Costa Mesa City Council
June 4, 2024

TABLE 2 – Proposed Fee Total

FEE TYPE TOTAL FEES DUE
(Per DA)

YEAR FEE PAID TOTAL FEES
(Paid at the end of
5 years)
YEAR 1 YEAR 5**
Includes 3% Interest
Public Safety* $2,000,000 $2,000,000 - $2,000,000
Comm Infrastructure* $1,000,000 $1,000,000 - $1,000,000 Economic Recovery $3,000,000 - $3,477,822 $3,477,822
Dev Impact $10,532,789 $5,065,089 $6,338,563 $11,403,652 TOTAL $16,532,789 $8,065,089 $9,816,385 $17,881,474
*Fee and timing of payment are unchanged from the Original Development Agreement. **Interest starts accruing after Year 1 so the remaining balance of the fees paid Year 5 includes the 3% interest rate.

Project Effective Date

As discussed above, t he One Metro West development entitlements included three Ordinances that are not yet in effect. Ordinances Nos. 2021 -11, 2021 -12, and 2021 -13 each contain the following language regarding the effective date: “This ordinance shall become effective following approval of the Project by the electorate at the next regular municipal election or at a special election funded by the applicant”. With the passage of Measure K, and subsequent amendm ents to Article 22, the applicant is now requesting that the project Ordinances be revised to indicate that the project effective date is the 31st day after Ordinance adoption.

Artwork Conditions of Approval

The One Metro West project includes the development of a parking structure located adjacent to the I- 405 freeway. To enhance the façade of the parking structure as viewed from the freeway, the project includes a public art display. The design of the art installment was not known at the time of City Council review and therefore, the project entitlements, when effective, included conditions pertaining to the required review and approval of the art piece. The below Exhibit 1 from the approved project Master Plan shows an example of where a potential art installation would occur.

401

Item #: 24-230 Meeting Date: 06/04/2024

EXHIBIT 1 – Example Art Installation

The following are two conditions in the project Resolution conditions of approval (Resolution 2021-55) addressing the public art requirement:
 COA No. 9 – The final design of the public art display on Building A’s parking structure façade along the I-405 Freeway, which shall incorporate vertical landscaping, shall be subject to review and final approval by the Planning Commission. The Cultural Arts Committee (CAC) may first review the proposed freeway façade design and make recommendations to the Planning Commission. No public art display visible along the I-405 Freeway shall be installed without prior review by and approval from the Planning Commission.

 COA No. 66 – Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the proposed project, the owner/developer would be required to submit a Design Plan for the Building “A” parking elevation (façade) along the I-405 Freeway for review by the Planning Division and approval by the City’s Cultural Arts Committee. All architectural treatments would exclude the use of moving, flashing, or otherwise visually distracting elements or materials that are highly reflec tive or generate noise. [PPP-AES-1]

As conditioned, the applicant believes that requiring the submittal of the art design prior to the issuance of the “first building permit”, along with the requirement to incorporate vertical landscaping, is “restrictive and unnecessarily constrains the creative team to a shortened timeframe when the building to which the art display will be attached won’t be ready to receive the installation until many months later”. As such, the applicant is requesting the following amendments to the conditions:
402

Item #: 24-230 Meeting Date: 06/04/2024

1. Remove Condition No. 9. Instead, the applicant is requesting that the “final design” be subject to the Planning Division and the Arts Commission approval, pursuant to Condition of Approval No. 66. The applicant request would also remove the requirement to install vertical landscaping; and

2. Amend Condition of Approval No. 66 to modify the art design plan submittal date to prior to certificate of occupancy for Building “A”, instead of prior to the “first building permit.”

As indicated above, the project is currently conditioned for the art display to be reviewed by the Cultural Arts Committee with final approval by the Planning Commission (COA No. 9). However, in 2022, the City Council replaced the Cultural Arts Committee with t he Arts Commission. Therefore, it is appropriate to amend the project conditions to replace the Arts Committee language with Arts Commission. However, although the Planning Commission emphasized that the Arts Commission would take the lead on the actual art, they believed the final approval should remain with the Planning Commission as they would focus on the architectural components of the installation.

The Planning Commission did not recommend modifying the intent of Condition of Approval No. 66 as it’s a mitigation measure and the language is taken directly from the Final EIR. Further, the Planning Commission is not in support of the applicant’s request to delay the submittal of the design plan for the elevation and art to “certificate of occupancy”, as it would potentially diminish a cohesive art and elevation design, as the applicant’s request would constrain a future art design to a previously constructed facade. However, the Planning Commission is supportive of clarifying the language to indicate that the design plan for the art installation could be submitted at the first structural building permit. In summary, the Planning Commission recommendation results in both conditions remaining with certain minor edits.

Lastly, following the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant submitted a letter requesting the language pertaining to the vertical landscaping be modified, rather than requesting it be eliminated (Attachment 6). If the City Council is supportive of the request, the following language could be added to Condition No. 9 “ shall incorporate vertical landscaping where appropriate as determined by the reviewing bodies…”. This additional language would enable the Arts and Planning Commission to add vertical l andscaping where they believe it is beneficial and appropriate to do so. To review the modified Conditions please review Exhibit D of the Attached Resolution.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the project was reviewed and found to be consistent with the One Metro West Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2019050014), which was certified on May 4, 2021, by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa (Resolution No. 2021-54). Pursuant to Section 15162 of the Guidelines, no subsequent environmental review is warranted for the project because there are no substantial changes to the project in that there are no modifications to the approved project plans , or required mitigation measures that would relate to the mitigation of a project environmental effect , and no new information of previously unknown environmental effects.

403

Item #: 24-230 Meeting Date: 06/04/2024

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council has the following alternatives:

1. Give first reading. The City Council may give first reading to the draft Ordinances.

2. Give first reading with modifications. The City Council may modify the draft Ordinances and give first reading.

3. Not adopt the proposed changes. The City Council may choose to not adopt the proposed amendments.

4. Continue the Ordinances review to a date certain. The City Council may continue the item to a date certain with direction for staff to return with additional information, changes and/or clarifications.

FISCAL REVIEW:

The City’s Fina nce Department has reviewed the applicant’s requested payment modifications and determined that the requested five-year payment plan with a three percent (3%) interest rate, in the amount of $1,348,685, retains the fund's “net present value” by recovering the potential interest and/or inflation monetary reductions that may result by the requested payment delays.

The result is a total payment of $17,881,474 at the end of the five -year term compared to the current Development Agreement of $16,532,789, which requires all fees to be paid in Phase I - at the time of issuance of the first building permit.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The draft Ordinances and staff report have been prepared in conjunction with and reviewed by the City Attorney’s Office.

PUBLIC NOTICE:

Pursuant to Title 13, Section 13 -29(d), of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, three types of public notification have been completed no less than 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing:

1. Mailed notice. A public notice was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the project site. The required notice radius is measured from the external boundaries of the property.

2. On-site posting. A public notice was posted on each street frontage of the project site.

3. Newspaper publication. A public notice was published once in the Daily Pilot newspaper.

Public comments received prior to the June 4, 2024 City Council meeting, may be viewed at this link:

CITY OF COSTA MESA - Calendar (legistar.com).

404

Item #: 24-230 Meeting Date: 06/04/2024

CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item supports the City Council Goal to diversify, stabilize, and increase housing to reflect the community needs in that the project contributes to helping the City meet its City’s 6th Cycle RHNA allocations, including affordable housing allocation. The project includes 1,057 units within a mixed - use multi-family residential development. The project provides 10 percent of the project dwelling units (minimum of 106 units) as affordable units to low- and very-low-income households.

CONCLUSION:

The proposed amendments do not modify the development plans ; rather, they modify the timing of implementing the project while ensuring the City receives the agreed -upon public benefits. The amendments to the Development Agreement from a single fee payment to a two -payment plan over five years with a 3% interest rate, is intended to assist the applicant in meeting the financial commitments to the City while ensuring the City retains the full value of the development fees. Lastly, the applicant proposed language modifications to the Ordinances would be consistent with Article 22 of the CMMC . Based on the above, staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed amendments, as stated in this Report, and per the attached Ordinances and Resolution.

405
ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 1 of 35

ORDINANCE NO. 20 24-xx

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DA-20-02 BETWEEN THE

CITY OF COSTA MESA AND INTERNATIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDING

GROUP, LLC

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA , CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY FIND AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, public hearings were held on April 13, 2020 and May 11, 2020 before the Planning Commission pursuant to the Procedures and Requirements for Consideration of Development Agreements set forth in City Council Resolution No. 88 -53, regarding the proposed Development Agreement DA-20-02, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” (hereinafter, the “Agreement”), at which time the Planning Commission considered testimony presented by the public and applicant and property owner International Asset Management Holding Group, LLC (hereinafter, “Developer”) and thereafter made recommendations to the City Council;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was subsequently held before the City Council on June 15, 2021 pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No. 88 -53, at which time the City Council considered testimony presented by the public and the Developer and the recommendations of the Planning Commission regarding the proposed Agreement; and WHEREAS, on June 15, 2021, the City Council approved the first reading by a 5 -1 vote (Councilmember Harper voting no and Councilmember Harlan recusing); WHEREAS, on July 20, 2021, the City Council approved the second reading by a 5- 1 vote (Councilmember Harper voting no and Councilmember Harlan recusing); WHEREAS, at the time of City Council approval, the project was subject to a vote of the electorate pursuant to Measure Y, “An Ordinance to give the People of Costa Mesa Control of Their Future ” codified in Article 22, Chapter IX of the Zoning Code , such that Ordinance 2021-11 stated that the “Ordinance shall become effective following approval of the Project by the electorate at the regular municipal election or at a special election funded by the applicant”;
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2022, “ Measure K” was adopted by the Costa Mesa electorate, which amended Article 22 to allow for the development of housing in specific commercial and industrial areas without a vote by the electorate while keeping residential neighborhoods intact and revitalizing commercial corridors; 406
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 2 of 35

WHEREAS, the subject project is located at 1683 Sunf lower Avenue which is located within the Measure K boundaries and accordingly no longer requires approval by the electorate;
WHEREAS, the applicant and property owner , International Asset Management Holding Group, LLC, by their authorized agent Brent Stoll with Rose Equities, requested to amend the Ordinances to be consistent with Costa Mesa Zoning Code, Article 22, eliminating the electoral vote requirement;
WHEREAS, Rose Equities also requested amending the timing of payment of impact fees and community benefits fund;
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2024, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission, after taking public testimony, recommended that the City Council approve the requested amendments;
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the C ity Council on June 4, 2024, with all persons having the opportunity to speak for and against the proposal; WHEREAS, on June 4, 2024, the City Council approved the first reading by a x-x vote gave first reading to the Ordinance;
WHEREAS, the Agreement is:
(a) Consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and with the General Plan as a whole and the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan;
(b) Compatible with the uses authorized in, and the existing land use regulations prescribed for, the zoning district in which the real property is and will be located; and
(c) Is in conformity with and will promote public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practice.

WHEREAS, the Agreement will not:
(a) Be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare; or (b) Adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values.

WHEREAS, The Agreement will promote and encourage th e development of the proposed project and will ensure the public benefits promised therein, by providing stability and certainty to Developer;
407
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 3 of 35

WHEREAS, the approved project include d General Plan Amendment GP -20-01, Rezone R-20-01, Specific Plan SP-20-01, Master Plan PA-19-19 and Tentative Tract Map No. 19015 (T-19-01) (the “Project”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared by the City in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and certified by the City Council on May 4, 2021, by Resolution No. 2021-54;
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 the proposed amendments are in substantial conformance with the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the One Metro West project (State Clearing House No. 2019050014), including a mitigation monitoring program and statem ent of overriding considerations, which was certified by the City Council on May 4, 2021, and that no further environmental review under CEQA is required.

WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

Now, therefor e, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA , CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: Findings and Declarations. The above stated findings and declarations are true and correct.

Section 2: Approval. The City Council hereby approves, adopts and enters into the Agreement in the form attached hereto and incorporates the Agreement herein by this reference.

Section 3: Recordation. Upon execution of the Agreement by all parties, the City Clerk is directed to record the Amendment pursuant to Resolution No. 88-53.

Section 4: Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and State CEQA guidelines, a Final EIR, State Clearing House No. 2019050014, including a mitigation monitoring program and statement of overriding consideration, was certified for the Project on May 4, 2021, and the City has determined that this Ordinance itself is not a separate "project" and further, that it is exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (because it can be s een with certainty that the adoption of this Ordinance itself will not have an effect on the environment) such that no further environmental review under CEQA is required; and 408
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 4 of 35

Section 5: Inconsistencies. Any provision of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and or further, is hereby repealed or modified to the extent necessary to affect the provisions of this ordinance.

Section 6: Severability. If any chapter, article, section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance, or the application thereof to any person, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or its application to other persons. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each chapter, article, section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of the application thereof to any person, be declared invalid or u nconstitutional.

No portion of this Ordinance shall supersede any local, State, or Federal law, regulation, or codes dealing with life safety factors.

Section 7: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the 31st day after adoption.

Section 8: Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner as required by law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of _______________ 2024.

__________________________
John Stephens
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa

409
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 5 of 35

ATTEST:

___________________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________
Kimberly Hall Barlow
City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 2024-xx was duly introduced for first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day of June, 2024, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ___ day of _________, 2024, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this ___ day of ___________, 2024.

__________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

410

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 6 of 35

EXHIBIT A – Revised Development Agreement 20-02

Legend: New text is shown in underlined bold, and the deleted text is shown in strikethrough.

Note: The document covenants have been renumbered to account for added text and or sections.

411

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 6 of 33

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 20-02

A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN

CITY OF COSTA MESA
and

INTERNATIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDING GROUP, LLC

Approved July 20, 2021, by Ordinance No. 2021-11
Amended by the City Council on _________, 2024
412

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 8 of 33

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 20-02
This Development Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”) is entered into as of this ___ day of _______, 202_ by and between the City of Costa Mesa, California (hereinafter “CITY”), and International Asset Management Holding Group, LLC, a California Limit ed Liability Company (hereinafter “OWNER”):

RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY is authorized to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property, pursuant to Section 65864, et seq. of the Government Code; and
WHEREAS, This Agreement constitutes a current exercise of CITY’s police powers to provide predictability to OWNER in the development approval process by vesting the permitted uses, density, intensity of use, and timing and phasing of development consistent with the Development Plan in exchange for OWNER’s commitment to provide significant public benefits to CITY as set forth in Section 4, below.

WHEREAS, OWNER has requested CITY to enter into a development agreement and proceedings have been taken in accordance with the rules and regulations of CITY; and WHEREAS, the best interests of the citizens of the CITY and the public health, safety and welfare will be served by entering into this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that this Agreement is of major significance because it will enable the development of a mixed -use project with residential, commercial, creative office and open space uses and provide the CITY with additional funds that could be used for CITY facilities and will therefore implement numerous general plan and other public policies of the CITY; and WHEREAS, the provision by OWNER of these aforementioned public benefits allows the CITY to realize significant economic, and social benefits; and WHEREAS, the physical effects, if any, of the Project and this Agreement have been analyzed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Pub. Res. Code section 21000 et seq.); and
WHEREAS, this Agreement and the Project are consistent with the Costa Mesa General Plan, as amended, and any specific plan, as amended, applicable thereto; and WHEREAS, all actions taken and approvals given by CITY have been duly taken or approved in accordance with all applicable legal requirements for notice, public hearings, findings, votes, and othe r procedural matters; and
WHEREAS, development of the Property in accordance with this Agreement will provide substantial benefits to CITY and will further important policies and goals of CITY; and WHEREAS, this Agreement will eliminate uncertainty in plan ning and provide for the orderly development of the Property, ensure progressive installation of necessary improvements, provide for public services appropriate to the development of the Project, and generally serve the purposes for which development agreements under Section 65864, et seq. of the Government Code are intended. 413

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 9 of 33

COVENANTS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequa cy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1. DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS.

1.1 Definitions. The following terms when used in this Agreement shall be defined as follows:

1.1.1 “Agreement” means this Development Agreement.

1.1.2 “CITY” means the City of Costa Mesa, a California municipal corporation.

1.1.3 “City Council” means the duly elected city council of the City of Costa Mesa.

1.1.4 “Commencement Date” means the date the Term of this Agreement commences.

1.1.5 “Construction Date” means the date the first building permit is issued.

1.1.6 “Development” means the improvement of the Property for the purposes of completing the structures, improvements and facilities comprising the Project including, but not limited to:
grading; the construction of infrastructure and public facilities related to the Project whether located within or outside the Property; the construction of buildings and structures; and the installation of landscaping. “Development” does not include the maintenance, repair, reconstruction or redevelopment of any building, structure, improvement or facility after the construction and completion thereof.

1.1.7 “Development Approvals” means all permits and other entitlements for use subject to approval or issuance by CITY in connection with development of the Property including, but not limited to:
(a) general plan, general plan amendments, specific plans and specific plan amendments;
(b) tentative and final subdivision and parcel maps;
(c) conditional use permits and master plans;
(d) zoning, zoning map amendments, and zoning text amendments; and, (e) grading and building permits.

1.1.8 “Development Exaction” means any requirement of CITY in connection with or pursuant to any Land Use Regulation or Development Approval for the dedication of land, the construction of improvements or public facilities, or the payment of fees in order to lessen, offset, mitigate or compensate for the impacts of development on the environment or other public interests.

1.1.9 “Development Impact Fee” a monetary exaction other than a tax or special assessment, whether es tablished for a broad class of projects by legislation of general applicability or imposed on a specific project on an ad hoc basis, that is charged by a local agency to the applicant in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost 414

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 10 of 33

of public facilities related to the development project, but does not include park “in lieu” fees specified in Government Code Section 66477, fees for processing applications for governmental regulatory actions or approvals, or fees collected under development agreements adopted pursuant to Article 2.5 of the Government Code (commencing with Section 65864) of Chapter 4.

1.1.10 “Development Plan” means the plan for development of the Prop erty as set forth in the vested entitlements listed in Exhibit “C”.
(a) “Director” means the Director of the City’s Development Services Department, including his or her designee.

1.1.11 “Effective Date ” means the date the ordinance approving and authorizing this Agreement becomes effective.

1.1.12 "Interest Cha rge” means the interest payment applied to deferred Development Exaction and Development Impact Fees.

1.1.13 “Interest Rate” means the rate of interest, three percent (3%) per year, compounded annually, used to calculate the Interest Charge.

1.1.14 “Land Use Regulations ” means all ordinances, resolutions, codes, rules, regulations and official policies of CITY governing the development and use of land, including, without limitation, the permitted use of land, the density or intensity of use, subdivision requirements, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, and the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to th e development of the Property. “ Land Use Regulations” does not include any CITY ordinance, resolution, code, rule, regulation or official policy, governing:
(a) the conduct of businesses, professions, and occupations; (b) taxes (special or general) and assessments;
(c) the control and abatement of nuisances;
(d) the granting of encroachment permits and the conveyance of rights and interests that provide for the use of or the entry upon public property; (e) the exercise of the power of eminent domain.

1.1.15 “OWNER” means the persons and entities listed as OWNER on page 1 of th is Agreement and their successors in interest to all or any part of the Property.

1.1.16 “Mortgagee” means a mortgagee of a mortgage, a beneficiary under a deed of trust or any other security-device lender, and their successors and assigns.

1.1.17 “Project” means the de velopment of the Property contemplated by the Development Plan as such Plan may be further defined, enhanced or modified pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

1.1.18 “Property” means the real property described on Exhibit “A” and shown on Exhibit “B” to this Agreement.
415

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 11 of 33

1.1.19 “Public Benefit” refers to those benefits provided to the CITY and the community by OWNER pursuant to Section 4 below.

1.1.20 “Reservation of Rights” means the rights and authority excepted from the assurances and rights provided to OWNER under this Agreement and reserved to CITY under Section 3.3 of this Agreement.

1.2 Exhibits. The following documents are attached to, and by this reference made a part of, this Agreement:

Exhibit “A” – Legal Description of the Property.

Exhibit “B” – Map showing Property and its location.

Exhibit “C” – Development Plan.

Exhibit “D” – Development Impact Fees

2. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

2.1 Binding Effect of Agreement . The Property is hereby made subject to this Agreement.

Development of the Property is hereby fully vested and authorized and shall be carried out in substantial accordance with the terms of the Development Plan and this Agreement.

2.2 Ownership of Property. OWNER represents and covenants that it is the owner of the fee simple title to, or has an equitable interest in, the Property or a portion thereof.

2.3 City Council Findings. The City Council finds that:

2.3.1 This Agreement is consistent with the CITY’s General Plan, as amended.

2.3.2 This Agreement ensures a desirable and functional community environment, provides effective and efficient development of public facilities, infrastructure, and services appropriate for the development of the Project and enhances effective utilization of resources within the CITY.

2.3.3 This Agreement provides public benefits to the City.

2.3.4 This Agreement strengthens the public planning process, encourages private participation in comprehensive planning and reduces costs of development and government.

2.3.5 The best interests of the citizens of the CITY and the public health, safety, and welfare will be served by entering into this Agreement.

2.4 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date (the “Commencement Date”) that is the Effective Date, and shall continue for a period of twenty five (25) years thereafter, unless this term is modified or extended pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. Thereafter, the OWNER shall have no vested right under this Agreement, regardless of whether or not OWNER has paid any Development Impact Fee.
416

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 12 of 33

2.5 Assignment.

2.5.1 Right to Assign . OWNER shall have the right to sell, transfer or assign the Property in whole or in part (provided that no such partial transfer shall violate the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et seq.) to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement; provided, however, that any such sale, transfer or assignment shall include the assignment and assumption of the rights, duties and obligations arising under or from this Agreement and be made in strict compliance with the following conditions precedent:
(a) No sale, transfer or assignment of any right or interest under this Agreement shall be made unless made together with the sale, transfer or assignment of all or a part of the Property. (b) Concurrent with any such sale, transfer or assignment, OWNER shall notify CITY, in writing, of such sale, transfer or assignment and shall provide CITY with an executed agreement (“Assignment and Assumption Agreement”), in a form reasonably acceptable to CITY, by the purchaser, transferee or assignee and providing therein that the purchaser, transferee or assignee expressly and unconditionally assumes all the duties, obligations, agreements, covenants, waivers of OWNER under this Agreement, including, without limitation, the covenants not to sue and waivers contained in Sections

7.2 and 8.4 hereof.

Any sale, transfer or assignment not made in strict compliance with the foregoing conditions shall constitute a default by OWNER under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the failure of any purchaser, transferee or assignee to execute the agreement required by Paragraph (b) of this Subsection 2.5.1, the burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon such purchaser, transferee or assignee, but the benefits of this Agreement shall not inure to such purchaser, transferee or assignee until and unless such agreement is executed.

2.5.2 Release of Transferring Owner. Notwithstanding any sale, transfer or assignment, a transferring OWNER shall continue to be obligated under this Agreement with respect to the transferred Property or any transferred portion thereof, unless such transferring OWNER is given a release in writing by CITY, which release shall be provided by CITY upon the full satisfaction by such transferring OWNER of the following conditions:
(a) OWNER no longer has a legal or equitable interest in all or any part of the Property subject to the transfer.
(b) OWNER is not then in default under this Agreement.
(c) OWNER has provided CITY with the notice and executed agreement required under Paragraph (b) of Subsection 2.5.1 above. (d) The purchaser, transferee or assignee provides CITY with security equivalent to any security previously provided by OWNER to secure performance of its obligations hereunder.

2.5.3 Subsequent Assignment. Any subseq uent sale, transfer or assignment after an initial sale, transfer or assignment shall be made only in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Section.

2.5.4 Utilities. The Project shall be connected to all utilities necessary to provide adequate water, sewer, gas, electric, and other utility service to the Project, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any portion of the Project. 417

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 13 of 33

2.5.5 Sale to Public and Completion of Construction. The provisions of Subsection 2.5.1 shall not apply to the sale or lease (for a period longer than one year) of any lot or condominium that has been finally subdivided and is individually (and not in "bulk") sold or leased to a member of the public or other ultimate user. This Agreement shall terminate with respect to any lot /condominium and such lot/condominium shall be released and no longer be subject to this Agreement without the execution or recordation of any further document upon satisfaction of both of the following conditions:
(a) The lot/condominium has been finally subdivided and individually (and not in "bulk") sold or leased (for a period longer than one year) to a member of the public or other ultimate user; and
(b) A certificate of occupancy has been issued for a building on the lot/condominium, and the fees for such lot set forth in this Agreement have been paid.

2.6 Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement. This Agreement may be amended or canceled in whole or in part only by written consent of all parties in the manner provided for in G overnment Code Section 65868 . This provision shall not limit any remedy of CITY or OWNER as provided by this Agreement.

2.7 Termination. This Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further effect upon the occurrence of any of the following events:
(a) Expiration of the stated term of this Agreement as set forth in Section 2.4. (b) Entry of a final judgment setting aside, voiding or annulling the adoption of the ordinance approving this Agreement.
(c) Completion of the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement including issuance of all required occupancy permits and acceptance by CITY or applicable public agency of all required dedications.

Termination of this Agreement shall not constitute termination of any other land use entitlements approved for the Property. Upon the termination of this Agreement, no party shall have any further right or obligation hereunder except with respect to any obligation to have been performed prior to such termination or with respect to any default in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement that has occurred prior to such ter mination or with respect to any obligations that are specifically set forth as surviving this Agreement. Upon such termination, any Development Impact Fees paid by OWNER to CITY for residential units on which construction has not yet begun shall be refunded to OWNER by CITY.

2.8 Notices.
(a) As used in this Agreement, "notice" includes, but is not limited to, the communication of notice, request, demand, approval, statement, report, acceptance, consent, waiver, appointment or other communication required or permitted hereunder. (b) All notices shall be in writing and shall be considered given either: (i) when delivered in person to the recipient named below; or (ii) on the date of delivery shown on the return receipt, after deposit in the United States mail in a sealed envelope as either registered or certified mail with return receipt requested, and postage and postal charges prepaid, and addressed to the recipient named below; or (iii) on the date of delivery shown in the records of the telegraph company after transmission by telegraph to the recipient named below. All notices shall be addressed as follows:
418

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 14 of 33

If to CITY:

City of Costa Mesa
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
(714) 754-5245
Attn: City Manager
Copy to:

Jones & Mayer
3777 N Harbor Blvd.

Fullerton, CA
(714) 446-1400
Attn: Kimberly Hall Barlow
If to OWNER:

Rose Equities, as agent for International Asset Management Holding Group, LLC 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 632
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Attn: Brent Stoll
Telephone: (323) 782-4300
Copy to:

Rutan & Tucker, LLP
611 Anton Blvd., Suite 1400
Costa Mesa, CA 92694
Attn: John A. Ramirez
Telephone: (714) 662-4610
(c) Either party may, by notice given at any time, require subsequent notices to be given to another person or entity, whether a party or an officer or representative of a party, or to a different address, or both. Notices given before actual receipt of notice of change shall not be invalidated by the change.

3. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY.

3.1 Rights to Develop . Subject to the terms of this Agreement including the Re servation of Rights, OWNER shall have a vested right to develop the Property in accordance with, and to the extent of, this Agreement. Except as expressly provided otherwise herein, the Project shall remain subject to all Land Use Regulations and Development Approvals in effect on the Effective Date that are required to complete the Project as contemplated by the Development Plan. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the permitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use, the maxi mum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation and dedication of land for public purposes shall be those set forth in the Land Use Regulations and Development Approvals in effect on the Effective Date or , if consented to by OWNER , those subsequently adopted or amended . OWNER shall comply with all mitigation measures required to be undertaken pursuant to any document prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to the Project. 419

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 15 of 33

3.2 Effect of Agreeme nt on Land Use Regulations . Except as otherwise provided under the terms of this Agreement including the Reservation of Rights, the rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use of the Property, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to development of the Property shall be the Land Use Regulations and Development Approvals in effect on the Ef fective Date. In connection with any subsequently adopted Development Approvals and except as specifically provided otherwise herein, CITY may exercise its discretion in accordance with the Land Use Regulations then in effect, as provided by this Agreemen t, including, but not limited to, the Reservation of Rights. CITY shall accept for processing, review and action all applications for subsequent development approvals, and such applications shall be processed expeditiously.

3.3 Reservation of Rights.

3.3.1 Limitations, Reservations and Exceptions . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the following regulations shall apply to the development of the Property:
(a) Processing fees and charges of every kind and nature imposed by CITY to cover the estimated actual costs to CITY of processing applications for Development Approvals or for monitoring compliance with any Development Approvals granted or issued. (b) Procedural regulations relating to hearing bodies, petitions, applications, notices, findings, records, hearings, reports, recommendations, appeals and any other matter of procedure. (c) Regulations, policies and rules governing engineering and construction standards and specifications applicable to public and private improvements, including, without limitation, all uniform codes adopted by the City and any local amendments to those codes adopted by the CITY, including, without limitation, the CITY's Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Electrical Code, and Grading Ordinance.
(d) Regulations imposing Development Exactions; provided, however, that no such subsequently adopted Development Exaction shall be applicable to development of the Property unless such Development Exaction is applied uniformly to development, either throughout the CITY or within a defined area of benefit which includes the Property. No such subsequently adopted Development Exaction shall apply if its application to the Property would physically prevent development of the Property for the uses and to the density or intensity of development set forth in the Development Plan. In the event any such subsequently adopted Development Exaction fulfills the same purposes, in whole or in part, as the fees set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement, CITY shall allow a credit against such subsequently adopted Development Exaction for the fees paid under Section 4 of this Agreement to the extent such fees fulfill the same purposes.
(e) Regulations that may be in material conflict with this Agreement but that are reasonably necessary to protect the residents of the project or the immediate community from a condition perilous to their health or safety. To the extent possible, any such regulations shall be applied and construed so as to provide OWNER with the rights and assurances provided under this Agreement. (f) Regulations that are not in material conflict with this Agreement or the Development Plan. Any regulation, whether adopted by initiative or otherwise, limiting the rate or timing of development of the Property shall be deemed to materially conflict with the Development Plan and shall therefore not be applicable to the development of the Property. 420

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 16 of 33

(g) Regulations that are in material conflict with the Development Plan; provided OWNER has given written consent to the application of such regulations to development of that Property in which the OWNER has a legal or equitable interest. (h) Regulations that impose, levy, alter or amend fees, charges, or Land Use Regulations relating to consumers or end users, including, without limitation, trash can placement, service charges and limitations on vehicle parking.
(i) Regulations of other public agencies, including Development Impact Fees adopted or imposed by such other public agencies, although collected by CITY.

3.3.2 Subsequent Development Approvals. This Agreement shall not prevent CITY, in acting on subsequent development approvals and to the same extent it would otherwise be authorized to do so absent this Agreement, from applying subsequently adopted or amended Land Use Regulations that do not materially conflict with this Agreement and do not impose increased costs on OWNER.

3.3.3 Modification or Suspension by State or Federal Law . In the event that State, County or Federal laws or regulations, enacted a fter the Effective Date of this Agreement, prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such State or Federal laws or regulations; provided, however, that this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent with such laws or regulations and to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such remaining provisions impractical to enforce.

3.4 Regulation by Other Public Agencies . It is acknowledged by the parties that other public agencies not within the control of CITY may possess authority to regulate aspects of the development of the Property separately from or jointly with CITY and this Agreement does not limit the authority of such other public agencies.

3.5 Timing of Development . Because the California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal. 3d 465 (1984), that the failure of the parties in that c ase to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later -adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over the parties’ agreement, it is the specific intent of the Parties to provide for the timing of the Project in this Agre ement. To do so, the Parties acknowledge and provide that Owner shall have the right, but not the obligation, to complete the Project in such order, at such rate, at such times, and in as many development phases and sub-phases as Owner deems appropriate in its sole subjective business judgment.

3.6 Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions. Owner shall have the ability to reserve and record such covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) against the Property as Owner deems appropriate, in its sole and absolute discretion. Such CC&Rs may not conflict with this Agreement or the General Plan.

Before recording any CC&Rs, Owner shall provide a copy of the CC&Rs to the City for review and approval by the City Attorney. The City Attorney’s review shall be limited to determining if the CC&Rs substantially comply with this Agreement. Within thirty (30) days after receiving a copy of the proposed CC&Rs from Owner, the City Attorney shall provide Owner with either (i) a statement that the CC&Rs comply with this Agreement (“CC&R Approval”) or (ii) written comments identifying each aspect of the CC&Rs which the City Attorney believes not to be in compliance with this Agreement (a “Statement of Non-Compliance”). If the City Attorney fails to provide Owner with either CC&R Approval or a Statement of Non-Compliance within thirty (30) days following a written request by Owner, City shall be deemed to have approved the CC&Rs and Owner may record the CC&Rs against the Property. If the City Attorney provides a Statement of Non -Compliance, Owner shall have thirty (30) days in which to respond to the 421

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 17 of 33

Statement of Non-Compliance. Upon submittal of Owner’s response, the procedure described above for the initial submittal and City Attorney review of proposed CC&Rs shall again be followed. This procedure shall be followed until Owner either (1) receives CC&R Ap proval, (2) submits the compliance issues to binding arbitration pursuant to the rules of the American Arbitration Association, (3) files an action for declaratory relief in Orange County Superior Court seeking a judicial determination of the compliance of the proposed CC&Rs, or (4) an agreement is otherwise reached between the Parties allowing for the recording of the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs may run with the land and bind Owner’s successors and assigns.

Except as provided above, any dispute between the Parties regarding the City’s approval or rejection of the CC&Rs shall be subject to immediate and binding arbitration pursuant to the rules of the American Arbitration Association.

4. PROJECT BENEFITS & COMMITMENTS

4.1 Public Benefits. The Project will serve to redevelop an industrial site, will provide on-site infrastructure upgrades; and will provide additional housing opportunities to residents of the City. In addition, the Project will improve the City’s open space and recreational facilities by providing the following:

4.1.1 Public Open Space . The Project will include the construction, ongoing maintenance and management of a 1.5-acre passive open space area that will be made available to the general public through dedication of a perpetual public access easement to the CITY, which easement shall run with the land in perpetuity and be recorded against the Property in a form and manner approved by the CITY;

4.1.2 Community Center . The Project will also include construction, ongoing maintenance and management of a 1,500-square-foot community room located in Building B that will be made available for use to the CITY at no cost and to the general public subject to the same cost and schedule availability applicable to Project residents (subject to commercially reasonable rules regar ding access, insurance requirements, security, etc.,);

4.1.3 Sunflower Avenue Improvements. The Project will include off-site improvements to Sunflower Avenue that would include, but not be limited to, wider pedestrian sidewalks, street furniture, lighting, wayfinding and public art, pedestrian signal, pedestrian and bike crossings, improved bicycle lanes (beyond the Class II facilities required along the Project frontage) with identification and separation from vehicles, new landscaped street median pockets, an d striped on-street parking along the south side of Sunflower Avenue;

4.1.4 Maintenance of Off-Site Improvements. The CITY will maintain pavement, curb and gutter; the OWNER is to maintain offsite landscaping, irrigation and other features;

4.1.5 Advancement of Development Impact Fees. OWNER shall pay all development impact fees identified in Section 4.3 to the CITY , fees shall be paid in two installments with deferred fees subject to a three percent (3%) interest rate. The first payment shall be received with the issuance of the first building permit (Year 1), the second and final payment received no later than five years from the date of the first issuance building permit “Construction Date” prior to the issuance of the first building permit;

4.1.6 Funding for Public Safety. prior to issuance of first building permit OWNER shall pay to CITY the sum of two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) to be used, in the City’s sole and absolute discretion, to enhance the operations of the CITY’s Police and Fire departments, including, but not limited 422

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 18 of 33

to updates to the firing range, replacement Fire apparatus, and other public safety related projects and/or expenses;

4.1.7 Funding for Community Infrastructure Improvements . Prior to issuance of first building permit OWNER shall pay to CITY t he sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) to be used, in the City’s sole and absolute discretion, to be used toward City-wide roadway and trail improvements (e.g.

Adams Avenue improvements and Citywide bike trail improvements);

4.1.8 Economic Recovery and Community Enhancement Fund. prior to issuance of first building permit No later than five years from the date of the first issuance building permit “Construction Date”, the OWNER shall pay to CITY the sum of three million dollars ( $3,000,000.00) plus the Interest Charge, being a three percent (3%) interest rate, to be used by the City, in its sole and absolute discretion, to assist community enhancement programs and projects related to economic sustainability and recovery, and/or to support essential gover nmental functions impacted during states of emergency and/or recovery therefrom, and/or other community enhancement efforts such as park and open space acquisition, rehabilitation, refurbishment or enhancement (e.g. Shalimar Community Center, Ketchum-Libolt park improvements, etc.).

4.1.9 Gisler Avenue/Garfield Avenue Bridge . OWNER agrees to support CITY’s objections to and actions to remove the planned Gisler/Garfield Avenue Santa Ana River crossing from the OCTA’s Master Plan of Arterial Highways (“OCMPAH”).

4.2 Affordable Housing. It is the intent of CITY to consider and adopt a citywide affordable housing program to require the inclusion of affordable housing, or fees in-lieu thereof, in conjunction with all new residential development. The Project shall provide one hundred six (106) of its units at rates that are affordable to lower-income families; of the total units, sixty-seven (67) units shall be reserved for very low-income and thirty-nine (39) units for low-income tenants. The Project shall not satisfy this requirement by payment of fees in-lieu thereof. The provisions of this Section 4.2 shall continue to apply in the event of a condominium conversion.

Affordable units shall be deed restricted in a form approved by the Director and maintained in for a period of not less than forty (40) years from the date of the last certificate of occupancy of the Project at the affordability levels described in this section. Such units shall be evenly distributed throughout the Project and shall be identical to all other similarly sized units at the Project in terms of design, construction, access and OWNER provided amenities. Construction of affordable units will be proportional throughout the development of the Project, such that a proportional share of affordable un its will be included in each phase of development, i.e., if the first phase of the Project is 25% of the total residential units, then approximately 25% of the total affordable units must be completed in that first phase, etc. In addition, the sizes of the affordable units shall be proportionate to the sizes of all other units within the Project, i.e., if the Project is comprised of 40% one -bedroom, 50% two -bedroom and 10% three -bedroom, then the bedroom count for the affordable units shall be similarly allocated.

If OWNER determines to record a Final Tract Map and convert the apartment units to condominium units, and notwithstanding any provision of Section 2.5.5 of this Agreement to the contrary, Owner shall either: maintain the residential rental units as rental units at the then current income and affordability levels described in this section; market for sale and thereafter sell the units based on the then current income and affordability levels described in this section; or, if applicable, relocate any and all tenants residing in affordable units under the terms imposed by applicable law and/or the citywide affordable housing program in existence at the time of relocation and sell the former rental units at the then current income and affordability levels described in this section.
423

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 19 of 33

4.3 Development Impact Fees . Unless specified below, the OWNER shall pay all development impact fees identified in this section, and further detailed in Exhibit D, to the CITY.

Fees shall be paid in two installments, Year 1 and by the end of Year 5, with deferred fees subject to a 3% interest rate. The first payment shall be received with the issuance of the first building permit (Year 1), the second and final payment received no later than five years from the date of the first issuance building permit “Construction Date”.

4.3.1 Parkland Impact Fee. Project will be subject to the park impact fee for apartment units at $5,000.00 per unit and shall be paid to the CITY prior to the issuance of the first building permit .

The project includes a subdivision for condominium purposes that OWNER indicates may or may not be exercised. Should the OWNER determine to record a Final Tract Map and convert the apartment units to condominium units, OWNER shall pay the difference in fees between the initial $5,000.00 per unit park impact fee and the fee in place at the time of Map recordation for condominium units. The Tentative Tract Map shall remain valid for the term of this agreement and expire coterminous with this agreement if not exercised.

4.3.2 Traffic Impact Fee . The Project will be subject to the traffic impact fee for all additional vehicle trips generated by the Project at the rate in place at the time of approval of the Project (currently two hundred thirty -five dollars ( $235.00) per additional vehicle trip) and shall be paid to the CITY prior to the issuance of the first building permit. The Project will generate a total net increase of six thousand eight hundred (6,800) vehicle trips.

4.3.3 Open Space and Public Park Impact Fee (Measure Z). The Project is subject to the Open Space and Public Park Impact Fee (also known as Measure Z) at the fee established by Resolution of the City Council at the time of issuance of the first building permit up to $1.50 per square foot. The fee shall be paid to the CITY prior to the issuance of the first building permit.

4.3.4 Fire Protection System Development Impact Fee. The intent of the parties is that the Project shall be subject to the most current Fire Protection System Development Impact Fee.

Accordingly, the Project is subject to a Fire Protection System Development Impact fee in an amount calculated to be the equivalent of the North Costa Mesa Fire Fee study; provided, however, that if a new citywide Fire Protection System Development Impact Fee study is adopted after issuance of first building permit, the Project shall then be subject to this new fee.

4.3.5 Time of Payment. Except as described in Subsection 4.3, the fees required shall be paid to CITY as specified in Exhibit D. All Development Impact Fees required shall be paid to CITY in accordance with the terms of the implementing ordinance(s), as detailed in Exhibit D, and according to the following schedule:
(i) for Building A, prior to the issuance of the first building permit; (ii) for Building B, Building C and the Office Building, at the end of Year 5, plus the three percent (3%) Interest Charge, following the Construction Date.

4.4 Dedication of On-Site Easements and Rights of Way. OWNER shall dedicate to CITY all on-site rights of way and easements deemed necessary for public improvements, in CITY's sole discretion, within 15 days of receipt of written demand from CITY.

5. FINANCING OF IMPROVEMENTS. If deemed appropriate by CITY, CITY and OWNER shall cooperate in the formation of any special assessment distr ict, community facilities district or alternate financing mechanism to pay for the construction and/or maintenance and operation of public or private 424

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 20 of 33

improvements required as part of the Development Plan and/or payment of any Development Impact Fees.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, for the purposes of this paragraph, included within the definition of public improvements are street improvements, sewer improvements, drainage improvements, water improvements, other utility improvements, park improvements, trail improvements, pedestrian or bicycle improvements and open space. To the extent any such district or other financing entity is formed and sells bonds in order to finance such reimbursements, OWNER may be reimbursed to the extent that OWNER spends funds or dedicates land for the establishment of public improvements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is acknowledged and agreed by the parties that nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring CITY or the City Council to form any such district or to issue and sell bonds.

6. REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE.

6.1 Periodic Review . The CITY may review this Agreement annually, on or before the anniversary of the Effective Date, in or der to ascertain the compliance by OWNER with the terms of the Agreement. OWNER shall submit an Annual Monitoring Report, in a form acceptable to the Director, within thirty (3 0) days after written notice from the CITY. The Annual Monitoring Report shall be accompanied by an annual review and administration fee sufficient to defray the estimated costs of review and administration of the Agreement during the succeeding year. The amount of the annual review and administration fee shall be set annually by resolution of the City Council.

6.2 Special Review. The City Co uncil may order a special review of compliance with this Agreement at any time. The Director, or his or her designee, shall conduct such special reviews.

6.3 Procedure.
(a) During either a periodic review or a special review, OWNER shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the Agreement. The burden of proof on this issue shall be on OWNER.
(b) Upon completion of a periodic review or a special review, the Director, or his or her designee, may submit a report to the Planning Commission setting forth the evidence concerning good faith compliance by OWNER with the terms of this Agreement and his or her recommended finding on that issue.
(c) If the Planning Commission finds and determines on the basis of substantial evidence that OWNER has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the review shall be concluded.
(d) If the Planning Commission finds and determines on the basis of substantial evidence that OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Commission may recommend to the City Council modification or termination of this Agreement.

Notice of default as provided under Section 7.3 of this Agreement shall be given to OWNER prior to or concurrent with proceedings under Section 6.4 and Section 6.5.

6.4 Proceedings Upon Modification or Termination. If, upon a finding under Section 6.3, CITY determines to proceed with modification or termination of this Agreement, CITY shall give written notice to OWNER of its intention so to do. The notice shall be given at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the scheduled hearing and shall contain:
(a) The time and place of the hearing;
425

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 21 of 33

(b) A statement as to whether or not CITY proposes to terminate or to modify the Agreement; and,
(c) Such other information that the CITY considers necessary to inform OWNER of the nature of the proceeding.

6.5 Hearing on Modification or Termination . At the time and place set for the hearing on modification or termination, OWNER shall be given an opportunity to be heard. OWNER shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the ter ms and conditions of this Agreement. The burden of proof on this issue shall be on OWNER. If the City Council finds, based upon substantial evidence, that OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms or conditions of the Agreement, the City Council may terminate this Agreement or modify this Agreement and impose such conditions as are reasonably necessary to protect the interests of the CITY. The decision of the City Council shall be final.

6.6 Certificate of Agreement Compliance. If, at the conclusion of a Periodic or Special Review, OWNER is found to be in compliance with this Agreement, CITY shall, upon request by OWNER, issue a Certificate of Agreement Compliance (“Certificate”) to OWNER stating that after the most recent Periodic or Special Review and based upon the information known or made known to the Director and City Council that: (1) this Agreement remains in effect ; and (2) OWNER is not in default. The Certificate shall be in recordable form, shall contain information necessary to communicate constructive record notice of the finding of compliance, shall state whether the Certificate is issued after a Periodic or Special Review and shall state the anticipated date of commencement of the next Periodic Review. OWNER may record the Certificate with the County Recorder.

Whether or not the Certificate is relied upon by assignees or other transferees or OWNER, CITY shall not be bound by a Certificate if a default existed at the time of the Periodic or Special Review, but was concealed from or otherwise not known to the Director or City Council.

7. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES.

7.1 Remedies in General . It is acknowledged by the P arties that neither CITY nor OWNER would have entered into this Agreement if either were to be liable in damag es under this Agreement, or with respect to this Agreement or the application thereof. In general, each of the parties hereto may pursue any remedy at law or equity available for the breach of any provision of this Agreement, except damages.

7.2 Release. Except for non -monetary remedies, OWNER, for itself, its successors and assignees, hereby releases CITY, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, actions, or suits of any kind or nature arising out of any liability, known or unkno wn, present or future, including, but not limited to, any claim or liability, based or asserted, pursuant to Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution, the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, or any other law or or dinance which seeks to impose any other liability or damage, whatsoever, upon CITY because it entered into this Agreement or because of the terms of this Agreement. OWNER hereby acknowledges that it has read and is familiar with the provisions of Californ ia Civil Code Section 1542, which is set forth below:
“A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE

CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR

AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR

HER MUST HAVE MATERIA LLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.”
426

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 22 of 33

By initialing below, OWNER hereby waives the provisions of Section 1542 in connection with the matters that are the subject of the foregoing waivers and releases. _______________
Owner’s Initials

7.3 Termination or Modification of Agreement for Default of OWNER . CITY may terminate or modify this Agreement for any failure of OWNER to perform any material duty or obligation of OWNER under this Agreement, or to comply in good faith with the terms of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "default"); provided, however, CITY may terminate or modify this Agreement pursuant to this Section only after providing written notice to OWNER of default setting forth the nature of the default and the actions, if any, required by OWNER to cure such default and, where the default can be cured, OWNER has failed to take such actions and cure such default within sixty (60) days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such default cannot be cured within such sixty (60) day period but can be cured within a longer time, has as determined by the Director failed to commence the actions necessary to cure such default within such sixty (60) day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and cure such default.

7.4 Termination of Agreement for Default of CITY . OWNER may terminate this Agreement only in the event of a default by CITY in the performance of a material term of this Agr eement and only after providing written notice to CITY of default setting forth the nature of the default and the actions, if any, required by CITY to cure such default and, where the default can be cured, CITY has failed to take such actions and cure such default within sixty (60) days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such default cannot be cured within such sixty (60) day period but can be cured within a longer time, has failed to commence the actions necessary to cure such de fault within such sixty (60) day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and cure such default.

8. LITIGATION.

8.1 Third Party Litigation Concerning Agreement . OWNER shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys' fees, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against CITY, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Agreement, or the approval of any permit granted pursuant to th is Agreement.

CITY shall promptly notify OWNER of any claim, action, proceeding or determination included within this Section 8.1, and CITY shall cooperate in the defense. If CITY fails to promptly notify OWNER of any such claim, action, proceeding or determination, or if CITY fails to cooperate in the defense, OWNER shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless CITY. CITY may in its d iscretion participate in the defense of any such claim, action, proceeding or determination.

8.2 Environmental Assurances. OWNER shall indemnify and hold CITY, its officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from any liability, based or asserted, upon a ny act or omission of OWNER, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, predecessors in interest, successors, assigns and independent contractors for any violation of any federal, state or local law, ordinance or regulation relating to industrial hyg iene or to environmental conditions on, under or about the Property, including, but not limited to, soil and groundwater conditions, and OWNER shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys’ fees, CITY, its officers, agents and employees in any action based or asserted upon any such alleged act or omission. CITY may in its discretion participate in the defense of any such action.

8.3 Reservation of Rights. With respect to Section 8.1 and Section 8.2 herein, CITY reserves, the right to either (1) approve the attorney(s) that the indemnifying party selects, hires or otherwise engages to defend the indemnified party hereunder, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, or (2) 427

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 23 of 33

conduct its own defense; provided, however, that the indemnifying party shall reimburse the indemnified party forthwith for any and all reasonable expenses incurred for such defense, including attorneys ’ fees, upon billing and accounting therefor.

8.4 Challenge to Existing Land Use Approvals . By accepting the benefits of this Agreement, OWNER, on behalf of itself and its successors in interest, hereby expressly agrees and covenants not to sue or otherwise challenge any land use approval affecting the Property and in effect as of the Effective Date.

Such agreement and covenant includes, without limitation, the covenant against any direct suit by OWNER or its successor in interest, or any participation, encouragement or involvement whatsoever that is adverse to CITY by OWNER or its successor in interest, other than as part of required response to lawful orders of a court or other body of competent jurisdiction. OWNER hereby expressly waives, on behalf of itself and its successors in interest, any claim or challenge to any land use approval affecting the Property and in effect as of the Effective Date. In the event of any breach of the covenant or waiver contained herein, CITY shall, in addition to any other remedies provided for at law or in equity, be entitled to:
(a) impose and recover (at any time, including after sale to a member of the public or other ultimate user) from the party breaching such covenant or waiver, the full amount of Development Impact Fees that the breaching party would have been required to pay in the absence of this Development Agreement; and
(b) impose any subsequently adopted land use regulation on those land use approvals for which the breaching party had not, as of the time of such breach, obtained a building permit.

OWNER hereby acknow ledges that it has read and is familiar with the provisions of California Civil Code Section 1542, which is set forth below:
“A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE

CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR

AT THE TIME O F EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR

HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.”
By initialing below, OWNER hereby waives the provisions of Section 1542 in connection with the matters that are the subject of the foregoing waivers and releases. _______________
Owner’s Initials

8.5 Survival. The provisions of Sections 8.1 through 8.4, inclusive, shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

9. MORTGAGEE PROTECTION.

The parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit OWNER, in any manner, at OWNER's sole discretion, from encumbering the Property or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any mortgage, deed of trust or other security devic e securing financing with respect to the Property. CITY acknowledges that the lenders providing such financing may require certain Agreement interpretations and modifications and agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with OWNER and representatives of such lenders to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or modification.

CITY will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested interpretation or modification 428

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 24 of 33

provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with the intent and purposes of this Agreement.

Any Mortgagee of the Property shall be entitled to the following rights and privileges:
(a) Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any mortgage on the Property made in good faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law.
(b) The Mortgagee of any mortgage or deed of trust encumbering the Property, or any part thereof, which Mortgagee, has submitted a request in writing to the CITY in the manner specified herein for giving notices, shall be entitled to receive written notification from CITY of any default by OWNER in the performance of OWNER's obligations under this Agreement. (c) If CITY timely receives a request from a mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given to OWNER under the terms of this Agreement, CITY shall provide a copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of sending the notice of default to OWNER. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure the default during the remaining cure period allowed such party under this Agreement.
(d) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Property, or any part thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the mortgage or deed of trust, or deed in lieu of such foreclosure, shall take the Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, no Mortgagee shall have an obligation or duty under this Agreement to perform any of OWNER's obligations or other affirmative covenants of OWNER hereunder, or to guarantee such performance; provided, however, that to the extent that any covenant to be performed by OWNER is a condition precedent to the performance of a covenant by CITY, the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to CITY's performance hereunder, and further provided that any sale, transfer or assignment by any Mortgagee in possession shall be subject to the provisions of Section 2.5 of this Agreement.

10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

10.1 Recordation of Agreement . This Agreement and any amendment or cancellation thereof shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder by the Clerk of the City Council w ithin ten (10) days after the City enters into the Agreement, in accordance with Section 65868.5 of the Government Code. If the parties to this Agreement or their successors in interest amend or cancel this Agreement, or if the CITY terminates or modifies this Agreement as provided herein for failure of the OWNER to comply in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the City Clerk shall have notice of such action recorded with the Orange County Recorder.

10.2 Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire understanding and agreement of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements that are not contained or expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement.

10.3 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be determined invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform taking into consideration the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provision of the Project Benefits & Commitments set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement, including the payment of the Development Impact Fees set forth therein, are essential elements of this Agreement and CITY would not have entered into this 429

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 25 of 33

Agreement but for such provisions, and therefore in the event any such provision is determined to be invalid, void or unenforceable, this entire Agreement shall be null and void and of no force and effect whatsoever.

10.4 Interpretation and Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives and purposes of the parties hereto, and the rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement, all par ties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation hereof.

10.5 Section Headings. All section headings and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement.

10.6 Singular and Plural. As used herein, the singular of any word includes the plural.

10.7 Joint and Several Obligations. If at any time during the Term of this Agreement the Property is owned, in whole or in part, by more than one OWNER, all obligations of such OWNERS u nder this Agreement shall be joint and several, and the default of any such OWNER shall be the default of all such OWNERS. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no OWNER of a single lot that has been finally subdivided and sold to such OWNER as a member of the g eneral public or otherwise as an ultimate user shall have any obligation under this Agreement except as expressly provided for herein.

10.8 Time of Essence . Time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement as to which time is an element.

10.9 Waiver. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party, or the failure by a party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such party's right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter.

10.10 No Third Party Beneficiaries . This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the parties and their successors and assigns. No other person shall have any right of action based upon any provision of this Agreement.

10.11 Force Majeure. Neither party shall be deemed to be in default where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused by floods, earthquakes, other Acts of God, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, strikes and other labor difficulties beyond the party's control, (including the party's employment force), government regulations, court actions and pendin g litigation (such as lawsuits seeking to overturn the project approvals, restraining orders or injunctions), or other causes beyond the party's control. If any such events shall occur, the Term of this Agreement and the time for performance by either part y of any of its obligations hereunder may be extended by the written agreement of the parties for the period of time that such events prevented such performance, provided that the Term of this Agreement shall not be extended under any circumstances for more than five (5) years.

10.12 Mutual Covenants . The covenants contained herein are mutual covenants and also constitute conditions to the concurrent or subsequent p erformance by the party benefit ed thereby of the covenants to be performed hereunder by such benefited party.

10.13 Successors in Interest . The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the parties to this Agreement. All provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running 430

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 26 of 33

with the land. Each covenant to do or refrain from doing some act hereunder with regard to development of the Property: (a) is for the benefit of and is a burden upon every portion of the Property; (b) runs with the Property and each portion thereof; and (c) is binding upon each party and each successor in interest during ownership of the Property or any portion thereof.

10.14 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the parties in counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all of the parties had executed the same instrument.

10.15 Jurisdiction and Venue . Any action at law or in equity ari sing under this Agreement or brought by a party hereto for the purpose of enforcing, construing or determining the validity of any provision of this Agreement shall be filed and tried in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, and the parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the filing, removal or change of venue to any other court.

10.16 Project as a Private Undertaking. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the development of the Project is a private development, that neither party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this Agreement. The only relationship between CITY and OWNER is that of a government entity regulating the development of private property and the owner of such property.

10.17 Further Actions and Instruments . Each of the parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Agreement. Upon the request of either party at any time, the other party shall promptly execute and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary under the terms of this Agreement to carry out the intent and to fulfill the provisions of this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

10.18 Eminent Domain. No provision of this Agreement shall be construed to limit or restrict the exercise by CITY of its power of eminent domain.

10.19 Agent for Service of Process . In the event OWNER is not a resident of the State of California or it is an association, partnership or joint venture without a member, partner or joint venturer resident of the State of California, or it is a foreign corporation, then in any such event, OWNER shall file with the Director and the City Clerk, upon its execution of this Agreement, a designation of a natural person residing in the State of California, giving his or her name, residence and business addresses, as its agent for the purpose of service of process in any court action arising out of or based upon this Agreement, and the delivery to such agent of a copy of any process in any such action shall constitute valid service upon OWNER. If for any reason service of such process upon such agent is not feasible, then in such event OWNER may be personally served with such process and such service shall constitute valid service upon OWNER. OWNER is amenable to the process so served, submits to the jurisdiction of the Court so obtained and waives any and all objections and protests thereto.

10.20 Authority to Execute . The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of OWNER warrants and represents that he or she/they have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his or her/their corporation, partnership or business entity and warrants and represents that he or she/they has/have the authority to bind OWNER to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 431

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 27 of 33

[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

432

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 28 of 33

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Development Agreement on the last day and year set forth below.

OWNER

Rose Equities, as authorized signatory for
International Asset Management Holding Group,
LLC

____________________________________ Dated: _______________ Rose Equities
By: Brent Stoll, Partner

CITY

CITY OF COSTA MESA, a California municipal
corporation

_________________________________ Dated: _______________ John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST

_________________________________ Dated: _______________ Brenda Green, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM

_________________________________ Dated: _______________ Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

433

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 29 of 33

EXHIBIT “A”

(Legal Description of the Property)

Parcel 1, in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on map filed in Book 73, Pages 11 and 12 of Parcels Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. APN: 13-031-62 and 139-651-14
434

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 30 of 33

EXHIBIT “B”

(Map of the Property)

435

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 31 of 33

EXHIBIT “C”

(Development Plan)

General Plan Amendment No. 20-01
Specific Plan No. 20-01
Zone Change No. 20-01
Tract Map No. 19015
Master Plan No. 19-19
436

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 32 of 33

EXHIBIT “D”

(Development Impact Fees)

CITY OF COSTA MESA DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Fee Type Fee Amount Time of Payment
Park Impact Fee $5,000 per unit Apartment Project: Prior to the issuance of the first building permit
Condominium Project: Prior to Final
Tract Map approval, payment for the
difference in fees between the initial
$5,000.00 per unit park impact fee
and the fee in place at the time of
Map recordation for condominium
units
Traffic Impact Fee $235 for additional trips Prior to the issuance of the first building permit; The
project will generate a total of
6,800 vehicle trips
Open Space and Public
Park Impact Fee (Measure
Z)
$1.50 per SF per City Council
Resolution 17-19
Prior to issuance of the first building
permit
Fire Protection System
Development Impact Fee
Equivalent to North Costa Mesa
Specific Plan ($0.28 per square
foot of new development and
$469.35 per new residential unit)
or fee in effect as a result of a new
citywide fire fee study
Prior to issuance of the first building
permit
Drainage Fees Fees effective at the time of
building permit issuance (currently
$5,026.00 per acre)
Prior to issuance of the first building
permit issuance

437

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 33 of 33

CITY OF COSTA MESA DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Fee Type Fee Amount Time of Payment
Park Impact Fee $5,000 per unit Condominium Project: Prior to Final Tract Map approval,
payment for the difference in fees
between the initial $5,000.00 per
unit park impact fee and the fee in
place at the time of Map
recordation for condominium units
Apartment Project: shall be paid in
two installments with deferred fees
subject to a 3% interest rate as
stated below

Traffic Impact Fee $235 for additional trips
The project will generate a total
of 6,800 vehicle trips
Development Fees shall be paid in
two installments with deferred fees
subject to a 3% interest rate. The
first payment shall be received with
the issuance of the first building
permit (Year 1), the second and
final payment received by no later
than five years from the date of the
first issuance building permit
“Construction Date”.

Open Space and Public
Park Impact Fee
(Measure Z)
$1.50 per SF per City Council
Resolution 17-19
Fire Protection System
Development Impact Fee
Equivalent to North Costa Mesa
Specific Plan ($0.28 per square
foot of new development and
$469.35 per new residential unit)
or fee in effect as a result of a
new citywide fire fee study
Drainage Fees Fees effective at the time of
building permit issuance
(currently $5,026.00 per acre)

OTHER AGENCY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Newport-Mesa Unified
School District
Fees effective at the time of building
permit issuance (currently 1.84 per SF)
Payment of non-city fees are
required prior to building
permit issuance or as
otherwise required by the
implementing agency.

Costa Mesa Sanitary
District
Plan check and permit fees effective at
the time of building permit issuance
Mesa Water District Plan check and permit fees effective at the time of building permit issuance
San Joaquin Hills
Transportation
Corridor Fees
Fees effective at the time of building
permit issuance (currently $2,664 for
multi-family)

438

Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 1 of 8

ORDINANCE NO. 2024-xx

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA APPROVING REZONE 20 -01 TO REZONE A 15.23 -ACRE SITE TO PLANNED

DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL-HIGH DENSITY (PDR-HD) AND ESTABLISH A SITE- SPECIFIC DENSITY OF 80 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE AND MAXIMUM 1,057 UNITS FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1683 SUNFLOWER AVENUE

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA , CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY FIND AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, an application was filed by Brent Stoll of Rose Equities, representing the property owners, requesting approval of certain land use entitlements; WHEREAS, duly noticed public hearing s were held by the Planning Commission on April 13, and May 11, 2020 with all persons having the opportunity to speak for and against the proposal;
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 11, 2020, the Planning Commission recommended that City Cou ncil approve the project by a 6 -1 vote (Commissioner Zich voting No);
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on June 15, 2021 with all persons having the opportunity to speak for and against the proposal; WHEREAS, on June 15, 2021, the City Council approved the first reading by a 5- 1 vote (Councilmember Harper voting no and Councilmember Harlan recusing); WHEREAS, the City Council took the following actions by separate resolution;

1. CERTIFY the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2019050014) including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program , Finding of Facts and Statement of Overriding Consideration;

2. APPROVE General Plan Amendment GP-20-01 to change the land use designation of the project site from Industrial Park (IP) to High Density Residential (HDR) with a site -specific density of 80 du/acre and maximum of 1,057 units;

3. APPROVE Master Plan PA-19-19 for a mi xed use development with 1,057 residential units, 6 ,000 square feet of commercial space and 25,000 square feet of office development;
ATTACHMENT 2

439
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 2 of 8

4. APPROVE Tentative Tract Map No. 19105 (T -19-01) for future subdivision of the subject property including establishing the right to a future airspace subdivision for condominium purposes;

5. APPROVE Development Agreement DA-20-02 by adopting a separate ordinance; and,

6. APPROVE Specific Plan SP-20-01 by adopting a separate ordinance; WHEREAS, on July 20, 2021, the City Council approved the second reading by a 5-1 vote (Councilmember Harper voting no and Councilmember Harlan recusing); WHEREAS, on July 20, 2021, the proposed project required the approval by the electorate and the effect ive date of Ordinance 2021 -12 stated that the “Ordinance shall become effective following approval of the Project by the electorate at the regular municipal election or at a special election funded by the applicant”; WHEREAS, on November 8, 2022, “ Measure K” was passed by the Costa Mesa voters, amending Article 22, of the Costa Mesa Zoning Code, modifying regulations to allow for the development of housing in specific commercial and industrial areas while keeping residential neighborhoods intact and revita lizing commercial corridors without a vote by the electorate;
WHEREAS, the subject project is located at 1683 Sunflower Avenue which is located within the Measure K boundaries and no longer requires approval by the electorate;
WHEREAS, the applicant and property owner, International Asset Management Holding Group, LLC, by their authorized agent Brent Stoll with Rose Equities, requested to amend the Ordinances to be consistent with Costa Mesa Zoning Code, Article 22, eliminating the electoral vote requirement;
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2024, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission, after taking public testimony, recommended that the City Council approve the requested amendment;
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on June 4, 2024, with all persons having the opportunity to speak for and against the proposal; WHEREAS, on June 4, 2024, the City Council introduced for first reading and gave first reading to the Ordinance by a x-x vote;
440
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 3 of 8

WHEREAS, t he previously approved general plan amendment re-designated the land use from Industrial Park to High Density Residential in order to allow residential use with a site-specific density and building height. To ensure consistency between the General Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map, the property is rezoned from Industrial Park (MP) to Planned Development Residential – High Density (PDR-HD); WHEREAS, PDR-HD districts are intended for multi-family residential developments and complementary non -residential uses within a planned development. As such, the proposed zoning district would allow a mix of residential and non-residential uses; WHEREAS, the project includes a specific plan adopted with a separate ordinance to allow site-specific development standards (density, building setbacks, open space, land use matrix, parking). The Specific Plan would act as the project’s zoning regulations. Future development of on-site and off-site improvements would be required to comp ly with the Specific Plan development standards and design guidelines – thus, the rezone would be consistent with the Zoning Code, General Plan, and Specific Plan; WHEREAS, a rezone is a legislative action subject to the discretionary approval of the final decision body, City Council. The One Metro West Specific Plan establishes the development’s land use plan, development standards, regulations, design guidelines, infrastructure systems, and implementation strategies on which subsequent, project-related development activities would be founded. Upon adoption of the Specific Plan, subsequent project-specific architectural plans, detailed site plans, grading and building permits, and any other actions requiring either ministerial or discretionary approvals would be required to demonstrate consistency with the Specific Plan;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared by the City in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and certified by the City Council on May 4, 2021 by Resolution No. 2021-54;
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 the proposed amendments are in substantial conformance with the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the One Metro project ( State Clearing House No. 2019050014 ), including a mitigation monitoring program and statement of overriding consideration s, which was 441
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 4 of 8

certified by the City Council on May 4, 2021, and that no further environmental review under CEQA is required; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

Now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA , CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: Rezone. The City of Costa Mesa Official Zoning Map is hereby amended as follows:

1. The proposed rezone to Planned Development Residential -High Density (PDR - HD) with a site-specific density of 80 dwelling units per acre and maximum 1,057 units consistent with the General Plan as amended by General Plan Amendment 20-02 and adopted by Resolution No. 2021-55.

2. There is hereby placed and included in the Planned Development Residential - High Density (PDR-HD) zoning district a 15.23-acre parcel, situated in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California.

3. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 13 -22 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, the Official Zoning Map of the City of Costa Mesa is hereby amended by the change of zone described in Subsections Number 1 and Number 2 above. A copy of the Official Zoning Map and Zoning Code is on file in the office of the Planning Division.

Section 2:

Inconsistencies. Any provision of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and or further, is hereby repealed or modified to the extent necessary to affect the provisions of this ordinance.

Section 3: Severability. If any provision or clause of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or clauses or applications of this ordinance which can be implemented without the invalid provision, c lause or application; and to this end, the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable.
442
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 5 of 8

Section 4: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the 31st day after adoption.

Section 5: Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of _______________ 2024.

__________________________
John Stephens
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa

ATTEST:

___________________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________
Kimberly Hall Barlow
City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 2024-xx was duly introduced for first reading 443
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 6 of 8

at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day of June 2024, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ___ day of _________, 2024, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this ___ day of ___________, 2024.

__________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

444
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 7 of 8

EXHIBIT A

REZONE R-20-01

Amendment to the Zoning Map

Change the zoning district designation of the 15.23-acre site at 1683 Sunflower Avenue from Industrial Park (MP) to Planned Development Residential - High Density (PDR-HD)

445
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 8 of 8

EXHIBIT B
Amendment to Table 13-58
Update Table 13-58 to note the site-specific density for the One Metro West project (text changes shown in bold font below)

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARD PDR-LD PDR-MD PDR-HD PDR-

NCM PDC PDI
Maximum Density
per section 13-59

MAXIMUM

DENSITY
CRITERIA.
(dwelling units per
acre)
8 12
20 Note: See North Costa
Mesa Specific Plan for
exceptions.

Note: The maximum
density for 125 East
Baker Street is 58
dwelling units per acre
(C0-13-02).

Note: The maximum
density for 2277 Harbor
Boulevard is 54
dwelling units per acre
(C0-14-02).

Note: The maximum
density for 1683
Sunflower Avenue is
80 dwelling units per
acre (R-20-01) and
maximum 1,057 units
35 20
Note: The maximum
density for 1901
Newport Boulevard is
40 dwelling units per
acre. See North Costa
Mesa Specific Plan for
exceptions. Note: No
residential
development is
permitted within the

23.4-acre project site
generally addressed
as 1375 Sunflower
Ave. and 3370 Harbor
Blvd.

446
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 1 of 6

ORDINANCE NO. 2024-xx

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 20-01 APPLYING ZONING STANDARDS TO A 15.23 -

ACRE PROPERTY REZONED TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL -HIGH DENSITY (PDR-HD) WITH A SITE-SPECIFIC DENSITY OF 80 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1683 SUNFLOWER AVENUE

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA , CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY FIND AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, an application was filed by Brent Stoll of Rose Equities, representing the property owners, requesting approval of certain land use entitlements; WHEREAS, duly noticed public hearing s were held by the Planning Commission on April 13, 2020 and May 11, 2020 with all persons having the opportunity to sp eak for and against the proposal;
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 11, 2020 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended that City Cou ncil approve the project by a 6 -1 vote (Commissioner Zich voting No);
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on June 15, 2021 with all persons having the opportunity to speak for and against the proposal; WHEREAS, on June 15, 2021, the City Council approved the first reading by a 5- 1 vote (Councilmember Harper voting no and Councilmember Harlan recusing); WHEREAS, on July 20, 2021, the City Council approved the second reading by a 5-1 vote (Councilmember Harper voting no and Councilmember Harlan recusing); and WHEREAS, the City Council took or will take the following actions by separate resolution;

1. CERTIFY the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2019050014) including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program;

2. APPROVE General Plan Amendment GP-20-01 to change the land use designation of the project site from Industrial Park (IP) to High Density Residential (HDR) with a site -specific density of 80 du/acre with maximum 1,057 units;
ATTACHMENT 3
447
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 2 of 6

3. APPROVE Master Plan PA-19-19 for a mixed -use development with 1,057 residential units, 6 ,000 square feet of commercial space and 25,000 square feet of office development;

4. APPROVE Tentative Tract Map No. 19105 (T-19-01) for future subdivision of the subject property including establishing the right to a future airspace subdivision for condominium purposes;

5. APPROVE Development Agreement DA-20-02 by introduction of a separate ordinance;

6. APPROVE Rezone R-20-01 by introduction of a separate ordinance; and

7. APPROVE Specific Plan 20-01 by introduction of a separate ordinance.

WHEREAS, on July 20, 2021, the proposed project required the approval by the electorate and the effective date of Ordinance 2021 -12 stated that the “Ordinance shall become effective following app roval of the Project by the electorate at the regular municipal election or at a special election funded by the applicant.” WHEREAS, on November 8, 2022, “ Measure K” was passed by the Costa Mesa voters, amending Article 22, of the Costa Mesa Zoning Code, modifying regulations to allow for the development of housing in specific commercial and industrial areas while keeping residential neighborhoods intact and revitalizing commercial corridors without a vote by the electorate.

WHEREAS, the subject project is located at 1683 Sunflower Avenue which is located within the Measure K boundaries and no longer requires approval by the electorate.

WHEREAS, the applicant and property owner , International Asset Management Holding Group, LLC, by their authorized agent Brent Stoll with Rose Equities, requested to amend the Ordinances to be consistent with Costa Mesa Zoning Code, Article 22, eliminating the electoral vote requirement;
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2024, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission, after taking public testimony, recommended that the City Council approve the requested amendment;
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on June 4, 2024, with all persons having the opportunity to speak for and against the proposal; 448
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 3 of 6

WHEREAS, on June 4, 2024, the City Council introduced for first reading and gave first reading to the Ordinance by a x-x vote;
WHEREAS, t he previously approved general plan amendment re-designated the land use from Industrial Park to High Density Residential in order to allow residential use with a site-specific density and building height. To ensure consistency between the General Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map, the property is rezoned from Industrial Park (MP) to Planned Development Residential – High Density (PDR-HD); WHEREAS, PDR-HD districts are intended for multi-family residential developments and complementary non -residential uses within a planned development. As such, the proposed zoning district would allow a mix of residential and non-residential uses; WHEREAS, the project includes a specific plan to allow site -specific development standards (e.g., density, building setbacks, open space, land use matrix, parking); WHEREAS, the Specific Plan would act as the project’s zoning regulations. Future development on-site and off -site improvements would be required to comply with the Specific Plan development standards and design guidelines – thus, the rezone would be consistent with the Zoning Code, General Plan, and Specific Plan; WHEREAS, adoption of a Specific Plan is considered a legislative action subject to the discretionary approval of the City Council;
WHEREAS, the One Metro West Specific Plan establishes the development’s land use plan, development standards, zoning regulations and permitted uses, design guidelines, infrastructure systems, and implementation strategies on which subsequent, project-related development activities would be founded. Upon adoption of the Specific Plan, subsequent project-specific architectural plans, detailed site plans, grading and building permits, and any other actions requiring either ministerial or discretionary approvals would be required to demonstrate consistency with the Specific Plan;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared by the City in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and certified by the City Council on May 4, 2021, by Resolution No. 2021-54;

449
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 4 of 6

WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 the proposed amendments are in substantial conformance with the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the One Metro pro ject ( State Clearing House No. 2019050014 ), including a mitigation monitoring program and statement of overriding consideration s, which was certified by the City Council on May 4, 2021, and that no further environmental review under CEQA is required; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

Now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA , CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: Specific Plan. The City of Costa Mesa by an ordinance a dopts Specific Plan 20-01 for the project area that would be applied as the Zoning document for the area. The One Metro West Specific Plan establishes the development’s land use plan, development standards, zoning regulations and permitted uses, design guidelines, infrastructure systems, and implementation strategies on which subsequent, project-related development activities would be founded.

Section 2: Inconsistencies. Any provision of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and or further, is hereby repealed or modified to the extent necessary to affect the provisions of this ordinance.

Section 3: Severability. If any provision or clause of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity s hall not affect other provisions or clauses or applications of this ordinance which can be implemented without the invalid provision, clause or application; and to this end, the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable.

Section 4: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the 31st day after adoption.

Section 5: Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.

450
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 5 of 6

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ______ day of _______________ 2024.

__________________________
John Stephens
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa

ATTEST:

___________________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________
Kimberly Hall Barlow
City Attorney

451
Ordinance No. 2024-xx Page 6 of 6

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 2024-xx was duly introduced for first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 4th day of June 2024, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ___ day of _________, 2024, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this ___ day of ___________, 2024.

__________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

452
ATTACHMENT 4
Resolution No. 2024-xx Page 1 of 9

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-xx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA ,

CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 2021 -55, ONE METRO WEST DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 1683

SUNFLOWER AVENUE

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA , CALIFORNIA FINDS AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on June 15, 2021, the City Council, at a duly -noticed public hearing, approved a mixed-use development (One Metro West) located at 1683 Sunflower Avenue.

The approvals included:

1. Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2019050014);

2. General Plan Amendment (GP -20-01): Amending the Land Use Element to change the General Plan land use designation of the property from Industrial Park (IP) to High-Density Residential (HDR) to allow residential uses and establish a site- specific maximum density of 80 dwelling units (du) per acre and site-specific maximum building height of 98 feet;

3. Master Plan (PA -19-19): Implementing the Specific Plan and provide site plans and architectural details including floor plans, building elevations, landscaping, and renderings/streetscape views;

4. Tentative Tract Map No. 19015 (T -19-01): Subdividing the site including establishing the right to a future airspace subdivision for condominium purposes as well as dedication of an easement to the City for public access and use of the 1.5 - acre open space; and
Gave first reading to Ordinance Nos. 2021-11, 2021-12, and 2021-13 for:

5. Rezone (R-20-01): Changing the zone of the project site from Industrial Park (MP) to Planned Development Residential – High Density (PDR-HD) to allow for a mixed- use development with residential and commercial uses;

6. Specific Plan (SP -20-01): Establishing site-specific zoning regula tions such as development standards and design guidelines which would function as the project’s zoning document;
453
Resolution No. 2024-xx Page 2 of 9

7. Development Agreement (DA-20-02): Agreement between the applicant and the City pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65864 et seq. T he Agreement guarantees project approvals for a period of 25 years in exchange for several public benefits including, but not limited to, 106 affordable housing units (67 very-low income units and 39 low-income units).

WHEREAS, on July 21, 2021, the City Council gave second reading to and adopted Ordinance Nos. 2021-11, 2021-12, and 2021-13;
WHEREAS, on December 4, 2023, Development Agreement (PDEV-23-0001), One Metro West Project Amendments, was filed by Brent Stoll of Rose Equities, authorized agent for the applicant and property owner, International Asset Management Holding Group, LLC, requesting approval of the following:

1. Amendment to Development Agreement No. 20-02, by amending the timing of payment of impact fees and community benefits funding;

2. Amendment to Ordinance Nos. 2021-11, 2021-12, and 2021-13, by modifying the Ordinances to be consistent with Article 22 by reflecting the project effective date as the date of the City C ouncil Ordinance adoption, and thereby exempting the project from the requirement for a vote of the electorate; and

3. Amendment to Resolution No. 2021 -55, by amending certain conditions of approval related to the artwork design submittal to the City and the final approval body for the proposed artwork (Conditions 9 and 66 of Resolution 2021-55).

WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on May 13, 2024, with all per sons having the opportunity to speak for and against the proposal;
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on June 4, 2024, with all persons having the opportunity to speak for and against the proposal; WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the project was reviewed and found to be consistent with the One Metro West Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2019050014), which was certified on May 4, 2021, by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa (Resolution No. 2021 -54). Pursuant to Section 15162 of the 454
Resolution No. 2024-xx Page 3 of 9

Guidelines, no subsequent environmental review is warranted for the project because there are no substantial changes to the project in that there are no modifications to the approved project plans , or required mitigation measure language that was included to mitigate a project effect; and
WHEREAS, amending City Council approved Resolution No. 2021 -55, Approving General Plan Amendment 20-01, Master Plan 19-19, and Tentative Tract Map No. 19015 (One Metro West), modifying certain conditions of approval related to the required project artwork, is depicted further in Exhibit B.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the evidence in the record and the findings contained in Exhibit A, and modifications as shown in Exhibit B, the City Council hereby finds that the proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan and approves the amendment to the condition of approval for Resolution 2021 -55, pertaining to the public art installation.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Costa Mesa City Council does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon the activity as described in the staff report for PDEV-23-0001 and in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Any approval granted by this resolution shall be subject to review, modification, or revocation if there is a material change that occurs in the operation, or if the applicant fails to comply with any of the conditions of approval. Except to the extent modified by these amendments all prior resolutions and ordinances that have been or will be approved for the project remain in full force and effect for the project site.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if any section, division, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this resolution, or the document in the record in support of this resolution, are for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 2024.

John Stephens
Mayor of the City of Costa Mesa

455
Resolution No. 2024-xx Page 4 of 9

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________ _____________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

456
Resolution No. 2024-xx Page 5 of 9

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original Resolution No. 2024-XX and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 4th day of June, 2024, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 5th day of June, 2024.

_______________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

457
Resolution No. 2024-xx Page 6 of 9

EXHIBIT A

FINDINGS

PDEV 23-0001 is a request to amend certain provisions of Development Agreement DA 20- 02; amend certain conditions of approval of Resolution 2021-55 (Resolution that approved General Plan 20-01, Master Plan 19-19, and Tentative Tract Map 19015), and to clarify the project’s effective date in approved Ordinance Numbers 2021-11, 2021-12, and 2021-13, for the One Metro West project. The requested amendmen ts do not change the previously approved project plans. Therefore , the findings, and facts in support of those findings, contained in the above-mentioned Ordinances and Resolution remain true and in effect. The following findings, and facts in support of those findings, pertain only to the proposed amendments.

A. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR ALL PLANNING APPLICATIONS:

The proposed project complies with Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 13 -29(e), Review Criteria, because:

Finding: Compatible and harmonious relationship between the proposed building and site development, and use(s), and the building and site developments, and uses that exist or have been approved for the general neighborhood.

Facts in Support of Finding: The One Metro West Development was found to have a compatible and harmonious relationship between the proposed building and site development and use(s), and the building and site developments, and uses that exist or have been approved for the general neighborhood at the time of its original approval which remains in effect. The proposed amendments do not change the previously approved project plans or uses and therefore the project remains compatible and harmonious with the general neighborhood.

Finding: Safety and compatibility of the design of buildings, parking area, landscaping, luminaries and other site features which may include functional aspects of the site development such as automobile and pedestrian circulation.

Facts in Support of Finding: The One Metro West Development was found to be safe and compatible in the design of buildings, parking area, landscaping, luminaries, and other site features , including functional aspects of the site development such as automobile and pedestrian circulation , at the time of its original approval, which remains in effect. The proposed amendments do not change the previously approved project plans and therefore the project remains a safe and compatible development.

Finding: Compliance with any performance stan dards as prescribed elsewhere in this Zoning Code.

458
Resolution No. 2024-xx Page 7 of 9

Facts in Support of Finding: A General Plan Amendment (adopted by Resolution 2021-55), and Rezone (adopted by Ordinance No. 2021-12), was adopted by the City Council on July 20, 2021. The approvals permitted a site- specific density of 80 dwelling units per acre, with a maximum of 1,057 dwelling units. The One Metro West development was approved in compliance with these requirements and the proposed amendments do not change the previously approved project plans. Therefore, the project complies with the requirements of the Zoning Code.

Finding: Consistency with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan.

Facts in Support of Finding: A General Plan Amendment (adopted by Resolution 2021-55), and Specific Plan (adopted by Ordinance No. 2021-13), was adopted by the City Council on July 20, 2021. The approvals permitted a site-specific density of 80 dwelling units per acre, with a maximum of 1,057 dwelling units. The One Metro West development was approved in compliance with these requirements and the proposed amendments do not change the previously approved project plans. Therefore, the project complies with the requirements of the General Plan, and the One Metro West Specific Plan.

Finding: The pl anning application is for a project -specific case and is not to be construed to be setting a precedent for future development.

Facts in Support of Finding: This application, PDEV -23-0001, is for amendments to certain provisions and conditions of the previously-approved One Metro West project. The approved project is a mixed -use development with residential, office, retail , and open space use that would replace an existing industrial use , and the proposed amendments do not change the previously approved plans. Any similar future developments would be required to submit planning applications as necessary or required by the Planning Division.

Finding: When more than one (1) planning application is proposed for a single development, the cumulative effect of all the planning applications shall be considered.

Facts in Support of Finding: No substantial changes to the project are proposed in that there are no modifications to the approved project plans or uses. Therefore, no cumulative effect for the planning applications will result.

Finding: For residential developments, consistency with any applicable design guidelines adopted by city council resolution.

Facts in Support of Finding: The One Metro West Specific Plan contains the project’s development standards and design guidelines. The One Metro West development was approved in compliance with these requirements and the 459
Resolution No. 2024-xx Page 8 of 9

proposed amendments do not change the previously approved project plans.

Therefore, the project complies with the requirements of the One Metro West Specific Plan.

Finding: For affordable multi-family housing developments that include a minimum of sixteen (16) affordable dwelling units at no less than twenty (20) dwelling units per acre, the maximum density standards of the general plan shall be applied, and the maximum density shall be permitted by right and not subject to discretionary review during the design review or master plan application process.

Facts in Support of Finding: The approved One Metro West development includes a multi -family residential development. Though the project is not an affordable housing development, there would still be a portion of the overall dwelling units set aside for affordable housing opportunities. T he terms and conditions of the affordable units are included in the p roject’s Development Agreement. The proposed amendments do not change or modify the terms and conditions of the affordable units in the Development Agreement.

B. Pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the project was reviewed and found to be consistent with the One Metro West Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2019050014), which was certified on May 4, 2021, by the City Council of the City of C osta Mesa (Resolution No. 2021 -54). Pursuant to Section 15162 of the Guidelines, no subsequent environmental review is warranted for the project because there are no substantial changes to the project in that there are no modifications to the approved project plans or required mitigation measures.

460
Resolution No. 2024-xx Page 9 of 9

EXHIBIT B

Amendments to certain conditions of approval of Resolution 2021-55

Legend: New text is shown in underlined bold, and the deleted test is shown in strikethrough

Artwork Conditions of Approval

 COA No. 9 – The final design of the public art display on Building A’s parking structure façade along the I-405 Freeway, which shall incorporate vertical landscaping where appropriate as determined by the review bodies, shall be subject to review and final approval by the Planning Commission. The Cultural Arts Commission Committee (CAC) may shall first review the proposed freeway façade design and make recommendations to the Planning Commission. No public art display vi sible along the I-405 Freeway shall be installed without prior review by and approval from the Planning Commission.

 COA No. 66 – Prior to the issuance of the first structural building permit for the proposed project, the owner/developer would be required to submit a Design Plan for the Building “A” parking elevation (façade) along the I-405 Freeway for review by the Planning Division and approval by the City’s Cultural Arts Commission Committee.

All architectural treatments would exclude the use of moving, flashing, or otherwise visually distracting elements or materials that are highly reflective or generate noise. [PPP-AES-1]

461
ATTACHMENT 5
-1-
462
-2-
463
-3-
464
-4-
465
-5-
466
-6-
467
-7-
468
-8-
469
-9-
470
-10-
471
ATTACHMENT 6
472
ATTACHMENT 7
List of Development Agreement Public Benefits:

The One Metro West Development Agreement provides for a number of public benefits for the City, including but not limited to open space, a community center, affordable housing, and funding. The applicant is committed to providing these benefits . The requested modifications pertain only to the timing of payment of certain required fees.

The following list provides a summary of the project benefits and comments as provided by the Development Agre ement. For additional details, please refer to the Draft Development Agreement provided under Exhibit B of the DRAFT Development Agreement Ordinance.

Public Safety:
 $2 million: To be used to benefit local police and fire services (e.g. firing range, replacement fire engine)

Community Infrastructure Improvements:
 $1 million: To be used toward roadway and trail improvements (e.g. Adams Avenue improvements and Citywide bike trail improvements)

Economic Recovery Fund:
 $3 million: To be used to support esse ntial governmental functions following the COVID-19 State of Emergency

Parks/Open Space:
 Required: Payment of Measure Z fees (approximately $2.2 million)  Required: Payment of required Park Fees ($5.3 million)  Public use easement over 1.5-acre public urban open space/park

Other Fees/Improvements:
 Required: Traffic Impact Fees ($1.44 million)
 Payment of Fire Impact Fees (Estimated to be approximately $900,000) (Note:

This fee is based on the existing North Costa Mesa Fire Fee; if adopted, the applicant would be required to participate in a new Citywide fee)  Support of removal of Gisler Avenue/Garfield Avenue bridge from Master Plan of Arterial Highways (Value: No cost)
 Improvements to Sunflower Avenue (wider sidewalks, pedestrian/bicycle improvements, public art, etc.) (Value: $0.5 to $1 million); Applicant and the City will share maintenance (City: pavement and curb/gutter / applicant: landscaping, irrigation, others)
 Public use of the Community Center within the project 473
ATTACHMENT 8
-1-
474
-2-
475
-3-
476
-4-
477
-5-
478
-6-
479
-7-
480
-8-
481
-9-
482
-10-
483
-11-
484
-12-
485
-13-
486
-14-
Included with Attachment No. 1: Draft Ordinance
487
-15-
488
-16-
489
ATTACHMENT 9
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
-1-

PLANNING COMMISSION

AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: May 13, 2024 ITEM NUMBER: PH-2
SUBJECT: PDEV-23-0001, AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS TO ONE METRO WEST DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA-20-02), ORDINANCES AND

RESOLUTIONS
FROM: ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT/

PLANNING DIVISION
PRESENTATION BY: AMBER GREGG, CONTRACT PLANNER

FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION
CONTACT:

AMBER GREGG, CONTRACT PLANNER
714.754.5617
[email protected]
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the requested amendments as detailed in the following report, and adopt a Resolution to:

1. Find pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that the proposed amendments are in substantial conformance with the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the One Metro project (State Clearing House No. 2019050014), including a mitigation monitoring program and statement of overriding considerations, which was certified by the City Council on July 20, 2021, and that no further environmental review under CEQA is required; and

2. Adopt Resolution 2024-XX recommending that the City Council:
 Introduce for first reading an ordinance amending Development Agreement DA-20-02 regarding the timing of payment for impact fees and community benefit funds;
 Introduce for first reading an Ordinance clarifying the project’s effective approval date contained in Development Agreement 20-02, Rezone 20-01 and Specific Plan 20-01; and
 Approve modifications to City Council Resolution 2021-55 amending certain conditions of approval regarding the artwork on Building A along the I-405 Freeway.

ATTACHMENT 10
502
-2-
APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT:

The applicant and property owner is International Asset Management Holding Group, LLC. The authorized agent is Brent Stoll with Rose Equities.

BACKGROUND:

The subject property is 15.23 acres in size and is located at 1683 Sunflower Avenue. The site is bounded by Sunflower Avenue to the north, the South Coast Collection (SOCO) retail center to the east, the Interstate 405 Freeway (I-405 Freeway) to the south, and industrial and logistics uses to the west (zoned PDI, Planned Development Industrial). Regional access to the project site is provided by the I-405 Freeway, State Route 73 (SR-73), and State Route 55 (SR-55). Harbor Boulevard and Sunflower Avenue are the major roadways that provide local access to the site; Hyland Avenue and Cadillac Avenue extend perpendicularly from Sunflower Avenue to the east and west, respectively. The project site is currently occupied by office, warehouse, and manufacturing uses within an approximately 345,000-square-foot, one-story industrial building.

Exhibit 1 – One Metro West Project Vicinity Map
On July 20, 2021, the City Council approved at the subject site the “One Metro West” mixed- use development which includes 1,057 apartment units,6,000 square feet of ground floor retail space, a 25,000 square foot office building, 1.5-acres of publicly accessible open Project Site
503
-3-
space, and various offsite improvements along Sunflower Avenue (e.g., new bicycle lanes and landscaped medians).

When the Council approved the final project entitlements, the project was appropriately conditioned to be subject to Article 22 of the Zoning Code, “An Ordinance to give the People of Costa Mesa Control of Their Future”, also known as “Measure Y.” The provisions of Article 22 require a public vote of Costa Mesa residents to determine major changes in allowable land use by requiring voter approval of any such proposed change and thereby ensuring maximum public participation in major land use and zoning changes proposed in Costa Mesa.

The specific project components that prompted Article 22 compliance included, the request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA), rezone, specific plan, and the determination that the project resulted in a “Significant Increase” because over 40 additional residential units were proposed (Costa Mesa Municipal Code Section 13-200.102.) In addition, the project was not subject to any of the listed exceptions to Article 22 at the time of City Council project consideration (CMMC Section 13-200.106). The development was conditionally approved by the City Council such that the project entitlements would not become effective until approved by the voters under Article 22 requirements.

Following City Council review of the project, Measure K was passed by the Costa Mesa voters. Measure K amended existing City regulations to allow for the development of housing in specific commercial and industrial areas while keeping residential neighborhoods intact and revitalizing commercial corridors. Similar to the surrounding Costa Mesa properties located north of the 405 freeway, the One Metro West project is located within a mapped area that is listed specifically for an allowed exception from Article 22 (CMMC Section 13-200.106 G). However, the project is currently conditioned to not be in effect until approval by the vote of the Costa Mesa electorate and therefore, since a vote of the electorate has not occurred, the One Metro West development entitlements are not effective.

The entitlements approved for the project include:
 Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2019050014)  General Plan Amendment (GP-20-01): When in effect, amending the Land Use Element to change the General Plan land use designation of the property from Industrial Park (IP) to High Density Residential (HDR) to allow residential uses and establish a site-specific maximum density of 80 dwelling units (du) per acre and site-specific maximum building height of 98 feet;
 Rezone (R-20-01): When in effect, changing the zone of the project site from Industrial Park (MP) to Planned Development Residential – High Density (PDR- HD) to allow for a mixed-use development with residential and complementary commercial uses;
504
-4-
 Specific Plan (SP-20-01): When in effect, establishing site-specific zoning regulations such as development standards and design guidelines which would function as the project’s zoning document;
 Master Plan (PA-19-19): When in effect, implementing the specific plan by providing site plans and architectural details including floor plans, building elevations, landscaping, public art requirement and renderings/streetscape views;  Tentative Tract Map No. 19015 (T-19-01): When in effect, subdividing the site into five parcels including establishing the right to a future airspace subdivision for condominium purposes as well as dedication of an easement to the City for public access and use of the 1.5-acre open space area; and
 Development Agreement (DA-20-02): When in effect, agreement between the applicant and the City pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65864 et seq. that guarantees project approvals for a period of 25 years from July 20, 2021, in exchange for several public benefits including, but not limited to, 106 affordable housing units that will remain affordable for no less than 40 years. The required project affordable households include 67 very-low income units and 39 low-income units.

DESCRIPTION:

As noted above, a number of entitlements were approved to implement the One Metro West project when in effect. The applicant, Rose Equities, has requested several modifications including amending the Development Agreement to modify certain provisions of the project entitlements. Specifically, the applicant is requesting to amend the following:
 Development Agreement: Amend the timing of payment of impact fees and community benefits funding;
 Ordinance Modifications: Modify the Ordinances to be consistent with Article 22 by reflecting the project effective date of July 20, 2021, and thereby exempting the project from the requirement for a vote of the electorate; and  Project Condition of Modifications: Amend certain project conditions specific to the required timing of the artwork design submittal to the City and the final approval body for the proposed artwork (Conditions 9 and 66 of Resolution 2021-55).

Refer to the applicant’s letter in Attachment 2 for a detailed description of the applicant’s requests.

ANALYSIS:

Development Agreement Amendment
505
-5-
The One Metro West Development Agreement provides for a number of public benefits for the City, including but not limited to open space, a community center, affordable housing, and funding. The applicant is committed to providing these benefits; however, is requesting modifications to the timing of payment to certain required fees. Currently, the Development Agreement requires all fees ($16,532,789) to be paid in Phase I - at the time of issuance of the first building permit. The applicant has stated the resulting upfront costs are significant and challenging, and instead proposes to pay the total amount in two installments, with interest, over a five-year period (see the below Table 1).

TABLE 1 – Approved and Proposed Development Agreement Language The City’s Finance Department has reviewed the applicant’s requested payment modifications and determined that the requested five-year payment plan with a three- percent interest rate retains the fund's “net present value” by recovering the potential interest and/or inflation monetary reductions that may result by the requested payment delays. The result is a total payment of $17,881,474 at the end of the five-year term. If the proposed payment plan is approved, the resulting payments are as follows:

TABLE 2 – Proposed Fee Total
FEE TYPE YEAR 1 YEAR 5** TOTAL
Public Safety* $2,000,000 - $2,000,000
Comm Infrastructure* $1,000,000 - $1,000,000
Economic Recovery - $3,477,822 $3,477,822
Dev Impact $5,065,089 $6,338,563 $11,403,652
TOTAL $8,065,089 $9,816,385 $17,881,474
*Fee and timing of payment is unchanged from Original Development Agreement. **Interest starts accruing after Year 1 so fees paid Year 5 include the 3% interest rate.

The City has adopted procedures for development agreement “requirements and considerations” pursuant to Resolution No. 88-53. Pursuant to Section 2.4 (a-e) of the Resolution, the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council

APPROVED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Development Impact Fees (DIF):
 All DIFs paid with issuance of the first building
permit
 Total DIF = $10,532,789
Development Impact Fees (DIF) – REQUEST
CHANGE:
 Two Payment Installments plus 3% interest rate.
 First payment received with the issuance of the
first building permit (Year 1), second and final
payment received Year 5.
 Total DIF = $11,403,652 (includes 3% interest
rate)
Funding for Economic Recovery and
Community Enhancement:
 $3 million for projects related to economic
sustainability and recovery
 Paid prior to issuance of first building permit
Funding for Economic Recovery and Community
Enhancement – REQUEST CHANGE:
 One Payment received in Year 5 plus 3% interest
rate.
 Total = $3,477,822 (includes 3% interest rate)
506
-6-
based on certain findings. An analysis regarding the development agreement project findings is provided below in this report.

Project Effective Date - Ordinances and Resolution
The One Metro West development entitlements included two City Council Resolutions and three Ordinances that are currently not in effect. All of these documents referenced the requirement to comply with the Costa Mesa Municipal Code (CMMC) Article 22 (Measure Y), which requires that the One Metro West project entitlements include approval by a vote of the Costa Mesa electorate for the associated major change in allowable land use.

However, following the project review by the City Council, the Costa Mesa electorate passed “Measure K” which modified Article 22 to allow further exceptions which include properties that are mapped in CMMC Figure 13-200-106. The mapped exception area included the One Metro West property.

The One Metro West Resolutions (Nos. 2021-54 and 2021-55) state “subject to the requirement of Measure Y” and the Ordinances (Nos. 2021-11, 2021-12, and 2021-13) all contain a version of the following language regarding the effective date: “This ordinance shall become effective following approval of the Project by the electorate at the next regular municipal election or at a special election funded by the applicant”. With the passing of Measure K, and subsequent amendments to Article 22, the applicant is now requesting that the aforementioned entitlements be revised to indicate that the project effective date is the 31st day after July 20, 2021.

Artwork Conditions of Approval
The One Metro West project includes the development of a parking structure located adjacent to the I-405 freeway. To enhance the façade of the parking structure as viewed from the freeway, the project includes a public art display. The design of the art installment was not known at the time of City Council review and therefore, the project entitlements, when effective, included conditions pertaining to the required review and approval of the art piece. There are two conditions in Resolution 2021-55 addressing the public art requirement:
 COA No. 9 – The final design of the public art display on Building A’s parking structure façade along the I-405 Freeway, which shall incorporate vertical landscaping, shall be subject to review and final approval by the Planning Commission. The Cultural Arts Committee (CAC) may first review the proposed freeway façade design and make recommendations to the Planning Commission. No public art display visible along the I-405 Freeway shall be installed without prior review by and approval from the Planning Commission.
507
-7-
COA No. 66 – Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the proposed project, the owner/developer would be required to submit a Design Plan for the Building “A” parking elevation (façade) along the I-405 Freeway for review by the Planning Division and approval by the City’s Cultural Arts Committee. All architectural treatments would exclude the use of moving, flashing, or otherwise visually distracting elements or materials that are highly reflective or generate noise. [PPP- AES-1]
As conditioned, the applicant believes that requiring the submittal of the art design prior to the issuance of the “first building permit”, along with the requirement to incorporate vertical landscaping, is “restrictive and unnecessarily constrains the creative team to a shortened timeframe when the building to which the art display will be attached won’t be ready to receive the installation until many months later”. As such, the applicant is requesting the following amendments to the conditions:

1. Remove Condition No. 9. Instead, the applicant is requesting that the “final design” be subject to the Planning Divisions and the Arts Commission approval, pursuant to Condition of Approval No. 66. The applicant request would also remove the requirement to install vertical landscaping; and

2. Amend Condition of Approval No. 66 to modify the art design plan submittal date to prior to certificate of occupancy for Building “A”, instead of prior to the “first building permit”.

As indicated above, the project is currently conditioned for the art display to be reviewed by the Cultural Arts Committee with final approval by the Planning Commission (COA No. 9).

However, in 2022, the City Council replaced the Cultural Arts Committee with the City Arts Commission. Therefore, staff believes it is appropriate to amend the project conditions to re-assign the project art review to the now active City Arts Commission. However, the Planning Commission should consider if the project final art design should not be reviewed by the Planning Commission, as requested by the applicant. If the Planning Commission is supportive of the Arts Commission reviewing and approving the art design, then staff recommends striking Condition of Approval No. 9.

Staff does not recommend modifying the intent of Condition of Approval No. 66 as it’s a mitigation measure and the language is taken directly from the Final EIR. Further, staff is not in support of the applicant’s request to delay the submittal of the design plan for the elevation and art to “certificate of occupancy”. Staff believes that such a request would potentially diminish a cohesive art and elevation design, as the applicant’s request would constrain a future art design to a previously constructed facade. In addition, staff believes that there will be adequate time for the applicant to work with an artist to submit both a cohesive elevation and art design prior to issuance of the structural building permit as the structural plans have yet to be submitted. Staff is supportive of replacing the language that states “Cultural Art Committee” with “Arts Commission”. To review the modified Condition please review Exhibit D of the Attached Resolution.

GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONFORMANCE:
508
-8-
The Costa Mesa General Plan establishes the long-range planning and policy direction that preserves the qualities that define the community and guides future change. The One Metro West development included a General Plan Amendment. The General Plan Amendment re-designates the land use from Industrial Park to High Density Residential in order to allow residential uses with a site-specific density and building height. To ensure consistency between the General Plan Land Use Map and the Zoning Map, the property was rezoned from Industrial Park (MP) to Planned Development Residential – High Density (PDR-HD). PDR-HD districts are intended for multi-family residential developments and complementary non-residential uses could also be included in the planned development. Since there are no changes to the approved plans the project remains in conformance with the General Plan and Zoning requirements.

JUSTIFICATIONS FOR APPROVAL:

Pursuant to Title 13, Section 13-29(g), Findings, of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, in order to approve the project, the City Council must find that the evidence presented in the administrative record substantially meets specified findings. The requested amendments do not change the previously approved project plans. Therefore, the findings, and facts in support of those findings, contained in the previously mentioned approving Ordinances and Resolution continue to remain true and in effect. Below are the findings related to the Development Agreement Amendment (for additional details on how the project complies with the required findings please refer to the complete findings included in the attached draft Resolution under Exhibit A):

Amendment to Development Agreement 20-02
Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-53, Development Agreements Procedures and Requirements, and Government Code Section 65865(c), staff recommends approval of the requested amendments, based on the following assessment of facts and findings, which are also reflected in the draft Resolution:
 The Development Agreement between the City of Costa Mesa and Developer is:
o Consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and with the General Plan as a whole; o Compatible with the uses authorized in, and the existing land use regulations prescribed for, the zoning district in which the real property is and will be located; and
o Is in conformity with and will promote public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practice.

The proposed amendment to the Development Agreement would be consistent with the General Plan as the agreement would continue to provide several public benefits to the City, including but not limited to, a total of 106 deed-restricted affordable units at the very low and low-income levels, public access to a 1.5-acre urban open space, and improvements to Sunflower Avenue. In addition, the amendment would still require contributions of funding 509
-9-
(beyond the required development impact fees) for public services such as police and fire, and funding toward economic recovery.
 The Development Agreement between the City of Costa Mesa and Developer will not:
o Be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare; and o Adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values.

The amendment to the Development Agreement would not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the public or adversely affect the orderly development of property. The Development Agreement reflects the development plan for the site and documents the additional public benefits of the project (such as affordable housing, public access to 1.5-acres of open space and funding to improve City infrastructure) agreed to by the applicant in exchange for the right to develop per the project approvals for the term of the Development Agreement.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the project was reviewed and found to be consistent with the One Metro West Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2019050014), which was certified on May 4, 2021, by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa (Resolution No. 2021-54). Pursuant to Section 15162 of the Guidelines, no subsequent environmental review is warranted for the project because there are no substantial changes to the project in that there are no modifications to the approved project plans or required mitigation measures.

ALTERNATIVES:

As an alternative to the recommended actions, the Planning Commission may:

1. Recommend Approval of the project with modifications . The Planning Commission may suggest changes that are necessary to alleviate specific concerns. If any of the additional requested changes are substantial, the item should be continued to a future meeting to allow the applicant and staff time to redesign or provide additional analysis.

In the event of significant modifications to the proposal, staff may return with project analysis that incorporates new findings and/or conditions.

2. Recommend denial of the project. If the Planning Commission believes that there are insufficient facts to support the findings for approval of the very specific requested changes, the Planning Commission could recommend that the City Council deny the application, by providing facts in support of that denial recommendation, and directing staff to incorporate those findings into a Resolution recommending denial.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The draft Resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney’s Office. 510
-10-
PUBLIC NOTICE:

Pursuant to CMMC Section 13-29(d) three types of public notification have been completed no less than 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing:

1. Mailed notice. A public notice was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the project site. The required notice radius is measured from the external boundaries of the property.

2. On-site posting. A public notice was posted on each street frontage of the project site.

3. Newspaper publication. A public notice was published once in the Daily Pilot newspaper.

As of the preparation of this report, no written public comments have been received. Any public comments received before the May 13, 2024, Planning Commission meeting will be provided separately.

CONCLUSION:

The proposed amendments do not modify the development plans, rather they modify the timing of implementing the project while ensuring the City receives the agreed-upon public benefits. The amendments to the Development Agreement from a single fee payment to a two-payment plan over five years with a 3% interest rate, assists the applicant in meeting the financial commitments to the City while ensuring the City retains the full value of the development fees. Lastly, the applicant proposed language modifications to the Resolutions and Ordinances would be consistent with CMMC - Article 22. Based on the above, staff recommends approval of the proposed amendments.

Attachments:

1. Draft Planning Commission Resolution
Exhibit B

2. Applicants Letters

3. City Council Agenda Report June 15, 2021, 1 st Reading

4. City Council Agenda Report July 20, 2021, 2 nd Reading

5. Ordinance No. 2021-11

6. Ordinance No. 2021-12

7. Ordinance No. 2021-13

8. Resolution No. 2021-55

9. Resolution No. 2021 54
511
The Slogan of One Metro West: The Right Time. The Right Place. The Right Project.

1. Not the Right Time.
-This idea was launched when we were in the middle of a pandemic with residents preoccupied with health & livelihood. There is a good chance many are still unaware and at the time didn’t have the opportunity for public accessibility to the meetings. -The 405 freeway widening construction project is currently underway and will be for years to come. With the OMW project taking up to potentially 10 years to complete the timing is wrong.

2. Not the Right Place or Project.

A. 3000 more people will be added to the area as a result of the OMW project. Traffic congestion on Harbor, Sunflower, the 405 entry & exit points & region already exists currently w/o increasing the nearby population. OMW project projected to increase the Harbor & Gisler intersection up to 680 more trips a day. This effects quality of life and ability to get to & from work & overall movement in the area.

B. The density of the three 7 story buildings one towering up to 98-103 ft, but in actuality upon reading the specific plan, it will range from 108’-113’. These buildings along with night time lighting on the façade will be viewed from an entire region of the Mesa Verde North neighborhood impacting our home. This negatively impacts our quality of life we currently enjoy & our property values will go down.

C. The massive change to the skyline, noise, sight & light pollution will cause buyers that would be interested those in purchasing homes today to no longer be interested as many purchasing homes worth up to $1M-$1.5M don’t want to purchase their home where there is noise, light & sight pollution.

D. Traffic Impact Analysis states the OMW project net trip generation is 6,800 ADT. There is signifigant impact according to the analysis, to two intersections & northbound/southbound fwy ramps discussed in the 4/13/20 PC meeting. This negatively impacts the Mesa Verde North & other surrounding neighborhoods including other Mesa Verde neighborhoods such as those located on or near Country Club.

E. Currently the OMW project is indicating a deficit to the city, so what is the point of approving the project with all the negatives? Even if it could become a break even with the expenses mostly for Police, Fire & Public services, what is the benefit to this project if revenue would be the overriding consideration of which this will not generate.

F. The negative reviews found online for other Rose Equities properties, such as Metropolis in Irvine cite issues with poor construction & materials, design, parking, noise and management problems. This indicates this is not the right company for this project.

G. The FV lighting billboard was defeated due to overwhelming opposition to it. Now a towering structure potentially up to 113’ indicates liberal parameters for lighting the entire façade of which will have unknown artistic renderings is in the OMW plan. Why on earth would a towering structure need to be lit up causing light & sight pollution to the Mesa Verde North neighborhood and 405 freeway? H. Noise and Air quality pollution cited in the OMW project plan during construction with the already existing noise and Air quality pollution of the widening of the 405 freeway. We don’t’ have a choice with the freeway widening as it has to be done but we do have a choice with these massive structures not needing to be built.

I. The idea that only 10% (105 units) of the project will be dedicated to low income housing with the remaining project having high rents, really isn’t as altruistic as presented.

ATTACHMENT 11
-1-
512
As a 40 year Costa Mesa resident, retired Architect & Urban Planner stated, “It is my opinion that the density and location of the proposed development is inconsistent with sound planning practices.” As a homeowner for over 21 years and a native to the local area for almost 6 decades, I have a great concern as to it will affect the property values and the desirability of our homes.

I have been a Real Estate Broker for 23 years and a Realtor for 35 so I can speak to property values and what a development such as this will do to our traffic patterns, property values, quality of life, and congestion. It will undoubtedly bring down property values in this area.” I’ ve spoken to neighbors, that
live in Mesa Verde North that say they’ve been content living in their beautiful homes and neighborhood for years, yet if a development of this size were to go in, they’d be forced to move and possibly face difficulty selling, due to the OMW project going in and it would undoubtedly result in selling for far less money with some Buyers no longer interested in purchasing in that area that would have been before the OMW development. If approved with these changes, it was approved by city council under Measure Y when it was in place. If approved again, it does not seem like the city council is looking out for our best interests based upon all the points I’ve already mentioned. We should not be forced to sell our homes due to decisions being made by elected officials that negatively impact our quality of life & devalue our homes Please make the right decision and say no to the One Metro West development.

Thank you for considering my points.

Best regards,

Diana Denney
714-546-0900

-2-
513
I have lived in Costa Mesa for more than two decades and I’ve lived in Orange County over five decades.

I own my own home and currently live in the Mesa Verde North neighborhood which will be greatly impacted by the One Metro West project.

I’ve been a Real Estate Broker 23 years and I’ve been a Realtor for 35 years. I can speak to property values and what a development such as this will do to our traffic patterns, property values, quality of life, and congestion.

This is a terrible idea and only good for the developers. We have a freeway on ramp there that has enough traffic already including all the traffic up and down Harbor Boulevard. The freeway is already being widened due to the number of people that have already moved into the OC region. It should not be encouraged to move more congestion specifically into this one area.

Safety concerns will arise with the congestion and traffic problems. The idea that we would have a 98- 103 foot tall building with some sort of colorful artistic side facing the freeway and facing the state street homes to make the view better is ridiculous. The development spans a long distance alongside the freeway which will impact hundreds of homes with the view of a towering 98-103 foot building instead of the beautiful blue sky. At night, there will be light pollution instead of the current view.

Buyers seeing this in the distance versus what they see now will make a big difference as to the desirability of the properties in that region. It is my opinion, this will greatly impact property values negatively in the homes in the state Street region that will be subject to viewing such a tall monstrosity.

It is unacceptable to take a neighborhood that is consistently desirable in its reputation and consistently maintains high market values and deteriorate it an untold amount due to adding the proposed One Metro West project. In my experience, there will be many buyers that will not consider purchasing those homes that will be impacted by the noise and light of the towering One Metro West structures, yet they would be saleable and desirable to those same buyers today. Buyers that purchase homes worth up to $1.5M, do not want to purchase their home where there is light and sight pollution. The buyers that would currently be interested in buying in the neighborhood and surrounding neighborhoods, will no longer be interested in purchasing those homes in that region. When it becomes so congested and the traffic patterns are increased to such a high level, it impacts the existing people living in the region‘s ability to enter & exit the freeway to travel to and from work or to shop locally or get in and out of one’s home and do all the normal local tasks and travel to support local businesses. These factors will take property values down as well. It is a unknown amount how high that this project would take it down and it would make homes that are currently desirable absolutely undesirable to a certain number of buyers.

Currently, the 405 construction is underway and will be for years to come. If you add construction of a development of this size it could take up to 10 years for the One West Metro project to be built. How much less desirable are the homes going to be if there is all this construction & congestion going on for years to come? The Rose Equities developer’s other OC projects have poor reviews based upon their poor construction and materials, design, parking, noise and management problems which should cause a concern that this particular developer does not have the reputation to be trusted with such a project.

We can’t afford to put this project in this location or anywhere near this 405 freeway location or Harbor Boulevard. Please consider not just the additional revenue perceived that it will bring in, but instead the countless hundreds of people in their homes that you will impact negatively in allowing this project to go through. In then the end, the amount of people traveling the 405 in that area & traveling Harbor -3-
514
Boulevard in this region is certainly in the hundreds, but perhaps already in the thousands. Please consider the important decisions being made in Costa Mesa. It has been a great city for many years and for the 2 decades I have been here. Changing zoning to Approve projects that were not approved before for good reason, is not a good way to increase revenue. The safety and welfare and overall happiness of the residents needs to be considered as well as making decisions that do no decrease property values.

Thank you for considering my points.

Say no to this One West project in this location.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Diana Denney-Broker
Huntington Landmark Realty
714-546-0900

-4-
515
-5-
516

CITY OF COSTA MESA
Agenda Report
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
TITLE:

FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 PROPOSED OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

AND HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGET
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE, FINANCE DEPARTMENT
PRESENTED BY: LORI ANN FARRELL HARRISON, CITY MANAGER, CAROL MOLINA,

FINANCE DIRECTOR
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CAROL MOLINA, FINANCE DIRECTOR, (714) 754- 5243
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve Resolution 24-XX, adopting the Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget; and

2. Approve Joint Resolution 24-XX adopting the Housing Authority Budget including Housing and Community Development expenditures for Fiscal Year 2024-25; and

3. Authorize and approve staffing as follows:
a. Authorize the following full-time positions: increase of 3.0 FTE for Community Outreach Worker for Homeless Services, decrease of 1.0 FTE Community Outreach Worker for the Tenant Eviction Protection Program, and a decrease of 1.0 FTE Code Enforcement Officer for the Tenant Eviction Protection Program for a net increase of 1.0 FTE as presented at the May 14, 2024 Study Session; and
b. Authorize the following part-time to full-time conversions: Accounting Specialist II in the Police Department for a 0.37 FTE increase due to the increased responsibilities, heavy workload and succession planning purposes, as presented at the May 14, 2024 Study Session; and
c. Authorize a 0.75 part-time Accounting Specialist II in the Finance Department to help support the processing of invoices and a 0.50 part-time Maintenance Worker in the Public Works Department to support the Signs and Markings Program as presented at the May 14, 2024 Study Session; and
d. Approve Salary and Classification Updates Resolution 2024-XX (various CMCEA classifications)

517
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024

4. Approve Resolution 24-XX establishing the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Appropriations Limit for the City of Costa Mesa at $310,115,684, by using Orange County’s growth for population adjustment, and the California per capita income growth for inflationary adjustment; and

5. Approve the City of Costa Mesa’s Revised Special Event Rates; and

6. City Council action is requested for the following to comply with AB 481 Police Equipment Report and Resolution:
a. Receive and file the 2024 Annual AB 481 Report and take public comment; and b. Approve Resolution 24-XX Renewing Ordinance No. 2022-03, the AB 481 Equipment Use Policy of the City of Costa Mesa, California, governing the use of police safety equipment.

BACKGROUND:

The Fiscal Year 2024-25 Proposed Budget includes collaboration efforts throughout all sectors, including public safety, parks, facilities, streets and housing for the City of Costa Mesa residents, businesses, and visitors. Recommended budget adjustments contained in the Proposed Budget were prudently selected based on operational needs, the provision of essential core services to our community, and to implement the City Council’s stated Goals and Priorities more effectively.

Guiding Principles
The guiding principles that inspired the recommendations for the FY 2024-25 Proposed Budget were created when the City Council conducted a Strategic Planning workshop identifying key priorities, as well as a new Mission Statement for Costa Mesa, as follows:
“The City of Costa Mesa serves our residents, businesses, and visitors by promoting a safe, inclusive, and vibrant community.”
In addition, the City Council has developed five Strategic Plan Goals:

Ø Strengthen the Public’s Safety and Improve the Quality of Life; Ø Achieve Long-Term Fiscal Sustainability;
Ø Recruit and Retain High Quality Staff;
Ø Diversify, Stabilize, and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs; and Ø Advance Environmental Sustainability and Climate Resiliency.

The recommendations contained in the FY 2024-25 Proposed Budget are rooted in the Strategic Plan Goals created by the City Council for a safe, inclusive, and vibrant City.

ANALYSIS:

The theme for the FY 2024-25 Proposed Budget, “WhenWe All Pull Together”reflects the collective efforts by City Council and staff to work in collaboration to help drive change for a greater outcome for the residents of Costa Mesa. This includes City Council’srecommendation for staff to establish a Housing Trust in the amount of $2.5 million to assist in funding for housing opportunities. This

518
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
Housing Trust in the amount of $2.5 million to assist in funding for housing opportunities. This budget also includes additional funding for the Homeless and Behavioral Health Programs, IT Strategic Plan, as well as the Arts and Culture Master Plan to allow Departments to achieve shared goals in addressing our most pressing needs and concerns.

Funding requests contained in the FY 2024-25 Proposed Budget help to further stabilize or enhance critical City operations to better serve the public, and/or provide City employees with the technology, equipment, and overall tools to perform their public service effectively. The Proposed Budget also helps to ensure both short-and-long-term fiscal sustainability, while committing additional resources to achieve Council’s goals.

At the April 23, 2024 and May 14, 2024 City Council FY 2024-25 Capital Improvement Budget and Proposed Operating Study Sessions, City Council provided feedback to staff regarding several items to include or adjust in the Proposed Budget. At the April 18, 2024 and the May 15, 2024 Finance and Pension Advisory Committee (FiPAC) meetings, the FY 2024-25 Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget were also presented and discussed.

The agenda reports and videos for the April 23, 2024 and May 14, 2024 City Council Study Sessions can be found here:

April 23, 2024 Agenda Report
Ø FY2024-25 Proposed Capital Improvement Program Budget Study Session Staff Report and Corresponding Attachments <https://costamesa.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx? ID=6641971&GUID=651DDF1C-86B4-4FFB-B35D-4C2140A5BE19>
May 14, 2024 Agenda Report
Ø FY2024-25 Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget Study Session Staff Report and Corresponding Attachments
<https://costamesa.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6664886&GUID=85362F19-9886- Overview of FY 2024-25 Proposed All Funds Budget
The Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget reflects the operating and capital spending plans for the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Capital Project Funds, and Internal Service Funds. The total proposed budget for all funds is $240.1 million, an increase of $6.1 million, or 3 percent compared to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Adopted Budget of $234 million. Table 1 illustrates these amounts.

The All-Funds Budget for the City includes governmental, proprietary, and internal service funds,

519
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
The All-Funds Budget for the City includes governmental, proprietary, and internal service funds, including grants and other restricted funds designated for specific services and purposes provided by higher levels of government (i.e., Federal, State and County governments and agencies).

Many of the City’sspecial and restricted funds receive ongoing revenue streams, while some are one -time competitive grants and require careful monitoring and record keeping.

In some instances, a Fund can have available fund balances that have accumulated over time and are expended as the need arises and/or to complete specific projects within assigned timeframes. As such, the All-Funds Budget contains many funds that are separate entities with specific accounting and reporting requirements as per government regulations and in some cases, statutes.

The City’sGeneral Fund however, is not restricted and can be used to provide a broad array of public services and is comprised of multiple revenue sources including taxes (such as property, sales, and hotel taxes, among others), user fees, fines, facility rentals, and development related fees, to name a few.

The main factors attributed to the year-over-year increase in the FY 2024-25 Proposed All Funds Budget are as follows:

Operating Budget
The proposed increase of $11.2 million, or 6 percent, for a total of $199.5 million in the Operating Budget’s portion of the FY 2024-25 All Funds Budget is comprised of several items including:
· Annualized funding needed to attract, recruit and retain high quality staff through the recently negotiated labor contracts for all employees citywide that aligned employee compensation to essentially average (market rate) levels ($5.8 million); · A $2.5 million increase to the annual CalPERS retirement plan payment; · Recruitment and retention incentives for public safety to help retain tenured and experienced staff in our Police and Fire Departments for adequate succession planning ($400,000); · An increased budget allocation of $300,000 in the Information Technology Department’s budget for software licensing and subscription fees, as well as $1.9 million to fund year five (5) of the IT Strategic Plan;
· A budget reallocation of $945,000 in the Police Department’s General Fund that includes $700,000 for the replacement of body-worn and vehicle cameras, and various contractual increases, such as animal services and software subscriptions; · An additional $200,000 in the Police Department Budget to provide $150,000 in funding for a Wellness Program, and $50,000 for the replacement of a K9 police dog and a new jail contract to handle the arrests of intoxicated femails;
· A budget increase of $200,000 in the Public Works Department for a part-time Maintenance

520
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
· A budget increase of $200,000 in the Public Works Department for a part-time Maintenance Worker and school crossing guard contractual increase; and reallocation of salary savings of $350,000 to fund the Water Quality Control Program;
· An additional $140,000 in projected election costs;
· A realignment of $57,000 from the City Manager’scontingency or salary savings for two (2) senior services programs operated by Community SeniorServ, which includes $28,500 for Meals on Wheels, and $28,500 for Lunch Café;
· An increase of $150,000 in the Public Works Capital Fund for a Facilities Needs Assessment; · An increased budget allocation of $700,000 in the Fire Department’s budget for the Ambulance Program and emergency medical supplies (EMS) (these expenses are offset by the Ambulance Program revenue increase); and
· An ARPA budget transfer of $2.5 million to the Housing Trust Fund.

American Rescue Plan Act
At the April 2, 2024 City Council meeting, Council discussed the need to address housing affordability and to establish a Housing Trust Fund. As result of these discussions, staff recommends appropriating $2.5 million towards the Housing Trust Fund. Additionally, City residents continue to experience hardships due to rising rents; thus, Staff recommends committing the remaining $454,308 uncommitted ARPA Fund for additional assistance to our residents to support the Housing Authority Fund for the Tenant Eviction Protection Program and Homeless Outreach Program. The total of $2.9 million will fully commit the remaining balance from the second tranche of the ARPA Fund.

Parks Land Acquisition Fund
During the May 14, 2024 Proposed Budget Study Session, City Council discussed the need of park spaces in the Westside and Eastside. As result, staff recommends appropriating $350,000 from available fund balance in the Park Land Acquisition Fund (420) towards the Open Space Master Plan.

Equipment Replacement Fund
The FY 2024-25 Proposed Budget includes $1.9 million for the replacement of fleet that has exceeded its life expectancy and/or is essential to operations. The Police Department accounts for $1.05 million, which includes eight (8) Police interceptors/patrol vehicles, a heavy-bodied truck to support the newly acquired armored vehicle, and a light truck for Animal Services.

The Public Works Department FY 2024-25 proposed fleet totals $320,000, which includes one (1) ariel lift truck for tree trimming, and one (1) electric pool vehicle. Additionally, the Parks and Community Services Department’sproposed fleet totals $220,000 for two (2) large passenger vans, one assigned to the Senior Center and the other to transport youth recreation.

The City Manager’sDepartment is proposing three (3) new vehicles to assist with the Homeless

521
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
The City Manager’sDepartment is proposing three (3) new vehicles to assist with the Homeless Outreach Program for a total of $170,000, and Development Services is requesting one (1) a small electric vehicle for $45,000 to support administrative services within the Department.

Information Technology Replacement Fund (ITRF)
This fund accounts for the accumulation of resources necessary to replace hardware and software related to information technology. As per the City’sMunicipal Code Section 2-209.4, 1.5% of annual General Fund revenues is allocated to the ITRF to provide funding for the City’simmediate and future information technology needs, including those identified in the Information Technology Strategic Plan (ITSP). This includes the transfer of $2.85 million from the General Fund into the ITRF to fund year 5 of the ITSP. The proposed budget includes $1.5 million in funding for the second year of the computer-aided dispatch and record-management system (CAD RMS) for public safety, and $380,000 for the Citywide desktop replacement program and City website.

Capital Budget
The proposed all-funds Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget of $27.9 million is a decrease of $3.2 million or 10 percent from the adopted FY 2023-24 budget. This reduction is largely due to one- time funds received in FY 2023-24 in the amount of $14.4 million from State and County grants through State Senator David Min, Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris, and County of Orange Supervisor Katrina Foley. In the FY 2024-25 proposed CIP budget, there is an additional $20 million in projects that may potentially be funded through future bond financing. A comprehensive detail of the Proposed CIP Budget was presented at the April 23, 2024, Study Session and will be contained in further detail in the CIP section of the FY 2024-25 Proposed Budget Book. A few key projects include:
· Emergency Communications Facility Remodel;
· Senior Center - HVAC Replacement;
· Harbor Blvd., 17th St., and Gisler Ave. Rehabilitation Project; · Adams Avenue Undergrounding Project;
· TeWinkle Athletic Fields - Batting Cage Structure & Other Improvements, and; · Signal Modernization for Systemic Multi-Modal Safety Improvements.

Public Works staff presented the one-year (FY 2024-25) and the five-year (FY 2024-25 to FY 2028- 29) Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budgets to the Parks and Community Services (PACS) Commission during its regularly scheduled meeting on May 9, 2024. The PACS Commission recommended to the City Council to prioritize the following parks CIP projects: Gisler Park, Harper Park, Lions Park, and Marina View Park.

In addition, Public Works staff presented the one-year (FY 2024-25) and the five-year (FY 2024-25 to FY 2028-29) Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budgets to the Planning Commission during its regularly scheduled meeting on May 13, 2024. The Planning Commission adopted a resolution to find the CIP programs conform to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and that the one- year and five-year CIP programs are consistent with the Costa Mesa 2015-2035 General Plan.

522
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
Furthermore, during the Budget Study Session on May 14, 2024, staff presented plans to include $150,000 in funding in the CIP operating budget for a facilities-needs assessment. This study is critical in the evaluation of the condition and improvements necessary to maintain City-owned facilities and assets.

Carryover of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget
City Council authorization is requested to grant the City Manager, or Finance Director, permission to carryover any balances on capital projects from the prior years into the next fiscal year to ensure the continuation of projects that were approved by City Council. This will ensure that multiple-year projects continue without interruption. Many CIPs are funded by grants and have competitively sourced funding that are subject to a timeframe outlined in the grant documents. Consequently, deferring or delaying these projects may result in the forfeiture of these fundings.

FY 2024-25 Proposed General Fund Budget Overview
The Proposed FY 2024-25 General Fund expenditure budget is a balanced budget and totals $189.9 million. This reflects an increase of $9.5 million, or 5 percent, from the FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget of $180.3 million. Table 2 is a summary of the Proposed FY 2024-25 General Fund Revenue and Expenditure Budget.

General Fund Revenue Highlights
The Proposed FY 2024-25 Budget for Total General Fund Resources totals $189.9 million, a $9.5 million, or 5 percent increase from the FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget. General Fund Revenue is recovering favorably with several categories returning to or above pre-pandemic levels such as Sales and Use Tax, Licenses and Permits, Use of Money and Property, and Fees and Charges.

These funds are typically used to fund public safety, parks and community services, development services, and other activities and programs known to residents. The Fiscal Year commencing July 1,

523
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
services, and other activities and programs known to residents. The Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2024, budget will be balanced without the use General Fund reserves or the American Rescue Plan Fund.

Graph 1 - General Fund Revenue Estimates by Category
Sales and Use Tax: Sales tax is the largest revenue category in Costa Mesa, and is estimated at $81.5 million, a reduction of $0.9 million, or a 1 percent decrease, from the FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget due to dampened receipts from sellers of general consumer goods, as well as a decline in building and supplies.

Property Tax: All combined Property Tax revenues are estimated at $60.4 million, reflecting a 10 percent growth over the prior fiscal year. As a result of the dissolution of the Successor Agency, the property tax revenues that were utilized to pay required payments on obligations are being redirected to the Property Tax revenue. Costa Mesa anticipates $1.4 million in this realignment plus the annual 4% increase normally received from the County.

Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT): Hotel tax revenues are projected to continue to surpass pre- pandemic levels, with an estimated $10.1 million anticipated next year versus the FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget of $9.5 million. As a result of an increase in hotel rates due to higher inflation, as well as the shift from consumers spending less on tangible items and more on experiences.

Fees and Charges: Fees and Charges are showing signs of recovery at $13.1 million, an increase of $3.5 million, or 36 percent increase, as a result of statutory changes in ambulance reimbursements, while Plan Check fee revenues are anticipated to remain flat at $1.6 million in the Proposed FY 2024- 25 budget.

Measure Q Retail Cannabis Business Tax: The FY 2024-25 Proposed Budget includes an estimated

524
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
Measure Q Retail Cannabis Business Tax: The FY 2024-25 Proposed Budget includes an estimated $3.4 million in cannabis taxes, an increase of $350,000, or 11 percent, from FY 2023-24, as the City has already approved over 20 retail storefront and non-storefront businesses. It is anticipated that with these businesses, the projected retail tax revenue will be realized in FY 2024-25. Also, as previously approved by the City Council, the Proposed Budget has two restricted Special Revenue Funds that are financed by the cannabis retail tax: The Arts and Culture Master Plan Fund and the First Time Homebuyers Fund.

Operating Budget Highlights
FY 2024-25 General Fund Budget Expenditure Highlights the Proposed Operating General Fund Budget for FY 2024-25 reflects total expenditure of $189.9 million. Of this amount, $177.2 million in operating costs represents an increase of $11.9 million, or seven percent, from the current year’s adopted operating budget of $165.4 million. The General Fund transfer of $3.3 million to the Equipment Replacement Fund was reclassified from a transfer out to an internal rent category for consistency reporting purposes. The remaining $9.7 million represents the Transfers Out to the Capital Improvement Fund, and the Information Technology Fund described earlier. The FY 2024-25 Proposed Budget for expenditures includes the following significant items:
· A $2.9 million allocation for the City Council approved Five-Year Information Technology Strategic Plan (Year 5);
· A $2.3 million increase in the annual required CalPERS contributions; · An additional $500,000 in funding for medical, dental and vision benefits and $5.5 million in compensation increase as per contractual MOU requirements; · A $400,000 increase for recruitment and retention incentives for public safety to help retain tenured and experienced staff in our Police and Fire and Rescue Departments for adequate succession planning;
· An increased budget allocation of $700,000 to the Fire and Rescue Department for the Ambulance Program and emergency medical supplies (these expenses are offset by an increase the ambulance program revenue);
· The continuation of the $4.3 million vacancy factor (negative appropriation); and · No use of General Fund Reserves or ARPA funds to balance the General Fund.

525
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
Staffing Levels
The FY 2024-25 Proposed Budget includes 602 full-time employees, which includes FY 2023-24 amendment staffing adjustments of a net 12 FTEs. The Proposed Budget incorporates an additional net of 2 full-time equivalents. With the proposed changes, full-time staffing levels are climbing back to nearing FY 2009-10 pre-recession levels.

526
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024

527
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
The Proposed Budget includes a net of 2.62 new positions to the Table of Organization and the General Fund.

Case Management and Housing Navigation Services - The City Manager’sDepartment is requesting an increase of three (3) Community Outreach Workers to provide in-house case management and housing navigation services. By having this function in-house, case management efficiencies can be realized that could result in better overall outcomes and potentially more expedient housing placements for clients at the shelter.

Tenant Eviction Protection - At the May 7, 2024, City Council meeting, staff provided an update on the Tenant Eviction Protection Program and related services to residents facing eviction and potential homelessness. The program has resulted in a 50 percent reduction in the number of eviction notices issued to residents. In November 2023, when the Ordinance was adopted, the City Manager requested and was granted authority for up to four (4) additional positions, if needed, to properly administer the program: one (1) Community Outreach Worker, (and a second, if needed); one (1) Senior Planner; and, one (1) Code Enforcement Officer. Of the four (4) positions authorized, only three (3) were filled.

The Code Enforcement Officer position remained vacant as there was no measurable work related to the new Ordinance that could not be handled by existing Code Enforcement Officers. The Senior Planner was filled and remains in the Proposed Budget for next year. The two Community Outreach Worker positions were filled quickly to help make an immediate impact and reduce the number of no- fault evictions. However, currently, there is only sufficient workload to necessitate one (1) Community Outreach Worker to support residents in risk of evictions. In the past six (6) months, twenty-five families have been served by the City. Further, certain aspects of the tenant protection program have been absorbed by the Constituent Services Team further reducing the need for two Outreach Worker positions. Moreover, one of the Outreach Worker positions will soon be vacant. As such, the Proposed Budget reflects a realignment of the staffing level for this program from four to two positions. This is both programmatically and fiscally prudent as the funding source for these positions

528
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
is ARPA, which will end after 2025.

The Finance Department is proposing to add one (1) part-time Accounting Specialist II to support processing invoices for payments in accounts payable. This position will be fully funded by the existing operating budget in the Finance Department. The Police Department is requesting to convert a part-time Accounting Specialist II to a full-time position. Lastly, the Public Works Department is requesting to add a part-time Maintenance Worker to assist with the Signs and Markings Program within the Department.

Compensation Adjustments
The Costa Mesa City Employees Association’s(CMCEA) MOU contains a provision for CMCEA to request up to five (5) compensation inequity studies each year. This allows for at least five (5) classifications in this particular bargaining unit to be analyzed by Human Resources to identify whether there are discrepancies in compensation relative to the prevailing market. A classification update may also be needed based on the duties and functions being performed by the incumbent(s).

Classification studies may also result in a recommendation to adjust compensation. For 2024, CMCEA requested compensation-inequity studies for the following five classifications:

1. Community Services Specialist

2. Crime Scene Investigator

3. Engineering Technician

4. Equipment Mechanic

5. Office Specialist
Commitment to Public Safety
The FY 2024-25 Proposed Budget includes $99.7 million as the City’scommitment to public safety comprised of both the Police and Fire Departments. The public safety budgets make up more than 52 percent of the General Fund Proposed Budget at 32 percent for Police and 20 percent for the Fire and Rescue Department, respectively. Of the 602 Citywide full-time personnel, approximately 38 percent are sworn, which is on level with funding levels prior to the Great Recession.

The Police Department budget now contains 142 full-time sworn personnel. The Proposed Budget includes the conversion of three (3) part-time positions to full-time, two (2) that were approved at the FY 2023-24 mid-year. The Police Department also manages the entire Animal Services and Enforcement Program. The reorganization aligns with the City Council Goal - Strengthen the Public’s Safety and Improve the Quality of Life.

In addition, the Police Department’ssalaries and benefits budget increased by a net of $3.2 million, mostly due to labor contractual agreements and retirement benefits. As in prior years and to balance the General Fund, the Department includes a vacancy factor of approximately $3.7 million in the budget to capture its average vacancy rate.

The Police Department Proposed Budget for the Equipment Replacement Fund includes $1.05 million in funding eight Police interceptor vehicles, a light truck for Animal Control, and a heavy one-

529
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
ton police truck to haul equipment and support the recently received police armored vehicle.

The Fire and Rescue Department contains 85 full-time sworn personnel. The Fire and Rescue Department’ssalaries and benefits budget increased by a net of $1.3 million, mostly due to labor contractual agreements and longevity pay. Additionally, the Proposed Budget includes a $700,000 increase in the Department’s ambulance program, which is wholly offset by an increase in revenue.

Diversify, Stabilize, and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs To support affordable housing, $2.5 million is recommended to be allocated from ARPA towards a Housing Trust Fund to assist with affordable housing development. The Proposed Budget includes continued funding for the City’shomeless outreach and bridge shelter programs and operations of $3.7 million. One project forthcoming includes an additional 15 beds for the permanent Bridge Shelter for Behavioral Health funded by a County of Orange Health Care Agency (OCHCA) Grant.

Furthermore, the Development Services Department will work on the implementation of the Affordable Housing Ordinance. The ordinance will ensure that new housing projects will provide a certain percentage of its housing units as affordable units to moderate, low, and/or very low-income households.

Advance Environmental Sustainability and Climate Resiliency To achieve environmental sustainability and climate resiliency, the Proposed Budget includes $300,000 in funding for a water quality program to monitor the City’scompliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). This program will coordinate and implement the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board (Regional Water Board) directives for compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act and California’sPorter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, as it relates to City drainage into the Santa Ana River and the Newport Bay. Furthermore, there will be inspections related to commercial/industrial sites, as well as construction sites, and enforcement connected to illicit discharge.

Transfers Out
Transfers Out from All Funds total $12.6 million, a decrease of $1.9 million, or 13 percent from FY 2023-24. Of that total, $9.7 million are Transfers Out from the General Fund into two funds: $6.85 million into the Capital Improvement Fund,
$2.85 million into the Information Technology Replacement Fund. The majority of the transfer out reduction is due to the reallocation of the General Fund’stransfer out to the Equipment Replacement in Non-Departmental to an Internal Rent category for reporting purposes consistent with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

The remaining $2.9 million Transfer Out of the $12.6 million is from the American Rescue Plan Fund, consisting of a transfer of $2.5 million for the Housing Trust Fund, and $454,308 into the Housing Authority Fund to support the Tenant Eviction Protection Program.

530
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
General Fund Reserves
The City continues to demonstrate strong fiscal prudence and controls on spending. The combined commitment for emergency reserves including the declared disaster and economic reserves, is indicative of financial discipline. The General Fund reserves currently at $59 million exceeds the City Council policy of $55 million.

FY 2024-25 Housing Authority
On January 17, 2012, under the California Housing Authorities Law, Health, and Safety Code Section 34200, et seq. (“HAL”),the City Council established the Costa Mesa Housing Authority (“Housing Authority”). Also, on that date by resolution, the City Council selected the Housing Authority to serve as the “housing successor” and to assume the housing assets, duties, functions, and obligations of the former Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency (“FormerAgency”)as of February 1, 2012.

Section 34176.1 establishes certain limitations on expenditures by housing successors; thus, each fiscal year the Housing Authority’s funding is limited in two categories: (1) administrative costs, including covenant monitoring, and (2) homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing.

Homeless Outreach
The Homeless Outreach program combines the City’s Network for Homeless Solutions with the Housing Authority’sHomeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Program. Both programs serve the same functions and offer a broad range of services to homeless individuals, such as assisting with housing options; creating a social service registry; establishing a network of nonprofit and faith-based organizations; providing outreach services; and reconnecting new homeless persons to their families and services in their city/state of origin.

531
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
Costa Mesa Bridge Shelter
The Housing Authority accounts for all shelter operating activities, including shelter operator contract, utilities, external rents, maintenance, and other operational costs. In March 2021, the Costa Mesa Bridge Shelter on Airway Avenue was completed and opened, and a partnership was established between the City of Costa Mesa and the City of Newport Beach. The permanent shelter serves as a temporary home for as many as 85 men and women in need. It is intended to help homeless individuals and residents who are affected by homelessness. To provide better service to the clients at the Bridge Shelter, the City Manager’sDepartment is requesting an increase of three (3) Community Outreach Workers to provide in-house case management and housing navigation services. By having this function in-house, case management efficiencies can be realized that could result in better overall outcomes and potentially more expedient housing placements for clients at the shelter.

The Housing Authority’sFY 2024-25 budget consists of funding from a variety of resources with distinct purposes. This includes rental income, loan repayments, grants, subsidies, and contributions/donations.

Table 7 - FY2024-25 Proposed Housing Authority Budget
FY 2023/24
Adopted
FY 2024/25
Proposed
Increase/(Decrease)
Amount/Percentage
Total Resources $4,400,316 $6,290,709 $1,890,393 43%
Total Appropriations $4,017,325 $6,290,709 $2,273,384 57% FY2024-25 Appropriations Limit
Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California requires that the City establish annually an Appropriations Limit. This appropriations limit determines the maximum amount of specific tax revenues which an agency is allowed to spend. Pursuant to Article XIII B and its implementing legislation, the total annual appropriations limit must be calculated by adjusting the prior year’s appropriations limit for changes in the cost of living and population growth.

For the FY 2024-2025 calculation, the City uses the population growth of the County of Orange of

0.31% since it yields a higher population growth factor, and the growth in California per capita income as its inflation factor as provided by the State Department of Finance (DOF).

As a result, the City is $146.9 million less, or 47.4% below the proposed Fiscal Year 2024-2025 appropriations limit. Therefore, the City is well within its appropriations limit established pursuant to Section 7910 of the California Government Code and will not exceed this limit during Fiscal Year 2024-2025. Below is the calculation utilized for the appropriations limit.

CITY OF COSTA MESA

CALCULATION OF APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR FY 2024-2025
The City's Appropriations Limit for FY 24-25 is calculated as follows:

Step 1 Appropriations Limit for FY 23-24 298,356,781$
Step 2 Multiply the FY 23-24 Appropriations Limit by the cumulative growth factors for changes in the California per capita personal income and the population change for the City of Costa Mesa. 1.0394
Appropriations Limit for FY 24-25 310,115,684$
*CALCULATION OF CUMULATIVE GROWTH FACTORS:

Personal Income Factor 1.0362
Orange County Population Change 1.0031
Costa Mesa Population Change 0.9969
*(1.0362 x 1.0031) = 1.0394
Per capita Cost of Living converted to ratio (3.62+100/100) 1.0362 Orange County Population converted to ratio (0.31+100/100) 1.0031 Costa Mesa Population converted to ratio (-0.31+100/100) 0.9969 * The City has the option to utilize the larger of the annual percentage change of the City or the County.

532
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024

CITY OF COSTA MESA

CALCULATION OF APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR FY 2024-2025
The City's Appropriations Limit for FY 24-25 is calculated as follows:

Step 1 Appropriations Limit for FY 23-24 298,356,781$
Step 2 Multiply the FY 23-24 Appropriations Limit by the cumulative growth factors for changes in the California per capita personal income and the population change for the City of Costa Mesa. 1.0394
Appropriations Limit for FY 24-25 310,115,684$
*CALCULATION OF CUMULATIVE GROWTH FACTORS:

Personal Income Factor 1.0362
Orange County Population Change 1.0031
Costa Mesa Population Change 0.9969
*(1.0362 x 1.0031) = 1.0394
Per capita Cost of Living converted to ratio (3.62+100/100) 1.0362 Orange County Population converted to ratio (0.31+100/100) 1.0031 Costa Mesa Population converted to ratio (-0.31+100/100) 0.9969 * The City has the option to utilize the larger of the annual percentage change of the City or the County.

FY 2024-25 Special Event Rates
Regarded as one of the most livable cities in the County, Costa Mesa offers community celebrations, festivals, and parades that provide opportunities for social activity, cultural experience, creative expression, and engagement in public life. Being named the City of the Arts, special events benefit the community through exposure to artistic and creative innovation, while providing entertaining ways to relax and enjoy life.

Each year, the City hosts, sponsors and/or coordinates with other agencies and local organizations to hold programs and activities that our local citizenry enjoy and love. These activities include the OC Fair and the OC Marathon, to name a couple.

A majority of events require public safety, public works, community development, and/or parks and community services staff. As such, the City costs out an hourly rate for the City personnel requested/needed to staff these events. The City takes into consideration a position’shourly rate and corresponding benefits attributed to the position/classification.

Staff is requesting the approval of the attached Rate Determination Schedule that has been realigned with the rates of our neighboring cities.

533
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
2024 Annual AB 481 Police Safety Equipment Report
Per AB 481, law enforcement agencies are required to submit an annual report to the governing body on the use of the equipment, any complaints regarding the use of the equipment, results of any internal audits on the use of the equipment, annual costs of the equipment, quantity possessed by the agency, and any intent to purchase new equipment in the following year.

Items deemed to be AB 481 equipment are used as a component of best practices for law enforcement agencies throughout the country. These tools have been tested in the field and used by law enforcement agencies to enhance both citizen safety and officer safety. Loss of these items would jeopardize the welfare of citizens and peace officers within the Costa Mesa Police Department The term “militaryequipment,”as used in AB 481, does not necessarily indicate equipment that has been used by, or obtained from, the military. Pursuant to AB 481, items deemed to be “military equipment” include, but are not limited to, unmanned aerial or ground vehicles, armored rescue vehicles, command and control vehicles, specialized firearms and ammunition, less lethal 40mm projectile launchers, long range acoustic devices, flashbangs, “tear gas,” and pepper balls.

CMPD is committed to using the most up to date tools and equipment to safeguard the citizens of Costa Mesa. Many of the items deemed to be AB 481 equipment are utilized by CMPD, and law enforcement agencies across the country, in order to specifically reduce risk to community members.

These items provide peace officers with the ability to safely resolve volatile situations, which otherwise might rise to the level of a lethal force encounter. Items listed in this report, and accompanying AB 481 Equipment Use Policy, also provide CMPD’speace officers with vital tools that facilitate compliance with its comprehensive use of force policy.

Other items deemed to be AB 481 equipment include equipment such as specialized rifles.

Specialized rifles allow peace officers in rare and unpredictable circumstances to address lethal threats from a greater distance and with greater precision.

There is significant interest to ensure law enforcement continues to have access to equipment that will provide peace officers as many options as possible to safeguard lives, ensure safety, de-escalate volatile circumstances, and protect civil liberties. The use of the tools identified below are vital to CMPD’s mission and will continue to be strictly regulated through internal processes and oversight.

Staff seeks to authorize the CMPD’s continued use of the specified equipment based upon the attached Annual AB 481 Report. The report addressed each item responsive to the requirements of AB 481 and includes a list of equipment prescribed under AB 481, including information regarding the description, cost, quantity, capabilities, purpose, authorized use, lifespan, fiscal impact, training, and legal and procedural rules for each item. A majority of these particular items were in place prior to the implementation of AB 481.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council can provide alternative direction to staff on the FY 2024-25 Proposed Operating Budget through June 30, 2025. An additional Study Session can be held on Tuesday, June 11, 2024, if needed, with a second alternative final adoption date of Tuesday, June 18, 2024, if desired.

534
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
FISCAL REVIEW:

The FY 2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget provides the funding and expenditure plan for all funds. As such, it serves as the City’sfinancial plan for the upcoming fiscal year. The City Council will be kept apprised regarding actual operating results for the General Fund through a quarterly financial report and the Mid-Year Budget Review. The Mid-Year Budget Review will include an update of the fiscal year’s projected revenues and expenditures, and any recommended adjustments, if necessary.

LEGAL REVIEW:

The City Attorney’s Office has reviewed and approved this report as to form.

CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item supports the City Council goals:
· Strengthen the Public’s Safety and Improve the Quality of Life · Achieve Long-term Fiscal Sustainability
· Recruit and Retain High Quality Staff
· Diversify, Stabilize, and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs · Advance Environmental Sustainability and Climate Resiliency CONCLUSION:

The strong commitment of our City Council, residents and community partners for healthy, sustainable neighborhoods and balanced economic activity, both facilitate and aid us to continue the quality of services we provide.

Staff recommends that City Council:

1. Approve Resolution 24-XX, adopting the Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget; and

2. Approve Joint Resolution 24-XX adopting the Housing Authority Budget including Housing and Community Development expenditures for Fiscal Year 2024-25; and

3. Authorize and approve staffing as follows:
a. Authorize the following full-time positions: increase of 3.0 FTE for Community Outreach Worker for Homeless Services, decrease of 1.0 FTE Community Outreach Worker for the Tenant Eviction Protection Program, and decrease of 1.0 FTE Code Enforcement Officer for the Tenant Eviction Protection Program for a net increase of 1.0 FTE as presented at the May 14, 2024 Study Session; and
b. Authorize a part-time to full-time conversion Accounting Specialist II in the Police

535
File #: 24-232 Meeting Date: 6/4/2024
b. Authorize a part-time to full-time conversion Accounting Specialist II in the Police Department for a 0.37 FTE increase due to the increased responsibilities, heavy work workload and succession planning purposes, as presented at the May 14, 2024 Study Session; and
c. Authorize the following additions: a 0.75 part-time Accounting Specialist II in the Finance Department to help support with the processing of invoices and a 0.50 part-time Maintenance Worker in the Public Works Department to support the Signs and Markings Program as presented at the May 14, 2024 Study Session; and d. Approve Salary and Classification Updates Resolution 2024-XX (various CMCEA classifications).

4. Approve Resolution 24-XX establishing the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Appropriations Limit for the City of Costa Mesa at $310,115,684, by using Orange County’s growth for population adjustment, and the California per capita income growth for inflationary adjustment; and

5. Approve the City of Costa Mesa’s Revised Special Event Rates; and

6. City Council action is requested for the following to comply with AB 481 Police Equipment Report and Resolution:
a. Receive and file the 2024 Annual AB 481 Report and take public comment; and b. Approve Resolution 24-XX Renewing Ordinance No. 2022-03, the AB 481 Equipment Use Policy of the City of Costa Mesa, California, governing the use of police safety equipment.

536
Resolution No. 24-xx Page 1 of 3
ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO. 24-xx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared and submitted to the City Council a proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 in compliance with Section 2-119 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 2-209 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code requires the City to allocate a minimum of five percent (5%) of the annual General Fund revenues to the capital expenditures Fund and a minimum of one and a half percent (1.5%) of the annual G eneral Fund revenues to the Information Technology Replacement Fund, for a combined minimum allocation of six and a half percent (6.5%); and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a Strategic Planning workshop identifying key priorities, as well as a new Mission Statement for the City of Costa Mesa: “The City of Costa Mesa serves our residents, businesses, and visitors by promoting a safe, inclusive, and vibrant community.” and
WHEREAS, in addition to a new Mission Statement, five new Strategic Plan Goals were developed: (1) Strengthen the Public’s Safety and Improve the Quality of Life ; (2) Achieve Long- Term Fiscal Sustainability ; (3) Recruit and Retain High Quality Staff ; (4) Diversify, Stabilize, and Increase Housing to Reflect Community Needs; and (5) Advance Environmental Sustainability and Climate Resiliency; and
WHEREAS, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, signed into law by President Joe Biden in March 2021, is a $1.9 trillion in economic stimulus plan; thereby providing for a wide variety of funding efforts to offset the economic losses resulting from the worldwide pandemic. Included is the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund delivering $350 billion for State, Local, and Tribal Governments to address economic loss as a result of the pandemic. The City of Costa Mesa was allocated $26.5 million, receiving 50% in FY 2020-2021, and the other 50% in FY 2021-2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing at its regular meeting on June 4 , 2024 regarding the proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the proposed Operating & Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and input from the public, and desires to adopt the Proposed Operating & Capital Improve ment Budget for Fiscal Year 2024- 2025, as the Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. 537
Resolution No. 24-xx Page 2 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

Section 1. The Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Year 2024- 2025 is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

Section 2. Th e Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Year 2024- 2025, as prepared and submitted by the City Manager, is hereby approved and adopted in the amount of $240,115,342.

Section 3. T he Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 shall be considered amended upon the close of Fiscal Year 2024- 2025 to include and reappropriate any outstanding encumbrances carried forward.

Section 4. T he Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 shall be considered amended upon the close of Fiscal Year 2024-2025 to include and reappropriate funds for all previously approved projects that have not been initiated or completed. The City Council authorizes the City Manager or Finance Director t o carryover any balances on Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) from the prior years into the next fiscal year to ensure the continuation of projects that were approved.

Section 5. T he City Council authorizes the City Manager or Finance Director to make changes in internal service fund allocations to departments to reflect any modifications made after the Adopted Budget was presented.

Section 6. T
he City Manager or Finance Director, for the purpose of administrative necessity in implementing the budget, shall have the authority to transfer monies to the appropriate item, account, program, department, or fund to cover expenditures which have been approved by the City Council, except where such transfer is expressly prohibited in a resolution or ordinance approved by the City Council. The City Manager or Finance Director shall also have the authority to transfer monies between and within funds to meet the operational needs of the City within established spending limits.

Section 7:

That the Tables of Organization, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment 5 and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, is hereby approved and adopted. The City Manager may revise the Tables of Organization provided that the authorized number of personnel within the City is not exceeded.

Section 8: That the City Manager or Finance Director may, as necessary, appropriate donations and grants received during the fiscal year up to $100,000 per source or grantor.

Donations and grant awards requiring matching funds (in- cash), or exceeding $100,000 from a single source or grantor, shall require City Council approval. Any resolutions authorizing budget amendments related to donations and grants in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

Section 9:

That the City Manager or Finance Director may, as necessary, appropriate revenue and expenditure allocations, for emergency public safety mutual aid requests, as expenses are incurred and reimbursements are received, for a net neutral fiscal impact. 538
Resolution No. 24-xx Page 3 of 3
Section 10: That the City Manager or Finance Director may, as necessary, appropriate and transfer Federal American Rescue Plan (ARP) Funds, to comply with U.S. Treasury Guidelines and to facilitate audit review and compliance.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 2024.

John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST:

Brenda Green, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 24-xx and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 4 th day of June, 2024, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 5th day of June, 2024.

Brenda Green, City Clerk
539
All Funds Revenues and Sources of Funds
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Fund/Account Description
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 23-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 24-25
Proposed
Budget
%
Incr/
(Dec)

GENERAL FUND
Fund 101 - General Fund $ 165,941,399 $ 177,491,471 $ 180,327,042 $ 189,894,159 5%

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Fund 130 - Cultural Arts Master Plan
Cannabis Q Bus Tax - 16,000 166,667 238,300 43%
Total Fund 130 $ - $ 16,000 $ 166,667 $ 238,300 43% Fund 140 - First Time Homebuyer Program
Cannabis X Bus Tax $ - $ - $ 166,667 $ 238,300 43%
Cannabis Q Bus Tax - 16,000 - - 0%
Total Fund 140 $ - $ 16,000 $ 166,667 $ 238,300 43% Fund 150 - Disaster Fund
Other County Grants/Programs $ 498 $ 306,283 $ - $ - 0% FEMA Disaster Reimbursement 107,377 - - - 0%
Operating Transfers In - 637,856 - - 0%
Total Fund 150 $ 107,876 $ 944,139 $ - $ - 0%
Fund 201 - Gas Tax
Investment Earnings $ 63,481 $ 116,514 $ 0 $ 0 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (226,216) (46,049) - - 0% Gasoline Tax - Section 2103 891,312 916,823 1,114,720 998,927 -10% Gasoline Tax - Section 2105 625,561 640,351 738,171 698,377 -5% Gasoline Tax - Section 2106 392,595 406,599 461,312 445,387 -3% Gasoline Tax - Section 2107.1 747,903 872,692 886,642 954,427 8% Gasoline Tax - Section 2107.5 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 100% Other Reimbursements 32,354 - - - 0%
Total Fund 201 $ 2,536,990 $ 2,916,929 $ 3,210,845 $ 3,117,118 -3% Fund 203 - Air Quality
Air Quality Improvement Fees $ 108,657 $ 177,214 $ 145,800 $ 145,800 0% Investment Earnings 4,629 6,644 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (14,523) (2,801) - - 0% Total Fund 203 $ 98,763 $ 181,057 $ 145,800 $ 145,800 0% Fund 204 - American Rescue Plan
American Rescue Plan $ - $ 4,802,856 $ 1,440,737 $ 2,972,172 106% Investment Earnings 50,330 208,050 - - 0%
Total Fund 204 $ 50,330 $ 5,010,906 $ 1,440,737 $ 2,972,172 100% 1City of Costa Mesa, California

ATTACHMENT 2
540
All Funds Revenues and Sources of Funds
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Fund/Account Description
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 2 2-23
Actual
FY 2
3-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2 4-25
Proposed
Budget
%
I
ncr/
(Dec)
Fund 205 - HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME)
Lien/Loan Repayment $ 45,009 $ 40,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 0% Investment Earnings 14,226 24,201 - 14,803 0%
HOME Invest. Partnership Grant 16,638 137,581 509,260 509,260 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (51,498) (9,084 ) - - 0% Total Fund 205 $ 24,376 $ 192,698 $ 529,260 $ 544,063 3% Fund 207 - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Lien/Loan Repayment $ 7,500 $ - $ - $ - 0%
Community Dev. Block Grant $ 594,256 $ 1,794,310 $ 1,722,893 $ 1,360,506 -21% Investment Earnings 153 609 - - 0%
Total Fund 207 $ 601,909 $ 1,794,919 $ 1,722,893 $ 1,360,506 -21% Fund 213 - Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLESF) Citizens’ Option Public Safety $ 279,629 $ 284,819 $ 331,480 $ 331,480 0% Investment Earnings (60) 887 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (634) (365) - - 0%
Total Revenues $ 278,936 $ 285,341 $ 331,480 $ 331,480 0% Total Fund 213 $ 278,936 $ 285,341 $ 331,480 $ 331,480 0% Fund 216 - Rental Rehabilitation Program
Investment Earnings 2,658 4,655 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (9,509) (1,818) - - 0%
Total Fund 216 $ (6,851) $ 2,837 $ - $ - 0%
Fund 217 - Narcotics Forfeiture
Asset Forfeiture-County/Other $ 4,728 $ - $ - $ - 0%
Asset Forf OC Drug/Gang Actvty 834 - - - 0%
Asset Forfeiture - Treasury - 76,487 - - 0%
Investment Earnings 15,660 28,497 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (56,873) (10,745) - - 0% Total Fund 217 $ (35,650) $ 94,240 $ - $ - 0%
Fund 219 - Local Law Enforcement Block Grant
Fund 220 - Office of Traffic Safety
Other Federal Grants $ 130,022 $ 259,141 $ - $ - 0%
Total Fund 220 $ 130,022 $ 259,141 $ - $ - 0%
Fund 226 - Housing Trust Fund
Operating Transfers In $ - $ - $ - $ - 100%
Total Fund 226 $ - $ - $ - $ - 100%
Fund 230 - Federal Grants
Other Federal Grants $ 252,925 $ 826,056 $ 3,830,472 $ 6,033,090 58% Investment Earnings - 32,757 - - 0%
Local Law Enforcemnt Blk Grnt - 108,137 - - 0%
Total Fund 230 $ 252,925 $ 966,950 $ 3,830,472 $ 6,033,090 58% 2 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
541
All Funds Revenues and Sources of Funds
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Fund/Account Description
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 2 2-23
Actual
FY 2
3-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2 4-25
Proposed
Budget
%
I
ncr/
(Dec)
Fund 231 - State Grants
Other State Grants $ 742,996 $ 1,075,470 $ 11,531,955 $ 350,490 -97% Beverage Container Program (103,431) 159,969 - - 0%
Total Fund 231 $ 639,565 $ 1,235,439 $ 11,531,955 $ 350,490 -97% Fund 251 - Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Gas Tax Investment Earnings $ 68,651 $ 158,361 $ - $ - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (269,430) (66,616) - - 0% Gasoline Tax - RMRA 2,270,154 2,510,541 2,780,829 2,878,935 4% Total Fund 251 $ 2,069,375 $ 2,602,286 $ 2,780,829 $ 2,878,935 4%

CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Fund 208 - Park Development Fees
Park Development Fees $ 1,278,941 $ 158,327 $ 328,095 $ 100,000 -70% Investment Earnings 43,050 52,806 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (143,842) (19,612) - - 0% Total Fund 208 $ 1,178,149 $ 191,520 $ 328,095 $ 100,000 -70% Fund 209 - Drainage Fees
Measure “M2” Regional Grant $ - $ 107,327 $ - $ - 0%
Drainage Assessment Fees 348,736 76,516 213,206 100,000 -53% Investment Earnings 20,782 37,174 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (77,839) (14,462) - - 0% Total Fund 209 $ 291,679 $ 206,555 $ 213,206 $ 100,000 -53% Fund 214 - Traffic Impact Fees
Traffic Impact Fees $ 437,943 $ 601,330 $ 1,533,025 $ 1,500,000 -2% Other Reimbursements - 7,167 - - 0%
Investment Earnings 53,938 98,890 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (197,108) (38,513) - - 0% Total Fund 214 $ 294,773 $ 668,873 $ 1,533,025 $ 1,500,000 -2% Fund 218 - Fire System Development
Fund 228 - Fire Protection System Paramedic Fund
Fund 401 - Capital Outlay
Other Federal Grants
$ 530,982 $ 190,599 $ - $ - 0%
Other State Grants 15,147 - - - 0%
Investment Earnings 174,364 401,158 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (778,219) (184,930) - - 0% Other Reimbursements 59,435 64,585 - - 0%
Total Revenues $ 1,708 $ 471,412 $ - $ - 0%
Operating Transfers In $ 8,533,467 $ 13,482,325 $ 6,849,994 $ 6,849,994 0% Total Other Financing Sources $ 8,533,467 $ 13,482,325 $ 6,849,994 $ 6,849,994 0% Total Fund 401 $ 8,535,176 $ 13,953,737 $ 6,849,994 $ 6,849,994 0% 3City of Costa Mesa, California

542
All Funds Revenues and Sources of Funds
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Fund/Account Description
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 22-23
Actual
FY 23-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 24-25
Proposed
Budget
%
Incr/
(Dec)

Fund 409 - Vehicle Parking District 1
Secured Property Tax $ 4,60 7 $ 5,05 2 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 0% Unsecured Property Tax 13 12 12 12 0%
Supplemental Property Tax 9 17 11 11 0%
Homeowners Property Tax 2 2 2 2 0%
Delinquent Tax - Penalties/Int 1 1 1 1 0%
Investment Earnings 383 758 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (1,430) (307) - - 0% Total Fund 409 $ 3,584 $ 5,53 5 $ 4,026 $ 4,026 0%

Fund 410 - Vehicle Parking District 2
Secured Property Tax $ 12,277 $ 10,2 43 $ 12,260 $ 12,260 0% Unsecured Property Tax 10 10 11 11 0%
Supplemental Property Tax 8 14 11 11 0%
Homeowners Property Tax 2 1 2 2 0%
Delinquent Tax - Penalties/Int 1 0 1 1 0%
Investment Earnings 873 1,72 3 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (3,281) (695) - - 0% Total Fund 410 $ 9,89 0 $ 11,2 97 $ 12,285 $ 12,285 0%

Fund 413 - Golf Course Improvement
Investment Earnings $ 4,54 6 $ 10,57 3 $ - $ - 0% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (18,093) (4,318) - - 0% Golf Course Operations 163,020 159,695 110,000 110,000 0% Total Fund 413 $ 149,474 $ 165,951 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 0% Fund 415 - Measure M2 Competitive

Fund 416 - Measure M2 Fairshare
Measure “M2” Fairshare $ 3,096,611 $ 3,453,031 $ 3,010,812 $ 3,871,148 29% Investment Earnings 41,711 92,748 - - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (147,423) (39,696) - - 0% Total Fund 416 $ 2,990,899 $ 3,506,083 $ 3,010,812 $ 3,871,148 29%

Fund 417 - Jack Hammett Sports Complex Capital Improvement

Fund 418 - Lions Park Project 2017 Bond

Fund 420 - Park Land Acquisition
Operating Transfers In $ - $ - $ 384,576 $ - -100% Total Fund 420 $ - $ - $ 384,576 $ - -100%

4 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
543
All Funds Revenues and Sources of Funds
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Fund/Account Description
FY 21-22
Actual
FY 2 2-23
Actual
FY 2
3-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2 4-25
Proposed
Budget
%
I
ncr/
(Dec)

INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Fund 601 - Equipment Replacement Fund
Investment Earnings $ 43,626 $ 133,510 $ - $ 52,313 100% GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (246,084) (56,771) - - 0% Sale of Automotive Equipment 55,749 57,220 - - 0%
Sale of Other Equipment 9,831 10,739 - - 0%
Other Governmental Agencies - 159,985 - - 0%
Automotive Equipment, Rental 2,629,809 5,442,580 2,656,416 5,901,286 122% Damage to City Property - 160 - - 0%
Other Reimbursements 500,000 41,402 - - 0%
Total Revenues $ 2,992,932 $ 5,788,825 $ 2,656,416 $ 5,953,599 124% Operating Transfers In $ 3,567,549 $ 1,003,556 $ 3,167,403 $ - -100% Total Other Financing Sources $ 3,567,549 $ 1,003,556 $ 3,167,403 $ - -100% Total Fund 601 $ 6,560,481 $ 6,792,381 $ 5,823,819 $ 5,953,599 2% Fund 602 - Self Insurance Fund
Investment Earnings $ 129,090 $ 279,402 $ - $ - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (553,025) (125,604) - - 0% Settlements Revenue 3,000 1,326,382 - - 0%
Unemployment Premiums 80,180 80,180 80,000 80,18 0 0%
General Liability Premiums 2,072,221 2,072,221 2,051,459 2,072,221 1% Workers’ Compensation Premiums 2,689,915 2,689,915 2,940,018 2,939,914 0% Total Revenues $ 4,421,381 $ 6,322,496 $ 5,071,477 $ 5,092,315 0% Operating Transfers In $ 1,800,000 $ 1,648,622 $ - $ - 0% Total Other Financing Sources $ 1,800,000 $ 1,648,622 $ - $ - 0% Total Fund 602 $ 6,221,381 $ 7,971,118 $ 5,071,477 $ 5,092,315 0% Fund 603 - IT Replacement Fund
Investment Earnings $ 71,168 $ 138,353 $ - $ - 0%
GASB 31 Market Value Adjustmnt (286,085) (63,678) - - 0% Total Revenues $ (214,917) $ 74,675 $ - $ - 0%
Operating Transfers In $ 2,881,301 $ 3,558,484 $ 3,080,192 $ 2,856,000 -7% Total Other Financing Sources $ 2,881,301 $ 3,558,484 $ 3,080,192 $ 2,856,000 -7% Total Fund 603 $ 2,666,383 $ 3,633,159 $ 3,080,192 $ 2,856,000 -7% TOTAL REVENUES $ 184,809,517 $ 211,423,574 $ 219,123,989 $ 224,847,786 3% TOTAL OTHER SOURCES $ 16,782,317 $ 19,692,987 $ 13,097,589 $ 9,705,994 -26% GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 201,591,834 $ 231,116,561 $ 232,221,578 $ 234,553,780 1% 5City of Costa Mesa, California

544
Summary of Appropriations by Department/by Category –
All Funds (Excludes CIP)
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Department/Category
FY 21-22
Actuals
FY 22-23
Actuals
FY 23-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 24-25
Proposed
Budget
City Council
Salaries and Benefits $ 721,605 $ 675,296 $ 586,969 $ 710,908 Maintenance and Operations 150,593 158,570 161,181 161,181 Fixed Assets 4,149 727 2,000 2,000
Subtotal City Council $ 876,347 $ 834,594 $ 750,150 $ 874,089 City Manager’s Office
Salaries and Benefits
$ 6,636,335 $ 7,439,768 $ 9,264,772 $ 10,002,381
Maintenance and Operations 3,716,053 4,576,213 4,470,359 4,667,410 Fixed Assets 25,407 55,129 16,900 16,900
Subtotal City Manager’s Office $ 10,377,795 $ 12,071,110 $ 13,752,031 $ 14,686,691 City Attorney
Maintenance and Operations
965,843 988,508 1,050,000 1,086,750
Subtotal City Attorney $ 965,843 $ 988,508 $ 1,050,000 $ 1,086,750 Finance
Salaries and Benefits
$ 3,063,697 $ 3,376,822 $ 4,280,029 $ 4,763,134
Maintenance and Operations 766,643 955,049 1,273,330 1,273,330 Fixed Assets 60,089 64,339 37,300 37,300
Subtotal Finance $ 3,890,428 $ 4,396,210 $ 5,590,659 $ 6,073,764 Parks and Community Services
Salaries and Benefits
$ 4,109,052 $ 4,792,258 $ 5,683,323 $ 6,520,622
Maintenance and Operations 2,808,948 3,189,239 2,968,506 3,252,945 Fixed Assets 215 28,526 3,800 3,800
Subtotal Parks and Community Services $ 6,918,216 $ 8,010,022 $ 8,655,629 $ 9,777,367 Information Technology
Salaries and Benefits
$ 2,631,490 $ 3,641,655 $ 4,435,399 $ 4,579,074
Maintenance and Operations 510,300 568,129 610,670 610,670 Fixed Assets 1,099,026 1,784,178 3,786,211 3,723,977 Subtotal Information Technology $ 4,240,816 $ 5,993,961 $ 8,832,280 $ 8,913,721 Police Department
Salaries and Benefits
$ 47,198,919 $ 50,707,995 $ 52,034,331 $ 55,284,340 Maintenance and Operations 6,863,091 5,949,971 7,148,467 6,763,473 Fixed Assets 609,168 380,263 715,010 993,501
Subtotal Police Department $ 54,671,177 $ 57,038,230 $ 59,897,808 $ 63,041,314 Fire and Rescue Department
Salaries and Benefits
$ 27,497,513 $ 27,878,623 $ 30,632,989 $ 31,904,744 Maintenance and Operations 5,516,769 5,560,602 5,117,134 5,835,188 Fixed Assets 93,077 41,171 35,000 32,990
Subtotal Fire and Rescue Department $ 33,107,359 $ 33,480,396 $ 35,785,123 $ 37,772,922 47City of Costa Mesa, California

ATTACHMENT 3
545
Summary of Appropriations by Department/by Category –
All Funds (Excludes CIP)
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Department/Category
FY 21-22
Actuals
FY 22-23
Actuals
FY 23-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 24-25
Proposed
Budget
Development Services
Salaries and Benefits $ 6,194,331 $ 7,580,306 $ 8,786,675 $ 9,689,965 Maintenance and Operations 2,157,795 1,622,919 2,016,612 1,961,283 Fixed Assets 78,645 50,190 938,200 28,250
Subtotal Development Services $ 8,430,771 $ 9,253,415 $ 11,741,487 $ 11,679,498 Public Works
Salaries and Benefits
$ 9,712,094 $ 10,139,038 $ 13,460,866 $ 14,244,930 Maintenance and Operations 14,338,405 14,989,958 14,999,641 15,713,101 Fixed Assets 114,545 363,163 1,942,900 1,942,900
Subtotal Public Works $ 24,165,044 $ 25,492,159 $ 30,403,407 $ 31,900,931 Non-Departmental
Salaries and Benefits
$ - $ 1,950,617 $ 2,611,000 $ 2,611,000
Maintenance and Operations 7,122,528 7,952,067 8,287,899 11,291,750 Fixed Assets 18,348,736 24,442,397 14,967,478 12,931,498 Subtotal Non-Departmental $ 25,471,264 $ 34,345,081 $ 25,866,377 $ 26,834,248

TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS - ALL FUNDS
Salaries and Benefits $ 109,691,451 $ 118,182,378 $ 131,952,504 $ 140,311,099 Maintenance and Operations $ 44,916,967 46,511,225 48,534,664 52,189,891 Fixed Assets $ 20,433,057 27,210,082 22,444,799 19,713,116 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS - ALL FUNDS $ 175,041,476 $ 191,903,685 $ 202,931,967 $ 212,214,106 48 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
546

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) is a summary of the major capital and public improvements to the City’s infrastructure. A capital or public improvement project is defined as expenditures on capital assets with a value greater than $30,000 that are stationary in nature, including but not limited to, publicly owned or operated streets, highways, bridges, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, alleys, storm drains, trees and landscaping, medians, parks, playgrounds, traffic signals, streetlights, fences, walls, or other infrastructure. The CIP also includes other types of capital improvements including those specific to capital facilities, which are defined as city owned or operated buildings including, but not limited to, City Hall, Civic Center, Police Department, Old Corporation Yard, fire stations, libraries, and community centers. Also included within the CIP are consolidated building modification projects. Capital projects differentiate themselves from building modification projects in the dollar amount of the project. Individual building modification projects are minor maintenance improvements capped at $30,000, each respectively. In addition, capital projects have a wider scope of work and can span over multiple fiscal years. In such cases, continuing appropriations are a part of the annual budget to transparently track these multi -year capital projects. Other routine capital purchases, such as the purchase of new vehicles, computer hardware, and other equipment, are accounted for in other special funds, such as the Equipment Replacement Fund and IT Replacement Fund. These are not reflected in the CIP.

The CIP is important for planning and managing the City’s growth and development as well as maintaining existing infrastructure. The CIP is a living document that continues to evolve each fiscal year through the budgeting process to reflect City Council and community goals, needs, and desires. Planning for capital improvements is an ongoing process. As the City’s infrastructure condition(s) and needs change, capital programs and priorities are adjusted. New construction may be required to accommodate an increased demand or replace aging facilities , while existing infrastructure requires periodic rehabilitation, replacement, or other improvements to protect the City’s investments.

The Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget for the CIP is approximately $27.9 million across all funding sources, which is a decrease of 3.2 million or 10% percent decrease compared to the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

Furthermore, City anticipates entering into a $20 million financing opportunity for two Fire Stations for total one- year CIP of $47.9 million. The $20 million bond will finance Fire Station 2 reconstruction, Fire Station 4 Living Quarters upgrade and the generators at City Hall, Communications and Senior Center.

The Fiscal Year 2024- 25 CIP includes several major projects such as Fire Station R econstruction projects, Facilities Needs and Assessment S tudy, Emergency Communications F acility Remodel at the Police Department, Senior Center Improvements, Citywide S treet and Alley Improvements, Adams A venue Bicycle Facility project from Fairview Road to Harbor Boulevard , Fairview Road Improvement from Fair Drive to Adams Avenue, Signal Modernization for Systemic Multi-Modal Safety Improvements, Tree Planting and Small Tree Care Program and several Active Transportation projects.

The table below reflects the proposed project expenditures for the CIP as well as the estimated $79.2 million in re-budgeted funds requested to carry forward from the prior fiscal year for ongoing capital projects:

TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1-Year CIP $27,901,236
1-Year CIP Estimated Future Financing $20,000,000
Ongoing CIP (continuing appropriation) $79,184,447
Total Capital Improvement Program $127,085,683
226City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
ATTACHMENT 4
547

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
The CI
P is organized and summarized by the following sections:

BUDGET GUIDE
The CI
P Budget Guide provides a narrative overview of the CIP, including how the program is developed. The guide identifies funding sources and categories of projects. It also reflects various summaries of projects by category, district, and funding source.

CIP ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Inc
luded in this CIP section are major project-specific accomplishments from the prior fiscal year.

ONGOING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
The C
IP section includes a list of ongoing capital projects that the City Council has authorized to re-budget and carry forward from the prior fiscal year. As the implementation of some capital projects straddle fiscal years, due to complexities of project or other issues, this list is a transparent way to reflect all open projects with their corresponding remaining balance. Adoption of the CIP also provides explicit City Council approval to reappropriate these remaining project balances.

PROPOSED CA

PITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BY CATEGORY AND CITY COUNCIL GOALS Bes
t practices recommend that state and local governments establish an objective process for categorizing and prioritizing capital improvement projects. The proposed capital projects by category provides a high- level summary of the projects by voting district. The voting district reflects the actual project location; however, some projects may provide a communitywide benefit. The capital projects are also classified using the following categories (which are further defined under the Prioritization and Categorization section):
 1 – Risk to Health, Safety or Environment
 2 – Regulatory or Mandated Requirement
 3 – Grant Funding
 4 – Master Plan, General Plan
 5 – Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs
In addition, this summary includes a corresponding project status, defined below:
• New project – projects with this status are not previously budgeted projects and represent new financial commitments to fund the projects as well as ongoing operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation costs. • Existing project – projects with this status are previously budgeted projects that are not completed or span multiple fiscal years and are generally phased.
• Ongoing project – projects with this status are ongoing citywide projects that are budgeted every fiscal year in the CIP and relate to annual citywide improvements or maintenance. Examples of projects with this status include Citywide Street Improvements, Citywide Storm Drain Improvements, or Parkway Improvement Program. The project detail forms for these projects will not reflect prior budgets or expenditures as the remaining balances for these projects are reflected on the Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects summary.

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
227 City of Costa Mesa, California 548

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
This
section also reflects how all capital projects tie back to the City Council’s established goals. Each project will meet one or more of the below priorities: [THESE ARE NOT ALL THE GOALS, AND NOT IN ORDER APPROVED BY COUNCIL]
• Goal #1: Recruit and Retain High
Quality Staff
• Goal #2: Achieve Long-term Fiscally
Sustainability
• Goal #3: Strengthen the Public’s Safety
and Improvement Quality of Life
• Goal #4: Advance Environmental
Sustainability and Climate Resiliency
• Goal #5 : Diversify, Stabilize and
Increase Housing to Reflect Community
Needs
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS MAP – BY VOTING DISTRICT Fis
cal Year 2024-25 marks the transition of the CIP to reflect voting districts. A map depicting the geographical location of the capital projects with an overlay reflecting the voting districts is included in this section. The voting district reflects the actual project location; however, some projects may provide a communitywide benefit.

Citywide or “ongoing” projects are not included on this map because they are not specific to any one location or voting district.

PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE The summary of proposed capital projects by funding source provides a detailed list of each project and corresponding funding sources for Fiscal Year 2024-25. This summary is organized by the following project types:
• Facilities – projects in this category include any facility maintenance, improvements or reconstruction. • Parks – projects in this category include any maintenance, improvements, or development at park facilities.
• Parkway and Medians – projects in this category include any parkway and median landscape maintenance or curb/median construction.
• Streets – projects in this category include any street maintenance (i.e. slurry seal, rehabilitation, etc.), storm drain and water quality related improvements.
• Transportation – projects in this category include any transportation related improvements or maintenance, including active transportation projects, traffic signal maintenance and improvements, and general neighborhood traffic improvements.
228City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
549

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
CA

PITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DETAILS
This
section provides detailed information about all projects, funding levels, and funding sources. These forms are project-specific and reflect all prior, current, and future project expenditures by phase to provide a total project cost for the City Council and community.

Each project-specific form also includes an estimated financial operating impact for consideration in the budget adoption process that outlines ongoing operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation costs . These estimates are prepared per project and are subject to change based on final project design and/or construction. Certain ongoing citywide projects do not include maps or images as the maintenance districts are not specific to any one location or voting district. Additionally, these projects do not reflect prior budgets or expenditures as they are classified as “ongoing” projects. As such, the remaining balances for these projects are reflected on the Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects summary.

FIVE- YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Fiv
e-Year CIP also includes a “future” column for projects that are not developed at this time or may be implemented after Fiscal Year 2028-2029. Each fiscal year of the Five-Year CIP includes a realistic cost estimate that is within range of prior year CIP total costs. However, the cost estimates for each project are presented at current value/current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. As a result, the estimates are subject to change.

Additionally, although the schedule spans five years and future, funds for only the first year are appropri ated within the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget. The schedule provides a view of upcoming fiscal year capital projects that could be adjusted based on changing City Council and community priorities or financial capabilities. The revised 5-year CIP represents an overall well-balanced, long-term plan reflecting current City Council’s strategic goals and priorities. All projects including those in “future” years remain eligible for any grant funding, should opportunities arise.

PERCENTAGE OF GENERAL FUND BUDGET FOR CAPITAL EXPENDITURES On S
eptember 15, 2015, the City Council adopted the Capital Asset Needs (CAN) Ordinance as a result of a new policy being adopted during the preparation of the Fiscal Year 2015-16 budget. The ordinance added Article 8 to Chapter V of Title 2 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code to establish the requirement for the City to annually allocate a minimum of five percent (5%) of the General Fund revenue to a capital expenditures account and one and one-half percent (1.5%) of General Fund revenue to a capital facilities account. These funds are to be used for the construction, design, engineering, project management, inspection, contract administration and property acquisition of city owned or operated facilities.

In addition, the Capital Facilities account may also be used toward debt obligations created to fund Capital Facilities.

In the event of an economic downturn, natural disaster, emergency or other unforeseen circumstance, or if the General Fund Operating Reserve falls below the level established by resolution of the City Council pursuant to Section 2-205 of the Costa Mesa Municipal Code, the City is not required to comply with the requirements set forth above. Use of such exceptions requires approval by a supermajority of the City Council.

CIP GOALS
The CI
P is developed based on the City Council and community’s overarching goals. This is specifically reflected in the Adopted Capital Improvement Projects by Category and City Council Goals section. Additionally , the program is developed in accordance with elements in the City’s General Plan as well as City Council adopted planning documents and master plans.

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
229 City of Costa Mesa, California 550

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
CI

P BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
As par
t of the annual budget process, the Finance Department and Public Works Department partner to propose a balanced list of projects that consider the complex workloads associated with each project as well as funding sources and available resources. In collaboration with the City Manager’s Office, capital projects are recommended by departments and reviewed and evaluated by both the Finance Department and Public Works Department to ensure that the City’s priorities, infrastructure needs, financial capacity, and impact the projects have on the City’s operating budget are addressed.

Typically, a number of projects are identified and requested each year ; however, not all of the projects can be funded. An evaluation process is conducted in collaboration with each d epartment to discuss priorities and needs. A list of recommended projects is presented to the City Manager for consideration and all projects considered, but not recommended, are deferred and included in the Five-Year CIP for future consideration.

Additionally, there is a number of capital projects that may be requested and are pending other funding sources, including competitive grants. Projects that may be expecting such competitive grant funding, or funded with other similar outside resources, are not budgeted in the current fiscal year until the funding is awarded, but they are referenced in the Five -Year CIP. As a result, throughout the fiscal year, the City Council will receive recommendations to authorize new capital projects and approve budget adjustments to recognize and appropriate the competitively sourced funding.

Once the proposed list is prepared, staff presents the proposed projects at the City Council Study Session, Finance and Pension Advisory Committee, Parks, Arts and Community Services Commission, and the Planning Commission for consideration based on their respective purviews. Following their respective reviews and approval, the CIP budget is presented to City Council for consideration and adoption.

PRIORITIZATION & CATEGORIZATION
The CI
P is updated annually allowing the City to re- evaluate its priorities and needs in each subsequent year based upon the most current revenue projections and project priorities. Capital projects affecting public health and safety, and/or legal mandates receive the highest priority. The remaining projects are prioritized for final City Council consideration and adoption by City Council goals, conformance to the City’s General Plan and corresponding planning documents and approved master plans, asset conditions, and available grant funding.

The categories aiding in prioritization of these projects are outlined and defined below:
• 1 – Risk to Health, Safety or Environment – projects in this category provide an immediate health or safety concern. These are high priority projects.
• 2 – Regulatory or Mandated Requirement – projects in this category are mandated or in accordance with government regulations. Projects in this category are required and may not be defunded or deferred. • 3 – Grant Funding – projects in this category generally have competitively sourced funding and are subject to a timeframe outlined in the grant documents. Consequently, deferring these projects may result in forfeiture of grant funding.
• 4 – Master Plan, General Plan – projects in this category are in conformance with the City’s General Plan and related planning documents. They are also projects specifically identified in other approved master plans, such as park-specific master plans, Active Transportation Plan or Parks, Open Space, & Recreation Master Plan.
230City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
551

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

• 5 – Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs – projects in this category may either be annual recurring extraordinary maintenance costs or one-time/infrequent projects that improve the condition of the City’s assets. Some projects in this category include playground resurfacing and equipment replacement, street rehabilitation or sidewalk and parkway repairs. Some projects in this category may also be categorized as 1 – Risk to Health, Safety or Environment after previously being deferred.

PROJECT ESTIMATES & FUNDING SOURCES

The Public Works Department develops project cost estimates based on prior experience with similar projects or preliminary designs already completed. The cost estimates for each project are presented at current value/current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. As a result, the estimates are subject to change or escalation, particularly in the outer years of the Five-Year CIP. Occasionally the scope of the project may change resulting in higher costs than the original estimate. This also includes projected operating costs or impacts of the capital projects which are estimated per project and subject to change based on final project design and/or construction.

If project costs at the time of bid award are more than budgeted amounts, five options are considered:

• Eliminate the project; or
• Defer the project for consideration during future budget processes; or • Re-scope or change the phasing of the project to meet the existing approved budget; or • Request City Council to transfer funding from another specified project that has savings and/or is a lower priority; or
• Request City Council appropriate additional resources, as necessary, from the respective fund balances.

At project completion, any unused funds are returned to the unassigned fund balance for the respective funds.

The City employs a combination of approaches to fund its capital projects. The Finance Department and Public Works Department funding recommendations are based upon the most current revenue projections. For many smaller improvement projects, funds are appropriated from available cash on hand. Large-scale capital projects are funded through a variety of methods including long- term financing, user fees, proceeds from bond issues, grants, assessments, impact fees, and reserve balances. A list and description of capital project funding sources is provided in the Description of Funds.

CONTINGENCIES & CHANGE ORDERS

A contingency is included within applicable projects as specified on the project detail forms’ cost breakdown.

These amounts allow for budget flexibility for unanticipated concerns or cost escalations during the project, including potential change orders.

Change orders are generally the result of additions or deletions to the project, revisions to the project, and omissions or errors in the original project plans and/or specifications. This does not provide budget authority for change orders as City Council would first need to approve a budget adjustment appropriating or transferring the necessary funding.

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
231 City of Costa Mesa, California 552

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
WHAT DID WE DO DURING FISCAL YEAR 2023-24?
WEST 19TH STREET

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND NEWLY

INSTALLED RAISED CROSSWALKS
In accordance with the City’s approved Active Transportation Plan, West 19th Street from Sundance Drive to Pomona Avenue underwent street improvements, including, new bicycle facilities, high-visibility striping and markings, and pavement rehabilitation.

Green bike boxes and conflict zones provide enhanced features to allow the safe mobility of bicyclists and motor vehicles in this highly traveled corridor. Moreover, new sidewalks were installed west of Placentia Avenue, along with new driveways, which will enable accessible pedestrian traffic along this portion of West 19th Street.

New raised crosswalks were also installed at Pomona Avenue and Sterling Avenue, as well as at Meyer Place and Bay Street. The raised crosswalks will serve as traffic calming measures by extending the sidewalk across the road and bringing motor vehicles up to the pedestri an level, thereby reducing the speeds of vehicles approaching thes e crosswalks. In addition, these raised crosswalks are equipped with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) that are pedestrian actuated, which alert drivers with flashing lights. The raised crosswalks will also improve accessibility by allowing residents and students from Pomona and Rea Element ary Schools to cross at a nearly constant grade without the need for curb ramps and improve visibility of the crosswalk for approaching motorists.

Pomona Avenue and Sterling Avenue
Raised Crosswalk
Meyer Place and Bay Street Raised Crosswalk
Street Improvement and New Striping along West 19th St. 232City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
553

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

WEST 19TH STREET AND WALLACE AVE NUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION;

HAWK SIGNAL INSTALLATIONS AT WILSON PARK AND AT LIONS PARK

The Public Works Department installed a new traffic si gnal at the intersection of West 19th Street and Wallace Avenue, and new high-intensity activated cr osswalks (HAWKs) on Wilson Street adjacent to Wilson Park and on West 18th Street adjacent to Lions Park.

The installation of the new traffic signal at West 19th Street and Wallace Avenue included the installation of new concrete bulb-outs, which are intended to extend the sidewalk to narrow the roadway thereby shortening crossing distances, improving ped estrian visibility, and enc ouraging motorists to drive at slower speeds.

The new HAWK signals at Wilson Park and Lions Pa rk will provide additional safety elements to pedestrian crossings. This also provides increased awareness of pedestrians crossing to motorists.

HAWK Signal at Wilson Park HAWK Signal at Lions Park

Traffic Signal at West 19th Street and Wallace Avenue

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
233 City of Costa Mesa, California 554

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

PLACENTIA AVENUE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AND BICYCLE FACILITY

IMPROVEMENTS
Significant upgrades have been implemented along Placentia Avenue between Adams Avenue and
West 16th Street that consisted of street pavement rehabilitation and active transportation improvements.

The street improvements involved a combination of grind and overlay rehabilitation along with slurry seal. Active transportation improvements include enhanced striping, improved bicycle facilities, and upgraded crosswalks. From Adams Avenue to Wilson Street, a new Class IV cycle track was installed with green K-71 delineators forming a vertical s eparation between bicyclists and motorists. This improvement enhances safety and encourages bicycle use.

Also, a new bulb-out extension was constructed at the northwest corner of Placentia Avenue and West 19th Street, as well as the upgraded crosswalk at West 20th Street, complete with newly installed and brightly lit in-pavement lights.

Throughout this corridor, which essentially connects the northern and southern ends of the City, this street and active transportation im provement serves as an example how new insights and innovation can improve existing transportation facilities.
234City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
555

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

The design and implementation of several Active Transportation projects were completed in the 2023- 24 fiscal year which include:
 80,000 linear feet of new or improved bicycle facilities  Placentia Avenue Class II and IV bicycle facility project  West 19th Street Bicycl e Facility Improvements
 Improved and new bicycle facilities in the City along the following streets: Golf Course Drive, Orange Avenue, Santa Ana Avenue, and Wilson Street
 Pedestrian signal at West 19 th Street and Wallace Avenue  Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) on Wilson Street near Wilson Park/Fordham and on West 18th Street near Lions Park Playground
 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons for pedestr ian crossings on Santa Ana Avenue at Esther Street and on Meyer Place at Bay Street
 Raised pedestrian crosswalks on Pomona Avenue at Sterling Avenue and on Meyer Place at Bay Street
 Bicycle rack installations at City fa cilities and in commercial corridors  Design of Fairview Road Class II and IV bicycle facility from Fair Drive to Newport Boulevard  Development of a Bicycle Safety Education Program project

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
235 City of Costa Mesa, California 556

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING PROGRAM

Completed the implementation of the revised Residential Permit Parking (RPP) Program. The goal of the revised RPP Program is to implement equitable, sustainable, and efficient parking management strategies. The RPP program implementation included:

 Development of an online portal for managing permits including guest permits and special event permits.
 Procurement and installation of mobile license plate rec ognition (LPR) cameras on Police Department vehicles for enfor cement which eliminates th e need for physical permits and improves efficiency.
 Completion of residential parki ng permit renewals for streets fr om the previous residential permit program with a phased approach to requalification process.  Evaluation and implementation of new neighborhood permit zones that meet requirements of the revised residential parking program guidelines.

236City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
557

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

POLICE DEPARTMENT RANGE REMODEL PROJECT

The Police Department practice range ha s been outdated and needed significant upgrades and improvements. Construction began in late 2022 to install a new targeting and baffle system, implement a new closed-circuit camera system, improve th e air supply structures, and construct building modifications to the existing fire and safety systems. The project also incorporates a new Range Master’s office, a cleaning facility, and a larger storage area.

In addition, a new elevator has been installed to replace the existing on e that was outdated and inoperable. The new elevator will increase accessibi lity for all three floors at the Police Department and is compliant with the current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards.

The range is required to ensure Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) for firearm use and safety, as well as maintain department quarterly training requirements, and that these are met for the Police Department’s sworn officers. These new improvements will help ensur e that the City’s law enforcement officers are well trained and equipped to execute their duties.

Police Range (during construction)

Police Range (completion)

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
237 City of Costa Mesa, California 558

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)

POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION STABILIZATION AND UNDERGROUND FUEL

STORAGE TANK ABANDONMENT

During Fiscal Year 2023-24, the Public Works D epartment completed the f oundation repairs for the building addition at the Police Department. T he work was performed to correct the foundation settlement that had been occurring the last several y ears. This differential settlement had caused the windows and doorways to align uneven ly. After the repair was comple ted, which utilized the latest polyurethane jet grouting technology, the differential settlement between the floor slab and the building structure was reduced, and the soil permeability improved. Upon completion, the contractor applied exterior sealant around the windows.

In addition, the underground fuel storage tank at t he Police Department was abandoned safely and securely. Obtaining approvals from the City’s Fi re Department, Building & Safety Division, and the Orange County Health Care Agency, the City’s contractor completed a thorough tank rinsing, followed by a concrete pour and filling to maintain the tank’s structural integrity and to prevent settlement issues.

Afterwards, a new concrete walkway was constructed adjacent to the Police Department in which new grass was planted that beautified the area.

238City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
559
No. Proj # Project Name Budget Actuals
Remaining
Balance
1 200009 Corp Yard Fleet Shop Epoxy Floor 75,000$ -$ 75,000$ 2 200013 Fire Station #2 Reconstruction 3,150,000 64,883 3,085,117 3 200017 PD Carpet Replacement 500,000 - 500,000 4 200040 HVAC Replacement at Various Facilities 530,000 407,707 122,293 5 200062 Building Maintenance Projects 3,579,136 3,354,904 224,232 6 200066 PD-Removal Underground Fuel Tank 125,000 87,948 37,052 7 200072 Fire Station #1 Dehumidifier Install 250,000 55,447 194,553 8 200077 City Hall Cast Iron Drain Repipe 328,000 73,981 254,019 9 200080 City Hall Training Room 480,000 50,357 429,643 10 200085 IT Department Relocation 485,000 168,291 316,709 11 200094 Range Remodel/Update 2,448,550 2,031,421 417,129 12 200097 Electric Vehicle Fleet and Infrastructure 676,908 470,383 206,525 13 200099 Finance Security & Efficiency Reconfiguration 555,000 60,841 494,159 14 200101 Corp Yard Inst New HVAC Rooftop 50,000 5,954 44,046 15 200102 Fire Station 3 Fuel Tank Replacement 275,000 - 275,000 16 210004 Fire Stations - Minor Projects at Various Stations 452,000 290,711 161,289 17 210005 Citywide Parking Study 135,000 121,461 13,539 18 210010 Citywide Community Choice Energy Study 150,000 - 150,000 19 210012 City Hall-Paint, Carpet & Misc. Improvements 350,000 213,173 136,827 20 210013 Fire Station 4 Training Tower & Grounds
Reconstruction
5,100,000 783,254 4,316,746
21 210014 Fire Station 6 Roof Replacement 222,500 196,282 26,218 22 210015 Police Dept - Emergency Comm Facilities Remodel 330,000 73,560 256,440 23 210016 Police Dept - Parking Lot Reconfiguration 203,500 13,055 190,445 24 210017 Police Dept - Structural Foundation Repair 330,000 67,800 262,200

TOTAL ALL FUNDS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects
Remaining Balances as of 03/20/24
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
239 City of Costa Mesa, California 560
No. Proj # Project Name Budget Actuals
Remaining
Balance

TOTAL ALL FUNDS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects
Remaining Balances as of 03/20/24
25 210018 Citywide Security Camera Replacement 75,000 - 75,000 26 300005 Adams Ave Imp RMRA 2,278,862 681 2,278,181 27 300090 Safe Route to School Grant Project 788,090 - 788,090 28 300148 Citywide Bicycle Rack Improvements 250,000 71,518 178,482 29 300162 I-405 Improvements 644,400 595,515 48,885 30 300163 Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Improvements 562,800 462,751 100,049 31 300169 Newport Blvd Improvement - Victoria /22nd to 19th 1,178,820 94,496 1,084,324 32 300171 SB Newport Blvd Improvement (Mesa to Victoria) 1,965,652 97,040 1,868,612 33 300172 Pavement Mitigation I -405 Project 661,980 - 661,980 34 300173 Newport Blvd Improvement NB (22nd to Bristol) &SB (Bristol to Mesa)
2,134,145 94,186 2,039,959
35 300174 Adams at Pinecreek Improvements 3,592,953 174,666 3,418,287 36 300177 CDBG Westside Street Improvements- Wilson Street 257,000 - 257,000 37 300178 Sunflower Ave Rehab ilitation Project 2,570,782 - 2,570,782 38 300179 Adams Ave Active Transportation Project 2,500,000 130,000 2,370,000 39 300180 Bicycle Safety Education- 16 Schools 150,000 - 150,000 40 300181 Fairview Road Improvement Project 1,231,116 21,750 1,209,366 41 300182 Fairview Rd Rehab (RMRA) Project 2,780,829 - 2,780,829 42 300183 Traffic Signal Mod Baker St @ Babb St 240,000 - 240,000 43 300184 Traffic Signal at Fairview Rd and Belfast 600,000 - 600,000 44 350030 Westside Restoration Project 925,000 237,719 687,281 45 360003 Citywide Bicycle Trail Wayfinding Signage 125,000 49,937 75,063 46 370010 Mesa Del Mar Multimodal Access 300,000 4,071 295,929 47 370039 Baker/Placentia /19th/ Victoria Traffic Signal Synchronization
2,216,000 1,894,686 321,314
240City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
561
No. Proj # Project Name Budget Actuals
Remaining
Balance

TOTAL ALL FUNDS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects
Remaining Balances as of 03/20/24
48 370042 Bus Shelter Improvement 300,000 - 300,000 49 370059 W.19th Wallace Ave Traffic Signal 522,037 292,587 229,450 50 400012 Citywide Alley Improvements 3,673,019 2,533,908 1,139,111 51 400015 Citywide Street Improvements 40,245,940 30,281,370 9,964,570 52 400023 Clean CA Beautification Program 150,000 48,673 101,327 53 450010 Citywide Class II, III and IV Bicycle Projects 1,220,461 914,280 306,181 54 450013 Adams Ave Multi-Purpose Trail 325,000 153,826 171,174 55 450014 Adams Ave Bicycle Facility Project 632,547 114,712 517,835 56 450015 Bicycle/Pedestrian Infrastructure Improvements 450,000 26,873 423,127 57 450016 Mesa/Santa Ana Bicycle Facility Improvements 100,000 - 100,000 58 450017 MV/Peterson Pl Class II Bicycle Facility 100,000 - 100,000 59 470002 West 18th & Wilson Crosswalks 400,000 397,434 2,566 60 500009 New Sidewalk / Missing Link Program 891,525 691,525 200,000 61 500010 Parkway Maintenance Program Citywide 1,850,000 541,616 1,308,384 62 500017 Priority Sidewalk Repair 400,000 274,729 125,271 63 550008 Citywide Catch Basin Insert and Water Quality Improvement
473,213 217,990 255,223
64 550011 Citywide Storm Drain Improvements - Fairview Park Storm
353,055 - 353,055
65 550011 Citywide Storm Drain Improvements 2,395,842 1,444,026 951,816 66 550022 Westside Storm Drain Improvements 1,600,000 166,835 1,433,165 67 550023 Placentia Ave. Stormwater Quality Trash Full-Capture System
385,000 1,170 383,830
68 700021 Wilson TeWinkle Park Bridge Repairs 200,000 28,704 171,296 69 700027 TeWinkle Park - Skate Park Expansion 2,170,000 37,841 2,132,159 70 700054 Westside Park Development 250,000 - 250,000 Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
241 City of Costa Mesa, California 562
No. Proj # Project Name Budget Actuals
Remaining
Balance

TOTAL ALL FUNDS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects
Remaining Balances as of 03/20/24
71 700075 TeWinkle Bart Park LED Lights 130,000 - 130,000 72 700080 Park Security Lighting Replacement 299,880 251,562 48,318 73 700106 Various Parks - Sidewalk Replacement 64,686 - 64,686 74 700110 Open Space Master Plan Update 275,000 183,408 91,592 75 700111 Various Parks Rehab Parking Lots 70,000 - 70,000 76 700128 Park Sidewalk Acce ssibility Program 240,000 64,690 175,310 77 700129 Shalimar Park Improvements 250,000 19,808 230,192 78 700132 Fairview Park - Vernal Pool Restoration 407,366 291,150 116,216 79 700133 Canyon Park Inventory Management & Restoration 60,000 - 60,000 80 700134 Fairview Park Fence Sign Trail 300,000 6,008 293,992 81 700135 Fairview Park Master Plan Update 314,565 176,834 137,731 82 700137 TeWinkle Park Lakes Repairs 2,132,475 129,240 2,003,235 83 700139 Ketchum-Libolt Park Expansion 2,497,520 19,808 2,477,712 84 700140 Costa Mesa Tennis Center Improvements 620,000 - 620,000 85 700141 Costa Mesa Country Club Modernization 750,000 - 750,000 86 700142 Brentwood Park Improvements 650,000 - 650,000 87 700143 Butterfly Gardens 100,000 - 100,000 88 700144 Fairview Park-Pump Station & Westlands
Recirculation System
655,000 56,190 598,810
89 700145 Shalimar Park Expansion 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 90 700146 Various Parks - Playground Repair and Replacement 100,000 32,430 67,570 91 700147 CM Country Club Cart Path & Ground Improvements 300,000 - 300,000 92 700148 Balearic Community Center Blacktop Improvements 150,000 - 150,000 93 700149 Fairview Park Educational Hubs and Signage 90,000 - 90,000 242City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
563
No. Proj # Project Name Budget Actuals
Remaining
Balance

TOTAL ALL FUNDS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects
Remaining Balances as of 03/20/24
94 700150 Fairview Park Mesa Restoration/Cultural Resource Preservation CA- ORA- 58
2,000,000 - 2,000,000
95 700151 Fairview Park West Bluff Stabilize & Restoreation 2,000,000 6,293 1,993,707 96 700152 Jack Hammett Sport Complex LED Retrofit 900,000 - 900,000 97 700153 TeWinkle Athletic Complex Improvements 1,150,000 660 1,149,340 98 700154 Golf Course & Tennis Center Improvements 1,200,000 - 1,200,000 99 800015 Lions Park Proj ects & NCC- Library Development 38,835,504 38,404,023 431,481 100 800029 EOC Equipment Update 150,000 22,188 127,812 101 800030 Senior Center Fire Alarm Panel 71,500 34,016 37,484 102 800031 Westside Police Sub-Station Improvements 611,125 - 611,125 103 800032 Lion Park Café 2,300,000 - 2,300,000 Total Ongoing Capital Improvement Projects 169,571,283$ 90,386,836$ 79,184,447$ Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
243 City of Costa Mesa, California 564

NCity of Costa Mesa, California
244City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
565
No. Project Name Category
Dist.

No.
1 Building Modification Projects 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs All 2 City Hall - 5th Floor Air Handler Replacement 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs 3 3 City Hall - Breezeway Roof 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 3 4 City Hall - Heater(s) Replacement 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs 3 5 City Hall, Communication and Senior Center Generators Replacement 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 3 6 Civic Center - Painting, Carpet Replacement & Misc.

Improvements 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs 3 7 Costa Mesa Housing James /18th Street Property
Improvements 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs 4 8 Facilities Needs and Assessment Study 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs All 9 Fire Station 2 Reconstruction 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs 2 10 Fire Station 4 Living Quarters Reconstruction 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 1 11 Fire Stations - Minor Projects at Various Fire Stations 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 12 Norma Hertzog Community Center - AV System Repair &
Upgrades 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs 5
13 Norma Hertzog Community Center - Roof Replacement 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs 5 14 Police Department - Emergency Communications Facility Improvements 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 3 15 Police Department - Locker Rooms Remodel 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 3 16 Police Department - Sewage Liner Replace. for Comm. & West. Sub Stn. 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs 3 17 Police Department - Weather Proofing 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 3 18 Police Department - Westside Sub Station Renovation 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 3 19 Senior Center - Facility Improvements 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 5 20 Senior Center - HVAC Replacement 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 5 21 Senior Center - Roof and Roof Cap Replacement 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs 5 22 Fairview Park - Master Plan Implementation 2 - Regulatory or Mandated Requirement 5 23 Jack Hammett Sport Complex - Relevel and Restore Fields 1 and 2 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 3
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
245 City of Costa Mesa, California 566
Quality
Recruitment
Fiscal
Sustainability
Safe
Community
Environmental
Sustainability
Housing
Commitments
Fiscal Year
2024-2025
  302,000$
 140,000$
 245,000$
 350,000$
 2,000,000$
  150,000$
 140,000$
 300,000$
  10,000,000$
  8,000,000$
  150,000$
 55,000$
 334,136$
 900,000$
 400,000$
260,000$
 350,000$
 300,000$
 250,000$
 725,000$
 350,000$
 75,000$
 400,000$

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Capital Improvement Projects
By Category and City Council Goals
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
246City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
567
No. Project Name Category
Dist.

No.
24 Luke Davis Field Improvements 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 5 25 Park Sidewalk / Accessibility Program 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 26 TeWinkle Athletic Fields - Batting Cage Structure & Other Improvements 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs 1 27 Various Parks - Playground Repairs and Replacement 5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs All 28 Wimbledon Park - Exercise Equipment Replacement 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 1 29 Parkway & Medians Improvement Program 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 30 South Coast Drive Wall Repairs 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 1 31 Tree Planting and Small Tree Care Program 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 32 Westside Restoration Project 4 - Master Plan, General Plan 4&5 33 Citywide Alley Improvements 4 - Master Plan, General Plan All 34 Citywide Street Improvements 4 - Master Plan, General Plan All 35 Harbor Blvd., 17th St., and Gisler Ave. Rehabilitation Project (RMRA) 4 - Master Plan, General Plan All
36 Placentia Ave. Stormwater Quality Trash Full-Capture System 3 - Grant Funding 5
37 Adams Avenue Bicycle Facility Project from Fairview to Harbor 3 - Grant Funding 3
38 Adams Avenue Undergrounding Project 4 - Master Plan, General Plan 1 39 Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Projects 4 - Master Plan, General Plan All 40 Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Improvements 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 41 Citywide Traffic Signal Improvements 4 - Master Plan, General Plan All 42 Clean Mobility Options Program - On-Demand Transit
Services 3 - Grant Funding 4,5,6
43 Fairview Road Improvement Project from Fair to Adams 3 - Grant Funding 3 44 Fairview Road Improvement Project from Fair to Newport 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment 3 45 New Sidewalk / Missing Link Program 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All 46 Priority Sidewalk Project 1 - Risk to Health, Safety or Environment All Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
247 City of Costa Mesa, California 568
Quality
Recruitment
Fiscal
Sustainability
Safe
Community
Environmental
Sustainability
Housing
Commitments
Fiscal Year
2024-2025

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Capital Improvement Projects
By Category and City Council Goals
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
 45,000$
 50,000$
 325,000$
 50,000$
 110,000$
 175,000$
 300,000$
 150,000$
 290,000$
 700,000$
 4,800,000$
3,500,000$
 240,000$
 2,000,000$
 1,250,000$
 250,000$
 100,000$
 100,000$
 500,000$
 300,000$
1,985,000$
 100,000$
 65,000$
248City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
569
No. Project Name Category
Dist.

No.
47 Signal Modernization for Systemic Multi-Modal Safety Improvements 3 - Grant Funding All
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
249 City of Costa Mesa, California 570
Quality
Recruitment
Fiscal
Sustainability
Safe
Community
Environmental
Sustainability
Housing
Commitments
Fiscal Year
2024-2025

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Capital Improvement Projects
By Category and City Council Goals
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25
 4,340,100$
47,901,236$
250City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
571

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Map by Voting District

1 1 Citywide projects that are not specifically defined and/or larger projects (i.e. Westside projects) are not geographically displayed above as they are not specific to any one location or district.

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
251 City of Costa Mesa, California 572

NCity of Costa Mesa, California
252City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
573
Gas Tax
(HUTA)
Fund
CDBG
Fund
Park Dev.

Fees Fund
Drainage
Fund
Traffic
Impact Fee
Fund
No. 201 207 208 209 214
1 Building Modification Projects
2 City Hall - 5th Floor Air Handler Replacement
3 City Hall - Breezeway Roof
4 City Hall - Heater(s) Replacement
5 City Hall, Communication and Senior Center Generators Replacement 6 Civic Center - Painting, Carpet Replacement & Misc . Improvements 7 Costa Mesa Housing James /18th Street Property Improvements 8 Facilities Needs and Assessment Study
9 Fire Station 2 Reconstruction
10 Fire Station 4 Living Quarters Reconstruction
11 Fire Stations - Minor Projects at Various Fire Stations 12 Norma Hertzog Community Center - AV System Repair & Upgrades 13 Norma Hertzog Community Center - Roof Replacement
14 Police Department - Emergency Communications Facility Improvements 15 Police Department - Locker Rooms Remodel
16 Police Department - Sewage Liner Replace. for Comm. & West. Sub Stn. 17 Police Department - Weather Proofing
18 Police Department - Westside Sub Station Renovation
19 Senior Center - Facility Improvements
20 Senior Center - HVAC Replacement
21 Senior Center - Roof and Roof Cap Replacement
350,000 $
TOTAL FACILITIES -$ 350,000 $ - $ - $ -$ Next Category
22 Fairview Park - Master Plan Implementation 75,000 $
23 Jack Hammett Sport Complex - Relevel and Restore Fields 1 and 2 24 Luke Davis Field Improvements
25 Park Sidewalk / Accessibility Program
26 TeWinkle Athletic Fields - Batting Cage Structure & Other Improvements 27 Various Parks - Playground Repairs and Replacement
28 Wimbledon Park - Exercise Equipment Replacement
TOTAL PARKS -$ - $ 75,000 $ - $ -$ Next Category
29 Parkway & Medians Improvement Program 75,000$
30 South Coast Drive Wall Repairs
31 Tree Planting and Small Tree Care Program
32 Westside Restoration Project
TOTAL PARKWAY & MEDIANS 75,000$ - $ - $ - $ -$ Next Category
33 Citywide Alley Improvements 200,000$
34 Citywide Street Improvements 1,000,000$
35 Harbor Blvd., 17th St., and Gisler Ave. Rehabilitation Project (RMRA) 36 Placentia Ave. Stormwater Quality Trash Full-Capture System 125,000 $ TOTAL STREETS 1,200,000$ - $ - $ 125,000 $ -$ Next Category
37 Adams Avenue Bicycle Facility Project from Fairview to Harbor 240,000$ 38 Adams Avenue Undergrounding Project
39 Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Projects
100,000$
Category/Project Title

FACILITIES
PARKS

PARKWAY & MEDIANS

STREETS

TRANSPORTATION
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
253 City of Costa Mesa, California 574
Cannabis
Traffic
Impact Fees
Fund
Gas Tax
(RMRA)
Fund
Capital
Improve.

Fund
Measure M2
Regional
Fund
Measure M2
Fairshare
Fund
Jack
Hammett
Fund
Lions Park
CIP Bond
Fund
Grant Fund Future Bond/
Financing
CMHA
James/ 18th
St. Property
240 251 401 415 416 417 418 230/231/232 223 Total
302,000$ 302,000$
140,000$ 140,000$
245,000$ 245,000$
350,000$ 350,000$
2,000,000$ 2,000,000$
150,000$ 150,000$
140,000$ 140,000$
300,000$ 300,000$
10,000,000$ 10,000,000$
8,000,000$ 8,000,000$
150,000$ 150,000$
55,000$ 55,000$
334,136$ 334,136$
900,000$ 900,000$
400,000$ 400,000$
260,000$ 260,000$
350,000$ 350,000$
300,000$ 300,000$
250,000$ 250,000$
725,000$ 725,000$
350,000$
-$ -$ 4,877,000$ -$ -$ - $ 334,136$ -$ 20,000,00 0$ 140,000$ 25,701,136$ 75,000$
400,000 $ 400,000$
45,000$ 45,000$
50,000$ 50,000$
325,000$ 325,000$
50,000$ 50,000$
110,000$ 110,000$
-$ -$ 580,000$ -$ -$ 400,000 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,055,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 175,000$
300,000$ 300,000$
150,000$ 150,000$
290,000$ 290,000$
-$ -$ 790,000$ -$ 50,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 915,000$ 500,000$ 700,000$
800,000$ 3,000,000$ 4,800,000$
3,500,000$ 3,500,000$
115,000$ 240,000$
-$ 3,500,000$ 800,000$ 115,000$ 3,500,000$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,240,000$ 1,760,000$ 2,000,000$
1,250,000$ 1,250,000$
150,000$ 250,000$
Capital Improvement Projects by Funding Source
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
254City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
575
Gas Tax
(HUTA)
Fund
CDBG
Fund
Park Dev.

Fees Fund
Drainage
Fund
Traffic
Impact Fee
Fund
No. 201 207 208 209 214 Category/Project Title
40 Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Improvements
41 Citywide Traffic Signal Improvements
42 Clean Mobility Options Program - On-Demand Transit Services 43 Fairview Road Improvement Project from Fair to Adams 44 Fairview Road Improvement Project from Fair to Newport 430,000$ 625,000$
45 New Sidewalk / Missing Link Program 100,000$
46 Priority Sidewalk Project 65,000$
47 Signal Modernization for Systemic Multi-Modal Safety Improvements TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 595,000$ - $ - $ - $ 965,000$ Next Category
1,870,000$ 350,000 $ 75,000 $ 125,000 $ 965,000$ TRANSPORTATION (continued)
Total One-Year Capital Improvement Projects
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
255 City of Costa Mesa, California 576
Cannabis
Traffic
Impact Fees
Fund
Gas Tax
(RMRA)
Fund
Capital
Improve.

Fund
Measure M2
Regional
Fund
Measure M2
Fairshare
Fund
Jack
Hammett
Fund
Lions Park
CIP Bond
Fund
Grant Fund Future Bond/
Financing
CMHA
James/ 18th
St. Property
240 251 401 415 416 417 418 230/231/232 223 Total
Capital Improvement Projects by Funding Source
Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
100,000$ 100,000$
100,000$ 100,000$
500,000$ 500,000$
24,000$ 100,000$ 176,000$ 300,000$ 930,000$ 1,985,000$
100,000$
65,000$
434,010$ 3,906,090$ 4,340,100$
150,000$ -$ 1,908,010$ -$ 1,030,000$ - $ -$ 6,342,090$ -$ -$ 10,990,100$ 150,000$ 3,500,000$ 8,955,010$ 115,000$ 4,580,000$ 400,000 $ 334,136$ 6,342,090$ 20,000,000$ 140,000$ 47,901,236$ 256City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
577
Building Modification Projects Item No. 1
Type Facilities CIP Project No. 200062
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 302,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,302,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 302,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,302,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
302,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,302,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 302,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,302,000$ Funds Expended to Date: N/A Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,302,000$ Location: Citywide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-200062
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior
budgeted amounts are included below.

The attached summary of proposed maintenance projects are building modifications and maintenance projects in the 23 City-owned buildings, including those leased to outside agencies. The City administers and supervises contract services for maintaining these facilities.

Building Modification Projects consolidates many smaller projects that are minor maintenance and repair-related (i.e. painting, electrical, repair, etc.) amounting to $30,000 or less.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
257 City of Costa Mesa, California 578
Item No. 1
No. Project Title/Location Cost Description
1 Balearic Community Center $ 20,000 Paint interior of restrooms and replace restroom fixtures. 2 Balearic Community Center $ 20,000 Install AC unit in Adobe Room at the center. 3 Balearic Community Center $ 8,000 Purchase and install exterior building security cameras. 4 City Hall - Various $ 25,000 Air balancing and HVAC duct work throughout City Hall. 5 City Hall - Various $ 12,000 1st Floor IT east AH 3 shaft and bearing replacement plus motor. 6 City Hall - Various $ 12,000 3rd Floor east AH shaft and bearing replacement plus motor. 7 City Hall - Various $ 25,000 Installation of Elkay drinking fountains on each floor of City Hall. 8 Donald Dungan Library $ 25,000 Watts stopper lighting control service. (Service or complete removal) 9 Downtown Recreation Center $ 15,000 Purchase and install floor tile to the Downtown Aquatic break room. 10 Downtown Recreation Center $ 20,000 Purchase and install a shade structure at the west end of the Downtown Aquatic po ol deck. 11 Heller Park $ 5,000 Paint restrooms, interior only, plus two (2) doors. 12 Historical Society $ 25,000 Termite tent and repair. 13 Lions Park $ 5,000 Paint restrooms, interior only, plus three (3) doors. 14 Mesa Verde Park $ 15,000 Remove and replace arbor in picnic area. 15 Smallwood Park 25,000$ Remove and replace arbor attached to restrooms. 16 TeWinkle Park 10,000$ Angels Restroom: Paint restrooms, interior only, plus two (2) doors. 17 TeWinkle Athletic Complex 10,000$ Paint Men's and Women's restrooms, interior only. 18 Various Parks 25,000$ Resurface basketball, volleyball, and pickleball courts.

GRAND TOTAL 302,000$

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
Building Modification Projects
258City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
579
City Hall - 5th Floor Air Handler Replacement Item No. 2 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202501
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 140,000$ Location: City Hall - 5th Floor Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-202501
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
New Project
Replacement of City Hall 5th FloorHVAC air handler.

The existing air handler is failing and is approaching life expectency. Replacement is necessary in order for the heating, venting and air conditioning (HVAC) system to function properly.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
259 City of Costa Mesa, California 580
City Hall - Breezeway Roof Item No. 3
Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202502
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 245,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 245,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 245,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 245,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
245,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 245,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 245,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 245,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 245,000$ Location: Civic Center Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-202502
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
New Project
This project is to replace the covered walkway (Breezeway) roof between City Hall and Police Department.

This project is to replace the Civic Center walkway roof between City Hall and the Police Department. The existing roof has exceeded its life expectancy. The leaks from rains are visibly deteriorating the stucco ceiling and causing the LED light fixtures to short out and rust, which is necessitating these repairs.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
260City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
581
City Hall - Heater(s) Replacement Item No. 4
Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202503
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 350,000$ Location: City Hall Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-202503
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
New Project
This project is to replace seventy (70) failed electric heat strips in HVAC units throughout City Hall.

The current HVAC equipment is approaching life expectency. It is imperative that the equipment is replaced as soon as possible to avoid major breakdown.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
261 City of Costa Mesa, California 582
City Hall, Communication and Senior Center Generators Replacement Item No. 5 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202523
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 2,000,000$ Location: City Hall, Communications & Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Senior Center Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-TBD-19500-50910-202523
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Future Bond 1
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
New Project
Install new generators for City Hall, PD Communications and Senior Center.

There is currently no backup power at the Senior Center and the existing generators in the City Hall and Communications buildings have exceeded their useful lives. It's necessary install the new generators in these locations to provide emergency backup power to the City Hall, Senior Center and City's Communication building.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
262City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
583
Civic Center - Painting, Carpet Replacement & Misc. Improvements Item No. 6 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 210012
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 1,250,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
350,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 1,250,000$ Funds Expended to Date: 213,173$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,250,000$ Location: Costa Mesa Civic Center Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-210012
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
Existing Project
Annual repair and maintenance at Civic Center building consisting of painting, carpet replacement, and miscellaneous ongoing improvements.

Repair and replacement of worn and damaged areas at Civic Center. Areas within Civic Center experiencing high levels of wear and tear need to be replaced, such as carpeting and painting. This also funds minor reconfiguration of office spaces where needed to accommodate new staff.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
263 City of Costa Mesa, California 584
Costa Mesa Housing James /18th Street Property Improvements Item No. 7 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202504
Department: City Manager Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 4 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 140,000$ Location: James / 18th Street Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-223-11500-20635-202504
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
CMHA James/18th St.

Property
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
New Project
New paint, flooring, and other minor general repairs for seven vacant units at James / 18th Street Property.

Costa Mesa Housing Authority administers various housing projects within the City that serve to provide quality housing to low-income persons. This project is to provide funding for the new painting, flooring, and other minor general repairs for seven vacant units at James / 18th Street Property.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
264City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
585
Facilities Needs and Assessment Study Item No. 8
Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202505
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 300,000$ Location: Various City Facilities Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-202505
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
New Project
This project is to initiate a Facilities Needs and Assessment Study and developing an implementation plan.

City of Costa Mesa owns twenty-three facilities including all Civic Center buildings, six fire stations, the Corporation Yard, Historical Society, Police westside Substation, Mesa Verde Library, Donald Dungan Library, Balearic Center, Downtown Recreation Center, Senior Center, Permanent Bridge Shelter and the Costa Mesa Tennis Club. This project is to initiate a Facilities Needs and Assessment Study and developing a phased implementation plan.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
265 City of Costa Mesa, California 586
Fire Station 2 Reconstruction Item No. 9
Type Facilities CIP Project No. 200013
Department: Fire Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 2 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 10,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,750,000$ 2,275,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,275,000$ 125,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,150,000$ 10,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 13,150,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
10,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000,000$ 3,150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,150,000$ 10,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 13,150,000$ Funds Expended to Date: 64,883$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 13,150,000$ Location: Fire Station 2 Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-TBD-19500-50910-200013
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Future Bond 1
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
Existing Project
Demolition and replacement of Fire Station 2.

Fire Station 2 has served the community for several decades and has exceeded its useful life. This Fire Station is no longer effective for current operational needs due to mechanical, electrical, and plumbing deficiencies. The design of Fire Station 2 is ongoing. Funding is requested for the construction phase of this project.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
266City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
587
Fire Station 4 Living Quarters Reconstruction Item No. 10 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202524
Department: Fire Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 1 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
8,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 8,000,000$ Location: Fire Station 4 Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-TBD-19500-50910-202524
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Future Bond 1
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
New Project
Replace and rebuild Fire Station 4 living quarters
Fire Station 4 was opened in 1967 and has exceeded its useful life span. The current facility has multiple defects and is no longer sufficient for current operational needs, including multi-gender operations, privacy, ADA guidelines, seismic stability and occupational health. There are numerous electrical and plumbing needs, security concerns and infrastructure defects, including ventilation for firefighter sleeping quarters.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
267 City of Costa Mesa, California 588
Fire Stations - Minor Projects at Various Fire Stations Item No. 11 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 210004
Department: Fire Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 452,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 1,002,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 452,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 1,002,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
452,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 1,002,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 452,000$ 150,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 1,002,000$ Funds Expended to Date: 290,711$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,002,000$ Location: Fire Stations - Various addresses Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-210004
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
Existing Project
Minor to mid-level improvements and maintenance upgrades to all Fire Stations 1 through 6.

Aging facilities at all the of City's six (6) fire stations require annual maintenance, upgrades and improvements. Typical upgrades include restroom fixtures, electrical, lighting, plumbing and life safety facilities. This project provides needed funding to ensure continuing operations at all facilities.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
268City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
589
Norma Hertzog Community Center - AV System Repair & Upgrades Item No. 12 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202506
Department: Parks and Comm. Svcs Dept's Priority #: 5 of 7 District No. 5 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
55,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 55,000$ Location: Norma Hertzog Community Center Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: 1,500$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-14300-40123-202506
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
General Maintenance, software updates as
needed
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
New Project
This project is to replace the Norma Hertzog Community Center (NHCC) AV system diagnostic tool/program and code rewrite for the system's controller.

The exisitng NHCC AV system requires repairs due to occasional audio breakdowns.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
269 City of Costa Mesa, California 590
Norma Hertzog Community Center - Roof Replacement Item No. 13 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202507
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 5 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 334,136$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 334,136$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 334,136$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 334,136$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
334,136$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 334,136$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 334,136$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 334,136$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 334,136$ Location: Norma Hertzog Community Center Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-418-19500-50910-202507
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Lions Park CIP Bond Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
New Project
This project is to replace the metal roof at Norma Hertzog Community Center.

The roof shows signs of deterioration throughout the perimeter. During recent rains, the roof leaked throughout the building causing damage to equipment and ceiling tiles. It has been recommended by professional roofing repair companies that the roof be replaced.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
270City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
591
Police Department - Emergency Communications Facility Improvements Item No. 14 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 210015
Department: Police Dept's Priority #: 1 of 4 District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 900,000$ 330,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 330,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 330,000$ 900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,230,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
330,000$ 900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,230,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 330,000$ 900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,230,000$ Funds Expended to Date: 73,560$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,230,000$ Location: Police Department Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-210015
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
Existing Project
Remodel of the Emergency Communications Facility
The existing emergency communications facility serves as a vital communication link to the public and first responders.

The current facility requires a redesign and expansion to increase its functionality. This includes space for expanded locker rooms, adding shower areas and a reconfiguration and expansion of office spaces. These improvements will improve the working conditions for personnel and our public safety capabilities.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
271 City of Costa Mesa, California 592
Police Department - Locker Rooms Remodel Item No. 15
Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202508
Department: Police Dept's Priority #: 3 of 4 District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 400,000$ Location: Police Department Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-15100-50001-202508
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
New Project
Improvements of the Police Department Locker Rooms
This project would encompass the remodel of locker rooms for both male and female personnel within the main Police Department building. These locations have had long term humidity control issues, the metal lockers in these locations are experiencing rust and degradation. The scope of improvements will include a full remodel of restroom shower and existing lockers. The refurbishment of these spaces is crucial to enhance overall functionality, as the existing space is outdated, degraded and inefficient. The remodel will improve convenience, ensure safety, and create a more comfortable working environment for Police personnel.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
272City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
593
Police Department - Sewage Liner Replace. for Comm. & West. Sub Stn. Item No. 16 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 200107
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 260,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 260,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 260,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 260,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
260,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 260,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 260,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 260,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 260,000$ Location: Police Department Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-200107
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
New Project
Replace the sewage liner at the Communications Facility and Police Westside Sub Station.

The current sewage pipes are damaged and are not allowing the sewage and drain water to flow properly causing obstructions in the pipe that continuously need maintenance. Relining the pipes will improve the flow.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
273 City of Costa Mesa, California 594
Police Department - Weather Proofing Item No. 17
Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202509
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 350,000$ Location: Police Department Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-202509
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
New Project
Repair roof and subsurface leaks that are occuring in the building during rain events.

The Police Department building experienced several areas of water intrusion into the building during recent storm events. This includes several roof leaks as well as water penetrating through the basement walls in several areas. This project will repair these areas to prevent futher leakages.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
274City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
595
Police Department - Westside Sub Station Renovation Item No. 18 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 800031
Department: Police Dept's Priority #: 2 of 4 District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 475,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 475,000$ 123,750$ 300,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,423,750$ 12,375$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,375$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 611,125$ 300,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,911,125$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
550,000$ 300,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,850,000$ 61,125$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 61,125$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 611,125$ 300,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,911,125$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 4,911,125$ Location: Westside Police Sub-Station Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-800031
500000-231-19500-50910-800031
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
State Grant
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
Existing Project
Renovation of the West-Side Police Substation
The full scope of this project is a complete tear-down and redesign of the Westside Substation. The current facility is antiquated and does not meet current standards in regards to public law enforcement safety. Before embarking on the full design of a new Westside Substation, Police staff seeks to make some immediate interim improvements in one of the chambers inside the substation to create a new workspace for its officers. The improvements include office remodeling and other minor upgrades. The newly created workspace will allow the officers to interact and work conductively in dealing with Westside neighborhood issues and concerns.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
275 City of Costa Mesa, California 596
Senior Center - Facility Improvements Item No. 19
Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202510
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 5 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,000,000$ Location: Senior Center Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-202510
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
New Project
The scope of this project willl include aesthetic improvements to the facility such as painting, flooring and restroom upgrades.

This is an aging facility that is in need of aesthetic improvements including paint, new flooring and renovated restrooms.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
276City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
597
Senior Center - HVAC Replacement Item No. 20
Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202511
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 5 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 725,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 725,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 725,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 725,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
725,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 725,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 725,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 725,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 725,000$ Location: Senior Center Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-50910-202511
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
New Project
This project is for the Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) replacement at the Senior Center.

The current HVAC equipment is failing and is approaching life expectancy. It is imperative that the equipment is replaced as soon as possible to avoid a major breakdown.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
277 City of Costa Mesa, California 598
Senior Center - Roof and Roof Cap Replacement Item No. 21 Type Facilities CIP Project No. 202512
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 5 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 350,000$ Location: Senior Center Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-207-19500-50910-202512
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
CDBG Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
New Project
This project is for the roof and cap replacement at the Senior Center.

The roof shows signs of deterioration throughout the perimeter. During the last recent rains, the roof leaked throughout the building causing damage to equipment and ceiling tiles. It has been recommended by professional roofing repair companies that the roof be replaced.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
278City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
599
Fairview Park - Master Plan Implementation Item No. 22
Type Parks CIP Project No. 700134
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 7 of 7 District No. 5 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ -$ 675,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ -$ 675,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
300,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ -$ 675,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ -$ 675,000$ Funds Expended to Date: 17,834$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 675,000$ Location: FVP - Master Plan Implementation Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-208-14300-20115-700135
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Park Development Fees
Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2 - Regulatory or Mandated
Requirement
Existing Project
This project is to implement the work outlined in the Fairview Master Plan, which was adopted in 1998, revised in 2008, and is currently in the process of a third revision.

This project will implement enhancements and improvements at Fairview Park in accordance with the FVP Master Plan.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
279 City of Costa Mesa, California 600
Jack Hammett Sport Complex - Relevel and Restore Fields 1 and 2 Item No. 23 Type Parks CIP Project No. 202513
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 800,000$ Location: Jack Hammett Sports Complex Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: None
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-417-19500-40111-202513
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Jack Hammett Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
New Project
Relevel and restore Fields 1 and 2 at the Jack Hammett Sports Complex.

The conditions of the fields have deteriorated over the years due to normal settling of the soil, regular programming and special events like the Chargers' training camps. This project will level the fields and improve safety and playability.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
280City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
601
Luke Davis Field Improvements Item No. 24
Type Parks CIP Project No. 202514
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 5 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
45,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 45,000$ Location: Luke Davis Field Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: 75,000$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-40111-202514
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
Regualr maintenance of this location will be
included in the landcsape maintenance
contract.

Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
New Project
Renovation at Luke Davis Field
Renovate the infield dirt and turf at Luke Davis Field including replacement of sod, addition of clay infield mix, compacting, laser leveling and adjusting field lines to proper distances. This project would improve the quality and playability of the infield at Luke Davis Field.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
281 City of Costa Mesa, California 602
Park Sidewalk / Accessibility Program Item No. 25
Type Parks CIP Project No. 700128
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 300,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ Funds Expended to Date: N/A Total Estimated Project Cost: 50,000$ Location: Various Parks Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: None
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-40111-700128
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior
budgeted amounts are included below.

Remove and replace sidewalks at the following parks: Jack Hammett, Shiffer Park, TeWinkle Park, Wakeham Park, and Vista Park.

This project would replace cracked, raised or buckled concrete in walkways, eliminating potential hazards due to unsafe walking conditions.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
282City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
603
TeWinkle Athletic Fields - Batting Cage Structure & Other Improvements Item No. 26 Type Parks CIP Project No. 202515
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 4 of 7 District No. 1 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
325,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 325,000$ Location: TW Athletic Complex Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: 5,000$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-40111-202515
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
General Maintenance, as needed
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
New Project
This project is to improve water drainage systems, security lighting, and to add batting cages.

The TeWinkle Athletic Complex is in need of numerous repairs and enhancements. The fields are not draining properly causing water to pool/puddle on the surface. This creates increased closures that impact schedules for sports groups.

The lighting needs to be replaced as it is inadequate to provide security for sports groups and City assets. Highly requested amenities such as batting cages need to be added to modernize the complex.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
283 City of Costa Mesa, California 604
Various Parks - Playground Repairs and Replacement Item No. 27 Type Parks CIP Project No. 700146
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 300,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 300,000$ Funds Expended to Date: N/A Total Estimated Project Cost: 300,000$ Location: Various Parks Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-40111-700146
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
5 - Asset Condition, Annual Recurring
Costs
Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior
budgeted amounts are included below.

Implement necessary rehabilitation, repairs and replacement of playground equipment and playground surfacing.

This project would replace separated or missing rubber surfacing and damaged, worn out or unsafe playground equipment. The repairs would eliminate potential hazards due to unsafe conditions on the playground surface and on the playground equipment.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
284City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
605
Wimbledon Park - Exercise Equipment Replacement Item No. 28 Type Parks CIP Project No. 202516
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 1 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 110,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 110,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 110,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 110,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
110,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 110,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 110,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 110,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 110,000$ Location: Wimbledon Park Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: None
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-40111-202516
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
New Project
Remove and replace all exercise equipment stations.

The exercise equipment, which was installed in 2008, has exceeded its useful life; it is badly worn, rusted and in constant need of repair. The exercise stations are very popular and highly used by the local community. This project would improve safety and minimize the chance of future injuries and potential claims against the City. The new equipment would also enhance the aesthetics of this site and the surrounding Wimbledon Village neighborhood.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
285 City of Costa Mesa, California 606
Parkway & Medians Improvement Program Item No. 29
Type Parkway & Medians CIP Project No. 500010
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 2 of 7 District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 1,050,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 1,050,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 450,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 300,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 1,050,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,050,000$ Location: Citywide - Various Locations Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-201-19200-30130-500010
500000-401-19200-30130-500010
500000-416-19200-30130-500010
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Measure M2 Fairshare
Fund
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior
budgeted amounts are included below.

Reconstruction of damaged curb, gutter, ramps, sidewalks, and median landscape and irrigation.

Permanently repair damaged areas in the public right-of-way and construct ADA accessibility improvements. Replace existing median landscape and irrigation systems with drought-tolerant landscape that includes California native plants and state-of-the-art irrigation.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
286City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
607
South Coast Drive Wall Repairs Item No. 30
Type Parkway & Medians CIP Project No. 202517
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 2 of 7 District No. 1 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 300,000$ Location: South Coast Dr. at San Leandro Ln. Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19200-20112-202517
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
New Project
Work to repair the leaning wall along South Coast Dr. between San Leandro Ln. and Carmel Dr.

City Staff is working with the affected constituents to repair / replace the leaning wall along South Coast Dr. between San Leandro Ln. and Carmel Dr.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
287 City of Costa Mesa, California 608
Tree Planting and Small Tree Care Program Item No. 31
Type Parkway & Medians CIP Project No. 202518
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 900,000$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 900,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 900,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 900,000$ Location: City wide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: 30,000$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19500-40111-202518
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
Annual cost to maintain newly planted
trees.

Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
New Project
Tree planting and small tree care.

The City of Costa Mesa received recognition as Tree City USA by Arbor Day Foundation. In order to continue to maintain the designation as well as to improve the tree canopy in areas of City that are deficient, a Tree Planting and Young Tree Care program is proposed. The proposed funding will enable planting and care for up to 250 new trees in the City.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
288City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
609
Westside Restoration Project Item No. 32
Type Parkway & Medians CIP Project No. 350030
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 2 of 7 District No. 4&5 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 475,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 475,000$ 450,000$ 290,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,990,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 925,000$ 290,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 2,465,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
925,000$ 290,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 2,465,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 925,000$ 290,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 2,465,000$ Funds Expended to Date: 237,719$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 2,465,000$ Location: Westside Costa Mesa Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: 10,000$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19200-20112-350030
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
General Maintenance
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4 - Master Plan, General Plan Existing Project
The Westside Restoration Project is located in Districts 4 and 5 and proposes improvements designed to beautify the neighborhood, improve pedestrian and bicycle accessibility, repair aging infrastructure and enhance lighting and safety.

The restoration of the Westside is an important goal for the community. The implementation of the proposed infrastructure improvements will be the catalyst for an overall revitalization of this neighborhood, promoting Active Transportation and providing an enriching environment.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
289 City of Costa Mesa, California 610
Citywide Alley Improvements Item No. 33
Type Streets CIP Project No. 400012
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 1 of 7 District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
200,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ 500,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$ Funds Expended to Date: N/A Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,200,000$ Location: Citywide - Various Locations Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-201-19200-30112-400012
500000-416-19200-30112-400012
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Measure M2 Fairshare
Fund
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4 - Master Plan, General Plan Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

Citywide alley rehabilitation by replacing aging asphalt alleyways with concrete.

Citywide project to repair and rehabilite all of the City's alleys with concrete surfacing. Funding is requested this fiscal year to reconstruct additional alleys.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
290City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
611
Citywide Street Improvements Item No. 34
Type Streets CIP Project No. 400015
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 1 of 7 District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$ 6,500,000$ 7,000,000$ 7,000,000$ 7,500,000$ 8,000,000$ 40,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$ 6,500,000$ 7,000,000$ 7,000,000$ 7,500,000$ 8,000,000$ 40,800,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
1,000,000$ 2,500,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 15,500,000$ 800,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 14,300,000$ 3,000,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ 2,000,000$ 11,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$ 6,500,000$ 7,000,000$ 7,000,000$ 7,500,000$ 8,000,000$ 40,800,000$ Funds Expended to Date: N/A Total Estimated Project Cost: 40,800,000$ Location: Citywide - Various Locations Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-201-19200-30112-400015
500000-401-19200-30112-400015
500000-416-19200-30112-400015
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Measure M2 Fairshare
Fund
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4 - Master Plan, General Plan Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

Rehabilitation of streets consisting of: grind & overlay, leveling course and slurry seal, and reconstruction of structurally deficient areas.

This annual program provides major rehabilitation to streets and is implemented in accordance with the Pavement Management System to meet the City Council goal to reach and maintain an average Citywide Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 85.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
291 City of Costa Mesa, California 612
Harbor Blvd., 17th St., and Gisler Ave. Rehabilitation Project (RMRA) Item No. 35 Type Streets CIP Project No. 202519
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 1 of 7 District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,500,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
3,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,500,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 3,500,000$ Location: Harbor Blvd.,17th St.,and Gisler Ave. Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-251-19200-71200-202519
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Gas Tax (RMRA) Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4 - Master Plan, General Plan New Project
Street rehabilitation along Harbor Blvd., 17th St., and Gisler Ave.

Harbor Blvd., 17th St. and Gisler Ave. require pavement rehabilitation and concrete parkway improvements. Deficient areas will be reconstructed to meet City standards. Striping, markings, and bicycle facilities will be consistent with the City's Active Transportation Plan (ATP). This street improvement project will be funded with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funds. RMRA is a program that provides funding for major rehabilitation of City Streets that are in need of improvement.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
292City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
613
Placentia Ave. Stormwater Quality Trash Full-Capture System Item No. 36 Type Streets CIP Project No. 550023
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 1 of 7 District No. 5 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 240,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 590,000$ 35,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 385,000$ 240,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 625,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
125,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ 385,000$ 115,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 385,000$ 240,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 625,000$ Funds Expended to Date: 1,170$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 625,000$ Location: Costa Mesa Country Club Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: 10,000$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-209-19200-30122-550023
500000-415-19200-30122-550023
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
General Maintenance
Measure M2 Regional
Fund
Drainage Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3 - Grant Funding Existing Project
Stormwater quality trash full-capture system to be installed within Costa Mesa Country Club near Orange County Model Engineers.

Installation of a stormwater quality system to collect pollutants and debris that is commonly found in flowing stormwater.

This was an OCTA grant funded project approved in FY 2022-23. Grant funding has been received and is reflected below.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
293 City of Costa Mesa, California 614
Adams Avenue Bicycle Facility Project from Fairview to Harbor Item No. 37 Type Transportation CIP Project No. 450014
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,547$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,547$ 620,000$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,620,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 632,547$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,632,547$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
512,547$ 240,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 752,547$ 45,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45,000$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 1,760,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,760,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 632,547$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,632,547$ Funds Expended to Date: 114,712$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 2,632,547$ Location: Adams Avenue from Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-214-19300-30210-450014
500000-401-19300-30210-450014
500000-416-19300-30210-450014
500000-230-19300-30210-450014
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Harbor Blvd to Fairview
Federal Grant
Capital Improvement Fund
Measure M2 Fairshare
Fund
Traffic Impact Fee Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3 - Grant Funding Existing Project
This project will implement Class II bike lanes with buffers and Class IV cycle tracks along Adams Avenue from Harbor Boulevard to Fairview Road. This project includes Class 1 multi-use path segment on north side of Adams, median modifications, pavement slurry seal, and intersection and traffic signal modifications at Fairview/Adams. The project will complement and tie into the Adams Avenue and Pinecreek Drive Intersection Project.

The City received a competitive federal grant for construction funds of this project. This project is in accordance with the City's General Plan and the Active Transportation Plan. The project is in the final design phase. The project will improve pedestrian and bicycle mobility and access in the area.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
294City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
615
Adams Avenue Undergrounding Project Item No. 38
Type Transportation CIP Project No. 300179
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 1 of 7 District No. 1 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,500,000$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,500,000$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,750,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
2,500,000$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,500,000$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,750,000$ Funds Expended to Date: 130,000$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 3,750,000$ Location: Adams Ave from Mesa Verde W. Maintenance Cost Impact Description:
to Albatross Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19300-30225-300179
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4 - Master Plan, General Plan Existing Project
Undergrounding of utilities and power poles along Adams Avenue from Mesa Verde Drive West to Albatross Drive per SCE Rule 20A and 20B guidelines.

To underground of utlities and power poles along Adams Avenue in order to design and construct the street with sidewalks and Class I bike paths that conform to the City's Active Transportation Plan (ATP), as approved by City Council on September 7, 2021.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
295 City of Costa Mesa, California 616
Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Projects Item No. 39 Type Transportation CIP Project No. 450015
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,500,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,500,000$ Funds Expended to Date: N/A Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,500,000$ Location: Citywide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: 10,000$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-214-19300-30225-450015
500000-240-19300-30225-450015
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
Annual Maintenance
Cannabis Traffic Impact
Fees Fund
Traffic Impact Fee Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4 - Master Plan, General Plan Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior budgeted amounts are included below.

Citywide bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements to implement Active Transportation Plan and the Pedestrian Master Plan under development.

Increase access and mobility and improve safety for bicyclists and pedestrians.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
296City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
617
Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Improvements Item No. 40
Type Transportation CIP Project No. 300163
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ Funds Expended to Date: N/A Total Estimated Project Cost: 600,000$ Location: Citywide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19300-30241-300163
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior
budgeted amounts are included below.

This project includes ongoing citywide implementation of neighborhood traffic improvements including signs, approved speed humps, and minor landscape improvements to enhance the neighborhood character.

The project will enhance citywide neighborhood character and improve neighborhood traffic for all modes of transportation.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
297 City of Costa Mesa, California 618
Citywide Traffic Signal Improvements Item No. 41
Type Transportation CIP Project No. 370058
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ Funds Expended to Date: 50,000$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 150,000$ Location: Citywide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19300-30241-370058
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
General Maintenance
Capital Improvement Fund
Measure M2 Fairshare
Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4 - Master Plan, General Plan Existing Project
Construct traffic signal improvements citywide to upgrade traffic signal infrastructure for all modes of travel as needed.

Traffic signal improvement upgrades are needed at several locations citywide to continue operational efficiency for all modes of travel which are not already funded by grants.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
298City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
619
Clean Mobility Options Program - On-Demand Transit Services Item No. 42 Type Transportation CIP Project No. 202520
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 4,5,6 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 1,500,000$ Location: Districts 4, 5, 6 Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-232-19300-30241-202520
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Other Grant
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3 - Grant Funding New Project
This project will provide funds to create and operate an “on-demand” transit services with an all-electric vehicle fleet to primarily disadvantaged and low-income communities west of Newport Boulevard. The service area in Costa Mesa will include key destinations including healthcare, transportation hubs, grocery, senior living facilities, and other destinations. The proposed initial operating plan would have a total of three electric vehicles operating up to 10 hours per day, 7 days a week, with adjustments made based on feedback from the community and service data to best align with the needs of the community.

The CMO Pilot Program is a statewide initiative that provides voucher-based funding for zero-emission carsharing, innovative transit services, and on-demand ride services in California’s historically underserved communities. The City received $1.5 million in funding to create and implement an on-demand shuttle pilot program for areas designated as Disadvantaged or Low-Income to provide transit connections to OCTA bus routes, grocery stores, shopping, and job centers in Costa Mesa.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
299 City of Costa Mesa, California 620
Fairview Road Improvement Project from Fair to Adams Item No. 43 Type Transportation CIP Project No. 202521
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 1,999,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,999,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 1,999,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,299,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ 240,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 240,000$ 24,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 176,000$ 1,759,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,935,000$ -$ 300,000$ 1,999,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,299,000$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 2,299,000$ Location: Fairview Road from Fair to Adams Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-214-19300-30225-202521
500000-401-19300-30225-202521
500000-416-19300-30225-202521
500000-230-19300-30225-202521
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
General Maintenance
Federal Grant
Capital Improvement Fund
Measure M2 Fairshare
Fund
Traffic Impact Fee Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3 - Grant Funding New Project
The project will design and construct active transportation improvements along Fairview Road from Adams Avenue to Fair Drive. Proposed improvements include improved bicycle facilities, green bicycle conflict zone striping, high visibility pedestrian crossings, pedestrian upgrades, and transit stop improvements.

The City received a competitive federal grant for this project. This project is in accordance with the City's General Plan and the Active Transportation Plan. The project will improve pedestrian and bicycle mobility and access in the area.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
300City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
621
Fairview Road Improvement Project from Fair to Newport Item No. 44 Type Transportation CIP Project No. 300181
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. 3 Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,231,116$ 1,985,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,216,116$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,231,116$ 1,985,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,216,116$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
430,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 430,000$ 900,000$ 625,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,525,000$ 930,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 930,000$ 331,116$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 331,116$ 1,231,116$ 1,985,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,216,116$ Funds Expended to Date: 21,750$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 3,216,116$ Location: Fairview Road from Fair to Newport Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: 5,000$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-201-19200-30112-300181
500000-214-19200-30112-300181
500000-416-19200-30112-300181
500000-230-19200-30112-300181
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
General Maintenance
Federal Grant
Measure M2 Fairshare
Fund
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
Traffic Impact Fee Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
Existing Project
This project will construct Class IV cycle tracks on Fairview Road by reducing the number of vehicle lanes from six lanes to four lanes from Fair Drive to Wilson Street. From Wils on Street to Newport Boulevard, the project will construct bicycle improvements including buffered bike lanes. The pedestrian design improvements will include high-visibility crosswalks, a midblock pedestrian hybrid beacon (HAWK Signal) between Wilson Street and Fair Drive with a pedestrian refuge island, and bus boarding islands to improve pedestrian connectivity and safety.

This project is in accordance with the City's General Plan and the Active Transportation Plan. The project will improve pedestrian and bicycle safety and mobility in the area.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
301 City of Costa Mesa, California 622
New Sidewalk / Missing Link Program Item No. 45
Type Transportation CIP Project No. 500009
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 3 of 7 District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ Funds Expended to Date: N/A Total Estimated Project Cost: 600,000$ Location: Citywide - Various Locations Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-201-19200-30130-500009
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior
budgeted amounts are included below.

This program includes the construction of new sidewalk at locations where short segments are missing.

This program allows for the construction of new sidewalk mid-block where short segments are missing to provide a continuous path of travel or for entire blocks at or near high priority areas, such as around schools, hospitals, convalescent homes, public facilities, bus routes, and major highways.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
302City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
623
Priority Sidewalk Project Item No. 46
Type Transportation CIP Project No. 500017
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: 2 of 7 District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 65,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 565,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 65,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 565,000$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
65,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 565,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 65,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 565,000$ Funds Expended to Date: N/A Total Estimated Project Cost: 565,000$ Location: Citywide - Various Locations Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-201-19200-30130-500017
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
None
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1 - Risk to Health, Safety or
Environment
Ongoing citywide project; therefore, no prior
budgeted amounts are included below.

This project is an ongoing maintenance program to remove and replace damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk.

A sidewalk maintenance program is essential to remove and replace damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk. This program is intended to provide funds to repair the damaged concrete improvements within the City right-of-way. These funds will be used to perform the necessary parkway repairs where staff has been directed to remove trees by the Parks & Community Services Commission. Additionally, ADA accessibility ramps are constructed as staff receives individual requests.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
303 City of Costa Mesa, California 624
Signal Modernization for Systemic Multi-Modal Safety Improvements Item No. 47 Type Transportation CIP Project No. 202522
Department: Public Works Dept's Priority #: (? of ?) District No. All Category: Project Status:

Project
Description:

Project
Justification:
2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 4,040,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,040,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,340,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,340,100$ 2023-24
and Prior
Proposed
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Future Total
434,010$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 434,010$ 3,906,090$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,906,090$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,340,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,340,100$ Funds Expended to Date: -$ Total Estimated Project Cost: 4,340,100$ Location: Citywide Maintenance Cost Impact Description:

Annual Cost Impact: -$
Project Account (Account-Fund-Org-Program-Project):
500000-401-19300-30241-202522
500000-230-19300-30241-202522
Insert image(s) of map, and or photos within the boundaries of this merged cell Total Funding Sources
General Maintenance
Federal Grant
Capital Improvement Fund
Land acquisition
Design, permits
Construction
Contingency
Other

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
3 - Grant Funding New Project
This project will design and implement proven safety countermeasures for all users including implementing Leading Pedestrian Intervals at 49 intersections, installing countdown pedestrian signal heads at 43 intersections, installing new retro-reflective border signal backplates to enhance visibility and compliance, installing battery backup systems at major intersections to keep signals and pedestrian crossings active during unexpected power outages, and installing emergency vehicle preemption devices at 30 intersections to complete the network for City’s emergency services.

This is a competitive grant project awarded from the State of California’s Highway Safety Improvement Program. The purpose of this grant project is to achieve a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries for all modes of travel on public roads.

Expenditure Breakdown
Total Estimated Costs
Funding Sources
304City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
625
FY 2024-25
1 1 City Hall - HVAC Retrofit Project -$
1 2 City Hall - Solar Rooftop / Canopy Project -$
1 3 Citywide - Costa Mesa Green Business Program -$
1 4 Citywide - Drought Resistant Landscape and Vegetation Replacement -$ 1 5 Citywide - Energy Efficiency Projects -$
1 6 Fire Stations - Electric Vehicle Solar Charging Stations -$ 1 7 Various Facilities - Electric Vehicle Charging Stations -$ 1 TOTAL ENERGY & SUSTAINABILITY -$
1 Next Category
1 8 Balearic Center - ADA Upgrades (Exterior Restrooms) -$ 1 9 Balearic Center - Fire Protection Sprinklers -$
1 10 Balearic Center - Install New HVAC Unit -$
1 11 Bridge Shelter - HVAC Automation -$
1 12 Building Modification Projects 302,000$
1 13 City Hall - 1st Floor Restroom and ADA Improvements -$ 1 14 City Hall - 5th Floor Air Handler Replacement 140,000$ 1 15 City Hall - 5th Floor Office Remodel -$
1 16 City Hall - All Doors Lock Replacement and Re-Key -$ 1 17 City Hall - Breezeway Roof 245,000$
1 18 City Hall - Curtain and Window Improvements (1 floor per year) -$ 1 19 City Hall - Heater(s) Replacement 350,000$
1 20 City Hall - Remodel Outdoor Patio Landing -$
1 21 City Hall - Training Room -$
1 22 City Hall, Communication and Senior Center Generators Replacement 2,000,000$ 1 23 Civic Center - Painting, Carpet Replacement & Misc. Improvements 150,000$ 1 24 Corp Yard - Construction of Breakroom and Additional Office Spaces -$ 1 25 Corp Yard - Fleet Extend Bay #2 on North Side of Building for Fire Apparatus -$ 1 26 Corp Yard - Fleet Shop Doors -$
1 27 Corp Yard - Fleet Shop Hoists -$
1 28 Corp Yard - Fleet Shop Work Station -$
1 29 Corp Yard - Old Facility Perimeter Concrete Improvements -$ 1 30 Costa Mesa Country Club Grounds Improvements -$
1 31 Costa Mesa Country Club Modernization -$
1 32 Costa Mesa Housing James /18th Street Property Improvements 140,000$ 1 33 Downtown Aquatic Center Pool Gutter Grates -$
1 34 Downtown Recreation Center Lighting Upgrade -$
1 35 Facilities Needs and Assessment Study 300,000$
1 36 Fire Station 2 Reconstruction 10,000,000$
1 37 Fire Station 3 Apparatus Door Replacement -$
1 38 Fire Station 4 Living Quarters Reconstruction 8,000,000$ Category/Project Title

ENERGY & SUSTAINABILITY

FACILITIES
Cost estimates are presented at current value / current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. Although the schedule spans five years and future, funds for only the first year are appropriated within the FY 2024-25 Budget.

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
305 City of Costa Mesa, California 626
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 Future Total 600,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ 1,800,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 200,000$ 400,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 600,000$ 1,400,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 300,000$ 700,000$ 150,000$ 235,000$ -$ -$ -$ 385,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 750,000$ 1,450,000$ 1,535,000$ 1,100,000$ 500,000$ 1,250,000$ 5,835,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 160,000$ 160,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 165,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 165,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,302,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 245,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ 550,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 225,000$ 225,000$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 900,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ 400,000$ 450,000$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ 375,000$ -$ -$ -$ 375,000$ -$ 40,000$ -$ -$ -$ 40,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 180,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 180,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000,000$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 Through Fiscal Year 2028-2029 Cost estimates are presented at current value / current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. Although the schedule spans five years and future, funds for only the first year are appropriated within the FY 2024-25 Budget. 306City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
627
FY 2024-25 Category/Project Title
1 39 Fire Station 6 Repair Perimeter Walls -$
1 40 Fire Stations - Minor Projects at Various Fire Stations 150,000$ 1 41 Mesa Verde Library - ADA Compliance Improvements -$ 1 42 Mesa Verde Library - Roof Replacement -$
1 43 Norma Hertzog Community Center - AV System Repair & Upgrades 55,000$ 1 44 Norma Hertzog Community Center - Roof Replacement 334,136$ 1 45 Police Department - Emergency Communications Facility Improvements 900,000$ 1 46 Police Department - Emergency Operations Center Equipment Update -$ 1 47 Police Department - Locker Rooms Remodel 400,000$
1 48 Police Department - Main Floor Breakroom Remodel -$ 1 49 Police Department - Property & Evidence Warehouse Remodel -$ 1 50 Police Department - Sewage Liner Replace. for Comm. & West. Sub Stn. 260,000$ 1 51 Police Department - Weather Proofing 350,000$
1 52 Police Department - Westside Sub Station Renovation 300,000$ 1 53 Senior Center - Facility Improvements 250,000$
1 54 Senior Center - HVAC Replacement 725,000$
1 55 Senior Center - Painting and Power Wash -$
1 56 Senior Center - Roof and Roof Cap Replacement 350,000$ 1 57 Various Facilities - HVAC Replacement Program -$
1 TOTAL FACILITIES 25,701,136$
1 Next Category
1 58 Balearic Community Center - Tot Lot Playground Improvements -$ 1 59 Balearic Community Center - Asphalt Surfacing -$
1 60 Bark Park Renovation -$
1 61 Butterfly Gardens -$
1 62 Davis School Field & Lighting - Design & Construction -$ 1 63 Del Mesa Park - Replace Existing Playground Equipment -$ 1 64 Del Mesa Park - Replace Walkway Lights -$
1 65 Fairview Park - Asphalt Trail Rehabilitation -$
1 66 Fairview Park - Educational Hubs and Signage -$
1 67 Fairview Park - Fencing, Signage, and Trail Restoration -$ 1 68 Fairview Park - Master Plan Implementation 75,000$ 1 69 Fairview Park - Mesa Restoration & Cultural Resource Preservation CA-ORA-58 -$ 1 70 Gisler Park - Light Poles Replacement -$
1 71 Harper Park - Playground Replacement -$
1 72 Heller Park - Replace Existing Restroom -$
1 73 Jack Hammett Sport Complex - Relevel and Restore Fields 1 and 2 400,000$ 1 74 Kaiser Lighting and Turf -$
1 75 Lions Park - Open Space Improvements -$
1 76 Luke Davis Field Improvements 45,000$
PARKS
FACILITIES (continued)
Cost estimates are presented at current value / current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. Although the schedule spans five years and future, funds for only the first year are appropriated within the FY 2024-25 Budget.

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
307 City of Costa Mesa, California 628
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 Future Total

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 Through Fiscal Year 2028-2029 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 550,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ 550,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 334,136$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 900,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 150,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 260,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,300,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 725,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,600,000$ 7,670,000$ 2,465,000$ 900,000$ 700,000$ 4,735,000$ 42,171,136$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 470,000$ -$ -$ 470,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,500,000$ 4,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 88,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 88,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 375,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ -$ 375,000$ -$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ 5,000,000$ 8,000,000$ 95,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 95,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,600,000$ 8,600,000$ 50,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ 650,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45,000$ Cost estimates are presented at current value / current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. Although the schedule spans five years and future, funds for only the first year are appropriated within the FY 2024-25 Budget. 308City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
629
FY 2024-25 Category/Project Title
1 77 Marina View Park - Playground Replacement -$
1 78 Moon Park - Replace Existing Playground Equipment (2 areas) -$ 1 79 Park Security Lighting Replacement Program -$
1 80 Park Sidewalk / Accessibility Program 50,000$
1 81 Parsons - Lighting and Turf -$
1 82 Shalimar Park Improvements -$
1 83 Shiffer Park - Replace Existing Playground Equipment (2 Areas) -$ 1 84 Shiffer Park - Restroom Improvements -$
1 85 Smallwood Park - Improvements -$
1 86 TeWinkle Athletic Fields - Batting Cage Structure & Other Improvements 325,000$ 1 87 TeWinkle Park - Amphitheater -$
1 88 TeWinkle Park - Drainage Swale - North Boundary -$ 1 89 TeWinkle Park - Landscape Buffer North Boundary -$ 1 90 TeWinkle Park - Landscape Median Improvements -$
1 91 TeWinkle Park - Security Lighting Project -$
1 92 Various Parks - Parking Lot Rehabilitation -$
1 93 Various Parks - Playground Repairs and Replacement 50,000$ 1 94 Various Parks - Rainbird Irrigation Controller Replacement -$ 1 95 Victoria Corridor Park Development -$
1 96 Vista Park - Picnic Shelter -$
1 97 Wakeham Park - Playground and Planter Improvements -$ 1 98 Westside Park Development -$
1 99 Westside Skate Park -$
1 100 Wilson Park - Replace Existing Restroom w/Pre-Fabricated -$ 1 101 Wimbledon Park - Exercise Equipment Replacement 110,000$ 1 TOTAL PARKS 1,055,000$
1 Next Category
1 102 Arlington Dr. at Newport Blvd. - Streetscape Improvements -$ 1 103 Arlington Drive - Bark Park Parking Lot Landscape Improvements -$ 1 104 Citywide Neighborhood Entry Improvements -$
1 105 Fairview Road - Median Landscape Rehabilitation -$ 1 106 Gisler Avenue - Bike Trail Landscape -$
1 107 Gisler Avenue - Landscape Improvements -$
1 108 Newport Boulevard Landscape Improvements - 19th St. to Bristol St. -$ 1 109 Newport Boulevard Landscape Improvements - S/O 17th Street -$ 1 110 Parkway & Medians Improvement Program 175,000$
1 111 South Coast Drive Wall Repairs 300,000$
1 112 Tree Planting and Small Tree Care Program 150,000$ 1 113 Westside Restoration Project 290,000$
1 TOTAL PARKWAY & MEDIANS 915,000$

PARKWAY & MEDIANS
PARKS (continued)
Cost estimates are presented at current value / current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. Although the schedule spans five years and future, funds for only the first year are appropriated within the FY 2024-25 Budget.

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
309 City of Costa Mesa, California 630
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 Future Total

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 Through Fiscal Year 2028-2029 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ 900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,500,000$ 5,500,000$ -$ 350,000$ 3,500,000$ -$ -$ 3,850,000$ -$ 175,000$ -$ -$ -$ 175,000$ -$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 275,000$ 275,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 275,000$ 275,000$ 50,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 450,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 300,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 1,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 165,000$ 165,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 190,000$ 190,000$ 3,000,000$ 3,350,000$ 2,350,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ 12,700,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 500,000$ -$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 110,000$ 5,483,000$ 8,200,000$ 7,470,000$ 3,250,000$ 30,900,000$ 56,358,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 180,000$ 180,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 300,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,100,000$ 10,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 110,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 165,000$ 165,000$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$ 25,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ 275,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 175,000$ 1,050,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 900,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,540,000$ 910,000$ 1,475,000$ 775,000$ 775,000$ 2,370,000$ 7,220,000$ Cost estimates are presented at current value / current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. Although the schedule spans five years and future, funds for only the first year are appropriated within the FY 2024-25 Budget. 310City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
631
FY 2024-25 Category/Project Title
1 Next Category
1 114 Brentwood Avenue - Storm Drain System -$
1 115 Cherry Lake Storm Drain System - Phase I, II & III -$ 1 116 Cherry Lake Storm Drain System - Phase IV & V -$
1 117 Citywide Alley Improvements 700,000$
1 118 Citywide Storm Drain Improvements -$
1 119 Citywide Street Improvements 4,800,000$
1 120 Harbor Blvd., 17th St., and Gisler Ave. Rehabilitation Project (RMRA) 3,500,000$ 1 121 Placentia Ave. Stormwater Quality Trash Full-Capture System 240,000$ 1 122 Water Quality Improvement Project -$
1 123 Westside Storm Drain Improvements -$
1 TOTAL STREETS 9,240,000$
1 Next Category
1 124 Adams Avenue Active Transportation (ATP) Improvements (Royal Palm to Santa Ana River -$ 1 125 Adams Avenue Bicycle Facility Project from Fairview to Harbor 2,000,000$ 1 126 Adams Avenue Undergrounding Project 1,250,000$
1 127 Airport Channel / Delhi Channel Multi-Use Trail -$ 1 128 Baker - Coolidge Ave Traffic Signal Modifications -$ 1 129 Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Projects 250,000$ 1 130 Bristol St. / Baker St. - Intersection Improvement (Add EBT, WBT) -$ 1 131 Bristol St. / I-405 NB - Ramps (Add WBR) -$
1 132 Bristol St. / Paularino Ave. (Add 2nd WBL) -$
1 133 Bristol St. / Sunflower Ave. - Intersection Improvement (Add 3rd NBL) -$ 1 134 Bristol Street (Bear St. to Santa Ana Av.) - Bicycle Facility -$ 1 135 Citywide Bicycle Rack Improvements -$
1 136 Citywide Class II, III and IV Bicycle Projects -$ 1 137 Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Improvements 100,000$ 1 138 Citywide Traffic Signal Improvements 100,000$
1 139 Clean Mobility Options Program - On-Demand Transit Services 500,000$ 1 140 Costa Mesa ITS Improvements (Communications, Central Sys. CCTV) -$ 1 141 E. 17th St. / Irvine Ave. - Intersection Improvement (Add SBR, EBR) -$ 1 142 Eastside Traffic Calming (Cabrillo St., 18th St., 22nd St.) -$ 1 143 Fairview Channel Trail - Placentia Ave (n/o park) to Placentia Ave (s/o park) -$ 1 144 Fairview Road Improvement Project from Fair to Adams 300,000$ 1 145 Fairview Road Improvement Project from Fair to Newport 1,985,000$ 1 146 Fairview Road. / Wilson St. - Improvements (Add EBT, WBT) -$ 1 147 Gisler Ave Class IV Cycle Tracks from Gibraltar Ave to Harbor Blvd -$ 1 148 Gisler Ave Multi-use Trail from Gisler Ave Class II facility to Fairview Rd -$

STREETS

TRANSPORTATION
Cost estimates are presented at current value / current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. Although the schedule spans five years and future, funds for only the first year are appropriated within the FY 2024-25 Budget.

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
311 City of Costa Mesa, California 632
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 Future Total

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 Through Fiscal Year 2028-2029 -$ -$ -$ -$ 793,040$ 793,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,721,600$ 2,721,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,009,360$ 2,009,360$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,000,000$ 15,000,000$ 6,500,000$ 7,000,000$ 7,000,000$ 7,500,000$ 8,000,000$ 40,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 240,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,700,000$ 1,700,000$ 8,100,000$ 8,600,000$ 8,700,000$ 8,700,000$ 9,300,000$ 30,324,000$ 74,864,000$ -$ 5,900,000$ -$ -$ -$ 5,900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,540,000$ 2,540,000$ 90,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 90,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 962,500$ 962,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 90,000$ 90,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,210$ 300,210$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,130,000$ 1,130,000$ -$ 75,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ 525,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 175,000$ 100,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 100,000$ 800,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 500,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,200,000$ 2,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,080,000$ 1,080,000$ 1,999,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,299,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,985,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,525,000$ 1,525,000$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 400,000$ Cost estimates are presented at current value / current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. Although the schedule spans five years and future, funds for only the first year are appropriated within the FY 2024-25 Budget. 312City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
633
FY 2024-25 Category/Project Title
1 149 Greenville-Banning Channel Phase 1 (Sunflower Ave to South Coast Drive) -$ 1 150 Greenville-Banning Channel Phase 2 (Santa Ana River Trail to South Coast Dr.) -$ 1 151 Harbor Blvd. / Adams Ave. - Intersection Improvements (Add NBL, NBR) -$ 1 152 Harbor Blvd. / Gisler Ave. - Intersection Improvements (Add SBR) -$ 1 153 Harbor Blvd. / MacArthur - Bus Turnout -$
1 154 Harbor Blvd. / South Coast Dr. - Intersection Improvement (Add EBR) -$ 1 155 Harbor Blvd. / Sunflower Ave. - Intersection Improvement (Add EBR, WBR) -$ 1 156 Hyland Ave. / I-405 NB Ramp & South Coast Drive (Add 2nd WBT) -$ 1 157 Mesa Del Mar Multi-Modal Access and Circulation Improvements -$ 1 158 Mesa Drive and Santa Ana Ave Bicycle Facility Improvement -$ 1 159 Mesa Verde Drive East/ Peterson Place Class II Bicycle Facility -$ 1 160 New Sidewalk / Missing Link Program 100,000$
1 161 Newport Blvd. / 17th St. (Add NBR) -$
1 162 Newport Blvd. Northbound at Del Mar (Add WBTR) -$ 1 163 Newport Blvd. Northbound/22nd St. (Add WBTR, convert NBT to NBTR) -$ 1 164 Newport Blvd. Southbound at Fair Dr. (Add 2nd SBR) -$ 1 165 Orange Coast College West Bicycle Trail -$
1 166 Paularino Channel - Multipurpose Trail -$
1 167 Placentia Av. / 19th St. (Add SBR) -$
1 168 Placentia Av. / 20th St. HAWK Signal -$
1 169 Placentia Ave Multi-Use Path from Joann Trail to Estancia High School -$ 1 170 Priority Sidewalk Project 65,000$
1 171 Santa Ana / Delhi Channel Multi-Use Trail from Santa Ana Ave to east City boundary -$ 1 172 Signal Modernization for Systemic Multi-Modal Safety Improvements 4,340,100$ 1 173 Signal System Upgrade - Paularino, Fair, Wilson, Anton -$ 1 174 SR-55 Frwy. N/B / Baker St. - Intersection Improvement (Add NBL, EBL) -$ 1 175 SR-55 Frwy. N/B / Paularino Ave. - Intersection Improvement (Add WBR) -$ 1 176 SR-55 Frwy. S/B / Baker St. - Intersection Improvement (Add SBR) -$ 1 177 SR-55 Frwy. S/B / Paularino Ave. - Intersection Improvement (Add SBR) -$ 1 178 Superior Av. / 17th St. (Convert WBT to WBTL, NBR) -$ 1 179 Susan Street Multi-Use Path from I-405 to South Coast Drive -$ 1 180 Vanguard Way / Santa Isabel Ave. (Fair Dr. to Irvine Av.) - Bicycle Facility -$ 1 181 West 17th St. Widening - (Newport Boulevard to Placentia Avenue) -$ 1 182 Wilson Street (Fairview Rd. to Santa Ana Av.) - Bicycle Facility -$ 1 183 Wilson Street Widening - from College Ave. to Fairview Rd. -$ 1 TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 10,990,100$
1 Next Category
47,901,236$ 1Total Five-Year Capital Improvement Projects TRANSPORTATION (continued)
Cost estimates are presented at current value / current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. Although the schedule spans five years and future, funds for only the first year are appropriated within the FY 2024-25 Budget.

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
313 City of Costa Mesa, California 634
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 Future Total

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 Through Fiscal Year 2028-2029 -$ -$ -$ -$ 870,000$ 870,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,280,000$ 3,280,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,000,000$ 6,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,895,000$ 4,895,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 396,000$ 396,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,167,200$ 2,167,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 920,000$ 920,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 863,000$ 863,000$ 500,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ -$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$ 225,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 225,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 132,000$ 132,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,000$ 15,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 800,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 760,000$ 760,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,500,000$ 4,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 386,000$ 386,000$ -$ 175,000$ -$ -$ -$ 175,000$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 565,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 540,000$ 540,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,340,100$ -$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ 900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,370,000$ 1,370,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 642,750$ 642,750$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 625,350$ 625,350$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 413,730$ 413,730$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 700,000$ 700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 420,000$ 420,000$ -$ 60,000$ -$ -$ -$ 60,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000,000$ 20,000,000$ 4,014,000$ 9,910,000$ 1,775,000$ 1,325,000$ 64,548,740$ 92,562,840$ 28,127,000$ 32,285,000$ 20,720,000$ 15,850,000$ 134,127,740$ 279,010,976$ Cost estimates are presented at current value / current dollars and are not escalated for inflation. Although the schedule spans five years and future, funds for only the first year are appropriated within the FY 2024-25 Budget. 314City of Costa Mesa, California
capItal IMproveMent
prograM
635
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 FY 21-22
Adopted
FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 23-24
Amended
FY 24-25
Proposed
City Council
Council Member 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Management Analyst/Chief of Staff* 1.00 1.00 - Management Aide*
Management Analyst* 1.00 1.00 - - -
Total City Council 10.00 10.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
*Constituent Services staff transferred to City Manager’s Office City Manager’s Office
City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Manager 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant to the City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Central Services Supervisor 1.00 1.00 - - -
City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Community Outreach Worker - 2.00 2.00 5.00 7.00
Community Outreach Supervisor - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy City Clerk 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Deputy City Manager - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Energy and Sustainability Service Manager - - - 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant to the City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Graphics Designer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Human Resources Administrator 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Human Resources Analyst 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Human Resources Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Human Resources Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Human Resources Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Management Aide - - 2.00 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00
Neighborhood Improvement Manager - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Specialist II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Principal Human Resources Analyst 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Public Affairs Manager 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
Real Property Manager - - 1.00 - -
Senior Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 2.00
Senior Code Enforcement Officer - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Video Production Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Video Production Specialist 1.00 1.00 2.00 - -
Multimedia Specialist - 2.00 2.00
Website Coordinator/ Programmer Analyst I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total City Manager’s Office 30.00 37.00 43.00 47.00 49.00 *Constituent Services staff transferred in City Manager’s Office * Energy and Sustainability Service Manager transferred in from Public Works 58City of Costa Mesa, California

ATTACHMENT 5
636
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 FY 21-22
Adopted
FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 23-24
Amended
FY 24-25
Proposed
Finance Department
Finance Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accounting Specialist I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accounting Specialist II 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Accounting Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 - -
Administrative Assistant (CON) 1.00 1.00
Assistant Finance Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Budget and Purchasing Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Budget Analyst 2.00 - - - -
Business License Inspector - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Buyer 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Finance Manager - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Finance Officer- Accounting - - - 1.00 1.00
Finance Officer- Payroll (CON) - - - 1.00 1.00
Finance Officer- Purchasing - - - 1.00 1.00
Finance Officer- Revenue - - - 1.00 1.00
Payroll Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Payroll Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 - -
Permit Processing Specialist 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Purchasing Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 - -
Revenue Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 - -
Senior Accountant - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Budget Analyst - 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Senior Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 -
Total Finance Department 23.00 24.00 25.00 26.00 26.00 Parks And Community Services Department
Parks and Community Services Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Arts Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Recreation Supervisor 3.00 3.00 -
Community Outreach Worker 2.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fairview Park Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Worker 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 - - -
Neighborhood Improvement Manager 1.00 - - - -
Office Specialist II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation Coordinator* 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Recreation Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation Specialist - - 7.00 8.00 8.00
Recreation Supervisor 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Senior Code Enforcement Officer 1.00 - - - -
Senior Management Analyst - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
59 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
637
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 FY 21-22
Adopted
FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 23-24
Amended
FY 24-25
Proposed
Parks And Community Services Department (Continued)
Senior Recreation Supervisor 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Total Parks and Community Svcs Department 21.00 18.00 25.00 26.00 26.00 *One Recreation Coordinator transferred to PD Adopted FY 23/24 Information Technology Department
Information Technology Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Information Technology Manager 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Computer Operations & Networking Sup. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cyber Security Analyst - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst - 1.00 - - -
Network Administrator 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Office Specialist II - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Programmer Analyst II 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Senior Management Analyst - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Programmer Analyst 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Systems & Programming Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total Information Technology Department 17.00 20.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 Police Department
Police Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Police Chief - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
Animal Services Coordinator 1.00 1.00
Animal Control Officer 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Animal Control Supervisor - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Civilian Investigator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Communications Installer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Communications Officer 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 Communications Supervisor 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Community Services Specialist 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Court Liaison 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Crime Analyst 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Crime Prevention Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crime Scene Investigation Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crime Scene Specialist 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Custody Officer - - 10.00 10.00 10.00
Custody Supervisor - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Electronics Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Emergency Services Administrator 1.00 - - - -
Executive Assistant 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Emergency Services Manager * - 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50
60City of Costa Mesa, California

638
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 FY 21-22
Adopted
FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 23-24
Amended
FY 24-25
Proposed
Police Department (Continued)
Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 - - -
Office Specialist II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Park Ranger 6.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 7.00
Permit Processing Specialist - 1.00 1.00
Police Captain 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Police Lieutenant 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
Police Officer 105.00 107.00 107.00 107.00 107.00
Police Records Administrator 1.00 - - - -
Police Records Bureau Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Police Records Shift Supervisor 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Police Records and Property & Evidence Manager - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Police Sergeant 21.00 22.00 22.00 22.00 22.00
Police Training Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Property Evidence Specialist 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 Property Evidence Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Public Affairs Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Range Master 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation Coordinator* 1.00 - -
Senior Communications Officer 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Senior Communications Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Management Analyst - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Police Officer 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Senior Police Records Technician 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 Telecommunications Manager * - 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Total Police Department 216.00 221.50 238.00 241.00 242.00 * Emergency Services Manager & Telecommunications Manager shared between Police Department and Fire and Rescue Department Fire And Rescue Department
Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Fire Chief/Operations - sworn - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Fire Chief/Community Risk Reduction - non
sworn - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Fire Marshal - 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Fire Marshal 1.00 1.00 - - -
Code Enforcement Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Division Chief - Administration 1.00 1.00 - - -
Battalion Chief 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Emergency Medical Services Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Emergency Services Manager * - - 0.50 0.50 0.50
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Captain 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00
Fire Captain - Administration/Training/PIO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fire Captain - Administration/EMS - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fire Engineer 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00
Fire Protection Specialist 5.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Firefighter 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00 42.00
Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 - - -
61 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
639
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 FY 21-22
Adopted
FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 23-24
Amended
FY 24-25
Proposed
Fire And Rescue Department (Continued)
Office Specialist II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Manager Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00
Telecommunications Manager * - 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Total Fire Department 95.00 96.50 97.00 97.00 97.00 * Emergency Services Manager & Telecommunications Manager shared between Police Department and Fire and Rescue Department* Development Services Department
Economic & Development Services Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Development Services Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Planner 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Associate Planner 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Building/Combination Bldg. Inspector 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Building Technician II 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00
Chief of Code Enforcement - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Chief of Inspection 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Chief Plans Examiner 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Code Enforcement Officer 9.00 9.00 7.00 8.00 7.00
Community Improvement Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Economic Development Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grant Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Specialist II - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Permit Processing Specialist 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Planning and Sustainable Development Manager - - 1.00 2.00 2.00 Plan Checker 2.00 1.00 - - -
Plan Check Engineer 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Principal Planner 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Senior Code Enforcement Officer 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Senior Combination Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Senior Planner 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00
Zoning Administrator 1.00 - - - -
Total Development Services Department 46.00 48.00 50.00 54.00 53.00 Public Works Department
Public Works Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Active Transportation Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrative Assistant 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Assistant Engineer 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Assistant City Engineer - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Associate Engineer 5.00 7.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
City Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Construction Inspector 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Contract Administrator 1.00 - - - -
Deputy Director of Public Works - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
62City of Costa Mesa, California

640
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 FY 21-22
Adopted
FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 23-24
Amended
FY 24-25
Proposed
Public Works Department (Continued)
Energy and Sustainability Service Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - Engineering Technician II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Technician III 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Equipment Mechanic I - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Equipment Mechanic II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Equipment Mechanic III 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facilities Maintenance Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lead Facilities Maintenance Technician - 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lead Maintenance Worker 6.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
Lead Equipment Mechanic 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Superintendent 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Maintenance Supervisor 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Maintenance Worker 6.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Specialist II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Principal Civil Engineer 1.00 1.00 - - -
Senior Engineer 3.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Senior Maintenance Technician 1.00 1.00 - - -
Senior Maintenance Worker 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Senior Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Storekeeper - 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Transportation Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Total Public Works Department 72.00 75.00 80.00 79.00 79.00 * Energy and Sustainability Service Manager transferred to City Manager’s Office FY 23/24 Adopted Total Full-time Employees 530.00 550.00 588.00 600.00 602.00 Part-Time Employees FTE’s (Full-Time Equivalents)
City Council 0.50 0.50 - - -
City Manager’s Office 7.88 10.95 8.32 8.32 8.32
Parks and Community Services 75.73 70.16 63.82 62.82 62.57 Information Technology Department 0.50 0.50 - - -
Police Department 20.36 18.86 16.86 15.38 14.75
Fire and Rescue Department 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Development Services Department 6.64 5.34 5.34 5.34 5.34 63 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
641
Four-Year Personnel Summary by Department
From Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Through Fiscal Year 2024-2025 FY 21-22
Adopted
FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Adopted
FY 23-24
Amended
FY 24-25
Proposed
Part-Time Employees FTE’s (Full-Time Equivalents)
(Continued)
Public Works Department 8.00 6.25 5.50 5.50 6.00
Total Part-time FTEs 121.86 114.81 102.09 99.61 99.98 Total Citywide FTEs 651.86 664.81 690.09 699.61 701.98 64City of Costa Mesa, California

642
Resolution No. 2024-XX Page 1 of 3

ATTACHMENT 6

RESOLUTION NO. 24- xx

A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA AND THE COSTA

MESA HOUSING AUTHORITY ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA AND THE COSTA MESA HOUSING AUTHORITY DO HEREBY FIND AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution adopted on January 17, 2012, declared the need for a housing authority to function in the City of Costa Mesa, established the “Costa Mesa Housing Authority” (“Housing Authority”), and declared that the members of the City Council are the Commissioners of the Housing Authority pursuant to the California Housing Authorities Law, commencing with Health & Safety Code Section 34200, et seq. (“HAL”); and WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa is a California municipal corporation and general law city (“City”); and
WHEREAS, the City and Housing Authority desire to establish an annual budget for the Housing Authority; and
WHEREAS, the establishment of a budget for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 (“FY 23-24”) has been prepared by the City Manager and Executive Director of the Housing Authority; and WHEREAS, the budgeting process establishes the plan of expenditures and the priorities of the Housing Authority and the Housing and Community Development Division of the Development Services Department of the City, in particular as to the functions, duties, and operations of the Housing Authority pursuant to the HAL and as to the affordable housing assets, functions, and duties created by dissolution of the former Costa Mesa Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Parts 1.8 and

1.85 of Division 24, of the California Health and Safety Code (“Dissolution Law”); and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa and the Costa Mesa Housing Authority as follows:

SECTION 1. The annual budget for the Housing Authority for Fiscal Year 2024- 2025, as prepared and submitted by the City Manager/Executive Director, is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 2.

To ensure appropriate service levels and to carry out the statutory obligations of the HAL and Dissolution Law, the City Manager/Executive Director is authorized to expend funds or transfer funds among operating budgets or project budgets within adopted appropriations as needed and as permitted by law.
643
Resolution No. 2024-XX Page 2 of 3

SECTION 3. The City Clerk and Housing Authority Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 2024.

John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST:

Brenda Green, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 24-xx and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 4 th day of June, 2024, by the
following roll call vote, to wit:

CITY COUNCIL:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

HOUSING AUTHORITY:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

644
Resolution No. 2024-XX Page 3 of 3

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 5th day of June, 2024.

Brenda Green, City Clerk

645
Housing Authority

HOUSING

AUTHORITY
ATTACHMENT 7
646
317 City of Costa Mesa, California
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
647
On January 17, 2012, the City Counc il estab lished the Costa Mesa Housi ng Author ity in acc ordance with Calif ornia Housing Authorities Law, Heal th, and Safety Code Sect ion 3420 0, et seq . Also on th at date by re solution, the City Council selected the Housi ng Author ity to  ser ve as  the housi ng succe ssor and to  ass ume the housi ng asset s, duties, functions and oblig ations of the forme r Costa Mesa Redev elopment Agenc y (Form er Agenc y) as of Febru ary 1, 2012. These acti ons occu rred due to th e mand atory dissolu tion of al l Cali fornia rede velopment agen cies unde r the requirements of Div ision 24, Parts 1.8 and 1.85 of  the Calif ornia Healt h and Safet y Code (Diss olution Law). The Dissolution Law sets forth the proce sses and oblig ations of all succe ssor agenc ies. These entit ies are separ ate from the city (or  co unty) that forme d the forme r agenc y and charg ed with windi ng down the affai rs of  for mer redevelopment agencies. Further, the Dissolution Law sets forth the functions, obligations and requirements of housing successors.

Section 34176.1 of the Calif ornia Healt h and Safet y Code estab lishes certa in limit ations on exp enditures by hou sing successors. Thus , each fisca l year the Housin g Auth ority’s fund ing is li mited in tw o cate gories: (1) admin istrative costs, and (2) homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing.

The Behavioral Health Bridge Housing (BHBH) Program was created by Assembly Bill 179 (AB179), which allocated $1.5 billion to the Depar tment of Healt h Care Servi ces (DHCS ) for alloc ation to count ies to suppo rt plann ing, implementation, and infrastructure costs for the CARE Act.

Covenant Monitoring and Administration - 11500
Rental Rehabilitation — 20425
Offers deferred loans to own er of mul ti-family prope rties to mak e impro vements and repai r code viola tions. Loans were originated in the 90s and deferred unless the owner sells transfers or defaults on the property.

Housing Authority Administration — 20600
Provides administration suppo rt such as con ducting requi red board meeti ngs, maint aining financ ial recor ds and preparing annual reports, etc.

Costa Mesa Family Village — 20620
Costa Mesa Famil y Villa ge is a three -parcel, 72-un it multi -family renta l proje ct, to whi ch the Housi ng Author ity holds the groun d lease . The 55-ye ar groun d lease expir es in  yea r 2038. Annua l lease payme nt is  the great er of 8 percent of gross receipts or $108,000.

First Time Homebuyer Program — 20625
Offers deferred loans to firs t time homeb uyers for home purch ase in the City. Loans were exten ded prior to yea r 2009 under various terms.

Habitat For Humanity — 20630
The Housing Autho rity holds inter est to th e land used for the devel opment of five singl e-family homes by Ha bitat for Humanity in yea r 2004. The Housi ng Author ity maint ains enfor ceable coven ants on the prope rties. No loa n repayment is required unless the owner defaults.

Single Family Rehabilitation Program — 20640
Offers deferred loans to  hom eowners to  mak e home impro vements and fix code viola tions. The loans were extended in year 2009 and deferred until the property is sold or refinanced.

St. John Manor — 20650
St. Johns Manor is a 36-un it senio r renta l proje ct. The Housi ng Author ity’s loan to thi s proje ct was paid off in fisc al year 2018-19.
318City of Costa Mesa, California
housIng
authorIty
648
Costa Mesa Village — 20655
Costa Mesa Villa ge is a 96-un it singl e room occup ancy (SRO) proje ct joint ly funde d by the Costa Mesa Housi ng Authority, Orang e Count y Housi ng Author ity and the devel oper. The Housi ng Author ity’s loan to thi s proje ct was paid off in fiscal year 2014-15.

Housing Development And Preservation Of Affordable Housing - 11500 James/West 18th Street Property — 20635
The James/West 18th Prope rty is fou r affor dable housi ng proje cts with 30 ren tal units , owned and opera ted by the Housing Authority. The Authority acquired the projects through a foreclosure process in fiscal year 2015-16.

Homeless Outreach And Bridge Shelter Operation - 14300
Homeless Outreach — 20605
Homeless Outreach’s primary activities are community outreach and working with various organizations and governmental agenc ies to ide ntify housi ng solut ions for Costa Mesas homel ess popul ation. The Gener al Fund will provide fundi ng for progr am expen ses in  exc ess of  the Low and Moder ate Incom e Housi ng Asset Funds (LMIHAFs) $250,000 allowance for this category.

Bridge Shelter Operation — 20606
Another new compo nent to the Housi ng Author ity is the opera tion of the City’ s perma nent bridg e shelt er progr am, which is  located at  317 5  Airway Avenu e. This progr am provi des trans itional housi ng and suppo rt servi ces for up to 72 homeless adult s. Begin ning in fisc al year 2023- 24, the citie s of Cos ta Mesa and Newpor t Beach enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to allocate 20 of the 72 shelter beds to Newport Beach’s use.

Behavioral Health Bridge Housing Program- 20670
The primary focus of the BHBH Program is to assist individuals experiencing homelessness who have serious behavioral health conditions that prevent them from accessing resources and securing permanent housing. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) and the City of Costa Mesa was entered to establish BHBH services.

Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
319 City of Costa Mesa, California 649
Budget Narrative
The Fiscal Year 2024-2 5 budge t for the Housi ng Author ity is appro ximately $4.6 milli on, an incre ase of $600, 000, or 15 percent, compared to the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24. With the expansion of permanent homeless shelter facility, the City continues to grow its partnerships with the City of Newport Beach, and homeless services contractor Mercy House and Brack en’s Kitch en, to incre ase the numbe r of beds and meals to bette r serve the people experiencing homelessness year round.

FY 21-22
Actuals
FY 22-23
Adopted
Budget
FY 23-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 24-25
Proposed
Budget

REVENUES BY FUNDING SOURCE
Beahavirol Health Services $ 972,051
Costa Mesa Family Village Ground Lease $ 131,989 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 150,000 James Street 273,391 264,000 250,000 $ 250,000 Investment Income 102,263 38,000 23,400 31,550 Loan Repayments 5,111 7,000 6,000 200,000
RDA Loan Repayment from DOF (Annual ROPS) 258,209 258,209 381,141 - State SB 2 Grant 528,581 821,579 324,000
General Fund Contribution 2,438,345 1,713,827 1,264,993 1,264,993 Other Governmental Agencies 1,000,000 1,326,000 Donations 5,290 -
CDBG CV Funds 668,000 -
Use of Fund Balance 68,116 301,364 1,549,646 Transfers in from ARPA 231,839 222,469
Total Housing Authority Revenues $ 3,214,598 $ 3,665,733 $ 4,400,316 $ 6,290,709 FY 21-22
Actuals
FY 22-23
Adopted
Budget
FY 23-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 24-25
Proposed
Budget

EXPENSE CATEGORY BY PROGRAM
COVENANT MONITORING AND ADMINISTRATION - 11500

Rental Rehabilitation - 20450
Maintenance and Operations
$ 366 $ - $ - $ -
Rental Rehabilitation $ 366 $ - $ - $ -

Housing Authority Administration - 20600
Salaries and Benefi ts $ 63,383 $ 67,6 45 $ 75,060 $ 106,347 Maintenance and Operations 16,910 14,862 60,000 60,000 Subtotal Housing Authority Administration $ 80,293 $ 82,507 $ 135,060 $ 166,347

Costa Mesa Family Village - 20620
Maintenance and Operations $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Subtotal Costa Mesa Family Village $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000

First Time Homebuyer Program - 20625
Maintenance and Operations $ 151 $ - $ 11,000 $ 11,000 Subtotal First Time Homebuyer Program $ 151 $ - $ 11,000 $ 11,000

320City of Costa Mesa, California
housIng
authorIty
650
FY 21-22
Actuals
FY 2
2-23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2 3-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2 4-25
Proposed
Budget
Habitat for Humanity - 20630
Maintenance and Operations $ 640 $ 645 $ 7 ,000 $ 7 ,000 Fixed Assets 42,379 46,231 - -
Subtotal Habitat for Humanity $ 43,019 $ 46,876 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 CO
VENANT MONITORING AND ADMINISTRATION - 11500 (Continued) Single Family Rehabilitation Program - 20640
Maintenance and Operations $ - $ 1,333 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Subtotal Single Family Rehabilitation Prog. $ - $ 1,333 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 St. John Manor - 20650
Maintenance and Operations $ 7,793 $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Subtotal St. John Manor $ 7,793 $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Costa Mesa Village - 20655
Maintenance and Operations $ 6,658 $ - $ 3,100 $ 3,100 Subtotal Costa Mesa Village $ 6,658 $ - $ 3,100 $ 3,100 Subtotal Covenant Monitoring and Admin. $ 137,913 $ 130,716 $ 186,160 $ 217,447 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING - 11500 James/West 18th Street Property - 20635
Salaries and Benefit s $ 35,719 $ 34,727 $ 32,654 $ 62,930 Maintenance and Operations 149,289 164,440 202,500 342,500 Fixed Assets - - 27,600 27,600
Subtotal James/West 18th Street Property $ 185,007 $ 199,167 $ 262,754 $ 433,030 HOMELESS OUTREACH AND BRIDGE SHELTER OPERATION - 11310|11500|14300|11100 CDBG-CV - 20435
Salaries and Benefit s $ 15,703 $ 7,529 $ - $ -
Maintenance and Operations $ 746,195 $ 497, 324 $ - $ - Subtotal Homeless Outreach $ 761,899 $ 504,852 $ - $ - Tenant Based Rental Assistance - 20448
Salaries and Benefit s $ - $ - $ - $ 292,978
Subtotal Homeless Outreach $ - $ - $ - $ 292,978
Homeless Outreach - 20605 *
Salaries and Benefit s $ 810,764 $ 866,756 $ 1,039,901 $ 1,588,407 Maintenance and Operations 36,530 50,036 108,243 108,243 Fixed Assets - 300 - -
Subtotal Homeless Outreach $ 847,294 $ 917,093 $ 1,148,144 $ 1,696,650 Bridge Shelter Operation - 20606 9,194,111
Proposed Budget for
Fiscal Year 2024-2025
321 City of Costa Mesa, California 651
FY 21-22
Actuals
FY 2
2-23
Adopted
Budget
FY 2 3-24
Adopted
Budget
FY 2 4-25
Proposed
Budget
Maintenance and Operations $ 2,031,270 $ 2,064,021 $ 2,420,267 $ 2,678,553 Subtotal Bridget Shelter Operation $ 2,031,270 $ 2,064,021 $ 2,420,267 $ 2,678,553 Behavioral Health Services - 20670 972,051
Salaries and Benefit s $ - $ - $ - $ 284,050
Maintenance and Operations $ - $ - $ - $ 688,001
Subtotal Behavioral Health Services $ - $ - $ - $ 972,051

TOTAL HOUSING AUTHORITY
Salaries and Benefit s $ 925,569 $ 976,657 $ 1,147,615 $ 2,334,712 Maintenance and Operations 2,995,801 2,792,661 2,842,110 3,928,397 Fixed Assets 42,379 46,531 27,600 27,600
Total Housing Authority $ 3,963,748 $ 3,815,849 $ 4,017,325 $ 6,290,709 322City of Costa Mesa, California
housIng
authorIty
652

CITY OF COSTA MESA

RATE DETERMINATION
Effective July 1, 2024
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 2.13, the following is a list of frequently requested hourly rates 3 Other City Positions
Straight
Time 1
Special
Event
Overtime
Rate 2
Fire/Police Positions
Straight
Time 1
Special
Event
Overtime
Rate 2
Animal Control Officer $51 $62 Battalion Chief $141 $202 Assistant Engineer $63 $78 Fire Captain $105 $151
Associate Engineer $79 $97 Fire Engineer $91 $130
Associate Planner $68 $98 Firefighter $79 $113
Chief Plans Examiner $90 $110 Firefighter - Paramedic $87 $125 Code Enforcement Officer II $49 $61 Police Aide $60 $67 Communications Officer $56 $69 Police Lieutenant $135 $193 Communications Supervisor $65 $80 Police Officer $84 $120 Community Services Specialist $42 $52 Police Officer (Motorcycle) $88 $125 Construction Inspector $54 $66 Police Officer (K9) $92 $132 Crime Prevention Specialist $50 $61 Police Recruit $74 $83 Crime Scene Investigator $51 $63 Police Reserve Officer $94 $105 Equipment Mechanic II $45 $55 Police Sergeant $103 $147 Equipment Mechanic III $48 $59 Police Sergeant (Motorcycle) $107 $153 Facilities Maintenance Technician $43 $53 Police Support Services Reserve $40 $44 Lead Equipment Mechanic $54 $67 Senior Police Officer $88 $126 Lead Maintenance Worker $51 $63 Senior Police Officer (Motorcycle) $92 $132 Maintenance Services Manager $81 $100
Maintenance Supervisor $60 $74 Community Risk Reduction Team Straight OT Maintenance Worker (Maint Assistant/Worker) $39 $47 Assistant Fire Chief - Non Sworn/Fire Marshal $103 $127 Office Specialist I $34 $42 Assistant Fire Marshal $75 $92 Office Specialist II $36 $45 Code Enforcement Officer I $49 $61 Park Ranger $47 $57 Fire Protection Specialist $59 $73
Plan Check Engineer $82 $101
Principal Planner $94 $135 Other Positions
Property and Evidence Specialist $48 $59 Custody Officer $55 $67 Senior Maintenance Worker $42 $52 Police Records Technician $37 $46 Senior Combination Building Inspector $70 $101 Senior Police Records Technician $40 $49 Notes - Rates are based on most recent applicable Memorandum of Understanding. 1 Includes annual salary at top step, other compensation and benefits (excluding Unfunded Actuarial Liability and Cafeteria), divided by 2,080 hours/annually. 2 Includes straight time hourly rate plus 1/2 of the basic hourly rate divided by 2,080 hours. Other benefits are excluded from this portion of the calculations.
3 These rates do not include equipment and apparatus charges. Equipment and apparatus rates to be utilized are based on CalOES CalOES established rates. The most recent rates may be found at https://www.caloes.ca.gov/office-of-the-director/operations/response-operations/fire-rescue/administration-reimbursement/.

ATTACHMENT 8
653

ATTACHMENT 9

RESOLUTION NO. 24-xx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING AND ADOPTING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, IN ACCORDANCE WITH

ARTICLE XIII -B OF THE CONS TITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS AM ENDED BY PROPOSITION 111 AND SENATE BILL 88.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, Article XIII-B was added to the Constitution of the State of California at a general election held on November 6, 1979; and
WHEREAS, Article XIII-B was subsequently modified by Proposition 111 and Senate Bill 88 (Chapter 60/90) at a general election held on June 5, 1990; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 7910 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California, an annual appropriations limit must be established for the City effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City has chosen to use the California per capita income percentage change of

3.62% and the County ’s population growth rate of 0.31% as the factors to be used in calculating its appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2024-25; and
WHEREAS, these factors are applied to the City’s adopted appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 in determining the City’s appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2024-25; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

The appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2024-25 is established at $310,115,684.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 2024.

________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________ ___________________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly H. Barlow, City Attorney

654

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No.24-xx and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 4th day of June, 2024, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 5th day of June, 2024.

__________________________________

BRENDA GREEN, CITY CLERK

655
Costa Mesa
Police Department
Annual AB 481 Report
FY 2023/2024
______________________________________________________________________ On August 2, 2022, military equipment, as defined under Government Code 7070 , was approved for police use by the Costa Mesa City Council, consistent with Assembly Bill (AB) 481. The policy regarding use of such equipment is documented under Costa Mesa Police Department (CMPD) Policy Manual section 706 and is publicly available on the Costa Mesa Police Department website . Types, quantities, descriptions, and costs of equipment are contained in section 706.5 of the Policy Manual. As of this report, the items, uses, their quantities, their costs, and their purposes have not changed. The Department does not currently to acquire equipment beyond what is already authorized in Policy 706.

From May 6, 2023 to April 17, 2024, the CMPD has received zero (0) complaints about any of the items outlined in Policy Section 706.5. During the same period, there were zero (0) internal audits and zero (0) violations of the AB 481 Equipment Use Policy.

The CMPD recognizes critical incidents can be unpredictable and rapidly evolving. The equipment listed in the AB 481 Equipment Use Policy greatly assists law enforcement in bringing those incidents to a safe and swift resolution. The use of AB 481 equipment is continuously evaluated by department personnel to ensure compliance with State law and Department policy/procedure.

The following section outlines the AB 481 equipment used by members of the CMPD from May 6 , 202 3, to April 17 , 202 4. Certain items of AB 481 equipment, particularly consumables (ammunition, diversionary devices, pepper balls, chemical agents, etc.) are used throughout the year on a regular basis for training and maintaining operational proficiency. Training usage is n ot captured in this section. This section only provides data for the operational use of AB 481 equipment listed within this annual AB 481 Us e Summary Report.

The CMPD utilizes or displays certain pieces of AB 481 equipment during outreach and community engagement events as a means of raising awareness, transparency, and education. Such events include but are not limited to, the CMPD Citizens Academy, National Night Out, the Lion’s Club Fish Fry, and Imaginology events. The usage of the equipment in these events is not reflected in this report.

Other items listed in the CMPD Policy Manual section 706.5 that are not specifically mentioned in the summary above were not used during the time frame of this report.

Specifics regarding the purpose of each item, the associated costs and the quantity possessed is outlined under CMPD Policy Manual Section 706 and 706.5 (Attached).

ATTACHMENT 10
656
The following is data for AB 481 use by category:

VEHICLES
Mobile Command Vehicle (MCV)
The MCV was used a total of six (6) times from May 6, 2023, to April 17, 2024, during official law enforcement activities in accordance with CMPD policy.

Authorized Usages:

Only officers trained in the use and deployment of the MCV shall drive the vehicle under the direction of the Chief of Police, Field Operations Captain, Support Services Captain, SWAT Commander, Watch Commander, or their designee. Situations where the MCV may be deployed include but are not limited to:
• Critical incidents
• Natural disasters
• Special events
• Training
• Emergencies
Armored Rescue Vehicles (ARVs)
The CMPD ARV was not used from May 6, 2023, to April 17,2024

Authorized Use:

The ARVs use shall be authorized by the Chief of Police, Division Commander, Watch Commander , or SWAT Commander based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident. ARVs shall only be used by personnel trained in their deployment and in a manner consistent with Department policies/procedures. Situations, where the ARVs may be deployed, include but are not limited to:
• Critical incidents
• Natural disasters
• Special events
• Training
• Emergencies

657

SPECIALIZED TACTICAL EQUIPMENT
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
UASs were utilized at total of 69 times from May 6, 2023, to April 17, 2024, during official law enforcement activities in accordance with CMPD policy.

Authorized usages:

Only assigned operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate any UAS during approved missions. The UAS is to be deployed when its capabilities would assist officers or incident commanders with the following situations, which include but are not limited to:
• Major collision investigations
• Search for missing persons
• Natural disaster management
• Crime scene photography
• SWAT, tactical, or other public safety and life preservation missions.
• In response to specific requests from local, State, or Federal fire authorities for fire response and/or prevention.

Tactical Robot
The Tactical Robot was not used from May 6, 2023, to April 17, 2024.

Authorized usages:

The tactical robot shall only be deployed by Department personnel trained in its use, and with the approval of the SWAT Commander, Watch Commander, or their designee. Situations, where the robots may be deployed, include but are not limited to:
• Critical incidents
• Natural disasters
• Special events
658

LESS- LETHAL DEVICES
40mm Launchers and Munitions
40mm launchers and munitions were not used from May 6, 2023, to April 17, 2024.

Authorized usages:

Situations where the deployment of less-lethal impact or chemical munitions are authorized include but are not limited to:
• Self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals. • Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents where the criminal behavior involved exceeds a failure to disburse or curfew violation.
• Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. • Vicious animals
• Training exercises or approved demonstrations
• Tactical situations involving the deployment of the
Department's SWAT Team including but not limited to,
barricaded subjects.

PepperBall Launcher and Munitions
PepperBall launcher and munitions were not used from May 6, 2023, to April 17, 2024.

Authorized usages:

Only officers who have received certification in the use of PepperBall are authorized to use PepperBall. Situations where the Pepperball may be deployed include, but are not limited to:
• Tactical situations involving the deployment of the
Department's SWAT Team
• Training exercises or approved demonstrations
• Potentially vicious animals
• Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained • Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents
• Self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals Chemical and Smoke Canisters
Chemical and smoke canisters were not used from May 6, 2023, to April 17, 2024.

Authorized usages:
659

Only SWAT officers who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents. Situations where the chemical agents may be deployed include, but are not limited to:
• Self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals • Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents
• Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. • Potentially vicious animals
• Training exercises or approved demonstrations
• Tactical situations involving the deployment of the
Department's SWAT Team.

FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION
Rifles and Ammunition
Rifles and associated ammunition were deployed, but never fired, various times during official law enforcement activities in accordance with CMPD policy.

Authorized usages:

Only officers POST certified in the use of the rifle are authorized to deploy them in the field. Situations where rifles may be used include, to prevent serious bodily injury or death to self or others and during training:

660
Resolution No. 24-XX Page 1 of 3
ATTACHMENT 11
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA,

RENEWING ITS MILITARY EQUIPMENT POLICY

RECITALS
A. On September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481 (“AB 481”), adding Chapter 12.8, “Funding, Acquisition and Use of Military Equipment”, to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code (sections 7070 – 7075), relating to the use of military equipment by California law enforcement agencies; and B. AB 481 seeks to provide transparency, oversight, and an opportunity for meaningful public input on decisions regarding whether and how military equipment is funded, acquired, or used; and
C. AB 481 requires, inter alia, the Police Department submit to the City Council an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the City Council; and
D. The City Council shall review its Ordinance approving the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment at least annually and vote on whether to renew the Ordinance at a regular meeting; and
E. The City Council shall determine, based on the annual military equipment report submitted, whether each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth in its Ordinance; and F. The City Council has reviewed the annual military report submitted by the Police Department and determined the military equipment has complied with the standards for approval set forth in its Ordinance; and
G. The City Council previously renewed Ordinance No. 2022-03 by resolution of the City Council set forth below.

H. The City Council desires to again renew Ordinance No. 2022-03.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantial part of this resolution.

SECTION 2. City of Costa Mesa Ordinance No. 2022-03 is hereby renewed.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to passage and adoption thereof. 661
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 2024.

________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST:

________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

662
ATTACHMENT 1
663
664
665
666
Costa Mesa
Police Department
Costa Mesa PD Policy Manual
706.5 AB 481 EQUIPMENT INVENTORY

VEHICLES
(A) Mobile Command Vehicle (MCV): A vehicle used during critical incidents as a field- based command post, providing Incident Commanders with access to Department computer systems and dispatch center.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities : 2021 Freightliner MT -55 chassis (custom built) vehicle, approximate cost: $1.2 Million, quantity: not to exceed 1. The MCV can also be utilized for SWAT/CNT and other critical incidents, significant, preplanned events, searching for missing persons, natural disasters, and community events. The MCV has redundant and supplemental communications capabilities increasing public safety interoperability during complex incidents or those requiring supplemental communications capabilities for coordination.

2. Purpose: Used for critical incidents based on the circumstances of a specific event, large event, or natural disaster to effectively and efficiently serve the community.

3. Authorized Use: Only officers trained in the use and deployment of the MCV shall drive the vehicle under the direction of the Chief of Police, Field Operations Captain, Support Services Captain, SWAT Commander, Watch Commander, or their designee. Situations where the MCV may be deployed include but are not limited to critical incidents, natural disasters, special events, training, and emergencies.

4. Lifespan: The MCV has an estimated lifespan of approximately 20-years; however, upgrades are required annually to maintain communications and IT systems.

5. Fiscal Impact: The MCV was authorized in 2021 and purchased in 2022.

Annual maintenance costs are estimated to be approximately: $6,000.

Annual communication licensing, subscriptions, and required upgrades are estimated to be approximately: $6,000

6. Training: Drivers/Operators shall receive safe handling and maneuvering training on a closed training course. Once the operator has shown competence in vehicle handling, the driver/operator will drive the vehicle with an experienced driver throughout the city.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: It is the policy of the Department to use the MCV in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy. (B) Armored Rescue Vehicles (ARVs): Commercially-produced, ballistic protected, wheeled vehicles designed for law enforcement purposes.

Policy
706
ATTACHMENT 13
667

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) Lenco BearCat, cost approximately: $318, 000, quantity: not to exceed

1. The Lenco BearCat is an armored rescue vehicle that provides its occupants with ballistic protection beyond ballistic shields or personal body armor. It offers greater safety to community members and officers during high-risk incidents. It is capable of seating a driver and approximately 7 passengers.

2. Purpose: Used in response to critical incidents to enhance officers and community safety, improve scene containment and stabilization, and assist in resolving critical incidents. Additionally, ARVs may be deployed as displays for community outreach events.

3. Authorized Use: ARV use shall be authorized by the Chief of Police, Division Commander, Watch Commander or SWAT Commander based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident. ARVs shall only be used by personnel trained in their deployment and in a manner consis tent with Department policies/procedures. Situations where the ARVs may be deployed include but are not limited to critical incidents, natural disasters, special events, training, and emergencies.

4. Lifespan: The ARV has an estimated lifespan of approximately 20 years.

5. Fiscal Impact:
(a) Lenco BearCat: Annual maintenance cost approximately: $4,000

6. Training: All drivers/operators shall attend formalized instruction in vehicle operations, practical driving instruction, and deployment procedures.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules : It is the policy of the department to use the ARV in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy.

SPECIALIZED TACTICAL EQUIPMENT
(A) Tactical Robot: A remotely controlled, tracked, robot equipped with cameras and two-way audio communication capabilities.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities: IROBOT FASTPAC PACKBOT TACTICAL ROBOT, cost: on loan from US military, quantity: not to exceed 2. A remotely operated tactical robot providing officers with the ability to observe the interior of a structure without entering. This capability increases the safety of community members, officers, and suspects by providing the operator with the ability to observe and locate subjects without the risk of a face-to-face confrontation. Additionally, the remote, two- way, communication capability allows operators to de- escalate situations by negotiating the surrender of barricaded subjects.

2. Purpose: To be used during tactical incidents to safely search a structure without exposing officers and/or community members to the risk of a face-to- face confrontation.

3. Authorized Use: The tactical robot shall only be deployed by Department personnel trained in its use, and with the approval of the SWAT Commander, 668
Watch Commander, or their designee. Situations where the robots may be deployed include but are not limited to critical incidents, natural disasters, special events, training, and emergencies.

4. Lifespan: The robot's lifespan is approximately 10 years.

5. Fiscal Impact: The iRobot FASTPAC Packbot was loaned to the Department in 2021. The Department paid approximately $500 in shipping costs. Annual maintenance cost of approximately: $200.

6. Training: All operators shall receive initial training before deploying the robot in the field.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department shall only use the robot pursuant to State and Federal Law and department policy. (B) Unmanned Aerial System (UAS): An unmanned aircraft and the associated equipment necessary to control it remotely.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) DJI Mini 2-6, approximate cost: $909 each, quantity: not to exceed 15.

Utilizing DJI's OcuSync 2.0 2.4/5.8 GHz wireless transmission technology, the Mini 2 can be operated from up to 6.2 miles distance from the operator while still providing video of what the drone records. The Mini 2 can also be flown as high as 2.5 miles and withstand 19 to 24 mph winds. The DJI Mini 3 is an upgrade from the DJI Mini 2. It features a Tri-Directional Obstacle Sensing (Forward/Backward/Downward), Record Up to 4K/60fps Vide o and 4K/30fps HDR Video, 34-min Max Flight Time, True Vertical Shooting, FocusTrack (ActiveTrack, Spotlight, and Point of Interest). This UAS is able to fly indoors unlike other UAS systems.
(b) Autel EVO II 640T, approximate cost: $ 5,400, quantity: not to exceed

4. The EVO II 640T features a high -resolution thermal camera, which enables the ability to capture incredible detail in dark environments, not previously possible on an aerial drone of this size. Thermal vision capabilities can be combined with the 8K/49MP visual camera for visual intelligence. 12 visual sensors provide omnidirectional obstacle avoidance.
(c) Autel EVO II Pro, approximate cost: $ 3,300 each, quantity: not to exceed 5. The EVO II Pro features a high resolution camera with the ability to capture incredible video and photo details. Twelve visual sensors provide omnidirectional obstacle avoidance.
(d) LOKI MK2, approximate cost: $6,500, quantity: not to exceed 3. LOKI is the world's first purpose-built tactical UAS. Designed and built in conjunction with several of the world's top counter-terror units, LOKI Mk2 solves virtually all of the problems associated with the tactical use of commercial UAS systems. LOKI is intended for close-quarter, indoor, and outdoor tactical scouting missions, and features a highly sensitive Night-Day + IR sensor camera giving it the ability to fly and see in complete darkness.
669
(e) DJI Mavic 3T, approximate cost: $3,889 quantity: not to exceed 4. The DJI Mavic 3T features a high-resolution thermal camera, which enables the ability to capture incredible detail in dark environments, not previously possible on an aerial drone of this size. Thermal vision capabilities can be combined with the 4K/60MP visual camera for visual intelligence. 12 visual sensors provide omnidirectional obstacle avoidance and dual tele cameras.
(f) DJI Avata Pro, approximate cost: $1,428, quantity: not to exceed 2. DJI Avata Pro Immersive Flight Experience, Intuitive Motion Control, 4K/60fps 155° Super-Wide FOV Videos, Powerful Video Stabilization, Enhanced Safety with Built -in Propeller Guard, 1080p/100fps video transmission quality: the lowest latency of 30 ms, Dual 1080p Micro -OLED Screens. Great for interior flying for high-risk situations. (g) DJI Matrice 300 RTK, approximate cost $20,000, quantity: not to exceed 2. DJI Matrice 300 RTK, would be used for Drone as a Frist Responder (DFR). DJI Matrice has a flight time of 55 minutes, 6 - directional sensing and positing, night -vison FPV camera, max horizontal speed 51 MPH, Forward/Backward/Downward FOV, operating frequency 2.4/5.8GHz, 12-mile radius. Great for day-to-day operation and able to fly in harsh environments.
(h) Skydio X10, approximate cost $30,000, quantity: not to exceed

2. Skydio X10, would be used for Drone as a Frist Responder (DFR). Skydio X10 has a flight time of 40 minutes, max horizontal speed 45 MPH, Forward/Backward/Downward FOV, 7.5 mile radius, integrated with FLOCK safety cameras and AXON, controlled by remote or browser, and onboard AI capability. Great for day to day operation and able to fly in harsh environments.
(i)

2. Purpose: To be deployed when its capabilities would assist officers or incident commanders with the following situations, which include but are not limited to:
(a) Major collision investigations.
(b) Search for missing persons.
(c) Natural disaster management.
(d) Crime scene photography.
(e) SWAT, tactical, or other public safety and life preservation missions. (f) In response to specific requests from local, State, or Federal fire authorities for fire response and/or prevention.

3. Authorized Use: Only assigned operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate any UAS during approved missions.

Situations where UASs may be deployed include but are not limited to critical incidents, natural disasters, special events, training, and emergencies.

4. Lifespan: All UAS equipment has an estimated lifespan of approximately 3-5 years.
670

5. Fiscal Impact: The Department is in the process of identifying a funding source for the UAS program, including an application for grant funding. The estimated annual cost of the UAS program maintenance is approximately $10,000.

6. Training: All Department UAS operators will be licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration for UAS operation. In addition, each operator must attend ongoing monthly training.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department will only deploy the UAS for official law enforcement purposes, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to State and Federal law and department policy. (C) NIGHT VISION (NVGs): Optical device to increase an officer’s ability to see at night or in low-light conditions.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities: MUM-14XR-5 night vision monocular, cost: on loan from US military, quantity : not to exceed 40. The MUM-14XR-5 is a high performance modular, hand-held passive night vision monocular device that utilizes a single Generation III intensifier tube to provide crisp, clear images under th e darkest conditions. The m onocular "single tube / single eyepiece" approach to night vision missions is based upon the proven concept that independent use of each eye maximizes the ability of the user to operate under a wide range of low light conditions and maintain maximum situational awareness.

2. Purpose: To be deployed when its view would assist officers or incident commanders with the following situations, which include but are not limited to:
(a) Search for missing persons.
(b) Natural disaster management.
(c) SWAT, tactical, or other public safety and life preservation missions.

3. Authorized Use: NVGs shall only be used by trained members of the Department's SWAT Team during situations that include but are not limited to the following:
(a) By officers who have been trained in their proper use (b) In hostage and barricaded subject situations
(c) In high -risk warrant (search/arrest) services where there may be extreme hazards to officers
(d) During other high-risk situations where their use would enhance officer safety and the safety of community members
(e) During training exercises

4. Lifespan: Is approximately 10 years

5. Fiscal Impact: Loaned from US military. No annual maintenance costs.

6. Training: All Department members who have been issued NVG’s will train 671
with them on an annual basis.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department will only utilize NVGs for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal law and department policy.
(D) Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD): The LRAD is a high -intensity directional acoustical array for long-range, crystal clear hailing, notification, and an unmistakable warning tone. The LRAD is primarily used as a communication device.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities: LRAD 100x, approximate cost: $10,703.56, quantity: not to exceed 1. Self-contained, portable, and featuring an extended voice broadcast range out to 600 meters, the LRAD 100X ensures voice messages are clearly heard and understood. LRAD's optimized driver, waveguide, and power efficiency technologies enable the LRAD 100X to provide several hours of clear, continuous communication from a single battery charge.

2. Purpose: To be used to issue dispersal orders during crowd and riot control situations or to address the public in the event of civil emergencies, natural disasters, evacuations, and police incidents (e.g., missing persons, perimeters for wanted suspects/K9 deployments, etc.). The LRAD may also be used to issue a warning tone.

3. Authorized Use: LRADs shall only be used by personnel trained in its deployment and used in a manner consistent with State and Federal law and training.

4. Lifespan: LRADs have an estimated lifespan of approximately 25 years.

5. Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance cost of approximately $300.

6. Training: All operators receive training before operating any LRADs in the field.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department shall only utilize the LRAD for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal law and department policy.

LESS-LETHAL DEVICES
(A) 40MM Launchers and Munitions: 40MM launchers are utilized by Department personnel as a less-lethal tool to deploy less-lethal impact munitions and chemical agents.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY Single Shot 40MM Launcher, #1300, approximate cost: $1,000, quantity: not to exceed 100. The 40MM Single Launcher is a tactical single-shot launcher that has an Integrated Front Grip (IFG), equipped with an EOTech holographic sight system It will fire standard 40mm less-lethal ammunition, up to 4.8 inches in cartridge length. It will launch a 40MM less-lethal round up to 131 feet. (b) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY Tactical 4 -Shot 40MM Launcher, #1440. 672
Cost approximately $1,800. Quantity: not to exceed 6. Designed for riot and tactical situations, the Defense Technology 1440 40mm Tactical 4- Shot Launcher is low -profile and lightweight, providing multi -shot capability in an easy to carry launcher. It features the Rogers Super Stoc expandable gun stock, an adjustable Picatinny mounted front grip, and a unique direct-drive system to advance the magazine cylinder. It is equipped with a EOTech holographic sight system.
(c) B&T GL06 BT -31000-A Single Shot 40MM Launcher approximate cost:
$1,400 each, quantity: not to exceed 4. Designed from the ground up for lightweight, accurate, and rapid deployment, the B&T GL06 launcher and SIR (Safe Impact Round) ammunition family is the state of the art in a point-of-aim/point-of-impact “less lethal” system created specifically for public order, law enforcement and peacekeeping operations. Rifled Barrel for Precision Accuracy, Folding Stock, Familiar Ergonomic Controls, Multiple Picatinny Accessory Rails. Color: Black, material:

Polymer / Aluminum. Caliber: 40mm, Barrel Length: 11", Twist Rate:
1:47, Length: 15.2-23.5 ", Weight 4.6 Lbs, Action: Single Shot. (d) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM EXACT IMPACT SPONGE, #6325, cost approximately: $20, quantity: not to exceed 500. A less lethal 40mm lightweight plastic and foam projectile fired from a single or multi- round purpose-built 40mm launcher with a rifled barrel at 325 FPS. The 30-gram foam projectile delivers 120 ft/ lbs. of energy on impact. The 40mm Exact Impact Sponge Round provides accurate and effective performance when fired from the approved distance of not less than ten (10) feet and as far as 131 feet from the target.
(e) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT CS CRUSHABLE FOAM ROUND, #6320, cost approximately: $18, quantity: not to exceed 60. A less lethal 40MM lightweight plastic and crushable foam projectile fired from a single or multi -round purpose -built 40mm launcher with a rifled barrel at 295 FPS. The 39 -gram crushable foam projectile delivers 120 ft./lbs. of energy upon impact in addition to the dispersion of 5 grams of CS irritant. The 40mm Direct Impact CS Round provides accurate and effective performance when fired from the approved distance of not less than ten (10) feet and as far as 120 feet from the target. Only trained members of the Department's SWAT Team are authorized to deploy the 40mm Direct Impact CS round. (f) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, DIRECT IMPACT MARKING
CRUSHABLE FOAM ROUND, # 6326,cost approximately: $21,
quantity: not to exceed 50. A less lethal 40MM lightweight plastic and foam projectile with a green marking agent, fired from a single or multi- round purpose built 40MM launcher with a rifled barrel at 325 FPS. The 30-gram foam projectile delivers up to 120 ft./lbs. of energy upon impact. The 40MM Direct Impact Marking Crushable Foam Round provides accurate and effective performance when fired from the approved distance of not less than then (10) feet and as far as 131 feet from the target. Only trained members of the Department's SWAT Team are authorized to deploy the 40mm Marking Round.
673
(g) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, EXACT IMPACT LE 40MM EXTENDED
RANGE SPONGE ROUND, #6325LE , cost approximately: $25, quantity: not to exceed 50. A less lethal 40mm lightweight plastic and foam projectile fired from a single or multi -round purpose -built 40mm launcher with a rifled barrel at 400 FPS. The 40mm Exact Impact Extended Range Sponge Round provides accurate and effective performance when fired from the approved distance of not less than 33 feet, and as far as 230 feet from the target. Only trained members of the Department's SWAT Team are authorized to deploy the 40mm Extended Range Sponge Round.
(h) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM FERRET POWDER BARRICADE
ROUND, CS, #1292, cost approximately: $25, quantity: not to exceed

50. The Ferret 40 mm Barricade Penetrating Round is filled with a CS powder chemical agent. It is a frangible projectile that is spin-stabilized, utilizing fins and barrel rifling. It is non -burning and used by tactical teams to penetrate barriers and deliver a chemical agent. Only trained members of the Department's SWAT Team are authorized to deploy the 40mm Ferret Powder Barricade Round.
(i) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM FERRET LIQUID BARRICADE
ROUND, CS, #1262, cost approximately: $25, quantity: not to exceed

20. The Ferret 40 mm Barricade Penetrating Round is filled with a CS liquid chemical agent. It is a frangible projectile that is spin -stabilized, utilizing fins and barrel rifling. It is non -burning and used by tactical teams to penetrate barriers and deliver a chemical agent. Only trained members of the Department's SWAT Team are authorized to deploy the 40mm Ferret Liquid Barricade Round.
(j) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY Single Shot 40MM Launcher, #1425, cost approximately: $1,000, quantity: not to exceed 100. The 40MM Single Launcher is a tactical single-shot launcher that features an expandable Rogers Super Stoc and adjustable Integrated Front Grip (IFG), equipped with an EOTech holographic sight system. It will fire standard 40mm less-lethal ammunition, up to 4.8 inches in cartridge length. It will launch a 40MM less-lethal round up to 131 feet.

8. Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where the employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable.

9. Authorized Use: Situations where the deployment of less-lethal impact or chemical munitions are authorized include but are not limited to:
(a) Self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals (b) Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents where the criminal behavior involved exceeds a failure to disburse or curfew violation. (c) Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained (d) Vicious animals
(e) Training exercises or approved demonstrations

674
(f) Tactical situations involving the deployment of the Department's SWAT Team including, but not limited to barricaded subjects.

10. Lifespan:
(a) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY Single Shot Launcher is approximately 20 years
(b) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY Tactical 4-Shot Launcher is approximately 20 years
(c) All munitions listed above are approximately 5 years

11. Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance for the 40MM launchers is approximately $50 each.

12. Training: Personnel deploying less-lethal or chemical agents will be trained in their use and deployment before using them in the field. All training will be conducted by a POST-certified less-lethal or chemical agent instructor.

13. Legal and Procedural Rules: It is the department’s policy to use all less - lethal devices and associated munitions in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy.
(E) PepperBall Launcher and Munitions: A less-lethal device that discharges projectiles designed to breach glass or projectiles containing chemical agents

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) PepperBall FTC Launcher, cost approximately: $510 each, quantity: not to exceed 10. Semi- automatic launcher system with a firing rate of 10- 12 RPS. Compact lightweight modular design. Ambidextrous rotational safety switch. 30 cubic inch high capacity high -pressure air system.

Designed for use with high-pressure air.
(b) PepperBall INERT Powder Projectiles, cost approximately: $300 for a case of 375, quantity: not to exceed 6 cases. Inert projectiles used for training purposes.
(c) PepperBall LIVE -X PAVA / Oleoresin Capsicum (OC), cost approximately: $1,100 for a case of 375, quantity: not to exceed 4 cases. Contains a powerful concentration of PAVA pepper powder. One round of LIVE -X™ contains the equivalent to 10 regular PepperBall rounds.

2. Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for the use of PepperBall may include, but are not limited to:
(a) Tactical situations involving the deployment of the Department's SWAT Team
(b) Training exercises or approved demonstrations
(c) Potentially vicious animals
(d) Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained 675
(e) Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents
(f) Self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals

3. Authorized Use: Only officers who have received certification in the use of PepperBall are authorized to use PepperBall. Situations where the Pepperball may be deployed include but are not limited to critical incidents, emergencies, and training.

4. Lifespan:
(a) PepperBall FTC Launcher approximately 20 years
(b) All PepperBall projectiles have a lifespan of approximately 3 years.

5. Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance for the PepperBall launchers is approximately $50.

6. Training: Only officers who have been properly trained will be permitted to deploy and use Pepperball.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department will only deploy PepperBall for law enforcement purposes and in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy.
(F) Chemical Agent and Smoke Canisters: Canisters that disburse chemical agents and/or smoke when deployed.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, RIOT CONTROL CS gas, #1082, cost approximately: $41, quantity: not to exceed 100. The Riot Control CS is a continuous discharge canister. This canister can be hand thrown or launched from a fired delivery system. The canister is 6.0in. by 2.35 in. and holds an approximately 2.7 oz. of active agent payload. It has an approximate burn time of 20-40 seconds.
(b) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, FLAMELESS TRI -CHAMBER CS
CANISTER, #1032, cost approximately; $32, quantity: not to exceed

10. The Tri-Chamber Flameless CS canister design allows the contents to burn within an internal can and disperse the agent safely with reduced risk of fire. The canister is designed primarily for indoor tactical situations to detect and/or dislodge a barricaded subject. This canister will deliver approximately .70 ounces of agent during its 20-25 seconds burn time. The Tri-Chamber Flameless canister can be used in crowd control and tactical deployment situations by Law Enforcement and Corrections but was designed with the barricade situation in mind. Its applications in tactical situations are primarily to detect and/or dislodge barricaded subjects. The purpose of the Tri - Chamber Flameless canister is to minimize the risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfort, and/or incapacitation of potentially violent or dangerous subjects. The Tri-Chamber Flameless canister provides the option of delivering a pyrotechnic chemical device indoors, maximizing the chemicals' effectiveness via heat and vaporization while minimizing or negating the chance of fire to the structure.
676
(c) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, POCKET TACTICAL CANISTER, CS,
#1016, cost approximately: $23, quantity: not to exceed 100. The Pocket Tactical CS Canister is small and lightweight. The 0.9 oz. of active agent will burn approximately 20 -40 seconds. At 4.75 in. by 1.4 inches in size, it easily fits in most tactical pouches. Though this device is slightly over four inches in length, it produces a smoke cloud so fast it appears to be an enveloping screen produced by a full -size tactical canister.
(d) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, MAXIMUM SMOKE CANISTER, #1073,
cost approximately: $35, quantity: not to exceed 25. The Maximum Smoke canister is specifically designed for outdoor use in a crowd control capacity with a high volume of continuous burn that expels its payload in approximately 1.5 minutes through four gas ports located on top of the canister. This can be used to conceal tactical movement or re-route a crowd.

2. Purpose: To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for the use of the less-lethal canisters may include, but are not limited to:
(a) Self-destructive, dangerous, and/or combative individuals (b) Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents
(c) Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained (d) Potentially vicious animals
(e) Training exercises or approved demonstrations
(f) Tactical situations involving the deployment of the Department's SWAT Team

3. Authorized Use: Only SWAT officers who have received POST certification in the use of chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents.

Situations where the chemical agents may be deployed include but are not limited to critical incidents, emergencies, and training.

4. Lifespan: Approximately 5 years from manufacturing date.

5. Fiscal Impact: No annual maintenance costs

6. Training: SWAT Team members utilizing chemical agent canisters are certified by POST less lethal and chemical agents instructors.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department will only deploy chemical agents for law enforcement purposes and in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy.

SPECIALTY MUNITIONS
(A) Breaching Shotguns and Munitions: Shotguns and specialty munitions utilized to access secured structures when no other means have proven successful.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) REMINGTON 870 BREACHING SHOTGUN, cost approximately:
677
$500, quantity 2: not to exceed 2. The breaching shotgun is a standard patrol issue shotgun that is shortened to improve maneuverability in a tactical environment.
(b) DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, TKO 12-GAUGE BREACHING ROUND,
cost approximately: $7, quantity: not to exceed 100. The 12 -Gauge TKO Breaching Round is a 12-Gauge shell loaded with a compressed zinc slug, utilizing smokeless powder as a propellant. It is a widely used method to breach door locks or hinges for entry d uring tactical operations. When properly deployed, the TKO can defeat door lock mechanisms, doorknobs, hinges, deadbolts, safety chains, and padlocks on both wooden and hollow core doors. Upon impact with the target, the zinc slug disintegrates into a fine powder eliminating fragmentation.

2. Purpose: Used to defeat locking mechanisms on doors or gates when mechanical breaching is ineffective or not feasible due to environmental factors.

3. Authorized Use: Breaching shotguns and munitions shall only be utilized by trained members of the Department's SWAT Team and only with the approval of the Incident Commander, SWAT Commander, or their designee during tactical incidents or training exercises.

4. Lifespan:
(a) Remington Breaching Shotguns approximately 25 years (b) TKO 12-Gauge Breaching Round approximately 5 years

5. Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance of shotguns, approximately $100

6. Training: All SWAT Team members deploying breaching shotguns and munitions shall receive initial training before utilizing them in the field.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department will only utilize breaching shotguns and munitions for official law enforcement purposes in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy.
(B) Noise Flash Diversionary Devices (NFDD): A device used to distract or divert a person's attention.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities: DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY LOW-ROLL NON -RELOADABLE DISTRACTION DEVICE, #8902NR cost approximately: $42, quantity: not to exceed 100. A non-bursting, non- fragmenting single -bang device that produces a thunderous bang with intense bright light. Ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, room entry, or other high-risk arrest situations.

2. Purpose: A diversionary device is ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, room entry, or other high-risk arrest situations. To produce atmospheric overpressure and brilliant white light and, as a result, can cause short-term (6 - 8 seconds) physiological/psychological, sensory deprivation to give officers a tactical advantage.

3. Authorized Use: Diversionary Devices shall only be used by trained 678
members of the Department's SWAT Team during situations that include but are not limited to the following:
(a) By officers who have been trained in their proper use (b) In hostage and barricaded subject situations
(c) In high -risk warrant (search/arrest) services where there may be extreme hazards to officers
(d) During other high-risk situations where their use would enhance officer safety
(e) During training exercises

4. Lifespan: Until deployed

5. Fiscal Impact: No annual maintenance

6. Training: Prior to use, officers must attend diversionary device training conducted by Post certified instructors.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The Department will only utilize NFDDs for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal law and department policy.

FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION
(A) Rifles: Shoulder-fired firearms, with long spirally grooved barrels, intended to cause projectiles to spin, improving accuracy over a long distance.

1. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) COLT LAW ENFORCEMENT CARBINE 5.56mm (.223 Rem) PATROL RIFLE (6920) equipped with an EO -Tech Holographic sight, tactical light, and sling, cost approximately: $1,588, quantity: not to exceed 100.

Action: Gas Operated Semi-Auto, Caliber: 223 Remington/5.56 NATO, Barrel Length: 16.1", Capacity: 30+1, Trigger: Standard, Safety:

Reversible Safety Selector, Weight: 6.95 lbs, Stock: Black 4 -Position Collapsible, Metal Finish: Black, Muzzle: A2 Flash Hider, Rec eiver Material: 7075 -T6 Aluminum, Sights: A2 Front, Barrel Description:

Chrome-Lined, Twist: 1:7" Purpose: Duty \ Range, Finish: Black, Overall Length: 32” to 35” Features: Front Barrel Lug/ Ejection Port Cover, Effective Range: 400m
(b) COLT M4 CARBINE COMMANDO (R0933) / CQB (LE6946) 5.56mm (.223 Rem) SWAT RIFLE equipped with an EO-Tech holographic sight, tactical light, and sling, cost approximately: $1,300, quantity: not to exceed 30. Action: Gas Operated Full -Auto, Caliber: 223 Remington /5.56 NATO, Barrel Length: 10.3" or 11.5”, Capacity: 30+1, Trigger:

Standard, Safety: Reversible Safety Selector, Weight: 6.25 lbs, Stock:

Black 4 -Position Collapsible, Metal Finish: Black, Muzzle: A2 Flash Hider, Receiver Material: 7075 -T6 Aluminum, Sights: A2 Front, Barrel Description: Chrome-Lined, Twist: 1:7" Purpose: Duty \ Range, Finish:

Black, Overall Length: 26” to 29.5” Features: Front Barrel Lug/ Ejection 679
Port Cover, Effective Range: 400m.
(c) SIG SAUER MPX SWAT 9mm SUBMACHINE GUN equipped with EO- Tech holographic sight, tactical light, and sling. Cost approximately:
$1,800, Quantity: not to exceed 20. Action: Short Stroke Piston, Full- Auto, Caliber: 9mm NATO (9x19mm), Barrel Length: 8”, Capacity:
30+1, Trigger: Standard, Safety: Ambidextrous Safety Selector, Weight: 5.6 lbs, Stock: Folding or 5 Position telescoping, Metal Finish:

Black, Muzzle: A1 Flash Hider, Receiver Material: 7075-T6 Aluminum, Sights: folding front and rear , Barrel Twist: 1:10 " Purpose: Duty \ Range, Finish: Black, Overall Length: 26” Effective Range: 200m. (d) COLT LE6943 5.56 (.223 Rem.) TRAFFIC / PATROL RIFLE equipped with EOTech holographic sight and sling, cost approximately: $1,700, quantity: not to exceed 20. The LE6943 displays fresh ingenuity with Mil-Spec hammer and trigger pivot pins, 11.5 -inch barrel, a Magpul MBUS backup sight and a folding front sight for enhanced optical solutions, and a straight gas tube and a removable lower rail, which provides modularity for under mounting accessories. The patented one- piece monolithic upper receiver incorporates a continuous Mil-Spec rail from the rear of the upper receiver to the front sight. This feature affords unmatched repeatability for mounting optical systems, not found with separate handguard rail systems. Designed with accuracy in mind, its true free-floating barrel provides the enhanced accuracy necessary for long-range acquisition capability.
(e) DANIEL DEFENSE DD5 V3 RIFLE 7.62x51mm (.308 WIN) equipped with a telescopic or holographic sight, tactical light, and sling, cost approximately: $2,123, quantity: not to exceed 4. Action: Gas Operated Semi-Automatic, Caliber 7.62 x 51 mm, Barrel length 16”, Overall Length: 33” – 37”, Weight: 8.3 lbs, Magazine Capacity: 20 rounds, Barrel Specifications: 1:10 Twist, hammer forged and chrome lined.

2. Purpose: Used as precision weapons to address threats that exceed the capability of the Department's standard-issue handgun.

3. Authorized Use: Only members POST certified in the use of the rifle are authorized to deploy them in the field. Situations where rifles may be used include to prevent serious bodily injury or death to self or others and during training.

4. Lifespan:
(a) COLT LAW ENFORCEMENT CARBINE PATROL RIFLE
approximately: 15 years
(b) COLT M4 CARBINE COMMANDO / CQB SWAT RIFLE approximately:
10 years
(c) SIG SAUER MPX SWATSUBMACHINE GUN approximately: 10 years (d) COLT LE6943 TRAFFIC PATROL RIFLE approximately: 15 years (e) DANIEL DEFENSE DD5 V3 RIFLE approximately 10 years
680

5. Fiscal Impact: Annual maintenance for each rifle is approximately $50

6. Training: Prior to using a rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass a range qualification two times a year.

7. Legal and Procedural Rules: The department will use rifles in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy. .

8. Description, cost, quantity, and capabilities:
(a) WINCHESTER .223/5.56 55 -grain RANGER SOFT -POINT RIFLE ROUND, cost approximately: $607 per case of 1000, quantity: not to exceed 30 cases. Winchester ammunition features a lead core 55-grain non-corrosive, soft-point bullet in a reloadable brass casing. (b) WINCHESTER .223/5.56 55 -grain NATO M193 RIFLE ROUND, cost approximately: $378 per case of 1000, quantity: not to exceed 30 cases.

Winchester ammunition features a lead core 55-grain full metal jacket, non-corrosive boxer primer, in a reloadable brass casing. (c) WINCHESTER.223/5.56 FRANGIBLE TRAINING AMMUNITION, cost approximately: $285 per case of 200, quantity: not to exceed 30 cases.

Winchester Frangible .223 Remington ammunition is loaded with a 55- grain Reduced Hazard Training (RHT) bullet. BallistiClean feat ures frangible Reduced Hazard Training bullets that break -up immediately on contact with metal targets, significantly reducing ricochet and backlash danger. BallistiClean loads feature a copper -plated primer and a "NT" (non-toxic) headstamp to clearly identify BallistiClean as a training round at a glance, eliminating confusion with duty rounds. With this Federal ammunition range operators have no hazardous waste disposal problems and it meets or exceeds all OSHA and EPA standards.

9. Purpose: To be used in Department rifles to address lethal threats to the community and Department personnel with greater accuracy, enhancing community safety.

10. Authorized Use: Only members POST certified in the use of the rifle are authorized to utilize rifle ammunition.

11. Fiscal Impact: The Department spends approximately $25,000 annually for all Department firearm ammunition.

12. Lifespan: The ammunition listed above does not have an expiration date.

13. Training: Prior to using a rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass a range qualification two times a year.

14. Legal and Procedural Rules: The department will use ammunition in accordance with State and Federal law and department policy.

681
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX
A RES

OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2022-71 TO REVISE THE PAY

RANGES FOR VARI OUS CLASSIFICATIONS OF EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY THE COSTA MESA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, AND DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

WH
EREAS, on November 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolutions No. 2022-69, 202 2-70, and 2022-71 r evising the pay ranges for job classifications represented by the Costa Mesa City Employees Association; and WHEREAS, on March 21, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 2023- 15 amending Resolutions No. 2022-69, 2022-70, and 2022-71 approving updates to various classifications; and
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 2023- 27 to establish the new job classifications of Animal Services Supervisor and Cyber Security Analyst and to establish the pay ranges for the new classifications; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 2023- 37 approving updates to various classifications; and
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 2023- 45 to establish the new job classification of Code Enforcement Officer I and to establish the pay ranges for the new classification and approving updates to various classifications; and
WHEREAS, on April 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024- 13 to establish the new job classification of Animal Services Coordinator, to establish the pay ranges for the new classification and approving updates to various classifications; and WHEREAS, the City Council fu rther desires to amend Resolution 2022-71 to review the pay ranges for the classifications specified herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa as follows:

Class Class Title Salary Grade Step
Code Plan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0703 Community Services CMC 582 $5,356 $5,624 $5,905 $6,200 $6,510 $6,836 $7,178 Monthly Specialist $64,272 $67,488 $70,860 $74,400 $78,120 $82,032 $86,136 Annual $30.90 $32.45 $34.07 $35.77 $37.56 $39.44 $41.41 Hourly 0465 Crime Scene Investigator CMC 638 $6,280 $6,594 $6,924 $7,270 $7,633 $8,015 $8,416 Monthly $75,360 $79,128 $83,088 $87,240 $91,596 $96,180 $100,992 Annual $36.23 $38.04 $39.95 $41.94 $44.04 $46.24 $48.55 Hourly ATTACHMENT 14
682

0101 Engineering Technician I CMC 591 $5,438 $5,710 $5,996 $6,296 $6,611 $6,942 $7,289 Monthly $65,256 $68,520 $71,952 $75,552 $79,332 $83,304 $87,468 Annual $31.37 $32.94 $34.59 $36.32 $38.14 $40.05 $42.05 Hourly

0102 Engineering Technician II CMC 853 $6,071 $6,375 $6,694 $7,029 $7,380 $7,749 $8,136 Monthly $72,852 $76,500 $80,328 $84,348 $88,560 $92,988 $97,632 Annual $35.03 $36.78 $38.62 $40.55 $42.58 $44.71 $46.94 Hourly

0116 Engineering Technician III CMC 632 $6,673 $7,007 $7,357 $7,725 $8,111 $8,517 $8,943 Monthly $80,076 $84,084 $88,284 $92,700 $97,332 $102,204 $107,316 Annual $38.50 $40.43 $42.44 $44.57 $46.79 $49.14 $51.59 Hourly

0440 Equipment Mechanic I CMC 570 $4,863 $5,106 $5,361 $5,629 $5,910 $6,205 $6,515 Monthly $58,356 $61,272 $64,332 $67,548 $70,920 $74,460 $78,180 Annual $28.06 $29.46 $30.93 $32.48 $34.10 $35.80 $37.59 Hourly

0441 Equipment Mechanic II CMC 851 $5,818 $6,109 $6,414 $6,735 $7,072 $7,426 $7,797 Monthly $69,816 $73,308 $76,968 $80,820 $84,864 $89,112 $93,564 Annual $33.57 $35.24 $37.00 $38.86 $40.80 $42.84 $44.98 Hourly

0445 Equipment Mechanic III CMC 856 $6,270 $6,583 $6,912 $7,258 $7,621 $8,002 $8,402 Monthly $75,240 $78,996 $82,944 $87,096 $91,452 $96,024 $100,824 Annual $36.17 $37.98 $39.88 $41.87 $43.97 $46.17 $48.47 Hourly

0446 Lead Equipment Mechanic CMC 869 $7,069 $7,422 $7,793 $8,183 $8,592 $9,022 $9,473 Monthly $84,828 $89,064 $93,516 $98,196 $103,104 $108,264 $113,676 Annual $40.78 $42.82 $44.96 $47.21 $49.57 $52.05 $54.65 Hourly

0003 Office Specialist CMC 525 $3,806 $3,996 $4,196 $4,406 $4,626 $4,857 $5,100 Monthly $45,672 $47,952 $50,352 $52,872 $55,512 $58,284 $61,200 Annual $21.96 $23.05 $24.21 $25.42 $26.69 $28.02 $29.42 Hourly

0004 Office Specialist I CMC 545 $4,207 $4,417 $4,638 $4,870 $5,113 $5,369 $5,637 Monthly $50,484 $53,004 $55,656 $58,440 $61,356 $64,428 $67,644 Annual $24.27 $25.48 $26.76 $28.10 $29.50 $30.98 $32.52 Hourly

0005 Office Specialist II CMC 845 $4,533 $4,760 $4,998 $5,248 $5,510 $5,786 $6,075 Monthly $54,396 $57,120 $59,976 $62,976 $66,120 $69,432 $72,900 Annual $26.15 $27.46 $28.83 $30.28 $31.79 $33.38 $35.05 Hourly

SECTION 6. The following pay ranges and monthly rates of pay for the identified job classifications are hereby revised and placed under the Basic Salary Administration Plan effective the pay period that includes July 1, 2024 . The monthly rate of pay may also be in increments between the monthly minimum and maximum pay step.

SECTION 7. Except as modified by this Resolution, Resolutions No. 2022-69, 2022-70, 2022-71, 2023-15, 2023-27, 2023-37,2023-45 and 2024-13 shall remain in full force and effect.

683

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 2024.

______________________________
John Stephens, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________ ______________________________ Brenda Green, City Clerk Kimberly Hall Barlow, City Attorney

684

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF COSTA MESA )

I, BRENDA GREEN, City Clerk of the City of Costa Mesa, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 202 4-XX and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa at a regular meeting held on the 4
th day of June, 2024, by the following roll call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereby set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Costa Mesa this 5
th day of June, 2024.

__________________________
Brenda Green, City Clerk

(SEAL)
685
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 Future Total 1 City Hall - HVAC Retrofit Project - $ 60 0,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ -$ -$ 1,800,000 $ 2 City Hall - Solar Rooftop / Canopy Project - $ 20 0,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 3 Citywide - Costa Mesa Green Business Program - $ 50 ,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 200,000$ 400,000$ 4 Citywide - Drought Resistant Landscape and Vegetation Replacement - $ 20 0,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 600,000$ 1,400,000$ 5 Citywide - Energy Efficiency Projects - $ 10 0,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 300,000$ 700,000$ 6 Fire Stations - Electric Vehicle Solar Charging Stations - $ 15 0,000$ 235,000$ -$ -$ -$ 385,000$ 7 Various Facilities - Electric Vehicle Charging Stations - $ 15 0,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 750,000$ TOTAL ENERGY & SUSTAINABILITY -$ 1,450,000 $ 1,535,000$ 1,100,000$ 500,000$ 1,250,000$ 5,835,000$ Next Category
8 Balearic Center - ADA Upgrades (Exterior Restrooms) -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 9 Balearic Center - Fire Protection Sprinklers -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 160,000$ 160,000$ 10 Balearic Center - Install New HVAC Unit -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 350,000$ 11 Bridge Shelter - HVAC Automation -$ 165,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 165,000$ 12 Building Modification Projects 302,000$ 2 00,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,302,000$ 13 City Hall - 1st Floor Restroom and ADA Improvements -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ 750,000$ 14 City Hall - 5th Floor Air Handler Replacement 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 15 City Hall - 5th Floor Office Remodel -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 16 City Hall - All Doors Lock Replacement and Re-Key -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ 100,000$ 17 City Hall - Breezeway Roof 245,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 245,000$ 18 City Hall - Curtain and Window Improvements (1 floor per year) -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ 550,000$ 19 City Hall - Heater(s) Replacement 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 20 City Hall - Remodel Outdoor Patio Landing -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 225,000$ 225,000$ 21 City Hall - Training Room -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 22 City Hall, Communication and Senior Center Generators Replacement 2,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 23 Civic Center - Painting, Carpet Replacement & Misc. Improvements 150,000$ 1 50,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 900,000$ 24 Corp Yard - Construction of Breakroom and Additional Office Spaces -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 25 Corp Yard - Fleet Extend Bay #2 on North Side of Building for Fire Apparatus -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ 400,000 $ 450,000$ 26 Corp Yard - Fleet Shop Doors -$ -$ 300,000 $ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 27 Corp Yard - Fleet Shop Hoists -$ -$ 375,000 $ -$ -$ -$ 375,000$ 28 Corp Yard - Fleet Shop Work Station -$ -$ 40,000 $ -$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 29 Corp Yard - Old Facility Perimeter Concrete Improvements -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 30 Costa Mesa Country Club Grounds Improvements -$ 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ 31 Costa Mesa Country Club Modernization -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 32 Costa Mesa Housing James /18th Street Property Improvements 140,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 33 Downtown Aquatic Center Pool Gutter Grates -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 34 Downtown Recreation Center Lighting Upgrade -$ 180,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 180,000$ 35 Facilities Needs and Assessment Study 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 36 Fire Station 2 Reconstruction 10,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000,000$ 37 Fire Station 3 Apparatus Door Replacement -$ 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 38 Fire Station 4 Living Quarters Reconstruction 8,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,000,000$ 39 Fire Station 6 Repair Perimeter Walls -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 40 Fire Stations - Minor Projects at Various Fire Stations 150,000$ 1 00,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 550,000$

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 Through Fiscal Year 2028-2029 Category/Project Title
ENE

RGY & SUSTAINABILITY

FACILITIES
All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2024-25 is appropriated.

ATTACHMENT 15
686
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 Future Total

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 Through Fiscal Year 2028-2029 Category/Project Title
41 Mesa Verde Library - ADA Compliance Improvements - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 42 Mesa Verde Library - Roof Replacement - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 43 Norma Hertzog Community Center - AV System Repair & Upgrades 55,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 55,000 $ 44 Norma Hertzog Community Center - Roof Replacement 334,136 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 334,136 $ 45 Police Department - Emergency Communications Facility Improvements 900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ 46 Police Department - Emergency Operations Center Equipment Update - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 47 Police Department - Locker Rooms Remodel 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ 48 Police Department - Main Floor Breakroom Remodel - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 49 Police Department - Property & Evidence Warehouse Remodel - $ 150,000 $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 50 Police Department - Sewage Liner Replace. for Comm. & West. Sub Stn. 260,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 260,000 $ 51 Police Department - Weather Proofing 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ 52 Police Department - Westside Sub Station Renovation 300,000 $ 4,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,300,000 $ 53 Senior Center - Facility Improvements 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 2 50,000 $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 54 Senior Center - HVAC Replacement 725,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 725,000 $ 55 Senior Center - Roof and Roof Cap Replacement 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ 56 Various Facilities - HVAC Replacement Program - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,600,000 $ TOTAL FACILITIES 25,701,136 $ 7,670,000 $ 2,465,000 $ 900,0 00 $ 700,000 $ 4,635,000 $ 42,071,136 $ Next Category
57 Balearic Community Center - Tot Lot Playground Improvements - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 58 Balearic Community Center - Asphalt Surfacing - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 59 Bark Park Renovation - $ - $ - $ 470,000 $ - $ - $ 470,000 $ 60 Butterfly Gardens - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ 200,000 $ 61 Community Garden Development - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 750,000 $ 62 Davis School Field & Lighting - Design & Construction - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 63 Del Mesa Park - Replace Existing Playground Equipment - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 64 Del Mesa Park - Replace Walkway Lights - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 65 Fairview Park - Asphalt Trail Rehabilitation - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 66 Fairview Park - Educational Hubs and Signage - $ 88,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 88,000 $ 67 Fairview Park - Fencing, Signage, and Trail Restoration - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 375,000 $ 68 Fairview Park - Master Plan Implementation 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ 375,000 $ 69 Fairview Park - Mesa Restoration & Cultural Resource Preservation CA-ORA-58 - $ - $ 3,000,000 $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 70 Gisler Park - Light Poles Replacement - $ 95,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 95,000 $ 71 Harper Park - Playground Replacement - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 72 Heller Park - Replace Existing Restroom - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 73 Jack Hammett Sport Complex - Relevel and Restore Fields 1 and 2 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 800,000 $ 74 Kaiser Lighting and Turf - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,600,000 $ 8,600,000 $ 75 Lions Park - Open Space Improvements - $ 50,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 650,000 $ 76 Luke Davis Field Improvements 45,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 45,000 $ 77 Marina View Park - Playground Replacement - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 78 Moon Park - Replace Existing Playground Equipment (2 areas) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 79 Park Security Lighting Replacement Program - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 900,000 $ 80 Park Sidewalk / Accessibility Program 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ FACILITIES (continued)
PARKS
All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2024-25 is appropriated. 687 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 Future Total

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 Through Fiscal Year 2028-2029 Category/Project Title
81 Parsons - Lighting and Turf - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,500,000 $ 5,500,000 $ 82 Shalimar Park Improvements - $ - $ 350,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ 3,850,000 $ 83 Shiffer Park - Replace Existing Playground Equipment (2 Areas) - $ - $ 175,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 175,000 $ 84 Shiffer Park - Restroom Improvements - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 85 Smallwood Park - Improvements - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 86 TeWinkle Athletic Fields - Batting Cage Structure & Other Improvements 325,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 325,000 $ 87 TeWinkle Park - Amphitheater - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 88 TeWinkle Park - Drainage Swale - North Boundary - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 89 TeWinkle Park - Landscape Buffer North Boundary - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 90 TeWinkle Park - Landscape Median Improvements - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 91 TeWinkle Park - Security Lighting Project - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ 92 Various Parks - Parking Lot Rehabilitation - $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 450,000 $ 93 Various Parks - Playground Repairs and Replacement 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 300,000 $ 94 Various Parks - Rainbird Irrigation Controller Replacement - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 95 Victoria Corridor Park Development - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 96 Vista Park - Picnic Shelter - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 165,000 $ 165,000 $ 97 Wakeham Park - Playground and Planter Improvements - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 190,000 $ 190,000 $ 98 Westside Park Development - $ 3,000,000 $ 3,350,000 $ 2,350,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 12, 700,000 $ 99 Westside Skate Park - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ 100 Wilson Park - Replace Existing Restroom w/Pre-Fabricated - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 101 Wimbledon Park - Exercise Equipment Replacement 110,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 110,000 $ TOTAL PARKS 1,055,000 $ 5,483,000 $ 8,200,000 $ 7,72 0,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 31,150,000 $ 57,108 ,000 $ Next Category
102 Arlington Dr. at Newport Blvd. - Streetscape Improvements - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 180,000 $ 180,000 $ 103 Arlington Drive - Bark Park Parking Lot Landscape Improvements - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 104 Citywide Neighborhood Entry Improvements - $ 300,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 105 Fairview Road - Median Landscape Rehabilitation - $ 10,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 110,000 $ 106 Gisler Avenue - Bike Trail Landscape - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 165,000 $ 165,000 $ 107 Gisler Avenue - Landscape Improvements - $ - $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 $ 108 Newport Boulevard Landscape Improvements - 19th St. to Bristol St. - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 109 Newport Boulevard Landscape Improvements - S/O 17th Street - $ 25,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 275,000 $ 110 Parkway & Medians Improvement Program 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 1 75,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 1,050,000 $ 111 South Coast Drive Wall Repairs 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 112 Tree Planting and Small Tree Care Program 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 1 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 900,000 $ 113 Westside Restoration Project 290,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 2 50,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,540,000 $ TOTAL PARKWAY & MEDIANS 915,000 $ 910,000 $ 1,475,000 $ 77 5,000 $ 775,000 $ 2,370,000 $ 7 ,220,000 $ Next Category
114 Brentwood Avenue - Storm Drain System - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 793,040 $ 793,040 $ 115 Cherry Lake Storm Drain System - Phase I, II & III - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,721,600 $ 2,721,600 $ 116 Cherry Lake Storm Drain System - Phase IV & V - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,009,360 $ 2,009,360 $ PARKS (continued)

PARKWAY & MEDIANS

STREETS
All costs and projects for future FYs are estimates only and subject to change based on funding, health and safety, and community needs. Although the schedule spans five years and future, only FY 2024-25 is appropriated. 688 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 Future Total

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
From Proposed Fiscal Year 2024-25 Through Fiscal Year 2028-2029 Category/Project Title
117 Citywide Alley Improvements 700,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000 $ 118 Citywide Storm Drain Improvements - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,000,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 119 Citywide Street Improvements 4,800,000 $ 6,500,000 $ 7,000,000 $ 7,00 0,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 40,80 0,000 $ 120 Harbor Blvd., 17th St., and Gisler Ave. Rehabilitation Project (RMRA) 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,500,000 $ 121 Placentia Ave. Stormwater Quality Trash Full-Capture System 240,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 240,000 $ 122 Water Quality Improvement Project - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 $ 123 Westside Storm Drain Improvements - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,700,000 $ 1,700,000 $ 8,100,000 $ TOTAL STREETS 9,240,000 $ 8,600,000 $ 8,700,000 $ 8,70 0,000 $ 9,300,000 $ 30,324,000 $ 74,864 ,000 $ Next Category
124 Adams Avenue Active Transportation (ATP) Improvemen ts (Royal Palm to Santa Ana River - $ - $ 5,900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,900,000 $ 125 Adams Avenue Bicycle Facility Project from Fairview to Harbor 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 126 Adams Avenue Undergrounding Project 1,250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,250,000 $ 127 Airport Channel / Delhi Channel Multi-Use Trail - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,540,000 $ 2,540,000 $ 128 Baker - Coolidge Ave Traffic Signal Modifications - $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000 $ 129 Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Projects 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 2 50,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 130 Bristol St. / Baker St. - Intersection Improvement (Add EBT, WBT) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 962,500 $ 962,500 $ 131 Bristol St. / I-405 NB - Ramps (Add WBR) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 132 Bristol St. / Paularino Ave. (Add 2nd WBL) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,210 $ 300,210 $ 133 Bristol St. / Sunflower Ave. - Intersection Improvement (Add 3rd NBL) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,130,000 $ 1,130,000 $ 134 Bristol Street (Bear St. to Santa Ana Av.) - Bicycle Facility - $ - $ 75,000 $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ 525,000 $ 135 Bus Shelter Improvements - $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 136 Citywide Bicycle Rack Improvements - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 175,000 $ 137 Citywide Class II, III and IV Bicycle Projects - $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 800,000 $ 138 Citywide Neighborhood Traffic Improvements 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 1 00,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 600,000 $ 139 Citywide Traffic Signal Improvements 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 140 Clean Mobility Options Program - On-Demand Transit Services 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ -$ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 141 Costa Mesa ITS Improvements (Communications, Centra l Sys. CCTV) - $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 142 E. 17th St. / Irvine Ave. - Intersection Improvement (Add SBR, EBR) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 143 Eastside Traffic Calming (Cabrillo St., 18th St., 22nd St.) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 144 Fairview Channel Trail - Placentia Ave (n/o park) to Placentia Ave (s/o park) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,080,000 $ 1,080,000 $ 145 Fairview Road Improvement Project from Fair to Adams 300,000 $ 1,999,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,299,000 $ 146 Fairview Road Improvement Project from Fair to Newport 1,985,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,985,000 $ 147 Fairview Road. / Wilson St. - Improvements (Add EBT , WBT) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,525,000 $ 1,525,000 $ 148 Gisler Ave Class IV Cycle Tracks from Gibraltar Ave to Harbor Blvd - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 149 Gisler Ave Multi-use Trail from Gisler Ave Class II facility to Fairview Rd - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 150 Greenville-Banning Channel Phase 1 (Sunflower Ave to South Coast Drive) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 870,000 $ 870,000 $ 151 Greenville-Banning Channel Phase 2 (Santa Ana River Trail to South Coast Dr.) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,280,000 $ 3,280,000 $ 152 Harbor Blvd. / Adams Ave. - Intersection Improvemen ts (Add NBL, NBR) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 153 Harbor Blvd. / Gisler Ave. - Intersection Improveme nts (Add SBR) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,895,000 $ 4,895,000 $ STREETS (continued)