humps, tabled intersections, or other Fire Department approved traffic calming measures shall be provided to ensure low speeds.

8. Street Type C Private Street Zones. Three integrated and blended street zones comprise the private streets.
a. Shared Roadway Zone (SRZ). Motor vehicle traffic shall be permitted to include either oneway or two-way traffic patterns. A 20-foot minimum width multi-modal roadway shall be provided.
i. Fire access— all roadways shall comply with fire apparatus access standards of the California Fire Code and the Riverside County Fire Department. ii. Surface treatment— paving shall be asphalt, stone, brick or concrete unit pavers or poured in place concrete with integral color pigment. Stamped concrete shall be prohibited.
iii. Curb free — streets shall be integrated with the Pedestrian Refuge Zone. Curbless or rolled curbs shall be permitted.
iv. Illumination— cantenary street lighting shall be permitted. Emergency and maintenance vehicle height clearances shall be maintained.
v. Parking— one-sided parallel curbside parking (8-foot maximum width) in addition to the minimum 20-foot width shall be permitted. Angled or head-in parking shall be prohibited. b. Sidewalk Zone (SWZ). Two SWZ zones shall be provided. The zones are intended to provide a pedestrian-protected area free of motor vehicle traffic. A 6-foot width measured from the back-of-curb to the Transition area Zone shall be provided. i. Universal accessibility— the zone shall include a 5-foot (minimum) wide clear width that is free of all obstructions to maintain American Disabilities Act (ADA) access. Steps or ramps are prohibited within the zone.
ii. Physical separation — cast iron or concrete bollards shall be provided to protect pedestrians from the shared street within a 1-foot zone from the back of the curb.

Bollards shall be spaced a maximum of 10 feet on-center. Traffic or wayfinding poles shall be permitted within this zone between the bollards. iii. Paving— paving shall be brick or concrete unit pavers or poured in place concrete with integral color pigments. Concrete banding and scoring pattern shall differentiate the SWZ from the SRZ. Differentiated stone, brick or concrete paving, differentiated concrete banding and scoring patterns shall be provided at parking garage and intersection conflict points.

Item 14.
iv. Street furniture— benches, tables, chairs, trash receptacles, and bike racks are prohibited in the zone.
v. Landscaping— shrubs, groundcover, and street trees are prohibited in the zone. Any landscaping planted in the adjacent Transition Area Zone shall not project into the SRZ at a height less than 8 feet above finished SRZ grade.
vi. Utilities— transmission line poles, utility boxes and vaults are prohibited in the zone. c. Transition Area Zone (TAZ). There shall be a minimum 4-foot transition area zone width measured from the SWZ to the build-to line.
i. Landscaping— the TAZ shall be comprised of a minimum of 10 percent of the total building frontage(s). All landscaping shall be selected, installed, irrigated, and maintained per 8.44.220 California MWELO requirements. A combination of decomposed granite mulching and drought tolerant native and desert-adaptable shrubs, succulents, groundcover, and ornamental trees shall be permitted. Landscape planting beds shall have a minimum width of 3 feet. Any landscape material shall not project into the SWZ or SRZ at a height less than 8 feet above finished SRZ grade. ii. Paving— stone, brick or concrete unit pavers or poured in place concrete with integral color pigments is permitted in the TAZ. Steps are permitted to above grade first floor entrances.
iii. Street furniture— permanent or temporary seating shall be permitted in the transition area zone.
iv. Walls— retaining walls or landscape planting walls less than 42 inches in height shall be permitted.
v. Utilities— ground or façade mounted utilities shall be screened. Below grade utility vaults or lines are permitted.
vi. Parking— auto parking along driveway aprons shall be prohibited.

Item 14.

C. Public Realm Transition Standards. The intent of the standards is to address all potential first floor residential or commercial building conditions and establish requirements for any required building setback behind the public realm line along Street Type A and Street Type B. The standards prescribe at-grade and above grade conditions for first floor uses and conditions for upper floor projections.

1. First Floor Transition Area Use. All multi-family or multi-family mixed use development fronting either Street Type A and Street Type B shall comply with the following standards for the use of any site frontage area between the building facade and the public realm line. a. Motor Vehicle Parking and Service Access. Driveways shall be limited to the minimum width and length necessary to provide direct and efficient motor vehicle ingress to and egress from off-street parking, loading, or service parking spaces located behind a build-to-line. Rideshare drop-off and pick-up short-term parking spaces are permitted within the setback. b. Utilities. Public utilities vaults and transmission lines shall be fully screened or subterranean. c. Residential Unit Private Space Enclosures. Patio walls that are 42 inches or less in height above the finished grade of the adjacent public realm are permitted for Street Type A frontages; patio walls that are 60 inches or less in height above the finished grade of the adjacent public realm are permitted along Street Type B frontages. d. Steps, Stoops, or Terraces. Shall be prohibited along first floor commercial tenant storefront frontages. 30-inch (minimum) and 48 inch (maximum) height terraces, steps and stoops are permitted for first floor residential units. At-grade or above-grade individual residential entrances shall comply with all Multifamily Building Design Standards of this ordinance. e. Parking Garages. Subterranean parking garages, including below grade equipment, service, utility, and storage areas that extend to the property line are permitted. f. Landscaping. Any area between the public realm line and the building shall be landscaped a minimum of 60 percent of the total multi-family building frontage where at-grade ground floor residential units are provided. All landscaping shall comply with the site landscaping standards of this ordinance.
g. Exemptions. First floor residential units subject to California Building Code accessibility requirements shall all be exempt from the steps, stoops, or terrace standards and landscape standards. The landscape minimum area standards do not apply to building frontages where interior vertical circulation stairs and elevators; common areas, or lobbies occur.

Item 14.

2. At-Grade First Floor Residential Use. The intent of the standards is to provide adequate privacy separation between the first-floor unit interior living space and the public realm. All buildings with a first-floor residential units that are at-grade with the adjacent public realm shall comply with the following standards as specified in Figure 17.20.010.4
FIGURE 17.20.010.4

PUBLIC REALM TRANSITION STANDARDS

AT-GRADE FIRST FLOOR RESIDENTIAL USE SETBACK
a. Public Realm Line Setback. A minimum 5-foot first floor setback from the public realm line shall be provided for residential units.
b. Private First Floor Residential Use. Residential front door stoops or enclosed patios shall be permitted within the 5-foot minimum setback.
c. Projections. Upper floors of multi-family buildings are permitted to project over any first-floor setback to the public realm line. Upper floor residential balconies are permitted to project to the right-of-way (property line) or 5 feet, whichever is less.

Item 14.

3. Above-Grade First Floor Residential Use. The intent of the standards is to provide a privacy grade separation between the first-floor units and the public realm. Buildings shall comply with all the above-grade standards as specified in Figure 17.20.010.5 FIGURE 17.20.010.5

PUBLIC REALM TRANSITION STANDARDS

ABOVE-GRADE FIRST FLOOR RESIDENTIAL USE
a. Public Realm Line Zero Setback. Where residential units are constructed at the public realm line, the finished first floor shall be a minimum of 30 inches and a maximum of 48 inches above the adjacent public realm grade.
b. Private First Floor Residential Outdoor Use. Where provided, first floor balconies shall be permitted to project a maximum of 18 inches beyond the public realm line. Terraces shall not project beyond the public realm line.
c. Projections. Upper floors of multi-family buildings are permitted to project over any first-floor setback to the public realm line. Upper floor residential balconies are permitted to project to the right-of-way (property line) or 5 feet, whichever is less.

4. At-Grade Commercial Use. The intent of the standards is to permit direct first floor access between first floor commercial uses and the public realm. All mixed-use buildings with an at-grade

Item 14.
first floor commercial use that are adjacent public realm shall comply with the following standards as specified in Figure 17.20.010.6
FIGURE 17.20.010.6

PUBLIC REALM TRANSITION STANDARDS

MIXED USE BUILDINGS WITH FIRST FLOOR COMMERCIAL USE
a. Public Realm Setback. Mixed use multi-family development with a first-floor commercial component setbacks shall not be required.
b. Projections. Upper floors of multi-family buildings are permitted to project over any first-floor setback to the public realm line. Upper floor residential balconies and first floor or upper floor canopies or awnings are permitted to project to the right-of-way (property line) or 5 feet, whichever is less.

D. Site Landscaping Standards. Landscaping shall be provided to unify multiple buildings on development sites, enhance the enjoyment and beauty of public and private spaces, provide visual screening for existing adjacent uses, and aid in energy conservation by providing shade from the sun and shelter from the wind.

The following standards shall apply to the landscape materials, placement, layout and installation for all

Item 14.
multifamily zones, and mixed-use zones where multi-family building occur. All landscaping shall comply with any other applicable landscaping requirements identified in Chapter 17.60 Development Standards.

1. Desert Appropriate Landscaping Standards. All landscaping shall be selected, installed, irrigated, and maintained per any applicable 8.44.220 Coachella Model Water Efficient Landscape ordinance requirements and City approved landscape plans. a. Landscape Design. A combination of decomposed granite mulching and drought tolerant native and desert-adaptable shrubs, succulents, groundcover, and ornamental trees shall be provided for all required landscaped areas. Turf grass installation shall be prohibited throughout with the exception of active recreation areas. Live plant materials shall constitute a minimum of 25 percent of all surface area coverage at installation. b. Required irrigation. A permanent underground irrigation system shall be installed. Spray irrigation shall be permitted for recreation turf areas only.

2. Minimum Common Area Landscaping Standards. No less than 20 percent of the total required usable common open space for multifamily residential development shall be comprised of landscaped beds, planters, or pots.
a Planters and Pots Requirements. Planters and pots shall have a minimum length, width, diameter, and depth of 36 inches.
b. Minimum Planting Bed Dimensions. Beds shall be a minimum of 4 feet in width and 12 feet in length.
c. Required Landscape Areas. Landscaping is required in the setback area for individual residential units on the ground floor, except for where a walkway, ramp, stoop, or stairs are directly adjacent to the public realm. Landscaping shall be of an appropriate height to screen the residential unit walls and stoops.

Item 14.

E. Site Outdoor Illumination Standards. Minimum illumination requirements of multi-family and mixed development sites and adjacent public realm shall be provided to ensure nighttime safety for residents and other users. Lighting shall be permitted to animate gathering areas and extend hours of the day that residents use sidewalks and common spaces. No lighting shall create any unnecessary nuisance for site residents and adjoining property occupants.

1. General Provisions. All exterior lighting shall be designed, located and installed in order to prevent over-lighting, energy waste, glare, light trespass and unintentional sky glow. Lighting shall be permitted to highlight building and landscape features and provide Illumination for mixed use business operations.
a. Luminaires and Poles. Multifamily residential sites and building façades shall comply with the following standards.
i. Sky glow limitations— all parking lot and common area light fixtures shall be fully shielded, and dark sky rated.
ii. Maximum Illumination Impact— the extent of light coverage of all site light installations shall not exceed a 2-foot candle maximum illuminance impact on any fronting residential or commercial sites.
iii. Energy efficiency— all non-essential exterior mixed use commercial and multi-family residential lighting shall be turned off after business hours and/or when not in use. All commercial lights shall be on a timer.
iv. Security— sensor activated lights are to be used for security purpose lighting only.

Security luminaires shall not be triggered by activity off the development site, including the fronting public realm.
v. Glare restrictions— awning or canopy lights shall be fully recessed or fully shielded so as to ensure that no light source is visible from or causes glare on the public realm or adjacent properties.
vi. Exceptions— luminaries and poles used for resident recreation area courts, pools, and play areas shall be exempt from the height and illumination restrictions provided all other provisions of this section are met and the light is used only while the recreation area is in use.

2. Site Open Space, Public Realm, Roadway, and Exterior Building Lighting. All parking lots, accessible common areas, and private residential open space area lighting shall comply with all location requirements identified in the public realm standards of this subsection and the following additional location, height and illumination standards as follows:
a. Public Realm and Development Site Common Area Lighting. Pedestrian-oriented lighting shall have a maximum light pole and luminaire height of 15 feet. Sidewalk lighting shall have an average of 2-foot candles and a minimum of 1-foot candle and a maximum of 5-foot candles.
b. Landscape and Building Facade Accent Lighting. Glare-free direct accent light fixtures with an illumination ratio of less than 30:1 shall be permitted to highlight façade articulation, artwork, and landscape specimen plantings.
c. Parking Lot, Private Roadway, and Driveway Lighting. Parking area lights shall be greater in number, lower in height, and lower in light level, as opposed to fewer in number, higher in height, and higher in light level. The light pole and luminaire height shall be no greater than 18 feet above the parking lot finished grade. Parking lot lighting shall not exceed an overall average illumination of 1.5 foot-candles. Lighting shall have a minimum 1 foot candle and a maximum of 4 foot candles. Private roadway and driveway catenary or pole mounted luminaires shall be LED, unless otherwise determined City of Coachella Public Works.

Streetlights shall meet all City of Coachella Public Works illumination and standard specifications and procedures for installation height, number, and location.

Item 14.

F. Site and Public Realm Utilities Standards. Utilities required for the function and operation of any multi-family development shall be integrated into sites, facades, and roofs to ensure that they do not detract from the visual quality of a public realm or building facades, or pose health or safety hazards to residents, visitors, and employees. All development shall comply with any utility service provider requirements for access, maintenance, and service; and any applicable Engineering Department standards and specifications for installation. For all multi-family and mixed-use buildings and sites, the following standards shall be met.

1. Underground Utilities. New and existing utilities service connections including wires, cable, and pipelines and equipment shall be placed entirely below ground when located within a multi-family or mixed development site undergoing new development or redevelopment, and/or along the length of the front yard property line in the adjoining half-street, except when the following conditions are met:
a. Feasibility. Where undergrounding of utilities within a site is not feasible due to utility or infrastructure conflicts, topographic conditions, or site limitations. The Engineering Department Director shall have the authority to waive, limit, or modify the requirement for such improvements.
b. Exemptions. Fire hydrants and Fire Department connections as required by the International Fire Code, and any traffic control devices as required by the Engineering Department shall be exempted from all requirements of this ordinance.

2. Site At-Grade Utilities. Utility facilities that cannot feasibly be installed underground shall be located and screened with landscaping or walls consistent with the standards of this ordinance to minimize their impact.
a. Required screening. All exterior mechanical and electrical equipment, which includes, but is not limited to façade mounted or ground mounted Heating, Venting, and Cooling (HVAC) units, gas and electric utility meters, telecommunication equipment, backflow preventions, assemblies, irrigation control valves boxes, and electrical transformers shall be screened. i. Panels and meter locations— exterior utility panels and meters shall be located on building side yard or rear yard facades.
ii. Wall or vegetative screening requirements— walls, landscaping, or the combination of these screens shall have a minimum of 75 percent opacity and shall be a equal or exceed the height of the screened utilities. Screening walls shall utilize the same design elements, colors and materials of the building.
iii. Accessibility— all screening shall not prohibit access for maintenance and emergency service or repair. Access standards identified by utility providers shall be met.

3. Roof-mounted Utilities. Exposed mechanical equipment shall be visually screened by a 75 percent (minimum) opaque or solid, non-reflective visual barrier. The design and materials of the visual barrier shall comply with the following requirements:
a. Architectural Screening. Screening be comprised of parapets, screen walls, trellis systems, or mechanical penthouses and shall include common design elements and finish materials of the building facades. Screening shall be as high and wide or higher and wider than the equipment it screens.

4. Antennas. All telecommunication antennas, including but not limited to dishes, towers, and wires shall be installed and maintained in compliance with applicable requirements of the building code and standards of the Coachella Municipal Code Chapter 17.68- Antennas.

G. Site Freestanding Walls, Fences, and Gates Standards. The standards shall be applied for at-grade visual screening between multifamily buildings, the public realm, parking lots, and adjacent development; first floor residential unit privacy patio walls; and private residential or commercial common areas. No

Item 14.
freestanding wall, fence or gate shall preclude direct and convenient access for residents, visitors, or employees to building lobbies, or individual unit front doors from the public realm.

1. General Requirements. All walls and fences shall be installed and maintained in compliance with all applicable standards for residential single family zone fences of Chapter 17.60. a. Emergency Access. All wall fences shall not restrict access for fire department vehicles. All development shall comply with fire vehicle accessibility standards of the California Building Code, the Coachella Chapter 15.24- Fire Code, and shall be approved by the fire code official. The fire official shall have the authority to waive, limit, or modify the standards and requirements of this ordinance.
b. Swimming Pool Enclosure Fences. All fences required to enclosure swimming pools, hot tubs, spas, and associated facilities shall be exempt from these standards and shall comply with all California Building Code requirements and standards. c. Location. All freestanding walls, gates or fences shall be located a minimum of 2 feet behind any public realm line.
d. Materials. Walls shall be constructed of either masonry units that are clad in true stucco or Exterior Insulation Finishing Systems (EIFS), or decorative perforated breeze-block Concrete Masonry Units (CMU Blocks). Wrought iron fences are permitted when used in combination with evergreen landscaping that meets the 75 percent minimum opacity standard. Fences and gates constructed of chain link, wood, and vinyl are not permitted along public realm or common area frontages.

2. Parking Lot Screening Walls. All parking lots that front a public realm or common open space shall be screened by walls or a combination of walls, earth berming, and an evergreen hedge of equal height and opacity to the parking screen wall. All freestanding at-grade parking lot screening walls shall be a minimum of 42 inches in height and shall have a minimum of 75 percent opacity.

Item 14.

H. Site Solid Waste Container Enclosures Standards. Enclosures are necessary to ensure that garbage and recycling areas are properly located and screened from view from the public realm. Where possible solid waste containers should be located in a designated trash room of a building. Solid waste enclosures shall comply with the following standards:

1. Placement. Containers shall be placed behind the front façade of the primary building and outside of any easements and rights-of-way, unless expressly permitted by the City of Coachella. Containers and their screening enclosures shall be permitted to reduce the number of required parking stalls and maneuvering space. Required parking shall not be reduced without submittal and approval of an approved site plan.
a. Collection Vehicle Access. A 20-foot-wide unobstructed vehicular service drive must be maintained as measured from the truck collection side of an enclosure or container placement area. Containers and enclosures located perpendicular to or along a service drive must have no less than a 30-degree angle to the drive aisle.
b. Collection Vehicle Clearance. A minimum 24-foot height clearance must be maintained along the 15 feet of vehicular path closest to the servicing side of the solid waste container or enclosure to enable overhead lifting of the container for servicing. The remaining length of the unobstructed vehicular path must maintain a minimum 16-foot height clearance. A minimum 24-foot height clearance over containers must be maintained to allow overhead lifting of the container for servicing.

2. Container Screening. All containers shall be screened from view of adjacent streets, public open space, and directly adjacent side and rear yard properties. The enclosure shall be compatible in design, material, and color to the primary multifamily or mixed-use building(s) on the site. a. Concealed Service Area Placement. Containers shall be screened from view by buildings, freestanding screening walls, and/or combined within irrigated evergreen vegetated screen equal or greater in height of the enclosure. The containers should be located in a service area is an area at the rear or side of the building and designated for discreet service functions including deliveries, loading of goods, staging, solid waste collection and compaction, and similar activities supporting operations of the multi-family site. b. Enclosure Wall Design Standards. Enclosures shall be a minimum of 7 feet in height, 12 feet in width and length. Enclosures must be constructed of cast-in -place concrete or concrete masonry block. Wood, vinyl, wrought iron or chain link fences, cementitious or metal panels materials shall be prohibited. EIFS cladding shall be prohibited. Gates shall be provided that are solid, heavy-gauge metal or of a heavy-gauge metal frame clad with a heavy gauge sheet metal or other suitable, opaque material compatible to the primary multi-family structure. Fivefoot-high bollards shall be placed 1-foot from all sides of the structure. All screening walls must be continually maintained in a state of good repair. Living vegetative screens must be installed and maintained in compliance with the landscape standards of this ordinance.

Item 14.

17.20.015 Multi-family Building Design Standards
A. Applicability. The building design standards provided in this subsection shall apply to G-N General Neighborhood, U-N Urban Neighborhood, and applies to multi-family residential buildings in the DT-PV Downtown Pueblo Viejo zone, DT-PV Transition zone, and the U-E Urban Employment, and Neighborhood Commercial Zone District. The following design standards shall be used in determining a project’s consistency with the purpose of this Code of Ordinances and with the policies of the General Plan related to building design. The standards shall apply to all new multi-family residential building construction. Review of projects under this subsection is ministerial and shall be consistent with 17.72. Architectural Review procedures and requirements.

1. Building Modulation. The design of the building façade and roof shall be modulated to reduce the building’s scale— the perceived size and presence in relation to its existing or planned setting; and building massing— the overall volume of the structure. For all multifamily and mixed-use development, applicants shall select one of the four building modulation options. a. Development Standards. The selected option shall comply with the site’s development standards based upon the zone in which it is located, as identified in Tables 2-4 and 2-5 of this ordinance, including permitted minimum and maximum density, lot area requirements, yard requirements, encroachments for colonnades and arcades, height limits, stepbacks, distance between buildings, usable open space standards, and parking standards. b. Street Type. Standards for building modulation shall apply only to building façades fronting Street Type A, Street Type B, and Street Type C.
c. Common Area Façades. Standards for building modulation shall apply to façades that front usable open space common areas.
d. Sites with Multiple Buildings. Sites may be composed of multiple buildings utilizing one or more options.

2. Modulation Options. For all multifamily and mixed-use development, applicants shall select one of three options. All of the standards and requirements for building modulation shall be met. a. Option 1. The standard shall be applied only to multifamily and mixed-use buildings where:
i. Minimum density— 20 dwelling units per acre,
ii. Zone— General Neighborhood (G-N), Urban Neighborhood (U-N), and Urban Employment (UE) zones.
b. Option 2. The standard shall be applied only to multifamily and mixed-use buildings where:
i. Maximum density— less than 20 dwelling units per acre. ii. Zone— General Neighborhood (G-N) and Downtown Transition (DT-PV Transition) zones. c. Option 3. The standard shall be applied to multifamily and mixed-use buildings for:
i. All multifamily residential buildings.
ii. All multifamily and mixed-use zones.

Item 14.

3. Option 1 Standards. The standards are intended to result in buildings with complex, varied, asymmetrical form and massing.
a. Vertical Modulation. Building façade modulation shall be achieved by providing asymmetrically arranged, irregularly stepped variations in building façade height and width. The number and arrangement of façades for all buildings greater than 2 stories in height shall be modulated as identified in Figure17.20.015.7.

FIGURE 17.20.015.7
OPTION 1 STANDARDS

VERTICAL MODULATION
i. Variation— buildings 3 floors in height shall include a minimum of 2 façade heights.

Buildings 4 floors in height shall include a minimum of 3 façade heights. ii. Arrangement— The primary façade height shall comprise more than 75 percent of the total building façade. A second façade shall be provided that comprises a minimum of 20 percent of the total façade area. A third façade height shall be provided that comprises a minimum of 5 percent of the total façade area/
iii. Prohibited— façades vertically modulated with a uniform base, middle, and top utilizing projecting belt course or cornices or uniform stepping of floors.

Item 14.
b. Horizontal Modulation. Building horizontal façade modulation shall be achieved by providing a combination and variation in location, width, and depth of façade recesses and projections. For all buildings greater than 2 stories in height, façades shall be modulated horizontally as identified in Figure 17.20.015.8.

FIGURE 17.20.015.8
OPTION 1 STANDARDS

HORIZONTAL MODULATION
i. Variation— façades recesses or projections shall include a minimum of two different heights. Heights shall vary 10 feet (minimum). No more than 25 percent of any façade shall include projections or recesses that are equal in height. ii. Arrangement— A minimum of 25 percent of the total façade area shall be recessed or projected from the primary façade.
iii. Width— recesses or projections shall be a minimum of 10 feet in width. No more than 4 façade projections or recesses shall be of equal width. iv. Depth— recesses and projections shall be 4 foot or greater in depth, measured from the primary façade of the building. A minimum of 10 percent of recessed or projected façade area shall be 10 feet or greater in depth.
v. Articulation— Recessed or projecting balconies, bays, oriels, exterior walkways, stairs, and terraces shall be layered and integrated into the façade modulation as an essential component of all façade compositions.

However, projecting, or recessed balconies, bays, and oriel architectural articulation shall be excluded as part of the calculation of required recessed or projected façade modulation area.

Item 14.
c. Roof Form and Materials. Roof volume and massing shall contribute to and complement façade horizontal and vertical modulation. All buildings shall create a varied building silhouette by providing a variety of primary and secondary roof forms that are comprised of different widths, heights, and sizes as illustrated in Figure 17.20.015.9.

FIGURE 17.20.015.9
OPTION 1 STANDARDS

ROOF FORM
i. Required sloped roof forms— hipped or gabled roofs forms with a minimum slope of 3:12 and a maximum slope of 4:12 shall be required for a minimum of 60 percent of all roof area.
ii. Permitted flat roof forms— Parapet and mansard-screened flat roofs are permitted. Mansard roofs shall have a minimum 3:12 and a maximum 4:12 slope. Flat roofs with mansards or parapet wall enclosures shall not comprise more than 40 percent of total roof area. iii. Roof Materials— all sloped roofs shall consist of long-lasting, durable clay or concrete tiles.

Standing seam metal, asphalt, or wood shingle or shake roofs shall be prohibited. iv. Rooftop Amenities— rooftop private terrace or occupied outdoor common space, and stair and elevator penthouse structures shall be permitted and shall be exempt from the required flat roof area requirements.

Item 14.
d. Façade Colors. All façade surfaces shall be painted. Paint color and finish shall be muted and flat to imitate colors found naturally in desert soil, trees, rocks, and other organic materials of the Coachella Valley. Paint hues and tones shall be limited to warm white shades and rich warm colors containing some brown, ranging from neutral tan to deep brown. i. Primary color and secondary façade colors— shall be limited to a maximum of 2 paint colors.

A primary color shall comprise a minimum of 80 percent of total of all façades. A secondary color shall comprise a maximum of 20 percent of any façade fronting a public realm. ii. Windows, doors, and trim colors— limited to a maximum of 3 paint colors. Building windows shall be limited to shades of blue, black, or warm colors containing deep brown. iii. Exemptions— all approved murals or other public artwork painted on façades shall be exempt from all façade color standards.
e. Façade Materials. Façades shall be clad with durable and long-lasting materials that cannot be degraded by desert sun and high temperatures. Façades are permitted to be comprised of a single cladding material. No more than two façade materials shall be utilized for any façade. i. Primary and secondary façade materials— where 2 materials are utilized, a primary material shall clad a minimum of 80 percent of the total building façade area. A secondary material shall comprise no more than 20 percent of any public realm fronting façade. ii. Prohibited façade materials— wood siding, cementitious siding, metal panel, glazed spandrel curtain wall, un-clad poured in-place concrete or concrete masonry block, and stacked stone veneer siding, panels, or sheets.
f. Fenestration. The arrangement, location, and character of door and window openings shall provide depth, shade, and shadow and contribute to a varied façade composition. i. Arrangement— door and window locations shall be vertically and horizontally offset in an asymmetrical pattern. For façades greater than 2 floors in height, a maximum of 50 percent of any façade area shall be arranged in a vertically stacked windows and door pattern.
ii. Recess depth— No window shall be flush with any building façade. Individual or combined window and door system shall be recessed a minimum of 4 inches from the façade. The recess shall be measured from the outer face of the window glazing or door surface to the outer surface of the façade cladding.
iii. Projection depth— projecting sills, lintels, and trim shall not be required for any window or door. Where provided, sills, lintels, and trim shall project a maximum of 2 inches beyond the façade cladding surface.
vi. Shading— upper floor door and window shading is permitted. Awnings or canopies that project no more than 4 feet beyond the façade are permitted. For mixed use multifamily buildings with commercial first floor use, first floor awnings and canopies are permitted. All public realm and setback standards of this ordinance for projections shall be met.

Item 14.

4. Option 2 Standards. All Option 2 building design standards shall apply to buildings two floors or less in height. All buildings shall comply with the following standards. a. Vertical Modulation. Building vertical façade modulation shall be required. For any vertically modulated buildings greater than 1 story in height, façades shall be modulated vertically as identified in Figure 17.20.015.10.

FIGURE 71.20.015.10
OPTION 2 STANDARDS

VERTICAL MODULATION
i. Façade height variation— changes in façade height is not required for building 2 floors or less in height. Any variation in building façade height shall be asymmetrical. Where façade height variation is provided, a maximum of 80 percent of the total primary façade area shall be of a uniform height. Stepped façade height shall be a minimum of 5 feet higher or lower than the primary façade height.
ii. Vertical differentiation— buildings 2 floors or greater are not required to provide façade differentiation between lower (base) and upper (top) floors. Use of functional and/or decorative horizontal belt courses that extend the entire length of the façade is prohibited. iii. Prohibited— façades vertically modulated utilizing façade material and color changes to differentiate any portion of the base (first floor) from the top (second floor).

Item 14.
b. Horizontal Modulation. Building horizontal façade modulation shall be achieved by providing façade recesses and/or projections. For all buildings greater than 1 story in height, façades shall be articulated horizontally as identified in Figure 17.20.015.11.

FIGURE 17.20.015.11
OPTION 2 STANDARDS

VERTICAL MODULATION
i. Arrangement— a minimum of 25 percent of the total façade area shall be recessed or projected from the primary façade. Horizontal modulation variation in location, width, and depth is not required. Recessed or projecting balconies, exterior walkways, stairs, and stepback terraces shall be integrated as an essential component of all façade compositions. ii. Width— recesses or projections shall be a minimum of 10 feet in width iii. Depth— recesses and projections shall be 6 feet or greater in depth, measured from the primary façade of the building.
iv. Articulation— Recessed or projecting balconies, bays, oriels, exterior walkways, stairs, and terraces shall be layered and integrated into the façade modulation as essential components of all façade compositions.

However, projecting or recessed balconies, bays, and oriel architectural articulation shall be excluded as part of the calculation of required recessed or projected façade modulation area.

Item 14.
c. Roof Form and Materials. Roofs shall contribute to and complement façade variations in volume and massing. A variety of roof widths, heights, sizes, and forms are permitted but are not required.

No roof overhang shall project more than 1 foot beyond any building façade or balcony. Any rooftop mechanical equipment shall comply with all rooftop screening standards of this ordinance.
i. Roof forms— sloped roof forms shall comprise a minimum of 80 percent of the total roof area.

Hipped or gabled roof forms with a minimum slope of 3:12 and a maximum slope of 4:12 shall be required. A maximum of 20 percent of the total roof area shall be permitted to include flat roofs screened by mansards that have a minimum 3:12 and a maximum 4:12 roof slope.
ii. Roof Materials— all sloped roofs shall consist of long-lasting, durable clay or concrete tiles.

Standing seam metal, asphalt or wood shingle or shake roofs shall be prohibited. d. Façade Colors. All façade surfaces shall be painted. Paint color and finish shall be muted and flat to imitate colors found naturally in desert soil, trees, rocks, and other organic materials of the Coachella Valley. Paint hues and tones shall be limited to warm white shades and rich warm colors containing some brown, ranging from neutral tan to deep brown. i. Primary color and secondary façade colors— utilization of a single façade color shall be permitted. A maximum of 2 paint colors shall be permitted. A primary color shall comprise a minimum of 80 percent of total of all façades. A secondary color shall comprise a maximum of 20 percent of any façade fronting a public realm.
ii. Windows, doors, and trim colors— limited to a maximum of 3 paint colors. Building windows shall be limited to shades of blue, black, or warm colors containing deep brown. e. Façade Materials. Façades shall be clad with durable and long-lasting materials that cannot be degraded by desert sun and high temperatures. Façades are permitted to be comprised of a single cladding material. No more than two façade materials shall be utilized for any façade. i. Primary façade materials— where 2 materials are utilized, a primary material shall clad a minimum of 80 percent of the total building façade area. A secondary material shall comprise no more than 20 percent of any public realm fronting façade. ii. Permitted secondary materials include cast in place or precast concrete, decorative tiles, painted metal, treated or painted wood exposed structural beams, columns, and posts for balconies, trellises, or arcades.
iii. Prohibited façade materials— wood siding, cementitious siding, metal panel, glazed spandrel curtain wall, un-clad poured in-place concrete or concrete masonry block, stacked stone veneer siding, panels, or sheets; moulded simulated stucco (EIFS) cornices, belt, courses, door and widow trim, sills, and lintels.

Item 14.
f. Balconies. Private balconies shall be provided for a minimum of 25 percent of all residential units fronting the public realm.
i. Articulation— balconies are permitted to be recessed or projected from the building’s primary or horizontally modulated façade.
ii. Minimum depth— balconies shall project or recess a minimum of 6 feet from the building’s primary or horizontally modulated façade.
iii. Shading— balconies are permitted but not required to include a projecting roof structure above.
g. Fenestration. The building façade shall be articulated to create visual interest and provide weather protection. The arrangement, location and of character of door, window openings shall be “punched in” to provide depth, shade, and shadow.
i. Openings— a minimum of 20 percent of all façades shall include window or door openings. ii. Recess depth— no window shall be flush with any building façade. All window and door openings shall be recessed a minimum of 4 inches. The recess shall be measured from the outer face of the window or door glazing to the outer edge of the primary façade cladding surface.
iii. Projection depth— projecting sills, lintels, and trim shall not be required for any window or door. Where provided, sills, lintels, and trim shall project a maximum of 1 inch beyond the façade cladding surface.
h. Architectural Accents. Functional, structural or ornamental embellishment consistent with the architectural vernacular of the building is permitted. Architectural accents shall be used to reinforce vertical and horizontal modulation and provide visual interest to blank walls. The following design features shall be permitted to provide façade articulation and modulation:
i. Awnings and canopies— upper floor awnings or canopies are permitted over windows, doors, or balconies. Materials and colors of all canopies or awnings shall be complimentary with the overall building color palette. Interior-illuminated vinyl awnings are prohibited. Any integrated light fixture within a canopy or awning shall direct light downward toward the sidewalk or façade.

Item 14.

5. Option 3 Standards. The standards are intended to result in simple horizontally emphasized, streamlined building form, volume, and massing.
a. Vertical Modulation. Vertical modulation is not required for buildings two floors or less in height. Buildings shall be vertically modulated identified in Figure 17.20.015.12.

FIGURE 17.20.015.12
OPTION 3 STANDARDS

VERTICAL MODULATION

FOUR FLOOR BUILDINGS
i. Variation— a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 3 building heights shall be required for all building façades. For sloped sites of more than 5 percent, a maximum of 4 façade height shall be permitted.
ii. Arrangement— the primary façade shall not comprise more than 80 percent of the total façade area.
iii. Exemptions— any required stair and elevator penthouse structure, rooftop mechanical, solar array screen walls, or rooftop common area structures shall not be included in the vertical modulation calculations.

Item 14.
c. Horizontal Modulation. Building horizontal façade modulation shall be achieved by providing a uniform and consistent modulation in location, width, and depth of façade recesses and/or projections. For all buildings greater than 2 stories in height, façades shall be articulated horizontally as identified in Figure 17.20.015.13.

FIGURE 17.20.015.13
OPTION 3 STANDARDS

HORIZONTAL MODULATION
i. Variation— a minimum of 20 percent of the total façade area of buildings shall be recessed or projected from the primary façade.
ii. Width— recesses or projections shall be a minimum of 10 feet in width. iii. Depth— recesses and projections shall be a minimum of 10 feet and a maximum of 30 feet in depth, measured from the primary façade of the building. iv. Articulation— Recessed or projecting balconies shall be integrated into the façade composition. However, recessed or projected stair and elevator vertical circulation, or balconies shall not be included as part of the calculation of required recessed.

Item 14.
d. Roof Forms. Roofs shall contribute to and complement façade simple horizontal volume and massing. Stepping variation of roof height shall be minimized. i. Flat Roof Forms— all roofs shall be flat. Roofs shall permit minimal sloping to meet drainage requirements. All roofs shall have a uniform height for a minimum of 80 percent of the building area. Parapets no greater than 4 feet in height are permitted. All roofs shall overhang a minimum of 6-foot bond the building’s primary façade. ii. Accent Roof Forms— raised, angled shed, or lowered roofs shall be limited to roofs over the lobbies, stair and elevator vertical circulation, and rooftop common areas. iii. Prohibited— hipped, gable, and mansard sloped roof forms. e. Façade Colors. Façades are not required to be painted. Painted façades are permitted to be painted a single paint color. Façades painted more than one color shall comply with the following standards.
i. Primary and secondary colors— façades shall be limited to a maximum of 4 paint colors. A primary color shall be used for a minimum of 60 percent of all façades. The primary color shall be limited to warm white shades or rich, warm colors containing some brown (ranging from neutral tan to light brown). Primary paint color and finish shall be muted and flat to imitate colors found naturally in desert soil and rocks of the Coachella Valley. A secondary color(s) shall comprise a maximum of 40 percent of all façades. Secondary façades are permitted to utilize all the tints, tones, and hues of the full color spectrum. ii. Window and door colors— windows and doors shall be limited to 1 paint color. Building windows shall be limited to shades of white or black or warm colors containing deep brown. f. Façade Materials. Façades shall be clad with durable and long-lasting materials that cannot be degraded by desert sun and high temperatures. Façades are permitted to be comprised of a single cladding material. No more than 3 façade materials shall be utilized for any façade. i. Primary façade material — the primary material shall be limited to metal panel, stucco or simulated stucco (EIFS), cast in place or precast concrete, or concrete masonry block, or masonry brick materials applied to a minimum of 75% of the total façade area. ii. Secondary materials — cast in place or precast concrete, decorative tiles, stone veneer, metal panels and glazed curtain walls are permitted.
iii. Prohibited façade materials— wood siding, cementitious siding; treated or painted wood exposed structural beams, columns, and posts for balconies, or trellises; moulded simulated stucco (EIFS) door and widow trim, sills, and lintels.
g. Balconies. Balconies shall be required for all upper floor residential units. i. Articulation— balconies are permitted to be recessed or projected from the building’s primary façade.
ii. Minimum depth— balconies shall project or recess a minimum of 6 feet from the building’s primary façade.
iii. Minimum area— 60 square feet.
iv. Shading— all balconies shall be required to include a projecting roof for top floors or a balcony structure above for lower floors.

Item 14.
i. Fenestration. The building façade shall be articulated to create visual interest and provide weather protection. The arrangement, location and of character of door, window openings shall be “punched in” to provide depth, shade, and shadow. Door and window locations shall contribute to a symmetrical building form. Buildings following Option 3 shall comply with the following standards:
i. Required openings— Façades shall be comprised of a minimum of 50 percent openings for all façades fronting a public realm or common open space, excluding façades that contain stair or elevator vertical circulation.
ii. Recess depth— no window shall be flush with any building façade. All window and door openings shall be recessed a minimum of 2 inches. The recess shall be measured from the outer face of the window or door glazing to the outer edge of the primary façade cladding surface.
iii. Projection depth— projecting sills, lintels, and trim shall not be required for any window or door. Where provided, sills, lintels, and trim shall project a maximum of 1 inch beyond the façade cladding surface.

Item 14.

B. Residential Entry Standards. First floor residential entires shall be located to foster street-oriented pedestrian activity. Residential entrances of all multi-family or mixed-use buildings shall comply with the following standards.

1. Lobby Entries. Primary common entrances for tenants, guests, and interior first floor common areas and staff offices shall be located at the first floor and shall be directly accessible from the Street Type A or Street Type B public realm, usable open space common area adjacent to the public realm, or a required front yard setback.
a. At-grade Entrances. All multi-family and mixed-use zone lobby entrances shall be at-grade with the adjacent public realm sidewalk.
b. Visibility. Lobby entrances shall have direct sight lines and continuous and unobstructed pedestrian access from the public realm.
c. Prohibited Orientation. Lobby primary entries are prohibited from alleys, driveways, parking lots, or parking structures. Secondary entries are permitted from driveways, parking lots, or parking structures.

Item 14.

2. Individual Residential Unit Entries. First floor residential unit entries are permitted fronting Street Type A, Street Type B, and Street Type C, driveways, and parking lots. Individual entrances shall be accessed from the adjacent public realm, usable common open space, or required setback as specified in Figure 17.20.015.14.

FIGURE 17.20.015.14

INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL ENTRIES STANDARDS
a. Universal Access. All multi-family and mixed use building first floor individual entries shall comply with all current California Building Code minimum requirements for multi-family or mixed-use building means of egress for exterior doors.
b. Front Door Setbacks. All first-floor entrances shall be set back a minimum of 5 feet behind the public realm line.
c. Minimum Dimensions. Entry landing or stoops not including stairs, shall be a minimum of 40 square feet. Individual residential entries accessed directly from the public realm and shall have a minimum walkway, ramp, and/or stairs width of 6 feet for single unit entries. Landings or stoops shall be a minimum of 1 foot wider than the entry doorway width.

Item 14.

C. First Floor Transparency Standards. First floor commercial façades shall be designed to generate passive surveillance ‘eyes on the street’ visibility by engaging the public realm and providing transparency between the pedestrian realm and first floor uses. This standard applies only to portions of at-grade first floor façades that contain occupied commercial uses fronting the public realm. All multi-family mixed use development shall comply with the following standards as specified in Figure cccc15.

FIGURE 17.20.015.15

FIRST FLOOR TRANSPARENCY STANDARDS

1. Calculation. The first-floor façade opening area shall include the area the primary façade measured vertically between the finished floor elevation and 15 feet above the first finished floor elevation multiplied by the horizontal length of the interior occupied use. a. Openings. A minimum of 50% of first floor façades shall include transparent glazed doors and window openings.
b. Window and Door Systems. All window and door components including the frame, jamb, head, sill, mullions, muntins, and glazing shall comprise an opening. Any decorative window or door trim around the window or door frame shall not be included as part of the opening calculation.
c. Prohibited Glazing. No dark-tinted or opaque glazing for any required wall opening along first floor public realm façades is permitted. Dark-tinted and opaque windows shall be defined as having less than a minimum visible transmittance of 50 percent, including any tint, treatment, or application on glazing.
d. Exceptions. The first-floor façade opening calculation requirements does not apply to façades where perpendicular recessed or projected wall area occur; and where internal vertical stair and elevator circulation stairs and elevators, loading, and storage, or parking facilities occur.

Item 14.

STAFF REPORT
9/13/2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Andrew Simmons, P.E., City Engineer
SUBJECT: Professional Service Agreement with Heptagon Seven to develop final Plans, Specifications and Engineer’s Estimates for a Roundabout at Avenue 53 and Calle Empalme.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Authorize the City Manager to use on-call Professional Service Agreement with Heptagon Seven in an amount of $47,300 to develop final Plans, Specifications and Engineer’s Estimates (PS&E) for a Roundabout at Avenue 53 and Calle Empalme.

BACKGROUND:

There is new development on Calle Empalme and Avenue 53, Bellissima Homes, and the Tot Lot on Avenue 53 which is under design for imminent rehabilitation. Due to the anticipated increase in traffic and intersection impacts at Calle Empalme and Ave 53, City Staff is recommending a Roundabout be installed to improve community safety and traffic impacts. This will provide added safety and crossings for the Tot Lot Park, as well as, provide traffic calming for the surrounding neighborhoods.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

Staff published a request for qualifications for on-call engineering services and received 21 responses. On January 25, 2023 the City Council authorized the City Manager to qualify and execute Professional Service Agreements for on-call engineering services with eight (8) firms, including Heptagon Seven. The qualified firms were evaluated and Heptagon Seven was selected based on experience, schedule and familiarity with the area. Heptagon Seven has previous experience working on the basketball courts and is familiar with area and City standards and specifications. This will provide an expedited timeline and a high-quality set of plans.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The project will be funded from the approved on-call engineering services budget. No fiscal impact to FY 23/24 budget.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Heptagon Seven Proposal

2. Heptagon Seven PSA

Item 15.
8413 E Baseline Road
Suite 106
Mesa, AZ 85209
Phone: 760.902.9367
June 27, 2023
Mr. Gabriel Martin, Ph.D.

City Manager
City of Coachella
53990 Enterprise Way
Coachella, CA 92236
Sent Via Email
Subject: Proposal for Engineering and Landscaping Services associated with the Proposed Roundabout at Avenue 53 & Calle Empale, Coachella CA
Dear Dr. Martin:

As requested at our meeting on May 18 to discuss the Avenue 53 Tot Lot improvements, Heptagon Seven Consulting is pleased to submit our proposal for engineering and landscape architecture services associated with a proposal to install a roundabout at the intersection of Avenue 53 and Calle Empale in an attempt to reduce speeds in the area of the tot lot. From the meeting, we understand that this work will be contracted under the City’s On Call agreement.

The following is our proposed scope of services and associated fees:

SCOPE OF WORK:

TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Consultant will manage project management duties for the duration of the project to assure a costefficient, quality process. Our staff will effectively coordinate and communicate the project with City Staff and necessary agency partners from inception to final approval. Project Management activities will begin at the project initiation and will not end until construction activities have concluded. Consultant utilizes a hands-on approach to our business and thus our principal will be actively involved for the duration of the project. Under the task, Consultant will provide regular coordination with the City on the progress of the project and review all deliverables prior to submittal to the City for review.

TASK 2: TOPOGRAPHIC BASE MAP
Consultant will provide a field topographic survey to collect existing features within proposed construction areas. The collected feature shall include but are not limited to surrounding street curb and gutter, building footprint, existing utility manholes, valves and above ground structures, irrigation values, top of curb, flow line of valley gutters, walls, all above ground features / structures and other hardscape features. The Consultant will deliver a topographic base file, land base file depicting center, section and right of way lines. Following the gathering and processing of the field topographic data, Consultant will prepare a base map containing information such as parcel lines and underlying easements, if readily available through recorded maps.

TASK 3: UTILITY RESEARCH AND COORDINATION
Consultant will review existing utility data available from the City from Record Plan drawings and through requested utility plat information for the park site.

Utility Outreach. Immediately following processing of a Task Order, Consultant will prepare Utility Information Request letters to be sent to various utility companies, along with the base plans,

Item 15.

Avenue 53 Roundabout
Heptagon Seven Proposal

requesting the utility facility maps (“Atlas Maps” and Record drawings) within the project limits.

Following receipt of all utility plats, Consultant will field verify, to the extent possible, the accuracy of the existing utility base information.

Utility Base File. Based on the City and utility company provided information, Consultant will prepare a utility base file noting the approximate location of each utility facility on and adjacent to the building sites.

Utility Service Coordination. Following the concurrence on the final project scope of work by the City, Consultant will initiate design coordination activities with those utilities who prepare their own design plans (Imperial Irrigation District (IID), Gas Company, Frontier Communications and Spectrum) for new the underground services. The initiation of the agency designed facilities will be necessary to assist in determining overall project costs as well as to obtain design information on a timely basis for construction activities. Consultant will coordinate with all utility relocation/undergrounding up through the completion of contract documents and plans.

TASK 4: CONCEPT INTERSECTION PLAN
Consultant will prepare a Concept Plan for the proposed Avenue 53 at Calle Empale roundabout improvements. The plan will clearly depict the existing site conditions, property lines, easements, and required street improvements to accommodate the proposed roundabout. The Concept Plan will identify all potential conflicts, identify all utility conflicts and required improvements necessary to facilitate the proposed intersection improvements. A preliminary Opinion of Estimated Construction Costs will be prepared with the concept. Consultant will provide up to two revisions of the Concept Plan.

TASK 5: RENDERINGS
Consultant shall prepare 3D architectural renderings depicting the proposed roundabout improvements. Consultant will prepare up to three (3) rendered views for the project. In addition, Consultant will provide two revisions to the renderings for the City’s use on the approval of the project.

Consultant will use an existing site picture for the background of the rendering.

TASK 6: IMPROVEMENT PLANS
Based on the City approved Concept Plan, Consultant will prepare precise grading plan for the proposed site improvements, which will include but not be limited to one removed and replaced restroom, one new restroom facility and one new concession stand facility, and sidewalk / ADA and parking lot improvements to accommodate the proposed buildings. The plan will also contain a private utility sheet depicting the private sewer and water connections from the buildings to the water and sewer main facilities. The plan set will consist of a title sheet, removals, grading, miscellaneous details, horizontal control plan, private utility plan and striping plan (as needed). All plans will be prepared utilizing AutoCAD software and at an appropriate scale in conformance with City Standards. Plans will be submitted for City Review via an electronic submittal (PDF file) on 24x36 plan sheets.

TASK 7: LANDSCAPE PLANS
Consultant will prepare final landscape showing new plant material, irrigation, construction details and general construction specifications for incorporation into the final bid set. The landscape plans will only include improvements around the proposed restroom and concession stand buildings at the soccer fields.

Irrigation Plans: includes diagrammatic layout at 1” = 20’ of landscape irrigation piping, valves, control equipment, sprinkler heads, and related equipment for the irrigation of planted areas, specifically calling

Item 15.

Avenue 53 Roundabout
Heptagon Seven Proposal

out pipe and equipment sizing and types, brand and model. This will also include necessary details for the installation of the system, and coordination with all consultants for conflicts.

Final Landscape Plans: prepare a final landscape plan, which will include plans at a scale of 1” = 20’ indicating the location and arrangement of all plant materials.

TASK 8: COST ESTIMATE
Consultant will prepare an Engineers Estimate of Probable Construction Costs for the proposed improvements based upon the approved preliminary design plans utilizing the current edition of the Caltrans Contract Cost Data Book and recent bid information from area bids for unit costs. The construction cost estimate will be updated at each plan submittal stage including the concept plan.

TASK 9: SPECIFICATIONS
Using the City provided “Boilerplate” bid package and project specifications, Consultant shall prepare the technical specifications for each item of work in the Project not sufficiently covered by the Standard Specifications (Greenbook). The Consultant shall also prepare the bid schedule, update any utility relocation requirements for the project, review and modify the traffic control and staging for the project and determine the liquidated damages and working days for the proposed construction work.

TASK 10: BIDDING ASSISTANCE
Consultant will assist the City with the bidding and award process for this project. These services will be performed on a Time and Material (T&M) basis.

Activities associated with this task include but are not limited to:
• Bid Support. All key team members will be available to attend a pre-bid meeting. • Respond to Inquiries. Consultant will respond to bidder inquiries by phone or email. • Prepare Addenda. Consultant will prepare addenda as requested by the City. • Review/Recommended Award. Consultant will assist in recommendation for award.

For this task, Consultant assumes 6 total hours, to be billed Time and Materials at a rate of $200 / hour.

TASK 11: POST DESIGN SERVICES
Consultant will assist project staff with construction support services. Upon request from City staff the following will be provided:
• RFI documentation and response to questions regarding construction documents; • Periodic site visits during construction, as requested; • Input from the consultant regarding change orders;
• Final project review to ensure plan conformance; and
• Prepare Record Drawings based on Contractor As-Built plans.

For this task, Consultant assumes 14 total hours, to be billed Time and Materials at a rate of $200 / hour, plus an additional budget of $1,000 for the landscape architect.

Item 15.

Avenue 53 Roundabout
Heptagon Seven Proposal

PROJECT FEE
Task 1 Project Management $3,200
Task 2 Topographic Base Map $6,500
Task 3 Utility Research & Coordination $1,800
Task 4 Concept Plan $4,800
Task 5 Renderings $2,200
Task 6 Final Plans $16,300
Task 7 Landscape Plans $3,300
Task 8 Cost Estimate $1,800
Task 9 Specifications $2,400
Task 10 Bidding Assistance (T&M) $1,200
Task 11 Post Design Services (T&M) $3,800
TOTAL $47,300
Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with a proposal on this work. Please review the scope of work and fee and let me know if you have any comments or questions.

Sincerely,
Brad Donais, PE
Principal
Heptagon Seven Consulting, Inc.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

Item 15.

STAFF REPORT
9/13/2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Andrew Simmons, P.E., City Engineer
SUBJECT: Addition Work Request (AWR) #1 for Engineering and Landscape Services associated with the Avenue 53 Tot Lot.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Authorize the City Manager to execute addition work request (AWR) #1 for Engineering and Landscape Serves associated with the Avenue 53 Tot Lot in the amount of $9,900.

BACKGROUND:

In April 2022, the City requested informal proposals for the Avenue 53 Tot Lot and awarded the design to Egan Civil, Inc for the engineering and landscape design services. Topographic base mapping and survey have been completed. Egan continues to work with City Staff to provide concept plans and final designs. The added work request includes added scope of services to include a more robust and all-inclusive bid package. The AWR includes added 3D renderings, bidding services and post design services during construction.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

City Staff recommends authorizing AWR to included the 3D renderings, bidding services and post design construction support services. Egan Civil has an existing contract for the Avenue 53 Tot Lot, this AWR will allow the project to be streamlined and provide a better product.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Appropriate $9,900 from General Fund.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Egan AWR #1

2. Egan Civil Agreement

Item 16.
46150 Commerce Street,
Suite 100
Indio, CA 92201
June 27, 2023
Mr. Gabriel Martin, Ph.D.

City Manager
City of Coachella
53990 Enterprise Way
Coachella, CA 92236
Sent Via Email
Subject: Addition Work Request (AWR) #1 for Engineering and Landscaping Services associated with the Avenue 53 Tot Lot, Coachella CA
Dear Dr. Martin:

As requested at our meeting on May 18 to discuss the Avenue 53 Tot Lot improvements, the following is an AWR #1 for the additional engineering and landscape architecture services associated with the Avenue 53 tot lot, following the City’s outreach to the local community. We are pleased to provide you with the following Amended Scope and Fee revisions to our original Agreement for Engineering and Landscaping Services for the Avenue 53 Tot Lot dated April 4, 2022.

As noted at the prior mentioned meeting, based on the community outreach, the design team will redesign the full park site to provide new modern playground equipment, abundant shade and site lighting. In addition, to assist with future community outreach and City Council presentations, Consultant has added 3D renderings to our scope of work. Last of all, this AWR will include a couple of Time and Material tasks to assist the City with bidding and construction services.

The following is our proposed scope of services and associated fees for AWR #1. Note the following Task number corresponds to the original scope of services, with the additional scope noted in the task description.

SCOPE OF WORK:

TASK 2: CONCEPT PLAN ‐ UPDATED
Consultant will prepare up to two concept plans for a full renovated park site. The concept plans will show a plan view only of the proposed renovations along with pictures of any proposed playground equipment and park amenities. In addition, Consultant will prepare 3D architectural renderings depicting the proposed playground improvements. Consultant will prepare up to four (4) rendered views of the site. In addition, Consultant will provide two revisions to the renderings for the City’s use on the approval of the project. Consultant will use an existing site picture for the background of the rendering.

TASK 3: SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN ‐ UPDATED
Following City acceptance of the Concept Plan, Consultant will prepare detailed civil, site lighting and landscape improvement plans. Plans will be prepared on 24”x36” sheets, at an appropriate scale, conforming to the current City standards. Consultant will submit the improvement plans to the City for Review at 95% and 100% Mylar Screen check stages. Consultant will provide an electronic (PDF)

Item 16.

Avenue 53 Tot Lot
Egan Civil AWR#1

improvement plan submittal for City review. If requested, hard copies of the plans will be provided to the City for review purposes.

TASK 7: BIDDING ASSISTANCE
Consultant will assist the City with the bidding and award process for this project. These services will be performed on a Time and Material (T&M) basis.

Activities associated with this task include but are not limited to:
• Bid Support. All key team members will be available to attend a pre-bid meeting. • Respond to Inquiries. Consultant will respond to bidder inquiries by phone or email. • Prepare Addenda. Consultant will prepare addenda as requested by the City. • Review/Recommended Award. Consultant will assist in recommendation for award.

For this task, Consultant has provided a budget which will be invoiced on a Time and Materials at the rates noted in the following section.

TASK 8: POST DESIGN SERVICES
Consultant will assist project staff with construction support services. Upon request from City staff the following will be provided:
• RFI documentation and response to questions regarding construction documents; • Periodic site visits during construction, as requested; • Input from the consultant regarding change orders;
• Final project review to ensure plan conformance; and
• Prepare Record Drawings based on Contractor As-Built plans.

For this task, Consultant has provided a budget which will be invoiced on a Time and Materials at the rates noted in the following section.

AWR #1 FEE
Task 2 Concept Plan (Updated) $2,500
Task 3 Site Improvement Plan (Updated) $2,300
Task 9 Bidding Assistance (T&M) $1,500
Task 8 Post Design Services (T&M) $3,600
TOTAL $9,900
Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with a proposal on this work. Please review the scope of work and fee and let me know if you have any comments or questions.

Respectfully submitted,
Benjamin Egan, PE, PLS
Principal
Egan Civil, Inc.

Item 16.

Item 16.

Item 16.

Item 16.

Item 16.

Item 16.

Item 16.

CURRENT BALANCE AS OF NET: DEPOSITS/ INTEREST EARNED / PAYMENT OF PAYMENT OF BALANCE AS OF YIELD 4/30/2023 (WITHDRAWALS) CHANGE IN VALUE (INTEREST) (PRINCIPAL) 5/31/2023

CASH ON HAND
Wells Fargo-General Checking N/A 6,835,201.51 8,486,344.35 - - - 15,321,545.86 Wells Fargo-Road Maintenance N/A 1,827,450.05 69,073.51 - - 1,896,523.56 Wells Fargo-Gas Tax N/A 1,262,298.22 63,660.88 - - - 1,325,959.10 Wells Fargo- Payroll Acct N/A (24.12) (690.32) (714.44) Petty Cash N/A 6,000.00 - - - - 6,000.00
Total Cash on Hand 9,930,925.66 8,618,388.42 - - - 18,549,314.08

INVESTMENTS
State of California - LAIF 2.17% 18,217,341.86 - - - 18,217,341.86 Investment Management Acct 1.47% 33,673,488.78 (127,358.39) - - 33,546,130.39 Total Investments 51,890,830.64 (127,358.39) - - - 51,763,472.25

CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT
US Bank varies 2,187,119.36 454,182.36 180.55 - - 4,658,557.05 ① Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 5.83% 197.29 273,500.00 0.71 - - 273,698.00 ② Wilmington Trust, N. A. 0.03% 1,178,341.71 0.01 4,702.86 - - 1,183,044.58 ③ Total Cash with Fiscal Agent 3,365,658.36 727,682.37 4,884.12 - - 6,115,299.63 Grand Total 65,187,414.66 9,218,712.40 4,884.12 - - 76,428,085.96 Completed By:

Reviewed By: William Pattison-Interim Finance Director

CITY OF COACHELLA

TREASURER'S REPORT - INVESTMENT REPORT
As of May 31, 2023
Fiscal Year 2022-2023

DESCRIPTION
Lourdes Marrón-Accountant

Item 17.

CURRENT BALANCE AS OF NET: DEPOSITS/ INTEREST EARNED / PAYMENT OF PAYMENT OF BALANCE AS OF YIELD 4/30/2023 (WITHDRAWALS) CHANGE IN VALUE (INTEREST) (PRINCIPAL) 5/31/2023

CITY OF COACHELLA

TREASURER'S REPORT - INVESTMENT REPORT
As of May 31, 2023
Fiscal Year 2022-2023

DESCRIPTION

CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT

US BANK

COACHELLA FINANCING AUTHORITY
Successor Agency to the Coachella Redevelopments Agency 2014 Series A/C #: 6712104701 Debt Service Fund 0.00% 768.50 - 2.97 - - 771.47 A/C #: 6712104702 Interest Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 6712104703 Principal Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 6712104703 Reserve Account 0.00% 827,612.50 - - - - 827,612.50

COACHELLA SANITARY DISTRICT
WASTEWATER SERIES 2015A
A/C #: 6712148601 Bond Fund 0.00% 1,119.88 63.29 3.96 - - 1,187.13 A/C #: 6712148602 Interest Account 0.00% - (15.64) 15.64 - - - A/C #: 6712148603 Principal Account 0.00% - (47.65) 47.65 - - - A/C #: 6712148604 Reserve Account 0.00% 310,175.00 - - - - 310,175.00 COACHELLA SANITARY DISTRICT: PROJECT FUND 2011
A/C #: 6711963500 Project Fund 2011 0.0100% 25,927.29 - 100.03 - - 26,027.32

Item 17.

CURRENT BALANCE AS OF NET: DEPOSITS/ INTEREST EARNED / PAYMENT OF PAYMENT OF BALANCE AS OF YIELD 4/30/2023 (WITHDRAWALS) CHANGE IN VALUE (INTEREST) (PRINCIPAL) 5/31/2023

CITY OF COACHELLA

TREASURER'S REPORT - INVESTMENT REPORT
As of May 31, 2023
Fiscal Year 2022-2023

DESCRIPTION

COACHELLA SUCCESSOR AGENCY
MERGED PROJECT AREAS BONDS 98 & 99: BONDS 2013

0.00% 234.49 - 0.90 - - 235.39

0.00% (0.00) - - - - (0.00)

0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 6712071401 Interest Account
A/C #: 6712071402 Interest Account
A/C #: 6712071403 Principal Account
A/C #: 6712071404 Reserve Account 0.00% 406,487.50 - - - - 406,487.50 SA TO COACHELLA RDA REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 2016A & 2016B A/C #: 6712160601 Debt Service 0.00% 1,979.67 - 7.64 - - 1,987.31 A/C #: 6712160602 Interest Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 6712160603 Principal Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 6712160604 Reserve Account 0.00% 2,017,074.78 - - - - 2,017,074.78 COACHELLA LEASE BONDS 2016
A/C #: 6712179801 Payment Account 0.0000% 483.27 454,182.36 1.76 - - 454,667.39 A/C #: 6712179802 Interest Account 0.0000% (0.00) - - - - (0.00) A/C #: 6712179803 Principal Account 0.0000% - - - - - - A/C #: 6712179804 Reerve Account 0.0000% 612,331.26 - - 612,331.26 TOTAL US BANK OF CALIFORNIA 4,204,194.14 454,182.36 180.55 - - 4,658,557.05 ①

Item 17.

CURRENT BALANCE AS OF NET: DEPOSITS/ INTEREST EARNED / PAYMENT OF PAYMENT OF BALANCE AS OF YIELD 4/30/2023 (WITHDRAWALS) CHANGE IN VALUE (INTEREST) (PRINCIPAL) 5/31/2023

CITY OF COACHELLA

TREASURER'S REPORT - INVESTMENT REPORT
As of May 31, 2023
Fiscal Year 2022-2023

DESCRIPTION
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

GAS TAX BONDS SERIES 2019
A/C #: 83925300 Debt Service Fund 0.0000% 171.68 273,500.00 0.62 - - 273,672.30 A/C #: 83925301 Interest Account 0.0000% 7.65 0.03 - - 7.68 A/C #: 83925302 Principal Account 0.0000% 17.96 - 0.06 - - 18.02 TOTAL WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 197.29 273,500.00 0.71 - - 273,698.00 ② WILMINGTON TRUST, N. A.

CITY OF COACHELLA TAXABLE PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS
A/C #: 144613-000 Revenue Account 0.03% 665.04 - 2.76 - 667.80 A/C #: 144613-001 Interest Account 0.03% 103.38 0.01 0.30 - 103.69 A/C #: 144613-002 Principal Account 0.00% - - - - - -
CITY OF COACHELLA 2022A BOND FUND
A/C #: 154278-000 Bond Fund 1.76% 15,534.52 4,259.68 78.50 - - 19,872.70 A/C #: 154278-001 Interest Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 154278-002 Principal Account 0.00% - - - -
A/C #: 154278-004 Project FD Account 1.76% 1,162,378.05 (4,259.68) 4,622.82 1,162,741.19 CITY OF COACHELLA 2022B BOND FUND
A/C #: 155657-000 Bond Fund 1.76% 325.76 - 1.24 - - 327.00 A/C #: 155657-001 Interest Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 155657-002 Principal Account 0.00% - - - -
A/C #: 155657-004 COI Account 0.00% - - - - - -
TOTAL WILMINGTGON TRUST BANK, N.A. 1,178,341.71 0.01 4,702.86 - - 1,183,044.58 ③ TOTAL CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT 5,382,733.14 727,682.37 4,884.12 - - 6,115,299.63

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2018 2.625% 12/31/2023
9128285U0 70,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/30/19 01/31/19 70,207.81 2.56 771.55 70,024.66 68,917.18

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/01/2017 2.000% 04/30/2024
912828X70 350,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/03/19 06/05/19 351,585.94 1.90 608.70 350,295.76 339,718.75

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2022 2.500% 05/31/2024
91282CER8 1,250,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/05/22 07/07/22 1,242,626.95 2.82 85.38 1,246,122.24 1,216,796.88

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/15/2021 0.375% 07/15/2024
91282CCL3 1,285,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/17/22 02/18/22 1,248,206.84 1.59 1,823.67 1,267,818.68 1,219,946.88

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2017 2.125% 07/31/2024
9128282N9 125,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/01/19 08/05/19 126,933.59 1.80 887.86 125,452.09 120,859.38

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2017 1.875% 08/31/2024
9128282U3 165,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/03/19 09/05/19 169,299.02 1.33 781.84 166,078.29 158,812.50

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024
9128282Y5 295,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/01/19 10/03/19 303,815.43 1.50 1,061.92 297,353.68 284,490.63

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2019 1.500% 10/31/2024
912828YM6 195,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/11/21 01/12/21 203,630.27 0.33 254.35 198,220.81 186,194.54

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2017 2.125% 11/30/2024
9128283J7 425,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/03/20 01/07/20 434,844.73 1.63 24.68 428,015.60 408,929.69

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2017 2.125% 11/30/2024
9128283J7 580,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/02/19 12/04/19 591,917.19 1.69 33.67 583,582.35 558,068.75

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 01/15/2022 1.125% 01/15/2025
91282CDS7 1,265,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/17/22 02/18/22 1,244,888.48 1.69 5,385.86 1,253,751.18 1,195,029.69

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/17/2015 2.000% 02/15/2025
912828J27 130,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/02/20 03/04/20 137,205.86 0.85 761.33 132,489.59 124,454.69

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025
912828ZF0 1,330,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/05/22 07/07/22 1,248,953.13 2.83 1,126.50 1,275,670.99 1,237,107.75

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2020 0.250% 08/31/2025
91282CAJ0 555,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/02/21 08/06/21 548,799.61 0.53 350.65 551,570.17 507,478.13

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2020 0.250% 08/31/2025
91282CAJ0 1,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/06/22 07/07/22 1,381,816.41 2.89 947.69 1,415,597.82 1,371,562.50

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 09/30/2020 0.250% 09/30/2025
91282CAM3 460,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/07/21 09/09/21 452,273.44 0.67 194.81 455,558.01 420,037.50

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2020 0.250% 10/31/2025
91282CAT8 350,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/01/22 03/01/22 333,361.33 1.59 76.09 339,035.86 318,500.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2020 0.250% 10/31/2025
91282CAT8 410,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/04/21 10/06/21 401,319.53 0.78 89.13 404,841.95 373,100.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2020 0.375% 11/30/2025
91282CAZ4 210,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/02/21 11/03/21 204,659.77 1.01 2.15 206,723.37 191,231.25

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 190,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/05/21 04/07/21 185,494.92 0.89 299.17 187,540.31 172,781.25

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 350,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/11/21 01/12/21 347,867.19 0.50 551.11 348,890.09 318,281.25

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 160,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/03/22 05/04/22 145,500.00 2.95 200.55 149,665.57 145,024.99

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2019 2.625% 01/31/2026
9128286A3 255,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/04/21 02/08/21 282,063.87 0.47 2,237.41 269,514.45 245,357.81

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 270,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/26/21 02/26/21 264,410.16 0.80 338.43 266,972.17 244,729.67

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 475,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/02/21 07/07/21 465,871.09 0.80 595.39 469,667.05 430,542.95

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 1,320,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/17/22 02/18/22 1,246,626.56 1.84 1,654.56 1,270,423.35 1,196,456.19

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
91282CBQ3 310,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/05/21 03/09/21 305,676.95 0.79 391.71 307,613.64 281,228.13

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
91282CBQ3 630,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/03/21 12/07/21 613,019.53 1.15 796.06 618,969.29 571,528.12

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 290,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/02/21 06/04/21 289,365.62 0.79 5.94 289,618.75 263,265.63

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 325,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/06/22 06/08/22 297,857.42 2.99 6.66 304,544.99 295,039.06

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
91282CCZ2 300,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/05/22 04/07/22 276,222.66 2.77 444.67 282,323.14 271,359.36

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
912828V98 295,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/05/22 07/07/22 287,371.48 2.85 1,943.58 288,861.85 277,991.42

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
912828V98 925,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/14/22 09/15/22 871,451.17 3.68 6,094.27 880,044.20 871,668.02

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2020 0.500% 04/30/2027
912828ZN3 1,110,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/03/22 08/05/22 992,062.50 2.92 482.61 1,012,525.92 973,851.62

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/15/2017 2.250% 08/15/2027
9128282R0 1,050,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/01/22 09/06/22 995,490.23 3.40 6,917.82 1,003,588.13 984,375.00

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
91282CFM8 500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/01/22 11/03/22 496,738.28 4.27 3,493.85 497,120.51 504,921.90

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 10/31/2022 4.125% 10/31/2027
91282CFU0 340,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/06/22 12/08/22 344,728.13 3.81 1,219.57 344,265.37 343,506.25

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
91282CAU5 1,210,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/04/23 01/06/23 1,030,437.89 3.91 526.09 1,045,341.85 1,046,271.88

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
91282CBJ9 1,130,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/07/23 02/08/23 973,962.89 3.82 2,832.80 983,661.57 982,923.49

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2028
91282CGT2 490,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/01/23 05/02/23 489,502.34 3.65 3,008.95 489,510.66 486,325.00

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
91282CBS9 575,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/08/23 05/09/23 517,095.70 3.51 1,217.55 517,840.55 510,402.32

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028
91282CHA2 420,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/01/23 05/01/23 418,047.66 3.60 1,278.26 418,080.80 414,618.75

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028
91282CHA2 460,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/15/23 05/16/23 460,844.53 3.46 1,400.00 460,837.07 454,106.25 Security Type Sub-Total 24,330,000.00 23,294,054.10 2.40 53,204.84 23,475,624.38 22,587,793.00 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note

INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023
459058JM6 150,000.00 AAA Aaa 11/17/20 11/24/20 149,677.50 0.32 7.29 149,948.16 146,343.00

INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES
DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024
4581X0DZ8 300,000.00 AAA Aaa 09/15/21 09/23/21 299,778.00 0.52 283.33 299,902.77 283,542.60 Security Type Sub-Total 450,000.00 449,455.50 0.46 290.62 449,850.93 429,885.60 Municipal Bond / Note

CA ST TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 10/24/2019 2.400% 10/01/2023
13063DRJ9 190,000.00 AA- Aa2 10/16/19 10/24/19 193,801.90 1.87 760.00 190,322.55 188,538.90

MS ST TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 08/06/2020 0.565% 11/01/2024
605581MZ7 200,000.00 AA Aa2 07/24/20 08/06/20 200,000.00 0.57 94.17 200,000.00 187,224.00

OR ST DEPT TRANS TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 09/17/2020 0.566% 11/15/2024
68607DVA0 135,000.00 AAA Aa1 09/11/20 09/17/20 135,000.00 0.57 33.96 135,000.00 126,733.95

FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
341271AD6 40,000.00 AA Aa3 09/03/20 09/16/20 40,282.80 1.11 209.67 40,123.05 36,984.80

FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
341271AD6 110,000.00 AA Aa3 09/03/20 09/16/20 110,000.00 1.26 576.58 110,000.00 101,708.20

LOS ANGELES CCD, CA TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 11/10/2020 0.773% 08/01/2025
54438CYK2 80,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/30/20 11/10/20 80,000.00 0.77 206.13 80,000.00 73,654.40

NJ TURNPIKE AUTHORITY TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 02/04/2021 1.047% 01/01/2026
646140DP5 40,000.00 AA- A1 01/22/21 02/04/21 40,000.00 1.05 174.50 40,000.00 36,428.40 Security Type Sub-Total 795,000.00 799,084.70 1.06 2,055.01 795,445.60 751,272.65

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security

FANNIEMAE-ACES
DTD 04/01/2014 3.346% 03/01/2024
3136AJB54 55,096.55 AA+ Aaa 12/13/19 12/18/19 57,773.91 2.14 153.63 55,574.46 54,642.33 FHMS K043 A2
DTD 03/01/2015 3.062% 12/01/2024
3137BGK24 110,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/19/20 03/25/20 115,448.44 1.95 280.68 111,747.19 106,881.41 FHMS K061 A2
DTD 01/30/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026
3137BTUM1 240,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/19/23 05/24/23 232,612.50 4.31 669.40 232,659.52 232,093.26 Security Type Sub-Total 405,096.55 405,834.85 3.37 1,103.71 399,981.17 393,617.00 Federal Agency Bond / Note

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/21/2020 0.250% 09/21/2023
3133EMAM4 250,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/07/20 10/09/20 249,575.00 0.31 121.53 249,955.80 246,094.50

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS NOTES
DTD 12/09/2013 3.375% 12/08/2023
3130A0F70 190,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/30/19 01/31/19 195,600.04 2.72 3,081.56 190,600.46 188,038.44

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK NOTES
DTD 04/16/2020 0.500% 04/14/2025
3130AJHU6 200,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/15/20 04/16/20 199,008.00 0.60 130.56 199,628.54 185,677.20

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 260,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/22/20 04/24/20 259,464.40 0.67 176.04 259,797.09 241,795.32

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 360,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/03/20 06/05/20 361,843.20 0.52 243.75 360,714.73 334,793.52

FREDDIE MAC NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/29/2020 0.750% 05/28/2025
3134GVB31 200,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/05/20 06/09/20 199,400.00 0.81 12.50 199,759.54 185,124.60

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 175,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/02/20 07/07/20 175,201.25 0.48 398.61 175,083.24 161,540.75

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 225,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/01/20 10/05/20 226,055.25 0.40 512.50 225,459.37 207,695.25

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 305,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/17/20 06/19/20 304,368.65 0.54 694.72 304,741.44 281,542.45

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 07/23/2020 0.375% 07/21/2025
3137EAEU9 185,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/21/20 07/23/20 184,078.70 0.48 250.52 184,605.52 169,854.98

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Federal Agency Bond / Note

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
3135G05X7 195,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/25/20 08/27/20 194,087.40 0.47 195.00 194,591.73 178,442.94

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
3135G05X7 420,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/21/20 10/22/20 417,727.80 0.49 420.00 418,951.29 384,338.64

FREDDIE MAC NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/30/2022 4.050% 08/28/2025
3134GXS54 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/19/22 08/30/22 999,600.00 4.06 10,352.53 999,700.55 978,387.00

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
3137EAEX3 285,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/23/20 09/25/20 284,142.15 0.44 201.88 284,602.59 260,176.22

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
3135G06G3 185,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/09/20 11/12/20 184,337.70 0.57 61.67 184,676.31 168,906.30 Security Type Sub-Total 4,435,000.00 4,434,489.54 1.45 16,853.37 4,432,868.20 4,172,408.11 Corporate Note

PFIZER INC CORP NOTES
DTD 03/11/2019 2.950% 03/15/2024
717081ES8 260,000.00 A+ A1 04/02/19 04/04/19 263,146.00 2.69 1,619.22 260,458.28 255,485.36 AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024
023135BW5 115,000.00 AA A1 05/10/21 05/12/21 114,832.10 0.50 27.31 114,947.00 109,837.77

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC CORP NOTES
(CALLAB
DTD 05/04/2017 2.625% 05/15/2024
882508BB9 300,000.00 A+ Aa3 02/23/22 02/25/22 304,716.00 1.90 350.00 301,813.36 292,425.90

WALMART INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 04/23/2019 2.850% 07/08/2024
931142EL3 360,000.00 AA Aa2 07/10/19 07/12/19 371,235.60 2.19 4,075.50 362,337.36 351,932.40

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORPORATE

NOTES (CAL
DTD 09/16/2020 0.653% 09/16/2024
46647PBS4 115,000.00 A- A1 09/09/20 09/16/20 115,000.00 0.65 156.45 115,000.00 113,368.96

BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)

CORPORAT
DTD 10/21/2020 0.810% 10/24/2024
06051GJH3 150,000.00 A- A1 10/16/20 10/21/20 150,000.00 0.81 124.88 150,000.00 147,054.15

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Corporate Note

JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 01/10/2022 1.250% 01/10/2025
24422EVY2 190,000.00 A A2 03/08/22 03/10/22 185,200.60 2.17 930.21 187,274.01 179,465.83

MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) NOTES
DTD 02/12/2015 2.700% 02/12/2025
594918BB9 190,000.00 AAA Aaa 03/15/21 03/17/21 202,921.90 0.92 1,553.25 195,126.20 184,374.86

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORP
NOTES
DTD 02/13/2020 1.800% 02/13/2025
89236TGT6 60,000.00 A+ A1 05/20/20 05/26/20 60,586.20 1.58 324.00 60,211.83 57,041.22

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORP
NOTES
DTD 02/13/2020 1.800% 02/13/2025
89236TGT6 90,000.00 A+ A1 05/20/20 05/26/20 90,879.30 1.58 486.00 90,317.75 85,561.83

NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP
DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025
66989HAP3 295,000.00 AA- A1 05/06/20 05/08/20 305,504.95 0.98 1,534.41 298,638.69 280,893.40 AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 04/13/2022 3.000% 04/13/2025
023135CE4 245,000.00 AA A1 04/11/22 04/13/22 244,610.45 3.06 980.00 244,757.60 238,294.11

CITIGROUP INC (CALLABLE) CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 05/04/2021 0.981% 05/01/2025
172967MX6 50,000.00 BBB+ A3 04/27/21 05/04/21 50,000.00 0.98 40.88 50,000.00 47,750.50

CITIGROUP INC (CALLABLE) CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 05/04/2021 0.981% 05/01/2025
172967MX6 55,000.00 BBB+ A3 04/28/21 05/04/21 55,145.75 0.91 44.96 55,044.67 52,525.55

GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 05/22/2015 3.750% 05/22/2025
38148LAE6 135,000.00 BBB+ A2 02/12/21 02/17/21 150,819.30 0.94 126.56 141,819.78 130,925.30

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE) CORP
NOTE
DTD 06/01/2021 0.824% 06/01/2025
46647PCH7 115,000.00 A- A1 05/24/21 06/01/21 115,000.00 0.82 473.80 115,000.00 109,299.11

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE
DTD 08/10/2021 0.768% 08/09/2025
46647PCM6 50,000.00 A- A1 08/03/21 08/10/21 50,000.00 0.77 119.47 50,000.00 47,062.95

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Corporate Note

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 11/13/2020 0.750% 11/13/2025
110122DN5 72,000.00 A+ A2 06/17/21 06/21/21 71,282.88 0.98 27.00 71,599.91 65,821.46

BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/22/2022 3.384% 04/02/2026
06051GKM0 220,000.00 A- A1 03/17/22 03/22/22 220,000.00 3.38 1,220.12 220,000.00 211,469.72

TARGET CORP CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
87612EBM7 25,000.00 A A2 01/19/22 01/24/22 24,957.50 1.99 184.17 24,969.03 22,996.00

TARGET CORP CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
87612EBM7 125,000.00 A A2 01/27/22 01/31/22 124,923.75 1.96 920.83 124,944.22 114,980.00

BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPOR
DTD 01/26/2022 2.050% 01/26/2027
06406RBA4 200,000.00 A A1 01/26/22 01/28/22 200,644.00 1.98 1,423.61 200,468.36 180,864.60

BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPOR
DTD 01/26/2022 2.050% 01/26/2027
06406RBA4 300,000.00 A A1 08/02/22 08/04/22 280,158.00 3.67 2,135.42 283,808.64 271,296.90

ADOBE INC (CALLABLE) CORP NOTE
DTD 02/03/2020 2.150% 02/01/2027
00724PAC3 360,000.00 A+ A2 12/13/22 12/15/22 332,316.00 4.20 2,580.00 335,398.12 331,804.44

JPMORGAN CHASE CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2021 1.578% 04/22/2027
46647PCB0 260,000.00 A- A1 08/02/22 08/04/22 235,172.60 3.81 444.47 239,512.35 232,674.52

HOME DEPOT INC CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/14/2017 2.800% 09/14/2027
437076BT8 350,000.00 A A2 01/25/23 01/27/23 330,256.50 4.15 2,096.11 331,715.95 328,181.00 Security Type Sub-Total 4,687,000.00 4,649,309.38 2.35 23,998.63 4,625,163.11 4,443,387.84 Certificate of Deposit

TORONTO DOMINION BANK NY CERT
DEPOS
DTD 10/31/2022 5.470% 10/25/2024
89115B6F2 325,000.00 A A1 10/27/22 10/31/22 325,000.00 5.44 10,518.35 325,000.00 324,772.50 Security Type Sub-Total 325,000.00 325,000.00 5.44 10,518.35 325,000.00 324,772.50

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending May 31, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Asset-Backed Security
HAROT 2020-1 A3
DTD 02/26/2020 1.610% 04/22/2024
43813RAC1 4,662.11 NR Aaa 02/19/20 02/26/20 4,661.20 1.61 2.08 4,661.91 4,652.82 TAOT 2020-A A3
DTD 02/12/2020 1.660% 05/15/2024
89232HAC9 457.90 AAA Aaa 02/04/20 02/12/20 457.87 1.66 0.34 457.89 457.25 CARMX 2020-1 A3
DTD 01/22/2020 1.890% 12/16/2024
14315XAC2 14,444.46 AAA NR 01/14/20 01/22/20 14,441.62 1.89 12.13 14,443.57 14,349.61 HAROT 2021-1 A3
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
43813GAC5 24,865.01 NR Aaa 02/17/21 02/24/21 24,864.55 0.27 1.86 24,864.80 24,210.43 HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
44933LAC7 29,127.57 AAA NR 04/20/21 04/28/21 29,124.51 0.38 4.92 29,125.97 28,276.48 CARMX 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
14316NAC3 16,010.03 AAA NR 01/20/21 01/27/21 16,006.86 0.34 2.42 16,008.38 15,469.81 TAOT 2021-C A3
DTD 09/27/2021 0.430% 01/15/2026
89239BAC5 68,286.55 AAA Aaa 09/21/21 09/27/21 68,281.11 0.43 13.05 68,283.23 65,476.07 CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
14314QAC8 46,169.81 AAA NR 04/13/21 04/21/21 46,159.86 0.52 10.67 46,164.21 44,528.61 HART 2021-C A3
DTD 11/17/2021 0.740% 05/15/2026
44935FAD6 35,000.00 AAA NR 11/09/21 11/17/21 34,992.19 0.75 11.51 34,994.86 33,513.87 DCENT 2021-A1 A1
DTD 09/27/2021 0.580% 09/15/2026
254683CP8 55,000.00 AAA Aaa 09/20/21 09/27/21 54,988.22 0.58 14.18 54,992.19 51,741.73 Security Type Sub-Total 294,023.44 293,977.99 0.58 73.16 293,997.01 282,676.68 Managed Account Sub-Total 35,721,119.99 34,651,206.06 2.25 108,097.69 34,797,930.40 33,385,813.38 $35,721,119.99 $34,651,206.06 2.25% $108,097.69 $34,797,930.40 $33,385,813.38 $33,493,911.07
$108,097.69
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total

Item 17.

CURRENT BALANCE AS OF NET: DEPOSITS/ INTEREST EARNED / PAYMENT OF PAYMENT OF BALANCE AS OF YIELD 5/31/2023 (WITHDRAWALS) CHANGE IN VALUE (INTEREST) (PRINCIPAL) 6/30/2023

CASH ON HAND
Wells Fargo-General Checking N/A 15,321,545.86 (9,272,883.69) - - - 6,048,662.17 Sweep Account 4.966% - 12,501,228.85 12,501,228.85
Wells Fargo-Road Maintenance N/A 1,896,523.56 (1,890,054.20) - - 6,469.36 Wells Fargo-Gas Tax N/A 1,325,959.10 (1,008,534.90) - - - 317,424.20 Wells Fargo- Payroll Acct N/A (714.44) (15,855.16) (16,569.60) Petty Cash N/A 6,000.00 - - - - 6,000.00
Total Cash on Hand 18,549,314.08 313,900.90 - - - 18,863,214.98

INVESTMENTS
State of California - LAIF 2.17% 18,217,341.86 - - - 18,217,341.86 Investment Management Acct 1.47% 33,546,130.39 (238,986.63) - - 33,307,143.76 Total Investments 51,763,472.25 (238,986.63) - - - 51,524,485.62

CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT
US Bank varies 4,658,557.05 - 716.44 (154,665.63) (300,000.00) 4,204,607.86 ① Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 5.83% 273,698.00 - 244.53 (83,500.00) (190,000.00) 442.53 ② Wilmington Trust, N. A. 0.03% 1,183,044.58 1,241,000.71 4,769.72 - - 2,428,815.01 ③ Total Cash with Fiscal Agent 6,115,299.63 1,241,000.71 5,730.69 (238,165.63) (490,000.00) 6,633,865.40 Grand Total 76,428,085.96 1,315,914.98 5,730.69 (238,165.63) (490,000.00) 77,021,566.00 Completed By:

Reviewed By: William Pattison-Interim Finance Director

CITY OF COACHELLA

TREASURER'S REPORT - INVESTMENT REPORT
As of June 30, 2023
Fiscal Year 2022-2023

DESCRIPTION
Lourdes Marrón-Accountant

Item 17.

CURRENT BALANCE AS OF NET: DEPOSITS/ INTEREST EARNED / PAYMENT OF PAYMENT OF BALANCE AS OF YIELD 5/31/2023 (WITHDRAWALS) CHANGE IN VALUE (INTEREST) (PRINCIPAL) 6/30/2023

CITY OF COACHELLA

TREASURER'S REPORT - INVESTMENT REPORT
As of June 30, 2023
Fiscal Year 2022-2023

DESCRIPTION

CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT

US BANK

COACHELLA FINANCING AUTHORITY
Successor Agency to the Coachella Redevelopments Agency 2014 Series A/C #: 6712104701 Debt Service Fund 0.00% 771.47 - 3.24 - - 774.71 A/C #: 6712104702 Interest Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 6712104703 Principal Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 6712104704 Reserve Account 0.00% 827,612.50 - - - - 827,612.50

COACHELLA SANITARY DISTRICT
WASTEWATER SERIES 2015A
A/C #: 6712148601 Bond Fund 0.00% 1,187.13 0.01 4.96 - - 1,192.10 A/C #: 6712148602 Interest Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 6712148603 Principal Account 0.00% - (0.01) 0.01 - - - A/C #: 6712148604 Reserve Account 0.00% 310,175.00 - - - - 310,175.00 COACHELLA SANITARY DISTRICT: PROJECT FUND 2011
A/C #: 6711963500 Project Fund 2011 0.0100% 26,027.32 - 109.33 - - 26,136.65

Item 17.

CURRENT BALANCE AS OF NET: DEPOSITS/ INTEREST EARNED / PAYMENT OF PAYMENT OF BALANCE AS OF YIELD 5/31/2023 (WITHDRAWALS) CHANGE IN VALUE (INTEREST) (PRINCIPAL) 6/30/2023

CITY OF COACHELLA

TREASURER'S REPORT - INVESTMENT REPORT
As of June 30, 2023
Fiscal Year 2022-2023

DESCRIPTION

COACHELLA SUCCESSOR AGENCY
MERGED PROJECT AREAS BONDS 98 & 99: BONDS 2013
A/C #: 6712071401 Interest Account 0.00% 235.39 - 0.99 - - 236.38 A/C #: 6712071402 Interest Account 0.00% (0.00) - - - - (0.00) A/C #: 6712071403 Principal Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 6712071404 Reserve Account 0.00% 406,487.50 - - - - 406,487.50 SA TO COACHELLA RDA REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 2016A & 2016B A/C #: 6712160601 Debt Service 0.00% 1,987.31 - 8.35 - - 1,995.66 A/C #: 6712160602 Interest Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 6712160603 Principal Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 6712160604 Reserve Account 0.00% 2,017,074.78 - - - - 2,017,074.78 COACHELLA LEASE BONDS 2016
A/C #: 6712179801 Payment Account 0.0000% 454,667.39 (454,665.63) 589.56 - - 591.32 A/C #: 6712179802 Interest Account 0.0000% (0.00) 154,665.63 - (154,665.63) - (0.00) A/C #: 6712179803 Principal Account 0.0000% - 300,000.00 - - (300,000.00) - A/C #: 6712179804 Reserve Account 0.0000% 612,331.26 - - - - 612,331.26 TOTAL US BANK OF CALIFORNIA 4,658,557.05 - 716.44 (154,665.63) (300,000.00) 4,204,607.86 ①

Item 17.

CURRENT BALANCE AS OF NET: DEPOSITS/ INTEREST EARNED / PAYMENT OF PAYMENT OF BALANCE AS OF YIELD 5/31/2023 (WITHDRAWALS) CHANGE IN VALUE (INTEREST) (PRINCIPAL) 6/30/2023

CITY OF COACHELLA

TREASURER'S REPORT - INVESTMENT REPORT
As of June 30, 2023
Fiscal Year 2022-2023

DESCRIPTION
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

GAS TAX BONDS SERIES 2019
A/C #: 83925300 Debt Service Fund 0.0000% 273,672.30 (273,500.00) 244.43 - - 416.73 A/C #: 83925301 Interest Account 0.0000% 7.68 83,500.00 0.03 (83,500.00) - 7.71 A/C #: 83925302 Principal Account 0.0000% 18.02 190,000.00 0.07 - (190,000.00) 18.09 TOTAL WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 273,698.00 - 244.53 (83,500.00) (190,000.00) 442.53 ② WILMINGTON TRUST, N. A.

CITY OF COACHELLA TAXABLE PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS
A/C #: 144613-000 Revenue Account 0.03% 667.80 (665.04) 2,591.08 - - 2,593.84 A/C #: 144613-001 Interest Account 0.03% 103.69 191,000.71 25.59 - - 191,129.99 A/C #: 144613-002 Principal Account 0.00% - 1,050,000.00 137.28 - - 1,050,137.28 CITY OF COACHELLA 2022A BOND FUND
A/C #: 154278-000 Bond Fund 1.76% 19,872.70 4,622.82 94.77 - - 24,590.29 A/C #: 154278-001 Interest Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 154278-002 Principal Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 154278-004 Project FD Account 1.76% 1,162,741.19 (4,622.82) 4,509.06 - - 1,162,627.43 CITY OF COACHELLA 2022B BOND FUND
A/C #: 155657-000 Bond Fund 1.76% 327.00 - 3.02 - - 330.02 A/C #: 155657-001 Interest Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 155657-002 Principal Account 0.00% - - - - - -
A/C #: 155657-004 COI Account 0.00% - - - - - -
TOTAL WILMINGTGON TRUST BANK, N.A. 1,183,044.58 1,241,000.71 4,769.72 - - 2,428,815.01 ③ TOTAL CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT 6,115,299.63 1,241,000.71 5,730.69 (238,165.63) (490,000.00) 6,633,865.40

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2018 2.625% 12/31/2023
9128285U0 70,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/30/19 01/31/19 70,207.81 2.56 4.99 70,021.19 69,081.25

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 05/01/2017 2.000% 04/30/2024
912828X70 350,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/03/19 06/05/19 351,585.94 1.90 1,179.35 350,269.19 340,210.92

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2022 2.500% 05/31/2024
91282CER8 650,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/05/22 07/07/22 646,166.01 2.82 1,376.37 648,149.30 633,039.03

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 07/15/2021 0.375% 07/15/2024
91282CCL3 1,285,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/17/22 02/18/22 1,248,206.84 1.59 2,223.01 1,269,075.85 1,220,348.44

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 07/31/2017 2.125% 07/31/2024
9128282N9 125,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/01/19 08/05/19 126,933.59 1.80 1,107.99 125,420.25 120,722.65

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2017 1.875% 08/31/2024
9128282U3 165,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/03/19 09/05/19 169,299.02 1.33 1,034.05 166,007.51 158,528.90

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/02/2017 2.125% 09/30/2024
9128282Y5 295,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/01/19 10/03/19 303,815.43 1.50 1,575.75 297,208.69 283,660.94

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2019 1.500% 10/31/2024
912828YM6 195,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/11/21 01/12/21 203,630.27 0.33 492.80 198,034.27 185,524.21

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2017 2.125% 11/30/2024
9128283J7 425,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/03/20 01/07/20 434,844.73 1.63 764.94 427,850.51 407,003.88

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2017 2.125% 11/30/2024
9128283J7 580,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/02/19 12/04/19 591,917.19 1.69 1,043.92 583,386.23 555,440.60

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 01/15/2022 1.125% 01/15/2025
91282CDS7 1,265,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/17/22 02/18/22 1,244,888.48 1.69 6,565.25 1,254,319.31 1,189,495.31

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/17/2015 2.000% 02/15/2025
912828J27 130,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/02/20 03/04/20 137,205.86 0.85 976.80 132,370.09 123,703.13

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 03/31/2020 0.500% 03/31/2025
912828ZF0 1,330,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/05/22 07/07/22 1,248,953.13 2.83 1,671.58 1,278,107.26 1,230,250.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2020 0.250% 08/31/2025
91282CAJ0 555,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/02/21 08/06/21 548,799.61 0.53 463.76 551,695.35 503,489.06

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/31/2020 0.250% 08/31/2025
91282CAJ0 1,500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/06/22 07/07/22 1,381,816.41 2.89 1,253.39 1,418,678.19 1,360,781.25

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 09/30/2020 0.250% 09/30/2025
91282CAM3 460,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/07/21 09/09/21 452,273.44 0.67 289.07 455,714.42 416,587.50

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2020 0.250% 10/31/2025
91282CAT8 350,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/01/22 03/01/22 333,361.33 1.59 147.42 339,408.37 315,875.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2020 0.250% 10/31/2025
91282CAT8 410,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/04/21 10/06/21 401,319.53 0.78 172.69 405,017.20 370,025.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 11/30/2020 0.375% 11/30/2025
91282CAZ4 210,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/02/21 11/03/21 204,659.77 1.01 66.70 206,831.03 189,525.00

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 190,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/05/21 04/07/21 185,494.92 0.89 1.94 187,618.48 171,267.18

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 12/31/2020 0.375% 12/31/2025
91282CBC4 350,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/11/21 01/12/21 347,867.19 0.50 3.56 348,925.36 315,492.17

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 160,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/03/22 05/04/22 145,500.00 2.95 250.28 149,983.55 143,624.99

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2019 2.625% 01/31/2026
9128286A3 255,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/04/21 02/08/21 282,063.87 0.47 2,792.14 269,067.85 242,648.44

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 270,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/26/21 02/26/21 264,410.16 0.80 422.34 267,065.33 242,367.17

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 475,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/02/21 07/07/21 465,871.09 0.80 743.01 469,831.14 426,386.70

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.375% 01/31/2026
91282CBH3 1,320,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/17/22 02/18/22 1,246,626.56 1.84 2,064.78 1,271,948.79 1,184,906.19

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
91282CBQ3 310,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/05/21 03/09/21 305,676.95 0.79 518.07 307,685.02 278,467.17

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/28/2021 0.500% 02/28/2026
91282CBQ3 630,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/03/21 12/07/21 613,019.53 1.15 1,052.85 619,299.22 565,917.16

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 290,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/02/21 06/04/21 289,365.62 0.79 184.22 289,629.19 260,456.25

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2021 0.750% 05/31/2026
91282CCF6 325,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/06/22 06/08/22 297,857.42 2.99 206.46 305,105.40 291,890.63

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
91282CCZ2 300,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/05/22 04/07/22 276,222.66 2.77 659.84 282,758.89 268,406.25

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
912828V98 295,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/05/22 07/07/22 287,371.48 2.85 2,493.65 288,997.75 274,303.92

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
912828V98 925,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/14/22 09/15/22 871,451.17 3.68 7,819.06 881,039.53 860,105.52

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2020 0.500% 04/30/2027
912828ZN3 1,110,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/03/22 08/05/22 992,062.50 2.92 935.05 1,014,572.26 961,710.88

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 08/15/2017 2.250% 08/15/2027
9128282R0 1,050,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/01/22 09/06/22 995,490.23 3.40 8,875.69 1,004,494.62 970,593.75

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
91282CFM8 500,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/01/22 11/03/22 496,738.28 4.27 5,184.43 497,175.12 497,187.50

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 10/31/2022 4.125% 10/31/2027
91282CFU0 340,000.00 AA+ Aaa 12/06/22 12/08/22 344,728.13 3.81 2,362.91 344,186.03 338,193.75

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 10/31/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
91282CAU5 1,210,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/04/23 01/06/23 1,030,437.89 3.91 1,019.29 1,048,404.31 1,032,659.38

US TREASURY NOTES
DTD 01/31/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
91282CBJ9 1,130,000.00 AA+ Aaa 02/07/23 02/08/23 973,962.89 3.82 3,535.15 986,236.44 969,151.51

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2023 3.625% 03/31/2028
91282CGT2 490,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/01/23 05/02/23 489,502.34 3.65 4,464.89 489,518.97 478,668.75

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
91282CBS9 575,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/08/23 05/09/23 517,095.70 3.51 1,806.69 518,812.10 503,125.00

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028
91282CHA2 420,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/01/23 05/01/23 418,047.66 3.60 2,476.63 418,112.88 408,121.89

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Security Type Sub-Total 795,000.00 799,084.70 1.06 2,836.54 795,361.44 751,415.50 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security

FANNIEMAE-ACES
DTD 04/01/2014 3.346% 03/01/2024
3136AJB54 36,983.66 AA+ Aaa 12/13/19 12/18/19 38,780.84 2.14 103.12 37,269.34 36,417.95 FHMS K043 A2
DTD 03/01/2015 3.062% 12/01/2024
3137BGK24 110,000.00 AA+ Aaa 03/19/20 03/25/20 115,448.44 1.95 280.68 111,651.72 106,331.71 FHMS K061 A2
DTD 01/30/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026
3137BTUM1 240,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/19/23 05/24/23 232,612.50 4.31 669.40 232,835.83 229,170.36 Security Type Sub-Total 386,983.66 386,841.78 3.43 1,053.20 381,756.89 371,920.02 Federal Agency Bond / Note

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/21/2020 0.250% 09/21/2023
3133EMAM4 250,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/07/20 10/09/20 249,575.00 0.31 173.61 249,967.64 247,270.00

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS NOTES
DTD 12/09/2013 3.375% 12/08/2023
3130A0F70 190,000.00 AA+ Aaa 01/30/19 01/31/19 195,600.04 2.72 409.69 190,505.65 188,281.83

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK NOTES
DTD 04/16/2020 0.500% 04/14/2025
3130AJHU6 200,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/15/20 04/16/20 199,008.00 0.60 213.89 199,644.86 184,698.60

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 260,000.00 AA+ Aaa 04/22/20 04/24/20 259,464.40 0.67 311.46 259,805.90 240,465.94

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 04/24/2020 0.625% 04/22/2025
3135G03U5 360,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/03/20 06/05/20 361,843.20 0.52 431.25 360,683.70 332,952.84

FREDDIE MAC NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/29/2020 0.750% 05/28/2025
3134GVB31 200,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/05/20 06/09/20 199,400.00 0.81 137.50 199,769.46 184,037.80

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 175,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/02/20 07/07/20 175,201.25 0.48 34.03 175,079.90 160,542.38

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 225,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/01/20 10/05/20 226,055.25 0.40 43.75 225,440.92 206,411.62

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 06/19/2020 0.500% 06/17/2025
3135G04Z3 305,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/17/20 06/19/20 304,368.65 0.54 59.30 304,751.82 279,802.43

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 04/30/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028
91282CHA2 460,000.00 AA+ Aaa 05/15/23 05/16/23 460,844.53 3.46 2,712.50 460,823.08 446,990.65

US TREASURY N/B NOTES
DTD 05/31/2023 3.625% 05/31/2028
91282CHE4 740,000.00 AA+ Aaa 06/01/23 06/02/23 737,051.56 3.71 2,272.06 737,098.41 723,928.09 Security Type Sub-Total 24,470,000.00 23,434,644.72 2.43 77,267.32 23,635,953.93 22,529,862.96 Supra-National Agency Bond / Note

INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP NOTES
DTD 11/24/2020 0.250% 11/24/2023
459058JM6 150,000.00 AAA Aaa 11/17/20 11/24/20 149,677.50 0.32 38.54 149,957.00 146,998.35

INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK NOTES
DTD 09/23/2021 0.500% 09/23/2024
4581X0DZ8 300,000.00 AAA Aaa 09/15/21 09/23/21 299,778.00 0.52 408.33 299,908.85 282,721.50 Security Type Sub-Total 450,000.00 449,455.50 0.46 446.87 449,865.85 429,719.85 Municipal Bond / Note

CA ST TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 10/24/2019 2.400% 10/01/2023
13063DRJ9 190,000.00 AA- Aa2 10/16/19 10/24/19 193,801.90 1.87 1,140.00 190,243.24 188,544.60

MS ST TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 08/06/2020 0.565% 11/01/2024
605581MZ7 200,000.00 AA Aa2 07/24/20 08/06/20 200,000.00 0.57 188.33 200,000.00 187,116.00

OR ST DEPT TRANS TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 09/17/2020 0.566% 11/15/2024
68607DVA0 135,000.00 AAA Aa1 09/11/20 09/17/20 135,000.00 0.57 97.64 135,000.00 126,775.80

FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
341271AD6 40,000.00 AA Aa3 09/03/20 09/16/20 40,282.80 1.11 251.60 40,118.20 37,061.20

FL ST BOARD OF ADMIN TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 09/16/2020 1.258% 07/01/2025
341271AD6 110,000.00 AA Aa3 09/03/20 09/16/20 110,000.00 1.26 691.90 110,000.00 101,918.30

LOS ANGELES CCD, CA TXBL GO BONDS
DTD 11/10/2020 0.773% 08/01/2025
54438CYK2 80,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/30/20 11/10/20 80,000.00 0.77 257.67 80,000.00 73,448.80

NJ TURNPIKE AUTHORITY TXBL REV BONDS
DTD 02/04/2021 1.047% 01/01/2026
646140DP5 40,000.00 AA- A1 01/22/21 02/04/21 40,000.00 1.05 209.40 40,000.00 36,550.80

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Federal Agency Bond / Note

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 07/23/2020 0.375% 07/21/2025
3137EAEU9 185,000.00 AA+ Aaa 07/21/20 07/23/20 184,078.70 0.48 308.33 184,620.67 168,804.92

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
3135G05X7 195,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/25/20 08/27/20 194,087.40 0.47 255.94 194,606.74 177,293.81

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 08/27/2020 0.375% 08/25/2025
3135G05X7 420,000.00 AA+ Aaa 10/21/20 10/22/20 417,727.80 0.49 551.25 418,989.85 381,863.58

FREDDIE MAC NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/30/2022 4.050% 08/28/2025
3134GXS54 1,000,000.00 AA+ Aaa 08/19/22 08/30/22 999,600.00 4.06 13,765.45 999,711.52 973,882.00

FREDDIE MAC NOTES
DTD 09/25/2020 0.375% 09/23/2025
3137EAEX3 285,000.00 AA+ Aaa 09/23/20 09/25/20 284,142.15 0.44 290.94 284,616.70 258,455.67

FANNIE MAE NOTES
DTD 11/12/2020 0.500% 11/07/2025
3135G06G3 185,000.00 AA+ Aaa 11/09/20 11/12/20 184,337.70 0.57 138.75 184,687.22 167,459.04 Security Type Sub-Total 4,435,000.00 4,434,489.54 1.45 17,125.14 4,432,882.55 4,152,222.46 Corporate Note

PFIZER INC CORP NOTES
DTD 03/11/2019 2.950% 03/15/2024
717081ES8 260,000.00 A+ A1 04/02/19 04/04/19 263,146.00 2.69 2,258.39 260,405.19 255,308.56 AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 05/12/2021 0.450% 05/12/2024
023135BW5 115,000.00 AA A1 05/10/21 05/12/21 114,832.10 0.50 70.44 114,951.59 110,104.45

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC CORP NOTES
(CALLAB
DTD 05/04/2017 2.625% 05/15/2024
882508BB9 300,000.00 A+ Aa3 02/23/22 02/25/22 304,716.00 1.90 1,006.25 301,624.47 292,844.70

WALMART INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 04/23/2019 2.850% 07/08/2024
931142EL3 360,000.00 AA Aa2 07/10/19 07/12/19 371,235.60 2.19 4,930.50 362,149.36 351,002.88

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORPORATE

NOTES (CAL
DTD 09/16/2020 0.653% 09/16/2024
46647PBS4 115,000.00 A- A1 09/09/20 09/16/20 115,000.00 0.65 219.03 115,000.00 113,659.91

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Corporate Note

BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)

CORPORAT
DTD 10/21/2020 0.810% 10/24/2024
06051GJH3 150,000.00 A- A1 10/16/20 10/21/20 150,000.00 0.81 226.13 150,000.00 147,452.25

JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 01/10/2022 1.250% 01/10/2025
24422EVY2 190,000.00 A A2 03/08/22 03/10/22 185,200.60 2.17 1,128.13 187,412.86 178,812.04

MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) NOTES
DTD 02/12/2015 2.700% 02/12/2025
594918BB9 190,000.00 AAA Aaa 03/15/21 03/17/21 202,921.90 0.92 1,980.75 194,836.04 183,079.63

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORP
NOTES
DTD 02/13/2020 1.800% 02/13/2025
89236TGT6 60,000.00 A+ A1 05/20/20 05/26/20 60,586.20 1.58 414.00 60,201.63 56,818.38

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP CORP
NOTES
DTD 02/13/2020 1.800% 02/13/2025
89236TGT6 90,000.00 A+ A1 05/20/20 05/26/20 90,879.30 1.58 621.00 90,302.45 85,227.57

NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP
DTD 02/14/2020 1.750% 02/14/2025
66989HAP3 295,000.00 AA- A1 05/06/20 05/08/20 305,504.95 0.98 1,964.62 298,454.61 279,733.46 AMAZON.COM INC CORPORATE NOTES
DTD 04/13/2022 3.000% 04/13/2025
023135CE4 245,000.00 AA A1 04/11/22 04/13/22 244,610.45 3.06 1,592.50 244,768.26 236,167.51

CITIGROUP INC (CALLABLE) CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 05/04/2021 0.981% 05/01/2025
172967MX6 50,000.00 BBB+ A3 04/27/21 05/04/21 50,000.00 0.98 81.75 50,000.00 47,851.00

CITIGROUP INC (CALLABLE) CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 05/04/2021 0.981% 05/01/2025
172967MX6 55,000.00 BBB+ A3 04/28/21 05/04/21 55,145.75 0.91 89.93 55,040.67 52,636.10

GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 05/22/2015 3.750% 05/22/2025
38148LAE6 135,000.00 BBB+ A2 02/12/21 02/17/21 150,819.30 0.94 548.44 141,496.06 130,346.28

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE) CORP
NOTE
DTD 06/01/2021 0.824% 06/01/2025
46647PCH7 115,000.00 A- A1 05/24/21 06/01/21 115,000.00 0.82 78.97 115,000.00 109,278.98

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Corporate Note

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE
DTD 08/10/2021 0.768% 08/09/2025
46647PCM6 50,000.00 A- A1 08/03/21 08/10/21 50,000.00 0.77 151.47 50,000.00 47,078.60

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO CORPORATE
NOTES
DTD 11/13/2020 0.750% 11/13/2025
110122DN5 72,000.00 A+ A2 06/17/21 06/21/21 71,282.88 0.98 72.00 71,613.31 65,305.44

BANK OF AMERICA CORP NOTES
(CALLABLE)
DTD 03/22/2022 3.384% 04/02/2026
06051GKM0 220,000.00 A- A1 03/17/22 03/22/22 220,000.00 3.38 1,840.52 220,000.00 210,816.32

TARGET CORP CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
87612EBM7 25,000.00 A A2 01/19/22 01/24/22 24,957.50 1.99 224.79 24,969.73 22,875.65

TARGET CORP CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
87612EBM7 125,000.00 A A2 01/27/22 01/31/22 124,923.75 1.96 1,123.96 124,945.49 114,378.25

BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPOR
DTD 01/26/2022 2.050% 01/26/2027
06406RBA4 200,000.00 A A1 01/26/22 01/28/22 200,644.00 1.98 1,765.28 200,457.59 179,754.80

BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
CORPOR
DTD 01/26/2022 2.050% 01/26/2027
06406RBA4 300,000.00 A A1 08/02/22 08/04/22 280,158.00 3.67 2,647.91 284,172.49 269,632.20

ADOBE INC (CALLABLE) CORP NOTE
DTD 02/03/2020 2.150% 02/01/2027
00724PAC3 360,000.00 A+ A2 12/13/22 12/15/22 332,316.00 4.20 3,225.00 335,948.49 330,551.64

JPMORGAN CHASE CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2021 1.578% 04/22/2027
46647PCB0 260,000.00 A- A1 08/02/22 08/04/22 235,172.60 3.81 786.37 239,944.88 233,617.02

HOME DEPOT INC CORP NOTES (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/14/2017 2.800% 09/14/2027
437076BT8 350,000.00 A A2 01/25/23 01/27/23 330,256.50 4.15 2,912.78 332,066.22 325,461.15 Security Type Sub-Total 4,687,000.00 4,649,309.38 2.35 31,960.91 4,625,761.39 4,429,794.77 Certificate of Deposit

Item 17.

Managed Account Detail of Securities Held For the Month Ending June 30, 2023 CITY OF COACHELLA - OPERATING PORTFOLIO - 995343 - (14201484) Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Trade Settle Original YTM Accrued Amortized Market Par
Certificate of Deposit

TORONTO DOMINION BANK NY CERT
DEPOS
DTD 10/31/2022 5.470% 10/25/2024
89115B6F2 325,000.00 A A1 10/27/22 10/31/22 325,000.00 5.44 11,999.81 325,000.00 324,790.38 Security Type Sub-Total 325,000.00 325,000.00 5.44 11,999.81 325,000.00 324,790.38 Asset-Backed Security
HAROT 2020-1 A3
DTD 02/26/2020 1.610% 04/22/2024
43813RAC1 1,064.85 NR Aaa 02/19/20 02/26/20 1,064.64 1.61 0.48 1,064.81 1,063.08 CARMX 2020-1 A3
DTD 01/22/2020 1.890% 12/16/2024
14315XAC2 10,920.24 AAA NR 01/14/20 01/22/20 10,918.09 1.89 9.17 10,919.60 10,869.62 HAROT 2021-1 A3
DTD 02/24/2021 0.270% 04/21/2025
43813GAC5 22,237.68 NR Aaa 02/17/21 02/24/21 22,237.27 0.27 1.67 22,237.50 21,708.31 HART 2021-A A3
DTD 04/28/2021 0.380% 09/15/2025
44933LAC7 26,635.09 AAA NR 04/20/21 04/28/21 26,632.29 0.38 4.50 26,633.68 25,954.33 CARMX 2021-1 A3
DTD 01/27/2021 0.340% 12/15/2025
14316NAC3 14,760.46 AAA NR 01/20/21 01/27/21 14,757.54 0.34 2.23 14,758.99 14,333.27 TAOT 2021-C A3
DTD 09/27/2021 0.430% 01/15/2026
89239BAC5 63,949.19 AAA Aaa 09/21/21 09/27/21 63,944.10 0.43 12.22 63,946.18 61,599.54 CARMX 2021-2 A3
DTD 04/21/2021 0.520% 02/17/2026
14314QAC8 42,988.33 AAA NR 04/13/21 04/21/21 42,979.07 0.52 9.94 42,983.28 41,476.50 HART 2021-C A3
DTD 11/17/2021 0.740% 05/15/2026
44935FAD6 35,000.00 AAA NR 11/09/21 11/17/21 34,992.19 0.75 11.51 34,995.00 33,640.63 DCENT 2021-A1 A1
DTD 09/27/2021 0.580% 09/15/2026
254683CP8 55,000.00 AAA Aaa 09/20/21 09/27/21 54,988.22 0.58 14.18 54,992.39 51,755.27 Security Type Sub-Total 272,555.84 272,513.41 0.56 65.90 272,531.43 262,400.55 Managed Account Sub-Total 35,821,539.50 34,751,339.03 2.27 142,755.69 34,919,113.48 33,252,126.49